The URL can be used to link to this page

03/08/2011 - Airport Relations CommissionAGENDA EAGAN AIRPORT RELATIONS COMMISSION MEETING EAGAN COUNCIL CHAMBERS TUESDAY, MARCH 8, 2011 7:00 P.M. I. ROLL CALL AND AGENDA ADOPTION II. APPROVAL OF MINUTES III. VISITORS TO BE HEARD IV. PRESENTATIONS A. The Impact of MSP Airport on the Local Economy and Business Community V. OLD BUSINESS A. Communications Update B. MAC Monthly Reports — Eagan/Mendota Heights Corridor Analysis/Technical Advisory Report/17-35 Departure Analysis Report/Crossing in the Corridor Report VI. NEW BUSINESS A. Plans and Preparation for Showcase Eagan B. Performance Based Navigation (PBN) Procedure Design Noise Criteria VII. STAFF / COMMMISSIONER REPORT A. 2011 ARC Meeting Schedule and Invitation to Apply/Reapply for Commission Appointment B. Airport Noise Contour Analysis C. Noise Mitigation Program Update VIII. ROUNDTABLE IX. ADJOURNMENT Auxiliary aids for persons with disabilities will be provided upon advance notice of at least 96 hours. If a notice of less than 96 hours is received, the City of Eagan will attempt to provide such aid. 411 ![ City of Earn Yc�o TO: THE EAGAN AIRPORT RELATIONS COMMISSION FROM: DIANNE MILLER, ASSISTANT TO CITY ADMINISTRATOR DATE: MARCH 1, 2011 SUBJECT: AIRPORT RELATIONS COMMISSION MEETING / TUESDAY, MARCH 8, 2010 The Eagan Airport Relations Commission will meet on Tuesday, March 8, 2011 at 7:00 p.m. in the Eagan City Council Chambers. In order that there is a quorum present, please contact Mary O'Brien at 651- 675 -5005 if you are unable to attend this meeting. I. ROLL CALL AND ADOPTION OF THE AGENDA The agenda, as presented or modified, is in order for adoption by the Commission. II. APPROVAL OF MINUTES The minutes of the January 11, 2011 Airport Relations Commission meeting are enclosed on pages '/ through . These minutes are in order for adoption by the Commission. III. VISITORS TO BE HEARD The Eagan City Council and its Commissions set aside up to ten minutes at the beginning of public meetings to permit visitors to address items of interest that are not addressed on the regular agenda. Items that will take more than ten minutes or that require specific action can be scheduled for a future meeting agenda. IV. PRESENTATIONS A. The Impact of MSP Airport on the Local Economy and Business Community – Per the 2010 -2011 ARC Work Plan, a panel of experts have been invited to speak to the Commission about the economic impact that MSP International Airport has on the local business and hospitality industries. The following persons will be present at the March 8 ARC meeting to share their insight: Dennis Probst, Deputy Executive Director, Metropolitan Airports Commission — Planning and Environment Ruthe Batulis, Executive Director, Dakota County Regional Chamber of Commerce Brent Cory, Executive Director, Eagan Convention and Visitor's Bureau Mr. Probst will begin the discussion by giving a presentation on the current state of MSP Airport and anticipated trends for the future. Mr. Probst's comments about MSP will include economic indicators for the region. Ms. Batulis is prepared to speak to the relationship between the Eagan business community and MSP Airport. Likewise, Mr. Cory will speak to the impact of the airport on the Eagan restaurant and hospitality industry. The Commission is encouraged to dialogue with the panel following their presentations and comments. V. OLD BUSINESS A. Communications Update – It is the practice of the Airport Relations Commission to discuss their communication initiatives each month, which include articles in the Experience Eagan Newsletter, as well as stories aired on the City's local access cable channels. The Commission is welcome to make additional suggestions for communication initiatives regarding airport issues. B. MAC Monthly Reports – Eagan/Mendota Heights Corridor Analysis/Technical Advisory / Report/17-35 Departure Analysis Report /Crossing in the Corridor Report – Enclosed on pages ,, through 1) is the January 2011 Eagan/Mendota Heights Corridor Analysis. Enclosed on pages through ( is the January 2011 Technical Advisory Report. Enclosed on ages through 5g is the January 2011 Runway 17 Departure Analysis Report. Enclosed on pages 57 through is the Crossing in the Corridor report for the month of January 2011. The January reports were the most current reports available on the MAC website at the time of packet preparation. It is the practice of the Commission to review the reports and discuss any significant deviations that may have occurred or any other noteworthy occurrences as reported in the analyses. VI. NEW BUSINESS VII. STAFF / COMMISSIONER REPORT A. Plans and Preparations for Showcase Eagan —Per the 2010 -2011 ARC Work Plan, the Commission has expressed an interest in having a table /display at this year's Showcase Ea an, which will be aking place on Thursday, June 2 from 4:30 -7:30 p.m. at the Civic Arena. Enclosed on pages through @ is the vendor informational packet. Staff is happy to fill out the necessary registration material for the ARC's booth. The Commission is encouraged to discuss what they would like to display at their booth and any advanced preparation that may be needed. B. Performance Based Navigation (PBN) Procedure Design Noise Criteria — Enclosed on pages& 7 and 0 is a memo from Chad Leqve, MAC Manager of the Aviation Noise and Satellite Programs, to the Noise Oversight Committee (NOC) that includes proposed criteria to be considered as part of the PBN procedure development effort at MSP. The NOC will be discussing and considering the proposed criteria at the March 16 meeting and making a recommendation that the criteria be forwarded to the FAA for their consideration. The Commission is welcome to share any feedback or recommendations for additional noise criteria that could be shared at the March NOC meeting. A. 2011 ARC Meeting Schedule and Invitation to Apply/Reapply for Commission Appointments — Enclosed on page J is the 2011 ARC meeting schedule. Additionally, the terms of Commissioners Thorkildson, Aljets, Beseke, and Johnson will end in April 2011. All Commission members who are interested in seeking reappointment to the ARC, or any of the advisory commissions, must submit an application to the City of Eagan. The application (background and informed consent forms) is available on the City's website at: http: / /www.cityofeagan.com/ live /Commissions.asp ?Commission= 4648 &menu =2021. All applications must be submitted by Thursday, March 31, 2011. Applications can be sent to Mira Broyles at mbroyles @cityofeagan.com. J B. Airport Noise Contour Analysis — Enclosed on pages 7� through I � is the Comparison of the 2010 Actual Noise Contour and the 2007 Forecast Noise Contour.'The MAC is required to produce this annual report by March 1 of each year per the conditions of the consent decree (noise mitigation settlement). The report shows that the contours continue to shrink in size, particularly given the decrease in actual annual operations compared to the forecasted operations. C. Noise Mitigation Program Update — Enclosed on pages through i 441-is a memo from John Nelson, MAC Landside Project Manager, to the Finance, Development, and Environment Committee (FD &E) of the MAC summarizing the progress made to date on the noise mitigation program that resulted from the 2007 noise mitigation settlement. VIII. ROUNDTABLE Per the request of the Commission, this agenda item has been added so that Commissioners have the opportunity to ask questions or make requests for future agenda items. IX. ADJOURNMENT Per the request of the Commission, the Eagan ARC meetings will go no later than 8:30 p.m. unless agreed upon by the Commission. /s/Dianne Miller Assistant to the City Administrator 3 MINUTES OF THE EAGAN AIRPORT RELATIONS COMMISSION MEETING JANUARY 11, 2011 A regular meeting of the Eagan Airport Relations Commission was held on Tuesday, January 11, 2011 at 7:00 p.m. Those present were Curtis Aljets, Dan Johnson, Luke Olson, Chad Stambaugh, Chuck Thorkildson and Carol Whisnant. Absent was Steve Beseke. Also present was Assistant to the City Administrator Miller. AGENDA Whisnant made a motion to approve the agenda as presented. Aljets seconded the motion. All members voted in favor. APPROVAL OF MINUTES Johnson made a motion to approve the minutes of the September 14, 2010 regular meeting of the Eagan Airport Relations Commission. Stambaugh seconded the motion. All members voted in favor. VISITORS TO BE HEARD There were no visitors to be heard. COMMUNICATIONS UPDATE Miller stated it is the practice of the Airport Relations Commission to discuss their communication initiatives each month which include articles in the Experience Eagan Newsletter as well as stories aired on the City's local access cable channels. Miller stated currently the November 30, 2010 Airport Noise Town Hall meeting is being played on the local access cable TV and the recording of the meeting is also available via webstreaming on the City's website. MAC MONTHLY REPORTS — EAGAN/MENDOTA HEIGHTS CORRIDOR ANALYSIS/TECHNICAL ADVISORY REPORT /17 -35 DEPARTURE ANALYSIS REPORT /CROSSING THE CORRIDOR REPORT Miller introduced the item stating enclosed are the November 2010 Eagan /Mendota Heights Corridor Analysis Report, the November 2010 Technical Advisory Report, the November 2010 Runway 17 Departure Analysis Report and November 2010 Crossing in the Corridor Report. Miller noted the new Crossing in the Corridor Report is being included in the Commission's packet. The Commission discussed the November reports noting the top 10 loudest noise events and the number of complaints for the month. MSP 2030 LONG TERM PLAN ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT Miller introduced the item giving an overview of the Environment Assessment process underway for the 2030 Long Term Comprehensive Plan at the MSP Airport. Miller stated Phase I of the process is to expand 4 Eagan Airport Relations Commission January 11, 2011 Page 2 of 2 Terminal 2 (Humphrey) and relocate all non - Skyteam airlines to Terminal 2; and Phase II is to modernize and expand Terminal 1 (Lindberg), including a new international arrivals facility. Miller noted a letter was sent to the MAC from the City of Eagan asking the MAC, as part of the assessment process, to complete runway use assessments including a thorough review of the use of Runway 17/35 reiterating Eagan's long standing position that operations should be concentrated in the Eagan /Mendota Heights Corridor whenever possible. The Commission discussed the letter that was sent to the MAC and the environmental assessment process for the 2030 Long Term Comprehensive Plan. NOVEMBER 2010 ARC TOWN HALL MEETING Miller introduced the item noting a Town Hall meeting was held on November 30, 2010 and that approximately 45 residents attended the meeting. She further stated 41 respondents completed the survey regarding airport noise. The Commission discussed results of the airport noise survey. RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING THE 60 DNL AS THE THRESHOLD FOR PREVENTATIVE AND CORRECTIVE MEASURES AT MSP Miller gave an overview of the item and stated a resolution was passed by the City Council on November 16, 2010 that specifies that the 60 DNL is the City's airport noise threshold for preventative and corrective noise mitigation and, further, noted a one -mile buffer is the City's threshold for land use planning and development standards in the vicinity of the MSP International Airport. PLANS FOR MARCH 2011 ARC MEETING Miller introduced the item noting the last remaining item from the 2010 -2011 Work Plan to be scheduled is a discussion regarding the business /economic development impact of the MSP Airport. It was the consensus of the Commission to proceed with this final work plan item for the March 8, 2011 meeting. ROUNDTABLE The Commission discussed the Showcase Eagan event, which is scheduled to be held in June. ADJOURNMENT Upon motion by Whisnant, seconded by Aljets, the meeting adjourned at 7:35 p.m. All members voted in favor. DATE SECRETARY S 1/1/2011 — 1/31/2011 Eagan /Mendota Heights Departure Corridor Analysis Minneapolis -St. Paul International Airport This report is for inf rmational purposes only cannot be used for enforcement purposes to 2524 Carrier Jets Departed Runways 12L and 12R in January 2011 2399 (95 %) of those operations remained in the Corridor rdeappr' 2524 Total 12L & 12R Carrier Departure Operations 7 Metropolitan Airports Commission 2399 (95 %) Total 12L & 12R Carrier Departure Operations in the Corridor Minneapolis -St. Paul Penetration Gate Plot for In Corridor Gate 1/1/2011 00:00: 00 - 1/31/2011 23:59:59 2399 Tracks Crossed Gate: Left = 1271 (53 %), Right = 1128 (47 %) 3900 4900 4000 4 3300 3090 2500 2000 1900 1000 300 Xin case alert a 0 0 0 tutle ifl Ornetlon is ♦e90vailable, that. operation 11 not nepte$e tld in 4ir0Ve graph. CO 0O [Y 00fl - 1.40 - 1.20 - 1.00 - 0.00 - 0.60 - 0.40 - 0.20 0.00 0.20 .':.0.40 0.60 0.40 1.00..:;}:,x@ Deviation From Center of Grote {NHiss. Monthly Eagan /Mendota Heights Departure Corridor Analysis. Report Generated: 02/14/2011 10:06 Page 1 Metropolitan Airports Commission 40 (1.6 %) Runway 12L and 12R Carrier Jet Departure Operations were north of the 090° Corridor Boundary during January 2011. Of those, 3 ( —) returned to Corridor before reaching SE border of Ft. Snelling State Park Minneapolis -St. Paul Penetration Gate Plot for North Corridor Gate 1/1/2011 00:00: 00 - 1/31/2011 23:59:59 40 Tracks Crossed Gate. Left = 9 (22.5 %), Right = 31 (77.5 %) Page 2 Monthly Eagan /Mendota Heights Departure Corridor Analysis. Report Generated: 02/14/2011 10:06 1 Metropolitan Airports Commission 85 (3.4 %) Runway 12L and 12R Carrier Jet Departure Operations were south of the Corridor (south of 30L Localizer) during January 2011. Of those, 18 ( —) returned to Corridor before reaching SE border of Ft. Snelling State Park Minneapolis -St. Paul Penetration Gate Plot for South Corridor Gate 1/1/2011 00:00:00 - 1/31/2011 23:59:59 85 Tracks Crossed Gate: Left = 36 (42.4 %), Right = 49 (57.6 %) 5500 4500 4000 3500• 3000 2000 0 a -1.6 0 0 0 0 1,4 -1.2 -1.0 -0.8 -0.6 -0.4 -0.2 0.0 0.2 0,4 0.6 0.6 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.0 2.c (Corridor end) (RWY 1 Deviation From Center of Gate (Miles) +In 00060 were altitude information .i1 unavailable, that Operation is not rep.'eeented in 600Ve graph. Monthly Eagan /Mendota Heights Departure Corridor Analysis. Report Generated: 02/14/2011 10:06 Page 3 Metropolitan Airports Commission 4 (0.2 %) Runway 12L and 12R Carrier Jet Departure Operations were 5° south of the Corridor (5° south of 30L Localizer) during January 2011 Minneapolis -St. Paul Penetration Gate Plot for 5° South Corridor Gate 1/1/2011 00:00:00 - 1/31/2011 23:59:59 4 Tracks Crossed Gate: Left = 4 (100 %), Right = 0 (0 %) Page 4 Monthly Eagan /Mendota Heights Departure Corridor Analysis. Report Generated: 02/14/2011 10:06 /b Airport City Heading e #Ops Total Ops ORD CHICAGO (O'HARE) 124° 92 3.6% DEN DENVER 237° 69 2.7% SEA SEATTLE 278° 69 2.7% FAR FARGO 312° 66 2.6% CYYZ TORONTO 95° 64 2.5% CYWG WINNIPEG 330° 58 2.3% GFK GRAND FORKS 316° 58 2.3% BIS BISMARCK 291° 53 2.1% LAX LOS ANGELES 238° 50 2% DLH DULUTH 19° 49 1.9% ATL ATLANTA 149° 49 1.9% BOS BOSTON 97° 46 1.8% MOT MINOT 304° 46 1.8% GRB GREEN BAY 90° 46 1.8% MKE MILWAUKEE 114° 45 1.8% Top 15 Runway 12L/12R Departure Destinations for January 2011 Monthly Eagan /Mendota Heights Departure Corridor Analysis. Report Generated: 02/14/2011 10:06 Page 5 I) Metropolitan Airports Commission January 2011 Noise Oversight Committee (NOC) Technical Advisor's Report ►sn Minneapolis -St. Paul International Airport is Table of Contents for January 2011 Complaint Summary 1 Noise Complaint Map 2 FAA Available Time for Runway Usage 3 MSP All Operations Runway Usage 4 MSP Carrier Jet Operations Runway Usage 5 MSP Carrier Jet Fleet Composition 6 MSP All Operations Nighttime Runway Usage 7 MSP Carrier Jet Operations Nighttime Runway Usage 8 MSP Scheduled Nighttime Operators 9 11 MSP Top 15 Nighttime Operators by Type 12 MSP Top 15 Nighttime Operators Stage Mix 13 Airport Noise and Operations Monitoring System Flight Tracks 14 -17 MSP ANOMS Remote Monitoring Tower Site Locations Map 18 Time Above dB Threshold for Carrier Jet Arrival Related Noise Events 19 Time Above dB Threshold for Carrier Jet Departure Related Noise Events 20 Carrier Jet Arrival Related Noise Events 21 Carrier Jet Departure Related Noise Events 22 MSP Top Ten Aircraft Noise Events per RMT 23 -35 Analysis of Daily and Monthly Aircraft Noise Events DNL 36 -38 A Product of the MACeation Noise and Sattelite Program City Complaint Arrival Departure 5 Other Number of Complaints Number of Complainants % of Total Complaints EAGAN 0 1128 0 0 720 437 2 24 69 508 15 43.3% MINNEAPOLIS 0 Structural Disturbance 304 0 Other 57 6 Total 75 442 19 37.6% MENDOTA HEIGHTS 0 0 0 77 0 3 80 4 6.8% APPLE VALLEY 0 41 0 6 0 6 53 5 4.5% BLOOMINGTON 0 0 0 13 6 21 40 7 3.4% SAINT PAUL 0 0 0 14 0 1 15 4 1.3% BURNSVILLE 0 0 0 6 0 8 14 2 1.2% EDINA 0 0 0 0 0 9 9 1 0.8% CHANHASSEN 0 0 0 0 0 3 3 1 0.3% PLYMOUTH 0 0 0 0 3 0 3 1 0.3% SAINT LOUIS PARK 0 2 0 1 0 0 3 2 0.3% RICHFIELD 0 0 0 2 0 0 2 1 0.2% COTTAGE GROVE 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0.1% LAKEVILLE 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 0.1% Total 348 613 213 1174 64 Nature of MSP Complaints Complaint Total Early /Late 5 387 Engine Run -up 0 9 Excessive Noise 17 1128 Frequency 5 720 Ground Noise 0 24 Helicopter 0 2 Low Flying 8 611 Structural Disturbance 1 272 Other 0 168 Total 3357 Complaints by Airport Airport Total MSP 1174 Airlake 0 Anoka 33 Crystal 2 Flying Cloud 169 Lake Elmo 0 St. Paul 5 Misc. 0 Total 1383 Time of Day Time Total 0000 -0559 1 29 0600 -0659 2 36 0700 -1159 6 276 1200 -1559 1 181 1600 -1959 2 270 2000 -2159 2 209 2200 -2259 1 114 2300 -2359 2 42 Total 1174 MSP Complaints by City January 2011 Not Shaded Columns represent MSP complaints filed via the Internet. Sum of % Total of Complaints may not equal 100% due to rounding. "As of May 2005, the MSP Complaints by City report includes multiple complaint descriptors per individual complaint. Therefore, the number of complaint descriptors may be more than the number of reported complaints. Report Generated: 02/14/2011 16:10 - 2 - • MSP International Airport Aviation Noise Complaints for January 2011 Number of Complaints per Address • • • • • • • 1-4 5 -10 11 -18 19 -24 25-41 42 -53 54 -92 93 -214 Report Generated: 02/14/2011 16:10 Report Generated: 02/14/2011 16:10 Available Hours for Runway Use January 2011 (Source: FAA Aviation Systems Performance Metrics Data) icy RWY Arrival/ Departure Overflight Area Count Operations Percent Last Year Count Last Year Percent 04 Arr So. Richfield /Bloomington 0 0% 1 0% 12L Arr So. Minneapolis /No. Richfield 2798 16% 3088 18.4% 12R Arr So. Minneapolis /No. Richfield 2674 15.3% 3074 18.3% 17 Arr So. Minneapolis 0 0% 0 0% 22 Arr St. Paul /Highland Park 0 0% 0 0% 30L Arr Eagan /Mendota Heights 4181 23.9% 3463 20.6% 30R Arr Eagan /Mendota Heights 5054 28.9% 4102 24.4% 35 Arr Bloomington /Eagan 2784 15.9% 3092 18.4% Total Arrivals 17491 16820 RWY Arrival/ Departure Overflight Area Count Operations Percent Last Year Count Last Year Percent 04 Dep St. Paul /Highland Park 1 0% 2 0% 12L Dep Eagan /Mendota Heights 1783 10.2% 1945 11.6% 12R Dep Eagan /Mendota Heights 1115 6.4% 926 5.5% 17 Dep Bloomington /Eagan 3533 20.2% 3767 22.5% 22 Dep So. Richfield /Bloomington 6 0% 9 0.1% 30L Dep So. Minneapolis /No. Richfield 5479 31.3% 4716 28.1% 30R Dep So. Minneapolis /No. Richfield 5572 31.9% 5399 32.2% 35 Dep So. Minneapolis 0 0% 2 0% Total Departures 17489 16766 Total Operations 34980 33586 All Operations Runway Use Report January 2011 - 4 - 17 Sum of RUS % may not equal 100% due to rounding. Report Generated: 02/14/2011 16:10 RWY Arrival/ Departure Overflight Area Count Operations Percent Last Year* Count Last Year Percent 04 Arr So. Richfield /Bloomington 0 0% 0 0% 12L Arr So. Minneapolis /No. Richfield 2540 16.3% 2654 18.3% 12R Arr So. Minneapolis /No. Richfield 2385 15.3% 2715 18.7% 17 Arr So. Minneapolis 0 0% 0 0% 22 Arr St. Paul /Highland Park 0 0% 0 0% 30L Arr Eagan /Mendota Heights 3662 23.5% 3018 20.8% 30R Arr Eagan /Mendota Heights 4599 29.5% 3573 24.6% 35 Arr Bloomington /Eagan 2427 15.5% 2576 17.7% Total Arrivals 15613 14536 RWY Arrival/ Departure Overflight Area Count Operations Percent Last Year* Count Last Year Percent 04 Dep St. Paul /Highland Park 0 0% 2 0% 12L Dep Eagan /Mendota Heights 1494 9.6% 1515 10.4% 12R Dep Eagan /Mendota Heights 1030 6.6% 762 5.3% 17 Dep Bloomington /Eagan 3274 21% 3468 23.9% 22 Dep So. Richfield /Bloomington 6 0% 8 0.1% 30L Dep So. Minneapolis /No. Richfield 5024 32.2% 4147 28.6% 30R Dep So. Minneapolis /No. Richfield 4796 30.7% 4596 31.7% 35 Dep So. Minneapolis 0 0% 0 0% Total Departures 15624 14498 Total Operations 31237 29034 Carrier Jet Operations Runway Use Report January 2011 *NOTE: Due to flight tracking data enhancements, the air carrier operations counts for Last Year included in this report have been updated to reflect revised aircraft type counts. Please refer to the interactive reports at www.macnoise.com for detailed information regarding aircraft types. Sum of RUS % may not equal 100% due to rounding. Report Generated: 02/14/2011 16:10 -5- Type FAR Part 36 Take - Off Noise Level' Aircraft Description Stage Count Percent DC10 101.8 McDonnell Douglas DC10 3 160 0.5% B744 101.6 Boeing 747 -400 3 63 0.2% DC9Q 98.1 McDonnell Douglas DC9 Modified Stage 3 3 690 2.2% B72Q 97.6 Boeing 727 Modified Stage 3 3 61 0.2% DC8Q 95.7 McDonnell Douglas DC8 Re- manufactured 3 61 0.2% A330 95.6 Airbus Industries A330 3 183 0.6% MD11 92.8 McDonnell Douglas MD11 3 69 0.2% B767 92.1 Boeing 767 -200 3 247 0.8% A300 91.5 Airbus Industries A300 3 2 0% MD80 91.5 McDonnell Douglas MD80 3 907 2.9% B73Q 91.4 Boeing 737 Modified Stage 3 3 9 0% B757 91.4 Boeing 757 -200 3 1926 6.2% A321 89.8 Airbus Industries A321 3 121 0.4% B734 88.9 Boeing 737 -400 3 14 0% B738 88.6 Boeing 737 -800 3 1654 5.3% B739 88.4 Boeing 737 -900 3 60 0.2% A320 87.8 Airbus Industries A320 3 2564 8.2% B735 87.7 Boeing 737 -500 3 100 0.3% 8733 87.5 Boeing 737 -300 3 393 1.3% A319 87.4 Airbus Industries A319 3 2440 7.8% E190 86.9 Embraer 190 3 36 0.1% B7377 85.9 Boeing 737 -700 3 909 2.9% CRJ 84.6 Canadair Regional Jet -CRJ 3 11617 37.2% MD90 84.2 McDonnell Douglas MD90 3 1330 4.3% B717 84.1 Boeing 717 3 317 1% A318 84.1 Airbus Industries A318 3 37 0.1% E170 83.7 Embraer 170 3 4437 14.2% E145 83.7 Embraer 145 3 812 2.6% E135 77.9 Embraer 135 3 16 0.1% J328 76.5 Fairchild Dornier 328 3 2 0% Totals 31237 January 2011 MSP Carrier Jet Fleet Composition Sum of fleet mix % may not equal 100% due to rounding. NOTE 1: Stage 3 represent aircraft modified to meet all Stage 3 criteria as outlined in Federal Aviation Regulation (FAR) Part 36. This includes hushkit engines, engine retrofits or aircraft operational flight configurations. UPS DC8Q are re- engined with manufactured Stage 3 engines and are classified as Stage 3 Manufactured as of January 1, 2008. -The Provided Noise levels from FAR Part 36 are the loudest levels documented for the representative aircraft type during take -off measured in EPNL dBA (Effective Perceived Noise Level). -EPNL is the level of the time integral of the antilogarithm of one -tenth of tone - corrected perceived noise level of an aircraft flyover measured in A- weighted decibels. NOTE 2: Due to flight tracking data enhancements, the air carrier operations counts for Last Year included in this report have been updated to reflect revised aircraft type counts. Please refer to the interactive reports at www.macnoise.com for detailed information regarding aircraft types. Report Generated: 02/14/2011 16:10 Count Current Percent Last Year Percent Stage 2 0 0% 0% Stage 3 760 2.4% 9.8% Stage 3 Manufactured 30477 97.6% 90.2% Total Stage 3 31237 January 2011 MSP Carrier Jet Fleet Composition Sum of fleet mix % may not equal 100% due to rounding. NOTE 1: Stage 3 represent aircraft modified to meet all Stage 3 criteria as outlined in Federal Aviation Regulation (FAR) Part 36. This includes hushkit engines, engine retrofits or aircraft operational flight configurations. UPS DC8Q are re- engined with manufactured Stage 3 engines and are classified as Stage 3 Manufactured as of January 1, 2008. -The Provided Noise levels from FAR Part 36 are the loudest levels documented for the representative aircraft type during take -off measured in EPNL dBA (Effective Perceived Noise Level). -EPNL is the level of the time integral of the antilogarithm of one -tenth of tone - corrected perceived noise level of an aircraft flyover measured in A- weighted decibels. NOTE 2: Due to flight tracking data enhancements, the air carrier operations counts for Last Year included in this report have been updated to reflect revised aircraft type counts. Please refer to the interactive reports at www.macnoise.com for detailed information regarding aircraft types. Report Generated: 02/14/2011 16:10 RWY Arrival/ Departure Overflight Area Count Operations Percent Last Year Count Last Year Percent 04 Arr So. Richfield /Bloomington 0 0% 0 0% 12L Arr So. Minneapolis /No. Richfield 139 14.2% 92 10.2% 12R Arr So. Minneapolis /No. Richfield 217 22.1% 154 17.1% 17 Arr So. Minneapolis 0 0% 0 0% 22 Arr St. Paul /Highland Park 0 0% 0 0% 30L Arr Eagan /Mendota Heights 323 32.9% 401 44.5% 30R Arr Eagan /Mendota Heights 296 30.1% 249 27.6% 35 Arr Bloomington /Eagan 7 0.7% 6 0.7% Total Arrivals 982 902 RWY Arrival/ Departure Overflight Area Count Operations Percent Last Year Count Last Year Percent 04 Dep St. Paul /Highland Park 1 0.2% 0 0% 12L Dep Eagan /Mendota Heights 149 27.1% 41 16% 12R Dep Eagan /Mendota Heights 123 22.4% 65 25.4% 17 Dep Bloomington /Eagan 14 2.5% 18 7% 22 Dep So. Richfield /Bloomington 0 0% 3 1.2% 30L Dep So. Minneapolis /No. Richfield 145 26.4% 63 24.6% 30R Dep So. Minneapolis /No. Richfield 118 21.5% 64 25% 35 Dep So. Minneapolis 0 0% 2 0.8% Total Departures 550 256 Total Operations 1532 1158 Nighttime All Operations 10:30 p.m. to 6:00 a.m. Runway Use Report January 2011 Report Generated: 02/14/2011 16:10 cD O Sum of RUS % may not equal 100% due to rounding. -7- RWY Arrival/ Departure Overflight Area Count Operations Percent Last Year* Count Last Year Percent 04 Arr So. Richfield /Bloomington 0 0% 0 0% 12L Arr So. Minneapolis /No. Richfield 133 14.5% 84 10.1% 12R Arr So. Minneapolis /No. Richfield 202 22% 149 18% 17 Arr So. Minneapolis 0 0% 0 0% 22 Arr St. Paul /Highland Park 0 0% 0 0% 30L Arr Eagan /Mendota Heights 304 33.1% 369 44.5% 30R Arr Eagan /Mendota Heights 273 29.7% 227 27.3% 35 Arr Bloomington /Eagan 7 0.8% 1 0.1% Total Arrivals 919 830 RWY Arrival/ Departure Overflight Area Count Operations Percent Last Year* Count Last Year Percent 04 Dep St. Paul /Highland Park 0 0% 0 0% 12L Dep Eagan /Mendota Heights 136 27% 33 16.8% 12R Dep Eagan /Mendota Heights 113 22.4% 49 24.9% 17 Dep Bloomington /Eagan 12 2.4% 14 7.1% 22 Dep So. Richfield /Bloomington 0 0% 2 1% 30L Dep So. Minneapolis /No. Richfield 132 26.2% 51 25.9% 30R Dep So. Minneapolis /No. Richfield 111 22% 48 24.4% 35 Dep So. Minneapolis 0 0% 0 0% Total Departures 504 197 Total Operations 1423 1027 Nighttime Carrier Jet Operations 10:30 p.m. to 6:00 a.m. Runway Use Report January 2011 NOTE: Due to flight tracking data enhancements, the air carrier operations counts for Last Year included in this report have been updated to reflect revised aircraft type counts. Please refer to the interactive reports at www.macnoise.com for detailed information regarding aircraft types. Sum of RUS % may not equal 100% due to rounding. - 8 - "I Report Generated: 02/14/2011 16:10 Airline Stage 2 Stage 3 Manufactured Stage 3 Total Delta (DAL) 0 0 178 178 Sun Country (SCX) 0 0 119 119 UPS (UPS) 0 0 55 55 FedEx (FDX) 0 16 36 52 US Airways (USA) 0 0 50 50 American (AAL) 0 0 42 42 Continental (COA) 0 0 29 29 Airtran (TRS) 0 0 28 28 Frontier Airlines (FFT) 0 0 26 26 United (UAL) 0 0 22 22 Southwest (SWA) 0 0 15 15 Total 0 16 600 616 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 February 2011 Nighttime Scheduled Carrier Jet Operations 10:30 p.m. to 6:00 a.m. CO O , 1 co V O IL M 1 C` V O ��-1 C) _ ..t-1 [" V O a [ O � M .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. N N CO CO CO CO O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O Report Generated: 02/14/2011 16:10 Time February 2011 Nighttime Scheduled Carrier Jet Operations 10:30 p. m. to 6:00 a.m. Qa- 0 DAL SCX 1. UPS • FOX 0 USA 0 AAL COA TRS 0 FFT 0 UAL 0 SWA -9- Time A/D Carrier Flight Number Equipment Stage 3 Days of Operation Routing 22:35 A Sun Country 384 B738 M MF RSW MSP 22:40 A Southwest 220 B737 M Su LAX PHX MSP 22:43 A Delta 2692 B757 M MTWThFSu PHX MSP 22:43 A Frontier Airlines 1777 E170 M MTWThFSu MKE MSP 22:45 A American 1150 MD80 M ThFSSu DFW MSP 22:47 A Frontier Airlines 108 A319 M Su DEN MSP 22:47 A Frontier Airlines 108 A320 M S DEN MSP 22:49 A Delta 2197 A320 M MTThFSu DTW MSP 22:49 A Delta 2197 738 M W DTW MSP 22:50 A American 1598 MD80 M MTW SEA DFW MSP 22:52 A Airtran 869 B737 M MTWThFSSu ATL MSP 23:03 A United 726 A319 M T DEN MSP 23:03 A United 726 A319 M MWThF OAK DEN MSP 23:05 A Sun Country 346 B737 M SSu MCO MSP 23:05 A Southwest 2823 B737 M MTWThF SFO PHX MSP 23:05 A Sun Country 346 B738 M F MCO MSP 23:05 A Southwest 2563 B733 M Su SLC DEN MSP 23:15 A Sun Country 384 B737 M S RSW MSP 23:24 A United 726 A320 M Su OAK DEN MSP 23:25 A Sun Country 704 B738 M MWThFSu PHX MSP 23:25 A Sun Country 704 B737 M T PHX MSP 23:25 A Sun Country 384 B738 M ThSu RSW MSP 23:27 A Delta 4696 CRJ M MTWThFSSu SLC MSP 23:30 A Sun Country 404 B737 M MThFSu SAN MSP 23:30 A Sun Country 416 B737 M MThFSu PSP MSP 23:50 A American 3731 CRJ M ThFSu ORD MSP 23:50 A Sun Country 704 B738 M S PHX MSP 23:53 A US Airways 58 A320 M MTWThFSSu CLT MSP 23:55 A American 3731 CRJ M MTW ORD MSP 23:56 A US Airways 55 A321 M MTWThFSSu SAN PHX MSP 23:56 A Delta 300 B757 M MTWThFSSu ATL MSP 00:05 A Sun Country 106 B738 M MTThFS LAS MSP 00:05 A Sun Country 106 B737 M W LAS MSP 00:11 A Delta 1650 A320 M MTWThFS LAS MSP 00:12 A Delta 1568 A320 M MTWThFSSu LAX MSP 00:15 A Sun Country 548 B738 M Su SJD MSP 00:20 A Sun Country 594 B738 M M MZT MSP 00:22 A Delta 1650 MD90 M Su LAS MSP 00:25 A Sun Country 544 B738 M Su CUN MSP 00:35 A Sun Country 422 B737 M TFS LAX MSP 00:40 A Sun Country 594 B738 M Su MZT MSP 03:18 A UPS 994 B757 M F 04:03 D UPS 994 B757 M F 04:19 A UPS 556 B757 M TWThF 04:28 A UPS 558 B757 M TWThF 05:02 A UPS 548 B757 M S 05:10 A FedEx 1718 MD11 M WThFS 05:15 A UPS 560 MD11 M TWThF 05:20 A FedEx 1156 B72Q H WThFS 05:20 A Sun Country 410 8738 M MTh LAX MSP February 2011 Nighttime Scheduled Carrier Jet Operations - 10 - Report Generated: 02/14/2011 16:10 Time A/D Carrier Flight Number Equipment Stage 3 Days of Operation Routing 05:20 D Delta 1665 A320 M MTWThFSSu MSP ATL 05:25 D Continental 2729 E145 M MTWThF MSP IAH 05:35 D Continental 2997 E145 M MTWThF MSP EWR 05:41 A FedEx 1407 MD11 M WThFSSu 05:50 D American 3842 CRJ M MTWThFSSu MSP ORD 05:54 A UPS 496 B757 M S 05:59 A Delta 2814 MD90 M MTWThFSSu SEA MSP LGA February 2011 Nighttime Scheduled Carrier Jet Operations Report Generated: 02/14/2011 16:10 ' Airline ID Stage Type Count Air Transport Intl ATN 3 DC8Q 31 Airtran TRS 3 B717 10 Airtran TRS 3 B7377 28 America West AWE 3 A320 29 America West AWE 3 A321 33 American AAL 3 B738 11 American AAL 3 MD80 30 Compass CPZ 3 E170 43 Continental Exp. BTA 3 E145 33 Delta DAL 3 E170 1 Delta DAL 3 DC9Q 3 Delta DAL 3 CRJ 5 Delta DAL 3 A330 8 Delta DAL 3 B767 12 Delta DAL 3 MD80 22 Delta DAL 3 B738 33 Delta DAL 3 A319 47 Delta DAL 3 MD90 55 Delta DAL 3 B757 76 Delta DAL 3 A320 122 FedEx FDX 3 MD11 1 FedEx FDX 3 A300 1 FedEx FDX 3 B72Q 20 FedEx FDX 3 DC10 36 Mesaba MES 3 CRJ 95 Pinnacle FLG 3 CRJ 95 Skywest Airlines SKW 3 CRJ 107 Southwest SWA 3 B733 15 Southwest SWA 3 B7377 32 Sun Country SCX 3 B7377 63 Sun Country SCX 3 B738 128 UPS UPS 3 MD11 20 UPS UPS 3 B757 38 United UAL 3 B757 1 United UAL 3 A320 15 United UAL 3 A319 16 TOTAL 1315 Hour Count 2230 438 2300 478 2400 176 100 37 200 14 300 15 400 39 500 227 TOTAL 1423 - 12 - January 2011 Top 15 Actual Nighttime Jet Operators by Type 10:30 p.m. to 6:00 a.m. Total Nighttime Jet Operations by Hour Note: The top 15 nighttime operators represent 92.4% of the total nighttime carrier jet operations. R Report Generated: 02/14/2011 16:10 Airline Stage 2 Stage 3 Manufactured Stage 3 Total Delta (DAL) 0 3 381 384 Sun Country (SCX) 0 0 191 191 Skywest Airlines (SKW) 0 0 107 107 Mesaba (MES) 0 0 95 95 Pinnacle (FLG) 0 0 95 95 America West (AWE) 0 0 62 62 UPS (UPS) 0 0 58 58 FedEx (FDX) 0 20 38 58 Southwest (SWA) 0 0 47 47 Compass (CPZ) 0 0 43 43 American (AAL) 0 0 41 41 Airtran (TRS) 0 0 38 38 Continental Exp. (BTA) 0 0 33 33 United (UAL) 0 0 32 32 Air Transport Intl (ATN) 0 0 31 31 Other 0 3 105 109 Total 0 26 1397 1423 260 240 220 200 180 160 140 120 100 January 2011 Nighttime Carrier Jet Operations Mix for Top 15 Airlines 10:30 p.m. to 6:00 a.m. 80 60 40 20 0 I 0 C7 V O £ - M O IC) - M V O . � - 1 (` � O £C) - M LC) O LC - M O IC - CO . . .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. . . .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. . . .. .. .. .. .. .. N N M CO CO C7 O O O O rl 0 0 = O - N N N N P7 C7 CO CO `S Cr Cr 0 0 0 WI 0 = N N N N N N O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O Report Generated: 02/14/2011 16:10 Time January 2011 Nighttime Carrier Jet Fleet Stage Mix for Top 15 Airlines 10:30 p.m. to 6:00 a.m. (gLp ❑ DAL SCX ❑ SKW MES E. FLG AWE UPS FDX SWA CPZ 0 AAL TRS BTA 0 UAL ATN ❑ * - 13 - r- iitt7l1 Jan 1 thru 8, 2011 - 235 Nighttime Carrier Jet Arrivals - 14 - Airport Noise and Operations Monitoring System Flight Tracks Carrier Jet Operations - January 2011 Jan 1 thru 8, 2011 - 4087 Carrier Jet Arrivals Jan 1 thru 8, 2011 - 4105 Carrier Jet Departures Jan 1 thru 8, 2011 - 143 Nighttime Carrier Jet Departures Report Generated: 02/14/2011 16:10 Airport Noise and Operations Monitoring System Flight Tracks Carrier Jet Operations - January 2011 Jan 9 thru 16, 2011 - 3970 Carrier Jet Arrivals Jan 9 thru 16, 2011 - 245 Nighttime Carrier Jet Arrivals Jan 9 thru 16, 2011 - 168 Nighttime Carrier Jet Departures Report Generated: 02/14/2011 16:10 ag Jan 9 thru 16, 2011 - 3968 Carrier Jet Departures - 15 - I . , W:AMa17%r L Jan 17 thru 24, 2011 - 228 Nighttime Carrier Jet Arrivals - 16 - Airport Noise and Operations Monitoring System Flight Tracks Carrier Jet Operations - January 2011 Jan 17 thru 24, 2011 - 4007 Carrier Jet Arrivals Jan 17 thru 24, 2011 - 4022 Carrier Jet Departures Jan 17 thru 24, 2011 - 94 Nighttime Carrier Jet Departures Report Generated: 02/14/2011 16:10 Airport Noise and Operations Monitoring System Flight Tracks Carrier Jet Operations - January 2011 Jan 25 thru 31, 2011 - 3549 Carrier Jet Arrivals 101 11 i t 1 ,v0.� ' :rr� a .a:..• � � ; �� " mf • ::r �r \ �r =BM Vi ■ Jan 25 thru 31, 2011 - 211 Nighttime Carrier Jet Arrivals Jan 25 thru 31, 2011 - 99 Nighttime Carrier Jet Departures Report Generated: 02/14/2011 16:10 Jan 25 thru 31, 2011 - 3529 Carrier Jet Departures - 17 - MSP International Airport Remote Monitoring Tower (RMT) Site Locations Apple Valley - 18 - Remote Monitoring Tower 31 Report Generated: 02/14/2011 16:10 RMT ID City Address Time >= 65dB Time >= 80dB Time >= 90dB Time >= 100dB 1 Minneapolis Xerxes Ave. & 41st St. 04:13:30 00:00:00 00:00:00 00:00:00 2 Minneapolis Fremont Ave. & 43rd St. 08:53:44 00:01:08 00:00:00 00:00:00 3 Minneapolis West Elmwood St. & Belmont Ave. 12:04:25 00:08:51 00:00:00 00:00:00 4 Minneapolis Park Ave. & 48th St. 09:31:38 00:01:53 00:00:00 00:00:00 5 Minneapolis 12th Ave. & 58th St. 11:30:38 01:10:46 00:00:00 00:00:00 6 Minneapolis 25th Ave. & 57th St. 12:04:23 01:03:14 00:00:18 00:00:00 7 Richfield Wentworth Ave. & 64th St. 00:12:40 00:00:00 00:00:00 00:00:00 8 Minneapolis Longfellow Ave. & 43rd St. 00:12:08 00:00:00 00:00:00 00:00:00 9 St. Paul Saratoga St. & Hartford Ave. 00:00:28 00:00:00 00:00:00 00:00:00 10 St. Paul Itasca Ave. & Bowdoin St. 00:00:38 00:00:00 00:00:00 00:00:00 11 St. Paul Finn St. & Scheffer Ave. 00:00:39 00:00:00 00:00:00 00:00:00 12 St. Paul Alton St. & Rockwood Ave. 00:00:23 00:00:00 00:00:00 00:00:00 13 Mendota Heights Southeast end of Mohican Court 00:04:31 00:00:00 00:00:00 00:00:00 14 Eagan 1st St. & McKee St. 10:49:40 00:00:06 00:00:00 00:00:00 15 Mendota Heights Cullon St. & Lexington Ave. 00:13:18 00:00:00 00:00:00 00:00:00 16 Eagan Avalon Ave. & Vilas Ln. 16:49:45 00:15:47 00:00:00 00:00:00 17 Bloomington 84th St. & 4th Ave. 00:00:16 00:00:00 00:00:00 00:00:00 18 Richfield 75th St. & 17th Ave. 00:10:34 00:00:00 00:00:00 00:00:00 19 Bloomington 16th Ave. & 84th St. 00:05:39 00:00:00 00:00:00 00:00:00 20 Richfield 75th St. & 3rd Ave. 00:00:00 00:00:00 00:00:00 00:00:00 21 Inver Grove Heights Barbara Ave. & 67th St. 00:02:11 00:00:00 00:00:00 00:00:00 22 Inver Grove Heights Anne Marie Trail 03:54:53 00:00:01 00:00:00 00:00:00 23 Mendota Heights End of Kenndon Ave. 01:11:44 00:00:18 00:00:00 00:00:00 24 Eagan Chapel Ln. & Wren Ln. 09:48:21 00:00:11 00:00:00 00:00:00 25 Eagan Moonshine Park 1321 Jurdy Rd. 00:14:43 00:00:00 00:00:00 00:00:00 26 Inver Grove Heights 6796 Arkansas Ave. W. 00:22:51 00:00:00 00:00:00 00:00:00 27 Minneapolis Anthony School 5757 Irving Ave. S. 00:05:55 00:00:00 00:00:00 00:00:00 28 Richfield 6645 16th Ave. S. 00:52:43 00:00:03 00:00:00 00:00:00 29 Minneapolis Ericsson Elem. School 4315 31st Ave. S. 00:00:14 00:00:00 00:00:00 00 :00:00 30 Bloomington 8715 River Ridge Rd. 01:43:10 00:00:00 00:00:00 00:00:00 31 Bloomington 9501 12th Ave. S. 00:00:33 00:00:00 00:00:00 00:00:00 32 Bloomington 10325 Pleasant Ave. S. 00:00:00 00:00:00 00:00:00 00:00:00 33 Burnsville North River Hills Park 00:00:16 00:00:00 00:00:00 00:00:00 34 Burnsville Red Oak Park 00:02:55 00:00:00 00:00:00 00:00:00 35 Eagan 2100 Garnet Ln. 01:44:15 00:00:00 00:00:00 00:00:00 36 Apple Valley Briar Oaks & Scout Pond 05:10:27 00:00:01 00:00:00 00:00:00 37 Eagan 4399 Woodgate Ln. N. 00:00:29 00:00:00 00:00:00 00:00:00 38 Eagan 3957 Turquoise Cir. 00:00:09 00:00:00 00:00:00 00:00:00 39 Eagan 3477 St. Charles Pl. 00:00:00 00:00:00 00:00:00 00:00:00 Total Time for Arrival Noise Events 112:14:46 02:42:19 00:00:18 00:00:00 Time Above dB Threshold for Arrival Related Noise Events January 2011 Report Generated: 02/14/2011 16:10 - 19 - RMT ID City Address Time >= 65dB Time >= 80dB Time >= 90dB Time >_ 100dB 1 Minneapolis Xerxes Ave. & 41st St. 02:10:51 00:00:51 00:00:00 00:00:00 2 Minneapolis Fremont Ave. & 43rd St. 03:08:19 00:00:37 00:00:00 00:00:00 3 Minneapolis West Elmwood St. & Belmont Ave. 06:27:04 00:04:57 00:00:29 00:00:00 4 Minneapolis Park Ave. & 48th St. 08:02:13 00:04:40 00:00:00 00:00:00 5 Minneapolis 12th Ave. & 58th St. 27:06:44 01:00:13 00:02:52 00:00:00 6 Minneapolis 25th Ave. & 57th St. 40:09:56 02:55:10 00:16:51 00:00:05 7 Richfield Wentworth Ave. & 64th St. 17:44:55 00:16:43 00:00:00 00:00:00 8 Minneapolis Longfellow Ave. & 43rd St. 10:06:38 00:11:42 00:00:02 00:00:00 9 St. Paul Saratoga St. & Hartford Ave. 00:00:50 00:00:00 00:00:00 00:00:00 10 St. Paul Itasca Ave. & Bowdoin St. 00:00:52 00:00:00 00:00:00 00:00:00 11 St. Paul Finn St. & Scheffer Ave. 00:01:54 00:00:00 00:00:00 00:00:00 12 St. Paul Alton St. & Rockwood Ave. 00:00:45 00:00:00 00:00:00 00:00:00 13 Mendota Heights Southeast end of Mohican Court 03:04:31 00:00:19 00:00:00 00:00:00 14 Eagan 1st St. & McKee St. 04:38:29 00:05:42 00:00:06 00:00:00 15 Mendota Heights Cullon St. & Lexington Ave. 04:24:05 00:00:49 00:00:00 00:00:00 16 Eagan Avalon Ave. & Vilas Ln. 05:00:28 00:11:22 00:00:23 00:00:00 17 Bloomington 84th St. & 4th Ave. 00:12:26 00:00:54 00:00:16 00:00:00 18 Richfield 75th St. & 17th Ave. 06:36:37 00:05:21 00:00:32 00:00:00 19 Bloomington 16th Ave. & 84th St. 02:48:30 00:00:34 00:00:00 00:00:00 20 Richfield 75th St. & 3rd Ave. 00:17:48 00:00:39 00:00:00 00:00:00 21 Inver Grove Heights Barbara Ave. & 67th St. 00:36:31 00:00:18 00:00:00 00:00:00 22 Inver Grove Heights Anne Marie Trail 00:35:48 00:00:09 00:00:00 00:00:00 23 Mendota Heights End of Kenndon Ave. 08:42:23 00:09:46 00:00:29 00:00:00 24 Eagan Chapel Ln. & Wren Ln. 02:44:09 00:00:40 00:00:00 00:00:00 25 Eagan Moonshine Park 1321 Jurdy Rd. 02:55:58 00:00:06 00:00:00 00:00:00 26 Inver Grove Heights 6796 Arkansas Ave. W. 01:22:35 00:01:23 00:00:00 00:00:00 27 Minneapolis Anthony School 5757 Irving Ave. S. 07:32:54 00:03:21 00:00:00 00:00:00 28 Richfield 6645 16th Ave. S. 12:31:47 00:04:25 00:00:00 00:00:00 29 Minneapolis Ericsson Elem. School 4315 31st Ave. S. 04:30:58 00:00:36 00:00:00 00 :00:00 30 Bloomington 8715 River Ridge Rd. 12:05:29 00:19:11 00:00:06 00:00:00 31 Bloomington 9501 12th Ave. S. 00:57:53 00:00:01 00:00:00 00:00:00 32 Bloomington 10325 Pleasant Ave. S. 00:17:11 00:00:00 00:00:00 00:00:00 33 Burnsville North River Hills Park 01:09:43 00:00:10 00:00:00 00:00:00 34 Burnsville Red Oak Park 00:27:08 00:00:05 00:00:00 00:00:00 35 Eagan 2100 Garnet Ln. 01:38:13 00:00:33 00:00:00 00:00:00 36 Apple Valley Briar Oaks & Scout Pond 00:35:14 00:00:19 00:00:00 00:00:00 37 Eagan 4399 Woodgate Ln. N. 00:46:20 00:00:01 00:00:00 00:00:00 38 Eagan 3957 Turquoise Cir. 01:29:56 00:00:17 00:00:00 00:00:00 39 Eagan 3477 St. Charles PI. 02:19:04 00:01:01 00:00:00 00:00:00 Total Time for Departure Noise Events 205:23:09 05:42:55 00:22:06 00:00:05 Time Above Threshold dB for Departure Related Noise Events January 2011 - 20 - Report Generated: 02/14/2011 16:10 RMT ID City Address Arrival Events >= 65dB Arrival Events >= 80dB Arrival Events >= 90dB Arrival Events >= 100dB 1 Minneapolis Xerxes Ave. & 41st St. 1315 0 0 0 2 Minneapolis Fremont Ave. & 43rd St. 2525 20 0 0 3 Minneapolis West Elmwood St. & Belmont Ave. 2687 145 0 0 4 Minneapolis Park Ave. & 48th St. 2740 41 0 0 5 Minneapolis 12th Ave. & 58th St. 2740 1241 0 0 6 Minneapolis 25th Ave. & 57th St. 2877 1277 14 0 7 Richfield Wentworth Ave. & 64th St. 38 0 0 0 8 Minneapolis Longfellow Ave. & 43rd St. 40 0 0 0 9 St. Paul Saratoga St. & Hartford Ave. 2 0 0 0 10 St. Paul Itasca Ave. & Bowdoin St. 2 0 0 0 11 St. Paul Finn St. & Scheffer Ave. 2 0 0 0 12 St. Paul Alton St. & Rockwood Ave. 1 0 0 0 13 Mendota Heights Southeast end of Mohican Court 24 0 0 0 14 Eagan 1st St. & McKee St. 3039 2 0 0 15 Mendota Heights Cullon St. & Lexington Ave. 56 0 0 0 16 Eagan Avalon Ave. & Vilas Ln. 4125 274 0 0 17 Bloomington 84th St. & 4th Ave. 1 0 0 0 18 Richfield 75th St. & 17th Ave. 50 0 0 0 19 Bloomington 16th Ave. & 84th St. 26 0 0 0 20 Richfield 75th St. & 3rd Ave. 0 0 0 0 21 Inver Grove Heights Barbara Ave. & 67th St. 12 0 0 0 22 Inver Grove Heights Anne Marie Trail 1281 1 0 0 23 Mendota Heights End of Kenndon Ave. 275 7 0 0 24 Eagan Chapel Ln. & Wren Ln. 2930 2 0 0 25 Eagan Moonshine Park 1321 Jurdy Rd. 71 0 0 0 26 Inver Grove Heights 6796 Arkansas Ave. W. 117 0 0 0 27 Minneapolis Anthony School 5757 Irving Ave. S. 30 0 0 0 28 Richfield 6645 16th Ave. S. 208 2 0 0 29 Minneapolis Ericsson Elem. School 4315 31st Ave. S. 1 0 0 0 30 Bloomington 8715 River Ridge Rd. 546 0 0 0 31 Bloomington 9501 12th Ave. S. 2 0 0 0 32 Bloomington 10325 Pleasant Ave. S. 0 0 0 0 33 Burnsville North River Hills Park 2 0 0 0 34 Burnsville Red Oak Park 18 0 0 0 35 Eagan 2100 Garnet Ln. 554 0 0 0 36 Apple Valley Briar Oaks & Scout Pond 1481 1 0 0 37 Eagan 4399 Woodgate Ln. N. 2 0 0 0 38 Eagan 3957 Turquoise Cir. 1 0 0 0 39 Eagan 3477 St. Charles PI. 0 0 0 0 Total Arrival Noise Events 29821 3013 14 0 Arrival Related Noise Events January 2011 Report Generated: 02/14/2011 16:10 -21 - RMT ID City Address Departure Events >= 65dB Departure Events >= 80dB Departure Events >= 90dB Departure Events >_ 100dB 1 Minneapolis Xerxes Ave. & 41st St. 563 7 0 0 2 Minneapolis Fremont Ave. & 43rd St. 721 7 0 0 3 Minneapolis West Elmwood St. & Belmont Ave. 1411 44 7 0 4 Minneapolis Park Ave. & 48th St. 1633 60 0 0 5 Minneapolis 12th Ave. & 58th St. 5041 510 39 0 6 Minneapolis 25th Ave. & 57th St. 7482 1627 178 2 7 Richfield Wentworth Ave. & 64th St. 3449 156 0 0 8 Minneapolis Longfellow Ave. & 43rd St. 2021 109 1 0 9 St. Paul Saratoga St. & Hartford Ave. 2 0 0 0 10 St. Paul Itasca Ave. & Bowdoin St. 2 0 0 0 11 St. Paul Finn St. & Scheffer Ave. 7 0 0 0 12 St. Paul Alton St. & Rockwood Ave. 2 0 0 0 13 Mendota Heights Southeast end of Mohican Court 700 5 0 0 14 Eagan 1st St. & McKee St. 906 48 2 0 15 Mendota Heights Cullon St. & Lexington Ave. 916 14 0 0 16 Eagan Avalon Ave. & Vilas Ln. 908 81 5 0 17 Bloomington 84th St. & 4th Ave. 39 7 3 0 18 Richfield 75th St. & 17th Ave. 1569 61 5 0 19 Bloomington 16th Ave. & 84th St. 594 9 0 0 20 Richfield 75th St. & 3rd Ave. 67 4 0 0 21 Inver Grove Heights Barbara Ave. & 67th St. 134 4 0 0 22 Inver Grove Heights Anne Marie Trail 140 1 0 0 23 Mendota Heights End of Kenndon Ave. 1633 87 8 0 24 Eagan Chapel Ln. & Wren Ln. 594 9 0 0 25 Eagan Moonshine Park 1321 Jurdy Rd. 600 3 0 0 26 Inver Grove Heights 6796 Arkansas Ave. W. 315 13 0 0 27 Minneapolis Anthony School 5757 Irving Ave. S. 1669 43 0 0 28 Richfield 6645 16th Ave. S. 2472 73 0 0 29 Minneapolis Ericsson Elem. School 4315 31st Ave. S. 980 11 0 0 30 Bloomington 8715 River Ridge Rd. 2152 143 2 0 31 Bloomington 9501 12th Ave. S. 233 1 0 0 32 Bloomington 10325 Pleasant Ave. S. 78 0 0 0 33 Burnsville North River Hills Park 275 5 0 0 34 Burnsville Red Oak Park 114 1 0 0 35 Eagan 2100 Garnet Ln. 414 7 0 0 36 Apple Valley Briar Oaks & Scout Pond 147 3 0 0 37 Eagan 4399 Woodgate Ln. N. 183 1 0 0 38 Eagan 3957 Turquoise Cir. 350 4 0 0 39 Eagan 3477 St. Charles PI. 549 17 0 0 Total Departure Noise Events 41065 3175 250 2 Departure Related Noise Events January 2011 - 22 - Report Generated: 02/14/2011 16:10 Date/Time Flight Number Aircraft Type Arrival/ Departure Runway Lmax(dB) 01/27/2011 23:56 DAL1953 MD80 D 30R 84.5 01/24/2011 11:44 DAL2701 MD80 D 30R 84.1 01/10/2011 10:42 DAL2412 DC9Q A 12L 84.1 01/01/2011 0:23 N698SS B72Q A 12L 83.9 01/06/2011 13:32 DAL619 B744 D 30L 83.8 01/10/2011 14:37 DAL2834 DC9Q A 12L 82.8 01/28/2011 17:01 DAL1069 DC9Q A 12L 82.5 01/10/2011 10:07 DAL2233 DC9Q A 12L 82.4 01/10/2011 18:43 DAL2081 MD80 A 12L 82.3 01/05/2011 21:43 PAG917 SW4 D 30R 82.3 Date/Time Flight Number Aircraft Type Arrival/ Departure Runway Lmax(dB) 01/22/2011 15:29 ADB2198 WW24 D 30L 89.8 01/14/2011 13:46 DAL619 B744 D 30L 84.4 01/24/2011 13:50 DAL619 B744 D 30L 83.3 01/25/2011 13:35 DAL619 B744 D 30L 83 01/11/2011 14:24 DAL619 B744 D 30L 82.7 01/27/2011 14:12 DAL619 B744 D 30L 81 01/12/2011 13:30 DAL619 B744 D 30L 80.9 01/18/2011 14:05 DAL619 B744 D 30L 79.7 01/19/2011 13:27 DAL619 B744 D 30L 79.7 01/22/2011 13:36 DAL619 B744 D 30L 79.3 Date/Time Flight Number Aircraft Type Arrival/ Departure Runway Lmax(dB) 01/22/2011 15:29 ADB2198 WW24 D 30L 96.6 01/12/2011 13:29 DAL619 B744 D 30L 92.1 01/11/2011 14:24 DAL619 B744 D 30L 91.6 01/04/2011 13:32 DAL619 B744 D 30L 91.4 01/25/2011 13:35 DAL619 B744 D 30L 91.2 01/24/2011 13:50 DAL619 B744 D 30L 91.1 01/19/2011 13:26 DAL619 B744 D 30L 90.5 01/14/2011 13:45 DAL619 B744 D 30L 89.9 01/27/2011 14:12 DAL619 B744 D 30L 89.7 01/18/2011 14:05 DAL619 B744 D 30L 89.7 Top Ten Loudest Aircraft Noise Events for MSP January 2011 (RMT Site #1) Xerxes Ave. & 41st St., Minneapolis (RMT Site #2) Fremont Ave. & 43rd St., Minneapolis (RMT Site #3) West Elmwood St. & Belmont Ave., Minneapolis Report Generated: 02/14/2011 16:10 34 - 23 - Date/Time Flight Number Aircraft Type Arrival/ Departure Runway Lmax(dB) 01/22/2011 15:28 ADB2198 WW24 D 30L 99.8 01/12/2011 13:29 DAL619 B744 D 30L 96.9 01/06/2011 13:31 DAL619 B744 D 30L 96.4 01/11/2011 14:23 DAL619 B744 D 30L 96.4 01/14/2011 13:45 DAL619 B744 D 30L 96 01/26/2011 13:47 DAL619 B744 D 30L 95.6 01/03/2011 12:22 DAL2218 DC9Q D 30L 94.9 01/04/2011 13:32 DAL619 B744 D 30L 94.6 01/17/2011 17:44 DAL2909 DC9Q D 30L 94.5 01/07/2011 13:45 DAL619 B744 D 30L 94.3 Date/Time Flight Number Aircraft Type Arrival/ Departure Runway Lmax(dB) 01/24/2011 11:43 DAL2701 MD80 D 30R 88.6 01/07/2011 13:45 DAL619 B744 D 30L 88.3 01/27/2011 23:56 DAL1953 MD80 D 30R 88 01/09/2011 19:30 DAL1596 MD80 D 30R 87.6 01/26/2011 13:48 DAL619 B744 D 30L 87.4 01/15/2011 11:37 DAL30 MD80 D 30R 86.5 01/25/2011 14:22 DAL2607 DC9Q D 30R 85.6 01/28/2011 10:49 DAL2233 DC9Q A 12L 84.8 01/03/2011 11:47 DAL2851 DC9Q D 30R 84.7 01/01/2011 12:18 DAL2851 DC9Q D 30R 84.5 Date/Time Flight Number Aircraft Type Arrival/ Departure Runway Lmax(dB) 01/09/2011 16:49 Unknown UKN D 30R 102.5 01/14/2011 14:16 DAL2607 DC9Q D 30R 100.2 01/03/2011 7:06 DAL1490 DC9Q D 30R 98.9 01/06/2011 6:55 DAL2240 DC9Q D 30R 98.7 01/05/2011 14:58 DAL2607 DC9Q D 30R 98.5 01/05/2011 15:34 DAL2834 DC9Q D 30R 98.5 01/27/2011 19:39 DAL2887 DC9Q D 30R 98.3 01/27/2011 14:25 DAL2607 DC9Q D 30R 98.2 01/11/2011 18:57 DAL2207 DC9Q 0 30R 98 01/27/2011 15:30 DAL2834 DC9Q D 30R 97.9 Top Ten Loudest Aircraft Noise Events for MSP January 2011 (RMT Site#4) Park Ave. & 48th St., Minneapolis (RMT Site #5) 12th Ave. & 58th St., Minneapolis (RMT Site #6) 25th Ave. & 57th St., Minneapolis - 24 - 37 Report Generated: 02/14/2011 16:10 Date/Time Flight Number Aircraft Type Arrival/ Departure Runway Lmax(dB) 01/06/2011 6:56 DAL2240 DC9Q D 30R 90.4 01/27/2011 17:41 AAL1151 MD80 D 30R 89.6 01/26/2011 15:24 DAL2834 DC9Q D 30R 89.4 01/01/2011 12:08 AAL1120 MD80 D 30R 88.8 01/27/2011 20:14 DAL1596 MD80 D 30R 87.3 01/01/2011 11:30 DAL30 MD80 D 30R 86.9 01/29/2011 14:32 DAL2607 DC9Q D 30R 86.6 01/14/2011 13:12 DAL1496 MD80 D 30R 86.3 01/27/2011 11:47 AAL1120 MD80 D 30R 86.3 01/05/2011 17:30 AAL1151 MD80 D 30R 86.3 Date/Time Flight Number Aircraft Type Arrival/ Departure Runway Lmax(dB) 01/24/2011 23:07 N104HR B72Q D 30L 89.3 01/15/2011 9:00 AAL1383 MD80 D 30L 88 01/29/2011 7:44 DAL2496 MD80 D 30L 87.7 01/18/2011 14:11 AAL2094 MD80 D 30L 87.6 01/29/2011 7:13 DAL2599 MD80 D 30L 87.4 01/14/2011 9:50 DAL1509 MD80 D 30L 87.4 01/12/2011 13:18 DAL1133 MD80 D 30L 87.1 01/21/2011 7:46 AAL621 MD80 D 30L 87 01/26/2011 13:25 DAL114 MD80 D 30L 87 01/29/2011 5:27 DAL1665 MD80 D 30L 86.8 Date/Time Flight Number Aircraft Type Arrival/ Departure Runway Lmax(dB) 01/24/2011 13:32 DAL1079 B738 A 30R 73.4 01/29/2011 7:34 BMJ48 BE65 D 30R 73 01/12/2011 7:39 BMJ48 BE65 D 30R 70.2 01/07/2011 20:22 DAL1663 MD80 A 30L 68.2 Top Ten Loudest Aircraft Noise Events for MSP January 2011 (RMT Site #7) Wentworth Ave. & 64th St., Richfield (RMT Site #8) Longfellow Ave. & 43rd St., Minneapolis (RMT Site #9) Saratoga St. & Hartford Ave., St. Paul Report Generated: 02/14/2011 16:10 38 - 25 - Date/Time Flight Number Aircraft Type Arrival/ Departure Runway Lmax(dB) 01/24/2011 20:41 AAL1151 MD80 D 30R 75.8 01/07/2011 20:22 DAL1663 MD80 A 30L 75.6 01/24/2011 13:32 DAL1079 B738 A 30R 74.7 01/12/2011 7:38 BMJ48 BE65 D 30R 73.8 01/20/2011 7:15 BMJ48 BE65 D 30R 72.6 01/30/2011 6:55 UAL520 A319 D 30R 71.5 01/15/2011 7:24 BMJ58 BE99 D 30R 69.3 01/25/2011 7:21 BMJ48 BE65 D 30R 66.9 01/18/2011 6:32 N18GB C650 D 30L 66.1 Date/Time Flight Number Aircraft Type Arrival/ Departure Runway Lmax(dB) 01/24/2011 13:32 DAL1079 B738 A 30R 76.4 01/29/2011 7:33 BMJ48 BE65 D 30R 74.7 01/12/2011 7:38 BMJ48 BE65 D 30R 71.1 01/11/2011 7:43 FLG4056 CRJ A 30R 68.6 Date/Time Flight Number Aircraft Type Arrival/ Departure Runway Lmax(dB) 01/26/2011 8:31 DAL2525 B738 A 30R 75.6 01/16/2011 1:58 Unknown UKN D 04 74.4 01/10/2011 11:52 N332DA SR22 D 12L 71.8 Top Ten Loudest Aircraft Noise Events for MSP January 2011 (RMT Site#1 0) Itasca Ave. & Bowdoin St., St. Paul (RMT Site #11) Finn St. & Scheffer Ave., St. Paul (RMT Ste #12) Alton St. & Rockwood Ave., St. Paul - 26 - 39 Report Generated: 02/14/2011 16:10 Date/Time Flight Number Aircraft Type Arrival/ Departure Runway Lmax(dB) 01/13/2011 10:56 DAL30 MD80 D 12L 83 01/23/2011 13:25 DAL619 B744 D 12R 82.7 01/31/2011 11:48 DAL30 MD80 D 12L 81.5 01/31/2011 19:33 AAL1151 MD80 D 12L 80.4 01/10/2011 20:26 DAL2887 DC9Q D 12L 80.1 01/14/2011 18:07 DAL2522 MD90 D 12L 79.9 01/30/2011 19:58 AAL1151 MD80 D 12L 79.4 01/09/2011 11:54 DAL2412 DC9Q D 12L 79.4 01/01/2011 8:39 DAL2198 MD80 D 12L 78.9 01/30/2011 19:27 DAL1596 MD80 D 12L 78.8 Date/Time Flight Number Aircraft Type Arrival/ Departure Runway Lmax(dB) 01/10/2011 14:11 DAL619 B744 D 12R 92.1 01/02/2011 21:12 N698SS B72Q D 12R 90.8 01/30/2011 13:34 DAL619 B744 D 12R 89.8 01/17/2011 13:46 DAL619 B744 D 12R 89.2 01/01/2011 6:35 DAL1276 MD80 D 12R 88.3 01/09/2011 14:46 DAL619 B744 D 12R 87.7 01/28/2011 13:43 DAL619 B744 D 12R 86.7 01/21/2011 11:20 VDA2196 VVW24 D 12R 86.4 01/10/2011 22:49 FDX1106 B72Q D 12R 86.3 01/13/2011 14:33 DAL619 B744 D 12R 85.3 Date/Time Flight Number Aircraft Type Arrival/ Departure Runway Lmax(dB) 01/31/2011 10:08 DAL1597 MD80 D 12L 83 01/13/2011 10:56 DAL30 MD80 D 12L 82.7 01/31/2011 19:05 DAL2064 MD80 D 12L 82.6 01/31/2011 11:48 DAL30 MD80 D 12L 82.4 01/28/2011 11:39 DAL2412 DC9Q D 12L 82.4 01/13/2011 7:41 FDX800 B72Q D 12L 82.1 01/05/2011 7:11 BMJ72 BE65 D 12L 81.8 01/23/2011 14:25 Unknown UKN D 12L 81.7 01/10/2011 14:56 DAL2607 DC9Q D 12L 81.3 01/30/2011 19:58 AAL1151 MD80 D 12L 81 Top Ten Loudest Aircraft Noise Events for MSP January 2011 (RMT Site #13) Southeast end of Mohican Court, Mendota Heights (RMT Site#14) 1st St. & McKee St., Eagan (RMT Site #15) Cu!Ion St. & Lexington Ave., Mendota Heights Report Generated: 02/14/2011 16:10 46 - 27 - Date/Time Flight Number Aircraft Type Arrival/ Departure Runway Lmax(dB) 01/30/2011 13:33 DAL619 B744 D 12R 92.4 01/17/2011 14:30 DAL2607 DC9Q D 12R 92.3 01/10/2011 14:10 DAL619 8744 D 12R 91.7 01/17/2011 13:46 DAL619 B744 D 12R 91.4 01/21/2011 11:19 VDA2196 VVW24 D 12R 90.6 01/31/2011 14:37 DAL1496 MD80 D 12L 89.7 01/21/2011 7:09 VDA2196 VVW24 A 30L 89.4 01/28/2011 13:43 DAL619 B744 D 12R 89.3 01/17/2011 11:07 DAL2106 DC9Q D 12R 88.9 01/31/2011 11:23 DAL2185 MD80 D 12R 88.9 Date/Time Flight Number Aircraft Type Arrival/ Departure Runway Lmax(dB) 01/05/2011 14:05 DAL619 B744 D 22 94.9 01/03/2011 14:04 DAL619 B744 D 22 93.2 01/02/2011 17:11 DAL619A 8744 D 22 91.5 01/05/2011 7:11 BMJ64 BE65 D 17 81.4 01/29/2011 15:13 DAL619 B744 D 22 81.2 01/01/2011 19:21 DAL619A B744 D 22 80.2 01/25/2011 19:02 AAL1213 MD80 D 30L 80 01/25/2011 7:18 BMJ75 BE80 D 17 77.9 01/03/2011 5:16 SCX8910 B738 D 17 76.5 01/25/2011 7:53 FDX645 DC10 D 30L 76.3 Date/Time Flight Number Aircraft Type Arrival/ Departure Runway Lmax(dB) 01/02/2011 17:11 DAL619A B744 D 22 97.6 01/05/2011 14:05 DAL619 B744 D 22 95.9 01/29/2011 15:13 DAL619 B744 D 22 95.7 01/03/2011 14:04 DAL619 B744 D 22 95.3 01/01/2011 19:20 DAL619A B744 D 22 95.2 01/28/2011 15:38 LN81AX LJ25 D 17 87 01/10/2011 14:39 DAL9954 MD80 D 17 86.1 01/17/2011 7:51 DAL1134 DC9Q D 17 86 01/13/2011 14:31 DAL1496 MD80 D 17 84.7 01/13/2011 7:30 DAL1134 DC9Q D 17 83.7 Top Ten Loudest Aircraft Noise Events for MSP January 2011 (RMT Site #16) Avalon Ave. & Vilas Ln., Eagan (RMT Site #17) 84th St. & 4th Ave., Bloomington (RMT Site#18) 75th St. & 17th Ave., Richfield - 28 - ai Report Generated: 02/14/2011 16:10 Date/Time Flight Number Aircraft Type Arrival/ Departure Runway Lmax(dB) 01/05/2011 14:05 DAL619 B744 D 22 84.2 01/03/2011 14:04 DAL619 B744 D 22 82.3 01/28/2011 10:20 DAL2106 DC9Q D 17 81.4 01/02/2011 17:11 DAL619A B744 D 22 81.2 01/10/2011 14:41 DAL2244 DC9Q D 17 81 01/10/2011 10:54 DAL2106 DC9Q D 17 80.8 01/28/2011 13:10 DAL1496 MD80 D 17 80.7 01/28/2011 11:46 DAL114 MD80 D 17 80.2 01/14/2011 16:52 DAL2909 DC9Q D 17 80.2 01/20/2011 6:52 BMJ64 BE65 D 17 79.4 Date/Time Flight Number Aircraft Type Arrival/ Departure Runway Lmax(dB) 01/01/2011 19:21 DAL619A B744 D 22 88.8 01/29/2011 15:13 DAL619 B744 D 22 88.3 01/25/2011 19:02 AAL1213 MD80 D 30L 82.5 01/26/2011 8:12 BMJ64 BE65 D 30L 80 01/25/2011 7:53 FDX645 DC10 D 30L 79.4 01/02/2011 17:11 DAL619A B744 D 22 77 01/02/2011 6:08 DAL1276 B767 D 30L 74.8 01/12/2011 9:10 N636SF LJ31 D 30L 74.4 01/05/2011 14:06 DAL619 B744 D 22 74.2 01/05/2011 9:45 DAL1329 B738 D 30L 74.2 Date/Time Flight Number Aircraft Type Arrival/ Departure Runway Lmax(dB) 01/21/2011 11:21 VDA2196 WW24 D 12R 89.5 01/21/2011 13:37 DAL619 B744 D 12R 81.8 01/13/2011 14:34 DAL619 B744 D 12R 80.9 01/09/2011 14:47 DAL619 B744 D 12R 80 01/16/2011 13:22 DAL619 B744 D 12R 79.7 01/10/2011 14:12 DAL619 B744 D 12R 78.9 01/10/2011 14:57 DAL2607 DC9Q D 12L 78.1 01/31/2011 15:31 DAL2607 DC9Q D 12L 76.8 01/30/2011 19:36 DAL2887 DC9Q D 12L 76.7 01/13/2011 7:42 FDX800 B72Q D 12L 76.2 Top Ten Loudest Aircraft Noise Events for MSP January 2011 (RMT Site #19) 16th Ave. & 84th St., Bloomington (RMT Site #20) 75th St. & 3rd Ave., Richfield (RMT S'te #21) Barbara Ave. & 67th St., Inver Grove Heights Report Generated: 02/14/2011 16:10 *r3, - 29 - Date/Time Flight Number Aircraft Type Arrival/ Departure Runway Lmax(dB) 01/02/2011 21:13 N698SS B72Q D 12R 82.3 01/07/2011 15:40 CPZ5824 E170 A 30R 80.6 01/03/2011 14:57 SCX342 B738 A 30L 78.6 01/18/2011 14:54 DAL2219 A319 A 30L 77.5 01/25/2011 15:37 MES3098 CRJ A 30L 77.3 01/10/2011 22:50 FDX1106 B72Q D 12R 77.1 01/14/2011 15:50 DAL2834 DC9Q D 12L 76.6 01/02/2011 15:58 DAL2556 MD80 D 12R 76.5 01/24/2011 15:38 DAL1206 B757 A 30L 76.5 01/12/2011 7:05 ATN808 DC8Q A 30L 76.2 Date/Time Flight Number Aircraft Type Arrival/ Departure Runway Lmax(dB) 01/28/2011 11:39 DAL2412 DC9Q D 12L 95 01/01/2011 7:15 DAL1490 DC9Q D 12L 93.1 01/10/2011 16:02 DAL2834 DC9Q D 12L 90.9 01/31/2011 10:08 DAL1597 MD80 D 12L 90.8 01/10/2011 14:56 DAL2607 DC9Q D 12L 90.6 01/01/2011 8:38 DAL2198 MD80 D 12L 90.5 01/30/2011 13:58 DAL2607 DC9Q D 12L 90.5 01/10/2011 12:02 DAL2412 DC9Q D 12L 90.3 01/26/2011 22:59 FDX1106 B72Q D 12L 89.7 01/30/2011 19:35 DAL2887 DC9Q D 12L 89.6 Date/Time Flight Number Aircraft Type Arrival/ Departure Runway Lmax(dB) 01/02/2011 21:13 N698SS B72Q D 12R 85.1 01/27/2011 16:30 DAL2746 DC9Q A 30R 83.1 01/10/2011 22:49 FDX1106 B72Q D 12R 82.2 01/28/2011 13:43 DAL619 B744 D 12R 82.2 01/01/2011 6:33 DAL2513 MD80 D 12R 81.2 01/01/2011 6:36 DAL1276 MD80 D 12R 80.5 01/31/2011 14:05 DAL619 B744 D 12R 80.5 01/02/2011 15:57 DAL2556 MD80 D 12R 80.4 01/04/2011 22:29 FDX1106 B72Q D 12R 80.1 01/13/2011 20:12 DAL2088 MD80 D 12L 80.1 Top Ten Loudest Aircraft Noise Events for MSP January 2011 (RMT Site#22) Anne Marie Trail, Inver Grove Heights (RMT Site #23) End of Kenndon Ave., Mendota Heights (RMT Sie #24) Chapel Ln. & Wren Ln., Eagan - 30 - 43 Report Generated: 02/14/2011 16:10 Date/Time Flight Number Aircraft Type Arrival/ Departure Runway Lmax(dB) 01/31/2011 11:24 DAL2185 MD80 D 12R 81.4 01/13/2011 14:32 DAL1496 MD80 D 17 81.1 01/31/2011 22:41 FDX1106 B72Q D 12R 81.1 01/31/2011 14:30 AAL2094 MD80 D 12R 79 01/13/2011 7:31 DAL1134 DC9Q D 17 79 01/28/2011 13:43 DAL619 B744 D 12R 78.9 01/31/2011 10:37 DAL1509 MD80 D 12R 78.5 01/31/2011 12:25 DAL114 MD80 D 12R 77.7 01/31/2011 11:21 AAL1914 MD80 D 12R 77.6 01/13/2011 20:38 DAL41 MD90 D 12R 77.5 Date/Time Flight Number Aircraft Type Arrival/ Departure Runway Lmax(dB) 01/17/2011 16:52 AAL546 MD80 D 30L 85 01/24/2011 12:57 DAL114 MD80 D 30L 84.7 01/30/2011 17:24 XATWH LJ25 D 30L 84.6 01/03/2011 9:26 DAL1009 MD80 D 30L 84.3 01/03/2011 9:06 AAL1383 MD80 D 30L 84.2 01/05/2011 19:19 Unknown UKN D 30L 84.2 01/18/2011 9:31 DAL1509 MD80 D 30L 83.8 01/14/2011 11:44 DAL114 MD80 D 30L 83.6 01/18/2011 9:09 AAL1383 MD80 D 30L 83.6 01/11/2011 9:34 AAL1383 MD80 D 30L 83.4 Date/Time Flight Number Aircraft Type Arrival/ Departure Runway Lmax(dB) 01/21/2011 11:20 VDA2196 VWV24 D 12R 89.4 01/17/2011 13:46 DAL619 B744 D 12R 83.5 01/13/2011 14:34 DAL619 8744 D 12R 83.1 01/09/2011 14:47 DAL619 B744 D 12R 83 01/10/2011 14:11 DAL619 B744 D 12R 82.7 01/21/2011 13:37 DAL619 B744 D 12R 82.5 01/02/2011 21:13 N698SS B72Q D 12R 82.3 01/26/2011 23:00 FDX1106 B72Q D 12L 81.2 01/10/2011 14:57 DAL2607 DC9Q D 12L 80.7 01/10/2011 20:51 DAL1596 MD80 D 12R 80.6 Top Ten Loudest Aircraft Noise Events for MSP January 2011 (RMT Site #25) Moonshine Park 1321 Jurdy Rd., Eagan (RMT Site#26) 6796 Arkansas Ave. W., Inver Grove Heights (RMT S'te #27) Anthony School 5757 Irving Ave. S., Minneapolis Report Generated: 02/14/2011 16:10 4)1 - 31 - Date/Time Flight Number Aircraft Type Arrival/ Departure Runway Lmax(dB) 01/28/2011 15:38 LN81AX LJ25 D 17 89 01/25/2011 19:02 AAL1213 MD80 D 30L 88.4 01/09/2011 10:26 DAL2807 DC9Q D 17 85.6 01/12/2011 9:03 AAL1383 MD80 D 30L 85 01/09/2011 10:53 DAL2106 DC9Q D 17 84.9 01/28/2011 11:12 DAL2807 DC9Q D 17 84.9 01/13/2011 14:24 DAL2607 DC9Q D 17 84.6 01/16/2011 15:24 DAL2834 DC9Q D 17 84.2 01/17/2011 7:50 DAL1134 DC9Q D 17 83.8 01/10/2011 14:40 DAL2244 DC9Q D 17 83.6 Date/Time Flight Number Aircraft Type Arrival/ Departure Runway Lmax(dB) 01/04/2011 15:49 DAL2909 DC9Q D 17 93.1 01/27/2011 10:27 DAL2106 DC9Q D 17 90.9 01/14/2011 16:52 DAL2909 DC9Q D 17 89.2 01/03/2011 6:42 DAL2513 MD80 D 17 89.1 01/10/2011 11:16 AAL1914 MD80 D 17 88.6 01/05/2011 10:31 DAL2106 DC9Q D 17 88.5 01/27/2011 7:33 AAL621 MD80 D 17 88.4 01/28/2011 14:14 AAL2094 MD80 D 17 88.2 01/05/2011 10:53 DAL2807 DC9Q D 17 88.2 01/13/2011 11:47 DAL1509 MD80 D 17 88 Date/Time Flight Number Aircraft Type Arrival/ Departure Runway Lmax(dB) 01/25/2011 13:36 DAL1496 MD80 D 30R 85.7 01/04/2011 11:47 AAL1120 MD80 D 30R 82.7 01/07/2011 7:01 BMJ54 BE65 D 30R 82.5 01/01/2011 11:30 DAL30 MD80 D 30R 81.9 01/03/2011 14:19 DAL2698 DC9Q D 30R 81.9 01/26/2011 17:33 AAL1151 MD80 D 30R 81 01/07/2011 6:58 BMJ48 BE65 D 30R 80.8 01/05/2011 12:09 AAL1120 MD80 D 30R 80.6 01/21/2011 7:23 BMJ72 BE65 D 30R 80.4 01/06/2011 7:00 BMJ48 BE65 D 30R 80.3 Top Ten Loudest Aircraft Noise Events for MSP January 2011 (RMT Site #28) 6645 16th Ave. S., Richfield (RMT Site #29) Ericsson Elem. School 4315 31st Ave. S., Minneapolis - 32 - (RMT Ste #30) 8715 River Ridge Rd., Bloomington 4-5 Report Generated: 02/14/2011 16:10 Date/Time Flight Number Aircraft Type Arrival/ Departure Runway Lmax(dB) 01/28/2011 9:03 AAL1383 MD80 D 17 80.9 01/13/2011 14:48 AAL2094 MD80 D 17 79.5 01/10/2011 11:17 AAL1914 MD80 D 17 78.8 01/02/2011 11:21 AAL1914 MD80 D 17 77.8 01/28/2011 7:45 BMJ14 BE65 D 17 77.4 01/21/2011 6:32 UAL243 A319 D 17 77.3 01/02/2011 9:02 AAL1383 MD80 D 17 77.3 01/04/2011 9:19 AAL1383 MD80 D 17 77.3 01/14/2011 21:18 DAL41 A320 D 17 77 01/27/2011 10:45 AAL1914 MD80 D 17 77 Date/Time Flight Number Aircraft Type Arrival/ Departure Runway Lmax(dB) 01/27/2011 7:33 AAL621 MD80 D 17 81.4 01/28/2011 14:15 AAL2094 MD80 D 17 81.3 01/20/2011 7:25 AAL621 MD80 D 17 80.2 01/14/2011 14:23 AAL2094 MD80 D 17 80.2 01/28/2011 7:17 AAL621 MD80 D 17 80.1 01/26/2011 19:15 AAL1213 MD80 D 17 79.5 01/05/2011 7:33 DAL1709 MD80 D 17 79.4 01/04/2011 7:28 DAL1709 MD80 D 17 78.7 01/13/2011 19:28 AAL1213 MD80 D 17 78.7 01/25/2011 7:30 DAL1709 MD80 D 17 78.3 Date/Time Flight Number Aircraft Type Arrival/ Departure Runway Lmax(dB) 01/14/2011 21:19 DAL41 A320 D 17 74.4 01/20/2011 22:14 FDX1106 B72Q D 30L 73.4 01/13/2011 14:49 AAL2094 MD80 D 17 72.7 01/05/2011 11:11 AAL1914 MD80 D 17 72.5 01/04/2011 9:19 AAL1383 MD80 D 17 72.5 01/25/2011 17:17 DAL1551 A320 D 17 72.3 01/20/2011 7:57 ATN808 DC8Q D 17 72.1 01/10/2011 11:17 AAL1914 MD80 D 17 72 01/26/2011 17:23 DAL1551 A320 D 17 71.9 01/05/2011 11:56 DAL2115 A320 D 17 71.8 Top Ten Loudest Aircraft Noise Events for MSP January 2011 Report Generated: 02/14/2011 16:10 (RMT Site #31) 9501 12th Ave. S., Bloomington (RMT Site #32) 10325 Pleasant Ave. S., Bloomington (RMT Ste #33) North River Hills Park, Burnsville - 33 - Date/Time Flight Number Aircraft Type Arrival/ Departure Runway Lmax(dB) 01/04/2011 7:34 FDX800 B72Q D 17 82.7 01/25/2011 7:48 FDX800 B72Q D 17 81.9 01/27/2011 7:39 FDX800 B72Q D 17 80.1 01/05/2011 19:59 PAG917 SW4 A 35 80.1 01/24/2011 15:07 SWA2913 B735 A 30L 79.1 01/01/2011 11:02 DAL2390 DC9Q D 17 79 01/25/2011 11:45 DAL114 MD80 D 17 78.7 01/05/2011 10:32 DAL2106 DC9Q D 17 78.4 01/05/2011 12:04 DAL114 MD80 D 17 78.4 01/03/2011 6:43 DAL2513 MD80 D 17 78 Date/Time Flight Number Aircraft Type Arrival/ Departure Runway Lmax(dB) 01/01/2011 9:54 DAL1009 MD80 D 17 84.7 01/01/2011 11:47 DAL114 MD80 D 17 84.1 01/09/2011 13:59 DAL1496 MD80 D 17 82.9 01/26/2011 19:57 DAL2249 DC9Q D 17 81.4 01/02/2011 6:59 DAL2513 MD80 D 17 81.2 01/02/2011 20:35 AAL1213 MD80 D 17 80.6 01/05/2011 12:04 DAL114 MD80 D 17 80 01/04/2011 7:33 FDX800 B72Q D 17 79.2 01/16/2011 11:37 DAL114 MD80 D 17 79 01/24/2011 7:38 DAL1709 MD80 D 17 78.9 Date/Time Flight Number Aircraft Type Arrival/ Departure Runway Lmax(dB) 01/20/2011 7:37 FDX800 B72Q D 17 81.6 01/05/2011 12:04 DAL114 MD80 D 17 76.7 01/20/2011 7:42 UPS2557 MD11 D 17 76.4 01/28/2011 12:24 N874RA GLF3 D 17 76.3 01/24/2011 9:00 AAL1383 MD80 D 17 75.7 01/28/2011 14:16 AAL2094 MD80 D 17 75.6 01/25/2011 15:49 DAL2909 DC9Q D 17 74.4 01/03/2011 6:43 DAL2513 MD80 D 17 73.9 01/20/2011 7:25 AAL621 MD80 D 17 73.8 01/21/2011 14:10 AAL2094 MD80 D 17 73.5 Top Ten Loudest Aircraft Noise Events for MSP January 2011 (RMT Site #34) Red Oak Park, Burnsville (RMT Site#35) 2100 Garnet Ln., Eagan (RMT Sie #36) Briar Oaks & Scout Pond, Apple Valley - 34 - 4l Report Generated: 02/14/2011 16:10 Date/Time Flight Number Aircraft Type Arrival/ Departure Runway Lmax(dB) 01/13/2011 15:05 EJA647 C56X D 17 88.7 01/02/2011 17:35 DAL1054 MD80 D 17 81.4 01/05/2011 7:33 FDX800 B72Q D 17 80.4 01/17/2011 14:13 DAL114 MD80 D 17 80.4 01/28/2011 10:43 AAL1914 MD80 D 17 79.9 01/09/2011 11:37 DAL114 MD80 D 17 79.6 01/28/2011 15:39 LN81AX LJ25 D 17 79.5 01/21/2011 12:11 DAL114 MD80 D 17 79.4 01/13/2011 18:18 DAL2064 MD80 D 17 79.1 01/13/2011 9:01 AAL1383 MD80 D 17 78.9 Date/Time Flight Number Aircraft Type Arrival/ Departure Runway Lmax(dB) 01/02/2011 11:36 DAL1564 MD80 D 17 83.5 01/13/2011 14:26 DAL2607 DC9Q D 17 83.5 01/10/2011 10:43 DAL2096 MD80 D 17 83 01/13/2011 17:43 AAL1151 MD80 D 17 82.6 01/28/2011 13:11 DAL1496 MD80 D 17 82.5 01/09/2011 10:51 DAL30 MD80 D 17 82.1 01/10/2011 11:06 DAL30 MD80 D 17 81.9 01/02/2011 13:49 DAL1496 MD80 D 17 81.6 01/14/2011 18:31 AAL1151 MD80 D 17 81 01/28/2011 11:54 AAL1120 MD80 D 17 80.9 Date/Time Flight Number Aircraft Type Arrival/ Departure Runway Lmax(dB) 01/02/2011 17:35 DAL1054 MD80 D 17 80.3 01/14/2011 16:53 DAL2909 DC9Q D 17 78.9 01/02/2011 15:56 DAL2909 DC9Q D 17 78.8 01/09/2011 13:59 DAL1496 MD80 D 17 78.5 01/28/2011 10:43 AAL1914 MD80 D 17 78.3 01/17/2011 14:15 DAL2807 DC9Q D 17 78.1 01/13/2011 18:20 DAL2249 DC9Q D 17 77.9 01/05/2011 7:34 FDX800 B72Q D 17 77.3 01/16/2011 11:37 DAL114 MD80 D 17 77.1 01/01/2011 11:47 DAL114 MD80 D 17 76.9 Top Ten Loudest Aircraft Noise Events for MSP January 2011 (RMT Site #37) 4399 Woodgate Ln. N., Eagan (RMT Site #38) 3957 Turquoise Cir., Eagan Report Generated: 02/14/2011 16:10 (RMT Site #39) 3477 St. Charles PI., Eagan January 2011 Remote Monitoring Tower Top Ten Summary The top ten noise events and the event ranges at each RMT for January 2011 were comprised of 93.5% departure operations. The predominant top ten aircraft type was the MD80 with 37.6% of the highest Lmax events. January 2011 Technical Advisor Report Notes Unknown fields are due to unavailability of Multilateration flight track data. 4e - 35 - Date #1 #2 #3 #4 #5 #6 #7 #8 #9 #10 #11 #12 #13 #14 #15 01/01/2011 47.6 55.7 56 57.2 62.4 66.4 54.7 54.7 NA NA NA NA 46.1 59.6 46.7 01/02/2011 52.1 53.5 61.6 54.1 64.8 64.3 40.5 49.5 NA NA NA NA 54.3 57.3 55.1 01/03/2011 50 50.6 58.2 56.5 65.8 68.4 60.4 58.9 NA NA NA NA 25.5 55.9 35 01/04/2011 47.5 54.6 57.3 57 63.4 66.1 54.2 55.1 NA NA NA NA 52.7 57.3 52.4 01/05/2011 50.9 53.6 56.9 57 64.2 67.8 58.8 57.3 NA 42.2 NA NA 43.3 59.1 52 01/06/2011 48.3 52.4 54.7 56 64.2 70.7 59.6 61.8 26.6 NA NA 36.5 NA 53.4 41.1 01/07/2011 48.3 50.6 56 56.6 61.7 67.2 58.9 54.7 36.5 NA 36.7 NA NA 56 28.4 01/08/2011 45.3 47.5 52 52 62.5 65.1 58.7 51.9 NA NA NA NA NA 49.6 43.7 01/09/2011 47.4 55.6 56.8 56.3 62.7 66.5 52.1 52.7 NA NA NA NA 48.4 53 51.6 01/10/2011 55.4 58.8 63.8 58.5 66.3 64.7 38.8 41.5 NA NA NA 31.3 55.7 61.9 57.2 01/11/2011 55.1 53.6 61.9 58 67.1 67.1 60.8 55.7 NA 27.7 NA NA 50.5 57.3 49.9 01/12/2011 48.1 50.3 57 54.5 64.7 65.9 60.2 55.5 32.8 32.9 33.7 NA 48.8 59.5 50.5 01/13/2011 53.2 58.2 61.1 58.7 64.4 65.7 38.2 41.5 NA NA NA NA 55.7 60.9 58.1 01/14/2011 51.9 55.9 58 57.9 64.6 68.4 58.9 57 NA NA 32.8 NA 44.1 57.8 45.8 01/15/2011 43.3 44.1 51.7 51.6 61.7 64.3 60.2 51.6 NA NA 26.9 NA 32.9 51 36.8 01/16/2011 51.7 55 61.1 55.8 64.5 63.2 47 47.8 NA NA NA 45.1 50.8 53 55.3 01/17/2011 52.3 55.7 60 58.6 65.5 67.4 59.3 54.2 NA NA NA NA 49.7 58.3 52.9 01/18/2011 49.5 51.5 55.1 56.2 63.5 66.9 60.5 57.5 NA NA 36.3 NA NA 53.1 30.1 01/19/2011 44.5 47.1 53 53.4 63.3 66.1 58.6 55.7 NA NA NA 36.2 41.1 54.4 38.7 01/20/2011 45.3 47.3 54 52 63.2 66.2 58.3 55.2 NA 32.3 34.2 31.5 26.5 54.9 38.3 01/21/2011 47.4 54.6 60.6 55.9 65.5 66.3 56.1 52.6 NA NA NA NA 53 58.8 53.4 01/22/2011 49.7 46.7 56 53.2 62.2 64.6 58 54.4 NA NA NA NA NA 50 34.2 01/23/2011 49.3 54.1 61.1 55 64.7 62.8 32.3 34.3 NA NA NA NA 50.9 53.1 53.4 01/24/2011 51.4 53.1 60.2 56.8 66.6 66.3 62.3 54.6 33.5 37.3 37.6 NA 42.7 57.1 46.5 01/25/2011 47.8 50.6 53.5 55.5 61 65.7 58.6 55 NA NA 25.2 NA 39 56.3 35.1 01/26/2011 51.2 53.9 57.4 56.3 64.2 66.8 59 56.7 NA NA NA 35.8 54.1 60.3 55.1 01/27/2011 52.3 56 56.8 60.4 63.1 70.4 59 56.9 NA NA NA NA 41.5 58 46.1 01/28/2011 54.3 57 62.5 59.3 66.7 66.6 54.6 49.6 NA NA NA NA 49.9 59.5 53.8 01/29/2011 47.7 49.7 52.3 55.1 63.9 66.7 62 56.7 33.5 35.2 NA NA NA 55.7 32.6 01/30/2011 53.3 53.7 61.9 54.9 65.9 64.7 58.2 54.5 NA NA 42.3 NA 52.3 56.9 55.6 01/31/2011 53.9 58.6 63.1 58.7 65.9 65 45.7 39 NA NA NA NA 53.3 60.8 55.8 Mo.DNL 50.9 54.2 59.1 56.6 64.5 66.6 58.1 55.1 25.7 29.8 31.1 31.9 49.7 57.5 51.8 - 36 - Analysis of Aircraft Noise Events DNL January 2011 Remote Monitoring Towers 4 9 Report Generated: 02/14/2011 16:10 Date #16 #17 #18 #19 #20 #21 #22 #23 #24 #25 #26 #27 #28 #29 01/01/2011 61.3 41.7 54 41.4 49 37 50.8 56.5 55.8 44.6 51 48.5 50.2 47.6 01/02/2011 58.1 50.8 57.4 49.9 46 45.9 47.7 60.3 53.4 46.6 51.5 31.6 49.9 41.3 01/03/2011 62.5 52.7 55.8 49.1 43.6 NA 52.2 44.6 55.4 34.3 37.9 55.7 57.4 52.3 01/04/2011 63.3 30.5 51.7 46.6 NA 41.4 50.5 58.4 57.4 45.4 50.4 51.4 52.3 50.6 01/05/2011 61.7 53.6 55.4 48.6 40.2 37.3 51.4 59.3 57.1 41.2 51.1 55.6 55.5 50.6 01/06/2011 58.7 NA 32.1 36.7 25.3 33.5 46.3 46.7 54.3 34.5 40.5 54.9 55.7 51.9 01/07/2011 62.1 NA 37.9 42.4 NA NA 50.4 45 55.9 27 39.9 49.3 54.1 53.7 01/08/2011 59.1 38.1 34.8 NA NA 33.4 45.4 47.3 49 NA 39.6 52.8 50 45.4 01/09/2011 56.4 43.4 50.8 46.7 43.5 42.7 41.9 56.3 47.3 41.8 47.3 51.2 52.5 38.9 01/10/2011 63.9 NA 55.4 51.4 NA 46.7 53.6 62.4 58.4 53 52.1 37.1 55.8 30.5 01/11/2011 62.4. NA 38.1 38.4 NA 41.8 51.6 55.9 55.6 45.5 48.5 55.2 57 49.6 01/12/2011 64.4 NA 38.8 31.2 35.4 36.7 51.5 58.1 57.5 51.3 49.5 55 55.5 49.7 01/13/2011 64.3 NA 56.7 50.9 NA 46.3 50.9 62.9 57.5 53.7 53.5 NA 54.8 NA 01/14/2011 63.4 30.5 52.7 47.3 37.2 38.8 53.4 54.2 57.6 42.6 44.9 54.7 56.8 52.4 01/15/2011 59.4 46.2 38 31.3 42.9 NA 45.2 49.3 50.7 39.9 36 51.9 55.1 46.8 01/16/2011 54.7 NA 54.5 49.1 NA 45.1 36.2 57.9 46.9 45.9 49.1 45.7 52.1 NA 01/17/2011 62.5 NA 52.9 48 38.2 43 51 57.6 56.6 46.4 50.5 54.1 55.7 47.3 01/18/2011 59.4 32.1 36.3 NA 34.8 35.2 48.9 45.8 53 29.7 36.9 54.5 55.3 48.6 01/19/2011 58 NA 39.3 38.9 NA NA 48.2 50.6 52.8 29.2 48.1 54.6 53.4 48.8 01/20/2011 62 43 48.5 49.8 36.3 30.3 49.7 43.6 53.6 32.2 35.7 51.7 53.3 51.6 01/21/2011 62.8 47.3 53.1 48.3 48.6 49.8 50.5 59.5 56.5 47.7 52.3 48.2 52 51.2 01/22/2011 59.8 NA NA NA 28.4 NA 42.5 NA 50.4 37.3 26.5 46.8 49.4 43 01/23/2011 55.3 NA 53.9 46.9 31 38.1 28.6 57.8 47.9 46.2 46.2 NA 50.1 27.2 01/24/2011 62.1 NA 48.9 43.5 34.2 36.4 50.5 55.1 54.7 45 51.7 54.2 57.5 49.4 01/25/2011 62.8 44.3 53.3 49 44.9 NA 51.7 42.6 55.4 40.7 38.3 52.2 54.2 51.1 01/26/2011 62 31.1 49.1 44.4 40.4 44.5 51 62.2 57.5 48.2 54.1 53.4 53.6 49.2 01/27/2011 63.2 45 53.5 53.5 39.4 NA 52 54.3 57.8 31.4 45.8 54 55.2 50.2 01/28/2011 63.2 NA 56.7 52 NA 40.3 51.8 59.5 57.9 53.3 45.3 53.5 57.7 43.3 01/29/2011 62.3 40.9 53.2 39.8 47.7 NA 52.9 39.3 55.2 NA 31.5 54.3 56.6 49.1 01/30/2011 61.1 39.6 51.4 50.1 36.6 42.2 47.9 60.3 52.6 47.2 47.6 54.7 55.4 47.6 01/31/2011 64.4 NA 28.2 NA NA 46.1 48.8 61.3 56.4 56 51.2 30.1 50.2 NA Mo.DNL 61.8 44 52.3 47.4 41.2 41.7 50.2 57.4 55.4 47.5 48.8 52.6 54.7 48.8 Report Generated: 02/14/2011 16:10 Analysis of Aircraft Noise Events DNL January 2011 Remote Monitoring Towers -37- Date #30 #31 #32 #33 #34 #35 #36 #37 #38 #39 01/01/2011 51.1 37.5 30.8 29.2 34.2 48.1 46.3 42 38.2 NA 01/02/2011 60.7 44.7 38.9 44.9 33.8 53.9 46.9 46.2 47.8 50.7 01/03/2011 60 41.9 NA 44.9 45.5 51.5 52.2 NA NA NA 01/04/2011 59.2 42.4 36.6 44.8 39.4 51 48.7 31.6 39.3 43.7 01/05/2011 58 43.9 39.7 46.6 41.2 48.9 49.5 42.9 45 44.8 01/06/2011 42.1 NA NA NA 28.2 43.6 49 NA NA NA 01/07/2011 46.9 41.6 28.4 40.2 28.4 47.1 51.2 NA NA NA 01/08/2011 40.9 37.7 40.6 NA 30.7 40 48.1 NA NA NA 01/09/2011 59.2 45.4 29.1 37 33.9 47.8 47.6 42.4 46.1 47.9 01/10/2011 59.1 46.3 39 42.4 26.5 41.7 31.4 45.8 49.1 51.6 01/11/2011 47.7 NA NA 41.8 25.9 48.9 50.3 NA NA 45.5 01/12/2011 47 34.1 NA NA NA 46.6 50 NA 28.1 26.3 01/13/2011 58.7 43.7 34.2 44.8 38.9 44 37.2 44.3 50.2 51.3 01/14/2011 57.2 44 39.6 44.4 41.7 51.5 47.3 42.4 43.8 45.5 01/15/2011 41.3 32.4 42 NA 24.5 43 47.3 28 NA 37.9 01/16/2011 58.8 43.6 44.8 40.5 NA 44.1 35.2 42 43.7 47.9 01/17/2011 56.6 38.1 NA 44.4 29.9 40.7 41.9 41.1 46.6 46.6 01/18/2011 42.8 NA 37.4 NA 34.5 42.9 49.3 NA NA NA 01/19/2011 48.6 NA NA NA 30.6 46.2 49.8 NA NA NA 01/20/2011 57 36.5 44.8 44.9 44.7 50.8 49.2 42.5 NA NA 01/21/2011 57.9 49.6 42.9 41.8 34.9 43.1 44.3 42.5 46.5 49.5 01/22/2011 39.8 NA NA NA NA 36.7 47.2 NA 37.1 NA 01/23/2011 55.5 35.4 NA 41.6 33.4 37.8 NA 42 44.5 46.5 01/24/2011 52.9 31 NA 42.5 37.3 46.6 47.5 34.4 39.7 44.9 01/25/2011 60.1 44.8 40.6 46.2 41.5 52.6 50.3 29.9 33.3 NA 01/26/2011 55.4 43.6 37.2 41.2 40.1 47 48.2 37.6 40.6 42.6 01/27/2011 61.2 49 43.3 49.5 44.4 49.4 48.6 NA NA NA 01/28/2011 59.2 45.6 27.5 47.5 41.5 46.6 32.5 46.3 49.4 51.9 01/29/2011 42.9 NA NA NA 28 42.3 46.8 NA NA NA 01/30/2011 43.7 49.3 NA 44.9 48.7 43.2 48 NA NA NA 01/31/2011 35.5 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA Mo.DNL 56.4 43.1 38 42.8 39.5 47.7 47.8 40 43 45.2 - 38 - Analysis of Aircraft Noise Events DNL January 2011 Remote Monitoring Towers �l Report Generated: 02/14/2011 16:10 1/1/2011 - 1/31/2011 Runway 17 Departure Analysis Report Minneapolis -St. Paul International Airport This report is for informational purposes only and cannot be used for entorcement purposes 5 3274 Carrier Jets Departed Runway 17 - 1/1/2011 - 1/31/2011 Runway 17 Departure Overflight Grid Analysis ii g ming .. ,, i / L : . ' ' ' ' ' 61 . :174 r 1 k . .0111 erdi ' Ail .i1IJP q Aj p . _ d 1 ► 1 ti � 4 : ; r .� '. � PP 4 f'l •r. ®.cLy ®e .rma:.k.., :Insrire mg =.w'. Metropolitan Airports Commission Runway 17 Departure Analysis Report - 1/1/2011 - 1/31/2011. Report Generated: 02/14/2011 10:06 - 1 - Runway 17 Carrier Jet Departure Operations - 1/1/2011-1/31/2011 252 (99.3 %) West bound Carrier Jet Departure Operations flying the Runway 17 Jet Departure Procedure ( passing over the 2.5 NM turn point) and Runway 17 eastbound Carrier Jet Departure Operations 22 (0.7 %) Carrier Jet Departure Operations turned west before passing over the Runway 17 2.5 NM turn point. This is 1.7% of 1288 westbound departures natirxal Airport Gate Pia rsd" t Bef 2 SKIM Turn 1 11i1 2 ft= 2:2(100"%); Rlght = p( dor inneapalis -St. Pau 7 Departures Th "a 3J1 2 f11 0t:'t -_ ses Gate: Metropolitan Airports Commission Runway 17 Departure Analysis Report - 1/1/2011- 1/31/2011. Report Generated: 02/14/2011 10:06 - 2 - Stf 0 (0 %) Westbound Carrier Jet Departures turned west between 2.5 and 3.0 NM from start of takeoff and remained over the Minnesota River Valley (trending with Runway 17 River Departure Heading) 3 (25 %) Westbound Carrier Jet Departures turned west after 3.0 NM from start of takeoff and remained over the Minnesota River Valley (trending with Runway 17 River Departure Procedure) 0 (0 %) Carrier Jet Departures turned west before passing over the Runway 17 2.5 NM turn point 1 (8.3 %) Remaining westbound Carrier Jet Departures flew the Runway 17 Jet Departure Procedure (passing over the 2.5 NM turn point), and with an enroute heading to the destination airport Carrier Jet Departure Operations 8 (66.7 %) Other Nighttime Runway 17 Nighttime Carrier Jet Departure Operations - 1/1/2011 - 1/31/2011 12 Nighttime Carrier Jet Departure Operations off of Runway 17 in 1/1/2011 - 1/31/2011 (10:30 p.m. - 6:00 a.m.) Metropolitan Airports Commission Runway 17 Departure Analysis Report - 1/1/2011 - 1/31/2011. Report Generated: 02/14/2011 10:06 - 3 - Remote Monitoring Tower (RMT) Site Locations est St Pa LEGEND 0 Existing RMTs Runway 17-35 RMT's Metropolitan Airports Commission Runway 17 Departure Analysis Report - 1/1/2011- 1/31/2011. Report Generated: 02/14/2011 10:06 - 4 - SCp Date #30 #31 #32 #33 #34 #35 #36 #37 #38 #39 1 51.1 37.5 30.8 29.2 34.2 48.1 46.3 42 38.2 NA 2 60.7 44.7 38.9 44.9 33.8 53.9 46.9 46.2 47.8 50.7 3 60 41.9 NA 44.9 45.5 51.5 52.2 NA NA NA 4 59.2 42.4 36.6 44.8 39.4 51 48.7 31.6 39.3 43.7 5 58 43.9 39.7 46.6 41.2 48.9 49.5 42.9 45 44.8 6 42.1 NA NA NA 28.2 43.6 49 NA NA NA 7 46.9 41.6 28.4 40.2 28.4 47.1 51.2 NA NA NA 8 40.9 37.7 40.6 NA 30.7 40 48.1 NA NA NA 9 59.2 45.4 29.1 37 33.9 47.8 47.6 42.4 46.1 47.9 10 59.1 46.3 39 42.4 26.5 41.7 31.4 45.8 49.1 51.6 11 47.7 NA NA 41.8 25.9 48.9 50.3 NA NA 45.5 12 47 34.1 NA NA NA 46.6 50 NA 28.1 26.3 13 58.7 43.7 34.2 44.8 38.9 44 37.2 44.3 50.2 51.3 14 57.2 44 39.6 44.4 41.7 51.5 47.3 42.4 43.8 45.5 15 41.3 32.4 42 NA 24.5 43 47.3 28 NA 37.9 16 58.8 43.6 44.8 40.5 NA 44.1 35.2 42 43.7 47.9 17 56.6 38.1 NA 44.4 29.9 40.7 41.9 41.1 46.6 46.6 18 42.8 NA 37.4 NA 34.5 42.9 49.3 NA NA NA 19 48.6 NA NA NA 30.6 46.2 49.8 NA NA NA 20 57 36.5 44.8 44.9 44.7 50.8 49.2 42.5 NA NA 21 57.9 49.6 42.9 41.8 34.9 43.1 44.3 42.5 46.5 49.5 22 39.8 NA NA NA NA 36.7 47.2 NA 37.1 NA 23 55.5 35.4 NA 41.6 33.4 37.8 NA 42 44.5 46.5 24 52.9 31 NA 42.5 37.3 46.6 47.5 34.4 39.7 44.9 25 60.1 44.8 40.6 46.2 41.5 52.6 50.3 29.9 33.3 NA 26 55.4 43.6 37.2 41.2 40.1 47 48.2 37.6 40.6 42.6 27 61.2 49 43.3 49.5 44.4 49.4 48.6 NA NA NA 28 59.2 45.6 27.5 47.5 41.5 46.6 32.5 46.3 49.4 51.9 29 42.9 NA NA NA 28 42.3 46.8 NA NA NA 30 43.7 49.3 NA 44.9 48.7 43.2 48 NA NA NA 31 35.5 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA Av. DNL 56.4 43.1 38 42.8 39.5 47.7 47.8 40 43 45.2 Analysis of Aircraft Noise Levels - DNL dBA 1/1/2011-1/31/2011 Metropolitan Airports Commission Runway 17 Departure Analysis Report - 1/1/2011- 1/31/2011. Report Generated: 02/14/2011 10:06 - 5 - 57 Airport City Heading (deg.) #Ops Percent of Total Ops ORD CHICAGO (O'HARE) 124° 187 5.7% DEN DENVER 237° 174 5.3% MDW CHICAGO (MIDWAY) 124° 166 5.1% ATL ATLANTA 149° 125 3.8% DFW DALLAS/ FORT WORTH 193° 125 3.8% PHX PHOENIX 231° 114 3.5% MKE MILWAUKEE 114° 98 3% IAN HOUSTON 185° 89 2.7% STL ST LOUIS 160° 73 2.2% CLT CHARLOTTE 133° 71 2.2% EWR NEW YORK 106° 68 2.1% LGA NEW YORK (LA GUARDIA) 105° 67 2% LAS LAS VEGAS 243° 65 2% CVG CINCINNATI 127° 61 1.9% CLE CLEVELAND 109° 60 1.8% RMT Aircraft DNL Aircraft DNL Aircraft DNL Aircraft DNL 01/01/08-01/31/08 01/01/09-01/31/09 01/01/10-01/31/10 1/1/2011-1/31/2011 30 60.1 58.9 58.5 56.4 31 45.6 43.5 43.1 43.1 32 42 40.6 38.7 38 33 47.1 43.1 42.4 42.8 34 40.7 40.1 36.9 39.5 35 51.1 52.1 48.6 47.7 36 50.7 50.6 49.2 47.8 37 47.1 46.3 44.5 40 38 50.1 46.6 46.3 43 39 50.3 45.9 47.8 45.2 Aircraft Noise Levels DNL dBA 1/1/2011- 1/31/2011 Top 15 Runway 17 Departure Destination Report Metropolitan Airports Commission Runway 17 Departure Analysis Report - 1/1/2011- 1/31/2011. Report Generated: 02/14/2011 10:06 - 6 - January 2011 Crossing -in- the - Corridor Analysis Minneapolis -St. Paul International Airport This report is for informational purposes only cannot be used for enforcement purposes January 2011 Crossing in the Corridor Analysis. Report Generated: 02/14/2011 10:06 Page 1 Metropolitan Airports Commission Carrier Jet Departure Operations Runways 12L & 12R (23:00 - 06:00) 120 Carrier Jets Departed Runways 12L & 12R between the hours of 23:00 and 06:00 Metropolitan Airports Commission January 2011 Carrier Jet Departure Operations Performing the Crossing Procedure off Runways 12L & 12R (23:00 - 06:00) 60 (50 %) Carrier Jets Crossed After Departing Runways 12L & 12R between the hours of 23:00 and 06:00 Page 2 Crossing in the Corridor Analysis. Report Generated: 02/14/2011 10:06 LC/ Metropolitan Airports Commission January 2011 Carrier Jet Departure Operations Runways 12L & 12R (06:00 - 23:00) 2404 Carrier Jets Departed Runways 12L & 12R between the hours of 06:00 and 23:00 Crossing in the Corridor Analysis. Report Generated: 02/14/2011 10:06 Page 3 Metropolitan Airports Commission January 2011 Carrier Jet Departure Operations Performing the Crossing Procedure off Runways 12L & 12R (06:00 - 23:00) 604 (25 %) Carrier Jets Crossed After Departing Runways 12L & 12R between the hours of 23:00 and 06:00 Page 4 Crossing in the Corridor Analysis. Report Generated: 02/14/2011 10:06 I tem_ efi p>tlon # of booths # of extra tables TOTAL AMOUNT DUE Organization Information Please list organization name and contact information, as you want it to be listed in the Showcase booklet. Organization Name Street Address City /State /Zip Main Contact Information Name (please print) Title Phone Email Exhibitor Sign — Official Organization Name Badge Names for Booth Personnel 1. 2. 3. 4 9 1/ ` City of Eagan Showcase Eagan Eagan Civic Arena Thursday, June 2, 2011 (4:30 p.m. — 7 :30 p.m.) Exhibitor Booth Reservations O $40.00 Includes a 10' x 10' booth that is piped and draped (8' back and 3' side rails), one chair, one 8' skirted table, and a small sign. ▪ $10.00 Extra table El No fee Electricity /power outlet Special Requests: Please complete the form, attach payment of your deposit and return before April 1, 2011. Make checks payable to the City of Eagan. Mail to: Credit Card (circle): Name (as it appears on card) Card number Expiration Date Signature Showcase Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55122 Visa MasterCard 4 City of Evan Please provide a brief description of your organization for the for the Showcase Eagan guide booklet. List your organization's official name (spelling out acronyms) and a contact phone number or address for residents interested in participation. Additional information may include the purpose of your organization, what it does, when it meets and how to participate (included restrictions or specific criteria for joining). Please return completed forms to City Hall before April 1, 2011. Mail to: Showcase Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55122 or sbrandel(a�citvofeagan.com Showcase Eagan Description of Organization tcs *See attached sample Big Brothers Big Sisters 56 Big Brothers Big Sisters of the Great Twin Cities strives to enrich the lives of young people through one -on -one mentorships. We serve 10 counties in the region and have programs in Eagan and surrounding communities. If you would like to make a difference in the life of a youth between the ages of 7 and 13, please call us at (651) 789 -2400 or on -line at www.bigstwincities.org. Cancer Society (Relay For Life) 62 The American Cancer Society is the nationwide community -based voluntary health organization dedicated to eliminating cancer as a major health problem by preventing cancer, saving lives, and diminishing suffering from cancer, through research, education, advocacy, and service. Eagan Relay For Life is the American Cancer Society's premiere community fundraising event. Relay represents the hope that those lost to cancer will never be forgotten, that those who face cancer will be supported, and that one day cancer will be eliminated. Please visit our website at www.relavforlife.org /eagammn or email at todd.peterson(a.cancer.org or pohne at (651) 255 -8159. Caponi Art Park and Learning Center 9 The Caponi Art Park and Leaning Center is a 60 -acrea community park dedicated to making art accessible to people of all ages and backgrounds. One of the most prominent cultural centers in Dakota County, the Art Park features a Sculpture Garden, the Theater in the Woods amphitheater, miles of wooded trails, park tours and cultural programs for the whole family. Programs include the Summer Performance Series, Family Fun Tuesdays, Shakespeare Festival, Medieval Fair and Poets in the Park. The Art Park and its programs are free and open to the public May through October, Tuesday — Sunday from 9:00 a.m. — dusk. Location: 1205 Diffley Road (between Pilot Knob and Lexington). For more information, please visit www.caponiartpark.orq or call (651) 454 -9412. Cheerful Givers 10 Cheerful Givers is a unique nonprofit organization that provides toy - filled birthday gift bags for less fortunate children. Volunteer groups (civic, corporate, school, faith -based and families) are needed who can provide and assemble birthday gift bags at your location. Individual opportunities are also available. For more information, visit www.cheerfulqivers.org or contact KarenCa.cheerfu lgivers. orq. SAMPLE (2009 Showcase Eagan booklet) The Dakota Communications Center (DCC) 4 The Dakota Communications Center (DCC) provides 9- 1-1 and public safety dispatch services for all citizens and public safety agencies in Dakota County. When the DCC opened in 2007, it carried out the duties previously performed by five 9 -1 -1 centers. In 2008, DCC dispatchers handled over 376,000 police, fire and medical incidents. For more information, please visit our website at www.mn - dcc.orq or call (651) 322 -8660. Dakota County Community Development Agency 73 The Dakota County Community Development Agency (CDA) was established in 1971 and has grown into one of the largest local providers of housing and community development programs in Minnesota. In Eagan, the CDA owns and manages 245 units of affordable senior housing and 76 units of workforce housing for families. The CDA's Homeownership Connection services provide programs and resources to help homebuyers and homeowners be successful. For more information, please visit www.dakotacda.org or call (651) 675 -4400. Dakota County Elks Lodge #2832 The Elks Lodge is a fraternal organization with membership available to U.S. citizens 21 years of age and older. The organization was established in the late 1800's and is committed to supporting veterans, children and the community. If you enjoy giving back to the community and having a great time, please consider joining the Lodge. The group meets twice a month at the VFW in Rosemount. For more information, please email ftrempscomcast.net. Dakota County Library 7 The Dakota County Library serves its residents through nine library locations, a bookmobile and home delivery service. The Dakota County Library's Mission is to support lifelong learning for county residents of all ages by anticipating and responding to their needs for information, encouraging their desire to read and enriching the quality of life in their communities. For information, please visit www.dakotacounty.us /library or call the Wescott Library at (651) 450 -2900. 41 City of Evan 1. All booth rentals are final. Exhibitors must restrict their displays to the space reserved. Exhibitors may not use the aisles in any way. 2. Exhibitors must set up and tear down in the allocated times. Set up: Vendor arrival: Take down: Showcase Eagan Rules & Regulations Wednesday, June 1 Thursday, June 2 Thursday, June 2 4:00 p.m. 4:00 p.m. to 9:00 p.m. 9:00 a.m. to 12:00 p.m. Thursday, June 2 7:30 p.m. to 10:00 p.m. (no take down shall occur before 7:30) 3. All displays and exhibits must comply with all the rules and regulations of the Eagan Fire Department. Fire exits and alleys must remain open at all times. All decorations shall be made of fireproof material or fireproofed. 4. Neither the City of Eagan, nor their employees are responsible for any loss or damage that may arise to the exhibitor, volunteers, or their goods, either while in transit to or from the building or while in the building, from any cause whatsoever. 5. All space rental charges must be paid prior to April 1, 2011. 6. Electricity use must be requested before May 1, 2011. 7. If you have questions during the show, please contact a City of Eagan employee. 8. Please park in assigned parking area to make room for visitors in front of the Civic Arena. 9. Drop off and pick up for vendors should be done in designated drop off /pick up areas. 10. All booths include an 8' skirted table, backdrop, chair and sign of your organization. 11. Beverages must have a lid on at all times. If you have any questions, please contact Sarah Brandel at (651) 675 -5671 or sbrandel I P` City of Eagan Tips for a successful Showcase Eagan The chance to make a positive impression and convince people to engage in your booth passes quickly. The following suggestions will help introduce visitors to your organization. 1. Design the booth so visitors can navigate easily without feeling crowded. a. Keep the atmosphere intimate and remove any barriers between yourself and your audience. b. Stand near the aisle or off to the side so you do not block any views of your booth. c. Keep all of your organization items within your designated booth area. 2. Keep messages simple, but give details. 3. Communicate who you are and what your organization does. a. Focus on your target audience and design your booth to appeal to them. Make it clear what service you are offering. 4. Use signs and graphics to focus visitor attention on your message. a. Print text large enough to be read from a distance. b. Place text in the upper half of your display design, so people standing in front of the booth will not block it. c. Limit your main colors to 3 or less. 5. Consider offering a giveaway that conveys your message in a way that ties in with the exhibit's theme. 6. Greet visitors a. Smile. © b. Say hello. c. Do not sit. d. Keep hands in front of you. e. Do not talk on your cell phone. Thank you for your participation! (AR MEMORANDUM TO: MSP Noise Oversight Committee (NOC) FROM: Chad E. Legve, Manager — Aviation Noise and Satellite Programs SUBJECT: FINALIZATION OF PERFORMANCE BASED NAVIGATION (PBN) PROCEDURE DESIGN NOISE CRITERIA FOR PROCEDURE DEVELOPMENT /IMPLEMENTATION AT MSP DATE: February 25, 2011 At the last Noise Oversight Committee (NOC) meeting on January 19, 2011 discussion began on the development of Performance Based Navigation (PBN) procedure design noise criteria for procedure development and implementation at Minneapolis -St. Paul International Airport (MSP). As was detailed at the January 19 NOC meeting, on November 30, 2010 the Minneapolis -St. Paul International Airport (MSP) Performance Based Navigation (PBN) integration effort began with a three -day kickoff meeting. At the kickoff meeting staff emphasized the importance of making noise considerations part of the PBN procedure development effort. Staff informed the group that the NOC would be providing general criteria that should be considered in the PBN development effort at MSP. Below is the draft list of procedure design noise criteria that was reviewed at the January 19 NOC meeting. Specifically, it was discussed that the NOC's criteria could state that this process should: ■ Provide a noise contour analysis using the MSP 2010 actual noise contour data and analyzing the effects of the procedures on the noise contours at MSP. • Provide a public information program to inform the public. ■ Reduce the number of sensitive land use overflights. (This could be done through increased Eagan- Mendota Heights Departure Corridor compliance, maximizing the concentration of westbound Runway 17 departures directly over the Minnesota River Valley, noise - sensitive departure tracks for operations east of runway heading off Runway 17, and focusing operations to the northwest over major road corridors, where possible.) • Reduce aircraft arrival noise. • Maximize use of RNAV noise tracks as part of the Runway Use System. (An example would be, during southeast operational flows, focusing easterly bound departure operations on Runways 12L and 12R on Corridor Compliant RNAV tracks, while focusing south and west bound departures on Runway 17 on the River RNAV track). (0 ITEM 4 At the March 16, 2011 NOC meeting Committee members should come prepared to offer any additional ideas and approve final criteria to be forwarded to the FAA for consideration in the procedure development/implementation process. COMMITTEE ACTION Approve a list of RNAV /RNP procedure design noise criteria to be communicated in writing by the NOC Co- Chairs to the FAA. EAGAN AIRPORT RELATIONS COMMISSION 2011 MEETING SCHEDULE January 11, 2011 March 8, 2011 May 10, 2011 July 12, 2011 September 13, 2011 November 8, 2011 Metropolitan Airports Commission Annual Noise Contour Analysis /7 Table of Contents List of Tables ii List of Figures iii Chapter 1: Background 1 1.1 Corrective Land Use Efforts at MSP to Address Airport Noise 1 1.2 2007 Forecast Mitigated Noise Contour 3 1.3 Airport Noise Litigation 4 1.4 Noise Mitigation Settlement and Annual Noise Contour Analysis 5 Chapter 2: 2010 Actual Noise Contour 7 2.1 2010 Actual Noise Contour Development. 7 2.1.1 Integrated Noise Model 7 2.1.2 2010 Aircraft Operations and Fleet Mix 7 2.1.3 2010 Runway Use 12 2.1.4 2010 Flight Tracks 13 2.1.5 2010 Atmospheric Conditions 13 2.2 2010 Modeled Versus Measured DNL Levels 14 2.3 2010 Noise Contour Impacts 15 Chapter 3: Comparison of the 2010 Actual Noise Contour and the 2007 Forecast Noise Contour 16 3.1 Comparison of 2010 Actual and 2007 Forecast Noise Contour Inputs 16 3.1.1 Integrated Noise Model Considerations 16 3.1.2 Aircraft Operations and Fleet Mix Comparison 16 3.1.3 Runway Use Comparison 21 3.1.4 Flight Track Considerations 22 3.1.5 Atmospheric Conditions Comparison 23 3.2 Comparative Integrated Noise Model Grid Point Analysis 23 3.3 Contour Comparison Summary 24 1 List of Tables Table 1.1: Summary of 2007 Forecast Mitigated DNL Noise Contour Single and Multi - Family Unit Counts 4 Table 2.1: Minneapolis -St. Paul International Airport 2010 Total Operations Number 8 Table 2.2: Minneapolis -St. Paul International Airport 2010 Aircraft Fleet Mix and Average Daily Operations 9 Table 2.3: Minneapolis -St. Paul International Airport 2010 Runway Use 13 Table 2.4: Minneapolis -St. Paul International Airport 2010 Measured Versus Modeled INM DNL Values at ANOMS RMT Locations 14 Table 2.5: Summary of 2010 Actual DNL Noise Contour Single and Multi - Family Unit Counts 15 Table 3.1: Minneapolis -St. Paul International Airport 2007 Forecast Mitigated vs. 2010 Actual Annual Total Operations Summary 16 Table 3.2: Minneapolis -St. Paul International Airport Comparision of 2007 Mitigated Forecast Fleet Mix and 2010 Actual Fleet Mix 18 Table 3.3: Minneapolis -St. Paul International Airport 2010 Actual and 2007 Mitigated Forecast Runway Use Comparision 22 11 List of Figures Figure 1.1: 2007 Forecast Mitigated Contours Following Page 4 Figure 2.1: 2010 INM Tracks — Runway 30L Departures Overall Use Percentage Figure 2.2: 2010 INM Tracks — Runway 30R Departures Overall Use Percentage Figure 2.3: 2010 INM Tracks — Runway 04 Departures Overall Use Percentage Figure 2.4: 2010 INM Tracks — Runway 12L Departures Overall Use Percentage Figure 2.5: 2010 INM Tracks — Runway 12R Departures Overall Use Percentage Figure 2.6: 2010 INM Tracks — Runway 22 Departures Overall Use Percentage Figure 2.7: 2010 INM Tracks — Runway 17 Departures Overall Use Percentage Figure 2.8: 2010 INM Tracks — Runway 35 Departures Overall Use Percentage Figure 2.9: 2010 INM Tracks — Runway 12R Arrivals Overall Use Percentage Figure 2.10: 2010 INM Tracks — Runway 12L Arrivals Overall Use Percentage Following Page 13 Figure 2.11: 2010 INM Tracks — Runway 22 Arrivals Overall Use Percentage Following Page 13 Figure 2.12: 2010 INM Tracks — Runway 30R Arrivals Overall Use Percentage Following Page 13 Figure 2.13: 2010 INM Tracks — Runway 30L Arrivals Overall Use Percentage Following Page 13 Figure 2.14: 2010 INM Tracks — Runway 04 Arrivals Overall Use Percentage Following Page 13 Figure 2.15: 2010 INM Tracks — Runway 35 Arrivals Overall Use Percentage Following Page 13 Figure 2.16: 2010 INM Tracks — Runway 17 Arrivals Overall Use Percentage Following Page 13 Figure 2.17: 2010 Actual Contours Following Page 15 Figure 2.18: 2007, 2008, 2009, and 2010 Actual Noise Contours Following Page 15 Figure 3.1: Decibel Levels from 2010 Actual Grid Point DNLs Following Page 23 Figure 3.2: Decibel Levels from 2010 Actual Grid Point DNLs City of Minneapolis Following Page 23 Figure 3.3: Decibel Levels from 2010 Actual Grid Point DNLs City of Richfield Following Page 23 Figure 3.4: Decibel Levels from 2010 Actual Grid Point DNLs West Eagan, Bloomington Following Page 23 Figure 3.5: Decibel Levels from 2010 Actual Grid Point DNLs East Eagan, Inver Grove Heights, Mendota Heights Following Page 23 111 Following Page 13 Following Page 13 Following Page 13 Following Page 13 Following Page 13 Following Page 13 Following Page 13 Following Page 13 Following Page 13 Figure 3.6: Decibel Levels from 2007 Forecast Mitigated Grid Point DNLs Following Page 23 Figure 3.7: Decibel Levels from 2007 Forecast Mitigated Grid Point DNLs City of Minneapolis Following Page 23 Figure 3.9: Decibel Levels from 2007 Forecast Mitigated Grid Point DNLs City of Richfield Following Page 23 Figure 3.9: Decibel Levels from 2007 Forecast Mitigated Grid Point DNLs West Eagan, Bloomington Following Page 23 Figure 3.10: Decibel Levels from 2007 Forecast Mitigated Grid Point DNLs East Eagan, Inver Grove Heights, Mendota Heights Following Page 23 Figure 3.11: Difference in dB Level Between 2007 Forecast Mitigated and 2010 Actual Grid Point DNLs for Blocks Included in Noise Mitigation Settlement Following Page 24 Figure 3.12: Difference in dB Level Between 2007 Forecast Mitigated and 2010 Actual Grid Point DNLs for Blocks Included in Noise Mitigation Settlement City of Minneapolis Following Page 24 Figure 3.13: Difference in dB Level Between 2007 Forecast Mitigated and 2010 Actual Grid Point DNLs for Blocks Included in Noise Mitigation Settlement City of Richfield Following Page 24 Figure 3.14: Difference in dB Level Between 2007 Forecast Mitigated and 2010 Actual Grid Point DNLs for Blocks Included in Noise Mitigation Settlement West Eagan and Bloomington Following Page 24 Figure 3.15: Difference in dB Level Between 2007 Forecast Mitigated and 2010 Actual Grid Point DNLs for Blocks Included in Noise Mitigation Settlement East Eagan, Inver Grove Heights, Mendota Heights Following Page 24 Figure 3.16: 2007 Forecast Mitigated Contours and 2010 Actual Contours Following Page 24 IN Chapter 1 Background The issue of noise at Minneapolis -St. Paul Intemational Airport (MSP) includes a long history of local efforts to quantify and mitigate noise impacts in a manner responsive to concerns raised by the communities around the airport and consistent with federal policy. These efforts have resulted in the conceptualization and implementation of many initiatives to reduce noise impacts around MSP. One of the most notable of these initiatives has been the sound insulation program implemented under 14 Code of Federal Regulations (C.F.R.) Part 150. Part 150 provides a framework for airport operators to develop a comprehensive noise plan for an airport in the form of a Noise Compatibility Program (NCP). A Part 150 NCP is comprised of two fundamental approaches to addressing noise impacts around an airport: (1) Land Use Measures, and (2) Noise Abatement Measures (operational measures to reduce noise). A key component of Part 150 program planning is the development of a base case Noise Exposure Map (NEM) and a five -year forecast NEM without (unmitigated forecast scenario) and with (forecast mitigated scenario) the recommended operational noise abatement measures. Including operational noise abatement measures is important, because the manner in which an airport is operated and how aircraft procedures are executed have a direct effect on an airport's noise impact. NEMs are commonly referred to as noise contours. Forecast mitigated noise contours depict the areas that may be eligible for Land Use Measures (compatible land use plans, property acquisition, residential relocation, and sound mitigation) around an airport. Recognizing the need for increased infrastructure and the emerging importance of noise issues as operations at MSP increased, the Metropolitan Airports Commission (MAC) submitted its first MSP Part 150 Study to the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) in October 1987. NEMs were accepted by the FAA in October 1989, and portions of the NCP were approved in April 1990. The NCP included Corrective Land Use Measures which called for the soundproofing of residences, schools and other public buildings. A 1992 update to the NCP and NEM marked the beginning of corrective mitigation measures in the forecast 1996 NEM 65 and greater Day -Night Average Sound Level (DNL) noise contours. 1.1 Corrective Land Use Efforts at MSP to Address Airport Noise Since 1992, the residential noise mitigation program has been a large and visible part of the Part 150 program at MSP. The MAC designed the MSP residential noise mitigation program using FAA structural Noise Level Reduction (NLR) documentation to establish product - specific Sound Transmission Class (STC) ratings and associated NLR goals, creative bidding practices, and cooperative prioritization and funding efforts. Through innovative approaches to continually enhancing the program as new information and technologies became available, the MSP residential noise mitigation program quickly became a national model. Because testing and evaluation of single - family homes near MSP indicated that the majority of such homes provided an average 30 dB of outside - to-inside sound attenuation, the MAC developed a so- called "5 dB package" for single - family homes within the 65 DNL and greater noise contours. This package provided an average exterior- to-interior noise reduction level of 5 dB, ensuring a noticeable level of reduction designed to meet the FAA's target of a 45 DNL interior L,7 1 noise level in each home.' The 5 dB package offered a menu of mitigation measures that the MAC might install to achieve an average of a 5 dB noise reduction and meet the 45 DNL interior noise level in an individual home. The menu of mitigation measures included: windows; prime doors; attic insulation; baffling of attic vents, mail slots and chimneys; and the addition of central air - conditioning. The MAC determined which specific mitigation measures were necessary for a particular home after assessing the home's existing condition. As a result of detailed and extensive project management and quality control, the program achieved an excellent record of homeowner satisfaction. Since 1997, when homeowners were asked if the improvements were effective at reducing aircraft noise, an average 97 percent responded yes. When asked if the modifications improved interior home comfort, an average of 95 percent responded yes. In 2003, when homeowners were asked if they were satisfied with the overall program product quality, 100 percent answered yes. In 2004, the MAC awarded the final bids for the remaining unmitigated homes in the 1996 65 DNL noise contour. In early 2006, the MAC completed the mitigation of an additional 165 single - family homes in the 2007 forecast mitigated 65 DNL noise contour. A significant milestone at MSP, this also represented a significant accomplishment for an industry- leading airport noise mitigation program. The program resulted in the mitigation of over 7,800 single - family homes in communities around MSP. The financial investment in the MSP Residential Sound Insulation Program was among the largest in the nation for such programs. Throughout the 14 -year project (1992 -2006) several variables had an impact on the project's annual financial profile. Year- to-year variations in housing stock and material costs caused fluctuations in the unit, or house - per - house, costs. This, combined with variations in annual budgets as a result of challenges such as the terrorist attacks of 9/11, resulted in a fluctuating rate of annual home completions. Annual average mitigation costs per single - family home ranged from a low of $17,300 in 1994 to a high of $45,000 in 2001. The MAC spent a total of approximately $229.5 million on the single - family home mitigation program during its 14 -year lifespan. In addition to the single - family mitigation program, the MAC also mitigated multi- family units and schools, and engaged in property acquisition and relocation. The multi - family component of the residential noise mitigation program started in 2001, and was significantly smaller in both the number of structures mitigated and the associated costs. With completion of multi - family structures in the 1996 65 DNL noise contour, the MAC mitigated approximately 1,327 multi - family units at a total cost of approximately $11.1 million. Also, since 1981, the MAC has mitigated 18 schools located around MSP. This total represents all of the schools located within the 65 DNL noise contour. In response to the legislature's directives, the MAC also provided mitigation to certain schools located outside the 1996 65 DNL noise contour. The costs of insulating individual schools varied from $850,000 to $8 million. A total of approximately $52 million was spent on the school sound insulation program. In addition to the residential and school noise mitigation programs, the MAC also implemented a residential property acquisition program that facilitated the relocation of sensitive land uses, such as residential buildings, in noise impact areas. The intent of the residential acquisition program was to address impacted properties in the 1996 65 DNL noise contour where the property owners and the city in which the respective property resided agreed that acquisition was the desirable means of 1 FAA, "Guidelines for the Sound Insulation of Residences Exposed to Aircraft Operations," October 1992, pg. 3 2 mitigating the homes. As a result, the MAC acquired approximately 437 residential properties. In total, the MAC expended approximately $93.0 million on the residential property acquisition program. 1.2 2007 Forecast Mitigated Noise Contour In late 1998, the MAC authorized an update to the Part 150 program at MSP. The update process began in 1999 with the development of noise contours and noise abatement and land use measures. The MAC published a draft Part 150 Update document in October 2000 and submitted the study, including a 2005 forecast NEM and revised NCP, to the FAA for review. In May 2002, after further consideration of the events of 9/11, the MAC withdrew the study to update the forecast and associated noise contours. The forecast update process began in February 2003. This effort focused on updating the base case year from a 2000 scenario to a 2002 base case, and updating the forecast year from 2005 to 2007. The purpose of the forecast update was to ensure that the noise contours considered the events of 9/11 and ongoing changes in the MSP aircraft fleet. In addition to updating the forecast, the MAC and the MSP Noise Oversight Committee (NOC) conducted a review of the Integrated Noise Model (INM) input methodology and data to ensure continued consensus with the previous contour (i.e., November 2001) development process. On November 17, 2003, the MAC approved the revised forecast and fleet mix numbers and INM input methodology and data for use in developing the 2002 and 2007 NEMs. In March 2004, the MAC revised the forecast to incorporate certain corrections in general aviation numbers and to reflect Northwest Airline's announcement that it would resume service of five RJ85 aircraft that had previously been taken out of service. The 2004 Part 150 Update resulted in a comprehensive Noise Compatibility Program (NCP) recommendation. In addition to several land use measures around MSP, the NCP included provisions for a number of operational Noise Abatement (NA) Measures. The aircraft and airport operational noise abatement initiatives in the 2004 Part 150 Update focused on aircraft operation procedures, runway use, departure and arrival flight tracks, voluntary operational agreements with the airlines, and provisions for further evaluation of technology. As a result of the extensive analyses and review included in the 2004 MSP Part 150 Update, the Part 150 Update's NCP included 17 NA Measures. The MAC has implemented 12 of the 17 NA Measures. Of the remaining five measures, two are modifications of existing NCP measures that the MAC recommended as part of the 1993 Part 150 Update and three are new measures. The MAC has implemented the operational noise NA Measures outlined in the November 2004 Part 150 Update NCP that are reflected in the 2007 forecast mitigated noise contour included in the 2004 MSP Part 150 Update. Given that the MAC has implemented the operational NA measures that result in the shape and size of the 2007 forecast mitigated noise contour, consistent with the Dual -Track Airport Planning Process Final Environmental Impact Statement, and that the 2007 forecast mitigated assumptions are conservative when compared with existing operations and fleet mix figures, the 2007 forecast contours are a reasonable estimate of future noise impacts at MSP. Moreover, recent operations forecast in the MSP Long -Term Comprehensive Plan (LTCP) Update indicate that the 2007 forecasted level of operations will not occur until after 2019. Z q 3 City IDIOCK Intersect Count Implemenmuon me[noa. ,..omplefeo Renec[ Nn units ,..Omp,ereu rnor Io crirNll1 Dwelling Units Within DNL (dB) Interval Single Family Multi-Family 60-64 66-69 70-74 75+ Total 60-64 66-69 70-74 76+ Total Minneapolis Completed Additional 5067 2364 3078 504 - - - - 8649 2364 167 1228 27 - 466 - - - 66D 1228 Total 7431 3078 504 - 11013 1395 27 466 - 1888 Bloomington Completed Additional 130 18 109 40 - - - - 279 18 - 388 447 - 618 - - - 1065 388 Total 148 109 40 - 297 388 447 618 - 1453 Richfield Completed Additional 761 373 296 - - - - - 1057 373 18 491 14 - - - - - 32 491 Total 1134 296 - - 1430 509 14 - - 523 Eagan Completed Additional 505 145 22 - - - - - 527 145 - 38 - - - - - - - 38 Total 650 22 - - 672 38 - - - 38 Mendota Heights Completed Additional 93 - 4 - - - - - 97 - - - - - - - - - - - Total 93 4 - - 97 - - - - - AIl Cities Completed Additional 6556 2900 3509 544 - - - - 10609 2900 185 2145 488 - 1084 - - - 1757 2145 Total 9456 3509 544 - 13509 2330 488 1084 - 3902 Based on the estimate of 582,366 total operations in the 2007 forecast mitigated scenario, approximately 7,234.4 acres are in the 65 DNL noise contour and approximately 15,708.3 acres are in the 60 DNL noise contour. Table 1.1 contains the count of single - family (one to three units per structure) and multi - family (more than three units per structure) dwelling units within the 2007 forecast mitigated noise contours. The counts are based on the block intersect methodology, where all structures on a block that is within or touched by the noise contour are counted. Table 1.1 MiNNEAPOLISST.PAUL INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT Summary of 2007 Forecast Mitigated DNL Noise Contour Single and Multi- Family Unit Counts As a result of new updated parcel information that the MAC obtained from MetroGlS on October 31, 2007, the unit counts in Table 1.1 differ from previous figures published for the 2007 forecast mitigated noise contours in the November 2004 Part 150 Update Document. A depiction of the 2007 forecast mitigated noise contours is provided in Figure 1.1. 1.3 Airport Noise Litigation One of the largest discussion items in the Part 150 Update process that began in 1999 focused on the mitigation program that the MAC would offer in the 64 to 60 DNL noise contour area. The FAA recognizes sensitive land uses, such as residential land uses, within the 65 and greater DNL noise contours that are impacted by aircraft noise as eligible for noise mitigation under Part 150. However, as part of the Dual -Track Airport Planning Process the MAC made a policy decision to provide some level of noise mitigation out to the 60 DNL noise contour at MSP. During the Dual - Track Airport Planning Process, the MSP Noise Mitigation Committee was tasked with developing a noise mitigation plan to be considered in conjunction with the expansion of MSP at its present location. Throughout the entire Part 150 Update process, the intent of the MSP Noise Mitigation Committee's recommendation regarding mitigation outside the 65 DNL contour was a topic of detailed discussion and debate. During the course of the Part 150 Update process the MAC formulated a number of mitigation proposals, culminating in a final MAC position on mitigation outside the 65 DNL contour. In the November 2004 Part 150 Update, the MAC's recommendation for mitigation in the 64 to 60 DNL contours called for providing central air - conditioning to single - family homes that did not have it, with a homeowner co -pay based on the degree of noise impact. The MAC based eligibility for the mitigation proposal on the 2007 forecast mitigated noise contour using the block intersect methodology. The cities located around MSP expressed dissatisfaction 4 with the MAC proposal, asserting that the MSP Noise Mitigation Committee recommended that the 5 dB package was to be expanded to all properties in the 64 to 60 DNL noise contours. The MAC countered that the MSP Noise Mitigation Committee recommendations did not specify the mitigation package elements to be offered in the 64 to 60 DNL noise contour area and that, because homes in Minnesota have higher than the national average pre - existing noise attenuation characteristics, the full 5 dB package was not necessary outside the 65 DNL contour. In early 2005, the Cities of Minneapolis, Eagan, and Richfield filed suit in Hennepin County District Court claiming the MAC violated the Minnesota Environmental Rights Act (MERA) by failing to provide a 5 dB package to single - family homes in the 64 to 60 DNL contours. In September 2005, plaintiffs seeking class action certification filed a separate action against the MAC alleging breach of contract claims associated with mitigation in the 64 to 60 DNL contours. In January 2007, Hennepin County District Judge Stephen Aldrich granted the cities partial summary judgment on Count II of the cities' complaint. The court found that the MAC, by virtue of implementing the 5 dB package, created an environmental standard that the MAC violated by recommending different mitigation in the 64 to 60 DNL noise contour area. In February 2007, the court held a trial on the cities' claims. Before the court entered final judgment post -trial, however, the parties negotiated a global settlement resolving the cities' case and the class action suit. 1.4 Noise Mitigation Settlement and Annual Noise Contour Analysis On October 19, 2007, Judge Stephen Aldrich approved a Consent Decree entered into by the MAC and the cities of Minneapolis, Eagan, and Richfield that settled the cities' litigation. The Consent Decree provided that it became effective only it (1) the FAA advised the MAC in writing by November 15, 2007 that the Decree was an appropriate use of airport revenue and was consistent with the MAC's federal grant obligations; and (2) that the court approved a settlement in the class action case by January 17, 2008. Both of these conditions were satisfied, and the MAC is implementing single - family and multi - family mitigation out to the 2007 60 DNL and 2005 60 DNL noise contours as the Consent Decree requires. Under the Decree, mitigation activities will vary based on noise contour. Homes in the most noise - impacted contours are eligible for more extensive mitigation than those in Tess impacted areas. The Decree provides that approximately 433 homes in the 2007 64 to 63 DNL noise contours are eligible to receive the same level of noise mitigation that the MAC provided in the 1996 65 DNL and greater contours. The 2007 64 to 63 DNL noise contour mitigation program is designed to achieve five decibels of noise reduction on average, with mitigation measures that may include the following, depending upon the home's existing condition: central air - conditioning; exterior and storm window repair or replacement; prime door and storm door repair or replacement; wall and attic insulation; baffling of roof vents and chimney treatment. The Decree requires that the MAC complete construction of mitigation in the 2007 64 and 63 DNL noise contours by December 31, 2009. This task was completed. In addition, under the Decree, owners of the approximately 5,394 single - family homes in the 2007 62 to 60 DNL noise contours will be eligible for one of two mitigation packages: 1) an estimated 2,852 homes that did not have central air - conditioning as of September 1, 2007 will receive it and up to $4,000 (including installation costs) in other noise mitigation products and services they could choose from a menu provided by the MAC; or 2) owners of homes that already had central air - conditioning installed as of September 1, 2007 or who choose not to receive central air - conditioning will be eligible for up to $14,000 (including installation costs) in noise mitigation products and services they could choose from a menu provided by the MAC. The mitigation menu 5 includes upgrades such as: exterior and storm window repair or replacement; prime door and storm door repair or replacement; wall and attic insulation; and baffling of roof vents and chimney treatment. The Decree requires that the MAC complete construction of mitigation in the 2007 62 to 60 DNL contours by December 1, 2012. Single - family homes in the 2007 64 and 63 DNL contours and in the 2007 62 to 60 DNL contours whose earlier owners opted out of the previously completed MAC noise mitigation program for the 1996 65 and greater DNL contours but that had new owners on September 1, 2007 are eligible to "opt in" and receive noise mitigation. If the total cost to the MAC of the opt -in mitigation is less than $7 million, any remaining funds will be used to reimburse owners of single - family homes between the 2005 mitigated 60 DNL contour and the 2007 forecast mitigated 60 DNL contour for purchase and installation of products included on a menu provided by the MAC. The amount each homeowner receives will be determined by subtracting dollars spent for the opt -in program from the total $7 million budget, and then dividing the remainder among the total number of single - family homes within the 2005 60 DNL and 2007 60 DNL contours. The MAC has begun to issue reimbursements and will complete them by July 31, 2014. The total cost of the "opt -in" mitigation and the 2005 mitigated 60 DNL contour reimbursement mitigation program is capped at $7 million. The MAC began implementing the Noise Mitigation Program in October 2007 following the terms and conditions of the Consent Decree that settled the noise mitigation lawsuit. As of February of 2011, the MAC has completed noise mitigation for all of the single - family homes in the 2007 63-64 DNL contours. (400 homes participated in the program.) In addition, the MAC has completed 2,698 homes in the 2007 60 -62 DNL and has another 922 homes in the design and construction phases at present. A total of 650 homes have been provided reimbursements for approved noise mitigation enhancements in the 2007 60 DNL to 2005 60 DNL contour area. With regard to the multi - family noise mitigation program, the MAC has installed acoustical covers on the air conditioners in 1,724 living units and will complete the installation of new air - conditioning units in 255 living units in 2010. The total cost to implement mitigation under the Consent Decree is uncertain until the program is complete, but it could cost as much as $130 million. In addition to the MAC's mitigation obligations, the Consent Decree releases legal claims that the cities and homeowners have against the MAC in exchange for the actions that the MAC will perform under the Decree. (Consent Decree Section 8.1, p. 38.) The releases cease to be effective for a certain location if the average annual aircraft noise level in DNL at that location is at or above DNL 60 and is at least two decibels in DNL higher than the DNL level for that location in the 2007 mitigated noise contours. The MAC determines future DNL values by using the FAA's Integrated Noise Model and actual MSP operations data to generate a noise contour reflecting noise conditions at MSP for the prior calendar year. (Consent Decree Section 8.1(d), pp. 38 -39.) The MAC must develop a noise contour reflecting noise conditions for the prior calendar year by March 1 of each year. The MAC has prepared this report to satisfy Section 8.1(d) of the Consent Decree. The actual contour that the MAC must develop under Section 8.1(d) of the Consent Decree is relevant only to the release provisions in Section 8.1. The Consent Decree requires the MAC to use only the 2007 forecast mitigated DNL contours and the 2005 forecast DNL mitigated contours for mitigation purposes. MAC staff and representatives from the cities of Minneapolis, Eagan, and Richfield met on February 11 and 20, 2008 to discuss and finalize the annual report format. 6 �3 Chapter 2 2010 act Noise Contour As discussed previously, Section 8.1(d) of the Consent Decree requires the MAC by March 1 of each year to prepare an actual noise contour reflecting the noise conditions around MSP for the prior calendar year. This chapter provides detailed information regarding the 2010 actual noise contour at MSP. 2.1 2010 Actual Noise Contour Development 2.1.1 Integrated Noise Model The FAA - established mechanism for quantifying airport DNL noise impacts is the Integrated Noise Model (INM). The availability of federal or airport- generated funds for the purpose of noise mitigation efforts such as sound insulation is contingent upon the development of a Noise Exposure Map (DNL noise contours) in a manner that is consistent with the federal criteria (i.e., INM and DNL). The INM is used to assess the noise impact of aircraft operations. The INM uses input files consisting of information relative to runway use, flight track use, aircraft fleet mix, aircraft performance and thrust settings, topography information, and atmospheric conditions to generate a Noise Exposure Map. The computer model generates contours, typically represented in five DNL increments, that depict an annualized average day of aircraft noise impacts. The DNL contours generated are the focal point of any noise mitigation measure proposed in a Part 150 program. Quantifying aircraft- specific noise characteristics in INM is accomplished through the use of a comprehensive noise database that has been developed under the auspices of Federal Aviation Regulation (FAR) Part 36. As part of the airworthiness certification process, aircraft manufacturers are required to subject aircraft to a battery of noise tests. Through the use of federally adopted and endorsed algorithms, this aircraft- specific noise information is used in the generation of INM DNL contours. Justification for such an approach is rooted in national standardization of noise quantification at airports. The FAA Office of Environment and Energy (AEE -100) developed the INM. Since 1978, the INM has been the FM's standard tool for determining the predicted noise impact in the vicinity of airports. The INM is designed to estimate Tong -term average effects using average annual input conditions. The MAC used INM Version 7.0b, which is the latest version of the model, to develop the 2010 actual noise contour. 2.1.2 2010 Aircraft Operations and Fleet Mix The past 10 years have presented many challenges to the aviation industry. From a local perspective, operational levels and the aircraft fleet mix at MSP have been subject to lingering effects from the events of 9/11, high fuel prices, a flurry of bankruptcy filings by several legacy airlines including Northwest Airlines, an economic recession and overall market forces that appear to be favoring consolidation, as indicated by Delta Air Lines' acquisition of Northwest Airlines in 2008. These developments have had profound effects on airline and airport operations. For example, the actual 2010 operational level at MSP is below the operational level documented at the airport over 15 years ago. 7 8� Operations Category Number of Operations* Scheduled Passenger Air Carrier (a) 394,407 Cargo 12, 049 Charter 103 GA 26,185 Military 2,839 TOTAL 435,583 The MAC derived total MSP operations numbers for this study from MAC Noise and Operations Monitoring System (MACNOMS) data. The MACNOMS total operations number was 0.8 percent lower than the FAA Air Traffic Activity Data System (ATADS) number. To rectify the numbers, the MAC adjusted the MACNOMS data upward to equal the total 2010 FAA ATADS number. Table 2.1 provides the total number of 2010 aircraft operations at MSP by operational category. The 2010 total operations number of 435,583 is up slightly from the 2009 number of 432,604 (0.6 percent increase). In addition to the reduction in overall operations at MSP, the aircraft fleet mix at MSP is continuing to change. Considering the multi-faceted nature of the variables that are presently impacting the operational downturn at MSP, it is difficult to Table 2.1 MINNEAPOLIS -ST. PAUL INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT 2010 Total Operations Numbers Notes: (a) Includes both air carrier and regional carrier operations * Based on actual year -to -date 2010 MACNOMS data adjusted to match FAA ATADS data (to account for unavailable MACNOMS operations data). forecast long -term operational implications. All signs, however, seem to point to a fundamental change in the nature of airline operations at MSP, especially in the type of aircraft flown by all airlines and in particular by Delta Air Lines. Specifically, operations by older aircraft such as the DC9 and B727 that have been " hushkitted" to meet the Stage 3 noise standard are decreasing. Following the events of 9/11, the number of monthly Stage 3 hushkit operations dropped off significantly at MSP and has never retumed to pre -9/11 levels. The number of monthly Stage 3 hushkit operations dropped to 9,450 in September 2001 and have continued to drop. Stage 3 hushkit operations dropped to a low of 837 total monthly operations in December 2010. At the same time that older hushkit aircraft operations are declining, the use of newer and quieter manufactured Stage 3 aircraft is on the rise. The best examples at MSP of the increasing use of newer aircraft are the Airbus A320/319, Airbus 330, Regional Jets (CARJ -200 and EMB -170), Boeing B757- 200/300, and Boeing B737- 700/800. These aircraft are replacing older hushkitted Stage 3 aircraft such as the DC10, DC9, and B727. When comparing the DC9 hushkitted aircraft to the CRJ -200 regional jet, 43 CRJ operations would be required to generate the same noise impact as one DC9 operation. The CRJ -200 aircraft represents newer technology engine noise emission levels. Table 2.2 provides a breakdown of the 2010 aircraft fleet mix at MSP. The average daily number of hushkitted aircraft operations was down in 2010 to 64.6 from 92.8 in 2009. In 2010, the average daily number of total nighttime operations was 93.4, down from the 108.1 average daily nighttime operations in 2009. Overall, the 2010 total average daily operations number of 1,190.9 is up slightly by 0.5 percent from the 1,184.7 average daily operations in 2009. 8 Manufactured/ Re- engined Stage 3 Jet A300 -622R A300B4 -203 A310 -304 A318 A319 -131 A320 -211 A321 -232 A330 A340 ASTR 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 92.2 92.8 2.1 5.2 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 6.5 11.7 0.9 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 98.7 104.5 3.0 5.6 0.0 0.0 B717 -200 8.4 1.5 9.9 B737 -300 12.5 0.9 13.4 B737 -400 0.4 0.1 0.5 B737 -500 1.8 0.7 2.5 B737-700 22.6 4.7 27.3 B737 -800 36.3 10.3 46.7 B737 -900 0.0 0.0 0.0 B747-100 0.0 0.0 0.0 B747 -200 0.1 0.1 0.1 B747 -400 1.7 0.0 1.7 B757-200 39.6 6.5 46.2 B757-300 26.8 1.8 28.6 B767 -200 1.5 0.1 1.6 B767 -300 2.2 0.1 2.3 9767 -400 0.8 0.6 1.4 B777 -200 0.0 0.0 0.0 B777 -300 0.0 0.0 0.0 BA46 0.0 0.0 0.0 BEC400 1.5 0.1 1.6 C500 0.0 0.0 0.0 C650 0.0 0.0 0.0 C750 0.0 0.0 0.0 CARJ /CL601 333.8 16.2 350.1 CL600 1.2 0.1 1.3 CNA500 0.1 0.0 0.1 CNA501 0.1 0.0 0.1 CNA525 1.0 0.0 1.0 CNA550 0.7 0.0 0.7 CNA551 0.0 0.0 0.0 CNA560 5.4 0.3 5.7 CNA650 2.6 0.2 2.8 CNA750 5.6 0.5 6.1 DC10 2.9 1.5 4.4 DC820 0.0 0.0 0.0 DC860 0.0 0.0 0.0 Grou Table 2.2 MINNEAPOLIS -ST. PAUL INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT 2010 Aircraft Fleet Mix Average Daily Operations Aircraft T .g4 Da Ni ht Total 9 10 DC87 E145 EMB135 0.5 0.0 2.9 2.0 0.0 2.9 EMB145 30.6 33.3 EMB170 119.4 125.5 EMB190 1.9 2.0 GLF4 0.0 0.0 GLF5 1.1 1.2 GLFIV 1.4 1.5 HS125 4.0 4.3 IA1124 0.1 0.1 IA1125 0.5 0.5 L101 0.0 0 0 0.0 LEAR31 0.3 0.3 LEAR35 2.2 2.5 LEAR45 1.9 2.0 LEAR55 0.2 0.2 LEAR60 0.7 0.8 M D11 GE 2.0 3.6 MD81 31.0 33.0 MD83 0.0 0.0 MD9025 32.3 34.8 MU300 0.0 0.0 SABR65 0.0 0.1 SBR2 0.0 0.0 Total 935.0 83.7 1018.6 Hushkit 727Q 0.7 1.5 Stage 3 Jet 737Q 0.1 0 0.1 BAC111 0.0 0.0 DC9Q 61.6 63.0 Total 62.4 2.0 64.6 Microjet CNA510 0.1 0.0 0.1 Total 0.1 0.0 0.1 Stage 2 FAL10 0.1 0.0 0.1 Less than FAL200 0.6 0.7 1.3 75,000 lb. MTOW FAL20A 0.7 0.0 0.7 GI! 1.4 0.1 1.5 GIII 0.2 0.0 0.2 .EAR24 0.0 0.0 0.0 .EAR25 0.0 0.0 0.1 ;ABR75 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total 3.0 0.8 3.9 Propeller A748 lEC100 lEC190 000000 --', 00 0 N CP 0 0 " 0 IEC200 BEC23 0 O 0 BEC24 BEC300 BEC3OB BEC33 BEC55 10 BEC58 0.2 0.0 0.2 BEC60 0.0 0.0 0.0 BEC65 7.2 1.5 8.7 BEC80 2.2 0.3 2.4 BEC90 0.6 0.2 0.8 BEC95 0.0 0.0 0.0 BEC99 5.0 0.9 5.9 BL26 0.0 0.0 0.0 CNA150 0.0 0.0 0.0 CNA170 0.0 0.0 0.0 CNA172 0.1 0.0 0.1 CNA177 0.0 0.0 0.0 CNA180 0.0 0.0 0.0 CNA182 0.0 0.0 0.0 CNA185 0.0 0.0 0.0 CNA205 0.0 0.0 0.0 CNA206 0.1 0.0 0.1 CNA208 0.6 0.1 0.7 CNA210 0.1 0.0 0.1 CNA303 0.0 0.0 0.0 CNA310 0.1 0.0 0.1 CNA320 0.0 0.0 0.0 CNA337 0.0 0.0 0.0 CNA340 0.1 0.0 0.1 CNA401 0.0 0.0 0.0 CNA402 0.1 0.0 0.1 CNA404 0.0 0.0 0.0 CNA414 0.3 0.0 0.3 CNA421 0.2 0.0 0.2 CNA425 0.0 0.0 0.0 CNA441 0.2 0.0 0.2 DHC6 0.0 0.0 0.0 DHC8 0.0 0.0 0.0 DO328 0.1 0.0 0.1 EMB110 0.0 0.0 0.0 FK27 0.0 0.0 0.0 GASEPF 0.3 0.0 0.3 GASEPV 0.2 0.0 0.3 GULF1 . 0.2 0.0 0.2 LA42 0.0 0.0 0.0 M20J 0.3 0.0 0.4 MU2 0.0 0.0 0.0 PA23AZ 0.0 0.0 0.0 PA24 0.0 0.0 0.0 PA28 0.1 0.0 0.1 PA30 0.0 0.0 0.0 PA31 0.6 0.1 0.6 PA32 0.2 0.0 0.2 PA34 0.2 0.0 0.3 PA42 0.0 0.0 0.0 PA44 0.0 0.0 0.0 PA46 0.1 0.0 0.1 PA60 0.0 0.0 0.1 11 2.1.3 2010 Runway Use FAA control of runway use throughout the year for arrival and departure operations at MSP has a notable effect on the noise impact around the airport. The number of people and dwellings impacted by noise is a direct result of the number of operations on a given runway and the land uses off the end of the runway. Historically, prior to the opening of Runway 17/35, arrival and departure operations occurred on the parallel runways at MSP (12U30R and 12R/30L) in a manner that resulted in approximately 50 percent of the arrival and departure operations occurring to the northwest over South Minneapolis and 50 percent to the southeast over Mendota Heights and Eagan. As a result of the dense residential land uses to the northwest and the predominantly industriaVcommercial land uses to the southeast of MSP, focusing arrival and departure operations to the southeast has long been the preferred configuration from a noise reduction perspective. 89 12 CM 69 IIER2 IIER3 IIER4 X330 340 0.0 0.0 0.1 1.5 0.0 65.9 w 0 0 0 0 0 N O O O O O 0.0 0.0 0.1 1.6 0.0 69.1 Total 92.9 6.7 100.2 Helicopter 109 06L 212 222 .130 22 70 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o a o 0 0 o a o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 0.0 0.0 0.0 Military Jet 130 17 ;5 9A .18 5GE F5E KC135 T -38A T1 T34 T37 T38 U21 T- o 0 0 0 0 0 0'- o 0 0 0 0 . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 v o 0 0 on 0 0. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 3.2 0.2 3.5 Total Operations 1096.6 93.4 1190.9 2.1.3 2010 Runway Use FAA control of runway use throughout the year for arrival and departure operations at MSP has a notable effect on the noise impact around the airport. The number of people and dwellings impacted by noise is a direct result of the number of operations on a given runway and the land uses off the end of the runway. Historically, prior to the opening of Runway 17/35, arrival and departure operations occurred on the parallel runways at MSP (12U30R and 12R/30L) in a manner that resulted in approximately 50 percent of the arrival and departure operations occurring to the northwest over South Minneapolis and 50 percent to the southeast over Mendota Heights and Eagan. As a result of the dense residential land uses to the northwest and the predominantly industriaVcommercial land uses to the southeast of MSP, focusing arrival and departure operations to the southeast has long been the preferred configuration from a noise reduction perspective. 89 12 Op Type Runway Day Night Total Arrivals 4 0.0% 0.1% 0.0% 12L 19.9% 14.0% 19.4% 12R 19.1% 24.8% 19.6% 17 0.1% 0.0% 0.1% 22 0.3% 0.9% 0.4% 30L 17.9% 36.4% 19.4% 30R 22.2% 22.1% 22.2% 35 20.6% 1.8% 19.0% Total 100.0% 1 100.0% 100.0% Departures 4 0.1% 0.1% 0.1% 12L 12.6% 17.4% 12.9% 12R 6.5% 25.4% 8.0% 17 21.8% 14.2% 21.2% 22 0.4% 0.6% 0.4% 30L 26.2% 22.4% 25.9% 30R 32.5% 19.9% 31.6% 35 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Total 100.0% 1 100.0% 100.0% Overall 4 0.0% 0.1% 0.0% 12L 16.2% 15.6% 16.2% 12R 12.8% 25.1% 13.8% 17 10.9% 6.8% 10.6% 22 0.3% 0.7% 0.4% 30L 22.0% 29.7% 22.6% 30R 27.3% 21.1% 26.8% 35 10.3% 0.9% 9.6% Total 100.0% ( 100.0% 100.0% Since the introduction of Runway 17/35 at MSP in 2005, another opportunity exists to route aircraft over an unpopulated area - the Minnesota River Valley. With use of the Runway 17 Departure Procedure, westbound departure operations off Runway 17 are routed such that they avoid close - in residential areas southwest of the new MINNEAPOLIS-ST. PAUL INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT runway. Thus, use of Runway 17 for departure operations is the second preferred operational configuration (after Runways 12L and 12R) for noise reduction purposes. Note: Total SOURCES: MACNOMS data for 2010. 2.1.4 2010 Flight Tracks Table 2.3 2010 Runway Use not add u to 100% due to roundin ma 2.1.5 2010 Atmospheric Conditions was used to calculate runway use In large part, the INM flight tracks used to develop the 2010 actual noise contour are identical to those used for the 2009 actual noise contour. The tracks are also consistent with those used previously to develop the 2007 forecast mitigated noise contour, with the exception of Runways 17, 35, and 4 departure tracks. The MAC updated the INM departure tracks to conform to actual radar flight track data for Runway 17 and the use of Runways 35 and 4 during the 2009 reconstruction of Runway 12U30R. Figures 2.1 to 2.16 provide the INM departure and arrival flight track and use information that the MAC used to develop the 2010 actual noise contour. The MAC gathered atmospheric data for the 2010 actual noise contour from the National Weather Service (NWS) and the Minnesota State Climatologist's Office. The MAC used the NWS's 2010 13 Qc Table 2.3 provides the runway use percentages for 2010. From 2009 to 2010 arrival operations percentages decreased on Runways 30L, 17, 22, and 35 (Runway 4 2009 and 2010 arrival percentages were identical) and increased on Runways 30R, 12R, and 12L. The most notable change in arrival runway use from 2009 to 2010 was a 5.1 percent increase in Runway 12L arrival operations. The most notable change in arrival runway use during the nighttime hours was also on Runway 12L, where operations increased from 11.2 percent in 2009 to 14.0 percent in 2010. Departure operations decreased on Runways 4, 30L, and 12R (Runway 35 2009 and 2010 departure percentages were identical) and increased on Runways 12L, 17, 22 and 30R from 2009 to 2010. The most notable change in departure runway use from 2009 to 2010 was a 5.6 percent reduction in Runway 12R departure operations. The most notable change in departure runway use during the nighttime hours was on Runway 12L, where operations increased from 14.4 percent in 2009 to 17.4 percent in 2010. 2010 INM Tracks - Runway 30L Departures Overall Use Percentage Figure 2.1 Note The thkkness of the !NM tracks as displayed on this map is a function of overall use percentage 2010 INM Tracks - Runway 30R Departures Overall Use Percentage Figure 2.2 Not The tfi kne of the /NM tracks as displayed on th map is a function of overall us percentage tbick essafthe.01Utecks ed on this map is a function retail use percentage 2010 INM Tracks - Runway 12L Departures Overall Use Percentage Figure 2.4 2010 INM Tracks - Runway 22 Departures Overall Use Percentage Figure 2.6 ' r lk � n �J Note The thickness of thelINM tracks as displayed on this map ii io a func n of overall use perce tape _ — 2010 INM Tracks - Runway 35 Arrivals Overall Use Percentage Figure 2.14 0 0 Note The thickness of the INM tracks as displayed on this map is a function of overall use percentage Z. O o O 0 Ibtp 2010 INM Tracks - Runway 17 Arrivals Overall Use Percentage Figure 2.16 , .. tt. ficthkknusofthetNM / tracks displayed onthis map is a function at use percentage annual average temperature of 49.9 degrees Fahrenheit and 2010 average annual wind speed of 8.2 Kts. in the INM modeling process. The MAC also used a 2010 average annual pressure of 29.98 inches and a 2010 annual average relative humidity of 63.9 percent, as reported by the Minnesota State Climatologist's Office. 2.2 2010 Modeled Versus Measured DNL Levels As part of the 2010 actual noise contour development process, the MAC conducted a correlation analysis comparing the INM - developed 2010 DNL noise contours to actual measured aircraft noise levels at the 39 MAC Noise and Operations Monitoring System (MACNOMS) Remote Monitoring Towers (RMTs) around MSP in 2010. The MAC conducted an INM grid point analysis to determine the model's predicted 2010 DNL noise levels at each of the RMT locations (determined in the INM by the latitude and longitude coordinates of each RMT). Table 2.4 provides a comparison of the INM grid point analysis at each MACNOMS RMT site, based on the 2010 actual noise contour as produced with the INM, and the actual MACNOMS monitored aircraft DNLs at those locations in 2010. 1 55.5 55.0 -05 0.5 2 57.6 55.9 -1 7 1.7 3 62.2 61.8 -0.4 0.4 a absolute difference between the 4 602 67.9 -0.3 0.3 The average 5 68.2 67.9 -0.3 0.3 692 66.8 -2.4 2.4 519 57.9 -1.0 1.0 modeled and measured DNLs was 1.8 dB (the 2009 average absolute difference was 1.3 dB). The median 8 57.3 56.0 -1.3 1.3 9 50.9 46.1 -4.8 4.8 difference was 1.1 dB (the 2009 median difference 10 53.8 50.8 - a.o 3.0 11 44.7 43.6 -1.1 1.1 was 1.0 dB). The MACNOMS RMTs, on average, 12 37.3 460 8.7 8.7 524 reported slightly higher DNL levels than the INM 13 599 59 -03 03 model generated. The MAC believes that this is due in 15 542 541 -0.1 0.1 9 16 63.5 61.9 -1.6 1.6 part to the inclusive approach MAC staff has taken in 17 481 48.6 1.5 1.5 18 56.7 57.2 0.5 0.5 tuning MACNOMS noise -to -track matching 19 51.7 52.5 0.8 0.8 20 414 48.3 49 49 parameters. This conservative approach, along with 21 481 49.8 1.7 1.7 22 545 55.1 as 0.6 the increasing number of quieter jets operating at the 23 598 590 - 0.6 as 24 57.8 58.3 0.5 0.5 airport, results in increased instances of community- 25 50.3 53.9 16 16 driven noise events being attributed to quieter aircraft 26 527 56.0 0 3 2.0 g q 27 55.7 56.0 0 3 0.3 operating at further distances from the monitoring 28 57.4 59.5 21 2.1 P 9 9 29 51.2 51.2 0.0 0.0 location. The use of absolute values provides a 30 60.1 59.0 -1.1 1.1 31 45.8 47.8 20 2.0 perspective of total difference between the INM 32 41.7 45.0 3.3 3.3 33 45.7 48.8 3.1 3.1 modeled values and the measured DNL values 34 426 47.5 49 4.9 provided by MACNOMS in 2010. The median is 35 521 529 1.4 1. considered the most reliable indicator of correlation 37 46.0 4.7 1.7 1.7 38 48.4 49.4 1.0 1.0 when considering the data variability across modeled 39 542 51.2 1.0 1.0 Avenge 1.8 and monitored data. Median 1.1 ol 14 Table 2.4 MNNEAPOUS.ST. PAUL INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT 2010 Measured vs. Modeled INM DNL Values at MACNOMS RMT Locations 2010 Annual 2010 Measured DNL Modeled (a) DNL Difference (Modeled minus Measu S•n Absolute Notes: All units in d8 DNL (a) computed from daily ONLs Overall, the small variation between the actual MACNOMS monitored aircraft noise levels and the INM modeled noise levels provides additional external system verification that the INM is providing an accurate assessment of the aircraft noise impacts around MSP. SOURCE MAC RMT data City Count Dwelling Units Within DNL (dB) Interval Single Family Mufti- Family I 60-64 65-59 70-74 75+ Total 60-64 65-69 70-74 75+ Total Minneapolis Competed 4958 Additional 849 1823 - - - - - 6781 849 57 452 486 - - - - - 543 452 Total 5807 1823 - - 7630 509 486 - - 995 Bloomington Completed Additional 76 - 2 - - - - - 78 - 447 - 618 - - - - - 1065 - Total 76 2 - - 78 447 618 - - 1065 Richfield Completed Additional 579 21 67 - - - - - 646 21 32 37 - - - - - - 32 37 Total 600 67 - - 667 69 - - - 69 Eagan Competed Additional 163 0 1 - - - - - 164 - - - - - - - - - - - Total 163 1 - - 164 - - - - - Mendota Heights Completed Additional 53 - 1 - - - - - 54 - - - - - - - - - - - Total 53 1 - - 54 - - - - - All Cities Completed Additional 5829 870 1894 - - - - - 7723 870 1025 489 1104 - - - - - 1640 489 Total 6699 1894 - - 8593 1025 1104 - - 2129 2.3 2010 Noise Contour Impacts Based on the 435,583 total operations in 2010, approximately 3972.2 acres are in the 65 DNL noise contour (a reduction of 800.0 acres from the 2009 actual noise contour) and approximately 9,276.7 acres are in the 60 DNL noise contour (a reduction of 1,641.9 acres from the 2009 actual noise contour). Table 2.5 contains the count of single - family (one to three units per structure) and multi-family (more than three units per structure) dwelling units in the 2010 actual noise contours. The MAC based the counts on the block intersect methodology where all structures on a block that are within or touched by the noise contour are counted. Table 25 MINNEAPOLISST.PAUL INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT Summary of 2010 Actual DNL Noise Contour Single Family and Multi- Family Unit Counts (Block Intersect Implementation Method. Competed Reflect All Units Completed Prior to 21120111 The 2010 count of residential units within the actual 60 DNL noise contour that have not received noise mitigation around MSP is 1,359, a reduction of 60.8 percent from the total of 3,464 based on the 2009 actual noise contours. There are no unmitigated homes in the 2010 actual 65 DNL noise contour around MSP. All homes within the 2010 actual 60+ DNL contours will be mitigated by 2014 by virtue of the noise litigation Consent Decree. This significant reduction is due in large part to a 30.4 percent reduction in hushkitted aircraft operations and a 13.6 percent reduction in nighttime operations from 2009 to 2010. A depiction of the 2010 actual noise contour is provided in Figure 2.17. The 2007, 2008, 2009 and 2010 actual noise contours are provided in Figure 2.18. The 2010 actual 65 DNL noise contour is 16.8 percent smaller than the 2009 actual 65 DNL noise contour and the 2010 actual 60 DNL noise contour is 15.0 percent smaller than the 2009 actual 60 DNL noise contour. l og 15 fl : © m joci Component 2010 Actual* 2007 Forecasted Scheduled Passenger Air Carrier (a) 394,407 523,472 Cargo 12,049 21158 Charter 103 5,766 GA 26,185 28,846 Military 2,839 3,124 TOTAL 435,583 582,366 Chapter 3 Comparison of the 2010 Actual Noise Contour and the 2007 Forecast Noise Contour This chapter provides a detailed comparative analysis of the 2010 actual and 2007 forecast mitigated noise contours, focusing on the significant noise modeling variables and noise impacts at MSP. 3.1 Comparison of 2010 Actual and 2007 Forecast Noise Contour Inputs 3.1.1 Integrated Noise Model Considerations To develop the actual 2010 contour the MAC used Integrated Noise Model (INM) Version 7.0b, which is the latest version of the model available for use incorporating new lateral attenuation capabilities and updates to noise and performance data for commercial aircraft, updates to substitution aircraft data, and corrections to minor software issues. The MAC developed the 2007 forecast mitigated contour using INM Version 6.1. When comparing the 2007 forecast mitigated noise contour to the 2010 actual noise contour, the MAC notes that the new lateral attenuation capabilities that were incorporated into the previous 7.0 INM update have the effect of increasing the size of the 2010 actual noise contour by as much as 3 -10 percent over what INM 6.1 would have modeled. 3.1.2 Aircraft Operations and Fleet Mix Comparison Table 3.1 provides a comparison of total MSP operations by operational category used in the 2007 forecast mitigated noise contour and the 2010 actual noise contour. Table 3.1 MINNEAPOLIS -ST. PAUL INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT 2007 Mitigated Forecast vs. 2010 Actual Annual Total Operations Summa Notes: (a) Includes both air carrier and regional carrier operations * Based on actual year -to -date 2009 MACNOMS data adjusted to match FAA ATADS data (to account for unavailable MACNOMS operations data). 111 16 As is indicated in Table 3.1, the 2010 actual total MSP operations number of 435,583 represents a 25.2 percent reduction from the 2007 forecast mitigated total operations number of 582,366. Scheduled passenger air carrier and cargo operations accounted for the majority of the reduction. However, it is notable that charter operations are 98.2 percent below the 2007 forecast mitigated number. Table 3.2 provides a comparison of the 2007 forecast mitigated noise contour fleet mix and the 2010 actual noise contour fleet mix. An assessment of average daily operations per aircraft type with daytime and nighttime operation statistics is provided. 17 Table 3.2 MINNEAPOLIS -ST. PAUL INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT Comparison of 2007 Mitigated Forecast Fleet Nix and 2010 Actual Fleet Mix Average Daily Operations 113 18 Day Night Total 2007 2010 2007 2010 2007 2010 Difference Forecast Group Aircraft Type Forecast Actual Forecast Actual Forecast Actual and Actual Manufactured/ A300 -622R 4.8 0.1 4.2 0.1 9.1 0.1 -9.0 Re- engined A300B4 -203 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Stage 3 Jet A310 -304 1.4 0.0 1.3 0.0 2.7 0.0 -2.7 A318 5.7 0.0 0.5 0.0 6.2 0.0 -6.2 A319 -131 149.1 92.2 3.9 6.5 153.0 98.7 -54.3 A320 -211 173.4 92.8 16.5 11.7 189.9 104.5 -85.4 A321 -232 0.0 2.1 0.0 0.9 0.0 3.0 3.0 A330 6.2 5.2 0.0 0.5 6.2 5.6 -0.6 A340 2.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.1 0.0 -2.1 ASTR 2.3 0.0 0.2 0.0 2.5 0.0 -2.5 B717 -200 7.3 8.4 1.0 1.5 8.3 9.9 1.6 B737 -300 48.2 12.5 3.5 0.9 51.7 13.4 -38.3 8737 -400 0.1 0.4 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.5 0.4 B737 -500 5.7 1.8 0.5 0.7 6.2 2.5 -3.7 B737 -700 7.8 22.6 0.5 4.7 8.3 27.3 19.0 8737 -800 65.5 36.3 12.6 10.3 78.1 46.7 -31.4 B737 -900 5.7 0.0 0.5 0.0 6.2 0.0 -6.2 B747 -100 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 8747 -200 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.1 B747 -400 1.9 1.7 0.2 0.0 2.1 1.7 -0.4 B757 -200 88.4 39.6 8.6 6.5 97.1 46.2 -50.9 B757 -300 34.1 26.8 1.1 1.8 35.1 28.6 -6.5 B767 -200 1.2 1.5 0.5 0.1 1.7 1.6 -0.1 B767-300 0.0 2.2 0.0 0.1 0.0 2.3 2.3 8767 -400 0.0 0.8 0.0 0.6 0.0 1.4 1.4 B777 -200 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 8777 -300 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 BA46 74.3 0.0 2.2 0.0 76.5 0.0 -76.5 BEC400 0.0 1.5 0.0 0.1 0.0 1.6 1.6 C500 1.4 0.0 0.1 0.0 1.4 0.0 -1.4 C650 4.9 0.0 0.6 0.0 5.5 0.0 -5.5 C750 4.6 0.0 0.3 0.0 4.9 0.0 -4.9 CARJ /CL601 264.1 333.8 14.7 16.2 278.8 350.1 71.3 CL600 0.0 1.2 0.0 0.1 0.0 1.3 1.3 CNA500 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 CNA501 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 CNA525 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 CNA550 0.0 0.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.7 0.7 CNA551 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 CNA560 0.0 5.4 0.0 0.3 0.0 5.7 5.7 CNA650 0.0 2.6 0.0 0.2 0.0 2.8 2.8 CNA750 0.0 5.6 0.0 0.5 0.0 6.1 6.1 Table 3.2 MINNEAPOLIS -ST. PAUL INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT Comparison of 2007 Mitigated Forecast Fleet Nix and 2010 Actual Fleet Mix Average Daily Operations 113 18 Total 727Q 737Q BAC111 DC9Q Total CNA510 Total FAL10 FAL200 FAL20A GI I GIII LEAR24 LEAR25 SABR75 Total 1070.5 935.0 8.0 0.0 0.0 245.3 0.7 0.1 0.0 61.6 253.3 62.4 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.6 1.0 2.1 0.0 0.0 2.1 0.0 0.7 1.4 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 5.2 3.0 84.3 83.7 6.4 0.0 0.0 15.3 0.7 0.0 0.0 1.3 21.7 2.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.7 0.7 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.3 0.8 1155.0 1018.6 14.4 0.0 0.0 260.5 1.5 0.1 0.0 63.0 274.9 64.6 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.0 1.3 1.7 2.3 0.0 0.0 2.5 0.0 0.7 1.5 0.2 0.0 0.1 0.0 6.5 3.9 Hushkit Stage 3 Jet Microjet Stage 2 Less than 75,000 lb. MTOW Propeller DC10 DC820 DC860 DC87 El 45 EMB135 EMB145 EMB170 EMB190 GLF4 GLF5 GLFIV HS125 IA1124 IA1125 L101 LEAR31 LEAR35 LEAR45 LEAR55 LEAR60 MD11GE MD81 MD83 MD9025 MU300 SABR65 SBR2 A748 BEC100 BEC190 BEC200 BEC23 BEC24 BEC300 BEC30B 9.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 45.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.6 0.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.6 0.0 26.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.5 17.0 0.0 7.2 0.0 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.9 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.0 2.9 30.6 119.4 1.9 0.0 1.1 1.4 4.0 0.1 0.5 0.0 0.3 2.2 1.9 0.2 0.7 2.0 31.0 0.0 32.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.8 1.5 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.2 3.8 0.0 0.0 1.4 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 2.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.0 1.6 0.0 0.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1 y 19 1.5 0.0 0.0 1.5 0.0 0.1 2.7 6.1 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.4 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.1 0.0 0.0 1.6 2.0 0.0 2.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 13.4 0.0 0.0 1.4 45.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.8 0.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.8 0.0 28.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.7 0.6 18.6 0.0 7.8 0.0 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.4 0.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 2.9 33.3 125.5 2.0 0.0 1.2 1.5 4.3 0.1 0.5 0.0 0.3 2.5 2.0 0.2 0.8 3.6 33.0 0.0 34.8 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 4.1 1.7 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.2 -9.0 0.0 0.0 0.6 -45.5 2.9 33.3 125.5 2.0 -2.8 0.3 1.5 4.3 0.1 0.5 -0.8 0.3 -25.9 2.0 0.2 0.8 2.9 32.4 -18.6 34.8 -7.8 0.1 -0.4 -136.4 -12.9 0.1 0.0 -197.5 -210.3 0.1 0.1 0.1 1.3 -1.0 -0.8 0.2 0.0 -2.4 0.0 -2.6 0.0 0.1 4.1 1.7 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.2 BEC33 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 BEC55 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 BEC58 14.3 0.2 4.7 0.0 19.0 0.2 -18.8 BEC60 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 BEC65 0.0 7.2 0.0 1.5 0.0 8.7 8.7 BEC80 0.0 2.2 0.0 0.3 0.0 2.4 2.4 BEC90 0.0 0.6 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.8 0.8 BEC95 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 BEC99 0.0 5.0 0.0 0.9 0.0 5.9 5.9 BL26 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 CNA150 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 CNA170 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 CNA172 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 CNA177 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 CNA180 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 CNA182 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 CNA185 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 CNA205 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 CNA206 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 CNA208 0.0 0.6 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.7 0,7 CNA210 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 CNA303 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 CNA310 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 CNA320 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 CNA337 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 CNA340 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 CNA401 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 CNA402 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 CNA404 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 CNA414 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.3 CNA421 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.2 CNA425 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 CNA441 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.2 DHC6 22.5 0.0 4.4 0.0 26.8 0.0 -26.8 DHC8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 D0328 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 EMB110 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 FK27 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 -0.1 GASEPF 1.3 0.3 0.3 0.0 1.6 0.3 -1.3 GASEPV 3.7 0.2 0.5 0.0 4.3 0.3 -4.0 GULF1 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.2 LA42 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 M20J 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.4 MU2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 PA23AZ 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 PA24 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 PA28 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 PA30 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 PA31 0.0 0.6 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.6 0.6 PA32 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.2 PA34 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.3 PA42 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 PA44 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 PA46 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 20 In general, many of the aircraft types operating at MSP showed a reduction in the number of average daily operations from the 2007 forecast mitigated to the 2010 actual operations statistics. Manufactured Stage 3 aircraft average daily operations in the 2010 actual statistics were down 11.8 percent from the 2007 forecast mitigated number. The hushkitted Stage 3 average daily operations in the 2010 actual statistics were down 76.5 percent from the 2007 forecast mitigated number. In total, the 2010 actual average daily number of operations was 1,190.9, which is a 25.4 percent reduction from the 2007 forecast mitigated of 1,595.5 operations. Nighttime operations decreased by 29.9 average daily operations from the 2007 forecast mitigated to the 2010 actual operations statistics. 3.1.3 Runway Use Comparison Table 3.3 provides a comparison of the 2007 forecast mitigated noise contour and the 2010 actual noise contour runway use percentages. 21 1 i d PA60 RWCM69 SAMER2 SAMER3 SAMER4 SD330 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 1.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 1.6 0.0 69.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 1.6 0.0 -30.1 Total 135.2 92.9 15.8 6.7 151.0 100.2 -50.8 Helicopter 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Military Jet C130 0 7 7 o 07 o o o o 7 7 0 9 9 oo9 O0000 9 00 F16GE F5E 0 0 0 0 0 0 KC135 T -38A T1 T34 T37 T38 U21 Total 8.2 3.2 0.2 0.2 8.5 3.5 -5.0 Total Operations 1472.4 1096.6 123.3 93.4 1595.9 1190.9 -405.0 In general, many of the aircraft types operating at MSP showed a reduction in the number of average daily operations from the 2007 forecast mitigated to the 2010 actual operations statistics. Manufactured Stage 3 aircraft average daily operations in the 2010 actual statistics were down 11.8 percent from the 2007 forecast mitigated number. The hushkitted Stage 3 average daily operations in the 2010 actual statistics were down 76.5 percent from the 2007 forecast mitigated number. In total, the 2010 actual average daily number of operations was 1,190.9, which is a 25.4 percent reduction from the 2007 forecast mitigated of 1,595.5 operations. Nighttime operations decreased by 29.9 average daily operations from the 2007 forecast mitigated to the 2010 actual operations statistics. 3.1.3 Runway Use Comparison Table 3.3 provides a comparison of the 2007 forecast mitigated noise contour and the 2010 actual noise contour runway use percentages. 21 1 i d Op Type Runway Day Night Total 2007 Fcst. 2010 Actual 2007 Fcst. 2010 Actual 2007 Fcst. 2010 Actual Arrivals J C -I IX V 'N-- N (4 N " N O () M 0.0% 0.0% 3.8% 0.1% 0.3% 0.0% 21.8% 19.9% 17.2% 14.0% 21.4% 19.4% 14.7% 19.1% 12.4% 24.8% 14.5% 19.6% 0.0% 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.1% 0.5% 0.3% 2.4% 0.9% 0.6% 0.4% 21.1% 17.9% 25.1% 36.4% 21.4% 19.4% 25.1% 22.2% 26.4% 22.1% 25.2% 22.2% 16.9% 20.6% 12.7% 1.8% 16.5% 19.0% Total 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% Departures 4 0.2% 0.1% 0.4% 0.1% 0.2% 0.1% 12L 8.9% 12.6% 14.1% 17.4% 9.3% 12.9% 12R 15.9% 6.5% 18.3% 25.4% 16.1% 8.0% 17 37.2% 21.8% 34.6% 14.2% 37.0% 21.2% 22 0.1% 0.4% 0.8% 0.6% 0.1% 0.4% 30L 15.0% 26.2% 12.8% 22.4% 14.8% 25.9% 30R 22.7% 32.5% 19.2% 19.9% 22.4% 31.6% 35 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Total 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% Overall 4 0.1% 0.9% 2.1% 0.9% 0.3% 0.9% 12L 15.3% 11.6% 15.6% 129% 15.4% 11.7% 12R 15.3% 13.7% 15.3% 23.5% 15.3% 14.6% 17 18.6% 12.0% 17.1% 7.6% 18.5% 11.6% 22 0.3% 1.4% 1.6% 0.3% 0.4% 1.3% 30L 18.0% 24.3% 19.0% 30.6% 18.1% 24.9% 30R 23.9% 23.6% 22.8% 224% 23.8% 23.5% 35 8.4% 12.5% 6.4% 1.7% 8.3% 11.5% Total 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 3.1.4 Flight Track Considerations Table 3.3 MINNEAPOLIS -ST. PAUL INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT 2010 Actual and 2007 Mitigated Forecast Runway use Comparison Note: Rumay use for 2007 forecast reflects Part 150 mitigated 2007 runway use. Totals may not add up to 100% due to rounding. SOURCES. MACNOMS data was used to calculate runway use for 2010 Actual. Runway use for 2007 forecast was obtained from the November 2004 Part 150 document. A general evaluation of the runway use percentages in Table 3.3 indicates that use of Runway 17 for departure operations is well below the percentage use numbers forecasted in the 2007 mitigated scenario. The departure percentage on Runways 30L and 30R are notably higher, and the departure percentages on Runway 12R are notably lower, than what was forecasted in the 2007 forecast mitigated scenario. The nighttime departure percentage on Runway 17 is significantly lower, and the Runways 30L and 12R nighttime departure percentages are significantly higher, than the levels forecasted in the 2007 forecast mitigated scenario. The 2010 total arrival percentages correlated fairly well with the 2007 forecast mitigated scenario. However, nighttime arrival percentages on Runways 12R and 30L are significantly higher, and significantly lower on Runway 35, than the levels forecasted in the 2007 forecast mitigated scenario. As detailed in Section 2.1.4, the INM flight tracks the MAC used to develop the 2010 actual noise contour are identical to those used for the 2009 actual noise contour. The tracks are also consistent with those used previously to develop the 2007 forecast mitigated noise contour, with 22 117 the exception of Runways 17, 35, and 4 departure tracks. The MAC updated the INM departure tracks to conform to actual radar flight track data for Runway 17 and the use of Runways 35 and 4 during the 2009 reconstruction of Runway 12U30R. The MAC used new technologies and analysis methodologies for developing INM flight track operation statistics, and then used that INM flight track information in developing the 2010 actual noise contour. As was the case with the 2002 and 2006 actual noise contours at MSP, the MAC correlated radar flight track data to INM core flight tracks by using a geographic gate analysis. Once correlated to the core track, INM distributes operations to sub - tracks by a distribution percentage. The radar - to-INM flight track correlation process that the MAC used to develop the 2010 actual noise contour employs a best -fit analysis of the radar flight track data based on linear trends. This approach provides the ability to directly match each radar flight track to the appropriate INM track. The enhanced ability to interpret similarities along a track, rather than solely at a gate location, provides the ability to analyze all INM tracks as core tracks. The most notable changes in the contours from the 2007 forecast mitigated to the 2010 actual noise contour scenarios are a slight northwesterly shift, and a significant reduction, of the Runway 30R northbound departure heading lobe in the noise contour, a slight extension of the contour arrival lobe on Runway 12R and a significant reduction in the Runway 12L arrival lobe. The northwest shift and reduction in the Runway 30R northbound departure heading lobe are primarily a result of the refined INM flight track analysis conducted as part of the 2010 actual noise contour development and reduced departure usage of the northbound heading. The slightly larger arrival lobe on Runway 12R is a function of higher nighttime arrival operations on that runway, while the significant reduction in the Runway 12L arrival lobe in the contour is a result of lower arrival operations on that runway. 3.1.5 Atmospheric Conditions Comparison The MAC used an average annual temperature of 47.7 degrees Fahrenheit and an average annual wind speed of 5.3 Kts. in the 2007 forecast mitigated INM contour modeling process. The MAC also used an average annual pressure of 29.90 inches and an annual average relative humidity of 64 percent. As stated in Section 2.1.5, for the 2010 actual noise contour the MAC used a 2010 annual average temperature of 49.9 degrees Fahrenheit and a 2010 average annual wind speed of 8.2 Kts. in the INM modeling process. In addition, the MAC used a 2010 average annual pressure of 29.98 inches and a 2010 annual average relative humidity of 63.9 percent. 3.2 Comparative Integrated Noise Model Grid Point Analysis The MAC used the INM to conduct a grid point analysis based on the 2007 forecast mitigated noise contour and 2010 actual noise contour INM input files. The MAC used INM Version 6.2a for the 2007 forecast mitigated noise contour grid point analysis because this was the oldest version of INM available to MAC staff to conduct the analysis in early 2008 when the annual noise contour report process began at MSP. When comparing the DNL values generated for the MACNOMS RMT locations with INM 6.1 in the November 2004 Part 150 Update Document to the levels generated for those same locations with INM 6.2a, the differences were insignificant. The MAC generated DNL values for the center points of each city block included in the mitigation programs outlined in the Consent Decree. Figures 3.1 to 3.5 depict the 2010 actual grid point analysis area and the DNL levels calculated for each block by city. Figures 3.6 to 3.10 depict the 2007 forecast mitigated grid point analysis area and the DNL levels calculated for each block by 23 u� e ._ r. -. ._r. rv✓ € INSIMMIN MOM Via_•.- :ri — -- • _ usimg, >. ... ....... 0 a.m... ._t.► s- ars.r_s.. r.r_ _ ... s __ a __arias€_'_ ..— _ _aw__e..r.ia_ __ mimimmummpsit mamma aa_asr_a. mummmmimmumm a i ____• 's r- a ..a� A I r•u.__ MMMIIIMM vim AMOK � W IIII!II --�n aim......m — - - �-iw � timillIMEIMMEMIIIIIIII MI us 11111.11 1 .261111= OE 1111 �—� O N la= E'LS 9,95 9 4'LS € 6'85 9'09 CBSH 695 E85 CEIS TLS r'09 b'09 E09 r09 :V;19 61.9 1 ax Wan 699 65 L:09 1 6'99 Z19 9'15 8.09 1'E9 b'£9 6E9 b'b9 8'49 L9 �L�7 b.S9 .� r59, 1'99 b'99' L'S9 659 I ra 6'99 W19 ; 99 L9 r 9'E9 E;E9 W69 9'65 rei alt o mimminam Numasalmmas nammum mum NIMIE MIN NMI LLS immammumumair miumnamonamum VI J z 0 9✓ 3 d _H R O 7 Q o • c O � N Q E 2 0 N O1 J N 0 V N 0 M O O A S q9 O J 1 1 1 1 1 9'6S NOl9NIW0019""' S O9� 1111111M7 W MINIMUMS NM - - MM SINIMINMISMINIIIIII /OM SIIIIMMININIMMININS iMIN pilMININININSIMMO VII INIMI111111. 41 \I \ MSS MINI ININININNISMI ......0 MINIMMI ANSINININIIIIMIHMINNIMMOW AMIN IMINIMMININIMINIMIN -- u SIN MNIM/1///////////IIMIMM 4 WM INISMIIIMINIMMINIMIM ino llOMMII Ili INIUMIONO .IIIIIIIMMIINNI MO NIMINIMIONINAMOMMINN Larinz = = -moms iinionsammai maw einimmi••• 1111111111111111111101111111111MMI IMINSMINISMINIMIMMINIM INN 11111111101INIMMININIMINIMMINIIM --------- _ ___L"-- . , ki, , IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII ,.1 -":,,,MINI..slIMI1111111101011111111111111111101 , ,,MIIPIIIIINIIIMIIIIIIIIMIII,. MIMI la INNIMIM INNININ NINNIMMINIIIIMMINNINIBMINININIMMI 1111111111MINSININIMINNINNIMINNINIMI INIMINIMMINNINSIMMI INIIMMINNINNINIIMM INNINIMMIN 111111111111101111111111111111111111MINIMMINININ IIIIMMIN ININININININSIMMUIMMI ININSIMINN MINNINNININNIMININIMINN z 0 s M =— 11111111111111111111111111 an. .... um um_ am. i.. l— .... moo P 1 lc 1tro QW110 49 EM Z'[) 1J 9149 GAD lr�� 1 4'89 17'65 0'99 4'09 Si09 lyL 9 WL9 LQl9 EZ9 of 9 595 S'b9 8'99 0'89 L 9 6189 Zg69 £'89 0'89 9 , 5_8 gtE augil oa £'HS 8 S' n1:6.5, ffi 65 65 Si 09] o fi, 06S 1 65 L LS. W65 1$099 0 •=)`;'S thS t$, 17 8S 1 6( oy 65 ,L109 65 965 a._9 1r 7 665 485 1h094 tie8s tZi Si09 0 6c {[oa09 E'65, 9] L 65,VIM 09 REP AIMEE £Z9 OLZ9 19 4 6` X09 Ei09j "'i'9 •0 L Z9 tiL 6'59 49 65 ao r.09IC0 Mg 0 MIU 9109 ;s: 17'65 : 6 25 8 2 66c 609, 8' 19 Mal 95 9 L79.4 6 6 :9 179 ' 8 £9 Iry q09 taw zi£9 9'59 M_I ° ! _ G 1 OL IMP I [1l r xli 1 loco 8 L9 • .a Zi99 RlL9 tl 1 Wilmai0Kg =Pio 1111111M 0179.1 CM gag 6'99 lin AM 11 L' 1917 i 61£9 IMOD 79 5517m LgEd LjL tiro taat z rum f £g9'3 i9 Z9' :t_. £9 £9 1tb,9 £14:9 0i19 9'69 1161793 1 LC5S�71 iE9 0 b 09 K09 5 0'69 9i09 79 toiira£ t; L9 E 4E :M 9iti S'£9 8 £9 1'9' 9 E %L9 5 c>66 4b5 tF� 65 7 h tC1 06 565 09 C rr SZ9 N rgIVIOD ?�N larraLik 91L9 L�19 19v 6'09 14 J MEW L E 0r5 85 8v 5 migamommuniaiii W 531M 19' 9 H5: 1711 Z 065 r97 17'65 L'09 0 ;009],565 or `o C65 FT 5'65, E4i09J 6 ' L ti S 579 FiTO 6c 2,, b T 6 8S -:( °J °P Lrr 1 _ r S ! 65 Z'65 9 85' £65 8a09 1'66 E'65 8-8S„ 865 809 6'6S , L85_ 0'09 [9 091 £ 65 (585 1 2109 202-)) c8S' 1 65 KLLQ91 L'6' 2135. E'65 0;09 1 6S 17' 65" 9'65 S8S b 6S L'65 s amommu walmomum mow z 0 C 0 CL ▪ c l7 `° Qj w v a cn c u t rn O O LL- u_ O n m 0 O N w N Cu J U 0 a CO :0➢ I NMI -r• or �MI ms? \afii• MI I t aill r� -uE NINININININIIIINNINIIIIIIIIIIII 01111 MINIM MINIM ........: ......... • city. Figures 3.11 to 3.15 depict the difference in DNL levels, on a block -by -block basis, between the 2007 forecast mitigated noise contours and the 2010 actual noise contours. 3.3 Contour Comparison Summary The 2010 actual noise contour is smaller than the 2007 forecast mitigated contour by 6,431.6 acres (40.9 percent reduction) in the 60 DNL contour and by 3,262.2 acres (45.1 percent reduction) in the 65 DNL contour. As depicted in Figure 3.16, there is a small area in South Minneapolis where the 2010 actual noise contours extend beyond the 2007 forecast mitigated noise contours. However, there is an overall decrease of 2,627 residential units in the 65 DNL contour and 4,062 residential units in the 60 to 64 DNL noise contours around MSP when comparing the 2007 forecast mitigated contour with the 2010 actual contour that the MAC developed under the requirements of the Consent Decree. The small area where the 2010 actual noise contour extends beyond the 2007 forecast mitigated noise contour can largely be attributed to runway use variances between what was forecasted and what was occurring in 2010. Additionally, as detailed in Section 3.1.4, new technologies and analysis methodologies for developing INM flight track operation statistics were used in the development of the 2010 actual noise contour. The northwest shift and reduction in the Runway 30R northbound departure heading lobe is primarily a result of the refined INM flight track analysis conducted as part of the 2010 actual noise contour development and reduced departure usage of the northbound heading off Runway 30R. The slightly larger arrival lobe on Runway 12R is a function of higher nighttime arrival operations on that runway, while the significant reduction in the Runway 12L arrival lobe in the contour is a result of lower arrival operations on that runway. In summary, in addition to modeling enhancements, the primary factors to consider when comparing the 2007 forecast mitigated noise contours to the 2010 actual noise contours are total operation numbers, fleet mix, nighttime operations, and runway use. 2 As discussed in Section 3.1.1, it is also important to note that the new lateral attenuation capabilities incorporated into INM 7.0 increased the size of the 2010 actual noise contour by as much as 3-10 percent over the INM version 6.1 that the MAC used to develop the 2007 forecast mitigated noise contour. 24 ia9 .sra 41111MINNINNINNINNIN a‘11. INNINONNININNIONNIIIII 1.111 t 41=1111114/41111114/011111111110. Mei 4/411411•1114414 1111111111.11. AM INNINNININNININNOININn.W11.1b NW NONNIINNININIININNSIRNNA.V. Nam imeivaniiiime*AN N. 16.10•4 . r :�. Mini ..- ��E IN.►r6: z.►ar a.74.E.1 1 14 ..b '� grad T ti "Ow �► aaan. +w. avrAi .110:11 1 agar rsooka: 110 ‘04,..400. MB 11/M.NIMIIMObIN,16111.111106:1* —. NI �.► MrY. .►1w:�r. a1t►� sr. 11101110 tea► *a w. W 1►r0„ a w e• AOMMI 11001111%.1 16 ZINSIMAII0 1 111. aaar.� s :1:211; .11 ININNSINN Ow a a a alp OM SIB MI INN aelaasaltal autanamowati am s OM iialltallapa at ---- ' s .'_ woomot 2k74B.7► ea =�rEs imanalt MO I N 4IIININNI iw INNINIENENININININNININNINNINNINt . alawastamoumiasamax alloaanmaro iNVSV3ld ONVa9 131aaVH ioloewnH- a, OOOMNAri NOSa3W3 OaV1119— ---�-+ NOI9NIWOOI 3AOa9 HVO M 31 : 1 OHS.3JIyj aVO3J H191— HlaOM1N3M MO113d9NO1 H9W 1V 1NVAa9 YVd1OD C 4J E 4J 4-+ N N 0 4-+ cs1 O z v Vf U 0 I3 N 4— 0 V Hill MEMORANDUM TO: Finance, Development and Environment Committee FROM: John Nelson, Landside Project Manager (726.8133) SUBJECT: NOISE MITIGATION PROGRAM UPDATE DATE: February 1, 2011 ITEM 6 Under the terms of the Consent Decree settlement of the State by City of Minneapolis, et al. v. Metropolitan Airports Commission, et al, noise mitigation lawsuit, the Metropolitan Airports Commission (MAC) is required to provide certain Noise Mitigation Program services to single and multifamily homes that lie within the noise contours depicted on the 2007 Mitigated Noise Exposure Map. Further, MAC is required to adhere to a series of schedules contained within the Consent Decree for various tasks, notices, and project completion dates. In order to achieve compliance with the Consent Decree MAC is administering the Noise Mitigation Program as follows: Phase 1: Single Family Homes within the 2007 63 -64 DNL contours. These homes were eligible for noise mitigation modifications designed to achieve a five decibel reduction of exterior noise entering the home. Typical modifications include window and door treatments, the addition of storm windows and storm doors, attic and side wall insulation, roof vent baffles, and central air conditioning. A Phase 1 progress report is provided each month to the Committee. This phase of the project was substantially completed by December 31, 2009. Phase 2A: Single Family Homes within the 2007 60 -62 DNL contours. These homes are eligible to have central air conditioning installed, and homeowners may select up to $4,000 (2007 dollars) of additional mitigation from a Mitigation Menu list that has unit prices for the typical modifications provided in Phase 1 above. Homeowners in this bracket may also opt -out of Phase 2A and request to be placed in Phase 2B. December 1, 2012 scheduled completion. Phase 2B: Single Family Homes within the 2007 60 -62 DNL contours that have an existing central air conditioning system. Homeowners in this bracket may select up to $14,000 (2007 dollars) from a Mitigation Menu list that has unit prices for the typical modifications provided in Phase 1 above. December 1, 2012 scheduled completion. Phase 3: Single Family Homes within the 2005 60 -64 DNL contours that are not covered under Phases 1 or 2, and the 1992 -2005 Sound Insulation Program. Homeowners in this Phase may be reimbursed, starting in March 2010, for qualifying noise mitigation work they undertake at their own expense. MAC projects the reimbursement allocation available for each homeowner will be $2,850 in 2010 dollars. July 21, 2014 scheduled completion. Multifamily Phase: Multifamily Buildings within the 2007 60 -64 DNL contours. These buildings were provided with an acoustical cover for the pull through air conditioners, or if a pull through air conditioner does not exist, one was installed and also provided with an acoustical cover. This phase of the project was substantially completed by July 1, 2010. Attached to this memorandum is a listing of Consent Decree deadlines with MAC progress in the applicable line item noted in the "Status" column. THIS IS AN INFORMATIONAL ITEM ONLY; NO COMMITTEE ACTION IS REQUIRED. � 3 Lp 69 DATE MAC ACTION REQUIRED CONSENT DECREE PROVS1ON STATUS 10/19/2007 Judge Aldrich enters the Consent Decree. Court signature page, p. 52. 11/18/2007 MAC must begin to reassemble its residential noise mitigation program. Consent Decree § 5.5(a), p. 31. MAC completed this requirement in advance of November 18, 2007. 11/18/2007 MAC pays $2.25 million to the City of Minneapolis for attorneys' fees and costs. Consent Decree § 7.1, p. 37. Payment made. 12/17/2007 Parties must appoint their representatives and choose a third representative to the Technical Advisory Committee (TAC). Consent Decree § 8.4(e)(1), p. 43. MAC appointed Jeff Hamiel; the Cities appointed Merland Otto. Coral Houle is the third member. 01/17/2008 MAC must budget $7 million to be used for the mitigation programs for the DNL 63 and Higher Opt -In Homes, the DNL 60 -62 Opt -In Homes, and the Single- Family Homes Within the 2005 DNL 60 -64 Contours. Consent Decree § 5.3(a), p. 24. MAC completed this requirement in advance of January 17, 2008. 02/14/2008 MAC must pay $2 million in Wiencke attorneys' fees and costs. Wiencke Settlement Agreement Payment was made. 03/01/2008 MAC must prepare a noise contour using INM to reflect noise from the prior calendar year, using actual MSP operations data. Consent Decree § 8.1(d), pp. 38 -39. MAC has prepared a 2007 Noise Exposure Map 05/01/2008 MAC must begin the Preconstruction Phase of the mitigation program for Single- Family Homes Within the 2007 63 -64 DNL Contours and for the DNL 63 and Higher Opt -In Homes. Consent Decree § 5.5(b), p. 31. "Preconstruction Phase" means all project steps before the bid opening for individual home mitigation construction. See Consent Decree § 4.26. MAC began inviting homeowners into the preconstruction phase in April 2008. CITY OF MINNEAPOLIS v. MAC CONSENT DECREE DEADLINES' I Note: MAC must provide the Cities with monthly summaries of the number of homes completed, homes in construction, homes in preconstruction, and the amount expended for each mitigation program in Consent Decree §§ 5.1, 5.2, 5.3, and 5.4. MAC must also provide the Cities with access to all records and data, other than attorney- client communications, relating to the Decree's implementation (subject to the requirements of the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act). See Consent Decree § 8.3. 71 DATE MAC ACTION REQUIRED CONSENT DECREE PROVSION STATUS 07/01/2008 For Single - Family Homes Within the 2007 DNL 60 -62 Contours, MAC must identify the initial list of Approved Contractors who will install Mitigation Menu items, the initial Mitigation Menu including specific products that MAC will make available, and the form contracts that MAC will use. MAC must also provide "adequate information resources" to assist homeowners in selecting menu items. Consent Decree § 5.2(c) -(d), pp. 18 -20. Consent Decree § 4.1 defines "Approved Contractor" and Consent Decree § 4.14 defines "Mitigation Menu." See Consent Decree § 5.2(d) for a description of "adequate information resources." MAC provided the list of Approved Contractors and the Mitigation menu on July 1, 2008. 11/01/2008 MAC must begin the Construction Phase of the mitigation program for Single- Family Homes Within the 2007 63 -64 DNL Contours and for the DNL 63 and Higher Opt -In Homes. Consent Decree § 5.5(d), p. 31. Consent Decree § 4.4 defines "Construction Phase." MAC began the construction phase for the designated homes in mid - August 2008. 12/01/2008 MAC must begin the mitigation program for Single - Family Homes Within the 2007 DNL 60- 62 Contours (Consent Decree § 5.2) and for the mitigation program for the DNL 60 -62 Opt- In Homes (Consent Decree § 5.3(c)). Consent Decree § 5.5(i), p. 32. MAC must complete the mitigation program for Single - Family Homes Within the 2007 DNL 60- 62 Contours and for the DNL 60 -62 Opt -In Homes by 12/01/2012. There are no interim milestones for the programs. MAC opened bids for the window /door and insulation unit prices on December 16, 2008. 12/01/2008 MAC must begin the mitigation program for Multi - Family Homes Within the 2007 DNL 60 -64 Contours (Consent Decree § 5.4). Consent Decree § 5.5(j), p. 32. MAC must complete the mitigation program for Multi - Family Homes Within the 2007 DNL 60- 64 Contours by 12/01/2010. There are no interim milestones for the program. MAC has selected three multifamily buildings to be part of a noise mitigation Pilot Project that was bid in January 2009. The designs for these buildings were completed in December 2008. 72 � 39 DATE MAC ACTION REQUIRED CONSENT DECREE PROVSION STATUS 12/31/2008 • MAC must develop and make available the Noise Mitigation Reimbursement List. Consent Decree § 5.5(c), p. 31. Consent Decree § 4.20 defines "Noise Mitigation Reimbursement List," which is a list of products and services for the noise mitigation reimbursement program for Single - Family Homes Within the 2005 DNL 60 -64 Contours. Homeowners may receive reimbursement for only products and services on the list on or after 12/31/2008. See Consent Decree § 5.3(e). MAC has sent a letter containing the requested information for all of the affected homeowners. 12/31/2008 MAC must provide adequate information resources to all owners of Single - Family Homes Within the 2005 DNL 60 -64 Contours to assist in the selection of reimbursable mitigation measures. Consent Decree § 5.3(f), pp. 26 -27. See Consent Decree § 5.3(f) for a description of "adequate information resources." MAC may use the same information resources as used under § 5.2(d). MAC has sent a letter containing the requested information for all of the affected homeowners. 03/01/2009 MAC must prepare a noise contour using INM to reflect noise from the prior calendar year, using actual MSP operations data. Consent Decree § 8.1(d), pp. 38 -39. MAC has prepared a 2008 Noise Exposure Map 07/01/2009 MAC shall have provided formal written notice to all eligible homeowners that they may participate in the Preconstruction Phase of the program for Single - Family Homes Within the 2007 63 -64 DNL Contours and for the DNL 63 and Higher Opt -In Homes. Consent Decree § 5.5(e), p. 31. MAC provided written notice to all of the eligible homeowners, as applicable, in advance of July, 1, 2009. 07/01/2009 MAC must have completed the Construction Phase for a total of at least 250 Single - Family Homes Within the 2007 DNL 63- 64 Contours. Consent Decree § 5.5(f), p. 31. MAC completed the construction phase of at least 250 Single- Family Homes Within the 2007 DNL 63 -64 Contours in advance of July 1, 2009. 09/01/2009 MAC must have completed the Consent Decree § MAC completed the 1 73 DATE MAC ACTION REQUIRED CONSENT DECREE PROVSION STATUS Construction Phase for an aggregate total of at least 320 Single- Family Homes Within the 2007 DNL 63 -64 Contours. 5.5(g), p. 32. construction phase of at least 320 Single- Family Homes Within the 2007 DNL 63 -64 Contours in advance of September 1, 2009 12/31/2009 MAC must have completed the Construction Phase for the mitigation program for all Single- Family Homes Within the 2007 DNL 63 -64 Contours and for all DNL 63 and Higher Opt -In Homes. Consent Decree § 5.5(h), p. 32. MAC completed the construction phase of a total of 400 Single - Family Homes Within the 2007 DNL 63 -64 Contours in advance of December 31, 2009 12/31/2009 MAC must calculate the per- home Noise Mitigation Reimbursement Budget for Single - Family Homes Within the 2005 DNL 60 -64 Contours. Consent Decree § 5.3(d), pp. 24- 25. See the detailed calculation procedure in Section 5.3. MAC calculates the difference between the $7 million budgeted on 01/17/2008 and the Opt -In Homes Mitigation Cost as of 12/31/2008. Because the calculation requires use of Consumer Price Index data not available until February of each year, MAC sent a notice to the cities in December 2009 advising that the final calculation for 2010 would be the subject of a Notice to the parties in March 2010. This is the same procedure used in 2009, without objection from the cities. 02/01/2010 MAC must provide notice by regular mail to each owner of a Single- Family Home Within the 2005 DNL 60 -64 Contours that the owner may participate in the mitigation reimbursement program. Consent Decree § 5.3(g)(1), p. 27. MAC's notice must include a copy of any forms that MAC may require homeowners to file for reimbursement. MAC sent a letter to the affected homeowners in advance of February 1, 2010. 03/01/2010 MAC must prepare a noise contour using INM to reflect noise from the prior calendar year, using actual MSP operations data. Consent Decree § 8.1(d), pp. 38 -39. MAC has prepared a 2009 Noise Exposure Map. 03/01/2010 MAC must begin to reimburse Consent Decree MAC must first calculate 74 Iq 1 DATE MAC ACTION REQUIRED CONSENT DECREE PROVSION STATUS all "eligible expenses" submitted by homeowners in the Single- Family Homes Within the 2005 DNL 60 -64 Contours, as Section 5.3(e) of the Decree provides. § 5.3(e), pp. 25 -26. the Noise Mitigation Reimbursement Budget on 12/31/2009 by dividing the Total Available December 2009 Reimbursement Budget by the total number of Single - Family Homes Within the 2005 DNL 60- 64 Contours. Total reimbursement may not exceed the Noise Reimbursement Mitigation Budget. MAC must reimburse homeowners within 30 days of an application. Homeowners must submit receipts by July 31, 2014. Consent Decree § 5.3(d) -(e). MAC began processing and paying reimbursements to homeowners in advance of March 1, 2010. 07/01/2010 MAC must send a second written notice to all eligible Single- Family Homes Within the 2005 DNL 60 -64 Contours that have not applied for the full amount of the Noise Mitigation Reimbursement Budget informing owners that they may participate in the mitigation reimbursement program. Consent § 5.3(g)(2), pp. 27 -28. MAC sent a letter to affected homeowners in advance of July 1, 2010. 12/01/2010 MAC must complete the mitigation program for all Multi- Family Homes Within the 2007 DNL 60 -64 Contours (Consent Decree § 5.4). Consent Decree § 5.5(j), p. 32. MAC completed noise mitigation for Multi- family Homes within the 2007 DNL 60 -64 contours in advance of December 1, 2010. 03/01/2011 MAC must prepare a noise contour using INM to reflect noise from the prior calendar year, using actual MSP operations data. Consent Decree § 8.1(d), pp. 38 -39. 03/01/2012 MAC must prepare a noise contour using INM to reflect noise from the prior calendar Consent Decree § 8.1(d), pp. 38 -39. 75 DATE MAC ACTION REQUIRED CONSENT DECREE PROVSION STATUS year, using actual MSP operations data. 12/01/2012 MAC must complete the mitigation program for all Single- Family Homes Within the 2007 DNL 60 -62 Contours and for all DNL 60 -62 Opt -In Homes. Consent Decree § 5.5(i), p. 32. 01/01/2013 MAC must calculate the "Remaining Budget" for the mitigation reimbursement program for Single - Family Homes Within the 2005 60 -64 DNL Contours. Consent Decree § 5.3(d)(2), p. 25. See Consent Decree § 5.3(d) for the procedure, which involves calculating and adjusting the "Remaining Budget" for inflation. Not before 01/01/2013 but not later than 07/01/2013 MAC must send a third formal written notice to all eligible homes that have not applied for the full amount of the Noise Mitigation Reimbursement Budget stating that owners may participate in the mitigation reimbursement program for Single - Family Homes Within the 2005 DNL 60 -64 Contours. Consent § 5.3(g)(3), p. 28. 03/01/2013 MAC must prepare a noise contour using INM to reflect noise from the prior calendar year, using actual MSP operations data. Consent Decree § 8.1(d), pp. 38 -39. 03/01/2014 MAC must prepare a noise contour using INM to reflect noise from the prior calendar year, using actual MSP operations data. Consent Decree § 8.1(d), pp. 38 -39. 07/31/2014 Homeowners in the Single- Family Homes Within the 2005 DNL 60 -64 Contours must submit itemized receipts for noise mitigation products and installation. Consent Decree § 5.3(e), p. 25. 09/01/2014 MAC must complete the mitigation reimbursement process for all eligible expenses submitted by homeowners in the Single - Family Homes Within the 2005 DNL 60 -64 Contours (Decree § 5.3(e)). Consent Decree § 5.5(k), p. 32. 76 l 43 DATE MAC ACTION REQUIRED CONSENT DECREE PROVSION 01/01/2008 Adjust $7 million for the program under Consent Decree § 5.3. Adjustment necessary because the Consent Decree set the $7 million figure in 2007 dollars. Consent Decree § 5.3(d)(1), p. 24. 01/01/2008 For Single - Family Homes Within the 2007 DNL 60 -62 Contours, adjust the $4,000 and $14,000 mitigation budgets for mitigation products and services from the Mitigation Menu. Adjustment necessary because the Consent Decree set the figures in 2007 dollars. Consent Decree § 5.2(a)(ii), pp. 17 -18. 01/01/2009 For Single- Family Homes Within the 2007 DNL 60 -62 Contours, adjust the $4,000 and $14,000 mitigation budgets for mitigation products and services from the Mitigation Menu. Consent Decree § 5.2(a)(ii), pp. 17 -18. 01/01/2009 Adjust the "Total Available January 2009 Reimbursement Budget" (difference between $7 million and the Opt -In Home Mitigation Cost as of 12/31/2008). Consent Decree § 5.3(d)(1), pp. 24 -25. 12/31/2009 Adjust the "Total Available December 2009 Reimbursement Budget" (difference between the Total Available January 2009 Reimbursement Budget and the Opt -In Home Mitigation Cost paid during calendar year 2009). Consent Decree § 5.3(d)(1), pp. 24 -25. 01/01/2010 For Single - Family Homes Within the 2007 DNL 60 -62 Contours, adjust the $4,000 and $14,000 mitigation budgets for mitigation products and services from the Mitigation Menu. Adjustment made using the CPI. Consent Decree § 5.2(a)(ii), pp. 17 -18. • 01/01/2011 For Single - Family Homes Within the 2007 DNL 60 -62 Contours, adjust the $4,000 and $14,000 mitigation budgets for mitigation products and services from the Mitigation Menu. Consent Decree § 5.2(a)(ii), pp. 17 -18. 01/01/2011 Adjust the Noise Mitigation Reimbursement Budget. Consent Decree § 5.3(d)(3), p. 25. 01/01/2012 For Single - Family Homes Within the 2007 DNL 60 -62 Contours, adjust the $4,000 and $14,000 mitigation budgets for mitigation products and services from the Mitigation Menu. Consent Decree § 5.2(a)(ii), pp. 17 -18. 01/01/2012 Adjust the Noise Mitigation Reimbursement Budget. Consent Decree § 5.3(d)(3), p. 25. 01/01/2013 Adjust the Noise Mitigation Reimbursement Budget as provided in Consent Decree § 5.3(d)(2). Consent Decree § 5.3(d)(2), p. 25. 01/01/2014 Adjust the Noise Mitigation Reimbursement Budget. Consent Decree § 5.3(d)(3), p. 25. CITY OF MINNEAPOLIS v. MAC CONSENT DECREE INFLATION ADJUSTMENTS 2 All adjustments made using the Consumer Price Index (CPI) unless otherwise noted. l 77