Loading...
626 Wildflower Way - Zoning PermitCity of Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Rd Eagan, MN 55122 (651) 675 -5675 www.ci.eagan.mn.us Site Address: 626 Wildflower Way Lot: 38 Block: 3 Addition: Country Hollow PID: 10- 18275 -03 -380 Use: Description: Sub Type: Residential Work Type: Accessory Structure Description: 8' x 10' Playhouse Census Code: Zoning: Square Feet: 0 Comments: Fee Summary: Contractor: Total: Applicant/Permitee: Signature PERMIT Permit Type: Zoning Permit Number: EA100392 111111 , Date Issued: 08/01/2011 Ny of Ea Construction Type: Occupancy: Owner: John A Hornstein 626 Wildflower Way Eagan MN 55123 I hereby acknowledge that I have read this application and state that the 'nformation is correct and agree to comply with all applicable State of Minnesota Statutes and City of Eagan Ordinances. - Applicant - Issued By: Signature • CERTIFICATE OF FOR >�,5 ENEMY CERTwY THAT THIS SuaveY. PLAN, 011. PORT WAS PREPARED or ME OR UNDER MY �upv SUPERVISION AND ThA I AM A DULY - -REGKTiRED LAND UNDE 44 t STATE Of MNNNESOTA. MINNESOTA REGIi A ION NO. 1C0WE) tit Ij ta 9 4 o 0 "4,1 1`b ■ I v PROPOSED GRADES GARAGE SLAB= 82 TOP OF BLOCK 924. • BASEMENT FLOOR' 8167 _. Niq tubc Low cA‹ VEY KURTH SURVEYING INC. 4002 JEFFERSON STREET N.E. COLUMBIA HEIGHTS MINNESOTA 5S421 612 -768 •9760 8a-6 DATE 5 EF SCALE 1 "a .0=1R011 MONUMENT FOUND BEARINGS ARE ON AN ASSUMED DATUM •• GO 0 SPIKE SET C) a SPOT ELEVATION ) +PROPOSED ELEV. ---)■ DRAINAGE ARROW .vim. E ING DEPT o LOT 3 , 3 L.cac �r, , Cut.cr C LaL.1. a -Kom C.0. Ai . P.R.V. REQUIRED *City ofban 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan MN 55122 Phone: (651) 675 -5685 Email: planningacityofeagan.com 2011 ZONING PERMIT APPLICATION Please submit a set of scaled drawings with the application. For Office Use /'�� Permit #: 16 Q39 Date Received: J �l Date of Approval: g' / ' / Staff: Revised Plans Approved: Yes / No Date of Approval: Staff: Approved: Yes / No Date of Approval: Required Corrections: Staff: Revised Plans Approved: Yes / No Date of Approval: Staff: G:\Building Inspections \PERMIT APPLICATIONS\2011\.2011 Permit Applications Site Address: 6 Gi);( I< , CQNTACT'� k Name: •` � C ` ►�s�c � Phone: ./t1/ X5 g 7/6? Address: [[ t, f i d. City/State/Zip: / / 552 Applicant Signature: ?� E. C ` ❑ Retaining Wall <4 feet ❑ Patio ❑ Sidewalk Description of work: ❑ Driveway 0 Sport Court ❑ Fence 4:tt' ft vJ l tI 510ther: / V � r(© Y it-5 € ' U.k Se r \ ., l *City ofban 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan MN 55122 Phone: (651) 675 -5685 Email: planningacityofeagan.com 2011 ZONING PERMIT APPLICATION Please submit a set of scaled drawings with the application. For Office Use /'�� Permit #: 16 Q39 Date Received: J �l Date of Approval: g' / ' / Staff: Revised Plans Approved: Yes / No Date of Approval: Staff: Approved: Yes / No Date of Approval: Required Corrections: Staff: Revised Plans Approved: Yes / No Date of Approval: Staff: G:\Building Inspections \PERMIT APPLICATIONS\2011\.2011 Permit Applications y a "`n •, ‘., r For Office Use EAGAN ••__ __•, Permit#: / 7 e e Date Received: 3830 PILOT KNOB ROAD 1 EAGAN, MN 55122-1810 (651)675-56851 TDD:(651)454-85351 FAX:(651)875-5694 Staff: planning n►citvofeagan.com L. 2019 ZONING PERMIT APPLICATION • p Please identify improvements on a scaled site plan drawing that shows lot lines,structures and existing conditions. PropertySite Address: LP G L V�+ I AO V v c�s"._ VJ information , Owner Name: 1.4.1\\ M'JI)A g...1\1 5-T---- --k Name: AVIANDA 1-4� Si Cwt J Phone: tt 51 t gi t .V 14 Address: (. PW /2�-W CiCity/State/Zip: c1-5-1j 2- Contact _.W.I_ Applicant Signature: [40$4/1" --- Date: V 124 1 l Email address: AC HD ETh 1 , t v 0 Retaining Wall<4 feet 0 Driveway Or. ) & —.. the ,& . Sport Court h0 r Troy c li €p To j ie. f i e 'r'e Ar'71) Type of Work 0 Sidewalk 0 Fence 1...t'Sj 77r'rii r 'Soil F R Description of work Y Ia et,e4644AA Uf 01 d IQi'iteh IA o Planning Setbacks,hard surface coverage,shoreland zoning,bluff zone/setbacks,etc. Approved/ ' med Date: 7 /3 ` 11 Staff: k /24fu.lc _Lo Q�-kms 4e � /44- b_ . Revised Plans Approved: Yes/No Date: Staff. Engineering Grading,drainage,utility easements,wetlands,erosion control,improvements in the Ri -p, , tc. Approved/Domed Date: Staff The own®r/apIr- jCant is Notes: responoterfoteompance with applicable construction codes. Revised Plans Approved: Yes/No Date: Staff Comments CALL BEFORE YOU DIG. Call Gopher State One Call at(661)464-0002 for protection against underground utility damage. Call 48 hours before you intend to dig to receive locates of underground utilities. www.00pherstateonecal[.org You may subscribe to receive an electronic notification from the City of proposed ordinances by signing up for an email update on the City's website at www.cityofeaaan..comfsubscribe. ---3 . / (P. Cul )Maaa--It (- ______,_______--.--- / --7 -.e,.' _ . CERTIFICATE OF VEY. FOR .,.`.',-- 0.4, St:.,`�- KURTH SURVEYING INC. 1rIERFtt t CEtATtrY THAT THIS SURVEY,PLAN,ON 001IT w►s PIRPARED 4002 JEFFERSON STREET N.E. IT Int OR UMOCR NT. CT$UPERV 5061 AMD t AM A DULY COLUMBIA HEIGHTS MINNESOTA 55421 ~----REat$T LAMO•11"b U ! T LTAT[OF MINNESOTA. ea-TIM-9?iI DATE `i ` (se' • ,A-----'' PROPOSED SCALE I"• ' - MINNESOTA REGI A ION NO.1Cp k13 .0=MOM MONUMENT FOUND GRADES BEARINGS ARE ON AN ASSUMED DATUM GARAGE SLAB= 82-4-C. B'a0 o SPIKE SET I:Pk SPOT ELEVATION TOP OF BLOCK* 824.3 ( )s PROPOSED ELEV. N / BASEMENT FLOORr aI4J,3 —3 r DRAINAGE ARROW .- i 6g, .6 . . er% re22 .a \kJ AN i • ..° $ Co k>?) ta•° fy c' 'Q .',1,-:;). 7 \ 95, 0 '(..‘&.,"-`e26• a . `; / C>,‘i, ." . . rI' JZl -0 6? IA ` �ko -< y _ ` 0 �� 'r. 11 • / — / /7 S 1.. N , 14:3.111,-01 7 tfl r I 15 411 / - : 0 1 4- P 1.1‘R ft \/ E lit 1 Dat i.. dc,--- fa ` EAGFN : ►' r i E ING DEPT At tkIP o ,., I in u, o - 3/ 1 0 8 - I�L�► 405 to L— fitio-sr t'b." LC, aa, -ez.LoGIr�., C_,D�t•l-RN( Ro w, -Ko-Ta Co.j14t.b t• PS"' - --1-1-0...:G.....-; ii.;�a I 1 , 4, 1.-( 'I,( , / r--1 .--5 CERTIFICATE OF `r'VEY -_ FOR `-_-.G�.4ARL.5.`? ACit-AG. KURTH SURVEYING INC. I++EREiT cumin T'MAT TNtt Sutliff;PLAN, WAS PK WED 4002 JEFFERSON STREET N.E. AT ME OR Ues� NOEP MY CT SUPERVON ANO THAT I AM A CRAY COLUMBIA HEIGHTS MINNESOTA 55421 ----RtG1iT{REO AMO umOL i4FT STAR OF MtM,CSOTA. 612-TIMI-Ana DATE 91(4, (e ..-% M, ' PROPOSED scAL� I .�-�-, MINNESOTA1REGii3 -A ION NO.\:x.11 3 O.IRON MONUMENT FOUND GRADES • BEARINGS ARE ON AN ASSUMED DATUM GARAGE SLAB• 2.4 O.60 0 SPIKE SET I_)•SPOT ELEVATION TOP OF BLOCK. 8 ( )•PROPOSED ELEV. /_1 BASEMENT FLOOR. 1(Q'3 ,._+■DRAINAGE ARROW A '-.' i., ...1 y 6?..6 1 gm()a \ki 01/4‘s"( I ID a'° ~, 0.• ...--*# / •9 , 0 •-,1,-1.-',3_%" <:;,, '"::S-r---::'-: .. n oa I' roCI) --I§ '~U .�� ,.,...0,,f,-;„ / C?,,k o /.. --'tx!".',' .1 . . ... / 4,1,' s R A (ex--,1)1) /,.t tip:o kct i& I0 ko o �4:, ,�' (d ,1, d ° f tit ate ) .y • T '9 1 7 1' ="' 111 _j i f 1 / 0 A P AZ' f E 1 1 D;:'a � o tel`" cr fn , EAGAN 1.E ING DEPT ,r, •' ... o 5 o9 • - ' _ ` �%p ` to V S t � (e.- .... ...„ c4 1 , Lo-- 38, �.UL ce-v,�, Cput•LI R (' LLL V4, -`�0ThCo.}�`)l• V• REQUIRED s I ,10,E I A % LI z cp ....„........,z),. ,,....c .... . lik.0 . 1 g- .,, t.,3 ... . / / r7 ._..... a ,. 1 A \I ct-ai I -4k --r) cd.2.6i,(4(2, % NI-A- 4 1 iiLt 4t....i!N 47 T-‘15" Q- > 4 '.. ". c--k, .? 3 , # .* ,..,, ._, Z.-:" - - (--s. n, fg _.8. ,` ' n f., ---9 41- --14- , _ . ,c 1. 1-9 -..- Pe--es ' ,6 -f , is. P-- 1- -i- yJ .�s,N F i , j� ''. Z ki- -- 4 - --_, g ..A) 4 q x .--c2:. --= ) ..d_ --.:a -.. C. ot) , f., g. . _1c . t5 :`"). �' _ Y'I „ ( "- � �� tcis i 1 -.9 -0 q -- . iii, - 1 a 4 v , i e s ,,, g ....... ?./tow ,- 0 -;,\ ,_,.... ct5 ..< (...t,... .iir iv i5V — vi _c- , ,4 30/1P 1 ic4 A ' 1 ! 1 ,j, . . 14.__ —. --- 51e — 4I o ,7, -) ; ,..s i ---1-c., , kr\ 1 6 i � a iic *--a--. ,„c..0 $ ii rx_i 71 Vr'ec-)-1 0O.'W. ci, --.0 __O - , ,,9 QJ 1 /'re? iv.. - I qlio , • -t(.4t' .-42- -0 CoI- A g_ .._, .... 0) 0 5i.,,. .....__,,, ,.a _ -.;<-- ct -x;.-: ,is.CIS 1 ii t —-- ._ j.;)‘- .__,.____ P - ‘s CL O►. — c-- 11‘ )2- -sV ./ 1 2 m I' ) .s' 1:---' 1 Vo ..0 4 , --ttn dm ._. ', 4 949 urniligo ! 4._ 3 1 4' , ,- N .,_ -, _,.0 4 1 110:5 __id i (3 1 1.________ 4.. t % -Lik bk.ot 1 1 A I , Iv -„ 4 ----' i 0 I i › › ! 1 4 KS eCk-No -.6. i ,,,..4 -11:744 27 -4 1- 'fl.--st t4 ‘d .:2 h i ',. ., ..44 --1-,, P-- a' -II 1--i i Z kk ✓, NS A ) _si 1 --°' --9- --t..— a ic; 1 t - T 1 1 Z ,4 rs �- (i, -= to A .- t x --ic 1 I )7 X \:Q 4 -I 0: „Is 'W <:, lit- ---?-• ---1-10 ei .-. T i c.,_ --.,.. -. .til i t4s L`- . . .-:-.% T .%,. ...1. _II ' :?5 tic__ 5,...e ..........._4.1 i •-Vt , i t- ...) g- ""It 4'4: 7 ' t) , 249 VA 4-__T , '41P 1 _o V ... 7%9 t it PA a gil i' C IV '. rIP il". (.4 .4.0 _.9 .7e6 SL Et- 49<" � 1-- cry - --1- 1!, _ I CIS t t k' i4 i ct-i Ch . t -4V t id. I as..----Z- \ i :s 1 1--- W-) 1 VO 4 _... ! 4 4.I 9v ii,...k. 1 f 1 r� iA *,-, '''- •t1 _101 v `` ESICC Most Widely Accepted and Trusted EVALUATION SERVICE lnGxpev�rnn,'f rr�� Innovation u RESEARCHvaLABS ICC-ES Evaluation Report ESR-1895 ICC-ES I (800) 423-6587 I (562) 699-0543 I www.icc-es.org Reissued 12/2018 This report is subject to renewal 12/2019. DIVISION: 3100 00—EARTHWORK SECTION: 31 60 00—SPECIAL FOUNDATIONS AND LOAD-BEARING ELEMENTS REPORT HOLDER: PIN FOUNDATIONS, INC. EVALUATION SUBJECT: DIAMOND PIER° DP-50 & DP-75 FOR BEARING PIN PIERS ICC ICC ICC cS PMG LISTED 2014 Recipient ofPrestigious Western States Seismic PolicyCouncil Malt P 9 INTERNATIONAL (WSSPC)Award in Excellence" A Subsidiary of CODE COUNCIC ICC-ES Evaluation Reports are not to be construed as representing aesthetics or any other attributes not specifically addressed, nor are they to be construed as an endorsement of the subject of the report or a recommendation for its use. ANSI There is no warranty by ICC Evaluation Service, LLC, express or implied, as to any finding or other matter in this ACCREDITED ISO/IEC 17065 ,, report, or as to any product covered by the report. Product C., 1;0„Body 11000 Copyright© 2018 ICC Evaluation Service, LLC. All rights reserved. ICC ESEVALUATION SERVICE Most Widely Accepted and Trusted ICC-ES Evaluation Report ESR-1895 Reissued December 2018 This report is subject to renewal December 2019. www.icc-es.orq I (800) 423-6587 I (562) 699-0543 A Subsidiary of the International Code Council® DIVISION: 31 00 00-EARTHWORK 3.2.2 Precast Galvanized Steel Anchor Bolt: The Section: 31 60 00-Special Foundations and Load- galvanized steel anchor bolt that is precast into the center Bearing Elements of the top of the DP-50 concrete head measures a minimum /2 inch (12.7 mm) in diameter and complies with REPORT HOLDER: ASTM A307 as Grade A. The galvanized steel anchor bolt that is precast into the center of the top of the DP-75 PIN FOUNDATIONS, INC. concrete head measures a minimum 5/8 inch (15.9 mm) in diameter and complies with ASTM A307 as Grade A. EVALUATION SUBJECT: 3.2.3 Steel Bearing Pins: The four steel bearing pins DIAMOND PIER® DP-50 & DP-75 FOR BEARING PIN supplied with each pier are made of Type E, Grade A PIERS (electric-resistance-welded), Schedule 40, galvanized steel pipe complying with ASTM A53. For the DP-50, pins have 1.0 EVALUATION SCOPE a nominal 1-inch diameter [1.315-inch (33.4 mm) outside diameter; 0.133-inch nominal wall thickness]; and have Compliance with the following codes: a minimum nominal length of 36 inches (914 mm) or 2015, 2012, 2009 and 2006 International Residential 50 inches (1270 mm). For the DP-75 the pins have a Code®(IRC) nominal 1-1/4 inch diameter [1.66-inch (42.2 mm) outside diameter with a 0.140 nominal wall thickness]; and have a Property evaluated: minimum nominal length of 50 inches. Structural 4.0 DESIGN AND INSTALLATION 2.0 USES 4.1 Design: The Diamond Pier DP-50 and DP-75 bearing pin piers When installed in accordance with this report in minimum are used as foundations for the support of gravity loads allowable 1500 psf (71.8 kPa) soils per IRC Table for exterior decks, including covered decks, elevated R401.4.1, the DP-50 bearing pin pier with 36 inch walkways, stairway construction and accessory structures (915 mm) pins provides a 1.8 square foot (0.17 m2) as defined in the IRC. The bearing pin piers are permitted bearing area for supporting gravity loads; the DP-50 for use in any of the weathering classifications defined in bearing pin pier with 50 inch (1270 mm) pins provides a IRC Figure R301.2(3). 2.4 square foot (0.23 m2) bearing area for supporting 3.0 DESCRIPTION gravity loads; and the DP-75 bearing pin pier with 50 inch (1270 mm) pins provides a 2.8 square foot (0.26 m2) 3.1 General: bearing area for supporting gravity loads. The bearing pin piers consist of a factory-fabricated, pre- When installed in accordance with this report in cast, diamond-shaped concrete head that has a galvanized minimum allowable 2000 psf (95.8 kPa) soils per IRC steel anchor bolt precast into the center of the top of the Table R401.4.1, the DP-50 bearing pin pier with 36-inch head; and galvanized steel bearing pins which are jobsite- (915 mm) pins provides a 1.8-square-foot (0.17 m2) installed through holes precast in the head, and driven into bearing area for supporting gravity loads; the DP-50 the underlying soil. See Figure 1. bearing pin pier with 50-inch (1270 mm) pins provides a 3.2 Materials: 2.2-square-foot (0.20 m2) bearing area for supporting gravity loads; and the DP-75 bearing pin pier with 50-inch 3.2.1 Concrete Head: The DP-50 concrete head (1270 mm) pins provides a 3.2-square-foot (0.30 m2) measures 10 inches (254 mm) by 10 inches (254 mm) by bearing area for supporting gravity loads. 11 inches (279 mm) tall, weighs approximately 50 pounds (22.7 kg), and is formed from air-entrained, normal-weight 4.2 Installation: concrete. The DP-75 concrete head measures 11 inches The site soil is prepared by digging a hole with a conical (279 mm) by 11 inches (279 mm) by 12 inches (305 mm) shape, approximately the shape of the base of the tall, weighs approximately 75 pounds (34.0 kg), and is concrete headand slightly deeper than the pier itself, formed from air-entrained, normal-weight concrete. The leaving loose soils directly below the head. The head is air-entrained concrete has a minimum compressive positioned in the hole to its midpoint, and braced as strength of 5500 psi (37.9 MPa) at 28 days, and a total air needed to plumb. The bearing pins must then be slid content (percent by volume of concrete) of not less than through the holes in the concrete head, and driven into the 5 percent nor more than 7 percent, in accordance with IRC soil as recommended in the Pin Foundations published Section R402.2. installation instructions, leaving 3/4 inch (19.1 mm) of the ICC-ES Evaluation Reports are not to be construed as representing aesthetics or any other attributes not specifically addressed,nor are they to be construed -- C.ANSI as an endorsement of the subject of the report or a recommendation for its use.There is no warranty by ICC Evaluation Service,LLC,express or implied,as to any finding or other matter in this report,or as 10 any product covered by the report. CODE ca Copyright©2018 ICC Evaluation Service,LLC. All rights reserved. Page 1 of 2 • ESR-1895 I Most Widely Accepted and Trusted Page 2 of 2 pin protruding from the upper surface of the pier. Once the 5.5 The bearing capacity of the site soil must be dead loads have been applied to the pier, the length of the determined in accordance with IRC Table R401.4.1. If protruding bearing pin must be verified and adjusted as presumptive soil capacity cannot be assumed in necessary to 3/4 inch (19.1 mm). The exposed end of the accordance with the IRC Table R401.4.1, the code bearing pins must then be capped and sealed as official may request a soils report. recommended in the Pin Foundations published installation 5.6 The capacity of the bearing pin piers to resist lateral instructions. The minimum spacing of the installed bearing and/or uplift loads was not evaluated for this report. pin piers is 3 feet(0.91 m)on center. 5.0 CONDITIONS OF USE 5.7 Use of the bearing pin piers where soil constituents, changing water levels or other factors indicate The Diamond Pier DP-50 and DP-75 bearing pin piers possible deleterious effects on the pier foundation described in this report comply with, or are suitable assembly, is beyond the scope of this report. alternatives to what is specified in the code indicated in Section 1.0 of this report, subject to the following 5.8 Use of the bearing pin piers is limited to structures conditions: regulated by the IRC. 5.1 The bearing pin piers must be installed in accordance 6.0 EVIDENCE SUBMITTED with the Pin Foundations, Inc. published installation Data in accordance with the ICC-ES Acceptance Criteria instructions, the IRC and this report. In the event of a for Bearing Pin Piers(AC336),dated June 2016. conflict between this report and the Pin Foundations, Inc. published installation instructions, this report 7.0 IDENTIFICATION governs. 7.1 Each pallet of Diamond Pier DP-50 and DP-75 5.2 Wood in contact with the concrete head and precast precast concrete heads is labeled with the Pin galvanized steel bolt must be protected against decay Foundations, Inc., name and address; the product and subterranean termites in accordance with 2015, name (Diamond Pier DP-50, or Diamond Pier DP-75); 2012 and 2009 IRC Sections R317 and R318, the evaluation report number (ESR-1895); the and 2006 IRC Sections R319 and R320, as manufacturing date and lot number; and the phrase, applicable. Compatibility of the concrete head and "For Use with One- and Two-Family Dwelling precast galvanized steel bolt with wood treatments Construction Only." not described in 2015, 2012 and 2009 IRC Sections Each bundle of bearing pins is labeled with the Pin R317 and R318; and 2006 IRC Sections R319 and R320, as applicable must be established based on a Foundations, Inc., name and address; the product current ICC-ES evaluation report on the wood name(Diamond Pier DP-50, or Diamond Pier DP-75); treatment. the evaluation report number (ESR-1895); and the phrase, "For Use with One- and Two-Family Dwelling 5.3 In areas requiring frost protection, exterior decks on Construction Only." bearing pin piers as described in Section 2.0 may be connected to and supported by a dwelling when 7.2 The report holder's contact information is the approved by the code official. See IRC Section following: R403.1.4.1, Exception 3, as applicable. PIN FOUNDATIONS,INC. 5.4 Frost protection for accessory structures defined by 4810 PT.FOSDICK DRIVE NW the IRC is beyond the scope of this report, except PMB 60 free-standing accessory structures constructed in GIG HARBOR,WASHINGTON 98335 accordance with IRC Section R403.1.4.1, Exceptions (253)858-8809 1 or 2,where frost protection is not required. www.pinfoundations.com rTi # 44. . 40 \ . / / . d' \' \/4/ 11, a .\/\�Y . /V ,4/A\•\ 4/ Y-1 \I `ti/ FIGURE 1—DIAMOND PIER DP-50 and DP-75 , • a DlaMOndPiero FOUNDATION SYSTEM Code Compliance Information for Diamond Pier® Foundations in the State of Minnesota This document was revised in January 2018. Codes are constantly changing, however, so please check with your local building code official for any amendments or revisions that may apply. Pin Foundations, Inc. Gig Harbor, Washington Toll Free: 866-255-9478 / Main Office: 253-858-8809 www.pinfoundations.com or www.diamondpiers.com ©2018 by Pin Foundations, Inc. All rights reserved. D000004/01.2018 Diamond Pier® Foundation Systems are covered by U.S. Patents 5,039,256; 6,910,832; 7,326,003; and patents pending. Diamond Pier®is a U.S. registered trademark of Pin Foundations, Inc. The latest version of this document is available on our website, www.diamondpiers.com, or by calling us at 866-255-9478 (Toll Free) or 253-858-8809 (Main Office). Other documents and publications referenced in this document and listed below are also available on the website. "Diamond Pier DP-50 & DP-75 for Bearing Pin Piers," ICC-ES Evaluation Report No. ESR-1895, 2017. "Diamond Pier National Performance Submittals," 2005. "Diamond Pier Frost Performance Report, Zone II, Minnesota Soils," 2010. "Diamond Pier Frost Performance Review," Nebraska Engineer's Review, Certified letter from Paul C. Gilham, P.E., Western Wood Structures, Inc., January 29, 2013. "Diamond Pier Observational Evidence," Forest Lake, Minnesota, May 2011. "Diamond Pier Installation Manual," 2018. Detail drawings of Diamond Pier foundations, on Details page on website. 2 Minnesota Code Compliance Information for Diamond Pier°Foundations Code Compliance Information for Diamond Pier° Foundations in the State of Minnesota Introduction The information in this document is intended to assist homeowners and builders in obtaining code approval to use Diamond Pier foundations for projects in the state of Minnesota. The Diamond Pier foundation system has proven to demonstrate performance equal to or better than traditional systems even in areas with frost heave, and it is compliant with the International Residential Code (IRC) and the 2015 Minnesota Residential Code (MRC) when properly installed. The procedure and submittal instructions below detail what to provide with your permit application to establish that the intent of the code is fully met with the use of Diamond Pier foundations for the specific project as described in the application. Always striving to go "Beyond the Standard", Pin Foundations, Inc. (PFI) is dedicated to excellence in the design, testing, and performance of the Diamond Pier product. PFI manufactures the highest quality products and maintains rigorous quality control procedures and standards. PFI invests in the highest standards of code compliance documentation, providing testing certifications through the ICC-ES evaluation services program with our published ESR-1895 code compliance document. With over 30 years of experience, PFI has a solid history of field performance in a wide range of low-impact foundation systems used in the most innovative building applications. Our innovation and dedication to quality allows you, the builder, to build with confidence and know that your project rests on a solid foundation. Procedure The procedure when seeking code approval for any project involves the submittal of a code-compliant design to the local building code official, along with the building permit application. The project then goes through a plan review process. If the building official finds the project meets the intent of the code, then the project will be approved and the building permit issued. This is true regardless of how common a design might be; even a traditional concrete pier footing typically accepted by a code official for use in frost zones, as prescribed in R403.1.4.1 of the MRC, must be reviewed to ensure that site-specific conditions and the application meet the intent of the code. There may be cases where the prescriptive code is not satisfactory and additional means and measures are required. There is no product, design, or method of construction that is approved until a building official stamps the project as approved. For Diamond Pier foundations, the procedure is to submit the Diamond Pier product as an alternate method with the application for the building permit. This is accomplished by attaching a detail of the Diamond Pier product in the project drawings, along with the layout and spacing of the piers in accordance with the "Residential Diamond Pier Load Chart." Also, it is important to include copies of ICC-ES evaluation report ESR-1895 and, if requested, frost performance documents, which are available on the manufacturer's website, www.diamondpiers.com. Submittal Each project submittal using the Diamond Pier foundations must be reviewed by the local building code official to ensure that site-specific conditions and product applications meet the requirements of the PFI installation manual, the Residential Load Chart, and ESR-1895. Note that section 5.1 of ESR-1895 states, in part, that the Diamond Pier foundations must be installed in accordance with the PFI published installation instructions, the IRC, and ESR-1895. During the review process, the building official considers the scope of the project, the project structure, soils information, and site conditions to ensure that the Diamond Pier product is being installed in accordance with its published capacities and that the published capacities and evidence of system performance submitted comply with the intent of the 2015 MRC. Minnesota Code Compliance Information for Diamond Pier®Foundations 3 Once the building official determines that the proposed project is satisfactory and complies with the intent of the code, the use of the Diamond Pier product shall be approved. Code Compliance Information The Diamond Pier foundation system is IRC code compliant, and it also complies with the 2015 MRC, as amended, when used in accordance with ESR-1895 and PFI's published Diamond Pier Installation Manual. The path to approval is via Part 1300.0110, Subpart 13: Alternative materials, design, and methods of construction and equipment, in the 2015 MRC: 1300.0110 DUTIES AND POWERS OF BUILDING OFFICIAL. Subpart 1. General. The building official is authorized and directed to enforce the provisions of this code. The building official has the authority to render interpretations of the code and adopt policies and procedures in order to clarify the application of the provisions. The interpretations, policies, and procedures shall comply with the intent and purpose of the code. The policies and procedures shall not have the effect of waiving requirements specifically provided for in the code. Subpart 13. Alternative materials, design, and methods of construction and equipment. The code is not intended to prevent the installation of any material or to prohibit any design or method of construction not specifically prescribed by the code, provided that any alternative has been approved. An alternative material, design, or method of construction shall be approved where the building official finds that the proposed design is satisfactory and complies with the intent of the code, and that the material, method, or work offered is, for the purpose intended, at least the equivalent of that prescribed in the code in quality, strength, effectiveness, fire resistance, durability, and safety. The details of any action granting approval of an alternate shall be recorded and entered in the files of the Department of Building Safety. The prescriptive code governing traditional concrete pier footing depth for frost protection is described in R403.1.4.1 of the MRC and Part sow* mom 1303.1600 in the Minnesota Administrative Rules, which describes the frost depth as 5 feet !ISA � 9 �llltdlF in Zone I and 3-1/2 feet in Zone II (as shown in0°*°- Figure 1). The intent of Part 1303.1600 is to ensure that ° ' concrete pier footings provide adequate cu. wow, protection of the structure from the negative 0.0 "'"'" gm effects of frost heave. Frost heave occurs when A.M.°t*... the frost heave force exceeds the uplift capacity nespe„,s,„ "'6 . Zone I(Above Lin,) of the foundation system. II� Frost Depth s 5 feet �MONO�. Zone F!(below Line) • The Model DP-50 Diamond Pier founda- N - 1 ,t .7;03 "" Frost Depth-3-1/2 test tion with 50" pins meets this intent in "°"1 ,, Zone II by providing an equivalent or better 'aig ' ' a »w esaa.�u uplift resistance when compared to a 42" "`°`"` .��.Oketaak deep traditional concrete pier footing. -ati* .01 • The Model DP-75 Diamond Pier founda- tion with 63" pins meets this intent in Zone I by providing an equivalent or better uplift resistance when compared to a 60" Figure 1. Frost Depth in Minnesota Counties per deep traditional concrete pier footing. Part 1303.1600, Subpart 1. Minimum Footing Depth. 4 Minnesota Code Compliance Information for Diamond Pier®Foundations Submittal Evidence The Diamond Pier DP-50 and DP-75 foundations have proven to provide sufficient bearing capacity in Minnesota. The testing and performance evidence shows that the Diamond Pier product provides adequate bearing, lateral, and uplift support for the life of the project when used in accordance with the Diamond Pier published capacities as defined in the"Residential Diamond Pier Load Chart." Residential Diamond Pier Load Chart !AS-Accredited Third-Party Bearing, Uplift, and Lateral Field Tests2 Minimum 1500 psf Silts/Clays (CL,ML,MH,CH)3 Model/ Pin Bearing Load o Equivalent O Cylinder Frost Uplift Load Lateral Load No. Length Capacity Base Area Comparison Zone Capacity Capacity DP-50136" 2700# 1.8 sf 18"dia 24" 600# 600# DP-50142" "3000# 2.0 sf 19"dia 36" *900# *600# DP-50150" 3300# 2.2 sf 20"dia 48" 1200# 600# DP-75/50" *3750# 2.5 sf 21"dia 48" * 1400# *600# DP-75163" 4200# 2.8 sf 22"dia 60" 1600# 600# Equivalency to Traditional Concrete Footings Minimum 2000 psf Sands/Gravels (SW,SP,SM,SC,GM,GC)3 Model/ Pin Bearing Load i Equivalent o Cylinder Frost Uplift Load Lateral Load No. Length Capacity Base Area Comparison Zone Capacity Capacity DP-50/36" 3600# 1.8 sf 18"dia 24" 600# 600# DP-50/42" *4000# 2.0 sf 19"dia 36" *900# *600# DP-50/50" 4400# 2.2 sf 20"dia 48" 1200# 600# DP-75/50" *5600# 2.8 sf 22"dia 48" * 1400# *600# DP-75/63" 6400# 3.2 sf 24"dia 60" 1600# 600# Equivalency to Traditional Concrete Footings *Interpolated from field test values. Notes: 1. This load chart is intended for simple structures supported by columns, posts, and beams loaded up to, but not exceeding,the stated capacities. It is not intended for structures with asymmetrical, rotational, overturning, or dynamic forces. Intended uses are described in section 2.0 of ICC-ES prescriptive bearing evaluation report ESR-1895. For projects that exceed the capacities or limitations defined herein, or the intended uses described in ESR-1895, contact PFI for additional information or site-specific capacity evaluation. See also the Use and Applications download at www.diamondpiers.com. 2. Capacities shown are tested to a Factor of Safety of 2, and are applicable in properly drained, normal sound soils only,with minimum soil bearing capacities as indicated. Copies of the field test reports are available from PFI upon request. 3. See IRC Table R401.4.1, "Presumptive Load-Bearing Values of Foundation Materials,"for a full description of applicable 1500 psf and 2000 psf soil types. For soils below 1500 psf, or soils with unknown characteristics, additional site and design analysis is required. For soils above 2000 psf,the values in this chart shall apply. 4. All capacities use four pins of the specified length per foundation. Pin length includes that portion of the pin embedded within the concrete head. See"Check Your Layout" in the Diamond Pier Installation Manual for more information on pin/pier layout and spacing restrictions. 5. For professional engineers designing for short-term transient loads, contact PFI for further information. Minnesota Code Compliance Information for Diamond Pier®Foundations 5 Load Bearing Testing IAS-Accredited Diamond Pier Compression Field Load Test Report, EEI Report No. 07-020-10, published October 5, 2016; submitted to the ICC-ES evaluation services for review and publication in December 2016. The published ESR-1895, reissued December 2016, paragraph 4.1, provides evidence of bearing capacity using Diamond Pier foundations as equivalent to the published load capacity chart provided on page 5 per 2015 IRC Table R401.4.1. The Diamond Pier DP-50 with 50" pins provides 3300 lb of bearing capacity in 1500 psf minimum soils per 2015 IRC Table R401.4.1. The Diamond Pier DP-75 with 63" pins provides 4200 lb of bearing capacity in 1500 psf minimum soils. A copy of this test report is available upon request. Uplift and Lateral Load Testing IAS-Accredited Diamond Pier Uplift and Lateral Load Field Test Report, EEI Report No. 07-020-11, published January 2017. The IAS-Accredited Diamond Pier Uplift and Lateral Load Field Test provides evidence of equivalent or better uplift loads when compared to a traditional concrete foundation assembly. The Diamond Pier DP-50 with 50" pins provides 1200 lb of uplift resistance in 1500 psf minimum soils per 2015 IRC Table R401.4.1. The Diamond Pier DP-75 with 63" pins provides 1600 lb of uplift resistance in 1500 psf minimum soils. Uplift Comparison The Diamond Pier DP-50/50" provides 1200 lb of uplift load capacity per IAS-accredited third-party testing. • A 12" diameter x 48" deep concrete cylinder footing provides an uplift resistance of 465 lb (dead load calculation). • The Diamond Pier DP-50 foundation with 50" pins provides an uplift resistance of 1200 lb. • The Diamond Pier DP-75 foundations with 63" pins provide an uplift resistance of 1600 lb. Field Performance PFI also provides evidence of equivalency for frost heave resistance by providing equal or better uplift resistance and over 20 years of independently documented field performance. These documents are available on PFI's website. • 2005 National Performance Affidavits: A series of testimonials and engineers' opinion letters attesting to the performance of the system in a wide variety of climates and conditions. • 2010 Frost Performance Report: A Minnesota engineer's certified report of a series of monitored local deck installations, including a review from Colorado Code Consulting. Colorado Code Consulting provides educational seminars for building and residential code, including specific courses addressing the review of alternate building products. Colorado Code Consulting states: "In accordance with the Minnesota Building Code (MBC) Minnesota Rules Section 1300.0110, Subpart 13 Alternate Methods, it is my professional opinion that this report demonstrates that Diamond Pier DP-50 foundations have been proven to protect attached, permanent secondary structures (such as decks and stairs)from frost heave. Therefore, the piers comply with the intent of the Minnesota Code Section 1309.0403 and its amended IRC section R403.1.4.1 for footing frost protection. The intent of these provisions is to ensure footings and the permanent structures they support to be protected from the negative effects of frost heave. Diamond Pier foundation's track record proves that it provides for the IRC's full frost protection intent." Tom Meyers, Colorado Code Consulting • 2013 Nebraska State Engineer's Letter: Review and evaluation of 2010 Frost Performance Report by a professional structural engineer for the state of Nebraska. "I have reviewed the DP-50 Diamond Pier Frost Performance Report, consisting of the preface, a letter from Thomas Meyers, CBO and a report by Steven A Schmidt, PE. Additionally, 1 have reviewed ICC-ES Evaluation Report, ESR-1895. These documents adequately certify that the DP-50 Diamond Piers perform acceptably for detached or attached deck structures subjected to frost heave conditions." Paul C. Gilham, P.E.S.E. • 2011 Observational Report: A direct side-by-side comparison of the Diamond Pier foundation system to a conventional concrete footing in Forest Lake Minnesota. Additional Documentation AC336, ICC-ES Acceptance Criteria for Precast Concrete Pier Foundation Assemblies. Conclusion The evidence submitted and described in this document clearly demonstrates equal or better performance of Diamond Pier foundations as specified in Chapter 4 of the 2015 Minnesota Residential Code, per Part 1300.0110, Subpart 13, Alternative materials, design, and methods of construction and equipment. Over 50,000 Diamond Pier foundations have been installed in a random mix of mild, moderate, and severe frost heave susceptible soils, as defined by the USDA web soils survey, and have exhibited excellent field performance. Upon request, PFI can supply information for dozens of sites and subdevelopments where traditional concrete piers accepted by Minnesota State Code have failed to adequately resist frost heave. Diamond Pier systems provided as an alternative have resisted frost heave at these sites since 2007. PFI does not advocate a blanket approval of the Diamond Pier product by any building code official. PFI is dependent on the review process to ensure that the Diamond Pier product is used in accordance with the application for which it is intended—in normal construction conditions—and within the limits of the system. This process protects the homeowner, the builder, and PFI as the manufacturer. The Diamond Pier product should not be used until the local code official approves its use as submitted in the permit application. Conversely, PFI does not agree with a blanket denial of the Diamond Pier product by any building code official without proper project-specific review. A proper project-specific review defines for the builder or applicant any special conditions that may exist, and provides an explanation of whether the intent of the code has or has not been met. In the event that the code official denies the use of the Diamond Pier product as an alternate method, the building code official shall document the reason for the denial per Part 1300.0120, Subpart 8, and provide a written copy to the permit applicant. The building code official may deny the use of the Diamond Pier system if the intent of the code has not been met or if the project is not installed in accordance with the instructions in PFI's Diamond Pier Installation Manual or in accordance with ESR-1895, but in all cases, a proper project review must be done without prejudice. Minnesota Code Compliance Information for Diamond Pier®Foundations 7 DiamondPier FOUNDATION SYSTEM Pin Foundations, Inc. Gig Harbor, Washington Toll Free: 866-255-9478 / Main Office: 253-858-8809 www.pinfoundations.com or www.diamondpiers.com ©2018 by Pin Foundations, Inc.All rights reserved. D000004/01.2018 DiamondPier® FOUNDATION SYSTEM RESIDENTIAL DIAMOND PIER LOAD CHART IAS-Accredited Third-Party Bearing, Uplift, and Lateral Field Tests2 Minimum 1500 psf Silts/Clays (CL,ML, MH,CH)3 Model/ Pin Bearing Load Equivalent Cylinder Frost Uplift Load Lateral Load No. Length Capacity " Base Area Comparison Zone Capacity Capacity DP-50136" 2700# 1.8 sf 18"dia 24" 600# 600# DP-50/42" *3000# 2.0 sf 19"dia 36" *900# *600# DP-50/50" 3300# 2.2 sf 20"dia 48" 1200# 600# DP-75/50" *3750# 2.5 sf 21"dia 48" * 1400# *600# DP-75163" 4200# 2.8 sf 22"dia 60" 1600# 600# Equivalency to Traditional Concrete Footings Minimum 2000 psf Sands/Gravels (SW,SP, SM,SC, GM,GC)3 Model/ Pin Bearing Load o Equivalent O Cylinder Frost Uplift Load Lateral Load No. Length Capacity Base Area Comparison Zone Capacity Capacity DP-50136" 3600# 1.8 sf 18"dia 24" 600# 600# DP-50142" *4000# 2.0 sf 19"dia 36" *900# *600# DP-50/50" 4400# 2.2 sf 20"dia 48" 1200# 600# DP-75150" *5600# 2.8 sf 22"dia 48" * 1400# *600# DP-75163" 6400# 3.2 sf 24"dia 60" 1600# 600# Equivalency to Traditional Concrete Footings *Interpolated from field test values. Notes: 1. This load chart is intended for simple structures supported by columns, posts, and beams loaded up to, but not exceeding,the stated capacities. It is not intended for structures with asymmetrical, rotational, overturning, or dynamic forces. Intended uses are described in section 2.0 of ICC-ES prescriptive bearing evaluation report ESR-1895. For projects that exceed the capacities or limitations defined herein, or the intended uses described in ESR-1895, contact PFI for additional information or site-specific capacity evaluation. See also the Use and Applications download at www.diamondpiers.com. 2. Capacities shown are tested to a Factor of Safety of 2, and are applicable in properly drained, normal sound soils only, with minimum soil bearing capacities as indicated. Copies of the field test reports are available from PFI upon request. 3. See IRC Table R401.4.1, "Presumptive Load-Bearing Values of Foundation Materials,"for a full description of applicable 1500 psf and 2000 psf soil types. For soils below 1500 psf, or soils with unknown characteristics, additional site and design analysis is required. For soils above 2000 psf,the values in this chart shall apply. 4. All capacities use four pins of the specified length per foundation. Pin length includes that portion of the pin embedded within the concrete head. See"Check Your Layout" in the Diamond Pier Installation Manual for more information on pin/pier layout and spacing restrictions. 5. For professional engineers designing for short-term transient loads, contact PFI for further information. ©2018 Pin Foundations,Inc.All Rights Reserved.D000008/01.2018 4810 Pt Fosdick Dr NW,PMB 60PIN FOUNDATIONS INC Toll Free: 866-255-9478 Gig Harbor,Washington 98335Main Office: 253-858-8809 www.pinfoundations.com General Email: info©diamondpiers.com