The URL can be used to link to this page

01/24/2012 - Airport Relations Commission AGENDA EAGAN AIRPORT RELATIONS COMMISSION MEETING EAGAN MUNICIPAL CENTER — EAGAN ROOM (2 FLOOR) TUESDAY, JANUARY 24, 2012 7:00 P.M. I. ROLL CALL AND AGENDA ADOPTION II. APPROVAL OF MINUTES III. VISITORS TO BE HEARD V. OLD BUSINESS A. Communications Update B. MAC Monthly Reports — Eagan/Mendota Heights Corridor Analysis/Technical Advisory Report /17 -35 Departure Analysis Report C. 2012 Open House at the Fire Safety Center VI. NEW BUSINESS A. Update on Release of Performance Based Navigation Flight Tracks B. May 8, 2012 Joint Meeting with the Mendota Heights' and Inver Grove Heights' Airport Commissions VII. STAFF / COMMMISSIONER REPORT A. Presentation by N.O.I.S.E. to the Noise Oversight Committee B. MSP 2020 Environmental Assessment Summary VIII. ROUNDTABLE IX. ADJOURNMENT Auxiliary aids for persons with disabilities will be provided upon advance notice of at least 96 hours. If a notice of less than 96 hours is received, the City of Eagan will attempt to provide such aid. C!ty of Eapll memo TO: THE EAGAN AIRPORT RELATIONS COMMISSION FROM: DIANNE MILLER, ASSISTANT CITY ADMINISTRATOR DATE: JANUARY 20, 2012 SUBJECT: AIRPORT RELATIONS COMMISSION MEETING / TUESDAY, JANUARY 24, 2012 The Eagan Airport Relations Commission will meet on Tuesday, January 24, 2011 at 7:00 p.m. in the Eagan Room (2 floor). In order that there is a quorum present, please contact Mary O'Brien at 651- 675 -5005 if you are unable to attend this meeting. I. ROLL CALL AND ADOPTION OF THE AGENDA The agenda, as presented or modified, is in order for adoption by the Commission. II. APPROVAL OF MINUTES The minutes of the Nov mber 29, 2011 Airport Relations Commission meeting are enclosed on pages LO through 4' . These minutes, as presented or modified, are in order for adoption by the Commission. III. VISITORS TO BE HEARD The Eagan City Council and its Commissions set aside up to ten minutes at the beginning of public meetings to permit visitors to address items of interest that are not addressed on the regular agenda. Items that will take more than ten minutes or that require specific action can be scheduled for a future meeting agenda. V. OLD BUSINESS A. Communications Update — It is the practice of the Airport Relations Commission to discuss their communication initiatives each month, which include articles in the Experience Eagan Newsletter, as well as stories aired on the City's local access cable channels. The Commission is welcome at this time to make additional suggestions for communication initiatives regarding airport issues. B. MAC Monthly Reports — Eagan/Mendota Heights Corridor Anal s is/Technica) Advisory Report /17 -35 Departure Analysis Report — Enclosed on pages 1 through is the December 2011 Eagan/Mendota Heights Corridor Analysis. Enclosed on pages 1_ Airport Relations Commission Meeting January 24, 2011 Page 2 al_ through is the December 2011 Technical Advisory Report. Enclosed on page through is the December 2011 Runway 17 Departure Analysis Report. Enclosed on pages — through (p is the Crossing in the Corridor report for the month of December 2011. C. 2012 Open House at the Fire Safety Center —Per the direction of the Commission at the November 29 meeting, the Fire Safety Center have been reserved for the ARC's 2012 open house on March 15, 2012 at 6:30 p.m. Chad Leqve of the MAC has confirmed he will attend the meeting and speak on the MAC's behalf. The City Council has also been invited to attend. Enclosed on page(pl is a map showing the neighborhoods to be invited to the open house per the ARC's direction. There are approximately 550 households in the area, which includes: • 108 properties in the McKee Development • 336 properties around the Bur Oaks area • 4 residential properties north of McKee and Bur Oaks off of Hwy 149 & Blue Gentian Road. • 38 households in the apartment/condo building on Dodd Lane (off of Hwy 149). • 65 households in the townhomes off of Crane Creek Lane and Crane Creek Place. The Commission will recall that a decision was made last year to move the open house from the fall to the spring thus there was no open house in 2011.As background information, enclosed on pages 690 and l 9 is the agenda from the November 2010 open house and a handout that was provided to each attendee summarizing the role of the ARC. Also enclosed, on pages D and '1 ! , are copies of the questions from the web -based survey that attendees were encouraged to complete before or after the open house. Hard copies of the survey were also available at the open house. Lastly, enclosed on page'`? L is a copy of the 2010 open house invitation. The Commission is encouraged to discuss the desired format for the March 15 open house, including whether a survey should again be offered, and if so, what changes or additions should made given the varying issues that may face the homes located within the Corridor. VI. NEW BUSINESS A. Update on Release of Performance Based Navigation Flight Tracks —On January 18, Assistant FAA ATCT Manager Carl Rydeen briefed the Noise Oversight Committee (NOC) on the development of the Performance Based Navigation (PBN) flight tracks. He noted that both arrival routes (referred to as STARS) and departure routes (referred to as SIDS) have been developed for all runways at MSP, and were tested via flight simulators. Mr. Rydeen added that as an outcome of the simulation process, they identified the need for additional tracks, which are currently being developed. As a result, the maps of the specific flight tracks are not yet available, and will likely be released to the NOC at the March or May meeting. Mr. Rydeen stated that it is his continued hope that the new procedures will be published and operational by mid -2013. Assistant City Administrator Miller can provide an additional update to the ARC at the January 24 meeting. 3 Airport Relations Commission Meeting January 24, 2011 Page 3 B. May 8, 2012 Joint Meeting with the Mendota Heights' and Inver Grove Heights' Airport Relations Commissions —Per the ARC's 2011 -2012 Work Plan, a joint meeting has been scheduled with the airport relations commissions from the cities of Mendota Heights and Inver Grove Heights. Both cities have been contacted to inquire about their interest and availability on the evening of May 8. Their respective staff liaisons will be speaking to the commissions in late January /early February about the opportunity. The ARC is welcome to brainstorm agenda items, format, etc. for the evening. The Commission will know by the March 13 ARC meeting if both of the other cities' commissions are available to meet, and if so, the commission can further discuss and define an agenda at the March meeting . VII. STAFF / COMMISSIONER REPORT A. Presentation by N.O.I.S.E. to the Noise Oversight Committee —On January 17, Dennis McGrann, Executive Director of the National Organization to Insure a Sound- Controlled Environment (N.O.I.S.E.), addressed members of the NOC with research done to date on the health impacts of airport noise. Assistant City Administrator Miller will provide a verbal update about the meeting at the January 24 ARC meeting. B. MSP 2020 Environmental Assessment Summary— Enclosed on pages l through is a memo from Chad Leqve, MAC Manager— Noise, Environment and Planning, regarding the finalization of the MSP 2020 Environmental Assessment Noise Analysis. The contents of the memo were presented to the NOC on January 18. In summary, there are no changes within Eagan to the forecasted 2020 or 2025 60 -65 DNL noise contours. In other words, the MAC is forecasting that no additional homes in Eagan will fall into the area currently receiving noise mitigation as a result of the proposed projects included in the 2020 plan. That said, there are additional homes in Minneapolis that are forecasted to be within the 60+ DNL contours by 2020. As a result of the additional homes in Minneapolis forecasted for the 60+ DNL contours, and at the suggestion of MAC staff, the NOC took action at the January 18 to recommend to the full MAC Commission that whenever operations reach 484,879 annual operations or by the year 2020 (whichever comes first), the MAC shall proceed with noise mitigation for the homes located in the 60+ DNL (per the 2020 EA forecasted, preferred alternative map) that is consistent with the mitigation prescribed in the 2007 consent decree. The preferred alternative for the 2020 plan includes the relocation of the non Sky Team airlines to Terminal 2- Humphrey. Additionally, the table on page 19 shows the forecasted runway usage for 2020 and 2025. Assistant City Administrator Miller can further update the Commission on the discussion of the NOC in their review of the EA document. A public input process will now commence regarding the EA. An open house has been scheduled for Tuesday, January 31 at the MAC offices from 5 -8 p.m. to give the public the opportunity to review the EA document and forecasted contours, operations, etc. Airport Relations Commission Meeting January 24, 2011 Page 4 VIII. ROUNDTABLE Per the request of the Commission, this agenda item has been added so that Commissioners have the opportunity to ask questions or make requests for future agenda items. IX. ADJOURNMENT Per the request of the Commission, the Eagan ARC meetings will go no later than 8:30 p.m. unless agreed upon by the Commission. Z i r tk* st-- 11 C-4.9-- Assistant City Administrator 5 MINUTES OF THE EAGAN AIRPORT RELATIONS COMMISSION MEETING NOVEMBER 29, 2011 A regular meeting of the Eagan Airport Relations Commission was held on Tuesday, November 29, 2011 at 7:00 p.m. Those present were Chuck Thorkildson, Curtis Aljets, Steve Beseke, Dan Johnson, Luke Olson, Chad Stambaugh, and Carol Whisnant. Also present was Assistant City Administrator Miller. AGENDA Whisnant made a motion to approve the agenda as presented. Aljets seconded the motion. All members voted in favor. APPROVAL OF MINUTES Beseke made a motion to approve the minutes of the May 10, 2011 regular meeting of the Eagan Airport Relations Commission. Stambaugh seconded the motion. All members voted in favor. VISITORS TO BE HEARD There were no visitors to be heard. PRESENTATIONS Assistant City Administrator Miller introduced Tammy Mencel — MAC Commissioner (District H) and Eagan's representative on the MAC. Miller noted Commissioner Mencel previously served on the Eagan Airport Relations Commission. Mencel provided a summary of current happenings at MSP Airport, including the redesign of the MAC Noise Office website (www.macnoise.com ), which is anticipated to go live in early December 2011. Mencel also spoke about the anticipated performance based navigation system being reviewed by the FAA for use at MSP Airport. Mencel also spoke about enhancements to both terminals at MSP. Mencel answered questions raised by the Commission. Miller introduced the next presenters, John Nelson, MAC Noise Mitigation Program Manager and Chuck Rodgers from the Center of Energy and Environment of the MAC. Nelson summarized the progress on the noise mitigation program currently underway as a result of the 2007 consent decree. The Commission provided feedback on the noise mitigation program. COMMUNICATIONS UPDATE Miller stated it is the practice of the Airport Relations Commission to discuss their communication initiatives each month, which include articles in the Experience Eagan Newsletter as well as stories aired on the City's local access cable channels. Eagan Airport Relations Commission November 29, 2011 Page 2 of 3 A discussion took place about informing residents of the close approaching deadline for homeowners to apply for noise reduction dollars. It was suggested by the Commission to add the deadline to Eagan's website. MAC MONTHLY REPORTS — EAGAN/MENDOTA HEIGHTS CORRIDOR ANALYSIS/TECHNICAL ADVISORY REPORT /17 -35 DEPARTURE ANALYSIS REPORT /CROSSING THE CORRIDOR REPORT Miller introduced the item stating the October 2011 Eagan/Mendota Heights Corridor Analysis Report, the October 2011 Technical Advisory Report, the October 2011 Runway 17 Departure Analysis Report, and the October 2011 Crossing in the Corridor Report were the most recent reports available on the MAC website. The Commission discussed the reports. 2011 -2012 WORK PLAN REVIEW Miller stated that the RNAV Tracks were to be presented to the Noise Oversight Committee (NOC) at the November 2011 meeting; however, due to FAA delays, the tracks are now proposed to be presented at the January NOC meeting. As a result, a decision was made to reschedule the January ARC meeting to January 31, 2012. 2012 OPEN HOUSE The Commission discussed the annual open house, and directed that the Bur Oaks and Chapel Hill neighborhoods be invited to the March 15, 2012 open house. There was commission consensus to proceed with their March 13 regular ARC meeting. The Commission requested that the open house be held at the Fire Safety Center, if available. The Commission requested that Chad Leqve and other MAC representatives be invited to attend. The Commission directed further conversation about open house plans to the January ARC meeting. FLIGHT TRACKER MAPPING TOOL The Commission discussed a new flight tracker application tool the Metropolitan Airports Commission recently implemented that allows a user to view flight data 10 minutes after the flight occurred. NEW NOC CO -CHAIR AND CHIEF PILOT Assistant City Administrator Miller stated that Delta appointed Jeffry Hart, General Manager of Customer Service, as the new NOC Co- Chair. Miller noted that Hart is an Eagan resident who will replace representative Mary Loeffelholz, who has been involved in the airport industry for many years, but is resigning from the NOC due to a transfer to Atlanta. Miller noted that Delta Chief Pilot Bill Underwood was also appointed to the NOC, and Bloomington City Councilmember Vern Wilcox was appointed as the Co -chair representing the communities. Eagan Airport Relations Commission November 29, 2011 Page 3 of 3 NEW MAC NOISE PROGRAM WEBSITE Assistant City Administrator Miller provided an overview of the new MAC Noise website. LETTER TO THE FAA FROM CITY OF MINNEAPOLIS Assistant City Administrator Miller summarized a letter to the FAA from the City of Minneapolis raising concerns about noise to the east of Runway 30R. PROPOSED 2012 NOISE OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE (NOC) WORK PLAN The Commission reviewed the 2011 NOC accomplishments and the draft 2012 NOC work plan. Per the suggestion of Assistant City Administrator Miller, the Commission asked that the Runway 35 River Visual Approach Procedure be included on the 2012 NOC Work Plan. RUNWAY 35 RIVER VISUAL APPROACH PROCEDURES Assistant City Administrator Miller noted that the FAA once again reviewed the river visual procedure for Runway 17/35 and stated that such a procedure it is still premature. Miller added that the FAA believes the river procedure may be an opportunity in the future when the performance based navigation system is being utilized. 2010 -2011 MSP AIRCRAFT FLEET MIX TRENDS Miller stated that Delta's Chief Pilot informed the NOC that Delta plans to phase out all DC 9's by the end of 2012. Commissioners noted that between 2010 and 2011 there was a reduction of A320s and a large increase in MD 90s. ROUNDTABLE There were no additional items or comments. ADJOURNMENT Upon motion by Aljets, seconded by Whisnant, the meeting adjourned at 8:12 p.m. All members voted in favor. DATE SECRETARY 9 12/1/201 1 - 12/31/201 1 Eagan- Mendota Heights Departure Corridor Analysis Minneapolis -St. Paul International Airport AfSP hu 4 Corridor rsa 0 4') Aifir an t., This re or i iormati na purpose l and cannot t b s fo us e nf d for enforcement o purpeonosKs Metropolitan Airports Commission 2121 Carrier Jets Departed Runways 12L and 12R in December 2011 ** 2056 (96.9 %) of those operations remained in the Corridor i . iali - .. ° e t t� . w `►'�" -��' a v i, • li1ryt'n fr t-r..go . "!E� :.41".,..-N. . ' „ �s ��11 &~�� I iiii *1 - j' ,1 rl ,`°¢ z ' 1 7 _ c " , it ,►� - ' fchflel!, ?. �, Z :* kkYY��.:� �� li �+ �► !: .rim " '" 441 ,l,„7.0, ..,,,,,-...- - - ,, , 0° j''°"")r'''' - • ' ' ' . ,''' r ��'� / i .✓r''_ ,, /� '.,+,},i „ . : <,. 1 ,rl''�" v, rl" / . r y . • ... � v i ;# 1 ,.. } 3 ,11'R i 2121 Total 12L & 12R Carrier Departure 2056 (96.9 %) Total 12L & 12R Carrier Operations Departure Operations in the Corridor Minneapolis -St. Paul Penetration Gate Plot for In Corridor Gate 12/1/2011 00:00:00 -12/31 /2011 23:59:59 2056 Tracks Crossed Gate: Left = 1309 (63.7 %), Right = 747 (36.3 %) 'A r / A - -- ,- e" --,,-%>' -%/' e/" b f ' Y f, 0 a ill!l +� O- 0 ao $. 0 a s p /4 t+.. ' c ." "� �► * r� - ' "ice • . O' a te, 40 -, ,tea .4 -0.40 -0.60 ,-.0-44',.„-.2.-' 04° ..+w 4' .$a , Q ,<. 0 , N ' ..2° ' j w lo bre to V 1t'bF / / tt G,± ' ' , 1 1* // ' ',4''', t Din „ ti - < . 10 leW ; , < , � tuna 11'nat - - / in ' ", i',6 * *Note: flight tracking data were unavailable between 12/27/11 at 9:53 a.m. and 12/28/11 at 7:42 a.m. Monthly Eagan /Mendota Heights Departure Corridor Analysis. Report Generated: 01/11/2012 11:41 Page 1 fd Metropolitan Airports Commission 34 (1.6 %) Runway 12L and 12R Carrier Jet Departure Operations were north of the 090 Corridor Boundary during December 2011 Of those, 4( —) returned to corridor before reaching SE border of Ft. Snelling State Park i , . _. �!#b11 ►1 /t '111' ) 0 "`. i £ ,._:. /., ' Po . t i x '10 At # -.-44:-= , , 0 , , 'i"..:1 °. $:;.: 4 + 4 ' .- e ----- , ' . }.. ,' :,,,, r_ li e «wnvr' -fin ' ` ,, 'd ? ! .i .� / , „,,,,):.,;,,,It ! , *' �t{e� ,r i&--,11.1 -� X 4 . 4 rt € 1€ ' . Ilfl �af Aai EP p`� 2 t� if G/i4 �y ' � -� �y , ' f � � � � 3 11 Per ., , . , in 4 Gr. '- I [eights w� '; . gan il ', sue_ i. —.. ' 1 a / s - ' - ,,,,.. 7 _ f - .; 1,;, '' A ... : , A Gr I - Twp , if jr i . .. .„ ---- ,—; 1 ,,,,, t......, ,,-,-; ..,,,,,,,. F V"-- f Jft Minneapolis -St. Paul Penetration Gate Plot for North Corridor Gate 12/1/2011 00:00:00 - 12/31/2011 23:59:59 34 Tracks Crossed Gate: Left = 5 (14.7 %), Right = 29 (85.3 %) '/,'/ ''''';,.M- Vi •�j� ? A g /i � �/ „,. .. a,,, ,,. . ue,_ . 'A° i 0 aeon ° ° 00 ,g 0 o a> a ° 0 4 0 0 ° ° 0 2 , - ° ° ° ' 0 r % Z '7 /,,Z-...1,00, o- f% A ,r% 3 i. 3a 0*' / f * 1.. ilia 3. ” " Z ' ,, /i - w_ N%f� / - % ,' % - i -;,,e',', �ixt . YlF1�fsC °, #rtaf3• on�'�'+at�F �'#.tAiAk tlplr'aWSiM.. is • . iii 4,-/ Page 2 Monthly Eagan /Mendota Heights Departure i o�ridorAnalysis. Report Generated: 01/11/2012 11:41 Metropolitan Airports Commission 31 (1.5 %) Runway 12L and 12R Carrier Jet Departure Operations were south of the Corridor (south of 30L Localizer) during December 2011. Of those, 6( —) returned to Corridor before reaching SE border of Ft. Snelling State Park irk - x.41 6 fi R2 . 6 ' > � p � p ® ,,® : , 7a s les { � s L' ® ' , . - k.. s. hSt € il ia, . ■-, -:i; I i! ,,, .. g rA. ` , , g ' .. _ fr rloor ; •t f � k om " t, � b M 4 r. az - aul ,P `\ i .,s ... ` • ' '''''-----------.' " - z' '11* - fr ‘i if ) t - ' ,,,,,„i',/ - „,e kA,-,-_ : „,-., - — .,,,tr% t. - N-`:;.,2w...- - -:,..1-,-;5;s: ,-41 - ..,-'-' I h4- ''''' '‘ 0 ..*A„, a: . 70A/ 11 .- 'vkallo‘,,'h 1 0f1,00:,-,,,,,' - ...- -,,,- --':-:' ',, 'k P ' I -.4,,In 0. 1 / #.-- 4 ' '''''''',;-,,-- i , - -,' :, i i A . _ . i l i 0 °P. I Ili \ ; Minneapolis -St. Paul Penetration Gate Plot for South Corridor Gate 12/1/2011 00:00:00 - 12/31/2011 23:59:59 31 Tracks Crossed Gate: Left = 23 (74.2 %), Right = 8 (25,8 %) r rr er €� o 0 o 0 0 x a' ° 0 0 Q A o° 0 o o 0 0 ,; ° 0 S N, /° *In c*** ?( 51 Y H * o y " is i{d[IAhi,a %i is ran , gr ' Monthly Eagan /Mendota Heights Departure Corridor Analysis. Report Generated: 01/11/2012 11:41 Page 3 I'9) Metropolitan Airports Commission 6 (0.3 %) Runway 12L and 12R Carrier Jet Departure Operations were 5° south of the Corridor (5° south of 30L Localizer) during December 2011 i ll I# _- _� -„ i I ® 1 a _,� ; - b ; t ' d' a ' ,as 1/est St x ' . ,t,„ __,!:ri ,."'''''' 2 t ! g‘ ,, : _ - ./f,,,,,,,,„„,, � � ♦, . ` j is n frh �, t - Oi . 5' IklE' 1591 ER , - •,� ms„µ••' _ 6 �F 810° '••'" > ` 9 ' ` a ". aul Pare in Gr a - ; . �� 'a / t ', % s- ,, I , ..,1 . ¢ 7 p °s c`# � �18,�. ® " ,two. i F � '% � -p / ,s 4 Ualle j 4 ri --;^ tos ,tint b vi e , 1. Minneapolis -St. Paul Penetration Gate Plot for 5° South Corridor Gate 1 12/1 /2011 00:00:00 - 12/31/2011 23:59:59 6 Tracks Crossed Gate: Left = 6 (100 %), Right = 0 (0 %) x / s r h u i2 z a '',1 1/' ' : ' 1 o , i e: ' ",,,,,,.„,-.....44.4,-$.; ..0 ,4 -0,0 -o a sr .x a.a o.4 r _� .z 4 ,N,/, , ,2. 2 %, ` z �,/ - ,, g; , rzn , 4 t40..: ,., . 3x x 05perrllan ;ot«'r ec / - ' to above nrapA. • Page 4 Monthly Eagan /Mendota Heights Departure Corridor Analysis. Report Generated: 01/11/2012 11:41 1 3 Metropolitan Airports Commission Top 15 Runway 12L/12R Departure Destinations for December 2011 Airport City Heading e #Ops Total Ops SEA SEATTLE 278° 82 3.9% ORD CHICAGO (O'HARE) 124° 70 3.3% FAR FARGO 312° 64 3% BIS BISMARCK 291° 63 3% GFK GRAND FORKS 316° 60 2.8% CYYZ TORONTO 95° 58 2.7% MOT MINOT 304° 57 2.7% CYWG WINNIPEG 330° 52 2.5% SLC SALT LAKE CITY 252° 48 2.3% GRB GREEN BAY 90° 46 2.2% BOS BOSTON 97° 42 2% RAP RAPID CITY 269° 42 2% DLH DULUTH 19° 40 1.9% SFO SAN FRANCISCO 251° 39 1.8% DTW DETROIT 105° 37 1.7% Monthly Eagan /Mendota Heights Departure Corridor Analysis. Report Generated: 01/11/2012 11:41 Page 5 JL+ December 2011 Noise Overs Committee (NOC) Technical Advisor's Report S p , O j �� k3„...., co''1�,K Minneapo - St. Paul International A v m.. - ,,,,,...--- :,,,,,,. 0 „-. L'' . „ t I 1., ,,,, . , :it --- ,,,;1„4- . - '„," ',-..„ ,,,... -.),,,,-' ,-* , - 1;3#' , , f , 1 ‘4.,4,-;-.-„.0,,,,- ,' . N . ' 'k ,.', ' go, it),,,,, ./.. ..,„ - s ,-- , , A -,..-,,, . - , ,..,....„ - t . , , # .. --- / - .,,,, 4 _ t e .^' - - '. -AN d X4 b ` �' 5 8 4 i -ate = ¢ �Q� hr z m o A o MAC IS Table of Contents for December 2011 Complaint Summary 1 Noise Complaint Map 2 FAA Available Time for Runway Usage 3 MSP All Operations Runway Usage 4 MSP Carrier Jet Operations Runway Usage 5 MSP Carrier Jet Fleet Composition 6 MSP All Operations Nighttime Runway Usage 7 MSP Carrier Jet Operations Nighttime Runway Usage 8 MSP Scheduled Nighttime Operators 9 -11 MSP Top 15 Nighttime Operators by Type 12 MSP Top 15 Nighttime Operators Stage Mix 13 Airport Noise and Operations Monitoring System Flight Tracks 14 -17 MSP ANOMS Remote Monitoring Tower Site Locations Map 18 Time Above dB Threshold for Carrier Jet Arrival Related Noise Events 19 Time Above dB Threshold for Carrier Jet Departure Related Noise Events 20 Carrier Jet Arrival Related Noise Events 21 Carrier Jet Departure Related Noise Events 22 MSP Top Ten Aircraft Noise Events per RMT 23 -35 Analysis of Daily and Monthly Aircraft Noise Events DNL 36 -38 � A Product of the t Aviation Noise and Satellite Program MSP Complaints by City December 2011 Number of Number of % of Total City Arrival Departure Other Complaints Complainants Complaints MINNEAPOLIS 3 83 7 436 90 623 1242 62 37% EAGAN 0 7 5 944 6 183 1145 24 34.1% EDINA 0 1 0 355 0 37 393 3 11.7% MENDOTA 0 0 1 175 19 1 196 8 5.8% HEIGHTS INVER GROVE 0 0 0 1 0 135 136 2 4 % HEIGHTS RICHFIELD 0 0 0 70 2 2 74 2 2.2% SAINT PAUL 0 57 0 0 1 3 61 4 1.8% SAINT LOUIS PARK 0 28 0 0 0 13 41 2 1.2% APPLE VALLEY 0 8 0 3 0 17 28 5 0.8% CHANHASSEN 0 2 0 0 0 12 14 2 0.4% LAKEVILLE 0 7 0 1 2 0 10 2 0.3% BLOOMINGTON 1 0 0 1 2 4 8 4 0.2% SAVAGE 0 0 0 2 0 3 5 1 0.1% BURNSVILLE 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 I 0.1% ROBBINSDALE 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0% ROSEMOUNT 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0% PLYMOUTH 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 0% COTTAGE GROVE 0 0 0 0 1 0 I 1 0% Total 197 2002 1160 3359 126 Nature of MSP Complaints Time of Day Complaints by Airport Complaint Total Time Total Airport Total Early/Late 44 753 0000 -0559 6 55 MSP 3359 Engine Run -up 0 171 0600 -0659 14 121 Airlake 0 Excessive Noise 135 2778 0700 -1159 45 923 Anoka 50 Frequency 81 2363 1200 -1559 17 610 Crystal 0 Ground Noise 3 157 1600 -1959 29 790 Flying Cloud 139 Helicopter 0 4 2000 -2159 12 401 Lake Elmo 0 Low Flying 15 1385 2200 -2259 12 290 St. Paul 3 Structural Disturbance 2 603 2300 -2359 6 28 Misc. 0 Other 2 108 Total 3359 Total 3551 Total 8604 Note: Shaded Columns represent MSP complaints filed via the Internet Sum of % Total of Complaints may not equal 100% due to rounding. "As of May 2005, the MSP Complaints by City report includes multiple complaint descriptors per individual complaint. Therefore, the number of complaint descriptors may be more than the number of reported complaints. Report Generated: 01/11/2012 18:42 17 - 1 - MSP International Airport Aviation Noise Complaints for December 2011 �; a , :: r a okl yr� Par �" >Iri `Map g e 4 / i ce , ` $ h ® V A .r �B 4,- I S r` ,I.,, - M edina * `, , , - , m., 0, 0 - ., '''', ''. `tIr" , -A liti '%''' _ 3., t ' ‘, - 0 7 :1911kl . ' '*'' ‘, i ing:1 ''. 1. ' ' • Cron ® 'Q4 y > ji ■ E III E 7 a l (J inn + o : ® '''4- i , -4 - " , -A' ...1. i i 'e _ ,.",,,,, -- / , : • i `. ,- It , - -' ,,V. - i . 0 ' i 4 ' R 35E , Ioom i n ,, n i n l r•. Hei r. . ffi h w i./41Pljlt akop€ e, Bu I I I s' • ISSI5SIPPI'RI#J€R ,,,,'' 'n -:: 4 6, „ ... ‘,51,-'4Ve. 4 slet 4,,, =*- A pp 6 Valle RoSemq ti,.. I Pr"- 6 * :',V*1.: - q Lakeville le , mpire Twp. p g Lake Twp. �iµi armor • •Ierr a T e w Market N Eureka Twp. o n Two Number of Complaints per Address • • • • • • • I 1-4 5 -12 13 -26 27-44 45 -92 93 -179 180 -280 281 -449 2 - I Report Generated: 01/11/2012 18:42 Available Hours for Runw Use Decem 201 (Source: FAA Aviation Systems Performance Metrics Data) All Hours �.: M ®alis . - ( :t. ul Aiwa e p(Y �� PF R s '� s � 4k 11 4 •. ti i hfiel i o t`; o `�; 111, . ,.,: ,.,,, Q T R .g i BIO'l 7 ‘,,,::?:,`':=;,,,.,:,,,,:,;;,,, ' ' '' 4. .... s IN Nighttime Hours 1 1 O:3Opm to 6 cIs M. :v : :ff 1 Ilirt 'fix *o ,. a^' 1 Os I I 1Ihf ieJd ti * / ,+ E ``~ .,,, ,„,,,,., w I T, '' i 1i , € > f� tz:21 li I BIo ins as ;fl � ., i Report Generated: 01/11/2012 18:42 3 All Operations Runway Use Report Decembe 2011 ** 5; 2 ' , '' ' �� .,` . au I e � z it , 4,, - - Vp'11 :irkik?i. /; ;:'' ' '. ':Tilli!! ' , ' ''' 71111 110%At -'- e ®I ,i : *3 'VA l; r � ,1 ,� i (unorg. .., i t . I ,,,, : r ii 1 a ,, ' 4,0 ": ' .i ' 1 4,i / . ''' iii f ihf t IN s; /. , f i B • In • � � � n �„� - r V ,. ,, 3 , ,,, if tq\a, ,,,...,` k i Arrival/ Count Last Year Last Year RWY Departure Overflight Area Operations Count Percent 04 Arr So. Richfield /Bloomington 2 0% Percent 0 0% 12L Arr So. Minneapolis /No RichRichfield eld 2555 15.6% 2918 17% 12R Arr S o. Minneapolis /No. fi 2548 15.5% 3007 17.5% 17 Arr So. Minneapolis 38 0.2% 1 0% 22 Arr St. Paul /Highland Park 99 0.6% 2 0% 30L Arr Eagan /Mendota Heights Heights 3847 23.4% 3508 20.4% 30R Arr Eagan /Mendota 4263 26% 4380 25.4% 35 Arr Bloomington /Eagan 3054 18.6% 3395 19.7% Total Arrivals 16406 17211 Count Arrival/ Last Year RWY Departure Overflight Area Operations Percent Count Last PercYear ent 04 Dep S t. Paul /Highland Park 0 0% 51 0.3 12L Dep Eagan /Mendota 1564 9.6% 1921 11.2% 12R Dep Eagan /Mendota Heights Heights 740 4.5% 1319 7.7% 17 Dep Bloomington /Eagan 3869 23.7% 3181 18.6% 22 Dep S Rich o. Richfield /Bloomington 6 0% 7 0% 30L Dep So. Minneapolis /No. Richfield eld 5255 32.1 % 5037 29.4% 30R Dep So. Minneapolis /No. fi 4924 30.1 % 5617 32.8% 35 Dep So. Minneapolis 0 0% 9 0.1% Total Departures 16358 17142 Total Operations 32764 34353 * *Note: flight tracking data were unavailable between 12/27/11 at 9:53 a.m. and 12/28/11 at 7:42 a.m. 4 Report Generated: 01/11/2012 18:42 Carrier Jet Operations Runway Use Report December 2011 ** up -,,,,,... if, T uk y� i 6 t''''i PI,'":7R/ Y 0. ilf4:.%-ti: '''r -."'--- ‘Nr,-,, 4 0 ii 1 1 � i i• (uno ,�; ...,,,, ..,,,,:,,.,,,,,,-. Rhfleld ,�� 11 it t --Al � i s €§ � A >. II t B • If.( O G k / c._ t ' g d Arrival/ Count Last Ye ar* Last Year R WY Dep arture Overflight Area Operations 7 50.%8% rcent Count Percent 04 Arr So. Richfield /Bloomington 0 0 0% 12L Arr So. Minneapolis /No. Richfield 2410 2602 17.1 12R Arr So. Minneapolis /No. Richfield 2311 15.2% 2658 17.5% 17 Arr So. Minneapolis 35 0.2% 1 0% 22 Arr St. Paul /Highland Park 94 0.6% 1 0% 30L Arr Eagan /Mendota Heights 3463 22.7% 3024 19.9% 30R Arr Eagan /Mendota Heights 4087 26.8% 4007 26.4% 35 Arr Bloomington /Eagan 2829 18.6% 2897 19.1 Total Arrivals 15229 15190 Last Year Arrival/ Count Last Year* RWY Departure Overfligh A rea Operations Percent Count Percent 04 Dep St. P au l /Hig hland Park 0 0% 40 0.3% 12L Dep Eagan /Mendota H 1449 9.5% 1608 10.7% 12R Dep Eagan /Mendota He 672 4.4% 1180 7.8% 17 Dep Bloomington /E 3662 24% 2932 19.4% 22 Dep So. Richfield /Bloomingt 2 0% 7 0% 30L Dep So. Minneapo /No. Richfield 4855 31.8% 4439 29.4% 30R Dep So. Minneapolis /No. Richfield 4625 30.3% 4874 32.3% 35 Dep So. Minneapolis 0 0% 7 0% Total Departures 15265 15087 Total Opera tions 30494 30277 'NOTE: Due to flight tracking data enhancements, the air carrier operations counts for Last Year induded i n this report have be en update to reflect revised aircraft type co unts. Please refer to the interadive reports at www.macnoise.com for detailed information regarding aircraft ty Sum of RUS % not equal 100 °k due to rounding. '*Note: flight tracking data were unavailable between 12/27/11 at 9:53 a.m. and 12/28/11 at 7: a.m. Report Generated: 01 /11 /20 18:42 O� I 5 December 2011 MSP Carrier Jet Fleet Composition * FAR Part 36 Take - Type Off Noise Level' Aircraft Description Stage Count Percent B742 110 Boeing 747 -200 3 18 0.1% Al24 109.9 Antonov An -124 3 4 0% DC10 101.8 McDonnell Douglas DC10 3 158 0.5% DC9Q 98.1 McDonnell Douglas DC9 Modified Stage 3 3 225 0.7% B72Q 97.6 Boeing 727 Modified Stage 3 3 47 0.2% B777 96.2 Boeing 777 3 56 0.2% DC8Q 95.7 McDonnell Douglas DC8 Re- manufactured 3 40 0.1% A330 95.6 Airbus Industries A330 3 84 0.3% MD11 92.8 McDonnell Douglas MD11 3 60 0.2% B767 92.1 Boeing 767 -200 3 264 0.9% MD80 91.5 McDonnell Douglas MD80 3 822 2.7% A300 91.5 Airbus Industries A300 3 24 0.1 % B73Q 91.4 Boeing 737 Modified Stage 3 3 5 0% B757 91.4 Boeing 757 -200 3 1705 5.6% A321 89.8 Airbus Industries A321 3 138 0.5% B734 88.9 Boeing 737 -400 3 14 0% B738 88.6 Boeing 737 -800 3 1687 5.5% B739 88.4 Boeing 737 -900 3 28 0.1% A320 87.8 Airbus Industries A320 3 2957 9.7% B735 87.7 Boeing 737 -500 3 74 0.2% B733 87.5 Boeing 737 -300 3 409 1.3% A319 87.4 Airbus Industries A319 3 1620 5.3% E190 86.9 Embraer 190 3 114 0.4% B7377 85.9 Boeing 737 -700 3 906 3% CRJ9 84.6 Canadair Regional Jet CRJ -900 3 1914 6.3% MD90 84.2 McDonnell Douglas MD90 3 1769 5.8% A318 84.1 Airbus Industries A318 3 10 0% B717 84.1 Boeing 717 3 314 1% E170 83.7 Embraer 170 3 4821 15.8% E145 83.7 Embraer 145 3 677 2.2% CRJ7 83.2 Canadair Regional Jet CRJ -700 3 968 3.2% CRJ1 79.8 Canadair Regional Jet CRJ -100 3 202 0.7% CRJ 79.8 Canadair Regional Jet CRJ 3 103 0.3% CRJ2 78.7 Canadair Regional Jet CRJ -200 3 8246 27% E135 77.9 Embraer 135 3 7 0% J328 _ 76.5 Fairchild Dornier 328 3 4 0% Totals 30494 _ **Flight tracking data were unavailable between 12/27/11 at 9:53 a.m. and 12/28/11 at 7:42 a.m. Sum of fleet mix % may not equal 100% due to rounding. Current Last Year Count Percent Percent' Stage 2 0 0% 0% Stage 3 281 0.9% 2.8% Stage 3 Manufactured 30213 99.1% 97.2% Total Stage 3 30494 NOTE 1: Stage 3 represent aircraft modified to meet all Stage 3 criteria as outlined in Federal Aviation Regulation (FAR) Part 36. This includes hushkit engines, engine retrofits or aircraft operational flight configurations. -The Provided Noise levels from FAR Part 36 are the loudest levels documented for the representative aircraft type during take -off measured in EPNL dBA (Effective Perceived Noise Level). -EPNL is the level of the time integral of the antilogarithm of one -tenth of tone - corrected perceived noise level of an aircraft flyover measured in A- weighted decibels. NOTE 2: Due to flight tracking data enhancements, the air carrier operations counts for Last Year included in this report have been updated to reflect revised aircraft type counts. Please refer to the interactive reports at www.macnoise.com for detailed information regarding aircraft types. - 6 - o., Report Generated: 01/11/2012 18:42 Nighttime All Operations 10:30 p.m. to 6:00 a.m. Runway Use Report December 2011 .4, " c .s « «1i S \' aul it I . rya . „'..,,,,- - : —7 -,.4,' <-:::%-;-,4":„. 1 jr*;;,....:4;Z:..., i ' "°' %3#11 1 li !'i i ' /'� ' k . Rihtield '`.; . d a li !! , >, B 1ming 5i 6 r' , 1 3 li 1 I ' Arrival/ Count Last Year Last Year RWY Departure Overflight Area Operations Percent Count Percent 04 Arr So. Richfield /Bloomington 0 0% 0 0% 12L Arr So. Minneapolis /No. Richfield 40 4.9% 172 16% 12R Arr So. Minneapolis /No. Richfield 159 19.4% 285 26.5% 17 Arr So. Minneapolis 0 0% 0 0% 22 Arr St. Paul /Highland Park 0 0% 1 0.1% 30L Arr Eagan /Mendota Heights 457 55.8% 336 31.2% 30R Arr Eagan /Mendota Heights 155 18.9% 271 25.2% 35 Arr Bloomington /Eagan 8 1% 12 1.1% Total Arrivals 819 1077 Arrival/ Count Last Year Last Year RWY Departure Overflight Area Operations Percent Count Percent 04 Dep St. Paul /Highland Park 0 0% 1 0.2% 12L Dep Eagan /Mendota Heights 17 8.8% 119 21.6% 12R Dep Eagan /Mendota Heights 60 30.9% 189 34.3% 17 Dep Bloomington /Eagan 32 16.5% 17 3.1% 22 Dep So. Richfield /Bloomington 0 0% 0 0% 30L Dep So. Minneapolis /No. Richfield 54 27.8% 116 21.1% 30R Dep So. Minneapolis /No. Richfield 31 16% 108 19.6% 35 Dep So. Minneapolis 0 0% 1 0.2% Total Departures 194 551 Total Operations 1013 1628 * *Note: Flight tracking data were unavailable between 12/27/11 at 9:53 a.m. and 12/28/11 at 7:42 a.m. Report Generated: 01/11/2012 18:42 a 3 - 7 Nighttime Carrier Jet Operations 10:30 p.m. to 6:00 a.m. Runway Use Report December 2011 psi : _ ads - olis aul • a' '- 3. P_I R %E � n t om.: �. I " :i.. (unorg. R l hfia - l k i < , LI -.. Fl i e } B Ingo :_ ( ' F . , ' .. r , �>" Arrival/ Count Last Year* Last Year RWY Departure Overflight Area Operations Percent Count Percent 04 Arr So. Richfield /Bloomington 0 0% 0 0% 12L Arr So. Minneapolis /No. Richfield 40 5.2% 160 16.1% 12R Arr So. Minneapolis /No. Richfield 149 19.2% 261 26.3% 17 Arr So. Minneapolis 0 0% 0 0% 22 Arr St. Paul /Highland Park 0 0% 0 0% 30L Arr Eagan /Mendota Heights 428 55.2% 307 30.9% 30R Arr Eagan /Mendota Heights 150 19.4% 256 25.8% 35 Arr Bloomington /Eagan 8 1% 10 1% Total Arrivals 775 994 Arrival/ Count Last Year* Last Year RWY Departure Overflight Area Operations Percent Count Percent 04 Dep St. Paul /Highland Park 0 0% 1 0.2% 12L Dep Eagan /Mendota Heights 16 9.4% 106 22.1% 12R Dep Eagan /Mendota Heights 46 27.1% 169 35.2% 17 Dep Bloomington /Eagan 31 18.2% 16 3.3% 22 Dep So. Richfield /Bloomington 0 0% 0 0% 30L Dep So. Minneapolis /No. Richfield 47 27.6% 89 18.5% 30R Dep So. Minneapolis /No. Richfield 30 17.6% 98 20.4% 35 Dep So. Minneapolis 0 0% 1 0.2% Total Departures 170 480 Total Operations 945 1474 'NOTE Due to flight tracking data enhancements, the air carrier operations counts for Last Year included in this report have been updated to reflect revised aircraft type counts. Please refer to the interactive reports at www.macnoise.com for detailed information regarding aircraft types. Sum of RUS % may not equal 100% due to rounding. "Note: flight tracking data were unavailable between 12/27/11 at 9:53 a.m. and 12/28/11 at 7:42 a.m. 8 - a4 Report Generated: 01/11/2012 18:42 Janu 20 N ighttime Scheduled Carrier Jet Operations 1 0:30 p. m. to 6:00 a.m. 100 ' D D El m 90 A o $ M T m UPS AA 40- ALA 80 USA LAAVIA ., • FOX © 70 A - , SWA "E'; �� "° � � � � AAL ++ ,✓ ro 1 F lo © E FT 60 O t- 3 ' f i t1 AL ` �;KU , cu a 10 1 *. % r a , 0 lai o u� O u o I( O In o U) O I) O In a in O u� O In o u� o u� o ino 1C) o u� c, - = ,n 01 - o 4 c-i v :_... a ti c-: v o 7! o- v O r: v o' v o ti C) v Ji C-4 N N N N N O O O O O O O O O 6 O O O O O O O O O O O O O Tim January 2012 Ma Nighttime Scheduled Carrier Jet Operations 10:30 p.m. to 6:00 a.m. nufactured Airline Stage 2 Stage 3 Stage 3 Total De lta (DAL) 0 0 148 148 Sun Country ( SCX) 0 0 106 106 Airtran (TRS) 0 0 62 62 UP (UPS) 0 0 54 54 US Airways (USA) 0 0 41 41 Fe- (FDX) 0 0 34 34 Southwes (SWA) 0 0 22 22 American (AAL) 0 0 17 17 Continental (COA) 0 0 17 17 Frontier Airlines (EFT) 0 0 13 13 United (UAL) 0 0 5 5 Total 0 0 519 519 Report Generated: 01/11/2012 18:42 Qb - 9 - January 2012 Nighttime Scheduled Carrier Jet Operations Flight Days of Time A/D Carrier Number Equipment Stage 3 Operation Routing 22:31 A United 752 A320 M Su ORD MSP 22:35 A Sun Country 246 B737 M ThSu JFK MSP 22:37 A Continental 4390 E145 M W EWR MSP 22:41 A Delta 2034 B753 M MTWThFSSu ATL MSP 22:44 A Airtran 869 B737 M MTWThFSSu ATL MSP 22:46 A Frontier Airlines 108 A320 M MThFSu MCO DEN MSP 22:50 A Sun Country 404 B737 M ThSu SAN MSP 22:57 A Sun Country 426 B737 M F LAX MSP 22:57 A Sun Country 426 B738 M M LAX MSP 22:58 A Delta 512 A320 M F MEX DTW MSP 22:58 A Delta 512 B738 M MTWTh MEX DTW MSP 23:15 A Sun Country 732 B738 M S SXM SJU MSP 23:17 A Sun Country 604 B737 M TS PHX MSP 23:17 A Sun Country 604 B738 M MWThFSu PHX MSP 23:18 A Sun Country 418 B737 M Su PSP MSP 23:24 A United 463 A320 M F EWR ORD MSP 23:25 A Sun Country 396 B737 M MF SFO MSP 23:25 A Sun Country 384 B737 M TWSu RSW MSP 23:35 A American 1284 MD80 M MTWThFSu SAT DFW MSP 23:35 A Southwest 1809 B737 M Su LAX PHX MSP 23:35 A Southwest 561 B737 M MTWThF LAX PHX MSP 23:46 A Delta 1568 738 M MTWThFSSu LAX MSP 23:47 A Delta 300 A320 M W ATL MSP 23:50 A American 1284 MD80 M S DFW MSP 23:51 A Delta 300 MD80 M S ATL MSP 23:51 A Delta 300 MD90 M MTThFSu ATL MSP 23:57 A US Airways 984 A320 M WThFSu CLT MSP 23:57 A US Airways 984 A319 M S CLT MSP 23:58 A Sun Country 106 B738 M MTWThFSu LAS MSP 23:58 A Sun Country 106 B737 M S LAS MSP 23:59 A US Airways 55 A321 M M PHX MSP 00:04 A US Airways 55 A321 M MWThFSSu PHX MSP 00:05 A American 3731 CRJ M MTWThFS ORD MSP 00:30 A Delta 1682 A320 M MTThFSSu LAS MSP 00:40 A Sun Country 594 B737 M Su MZT MSP 03:49 A UPS 556 B757 M T 03:50 A UPS 1404 B757 M F 04:20 A UPS 556 B757 M TWThF 04:29 A UPS 558 B757 M TWThF 05:07 A Sun Country 430 B738 M M LAX MSP 05:10 A FedEx 1718 MD11 M MTWTh 05:14 A UPS 560 MD11 M TWThF 05:15 A Sun Country 398 B738 M M SFO MSP 05:25 D Delta 2130 B738 M MTThF MSP ATL 05:25 D Delta 2130 A319 M S MSP ATL 05:25 D Delta 2130 738 M W MSP ATL 05:25 D Delta 2130 MD90 M Su MSP ATL 05:35 D Continental 4698 E145 M MThF MSP EWR 05:39 A FedEx 1407 MD11 M MTWThF 05:45 D Airtran 215 B717 M MTWThFSSu MSP MKE RSW - 10 - Report Generated: 01/11/2012 18:42 January 2012 Nighttime Scheduled Carrier Jet Operations Flight Days of Time A/D Carrier Number Equipment Stage 3 Operation Routing 05:53 A UPS 496 B757 M S Report Generated: 01/11/2012 18:42 ---7 _11 - December 2011 Top 15 Actual Nighttime Jet Operators by Type 10:30 p.m. to 6:00 a.m. ** Airline ID Stage Type Count Airtran TRS 3 B717 18 Airtran TRS 3 B7377 27 America West AWE 3 A319 4 America West AWE 3 A320 18 America West AWE 3 A321 37 American AAL 3 B738 2 Total Nighttime Jet American AAL 3 MD80 28 Operations by Hour American Eagle EGF 3 CRJ7 25 Hour 1 Count Atlantic Southeast ASQ 3 CRJ7 2 2230 201 Atlantic Southeast ASQ 3 E145 28 2300 279 Compass CPZ 3 E170 23 2400 63 Delta DAL 3 A330 4 100 26 Delta DAL 3 B767 6 200 6 Delta DAL 3 MD80 12 300 19 Delta DAL 3 A319 15 400 75 Delta DAL 3 B757 28 500 276 Delta DAL 3 MD90 31 TOTAL 945 Delta DAL 3 A320 53 Delta DAL 3 B738 90 FedEx FDX 3 MD11 2 FedEx FDX 3 B757 13 FedEx FDX 3 B72Q 22 FedEx FDX 3 DC10 27 Mesaba MES 3 CRJ2 13 Mesaba MES 3 CRJ9 14 Pinnacle FLG 3 CRJ 1 Pinnacle FLG 3 CRJ2 45 Skywest Airlines SKW 3 CRJ 2 Skywest Airlines SKW 3 CRJ7 3 Skywest Airlines SKW 3 CRJ2 10 Southwest SWA 3 B735 2 Southwest SWA 3 B733 3 Southwest SWA 3 B7377 10 Sun Country SCX 3 B7377 59 Sun Country SCX 3 B738 131 UPS UPS 3 A300 6 UPS UPS 3 MD11 15 UPS UPS 3 B757 55 United UAL 3 A319 9 United UAL _ 3 A320 13 TOTAL 906 Note: top 15 nighttime operators represent 95.9% of the total nighttime canter jet operations. **Note: flight tracking data were unavailable between 12/27/11 at 9:53 a.m. and 12/28/11 at 7:42 a.m. 12 ' Report Generated: 01/11/2012 18:42 December 2011 Nighttime Carrier Jet Operations Mix for Top 15 Airlines 1 0:30 p.m to 6:00 a.m ** 140 i - -- ; DAL SCX 0 UPS ,, IF,itgata.MIVNINIEN-P" 120 ® . FOX ‘1110114111 0 AWE C 100 1' 0 FLG P 0 �''% AS4 ; .^ a �i 0 AAL I EL flit co a7 80 ' S ® PIES :_ EGF C4 ® s . t 60 ,, a✓ -_l a w - i- � ' s 0 UAL � - c "F E :n� Q SWA iiiKr 44 CL „ y ' SKW ty I t € €(I €•l irs = ao RN 1% le — Ulelit) ' \ !( € , i Zr 20 d � o in o IC) o u� o u� o W o �n o ICi o in o u� o in o u, o i a in o u� o u� c, v o to c- v o c-� v o co v 'F= r+ c� v o cr c� o .--� c- � v o M y e.j N N N N N co O O O O O O O O O O O O O O .0. O O O O O O O O O Time December 2011 Nighttime Carrier Stage Mix for Top 15 Airlines 10:30 p.m. to 6 Fleet :00 a.m Manufactured Airline Stage 2 Stage 3 Stage 3 Total Delta (DAL) 0 0 239 239 Jet Sun Country (SCX) 0 0 190 190 UPS (UPS) 0 0 76 76 FedEx (FDX) 0 22 42 64 America West (AWE) 0 0 59 59 Pinnacle (FLG) 0 0 46 46 Airtran (TRS) 0 0 45 45 Atlantic Southeast (ASQ) 0 0 30 30 American (AAL) 0 0 30 30 Mesaba (MES) 0 0 27 27 American Eagle (EGF) 0 0 25 25 Compass (CPZ) 0 0 23 23 United (UAL) 0 0 22 22 Southwest (SWA) 0 0 15 15 Skywest Airlines (SKW) 0 0 15 15 Other 0 2 37 39 Total 0 24 921 945 * *Note: flight tracking data were unavailable between 12/27/11 at 9:53 a.m. and 12/28/11 at 7:42 a.m. - 13 - Report Generated: 01/11/2012 18:42 D,9 Airport Noise and Operations Monitoring System Flight Tracks Carrier Jet Operations - December 2011 Dec 1 thru 8, 2011 - 4018 Carrier Jet Arrivals Dec 1 thru 8, 2011 - 4029 Carrie, r Jet Departures 7 ,,, -F (( �t.. ..r,— � l :i f a g y 1 '�iq ✓`�, F EF"IF' "' d 1 ° � ' h am � � U t'' - .� � f ff ti l p e _ - _ �, � � �N � 9 � -1t 1 �� y ,� I � /� - 1 1 )' , .,. ft 4 , , —.7, ,. ^. -,; ;-,,,,,. 1 � R y ip � s a+3 T r�Ti r� ' � _,,,, d s!lr i:. 41111115/1 r 3� , n F � w kit o �� aa j I > j aw � E ll ' r .. .:, �t f s ?q, X p- dt x �� :� i � €� � � h ,. G6 till: Iii` ) m Dec 1 thru 8, 2011 - 185 Nighttime Carrier Jet Arrivals Dec 1 thru 8, 2011 - 48 Nighttime Carrier Jet Departures ' \ `! ,.� _ f \ �. " -„e . ''`, -capon / I 4 . 4 'w*,, M I In ` - l s I p r g 3 : 1 , - . Q I PI R1 J"' V' lepPliiilligit./7740 ",.., 'It :'. Ig ; 4116 ' ',4 \ ' - °.‘,- 4 k.,.. „,,.... WO ii i ., !itil-',*.‘:' 4 -.NSW ' WIF ' 4111:*, „'„*: -, '.4 Z - ' ---7 ' . ' li i''' .6 "i' , I 4 k ii ik lir .,._' *,iii,:m.....r..,,,..........,....;;;;;:t6i,;;;;„,# ; ..ir 'II t 1111 11 '', . i-A-..02„41 ."'-' '''''' INV'', . 0, 414Z7111111 1 _..ii ' IA A' . 0 ' 1 ''' 't bn r ' ' t111 4 ))' '''"- f �\ '' ° Li Ill 6ikiii,,...-lac. s,,Aft.' .41r.g. A tt.,, , i , ,, -, .11tt .,, , ... / -; ' 4,... - 4 ' 7i '7,,,' ,, - . . ',II"— :� �'� " • =":.. . \ x^ � , /,y ! � t . "" "��♦ . e ®f. 3 alley ,R0 -emou t , it ,, te , 1 , 16..., ,,,,,w,_ _416 ' \ "� 44.4.6 Ilia owl& 14 Report Generated: 01/11/2012 18:42 Airport Noise and Operations Monitoring System Flight Tracks Carrier Jet Operations - December 2011 Dec 9 thru 16, 2011 - 3993 Carrier Jet Arrivals Dec 9 thru 16, 2011 - 4027 Carrier Jet Departures �� 4, _ , � . ✓ /� Ss r 1.4,. fr yA .'r I L ' y, y ■ i,, ∎ b,lNV �. r �y � ..,=-... . u �� ; .. ��kl t: - ✓ ice " s�*t i Fi RN- , , + ., Ir .-,,, 1 t r �' y - ... 4 ,41%4 ' ' ' , ' s"" le-"„'". -11C(I ," 1■1' 1 ' .".. I .4.4'4,f,ii*". '44,1, ''' ' - ,...rr( I I, ' - ...-'7 ✓ , ,..- - ,, — ,...,*, k 9 C7 ® 'e, � a ( \ \ �1 � � ti .� �✓ ''tip � ✓' '..' is �r �� to ��r� ✓ i -rte;.. _ ®* ,¢ , s �9i r we . .. . .. p a, . - ✓2.9 w trips "✓'' - Dec 9 thru 16, 2011 - 174 Nighttime Ca Jet Arriva Dec 9 thru 16, 2011 - 47 Nighttime Carrier Jet Departures - RV' ir.iimpe ..,„, "-, �� `\ airi....,„ • ,,,d \ --!,_ lif 147,... -r min p011 e t ►� w; �' , MM �k? i:, pit Klint ' * ... silkA: ; 4, 0 . ; Ai' , ,,\-- , , , R , NN p -ma 13 "414 r :. gy p .'. r. < - , - 9 `.. > �,. ' l r ig rr.a e p ,i, lir A k ...,, , 4 - -..,,,,;47■ - nth' r , 40 4 ",„,..f 4 7-1‘..."P % ' f ' ' -,„ •� I �tfj ' ' i \ NINI* .x.. ' 9ar1 t ��' : P'� � 7 �g �, gr i Nitt, 1 � 444 .,,L.s.,,,,„,,,..04,-0,,,,,...,,,....i.„..,,,,,..„.,,,-..,,,,,,,,41,,, .:, , _ : , ,,,,,, i ..„-N, . ,,,,,, xa a 4 � is 11114eloari; 1,, yet:* ..:. ,_--....... " t."21:rich.: '.11." , 17' °:: ''''' '--,..... 7..' ‘'4k ,. -in ~ 11 7 4'®® \ + ��'l . �� ` ': ; �'. � k - ' a L Elm vi Report Generated: 01/11/2012 18:42 ( - 15 - Airport Noise and Operations Monitoring System Flight Tracks Carrier Jet Operations - December 2011 Dec 17 thru 24, 2011 - 4146 Carrier Jet Arrivals Dec 17 thru 24, 2011 - 4154 Carrier Jet Departures �, �_ °- ��. �,... „�r"� a , ,rte ;�,� & a ■ � ' a � ice® \�✓ ....r.. � s ... ■� s affair- ° °sir - m t { E. '� 7 i ri �° ra r y , l d �i a r _ . J i t e • t om' \ t 1 �/ , 11 , 1 1 ' . °,. ,1�// gf/l i - , c,t I;,-, J ��aeE n +. 9 y" 1 . i1 11.\\ � � A .3 ms i $ i �� • �-� r_ _ __ ° r s e , foe... .��. ��Ir '',� € , s � i i ,... + weir '. , c s'. ` . .■ / ; wi ss� ey� 3 �9i'i T r y, x 9�� a I 4 ......1 r f =, ^- ti � �� lea V1101, �� _ –��t_ � ��d; ry� �� r �4'y t- 1 1 ! ir r :: Dec 17 thru 24, 2011 - 238 Nighttime Carrier Jet Arrivals Dec 17 thru 24, 2011 - 47 Nighttime Carrier Jet Departures et a � �� Y ,, i ii , -7...-Tsil poll _�•� P Icy it' ri IririA•4. . ,orr7 lApi z;.- , : 13.-Alitym,14 iw-fw-):ti. II "r. l �'� W. 1 , l M ® i • -7:1 " 'M ..._____,,..,,, „,-,:,, 7:.S."-s„ •,g,.',.;.----4 ir.1"------- - 4 0 "?,"' " f/ ,) , ‘ 14,Ale..-4;" , 411 1 '.. - ,. .-1; ' --:*''' 4111, ''''' r v. f i i e ..f i �.. r � -frbn' r i r �. 11 E tads- ,, r „- � <— w rmirre - 16 - 30 Report Generated: 01/11/2012 18:42 Airport Noise and Operations Monitoring System Fli T racks Carrier Jet Operations - December 0 11 Dec 25 thru 2 31, 2011 - 3072 Carrier Jet Arrivals Dec 25 thru 31, 2011 - 3055 Carrier Jet Departures . , ; 1 . 11 , - .. . , i ...,.... „ ,,,_ v 1,, 1 1 '.' • 1 \' �,1 i tit' � • ' J" i },I � I/ /✓ �'✓ .- ♦ mid � ✓ , I@ � l :' _ 't wad •` � > ;, ' 4,/ 2 .c � „-,,, . . _ 9 �� -i� / f ( 3 c `s ✓ ti p �i 9 !ail a + y � t / 1 C g ✓j '�h s ✓ y y ,✓�+ � ��,,✓ �� r1 ... ♦ ,i �.✓ hf° a c c 6✓ ° C w✓ Dec 25 thru 31, 2 Dec 25 thru 31, 2011 - 178 Nightt ime Carrier Jet Arrivals 011 - 28 Nighttime Carrier Jet Departures ,. 14 � � . �' � ` '� :� ' w I I( �t i . ,..,S1'", +ice ntii;111- 4..-%N'- - 1 3-' s '", 1,..,""riatav __.:--ti- :7- „ 1:),&„,"_, -,.t1'.!.-1.,',04 .01, \ po ‘11.1 �111in alp 1 � �.. , ik11,01%ft-.7"111g.' ._ ..----' ....‘,---7,-4,1,,i1.-nr.:,tita-.41 i A ,:„ 4,,,,, , 17' - m -- ' ON tizir ,a„_---_A,44 ..,—:.' ,,, I,: t &r ,,,i4-5, .,.4.4.,..,--4..., i I A ' rr.,- 1 ,,,, 4 is _ .,,,z... ,...4,m,30:74:1141.1, 1 , .,,, imi----- –AI e‘e--,- _ , -„,...,.,. , 1 . �4 , Y 1 t I n '' \� �, r ' Bloom , i i dr Nlt.t,ti,-, N totitk._ ► �► y I t a r E 1 � �� x.53 e �r �� / j � ,011101 i � ' � rnsvii� _ � i ce ' ° /� � i I� !' �� // � , � av * e ' e3i � '►t +w�� ' b y `.',. = =� 1. 1 � ' • ®� , 4S ef1lU fit " . `s�o� . . ._ Nom. sr ,, I� fi t ! ► � t►' •t/lll . f/ E. •,. rf. " - 17 Report Generated: 01/11/2012 18:42 33 MSP International Airport 6 „ ,,i "(11L'" a i'i i Remote Monitoring Tower (RMT) Site Locations ;.. 4111111111111111 '''''''' ' ''' \ '-' ' Nr4 , -.. '`' Imilei t Loci Parr -. St . if,44 , i f ‘ ' ,/ 44 / " ' � ,, MI eapois wg ' P t.' ' '''''''' i 0; '''' '‘' , 4,'' ' ''' : ' f,- , ,,,,, F ! / ' - \`‘...,‘ i o ( z 1 ,::;frodr, , ':iiili, 4 ' -41 1 u il ° . 1.,..,.1 „,,, r Lil 4 F N'Nk''' ■ Est St P t L - filo `� ,. . #h St. P II or . ' $ ' » ° t t. ., ,,. , , d ;',` 0 0 " Viti / ' ( . ‘ : T E r A RIVE -gin 4 - v il .,„,,i t ° , a F B rnsvrlle sa vage f ` Rosemount 11\a,,,:,,,, f'.:4411,,,....x.,' . Apple - �/alley� t. edit Riser Tw�°w r ..� T L akeville = Empire Twp. if ki 0 Remote Monitoring Tower 18 ..�/ 1, Report Generated: 01/11/2012 18:42 Time Above dB Threshold for Arrival Related Noise Events December 2011 RMT Time >= Time >= Time >= Time >_ ID City Address 65dB 80dB 90dB 100dB 1 Minneapolis Xerxes Ave. & 41st St. 08:46:39 00:00:21 00:00:00 00:00:00 2 Minneapolis Fremont Ave. & 43rd St. 10:30:45 00:03:05 00:00:00 00:00:00 3 Minneapolis West Elmwood St. & Belmont Ave. 12:36:24 00:13:00 00:00:00 00:00:00 4 Minneapolis Park Ave. & 48th St. 11:05:26 00:03:30 00:00:00 00:00:00 5 Minneapolis 12th Ave. & 58th St. 12:37:48 02:08:52 00:00:28 00:00:00 6 Minneapolis 25th Ave. & 57th St. 13:00:36 01:31:22 00:00:38 00:00:00 7 Richfield Wentworth Ave. & 64th St. 00:07:59 00:00:03 00:00:00 00:00:00 8 Minneapolis Longfellow Ave. & 43rd St. 00:12:12 00:00:04 00:00:00 00:00:00 9 St. Paul Saratoga St. & Hartford Ave. 00:33:39 00:02:37 00:00:00 00:00:00 10 St. Paul Itasca Ave. & Bowdoin St. 00:31:52 00:06:03 00:00:03 00:00:00 11 St. Paul Finn St. & Scheffer Ave. 00:01:18 00:00:00 00:00:00 00:00:00 12 St. Paul Alton St. & Rockwood Ave. 00:01:01 00:00:00 00:00:00 00:00:00 13 Mendota Heights Southeast end of Mohican Court 00:04:24 00:00:00 00:00:00 00:00:00 14 Eagan 1st St. & McKee St. 18:08:11 00:00:21 00:00:02 00:00:00 15 Mendota Heights Cullon St. & Lexington Ave. 00:15:29 00:00:15 00:00:00 00:00:00 16 Eagan Avalon Ave. & Vilas Ln. 17:56:15 00:20:47 00:00:04 00:00:00 17 Bloomington 84th St. & 4th Ave. 00:01:22 00:00:00 00:00:00 00:00:00 18 Richfield 75th St. & 17th Ave. 00:09:48 00:00:01 00:00:00 00:00:00 19 Bloomington 16th Ave. & 84th St. 00:08:26 00:00:08 00:00:00 00:00:00 20 Richfield 75th St. & 3rd Ave. 00:00:11 00:00:00 00:00:00 00:00:00 21 Inver Grove Heights Barbara Ave. & 67th St. 00:06:19 00:00:00 00:00:00 00:00:00 22 Inver Grove Heights Anne Marie Trail 10:45:56 00:00:00 00:00:00 00:00:00 23 Mendota Heights End of Kenndon Ave. 01:13:00 00:00:46 00:00:00 00:00:00 24 Eagan Chapel Ln. & Wren Ln. 19:36:36 00:00:39 00:00:00 00:00:00 25 Eagan Moonshine Park 1321 Jurdy Rd. 00:31:34 00:00:03 00:00:00 00:00:00 26 Inver Grove Heights 6796 Arkansas Ave. W. 00:50:36 00:00:14 00:00:00 00:00:00 27 Minneapolis Anthony School 5757 Irving Ave. S. 00:07:02 00:00:04 00:00:00 00:00:00 28 Richfield 6645 16th Ave. S. 01:02:52 00:00:14 00:00:00 00:00:00 29 Minneapolis Ericsson Elem. School 4315 31st Ave. S. 00:00:27 00:00:00 00:00:00 00:00:00 30 Bloomington 8715 River Ridge Rd. 02:39:55 00:00:03 00:00:00 00:00:00 31 Bloomington 9501 12th Ave. S. 00:00:20 00:00:00 00:00:00 00:00:00 32 Bloomington 10325 Pleasant Ave. S. 00:00:48 00:00:03 00:00:00 00:00:00 33 Burnsville North River Hills Park 00:01:34 00:00:00 00:00:00 00:00:00 34 Burnsville Red Oak Park 00:07:02 00:00:00 00:00:00 00:00:00 35 Eagan 2100 Garnet Ln. 06:40:37 00:00:42 00:00:00 00:00:00 36 Apple Valley Briar Oaks & Scout Pond 11:15:33 00:00:19 00:00:00 00:00:00 37 Eagan 4399 Woodgate Ln. N. 00:02:44 00:00:00 00:00:00 00:00:00 38 Eagan 3957 Turquoise Cir. 00:00:24 00:00:00 00:00:00 00:00:00 39 Eagan 3477 St. Charles PI. 00:00:09 00:00:00 00:00:00 00:00:00 Total Time for Arrival Noise Events 161:53:13 04:33:36 00:01:15 00:00:00 *Note: These time values and levels are based upon 1- second leq levels. Report Generated: 01/11/2012 18:42 � 5. - 19 Time Above Threshold dB for Departure Related Noise Events December 2011 RMT lime >= Time >= Time >= Time >= ID City Address 65dB 80dB 90dB 100dB 1 Minneapolis Xerxes Ave. & 41st St. 02:14:26 00:00:02 00:00:00 00:00:00 2 Minneapolis Fremont Ave. & 43rd St. 03:39:52 00:00:29 00:00:00 00:00:00 3 Minneapolis West Elmwood St. & Belmont Ave. 07:49:37 00:02:31 00:00:00 00:00:00 4 Minneapolis Park Ave. & 48th St. 10:15:50 00:08:24 00:00:00 00:00:00 5 Minneapolis 12th Ave. & 58th St. 36:34:51 01:30:45 00:04:16 00:00:00 6 Minneapolis 25th Ave. & 57th St. 42:47:48 03:51:21 00:15:26 00:00:12 7 Richfield Wentworth Ave. & 64th St. 22:43:52 00:22:35 00:00:00 00:00:00 8 Minneapolis Longfellow Ave. & 43rd St. 12:14:27 00:16:33 00:00:01 00:00:00 9 St. Paul Saratoga St. & Hartford Ave. 00:01:57 00:00:00 00:00:00 00:00:00 10 St. Paul Itasca Ave. & Bowdoin St. 00:00:58 00:00:00 00:00:00 00:00:00 11 St. Paul Finn St. & Scheffer Ave. 00:03:30 00:00:00 00:00:00 00:00:00 12 St. Paul Alton St. & Rockwood Ave. 00:01:31 00:00:00 00:00:00 00:00:00 13 Mendota Heights Southeast end of Mohican Court 04:28:49 00:01:45 00:00:00 00:00:00 14 Eagan 1st St. & McKee St. 04:03:10 00:06:00 00:00:00 00:00:00 15 Mendota Heights Cullon St. & Lexington Ave. 06:20:21 00:04:49 00:00:00 00:00:00 16 Eagan Avalon Ave. & Vilas Ln. 04:17:39 00:12:20 00:00:22 00:00:00 17 Bloomington 84th St. & 4th Ave. 00:12:35 00:00:05 00:00:00 00:00:00 18 Richfield 75th St. & 17th Ave. 09:09:26 00:05:13 00:00:04 00:00:00 19 Bloomington 16th Ave. & 84th St. 03:32:53 00:00:19 00:00:00 00:00:00 20 Richfield 75th St. & 3rd Ave. 00:26:40 00:00:02 00:00:00 00:00:00 21 Inver Grove Heights Barbara Ave. & 67th St. 01:00:42 00:00:15 00:00:00 00:00:00 22 Inver Grove Heights Anne Marie Trail 00:49:38 00:00:01 00:00:00 00:00:00 23 Mendota Heights End of Kenndon Ave. 10:03:08 00:24:31 00:00:27 00:00:00 24 Eagan Chapel Ln. & Wren Ln. 02:45:06 00:01:21 00:00:00 00:00:00 25 Eagan Moonshine Park 1321 Jurdy Rd. 05:44:03 00:00:01 00:00:00 00:00:00 26 Inver Grove Heights 6796 Arkansas Ave. W. 02:00:54 00:00:29 00:00:00 00:00:00 27 Minneapolis Anthony School 5757 Irving Ave. S. 11:10:30 00:07:13 00:00:00 00:00:00 28 Richfield 6645 16th Ave. S. 16:23:32 00:05:50 00:00:00 00:00:00 29 Minneapolis Ericsson Elem. School 4315 31st Ave. S. 06:08:52 00:02:20 00:00:00 00:00:00 30 Bloomington 8715 River Ridge Rd. 16:39:25 00:19:51 00:00:08 00:00:00 31 Bloomington 9501 12th Ave. S. 01:03:31 00:00:00 00:00:00 00:00:00 32 Bloomington 10325 Pleasant Ave. S. 00:22:48 00:00:00 00:00:00 00:00:00 33 Burnsville North River Hills Park 02:05:50 00:00:15 00:00:00 00:00:00 34 Burnsville Red Oak Park 00:40:51 00:00:16 00:00:00 00:00:00 35 Eagan 2100 Garnet Ln. 03:13:35 00:01:42 00:00:00 00:00:00 36 Apple Valley Briar Oaks & Scout Pond 01:03:44 00:00:08 00:00:00 00:00:00 37 Eagan 4399 Woodgate Ln. N. 01:41:58 00:00:45 00:00:00 00:00:00 38 Eagan 3957 Turquoise Cir. 03:05:46 00:03:39 00:00:00 00:00:00 39 Eagan 3477 St. Charles PI. 04:46:33 00:03:44 00:00:00 00:00:00 Total Time for Departure Noise Events 261:50:38 07:55:34 00:20:44 00:00:12 'Note: These time values and levels are based upon 1- second leq levels. - 20 - .5I n Report Generated: 01/11/2012 18:42 Arrival Related Noise Events December 2011 Arrival Arrival Arrival - Arrival RMT Events >= Events >= Events >= Events >_ ID Cit Address 65dB 80dB 90dB 100dB 1 Minneapolis Xerxes Ave. & 41st St. 2426 7 0 0 2 Minneapolis Fremont Ave. & 43rd St. 2406 54 0 0 3 Minneapolis West Elmwood St. & Belmont Ave. 2558 223 0 0 4 Minneapolis Park Ave. & 48th St. 2564 64 0 0 5 Minneapolis 12th Ave. & 58th St. 2637 1796 13 0 6 Minneapolis 25th Ave. & 57th St. 2670 1787 18 0 7 Richfield Wentworth Ave. & 64th St. 37 2 0 8 Minneapolis Longfellow Ave. & 43rd St. 53 1 0 0 9 St. Paul Saratoga St. & Hartford Ave. 99 35 0 0 10 St. Paul Itasca Ave. & Bowdoin St. 103 86 1 0 11 St. Paul Finn St. & Scheffer Ave. 6 0 0 0 12 St. Paul Alton St. & Rockwood Ave. 5 0 0 0 13 Mendota Heights Southeast end of Mohican Court 20 0 0 0 14 Eagan 1st St. & McKee St. 4505 9 1 0 15 Mendota Heights Cullon St. & Lexington Ave. 64 4 0 0 16 Eagan Avalon Ave. & Vilas Ln. 3860 322 2 0 17 Bloomington 84th St. & 4th Ave. 7 0 0 0 18 Richfield 75th St. & 17th Ave. 58 2 0 0 19 Bloomington 16th Ave. & 84th St. 3 3 0 0 20 Richfield 75th St. & 3rd Ave. 2 0 0 0 21 Inver Grove Heights Barbara Ave. & 67th St. 27 1 0 0 22 Inver Grove Heights Anne Marie Trail 2718 0 0 0 23 Mendota Heights End of Kenndon Ave. 327 10 0 0 24 Eagan Chapel Ln. & Wren Ln. 4675 20 0 0 25 Eagan Moonshine Park 1321 Jurdy Rd. 155 1 0 0 26 Inver Grove Heights 6796 Arkansas Ave. W. 234 4 0 0 27 Minneapolis Anthony School 5757 Irving Ave. S. 31 1 0 0 28 Richfield 6645 16th Ave. S. 259 6 0 0 29 Minneapolis Ericsson Elem. School 4315 31st Ave. S. 2 0 0 0 30 Bloomington 8715 River Ridge Rd. 835 1 0 0 31 Bloomington 9501 12th Ave. S. 2 0 0 0 32 Bloomington 10325 Pleasant Ave. S. 5 1 0 0 33 Burnsville North River Hills Park 9 0 0 0 34 Burnsville Red Oak Park 43 0 0 0 35 Eagan 2100 Garnet Ln. 1830 10 0 0 36 Apple Valley Briar Oaks & Scout Pond 2435 7 0 0 37 Eagan 4399 Woodgate Ln. N. 15 0 0 0 38 Eagan 3957 Turquoise Cir. 2 0 0 0 39 Eagan 3477 St. Charles PI. 1 0 0 0 Total Arrival Noise Events 37720 4457 - 35 0 *Note: These counts are based upon Lmax. Report Generated: 01/11/2012 18:42 3-7 - 21 - Departure Related Noise Events December 2011 Departure Departure Departure Departure RMT Events >= Events >= Events >= Events >_ ID City Address 65dB 80dB 90dB 100dB 1 Minneapolis Xerxes Ave. & 41st St. 527 2 0 0 2 Minneapolis Fremont Ave. & 43rd St. 767 4 0 0 3 Minneapolis West Elmwood St. & Belmont Ave. 1605 38 0 0 4 Minneapolis Park Ave. & 48th St. 1973 113 0 0 5 Minneapolis 12th Ave. & 58th St. 5870 835 73 0 6 Minneapolis 25th Ave. & 57th St. 7233 2057 155 6 7 Richfield Wentworth Ave. & 64th St. 3861 197 0 0 8 Minneapolis Longfellow Ave. & 43rd St. 2234 118 1 0 9 St. Paul Saratoga St. & Hartford Ave. 9 0 0 0 10 St. Paul Itasca Ave. & Bowdoin St. 4 0 0 0 11 St. Paul Finn St. & Scheffer Ave. 11 0 0 0 12 St. Paul Alton St. & Rockwood Ave. 7 0 0 0 13 Mendota Heights Southeast end of Mohican Court 925 18 0 0 14 Eagan 1st St. & McKee St. 739 60 0 0 15 Mendota Heights Cullon St. & Lexington Ave. 1241 73 0 0 16 Eagan Avalon Ave. & Vilas Ln. 726 101 6 0 17 Bloomington 84th St. & 4th Ave. 46 1 0 0 18 Richfield 75th St. & 17th Ave. 2200 64 1 0 19 Bloomington 16th Ave. & 84th St. 837 13 0 0 20 Richfield 75th St. & 3rd Ave. 100 1 0 0 21 Inver Grove Heights Barbara Ave. & 67th St. 254 5 0 0 22 Inver Grove Heights Anne Marie Trail 179 1 0 0 23 Mendota Heights End of Kenndon Ave. 1737 322 7 0 24 Eagan Chapel Ln. & Wren Ln. 536 22 0 0 25 Eagan Moonshine Park 1321 Jurdy Rd. 907 1 0 0 26 Inver Grove Heights 6796 Arkansas Ave. W. 482 6 0 0 27 Minneapolis Anthony School 5757 Irving Ave. S. 2351 82 0 0 28 Richfield 6645 16th Ave. S. 3375 82 0 0 29 Minneapolis Ericsson Elem. School 4315 31st Ave. S. 1194 35 0 0 30 Bloomington 8715 River Ridge Rd. 2737 150 2 0 31 Bloomington 9501 12th Ave. S. 255 0 0 0 32 Bloomington 10325 Pleasant Ave. S. 95 0 0 0 33 Burnsville North River Hills Park 464 4 0 0 34 Burnsville Red Oak Park 154 3 0 0 35 Eagan 2100 Garnet Ln. 647 26 0 0 36 Apple Valley Briar Oaks & Scout Pond 245 3 0 0 37 Eagan 4399 Woodgate Ln. N. 362 7 0 0 38 Eagan 3957 Turquoise Cir. 616 29 0 0 39 Eagan 3477 St. Charles PI. 995 39 0 0 Total Departure Noise Events 48500 4512 245 6 *Note: These counts are based upon Lmax. - 22 - 3g Report Generated: 01/11/2012 18:42 Top Ten Loudest Aircraft Noise Events for MSP December 2011 (RMT Site #1) Xerxes Ave. & 41st St., Minneapolis Date/Time Flight Number Aircraft Type Arrival/ Runway Lmax(dB) Departure 12/20/2011 11:50 TCF3516 E170 A 12R 83.8 12/28/2011 12:07 CPZ5781 E170 A 12L 82.7 12/20/2011 10:01 MES2558 CRJ9 A 12R 82.1 12/28/2011 12:02 ASA36 B739 A 12R 82 12/14/2011 5:13 UPS560 MD11 A 12R 81.1 12/11/2011 11:18 DAL622 B777 A 12R 80.9 12/08/2011 19:44 ADB2632 Al24 D 30L 80.9 12/02/2011 16:30 AAL2043 MD80 A 12R 80.4 12/17/2011 13:39 DAL621 B777 D 30L 80.3 12/13/2011 12:13 FLG4114 CRJ2 A 12L 79.8 (RMT Site #2) Fremont Ave. & 43rd St., Minneapolis DateTme Flight Number Aircraft Type Arrival/ Runway Lmax(dB) Departure 12/08/2011 19:44 ADB2632 Al24 D 30L 89.4 12/13/2011 15:45 DAL1778 DC9Q A 12L 86.5 12/31/2011 12:17 DAL1230 MD80 A 12L 86.4 12/31/2011 7:58 DAL945 DC9Q A 12L 86 12/31/2011 9:57 DAL2119 MD80 A 12L 85.5 12/29/2011 7:31 MES2479 CRJ9 D 30L 85.1 12/02/2011 12:06 Unknown UKN A 12L 84.7 12/11/2011 14:36 DAL1476 DC9Q A 12L 84.3 12/02/2011 19:35 Unknown UKN A 12L 83.9 12/07/2011 21:50 DAL2232 DC9Q D 30R 83.3 (RMT Site #3) West Elmwood St. & Belmont Ave., Minneapolis DateTme Flight Number Aircraft Type Arrival/ Runway Lmax(dB) Departure 12/14/2011 4:14 FDX2737 B72Q A 12R 89.6 12/08/2011 19:43 ADB2632 Al24 D 30L 89.3 12/20/2011 17:33 CKS2560 B742 A 12R 88.9 12/13/2011 20:54 DAL2019 MD80 A 12R 86.7 12/12/2011 22:53 Unknown UKN A 12R 86.5 12/28/2011 10:30 VNR156 P180 A 12R 86.5 12/14/2011 8:55 DAL340 MD80 A 12R 86.5 12/12/2011 14:28 DAL1476 DC9Q A 12R 86.1 12/05/2011 10:02 VDA2650 Al24 D 30L 86 12/11/2011 20:18 AAL1344 MD80 A 12R 86 Report Generated: 01/11/2012 18:42 35 - 23 - Top Ten Loudest Aircraft Noise Events for MSP December 2011 (RMT Site#4) Park Ave. & 48th St., Minneapolis Date /me Flight Number Aircraft Type Arrival/ Runway Lmax(dB) Departure 12/22/2011 10:07 DAL2198 MD80 D 30R 89 12/21/2011 11:49 DAL1734 DC9Q D 30L 88.5 12/22/2011 7:23 DAL1996 MD80 D 30R 88 12/02/2011 19:11 DAL1732 DC9Q A 12L 88 12/21/2011 8:43 DAL2198 MD80 D 30R 87.5 12/29/2011 8:41 DAL2198 MD80 D 30L 87.4 12/09/2011 14:38 DAL883 DC9Q D 30L 86.6 12/11/2011 16:43 AAL2043 MD80 A 12L 86.4 12/03/2011 10:25 DAL818 MD80 D 30L 86.4 12/30/2011 19:10 AAL1235 MD80 D 30R 86 (RMT Site #5) 12th Ave. & 58th St., Minneapolis Date/Time Flight Number Aircraft Type Arrival/ Runway Lmax(dB) Departure 12/04/2011 14:18 DAL883 DC9Q D 30L 97 12/16/2011 11:15 DAL2330 DC9Q D 30L 96.6 12/21/2011 11:49 DAL1734 DC9Q D 30L 96.5 12/15/2011 15:58 DAL907 DC9Q D 30L 95 12/25/2011 13:35 DAL785 MD80 D 30L 94.6 12/21/2011 9:11 FDX800 B72Q D 30L 94.4 12/03/2011 13:39 DAL785 MD80 D 30L 94.3 12/27/2011 5:35 DAL2129 MD80 D 30L 94 12/28/2011 16:25 UPS2560 MD11 A 12R 93.8 12/16/2011 11:44 DAL66 MD80 D 30L 93.5 (RMT Site #6) 25th Ave. & 57th St., Minneapolis Date/Time Flight Number Aircraft Type Arrival/ Runway Lmax(dB) Departure 12/03/2011 14:01 DAL883 DC9Q D 30R 102.5 12/29/2011 11:57 DAL1734 DC9Q D 30R 101.6 12/21/2011 18:24 DAL887 DC9Q D 30R 100.9 12/22/2011 17:43 DAL887 DC9Q D 30R 100.9 12/17/2011 14:04 DAL883 DC9Q D 30R 100.8 12/26/2011 18:03 DAL887 DC9Q D 30R 100.5 12/17/2011 10:37 DAL881 DC9Q D 30R 99.7 12/30/2011 17:42 DAL887 DC9Q D 30R 99.2 12/23/2011 12:30 DAL1734 DC9Q D 30R 98.9 12/22/2011 11:54 DAL1734 DC9Q D 30R 98.9 24 L}{ 1 Report Generated: 01/11/2012 18:42 Top Ten Loudest Aircraft Noise Events for MSP December 2011 (RMT Site #7) Wentworth Ave. & 64th St., Richfield DateTme Flight Number Aircraft Type Arrival/ Runway Lmax(dB) Departure 12/15/2011 14:19 AAL1355 MD80 D 30L 89.6 12/29/2011 12:15 DAL66 MD80 D 30L 89.4 12/01/2011 9:07 AAL1125 MD80 D 30L 89 12/21/2011 16:07 DAL789 MD80 D 30L 88.7 12/29/2011 19:46 AAL375 MD80 D 30L 88.7 12/21/2011 14:14 AAL1355 MD80 D 30L 88.7 12/19/2011 10:39 AAL1683 MD80 D 30L 88.6 12/21/2011 9:12 FDX800 B72Q D 30L 88.6 12/30/2011 11:48 DAL66 MD80 D 30L 88.3 12/01/2011 10:43 AAL1683 MD80 D 30L 88.1 (RMT Site #8) Longfellow Ave. & 43rd St., Minneapolis Date/Time Flight Number Aircraft Type Arrival/ Runway Lmax(dB) Departure 12/17/2011 14:04 DAL883 DC9Q D 30R 90.3 12/06/2011 11:02 DAL2096 MD80 D 30R 89.2 12/30/2011 14:02 DAL883 MD80 D 30R 89 12/23/2011 21:46 DAL570 MD80 D 30L 88.9 12/25/2011 13:23 DAL1864 MD80 D 30R 88.6 12/05/2011 10:48 DAL2096 MD80 D 30R 88.5 12/25/2011 10:23 DAL818 MD80 D 30R 88.4 12/05/2011 10:33 DAL818 MD80 D 30R 87.8 12/09/2011 10:15 DAL2096 MD80 D 30R 87.8 12/29/2011 7:25 DAL1996 MD80 D 30R 87.8 (RMT Site #9) Saratoga St. & Hartford Ave., St. Paul DateTme Flight Number Aircraft Type Arrival/ Runway Lmax(dB) Departure 12/26/2011 12:39 AAL450 MD80 A 22 89.5 12/26/2011 12:03 DAL2319 MD80 A 22 88.4 12/26/2011 12:44 DAL2393 MD80 A 22 86.1 12/26/2011 13:43 DAL259 A330 A 22 84.5 12/26/2011 12:42 SCX242 B738 A 22 84.1 12/26/2011 11:45 EGF3624 CRJ7 A 22 83.1 12/26/2011 12:46 DAL2374 B757 A 22 83.1 12/26/2011 12:21 DAL2314 B757 A 22 83 12/26/2011 12:02 DAL1212 B757 A 22 83 12/26/2011 13:49 DAL2219 MD80 A 22 82.8 Report Generated: 01/11/2012 18:42 41 - 25 - Top Ten Loudest Aircraft Noise Events for MSP December 2011 (RMT Site #10) Itasca Ave. & Bowdoin St., St. Paul Datefine Flight Number Aircraft Type Arrival! Runway Lmax(dB) Departure 12/26/2011 13:44 DAL259 A330 A 22 91.5 12/26/2011 13:50 DAL2219 MD80 A 22 89 12/26/2011 12:22 DAL2314 B757 A 22 88 12/26/201112:47 DAL2374 B757 A 22 87.8 12/26/2011 13:32 DAL219 B767 A 22 87.6 12/26/2011 13:30 TCF5987 E170 A 22 87.3 12/26/2011 14:31 DAL2214 B757 A 22 87 12/26/2011 14:34 CPZ5722 E170 A 22 86.8 12/26/2011 13:42 DAL2085 A320 A 22 86.7 12/26/2011 12:03 DAL1212 B757 A 22 86.3 (RMT Site #11) Finn St. & Scheffer Ave., St. Paul Date/Time Flight Number Aircraft Type Arrival/ Runway Lmax(dB) Departure 12/25/2011 11:06 TCF3540 E170 D 30R 76.9 12/10/2011 12:48 AWE1839 A319 A 12L 75 12/20/2011 7:37 BMJ48 BE65 D 30R 74.5 12/26/2011 13:43 DAL259 A330 A 22 74.1 12/25/2011 17:03 TCF3450 E170 D 30R 73.8 12/08/2011 6:49 BMJ48 BE65 D 30R 73.5 12/25/2011 6:15 UAL520 B757 D 30R 73.2 12/16/2011 13:56 N414TD C414 D 30R 71.7 12/10/2011 14:30 SKW6492 CRJ7 A 12L 71.4 12/10/2011 13:35 CPZ5684 E170 A 12L 70.7 (RMT Site #12) Alton St. & Rockwood Ave., St. Paul Date/Time Flight Number Aircraft Type Arrival/ Runway Lmax(dB) Departure 12/30/2011 6:46 BMJ62 BE65 D 12L 72.7 12/15/2011 13:01 CPZ5795 E170 A 30R 72.2 12/14/2011 6:47 BMJ52 BE99 D 12R 71.9 12/08/2011 14:58 Unknown UKN A 30R 69.3 12/30/2011 6:47 BMJ70 BE65 D 12L 69.2 12/30/2011 14:26 TCF3516 E170 D 30R 68.1 12/11/2011 15:13 N8195U PASE D 12L 67.9 12/08/2011 14:58 Unknown UKN A 30R 67.6 12/30/2011 14:26 TCF3516 E170 D 30R 67.4 12/06/2011 17:27 TRS871 B7377 A 12L 67.4 26 - / I.- Report Generated: 01/11/2012 18:42 Top Ten Loudest Aircraft Noise Events for MSP December 2011 (RMT Site #13) Southeast end of Mohican Court, Mendota Heights Daterme Flight Number Aircraft Type Arrival/ Runway Lmax(dB) Departure 12/18/2011 10:23 DAL818 MD80 D 12L 86.9 12/22/2011 22:20 FDX2833 B72Q D 12R 86.5 12/26/2011 7:20 DAL1996 MD80 D 12L 85.6 12/31/2011 10:29 DAL818 MD80 D 12L 85.5 12/20/2011 10:24 DAL818 MD80 D 12L 85.2 12/11/2011 10:27 DAL818 MD80 D 12L 84.1 12/18/2011 5:41 DAL2129 MD80 D 12R 82.8 12/02/2011 10:30 DAL818 MD80 D 12L 82.8 12/12/2011 10:23 DAL818 MD80 D 12L 82.7 12/28/2011 10:32 DAL818 MD80 D 12R 82.1 (RMT Site #14) 1st St. & McKee St., Eagan Date/Time Flight Number Aircraft Type Arrival/ Runway Lmax(dB) Departure 12/30/2011 11:53 DAL1212 B757 A 30L 93.4 12/14/2011 12:01 DAL1734 MD80 D 12L 89.5 12/23/2011 11:57 SKW4529 CRJ2 A 30L 88.1 12/13/2011 2:04 Unknown UKN D 12R 87.1 12/30/2011 5:50 DAL2129 MD80 D 12R 87 12/20/2011 11:54 DAL1734 DC9Q D 12R 86.5 12/28/2011 21:39 DAL570 MD80 D 12R 86.4 12/14/2011 8:37 AAL1125 MD80 D 12R 86.3 12/31/2011 8:44 DAL2198 MD80 D 12R 85.3 12/19/2011 22:24 FDX2833 B72Q D 12R 84.9 (RMT Site #15) Culion St. & Lexington Ave., Mendota Heights Daterme Flight Number Aircraft Type Arrival/ Runway Lmax(dB) Departure 12/02/2011 10:29 DAL818 MD80 D 12L 88.8 12/10/2011 10:27 DAL818 MD80 D 12L 88.3 12/20/2011 10:24 DAL818 MD80 D 12L 87.4 12/12/2011 12:51 Unknown UKN D 12L 85.6 12/12/2011 17:49 Unknown UKN D 12L 85.6 12/18/2011 10:23 DAL818 MD80 D 12L 85.3 12/26/2011 7:20 DAL1996 MD80 D 12L 85 12/12/2011 17:57 Unknown UKN D 12L 85 12/12/2011 10:23 DAL818 MD80 D 12L 83.9 12/11/2011 10:27 DAL818 MD80 D 12L 83.5 Report Generated: 01/11/2012 18:42 43 -27 - Top Ten Loudest Aircraft Noise Events for MSP December 2011 (RMT Site #16) Avalon Ave. & Vilas Ln., Eagan Datelme Flight Number Aircraft Type Arrival/ Runway Lmax(dB) Departure 12/14/2011 14:24 DAL883 DC9Q D 12R 96.3 12/16/2011 21:48 DAL570 DC9Q D 12R 91.4 12/23/2011 10:50 BMJ59 BE65 A 30L 91.1 12/02/2011 15:08 Unknown UKN D 12R 91.1 12/19/2011 22:24 FDX2833 B72Q D 12R 90.5 12/14/2011 14:20 AAL1355 MD80 D 12R 90.3 12/18/2011 17:33 DAL41 B767 A 30L 90.1 12/19/2011 21:46 DAL570 MD80 D 12R 90 12/02/2011 11:45 DAL66 MD80 D 12R 89.8 12/31/2011 5:36 DAL2129 MD80 D 12R 89.1 (RMT Site #17) 84th St. & 4th Ave., Bloomington Date/Time Flight Number Aircraft Type Arrival/ Runway Lmax(dB) Departure 12/26/2011 13:58 DAL621 A330 D 22 83 12/23/2011 13:20 CPZ5790 E170 D 30L 77.9 12/23/2011 12:32 AWE979 A320 D 30L 77.8 12/02/2011 6:52 EGF4590 CRJ7 D 30R 77.6 12/21/2011 5:48 BMG59 BE65 D 17 76.5 12/08/2011 21:26 BMJ61 BE65 A 04 76.1 12/23/2011 11:16 BYA373 SW4 D 17 76 12/29/2011 5:35 DAL2129 MD80 D 30L 75.7 12/26/2011 15:08 AWE6 A320 D 22 75.7 12/24/2011 14:40 MES2580 CRJ9 D 30R 74.9 (RMT Site #18) 75th St. & 17th Ave., Richfield Datemme Flight Number Aircraft Type Arrival/ Runway Lmax(dB) Departure 12/26/2011 13:58 DAL621 A330 D 22 91.7 12/02/2011 18:21 DAL887 DC9Q D 17 86.4 12/11/2011 13:36 DAL1667 DC9Q D 17 85.9 12/11/2011 15:35 DAL789 MD80 D 17 85.6 12/18/2011 10:44 DAL9932 DC9Q D 17 85.5 12/13/2011 19:44 FDX968 B72Q D 17 85 12/31/2011 13:38 DAL785 MD80 D 17 84.8 12/13/2011 10:05 DAL2096 MD80 D 17 84.5 12/12/2011 10:23 DAL2096 MD80 D 17 84 12/13/2011 15:43 DAL1307 MD80 D 17 83.9 28 Report Generated: 01/11/2012 18:42 Top Ten Loudest Aircraft Noise Events for MSP December 2011 (RMT Site #19) 16th Ave. & 84th St., Bloomington Daterme Flight Number Aircraft Type Arrival/ Runway Lmax(dB) Departure 12/26/2011 7:17 N253CM GLF5 D 17 85.8 12/26/2011 10:22 CPZ5806 E170 D 17 83.8 12/22/2011 13:26 DAL1608 A320 A 35 82.2 12/19/2011 9:17 DAL1440 A320 A 35 82.1 12/12/2011 7:07 DAL1714 DC9Q D 17 82 12/23/2011 8:15 BMJ59 BE65 D 17 81.4 12/23/2011 12:09 DAL411 A320 D 17 81.3 12/31/2011 10:32 DAL881 DC9Q D 17 81.2 12/18/2011 21:58 MES2599 CRJ2 D 17 81.1 12/12/2011 12:04 DAL66 MD80 D 17 81 (RMT Site #20) 75th St. & 3rd Ave., Richfield Date/Time Flight Number Aircraft Type Arrival/ Runway Lmax(dB) Departure 12/27/2011 6:15 BMJ64 BE65 D 30L 81.1 12/01/2011 7:59 DAL1456 A319 D 30L 79.6 12/01/2011 7:43 FDX800 B72Q D 30L 78.3 12/26/2011 13:58 DAL621 A330 D 22 77.7 12/29/2011 5:35 DAL2129 MD80 D 30L 77.4 12/24/2011 11:03 DAL519 A320 D 30L 77.3 12/24/2011 6:13 SCX725 B738 D 30L 77.3 12/25/2011 8:52 AAL1125 MD80 D 30L 77.1 12/21/2011 6:53 DAL1981 A320 D 30L 77 12/23/2011 12:31 AWE979 A320 D 30L 76.9 (RMT Site #21) Barbara Ave. & 67th St., Inver Grove Heights Date/Time Flight Number Aircraft Type Arrival/ Runway Lmax(dB) Departure 12/02/2011 13:39 MES2425 CRJ2 D 12L 89.4 12/28/2011 10:32 DAL818 MD80 D 12R 82.7 12/19/2011 22:26 FDX2833 B72Q D 12R 81.2 12/11/2011 13:41 DAL621 B777 D 12R 80.9 12/30/2011 10:30 DAL818 MD80 D 12L 80 12/07/2011 13:02 CPZ5795 E170 A 30R 80 12/18/2011 22:37 SWA3391 B733 A 30L 79.7 12/26/2011 10:31 DAL818 MD80 D 12R 79.3 12/02/2011 11:58 FLG4079 CRJ2 D 12L 79.3 12/14/2011 8:44 DAL2198 MD80 D 12R 78.6 Report Generated: 01/11/2012 18:42 ./ - 29 Top Ten Loudest Aircraft Noise Events for MSP December 2011 (RMT Site #22) Anne Marie Trail, Inver Grove Heights Date/Time Flight Number Aircraft Type Arrival/ Runway Lmax(dB) Departure 12/28/2011 21:40 DAL570 MD80 D 12R 80.2 12/04/2011 9:57 DAL2063 MD90 A 30L 79.7 12/14/2011 12:02 DAL1734 MD80 D 12L 78.9 12/21/2011 12:03 SKW4457 CRJ2 A 30R 78.5 12/21/2011 19:57 DAL9945 A330 A 30L 78.5 12/15/2011 3:50 FDX2737 B72Q A 30L 78.1 12/04/2011 9:55 DAL1133 A319 A 30L 77.7 12/14/2011 14:25 DAL883 DC9Q D 12R 77.7 12/13/2011 15:51 DAL907 DC9Q D 12R 77.7 12/23/2011 10:59 DAL2119 MD80 A 30L 77.5 (RMT Site #23) End of Kenndon Ave., Mendota Heights Date/Time Flight Number Aircraft Type Arrival/ Runway Lmax(dB) Departure 12/12/2011 21:37 DAL2232 DC9Q D 12L 93.5 12/26/2011 7:20 DAL1996 MD80 D 12L 92.4 12/02/2011 10:29 DAL818 MD80 D 12L 91.8 12/18/2011 10:23 DAL818 MD80 D 12L 91.7 12/20/2011 10:24 DAL818 MD80 D 12L 91.7 12/11/2011 19:49 DAL1075 DC9Q D 12L 90.3 12/10/2011 21:55 DAL2232 DC9Q D 12L 90.1 12/30/2011 10:29 DAL818 MD80 D 12L 89.9 12/10/2011 10:27 DAL818 MD80 D 12L 89.7 12/30/2011 21:38 DAL570 DC9Q D 12L 89.2 (RMT Site #24) Chapel Ln. & Wren Ln., Eagan Date/Time Flight Number Aircraft Type Arrival/ Runway Lmax(dB) Departure 12/01/2011 10:31 FLG4367 CRJ2 A 30R 88.5 12/14/2011 12:01 DAL1734 MD80 D 12L 85.6 12/28/2011 21:40 DAL570 MD80 D 12R 85.3 12/07/2011 20:51 DAL1055 MD80 A 30L 82.8 12/14/2011 9:07 DAL1714 DC9Q D 12R 82.8 12/15/2011 3:51 FDX2737 B72Q A 30L 82.8 12/14/2011 19:36 FLG4002 CRJ2 A 30R 82.7 12/03/2011 18:17 DAL2134 MD90 A 30L 82.5 12/30/2011 5:51 DAL2129 MD80 D 12R 82.3 12/22/2011 21:49 DAL570 MD80 D 12L 82.3 30 - 4-te Report Generated: 01/11/2012 18:42 Top Ten Loudest Aircraft Noise Events for MSP December 2011 (RMT Site #25) Moonshine Park 1321 Jurdy Rd., Eagan Date/Time Flight Number Aircraft Type Arrival/ Runway Lmax(dB) Departure 12/15/2011 7:46 ASQ5498 CRJ9 A 30L 82.9 12/14/2011 14:24 DAL883 DC9Q D 12R 80.5 12/14/2011 17:54 DAL821 A320 D 12R 79.7 12/12/2011 15:34 AAL1046 B738 A 30L 79.6 12/11/2011 10:11 DAL881 A320 D 17 79.4 12/01/2011 16:16 DAL931 MD90 A 30L 79.3 12/27/2011 7:25 MES2409 CRJ9 A 30L 79.1 12/21/2011 18:05 CKS2560 B742 A 30L 78.8 12/21/2011 15:53 N790JC F900 A 30L 78.7 12/19/2011 21:46 DAL570 MD80 D 12R 78.6 (RMT Site #26) 6796 Arkansas Ave. W., Inver Grove Heights Date/Time Flight Number Aircraft Type Arrival/ Runway Lmax(dB) Departure 12/01/2011 9:04 SKW4646 CRJ9 A 30R 86.8 12/11/2011 13:41 DAL621 B777 D 12R 82.3 12/15/2011 13:40 EGF4591 CRJ7 A 30R 81.9 12/20/2011 22:32 FDX968 B72Q D 12R 81.8 12/30/2011 10:30 DAL818 MD80 D 12L 81.5 12/28/2011 8:46 DAL2198 MD80 D 12R 81 12/06/2011 8:15 CPZ5784 E170 A 30R 80.9 12/14/2011 14:01 DAL621 B777 D 12R 80.9 12/10/2011 16:30 DAL220 B767 D 12R 80.2 12/07/2011 10:35 DAL622 B777 A 30L 80 (RMT Site #27) Anthony School 5757 Irving Ave. S., Minneapolis DateTme Flight Number Aircraft Type Arrival/ Runway Lmax(dB) Departure 12/09/2011 7:14 DAL1714 DC9Q D 30L 88.3 12/25/2011 13:36 DAL785 MD80 D 30L 87.1 12/06/2011 13:40 DAL785 MD80 D 30L 87 12/21/2011 22:27 FDX2833 B72Q D 30L 87 12/20/2011 7:23 AAL1391 MD80 D 30L 86.7 12/21/2011 13:39 DAL785 MD80 D 30L 86.7 12/21/2011 10:42 AAL1683 MD80 D 30L 86.7 12/27/2011 5:36 DAL2129 MD80 D 30L 86.1 12/25/2011 17:21 DAL1799 MD80 D 30L 86.1 12/16/2011 11:44 DAL66 MD80 D 30L 85.9 Report Generated: 01/11/2012 18:42 - 31 - Top Ten Loudest Aircraft Noise Events for MSP December 2011 (RMT Site #28) 6645 16th Ave. S., Richfield Date /me Flight Number Aircraft Type Arrival/ Runway Lmax(dB) Departure 12/01/2011 7:26 DAL1714 DC9Q D 30L 88.8 12/15/2011 8:27 DAL1714 DC9Q D 30L 87.6 12/22/2011 9:13 CKS2557 B742 D 30L 85.7 12/31/2011 10:32 DAL881 DC9Q D 17 85.5 12/31/2011 7:20 DAL1996 MD80 D 17 85.3 12/14/2011 7:24 AAL1391 MD80 D 17 85.3 12/28/2011 14:41 CPZ5768 E170 D 17 84.6 12/04/2011 15:42 DAL789 MD80 D 30L 84.4 12/27/2011 6:14 BMJ64 BE65 D 30L 84.3 12/13/2011 13:36 DAL785 MD80 D 17 84.2 (RMT Site #29) Ericsson Elem. School 4315 31st Ave. S., Minneapolis Date/Time Flight Number Aircraft Type Arrival/ Runway Lmax(dB) Departure 12/26/2011 18:09 AAL1235 MD80 D 30R 87.8 12/15/2011 11:52 DAL1734 MD80 D 30R 87.1 12/23/2011 10:59 DAL818 MD80 D 30R 85.8 12/03/2011 20:13 DAL2170 MD80 D 30R 84.3 12/08/2011 7:04 DAL1996 MD80 D 30R 84 12/07/2011 18:00 AAL1235 MD80 D 30R 83.2 12/29/2011 6:37 BMJ54 BE65 D 30R 83.1 12/04/2011 17:43 DAL2296 MD80 D 30R 83 12/06/2011 7:06 DAL1996 MD80 D 30R 82.9 12/07/2011 17:59 AAL1235 MD80 D 30R 82.9 (RMT Site #30) 8715 River Ridge Rd., Bloomington Date/Time Flight Number Aircraft Type Arrival/ Runway Lmax(dB) Departure 12/13/2011 11:20 DAL2330 DC9Q D 17 91.7 12/31/2011 17:47 DAL1517 DC9Q D 17 91.3 12/14/2011 17:22 DAL907 DC9Q D 17 89.8 12/13/2011 11:40 DAL66 MD80 D 17 89.8 12/14/2011 15:49 DAL789 MD80 D 17 88.9 12/30/2011 10:46 AAL1683 MD80 D 17 88.6 12/24/2011 15:02 AAY8502 MD80 D 17 88.6 12/30/2011 7:21 DAL1996 MD80 D 17 88 12/14/2011 11:43 DAL66 MD80 D 17 87.8 12/14/2011 10:22 DAL2096 MD80 D 17 87.7 32 Report Generated: 01/11/2012 18:42 Top Ten Loudest Aircraft Noise Events for MSP December 2011 (RMT Site #31) 9501 12th Ave. S., Bloomington Date /me Flight Number Aircraft Type Arrival/ Runway Lmax(dB) Departure 12/12/2011 19:16 BMJ97 BE80 D 17 77.9 12/23/2011 12:32 AWE979 A320 D 30L 77.6 12/23/2011 10:55 AAL1683 MD80 D 17 77.5 12/06/2011 6:42 FFT103 A320 D 17 76.5 12/26/2011 12:17 CPZ5750 E170 D 17 76 12/13/2011 6:25 FFT103 A320 D 17 75.7 12/30/2011 10:47 AAL1683 MD80 D 17 75.5 12/26/2011 14:41 FFT107 A319 D 17 75.4 12/12/2011 11:41 DAL2108 MD90 D 17 75.2 12/18/2011 12:46 BSK393 B734 D 17 74.9 (RMT Site #32) 10325 Pleasant Ave. S., Bloomington Date/Time Flight Number Aircraft Type Arrival/ Runway Lmax(dB) Departure 12/16/2011 12:59 MES2533 CRJ2 A 35 84 12/25/2011 5:31 DAL2129 MD80 D 30L 78.9 12/29/2011 5:36 DAL2129 MD80 D 30L 78.9 12/06/2011 11:12 DAL2330 DC9Q D 30R 76.1 12/13/2011 6:25 FFT103 A320 D 17 74 12/26/2011 12:08 CPZ5719 E170 D 17 73.5 12/26/2011 17:38 CPZ5846 E170 D 17 73.4 12/26/2011 12:27 DAL1073 A320 D 17 73.4 12/24/2011 6:31 FFT71 A320 D 17 73 12/10/2011 14:50 N4077S BE36 D 22 72.9 (RMT Site #33) North River Hills Park, Burnsville Date/Time Flight Number Aircraft Type Arrival/ Runway Lmax(dB) Departure 12/24/2011 9:38 AAL1125 MD80 D 17 83.4 12/24/2011 13:42 DAL785 MD80 D 17 81.1 12/24/2011 7:35 AAL1391 MD80 D 17 81 12/24/2011 14:21 AAL1355 MD80 D 17 80.7 12/31/2011 14:10 AAL1355 MD80 D 17 79.9 12/26/2011 15:51 DAL789 MD80 D 17 79.8 12/26/2011 15:29 SGB2491 B73Q D 17 79.7 12/26/2011 10:51 FFT111 A319 D 17 79.4 12/28/2011 14:12 AAL1355 MD80 D 17 79.1 12/28/2011 11:19 N976AS MD80 D 17 78.9 Report Generated: 01/11/2012 18:42 461 - 33 - Top Ten Loudest Aircraft Noise Events for MSP December 2011 (RMT Site #34) Red Oak Park, Burnsville Date/Tme Flight Number Aircraft Type Arrival/ Runway Lmax(dB) Departure 12/26/2011 15:52 DAL789 MD80 D 17 83.8 12/24/2011 13:42 DAL785 MD80 D 17 81.8 12/24/2011 11:56 DAL66 MD80 D 17 81.3 12/26/2011 14:33 AAL1355 MD80 D 17 79.7 12/24/2011 14:21 AAL1355 MD80 D 17 79.1 12/31/2011 14:10 AAL1355 MD80 D 17 78.9 12/23/2011 12:24 DAL66 MD80 D 17 78.9 12/26/2011 15:30 SGB2491 B73Q D 17 77.9 12/28/2011 11:19 N976AS MD80 D 17 77.1 12/16/2011 7:53 MES2568 CRJ2 A 35 76.9 (RMT Site #35) 2100 Garnet Ln., Eagan Date/Time Flight Number Aircraft Type Arrival/ Runway Lmax(dB) Departure 12/16/2011 20:40 CPZ5711 E170 A 35 88 12/23/2011 17:44 FLG3873 CRJ2 A 35 87.6 12/08/2011 16:14 DAL974 A320 A 35 87.6 12/01/2011 17:49 MES2466 CRJ9 A 35 87 12/21/2011 17:46 FLG3873 CRJ2 A 35 84.6 12/20/2011 5:43 DAL2129 MD80 D 17 83.8 12/09/2011 7:39 DAL1866 A319 A 35 83.6 12/13/2011 11:38 SKW4648 CRJ9 D 17 83.4 12/11/2011 13:35 DAL785 MD80 D 17 83.3 12/13/2011 10:35 AAL1683 MD80 D 17 82.9 (RMT Site #36) Briar Oaks & Scout Pond, Apple Valley Daternme Flight Number Aircraft Type Arrival/ Runway Lmax(dB) Departure 12/21/2011 13:39 SKW4488 CRJ2 A 35 85.6 12/16/2011 10:17 DAL2206 DC9Q A 35 84.5 12/15/2011 9:53 DAL2206 DC9Q A 35 81.4 12/05/2011 8:12 CPZ5702 E170 A 35 81.2 12/21/2011 5:47 DAL2129 MD80 D 17 80.9 12/14/2011 15:50 DAL789 MD80 D 17 80.8 12/05/2011 20:56 MTN7553 ATR A 35 80.5 12/09/2011 15:37 MES2551 CRJ2 A 35 80.4 12/23/2011 12:24 DAL66 MD80 D 17 80.3 12/16/2011 16:08 MES2629 CRJ2 A 35 80.3 - 34 - Report Generated: 01/11/2012 18:42 Top Ten Loudest Aircraft Noise Events for MSP December 2011 (RMT Site #37) 4399 Woodgate Ln. N., Eagan Date/Time Flight Number Aircraft Type Arrival/ Runway Lmax(dB) Departure 12/11/2011 11:43 DAL66 MD80 D 17 83.3 12/13/2011 7:50 FDX800 B72Q D 17 83 12/28/2011 15:53 DAL789 MD80 D 17 82.9 12/14/2011 11:44 DAL66 MD80 D 17 82.7 12/20/2011 9:00 FDX800 B72Q D 17 81.4 12/10/2011 13:40 DAL785 MD80 D 17 80.8 12/20/2011 13:42 DAL785 MD80 D 17 80.4 12/02/2011 11:15 DAL2330 DC9Q D 17 79.9 12/13/2011 8:42 AAL1125 MD80 D 17 79.7 12/13/2011 7:34 FDX645 DC10 D 17 79.5 (RMT Site #38) 3957 Turquoise Cir., Eagan Date/Time Flight Number Aircraft Type Arrival/ Runway Lmax(dB) Departure 12/14/2011 11:44 DAL66 MD80 D 17 87.4 12/24/2011 7:21 DAL1132 MD80 D 17 86.5 12/13/2011 15:36 AAL1355 MD80 D 17 86.2 12/28/2011 15:52 DAL789 MD80 D 17 85.8 12/26/2011 14:20 DAL785 MD80 D 17 85.3 12/20/2011 9:00 FDX800 B72Q D 17 85 12/20/2011 13:42 DAL785 MD80 D 17 84.6 12/12/2011 11:03 DAL2330 DC9Q D 17 84.6 12/12/2011 12:05 DAL66 MD80 D 17 84.5 12/13/2011 7:50 FDX800 B72Q D 17 84.1 (RMT Site #39) 3477 St. Charles PI., Eagan Date /me Flight Number Aircraft Type Arrival/ Runway Lmax(dB) Departure 12/31/2011 14:06 DAL883 MD80 D 17 86.1 12/13/2011 8:44 DAL2198 MD80 D 17 86 12/14/2011 17:29 DAL2296 MD80 D 17 85.9 12/26/2011 14:40 DAL883 MD80 D 17 85.8 12/13/2011 10:06 DAL2096 MD80 D 17 84.3 12/28/2011 14:04 DAL883 MD80 D 17 84.1 12/31/2011 13:32 DAL1496 MD80 D 17 84 12/31/2011 7:21 DAL1996 MD80 D 17 83.9 12/12/2011 10:24 DAL2096 MD80 D 17 83.7 12/13/2011 7:03 DAL1996 MD80 D 17 83.6 December 2011 Remote Monitorina Tower Top Ten Summary The top ten noise events and the event ranges at each RMT for December 2011 were comprised of 74.6% departure operations. The predominant top ten aircraft type was the MD80 with 44.1 % of the highest Lmax events. December 2011 Technical Advisor Report Notes Unknown fields are due to unavailability of multilateration flight track data. Flight tracking data were unavailable between 12/27/11 at 9:53 a.m. and 12/28/11 at 7:42 a.m. Report Generated: 01/11/2012 18:42 - 35 - Analysis of Aircraft Noise Events DNL December 2011** Remote Monitoring Towers Date #1 #2 #3 #4 #5 #6 #7 #8 #9 #10 #11 #12 #13 #14 #15 12/01/2011 49 52.3 55.5 57.4 65.3 68.6 62.8 57.4 NA NA NA NA 30 57.3 40 12/02/2011 55.9 59 62.1 58.8 66.1 65.4 50.9 52.8 NA NA NA NA 53.8 56.9 57.9 12/03/2011 49.2 52.1 58.4 55.7 66.3 66.5 58.5 55.2 NA NA 29.3 NA 28.8 55 40.5 12/04/2011 48 50.7 55.2 57 64.4 65.9 59.8 56.9 NA NA 29.4 NA NA 56.2 NA 12/05/2011 50.5 53.8 56.3 59.2 65.3 68.3 61.2 57.2 NA NA NA NA NA 55.5 38.2 12/06/2011 49.3 55.1 57.6 56.6 63.7 66 56.5 55.5 NA NA NA 27.9 50.4 56 54.8 12/07/2011 50.3 52.4 53.2 57.8 63.5 66.7 58.7 57.9 NA NA NA NA 37 57.7 44.4 12/08/2011 44.7 51.9 53.6 55.7 63.5 67.4 57.2 57.1 45.8 41.5 43.6 32 36.9 57.3 NA 12/09/2011 44.6 51.1 50.9 55.8 63.1 67 57.3 56.8 NA NA NA NA NA 55.5 38.9 12/10/2011 51.8 54.9 58.5 54.9 62.5 61.1 NA 40.6 NA 29.9 37.2 NA 51.6 53.3 55.2 12/11/2011 56.2 58.1 63 58.6 66.1 64 41.5 34 36 NA NA 29.2 55.7 58 58 12/12/2011 56 59.2 63.4 59.3 67 65.5 39.7 47.4 NA NA NA NA 56.7 60.9 58.4 12/13/2011 57.3 59.9 63.8 59.6 67.4 65.3 42.5 37.9 NA NA NA NA 55.5 60.9 59.6 12/14/2011 57.8 58.2 65.1 59.1 69.6 69 57.6 57.5 36.2 NA NA 39.2 54.1 58.7 57.5 12/15/2011 50 53.9 57.3 58.4 65.8 68.9 62.4 58.7 NA NA NA 30.9 31.4 59.9 41.1 12/16/2011 51.4 50 59.1 55.1 66.5 68.3 59.3 56.9 NA NA 40.9 NA 51.8 58.8 51.7 12/17/2011 53.1 53.3 56.5 57.1 65.9 67.5 60.8 59.1 NA NA 27.7 NA NA 57.8 31.5 12/18/2011 50.6 53.8 55.9 56.4 61.1 65.2 37.4 55 NA NA NA NA 55.4 60.7 55.6 12/19/2011 51.4 51.1 58.9 57.1 67.1 66.5 62.4 56.5 46.3 NA NA NA 51.6 61.7 52.3 12/20/2011 54.8 56.9 62 57.5 66.5 64.1 55.3 49.8 38.7 36.1 35.8 25.5 56.1 60.1 57.1 12/21/2011 52.6 55.5 58.3 59.9 67.7 69.1 63.2 58.2 26 30 32.5 NA 29.7 59.9 43.3 12/22/2011 51.5 54 58.8 59.3 67.1 68.4 62.2 57.4 NA 27.5 NA NA 60.8 61.1 56.6 12/23/2011 51.1 53.7 55.6 57 63.8 67.4 58.6 57.6 28.2 NA NA NA 39.9 59.7 41.4 12/24/2011 45 50.5 51.3 54 59.7 64.5 54.2 53.4 NA NA NA NA 46.1 58.3 49.2 12/25/2011 44.9 47.8 52.4 54.4 64.8 65.4 62.1 57.1 34.9 NA 44.1 NA 32.6 56 NA 12/26/2011 52 54.1 57.5 55.9 62.4 65 54.7 53.7 58.9 61 30.5 NA 48.1 60.9 49.4 12/27/2011 40 50 47.4 54.7 64.7 62.4 59.8 54.2 NA NA NA NA NA 55.8 NA 12/28/2011 57 58.6 62.7 58.4 66.7 65.4 50.7 46.9 NA NA NA NA 56 58 56.7 12/29/2011 55.7 54.3 62.3 58.9 69.3 69.6 63.9 58.9 30.9 25.3 NA 30.9 55.9 60.9 58.3 12/30/2011 56.1 57.2 62.6 58 67.1 66.9 58.1 55.4 36.1 31.2 33.4 45.8 54.9 62.6 57 12/31/2011 55.6 58.6 62.3 58.3 66.4 64.7 53.9 55 NA NA NA NA 53.6 60.2 56 Mo.DNL 53.2 55.4 59.8 57.6 65.9 66.7 59 55.9 44.6 46.2 34 32.2 52.6 59 54.1 * *Note: flight tracking data were unavailable between 12/27/11 at 9:53 a.m. and 12/28/11 at 7:42 a.m. - 36 Report Generated: 01/11/2012 18:42 Analysis of Aircraft Noise Events DNL December 2011 ** Remote Monitoring Towers Date #16 #17 #18 #19 #20 #21 #22 #23 #24 #25 #26 #27 #28 #29 12/01/2011 62.7 NA 40.2 33.8 41.5 32.4 54.4 48.1 58 46.2 46.1 57.6 58.6 53.5 12/02/2011 61.5 45.9 56 50.7 25.2 46.7 52.2 60 55.4 53.6 44.3 50.1 53.9 46.4 12/03/2011 60.1 42.2 48 44.9 36.8 40.2 52.9 46.1 55.8 35.9 45.6 56.8 56.7 50.7 12/04/2011 61.2 35.7 39.4 35.1 47.3 31.4 54.7 42.7 56.6 NA 38.7 53.9 57.2 50.6 12/05/2011 60.3 39.4 42.4 43.4 40.8 35 52.8 38 54.8 43.8 31.6 55.4 57.8 50.9 12/06/2011 59.6 NA 52.4 47 41.5 35.3 51.6 58.6 55.6 47.1 44.4 52.1 52.8 52.3 12/07/2011 62.9 37.5 53.6 49 35.6 42.4 54.7 47.2 58.4 40.1 42.2 52.8 54.6 51.5 12/08/2011 63.2 34.5 47.2 45.4 30.6 33.5 53.5 47.3 56.6 NA 38.6 52.1 54.6 55.5 12/09/2011 61.8 NA 47.8 43.8 26 NA 49.4 42.6 54.5 31.2 37.1 54.4 52.5 52.6 12/10/2011 57 33.2 53.4 47.3 NA 41 45.8 58.7 50.5 49.9 48.9 37.9 48.8 NA 12/11/2011 59.8 27.6 55.5 47.8 NA 48.7 47 61.7 55.6 53.8 51.6 38.4 49 NA 12/12/2011 63.2 31.6 55.8 52.2 NA 48.5 54.2 63.8 57.9 52.2 54.9 35.3 51.1 45.8 12/13/2011 62.5 NA 58.5 54.1 25.9 49.7 53.6 62.6 58.4 54.4 54 40.3 56.8 36.5 12/14/2011 63 29.7 55.5 50.3 34.3 49.2 53.2 61.5 57.2 50.1 53.3 54.6 57.8 52.4 12/15/2011 64.8 NA 39.5 NA 38.8 NA 57.1 45.4 60.9 38.8 47.3 54.3 58.6 57.5 12/16/2011 63.1 NA 54 49.7 33.4 47.4 53.9 57.4 58 48 50.6 55.3 53 50.5 12/17/2011 62.4 31.6 31.9 46.8 31.5 NA 55.9 44.9 58.3 33.1 43.9 55.6 55.9 53.9 12/18/2011 64.2 35.5 54.5 51.8 32.1 51.3 56.5 60 60.2 50.3 55.6 45.3 53.2 50.2 12/19/2011 66.3 NA 41.3 44.4 49 51.6 56.4 58.5 59.9 53.9 49.3 57.3 57.5 52.8 12/20/2011 64 43.4 56.2 53.7 NA 48 54.7 62.4 58.8 51 55.7 52.7 54.1 44.5 12/21/2011 65 49.6 53.8 50.8 50 36 56.6 48.5 59.6 42.5 42.9 60.6 59.6 49.2 12/22/2011 65.3 28.7 38.3 40.4 38.4 49 56.3 61.9 60.3 51.7 52.3 58.2 56.3 51.3 12/23/2011 64.8 45.9 54.9 51.1 48.8 38.4 57.3 47.3 60.6 45.9 45.6 53.2 56.5 52.4 12/24/2011 63 45.8 54.4 51.7 49.3 41.4 55 52.1 58.1 43.3 46.5 49 57 50.8 12/25/2011 61.1 38.4 38.6 37.6 43.7 31.5 52.8 39.4 56.7 33.9 37.8 56.1 57.6 54.2 12/26/2011 63.4 43.6 54.9 48.9 39 41.2 55.3 55.9 59.3 51.7 50.1 47.2 52.4 50.6 12/27/2011 60.9 NA 39.1 NA 49.7 NA 55.1 38.9 56.8 35 29.7 57.3 57.4 50.5 12/28/2011 57.7 31.6 54.4 48.2 NA 50.9 49.8 61 55.8 53 52.9 48.3 53.2 39.5 12/29/2011 65.6 45.4 32.9 37.2 48.7 37.9 57.1 61.5 60.1 53.5 49.1 58 58.2 55.3 12/30/2011 64.7 42.7 49.2 48.4 36.4 45.2 55.2 62 60 54 53.3 53.9 52.6 48.3 12/31/2011 63.6 NA 55.8 51.4 43.7 43.2 55.8 59.1 59.3 51.9 48.8 47.7 57.7 46.9 Mo.DNL 63 40.7 52.8 48.8 43.5 45.6 54.6 58.3 58.2 49.9 50 54.5 56 51.5 * *Note: flight tracking data were unavailable between 12/27/11 at 9:53 a.m. and 12/28/11 at 7:42 a.m. Report Generated: 01/11/2012 18:42 - 37 - Analysis of Aircraft Noise Events DNL December 2011 ** Remote Monitoring Towers Date #30 #31 #32 #33 #34 #35 #36 #37 #38 #39 12/01/2011 44.5 30 36.6 NA 26.4 50.2 53.5 NA NA 27.2 12/02/2011 60.8 46.7 37.5 44.8 32.3 52.5 47.6 48.2 49.5 51.6 12/03/2011 57.8 30.7 43.2 41.5 NA 55 51.4 44.9 40.9 32.6 12/04/2011 46.1 29.9 NA NA NA 47.8 51.3 35 NA 26.1 12/05/2011 57.4 35.8 39.3 NA 38.6 50.2 53.6 NA NA NA 12/06/2011 59.7 47.3 43.7 39.5 45.4 49.3 49.1 28.5 36.6 47.9 12/07/2011 61.2 42.2 43.5 47.5 46.2 57.7 54.2 43.9 37.9 NA 12/08/2011 58.1 44.5 28.3 36.5 35.8 54.7 52.8 48.9 45.3 NA 12/09/2011 57.3 NA 38.4 NA 33.5 53.4 53.7 NA NA 24.5 12/10/2011 58 39.5 38.8 47.8 38.6 49.6 39.3 45.8 50 50.7 12/11/2011 58.2 35.7 NA 45.5 32.2 51.4 38.6 45.5 49.2 52.3 12/12/2011 60.6 42.6 32 47.5 37.4 51.5 50.8 47.3 52.9 53.3 12/13/2011 63.6 49.4 46.8 46.9 43.8 55.6 51.7 51.7 55.7 56.9 12/14/2011 61.3 44.2 33.4 49.1 44.9 50.1 45.3 48.8 53.4 54.5 12/15/2011 49.5 NA 41.9 30 29.7 52.7 55.9 NA NA NA 12/16/2011 60.9 39.9 44.5 NA 38.3 54.7 53.9 37.9 40.2 44.1 12/17/2011 46.8 46 27.8 43.2 39.4 51.3 53 NA NA NA 12/18/2011 60.1 44.6 39.9 49.9 46.7 52.5 47.2 44.1 45 49.7 12/19/2011 48 NA 41.3 25.5 43.5 52.1 55.7 NA NA NA 12/20/2011 63.3 45.8 40.9 43.6 44.4 57.8 53.8 49.4 52.3 52.3 12/21/2011 61 44.1 40.7 36.8 43 57.3 57.1 41.6 39.9 NA 12/22/2011 42.6 29 26.1 35.1 26.4 49.4 53.7 26.9 NA NA 12/23/2011 61.4 46.1 41.5 45.3 45 55 53.2 47.8 46.8 37.7 12/24/2011 60.9 44.7 45.7 50.8 49.5 53 49.7 48.8 54.2 51.8 12/25/2011 39.3 27.6 49.7 36.2 36.8 45.7 49 36.7 NA NA 12/26/2011 58 45.5 44.7 50.4 47 52.4 46 46.3 49.4 51.1 12/27/2011 40.9 NA NA NA 36.5 44.8 48.6 39.7 NA NA 12/28/2011 59.5 44.4 33.5 47.6 35.5 47 46.5 48.4 52.6 53.7 12/29/2011 46.6 43.1 47.4 47 43 51.5 54.7 43 38.3 38.6 12/30/2011 57.6 43.7 33.7 42 37.9 51.8 53.6 48.9 49.6 47.2 12/31/2011 59.2 42.5 29.2 44.2 39.8 44.3 NA 45 50.9 53.7 Mo.DNL 58.8 43.1 41.9 44.9 42.2 52.9 52.2 45.4 48.4 49.2 * *Note: flight tracking data were unavailable between 12/27/11 at 9:53 a.m. and 12/28/11 at 7:42 a.m. - 38 - Sq- Report Generated: 01/11/2012 18:42 12/1/2011 - 12/31 /2011 Runway 17 Departure Analysis Report Minneapolis -St. Paul International Airport MSS" 4; e 0 Not 5 NU 4 This re report is for informational purposes onl and cannot be used for enforcement purposs 3662 Carrier Jets Departed Runway 17 - 12/1/2011 - 12/31/2011 - A 6 d 3 Y ✓'� 4L " � 4' F rw, ,W,C ,,,,,,,. r -- 112 f 'r .. MT/ V' ,' , 44-4/ 4 't , ''''' , - i r i t; ' Ei a 1 - 1 4.4 ' 41 44 ; 4 °: : i ti 1: . ° ,,' irt,"; ,,_, i (lee ,-- ,-_,; upp- .., tp ' � Runway 17 Departure Overflight Grid Analysis 10., 3 :t 2 __ &Aim, a - -- wes t_ 1, s....= 1 :Nilo , _ t :,---,1 1,,,,,,,, 1 4,1111. , L,4:1 PI Wu'INI lc ,, . , . ,,,,,... m , M11111 4 l — 4 ,.,.„„,..k ,Ii.,7, ,,,. ---„, i a iiii , '4 5 • Ila._ a.° t 1 4 , ,,c• , A , i ,, t pl°7"" irpAr ,-,4r-l'' 7 i f A iliViir-7 , '''-' '"i 1 t -,,IpW.," 4 44'11 A\I" ' - 7 ki , , a t , , r A ,, i4 / �. ►� 40;111,q!, • -a ill , • , • 59 53' .. 1 �,1 or 1 VAVIii " li �04 l r frill!Mk � v 0 3 98 (� J O �� .51'.. . 1 4 Ara **Note: flight tracking data were unavailable between 12/27/11 at 9:53 a.m. and 12/28/11 at 7:42 a.m. Metropolitan Airports Commission Runway 17 Departure Analysis Report - 12/1/2011- 12/31/2011. Report Generated: 01/11/2012 11:41 - 1 - Runway 17 Carrier Jet Departure Operations - 12/1/2011-12/31/2011 3659 (99.9 %) Westbound Carrier Jet �� 3 (0.1 %) Carrier Jet Departure Departure Operations flying the Runway 17 Jet Operations turned west before passing over the Departure Procedure (passing over the 2.5 NM turn Runway 17 2.5 NM turn point. This is 0.2% of 1440 point) and Runway 17 eastbound Carrier Jet westbound departures Departure Operations , -.my. ,,,- - gm - li ,,,- ; , : " Arikt, :..,frir,,,,,, .1- fiC' If - ` - l e , , r r � s Q . r' 00® 1 4 I l ) ( 40:oltairr! / 4� irte` y,. „a �.� ... iristio ti'^ e e y I - , w ,,,, ^- .,, ,,'° itl. ter - i fr / R = f i r''' ■ f , :q. ,. £ t� / �. ,• 3r' w %) „ 3 4 . i c 4 . w :' / y r 0 . . , ,,,,:.:3.... /rf 0 �" 0 /i'v 0 0 , t' 0 - / ' 4 "4', ' te - r r /f � %/ _.... r /,.. . ^„ Metropolitan Airports Commission Runway 17 Departure Analysis Report - 12/1/2011 - 12/31/2011. Report Generated: 01/11/2012 11:41 - 2 - 5i Runway 17 Nighttime Carrier Jet Departure Operations - 12/1/2011 - 12/31/2011 N. (j 3 " y �c ! `a ' 1156 r I _ 7 ti es s ea » ,� e sliliii... '''‘.-, i --- I i ,...- fi„fd I . , ./ „ 2,,, ..,..... , ,, , , ,,..., .....--,„,* ..„ , , h , .f = N '-' 4 a ,1- .4.,:t.„ --*---,—„ ' .c-Iliv , ; t ... ; '''''''''''' ,-(.: :I. , '"rii: 1 i ' h i , 1i ,-7/ i i h.,_3_,' 0 ,,,,,, -- , i ,s ue - ' E 1 , , , `- �.- _ , . - - , Y .< A �w- mmr rhm Y i Y rY d meviHe ' r tie .-_. : V, ; 1 j i , - "7- : ''' 1 ' € w" pple valley r t by �� €; .-� 31 Nighttime Carrier Jet Departure Operations off of Minnesota Runway 17 in 12/1/2011 - 12/31/2011 (10:30 p.m. - 6:00 a.m.) 0 (0 %) Westbound Carrier Jet �� 2 (6.5 %) Westbound Carrier Jet Departures turned west between 2.5 and 3.0 NM Departures turned west after 3.the 0 NM from start of from start of takeoff and remained over the takeoff and remained over Minnesota River Valley (trending with Runway 17 Valley (trending with Runway 17 River Departure River Departure Heading) Procedure) 0 (0 %) Carrier Jet Departures turned �� 1 (3.2%) Remaining westbound Carrier west before passing over the Runway 17 2.5 NM Jet Departures flew the Runway 17 Jet Departure turn point Procedure (passing over the 2.5 NM turn point), and with an enroute heading to the destination airport 28 (90.3 %) Other Nighttime Carrier Jet Departure Operatons Metropolitan Airports Commission Runway 17 Departure Analysis Report - 12/1/2011- 12/31/2011. Report Generated: 01/11/2012 11:4 3 - se Remote Monitoring Tower (RMT) Site Locations � a " ® • ul ." ©,� t ' :t, -- 'r . "y£z � Il L , -�r s _ _ ° S ID "'9d n ..,..... ® � a „1` A ® � s h t II r p 1� a r i s � g �"�.. tt e * ,� ;: � " -� )x 4 t s it § it "i �3 ., C -.! il'` � �mi to 0 . 0, .,„, L r-' S g e.. € d ., ;i , , fi r rns uille l I av m le Valley \ vs 1 t LEGEND 0 Existing RMTs Runway 17 -35 RMTs Metropolitan Airports Commission Runway 17 Departure Analysis Report - 12/1/2011 - 12/31/2011. Report Generated: 01/11/2012 11:41 - 4 - Analysis of Aircraft Noise Levels - DNL dBA 12/1/2011- 12/31/2011 Date #30 #31 #32 #33 #34 #35 #36 #37 #38 #39 1 44.5 30 36.6 NA 26.4 50.2 53.5 NA NA 27.2 2 60.8 46.7 37.5 44.8 32.3 52.5 47.6 48.2 49.5 51.6 3 57.8 30.7 43.2 41.5 NA 55 51.4 44.9 40.9 32.6 4 46.1 29.9 NA NA NA 47.8 51.3 35 NA 26.1 5 57.4 35.8 39.3 NA 38.6 50.2 53.6 NA NA NA 6 59.7 47.3 43.7 39.5 45.4 49.3 49.1 28.5 36.6 47.9 7 61.2 42.2 43.5 47.5 46.2 57.7 54.2 43.9 37.9 NA 8 58.1 44.5 28.3 36.5 35.8 54.7 52.8 48.9 45.3 NA 9 57.3 NA 38.4 NA 33.5 53.4 53.7 NA NA 24.5 10 58 39.5 38.8 47.8 38.6 49.6 39.3 45.8 50 50.7 11 58.2 35.7 NA 45.5 32.2 51.4 38.6 45.5 49.2 52.3 12 60.6 42.6 32 47.5 37.4 51.5 50.8 47.3 52.9 53.3 13 63.6 49.4 46.8 46.9 43.8 55.6 51.7 51.7 55.7 56.9 14 61.3 44.2 33.4 49.1 44.9 50.1 45.3 48.8 53.4 54.5 15 49.5 NA 41.9 30 29.7 52.7 55.9 NA NA NA 16 60.9 39.9 44.5 NA 38.3 54.7 53.9 37.9 40.2 44.1 17 46.8 46 27.8 43.2 39.4 51.3 53 NA NA NA 18 60.1 44.6 39.9 49.9 46.7 52.5 47.2 44.1 45 49.7 19 48 NA 41.3 25.5 43.5 52.1 55.7 NA NA NA 20 63.3 45.8 40.9 43.6 44.4 57.8 53.8 49.4 52.3 52.3 21 61 44.1 40.7 36.8 43 57.3 57.1 41.6 39.9 NA 22 42.6 29 26.1 35.1 26.4 49.4 53.7 26.9 NA NA 23 61.4 46.1 41.5 45.3 45 55 53.2 47.8 46.8 37.7 24 60.9 44.7 45.7 50.8 49.5 53 49.7 48.8 54.2 51.8 25 39.3 27.6 49.7 36.2 36.8 45.7 49 36.7 NA NA 26 58 45.5 44.7 50.4 47 52.4 46 46.3 49.4 51.1 27 40.9 NA NA NA 36.5 44.8 48.6 39.7 NA NA 28 59.5 44.4 33.5 47.6 35.5 47 46.5 48.4 52.6 53.7 29 46.6 43.1 47.4 47 43 51.5 54.7 43 38.3 38.6 30 57.6 43.7 33.7 42 37.9 51.8 53.6 48.9 49.6 47.2 31 59.2 42.5 29.2 44.2 39.8 44.3 NA 45 50.9 53.7 Av. DNL 58.8 43.1 41.9 44.9 42.2 52.9 52.2 45.4 48.4 49.2 Metropolitan Airports Commission Runway 17 Departure Analysis Report - 12/1/2011 - 12131/2011. Report Generated: 01/11/2012 11:41 - 5 - teD Aircraft Noise Levels DNL dBA 12/1/2011- 12/31/2011 RMT Aircraft DNL Aircraft DNL Aircraft DNL Aircraft DNL 12/01/08-12/31/08 12/01/09-12/31/09 12/01/10-12/31/10 12/01/11-12/31/11 30 NA 57.7 58.2 58.8 31 NA 44.3 46.1 43.1 32 NA 42.1 41.2 41.9 33 NA 42.1 43.6 44.9 34 NA 37.4 40.8 42.2 35 NA 49.7 50.4 52.9 36 NA 50.2 49.7 52.2 37 NA 46.1 45.2 45.4 38 NA 47.7 45.8 48.4 39 NA 48.1 46.1 49.2 Top 15 Runway 17 Departure Destination Report Airport City Heading (deg.) #Ops Percent of Total Ops DEN DENVER 237° 193 5.3% ORD CHICAGO (O'HARE) 124° 181 4.9% ATL ATLANTA 149° 169 4.6% MDW CHICAGO (MIDWAY) 124° 161 4.4% PHX PHOENIX 231° 123 3.4% EWR NEW YORK 106° 112 3.1% DFW DALLAS/ FORT WORTH 193° 110 3% IAH HOUSTON 185° 95 2.6% MKE MILWAUKEE 114° 87 2.4% LGA NEW YORK (LA GUARDIA) 105° 86 2.3% CVG CINCINNATI 127° 85 2.3% STL ST LOUIS 160° 79 2.2% CLT CHARLOTTE 133° 66 1.8% FSD SIOUX FALLS 245° 66 1.8% MCI KANSAS CITY 188° 65 1.8% Metropolitan Airports Commission Runway 17 Departure Analysis Report - 12/1/2011 - 12/31/2011. Report Generated: 01/11/2012 11:41 - 6 - Le i December 2011 Crossing -in- the - Corridor Analysis Minneapolis -St. Paul International Airport t4t +s { f . I ' 0. ,,,,,, to „...„4 i r rt.,. ` "' ' 1 1 I I 1 This and report cannot is e informat► l b used for for enfonal rcement purposes purposons Cp.; Metropolitan Airports Commission December 20 ** Carrier Jet Departure (23:0Operations 06:00) Runways 12L & 12R 0 - 43 Carrier Jets Departed Runways 12L R. 12R between the . pill hours of 23:00 and 06:00 "ms r 5 � '' r " .; *'' , '''''' ' " e C, Lt..-, `r - ,. Bp�VA1 !x S mom liptt' a �, q ,., p d t� ri.- a � n £ � @ F A t �„".�„ ® 148 1 West � .., .... "w. i , ,,,,,"--7,,,ey ,i ) , I f (mot s ® • F � - ' m nfish L ` 1 '`„' ` i � M � max' �:�- ..,,�` r� ,�. � t^ c � � t ((`` ` ,�.. ,,mr r te`".`- +„„ .. t . w i�' �� ri'�: Sri, ;, r t r ,..ti �� \ �¢ "� �""' . � ,„ _—!-- li' -"r*.z41•4,1i,-41\r,‘\1,1'"7.,, --1w,1[4k'.•‘—„,..,t.L. 8 -44h1/4. 0.14 Bloom > � , ,.''' , ''',Ir /- 4W ' -' ' ' l'4, -; fr ‘ N-4' ."''' fit: nc*, , a _ w ill u rrmavitl e / .! i14. - ''' — -r" ViraiAlli , 1 i i NN � \a r , �: s APP _ ey . E > 4 of i }y : * *Note: flight tracking da were unavailable between 12/27/11 at 9:53 a.m. and 12/28/11 at 7:42 a.m. Crossing in the Corridor Analysis. Report Generated: 01/11/2012 11:40 Page 1 (.0.5 Metropolitan Airports Commission December 2011 Carrier Jet Departure Operations Performing the Crossing Procedure off Runways 12L & 12R (23:00 - 06:00) 26 (60 %) Carrier Jets Crossed After Departing Runways 12L & 12R between the hours of 23:00 and 06:00 i ' AIM Wi g M1 � ""`e� ,_.... ; 1 1 y 5 � /)p:w b�.� � o c9 �'T" 1 a - j 14 I a -- ► r i.,.,4 ® r .i' 13 West v ii .141.......--,_ , ! i n - - � r --",' -7""" It -I ; .7 '&. ',..• ::,. '.,-- ''- , 4 ' r • it- :., .,,..fiaticr ,:, '>::.....„,/ : ',.;/-. ii 11 ' ' j,, ' le Li 1 ` /! :110 .. ._tj. th$ � y ' ° Zithfie " t y ° * r / , ` '�� ` '-�.. ' ) - -- . z t . ©rt L a. '-- ' ° t `, , - .., +.„ ,�'--y.�,,� �` :.�:: Bloom cxk �,si" .� � a - rr "��-- ,. °°"""" � .� - s; \ i ''' i....: - .,,,,,:,, it , :- /..,,," 1 b , „... ,_,,,,,,,,,,,,," ... ; : , , ,.,1. ,.,.:::!.‘,..,,,..::..,,,,,:44„,,,,...7.10, .. .. '- 7- .,.„..„..(r, ,.. " ., . , _,,,,,,,..,,,,,,,.„ .. „ .. 7 . As .:, 1 rfr .. ,....: , g w ; ey f - ..R a + , x III Page 2 Crossing in the Corridor Analysis. port Generated: 01/11/2012 11:40 Metropolitan Airports Commission December 2011 Carrier Jet Departure Operations Runways 12L & 1 (06:00 - 23:00) 2078 Carrier Jets Departed Runways 12L & 12R between the hours of 06:00 and 23:00 ,1 ^�.. k - N . � .,,mo I .....=.i t ` ' -mss _ " M P .,., 1104 11:0W „ ).- , , f- i , , si , $ 4:-.-/41. � , mz- � i r > , 1, �� ` �f i f "' � � , 1. • ' `' - o� T °' 110 ; -,/ r . * � 6 1 k i fi =ld' '' � � �� .z 'w . Bloom on ` � � 1 "'•. '' 1\ 1 � ® _ -.g„ 4, . ,, '''' , ). / 1 iirtfifit,,, 4)). , - . - - - r j ,,,,,,„4,-- i 000.1.,,,,e0.5„--01X,,---‹ ,- -,„5",.:-,,,,,,,:,-/.„, ',.,4 , °I, :,v,.. < i ' '' , 1 '' ' '': ‘ ' 's 7' NI:),,,'''..„.F...7"" it .� r / ,. r 113 '� � 1 �ql s �/ -.%- '- „,»s' ,. 1;.. „ '--', * -- ..;',.%. 1 1 4,1',4,0‘1 V § 'k �' \ A \ ,, * , it/Il , �F'°” ✓a � �. ° r � / � �t f iti 1 � d i p a � � �, `` �! err %: ;, ''`� -- .c� � , /,, , W, � ! itt' 14° 41 il , '`4� illi�� i � , �* ` \ ` , V Ili !'`= '' /'/f / �' /�'!' f' tC 1,1�',i`il ;� i ' 13� : 1 �.' t ' Crossing in the Corridor Analysis. Report Generated: 01/11/2012 11:40 Page 3 Metropolitan Airports Commission December 2011 Carrier Jet Departure Performin the Crossing Procedure Operations off Runways 12L & 1 2R (06:00 - 23:00) 518 (25 %) Carrier Jets Crossed After Dang Runwa ::: ,,, 2 ,,.. :1 1 8 : ,4 12R between the hours of 06:0 anrtid 23:00 r �I —= ` .. - �. t� I ; . s.,- ' 1 I t n -�,. +.`. y ce ; 4 r ` ,, liar/Moms, nk—a r+.. - .....�. " .° .a ii, • l `\ € q l I , ,v F „ #$ 4 '' t o � '' f E�� ' § F Y f 3 t € s 1 }' .,,�'ll� ►1 $b,k {�tl ,�� ! .ta � t �J ; �1�� t ; } + _.$ ,, ; t � 1.1 i � 'i t � 1 �, / , � ?� I rt u, `� v �, s'' 8t `€ * f s i a ! t f 7 ` e �� ' i � € iae 1t1' r 'I i E�31 � E (1 I ' d 7 oi , .e „_,,,,, 7- ',7.; , 't , ,. � ----- f ' „, f /, / / ; � ` ;*',1:9; (` ., ' � ..�I,� . a .” � � , i ' � i ! i f/' i� �l 9i , t RI field M <� � ``e 17, j !'I' ' 'r '" � '�s'' f t � 4 �,€ / ✓P /`i' >, r 7 h p N` IY.G `^1�Lz g x.d _ , A<° • .� 'I' y✓ i 1 ' I 'N.1,,,_, ,. -.'-- - - ---.s..--. ::-......;1....„1.,....--,444 , Bloom c u 1 # � Ell .��. -, ,A ,..'�' �"' -r %7 ,a -. , a `,�� , ry* '"w�- +�. / of' , ,,t, r,, 1 , , 4 , 4 1 `• iiii)lk\4' ..41.*:416.,'',,,,.,s,:l: ,i,:...,,,,,.. .1 44. : ,,,,,, `_'' , ;':..,, .„,--' ,,',1"'''''',,,,,,,..''.... ,, -.:-,' !•-1,. ,--' - ',/1 I ... V iillifittie X i 111‘..Sk*:'10.1.:,"1 ''.'-,':.-''..--':-., ' --.,,,,. .,,,,, - 4.-------p,,. ,,,,,, , jedte .!.- if ,,,, 11417::404."k-lAW:N.o..4'-''',..-tikZ,',... ,. / ,./ , / —if ,,_ " i : „„4.„.%,":„_______40r4„_,,, lr ;,,, , \ \1 1 ,‘, ,, , , , ,,ir,..,,,44,,, ,. _ i,,,,,,,,,,,,, ,,,,,, 1- ,f,e, ,.....",f i N -----„ ,,,,,,,,::";,------ ..,.„ At.,....-- ,,,, ,,N : - ‘.:, , 1.,,i I ,,,A.,,,,s,:,...._. „ , p _ :,..__ _02--,--, , le ' or 1 _ „ 00. "`Sr ,..›/Hire--_, it Air , . „„ _. P og g0 1 a l e Vall= R :,,:„.:,,,,,,,,,, I . \ .,. A Page 4 Crossing in the Corridor Analysis. Report Generated: 01/11/2012 11:40 A I) 7'4' ' o, P t 1 m NORTHWEST PKI(yY. O � .,., .. , O O Neil r 1 j` � ^ I � � °�F il Lake N. ' �D i 5„, ,,,,,,, ; Nk L j ry I =H-4 w o�i ` i �� T S o f L F�� P '2L __l„„N: t cA m 4 " j. . , I, .Pla ton .'?1,, spa € � ,l:ilt111 Durk s�s i P o if c �' a µ P c S �+,P y ,p't v o t ° e C. S A . NO SS (LONE OAK RD) . • 1 ... • xa 7, .. . ,. "":"'.. \ .. FA .. ,. ,.. Post 0..mnnr0 Office . i., ( l T Y• .J, I - 55121 i_( . , } 1 ryK HW -3r ti rryD l' °° i l � I r -. � r I T-7i 4 > �� _..... Bur 22 Pond 13ui ' ° ` , a r "`°.- s 11 4 - 1 7/,tresher . ,,• 'j Oaks '-L - -Ar, ›: i Fields. 11 1 ark C - 1 e \--------,..„ § % V\T . (1).. ,, 5 P 7\ -i... - , ,t-k, \ % Y 'S 0:42.1 T / / //' ` Wbr EC OOOO.E no.�k •• ' o P . ®� L c .. ._ � Fire Sta. City of Eagan 0 1 1111 . � Eagan Airport Relations 0 w L Q �� -� Commision (ARC) w L Townhomes /Condo Parks City ROW 17 w ; l't 4 6' ((��J e� w 1 j ARC Single Family Homes Lakes - - -- - - -- Private Centerline s z _ 1111411111111111111 1111411111111111111 1111411111111111111 W`,1 U J -_ _ I ,.00 IFeet I V NM 627 Eagan Airport Relations Commission Town Hall Meeting Tuesday, November 30, 2010 7 - 8:30 p.m. Eagan Community Center 1. Welcome from the Eagan City Council —Gary Hansen, City Councilmember 2. Welcome and Introductions of the Airport Relations Commission —Chuck Thorkildson, Eagan Airport Relations Commission Chair 3. Present and Future Impact of Runway 17/35 on your Neighborhood —Chad Legve, Metropolitan Airports Commission 4. Citizen Question & Answer Forum —All 1,V Meet Your Eagan Airport Relations Commission (ARC) What is the role of the Commission? Since 1988, the eight- member ARC has been serving as an advisory board to the City Council on the issues of aircraft noise and airport policies that impact or have the potential to impact the community. All members are Eagan residents who volunteer their time to serve the community. Who are the current ARC members? Chuck Thorkildson, Chair Carol Whisnant Steve Besebe, Vice Chair Chad Stambaugh Curtis Aljets Luke Olson Dan Johnson When does the Commission have their meetings? Meetings are held the 2 "d Tuesday of every other month (odd months) at 7:OOp.m. at Eagan City Hall (2011 meetings will be held in January, March, May, July, September, and November). All meetings can be viewed on cable channel 16 or online at www.cityofeagan.com. How can I contact the Commission? You have several options. First, you can contact the ARC staff liaison, Dianne Miller, Assistant to the City Administrator, at 651/675 -5014 or dmiller @cityofeagan.com. Another option is to e-mail the Commission at ARC @cityofeagan.com. Or, you can come to any of the ARC meetings and speak under Visitors to be Heard. What bind of work does the ARC do each year? Examples of ARC projects over the past year include: • Recommendations to the City Council on communication with the FAA regarding nighttime operations and the need for greater "fanning" of flights • Review monthly reports from the MAC, including noise complaints from residents • Make formal comments on the MAC's proposed 2030 Comprehensive Plan and forecasted noise contours • Hold at least one town hall meeting in a neighborhood directly impacted by airport noise • Receive regular updates from the MAC on new technologies being considered to mitigate noise • Meet with Eagan's legislative delegation to discuss airport issues facing Eagan • Participated in emergency management exercises involving MSP Airport and the City e.0 ARC SURVEY QUESTIONS (201t) Question 1. Since the opening of Runway 17/35 in 2005, has you quality of life been impacted by airport noise? Yes No Question 2. In which way(s) has your quality of life been impacted by airport noise? Loss of Sleep Interruption of Conversations (face to face or telephone) Not able to hear to television, stereo, etc. Vibration/Rattling of objects on wall and/or windows My quality of life has not been impacted by airport noise Other Question 3. When you find yourself bothered by aircraft noise, which of the following would you describe as your greatest concern? (check all that apply) Frequency of flights over your home Arrival operations Departure operations Late evening /early morning operations Other: Question 4. Have you ever filed an official complaint to the Metropolitan Airports Commission (MAC) via their telephone hotline (612/726 -8100) or online complaint system (www.macnoise.com)? Yes No Question 5. If you have filed a complaint, which of the following did you specify in your complaint? Early /late operations Engine run -up —ID Excessive noise Frequency of flights Ground Noise Helicopter noise Low flying aircraft Structural disturbance I did not specify a complaint Other: Question 6. The City and the Eagan Airports Relation Commission, an advisory Commission to the City Council, always strives to find the best way to communicate with residents. What do you find is the most effective way for the City to communicate to residents regarding airport issues? Community meetings Newspaper Experience Eagan (City Newsletter) articles City Website Programming on local access cable television Direct mailings Other: Question 7. Are there any airport issues or topics in addition to noise that you believe the City or Airport Relations Commission should pursue? 7/ i t. ^,"'�l" 4 ,3 Y i 'F'. �., ' -r- 7 z -"... t �'�z •.' �' - T 'r 4 -ai._z : . 2 �; 1�.. a � FF � i " �, 5 a z � L i 1 r �p ,�(j�' C�I y �''-4, . L'„.,...., - ' 1 " " , ' 7` — City of Eataa - - '1:5' ;x f n i z _7� c d_ v 1` _ a ��'' 1 Join your neighbors, Eagan Airport Relations Commission members, and staff of the Metropolitan Airports Commission to talk about airport noise issues in your neighborhood and learn about efforts underway to minimi the noise. WHEN: Tuesday, November 30, 7 -8:30 p.m. WHERE: Eagan Community Center, Oaks Banquet Room (lower level) WHO'S INVITED: Approximately 800 households in your neighborhood and . surrounding area . You are also invited to take a survey about the impact of the airport ! on your neighborhood. To take the survey, go to: http://www.surveymonkey.com/s/November I 1 . 6 1 • • , • h . a 1 1 • MEMORANDUM ITEM 6 TO: MSP Noise Oversight Committee (NOC) FROM: Chad E. Legve, Manager — Noise, Environment and Planning SUBJECT: FINALIZATION OF MINNEAPOLIS -ST. PAUL INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT (MSP) 2020 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT (EA) NOISE ANALYSIS DATE: January 4, 2012 1.0 Planning Background In July 2010 the Minneapolis -St. Paul International Airport (MSP) 2030 Long - Term Comprehensive Plan (LTCP) was approved by the Metropolitan Airports Commission (MAC). The plan revised the anticipated future development activities at MSP from those previously outlined as part of the Dual -Track Airport Planning Process that concluded in the mid- 1990s. Specifically, the updated MSP LTCP determined that the airfield capacity at MSP is adequate to sustain aircraft operations to the year 2030. However, the analysis concluded that substantial landside and terminal building improvements will be needed to achieve the following goals: • Provide sufficient, environmentally - friendly facilities to serve existing and future demand; • Provide improved energy efficiencies; • Encourage increased use of public transportation; • Minimize confusion associated with having two terminals and multiple access points; • Allow for flexibility in growth; • Utilize and maintain existing facilities to the fullest extent possible; and • Enhance aircraft operational safety and efficiency. Based on existing conditions and the capacity demands placed on the facility as passenger numbers grow, the LTCP determined that development activities that focus on the enhancement of arrival curb, parking and international arrival faculties will be needed at Terminal 1— Lindbergh, in addition to more gate capacity to accommodate existing seasonal demand and new carrier entrants at MSP. In general it was determined that the terminal environment at MSP will also -73 need enhancement in the form of gates, ticket counters, passenger check -in areas, security screening checkpoints and baggage claim areas. 2.0 MSP 2020 Improvements Environmental Assessment Overview The environmental analysis process is being conducted in compliance with both the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and the Minnesota Environmental Policy Act (MEPA). This process is guided by the Federal Aviation Administration's (FAA) policies and procedures for considering environmental impacts: FAA Order 5050.4B, "National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) Implementing Instructions for Airport Actions" and FAA Order 1050.1E, "Environmental Impacts, Policies and Procedures." Additionally, MEPA requirements as detailed under the Minnesota Environmental Review Program are considered in this process. After review of the federal and state environmental review requirements, it was determined that the implementation of the needed airport capacity improvements would require the preparation of a federal Environmental Assessment (EA) and state Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW). By way of background, an EA is a concise document used to describe a proposed action's anticipated environmental impacts, and provides a comprehensive approach for identifying and satisfying applicable environmental laws, regulations, and executive orders in an efficient manner. In the case of this combined federal and state environmental analysis, the process must provide analysis sufficient to: • Understand the purpose and need for the proposed action, identify reasonable alternatives (including a no action alternative), and assess the proposed action's potential environmental impacts. • Address all of the Environmental Assessment Worksheet impact categories as well as the FAA NEPA impact categories. • Determine if an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is needed because of the proposed action's potential environmental impacts. • Determine if a Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI) can be issued by the FAA because the proposed action will have no significant impacts. In September 2010 the environmental analysis process began when the MAC approved the resources necessary to begin the EA process required for the potential developments at MSP to the year 2020 (referred to as the MSP 2020 Improvements EA). At the May 16, 2011 NOC meeting the Committee was briefed on the MSP 2020 Improvements EA draft forecast aircraft operations and the Committee approved a public information plan for the dissemination of the forecast information to the public. Since that time, HNTB Corporation has been in the process of compiling planning data and finalizing development options for consideration in the EA process. As a result of this work three development options are being evaluated in the EA: the No Action Alternative, Alternative 1- Airlines Remain, and Alternative 2- Airlines Relocate. The Airlines Remain Alternative details improvements needed through 2020 that are focused on a scenario in which all airlines remain in their current terminals. The gate, terminal, landside, roadway and airside facility improvements in this alternative consist of those necessary to accommodate the forecasted airlines' growth at each terminal. The Airlines Relocate Alternative provides improvements needed through 2020 based on the relocation of the non - SkyTeam airlines currently located in Terminal 1- Lindbergh to Terminal 2- Humphrey. This is the Preferred Alternative in recognition of the fact that MSP's 2- terminal system could be utilized more efficiently. Several factors contributed to this determination: • Facilities at Terminal 1- Lindbergh, such as the bag claim, security check points and arrivals curb roadway are already congested. As passenger activity continues to grow, conditions at Terminal 1- Lindbergh will further deteriorate. • Different types of airline operations require different passenger facilities. Delta Air Lines operates a major hub at MSP within Terminal 1- Lindbergh. Approximately 60 percent of Delta Air Lines' passengers at MSP are connecting passengers who do not begin or end their trips at MSP; they simply fly through on their way to another airport. These connecting passengers do not normally use baggage claim facilities, ticketing facilities, roadways or parking at MSP. • Future expansion of the terminal and landside facilities at Terminal 2- Humphrey is more feasible than expansion at Terminal 1- Lindbergh because there is more available land and the supporting landside parking facilities have available capacity to serve more passengers. Based on the environmental review process, in addition to the above, it was concluded that relocating all airlines other than Delta and its SkyTeam partners from Terminal 1- Lindbergh to Terminal 2- Humphrey would relieve some capacity constraints at Terminal 1- Lindbergh while better balancing the mix of passengers beginning and ending their trips at MSP between the two facilities. This will increase the level of customer service, airport efficiency and convenience. The No Action Alternative represents the airport without the improvements included in the Preferred Alternative. The attached supplement to this memo contains additional details on the development alternatives. 3.0 MSP 2020 Improvements EA Noise Analysis 3.0.1 Existing 2010 Noise Conditions The existing noise conditions for the EA were based on the 2010 actual noise environment around MSP. The 2010 actual noise contour developed in the Annual Noise Contour Report that was published in February 2011 was used in the EA. The Annual Noise Contour Report containing all of the data relative to the 2010 actual noise contour is available online at: http:/ /www.macnoise.com /contourreport. Specific information on the existing 2010 noise contour INM inputs can also be found in the attached supplement to this memorandum. Based on the 435,583 total operations in 2010, approximately 3,972 acres are in the 65 DNL noise contour and approximately 9,277 acres are in the 60 DNL noise contour. Table 3.1 contains the count of single - family and multi - family dwelling units and population in the 2010 existing noise contours The counts are based on parcels that are within or are intersected by the respective DNL contour lines. Parcels with one dwelling unit are counted as single - family and parcels with more than one dwelling unit are counted as multi - family. All residential units within the actual 2010 60+ DNL noise contours have been, or will be, provided noise mitigation by virtue of previous noise mitigation programs and the completion of the existing program in 2014 as defined by the Consent Decree. A depiction of the residential blocks that have been mitigated, and those that will be provided noise mitigation by 2014 per the noise litigation Consent Decree, and the 2010 actual noise contours are provided in Figure 3.1. Table 3.1 MINNEAPOLIS -ST. PAUL INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT Summary of 2010 Actual DNL Noise Contour Single - Family and Mulit- Family Unit and Population Counts (Parcel Intersect Methodology; Single- Family =1 Unit, Multi-Family>1 Unit Population Reflects Estimation Based on Multipliers Provided by Met Council) Single - Family Multi- Family City Count 60-64 65 -69 70-74 75+ Total 60-64 65 -69 70-74 75+ Total Minneapolis Units 4900 1226 0 0 6126 1131 526 0 0 1657 Population 12495 3126 0 0 15621 2296 940 fl fl 3235 Bloomington Units 9 1 0 0 10 654 2 0 0 656 Population 23 3 0 0 26 1053 4 0 0 1057 Richfield Units 502 23 0 0 525 65 0 0 0 65 Population 1310 60 0 0 1370 108 0 0 0 108 Eagan Units 112 0 0 0 112 0 0 0 0 0 Population 315 0 0 0 315 0 0 0 0 0 Mendota Heights Units 2 1 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 P 5 3 0 0 $' 0 0 0 0 0 All Cities Units 5525 1251 0 0 6776 1850 528 0 0 2378 Population 14148 3192 0 0 17340 3457 943 0 0 4400 U.i 0 . ; cr 3 i IR - ..... - —J • u-, ,•7, - tg .... ...-- o . ......, 0 2 2 § q Q) o .45 ..;-, ... = -. 1'43' „, . Z 11 , ..c ...1 , r ,, .-... , ... , ...,.. I L-- -- -4 2 _ 3...._........... ,.... , a 4.77., . V 1 g . . ... .,....... ,,.. it a 1 'Z — _ • - C■1 ._. z Ts 8 1.1 -•,-.. z Cl a I s 03 1 s 8 1 Ilit 0 E _ co 41 1 Air ‘::( CS) 4 4 W -- "*"" 1 .... i...= ... 0 0 1 / t • 0 *1 E 1., 0 I 1 •••••• 11$1,- 4... E _ . . C3) . 0 .,,,,..„,.....” 1 ...I7 LIF •■•• S... ,,. z 2 . r• f i a Q. C:1 • . .- if ----- --- ra . / __J • 1 z '''''i7s ,,, ( , :/ •■• .1 I .t.- ' — C•1 ,:■• //,, , eg -- ,..-5..-'-* I/ 41 /1 , &N- ... ,, — . ,., ,....,,,, Z .,,,,,,,,,, . id 4 'N . ggliffifp4, , ' '4", CI. ',,,,„.' r: r.!g: 1 * .4c ._. Atii......• :- ,P.',. - ' s - " --. - -: ,.....- ---- ..,----- - sass. ittr* 4 % u• 7* .. ..'•=f "",** '''"' ..., I 111 '''. C , . 77 =:• 2 * j7i I ,7" •—• : ' +-A ' = C ... ... ... " 411=—, -t, 1 2 to z tc,- ,..- 1 - to , Ac = = I 0 Ot b 0 is ... 0 I 0 - „....., 4,. 0 Et. 45 , cp 0 ...... (4 (/) I 1 ils C 40 4D = Z ...- — 0 - — I --- O. CO (D ••••••4..."' ., . ,,,' 1 7 3.1 Forecast Development Options Noise Conditions Noise impacts for the various development options were considered. The forecast noise impacts, and any potential mitigation, are defined by the forecast 2020 noise contours. The analysis focuses on forecast 2020 noise contours in the context of existing residential structures in the Noise Study Area as is detailed in Figure 3.2. A future year analysis was also conducted using forecast 2025 aircraft operational levels. The 60+ dB Day /Night Average Sound Level (DNL) noise contour is considered the Noise Study Area. The input data for the INM analysis are provided in the attached supplement. The forecast analysis was based on detailed fleet mix and operational assumptions and the development of a gated flight schedule. This work was the fundamental input into the SIMMOD evaluation. The SIMMOD evaluation provided extensive information on the future airport operation patterns for the respective development scenarios. This simulation and the operation forecast documentation were the primary data sources used for the INM forecast noise contour analysis. --re International Airport 2020 Improvements EA EA Noise Study Area and 2030 Forecast Land Use Minneapolis-St. 3.1.1 Airlines Remain Alternative Noise Impacts Based on the 484,879 total forecast operations in 2020, approximately 4,440 acres are in the 65 DNL noise contour and approximately 10,943 acres are in the 60 DNL of the Airlines Remain Alternative DNL noise contours. Table 3.2 contains the count of single - family and multi - family dwelling units and population in the 2020 and 2025 Airlines Remain Alternative DNL noise contours. The counts are based on parcels that are within or are intersected by the respective DNL contour lines. Parcels with one dwelling unit are counted as single - family and parcels with more than one dwelling unit are counted as multi - family. Figure 3.3 provides the 2020 and 2025 Airlines Remain Alternative DNL noise contours and the parcels within the respective contours. There are no areas of sensitive land uses that experience a 1.5 dB, or greater, increase in the 65 DNL noise contour when comparing the 2020 and 2025 Airlines Remain Alternative contours to the respective No Action DNL noise contours. The FAA's impact threshold of significance is not met with the Airlines Remain Alternative. Therefore, no adverse impacts to sensitive land uses would be expected. Table 3.2 MINNEAPOUS -ST. PAUL INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT Summary of 2020 and 2025 DNL Alternative 1 Noise Contour Single- Family and Mulit- Family Unit and Population Counts by Parcel (Parcel Intersect Methodology; Single- Famly =1 Unit, MuRFFamilyai Unit; Population Reflects Estimation Based on Multipliers Provided by Met Coundl) Single- Family Multi- Family City Count 60-64 65-69 70-74 75+ Total 60-64 65-69 70-74 75+ Total Minneapolis Units 6226 1620 34 0 7880 1665 659 4 0 2328 Population 15876 4131 87 0 .: 3305 1195 9 0 4510 Bloomington Units 34 1 0 0 35 747 2 0 0 749 Population 87 3 (10 ` 0 >. 89 1203 4 0 0 , 1206 2020 DNL Noise Richfield Units 602 37 0 0 639 69 0 0 0 69 Contours Population 1571 97 0 0 1668 116 0 0 0 116 Eagan Units 147 0 0 0 147 0 0 0 0 0 Population 413 0 0 0 413 0 0 0 0 0 Mendota Heights Units 40 1 0 0 41 3 0 0 0 3 Population 110 3 0 0 112 4 0 0 0 4 All Cities Units 7049 1659 34 0 8742 2484 661 4 0 3149 Population 18057 4233 87 0 : :22376 4628 1199 9 0 5837 Units 6574 1900 58 0 8532 1887 698 4 0 2589 Population 16764 4845 148 0 21757 3687 1287 9 0 4983 Bloomington Units 38 1 0 0 39 747 2 0 0 749 Population 97 3 0 0 99 1203 4 0 0 1206 Richfield Units 703 93 0 0 796 69 0 0 0 69 2025 DNL Noise Population 1835 243 40 0 2078 `; 116 0 0 0 116 Contours Eagan Units 223 0 0 0 223 0 0 0 0 0 Population 627 0 '; 0 0 627 0 0 0 0 0 Mendota Heights Units 62 1 0 0 63 3 0 0 0 3 Population 170 3 0 0 173 4 0 0 0 4 All Cities Units 7600 1995 58 0 9653 2706 700 4 0 3410 Population 19492 5093 148 0 24733 5010 1291 9 0 6310 06 - al*Ir. 1 111""` U.I 116E5 11111.641111 M Q . teen m sl* Milli. . • m• i... ... • S e 11110C a. 11 41 . .... _____........... % . a cri isi ' 3 .■■ii c masa, maim --- ....-0111.1141■MM ..^ a. e • \I Kir 41 IL littpummomme ve _ Mi gir- Q , i i - i ° 4 , , a ___4 - H I g sp,,, 4 a CD ... N I t r- ..... II 1 , ll.' o a . w q 1 , • r / i i. g v. 2 • „, , a , • ,, • 0 4-- 0 r c , l f *. ,w1 i I 41 z '4.'44C _ ..., 4 0* . • & ET li '= ze• 1 i 4 .4.. iy. .., .7. a , „ . Ilb, 13 I i iii: reP 1 L # z . ... cri . 2 . ' f ct • • 1,.., U91; 1 3 e:. gip, 3111111 * 313 .011 Ali 1 • i U t . 011.■ '3:4 33* 0 a T C T, se 2 .4 1111 ' ■ • • i X , . , 11 "— illilitt am .. , ,, .......... . ,„ ,, , i t 1-1 • al i -- 4 , E ri1.1. fp - 4 , 4,, , • T i . gi 011.-bin L g Mo 911 1111 1 ' IliA 3 k '1, . .i A i r. . - "oil' •Nie (I) 01 rg s I \ * ' ' — 4) „L. c , ,-,,t.. 4 r , -1 .1/4 k,,,...„ t .4 .1 I r ,_; c i, . 1 1 = ... g g (') 11111 _ _ 1 NI Mli 331 il I ' _ ii ag al %.- — lin .. .„,,,j, I .. .33 ,,.. 4 n--, tir". el. 11 i ,...- 4 0. .„,..- ** & i ".',-.1 1-721-7 • ( ../ --• I .(tc 9 im. .0,..,..ri ill, ' . ,*/ .E., t i / ..i ,. t lig , . 9 I i W r. pit ',.,::: I - 1 - 41=1" 0* g4 11 # 1 C0 1 , - 1 ...,,,, Illilr ‘) ,, .. r'•• . ,1 . i c II Ali . . ,.,,, '`," • . . i i .... :III * / 1 * - 0 ' , 03.. ....,.. C . 1 kJ/ I 1 C3 I i a) 66 eatallitINISMN4111410001 , ,..., ,t „ .. 4* # 1 rif e / / ..... . ... .. i f 5 . l' A Lr) E , sira====.11' ,,„,_,°r,„r-,.,„r • , , I .,... .,-o:4 c I 2 . #0141111111 1 .Nrw, cv fret 0 -- -0. . - : 7 ."40 4 p ,_,,Ito • a . - . c T-- "r" 01 ,*,,, ........• , - ' ,.... - - — co Cf:k iD .......,... 4.• L. t ,... ,... mom 111111E.441000 0 < < 5 . . " 1 ": ' '-',.. . ',. , ..... ....--- 11 ..... ........ 1 , di gt, • 6 ° --- 0.1, * I - . ...-• - - 1, .• if amaneworamtwalm Armemit am mem= ......."1-i-i- tr 01114110111.41114141/40/4/=:=1 NI .9 ..,_,_..,„ ..... e t . ) ( c) ('.1 0 •i,:,) ca ,,,, = --....= ... .... ,,, ,.....-.............. _..... ....".... illealitatalt ..1' 1■= le"' MO - - - -- . """'1411/.111140114/0■14111111111.1141111 ••••.............moutziallt=4/4 " .,, ' Mil er -7....zz:: r - -'-,, : .= . =/.......... itio CD tn •*".: 0 Il'a ' ' - ''' 111 1 11=1111111111111101111M. 11111141. f=T E id C a." 7. - 4-, • sir, ......... AN . ..... .... .1 ..,... 14.01111111114411tre1111, ... 1/1144tosP4M1111141,1111014411140 s . .... ,.... E E E . z ....: ..,t - .............=. . CO .........= ........ 1 :t:t te:e ' 4 P am 1 111 InHe. ..."1" ""* =116271:4011MINNAMF4114 iNtlei". i ,.... t to . ,,. ,„. L aa , a 3.1 pe11111111111110. = .,...r..° \...-.., 11.1. 7 . a. ........, 2222 "F 1,.. mom. .c .1.=M .... allihm, ill _. ,.... ........ . .i - ..... .. I, _.1 z acl 0 r ..........,,,,,c ...,...=2..,ai p v am - _t,, is,4,7= .....,.... --C Z=Z:' „1:11.......:,0zr Al! I ,,, 41614 Ill."1".: ...aor1moh" . .." 1 " . t. ; il l ..m.r ... 111111 .1 11111111001010 A wig = 111111414140 I , IlltatIllle - ...,,,aminNeeksportweemmtipport a , awe ant° — i 0111Zr 4, j= g .. _ 11 „I ... .4...mii•-4 5 „,,,h° „,....... i = *mom ....... ak\ •• larciareiri r lin 441111117.1=CTITZt ,90 CO .% 814 03 411k miaow -.... --itogr. siiamillt 41, lerjate WO 40 NMI 111 4°4W" C 42.2,Z= .. uit c gi).==-. = t 11 .. 2 -- yr sommodlik 41 Wint MO ,. ... 0 03 . i Is. rei 2 ••mai „ ....... -- ' n .1 spi geo— •-• 2 z .............. =,7 .......... .. p, ....i. el (0 N Cf) _,.,..k. .,,"" „."'hIlk,..••••...acar..===. ".861:* --==g ...--B da p c) a ..........,..,,,, z.-401. is.......m......mosot mo.....* , fFillig__11111421.....,.... r „ in CL1 CNI I ours* mow am alimil nitissmito Mot NAM Oa 7.1,-,gi .......... m Ai ,det 41414111116141* al — as . 111101111110.0 ... \ ati4 to! 144ptemealital. ........... . " s awl* ._... ........... az. . 1 i 1 Tr sr.. al — 1 """..11 .11.11111t41111. 844....111114111111111111111112 vs cv a) 1 0 :Cave ssi=11 ---4,--n 1 1 _ - 0 v .., = .... Ismilint w a a) C 03 w t ir 0 k...... j 2 8 g 1 1 ............., .....,, ......,, ,----i mu as ......xak wow c 6m i.m= ii, —1 < 1411111 .... :.• f ali s, ri fi I IFIFINte git r 0 , 4 mr 1 6......., 44. * E) 4 ti - . 01 3.1.2 Airlines Relocate (Preferred Alternative) Noise Impacts Based on the 484,879 total forecast operations in 2020, approximately 4,441 acres are in the 65 DNL noise contour and approximately 10,945 acres are in the 60 DNL of the Airlines Relocate Alternative (Preferred Alternative) DNL noise contours. Table 3.3 contains the count of single - family and multi - family dwelling units and population in the 2020 and 2025 Preferred Alternative DNL noise contours. The counts are based on parcels that are within or are intersected by the respective DNL contour lines. Parcels with one dwelling unit are counted as single - family and parcels with more than one dwelling unit are counted as multi- family. Figure 3.4 provides the 2020 and 2025 Airlines Relocate Alternative (Sponsor's Preferred Alternative) DNL noise contours and the parcels within the respective contours. There are no areas of sensitive land uses that experience a 1.5 dB, or greater, increase in the 65 DNL noise contour when comparing the 2020 and 2025 Airlines Relocate Alternative (Preferred Alternative) contours to the respective No Action DNL noise contours. The FAA's impact threshold of significance is not met with the Airlines Relocate Alternative (Preferred Alternative). Therefore, no adverse impacts to sensitive land uses would be expected. Table 3.3 MINNEAPOLIS -ST. PAUL INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT Summary of 2020 and 2025 DNL Alternative 2 Noise Contour Single - Family and Mulit- Family Unit and Population Counts by Parcel (Parcel Intersect Methodology; Single- Family=1 Unit, MuRtFamllyal Unit; Population Reflects Estimation Based on Multipliers Provided by Met Council) Single - Family Multi- Family City Count 60-64 65-69 70-74 75+ Total 60-64 65-69 70-74 75+ Total Minneapolis Units 6130 1613 22 0 7765 1641 661 4 0 2306 Population 15632 4113 '56 0 '> 19801 3256 1200 9 0 4466 Units 36 1 0 0 37 747 2 0 0 749 Population 92 3 0 0 94 1203 4 0 0 1206 2020 DNL Noise Richfield Units 603 39 0 0 642 69 0 0 0 69 Contours Population 1574 102 0 0 ':1676 ` 116 0 0 0 116 Eagan Units 160 0 0 0 160 0 0 0 0 0 Population 450 0 0 0 450 0 0 0 0 0 Mendota Heights Units 40 1 0 0 41 3 0 0 0 3 Population 110 3 0 0 112 4 0 0 0 4 4 All Cities Units 6969 1654 22 0 8645 2460 663 4 0 3127 Population 17856 4220 ';56 0 ,'.22133 `.. 4579 1204 9 0 5792 Units 6662 2037 71 0 8770 1883 716 4 0 2603 Population 16988 5194 181 0 22364 3686 '.; 1329 9 0 5025 Bloomington Units 46 1 0 0 47 747 2 0 0 749 Population 117 3 `:0 0 +: 120 .,: 1203 4 0 0 `:_ 1206 Richfield Units 702 84 0 0 786 69 0 0 0 69 2025 DNL Noise Population 1832 219 0 0 . 2051 116 0 0 0 s 116 -... Contours Eagan Units 205 0 0 0 205 0 0 0 0 0 Population 576 0 0 0 576 0 0 0 0 0 Mendota Heights Units 57 1 0 0 58 3 0 0 0 3 Population 156 3 0 0 159 4 0 0 0 4 All Cities Units 7672 2123 71 0 9866 2702 718 4 0 3424 Population 19670 5419 181 0 .:25270 ,l. 5009 1333 9 0 6351 ti , f , in .. - _ tu : 1167:1111 iiiim , ; 3 . -..2 cu li., u ,.. .. _ „.... D 't,,,,,. intiTtE §10101111 i I I - -;;;'" .."' • . ro x 0 . , 312 misrais _ ........................_„*.. _....... CU minim 0. r la ' __, — um ,.. !MOW WWInsow 6a... Mi. nownsisM W ( 1 , -- RI_ Ara. - 4 rgitt ,ii ikii , iAt. , ■Ill 1 -0 I. Illi ap, 41IP 13) 2 4-. I 9 ** 111 . . a U i it . i \ hit ' 4 ii, , , A . 1, 4 f-Al foie 1 li>1.- 1 4 2, L ' l, 1 .., .1 f .- ,'' .., PK :I I "' L ts, r 5 i i 1 - . ge* ■-.--, i J - C3 i 2 IIN ql b , ." 2 , ) . , . ----- e s A . dip 4 * • • 1 °*.: r I t c / 1 6 .--,. ...). ... r, „rii 2 A ka. • 1 - - , 7 _7_ c i ca - --, a u ior _ ..o ollo i ... i l i t sii c ; ,. . 2° I i t t - .... , Ai. iltk , a , • 1 , - -,:: I, ,,, ,1 tg „.,,i lift- ....')r 4 e. .._.= ., , 4* , rl 21 .f.JI la c 111. min 1,4„ 9 * IIIIIIIII \ "__ At* d- DI 11111E 0 ,r. 2 8 al on & • ..'"°- 1 — 45 r N mil ilk- \ te •„__. i 1 1 :- . ,-, 2 i , ,..„ , 0 I? 1 ' r 4 . . ig . z * !” I 111 II 1- i a ' / , . L --- .- ' ili 0 • 31 i , 1,„ „ . ow r c ..,.._. ■ r , .ta . '' '-iss • -- k„ 5 L__-.-1--. ,..,_A var , •••• I 1 < El 1111 i 4-1 , iiii .„! ., .„:„. ..„: : ..' r--1 ,. ._____ __I .2-5 igi ....... 1 • z k it * 0 4, z H II' miEue i , e (3 7 \ '‘,...e` ii ...,,. ..- ,•• ...., e 1 „ c , . ,.....---- . .. t ,,,,,„.. ! ...„ , .3 i`,/ .,,... ;Fir 1 • 2 .. . /1447 .,... E ...,......... ,,, __ ...t ..... . ,,t, venimaerama \ . 4 . a) ; .6 - i cc I I ,..„. - 4......,........., 1., ..,., .„ . I . s c2. . '''', .....16 t 47:‘ I. ,, i it .• „22=11r; - -- , ifti- •"-- , 1;;/4 1 i .... ..,y, •_ 1 k g E -r 4.1.41===..r-.-,,- .. y i , -,_,.. •.,...-osglik 2 .9 : **** ANS la' ===4 .1 ° ''''' "*Ihr* ;:ii,;(*...•142/22*4111 0111111. ""`.. lia,11 ,_2(1) 1 i S Wrililr' -- s -1 rr"*.liz*.‘irvi 0.1 C'4 C\I t irr i; :11; ' " ' --': ati ,...^" Ei j 0 CO 0 s.. "..., co to a .. - > s... s-- CL , _ __L-:-.' ..." 4, 1 ..... 4 ' 1 •10,== jr "="14 laic Ili )- * e 0 CI) .-, .-- 4■111111* i I O ..... .... O < < mil _ c c a LO O 04 L`Ni ••••• 11 7''''' ''„, -Cr* *'*.=*:,"***,'-''' * ''''' 0•2111**1. 111 1 ""mule..."'""11111111111111111. aw " = "Th-r."1.111." 7111= (r) a R .., -- -----.-- z • .••••••••••••••...••• ,a) ••••="4,••••No , a) 0 ' J . ", '4'14 Viii ' austrit mum ii ............ ...,....... II < jr .- . • o 1 ICI •- ,,„, ..... .- .:• = - 2 ,,, r _ r„,==„„,,„.......= m == milt..__... _ 2 ; • +... .1 r .-,- -.it °-:.!: _., - ''''.. If i • 2 """";" =4272............ 0.0 g 11) CO - -.. -- ' Arvemi 'tt megramelasow .44* ammetanimmemmino om c ,, si 14-- a 0 . ., , ...... . ,.,,,, ........... ........ „.., . sans, .., - *Nom rittVgail .."' al OM CV ....111 - ,A10111110‘. jig, 1111 """ ...- ... %. .4. ....1 ii., - -.r... Amu gm wool I I = - E . ma LA law 2 a. miswi llej - ,' 7 s ""gl = 211111 4'4 a tr aMil mel:INI Zit E"lihr.""""aee.al.141Mall "W. - ......-- 411110411111.1111*** 4111011WWW0 WIN11111111111111111141111111111111111Wam "..... 111=== 6 : .... ..... _... iii .....„, co CO 20.**, , — Wilir ' f/iiii r ....., ,, ..... ..... .., ... . LE) ........• 2 go `' ........, ir e ir.....wou. si , ==2 . 2 0 az II cv clicv 0.= 'rag. .......Ammoksocilli ' 1.41R-alikaillilllivoirreiliPoThi ...9 ej... L.LELs : 1 2: -.3 wann.. wr qr. iminsult iii iii, CNI Z 13 2,ir soi• am 11 int•••••■••• 4so 11101111A MIKIS* 1 ... .11.1111P, alMa' .'" 1 a CO 4■• A t iCollairk wa 40. =22 ..s...0•,... ...ese —.4 yi k ,,,„ aft* C) C) (/) ..LItsit 111111111.8.00:1CSI".: =ft =11111041WW WO MIMI OW...WM queiga... iii ,,,, I 43 .„„,„ ED Cs4 ---". MI illiewarmrawasimme rim momempilar_mtlas_mang ..„,,,„,„ do yaw I "" woo 1111160•1111101110111111111111111110,1 0...... l j a artSUMINIELT6111111n WIZ "64 tela e4 04 (NI asssil vs If AM 4.1 1.- CNI a) CL 0 mamillit, r Is'ai,v••4. 1 - 1 I ca a) w ""reir's.... 1111.1111111111 1111T11111 , ) 1 .... ..........4."' ,.. i II CO i --row. ' I6, 'wail's.. I i re am 0 CD es .1 C kli1=1"...= .:11:1"WaTiiankfeir ...I ligi 0 k m oiLill 7 .... i f 0 w tt 11 ..-:- 411 .,e z_ ,„,,. illimoniiiffeit- V..13 f Al ......te ..to Err .=Z3 3.1.3 No Action Alternative Noise Impacts Based on the 484,879 total forecast operations in 2020, approximately 4,446 acres are in the 65 DNL noise contour and approximately 10,956 acres are in the 60 DNL of the No Action DNL noise contours. Table 3.4 contains the count of single- family and multi - family dwelling units and population in the 2020 and 2025 No Action DNL noise contours. The counts are based on parcels that are within or are intersected by the respective DNL contour lines. Parcels with one dwelling unit are counted as single - family and parcels with more than one dwelling unit are counted as multi - family. Figure 3.5 provides the 2020 and 2025 No Action Alternative DNL noise contours and the parcels within the respective contours. Table 3.4 MINNEAPOLIS -ST. PAUL INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT Summary of 2020 and 2025 DNL No Action Noise Contour Single - Family and Mulit- Family Unit and Population Counts by Parcel (Parcel Intersect Methodology; Single- Family=1 Unit, Multi- Family.l Unit; Population Reflects Estimation Based on Multipliers Provided by Met Council) City Count Single - Family Multi-Family 60-64 65-69 70-74 75+ Total 60-64 65 -69 70.74 75+ Total Minneapolis Units 6206 1611 34 0 7851 1665 659 4 0 2328 Population 15825 4108 87 0 - 20020 ': 3305 1195 9 0 4510 Bloomington Units 34 1 0 0 35 747 2 0 0 749 Population 87 3 0 0 89 1203 4 0 0 1206 DNL Noise Richfield Units 600 36 0 0 636 69 0 0 0 69 Contours Population 1566 94 0 0 1660 116 0 0 0 116 Eagan Units 149 0 0 0 149 0 0 0 0 0 Population 419 : 0 ;0 0 ' 419 0 0 0 0 0 Mendota Heights Units 40 I 0 0 41 3 0 0 0 3 Population 110 3 : 0 0 ` 112 4 0 0 0 4 All Cities Units 7029 1649 34 0 8712 2484 661 4 0 3149 Population 18006 4207 87 ` 0 '. 22300 4628 1199 9 0 5837 Minneapolis Units 6564 1933 70 0 8567 1852 712 4 0 2568 Population 16738 4929 179 0 21846 3630 1320 9 0 4959 Bloomington Units 46 1 0 0 47 747 2 0 0 749 Population 117 3 '0 0 120 1203 4 0 0 1206 Richfield Units 690 102 0 0 792 79 0 0 0 79 2025 DNL Noise Population 1801 266 0 0 2067 `. 133 0 0 0 133 >: Contours Eagan Units 208 0 0 0 208 0 0 0 0 0 Population 584 0 0 ? 0 584 0 0 0 0 0 Mendota Heights Units 60 1 0 0 61 3 0 0 0 3 Population 164 3 0 0 167 4 0 0 0 4 All Cities Units 7568 2037 70 0 9675 2681 714 4 0 3399 Population 19405 5201 179 0 ` .24784 4969 1324 9 0 6302 'i': (n ,,. a ,,,, , '.. til loll 31. maiiiid_.../ I .3-. , - - . *-, 1 C so • 0 if) Illitio,a s -iim .411111 ,„,,,,.. m).rni I I . , ... il .e. 23 f..... -*".: x L. . ..„ *sotto 03 .z.. ..:.-„,,,, 0 r** Hun eltametans 7 re armorrorealalli i.a. IMO* wwwwwffla ...., . 11. - ' I -= j a e . sir-- 1 2 ° ei f if, Our a) R ts 1 . 1 -., _ , itt I 1 W **. L VI 1 4( t . , 1 • a c.) 4.- a) 3 .,,,-Ai 1 fii 1 3 ' 4i o'• --....:. ' lit l:- lie. 0... a 4o• . . Z lab4a ."1 11 i 4 I 443 ,., i . 40 _ : 1 *fel f 0 • • 0 CD . • i Di P . ."" • fa *2 L i oi c CO ,t1 UM 0 II 13 ;CA i i 111 • 1 I Tg "i1 411‘ l a 1 1 1n 111141 . ,... .,. .,......... , ir . ..a. c,i-r1 - 11111111 - it, • 'ii r ° c La st C I t ‘ 4 4 ..."" ..,.„,/- . Pi' 1 " . . .. 4 _ Illrid , ..,, 8 1111 4 , # 100 -, ...' j p„ .,...), A 1/4.01 4 °. 0 1 t .‘ . f I 2 6.) li‘ A411 • • 1 ' ' '''' ' L ' Iii ' IL Airf . t ...,^- S 1 rof , i ..1 .. a , 1 . 1 1 4 U) i 1 sof , 7 I II& t - '-'-' 4..........,. I t 11111 , - 9 _ ik „ 0 E 2 11111 .,* 4 0 : 'k ' ONIIISI IMI Z Q k 1 i , 1 - • . ,.....„.1 .....,...s.,.... J-3. .....i 4 I „1 Li P1 " ili=rwir , 1 n * 4 „fp iiiritiol +I 0"1 .. Cti .. II , , •it„ # , I • . • li c l - «1) 1 1 A *1 i r ' er : r i ---,,,, 411 a) a a I Z -2 pvi - , ....< ..... \ . . ........_______ ' ip) / _ ,.... os ,,,,, it ,,. f■ ) 4 • ' ' ;1';11 .* Op ' 4.. § Ct. Z ittot < t 4 ..,.. .., .,,,,iii,, • .. ,„ - .1' i is rart4=lirtaser `r - 1. 44f"4/4"0 -4 1° , 4 " 0 hi __ .....---,. I I c Hi - a pmit-zzlid--7.5?-4,-.... .. „.....,..,.... low, 0 ....eS-Z- -3 2 " 0 EirigNImm .:::,-. ' - 4fi it 4it• 446,14 ' kkiliaL -..,,,_ .••-•,' 7.: k gi I c.) C - `"'"'"*. :- r .-:- - ....>: 11 4 , t y,i 11 ,1.: .... ,. 1 pfflIrr „.••••• < \I r . ,„,„,,........, .„,, 1 ,r, ..eit* ---• -_,...-..r.--',- - .... ' 0 , ,-- ' ,,, .... .., -...„....,-,...... ... 41181 . 4 . ^...., .. __,„ ... . a) CD L.. I l ' *::.. . l'Ii..." di g II , • 0 d , z > > 0 4 1** - "" ir ,. g CO (0 CI ,,,,, 411 1 ...,...,......,........ ...., -a = - - qt • t :::: -T:-.-....: .7;„-; .74.- .1 41111/1///M1///tVIMMIONSW/111% oo. 2 = 1 :4.1 ....... ..„, _, rj 4" mi iii - 0 ussummonwomarammals k .4 It> = 'Z'it;.,... ....°' :."! :„..":."' ", • '',,. ' Mrill/Willtalstrowasurawar 4„ c as=simio......... 7,7, 0 amimerairmaram .... . 44. 1.0 . 0 C CNI • 4.:„.44.4.4■4444.44n444". E miw•......wwm...*wm. am. c ci cl IN•VII . . ;) 4 . , 4.* . . , e 1 . AM 111111111111 22 . . (NJ Csa C z.- _ z- / ==.7."....mkettm = swot p=pg , 4111101111111111101111aMMIMMIRM a l 03 41 C) .. -2 ...... .... .• li -. i3 glem"'"mmu 2 " 111 `1111smiw 7 CIIIII:==== 1111111..11c4 r oo = woo . c:14 0 I I Al 1•11 11111./SOMMIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII 1/Mi= 2=1: . , Z ... a: 441.4 2 il 21==== amoymmossar.....110.01 1., it i • -4 .; . 0 C "r 411 'W - la 4: ...um imistwessuhss lot aril 111 le CV se • 1.1 '"'''''''" "' ill ° '"""" ormosmarra IIII $11111111111/1011 0. ii,... 02z: t 2 . i .16411846111431111111;44.01. L ... .......„ , .,. 4.444.2 2,1%, -.01 OC esmila s• m a 111 "a= at woW .... .............. ala rifIliMmelsoiltesommossams ).... MN Z - r "1 4111141140‘ 114.441141441111.11.11111111NIONtm• ....... 41•111.111111 ) 0 aa I 44 1111111111.111.111B I NIINIIIIIINA moommolliI 0 .'" ak . NT ' .0 111M=r1:4014. ? =ZOOM IIIIINEMINNOINIIIIIIII ti, ....„„,,,. 0 soo ai la IMONNIIIIP).11 wa WI/Nitta i (0 = mai aa ,,,,, gii 2 ilicilli. 4 a , aa ji a l , .NSIORIMIROPKS „, mom/ witilliel a. ... 1 10 0 .. S ....... 0 = a. .„. 14.1011111111 111 m F glip ittiiii, a........ II-- 0 A61.1a" *WI il 0. . 1 :: btu* - -tow: g Csi -I I 2 siiii*Numin10.4111$ lielfik a MIIIIIMPOIMM•01. ., I i . .0 0010111,11tallalig•tall t 0 . ' am 1 Z 1 : 1 4-* ow iirj 14 111111=ale a alamear MOWN 0 1. ____ % issigaimi. C 0 03 " la * iiriallanrassaw NSW& ....1111UOMIN ...1 1111411111 0 . 0 .. 0 . 0 ,... .... WWI imp amm,, in . : ea it I arantammerom ma" - 2=it iiiimommarpromi 01* irwi se 1 2 i 141 "*"." =fl• --;:..........2: m .... ........film... t m i,„..ia 1 -= ,„,„ a 6:16616. to 04 ( I) strammajt .....,=.F. 1001 "••• ... ir sae, ionr.,‘ law NI 0 0 = ........ ... 1 ... -.It 3011161“0111111611•1 . sari A *I aa c) c ° 1112 g'• ==n -ct......---ii 4.3 04 Q) 1 I 0_ =aossarna vows sirommtur. al ., 1 , al a) a) rci '7* ' ,,, .... i i 1 . ..• , ' ani i 1 IIF ai c a. ; Z g a) - 1 11 1M 11111MieW .,,, 0 C == 41$"1 131011■11411.1401P ' .4 %b jim , 11 ,,, mispl . p El. c?.5--- 4.0 MSP 2020 Improvements EA Noise Mitigation The FAA's threshold of significance was not met with either the Airlines Remain Alternative or the Airlines Relocate Alternative, the Preferred Alternative. The MAC has been aggressively mitigating residential structures around MSP since 1992. The current phase of this mitigation effort was defined by a Consent Decree that resulted from noise litigation brought by the Cities of Minneapolis, Richfield and Eagan. The dispute revolved around the nature of an expanded mitigation program out to the 60 DNL noise contour, as discussed in the Final EIS for the Dual Track Airport Planning Process. As of August 2011, the MAC has completed noise mitigation for all of the single - family homes in the 2007 63 -64 DNL contours with the same level of noise mitigation that the MAC provided in the 1996 65 DNL and greater contours. (Four hundred homes participated in the program.) Mitigation measures designed to achieve a 5 dB of noise reduction on average included the following, depending upon a home's existing condition: central air - conditioning; exterior and storm window repair or replacement; prime door and storm door repair or replacement; wall and attic insulation; and baffling of roof vents and chimney treatment. In addition, the MAC has completed 3,808 homes in the 2007 60 -62 DNL and has another 746 homes in the design and construction phases. Eligible homes receive one of two mitigation packages: 1) central air - conditioning and up to $4,000 (inflation adjusted, including installation costs) in other noise mitigation products and services chosen from a menu provided by the MAC; or 2) owners of homes that already had central air - conditioning installed or who choose not to receive central air - conditioning will be eligible for up to $14,000 (inflation adjusted, including installation costs) in noise mitigation products and services they could choose from a menu provided by the MAC. The mitigation menu includes upgrades such as: exterior and storm window repair or replacement; prime door and storm door repair or replacement; wall and attic insulation; and baffling of roof vents and chimney treatment. Finally, a total of 895 homes have been provided reimbursements for purchase and installation of products included on a menu provided by the MAC of approved noise mitigation enhancements in the 2007 60 DNL to 2005 60 DNL contour area. With regard to the multi - family noise mitigation program, the MAC has installed acoustical covers on the air - conditioners in 1,724 living units and completed the installation of new air - conditioning units in 255 living units in 2010 located in the 2007 60 DNL noise contour. Table 4.1 contains the count of single - family dwelling units and population in the 2020 Preferred Alternative noise contours and Table 4.2 contains the count of multi - family dwelling units and population in the 2020 Preferred Alternative noise contours. The counts are based on the block intersect methodology. This methodology counts all structures that are on parcels located on the blocks that are within or intersected by the respective DNL contour lines. Parcels with one to three dwelling units are counted as single - family and parcels with more than g(p three dwelling units are counted as multi - family. This is the same methodology used since 1992 at MSP to determine mitigation eligibility around the airport. The counts in Tables 4.1 and 4.2 detail the 2020 Preferred Alternative counts in relation to Pr previously mitigated areas and the changes in eligibility relative to the 2020 Preferred Alternative contours. Table 4.1 MINNEAPOLIS -ST PAUL INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT Counts by Summary of 2020 DNL Alternative 2 Noise Contour Single - Family Unit a nd Population Cou Block (Block Intersect Methodology Single Family 1 -3 Units; Population Reflects Esti mation Base on Multipliers Provided by Met Coundq otal City Court 60-62 63 - 64 65 69 70.74 75+ T Minneapolis In 2020 Forecast Contours previously mitigated Units 4546 1929 2227 6 6 8768 under existing noise mitigation program In 2020 63-64 DNL previously In 2007 60 62 DNt Units 256 256 2020 Forecast In 2020 S-6 ONt between 2005 and Units 237 237 Changes 2007 60'DNL In 2020 60- 62 DNL previously outside 2005 and 2007 Units 243 293 60 DNL ` � M x Total Uni 5076 2185 2227 66 9 554 Bloomin on In 2020 Forecast Contours reviousl mitigated Units 3� gt P Y g 32 51 3 0 - 86 under existing noise mitigation program Richfield In 2020 Forecast Contours previously mitigated Units 517 185 87 0 - 789 under existing noise mitigation program Eagan In 2020 Forecast Contours previously mitigated Units 148 63 0 0 - 211 under existing noise mitigation program Mendota Heights In 2020 Forecast Contours previously mitigated Units 45 0 46 � , � under existin noise mitigation program q All Cities In 2020 Forecast Contours previously mitigated U 5288 2228 2318 66 9900 under existing noise mitigation program ' ` In 2020 63 - DNLpr eviously i 2007 60 62 DNL Units 256 256 2 020 FOC ECaSt ., s... �tia^' U fa In 2420 60-62 DNL previously between 2005 and Units 23 237 Changes (Ali Minneapolis) 200760 DNL " ., . In 202060 62 DNL previously outside 2005 and 2007 Units 293 60 DNt Total Units 5818 2484 2318 66 10686 Table 4.2 MINNEAPOLIS -ST. PAUL INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT Summary of 2020 DNL Altemative 2 Noise Contour Mulit - Family Unit and Population Counts by Block (Block Intersect Methodology; Multi Family>3 Units; Population Reflect Estimation Based on Multipliers Provided by Met Council) City Mitigation Count 60-64 65 -69 70-74 75+ Total Minneapolis In 2020 Forecast Contours previously mitigated Units 872 520 - - 1392 under existing noise mitigation program ° ' Units 98 - - - 98 Additional Total Units 970 520 - - 1490 Bloomington In 2020 Forecast Contours previously mitigated Units 1065 1065 under existing noise mitigation program , ._. - .a Richfield In 2020 Forecast Contours previously mitigated Units 69 - - - 69 under existing noise mitigation program Eagan In 2020 Forecast Contours previously mitigated Units 0 under existing noise mitigation program Mendota Heights In 2020 Forecast Contours previously mitigated Units 0 under existing noise mitigation program' s ' All Cities In 2020 Forecast Contours previously mitigated Units 2006 520 - - 2526 under existing noise mitigation program Additional Onit3 98 - 9 j s (All Minneapolis) Total Units 2104 520 - - 2624 As detailed in Table 4.1, there are 256 single - family homes that were, or will be, provided air - conditioning and $4,000 for approved mitigation upgrades, or $14,000 for approved mitigation upgrades, that would move from the 60 -62 DNL noise contour under the Consent Decree program to the 63 DNL noise contour in the 2020 Preferred Alternative noise contours. (Under the terms of the Consent Decree homes in the 63 and greater 2007 DNL noise contour received the full 5 dB noise mitigation package. This estimate assumes the same program would be applied to the 2020 Preferred Alternative noise contour.) There are 237 single - family home that were, or will be, provided an estimated $2,902 in reimbursements for approved mitigation enhancements that would move from the 2005 60 DNL noise contour under the Consent Decree to the 60 DNL in the 2020 Preferred Alternative noise contours. As stated above, under the terms of the Consent Decree homes in the 2007 60 -62 DNL noise contours received air - conditioning and $4,000 for approved mitigation upgrades, or $14,000 for approved mitigation upgrades. Additionally, there are 293 single - family homes that were not eligible for mitigation under the terms of the Consent Decree that would be included in the 60 DNL noise contour for the 2020 Preferred Alternative. These estimates assume the same program would be applied to the 2020 Preferred Alternative noise contour. All of the single - family homes added to the DNL noise contours are located in the City of Minneapolis. As is provided in Table 4.2, there are 98 multi - family units that were previously not included in the Consent Decree that would fall within the 2020 Preferred Alternative 60 DNL noise contour. Again, this estimate assumes the same program would be applied to the 2020 Preferred Alternative noise contour. All of the multi - family units added to the DNL noise contours are located in the City of Minneapolis. A depiction of the residential blocks that have been mitigated, and those that will be provided noise mitigation by 2014 per the noise litigation Consent Decree, and the changes in eligibility relative to the 2020 Preferred Alternative noise contours is provided in Figure 4.1. q.? - iimalm war EU OW aijili Irt : Islia CC r .0.#;:= 0* X *46 15". ••••■ r e ci f IA . ,.... : ,... ....,,, .10tIlb***1.1.1111.11t all i ...• 1, 11.1111411111 MAN. 1111, J. : ''''', , . — - Iltfintt - -Ito mo iftstfilw —ild 1 / '' --- .-'7‘,... 016 \../ .-/.. • --_=, .. •••,..-..- ,.. (..) . ..s 4 * . , ' 141111 p r I TR/ lig Fl ' imi.,4 t4 ir., .....t.La 2 g E "0 1111114 : * 11 ,,„,-- . d.. ita CD 41140 -. -I 11 a " 4 wt. 1■40 cv --J ___.1... Ira ' o Z 1 ,..- mint; 4.7- • t 4 f / i I CDCNI i 11 ;iiii ,■,--, ' -;:,/, — 1 L4)'' 1 .1 .."' * rs ° • - '-'-' P I ., 0 ` ,,cN, so3LIA, co 2 , . „ 0 i co co ..• . l 1 1 1 1 H 0 0 0 4 f II i 1 " - - - ..,,, illoctuolasi , 1 --- ' 4 il> Ar ..4 ''',; E0 g 4 istin - c 0 . , , r a Ilif./4 -' ci ,--- ii i z1.. ,..2 ' 4f ,,,,,, 1111-14 L ws * . ' -' . -v-a' =.--Fil■ I. Z, c ', .i: - a -: ' '''' 4 - ''' it '77,,,.....,,- I ,.,, „,...,-„! ‘''' cr .1 1; . q as ....„ ,- - • i 11611t '.,,,, , e = tf) If i a ,••• ma li ?- uPoi ti: i f- Apr ' / . ,..; a., a) 4 1 1 i ' ..,. 1111f t C I a ,,,,17 1 ■ "*.■ 4 ' ,.- • Z C = 8 §. < 'Ar !,'-. ituisilL22* 40 \ k , 1.1 '1 , 0 I- n, 1 - _ .......0,0 eliti -.... , a itraiel N ,,,..., •• wear/ 04' e E. g ! .1 2 •-•-• I Ili '''' '''''''' - . / 1 v, - ......,,,,...... 1 1 • - , - ...- — - - .,f "7 , . , ''') ,,, , t ..". / 4 : I it ,.... •1=22szso '',$`,‘,..,,,, dip r, ir. , -If, .; 0 .1.,,S a "ArtiCiF="' ,Z ,:;;;54..c.r Er ' i'-' .1.#;■ \ 410iiilikilifilliati1111' fr co rg4,-- ' ' 4;zr . ,. i " ''' ' lir IIIV --- . fillo: ' -. (;) s '''' ; il ., 0 i "" o z --- - ' qt 10 - 4 -- ...„,...... 0....r..-- - .., 4. • - - . ---- o - --. 0 L. .t• —.....ligew Azt. ,- , : 1 c o - Z Al i • , 0 = t .,..: .,' g 73 :74 - , ...... 4 :It ...,,, .... . ., , 6 1 zr_ , .-....,-, .. --..,. 4 .v.i... amt ,..... 14 loalsr--,....=,... am w c\1 lc - s ' . ' - .Z# er.'4', .....-1.2=t= la •""1111N—'"'".11rd \ g 0 4- ...... 2 ti..'t 'A°As'Ji P.il..7. ..,,,...., 7 ° °' :::111........74 ill 40=0•1=www .4....a...... p '''''' "" ' 'it' :' ' ----411e, ==.4==m- Reg .=.....--as- .7.,— \ , ..% ,,,,,,...) ' . . '" /4r, , . 0 . 0 0, ..., .. (..., . z . .. ... ....... ..., ....„.. : . . .,..........,, = ..., ma. room 00 me C **00****•■000140., mamma ****.40 1 5 s 2 """* ' (13 illa cr- 1 . 4 " 1 , , V i ov-*-15 *el' mallItEie 15 : ...0., W142 gm 8 4 2 8 n, ...:, z=204- 1 :4=16....... it 4.=== 1 ...*.---".== , - "---," — i *ills J...44 i ,22,.. 0 .................. ' "' strielt . .r.=2., 0 VA,.../....'"` ...........": W ." %at IMINIt ' gli I -.=.% z 3 g g c ......: 00.0 -„„ . ...= .. a 8 `7. 5 4- :.... .• II l'' ... 1 411 ,4 SEE i '". z --=011 lox 1r el . got e r E . . ...) ...1 ,..$ C 0 ====111111....* vsmoot — 11.1.....0... = MI .." 4 ...... UM, ••• OZZZ si. ......................s. ....... 11.01.1.401.01, .... ilii,,--Eir.,:ca . -- -- i ... 44 ... .... c - i pi e 0 N 0 0 0 gb l' Cl C•1 iv I. C '''''""' ""." "="2:1■1:1.14=1.1 :12=iiiraill. 1 , , wrirdi gal ....r-r1 ko „, = 7"." - ,1 , 4 c : .- ...= ...... =,..0*........................ .......... ... ; 1 . 6 0.7 0 ,......., tog a ami ......"1 - - E c4 04 04 - - T -- 7.. - m4L11 #51, ra NI mar ma trow.oveamposons 44 0 0 ft t 1 .."' 1 Jill •".16. ...... ........ amos. — iTir,iiinitirrillialimeli AIM 0,...,1.. ear.: r colrli raw 46 I Ss' 4, ,..., In in 03 tiU amiliwilWiydatrigaPiltrilii tarepAl - c,I 9 . 1 t, I 0- 411- ) 4 . ,.....,... .....r.=== _, ii.,„......„ i ,. , . i 4,o 0+2111111Nr4 1 1 4 1 111ill="igerr' Alin I ."' I , =', t kir. *IV ( Illi ill . VII *.***k. "" 40.4 ■ .... 741/60 4 (/) =--.1 a 1 ,.. 4146•1 1 =gent ea "al Ir' 1 WO - -'°-' itiiiplihR ...- ... - ei Vivi!' as at IP& yip , ,,, 9 .— ' =Ii...- , •• • - ••••••144P.t On . 11111.111641:14 alfirAms 2 — rAr - -- - 1--r-st setr" # um% I r ' i 41 I, t 0 a 0 gg ,• ,.. I - -, , 411 " 4"` 0 E ..a - zac ‹ 2 - - ‹ ... z - b m lee tip.- E 2 -- 10 .,„giliginards % -In ' .44 ' ''''''4".4 U"' IF" - 11114 Li gb In consideration of the circumstances unique to MSP by virtue of past mitigation activities, the terms of the Consent Decree, and the local land use compatibility guidelines defined by the Metropolitan Council, it is proposed that the noise mitigation in the EA relative to the 2020 Preferred Alternative be provided in a way that is consistent with the provisions of the Consent Decree. This mitigation is intended to build upon MSP's previous mitigation under the terms of the Consent Decree, offering the same mitigation, per noise impact level, with eligibility defined by the 2020 Preferred Alternative DNL noise contours. 5.0 Summary of Forecast Noise Impacts There are no areas of sensitive land uses that experience a 1.5 dB, or greater, increase in the 65 DNL noise contour and or a 3.0 dB, or greater, increase in the 60 DNL noise contour when comparing the 2020 and 2025 Airlines Remain Alternative and the Airlines Relocate Alternative noise contours to the respective No Action Alternative DNL noise contours. Figure 5.1 provides a comparison of the 2020 No Action Alternative, the Airlines Remain Alternative and the Airlines Relocate Alternative noise contours. Figure 5.2 provides a comparison of the 2025 No Action Alternative, Airlines Remain Alternative and the Airlines Relocate Alternative noise contours. 9/ 1 / V) * La is --- MIE e i , ALLL....---1-7'-i t I alli - ,' L .,c ) : w , . CO • , , , , i *it 11! Lk , ,1A - D 7 m l it‘ . 1 _ , 1 ' () 1 , „,, 7, =, ,,„--11 sill Alp • i „4:; , ,i _, --t- f--, - , 73 a 2 ,---, co 0 I , 461' .0 t ' 1 I, ■ 1 / *.**' xx.,)41*-- I.) ci. •■ ° * ' x i * \ At ,L) ) , 4 ir v4 1 4 . I (-) e . ',...= • rAfir or 1_. ....„,/ 111 >-- f V 8 S ii 44. I)" rwi 0 , t° , A I., , E ..,1 , _ ,,,---4 10 (.....r.„ C ..* 0 lit ), -,-, [ 1 Z J 1 te 4 1 - # w Rau , . ., / , ,.. . . u f . 1 = . • t ...,* /""" 4 t 4 k i ,.. ' 0 f e l -f----'7: *.. ,-- .- .... < , . un , LA_ ‘, 'k 1 i t 4 ......, ..... 2 / i ‘,..(e" "It .....--•- a) 13 '+? Z ‘ ". i Z g 4... .., ,, i i i . , / J, ■., .+1. -___ Z o . i E ,,,e.".■ '‘!"1/4....i / 40 ," ' N't : a a) Al& Alliiiirewerma. tiNkl\sZ.49rii. o ..,ifio, t / i r 1 g f I , Z > 1N11111Pr 11124."04,1"jrl.' *** 1 if l'It , OP k •••„---- ‘ Ca - Z 1 e a e 4 , .., 0. 1:03.44.30.321::: i r Nol 4**„.1i. 'AL:Vail It0:4'm'IPp4,11 °11"eari° ..4r. ( (CID) , ..., ..... ,1 1 . - 12., . 'spin:* 000 „, c's1 A• - :" ' - , ' ft 41.‘4,4hooli.t.:11,0.-,--,-..-- ' , O co > . c . , IL. fu (Y) k L .. , O TC Acropot.4600 ,,^'---01.3 0 „.. .._ ..... csi ..........d-..........._ ji , „,_... im.,,„„.. , „...) ..... -0 . . -4 4 C ° NE ff - '''' Ali "" IN infoi•stsagrzit_,eli 1 7`: C•1 -0 ( CL . 41. - x * 1 .2"*"*MOCNI,VIN".10.11.1.11 all " ale....t iftit=.••••••111M .°'* C ...I n) Z ,_,. ......main il -- - , - . ,,,"*'.., o ' llii manussoarjanigtail l al 1•11•161==twol°41•11■••,.., , -,"'' --I -. 0 < Malb .. owe - ..... x ' ° ix . =111F7116110411.1= III allellialittrftftli=ria = .± Z Z 0 ..=...... ,......".,_.- . ,,,-..... oft often MAI11111.11Wffri ift= _ .. _ rel IIVIII ,... N. * ***. x ._,,,,, aftlftalM4111141•23/1= al 411, 0 0 r• .... Ift1111111.11 A„,,,,,-...., , 7 111111 4°4" ap...., _ - ...- - .. ... . „.... . -=.1= imemmumpc fte ale C: • ' 1 M 11".16.1" a 1 mos. ...... _..... cp . -, _71 s ==2,1=Hriorsturo ... 1.12,....=,...... ... 1 = . or o = s':121=Astsmatio = ."...2r, ' ' ' al 1111101■0000 1.0111 sw .0),.\ 10: , .4.4......4 , 20 iimemiaing ai -7 ,.... 31 =112 P .,0 ‘ ... ...... ....a.;:,..1111r ,, lasibt. IT's r.7,=1;1. - aim ::-. =Imityr, ,. dez 11=.... alai - L ... 2... ... C C erais . ammesselMF Nal rr . r . „, tc ,,,,,, it. to ri gib. ...111 ` :Zia ■ " 4, ft Mmi t m emer "MI 11111110 ....4.111 %.,/ =mew OK 0 Z.,ftftftaftwismemftimialimmfts 4.4 "IlMil 44 "1"..61. - ''' gg 81111".."1".1611 03 mi 3, 0. a) a) 4D C _inalrilmia"" ...... limm,*', g • ,,.. t.'"..-...-r 441 .---...- .s.,*--...z.....---1111Pii - -cs 73 t .A ... 4411111.4 x: „, arjaidINLIII•1104111 * --_, 1111112/1101.. , milliallIMIIIIII ait away ussier! - a arunromainlOomigar. 0 - 'N .„, ostior Ilka. =pia X 4". = co co u - l ararrrrama p 01 = arm "i4r.lar. 111414,444tistallt meratimar.... ,,, Ims. ,... 00, , rim, alli=""Tel Ili a 75 ....,......„....... ,4,2...ratzer r„ im ... mg ae, 1 I I < Ct. 13 4 ai Ziot Q. 2=1.004;== ' ,immizaim4.1111 ,.. 4.. ro M,41.1.2.16,,,,,42 = ow404,44 _., ,,,,„„ , "nun • 0 ,, .0 S 22,4=4„,,„,„ ° ,,L... ssv!as au agog 1 f III .161*6 ... A .1.1 rill c =IC MUIR =ftft11119111 1 4 1 ,....f i , , ........, ...... , ........ ......, , . (I) - - 4. alltall111111 SINIIIIIIIIar . .. .... mimatimai . _ 4, ..._ OM 11. auZXSPI".4. =r0 an=r111111121111raMMI100 VLM141 ° • C » , nj ...... ...mon 101•1 wcift 44.... 4111.144 \ aft NI ta• itilMit a-pi.. pftftiftelmalaMIN41411 , ow' iiiimms g 44' • - al 0 NINO aftftftftaft .,,, t C • ti E E = =al .10111* 2.1411111=21r.MM . I 1 ca, In awkommi ""'Imommoriv,""- j- 1 , -‘14141 co z (1) par :AI I A m ralp. a 0 01. v„,k,, 2........ 1 giro." r„ w z :_l , c I-U II, .- . 0 0 von. r ' 1.111 tr ,„ , ,,,,1 C --J ,■■ 4144111111144044 ,....a.m,.. „„,„„„„„,,, mom gir ' .... == „,„.. i eistab a 1 " 1 " iiii _ ase a si a qD) al . • ....... ,.. : ..,,,, .. ki , . 1111 , n tx im 104- ;mina r -----,,,... / \ „„..._ 0 . +4 ,4 .... 1 , .., 0 -- , . „,,- , \ / , ...... a 4. ,... ,..... • ,4 . . ... — atiwit, 4, ,.., It. Vit 4, a s q 41- sy lel 1 v ff. - . if t 3, 4 4 iii , 1 3 1 • le,- ,,,, R .6. 1 I l'' '.1 • ( Am. re , ■ I g C lit* * , - ` tx 1 I --"1/4 L ...„ (-ITT isi co T • .....4. I ****•-' / e , ,,,,,,,,e f. .. , , o ........,, , • ts 0 • do 46. , _ A 1 W r jt a Z 5 I g . 0 r CO 6 , 4 U (,) It , l _ tl I i ,.., ■ --' 1 '-' ao f N k-- Licri - 4 16°V s--1 1 PI 11111 III ' 1 1 ' . 3 4 i --.----.. --...i ,0 ,.. 4..... V (..,j.„‘ Nk.. el C) I I ir" _ p „ ...., t - ..wrommlIllr -- i , '-- (i) or - if ..... ,,,--- . I , / - a II . ? A 4 0 2 4 .1 ' 4 • ° 42 g a, _,....„..,. l ipilf 40 lit 4Z t i frof 3 0 * 0 oozy. _ .:::' ..... . .. . , oft t , ,....i ... 0 • _ - I: .D. cs4 C\ y ,..,,,,,_..1.s.:1 •:,:.t......,....._,_,-,1:,...10.---, _ „ 0 N > 4... L. ` ' 1**:01 1-- Vilila..411111111 0FIW ' le '''' '''. CD .412 > CD il ........ kne... s " 1..... 4) < - -- .10, it.,_ ,*" , ..` _ _-• "Ar.If 4.1••=6.0.00.....ai ituslio...*=*•11m2=1:i (N — -a = " I " ' - ""°' °Y ' - ""11= 1 * - E'll=2.01 ii titimenossmilmassorstairgespro - -0 tti IL - m !"-1 " . - "›.• ::',./: ********1******10101111011. 1111111111111111111111111 112.... C ,__I f 03 Z m ...I -J ca or or, - Z Z „ a 0 0 co CI if .............. ............ 0 0 „.... asaammeataware . 000w000 0,...0 ...... 0 0. CO CO ID 12 mailemeteas , l aborkeepsommatair at a 0 _ .... C ' naor. .....- ....2.*- - ....;„; aramtl Joao AA a .... . ...... sa awn • L.. ail, 4=1 - ..11 4:6"114 I " - 5 12:211 I 4114.""" e " L (2) .. - .:1* , ,..1: : ........me p ....; 1 ... am acm.... - ....... .... it....okrik ....„ cc .. .. 2 , C $111 t ---.0..4 CO viessimoissapn=AM mil C3 = C C ..., , -, Amessvaises, . alleil. '''',:' =MUM ill * ,..„, 1******11111 t Iiil***10* .1111•11111111.11111111111111 CO < 0 0 0 a) = ligt .7-i - alota..- i -i.- ....40.•=....41 4* "INI - .... wow 75 CO ' - 6 lc% / a• MILtrizi:d e ali -, r girtiriii„,..-11.__== ars 1 4 . --6 co o c o al 0. L'', 4= i # t a• 1 mum : :... 1................ 3 Nil Mil C 11111M*11.11* ANION . */* 11101** • k. al mis Ng c me I *wow* IMIL**. " CO i a. OW *.. ■C =111111115,11****110 OMR OWN* ** au , Cr) = ** xi metzlgwommair swam .. 11011010.4111* III ..111 NM 20 MIR tall 1 m rims is:=.1:4===="4 mesilinsimayallos em "...ilea' 112 40 mil i , Ai u) !omi ,..... ...Ls.r . 0•0 21,2 6 imi, •.-- N ..... Za7=r, =wrokramaxs ., IIIMMOII*0* OM 11•111111111111111071/*/* _ C > > I r `- II liPar 0 1■•• compoi MINIIIIIII *111111INNINI*11•W P IN. 1 ta. '..'"..4* 2= i 911.11•6:120; r i t i *- c) '5 <- c E I. ra Wail ***' .... *UM i 1 ,,,, ..,..,...k VI j'A'3N1 is , 0 0 (I' 2 III a) 6,-at....... a's i -.1 , - ir&...... - r i, c..... 1/4W...0 ,...„ ---,- c V=4 ....,H1......wit. r , .4m , „„,,, ta 4 a, (.9 ......._. ...... ,.......,,, .....,........._ "ie. Ireffliiiiitaft.11 _ t$ -7 \ -1 l a ) W 0 I ' --I Z : 1 _, 2 174 17 , " _..„„,,,..Thi .........., k ............ s'ai. so' imit E ... C:i 3 As is detailed in Table 5.1 and Table 5.2 there are only minor variations in 2020 and 2025 between the No Action Alternative and the Action Alternatives when looking at noise contour acreages, and the unit and population counts within each contour. Table 5.1 MINNEAPOLIS -ST. PAUL INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT 2020 Comparison of DNL Noise Contour Acreage and Affected Units and Population by Parcel 60-64 65 -69 70 -74 75+ Total 2020 No Action DNL Noise Acreage 6511 2797 959 690 10956 Contours Units 9513 2310 38 0 11861 Population 22635 5406 96 0 28137 2020 Alternative 1 DNL Noise Acreage 6502 2794 958 688 10943 Contours Units 9533 2320 38 0 11891 Population 22685 5432 96 0 28213 2020 Alternative 2 DNL Noise Acreage 6504 2793 958 690 10945 Units 9429 2317 26 ' 0 11772 Contours Population 22436 5424 66 0 27925 Table 5.2 MINNEAPOLIS -ST. PAUL INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT 2025 Comparison of DNL Noise Contour Acreage and Affected Units and Population by Parcel 60-64 65 -69 70 -74 75+ Total 2025 No Action DNL Noise Acreage 7373 3159 1122 763 12417 Contours Units 10249 2751 74 0 13074 Population 24374 6524 188 0 31086 2025 Alternative 1 DNL Noise Acreage 7336 3185 1119 761 12401 Contours Units 10306 2695 62 0 13063 Population 24502 6384 157 0 31043 Acreage 7330 3149 1124 761 12365 2025 Alternative 2 DNL Noise Units 10374 2841 75 0 13290 Contours Population 24679 6752 190 0 31621 Note: Sum of acreage may not equal total due to rounding; parcel intersect methodology; unit count reflects single - family and multi - family; population reflects estimation based on multipliers provided by Met Council. Committee Action Request that the MAC Planning, Development and Environment Committee recommend to the MAC Full Commission that noise mitigation in the Draft MSP 2020 Improvements EA/EAW be provided in a manner consistent with the provisions of the Consent Decree, offering the same mitigation, per noise impact level, with eligibility defined by the 2020 Alternative 2- Airlines Relocate DNL noise contours. cq, Supplemental Attachment: Development Alternative Specifics and Integrated Noise Model (INM) Inputs 9S- Development Alternatives Specifics Alternative 1- Airlines Remain Alternative The Airlines Remain Alternative includes the improvements needed through 2020 presuming that the airlines remain in their current terminals. The gate, terminal, Iandside, roadway and airside facility improvements consist of those necessary to accommodate the forecasted airlines' growth at each terminal. The specific gate, terminal and Iandside requirements are identified in the EA. The improvements included in the Airlines Remain Alternative are listed in Table Al and an illustration of the Airlines Remain Alternative is presented on Figure Al. Alternative 2 Airlines Relocate Alternative The Airlines Relocate Alternative is the Sponsor's Proposed Action and includes the improvements needed through 2020 presuming that the non - SkyTeam airlines currently located in Terminal 1- Lindbergh are relocated to Terminal 2- Humphrey. This Alternative was conceived in recognition of the fact that MSP's 2- terminal system could be utilized more efficiently by relocating all airlines other than Delta and its SkyTeam partners from Terminal 1- Lindbergh to Terminal 2- Humphrey. This would relieve some of the capacity constraints at Terminal 1- Lindbergh while better balancing the mix of passengers beginning and ending their trips at MSP between the two facilities. The improvements included in the Airlines Relocate Alternative are listed in Table A2 and an illustration of the Airlines Relocate Alternative is presented on Figure A2. No Action Alternative Consideration of the No Action Alternative is required by NEPA per CEQ Regulations. This alternative serves as a basis of comparison with other alternatives considered for detailed analysis. The No Action Alternative represents the airport without the improvements included in the Proposed Action. The No Action Alternative includes some airport improvements that will be implemented prior to the completion of the EA. These improvements are independent of the Sponsor's Proposed Action and have already received environmental approval or are categorically excluded from formal environmental assessment by the FAA and the Minnesota Environmental Quality Board (EQB). Table A3 lists the improvements that are included in the No Action Alternative and an illustration of the No Action Alternative is presented on Figure A3. 96 4 ...„e, i ,..,.. . -. „:„ ,-..a.,,, , - --,..i. ,. ,r7...szy, -,r...,..t:,,_,,,,,, 14--,,4. .1 -a II # 1 ." 0 t .., ,,,,,.. ., 4. I i t : _r_,` ' ,' ■ > 4,i 0 cz.7,p- 4,1•,, ;f. .f. i ' t r 't:- E 11 l'r , - L'.- a, ,.„...,-, tl) f I ..... , ,, .., .!... r..-, , ..,,:ii. .1 t. z p...,T,),3,..?„, s... 4- .„ -.:i t.; ' ' - -7 t='- N.7...`g E :.,,,,.* -,;;;,,,, si , .., ,,,, _ . t: .-2,,,,,e,,,.9 - at ,,. -' ::(- ft' N \ 41).t, r-(r.--. ' L i?'-'4'iu,,,', -z. ''-'-• ;4- 1 i 1 ' ,,,,„:04 „..: ‘ ( - '- $ : S A .. a ii ' ',: ' 7 ';. so' .,„ cc-:: . g. . f s ,, / „ I li %,.., - - - e 2 I/ el' I- ' ., .-) 5 ,..„... ) / .,,,,.. g i I* 4. t r* „„ \ ,:\ lf°. ' 1--- ' - 1 ' t. , e ,-' - it .9_,K, --,..,.. i; «,,,,..1" 'li ic ,..° , , .,,,,, , ,itz, „.,.,- , .,, A 1 .. 1.1., ii 1 ,4 „.„,,, ,...14.... , ..„, ,E.,,, ,--...,r, ----gp i: ..' , ' -,,,..,at4::, I ti .1;- s'' c2 /4.,40,/ = - ‘'''s° ''' ....,,,11../- . ' / 4 ,.. itty, ! i ,,,,,,- ' 411 ., - - :: _..., ,, .;,., ts-474ir:".:1 i :, !,:1...i ' ' . ....:1, ,,,,,, ,,,,. -..' f Ili' ' 1:t:7", '.: til 4 '' IN ' : iy• Vi , .,,,„. ) q , 29 --, .1i,:t;,&.::::il 4011%. -4r, 0 . Ar. 3-04 1 , ,P kk„„4„,, , , O ., , , , , t* :%e ,, A 4,0, , V. 7 ' 4f., r - r' 4 \ '''.,"4',.. (,..,. t..41 , • `', , ''. '`..,,,.. ' 4 444.21„4 * -, - ,. .L.-,<•,.. - . '--, - -. , .. ,1-.--- . . / 0) ;7 //S. . , i: ,,, i i 1 ._,, , ,„/ t- (1 ",/,‘ a '--7.-.:...:, i I i ,..1*, ,,,,...,„,`,,,--. g, i .,,,,......t, .1..,. '1 1. . a ,./---'s ) lati.,' - ' -1-.,..,-, a*, 1' : 01 i / 1 1 E ! /47 i ' ;':`• - c::',...., '' %–''''' ,.,,,......,6,4 1110. 4,41& A •.rt, . ,„ :,zZ,S7- 't,„. i I , , ,r,-; ; ...; „131. :-.: ...ey7.-- .;,.. - -i-,...^,- ;0. 111 ,- :: ":: ,-4''' . :,.,.„ ..1...., ....,c, .-tn ."'- -' «'-'f'.:,..,''...■ i - 1 -''' i.----_--,..i.' 4V:_ mial— w ,..-.;', -- "-,„ ,..-,-11,1-z ,,, ... = . z-.1,..1 t ," -- - ; 1. ' - rn,t-' .....•:-..,--3 ,-. '...-- -.1+-1,-, 1 ,, , ° - - q `g )•°#: ,eixs,..1 c ; ° i ° .a; illitit x -Ft: .. I rc - . •-• - :',...":„. ' I — - : I ! il l . 4, '1:: ,1) I ' 4 . . ''''' , . 1 E ii t' k :.E:),E. t,: k i c -1 kf . ... - -. 11 i ° •••1, g D. _.&:.PL g t., - i-,,,,,i - '' - 1! ,-=-< ..... c%. 1- if iz5, -,, i 1 1 ; . I ; ,., !II 1 ,:t _, i 1= E-: . b-, ,,.', ,,, ..„... --, .4114,„ ..,„! -,,, .;:',..-. 4 .L._•,, 1 : \ .e. ;,--: ,, .,r,r,,, -- iw - = --'..-st., ...' -.'' •-.. -i14, ni.,:\ ....7,.. .. .... ..., \,, .,.. .,, , , .... ,, .- ,7f.4 ir -:&,,, .' ,A.:: er, I, -, ° Igsl=r, „,4 -, ';',, ' &:: '.'2i'''s A p P ,, - , ado , srr / ''''.. r , i • / '..t..;,-: • ..-••• -. --,-; be: is,-..' - • .. .. 4 ' --rm"-3 AiN IP* t, l ' 17 'grip N.,_ IL - ' 1 \ Ilik 4.41, ..416( • „!:,,,,,.,,,., - f i iz 4. t„,,, ,... 42 • ,!, -, -,- ..,- . ,, .,„.._,,,,,, i i ,,. ,,,,, ,.„. , ,,,, , # i 1 .,... i V ' / , 1.4.7 4 14400 A ci. 1 ii , ,r,...,,,,:,. / *4 4 so - ,c'• ir- - / „__--- ,....„1 Mr - .,. :K-, : ' ...,10 ' \II' ": ilillird — m ! iii° -ow.° ;'•13‘ r ''%, ' / lifito:,...iiiito - ' Vti° g; L ,,,e..., °'*.gi° ' ... ,„.,,°;-;,:---';''',.:°4-' --- CNi / '' '''' ''''' ' -:". * ' e'-:' ":- ' „„,........,:-... , :4,:i.t.t• , , et k '''''' q II ,,,...,r: •,,,,I.:' ''',, -.74 ', '.* ....."°' - 47 ' - :::* i - _I .4. f,,,.-'L-11 7 - ill tr°77--it k.- r. ., 1,....71 . -r%v,i'' 1 I ..-!'i - --- - ; . "" - "j:; .`-: --' i: 1 -- ;:.---- 7 . - '1:- - ..?- :-.4,,,,,...".„;-•::: 1 ; 4 c...,...,..., ,...... .- I- & E ... ,P-. :-: -. - : -....°. ..,,.., .„....4,.........4 .. ,____t...,..d.. ..E .— -2 , -7:,::"' f s ,,, - .. ..,.- '' . *.L. , " -. _;:.• ", ' St „` ..,, ,,,:',k' ::"' ij al Table A3 No Action Alternat /mss �%' v ". -' / g '& H v� 5 sk / "G " °` J ,f s g. / r � § r* -� °� 9 s ii l t e �� r .'fig 6 gg �, r r .# 4�fC : JH f T as a ?ruc'.7 / r EAR` r W.ig / - # - i� i� _ / '4,�em tC lsl `.!* ue ro / rj / / /// o F .1A- elocate F ` ! t t € / 7 � �✓ /l Sri s , - 'r i % -� Minneapolis -St. Paul International Airport 2020 Improvements EA No Action Alternati Integrated Noise Model (INM) Inputs The DNL contours were generated using version 7.0b of the FAA's Integrated Noise Model (INM). INM uses annual average daily operations to compute existing and forecast noise. Annual average daily operations are representative of all aircraft operations that occur over the course of a year. The total annual operations are divided by 365 days to determine the annual average daily operations. Runway and flight track use is also averaged over one year. The use of INM and computer -based noise modeling allow for the projection of future, forecast noise exposure. When the calculations are made in a consistent manner, INM is most accurate for comparing "before- and - after" noise effects resulting from forecast changes or potential alternatives. INM allows noise predictions for such forecast change actions without the actual implementation and noise monitoring of those actions. Atmospheric data from the National Weather Service (NWS) and the Minnesota State Climatologist's Office was gathered for the development of the 2010 existing noise contours. The NWS 2010 annual average temperature of 49.9 degrees Fahrenheit and 2010 average annual wind speed of 8.2 Knots was used in the INM modeling process. The 2010 average annual pressure of 29.98 inches and a 2010 annual average relative humidity of 63.9 percent, as reported by the Minnesota State Climatologist's Office were also used. The atmospheric data for the 2020 and 2025 forecast noise contours were derived from the annual average values from the past 30 years' historical weather data available from the Minnesota State Climatologist's Office. An annual average temperature of 45.2 degrees Fahrenheit and an average annual wind speed of 9.2 Kts. were used in the INM modeling process. An average annual pressure of 29.11 inches and an annual average relative humidity of 68.0 percent were also used. High temperatures decrease air density, which decreases aircraft performance (e.g., takeoff distance increases and climb rate decreases) and generally results in increased noise. In conjunction with temperature, humidity affects the propagation of noise through the air. In general, sound travels farther in more humid conditions. Relative humidity is highest at night and gradually drops during the day, with the lowest point generally occurring in the afternoon. Terrain data at 100 -foot intervals were used in the noise model. Existing and Forecast Fleet Mix and Total Operations Table A4 provides the total number of operations at MSP in 2010 (Existing Conditions) as well as the forecasted operations, detailed by operations category, for 2020 and 2025. The forecast operation levels are the same for the No Action, Airlines Remain and Airlines Relocate Alternative (Sponsor's Preferred Alternative) in 2020 and 2025, respectively. This is due to the belief that the level of future demand at MSP will remain constant among the various options. However, the level of service provided to the traveling public, and /4Z efficiency with which aircraft and passengers are accommodated by the airport, are the primary variables affected by the respective alternatives. Table A4 2010, 2020 and 2025 Operations Numbers Operations Category 2010 2020 2025 Scheduled Passenger Air Carrier 394,407 439,940 480,960 Cargo 12,049 12,764 12,826 Charter 103 96 106 GA 26,185 29,934 30,003 Military 2,839 2,145 2,145 Total 435,583 484,879 526,040 Sources: (1) Based on actual year -to -date 2010 MACNOMS data adjusted to match FAA ATADS data (to account for unavailable MACNOMS operations data). (2) Table 10.2 in Aviation Activity Forecast Technical Report, HNTB Corporation 8/5/2011. Table A5 provides a breakdown of the 2010 aircraft fleet mix at MSP. In 2010, the average daily number of total nighttime operations was 93.4. Overall, the 2010 total average daily operations number was 1,190.9. Table A5 2010 Aircraft Fleet Mix Average Daily Operations Group Aircraft Type Day Night Total Manufactured/ Re- engined A300 -622R 0.1 0.1 0.1 Stage 3 Jet A300B4 -203 0.0 0.0 0.0 A310 -304 0.0 0.0 0.0 A318 0.0 0.0 0.0 A319 -131 92.2 6.5 98.7 A320 -211 92.8 11.7 104.5 A321 -232 2.1 0.9 3.0 A330 5.2 0.5 5.6 A340 0.0 0.0 0.0 ASTR 0.0 0.0 0.0 B717-200 8.4 1.5 9.9 B737-300 12.5 0.9 13.4 B737 -400 0.4 0.1 0.5 B737-500 1.8 0.7 2.5 B737 -700 22.6 4.7 27.3 B737-800 36.3 10.3 46.7 B737-900 0.0 0.0 0.0 B747-100 0.0 0.0 0.0 B747 -200 0.1 0.1 0.1 B747-400 1.7 0.0 1.7 B757-200 39.6 6.5 46.2 B757-300 26.8 1.8 28.6 '04( Table A5 2010 Aircraft Fleet Mix Average Daily Operations Group Aircraft Type Day Night Total B767-200 1.5 0.1 1.6 Manufactured/ Re- engined B767-300 2.2 0.1 2.3 Stage 3 Jet B767 -400 0.8 0.6 1.4 B777 -200 0.0 0.0 0.0 B777-300 0.0 0.0 0.0 BA46 0.0 0.0 0.0 BEC400 1.5 0.1 1.6 C500 0.0 0.0 0.0 C650 0.0 0.0 0.0 C750 0.0 0.0 0.0 CARJ /C L601 333.8 16.2 350.1 CL600 1.2 0.1 1.3 CNA500 0.1 0.0 0.1 CNA501 0.1 0.0 0.1 CNA525 1.0 0.0 1.0 CNA550 0.7 0.0 0.7 CNA551 0.0 0.0 0.0 CNA560 5.4 0.3 5.7 CNA650 2.6 0.2 2.8 CNA750 5.6 0.5 6.1 DC10 2.9 1.5 4.4 DC820 0.0 0.0 0.0 DC860 0.0 0.0 0.0 DC87 0.5 1.5 2.0 E145 0.0 0.0 0.0 EMB135 2.9 0.1 2.9 EMB145 30.6 2.7 33.3 EMB170 119.4 6.1 125.5 EMB190 1.9 0.1 2.0 GLF4 0.0 0.0 0.0 GLF5 1.1 0.1 1.2 GLFIV 1.4 0.1 1.5 HS125 4.0 0.4 4.3 IA1124 0.1 0.0 0.1 IA1125 0.5 0.1 0.5 L101 0.0 0.0 0.0 LEAR31 0.3 0.0 0.3 LEAR35 2.2 0.3 2.5 LEAR45 1.9 0.1 2.0 LEAR55 0.2 0.0 0.2 LEAR60 0.7 0.0 0.8 MD11GE 2.0 1.6 3.6 /OS- Table A5 2010 Aircraft Fleet Mix Average Daily Operations Group Aircraft Type Day Night Total MD81 31.0 2.0 33.0 Manufactured/ Re- engined MD83 0.0 0.0 0.0 Stage 3 Jet MD9025 32.3 2.5 34.8 MU300 0.0 0.0 0.0 SABR65 0.0 0.0 0.1 SBR2 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total 935.0 83.7 1018.6 Hushkit Stage 3 Jet 727Q 0.7 0.7 1.5 737Q 0.1 0.0 0.1 BAC111 0.0 0.0 0.0 DC9Q 61.6 1.3 63.0 Total 62.4 2.0 64.6 Microjet CNA510 0.1 0.0 0.1 Total 0.1 0.0 0.1 Stage 2 Less than 75,000 Ib. FAL10 0.1 0.0 0.1 Maximum Take -Off Weight FAL200 0.6 0.7 1.3 (MTOW) FAL20A 0.7 0.0 0.7 GIl 1.4 0.1 1.5 GIII 0.2 0.0 0.2 LEAR24 0.0 0.0 0.0 LEAR25 0.0 0.0 0.1 SABR75 0 0 Total 3.0 0.8 3.9 Propeller A748 0.0 0.0 0.0 BEC100 0.0 0.0 0.1 BEC190 3.8 0.2 4.1 BEC200 1.5 0.2 1.7 BEC23 0.0 0.0 0.0 BEC24 0.0 0.0 0.0 BEC300 0.4 0.0 0.5 BEC3OB 0.2 0.0 0.2 BEC33 0.1 0.0 0.1 BEC55 0.0 0.0 0.0 BEC58 0.2 0.0 0.2 BEC60 0.0 0.0 0.0 BEC65 7.2 1.5 8.7 BEC80 2.2 0.3 2.4 BEC90 0.6 0.2 0.8 BEC95 0.0 0.0 0.0 BEC99 5.0 0.9 5.9 BL26 0.0 0.0 0.0 CNA150 0.0 0.0 0.0 / Table A5 2010 Aircraft Fleet Mix Average Daily Operations Group Aircraft Type Day Night Total CNA170 0.0 0.0 0.0 Propeller CNA172 0.1 0.0 0.1 CNA177 0.0 0.0 0.0 CNA180 0.0 0.0 0.0 CNA182 0.0 0.0 0.0 CNA185 0.0 0.0 0.0 CNA205 0.0 0.0 0.0 CNA206 0.1 0.0 0.1 CNA208 0.6 0.1 0.7 CNA210 0.1 0.0 0.1 CNA303 0.0 0.0 0.0 CNA310 0.1 0.0 0.1 CNA320 0.0 0.0 0.0 CNA337 0.0 0.0 0.0 CNA340 0.1 0.0 0.1 CNA401 0.0 0.0 0.0 CNA402 0.1 0.0 0.1 CNA404 0.0 0.0 0.0 CNA414 0.3 0.0 0.3 CNA421 0.2 0.0 0.2 CNA425 0.0 0.0 0.0 CNA441 0.2 0.0 0.2 DHC6 0.0 0.0 0.0 DHC8 0.0 0.0 0.0 D0328 0.1 0.0 0.1 EMB110 0.0 0.0 0.0 FK27 0.0 0.0 0.0 GASEPF 0.3 0.0 0.3 GASEPV 0.2 0.0 0.3 GULF1 0.2 0.0 0.2 LA42 0.0 0.0 0.0 M20J 0.3 0.0 0.4 MU2 0.0 0.0 0.0 PA23AZ 0.0 0.0 0.0 PA24 0.0 0.0 0.0 PA28 0.1 0.0 0.1 PA30 0.0 0.0 0.0 PA31 0.6 0.1 0.6 PA32 0.2 0.0 0.2 PA34 0.2 0.0 0.3 PA42 0.0 0.0 0.0 PA44 0.0 0.0 0.0 lo7 Table A5 2010 Aircraft Fleet Mix Average Daily Operations Group Aircraft Type Day Night Total PA46 0.1 0.0 0.1 Propeller PA60 0.0 0.0 0.1 RWCM69 0.0 0.0 0.0 SAMER2 0.0 0.0 0.0 SAMER3 0.1 0.0 0.1 SAMER4 1.5 0.0 1.6 SD330 0.0 0.0 0.0 SF340 65.9 3.2 69.1 Total 92.9 6.7 100.2 Helicopter A109 0.0 0.0 0.0 B206L 0.0 0.0 0.0 B212 0.0 0.0 0.0 B222 0.0 0.0 0.0 EC130 0.0 0.0 0.0 S70 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total 0.0 0.0 0.0 Military Jet C130 3.1 0.2 3.4 C17 0.0 0.0 0.0 C5 0.0 0.0 0.0 C9A 0.0 0.0 0.0 F -18 0.0 0.0 0.0 F16GE 0.0 0.0 0.0 F5E 0.0 0.0 0.0 KC135 0.0 0.0 0.0 T -38A 0.1 0.0 0.1 T1 0.0 0.0 0.0 T34 0.0 0.0 0.0 T37 0.0 0.0 0.0 T38 0.0 0.0 0.0 U21 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total 3.2 0.2 3.5 Total 1096.6 93.4 1190.9 Note: - Totals may differ from sum due to rounding. Source: MAC, 2011. Similar to the total forecast operation numbers, the fleet mix for the respective alternatives shows minimal variation in the respective forecast years. Again, this is a function of future operations trends that are forecasted to transpire regardless of the development alternative selected at MSP. Specifically, it is anticipated that airlines will favor an up- gauging in the size of aircraft at the Airport, regardless of the development option that is selected. The 2020 forecast operation level of 484,879 represents an increase of 49,296 operations (11.3 %) from 2010 (Existing Conditions). Although 2020 forecasted operations are anticipated to be 10.4% lower than the peak in 2004, total passengers are expected to increase from the 2004 level of 36.7 million to 41.8 million in 2020. This is a direct result of higher Toad factors with larger aircraft. For the future years analysis, as previously stated, the fleet mix and operational level is the same for each alternative (No Action, Airlines Remain Alternative and Airlines Relocate Alternative). However, the split between daytime and nighttime operations vary slightly between alternatives. As an example, the average daily nighttime operations forecasted in 2020 increases from the 2010 Existing Condition of 93.4 to 104.3 under the Airlines Remain Alternative and to a level of 104.4 with the Airlines Relocate Alternative (the Sponsor's Preferred Alternative). Tables A6 - A8 detail the 2020 and 2025 aircraft fleet mix and a day -night operations breakdown for each alternative. The fleet mix was developed from the gated flight schedule that was produced from the aviation activity forecasts. For the noise analysis, the simulation results were used to define the time of day for aircraft operations (i.e., daytime and nighttime periods of DNL) based upon the effect of delay as estimated by the SIMMOD analysis. The gated flight schedule provided information on stage lengths. The forecast fleet mix details the full phase -out of hushkitted Stage 3 aircraft over 75,000 pounds at MSP. Table A6 2020 and 2025 No Action Alternative Forecast Aircraft Fleet Mix Average Daily Operations 2020 2025 Group Aircraft Type Day Night Total Day Night Total Manufactured /Re- engined A300B4 -203 2.8 : 2.4 ' 5.2 2.7 2.4 5.2 Stage 3 Jet A319 -131 113.8 5.9 119.7 125.5 4.7 : 130.2 A320 -211 88.1 9.7, 97.8 95.4 13.0 108.4 A321 -232 4.3 0.9 5.2 48.7 5.5 54.2 A330 2.1 0.8 . 2.9 3.8 0.8 4.6 B717-200 10.2 2.0 12.1 8.6 0.0 8.6 B737 -400 0.1 1.6 1.7 0.1 1.6 ! 1.7 B737-700 63.1 7.6 + 70.7 89.4: 10.0 99.4 B737 -800 116.3 18.7 135.0 205.7 26.3 232.0 B747-400 4.2 0.0 4.2 1.4 0.0 1.4 B757-200 35.9: 8.4 ' 44.4 4.0 2.8 6.9 B757 -300 26.3 0.9 27.2 27.1 1.8 29.0 B767-200 1.7 ! 0.0 1.7 1.7 0.0 1.7 B767 -300 0.1 1.6 1.7 B767 -400 4.0 0.8 4.8 7.1 0.8 7.9 B777-200 2.4 0.8 3.2 5.7 ! 0.8 6.5 lay( Table A6 2020 and 2025 No Action Alternative Forecast Aircraft Fleet Mix Average Daily Operations 2020 2025 Group Aircraft Type Day Night Total Day Night ! Total B787 -800 4.3 0.0 4.3 5.7 0.0 5.7 BEC400 2.6 0.8 l 3.4 2.6 . 0.8 3.4 CARJ /CL601 278.0 12.5 ' 290.5 280.8 12.1 292.9 CL600 2.5 0.9 3.4 2.5 0.9 3.4 CNA501 1.7 0.0 1.7 1.7 0.0 1.7 Manufactured /Re- engined CNA525 4.4 0.8 '. 5.2 4.4 0.8 5.1 Stage 3 Jet CNA550 1.7 0.0 1.7 1.7 0.0 1.7 CNA560 8.5 0.0 ? 8.5 8.5 0.0 8.5 CNA650 1.7 0.0 '` 1.7 3.4 0.0 3.4 CNA750 6.9 0.0 6.9 6.9 ! 0.0 6.9 DC10 1.8 1.6 ' 3.5 1.8 1.6 3.4 EMB145 20.5 1.9 22.4 18.6 2.0 20.6 EMB170 151.2 3.6 154.9 145.5 5.6 151.1 GLF5 1.7 0.0 1.7 1.7 0.0 1.7 HS125 5.1 0.0 ' 5.1 5.1 0.0 5.1 IA1125 1.7 ' 0.0 1.7 1.7 0.0 1.7 LEAR35 5.1 0.0 5.1 5.1 0.0 5.1 LEAR45 3.5 0.0 ` 3.5 3.5 0.0 3.5 LEAR60 1.7 0.0 1 1.7 1.7 0.0 1.7 MD11GE 2.7 2.5 5.2 2.4 2.8 5.2 MD81 55.8 2.7 58.6 17.6 ! 2.9 20.5 MD9025 88.4 5.7 94.0 89.2 1.1 90.4 Total 1126.9 93.7 1220.6 1239.3 ! 102.9 1342.1 Stage 2 Less than 75,000 FAL200 2.5 0.8 3.3 2.5 ! 0.8 3.3 lb. MTOW FAL20A 1.7 0.0 1.7 1.7 0.0 1.7 Gil 0.9 0.9 1.7 0.9 ! 0.9 1.7 Total 5.1 1.6 6.7 5.1 1.6 6.7 Propeller ATR42 0.9 0.9 1.7 0.9 0.9 1.7 BEC190 1.7 0.0E 1.7 1.7 0.0 1.7 BEC200 1.7 0.0 ', 1.7 1.7 0.0 1.7 BEC55 0.9!: 0.9i 1.7 0.9! 0.9 1.7 BEC58 1.7 0.0 ` 1.7 1.7 0.0 1.7 BEC65 10.9 1.0 ', 11.9 10.8 1.1 11.9 BEC80 3.4 ! 0.0 3.4 3.4 ! 0.0 3.4 BEC90 16.2: 1.0 17.2 17.7 1.2 18.9 BEC99 6.0 0.9 6.9 6.0 0.9 6.9 /10 Table A6 2020 and 2025 No Action Alternative Forecast Aircraft Fleet Mix Average Daily Operations 2020 2025 Group Aircraft Type Day Night ' Total Day Night ! Total CNA208 1.0 0.8 ''! 1.8 1.0 0.8 1.8 GASEPV 1.7 0.0 1.7 1.7 0.0 1.7 M20J 1.7 0.0 '. 1.7 1.7 0.0 1.7 PA31 2.7 0.9 3.5 2.7 ! 0.9 3.5 PA34 0.9 0.9 1.7 0.9 0.8 1.7 SAMER4 1.7 0.0 ' 1.7 1.7 0.0 1.7 Propeller SF340 34.0 0.0 34.0 23.7 0.0 23.7 Total 87.1 7.1 94.2 78.1 7.4 85.5 Military Jet C130 3.4 ! 1.6 5.0 3.4 1.6 5.0 T -38A 1.7 0.0 1.7 1.7 0.0 1.7 Total 5.2 1.6 6.7 5.1 1.6 ! 6.7 Total Operations 1224.3 104.1 1328.3 1327.6 ! 113.5 1441.1 Notes: - Totals may differ from sum due to rounding. Source: MAC, 2011. Table A7 2020 and 2025 Alternative 1 - Airlines Remain Forecast Aircraft Fleet Mix Average Daily Operations 2020 2025 Group Aircraft Type Day Night Total Day Night Total Manufactured /Re- engined A300B4 -203 2.7 2.4 5.2 2.8 2.4 5.2 Stage 3 Jet A319 -131 113.8 6.0 119.7 125.5 4.7 130.2 A320 -211 88.0 9.8 97.8 95.4 13.0 108.4 A321 -232 4.3 0.9 5.2 48.8 5.5 54.2 A330 2.1 0.8 2.9 3.8 0.8 4.6 B717-200 10.2 2.0 12.1 8.6 0.0 8.6 B737-400 0.1 1.6 1.7 0.1 1.6 1.7 B737 -700 63.4 7.3 70.7 89.4: 9.9 99.4 B737 -800 116.2 18.7 ' 135.0 205.7 26.3 232.0 B747 -400 4.2 0.0 4.2 1.4 0.0 1.4 B757 -200 35.9 8.51 44.4 4.0 2.8 6.9 8757 -300 26.3 0.9 27.2 27.2: 1.8 29.0 B767 -200 1.7 0.0 1.7 1.7 0.0 1.7 B767 -300 0.1 1.6 1.7 B767 -400 4.0 0.8 4.8 7.1 0.8 7.9 1/1 Table A7 2020 and 2025 Alternative 1 - Airlines Remain Forecast Aircraft Fleet Mix Average Da ily Operations 2020 2025 Group Aircraft Type Day Night Total Day Night Total B777-200 2.4 0.8 3.2 5.7 0.8 6.5 B787-800 4.3 0.0 4.3 5.7 0.0 5.7 BEC400 2.6 0.8 3.4 2.6 ` 0.8 3.4 CARJ /CL601 277.9 12.6 ' 290.5 280.8 ! 12.1 292.9 CL600 2.5 0.9 3.4 2.5 0.9 3.4 Manufactured /Re- engined CNA501 1.7 0.0 1.7 1.7 ! 0.0 1.7 Stage 3 Jet CNA525 4.4 0.8 5.2 4.4 0.8 5.1 CNA550 1.7 0.0 1.7 1.7 ! 0.0 1.7 CNA560 8.5 0.0 8.5 8.5 0.0 8.5 CNA650 1.7 0.0 1.7 3.4 0.0 3.4 CNA750 6.9 0.0 6.9 6.9 0.0 6.9 DC10 1.8 1.6 3.5 1.8 1.6 3.4 EMB145 20.5 1.9 22.4 18.6 2.0 20.6 EMB170 151.2 3.6 154.9 145.5 5.6 151.1 GLF5 1.7 0.0 1.7 1.7 0.0 1.7 HS125 5.1 0.0 5.1 5.1 0.0 5.1 IA1125 1.7 0.0 1.7 1.7 0.0' 1.7 LEAR35 5.1 0.0 5.1 5.1 0.0 5.1 LEAR45 3.5 0.0 3.5 3.5 0.0 3.5 LEAR60 1.7 ' 0.0 1.7 1.7 0.0 1.7 MD11GE 2.5 2.6 5.2 2.4 ` 2.8 5.2 MD81 55.8 2.8 58.6 17.6 2.9 20.5 MD9025 88.4 5.6 94.0 89.2 1.1 90.4 Total 1126.8 93.8 1220.6 1239.5 102.6 1342.2 Stage 2 Less than 75,000 FAL200 2.4 ! 0.9 3.3 2.5 0.8 3.3 lb. MTOW FAL20A 1.7 0.0 1.7 1.7 0.0 ! 1.7 Gil 0.9 0.9 1.7 0.9 0.9 1.7 Total 4.9 1.8 6.7 5.1 1.6 6.7 Propeller ATR42 0.9 0.9 1.7 0.9 0.9 1.7 BEC190 1.7 0.0 1.7 1.7 0.0 1.7 BEC200 1.7 ! 0.0 ' 1.7 1.7 0.0 1.7 BEC55 0.9 0.9 1.7 0.9 0.9 1.7 BEC58 1.7 0.0 1.7 1.7 0.0 1.7 BEC65 10.9 1.0 ' 11.9 10.8 1.1 11.9 BEC80 3.4- 0.0= 3.4 3.4 0.0 3.4 BEC90 16.2 1.0 ': 17.2 17.7: 1.2 18.9 BEC99 6.0 0.9 6.9 6.0 ! 0.9 6.9 1D) Table A7 2020 and 2025 Alternative 1 - Airlines Remain Forecast Aircraft Fleet Mix Average Daily Operations 2020 2025 Group Aircraft Type Day Night Total Day Night Total CNA208 1.0! 0.8 1.8 1.0! 0.8 1.8 GASEPV 1.7 0.0° 1.7 1.7 0.0 1.7 M20J 1.7 0.0 1.7 1.7 0.0 1.7 PA31 2.7 0.9 3.5 2.7 0.9 3.5 PA34 0.9 0.9 1.7 0.9 0.8 1.7 SAMER4 1.7 ! 0.0 ' 1.7 1.7 0.0 1.7 Propeller SF340 34.0 0.0 ' 34.0 23.7 0.0 23.7 Total 87.1 7.1 94.2 78.2 7.4 85.5 Military Jet C130 3.4 1.6 5.0 3.4 1.6 5.0 T -38A 1.7 0.0 1.7 1.7 0.0 1.7 Total 5.2 1.6 6.7 5.1 1.6 ! 6.7 Total Operations 1224.0 104.3 1328.3 1327.9 113.2 1441.1 Notes: - Totals may differ from sum due to rounding. Source: MAC, 2011. Table A8 2020 and 2025 Alternative 2 - Airlines Relocate Forecast Aircraft Fleet Mix Average Daily Operations 2020 2025 Group Aircraft Type Day Night Total Day Night ` Total Manufactured /Re- engined A300B4 -203 2.7 2.5 5.2 2.7 2.4 - 5.2 Stage 3 Jet A319 -131 113.8 5.9 119.7 125.5 4.7 130.2 A320 -211 88.0 9.8 97.8 95.3 13.1 108.4 A321 -232 4.3 ! 0.9 5.2 48.7 5.6 54.2 A330 2.1 0.8 ! 2.9 3.8 _ 0.8 4.6 B717-200 10.2 2.0 12.1 8.6 0.0 8.6 B737-400 0.1 1.6 1.7 0.1 1.6 1.7 B737 -700 63.5 7.3 70.7 89.3 ! 10.1: 99.4 B737 -800 116.3 18.7 135.0 205.4 26.6 232.0 B747 -400 4.2 0.0 4.2 1.4 0.0 ' 1.4 B757 -200 35.9 8.4 44.4 4.0 2.8 6.9 B757 -300 26.3 0.9 27.2 27.1 ! 1.9 29.0 B767 -200 1.7 0.0 1.7 1.7 0.0 1 1.7 B767-300 0.1 1.6 ' 1.7 B767-400 4.0 0.8 4.8 7.1 0.8 7.9 0 Table A8 2020 and 2025 Alternative 2 - Airlines Relocate Forecast Aircraft Fleet Mix Average Da ily Operations 2020 2025 Group Aircraft Type Day Night Total Day Night Total B777-200 2.4 0.8 3.2 5.7 0.8 6.5 B787-800 4.3 ! 0.0 4.3 5.7 0.0 5.7 BEC400 2.6'' 0.8! 3.4 2.6 0.8! 3.4 CARJ /CL601 277.9 12.6 290.5 280.7 12.1 292.9 CL600 2.5 0.9 3.4 2.5 0.9 3.4 CNA501 1.7 0.0 1.7 1.7 0.0 1.7 Manufactured /Re- engined CNA525 4.4 0.8 5.2 4.3 0.8 5.1 Stage 3 Jet CNA550 1.7 0.0 1.7 1.7 0.0 1.7 CNA560 8.5 ! 0.0 8.5 8.5 0.0 8.5 CNA650 1.7 0.0 1.7 3.4 0.0 3.4 CNA750 6.9 0.0 6.9 6.9 0.0 6.9 DC10 1.8 1.6! 3.5 1.8 1.6- 3.4 EMB145 20.5 1.9 22.4 18.6 2.0 20.6 EMB 170 151.3 3.6 154.9 145.5 5.6 151.1 GLF5 1.7 0.0 1.7 1.7 0.0 '. 1.7 HS125 5.1 0.0 ! 5.1 5.1 0.0 5.1 IA1125 1.7 0.0 1.7 1.7 0.0 1.7 LEAR35 5.1 0.0 5.1 5.1 0.0 5.1 LEAR45 3'.5 0.0 3.5 3.5 0.0 3.5 LEAR60 1.7 0.0 1.7 1.7 0.0 1.7 MD11GE 2.4 2.8 5.2 2.5 2.6 5.2 MD81 55.8 2.7 58.6 17.6 2.9 20.5 MD9025 88.4 5.6 94.0 89.2 1.1 90.4 Total 1126.8 93.9 1220.6 1238.7 103.4 ; 1342.2 Stage 2 Less than 75,000 FAL200 2.4 0.9 3.3 2.5 0.8 3.3 lb. MTOW FAL20A 1.7 0.0 1.7 1.7 0.0 ' 1.7 GII 0.9 ` 0.9 1.7 0.9 0.9 1.7 Total 4.9 1.8 6.7 5.0 1.6 ' 6.7 Propeller ATR42 0.9 ! 0.9 1.7 0.9 0.9 ' 1.7 BEC190 1.7', 0.0 ! 1.7 1.7 0.0 1.7 BEC200 1.7 0.0 1.7 1.7 0.0 ! 1.7 BEC55 0.9 0.9 1.7 0.9 0.9 1.7 BEC58 1.7 0.0 1.7 1.7 0.0 1.7 BEC65 10.9 1.0 11.9 10.8: 1.1E 11.9 BEC80 3.4 0.0 3.4 3.4 0.0 3.4 BEC90 16.2 1.0 ! 17.2 17.7 1.2 18.9 BEC99 6.0 0.9 6.9 6.0 0.9 6.9 1L Table A8 2020 and 2025 Alternative 2 - Airlines Relocate Forecast Aircraft Fleet Mix Average Daily Operations 2020 2025 Group Aircraft Type Day Night Total Day Night ' Total CNA208 1.0 0.8 1.8 1.0 0.8 1.8 GASEPV 1.7 0.0 1.7 1.7 0.0 , 1.7 M20J 1.7 0.0 1.7 1.7 0.0 1.7 PA31 2.7 0.9 3.5 2.7 0.9 ; 3.5 PA34 0.9 0.9 1.7 0.9 0.8 ■ 1.7 SAMER4 1.7 0.0 ! 1.7 1.7 0.0 1.7 Propeller SF340 34.0 0.0 34.0 23.7 0.0 23.7 Total 87.1 7.1 94.2 78.2 7.4 85.5 Military Jet C130 3.4 1.6 5.0 3.4 1.6 5.0 T -38A 1.7 0.0 1.7 1.7 0.0 '+ 1.7 Total 5.1 1.6 6.7 5.1 1.6 6.7 Total Operations 1223.9 104.4 1328.3 1327.1 114.0 1441.1 Notes: - Totals may differ from sum due to rounding. Source: MAC, 2011. Run -up operations were projected to increase from the 2010 Base Case levels in a manner that considers overall operations growth and fleet mix out to 2020 and 2025. The aircraft stage length data were provided by the forecast analysis conducted for the EA. Aircraft types not contained in the INM were modeled with the INM's list of approved substitutions or with aircraft identified as appropriate substitutions through coordination with the FAA. INM Analysis 2010 (Existing) Runway Use FAA control of runway use throughout the year for arrival and departure operations at MSP has a notable effect on the noise impact around the airport. The number of people and dwellings impacted by noise is a direct result of the number of operations on a given runway and the land uses off the end of the runway. Historically, prior to the opening of Runway 17/35, arrival and departure operations occurred on the parallel runways at MSP (12L/30R and 12R/30L) in a manner that resulted in approximately 50 percent of the arrival and departure operations occurring to the northwest over South Minneapolis and 50 percent to the southeast over Mendota Heights and Eagan. As a result of the dense residential land uses to the northwest and the predominantly industrial /commercial land uses to the southeast of MSP, focusing arrival and departure operations to the southeast has long been the preferred configuration from a noise reduction perspective. Since the introduction of Runway 17/35 at MSP in 2005, another opportunity exists to route aircraft over an unpopulated area - the Minnesota River Valley. With use of the Runway 17 Departure Procedure, westbound departure operations off Runway 17 are routed such that they avoid close -in residential areas southwest of the runway. Thus, use of Runway 17 for departure operations is the second preferred operational configuration (after Runways 12L and 12R) for noise reduction purposes. Table A9 provides the runway use percentages for 2010. Table A9 2010 Runway Use Percentages Operation Type Runway Day Night Total Arrivals 4 0.0% 0.1% 0.0% 12L 19.9% 14.0% 19.4% 12R 19.1% 24.8% 19.6% 17 0.1% 0.0% 0.1% 22 0.3% 0.9% 0.4% 30L 17.9% 36.4% 19.4% 30R 22.2% 22.1% 22.2% 35 20.6% 1.8% 19.0% Total 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% Departures 4 0.1% 0.1% 0.1% 12L 12.6% 17.4% 12.9% 12R 6.5% 25.4% 8.0% 17 21.8% 14.2% 21.2% 22 0.4% 0.6% 0.4% 30L 26.2% 22.4% 25.9% 30R 32.5% 19.9% 31.6% 35 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Total 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% Overall 4 0.0% 0.1% 0.0% 12L 16.2% 15.6% 16.2% 12R 12.8% 25.1% 13.8% 17 10.9% 6.8% 10.6% 22 0.3% 0.7% 0.4% 30L 22.0% 29.7% 22.6% 30R 27.3% 21.1% 26.8% 35 10.3% 0.9% 9.6% Total 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% Note: - Total may not add up to 100% due to rounding. Source: MACNOMS data was used to calculate runway use for 2010. H49 INM Analysis Forecast Runway Use Tables A10, Al 1 and Al2 provide the 2020 and 2025 No Action, Airlines Remain Alternative and the Airlines Relocate Alternative runway use percentages. The SIMMOD use assumptions that resulted in the runways' use percentages included the consideration of the Runway Use System (RUS) at MSP, as well as the FAA's runway selection patterns related to various operational flows, weather conditions, and aircraft destination and origin locations. Table Al0 2020 and 2025 No Action Alternative Forecast Runway Use 2020 2025 Operation Type Runway Day Night Total Day Night Total Arrivals 4 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 12L 19.3% 10.9% 18.6% 19.0% 12.1% 18.5% 12R 19.6% 28.2% 20.3% 19.8% 26.7% 20.4% 17 0.1% 0.0% 0.1% 0.1% 0.0% 0.1% 22 0.4% 0.4% 0.4% 0.4% 0.4% 0.4% 30L 18.7% ` 39.1% 20.4% 19.1% 38.2% 20.6% 30R 21.1% 21.3% 21.1% 21.0% 22.6% 21.1% 35 20.9% 0.0% 19.2% 20.6% 0.0% 19.0% Total 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% Departures 4 0.1% 0.1% 0.1% 0.1% 0.1% 0.1% 12L 12.8% 16.9% 13.1% 13.0% 19.8% 13.6% 12R 7.5% 26.6% 9.0% 6.8% 23.1% 8.1% 17 21.3% 14.4% 20.7% 21.9% 14.3% ! 21.3% 22 0.5% 0.5% 0.5% 0.5% 0.4% 0.4% 30L 26.2% 21.9% 25.9% 26.8% 22.8% 26.5% 30R 31.6% 19.6% 30.7% 30.9% 19.5% 30.0% 35 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Total 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% Overall 4 0.1% 0.1% 0.1% 0.1% 0.1% 0.1% 12L 16.0% 13.9% 15.9% 16.1% 16.0% 16.0% 12R 13.5% 27.4% 14.6% 13.3% 24.9% 14.2% 17 10.7% 7.1% 10.4% 11.0% 7.2% 10.7% 22 0.4% 0.4% 0.4% 0.4% 0.4% 0.4% 30L 22.5% ` 30.6% 23.1% 23.0% 30.4% 23.5% 30R 26.3% 20.5% 25.9% 25.9% 21.0% 25.5% 35 10.4% 0.0% 9.6% 10.3% 0.0% 9.5% Total 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% Note: - Total may not add up to 100% due to rounding. Source: MAC, 2011. 117 Table All 2020 and 2025 Alternative 1 - Airlines Remain Forecast Runway Use 2020 2025 Operation Type Runway Day Night Total Day Night Total Arrivals 4 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 12L 19.2% 10.9% 18.5% 19.1% 11.4% 18.5% 12R 19.7% 28.3% 20.4% 19.8% 27.8% 20.4% 17 0.1% 0.0% 0.1% 0.1% 0.0% 0.1% 22 0.4% 0.4% 0.4% 0.4% 0.4% 0.4% 30L 18.8% 39.3% 20.4% 19.4% 39.5% 21.0% 30R 21.1% 21.2% 21.1% 21.1% 20.9% 21.1% 35 20.7% 0.0% 19.1% 20.2% 0.0% 18.6% Total 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% Departures 4 0.1% 0.1% 0.1% 0.1% 0.1% 0.1% 12L 12.8% 15.8% 13.1% 13.1% 19.8% 13.6% 12R 7.5% 27.4% 9.0% 6.8% 24.3% 8.2% 17 21.3% 14.4% 20.7% 21.9% 13.9% 21.2% 22 0.5% 0.5% 0.5% 0.5% 0.4% 0.4% 30L 26.3% 21.2% 25.9% 26.9% 22.0% 26.5% 30R 31.5% 20.6% 30.7% 30.8% 19.5% 29.9% 35 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Total 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% Overall 4 0.1% 0.1% 0.1% 0.1% 0.1% 0.1% 12L 16.0% 13.3% 15.8% 16.1% 15.7% 16.0% 12R 13.6% 27.8% 14.7% 13.3% 26.0% 14.3% 17 10.7% 7.1% 10.4% 11.0% 7.1% 10.7% 22 0.4% 0.4% 0.4% 0.4% 0.4% 0.4% 30L 22.6% 30.3% 23.2% 23.1% 30.6% 23.7% 30R 26.3% 20.9% : 25.9% 26.0% 20.2% 25.5% 35 10.4% 0.0% 9.6% 10.1% 0.0% 9.3% Total 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% Notes: - Total may not add up to 100% due to rounding. Source: MAC, 2011. Table Al2 2020 and 2025 Alternative 2 - Airlines Relocate Forecast Runway Use 2020 2025 Operation Type Runway Day Night Total Day Night Total Arrival 4 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% ! 0.0% 12L 19.3% 9.0% 18.5% 19.2% 10.3% 18.5% 12R 19.5% 30.2% ': 20.4% 19.6% 28.9% 20.4% 17 0.1% 0.0% 0.1% 0.1% 0.0% 0.1% 22 0.4% 0.4% 0.4% 0.4% 0.4% 0.4% 30L 18.4% 41.1% 20.2% 18.8% 41.2% 20.6% 30R 21.3% 19.4% 21.2% 21.2% 19.2% 21.0% 35 21.0% 0.0% 19.3% 20.7% 0.0% 19.1% Total 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% ! 100.0% Departure 4 0.1% 0.1% 0.1% 0.1% 0.1 % 0.1% 12L 12.8% 14.9% 13.0% 13.1% 19.0% 13.5% 12R 7.6% 27.1% 9.1% 6.8% 23.7% 8.1% 17 21.2% 16.0% 20.8% 21.9% 14.8% 21.3% 22 0.5% 0.5% 0.5% 0.4% 0.4% 0.4% 30L 26.5% 23.1% 26.3% 26.6% 21.4% 26.2% 30R 31.3% 18.3% 30.3% 31.1% 20.6% 30.2% 35 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Total 100.0% ! 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% Overall 4 0.1% 0.1% 0.1% 0.1% 0.1% 0.1% 12L 16.1% 11.9% 15.7% 16.1% 14.7% 16.0% 12R 13.5% 28.6% 14.7% 13.2% 26.3% 14.3% 17 10.6% 7.9% 10.4% 11.0% 7.5% 10.7% 22 0.4% 0.4% 0.4% 0.4% 0.4% 0.4% 30L 22.5% 32.2% 23.2% 22.7% 31.2% 23.4% 30R 26.3% 18.9% 25.7% 26.1% 19.9% 25.6% 35 10.5% 0.0% 9.7% 10.4% 0.0% 9.5% Total 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% Notes: - Total may not add up to 100% due to rounding. Source: MAC, 2011. The RUS is a major factor in the nighttime runway use percentages. However, in the low demand time periods during the nighttime hours, the FAA will use the parallel runway that is closest to the airport arrival or departure gate of an aircraft. As a result, arrival percentages to the south parallel runway (Runway 12R/30L) during nighttime hours are notably higher than on the north parallel runway (Runway 12L/30R). This has an effect on the arrival noise contour lobes off the ends of the south parallel runway. 1/? INM Analysis Existing and Forecast Flight Tracks and Usage The flight tracks used and the use of individual tracks in 2010 (Existing Conditions) are detailed in the Annual Noise Contour Report online at: http: / /www.macnoise.com /contourreport. The 2010 Base Case INM tracks were used for the 2020 and 2025 INM forecast noise analysis for all of the alternatives. However, the forecast aircraft type track use distribution was developed using actual operations distributions on those tracks at MSP from September 2010 to September 2011. As a result of a near mid -air collision to the northwest of MSP in September 2010, the FAA renewed efforts to cross operations on the ground rather than in the air. This resulted in a higher concentration of northbound operations on the north parallel runway (Runway 12L/30R) and southbound operations on the south parallel runway (Runway 12R/30L). To ensure the forecast noise analysis captured the effect that this had on the track usage, the analysis uses the September 2010 to September 2011 flight track distribution percentages for the forecast noise analysis. gad