Loading...
04/10/2000 - Airport Relations Commission MINUTES OF THE EAGAN AIRPORT RELATIONS COMMISSION MEETING APRIL 10, 2000 A regular meeting of the Eagan Airport Relations Commission was held on Monday, April 10, 2000, at 7:00 p.m. Those present were Eric Drenckhahn, Ted Gladhill, Alice Kreitz, Steve Soderling, Lance Staricha, Charles Thorkildson, Nadim Zoberi and Hassan Saffouri, Alternate. Also present was Jamie Verbrugge, Assistant City Administrator and Mary Swenson, Recording Secretary. AGENDA Upon motion by Zoberi, seconded by Kreitz, the agenda was approved as presented. All members voted in favor. MINUTES Soderling made a motion to approve the minutes; Thorkildson seconded the motion. All members voted in favor. VISITORS TO BE HEARD There were no visitors to be heard. PART 150 UPDATE Verbrugge gave a brief overview and update of flight track information on the new North -South Runway which will be operational in 2003. He provided an overhead displaying a flight track map for the North -South Runway and stated there are seven projected flight tracks coming off this runway in which three of those flight tracks will be over the City and, further indicated areas of Eagan that will be affected by the new runway. Verbrugge stated that flight track information was discussed at the MASAC Operations Committee meeting on March 10 and March 24. Using the overhead flight track map, he illustrated different scenarios for departures and arrivals on the North -South and the parallel runways. Verbrugge stated that the 2005 projected number of operations on a daily basis for the Minneapolis -St. Paul International Airport is 788 arrivals and 788 departures. He also stated that 43 percent of all daytime departures coming off the new runway will be flying over the City of Eagan and, further, stated the fleet mix of those departures is roughly 62 percent passenger jets, 24 percent regional aircraft, 5 percent cargo and 9 percent general aviation and military. Verbrugge stated the primary concern for residents will be departures because of the number of people affected. Soderling asked if aircraft are supposed to be right on the flight tracks or in- between them. Verbrugge stated the FAA control tower can give anything in- between as needed to fan flights for separation. He also stated that in further discussion with FAA and MAC, there is the possibility of the 100 degree flight track not being eliminated, but to use the flight track for turbo props only; no commercial or cargo planes. Gladhill commented on JeffHamiel's letter and staated that they probably would not eliminate any flight tracks because it would then mean that aircraft would have to be re- routed to other communities. Verbrugge stated he felt that Mr. Hamiel was sensitive to our concerns, Airport Relations Commission Minutes April 10, 2000/2 but that he has not been privy to complete information. Gladhill further stated that he objects to Mr. Hamiel's response and does not want to soften our position. Verbrugge provided an overhead presentation from HNTB Consultants for the Part 150 Update that was presented at the MASAC Operations Committee meeting on the Runway Use System (RUS). He stated runway use is determined by multiple factors including weather, wind, capacity and flow. This presentation consisted of information on runway use alternatives for the North -South Runway, the existing runway use system, EIS night runway use, and RUS alternatives methodology. The Commission discussed the presentation by Verbrugge. Soderling commented he would like to see the parallel runways continue to handle traffic and use the North -South Runway as an overflow as operations continue to grow. Gladhill stated the wind factor will also favor the parallel runways. Staricha stated the North -South Runway will cut down air traffic for the City of Minneapolis. Gladhill further stated that phasing -in the North -South Runway would fit with the RUS. Verbrugge stated that the RUS is for night -time use, but further stated that this is a priority and the RUS should be used during daytime hours also. Verbrugge also stated that the number of people impacted by the alternatives is a greater number than by the existing RUS. Verbrugge told the Commission that he would continue to pursue the elimination of the 100 degree flight track heading and also pursue phased -in usage of air traffic on the North -South Runway. CITY OF BLOOMINGTON COMPREHENSIVE GUIDE PLAN UPDATE Verbrugge gave a brief overview of the City of Bloomington Comprehensive Guide Plan Update and further asked the Commission to identify any issues they would like forwarded to the City of Bloomington. Gladhill stated an area of contention was under Policy Object 1.4, encouraging prompt implementation of the North -South Runway, which will have a very positive affect on noise for the City of Bloomington, but does nothing for noise mitigation. Verbrugge stated he would provide comment on Policy Objective 1.4, stating that the City of Eagan does not see that objective as a reasonable measure for mitigating noise for cities around the airport. CITY OF MINNEAPOLIS RESOLUTION RE: MULTI- FAMILY SOUND INSULATION Verbrugge gave a brief overview of the City of Minneapolis Resolution which was passed in November of 1999. He stated the most important segment of the Resolution was no. 4 regarding the completion of sound insulation of multi - family residential structures within the 2005 65 and greater DNL noise contours. He stated the concern would be that multi - family homes within the 65 DNL would be insulated prior to insulating single family residential units between the 60 and 65 DNL. Verbrugge displayed contour maps showing concentrated areas of multi - family structures for the communities surrounding the airport. Verbrugge stated it would be his recommendation to have local control on how the sound insulation program funding is applied. He further stated in that respect, Minneapolis could use their annual allocation of sound insulation funding to do multi - family residential units and Eagan could continue to do single family residential structures. There was further discussion among Commission members as to how the allocation is computed. Soderling made a motion that the Airport Relations Commission recommend that individual communities may allocate the Metropolitan Airports Commission Part 150 Sound Insulation funds to insulate multi - family dwellings as long as the multi - family units are not counted when apportioning residential sound insulation funds to each community, seconded by Drenckhahn. All members voted in favor. Airport Relations Commission Minutes April 10, 2000/3 LEGISLATIVE UPDATE Verbrugge gave an overview of the airport mitigation legislation. He stated the general fund allocation was stripped from the bill along with the sales tax component. He further stated the mitigation plan portion is still intact, as is the TIF District. Verbrugge stated that the most important part of the legislation was getting the mitigation plan in place. MASAC UPDATE Staricha gave an overview of the March 31, 2000 MASAC meeting. He stated there was a quick, but extensive review of the current status of the Part 150 Update process. Verbrugge stated Jeff Hamiel, Executive Director of the Metropolitan Airports Commission, was the featured guest speaker and spoke briefly on Mr. Hamiel's background. Staricha stated he would not be able to attend the April 25 meeting. Thorkildson, who is the MASAC Alternate representative, stated he would attend in his absence. ADJOURNMENT Upon motion by Zoberi, seconded by Kreitz the Commission members adjourned the meeting at 8:35 p.m. mis DATE SECRETARY