Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
07/14/1987 - Airport Relations Commission
AGENDA EAGAN AIRPORT RELATIONS COMMITTEE TUESDAY JULY 14, 1987 7:00 P.M. EAGAN MUNICIPAL CENTER CONFERENCE ROOMS A & B I. ROLL CALL AND APPROVAL OF MINUTES II. OLD BUSINESS A. Update on FAR Part 150 Study B. Eagan- Mendota Heights Corridor Study C. Noise Budget Agreement III. NEW BUSINESS A. Goals and Priorities for Airport Relations Committee IV. DISTRIBUTION A. Aircraft Profiles V. OTHER BUSINESS VI. ADJOURNMENT MEMO TO: CHAIRMAN GUSTIN & ALL MEMBERS OF THE AIRPORT RELATIONS COMMITTEE FROM: JON HOHENSTEIN, ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT DATE: JULY 8, 1987 SUBJECT: AIRPORT RELATIONS COMMITTEE MEETING FOR JULY 14, 1987 I. MINUTES Enclosed on pages 1 through 2, you will find minutes of the Airport Relations Committee Meeting for May 12, 1987. These minutes, subject to any change, require approval by the Committee. II. OLD BUSINESS A. Update on FAR Part 150 Study -- Enclosed in your packet on pages through is a copy of the executed resolution passed by the Eagan City Council pertinent to the FAR Part 150 Study. Public hearing on the study closed on Friday, June 26 and, with approval from the Metropolitan Airports Commission, will be forwarded to the FAA for a review not to exceed 6 months in duration. Also enclosed on pages 1 through you will find correspondence from City staff to the Metropolitan Council under resulting Metropolitan Council action pertinent to the FAR Part 150 Study. The Council had under consideration the use of the Part 150 results and assumptions to update the noise policy contours for the Metropolitan Development Guide Plan. Because blanket use of those assumptions absent are responsible amendment for the Corridor would have served to sanction the unilateral actions of the airport in this area, staff objected to this matter and had it appropriately modified as you will note in the attachment. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: No action is required on this item at this time. B. Eagan— Mendota Heights Corridor Study - -Staff has held a preliminary meeting with airport representatives on the City of Mendota Heights to outline certain perimeters for the study. However, the operations committee has not yet met to address this issue. Therefore, there is little to report on this matter at this time. If further information comes to light between now and the evening of the meeting, staff will present it to you at that time. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: No action is required on this item at this time. C. Noise Budget Agreement -- Enclosed on pages through 10 you will find information pertinent to the Noise Budget Agreements negotiated by MAC staff with the airlines. As you may be aware, there has been considerable discussion in the press concerning MAC Chairman Glumack's assertion that the noise problem is being addressed through a mechanism of voluntary agreements. Among the principle attachments, you will find the advertisement illustrating the relationship of current noise energy to the phased noise reductions which were the subject of the voluntary agreements. Staff would, however, direct your attention to the St. Paul Pioneer Press Dispatch article dated June 24th and found on pages U ___ through 1% in which MPCA representative Dave Kelso indic noise energy reduction would translate to an imperceptible level of real noise abatement in the first phases. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: No action is required on this item at this time. III. NEW BUSINESS A. Goals and Priorities for Airport Relations Committee - -As discussed in past meetings, the action concerning the Eagan- Mendota Heights Corridor Study represent a significant punctuation for the activities of the Airport Relations Committee. Therefore, it would be appropriate to consider what priorities and goals the group deems important for future consideration. Certainly a need for the Committee remains, but the nature of its work may redefine the frequency of its meetings or the focus of them. Staff would present for your consideration the following functions or activities which might be considered in your priorities for the remainder of the year: 1. Monitoring of the Eagan- Mendota Heights Corridor Study - From time to time over the next several months, City staff will bring the matter of the Corridor Study to the Committee for its input and review. This matter has been a priority in the past and it is not unreasonable to assume that it will continue to be so. 2. Runway 4/22 Extension - The environmental impact statement and final recommendations on the Runway 4/22 Extension will require oversight and review by the Committee. The Committee has taken tentative action on this matter in the past and would be in a positive position to review any environmental evaluation of the extension and its related procedures. 3. Metropolitan Council Noise Policy Contours - In concert with our sight and review of the Corridor Study, review and input to the Metropolitan Council Policy Contour update would be an appropriate consideration for the Committee. 4. Model Noise Ordinance - While the review and adoption of the Metropolitan Council's Model Noise Ordinance appropriately falls to the Advisory Planning Commission, it may request input from the Airport Relations Committee pertinent to its expertise in the area. Treating this item as a goal may be contingent upon a request for action by the Planning Commission. 5. Implementation of Part 150 Elements - Certain elements of the Part 150 Program require continued monitoring by the Committee or may require implementation assistance if the City wishes to become active when involved in them. These suggestions are meant to serve as a beginning for point for Committee discussions. Staff intends to treat this portion of the Committee meeting as a brainstorming session to discuss appropriate roles and objectives for the Committee. Please give this matter some thought in anticipation of the meeting and jot down any comments on these or additional items you would like to have considered as priorities for the Committee. Upon completion of a list of goals and priorities, it would be appropriate to forward them to the City Council for their review and approval. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To develop a list of goals and priorities for future meetings of the Airport Relations Committee. IV. DISTRIBUTION A. Aircraft Profiles -- Enclosed on pages _14 through 1J you will find copies of profile sheets describing the various aircraft operating at Minneapolis -St. Paul International Airport. I am sure most, if not all of you, can identify all of these aircrafts rather easily but for those of you who wish a quick reference or want to review the characteristics of each aircraft, staff provides the enclosure. • • • V. OTHER BUSINESS A. National FAA Complaint Line - -By way of information, the Federal Aviation Administration has set up a National Complaint Line to handle concerns not adequately addressed at the regional level. This complaint system is particularly interested in concerns regarding tracks or elevations of aircraft and they have guaranteed that they will return all phone calls received. The number is toll free. It is 1- 800 -FAA -SURE (322- 7873). This number has been added to the information we distribute to the local press. IV. ADJOURNMENT Due to the shortness of the agenda, an effort will be made to adjourn the meeting no later than 8:30 p.m. Adm istrative Assistant cc: Tom Hedges, City Administrator Dale Runkle, City Planner Paul Hauke, City Attorney JH /af CITY OF EAGAN RESOLUTION CONCERNING THE MAC FAR PART 150 STUDY WHEREAS, the Metropolitan Airports Commission (MAC) has undertaken the Federal Aviation Regulation (FAR) Part 150 Study for purposes of providing a comprehensive noise abatement plan and procuring federal funding assistance for the implementation of such plan, and WHEREAS, FAR Part 150 requires a review and assessment of both operational and land use alternatives appropriate to the region, and WHEREAS, the City of Eagan has and continues to support the airport as a regional amenity and with respect to its environment, has and continues to support noise abatement strategies and the study of alternatives to reduce noise impacts from current levels, and WHEREAS, the City of Eagan has anticipated noise impacts to the extent possible based upon representations of the MAC and the FAA and has maintained or modified land use planning and zoning to provide a substantial area of compatible land use, and WHEREAS, the MAC has recommended a Noise Compatibility Program as part the FAR Part 150 submittals incorporating both operational and land use elements and has requested comment on the program from the public and effected agencies at a public hearing on May 21, 1987, and WHEREAS, the conduct of the FAR Part 150 Study process has resulted in an uneven treatment of its elements, input regarding those elements and the effected communities and, therefore, conclusions of widely varied substance and adequacy, and WHEREAS, given the qualifications above, the City of Eagan finds certain elements of the Noise Compatibility Plan to be reasonable and supportable and others to be unnecessarily detrimental, poorly substantiated and absent adequate public notice given the gravity of their impact, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City of Eagan supports the general concept of the FAR Part 150 Study Noise Abatement Program and its operational elements with the following qualifications; 1. NA2 - Exempt the Quietest Stage 3 Aircraft from Noise Abatement Flight Tracks - Differential analysis does not yet exist to substantively justify the costs of this systematic degradation of noise abatement flight tracks such as those in the Eagan - Mendota Heights Corridor. Moreover, the inclusion of DC -10, L- 1011 and 747 aircraft in the Stage 3 definition places an undue burden on residential areas when commercial - industrial alternatives exist. Absent adequate analysis and public process, the City cannot support this element. 2. NA3 - Negotiate with the Airlines a User Fee to be Levied on Landings by Stage 1 and Stage 2 Aircraft, with Revenues to be Used for Noise Compatibility Programs -The City of Eagan strongly supports the use of differential landing fees to increase operating costs for noisier aircraft. By introducing 3. an economic disincentive, airlines' financial decisions will tend toward quieter aircraft while dedicating the proceeds to the reduction of noise impacts. 3. NA4 - Relocate Runway 4 -22 to the South of Runway 11L -29R -The City of Eagan reserves comment on this element until full documentation of its impacts is available. The obvious benefits of the relocation to the Preferential Runway System (PRS) may be offset by new or expanded effected populations. If the extension is necessary to expand airport capacity, it should be analyzed in that light, but its noise abatement benefit must be proven before the City can support it. 4. NA7 - Negotiate New and Binding Agreements with the Operators for Nighttime Use; et. seq -The City of Eagan strongly supports the maintenance of low volumes of nighttime operations as such are among the most detrimental to an acceptable noise environment. 5. NA9 - Obtain FAA Agreement to Implement the Cedar Avenue Procedure for Aircraft Departing Runway 22 -The City of Eagan reserves comment on this element until full documentation of its impacts is available. It is not yet proven that the procedure enhances PRS capacity, abates noise or will be flown under the Part 150 Study assumptions. Absent adequate documentation, support of this element would not be appropriate. 6. NA10 - Tighten Up Procedures for Keeping Aircraft Departing Runways 11L and 11R to the "Eagan Corridor" -The City of Eagan introduced this element of the Part 150 Study and believes the concept to be integral to its support of the study. To date, however, it has not been adequately addressed. a. Established Corridor - The established land use corridor was based on representations of the MAC and FAA concerning historic flight track assumptions. These assumptions are no longer in use by the tower. b. Prescribed Procedure - The City of Eagan requested a review of the procedure in place at the outset of the Part 150 Study. The procedures were modified in a tower order dated ten days after the Eagan request. In essence, the consultant then studied compliance with a procedure implemented after the study began, bearing marginal relationship to the land use provided. c. Non- Compliance - The consultant's "compliance study" which identifies eighteen percent non - compliance lasted less than one day and has not been supported by recent MAC and HNTB studies. Moreover, these studies have shown up to two - thirds of all departures are more than five,degrees deviant from the established land use corridor assumptions. d. Impact - The consultant's conclusion of minor impact as a result of corridor compliance was graphically refuted by comparison of its original and modified Part 150 base maps. Dramatic variations in impact area resulted from modified concentrations within the same operational area. Therefore, substantial benefits can accrue from adequate operational standards. e. Qualified Support - The City must predicate its support of the Part 150 Study on the adequate study of and acceptable findings concerning the Eagan- Mendota Heights Corridor. A study has been approved by the MAC to address the best means of utilizing appropriate flight track modifications to place the worst of the impact at the middle of the compatible land use. Only upon acceptable completion of the study, will the City endorse this element of the Program. 7. NAl2 - Enforce and Optimize Nighttime Run -up Policy -The City of Eagan strongly supports the enforcement of the nighttime run up policy. Further, it encourages the installation of equipment and adoption of procedures necessary to mitigate run -up noise impacts. 8. NA13 - Improve the Monitoring and Enforcement of All Noise Abatement Measures -The City of Eagan strongly supports this element, particularly with respect to off - airport noise monitoring. Permanent monitoring locations should be located in noise sensitive areas of all noise impacted communities. 9. NA14 - Install a Microwave Landing System at MSP -The City of Eagan strongly supports the early installation of MLS and other navigational aid systems to better control flight tracks and altitudes over the effected communities. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City of Eagan supports the FAR Part 150 Study Noise Abatement Program land use elements with the following qualifications: 1. Preventative Land Use Measures (LU1 -LU5) - The City of Eagan is generally compliant with the Metropolitan Council Guidelines. Further it supports the concepts of zoning performance standards and the necessary building code revisions to implement them. 2. Corrective Land Use Measures (LU6 -LU10) - The City of Eagan will consider soundproofing of public and private buildings, acquisition of developed property and purchase guarantees as potential corrective strategies, provided the City has the right of review and approval of any such program. The City will only consider these alternatives when operational means of noise abatement have been exhausted. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City of Eagan does not recognize the validity of the 1987 and 1992 Noise Exposure Maps upon which the land use elements are predicated because: 1. Flight track assumptions in the Eagan- Mendota Heights Corridor area are neither historically supported nor consistant with the cited Metropolitan Council guidelines. 5. 2. Flight track assumptions in the Eagan- Mendota Heights area fan air traffic unnecessarily thereby impacting residential areas and underutilizing the noise absorbing capacity of the compatible corridor. 3. No differential analysis exists showing current operations to be the most effective use of the noise compatible corridor. 4. Certain residential areas lying within the Ldn 65 contour are not depicted as such and certain noise sensitive public facilities are misrepresented or omitted. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that staff be directed to prepare oral and written comments consistent with these findings for introduction into the public record of the Metropolitan Airports Commission. CITY OF EAGAN CITY COUNCIL i t , By: _ a. . L T IsM -.o Attest: I •. � �� 11.1. Its g - rk Motion made by: SMITH Seconded by: WACHTER Those in favor: ALL Those against: NONE Dated: MAY 19, 1987 CERTIFICATION I, E.J. VanOverbeke, Clerk of the City of Eagan, Dakota County, Minnesota, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted by the City Council of the City of Eagan, Dakota County, Minnesota, in a regular meeting thereof assembled this day of , 1987. 1/Vja E.J anOverbeke, Ci y Clerk City of Eagan . r I ,1►i►tt city of eagan 3830 PILOT KNOB ROAD, P.O. BOX 21199 BEA BLOMQUIST EAGAN, MINNESOTA 55121 Mayor PHONE: (612) 454 -8100 THOMAS EGAN June 23, 19 8 7 JAMES A. SMITH VIC ELLISON THEODORE WACHTER STEVE REEFE Council Members CHAIRMAN, METROPOLITAN COUNCIL THOMAS HEDGES City Administrator 300 METRO SQUARE BUILDING EUGENE VAN OVERBEKE ST. PAUL, MN 55101 City Clerk RE: TAC \TAB POSITION STATEMENT ON FAR PART 150 STUDY Dear Mr. Keefe: Permit me to take this opportunity to comment on one element of the TAC /TAB Position Statement on the FAR Part 150 Study as it appears in the Metropolitan Systems Committee packet. The City of Eagan would request that the first position, concerning the use of Part 150 assumptions and contours in a revision of the Policy Contours, be modified to recognize the compatible land use planning that has occurred in the Eagan - Mendota Heights area to date. The flight track assumptions used in the Part 150 Study for the area southeast of MSP are so radically different from those in the original Policy Contours that they fail to reasonably utilize the noise compatible land uses in place while severely impacting residential neighborhoods to the north and south. The City of Eagan has protested this failure to acknowledge the metropolitan planning initiative inherent in the contours and the contributions of the City to plan responsibly in that area. The City would encourage the Council to acknowledge the Eagan - Mendota Heights Corridor Study and the need to establish operational standards more consistant with existing compatible land uses before undertaking a revision of the Policy Contours. Failure to do so will tend to sanction the unreasonable assumptions made by the Part 150 Study in the areas southeast of the airport. If you have any questions in this regard, please contact Jon Hohenstein of our office. Thank you for your kind attention to this matter. Sinc rely ours, Thomas L. Hedges City Administrate cc: Mary K. Martin Chauncey Case THE LONE OAK TREE...THE SYMBOL OF STRENGTH AND GROWTH IN OUR COMMUNITY 1. Metropolitan Council Meeting of June 25, 1987 Business Item: C -4 M E T R O P O L I T A N C O U N C I L Suite 300 Metro Square Building, St. Paul, Minnesota 55101 REPORT OF THE METROPOLITAN SYSTEMS COMMITTEE Referral Report No. 87 -60 DATE: June 18, 1987 TO: Metropolitan Council SUBJECT: MSP FAR Part 150 Land Use Compatibility Study, Referral #14204 -1 BACKGROUND At its meeting of June 16, 1987, the Metro Systems Committee reviewed and C approved comments on the Metropolitan Airports Commission (MAC) FAR Part 150 land use compatibility study for Minneapolis -St. Paul International Airport S' (MSP). The study consists of airport noise exposure maps for 1987 and 1992, and a noise compatibility program which includes land use management actions. This is an FAA program designed for application primarily at hub airports across the United States that are experiencing aircraft noise problems. T E' ISSUES AND CONCERNS M Committee members asked for additional language in Recommendation #1 to clarify that finding the Part 150 Program consistent with Council policy does not represent an endorsement of the Runway 4/22 extension, for which separate review and documentation is necessary. It was also asked that Recommendation #5 be changed to say the Council endorses the comments and recommendations of the TAB and that those recommendations be stated. RECOMMENDATIONS 1. That the overall FAR Part 150 Program be found consistent with Council Policy (this does not represent an endorsement of the Runway 4/22 extension for which separate review and documentation will be necessary). 2. Land use measures approved as part of the MSP Part 150 noise compatibility program, and eligible for implementation, should be reflected in the Commission's next capital improvement program. 3. That all parties affected by the Part 150 program support efforts to increase the Federal Trust Fund monies to be allocated for noise abatement projects and activities. 4. That implementation of the 150 program be conducted with strong inter- agency coordination. 5. That the Council endorse and forward to MAC the attached comments and recommendations of the TAB. Respectfully submitted, Carol Flynn, Chair S. POSITION STATEMENT OF THE TECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE AND TRANSPORTATION ADVISORY BOARD ON THE FAR PART 150 STUDY FOR MSP INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT The Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) and Transportation Advisory Board (TAB) serve as advisory committees of the Metropolitan Council. The TAC and TAB are appointed from among public agencies, local communities and private citizens to provide an established forum on transportation matters within the metropolitan area. The following recommendations have been approved by the TAB. 1. The assumptions and contours used in the Part 150 Study should be incorporated in a revision of the Metropolitan Council Policy Contours. The Council is responsible for revising the Policy Contours. Upon completion of this process, MAC should incorporate any changes in the Contours in future revisions of the Part 150 Study. Discussion: The Metropolitan Council's Policy Contours need to be updated to reflect the forecast assumptions used in the Part 150 Study. This material should then be incorporated into future revisions of the Part 150 Study and the Council's Aviation Chapter. 2. The Part 150 Study should include a map describing a 1992 "do nothing" scenario. Discussion: Many major studies frequently include a "do nothing" alternative that allows comparison of proposed improvements with the impact of making no improvement. In addition, many of the noise abatement measures are based on controversial or speculative concepts for which there is strong possibility that the measure will not be implemented. Adoption of a noise budget, extension of Runway 4 -22, and the use of the "Cedar Avenue procedure" are key components of the noise abatement program, yet meet the most resistance from affected parties. Other measures involve voluntary committments that may or may not be honored. Adding a "do nothing" map would provide a point of reference in the evaluation and would improve the Part 150 Study's comprehensiveness. Metropolitan Council Meeting of June 25, 1987 Amendment to Bus. Item: C -4 M E T R O P O L I T A N C O U N C I L Suite 300 Metro Square Building, Saint Paul, Minnesota 55101 DATE: June 25, 1987 TO: Metropolitan Council FROM: Metropolitan Systems Committee SUBJECT: Business Item C -4, MSP FAR Part 150 Land Use Compatibility Study, Referral 14204 -1 The Council has received a request from the city of Eagan as regards the review of the MAC FAR Part 150 Study. Since this information was received after the Metro Systems Committee discussion of the study, an amendment to recommendation number five (TAB item #1) is proposed. 1. The assumptions and contours used in the Part 150 Study should be incorporated in a revision of the Metropolitan Council Policy Contours. The Council is responsible for revising the Policy Contours and will not recommend changes in assumptions regarding aircraft flight tracks until separate evaluations on the Eagan Corridor and Runway 4/22 flight paths are reviewed. Upon completion of this process, MAC should incorporate any changes in the contours in future revisions of the Part 150 Study. • DPF385 I , .. . ---.,-. ,•.,''..-..',: - ,.'.„--- -- '..N; ..:,...:-',...: -- 4 METRO MONITOR, June 1987 MAC working on voluntary ,_.,.::„.,,,,...7...,,:i,:,.::2„,:l ,::.,„ pact with airlines to cut noise mammoth slingshot is stretched to the break- MAC meeting. ing point on the airport runway. In its sling is - "We've been giving for years," responded Rick a big commercial jet, its engitk ilent. The Jellinger, president of the South Metro Airport Action - slingshot releases, catapultin44,1* t quietly Council. The council is made up mostly of south .. . into the skies. Once high enough, thO pites its Minneapolis residents affected by aircraft noise. "We 4 . . ...., .. , . noisy engines without disturbing rest ' 4.4*.. ow and need to count on something other than market forces soars away. : to give us relief," he said. ..'-',,- That's an idea planners have actuall3t how Jellinger and others who wail the ordinance fear the to reduce the impact of aircraft noise o,..:v.1.1,,,, s voluntary approach by the 4 won't stand up to ;_. -1 4' -, living near the Minneapolis-St. Paul Inc . .: , =y.,01 market forces over the nextfFp, ars or so. Five Airport. ;:: years is the period before afkimiarchases of newer, They've heard others. Like huge tunne '1).1 ..w the quieter aircraft will begin tc(„4 4 effect. .., runway in which aircraft can land or take #g; . 4 , ;„"_ "We need an agreement or; it ., g that will yie10 muffling their noise Or 4. . this attached to : noise ._ „ noise reductions that are meig';',. onsistent wittr;ig",. telephone poles would be giant balls desig , to. :,,i3otA, the noise budget and enforcettlii%1, .4 Minneap . . • . _ . sound magnets to suck up the noise. 1; ,, 4 , 7? -4 A - . Council Member Steve Crametro -.....,, 4,7 .. , ,,,,45,1,:,, - , •1".$4 , ,, ,6, 4) , Although these ideas have yet to gain cre - big le- The MAC prefers a voluntaty*Ott.00444,,i, - , ,_......,... -. another idea has It's a voluntary cutback of .., ., ordinance that the airlines ant(5-000Wititi" the airlines themselves. ';; ilA' ''',* could tie up ili:(t*:;A,iRtiii„O jr 1-.. -:•,•_ , . - ,..„-„,,,,,,, - „,i; - ,z.-..; e44 The Metropolitan Airports Commission (M. cA„,,.-.- ,:. i. -rs, as both groups have $.11 ,,,,, , Ac, also voted in April to try to work out a voluntary arn44'=2 to avoid an adverSarla1.140,W0r110*. ment with the six airlines that use the airpomittifiege# which- fund aFppf,tiffeeOtqf:M4,°.Xn •• 7:2; ▪ l',*: 44 the end of June no agreement has been reaebeil'Ot:A airlines cil*ct t4 . i l* MAC said it will consider adopting what (fiiis'.':' .',::!.t..4h4.,,trelieve-•-iti**::titni(th*#,1411ity to ebYtfpou..4044: , .• • -. - - ... far avoided noise budget ordinance.-4?:; 11,t11,11 to cut jobs. - The proposed ordinance is the stick the MAC halfli fof04.Northwest Airlines to . - . . to encourage the airlines to voluntarily cut back on " reduce 20 Oercp,t'91-,4Vights, according to Ben . . ' noise. The ordinance would limit the amount of npise vice president of each airline could produce at the airport, asses,sin&:7,,,':7 i could mean the loss of about 1,400 jobs. .' ':'-. - - • fines if limits are broken. -.-;'' generates about 80 percent of the airport's Noise would be reduced to 1984 1ei.T.liAltat"W4..'•;s,,,,W flights.„„_,. -,, ,, - , - ,.q....,V , ; : f= 7 ,,---;:, when an upsurge in the number of flights.,tcrnkning "Tht" will ruin air • -,- - . . from the deregulation of the airline.,inidltioietnade the commerce ir4120eglotyor.foreNc!rthwest to leave noise intolerable to many nearby rvidents. The goal the area are41,,-Ipyervat,O;Sramer.S4iid.,.:In the of the ordinance would be a 22 peri6t reduction worst ease tfee pette4of tho,'dailjkflights from the noise level of August 1986, to -be reached by would be ' , which represents49ss than onPni^.4.4,, , ...,. 1990 An initial cut of 11 percent would go into effect tenth of ortelercent of jobs lost in the'regiot's June 15. That first cut, however, has already occurred, economy." largely through the merger of Northwest and Republic In its recent session, the Minnesota State .• . . . Airlines and the resulting decrease in flights. Legislature told the MAC to adopt a long-term • --: ,, --j The voluntary agreement MAC seeks calls for a comprehensive plan for the airport that describes slightly larger cut in noise, 24 percent, but with a noise impacts on neighboring communities. • .. ,, - • - , ....- , .„ later deadline of 1992. The plan, to be submitted to the legislature by the • .. . .., . .... ,. . . • _ „ _. „ . , MAC is trying to balance the desire of nearby end of 1988, must also describe aviation demand, -• -- residents for quieter skies with the airlines' desire to airport capacity, financial estimates for future • survive and profit amid growing competition. development and how that development would con- , .: "were trying to come up with an agreement where form with regional and local systems such as sewers everybody wins—but everybody's got to give a little," and roads. • :.--!'.: ;.,t - r.=';i'. ‘.--`, .. ' -,::':::..--f:.:N.':-:.4 said MAC Chair Harold Greenwood at the April I I. Jim Martin --- --i.",-..-----.., :V." ' .. '-,-",-, 7 -f? '7 1, ,' 7 . ', ,777,. - ?;",: t ... \-- 1::"7-:s :': '-' ?„ . r . ' ''' ' -5- : '''''' - '..:.''', ,:;": '` ' -' '": ----'' ' :, ' '". --: -: ,:;'-'- . ': ; ' - ':-,- 1 '''' ''..,,,',' ;,:::-...,:° - 1 :'; '-' '..: - ',.`A4 , ' ',. :'' ..'•:: : :'• .:; ,- ' ' - ': -5 : 3 - ,-.:e-k .- N , i' ,r.r ‘ ; -i:-Tvi?'- - tiA - -77.: ,, .... , r4f:-.."1"*":• , `.`ti-i".' /* ''.',/./-J--IL:,•'!!›,-,:t.,,,-.-:.t.,;:t"'..;k4'.'1,41-,.s*!-,..:1,,, uiugy wi( 5 § � ij; C 1 S i � $ y a I�s ,...... ■ � M - i.. .c < t x ��� f " �' ,' w �,,, ° c +u ` v s x f s - C .. •^ cd S'y V O .E ' ■ 0-0> > t) e0 C'l r {' . cau. - = E III, y c s��� Ui o tee.; oo � o C ,, r s n 3f &f w C' N 7 : : � ' C " o O TJ � o t a' 4`i' 3 .E 0 a o ro A.0 > c 7 cC2 3 3 . E i a =. 0 c O _ "p w* , h t 3 s $r CL L 'a Q �, v ° m ce of fO g.„ o s i . n y "s , I.. a O o a •p C p .c — A — C a O TI L r fi' • Q v� ly O 3 e '.. ai z q 4 i r ' $ t3� N c0 N ..., a O .., �a `6 �"' C • Pe g"S b al — � ` s* *� i d C O ■�� � f • r ' $ 3 �{ ° r7 w ._. CO 69 O . >", 0 w •2 4 LI o a • ' rl C .D ... ny N a 1-a. , % : a £ t r. 2 . • u g = !V `° ' li i 0 ; . z C Ti, u c o ' c a 1 M y f 1 N C. b ry r rY q a v � d p I O a. C y 4� 1< � ' s�ra� Y, . � f� 3� �^ 3 �. a) �.a E ., ♦+ 0,. vA .a ° 'j O • �o ai c°CE o C a p s a t'"'' '( a s.. '' i . F C r 2 a te 2 L' u E ° "g 06-'6 - 1:' �d E , ° . / �, s -'t4 ,, ,oO u C o u a3 E o v. iS4,Yx�aY, a 1 a a g O agC7 O c0 1 .3 a, t, , ' ' ` 8 ^c .�^b c 'a ,CE r °.• . ° 3 c , : ,' 1 ., ,�" 4 I� 't a o E o ,AT .2E 0 . D Ey .a o aa c ) _ v u ( , � ^ ' � . *( ., 6) .., a ,p C a . v, 0 U a O C 0 a a A V/ ,, $ w` az t ;. g ,I I. cA v � � 6.' '0 1p . G I. �O T y > X R ° ~ C L _ A, 0 , .5 5� h' t � r,y5 10, ,II C7 3 O $ y S''' t! E. "" C O 'e -� y CA C'(7 • �n _ CI° 44 ! € d.'c ,, " a '6' q '� . #� a ° C 3 4 2 ► c� C ... O M • O C • y A4 -fA , t P. Q s _ a b O .a^ o -° •^.I �� •°-,'-,,,,,,x,4''' � ' ea t. � Q r oo ° �� o uu�m ��y� �vE, 6' `2 EC�y ooroc �� EE3 co G) . - c Z , s y a � a a to w H as L Q' 5 c0 a pp O 'Q�.. �"� 17'3 -0 z No >'• � a 2 c 0 000 r °�aao 3 0 ;'E o.c °O 5 UMW. 4 a ea )a 3 a ~o.w i « ~LA Qas • a) > ° v �.c•a° 3 u� �e s v a) a �I vi O a ' b _ N '- C— fn ' , i... I C vi E' I O C • O • �I y�"^„ ." t) O 3 p y� O a c7 , 4 y a C> C a O w a ty a t : C a a (n O Q t- 'n 4n ' E • �, ° -c° c 241 a ›: ,.., � O X C u c 'al L y o o N E 'Li E' a)v ° > .., C a c. p a p a u v, ca „ z y � a a is o E c ■ C).< a 2 ° C ..,>" 'b w . c C 0 A h 41 O E g T T y .5 a �. •_ >O . �... v Q � ° 0o %)�aui c°�°U°` � «. `V �p ?+� o�= C .2) y .o �C � c u aN L a o. N N O C co Q O .., -- C ',]" 7-• .c E O t' U• 71 a a �. Pi t:J ti >31- - .c' „.9 44: :3 Q>c0.,c) e � > mac. = . - . cb c. -° c g -, A . , 2 C ' O° ,`..' E c c v. oq p a * a _ c 2 v C 00 W ° . % 4 •� o ,4) czi R a oAa 4.24 .0 .. U O U . - a 2 . O .4 r: 'fl v t 7 `.� =‘ _ •C O = 6,4 . «, R. ti . ^ L-).6).0 ' 2,4) �' a =•`-'••',' . 0 3 �y V] O ^ � 0 C p c .,_ , u > E a` O q E c x' ^ oA 0 a 'ca s E 0.) •:•%1 U . E w , ro o� a): 0 a v o ' +� I T7 cd T ca O � ....• t7 y.., 'O C C T T of O S cy ✓, O N ^ C 'fl a ^T �E> a,. HcaoO O 3cE'a� ^,,.. c' °0 a ca'-a3 c v � 3'cvv�cvna ° iccoN oo i ° , 0... ° °c -ate ca �� 0 --0 -,c.= - , 0 . r, 0 0 ••, > u c w. � o I" ° u H ..'c a cs c-° .e'° ti a) �_ E - 3 w o„ O.,U�' u 0 o _, 2' 5 m �Ly ia0 o ^ 01 .5 , o c 'E . `°coD" ) O 3 �;a scc C c L 6- ° c m is EQ ° o.-C7 ` o.c c° )'v c°: • 2 aQ: ' a =. ° L p= ` c ` cr' u c a 7 a - ' - '(=1. 0 C - O O �. r . ' C �. a s �. ° a' O 4 ; 13 ; a j a x ...._ ca a ca a oA ca ' v 0,14- � a .1.4 ~� av�, ca o .3 � -- a. fa. ca o� > c 3 o ca 5 E �� a Q u� c S a 3F� u n n au 4 ^. H V V1 O C (1.) a . o c � ai C .: 'ca °) a C a a , `° 3 CLe r X p o a E 3 u•= ^ v = a o ^ aai = o • a C ov. x ° - a� a co • �") a " . w p - . ` .• 0 a 4 e ' .'.Te a s p E ' . p - G. 5 I ca ) t •T. E c� `.1) G ca 'e a � . 0 o o •� a s 3 y o hU u E. �- O Z' a I o?'` 3 ° c° '_ �'0.� ='' a E s � 4 C T. L N . O a u° N C_ a ' ^ E V ° m C.fl C C O y C X C ., c0 C c O O E _ T 0 > x% E a =o a pu•^ „ co ° a c ti u cy u cao ...>e o ' ._o on cV -2 -' ro i °=N ° ;, • ° V c° c) o o' >'- D- a a c° ) a a�i 2 $ , g =.E2o�3 `-°o `10 0 • y= ( . - a . a3 � o o ra �� E LL c a � C oa c $ w c 0 o.o EA ' n C i I - - ij c y a . a U O I o , c � o 'O O w � '�. � > - _ 1.g. . ..°,�v a u ). 3 = i 0 acca n fl a y ^ 'v._.5a•. u "li �a { j y 7 a 3 O.• - c a a a C ca 'b cc a v, a • g w E ' . a- .te .0 a' a "�, c D 3 • - (1 V u o J, a 3. a c a ai > a 0 v - cO c • C� E U.c� =u> ac),a- � zoou m: ..., p . ° c 2 c moo. 04:. , b , o u ^ Q oo. ¢ ; p `� o p.E `r u - >' ? E. a au c - 4 u^ _., ,,, u a ti Q C . O j, C C a' a —° a = ^ c«. 'D • v v . ` 5 C ca E a E a cc < 4- . � N C • C ° 4-.. ¢ c O ', ¢ Gl 77 O 'fl .D N c " • ,, „„ ' fl L v .! ._ 0 C o a U z Z CD a V) � ._Z .a U ° � a3[L A ca c a .0 T3 0 0 3 c � o ..%4 -C c I1—.. • 0) co N u) C o > N N 00: .. u �-. ...... j d 1. c. ,' C,,, N C O v =0.8 8 ..-t....---....... r vi C 0'N OCR OO�TO VL�p O S cy� c a`b E eo v, u c N N,g.r F u� c d� o �oo o C 0 o u E .0 ffi E- -. E ' o 5 05 . ! iII ' u cu NEu `h 'ow ° t' C � ° T c. c ° yv 0>�' 0 . o c 0 O 8. = . C OTJ C Co 2 • ax y • = 0 O • U �E�� > °V x.� v 3 w �oG y'� ao4 � �a� II MIME ' ^ C be v3 " � E c " •�v '^ C H. u'C7 '' y 7 . 0 V N V b 'cl b `d N C 00 VJ j 0 ca „b 3 0 " o c 9 0.-. c -u = �•° c ~. -= �� u te 3 m N . ' 7i w °02 ,te a) 7) E . E . ?�x � y .� C N t p `d u 'E '-5 E o.d•o*° '.'e, [ E - c i "*".1.3-1' E bw U_.. O O ..i.1-='0,. C T.. C �E „ � p O E C E o , oo ea Y .r.r u °5 Cu ° > 0 E ff '� u s ., ; ° °2()15g'8' v .288g E > . L C.T'� R) f-. C.O Q'd N u N c > 4. ° L . . ..b 7. C �• y C O E .. 7 aV.0. O .) V >it as ' � c N z yy C T „ y, , " i, . u vi p'C N �D U 0> C ... Q O .O V 0. 00 > O y . . . . - ',5 W O N .0 •� u pp N u N O u M u y C .4 y o o N 4 0 N >. r a. _ '''. 0 • C GL E N N U.r b .rOC 'A .. as ° O ° - ''in _ y 'C r u Cr) 4l '.'. y OQ L . fO N y N 4 1'7:2 ( 91 N 0 u C u o e• N 0 i o c° 3 o °= �o o $ E.." co °E e�wB *-o ...Et:2- ou a liS 4H .5.6, • -0 °oEo r, -ca z `'Ee O E s ���� // VJ o �oy =�o�Cm y� E . � 7 F- E o'o'u ° E= u¢ ...� E a' . .- 0. c o ■Amn - 9141 , :rNi:44:::' , ; ,, ,......:.:..:....,: . ':-E , : , :i:...! : *,,,„.. u y� �0 � ° U x x ' ":3R c0 U s N GL � � � f'n��� £ t �� ' � ;f : N L 3 � .-. wu: -✓ f , a, Ni" C o0 ^l'`) R as m W A '48v 'fit v: w = F2 14 y` f a # ..a , � 4 34N• s5'+ 4s - r, � �¢ 07 d .r u G 4 u > $ 3 C 3 E$)� a O C CC C7 k« N V g 4 , oo <V . a a � i w a o R. ' d u m e E � '-' a u a O Uc. ° r o a' >�a� c i° E a .5 o 0. ° c o E E E O Iflil N u �a N 1 ❑> uva E � .. Qc' >. -u� •--,U.° t.-), ) •- n C °:' g C e c0. -0 88 C N' > 0 rap1 °-) I" 3 ' g •tl" : . r).4 U• � °; � . C.. r+r�j -vow n'9Q.r ;i 3 r') y a �° � � 4 `g � 2.3 s �v 1 r� r S t `!'MrIM ' "J v °p i. « $ t ,,Ai � . f q �' . CO s � : `�' a � 6 4 ,P,, 9a`'" a, � Y € a' 1 V' r 'F ' i f;' x 4 M14 t ? t! �� '� >s u ° -• a` t i a �'l ' ' ' C's 1,10, kv d 4 ' a �'' a a' N ! A ° 3s 4 F+' a ,ca' `d eoE ,..= ttS i "s tL ' s> y � + N' ` ^ ` i q g � i x i au ` , r cr y q O B B g I U ,,;.f- t + 1 v.3 {Tt,. + " --. l + a te.{ = 8 n n + kF : q C q°al p (L :15 'd l Y t c'S q A a � iO .-d+ al p,?' O i ° ° «/ 61 y G bS i i" ir,14- Y `• rt r G , '{ F µ,#' % . � p; ?Ili .: fi � u v Z . •e � "� ' ` v 4 ' ,. �t ,� �., � { n.,.'* . a l e `a a � ; s x ,x 2 v Zr A. ▪ a > ono'° o s6 - a { a. ''x; tH } asF.�,r .. 1 i'l � � ? '� ` at �j a> _ / q i a 5 ..g a Z r t{ soda , y h :Y ., (1) 4 q d 8.41'.° j L. z q• p� i . k S ; ` t 3 • r y N g e , c an" • B a I, e: 4 4 S t ai x ;;„ .. i c P 41iP h Ii 1 h i y t p � v � 9 `-3 y t/i � O '+ t 'q. B fp ay g7 az° m P :7 'O ..+ ao if " t i 'i 3 .r� zg ""t - 6 k'''' �' p " '•u ' . � � , oo h o QO ;� ws:j � F s y j lt c f �'r�t�r2 4 � t •O 0 y na 0 t., 0 ° • . ' .`"aI ao ,, L ,?+a { , q t _ ? t- i , d+' 4 f t. ,:: C1 ° r h • t •,. r ,s, a '� s f f 'S ?r4 `R M# . `� „:...:, B 3 • o � ° o 7 n Yp i „ , i .„, a t • N ' 1 'O .2! a�p B ° G t 'rti ° fi r` ! ; 'f .r f . r•' 'y! i'r- i.a a) • ^ .° ° V _ al ', "8” 4, �.'., U tF`r { kr^-� t 4 r kra 'ti0. W * �` ;'irY 1 I if � s o° d v d u e x # M1 � w ; ,e 1 3 ,r,,, 1 .. a t 4 I y O y � Q § �b a" 4 i y tQ s` 4 t ? > N A O L .b W N ° N .7 . ^O CI 1:-*- d 4 � '�' f ` S �is t'�d' •?" Y '! _ .... P'�rr�e €i K r� 1alry, h>°n. of , a a 4"u'? q �js a ,a �� . ° p • ❑ A 1 .� > ate.. 'T'� ,- i'"`( � c , '. C7 , • . . g . — ° T. E q ° . ° °fir `f "` - ,.i ' '. 0 ,3 2 e °v6 ° . u -8— mr ' ; 1 H' 3 c a fax . 4 10 a . a$ r,.4 o a ` q S o ., � '- p } i y 1 4 . ., �fi _ d ' � 1 a i � � fi � ' afl . � p y 7 „ 0 = ;.,L VI 23 0 ' t: CI . a . a 0 CC 0 ''' N p .: 4 , r r ', ` pa* q a .+ .'9.. loot) ':- PM.° 14 '' m ,,, 4-4 i I lU l llfl i app y Ol y B B $ k 6 e W d °0 j 3" , f B +y} N * ,..,;11-7.-,„: y tns1F , s . P 1q .?...: ._, „,.. , VI Q a? 1i I 1 ! d ll 1 'N • a4 w r > • O > :d.,'' ° a) b ., t „ P ?'T Vf i , i ai 1 . '" •? x. � s 3 i �, ,£" t ,fit .r t ' � � � �a 2t ,�'' � "�^ " ay y yy �' t 4 )h': N O 5 A .§ s ao 1 *Ya°^.y„ s I 4 .,s, n 4 y 41, . ,, ° as. 8 as N li pp1 .d 'rt 10 S. n j wa ?r.f ; St ? . :. 1 r+4, j 1 �F Na a4{K :r a E7 •N •� � 1 0 ,,.. g. a t ° '`� . R�, 1;- i3:... { ; 4 � t k s' V, , ` ` g .'�. ' �S i�iY t ` t •� � g B � o a „��B � B d I O HhI R ! 4 D q �y i. 6 ~ � U n .O ki a ��qa oo ra 01 J °' QC o O m d .° u `ig E a° ° F- Fi.L� tc i��.° vS�> w . 4. 41 ; �' y ° �w ' a a q� q co) . r y � U. N .°.O n 0 s 9° 1°1')' ma* uu mo g . 0 .. NBo -, : $o a� a ° a � yam C °ua ° b a °'—'a� r W � ; ° N •° u 5 a' G t k df a 4Rr ;r ` � o G g•- 11111 B•u� °oaa �a v; o � \ W • ' as a° ° 0 a:, a a+ � • • c '4 a, ao 0 0 „ �J a`� o om o •O B .2", N Z Y o • gip+ ° gy'.� �� y' v ° ° c 150 CI >,.5 E" ` >, o q c0E °'s a° a ` ci ... C ;,. ° a o� c q ' g �C] t �� a U au�S ` . _DG� QQ0.°o O s- .2.. 8,. ,, . r te . , .1 0. , d N . r N• C i E.-F.43 O •e ,, o a. c. g H �A a• n s t °- G N d „,,....,..1,.._. a0 ctl 0 > y O , j a u; °„ 9 c (0.“:314.e. o o B l as W '' �i� corn = m °6 0: g+ � i i > B v o -lured r cum =c•ta�., damn 1ue baju According to court records, Dan - l was built in 1980. -_ forth was suspended from the practice of law in 1981 by the Wis- 1 Ward seat to be unoccupied Noise consin Supreme Court. He said he now is a self- employed legal con - i one week after Tedesco quits Continued from Page 1C sultant. Paul's 7th Ward will be with- needed suspend the rules and However, Anderson believes the The Wisconsin court said - City Council representative consider it. forth had been charged with ;- negotiations have put pressure on ing indecent liberties with chil- w e o after n T s the this summer than boost its y to Council member Kiki Sonnen ob- dren." He also pleaded guilt s elected i c to cil member. sco, jected, pointing out there will be no flight schedule during the peak charges related to his supplying 'esco had asked the council to vacancy a t until July hs 1. She been to have tr months of June, July and he nce represented in 16-year-old juvenile it one of his aides, Eileen a hearing at which candidates for thefli ht down by scheduling said the airline has kept proceedings, the court said. Dan - un il to omplete his term, and vacancies are heard. A vote is then more effi ently. forth's name then was Stephen taken, and the winner is seated im- h, and he later had it changed ;ever, one council member mediately. I have to believe 1001ess flights through court proceedings, accord - 1 Tuesday at a procedural de- But City Attorney Ed Starr said a day is perceptible," Anderson i to Ramsey County prosecutor •e that would have allowed Y Yd Daniel Hollihan. to be sworn in July 1, the the appointment does not take ef- "You'll have pockets of people fect until the mayor signs it and it that notice a reduction ter Tedesco leaves. ction in noise be- Hollihan said Danforth met the city attorney advised the is publishe• four boys a Y Y published. cause of a reduction in flights over Y about 1983, when he was 1 to vote Weida m Tuesday Saying she wanted other appli- their , houses," Kelso said, "but living in Minneapolis. resolution could be published cants to be heard, Sonnen cast the we're concerned about overall The boys said Danforth took lay and be effective July 1. only vote against suspending the noise energy." nude photos ff c rs of who searched said .cause the issue was not on rules. But she added she is "100 So far, none of the airlines has police officers who searched Dan - ,enda, a unanimous vote was percent" in favor of Weida. signed noise agreements, but An- forth's apartment at 441 Lynnhurst derson hopes to have signed con- Ave. did not recover the photos. — tracts in t contract tr by Friday. The most y may ax some free parking significant contract would be with Northwest Airlines because it gen- { St. Paul City Council is con - day parking. erates 80 percent of the flights. CORRECTION ! g a hefty cut in the number General locations of the all -day • The contracts are not enforce - parking spaces near down- meters include 12th Street just able, and Northwest vice president An article in the Tuesday Pio- north of I -94 extending from Cedar for operations Ben Griggs has said neer Press Dispatch misspelled the oposal to add 286 new park- Street on the west to University that the number of flights will fol- last name of Sgt. Richard Dreger :tens north of Interstate 94 Avenue east of St. Paul- Ramsey low market demands. of the Maplewood Police Depa-t- receive final a royal Tues- Medical Center, short portions of ment. The article was on a PP Anderson said the contracts will ut the council delayed the Jackson, Robert, 14th and 13th. have to be negotiated every year tested for exposure to the AIDS ..- study the length of time streets just west of the medical because of changing market de- rut after a judge issued a search in be allowed on meters center, and the south side of Auro- mands, and the best enforcement warrant allowing health workers 3thesda Hospital. ra Avenue just north of the Sears will be the noise budget. to take a blood sample. store. ±r time will range from one Shorter -term meters are pro- hours, and the hourly rate posed for Park Street and Sher- • crease from 20 cents to 75 burne Avenue near Bethesda Hos- Higher- priced and shorter- pital, the north side of University , ,f ki I l 3 ' i . , , ; x meters will be placed in Avenue between Rice and Park t .x ° / . .'4. - / • vhere a fast turnover is de- streets and the north side of Auro- 3 * r .. ` r . Aber meters will be for all- ra Avenue near Sears. ^ ' ' r+ 1 ' E .--_-_-_-____— N ,,,,, : -„,..„ ..„ i , qt JODITIOER t t u34 �. # 8 i e 4 LOWOUT ' ti a MIMI EMI NUM 1 VOLT AMP MOW EER MTN KC MON rtm uuain f0 115 6.0 20" 9.0 279" 25" OUR SPRING 30 115 10.5 24" 9.0 389" 30" AND SUMMER STOCK! 30 115 12.0 26" 10.0 519" 40" Because you deserve it, the best selection of our Spring and Summer fashions...all at 1/3 off the regular price. 30 230 11.0 26" 9.0 549" 50°° Save on suits, dresses, sportswear and more. 30 . 230 16.3 27 " 8.3 819 -0- 1 �» y � ; x , /\ : NancyLawence ix" ` • ( \ v ,� fine apparel sues 16 to 16 TT_ ,..t, ! r' 3 L Since 1922 E .. R , ek �` , :'. 50th France, Edina, 9'?Fi J3(h Pavilion Place, Roseville, fi31 lil'Z 90 DAYS ID, On the walhlval, next to T.C.F. • Corner 01'132 and Snelling East University at 35E 224314M • I,,rnr s 11 /I 1 „ „ MAC hails airline ac p is as big step to cut noise By Laurie Blake Paul International Airport. • Staff Writer Jan Del Calzo, the Minneapolis rep - Negotiated agreements with airlines resentative on the commission, cast offering up to $500,000 for sound the sole vote against the agreements. insulation of two elementary schools She said the welcome 13- percent and a 13- percent reduction in airport noise reduction "could turn to ashes noise from peak levels of last August in a couple of months" because the were approved Friday by the Metro- commission accepted voluntary politan Airports Commission. agreements with the airlines instead of imposing noise restrictions The commission described the agree- through an ordinance. She added, "It ments, which are effective immedi- simply doesn't guarantee anything." ately, as an industry-wide break- through and proclaimed them a ma- Seven of the largest air carriers at the jor step toward solving the noise problem around the Minneapolis -St. Noise continued on page 10A • 1 c. /, . 1fL0,w . • Saturday /June 27 /1987 /Minneapolis Star and Tribune N agreem On the hr hand, Hig said, " ent. We don't want ot e to kill the whole agreement with some very Continued from page IA of Northwest . tough language on that, so what were saying is that when that occurs, we airport were asked to give a written want our day in court to talk about noise act commitment to staged reduction of it." noise from August 1986 levels, start- Northwest Airlines agreed to: doe d Northwest sai sai est s not mind n fog with an 11- percent reduction this He a all of est d o e se not m ind year and ending with a 24- percent • Use its best efforts, oonsis- providing reduction by 1992. tent with marketing and oper- this year on the expectation that oth- ational requirements, to re- er airlines will be in a better position 7'�ie airlines were asked to accom- duce flights or increase its to contribute in the future. p)ish the reductions through the use use of less -noisy aircraft so Griggs denied that the 13- percent re- of quieter jets, noise - cutting takeoff as to reduce its average gg techniques, restricted use of the air- noise impact from August duction Northwest achieved this year • pprt at night and, if necessary, the 1986 levels by 11 percent by is entirely due to its merger with elimination of flights. They also were July 1, 1987. Annual incre- - Republic Airlines. He said Northwest asked to agree to contribute up to ments would be added so the is carrying more passengers this sum - $500,000 for the sound insulation of reduction would reach 24 per- mer than both airlines did together • • dentennial Elementary School, 7315 cent by July 1, 1992. last summer. He said Northwest is • • Bloomington Av. S., Richfield, and achieving the noise reductions Wenonah School, 5625 23rd Av. S., • Try to limit nighttime aCtivi- through more efficient scheduling Minneapolis. ty to current levels and when- that takes noise concerns into consid- . .;.r ever possible to use quieter eration. , Fourt the seven airlines submitted jets at night. Nighttime hours fc u L agreements to work toward are 11 p.m. to 6 a.m. Monday To the criticism from noise -weary ttlesc'goals. The other three refused through Friday; 11 p.m. to 7 residents and their elected officials • such ?a firm commitment but submit- a.m. Saturday and Sunday in that the negotiated agreements do uia'letters expressing general cooper- 1987 and 11 p.m. to 8 a.m. not offer airport neighbors sure noise able, on the issue. Saturday and Sunday after relief, not Greenwood to said the c o m any «:a 1987. QA(yl Twin Cities -based Northwest violations. A,jj4i s specifically agreed to try to . • Accelerate flight -crew train - keep: up its efforts to reduce noise ing programs designed tore- Records of airline noise levels sup- . 41414992. Northwest, which pro- duce noise impact. plied by the airlines will be published vtde;r 0 percent of the air service at each month in advertisements in lo- the' carport, is credited with providing • Participate in negotiations cal newspapers during summer and a(C4the noise reductions this sum- with the commission and oth- other "open- window' times of the mer:-,-1 er carriers to discuss the es- year when airport noise is most no- tablishment of landing tees uceable, Greenwood said. I'{tC commission was about based on noise. taapprove both the formal and infor- What will happen if the airlines vio- n al' agreements from the seven air- • Provide monthly informa- late their agreements is not clear. lines , when Walter Rockenstein, tion on scheduled and actual clitiirrnan of the Metropolitan Air- utilization of aircraft by air- Greenwood and Commissioner Bar- . Per and Abatement Council, con- craft type. bara Ashley have said they will vote • vincet the commissioners that such to enact a noise ordinance regulating approval would be unfair to the four the airlines if the agreements fail. *brigs that had made the stronger Northwest also said in its agreement commitments. that if one or more other airlines fail But Del Calzo said, "As I read Hal _ t to achieve noise reductions similar to Greenwood's commitment on that, it AX:,fi;ockenstein's request, the com- Northwest's, then it reserves the right is to hold a vote on implementing the mission approved the agreements to fly more jets. ordinance. I wouldn't take any bets frgni:Dlorthwest, Delta, Midway and on how the commission would vote." Continental airlines and asked its "It is not the intent of this agreement staff. to continue to seek the same to have Northwest voluntarily reduce Commissioner Tim Lovaasen, for tyke; of agreement from United, or alter its activity and noise genera - one, said emphatically yesterday that A, and Trans World airlines. tion in order to permit or make it he would not vote for a noise ordi- possible for other carriers to generate nance. CAmniission Chairman Hal Green- additional noise at MSP (the arr- wooi°predicted that the agreements port)," the Northwest commitment Del Calzo said noise -weary residents would.serve as a national model. He said. will be watching the charts carefully said:l!);at voluntary, rather than man- for violations. "You can bet that the dgted,;.noise reductions are best for Griggs said that is an important point first time it goes above that line well commerce and safety and, in the long to Northwest because the airline does be there and I'm going to say 'I told r4i3, • {Lest for resolving the noise prob- not want to lose business to competi- you so.' " tem ,w tors because it is abiding by its noise Bpi Griggs, Northwest's executive vtee.president of operations, said yes- terday, "We spent a lot of long hours tryipg to get something out there that showed we cared, and I'm pleased that.1he commission accepted the ef- forts-as being fruitful. "W pie got to keep flying and we've • got}o :keep providing jobs, but we are coV,uiiant of the noise problem and wa'j tip our bit." • G 1ij' said, however, "We can't p 1* anything. There are a lot of- situations that can happen that can nt j4&li difficult or easier (for North - w• . to meet its noise goal). But it's ttwra.because it's our intention to aitytiys keep this in mind as we devel- . otsehedules and analyze traffic." • Si Hof the seven airlines said their ' . agreements would be subject to can- cellation with 30 days' notice. In its letter,', Continental simply reserved Iri• . • its right to withdraw front any under - • t■l:ing• w C p 7 ° O C o E ' '.. LW • 't o - b T a O U c , C C r r < R C Q E C, 3 is >. 0. E o E ` t 0 o 8 ° ; t y ' E a¢ a ° o -. ° 3 3 c S -o ...� N , E c. o > .. b E _ h' E o. W a o 0 6 u o m c a m L � . 0 C °- J 3 c ❑ a E ..,-&-"z.,''.--2'=7,3 t ao ILI • 0 0? =' 02 ` Z. c • c a v E o W a.°a$Rcm'TrE S - �. a W -c° tiom °o . . i �' a a C g. 'O v oL u 5 y O ' . E c E Q c 5 ° c a c ° ° a o '° G� -:-..-f.2.40%'4:',' • H C u ti C E `'3 A C E m °d . E c n ° 3 0 � ° o � a S J W 8 c 0 'Ct z m fa G—G C �O .. •. O E a c4 a ° L c 1 0 . � Q az . oa a tE -i N . ` -_ " , - o - ° a ^'°. C oL S OEvi v sU W o O .. ry °zB t-,112. H � .- c ° - ° Q y ° c 3 ° ° c 2 ' a m o f ° . a c ;c E g a� p °. ‘, ,?„-',5 ?i It -` y ti, � `m m O 3 ° in ` ' O `1 ,, 3 v 6.1 lid ga35 Z - b6.° Zi • ¢ - S m KZ QiSci . c b�Y ado o c E 3 o L .E � g -= 0 '3 cr. '. L a • c p a g _'_� °. 5 f3 o. "ti � ' N a 3 ° c ems` e �� — O b .= •O n_71.& ai •• L . W C. ; v ca o E 3 e ''. C F E. I h I 1 ! : I u I1 N _ a �` L O . c `' E C a T �" '° O C !� `. 4 0 E HX a �o k • T W .. N E „ C E v O ai V C O _ `� _ • a > c° ° a s c ,,,...0 a' E.- F�. a ?' E- > Q E-..d Z:i - .E H a v a _ a L - a - a .0 b 3 3 c • c F o cl o *p a T g•-2. a a E E H a $ E E' o o c 8 L c° o i s a.`. F,, cV E. CC. E a_E'C 8 R N[ L _ -.F., . b . a N 0. a 8 t `. tN C ,-{ o s c o o a E y $ y E E -o tb ° c _ o 8' E Y � . o E” o o.c • 5io 'o E' va.o -ao a -, , on 4 a C c .a 5 o a u 3 = E E V o b t7 � C h E. v p m- C c n c bE . i. • 6 u . t ` " C o a - a a' °' o o p 3 c . • C C . p, E -. .-. O C � a E C cd a p� 7 _a_.,. d _ O, • O ... a E O W 7 u u - g -2 E 3 a = a _ a' "' °.t o a >- :� a `� c v .c E �> v v a ` , o c 2 . p a .E. E " '0 3 ° c .0 H 0 a a ^` - . C a a a 1 4 -, j W u) F Q , . WATCH FOR .., THESE PLANES ,.. 1 72 7 Passenger Capacity: 100 -146 Empty Weight (lbs) : 90,800 - 100,400 Max. Weight (take -off): 16 1,000- 201,500 •• Length: 133' -153' Height: 34' Wing Span: 108' Range (miles) : 1,740-2,300 j .• Cruise Speed: 542 -599 .. •- • .im � :'r ' .. • 737 Passenger Capacity: 109 -130 Empty Weight (lbs): 61,630 - • . s . . - Max. Weight (take -off): 128,100 • Length: 100' Height: 34' Wing Span: 93' ' • R n /1111/1 ''"'"•` • Range (miles): 2,136 f = -. ��,,{{ Cruise or— Speed- 530h 747 Passenger Capacity: 394 -500 qty height (lbs): 363,500 - 382,000 Max. eight (take -off): 73 4,000- 833,000 �� < i Length: 231' '� f 1) :1 Height:.64' '! 'ing Span: 196' Lange (miles).:- 5,540 -6,563 s ...go,' a�y>. •• Cruise Speed: 555 -602 mph l 1 i ` enlel . i - 757 C .' _ __- Passenger Capacity: 186 -224 t - J y Might (lbs): 130,420 Max. Might -(take -off): 220.000 Length: 155' -' raw LMlwrOusaarro . .., Welg 45' _ � ing Span: 125' ' ��:` • 1 : Range (miles) : 2,383 fq DC9 Ask Passenger Capacity: 90 - 172 i � y Empty Weight (lbs): 61,880 - 79,757 Max. weight (take -off): 121,000 - 140,000 - �__ Length: 133' -147' �T height: 28' -29'8" Wing Span: 93'5n-107'10" aErsoIIIIIIOIIIIIIIIIN 111 1111111111118 ---40 • Range (miles) : 2,065 - 3,060 •: ;. t: Cruise Speed: 510 -575 mph DC 10 )) Passenger Capacity: 289 -380 �� -� Empty Weight (lbs) : 268,000 •� „• . , �/ Max. Weight (take -off) : 580,000 40 �� Length: 182' -` — � Height: 58' l a�,1w Wing Span: 165' • nnmmnn • nnnminimen g i4nimmun•tn of n.. Range . (miles ) : 5.370 _ �� �y Cruise Speed: 560 mph CONVAIR CV -580 Passenger Capacity: 56. . - � ' Empty Weight (lbs) : 30,275 , Max. Weight (take -off) : 57,000 __i't__ x Length: 81'6” Height: 28'2" Wing Span: 105'4" ...? ( : 000Ci` h Range (riles) : 1,230 �� ,--i. M - T! Cruise Speed: 300 mph .b BEECH COMMUTER 99 w 71_ ( ;` ,K - Pa ssenger Capacity: 15 � weight (lbs) : 6,495 Max. ' Weight (take -off) : 11,300 Length: 44'6" : ; _ Height: 14' 4 ' I .�1•C 0, ' = Wing Span: 45' 10" t. • nle, ,_ - LUI i- Range (miles): 1,048 1 1_0 Cruise Speed: 287 mph - PARTS Each part of the airplane has a name. The body of the plane is called the FUSELAGE. of th e SEL The front of the airplane is called the NOSE. Ai RpriA : E The COCKPIT is at the front of the airplane. :.:: This is where the controls and instruments are located. The pilot, co-pilot , and the flight engineer sit in the cockpit when they 1. FUSELAGE are flying the airplane. 2. NOSE The rear of the airplane is called the TAIL. 3. COCKPIT 4. VERTICAL STABILIZER The VERTICAL STABILIZER is the section of • 5. RUDDER the tail that sticks up in the air. 6. HORIZONTAL STABILIZER The RLDDER is on the vertical stabilizer. 7. ELEVATOR When the rudder roves, the airplane goes 8. WING to the right or left. 9. LEADING EDGE 10 TRAILING EDGE The HORIZONTAL STABILIZER is the section 11. FLAP of the tail that sticks out to the sides. 12. AILERON The ELEVATOR is on the horizontal stabilizer. 13. LANDING GEAR When the elevator moves, the airplane goes up or down. Q ID 9 © 1 The WINGS of the airplane are designed and shaped to provide LIFT. Lift is an upward i force caused by air rushing over the wings. This supports the airplane when it is in flight. n l e The front / edge of the wing is called the L X,E LEADING EZ_ � . The rear edge of the wing is called the ��' ' / - TRAILING EDGE. , The FLAPS are hinged sections on the wings. They can be moved to help increase lift at slower air speeds_ The AILERONS are also hinged sections on , the trailing edge of the wings. By moving )/ \ r the ailerons, the airplane can bank into turns. The LANDING GEAR are under the airplane. They support the airplane when it is on _ - 6 the ground. In most airplanes, the gear - folds inside the airplane when it is in • the air so it can go faster. Gear that folds inside is called RETRACTABLE. Gear that does not retract is called FI?®. 4 0 0 0 ' 0 1111 111.11.116.— ' 1 1101111110 Ilia,- O'a 13 21.