HomeMy WebLinkAbout06/20/2002 - Waste Reduction and Recycling Advisory Commission Page 1 of 9
•
Joanna Foote
From: Joanna Foote
Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2002 10:39 AM
To: Nathan Krahn (nok @mccollumlaw.com); Linda Merkel (dakotamn @pro - ns.net)
Subject: June 20 packet - -no attachments •
Let me know if this works better. Thanks, Joanna
AGENDA
WASTE REDUCTION & RECYCLING
ADVISORY COMMISSION
EAGAN, MINNESOTA
Eagan Municipal Center
City Council Chambers
Thursday, June 20, 2002
5:30 p.m.
I. ROLL CALL AND ADOPTION OF AGENDA (5:30 -5:32) •
IL APPROVE APRIL 18, 2002 MEETING MINUTES (5:32 -5:35)
Review May 30 Meeting notes.
III. VISITORS TO BE HEARD
IV. OLD BUSINESS
A. Review & Adopt proposed Ordinance 6.37 Revision (5:35 -6:45)
V. NEW BUSINESS
B. Recycling Coordinator Updates (6:45 -6:59)
VII. ADJOURNMENT Next meeting- To be determined. (7:00)
(, ."SC get/
6/20/2002
Page 2 of 9
The mission
The mission of the Waste Reduction and
Recycling Advisory Commission is to
proactively assist the Eagan City Council
by educating, encouraging and assisting
the community in reducing and managing
waste in an environmentally sound
manner.
MEMO TO: MEMBERS OF THE EAGAN WASTE REDUCTION & RECYCLING
ADVISORY COMMISSION
FROM: COMMUNICATIONS COORDINATOR FOOTE
DATE: June 10, 2002
SUBJECT: ADVISORY COMMISSION MEETING OF JUNE 20, 2002
A regular meeting of the Eagan Waste Reduction & Recycling Commission will be held on
Thursday June 20, 2002 from 5:30 p.m. until 7:00 p.m., in the Council Chambers at City Hall.
Please contact Joanna Foote at (651) 681 -4604 by Tuesday, June 18, to indicate if you
cannot attend.
I. ROLL CALL AND ADOPTION OF AGENDA
6/20/2002
Page 3 of 9
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: approve, deny or modify
agenda
II. APPROVAL OF April 18, 2002 MEETING MINUTES
A copy of the minutes of the Waste Reduction Commission meeting of April 18, 2002 is
included as an attachment.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: approve, deny or modify April
18, 2002 minutes.
REVIEW MEETING NOTES OF MAY 30, 2002
III. VISITORS TO BE HEARD
IV. OLD BUSINESS
A. Discussion Regarding Ordinance Revision (5:55 -6:15)
• FACTS: At its February, March, April and May* meetings the Commission
discussed Ordinance Section 6.37 and suggested revisions and adopted suggested
modifications for portions of the ordinance section. Staff has been working with the
City Attorney to amend certain portions of the ordinance as and discussed by the
Commission. A third draft containing the revisions discussed at the April meeting is
attached and/or included.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THESE ITEMS: Discussion and Adoption of
revisions to ordinance section 6.37.
V. NEW BUSINESS
B. Recycling Coordinator Updates. (6:55 -6:59)
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THESE ITEMS: none
VI. ADJOURNMENT Next Meeting: To be determined.
MINUTES OF THE WASTE REDUCTION & RECYCLING ADVISORY COMMISSION
Eagan, Minnesota
April 18, 2002
A regular meeting of the Eagan Waste Reduction & Recycling Advisory Commission was held on
Thursday, April 18, 2002 at 5:30 p.m. in the Council Chambers at the Eagan Municipal Center. Present were:
Rick Patraw, John Tapper, Nathan Krahn, Linda Merkel, Kari Sammon, Ron Moening, Clint Hooppaw, Carla
Heyl, Doug Link, and Gary Hansen. Also present were Recycling Coordinator Sue Bast, Communications
Coordinator Joanna Foote, City Attorney Sharon Hills, and the new Environmental Technician Tara Roffler.
APPROVAL OF AGENDA
Foote distributed correspondence between Armor Waste Systems and City
6/20/2002
Page 4 of 9
staff related to the ordinance revision. Tapper moved to approve the April 18,
2002 agenda as amended. Hansen seconded the motion with all members
voting in favor.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Krahn made a motion to approve the minutes of the March 21, 2002 WRAC
meeting as presented. Hooppaw seconded the motion with all members voting
in favor.
VISITORS TO BE HEARD •
Hjermstad of Armor Waste Systems presented remedies for ordinance 6.37
(Sections 1 & 2 only) as an alternative to what was presented at the last
meeting.
OLD BUSINESS
A. Review Proposed Ordinance 6.37 Revision
Foote outlined 5 areas (some of which have been addressed in the second draft)
that the Commission may wish to consider for discussion:
• The current cap on the number of residential haulers;
• Any further changes the Commission may wish to consider to the licensing categories;
• Any changes the Commission may wish to consider related to ownership /operational changes
(i.e. what happens to a company's license if ownership changes or company ceases to exist,
etc.);
• Any changes the Commission may wish to consider related to loss of license due to non -use;
• Provisions for ensuring and monitoring usage of license.
Chair Patraw invited Harry Hjermstad of Armor Waste Systems to address the
hauler's proposed changes to ordinance section 6.37, sections 1 and 2 only.
Refer to handout for specifics.
In addressing the ordinance revisions, Foote suggested starting at the top and
moving through each section of the ordinance in order.
Section 1. D. Targeted recyclables
Foote said that there does not appear to be an issue with Targeted recyclables
section.
Section 1. F. Single family /multiple dwelling - individual household service
hauling
Foote referred to copies of the State statute, which was requested by the
Commission at the last meeting. The City's solid waste categories were
primarily derived from the State statue, defines "Commercial generator" and
"Residential generator."
Foote reminded the Commission that its previous revisions to the City's solid
6/20/2002
Page 5 of 9
waste ordinance attempted to emulate the State statute by defining a residential
generator as a household that has individual service and is billed
independently. Heyl stated that the City's ordinance in defining a townhome
association is actually contrary to the State statute, which considers residents
who are not billed separately, but also indicated that the City Ordinance made
sense in its definition. Foote agreed that the City's ordinance is a hybrid of the
State statute. Heyl stated that Section 1.F & G makes sense as they are stated
and while Armor may feel excluded, the Commission should not change the
ordinance. Hooppaw motioned to adopt Section 1;D, F, G, and J as written
in the packet. Heyl seconded the motion with all members voting in favor.
Heyl made a motion to adopt Section 2 as written in the handout.
Hooppaw seconded the motion. Hansen questioned the date in Section
2.A.3. Hills said it was left as is because it was in the original ordinance. The
necessity of the date in Section 2.A.5 was also questioned. The Commission
unanimously voted for a friendly amendment to delete the date in both
sections.
The Commission then addressed Section 3.0 and Section 4.J, the "use or lose
it clause ". Hills said that language was added at the end of Section 3.0 to
make clear the difference between name change and change of ownership. All
licenses in Eagan require termination if it is a change in ownership. If it is
simply a name change, then termination is not required (i.e. a merger, an
acquisition, or purchase of assets). Foote explained that the City does this
because it needs to know who operates the business. However, a name change
does not require termination. Hjermstad brought to the Commission's
attention that when Allied purchased BFI and USA Waste purchased Waste
Management, the license was not terminated. Foote said it is the hauler's
responsibility to notify staff of any ownership changes. This was apparently not
done. The point is now irrelevant, however, as both companies have since been
re- licensed.
Tapper left the meeting at 6:15 p.m.
Heyl recommended that the cap be on a first come, first serve basis, and
haulers should know that they need to reapply for a license when ownership
changes. In addressing Section 4.J, Heyl said that the City would want neither
a monopoly or just two haulers nor a flood of 20 haulers on Eagan streets. She
suggests that the cap be kept to 7 actively licensed haulers and that the
Commission should determine the percentage of residential household service
needed for a hauler to obtain licensure with the City. Foote stated that no
waiting list has been kept, but staff is working with the City attorney to
•
determine if there should be one. Chair Patraw stated that the initial reason for
the cap was to address the issue of a high volume of truck traffic in Eagan. At
that time, there were quite a few waste hauling companies but that is not the
case right now. He also indicated that Section 4.J may be really difficult to
manage. Hansen suggested that the Commission specify a certain minimum
number of households rather than a percentage because it would be much
simpler to administer.
6/20/2002
Page 6 of 9
In answer to a question regarding the ability of a hauler to secure the license of
a company upon the purchase of that company, Foote said that there is no
provision that would guarantee a new owner a license if it takes over a
previously licensed company. Heyl made a motion that the City attorney
draft language that the new owner is "preferred" in this type of transfer
over those on a waiting list and that the percentage in Section 4.J be
changed to a set number of households. The Commission discussed these
changes. Hjermstad suggested that the ordinance also require haulers to
provide service in all three hauling districts. Foote indicated that the
requirement of all three districts might favor the large haulers because the
smaller ones may not have enough staff or equipment to provide service in all
three districts, but that two districts might be appropriate. Hooppaw seconded
the motion as stated and agreed that the issue of requiring a specific number
of hauling districts, be discussed further at the next meeting. The Commission
unanimously approved motion.
Foote said that a third draft of the ordinance will be prepared by the Attorney
and will be provided to the Commission at the next meeting.
NEW BUSINESS
A. Adopt 2002 Commission Meeting Schedule and Work plan
The group discussed the items and timeframes included with the proposed
workplan. The date of the final ordinance adoption is not certain at this point,
but hopefully can be concluded by the May or June meeting and therefore will
be planned through the June meeting.
The Commission generally takes the month of July off and would like to do so
again this year. The Commission discussed the possibility of securing the
recycling mobile for the Fourth of July Parade and Celebration. Bast informed
the group that the Office of Environmental Assistance no longer has a budget
to provide driving service, so someone will have to volunteer for that duty.
Patraw agreed to look into the options as he works for the OEA.
The Green Building discussion was moved to June and the Electronic
Recycling discussion to August. Moening offered to provide the group with a
tour of the Waste Management recycling facility in Minneapolis during the
September meeting. The field trip could be the Commission's celebration of
the ordinance adoption and its last meeting. Hooppaw moved to adopt the
meeting schedule and goals. Heyl seconded the motion with all members
voting in favor.
B. Recycling Coordinator Updates
Bast updated the group on the new recycling guides that were developed at the
request the code enforcement staff. They have information about how to file a
complaint if someone leaves an appliance or other items outside. She also
mentioned the City tree sale Saturday, April 27 and Eagan "Healthy
Community Initiative" resident open house on May 18 from 10a.m. to 2p.m.
Bast will not be there, but she asked if someone would like to volunteer for the
6/20/2002
Page 7 of 9
event. There will be informational packets put together for it.
ADJOURNMENT
Moening made a motion to adjourn the meeting at 7:20 p.m. Heyl
seconded with all members voting in favor.
Date Secretary
MEETING NOTES FOR THE WASTE REDUCTION & RECYCLING ADVISORY
COMMISSION
•
Eagan, Minnesota
May 30, 2002
The Eagan Waste Reduction & Recycling Advisory Commission did not have a quorum for the
•
meeting scheduled on Thursday, May 30, 2002. However, a discussion was held at 5:30 in the Council
•
Chambers at the Eagan Municipal Center. Present were: Gary Hansen, Clint Hooppaw, Ron Moening and
John Tapper. Also present were Recycling Coordinator Sue Bast, Communications Coordinator Joanna
Foote, and Environmental Technician Tara Roffler.
RECYCLING COORDINATOR UPDATES
Bast showed the group the new Cascade Bay sign for its chairs and tables made out of
recycled plastic. The sign was made by Bedford Technologies (Worthington, Minnesota) from
recycled plastic milk jugs. Bast said that the material is very durable and economical. Tapper
mentioned that a sign like that would be great for the Dakota County Eco -Site.
Bast is working on a tri-fold brochure on last year's residential paper recycling pilot project.
It should be ready for distribution some time next month.
DISCUSSION OF MINUTES
Hansen and Hooppaw pointed out a few typos in the minutes of the April 18, 2002 WRAC meeting.
Revisions will be made and a new draft will be presented to the Commission members for the June meeting.
OLD BUSINESS
A. Review Proposed Ordinance 6.37 Revision
Acting Chair Hooppaw suggested that the Commission informally address sections 3 and 4, which
were not approved during the previous meeting. He first invited Harry Hjermstad of Armor Waste Systems to
voice his concerns. Hjermstad asked how the Sioux Falls residential hauling article (provided by Hansen and
distributed to the group by Foote) related to the revision of Eagan's Ordinance 6.37. Foote said that it was
provided to the group simply as an item of interest. Hjermstad again mentioned the fact that some haulers did
not follow proper procedure when ownership changes occurres. He wanted to know if the Commission will
6/20/2002
Page 9 of 9
entirely. He mentioned that the City of Burnsville has not had a licensing cap in several years and it has not
been an issue. Burnsville only has 5 licensed haulers. The group discussed Krahn's suggestions and
determined that this idea had already been sufficiently considered and dismissed.
Tapper proposed that Section J require haulers to service at least 250 residential households in the
City, using their own equipment, and that the licensee provide the City a list of all Eagan service accounts on
an annual basis, rather than quarterly. Moening proposed that this section just state that haulers must serve a
minimum of 250 residential households in the City, which is subject to inspection by City staff. They could
do spot checks on use of a hauler's license anytime during the year. The members present were in general
agreement with Moening. They also felt that the ordinance should not address subcontracting.
NEW BUSINESS
The groups expects that the hauling ordinance will be adopted at the next meeting on June 20 Foote
may not be present but Bast and Roffler will provide guidance.
Tapper announced that the Dakota County Eco -Site intends to begin collection of all electronics on
July 1 This is a much needed service for the community and expands the Eco -Site as a "one stop" drop -off.
They will have to charge fees because the electronics collection will not be subsidized by Dakota County.
Tapper expects the fee to be somewhere above 25 cents /lbs.
ADJOURNMENT
The discussion adjourned at 6:50 p.m.
6/20/2002
Sec. 6.37. Garbage, refuse and recycling haulers.
Subd. 1. Definitions. The following terms, as used in this section, shall have the
meanings stated:
A. Garbage means all putrescible wastes, including animal offal and carcasses of dead
animals but excluding human excreta, sewage and other water - carried wastes.
B. Other refuse means ashes, nonrecyclable glass, crockery, cans, paper, boxes, rags and
similar nonputrescible wastes (does not decay or have foul odor), and construction or demolition
debris, excluding sand, earth, brick, stone and concrete, and trees, tree branches and wood except
when stored as firewood.
C. Recyclables means materials that are separated from mixed municipal solid waste for the
purpose of recycling, including paper, glass, plastics, metals, automobile oil, and batteries.
Refuse - derived fuel or other material that is destroyed by incineration is not a recyclable
material.
D. Targeted recyclables means metal food and beverage containers, glass food and beverage
containers, newsprint, corrugated cardboard, plastics (as defined by the county), office type
paper and mail, magazines,* catalogs* or other materials as defined by council resolution.
*Note -- Effective January 1, 1992.
*Note -- Effective January 1, 1992.
E. Yard waste means leaves, lawn clippings, garden waste, weeds, Christmas trees and
prunings up to six inches in diameter or other materials as may be defined by council resolution.
F. Residential dwelling hauling means garbage, refuse and recycling hauling services in
which the hauler specifically services an individual residential dwelling unit for the pickup of the
garbage, refuse or recyclables of that individual residential dwelling unit at that specific unit,
regardless of whether it is a single - family dwelling or a dwelling unit within a multiple dwelling
unit structure.
G. Commercial/multiple dwelling hauling means garbage, refuse or recycling hauling
services provided to any commercial establishment or any multiple dwelling units of which all
residents commingle their garbage and refuse in a dumpster or other similar container for shared
pickup service by the hauler or commingle their recyclables in a dumpster or other similar
container for shared pickup service by the hauler.
A. Hauler licenses shall be granted only upon the condition that the licensee has watertight
packer -type vehicles or, in the case of recycling and construction or demolition debris haulers,
appropriate container vehicles in condition to prevent loss in transit of liquid or solid cargo; that
the vehicle be kept clean and as free from offensive odors as possible; and the vehicle not be
parked in any street longer than reasonably necessary to collect garbage, other refuse, yard waste
or recyclables. All vehicles shall be in full compliance of the Minnesota Department of
Transportation requirements. The Applicant shall make all vehicles available for inspection by
the City.
1. There shall be four license categories defined by the type of account served: (1)
commercial /multiple dwelling, (2) residential dwelling, (3) residential/multiple dwelling
recycling. and ( ?) (I thought these had been redefined in about 1996) (4) construction and
demolition debris.
2. Commercial/multiple dwelling and residential dwelling hauling licenses include
residential recycling licenses.
(a) Residential recycling licensees may only collect recyclables as defined herein.
3. Residential dwelling hauling licensees shall make curbside recycling collection
available to all residential dwelling accounts. Commercial/multiple - dwelling hauling licensees
shall make recycling collection available to all multiple residential dwelling accounts. At a
minimum, such service shall include all targeted recyclables as defined herein.
Commercial/multiple - dwelling hauling licensees shall make recycling collection available to all
commercial establishment accounts no later than January 1, 1993. At a minimum, such service to
commercial establishments shall include at least two targeted recyclables items as defined herein.
4. Residential dwelling hauling licensees shall make weekly collection of separated
garbage and other refuse, yard waste and recyclables for all residential dwelling accounts within
the daily hauling districts as defined by council action.
(a) It is unlawful for refuse vehicles to operate on residential streets in such districts
on any other day, except to collect a missed pickup, special pickup or when an observed holiday
falls within that week.
5. At a minimum, commercial/multiple dwelling hauling licensees shall make weekly
collections of separated garbage, other refuse and recyclables for all multiple residential dwelling
accounts no later than October 1, 1990.
6. It shall be the responsibility of the licensee that the name and telephone number of the
owner of any and all containers which are located on and hauled off a construction or demolition
site by the licensee be permanently affixed to each such container.
B. Before In order to receive or obtain or retain a garbage, other refuse or recycling hauline
license shall be issued, the applicant shall be in compliance with all state, county and city
regulations or ordinances, including any conditional use permits.
tonnage, with the exception that yard waste may be reported in estimates of cubic yardage
abated. Failure to certify accurate volumes in a timely manner may be cause for revocation of the
hauling license.
Subd. 5. Mixed municipal solid waste and recycling transfer station. It is unlawful for
any person to operate or to permit another to operate a mixed municipal solid waste and
recycling transfer station without a license or permit required therefor by Dakota County and the
State of Minnesota -- Minnesota Pollution Control Agency. It is unlawful for any person to
operate or to permit another to operate a mixed municipal solid waste and recycling transfer
station within the city in violation of any term or condition of a license or permit required
therefor by Dakota County and the State of Minnesota -- Minnesota Pollution Control Agency.
Prior to the operation of a mixed municipal solid waste and recycling transfer station, the
operator shall provide a copy of the license or permit issued by the county or state. The current
license or permit shall be posted in a conspicuous location in the transfer station.
(Code 1983, § 6.37, eff. 1 -1 -83; Ord. No. 93, 2nd series, eff. 12- 15 -90; Ord. No. 130, 2nd series,
eff. 11- 29 -91; Ord. No. 136, 2nd series, eff. 5- 15 -92; Ord. No. 192, 2nd series, eff. 1- 12 -95;
Ord. No. 210, 2nd series, eff. 2 -8 -96; Ord. No. 213, 2nd series, eff. 3- 14 -96; Ord. No. 218, 2nd
series, eff. 5 -2 -96; Ord. No. 222, 2nd series, eff. 9- 12 -96; Ord. No. 254, 2nd series, eff. 1- 29 -98;
Ord. No. 274, 2nd series, eff. 4- 29 -99; Ord. No. 277, 2nd series, eff. 6 -1 -99)