Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout10/10/1989 - Solid Waste Abatement Commission MEMO TO: CHAIRS MANN AND HOEL AND ALL MEMBERS OF THE SOLID WASTE ABATEMENT COMMISSION FROM: RECYCLING SPECIALIST HAGEMAN DATE: OCTOBER 3, 1989 SUBJECT: EAGAN SOLID WASTE ABATEMENT COMMISSION MEETING OF OCTOBER 10, 1989 A regular meeting of the Eagan Solid Waste Abatement Commission will be held on Tuesday, October 10, 1989 at 11:30 a.m. at the Eagan Municipal Center, Conference Rooms A and B. The City will provide a box lunch to Commission members requesting one by noon, Monday, October 9. Please call to indicate if you will attend and your luncheon preference. Please contact by phone Kris Hageman or Jane Helebrant at 454 -8100. I. ROLL CALL AND ADOPTION OF AGENDA The agenda, as presented or modified, requires adoption by the Commission. �, :O ( �_� ' II. APPROVAL F MINUTES 0 , �¢ The minutes of the olid aste Abatement Commission meeting of September 12, 1989 are enclosed on pages 4L through 6 for your review. These minutes, subject to any change, require approval by the Commission. III. STAFF REPORT A. Commercial Recycling Program - Dakota County As of August 1, 1989, the Dakota County Recycling Collection Center accepts low grade office papers from commercial haulers and residents. The County has designed a basic implementation plan and will distribute the packet to interested parties. The program is geared toward small business, those that will not generate large amounts of waste each month but it will also work for large companies as well. The program lists recycling firms that offer pick up services but also envisions the residential and commercial refuse haulers playing an important role in the program. The County at this time is not paying for the materials brought in to the RCC. B. Multi - Family Recycling Work Plan We have outlined the basic issues to be worked on for implementing the multi - family program in Eagan. The following is a time line we hope to follow in the next few months to facilitate a smooth continuation of the multi - family program into 1990. 1. The licensing requirements are up for renewal January 1, 1990. We will work to have all ordinance revisions completed for the start of this renewal period. 2. For the November SWAC meeting: a. Draft ordinance modifications for requiring recycling services for multi - family solid waste contracts. b. Draft ordinance modifications concerning scavenging in multi - family units. 3. We are currently working with refuse haulers to facilitate a new performance funding agreement. We will have some numbers ll available at the October 10 meeting. C` v `, % From these drafts any approved amendments will then proceed to the O 1/ • Eagan City Council for approval through the month of December. Additional points discussed about the multi - family plan include building requirements for recycling container storage. Currently, . there is nothing written in the City Code governing recyclable collection points for storage containers although it is City policy to require adequate storage for containers for recyclable materials along with regular refuse containers before a preliminary plat will be approved. Two of the requirements include 1) an area for ell ecyclable materials containers and 2) that the area be enclosed o match the main building's appearance. Samples of the materials I have distributed so far to multi - family .' units will be distributed at the meeting plus an informational flyer given to residents when programs are ready to start. The goal is to have the informational materials in all of the units by the end of this year, 1989. We may think about a separate brochure for the program once we move into 1990. Currently, of the over 4,800 units we have in the City, just over 700 units are on line with recycling collection programs in their buildings. C. Household Hazardous Waste Collection Day Report D. SCORE Review The SCORE Bill which is part of the tax bill worked on in the 1989 special session was signed into action Tuesday morning, October 3, 1989 at the Dakota County Recyclables Collection Center in Burnsville. A quick review of the provisions of the bill include: 1. A six percent sales tax to be placed on garbage services is estimated to raise over $30 million in a two year period 1990- 1991. Of this $30 million, $22 million will be distributed to the counties. Just over $6 million will be distributed in 1990 and the bulk of the money will be distributed in 1991. Dakota County should receive just over $1 million in the next biennium with the funds generated from the sales tax. 2. The bill also mandates that all schools in the state provide recycling programs that will collect at least three items by 1991. AP 3. Problem materials handling is to be a priority in solid waste management over the next three years. Enclosed in the distribution section you will find a copy of the bill as it went into the session and a short review of the SCORE initiatives. There have been a few small amendments but I don't know exactly what they are, although the bill passed in a form very similar to what you will find in the packet. V. NEW BUSINESS Discussion /Staff Authorization- Commercial /Industrial Work Plan -1989 In the month of October staff will rework the promotional /inform- tional packet produced by the District 14 Community Council to include information relevant to the City of Eagan. We will also revise the packet to emphasize key components of the program which we feel are most important. Overall it is a well done booklet and has a lot of good information for the user. Our goal is to have the rewritten version finished and mailed to all Eagan area members of the Chamber of Commerce by the end of the month. We are currently sifting through the list of the area members of the Chamber of Commerce to find correct contacts and avoid duplications in our mailing. We will also be working on scheduling a presentation with the Chamber at a meeting sometime this fall hopefully prior to the holiday season. We also want to work along with the County recycling plan and be able to share as much information as we can with area businesses to provide the best collection program av, }lable. ( su „ "- t_ ., inert- V . OTHER BUSINESS c.iloLlatr (z VII. DISTRIBIITION Enclosed in your packets are the following materials: 1. On page is the League of Minnesota Cities Summary of SCORE Bill 2. On pages through /3 you will find the Governor's tax bill with t e solid waste reduction and recycling information. 3. The January through June 1989 tonnage re rt for all cities in Dakota County is enclosed on pages / y and VIII. NEXT MEETING The next meeting of the Eagan Solid Waste Abatement Commission will be on Tuesday, November 14, 1989 at 11:30 a.m. Please mark your calendars for that meeting. IX. ADJOURNMENT The meeting will adjourn at or about 1:00 p.m. Recycling Coordinator 3 Subject to Approval MINUTES OF THE SOLID WASTE ABATEMENT COMMISSION Eagan, Minnesota September 12, 1989 A regular meeting of the Eagan Solid Waste Abatement Commission was held on Tuesday, September 12, 1989 at 11:30 a.m. Present were Tim Hoel, Tom Mann, Larry Knutson, Terry Schnell and Tom Moline in place of Kevin Tritz of BFI. Absent were Darlene Bahr, Cindy Ista, Brenda Marshall and Earl Milbridge. Also present was Recycling Specialist Hageman, Assistant to the City Administrator Hohenstein, Administrative Intern Weldon and Floyd Hiar, City resident. AGENDA Upon motion by Knutson, seconded by Schnell, all members voting in favor, the agenda was approved as presented. MINUTES Upon motion by Knutson, seconded by Hoel, all members voting in favor, the minutes of the August 8, 1989 meeting were approved as presented. HAULER DOCUMENTATION Hageman indicated that the Dakota County cities were working on a standardized documentation form to limit the amount of work necessary by the haulers. It would also be consistent with the information put out by the County's recyclables collection center. She stated further that haulers would be allowed to begin submitting reports for payment monthly and that Dakota County will install a scale at the recyclables collection center before the winter freeze. ADDITIONAL RECYCLABLE MATERIALS Hageman stated that the County's recyclable collection center had begun to accept food cans mixed with beverage cans. She stated further that the County would require haulers to begin accepting such cans on February 1, 1990. She stated that unless the Commission felt strongly, that Eagan should accelerate that requirement, that staff would coordinate promotions with the haulers to begin such collection on February 1. Hohenstein stated that plastics as an additional material at the curb presented special problems and that City staff had been pursuing the concept of plastics deposit recycling with the League of Minnesota Cities and Association of Metropolitan Municipals. He stated that a legislative initiative or position would be considered by those groups. Hageman also stated that tonnage reports indicated the City to have 1,032 tons of materials recycled in the first six months and that participation was holding steady at approximately 50% on a weekly basis. She said this information had been provided by haulers in their tonnage reports. 41Y6 CONTAINER DISTRIBUTION Hageman stated that she has delivered approximately 350 additional sets of containers since the program was initiated in March. This number indicates a significant penetration to new households. She further stated that most people calling for containers had been informed of the program by their haulers or City mailings. HOUSEHOLD HAZARDOUS WASTE Hageman stated that the City still required volunteers the October 7, 1989 household hazardous waste collection. Schnell suggested that the City contact organizations such as the Sierra Club, Clean Water Project, Citizens for a Better Environment and Green Peace for volunteers. Staff further discussed the details of the collection and distributed a homeowners guide to household hazardous waste that had been prepared by Dakota County. MULTI - FAMILY RECYCLING WORK PROGRAM Hageman and Hohenstein outlined some basic issues to be resolved to formalize the Multi - Family Recycling Program for the City. These issues were: 1. Recycling requirements for commercial /multi - family licensees. 2. Ordinance modifications to require recycling services for multi- family solid waste contracts. 3. Ordinance modifications concerning multi - family recyclable scavenging. 4. Determination of funding levels /operational support from City /County programs including: a. Container funding- either buy or rent. b. Increase per ton payments. c. Per unit funding d. Other? The Commission discussed these work elements and defined two additional points which included: 1. City requirements for fenced garbage and recycling storage. 2. Multi- family recycling publicity and education. On motion by Knutson, seconded by Schnell, all members voting in favor, the Commission accepted the modified six -point work program and directed staff to return to the Commission with target dates for completion of the elements at the October meeting. DAKOTA COUNTY FUNDING APPLICATION Hohenstein reported that the County funding application had been prepared consistent with the Commission's earlier budget requests and that it would be submitted to the City Council on September 19 for approval for County consideration. He stated that the only modification staff was considering from the earlier discussions was the possibility of replacing the current compost program with a transfer station concept. He stated that the dollar amounts would be comparable but that staff would have to negotiate details with the County compost site and potential vendors. ADJOURNMENT Upon motion by Knutson, seconded by Schnell, all members voting in favor, the meeting was adjourned at 1:05 p.m. JH Date Chairperson Secretary 6 1 Recycling is part of the special session tax bill The tax bill which the legislature will Under the agreement in the tax proposal, receive and a minimum aid county which consider in special session includes the each county would get $27,500 (down would receive $82,500 in the biennium. recommendations of the governors' Select from $38,500 in the governor's pro- Committee on Recycling and the Envi- posal) in the current state fiscal year and The bill also continues the 75 percent Torment (SCORE). $55,000 in fiscal year 1991. The agree- local and 25 percent state split of tax ment would distribute the rest of the revenue, but unlike the previous pro - The bill requires that non - metropolitan funds on a per capita basis. Under a new posal which maintained this split re- counties recycle 25 percent (by weight) section, each county in 1990 and 1991 gardless of the amount of tax revenues, of the county's garbage by the end of would get at least 50 percent of the the new proposal benefits the state by 1993. Metropolitan counties would have revenue generated from taxes within that providing a cap on revenues in excess of a 35 percent goal. county. $5 million. Thus, if actual revenues exceed $30 million but are less than $35 mil - State and Local programs will be avail - The changes benefit Hennepin and other lion, the proposal would allocate reve- able to assist local governments. A six counties that have higher collection and nues on the 75 -25 basis. If, however, percent sales tax on garbage bills which disposal rates. revenues exceed $35 million, the state would go into effect on January 1, 1990 would keep all of the excess. would fund the recycling effort The tax For instance, the state estimates that will generate an estimated $15 million Hennepin County will generate between The League will print a new table show - annually. $7 to $8 million in tax revenue and get ing the estimated distribution of funds back about $3.45 million. Hennepin under the new proposal as soon as the Lawmakers have resolved the issue of County estimates tax collections to be information is available. I bow to distribute the tax proceeds, at closer to $10 million and under the origi- least temporarily. That issue, which nal formula they would have received a The bill also includes a pre- emption of prevented the 1989 Legislature from little over $4 million. Under the new cities and counties from enacting or • passing the bill, boiled down to what agreement, the county would receive no enforcing ordinances restricting plastic extent taxes from urban or more popu- less than half of their county generated packaging until July 1, 1990. It is still lated counties would help subsidize re- tax revenues, which would increase their likely that the governor will appoint a cycling programs in rural, less popu- share to about $5 million. These biennial Select Committee on Plastics and the lated counties. estimates show the difference between Environment (SCOPE) shortly after the what Hennepin County, for instance would special session to prepare recommenda- tions to the 1990 Legislature. JJ Reminder � America's •- The League of Minnesota Cities staff would Competitive Edge ... . like to remind city officials to keep us informed, American Workers. sin on an on -going basis, of any changes in elected officials, clerks, managers, or department heads To find out how your company can M••' in your city, better tap this valuable resource, write: / Elizabeth Dole This will help us keep our records up-to -date at ^) Secretary of Labor all times. ,, U.S. Department of Labor Room N -5419 Thank you for your Washington, DC 20210 cooperation. September 29, 1989 page 7 7 House Research Department's Bill Summary of the GOVERNOR'S TAX BILL Released August 10, 1989 Bill Summary Article # Subject Page Page 1 State -Local Finance Reform 5 1 2 Property Tax Classifications 23 5 3 Property Tax 45 12 4 Local Government Aids 84 15 5 Levy Limits 90 16 6 Property Tax Refund and Targeting 130 19 7 Local Option Revenues 137 20 8 Truth in Taxation 143 21 9 Income and Business Taxes 204 29 10 Sales Tax 253 33 11 Lawful Gambling 262 34 12 Tax Increment Financing 285 36 13 Budget Reserve 303 38 14 Human Services 304 38 15 Miscellaneous 345 41 16 Recycling Requirements and Programs 360 42 17 Revenue for Recycling and Solid Waste Programs 370 44 18 Solid Waste Collection and Disposal 382 45 19 Waste Education 399 46 20 Waste Spending 401 47 21 Office of Waste Management 402 47 22 Appropriations 403 47 • Appendix A -- 48 ARTICLES 16 to 22 SOLID WASTE REDUCTION AND RECYCLING These articles encourage solid waste reduction and recycling by: - requiring related purchasing and recycling programs by state and local agencies; - setting recycling goals for counties; - distributing funds to counties; - imposing a sales tax on waste collection to fund the programs; - establishing programs for market development and litter prevention; and - encouraging study of materials that cause problems in the waste stream. g. Governor's Tax Bill (Released August 10, 1989) August 14, 1989 . House Research Department Page 43 _ 7 ARTICLE 16 • RECYCLING REQUIREMENTS AND PROGRAMS' , SECTION 1 requires Department of Administration to take recycled content into account when purchasing. State agencies must buy recycled material when allowable and cost is no more than 10 percent grater. SECTION 2 requires state agencies to buy uncoated paper when practicable. SECTION 3 adds plastics to list of things included in the definition of recyclable materials. SECTION 4 adds 3 members to the Solid Waste Advisory Council to represent private recyclers. • SECTION 5 requires the Department of Administration to include in its biennial report: (1) a list of purchases with recycled content; (2) results of performance tests on (1); (3) list of all organizations participating in the cooperative purchasing program; and (4) list of purchases that are recyclable. SECTION 6 requires development by the Department of Administration of a model expanded life cycle procurement system to purchase durable and repairable goods to reduce waste generation. SECTION 7 requires the Department of Administration to develop and implement a cooperative purchasing program with other units of government for purchasing recycled or • recyclable materials. SECTION 8 requires the Department of Administration to recycle 40 percent of state agency waste by December 31, 1993. SECTION 9 requires state and local agencies to have containers to recycle at least 3 materials by: (1) January 1, 1991, for the metro area; and (2) January 1, 1993, for the nonmetro area. SECTION 10 requires political subdivisions and government agencies to pursue practices to procure recycled and recyclable materials. SECTION 11 provides that the Office of Waste Management (OWM) will make grants to persons to develop markets for recycling. Fifty percent of any funds for this have to go to counties. SECTION 12 requires that by December 31, 1993: , (1) nonmetro counties must recycle 25 percent of their solid waste; and (2) metro counties must recycle 35 percent. If they fail to meet the goals, mandatory standards may be recommended for legislation. Counties must plan for recycling and have a recycling implementation strategy. • •L . SECTION 13 requires that, effective 10 -1 -90, each county must have at least one recycling center and provide for recycling of problem materials and major appliances. Cities of more Governor's Tax Bill (Released August 10, 1989) August 14, 1989 House Research Department • Page 44 than 5,000 persons in the metro area and cities of the first and second class must have curbside . pickup of recyclables. Counties are to provide public information. SECTION 14 provides that counties must ensure transportation of recyclables to market and may license recyclables collectors. The OWM must establish a statewide transportation system. SECTION 15 provides that the Western Lake Superior Sanitary District (WLSSD) is a county for the purposes of this bill. SECTION 16 provides that the Pollution Control Agency (PCA) will designate recycling centers which must be open at least 12 hours per week, 12 months per year. SECTION 17 requires State Planning to adopt model zoning criteria for placement of recycling centers. SECTION 18 requires the Department of Transportation to design and manufacture recycling center signs. Recycling centers may purchase them and put them up. SECTION 19 requires the Department of Administration I to study building, fire safety and historical preservation code barriers to recycling and make any resulting recommendations to the Legislative Commission on Waste Management (LCWM). SECTION 20 provides that section 13 is effective 10 -1 -90. ARTICLE 17 REVENUE FOR RECYCLING AND SOLID WASTE PROGRAMS SECTION 1 Subd. 1 provides that money appropriated for county programs must be distributed $55,000 to each eligible county and the remainder to the counties based on population (see subdivision 5). Subd. 2 provides that the money must be spent on solid waste reduction and recycling programs. Subd. 3 states that counties who plan and implement recycling programs and provide a 25 percent match are eligible for the distribution. Subd. 4 requires counties to report on use of the money to the OWM and the Office must report to the LCWM. Subd. 5. Notwithstanding subdivision 1, the base distribution amount for the first year only is $38,500 per county. SECTION 2 allows counties to use a special levy to raise the 25 percent match required under section 1. SECTION 3 defines solid waste collection and disposal services as a sale. SECTIONS 4 5 require payment of the sales tax by nonprofits and the government SECTION 6 provides that revenue from the tax goes to the general fund to be used to fund solid waste programs. • August 14, 1989 Governor's Tax Bill (Released August 10, 1989) Aug Page 8 House Research Department • • SECTION 7 specifies how the tax works. Generally it is paid on the cost of service whether the - cost is paid by a local government or by individuals. Recycling costs and government - imposed landfill surcharges are exempt from the sales tax. SECTION 8 requires r a by November In 1990. revenue generated and collected under th e new sales tax to the Leg slatu SECTION 9 repeals section 1, subdivision 5, on July 1, 1990. SECTION 10 provides that the sales tax is effective for sales after September 30, 1989. ARTICLE 18 SOLID WASTE COLLECTION AND DISPOSAL SECTION 1 defines major appliances. SECTION 2 defines problem material. SECTION 3 requires counties to include recycling and management of household hazardous waste in their solid waste plans. SECTION 4 requires that if a county delegates responsibility for solid waste management to another government unit, it must create a funding mechanism to go along with it. SECTION 5 requires the OWM to coordinate waste reduction programs including providing technical assistance and grants SECTION 6 specifies that disposing of an automotive battery in or on the ground is a misdemeanor. SECTION 7 requires a transporter of automotive batteries to deliver them to a recycler. Violation is a misdemeanor. SECTION 8 requires collectors to be licensed. Cities and towns may issue licenses. Counties may do so if cities do not. A license may require volume or weight based pricing of collection services. SECTION 9 requires political subdivisions that provide or pay for waste collection to make the prorated share of those costs obvious to the generators. SECTION 10 states that the PCA may identify problem materials. The PCA and Department of Agriculture (for pesticides, fertilizers, etc.) may prepare informational materials and retail shelf labeling for problem materials. Retailers must use the labels and make the information available. SECTION 11 requires that by December 31, 1990, the OWM must submit a report to the LCWM on a "mechanism to indicate that products are environmentally sound." • SECTION 12 requires the OWM to find and certify ways to recycle or dispose of problem materials and then plan for their separation from waste. , SECTION 13 states that major appliances may not be placed in solid waste or solid waste disposal or processing facilities. Governor's Tax Bill (Released August 10, 1989) August 14, 1989 House Research Department Page 46 SECTION 14 requires that after completion of a study, the OWM must establish a household battery program and counties may participate in it. SECTION 15 makes the PCA household hazardous waste program statewide with a report on establishment of permanent collection sites. SECTION 16 specifies what must be included in counties' household hazardous waste plans. SECTION 17 establishes a civil penalty for littering of at least 2 and not more than 5 times the cost of cleanup plus litigation costs. A private landowner may join an action brought by a county attorney to get damages for injury to private property. SECTION 18 provides that the OWM may make grants to counties for litter prevention if the county has a litter plan. SECTION 19 prohibits, after June 30, 1992, the PCA from issuing or renewing a permit for a solid waste facility that does not have a household hazardous waste plan. SECTION 20 preempts local governments from enacting packaging requirements. SECTIONS 21 -22 place a $5 surcharge on automotive batteries sold at retail to be repaid to the customer if the customer returns a used battery. SECTION 23 authorizes a town board of supervisors to prohibit unlawful deposit of solid waste and require landowners to clean up or be charged for cleanup. SECTION 24 authorizes county boards to do same as section 23. SECTION 25 authorizes counties to require volume based pricing for waste collection or other financial incentives to encourage recycling. SECTION 26 authorizes city councils to do same as section 23. SECTION 27 requires the Met Council to include recycling and household hazardous waste management in its overall solid waste plan. SECTION 28 requires metro counties to do same as section 27. SECTION 29 requires metro counties to provide at least quarterly collection of household hazardous waste. SECTION 30 provides that section 20 is repealed June 30, 1990. ARTICLE 19 WASTE EDUCATION SECTION 1 adds 3 members to the coalition to represent private recyclers. The OWM is to develop informational materials and recommended educational curricula. The OWM must make grants for developing and distributing waste education materials. SECTION 2 requires the state board of education to develop a waste reduction component. • . Governor's Tax Bill (Released August 10, 1989) • . August 14, 1989 House Research Department Page 47 ARTICLE 20 • WASTE SPENDING SECTION 1 requires that by 7- 15 -90, the OWM must report on disposal of major appliances to the LCWM. SECTION 2 requires the PCA to develop and distribute a safety guide for operation of recycling or yard waste composting facilities. SECTION 3 requires the PCA, OWM and Met Council to study solid waste composition and report to the LCWM by 11 -1 -92. SECTION 4 requires the Department of Administration to study and evaluate its purchasing practices for their encouragement of procurement and use of recycled materials and develop a plan and implementation strategy for improvement and present all of the above to the LCWM. SECTION 5 requires the OWM to study proper management of waste plastics. ARTICLE 21 OFFICE OF WASTE MANAGEMENT SECTION 1 appropriates $565,000 for fiscal year 1990 and $2,220,000 for fiscal year 1991 from the general fund to the OWM for general operations. ARTICLE 22 APPROPRIATIONS SECTION 1 generally appropriates $33,211,000 from the general fund to the OWM, the PCA, the Department of Administration and the Department of Revenue. Approximately $24.5 million is passed through to the counties to fund recycling programs. SECTION 2 requires that if the Revenue Department Report in Article 17, section 87, shows revenue collection different than $33,211,000, 75 percent of the excess or deficiency must be added to or subtracted from the county block grant appropriation. If there is excess revenue, the remaining 25 percent goes to the general fund to be used for solid waste programs. Any excess revenue that goes to the county block grants must be distributed so that each county is assured of receiving at lest 50 percent of the revenue generated in that county by the tax. • • • In r%) en in r o N co Tr N CO s in N cv g icc m Tr co qtr en en s N CO , 41 , tn r-i co f co p 0 Tr ri co CV ICI ON CI en en co r- V 4 0 Z 0 H (4 e-1 Z Z r4 4 0 VD 01 CA s In ‘1, ‘.0 0 CO CO In 0 co 0 0 N en N in N en Tr 1-1 CI N N H VD 1.0 r - 0 r-I ■0 •..... . . • • • • • • • • • • • • • . %0 r4 N 1-4 yr en en N CNI r-I 04 CO •-I Tr N co 0 N Tr I&4 tn tn 0 tn N al S r-1 \ tn N N b 0 In H H 0 N CO s el N in f-I Z N b Rztr Ln H •-1 en 'N E4 H r-1 v-1 H at H ‘‘) 01 01 N Lc) ND V;;) 0 CO CO 0 0 CO 0 0 CV 1-1 4.1 N in N COT? r N H 01 0 N 0 0 H 0:4 E-4 • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • . E-4 C/) H v) vD v::• al in %.0 0 4 C4 Ch en 0 ce, o in en 0 M 0 ■0 ■O ■0 tn ON m N■ 1 :1* %.0 •41* en N H El I's N in CV H %0 Z 4 In C H en 0 Tr , :•4 . 41 44 m 4-4 m al o r- c1 In CV 0 0 CO 0 0 H E-1 44 H VD CO CO CV 0 01 0 '44 s •r 0 ‘.0 0 0 01 C1) 0••••••. • 4 • • • • • • • • M 04 N %0 Cr %.0 In CO 0 0 N., 0 .tr eSi 0 rn 0 In in 0 N in Tr N H N en Z f en el en (.4 ‘.0 O c en Tr cv cv en H N 4C (.4 al f.c.1 ca CI CO NO CO to 01 rn 0 el %.0 0 0 0 0 0 H CO E-I 1:4 %.0 ON ON ON CI 0 er 0 CO Tr in o c-i o o CV O (j) • • • • • • • • /44 • • • • • • • • 4 '4 M () Tr al •-4 crl Tr N tn o •%, r4 'fr f'l 0 %0 0 0 S r". 0 01 M 'Cr %.0 0 Z en c• H V O en en en ei CI .--1 Tr r-1 >4 N Z ila 4I N , 41 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ln 0 0 0 0 tn Z 1.1 C) 0 0 0 In o 0 o N 0 0 S LI) 0 0 H tn • 04 >4 • • . • . • • • .4 • • • • • • fr E-1 C.) H in co kio Tr CV t.0 1-1 \ ■t:s N 0 b a) 0 N 1-4 O Gi..1 tr) co m c0 r-i 0 ri f Z H 0 CO C•1 0 r) 0 I E-1 Ix to cp H CV CV Ill H N 1-1 NI H H 0 ri I.1 in 44 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 o 4O o o o tin 0 0 0 0 4 • • • • • • • at'.6 Z 0 0 I.C) 0 0 0 0 0 0 b 0 0 0 H • • • • • • • C.) S N 0 h. in V CV o < 0'. N In 0 In 0 N fl • 0 > H 4 04L to tO m •Zr ON b N.. (.NI CV LA ■D en N I'D 0 IX H Ln Tr FA Z en 1-1 o 1:4 N O \ 41 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 00C)0000000s 0 o o in 0 o o N 0:4 Z >4 • • • • • • • • ICC • • • • • • a Z 0 ' en CO 01 CI co vr r-i ••• s o in N Tr 0 0 0 Z (..) W 0) cv o c-- tO 0 '.0 H Z CO c0 c•Nt r... 0 r) o t:4 m In rs o-I 1-4 rl 1-1 I-4 r-1 01 E CV Z Z N in co N H 0 N en N. N Tr in en •-i 0 co co O 0 N N in CO CO Ifl 0 Tr al CO H co al co o H r-i H H VD CV 0 '.0 CO Co r - %.0 r-1 01 0 0 en en H CO 00 E - I r) . . . . . . . . . .. . . O en 0 cr U1 cr H CV CO CO 0 CO cr CI en 41 In V* r-I CNI CV CV ri f %0 %.0 I-4 CV CV O a• O 0 U 04 ›.4 4 44 W r-i r-I W W g co 4 r-4 g 1-4 U = 40 H r 0 U) = W W LP 4-) 0 q o >I w 4.) O H .-1 4 ts) .-4.-I ezZ g col-4 co 00 0 Z > Ai •ri 0 tr) g 4•4 ecs 4- 0 04 04 W E H E-4 > > ct, g -4-4 " 'CI 0 el 0 4 1:4 0 )-4 H in t In -4-4 4 ) 0 > >1 '04) E • to • 0 el C..) c) w zit, g to w C o w .4-) ••-4 4..) I-1 4-) '>4 1-4 S.4 w P it • .14 --I W '0 14) U) 4-4 cr) iti • 0 C.) C14 0 al Z > 1 1 0 41 04 MI 44 C W g • • 0 cci cci C4 r:4 H Z r./) crl g 0 0 Footnotes to recycling collection figures The reader is cautioned to carefully interpet the numbers presented in attached the table, "Recycling Collection Tonnages, January - June 1989 ". The following footnotes highlight factors to consider when analyzing the figures. 1. Yardwaste Curb Column - Curbside yardwaste totals taken to the County facility in Lakeville are not broken out for commercial and residential haulers. 2. Yardwaste Drop Off Column - Includes totals from both community and County operated facilities. The Dakota County facility opened on March 14, 1989. 3. Curb Recycling Column - Because communities rely on haulers to provide collection totals, and some haulers have not submitted complete records, actual community totals may be greater than reported. 4. Curbside Recycling Column - Although the table covers the period January through June 1989, the majority of the County's curbside recycling programs did not begin until April 1. 5. Drop Off Recycling Column - Estimated figures for batteries and oil are included here, but the actual amount recycled in 1989 will not be available until the end of the year. Figures shown arre based on one -half the 1988 totals. 6. Dakota County General entry - includes household hazardous waste collection totals, Recycle Minnesota Resources totals, Pine Bend totals for yardwaste, Major Appliance Pickup Service totals, and other collectors that do not break out numbers on a community by community basis. 7. Lilydale entry - This community consists of almost exclusively multiunit residential and produces very little yardwaste. 8. Mendota entry - Information on recycling was not available (N /A) at this time, but data will be submitted soon. 9. Rosemount entry - Rosemount's yardwaste curb totals include material collected during a citywide clean -up day. Non - residential material may have been inadvertently counted here which could have inflated the totals. 10. Sunfish Lake - Minimum lot size is 2.5 acres and most residents handle yardwaste on their own site, so little yardwaste is collected by haulers. 11. Rural Recycling District entry - No drop off recycling data is included; figures reflect only curbside collection. Some rural residents compost yardwaste on their own site, little yardwaste is collected by haulers.