03/01/1988 - City Council RegularAGENDA
REGULAR MEETING
EAGAN CITY COUNCIL
EAGAN, MINNESOTA
CITY HALL
MARCH 1, 1988
6:30 P.M.
I. 6:30 - ROLL CALL & PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE (BLUE)
II. 6:35 - ADOPT AGENDA & APPROVAL OF MINUTES (BLUE)
III. 6:40 - STATE REPRESENTATIVE ART SEABERG/LMC LEGISLATIVE COORDINATOR
LIZ WITT - CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT 38
IV. 6:45 - DEPARTMENT HEAD BUSINESS (BLUE)
V.
A. FINANCE DEPARTMENT
1. Request to Prepay 1988' Special Assessments
2. Request for Special Assessment Information for Commercial Resale
B.
1.
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT_
Declaration of Surplus Property/Disposition Authorization (Mobile
Radios)
6:55 - CONSENT AGENDA (ORCHID)
` A.
B.
0��'L� C.
13 D.
�, 13 E.
( `( F.
4)/0 G.
t(' H.
((o I.
1(1 J.
4r
VI. 7:00
PERSONNEL ITEMS
PLUMBERS LICENSES
RECEIVE BIDS/Authorize Purchase, Public Works Vehicle #143 (Dump
Truck)
APPROVE SPECIFICATIONS/Authorize Advertisement for Bids, Public
Works Vehicle #144 (Front End Loader)
PROJECT 522, Receive Feasibility Report/Authorize Public Hearing
(Ridgeview Acres - Streetlights)
PROJECT 532, Receive Petition/Authorize Feasibility Report and
Detailed Plans...(Bridle Ridge 2nd Addition - State Aid Street)
FINAL PLAT, Yorkton Industrial Park 2nd Addition
PROJECT 533, Authorize Feasibility Report for Diffley Road (I -35E
to Heine Strasse Lane - Street
VACATION-, Partial Right-of-way, Receive Petition/Schedule Public
Hearing (Blackhawk Road and Federal Drive)
VACATION, Partial -Right -of -Way, Receive Petition/Schedule Public
Hearing (Safari Pass)
- PUBLIC HEARINGS (SALMON)
PROJECT 527, Lexington Square (Storm Sewer) Continue to March 15
VII. OLD BUSINESS (PINK)
9,(9 A. OFF-SITE SIGNAGE, Thomas Lake Pointe Development
B'. CONTRACT -86-23, Approve Change Order #3 (Holland Lake Storm Clean -
Up)
VIII. NEW BUSINESS (TAN)
o2 `1 A. FISCAL 1987/Budget Adjustments
:5I B. GAMBLING LICENSE (Bingo), Farmington Knights of Columbus
C. AMENDMENT TO CITY CODE, Terms of City Commissions and Size of
Advisory Parks and Recreation Commission
f yo D. SITE PLAN REVIEW with Modifications, Meritor Development
Corporation, for Blackhawk Pond Addition, 46 Single -Family Lots on
0 36.6 Acres, South of Blackhawk Park and West of Highway 35E
COMPREHENSIVE GUIDE PLAN AMENDMENT,
REZONING from R-4 to R-1, and a
VARIANCE for a cul-de-sac
SITE PLAN REVIEW and Revisions to Cliff Lake Centre Preliminary
Plat, Ryan/Hoffman Development, Located at NE Intersection of Rahn
and Cliff Roads
(415F. SITE PLAN REVIEW of Athletic Fields, Independent School District
(2'
• #196, Adjacent to High School and Northview Park, East of Braddock
Trail and South of Northview Park Road
' �� G. COMPREHENSIVE GUIDE PLAN AMENDMENT, City of Eagan, Schindeldecker
/J 1st Addition,
U REZONING of two A (Agricultural) Acres to a PF (Public Facilities)
District
PRELIMINARY PLAT for a City Fire Station Located West of Galaxie
Avenue and East of Hwy 35E
ADOPTION.OF TWO YEAR & FIVE YEAR Economic Development Action Plan
( 9 H.
IX. ADDITIONAL ITEMS (GOLD)
( A. PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT CONTRACTS
I, a 1. Radio Communications Contract, Receive Bids/Award Contract
(Existing Mobile Radio Modifications)
IL� 2. CONTRACT 87-24, Approve Change Order #2 (Contract 87-6) Uncompleted
' Work - Berry Patch Park - Storm Sewer)
1J c� 3. Approve Joint City/County Agreement, Project 510 (Cliff Road -
(1' r)-; Johnny Cake Ridge Road to Pilot Knob Road)
U ,ADMINISTRATIVE AGENDA -(GREEN)
X. VISITORS TO BE HEARD (for those persons not on the agenda)
XI. ADJOURNMENT
PT.' AGENDA APPROVE M AU. E
MEMO TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCILMEMBERS
FROM: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES
DATE: FEBRUARY 24, 1988
SUBJECT: • AGENDA INFORMATION FOR MARCH 1, 1988
AD
After approval is given to the March 1, 1988 agenda and regular
CityCouncil meeting minutes for the February 16, 1988 meeting,
the following items are in order for consideration.
.,STATE" REPIRESENTATI3ViE ART SEABERG` LMC`ILE .i: •.CO'QRD.,1 LI WITT
State Representative Arthur Seaberg is requesting a few minutes
on the City Council agenda to discuss the legislative agenda for
the 1988 session. Also accompanying Representative Seaberg is
Liz Witt, a member of the Board of Directors of the League of
Minnesota Cities who will present position statements taken by
the League for this year's session. Enclosed on page ,2 is a
letter from Representative Seaberg.
There is no formal action required, however, questions or
direction to Representative Seaberg concerning the tax plan and
other issues that impact the City of Eagan is in order.
Arthur W. Seaberg,
District 38B
Dakota County
Committees:
Appropriations
Agriculture, Transportation and
Semi -State Division
Judiciary
Crime and Family Law Division
Transportation
Tom Hedges
City Administrator
City of Eagan
3830 Pilot Knob Road
Eagan, MN 55122
Minnesota
House of
Representatives
February 10, 1988
Dear Mr. Hedges:
-Please accept this letter as a_request for the undersigned to
appear at the Eagan City Council at 6:30 p.m. on -Tuesday, March 1,
1988.
I would like to spend a few -minutes discussing the legislative
agenda for the 1988- session, and --would respond to any questions by
members -of the Council or the Mayor.
AIso attending the session with me will be Liz Witt, a member
of the Board of Directors of the League of Minnesota Cities, who
`would present to you position statements taken by the League.
I will anticipate ap.pearing on the agenda unless I should hear
from you in the negative.
AWS:ak
Reply to: ❑ 393 State Office Building, St. Paul, Minnesota 55155
Yours very truly,
i
hur W. Seaberg
State Representative
0 3146 Farnum Drive, Eagan, Minnesota 55121
Agenda Information Memo
March 1, 1988, City Council Meeting
DEPARTMENT H 4AD ; BUSINESiS.
A. FINANCE DEPARTMENT:
Item 1. Request to Prepay 1988 Special Assessments --Recently a
property owner appeared before the City Council and requested
that a special assessment be paid in full and that interest be
waived for the remainder of 1988. The exception was granted due
to apparent confusion by the property owner's interpretation of
the official assessment notice that was sent out by the City. As
a part of that action, the City staff was given direction to
change the assessment statement by improving its clarity.
Another official request has been made to the City by Jan and
Robert Giefer who reside at 885 Lakewood Hills Drive who are also
requesting that they be allowed to prepay an outstanding balance
of special assessments including the 1988 installment on their
property. Unlike the recent case, the Giefers are expressing no
confusion over the notification and the no -payment appears to
have been an oversight. Enclosed on page is a memo from the
Director of Finance that reviews the Giefer request.
MEMO TO: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES
FROM: FINANCE. DIRECTOR/CITY CLERK VAN OVERBEKE
DATE: FEBRUARY 23,:1988
SUBJECT: GIEFER REQUEST TO PAY 1988 SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS
Jan and Robert Giefer who reside at 885 Lakewood Hills Drive have
requested that they be -allowed to prepay the outstanding balance
of special assessments including the 1988- installment on their
property.
The property was assessed September 1, 1987, under Project 444
which is the Holland Lake Storm Sewer Trunk project. The
assessment was certified for $3,300 for 15 years at 8.5% which
makes the 1988 installment $594, of which.$374 is interest. They
would be agreeable to paying interest to the date of City Council
approval. Assuming that approval is granted at the March 1,
1988 meeting, the City would be forgoing $246.50 in interest.
Since the assessment certification and collection are all being
handled per the applicable state law, only the City Council can
authorize this adjustment.
Unlike the recent case which was approved, the Giefers are
expressing no confusion over the notification and the nonpayment
appears to have been an oversight.
Please let me know if any additional information is required or
if you would like to discuss -this situation in more detail.
Financeirector/City Clerk
EJV/jeh
Agenda Information Memo
March 1, 1988, City Council Meeting
Item 2. Request for Special Assessment Information for
Commercial Resale --Mr. Thomas- Von Behren, President of Twin
Cities Legal Support Services, is requesting special assessment
information for the purpose of reselling the data to law firms,
title companies, real estate firms and other related businesses
that require assessment searches for house closings, refinancings
and other purposes. Mr.- Von Behren is requesting special
assessment search information but objects to the payment to the
City for this data. The City currently charges $8.00 for each
special assessment search.
Mr. Von Behren is objecting to this payment and has requested
time on the City Council agenda to review the matter with the
City Council. The City Administrator and Director of Finance are
both meeting with Mr. Von Behren late Friday afternoon and will
provide an additional memorandum and legal opinion by the City
Attorney's office on Monday as.a part of the Administrative
Packet.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny Mr.
Von Behren's request that the City waive any -and all charges for
preparing special_ assessment .search information for parcels
requested by Mr. Von Behren for his commercial resale of the
data.
Agenda Information Memo
March 1, 1988, City Council Meeting
B. PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT:
Item 1. Declaration of Surplus Property/Disposition of
Authorization (Mobile Radios)-- As a part of the upgrading of he
City-wide radio communication system, 24 mobile radios among the
various City departments -have been replaced and are no- longer
useful due to obsolescence and/or uneconomical retrofitting for
compatibility with the new radio communication system.
Therefore, it would be appropriate to declare these 24 mobile
radio units as surplus City property for proper disposition.
Contact has been made with General Communications Company and
Communications Center, Inc., to determine -a salvage value for all
excess radio units. Communications Centez-made the only offer of
providing one new Midland.. -mobile radio in exchange for the 24
surplus radios. This new radio has a value of approximately
$750. Based on no other offers being tended, it is the staff's
recommendations that these surplus radios be disposed to
Communication Center as a trade-in for one new Midland mobile
radio.
The salvage value and disposition recommendation has been
-concurred- with by Mr. John DuBois, consulting radio
communications engineer.
ACTION TO BE --CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To declare 24 mobile
radios as surplus property and authorize their trade to
Communication Center in exchange for one new Midland mobile
radio.
Agenda Information Memo
March 1, 1988, City Council Meeting
ONSENT AGENDA.
There are ten (10) items on the agenda referred.to as consent items
requiring one (1) motion by the City Council. If the City Council
wishes to discuss any :of the items in further detail, those items
should- be removed from the Consent Agenda and placed under.
Additional Items unless the discussion required is brief.
PERSONNEL ITEMS
A.. PERSONNEL ITEMS -
Item 1. Parks & Recreation Intern -- As a part of the 1988
budget, an allotment was created in the Parks and Recreation
budget for intern services (temporary positions). The Director
of Parks and Recreation is recommending that Mel Bailey be hired
as an intern for that department starting March 14, 1988. Mr.
Bailey has a Bachelors. Degree in Accounting and Business
Administration and is presently completing his Masters -in Parks &
Recreation Administration.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the hiring of
Mel Bailey as an intern in the Parks & Recreation Department
starting March 14, 1988.
Item 2. Parks & Recreation Engineering Technician Intern --
During the summer of 1987, Mr. William Bradley served as a parks
engineering technician intern, helping with designandinspection
work for parks construction. The Director of Parks and
Recreation is recommending extending that internship to the
coming season and is recommending that Mr. Bradley return for
that internship starting March 7, 1988. The funding for this
internship is contained in the 1988 budget.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the hiring of
William Bradley as an engineering technician intern for the Parks
& Recreation Department starting March 7, 1988.
Item 3. Police Association Collective Bargaining Agreement -- In
official action at the February 2, 1988 City Council meeting, the
council.. approved an offer to be made to the Eagan Police
Association regarding terms for the collective bargaining
agreement which would be effective for the 1988 and 1989 calendar
Years. Basically, the offer included a 2.5% compensation
increase for 1988 and a 3% compensation increase for 1989; a
compensation rate for investigators to be set at 5% over the base
patrol rate: insurance provisionsandadjustments to certain
contract language. The Police Association has accepted. the
City's offer. Therefore, the Council should formally ratify the
agreement at this time.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS, ITEM: To ratify the collective
bargaining agreement, per terms of the Council's last offer,
between the Eagan Police Association and the City of Eagan for
1988 and '1989.
1
Agenda Information Memo
March 1, 1988, City Council Meeting
Item 4. Maintenance Bargaining Unit (Local 320) Collective
Bargaining Agreement -- In official action at the February 2,
1988 City Council meeting, the council approved an offer to be
madeto the Eagan maintenance bargaining unit (Teamsters Local
320) regarding terms for the collective bargaining agreement
which would be effective for the 1988, 1989 and 1990 calendar
years. Basically, the offer included a 2.5% compensation
increase for 1988 and a 3% compensation increase for 1989 and
1990; freezing the current starting wage for the three years of
the agreement; insurance provisions; and adjustments to certain
contract language. The maintenance bargaining unit has accepted
the City's offer. Therefore, the Council should formally ratify
the agreement at this time.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To ratify the collective
bargaining agreement, per terms of the Council's last offer,
between the maintenance bargaining unit and the City of Eagan for
1988, 1989 and 1990.
Item 5. Clerical Reorganization - With the creation of the
Community Development Department in the 1988 budget, it was
necessary to reorganize the clerical staff at the Eagan Municipal
Center. That reorganization was accomplished January 1, 1988.
However, because of this reorganization, the work which was
performed by one full-time clericalposition in the Finance
Department was reduced. Another result of the reorganization is
the need in the new Community Development Department for more
clerical aid than was previously allotted there. Please refer to
the memo enclosed on pages /. through /(7 for a more detailed
explanation of this situation. The recommended course of action
detailed in that memo involves the elimination of a part-time
position in Finance; the transferring of that past -time
position's duties to the full-time position; the lay off of the
current part-time employee in Finance; the transferring of the
half-time funding allotment to Community Development, which would
then create a full-time position using that allotment and one of
its current half-time positions. It is the recommendation of the
City Administratorand the involved department heads that the
following action be approved. Please note that no additional
funding will be necessary; funds will merely be transferred from
one department allocation to another:
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: 1. To approve the
elimination of the part-time assessment clerk typist position in
the Finance Department with the tasks for that position being
reassigned to the full-time- clerk typist position in Finance.
(This action would include the lay off of the person currently
occupying the part-time position.) 2. To approve the transfer
of the allocation for a half-time clerk typist to the Community
Development Department which would then createa full-time
position from one of its half-time positions. (This action would
not include a lay off of current personnel but the expansion of
time for one qualified employee from part to full-time.)
MEMO TO: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES
FROM: ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT DUFFY
DATE: FEBRUARY 16, 1988
SUBJECT: FURTHER CLERICAL REORGANIZATION
As you are aware, with the creation of the Community Development
Department and the addition of two clerical positions in the 1988
budget, the clerical staff at the Eagan Municipal Center under-
went a process of reorganization at the beginning of 1988. As a
result, the "typing pool" which had performed typing tasks° for
all City departments was dissolved and its personnel reassigned
to specific departments within the City. Other clerical posi-
tions were also reassigned so. that individual departments ended
up with a secretary and at least one clerk typist who would work
for the specific departments exclusively. The exceptions to the
one secretary/one clerk typis-t norm were the Administration and
Finance Departments which share one secretary and one clerk
typist (word processing/computer) between them and the Community
Development Department (combined Planning and Protective Inspec-
tions Departments) which has the equivalent of one full-time
secretary and two full-time clerk typists (one clerk typist posi-
tion is filled by two half-time personnel).
A complication has arisen from the above reorganization because
there exists in the City a positionwhich, like the old typing
pool, was designed to perform filing and copying chores for all
departments. This is the "file clerk typist" position in
Finance, a full-time position which in addition also backs up the
front counter andperforms financial clerk typist duties. With
the reorganization of the clerical personnel, both engineering
and administration have taken over their own filing tasks and
community development would prefer to do likewise, given adequate
personnel. The elimination of those filing/copying tasks from
the file clerk typist's time results in the loss of approximately
4 hours -per day (1/2 time).
After meetings and study of the situation between the City Ad-
ministrator, the Director of Finance, the City Planner, the Chief
Building Official and the Administrative Assistant in charge of
personnel, the following recommendation has been made for for-
warding to the City Council:
In Finance, eliminate the current part-time position of
assessment clerk typist (1/2 time) and transfer the
tasks performed by that position to thefull-time posi-
tion which was previously_ referred to as file clerk
typist and which would be referred to as finance clerk
typist. That full time position would also continue to
back up the front counter, to perform filing and copy-
•
ing tasks for the Finance Department and to perform
other financial clerk typist functions. This action
would include the -lay off of the current part-time
employee.
2. Transfer the half-time clerk typist allotment to the
Community Development Department which would then be
able toperform its own filing/copying tasks, which
would be spread among the existing clerk typist
positions. This transfer would also provide additional
help for other clerk typist tasks such as word
processing, other computer work, phones, inspection
scheduling, etc. This type of assistance is currently
needed by that department and will be needed more when
a Community Development Director is hired, especially
•in the word processing/computer functions. It is the
recommendation of the City Planner and the Chief
Building Official that the maximum benefit would be
received by them if one of the current half-time
positions were expanded to full-time. It is also their
recommendation that, rather than lay off another
current part-time employee and hire a new full-time
employee, that one -of the current part-time Community
Development employee's time be increased to full-time.
This action is appropriate in this specific instance
because the employee involved recently applied for and
tested for a full-time position in the City and was
among .the finalists for that -position. (Please note
that the transfer of the current part-time employee in
Finance to Community Development was considered, but
the concept was rejected because of the different
qualifications for the two positions.)
The action which should be considered by the Council includes the
followings - -
1. To approve the elimination of the part-time assessment
clerk typist position in the Finance Department with
the tasks for that position being reassigned to the
full-time clerk typist position in Finance. (This
action would include the lay off of the person
currently occupying the part-time position.)
2. To approve the transfer of the allocation for a half-
time clerk typist to the Community Development
Department which would then create a full-time position
from one of its half-time positions. (This action
would notinclude a lay off of current personnel but
the expansion of time for one qualified employee from
part to full-time.)
If you have any questions, please contact me.
Agenda Information Memo
March 1, 1988, City Council Meeting
PLUMBERS LICENSES
B. Plumbers Licenses --There are nine plumbing licenses in order
for renewal. For a copy of the list of plumbers licenses refer
to page (Z.L.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON. THIS ITEM: To approve the list of
plumbers licenses as presented.
PLUMBING LICENSES MARCH 1, 1988
1 Ashby Plumbing
2. Jerry's Plumbing
3. McDonald Plumbing System, Inc.
4. Peine Plumbing & Heating
5. Sauber Plumbing & Heating
6. Schulties Plumbing & Heating
7. Stant Plumbing & Heating
8. Thoen Plumbing, Inc.
9. Wenzel Plumbing & Heating, Inc.
Agenda Information Memo
March 1, 1988, City Council Meeting
RECEIVE BIDS/AUTHORIZE PURCHASE/VEHICLE #143
C. Receive Bids/Authorize Purchase, Public Works Vehicle #143
(Dump Truck)--As'a part of the approved 1988 Budget, the staff
solicited firm quotations from authorized vendors through the
Hennepin County Joint Purchase Agreement for the purchase of a
single -axle dump truck. The low bid was provided by Northstar
International in the amount of $39,811.10 for the cab and chassis
only. With the estimated cost of $25,000 to complete the
retrofitting of this vehicle with the appropriate dump box, plow
wing and sander, this vehicle will still be within the 1988
budget of $65,000.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM:: -To receive the bids from
Hennepin County Joint Purchase -and authorize the purchase of
Vehicle #143 (Public Works - Dump Truck) from Northstar
International in the amount of $39,811.10.
D. Approve
#144 Front
Budget, the
completed the
end loader.
consideration
APPROVE SPECS/AD FOR,. BIDS/VEHICLE #144
Specs/Authorize Ad For Bids (Public Works Vehicle
End Loader) --In accordance with the approved 1988
Public Works Vehicle Maintenance Division has
specifications for the acquisition of a new front -
These are being presented - to the Council in
for authorization to advertise for formal bids.
The specifications are being provided to request a guaranteed
buy-back at the end of fiveyears or 6,000 hours of operation,
whichever occurs first, similar to other major pieces of heavy
equipment purchased_.in the past..
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the
specifications for Vehicle 4144 -(Public Works - Front End -Loader)
and authorize the advertisement for a bidopening to be held at
10:00 a.m. on March 25, 1988.
PROJECT 522 -/FEASIBILITY REPORT/PUBLIC HEARING/RIDGEVIEW ACRES
E Project 522,. Receive Feasibility Report/Authorize Public
Hearing (Ridgeview Acres - Streetlights) --In -.response to a
petition from property owners within the RidgeviewH.. Acres
development, a feasibility report has been.prepared discussing
the installation of streetlights within this subdivision. This
completed. report is now being presented to the Council for their
consideration of scheduling a formal public hearing to be held on
April 5, 1988.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To__receive the feasibility
-report for Project 522 (Ridgeview Acres - Streetlights) and
authorize the public hearings to be held on April 5, 1988.
13
Agenda Information Memo
March 1, 1988, City Council Meeting
PROJECT 532, RECEIVE PETITION/FEASIBILITY REPORT/DETAILED
PLANS/BRIDLE RIDGE 2ND
F. Project 532, Receive Petition/Authorize. Feasibility Report
& Detail Plans (Bridle Ridge 2nd Addition) - State Aid Street --
The staff has received a petition from the property owners and
proposed developers of the Bridle Ridge 2nd Addition (Govern
Trust and Sienna Corporation, respectively) requesting the
preparation of a feasibility report and simultaneous preparation
of detail plans and specifications for the installation of the
north/south municipal state aid street connecting Northview Park
Road with Wescott Road between the Eagan High School and
Woodlands Elementary School site.
Although this proposed subdivision is not scheduled for Planning
Commission review until March 22,_ they have guaranteed all costs
associated with preparation of this report and plans if for some
reason the proposed development and/or public improvement is not
approved as a part of the required public hearing process. The
reason for this early petition and initiation of work is due to
the required 6-10 week municipal state aid approval process
through MnDOT.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To receive the petition
for Project 532 (Bridle Ridge 2nd Addition - State Aid Street)
and authorize the preparation of a feasibility report and detail
plans.
FINAL PLAT APPROVALJYORKTON INDUSTRIAL- PKS2N-D-ADDN
G. Final Plat Approval, Yorkton Industrial Park South 2nd
Addition --The staff has received an application for final plat
approval for the above -referenced subdivision located east of
T.H. 149 and south of Becker Road as shown by the plat map
enclosed on page /< All conditions of the preliminary plat
approval of October 20, 1987, have been satisfactorily complied
with. All final plat application materials have been submitted,
reviewed by staff and found to be in order for favorable Council
action.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM:' To approve the final plat
for Yorkton Industrial Park South 2nd Addition and authorize the
Mayor and City Clerk to execute all related documents.
,,
o
' . I , ,•-:,,, -. cs,
r.:
'=•:( •-,'‘';'; .'?:,
, 1
"°-
,,,
I
•-:
; .•,
CL, .:. ;-i .,' , ,-
I
(r)
_ ,, ,;., \
1—• ...• , ),,,
,.., ,"`'
t•••,.--,
.4.6%
I I
\\
4‘..:
z .r0,1 r7:11,11
-‘,..,.- , ,
, \
.1 -4.___.-_,-----------, ,i,-:_4,?; -- _,L.-3;_.--.---_ --
(.., ...
\.-. ,
a , , ......
H.1..,) I (J )1- ,;;-",ii,- ;i..1.,.','.
,,... (..‘....oz
4 F,:,
—x— „
1 s,,,,00..,6ns., A
\\\'..',..—.0 \
\
0 0
NA
,
\ , \
\ \
\ \
d \ t
` ; v. ‘, TT •-, 5
•-•F`-• '
'6 7,
1 i
'-'• 5 ?. 7. 1 g ..-
i
,.,
..
,,
OUTLOT
_
.
1 , • /
•
° \
\
:.. ) .
.. ,
.,-. ,.
;•. t !
1 .,,
•", ;, '1 "
......^ I \
tf, ' c.,\•• !_
, •
r
1 ',.';•:, "",:
I
1 ,,p
, 0
°°,1•'2,,,
AN
\-.'-'
N .
0 \ \ \ \ \.,:s..\...., \\ \:,_ \ \\\\ \
\.-4::\ \ \ • • .
'.:. \ . -
., : • I \\'',3.
A , \ 0,,,,4,, \ \
•.(
'-. \
A.,.: 1 1 N:',/,,C‘. P 0
7 0 \ c:, \ \
1..•.r. \
\ ,
\ \.• \
\ \
(••:;,, \ A
;., \
.,, \
\ \ '' \
0:.`,-2 \ \
\ -.•.:-..,.„ A \
\ : \
HIUOM
LAND SURVEYORS
5 "
: `i
F ;
z k -;
1
t.
•
Agenda Information Memo
March 1, 1988, City Council Meeting
PROJECT 533/FEASIBILITY REPT/DIFFLEY RD -35E TO HEINE STRASSE LANE
H. Project 533, Authorize Feasibility Report (Diffley Road - 35E
to Heine Strasse Lane --As a part of the County's 5 -year Capital
Improvement Program, Diffley Road from 35E to Heine Strasse Lane
is scheduled to be upgraded in 1989. Because of the extensive
design requirements and joint powers agreement, it is necessary
to initiate the feasibility report and subsequent public hearing
process in an advanced time frame. Therefore, staff is
requesting authorization from the City Council to proceed with
the preparation of the detailed feasibility report for the street
and utility improvements proposed for Diffley Road (County Road
30) from 35E to Heine Strasse Lane (present terminus of Diffley
Road improvement under Pilot Knob Road project in 1988).
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To.. authorize the
preparation of a feasibility report for Project 533 (Diffley Road
- 35E to Heine Strasse Lane for streets and utilities).
VACATION/PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY/BLACKHAWK HILLS RD & FEDERAL DR
I. Vacation of Public Right -of -Way, Receive Petition/Order
Public Hearing (Blackhawk Hills Road and Federal Drive) --The
staff has received a petition from the developers of the proposed
Stoney Point Addition and the Blackhawk Ridge Addition adjacent
to where Blackhawk Hills Road and Federal Drive meet. All
application materials have been submitted, reviewed by staff and
found to be in order for Council consideration of scheduling a
formal public hearing to vacate the excess right-of-way
previously acquired by MnDOT for the construction of this service
road as a part of I -35E.
ACTION --TO Bim=CONS-I-DERE-D ON THIS ITEM --To receive the—petition
for the vacation of partial right-of-way for Blackhawk Hills Road
and Federal Drive and schedule the public hearing to be held on
April 5, 1988.
VACATION/PARTIAL RIGHT-OF-WAY/SAFARI PASS
J. Vacation of Partial Right -of -Way, Receive Petition/Order
Public Hearing (Safari Pass) --The staff has received a petition
to vacate the excess right-of-way along the west side of Safari
Pass -adjacent to the Eagan Royale Addition. This excess, right-
of-way was acquired by MnDOT as a part of the I -35E frontage road
construction program and subsequently conveyed to the City. This
right-of-way is in excess of current City standards and/or needs.
.Therefore, it would be appropriate for the Council to schedule a
formal public hearing to discuss this proposed vacation of public
right-of-way.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To receive the petition to
vacate a portion of Safari Pass right-of-way and schedule the
public hearing to be held on April 5, 1988.
Agenda Information Memo
March 1, 1988, City Council Meeting
- PUBLIC.` HEARINGS
PROJECT 527, LEXINGTON SQUARE
A. Project 527, Lexington Square (Storm Sewer) --On January 19,
the Council received the feasibility report for the above,-
referenced
bove-referenced project and scheduled- a public hearing to be held on
March 1, 1988. During the notification process for this public
hearing, it was discovered that, while all property owners
received a notice of the public hearing, not all of those
property owners were included in the legal description of the
notice they received, thereby creating certain confusion and
questionable validity to the public hearing notification process.
Therefore, it is the City Attorney's recommendation that this
public hearing be continued until March 15 to allow a new
notification process to be completed._ Enclosed op page /2? is a
copy of the cover letter sent out to all property owners
informing them of -this proposed continuance.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS_ITEM: To continue the public
hearing for Project 527 (Lexington Square - Storm Sewer) to March
15, 1.988.
3830 PILOT KNOB ROAD, P.O. BOX 21199
EAGAN, MINNESOTA 55121
PHONE: (612) 454-8100
February 23, 1988
VIC ELLISON
Mayor
THOMAS EGAN
DAVID K. GUSTAFSON
PAMELA McCREA.
THEODORE WACHTER
Council Members
THOMAS HEDGES
City -Administrator
EUGENE VAN OVERBEKE
City Clerk
Re: Project 527, Lexington Square Storm Sewer
Public Hearing Notification - Date & Legal Description Correction
Dear Property Owner:'
Recently, you received a notice from the City of .Eagan regarding a
public -hearing scheduled for March 1, 1988, to discuss proposed
storm sewer improvements within the Lexington Square development as
a result of the flooding.thatoccurred in July, 1987.
It has come to our attention that, while every affected property
owner was mailed his notice, it was incomplete by not accurately
listing all affected property owners.
Therefore, enclosed with this letter is a new notice informing you
that the PUBLIC HEARING originally scheduled for March 1 has been
CONT'IN'UED TO MARCH 15, 19138.
We -apologize for any confusion or inconvenience that may result from
this.continuance,
Sincerely,
Deanna Kivi
Special Assessment Clerk
DN / j j
cc--: Dave Keller, Assistant City Attorney
Enclosure
THE LONE OAK TREE. THE SYMBOL OF STRENGTH AND GROWTH IN OUR COMMUNITY
Agenda Information Memo
March 1, 1988, City Council Meeting
OLD BUSINESS
OFF-SITE SIGNAGE FOR THOMAS LAKE POINTE DEVELOPMENT
A. Off -Site Signage for Thomas Lake Pointe Development --The
Dominium Group is requesting.a variance to the City's off-site
signage for the Thomas Lake Pointe Development. Mr. Jack Safar,
representing Dominium has stated in the letter dated December 21,
1987 to the City that his company's effort to control building
elevations as well as minimizing the retention of trees has
greatly and intentionally limited the project's visibility from
any public right-of-way. As a result, Mr. Safar is requesting
additional off-site signage as a variance to the City's new sign
ordinance that limits and restricts off-site signage.
For a copy of the planning report and letters provided by the
Dominium. Group, refer to pages through g ;2,7,1.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny off-
site signage as requested by the Dominium Group for the Thomas
Lake Pointe Development.
/9
CITY OF EAGAN
SUBJECT: SPECIAL USE PERMIT
APPLICANT: DOMINIUM GROUP
LOCATION: INTERSECTIONS OF THOMAS LAKE ROAD &
CLIFF ROAD AND THOMAS LAKE ROAD &
DIFFLEY ROAD
EXISTING ZONING: AG ON THE DIFFLEY SITE
R-1 ON THE CLIFF ROAD SITE
DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: MARCH 1, 1988
DATE OF REPORT: FEBRUARY 24, 1988
REPORTED BY: PLANNING DEPARTMENT
APPLICATION SUMMARY: An application has been submitted
requesting a Special Use Permit to allow off-site temporary
directional signs for the. Thomas Lake Pointe Apartments located
aiong_the east side of Thomas Lake Road between Diffley and Cliff
Roads. The project was designed and constructed with .a great
deal of site sensitivity. As a result, the buildings have very
little exposure .from the public streets:
The proposed signs would be constructed of 4' x 12' laminated
wood -mounted on concrete. They would appear more permanent. -than
temporary. They would be -located on the north side of Diffley
Road at the Thomas Lake Road intersection and the northeast
intersection of Thomas Lake Road and Cliff Road. Dominium would
like to keep the .signs up during the initial "rent up" period
that may last a year or so. A memo from Dominium's marketing
-coordi-nator- detailing -the -percent -of- '=-wa1.k--in"- people that , visit ,--
the project and a letter from Jack Safar have been attached for
your review.
If approved, this special Use Permit shall be subject to the
one-time sign fee of $2.50'per square foot.
s:oU) it :orpora d
3140 HARBOR LANE MINNEAPOLIS,.;y'IINNESOTA 55441 612/559-1711
December 21, 1987
Mr. Tom Hedges, City Administrator
City of Eagan
3830 Pilot Knob Road
Eagan, MN 55121
RE: OFF SITE SIGNAGE: THOMAS LAKE POINTE DEVELOPMENT
Dear Tom:
In accordance with our conversation this date, you will find
attached hereto a memorandum from Dominium -Management Service
Inc. which indicates the importance of signage- at: the
intersections of Thomas Lake Road with Cliff and Diffley.
As you know, the guidance _of this development through the
municipal approval process required sensitivity both to our
site and the surrounding neighborhood. Our efforts to control
building elevations as well as maximizing the retention of
trees has greatly and intentionally limited the project's
visibility from any public right of way. - Further, at all times
during our efforts to obtain -full municipal approval for the
development we had no reason not to expect the ability to
market apartment units -with reasonable -offsite signage.
As a result of- the above referenced factors as well as the
demonstrated importance of certain offsite signage based_. on the
attached memorandum,.,Dominium would request the City -of Eagan
approve a "limited" signage program at the intersections of
Thomas Lake Road with.Cli.ff and Diffley.
In the event you have any questions concerning -•this matter or
more__specifically•attempt{to define the "limited" nature of our
request, please feel free to contact either myself or Brendt
Rusten (General Manager - Dominium Management Service Inc.) at
your convenience.
This request is made -most sincerely and respectfully.
Very ru. y yours,
;ack W. Safa
ci Vice President
JWS/sl
dominium
management
service inc.
• 3140 Harbor Lane • Minneapolis, MN 55441 • 612-559-1495
• 1020 North Broadway • Suite 210 • Milwaukee, WI 53202 • 414-277-8040
DATE December 8, 1987
/0
TO Jack Safar - DGI
FROM Kris Savoie - Marketing Coordinator
SUBJECT : OFF-SITE SIGNAGE FOR :THOMAS LAKE POINTE APARTMENTS
Our signage on Cliff and Diffley and Thomas Lake Pointe Road is
crucial to our Lease -up at Thomas Lake Pointe Apartments.
Based on Dakota County's 1986 Traffic Study, the traffic count
on Cliff is 13,500 cars per day and on Diffley it is 6,700 per
day. Thomas Lake Road has not been counted by the City of
Eagan
A major portion of our prospects is from our off-site -signage
(especially with our secluded location). -
Below I have :listed the percentage of our "walk-in" prospects
whose visit occurred as a direct result of "driving by" our
local signage.
August, 1987
September, 1987
October, 1987
November, 1987
550
480
420
420
If we are to do Lease -up on a timely basis, the signage is a
crucial- element --in doing -this effectively. -
KS/sl
cc: Brendt Rusten
Pamela Soderquist
Professionals In Real Estate Management
Agenda Information Memo
March 1, 1988, -City Council Meeting
CONTRACT 86-23,.APPROVE CHANGE ORDER #3/HOLLAND LAKE
B. Contract 86-23, Approve Change Order #3, Holland Lake Storm
Sewer --The dictation and attachments for this item will be
included with the Additional Information packet on Monday,
February 29.
a3
Agenda Information Memo
March 1, 1988, -City Council Meeting
NEW, BUSINESS
FISCAL 1987/BUDGET ADJUSTMENTS
A. Fiscal 1987/Budget Adjustments ---Each year the Director of
Finance prepares a list of budget adjustments for the preceding
year. These budgetary adjustments represent certain expenditures -
that were allowed in 1987 that exceeded the budgetary guideline
that was established for that calendar year. Budget adjustments
are required prior to preparation and finalization of the
financial report.
For a copy of a•memo and list of budget adjustments as loPrepared
by the Director of Finance, refer to pages ,Z5 through O.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the
fiscal 1987/budget adjustments as prepared and presented for
consideration.
MEMO TO: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES
FROM: FINANCE DIRECTOR/CITY CLERK VAN OVERBEKE
DATE: FEBRUARY 23, 1988
SUBJECT: 1987 BUDGET ADJUSTMENTS
Prior to closing the books for 19-87 activity, I would like to recommend a
number of budget adjustments. The purpose of these adjustments is to allow
the City to present a more realistic budget verses actual statement in the
December 31, 1987 annual financial report. The requested City Council action
will formalize the adjustments which are primarily the result of previous
policy or authorization which is difficult to pinpoint in the City Council.
minutes at this time. It should be noted that this action will only change
how the 1987 General Fund operations will be reported as the expenditures have,
already been made.
In total, the General Fund appropriation will increase by $351,070 from.
$7,389,630 to $7,740,700, and the $111,920 contingency appropriation will be
allocated to operating departments. This budget increase will be offset, by
adjustments tothetotal revenue estimate of $351,070.
I am, therefore, requesting that the following line items listed by department
be amended as follows. Since only a minimum number of line items.. are listed,
neither old or new department totals will foot in this presentation. Also,
increases or decreases to those specific line items may be more or less than
is actually necessary for that line item but serves to balance the department
in total. -
RECOMMENDED
DEPARTMENT ORIGINAL RECOMMENDED ADJUSTMENT REVISED
LINE ITEM APPROPRIATION INCREASE (DECREASE) APPROPRIATION
Mayor &-City Council
Insurance $13,410 $22,590 $36,000
Conferences & Schools 2,50.0: 1,800 4,300
Department Totals $48,280 $24,390 $72,670
Administration
Salaries and _Wages, -
Regular $159,530 $5,000 $164,530
Other Contract. Services 19,140 12,000 31,140
Department Totals $321,050 $17,000 - $338,050
Data Processing
Salaries and Wages
Regular - 0 $17,200
Electronic Data
Processing $93,110
Department Totals -$140,340 $17,200
($27,000)
($27,000)
$17,200
66,110
$130,540
1987 BUDGET ADJUSTMENTS
FEBRUARY. 23', 1988 -
PAGE TWO
RECOMMENDED
DEPARTMENT ORIGINAL RECOMMENDED ADJUSTMENT REVISED
LINE ITEM APPROPRIATION INCREASE (DECREASE) APPROPRIATION
Finance/City Clerk
Salaries and Wages
Regular $221,210 $50,100 $271,310
Office Supplies 18,000 ` 15,000 33,000
Prof. Serv. Non -Auditing 3,000 5,300 8,300
Publishing Legal Notices 7,500 4,200 11,700
Other Contractual Services 2,000 2,000 4,000
Election Judges 5,000 2,000 7,000
Office Furnishings & Equip. 3,250 1,200 .4,450
Department Totals $429,370 . $79,800 $509,170
Legal
Prof. Legal Services
Department Totals
$175,000
$175,000
$45,000
$45,000
$220,000
$2.20,000
Planning and Zoning
Salaries and Wages
Regular $142,250 $14,000 $156,250
Prof. Services -
Planning 9,000 8,000 17,000
Department Totals $212,490 $22,000 $234,490
General Government Bldgs.
Salaries and Wages -
Temporary $19,660 ($9,000) $10,660
Department Totals $139,200 ($9,000) $ 0,200
Cable TV
Salaries andWages -
Regular . $31,720 ($12-,000)... $19,720
Other Contract. Services 59,500
(47,000) 12,500
Department Totals $98,150 _ ($59,000) $39,150
Police
Salaries and Wages
Regular' $1,721,680 $110,000 $1,831,680
Motor Fuels -50;000 ($9,000) 41,000
Telephone 32,000 (4,000) 28,000
Insurance 53,470 _(5,700) 47,770
Conferences &:"Schools 20,000 (7,000) 13,000
1987 BUDGET ADJUSTMENTS
FEBRUARY 23, 1988
PAGE THREE
DEPARTMENT
LINE ITEM
ORIGINAL
APPROPRIATION
RECOMMENDED ADJUSTMENT
INCREASE (DECREASE)
RECOMMENDED
REVISED.
APPROPRIATION
Tuition/Books.Reimburse
Mobile Equipment
Department Totals
Fire
Salaries and. Wages
Temporary
Operating Supplies
General
Clothing & Personal
Equipment Parts
Prof. Services -
Gas Service
Land.
Other Equipment
Department Totals
4,500
110,000
$2,128,850
$130,880
$110,000
(4,000)
(9,000)
($38.700)
500
101,000
$2,200,150
4,500
Equip. 11,640
3,800
Medical 14,180
12,500
10,000
65,000
$51.8,130
Protective Inspections
Prof. Services
Electrical Insp
Prof. Services -
$3,000
5,000
7,000
6,000
$21,000
($4,000)
(4,000)
(10,000)
(12,000)
($30,000)
$133,880
9,500
18,640
9,800
10,180
8,500
0
53,000
$509,130
$60,320
Building Insp. 105,000
Insurance 8,460
Conference and Schools 3,630
Department Totals $451,540
($16,000)
(24, 000)
(2,000)
(2,000)
($44,`000)
$44,320
81,000
6,460
1,630
$407,540
Civil Defense
Mobile Equipment
Department Totals
Public Works/Engineering
Salaries and Wages -
Regular
-Professional Services
Engineering
Office Furnishing and
$4,600
$7,690
$254,.050
5,000
Equipment 450
Department Totals $388,510
$62,000
85,000
2,700
$149,700
($3,400)
($3,400)
$1,200
$1,200
$316,0.50
90,000
3,150
$538,210
1987 BUDGET ADJUSTMENTS
FEBRUARY 23, 1988
PAGE FOUR
RECOMMENDED
DEPARTMENT ' ORIGINAL RECOMMENDED ADJUSTMENT REVISED
LINE ITEM APPROPRIATION INCREASE (DECREASE) APPROPRIATION
Streets and Highways
Salaries and Wages -
Regular $280,780 $33,000 $313,780
Motor Fuels 25,000 ($8,000) 17,000
Repair & Maint. Supplies 2,000 13,000 15,000
Street Maint. Materials 75,000 30,000 105,000
Signs & Stripping
Materials 9,500 10,000 19,500
Electricity - Street
Lights 18,000 8,000 26,000
Machinery & Equip. Rental 3,000 12,000 15,000
Buildings 70:300 (25,000) 45,300
Department Totals $1,186,100 $106,000 ($33,000) $1,259,100
Parks and Recreation
Salaries and Wages
Regular $359,550 $60,000 - $419,550
Operating Supplies
General 4,000 10,000 14,000
Street Maint. Materials 42,200 23,000 65,200
Prof. Services - General 3,500 10,000. 13,500
Prof. Services
Instructors 35,545 5,000 40,545
Insurance 23,320 5,000 28,320
Other Contractual Service 18,000 10,000 28,000
Department Totals $958,.410 $123,000 $1,081,410
Tree Conservation
Salaries and Wages -
Regular $32,660 ($8,000) $24 660
Department Totals $74,600 ($8,000) $66,600
Contingency
Transfer to Reserves $111,920
Department Totals $111,920--
General Fund Totals
$7,389,6.30 $715,090
($111,920)
($111,920)
0
($364,020) $7,740,700
1987 BUDGET ADJUSTMENTS
FEBRUARY 23, 1988
PAGE FIVE'
To balance the increased appropriation level of $7,740,000, I am recommending
the following increases to revenue estimates:
ORIGINAL REVISED
ACCOUNT ESTIMATE ADJUSTMENT ESTIMATE
Building Permits $603,750 $15,000 $618,750
Electrical Permits 75,400 75,000 150,400
Plumbing Permits 37,700 25,000 62,700
Mechanical Permits 56,400 45,000 101,400
Sign Permits 2,500 20,000 22,500
Police Town Aid 81,200 35,000 116,200
Building Permit Surcharge Rebate 45,000 25,000 70,000
Interest Earnings 50,000 111,070 174,020
Revenue Totals $7,389,630 $351,070.: $7,740,700
I am estimating that total actual revenues will be approximately $7,945,000
and that total expenditures will be approximately $7,740,700 which generates a
favorable variance or fund balance increase of approximately $200,000.
The adjustments relate first to theimplementation of comparable worth which
was not budgeted within the operating departments and, secondly, to the
increased size and magnitude of the General Fund operations. Again, only
limited conclusions should be drawn from the line items listed above and a
detailed comparison of the operating statements would be necessary to analyze
specific line item variances.
Please let me know if you would like any additional information or if you
would like to discuss this matter.
Finance Director/City Clerk
EJV/j eh
,c°1
GENERAL FUND
EXPENDITURES
T0 4 o o L-1 i
, o ,. r
c, co r on
4
•
S•
t t:
N 1(I
4N 0 1
H
z
GENERAL GOVER
c�-
C'1,
• .
ra C n•
as c- a
_ •
1 <i lam. h
o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
CO U1 4- ti CD 0, C] Lfl
N 0 m 010t0j..-
^
OD 0 0I LI\. N OI CO
00.- Nrak
•
,rl
c•
' - 5
VD O o N W o Ill O'
�
N O
O
• ti 10 ti
LPO 01 Ol,--0'
01 4- 01 00 , a1
m 01 ..-
ccs+
c- c� S vo- I
t
c C _I
�1 _Vl-9y•
^
— r' ce .
-9 , n•
• 0
O
00
00
01
10
44
CC
n
00
ti
0-
O
44,
0N0c0 e- LUNO. - .0
N
cl1 10 CT. 01 00 (0) c0
01-01 .- M c) '
▪ a1 0- O O1 CO 10
m r CO
q • bo
0
r1 l
4-) '0
N' L'4
H 5 a
U 0 NI
• � .Y,. O
o t,-0 0 07
y) ).. � Lal
0. 0 rHi (4 -
T 4-) 0 0 cd 0 .0
'd cd •rl 1)) r( 0) cd
ON P`l: (0 10 ap 0, o
0 o O o o O
PUBLIC SAFETY
O o 0 0 0
111..'01 .7 0l
00 ,-lfl10
00 00 .- N
• L1\ 0-
N
44
0 00 Ntom
N l
CT VD 00
O O VD O O
[SCO VD CD 01
00,-00 ,-01
VD 01 00
44
44
CV
- 00 Ul 10
-9
9
- CV
043
ul
.ti
Ol
N
m
N
44
$ 2,089,973
C.cl
0
-A,
W 1)0
Ol c
o co
N 0
cn
N ti
[-N -
^ O
00
m Illi
1 44
PUBLIC WORKS
c?()
I
O_
L-
`
0
Ln
N
0
44.
O
00
m
c0
0
,-1
C.
a)
0 CO
•60 al
W 60
,m.-
od) .HH
,-4 a1) 00
.0 i. W
D +). 14
a CO
cV
a
o 0
• O
0 VD
00
00i r
43
7.38
Ol0-
ao 00
N
- O
.• 0-
10
Recreation
0
0
01
00
43
10
00
CM
Va
0
0
0
0
o 0
Cr,MJ
O1
44 +4
0
0 0
44. 44
m 1CV I
01 I
•4- J
0
0
0
0
0
Utl
Cry
ice.
:$ 7,389,630
1n
111
CO
LII
49.
H
H
2
,-1 W
4 Dao
0 W
fz-
0) C D
U 0 Wo
.
0) ,{
co Z
o
41
aH U
0
C4 1 .-1
N
m• m H 14• 0
1 H
Agenda Information Memo
March 1, 1988, City Council Meeting
GAMBLING LICENSE/FARMINGTON KNIGHTS OF COLUMBUS
B. Gambling License for Farmington Knights of Columbus --The
Knights of Columbus,. Farmington, have requested a "bingo only"
gambling license for a location at Richard's Food and. Liquor at
4185 South Robert Trail The 30 day time consideration for the
City ends on March 12, 1988, so the Council must approve or deny
the application at this regular meeting.
For City Council information, there is currently a pull -tab
gambling at Richard's, operated by St. Joseph's Home for Children
of Minneapolis.
A Police investigation is required for each gambling _-license.
Our Police Department has..not.had adequate time to complete its
investigation and therefore the item is continued until the March
15, 1988, City Council meeting. According to the Director of
Finance/City Clerk, the City has acquired an additional week to
make their findings and, therefore, the 30 -day expiration
scheduled for March 12 by the State Gambling Commission has been
extended allowing the City Council action at its next City
Council meeting.
A copy of the application and Police Department findings will be.
distributed with the next City Council packet.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve a continuance
of the gambling license for the Farmington Knights of Columbus to
the next regular City Council meeting to be held on March 15,
1988. .
3i
,Agenda Information Memo
City Council Meeting March 1, 1988
AMENDMENT TO CITY CODE
C. Amendment to City Code for Terms of City Commission and
Size of Advisory Parks & Recreation Commission --The City Attorney's
office has completed a draft of a proposed ordinance amendment
that 1) establishes the size of each commission/committee and
2) the length of terms each commission or committee members
can serve on any commission or- committee. For a copy of the
ordinance amendments, refer to a proposed draft ordinance enclosed
on pages 3 15through,3 J
It is suggested that ad hoc committees, such as the Solid Waste
Abatement and other committees such as a committee to examine
the feasibility of a community center be excluded by this amendment
action. The City Council should -reserve their right to appoint
special ad hoc study groups, again using the example of solid
WasteAbatement and a study group for the community center,
and maintain the -right to establish a time duration forthe
study group. - .and expand the size of the committee beyond the
seven and one alternate asdefined in the ordinance amendment.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the
ordinance amendment to Section 2.50, 2.51 and 2.52 as presented
by the`City Attorney's office with or without modification. -
ORDINANCE NO. , 2ND SERIES
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EAGAN, MINNESOTA, AMENDING EAGAN CITY
CODE, CHAPTER 2, ENTITLED "ADMINISTRATION AND GENERAL GOVERNMENT" BY
AMENDING SECTION 2.50, 2.51 AND 2.52 REGARDING THE NUMBER OF TERMS
FOR COMMISSION MEMBERS AND BY ADOPTING BY REFERENCE, EAGAN CITY CODE
CHAPTER 1 AND SECTION 2.99.
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EAGAN DOES ORDAIN:
Section 1. Eagan City Code, Chapter 2, is hereby amended by
revising Sections 2.50, 2.51 and 2.52 to read:
SECTION. 2.50. ADVISORY COMMISSIONS AND COMMITTEES
GENERALLY. All Advisory Commission and Committee appointments
authorized by ordinance or resolution shall be made by the
Council at the second regular meeting in January of each year,
or at such other time as determined by the Council, and such
appointments confirmed prior _to the expiration of the existing
terms. .The term of each appointee shall be established and
stated at the time of his or her appointment, and terms of
present Commission and Committee members may be established, and
changed or terminated o as to give effect to this Section.
Each Commission or Committee shall be composed of seven regular
members who shall serve staggered (2 or 3 members subject to
appointment each year) three-year terms, unless otherwise
required by Statute, Code or resolution. However, no member may
serve more than 3 consecutive three -yea t terms or more than nine
. ,
consecutive years on any one Commission or Committee. An eighth
member shall be appointed to each Commission or- Committee as an
alternate for a period of one year and shall have all of the
powers and duties of a Commission or Committee member during the
absence -or disability of a regular member. New appointees. shall
assume office at the first meeting of- the Commission or
Committee after appointment. Pfev4de47 However, that all
appointees to Commissions and Committees shall hold office until
their successors is are appointed and qualified.
All vacancies
shall be filled in the same manner as for an expired term, but
the appointment shall be effective immediately when made and
only for the unexpired term. No appointed Commission or
Committee member shall be an employee of the City, but an ex
officio member may be so employed. All appointed Commission and
Committee members shall serve without remuneration, but may be
reimbursed for out-of-pocket expenses incurred in the
performance of their duties when such expenses have been
authorized by the Council before they were incurred. The
chairman and Secretary shall be chosen from and by the
Commission and Committee membership to serve for the current
year. Any .Commission or Committee member may be removed by the
Council for misfeasance, malfeasance or nonfeasancein office.
and his or her position filled as any other vacancy. Each
Commission and Committee shall hold its regular meetings at a
time established and approved annually by the Commission or
Committee. All members shall be residents of the City. The
City Administrator shall be an ex officio member of all
Commissions and Committees; provided, that if he or she may be
represented by his or her assistant or some person duly
authorized by him or her. One of the members shall be ars
Councilmatimember or the Mayor. All Commissions and -Committees
shall act as advisory to -the Council. Except as otherwise
provided, this Section shall apply to all Commissions and
Committees.
SECTION 2.51. ADVISORY PLANNING. COMMISSION
Subd. 1. Establishment. an4--eempeeit4en: An
Advisory Planning Commission
is hereby established. .The
cemn4ss}en--shall- be-eempesed-e€-seven-feEjalaf-membe r-whe
shall-serve-saggefed-theee-yeaf-eams:--An--e-i hh-=ffleffiber
e€--the--eemm4se4en--shall--be--a0pe4nted--te--sefve--as-ah
I tetnat:e--whe-shall-have-all-e-the-pewefe-a►d-qua}es-e-a
eeminlselen-tem'ee -da ing•-the--eheenee--e--dlsablllty--e€-a
eeguIef-meffie - ..
SECTION 2.52. ADVISORY PARK AND RECREATION COMMISSION.
Subd. 1. Establishment_ and-Eempeslten: An Advisory
Park and Recreation Commission is hereby established. The
eeff isslen-shall-be-eempesed-e€-ten-membes-whe-shall-sef.ve
e.tac gefee?--thfee-yeae--Left s- The Director of Parks and
Recreation, by reason ofhis position shall be an ex
officio member.
Section 2. Eagan City Code Chapter 1, entitled General
Provisions and Definitions applicable to the entire City Code
including "Penalty for Violation" and Section 2.99 entitled
"Violation,. a Misdemeanor"are hereby adopted in their entirety, by
reference,- - as though repeated. verbatim.
Section 3. Effective Date. This ordinance shall take effect
upon its adoption and publication according to law.
ATTEST CITY OF EAGAN
CITY COUNCIL
By:
Its Clerk Its Mayor
Date. Ordinance -Adopted: January 19, 1.988
Date Ordinance Published in the legal newspaper;.
3S
Agenda Information Memo
City Council Meeting March 1, 1988
BLACRHAWK POND ADDITION
D. Site Plan Review With Modifications, Comprehensive Guide Plan
Amendment, Rezoning from R-4 to R-1, Preliminary Plat for Blackhawk
Pond Addition and a Variance- for a Cul -De -Sac --A public hearing
was held before the Advisory Planning Commission at theirlast
regular ,meeting held on January 26, 1988, to consider a planned
development amendment, rezoning from R-4 to --R-1, a preliminary
plat consisting of 50 single-family lots on 36.6 acres referred to
as Blackhawk Pond Addition and a variance for a cul-de-sac in
excess of 500 feet as submitted_by the Meritor Mortgage Company.
The Advisory Planning Commission is recommending approval of all
applications including the variance for the cul-de-sac.
For additional information on this -item, refer to the Planning
Engineering Department's report, a copy is enclosed on pages
through ,S)
nd
For a copy of the Advisory Parks _and Recreation Commission action,
refer to page f5/ .
For a copy of the Advisory Planning Commission action on this
item, refer to page(s)
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny 1) a
comprehensive guide plan amendment,- 2) a rezoning from R-4 to R-1,
3) preliminary plat referred to as Blackhawk Pond Addition, and 4)
a variance to exceed the 500 foot requirement for a cul-de-sac.
Special Note: The APC minutes for this item will be included
with the Additional Information packet on Monday, February 29,
MEMO TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
DALE C. RUNKLE, CITY PLANNER
JIM STURM, PLANNER. 1
FEBRUARY 8, 1988
BLACKHAWK POND ADDITION
On January 26, 1988, the _Advisory Planning Commission approved
thisplat consisting of 49 single family lots on 36.6 acres west
of Hwy. 35-E. Since that time, the developer has proposed a
modification to the plat that will shorten the long cul-de-sac
and eliminate three lots. This change requires review by the
Advisory Planning Commission prior to City Council action. This
plan demonstrates an even greater regard for this heavily wooded
and rolling site. Other than house pad grading, there will be no
disturbance to the area directly adjacent to Hwy. 35-E.
Original Plan
49
14,000 S.F.
58,000 S.F.
1.6 Units/Acre
Lots
Smallest Lot
Largest Lot
Net Density
Revised Plan
46
15,000 S.F.
151,300 S.F.
1.4 Units/Acre
Stovepipe Lot 17, Block 1, will need to be widened from 34' to
50' at the right-of-way line to meet R-1 code requirements.
Minor lot line shifting can accomodate this prior to the final
plat approval. No variance will be necessary.
The original staff report and .revised conditions have been
attached for your review.
Planner 1
ENGINEERING COMMENTS:
Since the preparation of the January 19, 1988 APC staff report,
the staff has been working with the applicant addressing the
concerns outlined in the January 19th report. The change °in the
lot and street configuration had little change in the.
requirements listed in the January 19th report. The need for
Condition No. 4 has been eliminated. A preliminary water quality
analysis has shown that the amount of runoff proposed to
discharge directly into Blackhawk Lake will have an insignificant
impact on the water quality of Blackhawk Lake.
N z
7-
0 cc
ccci
.• a
Y
0
iI
1.4
fi 01>e
1017.1
tJ er-toikoirP.4 x 7,T.40
T t� PTei ;•
r.*;S1•` 214 3-
•
.'M !.JXY ;,'+•f �s
I ;fi•rio,,. r.!.A,,0,wt1146• NWic raw+
"1'
.lila.:
il
iJ"
ij!
1
1
�'
fir}
II)
N.
: fr.
�4.'}r
1
0'II}
if
:.Sri
\
ail "
•
is
NY
�fi_�
,\_
•
-.'tk'
-
i
i'I^y,
-
f 1
a'
i'
, il-
f,
N z
7-
0 cc
ccci
.• a
Y
0
iI
1.4
fi 01>e
1017.1
tJ er-toikoirP.4 x 7,T.40
T t� PTei ;•
r.*;S1•` 214 3-
•
.'M !.JXY ;,'+•f �s
I ;fi•rio,,. r.!.A,,0,wt1146• NWic raw+
CITY OF EAGAN
SUBJECT: COMPREHENSIVE GUIDE PLAN AMENDMENT
PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AMENDMENT (REZONING)
PRELIMINARY PLAT
VARIANCE — BLACKHAWK POND ADDITION
APPLICANT: MERITOR DEVELOPMENT COMPANY
LOCATION: N 1/2 OF SECTION 21
EXISTING ZONING: R-4 (WITHIN THE BLACKHAWK PARK PD)
DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: JANUARY 26, 1988
DATE OF REPORT: JANUARY 19, 1988
REPORTED BY: PLANNING AND ENGINEERING DEPARTMENTS
APPLICATIONS: Separate applications have been submitted
requesting a Rezoning of 36.6 acres zoned R-4 within the
Blackhawk Park PD to an R-1 district, and a Preliminary Plat for
the Blackhawk Pond Addition containing 49 single-family lots
located along the west side of Highway 35E and south of Blackhawk
Park. A Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment will be necessary
since the January 1987 Land Use Plan designates this area D -III,
six to twelve units per acre. The Variance is for the cul-de-sac
in excess of five hundred feet.
SITE PLAN: 'Currently this steeply -sloped site is heavily wooded,
consisting primarily of oak, birch, and cherry. The large
ponding area near the south central portion of the site along the
freeway and rugged topography makes this site rather difficult to
develop. This layout ,with the long cul-de-sac is about the only
way any development can occur and it restricts grading in as many
areas as possible. Even though the site could accommodate
apartments nicely,__ like the Thomas Lake Pointe project, it has
limited v i s ab.i.l_i t_y__._f:r_om_: the -_f r e,ewa.y_. V_eh i c.0 l.a r-.ci.r_c u l a t i on would
also be a problem since all of the traffic would have to come
from the Conklin Road extension and Deerwood Drive. From that
standpoint, the limited access will create a strong neighborhood
cohesiveness and privacy.
The site will be platted into 49 buildable lots and two
outlots. Outlot B on the south will be used for a road
connection through the Leo Murphy property on the west to the
park on the north. Outlot A on the north side of the main loop
road near the center of the site has an existing storm sewer line
underneath it. It will provide pedestrian access into the park
and trail system.
The net density of this subdivision is 1.6 units per acre. These
lots vary in size from 14,00.0 SF to 58,000 SF and average
27,050 SF. All are at Least eighty-five feet wide at the setback
line. Meritor has not yet determined whether these lots will be
sold to a select number of builders or if_ they will be available
to the general public for custom home sites.
GRADING/DRAINAGE/EROSION CONTROL: The proposed grading plan for
Blackhawk:Pond provides for cuts of 20' +/- on the easterly edge
of the development and fills of up to 12' +/- near the westerly
edge of Pond BP -29. Pond BP -29 is a designated storm water
ponding -area in the City of Eagan's Comprehensive Storm Sewer
Plan. The proposed filling of Pond BP -29 along its westerly and
northwesterly edges is permissible. Adequate storage volume._ is
maintained even though a partial filling of Pond BP -29 is
proposed.
The proposed grading plan provides for street grades of 0.50
minimum to a maximum of 12%. City Code states that for a local
type street "street grades wherever feasible shall not exceed 8%
with due allowance for reasonable vertical curves". *In reviewing
the quote "reasonable" of the proposed 12% street grade, there
does not appear to be a feasible alternative way to provide
street access to the proposed site and minimize the impact on the
existing topography.
The development is required to provide adequately sized storm
sewer to intercept approximately 10 CFS of flow from the
northerly terminus of Conklin Lane and provide a 3 CFS storm
sewer stub to the westerly adjacent property. The discharge from
the Conklin Lane system presently flows overland and is causing
severe erosion problems.
'A small ponding area is required in the vicinity of Lots 6-11
between the proposed park access road and the entrance to the
proposed site. Based on the proposed grading plan, controlling
the NWL of the ponding area at 316 results in a HWL of 820.5
giving an outflow rate of 4 CFS into Pond BP -29. An emergency
Overland drainage swale which minimizes the potential flooding
impact of the homes adjacent to this small ponding area is
required between this pond and Pond BP -29.
A detailed analysis of the drainage area tributary to Pond BP -29
has resulted in storage volume requirements of approximately 21
acre feet. The required storage volumes can be provided by
maintaining the existing controlled NWL at 809.7 and providing
for storage to a HWL of 818.0. An appropriate overflow outlet
from Pond BP -29 to Pond BP -2 is required. This emergency
overflow outlet will minimize the potential impact to the
proposedhomes adjacent to Pond BP -29.
The 21 acre feet storage volume requirements for Pond BP -29
adequately handles storm water runoff from a quantitative
standpoint. The water quality of the site generated runoff .needs -
to be analyzed because of this site's proximity to Blackhawk
Lake. Water quality concerns prevent allowing any site generated
runoff to discharge directly into Blackhawk Lake. The most
easterly proposed cul-de-sac will be required to drain into Pond
BP -29. The development will be responsible for developing a
water treatment system which reduces the postdevelopment
phosphorus loading to predevelopment levels. A detailed water
quality analysis of the wet pond volumes of Ponds BP -29, BP -2 and
the small ponding_area along the westerly edge of this site may
produce favorable water quality results.
A preliminary erosion and sediment control plan was submitted as
a part of this application. Plans submitted did not adequately
address two major issues resulting from the proposed site
development. The two major areas of concern are the
restabilization of steep cut and fill slopes proposed onsite; the
other is minimizing the potential for sedimentation in Blackhawk
Lake. The potential impact on Blackhawk Lake from both a water.
quality and an erosion/sediment control standpoint are required
to be adequately addressed prior to issuance of a grading permit
for site development.
SANITARY SEWER/WATERMAIN
Sanitary sewer of sufficient size but insufficient depth to
adequately serve the site is available along the easterly
boundary of the site adjacent to I -35E. Proposed site.
development is such that sanitary sewer lift station construction
is required to serve this site. The development is required to
provide a sanitary sewer service stub to the westerly boundary of
the site in a location and depth whichprovides maximum
flexibility for the potential development of the westerly
adjacent property.
Water main of sufficient capacity and pressure to serve this site
is proposed to be constructed under a City contract during the
summer of 1988. Proposed first floor house elevations below 865
will require pressure reducing valves.
STREETS/ACCESS/CIRCULATION: Access to this site is available in
one location from Conklin Lane. The development proposes street
widths and cul-de-sac radii in .accordance with City Code
requirements.
EASEMENTS/RIGHTS-OF-WAY/PERMITS: Based on the preliminary
grading plan submitted as a part of this preliminary plat
application, storm water ponding easements for this small ponding
area between the proposed park road and the proposed entrance
road and Pond BP -29 are required to HWL's of 820.5 and 818.0,
respectively. The development will be responsible for providing.
all the appropriate utility easements for utility lines which
are not constructed within public right-of-way.
The development shall be responsible for ensuring that all
regulatory agency permits are acquired in the appropriate time
frame as required by the affected agency.
ASSESSMENTS: The parcel proposed for platting has previously
been assessed for sanitary sewer and storm sewer trunk under..
projects 88 and 257, respectively. .
There are no pending assessments of record at the present time,
but project 523 is under consideration at this time by the City
and will generate a lateral from trunk water main assessment_. when
approved.
The following assessments are proposed in accordance with present
special assessment policies as a condition of final plat
approval:
DESCRIPTION. PROJ # RATE QTY AMT
Water Area Trunk 523 $1,315/ac 31.7 ac $41.,686
Lateral Benefit From
Storm Sewer Trunk 257 41.65/1f 780 if 32,487
Lateral Benefit From
Sanitary Sewer Trunk 372 31.70/ff 200 ff 6,340
TOTAL PROPOSED ASSESSMENT $80,513:
The final assessment obligations will be calculated based on the
finalplat areas and dimensions and the rates in effect at the
time of final plat approval.
CONDIT-IONS BLACKHAWK POND: lei°-'iG Zii'7
1. These standard conditions of plat approval as adopted by
Council -action on September 15, 1987 shall be complied with:
B-1, B-2, B-3, B-4, C-1, C-2, C-5, D-1, E-1, F-1,
and G-1.
2 The development will be responsible for providing an
adequately sized storm sewer to intercept the storm water
flow from the northerly terminus of Conklin Lane.
3. The development will be responsible for providing a 3 CFS
capacity storm sewer stub to the westerly adjacent property.
4. No site generated storm water runoff will be allowed to
discharge directly into Blackhawk Lake.
5. The development will be responsible for providing the
appropriate emergency overflow outlets for the small ponding
area on the -westerly side - of the property and. for Pond BP -
29.
6. -.The development will be responsible for developing a storm
water. treatment system .which reduces the postdevelopment
phosphorous loading levels to predevelopment levels..
7. Th development will be responsible for providing a sanitary
sewer service stub -to the westerly boundary.of this site in
a location and at a depth which provides maximum flexibility
for potential development of the westerly adjacent property.
STANDARD CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL
A. Assessments
1. This development shall accept its additional assessment
obligations as defined in the staff's report in
accordance with the final plat dimensions and the rates
in effect at the time of final plat approval.
Easements and Rights -of -Way
1. This development shall dedicate 10' drainage and utility
easements centered over all common lot lines and adjacent
to private property or publid•right-of-way.
2. This development shall dedicate, provide, or financially
guarantee its proportionate share of the acquisition
costs of additional drainage, ponding, and utility
easements- as required by the alignment, depth, and
storage capacity of all required public utilities and
streets located beyond the boundaries of this plat or
outside .of dedicated public right-of-way as necessary to
service this development.
3. This development shall dedicate all public right-of-way
and temporary slope ease;nents for ultimate -development of
adjacent roadways as required by the appropriate
jurisdictional agency.
4. This development shall ded-icate adequate- drainage and
ponding easements to incorporate the required high water
elevation necessitated -by City storm water storage volume
requirements.
C. Plans and Specifications
1. All public streets and utilities necessary to provide
service to this development shall be designed by a
registered professional engineer in accordance with City
codes and engineering standards and policies, and
approved by staff prior to final plat approval.
2. A detailed grading,- drainage, erosion, and sediment
control plan must be prepared in accordance with current
City standards and approved by staff prior to final plat -
approval.
3. Thisdevelopment shall insure that all temporary dead end
public streetsshall have a cul-de-sac constructed, -in
accordance with City engineering standards.
4. A detailed landscape plan shall be submitted on the
proposed grading plan and approved by staff prior to the
final plat approval. The financial guarantee shall be
included in the Development Contract and not released
until one year after the date of installation.
STANDARD CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL
PAGE TWO
5. _All.. internal.public and private streets shall be
constructed within the required right-of-way in
accordance with City design standards.
D. Public Improvements
1. If any public improvements are to -be installed under a
City contract, the appropriate project must be approved
.ny Council action prior to final plat approval.
E. PenAts
1. This development shall be responsible for the acquisition
of all regulatory agency permits in the time frame
required by .the affected agency.
F. Parks Dedication
1. .This development shall fulfull its parks dedication
requirements as recommended by the Advisory Parks and
Recreation Commission and approved by Council action.
G. Other
1. All standard platting and zoning conditions shall be
adhered to unless specifically granted a variance by
Council action.
Advisory Planning Commission City Council
Approved;,.. August 25-,_1987 September 15, 1987
Re-viSed:
LTS#2
STANDARD
a'4
ZONING
.-LOCATION
LAND USE
r7nb�(F. 1, '11;1A4
c04/4t
I SDAAla !, •.4i
w„a
fAO,
MUNle
GENr
orS-.Fr4000 _ __
�t19
i;
1
rv:�nroc it
0.
In 1
.,
f,,, 1 CP -7 7
76 5.0 , ' /
./4--- - - -
: . . 769.4.: „ • >:01
I .
I
'flt‘'
`,..,•,
/ ,,' •-• <5,, • ,.
t 730061:72
\
\
796.32
/ 802,4 -
& ,
. )
/
I A- f •
4,
/ \4-h AP -38
/ 839.8 •
823.5
829.7
CP -I2
826.5
829.6
A- bbb
. .818.a
6
:TCN \
4...... ..1.1.
• • , _;-, B P - 30 "...*...,,,
,'. I - ,.:,,!.:;. • 800.0 . .. i .... - '''''!....:,""'"‘""'"
- k ' ..„ . . ,
, .
.,. ,....,...: ,
. ,
CP- I 1
795.0
808.1
,..1
825.0
829.7,- -
. [a! JP -2--`-<,
ti 844.0
- , 851.5
• a.m....ea
111 JP -6
871
880
JP -3
844.0
8472 ,•• (
“2:•;;,- '
790.3 '
801.0 - • ,
. .
24' 8j4P:1-.40
1 •
‘,.; • ‘•1/2....\ 846.5.
• I
JP -5
8 2 3:8 • • • i •
834,01; •
1!1
fp,
,•
818.
B 6
- 28
568:0
lit .6: 36
JP -36
870.6
873.2 866-:
r) ---12;----t" AP.13,7; ...:::::'..-
„,\:•(, 44'4, 41`?".'"""""- 1'1.1,61,1: .•'. ,;, I
- , •-,-,-.^ -,-. C'r .".i
-b03.6
'
- I
. • '. . •• • l • -i • -,- --
• • -,14,-p ..„,,,..,:,,:•.,j I ,
A- k • 5076 ...:;'' :::' . i'„H.
:,.:-. ; -,-,, [:.:. ,....:- [-_-I_ :1 3•:( • . -:', ‘...'i
,. ,
• ‘,... '••,•'•..., • i i i 11! ,- 1
•,., , '
5,4"'. \ ;-' , \ -••••, '„;...- • •:::,, 1 I ' A-11 1
• , ,;_ ""1::,,i'l ••- ) p••:. • -.' r 1 BP -29
.,' 11----c:C.! 1-'--'V' '- ':'1 1 t. 809.7 •
818.0
,866.6...._-_, fi..... .,.,._., ,
1
..A....,..,,,,._ [L.I...1.„, .-,...1/2.
,. P-.2".31,.• - 11A 1, ..)'•1:,,A
8663;-;:‘4 1.;" : r.111 1-1,
‘ BP -33 ...•
i,6%--.1--•-•::1 1 ! 111'2711 ' i A"'s • i, 886.0 -
A -r ,..,,. ,-... , --
1:-..-.::',.- 895.2
•
city of eagan
PUBLIC
WORKS
DEPARTMENT
RP -3
STORM SEWER
MASTER PLAN
36"
FIG. #1
approved:
standard
plate.#:
1
aste
ssion
t
4
"
i j : t•:) ; I
1 ' ' ! 1 ka...iiiaiiiimilaliiiii.10 1414811111 '
/ C -.- DIf
. ::
•/ . 1
2
• ,...,:.
ii / : /
,
/
..,..
-..:1136 / /
4 ‘...24
/
• • •-- ' •;A:,-., -.. - . .. ;II J...... „II_ .. v... 11 C— E / C - G
/ 2'• ;,; .; -1,,c)-t,- • •
•,‘
) s
--,
W- B -
, 1
/ "; I .......
II !1-
/ (5)1•••
r. ' .,..:rd t. '• ,. ,....,A0: 36 • -
14-1-......._
. _ ..
•
or
18"
_4 -,..Ajc?. •
—4-140A6a4L);;•
L• ,
. ,
• •
• .
D'-- —
------ • __..,,,,,,,._. •11.4. •••••;•••.k. (,..',
' - • • 11 .•','.(• . _,, , , , i
• • . • ( L•s• '.•c / '- --.•, 11
,...„..' ... :!...1'!„ .. . '• • . . H..
1 ;-•kh--•••‘!:islahl , ', ... j 1
'''' ...• .• l•- I
, i . . /.... irmrs -77 .---......-.-;-•
i,. :- ,,,.,....:. • ..1,•". ,...11.'-i,:•:7•!•.; H- .".'.:".''."1
. • ..i.' ••••....... ‘- ..1 - L-
' , • ji .
',1 .:•
I5" W ;.• • : -, t...., I -ki ., •,-; • - . ri
Li
1,. ,..i) ; -j ; ,--it -,-;-;;• 1
• • t • -•••• 1 : - : ,-,,
.• .
it -
11 1 W — G - -•
•..;t It
aci
W- H
.. E '
s L. — ii
I 1."" 1 s- , 1 • ' ' " ' i
. ,
•
ammo. .;..mhbaqh/
- /
1 !
woo ammo. ••••••••4
i • :, ,7 j ;
''!"• r... -'_i ;
1
C—
C -J
ink
man.. .•••••• .•.•••• aro. lomme rum,. 444.1
C- K
:4,1r -4-i44"0"1".'muuL,A
SUBJECT PARCEL
city of eagan
PUBLIC
WORKS
DEPARTMENT
SANITARY SEWER
MASTER PLAN
approved:
city of eagan
PUBLIC
[_ WORKS
\ DEPARTMENT
SUBJECT PARCEL
SANITARY SEWER
MASTER PLAN
FIG. #2
approved:
standard
plate 4:
b) / ' N..,O\ ..
8O8
7/1
\1 (-7_30(32siimTi.E,G.Dx4f.i
:;. /
1060TREATMENT g
,.,-
It.){1"7/,ri/4l1,1.li
L
+ 688/84.0 PLANT 3? 4T11 \0L)
, , i54
itEIHIS8-.„i
(6‘/ 1 ,
,
,
75,1/ 92.0 ...• • 0 56.2/67..43T/ -,,. IAD 1
,'
i
i30" ! //,' /' .e -tr., • ,
. I.
, •;'•," / ,..1. •'1,'"-I',
69.5/8740
J ,
t i 55,3 /.700' i 60.3/.75
1. - i I ; • I 1 . I (C33) 01
tV/ ;
; _
,/ • 1 a" 1
'-,30" QP.i) I 30-::7!
. 60.4/ 7a.0 „..,-/,',
1 97"-4-.,..:,:".: - t •
.• -';.
' m'184`)' '.„--,-,
I 1;pr'l , \
'Ij 2'....Ni
,
\,:.„: 8 4 . 7 / 9 8 . 0 !,
:
.
• ..- : / i 3
i: , a ( ) 1 i I
- /
/ i
• ,
' 4 12 ‘V--..; ':.:,.-----,
18 / :: ,/...z.z. - •
1- - 7
iy.I.M.,•101): 1 :
. . , . • ,.,', Gala& WW1 isoirl Qua. Iiiiiiiitk-.4adlir &WO - CIAO, Ural, 6111.1k3 -415 6.6 / 72
. -• II 1 O Fr1, 1 FA. . vi,`,.'! ..,,3
•. 100 .:...,
,
I ....,7: . • -
V I‘.4)1L:
/ 61.0
• /
•
i 'ARK
59.8/
60.0
5/74.0
1950 I
., .. .!: 59,5/(.1.1§%.4I',.. 1 . -
.a< „
' 76.0 „.I I 6.01I1 - .F-..). ei 1 L i:4•i
q ----,"'r-II I ,,,,,LA / 1 i• •
\)
,),...i.,%‘•.:-_-____,,,,-;• , k..•
-7,--:.:-" \\: \•'` bl .44-+ I \ - '
64.3 / 84.0 ,..-1:11.z'';1-.,,,,:•,,r \,..,<•••:‘,.'''
. ,s •Y ' ''''-N
\',1 -/'• II
•-••••- -• 'k‘ s•••• 1 ..0. % ' •
56.2/77.0 , kki,I ' - - ;2.311;141111011111t
I •
I 11TII‘ ,-, ,> .ii
78, 7/ 96.0
131.Aci(HAVVK
PARK.
; ; •,•
,
fill• TT'
L.; 1..'
..‘)‘r:,- I 1
ILL
•
i i18''
5 1. 7 / 67.0
fl 105 53
,
:17 1
*
. .•... •
"
::::::::::::
.•.•... ...•... .• .;•. .• • ,
.• 2-
•
wimp
,
I.
000 ......
-121
518'' 1
.. rigorIltimpTstaiire -foe syslIalishisMarreg
,4444, • 7.-+J" 5 2.6/.67.0 ; •••••• c; ; 20 59.
••,:- GROUND STORA
• 2G4En'\20/./410 1 86.0," 3
44.6/59.0 ii16"
_
I71.W.V )059
1020
21.8 / 3 I. 0 j0)
4.40 Q62)
<POI'
40,0
88.5/ 8 2. 8!,9,,4.0 off)
100.0 ,
0 r §.4/107.0 I 5(.0/ q5.0
1 2 u (,..1-1I
r
38.3/94.0
81.0
i
• • •.• • • • •.• • -...• • • • •
•
:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:::::
SUBJECT PARCEL
FIG. +3
city of eagan
PUBLIC
WORKS
DEPARTMENT
WATER
MASTER PLAN
approved
standard
plate 4:
0
MEMORANDUM
TO: TOM HEDGES
10 FROM: KEN VRAA, DIRECTOR OF PARKS AND RECREATION
DATE: FEBRUARY 8, 1988
SUBJECT: BLACKHAWK POND ADDITION - ADVISORY PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION
RECOMMENDATION
At the Thursday, February 4, 1988 Advisory Parks and Recreation Commission
meeting, the Advisory Commission reviewed the proposed Blackhawk Pond
Addition. Although this preliminary plat application is within the Blackhawk
Park PUD, which has fulfilled it's parks dedication requirement, the Advisory
Commission reviewed this preliminary plat because of its proximity and impact
on the Blackhawk Community Park. A concern of the Advisory Commission was the
impact of this development on a future road access to the park and the affects
of storm water ponding.
Parks and Recreation staff reviewed with the Advisory Commission road access
issues and reconfirmed earlier decisions by the City Council and Advisory
Commission concerning access to the park.
The Advisory Parks and Recreation Commission has recommended to the City
Council the following:
1. That proposed Outlot A be accepted for parks purposes and an
eventual trail access.
2. For the development to dedicate Outlot "B" for a future park road
access to Blackhawk Community Park. Said outlot shall be
reconfigured in order to accomplish an engineered roadway.
Further, that any temporary road easement for grading purposes be
obtained from the developer, at this time.
Agenda Information Memo
City Council Meeting March 1, 1988
SITE PLAN REVIEW/CLIFF LAKE CENTER
PRELIMINARY PLAT
E. Site Plan Review and Revisions to Cliff Lake Center Preliminary
Plat for Ryan/Hoffman Development --In official action that was
taken by the Advisory Planning Commission at their last regular
meeting held on Tuesday, February 25, 1988, a public hearing
was held to consider the site plan and final revision to the
Cliff Lake Center preliminary plat for the Ryan/Hoffman develop-
ment. As a part of the December 17, 1987, City Council action,
the final site plan was referred back to the Advisory Planning
Commission for their review. The site plan reviewed and adopted
by the City Council at that December meeting was a modification
to the preliminary plat/site plan reviewed by the Planning Commis-
sion at its November 1987 meeting. The APC is recommending
approval. For additional information on this item, refer to
the Planning and Engine ring Department report, a copy is enclosed
on pages 53 through 6.
Advisory Planning Commission minutes will not be available until
the Administrative Agenda is circulated on Monday, February
29.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM. To approve or deny the
final site plan review and revisions to the Cliff Lake Center
preliminary plat.
CITY OF EAGAN
SUBJECT: REVISED PRELIMINARY PLAT/CLIFF LAKE
CENTER
APPLICANT: RYAN/HOFFMAN JOINT VENTURE
LOCATION: SW 1/4, SECTION 29, NE QUADRANT OF
RAHN ROAD AND CLIFF ROAD
EXISTING ZONING: EAGAN HILLS WEST PLANNED DEVELOPMENT
CSC/RB, LB, AND HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL
PLANNED USES
DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: FEBRUARY 25, 1988
DATE OF REPORT: ORIGINAL REPORT AUGUST 17, UPDATED
OCTOBER 19, UPDATED NOVEMBER 20, 1987
AND UPDATED FEBRUARY 18, 1988
REPORTED BY: PLANNING AND ENGINEERING DEPARTMENTS
APPLICATION: THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION SUBMITTED WAS FOR PRELIMI-
NARY PLAT APPROVAL CONSISTING OF APPROXIMATELY 99.9 ACRES AND
WOULD CONTAIN THREE LOTS CONSISTING OF APPROXIMATELY 27.9 ACRES
AND FOUR OUTLOTS CONTAINING 72.1 ACRES FOR FUTURE DEVELOPMENT
ZONING AND LAND USE. A REVISED PRELIMINARY PLAT HAS BEEN SUB-
MITTED CONTAINING THREE LOTS OF APPROXIMATELY 28.45 ACRES AND
THREE OUTLOTS CONTAINING 2.8 ACRES.
ZONING AND LAND USE: THE PROPERTY IS ZONED PD (PLANNED
DEVELOPMENT) UNDER THE EAGAN HILLS WEST PLANNED DEVELOPMENT CON-
SISTING OF APPROXIMATELY 384 ACRES. THE PORTION OF THE DEVELOP-
MENT WHICH LIES SOUTH OF THE NORTHERN STATES POWER EASEMENT CON-
TAINS APPROXIMATELY 99.9 ACRES AND ACCORDING TO THE EAGAN HILLS
WEST PLANNED DEVELOPMENT, DOES ALLOW FOR COMMERCIAL AND MULTIPLE
RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT IN THIS GENERAL AREA. ON DECEMBER 1ST
AND 17TH, APPROVAL WAS GIVEN TO THE COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN.
BRIEF SUMMARY: THE ORIGINAL PHASE ONE (RETAIL) SUBMISSION,
(EXHIBIT 1) DATED SEPT. 1987, CONTAINED A TOTAL OF 325,000 SQUARE
FEET OF RETAIL SPACE, ALL FALLING SOUTH OF A PROPOSED EAST -WEST
STREET PERPENDICULAR TO RAHN ROAD. THIS BROKE DOWN AS FOLLOWS:
SUPER'VALU STORE, 62,000 SQUARE FEET, PLUS A 10,000 SQUARE FOOT
FUTURE EXPANSION, 72,000 TOTAL SQUARE FEET; STRIP RETAIL, 110,000
SQUARE FEET; TARGET STORE, 114,300 SQUARE FEET; AND OUTLOTS CON-
TAINING 28,700 SQUARE FEET.
THE NEXT SUBMISSION, (EXHIBIT 2) DATED NOV. 1987, HAS A ROAD CON-
FIGURATION SIMILAR TO THAT IN EXHIBIT D, OF THE PLANNED DEVELOP-
MENT AGREEMENT. TOTAL RETAIL SPACE WAS REDUCED TO 278,000 SQUARE
1
,� 3
FEET; AS FOLLOWS: SUPER VALU TOTAL, 72,000 SQUARE FEET; STRIP
RETAIL, 79,700 SQUARE FEET; TARGET STORE, 114,300 SQUARE FEET;
AND OUTLOTS, 12,000 SQUARE FEET.
THE LATEST SUBMISSION, (EXHIBIT 3) DATED JAN. 1988, IS THE REVI-
SION OF THE DECEMBER 17, 1987 PLAN AS DIRECTED BY THE CITY COUN-
CIL. IT INCLUDES A COMPLETE REALIGNMENT OF RAHN ROAD. THE TOTAL
RETAIL SPACE HAS BEEN REDUCED FURTHER, TO 258,000 SQUARE FEET.
SUPER VALU, 67,000 TOTAL SQUARE FEET; STRIP RETAIL, 75,700 SQUARE
FEET; TARGET, 114,300 SQUARE FEET; AND ONE OUTLOT, 6,000 SQUARE
FEET.
BECAUSE OF THE NUMBER OF CHANGES THAT. CAME OUT OF THE DECEMBER
CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS, THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT RECOMMENDED A NEW
PUBLIC HEARING CONCERNING THESE REVISIONS.
THE SECOND PHASE OF THIS PROPOSAL HAS NOT CHANGED WITH THE EXCEP-
TION THAT IT WILL MEET THE IMPERVIOUS SURFACE GUIDELINES
REQUIRED BY THE ENVIRONMENTAL AGREEMENT REACHED IN JANUARY.
ALSO, THE BUILDINGS WILL BE AT A MAXIMUM HEIGHT OF FOUR STORIES
UNLESS OTHERWISE APPROVED
SITE PLAN REVIEW:
BY AGREEMENT, THIS DEVELOPMENT IS ALLOWED A MAXIMUM IMPERVIOUS
SURFACE TOTAL OF 70%. STAFF CALCULATIONS SHOW THE PROPOSAL TO
HAVE AN IMPERVIOUS SURFACE CLOSER TO 76%. STAFF CALCULATIONS DO
NOT INCLUDE RIGHT OF WAY (R.O.W.).
THE NEW PROPOSAL, WITH THE RAHN ROAD REALIGNMENT, APPEARS TO BE A
BETTER ALTERNATIVE; CONCERNING INTERNAL CIRCULATION.
PER THE CITY CODE, THERE IS ADEQUATE PARKING PROVIDED ON SITE.
THE PARKING SPACES ARE 10' BY 20°, AND THE DRIVE ISLES ARE 24';
BOTH MEET CITY CODE REQUIREMENTS. HOWEVER, THE PERCENTAGE OF IM-
PERVIOUS SURFACE COULD BE REDUCED BY REDUCING THE PARKING STALL
DIMENSIONS TO 9' BY 20°.
THE SETBACKS THROUGHOUT THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT MEET OR EXCEED
THOSE REQUIRED BY CITY CODE.
THE BUILDING LOT COVERAGE COMBINED IS 18%.
SEPARATE LOT COVERAGES:
LOT 1: 20.6%
LOT 2: 16.0%
LOT 3: 25.8%
2
OUTLOT C: 11.6%
WHERE A LOADING AREA FACES A PUBLIC STREET, A MINIMUM FORTY FOOT
WIDE LANDSCAPED YARD, INCLUDING BERMS, AND VEGETATION SHALL BE
PROVIDED AND MAINTAINED ALONG SAID PUBLIC STREET.
GENERAL PROVISIONS:
WHERE A LOADING AREA IS PROPOSED WITHIN 300 FEET OF ANY RESIDEN-
TIAL DISTRICT (THE SUPER VALU STORE IS WITHIN 300 FEET FROM A
RESIDENTIAL USE), THE CITY COUNCIL MUST ISSUE A CONDITIONAL USE
PERMIT FOR THE OFF-STREET LOADING AREA.
HOURS OF OPERATION ARE CONFINED BETWEEN 7:00 A.M. AND 1:00 A.M.
EXCEPT FOR BUSINESS' LOCATED 200 FEET OR MORE FROM ANY RESIDEN-
TIAL USE (THE SUPER VALU STORE IS LESS THAN 200 FEET FROM A
RESIDENTIAL USE) AND FRONTING ON A MAJOR THOROUGHFARE OR COMMER-
CIAL SERVICE ROAD. THE CITY COUNCIL CAN SPECIFICALLY APPROVE EX-
TENDED HOURS.
GRADING/DRAINAGE/EROSION CONTROL: The grading plan for the
proposed Cliff Lake Centre development can be separated into the
following segments:
1. The grading of the shopping center site and Cliff Lake
Centre Road between existing Rahn Road and the east line of
the Phase I development. In this section, retaining walls
are proposed to be constructed along Cliff Road right-of-way
(southeast of Target) and the east side of Target between
the service drive and Cliff Lake. No grading or filling is
proposed into Cliff Lake expect a small area in the
northwest corner which must be reviewed by the DNR.
2. The proposed grading of- Pond AP -25 requires the removal of a
portion of existing Rahn Road. Also included is the
extension of Rahn Road connecting to Cliff Lake Centre Road
north of Pond AP -25. A multi -residential building site is
proposed between the north side of Pond AP -25 and the
realigned portion of Rahn. Road. A drive and small parking
area northwesterly of Pond AP -25 extending southerly from
Rahn Road is proposed to serve Rahn Park. The proposed
removal of a portion of existing Rahn Road will not be
allowed. The existing Rahn Road road bed is to remain
intact for potential future use for Rahn Park.
3. The grading of Pond AP -24 located south of the Meadowland
Addition and east of Rahn Road. Pond AP -24 is proposed to
be located immediately east of the low point in Rahn Road
and south of the NSP easement.
4. The grading of Cliff Lake Centre Road from Blackhawk Road to
the east line of the proposed Phase I development. This
section of raodway must be built up to meet the existing
grade of Blackhawk Road.
The alignment and grade of Rahn Road and Cliff Lake Centre Drive
must conform to Municipal State Aid design standards.
Drainage from this site is being directed into five ponding areas
which are designated in the Comprehensive Storm Sewer Plan.
Listed below are the design assumptions used in determining the
storage .and outflow requirements from each of the designated
ponding areas:
1. Runoff from the commercial areas will not be allowed to
discharge directly into Cliff Lake(Pond AP -11).
2. The storm sewer outfall from Cliff Lake cannot discharge
into Pond AP -25. If the storm sewer outfall from Cliff Lake
is discharged into Pond AP -22, its existing outfall will
have to be reconstructed or upgraded. The storm sewer
outfall from Cliff Lake is required to discharge directly
into Pond AP -24.
3. Pond AP -25 will receive all the runoff from the shopping
center site and be constructed to provide acceptable. levels
of storm water treatment.
4. The size of Pond AP -25 must be limited to preserve
development between the pond and the south side of realigned
Rahn Road.
5. The future commercial property east of this development
between Cliff Lake and Cliff Lake Centre Road will discharge
directly into Pond AP -23. It is also assumed that the
existing storm sewer outfall from Pond AP -23 will not be
reconstructed or upgraded.
6. Pond AP -24 would be constructed adjacent to the low point in
Rahn Road and its outflow restricted to 22 cfs.
7. Pond AP -49 located in Rahn Park will remain landlocked with
no storm sewer outfall.
8. The outflow from Pond AP -50 will discharge directly into
Pond AP -25. It is also assumed that additional ponding area
will be required south of Cliff Road near Pond AP -50.
Based on the above assumptions, the following design
considerations are required:
POND DESIGNATION
DIRECT AREA (ACRES) STORAGE VOLUME (AC/FT) OUTFLOW (CFS)
Pond AP -ll (Cliff Lk) 21.0 83 6.55
Pond AP -22 24.5 21.3 5.0
Pond AP -23 39.1 29.6 5.5
Pond AP -24 35.5 5.2 22.0
Pond AP -25 58.3 28.0 3.31
Pond AP -50 41.1 9.8 2.0
Pond AP -50A 30.5 5.6 1.0
The storm sewer system receiving the runoff generated from the
low area immediately northwest of the proposed Target site is
required to discharge directly into the storm sewer serving the
Target parkinglot as opposed to discharging directly into Pond
AP -25.
The water quality impacts of site development can be reduced by
constructing a nutrient detention basin to treat storm water
runoff. Proposed storm water detention Pond AP -25 has sufficient
capacity to act as a nutrient trap. As shown on the grading
plan, Pond AP -25 has an area of approximately 2.25 acres at the
controlled water elevation. The construction of a wet pond
volume of approximately 6 acre feet below the controlled water
elevation will produce phosphorous removal efficiencies of about
65%. This removal rate is contingent upon the wet pond basin
having a mean depth of approximately 4'. Basin construction of
this design will minimize the water quality impacts of site
development on the downstream waterbodies including the
Minnesota River.
A preliminary Erosion/Sediment Control Plan was submitted for
review. Many erosion control issues on this site will be
s7
resolved or created by the schedule of grading utility
construction and building construction. Given the information on
the current plan, the following concerns were identified:
1. Retaining walls need to be constructed as a part of the
rough grading operation or shortly thereafter. The
location of the walls needs to be clearly marked on the
proposed plan.
2. The diversion dike located along the lake will require a
safe outlet. It appears that there are two low points along
the diversion that may require temporary outlets. Since
these areas will eventually be filled, the timing of grading
along the lake needs to be formalized to assess what
actually- will be required. Because of the extensive site
disturbance proposed, the details of the temporary berm
design need to be defined.
3. Seeding and mulching specifications need to be provided on
the proposed grading plan.
4. If construction is anticipated within the water of Cliff
Lake, a floatable silt curtain will be needed to limit
sediment movement into the lake.
A revised detailed erosion and sediment control plan is required
prior to issuance of a grading permit of final plat approval.
UTILITIES:
Trunk sanitary sewer of sufficent capacity and depth
to handle the first phase and ultimate development of this
property is immediately available along the western (Rahn Road)
and northern (NSP highline easement) boundary of this
development. Sanitary sewer lateral extensions and individual
service lines are adequately proposed to service the development.
Water service for this development presently does not exist. It
will require the installation -of a l6' trunk main from the
existingstub on Blackhawk Road to the existing trunk water main
at the intersection of Cliff and Rahn Road. A 12" diameter trunk
main must also be interconnected to the existing trunk water main
stub located in Beaver Dam Road at Shale Lane.
Due to the relocation of Rahn Road and the necessity for looping
a water main service through proposed Outlot B and D, the
installation of the water main in the location of the proposed
Rahn Road realignment will be required as a condition of Phase I
development.
STREETS/ACCESS/CIRCULATION: Access to this site is through a
proposed east/west roadway connecting Cliff Road, Rahn Road and
Blackhawk Road. The development is proposed a right-of-way width
(90'-105' wide) capable of accomodating a 4 -lane divided roadway
with landscaped medians, sidewalk and channelization for traffic
turning movements. Access to the proposed Phase I development
will be taken from Cliff Lake Centre Road in six locations.
The applicant has petitioned the City to design and construct
under a public improvement contract the proposed Cliff Lake
Centre Drive (including streetlights and signalization), Rahn
Road realignment, and all appropriate public utilities necessary
to serve the Phase I and ultimate site development. The roadway
design will be in accordance with Municipal State Aid (MSA)
design standards.
EASEMENTS/RIGHTS-OF-WAY/PERMITS: An 80' right-of-way is required
for the proposed realignment of Rahn Road. The development is
proposing to dedicate right-of-way for the construction of Cliff
Lake Centre Road. The right-of-way width in the area of proposed
Target parking lot and the intersection with Blackhawk are
subject to change based on detail design criteria.
Ponding easements will be required for all ponding areas
necessary to handle the surface water generated by the 1st
Phase and ultimate development. Internal utility easements will
be required for all sanitary sewer, storm sewer and water main
facilities servicing more than one potential user and/or
providing continuity to the City's trunk utility system.
All regulatory agency permits shall be acquired within the
appropriate time frame as required by the affected agency.
ASSESSMENTS: Proposed assessment obligations are as outlined in
the November 20, 1987, staff report. All final assessment
obligations will be calculated based on the quantities and
dimensions on the final plat in accordance with rates and special
assessment policiesin effect at the time of the final plat
approval.
CONDITIONS: CLIFF LAKE CENTRE
1. These standard conditions of plat approval as adopted by
Council action on September 15, 1987 shall" be complied with:
Al, Bl, B2, B3, B4, Cl, C2, C5, Dl, and Gl.
2. This proposal meets all requirements of the City, except for
those items found under "General Provisions". IF these items
are enforceable, the developer should modify the plans to bring
them into compliance with the City Code.
3. This proposal surpasses, by 6%, the 70% impervious surfaced agreed
upon.
4. The development shall be responsible for its proportionate
share -of any major roadway improvements to the overall*
transportation network system necessitated by either the 1st
Phase or ultimate site development.
5. The design of the proposed retaining wall construction must
be approved by City staff prior to issuance of a grading
permit.
6. The development shall comply with the most recent
requirements of the Standard Conditions of Plat Approval as
adopted by council action.
7. A detailed grading plan must incorporate Ponds AP -22, AP -23
and AP -24 in addition to Pond AP -11 (Cliff Lake) and AP -25
(Rahn Road) compatible with City approved storage volume
capacity requirements.
8. A specific detailed erosion and sediment control plan
necessary for the water quality protection of Pond AP -11
(Cliff Lake) must be approved by the City prior to any
construction activity initiation.
9.
The development is responsible for providing adequate right-
of-way width and alignment for proposed Cliff Lake Centre
Road as dictated by detail MSA design criteria.
. _
I ' ;
'
1
z1
—1
-t*
—1 7
•-••
• j .10,3 •
)) • -:•-••••5-7-47 • \(.!
,.„. A...% . •
'. • 1
EXHIBIT
, 1
! y ••, I. ..
, • •
,
71
• :**
. .
134.11.10 ! • • I : •
• ; •
.••,... ••••..........7„....„.:_„____
`.1,'••• • _._-:-_,./i: I n19:\i , si1;Ir,•••\'"I`..l. I ;.. c ,
• % ,;-....)-'r-% .4(r) -) . ; •cin A
• • ).•,
•--\ . •
:' ''..'•.. • i•N1)--,
, , '‘' •\
• .". '"• •..I'.',;,;i'.i..„ .:":_:"-,r••:,"_'...'. . .4; .,.I,"(Y)--I- -•Ik/o"-‘r--:---L-i,i...c''7\,.-(-.-..:-.7'---k-?--'• -",.'..'--•s_- •-...•, •-•".1_1•,:3. „.j-.-7( I
.r •-
.. • :<-"-,, %, -.r:•",,-/;•,Tr
-- .2
r,.
-,7
ii \9. , ,.1,:,:-. • '.------.‘,..__-.,,----.,-.. \ ''• .• .1 ,.- \X.,.../. .4- L.,:_c.c_.___,V.-:. :. izi 'f,c..\ /
s. ... •'1' '-.J.P' I-2(.;:)/••')(_>..../---7---..‘. " '' -,-,1•••*. l'''' ((:"-- -' . .1 X ;
i •:'.',. ...:..
1, •,-,+J ,,..r
- • i --4 --V '-'' 4. -. - -•=.- .-,,1‘..-•-• . - •-...._42,4"tf"•_:-,
) y
.-••••-••••••• T. • •••• : I
e-c_den • ,•
, , _-- • 1 -k) •
•It
! A
•/
: .5
IiI:4 (-
.1
4
) r
Er
I owd TL
1(2.4
, ;
' .1-••
/
, t
• • I. r./
• •
• -
1...
• I. /I
•
• - • 75,-._•„2••/„.,••••-..,,,
lor
. \ • - ---1-, .1 -'4(
i) 1 • -1 ' 1 '
; •
1.;•••,
t•-7; i'( C't
_ (
t ).
•
•••1,
• c_ t. •
q
;:-3::11:.•7‘;');11' ri..:''''.:1..j ('';';''
-. .,. n.... , • ,t ../ r7....'../
'',••: .--..:‘-'1'..7".-. ‘.--...t \ -:•:•:,4‘•it-r''''-',4
7 -:-.----:;,-;l,li-i-- - :.0.•.:,:._,4,-,14,,s
. • '1;7— ,
.:-.,.c..,.
. . )) ! 1 ',' , 7 . :•_,..-, ii ,,,., ..es. ,, . : ,‘ i..),,,._1,..„.s.,,,•„_c... :,:„..... ..,,...,i/ '
V • '
.7...--; oy•.- • • ...1, ,----i.
..;•.(1,!'...;/ fl) --.•••,.:,._-:.-•-•,2";:‘{‘4,1 ,
/
{--'--14•4 •j4.14'.
' - 1
1 .1. 'V in. T\ •
:4, • \v, %• • " -
..,
TTflH
/A •
• %• b 1. - _)
:',;t..'•-."7•-•_,11.j.(,.(y??,,c!!(,;‘-, • zirr'N--)..sr' *.t:::'•-P"'ir= 14? )))
?.?.}'17j1/ •
j./ • ";( ••
•
• ig,•-• • .
g '
. , I
• _ . 4 . '
• .--_•
,\ 1,
,i \'' ) ,,• „..-;;;i•••••••-...:„..5) .„-r -....,
--7 ..!,;)!!. •,-.•;1/4( 0.-.-...-\ =?::,;;;-7' •;----
1? Is.z•_i .**. 'f'''''''"/:-.... -"'.--
•
11 • LY.;:i \.11';\ •
EXHIBIT D
A Dun), d, Clirr) CIntmuluf.),411
ropii
'c-77 4 W
A P.1.1 -Innen Unit Development
ICZ a...esti • Curvy et •1^1. NI es.
) 0,44 5' gr•q, Lovi 1. • won. Ai 43$
Land Use Plan
• Rir 4.; .1•••,1-1.-1.--ir.* • •1''•
g.
.1.•••••••1
:3U1111^13A IN1Or V
)‘(1 --ii I cl
PROPOSED 3TRF.ET A
M'AT:r7TII •
H
6
CLIFF ROAD
8
z(3
•
12
m
NVld 31.IS
''11
t1 11
• ii• ;
11
CUM ROAD
viva ioaratia •
(o 3
Agenda Information Memo
City Council Meeting March 1, 1988
SITE PLAN REVIEW/ATHLETIC FIELDS FOR ISD #196
F. Site Plan Review of Athletics Fields for Independent School
District #196 Adjacent to High School/Northview Park --At the
last regular meeting of the Advisory Planning Commission held
on Thursday, February 25, 1988, the site plan review of athletic
fields for Independent School District #196, adjacent to the
proposed Eagan High School was reviewed. Action was taken to
approve the site plan as presented.
For additional information on this
report, a copy is enclosed on page(s)
For a copy of the APC minutes on this item, refer to page(s)
item, refer to the staff
6 -to
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the
site plan as presented with or without modifications for athletic
fields adjacent to the high school in Northview Park.
SPECIAL NOTE: The APC minutes for this item will be included
with the Additional Information packet on Monday, February 29.
MEMO TO: TIMOTHY PAWLENTY, CHAIRMAN AND ADVISORY PLANNING
COMMISSION
FROM: DALE C RUNKLE, CITY PLANNER
DATE: FEBRUARY 18, 1988
SUBJECT: SITE PLAN REVIEW FOR EAGAN HIGH SCHOOL
The process for approving the preliminary plat and site plans for
the Eagan High School has deviated from the standardplatting
process the City requires for the development of property.
Because of the magnitude of this project and the time frames to
expedite an opening for 1989, the school district made a special
request to the City Council in 1987 to begin the construction of
the high shool/middle school with platting to occur as plans get
completed in 1988. The school district submitted a general site
plan and building location plan in October of '87 which was
reviewed by the Advisory Planning Commission and acted on by the
City Council on November 5, 1987. This review, however,
consisted only of the building site plan and parking with the
site plan of the entire 90 acres to be reviewed at a later point
in time.
On November 5, 1987, the City Council reviewed and approved the
Comprehensive Guide Plan amendment and rezoning of the property
and preliminary plat conditioned on the following conditions: 1)
that the City staff and school district staff try to arrive at an
overall site plan for recreational and athletic facilities which
will most efficiently and effectively satisfy concerns of the
Eagan residents, 2) the standard plat conditions shall apply, and
3) the proposed modifications to the temporary drainage plan
proposed to accommodate the construction of the actual high
school/middle school building are required in accordance with
staff recommendations outlined in the staff report prior to
issuance of a grading permit. All councilmembers voted
affirmatively.
It has been the intention of the City to work with the school
district to arrive at an overall site plan that would look at
some of Eagan's park and recreational needs as well as the
function of the high school and middle school. Some meetings
have transpired to work out the issues and location of the
facilities however, the school district has indicated the plans
submitted in November, and modified very slightly for the
February '88 Planning Commission review, are the plans the school
district feel best satisfy the school function and for both.
academic and athletic/recreational needs.
The school district has mitigated some of the concerns that the
City has brought out in regard to the location of some of the
facilities. The major concern was the location of the stadium on
the eastern portion of the site. The stadium has been graded or
dished out of the area so the stadium is depressed and birms have.
been placed along Braddock Trail on the east thus mitigating some
concerns regarding site appearance of the facility from Braddock
Trail and the residential neighborhood directly east.
111 C
MEMO TO TIMOTHY PAWLENTY & APC
FEBRUARY 18, 1988
PAGE TWO
There had also been a concern from the Eagan Police Department
regarding traffic and circulation of this facility and how it
relates to major events that would be held at this location. The
City has also received comments from SEH (Short, Elliott,
Hendrickson) who are traffic engineers preparing the City's
overall transportation plan. They also brought out the same
concerns regarding the amount of parking for major events which
would occur on the site.
In review of their comments, it appears that additional parking
should be provided on the north portion of the siteto
accommodate the stadium as well as baseball events which would
reduce or eliminate parking-occuring on residential streets east
of Braddock Trail. These comments have been passed on to the
school district and we expect to meet with them on February 23rd
to receive any comments they may have regarding this particular
concern.
Please find enclosed with this memo, comments from the
Engineering Department as well as the Eagan Police Department
regarding their concerns of this proposed project. Also enclosed
will be the original staff report prepared October 20, 1987 for
your background and review as well as a set of the new revised
site plans which are being proposed for the February meeting. If
anyone has any concerns or would like additional information,
please advise.
City Planner
Enclosures
DCR/af
poiice dapcirhyvent
JAY M. BERTHE
CAi.I of Po .
PATRICK J. GEAGAN
Awninirlr.ln. Caown
UKENNETH D. ASZMANN
�/ t] , �f icsa 1] oosunonl Gown
3830 Pilot Knob Road
Eagan, Minnesota 55122
18 February, 1988
TO: Dale Runkle, City Planner
FROM: Pat Geagan, Captain
SUBJECT: PROPOSED EAGAN HIGH SCHOOL TRAFFIC IMPACT
CONSIDERATIONS
After reviewing the letter from S.E.H. Engineers dated
February 15, 1988, I would like to reiterate the concerns
I expressed in my memo to Tom Hedges dated October 19,
1987, relative to the implications of parking and traffic
in the area.
The S.E.H. study reinforced our feeling relative to
the access onto Braddock Trail from the high school
south parking lot. It is our understanding that the
school buses will be using the south entrance. An access
on a curve, as well as a grade creates an increased
potential for traffic accidents.
The Police Department agrees with S.E.H. Engineering's
assessment that a parking lot on the north end of the
recreational complex should be considered. If parking
is not provided in closer proximity to the recreational
fields, it is our experience that people will park illegally
both on the roadway, as well as on the boulevards.
This provides a high level of frustration for people
who are receiving citations and having their vehicles
towed, as well as the adjacent residential neighborhoods
who are concerned about safety.
Pat Geagan
Captain
PJG/kg
CC:
Tom Hedges, City Administrator
Jay Berthe, Police Chief
"Tom Colbert, Public Works Director
THE LONE OAK TREE... THE SYMBOL OF STRENGTH AND GROWTH IN OUR COMMUNITY
GRADING/DRAINAGE/EROSION CONTROL: The grading plan reviewed at
this time provides for grading of the building site, parking lots
and a major internal ponding area (Pond JP -34A) in addition to
the athletic fields. The athletic fields include 11 ball fields,
a stadium for football/track located northeast of the school,
west of Braddock Trail and a football/track facility located
north of Northview Elementary School. The stadium is to be
graded to the same elevation as Braddock Trail, however, a 10
foot high berm for landscaping purposes is proposed between the
street and the stadium. Northeasterly of the stadium a 200' by
400' level area is to be graded to an elevation of approximately
3' to 5' above Braddock Trail. The ball field abutting Northview
Park Road is approximately 7' above the street. The low area
and trees located to the west of the ballfields are intended to
be preserved in their natural state. The ballfields located on
the school side abutting the existing ballfields in Northview
Park are approximately 7' to 13' above the existing ballfields in
Northview Park. All slopes are shown to be 3 to 1 or less.
The drainage can be separated into five areas as discussed below:
1. The drainage area tributary to Pond JP -34A which is located
immediately north of the school includes approximately 55%
of the school site drainage. The proposed drainage area is
57.0 acres. The storage volume in Pond JP -34A was assumed to
be 14.1 acre feet as opposed to the proposed 12.58 acre
feet. The storage volume in Pond JP -34A is required to be
increased to the 14.1 acre feet storage requirement. This
increase in required storage volume will increase the HWL of
Pond JP -3.4A approximately 1' to an elevation of 905.
2. The drainage area tributary to the stadium discharges
directly into the existing storm sewer in Braddock Trail.
This drainage area is approximately 6.4 acres. The existing
storm sewer in Braddock Trail is adequately sized to handle
the storm water runoff generated by the 6.4 acres.
3. The drainage area tributary to the existing low area located
in the northwest corner of the school site receives runoff
from approximately 15.3 acres. The proposed storm sewer
discharging into the lower area is required to be
constructed to the same elevation as the existing outlet
pipe installed in Northview Park Road.
4. The drainage area of school site tributary to Pond JP -34 in
Northview Park is approximately 13.5 acres. Due to
potential future development adjacent to Pond JP -34 in
Northview Park approximately 2.7 acres in the school site is
required to be redirected to the low area located in the
northwest corner of this site. Therefore, the direct
drainage area to Pond JP -34 in Northview Park is reduced
from 13.5 acres to 10..8 acres.
5. The drainage area tributary to Pond JP -29 located northwest
of Northview Elementary School is approximately 27 acres.
Presently two storm sewer segments ae proposed to discharge
into the undeveloped portion of Northview Park at its
southerly end. These two storm sewers must be connected
to the proposed storm sewer system serving the football/track
field. This storm sewer is to be constructed westerly
discharging into Pond JP -29 at its controlled Normal Water
Level (NWL) of 926.5.
No erosion/sediment control plan has been submitted for review
for the proposed Phase 4 construction. The following items will
need to be addressed relating to construction scheduling:
1. The storm water drainage plan needs to be finalized and
storm sewer constructed before major grading activities in
the ballfield areas can proceed. The first step in the
construction is probably going to be construction of the
permanent storm water ponds, then the storm sewer outlet
pipes will be constructed. After the permanent ponding
areas are constructed and the storm sewer pipes are in, the
temporary sediment basin areas may be graded.
2. During the major grading of the ballfields there will be a
need for temporary sediment trap construction.
3. The phasing of the site restoration should be identified and
consistent with construction scheduling.
Anticipated phosphorus loadings exported by the offsite and high
school development area, without treatment provided by the onsite
ponds, is estimated at 163 pounds annually. Utilizing the most
efficient storm water routing for phosphorus removal, the export
of loadings offsite may be reduced to approximately 89 pounds
annually. Reduction in loadings from offsite and high school
development areas is approximately 55%. The current drainage
plan as proposed by HGA & Associates will provide maximum
phosphorus removal with the proposed onsite pond (Pond JP -34A).
UTILITIES: Sanitary sewer of sufficient size and
the school site was provided under the utility
Northview Park Road. This sanitary sewer service
the northwest corner of the school site. The 4"
service to serve the stadium shall be either
including cleanouts every 100' or upgraded to an
sewer terminating with a manhole at the stadium.
depth to serve
contract for
was stubbed to
sanitary sewer
constructed
8" diameter
Water service will be provided by a 12" trunk watermain
constructed from the existing 20" trunk watermain in County Road
30 and connecting to the existing 8" watermain in Braddock Trail.
This main will be located in the high pressure zone. The
Comprehensive Water Plan recommends services below elevation 955
may require pressure reduction valves. The school will need to
evaluate where pressure reduction valves may be, required within
their facility.
STREETS/ACCESS/CIRCULATION: Access to the proposed middle
school and high school complex is shown from Braddock Trail in
three locations. Braddock Trail and Northview Park Road are
planned to be constructed to MSA design standards under City
Contract #88-03 during 1988. Proposed parking for the school
complex is provided in three areas. The south parking area
appears to be able to accomodate slightly under 250 vehicles.
The easterly parking lot, directly off of Braddock Trail appears
to be able to hold more than 300 vehicles. A third lot
immediately south of the football stadium and near Braddock Trail
appears to be able to hold approximately 150 vehicles. The
City's Traffic Engineering Consultant has reviewed the adequacy
of the proposed parking. The number of parking spaces for a
normal school day appears to be adequate for the forecasted
enrollment. With the exception of major athletic events, parking
may also be adequate in terms of number of spaces. However, the
distance from the parking area to some of the facilities makes
them less than desirable.
The Traffic Engineering Consultants has identified two concerns.
Any overflow of parking that cannot be handled by the school
parking lots must take place in the residential neighborhood to
the east. Since this will only occur a few times a year for major
sporting events, the parking may be tolerated by the
neighborhood. However, there is a question of safety of
pedestrians crossing Braddock Trail at several locations. The
locations of the proposed parking areas may also lead to parking
in the residential neighborhoods. The major baseball field
is just north of the football stadium and is a quarter mile walk
from the nearest parking area. The practice or softball fields
in the northwest corner of the school property are also a
significant distance from any parking area. Anticipated users of
these fields will probably park along Northview Park Road. If
activities are scheduled on several ball diamonds at the same
time, there will be inadequate parking along the road. Parking
will then appear to take place either illegally on school
grounds, illegally on Braddock Trail or in the surrounding
neighborhood streets.
The second concern identified by the Traffic Engineering
Consultant is the peak period exit from the parking areas. There
will obviously be some delays in the parking lot gaining access
to Braddock Trail and then ultimately to Diffley Road or
Northview Park Road. However, there are no feasible solutions to
this issue.
The Traffic Engineering Consultant has also identified a need for
a supplementary parking lot at the north end of the recreational
complex. The proposed supplementary parking lot at the north end
of the complex should be sized based on the need for a joint
city/school recreational complex.
EASEMENTS/RIGHT-OF-WAY/PERMITS: The school will be required to
dedicate the appropriate easements for public utility
construction and the ponding easement for Pond JP -34A.
An additional 17' wide roadway and trailway easement must be
dedicated along the westerly side of Braddock Trail. Proposed
right-of-way for Northview Park Road to accomodate the roadway
and a trailway must be dedicated with this plat.
The development shall be responsible for insuring that all
regulatory Agency permits are required in the appropriate time
frame as required by the affected agency.
CONDITIONS
1. These standard conditions of plat approval as adopted by
Council action on September 15, 1987 shall be complied with:
A 1, B 1, B 2, B 3, B 4, C 1, C 2, C 5, D 1, and E 1.
2.
The development is responsible for revising the proposed.
internal storm sewer system to comply with the requirements
outlined in the staff report.
3. An additional 17' wide roadway and trailway easement is
required along the westerly side of Braddock Trail.
STANDARD CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL
A. Assessments
1. This development shall accept its additional assessment
obligations as defined in the staff's report in.
accordance with the final plat dimensions and the rates
in effect at the time of final plat approval.
B. Easements and Rights -of -Way
1. This development shall dedicate 10' drainage and utility
easements centered over all common lot lines and adjacent
to private property or public right-of-way.
2. This development shall dedicate, provide, or financially
guarantee its proportionate share of the acquisition
costs of additional drainage, ponding, and utility
easements as required by the alignment, depth, and
storage capacity of all required public utilities and
streets located beyond the boundaries of this plat or
outside of dedicated public right-of-way as necessary to
service this development.
3. This development shall dedicate all public right-of-way
and temporary slope basements for ultimate development of
adjacent roadways as required by the appropriate
jurisdictional agency.
4. This development shall dedicate adequate drainage and
ponding easements to incorporate the required high water
elevation necessitated by City storm water storage volume
requirements.
C. Plans and Specifications
1. All public streets and utilities necessary to provide
service to this development shall be designed by a
registered professional engineer in accordance with City
codes and; engineering standards and policies, and
approved by staff prior to final plat approval.
2. A detailed grading, drainage, erosion, and sediment
control plan must be prepared in accordance with current
City standards and approved by staff prior to final plat
approval.
3. This development shall insure that all temporary dead end
public streets shall have a cul-de-sac constructed in
accordance with City engineering standards.
4. A detailed landscape plan shall be submitted on the
proposed grading plan and approved by staff prior to the
final plat approval. The financial guarantee shall be
included in the Development Contract and not released
until one year after the date of installation.
�, 3
STANDARD CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL
PAGE TWO
5. All internal public and private streets shall be
constructed within the required right-of-way in
accordance with City design standards.
D. Public Improvements
1. If any public improvements are to be installed under a
City contract, the appropriate project must be approved
by Council action prior to final plat approval.
E. Permits
1. This development shall be responsible for the acquisition
of all regulatory agency permits in the time frame
required by the affected agency.
F. Parks Dedication
1. This development shall fulfull its parks dedication
requirements as recommended by the Advisory Parks and
Recreation Commission and approved by Council action.
G. Other
1. All standard platting and zoning conditions shall be
adhered to unless specifically granted a variance by
Council action.
Advisory Planning Commission City Council
Approved: August 25, 1987 September 15, 1987
Revised:
LTS#2
STANDARD
aNfl I J3W
lYeYo< 31nr 9eva 1 ••
1333 Op. • HOMI 1 :311,8
i%;
7—
/
avo8
ay`E o
Sia z
o 1 11 19
,is
!1�!!r
11
111
1N11 [ 1/1II€31 g€ ;11 11, r1 ill . !11 Il lrlx,,1161 11 11 91 1 1111
I ,i1� Ilos
1 111 11 I I
• 4
1..11,14114.
.1.11.14,411
.—J
ito
4
1,1 eiry
air kW
ger S!!
Fro-fitrotaI
at
lain 1
-.........-1-
I
'7 S
11111111
wain
t
�I !fie 15 i of�o 4! 11
1 • f �� ���,�r s! !1yy gg�a� a, egg
93 ! ;3 kfi� 17 1 I!11 1 1! 111 1r1 395 [if i91?g 9 1 ig
9: ! s 9 p�P 3 �
� 6 Rr �! � �� �gS
1i I6k: 3r o`. �t aiI III 894 3i��� t r@iii'
1
I
— 1-
717
al
PQtE—VAULT
—
_.. — -- —1
1
I I
PRACTICE SOCCER
/ •
1,
r{"r}o}p}Cr}
DISCUS
1..4,
ci
r. _.... _.....� . i
0
z
1'
1� a�
11 II
1
1 1
11 11
lh 1 i
li i 0
h,g ig�13 1( IIRI ! 1 � �! $,1�� 1.111
! 1 � 119 1 Ra19S's � s9 �
1 9x5 111 1 ,1 1p 1)1 1;1!1 11 11 .i
p3 i sy $ EE !. 7 1 .1;
i111 319 10 11 11.1 j9 011 :19,11 9� 11 lii9
OF \ y
Nasi
1
SCHOOL
a40
1 ■P 1 1
:7411,:s.,
IN el rr�sZR��� 4�A® e
y ��g,p1
//mss//iiii/iiie��//�
z T ;c es���4►:a
!`�ddi ..
to
s_
r//11"7. A 4(.4
eft
jOCCER.,T
-BASEBAL
__.aH,fiWG
N SOF/ IR '.
_ —
'77
11 luul
® 1101
11 1111
II
11i1 III 1 11 1 ill 11 111 0 I�E��
,
11, Ill 1iR� � 1t ih
did{ hi iH
� E� , f
s9 I I° � ; , , s.,,
1�3 1 it ,J
ENTRY PLAZA
WW0:6"
• Week a No y
rl�a�••••i•••••,.
tlllwi®••°••
mum
■�lo�e
mam
mmis
Illuw®11
1®111��®111,
Irl�Iwr�
Tite•Wam..
41/4*
1616
/1111111
iulllll
E1111
0
1
I j E� s !i` iEE €fe01
y ;
I ;€ i y,! i� '11111 n
11, ;,I ��! , {I ill,
V ! 1i 11111 Ii' 11 €1 IF1 31 ;t� l+'/1 11 sl e
1111 !{!�!I111I1111 1111i 11111111
WI
**0
440\\ ■■■ INIIIMEIMIIIMM
<. II■IIS 41/4
MIMI 11•11111
111M111 MEM
UMW MINN
data a MI 11111.111111k
Miallar
1J
- . k i
.—
;in;lllnommll,.. IIII,
t�k tS,K r
e
\k.
\qt
kte
4
s:�.z 11 ,,ti ar"-- --- 1 •,,.
€ X- 3— ,C'r
-t`
!*
• �•a��.aN N. .........�...�... M. +
17.
rm
11
J
■nma
eun
ew
te
�-
,
)
tna
4
i
q�
]I
|
Eni
Pnl
1
---------•
---
Y._
---- .•
SITE GRADING (TEST)
• 1,4 041-4,14r
.11,
j! -JI
/L
, • .
------ -------
• ' ' ,
. • ' „
7 - 7 .t ,
. •
CITY OF EAGAN
SUBJECT: REZONING/PRELIMINARY PLAT EAGAN HIGH SCHOOL
DAKOTA HILLS MIDDLE SCI1OOL
APPLICANT: INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT 196
TOM WILSON ;.
LOCATION: SE 1/4 SECTION 23, NORTH OF DIFFLEY ROAD
WEST OF BRADDOCIC TRAIT,"
EXISTING ZONING: A - AGRICULTURAL DISTRICT
DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: OCTOBER 27, 1987
aa.
DATE OF REPORT: OCTOBER 20, 1987
REPORTED BY: PLANNING AND ENGINEERING DEPARTMENTS
APPLICATION SUBMITTED: An application has been: submitted requesting
a rezoning of approximately 90 acres from A(Agricultural) to P.F.
(Public Facilities) to allow a high school ah. middle school to be
constructed. The second application submitted is a request for
preliminary plat consisting of approximately 90.,acres and containing
one lot and two outlots located in the southeas3t 1/4 of Section 23.
or
ZONING AND LAND USE: Presently the ,pFoperty is zoned A
(Agricultural) and is guided for residential development, however,
the .1980 Comprehensive Guide has designated a high school site.
location in this section but not on the specific parcel that is
being proposed. Therefore, along with the rezoning a Comprehensive
Plan Amendment will be required in order .o align the public
facilities district in accordance with the'.usecbeing proposed.
COMMENTS: In review of the Eagan High School; facility for platting
and zoning, the City staff has been meeting with the representatives
of School District 196 in order to establishl;a date of which the.
opening of the high school would occur in ;the fall of 1989. In
backing a time schedule from the fall of 1989, the building will
have to begin construction the fall of 1987, therefore, the
representatives of 196, besides the plattirhg process, are also
requesting footings, foundation, etc., in order that construction of
the high school can start around mid -Novembers in order to meet the
fall 1989 opening. In the negotiations that, have taken place the
City had informed School District 196 thatabuilding permits and
construction could not begin on this site until final plat had been
received from the City. The School Districct indicated that the
final plat process wouldn't be completed until the first part of
1988 and that construction had to begin earlier in order to obtain
the fall opening. Through several meetings and working on time
schedules there has been an agreement between, the City staff and the
School District staff in regard to a process -which could allow the
school to begin construction and the platting to occur and be
completed in the first part of 1987. This process established
allowed the s-eparation of the building site which contains
approximately 15 - 18 acres and the residual 70 acres for school
facilities such as ball field, football stadiums, parking, etc., to
be Looked at and studied in more detail. This process allows both
the school district and the City to concentrate on a building site.
The building will contain approximately 430,000 square feet of space
for both the high school and middle school facility and allow the
inner relationship between the access, Barking and building location
to be worked out in detail. Once the footings and building have
been started then the remaining acres can be considered for location
of the school facilities which include softball, soccer, football,
storm ponding and everything else that is required for the exterior
component of the school facility.
The issue which arose is that the City had some concern in regard to
the placement of ball fields and recreational facilities on the
residual 70 acres other than what was proposed by School District
196. In discussing the concerns regarding the location there
appears to be two opinions as to why and how the recreational
facilities have been located on the site, therefore, instead of
tying up the entire development until a plan can be resolved, the
City staff has agreed to allow the building to go forward in regard
to footings, foundation and allow the residual site plan with the
ball fields, recreational facilities, utilities and storm drainage
to be reevaluated and to come up with the best possible plan that
can be agreed upon by both the City staff and the representatives of
School District 196. It has been the indication that both parties
will willingly work andcooperateto try to arrive at an overall
plan that can be supported by both organizations.
In review of the proposed facility, the school district had
indicated the total square footage of both the high school and
middle school would be approximately 430,000 square feet. Once the.
City heard how large this facility was to be, it was reviewed for
the environmental criteria and it was found that an Environmental
Assessment Worksheet is required for this facility. Staff has
worked with the school district representatives and have prepared an
Environmental Assessment Worksheet which was published in the
Environmental Quality Board Monitor on October 19, 1987. The 30 day
review process would end on November 19, an-d--c-on-st=r-ucton- could
start anytime after that date.
Staff has reviewed the site plan for the footprint of the school,
working with the access and circulation of the parking in
relationship to the school and number of parking spaces that would
be required. The City Fire Marshal has reviewed the site plan for
access for the fire vehicles and also attached with this report is a
memorandum from the Police Department spelling out their concerns in
regard to this facility. The school district will be present on
October 27 in order to give a presentation to the Planning
Commission in regard to the elevations and proposed location of the
school on the site. Also, they will discuss the time, frame that
they are trying to establi-sh and some of the concerns regarding the
overall site planning for the entire site.
GRADING/DRAINAGE/EROSION CONTROL: The proposed grading plan for the
entire high school/middle school site provides for virtually
regrading of the entire site except for a small stand of pine trees
in the northwesterly portion and the severely sloping wooded
topography on the south, adjacent to Diffley Road. A detailed
analysis of the proposed grading plan is limited to the building
site at this time due to City staff concerns regarding the
orientation of the athletic and ponding facilities.
A grading plan for the building site provides for grading of the
building area and the southerly parking lot. Entrance to the
southerly parking lot will be provided by constructing an entrance,
approximately 600' north of Diffley Road, onto Braddock Trail_. The
building site grading plan also provides for constructing a
temporary drainage ditch north from Diffley Road. This temporary
drainage ditch is proposed to be constructed easterly from the
building site to Braddock Trail and paralleling Braddock Trail to
its low point. At the low point, a sedimentation pond is proposed
which outlets onto Braddock Trail by an overland spillway.
Calculations have been provided which verify the sedimentation pond
area requirements and the temporary drainage ditch design for a
five-year design storm period. After review of the proposed
drainage, staff recommends constructing the drainage ditch allowing
the future storm sewer alignment allowing the overland drainage to
discharge into a natural depression located immediately north of the
building and west of the proposed stockpile area. The natural
depression could serve as the sedimentation pond. A controlled
outlet structure could be constructed at the northerly end of the
natural depression which would discharge overland to the low point
in Braddock Trail. At Braddock Trail, it is recommended a storm
sewer pipe be constructed from the existing storm sewer to serve as
an outlet to this proposed sedimentation pond area. The proposed
trunk storm sewer alignment would prevent any overland drainage onto
Braddock Trail and the adjacent homes in the event of a storm,
greater than the five-year design frequency, would occur. Also, by
utilizing the natural depression as a sedimentation pond, an outlet
could easily be constructed that would provide storage for greater
than a five-year frequency storm. The increased storage volume also
serves as a safety factor in the event that a storm greater than the
five-year frequency design does occur. The concern is for when the
ground is in a frozen condition which would then inhibit the storm
water seepage into the existing ground therefore increasing runoff.
Trunk storm sewer facilities to serve the school site and the area
south of Diffley Road are proposed to be constructed under a City
contract in the spring of 1988. The school site will be required to
provide approximately 14.1. acre/feet of onsite ponding. The
proposed onsite storm sewer concept is acceptable but subject to
further review based on the uncertainty of the residual 70 acre
configuration. The proposed drainage basins direct their runoff to
locations which are adequately sized to accommodate anticipated
runoff volumes.
A grading, drainage and erosion'control plan was submitted as a part
of the preliminary plat proposal for the school.
UTILITIES: Sanitary sewer service to the school site will be
provided by the existing sanitary sewer in Northview Park Road at
the northwest corner of the site.
Water service will be provided by a looped water main connecting to
the 20" trunk water main in Diffley Road and the 8" water main in
Braddock Trail. The 8" water main connection in Braddock Trail will
be provided on the southerly side of the pressure reducing station
placing the high school site in the high pressure zone. A looped
water main system is proposed to be constructed around the building
to provide proper fire protection.
EASEMENTS/RIGHT-OF-WAY/PERMITS: This development shall be
responsible for dedicating a 60' half right-of-way along Diffley
Road and additional right-of-way to provide a minimum 66' full
right-of-way width along Braddock Trail in accordance with the City
of Eagan requirements. The right-of-way along Braddock Trail shall
parallel the alignment of the constructed roadway. In addition, a
10' wide trailwayeasement shall be dedicated to incorporate an 8'
bituminous trail along the west side of Braddock Trail. A minimum
80' right-of-way shall also be dedicated for Northview Park Road.
Permanent easements shall be provided for the trunk_ _water main from
Diffley Road to Braddock Trail and for the trunk storm sewer from
Diffley Road to the pond northerly of the school. The permanent
easement shall also include the pond to its high water level and the
outlet from the pond to the west line of the school site. The
sanitary sewer from Northview Park Road to the school shallbe
considered a private line and no easement is required.
All regulatory agency permits shall be acquired within the
appropriate time frame as required by the affected agency.
STREETS/ACCESS/CIRCULATION: Access to the proposed school site is
taken from Braddock Trail in four locations: The southerly access
is located approximately 600° north of Diffley Road; one is proposed
opposite the southerly intersection of Pennsylvania Avenue in the
Stafford Place Addition and Braddock Trail; another is proposed
opposite Atlantic Avenue; and the northerly access is proposed at a
location which is offset from the northerly intersection of
Pennsylvania Avenue and Braddock Trail. This northerly offset
entrance to the school site will not be allowed in its proposed
location. The northerly entrance will be allowed at a location
which is opposite the northerly intersection of Pennsylvania Avenue
and Braddock Trail. No entrance from Northview Park Road is
proposed.
No on -street parking has been provided for the school side of
Braddock Trail.
The dimension details of the proposed internal traffic circulations
of the parking lot areas of the school site are subject to staff
review and approval during a detailed site plan analysis.
ASSESSMENTS: The proposed school site has been levied the following
assessments: Sanitary sewer trunk under Project 433 and water area
and water lateral benefit from trunk under Project 365.
The school site is subject to the following pending assessments:
Sanitary sewer lateral benefit, water lateral benefit from trunk,
storm sewer trunk and Northview Park Road street assessments all
under Project 498, storm sewer trunk under Project 479, and water
area under Project 485.
The following assessments are proposed as a condition of final plat
approval:
PROJ # DESCRIPTION RATE QTY AMT
365 Water Availability
Charge $1,920/ac 89.96 ac $172,723
365 Water Lateral Benefit
Upgrade 8.08/ff 610 ff 4,929
365 Additional Water Lateral
Benefit 20.55/ff 577 ff 11,857
479 Storm Sewer Trunk
Upgrade ,026/sf'. 64,000 sf 1,664
479 Storm Sewer Trunk
Upgrade .026/sf 403,200 sf 10,483
(504,000 x .8)
478 Add'l Storm Sewer
Trunk .079/sf 2,735,258 sf • 216,085
Future Cty Rd. 30 Upgrade 82.37/ff 1,187 ff 97,773
Future Storm Sewer Lateral 10.39/ff 1,187 ff 12,333
Benefit - Cty. Rd. 30
Future Trailway
12.40/ff
1,187 ff 14,719
TOTAL PROPOSED ASSESSMENT $542,566
The final assessment amount will be determined using rates in effect
at the time of final plat approval and based on final plat
dimensions and areas.
CONDITIONS FOR EAGAN HIGH SCHOOL AND DAKOTA HILLS MIDDLE SCHOOL:
1. That the City staff and school district staff will try to arrive
at an overall site plan for recreational and athletic facilities
which will most efficiently and effectively satisfy the concerns
of the Eagan residents.
2. The standard plat conditions shall apply.
3. The proposed modifications to the temporary drainage plan
proposed to accommodate the construction of the actual high
school/middle school building are required in accordance with
the staff recommendations outlined in the staff report prior to
issuance of a grading permit.
<t�
coJic3 de cr meit
JAY M. BERTHS
Chief of Poko
PATRICK J. GEAGAN
Administrotive Captain
KENNETH b. ASZMANN
Operations Captain
3830 Pilot Knob Road
Eagan, Minnesota 55122
19 October, 1987
TO: TOM HEDGES
FROM: CAPTAIN GEAGAN
SUBJECT: LAW ENFORCEMENT ISSUES CONCERNING THE NEW EAGAN
HIGH SCHOOL
Following the Staff Advisory Planning Meeting with high
school officials, a subsequent meeting was held within the
Police Department to discuss potential law enforcement
issues concerning a high school facility in the City of
Eagan.
The Eagan Police Department has discussed with Rosemount
Police Department, as well as Apple Valley Police
Department, issues concerning the schools in their areas.
It seems the biggest drain on police resources are special
events, ie. football games, dances, etc. Areas of a
criminal nature which seem to pose problems are theft,
vandalism and traffic violations.
TRAFFIC: The Police Department is concerned over the lack
of student parking at the new high school. The E.A.W.
indicates that the student parking lots are anticipated
to be nearly full. After reviewing parking at both
Rosemount High School., as well as Apple Valley High School,
we would recommend the additional 150 parking places that
were originally allowed for future expansion be immediately
used for parking. Because of the configuration of Braddock
Trail, in conjunction with the Eagan High School, parking
on Braddock Trail will have to be extremely limited.
The department is also concerned about access from the
high school onto Braddock Trail. The access onto Braddock
Trail is on a curve, as well as a grade. It would seem
there is a potential for motor vehicle accidents, as well
as difficulty with exiting up Braddock Trail and out onto
County Road 30 on snow and ice.
THE LONE OAK TREE...THE SYMBOL OF STRENGTH AND GROWTH IN OUR COMMUNITY
�`I
Page 2
LAW ENFORCEMENT ISSUES CONCERNING THE NEW EAGAN HIGH
SCHOOL
TRAFFIC; (Continued)
We are also concerned about the safety of exiting traffic
f.rom.. Braddock Trail during school events onto Diffley
Road. We have discussed this with Pete Sorenson from
The Dakota County Engineer's Office and have come to
a mutual agreement that a signal light which could be
manually controlled would be appropriate for that
intersection. We would also recommend a street light
at the same intersection.
SECURITY: The Police Department would like to recommend
extensive security lighting surrounding the school,
as well as the parking lot and playing fields. The
Police Department security access to the West and North
side of the building will be minimal, as it appears
that we are unable to drive around it. The City of
Eagan currently has a school within the community with
a similar .West side exposure where we have had a problem
with juveniles congregating and causing vandalism and
other nefarious acts.
The Eagan Police Department is quite concerned about
a football field being positioned adjacent to Braddock
Trail. We do not feel this blends into a residential
community which will be directly .across the street.
Even though new residents may realize the potential
for noise, there is no doubt the Police Department will
be getting noise complaints when activities are carried
on at the football field. We are also concerned about
large groups of young people congregating in the area
of the football field adjacent to the single family
homes. This situation creates a high potential for
vandalism and disorderly conduct in or near the residential
area. We would like to recommend the football field
be placed as far from the residential areas as possible.
Rosemount Police Department has informed me their
department furnishes about 10 police reserve officers
to the school at $12.50 per hour per officer, for football
games and other activities where a large number of people
congregate. With the Eagan Police Department's current
staffing levels, I'm sure we would be unable tohave
half that number of sworn officers even on a part• -time
basis available. Rosemount Police Department advises
me that a large number of uniformed police officers
greatly reduces the potential for problems at athletic
events.
Page 3
LAW ENFORCEMENT ISSUES CONCERNING THE NEW EAGAN HIGH
SCHOOL
The Eagan Police Departmentfeels that with a cooperative
effort between the Police Department and the Rosemount/
Apple Valley School District, we can positively address
these problems.
Pat Geagan_
Captain
PJG/lb
CC: Chief Berthe
Ken Vraa
•
NVld `J' MINVld
3
5
i
•
n
3
" ; •
•
>0
0
z0
z0
..•
- •
----
• _ •
,pc • .
II/ \ •
\
fi
\\ •
HEDLUND
. _ *
- -1,,-i-•.., .;---. -.\..!- --' -,,,--'—.:--- ' °-:7-.
H. - -,1) - 1,'. 1
.._ . . ,,,. - ...i! ., I ...,-•1 • •` - • '
. .. _ . . ,11 - . ,..___,_, ' I 14 ';.. • . -j • --:,
• ... - li _ . ,11.a Et 14 pil .
. , . ... .
-.-, • L ,. . I 6., - ' I I 11 . L a
• -,a_, -1 ..-.,
- -,-1- ( =• )
. — •
-= 1.--- ... 1 . —1 ri• ,. ..•
1 • •••;. - , I , - .=, -- .5., -..:
)
: . • = = - ' 1 ' .
.. .
•
- _
. . :
'1' .,• 'It,.
..•• 1...
HEDLUND
ounor A
m =£
t£
r;
0 oe ;
M fg
ter; a
O i
.Z
— ' OliflEY — —
.._.``. —.S—__o
0
r
s
a
PENNSYLVANIA
OP
m
\
1Vld A2IVNIWI13b
g'7
964 iO 8ISIa I00140
EAGAN HIGH SCHOOL ADDITION
A3A1:111S AavaNnos
IVld A?IVNIW11321d
Gq
E.
STORM SEWER TRUNK UPGRADE
ADD'L STORM SEWER TRUNK
Ell Ea EN STORM SEWER LATERAL
LATERAL BENEFIT
Gm.
UPGRADE -WATER
ADD'L LATERAL BENEFIT -WATER
'‘I"Igrar.- CO. RD. 30 UPGRADE
... ••••••• TRAILVVAY
re."'
cs,4—
3
1 di
111
0.
0.
I.V.14 .64 /MY .0.0 01
tr:1
r-
0
k
0
0
Oh !!
= -
1 11 I 11
11 01AT/fir
(1&Y.F.4LF...
0
1/
i !
' I
,71
x I \
m
, 0
f • 2' \
' 1 1 btig o og• • • •••••••••••••••••••••••••• 6-ei • 0 1
z r-ollilrifir7.1011:011.:401,1411V.allindfillrilirdillivAriv"...airill o;L._ _
. 7 ,
— — 1 I--
\
PREPARED FOR INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT 196
z
OJ rri
o
C
Aamins AUVO
v
J P- 3'4.::::•:,
884.0'.::::.:.:.: ,
89/. 9 •••••••••••••••:::,:l..
J P - 29
•••••••• • " '•
945.0
926.0
`,'•,:. •::.•:........ii..;
• ::•::.;
.•.•.•. • i J P - 2 7.
8 96.0 • ,JP -26
,0
cx..: -.'• No''''',J -aa
...,„ 7
J 1 P-51 .:<--,Ji,iz.-:-.,.. - J - z 30' N
1' ::-..--;_r.:;:::_,-.:.=.1-:--..t.:.:
-,.- ---iJ-
. Y
\
- I PLACE 'I \
9 80.0 .J -e e
9 76.0
I i
I : td-
$
rJ P -28 1 ''
''''' 9 5 6.o„,....,...,..1.....imi.i. L 1 ..,...tt,;.,,41, TH: ,,, : i : , • .• .., if . j p •--.• 1.6,018TC,P'S?.10 ,'• I
JP -52 1
Kri
1
: \ 1 I ...; t r. DD. 'i 969.4 8 6 2.0
I , e... .,•77. -1:: --,i,,,,,: • $1 , • i A r":', ,-.11 8 78,0 1
. ,
-'71 • \ 1 ' -- --\
, ,1,4,:•ArkOw‘a • .'L-: J: -....,..„1........._ ....„,,,.:
•,:',..•:::;..'.,,:l I
...,:,.....2.....4
i I t'..•,' - i \i,...--/ ::i
'",1::'..-'-4r.,.•,
K`lt-. - -
„,... ..... --7".......... , 9 7 / . 7
,, J P -50
_
9640 — '' • ''
\ ''-:t..P'-32 , f.-•::
_.
' z 879.0-
884.3 •••,' { L; 1
4i1.11.[.11i1-. `-"48,g ''LUT ; '1....:.,..,
) ..t...•,...L P -507775- .6.1 .. . ,. ? ii..i.:,-,P:...48.,_, . ',, ............. #
I 1
-- -- ,----77:-.--- 903 5: Hit L.
i',35',.:-.‘1,:,-1 \ \. ' . 1:>•Nst ...--!'"A .1:K --....--,,,T , 89 1.3 \ 8 8 4.4AN4 '• I f'KE .Z. /04 • i
4., •;••'-;?.-1-iVi51-7:"-rk.:11.:T\-ils” ''')../..,/,... -;;•/,,:,..-,:. L,,,i,8,93.0 :i.it-•,.‘.---,.-r
(5
S. - 24 11. .
`,•:,-4.-.; '1
•
J- r
JP- 53 JP -22 P\ ,t
8 64.0 820.7 N.
8 80. 4 \ 840.0 ,"
\C
city of eagan
PUBLIC
WORKS
DEPARTMENT
EAGAN HIGH SCHOOL ADD.
SUBJECT PARCEL
STORM SEWER
MASTER PLAN
approved:
standard
plate 4:
//03
81,0
0
•
12" 112
;1
-'7 '- ;, ,, L• ; :,;; .
WEs121 ; -
" .' I ; .I , 1 : ' ? ' ; ::".:-.1 .!' ,,.."..7.1 2"
our MINI -www•cliork-mmecommc.111•1111171•11•1:1111111611.:0111111C1111MME OM: *awl/A_ _. . _ . .
• U i
50,4/67.0 38.4/56.0 ._))
,..
1
54.6/71.0 %12"
12"
MO SIM Me daft
1
;-•
5 3.1 / 6 8.0 1.J
503/67.0
‘4.
41 i
i Ipio- -f-ralitib‘
.........,
glii, 12
17 16 "
i MM
. 53.7/ 72.0
— - 2:u: .......••••• qa„......_ 00 .444 " 4; i
_ ..?:... ••••••:•:•:•:•:.:.:•:.
--..• sm.
,.......... .
'. ...
It142 it
51.4 / 65.0 ..,...........•.
,1 18.4 / 2 9.0 .............. : ‘, aly.4- L _ .
>-4:.:.:•:.:•:•:•:•••
66.7/85,C
2 0'it 180
......
. "•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:
-3 I. Cr! tkc 6 MG. GROUND STORpt.,,:••.... %:•::::, 112 "
.„..., H.W.L. 1059 •—•..x.•.:—.
-----........_241; ff, ::::::•:•:•:.:•:...
. • •••••••••.•. .I.• • *4%
88 0/72 0% 72.0 20 "
- .. • . • • 90" .ft..•,,-,
elm !iiiiii!eiliis,aiii*.emp:Onaliv illamPAPrgiragrialk
68.7/ 74.0 i
D 66.0/820
12"
35.5/50.0
r
tt!
- \\
'..t -T.171(17
[10 2 0 1
86,0/9
12'
• • ...,,,.,,.„..,
1 , , i \ \ •:,,,•-3,...„
I •--.1.4 •il•----'".:.), \„) ...:-----i. \ •\•'1,-i-1. -
1 IY-'•-• • ' ,
---i ( , •i• . , '''-..‘74::.(:i.j.,‘,i-t
ri4--
. ;.„, • 41:2T'i.
.,1.• -
54.Q 1' /71i,;,:
• • „.-.-rc.:.:_icAt':
1.02.01
..1.76...6:3'
-i -... .I; \ -- -•
.:•\..---A;t4-.- 01.1./fpp;-...
nt- .
431,•,,i.
1.•:.-244isi'l,:ii.i.
.1.1-((i[z•-•:......-,-.:(-!".-
74.4/82.0
;-•
ir.
70.9 / 76.0'
110201
0
tO
ZL
2.6'
43,3/58.0
102:1.1: y(?:1. 1k_
110201
85,2/95.0
1
1
42 2/58.0
39.0/54.Q
16" .
84.5/95.0
0DLE189 I 2"
:119CrtiC ino um am am am
;1
0 LE,'Ilcily,f
LtIL,Lt
1IO20J
88.4/99 0 12
'I) 47.6/630 ;
197 195
I I 1 (
1 11 (:11.))
0142"1
94.7/100.0
•
. (IC ()•\ i'V'‘P
,
AKEW 0 I
ill
fs
,,-
;
•..
93.7/104,0.1c-- _.
is"
OVERHIL_C:.1._..!
-'12 • .. ))
. ,
20"
EAGAN HIGH SCHOOL ADD.
SUBJECT PARCEL
A
FIG. +3
city of eagan
PUBLIC
M WORKS
DEPARTMEN
WATER
MASTER PLAN
approved
standard
plate 4:
Agenda Information Memo
City Council Meeting March 1, 1988
COMPREHENSIVE GUIDE PLAN/REZONING & PRELIMINARY PLAT
FOR FIRE STATION #5
G. Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment, Rezoning of Two Acres from
A to PF and Preliminary Plat Entitled Schindeldecker 1st Addition
for the Fire Station #5 Project --A public hearing was first held
at the January 26, 1988, meeting and then continued until the
February 25 APC meeting allowing neighborhood meetings to review
the specific location of the Fire Station relationship --to parking,
trees and other landscaping concerns. The APC is recommending
approval of the application.
For a copy of the revi ed report for the Advisory Planning
Commission, refer to pages 0 through-/ /
For a copy of the APC minutes, refer to page(s)
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the comprehensive
guide plan amendment, rezoning from (A) agricultural to (PF)
public facility and a preliminary plat entitled Schindeldecker 1st
addition for Fire Station #5.
Special Note: The APC minutes for this item will be included
with the Additional Information packet on Monday, February 29. •
CITY OF EAGAN
SUBJECT: COMPREHENSIVE GUIDE PLAN AMENDMENT,
REZONING, PRELIMINARY PLAT
(SCHINDELDECKER 1ST ADD./FIRE STATION 5)
APPLICANT: CITY OF EAGAN
LOCATION: NW 1/4, SECTION 32
EXISTING ZONING: AG (AGRICULTURAL)
DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: FEBRUARY 25, 1988
DATE OF REPORT: FEBRUARY 9, 1988
REPORTED BY: PLANNING & ENGINEERING
APPLICATION SUMMARY: Separate applications have been submitted
requesting a rezoning of 2 AG (Agricultural) acres to a P.F.
(Public Facilities) district and a preliminary plat for the
Schindeldecker 1st Addition. This plat consists of one lot for
the City's 5th fire station. The February 1980 and January 1987
Land Use maps designate this site as R-11 (Mixed Residential) and
D-1 (Single Family). Therefore a Comprehensive Guide Plan
Amendment will be necessary. The site is located between Hwy.
35-E and Galaxie Avenue approximately 1/4 mile south of Cliff
Road.
EXISTING CONDITIONS/SITE PLAN: This site is surrounded by the
Berkshire single family- addition on the west and south,
agricultural land on the east that abuts Galaxie Avenue, and R.B.
(Roadside Business) land to the north that was bisected from what
is now the Rahn Cliff Addition when the Hwy. 35-E land
acquisition took place. The topography gradually flows to the
south central portion of the site. Vegetation is rather
insignificant except for a tree stand near the western property
line that shields the adjacent home. These trees will not be
disturbed with this proposal. The existing farm house near the
northeast corner of the site will: be removed and the bituminous
road will need to be extended to the north slightly.
The building itself will be very similar to the station under
construction at Dodd and Diffley Roads. As with that building,
every attempt will be made to keep the station as far away from
the residential area as code setbacks allow. There may be some
minor shifts in the building pad location between now and the
Final Plat, however, the site configuration will remain the same.
City staff will prepare the landscape plan.
SCHINDELDECKER 1ST ADDITION/FIRE STATION #5
PAGE TWO
If the_project moves as quickly as anticipated, the Final Plat
package will be submitted in March and the plans and
specifications will be approved by the Council; then advertising
for bids will take place. The Final Plat should be approved in
early April and the construction contract will be awarded.
Construction will begin shortly after and completed in late
November of 1988.
REVISED PLANS: Since the January 26 APC meeting, staff met with
the architect three times regarding alternative site plans that
would address the neighborhood concerns. Three plans in addition
to the original were available for discussion purposes at the
neighborhood meeting held on February 8th. Approximately 16
people were in attendance. Pros and cons were mentioned for all
plans and it was a general concensus that 'Alternate Plan B' was
the most acceptable to all parties.. This plan will not destroy
most of the trees near the south edge of the driveway area and no
parking stalls will face the south. The additional needed stalls
will face the western property line, however, the natural ridge
will not be disturbed. In both areas, additional landscaping
will enhance the existing plant material. Emphasis will be
placed on screening the single family areas with a mixture of
over and .understory deciduous trees, pines and elevated shrub
beds --that -provide year round beauty.
GRADING/DRAINAGE/EROSION CONTROL: This two acre parcel has a 20
foot elevation differential as it slopes from the north to the
south. The proposed improvement of the fire station site would
include internal parking lot storm sewer facilities which would
convey this runoff into the existing 12" trunk storm sewer
outfall adjacent to the south boundaries of this development.
All other surface water drainage from the undisturbed areas will
continue in its present fashion to'a backyard catch basin inlet
structure located in the backyard areas of the single family
properties to the south. The existing storm -sewer facilities will
convey surface water runoff through the trunk storm sewer system
all the way to the Minnesota River. While an erosion and
sedimentcontrolplan has not been submitted with this plat
application, it will be incorporated into the detailed plans and
specifications for construction of the fire station itself.
UTILITIES: Sanitary sewer and water main of sufficient size,
capacity and depth are readily available along the south boundary
of this development to service the proposed fire station.
EASEMENTS/RIGHT-OF-WAY/PERMITS: The proposed access to this fire
station will incorporate the present driveway access along the
abandoned alignment of old Galaxie Avenue along the east
property line. The old Galaxie Avenue alignment has never had
public right-of-way officially dedicated or conveyed. Instead, a
33' half right--of-way from the centerline of the existing roadway
alignment has been prescribed to the public under the statutory
roadway legislation as -having been used and maintained by the
public for a continuous period exceeding seven years. This 33'
half right-of-way (2 rods) will incorporate approximately 17' of
this plat along the east property line. The proposed future fire
station site has been adequately set back from this 17' of public
use if it ever should be so dedicated in the future. However,
because this property will be under the ownership of the City of
Eagan, it is felt it is net necessary to formally dedicate this
as public right-of-way at this time to provide for flexibility
and discretion by the City in determining whether a future
upgraded roadway would ever be constructed along this alignment.
Due to the fact that all streets and utilities necessary to
service this development are properly located within public
right-of-way and/or easements, no additional- easements will be
re_quired. Similarly, no permits from any other governmental
agency beyond the City will be .necessary to develop this
property.
STREETS/ACCESS/CIRCULATION: -''Existing access to the fire station
will be by way of the existing bituminous driveway within old
Galaxie Avenue along the east property line connecting to the new
Galaxie Avenue at the southeast corner. However, it is
anticipated that at some future date when the adjacent property
to the east and north is developed, an internal public street.
will be constructed to provide access to a new intersection with
Galaxie Avenue opposite West Wind Trail. At that time, the.
present driveway access could be either eliminated or downgraded
to a secondary access..
The internal parking lot layout: and circulation pattern are
according to City standards.
ASSESSMENTS: This property has been previously assessed for
trunk area sanitary sewer and trunk area water under Project 254.
However, storm sewer accessed under Project 316 was only
calculated at the previous single family use. Because this
development is now being converted into a public facility zone
and fire station facility use, the following additional
assessments will be the obligation of this development as a
condition of _final plat approval:
DESCRIPTION QTY
Trunk Area Storm 54,122 sf(1)
Sewer(Unassessed area)
Trunk Area Storm
Sewer(Zoning Upgrade) 87,122 sf
Lateral Benefit from
Trunk Storm Sewer
365 if
TOTAL PROPOSED: ASSESSMENT
RATE AMOUNT PROJ
•$0.056/sf $3,031 316
$0.027/ f(2)2,352 316
$30.88/lf 11,271 316
$16,654
(1) Additional area previously unassessed due to large lot
single familyoredit.
(2) Difference in public facility and single family zoning rates
in accordance with 1988 fee schedule.
The ultimate assessment obligation will be calculated on the
final -plat information and rates in effect at the time of final
plat approval.
CONDITIONS:
1. These standard conditions of plat approval as adopted by
Council action on September 15, 1987 shall be complied 'with:
B-1, 2-2, C-3, C-4, D-1, and G-1.
2,.. This development shall accept its additional assessment
obligations as defined in the staff's report in accordance
with. the final plat dimensions and the rates in effect at
the time of final plat approval.
/70
A. STANDARD CONDITIONS of
Assessments PLAT APPROVAL
l This
development
s
ha:ll
accept
ccept i t
additional
d
d
°
na
l a
ss
e
s
t
m
e
with
n
to ligations as defined in
a�s report
ifinal p1t dimensions and the ratan effect at thethe
eof finalplat approval.
Easements Rights-of-WayThis development Sha dedicate 10' drainage ttOprivate propety or public right-of_Wayeasements centered °vera common lot
lines and adJacen2. This development shall dedicate, Provide, or flnanctallyBaits proportionate share the acquisition
additiOnal drainage,
ponding, and lliteasements as required by the alignment, depth, and
capacityfall required public utilities
tiiesandstrelocated beyond eondaof�toservicethidevepment,de dedicated. public right-of-way as necessary to
This development shall dedicateul publicriJu sdictionaada roadways asarideasements fr agency. required by the appropratei-t-of_Wayimatedeveoif4, This development shall dedicate quatedramagtedpondigeasements toincorporate the requiredadequate plans and Spcificati•nelevation
cessitated y storm
atrstorage volumerequirements
y
this
r
nt
ope
Cit
1. Al
registered
public
streets and
gistubl his development
Codes thissi elopment s necessary
:::::
dby staff sioi gnal ger bo gnhte
2. prior rdby fin and With Cit
City plan ed grading, draina plat appra�l.cies, and
approvai'edards and aep prepared gen accordance
ccord nn and se
3 public
This development Y staff prior to 1t current
accordance
CC c street shall ins al plat
4. A °rd s t With s City engineering
insure
that
all term
proposed lgda landscape glneering StandaadsCOnstrudead end
n
included
plat a trig plan plan Shall b
ant ed in grading
pia and approved be submitted
il one year Development financial y staff eprior °n the
after thedate of°trac� guarantee a1 the :.
installation. released
ete Sege.
C.
STANDARD CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL
PAGE TWO
5. A.11 internal p-ublic and private streets shall be
constructed within the required .right-of-way in
accordance with City design. standards.
D. Public Improvements
1._-_ Ifanypublic improvementsare to be installed under a
City contract, the appropriate project must be approved
by Council action prior to final plat approval.
E. Permits
1. This development shall be responsible for the acquisition
of all regulatory agency permits in the time frame
required by the affected agency.
F. Parks Dedication
1. This development shall fulfull its parks dedication
requirements as recommended by the Advisory Parks and
Recreation Commission and approved by Council action.
G. Other
1. All standard platting and zoning conditions shall be
adheredto unless specifically granted a variance by
Council action. -
Advisory Planning Commission City Council -
Approved: August 25., 1987 September 15, 1987
Revised.:
LTS#2
STANDARD
ZOiN11NG --
LOCATION
LAND USE:
-PF
CSC
• j(
C'S C
PC
:•
I';.t:.:rvur
V.
•
L _�� . / ;.^.f
S � :. Tlt K;, R.�
,
•/ I
- r.. /''.t. !.1,-Pd7,..
PK
CAn�TA cCUNTY
f.
\I \\
ll�.;;11.\
// w
((S
U(o
•
//
•
,
CLIFF ROAD
(CO. 110. 32)
r. ... " •••• 71!
• I
•
• •
•
••••••.;.. !k/tr;
,...4%1:7 •
. • ` • A 'O.'
4/I:r0"
01.111=1101MIIIIMMIN111111111•1'
LB -Limited Business
' :44-- • "
101101uncommoommuum aaleita
. . . — .
brda, aro., &um." Mane aoniam
.CmomoN.A.t.uscs
_ _ .
rirsieg day can, oge+mm. xr7vvte
Privet. cluta.. ronaulr.“. comeri scrsa '
COMPREHENSIVE SITE PLAN :
GALAXIE CLIFF PLAZA
'•ExistIng Comprehensive PlanYde'signatioti LB - Limited Business
Proposed ,zoning LB- Limited Business
TRI -LAND
SURVEYING CO.,INC.
/
211 "V2AOCK D re l
4.4
14,-0 r3t t ;,.A (Oc(::.
1 l ✓
-Xt
Y:L�
1
R:CuFi:::FF ,P4FX--1
1. S,,K PT 2 • SALLY 34
2. a44C PT t3. 0a<951,41
4AJ�
4 7464 P• • 5 Ta55
5. I•_9•1C5T(AU PT 16- 50949L
6 C Sa:[ __ PT :' u;29.4 PT
- 7. 6433811.2. Pi. 16- L,FA Pi
6-6,7774 Pt •9 69,4t74 $
9 • 71(4474 P „„J. STAYER/. ,.
II0.44.044MPT 21 -ALTA Pi'
• NfluSx Pi.
el
Agenda- .Information Memo
March 1, 1988, City Council Meeting
ADOPTION OF TWO YEAR & FIVE YEAR ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ACT
H. Adoption of Two and Five Year Economic Development Plan --Each
year the Economic Development Commission reviews the two and five
year action plan. Most of the items on this plan have been
reviewed or given direction by the City Council. At the last EDC
meeting held on Tuesday, February 23, 1988, both the two and five
year action plans were given approval. The action plans are
intended to become a guideline for work tasks that impact
economic development within the community. The City will also,
if given a favorable action by the City Council, include the
action plans as a part of the Star City recertification scheduled
for 9:00 a.m., Thursday, March 10.
Several of the work tasks outlined on the action plan require
specific fact finding, reasearch and deliberation by the Economic
Development Commission. Many of the other work tasks are simply
monitored by the EDC with the understanding that either City
staff, Planning Commission or Chamber of Commerce has greater
authority for review with the City Council. In any event, all
work tasks are economic development related and pertain to the
two and five year economic development action plan for the City.
Enclosed on pages I c2 0 through 1 1
five year action plans as referenced.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny both
the two year and five year action plan for economic development.
are copies of the two and
1988-89
EAGAN TWO-YEAR ACTION PLAN
WORK TASKS
ASSIGNMENT
COMPLETION DATE STATUS
1. Update Five -Year
Capital Improvement
Plan
2. Review_ inancing and
Economic Development
Tools inclucing TIF,
EDA's and Revolving
Loan Funds.
3. Review Zoning Classes/
Freeway Zoning
4. Upgrade County/
City Collector Streets
5. 24 Hour Emergency
Care Center
6. Update Star City Faet
Book, Slide Set &
Promotional Materials
7. Perform Business
Retention Program
City Administrator Dec.
City Staff, Public
Works Department
8. Monitor Airport
Adequacy Developments
9. Acquire Senior
Housing Site
10. Perform Comprehensive.
Commercial Study
11. Perform Comprehensive
Transportation Study
12. Perform Transit
Opt Out Study
EDC, City Council
City Planner,.
City Staff, APC
Public Works Dept.,
Dakota County
•
,_1988-_ _To_be
Completed
July 1, 1988 In Progress
Jan. 1, 1989 In Progress
Jan. 1, 1990 Ongoing
EDC, City Council, July
Chamber of Commerce
City Staff, EDC, -
Chamber of Commerce
City Staff, EDC,
Chamber of Commerce
, 1989 Partially
Completed
Nov. 1, 1988 In Progress
Feb.. 1, 1989' To be
Completed
City Staff 'J -an. 1, 1990
HRA, City Staff
City Staff,
Consultant
City Staff,
Consultant
City Staff,
Consultant
Ongoing:
Sept. 1, 1988 To be
Completed
May 1, 1988 To be
Completed
June 1, 1988 In Progress
Oct, 1, 1988 To be
Completed
1988-89
EAGAN FIVE-YEAR ACTION PLAN
WORK TASKS
ASSIGNMENT
COMPLETION DATE STATUS
1. Monitor Retail
Development Patterns
2. Construct Eagan
Community Center
3. Promote Seneca.
Treatment Plant
Expansion
4. Develop Commercial -
Industrial Databases
5 Identify and Study
Redevelopment Needs
6. Assess Airport Noise
Impacts and
Alternatives
7. Monitor Electric Rates
8. Concept Plan for
Senior Life Style
Housing
9. Monitor Census
Demographic Results
Chamber of
Commerce, EDC
City Council
City Staff
City Council
Public Works
Director; EDC
City Staff
City Planner
City Administrator
City Staff
City Staff
City Administrator
Chamber of
Commerce
EDC, City Staff
Chamber of
Commerce
1988-1992
1989-1990
1989
1988-1990
1988-1989
1988-1992
1988-1992
1988-1989
City Staff 1990-1992
In Progress
In Progress
In Progress
In Progress
To be
Completed
In Progress
In Progress
In Progress
To be
Completed
Agenaa lnrorination ilemo
March 1, 1988, City Council Meeting
,ADDITIONA1 ITEMS -
PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT CONTRACTS
A. Public Improvement Contracts:
Item 1.
Contract
February
existing
the new
Enclosed
showing
Center.
Radio Communications Contract, Receive Bids/Award
(Existing Mobile Radio -Modifications) --At 10:00 a.m. on
18, 1988, formal bids were received to modify 13
mobile radios and three base facilities to conform to
updated radio communication system within the City.
on page /23 is a tabulation of the bids received
the low bid of $1,067 was. submitted by Communications
These bids have been reviewed by the City's radio
communications consulting engineer and found to be in
compliance with the specifications and the City's budget.
Therefore, it is recommended that the contract be awarded to the
low bidder, Communications Center, in the amount of $1,067.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM To receive the bids for
contract (existing mobile radio
contract to Communications Center in
the radio communications
modifications) and award the
the amount of $1,067.
(aa
CITY OF EAGAN
RADIO COMMUNICATIONS UPGRADE CONTRACT
MOBILE RADIO MODIFICATIONS
Bid Opening: 11:00 A.M. C.D.S.T.
Bid Date: February 18, 1988
BIDDER
1. Communications Center
2. Capital Electronics
3. Contact Mobile Communications, Inc.
4. Johnson Radio Communications, Inc.
5. Two -Way Radio Company
6. General Communications Company
TOTAL BASE BID
$1,067.00
1,125.00/$1,671.00
1,132.50
1,185.00
1,387.50
2,094.00
Agenda Information Memo
March 1, 1988, City Council Meeting
Item 2. Contract 87-24, Approve Change Order #2 (Stafford Place
Trunk Utilities —Completion of Contract 87 -6) --Contract 87-6
provided for the installation of a storm sewer lift station from
Berry Patch Park in the Hilltop Addition (Pond JP -7) which was
originally awarded to S.J. Lewis, Inc. The Change Order
presented herein consists of two parts described as follows:
PART A: During the design of the lift station, the high water
elevation precluded the ability to determine the actual
shoreline configuration. Subsequently, upon pumping
the -pond down to its controlled elevation, it was•_
determined that the inlet pipe to the lift station had
to be extended approximately 20' to confox m to the new
exposed natural shoreline of this park pond.
($2,-120.82)
PART B: This provides for the completion of the trailway
construction and appropriate restoration around this.
facility. ($4,203)
Because of the original contractor's inability and/or
unwillingness to complete the contractual obligations regarding
trailway reconstruction and restoration, liquidated damages are
being assessed under the provisions of Contract 87-6. Because of
the assessment of these_ liquidated damages, that contractor
refused to consider accepting the additional work of extending
the inlet pipe for additional negotiated compensation.
Subsequently, in order to complete this project in a timely
manner, the staff requested J.P. Norex, Inc., to perform this
work as a change order to Contract 87-24 for the above -referenced
prices. All costs associated with this project will be the
responsibility of the trunk storm sewer fund, offset by
unexpended funds under the original contract (87-6) and/or
financed through the levying of liquidated damages under Contract
87-6.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve Change Order #2
for Contract 87-24 (incompleted work for Contract 87-6) in the
amount of $6,323.82 and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to
execute all related documents.
Item 3. Project 510 Approve City/County Joint Participation
Agreement (Cliff Road - Johnny Cake Ridge Road to Pilot Knob
Road) --The City has received a formal agreement for the joint
design and cost participation for that portion of County Road 32
(Cliff Road from.Johnny Cake Ridge Road to Pilot Knob Road) as
approved at the public hearing for Project 510 held on January 5,
1988. This agreement is in conformance with previous agreements
with similar joint City/County road improvements and has-been
reviewed by the City Attorney and Public Works Director and found
to be in order for favorable Council action.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve joint
City/County agreement for Project 510 (Cliff Road - Johnny Cake, -
Ridge Road to Pilot Knob Road) and authorize the Mayor and City
Clerk to execute all related documents.
MEMO TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY-..COUNCILMEMBERS
FROM: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES
DATE: FEBRUARY 24, 1988
SUBJECT: INFORMATIVE
FIRE DEPARTMENT MONTHLY REPORT
Enclosed on page
Department monthly resort.
is a copy of the January 1988 Fire
CABLE COMMISSION ALTERNATE APPOINTMENT
At the January organizational meeting Mr. Jeffrey Larson was
appointed as an alternate to the Joint Burnsville/Eagan Cable
Commission. Mr. Larson has since advised the City that he is
unable to accept the commission appointment. Since no additional
names appeared on the Cable Commission ballot other than those
that .received appointment, direction to the City Administrator is
required on a method to fill this vacancy. As a suggestion, the
City Council could advertise this vacancy or direct the City
Administrator to contact residents who were not appointed and ask
if anyone would consider the vacancy.
CITY ENGINEERS ASSOCIATION OF MINNESOTA
Enclosed on pages -�-L�— through is a copy of a letter,
resolution and support :information asking that cities support the
highwayfunding recommendations of the Transportation Finance
Study Commission. The two primary recommendations are that the
gasoline tax be increased by 3 cents per gallon, effective June
1, 1988, and that the share of the motor -vehicle excise tax
revenues going to transportation be increased from the present 5%
to 350.
The Director ofPublicWorks and City Administrator have
reviewed the intent of the resolution and action and find its
purpose to be consistant with our community's needs for increased
funding for the reconstruction and updating of various county
roads within our city. If there is City Council direction to
further consider this item, it will be placed on either the
consent agenda or regular agenda onMarch15.
REVOCATION OF COUNTY ROADS 23 AND 63A
The City has received a letter from the Dakota County Highway
Engineer stating that the Dakota County Board of Commissioners
passed a resolution revoking County Roads 23 and 63A. County
Road 23, Nicols Road, and County Road 63A, Becker Road, are now
Eagan city streets.
las
CITY TOWING
At the last City Council meeting held on February 16, 1988, Mr.
Kevin Mellon, Magnum Towing, appeared and requested continuance
of his conditional use permit to allow impounding of cars and
also a request that consideration be given to allow his company
to bid on towing vehicles that are authorized And directed the
City Police Department. Enclosed on pages 3 X through f is
a memo prepared by our Operations Cap±ain, Ken Aszmann,
addressing both issues.
PROTECTIVE INSPECTIONS MONTHLY REPORT/JANUARY
Enclosed on pages Iv through is a copy of the Protective
Inspections monthly report for January 1988.
STATUS UPDATE FOR ASSISTED HOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
Enclosed on pages (4 /through // is a copy of the status
report for Dakota County as it relates to assisted housing and
community development.
/S/ Thomas L. Hedges
EAGAN FIRE DEPARTMENT
MONTHLY REPORT FOR January,' 1988
Fire/Rescue - '
Training
Truck & Equipment Mai nt.
Station Maintenance 111
Fire Prevention
Administrative
TOTAL
Available Nights
Available Days ---_4__
Available Days & Nights 3
Available Rotating
On Leave
Rookies
TOTAL
Structure
Grass
Vehicle
Fal se
Medical
Other
3
A
9
14
1
$ 0
STAJI ON #3
":r
NAME `
-_-_-- Lp c A.OC.CUpANCY. ;4: _LOSS
None
11
F-Mnnthlv-Rennrt 11/R7
February 10, 1988
CITY ENGINEERS ASSOCIATION
of MINNESOTA
TO: Mayors, Councilmembers, City Administrators,
City Clerks, and City Engineers
RE: Highway Funding,
At the City Engineers Association of Minnesota annual business meeting on
January 21, 1988, the need for additional monies to preserve existing roadways,
reconstruct roads as necessary, and complete construction of the roadway system
was discussed. A motion was passed supporting the highway funding
recommendations of the Transportation Finance Study -Commission. The
recommendations are outlined in the enclosed document. The two primary
recommendations are that the gasoline tax be increased by three cents per gallon
effective June 1, 1988, and that --the share of the motor vehicle excise tax
(MVET) revenues going to transportation be increased from the present 5% to 35%.
The motion -directed that cities be informed of this position of the City
Engineers Association of Minnesota, and be asked to take action supporting this
position. Mayors, councilmembers, administrators and other individual
representatives" of cities are also requested to contact their legislators to
ask them for their support of the recommendations of the Transportation Finance
Study Commission.
A sample resolution is enclosed for your consideration. Your support of this
very essential funding increase for transportation is encouraged.
Yours truly,
Ronald L. Rudrud, P.E.
Vice President, CEAM
RLR/an
Sample Resolution
RESOLUTION #
WHEREAS, there is a need for additional funding for highways to preserve
the existing roadways, reconstruct roads as necessary, and complete the
incomplete system of roadways; and
WHEREAS, the 1981 Minnesota State Legislature directed that the motor
vehicle excise tax (MVET) be transferred to Transportation by increasing
increments of 25% percent per biennium beginning with 1984-85 biennium and
ending with the total transfer in the 1990-91 biennium; and
WHEREAS, the 1981 Legislative law directed that of the amounts transferred
to Transportation, 75% go to the Highway Users Tax Distribution Fund (HUTDF) and
25% to the Transit Assistance Fund (TAF); and
WHEREAS, the 1983 Legislature, reacting to the State's general fund
shortfall, delayed the MVET transfer to the 1986-87 biennium; and
'WHEREAS, the 1984 Legislature modified the schedule by advancing the first
phase of transfer to the year 1985 and was to continue through the 1986-87
biennium; and
WHEREAS, the 1986 Legislature acted to eliminate the transfer of MVET funds
for the 1986-87 biennium; and
WHEREAS, the 1987 Legislature acted to eliminate the transfer of MVET funds
for the 1988-89 biennium; and
WHEREAS, the roadway systems under the jurisdiction of State, County, City
and Township can no longer be maintained to minimal standards utilizing current
funding; and
WHEREAS, the liveability of Minnesota is highly dependent upon its
transportation system of which the roadway system is the major artery; and
WHEREAS, a major portion of the roadway system in the state is over 40
years old and in need of major repairs or reconstruction; and
WHEREAS, the roadway systems will continue to deteriorate at a faster rate
than current funds will provide for future repairs or reconstruction; and
WHEREAS, the major issue is to provide sufficient funds to meet the needs
of the total transportation system within the State of Minnesota; and
WHEREAS, the Transportation Finance Study Commission has made
recommendations to provide additional funding.
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY OF
that the city strongly endorses the State Legislature providing additional
funding for transportation; and
FURTHER, since the Transportation Finance Study Commission recommendations
will provide such additional funding, the State Legislature is encouraged to
consider adoption of their recommendations as outlined in the Transportation
Finance Study Commission's working draft document dated January 7, 1988.
PASSED by the city council of this
day of , 1988.
1r17I2t , l +_�i;L ,11(k)A Z `l
\l I TlaI r IC f L- -AA/j (i � c"-{-t 4K\ <2.1E.--, �J ✓ �� L� . ('t?,-tit 11144 C (.1
i �•� , v�
Lt� ': �
rf l T -. sic
c,'r b-e-1 {vl,✓tcj 4t �r�; I. COMMISSION BACKGROUND
The Transportation Finance Study Commission was created as part of the Transportation and Semi-States
1988-89 appropriation bill enacted in the 1987 legislative session. That legislation directed the
Commission to study:
1. Present and future highway and transit needs.
2, The adequacy of existing revenue sources to meet those needs.
3. Methods of raising additional revenue.
4. Alternatives to raising revenue.
5, Alternative methods of distributing revenues among various levels of government.
The Commission was directed to report its findings and recommendations to the legislature by February
15, 1988.
The following members of the legislature were appointed to the Commission:
Senator Gary DeCramer
Senator Keith Langseth
Senator Marilyn Lantry
Senator Lyle Mehrkens
Senator Clarence Purfeerst
Representative
Representative
Representative
Representative
Representative
Doug Carlson
Bob Jensen
Henry Kalis
Bernie Lieder
Art Seaberg
At the Commission's first meeting Senator Purfeerst and Representative Kalis were selected to serve as
co-chairs.
IL COMMISSION ACTIVITIES
The Commission's first meeting was in the State Capitol and provided essential background on the
developments which had led to the Commission's creation. Rep. Bob Vanasek, Speaker of the House,
testified on the scope of the Commission's work, a subject also addressed in a statement provided by
Senator Roger Moe, Senate majority leader, and Governor Rudy Perpich. Transportation Commissioner
Leonard Levine spoke on the changes which the Department of Transportation were forced to make as a
result of funding shortfalls after the 1987 legislative session. The next three meetings, also in the
Capitol, focused on state and local highway and transit needs and also heard a report on the Legislative
Auditor's study of county state -aid distribution.
The Commission then began a series of hearings at locations around the state in an attempt to obtain a
sense of what the public expected and demanded of the legislature in terms of transportation service and
willingness to finance that service. Meetings were held in Shakopee, Richfield, Two Harbors, Breezy
Point, Mankato and Marshall. All these meetings were characterized by heavy attendance (several to the
point of capacity) and public testimony from more than 150 persons. While the testimony covered a
broad range of transportation subjects almost all of it spoke to the public's awareness of the
importance of transportation to the state's economic health.'
The specific points brought out most frequently in these hearings may be summarized as follows:
1. The motoring public is willing to pay for the support of highways as long as it can be sure that
the money will actually go for highway improvements and maintenance.
'31
P.age 2
2. The motor vehicle excise tax (MVET) is a highway user tax and should be treated like other
highway user taxes -- that is, dedicated to transportation.
3. Throughout the state people have been waiting many years for highway improvements and are
becoming impatient with what they see as endless delays.
4. `In rural areas weight restrictions on highways are a serious impediment to economic growth and
add significantly to the costs borne by many segments of the economy, particularly those related
to agriculture and manufacturing.
5. Public transit is a subject of vital importance to a sizeable segment of the population, and there
is strong support among these people for expanded use of MVET funds for transit as well as for
highways.
6. Local elected officials are particularly appreciative of the local bridge bonding program and hope
it can be continued.
7. People generally believe that Minnesota's highways are in fundamentally good condition but can
and must be improved in areas of capacity and safety.
The Commission completed its work with an examination of the costs and benefits of credit Financing for
highways, then began its consideration of its final report.
III. SCOPE OF THE COMMISSION'S WORK
The overall charge given to the Transportation Finance Study Commission was an extremely broad one.
If taken literally it would require several years of study, debate and public testimony to cover
adequately. Given the limited amount of time available to the Commission it was necessary for us to
concentrate primarily on the most pressing issues of transportation finance and to look specifically for
recommendations to be made to the 1988 legislative session. This meant that we have been unable to
formulate a plan for resolving transportation financing questions beyond the 1990-91 biennium.
This decision was not made easily. One of the major problems facing transportation today is the fact
that many of its financing decisions have been made on a short-term basis which inhibits long-range
planning and leads to public confusion and frustration. To the public the practice of scheduling highway
projects and then cancelling them appears as bad management and bad planning when in fact it is the
inevitable result of short-term decision making. Nonetheless we determined that our first responsibility
in fulfilling the legislature's charge was to seek out the public's views on the kind of transportation
system it wants and is willing to pay for. This concentration.. on learning what the public expects from
the 1988 Legislative session made it impracticable for us to conduct the kind of in-depth hearings
necessary to formulating a long-term proposal.
Even with this limitation we believe that the recommendations in this report will provide a foundation
on which a more permanent solution can be constructed.
IV. COMMISSION FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
The Commission believes that the most immediate transportation needs facing the 1988 legislative _.
session are:
(1) the restoration of the Minnesota Department of Transportation's highway improvement program
Page 3
for the 1988-89 biennium to its level before the August, 1987, project deferrals were announced,
and
(2) the restoration of state public transit assistance at least to its 1986-1987 level.
In both these areas the fundamental issue is one of commitment. The first responsibility of the
legislature in financing transportation should be to avoid retreating on the state's commitment to a
highway system adequate to sustain economic development in Minnesota and a transit system which
provides a basic level of mobility for a substantial portion of the state's people. Both, those objectives
have been compromised by recent legislative actions. The reasons for those actions need not be debated
here, but we feel that it is now time for the legislature to resolve, or at least alleviate, the problems
raised by those actions. Only when the cutbacks of recent years in both highways and transit have
been addressed can the legislature begin seriously to restore its full commitment to an adequate
transportation system.
The magnitude of the cutbacks in the highway development program did not become fully apparent until
August, 1987, when the Department of Transportation announced that 36 highway projects with a total
cost of about $96 million, originally scheduled for contract letting during the 1988-89 biennium, would be
indefinitely postponed. These deferrals were made unavoidable when the 1987 legislature reduced from
50% to 5% the share of Motor Vehicle Excise Tax (MVET) revenues going to transportation in this
biennium. This had the effect of reducing the Trunk Highway Fund's share of the MVET revenue from
about 23% to about 2%, requiring a cutback in the highway improvement program. A failure to increase
the share of MVET revenue going to transportation in the 1990-91 biennium beyond the 5% level (a 75%
level was provided in the original MVET transfer Legislation) will necessitate another round of project
deferrals, amounting to approximately $150 million, in that biennium as well.
The present leve! of state assistance to public transit is also characterized by cutbacks which, while
perhaps less dramatic than those in -the highway area, nonetheless are symptomatic of a declining state
commitment to transit. Appropriations for transit assistance for the 1988-89 biennium were some
$500,000 less than actual state spending for the same purposes in- the previous biennium, and some $3
million below the original appropriation for that biennium. This continues a pattern of maintaining state
support for transit at an essentially unchanged level throughout the 1980s, a pattern which when
combined with flat farebox revenue and declining federal aid has made transit throughout the state
increasingly dependent on property taxes to meet rising costs. The opportunity to attract new riders to
transit and to make it more effective in meeting the transportation needs of rapidly -growing areas is
being lost.
At a time when Minnesota is making major efforts to enhance economic development in all parts of the
state a transportation program which is characterized by reductions, delays and uncertainties is clearly
counterproductive. The fust step toward making transportation part of the solution instead of part of
the problem must be to take major steps toward restoring the cutbacks of the past year. To help
accomplish this the Commission recommends the following actions:
Recommendation No, 1, The state zasoline tax should he increased by three cents per Qallon, effective
June 1, 1988,
The gasoline tax has been the foundation of state highway financing for over fifty years, and we
believe it is an essential part of any highway financing package in 1988 as well. The gasoline tax is the
one tax where payments for most taxpayers are most closely related to actual highway use, so that it is
widely viewed not simply as another tax but as part of the overall cost of motoring. As long as the
gasoline tax is dedicated solely to highway purposes it has widespread public acceptance, and we believe
that the public is willing to pay such a tax as the price of improving the highway system to meet the
demands of its users.
Page 4
In increasing its gasoline tax (which has been unchanged since January 1, 1984) Minnesota would be
following a clear national trend which has seen eighteen states increase their gasoline taxes since
September 1, 1986. Among these states is Wisconsin, which in 1987 increased its tax to 20 cents per
gallon. We expect that a number of other states will adopt increases in 1988, including possibly Iowa
where the state Transportation Commission has proposed raising that state's 16 cent tax by three cents.
Recommendation No, 2. The share of Motor Vehicle Excise Tax revenues going to transportation should
increa. ed fr:in the .re ent t•
.:
As has been noted, many persons who testified before the Commission felt strongly that the excise tax
on motor vehicles is as much of a highway user tax as are the gasoline tax and motor vehicle license
taxes, and should be dedicated to highways just as those taxes are. We believe that this testimony is
representative of a sizeable portion of public opinion. The fact that many people believe that the MVET
was always dedicated to highways, and that the legislature in 1983 took it away from highways and has
refused to give it back, reflects not so much an erroneous view of the legislative history of MVET as a
deep-seated sense that an MVET dedication to highways is fair and equitable.
The Commission agrees with this public sense. Additional funds are needed if transportation is ever to
become a stimulus for economic development, and the excise tax must be an essential component of a
funding package. We recognize the strong feeling on the part of many members of the legislature that
they cannot accept an increase in the gasoline tax without a substantial increase in the share of MVET
going to highways.
We further believe that both sound policy and the necessity of public acceptance of any funding package
require that the present division of MVET's transportation share between highways and transit (75% to
highways, 25% to transit) be retained.
The excise tax is of particular importance as the legislature is faced with proposals to reexamine
highway jurisdiction in Minnesota. Because it is free of constitutional requirements for its distribution
among state and local governments the excise tax is the only potential highway user tax with the
flexibility to finance transfers of highways among jurisdictions.
The additional 30% transfer would increase the total share of the excise tax going to transportation to
35%. The 30% figure was selected in order to keep the proposal within the realm of feasibility given the
fiscal realities facing the next legislative session and also to provide a rough parity in the total package
between MVET revenue and gasoline tax revenue.
Table I shows the anticipated revenue from the Commission's transportation financing proposal. The
trunk highway share will be sufficient eventually to restore all the projects deferred from the current
biennium's highway improvement plan and avoid more than 80% of the probable deferrals in the next
biennium. While this package does not go as far as some of us would like in providing revenue for state
highways we feel that it is the largest highway funding package which can realistically be presented to
the legislature.
The total amount which the package will raise for statewide transit assistance over the next three
years is about $52.1 million, or an average of $17.4 million per year. It will be up to the legislature to
determine how much of this money will be used to augment present transit appropriations from till
general fund and how much will be used to replace those general fund appropriations. The Commission
recommends that whatever this decision is, the following financing objectives should be met:
1. The dedication of revenue from driver license fees which was used to supplement transit
appropriations in the 1988-89 biennium should be repealed for fiscal 1989, and that money be
provided from the new MVET revenues going into the transit assistance fund (the dedication is
Page 5
scheduled to expire at the end of fiscal 1989). Driver license fee revenue should properly be
used to finance the driver licensing system and ought not to be used permanently as a revenue -
raising device. Repeal of this dedication will require about $43 million in MVET funds for
fiscal 1989.
2. The new MVET money should also be used to provide the additional funds needed to maintain the
Metro Mobility program through the rest of the biennium at its present level of service. The
increased demand for this service will force it to run out of money before the end of the
biennium unless its appropriation is supplemented or service cut back. The amount which the
Regional Transit Board is presently requesting for the Metro Mobility supplement is $7.2 million.
These two objectives will require about $11.5 million in fiscal 1989. The Commission hopes that the
legislature will find it possible to use the remainder of the additional MVET revenues going to the
Transit Assistance Fund as supplemental rather than replacement funds, so that the state- can make a
meaningful renewal of its commitment to transit as a vital public service.
While the Commission believes that this program will mark and end to a policy of retreat in the face of
transportation problems and a start toward a permanent solution, it is by no means a complete plan.
There is a need for a long-range plan to define Minnesota's real transportation needs and to formulate
methods of meeting those needs, including long-term sources of financing. Our final recommendation
calls for a process for developing such a plan.
Recommendation No, 3, The legislature should create a Transportation Studv Board to Dm) are a long-
range study of transportation needs and funding,
Such a board ought to consist of both legislators and a broad cross-section of the public, including_
representatives of business, labor, manufacturing, agriculture, tourism and other major highway users. It
should be given sufficient time, staff and resources to make a thorough study of transportation needs
both, today and over the next twenty year and to develop a plan to meet those needs. Such a plan will
necessarily be a. compromise between the desires of all highway users and the ability of the state to
make those desires a reality, but it is hoped that the board's studies will be aimed primarily at achieving
a transportation system which will be a positive force for encouraging economic development and
expanding public mobility.
Specifically, we recommend that as part of its studies the board should consider:
1. The possible use of tolls for financing major highway improvements.
2. The costs and benefits of further borrowing to finance highway and bridge improvements.
3. The role of town roads in the state's overall road system and the appropriate level of state
highway user tax revenue which should go for town roads and bridges.
4. The possible restoration of the Minnesota Department of Transportation's exemption from the
state sales tax, and the exemption from the Motor Vehicle Excise Tax previously enjoyed by
both Mn/DOT and local units of government.
5. The use of wheelage taxes as a measure for financing local road and street improvements.
6. The desirability of amending the Minnesota Constitution to provide permanent dedication to
transportation purposes of some portion of MVET revenues.
7. The abandonment of the present per -gallon basis for the gasoline tax and its replacement by a
Page 6
tax indexed to fuel consumption, fuel prices, construction or maintenance costs or some other
variable.
S. The feasibility and desirability of imposing a sales tax on motor fuel, either at the retail or
wholesale level.
9. The . future of financing major highway improvements through a sharing of the cost between
public agencies and benefited economic development centers.
10. The use of the State Transportation Plan as a mechanism for guiding future transportation
investment.
While the focus of the board's studies would be on transportation it is our intention that it consider
transportation spending within a broader context of overall state spending. The events of recent years
indicate that transportation spending, and particularly highway spending, can no longer be considered in
a vacuum apart from other state programs and commitments. The sooner such a broad context is
achieved the more likely it is that the present uncertainties and policy shifts can be replaced by the
funding stability needed to carry out any long-range plan.
L
REVENUES FRUM_TRANSFCRTATICN FINANCE STUOT COMMISSION RECOMMENDATIONS
19,19 1990 1991 1990-91 Biennium
MOTOR VEHICLE EXCISE TAX (ADOITICNAL 30% TRANSFER)
Total MVET revenue 221,800,000 231,559,000 241,748,000 473,307,000
30X of NVET revenue 66,540,000 69,467,700 72,524,400 141,992,100
Transit share 16,635,000. 17,366,925 18,131,100 35,498,025
Metro 13,308,000 13,893,544 14,504,880 28,398,420
Non -metro 3,327,000 3,473,385 3,626,220 7,099,605
Highway share 49,905,000 52,100,775 54,393,300 106,494,075
Trunk Highway Fund 30,691,575 32,041,977 33,451,880 65,493,856
Co. State -Aid Find 14,771,880 15,421,829 16,100,417 31,522,246
Counties 14,594,617 15,236,767 15,907,212 31,143,979
Town 177,263 185,062 193,205 378,267
Mun. State -Aid Fund 4,441,545 4,636,969 4,841,004 9,477,973
3 CERT GASOLIME TAX INCREASE
Net per penny 20,682,706 20,663,588 20,583,882 41,247,471
Net from 3 tants 62,048,118 61,990,765 61,751,647 123,742,412
Trunk Highway Fun! 38,159,592 38,124,320 37,977,263 76,101,583
Co. State -Aid Fund 18,366,243 18,349,266 18,278,488 36,627,754
Counties 18,145,848 18,129,075 18,059,146 36,188,221
Towns 220,395 220,191 219,342 439,533
Mut. State -Aid Fund 5,522,282 5,517,178 5,495,897 11,013,075
TOTAL ADDITIONAL REVENUE
Trunk Highway Fund 68,851,167 70,166,297 71,429,142 141,595,439
County State -Aid fund 33,138,123 33,771,096 34,378,904 68,150,000
Counties 32,740,465 33,365,843 33,966,357 67,332,200
Towns 397,657 405,253 412,547 817,800
Mtn. State -Aid Fund 9,963,827 10,154,147' 10,336,900 • 20,491,047
Metro Transit 13,308,000 13,893,540 14,504,880 28,398,420
Mon -Metro Transit 3,327,000 3,473,385 3,626,220 7,099,605
Total 161,726,240 165,229,560 165,229,560
Pp?
police department
JAY M, BERTHE
Chiof of Police
PATRICK J. GEAGAN
AdmInisvoUve Captain
���� ®� ����.� KENNETH D. ASZMANN
Operations Capld n
3830 Pilot Knob Road
Eagan, Minnesota 55122
19 February, 1988
TD: TDM HEDGES
FROM: CAPTAIN ASZMANN
SUBJECT: CITY TOWING
I understand that Kevin Mellon (Magnum Towing) appeared at the
Council Meeting Tuesday night in reference to his conditional use
permit and to request he be allowed to bid on our towing.
In reference to his conditional use permit, if it applies to his
storage lot at 4861 Biscayne Avenue, we had complaints from his
neighbor to the north, Bloomington Cartage, of numerous people
coming to their business trying to get their cars from his
impound lot (see Citizen's Request dated 2/4/86). Since that
time I am not aware of any further problems at that ---location.
The city has received at least two and possibly more -complaints
from Mr. Melton's neighbors on Diamond Drive that his trucks wake
them at night when he frequently leaves for tows. They feel Mr.
Mellon is running a business from his residence, the telephone
number in- the phone directory for Magnum Towing is 454-2460.
This phone number lists to 4333 Diamond Drive-.
In the other matter, Mr. Mellon wishes to bid on our towing. In
the past two years, you, Chief Berthe, Mr. Mellon, his attorney
and I met upstairs to discuss the problems we had with Magnum
Towing and the reason we dropped them from our list of tow
companies, the specific problems discussed were:
1. Mr. Mellon had a conditional use permit for his business on
Hwy. #49, but lost the property when U.P.S. purchased the
land, Mr. Mellon then went to Schwendeman Inc. at 4895 South
Robert Trail until he had problems there because they did not
have the proper permits to store vehicles and failure to pay
rent. He then purchased the property at 4861 Biscayne Avenue
and requested a special use permit for that property.
2. Mr. Mellon was given the necessary paperwork to fill out for
the property on Biscayne, the council placed a couple of
requirements on the permit, one being that the lot must have
a security fence.
THE LONE OAK TREE. ..THE SYMBOL OF STRENGTH AND GROWTH IN OUR COMMUNITY
CITY TOWING
Page 2
Mr. Mellon appeared before the council for approval of his
permit and stated that the requirements were completed , when
in -fact, only a portion of the fence was erected. The
Planning Department asked us to check the property which I
did and found the fence incomplete. When asked about why the
fence was not completed, he stated, "The ground is frozen and
he couldn't finish the fence." He, in fact, lied to the
council.
�. When Mr. Mellon purchased the property I told him, if he was
going to use it as an impound Tot for our towing,: it would
have to be secure, and because he would not have an office at
that location he would have to post a sign identifying the
lot as Magnum Towing, the hours of operation, and a phone
number he could be contacted at. Mr. Mellon did not. do this.
I personally inspected the property several times over a
period of weeks to see if it was done. We, by then, received
a complaint from Bloomington Cartage in reference to numerous
persons bothering them to get their cars. released and/or use
their phone. (See Citizen's Request Form dated 2/4/86).
4. We had a couple of problems with him releasing cars during
the day because he di_d not have an office at his impound lot.
One incident was an insurance agent trying to contact him to
'make arrangements to have a car removed. Another was a
private citizen trying to get his car from the -lot. In both
cases, they either called or stopped by several times and no
one was there to release the cars.
Mr. Mellon towed a car for us and while picking _it up pulled
on an outside mirror and broke it off.- When the owner picked
up his car he asked Mr. Mellon about it. Mr. Mellon said he
-found it alongside the car when he picked it up. The citizen
came to the Police Department to complain about the damage
and while checking it out, the officer at the scene, Officer
Kasat, stated that he observed Mr. Mellon use the mirror to
get up from the ground -'end tore the mirror off. When Mr.
Mellon was advised that Officer Kasat saw him break the
mirror he still -denied it, but agreed to make restitution to
the citizen.
Because of the above problems with Magnum Towing I decided we
couldn't use his service and opted to stay with Lehman's
Garages.
CITY TOWING
Page 3
Since taking over Cedarvale•Auto, Lehman's has done an
outstanding job in cleaning up their property on Seneca Road,
keepingtrack of autos towed by us and providing us with
several newer trucks to better serve us. Marks Towing's main
base is located in Richfield, however, he now tows for all
three Lehman Garages and continues to use Lehman's, in Eagan,
for our impound lot. He has a local telephone number and an
additional_ night number for call outs. When we call for a
tow we, as in the past, still call Lehman's and when cars are
released they are still released from Lehman's who is
centrally located to a vast number of cars we tow so it is
very easy to advise most people where to go to release their
cars.
In response to .Lehman's conditional use permit, I have
checked with Jim Strum in Planning and he and Mr. Runkle have
reviewed the permit and feel it is in proper order. I also
checked with City Clerk, Gene VanOverbeke, about Mr. Mellon's
request- to be reinstated as a tow company and the fact that
Mark's is now towing for us. It was his opinion that the city
has no obligation or contract with -any towing firm and we
reserve the right to use the company who best serves the
city's best interest, -at which time happens to be Mark's.
In conclusion, we are quite pleased with the service
provided, at this time, by Mark's Towing and would recommend
continuing to use his service. We were unhappy with Magnum
Towing and because of the problems we encountered with him,
would not like to reestablish his service.
Thank you,
Ken Aszmann
Operations Captain
KDA/lb
CC: Dale Runke, City Planner
PROTECTIVE INSPECTIONS MONTHLY REPORT -
NUMBER OF PERMITS ISSUED
Electrical
Plumbing
HVAC
JANUARY 1988
THIS MONTH YEAR-TO-DATE
81 81
42
42
Water Softener
Signs
Well, Cesspool, Septic Tank
YTD
61
61
3
3
6
6
0
0
NATURE OF BUILDING PERMITS ISSUED
MONTHLY
ia(
,. •,
=lU. Yt1LUK11U11 rr mmi r -LL WLAN Mr;V FEE
TOTAL FEES
FOUNDATION
27
SINGLE FAMILY i
27.$ 2,805,000 $ 15,646.00 $ 7;823.00
$ 73,364.00
DUPLEX
TOWNHOUSE
CONDO
APT BLDGS
AGRICULTURAL
i i
COMMERCIAL
3
ICOMM/IND REMODEL
3 35,200
358.'00 i 162.00 537.85
COMIC/IND ADDITION
INDUSTRIAL -
i
(.INSTITUTIONAL
1
PUBLIC FACILITIES
RES. GARAGES
'
_ I
RES. ADDITIONS
1, 17,000
162.00 1 a1.00 251.50
SWIM POOL
7
MISCELLANEOUS
7 92,500
726.00 I' 227.00 988.50
DEMOLISH
HOUSE MOVES
1
38
MO. TOTALS
38
$ 2,949,700
16,892.00 8,293.00 . 75,141.85
ADJUSTMENTS
38
YEAR-TO—DATE
38
$ 2,949,700
$ 16,892.00 $ 8,293.00 ($
75,141.85_
ia(
PROTECTIVE INSPECTIONS - MONTHLY REPORT
DATE
January 1988
MULTI -FAMILY BREAKDOWN
TYPE
MO.
i# OF
PERMITS
MO. # OF
BUILDINGS
YTD # OF
BUILDINGS
MO t YTD.
# OF # OF
UNITS ( (Tf�FIT S
#OF #OF
PERMITS 13NITS
VOIDED MOVED IN
DUP1.FX
3-P1.FX
NO ACTIVITY
4-PLEX
5-PLEX
6-PLEX
7-PLEX
8-PLEX
10-PLEX
1 6-PLEX
APT. BLDG.
OTHER
TOTAL:
996T xuvnNvr
modal' =IKON - ONOILOadSNI SAIIDSIOUd
,
14569
14568
14556
1-41 tri
tx1 t-4
R S
H
4141
3470 WASHINGTON DRIVE
L1, Bl, BICENTENNIAL 6
3815 NICOLS RD.
L2, B25, SECT. 19
2600 EAGAN WOODS DR
Ll, B1, EAGAN WOODS OFC
ADDRESS & LEGAL
FEDERAL LAND
'BRAD RAGAN
TRAMMELL CROW
PK
- .
.
0
0
14,700
H
.
0
0
VA6ATION
•-•
0
0
H
4,
cs
0
o
$ 178.00
IV
tri
IT,
M 14
H
.
-
H
0
4.,4
4..),
I STATE
'SURCHARGE
1
0
o
0
trl
.4
Ul
0
0
ND
<T
L.)
Lri
-73—*
0 •
Z
z
$ 276.50 kMM IMP
00
2
.
-
______
[OMM IMP
996T xuvnNvr
modal' =IKON - ONOILOadSNI SAIIDSIOUd
PROTECTIVE INSPECTIONS MONTHLY REPORT - JANUARY 1987
NUMBER OF PERMITS ISSUED
Electrical
Plumbing
HVAC
THIS MONTH YEAR-TO-DATE
158 158
115 115
121
121
Water Softener
Signs
Well, Cesspool, Septic Tank
YTD
4
4
9
9
1
1
NATURE -OF BUILDING PERMITS ISSUED
MONTHLY
TYPE
NO.
VALUATION
PERMIT FEE
PLAN REV FEE
TOTAL 1"ELS
1
FOUNDATION
1
$
$
15.00
$
$
15.00
36
SINGLE FAMILY
36
2,988,000
15.,885.50
7,942.75
86,595.25
2
DUPLEX
2
124,000
741.00
370.50
4,577.50
22
TOWNHOUSE -
22
1,390,000
8,242.00
4,121.00
50,502.00
0
CONDO
0
0
APT BLDGS
0
0
_I:GRICULT_URAL
COMMERCIAL
3
750,000
3,803.75
1,874.25 .20,094.00
COMM/IND REMODEL
5
52,660
495.70
142.50
665.70
1
COMM/IND ADDITION
1
5,000
58.50
--
61.00
INDUSTRIAL
0
0
INSTITUTIONAL
0
0
PUBLIC FACILITIES
0
1
RES. GARAGES
1
10,000
93,50
98.50
RES. ADDITIONS
3
51,400
434.50
213 .25
677.75
0
SWIM POOL
0.
MISCELLANEOUS
5
45,660
432.90
456.40
0
DEMOLISH
0
0
HOUSE MOVES
0
ADJUSTMENTS
- 5,000
-- 15.00
- 7.50
- 25.00
79
TOTATS
79
5,411,720
30,187.35
14,660.75
163,718.10
It (1
PROTECTIVE INSPECTIONS - MONTHLY REPORT
DATE
JANUARY 1987
MULTI -FAMILY BREAKDOWN
TYPE
MO.
# OF
PERMITS
MO. # OF
BUILDINGS
YTD # OF
BUILDINGS
MO.
# OF
UNITS
YTD.
# OF
UNITS
# OF
PERMITS
VOIDED
# OF
UNITS
MOVED IN
I
DUPLEX
2
1
1
2
2
0
0
3-PLEg
i 4-PLEX 16
4
4
16
16
0
0
5-PLEX
6 -PLEB 1 6
1
1
6
6 0
0
7-PLEX
•
8-PLEX
10 -PLEB
_
t
12-PLEX
16-PLEX
APT. BLDG.I
i
OTHER
I
TOTAL: 24
6
6
24 24 0
0 1
r .
f-,
N
13149
r
W
I-'
I-`
W
0
0
13087
r
W
0
Ln
-+
.
,.,_
un
.+
.
,r
.+
•
N)
u
! K -,W
..,O
I
H
3227 TERMINAL DR
L 041, B 1, SIB TERM IND
DR PI 17�1 LIIFF CEDAR CLIFF COMP
2121 CLIFF DR
L 1, B 1, CEDAR CLIFF COM
1380 DUCKWOOD DR PK
L 1, B 1, EAGAN CONV CTR
3259 TERMINAL DR
L 061, B 1, SIB TERM IND
1284 TOWN CENTRE DR
L 2, B 1, TOWN CTR 70 2ND
2600 LONE OAK PT
L 1. B 1. LONE OAK 2ND
2000 RAHNCLIFF CT
L 1, B 1, RAHNCLIFF 1ST
1984-96 RAHNCLIFF CT
L 1, B 1, RAHNCLIFF 1ST
C7
Ci]
L7
R.
r
tll
0
r
SAFETY-KLEEN CORI'
FEDERAL LAND
FEDERAL LAND
1
H
z
r
H
Z
HENNING & ROHDE
FEDERAL LAND CO
z
0
M
H
til
UJ
H
a
H
t"'
H
z
Q PETROLEUM
Q PETROLEUM CORP
OWNER
Li,
0
O
O
N
r
O
O
0
r
N
O
--I
to
r
O
O
0
0
0o
O
w
Ln
r
lr
In
0
U)
000`LTZ
OOO'G{S
PERMITPLAN REV
VALUATION _1 FEE I FEES
-...
-
kn
Co
U1
O
r
�1
0
U1
0
r
r
�
cri
0
93.50
CO
Cr
Ln
0
- LJ
0
�1
0
r
In
0
0
894.50
$ 2,894.25
0o
N
V1
ten
N
VI "
427.25
r
0
0
CT
I-,
O
0
266.25
178.25
98.50
r
O
0
W
r
t.
0
r
t_n
0
0
1 3,Q00.25
r
J
0
J
00
v
t.n
1 TOTAL FEES'.
0
o
y
(7)Ll."'
0
0
o
r
Fv
0
0
-
•
'0
1 I
0
o
r
Z
ro
COMM IMP
0
z
r-
z
0
COMM NEW
0
O
z
COMM NEW
OCCUP,
H
rH
H
0
H
0
rd
ts]
SALL31IOHa
L436 XHVfl NVr
DAIKLOTA U1: '11Y
.)R OTA COUNTY
HOUSING &
REDEVELOPMENT
AUTHORITY
2496 - 145th STREET WEST
ROSEMOUNT, MINNESOTA 55068
612-423-4800
Serving People and Communities
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
DATE:
MEMORANDUM
-HRA Commissioners; Dakota County Commissioners; City
Managers; Tom Novak, County Administrator; and Dakota
County Planning Department
Mark S. Ulfers, Executive Director
STATUS REPORT FOR ASSISTED HOUSING AND COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT
February 4, 1988 -.,
Enclosed is the January Status Report for all Assisted Housing
Programs and Community Development Programs currently being
operated in your community and a summary sheet for Dakota County.
If you would like to also receive reports on other Dakota County
'communities, please call Lori Zierden of our staff.
Enclosures
"AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY FMPLOYER"
ASSISTED HOUSING
Status Report for Dakota County**
January, 1988
Amount
of
Elderly Family Total (+/-)*
Section 8 Existing:
Certificates 390 1,164 1,554 +7
Vouchers 37 166 203 0
Moderate Rehab 4 21 25 0
Section 8 New Construction 247 300- 547 0
Low Rent Housing 380 182 5.62 0
235 Home 0 41 41 0
236 Rental 0 526 526 0
TOTAL ASSISTED HOUSING 1,058 2,400 3,458 +7
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
Amount
Commercial/ of
Elderly Family_ Multifamily Total Increase
MHFA Local Participation 0 2 0 2 1
MHFA Home Improvement Loan 33 157 0 190 2
MHFA Home Rehab Loan 63 76 0 139 0
MHFA Home Energy Loan 10 105 0 115 8
Rental Rehab 38 49 5 92 0
CDBG Rehab Loan 87 159 0 246 0
CDBG Rehab Loan - Mobile Home 1 20 0 21 0
MHFA Solar Bank Energy Loan 0 8 0 8 0
312 Loan - Residential 4 15 0 19 0
312 Loan - Commercial/
Mixed Use N/A N/A 3 3 0
Weatherization 339 1,372 0 1,711 9
-TOTAL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 575 1,956 8 2,539 20
* + = Increase/- = Decrease
**
Numbers for the City of South St. Paul are included in
Assisted Housing, Rental Rehab, and Weatherization, but are
excluded from the rest of the Community Development programs;
South St. Paul operates separate Community Development
programs.
-Status Report for the City of Eagan
January, 1988
Amount
of
ASSISTED HOUSING Elderly Family Total (+/-)*
Section -\.8 Existing:
Certificates 41 232 .273 +3
Vouchers 20 60 80 +1
Section 8 New Construction 0 33 .33 0
Low Rent Housing 0 17 17 0
236 Rental- 0 144 144 0
TOTAL ASSISTED HOUSING 61 486 547-.. +4
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
Amount
of
Elderly Family Total Increase
MHFA Home Improvement Loan 2 11 13 1
MHFA Home Rehab Loan 3 3 6 0
MHFA Home Energy Loan 1 7 8 0
CDBG Rehab Loan 1 4 5 0
Weatherization 5 64 69 1
* + _
TOTAL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 12
Increase/- = Decrease
89 101
2
A regular meeting of the Eagan City Council was held on Tuesday,
February 16, 1988 at 6:30 p.m. at the Eagan Municipal Center.
Present were Mayor Vic .41:1.s914,C.ouncilmembers Wachter, Egan,
Gustafson and McCrea. Also01..0000 City Administrator Tom
Hedges, Public Works Director Tom. o1bet, City Planner Dale Runkle,
Consulting Engineer Robert Rosene'i and City Attorney Paul Hauge.
Wachter moved, - McCrea seconded the motion to approve the agenda
as presented. All voted yes.
Regular Meeting of Februat'y Egan moved, McCrea
seconded the motion to approve he minutes of the regular meetingof
February 2, 1988 with the fo'l..;..1owing*Oges: On page 6, referring
to Pam McCrea, should be chanc04:ACShe'; on page 7 in relation to
Statement of Qualifications:01' voted yes except Egan who voted
no; on page 12, the .6..1klist amounts should be as follows:
Checklist dated 2-2-88 in the amount of $148,886.55, and checklist
dated 2-1-88 in the amount of $389,792.75. _All voted aye.
Special Meeting of February 9, 1988. Wachter moved, Gustafson
seconded the motion to appr...0:k rrinuts of the special meeting of
the City Council on FebruaWW14g 4D. voted yea.
..:'..::::.
. •:.:•:.•
....:...:
DALLASZD DEVELOPMENT ND ADOOIONPUBLIC WORKS DEPT.
.-. ..x.:.: ••••••
Public Works Director Tom Colbert reviewed with the City Council
a request for waiver of financial guarantee for Dallas Development
2nd Addition. He indicated that the Council had approved the final
plat in 1987 and approved the final contract on October 20, 1987.
The construction of streets and utilits progressed immediately as
requested by the developer, and signM.cant construction has beep
completed. The developer is still unable to provide the financial
security required by ordOki:OW4'd. mr. Colbert reviewed two
options, including waiver guaranty, and allowing the
1
Council Minutes
-February 16, 1988
release of the final plat fo.....p:04or revoking the final plat
and authorizing the pre:0*Mkrligi:Aacquisition of necessary
easements for the public iMpOvements. iMi.-Colbert recommended the
former and stated that it 'Ould be eaer- to prove benefit against
platted property than unAatted prop.Wy, noting it is not likely
that the property will be0y41e„.. ta)5A&feited in light of the
investment that the developer1ia:n the land.
Bernie Frye appeared on_ behalf of Dallas Development and
mentioned that Tessaract has changed, its position concerning
•construction of the school and now may purchase the land and
construct the building the property is Silver
City Limited Partnership whUilOWAW4ost of the same principals
as Dallas Development Company The eason for the inability to
acquire the guaranty is partially"i.elate:eto the school, according
to Mr. Frye.
•••••••••••••••:.:•:•:•:::
Councilmember McCrea ask bow :.:Aliproblem could be avoided in
"....••.
the future and Mr. Colbert tated thione answer would be to refuse
to allow the award of contracts until the plat is recorded. McCrea
favored approving the plat as the best of two choices and moved,
with Gustafson seconding the motion, to approve the waiver of the
financial guaranty and allow -the release of the final plat for
Dallas Development 2nd Addio.n, with the understanding that the
financial guaranty will be thmtted as soon as possible; further,
it was understood that the c66rof tion appeared to be the best
option based upon the reasons a1eseiTh'6Wj4Y.the'Public Works Director
and that the procedure wou10 not.....beollowed in the future. All
members voted in favor.
SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING - FEBRUARY 25, 1988
City Administrator Tom Hedges recommended that the City Council
add to its February 25th agenda a report from Decision Resources as _
recommended by the Advisory Committee. Egan
moved, Gustafson seconded th'elitbt16..x,:cacknowledge the inclusion on
the agenda of the report from Decision R.eources. All voted aye.
-CLIFF ROAD & BLACKHAWK R&D - OOK & RIDE FACILITY
--A-request had been-Mado'by the'City staff to MnDOT regarding the
proposed installation of a pay telephone receptacle for the
convenienCe-: of, upersv.,,,,at7.:the_Cliff and Blackhawk Roads Park & Ride
facility. MnDOT agreed to pay the kpitallation cost of, about
$1,200.00 and Northwestern 'Bell would 40quire a fee of $55.00 t9
$60..00 for monthly_maintehaRcMr,.:C6lbert asked whether the City
Council would approve thell**..0000the maintenance cost and
Councilman Wachter suggeste:i'dgagof Minnesota be required to
pay. the operational cost. The issuewas continued until further ---
•••••
information is acquired regarding 'alterb*e financing methods.'
2
`C0000il Minutes
February 16, 1988
=
The follVwioEyconaeut[e presented by the staff
and it was recommended that pprove them:
I. Personnel Items:
a. Police Officers. It was recommended that Stephanie
Masczko and James McDonald be hired as Police Officers in the City,
effective March 1, 1988odrespectively.
°' '. ^`
•
b. Community Service onmmeodatioo was made
that the Council approve y Service Officer for
the City Police Department, ua recommended for hire by
the Chief of Police andCity Administrator, subject
to successful compIetioo physical and psychological
examination requirements, With tbe'``ffective beginning work dates
of March 1, 1988 and March 2, 1988.
2. Volunteers of America Week - Proclamation. It was
recommended that the proclamation for Volunteers of America Week
covering March 6 - 13, 198
3. Plumbers Licenses. applications for plumbers
licenses was presented,water conditioner installer
license, according to the pack0 0.a.Wbruary 16, 1988. It was
recommended that-theappli ved.
4. Off -Sale Beer - BnlAdy Station License. An application was
1submitted by the owner of the Holiday Station at 4945 Nicols Road
for off -sale beer license and the recommendation was made that the
Council approve the application.
5. Williams & LaRue 20RA44WftWFinal Plat. An application
was submitted for final of Williams & LaRue 2nd
Addition located' at"'thehorthet co.rier of Wescott Road and
Lexington Avenue. Mr. Colbert rWewedZthe plat and noted
ted it
was -
revised slightly from the 6rali'y t approved on May 19, 1987
due to fdrthec aeSlgo ooboIdecati,fo be upgrading of Lexington
Avenue, resulting in the required aocIu~^` tioo of the existing house
located on proposed Lot 2. In addition, a frontage road across from
Outlot A would be provided to the two northerly lots.
Firemen's Relief Association -?::aritab1e'Gambliog License.
An application had been submitteCby the Firemen's 'Relief
Association to'`olIow-fiveur' „Jcale�dacyear� I388
for charitable -gambling po beib-� tob~'edon-'it
�e
rcommeoded``^tbnt—the-; -
'e be gambling license
application for five one -day �
events.
—�•'' zs` `.� 'n�r •
3
Council Minutes
February 16, 1988
7.. National, Primary Dx4.9Mswati. Regulations (NPDWR). The
Staff submitted a propoW..i5.6i-*M&Iccording to a letter dated
February 4, 1988 addressed&O the Surfa$:eWater Treatment Drinking
Water of the Environment4:'. ProtectiobAgency in Washington D.C.
There was discussion inci1member response and
the staff recommended approV...
8. Northview Road On-StrEking Resolution. A resolution
was submitted. regarding Municipal. tate Aid restricting on -street
parking along -the north side of Northview Park Road from Lexington
Square to Elrene Road as constructed under Contract #88-3. The
staff recommended the the.
Upon motion by Wachter, secobOd 0..0, it was resolved that the
foregoing Consent Agenda itemd:'as P:6sented and recommended be
approved and ordered to be impleTOted.'411 voted affirmatively.
BLACKHAWK POINT - EASEMENT VACATION
The public hearing regarding the vacation of a partial right-of-
way and utility easement on Blackhawk Point was convened by Mayor
Vic Ellison. The Public Works Director described the vacation,
indicating -a portion of the existing public right-of-way for
Blackhawk Point and also eiI:SOstorm sewer easement southeasterly
of Blackhawk Hills Road. Thei:6:WO:RObjections to the proposed
vacation of the easements, aid n61i6e,was sent to the affected
utility companies. Gustafsompve.0400rea seconded the motion to
close the public -hearing -and a*Otbe vacation of the public
right-of-way and utility e011-0:btS and authorize the execution of
the related documents. All voted yes.
BIETER VS -CITY OF EAGAN
At about 7:10 p.m., :::....'11qon asked that the City ,
Administea-tdi introdude-theraW:dsi-deratitn of the proposed
settlement of the Bieter vs. Ea.g.an lawsuit regarding the proposed
Diffley Center project. Mr. Hedgk0: incgOted that an action began
in the spring of 1987 and ! that the Qity Council at the special
meeting on February 9, 1988 efft:erta00 a proposal of the Bieter
Company representatives to potentially 'resolve the lawsuit. 1,,lAn
executive session was held by the City Council that evening and
negotiations have continued during the course of the following week
between attorneys and City staff persons and Bieter representatives
to work toward a compromise solution.
City Attorney Paul Hauge ...explaindit that the Bieter Company
representatives were not 1:$00iC4COCurrent meeting on February
16, and also described the '6id0.1bii46Ah9 open meeting law that
permits a governing body, incldding x„k City Council, to act in
executive session to discuss pending Wthreatened litigation. He
4
Council Minutes
-February 16, 1988
noted that the Eagan City qp;!MOTan:00from time to time, used the
executive session method 4WWW*Iiipsible under Minnesota law.
There are certain requirements, howeverht are imposed including
keeping a record of the ':1DO:deedings of'the executive session. Mr.
Hedges briefly reviewed t*revised 04n proposedby the developer
including the rezoning of tfiCy,g,0.001f of the property to CSC
PD with the easterly half bei:h4a00406ided Commercial and R-4 with
zoning remaining Agricultural.
There were a large number-- of interested persons in the audience
•and Mayor Ellison asked if there were questions from any members of
the audience.
Martin Colon of Federal Land Company appeared and stated that he
appreciated that consideration of'the pediposal is put off and it is
important that the public be giv00“npug..i:
Arlene Krecklau, a resip•Wia0017hat the City intends to do
with the Bieter parcel, 'and' whether a specific study would take
place as to its utilization. Mr. Hedges answered that the Council
has directed staff to arrange for a commercial use study and that it
will be proceeding, perhaps being completed within two to three
months. As to' the Bieter property, he stated the owner has a right
to submit an application, (fte:rwise it will continue to retain the
current comp guide and zoniiig.,
..„...........
._.
•••••:•:•:•:::::::i:::•.....
Ms. Krecklau recommended .t4t .6-.%:/dTillittee be formed, including
councilmembers, developers, itize.rig:nd business persons, to
consider uses of businessPt- throughout the City and
..:•.•:•:•: :•-• • r
,...."....."
recommended that there be 00::::0111:promise in the lawsuit by the City
........,-
Council. ......- -
, .--
Another resident appeared and stated that she was concerned that
the 0 -'Neil case would be a precedent in future cases and Mr. Hauge
stated that there. are _ generally differences from one case to
another-, but that it could'::01::.040At there- are precedents that
arise in the event ofacti,:..:ouncil in any case.
-. .
Councilman Egan cited substantial daOrences between the O'Neil
and Bieter- settings and ,..suggeed that settlements should be
incurred where they are--appropriat.
Member McCrea stated it was her opinion that Arlene Krecklau's
proposal was viable and suggested the staff study the creation of a
committee to review commercial and other uses in the City. She
noted the Economic Development CommissOfj and Developers Task Force
were still in existence.
5
Council Minutes
February 16, 1983
Bill Duggan asked about...":.::= iWOfto select the firm to study
the commercial needs and M*A:.6.tj Waceibed the objective, noting
that most developers do studies befoe:Oiubmitting applications.
Demographic data would-be Lie,c1 by the firm hired by the City.
Mayor Ellison: mentioned..f.6W..11„:::'.:,*aerstood that it would take
nearly three months to comp166;WWM:7
Councilman Egan stated the, study should cover how one.part of
the City would affect other sections of the City. Mr. Egan also
asked about the options that were available to the City Council
regarding the Bieter propery::::WC:44y:Aorney Paul Hauge responded
that there were several op-tRhnrafftWthe following:
J. The applicant could be required to submit a new application
for comp guide revision and r•A'AningAbat would follow the normal
public hearing process.
.:,:•••••••••••••
2. To consider settlement Of thelawsuit, allow the revision to
the zoning by agreement and detailed. Findings and Order, which may
be less defensible. In this case, the question arises as to whether
a majority or two-thirds vote of the City Council would be required
for approval.
Mayor Ellison stated that the event that a proposal for
settlement -is submitted for rezonitg the Bieter action,
at any time in the future, thait sl:kiO4be scheduled for a public
meeting. The consideration en0d,..W060t 7:40 p.m.
•
ORGANIATIONAL APPOINTMENTS
Tom Hedges introduced the proposed appointment of members to
various commissions within the City and noted that appointments were
scheduled to_be made for_theEgnomK Development Commission, Solid
Waste Abatement Commissi000Wi Management Organization.
Notices had been sent to th."1:i5e.61iiiapers. He recommended that
three-year terms be applicabgk for the Economic Development
• •• ••
Commission and Water Managentent 0*Taniz n, due to their on-going
status, but that the Solid Waste AilliAteme Commission was created as
an adhoc study Commission to review sgjd waste abatement and when
the findings and recommendation are completed, the Commission may
not be cOntinued.
Mr. Hedges then described in more • detail the purpose of each
Commission and the proposed ballotilW system, noting the intent
would be that the terms be staggered. W
...........•.••••••••••••••••
....................
..........
6
Council Minutes
:February 16, 1988
1.. EconomicrDevelopmenOPM.±.s.s.ian::;::%.,The following persons were
elected:
Three Year Terms:
Retail Sector::,.
Industrial Sec0..4
Service Sector
Two Year Terms:
Corporate
Financial
Utility Sector
One Year Terms:
Development
Media Sector
Public Sector
1 •,,
Michelle Sewald
George Traynor
William Duggan
Larry Wenzel
Corey Cleveland
Eldon Johnson
Tom Ellingson
Candace Garry
Roger Hughes
It was noted in each case the foregoing persons received a clear
majority of the -Council votes for that position.
2. Solid Waste Abaterde:0:Kgpkwission. No specific terms were
scheduled. Mr. Hedges tl)at the law requires that the
ballots be initialed and that a11ots for public record.
Ballot No. 1 was used for all Ole r.ggpOepositions and Ballot No. 2
for the alternate Thcs were as follows:
Three Residerembers: Tim Hoel
Cindy Ista
Brenda Marshall
Two Business Members:
Two Refuse
Service Organizatiomr
Delmar DeBilzan
Earl Milbridge
Larry Knutson
Kevin Nordby
Tom Mann
Alternate: Terry Schnell
-City Government Service: Jon Hohenstein
3. Water Management Organization. KThere was discussion as to
whether Scott Merkley, who is a member ori another commission, should
be elected to the Water M440*WOOnization, noting the policy
that resident members be ap*ith4d:A.billy one City Commission.
Staff recommended that Mr. Merkley b.,:.:.: reappointed for continuity
7
Council Minutes
February 16, 1988
purposes. Member McCrea stjWAha..t::::Ayas her belief that the one
commission membership po1WWW1 0 upheld. The balloting
resulted in the following Catherine JOpunk and Tom Walkington as
regular members and Scott FP6:tkley as alt'e:tn'ate.
THOMAS LAKE POI i SIGNAGE
The application of the Dominium' Group representing the Thomas
Lake Pointe development for variance to the City's policy to provide
additional off-site signage was upon motion by McCrea, seconded by
Gustafson, continued until •A:11..r,qh.:.:988 regular City Council
•• • • • • •• • • • • ••••••
meeting at the request .. All members voted in
favor.
REMICK ADDITION,..7,P441TPLAT EXTENSION
An application was received fdiii* the developer of the Remick
Addition for an extension of the preliminary plat and Dale Runkle
briefly explained the proposal to the Council. He noted that there
were some technical difficulties in trading of land by the City to
the Remicks and thus the reason for the request for continuance.
Joe Christensen, attorney,*.peared fOr the Remicks. Wachter moved,
.*M:::.staff.
Gustafson seconded the moti6to 177:7the extension for one year,
basedupon the recommendation 6:i
All members voted
affirmatively.
LeMAY LAKE APAgTIWTS - FINAL RESOLUTION
.••••
An application was submitted by the developer of the LeMay Lake
Apartments for refunding of the multi -family housing revenue bond
issue. The Council at its February 2, 1988 meeting, scheduled
consideration for the February 16, 1988 regular meeting, and Mr.
Hedges explained that lowW..i4000Wes is the prime reason for
the request for the refundlibthAQA:of Miller & Schroeder was
present, as was Peter Ramme on betplf Af the developer. Mr. Maple
noted that an annual fee will be *llected by the City on the
refunding as is the current policy. The'..e were no objections by any
persons present.
After brief discussion, Egan moved, Gustafson seconded the
motion to approve the final resolution for the LeMay Lake Apartment
multi -family housing revenue refund bond issue in the amount of
$12,500,000 and to direct the Mayor and City Clerk to execute all
related documents. All councilmembers ifted yes.
r15t:n thc L) C\'
8
._Council Minutes
February 16, 1988
TAX FORFE:L7k11:: :: ; SSIFICATION
Director of Finance. QiOverbeke ii: c3 been notified by Dakota
County that a list of .-parc: j,s in the Ci.t.y of Eagan was requested to
be determined whether to beesignated;::;:; non -conversation lands in
preparation of a tax forfeit:U0:::;:;.;sa1.:;:;:;:::' Real estate taxes have been
delinquent on the parcel sin:iu:i?::39 .or 1983, depending on the type
of property. The Public Works Diirector and Director of Parks & Rec.
had reviewed them and recommended that the City not acquire ••• any of
the eight parcels that were -listed on the Certificate of County
Board of Classification of Forfeited Lands. -The recommendation of
the staff was explained by 1r:M15 40d Egan moved,,Gustafson
seconded the motion to approve of conservation' Clasification
of the parcels described and to:::,direct :the office to notify Dakota
County of the Council's decision.,,.,. A11 v,pted yes.
DALLAS DEVELOPMEN ''':2 :p• ADD ON - SPECIAL PERMIT
An application of Dallas Development Co. for special permit for
two temporary advertising signs on Lots 2 and 3, Block 1, Dallas
Development 2nd_Addition, adjacent to Highway #13 was submitted for
consideration. Mr__. Hedges„ introduced the application and Dale
Runkle explained the pr4000,, noting Dallas Development Company
will not allow Naegele Outc1.6bi4lping to install the pylon sign
approved in_,November of 1987_ by; €he C:11y. Council.
Bernie Frye was present off::,...Jtej4W:of- the applicant and stated
that it was expected that the•::;::;iss:> would be required for only about
six = months. Wachter mov;'e3;:r::'M'c'Crea seconded the motion to rescind
the action of the action approving the Naegele permit. All members
voted in favor.
Egan moved, Gustafson seconded the motion to approve the
application with a two year .1.11 X.imum..c.overing Lot 2, 'Block 1 with the
following conditions.
1. The one time sign fee of ;2;.50 pe;r square foot shall be paid
prior to installation. , ,
2. The sign shall not exceed the posed height of 10 feet.
3, The sign shall be located 10 feet with in the. property•
line.
4. All other" applicable ordinances shall apply.
All voted yea.
V
McCrea moved, Gustafsori:: '.fir:*'i'n ei : ::the motion to approve the
application with a two year riaxiirium 'covering Lot 3, Block 1, with
the following -conditions:
9
Council Minutes
-February 16, 1988
1. The one time sign f.0.:...WW.Sid'r square foot shall be paid
prior to installation.
2. The sign shall not 1g7d. the,Arosed height of 10 feet.
3. The sign shall be 1064W1,MOt within the property line.
4. All other applicable ordinances shall apply.
All voted yes.
NORTHWESTERN BELL TELEPHONE C.Oivii*NY - SPECIAL PERMIT
An application of NorthwedXern 41.1 Telephone Company for
special permit for the exp4pAgtipf,..:.:,:.:Omote terminal buildings at
1585 Diffley Road and 15:04ifiaWwas brought to the Council.
City Planner Dale Runkle reviewed tiipplication for both sites and
it was noted theintentwas to keep the building away from County
Road #30 for purposes of future widening, including slope -easements.
A representative was pre -gent and answered questions of City Council.
She noted that the proposal for each was identical to the project on
the Cedar Grove Baptist sit that was installed previously. The
existing buildings will 66:::.:r':60NT:ed...within about two years. Member
McCrea statdd.she was disappoirY'e4aWthe landscaping around the
buildings and the representate e'i0f0i.rled that Northwestern Bell
will submit proposals for 1anscapng ahd will abide by the staff's
recommendation.
Wachter moved, Egan ..:seconded the [nation to approve the
.applications subject -to theollowing:
1. The buildings shallhave brick exteriors similar to the
previously constructed buildings.
2. Landscape plans mItted and approved by City
staff.
3.- All .other applicable ordiOhceshall be complied with;
...,
..:.:
4. The owner shall grant necessary slope easements as requested
by the City or County for road improvement purposes adjacent to the
parcels.
All voted positively.
10
Council Minutes
'February 16, 1988
WELL #10 - CONTRApT4:8..:11.ouRs OF OPERATION
A request had beef;;; made t rough Orr-Schelen-Mayeron &
Associates, Inc. engineer's'' on behal' '� of E. H. Renner & Sons for
permission .tooper''
ate 24 hoOs a day whx:1;e test pumping Well #10.
Mr. Colbert explained the r'ei u:eqt axa ;;:recommended approval, noting
that the . continuous pumping we w0::`•} e:;:;`fi r four days starting February
17, 1988. Notice had been seii't tb''"a11 neighbors and there were no
objections. Bob Frigaard appeared o:n'behalf of Orr-Schelen-Mayeron
and indicated the purpose was to try to simulate how a permanent
pump would operate. He also indicated that in the event there were
any complaints, the operatid.,.b.e....,ah.ut down. It was expected
the 24 hour pumping would.:; be •..: tyres ; r hts. Egan moved, McCrea
seconded the motion to approthe rrequest, subject to review if
there are complaints received. ATT vote''yes.
COMMUNITY OF Joy -clip: . :'- R :f IUIl G & PRELIMINARY PLAT
An application of Community of Joy Church for rezoning from R-4
to PF (Public Facilities), .:preliminary plat approval and planned
development amendment of Lexington South PD was brought to the City
Council. Mr. Hedges indicated that the hearing was held before the
Advisory Planning CommisOQ•r... on January 26, 1988 and it was
recommended that the applicaa : .3 4Cie approved.
Dale Runkle explained thathe 6':'t'8•` acre parcel is now zoned R-4
within Lexington South Planned Dev.e:ietptnt, it is located east'of
Lexington Avenue-, south of .*14r: tfew' Park Road and was previously
platted as an outlot in the::::; exthg'ton Parkview Addition in 1987. At
that. time a single access pofnt to the area was provided, and no
direct access is currently provided to Lexington Avenue, or proposed
with the current application. •,....44% of the site will be proposed
green area or left as existing undisturbed area. .The current plan
provides for 4,808 square feet with three phases with a maximum
building size of 17,690. 51.::::;tcx g q;a:a:1ls had been provided.
Mr. Runkle -stated that there xn :y be:.:.:pne access in the future to
Lexington Avenue, but not at the presenime.
R 4
A representative of the chui'1h bi iding committee was present
and ,noted that the applicant will.compI•y with the sedimentcontrol
plan and he had no objections to the conditions. He also indicated
there were no plans for access to.. Lexington Avenue at the present
time.
There were no objections. Egan MOed, Gustafson seconded the
motion to approve the application for comp guide amendment from D -IV
to Public Facilities. All :iii:
11
Council Minutes
::February 16, 1988
Wachter moved, QuGt fbe motion to approve the
applicationfor rezoning andan amendment to the
planned development, anoocdUg to the oa~- All voted yes.
-
Egan moved, McCrea motion to approve the
application for the pr el appcovaI, subject to the
following conditions:
``»`;+`..
l. This development shall apCept its additional assessment
.obligations as defined _in the staff's report in accordance with the
final plat dimensions and the rates in effect at the time of final
plat approval.
cx
2. This development shall dedUatS foot drainage and utility
easements centered over all oummdri^'lot iIboa and adjacent to private
property or public right-of-way.
3. �bio develo�m�otr I�covide, or financially
guarantee its pcopoctiooate abace"bt the acquisition costs of
additional drainage, ponding, and utility easements as required by
the alignment, depth, and storage capacity of all required public
utilities and streets located. beyond the boundaries of this plat or
outside of dediCated public right-of-way as necessary to service
this development.
•
'-
4. This development shall -%A0'0... all public right-of-way -and
temporary olope easementsdevelopment of adjacent
roadways as required by theriadiotiuoal agency.
,
5. A detailed `Jcndiog e, erosion, and sediment control
plan must be prepared in ad:edrdauoe with current City standards and
approved by staff prior to final plat approval.
'
S. A detailed .landscape plan shall be submitted on the proposed
grading plan and approved- by staff prior to the final plat approval.
Contract and not releaa6Vyear after the date of
installation. -
7. All A.utezn=l public " ateeeta shall -be constructed
within the ` 'required right-of-wa9'' in ::.0oordaooe with City design
standards.
'. .
.
8. This development shall beresponsiblefor-the acquisition of
all regulator. agency—permits in the time frame required by the
affected agency.
9._ This development.„ll itsparks dedication
ceguicemeuto-'as' recommend:- Advisory Parks and Recreation
.Commission and approved by b6un: a
` Council Minutes
-February 16, 1983
10. All standard uiog conditions shall be
adhered to unless GDeoifica[iaoce by Council action.
^.
��•
•••••••,1
�
11. The landscaping e. revised to provide for
appropriate screening on Me northOPy portion of the parcel,
adjacent to the mgcicuItoca
12. All signage shall be i6q6V6d and approved by City staff.
13. Fifty 10 foot wide parking stalls shall be constructed with
the first phase.
l4�' All trash shall vvitbi� the building or an
��
enclosure shall be nonatcoote0he building with the same
building materials.
15. The proposed
grad -
entrance shall provide a
maximum of 2% for a diota et to 100 feet adjacent to
public right-of-way.
All voted affirmatively.
BEAU D'RUE PRELIMINARY PLAT
`•�
The application of - uy for approval of -the
preliminary plat for Beau �
�.. tiou consisting of 4 lots
on 4.54 Community Shopping _ ou � pp og Ce_including two existing
buildings along Beau D'Rue then considered by the City
Council. The APC ce appcoval,�aub'-eot to certain
conditions. Dale Rona'- noted that the preliminary plat
appIioatiuo was approved in 1983 but had expired and the staff
recommended reapplication for review by the City. In addition, the
staff requested an overall concept plan for future development and
the applicant submitted a suggested master plan. Mike Gair appeared
on behalf of the a� .li � theapplicant �
. � e a�� cout had no
objections to the 11 `ia&�.i``'`� mmeuded by the Planning
Commission. ~
` Coouoilmau u asked a6o t 1988
���` A��� concerns regarding
bufferiuq the single family lots t:8: the utb and Mr. Gair mentioned
that some landscaping would be revised -but it will not include the
driveway along the south property line as was provided earlier. In
1987, there were four proposals for access points, whereas the 1988
plan provides for only two accesses. Also the intensity of the
development would be less under the t plan. The proposal of
the staff was that the City coI the development of th
Outlot in the future, and it ly.p no.tecl ehere was no objections. �
Egan moved, Wachter motion to approve the
application, subject to the followingconditions :
. •::::::.:.
�:::.:.
::::.:
13
Council Minutes
February 16, 1988
1. This development :,..,:i.).li. acraelst its additional assessment
obligations as defined aa. , . 4aWport in accordance with the
final plat dimensions and th "r'ates .in e fact at the time of final
plat approval.- .2 .........-
2. This development -sha 3. dedica.tp .0 foot drainage and utility
easements centered over all cbThttton 1Qt. lines and adjacent to private
property or public right -of -war
3. This development .shall fulfill its parks dedication
.requirements as recommended by the Advisory Parks and Recreation
Commission and approved by au;n A....acti,o.ri.
4. All standard platting andoning,conditions shall be adhered
to unless specifically granted a 'varianc'e:::by Council action.
5. All building expans,thn
parking lots, landscapihs;
requirements at that time.
n .ew zdielopment shall require new
development as per City
6. If a parking problem occurs on Lots 1 or 2, the City may
require that the parking area be expanded on the rear side of those
buildings.
7. Variances shall be 1 wed
setbacks as tshown on the site p1i4h...
8. No exterior trash cbntaip.e:,
D'Rue -Drive.
for the building and parking
shall be visible from Beau
9. The development is•.''responsible for executing a recordable
document between the developer and the City of Eagan ensuring that
in the event the City feels that.. the existing nonconforming parking
area creates a hazard to the traveling public and a maintenance
problem, the development will relocate the parking area to a
conforming use within" 12 maths the wtteri notti6ri fr6m the
City of Eagan.
10. Shared driveway easemets sh'a11 be provided with the
outlot. '
11. Necessary right-of-way for NI:6.81s Road shall be dedicated
with the; plat
All voted affirmatively.
14
Council Minutes
:February 16r I988
TOWN -CENTRE 100PB8LIMI0ARY PLAT
The application of Watfordship for_ preliminary plat
approval of the, Town C ��ditiouoogiotiog of 120
apartment units on Outlot BOIlown CentW100 was.brought to the
Council. The applicant reb1400AeOP the Council consider the
item -later inthe agenda, d
a, u 1Vn by McCrea, seconded Egan,
it was resolved that the appli'atibe continued until later in the
meeting. All -members voted yes.
`PD8LIC�&��S
```�.,."~^---
1. Lone Oak 2nd87-7. Upon recommendation
of the staff and uponmotion' oecooded Gustafson, it was
resolved that the Council tb and final payment under
Contract �87 7 LoneO � 2
o - , � F. Jedlicki, Inc. in the
amount of $4,261.22 and 0 inupcVVen\eut for perpetual
maintenance. All voted yes.
2. Pump & Pumphouse No. 10 - Cliff Road Site - Contract #88-4.
The plans for_ Contract #88-4 have been submitted and it was
ceommmeuded that they be approved and that the Council authorize the
advertisement for bidst
30 a.m. on Friday, March
II, 1988 at the City HallMcCrea seconded the motion
to approve -and implement commendation. All members
notedyea. '
3 .Nancy Cirble - �o-o
cc U. Upon recommendation of the
City staff and upon ,motWitiY Egan, seconded Gustafson, it was
resolved that theCouncil 4Piove the second and final payment for
/Contract #87-10 covering Nancy Circle -to Bituminous �
Boadwayo, Ioo.
'io the amount of $I'817.17 aod^ uooept the improvements for regular
maintenance. All members voted`mye.
4^ Wescott Road - Cnn e recommendation was made
by the Consulting EogiDeec f that the.Council approve
the tenth and final payment for C cac6-I3 consisting of street
and utility improvements' c WeWott RWI. Upon motion by McCrea,-
seconded Wachter, It was reisole.0 thatthatithe Council approve and
direct the:implementation of re `:
mendatioo withpayment to
Northdale Construction-, Inc. in the amb^i t of $3O,201.55 andaccept
theimpcovemeuto for perpetual maioteoaooe as recommended. All
councilmembers voted in favor.
_ 5. Nicols Road - Contract #87-16 aoge Order No. Wachter
_moved, Egan seconded themotion to Wove Change Order NO. 1 to
Contract #87-16 north YVio thocize the Mayor and City
Clerk to execute the ueoea All voted positively.
15
Council Minutes
February 16, 1988
6. Braddock Trail - - Change Order No. 1.
Change order No. 1 was40.0.1#08gWirecommended to be approved.
Upon motion by Gustafson, eonded Wachf*,- it was resolved that
Change Order No. 1 for ''contract #87'.1-2*5 consisting of street
improvements on Braddock ai1 be Approved in the amount of
$4,973.70 and that the Cleend Ma be authorized to sign the
required documents. All votea44::::Y
MAGNUM TOWING - CONDITIONAL USE
Kevin Mellon of Magnum pp):wOg,,a;t4.E.01 Biscayne Avenue appeared
concerning the conditionalZOCO*0:iWOr the auto impound facility
at the southeast corner of the CiOfi(Oequested that the staff
review a proposed extension to 'efie pe:thit granted in December of
1985. He indicated that the Cittstaffilas not had time to process
the extension covering Lot 3.,:,,1A*aley First Addition. He
mentioned that there had bn with neighbors. Egan
moved, Wachter seconded the motioiC to allow Magnum Towing to
continue as an impound facility until the March 16, 1988 meeting, at
which time the City Council will take official action concerning the
permit, if it is necessary to do so, with the understanding that
notice will be sent to the neighbors concerning the proposed
extension of the permit. 11 members voted in favor.
Mr. Mellon also indicated'ttiWhad a contract with the City
to impound City cars for a per0d otiaiie.4 but that later the Police
Department rescinded the co0:*actAWAsked if he could rebid the
City towing and storage, Which040ifitly being done by Richfield
Towing and storage at Lehm0AMiii Highway #13. The Administrator
was asked to review thxdOnditional use permit for the Lehman's
property and also the request of Mr. Mellon.
POLICE CAPTAIN'S 1980 COMPENSATION RATE
The City Administrattkr. .f.that -in reviewing total
compensation received during 17, it had been discovered that
compensation received by Sergeantn-t6§Police Department, and by
captains are extremely close ir some cases According to the
concept of comparable worth, th1g. shoUU not be true. A memo from
Administrative Assistant _Holly Duffy'aated February 8, 1988
reviewing the issue was discussed. MemberMcCrea asked -why 101
differential was recommended and Mr, Hedges' answer was that the 10%
factor has been used for supervisors salary above other personnel in
the past by the City. Wachter moved, McCrea seconded the:motion to
approve the compensation rate for Policaptains at 10% over the
estimated total compensation ..crate forolice _Sergeants, with the
understanding that the o1:d0044ffM0 the top Police Sergeant's
salary shall be no greater .5.A.i&ii!..45f compensation time per
year. All councilmembers voted in favor,x
:::::•:.:
16
. Council Minutes
-February 16, 1988
E
The City &dVliuistcatbcalao renie^' ' with the City Council a
proposal from Finance DiGene VanOverbeke by memo
dated February 12, 1988 revceot status of the election
equipment. Tbe.ecIuipmeut p[ eeo the Mark Sense Optech
III -P system which allows for tfiti of paper ballots in individual
precinct counting. The reason for. 'the request was that,the new
.system could handle the problem of cross-over voting in primary
.elections and provide more timely results. It was also explained
that most of the cities wb d ace- withdrawing from-the
�T
Joint Powers Election Eoi-precommendation aud the ceoowos
made that the City Council oe���61z*��'naider the purchase of the
equipment described in the noemn.���Mc.dgea mentioned that the
Council would most likely be* tb the proposal within the
next three years, in any� cdec to have the equipment
available in 1988 primary
i���vvouId be necessary to order
it soon. Staff was cecIueaee�''�to ce�'` the potential for leasing
the equipment and -return to the CitCouncil with a proposal.
- CLIFF ROAD UPGRADING - PROJECT #510
City Public Works Dire80.014,..,Colbert explained to the Council
that the staff and councilmemiceived a telephone call from
a resident in the Johnny 0.ake -iaa49, Addition objecting to the
proposed median to be construcbd.f.Withe existing intersection
of Ridgecliffe Drive, just eas4.P..31bEnny Cake Ridge Road. There
were no objections expre0Wa'E the public hearing on January 5,
1988. The City Council ti:ga- expressed some sensitivity to the
concerns restricting this City street intersection. The County has
agreed to revise the plans to provide full access movement in the
intersection, but other residents have requested a solid median
through the intersection remain, which is opposed by the Public
Works Department. The r0.:TM:01W14Y' the Public Works Director
was that full access be prc*::146A1*.ecliffe Drive to provide
emergency vehicle access and -ftikk acq:p.ps to Cliff Road. Mayor
Ellison favored full access. 4gan lOed, Gustafson seconded the
motion to accept the recommqndati'66 of 0! staff to provide for full
access as proposed. There were n6" obj0iitions, and all voted in
favor.
17
Council Minutes
February 16, 1988
TOWN CENTRE 100 :..PP;T:IPPtPRELIMINARY PLAT
The application of Wa0ord PartWahip for preliminary plat
approval of Town Centre ;O0 5th Additlbn was then returned to the
City Council for its review. The APC rOipmmended approval subject
to certain conditions p1 R1-111.0ie was asked to detail the
application andhe explaine4A68. 6 acre parcel on the south
side of Town Centre Drive, &iflr of Lexington Avenue would
include 122 rental units with_five 22'unit buildings and one12 -unit
building. One parcel exceeded. the 20% lot coverage but on average,
the coverage is under 20%. The density would be 13.9 units per
acre.
Mike Bloch of James Hill & A,$oc Obeared, as did Jack Brandt,
one of the owners. Mr. Bloch1-scusa the runoff to the rear of
theproject and indicated the rat has :Opreased somewhat because of
increased impervious surfac.eanCaated the developer would
agree with a joint storm Oipk:400, with the property owner to
the south. He further .atated .Homeowners Association will be
established and Mentioned that there is capacity available and a
maintenance agreement is important for purposes of access to
utilities to Town Centre:Drive. In addition, a trailway connection
would be provided along the west -of the property.
Jack Brandt noted that.:...:ront exterior would be constructed
of brick, and that there woulcr'45e4040.nance free lap siding around
the other side.
- -
Mayor Ellison asked if thWO6It':°''could be extended around all
four sides, and Mr. BrandtiWAOer was that it would be too costly
to do so. He further exp1fi'd that the units would be 1,400 square
feet in size, all would have fireplace, vaulted 'ceilings, and
washers and dryers in each- unit. The rent would be -as high as
$800.00 per month, and there would be central heating and air
conditioning. Upon question, he answered that family and
professional couples would M1Matfor tenant purposes.
Councilman Egan asked whetherWie parcel is part of the parcel
designated R-4 that could revert W usa.0*:iand the answer was yes.
Mayor Ellison stated- the staff isOviewing quality indicators
for apartment projects to avoid fading (31*.the exterior, and asked if
the developer would entertain suggestions..forsiding, other than
maintenance free lap. Mr. Brandt indicated that he would work with
the staff in that respect.
Egan moved, Wachter -seconded tL. motion to approve t4,
application, subject to the following cdMitions:
18
, Council Minutes
,:_February 16, 1988
l".
This developmentimpp. its additional assessment
Obligations as defined iu�A��—withOct in accordance the
rates plat dimensions and io feot at tbe time of final
plat approval.
?���~
•
2. This development Sh4OidicgOA.0 foot drainage and utility
easements centered over alllines and adjacent to private
propectl, or public right-of-wm
3. This development shall dedicate -all public right-of-way and
temporary slope easements for ultimate development of adjacent
roadways as required by tb riodiotiwual agency.
4. A detailed grading, '—aimu, and aadimeot^ ooutcl
plan,plan,must be prepared in aococde wiourcent City standards and
approved by staff prior to val .
•
5^ A detailed landscapesubmitted on the proposed
grading plan and approved 6f staff Pefbr to the final plat approval.
The financial guarantee shall be included in_Development
�tb� �
Contract and 'not released .until One -year after the date of
installation.
0.All internal publidind private streets shall be constructed
within the required rigb in accordance with City design
standards. .
` ^
=
7. If any public improvemOits be installed under a City
contract, the appropriateapproved by Council action
prior to final plat aD|cov ''
..„:::•::::""
8. This development shall be responsible for the acquisition of
all regulatory agency permits in the time frame required by the
affected agency.
9. This, developmenOW411 its parks dedication
requirements as recommenctedb4g&iisory Parks and Recreation
Commission and approved by Councili
10. All standard l Ia:ttiho ud *ming conditions shall be
adhered to unless specifically gc^` ted aciauoe by Council aCtioo.
11. All trash shall be contained in the garages ' or the
enclosures shall be noted on the final plat submission.
The development obaIl
landing area as appzov
,Ariveo to Town Centre Drive
.� _ ~
b . regOred to provide maximum 2%
t on the proposed eutcaoc0
19
...:•:':•:
Council Minutes
February 16, 1988
14. The development sh41:1:::.gbwed to work with the Eagan
Parks and Recreation DepargaiViM.tOitUning the best location for
the storm sewer outlet tiiifiugh O'LeariOark which provides a storm
sewer for Lots 3-6. - -
15. The development, V:gpgh .0W execution of the property
building owners associatioi00.t. can accept the maintenance
and ownership responsibilities df:E.'he proposed internal sanitary
sewer system. This agreement would eliminate the need to construct
sanitary manholes in Town Centre Drive.
16. There shall be
Lexington Avenue.
the property directly to
17. A 20 foot easement sh1 bdxt)rovided along the westerly
portion of the property for the 0.0-itarpewer.'
18. Developer shall ..ii10..iilWct400Y with staff to provide for
siding of as long lasting-n'atuto as:0Y6sible..
Mr. Gustafson explained concerns about the storage of wood for
fireplaces and Mr. Colbert suggested that gas fireplaces be
installed as an alternate. All Councilmembers voted in favor. -
1979 DDD ASPEN
Mr. Hedges requested appro01 .9,..46 City Council to declare a
1979 Dodge Aspen as surplus anand sale of the vehicle. Upon
motion by Wachter:, secon4Wtikt'rea, itwasresolved that the high
bid of Ken Aszmann in the.:::Mount of $255.D0 for the Dodge -be
approved and be declared surplus property. All voted yes,..
AIRPORT RELATIONS COMMITTEE
The City Administrator : fASAC meeting was being held
on February 16, 1988 and that tuW.n Mqprick, MASAC representative,
was unable to be present, as s Jol*Hohenstein, He also noted
that there as no alternate a:nd thW the. Council may consider an
- alternate for that position.
NORWEST BANK DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE
Tom Hedges explained to the CouncW that he was requested by
Norwest Bank to serve on a community 10.rd relating to development
within the City. /He was concerped not only about his schedule, but
also any potential claim of The Councilmembers suggested
that for both reasons, it wni.6.4a0isable that he be a member
of the Board.
Council Minutes
-February 16, 1988
SOLID WOW. HO4tift4OMMISSION
The Administrator then*ted that!„.lene Bahr had requested she
be reappointed to the 'Lid Was Abatement Commission and
recommended she be addedln adc4gpnal member because it is an
ADHOC Committee and that it fiik4g0iinue in existence for a very
long period of time. Gustafsor.64C McCrea seconded the motion to
appoint Darlene Bahr to the Committee. All members voted yea.
LEAGUE OF CIMMMKTIVE SEMINAR
Mayor Ellison stated that fw and several staff members were
present at the League of Cities't6gislave Seminar on February 16,
1988 and briefly reported on se of the discussion, including
property tax issues propop.0...Abe 6nsidered during the 1988
Legislative Session.
O'NEIL VS. CITY' OF EAGAN
City Attorney Paul Hauge explained to the City Council that the
two proposed agreements :,e9.:arding the three actions involving the
O'Neil property had not beeii0U:r:ped to him by the O'Neil attorneys
and that they were not ready 'ed.44ision to the City Council :for
its review and approval. -Henot..6a01.at the draft agreements had
last been sent to the O'N0110&ey on January 21, and that
several reply -comments had.j50W0Siiitted to the condemnation
agreement within the pastiO0Wwith certain concerns regarding
revisions to the City Attorney's draft. He requested direction from
the Council as to whether ..the public hearing should be held at the
February 25, 1988 Planning Commission meeting to rezone the
property. It was the consensus of the Council that the public
hearing be continued until the next regular meeting. in March because
the Council has not hal.017M to review and approve the
agreements.
' CHE#LIST.
••••••••
Upon motion by Wachter, secondecr'Gustafson, the -following
checklists dated January 31-, 1988 in the amount of $924,266.18, the
list dated February_15, 1988 in the ampunt_of-$288,860.25, and also
the checklist -dated February 16, in amount of $452,524.41
be approved. Allvoted in favor.
)1:7;
21
Council Minutes
February 16, 1988
City Clerk
22