04/05/1988 - City Council RegularREGUTAR MEETING
imam CL'I'P CX7[]NCLL
EAGAN, MINNESOTA
MAICIPAL CENTER BUILDING
APRIL 5, 1988
6:30 P.M.
I. 6:30 - ROIL CALL & PLEDGE OF ALIBMANCE (BLUE)
II. 6:35 - ADOPT MEND& & APPROVAL OF MINUTES (BLUE)
III. 6:45 - DEPARTMENT' HEAD BUSINESS (BLUE)
A. DIRECIOR OF PUBLIC WORKS
1. Burkhardt Plumbing - Outstanding Invoice
P / $. PARKS & RECREATION DEPAR.EMENT
5 1. RFP for Architectural Services/Community Center Project
`1,,,.\-( 2. Thomas lake Shelter Building
IV. 6:55 - ccusawr ACS (ORCHID)
`c\ A. PERSONNEL ITEMS
°a°
B. PLIES LICENSES
O C. RESOLUTION, Direct MWCC to Retain SAC Charges
e.. S D. AUTHORIZATION, To Increase Mileage Rate for Use of Personal Autos
1 P.2' E. CERTIFICATION, Survey Correction for Beautiful Savior 1st Addition
P
'6 . STREET NAME CHANGE from C msery Drive to Yankee Drive
..
APPOINTMENT, Assistant Weed Inspector
g �9 H. PRQTECT 452, Receive Report/Order Public Hearing (Pond AP -50 Outlet)
e. 30I. PROJECT 534, Receive Report/Order Public Hearing (Blackhawk Ponds -
P._ Sanitary Sewer Lift Station
r� PJ. PROTECT 535, Authorize Feasibility Report (Carlson Lake Lift Station
1 1 Improvements)
f� 3' K. FINAL PIAT, Dodd Farm Addition
( , 33L. COUNTY TRAFFIC SIGNAL AGREEMENT, Piot Knob Road Improvement
r ,33M. PROTECT 536, Receive Petition/Order Feasibility Report (South Oaks -
Streets and Utilities)
110.N. FINAL PLAT, Blackhawk Glen 3rd Addition
1 ,3g O. FINAL PLAT, Stoney Point Addition
t�,0 P. EXTENSION, Final. Plat Approval, Dallas Development 2nd Addition
.4k Q. Bomb Squad Agreement with St. Paul Police Department
rV. 7:00 - PUBLIC HEARING (SALMON)
�p 4� A. mama',mama',522, Ridgeview Acres (Streetlights)
1, B. VACATION of Partial Right -of -Way, Blackhawk Hills Road and Federal
Drive)
�C. VACATION of Partial Right -of -Way, Safari Pass
VI. OID BUSINESS (PINK)
AGREEIS, independent School District #196/City of Eagan, Joint
` Pbwers and Field Utilization
B. DEFINITION, Eagan/Mendota Heights Aircraft Corridor
tQ C. REVIEW & QDNSIDER, Proposed Settlement of Bieter vs City of Eagan
lawsuit Regarding Proposed Diffley Center Project
kID\D. REQUEST (Blue Bell Ice Cream) to Operate on Public Streets Within the
City of Eagan i .
C.
X.
XL.
NEW S NE SS (TAN)
REQUEST (Penguin Ice Cream, Inc) to Operate on Public Streets Within
the City of Eagan
COMPREHENSIVE GUIDE PLAN AMENDMENT, T, Mentor Development Corporation,
Thomas Lake Woods, PLANNED DEVELOPMENT ANA (REZONING) from R -4
(Multiple), PF (Public Facilities) and R -3 (Townhouse) to R -3
(Townhouse) and /4-1 (Single - Family) and a PRELIMINARY PLAT Consisting
of 60 townhouse Units and 27 Single - Family Lots on 39.3 Acres with
the Blackhawk Park PD, Located W of Thomas Lake Road and S of NSP
Easement
PRELIMINARY PLAT, Federal Land Company, Town Centre 70 9th Addition,
Consisting of 4.3 Acres Including one (.81) Acre Lot for a Pizza But
Restaurant
CJONDITIC*NAL USE PERMIT, Pylon Sign E of May 35E and W of Town Centre
Drive
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT, Federal Land Company, to Allow a 35' Tall
Pylon Sign for Tbwn Centre Shopping Center, Outlot B. of Town Centre
70 1st Addition W of Town Centre Road Along Highway 35E
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT, Dan Bar Company, to Allow On -Site Residence
for Mini - Storage Facility, Lot 6, Block 2, Sibley Terminal Industrial
Park W of Hwy 13
WAIVER OF PLAT, Calvary Memorial Church, to Split Lot 2, Block 1,
Sunset 10th Addition for a Conveyance of Land Located S of County
Road 30
PRELIMINARY PLAT, Don & Mary Olson, Olson Addition, Consisting of
1.05 Acres of R -1 Zoned Land within Eagan Hills West PD for Two
Single Family Lots, Located Along E Side of Rahn Road N of Shale Lane
REZONING, Burnsville Lumber, Whispering Woods 4th Addition, of 5.7 A
(Agricultural) Acres to R -1 (Single - Family) Containing 14 Lots
PRELIMINARY PLAT, of 27.7 Acres for 57 Lots Including Above 5.7 Acres
VARIANCE, for Front Yard Setbacks/West of Slater Road
ORDINANCE AST, to Section 13.30, Subdivision 1 and 2 of City's
Code Chapter 13, Subdivision Regulations
ADDITIONAL ITEM (GOLD)
PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT CONTRACTS
CONTRACT 88 -11, Approve Plans /Authorize Advertisement for Bids
(Woodlands Addition & Hurley Lake - Storm Sewer Lift Stations)
VEHICLE #144, Receive Bids /Award Contract (Public Works Front End
Loader)
PUBLIC WJCIRKS MAINTENANCE E FACILITY, Award Contract
CONTRACT 88 -19, Approve Plans & Specifications/ Authorize Ad for
Bids, Well #5 - Pump Repair
CONTRACT 87 -11, Approve Change Order #2, Greensboro 2nd Addition
CONTRACT 87 -17, Approve Change Order #1, Blackhawk Road
CONTRACT 87 -36, Approve Change Order #1, Whispering Woods 2nd
Addition
CONTRACT 87 -24, Approve Change Order #3, Northview Park Road
CONTRACT 86 -E, Final Acceptance - LeMay Lake Hills Utility and Street
Improvements
GRADING PERMIT EX -29 -068, Cliff Lake Center
AGENDA (GREEN)
VISITORS TO BE HEARD (for those persons not on agenda)
ADICURNMENT
MEMO TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCILMEMBERS
FROM: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES
DATE: MARCH 29, 1988
SUBJECT: AGENDA INFORMATION FOR APRIL 5, 1988
CITY COUNCIL MEETING
After approval is given to the April 5, 1988 agenda and regular
City Council meeting minutes for the March 15, 1988 meeting and
special meeting minutes for February 25, March 9 and March 24,
the following items are in order for consideration.
A. DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS:
ADOPT' AGENDA APPROVE MINUTES
DEPARTMENT HEAD BUSINESS
BURKHARDT PLUMBING - OUTSTANDING INVOICE
1. Burkhardt Plumbing- Outstanding Invoice - -On October 30, 1986,
the City Utility Maintenance Division of the Public Works
Department incurred overtime expense at the request of Burkhardt
Plumbing to provide inspections for the installation of sewer and
water services at 3865 and 3867 Windcrest Court. In accordance
with City policy, they were informed that this after hour
inspection would result in additional fees which they agreed to
prior to the work being performed by the City.
Subsequently, on November 4, 1986, an invoice for $28.26 was
forwarded to Burkhardt Plumbing Inc. for payment. After no
response, a second invoice was sent on January 29, 1987. Again,
after no response, the Utility Superintendent personally
contacted Burkhardt Plumbing on September 15th and November 17th
of 1987 requesting payment of this outstanding invoice. Still,
there was no response to the City contacts. On January 15th, the
Public Works Director personally contacted Mr. Burkhardt
requesting reimbursement. At that time, Mr. Burkhardt indicated
no knowledge of the outstanding invoice and requested information
from the City before processing payment.
On January 20th, a letter was forwarded to Mr. Burkhardt's
attention explaining the circumstances and requesting the item be
properly resolved within two weeks to eliminate any need for
further formal action.
Again, with no response by Burkhardt Plumbing, the Public Works
Director personally Mr. Burkhardt on March 23rd at which time Mr.
Burkhardt indicated that he had never received any invoice from
the City and would not forward payment without further
information. Enclosed on pages is a registered letter that
has been sent to Mr. Burkhardt's att ntion regarding this issue.
Agenda Information Memo
April 5, 1988, City Council Meeting
DEPARTMENT HEAD BUSINESS CONT'D.
It appears that the staff has exhausted all avenues available to
try and resolve this issue. Therefore, it is being brought to
the City Council's attention for consideration of formal action
to insure payment to the City prior to any plumbing license
renewal or further permit issuances.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To authorize the
appropriate action necessary to insure collection of the 18 month
outstanding invoice for Burkhardt Plumbing Inc.
city of eagan
3830 PILOT KNOB ROAD, P.O. BOX 21199
EAGAN, MINNESOTA 55121
PHONE: (612) 454 -8100
MARCH 24, 1988
HAROLD BURKHARDT PLUMBING
501 - 132ND AVE N.E.
BLAINE MN 55434
Dear Mr. Burkhardt:
REGISTERED MAIL
RE: Sewer and Water Inspection - 3865 and 3867 Windcrest Court, Eagan, Mn
As I discussed with you on the telephone on March 23rd, the City has to take
seriously your reluctance to reimburse the City for expenses incurred in
responding to your Company's request that we perform a sewer and water
inspection at the above - referenced address after normal working hours. The
original invoice #2300 was forwarded to your Company's attention on November
4, 1986. A second copy was sent on January 29, 1987. After no response, our
Superintendent of Utilities, Mr. Joe Connolly contacted your Company on
September 15, 1987 and November 17, 1987 to inquire about the status of this
outstanding invoice. On January 15, 1988, I talked with you personally
regarding this outstanding invoice. You indicated you had no knowledge of the
issue and wanted to receive information as to what the billing was for.
Subsequently, on January 20, 1988, Mr. Joe Connolly forwarded the enclosed
letter to your attention again delineating the information and requesting the
issue be resolved within two weeks.
As of March 22nd, the City still had not received any response from you or a
representative of your Company regarding your firm's intention to reimburse
the City of Eagan. On March 23rd, I again personally spoke with you and
indicated that due to lack of response to the several previous contacts, it
appeared appropriate that the issue be brought to the attention of the full
City Council at their meeting on April 5, 1988. This personal contact was not
meant as a threat as you had indicated, but rather as an informative contact
to let you know that the issue would be formally discussed at that time. I
had also indicated that this would not be necessary if you had paid this bill
by March 25th.
THE LONE OAK TREE...THE SYMBOL OF STRENGTH AND GROWTH IN OUR COMMUNITY
VAC ELLISON
Mayor
THOMAS EGAN
DAVID K. GUSTAFSON
PAMELA McCREA
THEODORE WACHTER
Council Members
THOMAS HEDGES
City Administrator
EUGENE VAN OVERBEKE
City Clerk
3
Agenda Information Memo
April 5, 1988, City Council Meeting
PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT
B. PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT:
Item 1. Review Request for Proposal for Architectural Services
for Community Center - -The Parks and Recreation Advisory
Commission met on Saturday, March 26, 1988, to finalize a draft
request for proposal for architectural services for consideration
of the community center project. For additional information on
this item, refer to a memo prepared by the Director of Parks and
Recreation, a copy is enclosed on pages (i through gp
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the
request for proposal for providing architectural services to the
City of Eagan for the community center project.
MEMORANDUM
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
TOM HEDGES, CITY ADMINISTRATOR
pW FROM: KEN VRAA, DIRECTOR OF PARKS AND RECREATION
DATE: MARCH 29, 1988
RE: REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS - COMMUNITY CENTER
BACKGROUND:
City Council accepted the preliminary report prepared by the
Advisory Parks and Recreation Commission on a community center
and directed.that Staff prepare a Request for Proposal for
architectural services at it's March 15th meeting.
COMMISSION REVIEW:
The Advisory Commission, at a special meeting on March 26th, met
for the purpose of reviewing and discussing the draft R.F.P. as
prepared by department staff. The Commission also reviewed and
discussed other aspects of the project including the selection
process for the architect, a critical decision /action plan, and
schedule for services to be provided by the architect.
The Commission is forwarding to the City Council, with a
recommendation of approval to proceed with the solicitation of
proposals including the following:
1. Instruction for submissions.
2. Request for Proposal information.
3. Architectural selection process and time frame.
4. Tentative schedule for architectural services.
COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED:
The Council is asked to approve the draft R.F.P. and tentative
time line. The firms are required to submit by May 2, 4:30 P.M.
for the purposes of screening. Final selection by the City
Council is tentatively set for May 17th.
KV:cm
Attachments
B. Proposals must be in a sealed envelope and clearly marked in
the lower left corner:
CitW0f.,nan, Parks & Recreation
Comm4riT Proposal
C. Proposal shall be r(SiOeiy:ggii:/.1:0:: than Monday, May 2,
1988, 4:30 P.M., at...04::::€11iie they will be opened. Submit
(4) four copies of::15i
::•••••
D. The City will review all proposals and notify all proposers
of the firms to be interviewed for final consideration.
E. Identify firm, adqTess number and contact person
responsible foriA.0:;:;:1#0:§01; and, if appropriate,
information regaratiftflbl41i6.ire by two or more firms.
•
F. Proposal shall not exceeW25 f*Oe pages in length, 8 1/2" x
11" sheets and soft bound.i
G. The firm shall include a s regarding their
approach to the project.
H. Proposal must clearly indicate the project manager and
members of the firm who will ki0“nvolved in the project and
their responsibility for its 0#pletion. The proposal must
contain the qualif persons assigned to the
Project.
I. Should the City be able to peticeed with Phase II of the
project, please indicate x40 will be the staff/firms
involved in the project for mechanical, electrical,
structural engineering, etc. Include qualifications scope.
J. Provide recent examples of work of a similar nature, size
and individuals who may be contacted regarding these
projects as references. The projects should be
representative. :8.:fM/3g;,t ':the firm and Project
Architect /Manage Y assigned if the firm is
awarded the Proj ec ::
K. Submit graphic !fl .i erials ;:(photos, drawings, etc.)
illustrating past e4i eng ::
L. A commitment to begin t work promptly, if selected, and
ability to assign persons named to meet requirements of
work.
Selection Criteria for
of the firm to pride architectural services to the
City shall be based upon the }.11ow.t::
A. Responsiveness of :;ie:e'wri 'proposal to the purpose and
scope of the project.
B. Reputation and qualifications of the firm, project team,
staff and support, and associated firms (if any) to provide
the requested service.
C. Firms approach t� ":. :t i :....pxQJect. Additional selection
criteria pertaining to'''':1:3:0ti5• of the project, management
style, responsiveness to cliex}t:F' public image etc., will be
part of the final sel Ctj:•P i ess.
Terms and Conditions
A. The City of Eagan reserves the right to reject any and all
proposals or to select the one considered the most
advantageous for the City. Selection shall not be on fee
structure alone.
B. If, for any reasori';•••th'e*' * selected is not able to
commence services under:;:;:ts p: `:pposal within 15 days after
its award, the City reserves tki: right to award the contract
to the next most qualific firr[i
C. The City requires affirmative action, and therefore, the
firm selected shall not discriminate under the contract
against any person in accordance with federal, state and
local regulations.
D. The city shall pay the Firm fob:: ::ervices on the basis of the
fixed fee for Phas.•:::;i :;::.and:.: : :creed upon fee for Phase II.
E. If, for any reason, the firm shall fail to fulfill in timely
and proper manner the obligat; c}ns under the contract., the
City shall reserve the right :fis: terminate said contract by
specifying the date of termination in a written notice to
the firm at least thirty (30) calendar days before the
termination date. In this event, the firm shall be entitled
to just and equitable compensation for any satisfactory work
completed.
F. No elected official or employee of the City who exercises
any responsibiliti: s::;.:4: t# C:: v:?;:e', approval or carrying out
of the proposal ?:t: :: :: tiih ::::shall participate in any
decision which 4:tfects his :.Qr her direct or indirect
personal or finan interest
::::: i nterest in this contract and
G. The firm shall not ::as :0,9171 a `:::: prior written
shall not transfer .:7: :tt}�:;;:. terest without the p
consent of the City. •
V
REOUEST FOR PROPOSAL - EAGAN COMMUNITY CENTER
EAGAN, MINNESOTA
Purpose of Request
The City of Eagan, Parks and Recreation Department, is requesting
proposals from architectural firms for planning and design
service relating to a proposed Eagan Community Center. The work
required will consist of two separate phases; Phase I work will
consist of program refinement, site analysis, schematic design
and cost estimating. Phase II will consist of detailed design
work, bid and construction supervision. Phase II will be
contingent on the approval of an anticipated bond referendum
needed to finance the construction of said facility.
Background
The City's Advisory Parks and Recreation Commission has recently
completed a preliminary study on the public desire /need for a
community center. As part of this preliminary study, the
consultant services of Decision Resources, a national survey and
polling firm, conducted a random sample survey of Eagan residents
to help determine interests in a community center. The Advisory
Parks and Recreation Commission has since determined that there
does indeed appear to be sufficient interest and need for a
community center. The Commission has recommended to the City
Council to proceed to the next step in this process with the
hiring of a professional firm to provide additional information
on costs, space needs, site determination, etc. The City Council
has approved the Commission's recommendation and is now
soliciting proposals from architectural firms to conduct the
Phase I work.
The City has identified several possible components for this
community center including: an indoor ice arena, gymnasium,
indoor /outdoor swimming pool, office space, community and craft
rooms, sport rooms and support facilities. A preliminary program
statement has been prepared for each of these components. The
City has not finalized or prioritized the list of components that
will be included in this center. Cost information on each
component, separately or in combination with others, is needed.
It is expected that the architectural firm selected will provide
professional guidance and cost estimating to help the City make a
final determination on the components of the center, a concept
plan and a construction cost estimate.
Construction of any community center facility for the City will
be contingent upon the successful passage of a bond referendum.
The City Council has made no commitment for such a referendum,
and approval to proceed with a referendum will be necessary. The
City expects the facility to cost in excess of $4 M.
Scope of Services - Phase I
Preliminary program statements have been prepared for a number of
potential components of a community center. It is assumed that
the cost for all of these components will exceed the City's
ability to financially support such a facility. The selected
firm will, in conjunction with staff, Advisory Commission, etc.,
refine the program statements in order to prepare schematic
designs and cost estimates. Alternative schematic designs, with
cost estimates, will be required because of the desire to
include /delete selected components of the building.
Under Phase I, the architect will conduct a review of a
previously selected site for the facility. The City currently
owns approximately twenty (20) acres of property south of the
City Municipal Center, a location which was acquired in the late
1970's for a future community center. The general assumption is
that the community center will be constructed here. However,
site planning will be necessary to confirm this decision.
Alternative locations will be explored should the primary site
be determineed to be "infeasible."
The City intends to finance the construction of the facility
through a bond referendum. A referendum has not been scheduled
and Council approval will be required. To provide a basis for
the referendum and to best inform the City voters as to the cost
and considerations within the issue, the following architectural
services will be required:
1. Meet with City staff, officials, and the public to review
the preliminary architectural program statements for further
refinement and definition. Establish a preliminary
architectural program.
2. Review proposed site(s), to determine suitability in terms
of soil, size, utilities, topography, access, relationship
to other known and planned City facilities, etc. Prepare an
overall concept plan of the municipal campus /community
center site.
3. Prepare preliminary and alternative schematic plans for a
community center with cost estimates, make modificiations to
the plans, as may be necessary, for a preferred plan.
Schematic design shall denote facility layout,
relationships, site adaptability, determination of
preliminary building systems, materials and building form.
Provide the City with alternate design approaches and
utilization of Existing Technologies for facility
components. Supply support information which addresses
function, operational costs, aesthetic consideration and
costs for each alternative.
4. Provide a construction cost estimate for the preferred
alternative which shall be used as a basis for a
referendum.
5. Attend necessary meetings with the City Council, Advisory
Parks and Recreation Commission, and the public to address
design and cost factors associated with the project.
LI
6. Provide sufficient support documentation for the City's bond
referendum, including the necessary preliminary cost
estimate breakdowns, drawings, renderings and narrative
which may be necessary to conduct said referendum.
Phase 2
Contingent upon the passage of a successful bond referendum, the
following additional architectural services will be required:
1. Meet with the City staff and officials for further
refinement and confirmation of the architectural program.
2. Prepare detailed plans for approval; consider and prepare
alternative plans as may be necessary.
3. Prepare a pallet of materials, finishes and colors
anticipated to be used in the construction process.
4. Prepare detailed plans, after approval, with construction
documents and specifications for public bid and
construction. The architect shall prepare all forms,
conditions of contract, agreements, etc., necessary for
contracting and construction of the facility.
5. Coordinate the bid opening, bid analysis and recommendation
for award.
6. Manage the contract through all aspects of construction,
including continuous on -site construction inspections,
amenitites, and final inspections.
7. Prepare written documentation of construction progress and
prepare payment requests.
8. Attend all necessary meetings, organize and present
materials as required; represent the City's best interests.
9. Provide services ordinarily associated with projects of this
nature.
Fee Structure
Compensation for all services under Phase 1 will be on a fixed
fee basis of $35,000. Services to be provided under Phase II of
the contract will be based on any standard fee structure as
submitted by the firm and agreed to by the City. Any method of
calculation will be acceptable for consideration provided the
cost for the 2nd Phase is clearly shown.
Payment Schedule
The City shall pay for all services and items provided by the
firm under Phase I in a lump sum upon completion of the Phase or
on such schedule as shall be mutually accepted by the City and
the firm. The City shall pay for all services and items provided
under Phase II on a progress basis as major elements of the Phase
are completed.
ID
Contract Documents
The City reserves the right to select another firm to do Phase II
work if there is dissatisfaction, as determined by the City, with
the performance, quality, responsiveness, etc. of the firm during
Phase 1. The City will not guarantee to the firm Phase II of the
contract.
The RFP and letter of intention, qualified only by any
attachments thereto, shall constitute the contract. Necessary
modifications, descriptions of alternates and service
clarifications may be covered in such documents. Upon a written
request by either party, the City and the firm may negotiate a
separate contract covering the general conditions and price
schedule proposed. Any such contract shall supercede the
proposal only upon its execution; the proposal continuing in
force and effect until that time.
�3
ARCHITECT SELECTION PROCESS
The following is suggested as the Process for Selection of an
architectural firm to do the Phase I Study. This process is very
similar to the process used to select the engineering consultants
for the City.
After approval of the R.F.P., they will be sent to firms that
have previously expressed interest in the project and have
experience in similar types of facilities. Approximately 12
firms, as of this date, are on the list of firms to receive the
R.F.P.
A proposer's meeting is planned to further explain the R.F.P. and
respond to questions. This should allow all of the candidate
firms an equal opportunity to respond.
Staff (composed of the City Administrator, Public Works Director,
Landscape Architect and Director of Parks and Recreation)would
screen the list of firms to 3 to 4 for interviews.
The Interview Committee would make a recommendation to the City
Council; ranking the firms in preference order. The Interview
Committee might be made up of two members of the Council, two
from the Advisory Commission and two City Staff. This
combination was used for the selection of the consultant for the
parks master plan and shelter buildings.
Attached is a proposed time line for the selection process.
Ken Vraa
3/17/88
KV:cm
PROPOSED SCHEDULE
ARCHITECT SELECTION PROCESS
City Council received preliminary study
report. Directs Staff and Commission to
complete R.F.P. for architect.
City Council receives draft of R.F.P.; April 5, 1988
approval to proceed
Pre - Submittal /Proposer's Conference
R.F.P.'s Submittal Deadline
Staff evaluation /Screen
Interviews /Recommendation
City Council Approval
March 3, 1988
April 15, 1988
May 2, 1988
May 3 -8, 1988
May 13, 1988
May 17, 1988
ro �
n
ro
LI H
H
LI
G C
ca
� c
! ro
H 0
0
L
H LI
G1 hi
x H
- z
O
c
H - H
C
C) ro
H
z LI
- -- w
ro
ro
H
LI
0
,O
,^
V.
H
C
0
H
H
0
x
0
0
x
H
0
PEI
LI
H
H
0
0
0
Co
H
cn
PEI
LI
N
0
H
LI
C)
H
- —
r
cn
H r
C 0 )
0 — 0
x x
H
H
LI
C)
H
C
• r -
ro
0
C)
LI
C
0
x ro
Do 0
C)ti
H H
0-3 cn
nH
H C
C
LI
H
0
Agenda Information Memo
April 5, 1988, City Council Meeting
Item 2. Thomas Lake Shelter Building - -The Parks and Recreation
Commission has given final approval to a building plan for the
Thomas Lake Shelter Building. The Director of Parks and
Recreation on behalf of the Commission is requesting approval of
the building plans and authoriz tion to proceed with bidding the
project. Enclosed on page )K is a memo providing summary of
this agenda item. The City Council has previously approved the
architecture for the building.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the
building plan for the Thomas Lake Shelter Building and
authorization to proceed with bidding the project.
MEMORANDUM
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
TOM HEDGES, CITY ADMINISTRATOR
FROM: KEN VRAA, DIRECTOR OF PARKS AND RECREATION
DATE: MARCH 29, 1988
RE: THOMAS LAKE PARK /PARK BUILDINGS
BACKGROUND:
The Advisory Commission and City Council approved the
architectural program statements for Thomas Lake Park in December
and January respectively. At the February Advisory Commission
meeting, a concept plan was reviewed. Approval to prepare
schematic plans with a cost estimate was given. The
architectural firm of Schwarz Weber completed the schematics and
the Advisory Commission reviewed the plans at the March 26
advisory meeting.
DISCUSSION:
It was noted that the Thomas Lake Park building estimate exceeded
the projected budget by some $25,000. Staff presented several
alternatives for dealing with this issue including requesting
deduct alternates, reduction in building size and redesign. The
Advisory Commission, noting that the bid price for the previous
two park building contracts were less than the architect's
estimate, has recommended that approval be given to prepare plans
and specifications and for a bid let based on the schematic
plans. Further, that deduct alternates be requested should the
bid price come in over budget. Further, the commission felt that
a transfer of approximately $10,000 to supplement building
construction program from the park site fund is warranted.
FOR COUNCIL ACTION:
The City Council is requested to review and approve the schematic
plans for the Thomas Lake Park building. To authorize the
preparation of plans and specifications for the project and for
bid opening on May 3, 1988.
Staff will be present at the City Council meeting of April 5th to
review with the Council the schematic plan for the park shelter
building and respond to questions concerning the project.
8
Agenda Information Memo
April 5, 1988, City Council Meeting
There are seventeen (17) items on the agenda referred to as
consent items requiring one (1) motion by the City Council. If
the City Council wishes to discuss any of the items in further
detail, those items should be removed from the Consent Agenda and
placed under Additional Items unless the discussion required is
brief.
A. PERSONNEL ITEMS:
CONSENT AGENDA
PERSONNEL ITEMS
Item 1. Cable Coordinator- -Mike Reardon was selected as the
Cable Administrator to serve the cities of Burnsville and Eagan.
Mike was chosen from a field of 39 candidates of whom eight were
interviewed by a panel consisting of representatives of the City
of Burnsville, the City of Eagan, and the Joint Cable Commission.
Mike brings to the position experience with the Dakota County
Housing and Redevelopment Authority, the Stillwater Main Street
Project and the City of Farmington. In addition, Mike has
experience in local broadcast productions and has been televising
Eagan public meetings for the past two years. Mike has a
bachelor's degree in Public Administration and is certified by
Brown Institute in radio and television broadcasting. Mike
begins his full -time responsibilities on April 4. He will be
officed in Eagan City Hall.
There is no action required on this item; approval was given at
the March 15 meeting.
Item 2. Ratification of Volunteer Fire Department Pension
Change -- During February, direction was given to the City
Administrator to offer the Firefighters Pension Relief
Association a change in their pension from $10.33 per month to
$15.00 per month effective January 1, 1988. Also, a change
occurred in the disability whereby the new rate is $2,250 per
year of service if service is related to disability. If not
service related, $1,125 per year of service is allowed if the
person has at least five years as a volunteer firefighter. At
the last regular meeting of the Eagan Fire Department Relief
Association held in late February, authorization was given to
accept the pension increases presented by the City Council. This
pension rate will be in effect for three years.
The constitution and bylaws have been revised during the month of
March and are now in order for consideration by the City Council.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To authorize final
ratification of the new pension benefits for the Eagan Volunteer
Agenda Information Memo
April 5, 1988, City Council Meeting
Firefighters Relief Association and require that the appropriate
amendments be made to the Eagan Fire Department Relief
Association constitution and bylaws.
Item 3. Planner I - -The City has received a letter of resignation
from Steve Schwanke, one of the Planner I's in the Community
Development Department. Mr. Schwanke is resigning from his
position at the City of Eagan in order to accept a position with
the Metropolitan Council. His last day of employment will be
Friday, April 8, 1988.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To accept the resignation
of Steve Schwanke and to authorize the advertisement for the
vacant Planner I position with the City.
Item 4. Student Intern (Recreation) - -For the Council's
information, Bonnie Blood, an undergraduate student at the
University of Minnesota, Department of Leisure Studies, is
interning with the Department of Parks and Recreation this spring
quarter as a part of her course requirements. Ms. Blood will not
be an employee of the City of Eagan. Therefore, this item is for
the Council's information and no action is required on this item.
B. Plumbers Licenses - -There are nine (9) plumbers licenses in
order for renewal. These licenses meet the regulatory
requirements. The following is a list of those plumbers
licenses:
Eagan Plumbing and Heating
Jim Murr Plumbing
Lakeville Plumbing & Heating
Madsen Plumbing & Heating
Joseph E. Peters Plumbing
PLUMBERS LICENSES
Groth Sewer & Water
J.R. Kelly Plumbing & Heating
Lundgren Brother Plumbing
Murr Plumbing
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the list of
plumbers licenses as presented.
RESOLUTION /MWCC TO RETAIN SAC CHARGES
C. Resolution to Direct MWCC to Retain SAC Charges - -In the late
summer and fall of 1986, there was a great deal of discussion
about the MWCC changing its policy regarding the collection of
SAC fees for properties where sewer service is not available. As
a part of the policy change, the MWCC offered an optional refund
program to communities and /or property owners for amounts
collected during the years 1973 through 1986. The SAC fees would
not have been collected had the new policy been in place.
ao
Agenda Information Memo
April 5, 1988, City Council Meeting
It has been the recommendation of the Director of Finance and
City Administrator that this city not participate in the refund
program for a number of reasons. That recommendation was
forwarded to the City Council as an Additional Information item
for the July 7, 1987 City Council meeting. However, there was
no formal action recorded in the minutes. There was no specific
direction given and therefore the staff has operated under the
premise that the city not become involved in the refund option.
The MWCC is requesting that a resolution be adopted that gives
specific City Council action. Therefore, a copy of the
resolution is enclosed for your review and consideration on
page 0 . Also enclosed is a copy of a memo that was prepared
by the Director of Finance and distributed as a part f the July
7, 1987 City Council packet.(See pages 5 and 0 )
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To authorize a resolution
entitled "Directing the Metropolitan Waste Control Commission to
Retain Previously Collected SAC Charges for Sanitary Sewers Not
Available."
,,R
RESOLUTION
RESOLUTION DIRECTING THE METROPOLITAN WASTE CONTROL
COMMISSION TO RETAIN PREVIOUSLY COLLECTED SAC CHARGES
WHERE SANITARY SEWER IS NOT AVAILABLE
WHEREAS, for the years of 1973 through 1986, the
Metropolitan Waste Control Commission (MWCC) required the City of
Eagan to collect Sewer Availability Charges (SAC) from property
owners where sanitary sewer was not available, and
WHEREAS, the City of Eagan did collect SAC charges for
the parcels in the amounts in effect at the time of collection,
and
WHEREAS, the MWCC has revised its policy and required
each City to adopt a resolution directing the MWCC to either
refund the SAC charges or retain the SAC charges to cover future
connections of those properties to the sanitary sewer system;
NOW, THEREFORE, the City of Eagan hereby resolves that
any and all of the SAC charges paid by Eagan residents for the
affected properties be retained by the MWCC and not be refunded
to either the City or the individual property owners.
Passed and duly adopted by the Council of the City of
Eagan this 5th day of April, 1988.
Motion Made By:
Seconded By:
Those in Favor:
Those Opposed:
CERTIFICATION
I, E. J. VanOverbeke, Clerk of the City of Eagan,
Dakota County, Minnesota, do hereby certify that the foregoing
resolution was duly passed and adopted by the City Council of the
City of Eagan, Dakota County, Minnesota, in a regular meeting
thereof assembled this 5th day of April, 1988.
CITY OF EAGAN
CITY COUNCIL
By:
Its Mayor
Attest:
Its Clerk
E.J.VanOverbeke, City Clerk
City of Eagan
MEMO TO: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES
FROM: FINANCE DIRECTOR /CITY CLERK VANOVERBEKE
DATE: DECEMBER 12, 1986
SUBJECT: METROPOLITAN WASTE CONTROL COMMISSION REFUND OPTION
As you are aware, the MWCC recently changed its policy relative to
the Reserve Capacity Charge for the collection of Service Avail-
ability Charges (SAC). Under the new policy, which is effective
January 1, 1987, SAC will be collected as follows:
* On the basis of the building permits issued for development
which at the time of construction, will have access directly
or indirectly to the Metropolitan Disposal System, and
* On the basis of the connection permits issued for then
existing buildings which will have access directly or indir-
ectly to the Metropolitan Disposal system and who did not
remit SAC at the time the building permit was issued.
This means in effect that at the time of building permit issuance,
SAC will be collected only if sanitary sewer service is available.
This of course reverses the previous MWCC policy of collecting SAC
with every building permit whether or not service is available.
The City of Eagan will begin collecting its Sewer Connection
Charge on the same basis to be consistent and will have no problem
implementing this change.
At the same time, the MWCC approved a SAC refund to communities
for previous SAC payments made where connection was not possible.
It was assumed that the refund would be passed along to the appro-
priate person after being received by the City. The program is
optional on the part of each community and the refund would be at
the same rate that it was collected. A new SAC collection would
then be made at the time of sewer service availability at the rate
then in effect. This refund option is available to the communities
during the period of 1987 through 1989.
I have discussed this matter with Dale Peterson since'the collec-
tion of SAC relates to building permit issuance. It is our
recommendation that the City of Eagan not participate in the
refund program for the following reasons:
1. Most of Eagan has central sewer service available, conse-
quently, there are not very many refund candidates.
2. - It would be very time consuming administratively to find
each candidate to provide documentation to authorize the
refund. (Conversely, it is not difficult to review each
sewer connection application as they are processed.)
3. Refunds would probably have to be made to the current
property owner rather than the person who actually paid the
SAC.
DECEMBER 16, 1986
PAGE TWO
4. Given the consistent rate increases in the SAC, the next
payment (at the time of availability) would be much higher
than the refund amount and generate a certain amount of ill
will especially if the same person who received the refund
has to pay the new higher rate.
I think the refund option may be appropriate in communities where
central sewer service will probably not be available in the
foreseeable future.
I believe it would be appropriate to bring this matter before the
City Council to have them make the determination as to whether or
not Eagan should participate in this refund option. The MWCC has
a 20+ page report detailing the refund option study and I would be
happy to provide any additional information that you or the
Council may desire.
Financ irector /City Clerk
cc: Public Works Director Colbert
Chief Building Official Peterson
EJV /kf
Agenda Information Memo
April 5, 1988, City Council Meeting
AUTHORIZATION TO INCREASE MILEAGE RATE
D. Authorization, To Increase Mileage Rate for Use of Personal
Autos -- During 1985, the City Council authorized an increase in
the reimbursement rate for the use of personal autos from $.20 to
$.25 per mile. Due to the tax complications, the $.25 per mile
became an optional figure selected by certain employees. The
general rate used for all other employees was set at the maximum
allowable IRS rate of $.205 per mile. In the fall of 1987, the
IRS announced that the standard mileage rate for 1987 would be
$.225 per mile. It is recommended that the City Council
authorize an increase to its reimbursement rate to the $.225 per
mile. There is no change recommended for the optional $.25 per
mile rate although that might be of importance to some employees.
The City Administrator receives a car allowance and there has
been no adjustment made since January 1986. It is recommended
that that car allowance be increased by 3% for 1988.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve an increase in
the reimbursement rate to $.225 per mile and to increase the car
allowance to the City Administrator by 3 %.
J
Agenda Information Memo
April 5, 1988, City Council Meeting
CERTIFICATION /SURVEY CORRECTION FOR BEAUTIFUL SAVIOR
E. Certification, Survey Correction for Beautiful Savior 1st
Addition - -The City has received notice from a registered land
surveyor, Mr. Delmer Schwanz, that the Beautiful Savior 1st
Addition plat filed at the Dakota County Recorder's office on
November 19, 1987, did contain an error in that the symbol and
statement defining the width of the drainage and utility
easements dedicated in the plat were omitted. The plat has been
corrected defining the drainage and utility easement shown as
dashed lines in Lot 1, Block 1, are 10' in width adjoining all
street lines and 5' in width adjoining the solid lot line.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the land
surveyor's certificate of correction to the Beautiful Savior 1st
Addition plat.
STREET NAME CHANGE /COMSERV DRIVE TO YANKEE DRIVE
F. Street Name Change from Comsery Drive to Yankee Drive - -MSA
Advance Manufacturing, Inc., the new owner of the Comsery
Building and properties is requesting that Comsery Drive be
renamed to "Yankee Drive." R. L. Johnson Investment Company,
Inc., who owns the only other building on Comsery Drive, is
consenting to the proposed name change to Yankee Drive. The City
has correspondence from the controller for R.L. Johnson
Investment Company, Inc., providing their consent. City
departments have reviewed the name change and are in agreement
with the recommended change by MSA Advance Manufacturing.
However, it is staff's recommendation that approval be
conditioned with MSA Advanced Manufacturing, Inc.'s agreement to
pay for the new signs and the cost of erecting them.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the name change
of Comsery Drive to Yankee Drive subject to MSA Advance
Manufacturing, Inc.'s assuming the costs associated with the
street name change.
Agenda Information Memo
April 5, 1988, City Council Meeting
APPOINTMENT OF ASSISTANT WEED INSPECTOR
G. Appointment of Assistant Weed Inspector -- According to State
statute, all Mayors of City Code cities become the local weed
inspectors for their political subdivision when they are elected
to office. The statute provides for the Mayor to carry out
enforcement of the noxious weed law through an "assistant weed
inspector." Mr. Jim McGuffee, Parks and Recreation Foreman, has
been filling the designated position of Assistant Weed Inspector
since 1978.
It is the recommendation of the Director of Parks and Recreation
and City Administrator that Jim McGuffee be appointed as
Assistant Weed Inspector during Mayor Ellison's office as Mayor.
Our Parks and Recreation Foreman, Jim McGuffee, has prepared a
brief overview of the current weed en rcement program and a copy
is enclosed for your review on page
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To authorize the
appointment of Jim McGuffee to fill the position of Assistant
Weed Inspector and carry out the noxious weed enforcement program
for Mayor Ellison.
WEED ENFORCEMENT OVERVIEW
Most weed complaints received by the City come from new homeowners living next
to an undeveloped lot. They purchase a new home, put in a nice lawn, and soon
weeds from the undeveloped lots spread into their sod. In the spring,
numerous calls are received on problems with dandelions. Similar calls are
received through the balance of the year, ending sometime around mid - October.
Other types of complaints come from citizens who live next to a home up for
sale or a vacant house where the lawn height exceeds the six inches permitted
by City ordinance. In 1987 a total of 187 weed complaints were responded to
by City staff.
When a complaint comes into the office, the Weed Inspector must review the
area in question to be sure there is a violation of the ordinance. When this
has been confirmed, the owner's name and legal description of the property has
to be obtained from records at City Hall. State form AG- 00178 -02 is then
completed stating the owner's name, address, legal description and how to
control or eradicate the weeds in violation. This form can be hand delivered
or mailed to the owner of the property giving the owner ten days to comply
with the notice. 127 such forms were delivered in 1987.
After ten days have elapsed, the property must be reinspected. If the weeds
have not been cut or sprayed, the Weed Inspector completes form AG- 00180 -02,
the Inspector's authorization to destroy the weeds. The City has the option
of hiring a contractor or cutting the weeds using City personnel and
equipment. When the work is completed, a cost statement is made out and sent
to the owner for payment. If the bill does not get paid, it is mailed to the
County and put on the taxes as a lien on the property.
Enforcement of the noxious and nuisance weed laws is becoming a larger
responsibility each year. In response to this growth the City hired a Weed
Inspector Aide in 1987 to work on a part -time (16 hours per week) basis, from
April through October. Implementation of this program greatly aided the
Department of Parks and Recreation in responding to, evaluating, and enforcing
the noxious weed law. As a result, a much better service was afforded the
community through improved response time and follow -up to complaints.
Agenda Information Memo
April 5, 1988, City Council Meeting
PROJ. 452, RECEIVE REPORT /ORDER PUBLIC HEARING (POND AP -50)
H. Project 452, Receive Report /Order Public Hearing (Pond AP-
50 Storm Sewer Outlet) - -There have been several public hearings
held discussing a variety of alternates to provide the storm
sewer outlet for Pond AP -50 located east of Scott Trail and north
of Cliff Road along the common property line of Cedar Cliff
Commercial Park Second Addition and the Federal Land property.
Because no outlet presently exists for this pond, high water
levels and related floodings have occurred several times
resulting in extensive pumping by the City and subsequent claims
submitted by the affected property owners. At the present time,
Federal Land Company has initiated litigation against the City
for encroachments of the ponding area onto their property due to
no outlet being available. Also, the City has received claims
for damages from the Cedar Cliff Commercial Park Second Addition
building (Lawrence Spande et al) for flooding damages due to no
outlet.
Of the various alternates originally proposed, the staff would
like to pursue the alignment through Rahn Park as being the most
economic and efficient alternative. The staff will be meeting
with the Advisory Parks and Recreation Commission on Thursday,
April 7th to review this proposal and will present their concerns
at the public hearing proposed for May 3rd.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To receive the Feasibility
Report for Project 452 (Pond AP -50 Storm Sewer Outlet) and
schedule a public hearing to be held on May 3, 1988.
Agenda Information Memo
April 5, 1988, City Council Meeting
PROJECT 534, RECEIVE REPORT /ORDER PUBLIC HEARING
(BLACKHAWK POND - SANITARY SEWER LIFT STATION & POND RESTORATION)
1. Project 534, Receive Report /Order Public Hearing (Blackhawk
Pond- Sanitary Sewer Lift Station & Pond Restoration) - -On March
15th, the Council received a petition and authorized the
preparation of a Feasibility Report for the installation of a
sanitary sewer lift station to service the proposed Blackhawk
Ponds Addition and authorize the preparation of a Feasibility
Report. This report has now been completed and is being
presented to the Council for consideration of scheduling a formal
public hearing. In addition to the proposed sanitary sewer lift
station, this report also includes the excavation of silt and
sediment and related restoration from Pond BP -29 which is the
designated water quality treatment pond for the trunk storm sewer
system prior to discharge into Blackhawk Lake. With the
development of this subdivision and the installation of this
trunk sanitary sewer lift station, it would be the best economic
and appropriate time to perform this pond restoration work.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To receive the Feasibility
Report for Project 534 (Blackhawk Ponds- Sanitary Lift Station and
Pond Restoration) and schedule a public hearing to be held on May
3, 1988.
PROJECT 535, AUTHORIZE FEASIBILITY REPORT
(CARLSON LAKE STORM SEWER & LIFT STATION UPGRADE)
J. Project 535, Authorize Feasibility Report (Carlson Lake
Storm Sewer & Lift Station Upgrade) - -As a result of the recent
evaluation of the overall community storm sewer system subsequent
to the super storm of July 23, 1987, the staff has completed some
preliminary studies indicating a need to upgrade the storm sewer
lift station for the Carlson Lake outlet as well as some minor
storm sewer improvements within this drainage basin.
Subsequently, staff would like to receive authorization to
prepare a formal Feasibility Report formally discussing the
proposed improvements and methods of financing.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To authorize the
preparation of a Feasibility Report for Project 535 (Carlson
Lake -Storm Sewer & Lift Station Upgrade).
��O
Agenda Information Memo
April 5, 1988, City Council Meeting
APPROVE FINAL PLAT, DODD FARM ADDITION
K. Approve Final Plat, Dodd Farm Addition - -The staff has
received an application for final plat approval for the Dodd Farm
Addition located west of Dodd Road and north of Golden Meadow
Road as shown by the plat enclosed on page 3, . All conditions
stipulated by Council with the preliminary plat approval on
September 15, 1987, have been satisfactorily complied with. All
final plat application materials have been submitted, reviewed by
staff and found to be in order for favorable Council action.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the final plat
for the Dodd Farm Addition and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk
to execute all related documents.
2
W
a
a
0
r --
" ^ I
y — -\
\ `
1 �, / I
• •1
r'
•
7
\ •
•
1
H
r
t sit
a t
1
ell el
r �
/
•
Z
Of 9C
!ii
o •
DO
0•I
11.90.61.0 1�
N
1
•
• •
t,j
CC
•
r
S
0
Agenda Information Memo
April 5, 1988, City Council Meeting
APPROVE TRAFFIC SIGNAL AGREEMENT, PILOT KNOB ROAD IMPROVEMENT
L. Approve Traffic Signal Agreement, Pilot Knob Road
Improvement - -As a part of the upgrading of Pilot Knob Road, it is
proposed to install traffic signals at the intersection of Pilot
Knob Road with Cliff Road, Diffley Road and Duckwood Drive.
Subsequently, the Dakota County Highway Department has prepared a
separate traffic signal agreement (County #88 -3) for the joint
financial and maintenance participation in these signals. This
Agreement has been reviewed by the Public Works Department and
found to be in conformance with similar past signal agreements
within the City.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the traffic
signal agreement with Dakota County (Pilot Knob Road - Project 466)
and authorize the execution by the Mayor and City Clerk.
PROJ. 536 /PETITION /FEASIBILITY REPORT
M. Project 536, Receive Petition /Order Feasibility Report,
(South Oaks - Streets and Utilities) - -The staff has received a
petition from 21 property owners representing 20 lots in the
South Oaks Subdivision requesting the installation of sanitary
sewer, water, street improvements and street lights within the
subdivision. The affected properties of hose petitioners are
referenced by the map enclosed on Page 3
On July 5, 1983, a public hearing was previously held to discuss,
the installation of these same improvements. This public hearing
was continued to July 19, 1983, at which time, the property
owners rejected the proposed improvements. However, there
appears to be a renewed interest in pursuing this issue in light
of recent developments in the vicinity (Manor Lake Addition,
Overhill Farms, etc.)
Therefore, it is recommended that the Council accept this
petition and authorize the updating of the original Feasibility
Report for these proposed improvements and to again discuss these
at another formal public hearing to see if there is sufficient
interest to proceed with this project as requested.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THS ITEM: To receive the Petition and
authorize the preparation of a Feasibility Report for Project
#536, South Oaks Addition (streets and utilities).
'�
.
Agenda Information Memo
April 5, 1988, City Council Meeting
APPROVE FINAL PLAT, BLACKHAWK GLEN 3RD ADDITION
N. Approve Final Plat, Blackhawk Glen 3rd Addition - -The staff
has received an application for final plat approval for the
Blackhawk Glen 3rd Addition located south of Blackhawk Hills
Road, east of the Blackhawk Hills Addition, north of Blackhawk
Lake and west of the proposed Blackhawk Ridge Addition. The
proposed plat is enclosed on pages( -t - z)7. All conditions
stipulated by Council with the preliminary plat approval on
October 20, 1987, have been satisfactorily complied with. All
final plat application materials have been submitted, reviewed by
staff and found to be in order for favorable Council action.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the final plat
for the Blackhawk Glen 3rd Addition and authorize the Mayor and
City Clerk to execute all related documents.
I
ovay Slim
%MYN %3//19 — "� — �•
•
z
t
• • •
I I N
f .
I -
i
1••,••• s'tr ac. •s. )a Sid s N
•.j.I ),sl s,_o I Si J•?. -•-
<;•; ninon 3N171 i NMVH)l ie ■
.�
' r
I I ji j� 'I 1. ° I! P ±i 1, A p i i N i , /
• � y .
I
� n 1
„7: I ` /
•
z
9
i
/
V
I
I
I
•
t S•3•
CI
WI f
rIw try. earl. ••• I •,a sat Han
-- - / woe I ),a AA •r oat
•
•
ri
Z
4/ \
/ `�✓
/ �
P G
Z 3
1
al - f•r•"rsci-w-verr--,
11 . • 1 '
i
Agenda Information Memo
April 5, 1988, City Council Meeting
APPROVE FINAL PLAT, STONEY POINT ADDITION
0. Approve Final Plat, Stoney Point Addition - -The staff has
received an application for final plat approval for the Stoney
Point Addition located east of Blackhawk Glen, north of Blackhawk
Hills Road and west of the I -35E right -of -way. The proposed
Stoney Point Addition plat is as shown on page _3 . All
conditions stipulated by Council with the preliminary plat
approval on August 18, 1987, have been satisfactorily complied
with. All final plat application materials have been submitted,
reviewed by staff and found to be in order for favorable Council
action.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the final plat
for the Stoney Point Addition and authorize the Mayor and City
Clerk to execute all related documents.
3
f
A,
V =
Z
,
c) \a
et._ . "1' ,
1111..
3 •
S i
y ivt
0,,t‘
as
l; — o7 'ON IV "Id .41414 :;:J AWAY w
/ .
re,* a* .rr .wamooke , .. ..r 111.00.... sow* ... ram, "•
3:1;110 ; rxa: L•'d
Agenda Information Memo
April 5, 1988, City Council Meeting
EXTENSION OF FINAL PLAT APPROVAL
DALLAS DEVELOPMENT SECOND ADDITION
P. Extension of Final Plat Approval - Dallas Development Second
Addition - -The Dallas Development Second Addition received their
final plat approval by Council action on November 5, 1987.
According to City Ordinance, this final plat approval is valid
for a period of 60 days to allow them to record their plat at
Dakota County. Due to the Developer's inability to provide the
necessary financial guarantee, the staff would not release the
plat for recording. On January 5, 1988, the City Council granted
a 30 day extension to the final plat approval based on the
Developer's statements that the financial guarantees were
imminent.
On February 16, 1988, the Council waived the financial guarantee
requirement to allow the plat to be recorded due to previous
commitments made by the City which required the recording of the
plat in a prompt manner.
During this same time frame, the Developer experienced problems
in title description discovered by County staff in reviewing the
plat for recording. It appears now that all of these issues and
concerns have been resolved. However, the previous extension of
final plat approval has subsequently expired. Therefore, it is
necessarty to again grant another extension to the original final
plat approval by Council. The staff is recommending that a final
extension be granted until April 30, 1988.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To authorize an extension
of final plat approval for Dallas Development Second Addition
until April 30, 1988.
Agenda Information Memo
April 5, 1988, City Council Meeting
BOMB SOUAD AGREEMENT /ST PAUL POLICE DEPARTMENT
Q. Bomb Squad Agreement /St. Paul Police Department- -Chief of
Police Berthe is recommending that an agreement for services be
entered into with the St. Paul Police Department Bomb Squad to
assist the Eagan Police Department when necessary. Apparently,
only three (3) Police Departments have bomb squads, those being
St. Paul and Minneapolis Police and the Airport Police. For
additional information on this item and for a copy of 1) a memo
from Chief of Police Berthe, 2) a letter from Chief of Police
for the City of St. Paul and, a copy of the bomb squad agreement,
refer to pages L2 through u 7
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the bomb squad
agreement with the St. Paul Police Department as presented. If
there are any questions regarding the agreement, Chief of Police
Berthe will be present through the consent agenda and can
properly discuss the matter at that time.
3830 Pilot Knob Road
Eagan, Minnesota 55122
Phone: (6123_454-3900
March 28, 19 8 8
city of ecigan
police department
JAY M. BERTHE
Chief of Poli
PATRICK J. GEAGAN
Administrative Captain
KENNETH D. ASZMANN
Operations Captain
VIC ELLISON
Mayor
THOMAS EGAN
DAVID K. GUSTAFSON
PAMELA McCREA
THEODORE WACHTER
Council Members
THOMAS HEDGES
City Administrator
EUGENE VAN OVERBEKE
City Clerk
TO: TOM HEDGES, CITY ADMINISTRATOR
FROM: JAY BERTHE, POLICE CHIEF
SUBJECT: BOMB SQUAD AGREEMENT WITH ST. PAUL POLICE DEPARTMENT
Attached is an agreement for services of St. Paul Police
Department's Bomb Squad to assist the Eagan Police Department,
as necessary.
Under Item #6 the minimum call out fee is $600.00 for up to
four hours, after four hours the hourly fee increases to $150.
Our calls pertaining to explosives in a year are very minimal,
however, it is our department's responsibility to handle a
call of this nature.
Since receiving the attached agreement from St. Paul Police in
the later part of December, 1987, all police departments in
Dakota County have been concerned about what action should be
taken.
Minneapolis Police Department charges the same amount as
St. Paul and they would assist us, if in fact, we had to call
them. There is no formal agreement with Minneapolis.
The findings showed that only three Police Departments have
bomb squads, those being St. Paul and Minneapolis Police and
the Airport Police.
Upon research I have found the following:
#1. Airport Police will assist Eagan at no cost, because we
have a mutual aid agreement with them. The only reason
they would not assist us is if they were too busy
themselves.
42. The State Legislature realizes that a problem exists for
smaller departments, and rumor has it that a bill will be
passed in 1988 stating that the state will pay the three
agencies who have bomb squads, if in fact, they are
called out. The problem is that the monies won't be in
place until 1989.
THE LONE OAK TREE THE SYMBOL OF STRENGTH AND GROWTH IN OUR COMMUNITY
Page 2
BOMB SQUAD AGREEMENT WITH ST. PAUL POLICE DEPARTMENT
I would suggest that the City of Eagan enter into the
agreement with St. Paul Police by signing the last page.
There would be no cost involved unless the Airport Police were
unable to assist us for any reason.
If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me.
Sincerely, ,
JMB/ l b
ATT:
/1 1 „ j"
Jay / . Berthe
r Poli e Chief
GEORGE LATIMER
MAYOR
recerber 28, 1987
Chief Jay Berthe
Eagan Police Dept.
3830 Pilot Knob Rd.
Eagan, MN 55122
7, n7 Chief Berthe:
The City of Saint Paul has in rho past provided the assistance of its Bomb
.' 1uad t:) outside a; enci es without obligation. The increased cost associated
in r :,aiP'.:a1in1rg such a unit .!id the limited _.2nds available ;ic ie
i::wlementataon of a revised rciic• -'.
I hope you understand the need and rationale behind this position. it is an
honest a te:i.or. zo address a Drool' l in a reasonable and forthright manner . Tt
is totally I.ithout justification to <";.pect the citizens of St. Paul tC T J` _'•.
:such a s to surrounding cities without a reasonable and
sharing of expenses.
Therefore, beginning j,z.nuary 1, requests for bcmb squad . isis'r :Aloe will
only be honcred upon acceptance of the enclosed contract. _ kou.:.d .ij :Jreci to
a response from your departmont .ihlether or not you wish to afford y c :ir
community of this service.
Sincerely,
'41. �'4. 14 C 'cheen
CHIEF OF POLICE
'raMcC:nj
Enc.
CITY OF SAINT PAUL
DEPARTMENT OF POLICE
Wm. W McCutcheon, Chief of Police
100 East Eleventh Street
Saint Paul, Minnesota 55101
612 - 291 -1111
The requesting party noted below and the City of Saint Paul, acting
by and through its Police Department, agree as follows:
(1) That the Police Department has a staffed unit commonly
referred to as the Bomb Squad which is assigned to the business of
securing, dismantling or handling explosives, military ordnance,
fireworks, and /or suspected explosive devices and explosive materials
(ED /EM).
(2) That any call for the assistance of the Bomb Squad by the
requesting party will be responded to with at least two trained
technicians with such equipment as needed to secure, dismantle or handle
ED /EM. However, the Bomb Squad may defer responding to or suspend
performance for the requesting party in deference to providing its
services to the City of Saint Paul without penalty or liability of any
kind, but will respond or renew performance when feasible to do so.
(3) That the requesting party is responsible for, and at its own
expense, crowd control and the evacuation of the site of ED /EM to the
satisfaction of the Bomb Squad. Additionally, the requesting party
shall provide at its own expense escort service for the Bomb Squad
should it elect to transport ED /EM to a disposal site and has need of an
escort.
(4)
shall not.
(5)
BOMB SQUAD AGREEMENT
Saint Paul, Minnesota Police Department
That hoax, ruse or misinformation as to the nature of ED /EM
diminish the obligations herein of the requesting party.
That the requesting party acknowledges that the work of the
Bomb Squad is extremely hazardous; that the requesting party cannot
address any given situation involving the presence of ED /EM; that the
methodology of securing, handling or disposing of ED /EM is an exercise
of judgment and so then the performance of the Bomb Squad is not open to
question by the requesting party. Accordingly, the requesting party
1
will not in any manner or form allege, assert, suggest or imply
negligence on the part of the Bomb Squad as to its performance hereunder
nor plead the same in court of law or other forum. Further, the
requesting party acknowledging the vital service of the Bomb Squad in
responding to any request for its service on behalf of the requesting
party will indemnify, save and hold harmless the Bomb Squad, the City of
Saint Paul Police Department and the City of Saint Paul from any and all
claims of whatever kind or nature, including those claims of personal
injury, death or property damage, as such may arise in whatever form or
fashion or flowing directly or indirectly from the performance of the
Bomb Squad. This pledge of indemnification by the requesting party
includes any of said claims as they should arise from the intentional
detonation or release of ED /EM. This pledge of indemnification does not
include the workers compensation claims of the Bomb Squad. -
(6) That the requesting party will pay to the Saint Paul Police
Department a minimum fee of Six Hundred Dollars ($600.00) per call for
the Bomb Squad's services. This fee is calculated on the basis of four
hours to service any call at an hourly rate of One Hundred Fifty
($150.00) Dollars. However, any call lasting more than four hours '`
shall, besides the minimum fee, be paid for by the requesting party at
the rate of One Hundred Fifty ($150.00) Dollars per hour for each hour
or part thereof in excess of four hours.
(7) That the duration and hazard of any call is dependent upon
many factors, but in any event shall be determined at the sole
discretion of the Bomb Squad.
(8) That if the requesting party's call for Bomb Squad services is
to a place outside of the seven county metropolitan area, the requesting
party shall pay besides the rates reflected above, out -of- pocket costs
of the Bomb Squad for food and lodging.
ri (9) That the requesting party may at its option elect to contract
for the services of the Bomb Squad on a one -year, 24- hour -a -day basis.
The fee for this program is One Thousand Eight Hundred ($1,800) Dollars
and will further include a two hour training class on ED /EM at the
requesting party's facilities at a mutually agreed to date and time.
This program includes all of the above terms as to the requesting
party's obligations excepting the fee schedule above. If this service
is selected by requesting party, check the box preceding this paragraph,
sign this agreement and return it with your draft.
REQUESTING PARTY
Aped as to,Form:
� G (� U f
Assistant City Attorney
By
Its
By
Its
CITY OF SAINT PAUL
Chief of Police.
Mayor
Director, Department of Finance
and Management Services
0-14u -14,1c.tce,ki
Agenda Information Memo
April 5, 1988, City Council Meeting
PUBLIC'HEARINGS.,
PROJECT 522 /STREETLIGHTS
A. Project 522, Ridgeview Acres (Streetlights) - -In response to
a petition submitted by a majority of the residents within this
single- family subdivision, the Council authorized the preparation
of a feasibility report for the installation of ornamental
streetlights. This report was presented to the Council on March
1 with the public hearing being scheduled for April 5. Enclosed
on pages 49 through S 3 is a copy of the feasibility report
for the Council's information and review during the public
hearing presentation by the Public Work's Director. All notices
have been published in the legal newspaper and sent to all
affected property owners informing them of this public hearing.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To close the public
hearing and approve /deny Project 522 (Ridgeview Acres -
Streetlights) and, if approved, authorize the installation
through Dakota Electric Association in accordance with the
existing franchise agreement.
8
CITY OF EAGAN
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
FEASIBILITY REPORT
FOR
STREETLIGHTING - PROJECT NO. 522
RIDGEVIEW ACRES
JANUARY 29, 1988
I hereby certify this report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision
and that I am a duly registered Professional Engineer under the laws of the
State of Minnesota.
omas A. Colbert, P.E.
Registration 1:uJiber 1201119
PRELIMINARY REPORT ON STREETLIGHTING
FOR RIDGEVIEW ACRES
PROJECT NO. 522
EAGAN MN
JANUARY 29, 1988
SCOPE: This project covers the installation of street lights serving the
residents of Ridgeview Acres, East of Blackhawk Road in the SE 1/4 of Section
17, Eagan.
FEASIBILITY AND RECOMMENDATIONS: This project is feasible and is in
accordance with the City's policy on the installation of street lights in
residential areas. It can best be accomplished as outlined herein and not as
a part of any other project.
DISCUSSION: Residents of Ridgeview Acres have petitioned for the installation
of streetlights. This addition and the unplatted property south of Kyllo Lane
contains 54 lots and /or parcels which would benefit from street lighting.
This area was developed before the City of Eagan adopted a comprehensive
street lighting policy. Since the enactment of this policy, all new additions
have been required to install street lights. The above - mentioned policy also
has a provision enabling older additions to petition for street lights. Under
this provision, the cost of street light installation is assessed against the
benefited lots and the energy charge is paid quarterly by the residents along
with their water and sewer bill.
The energy needs for Ridgeview Acres are serviced by Dakota Electric
Association, and they offer the type of street lighting poles, lighting
fixtures and the necessary maintenance service required by the City for
residential street lighting in accordance with the City of Eagan's street
lighting policy.
It is proposed to have three overhead and 12 ornamental streetlights for a
total of 15 installed.
OVERHEAD STREETLIGHTS: These 3 streetlights would be the standard overhead
design with 30' fiberglass poles, a 6' aluminum mast, and a "Cobra" type
fixture, with a 150 watt high pressure sodium luminaire. These lights,
transformers, underground wires and related restoration are proposed to be
installed by Dakota Electric Association.
ORNAMENTAL STREET LIGHTS: These 13 streetlights would be the standard
ornamental design with 100 watt high pressure sodium luminaire mounted on
standard fiberglass poles. These lights, transformers, underground wires and
related restoration are proposed to be installed by Dakota Electric
Association.
PRELIMINARY REPORT ON STREETLIGHTING
FO'3 RIDGEVIEW ACRES
PROJECT NO. 522
EAGAN MN
JANUARY 29, 1988
COST ESTIMATE: The following cost estimate includes the cost of construction,
administration, legal and other related project costs.
3 each 250 watt overhead $ 2,100.00
high pressure sodium @ $700
12 each 100 watt ornamental high 8,
pressure sodium @ $700
SUBTOTAL $10,500.00
5% contingency factor 525.00
15% administration cost 1,575.00
TOTAL $12,600.00
REVENUE SOURCES: Revenue sources to cover the cost of this project are
assessments against the benefited lots.
COST REVENUE
Installation $12,600.00
Assessments $12,600.00
ASSESSMENTS: Assessments are proposed to be levied in accordance with current
City policy and spread equally on a per lot basis. All costs of the Project
will be assessed.
Estimated Assessments are as follows:
Estimated assessment $233.33/lot
Energy charge to be billed with 2.65/lot
water and sewer per quarter
Assessments would be spread over five (5) years at a rate of interest
determined by the bond sale necessary to finance this project.
si
PRELIMINARY REPORT ON STREETLIGHTING
FOR RIDGEVIEW ACRES
PROJECT NO. 522
EAGAN MN
JANUARY 29, 1988
Area to be included:
RIDGEVIEW ACRES
Lots 1 -7, Block 1
Lots 1 -9, Block 2
Lots 1 -15, Block 3
Lots 1 -14, Block 4
JON CROFT ACRES (10- 18600)
012 -00
021 -00
031 -00
041 -00
050 -00
062 -00
072 -00
PARCELS
Section 17
011 -75
012 -75
PROJECT SCHEDULE:
Present Feasibility Report
Public Hearing
Approve Plans & Specifications
Construction Completion
Final Assessment Hearing
First Payment due with Real
Estate Tax Payment
March 1, 1988
April 5, 1988
Spring, 1988
Summer, 1988
Sept., 1988
May, 1989
SPECS
STLIGHT.RPT
RIDGE VIEW, ACRES
•
ua•TJ: 4T2 -oo:' ai•ucr.ra•
O 40•
�ROSEy :�
OPOSED 150 WATT OVERHEAD STREETLIGHT
OPOSED 100 WATT ORNAMENTAL STREET LIGHT
POSED STREET LIGHT ASSESSMENT AREA
STING 100 WATT ORNAMENTAL STREETLIGHT
PROJECT NO. 522
RIDGEVIEW ACRES
STRETLIGHTING
approved:
standard
plate #:
PR
PR
PRO
EXI
city of eagan
PUBLIC
WORKS
DEPARTMENT,
Agenda Information Memo
April 5, 1988, City Council Meeting
VACATION /PARTIAL RIGHT -OF -WAY
B. Vacation of Partial Right -of- Way - Blackhawk Hills Road &
Federal Drive - -The staff has received an application to vacate
the excess right -of -way previously acquired by MnDOT for the
construction of Federal Drive extension down to and including
Blackhawk Hills Road adjacent to the Stonpy Point and Blackhawk
Ridge development. Enclosed on page is a map showing the
excess right -of -way petitioned for vacation. The application has
been reviewed by staff to ensure that adequate public right -of-
way will remain as necessary to maintain all existing and
potential future streets, utilities, sidewalks, etc.
All notices have been published in the legal newspaper and sent
to all potentially affected utility companies. As of this date,
the staff has not received any objections or comments regarding
this proposed partial vacation.
Due to the title conveyance problems in the transfer of right -of-
way from MnDot to the City, the County has informed the City that
they do not have title to the property proposed to be vacated and
in turn is unable to convey the property to the adjacent property
owner.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To continue the public
hearing for the partial vacation of excess right -of -way for
Federal Drive and Blackhawk Hills Road until the City receives
the appropriate title to the property.
i jcsvrtp / uo C/
/ Reg/ Tok Dv a opm
,,y
r• r.t <•: Tr'. tit yr 1r ;. r: it
t'r'r y , •■"."
: Intl rsiral "to 1
tnta: t Ile , •• , ?st 1 Ina of tw,-. ter
23 1-ht
, ‘1 of Tr.: -+E 7 E1
; n• al 7rn rtrrly .Ind •
r lh` ! 1 - .! •.r
ion •1o.' i ir■ • r•ri .t"
-• r•f t•‘•••• o 3; t••t said
• 1r ir' pro 1 .- ot.ortelsor.1 tn tot ...-.1 of
th
2 ot Wiy Plat. 'hot' 1 v
01) - t , v1 1 r 11 L w ‘ f- .10.1cr
■! in, • •• , f the •oos1 ly
• • r I iro -' • .i < 0E I ly
.-• Zt.1x 1 r • I: 1 ir. •
• •o' r I" •
• 1 lre rl•
-9 '''
, Z, ::,....• /% of f' • 1,' i. 1 ' ;, or 1A 5 e 1/4
C a;'
2o. U)
tn
✓ 1
OUTL..."T ' B 4 I—I 7
q° /, 1
• /
I /
...,1-5,...6--
f:-:-:.:- • •
L,J
1
: 1 t 2 L'; y y ;- .. .L,,..,
• ::::::: 2:. x ,.. x ...„.:".:.::::::::::.:
Po,' 0 11 i
,, 4 4 /
N •S f•V/3 " r . / i
•,, .1 , 0 1 3 \
`, N 2
■ 1
\ 5 1
RIDGE
B L AC KH A W1-;
$4.0., 1 N 6 1 of
Scco r"..p.11; A"Ic O1ko4v
Agenda Information Memo
April 5, 1988, City Council Meeting
VACATION /PARTIAL RIGHT -OF -WAY
C. Vacation of Partial Right -of -Way - Safari Pass - -Staff has
received an application to vacate excess public right -of -way that
was acquired by MnDOT for the construction of Safari Pass as a
part of the I -35E Interstate construction program. Enclosed on
page is a map showing the excess of right -of -way requested
to be vacated by the developer of the adjacent Safari Pass
Addition. The legal description has been reviewed by staff to
ensure that adequate public right -of -way will remain after this
partial vacation as necessary to accommodate all existing and
potential future public improvements.
All notices have been published in the legal newspaper and sent
to all potentially affected utility companies informing them of
this public hearing. As of this date, no objections or comments
have been received on this issue.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To close the public
hearing and approve /deny the vacation of partial right-of-way
(Safari Pass) and, if approved, authorize the Mayor and City
Clerk to execute all related documents.
J-TL3r A
w
\
6\
Iof II_ I11n1t1
.. L■NL Cf Tr1i V 44
E • - E IS of St 4-
0
0
I
1 t
6E C RNER OF
7(J& rF A OP
SeCTI04 °I ,TNIO 27,
K4F.1 3 OAKOTA Co.
� Ira w .+.w. FY. leV.. w.
..Y. /M V,.a 04 N L••• 04 &.M/Nato W4/ 0..1
•
PESCRIPTfoN SKETCH
bun Qarf o4
TUE 4E 14 oF S.E 14 oF SE6T1oN 3 )
co('' /V1ERITOR DEVELOPMENT"
RIGHT OF hAY TO BE VACATED
The westerly 20.00 feet of Minnesota Department of Transpor
Way Plat too. 19 -14 lying within the Southeast Quarter of
Quarter of Section 31, Township 27, Rake 23, Dakota County,
The easterly line bf said 20.00 feet strip of land
5ortened to terminate at the south and east lines of
garter of the Southeast .darter.
wrw �k,•.,.,y AU.Ie.�i/ / //
tation Right of
the Southeast
Minnesota.
is prolonged or
said Southeast
Agenda Information Memo
April 5, 1988, City Council Meeting
-OLD BUSINESS
FIELD AGREEMENTS /INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT 196
A. Field Agreements for Independent School District #196 and
the City of Eagan - -At the last regular meeting of the City
Council held on March 15, 1988, it was the request of City
Attorney Paul Hauge that the joint use field agreements to be
executed between School District 196 and the City of Eagan for
joint use of athletic fields be continued to the April 5
meeting. The staff of both jurisdictions is proposing a joint
powers agreement that will call for certain maintenance,
ownership and other responsibilities for joint recreational and
athletic field operations.
The joint field use agreements were distributed without page
number with the last City Council packet. A memo containing
staff comments will be included with the Additional Information
packet distributed on Monday.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny
execution of the joint field use agreement between Independent
School District 196 and the City of Eagan as presented.
Agenda Information Memo
April 5, 1988, City Council Meeting
DEFINITION OF EAGAN /MENDOTA HEIGHTS AIRCRAFT CORRIDOR
B. Definition of Eagan /Mendota Heights Aircraft Corridor - -A
joint workshop session was held by the Mendota Heights and Eagan
City Councils at the Metropolitan Airports Commission offices on
Monday, March 28. The purpose of the meeting was to reach a
mutual agreement between the cities of Eagan and Mendota Heights
along with the MAC and FAA on an acceptable aircraft corridor for
both arrival and departure flights. Though a joint action was
not reached by both city councils at the meeting, it was the
consensus of Eagan councilmembers to accept a modification to
alter Alternative 2 that allows an assigned heading of 100 from
11L (Mendota Heights) and 115 11R, which allows for the proper
aircraft separation. The City of Mendota Heights is expected to
act on this issue at their regular Council meeting on Tuesday,
April 5. The recommendations of both cities will be sent to the
Metropolitan Advisory Sound Abatement Council (MASAC) and once
they conclude their findings, an ultimate decision will be made
by the Metropolitan Airports Commission with the directive to the
FAA.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny a
definition of the Eagan /Mendota Heights aircraft corridor as a
modification to Alternative 2 that allows an assigned heading of
100 from 11L and 115 from 11R and, further, that this
recommendation be forwarded to MASAC.
j �.
Agenda Information Memo
April 5, 1988, City Council Meeting
BIETER VS CITY OF EAGAN LAWSUIT SETTLEMENT
C. Review and Consider Proposed Settlement of Bieter vs City of
Eagan Lawsuit Regarding Proposed Diffley Center Project - -In the
spring of 1987, a lawsuit was brought against the City of Eagan
by the Bieter Development Company requesting among several items,
the rezoning of their property that was denied by both the
Advisory Planning Commission and City Council. The City of
Eagan, like all municipalities, utilizes the Executive Session to
review pending litigation, a procedure that was used by City
Councils since the receipt of the Bieter action.
At the February 16, 1988, City Council meeting, a proposed
settlement agreement by the Bieter Company was given
consideration. There was no consensus for accepting their
settlement offer and, therefore, no action was taken by the City
at that time. The City Council had indicated a specific
compromise prior to the February 16 Council consideration,
familiar to the Bieter Company per negotiations by legal counsel.
During late February /early March, the City was again contacted by
the Bieter Company and asked to consider a settlement which
closely aligned the compromise that had been given consideration
by the City Council prior to the February 16 meeting in Executive
Session. An Executive Session was held following the March 15
City Council meeting and by unanimous action of the
Councilmembers present, the City Attorney was directed to respond
and negotiate on behalf of the City, the new settlement agreement
offered by the Bieter Company. Copies of the draft settlement
agreement were distributed to the entire City Council for review.
In keeping with the City's policy that Executive Session be used
to discuss strategy and provide direction to the City Attorney
for negotiating lawsuits and that any action to consider an
actual settlement be scheduled at a regular meeting, it was
determined by the City Council that the settlement agreement be
placed on the April 5 City Council meeting agenda for further
review and consideration.
For additional information on this item, refer to the City
Attorney's memo which is enclosed without page number.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny a
settlement of the Bieter vs City of Eagan lawsuit per conditions
outlined by the City Attorney and City Council.
e
0
Agenda information Memo
April 5, 1988, City Council Meeting
BLUE BELL ICE CREAM TO OPERATE ON PUBLIC STREETS
D. Request (Blue Bell Ice Cream) to Operate on Public Streets
Within the City of Eagan - -The Blue Bell Ice Cream Company has
operated ice cream trucks on public streets in the City of Eagan
during both 1986 and 1987 subject to certain conditions. For a
copy of those conditions, refer to a letter prepared by the City
Administrator that summarizes action of the City Council one (1)
years ago on March 17, 1987, found on page (c.21- For a copy
of the business solicitation license requested by Blue Bell Ice
Cream, Inc., refer to page (s) c`0 Via- p - . The Eagan Police
Department has investigated the applicant and is recommending
approval.
If the City Council supports this application for a business
license, there should be certain conditions. Please refer to
the attached letter with or without modification.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny a
business solicitation license in the name of Blue Bell Ice Cream
to operate on public streets within the City of Eagan and if
approval is given, such action is subject to a number of
conditions.
3830 PILOT KNOB ROAD. P.O. BOX 21199
EAGAN. MINNESOTA 55121
PHONE (612) 454 -8100
March 19, 1987
city of Cagan
MR GLEN BARON
BLUE BELL ICE CREAM INC
3218 SNELLING AVE
MPLS MN 55406
Re: Approval for Blue Bell Ice Cream, Inc.
to Operate on Public Streets Within the City of Eagan
Dear Mr. Baron:
BEA BLOMOUIST
Mayor
THOMAS EGAN
JAMES A. SMITH
VIC ELLISON
THEODORE WACHTER
Council Mdmoers
THOMAS HEDGES
Cry Aamnistrotor
EUGENE VAN OVERBEKE
C ty Clerk
In official action that was taken by the City Council at a regular
meeting held on Tuesday, March 17, 1987, Blue Bell Ice Cream
Inc., was given approval to operate ice cream trucks on public
streets throughout the City of Eagan.
The action was taken subject to the following conditions: 1) Sub-
mission of an insurance certificate providing the same level
of liability as provided in a letter from your insurance agency
to the City of Eagan in 1986; 2) hours of operation will be
12:00 noon to 15 minutes prior to sunset; 3) the approval is
granted from April 1 until October 1, 1987; 4) the trucks will
not generate a- _noise level greater than 65 decibels; 5) caution
swing arms will be required on each vehicle; and 6) local employ-
ment will be used for drivers operating in Eagan.
Our Police Department has again been instructed to record any
and all complaints that may be received regarding operation
of the ice cream truck. If there are serious complaints, the
City Council reserves the right to revoke the special use permit
and variance to the ordinance at any time.
If you have any questions regarding the action taken by the
City Council, feel free to contact me at any time.
Sincerely,
Ito
Thomas L. Hedges
City Administrator
cc: Jay Berthe, Chief of Police
E. J. VanOverbeke, City Clerk /Director of Finance
TLH /kf THE LONE OAK TREE. THE SYMBOL OF STRENGTH AND GROWTH IN OUR COMMUNITY
u
CITY OF EAGAN
BUSINESS SOLICITATION LICENSE
(For Profit)
BUSINESS NAME: &: TC Cr�ar�,�r/c PHONE:
LOCATION OF SALES:
DOOR - TO - DOOR
NAME & DESCRIPTION OF PRODUCT: i c/7
VEHICLE USED FOR THIS BUSINESS:
MAKE 1ODEL YEAR STAT
LENGTH OF TIME REQUIRED IN CITY: , / � ,
DATES OF ACTIVITY IN CITY FROM: ./1 ,( l TO: _e. 7
OTHER COMMUNITIES WHERE SAME PERMIT WAS ISSUED: u; r7S r/:/1 S;; veF
HAVE YOU EVER E EN CONVICTED OF A FELONY, GROSS MISDEMEANOR, OR
MISDEMEANOR, INCLUDING VIOLATION OF A MUNICIPAL ORDINANCE BUT EX
CLUDING TRAFFIC VIOLATIONS?
NO V YES IF YES, EXPLAIN ON REVERSE SIDE, THE DATE AND
PLACE OF CONVICTION AND THE NATURE OF THE OFFENSE.
ATTACH A COMPLETE LIST OF ALL SOLICITORS, INCLUDING EACH PERSON'S
FULL NAME (FIRST, MIDDLE, LAST), ADDRESS (STREET,CITY,STATE,ZIP),
PHONE NUMBER, AND DATE OF BIRTH.
ORDINANCE ALLOWS A FIVE -DAY (DUSINESS DAYS) WAITING PERIOD BETWEEN THE APPLICATION AND ISSUANCE
OF IHE LICENSE DURING WHICH TIME THE POLICE SHALL HAKE AH INVESTIGATION OF THE APPLICANT'S BUSINESS _
MORAL CHARACTER. THE LICENSE MAY BE ISSUED WHEN THE FOREGOING INVESTIGATION IS COMPLEICD OR WITHIN
FIVE DUSINESS DAYS.OF APPLICATION, WHICHEVER IS EARLIER.
1 SWEAR AND ATTEST TO THE FACT THAT TIIE PRECEDING INFORMATION IS TRUE AND CORRECT, TO THE
BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE. I ALSO GIVE MY PERMISSION TO INVESTIGATE ANY OR ALL OF THE PERSONS
LISTED, AS DEEMED NECESSARY BY Inc CITY.
POLICE APPROVAL
/l764 ' !/ Ler -1,x S
ADD
OF APPLICANT
(IF MORE THAN ONE, LIST SEPARATELY)
DATE CITY CLERK DATE
THE APPLICATION FORM MUST BE
:PROPERLY COMPLETED OR IT WILL
NOT BE PROCESSED.
LICENSE NUMBER
DATE
DATE
2,88
v �Ju
$25
$ 5
LICENSE GOOD FOR UP TO ONE YEAR
AP ?LI CANT ' S NAME:
LOCAL ADDRESS:
HOME PHONE:
BIRTH DATE: G 2/ SOCIAL SECURITY NO. (5 —g"
DRIVER' S LICENSE: ( ;7.�(9 2 � 6'7 y7:5
NUMBER STATE
APPLICANT'S CURRENT AND PREVIOUS ADDRESSES FOR THE THREE YEARS
PRECEDING THE DATE OF APPLICATION:
(2)
FIRM
investigation ree Non- Reundable)
License for up to three solicitors
For each additional solicitor
STREET
APPLICANT'S CURRENT AND PREVIOUS OCCUPATIONS FOR THREE YEARS PRECEDING
THE DATE OF APPLICATION:
S 7-1 e-
NAMES AND ADDRESSES OF APPLICANT'S EMPLOYERS, IF ANY, FOR THE THREE
YEARS IMMEDIATELY PRECEDING THE DATE OF APPLICATION:
NAME
FIRST FULL MIDDLE LAST
STREET
CITY . STATE ZIP
72, 6•1-- 5 ,2 ,j BUSINESS PHONE: 72a=Z.2C
( )�-./ e -t � G l - lC?_4 ,�. T� /;7.
FIRM 'STREET
SUPERVISOR
SUPERVISOR
NAME
Sfe" ve
U GLv 6'P`7J1 - t
, ri ,1e_. / /e
OCCUPATION
THE APPLICATION FORM MUST BE
*PROPERLY COMPLETED OR IT WILL*
NOT BE PROCESSED.
CITY OF EAGAN
BUSINESS SOLICITATION LICENSE
/` - (FOR PROFIT)
( // &
CITY & STATE ZIP
STREET, CITY & STATE
CITY
STREET
CITY
STATE
STATE
STREET, CITY & STATE ZIP
eV!? t i f-arce sq./c ,S . "qv
2� f rriel` ,r
1- • -
ZIP
ZIP
FROM
FROM
TO
ZIP
/77;
FROM
PHONE TO
PHONE TO
PRESENT
TO
PRESENT
FROM
FOUR CHARACTER REFERENCES (IF APPLICANT HAS NOT RESIDED IN THE CITY
FOR TWO YEARS IMMEDIATELY PRECEDING DATE OF APPLICATION):
A.C. TELEPHONE NO.
7 ) ci
3 7 yn
>p -GS 977'
Agenda Information Memo
April 5, 1988, City Council Meeting
'.NEW BUSINESS
REOUEST FOR A BUSINESS SOLICITATION LICENSE/
PENGUIN ICE CREAM
A. Request (Penguin Ice Cream, Inc.) to Operate on Public
Streets Within the City of Eagan - -The City has received an
application from Penguin Ice Cream, Inc., to operate an ice
cream truck on public streets in Eagan. The Police Department
has investigated this applicant and is recommending approval.
Enclosed on pages (Q through V7 is a copy of the business
solicitation license application. If the City Council desires
the issuance of a second business solicitation license for the
purpose of distributing ice cream sales on public streets, it is
recommended that the conditions set forth for the Blue Bell Ice
Cream license also be applied to the Penguin Ice Cream, Inc.,
license authorization.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny a
business solicitation license in the name of Penguin Ice Cream
Inc. as presented.
(Qs
CITY OF EAGAN
BUSINESS SOLICITATION LICENSE
(For Profit)
BUSINESS NAME:
MAKE
NO \,///'
YES
L Y`
/A10 _Lee l r Phi. vvt
raw. a �
SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT
•
1 C
d a r es / de 4.
\PPR0(✓A DATE CITY CLERK
THE APPLICATION FORM MUST BE
:PROPERLY COMPLETED OR IT WILL
NOT BE PROCESSED.
BUSINESS
PHONE: 779 77 2.
mss /
LOCATION OF SALES: 7/C V n cia., 1`A S fi. Sf Y'1 r( sj / L{ r
ADDRESS DOOR -TO -DOOR
NAME & DESCRIPTION OF PRODUCT: ,n d (ureic <a.e L urt` 1 "
7tc7NY7 l oci C 6
VEHICLE USED FOR THIS VUSINESS: (IF MORE THAN ONE, LIST SEPARATELY)
5 "f c /a Va�---
MODEL ! YEAR STATE LICENSE NUMBER
LENGTH OF TIME REQUIRED IN CITY:
DATES OF ACTIVITY IN CITY FROM: . ('pct Q TO: 4 .
OTHER COMMUNITIES WHERE SAME PERMIT WAS ISSUED: 09 c, lLiu.i (c-r-t t / fV'�7 ,
•
cf7J CL� �C'7'J ..�Q'1 �/ L V
HAVE YOU EVER BEEN CONVIC'ED iO %.G F A FE6ONY, GROSS MISDEMEANOR, OR
MISDEMEANOR, INCLUDING VIOLATION OF A MUNICIPAL ORDINANCE BUT EX
CLUDING TRAFFIC VIOLATIONS ?'
IF YES, EXPLAIN ON REVERSE SIDE, THE DATE AND
PLACE OF CONVICTION AND THE NATURE OF THE OFFENSE.
ATTACH A COMPLETE LIST OF ALL SOLICITORS, INCLUDING EACH PERSON'S
FULL NAME (FIRST, MIDDLE, LAST), ADDRESS (STREET,CITY,STATE,ZIP),
PHONE _NUMBER, A iD DATE OF " BIRTH. v t�'orvnatic 7t on !dicier w41( i.e Sc.�Lec2 aS
a s A e ac Sitti_ i s hired 1P..x�,ce,69 pAer A-d4 �'• � /� w e- o 'c
ORCINANCE ALLOTS A FIVE -DAY (DUSINESS DAYS) WAITING ERI00 UETWE N THE APPLICATION AND ISSUANCE
OF THE LICENSE DURING WHICH TINE THE POLICE SHALL Nara AN INVESTIGATIOd CF lHE AerLiCAUT'S OUSINESS
MORAL CHARACTER. THE LICENSE NAY BE ISSUED WHEN THE FOREGOING INVESTIGATION IS COMPLETED ON WLTHId
FIVE OUSINESS DAYS.OF APPLICATION, WHICHEVER IS EARLIER.
I SWEAR ANO ATTEST TO THE FACT THAT THE PRECEDING INFORMATION 15 TRUE AND CORRECT, TO THE
BEST OF NY KNOWLEOGE. I ALSO GIVE NY PERM1SSIOU TO INVESTIGATE ANY OR ALL OF THE PERSONS
LISTED, AS DEEMED NECESSARY BY THE CITY.
3/ Z fi g &
DATE
DATE
2;88
✓ 550
✓ 525
$ 5
LICENSE. GOOD FOR UP TO ONE YEAR
APPLICANT S NAME: (' ckI
FIRST
LOCAL ADDRESS:
HOME PHONE:
BIRTH DATE:
DRIVER'S LICENSE: rte-
APPLICANT'S CURRENT
PRECEDING THE DATE OF
(2)
FIRM
Investigation Fee (Non— Refundable)
License for up to three solicitors
For each additional solicitor
STREET
53,3 ac 414,41,e S.
A ccO LAAA:ert -r.J
NAME
(1) Se_ L; ►1t Tretv L)C
FIRM
Sock r1 n ✓ • I et ( Yzh
SUPERVISOR
SUPERVISOR
C 'TY
771-77.
21136
NAME {n'
'/a %
( T.,4e 1 1.Jo lief 1L {a tin
7 f n l l y a ✓i tti (ce' r i. to (' : . (4 1 - 6 )
- PQ ho c A( 4nwKIn s
CITY OF EAGAN
BUSINESS SOLICITATION LICENSE
(FOR PROFIT)
11.5 �o
STREET
n Jt
THE APPLICATION FORM MUST BE
*PROPERLY COMPLETED OR IT WILL *.
* BE PROCESSED.
�hy\
FULL MIDDLE
cJ
STREET
STATE
BUSINESS PHONE:
SOCIAL SECURITY NO.
NUMBER STATE
AND PREVIOUS ADDRESSES FOR THE THREE YEARS
APPLICATION:
CITY & STATE ZIP
APPLICANT'S CURRENT AND PREVIOUS OCCUPATIONS FOR THREE YEARS PRECEDING
THE DATE OF APPLICATION:
OCCUPATION FROM
NAMES AND ADDRESSES OF APPLICANT'S EMPLOYERS, IF ANY, FOR THE THREE
YEARS IMMEDIATELY PRECEDING THE DATE OF APPLICATION:
STREET, CITY & STATE ZIP
n7J7
STATE
SS /c)3
F5 y5
SSyC 2
ZIP
STREET
CITY STATE ZIP
FOUR CHARACTER REFERENCES (IF APPLICANT HAS NOT RESIDED IN THE CITY
FOR TWO YEARS IMMEDIATELY PRECEDING DATE OF APPLICATION):
STREET, CITY & STATE ZIP
S-151 S-151 d Merrick/ 41.71715 --- I)
a /j c De laware i Au. Merrick/ 'JI,
sag Ctev•la„d Ave. CoutiA St.PccY Plf
19 C e , • A Sc c 1, ' • t ,J'm /7ssrRc
(9
Cleu
5E Arvar) r elnu.ti re t txpiS m4 SSy 14
( kc4 /l koo
LAST
oog
FROM
8 7
gIu
19R�
s
ZIP
TO
PHONE TO
PRESENT
•
TO
PRESENT
• 5/g
FROM
33 9 i;(7
FROM
PHONE TO
A.C. TELEPHONE NO.
ca n y5/ -3?
61:1 1;73 - 3474
rota- • 69X- 3 17
6, 379 —/3L3
Agenda Information Memo
April 5, 1988, City Council Meeting
COMP GUIDE, P.D. AMENDMENT AND PRELIMINARY PLAT
THOMAS LAKE WOODS
B. Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment, Meritor Development
Corporation for Thomas Lake Woods Project Including P.D.
Amendment from R -4, P.F. and R -3 to R -3 and R -1 and a Preliminary
Plat Consisting of 60 Townhouse Units and 27 Single Family Lots- -
An application was submitted by the Meritor Development
Corporation for a Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment, Planned
Development Amendment from R -4, P.F. and R -3 to R -3 and R -1 and a
preliminary plat entitled Thomas Lake Woods consisting of 60
townhouse units and 27 single family lots on 39.3 acres within
the Blackhawk Park P.D. The APC is recommending approval of this
item.
For additional information on this item, refer to the Planning
and Engineering Departments report found on pages (p c ( through
For a copy of the APC minutes, refer to pages
through .
For a coy of the Parks and Recreation Commission action, refer
to page
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny 1) the
Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment, 2) the P.D. amendment from R-
4, P.F. and R -3 to R -3 and R -1 and 3) a preliminary plat
consisting of 60 townhouse units and 27 single family lots.
CITY OF EAGAN
SUBJECT: PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AMENDMENT (REZONING),
PRELIMINARY PLAT, VARIANCE
(THOMAS LAKE WOODS ADDITION)
APPLICANT: MERITOR DEVELOPMENT CORP
LOCATION: SW 1/4, SECTION 28
EXISTING ZONING: PLANNED DEVELOPMENT
DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: FEBRUARY 25, 1988
DATE OF REPORT: FEBRUARY 17, 1988
REPORTED BY: PLANNING AND ENGINEERING DEPARTMENTS
APPLICATIONS: Separate applications have been submitted
requesting a Rezoning of 39.3 acres containing R -4 (multiple), PF
(public facilities), and R -3 (townhouse) districts within the
Blackhawk Park Planned Develooment to two districts containing
sixty owner - occupied townhouses and twenty -seven single- family
lots, a Preliminary Plat for Thomas Lake Woods Addition, and a
Variance for a cul -de -sac in excess of 500'. This site is
located west of Thomas Lake Road and abutts the NSP highline
easement on the north. The overall density of the plat is 2.2
units per acre and does conform to the January 1987 Land Use Plan
that designates this area D -II, 0 -6 units per acre.
EXISTING CONDITIONS: This site is heavily wooded along the
north, south, and east property lines. The 'remaining area is
open grassland. Two pipeline easements bisect this property; the
Williams Brothers line in a north /south manor and the Northern
Natural Gas line from the west to the southeast. Mallard Drive
will be extended to the east, connecting to Thomas Lake Road.
That road and the two easements along with the woods and ponds
make this site rather difficult to develop. This site plan is
sensitive to the existing' conditions. Most of the wooded areas
will be saved and used as a buffer from the adjacent property.
Undeveloped general business zoned land in the Safari at Eagan
Addition abutts to the south. The developer submitted a
landscape plan that provides a dense buffer along that property
line. The proposed landscaping throughout the multiple area
blends nicely with the existing conditions and exceeds the
minimum standards of the City's Landscape Policy.
Three cul -de -sacs connecting to Mallard Drive will serve this
site. Two of them are approximately 650' and 700' long. The
southern one serves thirty -six multiple units and the northern
one serves seventeen single- family homes. Meritor intends to
sell the single - family lots to two or three builders. All of
these lots meet Code size requirements. They vary in size from
12,700 SF to 51,075 SF. The largest lots back up to the Highline
Easement. A pedestrian connection will be made from the Highline
Trail to the northern cul -de -sac. The gross density in the
single - family area is 1.8 units /acre.
The multiple area looks like a typical quad unit on paper but the
proposed buildings are different from any in Eagan at this time.
Each unit can be modified to meet the wants and needs of the
individual owner. The architect has a similar project in
Burnsville located on the northwest corner of Portland Avenue and
South Cross Drive. The proposed sixty units on 11.7 acres give
that portion of the plat a gross density of 5.1 units /acre. Code
requires 6,000 SF lots in R -3 districts and six are slightly
below that. The lot lines could be shifted to accommodate that
requirement; however, as proposed, the lots function just as well
and they will be maintained by the same Homeowners Association.
GRADING /DRAINAGE /EROSION CONTROL: The existing topography of the
site ranges in elevation from 906 along the easterly line to
approximately 990 along the westerly property line. The
topography for the most part slopes from west to east. Three low
areas exist along Thomas Lake Road. The most southerly low area
is designated as Pond BP -13 in the Comprehensive Storm Sewer
Plan. The site is crossed by four gas mains owned by Williams
Bros. Pipeline Co. and one gas main owned by Northern Natural Gas
Co. Due to the extreme differences in elevation and restrictions
placed on the site by the existing gas mains, slopes greater than
2 to 1 are proposed at different locations. It is recommended no
slopes greater than 3 to 1 be allowed and that retaining walls be
constructed if the maximum allowable 3 to 1 slope criteria cannot
be adhered to. At two locations street grades approach the
maximum allowable of 8% but none exceed 8% standard.
Drainage from the site is directed from west to east into the
three existing lower areas adjacent to Thomas Lake Road. The
majority of this development will discharge by storm sewer into
Pond BP -13. Pond BP -13 receives direct runoff from a total of
46.1 acres. The 46.1 total acres includes area in the proposed
development plus a portion of the Safari at Eagan commercial area
to the south. Pond BP -13 discharges through an existing 24"
storm sewer directly into Thomas Lake. One upstream pond
discharges into pond BP -13. This pond is located in the
southwest corner of Safari at Eagan, adjacent to Cliff Road.
Design requirements for each pond based their existing outlet
capacities pipes are listed below:
POND
Southwest corner
of Safari at Eagan
BP -13
DIRECT DRAINAGE STORAGE OUTFLOW
AREA
38.9 acres 5.3 Ac -Ft. 9 CFS
46.1 acres 3.6 Ac -Ft. 54 CFS
The Comprehensive Storm Sewer Plan identifies the storage volume
for Pond BP -13 as being 9 acre feet. This storage volume can be
obtained by constructing a small dike approximately 4 feet high
(Elev 928) adjacent to Thomas Lake Road along the easterly side
of the pond. In addition, the existing 24" outlet pipe from Pond
BP -13 must be restricted to a 3 CFS outflow. Safari at Eagan
presently discharges through an existing 36" pipe which ends at
the south line of the proposed Thomas Lake Woods Development and
then conveyed by an open ditch (approximately 400' long) to Pond
BP -13. Although the open ditch presently appears to be adequate,
increased development in Safari at Eagan will necessitate
defining the outlet to Pond BP -13.
The remaining drainage in Thomas Lake Woods is conveyed to two
existing low areas adjacent to Thomas Lake Road. The middle low
area will receive runoff from approximately 4.5 acres while the
northerly low area will receive runoff from 10.1 acres. To
provide an outlet for the middle low area a 15" storm sewer must
�1
be extended from the existing storm sewer in Thomas Lake Road.
The northerly low area is served by an extension of the proposed
storm sewer in Mallard Drive. It is recommended the northerly
low area be preserved as a City pond and provide storage for 1.3
acre feet between elevations 908 and 912 and its outflow be
restricted to 6 CFS.
Pond BP -6 located northwesterly of the proposed Thomas Lake Woods
Development presently does not have an outlet. The Comprehensive
Storm Sewer Plan identifies a 4.9 CFS lift station be constructed
at the easterly edge of Pond BP -6. It is recommended the
northerly pond in the Thomas Lake Woods Development ultimately
receive the runoff from Pond BP -6 when its outlet is constructed.
Given the requirements identified, the existing storm sewer in
Thomas Lake Road is properly sized to serve this development.
The main water resource concern of this site is the affect the
development will have on the water quality of Thomas Lake.
Runoff from the site passes through pond BP -13 prior to
discharging to Thomas Lake. Construction of wet detention ponds
on this site will be necessary to protect the water quality of
Thomas Lake. Erosion and sediment control issues as well as
water quality issues will need to be addressed before a grading
permit is granted or a final plat is approved.
UTILITIES: Trunk sanitary sewer of sufficient size and depth to
serve this development presently exists in Thomas Lake Road.
Connection to the existing 27" trunk sanitary sewer will require
the cutting of Thomas Lake Road and the construction of the
manhole and outside drop.
A 12" trunk water main is readily available.in Thomas Lake Road
to serve this development. The development will be responsible
for constructing an 8" water main in Mallard Drive from Thomas
Lake Road connecting to the existing 8" main in Mallard Drive at
the west line of this development. This development is located
in the high pressure zone. Homes built below elevation 955 will
require individual pressure reducing valves.
STREETS /ACCESS /CIRCULATION: Access to this development will be
provided by Thomas Lake Road on its east and Mallard Drive on the
west. All street are required to be constructed and right -of-
ways provided in accordance with City of Eagan code requirements.
EASEMENTS /RIGHT -OF- WAY /PERMITS: Sufficient right -of -way for
Thomas Lake Road has been provided in previous platting
processes.
The development would be responsible for providing appropriate
easements for all public utilities constructed outside of the
dedicated public right -of -way.
All regulatory agency permits shall be acquired within the
appropriate time frame as required by the affected agency.
CONDITIONS:
ASSESSMENTS: In accordance with special assessment policies in
effect at the time of the final assessment hearing, the proposed
development has been levied the following assessments:
PROJECT # DESCRIPTION
137
234
237
237/137
237
Sanitary Sewer Trunk
Water Area (Partial)
Thomas Lake Road
Sanitary Sewer Lateral Benefit
Water Lateral Benefit
There are no pending assessments of record and the following
assessments are proposed as a condition of final plat approval in
accordance with the special assessment policies in effect at this
time:
PROJ # DESCRIPTION RATE QTY AMT
237 Water Trunk 1,315/a 23.4 $30,771
237 Storm Sewer Trunk .056 /sf 679,536 38,054
237 Storm Sewer Trunk .070 /sf 509,652 35,676
237 Lateral Benefit
Storm Sewer 20.83/ff 460 9,582
237 Water Lateral
Upgrade 8.50 /ff 1,168 9,928
237 Thomas Lake Road
Upgrade 42.15/ff 448 18,•883
237 Trailway 13.00 /ff 1,168 15,184
TOTAL PROPOSED ASSESSMENTS $158,070
All final assessment obligations will be calculated based on the
quantities and dimensions on the final plat and in accordance
with the rates in effect at the time of the final plat approval.
1. These standard conditions of plat approval as adopted by Council
action on September 15, 1987 shall be complied with:
Al, Bl, B2, B3, B4, Cl, C2, C4, C5, D1, and El.
2 - A copy of the Townhouse Covenants and Bylaws shall be
reviewed by the City's attorney.
3 - The lot sizes in the multiple area shall be approved as on
the site plan.
4 - Variances for the cul -de -sacs in excess of 500' shall be
approved.
A. Assessments
STANDARD CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL
1. This development shall accept its additional assessment
obligations as defined in the staff's report in
accordance with the final plat dimensions and the rates
in effect at the time of final plat approval.
B. Easements and Rights
1. This development shall dedicate 10' drainage and utility
easements centered over all common lot lines and adjacent
to private property or public right -of -way.
2. This development shall dedicate, provide, or financially
guarantee its proportionate share of the acquisition
costs of additional drainage, ponding, and utility
easements as required by the alignment, depth, and
storage capacity of all required public utilities and
streets located beyond the boundaries of this plat or
outside of dedicated public right -of -way as necessary to
service this development.
3. This development shall dedicate all public right -of -way
and temporary slope easements for ultimate development of
adjacent roadways as required by the appropriate
jurisdictional agency.
4. This development shall dedicate adequate drainage and
ponding easements to incorporate the required high water
elevation necessitated by City storm water storage volume
requirements.
C. Plans and Specifications
1. All public streets and utilities necessary to provide
service to this development shall be designed by a
registered professional engineer in accordance with City
codes and engineering standards and policies, and
approved by staff prior to final plat approval.
2. A detailed grading, drainage, erosion, and sediment
control plan must be prepared in accordance with current
City standards and approved by staff prior to final plat
approval.
3. This development shall insure that all temporary dead end
public streets shall have a cul -de -sac constructed in
accordance with City engineering standards.
4. A detailed landscape plan shall be submitted on the
proposed grading plan and approved by staff prior to the
final plat approval. The financial guarantee shall be
included in the Development Contract and not released
until one year after the date of installation.
rl
STANDARD CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL
PAGE TWO
D. Public Improvements
1. If any public improvements are to be installed under a
City contract, the appropriate project must be approved
by Council action prior to final plat approval.
E. Permits
1. This development shall be responsible for the acquisition
of all regulatory agency permits in the time frame
required by the affected agency.
F. Parks Dedication
LTS #2
STANDARD
5. All internal public and private streets shall be
constructed within the required right -of -way in
accordance with City design standards.
1. This development shall fulfull its parks dedication
requirements as recommended by the Advisory Parks and
Recreation Commission and approved by Council action.
G. Other
1. All standard platting and zoning conditions shall be
adhered to unless specifically granted a variance by
Council action.
Advisory Planning Commission City Council
Approved: August 25, 1987 September 15, 1987
Revised:
r)S
1.67e,N11.-
d4- 1 1411 11 1.7
rYA-t • • /
•
--
LL4 A
• 4 -- I
Ll
-•N " t
• •
Lt•
, ••• V • -; •
'
•
••• ‘.1 4-•
'4•\ !
crs, ''nr1,44:f..1.
P6(34;
s ell/0 (41
T1
c
—1
• • , ---4.- _ I
` . , , . T "',''' --,...i. •
'''''Sf:i /I _ _ _—.....", • I , • s _ .,
/ ,.. .
‘,, ],,:, /,,, ,,, / .• 5.1-
, 0 ,1/4ii 11/4 , • ,
it
1.11,11".,j„-•
i
s`,/flY11114
1 :
' ; I ; • ,. i
' 1 /
I° I, 1 "‘ '., I , :' /,,' I' • i'i ,---, / / .
• , .I , \/,„„,
t%'‘,
-.".,‘,"‘;‘,....._, V• —
-'"7-Z.'.'‘•:•.,,','//
i .
/ 1
.
',II Is \ •, E i
„......
ti
‘ t i E
,s .,
----' ---' g :! i
---,—__1-
cof . 3 eld Kga
I I
cc :3
; .
t 1 t
EtgiEi44.2;:-1111
' . • 1 , ,
11 'I.I
L I
1\‘\-/''
;/
\ I , i
.„‘
a OM it
•
I 1/4
.,‘
•
\
I ,
••••••.4.
irg,,
/::
•,„4"
r • • ,
/ • • \\ • s," . 1
LI
,414.
4.•
atzi.;ifr,
_ _ , . . , a • • - -
- - - - "
___„-.. ------'-''
_ _ —,--------
- ,', \ , ■ \ -,
-rty0(1111--,---------------' -
4 / , I, /
i
\
i .
...•---------------- --- ----. s„ t s ____ ' ' \ \--•,:•>, /
```,\• \ s ` I•
, \,,''‘■ .., . , ,
—:_—_— — — — •••••- ` .
. .•
,/,..,:a------_— ---''''''\\‘\‘‘‘ ‘,\ 1 (---- ---\ - \ ,,,,,,., \-/--
i . ,..,..-
/ 1. , i 1
.■ : -- i-: - -- --7 - - -'-
5
I
,' I •"/ / - / r., /
1 I t ; ) / ./ ...\\i■
; • 1 , 1 \ .
i
\._ ,,,, . ,:i, ../:, T: •- (,,::\,‘,..\•\
1 i : ( 1;
5
\ I
t 5
1 •
N
•
ts
5 '
"s
I::
I 1 I "s• 1 ,.■ • I 8 3 1
‘,.,. k, .
.
1:;"
..,-- .1 v t, • I
i :El
1 PI
t !1
83- I §§
— ' 8 I
L(1
i 1
d
—
t'
_1
e • • •
•
), • !
s 9-E. • .
kL T f
- 77.
• -
/ $
/
• 11
•
5
l•
I
•-• :
- o
0
0
0
0
0
" 9 /
•
■
3Zi6
1_4 , 1
SOOk!
TIT
-r
GENUS/SPECIES
g
A
a
.,., 1.. r.7,
a
omv 1,0111
3wvN NOY6IO
uur ,J.••
•
1
F r,,..,.w' . .
S
- Pr.r un'+ + wl l
i
1i'KlliiS
f- - t'1 fI - Irll
- -_ 1111 Mori
LI
J
a s
1
� ` . rz.a`'X " ''',44,7t14......."4, ' ` �a ' a' ,..„ia 'f ..,
...,.1,._,..,,, ,i ., r ` �iy� 4 '�'" .? t ar...^.`.' ' 4 ...r.z. ., * ri.,, A. ,v;r .... • f, n T,
cai/'. + + ...,r r"� —= awl = ice+ _�.I1 X44 ►- aciG .F 1=
•
Si
i . �� . �5 . u�a� ' .� S f rila.. ' � ' � -r'as e:=
ltskkl W oods
PLANT LIST
. . 4., -- ,...-.•.--,_=,' '..:',. .7. . 0
:• `.---. 0. ---. T ,,, ' 1, ,-
• , ; .,,,,-... ett -` ,
■ 4: ,.;.., 4-, -N4 , i -:,,,,,,- • '-- '
• - ■ ,, , ""F1 ' e . a : • •• ' .7 i Yk4 ''''''': i -^ ‘ t;■ ,, .., 3
,..., „.. c
• • ....o.k,i1,,A::_,,.-v,:-•,- ,.. . ,..,: I ,,,.,,I.
l.?.,_\
il ,.. '-'‘''•-•:,..,, • ...:,,' .,.....,
., -.• 1144 .. - k -
• ": . 1 ;1 1'' ,"A 4 , : el
Ak
' •,- •
■Y.%:
. tf=f-cix.
` flit.'ertiirt *A „tit'
4Tk'
• '1
A
•
r4.
0.1 • ;I•••
••■-•t,ci
-C••• 1;;.. •••
- •*--).'-' - - t `•N-;'S4‘it
“ `
);1,5'",
....`• •
s ,o • 0 •■ 4 47,
( V'4
t4."..1- •••;?;
v. lif
?-1., ,..,, ..4,3,,,,,,,, - -ez
"' %•
t • - "';,•/,- --•-•.' ' ".1
- ',., -,A, .-., z- c f. r . ,•41.-4)-';-'Tki?v :,,.‘.'
a„.•1/4^-,_:.--,•,--.1,- •••.;,1 . ,t . ,, , „ . c
, : V.1 ____ — -
, ..... ; -.1.- o t,;‘
• . -.,
. l'Irl4W;;,,,,, • ‘ ..i M. r; I: , - .-Se:"It:1--'* 7 S? .1. ;
' v. - .L 4 :t ' } * ' ,A ' :" ,. \`... • 'r
• t.:.4,' -.• - 1.--; 4.•. ' , :i: 4, : ..,!--: ,,'^• .....e s *q:.c
, i '
..-. 4: , I ,t-,t.7,17,. * ,%
. .
. %I e
4 -
""
\ - 2T
v
ACk
) • r \..."1"; '
- • '44
TWO STORY - FIRST FLOOR - $98,900
Two DOOMS
PLANS .0r
BI
STANDARD UPSTAIRS
UNFINISHED SPACE
I
I OPTIONAL
UNFINISHED DORMER
$7,900
i
F
GARAGE
1• • a.-
DINING LIVING
10 - 0 • IQ -0 14-0. 14-•
1111111111110
BEDROOM
1?O• 13-3
BEDROOM
10-1. 11-0
ONE STORY - $76,900
ONE BEDROOM AND DEN
GARAGE
10-0 a 21-0
GARAGE
11 -0 • 21-0
PLANS
MUDROOM
KITCHEN •-S • 10 -0
10 -0 • 11-
DINING
1 0-0. 10-0
00011
KITCHEN
10-0 . 13-3r
ONE BEDROOM AND DEN WITH BASEMENT STMR
SCALE
— —
1
LJ La
LIVING
14-0 a 11-1
ortimac PA30
/
L._ I
L IWALK -111 CLOSET
J J
■
TWO STORY - FIRST FLOOR - Price per quote
. 1
E N
1WALX-01 CLOSET
I _
BEDROOM
10-0. 10-0
DEN
11-0 a 11-0
BEDROOM
11 -0 . 11 -1
i
HOMES
0* • •I
OPTIONAL. PORCH
11-0 a 11-,
OrT1dML y
AT11NY 00011 �
f r
J
UPSTAIRS OPTION 'A' - $9,900
FINISHED UPSTAIRS - NO DORMER
BEDROOM _
— — ss-o • 1s7
A 0 LINEN /�
U � V Y
BATH ORESSINO
wN
MASTER SUITE - WITH DORMER
MASTER SUITE
is -o • as-s
UPSTAIRS OPTION 'S' - $10,900
BATH
LINEN -4 - --
W ALX-I
CLOSET
oowN
BEDROOM
So • uo
BEDROOM
u -s
E
,►V 1 1i1
UPSTAIRS OPTION 'C' _ $11,900
TWO BEDROOMS - WITH DORMER
* Includes full or 3/4 bath
PLANS mon'
g3
GREAT ROOM
LAUNDRY
MECHANICAL
OPTICNAL FINISHED BASEMENT - $22,500
SUGGESTED BASEMENT PLAN
LAUNDRY • • •
MECHANICAL
BASEMENT
.4-• ■ •r•
CPTIONAL UNFINISHED BASEMENT - $10,500
PLANS .0 . X1
BEDROOM
10-. ■ IS -0
\‘. ..) • ■114. 44444 •••■• .ri 4; 4,
• . F Tani • . 1/1 <M. •• ,,
0 CO:1 ..- S 3:
, 1:1•CIDUOUS 100.40•11 - 3 nl. •••11. ;IT • ae..,.1.91 Olt
••••••••• tia.••••••. •■•••••••• ., . k V Ak ' '''''.
,,,) VIM:MIRY &&&&&& .-1•• •Ia •• ' - - !)/ ' i
1.1.01•en, . 1k.s r i : 64 •4 kVi.
r" la*Ill
_ L 7
,5t.ikta 1.41111.• Tana
• "! -1 4 41°
\\
,
— "04
Lgt.,
,t1
/ 1.74;11 cod*. ; g3r N et i s ,
• '14.-":111,•r• ' \ .•:s
444 \ - 1 . k■ i f l IV I3 '11:Lt
4 .1,140+.0;1?a,fter,44s
t ad . 4 !
,•
?;:' •iii9e
c _ t ; 141, 7-,;4"
4r-r) • • s
4;:t:Plz 7
it . tl
t'
J a " , - • tr.l' , .,
• — g.st sr.1 , . )•.s ii
., `
'..--. g" ------- -N • ,.. ,
, ' 4.:' .11
. r.b . ■4 /et • -. 1 ,
vAbg 'VP
akt.
itrA
.17 7.■ .1,11,.'t a • •
K■: t
t
• - N,'/:.715V3*-...*
f vere/Z6 6 — 2-cli‘?0•'
•
44.
SITE PLAN
1NTERLACHEN SOUTH
FOUR UNIT BUILDINGS
••••• so... nu.,
wale*
•
1 ,r_
-- . 0„ -- .1 , , , -- ,.. : -- -- 7 , - 7 - 71__ 7 ---
( _ •
( --- ) 1 - -- -k : - - 7 7 , - „ *.•;*1,.„ 1
\ ' _ . -''' ',,, ..
__\..:---(-: \t .. . ,_ ;i - :' ,. t.) IIT 7.:N\i::Thr ::;"*:\16;:,'..t.,,,,t‘.....:;1,,s,,:,:::'''''1/
---- ' 0: -+ r,___, / 1.,('■ , ,... - t:'' .
,,\\, //ce" '- '
• -1 ),1 . l ■ \-' \ , A
g
L,
(
North v•sor
rnuim1111.61.mr
/
•->
\Jr,
.•aae es-..
j
7. .7.
...... -',.
.s• ••• ***** ••••• war .111111.4
• ***** .2.644 ••••• •
•••••••4 11.11
O Oi fice
7625 Metro Blvd., Suite 145
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55435
(612) 835 -4126
O MIxiel
14788 Oak Run Lane
Burnsville, Minnesota 55337
(6:12) 892-1770
Re: STANDARD FEATURES - OAK RUN COUNTRYHOMES
General
Maintenance free home ownership:
- no snow shoveling
- no lawn care
- no painting, etc.
Convenient one level living featured in all designs
Convenient one level living and upstairs expansion space in the two -story plan
Every Oak Run Countryhome can be individually custom designed for your needs.
- -two to four bedrooms
-one to two baths
Outside
Fully landscaped and sodded yard
Standard patio /porch with wood railings
Brick entry pavers
Oversized double garage, attached
Security lighting: (entry, patio /porch and garage)
Inside
* Built-in appliances (Kenmore)
- Dishwasher # #14265
- Rangehood light /fan /151864
- Garbage disposal
Cast -iron tub (white) with tile surround and Designer water closet
Cast -iron porcelain sink (white)
Formica countertops with oak beveled edge and•backsplash
Hand textured ceilings
Hook -ups for washer and dryer
Oak cabinets in kitchen and bath
Wood windows with grids
No common wall, two separate walls between units with extra sound insulation
Standard flooring allowances for carpet and vinyl
Your choice of light fixtures
Ma :ty options to choose from
Standard princeton oak trim and oak doors
Energy
Forced air gas furnace
40 gallon gas hot water heater
Wood double glaze insulated windows
Insulated doors (at entry & garage)
Building design exceeds all energy code requirements
2 x 6 exterior walls
R -40 ceiling insualtion
R -19 exterior wall insulation
2/1/88
* Builder reserves the right to use other manufactuers of equal quality.
A development of fine carefree homes at Portland Avenue and Southcross Drive, Burnsville, Minnesota
= � / r u ..._ .....
I y C -� ♦.. 1..._..x...7 7
. .2
S.: : :::
r'
:
.......: ::.... . -....
tra
_.... : :E :::'
I
---'S
:i::i --s .:: 1..
,.7
t77
x—•
I
WATER TRUNK — 23.4 ACRES ....mil WATER LATERAL UPGRADE — 1168'
/ , •
r ..w . ............_. ... )_..
s �+....... ..... ? ....... ..r .:..:.:.: •.... te ...
• ..........
.. .::.. .......................... .............. -- ter
r ...._......a,>_.a
1
_..._ .......
1-
..r:;: . ?•••• ii:ili": 1 1 \-4. \
? i
L iv':7::::.:.L^ir.Y :^i::
._...
a;... { : :::::::: r.::c:
.. TI jiti: _
it:::::.::s. -...ii; ,
_.s... .. Sl :: .....
:r "tea:. _..
J.... r.. ..1... .. ... 7.
t..
t:
:S. _... _.... .i.t.
1 ....
x : .. :,. /,
n
.•.�, o.ve[ ��••�•... • Thomas Lake Wocd9
: : : : : :..... ....._
c
7
Locat?cn Map
,k -- -11
I �, ,4,•v V .J
Prolimina _.� t
ry Plat :° �• 2 � 8
�es.saatw+�..e�.��'�nr2"titas:� . xsur� !;vas.t�►�*c�:- «-�•ar+�rxnm
TH,9MA AK,E
J I .
•
'•••••••'‘ LATERAL.=B -I NEI=IT STORM SEWER - 460 FF ==
L . _ T.. ^ _' ^a C +•«,■■••••• c ,.^•n• +.r. Thomas Lake Woods
STORM SEWER TRUNK (MULTI) - 11.7 ACRES
Preliminary P'lt
STORM SEWER TRUNK (SINGLE FAMILY) - 15.6 ACRES
Locaticn Map
•1f
'rr
N
Ir.;_t 2 g
m+"'�li 9b:aitiwekr
MINUTES OF A CONTINUED MEETING - EAGAN ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION
EAGAN, MINNESOTA
MARCH 3, 1988
A continued meeting of the original meeting of February 25, 1988
of the Eagan Advisory Planning Commission was held on Thursday,
March 3, 1988 at 7:00 p.m. at the Eagan Municipal Center. Present
were Chairman Tim Pawlenty, Members Doris Wilkins, Lori Trygg, Ron
Voracek, Mark Miller, and Scott Merkley. Absent were members Gary
Graves and Daniel Garry. Also present were Assistant Planner Jim
Sturm, Assistant City Engineer Mike Foertsch and Assistant City
Attorney David Keller.
THOMAS LAKE WOODS - COMPREHENSIVE GUIDE AMENDMENT
PD AMENDMENT & PRELIMINARY PLAT
Chairman Pawlenty convened the meeting which was a continuation
of the February 25, 1988 meeting at which time three projects had
not been reviewed. The first public hearing was in regard to the
applications of Meritor Development Corporation for a Comprehensive
Guide Plan amendment, a Planned Development amendment (rezoning)
from R -4 (Multiple), PF (Public Facilities) and R -3 (Townhouse), to
R -3 and R -1 (Single Family), and a preliminary plat consisting of 60
townhouse units and 27 single family lots on 39.3 acres within the
Blackhawk Park Planned Development located west of Thomas Lake Road
and south of the NSP easement in the southwest quarter of Section
28. Mr. Sturm introduced the project providing description of the
location and configuration of the R -1 and R -3 lots, resulting in a
density of 1.2 units per acre in the R -1 area, and 3.5 units per
acre in the R -3 area. He noted that six of the R -3 lots were below
the 6,000 square foot requirement, but that in staff's opinion, the
reduction was not significant in that it could be corrected through
lot line adjustment, if necessary, and in effect, all common areas
and yards were to be maintained by a Homeowner's Association anyway.
Mr. Larry Frank was present on behalf of the developer and
presented a quick review . of the site plan indicating that the
original PD had provided for 220 units of apartments. He described
several restraints upon the development of the area, including a
Northern Natural Gas line easement, a Williams Brothers Pipeline
easement, a pond area, the extension of the existing street from the
west, and the general business area immediately to the south.
Representatives of Oak Run were present to provide details of
the townhome units that were being proposed.
March 3, 1988
Mr. Tony Bauer, a resident of Mallard Drive, expressed concern
in regard to traffic on Mallard Drive to the residential area to the
west towards Johnny Cake Ridge Road. He also questioned the value
of the homes which the developer indicated would be approximately
$150,000.00 for the single family. Mr. Bauer also pointed out that
one of the existing single family homes on Mallard Drive would have
a side lot shared with a townhome.
Mr. Bryan Fredrickson, also of Mallard Drive, to the west of the
proposal, expressed concern regarding small children and traffic
hazards.
Mr. Dick Smith of Thomas Lake Road expressed concern that the
exits from Thomas Lake Road to Diffley and Cliff Roads are already
disastrous and additional traffic would be a problem.
Mr. Foertsch advised that Johnny Cake Ridge Road and Diffley
Road were both due to be upgraded in 1988. It was anticipated that
Clemson Drive would also connect from Thomas Lake Road to the new
Johnny Cake Ridge Road.
Member Voracek questioned the capacity for the City street in
this area, which Mr. Foertsch advised would be more than adequate.
Mr. Voracek also asked that the developer warn home buyers of the
existence of the pipelines, which the developer agreed to do.
In response to member Trygg's question, a representative of Oak
Run indicated that the townhomes would cost from $85,000.00 to
$150,000.00, depending on whether the second level or basement were
added to the unit. She also advised that the target market was
middle aged to older professionals.
Mr. Frank, in response to Chairman Pawlenty, indicated that the
values of the single family homes would be $110,000.00 to
$160,000.00.
Jim Sturm advised that not allowing a through street would
result in a cul-de-sac with 87 units accessing thereon. He also
suggested that the proposed road alignment made sense in light of
the grading plan an3 existing and proposed ponds.
Mr. Merkley pointed out that it is not possible for every
resident to live on a cul -de -sac and that it was clear that City
plans had always intended that Mallard Drive would be a through
street as evidenced by the existing signage on the end of Mallard
Drive.
Member Trygg pointed out that Clemson Drive would provide a
similar type of through- street and did not agree that it would
create a significant amount of traffic. Mr. Frank advised Member
Miller that the residential lot adjacent to the townhome on the west
be approximately 60 to 70 feet from building to building. In
APC Minutes
`March 3, 1988
response to member Wilkins' concerns, Mr. Frank described the
pedestrian pathway to the High Line Trail and the corner area
anticipated for park use.
In regard to pedestrian traffic and vehicular traffic, Mr.
Foertsch suggested that while the street was designed for 300 to
1,000 average trips per day, anticipated traffic would probably be
about 400 ADTs.
Trygg moved, Wilkins seconded the motion to recommend approval
of the rezoning as an appropriate down- zoning of this property in
light of the surrounding uses. All voted yes.
Member Trygg moved, Wilkins seconded the motion to recommend
approval of Comprehensive Guide Plan amendment. All voted yea.
Trygg moved, Merkley seconded the motion to recommend approval
of the preliminary plat, subject to the following conditions:
1. This development shall accept its additional assessment
obligations as defined in the staff's report in accordance with the
final plat dimensions and the rates in effect at the time of final
plat approval.
2. This development shall dedicate 10 foot drainage and utility
easements centered over all common lot lines and adjacent to private
property or public right -of -way.
3. This development shall dedicate, provide, or financially
guarantee its proportionate share of the acquisition costs of
additional drainage, ponding, and utility easements as required by
the alignment, depth, and storage capacity of all required public
utilities and streets located beyond the boundaries of this plat or
outside of dedicated public right -of -way as necessary to service
this development.
4. This development shall dedicate all public right -of -way and
temperary slope easements for ultimate development of adjacent
roadways as required by the appropriate jurisdictional agency.
5. This development shall dedicate adequate drainage and
ponding easements to incorporate the required high water elevation
necessitated by City storm water storage volume requirements.
6. All public streets and utilities necessary to provide
service to this development shall be designed by a registered
professional engineer in accordance with City codes and engineering
standards and policies, and approved by staff prior to final plat
approval.
30■1
APC Minutes
'March 3, 1988
7. A detailed grading, drainage, erosion, and sediment control
plan must be prepared in accordance with current City standards and
approved by staff prior to final plat approval.
8. A detailed landscape plan shall be submitted on the proposed
grading plan and approved by staff prior to the final plat approval.
The financial guarantee shall be included in the Development
Contract and not released until one year after the date of
installation.
9. All internal public and private streets shall be constructed
within the required right -of -way in accordance with City design
standards.
10. If any public improvements are to be installed under a City
contract, the appropriate project must be approved by Council action
prior to final plat approval.
11. This development shall be responsible for the acquisition
of all regulatory agency permits in the time frame required by the
affected agency. •
12. The developer shall provide notice to each potential buyer
of the existence of the Northern Natural Gas and Williams Brothers
Pipelines.
All voted in favor.
` RAHN RIDGE 2ND ADDITION - COMPREHENSIVE GUIDE PLAN AMENDMENT
PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AMENDMENT (REZONING) & PRELIMINARY -PLAT
The appli of Rahn Ridge Associates fora Comprehensive
Guide Plan Amendment, a planned development,,.aniendment (rezoning)
from LB (Limited Business) to R -3 (Townhousey within the Mission
Fills PD, and a preliminary plat for 28 townhouse units on 3.43
acres located west of Rahn Road ,arid south of Rahn Way, in the
northeast quarter of Section 31, were the objects of the second
public hearing of the evening convene. by Chairman Pawlenty. Mr.
Sturm described the applications and the ,location of the 28
owner /occupied townhomes in an area described as an outlot of Rahn
Cliff 1st Addition, immediately east of the church in an area
designated LB in both the zoning plan and comprehensive guide plan.
He noted that tfie Western Court Facility was immediately to the
north, and AstLeford commercial properties were located to the east.
The Ridgecl,iff and Vienna duplexes were located just south, in
addition a City park.
4ck
MEMORANDUM
TO: TOM HEDGES, CITY ADMINISTRATOR
FROM: KEN VRAA, DIRECTOR OF PARKS AND RECREATION
DATE: MARCH 30, 1988
RE: THOMAS LAKE WOODS ADDITION - ADVISORY PARKS AND
RECREATION COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION
At the Thursday, March 3, 1988 Advisory Parks and Recreation
Commission meeting, the Advisory Commission reviewed the proposed
Thomas Lake Woods Addition.
Although the developer has fulfilled the parks dedication for
this property he has agreed to donate Outlot B for park purposes.
The developer will also donate Outlot C with the provision that
he will do the grading work if the City will construct a trail
link through Outlot C from the northwest cul -de -sac to the
Highline Corridor.
The Advisory Parks and Recreation Commission has recommended to
the City Council the following:
1. That Outlot B be accepted as a donation for Willmus
Park and that Outlot C also be accepted with the
following provision:
a. Developer to be responsible for the grading,
(working with the City to determine the
appropriate measures to maintain consistent
quality) and the City to be. responsible for the
trail surface.
b. Developer to include an 8 foot bituminous trail
link on the west side of Thomas Lake Road.
Agenda Information Memo
April 5, 1988, City Council Meeting
PRELIMINARY PLAT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
TOWN CENTRE 70 - 9TH ADDITION
C. Preliminary Plat, Federal Land Company, Town Centre 70 - 9th
Addition, Consisting of 4.3 Acres Including one (.81) Acre Lot
for a Pizza Hut Restaurant and a Conditional Use Permit for a
Pylon Sign East of I -35E and West Town Centre Drive - -A public
hearing was held by the Advisory Planning Commission at their
March 3 meeting, an extension of the February 25 APC /Commission
meeting, to consider a preliminary plat application submitted by
Federal Land Company for Town Centre 70 - 9th Addition consisting
of 4.3 acres including one (.81) acre lot for Pizza Hut
Restaurant and a conditional use permit, pylon sign east of
I -35E and west of Town Centre Drive. The APC is recommending
approval of both applications.
At the March 3 meeting, this item was continued and staff was
directed to review three (3) issues: 1) look at potential
problems of the access point from Town Centre Drive, especially
with the entrance to the shopping center to the east; 2) research
the Town Centre 70 sign agreement and its impact for the pylon
sign for Pizza Hut, those major identification signs for the
shopping center and the total number of signs west of Town Centre
Drive; and 3) work with the developer to create a landscape plan
more consistant with the City's landscape policy requirements,
placing special emphasis on achieving a quality freeway quarter
image. All three issues were reviewed by the Planning staff and
for a copy of that response, refer to pages a S_ through 9(0 .
Also enclosed for City Council review is a copy of the Planning
and Engineering Departments report found on pages G7 through
For a copy of the APC action, refer to page(s)I()24-4
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the
preliminary plat entitled Town Centre 70 - 9th Addition and a
conditional use permit for a pylon sign.
MEMO TO: DALE C RUNKLE, CITY PLANNER
FROM: JIM STURM, PLANNER I /LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT
DATE: MARCH 14, 1988
SUBJECT: TOWN CENTRE 70 9TH ADDITION
At the March 3 extension of the February 25 Advisory Planning Commission
meeting, this item was continued and staff was directed to:
1. look at potential problems of the access point from Town Centre Drive,
especially with the entrance to the shopping center to the east;
2. research the Town Centre 70 sign agreement and its impact on the pylon
sign for Pizza Hut, the proposed major identification sign for the
shopping center, and the total number of signs west of Town Centre Drive;
3. work with the developer to create a landscape plan more consistent with
the City's landscape policy requirements, placing special emphasis on
achieving a quality freeway corridor image;
Since then, staff has met with representatives from Federal Land Company to
discuss these issues. As far as the access issue goes, the developer feels
that this site plan is acceptable and does not wish to make any modifications.
Staff does not believe that it is the very best design solution, but it is
acceptable since Town Centre Drive is a four -lane road.
The terms of the sign agreement have been met as long as the major
identification sign receives a separate Conditional Use Permit due to its
height and signage area square footage. No more than seven pylons will be
allowed west of Town Centre Drive, including the major identification sign if
approved.
The landscaping was significantly improved. The previous plan proposed ten
trees with none between the freeway and parking area. This was increased to
thirty -two total trees with fourteen along Highway 35E. The variety of plant
material selected is more consistent with adjacent plantings and it is now
anticipated that the perimeter landscaping from the auto mall to the Pizza Hut
will flow together easier since both ends have been completed. A more uniform
overall design theme along the highway and Town Centre Drive will now be
possible - -- similar to the way the fast food restaurants to the north
developed.
JS /mc
CITY OF EAGAN
SUBJECT: PRELIMINARY PLAT, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
(TOWN CENTRE 70, 9TH ADDITION)
APPLICANT: FEDERAL LAND COMPANY
LOCATION: NW 1/4, SECTION 15
EXISTING ZONING: CSC (COMMUNITY SHOPPING CENTER)
DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: FEBRUARY 25, 1988
DATE OF REPORT: FEBRUARY 17, 1988
REPORTED BY: PLANNING AND ENGINEERING DEPARTMENTS
APPLICATIONS: An application has been submitted requesting a
Preliminary Plat for the Town Centre 70 9th Addition. This .81-
acre plat is located south of the northbound entry onto
Highway 35E and west of Town Centre Drive. A separate
Conditional Use Permit will be necessary to allow a pylon sign
for a Pizza Hut Restaurant.
SITE PLAN: Currently, this site (a portion of Outlot B of the
Town Centre 70 1st Addition) is open, flat grassland. Other than
the Auto Mall to the south, there has not been any development on
the west side of Town Centre Drive. Staff is concerned that
without an overall plan for that area; traffic and safety
problems may arise. A similar situation occurred with the four
fast food restaurants on the north side of Town Centre Drive
where the original concept plan had three lots.
This proposal would plat the .81 -acre lot and the remaining
3.5 acres as Outlot A of the 9th Addition. The restaurant would
seat one hundred people and require thirty -three parking stalls.
Forty ten - foot -wide stalls have been provided. The building will
be constructed of masonry and brick; very similar to the facility
on Lake Street in Minneapolis. All Code setback /coverage
requirements have been adhered to.
The parking lot sits on a plateau above Highway 35E and the
landscaping on that property line should screen the cars. Staff
requested that a revised plan be submitted that reflected the
City's concern of the freeway corridor image and was consistent
with other commercial developments. No revised plan was
submitted for staff review.
The proposed 27' -tall (116 SF per side) pylon sign along Town
Centre Drive requires a Conditional Use Permit because it is not
in the location that was previously approved with the Town Centre
Sign Agreement. Federal Land Company has submitted another
Conditional Use Permit for a major identification sign describing
the shopping center that would be located along the northwest
corner of the lot where the Pizza Hut pylon was intended to be.
q �
That item will be scheduled for the March Advisory Planning
Commission meeting. As proposed, those signs will also require a
Variance since they cannot be 300' from each other.
GRADING /DRAINAGE /EROSION CONTROL: The proposed site was
previously graded as a part of the Town Centre development.
Minimal site grading is required for site development and site
drainage is planned to be intercepted internally and conveyed by
storm sewer to the existing storm sewer in Town Centre Drive.
The existing storm sewer in Town Centre Drive is of sufficient
capacity to handle the runoff generated by the site development.
Storm water from this site ultimately discharges into LeMay Lake.
Erosion control measures are required to limit the sediment
leaving the site through the storm sewer system. It is important
that all erosion control measures are properly installed and
maintained throughout the construction period. A revised
erosion /sediment control plan addressing additional items such as
inlet protection around storm sewer catch basins, detail of
construction entrance pad, and a contact person identified on the
site plan in the event a maintenance concern arises are required.
UTILITIES: Sanitary sewer of sufficient depth and capacity to
serve this site is readily available in Town Centre Drive. The
development proposes to connect the sanitary sewer service
directly into the existing sanitary manhole in Town Centre Drive.
The sanitary sewer service will be required to be connected
directly into the sanitary sewer line. No direct connection to
the existing sanitary manhole will be allowed.
Water main service of sufficient capacity and pressure is readily
available in Town Centre Drive. The development proposes to take
its water service from this existing water main. Sufficient fire
hydrant protection was provided as a part of the Town Centre
development.
STREETS /ACCESS /CIRCULATION: Access to this site is taken
directly from Town Centre Drive. The proposed 24' wide entrance
driveway is required" to be upgraded to a 30' wide entrance.
Ingress and egress to this site is proposed in a single location.
EASEMENTS /RIGHTS -OF- WAY /PERMITS: Sufficient right -of -way for
Tcwn Centre Drive was provided with the platting of the Town
Centre development.
All regulatory agency permits shall be acquired within the
appropriate time frame as required by the affected agency.
ASSESSMENTS: In accordance with the special assessment policies
in effect at the time of the platting of the Town Centre 70
Addition, the proposed parcel has been assessed for sanitary
sewer trunk, water trunk and water availability charge under
Project #58 and storm sewer trunk under Project #429.
0\,)
The pending assessment of record are identified as follows:
PROJ # DESCRIPTION RATE QTY AMT
443 Storm Sewer Esmt. $5,910 /ac 4.3289 ac $25,412
519 Street Lights 4,021
TOTAL PENDING ASSESSMENTS OF RECORD $29,433
In accordance with Special Assessment Policies in effect at this
time, the following assessments are proposed as a condition of
Final Plat approval:
PROJ # DESCRIPTION
429 Storm Sewer Lateral $2,458/ac .75 ac $ 1,843
The proposed assessment reflects a change in the City's Special
Assessment Policy. In the past, lateral assessments were based
on the construction of laterals to the properties boundary rather
than to the City's trunk system. The current policy is to base
the lateral assessment on the cost to reach the trunk system.
The proposed assessment is the prorated share of the total cost
of the Town Centre development's storm sewer lateral connection
to the City trunk system.
All final assessment obligations will be calculated based on the
quantities and dimensions of the Final Plat and in accordance
with the rates in effect at the time of the Final Plat approval.
CONDITIONS:
1. These standard conditions of plat approval as adopted by
Council action on September 15, 1987 shall be complied with:
Al, B1, C2, C4, El, and Gl.
2. No direct connection into the existing sanitary manhole
located in Town Centre Drive will be allowed.
3.
RATE
The Pizza Hut pylon sign shall be located along Town Centre
Road and be subject to the one -time fee of $2.50 per square
foot.
QTY AMT
STANDARD CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL
A. Assessments
1. This development shall accept its additional assessment
obligations as defined in the staff's report in
accordance with the final plat dimensions and the rates
in effect at the time of final plat approval.
B. Easements and Rights -of -Way
1. This development shall dedicate 10' drainage and utility
easements centered over all common lot lines and adjacent
to private property or public right -of -way.
2. This development shall dedicate, provide, or financially
guarantee its proportionate share of the acquisition
costs of additional drainage, ponding, and utility
easements as required by the alignment, depth, and
storage capacity of all required public utilities and
streets located beyond the boundaries of this plat or
outside of dedicated public right -of -way as necessary to
service this development.
3. This development shall dedicate all public right -of -way
and temporary slope easements for ultimate development of
adjacent roadways as required by the appropriate
jurisdictional agency.
4. This development shall dedicate adequate drainage and
ponding easements to incorporate the required high water
elevation necessitated by City storm water storage volume
requirements.
C. Plans and Specifications
1. All public streets and utilities necessary to provide
service to this development shall be designed by a
registered professional engineer in accordance with City
codes and engineering standards and policies, and
approved by staff prior to final plat approval.
2. A detailed grading, drainage, erosion, and sediment
control plan must be prepared in accordance with current
City standards and approved by staff prior to final plat
approval.
3. This development shall insure that all temporary dead end
public streets shall have a cul -de -sac constructed in
accordance with City engineering standards.
4. A detailed landscape plan shall be submitted on the
proposed grading plan and approved by staff prior to the
final plat approval. The financial guarantee shall be
included in the Development Contract and not released
until one year after the date of installation.
(0o
STANDARD CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL
PAGE TWO
5. All internal public and private streets shall be
constructed within the required right -of -way in
accordance with City design standards.
D. Public Improvements
1. If any public improvements are to be installed under a
City contract, the appropriate project must be approved
by Council action prior to final plat approval.
E. Permits
1. This development shall be responsible for the acquisition
of all regulatory agency permits in the time frame
required by the affected agency.
F. Parks Dedication
1. This development shall fulfull its parks dedication
requirements as recommended by the Advisory Parks and
Recreation Commission and approved by Council action.
G. Other
Approved:
Revised:
1. All standard platting and zoning conditions shall be
adhered to unless specifically granted a variance by
Council action.
LTS #2
STANDARD
Advisory Planning Commission City Council
August 25, 1987 September 15, 1987
1 o
2 7 .—
' • t -^" • ;
/ • • -
i
% 1 - '''''' • • ,1 - ' , ` -----'3.7. \ \ ':- '':' \ ,
\ `''.' \,., 1 \ -,11 ,-_•,..-- .
,,
k,... ,.-.C.- ----- ___,L.--- c t,,I0..:.---- -- `
I / ---r --., N_A --
,.......,----
, pA
f:!
\ -x i1A-5 GOL F
\_
• ". ':,','..---,. ,,
,, ,c....„ .. , .....,, ..-.- . \-
, . . ,,..' •••,•
,:.,.: ..,;%„..--..,..---".,-
•
•
. • .1 i. •,:-. , - .' ,,-'.... ,
' - - ' 1 - 4 " - ..,':•-",‘ ;,' ' '‘'.! , ‘... 'R . -
‘‘,
V ,Y . , -:; t ,, , .. \ ■,■, ,- .._:„.--...
4 ,.--, 4 , 4 , ,:_t'4,
■ , • — ■ t i % .. t .. •
• .1 ` - •- ... .,...4 ■- „....., ...... ,--- X, ,‘
.. \'''' ; ;■S C:..': '• ‘ ; ; -• .r.: ii .'"-
\
—... : Y -- '+ ' '' . :.\ 0 . \\
--.*
.. ■ .
r
■ ■,,,,,.......„
00 )..
--,... / ...., .-..-:s.:--
..1 4
--.1,...
1 rr ---•
.---,--,--, ' c
PI 402.
0
(
1
I
t„„
ttt{tt
h.
ilroTZM
1
111
•
4 w
a
L
i1
• III
t .�
Wt.
z
tl
W
a
w
V
z
0
J
w
t
to
0
w
t-
w
<
w
a
Z
Ez�
• _ _ . . 4
Ji
1211 i
: 1
1! is i 7 13 :
HOW 3a
:I I - `' 3 I 11
11 !9
. . in . it ►
L ,_
.. .4 4 r . . . 4
L
�qr
t.
•
n
V LOS3t{Nw 'NYDY3
3Nt1O SMiH30 NMOL
1NVUf1ViS32T 111H VZZ1d 03SOd0U3d
V_ _
1 •
O
I/
/`
/ 1
r•
1
. 'i..
i ...X ?,
1 .21s
1i.,_
Sp
.44.. "us
1 •WQN fir311111109
k � i 2: dp ft.
k Hi 3 } ¢ s
[ YUJVN 11011111103
fit F N
7 i V f'
I •ao
NNE t a, r
_ e + = N N
M�
• _ _ . . 4
Ji
1211 i
: 1
1! is i 7 13 :
HOW 3a
:I I - `' 3 I 11
11 !9
. . in . it ►
L ,_
.. .4 4 r . . . 4
L
�qr
t.
•
n
V LOS3t{Nw 'NYDY3
3Nt1O SMiH30 NMOL
1NVUf1ViS32T 111H VZZ1d 03SOd0U3d
V_ _
1 •
O
I/
/`
/ 1
r•
1
• /
/
•
'cc
■
4 t2
4
8
A.
'
,
0 7
a
.-...)
4)
r _ v / I)C
N 1-1)
4 Li
- 1 .10° • .
• ta,,
•
3_
a
!• .'71
C-t i
• CP-
• 150
7/, 7
1 , •.i N.l::�,i irl
I
Ii I I
CP2=
823.5
829.7
CP - 12
826.5
829.6
27
.3
4 CP II
BP-29
9097
81110
• I I.!!..1! :.
11 s BP-986 033
• r • - 895.2
1 city of eagan
PUBLIC
• WORKS
DEPARTMENT
CP -3
P41 9
8305
G1:
F0( I'A
ft 1, ,1•
•.... .: RgCGC 1I �-^-
1
1 / . BP-3
L
•,1 "jl 8P 135 .. _ 1 _ 903_2_
�l � - p , 1 / J
920.2 �
i
BP -25 BP-4
L.S. - 4
fffft JP 13440
808.1 3
1 .0 � ' / 884'
.., .0'1 - ` {,. BOB./ , B44 JP - n .
85/ 5 "! ! j
STORM SEWER
MASTER PLAN
I I i
:6"; - tir
i
` ; i1 •'1 `!
, . VI
8 . j-.
CP -4 I r'• ' OP-'.14 67/ 7 :
- ,2 7 7 i :' ( .� 8 �'- I�� - - -- - - --
6 . \�' ...
1 . L .1/ , D OP - 13
k / DP- 27..___ .667.15 i�
875.9
}'/DP -
5 4
1 DP -4
11 F374 , ° R L.5. - 7 --
D
3C .- C - h
•
.I � . . , . = j 010 �,'•�.
8 ^ 50 f,
- _ ' I ' ' 1 ' 1 • , 930
829.7 _ - I j._._ , � �� D -c am 897 0 �
r,1, J P -664 VI DP-2 •
1
13 P - 1
7003
80/0
M CP -5 . f,
,730.' L
i -67
1 971.0
- 880.0 •
I'
SUBJECT PARCEL
8746 DP_61
fl T I O
6780
8575'(1' '
866 5L i,l v
OP - 7: -
182.,..1
!.•',34.2i i
1 )n' ,
- 971 0 N...., •"2•2 7 1 ' • - ' -'
8 60 0 . ,, • y ••"•'-• �^- ••..s', . ', - G ' 5
. OP
Cc et' . ' J -d.' �
.,.� 8720 .,.
JP -65 ( 7 JP -4 '
888 � 8 '•-• , R94
, 1 JP-62(�1 ?•
9930.
8055
\
z
i! I
• D P -19 I
6300 ' OP -3 � 1
'
' .8690
6 /2 ti
'JP •47
849 2 J
851 3 16'
1 II ,.,
JP-15
1 ,440
- 24 46
JP -4 t
-: L.50
z4' • P44 0
696.5 .`-
JP -5 I•l 1.. .r...rr•.
\ - - •/ I 634.0 1• --- --
27 -''` , i K I l,2LL 1
PP. 1 I • • 792 :3 1 1 , , . 1
80/.0 I
1 �
it 5
e . ,. -.�' I! -- -
JP
ci 9 b y , " - JP-49
O Y I ';1•,v1-,A1_C 1 1- 8
j JP -
d 70 6 •
8 0 U
: JP-351 JP-7. 1
87 ?.
3s' f ., � 969.41 .85 ) „
1
J ,;" I �� 8872.9 8652 1�
JP -37JP 4 JP ..r
8'5 N:)(35' 12' x ;' - 8 19.
, 1.41 1( '" 630.01 . ..,.h
``� ./ 1 � - _ . - --
1
JP -II
81 5 7_
approved:
JP - 63U
0997
- 9007
JP - 44
,90 7
9 T 895,7
1
L.
3/ • \
• IJ -1 7
d
FIG. #1
standard
plate 4:
MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING - EAGAN ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION
EAGAN, MINNESOTA
MARCH 22, 1988
A regular meeting of the Eagan Advisory Planning Commission was
held on Tuesday, March 22, 1988 at 7:00 p.m. at the Eagan Municipal
Center. Present were Chairman Pawlenty, Members Garry, Voracek,
Trygg, Miller and Merkley. Absent were members Graves and Wilkins.
Also present were City Engineer Thomas Colbert, City Planner Dale
Runkle, Assistant Planner Jim Sturm, and Assistant City Attorney
David Keller.
AGENDA
Mr. Runkle pointed out that the planned development amendment
for the O'Neil property should be continued, as the Stipulation in
the legal action had not been entered into at this time. Garry
moved, Trygg seconded the motion to approve the agenda, deleting
item G under New Business, O'Neil Planned Development Amendment.
All voted affirmatively.
MINUTES
Voracek moved, Merkley seconded the motion to approve the
minutes of the regular Advisory Planning Commission regular meetings
of February 25, 1988 and March 3, 1988 as presented. All voted yes.
TOWN CENTRE 9TH ADDITION - PRELIMINARY PLAT
& CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
The first public hearing of the evening was convened by Chairman
Pawlenty in regard to the applications of Federal Land Company for a
preliminary plat consisting of 4.3 acres including one (.81) acre
lct for a Pizza Hut Restaurant, and a conditional use permit for a
pylon sign located adjacent to Town Centre Drive in the northwest
quarter of Section 15. Mr. Sturm introduced the project indicating
that this item had been continued from the last Planning Commission
meeting with direction from the Planning Commission to staff and the
developer to resolve the issues regarding access drive, sign
agreement, and landscaping. Mr. Sturm indicated that the access
drive was not the best possible alignment, but that it was
acceptable in light of the 4 -lane construction of Town Centre Drive.
He pointed out that the proposed sign complied with the Sign
Agreement and the second sign could be allowed as the Sign Agreement
provided for one variance in this area. The landscaping had been
significantly and substantially increased pursuant to discussions
with staff.
APC Minutes
March 22, 1988
Mr. Charles Bartholdi was present on behalf of the developer and
indicated that Mr. David Kirscht, the landscape architect, had
provided the landscaping including screening along the freeway. He
advised that the access proposed maximized the distance from the
shopping center entrance.
Mr. William Trustier of Pizza Hut and Mr. Martin Colon were also
present. In response to Mr. Voracek, Mr. Sturm indicated that the
center lines of the two access drives on the opposite sides of Town
Centre Drive were approximately 125 feet apart, meeting City Code.
Voracek moved, Garry seconded the motion to recommend approval
of the preliminary plat, subject to the following conditions:
1. This development shall accept its additional assessment
obligations as defined in the staff's report in accordance with the
final plat dimensions and the rates in effect at the time of final
plat approval.
2. This development shall dedicate 10 foot drainage and utility
easements centered over all common lot lines and adjacent to private
property or public right -of -way.
3. A detailed grading, drainage, erosion, and sediment control
plan must be prepared in accordance with current City standards and
approved by staff prior to final plat approval.
4. A detailed landscape plan shall be submitted on the proposed
grading plan and approved by staff prior to the final plat approval.
The financial guarantee shall be included in the Development
Contract and not released until one year after the date of
installation.
5. This development shall be responsible for the acquisition of
all regulatory agency permits in the time frame required by the
affected agency.
6. All standard platting,and zoning conditions shall be adhered
to unless specifically granted a variance by Council action.
7. No direct connection into the existing sanitary manhole
located in Town Centre Drive will be allowed.
8. The Pizza Hut pylon sign shall be located along Town Centre
Road and be subject to the one -time fee of $2.50 per square foot.
All voted aye.
Voracek moved, Garry seconded the motion to recommend approval
of the conditional use permit for a pylon sign. All voted yes.
Agenda Information Memo
April 5, 1988, City Council Meeting
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT /FEDERAL LAND COMPANY
D. Conditional Use Permit for Federal Land Company to Allow a 35
:Foot Tall Pylon Sign for Town Centre Shopping Center Described as
Outlot B of Town Centre 70 1st Addition - -A public hearing was
held by the Advisory Planning Commission at their last regular
meeting held on March 22, 1988 to consider an application
submitted by Federal Land Company requesting a conditional use
permit to allow a pylon sign adjacent to I -35E, south of the
northbound entrance from Yankee Doodle Road. The APC is
recommending approval of this item.
For a copy of the report as prepared by the Planning Division of
Community Development, refer to pages /(/ through / /Z.
For a copy of the APC minutes on this item, refer to page(s)
// ).
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the
conditional use permit for a 35 foot tall pylon sign for Town
Centre Shopping Center as presented.
•t
CITY OF EAGAN
SUBJECT: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (PYLON SIGN)
APPLICANT: FEDERAL LAND COMPANY
LOCATION: OUTLOT B, TOWN CENTRE 70 1ST ADDITION
EXISTING ZONING: CSC (COMMUNITY SHOPPING CENTER)
DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: MARCH 22, 1988
DATE OF REPORT: MARCH 14, 1988
REPORTED BY: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPT (PLANNING DIV)
APPLICATION SUMMARY: An application has been submitted requesting a
Conditional Use Permit to allow a pylon sign adjacent to Hwy. 35 just south of
the northbound entrance from Yankee Doodle Road. This location is in
conformance with the terms of the Town Centre sign agreement even though the
spacing to the proposed Pizza Hut pylon on this pending lot (Lot 2, Town
Centre 70 9th Addition) is less than 300' as code requires for pylons on the
same side of the street. The sign agreement permitted this deviation from
street code spacing by allowing for one variance in this area. The maximum
amount of pylons south of the entrance ramp and west of Town Centre Drive will
be seven (7) including this sign.
The proposed four sided interior lighted sign would be 35' tall and contain
approximately 160 s.f. of signage area per side (the square portion near the
top third of the pylon). Since this sign is for a major complex, the "Council
shall determine the maximum size after reviewing the applicable conditions
including terrain, safety factors, etc." (Code Chapter 4, Sub. 6 -C).
If approved, this Conditional Use Permit shall be subject to:
1) The one time sign fee of $2.50 per square foot for all 4 sides
2) The maximum height /size shall be determined or approved by the Council.
•LA.19 C /Va_
1 T'••
N v.f
410.fr
•
r.µ
...•..•.
?'' SCIa•
1 _ '
I
t.
cr=
r.w+ca Ms.'
-•••••••••11. Tw
-.► ux uva—
•+••• . i_-
-aec .•.c
• H'c••••‘•sW
p
' I �
Yi I —mss
I
2
i..J A• -, T.'I
:I..
—1
FOUR SIDED ILLUMINATED SIGN PANEL
EVEAL PANTED BLUE
IARK BRONZE METAL BASE AND TOP —
APC Minutes
March 22, 1988
OUTLOT B, TOWN CENTRE 70 1ST ADDITION - FEDERAL LAND COMPANY
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (SHOPPING CENTER SIGN)
The second public hearing of the .evening was called in regard to
the application of Federal Land Company for a 35 foot tall pylon
sign for the Town Centre Shopping Center located on Outlot B of the
Town Centre 70 1st Addition west of Town Centre Road, along I -35E in
the northwest quarter of Section 15. Mr. Sturm described the major
complex sign which was to be located on the west side of the Pizza
Hut lot. He indicated that City Code does allow a variance from
height and size requirements for major complex or shopping center
signs.
Mr. Charles Bartholdi was present on behalf of the applicant and
indicated that this was a major complex sign, one of seven, allowed
within the Sign Agreement, noting that one sign had been used for
the Car Care Center, one for the Pizza Hut, and the proposed sign
leaving 4 signs available per the Agreement, west of Town Centre
Drive. He described the sign as compatible with the Shopping Center
and approximately 160 square feet in size with open viewing through
the bottom.
Mr. Colon advised Mr. Voracek that the pole with the red flag
last winter was a test as to the visibility of the proposed sign
from I -35E and other locations. He stated that it would be possible
to see the sign approximately one -half mile north on I -35E, allowing
traffic to access in time onto Yankee Doodle Road. He indicated
that the sign would not be seen from South I -35E until passing under
Pilot Knob Road.
Merkley moved, Voracek seconded the motion to recommend approval
of the conditional use permit, subject to the following conditions:
1. The one -time sign fee of $2.50 per square foot for all four
sides.
2. The maximum height /size shall be determined or approved by
the Council.
All voted yes.
THE DAN BAR COMPANY - CONDITIONAL USE PER I�
Chairman Paw' t then convened the Qubl he ra ing in regard to
the application of Bar Companyy - conditional use permit to
allow an on -site residence fo < m - ini- storage facility located on
Lot 6, Block 2, Sibley Texminal�- ,I,ndustrial Park located west of
Highway #13 in the southeast quarter --of Section 8. Mr. Sturm
advised that the_- application was strictly - -,in regard to the
residential use that the property was already platted and zoned
Agenda Information Memo
April 5, 1988, City Council Meeting
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT /DAN BAR COMPANY FOR MINI STORAGE
E. Conditional Use Permit for Dan Bar Company, to Allow On -Site
Residence for a Mini - Storage Facility - -A public hearing was held
by the Advisory Planning Commission at their last regular meeting
held on March 22, 1988, to consider an application submitted by
the Dan Bar Company requesting a conditional use permit to allow
a mini - storage facility on Lot 6, Block 2 of the Sibley Terminal
Industrial Park. The APC is recommending approval of this item.
For a copy of the report prepared by the Community Development
Department /Planning Division, refer to pages WS through \al.
For a copy of the action that was taken by t e APC, refer to
those minutes found on page(s) La- through 3 .
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the
conditional use permit for Dan Bar to allow on site residence for
a mini - storage facility.
CITY OF EAGAN
SUBJECT: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
APPLICANT: THE DAN BAR COMPANY
LOCATION: LOT 6, BLOCK 2, SIBLEY TERMINAL INDUSTRIAL PARK
EXISTING ZONING: LI (LIGHT INDUSTRIAL)
DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: MARCH 22, 1988
DATE OF REPORT: MARCH 14, 1988
REPORTED BY: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPT (PLANNING DIV)
APPLICATION SUMMARY: An application has been submitted requesting a
Conditional Use Permit to allow a mini - storage facility on Lot 6, Block 2 of
the Sibley Terminal Industrial Park. This lot with frontage on both Terminal
Drive and Hwy. 13 is located approximately 1/4 mile north of Yankee Doodle
Road. Storage facilities are permitted uses within LI districts however, the
on -site residence for the manager does require a Conditional Use Permit.
SITE PLAN /CODE CONFORMANCE: The proposed building has a footprint of 71,775
s.f. and will have four floors totaling 287,100 s.f. This is below the
300,000 s.f. total that would initiate the Environmental Assessment Worksheet
(EAW). The lot coverage is 35% in a 35% district. All setbacks meet code
requirements and the height will be below the 40' allowed in LI districts.
The building will be constructed in a single phase with a covered access ramp
on the north side of the building that enters each level much the same as a
parking ramp. However, no parking or storage is being proposed on top of the
building since the grades fall 40' -50' from Hwy. 13 and the top of the
structure will be close to the street elevation.
A landscape plan will be prepared along with the typical engineering drawings
at the building permit stage. Staff does not foresee any problems since the
applicant has reviewed the project on an informal basis with representatives
from the Community Development Department, Planning and Inspections Division
and the Engineering Department. Since the site is a platted lot, this is the
normal process.
As proposed, this building would be one of the largest (if not the largest)
storage facilities in Minnesota and the only one with a totally enclosed,
multi -story design. The exterior will consist of concrete with horizontal
metal bands that will allow air to circulate through the building.
If approved, this Conditional Use Permit shall be subject to:
1) No storage or parking on the roof of the building
2) All signage shall conform to City code requirements
A
1 3) The detailed landscape plan shall emphasize the Hwy. 13 corridor image.
ASSESSMENTS: Lot 6, Block 2, Sibley Terminal Industrial Park has
fulfilled assessment obligations except for a portion of the
"lateral benefit from storm sewer trunk" identified as follows:
PROJ. # DESCRIPTION RATE QUANTITY AMOUNT
214 Storm Sewer Lateral $9.74/ff 341.47(A) $3,326
TOTAL PROPOSED ASSESSMENT $3,326
(A) Includes 150 foot corner lot credit
In accordance with present City special assessment policies, the
assessment is proposed as a condition of approval.
1)k-Q
f ,
4,1 , �� :.�
\
•00 wouidolanea aesitrea
eiNiamne am:re:lois
"Itt.I.NE121 CI3SOctOtid
I
-1..‘..1=INJAIIIAS "INIVOICT3
" .14 .
rai
-n .N.• ...'
. ?:....,-,.. -.A...r-
!,
.
I l t i, 1 , ,__- ._
Ili 1
■.1, i . ..
1 lT "
1°
I \\
,6 ) '.---;,• ,,,>„; .
i 1
,!1 1
---- • 1 -
---
4 P.;-;-i 1.""': .•- ,---?
4
—
4. 1 . .:SS P41\111/4.1
•00 luatudoienea legueci
opalcnins ss-dr...4co.s
as sociotic i
-..
,....
a3/4
tt
cos,
-------,:::::
,
_ _ :
‘-a• ..-
_-
--f ._._----
1 .
, • 7 1.-
. :,..." .....: -.1 , 11::: \ \
... - ---...,.....,._ ....... ____ ____
...... ..,„„ ....... ........ ...... ............. ....
......
.. ....... .--- -„_„ . .
.,•?,,„..
_ ,.. , •.... ........ ....- ,-.,„ ----_____, '. ---\''- :r:27.11;
-----------
---------
...... ...
.---
- -- \
1-- 'Ne
1 -- 3. - i\ •.
7_
1.
1 -, .L. , --_-_-_-•-..,4
, •,- - ..... --- -s- - ;: - .1-, 1
,1:-
_ -•,------------ '72: .........-- ...... _.. i v.
' - •--- . ..... ---
\
6 : ,7 1, - - - - - - L - - - '• _ „ . ,,„ . . \ill -ca
. .... ...., z
. .......4
1111 ■4-‘1.7,..,
.A\ . • ill -1
f
.... ,, ..c
, - - it
. 2... 4 S
i
4 .4-
: 1
\ „ : IR
„, I
4
• •
- •
-”
•
v■ t
...... "
' Y„ ;
...... """
'
.11111sam mikatisia:141- _
"
gAtC
T.
1
a
I
i
'
_
,
I
i
•TYPICht_'
{
Hill
CHFH
I
i
1
BM lTY PILAU T
MN. L..-rrilLAU
PROPOSED RENTAL
STORAGE FACILITY
DanBar Development co.
L_ c v t.._._ • a ev
T7 ►%LAI
i
V/ Was-
• .c.
r VIL._
1 77 !\LJL.
city of eagan
PUBLIC
WORKS
DEPARTMENT
STORM SEWER
MASTER PLAN
approved:
standard
plate 4:
4;1 FA V(
•
'1
P. L. 4 rr
JOHN,f; /1
-*
30 C -a \
CP
cr
7/9
15.0
,_S EY.. _Tr Mil NA
C
,LN
" •
? e
33
!_. << {L « 1 ;.61)
2 4 .
COACHMM.N —k
oaks 11
11 i ,
;OACHMAti
GHLA $ -
•
A -bbb
•
CP -9
698.0
702.0
—10 �=
/ ' 790.0 :'
_802.0,
I
c
1 / ?0 1
/k , CP -6 �'
;�� "' ' I %/ 790.7
/. �
..
- 'I �AP,- 2 7 ✓ /i ` 806.0 .\ di
k 806.0 .\
796.3 < ��.'
80,4
I � • 2% •) 4 \` MDGCVIe l i '` � ^
KENOFIC.___. -- ,.... - -A �� _ is fT'
_ - -.. -• SUBJECT PARCEL
L '
--4- 77,r -7- 1 - 71:1 - 17 - 1
__J
1 _1 - 14:10.),, , 7/ •
1.x_1 f)
CP :2= - -� - --1 1_ =
823.5
829.7
CP -12'
826. 5
829.6
/:
/
CP— 11
795.0
non
r
CP-
-�� '850
PARK
24C -9 :
r( t,,
C P'— l .
825.0
829.7
ell
FIG. *1
APC Minutes
March 22, 1988
OUTLOT B, TOWN CENTRE 70 1ST ADDITION - FEDERAL LAND COMPANY
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (SHOPPING CENTER SIGN)
The second public hearing of the evening was called in regard to
the application of Federal Land Company for a 35 foot tall pylon
sign for the Town Centre Shopping Center located on Outlot B of the
Town Centre 70 1st Addition west of Town Centre Road, along I -35E in
the northwest quarter of Section 15. Mr. Sturm described the major
complex sign which was to be located on the west side of the Pizza
Hut lot. He indicated that City Code does allow a variance from
height and size requirements for major complex or shopping center
signs.
Mr. Charles Bartholdi was present on behalf of the applicant and
indicated that this was a major complex sign, one of seven, allowed
within the Sign Agreement, noting that one sign had been used for
the Car Care Center, one for the Pizza Hut, and the proposed sign
leaving 4 signs available per the Agreement, west of Town Centre
Drive. He described the sign as compatible with the Shopping Center
and approximately 160 square feet in size with open viewing through
the bottom.
Mr. Colon advised Mr. Voracek that the pole with the red flag
last winter was a test as to the visibility of the proposed sign
from I -35E and other locations. He stated that it would be possible
to see the sign approximately one -half mile north on I -35E, allowing
traffic to access in time onto Yankee Doodle Road. He indicated
that the sign would not be seen from South I -35E until passing under
Pilot Knob Road.
Merkley moved, Voracek seconded the motion to'recommend approval
of the conditional use permit, subject to the following conditions:
1. The one -time sign fee of $2.50 per square foot for all four
sides.
2. The maximum height /size shall be determined or approved by
the Council.
All voted yes.
THE DAN BAR COMPANY - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
Chairman Pawlenty then convened the public hearing in regard to
the application of Dan Bar Company for conditional use permit to
allow an on -site residence for a mini - storage facility located on
Lot 6, Block 2, Sibley Terminal Industrial Park located west of
Highway #13 in the southeast quarter of Section 8. Mr. Sturm
advised that the application was strictly in regard to the
residential use and that the property was already platted and zoned
3
APC Minutes
March 22, 1988
for the proposed E -Z Storage facility, consisting of 4 levels of
approximately 71,775 square feet per level. He noted that the
proposal did not exceed the guidelines for an EAW. The property
included a 40 foot drop into which the building was to be built with
35% lot coverage. Any pylon signs would have to be requested later
through a conditional use permit and landscaping would be addressed
prior to final plat.
Mr. Dante representing Dan Bar was present and indicated that
the residential building would actually be a home office for the
resident manager. The storage structure itself would be enhanced
over typical storage facilities - fully enclosed, four stories tall
and completely weatherproofed. He advised that staff had been very
professional and courteous. He stated that the storage structure
would be of concrete and steel, while the resident manager's home
would be a rambler type of not more than 1,500 square feet, which
was included in the 35% lot coverage. Mr. Dante suggested that all
mini - storage facilities have on -site residences and that in this
particular case, it was necessary for security and that the manager
would monitor the security system once the building was closed up in
the evenings. He advised member Miller that when the manager was on
vacation or leave, a substitute would be in the residence.
Trygg moved, Miller seconded the motion to recommend approval of
the conditional use permit. All voted yes.
WAIVER OF PLAT - CALVARY MEMORIAL CHURCH
Mr. Pawlenty then convened the public° hearing in regard to the
applicati3n of Calvary Memorial Church requesting a waiver of
to allow a colnueyance of land within Sunset 10th' Addition located
south of Diffle R oad just west of Dodd Road. James Sturm noted
that the plat was approved in October of 1985 for a.church site and
four single family homes. Lots 1 and 2 contain .75 and 1.3 acres,
are heavily wooded and include steep terrain. The proposed waiver
of plat would split the Zrorthwest portion of Lot 2 combining a 65
foot by 130 foot piece with Lo t_ to the south, and then combining a
131 foot by 130 foot piece with Lot 6 of,Sunset llth Addition to the
west. No additional building permits - ,were proposed or would be
allowed.
Pastor Randy Barrows was present and indicated that all lots
have been sold except Lots 2,, -Block 1.
Dan O'Brien and Val Tinker, the owners of the two - parcels that
would acquire land from the split were present and explal ed their
desire to maintain the area as woods and provide a buffer for heir
homes. They stated that they would not be requesting any additional
building permit ,,.
cD3
Agenda Information Memo
April 5, 1988, City Council Meeting
WAIVER OF PLAT /CALVARY MEMORIAL CHURCH
F. Waiver of Plat /Calvary Memorial Church, to Split Lot 2, Block
1, Sunset 10th Addition for a Conveyance of Land - -A public
hearing was held by the Advisory Planning Commission at their
last regular meeting held on March 22, 1988, to consider a waiver
of plat in order to split Lot 2, Block 1, Sunset 10th Addition,
for a conveyance of land located south of County Road 30. The
APC is recommending approval.
For additional information on this item, refer to the Planning
and Engineering Departments report, a copy is enclosed on pages
1aS through 1Q-6 •
For a copy of the APC minutes on this item, refer to
page (s )Li7 1 A
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the
waiver of plat for Calvary Memorial Church to split Lot 2, Block
1, Sunset 10th Addition.
SUBJECT: WAIVER OF PLAT
APPLICANT: CALVARY MEMORIAL CHURCH
LOCATION: NW 1/4 SECT 21
EXISTING ZONING: R -1 WITHIN THE LEXINGTON SOUTH PD
DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: MARCH 22, 1988
DATE OF REPORT: MARCH 10, 1988
REPORTED BY: PLANNING & ENGINEERING DEPARTMENTS
APPLICATIONS:
An application has been submitted requesting a Waiver of Plat to allow a
conveyance of land within the Sunset 10th Addition located south of Diffley
Road just west of Dodd Road. This plat was approved in October 1985 for a
church site and four single family lots. Lots 1 and 2 of this subdivision
contain .75 and 1.3 acres, respectively. They are heavily wooded and steeply
sloped towards a ponding area along the south side of Diffley Road that
separates the church area from the single family area.
The proposed waiver will split the northwest portion of Lot 2, combining a
65'x 130' piece with Lot 1 to the south and combining a 131'x130' piece with
Lot 6 of the Sunset 11th Addition to the west. No additional building sites
are proposed or would be allowed with this waiver. The restricted access from
Diffley Road would remain in effect.
CITY OF EAGAN
Calvary Memorial Church has been unable to sell Lot 2 because of its large
size. With this split, it is still a buildable site containing 27,530 sq. ft.
Purchase agreements have been submitted to the City as proof that the sales
will occur continent on the approval of the Waiver of Plat. This was
requested so no landlocked parcels would possibly be created.
If approved, this Waiver of Plat shall be subject to:
1. All applicable code ordinances.
2. No additional home sites will be allowed on the newly- created parcels.
/ SUNSET SIXTH ADDITION
(DIFFLEY ROAD) + COUNTY
LT"
LJ
cf,
, r
cr .
N
. MOD
1-
OD r
(I)
i
0.
ES
0
z
00 09
r1)
CC
LiJ
00 09
- - - — — - — —
c, ,
- 1
m E 2
mm€_
ix
LO
-J ''l to 71
cn o
il 'i I
3.92,11.00S
60'91•17
1-
0
L 0 •
; r-
--r_ 2 4
n •
\ \Ig'914
,10100N
*rr
0)
o
co 0
. cr 0
09
CO
1
1
1
1
ro
0 N
- co
, r
ro •
N
CO
I-•
(./
3.92,11.00 S
00 60Z
— 00 61— -
10
L,
C
/
3.40 .0 S
I
7(
-J
00
ii
ol.15i
1 13 8
?(00N1
00 09
',M.SV,10.00N
4
006t•1
•
M.gi7.10.0oN ‘,
1.1 11
,
\a(e
I
1238.
dri8e,us
APC Minutes
March 22, 1988
for the proposed E -Z Storage facility, consisting of 4 levels of
approximately 71,775 square feet per level. He noted that the
proposa did not exceed the guidelines for an EAW. The property
include 3 a 40 foot drop into which the building was to be built with
35% lot ge. Any pylon signs would have to be requested later
through \\ a con 'tional use permit and landscaping would be addressed
prior to final plat.
Mr. Dante representing Dan Bar was present and indicated that
the residential building .would actually be a home office for the
resident manager. The storage itself would be enhanced
over typical storage facilities ----fully enclosed, four stories tall
and completely weatherproofed. He "advised that staff had been very
professional and courteous. He: stated that the storage structure
would be of concrete and steel, while the--resident manager's home
would be a rambler type ;of not more than 1, 50.0 square feet, which
was included in the 35% lot coverage. Mr. Dante suggested that all
mini - storage facilities have on -site residences and that in this
particular case, it necessary for security and that, the manager
would monitor the; - security system once the building was closed up in
the evenings. He advised member Miller that when the manager was on
vacation or ,leave, a substitute would be in the residence.
Trygg moved, Miller seconded the motion to recommend approval
the conditional use permit. All voted yes.
WAIVER OF PLAT - CALVARY MEMORIAL CHURCH
Mr. Pawlenty then convened the public hearing in regard to the
application of Calvary Memorial Church requesting a waiver of plat
to allow a conveyance of land within Sunset 10th Addition located
south of Diffley Road just west of Dodd Road. James Sturm noted
that the plat was approved in October of 1985 for a church site and
four single family homes. Lots 1 and 2 contain .75 and 1.3 acres,
are heavily wooded and include steep terrain. The proposed waiver
of plat would split the northwest portion of Lot 2 combining a 65
foot by 130 foot piece with Lot 1 to the south, and then combining a
131 foot by 130 foot piece with Lot 6 of Sunset llth Addition to the
west. No additional building permits were proposed or would be
allowed.
Pastor Randy Barrows was present and indicated that all lots
have been sold except Lots 2, Block 1.
Dan O'Brien and Val Tinker, the owners of the two parcels that
would acquire land from the split were present and explained their
desire to maintain the area as woods and provide a buffer for their
homes. They stated that they would not be requesting any additional
building permits.
APC Minutes
March 22, 1988
Voracek moved, Trygg seconded the motion to recommend approval
of the waiver of plat, subject to the following conditions:
1. All applicable code ordinances.
2. No additional home sites will be allowed on the newly -
created parcels.
All voted yes.
The next public hearing of the evening was convened by Chaian
Pawle•ty in regard to the application of Don and Mary Olso3 for a
prelimi•ary plat of 1.0 acres of R -1 zoned land within the Eagan
Hills Wes PD for two single family lots located along theme east side
of Rahn Roa: north of Shale Lane in the northwest quarter of
Section 29. . Sturm explained that the proposal was'a very simply
two -lot prelim ary plat, along Rahn Road providing/access thereto.
The larger lot wo d consist of approximately 18,Q00 square feet and
the smaller of 12,75 square feet. The barn /would have to be
removed before any building permits could be issued for the smaller
lot.
OLSON ADDITION - PRELIMINARY PLAT
Member Voracek questioned.. whether the barn could be used for
storage. Mr. Runkle pointed but that an accessory structure may be
used in such a manner for a perib.d of,one year but then must be
removed.
Trygg moved, Garry seconded t motion to recommend approval of
the preliminary plat, subject to/the fol \ wing conditions:
1. This development ,shall accept it.s additional assessment
obligations as defined in the staff's report '`ih accordance with the
final plat dimensions and/ the rates in effect at \the time of final
plat approval.
2. This development shall dedicate 10 foot drains e and utility
easements centered aver all common lot lines and adjacen to private
property or public /'right -of -way.
3. This d hlopment shall dedicate, provide, or finan
guarantee its proportionate share of the acquisition cos s of
additional d inage, ponding, and utility easements as required by
the alignment, depth, and storage capacity of all required publ c
utilities/ and streets located beyond the boundaries of this plat or
outside bf dedicated public right -of -way as necessary to service
this development.
Agenda Information Memo
April 5, 1988, City Council Meeting
PRELIMINARY PLAT /OLSON ADDITION
G. Preliminary Plat, Don and Mary Olson for Olson Addition
Consisting of 1.05 Acres of R -1 Zoned Land Within Eagan Hills
West P.D. for Two Single Family Lots - -A public hearing was held
before the Advisory Planning Commission at their last regular
meeting held on March 22, 1988, to consider an application
requesting a preliminary plat for the Olson Addition consisting
of two single family lots on .72 acres located east of Rahn Road
and north of Shale Lane. The APC is recommending approval of
this item.
Enclosed on pages r2) 0 through 13'7 is a copy of the Planning and
Engineering Departments report for the Olson Addition preliminary
plat.
Enclosed on page(s) [3 (39is a copy of the APC minutes on this
item.
The Advisory Parks and Recreation Commission will review this
plat at their April 7 meeting, therefore, any approval will be
subject to their recommendation.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the
preliminary plat entitled Olson Addition subject to the APRC
recommendations.
aG\
CITY OF EAGAN
SUBJECT: PRELIMINARY PLAT (OLSON ADDITION)
APPLICANT: DON OLSON
LOCATION: NW 1/4, SECTION 29
EXISTING ZONING: P.D. R -1
DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: APRIL 26, 1988
DATE OF REPORT: MARCH 14, 1988
REPORTED BY: PLANNING AND ENGINEERING DEPARTMENTS
APPLICATIONS: An application has been submitted requesting a Preliminary Plat
for the Olson Addition. This plat consists of 2 single family lots on .72
acres located along the east side of Rahn Road just north of Shale Lane. This
plan is in conformance with the Eagan Hills West planned development and
City's Land Use Plan.
SITE PLAN: Lot 1 will contain 18,750 s.f. and the existing brick farm house.
The newly created Lot 2 (12,750 s.f.) currently has a barn on it that will be
removed. The existing home is connected to city sewer but not water. Code
requires a minimum lot size of one acre for R -1 districts without sewer and
water. The applicant is willing to make this connection.
GRADING /DRAINAGE /EROSION CONTROL: Only minor grading is required
on proposed Lot 2 in order to establish a suitable building site.
Site generated runoff from proposed Lots 1 and 2 is proposed to
be directed as it has in the past. Site development will have
little impact on adjacent properties.
UTILITIES: Sanitary sewer of sufficient depth and capacity to
serve the site is readily available along Rahn Road. Sanitary
sewer service exists for proposed Lot 1 and is proposed for Lot
2. The proposed sanitary sewer service to Lot 2 will require a
cleanout located on the property line.
Water main service of sufficient capacity and pressure is readily
available along Rahn Road. Existing water service has been
provided to proposed Lot 1 and is proposed for Lot 2.
ACCESS /EASEMENTS /RIGHT -OF- WAY /PERMITS: Access to the proposed
site is readily available from Rahn Road. Sufficient right -of-
way for Rahn Road and sufficient easements for the existing
utilities along the east side of Rahn Road are proposed by this
development.
The development will be responsible for obtaining the proper
permits from the City of Eagan for excavation in public right -
of -way and hookup to existing utilities.
ASSESSMENTS: The proposed parcel has no pending assessments of
record and has been levied its share of special assessments for
street and utilities except for the following:
PROJ # DESCRIPTION
236 Lateral benefit $13.10 /ff 155 ff $2,030.00
trunk water main
TOTAL PROPOSED ASSESSMENT $2,030.00
The above assessment is proposed as a condition of final plat
approval and is in accordance with City of Eagan's special
assessment policy #82 -1. All final assessment obligations will
be calculated based on the quantitiesand dimensions of the final
plat and in accordance with the rates in effect at the time of
the final plat approval.
CONDITIONS: OLSON ADDITION
RATE QUANTITY AMOUNT
1. These standard conditions of plat approval as adopted by
Council action on September 15, 1987 shall be complied with:
Al, B1, B2, B3, C2, El, F1, and G1.
2. The applicant shall connect to City water on Lot 1.
STANDARD CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL
A. Assessments
1. This development shall accept its additional assessment
obligations as defined in the staff's report in
accordance with the final plat dimensions and the rates
in effect at the time of final plat approval.
B. Easements and Rights -of -Way
1. This development shall dedicate 10' drainage and utility
easements centered over all common lot lines and adjacent
to private property or public right -of -way.
2. This development shall dedicate, provide, or financially
guarantee its proportionate share of the acquisition
costs of additional drainage, ponding, and utility
easements as required by the alignment, depth, and
storage capacity of all required public utilities and
streets located beyond the boundaries of this plat or
outside of dedicated public right -of -way as necessary to
service this development.
3. This development shall dedicate all public right -of -way
and temporary slope easements for ultimate development of
adjacent roadways as required by the appropriate
jurisdictional agency.
4. This development shall dedicate adequate drainage and
ponding easements to incorporate the required high water
elevation necessitated by City storm water storage volume
requirements.
C. Plans and Specifications
1. All public streets and utilities necessary to provide
service to this development shall be designed by a
registered professional engineer in accordance with City
codes and engineering standards and policies, and
approved by staff prior to final plat approval.
2. A detailed grading, drainage, erosion, and sediment
control plan must be prepared in accordance with current
City standards and approved by staff prior to final plat
approval.
3. This development shall insure that all temporary dead end
public streets shall have a cul -de -sac constructed in
accordance with City engineering standards.
4. A detailed landscape plan shall be submitted on the
proposed grading plan and approved by staff prior to the
final plat approval. The financial guarantee shall be
included in the Development Contract and not released
until one year after the date of installation.
i�Z
STANDARD CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL
PAGE TWO
LTS #2
STANDARD
5. All internal public and private streets shall be
constructed within the required right -of -way in
accordance with City design standards.
D. Public Improvements
1 . I f any public improvements are to be installed under a
City contract, the appropriate project must be approved
by Council action prior to final plat approval.
E. Permits
1. This development shall be responsible for the acquisition
of all regulatory agency permits in the time frame
required by the affected agency.
F. Parks Dedication
1. This development shall fulfull its parks dedication
requirements as recommended by the Advisory Parks and
Recreation Commission and approved by Council action.
G. Other
1. All standard platting and zoning conditions shall be
adhered to unless specifically granted a variance by
Council action.
Advisory Planning Commission City Council
Approved: August 25, 1987 September 15, 1987
Revised:
QQILQ
ZONING
- 1 7 AND USE
11
- r- r • 1
R's
a
)
(
"
.• ,
^ ( • 'PV.Z11, 1
IV \
\ /14 : 04
.•
FiT7,77717.77.771)
cn
a
..‘?%
g •■
VCP6'
RAHN
0/•--
••- et...■
0
m
i
gi
..., VCPP 0 .S.^}.■ •
ROAD
1
/ BLOCK
n 57. A. 0 liC • cuts ■•••■•••••••P
. —
1 g I
E in
1
FIG4*3
city of eagan
PUBLIC
WORKS
DEPARTMENT
WATER
MASTER PLAN
. s.
approved:
■
standard
plate *:
iY/
APC Minutes
March 22, 1988
N.;( moved, Trygg seconded the motion to recommend approval
of the waiver of p-1at,_._subject to the following conditions:
1. All applicable code ordinances.
2. No additional home sites will
created parcels.
All voted yes.
OLSON ADDITION - PRELIMINARY PLAT
allowed on the newly -
-_._,'\.
The next public hearing of the evening was convened by Chairman
Pawlenty in regard to the application of Don and Mary Olson for a
preliminary plat of 1.0 acres. of R -1 zoned land within the Eagan
Hills West PD for two single family lots located along the east side
of Rahn Road, north of Shale Lane in the northwest quarter of
Section 29. Mr. Sturm explained that the proposal was a very simply
two -lot preliminary plat, along Rahn Road providing access thereto.
The larger lot would consist of approximately 18,000 square feet and
the smaller of 12,750 square feet. The barn would have to be
removed before any building permits could be issued for the smaller
lot.
Member Voracek questioned whether the barn could be used for
storage. Mr. Runkle pointed out that an accessory structure may be
used in such a manner for a period of one year but then must be
removed.
Trygg moved, Garry seconded the motion to recommend approval of
the preliminary plat, subject to the following conditions:
1. This development shall accept its additional assessment
obligations as defined in the staff's report in accordance with the
final plat dimensions and the rates in effect at the time of final
plat approval.
2. This development shall dedicate 10 foot drainage and utility
easements centered over all common lot lines and adjacent to private
property or public right -of -way.
3. This development shall dedicate, provide, or financially
guarantee its proportionate share of the acquisition costs of
additional drainage, ponding, and utility easements as required by
the alignment, depth, and storage capacity of all required public
utilities and streets located beyond the boundaries of this plat or
outside of dedicated public right -of -way as necessary to service
this development.
APC Minutes
March 22, 1988
4. This development shall dedicate all public right -of -way and
temporary slope easements for ultimate development of adjacent
roadways as required by the appropriate jurisdictional agency.
5. A detailed grading, drainage, erosion, and sediment control
plan must be prepared in accordance with current City standards and
approved by staff prior to final plat approval.
6. This development shall be responsible for the acquisition of
all regulatory agency permits in the time frame required by the
affected agency.
7. This development shall fulfill its parks dedication
requirements as recommended by the Advisory Parks and Recreation
Commission and approved by Council action.
8. All standard platting and zoning conditions shall be adhered
to unless specifically granted a variance by Council action.
9. The applicant shall connect to City water on Lot 1.
All voted in favor.
HOSFORD ADDITION - REZONING & PRELIMINARY PLAT
Cha' an Tim Pawlenty convened the public hearing in regard to
the applications of John and Karen Hosford for' rezoning of five A
(Agriculturaljacres to R -1 (Single Family) district, and a
preliminary plat 'Containing 4 lots located south of Deerwood Drive
in the southwest quarter of Section, -22. Mr. Sturm described the
proposal in detail and ind-icated that/it was staff's recommendation
that a stub street not be previdee with the understanding that the
property to the west could e access to Deerwood Drive. This
would also allow the widths of all 1 s to meet City Code standards.
Mr. John Hosford was 'zsent and indicted that he was flexible
and willing to proceed' as directed by the City He did point out
n the property to his west;,,had expressed a
in one or two years. It appe ed that there
space along the front of the Fritz's roperty to
ccess from Deerwood Drive. He then described a
plan that would include the Rocco A1tobelli
that the Fritzes that
desire to develop wi
was not adequate
provide a street
proposed overal
property also /west of the Fritz property. This proposal as
intended to save as many trees as possible.
Mr. ike Kohler, the owner of the property east of the Hosford
proper , questioned the repercussions of such a development on his
prop
Agenda Information Memo
April 5, 1988, City Council Meeting
PRELIMINARY PLAT AND REZONING /WHISPERING WOODS 4TH ADDITION
H. Rezoning, Burnsville Lumber, Whispering Woods 4th Addition,
of 5.7 Acres from A to R -1 Containing a 14 Lot Preliminary Plat- -
A public hearing was held at the last Advisory Planning
Commission to consider two applications from Burnsville Lumber
requesting a preliminary plat of 27.7 acre development and a
rezoning of 5.7 acres within the area from A to R -1. The
development will ultimately consist of 57 lots on the 27.1 acres
with the first phase containing 14 lots on the 5.7 R -1 zoned
land. The APC is recommending approval of both the rezoning and
preliminary plat applications.
For a copy of t Planning and Engineering Departments report,
refer to pages NI through /0
For a copy of the APC minutes, refer to pages /E( through
The Advisory Parks and Recreation Commission will review this
plat at their April 7 meeting, therefore, any approval will be
subject to their recommendation.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the
rezoning from A to R -1 and the preliminary plat entitled
Whispering Woods 4th Addition subject to APRC recommendations.
/4 0
CITY OF EAGAN
SUBJECT: REZONING, PRELIMINARY PLAT, VARIANCE
(WHISPERING WOODS 4TH ADDITION)
APPLICANT: BURNSVILLE LUMBER
LOCATION: SW 1/4, SECTION 31
EXISTING ZONING: AG (AGRICULTURAL)
DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: MARCH 22, 1988
DATE OF REPORT: MARCH 10, 1988
REPORTED BY: PLANNING & ENGINEERING DEPARTMENTS
APPLICATIONS: Separate applications have been submitted requesting a
Preliminary Plat of 27.7 AG (Agricultural) acres and a Rezoning of 5.7 acres
within that area to an R -1 (Single Family) district for the Whispering Woods
4th Addition. This development will ultimately consist of 57 lots on the 27.7
acres with the first phase containing 14 lots on the 5.7 R -1 zoned land. If
the Preliminary Plat is approved, subsequent rezonings and final plats will be
required as development occurs. This proposal is in conformance with the
City's most recent Land Use Plan.
The variance request is for:
1) 10' front yard setbacks (30' to 20') for Lots 2 -5, Block 4
2) 20' front yard setbacks (50' to 30') along Slater Road for Lots
23 and 25, Block 2 and Lots 11 and 12, Block 4.
Similar variances along Slater Road have been approved in other subdivisions
and those along the interior street are consistent with the 3rd Addition.
EXISTING CONDITIONS: This densly wooded site consisting primarily of oaks
also contains numerous knolls and depressions. The hardship for the proposed
variances was based on these conditions and the developers intent to save as
many trees as possible. Surrounding land uses are single family to the north
and west (Burnsville), single family and agricultural to the east and
unplatted agricultural land to the south along with a large ponding area.
SITE PLAN: This layout extends both James Street and Whispering Trail to the
south looping back to Slater Road. Outlots A and B near the southeast portion
of the plat will eventually become single family lots when that area develops.
The lots vary in size from 12,000 s.f. to 27,000 s.f. with most in the 12-
14,000 s.f. range. As proposed, Lot 24, Block 2 would need a variance since
it is only 30' (50' required) at the street right -of -way line. Public access
is also provided from Slater Road, however, due to falling grades from the
road, the long driveway from the south is a more likely alternative for site
development. The proposed density for the 27.7 acres is 2.1 units /acre.
GRADING /DRAINAGE /EROSION CONTROL: The preliminary grading plan
submitted for review for the proposed 4th Addition shows cut and
fill areas of approximately 8' -20'. No preliminary grading plan
was submitted for review for the balance of the property included
in the preliminary plat. Even though a preliminary grading plan
was not submitted for the balance of the property not included in
the 4th Addition, preliminary street grades were provided. The
proposed street grades in the 4th Addition and balance of the
property meet all City Code requirements.
No preliminary design for street storm sewer was submitted for
the proposed 4th Addition as well as the remaining balance of the
property. The preliminary street grades identify high points and
low points but no storm sewer serving these low points was
identified. A preliminary storm sewer design with drainage areas
identified is required for further processing of this
application. The development proposes storm sewer to pick up a
backyard low area common to Lots 1 -7, Block 1, of the proposed
Whispering Woods 4th Addition, and the northerly adjacent Oak
Cliff development.
A ponding area is proposed in the backyard areas of Lots 3 -5,
Block 4, of a future phase. A ponding easement is also required.
Preliminary storm sewer and drainage area calculations are needed
to ensure an adequate ponding design is developed. From the
drainage area calculations based on the preliminary grading plan,
a determination will be made as to if the outlet for the proposed
ponding area is required at this time or can be constructed
during the development of a subsequent phase. At the time of
preparation of this report, staff and the developer are working
out the details for the preliminary storm sewer design.
No erosion and sediment control plan was submitted for review.
The developer is required to submit preliminary grading, drainage
and erosion control plans prior to issuance of any grading
permit.
UTILITIES: Sanitary sewer of adequate capacity and depth to
serve the 4th Addition and subsequent platting phases has been
provided to the site. The development proposes to adequately
serve all platted lots with sanitary sewer service.
Water main service of adequate capacity and pressure to serve the
4th Addition and subsequent phases of development have been
provided through previous developments. The development proposes
to adequately serve all platted lots and loop the water main
system. Hydrant coverage is subject to further review during
preparation and review of detail construction plans which is
included as a part of the final plat approval process.
STREETS /ACCESS /CIRCULATION: Access to the proposed 4th Addition
and future phases is provided by James Street in the Oak Cliff
development, Whispering Trail through the Whispering Woods 3rd
Addition and Slater Road, opposite Whispering Woods 2nd Addition
along the easterly boundary of the development. The development
proposes to provide adequate street service through this site to
serve all platted lots.
)\Q-
EASEMENTS /PERMITS /RIGHTS -OF -WAY: The development is proposing
street right -of -way widths in accordance with City Code for the
proposed internal streets. No additional right -of -way is
required for Slater Road.
The development is required to provide appropriate ponding
easements and utility easements for public utilities outside of
the proposed public right -of -way.
All regulatory agency permits shall be acquired within the
appropriate time frame as required by the affected agency.
ASSESSMENTS: In accordance with City special assessment policies
in effect at this time, the following assessment is proposed as a
condition of final plat approval:
PROJ # DESCRIPTION RATE QTY AMT
Future Storm Sewer Trunk $.056 /sf 1,019,304 $57,081
TOTAL PROPOSED ASSESSMENT $57,081
In accordance with a Joint Powers Agreement with the City of
Burnsville, all trunk area assessment revenue is to be
transferred to them for the financing of the downstream trunk
storm sewer facilities through Burnsville.
All final assessment obligations will be calculated based on the
quantities and dimensions of the final plat and in accordance
with the rates in effect at the time of the final plat approval.
CONDITIONS: WHISPERING WOODS 4TH ADDITION
1. These standard conditions of plat approval as adopted by
Council action on September 15, 1987 shall be complied with:
Al, B1, B2, B3, 84, Cl, C2, C5, D1, El, F1, and Gl.
2. Subsequent Rezonings to R -1 districts shall be required with each
phase of development prior to the preparation of the Final Plats.
3. The variances as listed in the Staff DReport shall be approved.
4. Lot 24, Block 2 shall have a southerly access with 30' at the
street right -of -way line.
��3
A. Assessments
STANDARD CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL
1. This development shall accept its additional assessment
obligations as defined in the staff's report in
accordance with the final plat dimensions and the rates
in effect at the time of final plat approval.
B. Easements and Rights -of -Way
1. This development shall dedicate 10' drainage and utility
easements centered over all common lot lines and adjacent
to private property or public right -of -way.
2. This development shall dedicate, provide, or financially
guarantee its proportionate share of the acquisition
costs of additional drainage, ponding, and utility
easements as required by the alignment, depth, and
storage capacity of all required public utilities and
streets located beyond the boundaries of this plat or
outside of dedicated public right -of -way as necessary to
service this development.
3. This development shall dedicate all public right -of -way
and temporary slope easements for ultimate development of
adjacent roadways as required by the appropriate
jurisdictional agency.
4. This development shall dedicate adequate drainage and
ponding easements to incorporate the required high water
elevation necessitated by City storm water storage volume
requirements.
C. Plans and Specifications
1. All public streets and utilities necessary to provide
service to this development shall be designed by a
registered professional engineer in accordance with City
codes and engineering standards and policies, and
approved by staff prior to final plat approval.
2. A detailed grading, drainage, erosion, and sediment
control plan must be prepared in accordance with current
City standards and approved by staff prior to final plat
approval.
3. This development shall insure that all temporary dead end
public streets shall have a cul -de -sac constructed in
accordance with City engineering standards.
4. A detailed landscape plan shall be submitted on the
proposed grading plan and approved by staff prior to the
final plat approval. The financial guarantee shall be
included in the Development Contract and not released
until one year after the date of installation.
STANDARD CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL
PAGE TWO
5. All internal public and private streets shall be
constructed within the required right -of -way in
accordance with City design standards.
D. Public Improvements
1. If any public improvements are to be installed under a
City contract, the appropriate project must be approved
by Council action prior to final plat approval.
E. Permits
1. This development shall be responsible for the acquisition
of all regulatory agency permits in the time frame
required by the affected agency.
F. Parks Dedication
1. This development shall fulfull its parks dedication
requirements as recommended by the Advisory Parks and
Recreation Commission and approved by Council action.
G. Other
1. All standard platting and zoning conditions shall be
adhered to unless specifically granted a variance by
Council action.
Advisory Planning Commission City Council
Approved: August 25, 1987 September 15, 1987
Revised:
LTS #2
STANDARD
4
i
(
1
LOCATION
• ------ -
•
t.
of To•
- • - • - . y r:::
. .
• • '
, - ----
a : /
- ”Ar — •
------- _/ • •••.:1 ,
---
' • ----
• • ...
•
— —r - -
o
cc-
O•
c
•
111 -..•,.
w
•• ••. — ...., .....
•
c o\
1 - 11.1%1' = ii l
, 'Iii — Ill '33
f10 it•. {; ° a: iii l - _ -
1.. ii..-i: -: ii i.l: ....—--0------..t u. i
! 1 3!-I'-1 1- ,_° i: i, r . m....f...— ..,•. ,- ..- a.,.�.t
•c =s : =iii• .�. ..
12... i ° !jI Ili } 'Vila%
' -i
:i.i..
•i..} - r
1.i
ti: ic•
=.i•:I.xl
1
_i3
city of eagan
PUBLIC
WORKS
DEPARTMENT
4 AP-21
893 1 mAPI
901 0 AP
- . 8923
• ' 898.8
A-pp
)1,,r1 id-nTir-TI 1.:.•.-:-?1,,■Y!'r :i. rl
------• . -2 '-':----:. • .' 1 L ..:1 1
-.'•27--"-T 72 1-") AP - A-8 / ,.
II 1 :
A "' W I
f'c'f.N, PEU88 fr 3
1-"''ACC ie'"17*-41:18FH-0365
A., ; 8860 I
1 ((-- - ■
. _ .
1 -AP-511 . / !' 7
890
AP
/ , / 9100
/ 9/8.1
/. _
, Li F F : : / ://
' - Bp 9 ,r_v ;
.:. 12 ./.3. . 911 3
. ...•y. - . ,..: : . i / 893 3 ' I !, ' - ` 91-9.6
AP 1 AP - ,''..A 4 9040 ilk
8720 . 8736 ...6 .;
..„8p9, 89 3
-
'BP-10
874 2 6820
15. 12. . - \ . .,r, ••909 B•
NT) v e
. -- 9 /6 0
• , Z,t, ; B 9 P 1 1 6 0 ■ :::.'l<
889 3 -\ '■ ,
.; ...1
7.9200
.,
i.rf, AP-49 .^.1` 1 1 I ..,:'
881.7 ‘I. 9000 ,/ ,. i
. P-40
\ '
A.,,s Cl'cl 0
- -v •Vi ,' r ..* -Q5 1 '
, l' - '" 894.0 !I
Il 'AP ' )8C-3' 80 5 894 7 55
,..._,:)
I
/ma __.....,'
-',a P-42 1
8950 ; ' ' '..___'. 1
AP -
889.2' r ; -"'"'"- - • --
/ /
: '
ILE: e. .1r
1 7 :.71
AP-4
934.0 AP-17. .
.940.5
V.112 989.2
1 • 895..9
rtrf At
CArAcil -
I, A
985.3
I - 1
I 0 k
•:•:•••••:•:•••••:•:•:,:•:•:•:
SUBJECT PARCEL
....•.•.•....•.....• .
STORM SEWER
MASTER PLAN 1.5
1 / -
(11 1 i
1
• .91
5 !'„,
BP-2
9201
BP-22
AP-10 A-11 ' 1 i. i -- ---
(± 0 8P -31. .......
• • - 4
919 7 \ , ii !. _.;?. If , AP • . 1) ,,' , 935 0 (
....., :v
925 6 v. ,,
. - , 7' ! - ' . ,
■,. • 1; _ !!I 3248S AP 9376 i %
BP
1 1 ii
I
,,‘ ,.- 912 1
;1 /.■ 7
. • • ..,
AP . ,„ ' 9/93 I - % 933 9 / -
., • $1 • 1 T ' I . 9159 9376
• CE%rErt: ".■ 9/80
A-ee_ 17..
1
L.S.-11; ' \ 11 r. A•vr----- I 1- _.-;. \ --:
• , , = -AP- s /
AP-I9 ".„, 29 fa , , , ' , 12.
., „9.38 8 •
2 AP - I6
9260 ,
nvqr■r•A48
AP-I5
• : - ' - -
. 920 6
, •-,..:\ ' ri -7, '. A
, .... 41111.: AP-30 •; . 1 ! 1 '' 3;1 Ed. ' , - ! ' ' I - , .9 .38.3 -
P8
.3 2 H
.: , , - , . :-.T..1-1 . ._ 1: 'I ..: r." 1 ,
2.2L.,
' )4/ /1 '7
.^.
. 4t
., . 0i.05 I COUNTY PAM., LP-59
893.3
.....41A-rY 900.0 ■
LP-
., 887
•,.„1 897
-4'
A-aa
LP-I
;.:/// 1
• f' APPLE VALLEY 1----"---77-71
1 I
approved:
FIG. 4
standard
plate 4:
APC Minutes
March 22, 1988
WHISPERING WOODS 4TH ADDITION
REZONING, VARIANCE & PRELIMINARY PLAT
Chairman Pawlenty convened the public hearing in regard to the
applications of Burnsville Lumber for a preliminary plat of 27.7 A
(Agricultural) acres and rezoning of 5.7 acres within the area, to
an R -1 (Single Family) district for the Whispering Woods 4th
Addition. Mr. Sturm indicated the development will ultimately
consist of 57 lots on the 27.7 acres with the first phase containing
fourteen lots on the 5.7 R -1 zoned land. Subsequent rezonings and
final plat would be required as development occurred on the balance
of the parcel proposed in the preliminary plat. He advised that the
proposal was in conformance with the City's most recent land use
plan and in accord with the subdivision requirements, except that a
variance was requested for a 10 foot front yard setback for Lot 2
through 5, Block 4, and 20 foot front yard setbacks along Slater
Road for Lots 23 and 25, Block 2, and Lots 11 and 12, Block 4.
The developer proposed to avoid rezoning the balance of the
property to prevent a change in the real estate tax rate prior to
actual development.
Mr. Scott Hilla with the engineer for Burnsville Lumber, Dick
Digatna, were present and provided a topographical model of the area
and explained the reasons for the needed variance.
Linda Felker, 2252 James Street, expressed concern in regard to
the pond adjacent to her lot and the possibility of flooding
thereof. Mr. Colbert indicated that the final storm sewer plan will
address that issue and be designed to prevent such flooding.
Mr. Jim Allen of the Riverwoods Homes in Burnsville, questioned
whether a screening and a visual area would be provided for the town
homes to the west.
Douglas Holtberg, 2243 James Street suggested that there would
be a run -off problem with this much development on the steep
terrain. Mr. Colbert indicated that there would be no drainage down
James Street from this development.
Mr. Miller questioned whether the developer would not want to
screen the single family homes from the town homes to the west. Mr.
Hilla said yes, the developer would and would try to leave the
backyards of the residential homes natural for that reason.
In response to Mr. Merkley's concerns, Mr. Sturm indicated that
the balance of the property not being zoned at the time of final
plat would be in outlots.
APC Minutes
March 22, 1988
Mr. Colbert indicated that requiring a preliminary plat for the
overall parcel assured good planning and sound development,
including a overall grading and street plan. He noted that future
final plats would not have to be brought before the Planning
Commission, although the rezoning would have to be.
Mr. Pawlenty then questioned the variance for the 30 foot wide
frontage on Lot 25. Mr. Hilla pointed out that the lot also has a
90 foot frontage on Slater's Road which is too steep to allow for
access. Therefore, the 30 foot wide access was being proposed to
the south.
Mr. Merkley questioned whether the staff had adequate plans to
make a recommendation. Mr. Hilla indicated a storm sewer plan had
been submitted the previous day and that the grading plan for the
5.7 acres was available. Mr. Colbert indicated that detailed
grading plans would be required with future phases. He also assured
the Commission that no buildable lots would be created without
careful review.
Mr. Colbert advised Mr. Pawlenty that one of the rationales for
a 50 foot minimum front for residential lots is to minimize the
number of driveways along a street and allow for snow storage. In
the particular location, the 30 foot variance would not affect the
snow storage situation.
Merkley moved, Trygg seconded the motion to recommend rezoning
of 5.7 acres from A (Agricultural) to R -1 (Single Family). All
voted in favor.
Merkley moved, Garry seconded the motion to recommend approval
of the preliminary plat, consisting of 27.7 acres'of which 5.7 would
be platted into individual lots and balance into outlots. The
preliminary plat shall be subject to the following conditions:
1. This development shall accept its additional assessment
obligations as defined in the staff's report in accordance with the
final plat dimensions and the rates in effect at the time of final
plat approval.
2. This development shall dedicate 10 foot drainage and utility
easements centered over all common lot lines and adjacent to private
property or public right -of -way.
3. This development shall dedicate, provide, or financially
guarantee its proportionate share of the acquisition costs of
additional drainage, ponding, and utility easements as required by
the alignment, depth, and storage capacity of all required public
utilities and streets located beyond the boundaries of this plat or
outside of dedicated public right -of -way as necessary to service
this development.
APC Minutes
March 22, 1988
4. This development shall dedicate all public right -of -way and
temporary slope easements for ultimate development of adjacent
roadways as required by the appropriate jurisdictional agency.
5. This development shall dedicate adequate drainage and
ponding easements to incorporate the required high water elevation
necessitated by City storm water storage volume requirements.
6. All public streets and utilities necessary to provide
service to this development shall be designed by a registered
professional engineer in accordance with City codes and engineering
standards and policies, and approved by staff prior to final plat
approval.
7. A detailed grading, drainage, erosion, and sediment control
plan must be prepared in accordance with current City standards and
approved by staff prior to final plat approval.
8. All internal public and private streets shall be constructed
within the required right -of -way in accordance with City design
standards.
9. If any public improvements are to be installed under a City
contract, the appropriate project must be approved by Council action
prior to final plat approval.
10. This development shall be responsible for the acquisition
of all regulatory agency permits in the time frame required by the
affected agency.
11. This development shall fulfill its parks dedication
requirements as recommended by the Advisory Parks and Recreation
Commission and approved by Council action.
12. All standard platting and zoning conditions shall be
adhered to unless specifically granted a variance by Council action.
13. Subsequent rezonings to R -1 districts shall be required
with each phase of development prior to the preparation of the final
plats.
14. The variances as listed in the staff report shall be
approved.
15. Lot 24, Block 2, shall have a southerly access with 30 feet
at the street right -of -way line.
16. There will be no access from Lot 24 onto Slater's Road.
All voted in favor.
Agenda Information Memo
April 5, 1988, City Council Meeting
ORDINANCE AMENDMENT /SECTION 13.30
I. Ordinance Amendment, to Section 13.30, Subdivision 1 and 2 of
City's Code Chapter 13, Subdivision Regulations -- Recently, the
City staff spent several work sessions overhauling internal
procedures that would insure a more comprehensive review process
by all City departments for development applications. This
procedure is in response to the City Council's theme to improve
new development standards by assuring greater quality. This
information was shared by the City Administrator with the City
Council as a handout prior to a special workshop session that was
held to discuss quality indicators and new development standards.
Once staff concluded their findings and recommended some
procedural changes, it became necessary to amend the subdivision
ordinance to include these revisions for Planning Commission and
Council consideration. Enclosed on pages / _;.S through /(o O is a
copy of the proposed ordinance amendment. A copy of a letter
from J.E. Parranto Associates, Inc., that was distributed at the
Planning Commission meeting is enclosed on pages /67/ through
The minutes, on page f(p . , reflect the Planning
Commission's recommendation that the item be referred to the
Developers Task Force for their review and input. It is the
Planning Commission's recommendation that this take place
immediately and that the Developer's Task Force recommendation be
returned as soon as possible.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To 1) approve or deny an
ordinance amendment to Section 13.30, Subdivision 1 and 2 of the
Eagan "Subdivision Regulations" chapter of the City Code or 2)
activate the Developers Task Force to study this issue and make a
recommendation to the City Council prior to a final decision on
the amendment.
�s�
Attached is a preliminary redraft of Section 13.30 Subdivision 1 & 2 of the
Eagan "Subdivision Regulations." This pertains to information required with
the submittal of a "preliminary plat" and was prepared from checklist
information prepared by the Parks, Planning & Engineering Departments.
The revised Ordinance is divided into four categories:
CITY OF EAGAN 3/16/88
Identification & description
Existing conditions on proposed Subdivision land
Existing conditions on adjacent land
Design features of the proposal plat
This is intended for review to insure that each department's concerns are
addressed in the proposed redraft of this section of Ordinance.
1 S
SECTION 13.30 SUBD. 2A
Subd. 2. Preliminary Plat - A preliminary plat shall contain the following:
A. Identification and Description
1. Proposed name of subdivision, which name shall not
duplicate or be similar to the name of any other plat. The
use of the word "estate" shall only be permitted if the
property is zoned "estate ".
2. Vicinity map illustrating general location.
3. Names, addresses & telephone numbers of Owner, Developer,
Surveyor, and /or Engineer and contact person.
4. North point.
5. Date of preparation.
6. Graphic scale of 1" = 50' or 100'.
7. Sheet size of 22" x 34" or 24" x 36 ".
8. Bench mark.
9. Certificate of boundary survey by a Land Surveyor
registered in Minnesota.
10. Title opinion due to unusual or unique circumstances or as
may be required by the City.
11. Legal description of boundary of proposed plat.
B. Existing Conditions on Proposed Subdivision Land
1. Boundary line of proposed subidivision clearly indicated.
2. Exceptions to the proposed subdivision.
3. Existing zoning.
4. Total acreage.
5. Location, widths and names of all existing or previously
platted streets or other public way, showing type, width,
and also conditions of improvements.
6. Topographic data, including contours at vertical intervals
of not more than 2'.
7. All elevations, topography and vertical control data shall
be tied to sea level datum, 1929 General Adjustments.
8. Rock outcrops, power transmission lines and poles, and
other significant features not listed shall be shown.
9. Location, dimensions and purpose of any existing easements
(public or private) within the area to be subdivided,
directly abutting or within 200'.
10. Grades, invert elevations and locations of catch basins,
manholes and hydrants of any utilities located upon or
within 100' of the proposed subdivision.
11. Location, dimensions, acreage and purpose of any existing
publicly dedicated land surrounded by, directly abutting,
or within 200' of the proposed subdivision.
12. Location, condition, purpose and easement for any public
and private trails or sidewalks existing upon, abutting or
within 200'.
13. Location, condition and purpose of any existing water wells
and /or septic systems.
14. Location, condition, purpose, disposition, address and
floor elevations of any existing structures.
15. Tax parcel numbers for each existing parcel of record.
16. Location, size, species and general condition of any trees,
tree massing or other existing significant landscape
features.
17. Location and condition of any areas where significant
erosion has occurred.
18. Location and condition of existing ponds, wetlands, lakes,
streams or marshes with data for normal water elevation,
normal high water elevation, 100 year storm elevation, area
of drainage boundaries, and direction,of flow.
C. Existing Conditions on Adjacent Land
1. The following information shall be provided for a distance
of 200' surrounding the boundary of the area to be
subdivided:
a. Zoning.
b. Tax parcel numbers for unplatted property.
c. Identification of platted property by names of plat,
lots and blocks.
d. Name of property owner(s), except for platted single
family lots, shall be shown on the preliminary plat.
e. Location, widths and names of all existing and /or
dedicated public streets and condition of improvement.
f. Easements as required by Section 13.30, Subd. 2, B9.
g. Trails and sidewalks as required by Section 13.30,
Subd. 2, B 12.
h. Section lines and corners.
i. Ponds, wetlands, lakes, streams or marshes as required
in Section 13.30, Subd. 2, B 18.
j. Public lands as required by Section 13.30, Subd. 2, B
11.
2. The following information shall be provided for a distance
of 100' -200' surrounding the boundary of the area to be
subdivided:
a. Topographic data, including contours as required in
Section 13.30, Subd. 2, B 6.
b. Existing structures as required in Section 13.30, Subd.
2, B 14.
c. Utility information as required in Section 13.30, Subd.
2, B 10.
4 (5q
D. Design Fea of Proposed Subdivision
1. Proposed zoning if different from existing zoning.
2. Tract boundary lines, right-of-wy lines of streets,
easements and other rights -of -way and property lines of
lots and other sites. Location, dimension and purposes of
any easements.
3. An identification system for all lots and blocks.
4. Minimum front building setback line on all lots and other
sites with the width of lot shown at the minimum front
setback line. This may be shown by typical detail for
single family development.
5. Proposed contours at 2' intervals to mean sea level datum
(solid lines) to match existing contours.
6. Utility plans showing size of utility line, invert and top
of casting elevations, direction of flow arrows, hydrants
and gate valves and service locations.
7. Public streets showing right -of -way widths, paved streeet
widths and paved radii.
8. Public street grades with centerline elevations and percent
of grade every 100'.
9. Public street names consistent with existing street names
in City or proposed names shall be shown in alpha
designation until approved by the City's Community
Development Department.
10. Proposed private water well and /or septic system locations
with sufficient soil and percolation data for analysis of
suitability by City engineer.
11. Location and finish floor elevations of any existing
structures to remain after property is platted.
12. Finish floor elevations of proposed structure(s) on each
proposed lot.
13. Lot data showing largest lot, smallest lot, average lot and
median lot as categorized by zoning district (use).
14. Projected traffic information for internal or abutting
streets related to average daily trips (ADT) and A.M. and
P.M. peak hour.
15. Limits of clearing and grading.
16. Location of areas to be seeded and /or sodded.
17. Location, type, size, root type, quantities and species of
plant material to be planted as a part of the platting and
corresponding improvement process.
18. Location, type, grade and proposed improvement of public or
private trails.
19. Location, type and size of parkland proposed to be
dedicated for public use.
20. Detail improvements within parkland dedication area, i.e.
utilities, grading, restoration.
21. Provide acreage analysis of proposed parkland dediccation
as related to applicable Parkland Dedication Policy and
Ordinances of the City.
22. Identify any areas where finished grades will exceed 12%
slope.
23. Identify any area where existing water courses or
elevations as required by Section 13.30, Subd. 2 B 18, will
be altered.
24. Provide as applicable structural erosion /sediment control
locations (hay bale, silt fence, sedimentation basin).
25. A letter should accompany submittal of the preliminary plat
stating person /company responsible for erosion and sediment
control plan preparation, implementation and maintenance.
26. Affidavit of Comprehensive Plan review shall be provided by
owner /developer petitioning for approval of the preliminary
plat.
J.E.
I
ssociates inc.
Commercial and Industrial Realtors Appraisals Real Estate Development
The Advisory Planning Commission
City of Eagan
3830 Pilot Knob Road
P. 0. Box 21199
Eagan, Minnesota 55121
Ladies and Gentlemen:
March 22. 1988
You have before you tonight a proposal to revise Section
13.30 of the Eagan Subdivision Regulations. This proposal
revises the information required in order to submit a
preliminary plat.
I have inquired previously as to the changes being made
which were published in the newspapers for tonight's
hearing. I was unable to obtain a copy of the proposed
design features until Friday morning, March 18. This
allowed two days for the information to be made public and
an analysis of its impact upon the development community to
be determined. Obviously, this is an extremely short period
of time which did not allow me to fully analyze the impact
of the proposed revision upon the development process.
I would like to, however, highlight several changes which
appear to be quite drastic.
A. Identification and Description
10. Title opinion due to unusual or'unique
circumstances or as may be required by the City,
It is beyond me why the City should require a
title opinion as to the ownership of property as
a part of the platting process.
B. Existing Conditions on Proposed Subdivision Land
9. Location, dimensions and purpose of any existing
easements (public or private) within the area to be
subdivided, directly abutting or within 200 feet.
This change increases the basic requirements from
a 100 foot area abutting the property to 200
3!OQ Ceclarva P..t "e w FR.ra -t Minrecoto a 5517 " ( g19 1 A .1gOn
March 22, 1988
The Advisory Planning Commission
Page 2
feet. In addition, it requires that the
developer guess as to the purpose of an existing
easement and hopefully, that he knows of an
existing, private easement. If the City staff
knows what is within 100 feet adjacent to the
proposed plat, I fail to understand what
advantage will be gained in increasing that to
200 feet.
11. Location, dimensions, acreage and purpose of any
existing publicly dedicated land surrounded by,
directly abutting, or within 200 feet of the proposed
subdivision.
12. Location, condition, purpose and eaement for any
public and private trails or sidewalks existing upon,
aubtting or within 200 feet.
The above information is located in the plat book
which is maintained by the City. The only
advantage, that I can see, is that the City staff
will have it all on one map and will not have to
look at their own information to determine the
location and condition of a sidewalk or park
land.
16. Location, size, species and general condition of
any trees, tree massing or other existing significant
landscape features.
While this would be fascinating information,
basically it has little, if anything, to do with
the design of the plat. The mapping of trees,
especially in a wooded area, will cost many
thousands of dollars. It is entirely conceivable
that this map alone will cost more than the
entire process of preparing a preliminary plat as
practiced today.
C. Existing Conditions on Adjacent Land
2. The following information shall be provided for a
distance of 100 to 200 feet surrounding the boundary
of the area to be subdivided:
a. Topographic data, including contours as
rquired in Section 13.30, Subd. 2, B 6.
b. Existing structures as required in Section
13.30, Subd. 2, B 14.
c. Utility information as required in Section
13.30, Subd. 2, B 10.
March 22, 1988
The Advisory Planning Commission
Page 3
All of Paragraph 2, a., b. and c. require
information on surrounding property. The
items include topograhic data, existing
structures including floor elevations and the
utilities including invert locations, manhole
locations, hydrants, etc. for up to 200 feet
away from the property. This will require
that the plat does an onsite, topographic
mapping of adjacent, developed properties
including trespass on the adjacent
properties. In addition, there is no way
from existing records, short of trespass, to
obtain floor elevations of adjacent
properties.
The current requirements to tie into the
existing, adjacent conditions, and showing
those conditions as the tie -in point, is
quite sufficent to allow the development of a
parcel. To require that a developer trespass
on adjacent properties and provide
information on finished grades which is not
available without trespass, is absurd on the
face of it.
D. Design Features of Proposed Subdivision
6. Utility plans showing size of utility line,
invert and top of casting elevations, direction of
flow arrows, hydrants and gate valves and service
locations.
Essentially, this is a utility plan for the
subdivision. This is an extremely expensive plan
and will serve no purpose for preliminary plat
purposes.
7. Public streets showing right -of -way widths, paved
street widths and paved radii.
8. Public street grades with centerline elevations
and percent of grade every 100 feet.
Essentially, the above two items are the final
street plan. Again, the grading plan, prepared
for the preliminary plat, will show sufficient
detail to know that the street will work within
the engineering requirements of the City. There
is no reason for requiring the final street plans
with a preliminary plat.
March 22, 1988
The Advisory Planning Commission
Page 4
The above three items essentially are the utility
and street plans which would be drawn for the
final plat. The cost of producing these plans
will vary dramatically with the size of the plat.
It is our experience that it will not be unusual
to see a bill for $20,000 or more for these plans
which you propose to be used for a preliminary
plat.
14. Projected traffic information for internal or
abutting streets related to average daily trips (ADT)
and A.M. and P.M. peak hour.
The question arises as to when the projection is
made for, meaning which year and prior to, or
immediately after, the plat is put in place and
what must be accounted for in projecting abutting
streets, especially if those streets are
collector streets. It would seem that this is
definitely beyond the approval of a normal
preliminary platting process. It may, however,
speak directly to the requirements of a
specialized, intense commercial or industrial use
plat.
26. Affidavit of Comprehensive Plan Review shall be
provided by owner /developer petitioning for approval
of the preliminary plat.
I don't know what an Affidavit of Comprehensive
Plan Review is; however, it sounds like an
additional hearing before one of the City bodies.
This short analysis is based upon a cursory review of your
proposed subdivision ordinance. It appears that it is
designed to require as much as possible, in terms of
information, from 3 k'developer proposing to do any work in
the city of Eagan. While on certain occasions some of the
information may be desirable, it is highly doubtful that it
is rquired in all occasions.
The City had, at one time, a developer's task force which
reviewed proposals such as the proposal currently before
you. It is my opinion that it is highly unfair to make such
proposal and allow the public two days to absorb the
information in order to analyze its impact and determine its
necessity to the City. I would urge you, therefore, to
delay any action on the proposed subdivision ordinance
revisions until the public has a chance to react properly.
March 22, 1988
The Advisory Planning Commission
Page 5
In addition, it should be submitted to the developer's task
force if the same is still available or, at least, to a
committee of persons who could work with the staff to insure
that the ordinance meets the requirements of the staff and
the feasibility of the developer to provide the requested
information.
Sincerely,
Mark S. Parranto
MSP /sah
APC Minutes
March 22, 1988
Merkley moved, Miller seconded the motion to recommend approval
of a variance for a 30 foot frontage on Lot 24 and for a setback
variances for Lots 2, 3, 4, 5, 11, and 12, in Block 4, and Lots 23
and 25 of Block 2. All voted in favor except Voracek who voted no,
because in his opinion it appeared that the conditions of the
preliminary plat already included the variance.
ORDINANCE AMENDMENT
The final hearing of the evening was convened in regard to the
proposed subdivision ordinance amendment from the City staff. Mr.
Runkle indicated that input had been received from all departments
but that no public input had been received at this point. Mr. Mark
Parranto, an Eagan resident and owner of Delta Development, the
developer for Stafford Place, appeared and indicated concerns about
several of the proposed additions to the requirements for land
developers in subdividing property. He provided copies of a letter
dated March 22, 1988 addressing some of these problems. He stated
that the proposal created severe problems for residential developers
and that it would require complete engineering at the preliminary
plat stage.
Another example would be the requirement for a census of trees
on the property which would be very costly in heavily wooded
subdivisions and result in the inability to subdivide. He also
requested that the item be submitted to the Developer's Task Force.
Member Trygg questioned whether the Planning Commission could
make such a recommendation which Mr. Runkle said was possible. Mr.
Colbert pointed out that Mr. Parranto had made valid comments but
expressed concern that staff was in need of these types of
regulations to control improvements to property in Eagan.
Mr. Garry suggested that the additional restrictions may make it
impossible for a small developer to proceed.
Trygg moved, Voracek seconded the motion to recommend that the
Developer's Task Force be convened to address this issue as soon as
possible. All voted yes.
It was recommended this item be heard by City Council on April
5, 1988.
ADJOURNMENT
Voracek moved, Merkley seconded the motion to adjourn at 9:45
p.m. All voted in favor.
Secretary - APC
12
DGK
Agenda Information Memo
April 5, 1988, City Council Meeting
A. PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT CONTRACTS:
ADDITIONAL: 'ITEMS
CONTRACT 88 -11, APPROVE PLANS /AUTHORIZE BIDS
1. Contract 88 -11, Approve Plans /Authorize Bids (Woodlands
Addition and Hurley Lake Storm Sewer Lift Station) - -As a part
of the Woodlands Addition Development adjacent to South Hills
north of Wescott Road, it is necessary to install a trunk storm
sewer lift station to handle the anticipated future runoff from
this and adjacent developments. Also, as a result of the
analysis of the storm sewer system after the July, 1987 "Super
Storm ", it is recommended that the Hurley Lake storm sewer lift
station be upgraded to its ultimate capacity necessary to handle
the additional drainage generated from the upstream developments
east on Wescott Road.
These plans have now been completed and are being presented to
the Council for review and consideration of authorization to
advertise for formal bid solicitations. The Public Works
Department has reviewed these plans and found them to be in order
for favorable Council action.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the plans for
Contract 88 -11 (Woodlands Addition and Hurley Lake -Storm Sewer
Lift Stations) and authorize the advertisement for bid opening to
be held at 10:45 a.m., Thursday, April 14, 1988.
VEHICLE #144, RECEIVE BIDS /AWARD CONTRACT
2. Vehicle #144, Receive Bids /Award Contract (Public Works Front
End Loader) - -At 10:00 a.m. on Friday, March 25th, formal bids
were received for the purchase of a new front end loader for the
Public Works Street Maintenance Division in ccordance with the
approved 1988 budget. Enclosed on page (LX is a tabulation of
the bids received with an analysis of the low bid to the approved
1988 budget. The low bidder will be evaluated for conformance to
the specifications and a formal recommendation will be provided
at the April 5th Council meeting.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To receive the bids for
vehicle #144 (Public Works front end loader) and authorize the
purchase from the lowest responsible bidder.
I
Carlson Tractor
Nick Gillen Sales
PTS oN
Case Power
& Equipment
{
3056 R51.213
MR oN JsIITda4e + p ! s?IIV q-sT3
i
$110,796.00 $139,991.00
-0- $ 4,500.00
No Charge
00'000`Z9 $
Oz•9L0`c $
�I I
f r
$114,710.10 $ 85,567.20
60 - 90 days 1 90 - 120 days
i 1
Borchert Ziegler Inc.
Ingersoll
ON
0rtt.6`c $
Carlson Lake
State Equip.
John Deere
644 E
0 6C'Lt.6 $
000`c $
ON
$ 3,954
iii 't7zt -$
60 - 90 days
s2IaaaIg
1. Make /Model
2. Base Bid
( +) 3. Guar. Mtce.
Cost
( -) 4. Guaranteed
Repurchase
( +) 5. Scheduled
Mtce. Cost
6. Total Cost
Bid
aq.eu
£JeATIeG •L
cc
co
1988 Budget (Equipment Certificate) $145,000
BID TABULATION
Agenda Information Memo
April 5, 1988, City Council Meeting
ItOM 3. Public Works Maintenance Facility, Receive Bids /Award
Contract (Salt Storage Facility) - -In a continuing effort to
receive better bids in line with the approved 1988 budget, a
formal bid opening was held at 10:00 a.m. on Friday, April 1st
for the construction of a salt storage building on the Public
Works Maintenance Facility property. Enclosed on page * is a
copy of the bid tabulation with an analysis of the lowest bid to
the approved 1987 budget allocation which was authorized to be
extended into 1988 for this new solicitation. An evaluation of
the low bidder regarding conformance to the specifications will
be performed with the recommendation being provided at the April
5th Council meeting.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To receive the bids for
the Public Works Maintenance Building (Salt Storage Facility) and
award the contract to the lowest responsible bidder.
Special Note: The bid tabulation will be distributed with the
additional information memo as a part of the administrative
packet on April 4th.
Agenda Information Memo
April 5, 1988, City Council Meeting
CONTRACT 88 -19 /WELL #5 /AUTHORIZE BIDS
4. Contract 88 -19, Approve Plans and Specifications /Authorize Ad
For Bids, Well #5 Pump Repair -- Detailed plans and specifications
have been completed and are being presented to the City Council
for consideration of authorizing advertisement for solicitation
of competitive bids to perform the necessary repairs to existing
Well #5.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the plans and
specifications for Contract 88 -19 (Well #5 Pump Repair) and
authorize the advertisement for a bid opening to be held April
18, 1988, at 10:00 a.m.
5. Contract 87 -11, Approve Change Order #2 (Greensboro 2nd
Addition) -- Change Order #2 provides payment to the contractor for
clearing and grubbing the storm sewer easement areas that were
outside the developer's grading limits.
Part of the work of this contract consisted of constructing storm
sewer lines through wooded easement areas. Prior to the
installation of the storm sewer, the easement areas required
clearing and grubbing of the wooded areas. This item was
included in the specifications but was inadvertently omitted from
the bid proposal. All costs associated with this Change Order
will be the responsibility of the Greensboror 2nd Addition under
the Development Contract Agreement. The total amount of this
Change Order is $6,950.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve Change Order #2
for Contract 87 -11 (Greensboro 2nd Addition - Utility & Street
Improvements) and authorize the Mayor & City Clerk to execute all
related documents.
6. Contract 87 -17 Approve Change Order #1 (Blackhawk Road
Utility & Street Improvements) - -The work proposed under Change
Order #1 consists of four parts.
A. Due to the fact that the majority of the easements
necessary to construct this project were obtained after
the contract was bid, during the process of
negotiation to obtain the easements, a number of work
items were offered to the property owners as partial
compensation for the easements. These items included
relocating a number of 20' -30' high pine trees and
approximately 15 miscellaneous small trees and shrubs,
extending the slope on the east side of Blackhawk Road
into Parcel 040 -75 at a 4:1 slope rather than at a 3:1
slope as originally planned, and add one additional
catch basin with a lead to prevent flooding of a
private driveway and garage. The total amount of Part
A is $5,554.80.
Agenda Information Memo
April 5, 1988, City Council Meeting
B. During the excavation to install a storm sewer line, it
was determined that conflicts with existing gas mains
would not allow the installation of a planned 15" RCP
line. A 14" DIP line was installed in place of the
proposed 15" RCP line. The total amount of Part B is
$855.
C. Part C provides for construction of a water truck
filling station in Carnelian Park. The Parks
Department requested that a water truck filling station
be installed for use in maintaining the ice rinks in
the area. The water filling station construction
consisted of a standard fire hydrant, a 6" DIP water
main lead to the existing water main and removing and
patching a portion of the road. The total amount of
Part C is $2,120.80.
D. The portion of the work described under Part D was
necessary in order to install the curb and gutter to
the new roadway alignment at the intersection of
Blackhawk Road and Diffley Road. The removal and
relocation of the existing catch basins at this
location was not included in the original bid. The
total amount of Part D is $2,120.80.
The total amount of the proposed Change Order #1 adds $11,092.60
to the original contract amount.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To Approve Change Order #1
for Contract 87 -17, Blackhawk Road (Utility & Street
Improvements) and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute
all related documents.
7. Contract 87 -36, Approve Change Order #1, Whispering Woods
2nd Addition -- Contract 87 -36 in part consisted of the
construction of storm sewer. The proposed storm sewer crossed an
existing water main which was installed under a previous MnDot
contract. Normal installation depth for water main is at
approximately 7'. At this condition, the proposed gravity storm
sewer and the existing water main were not in conflict. However,
the water main was buried to a 14' depth and this resulted in a
grade conflict. To resolve the grade conflict, the water main
had to be relocated. This is extra work as defined in the
conditions of the contract and the contracter is therefore
entitled to compensation for the cost of doing the work. The
total amount of this Change Order is $3,104.56.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To Approve Change Order #1
for Contract 87 -36, Whispering Woods 2nd Addition (Storm Sewer)
and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute all related
documents.
Agenda Information Memo
April 5, 1988, City Council Meeting
Item B. Contract 87 - 24, Approve Change Order #3, Stafford
Place /Northview Park Road (Trunk Utilities) - -This Change Order
provides for the construction of storm sewer pipe and catch
basins at Wescott Avenue and Northview Park Road street entrances
to the proposed Bridle Ridge 2nd Addition. The proposed Bridle
Ridge 2nd Addition received a favorable recommendation from the
Advisory Planning Commission on March 24, 1988. The Preliminary
Plat for the Bridle Ridge 2nd Addition is scheduled for the April
19 City Council meeting.
Due to the fact that the proposed Bridle Ridge 2nd Addition is a
recently planned development, its development plan (and therefore
the location and design details of the street entrances to
Wescott Road) were not available during the planning of City
Project #498A. Therefore, the installation of the intersection
storm sewer was not included in the work of these construction
contracts.
Proper construction sequence requires the storm work to be
completed before the final paving of the wear course of Wescott
Road and Northview Park Road which is currently being bid under
Contract #88 -3. A Change Order to Contract 87 -24 is the most
feasible means of accomplishing this work within the necessary
time frame.
The project is, by City policy, to be financed by special
assessment against the benefitting properties, Bridle Ridge 2nd
Addition. The total amount of this Change Order is $13,929.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve Change Order #3
for Contract 87 -24 (Stafford Place /Northview Park Road - Trunk
Utilities), contingent upon the approval of the proposed
Preliminary Plat for Bridle Ridge 2nd Addition to be considered
at the April 19, 1988, City Council meeting, and authorize the
Mayor and City Clerk to execute all related documents.
9. Contract 86 -E, Final Acceptance, LeMay Lake Hills Utility &
Street Improvements - -This project provided for the installation
of sanitary sewer, water main, streets and storm sewer facilities
associated with the development of the LeMay Lake Hills
development located south of Lone Oak Road east of Pilot Knob
Road and north of Towerview Road. All work has been completed in
accordance with City approved plans and specifications and is in
order for formal acceptance of perpetual City maintenance.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To accept Contract 86 -E
(LeMay Lake Hills - Utility & Street Improvements) for perpetual
maintenance by the City.
Agenda Information Memo
April 5, 1988, City Council Meeting
10. Grading Permit EX-29-068, Cliff Lake Centre--As a condition
of the Preliminary Plat approval of the Cliff Lake Centre project
at the December 1, 1987, City Council meeting, Council directed
staff to forward the approval of the grading permit to Council
for their review and approval /denial. Staff has reviewed the
grading, drainage and erosion control plan for the proposed Cliff
Lake Centre. The development has substantially complied with
City permit requirements necessary for administratively issuing a
grading permit for the project.
The comment period for the Indirect Source Permit (ISP 88 -3) does
not end until April 18, 1988. A grading permit cannot be issued
until the Indirect Source Permit has been issued. Additional
information concerning the Indirect Source Permit and the
proposed Landscape Plan will be provided with the Administrative
Agenda.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To authorize staff to
administratively issue the site grading permit (EX -29 -068) for
the Cliff Lake Centre project contingent upon the issuance of the
Indirect Source Permit (ISP 88 -3).
1 '1,3
MEMO TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCILMEMBERS
FROM: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES
DATE: MARCH 28, 1988
SUBJECT: INFORMATIVE
PILOT KNOB ROAD /CLIFF ROAD IMPROVEMENTS
The City is suggesting to the Dakota County Highway Department
that various public informational meetings be sponsored by the
County with interested property owners and, in particular,
businesses that may be affected by the detour and road closures
associated with both the Pilot Knob Road, Diffley Road and Cliff
Road projects. The Director of Public Works will be notified
when these meetings are to occur during the next several weeks.
AIRPORT /4 - 22 RUNWAY ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT SUMMARY
Enclosed without page number is a copy of a report that was
prepared by consultants for the Metropolitan Airports Commission
entitled MSP 4 -22 Environmental Assessment Summary. A public
informational meeting was held on Wednesday, March 23, 1988, at
Pilot Knob Elementary School, to consider the extension of Runway
4 -22. In attendance were City Councilmember Egan, Administrative
Assistant Hohenstein and for a portion of the meeting, the City
Administrator. If members of the City Council have any concerns
about what is printed in the attached report, please share them
at the City Council meeting on Tuesday and those comments will be
forwarded to the Airport Relations Committee and Metropolitan
Airports Commission.
LEGISLATIVE UPDATE
Enclosed on pages 1 through is a copy of a legislative
update for weeks five and six. The most important bills
impacting cities are Property Tax Reform and Tax Increment
Financing. Also enclosed on page ( 9 is a memo from Mr. Bob
Renner, Jr., representing the Municipal Legislative Commission,
discussing the House Property Tax Proposal. Under this
legislation proposed by Gordon Voss, Chairman of the House Tax
Committee, the City of Eagan will receive no dollars in proposed
1988 LGA. Enclosed on pages *,g( is a copy of another memo from
Bob Renner and a sheet that outlines the City of Eagan's proposed
LGA. Essentially, all the MLC cities including Plymouth,
Shoreview, Woodbury, Burnsville, Roseville, Maplewood and Edina
would receive no dollars in LGA. The other cities such as
Bloomington would receive a $2.5 million decrease which in scope
is equivalent to receiving no LGA dollars. The City of
Minneapolis realizes a $1.2 million increase, while St. Paul
would increase from $3.7 million to $6 million under the Gordon
Voss proposal. The central cities and a variety of outstate
cities benefit by the House Omnibus Tax Bill while most suburban
communities are significant losers.
11 g'
METROPOLITAN COUNCIL UPDATE
At the last Dakota County Mayor /Manager Breakfast, Mayor Elision
and the City Administrator received an update from our
Metropolitan Council Representative, Mary Martin, on the various
priorities that were adopted by the Met Council as a part of
their planning process. Enclosed on pages l)----through 1 is a
copy of those priorities as they appear in 'a brochure t at was
referenced by Councilmember Martin.
NATIONAL LEAGUE OF CITIES UPDATE
Mayor Ellison and the City Administrator attended the National
League of Cities Legislative Conference on the weekend of March
19 - 22. The League of Minnesota Cities sponsored a meeting
regarding response to the National League of Cities priorities
prior to the conference. The opening speaker was Jim Wright,
Speaker of the House, who made an excellent presentation on the
future of cities. Mayor Ellison attended workshops on the fiscal
year 1989 budget cities and several meetings with legislative
officials. The City Administrator attended sessions on
Federalism and Reciprocal Immunity and Controlling Airport Noise:
Local Responsibility or Federal Prerogative. One of the speakers
at the airport noise session was a city councilmember from Long
Beach, California who stated that his city is currently being
sued by a citizens' group and 24 airlines for attempting to
impose some noise restrictions. He stated that the face value of
the lawsuits are in excess of $1.5 billion. The conference was
interesting and allowed our city an opportunity to make a number
of valuable contacts in Washington with our legislative
delegation, including not only legislators but legislative aides.
Also enclosed on pages `G O through `j is a copy of the NLC
statement entitled "Priorities for America's Cities and Towns."
DECISION RESOURCES EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Enclosed on pages (C I
-- through l� , for City Council review is
a copy of the executive summary of the Decision Resources' recent
survey.
FIRE DEPARTMENT
Enclosed on page \G 1 is a copy of the Fire Depa tment's monthly
report for February. Also enclosed on page is a copy of a
letter from the City of Apple Valley thanking our Fire Department
for their response and mutual aid to the City of Apple Valley for
a structure fire on March 4.
STAR CITY PROGRAM
The City Administrator and Administrative Assistant Hohenstein
prepared and presented to the Minnesota Department of Trade and
('1 S
Economic Development the necessary information for
recertification as a Minnesota Star City.
WORKERS COMPENSATION PREMIUM REFUND
The Director of Finance reviewed at the strategic planning
session on March 24 the risk management the City City implemented
for workers compensation. Enclosed on page (_ is a copy of a
memo prepared by the Director of Finance that outlines the
savings to date and were reviewed by Gene at our work session.
STATUS REPORT ON ASSISTED HOUSING COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
Enclosed on pages q O 0 through , Q 1 is a copy of the February
status report for all assisted housing programs and community
development programs currently being operated in our community
and the summary sheet for Dakota County. This information is
sent to the City on a regular basis by the Dakota County HRA.
/S/ Thomas L. Hedges
City Administrator
1 co
NUMBER 6, MARCH 18, 1988
MEMORANDUM
TO: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES AND DEPARTMENT HEADS
FROM: SUSAN
DATE: MARCH 23, 1988
SUBJECT: LEGISLATIVE UPDATE NUMBER 5 & NUMBER 6
NUMBER 5, MARCH 11, 1988
PROPERTY TAX REFORM
The governor's revenue forecasts for the next biennium do not
seem to be as positive as it'had seemed at one point. Because of
this costly proposals to the property tax system may have a
problem. Both the Governor's proposal and the proposal form the
Coalition of Greater MN Cities involve significant new costs to
the state from $100 to $150 million per year.
Major property tax reform funding is also competing with other
spending priorities. The House passed a bill to increase the gas
tax and transfer $71.6 million a year some the motor vehicle
excise tax (MVET) to the transportation fund. In addition,
increased spending for education is a popular item.
House Tax Committee Chair Voss and Senate Tax Committee Chair
Johnson are working independently on their own property tax
proposals, though neither have been revealed.
The Senate Tax Committee may shelve proposals which spend money
and instead propose more limited fine - tuning measures which may
include keeping the pay 1989 structure. Unlike the Senate, House
Tax Committee Chair Voss may pursue more costly property tax
reforms.
TAX INCREMENT FINANCING
House File 2262 would require tax increment districts to pay
schools for any new or increased millages that school district
residents vote for in a referendum. The requirement would be
effective for referendums that take place after enactment and
would apply to all tax increment districts, regardless of their
certification date.
TAX INCREMENT FINANCING
House File 1871 was sent on to the House Tax Committee in spite
of considerable testimony on the adverse impact of the proposal.
Reports from the committee indicate that the bill may be included
in the omnibus tax bill without further hearings. This would
make the bill very difficult to amend and would be almost certain
to become law.
Senate activity is less conclusive, though a number of
recommendations from city officials have been accepted by the
bill's author, Senator Reichgott. It is unsure if the bill will
become a counterweight to the House bill.
PROPERTY TAX REFORM
Preliminary information has been released concerning the proposal
from Representative Voss, however the final proposal has not yet
been released.
The proposed plan would make fundamental changes in the current
LGA program. It would place cities into four relatively
arbitrary groups: first class cities; all other metro cities;
non -metro cities over 1,000 population; and non -metro cities
under 1,000. A city's aid amount would depend to a large extent
on how its spending level compares to the average spending level
for the group. Three of these four groups are quite large and
contain cities with very diverse characteristics and with very
different spending needs. As a result, there is an extremely
wide variation in per capita spending within each of the groups.
The formula can thus yield aid increases or decreases that are
relatively arbitrary and unrelated to the city's actual spending
needs.
LC
MUNICIPAL
LEGISLATIVE
COMMISSION
M E M O R A N D U M
TO: MLC Board of Directors
FROM: Bob Renner, Jr.
RE: House Property Tax Proposal
DATE: March 22, 1988
1500 Northland Plaza
3800 West 80th Street
Bloomington, Minnesota 55431
(612) 893 -6650
The Chairman of the House Tax Committee, Gordon Voss, released
the House Omnibus Tax Bill draft on tlonday, tiarch 21. This
bill, which will be debated during the week by the Tax Committee
(and passed on Friday) provides $184 million of new property tax
relief over the next two years. A majority of this relief is
directed to the metropolitan area. Compared to current law,
$80.1 million of property tax relief will be provided in 1989;
$64.7 million will impact the metro area compared to $15.4
million for Greater Minnesota. In the metro area, $51.9 million
of property tax relief will be directed to metro suburbs and
towns, $5.6 million for Minneapolis, and $7.2 million for St.
Paul.
The majority of this property tax relief is due to an increase
in the homestead credit from 52% to 53% on a base market value
of $80,000 instead of $68,000. The $700 maximum homestead credit
is repealed by this bill.
A negative provision of the House bill is the alternative
minimum homestead credit which affects high income homeowners
(over $100,000) living in high valued homes (over $200,000
market value). It is estimated that this provision would affect
7,700 homeowners the first year.
A final note -- the "Voss Plan ", which was mailed to you in
March, has been shelved. This alternative, known as "Voss II ",
acknowledges the huge disparities between metro and non -metro
property taxes, and it attempts to correct this unfair policy.
The chairman has proposed a "suburban solution ". Support for
this legislation will help lower suburban property taxes in the
future.
I have enclosed a summary of the House Omnibus Bill compared to
the current law and compared to the law which is slated to go
into effect in 1989 if the Legislature does nothing this year.
Member Cities: Bloomington. Brooklyn Park. Burnsville. Eagan,
Eden Prairie. Edina, Inver Grove Heights. Maple Grove. Maplewood. Minnetonka.
Plymouth, Roseville. Shoreview. White Bear Lake. Woodbury
L n 1
MllNICIPAL
LEGISI.ATIC7E
COMMISSION
M E M O R A N D U M
TO: Members of the MLC Board of Directors
FROM: Bob Renner, Jr.
RE: House Tax Chairman's Property Tax Proposal
DATE: March 16, 1988
1500 Northland Plaza
3800 West 80th Street
Bloomington, Minnesota 55431
(612) 893 -6650
Please find enclosed an analysis of the LGA impact the "Voss
Plan" would have on MLC cities. These numbers have not yet been
made public. It's incredible to me that the House Tax Chairman
wants to increase the total pot for LGA from $297.4 million to
$331.1 million, a 11.3% increase, and at the same time reduce
LGA to MLC cities by $12.3 million, a 79.4% decrease. Note that
9 of our 15 cities will receive zero in local government aid at
the same time Minneapolis receives an $11.9 million increase
(19.5 %) and St. Paul an astounding increase of $22.8 million
(60.2 %).
A copy of the assumptions used for the House Alternative
Property Tax Plan is attached. Please note that the homestead
credit is retained at 50% of the gross property tax bill without
a maximum (but still limiting the eligible tax to the first
$68,000 of market value).
The interaction of the new classification systems, homestead
credit, and city and county equalization aid result in new
property tax levies that may not correlate directly to a loss or
increase in LGA. Therefore to provide you with a balanced
assessment, I have included in the final column a net mill rate
change when you net out city and county levy changes under the
Voss Plan. (School district levies are not addressed.) Even
using net mill rates (which shifts the argument from "good /bad
policies" to "good /bad numbers ") this program is still
detrimental to suburbs.
On a positive note, the concept of a "state support factor"
which attempts to aggregate cities by average spending habits
may be worth examining. Whether the dollar allocation is
correct can be debated, but the idea is worth pursuing.
Member Cities: Bloomington. Brooklyn Park. Burnsville. Eagan.
Eden Prairie. Edina. Inver Grove Heights. Maple Grove, Maplewood. Minnetonka.
Plymouth. Roseville. Shoreview. White Bear Lake. Woodbury
Jg0
1
HOUSE RESEARCH *
DEPARTMENT *
14 Mar 88 *
•
REGION
METRO HI-VALUE SUBURBS
CITY EQUALIZATION AID - LGA & LEVIES
HOUSE - 1988 - RUN 9b
CURREN PROPOSED
DIFFER- 1988 LEVY 198 1988
CLUSTER CURRENT PROPOSED ENCE CURRENT UNDER MILt MILLS
GROUP CITY 1988 LGA 1988 LGA IN LGA 1988 LEVY PROPOSAL 89 clas 89 class DIFF.
MENDOTA HEIGHT 228179 0 - 228179 1577820 1805999 7.06 8.08 1.02
MINNETONKA BEA 42276 10508 -31768 223397 255165 7.57 8.64 1.08
MINNETONKA C1T 1618945 138929 - 1480016 10504395 11984411 7.68 8.76 1.08
MINNETRISTA CI 198020 101390 -96630 701379 798009 7.95 9.04 1.10
NORTH OAKS CIT 4744 0 -4744 490012 494756 4.16 4.20 .04
OAK PARK HEIGH 99651 0 -99651 923731 1023382 6.97 7.72 .75
MONO CITY OF 165118 0 - 165118 1293426 1458544 5.24 5.90 .67
ROSEVILLE CITY 849606 0 - 849606 5000000 5849606 6.04 7.07 1.03
SHAKOPEE CITY 517124 0 - 517124 1738729 2255853 7.92 10.28 2.36
SHOREW000 CITY 160297 9733 - 150564 1293689 1444253 10.51 11.73 1.22
SPRING PARK CI 73845 29022 -44823 364266 409089 9.55 10.73 1.18
ST LOUIS PARK 2629062 1540399 - 1088663 7873230 8961893 7.90 9.00 1.09
SUNFISH LAKE C 6293 0 -6293 169899 176192 9.50 9.85 .35
TONKA BAY CITY 52029 916 -51113 339614 390727 6.94 7.99 1.04
WAYZATA CITY 0 149731 0 - 149731 1007800 1157531 6.59 7.57 .98
WOODLAND CITY 2807 0 -2807 126053 128860 4.12 4.21 .09
GROUP TOTALS 14806402 3664896 - 11141506 76767989 87909495 7.06 8.09
HI- GROWTH AREAS ANDOVER CITY 0 230653 463317 232664 995114 762450 6.91 5.29 -1.62
APPLE VALLEY C 841557 623398 - 218159 5731728 5949887 13.47 13.99 .51
BLAINE CITY OF 1321381 1199792 -121589 3369787 3491376 7.28 7.54 .26
.21205LYN PARK 2108673 1406160 - 702513 8010800 8713313 10.90 11.85 .96
BURNSVILLE CIT 1689722 0 - 1689722 9136911 10826633 9.79 11.60 1.81
CHAMPLIN CITY 393021 451529 58508 1887945 1829437 12.45 12.07 -.39
CHASKA CITY OF 334664 194941 - 139723 861050 1000773 5.96 6.93 .97
CORCORAN CITY 82359 97305 14946 557109 542163 7.69 7.49 -.21
COTTAGE GROVE 1244702 715863 - 528839 3356973 3885812 11.98 13.87 1.89
EAGAN CITY OF 333352 0 - 333352 7161540 7494892 9.57 10.01 .45
EAST BETHEL CI 131706 175113 43407 435726 392319 5.00 4.50 -.50
EDEN PRAIRIE C 324658 0 - 324658 7937200 8261858 9.08 9.45 .37
ELKO CITY OF 7893 17314 9421 52179 42758 16.27 13.33 -2.94
FOREST LAKE CI 434608 204500 - 230108 868406 1098514 10.17 12.87 2.70
HAM LAKE CITY 207619 342997 135378 623880 488502 5.75 4.50 -1.25
HUGO CITY OF 96116 65129 -30987 529290 560277 8.58 9.08 .50
INVER GROVE HT 707485 284631 - 422854 2979473 3402327 9.70 11.07 1.38
LAKE ELMO 017Y 119017 34492 -84525 557981 642506 5.63 6.49 .81'
LAKELAND SHORE 485 0 - 485 23250 23735 4.62 4.72 .10
LAKEVILLE CITY 631613 391962 - 239651 3601042 3840693 13.53 14.43 .90
LILYDALE CITY 611 0 - 611 66970 67581 3.02 3.04 .03
LINO LAKES CIT 232460 266337 33877 1146850 1112973 13.08 12.69 -.39
LITTLE CANADA 231056 0 - 231056 1275000 1506056 8.81 10.40 1.60
MAPLE GROVE CI 630283 461935 - 168348 5178398 5346746 10.67 11.01 .35
' CITY LISTING
•
• PAGE: 2
•
The Metropolitan Council couldn't function as
it does without the help of hundreds of arca
citizens. who take time to help it solve complex
problems by serving on various advisory com-
mittees. Advice and technical information are
supplied by many committees, subcommittees.
boards and task forces, on such subjects as solid
waste management, aging, the arts, transporta-
tion and minority issues.
The Council actively recruits members
through its own open appointment process.
which encourages people to volunteer or
nominate others for committee openings. Efforts
are made to ensure balanced committees that
reflect the population of the region as a whole,
as well as a variety of interests.
Individual citizens and organizations also have
an opportunity to be heard on important regional
issues by attending public meetings and
hearings.
To find out about committee openings, watch
for stories in local newspapers and call the
Council at 291 -6390 for more information. For
information about public meetings and hearings,
call 291 -6500.
The Metropolitan Council makes decisions
every day that affect the future of the region and
its citizens. The essential ingredient in making
those decisions is information —which the Coun-
cil also shares with others.
In 1986, the Metropolitan Council Data Center
was established to expand the Council's role as a
source of regional information. The data center
provides data from the U.S. Census and other
sources on a variety of topics, including popula-
tion, housing, retail sales and land use. Public
service information also is available at the data
center, in such forms as a regional parks map
and a consumer's guide to housing options for
older people. Much of the information is "ready
to go" in the data center's walk -in display area.
For questions that aren't answered in a publica-
tion, the data center staff can help people find
information in the Council's many data files and
its library. For information, call the data center
at 291 -6464. r
Another good source of regional news is the
Metro Monitor, the Council's newspaper. To be
added to the mailing list, call 291 -6465.
Publication No. 310 - 88-004
Getting Involved
Information, Please
CflTIZEN'
GUI E
to the
Metropolitan
Council
Quick Questions and Answers
What is the Metropolitan Council?
A regional planning and coordinating agency unique to the Twin Cities Area one of the very few governmental
agencies in the United States designed to deal effectively with the problems of an entire metropolitan area.
What does it do?
Plans for the future of the Twin Cities Metropolitan Area —all seven counties. 188 cities and towns, 3,000 square
miles and two - million -plus people. And, along with the metropolitan agencies. provides vital services to the area.
The Council meets the second and fourth Thursday afternoon of each month. Much of its deliberation is done
earlier, however, in meetings of standing and special committees. Information about meeting times and other
Council activities is available by calling 291 -6512.
What kind of planning and services?
The Council is authorized by state and federal laws to plan for the big regional systems— airports, parks, highways
and transit, and sewers--as well as for air and water quality. solid waste management, land use, aging, arts, health
and housing. The Council sets broad public policies for the four regional systems. In some cases special
metropolitan agencies carry those policies out. In other cases, the Council works with other units of government
and the private sector to help implement its policies.
What has the Council accomplished?
In 1987 the Council celebrated its 20th birthday, and in those two decades its planning has contributed to the area's
consistently high quality of life. For example, in 1975 the Council adopted a plan called the Metropolitan Develop-
ment Framework, which some observers have called the nation's most ambitious effort to manage urban growth. In
1986, the Council adopted a revised version of the development framework that reflects the challenges of a new
period in the region's history. The revised plan emphasizes wise management of the area's existing infrastructure,
including its highways and sewers.
In its early years, the Council was also successful in advocating that the legislature create a regional park system
and a single regional sewerage system. In both instances, a regional approach proved most effective in dealing
with metropolitan -wide problems: the need for more parks to meet the growing suburban demand, and inadequate-
ly treated sewage that was polluting the area's rivers and lakes. In recent years, the Council has tackled another
major environmental problem head -on: how to lessen the region's dependence on landfills for solid waste disposal.
The Council also has worked to make low- income rental housing available throughout the region, rather than just
in the central cities. As a result, the proportion of subsidized housing in the region has changed from 90 percent
in Minneapolis and St. Paul and 10 percent in the suburbs, to the current 60 percent in the central cities and 40
percent in the suburbs. Through its Metropolitan Housing and Redevelopment Authority, the Council works with
91 suburban cities to assist over 4,000 families in finding a safe, decent place to live.
Where is the Metropolitan Council?
It's located in the Metro Square Building at 7th and Robert Sts., in downtown St. Paul. The Council plans to
move in mid -1988 to new quarters in downtown--St.: Paul's Lowertown area. The new address is 230 E. 5th St.
n Sibley and Wacouta Sts.
between ,q.
�:. , �! -,rte � °. =�� ,•�- ��''`'
�4- .t: ^.:ri.i_ 5. .. 6y +..4 <�iv., .. .. ... ... ... •ter .� ..�` .a's'- Y.k�'t� ✓'..
Who leads the Council?
The Council has 17 members, 16 appointed by the gove
time terms from districts within the region that are rou
The 17th member is the full -time chair, who is appoint:
serves at the governor's pleasure. The Council's work
time professional staff. Hundreds of citizens from throu
involved in various ways, including service on the Cour
committees.
Council Members
1 �. /..
District 1 Liz Anderson.
Former senior administrative
officer for the state Department of
Energy and Economic Development.
914 Parkview Av., St. Paul, MN
55/17 Tel. 488 -9494 (h). Term ex-
, pires January 1989.
District 4 Carol Flynn. Former
member of the Metropolitan Waste
Control Commission. 4741 Elliot
Av., Minneapolis, MN 55407 Tel.
827-2016 (h). Term expires January
1991.
District 7 Mary Hauser.
Former Birchwood City Council
member. 616 Hall Av.. Birchwood,
MN 55110. Tel. 426 -2732 (h). Term
expires January 1989.
r to four -year part -
y equal in population.
)y the governor and
.tpported by a full-
out the region also are
is many advisory
Distr 2 Mike McLaughlin.
Owner ',d manager of Summit
Manor.. , catering business. 275
Summit >>., St. Paul, MN 55102.
Tel. 22j- W11 (h). Term expires
Jarman 1991.
District 5 David F. Fisher.
Attorney ur Pillsbury Co., Minne-
apolis, and former commissioner
and treasurer of the Minneapolis
Commission on Civil Rights. 5047
Gladston» Av. S., Minneapolis, MN
55419. Tel. 330 -5017 (o) and
822 -2389 (h). Term expires January
1989.
District 8 Donald E. Stein.
i Vice Chair, First State Bank in
1 Spring Lake Park, and Chair, First
-i Bank Coon Rapids. 11721 Evergreen
Circle NW, Coon Rapids. MN
55433. Tel. 786 -3300 (o), 755 -3333
(o) and 757-1949 (h). Term expires
January :Y91.
District 13 Dirk deVries.
Realtor and former member of the
Minnetonk Zoning Appeals Board.
18600 Woolman Dr., Minnetonka,
MN 55345. Tel. 474 -7527 (h). Term
expires January 1989.
District 12 Gertrude Ulrich.
Former chair of the Minnesota
Cable Communications Board. 7601 :
Aldrich Av., Richfield. MN 55423.
Tel. 866 -8171 (h). Perm expire
January 1991. /
di a
4
District 14 Marcy J. Waritz.
Former public service volunteer, R
Dist. 112 School Board member and
former member of the state Council
on Quality Education. Mailing ad-
dress: 1271 Bluff Creek Dr. ,
Chaska, MN 55318. Residence is in
Chanhassen. Tel. 445 -4826 (h).
Term expires January 1991.
isi
_ ,.1 co
District 10 John Evans. IBM
Corporation public affairs consul-
tant and member of the Hennepin
County Board of Equalization. 7531
Angeline Dr., New Hope, MN
55428. Tel. 893 -2444 (0) and
536 -8301 (h). Term expires Januay
r. -s 1991.
District 15 Mary K. Martin.
Attorney in private practice in West
St. Paul. 2411 Francis St.. South St.
Paul, MN 55075. Tel. 450 -9892 (o)
and 451 -8470 (h). Term expires
January 1989.
DAKOTA CO
Chair Steve 1: 'efe. Former com-
missioner of the .rtate Department
of Labor and Industry and former
member of the Minnesota Senate.
Keefe also has been chair of the
Minneapolis Community' Develop-
ment Agency and government rela-
tions officer for Norwest Corp.
1639 Cedar Lake Pkysv. , St. Louis
Park, MN 55416. Tel. 291 -6453 (o)
and 374 -3822 (h).
District 3 Charles William
Wiger. Attorney in private practice
1'
and former chair of the North St.
.cr. 1 Paul Solid Waste Commission. 2892
Mary La .e, Maplewood, MN 55109.
Tel. 483 -1313 (o) and 770 -0283 (h).
Term expires January 1989.
District 6 Joan Campbell.
Head nurse of the Referral Center
and the Employee Health Service at
the University of Minnesota
Hospitals. 947 17th Av. SE., Min-
neapolis MN 554/4. Tel. 626 -3934
(o) and 331 -8251 (h). Term expires
January 1991.
District 9 Josephine D. Nunn.
Former Champlin mayor and
former president of the League of
Minnesota Cities. 401 Elm Creek
Rd., Champlin, MN 55316. Tel. _
421 -1547 (h). Term expires January
1989.
METROPOLITAN
COUNCIL
DISTRICTS
ANOKA CO
District 11 Dottie Rietow.
President of Consensus, a govern
mental relations, public affairs al
affirmative action consultant firm
1317 Kilmer Av. S., St. Louis Par
MN 55426. Tel. 545 -5848 (o and
Term expires January 1989.
District 16 Patrick J. (Pat)
Scully. Former Dakota County
Commissioner. 1617 Ashland St.,
Hastings, MN 55033. Tel. 438 -35(
(h). Term expires January 1991.
The Council and Metro Agencies: How Plans Become Reality
The Metropolitan Council was designed by the state legislature as a policy- setting body with a comprehensive
view of the Twin Cities Metropolitan Area of Minnesota.
The Council's policies and plans are mapped out in its Metropolitan Development Guide. They provide a
framework that metropolitan agencies (below), local governments and the private sector use in making planning
decisions in areas ranging from regional growth and finances to airports, housing, health and solid waste.
The Council conducts environmental impact studies to ensure the protection of the region's clean air and water.
It coordinates planning among different levels of government, such as working with the Minnesota Department of
Transportation to plan for the region's roads. It also reviews every community's long -range plan to make sure it
conforms with the Council's overall plans for sewers, airports, transit and parks.
The Council reviews and comments on hundreds of applications from the public and private sectors for state and
federal funding each year, and determines how each proposal conforms with its regional plans.
To ensure that its plans for the regional sewer, airport, transit and park systems are carried out, the Council has
a legal responsibility to oversee the following five metropolitan agencies.
•Metropolitan Waste Control Commission (MWCC). The MWCC owns and operates the region's sewer system,
including the big Metro plant in St. Paul. Since the 1960s the MWCC has worked to consolidate the region's
sewage treatment plants, creating a modern, efficient system to meet the region's sewage disposal needs. The
Council sells bonds for capital improvements to the sewer system, and approves the commission's development
program and capital budget.
•Regional Transit Board (RTB). The RTB conducts short -range transit planning, and allocates funds to public
and private transit operators in the Twin Cities Metropolitan Area. Created by the legislature in 1984 to take over
the planning duties of the Metropolitan Transit Commission, the RTB is the newest metro agency. The Council ap-
proves the RTB's implementation plan, financial plan and capital budget. It also sells bonds for the board.
•Metropolitan Parks and Open Space Commission. The only agency without operating duties, the parks com-
mission acts as an advisory planning arm of the Council. As such, it plays a key role in developing the regional
park system, among the most admired in the nation. The 43 parks and trails are actually owned and operated,
however, by six metropolitan counties, the Suburban Hennepin Regional Park District, the Minneapolis Park and
Recreation Board, and the cities of Bloomington and St. Paul. The Council prepares a system plan for regional
parks and open space. Using state funds. it makes grants for the acquisition and development of regional parks,
park reserves, trails and special recreational facilities. Since 1985, the Council has used funds provided by the
legislature to make supplementary operating grants to the agencies that own the parks.
•Metropolitan Airports Commission (MAC). MAC's hugest, best -known responsibility is operating Minneapolis -
St. Paul International Airport. Created in 1943. MAC also owns and manages six satellite airports in the region.
With more than one million flights taking off and landing at the region's seven airports each year, the Metropolitan
Area has one of the busiest airport systems in the nation. The Council approves the MAC's master plan for each
airport, and any capital projects the commission undertakes that cost over $5 million at the international airport.
or over $2 million at other airports.
•Metropolitan Sports Facilities Commission. The sports facilities commission owns and operates the Hubert H.
Humphrey Metrodome in downtown Minneapolis. The Council issued the S55 million in bonds that financed the
stadium's construction, and approves the commission's Operating budget to ensure that sufficient funds are available
for paying the debt on those bonds.
[73
fit. /
Council Priorities: Getting the Job Done
The Metropolitan Council deals with
literally hundreds of issues facing the
Twin Cities Area each year, so setting
priorities is an important task. By
choosing a few priorities each year, the
Council ensures that it will focus its time
and energies on the region's most press-
ing problems. The six 1988 priorities are
described below.
Planning for the 21st Century
One thing about the 21st century we know: it's only
12 short years away. We also know that in the year
2000 it's only another 12 years before the baby -boom
generation starts turning 65 and retiring. That means
that in the next 20 years the region needs to prepare
for a much larger number of retired people and a far
smaller number of working people to support them.
To get ready, we need to make improvements to our
basic support systems, like sewers, highways and
bridges, while the baby- boomers are still paying taxes.
This is one example of an emerging issue the Coun-
cil is dealing with as it plans for the 21st century. The
Council has embarked on a strategic planning process
aimed at uncovering problems the region may face in
the next 20 or 30 years and identifying the Council's
role in dealing with them. Solutions to the problems
could involve new technologies that fundamentally
change the way we live.
For example, will traffic congestion grow to the
point where we need to greatly reduce the number of
cars on the roads at rush hour? And what will be the
solution —light rail transit? High- occupancy vehicle
lanes? Computerized guideways? Or one of a dozen
other innovative techniques to move people about the
region? Will problems of poverty, homelessness,
hunger and lack of health care grow to where the
region will need to pull together a new, coordinated
system of human services where nobody falls through
the cracks? The Council will seek to identify the
public policy issues that will affect the region in the
21st century so we can have the kinds of governmental
Economic Analysis
systems, at costs we can afford, that will deliver the
kinds of services people want. = -
Transportation
Traffic on Twin Cities Area roads and in its skies
has been manageable up to now. Congestion occurs on
some of the major highways, and although the delays
are not major, they are becoming more frequent. But
what about the year 2010? Will we have the same
mobility we enjoy today? In 1988 the Council is revis-
ing its policy plan for the region's highways and
public transit to help maintain access to where we
want to go.
Although the region's highway system will not grow
much in the future, its number of people, households
and jobs will, as will its number of cars and trips.
This means more congestion and less accessibility.
The revised plan says the region cannot respond to
growing travel demand just by adding new roads. The
plan will seek to move more people, not necessarily
more vehicles. That means metering freeway ramps
and providing special lanes for vehicles carrying more
than one person. It also means changing people's
behavior, such as staggering work hours and providing
incentives for people to travel together rather than
singly. The plan also says that the region needs to
continue its public transit subsidy for people who are
disabled, poor, or too young or too old to drive.
Part of the strategy for moving more people and
fewer vehicles is a regional light rail transit system.
The Council is working to coordinate the development
of the system. which it envisions as focusing on
downtown Minneapolis and St. Paul and radiating out
into Hennepin, Ramsey and possibly other counties.
Congestion and noise have also grown at the
Minneapolis -St. Paul International Airport. The Coun-
cil is studying how to ensure the adequacy of the air-
port over the next 20 or 30 years, including the
possibility of building a new airport. The study covers
the issues of aircraft noise, safety and physical capaci-
ty, and the role the airport plays in the growth and
development of the region.
What kind of governmental services -are needed for
the Twin Cities Area economy to work? How does the
region stay competitive and keep job opportunities
here? These are questions the Metropolitan Council
wants to answer by designing governmental services to
support the region's economy at the lowest possible
cost. To figure out how to design those services, the
Council is studying the broader context of the region's
economy. For example, how is the Metro Area impor-
tant to the state? How important is world trade to the
Metro Area? Where are the markets for the region's
products? The Council is analyzing and diagnosing the
region's economy by looking at its industries,
resources, labor force, markets and competitive
advantages.
A second effort is to analyze the region's economic
foundations. The Council itself does not have a pro-
gram to stimulate economic development. The private
sector, the Council believes, is the major force behind
the region's economic growth. What the Council can
do is explore the strengths and weaknesses of the
foundation that underlies all private- sector efforts. The
foundation includes the region's work force, with its
education and technological- capabilities; an infrastruc-
ture that includes roads, airports and sewers; natural
resources such as clean, abundant water; the
availability of capital; the region's tax base; and the
region's quality of life. The Council will analyze
government programs that represent investments in the
region's economy and new ways the investments might
be used to strengthen it.
Third, the Council is analyzing the region's chang-
ing work force. As the baby -boom generation ages,
there will be more older workers and fewer in entry -
level positions. At the same time, the structure of the
region's economy is shifting away from manufacturing
toward service and information. The Council is ex-
ploring the implications of an aging work force adap-
ting to a changing economy. How will jobs change?
How will workers shift from one sector to another?
What will happen to the supply of and the demand for
labor? Will the economy be flexible enough and
healthy enough to handle the changes that lie ahead?
The Council's findings are intended to help the
region's public and private sectors meet today's moun-
ting economic challenges.
Solid Waste
To protect the Twin Cities Area's groundwater and
keep valuable farmland from being used to dump
trash, the 1985 state legislature prohibited putting un-
processed waste in landfills, beginning in 1990.
Since then, public and private groups have been
joining forces to reduce the region's dependence on
Iandfills by using trash as a resource in itself. The
processes they are developing include:
— Resource recovery, bui wing trash (or fuel made
• from trash) for steam and electricity;
— Recycling, separating materials like glass and
aluminum from trash for reuse; and
— Composting, converting bulky yard wastes into a
useful soil conditioner.
The Council is encouraging these efforts to manage
trash in new ways, and is coordinating projects so that
different processing facilities and methods work
together as a comprehensive regional system. The
Council conducts environmental studies of many pro-
posed projects, as it did in 1986 for Hennepin Coun-
ty's planned trash - burning plant.
The Council also reports to the legislature on the
region's progress in reducing the need for landfills. In
1987 the Council reported that the region's counties
have committed themselves to fulfilling the law of no
unprocessed waste in landfills by 1992 rather than
1990.
With funds raised from a surcharge on dumping at
area landfills, the Council also provides grants and
loans to businesses, local governments, nonprofit
organizations and others. The grants and loans support
projects that help meet the region's need for an order-
ly, reliable trash - management system.
Even though the use of landfills will soon decline,
they will still be needed. Where are unprocessable
wastes and the ash from trash - burning best disposed
of? Is it better to expand some existing landfills or
develop new ones? The Council confronts these issues
when it considers requests to expand landfills, and
proposals to develop lands that are now set aside for
possible future use as landfills.
Water Resources
When rain falls or snow melts, water runs off city
streets and rural farmland, carrying polluted waters
into the region's lakes and rivers. Agricultural runoff
contains pollutants such as soils, fertilizers, pesticides,
phosphorus. nitrogen and metals. Runoff from city
yards, streets, parking lots and construction sites also
contains fertilizers, soils and other pollutants like
metals and oil. The pollution threatens the region's
lakes and rivers by creating green water clogged with
algae, which depletes oxygen in the water and kills
fish.
The Council in 1988 is helping develop a com-
prehensive program to deal with urban and rural
runoff. It is studying the eft
runoff in ponds and wetland
allow pollutants to settle, be
into lakes and rivers. After!
Council will publish the resi
control guidelines for local
and watershed management:
The region's groundwater,
drinking water, is being thre
leaking landfills, agricultura'
and hazardous waste. The p
ty for protecting groundwate _
many state, regional and loc agencies that no consis-
tent regional groundwater pc exists. The Council is
exploring the need for comp ... nsive groundwater
and surface water policies, a a management struc-
ture empowered to carry the:. out.
The Council is also looking into whether the
region's rivers, streams, wetla: ;;ls, drainage ditches
and groundwater should be considered a regional
"system'.'—as airports or sew are already defined —
and how that system would r,..' managed. In addition,
the Council is revising its regional sewer plan to
reflect new legislation redefining the relationship
between the Council and the Metropolitan Waste Con-
trol Commission. The revision will also incorporate
new population estimates for the year 2000 and 2010.
These numbers will be used to examine current sewer
capacity and to determine whether additional sewer
service is needed.
eness of holding
r a period of time, to
releasing the water
'yzing the data, the
along with runoff
rnments, developers
nizations.
major source of
:d by pollution from
:micals, septic systems
m is that responsibili-
. spread among so
Planning for Human Services
Until now, the Council's major plans for the
region's development have concentrated on the
physical side, such as sewers, roads, parks and air-
ports. But the Council understands that human
services —arts, health care, housing and services for
older people —also need to be coordinated in planning
for the successful use and development of the region's
human resources. That's why it has decided to in-
tegrate its regional planning for physical and human
resources. The Council plans to do this in the
knowledge that at bottom, everything government does
is for people —be it building an airport, sewer or tran-
sit system, or creating programs in health, education
or welfare.
In 1988 the Council is beginning an effort to
coordinate its human - service planning programs so
they can be of most help to public and private agen-
cies dealing with the region's tough social problems.
It is holding a series of public forums in the spring,
bringing together people from many groups —
governmental units, human - service providers, volun-
tary agencies, business and labor. The Council expects
this diverse group of people to "cross- fertilize" their
ideas and come up with the seeds of future social
policies for the region.
Four forums are planned to address the region's
needs in four areas: changing family structures, volun-
tary vs. paid caregiving, training the future work
force, and an economic underclass.
The Council's objectives are to:
— Encourage investment in the region's most impor-
tant resource, its people;
— Provide the basis for a systematic, long -range look
at the region's human - resource needs;
— Promote quality, equity and economy in the plan-
ning and delivery of human services;
— Promote region -wide agreement on the major
human - service goals in the region;
— Provide the basis for coordinating the region's
human - resource program; and
— Help the Council and other decision - makers,
including local governments, make human - resource
decisions.
Wondering About Money?
The Metropolitan Council's 1988 budget of $12.2
million is virtually the same as the 1987 amended
budget. The staff complement is 213 in 1988, up
slightly from 208 at the beginning of 1987.
The bulk of the money for the 1988 budget comes
from local and federal sources. In 1988, 71 percent of
the budget comes from local sources, 60 percent of it
from the property tax the Council levies. Federal
sources provide 23 percent, and the state funds about
6 percent of the budget.
The Council's mill rate limit has remained the same
since 1974 when the legislature set it at 8 /30ths of a
mill. That works out to about $4.60 a year on a
$90,000 home. The levy is applied to all taxable
property in the seven - county Metropolitan Area. The
other portions of local funding, about 11 percent of
the Council's overall budget, are reimbursements for
services the Council provides to the metropolitan
agencies that operate the sewers, transit system and
airports, and from interest income and other sources.
National 1301 Pennsylvania Avenue NW
League Washington, D.C.
of 20004
Cities (202) 626 -3000
PRIORITIES FOR AMERICA'S CITIES AND TOWNS
Officers
President
Pamela P. Plumb
Councilor, Portland, Maine
First Vice President
Terry Goddard
Mayor, Phoenix, Arizona
Second Vice President
Bob Bolen
Mayor, Ft. Worth, Texas
Immediate Past President
Cathy Reynolds
Councilwoman-at-Large,
Denver, Colorado
Executive Director
Alan Beals
Our country is only as strong as our investment in hometown America. We must educate and house
our people, treat our sick, rebuild our infrastructure, and protect our environment. We must not
only rebuild a system of water lines, bridges, and highways, but we must also equip our
communities to cope with poverty, drug abuse, AIDS, crime and homelessness.
The federal budget priorities set in the 1987 summit agreement ignore the problems communities
must deal with at the local level. They are the problems of the nation and must be properly
addressed and funded by the Federal government in partnership with local communities.
The summit agreement put key municipal programs in competition with other critical domestic
programs. It protected foreign aid by increasing and insulating it. It did the same for defense. And
the agreement left the largest non - needs - tested programs out of the budget competition.
The rules set under the agreement are wrong. They mean that funding for homeless assistance
must compete against funding for AIDS. Funding for anti -drug abuse must compete against the
Community Development Block Grant program. Housing must compete against funding for federally
mandated wastewater construction.
Moreover, by creating a set of rules which forces cuts in priority municipal programs but exempts
most federal spending, taxes, and tax expenditures, the agreement appears certain to miss the
Gramm - Rudman deficit target. To meet the target, the federal government will either have to use
accounting gimmicks or allow another automatic triggering of unbalanced and disproportionate
Gramm - Rudman cuts later this year.
Cities and towns where a large percentage of people live are not responsible for the federal deficit,
nor has a 72 percent reduction in the last decade in municipal programs helped reduce the deficit.
Cuts and eliminations in key programs affecting people in our urban communities have been
accompanied by record deficits and debt. The nation now risks leaving a legacy of debt and
disinvestment to its next generation, at the same time reducing the fiscal ability of cities and
towns to act to provide for our citizens.
The federal government cannot simply abandon its long time partnership with local government.
The nation faces challenges which federal, state and local governments must confront and resolve
together.
1989 Federal Budget
As we have for seven consecutive years, the National League of Cities offers again this year
constructive federal budget proposals to help reduce the federal deficit and permit the federal
government to address the most pressing priorities of the nation.
First, we continue to encourage Congress and the administration to reject Gramm - Rudman budget
solutions which avoid accountability and responsibility for deficit reduction.
Second, we urge the Congress to reconsider the summit agreement, both with regard to the
priorities it set and to the resulting deficit it leaves. We cannot support an agreement which
increases and insulates foreign aid, defense and non - needs - tested entitlement programs while setting
the stage for reduction of aid to this nation's cities and towns.
(over)
\. C \- U
-2-
Third, we urge the Congress to give careful scrutiny to all expenditures -- tax, credit, and
direct - -on a function by function basis. Tax expenditures and expenditures for credit have the
same impact on the federal deficit as direct expenditures.
Fourth, we oppose any cuts in priority municipal programs below 1988 funding levels.
Fifth, any expenditure increases should be supported by an equivalent revenue increase with the
only exception being in needs - tested entitlement programs.
Sixth, we urge the administration and the Congress to enact legislation to account for the
mandated costs of laws, taxes, regulations and preemptions on municipalities and to set forth
specifically the means by which such costs can be met.
Legislative Priorities
The National League of Cities believes the federal government should set the following program
priorities for this year:
• Taxes and Municipal Finance -- We urge the restoration of traditional municipal bond
authority. Cities should not be required to pay federal taxes on the purchase of gas and
diesel fuel. We oppose efforts to subject municipal sinking funds to federal taxes. We
support initiatives to broaden the municipal bond market to enable municipal governments to
provide affordable housing and jobs for low income persons;
• Housing and Community Development -- The federal government must invest more funds in
housing and community development in partnership with states and local governments. We
urge full funding for assisted housing, CDBG, UDAG and programs for the homeless at the
levels signed into law. We also support Congressional efforts to create a new long -term
federal housing policy;
• Environment -- The federal government must ensure that municipalities have the resources to
meet costly federal environmental mandates. We urge Congress to reauthorize the Clean Air
Act and to provide cities and towns with the resources to meet the Clean Water Act
deadlines;
• Transportation -- We must honor our long standing national commitment to transportation.
We urge full funding and spending for the nation's public transportation, highway, and airport
programs. We oppose using dedicated trust fund revenues for deficit reduction;
• Welfare Reform -- We urge the Senate to complete action and the President to sign into law
landmark welfare reform legislation to help provide the poorest families in cities and towns
with economic hope, assistance and opportunity;
• Mail Order Sales Tax Collections -- The federal government has an opportunity to help state
and local governments without a federal deficit impact. We urge passage of legislation to
restore the rights of states and municipalities to collect sales tax revenues for out -of -state
mail order catalogue sales, and
• Mandates -- Substituting federal mandates for federal leadership and federal resources does
not resolve national problems; it passes the buck. We oppose efforts to require mandatory
medicare coverage for city employees. We urge the federal government to enact legislation to
require the federal government to account and compensate for the costs it mandates upon
local taxpayers by any law or regulation.
The challenges now facing our nation call for a renewed close working partnership between
Congress, the Administration and local municipal governments. We remain committed to this goal
and hopeful such a partnership can be restored.
°\\
Decision
Resources Ltd.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
This summary overviews the results of a telephone survey of
404 randomly selected residents of the City of Eagan. Survey
responses were gathered on January 14, 1988 and between January
19 and 21, 1988. The average interview took twenty-three
minutes. All respondents interviewed in this study were part of
a randomly generated sample of the city. In general, random
samples such as this yield results projectable to the entire
universe of Eagan residents within + 5.0 percentage points in 95
out of 100 cases.
Eagan is a fast - growing, young, relatively affluent white
collar community. It is fairly homogeneous. except for the
distinct differences between home owners and renters. This
latter group will also exhibit a much greater degree of
transience in their plans for the future. As a result, although
the city will slowly age over time, it will continue to possess a
very young population segment.
The large number of households containing young children
will clearly have an impact on city service demands. As will be
shown later in this analysis, residents place a very high value
on park and recreational facilities. And, there is some worry
that community growth will not be balanced against environmental
needs. Livability issues, then, can be expected to dominate
policy debates for the next few years.
In this stage of the city "life cycle," communications with
residents must be a top priority, even though transience will
somewhat complicate it. In many fast growing areas, a feeling of
alienation can quickly develop because of the changing nature of
the environment. Communication, then, is the only means for
mitigating its impact. Since many residents share similar age,
occupational, and educational characteristics, a consensus on
most issues will be readily creatable if information is provided
in a timely fashion.
In comparison to many other suburban areas, the demographic
changes facing Eagan place it in its on class. Declining school
populations, tax bases, or residential aging are definitely not
problems the city will need to tackle for many years. During the
next decade, Eagan will have a very rare opportunity for
Metropolitan Area suburbs: the ability to carefully plan for the
future as the key population center of the third ring suburbs.
Eagan residents rate the quality of life in their city
3128 Dean Court • Minneapolis, Minnesota 55416 • (612) 920 -0337
extremely high. They take pride in their neighborhoods and are
generally satisfied with the way things are currently going. If
there is a lurking problem, it is the future: can Eagan
"suburbanize" without losing its exurban ambience? Answering
this questions will be key to the continued vitality of the
community.
Overall, Eagan has done a good job in handling its rapid
growth. But, as more younger families move into the city,
residential needs will change appreciably. Citizens, even now,
want to preserve open space and develop more amenities. There is
also a concern about city services and the ability to keep pace
with the influx of new residents. "Quality growth," then, may be
the by -words of the future: targeting development in such a way
as to preserve a natural environment for recreation and to avoid
an undue drain on the quality of city services.
Residents place a high value on recreation and leisure
activities. Although interests are varied, most residents pursue
some type of sport or outdoor leisure opportunity. Patterns of
participation are consistent with the "wellness" emphasis seen
across the nation. But, the dominance of young families adds a
twist toward group activities rather than individual endeavors.
As a result, non -team sports activities are as important as
league or organized activities. Since the general environment of
Eagan was found to be a positive characteristic of the city, it
is not surprising that most residents take advantage of
recreational opportunities.
The Parks and Recreation Department was generally rated very
highly by Eagan citizens. Both programming and facilities were
awarded solid grades. Satisfaction with maintenance and upkeep
was also the rule. If there is discontent, it lies in the
feeling that the park system should be further developed. But,
on the major issues facing the Department, citizens were very
content.
For Department planning purposes, however, several issues
emerged. The level of information about recreational
opportunities should be heightened; one strategy might be the
better targeting of news to-renters. Sand Volleyball courts,
tennis courts, archery ranges, and horseshoe courts should be
considered for future construction projects. The issue of an ice
arena should be considered in the near future; however, it should
be discussed within the context of an "ice arena" rather than a
"hockey arena." Finally, if Parkview and Carriage Hill Golf
Courses are sold, the city should move to acquire and maintain
operations at both facilities. This agenda represents a very
pro- active positioning. But, the study conclusively shows that
citizens desire and would support an aggressive development and
expansion of the Eagan Park System.
Eagan residents are not dogmatically anti -tax. They demon-
strate a prudence which permits tax increases for certain
expenditures. By and large, city services are well- received. As
��3
a result, most citizens will accept a tax increase to keep
services at their current levels. But, there is some
miscommunication about the extent of city taxes; many residents
overestimate the city share of property taxes, while even more
had no idea about their percentage. Communications on this point
might not only increase the reservoir of good will already
existing toward the City, but would also set the stage for later
funding requests.
A majority of residents rated each city service tested in
the study as satisfactory. However, city street repair and
maintenance has the potential of becoming a major issue in the
future. Snow plowing and drainage /flood control also need some
reappraisal and monitoring. But, overall, for a fast - growing
suburb, the city has dome a remarkable job of keeping pace with
development.
Development is, in fact, the key concern of most residents.
They are interested in attracting certain kinds of facilities --
residential and retail are given high priorities. Citizens also
indicated they would be more careful in zoning and planning
procedures if they were members of the City Council. No growth
sentiment is almost non - existent; careful, quality growth is the
direction sought by most residents.
Eagan residents share many issue orientations with other
Metropolitan Area communities. A plurality would support further
restrictions on snowmobiling within the city -- optimally
confined to certain trails and areas. A plurality oppose the
acquisition of an arts garden and also can see no reason for the
City to supplement current areawide cultural offerings. One
project for possible consideration, though, might be a local
playhouse, since threshold support existed for such a facility.
But, in general, Eagan residents have a very clear concept of the
types of things the City should and should not do, particularly
in recreational activities planning.
The level of information about city government is relatively
high; conversely, actual contact with one manifestation of the
City, its staff, is relatively low. The staff, however, did
receive both strong positive and negative evaluations. The
latter came, curiously, from people having little or no contact
with city employees. There is a troubling divergence, then,
between the reality of staff effectiveness and its secondary
reputation.
For a developing community, Eagan lacks many of the problems
evident in other communities. There appears to be a broad
consensus in place on most issues. Services are well rated.
Contact with city employees is generally positive. The challenge
for the future, then, is the continuation of these perceptions.
Things are going well; the key is to keep them going in the same
direction.
There is an excellent likelihood that the voters of Eagan
will support the construction and partial operation of a
Community Recreation Center. Ideally, the facility proposal
should contain the following points:
1. An indoor swimming pool.
2. Ice skating rink and gymnasium.
3. Average property tax increase no greater than
$67.
4. Additional facilities carefully selected to reflect
community preferences and the tax hike ceiling.
5. A large community room, clearly publicized as a
revenue generator.
If the proposal were to follow these parameters, the chances of
success at the polls would be maximized.
Although the support of athletic associations will be
critical to the success of the referendum, planners must bear in
mind that most citizens desire access to the facilities for free-
style activities. Hence, it will be necessary to make it clear
from the outset that multiple uses are foreseen for the swimming
pool and ice rink. Although probably not impacting the ice rink,
the design of the swimming pool must be oriented toward family
and individual use.
Eagan residents show the highest level of support for a
community recreation center that the researchers have found in
the suburbs. However, turnout will be critical. Both a low
turnout dominated by opponents or a high turnout dominated by the
uninformed could reverse citywide sentiment at the polls.
Consequently, an aggressive informational and voter identifica-
tion effort will be needed to insure success.
Communications with residents are good in comparison with
other fast growing communities, but they could be improved. In
fact, action should be taken now in order to insure that condi-
tions do not deteriorate to a critical condition. There are a
number of deficiencies in the communications system that deserve
some remedial attention.
Residents are using an extensive mix of devices to gain
knowledge about city activities, in general, and recreational
opportunities, in particular. The Park and Recreation Department
needs to prioritize a couple of major communications vehicles and
rely upon them. Of course, once the choices have been made,
publicity will be needed to alert the citizenry. Since residents
are already dependent upon the "Eagan Chronicle" to a large
extent, city communications should primarily depend upon that
source. Cable television already has a wide viewership, so the
City may also wish to consider upgrading its program offerings
and productions. By building upon existing strengths and priori-
tizing communications vehicles, Eagan could very rapidly develop
an efficient system during its high growth period.
At the same time, decisions need to be made about reaching
4 ,G 5
renters. By their transient nature, the problem of reaching many
of these people will be complicated; but, the City of Eagan could
be doing a better job in integrating them into the communications
network. Both the "Eagan Chronicle" and the "Eagan News" should
evaluate their current delivery systems at apartment buildings.
A further possibility might be the establishment of regular well -
publicized City Council sessions in areas near or close to the
apartment buildings. Unlike many other suburbs with high pro-
portions of renters, Eagan renters are not demographically
different or irrevocably alienated from the community: the main
chore facing the City is establishing contact rather than
ameliorating differences.
For the fastest growing community in the Twin Cities Area,
Eagan citizens show an astonishingly high degree of contentment
with the city. Normally, growth brings with it concerns about
fundamental changes in the lifestyle of the community. Quite
the contrary, Eagan residents look more toward the opportunities
associated with "quality growth" than the pitfalls of "suburban -
ization." They feel that city officials will make the correct
judgments in the future to keep things on course. They are
confident that a balance can be struck between business and
residential growth, on the one hand, and the natural ambience of
the area, on the other. It is this consensus on the quality of
life, appearing while the rapid growth phase of the city takes
place, which makes Eagan both unique and remarkable in comparison
to other communities.
5 C2
TYPE WORK PERFORMED
Fire/Rescue
Training
Truck & Equipment Maint.
Station Maintenance
Fire Prevention
Administrative
BF;
Structure
Grass
Vehicle
False
Medical
Other
11.1.- ."`/..1-..^
MUN[HLY REPORT FOR February, 1988
TOTAL
MAN HOURS
540
535
157
118
8u
773
TOTAL 2,209
MANPOWER STATION #1 STATION #2 STATION #J
Available Nights 1 14 10
bays 4 4 2 ___
Available Days � Nights 3 ..-
Available Rotating 1
On Leave ` o
Rookies 6 11
TOTAL 29 30 29
NUMBER $ LOSS__
7
10
5
33
LARGE DOLLAR_LOSSES
DATE NAME L{CA[ION OCCUPANCY $ LOSS
02/17/88 Q Rahn & Cliff Truck 10,000
,�7
~( /
`'
3 10.000
1 0 0 0 0
F 11/87
Cityof apple!! 14200CedarAvenueS. Telephone 612 - 431 -8800
va ey Apple Valley, Minnesota 55124
MAYOR AND COUNCIL
City of Eagan
3830 Pilot Knob Road
Eagan, Minnesota 55122
Attention: Thomas Hedges
City Administrator
Dear Mr. Hedges:
RE: Apple Valley Structure Fire of March 4th
I would like to take this opportunity to thank you and your fire
department for the outstanding efforts in our City on March 4th. At that
time, the City of Apple Valley was faced with fighting a very severe,
totally - involved structure that over taxed the capabilities of our fire
department and its' equipment. Without your mutual aid and help from
your community and fire department, we would have been faced with a total
public safety disaster.
Paraphrased, as Franklin Roosevelt once said, when your neighbor's
house is on fire, you loan him the hose to put out the fire and afterwards
talk details. In our case, you have done exactly that and we greatly
appreciate the help.
It is very gratifying to see community cooperation in times of need
and we definitely do want to thank you for your help and the efforts
provided by your people at that fire scene and /or supporting our fire
department by manning our stations. If there is anything that we can ao
for you in the future, please let us know. We look forward to continuing
the fine relationship that we enjoy. .
TMM /kg
1 j
Thank you very much.
March 11, 1988
Sincerely,
CITY OF APPLE VALLEY
Thomas M. Melena
City Administrato
Home of the Minnesota Zoological Garden
MEMO TO: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES
FROM: FINANCE DIRECTOR /CITY CLERK VANOVERBEKE
DATE: MARCH 10, 1988
SUBJECT: WORKERS COMPENSATION PREMIUM REFUND
As you recall, when the City approved the insurance package for
the period July 1, 1986, through July 1, 1987, the workers
compensation coverage was changed to provide for a minimum
premium of $32,896 with a maximum premium of $124,106 in the
event of adverse loss experience. These minimum and maximum
numbers were based on a standard quotation of $89,290. The City
was in effect assuming some risk (the difference between $124,106
and $89,290 or $34,816) that total losses would be less than
$89,290.
We have now received the information for this period and a refund
check in the amount of $21,888. Per the attached information,
the losses for the period were $34,169.99 and reserved at an
additional 10% for a total of $37,587. This amount added to the
agreed upon minimum of $34,693 and subtracted from the total
paid to date generates the $21,888 refund. The numbers are
slightly different than projected because the audited premium
came to $94,168 versus the $89,290 used previously.
I believe this is an excellent start on the utilization of this
"risk taking" concept. It should be noted, however, that overall
success or failure should be evaluated over a five -year time
period and not based on just one year.
Please let me know if you would like any additional information
or if you would like to discuss this situation in more detail.
FinancJ Director /City Clerk
EJV /kf
'‘a
ASSISTED HOUSING
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
* + = Increase /- = Decrease
Status Report for Dakota County **
February, 1988
TOTAL ASSISTED HOUSING 1,064
Amount
of
Elderly Family Total ( + / -)*
Section 8 Existing:
Certificates 397 1,174 1,571 +17
Vouchers 36 168 204 +1
Moderate Rehab 4 21 25 0
Section 8 New Construction 247 300 547 0
Low Rent Housing 380 182 562 0
235 Home 0 41 41 0
236 Rental 0 526 526 0
2,412 3,476
+18
Amount
Commercial/ of
Elderly Family Multifamily Total Increase
MHFA Local Participation 0 2 0 2 0
MHFA Home Improvement Loan 33 159 0 192 2
MHFA Home Rehab Loan 63 76 0 139 0
MHFA Home Energy Loan 10 109 0 119 4
Rental Rehab 38 49 5 92 0
CDBG Rehab Loan 87 159 0 246 0
CDBG Rehab Loan - Mobile Home 1 20 0 21 0
MHFA Solar Bank Energy Loan 0 8 0 8 0
312 Loan - Residential 4 15 0 19 0
312 Loan - Commercial/
Mixed Use N/A N/A 3 3 0
Weatherization 342 1,380 0 1,722 11
TOTAL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 578 1,970 8 2,556 17
** Numbers for the City of South St. Paul are included in
Assisted Housing, Rental Rehab, and Weatherization, but are
excluded from the rest of the Community Development programs;
South St. Paul operates separate Community Development
programs.
* + = Increase /- = Decrease
Status Report for the City of Eagan
February, 1988
Amount
of
ASSISTED HOUSING Elderly_ Family Total ( + / -)*
Section 8 Existing:
Certificates 41 234 275 +2
Vouchers 20 60 80 0
Section 8 New Construction 0 33 33 0
Low Rent Housing 0 17 17 0
236 Rental 0 144 144 0
TOTAL ASSISTED HOUSING 61 488 549 +2
Amount
of
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Elderly Family Total Increase
MHFA Home Improvement Loan 2 12 14 1
MHFA Home Rehab Loan 3 3 6 0
MHFA Home Energy Loan 1 8 9 1
CDBG Rehab Loan 1 4 5 0
Weatherization 5 64 69 0
TOTAL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 12
91 103
2
REGULAR MEETING
EAGAN CITY COUNCIL
EAGAN, MINNESOTA
MUNICIPAL CENTER BUILDING
APRIL 19, 1988
6:30 P.M.
I
1
VII.
f), 7 S A.
5 B.
'SO c.
?33 D.
SI E.
AGENDA
I. 6:30 - ROLL CALL & PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE (Blue)
II. 6:35 - ADOPT AGENDA & APPROVAL OF MINUTES (Blue)
III. 6:45 - DEPARTMENT HEAD BUSINESS (Blue)
IV. 6:55 - CONSENT AGENDA (Pink)
I A. PERSONNEL ITEMS
� LI B. LICENSE, Plumbers
1 C. PROCLAMATION, Cities Week, May 1 -7, 1988
g D. PROCLAMATION, Eagan Night at the Twins, June 1, 1988
(0 E. FINAL PLAT, Blackhawk Ridge Addition
f7,2 F. FINAL PLAT, Schindeldecker 4th Addition (Fire Station #5)
0 4 G. PROJECT 515, Receive Feasibility Report /Order Public Hearing (South Dodd
,! Road - Overlay)
p /4/ H. PROJECT 539, Receive Petition /Order Feasibility Report & Detail Plans
I (Eagandale Center Industrial Park 10th Addition - Utilities)
p (S C I. PROJECT 480, Receive Final Assessment Roll /Order Public Hearing
(Eagandale Center Industrial Park - Overlay)
9 , (G J. PROJECT 501, Receive Final Assessment Roll /Order Public Hearing
`V (Eagandale Center Industrial Park 8th Addition - Watermain)
r1 K. FINAL PLAT, Eagandale Center Industrial Park No.9
F
k9 L. PROJECT 474, Receive Supplemental Assessment Roll /Order Public Hearing,
Eagandale -LeMay Lake 2nd Addition - Streets & Storm Sewer
V. 7:00 - PUBLIC HEARING (Salmon)
Z A. VACATE Partial Public Right -of -Way, Blackhawk Hills Road & Federal Drive
e
(Stoney Point Addition) Con't from 4/5/88
P - 21 B. PROJECT 529, Cliff Lake Center (Streets & Utilities)
( C. PROJECT 530, Kinder Care Addition (Watermain)
OLD BUSINESS (Orchid)
AGREEMENT, Joint Field Use, City of Eagan /Independent School District
#196
NEW BUSINESS (Tan)
APPOINTMENT to County Recycling Subcommittee
GAMBLING LICENSE, Pull -Tabs at Richard's Food & Liquor, St. John Neumann
Knights of Columbus
WAIVER OF PLAT, Kenneth Wason/Universal Builders, Lot 3, Block 2,
Oakwood Heights Addition, Duplex Lot Split to Allow Individual
Ownership
SPECIAL PERMIT, William and JoAnne Stassen, Temporary Mobile Home at 670
Lone Oak Road
VARIANCE, John J. Young, Lot 3, Block 2, Halley's 1st Addition, From
Curb Gutter and Paving Requirements and from 100' Rear Yard Setback from
A, P, or R District
p'`3 F. REZONING, Hosford Addition, John and Karen Hosford, of 5 A
(Agricultural) Acres to an R -1 (Single - Family) District and PRELIMINARY
C PLAT Containing 4 Lots Located South of Deerwood Drive
\O lG. PRELIMINARY PLAT, Northview Elementary /Independent School District #196,
for the 39.23 Acre Northview Elementary School Site Consisting of Two
Lots Located South of County Rd 30
(; H. COMPREHENSIVE GUIDE PLAN AMENDMENT, Country Hollow 2nd Addition/
Progress Land Company, REZONING of 13.53 A (Agricultural) Acres to an R-
1 (Single- Family) District, and PRELIMINARY PLAT Consisting of 32 Lots
((4
+ Locted North of County Road 30 and East of Country Hollow 1st Addition
1) I. REZONING, Bridle Ridge 2nd Addition /Sienna Corporation, of 166.00 A
(Agricultural) Acres to a Planned Development, R -1 (Single Family)
District, PRELIMINARY PLAT Containing 251 Lots, and VARIANCE for Cul -De-
Sacs in Excess of 500' Located South of Wescott Road and North or
n Northview Park Road
, JL IJ. REZONING, Stratford Oaks Addition /D.H.Gustafson & Ken Applebaum, of 1.9,
R -2 Acres (Outlot B) of the Thomas Lake Heights Addition to a Planned
Development (PD) District and AMENDMENT to the Eagan 40 PD to Include
Land for 328 Apartment Units and a PRELIMINARY PLAT Located South of
( County Road 30 and West of Thomas Lake Road
l0 4K. PRELIMINARY PLAT, Crystal Ponds /ASP Construction, of 13.7 R -4
(Multiple) Zoned Acres for 137 Apartment Units, and VARIANCE for Cul -De-
Sacs in Excess of 500' Located South of Highway 55
COMPREHENSIVE GUIDE PLAN AMENDMENT, Town Centre 100 Sixth
Addition /Federal Land Company, PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AMENDMENT (REZONING)
and PRELIMINARY PLAT of 7.3 LB (Limited Business) Zoned Acres Within the
Eagan Heights Commercial Park PD to a CSC (Community Shopping Center)
District, and CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT to Allow a Day Care Facility in
that district Located South of Town Centre Drive Along Duckwood Drive
PRELIMINARY PLAT, Eagandale Center Industrial Park 10th Addition Opus
Corporation, of 23.61 LI (Light Industrial) Acres Containing 2 Lots,
CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS for a Knox Lumber Facility With Outside Storage
on Lot 1, Block 1 and a Pylon Sign, and a SPECIAL PERMIT for a Fence
Over 6' Located North of Lone Oak Road and West of Lexington Avenue
CONSIDER Legal Services (City Attorney, Prosecution & Special Legal
Projects)
, -75 M.
,`,
X.
XI.
ADDITIONAL ITEMS (Gold)
PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT CONTRACTS:
CONTRACT 88 -1, Receive Bids /Award Contract (Fire Station #5)
CONTRACT 88 -3, Receive Bids /Award Contract (Wescott & Northview Park
Road - Surfacing)
CONTRACT 88 -14, Receive Bids /Award Contract (Briar Oaks of Apple Valley
- Trunk Storm & Sanitary Sewer)
CONTRACT 88 -9, Approve Plans /Authorize Advertisement for Bids (Manor
Lake Addition - Trunk Utilities)
CONTRACT 88 -19, Receive Bids /Award Contract (Well #5 - Pump Repair)
ADMINISTRATIVE AGENDA (Green)
VISITORS TO BE HEARD (for those persons not on agenda)
ADJOURNMENT
MEMO TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCILMEMBERS
FROM: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES
DATE: APRIL 13, 1988
SUBJECT: AGENDA INFORMATION FOR APRIL 19, 1988 CITY COUNCIL
MEETING
A. Personnel Items:
-ADOPT AGENDA APPROVE MINUTES
After approval is given to the April 19, 1988 agenda and regular
City Council meeting minutes for the April 5, 1988 meeting, the
following items are in order for consideration:
CONSENT'AGENDA
There are twelve (12) items on the agenda referred to as consent items
requiring one (1) motion by the City Council. If the City Council
wishes to discuss any of the items in further detail, those items
should be removed from the Consent Agenda and placed under
Additional Items unless the discussion required is brief.
PERSONNEL ITEMS
Item 1. Permanent Streets /Equipment Maintenance Worker -- A new
position for a Streets /Equipment Division Maintenance Worker in
the Public Works Department was authorized in the 1988 budget.
Over 475 applications were received for this position. These ap-
plications were screened and 36 applicants were invited to the
Eagan Municipal Center for a written test. They also were in-
structed to bring with them written answers to four questions
which were sent to them. From the results of this testing and
the answers to the written questions, the applicants were
screened down to seven finalists who were invited to the main-
tenance facility for an equipment operation test and a personal
interview. The interviews were conducted by Superintendent of
Streets /Equipment Erhart, Streets Supervisor Lundsten and Ad-
ministrative Assistant Duffy. It is their recommendation that
Emmett Cassidy be hired as a Streets /Equipment Division Main-
tenance Worker, subject to successful completion of the City's
physical examination requirement.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the hiring of
Emmett Cassidy as a permanent, full -time Streets /Equipment Divi-
sion Maintenance Worker in the Public Works Department for the
City of Eagan, subject to successful completion of the City's
physical examination requirement.
Agenda Information Memo
April 19, 1988, City Council Meeting
Item 2. Permanent Parks Maintenance Worker -- A new position for
a Parks Maintenance Worker in the Parks and Recreation Depart-
ment was authorized in the 1988 budget. Over 450 applications
were received for this positions. These applications were
screened and 41 applicants were invited to the Eagan Municipal
Center for a written test. They also were instructed to bring
with them written answers to four questions which were sent to
them. From the results of this testing and the answers to the
written questions, the applicants were screened down to ten
finalists who were invited to the maintenance facility for an
equipment operation test and a personal interview. The inter-
views were conducted by Parks and Recreation Director Vraa, Su-
perintendent of Parks VonDeLinde, Parks Supervisor McGuffee and
Administrative Assistant Duffy. It is their recommendation that
Alexander Lammer be hired as a Parks Maintenance Worker, subject
to successful completion of the City's physical examination
requirement.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the hiring of
Alexander Lammer as a permanent, full -time Parks Division Main-
tenance Worker in the Parks and Recreation Department for the
City of Eagan, subject to successful completion of the City's
physical examination requirement.
Item 3. Seasonal Utility Maintenance Worker -- A number of
seasonal utility maintenance workers were allotted in the 1988
budget. After reviewing applications and conducting interviews,
it is the recommendation of Superintendent of Utilities and
Buildings Connolly that Mark Dornseif be hired as one of those
seasonal workers for the summer season.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the hiring of
Mark Dornseif as a seasonal utility maintenance worker.
Item 4. Seasonal Park Maintenance Workers -- A number of
seasonal park maintenance workers were allotted in the 1988
budget. After reviewing applications and conducting interviews,
it is the recommendation of Superintendent of Parks VonDeLinde
that the following persons be hired as seasonal parks maintenance
workers (spring start): Kenneth Alexander, Peter Hafstad, Steven
Kivi, David Smith, and Rebecca Verwey.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the hiring of
Kenneth Alexander, Peter Hafstad, Steven Kivi, David Smith, and
Rebecca Verwey as seasonal park maintenance workers (spring
start).
Item 5. Seasonal Weed Inspector Aide -- After reviewing applica-
tions and conducting interviews, it is the recommendation of Su-
perintendent of Parks VonDeLinde that Thomas Fish be hired as the
seasonal Weed Inspector Aide for the 1988 weed season.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the hiring of
Thomas Fish as the seasonal Weed Inspector Aide for the 1988 weed
season.
Agenda Information Memo
April 19, 1988, City Council Meeting
Item 6. Public Service Agreement for Monitoring the Compost
Recycling Program Site -- As the Council is aware, the City cur-
rently operates a compost recycling program as part of its waste
management activities. When the programs's compost site is in
operation (late spring through fall seasons), a monitor is needed
on site. The City is proposing the execution of a public service
agreement between the City and Green View, Inc., to provide those
monitoring services. Green View, Inc., is a non - profit organiza-
tion which has a program through which needy, elderly persons are
recruited to provide public services. Green View, Inc., would be
responsible for recruiting and hiring all personnel, administrat-
ing the payroll and all fringe benefits and providing bonding for
the above mentioned personnel. Funding for this agreement will
be provided through dedicated funds from Dakota County for waste
abatement programs.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the public
service agreement between the City of Eagan and Green View, Inc.,
for the provision of monitoring services for the compost waste
site.
3
Agenda Information Memo
April 19, 1988, City Council Meeting
PLUMBERS LICENSES
B. Plumbers Licenses - -There are ten (10) plumbers licenses in
order for renewal. These licenses meet the regulatory
requirements of the City Code. Enclosed on page 5 is a list
of the licenses as applied for.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the list of
plumber licenses as presented.
•
PLUMBERS LICENSES APRIL 19, 1988
1. A -AACE Inc.
2. Alta Mechanical Contractors
3. ART Mechanical Inc.
4. Associated Mechanical Contractors, Inc.
5. Doody Mechanical, Inc.
6. Genz -Ryan Plumbing & Heating Co.
7. Robert B. Hill Company
8. Bruce Nelson Plumbing & Heating
9. Dale Sorenson Company
10. Swanson Plumbing & Heating
Agenda Information Memo
April 19, 1988, City Council Meeting
PROCLAMATION /CITIES WEEK, MAY 1 -7, 1988
C.. Proclamation for Cities Week, May 1 - 7, 1988 -- Enclosed on
page ,r1 is a proclamation declaring May 1 - 7, 1988, League of
Minnesota Cities Week. The City Administrator's office will
coordinate ceremonial activities that were directed by the City
Council at a previous meeting for the recognition of Cities Week.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the Cities Week
proclamation for May 1 - 7, 1988.
PROCLAMATION
CITY OF EAGAN
CITIES WEEK
MAY 1 - 7, 1988
WHEREAS, cities are a grass roots governmental system
which represents a close relationship between elected officials
and citizens; and
WHEREAS, approximately 80 percent of the people in
Minnesota choose to raise their families and make their homes
within our state's cities; and
WHEREAS, cities provide the basic services necessary to
insure the health, safety, and well being of the people -- services
such as water, streets, and polices and fire protection; and
WHEREAS, cities improve our quality of life by
furnishing recreational and cultural opportunities, environmental
protection, and a sense of community; and
WHEREAS, cities exhibit amazing versatility in finding
unique ways to cost effectively provide these services to their
residents; and
WHEREAS, cities are essential to the future protection
and development of our resources; and
WHEREAS, it is appropriate to recognize the work of city
officials, city employees, and volunteers in providing for the
economic growth and vitality of our communities;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that I, Vic Ellison,
Mayor of the City of Eagan, do hereby proclaim the first week in
May to be
MINNESOTA CITIES WEEK
and urge citizens to take this opportunity to learn more about
city government and how they can become more involved.
MOTION MADE BY:
SECONDED BY:
THOSE IN FAVOR:
THOSE OPPOSED:
CITY OF EAGAN
CITY COUNCIL
By:
Its Mayor
Attest:
Its Clerk
Agenda Information Memo
April 19, 1988, City Council Meeting
PROCLAMATION /EAGAN NIGHT AT THE TWINS
D. Proclamation for Eagan Night at the Twins, June 1, 1988 - -The
Dakota County Chamber of Commerce is requesting that its member
cities proclaim their respective cities day at the Twins on June
1, 1988. Enclosed on page 9 is a copy of the proclamation
entitled "Eagan Day at the Twins, June 1, 1988."
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the
proclamation for Eagan Day at the Twins.
9
WHEREAS, the Minnesota Twins have represented the
metropolitan area of the Twin Cities to the country through their
efforts; and
WHEREAS, the Chambers of Commerce of the Twin Cities
metropolitan area and throughout the State Minnesota have
benefitted from the success of the Minnesota Twins; and
WHEREAS, the Minnesota Twins have won the 1987 World
Series of Baseball and brought a more positive image to Minnesota
and the cities of this state; and
WHEREAS, the Chambers of Commerce of Northern Dakota
County wish to recognize the Minnesota Twins Baseball Club in
some meaningful manner; and
WHEREAS, the City of Eagan wishes to be part of this
recognition.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, I, Victor Ellison,
Mayor of Eagan, do hereby declare June 1, 1988, as "Eagan Day at
the Twins" and ask that the citizens of Eagan and members of the
Eagan Chamber of Commerce take part in recognizing the Minnesota
Twins by attending their baseball game that day.
Motion Made By:
Seconded By:
Those In Favor:
Those Opposed:
EAGAN DAY AT THE TWINS
June 1, 1988
Attest:
PROCLAMATION
CITY OF EAGAN
CITY COUNCIL
By:
Its Mayor
Its Clerk
CERTIFICATION
I, E.J.VanOverbeke, Clerk of the City of Eagan, Dakota
County, Minnesota, do hereby certify that the foregoing
resolution was duly passed and adopted by the City Council of
the City of Eagan, Dakota County, Minnesota, in a regular meeting
thereof assembled this th day of May, 1988.
E.J.VanOverbeke, City Clerk
City of Eagan
Agenda Information Memo
April 19, 1988, City Council Meeting
FINAL PLAT /BLACKHAWK RIDGE ADDN.
E. Approve Final Plat, Blackhawk Ridge Addition - -The staff has
received an application for final plat approval for the Blackhawk
Ridge Addition located south of Blackhawk Hills Road a d west of
I• -35E as shown by the plat map enclosed on page . All
conditions placed on the preliminary plat approval on September
15, 1987, have been satisfactorily complied with. All final plat
application materials have been submitted, reviewed by staff and
found to be in order for favorable Council action.
Similar to the Stoney Point final plat approval considered by
Council action on April 5, it is staff's recommendation that
although final plat approval will be granted by Council action,
the final plat documents not be released for recording at the
County until the legal description has been resolved regarding
the turnback of excess right -of -way acquired by MnDot for the
construction of the Federal Drive /Blackhawk Hills Road frontage
road as a part of the I -35E freeway construction.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the final plat
for the Blackhawk Ridge Addition and authorize the Mayor and City
Clerk to execute all related documents with the MnDot right -of-
way turnback and vacation of excess public right -of -way issue
resolved prior to release of documents for recording at the
County.
a.rot ' +a ar+.a►•
iy a ►V • 1za r . = N:u•tM1IUVeai M Val.117JIJ 71.0 rangy ,30Y
• a,. • .tom
C`2
aJ
LC )
N
-r
0
UJ
w
U
w
Agenda Information Memo
April 19, 1988, City Council Meeting
FINAL PLAT /SCHINDELDECKER 4TH ADDITION /(FIRE STA. #5)
F. Approve Final Plat, Schindeldecker Fourth Addition (Fire
Station #5) - -As a part of the development of Fire Station #5, the
City acquired the property owned by Lydia Schindeldecker, located
on the west side of Galaxie Avenue just north of the Berkshire
Pond Addition. Subsequently, it was appropriate for the City to
formally plat this property accluisition for recording at the
County. Enclosed on page 1 -' is a copy of the final plat
discussed herein.
All conditions of the preliminary plat approval of March 1, 1988,
have been satisfactorily complied with. Because this is being
platted as City property, no formal development agreement is
required.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the final plat
for the Schindeldecker Fourth Addition (Fire Station #5) and
authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute all related
documents for recording at the County.
10_
S
0
0
as
5t
e
2
2
., f laft
.4 Al t . : ,\
OO'49Z j 3- 90.10.OS
13
/ 7
M.90,J0.O - -
M
a
t; ;
, /v
O :$ ,
r
Agenda Information Memo
April 19, 1988, City Council Meeting
PROJ. 515 /FEASIBILITY REPORT /PUBLIC HEARING /(DODD ROAD - OVERLAY)
G. Project 515, Receive Feasibility Report /Order Public Hearing
(Dodd Road - Overlay): - -At the July 21, 1987 Council meeting the
Council received a petition from various property owners along
Dodd Road south of Cliff Road requesting cost estimates to
overlay Dodd Road. This feasibility report has now been
completed and is being presented to the Council in consideration
of scheduling a formal public hearing for May 17th.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To receive the feasibility
report for Project 515 (south Dodd Road - overlay) and schedule a
public hearing to be held at 7:00 p.m. on May 17, 1988.
PROJ. 539 /PETITION /FEASIBILITY REPORT & DETAILED PLANS/
(EAGANDALE CENTER INDUSTRIAL PARK 10TH ADDITION- UTILITIES)
H. Project 539, Receive Petition /Order Feasibility Report and
Detailed Plans (Eagandale Center Industrial Park 10th Addition -
Utilities)- -The staff has received a petition requesting the
preparation of the feasibility report necessary for the public
hearing process for the installation of the utilities necessary
to service the above - referenced subdivision proposed for the Knox
Lumber Development on Lexington Avenue, north of Lone Oak Road.
Incorporated with the petition is a request for the simultaneous
preparation of detailed plans to facilitate the bidding and
construction. The appropriate waiver of hearing and guarantee
for all costs incurred was executed along with the petition.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To receive the petition
for Project 539 (Eagandale Center Industrial Park 10th Addition -
Utilities) and authorize the preparation of a feasibility report
along with detailed plans.
Agenda Information Memo
April 19, 1988, City Council Meeting
PROJ. 480 /FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL /PUBLIC HEARING
(EAGANDALE CENTER INDUSTRIAL PARK - OVERLAY)
I. Project 480, Receive Final Assessment Roll /Order Public
Hearing (Eagandale Center Industrial Park- Overlay) -- Project 480,
as approved by the public hearing held on August 4, 1987, was
constructed under Contract 87 -18 providing for the structural
overlay within the Eagandale Center Industrial Park 1st through
8th Additions. All final construction costs and related overhead
have been tabulated and the related final assessment roll has now
been completed. It is being presented to the City Council in
consideration of scheduling a formal public hearing to present
these final costs for official certification.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To receive the final
assessment roll for Project 480 (Eagandale Center Industrial Park
- Overlay) and schedule the final assessment public hearing to be
held at 7:00 p.m. on May 17, 1988.
Agenda Information Memo
April 19, 1988, City Council Meeting
PROJ.501 /FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL /PUBLIC HEARING
(EAGANDALE CTR. INDUSTRIAL PK. 8TH ADDN. -WATER MAIN)
J. Project 501, Receive Final Assessment Roll /Order Public
Hearing (Eagandale Center Industrial Park 8th Addition - Water
Main) -- Project 501, as approved by Council action on June 16,
1987, was completed under Contract 87 -20 providing for the
installation of water main laterals. All final construction
costs and related overhead have been tabulated and the final
assessment roll completed. It is now being presented to the City
Council in consideration of scheduling a formal public hearing to
present these final assessment costs for certification.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To receive the final
assessment roll for Project 501, (Eagandale Center Industrial
Perk 8th Addition - Water Main) and schedule the final assessment
public hearing for 7:00 p.m., May 17, 1988.
Agenda Information Memo
April 19, 1988, City Council Meeting
FINAL PLAT /EAGANDALE CENTER INDUSTRIAL PARK NO. 9
K. Approve Final Plat, Eagandale Center Industrial Park No. 9 --
The staff has received an application for final plat approval for
the Eagandale Center Industrial Park No. 9 located south of Lone
Oak Ro and east of 35E as shown by the plat map enclosed on
page X All conditions placed on the preliminary plat
approval on December 17, 1987, have been satisfactorily complied
with. All final plat application materials have been submitted,
reviewed by staff and found to be in order for favorable Council
action.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the final plat
for the Eagandale Center Industrial Park No. 9 and authorize the
Mayor and City Clerk to execute all related documents.
A ; ' il a
f . ?k 1 8
I lilt a
1 - I I •
I , z----=.--(to
ie. I Ili li
! I CO I IOC 1 °
‘7‘.11
NO_LE.
8 r-
1
I 1 217 ON
v •—* 7ms go
e
dosfi 1111. AO IV •
1
- - -
3. MANY
4
Agenda Information Memo
April 19, 1988, City Council Meeting
PROJ 474 /SUPPLEMENTAL ASSMT ROLL /PUBLIC HEARING /EAGANDALE LEMAY
LK 2ND ADDN
L. Project 474, Receive Supplemental Assessment Roll /Order
Public Hearing (Eagandale LeMay Lake 2nd Addition (Streets &
Storm Sewer) - -On August 18, 1987, the final assessment roll for
the above - referenced project was formally presented at a public
hearing and subsequently adopted for certification to the County.
However, it has since been discovered that the final assessment
amount for the street and storm sewer improvements under this
project did not properly incorporate the related overhead costs
in addition to the construction costs. The sanitary sewer and
water main laterals constructed under this project properly
incorporated the overhead's cost as a part of the final
assessment figures.
Therefore, it is necessary to hold a supplemental assessment
hearing for these unassessed overhead costs related to the storm
sewer and street improvements. While the original assessment was
spread over 10 years, it is recommended that the supplemental
assessments be spread over 9 years at the same rate of interest
to ensure that the total collection is in conformance with the
original bond issue repayment schedule.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To receive the final
assessment roll for supplemental assessments to Project 474
(Eagandale LeMay Lake 2nd Addition - Storm Sewer & Streets) and
schedule a public hearing to be held on May 17, 1988.
0
Agenda Information Memo
April 19, 1988, City Council Meeting
PUBLIC HEARINGS
VACATION /BLACKHAWK HILLS RD & FEDERAL DRIVE
A. Vacate Partial Public Right -of -Way, Blackhawk Hills Road &
Federal Drive - -On April 5, a public hearing was held to discuss
the vacation of a portion of the Blackhawk Hills and Federal
Drive right -of -way reconveyed to the City from MnDOT as a part of
the I -35E frontage road construction. However, due to a
discrepancy in title description of the original underlying
right -of -way conveyance, this public hearing was continued until
April 19 to resolve the issue. On April 19, the Public Works
Director will provide additional information regarding the status
of this issue necessary for the approval of this partial vacation
of right -of -way petition.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To close the public
hearing and approve /continue the vacation of excess public right -
of -way for Blackhawk Hills Road and Federal Drive.
ao
Agenda Information Memo
April 19, 1988, City Council Meeting
PROJECT 529, CLIFF LAKE CTR
B. Project 529, Cliff Lake Centre (Streets & Utilities) - -On
March 1, the Feasibility Report was presented to the Council with
an informal presentation by staff occurring at the March 15
Council meeting. Subsequently, a formal public hearing was
scheduled for April 19 to present the details asssociated with
the installation of public improvements necessary to service the
proposed Cliff Lake Galleria development north of Cliff Road
between Rahn Road and Blackhawk Road.
Enclosed on pages A through ( is a copy of the
Feasibility Report that will be reviewed in detail by the
ccnsulting engineering firm responsible for the report's
preparation.
All notices have been published in the legal newspaper and sent
to all property owners proposed to be assessed under this project
informing them of the April 19 public hearing.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To close the public
hearing and approve /modify /deny Project 529 (Cliff Lake Centre -
Streets & Utilities).
a\
FEASIBILITY STUDY
CLIFF LAKE CENTRE
UTILITY AND STREET IMPROVEMENT
CITY PROJECT NO. 529
March 1, 1988
I hereby certify that this report was prepared
by me or under my direct supervision and that I
am a duly Registered Professional En•ineer under
the law of the S ate of Minn- ota
DATE: March 1, 1988
SEH FILE NO: 88143
REG. NO.
REVIEWED BY: 5 yfd // &7> lz/
DATE: 3- /4 -83
APPROVED BY:
blic Works Department
blic Works
DATE: 3 - a 3-
i
12121
TITLE PAGE
CERTIFICATION
LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL
TABLE OF CONTENTS
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PAGE NO.
SCOPE 4
FEASIBILITY AND RECOMMENDATIONS 4
DISCUSSION 5
Sanitary Sewer 5
Watermain 5
Storm Sewer 6
Streets 8
EASEMENTS AND PERMITS 11
PROJECT AREA 12
COST ESTIMATES 12
ASSESSMENTS 13
Sanitary Sewer 13
Watermain 14
Storm Sewer 15
Street Improvements 15
Trunk Assessments 16
Revenue Sources 17
PROJECT SCHEDULE 19
APPENDIX A - PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATES A - 1
APPENDIX B - ASSESSMENT ROLL & SUMMARY B - 1
ENGINEERS • ARCHITECTS • PLANNERS
March 1, 1988
Honorable Mayor and City Council
City of Eagan
3830 Pilot Knob Road
Eagan, MN 55121
222 EAST LITTLE CANADA ROAD, ST PAUL, MINNESOTA 55117 612 484-0272
Attn: Thomas Colbert, Director of Public Works
RE: EAGAN, MINNESOTA
CLIFF LAKE CENTRE IMPROVEMENTS
CITY PROJECT NO. 529
SEH FILE NO: 88143
Enclosed is our report for construction of all public improve-
ments necessary to serve the Cliff Lake Centre Development.
The proposed improvements are feasible and will benefit the
properties served. Estimated costs and a preliminary assessment
roll are included in the report.
We will be pleased to meet with you and any interested parties at
your convenience to discuss the contents of this report.
DRB /cih
Enclosure
SHORT ELLIOTT
HENDRICKSON INC
ST PAUL
MINNESOTA
Sincerely,
J •
aniel R. Box'ud
CHIPPEWA FALLS,
WISCONSIN
SCOPE
This project provides for the construction of sanitary sewer,
watermain, storm sewer, and streets to serve the proposed Cliff
Lake Centre Development (See Drawing No. 1). The Cliff Lake
Centre Addition includes approximately 99.9 acres located at the
northwest corner of Cliff Road and I -35E. This area is zoned PD
(Planned Development). The parcels east and south of proposed
Cliff Lake Drive will all be used for commercial purposes. The
parcels west and north of proposed Cliff Lake Drive will all be
used for multiple residential purposes. Cliff Lake Drive will be
on the Municipal State -Aid (MSA) street system. Rahn Road,
currently on the MSA system, will be realigned to connect to
Cliff Lake Drive. All improvements will be worked around this
general service network.
FEASIBILITY AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Based on our study, it is concluded that:
1. The total estimated project cost is $2,250,885.
2. This project is feasible from an engineering standpoint and
will benefit the properties served.
3. The proposed project is in accordance with the City's master
street plan and master utility plans with the modifications
noted.
It is recommended that:
1. The improvements proposed should be constructed as proposed
herein.
2. Proposed assessments should be checked by an appraiser to be
sure the proposed assessment does not exceed the benefit to
the parcels, unless waivers to the proposed assessments are
received from all benefiting parties.
- 4 -
3. This project can best be carried out in three contracts.
Grading and underground utilities for the internal portion
of the project area would be one contract. This would allow
the utility work to be underway while some of the details of
the street design are in the approval process. A second
contract would be let for Cliff Lake Drive and Cliff Road
street construction, landscaping and the traffic signal
construction. Dakota Electric Association would perform the
street lighting installation as the third contract.
DISCUSSION
Sanitary Sewer
The sanitary sewers as proposed as part of this project are
shown on Drawing No. 2. Included are all of the 8" and 10"
laterals necessary to serve the Phase I commercial areas,
that being lots 1, 2, 3, and Outlot A. Additional sanitary
sewers will be extended as private services. The future
commercial development on Outlot E and the future multiple
family development on Outlot B would be provided initial
service at this time, with future extensions possible as
necessary to match exact development layouts.
Sanitary sewer service to Outlots C and D can be provided by
future connections to the existing 18" trunk sewer along the
north side. Therefore, no service is proposed under this
project.
Watermain
Watermains as proposed as a part of the project are shown on
Drawing No. 3. The 16" trunk watermain in and adjacent to
Cliff Lake Drive will connect to the existing 16" trunk
watermain at the intersection of Cliff Road and Rahn Road,
the 16" watermain in Blackhawk Road just south of Bear Path
Trail, and the 12" watermain in Beaver Dam Road. This will
complete the trunk watermain system in this vicinity.
- 5 -
3LQ
The Master Water Plan predicts that the water pressure
available to the development will be as follows:
Location Static Pressure Residual Pressure
Cliff & Rahn Rds. 58.0 32.5
Cliff Lake Drive
at 12" Main 65.0 39.0
An 8" watermain will be looped around the south and east
sides of the stores in Phase I for fire protection purposes.
Additional hydrant leads will be located throughout the site
off the 16" and 8" mains.
Outlot E will be provided with two 8" watermain stubs for
internal looping. In addition, a third connection can be
made, if necessary, through the most northerly 8" watermain
in the Phase I commercial area. Internal service to the
multiple family residential area on Outlot D, can be made by
a watermain loop from Blackhawk Road to the watermain
connection leading to Beaver Dam Road, or to the individual
stubs provided from the 16" watermain in Cliff Lake Drive.
The Federal Land Company parcel (011 -76) at Cliff Road and
Cliff Lake Drive will be provided with an 8" stub and
hydrant for future looping through the parcel.
Additional watermains will be extended to the individual
buildings by the developers as private services.
Storm Sewer
This project is in the Gun Club Lake Water Management
Organization jurisdiction. However, its Management Plan is
not yet complete, so no specific requirements are
applicable.
6
As shown on Drawing No. 4, storm water will be routed so as
to minimize impact on Cliff Lake and the downstream drainage
system. No developed areas from this project will drain to
Cliff Lake. All drainage will be to the smaller ponds to
the north and west of Cliff Lake Drive.
The following has been determined by the City to be the
necessary ponding criteria:
REQUIRED
POND STORAGE VOLUME OUTFLOW
DESIGNATION (ACRE /FT) (CUBIC FEET PER SECOND)
AP -11 (Cliff Lake) 83 6.55 (Proposed)
AP-22 21.3 5.0 (Existing)
AP -23 29.6 5.5 (Existing)
AP -24 5.2 22.0 (Proposed)
AP -25 28.0 3.31 (Proposed)
Modifications to these requirements may be requested by the
developer and will be considered on their merits.
Ponds AP -24 and AP -25 will be constructed as part of this
project. Ponds AP -22 and AP -23 need to be upgraded when
Outlots D or E develop.
In addition to the required storage volume for storm water
rate control, pond AP -25 will be excavated below the outlet
pipe for purposes of nutrient removal.
The storm sewer sizes have been tentatively designed based
on the developers current plans. Final sizes will be
dictated by final construction plans.
The proposed public storm sewers shown on Drawing No. 4 are
those storm sewers which drain public right -of -way or serve
more than one parcel. Additional storm sewer extensions and
connections are anticipated to be made by the developers of
the various parcels as they develop. Outlot E, in
- 7 -
particular, will need an extensive internal storm sewer in
order to drain all of the area which will develop to the
proposed storm sewer in Cliff Lake Drive. This will protect
Cliff Lake and route the storm water to pond AP -23. Outlot
B will drain directly to pond AP -25. Most of Outlot C will
drain directly to pond AP -24. Most of Outlot D will drain
directly to ponds AP -22 and AP -23. The various drainage
areas to each storm sewer are shown on Drawing No. 4.
Streets - Internal
Cliff Lake Drive will be a new MSA collector street. It
will connect Cliff Road and Blackhawk Road. It will follow
existing Rahn Road from the Cliff Road intersection north
about 300 feet, then curve east and follow a new alignment
(See Drawing No. 5).
Rahn Road will be realigned as part of this project. It
will be reconnected to Cliff Lake Drive as shown on Drawing
No. 5. Rahn Road will be discontinued as a street adjacent
to Rahn Park to the west of Outlot B. A portion of
existing Rahn Road is proposed to be utilized as a parking
lot for Rahn Park. The remainder of Rahn Road between the
Federal Land Company parcel and the proposed parking lot
will be covered with soil and seeded. The possibility
exists that it will be converted in the future to additional
parking for Rahn Park or a park access road. The exact
disposition of this segment of Rahn Road will need to be
determined by a recommendation of the Advisory Park and
Recreational Commission and subsequent City Council action.
Both Cliff Lake Drive and realigned Rahn Road are proposed
to be built to MSA standards. The appropriate turn lanes
and medians on Cliff Lake Drive, as determined during the
development review process, are shown on Drawing No. 5. The
median opening in Cliff Lake Drive at Rahn Road will allow
left turns from Cliff Lake Drive to Rahn Road in order to
receive MSA approval.
As part of the street construction, all grading associated
with the Rahn Road realignment including the new
construction of Cliff Lake Drive at Cliff Road will be part
of this project. In addition, grading of Cliff Lake Drive
adjacent to Outlot E will be part of this project. The
center portion of Cliff Lake Drive will be graded by the
developer. It is proposed that the City's contractor will
take over any erosion control established by the developer
and supplement it as necessary for the remainder of the
project.
The soils report on the site obtained by the developer
indicates that the soils have a strength factor estimated at
an R -value of 30. An actual R -value of the soil will be
necessary for preparation of construction plans. Based on
the projected traffic and a R -value of 30, the pavement
sections shown on Drawing No. 6 would be necessary.
Drawing No. 6 also shows the width of the proposed roadways
along with the sidewalks, boulevards, and islands. Where
left turn lanes will be constructed, the islands will be
concrete, either with a separate curb and concrete surface
or a monolithic 4 foot island. Where left turn lanes are
not proposed, the medians will be landscaped with a
maintenance free vegetation under this Contract. All
boulevards will be topsoiled and sodded as part of the City
project.
As part of the City project for Cliff Lake Drive, signals
will be constructed at the main entrance to the Target Store
on Lot 3.
In anticipation of the possibility of other traffic signals
being needed along Cliff Lake Drive in the future, conduit
systems would be installed at Blackhawk Road, the main
1.
entrance to Outlot E, and the entrance to Cub Foods on Lot
Signing and striping will also be included under this
project. Rahn Road will be striped for two lanes of traffic
with parking allowed on each side. Cliff Lake Drive will be
striped for four lanes of traffic along with the appropriate
right and left turn lanes, with no parking allowed. Street
lights will be installed under this project by Dakota
Electric Association in accordance with a layout being
proposed by the developer.
Streets - Cliff Road
To accommodate this new development, Cliff Road is proposed
to be modified by adding a 400 foot westbound right turn
lane (with curb) onto Cliff Lake Drive. (See Drawing No.
5). Cliff Road west of the intersection is proposed to be
widened from 48 feet to 68 feet for a distance of 300 feet
(plus tapers) to accommodate a painted channelized left turn
lane for eastbound traffic onto Cliff Lake Drive. No curbs
would be installed. In addition, Rahn Road south of Cliff
Road will need to be widened from 48 feet to 54 feet for a
distance of about 250 feet south of Cliff Road. A concrete
median would be constructed to channelize traffic so as to
properly line up with the multiple lanes of Cliff Lake
Drive.
Traffic signals will be required at the intersection of
Cliff Lake Drive and Cliff Road with the County
participating in fifty percent (50 %) of the cost in
accordance with their present policies.
Ultimate improvements to Cliff Road are difficult to
project. The Cliff Lake Centre Development will contribute
a share of increased traffic. But, the increased traffic
will also come from other adjacent development and from
general growth in traffic. A county wide transportation
plan now being prepared will provide an estimate of total
future traffic on Cliff Road and permit a determination of
needed roadway improvements.
Estimates of future traffic and of traffic generated by the
Cliff Lake Centre Development indicate about 10% of all
traffic on Cliff Road west of Rahn Road will come from the
Cliff Lake Centre Development. The estimate for Cliff Road
east of Blackhawk Road is 7% and between Rahn Road and I -35E
is 25 %. These estimates also indicate a need for three thru
lanes and one left turn and one right turn lane at each
intersection on Cliff Road from Rahn Road to Blackhawk Road.
However, until the county plan is complete, estimated
traffic is not accurate enough to specifically forecast
ultimate Cliff Road improvements.
EASEMENTS AND PERMITS
It is anticipated that all right -of -way and easements will be
acquired at no cost to the City. The developer of Cliff Lake
Centre will dedicate the necessary right -of -way and easements on
the final
for Cliff
at Cliff
exchanged
Minnesota
Minnesota
Minnesota
Minnesota
plat. It is anticipated that a 15 foot wide easement
Lake Drive will be necessary from Federal Land Company
Lake Road. However, this taking could possibly be
for the excess right -of -way generated by removal of a
portion of Rahn Road adjacent to Cliff Lake Drive.
Permits anticipated to be necessary include the following:
Pollution Control Agency
Agency Sanitary Sewer Extension Permit
Department of Health
Watermain Extension Permit
Department of Natural Resources
Outlet Control Structure Permit
Department of Transportation
Right -of -Way Permit
3�-
Metropolitan Waste Control Commission
- Sanitary Sewer Extension Permit
Dakota County Highway Department
- Right -of -Way Permit
PROJECT AREA
The following properties would benefit by this improvement and
are proposed to be assessed:
Current Parcel Numbers For
After Platting: Notification Process:
Cliff Lake Centre Plat
Lot 1, Block 1 S.W. 1/4, Section 29
Lot 2, Block 1 Parcel 012 -50
Lot 3, Block 1 Parcel 013 -51
Outlot A
Outlot B
Outlot C
Outlot D
Outlot E
S.E. 1/4, Section 30 S.E. 1/4, Section 30
Parcel 011 -76 Parcel 011 -76
COST ESTIMATES
Detailed cost estimates are presented in Appendix A located at
the back of this report. The cost estimates include the
appropriate contingency and overhead factors. A summary of these
costs is as follows:
Contract 1
A. Grading for Ponds AP -24 and AP -25 $ 229,359
B. Grading for Street Construction 51,473
C. Sanitary Sewer 119,093
D. Watermain 419,692
E. Storm Sewer 339,222
Total $1,158,839
- 12 -
33
Contract 2
A. Cliff Lake Drive $ 561,721
B. Cliff Road 55,725
C. Traffic Signals 210,000
D. Landscaping 60,375
Total $ 887,821
Contract 3
A. Street Lighting $ 204,225
Total Project Cost Contracts 1 through 3 $2,250,885
ASSESSMENTS
Assessable costs will be based on final construction costs plus
related overhead expenses (estimated at 25 %) or on the comparable
zoning equivalent rate as identified in the 1988 Fee Schedule.
They will also be based on the dimensions contained in the final
plat recorded at Dakota County. It is proposed that the
assessment would be spread over 20 years at a rate of interest
determined by the bond sale necessary to finance these
improvements.
Sanitary Sewer
Trunk area sanitary sewer has previously been assessed under
project 64. Any additional trunk assessments or additional
lateral benefit from existing trunk sanitary sewer are to be
levied separately as a condition of replatting the benefited
outlots in the future.
All sanitary sewer under this project is considered lateral
and is proposed to be 100% assessed. It is proposed to
assess sanitary sewer on an area basis (excluding ponding
areas) to Lots 1 through 3, Block 1, and Outlots A, B, and
E. The assessment for Outlot E is proposed to be levied
only for the cost of the 8" sanitary sewer extended to it
from the 10" sanitary sewer in Cliff Lake Drive. Extensive
extensions within Outlot E will be necessary when it
develops. The other lots indicated above would all be
assessed the same rate per acre.
Outlots C and D can be served from the existing trunk
sanitary sewer along the north border and would be assessed
at the appropriate benefit rate from the trunk sanitary
sewer at the time they are platted. This rate is currently
$31.70 per centerline foot, or $15.85 per frontage foot.
Watermain
Trunk watermain has previously been assessed under Project
64. Any additional trunk area assessment necessitated by a
change of land use will be levied separately as a condition
of the developer's agreement.
Although a maximum 12" watermain is necessary for this
development, the 16" watermain proposed as a part of this
project is required by the City's Master Water Plan.
Accordingly, the oversizing cost is the responsibility of
the trunk watermain fund.
All other mains proposed as part of this project are
considered lateral mains. The Federal Land Company parcel
(011 - 76) has not yet been assessed for lateral benefit from
trunk watermain. It is proposed to assess that parcel on a
frontage basis in accordance with the City's current Fee
Schedule. Lateral benefit from a trunk watermain is
currently established at $43.20 per centerline foot or
$21.60 per front foot.
It is proposed to assess the remainder of the lateral
watermain costs equally on an area basis to all lots and
outlots. Ponding areas would be excluded. In addition, the
assessment area of Outlot E would be decreased to 80% of the
lot area due to the extensive internal watermain looping
anticipated to be necessary in the future when it develops.
- 14 -
jS
Storm Sewer
The properties affected by this development have not yet
been assessed for trunk storm sewer. It is proposed to
assess all of the lots and outlots in Cliff Lake Centre,
exclusive of ponding areas. Assessments would be levied at
the current rates of $0.07 per square foot for the multiple
family parcels, or $3,049.20 per acre. The rate for the
commercial properties would be $0.083 per square foot, or
$3,615.48 per acre.
Trunk storm sewers constructed as a part of this project
would include the outlet pipes from Cliff Lake, Pond AP -25
and Pond AP -24 to the existing storm sewer at the northwest
corner of the plat. These costs would be paid for by the
trunk storm sewer fund.
The equivalent cost of the storm sewer system necessary to
provide street drainage would be assessed as part of the
street assessment. The oversizing cost of that storm sewer
system and all other internal public storm sewer and ponding
costs would be considered lateral storm sewer. Lateral
storm sewer is proposed to be assessed based on the final
costs on an area basis for the area drained. An exception
to this would be that Outlot E would be only assessed 80% of
the drainagA area due to the need for extensive internal
storm sewer extensions when the parcel develops. The
assessment rate for the commercial properties would be 20%
higher than the rate for the multiple family areas, which is
comparable to City policy for lateral benefits from a trunk
storm sewer.
Street Improvements
Rahn Road has previously been assessed at the rates which
were appropriate at that time. Accordingly, the Federal
Land Company parcel (011 -76) will not be assessed as part of
this project. No assessments have yet been levied for past
improvements to Cliff Road.
It is proposed to assess 100% of the internal street cost to
the abutting properties. Included in the street assessment
would be street grading, street construction, street
drainage, median landscaping, and street lighting. The
multiple family area would be assessed at a front foot rate
of $90.20 in accordance with the City of Eagan 1988 Fee
Schedule. The balance of the street costs would be spread
uniformly to the buildable portions of the commercial
property along Cliff Lake Drive on an area basis.
The total cost of the sidewalks would be assessed equally to
both sides of the street over the same frontage as the
street. An exception would be the Federal Land Company
parcel (011 -76) as it is presently served with sidewalk.
The Cliff Lake Drive traffic signals at the entrance to the
Target Store would be assessed to Lots 1, 2 and 3, and
Outlot A, as they are the parcels able to make use of the
signals. An assessment would be levied on an area basis for
the developable portions of the parcels. An indirect
benefit rate would be levied to Lots 1, 2 and Outlot A, with
the remainder of the cost levied against Lot 3.
Dakota County will share in the cost of improvements to
Cliff Road. Dakota County's share will include 50% of the
traffic signal construction and 55% of the lane widening
west of Rahn Road. All other costs become the
responsibility of the Major Street Fund. The Cliff Lake
Centre Development will contribute toward that fund through
a condition in the developer's agreement requiring a waiver
of rights for an assessment of $111.70 per front foot, the
1988 Fee Schedule rate for street assessments for commercial
and industrial properties.
37
- 16 -
r �
. •
Trunk Assessments
Trunk assessment rates will be assessed based on the rates
in affect at the time of the public hearing. Trunk assess-
ment rates proposed to be assessed as part of this project
are listed below:
Storm Sewer
Trunk Area:
Multiple Family: $0.07 per square foot = $3,049.20
per acre.
Commercial /Industrial: $0.083 per square foot =
$3,615.48 per acre.
Revenue Sources
Revenue sources to cover the cost of this project are the
various trunk funds (including Major Street Fund), direct
assessment to the benefiting properties, and participation
by Dakota County in improvements to Cliff Road. All
contracts within this project would be combined for
assessment purposes as follows:
- 17 -
Item
A. Sanitary Sewer:
Lateral Cost
Lateral Assess.
Total
B. Watermain:
Lateral Cost
Lateral Assess.
Trunk Cost
Total
C. Storm Sewer:
Lateral Cost
Trunk St. Swr.
Pond Const.
Lateral Assess.
Trunk Assess.
Total
E. Sidewalk:
Cost
Assessment
Total
Project
Cost
$ 119,093
$ 119,093 $ 119,093
$ 357,384
62,308
$ 419,692
$ 143,381
89,861
229,359
$ 462,601
$ 87,885
G. Cliff Rd. (CSAH 32)
Improvements:
Widening, Etc. $ 55,725
Traffic Sig. 105,000
County Part.
Total $ 160,725
$ 119,093
$ 357,384
-0-
$ 357,384
$ 372,740
251,376
$ 624,116
D. Streets (Internal):
Str. Grading $ 51,473
Str. Const. 561,721
Less Sdwlk. - 87,885
Str. Drainage 105,980
Med. Landscpg. 60,375
Str. Lighting 204,225
Str. Assess. $ 895,889
Total $ 895,889 $ 895,889
$ 87,885
$ 87,885 $ 87,885
F. Cliff Lake Drive
Traffic Signals:
Cost $ 105,000
Assessment $ 105,000
Total $ 105,000 $ 105,000
- 18 -
Impact on Trunk
Revenue Funds
$ 66,500
$ 66,500
-0-
-$ 62,308
+$161,515
$ -0-
$ -0-
$ -0-
-$ 94,225
H. Total Project $2,250,885 $2,255,867 +$ 4,982
PROJECT SCHEDULE
Present Feasibility Report
Public Hearing
Approve Plans and Specifications
Open Bids
Award Contract
Construction Begins
Construction Completion
Final Assessment Hearing
First Payment Due with Real
Estate Taxes
Street,
Signals,
Grading & Landscaping
Utilities Etc.
Contract 1 Contract 2
3 -15 -88 3 -15 -88
4 -19 -88 4 -19 -88
4 -19 -88 5 -17 -88
5 -24 -88 6 -14 -88
6 -7 -88 6 -21 -88
6 -27 -88 7 -18 -88
9 -2 -88 10 -15 -88
Spring, 1989 Spring, 1989
5 -90
5 -90
APPENDIX A
PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATES
CLIFF LAKE CENTRE
UTILITY AND STREET IMPROVEMENTS
PROJECT NO. 529
A. GRADING FOR PONDS AP -24 AND AP -25
CONTRACT I
DESCRIPTION UNIT QTY. UNIT PRICE TOTAL
AP -24 - COMMON EXCAVATION C.Y. 11,500 1.50 17,250.00
AP -25 - COMMON EXCAVATION C.Y. 95,000 1.50 142,500.00
- SEEDING ACRE 6 2500.00 15,000.00
SUBTOTAL
+5% CONTINGENCIES
ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COST
25% LEGAL, ENGINEERING, ADMIN. & BOND INTEREST
B. GRADING FOR STREET CONSTRUCTION
174,750.00
8,737.50
183,487.50
45,871.88
TOTAL ESTIMATED PRICE 229,359.38
DESCRIPTION UNIT QTY. UNIT PRICE TOTAL
COMMON EXCAVATION C.Y. 25,145 1.50 37,717.50
SEEDING ACRE 0.6 2500.00 1,500.00
SUBTOTAL 39,217.50
+5% CONTINGENCIES 1,960.88
ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COST 41,178.38
25% LEGAL, ENGINEERING, ADMIN. & BOND INTEREST 10,294.59
TOTAL ESTIMATED PRICE 51,472.97
C. SANITARY SEWER
DESCRIPTION UNIT QTY. UNIT PRICE TOTAL
8" PVC SANITARY SEWER, INPLACE L.F. 2,655 17.00 45,135.00
10" PVC SANITARY SEWER, INPLACE L.F. 1,205 20.00 24,100.00
STANDARD 4' DIA. MANHOLE W /CASTING EACH 13 950.00 12,350.00
MANHOLE DEPTH GREATER THAN 8' DEEP L.F. 75 80.00 6,000.00
8" DIP OUTSIDE DROP L.F. 7 120.00 840.00
10" X 8" WYE BRANCH EACH 2 81.12 162.24
CONNECT 8" TO EXISTING MANHOLE EACH 2 325.00 650.00
ROCK STABILIZATION BELOW PIPE C.Y. 150 10.00 1,500.00
CONNECT TO EXISTING 24" RCP EACH 1 500.00 500.00
SUBTOTAL 90,737.24
+5% CONTINGENCIES 4,536.86
ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COST 95,274.10
+25% LEGAL, ENGINEERING, ADMIN. & BOND INTEREST 23,818.53
TOTAL ESTIMATED PRICE 119,092.63
D. WATERMAIN
16" DIP WATERMAIN, INPLACE
12" DIP WATERMAIN, INPLACE
8" DIP WATERMAIN, INPLACE
6" DIP WATERMAIN, INPLACE
HYDRANT, INPLACE
16" BUTTERFLY VALVE AND BOX
12" RESILIENT WEDGE GATE VALVE & BOX
8" RESILIENT WEDGE GATE VALVE & BOX
6" RESILIENT WEDGE GATE VALVE & BOX
FITTINGS, INPLACE
CONNECT TO EXISTING 12" DIP
CONNECT TO EXISTING 16" DIP
ROCK STABILIZATION BELOW PIPE
SUBTOTAL
+5% CONTINGENCIES
DESCRIPTION
L.F.
L.F.
L.F.
L.F.
EACH
EACH
EACH
EACH
EACH
LBS.
EACH
EACH
C.Y.
ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COST
+25% LEGAL, ENGINEERING, ADMIN. & BOND INTEREST
TOTAL ESTIMATED PRICE
UNIT QTY. UNIT PRICE TOTAL
4,650
655
5,000
800
25
3
1
6
25
20,000
1
2
150
32.00
23.00
15.50
12.00
950.00
1650.00
850.00
550.00
450.00
1.10
400.00
400.00
10.00
148,800.00
15,065.00
77,500.00
9,600.00
23,750.00
4,950.00
850.00
3,300.00
11,250.00
22,000.00
400.00
800.00
1,500.00
319,765.00
15,988.25
335,753.25
83,938.31
419,691.56
E. STORM SEWER
SUBTOTAL
+5% CONTINGENCIES
DESCRIPTION UNIT QTY. UNIT PRICE TOTAL
42" RCP STORM SEWER, INPLACE L.F. 140 80.00 11,200.00
36" RCP STORM SEWER, INPLACE L.F. 150 60.00 9,000.00
33" RCP STORM SEWER, INPLACE L.F. 785 50.00 39,250.00
30" RCP STORM SEWER, INPLACE L.F. 220 40.00 8,800.00
27" RCP STORM SEWER, INPLACE L.F. 335 35.00 11,725.00
24" RCP STORM SEWER, INPLACE L.F. 140 30.00 4,200.00
21" RCP STORM SEWER, INPLACE L.F. 970 26.00 25,220.00
18" RCP STORM SEWER, INPLACE L.F. 960 24.00 23,040.00
15" RCI' STORM SEWER, INPLACE L.F. 1,810 22.00 39,820.00
12" RCP STORM SEWER, INPLACE L.F. 800 20.00 16,000.00
STANDARD MH 4' DIA. W /CASTING, INPLACE EACH 6 1200.00 7,200.00
STANDARD MH 6' DIA. W /CASTING, INPLACE EACH 15 1600.00 24,000.00
STANDARD CBMH W /CASTING EACH 24 900.00 21,600.00
STANDARD CB W /CASTING EACH 7 850.00 5,950.00
42" RCP FLARED END W /TRASH GUARD EACH 2 1600.00 3200.00
27" RCP FLARED END W /TRASH GUARD EACH 1 1000.00 1,000.00
24" RCP FLARED END W/TRASH GUARD EACH 1 800.00 800.00
15" RCP FLARED END W/TRASH GUARD EACH 3 500.00 1500.00
12" RCP FLARED END W /TRASH GUARD EACH 1 400.00 400.00
RIPRAP„ INPLACE C.Y. 55 50.00 2,750.00
CONNECT TO EXISTING MANHOLE EACH 2 400.00 800.00
ROCK STABILIZATION BELOW PIPE C.Y. 100 10.00 1,000.00
258,455.00
12,922.75
ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COST 271,377.75
+25% LEGAL, ENGINEERING, ADMIN. & BOND INTEREST 67,844.44
TOTAL ESTIMATED PRICE 339,222.19
TOTAL CONTRACT I: 1,158,838.72
A. CLIFF LAKE DRIVE
SUBTOTAL
+5% CONTINGENCIES
CONTRACT II
DESCRIPTION UNIT QTY. UNIT PRICE TOTAL
SUBGRADE PREPARATION R.S. 39.5 150.00 5,925.00
CLASS 5 AGGREGATE BASE TON 2,950 7.50 22,125.00
BITUMINOUS BASE COURSE TON 4,330 12.50 54,125.00
BITUMINOUS BINDER COURSE TON 2,690 13.50 36,315.00
BITUMINOUS WEAR COURSE TON 2,900 14.25 41,325.00
BITUMINOUS MATERIAL FOR MIXTURE TON 490 170.00 83,300.00
BITUMINOUS MATERIAL FOR TACK COAT GAL. 1,240 1.35 1,674.00
4" CONCRETE WALK W /GRANULAR BASE S.F. 29,100 2.30 66,930.00
4" CONCRETE MEDIAN S.Y. 520 24.00 12,480.00
B618 CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER L.F. 1,500 5.00 7,500.00
B624 CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER L.F. 14,370 6.70 96,279.00
CONDUIT SYSTEMS EACH 3 5000.00 15,000.00
SODDING S.Y. 7,750 2.50 19,375.00
ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COST
+25% LEGAL, ENGINEERING, ADMIN. & BOND INTEREST
TOTAL ESTIMATED PRICE 561,721.13
L!
427,978.00
21,398.90
449,376.90
112,344.23
B. CLIFF ROAD (CSAH 32)
SUBTOTAL
+5% CONTINGENCIES
C. TRAFFIC SIGNALS
CLIFF LAKE DRIVE
CLIFF ROAD
SUBTOTAL
5% CONTINGENCIES
DESCRIPTION
CURB REMOVAL
EXCAVATION
SUBGRADE PREPARATION
CLASS 5 AGGREGATE BASE
BITUMINOUS BASE COURSE
BITUMINOUS BINDER COURSE
BITUMINOUS WEAR COURSE
BITUMINOUS MATERIAL FOR MIXTURE
BITUMINOUS MATERIAL FOR TACK COAT
4" CONCRETE MEDIAN
B618 CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER
B624 CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER
SEEDING
ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COST
+25% LEGAL, ENGINEERING, ADMIN. & BOND INTEREST
TOTAL ESTIMATED PRICE
DESCRIPTION
ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COST
+25% LEGAL, ENGINEERING, ADMIN. & BOND INTEREST
UNIT QTY. UNIT PRICE TOTAL
L.F. 950 2.00 1,900.00
C.Y. 1,140 1.50 1,710.00
R.S. 20 150.00 3,000.00
TON 1,375 7.50 10,312.50
TON 335 12.50 4,187.50
TON 225 13.50 3,037.50
TON 225 14.25 3,206.25
TON 45 170.00 7,650.00
GAL. 150 1.35 202.50
S.Y. 200 24.00 4,800.00
L.F. 435 5.00 2,175.00
L.F. 580 6.70 3,886.00
ACRE 1.5 2,500.00 3,750.00
UNIT QTY. UNIT PRICE
L.S. L.S.
L.S. L.S.
\r)
80,000.00
80,000.00
42,457.25
2,122.86
44,580.11
11,145.03
55,725.14
TOTAL
80,000.00
80,000.00
160,000.00
8,000.00
168,000.00
42,000.00
TOTAL ESTIMATED PRICE 210,000.00
D. MEDIAN LANDSCAPING
DESCRIPTION UNIT QTY. UNIT PRICE TOTAL
BUDGET VALUE L.S. L.S. 46,000.00 46,000.00
SUBTOTAL 46,000.00
+5% CONTINGENCIES 2,300.00
ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COST 48,300.00
+25% LEGAL, ENGINEERING, ADMIN. & BOND INTEREST 12,075.00
TOTAL ESTIMATED PRICE 60,375.00
TOTAL CONTRACT II: 887,821.27
A. STREET LIGHTING
BUDGET VALUE
SUBTOTAL
+5% CONTINGENCIES
DESCRIPTION
CONTRACT III
ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COST
+25% LEGAL, ENGINEERING, ADMIN. & BOND INTEREST
UNIT QTY. UNIT PRICE TOTAL
L.S. L.S. 155,600.00 155,600.00
TOTAL ESTIMATED PRICE 204,225.00
155,600.00
7,780.00
163,380.00
40,845.00
APPENDIX B
PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL
CLIFF LAKE CENTRE
UTILITY AND STREET IMPROVEMENTS
PROJECT NO. 529
B - 1
A. SANITARY SEWER LATERAL
PARCEL ASSESSABLE ASSESSMENT TOTAL
DESCRIPTION AREA (ACRE) RATE /ACRE ASSESSMENT
CLIFF LAKE CENTRE PLAT:
LOT 1, BLOCK 1
LOT 2, BLOCK 1
LOT 3, BLOCK 1
OUTLOT A
OUTLOT B
OUTLOT C
OUTLOT D
OUTLOT E
TOTALS:
7.50 2,667.40 20,005.50
10.49 2,667.40 27,981.03
10.50 2,667.40 28,007.70
1.21 2,667.40 3,227.55
3.77 2,667.40 10,056.10
0.00 2,667.40 0.00
0.00 2,667.40 0.00
17.65 1,689.22 29,814.73
51.12 119,092.61
B. WATERMAIN LATERAL
PARCEL ASSESSABLE ASSESSABLE ASSESSMENT TOTAL
DESCRIPTION FRONTAGE AREA (ACRE) RATE ASSESSMENT
CLIFF LAKE CENTRE PLAT:
LOT 1, BLOCK 1
LOT 2, BLOCK 1
LOT 3, BLOCK 1
OUTLOT A
OUTLOT B
OUTLOT C
OUTLOT D
OUTLOT E
S.E. 1/4, SECTION 30:
PARCEL 011 -76
TOTAL:
7.50 5,016.94 37,627.05
10.49 5,016.94 52,627.70
10.50 5,016.94 52,677.87
1.21 5,016.94 6,070.50
3.77 5,016.94 18,913.86
11.59 5,016.94 58,146.33
9.30 5,016.94 46,657.54
14.12 5,016.94 70,839.19
640 21.60 13,824.00
68.48 357,384.05
C.1. STORM SEWER LATERAL
PARCEL PARCEL SIZE (1) ASSESSABLE ASSESSMENT TOTAL
DESCRIPTION (ACRES) AREA (ACRE) RATE /ACRE ASSESSMENT
CLIFF LAKE CENTRE PLAT:
LOT 1, BLOCK 1
LOT 2, BLOCK 1
LOT 3, BLOCK 1
OUTLOT A
OUTLOT B
OUTLOT C
OUTLOT D
OUTLOT E
TOTAL: 73.39 46.16 372,739.83
C.2. STORM SEWER TRUNK
PARCEL PARCEL SIZE (1) ASSESSABLE ASSESSMENT TOTAL
DESCRIPTION (ACRES) AREA (ACRE) RATE /ACRE ASSESSMENT
CLIFF LAKE CENTRE PLAT:
LOT 1, BLOCK 1
LOT 2, BLOCK 1
LOT 3, BLOCK 1
OUTLOT A
OUTLOT B
OUTLOT C
OUTLOT D
OUTLOT E
TOTAL:
(1) EXCLUDING PONDING AREAS
(2) 8C% OF DRAINAGE AREA
7.50 7.50 8,208.32 61,562.40
10.49 9.99 8,208.32 82,001.12
11.88 9.54 8,208.32 78,307.37
1.21 1.21 8,208.32 9,932.07
3.77 0.00 6,840.27 0.00
11.59 3.73 6,840.27 25,514.21
9.30 0.77 6,840.27 5,267.01
17.65 13.42 (2) 8,208.32 110,155.65
7.50 7.50 3,615.48 27,116.10
10.49 10.49 3,615.48 37,926.39
11.88 11.88 3,615.48 42,951.90
1.21 1.21 3,615.48 4,374.73
3.77 3.77 3,049.20 11,495.48
11.59 11.59 3,049.20 35,340.23
9.30 9.30 3,049.20 28,357.56
17.65 17.65 3,615.48 63,813.22
73.39 73.39 251,375.61
•
D. STREET (INTERNAL)
PARCEL ASSESSABLE ASSESSABLE ASSESSMENT TOTAL
DESCRIPTION FRONTAGE AREA RATE ASSESSMENT
CLIFF LAKE CENTRE PLAT:
LOT 1, BLOCK 1 7.50 12,910.41 96,828.08
LOT 2, BLOCK 1 10.49 12,910.41 135,430.20
LOT 3, BLOCK 1 10.50 12,910.41 135,559.31
OUTLOT A 1.21 12,910.41 15,621.60
OUTLOT B 555 0.00 90.20 50,061.00
OUTLOT C 1,140 0.00 90.20 102,828.00
OUTLOT D 1,460 0.00 90.20 131,692.00
OUTLOT E 17.65 12,910.41 227,868.74
TOTAL: 3,155 47.35 895,888.91
E. SIDEWALKS
PARCEL ASSESSABLE ASSESSMENT TOTAL
DESCRIPTION FRONTAGE RATE /F.F. ASSESSMENT
CLIFF LAKE CENTRE PLAT:
LOT 1, BLOCK 1 1,024 12.80 13,107.20
LOT 2, BLOCK 1 471 12.80 6,028.80
LOT 3, BLOCK 1 807 12.80 10,329.60
OUTLOT A 407 12.80 5,209.60
OUTLOT B 555 12.80 7,104.00
OUTLOT C 1,140 12.80 14,592.00
OUTLOT D 1,460 12.80 18,688.00
OUTLOT E 1,002 12.80 12,825.60
TOTAL:
6,866 87,884.80
F. CLIFF LAKE DRIVE TRAFFIC SIGNALS
PARCEL ASSESSABLE ASSESSMENT TOTAL
DESCRIPTION AREA (ACRE) RATE /ACRE ASSESSMENT
CLIFF LAKE CENTRE PLAT:
LOT 1, BLOCK 1 7.50 2,500.00 18,750.00
LOT 2, BLOCK 1 10.49 2,500.00 26,225.00
LOT 3, BLOCK 1 10.50 5,428.57 56,999.99
OUTLOT A 1.21 2,500.00 3,025.00
OUTLOT B 0 3,378.38 0.00
OUTLOT C 0 3,378.38 0.00
OUTLOT 0 0 3,378.38 0.00
OUTLOT E 0 3,378.38 0.00
TOTAL:
29.70 104,999.99
O
V
C0
3
0)
4
4
a
N
U
4
a
a
4
0
F
z
cc
1 .
F
N
a
4
m
F
4
a
F
4
.4
a
m v v In v to
m
e4 n 0 .41. n
.0 0 m .4 0 0
O. N m .O m N
O N O) V' .0
a. m ' . n N •0
n O O or O. m
N m v N
O O rn O O O O O O 0
O O O. O O O O O O 0
O in 0. ul O 0 0 O O 0
0) N 01 N
n N O. O
CO .n .o m
N N 1(1
O O O O O O O O O 0
N 0) .O •O O O O .0 O O
n W O. co a N m u1 O 0
0 N N 0 0 Co on N
.4 0 m N .+ ul .O O)
m .O O u1 n d• O
N r1 .1 N .i
03 O .. O O O O V• 0 0
0 N m .O O O O n 0 0
d) 0 04 .-1 .1 Q) N 10 0 0
N m ul N •O N 0. .0
O v in '0 0 0) .O m
b u'1 In in O N .-1 n
O. m m .4 in O m N
O O. O m m
m m rn n •+•
•0 .O of V 141
H N 1n n O.
.1 P P m
n n N v •1
N m .1
0 N n n 0 .i .+
o r of on 0 0 N 0
•
n N 0 V n
.o O O m .4 .0
in O m 0. 01 N
N N CO P 0) u1
O
00 n N
O .O «5 • O. O
in CO m in .4 O
O m •O O. P 0
n of 'r in m
0 a .4 03 ao
.0 a0 a0 .O O
.+ u1 v n
in 0 of 0 0 0 m 0 0
O n u1 .-1 O O n O O
.+ Co n 0 0 V 0 0
CO O N
O. O 00 O C O
r CO m o rn
N N .4 N
0 O O
0 O O
0 O v
N
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
w
O1
0.
O.
0.
0.
V
0
O)
m
.4
4
O
F
67
f '"P.WII --f
. 12. SALEM "►T.
root n, .u. AM
TWA ARK
(MAY n n. SORPtc ri .
t AT'( PT r7 NIJ■Ta IT
�JG(AELL T n ' a. Er� • P7
p(HAO TT I 9 NOw1 EN R n
Y PT � STAVT�Ey
NNUSY PT, 1 ' All► ��
sr
ENGINEERS I ARCHITECTS ! PLANNERS
V
U
Agenda Information Memo
April 19, 1988, City Council Meeting
PROJECT 530, KINDER CARE ADDITION
C. Project 530, Kinder Care Addition (Water Main) - -On March 1,
the Council received a feasibility report and scheduled a public
hearing for April 19 to discuss the installation of a water main
lateral along the east side f Krestwood Lan from Crestridge
Drive. Enclosed on ( 1,,q) through 3 is a copy of
the feasibility repo tf or the Council's information and review
during the formal presentation by the City's consulting engineer.
All notices have been published in the legal newspaper and sent
to all potentially affected property owners informing them of
this public hearing.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To close the public
hearing and approve /modify /deny Project 530 (Kinder Care Addition
- Water Main) and, if approved, authorize the preparation of
detailed plans and specifications and acquisition of easements
through condemnation, if necessary.
( .9s
Report For
Kinder Care Addition
Water Main Improvements
Eagan, Minnesota
City Project No. 530
February, 1988
File No, 49454
Bones troo
Rosene
Anderlik &
Associates
Englneen & Architects
St. Paul, Minnesota
Bonestroo
Rosene
Anderiik &
Associates
Engineers & Architects
February 24, 1988
Honorable Mayor and Council
City of Eagan
3830 Pilot Knob Road
Eagan, MN 55122
Re: Kinder Care Addition
Water Main Improvements
Project No. 530
File No. 49454
Dear Mayor and Council:
Transmitted herewith is our report for Kinder Care Addition, Project No. 530.
This report covers water main construction and includes a preliminary assess-
ment roll.
We would be pleased to meet with the Council and other interested parties at a
mutually convenient time to discuss any aspect of this report.
Yours very truly,
BONESTROO „ ROSEN , ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES, INC.
Mark - A. Hanson
MAH:li
Approved by
RPT49454
Date:
3- /-c--KC-1-
Otto G. Bonestroo, P.E.
Robert W Rosene, PE
Joseph C Anderlik, PE.
Bradford A Lemberg, PE
Richard E. Turner, PE
James C Olson, PE
Glenn R. Cook, P.E.
Thomas E. Noyes, PE.
Robert G Schunicht, PE.
Marvin L. Sorvala, PE.
epartment of Public Works
I hereby certify that this report was prepared
by me or under my direct supervision and that
I am a duly Registered Professional Engineer
Minnesota.
under the laws
Date: February 24, 1988 Reg. No. 14260
2335 West Highway 36 • St. Paul, Minnesota 55113 • 612 - 636 -4600
u(p
Keith A. Gordon, P.E.
Richard W Foster, PE.
Donald C. Burgardt, PE.
Jerry A. Bourdon, P.E.
Mark A Hanson, PE
Ted K. Field, P.E.
Michael T. Rautmann, PE.
Robert R. Pfefferle, P.E.
David O. Loskota, P.E.
Thomas W Peterson, PE
Michael C Lynch, P.E.
James R. Maland, PE.
Kenneth P. Anderson, PE.
Keith A. Bachmann, PE
Mark R Rolfs, P.E.
Robert C. Russek, A.I.A
Thomas E Angus, P.E.
Howard A. Sanford, P.E.
Mark A lHanson
Charles A Erickson
Leo M. Pawelsky
Harlan M. Olson
Susan M. Eberly')
Mark A. Sep
SCOPE: This project provides for the construction of water main to serve
Kinder Care Addition. Kinder Care Addition is located on the east side of
Krestwood Lane between Duckwood Drive and Crestridge Lane and includes one lot.
FEASIBILITY AND RECOMMENDATIONS: The project is feasible from an engineering
standpoint and is in accordance with the Comprehensive Water Plan. The proj-
ect as outlined herein can best be carried out by combining it with Duckwood
Drive, Project No. 514.
DISCUSSION:
Water Main - Water main proposed herein includes constructing a 6" main in
Krestwood Lane as shown on the attached drawing. The 6" main will connect to
an existing 6" hydrant lead in Crestridge Lane eliminating the need to open
cut the street surface. An 8" main exists in Crestridge Lane. Kinder Care
Addition is located in the intermediate pressure zone and will experience
residual and static pressures of 72 and 56 psi respectively.
Services - It is proposed to construct a 1" diameter water service to serve
Kinder Care Addition.
EASEMENTS: The construction of the 6" main in Krestwood Lane northerly from
Crestridge Lane will require an easement along the westerly side of Lot 1
Pilot Knob Heights First. Presently gas mains and a regulating station exist
in the boulevard of Krestwood Lane. Therefore, a 10 foot wide easement is re-
quired.
Parcel Permanent Temporary
Description Easement Easement
PILOT KNOB HEIGHTS FIRST
Lot 1 0.08 ac. 0.08 ac.
R49454
Page 1.
AREA TO BE INCLUDED:
KINDER CARE ADDITION
Lot 1, Block 1
PILOT KNOB HEIGHTS FIRST
Lot 1
COST ESTIMATE: A detailed cost estimate is presented in Appendix A located at
the back of this report. A summary of these costs is as follows:
R49454
Water Main
Service
TOTAL
Page 2.
4g
$18,030
470
$18,500
The total estimated project cost is $18,500 which includes contingencies
and all related overhead. Overhead costs are estimated at 30% and include
legal, engineering, administration and bond interest.
ASSESSMENTS; Assessments are proposed to be levied against the benefited
property. A preliminary assessment roll is included at the back of this re-
port in Appendix B. These assessments will be spread over 10 years at an in-
terest rate based on the bond sale financing this project.
WATER MAIN: Water main proposed herein is lateral. Therefore, it is proposed
to assess the entire cost of the water main to the benefiting property it
serves as shown on the attached drawing. A 150' corner lot credit was given
for the front footage along Krestwood Lane for Lot 1, Pilot Knob Heights First.
SERVICE: The water service to Kinder Care Addition is proposed to be assessed
to Lot 1, Block 1.
REVENUE: Revenue sources to cover the cost of this project are as follows:
WATER
Lateral
Lateral Assessment
SERVICE
Lateral
Lateral Assessment
R49454
Project
Cost Revenue Balance
$18,030
$18,030
$ 470
$ 470
Present Feasibility Report
Public Hearing
Approve Plans & Specifications
Open Bids /Award Contract
Construction Completion
Final Assessment Hearing
First Payment Due with Real Estate Taxes
PROJECT SCHEDULE
Page 3.
$18,030
$18,030 - 0 -
$ 470
$ 470 - 0 -
March 15, 1988
April 19, 1988
May, 1988
June, 1988
July, 1988
September, 1988
May, 1989
A.) WATER MAIN
430 Lin.ft. 6" DIP water main in pl. @ $16.00 / 1in.ft. $ 6,880
2 Each 6" Resilient wedge gate valve & box @ $400.00 /each 800
1 Each Hydrant in pl. @ $1,000.00 /each 1,000
700 Lbs. Fittings in pl. @ $1.50 /lb. 1,050
1 Each Connect 6" D.I.P. to existing main @ $600.00 /each 600
430 Lin.ft. Mechanical trench compaction @ $1.00 / lin.ft. 430
LUMP SUM Street repair @ $2,000.00 /L.S. 2,000
0.3 Acre Seed with mulch @ $1,500.00 /acre 450
Total $13,210
+5% Contingencies 660
$13,870
+30Z Legal, Engrng., Admin. & Bond Interest 4,160
TOTAL WATER MAIN $18,030
B. SERVICES
30 Lin.ft. 1" Type K copper in pl. @ $6.00 / lin.ft. $ 180
1 Each 1" Corporation stop @ $50.00 /each 50
1 Each 1" Curb stop and box @ $80.00 /each 80
30 Lin.ft. Mechanical trench compaction @ $1.00 / 1in.ft. 30
Total $ 340
+5% Contingencies 20
$ 360
+30Z Legal, Engrng., Admin. & Bond Interest 110
TOTAL SERVICES $ 470
R49454
APPENDIX A
PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE
KINDER CARE ADDITION
WATER MAIN IMPROVEMENTS
PROJECT NO. 530
Page 4.
A. WATER MAIN
Parcel Assessable
Description Footage
KINDER CARE ADDITION
Lot 1, Block 1 141 $56.69 $ 7,995
PILOT KNOB HEIGHTS FIRST
Lot 1, Block 1 177 (
318
( Includes 150' corner lot credit.
B. SERVICES
KINDER CARE ADDITION
R49454
APPENDIX B
PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL
KINDER CARE ADDITION
WATER MAIN IMPROVEMENTS
PROJECT NO. 530
Page 5.
Rate /F.F.
Parcel Total
Description Assessment
Lot 1, Block 1 $470
Total
Assessment
$56.69 $10,035
$18,030
Parcel Water
Description Main
KINDER CARE ADDITION
Lot 1, Block 1 $ 7,995
PILOT KNOB HEIGHTS FIRST
Lot 1, Block 1
R49454
SUMMARY
PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL
KINDER CARE ADDITION
PROJECT NO. 530
$10,035 $10,035
Page 6.
(1 a
Services
Total
Assessment
$ 470 $ 8,465
$18,500
1
0
CO
0
0
0
FIRST
MINNEHAHA
ADDITION
PROPOSED 6" D1
WATER MAIN
FIRST
MINNEHAHA
ADDITION
0
CC
H
w
EXISTING
GAS REGULATING
STATION
r
L
KINDER CARE ADDITION
WATER MAIN IMPROVEMENTS
CITY PROJECT NO. 530
EAGAN, MINNESOTA
0v C
EAGAN
CONVENIENCE
pITER
ASSESSABLE FOOTAGE
LOT I 4 G .
O O
150' CORNER LOT CREDIT
10' EASEMENT
CREST RIDGE
1 LANE
EX. 8. CIP
'Dote: JAN. 1988
Comm. 49454
0
Scale
PROPOSED
KINDER CARE
ADDITION
Sanest roo
Rosette
And rNk i
Associates
engM..t• a Architects
14. Pat Mtm+.e.t.
Agenda Information Memo
April 19, 1988, City Council Meeting
OLD: BUSINESS
AGREEMENT /JOINT FIELD USE
A. Agreement for Joint Field Use, City of Eagan /ISD #196- -The
City and Independent School District #196 have successfully
negotiated a joint field use agreement for softball diamonds,
tennis courts and other public facilities that will be scheduled
and used by both entities adjacent to the new Eagan High School.
For a copy of the agreement and other pertinent information,
refer to page or pages * through *
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the
joint field use agreement between the City of Eagan and ISD #196.
*The field use agreement was not available for inclusion in
this packet. It will be available for distribution in the
Additional Information packet on Monday.
r-tA
Agenda Information Memo
April 19, 1988, City Council Meeting
NEW BUSINESS
APPOINTMENT /COUNTY RECYCLING SUBCOMMITTEE
A. Appointment to County Recycling Subcommittee -- Recently,
action was taken by the City Council to appoint Thom Yehle to the
Routed and Organized Collection Subcommittee of the Dakota County
Solid Waste Management Advisory Committee as Eagan's
representative. More recently the City has received a letter
requesting the appointment of a representative to the recycling
subcommittee. The recycling subcommittee will work with County
staff in the preparation of the recycling implementation strategy
and the implementation of future recycling programs. This group
will play an important role in determining how Dakota County will
achieve its solid waste reduction /recycling goals in the years
ahead. The Solid Waste Abatement Commission is recommending that
Brenda Marshall be the City's representative on this County
subcommittee.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To appoint an Eagan
resident as a member of the recycling subcommittee, a
subcommittee of the Dakota County Solid Waste Management Advisory
Committee.
GAMBLING LICENSE /PULL -TABS AT RICHARD'S
B. Gambling License for Pull -Tabs at Richard's Food and Liquor,
Knights of Columbus /St. John Neumann Church - -A gambling license
application was received from the St. John Neumann Knights of
Columbus requesting a pull -tab at Richard's Food and Liquor. The
gambling license application is in compliance with City Code
requirements. For a copy of the license application, refer to
pages '7(o through -) R .
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the
gambling license application for a class B pull -tabs at Richard's
Food and Liquor as requested by the St. John Neumann Knights of
Columbus.
* The Knights of Columbus are requesting that this item be
continued to the May 3, 1988 City Council meeting.
15. Number of active members
��7
16.
Number of years in existence
(� '
Note: If less than four years, attach
evidence of three years
existence.
17. Name of Chief Executive Officer
/ of
i, /t/J,( ./:: �� I
18. Name of treasurer or person who accounts for other revenues
the organization.
A) 7 /4;4,�Y -,4 f r 2' ,
Title
Title
Business Phone Number r/
• Business Phone Number / {
19. Name of establishment where gambling will be
Al, conducted ' /, /•,/, /(' / -ice /,) J' ///1- 3 ir/�'_-
20. Street address (not P.O. Box Number)
�,,,� r
di //,4, ', G •' �<st /'/ /A / /•.
21. City, State, Zip `` f / ,,'/ d.. -' ✓ ���-,'�
.--,----
s ...� c' �' rlt
22. County (where gambling premises is located)
ii 7,
INSTRUCTIONS:
A. Type or print in ink.
B. Take completed application to local governing body, obtain signature and date on all copies, and leave 1 copy. Applicant keeps 1
copy ,and sends original to the above address with a check.
C. Incomplete applications will be returned.
Type of Application:
❑Class A — Fee $ 100.00 (Bingo, Raffles, Paddlewheels, Tipboards, Pull -tabs)
JJClass B — Fee $ 50.00 (Raffles, Paddlewheels, Tipboards, Pull -tabs)
❑Class C — Fee $ 50.00 (Bingo only)
❑Class D — Fee $ 25.00 (Raffles only)
❑Yes ONo 3. Have Internal Controls been submitted previously? If no, please attach copy.
4. Applicant (Official, legal name of organization)
/ t
SI • 1 %`i ' / ✓E ii,'�.I.t r /e:f� %1 •�� i' i✓ b�0 '.i�/
6. City, State, Zip 7. County
l - //MA '.`,U, / //i!/. .3 3/,
CG- 0001 -02 (8/861
Charitable Gambling Control Board
Room N -475 Griggs- Midway Building
1821 University Avenue
St. Paul, Minnesota 55104 -3383
(612) 642 -0555
GAMBLING LICENSE APPLICATION
White Copy -Board
r
FOR BOARD USE ONLY
License Number
PAID
AMT
CHECK#
DATE
Canary- Applicant
I Make checks payable to:
Minnesota Charitable Gambling Control Board
❑Yes ONo 1. Is this application for a renewal? If yes, give complete license number
❑Yes IJNtt 2. If this is not an application for a renewal, has organization been licensed by the Board before? If yes, give base
license number (middle five digits) 1
5. Business Address of Organization
8. Business Phone Number
( /.L ) ;6:2•, - ' 7j • i
9, Type of organization: Xraternal ❑Veterans ❑Religious ❑Other nonprofit•
• If organization is an "other nonprofit" organization, answer questions 10 through 13. If not, go to question 14. "Other nonprofit" organizations
must document its tax - exempt status.
❑Yes ❑No 10. Is organization incorporated as a nonprofit organization? If yes, give number assigned to Articles or page and
book number 1 1 Attach copy of certificate.
❑Yes ❑No 11. Are articles filed with the Secretary of State?
❑Yes ❑No 12. Are articles filed with the County?
)Yes ❑No 13. Is organization exempt from Minnesota or Federal income tax? If yes, please attach letter from IRS or Department of
Revenue declaring exemption or copy of 990 or 990T.
❑Yes No 14. Has license ever been denied, suspended or revoked? If yes, check all that apply:
❑Denied ❑Suspended ❑Revoked Give date. 1 - - 1
Pink -Local Governing Body
30. Insurance Company Name
.. - /:1 rG j2:, Y (' ‘;,y1 „.ve,y
31. Bond Number
/ err > 6.'_ K1'/
32. Lessor Name
33. Address
34. City, State,Zip
35. mbling Manager Name
0/t/110 31 i _ /r
36. Address �7 ^j
94 �/ ,J / • /. .
/
37. / City / , State, Zip
fi` / ,c/tid ,...v.../.- _ �/ �jr? .
38. Gambling Manager Business Phone
( a2- ) /37- .jJ
39. Date
member
gambling manager became
of organization: /v /.) ",6
)
42. Name of City or County (Local Governing Body)
C. pr- r .-7A &-I At
If site is located within a township, item 43 must be completed, in
addition to the county signature.
..,
Signature of person receiving application
43. Name of Township .
•
Title C•Y
�1 S - �
Date received (30 day period
begins f --/ thi ( •
Signature of person receiving application
x
44. Name 9f Person delivering application to Local Governing Body
. r.),v4 // ,l - ,I,-- 1-c .
Title
f
°'.'M°"°M ~7einnivKrsIorwrci s• ..,. -
ambling License Application
Type of Application: ❑Class A *lass B • - 0 Class C ❑Class D
❑Yes 2 o 28. Do you plan on conducting bingo with this license? If yes, give days and times of bingo occasions:
Days Times
es ❑ No 29. Has the $ 10,000 fidelity bond required by Minnesota Statutes 349.20 been obtained? Attach copy of bond.
Page 2
es DNo 23. Is gambling premises located within city limits?
dlYes ❑No 24. Are all gambling activities conducted at the premises listed in #19 of this application? If not, complete a separate
application for each premises (except raffles) as a separate license is required for each premises.
❑Yes Cf110 25. Does organization own the gambling premises? If no, attach copy of the lease with terms of at least one year.
0Yes1No 26. Does the organization lease the entire premises? If no, attach a sketch of 27. Amount of Monthly Rent
the premises indicating what portion is being leased. A lease and sketch
is not required for Class D applications.
$
GAMBLING SITE AUTHORIZATION
By my signature below, local law enforcement officers or agents of the Board are hereby authorized to enter upon the site,
at any time, gambling is being conducted, to observe the gambling and to enforce the law for any unauthorized game or
practice.
BANK RECORDS AUTHORIZATION 0
By my signature below, the Board is hereby authorized to inspect the bank records of the General Gambling Bank Account
whenever necessary to fulfill requirements of current gambling rules and law.
OATH
. 1 hereby declare that:
1. I have read this application and all information submitted to the Board;
2. All information submitted is true, accurate and complete;
3. All other required information has been fully disclosed
4: -. I am the chief executive officer of the organization; -
5. I assume full responsibility for the fair and lawful operation of all activities to be conducted;
6. I will familiarize myself with the laws of the State of Minnesota respecting gambling and rules of the Board and agree,
if licensed, to abide by those laws and rules, inludinq amendments thereto.
1 7 C �t �� �1 v. o
40. Of tic' I, L al Na of OrOization :� I v J
41. S;gr ture ( ust be� by ief Executive Officer)
44 r r 4- 6 � 1 3
L.); .F t�i4.. F., x / (l.. dl.t(/ ✓
r
Title of Si r Date J O
t ri
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF NOTICE BY LOCAL GOVERNING BODY
I hereby acknowledg ceipt of a copy of this application. By acknowledging receipt,.1 admit been served with
notice that this licati n will be reviewed by the Charitable Gambling Control Board and if approved by the board, 'will
become effecti a 36 da from the date of receipt (noted below), unless a resolution of the local governing body is passed
which speeifica dis ows such activity and a copy of that resolution is received by the Charitable Gambling Control
Board w ithin 30 d of the below noted date.
CG- 0001 -02 18186)
White Copy -Board
fi
Canary - Applicant
C h
Pink -Local Governing Body
GI's 1
s r .i Gfig✓ i f/�- v��r.4.v.� /6 _ i_) cyr v. "di -j
r
l\ .6,f/�: , J L L % l FROM �!'7 /,�y TO 11 //f r
(Lessor) (Lessee) Term o1 Agreement
This agreement made this ( day of ` 7214 - 19�.L, by and between
,! / / i %1 iJ / ',.: 1 ) 7 J / 0.` `'. party of the first part, Lessor, and
S 7 it vt . /1Z2--‘,41j)--A./A-/ Xr/li'/2', J' fJ t' i'1 vii, cr f party of the second part, lessee.
f7X/ MM
WITNESSETH, that the said party of the first part, In Consideration of the rents and convenants herein after mentioned,
does hereby hire and take from said party of the first part the following described premises, situated In the
County of 1)/ 7/ , Stale of Minnesota
Tho 1 -"//i A-7
. i, / >�'. // /7t, . /1'/
l
Lessor /Grant 31
13y AR;;;//
Its
portion of the premises u described on attached site plan located at
that shall be used for
(CHECK ONE Oil DOI.II
0 BINGO in GAMBLING DEVICES (Tlpboards, Pulltabs, Paddlewheels and Raffles) During the hours
of m /pm to Am /pm
The parties: mutually agree to the following covenants:
The lessee shall pay 6 PV: ,a tent plus ' "` /7 '%f•'rf* r ut 1 ties for each -- session /occasion on the
following days 54IN;',07 %�t��' \• between the following hours "f • a m /p m to �__' m /p m
/The lessee( shall comply with all laws concerning the operation of gambling as written or amended by either the State
of Minnesota or the Charitable Gambling Control Board.
The tease shall run fora period of ono year. however. either party may Inform the other of its cancellation upon
thirty (0) days written notice to the other. Leases tenegotlated at times other than license renewal time will be
furnished to the Charitable Gambling Control Board ton (10) days prior to effective date of the lease.
Reasonable care shall be exercised by the lessee for care of the furnishings used during lessee's period of rental.
L
Date: this day of . /e) / z. 19 � D
in the county of ) > ` � / • Minnesota
,- �, , / rj v et
Si ig /�N /r''=' V�
Lessee �-
By
Its > 4 / /t/e. /IA h fi��'
ATTAQit•¢NIS: Site Floor Plan' and description of genera; area. (L7G, HPLS)
4 Location Where Charitable Gambling
Will Be Conducted.
Site Address _ / /i /-
Agenda Information Memo
April 19, 1988, City Council Meeting
WAIVER OF PLAT /KENNETH WASON /UNIVERSAL BUILDERS
C. Waiver of Plat for Kenneth Wason, Universal Builders for Lot
3, Block 2, Oakwood Heights Addition for a Duplex Lot Split - -An
application was received from Mr. Kenneth Wason /Universal
Builders to consider a waiver of plat on Lot 3, Block 2, Oakwood
Heights Addition for a duplex lot split to allow individual
ownership.
For additional information on this item, refer to the Planning
Department report, a copy is enclosed on page(s) 7 )1 �4a..
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the
waiver of plat for Kenneth Wason /Universal Builders to split Lot
3, Block 2, Oakwood Heights Addition to allow individual
ownership.
0
SUBJECT: WAIVER OF PLAT
APPLICANT: KENNETH WASON - UNIVERSAL BUILDERS
LOCATION: LOT 3, BLOCK 2, OAKWOOD HEIGHTS 2ND ADDITION
EXISTING ZONING: PD R -2 (PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DUPLEX)
DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: APRIL 19, 1988
DATE OF REPORT: APRIL 11, 1988
REPORTED BY: PLANNING DEPARTMENT
APPLICATION: An application has been submitted by Kenneth Wason
requesting a Waiver of Plat in order to split Lot 3, Block 2,
Oakwood Heights Addition. The duplex lot split would allow
individual ownership. This duplex has separate utilities and
meets all setback requirements.
If approved, this Waiver of Plat shall be subject to all
applicable Code requirements.
•
•
•
•
2 ,
•
f1
CITY OF EAGAN
s
N E1 G N
Y,w •i. r.. v.0
JS . pp . :'
• •
•
14
.•, .- T' 1 RN
� .. � ru .r L, t� f
ROBE
t ENGINEERING
COMNnNY, INC.
EAST 146 tt1 STREET, E::RR!i- °JILL£ . LIINHESOTP
COU
/qc5. - 4'
L 95
pR 1vE
_ /3
2 ort:
C2HSJlT1Nd EH3IHEEUS
PLANNERS and LARD SURV
5337 PH 43 2
Cer�z z cLZ3e ry
LOT 3, BLOCK Z, OAK:WOOD HE/SA/TS ZVD
ADDIT/DN, DAKOTA CDUit17Y , /V1 i1VA/ESCTA
3.
` el' pu
4. °,
11
°
o
68.
\1/4
•
'V A
( 3%
11.
.v 2 ° ' " -
1 *•
OZ.
1,.
C2 1 ' ( �
1e?_ _„.---' '
s
s
Y = "
5 5 1."
g uid
30' PROA T .0 /LOIN
SETBACK LJIJE
(,d7, gNES
t,�
i' W / LD
I hereby c:erlify that this is a and correct representation of a tract of
land a: shown' and described hereon.. Aa prepared by me on this sd 'day of
MAY , 19 g J •
cx:). 76, Y4E6 3
VAI VEZ A2. BvILP6RS
RR°JECT Alo. 226.01
DENOTES EXIST! N C - .
ELIrVATt
DENOTES PROFOSE.
1r LEVA TIONV
/ND /CRIES
OF SURFACE DRAINAGE
= F/N I SHED GARAGE
FLOOR ELEVATI01■1
5CACE . /" _ 30'
A Hann. Reg. Ho. /6405--
Agenda Information Memo
April 19, 1988, City Council Meeting
SPECIAL PERMIT /STASSENS FOR TEMPORARY MOBILE HOME
D. Special Permit for William and JoAnne Stassen for a Temporary
Mobile Home at 670 Lone Oak Road -- William and JoAnne Stassen are
requesting a special permit for a temporary mobile home at 670
Lone Oak Road. Actually, the request is to park a fifth wheel
trailer adjacent to their home at the same address.
Mr. and Mrs. Stassen have been granted and denied this special
permit request in the past and for that information and a parcel
description, refer to the Planning Department report, a copy is
enclosed on pages cs 4 through o
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To aprove or deny a
special permit requested by William and JoAnne Stassen for a
temporary mobile home at 670 Lone Oak Road.
B3
CONDITIONS:
SUBJECT: SPECIAL PERMIT
APPLICANT: WILLIAM H. STASSEN
LOCATION: 670 LONE OAK ROAD
EXISTING ZONING: AGRICULTURAL
DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: APRIL 19, 1988
DATE OF REPORT: APRIL 12, 1988
a
1988 STREET MAP
REPORTED BY: PLANNING DIVISION
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
APPLICATION: An application has been submitted requesting a spe-
cial permit to allow temporary parking for residency of a 5th
wheel travel trailer located at 670 Lone Oak Road from April 20,
1988 to October 31, 1988.
COMMENTS: The applicant has applied for this permit twice prior
to this application. Approval was given in 1986; the 1987
renewal was denied by the Council at the August 4, 1987 meeting.
During both years the 8' x 36' fifth wheel trailer was located on
the site. The approximately 11 acre site is owned by Joseph
Steininger who has his permanent residence there. The trailer
would be located 400 feet from the Steininger's house and ap-
proximately the same distance from the nearest neighbor. The
trailer site has been improved to the extent that utilities have
been installed.
If approved, this temporary special permit shall be from April
20, 1988 thru October 31, 1988 only.
LOCATION . � . ��
`,+iv\ . " f 4
ZONING
EC.12,T27, R23
.1 �
». N
r• T L .» a0
rr0
i floo - obo- 1
rao
rare
020 - 2S
•I.• 1•111
030-25
g STATE
4 41
+
1= 1
•
t
Sr r%
HIGHWAY - -•"-% NO.
r r te r
ac o: aca. 111
s o• u• ir l roe so
I
SITE
Sr
040-25
xD 26
101
r
I . 1)C
. - .r1• mi.�.*ar au••r1
03$O0-
Olo -10
BERNARD H. LARSON
COUNTY SURV EYOR
DAKOTA COUNTY, IN N.
AUGUST, 1978
*1111(0
*f Y1YD •-M -Y
03800- Oto-Ot
0
03600 - 010 -01.
ro
7
P4
i
0
0
TRAILER
S G
Agenda Information Memo
April 19, 1988, City Council Meeting
VARIANCE /JOHN YOUNG /CURB AND GUTTER AND PAVING REOUIREMENTS
E. Variance, John J. Young, Lot 3, Block 2, Halley's 1st
Addition, from Curb and Gutter and Paving Requirements and from
100 Rear Yard Setback from A, R or R District - -A variance
application was submitted by John J. Young for Lot 3, Block 2
Halley's 1st Addition, requesting a change from the curb and
gutter and paving requirements and from the 100' setback from the
A, P, or R District in the rear yard.
For additional information on this item, refer to tilp Planning
Department report, a copy is enclosed on pages gx. through
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the
variance for John J. Young to allow a variance from the curb and
gutter and paving requirements and the 100' rear yard setback
requirement as described.
SUBJECT: VARIANCE
APPLICANT: JOHN J. YOUNG
LOCATION: LOT 3, BLOCK 2, HALLEY'S FIRST ADDITION
EXISTING ZONING: LI (LIMITED INDUSTRIAL)
DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: APRIL 19, 1988
DATE OF REPORT: APRIL 12, 1988
REPORTED BY: PLANNING DIVISION
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
SITE LOCATION: Halley's First Addition was approved by the coun-
cil May 2, 1972 and is zoned Limited Industrial. It is located
north of Gun Club Road along Biscayne Avenue, which is a gravel
road. The Land Use Guide Plan (January 1987) designates this
site as single - family (0 -3 units /acre). The area surrounding
Halley's is zoned Agricultural with the exception of a park to
the south; the area east of Highway 3 south of Cliff Road to the
city's limits is designated single- family by the City's Land
Use Guide Plan. Although platted, there have been no improvements
made in this area.
APPLICATION: An application was submitted by the applicant
requesting a variance from the 100' minimum setback from an "A"
zoning district, and a variance from curb, gutter, and paving
requirements.
COMMENTS: The applicant is proposing to construct a 48'x 176'
pole barn on Lot 3, Block 2, Halley's First Addition. The build-
ing will be used as leased storage space for a single tenant. The
structure meets all setback requirements except the 100' rear
yard setback which is required when an industrial site abuts an
agricultural, residential, or public zoning district. The site
plan shows the pole barn being setback only 30.22'.
The applicant is also requesting exemption from the curb, gutter
and paving requirements for these reasons:
* The final grade on the street could be changed when the
street is paved.
* When utilities are put in, any existing curb , gutter and
paving would need to be redone.
* Difficulty in maintaining the asphalt where it meets the
gravel.
If approved, the variance shall be subject to the following
conditions:
1) No outside storage shall be allowed.
2) A detailed landscape plan shall be submitted; a landscape bond
shall be required and not released until one year after the
landscaping has been completed.
ENGINEERING COMMENTS: The Engineering Division has concerns
relating to the "piece meal" development which appears to be oc-
curing in the existing plat of Halley's First Addition.
Presently there are no existing public utilities (sanitary sewer,
storm sewer, water and upgraded streets to serve this area of
Eagan. There are no plans for utility extension into this area
included in the present 5 -year CIP. The Engineering Division
will be developing an updated 5 -year CIP in conjunction with
revising the City's Comprehensive Sewer, Storm Sewer, and Water
Distribution Plans during 1988.
1988 STREET MAP
1987 ZONING MAP
JANUARY 1987
LAND USE GUIDE PLAN MAP
79
•
P
Pt • •• •■•• 0.7 .5 1
�, 4 ,.
`_ : m h
0
0
021
GUN
r,
Li / vim' t. t;. .�.
010-82
W
z
v
CIS
•
550 5a •t
010-81
•r
•
2
site
C 6
=&3 5 S
1'
015-76
01-' 76
"0E18-7-5–
FART OF
021 -75
•
•
i /7. /C - /1 /a)
.
OHA/ YGniAlto 3
ROBE �., Yt /z39,oI t
COII 11113111( CRS, ^ ; F o
E NGINEE�lNG Ptit111iEn5 and LARD f unvEVOns gof loo w PAS 42- .,
COMPInNY, INC.
,1000 LAST 146m STREET, HURIISVILLE, UIIIIIESOTJ1 5537 Pll 4.12.-1000
6c l _ � c7- p >? i c n : LOT 3 BLOCK 2, HALLEY `S /sr ADD /T/ati!
DAKOTA Cov,V7y, MIN A16507:9
.C4LE /'' = 4d •
33.00
c L Z e ` ��c.z -~ - �r'�e y
,00
l
1
C9sg7!) pENOTES EX/Sri/VG ELEvAT /a,J
Cis �/.�) fENOTE5 PROP°SED EIEV4T /OA/
. m*
MID/ CAMS D/RGCT /OA1 OF SURFACE D4 /N4CE
9S5. O° = F /A/ /S//ED FLOOR ELEVAT /OA/
19 l j,5y
x x
O
t' x
i75 � y ; ;75
4
WES T
246.25
•,.. - — -
(9557 r,
/76,0
PRoyosED
BN/LO /N6
/[rte &EV. = ySS:o
risi =' fist.)
/76,o0
v „
0
m
Agenda Information Memo
April 19, 1988, City Council Meeting
REZONING /PRELIMINARY PLAT /HOSFORD ADDITION
F. Rezoning for Hosford Addition, John and Karen Hosford, of 5 A
Acres to an R -1 District and a Preliminary Plat Containing 4
Lots - -A public hearing was held by the Advisory Planning
Commission at their March 22 meeting to consider separate
applications for a rezoning of five acres from A to R -1 and a
preliminary plat for four lots entitled Hosford Addition. The
APC is recommending approval.
For a copy of the Planning and Engineering Department report, a
'
copy is enclosed on pages (p through /()S.
The Advisory Parks and Recreation Commission reviewed the
proposed development at their April 7 meeting, and are
recommending: 1) a cash dedication requirement and 2) a 5'
concrete sidewalk be placed along Deerwood Drive.
For a copy of the APC action on this item, refer to a copy of
those minutes found on page(s)00- ff.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To rezone A to R - a 5
acre parcel and a preliminary plat containing 4 lots located
south of Deerwood Drive, entitled Hosford Addition.
SUBJECT: REZONING /PRELIMINARY PLAT (HOSFORD ADDITION)
APPLICANT: JOHN & KAREN HOSFORD
LOCATION: SW 1/4 SECTION 22
EXISTING ZONING: AG (AGRICULTURAL)
DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: MARCH 22, 1988
DATE OF REPORT: MARCH 14, 1988
REPORTED BY: PLANNING & ENGINEERING DEPARTMENTS
APPLICATIONS:
Separate applications have been submitted requesting a rezoning of five ag.
(agricultural) acres to an R -1 (single family) district and a preliminary plat
for the Hosford Addition consisting of four lots located south of the Deerwood
Drive /Denmark Avenue intersection. This proposal is in conformance with the
City's most recent Land Use Plan.
EXISTING CONDITIONS /SITE PLAN
CITY OF EAGAN
Currently the Hosford's home is located on proposed Lot 3. They intend to
sell that and build on Lot 2 to the east. The site is heavily wooded and has
very steep slopes falling to both on and off site depressions. Development is
these areas is rather difficult without destroying much of the natural
characteristics of the land. As a result, staff is recommending the
elimination of the outlot that would make the connection to the unplatted
prOpertly to the west. If and when that piece develops, access can be
provided from Deerwood Drive. The temporary cul -de -sac that would have been
required will not be necessary. It would have created unnecessary grading in
that wooded area if the road would have eventually connected to the west.
Code requires a 50' minimum width at the street right-of-way line. Lots 2 and
3 need to be increased from 48' to 50' and 20' to 50', respectively. This can
easily be achieved with the elimination of the outlot.
The four lots give this plat an overall density of .8 units per acre and all
R -1 requirements can be fulfilled with the final plat. The existing home is
on a well /septic system and the applicant intends to connect to City utilities
as soon as possible.
GRADING /DRAINAGE /EROSION CONTROL: The grading proposed with this
development is limited to grading required for the proposed
street and three building pad locations. The grading plan
proposes an 8% street grade on the cul -de -sac with a 50' long 2%
landing area prior to entering Deerwood Drive. City code
requires that street grade should not exceed 2% for the first
100' approaching said intersection. The proposed building pad
elevation for Lot 2, Block 1 results in a proposed driveway grade
which exceeds the 10% grade as allowed by City Code.
A preliminary Erosion and Sediment Control Plan was not submitted
as a part of this application. An Erosion and Sediment Control
Plan must be submitted and approved by staff before a grading
permit can be issued or a final plat can be approved. The
Erosion and Sediment Control Plan should address, but is not
limited, to the following items:
Lot benching, seeding and mulching, rock construction
entrances, silt fence, identify individual responsible for
maintaining erosion and sediment control measures, storm sewer
inlet control, and rock access pad installation on individual
lots.
UTILITIES: Sanitary sewer service of sufficient depth and
capacity is readily available along Deerwood Drive. The
development proposes to construct an internal sanitary sewer
system which would serve each lot with individual services and
connect this internal system to the existing system in Deerwood
Drive.
Water main service to serve this development is readily available
in Deerwood Drive. The development will be required to take its
water main service from the existing 12" water main in Deerwood
Drive, not the 6" as proposed. The development is proposing a 6"
water main with water service proposed to each platted parcel.
STREETS /ACCESS /CIRCULATION: Access to the site is readily
available from Deerwood Drive and proposed in a location opposite
Denmark Avenue. A -50' wide cul -de -sac street is proposed to
serve the development.
EASEMENTS /RIGHT -OF- WAY /PERMITS:
A 40' half right -of -way is required for Deerwood Drive. The
development proposes right -of -way for the internal street in
accordance with City Code requirements.
The development is responsible for insuring that all regulatory
agency permits are acquired in the appropriate time frame as
required by the affected agency.
ASSESSMENTS: The parcel proposed for development has fulfilled
its assessment obligations for sanitary sewer trunk and water
area trunk. The underlying parcel has only partially fulfilled
assessment obligations for the following: Lateral benefit trunk
water main, street Deerwood Drivg, storm sewer lateral, and
sanitary sewer lateral.
The underlying parcel has the following pending assessment of
record:
PROJ # DESCRIPTION RATE QUANTITY AMOUNT
473 Storm sewer trunk .05 /sf 66,000 sf $3,300
TOTAL PENDING ASSESSMENT $3,300
The following assessments are proposed in accordance with City
Special Assessment Policy #82 -1:
PROJ # DESCRIPTION RATE QUANTITY AMOUNT
417 Lateral benefit sanitary $15.85/ff 115.69 $1,834
sewer
417 Lateral benefit water 6.55/ff 115.69 $ 758
main
417 Lateral benefit storm 20.83/ff 115.69 $2,410
sewer
417 Street 24.03/ff 115.69 $2,780
417 Storm sewer trunk .056 /ff 133,230 $7,461
TOTAL PROPOSED ASSESSMENT $15,243
All final assessment obligations will be calculated based on
final plat areas and dimensions and the rates in effect at the
time of final plat approval.
CONDITIONS: HOSFORD ADDITION
1. These standard conditions of plat approval as adopted by
Council action on September 15, 1987 shall be complied with:
A 1, B1, B2, B3, Cl, C2, C5, D1, El, Fl, & G1.
2. The existing home shall change its address to reflect the new
cul -de -sac name.
3. Outlot A shall be eliminated and the street right -of -way width
for Lots 2 and 3 shall be a minimum of 50'.
4. The well and septic system shall be abandoned to City Standards.
A. Assessments
STANDARD CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL
1. This development shall accept its additional assessment
obligations as defined in the staff's report in
accordance with the final plat dimensions and the rates
in effect at the time of final plat approval.
B. Easements and Rights - of - Way
1. This development shall dedicate 10' drainage and utility
easements centered over all common lot lines and adjacent
to private property or public right -of -way.
2. This development shall dedicate, provide, or financially
guarantee its proportionate share of the acquisition
costs of additional drainage, ponding, and utility
easements as required by the alignment, depth, and
storage capacity of all required public utilities and
streets located beyond the boundaries of this plat or
outside of dedicated public right -of -way as necessary to
service this development.
3. This development shall dedicate all public right -of -way
and temporary slope easements for ultimate development of
adjacent roadways as required by the appropriate
jurisdictional agency.
4. This development shall dedicate adequate drainage and
ponding easements to incorporate the required high water
elevation necessitated by City storm water storage volume
requirements.
C. Plans and Specifications
1. All public streets and utilities necessary to provide
service to this development shall be designed by a
registered professional engineer in accordance with City
codes and engineering .standards and policies, and
approved by staff prior to final plat approval.
2. A detailed grading, drainage, erosion, and sediment
control plan must be prepared in accordance with current
City standards and approved by staff prior to final plat
approval.
3. This development shall insure that all temporary dead end
public streets shall have a cul -de -sac constructed in
accordance with City engineering standards.
4. A detailed landscape plan shall be submitted on the
proposed grading plan and approved by staff prior to the
final plat approval. The financial guarantee shall be
included in the Development Contract and not released
until one year after the date of installation.
",(1
STANDARD CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL
PAGE TWO
Revised:
5. All internal public and private streets shall be
constructed within the required right -of -way in
accordance with City design standards.
D. Public Improvements
1. If any public improvements are to be installed under a
City contract, the appropriate project must be approved
by Council action prior to final plat approval.
E. Permits
LT S;# 2
STANDARD
1. This development shall be responsible for the acquisition
of all regulatory agency permits in the time frame
required by the affected agency.
F. Parks Dedication
1. This development shall fulfull its parks dedication
requirements as recommended by the Advisory Parks and
Recreation Commission and approved by Council action.
G. Other
1. All standard platting and zoning conditions shall be
adhered to unless specifically granted a variance by
Council action.
Approved: August 25, 1987 September 15, 1987
Advisory Planning Commission City Council
LOCATION
ZONING
LAND USE
' 2 \ c\
[EMIT.
r`r
•
S tit y13 '•S�`���'
NfiKt y l --,� ,
t y -'o�° = •
_
{ L {• ��
2— -- -
t
ml
.. rr1 IV
CL - � •j
oll
Ili: ':- lc.i,:;i -' i .
''''''--.L'_-7- _i -V;5
4
It
k. c r
"' ,, , ' 1 1 1 1 f 1, / �- 'r
jgd ,
x\! 0;;
s , ' .t ■ I r ! . . I, 1 • •,,
1 ■ 1 ' ....-•• , -- ...„,...-- „..-• -...
- \ . • 0
• : .4 \`,, S \\ \',. IV \ a 1 \ .2!„ ...%.. ■%:......-:: 7,
• ' \ \ \'' l' \ °'\'-' \ ; \ \ '.1-7-7:;:.:: .,..7 '
• - q, \ , \ ‘ ‘A ' 1 1 ' , , \ A ‘
‘\‘‘‘‘, 1 ,',`,` \ I\ 1 , 1 ',\:0 .1 ;\ \'‘■;\ ;;
\\■ ‘ ` 3
\ \,' ''' ', <-'
■‘,\;i ' ' - -
. ‘',-1■;‘, ;',\`'‘‘',,\\\,.\ \I \ ■ \ \\‘`„'\
),,,,
'‘‘'''.\\‘'■ \ ,; ‘ ‘ ‘\ n ■‘ s , \s , , .
I I.' • '
---- / . 1 , / i . c '‘; ...,\‘‘`i
/ '• I 1 , , 3 \ \ , \\ \ \ .. ..; ,,,,, ■
c 1, ,....., ...,,,
.7.-_-_ , , ,1 l, t , , 1 , ,. ... 0 ,
--,_...." • : 3 1 \ \ , . ‘
.......:\ \‘‘, ‘‘, „...,,,,,, ,, \ \ \ , q
1 0" \ ‘ •:\ • sl
, 1 t i \‘‘ \ `, ' ,; ' \ ' \ \ '1
7
—
.
, 4:: '.. _ • . , , - ~-4.4.:- - -' ,- 42? - 75.t., '..
. ''' .:' I , ' './ " ...,: -.' ..: A ""! j.1.4%."`,:if -...•.';',*:. ,5t.•
- .;;j;- , (4 --!....-•,-1.;:. . .`i
-A..... !;,...' •!..,-1,4'...;-•
..-4;-..r.''...' J • •‘' . . I :
INN =I - niv ' .! 7 1 1 .... • •• . • •... ■
0 .
........ ..0.4 04 044
'—' .■ • , • ' •-'. ' . .14, 7 I. ,000/. !LAU
` 1
•
''' : - - 7.• • '..... - ..' QW"" " ". ,\_ ,
..- ..-• , ..". ei • ' -
' ‘ \ ' •
. , - - - -, 1 I „. • , ■:;. ,
0;,- . 2 S.... \\ .... S\ 1 \ .... \ ...Z \
.: .. I \ . ' . r - cAr,... 1 4. _ ._...
i) - rr- - - •-.)
\ . . •..
- ..-- ,-. t) \- ,••....., •-
i ' ,' i !_i f •-■ ':-.
-",'
PRELIMINARY PLAT OF
,HOSFOF,Z0 FIRST ADDITION
• • .
mii•Ism BENEFIT - SANITARY SEWER - 115.69 F.F.
,'••■•■•-- LATERAL WATER - 115.69 F.F.
D \
,•
• - • -
•-•'• r.f
• •
-
PROM .••• /•••.1f.
a••••••••••■•••■,•
... • ft...4
es•••••••
Pm.. PE 1110 •■••••11•
••••••■••■••• se.. 141 11 1•••• I. *Ant ••• F.. et •••
wort• ••• SO 1.• 8. 6•.1•••• p•••••• O... 11.
•••••••■• 11, •••••• 31. ••••••■ (••••1, •■•••••••••.
1.11
••=1.• roil....
••••• ••••• •••• • 1.4 ••••••
pit. • lono • ...mt. f•-•
1.011
WM I, III.. 1 .114.
L. 1. Var. I se.•. 1114. ••••••
.4 •ier• I N... .•■••
• I. al, • • I... ...or 1.•
•••
0••••• 1 1. al.. 1 ••••....• ••• .••••• me... et
11 C..4 • f••••• •••••••• ••• ••••.
11 •••• ••• ••••••• <Of ,,,,,
11 ••••••••• ••• .tlia• •••■■••• a.... CO ■••• is
•■••• •.••• •. I ••••• •••■ •••• ■■•••• ••• 1.•
.••••••■•••
••••••••■••• 111. 1•11111
- •
•■•••••••.. sm.. a. WV.. Lisa ••■•••••■•• 11W.
•••••■... ,,,,,
• Ars.. •••••■• •11-1•.•
1 .•.• ttttt ag sa v. al aa. ••• 1st.. .1 p.n... dm ■••■••
•••• ••••• ,,,,, as a ••••
••• ..... ••••••••as.
•
Z frwf
Yea Se a V,Int
• • . *an
Cesesets /4-49
• • .•
DELMAR H. SCHWANZ
14•••••••:••11..r•neal•
••• •••••
11•••••••••
::emu �. ::•>
• 1
0 \, ,' •{
\ fit) ( ` • fY . l .
\ \,, , `� I t� iit� "i 1{ii�i }L ) : Vii
' \` �`�,\ \1;1; ? }i1 ii: -.1
� yt < }Iki,
pia '\' i `,�k�,�:ri`•�:.7 {V} ,
_,,,
•
t ` I • �+
4 \ L
• L -t_ -1 1111
•
•
uhf i if=
•
•
-.. rs ..r sr•i
•• I
PRELIMINARY PLAT OF
,,HOSFORD . FIRST ADDITION
'.
•311-1 •»
•
.n
. .... .•. 1111.•:. "w
L1 n -
'
••�.�w. �. 1111..
Arrogo
DELMAR H. BCHWANZ
'JP-49
818.1
830.0
_.•
2
?.1
:0
J P - 4
24 844.0
846.5 ‘.
JP-5
823.8
834 0
-b
56
city of eagan
PUBLIC
Xi) WORKS
DEPARTMEN
•
.6543 16 0
J , V ,L21; 78492-
4 .846.5 18
J
J-b
_ - •
.1
JP-G
, i 818.9
830.0
1 ,
JP --
870.6 j p_ 3 5
673. ... 2 ., -869.4
872.4
8 59 . 4f::;::: '
8 6 5. 2::::::: .
.....
.7,7 JP-4 ...../.•!.1 JP-8
819.2
830.0
• ...,, ...../ %,...,,,---:--' -,
1 \ i 1 ::, .•,_-_ • _ ,' r - s* - 6 - „,..0 0. 1
` i _ :I • CP-63 ....‘
ill
•- -_ • 7- 1!
74.5 • ; I
1 - •
, . •
P-17 I
87.1 I - • •
92.0 • • 7 - - 840.5
- 850.0..
-.- 27" -
•
•
,
LS.- 27
ri.
/ 15
.--;---t-- --..,
L.S.- 14
C.77.1 820.8
830.0
)5
JP- I 0
12"
JP-1 I
815.7
830.0
- 85810
t -4411MINNI
LP-44
851.1
; 846.0 LP - 43
853.8
STORM SEWER
MASTER PLAN
i
JP-63
899.7
900.7 -, ,.• ..
JP-44
890.7
9 895.7
I r7.1_
48" -
892.:
893..
de•
E
t.:
•
J I
9
9
JP-51
976.0
r 9 , S J - e e
1 LLCE.
1 1
/
- - • ,
' • • - L.L -
• . ••••
898 0
------- 903 5
LP-54 /11.`2.C 0
%woo "m "rneft,"
7 1
SUBJECT PARCEL
approved:
F
standard
plate 3+:
P
.11M. ANIIMM 41■1M •
1
1
imoto. ' •
.; • • „
' -I. 3
1 C- HI I -__ c ane :MEP 1
1
it I
r.4 I 312" 1 I
1
_ /r,„- 3
, 0 • C 61)
iasstsi
27
•1111111114.... -■■■••■••
city of eagaii
PUBLIC
FC\V WORKS
DEPARTMENT
r -s C-NN
11- 4 Go
27 15
AI
/• , • ,
_
•■•••■•
c MM
•-•1■111MV -•-••■•■••• -.1••■•
z.4
i l
SANITARY SEWER
MASTER PLAN
.1
1 C - P P
1
1 0'
1
1
J-T • _
•
■ - 1 _ _ _
7 _
111
•;
;
C- Y
•
11-11- ., i 4
: •
12
• , 4 - • •
=M. -7 - • 7 _,_
r‘
a
• •
. • •
F I G 2
approved :
standard
plate
532/68.9. -4•111 ...",„„ iiten - mms . 4 - %,,, r ,,•,) r r
. .:0'. , , ! , ..--'-'-- 50.4/67.0
I _: - 11 if.' .P aill.ci --
I : ti ---
LI, ! . ; ! ; .
7- r —,,,,,■1' ____
Firrj 7,— 12"
C ' 14 ' 44 D9 OM WO dallb el= QM OM 61111
16 1 A Or)rTirte .;:.
i
' 4 7
....3(( N
..'s-,
,-..%:.%.,.
'.-1 -
, ,OVPi? t '• •-•=•:-: ^ .-
12`'-- 1 - --7-.7.-ra- 1 ' - -
rasessmamimingi_es. OM
CD120 59 9/ 75 '1 .
f i
12"
42 6/57'0
city of eagan
r 4. 34 PUBLIC
WORKS
E DEPARTMENT
, \ ,
1 : P 4 ' - r■- • .'r, " 7
._ _:, • 1.Z71.11:71-
-- - 1 ‘, . • .
it
MID 42111. MED SIMI Ci■I SIM — ota„.. ,„„;,;, cum „<1 ,,.
ce.........i....................
i 0 2
,.:. ' 68.0/ 82.0
68 0/
12" . ■ - 1020 11
69,0/77n . 72 .0 ?0"
'zi.6(43.0 Fr ; - ii: IA 1 LLL
,. , i,
35.5/50.0 238 I 12
i i
_. . ....._. .
184 68 7/ 74 0
86.0/ 9 .0
1
1 ' 7—
4__A I
•17.'1
r• • '
r
- •
PA !
FA OA
t;
PaRK
1
i2 I
j
TQ75
NiC.17.17^p'El
f:triE'tH Lri
3
0 16"
184/290
20" 1
19 1
- 31. 0 1 I
45.6/58 0
\
ZO2
-.3
316"
3 53.1 /68 0
1 - — a ft* =MP CO
54.6/71.0
51.4 /65.0
20'
SUBJECT PA RCEL
6 1 .4 G. GROUND Si
5000 GPM. 800.
H.W. L. 105'
CO 70 8 / 76.(
MEM
1020
••■•••
( 203 4 3.3 /5 8.0
WATER
MASTER PLAN
approved :
-4
FIG 3
standard
plata if
APC Minutes
March 22, 1988
4. This development shall dedicate all public right -of -way and
temporary slope easements for ultimate development of adjacent
roadways as required by the appropriate jurisdictional agency.
5. A detailed grading, drainage, erosion, and sediment control
plan must be prepared in accordance with current City standards and
approved by staff prior to final plat approval.
6. This development shall be responsible for the acquisition of
all regulatory agency permits in the time frame required by the
affected agency.
7. This development shall fulfill its parks dedication
requirements as recommended by the Advisory Parks and Recreation
Commission and approved by Council action.
8. All standard platting and zoning conditions shall be adhered
to unless specifically granted a variance by Council action.
9. The applicant shall connect to City water on Lot 1.
All voted in favor.
HOSFORD ADDITION - REZONING & PRELIMINARY PLAT
Chairman Tim Pawlenty convened the public hearing in regard to
the applications of John and Karen Hosford for rezoning of five A
(Agricultural) acres to R -1 (Single Family) district, and a
preliminary plat containing 4 lots located south of Deerwood Drive
in the southwest quarter of Section 22. Mr. Sturm described the
proposal in detail and indicated that it was staff's recommendation
that a stub street not be provided with the understanding that the
property to the west could have access to Deerwood Drive. This
would also allow the widths of all lots to meet City Code standards.
Mr. John Hosford was present and indicated that he was flexible
and willing to proceed as directed by the City. He did point out
that the Fritzes that own the,property to his west, had expressed a
desire to develop within one or two years. It appeared that there
was not adequate space along the front of the Fritz's property to
provide a street access from Deerwood Drive. He then described a
proposed overall plan that would include the Rocco Altobelli
property also west of the Fritz property. This proposal was
intended to save as many trees as possible.
Mr. Mike Kohler, the owner of the property east of the Hosford
property, questioned the repercussions of such a development on his
property.
APC Minutes
March 22, 1988
Mr. Colbert indicated that staff has not reviewed the Hosford's
overall plan but that apparently no assessment of the Kohler
property will be involved. Mr. Kohler suggested that he would have
some problem developing his property in the future.
Mr. Bob Wolfgang, a property owner to the south, indicated his
concern in regard to the southerly portion of the property which Mr.
Hosford stated would remain a three -acre parcel with his new home.
Mr. Voracek questioned the ability to provide a 2% grade for the
100 feet adjacent to Deerwood Drive. He also questioned the 10%
grade for the Lot 2 driveway.
Mr. Hosford indicated that he wanted to build his new home in
June and would follow whatever staff recommendations were made,
rather than request a continuance. Mr. Voracek suggested that staff
work with the landowner to arrive at a ultimate plan that could be
recommended to the City Council.
Mr. Merkley suggested that the northwesterly lot appeared
somewhat unbuildable. Mr. Colbert indicated that setbacks may be
met and water and sewer available, thus resulting in a building lot.
Voracek moved, Trygg seconded the motion to recommend rezoning
the five acre parcel to R -1 Single Family district. All voted in
favor.
Voracek moved, Merkley seconded the motion to recommend approval
of the preliminary plat, subject to the following conditions:
1. This development shall accept its additional assessment
obligations as defined in the staff's report in accordance with the
final plat dimensions and the rates in effect at the time of final
plat approval.
2. This development shall dedicate 10 foot drainage and utility
easements centered over all common lot lines and adjacent to private
property or public right -of -way.
3. This development shall dedicate, provide, or financially
guarantee its proportionate share of the acquisition costs of
additional drainage, ponding, and utility easements as required by
the alignment, depth, and storage capacity of all required public
utilities and streets located beyond the boundaries of this plat or
outside of dedicated public right -of -way as necessary to service
this development.
4. This development shall dedicate all public right -of -way and
temporary slope easements for ultimate development of adjacent
roadways as required by the appropriate jurisdictional agency.
7
i
0`1
APC Minutes
March 22, 1988
5. All public streets and utilities necessary to provide
service to this development shall be designed by a registered
professional engineer in accordance with City codes and engineering
standards and policies, and approved by staff prior to final plat
approval.
6. A detailed grading, drainage, erosion, and sediment control
plan must be prepared in accordance with current City standards and
approved by staff prior to final plat approval.
7. All internal public and private streets shall be constructed
within the required right -of -way in accordance with City design
standards.
8. If any public improvements are to be installed under a City
contract, the appropriate project must be approved by Council action
prior to final plat approval.
9. This development shall be responsible for the acquisition of
all regulatory agency permits in the time frame required by the
affected agency.
10. This development shall fulfill its parks dedication
requirements as recommended by the Advisory Parks and Recreation
Commission and approved by Council action.
11. All standard platting and zoning conditions shall be
adhered to unless specifically granted a variance by Council action.
12. The existing home shall change its address to reflect the
new cul -de -sac name.
13. Outlot A shall be eliminated and the street right -of -way
width for Lots 2 and 3 shall be a minimum of 50 feet.
14. The well and septic system shall be abandoned to City
standards.
15. City staff shall work with the owner and property owners to
the west to determine whether a cul -de -sac should be constructed on
the Hosford property or a stub street with a turn - around on the
Fritz property, or a cul -de -sac on to the Fritz property with a
recommendation to be made to the City Council.
All voted yes.
It was noted that if the situation was not resolved by City
staff, that the City Council would have to address the issue.
Agenda Information Memo
April 19, 1988, City Council Meeting
PRELIMINARY PLAT /NORTHVIEW ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
G. Preliminary Plat for Northview Elementary School /ISD #196 for
39.23 Acre Northview Elementary School Site Plat - -A public
hearing was held at the March 24, 1988 Advisory Planning
Commission meeting, to consider an application submitted by
Independent School District #196 requesting a preliminary plat
for the Northview Elementary School Addition consisting of two
(2) lots on the north side of Diffley Road east of Lexington
Avenue. This plat contains a total of 39.23 acres with the
school located on the 16.18 acre Lot 1. The existing recreation
fields would be platted as Lot 2. The APC is recommending
approval of the platting. There were additional conditions
attached by the APC and the most significant is the resolution of
a driveway location /restricted access to Diffley Road.
For additional information on this item, refer to the Planning
and Engineering Department report, a copy is enclosed on pages
I / V through ) l g .
Enclosed on page ((9 is a copy of the Advisory Parks and
Recreation Commission a tion.
For a copy of the APC action on this item, refer to those
minutes, a copy is enclosed on page (s) lab — 1a.3
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the
preliminary plat for Northview Elementary School as stated.
e
APPLICATION:
.ice 1 � yr l.illU L1 ♦i
SUBJECT: PRELIMINARY PLAT - NORTHVIEW ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
APPLICANT: INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT 196
LOCATION: SW 1/4 SECT 23
EXISTING ZONING: P.F. (PUBLIC FACILITIES)
DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: MARCH 24, 1988
DATE OF REPORT: MARCH 14, 1988
REPORTED BY: PLANNING & ENGINEERING DEPARTMENTS
An application has been submitted requesting a preliminary plat for the
Northview Elementary School Addition consisting of two lots on the north side
of Diffley Road just east of Lexington Avenue. This plat contains a total of
39.23 acres with the school on 16.18 acre Lot 1. Lot 2 is for the proposed
recreation fields that will be constructed in conjunction with the middle
school/high school development. This property was never platted when the
first phase of the school was constructed in the early 1960's. Since then,
adc.itions have enlarged the school to its existing size. This plat is more of
a 'clean -up' process - no additional building construction is planned at this
time.
Code requires that every platted lot have public access. This is not provided
for Lot 2. Staff recommends platting the entire parcel as one lot to
eliminate this problem. The high school parcel was also platted as a single
lot.
The County Highway Department has placed a restricted access along the north
side of County Road 30. Locations of streets that serve the commercial
property to the south and the school access points need to line up for both
circulation and safety : ;rposes. Currently, there are three curb cuts into
the school property. _ :1 locations, as well as the number of access points,
need to be resolved - r.r to final plat submission. This may require the
relocation of entrance _ations and reconfiguration of the parking lot at the
front of the building. Staff is concerned that major modifications to the
entry locations may not :.e in the best interest of the school district as far
as vehicular circulation is concerned, especially since bus movements must be
in a counter clockwise fashion so children do not cross in front of traffic
during loading and unloading periods.
A landscape plan has been submitted and staff recommends shifting some of the
plant material on site to better utilize that material. This can be
accomplished with the final plat submission.
GRADING /DRAINAGE /EROSION CONTROL: The site grading proposed
with this development involves the area north and west of the
existing elementary school facility. The proposed grading plan
calls for cuts ranging from 10' -17' along the southerly line of
Lot 2 and fill areas of 11' to 30' in the wooded areas along the
northerly side of Lot 2 adjacent to the undeveloped portion of
Northview Park. The site development proposes to fill in an area
of Pond JP -29. Pond JP -29 is a designated ponding area in the
City's Comprehensive Storm Sewer Plan. Further analysis is
required to determine if the proposed filling of Pond JP -29 will
be allowed.
The storm sewer for the area of proposed Lot 2 was addressed in
the February 18, 1988, site plan review associated with the high
school /middle school development. Staff is currently working
with the School District's engineer to determine the most
appropriate storm sewer requirements.
A preliminary erosion and sediment control plan was submitted for
review with this application. The following items were not
adequately addressed in the grading plan submitted:
Stabilization of disturbed areas, protection of adjacent
properties, protection of cut and fill slopes from upland
drainage areas, stabilization of proposed waterways and storm
sewer outlets, inlet protection around catch basins, construction
access routes, and disposition and maintenance of erosion control
measures.
UTILITIES / EASEMENTS /PERMITS /RIGHTS -OF -WAY: No water main or
sanitary sewer lateral extensions are required to serve the
proposed development.
A ponding easement will be required to incorporate the required
high water level for Pond JP -29.
A 60' half right -of -way will be required for Diffley Road.
The development will be responsible for ensuring that all
regulatory agency permits are acquired in the appropriate time
frame as required by the affected agency.
ASSESSMENTS: The Northview Elementary School site has previously
been levied assessments for sanitary sewer trunk, water trunk,
and water lateral benefit from trunk water main under Project #'s
299 and 304.
A storm sewer area trunk assessment is pending under Project 479.
City records show this pending assessment to be $67,425.
1 \\
r AQ
The following assessments are proposed in accordance with present
City special assessment policies as a condition of final plat
approval:
F'ROJ # DESCRIPTION RATE QTY
479 Storm Sewer Trunk Upgrade $.027 /sf 1,630,886
Future County Rd. 30 111.70 /ff 1,303.92
Future Trailway 13.00 /ff 1,303.92
TOTAL PROPOSED ASSESSMENT
The final assessment amount will be determined using final plat
dimensions and areas and in accordance with the rates in effect
at the time of final plat approval.
CONDITIONS: NORTHVIEW ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
1. These standard conditions of plat approval as adopted by Council
action on September 15, 1987 shall be complied with: Al, Bl, B2,
B3, B4, Cl, C2, C4, F1, and Gl.
AMT
$ 44,03-
145, 64
16,95:
$206,64:
A. Assessments
STANDARD CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL
1. This development shall accept its additional assessment
obligations as defined in the staff's report in
accordance with the final plat dimensions and the rates
in effect at the time of final plat approval.
B. Easements and Rights -of -Way
1. This development shall dedicate 10' drainage and utility
easements centered over all common lot lines and adjacent
to private property or public right -of -way.
2. This development shall dedicate, provide, or financially
guarantee its proportionate share of the acquisition
costs of additional drainage, ponding, and utility
easements as required by the alignment, depth, and
storage capacity of all required public utilities and
streets located beyond the boundaries of this plat or
outside of dedicated public right -of -way as necessary to
service this development.
3. This development shall dedicate all public right -of -way
and temporary slope easements for ultimate development of
adjacent roadways as required by the appropriate
jurisdictional agency.
4. This development shall dedicate adequate drainage and
ponding easements to incorporate the required high water
elevation necessitated by City storm water storage volume
requirements.
C. Plans and Specifications
1. All public streets and utilities necessary to provide
service to this development shall be designed by a
registered professional engineer in accordance with City
codes and engineering standards and policies, and
approved by staff prior to final plat approval.
2. A detailed grading, drainage, erosion, and sediment
control plan must be prepared in accordance with current
City standards and approved by staff prior to final plat
approval.
3. This development shall insure that all temporary dead end
public streets shall have a cul -de -sac constructed in
accordance with City engineering standards.
4. A detailed landscape plan shall be submitted on the
proposed grading plan and approved by staff prior to the
final plat approval. The financial guarantee shall be
included in the Development Contract and not released
until one year after the date of installation.
13
STANDARD CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL
PAGE TWO
5. All internal public and private streets shall be
constructed within the required right -of -way in
accordance with City design standards.
D. Public Improvements
1. If any public improvements are to be installed under a
City contract, the appropriate project must be approved
by Council action prior to final plat approval.
E. Permits
1. This development shall be responsible for the acquisition
of all regulatory agency permits in the time frame
required by the affected agency.
F. Parks Dedication
1. This development shall fulfull its parks dedication
requirements as recommended by the Advisory Parks and
Recreation Commission and approved by Council action.
G. Other
1. All standard platting and zoning conditions shall be
adhered to unless specifically granted a variance by
Council action.
Approved:
Revised:
LTS #2
STANDARD
Advisory Planning Commission City Council
Augu 5, 1987 September 15, 1987
• t
• toot.S,C0 rt
-7-•;;G--; OTI
y.
rve . .0
5
pc-,sr
--- •
1-1,
■.ENSIN: •
'; PLACE
AZ:7
i :741 e�
ICo
GOAT
MILL
PARK
WALNUT O.
A
ti
i
II I II l 11 ' I E
i ! 11 � I Iii �E r l l i III 'l ! � E I!
f : ' 1 � lli f��I 1 1 �
�1 I ! 1 1 iI if i 1 i �1 ;1110 � 11 ;II 9!
! � t .! f ' e 1� , 1 9 :31 !I}!1 11 , 11
s Y ! {E 1 '�1 !I! 1� E7E7i Ill E{ X11 !hill � �� j1
311 1 1I 1 1111 111 11 111 ill 11 111 II'i' 11 !1 l 50
__ —
sf \
/7. f, . ft - - i
ft ;
N
Il
!1s:
(!)
:'2
a al
•
2
sr f
3; Se, k•1 '•l otr w M rr i. t.., ..L.
1
cc =
z
Z N .2
F.
o
o e
c ° ;
. w :o
J =
.3
oc� - °.
w Z 000
r W ...
•
4
3 °
C T.OF/
. /I.6YN
*la ICJ 'll K N W V — /- -t � .� l.• M w�aW
•
:It olrid
fampuels
1
==.1■11.41.
: panoidde
1202:1Vd 103 r n
OF e
•
J-r
O'09
g I 8
I Z- dr
\‘ )) ( 0-r
d /
•4
• 0'098
O'VL8
6I-d(
NV1d 831SVVI
el3M3S VJOIS
.9 *S' cA
C•Zg8
OZ -dr
L
t'
£
12-dr
oa 8
9 8
• b
• 1.
7Nt• nos -
!•
b • ,
0"2L
,
02 d r
Z
g LLB
:6> 8g -dr ict
•Iz 1 -,'
I '
\r, / ,• •
0 1
aa-r 0
09L6
-ci
L2
\\
\
•
.4
—
• '
ZS 6 9
- .7, • 1.'068 ,
1 t7
c . b .o L ., _.t7dr
• 62 E668 •
ZI • 29
69 . .1 .';
cR:69
917-dr.''"`
rs
9
I
• 2 I
0
g
1
,0j1 • -,±
;7 !i■ t
• - - •
0
0 968
L- dr
•
u-r
1
. § . 69
- 0 - A
2-dr T
.
+t.N) "#
OT
2 I -dr
NOWIENd30
SNHOM
onond
uubve ,to iijo
•■••••••,..-
MEMORANDUM
TO: THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
1i-FROM: KEN VRAA, DIRECTOR OF PARKS & RECREATION
DATE: APRIL 12, 1988
SUBJECT: NORTHVIEW ELEMENTARY SCHOOL /PRELIMINARY PLAT
The Advisory Parks & Recreation Commission reviewed the proposed
Northview Elementary School plat at its April 7th, Advisory Com-
mission meeting. Dr. Tom Wilson, Principal on Special Assign-
ment, was present at that meeting, representing School District
#196. The Commission had several inquiries regarding the siting
of the school fields, noting that staff had made a recommendation
for the diversion of water away from Northview Park. Mr. Wilson
noted that the Engineering Department, District Architects, and
Engineers have investigated this problem, and that the utility
plan will be revised to exclude the overflow from a pipe source
onto Northview Park.
There being no further discussion from the Advisory Commission,
the Commission made a recommendation to the City Council to ap-
prove the facility, athletic field layout, and preliminary plat
for Northview Elementary School.
KV /bls
cc: Marilyn Wucherpfennig, Planning Aide
Ed Kirsch, Senior Engineering Technician
MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING - EAGAN ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION
EAGAN, MINNESOTA
MARCH 24, 1988
A regular meeting of the Eagan Advisory Planning Commission was
held on Thursday, March 24, 1988 at 7:00 p.m. at the Eagan Municipal
Center. Present were Chairman Pawlenty, Members Voracek, Wilkins,
Trygg, Miller and Merkley. Absent were members Graves and Garry.
Also present were Assistant City Engineer Mike Foertsch, Assistant
Planner Jim Sturm, and Assistant City Attorney David Keller.
AGENDA
Wilkins moved, Trygg seconded the motion to approve the agenda
as provided by staff, noting that there were no minutes to approve
at this time. All voted yea.
NORTHVIEW ELEMENTARY SCHOOL - ISD #196 - PRELIMINARY PLAT
Chairman Pawlenty convened the first public hearing of the
evening in regard to the application of Independent School District
#196 requesting a preliminary plat for the Northview Elementary
School Addition consisting of 2 lots on the north side of Diffley
Road, just east of Lexington Avenue. Mr. Sturm described the parcel
immediately west of the middle school -high school site consisting of
39.2 acres. The applicant had requested a two lot configuration,
although staff suggested that it remain one lot due to the lack of
public access to the northerly portion. Mr. Sturm noted that staff
had received a letter from the County recommending the closing of
the middle driveway access to the school.
Mr. Mike Dougherty, attorney for the school district, was
present indicating that no construction was anticipated in the plat
which would consist of grading for athletic fields for the middle
school. He indicated the school was concerned about the County
restricting the access along Diffley Road, but that the situation
could be resolved between the County and the City.
Member Wilkins expressed concern that there were no parking
facilities near the northwesterly fields. Mr. Dougherty indicated
that the middle school would use those fields mainly during the day,
although there as a Joint Powers Agreement with the City for the use
of the fields by the City. Member Wilkins suggested that the school
district should provide some parking in this area.
t - 1 t'L .'1111ULZ..
March 24, 1988
Mr. Sturm indicated there is a walking path to an existing
parking lot. Ms. Trygg asked Mr. Dougherty if the one -lot
configuration was acceptable to the school district, to which he
indicated in the affirmative.
Member Voracek questioned the 12 feet of fill on the northerly
portion of the fields and suggested that it would make sense to tier
the fields from the school to the track down to the northerly ball
fields. Mr. Foertsch indicated that could be explored while
reviewing the drainage and grading plan, including the filling of
Pond JP -29 and impact on trees.
Mr. Dougherty advised Chairman Pawlenty that the school district
was concerned with the ability to provide a turnaround for buses
without enlarging the parking lot. In regard to the filling around
trees, Mr. Sturm indicated that the Park Commission would have a
copy of the Advisory Planning Commission minutes and staff would
discuss the issue at that time. He also advised Mr. Pawlenty that
the platting was part of the clean up process in the City to
eventually provide that all land would be platted.
Mr. Merkley questioned whether the County could change the
access to Diffley Road if the property was not platted. He also
questioned whether an area in front of the building just north of
Diffley could be converted to parking lot. Mr. Dougherty suggested
that because of the time constraints, the developer would be
submitting a grading permit request for the middle school fields
even if the preliminary plat did not go forward.
Member Wilkins questioned whether emergency vehicles would be
able to reach the fields on the existing and proposed pathways. Mr.
Steve Hanson of District #196 indicated that all trailways within
the school district were wide enough to support a snow plow used to
clear the paths. - -
Mr. Pawlenty questioned Mr. Sturm as to the Commission's ability
to recommend that the City, County and Developer work out the access
problems prior to final plat approval. Mr. Foertsch stated that the
standards conditions did not prevent the applicant from addressing
the access issues.
Voracek moved, Wilkins seconded the motion to recommend approval
of the preliminary plat, subject to the following conditions:
1. This development shall accept its additional assessment
obligations as defined in the staff's report in accordance with the
final plat dimensions and the rates in effect at the time of final
plat approval.
t .
March 24, 1988
2. This development shall dedicate 10 foot drainage and utility
easements centered over all common lot lines and adjacent to private
property or public right -of -way.
3. This development shall dedicate, provide, or financially
guarantee its proportionate share of the acquisition costs of
additional drainage, ponding, and utility easements as required by
the alignment, depth, and storage capacity of all required public
utilities and streets located beyond the boundaries of this plat or
outside of dedicated public right -of -way as necessary to service
this development.
4. This development shall dedicate all public right -of -way and
temporary slope easements for ultimate development of adjacent
roadways as required by the appropriate jurisdictional agency.
5. This development shall dedicate adequate drainage and
ponding easements to incorporate the required high water elevation
necessitated by City storm water storage volume requirements.
6. All public streets and utilities necessary to provide
service to this development shall be designed by a registered
professional engineer in accordance with City codes and engineering
standards and policies, and approved by staff prior to final plat
approval.
7. A detailed grading, drainage, erosion, and sediment control
plan must be prepared in accordance with current City standards and
approved by staff prior to final plat approval.
8. A detailed landscape plan shall be submitted on the proposed
grading plan and approved by staff prior to the final plat approval.
The financial guarantee shall be included in the Development
Contract and not released until one year after the date of
installation.
9. This development shall fulfill its parks dedication
requirements as recommended by the Advisory Parks and Recreation
Commission and approved by Council action.
10. All standard platting and zoning conditions shall be
adhered to unless specifically granted a variance by Council action.
11. The City, County and School District shall pursue
resolution of the access issue on Diffley Road.
12. The parcel shall be platted as one lot as agreed by the
developer.
13. The staff shall review possible access and parking for the
ball parks and the requirements of the Joint Powers Agreement.
APC Minutes
March 24, 1988
14. All pathways shall be constructed to standards acceptable
for passage of emergency vehicles.
All voted yes.
OUNTRY HOLLOW 2ND ADDITION - COMPREHENSIVE GUIDE PLAN AMENDMENT'
REZONING AND PRELIMINARY PLAT
The second public hearing of the evening was convened by Mr.
Pawlenty in regard to the applications of Progress Land/Company
requesting a rezoning of 13.53 AG (Agricultural) acres to R -1
(Single Family) district and a preliminary plat for the Country
Hollow 2nd Addition. Mr. Sturm described the plat consisting of 32
lots located no 'rth of County Road #30 and east of Dodd Road and the
First Addition. 'The January 1987 Land Use Plan designated the area
as a mixture of\D -II (Mixed Residential, 0 -6 units /acre) and N.B.
(Neighborhood Business). He then described the steeply sloped
parcel surrounded by 'unplatted Agricultural land on the north and
south, the General Business zoned Clarkson Place to the east and the
99 previously platted single family lots to the west. He noted that
staff had recommended that roads be stubbed for future access rather
than left as outlots. All lots did meet minimum code requirements.
\_
Mr. Warren Isrealson of \Progress Land Company was present to
respond to questions. Mr. Foertsch advised member Voracek that the
outlots should remain outlots because the stub streets were not
accessable to maintenance crews. \ Mr. Voracek also questioned the
2:1 slopes which Mr. Foertsch said would be addressed in. the
approved drainage and grading plan. He also advised that standard
condition B -4 includes all ponding requirements.
Member Wilkins asked Mr. Isrealson\ if as a developer he had
tried to acquire the Gordon property. She questioned whether a
stub street would be stub into the N.B. area. Mr. Sturm suggested
that the street might end up being N.B. on the east and R -2 on the
west. It was noted that due to the large slope from the Clarkson
property, a retaining wall would be necessar,if slope easements
could not be obtained. �\
Mr. Foertsch noted that staff does require retaining walls if
3:1 slope cannot be maintained pursuant to standard condition C -2.
Mr. Merkley suggested and engineer Foertsch agreed that the
extension of the 12 foot sanitary sewer trunk to the north of the
property line from the previous addition should be made an
additional condition. N
Voracek moved, Merkley seconded the motion to recommend approval
of the Comprehensive Guide Amendment of 13.53 acres AGN.
(Agricultural) to R -I. All voted yes.
Agenda Information Memo
April 19, 1988, City Council Meeting
COMP GUIDE, REZONING AND PRELIMINARY PLAT
COUNTRY HOLLOW 2ND ADDITION
H. Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment, Rezoning of 13.53 A to R-
1 and a Preliminary Plat Consisting of 32 Lots Described as
Country Hollow 2nd Addition - -A public hearing was held by the
Advisory Planning Commission at their last regular meeting held
on March 24, 1988, to consider separate applications submitted by
Progress Land Company for the rezoning of 13.53 A to R -1, a
Comprehensive Guide Plan change and a preliminary plat entitled
Country Hollow 2nd Addition. The APC is recommending approval.
For a copy of the Planning and Engineering Department reports on
this item, refer to pages I S through ;5 ( .
For a copy of the Advisory Parks and Recreation Commission
action, refer to page 13 .
For a copy of the APC minutes and action on this item, refer to
page(s)
I J� HO
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the
Comp Guide Plan amendment, rezoning and preliminary plat for
Country Hollow 2nd Addition as stated.
CITY OF EAGAN
SUBJECT: COMPREHENSIVE GUIDE PLAN AMENDMENT
REZONING,
PRELIMINARY PLAT (COUNTRY HOLLOW 2ND ADD)
APPLICANT: PROGRESS LAND CO
LOCATION: SE 1/4 SECTION 23
EXISTING ZONING: AG (AGRICULTURAL)
DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: FEBRUARY 25, 1988
DATE OF REPORT: FEBRUARY 8, 1988
REPORTED BY: PLANNING AND ENGINEERING DEPARTMENTS
APPLICATIONS: Separate applications have been submitted
requesting a Rezoning of 13.53 AG (agricultural) acres to an R -1
(single - family) district and a Preliminary Plat for the Country
Hollow 2nd Addition. This plat consists of 32 lots located north
of County Road 30 and east of Dodd Road and the first addition.
The January 1987 Land Use Plan designates this area as a mixture
of D -II (mixed residential, 0 -6 units /acre) and NB (neighborhood
business). Therefore, an Amendment will be necessary.
EXISTING CONDITIONS /SITE PLAN: This site is surrounded by
unplatted agricultural land on the north and south, the general -
business -zoned Clarkson Place Addition to the east, and the 99
previously platted single- family lots to the west. Scattered
trees are located throughout the site and the area to the south
is open cropland. The site falls dramatically (over 40 feet)
from the Clarkson area to the pond near the northwest portion of
the plat.
The proposed layout ties in well with the previous addition.
Prairie Circle East extends into the western portion of this plat
and Countryside Drive becomes a through street connecting to a
street that will provide access to the unplatted parcels on the
north and south.
The lots vary in size from 12,000 square feet to 33,100 square
feet; the larger ones are due to ponding easements. All lots
meet or exceed the 85 -foot minimum width at the setback
line. No Variances have been requested.
GRADING /DRAINAGE /EROSION CONTROL: The existing topography of the
proposed site generally slopes to a centrally located wetland.
This natural wetland is designated as Pond JP -25 in the
Comprehensive Storm Sewer Plan. The topography of the site rises
from an 817 elevation at the pond's edge to an elevation of 910
on the east and to an elevation 895 on the northerly edge of the
development. The proposed grading plan provides for 2 to 1
slopes along the north and east property lines in the development
which exceed the maximum 3 to 1 standards. Although no grading
is proposed outside the plat boundary, slope easements from
adjacent properties or retaining wall construction is required
to meet the 3 to 1 slope criteria. Acquiring slope easements
from adjacent properties and /or retaining wall construction will
maximize the level areas between the proposed homes and the toe
of slopes.
Drainage within the site is all directed to Pond JP -25. To
provide the required storage in this pond (22.5 acre feet with
1.2 cfs outflow) two berms are proposed in the pond which will
create three separate ponds, each with a different Normal Water
Level and High Water Level. The two southerly ponds are included
in t h i s development w h i l e t h e r e m a i n i n g
pond is located to the northeast, outside the development. The
storm sewer interconnecting each pond must be sized to provide
max=_mum storage volumes. The northeasterly storm sewer which is
proposed to discharge into the southerly pond is required to
discharge directly into the middle pond located in the
northeasterly portion of Block 2. This same storm sewer system
must also be designed to collect direct runoff from the adjacent
property and serve as a future outlet for the upstream drainage
basin.
The slopes adjacent to JP -25 shall be a minimum of 3 to 1. The
outlet for pond JP -25 was intended to discharge into Pond JP -26.3
Pond JP -26.3 is undeveloped and located outside the development
boundaries. The present outlet for pond JP -26.3 is through an
existing storm sewer system within the 1st Addition to Ponds JP-
26.1. and 26.2 which are controlled by a lift station. Because
the proposed development does not incorporate the land in which
pond JP -26.3 is located, the outlet from pond JP -25 must connect
directly to the existing storm sewer system in the 1st Addition.
Presently no overland drainage is proposed between pond JP -25 and
pond JP -26.3.
The current phosphorus export from the 13.5 acre Country Hollow
2nd Addition development is estimated to be 9 pounds per year.
Following the site development, phosphorus export will increase
to approximately 19 pounds per year. Based on the proposed
grading plan, routing all site runoff into Pond JP -25, results in
no additional phosphorus export from the site.
The preliminary Erosion /Sediment Control Plan submitted was
deficient in the following areas: soil stabilization, sediment
basins, cut and fill slopes stabilization, stabilization of
outlets, construction access routes and a contact person should
be specified on the proposed Erosion /Sediment Control Plan in
the event a maintenance problem should arise.
UTILITIES: Sanitarysewer service to serve this development was
constructed in Countryside Drive as a part of the 1st Addition.
A portion of this sewer must be reconstructed to provide adequate
depth for the lots between Pond JP -25 and Pond JP -26.3.
Due to the anticipated future flows from the northeast and south
the section of land along Countryside Drive between the existing
sewer in the 1st Addition and the proposed north /south street
must be 10" in diameter. An 8" line in the proposed north /south
street will be adequate for future flows. As a part of the lst
Addition a 12" trunk sanitary sewer was extended to a point
approximately 85' south of the proposed developments northwest
corner. The existing 12" trunk sanitary sewer line in the 1st
Addition must be extended to the north line of this proposed
development for its future extension to the north.
A 6" diameter water main stub has been provided from the lst
Addition. The looping of the proposed 6" water main will be
required. This proposed development is located in the
intermediate pressure zone. Homes constructed below elevation
860 will require individual pressure reducing valves.
STREETS /ACCESS /CIRCULATION: One access to the proposed
development will be provided from Countryside Drive in the
1st Addition. Two outlets are proposed in the northeasterly and
southeasterly corners of the proposed development which will
eliminate the need for temporary cul -de -sac construction. The
extension of the proposed north /south street right -of -way to its
northerly and southerly boundaries will be required at this time.
Also, the construction of the proposed street to the north and
south property lines will be required. Due to platting of
outlots adjacent to the dead end streets, no temporary cul -de -sac
construction is required.
EASEMENTS /RIGHT -OF -WAY /PERMITS: The development will be required
to provide appropriate street right -of -way, ponding easements,
and utility easements for those public utilities constructed
outside of the proposed public right -of -way. Revisions to the
proposed grading plan may result in slope easement requirements
from adjacent properties.
All regulatory agency permits shall be acquired within the
appropriate time frame as required by the affected agency.
ASSESSMENTS: The parcel proposed for platting shows no record of
any levied assessments and has the following assessments pending
under Project No. 505:
DESCRIPTION RATE QTY AMT
Sanitary Sewer Trunk $1,300 /acre 19.96 acres $25,948
Storm Sewer Trunk .053 /sf 869,456 sf 46,081
TOTAL PENDING ASSESSMENT $72,029
In accordance with special assessment policies in effect at this
time, the following assessment is proposed as a condition of
final plat approval:
PROJ # DESCRIPTION RATE QTY AMT
505 Water Trunk $1,315 /acre 11.09 acres $14,583
TOTAL PROPOSED ASSESSMENT $14,583
All final assessment obligations will be calculated based on the
quantities and dimensions of the final plat and in accordance
with the rates in effect at the time of the final plat approval.
CONDITIONS: COUNTRY HOLLOW 2ND ADDITION
1. These standard conditions of plat approval as adopted by
Council action on September 15, 1987 shall be complied with:
Al, B1, B2, B3, B4, Cl, C2, C5, D1, and El.
2. The storm sewer proposed in the northeasterly portion of the
• site is required to be directed to the pond in the NW corner
of Block 2.
3. Street right -of -way and street construction is required to
the plat boundaries.
A. Assessments
STANDARD CONDITIONS OF PLAT - APPROVAL
1. This development shall accept it additional assessment
obligations as defined in the staff's report in
accordance with the final plat dimensions and the rates
in effect at the time of final plat
B. Easements and Rights -of -Way
1. This development shall dedicate 10' drainage and utility
easements centered over all common lot lines and adjacent
to private property or public right -of -way.
2. This development shall dedicate,.grovide, or financially
guarantee its proportionate share of the acquisition
costs of additional drainage, -ponding, and utility
easements as required by the alignment, depth, and
storage capacity of all requi red'. public utilities and
streets located beyond the boundaries of this plat or
outside of dedicated public right {of -way as necessary to
service this development. ter:
1C
3. This development shall dedicate all public right -of -way
and temporary slope easements for ultimate development of
adjacent roadways as required by the appropriate
jurisdictional agency. = - =r•
4. This development shall dedicate adequate drainage and
ponding easements to incorporate the required high water
elevation necessitated by City storm water storage volume
requirements.
C. Plans and Specifications
1. All publi.: streets and utilities necessary to provide
service t- :his development shall be designed by a
registered , '.)fessional engineer din accordance with City
codes and -agineering standards and policies, and
approved by staff prior to final plat approval.
2. A detailed grading, drainage, erosion, and sediment
control plan must be prepared in accordance with current
City standards and approved by staff prior to final plat
approval.
3. This development shall insure that all temporary dead end
public streets shall have a cul -de -sac constructed in
accordance with City engineering standards.
4. A detailed landscape plan shall be submitted on the
proposed grading plan and approved by staff prior to the
final plat approval. The financial guarantee shall be
included in the Development Contract and not released
until one year after the date of installation.
l��
STANDARD CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL
PAGE TWO
5. All internal public and private streets shall be
constructed within the required right -of -way in
accordance with City design standards.
D. Public Improvements
1 . I f any public improvements are to be installed under a
City contract, the appropriate project must be approved
by Council action prior to final plat approval.
E. Permits
1. This development shall be responsible for the acquisition
of all regulatory agency permits in the time frame
required by the affected agency.
F. Parks Dedication
1. This development shall fulfull its parks dedication
requirements as recommended by the Advisory Parks and
Recreation Commission and approved by Council action.
G. Other
1. All standard platting and zoning conditions shall be
adhered to unless specifically granted a variance by
Council action.
Advisory Planning Commission City Council
Approved: Auc 25, 1987 September 15, 1987
Revised:
LTS #2
STANDARD
)5('
a7 0 ,41
Le ° 1Pi d
\A
)
6 /
.0 7
7 •:;;;
1 3
l i
- N-
- 9
1
COUNTRYSiOE
19493
2
°Riv
s 5 Ole
0
a
m 55 CS" 4
CSAH NO 30 OIFFLEY R0.1
•
••■
ex
4
a
a
1
' /' ' 1 I A ' / I I , i F - / Pi \ \ 1I \ I ' \I I I / / I (( � / ' / / /, _ = \ �,
/ / 1 \ I �' •'6 *7 i \ \` 1, 1(i 1 , ! Il — -' , ' - ; /, / /--.
j . � , � 1
3 ` r/ = iF of / =e-,l % //
/ i'1,;',.'----_,;
'1'1 III e /'. �_ /� _ • y :/L ,1 y � --+ d•, i. •- % ///
— - ',,'Ll i , :3 . /7,—,
�. \• \ -, \.:\ 1 i(I��r / II "i I I(I Irj 1/'
,
J,cy �'' ,•, I, I I r l /
I `� `��`I 1� I� i I / // 4 1.i f I�I I�',I /' + +/ I
_i..._.� -1. Orly -\i',' �/,.!I/r( i L. / II i , , � ,, // /1 / /, ,
- -L :7 ! - ,i ' /li � ��: I� \\
, I ' L 1' \ - I, X 1 1 I 1 , t \ \\` \ \ \,
‘ , ' 1 H I I \\\
\r \� \'
PP IPIE
C''P E
7L - -_ r -x'
"r � \ 7'�
1
L
_
\ I,
aa,•55 00 E
' r,
C S G H .. -h' - -.3S _- (DIFELE� — RO- 1—
'
0
' 50.3/670 .^� • _ ; :. • .
! I W
.J 504/670 :J 384 /560 J Ili
53
1
: / 720 ft \
1 6"
17"
a�Q 119 54 6/71 0 ‘12- s�
77
1® 53.1/680 503/670
12"
.3 7/ 72 0'
53/810
/ 76 0
.w 20 ", OP
31 0 N �'' 6 u 5 58006 STORAGE
I F.�"i��5000 CPU. 800STER
1 ` Z1 H.w 1059
(17 0/82 0 , 1H ` I
355/500 ( , 2 __7 12 ) IH4 6d 7/ 740 Iss
860/9 0 744/820
7401 (206)
1AREI ;- 76.4/81.0
ER 1 ' j,.±p..'I ,1F.
'F_w
•E
city of eagan
PUBLIC
1/74t WORKS
' — DEPARTMEN
1 - �1 (179 a .
_ ` w mom —m —�- era ft..
1 ' 23
:1 514/650
.1 184/290
20"
• { - 2 70 8 /76.0
; 70
•(' !
� 1 I 'l ;i; 456/580
2G1 1, 0201 L IJ
.j •
,�' 1 . . : 1 1 ' . , - . 4A1100p( !0.31 4 3 3 /58 0
--' - 1[ 16 y- 1 sir/ 1 (`' !.' 97 27107_0'1 i. �r �
i � \' ' -- /lL •1p•,';.- - t 199 475/63.0 5 0.6/660 �� ' 412/ ) , t ..t• 1..
WA rui20 I' � 1 - / 1 , i .. , '� t 1� `, ; _;. \I
F
1 •
WATER
MASTER PLAN:
I '.;
te
476 f A!990
.� l0 , -
.SUBJECT PARCEL
490
12"
12"
•7 93 7/1041 •
7 161'.: PIT, • ; I';
d15;a4o; '
x (194 12" '.'1 It (19I)
1!•A 1 0111 7Y'rtls�"Yt><id_791l�.orr v — ..:: w 4.m �/ � .l ----
I,))r
74 6/870
I .
approved
1iy ;,950
Sr a.(\_ PA R �, I c'. -
CD
W
1
mow. wr.rw
205 f• \-) 1 20' a •■ ,i 1 ._ -- - - --
94.7/1000 . ti' t = 1 1 S "' i , /
'1 1 , — / \ �, 1
1
FIG. #3
(
standard
plate -It.:
MEMORANDUM
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
FROM: KEN VRAA, DIRECTOR OF PARKS & RECREATION
DATE: APRIL 12, 1988
SUBJECT: ADVISORY PARKS & RECREATION COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION
COUNTRY HOLLOW - 2ND ADDITION
The Advisory Parks & Recreation Commission met
7th, and reviewed the proposed Country Hollow
After review, the Advisory Commission made the
recommendation:
1.
KV /bls
The plat be subject to a cash dedication requirement.
cc: Marilyn Wucherpfemmig
Planning Aide
3r
on Thursday, April
- 2nd Addition.
following
March 24, 1988
14. All pathways shall be constructed to standards acceptable
for passage of emergency vehicles.
All voted yes.
COUNTRY HOLLOW 2ND ADDITION - COMPREHENSIVE GUIDE PLAN AMENDMENT
REZONING AND PRELIMINARY PLAT
The second public hearing of the evening was convened by Mr.
Pawlenty in regard to the applications of Progress Land Company
requesting a rezoning of 13.53 AG (Agricultural) acres to R -1
(Single Family) district and a preliminary plat for the Country
Hollow 2nd Addition. Mr. Sturm described the plat consisting of 32
lots located north of County Road #30 and east of Dodd Road and the
First Addition. The January 1987 Land Use Plan designated the area
as a mixture of D -II (Mixed Residential, 0 -6 units /acre) and N.B.
(Neighborhood Business). He then described the steeply sloped
parcel surrounded by unplatted Agricultural land on the north and
south, the General Business zoned Clarkson Place to the east and the
99 previously platted single family lots to the west. He noted that
staff had recommended that roads be stubbed for future access rather
than left as outlots. All lots did meet minimum code requirements.
Mr. Warren Isrealson of Progress Land Company was present to
respond to questions. Mr. Foertsch advised member Voracek that the
outlots should remain outlots because the stub streets were not
accessable to maintenance crews. Mr. Voracek also questioned the
2:1 slopes which Mr. Foertsch said would be addressed in. the
approved drainage and grading plan. He also advised that standard
condition B -4 includes all ponding requirements.
Member Wilkins asked Mr. Isrealson if as a developer he had
tried to acquire the Gordon property. She also questioned whether a
stub street would be stub into the N.B. area. Mr. Sturm suggested
that the street might end up being N.B. on the east and R -2 on the
west. It was noted that due to the large slope from the Clarkson
property, a retaining wall would be necessary if slope easements
could not be obtained.
Mr. Foertsch noted that staff does require retaining walls if
3:1 slope cannot be maintained pursuant to standard condition C -2.
Mr. Merkley suggested and engineer Foertsch agreed that the
extension of the 12 foot sanitary sewer trunk to the north of the
property line from the previous addition should be made an
additional condition.
Voracek moved, Merkley seconded the motion to recommend approval
of the Comprehensive Guide Amendment of 13.53 acres AG
(Agricultural) to R -I. All voted yes.
ritL, .ili1UL 5
March 24, 1988
Voracek moved, Wilkins seconded the motion to recommend approval
of the rezoning from AG (Agricultural) to R -1 (Single Family)
district. All voted aye.
Voracek moved, Wilkins seconded the motion to recommend approval
of the preliminary plat, subject to the following conditions:
1. This development shall accept its additional assessment
obligations as defined in the staff's report in accordance with the
final plat dimensions and the rates in effect at the time of final
plat approval.
2. This development shall dedicate 10 foot drainage and utility
easements centered over all common lot lines and adjacent to private
property or public right -of -way.
3. This development shall dedicate, provide, or financially
guarantee its proportionate share of the acquisition costs of
additional drainage, ponding, and utility easements as required by
the alignment, depth, and storage capacity of all required public
utilities and streets located beyond the boundaries of this plat or
outside of dedicated public right -of -way as necessary to service
this development.
4. This development shall dedicate all public right -of -way and
temporary slope easements for ultimate development of adjacent
roadways as required by the appropriate jurisdictional agency.
5. This development shall dedicate adequate drainage and
ponding easements to incorporate the required high water elevation
necessitated by City storm water storage volume requirements.
6. All public streets and utilities necessary to provide
service to this development shall be designed by a registered
professional engineer in accordance with City codes and engineering
standards and policies, and approved by staff prior to final plat
approval.
7. A detailed grading, drainage, erosion, and sediment control
plan must be prepared in accordance with current City standards and
approved by staff prior to final plat approval.
8. All internal public and private streets shall be constructed
within the required right -of -way in accordance with City design
standards.
9. If any public improvements are to be installed under a City
contract, the appropriate project must be approved by Council action
prior to final plat approval.
5
1dLCi: z.1, 1988
10. This development shall be responsible for the acquisition
of all regulatory agency permits in the time frame required by the
affected agency.
11. The storm sewer proposed in the northeasterly portion of
the site is required to be directed to the pond in the northwest
corner of Block 2.
12. Street right -of -way and street construction is required to
the plat boundaries.
13. Retaining walls or slope easements from neighboring
properties shall be required so that minimum 3:1 slopes are
maintained in all areas of the plat.
14. The 12 inch trunk .sanitary sewer in the First Addition
shall be extended to the northerly boundary of the property.
All voted yes.
BRIDLE RIDGE 2ND ADDITION - REZONING, PRELIMINARY PLAT & VARIANCE
Cha`ir..man Pawlenty then convened the public hearing in regard to
the appl c aions of Sienna Corporation for the rezoning of 166.9 AG
(Agricultural) cres to R -1 (Planned Development) district and a
preliminary plat or the Bridle Ridge 2nd Addition. Mr.Sturm
described the prop6s,a1 consisting of 251 single family lots located
west of the First Addi on, east of Lexington' Square Additions,
abutting Wescott Road to e north.
The proposed variance is or two cul -de -sacs in excess of 500
feet. The proposal is in conformance with the City's most recent
land use plan and the lots in accoi' :'with City Code requirements.
R -1 -PD zoning was being requestedz only to be consistent with the
First Addition. It was noted that park dedication had been
completed with First Addition.;'
The most significant feature of the development was Bald Lake, a
general development water: All lots would inlet shoreland zoning
requirements along Bald/Lake. The development would proceed in four
phases, first consisting of 154 lots, the seconcIN9f 31 lots, the
third of 54 lots, and the fourth of the balance including the Hall
property.
Mr. Sturm oted that the applicant had worked closely with the
staff and , hat the conditions in the report should be changed
somewhat jc5 show that the existing home would change its address
when the/third phase of development occurred. He also indicated
that ;horses could be allowed on the Hall property as being over 5
acre9 such time as the last phase was commenced.
I`o
Agenda Information Memo
April 19, 1988, City Council Meeting
REZONING, PRELIMINARY PLAT AND VARIANCE
BRIDLE RIDGE 2ND ADDITION
I. Rezoning for Bridle Ridge 2nd Addition /Sienna Corporation of
166 Acres to a PD R -1, Preliminary Plat Containing 251 Lots and a
Variance for a Cul -De -Sac in Excess of 500 Feet - -A public hearing
was held by the APC at their March 24, 1988 meeting, to consider
separate applications for the rezoning of 166 acres of A to R -1
PD and a preliminary plat for Bridle Ridge 2nd Addition. The
variance is for two cul -de -sacs in excess of 500 feet. The APC
is recommending approval of these applications.
For a copy of the Planning and Engineering Department reports,
refer to pages l t;L through /S .
For a copy of the Advisory Parks and Recreation Commission
action, refer to page s ((,0 k lc,l
For a copy of the APC minutes reflecting their March 24 action,
refer to page(s)/i.2_-/.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the
Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment, Rezoning and Preliminary Plat
for Bridle Ridge 2nd Addition.
APPLICATIONS
EXISTING CONDITIONS
SITE PLAN /CODE CONFORMANCE
CITY OF EAGAN
SUBJECT: REZONING , PRELIMINARY PLAT, VARIANCE
(BRIDLE RIDGE 2ND ADDITION)
APPLICANT: SIENNA CORPORATION
LOCATION: N 1/2 SECT 23
EXISTING ZONING: AG (AGRICULTURAL)
DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: MARCH 24, 1988
DATE OF REPORT: MARCH 15, 1988
REPORTED BY: PLANNING & ENGINEERING DEPARTMENTS
Separate applications have been submitted requesting a rezoning of 166.9 AG
(agricultural) acres to an R -1 Planned Development district and a preliminary
plat for the Bridle Ridge 2nd Addition. This proposal is for 251 single
family lots located west of the 1st Addition, east of the Lexington Square
Additions abutting Wescott Road on the north. The variance is for two cul -de-
sacs in excess of 500'. This proposal is in conformance with the City's most
recent Land Use Plan.
An Environmental Assessment Worksheet is being prepared for this project since
more than 150 lots are being platted. The previous EAW for the Bridle Ridge
1st Addition and the Stonebridge Addition did not include this area.
This site is rolling and contains numerous knolls, ridges and depressions.
Bald Lake, containing approximately ten acres, is the most dominant physical
feature in the area. is considered a general development lake within the
City's Shoreland Ordira- : ?. Building setbacks must be a minimum 50' from the
ordinary high water mar . )HWM) and the lots must be at least 75' wide at that
point. The site is he =_iy wooded, especially in the area between Bald Lake
and the pond to the rth. This area is extremely well suited for upper
bracket housing. The rest of the site has scattered trees and open grassland.
The P.D. (R -1) zoning is proposed in order to be consistent with the previous
addition even though all lots meet R - code requirements. Also, the overall
parks dedication for the 1st Addition included the Hall property. Cash, as
well as land for the Bridle Ridge neighborhood park, was provided. The only
pending dedication requirements are on the NW 91.57 acres of the property.
This site is served primarily by four access points from Wescott Road that
line up with existing curb cuts on the north side of the road - including
Woodlands Elementary School. Three connections are made to Northview Park
Road on the south. A trail will be constructed on the west side of the
north /south road near the western property line. The applicant worked closely
with staff throughout the design process and thus most concerns have been
resolved. The lots vary in size from 12,000 sq. ft. to 93,300 sq. ft. for the
one that contains the Hall homesite. Most are in the 14,000 - 18,000 sq. ft.
range.
The project will be constructed in four phases.
Phase 1 with 154 lots is the area on the west and south. Phase 2 (31 lots) is
near the center of the plat bordering Bald Lake on the east. Phase 3 (54
lots) is near the NE portion of the site and Phase 4 (12 lots) is immediately
east of Bald Lake. It contains the Hall home mere horses are currently kept.
As a condition of approval, staff is recommending that the horses be allowed
until that phase develops since the area is over seven acres in size.
GRADING /DRAINAGE /EROSION CONTROL: Extensive site grading is
required to achieve the lot density proposed by this Development.
The proposed grading severly impacts existing site topography.
Backyard slopes and slopes along roadways are required to adhere
to the City's maximum allowable 3 to 1 slope criteria. The
proposed slopes which are greater than the maximum 3 to 1 allowed
will require construction of retaining walls or establishment of
non- maintenance vegetation. Slope easements are required for
grading proposed outside the boundaries of this development.
Appropriate measures are required to insure that the proposed
site developments has no adverse impact on the existing homes in
the Lexington Square Additions and Bridle Ridge Addition. The
existing drainage patterns established in the Lexington Square
Addition and Bridle Ridge Addition shall be maintained and not
altered.
Street H where it connects to Northview Park Road at its easterly
end is required to be constructed at an elevation that will
provide overland drainage from the low point in Northview Park
Road to Pond JP -21. The high point in the overland drainage
route shall be no greater than elevation 853. Street H at its
westerly connection to Northview Park Road is required to be
opposite the driven centerline of Braddock Trail and not the
platted centerline. The driven centerline of Braddock Trail is
approximately 4 feet westerly of the platted centerline.
Drainage within the site is directed to Ponds JP -58, JP -19, JP -20
and JP -21 in the Bridle Ridge 2nd Addition and JP -30 in the
Lexington Square Addition. All of the aforementioned ponds are
designated ponding areas in the City of Eagan's Comprehensive
Storm Sewer Plan. The proposed storm sewer in the northerly end
of Street P at Wescott Road cannot discharge directly into the
trunk storm sewer at Wescott Road as proposed. The drainage area
tributary to the storm sewer, including the intersection of
Streets R and P, T•ist discharge directly into Pond JP -30 in the
Lexington Square Ai "_tion. This drainage area was originally
anticipated to di. _=irge into Pond JP -30. The existing storm
sewer outlet and cent grading adjacent to Pond JP -30 in
Lexington Square Ad•._=ion must be reviewed to insure the required
storage and outflow sates have been provided for.
The outlet for Pond JP -58 is required as a part of this site
development. The following design considerations are given for
the ponding areas affected by site development:
,4
POND # DIRECT AREA STORAGE VOL. NWL HWL OUTFLOW
(ACRES) (ACRE FEET) (CFS)
JP -19 35 37.9 874.4 882.8 7.4
JP -20 39.5 38.7 852.7 855.6 1.0
JP -20A 42.9 4.7 865.6 873.0 9.0
JP -208 20.9 1.2 877.0 882.0 4.0
JP -21 223.3 105.6 815.5 840.5 6.3
JP -30 51.9 10.8 873.0 882.0 1.0
JP -58 9.5 1.6 877.5 879.0 0.5
Drainage from Outlots E and G is intended to be provided by
overland drainage to Street N and Pond JP -58 respectively. The
Developer is required to insure positive drainage is provided or
a storm sewer system is required. The grading plan provides for
regrading the westerly side of Pond JP -21. The proposed filling
of Pond JP -21 raises the HWL approximately 0.5 feet. The
proposed rise in the HWL in Pond JP -21 has no adverse impact on
the proposed building pad elevations adjacent to the Pond.
Proposed storm sewers in the south intersection of Street P and
Street N and the intersection of Street M and Street I are
required to be designed based on a 100 year design. This 100 year
design storm is required because no overland drainage route is
being provided at these intersections.
A preliminary Erosion and Sediment Control Plan was submitted for
review as a part of this application. A number of concerns are
addressed in the attached letter from the Dakota County Soil and
Water Conservation District.
UTILITIES: Sanit:: sewer of adequate capacity and depth to
serve this Devel 'nt is provided from the existing sewers in
the Bridle Ridge . _:ition /Northview Park Road, and Lexington
Square Addition. drainage areas tributary to each of these
sewers in consis =e::t with the previous estimates identified in
the Comprehensive :sanitary Sewer Plan.
Water main service of sufficient capacity and pressure is
provided by a 16" trunk water main in Northview Park Road and a
12" trunk water main in Wescott Road. The details of the
proposed internal water main system are subject to further
review.
STREETS /ACCESS /CIRCULATION: The street access to the site is
provided from the Lexington Square Addition to the west, the
Bridle Ridge Addition to the east, Wescott Road on the north and
Northview Park Road on the south. The north /south street
connecting Northview Park Road and Wescott Road (designated as P
on the grading plan) is designated as a Municipal State Aid
Street in the City of Eagan. Its horizontal and vertical
alignment shall conform to Municipal State Aid Standards. All
proposed local streets are required to conform to City standards
for horizontal and vertical alignment. The connection of
proposed Street B to Wescott Road is required to be consistent
with a City approved design as proposed in the Woodlands
Development on the north side of Wescott Road.
EASEMENTS /RIGHT -OF- WAY /PERMITS: Slope easements will be required
from the adjacent properties where the proposed grading exceeds
the boundaries of the Development. The Development is required
to provide appropriate public utility and ponding easements as
required by the City Comprehensive Plans.
Street P is required to have an 80' wide right -of -way. The
proposed right -of -way widths for the remaining internal streets
are in accordance with City Code Requirements. The Development
is required to provide a 40' half right -of -way for Northview Park
Road. Sufficient right -of -way for Wescott Road is proposed.
The proposed filling of Pond JP -19 will require a permit from the
Department of Natural Resources. All regulatory agency permits
shall be acquired within the appropriate time frame as required
by the affected agencies.
PROJ # DESCRIPTION
ASSESSMENTS: A portion of the parcels proposed for platting into
the Bridle Ridge 2nd Addition have been levied sanitary sewer
trunk and storm sewer trunk assessments under Project 433.
City records show assessments pending under Project #'s 498, 491,
494, 485, 479, and -58. These Project #'s identify assessments
for lateral benefit om sanitary sewer, storm sewer and water
main, trunk area ges for sanitary sewer, storm sewer and
water main and st__ assessments.for..Northview Park Road and
Wescott Road. The -amount' of _these pending assessments is
approximately $1,019,700. The following assessments are proposed
in accordance with special assessment policies in effect at this
time as a condition of final plat approval:
RATE QUANTITY AMOUNT
491 Storm Sewer Trunk .053 /sf 404,240 $ 21,425
494/498 Lateral Benefit
Trunk Storm Sewer $20.83/ff 188,000 $ 39,327
TOTAL PROPOSED ASSESSMENTS $ 60,752
All final assessment obligations will be calculated based on the
quantities and dimensions of the final plat and in accordance
with the rates in effect at the time of the final plat approval.
MINNESOTA
SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION CIS DISTRICTS
Marcn 2, 1933
To:
From:
DAKOTA COUNTY SOIL AND WATER -
CONSERVATION DISTRICT
Mike Foertsch
City of Eagan
Lynn ChaIzoian and John :'.ante^
Dakota County ShCD
Pe: Bridle Ridge 2nd Addition Erosion Control Review
Soil and Water Resources
Soil Resources
The soils ?resent on this site pose limitations for
develonment. 'here are pockets of soils with high water
tables and much of the site's natural sloges are treater
than 18%.
Farmington Professional Building
P.O. Box 129
821 Third Street
Farmington, MN 55024
Phone: (612) 463 -8626
The soils that have a water table witnin 5 feet, are located
throughout the site in low areas. These areas are typically
shown as :storm water detention areas or outlots, but some
houses and streets are r_lanned where the soil survey shows
soils with high rater table. In particular the northwest
corner, southwes- zorner, east of JP -19 and east of a
bonding area in 'ck 2 may be affected.
1. A geot= ?cal firm should take soil samples to
determine soil _problems exist and what corrective
action is n-- 72ssary where building foundations or roads
are propose:.:.
The soils with a slope greater than 18% are located to the
east, west and north of 3ald Lake. The soil series present
are Kingsley sandy loam (342E) and Mahto:nedi loamy sand
(454F) . These areas will require rapid re-establishment of
the vegetation and minimum disturbance of these steep
slopes. The proposed phasing of this development will aice
in controlling erosion from these steeo coarse textured soil
areas, but a more effective approach would be to minimize
disturbance by less intense development. Cul -de -sacs could
be shortened or eliminated to reduce aisruotion of these
slopes and create a more controlled d`veloaient elan.
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER
rater l.esources
The two Hain water resource issues which need to be
addressed regarding Bridle Ridge 2nd Addition are the dater
quality i pacts of site development on JP-2, Bald Lake and
JP -4, Fish Lake. ^oth of these lakes have been designated
as Class I :aaterbocies in tne Pro•,osea Eagan :inter Quality
anage.nent Plan. The water c:dal i ty i.-oacts on these
:aterbociies was estimated using models developed by ;'William
'Walker, Jr. and Kenneth U. :'_eckhow.
JP-2J is located in the center of the Bridle Ridge 2nd
Ad. site. The Lake currently has a ':aatersned area of
S4.1 acres, ^cost of wnich is being used as casture. The
:.rorosed development will increase the waters:led to 79
acres. The estimated 'J'.losonorus loading changes are as
fellows:
W atershed area
runoff coefficient
Phos hhorus loading
Pre - development
'".1 ac.
0.1r,
4 3 pounds/ year
In addition, 0ald Lake will receive runoff from 13 acres of
the Sagan High School site.
Runoff from the south 51 acres of tne 3ald Lake :watershed
flows through detention ponds in Outlot D and Outlot :i :prior
to discharging tc the Lake. The 13 acres of the Bign School
site also drains through the detention Pond in Outlot V.
Increasing the Outlot 0 and Outlot Ponds to provide 1.2
and 4.3 acre feet of wet pond storage respectively will
reduce phosohorus loading from this subwatershed to
approximately pro - development levels. It appears that both
areas are adequa? for the construction of these sized
ponds. In fact, - e proposed configuration of the Outlot '1
pond, eq. long : narrow, with the inlet and outlet at
opposite ends, real for phosphorus removal.
The construction the ponds, however, will not prevent the
phosohorus loadi :.; to Bald Lake from increasing because the
22 acre watershed north east of and imnediately adjacent to
the lake will discharge directly into JP -20. Phosphorus
runoff from this area and the quantity discnarged form the
Outlot M pond will increase the loading to JP-20 by
approximately 13 founds /year.
\L-k%
Post - development
79.4 ac.
...22
1 hounds /yar
Since no data on the current :water euality and Physical
characteristics of Bal :; Lake exists, the impact of the
enosohorus loading increase is difficult to assess. 3ecause
ure- development onosoihorus loading was estimated at 43
lbs /year and post - development loading 56 /1'hs /"ear, a 23%
increase, a significant increase in the a1 =,ae growth in the
lace is antici•?ated. aowever, because an cutlet will be
constructed for :3ald Lake, some of this :phosphorus will be
flushed tnrougn the lake and not become available for plant
growth. The Reckhow model predicts an increase of
approximately 15% in the algae growth.
The amount of nnos>>horus exported from the sito was
estimated because of the concern for the water duality of
Tisn Lake. In the ore- development condition, aooroxi13tely
130 pounds of phosphorus oer near are generate~ on-site.
However, because JP -2:; has no outlet, and because of uptake
in JP -21, JP -58 and JP -19, less than 42 lbs /year of
onosnnorus are released from the site. Following: site
.eveloonent, aDoroxi mately 132 lbs /year will Pe discharge
from the site. This amount can be significantly reduced by
increasing the :wet detention volume in JP -21 and JP-I9
because the majority of site drainage will pass tnrouga
these Lhonds prior to being discharged downstream.
Preliminary modeling indicates that a wet pond volume of 10
acre feet in JP -21 will reduce phosphorus loading to JP -19
by approximately 40 lbs /year. Similarly, increasing the 'wet
pond volume of JP -19 from its current 1:J acre feet will
reduce phosphorus export by 21 lbs /year.
The amount of this phosphorus reaching Fish Lake is
dependant on the phosphorus removal efficiency of downstream
ponds. Although this analysis has not yet aeen done, it can
be assumed that some of the additional phosphorus exoorted
from the site will reach Fish Lake and adversely i: enact the
water quality.
1. ;let por. Mention basins on the site should be
maximized t event the.degradation of Bald and Fish
Lake. The .:rease in the wet detention volume of JP-
19, JP -21 an the pond in Outlot M are especially
critical in _:aintaining lake water quality.
Erosion and Sediment Control Plan Review
The following General Criteria have not been adecuately
addressed in the preliminary plan.
GC -3 Protection of Adjacent Properties.
All points where storm water is directed off -site, into pond
areas or outlots need to be provided with an appropriate
oerimeter control measure.
CC -5 Sediment 9asin Requirements.
Temporary sediment basins may be required during the phases
of grading. Temporary basins are required if the drainage
area for a discharge point is greater than 5 acres in size.
Cut and Fill slope grading and stabilization.
This site contains :many steep and long fill slopes. Seeding
these slopes quickly after rough grading will be required.
Erosion control matting should be used on steer slopes where
straw mulch cannot be mechanically anchored.
Some of the fill slopes are proposed below the water
elevation of storm water ponding areas. These slopes will
be a problem to stabilize because the fill may be under
water for several hours or days. The plan should address
how this issue can be resolved.
CC -9 Stormsewer inlet protection requirements.
Stormsewer inlet filters may be required after the utilities
are constructed. The proposed design of inlet filters and
the catch basins to be protected should be on the plan.
CC -11 t'orking in or crossing a watercourse.
If construction work is going to venture into the water of
the storm water ponds on this site, then a floatable silt
curtain needs to be used. This practice reduces sediment
transport into the ponds during the filling procedure.
GC -11 Underground Utility Construction.
Areas disturbed by utility construction need to he seeded
and mulched. This needs to be specified on the plan.
GC -12 Construction Access Routes.
Construction routes need to be located on the plan and a
drawing shown that details the design to be used.
A so
Conclusions
We reconmend that the preliminary '.plat be approved, but that
a revised erosion control -plan be aPnroved and adequate
nutrient detention basins be designed before a grading
.permit is granted or final )tat approval.
cc: Sienna Corporation
James dill Inc.
CONDITIONS: BRIDLE RIDGE 2ND ADDITION
1. These standard conditions of plat approval as adopted by
Council action on September 15, 1987 shall be complied with:
Al, Bl, B2, B3, B4, Cl, C2, C5, D1, and El.
2. All Shoreline Ordinance lot requirements shall be adhered to.
3. Horses shall be allowed on the H property until the final phase
of development occurs.-
4. The EAW process shall .be completed and approved prior to the final
plat submission.
5. The existing home ahall change its address when the 4th phase of
development occurs. ,__
6. The Hall homesite shall connect_,to City water and sewer when the
4th phase of development occurs:
7. A revised grading; - erosion /sedent control plan addressing
the soil resource, water quality and erosion /sediment
control concerns identified in the attached memo from Dakota
Canty Soil & Water:Conservation.District is required for
review and approval' by staff` prior to grading permit
issuance or final plat approval.
8. No alteration of the existing and previously identified
drainage patterns in Bridle Aidge and Lexington Square
Additions will be allowed.
9. The appropriate emergency ovr drainage routes are
required.
10. Proposed storm sewers the 'snu'th intersection of Street P
and Street N and the intersection of Street M and Street I
are required to be designed base4 on a 100 -year design.
11. The developmen_ is required t o` incorporate, but is not
limited to, t :etail street;_ utility, and ponding design
requirements a: :entified in the staff report.
1
r
A. Assessments
1. This development shall accept its additional assessment
obligations as defined in the staff's report in
accordance with the final plat dimensions and the rates
in effect at the time of final plat approval.
B. Easements and Rights -of -Way
1. This development shall dedicate 10' drainage and utility
easements centered over all common lot lines and adjacent
to private property or public right -of -way.
2. This development shall dedicate, provide, or financially
guarantee its proportionate share of the acquisition
costs of additional drainage, ponding, and utility
easements as required by the alignment, depth, and
storage capacity of all required public utilities and
streets located beyond the boundaries of this plat or
outside of dedicated public right -of -way as necessary to
service this development.
3. This development shall dedicate all public right -of -way
and temporary slope easements for ultimate development of
adjacent roadways as required by the appropriate
jurisdictional agency.
4. This development shall dedicate adequate drainage and
ponding easements to incorporate the required high water
elevation necessitated by City storm water storage volume
requirements.
C. Plans and Specifications
1. All public
service tc
registered _
codes and
approved by
STANDARD CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL
:Teets and utilities necessary to provide
:is development shall be designed by a
-2ssional engineer in accordance with City
ineering standards and policies, and
=off prior to final plat approval.
2. A detailed , rading, drainage, erosion, and sediment
control plan rust be prepared in accordance with current
City standards and approved by staff prior to final plat
approval.
3. This development shall insure that all temporary dead end
public streets shall have a cul -de -sac constructed in
accordance with City engineering standards.
4. A detailed landscape plan shall be submitted on the
proposed grading plan and approved by staff prior to the
final plat approval. The financial guarantee shall be
included in the Development Contract and not released
until one year after the date of installation.
STANDARD CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL
PAGE TWO
5. All internal public and private streets shall be
constructed within the required right -of -way in
accordance with City design standards.
D. Public Improvements
1. If any public improvements are to be installed under a
City contract, the appropriate project must be approved
by Council action prior to final plat approval.
E. Permits
1. This development shall be responsible for the acquisition
of all regulatory agency permits in the time frame
required by the affected agency.
F. Parks Dedication
1. This development shall fulfull its parks dedication
requirements as recommended by the Advisory Parks and
Recreation Commission and approved by Council action.
G. Other
1. All standard platting and zoning conditions shall be
adhered to unless specifically granted a variance by
Council action.
LT S ,r 2
STANDARD
Advisory Planning Commission City Council
Approved: Auau 3, 1987 September 15, 1987
Revised:
I lie
/ 1
L4:',
err.,
• ''_ f
,•• ,
-
•
_ •
\
7
8
2.C..0- ••••
*0 •
,
, • . • : . . ,_
m '.
,, i , 7 ,z' , .; • , ' (/) . C :
7 . , . / -
\ ; \ , ..::
'.. t r .• - ' ° ' m : r , i
, •
''
,...1
' ; :
j. - ; ... ''' ' i '.- ='' ("' -: '''., i ", ' . ■ -
' . /--.,,..‘■ ., ,- ' = ' = ' - _
i ..\ ,, ,,,,, --,../ -, , / 4-'- -, - , , ; : i - '.•,‘ r.,..... , 1 i '; \ ' .‘
1, , .' 1 I •
-- I
• I I - ,I '
-'----•-,-,-- • 1
\ 7 / I -
- ( / / -
' i '
- '% '.- . • , •
. ,
i 1 :.....„-------- ..- --- - ( '‘ -‘ i
....-..------ - - -
, ., • ._- - : 1
..----- - 1 . — ■ —..— —
% ) . .i • - - 2 ' . - 7 -- '-, ),
_Z__ __ _ - " / •••., : 1. .. pi . I .., I ,, ._ ...0 '' , -■.' ' ' \! ' .a / ' r. / . z, (I) ' . : 1 ,. ,', •
/ i f . 'L. ,.. z "-• C ' i M, 6 - r - ,,,, : •' II
; , -../ \,' -' ; 1: •., : I ' 4 ,
• ' .■ - ,
fi r. k - ( i , ..:' ( :' — ±_; L.. _I .'" 1 ,..... i ,a L •,.. L LL_ -,..,-; ' _1_ s' ..',''''
- V.a.. r i - I 1 i N'' ! ".. I . I.• 1 ,,-; I . ,;.' .4
••, ..., ( 1 .- a 1
I - — — , ''' 1 • I •',:".: i 4 ; I a a 7, f z ., j , i , 0
' • ' ..".. '
, . i ,, •:,....5
11 i I, i; / i , ' ,.,, r ' I ' 1 - i ■ 1
.,.
k -- \ •„ ,, ..., ,, I •■
..„c . \ \ .:n i i - -- , ', I - \ ' 1 I '
1111
• 1 - .,.
.,
` * —I i I !
\ '
L." s
1 •:: -, -
,''
/ 0-. . 74 . ....
.1. .g 1;•.- 99
it 11 - -
'i H :i , k
:f
i h 7:
\
\\ =, \/
• \ /
;
;
m
1
TTI
m
0
rn
7 7 -„ _ I.
. • \
71 I •-•
a
• /,
SIENNA CORPORATION
4940 0101440 00100 SUITE 109
4110/ 95431
BRIDLE RIDGE 2ND ADDITION--
1/40.491, L404.
PRELIMINARY PLAT
PHASING PLAN
HF
r - - -
jai nes Hil I, inc.
PLANNERS / ENGINEERS /SURVEYORS
z
\
-- ,,,,A ■ .,
_. • • 1 . i . 'i2" 'i .);'-? .-.■ -;■.: - .:• '' '1
- n •
1 k!. • • .. ., i ;-„....., ... , , ,, , , , ...
-'''' • ' '-• "I''' ' ' I ' • ''---.., f.i,-. u ' .,.._ ,t1 ,,.._
../.......:_ r . .,,,. r_ - , -..,;....:"..- . . -.,. . ....., - ...,. , •.4....i. ,
,?-,, N -1' . '' ^'
, „ , ,,,,„ 1 _:_,....- i %,11 1 " ' - • '.• - .2, , . '
v tfiP v
,,,/ '-••L' ' ,1. • ''^- ' .,,';.") t'''..z.•;- t. : , 7---•- ) - f ' , ' . t- - •,..t ,- ), "1 ' .-=';-.:::= ,'-'--`1Y '-"‘"-')` ' , , ,, •, 1
- .,, - .--' -,-- :.'` . ..41, / ; :''' i .T,':',,I /•: .. :,.:`:'.."-;=•‘-: - ,`:-, 1 - ----(...:?.. _...-,..,:::-.1,-F---,1,,,E--::',1-11:4,C1.-:::'—'‘,.":••,-;,,',:!;.....:--:-:.:::::,,:sl.; '2‘,":„•''-:',-:-i.''',: i ', I,
,,„...-- , , ::' , t . • :, : , ,, ,k ;', :.t ."'S '‘ i" ‘'') e:,1 ,_ _. : t j --., , 0 , ■,4 C___,, ,_ , ,,,,,- . ?"; .,...), ,,,,', '',".. r ,: :*1. 1 - ,, - ;'.4 -• -■ ,,..■•,:',.. <'./ =''''-' \-a :" '.' 1 :
\ \ ‘ - '••'•' • 1 - c." --''‘ • --°: i kt 1 :' , ::' , J.,-- 7 ' -;:---.■,.„): .;` ', \ •',''' I s: ' 1 \ ,i''.=..7,r,k ' 1.' ) i ' :-.,.:,-(..-::' ''..". '
■,, f... / ,: /-; . ,,,,, ;•/,0• ', , ';,/ - /.,„1 ' "•-•,-; ,A.;',. a4 4 lk ,- 9:.: .- cc •- • -
fi , r , , ,„,„ 1,4 , , „ .. , .,,,,,,,.„.„,,.....,.._. ,,,___, ,,>;...`,4-.1 \f .-- ,--., 4' i % /;^*1- . 7' ; ' '' ''''' ' ':'-ii .... 1 ,' C' , : .k i 42.•'
'''', / ', ),,. ' ,',I ' a • •:, a ' . .)' 1 '-1 - 7At i„ '-'", •'., I: ''.?- - - A ' , '1," ' ' '‘ -- a' • ‘ ^ , ,..1 , Y , '; i -, '• ' '‘. - k i ' .$ '...._,'"',..-- ''',. '-'`. - ...7r 1 •:.''... '' ' ' ;'"t 4 - • ., ' . :''''i ., / ''... ; t a :1 "' ... --", :
..1 lb ■ .‘ '...,- ,,,,,,e , ,
, ,,.. , ''. , t.,\ , 0 A f. s - r , ...:",,' , ,,,,.. I'l:t '.... ":. •'. ,- '7 ';
\\ /. ' /" i k's ''-i'Zi : ' ': \'''-'''', •■•••;r:' t, ; 1; ; ; 1 4 . ; "-)'- ' ' ' .'•,,',. ,..'ic,.''':.', , .':,,,;-,. / :;1,") . i,,k . :-,.. ,-._ ‘ :. :
.: '.: :: :, ,L,..,, -1't , -,'' -.--• :: -,.., 1..... ;:. i 17- :::,:.: t -
' i,. > - L,)'...i" ' '.'1' ; ',' - '' '1 ' : ■ - ..':=1 *
''. f- :.,";t-,... =- ,.tt ▪ ',= '" .i:,E- . / 1 ,' 'il'''''''■,' / ' Is: ' ''...'‘‘-'•‘'-'0-./ .'j l__ 4„
,._ -. -, '",- ' - ')" ''',--:' .._ •-•.- •-•'' - -;-' ) -, ' ...'' '.. 4•'-'.: -.,,Al.,-,..,, ...,r,'" ' • ,. :i - :•4'.... ,*- -
..., / ,-- - - - - ,._-,,....._--' _ --- - ..-, -, , , , r .'' ."t 0 , -i ...x„,",, 4 y ,C - __?---,..- ■.-. ,--` ...,17 A.:,,i -.-^"-'' • -•:::i 1. , IS' - . ; C‘- . 1 `.
,,,,,,,- . ,,,,--. • ,;,' ? , ,,,, .,_ _ — -, —. -- --- —_-------::-_- • - ------ --,,,' - - ,- .- - ' ' , ...,....-, e ' '`j,' . .i..,:. 1 ' ,....■• , r - v .., .
Y.'1, 'r''''0- —-:-._- : - .' ,',-,=-:----: , 7 - ;' ' :7■ ,r- l'' 5 ;3 % :'•I' •I ..10:1'..1..ili',4irt-,';‘‘;''4„4;;7:7'..7A;" :‘ 1 - c'
' . •
'• -■,,' - r‘ e - '.; . 1 :::A2 : . / 1 ' ,,:-.? - : 7 :, /';,' , ''' ' '': - - '..-' i' ' ' - ' '',,,- . 1 n'.'fr,c,;fri .4-,• ' .,-', .
I ,
..,k , .. , :c .•'?,".,.' ' ' -.• • --a-
'`•'---• '‘' • , • 1 t• 1 ' . 1' 0,.. ,,• ,
. ■ I - / •y -2 '.>" - t .. - ' ' -- ' ' '
'''-ar--.- ' '..,,'"-^; :',' -*a '. ' i • , ' L '":a‘ \ \ ,, 1 i ii\ .1 -';'' . -. . - -- 1 . i
''',•,17.1,._..e.,,,.,, ....-„:,,,..„.........,7„.„.;4„:„,ii-,_., . tA , ,, ,, ,.., -, , ,,, - i .
,k4. ,,,', ..:„.., ../1 ,,,, ,,,, - ,.. - , , ,, i *- \ \ o \;k t ‘ I ,' • :."'',;', '' L it ' l'i t :` 1- t ,` , \ 1 , ' ' ' , I 1 ' l', , .1.,
,f, ' ,4 :1 , -1,---,,,.t,‘,,. , ,ir:', , : \._ _V: - i . :=":', -,' C ) : '.:: : ': . '
s's:s--: '/ •4•• '4(:.- ' -
- --- ". ''' ', ' - •,-, ) i, ; ci c• : ‘' ,•: - - 1,..----, ," - 1 :1:I . ;■ ,7 1 I , ....... f •.....1 ,,,_4. .1 ■ , I . ■ O , ; -
;* i
\-;---'' ''`--'-' ` '\ • c4 \ \ 1 C • • - • ,' i rli'll e... i‘ - ', l• . /. , , - , ..- -1- , , ' ' I !, ‘, \ •■ I
'-.-;-'7. "- >
-( _. _ ,,._il ,, 1‘;' - ■ :', \'`I \
.....;.L.-.-"c --- -•",,-' , :," -,,, // ,,,:/ / t„..,- . :7 , -, i f ,-,, .....„\..---1— ,) ‘..)_(.,.,:- , i J:, c ,:: ‘:•:,,,, :s:. - '• , ( \
...4:-7--- ,../' , }, •:.i ;,...< 4 ' 1....,-. \--,----_..../ - ::: k :--'--'.: ' N v''' '''... 1
‘, , t • 1
-. ;ri- , '' . ) 1 .:? N'• 1 c, , ,, 1, !
i _,....,,s_, : __
. , .
...., - --
• .' a l. ' 11 , , V•'-■' ,
1 1 ; i 1 q2.,1, 'IL_
: .,,,:,,,,,„"' I r•
, I
." .•'.- ..._. 1 .,
,„•.1 k C t ! i l
, N■C -
.'
/ .' /
1
I 1 1 1 11 t I til ilt
11III i'..
' II 1 1‘ 1 I t .• 1 11 1
1
!,A. 1 illtIt
,
u '■ st ' Il
il\ .' , - -
,
1 . - I ,,, •,„,
iit,1 1 1-) 1, 1'
ik z , ‘1
SIENNA CORPORATION
*040 vixima univt tluill SOO
uo•nEAPOLIS. 1. 60.
PRELIMINAR
GRADING 1. EROSION CONTROL PLAN
- - 1
9
' '-' t . li lo ••
1111:1;711:Co,..',=4'x, .1 • • i
1 I tv: XI 'il 1 i 16 ;1 1 1
-1 t 1 1 !'- 1 0 , l': •
• I • •
i 11 I: , -* t'''. III •-• ..1
1 •
1 E'll " .1; i •; .t •1 i',
• '- 1 . k •
+,1 1, •
; .. 1 ,
, 4 t! i li. •
,, -.I 3* , a l"; It i' 91
. al 1 , I it it Oi
1 .1 " a
I ' '
lanles R.1111, oc,
PLItte4U,S tr.coNtlitS t 5iitt
1
r-
>
—3
rn
co
m
- n
-
cn
0
m
•
—4 r'11111,1111r::1
■il!,.
c
Z 1 . 1 , 1 . 1 :11;;1 1
4
' I
I
\
•
• .1
' i t\ .'\ c" ; \■.• ...,' '. 1 :R i ; '-,!- i 1 \ 1' . 1 . "7- : \$ • ''
a, -
,..„,,/ 1 i ,..., 1 , r 1 _.•\,,,,. i .• , ,...„ _
I t • ' 3 •••,---':--- '\•-.--••-'-"/, i 1 t 7 11
.i )/
• 1 " . . ' a , -'1 7.. \ . -s-.:4
t '_,_„", ' `: .- , I . • I ' . / •r- •11
L a ,,
.t.i?- ' ■ t _2„---
1 '''' • e \ -- " "* T - --. '-/ 1 \
-4 ---• '• j * / 57, ' r.; ,..- , , i
..,--- • ' -"C" rri - -^°- --P : i.,---...
\ . 1 .., t ."-- 7 ' ..1 I •01
. • ('-', 1 4 \ ‘ \:.... \:....,' ,...'\‘, 1 itu_
--7 0
___ 4 3 ''; _--, , ` -• ,‘ 1 3 \_..,..■ I R I ; ....I
'\ i ( , ''''. • .
• ., ,, , l it, P•;',ALR 2 ....,,
•
( i • • , , --__,,„ 4 _______
1 t r, f i . ; -- 7) . .,r
7 .%';',---■--__._..____._ 1 :-..,' , ' 1 '',".' 7 ‘.. 71
-,;-: ■/// i i -----"<"-,..; -
I ;
, . ■ ) I: i
s . /
'',., I i . r" t P • ! , i 7 7
11
; i /f/: , 1 - ---•4 i Loo: 1 . 7 i ; .. - ‹.. -- J•,,„___C ; ____--_--1__ 1
'.`k '°'- -D .1 i i 1 1
P •
"c 2 1 i • '..!‘••:' t; \ 1 I I 4 . 1 1
i% m \ V. / > '
.1 -
/ I. 13
,
I •
■.--,
.. - hi
4
o
, I
)- ' - 71 - • 1. • 1 '- -
• 1
\ i .4'4 •• : !
4/ ,/,?\ 6 i/ 1 )_. __ j \ I L_i r . " r, __::..
A . ,,, pk \..,
R \ _,- ,
....-., /
--' ,____ .i ift, 17,:-...,...t...1 '71....7.a-k•'\::?'. i ' i i=1, ..-4 _-'i ' ) Fli --;.---- : .-
•
I 1
( - 5 ‘ ■ ti .. `^--...A \ , .7, • 6' I 1
\ .....1- -.- I. _ _••••
1. \ \ ‘ ...).— ---° I., ,. .. 4 -- ., \' ......-!"--+ .:..:•o•z.i E 7" 7 . _... p , •1 r _---
\ \ /%5 ---------*- '-C " r - -- f i - 7 C
..A" " \-- /
,. t•V/t4/ I .
...._ ,, , .... LzsL I. , \ - r
A • ' ,,''''-) A
A ' ' - r.
1 1 --1.-
LP.r... -•-- -,______,
II1R
11
I
11
• R • -
!1• • • • P.
,...........„....... \ 1 1
.1.
. r
'•..
< 7 N R\
•L. t,.-
.,...--\. .„1, s ‘. ,-..„...! :
N 'R . '" ' !..'7—..•■ s . 1.7,-.!r..7!'s`
H , • , •, , ,, ,,,... i .:.;,:i.: : :,.//,:,-.,. : . , -.77:-.T..:: 1 , ' — 7 ?
;4..:-1: i A
''.:\ ' f: :):. • • •
>
21
SIENNA CORPORATION
•.40 name OPITO 1 ROO
11, 1114.
aptaLe moos IMO ADDITION
RAO., 141,............."
PRELIMINARY PLAT A
PHASING PLAN
• —
0
I ■71
K
r -
I .
- •
•
------.. 1 ,,,
.....--71. r i •
; //
• P:piR. \--,-,•.-:-
. V ,
i
, $ --.....„! .3, 3 , ! , ..x.; : ;::_L-i::::..:::...:.
l 1--- ..__: t , 1- :.::: . • 1 5::::-7.:::•)'-...... ) -- ....-:0 r---,---
\ .\. --•.,r---,
v 1 -'_ 1
i .
\ ". • - i lc I W ; WI ; )1 ..:1..1 ,
x 1
r 1 1 •
-
,
i 1 - - : -- • i ,, _, .
i . t '%,,• j
.. .._,
1
1 1 g .
f
.,.. - , -•
_1 ■ C , 4 -i 4
I ‘`• 1 : , V
,..
1 i
James R. NI, inc.
PLANNERS / ENGINEERS /SURVEYORS
2
P -46
'93.5
s •,/_ �/ 8 7 3 0
879.4
JP
926.0
945.0
a
yr a ./
87; ' 0 (Y 88 2
2 ice, Y,. - L.S. -15
rt 880.1p
J N
JP -32 -�
86/15 I JP -31
eili ,.)" I , 876.3 '
880.4
- 4
. 1 _
. N ,
J -hy " - 21
zl J-m
J-L.
JP - 34I\� �J
884.0 1
891.9
city of eagan
' PUBLIC
CA WORKS
" ^ DEPARTMENT
JP-58
877.5
8822
J- t
'JP - 28
956.0
969.4
JP -5:
964..
97/.7
JP -
852 0
855.6
1 t l ' sTATIc .
826.0.
s . 853.0 r,
JP -39.'
884.0
.0 MCC'. 11
`- ")c.°//
J -o %
JP - A L.S.-17
JP
8 1 5.3 f ' ° \
840.0 XXX ag \
\
,, �\
V "
JP-53 JP -22 •
\ 840 0 � '�� °,
864 0
\'t3., , / \
,i 11/4
\ I` L.S. -18
JP "JP - 26
896.0 .0 J ) ' ; 806.0
904.0 / 824.0
/.,
1
L P 32
879.0
884.3
J -
z 30• --
f" I. F. .I
/tDD1 '1 ryl r� � I
I niv 1 1 '�
;3'1(
'Ii.._t I 4,4 ""'" , y_Ll..i_i t);
r I P -4R
n
0 JP -52
8 62.0
878.0
JP -68
STORM SEINER
MASTER PLAN
JP-I8
8 60
87/.0
JP 23
852.2
8574
JP - 25
817.0
824.0
SUBJECT PARCEL
J-y
F
approved:
standard
plate 4:
GP-4
883.00
8874
IG *-I
TO:
MEMORANDUM
THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
ROM: KEN VRAA, DIRECTOR OF PARKS & RECREATION
DATE: APRIL 12, 1988
SUBJECT: BRIDLE RIDGE - 2ND ADDITION
The Advisory Parks & Recreation Commission reviewed the proposed
Bridle Ridge, 2nd Addition, at the April 7th, Advisory Commission
meeting. Mr. Rick Packer, representing Sienna Corporation, was
present at the meeting to discuss with the Advisory Commission
the plat and certain parks dedication conditions. The Advisory
Commission discussed the proposed park dedication for the
greenway between Northview Park Road and Bald Lake. The
Commission agreed to accept this property; however, there was a
question as to the value due to the steep slopes and partial
ponding area.
The Advisory Commission also discussed a proposed dedication of
Bald Lake, and a trailway within parkland area #3, which was
partially dedicated with Bridle Ridge - 1st Addition.
The Advisory Commission also reviewed a request by the developer
to reallocate an equivalent portion of parkland dedication in the
proposed Bridle Ridge - 2nd Addition, to the Hall property. A
portion of the Hall property had fulfilled its parkland
obligation within the Bridle Ridge - 1st Addition, but it has not
been platted. After the review, the Advisory Commission made the
following recommendations:
1. The developer receive a partial park dedication credit for
the greenway between Northview Park Road and Bald Lake as
follows:
* *25% credit based on all land above the high water
level of the pond.
* *100% credit for all land with less than 12% slopes.
2. 8 Ft. Wide bituminous trail link be constructed on the north
side of Northview Park Road - from the Bald Lake /Northview
greenway to the intersection at Braddock Trail.
3. The plat or grading be revised to provide additional width
above the high water level for a trail connection within the
Bald Lake /Northview Road greenway and within Park #3.
4. The developer receive no parkland dedication credit for the
Bald Lake dedication located below the normal water level.
All lots abutting Bald Lake be platted to the normal water
level. The developer receive 25% credit for the .65 acre
dedication of shoreland.
5. The developer provide a park cash dedication contribution on
the remaining lots.
6. Subject to legal review by the City Attorney's office, the
developer be provided the opportunity to transfer a park
dedication credit for a portion of the Bridle Ridge - 1st
Addition, considered the Hall property, towards this plat.
7. Also, for the Hall property to be subject to a future cash
dedication, and
8. The Hall property, Sienna Corporation, and the City have a
binding agreement to this effect, if it is approved.
KV /bls
cc: Marilyn Wucherpfennig, Planning Aide
Ed Kirscht, Engineering Technician
iii
t - �1'l, :.LUUCm5
March 24, 1988
10. This development shall be responsible for the acquisition
of all regulatory agency permits in the time frame required by the
affected agency.
11. The storm sewer proposed in the northeasterly portion of
the site is required to be directed to the pond in the northwest
corner of Block 2.
12. Street right -of -way and street construction is required to
the plat boundaries.
13. Retaining walls or slope easements from neighboring
properties shall be required so that minimum 3:1 slopes are
maintained in all areas of the plat.
14. The 12 inch trunk sanitary sewer in the First Addition
shall be extended to the northerly boundary of the property.
All voted yes.
BRIDLE RIDGE 2ND ADDITION - REZONING, PRELIMINARY PLAT & VARIANCE
Chairman Pawlenty then convened the public hearing in regard to
the applications of Sienna Corporation for the rezoning of 166.9 AG
(Agricultural) acres to R -1 (Planned Development) district and a
preliminary plat for the Bridle Ridge 2nd Addition. Mr.Sturm
described the proposal consisting of 251 single family lots located
west of the First Addition, east of Lexington Square Additions,
abutting Wescott Road to the north.
The proposed variance is for two cul -de -sacs in excess of 500
feet. The proposal is in conformance with the City's most recent
land use plan and the lots in accord with City Code requirements.
R -1 -PD zoning was being requested only to be consistent with the
First Addition. It was noted that park dedication had been
completed with First Addition.
The most significant feature of the development was Bald Lake, a
general development water. All lots would meet shoreland zoning
requirements along Bald Lake. The development would proceed in four
phases, first consisting of 154 lots, the second of 31 lots, the
third of 54 lots, and the fourth of the balance including the Hall
property.
Mr. Sturm noted that the applicant had worked closely with the
staff and that the conditions in the report should be changed
somewhat to show that the existing home would change its address
when the third phase of development occurred. He also indicated
that horses could be allowed on the Hall property as being over 5
acres until such time as the last phase was commenced.
APC Minutes
March 24, 1988
Mr. Mike Black from James R. Hill was present as well as Rick
Packer of Sienna. Mr. Black indicted that Army Corps of Engineers
permit and DNR permit had been approved. The DNR was concerned with
encroachment of the Bald Lake wetland along the northern side.
Therefore, the developer was only to move the road farther to the
north.
Mr. Bill Smith, 931 Savannah, indicated concern in regard to
drainage from the school and this site. Mr. Merkley questioned
whether action was required in regard to the variances. Mr. Sturm
indicated that public hearings were not required for variances and
that the plat as approved, would include rights -of -way resulting in
variances.
Mr. Foertsch indicated that the storm sewer requirements
provided that no drainage shall be allowed towards the Lexington
Square Additions. Mr. Voracek questioned the "bubble" corners and
asked whether they should be removed. Mr. Foertsch indicated that
the northerly one appeared acceptable as a center island could be
provided creating less of an impact on maintenance crews. He also
indicated that the bubble had a 65 foot radius.
Member Trygg questioned whether the soil and water conservation
district concerns had been addressed. Mr. Foertsch indicated that
staff had met with the developer and the SWCD that afternoon and
that after additional information was provided, SWCD was in
agreement with the Hickock & Associates' evaluation of phosphorus
export. The result was that there would be no increase due to the
development as a result of on -site ponding and treatment.
Member Trygg questioned adequacies of soil which Mr. Foertsch
said would be checked and corrected by the applicant. He noted that
roads were, inspected . by the City as constructed.
Mr. Merkley questioned the 2:1 slopes where non - eroding
plantings would be used. Mr. Foertsch advised that the developer
had included special provisions for non - maintenance vegetative
cover. In this situation, 2:1 slopes were acceptable. However,
erosion control plans would be carefully scrutinized.
Member Wilkins questioned the number of builders that would be
used in this development. Mr. Packer indicated that there would
probably be about 5 builders that might be different from the
builders in the First Addition as the lot costs were much higher,
tending to require more expensive homes.
Wilkins moved, Trygg seconded the motion to recommend approval
of the rezoning to R -1 -PD. All voted in favor.
Wilkins moved, Voracek seconded the motion to recommend approval
of the preliminary plat, subject to the following conditions:
L 7- 5
2
March 24, 1988
1. This development shall accept its additional assessment
obligations as defined in the staff's report in accordance with the
final plat dimensions and the rates in effect at the time of final
plat approval.
2. This development shall dedicate 10 foot drainage and utility
easements centered over all common lot lines and adjacent to private
property or public right -of -way.
3. This development shall dedicate, provide, or financially
guarantee its proportionate share of the acquisition costs of
additional drainage, ponding, and utility easements as required by
the alignment, depth, and storage capacity of all required public
utilities and streets located beyond the boundaries of this plat or
outside of dedicated public right -of -way as necessary to service
this development.
4. This development shall dedicate all public right -of -way and
temporary slope easements for ultimate development of adjacent
roadways as required by the appropriate jurisdictional agency.
5. This development shall dedicate adequate drainage and
ponding easements to incorporate the required high water elevation
necessitated by City storm water storage volume requirements.
6. All public streets and utilities necessary to provide
service to this development shall be designed by a registered
professional engineer in accordance with City codes and engineering
standards and policies, and approved by staff prior to final plat
approval.
7. A detailed grading, drainage, erosion, and sediment control
plan must be prepared in accordance with current City standards and
approved by staff prior to final plat approval.
8. All internal public and private streets shall be constructed
within the required right -of -way in accordance with City design
standards.
to.
9. If any public improvements are to be installed under a City
contract, the appropriate project must be approved by Council action
prior to final plat approval.
10. This development shall be responsible for the acquisition
of all regulatory agency permits in the time frame required by the
affected agency.
11. All Shoreland Ordinance lot requirements shall be adhered
ftl :iinuceS
March 24, 1988
12. Horses shall be allowed on the Hall property until the
final phase of development occurs.
13. The EAW process shall be completed and approved prior to
the final plat submission.
14. The existing home shall change its address when the 3rd
phase of development occurs.
15. The Hall homesite shall connect to City water and sewer
when the 4th phase of development occurs.
16. A revised grading, erosion /sediment control plan addressing
the soil resource, water quality and erosion /sediment control
concerns identified in the attached memo from Dakota County Soil and
Water Conservation District is required for review and approval by
staff prior to grading permit issuance or final plat approval.
17. No alteration of the existing and previously identified
drainage patterns in Bridle Ridge and Lexington Square Additions
will be allowed.
18. The appropriate emergency overland drainage routes are
required.
19. Proposed storm sewers in the south intersection of Street P
and Street N and the intersection of Street M and Street I are
required to be designed based on a 100 -year design.
20. The development is required to incorporate, but is not
limited to, the detail street, utility, and ponding design
requirements as identified in the staff report.
_ _ 21.. -.All points where .. storm water is directed off - site, _into
pond areas or outlots need to be provided with an appropriate
perimeter control measure.
22. Temporary sediment basins may be required during the phases
of grading. Temporary basins are required if the drainage area for
a discharge point is greater than 5 acres in size.
23. This site contains many steep and long fill slopes.
Seeding these slopes quickly after rough grading will be required.
Erosion control matting should be used on steep slopes where straw
mulch cannot be mechanically anchored. Some of the fill slopes are
proposed below the water elevation of storm water ponding areas.
These slopes will be a problem to stabilize because the fill may be
under water for several hours or days. The plan should address how
this issue can be resolved.
9
ins
Aec.: :iinuces
March 24, 1988
24. Storm sewer inlet filters may be required after the
utilities are constructed. The proposed design of inlet filters and
the catch basins to be protected should be on the plan.
25. If construction work is going to venture into the water of
the storm water ponds on this site, then a floatable silt curtain
needs to be used. This practice reduces sediment transport into the
ponds during the filling procedure.
26. Areas disturbed by utility construction need to be seeded
and mulched. This needs to be specified on the plan.
27. Construction routes need to be located on the plan and a
drawing shown that details the design to be used.
All voted affirmatively.
STRATFORD OAKS ADDITION - PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AMENDMENT
REZONING AND PRELIMINARY PLAT
Chairman_ Pawlenty opened the next public hearing of the evening
in regard ' the applications of D. H. Gustafson and Ken Applebaum
requesting a rezoning of 1.9 R -2 acres within the Thomas Lake
Heights Addition \to a planned development district and an amendment
to the Eagan 4'PD to include that land for a total of 328 rental
apartment units. Mr °.Sturm introduced the project including the 1.9
acres previously owned byMeritor Development. He noted that the
Eagan 40 PUD was approv in 1975 with an extension in 1986
providing for 338 units.
The Deerfield preliminary plat had not moved ahead and the road
being proposed was consistent with theme PUD. He noted that the road
had been shifted slightly to the north whchwas a benefit to the
property owners to the south, by moving the apartments further from
their back yards. He noted that the building be somewhat
similar to the Forest Ridge : buildings, although - 't2f a different
exterior. There were two buildings that would be on1y,60 feet from
the centerline of the proposed through- street, rather than 80 as
required by City Code. A' private street would be conducted from
Diffley Road to the east -west street.
Mr. Dan Gustafson, the developer and landscape architect,
advised that he had developed approximately 350 apartments and 25G
single family homes in Eagan since 1972. He described a 100 foot
elevation difference within the bounds of the property and indicated
a plan to save as much existing vegetation as possible, particularly
along the property to the south.
Agenda Information Memo
April 19, 1988, City Council Meeting
REZONING AND PD AMENDMENT /STRATFORD OAKS ADDITION
J. Rezoning of Stratford Oaks Addition /D.H. Gustafson and Ken
Applebaum, of an R -2 to a Planned Development District and an
Amendment to the Eagan 40 PD to Include Property for an Apartment
Unit Complex - -A public hearing was held on March 24, 1988 by the
Advisory Planning Commission to consider a rezoning application
of 1.9 acres of R -2 within the Thomas Lake Heights Addition to a
Planned Development district and amendment to the Eagan 40 PD to
include land for a total of 328 rental apartment units. The
Advisory Planning Commission is recommending approval.
For additional information on this item, refer to the Planning
and Engineering Department report, a copy is enclosed on pages
n. �1 through I ` LI .
Enclosed on page ) 3 O is a copy of the Advisory Parks and
Recreation action.
For a copy of the APC action on this item, refer to pages
_ through
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the
rezoning and planned development district amendment to the Eagan
40 PD and the preliminary plat entitled Stratford Oaks Addition.
CITY OF EAGAN
SUBJECT: PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AMENDMENT, REZONING, PRELIMINARY
PLAT (STRATFORD OAKS ADDITION)
APPLICANT: D.H. GUSTAFSON /K. APPELBAUM
LOCATION: N 1/2 SECTION 28
EXISTING ZONING: PLANNED DEVELOPMENT
DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: MARCH 24, 1988
DATE OF REPORT: MARCH 15, 1988
REPORTED BY: PLANNING & ENGINEERING DEPARTMENTS
APPLICATIONS: Separate applications have been submitted requesting a rezoning
of 1.9 R -2 acres within the Thomas Lake Heights Addition to a planned
development district and an amendment to the Eagan 40 P.D. to include that
land for a total of 328 rental apartment units. This site is located along
the south side of Diffley Road west of Thomas Lake Road. The entire plat does
contain the 2.2 acres on the east side of Thomas Lake Road that is in the
process of being sold to New Horizon Homes for Phase 2 of the Boulder Ridge
townhouse project adjacent to Heine Pond.
This proposal is in conformance with the City's most recent Land Use Plan. An
Environmental Assessment Worksheet is in the process of being prepared for
this site since the 1.9 acres from the Thomas Lake Heights Addition was not
included in the EAW that received a negative declaration in 1986 with the
previously approved, but never finalized, Deerfield Apartment Project.
EXISTING CONDITIONS: The Eagan 40 P.D. containing 39.6 acres and 338 total
units was approved in 1975 for a ten year period. In May of 1986, action was
taken to extend the P.D. agreement for a three year period. At that time, the
Deerfield Addition was also approved for 322 apartment units on the west side
of Thomas Lake Road an:: the 2.2 acres on the east side were to have no more
than 16 housing units.
The 322 units previou: 2 approved on the west side of Thomas Lake Road on 32.2
acres had a density J. units /acre. This proposal for 328 units on 34.2
acres has a density of -.5 units /acre.
The site is surroundea by the Boulder Ridge townhouse proposal and quad homes
to the east, quad homes to the south and undeveloped RB and R -4 zoned land to
the west. The original P.D. Concept Plan showed an east -west connection road
from Thomas Lake Road to Johnny Cake Road. This plan is consistent with that
plan although the road has been shifted slightly to the north to lessen the
grading impact. The 100' wide Williams Brothers pipeline easement bisects
this site in a south to northeast manner. The topography is primarily rolling
grassland that generally flows toward a ponding area near the center of the
site. A deep, wooded ravine enters that area from the west. The southeast
property line is also rather heavily wooded and little grading is proposed in
that area. Other immature tree stands are found scattered throughout the
site.
(STRATFORD OAKS ADDITION)
GUSTAFSON /APPELBAUM
MARCH 24, 1988
PAGE TWO
SITE PLAN: The developer proposes to build this project in two phases; the
northeast portion would be constructed in the northwest portion would be
constructed in the Summer and Fall of 1988 with a February 1989 opening and
the remaining units to be built in 1989. A June, 1990 project completion is
anticipated.
These buildings are similar in scale and design to the Forest Ridge apartments
along Denmark Avenue only these will be painted and partially bricked. Also,
the exterior parking stalls will not be directly behind the garage doors since
this has created parking problems with people parking in front of another
persons garage at Forest Ridge. Code requires that one covered parking stall
be provided with the rent for 1:1 interior /exterior parking ratio. This has
been satisfied with 440 exterior spaces.
All building and parking setbacks meet code requirements except for some
buildings /parking on the south side of the east -west connection road. The
buildings must be a minimum of 80' from the center line of the street and the
parking 50' from that point also. Currently the buildings vary from 60' to
80'. Either a variance can be granted to allow the proposal as is or the
buildings will have to be shifted to the south. The design attempt was to
keep the buildings as far to the north as possible to lessen the impact on the
quad homes to the south. That building setback is 30' and the closest the
buildings are to that line is 60' -100'. All other R -4 requirements have been
adhered to.
The buildings will have grey pigmented siding with a cream trim similar to the
applicants Parkside Apartments that are currently under construction on the
old dog pound site along Lexington Avenue, just south of Yankee Doodle Road.
The proposed landscaping works well conceptually. More evergreens along the
southern property line (especially around the tennis courts) will add
screening to the south. The submitted sections show the evergreens and over
story trees at a fairly mature size.
AMENITIES PROPOSED: Central air, self defrosting refrigerators, built -in
microwaves, washer /dry hookups in each unit, private attached garages for
75% of the units, outdco- pool, two tennis courts, volleyball court, a hard
surfaced game court, - '_ , j and club house that includes an exercise room,
party room /kitchen, 1(,f tub and sauna. Twenty additional covered parking
stalls have also been crovided for rental use. The 328 unit max will consist
of:
16 efficiencies at 450 s.f.
16 efficiencies at 525 s.f.
96 1- bedroom /1 bath at 780 s.f.
14 1- bedroom /1 bath at 790 s.f.
36 1- bedroom /1 bath /den at 850 s.f.
136 2- bedroom /2 baths at 960 s.f.
14 2- bedroom /1 bath (handicapped accessible) at 960 s.f.
9('\
GRADING /DRAINAGE /EROSION CONTROL: The proposed site has
elevation differentials ranging from a high point of
approximately 984 in the southwest corner of the site to low
point elevation of approximately 897 in the center. Cuts and
fill areas from 10 to 20 feet are required to accomplish the
proposed building pad elevations.
Proposed slopes which exceed the maximum allowable 3 to 1
criteria are proposed to be covered with a nonmaintenance ground
cover type vegetation.
The Development is required to provide onsite ponding to handle
the storm water runoff generated by the Development. All site
generated runoff is required to be directed to the proposed
centrally located ponding area prior to discharge into the
existing storm sewer system in Thomas Lake Road. Quantitative as
well as qualitative ponding requirements are to be taken into
consideration in determining the appropriate pond design. The
proposed pond will be limited to a 1 CFS outflow rate. All
inlets into the ponding area are required to be extended to a
determined normal water level. The storm water runoff generated
from the building sites is required to be directed to the parking
areas of the site and then in turn conveyed to the centrally
located ponding area by or through an internal storm sewer
system. Direction of the building generated runoff into the
internal storm sewer system minimizes the impact the Development
will have on the adjacent properties.
A Preliminary Erosion and Sediment Control Plan was submitted for
review as a part of this application. Attached are comments from
the Dakota County Soil and Water Conservation District addressing
soil resource, water resource, and erosion and sediment control
concerns.
UTILITIES: Water main service of sufficient capacity and
pressure to serve the Development is readily available from the
existing 12" trunk water mains located in Diffley Road and Thomas
sake Road. The proposed internal water main system is required
to be looped as necessary to provide the adequate fire demand
requirements.
Sanitary sewer service is not readily available to serve this
Development. The Development will need to extend sanitary sewer
service from the existing service available at the intersection
of Thomas Lake Road and Clemson Drive. The Development proposes
to adequately provide sanitary sewer service through an internal
system. The proposed internal sanitary sewer system in the north
central portion of this site needs to be revised. In this area
the Development proposes a 19'deep sanitary sewer only 10' feet
from the, proposed buildings.
The Development will be required to extend an 8" water main to
the westerly property line for future connection to the existing
16" trunk water main in the future extension of Johnny Cake Ridge
Road.
n o
STREETS /ACCESS /CIRCULATION: The Development proposes to take
street access from Diffley Road on the north and Thomas Lake Road
on the east through the construction of an east /west public
street which would ultimately connect Thomas Lake Road to future
the extension of Johnny Cake Ridge Road. The Development is
proposing to construct a private street from Diffley Road to the
proposed east /west public street.
EASEMENTS /RIGHT -OF- WAY /PERMITS: The Development is proposing
adequate half right -of -way for Diffley Road. The Development
will be responsible for dedicating a 60' right -of -way for the
proposed east /west public street which connects Thomas Lake Road
to the future extension of Johnny Cake Ridge Road. Dakota County
will be requiring restrictive access dedication along Diffley
Road except in one location. Adequate right -of -way for Thomas
Lake Road has previously been provided for.
The Development will be required to provide appropriate street
right -of -way, bonding easements, and utility easements for those
public utilities constructed outside of the public right -of -way.
The grading plan indicates slope easement requirements from
adjacent properties.
All regulatory agency permits shall be acquired within the
appropriate time frame as required by the affected agency.
ASSESSMENTS: The underlying parcels of the proposed Development
have previously been assessed for sanitary sewer trunk, water
trunk, strom sewer trunk and Thomas Lake Road.
City records show no pending assessments of record and the
following assessments are proposed as a condition of final plat
approval in accordance with special assessment policies in effect
at this time:
PROJ # DESCRIPTION
86
Future
Future
237
237
257
Lateral Benefit Water
Main
Trailway
Diffley Road
Lateral Benefit Water
Upgrade
Thomas Lake Road
Upgrade
Storm Sewer Trunk
TOTAL PROPOSED ASSESSMENT
RATE QUANTITY AMOUNT
$21.60 /ff 827.42 $17,872
$13.00 /ff 2,042.00 $26,545
$90.20 /ff 902.42 $81,398
$ 8.50 /ff 1,064.52 $ 9,048
$42.15/ff 360.01 $15,174
$ .07 /sf 1,484,753.00 $103,933
$253,970
All final assessment obligations will be calculated based on the
quantites and dimensions of the final plat and in accordance with
the rates in effect at the time of the final plat approval.
" arch 3, 1935
Soil Resources
;later Resources
MINNESOTA
SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICTS
TO: Yike roertscn
City of Eagan
L'RO`;: Lynn C;iakoian and John Barten
Dakota County S,.:C')
::E: Stratford Oaks Erosion Control Plan Review.
Soil and Water Resources
:..ire are. soils present on this site that pose limitations
for development. The areas at lower elevations are composed
of soils with water tables present witnin five feet of the
surface. The series represented are )uam silt loam (344)
and Kennebec silt loam variant (1316).
1) Soil borings by a yeotechnical firm should focus
on determining if these soils are present where
roads or building foundations are planned and
— what' corrective action is required.
Other soils ores - - have slopes greater than 18%. The soil
series Present le steep around the pond is a
Kingsley= Mahtore complex (896E,F) . These soils are sandy
loam and loamy s textures and highly erodible. Every
-effort should be . age to leave the vegetation on
these slopes or _o re- establish vegetation immediately after
rough grading if slopes .rust be disturbed.
The Stratford Oaks development is in the Blacknawk Lake
?iatershed. Runoff from the site flows through five ponds
prior to discharging into Blackhawk Lake. Development of
the site will increase the phosphorus runoff from 20
lbs/vear to 70 lbs /year. The `,calker model indicates that if
all of the additional phosphorus generated by development
were to leave the site, loading to Blackhawk lake would
increase by 43 lbs /year.
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER
kna_
DAKOTA COUNTY SOIL AND WATER
CONSERVATION DISTRICT
Farmington Professional Building
P.O. Box 129
821 Third Street
Farmington, MN 55024
Phone: (612) 463 -8626
The proposed elan divides the Stratford Oaks site into four
subwatersheds. Runoff from 3.2 acres flows into a pond
adjacent to County Road #30, runoff from 16.32 acres flows
into a pond at the center of the site, 5.06 acres flows
east to catch basins alonj Thomas Lake Road and the
remainder of the site flows cnto adjacent property. Each of
the su.watersneds were modeled seoarately to determine
:phosphorus export from the site if the or000sed oonas were
utilized as nutrient detention basins. The :walker :model
estimates that ahosonorus export from the areas draining
into the north oond and the central pond can be reduced oy
aooroximately 65%. This would reduce the amount of
phosohorus leaving the site to 42.2 pounds, a reduction of
33 pounds. However, this would still increase the loading
to B1acr:ha`ik Lake be a Porox imateiv 25 lbs/year. Further
analysis indicates that post - development ohosohorus export
can be reduced to ore-development levels if the following
conditions are met:
1. Tae suo.;atersned draining to Thomas La::e Road is
routed into tne center pond;
2. The north pond adjacent to County Road 430 is
outletted into the center pond;
3. The north pond is modified to have a wet detention
volume of aporoxi;mately 2 acre feet;
4. The watershed draining into the north pond is
maximized;
5. The center pond is ,modified to have a wet oond
volume of approximately 13 acre feet;
6. The ponds are designed according to tne Wacker
model.
The elevations existing on the site suggest that the above
conditions can be met with only minor changes in the grading
plan. If the changes are made, the phosphorus export from
the site will be reduced to 20 lbs/year, the same as the
ore - development amount.
Erosion and Sediment Control Plan Review
The following General Criteria were not addressed in the
preliminary Gracing, Drainage and Erosion Control Plan.
CC -3 Protection of adjacent aro3erties.
Several areas that have story, eater drainage directed off-
site will renuire more than a silt fence as oerir.eter
control.
More details need to be provided about the retaining walls
;proposed tzrouanout the site. Timing of retaining wall
construction also snoula be addressed.
CC -4 and CC -5 Sediment basin reouirements and tieing of
installation.
Sediment basin specifications need to be provided on the
plan and preliminary construction schedules that reflect
when trapping measure will be installed.
CC -7 Storrnwater management to control erosion
The plan does not specify how storirwater will outlet from
the stormwater pond along Diffley Poad. If this enters a
Glitch outlet system the adec,uacy of the conveyance system
needs to be analyzed.
CC -10 Working in waterbodies
If filling or other construction activity ventures below the
water level in a bond, then a floatable silt curtain needs
to be used and specified on the plan.
CC -12 Construction access routes
All anticipated ingress and egress points should be shown on
the plan.
CC -13 and CC -14 Disposition and maintenance of erosion
control practices.
A contact person needs to identified on the plan who will
handle erosion control questions. Mote 41Ci on the plan
indicates home builders will be responsible during the
building phase. Since this is not in keeping with Eagan's
guidelines, the note should be removed from the plan.
Conclusions
:e reco :mend the ?reli : inary plat be acnrcved, but that e
revised erosion and seliT,ent control olan be submitted
before a grading oer ~it is granted or final blot a:)uroval.
cc: _<en Apolebaum and ;an Gustafson
Probe Engineering, Inc.
CONDITIONS: STRATFORD OAKS
1. These standard conditions of plat approval as adopted by
Council action on September 15, 1987 shall be complied with:
Al, Bl, B2, B3, B4, Cl, C2, C3, C5, D1, El, Fl, and G1.
2. The developer shall make each potential renter aware of the
Williams Brothers pipeline easement.
3. One covered parking stall shall be included with the rest.
4. A negative declaration on the EAW shall be determined prior to
the final plat submission.
5. All trash shall be contained in each unit until the day of pickup.
6. All site generated runoff is required to be directed to the
proposed centrally located ponding area prior to discharge
into the public storm sewer system.
7. All roof top runoff from the proposed buildings along the
edges of the Development is required to be routed to the
proposed centrally located ponding area.
8. Proper water main looping and extension to the westerly
adjacent property is required.
9. The detail design for the centrally located ponding area is
required to address both quantitative as well as qualitative
requirements and limited to a 1 CFS outflow rate.
1')(0
A. Assessments
1. This development shall accept its additional assessment
obligations as defined in the staff's report in
accordance with the final plat dimensions and the rates
in effect at the time of final plat approval.
B. Easements and Rights -of -Way
1. This development shall dedicate 10' drainage and utility
easements centered over all common lot lines and adjacent
to private property or public right -of -way.
2. This development shall dedicate, provide, or financially
guarantee its proportionate share of the acquisition
costs of additional drainage, ponding, and utility
easements as required by the alignment, depth, and
storage capacity of all required public utilities and
streets located beyond the boundaries of this plat or
outside of dedicated public right -of -way as necessary to
service this development.
3. This development shall dedicate all public right -of -way
and temporary slope easements for ultimate development of
adjacent roadways as required by the appropriate
jurisdictional agency.
4. This development shall dedicate adequate drainage and
ponding easements to incorporate the required high water
elevation necessitated by City storm water storage volume
requirements.
C. Plans and Specifications
1. All public
service tc
registered
codes and
approved by
STANDARD CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL
;:reets and utilities necessary to provide
is development shall be designed by a
,:sessional engineer in accordance with City
:ineering standards and policies, and
:: ff prior to final plat approval.
2. A detailed grading, drainage, erosion, and sediment
control plan must be prepared in accordance with current
City standards and approved by staff prior to final plat
approval.
3. This development shall insure that all temporary dead end
public streets shall have a cul -de -sac constructed in
accordance with City engineering standards.
4. A detailed landscape plan shall be submitted on the
proposed grading plan and approved by staff prior to the
final plat approval. The financial guarantee shall be
included in the Development Contract and not released
until one year after the date of installation.
I "Tr)
STANDARD CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL
PAGE TWO
5. All internal public and private streets shall be
constructed within the required right -of -way in
accordance with City design standards.
D. Public Improvements
1 . I f any public improvements are to be installed under a
City contract, the appropriate project must be approved
by Council action prior to final plat approval.
E. Permits
1. This development shall be responsible for the acquisition
of all regulatory agency permits in the time frame
required by the affected agency.
F. Parks Dedication
1. This development shall fulfull its parks dedication
requirements as recommended by the Advisory Parks and
Recreation Commission and approved by Council action.
G. Other
1. All standard platting and zoning conditions shall be
adhered to unless specifically granted a variance by
Council action.
Approved:
Revised:
LTS *2
STANDARD
Advisory Planning Commission City Council
Auqu_7 :5, 1987
September 15, 1987
°
r.:44 .17L
Cy 4
I , !1
A.t.roAV
.74
. -111
cr ; •
r ;
• ::
LA 4
• \,,2
?ft.",•• jta
c• C
=
,
L.
FM S -
h
ZZ 1O or or -4
CCAm r4C
V' �DZ 131<•-■-1
m CAIN N( -DD CD-'
[n (I1 T-1 -1 m3I r-
3a �n� ty rn r.
S . 00< ' 0->
i CZy r- m m
-1 -1 m r- CA m
NN '0 D
L m X. \r
-4
m
9
z
0 m
b� m
z
^a 'x o
T m GI
p N
2 IO . N H'1 W
O -4 Qp • ,
0NO� X 1,3 COI
aOD 0 C too
A. y 0 DD
nn
I „a 1 d 7.-- i In N A T
f 0 •
.•. .•r -.«+ �...
• II WWI Nr• 00 OS
0
0
0
0
- a —
0 0 .3
A 014;111
ele•S 4040
• !..• JR.I.., � • .
i
. 5
}
}
•
<—••
ROBE "%T.:«
ENGINEERING
COMPANY, INC.
1 •■■•■■1611. IMMISIM MIS* PO •■•••
. • •"
• • Tr
.............
•
..............
•
PRELIMINARY
GRADING, DRAINAGE AND EROSION CONTROL. PLAN
STRATFORD OAKS
•••••■•01M111
- N -
o -o too too
1
j •• •...•
E.1
NWT
Nolimme• OICIA..1101•11....1
- ROM .1••••
1•••••••I
MIGAlt• 11M1.001.1• DANCE MANN.
INWARD Wen moins
0.••■••• KM
I KEN APPELSAINI
•ND
DAN 01411A1SON
4
3
0
�'.-af �'"�c ti r.�
0
\\S,
I
o
ui
• CL E A,
("3 • CIR
L E
c '-tes
922,5
92
920 0
1'1
00 10 0 10
N 0 0 4 0 O 0 0
6 0
0 0
O
sasr -
k
1
\\c0
_9205
S
:J
40 ID ID ID
N W
000 0
•
ID ID
4 to, cn
o 0 0
—
C >
A
•J
Cr
zz'I00'OTr -4
ccammc33 00
03 CD II 4 n
m
00<. . �
TTOO O� a -
yym r N q 3.
o r
m r
-D•
a
a
•.IW ..v r' . .T.•..✓ 4"w.. y •� .Yi..r/ .,_ •L
.ina.1 uun
._.
1
J
o _ f`
O 1 I
to 4
J W
0
, WO, 611 osa 61
:... °; �..., • ....,
I
r:; o
1 1 1 1
F!'
I
l E
-q YYi
II 41
s ,
x
— I
D_
f"
00_
44 •
• • • ■•• •/
)4,•••• ••• •
• t c't
r
k
(r
•1
H
..-r' 1./
.
- _. •
a
T
Z � m m G O� q ,
c _3, u�G? r s, N
� - 4.' 11 :I n rfq 71 V Q ■
9p L. .9 Z ,
ot
00 m v o i t � •
oy r N ', ✓ y
V\
VI
VII
Z = i =
� _ . a .• � �.aw t • 1�
Li D ° Ga0 g 9 � V� I*J
C� •
P � N =n:^
\ O
city of eagan
: PUBLIC
WORKS
DEPARTMEN
WATER
MASTER PLAN
approved:
standard
plato :
I 1 . - r; 4 F t 4. ;1-, -. ,
o .0/ 98.0
90.2/
101.0. '
•
l p8 ' '4
9 3.5/104.0
72.0
18"
J/ „
43.3/70.0 p � ;
II,
46.0/ 72.0
5 39.0/65 0
16"
IMO - -
1 '
•
;
,
L.J'L1JT 1J J 1. , / Y I AO
I n T ft _,! 121 I B„ L ._.
— , ...-r.. 1 r , .. .r-r... row v.
Z�•i'74 'Q 18" / 52.ti/67.0 ; •
24. -
-GROUND STORAGE 44.6/59.0 �• '
1059
.: •. � /.1
\0\qs
or
r1 ‘
1 A -. t
• L
1 //
x5 .4/1070 f 61.0/'65.0
1
12"
43.2/68,0
•
�. Sri , - -11 •
• -. r
• • i ' 1
I.
i f
r\
ti 86.0/95.0 l'•_ \ - 1\./ -=
G , .�
? •..1h. ,.. -,1
- 4 i i
,li..r 4:1,8141.0
''i 1..:, , � _A ' , 212
24" 9t:8/i97.9
01.5/ 9aa: l. \ 215� 83.4/91.'0
1: }-: r 1-•,
FIG #3
A -n
• -
8663
86"
city of eagan
WORKS
DEPARTMENT
27" A-s
• - 8
886.0
8P-33
• - ---AP-5I ; •• '
. ; .
- 890.
'; •' A P-23
I , - 894 , •
. •-- ,
: -■
..._. , %.
; 910.0
i
,
/ .,. ..,06 1
:? BP-23 • / ' ,.
_ , .....: i • .- / j __ 8p.. 9 i; 932.3.. s '
• ..,.
.1:1 893.3/ : • ..... .
:43 9(3 C -: - ' •'•••-,•••....
BP-I0
.;909.8-
.
. . . :., .''.• • - ' ' ' ' -
I
1• i t:: B P-20 '''
y ; • ..: :: 916.0. ;•;--
_ , i T .,'• c •41:
- ..
. • .-:- -_ •,.;-, - ‘s3-
• . : 8 P - 35
; . • . .: • ; . 908.0
. ,...., A • / • • 920. 2
- - • : .-- . / ,
,
42j
BP- 6
882.0
9/0.0
STORM SEWER
MASTER PLAN
-"" BP-28
" 862.6
868.0
48" B-b
BP-3
889. 9
t 905.2 t
‘5
N
THC:2.PP
•••
8P-4
13 P - "•) 874.2
924.0 • • _ 4 .
9272
24
•
-c
B P -2
882.1
5 0
HEAL:HIS
L.S.-3; 16
I •
••-
BP-19 927 0'
- "•.915.0 •
15 920.0 . I
I -
916.0 • • j A T
•••••• ••s, 920.0 • 1
• • :" • • • ?"7io
26 .0 '::•-•••••::••• • : 7:2 " ' •
.)2 7 : . -
; 908.0
J P-
( 871
87
1
BP - 5 I ."•
874.5
_c95 6.5 • ,1: •
)•.;-; BP-17 I- :
887.1 - •
892.0 1 .:
*'. !BP-7
02.'
. 9018.0
L ,
' • •
-•••••■ • •
•
• • J
• - f
8P1'
899.0
-
90/./
approved:
F
standard
plate if:
MEMORANDUM
TO: THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
FROM: KEN VRAA, DIRECTOR OF PARKS & RECREATION
DATE: APRIL 12, 1988
SUBJECT: STRATFORD OAKS ADDITION
The Advisory Commission reviewed the proposed Stratford Oaks Ad-
dition at its April 7th, Advisory Commission meeting. It was
noted that 1.9 acres of this addition had previously filled this
park dedication requirement under the Thomas Lake Heights PD.
The Advisory Commission was also asked to consider providing park
dedication credit for the proposed on -site recreational
facilities.
After considerable discussion by the Advisory Commission concern-
ing the proposed on -site amenities to be provided by the
developer, the Advisory Commission made the following recommenda-
tions to the City Council on this plat:
1. The developer receive the equivalent of 1.9 acres, which is
18.24 units, as credit towards the parks dedication respon-
sibility.
2. The developer receive a cash dedication credit of $6,000 for
the proposed on -site amenities.
3. The developer provide a cash dedication.
4. The developer provide a trail along Thomas Lake Road and
County Road #30.
KV /bls
cc: Marilyn Wucherpfennig, Planning Aide
Ed Kirsch, Senior Engineering Technician
March 24, 1988
24. Storm sewer inlet filters may be required after the
utilities are constructed. The proposed design of inlet filters and
the catch basins to be protected should be on the plan.
25. If construction work is going to venture into the water of
the storm water ponds on this site, then a floatable silt curtain
needs to be used. This practice reduces sediment transport into the
ponds during the filling procedure.
26. Areas disturbed by utility construction need to be seeded
and mulched. This needs to be specified on the plan.
27. Construction routes need to be located on the plan and a
drawing shown that details the design to be used.
All voted affirmatively.
STRATFORD OAKS ADDITION - PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AMENDMENT
REZONING AND PRELIMINARY PLAT
Chairman Pawlenty opened the next public hearing of the evening
in regard to the applications of D. H. Gustafson and Ken Applebaum
requesting a rezoning of 1.9 R -2 acres within the Thomas Lake
Heights Addition to a planned development district and an amendment
to the Eagan 40 PD to include that land for a total of 328 rental
apartment units. Mr. Sturm introduced the project including the 1.9
acres previously owned by Meritor Development. He noted that the
Eagan 40 PUD was approved in 1975 with an extension in 1986
providing for 338 units.
The Deerfield preliminary plat had not moved'ahead and the road
being proposed was consistent with the PUD. He noted that the road
had been shifted slightly to the north which was a benefit to the
property owners to the south, by moving the apartments further from
their back yards. He noted that the buildings would be somewhat
similar to the Forest Ridge buildings, although of a different
exterior. There were two buildings that would be only 60 feet from
the centerline of the proposed through- street, rather than 80 as
required by City Code. A private street would be conducted from
Diffley Road to the east -west street.
Mr. Dan Gustafson, the developer and landscape architect,
advised that he had developed approximately 350 apartments and 250
single family homes in Eagan since 1972. He described a 100 foot
elevation difference within the bounds of the property and indicated
a plan to save as much existing vegetation as possible, particularly
along the property to the south.
10
a��
APC Minutes
March 24, 1988
The units would be stained light grey with cream -white trim,
with brick in certain areas. Additional garages had been added to
the scheme provided in Forest Ridge resulting in two stalls for many
apartments and 75% direct access. Two different building styles
were proposed with the smaller building having one - bedroom
apartments. He also provided line of site sketches indicating the
view from the property to the south. All parking would be contained
within a courtyard area, lessening the impact on neighboring
properties. The buildings were of such a nature that they follow
the fall of the terrain and very little grading would be required
other than the knob in the southwest portion of the property. He
also described existing trees that would remain and advised that the
line site drawings showed mature trees which would not develop for
some time. Subsequent to the SWCD report, the water in the
northerly pond was determined to drain to the north.
Laura Helgeson- Vargus of 4307 B Clemson indicated that she was
directly adjacent to the property and that her developer had advised
that the property was all zoned R -1. She also questioned the
ability of the intersection of Thomas Lake and Diffley Road to
handle additional traffic. Mr. Foertsch indicated that the County
plans to upgrade Diffley in 1989 and that semaphores were being
considered, especially in light of the potential development north
of Diffley.
Mr. Vicky Staudte, 1566 Baylor Court, questioned where the
drainage would go from the southerly portion of the property. Mr.
Gustafson described the drainage and grading plan and the intent to
leave most areas along the southerly boundary undisturbed. He also
described the elevation and screening for the tennis courts. Dust
would be minimized by disturbing as little soil as possible at one
time_and providing_crushed rock in all temporary construction roads.
Member Trygg questioned the number of units that would now be
available to the 2.2 acres on the east side of Thomas Lake Road,
suggesting that it should be limited to 10 units since the PD
allowed a total of 338 with 328 being within this apartment complex,
with it was the understanding that the developer had not requested
additional units.
Member Wilkins suggested that the tennis court should not be
lighted and questioned the rentability of efficiency apartments.
Mr,. _Gustafson indicated that previously constructed efficiency
apartments had rented immediately and the proposed units would cost
from $430.00 to $460.00 per month, including garages, washers,
dryers and dishwashers. He advised member Wilkins that he did agree
with the conditions suggested by staff.
Member Voracek suggested that the landlord -owner should advise
all tenants of the existence of the Williams Brothers pipeline to
which the developer agreed. The developer indicated to member Trygg
that their plans for the second phase were very conservative in
light of what the market had shown for these types of units.
rare r4111Ultb
March 24, 1988
Mr. Foertsch indicated that the upgrade in assessments was for
the change in the zoning on the 1.9 acres. Mr. Gustafson indicated
that a retaining wall might be required on the south side of the
pond adjacent to the east -west street.
Mr. Merkley suggested that water quality concerns of SWCD be
included and a variance be provided for a 60 foot setback to
preserve trees and address site sensitivity.
Voracek moved, Wilkins seconded the motion to recommend approval
of the planned development amendment and rezoning to add 1.9 acres
and allow 328 apartment units, subject to the remaining 2.2 acres
having 10 units. All voted in favor except Voracek who voted no.
. Voracek moved, Wilkins seconded the motion to recommend rezoning
of the 1.9 acres to PD. All voted yes.
Voracek moved, Merkley seconded the motion to recommend approval
of the preliminary plat, subject to the following conditions:
1. This development shall accept its assessment
obligations as defined in the staff's report in accordance with the
final plat dimensions and the rates in effect at the time of final
plat approval.
2. This development shall dedicate 10 foot drainage and utility
easements centered over all common lot lines and adjacent to private
property or public right -of -way.
3. This development shall dedicate, provide, or financially
guarantee its proportionate share of the acquisition costs of
additional drainage, ponding, and utility easements as required by
the alignment, depth, and storage capacity of all required public
utilities and streets located beyond the boundaries of this plat or
outside of dedicated public right -of -way as necessary to service
this development.
4. This development shall dedicate all public right -of -way and
temporary slope easements for ultimate development of adjacent
roadways as required by the appropriate jurisdictional agency.
5. This development shall dedicate adequate drainage and
ponding easements to incorporate the required high water elevation
necessitated by City storm water storage volume requirements.
6. All public streets and utilities necessary to provide
service to this development shall be designed by a registered
professional engineer in accordance with City codes and engineering
standards and policies, and approved by staff prior to final plat
approval.
March 24, 1988
7. A detailed grading, drainage, erosion, and sediment control
plan must be prepared in accordance with current City standards and
approved by staff prior to final plat approval.
8. This development shall insure that all temporary dead end
public streets shall have a cul -de -sac constructed in accordance
with City engineering standards.
9. All internal public and private streets shall be constructed
within the required right -of -way in accordance with City design
standards.
10. If any public improvements are be installed under a City
contract, the appropriate project must be approved by Council action
prior to final plat approval.
11. This development shall be responsible for the acquisition
of all regulatory agency permits in the time frame required by the
affected agency.
12. This development shall fulfill its parks dedication
requirements as recommended by the Advisory Parks and Recreation
Commission and approved by Council action.
13. All standard platting and zoning conditions shall be
adhered to unless specifically granted a variance by Council action.
14. The landlord /owner shall make each potential renter aware
of the William Brothers pipeline through the renter's Lease.
15. 'One covered stall. -shall -be included with the rent.
16. A negative declaration on the EAW shall be determined prior
to the final plat submission.
17. All trash shall be contained in each unit until the day of
pickup.
18. All site generated runoff is required to be directed to the
proposed centrally located ponding area prior to the discharge into
the public storm sewer system.
19. All roof top runoff from the proposed buildings along the
edges of the development is required to be routed to the proposed
centrally located ponding area.
20. Proper water main looping and extension to the westerly
adjacent property is required.
21. The detail design for the centrally located ponding area is
required to address both quantitative as well as qualitative
requirements and limited to a 1 CFS outflow rate.
lieu Minutes
March 24, 1988
22. No lighting shall be allowed for the tennis courts.
23. The concerns of the Soil, Water and Conservation District
herein shall be addressed.
24. Variances for 60 foot setbacks from the east -west road
shall be allowed.
25. The following general criteria shall be addressed in the
final grading, drainage and erosion control plan:
a. Several areas that have storm water drainage directed
off -site will require more than a silt fence as perimeter control.
More details need to be provided about the retaining walls proposed
throughout the site. Timing of retaining wall construction also
should be addressed.
b. Sediment basin specifications need to be provided on
the plan and preliminary construction schedules that reflect when
trapping measure will be installed.
c. The plan does not specify how storm water will outlet
from the storm water pond along Diffley Road. If this enters a
ditch outlet system the adequacy of the conveyance system needs to
be analyzed.
d. If filling or other construction activity ventures
below the water level in a pond, then a floatable silt curtain needs
to be used and specified on the plan.
e. All anticipated ingress and egress points should be
shown on the plan.
f. A contract person needs to be identified on the plan
who will handle erosion control questions. Note. #10 on the plan
indicates home builders will be responsible during the building
phase. Since this is not in keeping with Eagan's guidelines, the
note should be removed from the plan.
All voted yes.
YSTAL PONDS ADDITION - PRELIMINARY PLAT & VARIANCE �---'
The next publ i. aring convened by Mr. Paw �.nty' was in regard
to the applications o sp Construction_ o-f preliminary plat of
13.7 R -4 (Multiple) zoned acres oc,-1'37 apartment units and a
variance for cul -de -sacs in ex.Ge 500 feet located south of
Highway #55 in the nort half of Section Mr. Sturm indicated
the property had b n-bned R -4 in about 1971 or 1 The proposal
would consist of -two lots with private streets and long cam. -sacs,
Agenda Information Memo
April 19, 1988, City Council Meeting
PRELIMINARY PLAT /CRYSTAL PONDS
R. Preliminary Plat for Crystal Ponds /ASP Construction of 13.7
R -4 Zoned Acres for 137 Apartment Units and Variance for Cul -De-
Sacs in Excess of 500' - -A public hearing was held by the Advisory
Planning Commission at their last regular meeting held on March
24, 1988, to consider the preliminary plat application for the
Crystal Ponds Addition consisting of 137 rental apartment units
on 13.47 acres located along the south side of Highway 55 just
north of the Bur Oak Park area. The Comprehensive Guide Plan
designates this area D -2, mixed residential 0 -6 units per acre.
The APC is recommending denial of the applications.
For additional information on this item, refer to the Planning
and Engineeri • repartment reports, a copy is enclosed on pages
through
The Parks and Recreation Commission met on April 7, 1988 and if
the City Council decides to approve this project, they are
recommending that the plat be subject to a cash dedication
requirement.
For a copy of the action that was taken by the Planning
Commission, refer to those minutes, a copy is enclosed on pages
?g-61 through 2 9;1..
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the
application for a preliminary plat entitled Crystal Pond Addition
consisting of 137 rental apartment units on 13.47 acres located
adjacent to Highway 55 just north of the Bur Oak Park area.
CITY OF EAGAN
SUBJECT: PRELIMINARY PLAT - CRYSTAL PONDS ADDITION
APPLICANT: ASP CONSTRUCTION CO.
LOCATION: NE 1/4, SECTION 12
EXISTING ZONING: R -4 (MULTIPLE)
DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: MARCH 24, 1988
DATE OF REPORT: MARCH 15, 1988
REPORTED BY: PLANNING & ENGINEERING DEPARTMENTS
APPLICATIONS: An application has been submitted requesting a Preliminary Plat
for the Crystal Ponds Addition consisting of 137 rental apartment units on
13.47 acres located along the south side of Hwy. 55 just north of the Bur Oak
Park area. The property was zoned to R -4 (Multiple) previously. The Land Use
Guide Plan designates this area R -11 Mixed Residential (3 -6 units /acre).
However the existing zoning supercedes that plan.
EXISTING CONDITIONS: This site is surrounded by single family homes on the
west and south. A home on approximately .70 acres immediately to the west of
the apartment property line physically separates the two uses. The proposed
plat does provide a connection to that area if it were ever to develop for
additional apartments. General business zoned property with a landscape
contractor company abutts to the east. Currently, the site is primarily open
grass land except for some scattered deciduous trees. They are thickest along
the edge of the nearly 3 acre pond.
SITE PLAN: One access point that serves this site splits creating two cul -de-
sacs measuring approximately 750' and 900' long. This code has a maximum
length of 500', however the grades fall rapidly toward the pond and connecting
the two cul -de -sacs would be nearly impossible.
The developer also constructed the Royal Oaks Apartments along the west side
of Federal Drive. This proposed building is not the same style. These are
smaller units that have tuck -under garages similar to the Forest Ridge
Apartments where each unit has a private garage. Fifteen buildings are
proposed: 10 with 8 units, 3 with 11 units and 2 with 12 units. Development
will occur in four phases working back from the pond area towards the west and
south. Most units will have direct access from the garage. Vinyl siding with
a grey or blue /grey color is proposed. Amenities include fireplaces in some
units, tot lot, exterior pool and a recreation building.
A six foot tall chain link fence is proposed along the southern property line
but not along the east or west lines. There is concern that children will be
cutting through the yards to the south in order to get to Bur Oak Park. Staff
requested that sections be drawn showing the relationship to the homes to the
south to better illustrate the neighbors concerns. They were provided by the
applicant and the landscaping was also increased.
oo7
This plat has a density of 10 units /acre and all code setbacks have been
adhered to. Code requires that one covered parking stall shall be provided
with the rent for a 1:1 interior /exterior parking ratio. This has been
provided and additional guest parking areas can be constructed along the
internal private streets.
GRADING /DRAINAGE /EROSION CONTROL: The Preliminary Grading Plan
submitted as a part of this application identifies fill areas of
approximately 6 to 10 feet along the ponding area designated as
GP -3 in the Comprehensive Storm Sewer Plan. The proposed filling
of Pond GP -3 virtually eliminates all of the existing topography
along the southerly and westerly side of the ponding area. The
Comprehensive Storm Sewer Plan calls for a high water elevation
of approximately 816 for this Pond and Pond GP -2, located north
of State Highway #55. According to the grading plan submitted,
the existing low point in State Highway #55 is at an approximate
elevation of 814. Given the fact that the existing highway
elevation is lower than the proposed high water elevations of GP-
2 and GP -3, it unrealistic to assume that the ponds high water
elevations can remain at the proposed 816 elevation. The
Comprehensive Storm Sewer Plan calls for a required storage area
in Pond GP -2 and GP -3 of 98 acre feet. The existing storage
volume between the normal water level of 804.3 and a proposed
high water level of 814 provides approximately 74 acre feet of
storage. Based on the assumption that the 305 acres which are
directly tributary to Ponds GP -2 and GP -3 develop as multi -
residential, the existing storage volume of 74 acre feet is
not adequate. Encroachment below the 814/816 elevation in Pond
GP -3 cannot be allowed.
Cut and fill areas on the remainder of the site range from a fill
of approximately 3 feet in the northwesterly corner to cut areas
of about 20 feet towards the central portion of the site. Graded
slopes throughout. this site are required to meet the maximum
allowable 3 to 1 slope criteria.
The Development proposes to intercept the site generated runoff
in an internal storm sewer system and convey this runoff to Pond
GP -3. Pond GP -3 is intended to receive direct runoff from this
area. The Preliminary Grading Plan does not adequately define
overland drainage routes to accommodate the runoff generated by
the adjacent properties. The Development is required to extend a
storm sewer stub to its westerly property line to serve the
adjacent property.
A Preliminary Erosion and Sediment Control Plan was submitted for
staff review. Please see the attached comments provided by the
Dakota County Soil & Water Conservation District.
�o
UTILITIES: Sanitary sewer of sufficient capacity and depth is
readily available along State Highway #55. The Development is
required to provide a sanitary sewer service stub to the westerly
property line to serve the westerly adjacent property. The
proposed internal sanitary sewer system adequately serves the
site development.
Water main service of sufficient capacity and pressure and is
readily available along State Highway #55. The Development
proposes to adequately loop its water main system through the
site.
STREETS /ACCESS /CIRCULATION: Public street access to this site is
available and is proposed in one location off of State Highway
#55.
The Development proposes to provide internal street circulation
through the use of a private street system. A cross easement to
the westerly adjacent property is required through this
Development.
All proposed private internal streets are required to conform to
City code requirements.
EASEMENTS /RIGHT -OF- WAY - PERMITS: Appropriate easements are
required for all public utilities installed outside of the public
right -of -way. A drainage and utility easement is required- for
Pond GP -3. Pond GP -3 is identified as being under the
jurisdiction of the Department of Natural Resources. Any
encroachment or work within the ponding area will require the
appropriate permit from the DNR.
All regulatory agency permits shall be acquired within the
appropriate time frame as required by the affected agency.
ASSESSMENTS: The oarcel-proposed for planning as the Crystal
Ponds Addition ha- been levied the appropriate trunk area
assessments._,_Ther�; re pQ,pendipg_assessments of record and. no
assessments are prc_ sed as a condition of final plat approval.
a01
MINNESOTA
SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICTS
`larch 4, 1938
To: Mike Foertsch
City of Fagan
From: John t3arten
Dakota County S
Re: Crystal Ponds Addition Preliminary Plat Review
Soil Resources:
The majority of this site consists of Kingsley and Nahtomedi
soils. These are well drained and excessively drained sandy
loam and loamy sand soils well suited for their intended
use.
In some low areas and drainage ways of the Kingsley
Mahto,nedi soils and along the pond border there are high
water table and, high organic water content soils. These
are Quant and Kennebec Variant silt loam soils. The water -
'table ranges from 2.0 feet above to 2.0 feet below the
existing surface. These soils also have a high potential
; f.or.frost.actior and a moderate shrink -swell potential.
-Recommendations: ,;,.
A„(L,
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER
\)
DAKOTA COUNTY SOIL AND WATER
CONSERVATION DISTRICT
Farmington Professional Building
P.O. Box 129
821 Third Street
Farmington. MN 55024
Phone: (612) 463-8626
:::.SQil_ borings sho:., be done by a geotechnical firm to
70termit1e the site specific suitability for the soil and the
prposed _use .
"Wai er t-esources :
Runoff from the Crystal Ponds Addition flows into GP -2 from
where it is discharged to GP -1.1, 13urview Park Pond. GP -1.1
has been designated as a Class I :•iaterbody in the proposed
Eagan dater Quality Management Plan.
Summary:
5. The Company responsible for maintaining and
removing all erosion and sediment control practices
should be included in the plan. (GC -14)
ii. Stormsewer inlet filters may be needed around catcn
basins to prevent sediment movement into the pond.
(CC -9)
7. All stor.nsewers outletting into watercourses should
he adequately protected to prevent scouring from
occurinc at the outlet. (GC -8)
S. Identify on the plan where topsoil will be
stockpile:.. Topsoil can be strategically stockpiled to
prevent sediment from enterino GP -2. A temoorary
topsoil dike may be needed along the top of the fill
slope entering CP -2 until the slope is re- vegetated.
9. Include construction schedules for rough grading,
installing utilities, re- vegetating the site, building
construction, curb and gutter, and blacktoppinr.. These
schedules i :noact erosion and sediment control
requirements.
10. Identify how erosion control will be handled
during the building phase of development.
11. ;':ore detail is needed on the plan to show how
runoff will be directed around buildings.
12. Show now the fill slopes below the high water
level of GP -2 will be protected in the event of a major
rainstorm. Erosion control matting may be needed until
vegetation is re- established.
We recommend tha: - :e preliminary plat be approved, but that
a revised erosic7. :ontrol plan be approved and a-nutrient
detention basin designed before a grading permit is
granted or final plat is approved.
cc: McCombs Frank Roos Associates, Inc.
ASP Construction Co., Inc.
l�1
Development of the site will increase phosphorus runoff to
CP -2 by approximately 19 pounds /year and increase phosphorus
loading to Burview Park Pond by 16 pounds /year. In order to
maintain the existing water quality in ^urview Park Pond,
the increased *anosohorus loading resulting from site
development should be reduced to pre - development conditions.
`codification of GP -2 to act as a nutrient detention basin
was modeled using criteria developed by William Walker, Jr.
The Walker model indicates that developing a wet Pond volume
of approximately 4 acre feet in GP -2 will reduce phosphorus
loajinn to Burview Park Pond to pre- development levels. The
inflow from CP -3 was added to runoff from the development
site when the analysis was done. It appears that GP -2 has
adequate size to develop the necessary wet pond storage
volume.
Recommendations:
7 \ nutrient detention basin with a wet pond volume of
approximately 4 acre feet should be constructed at the site
to reduce Phosphorus runoff to Burview Park Pond to pre -
development levels.
Erosion and Sediment Control:
An incomplete' Erosion and Sediment Control Plan (E &SC) was
submitted with the plan. A complete E &SC plan following the
Dakota County S'..CD "General Criteria" should be submitted.
The plan should include the following specific practices:
1. The site :,Zap should identify all ingress and egress
points for the site. A rock construction entrance pad
will be necessary at ingress and egress points to
minimize tr :_.'%:ing of mud by vehicles onto paved
surfaces. - -11)
2. Silt cu: ins must be properly installed before any
land distur:._:_:ce occurs. (GC -4)
3. The re- vegetation of all areas disturbed by utility
construction must be addressed in the plan. (GC -11)
4. Maintenance of erosion and sediment control
measures during and after rough grading should be
included in the plan. (CC -14)
CONDITIONS: CRYSTAL PONDS
1. These standard conditions of plat approval as adopted by
Council action on September 15, 1987 shall be complied with:
B1, B2, B3, B4, Cl, C2, C3, C4, C5, D1, El, F1, and G1.
2. One covered parking stall shall be included with the rent.
3. The variance for the cul -de -sac length shall be approved.
4. All trash shall be contained in each unit (garage) until the day
of pickup.
5. No encroachment into Pond GP -3 will be allowed.
6. An easementfor ingress and egress across the proposed Development
providing an alternate point of public access to the westerly
adjacent property is required.
7. The Development is required to provide public utility extensions
to its westerly boundary.
A. Assessments
STANDARD CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL
1. This development shall accept its additional assessment
obligations as defined in the staff's report in
accordance with the final plat dimensions and the rates
in effect at the time of final plat approval.
B. Easements and Rights -of -Way
1. This development shall dedicate 10' drainage and utility
easements centered over all common lot lines and adjacent
to private property or public right -of -way.
2. This development shall dedicate, provide, or financially
guarantee its proportionate share of the acquisition
costs of additional drainage, ponding, and utility
easements as required by the alignment, depth, and
storage capacity of all required public utilities and
streets located beyond the boundaries of this plat or
outside of dedicated public right -of -way as necessary to
service this development.
3. This development shall dedicate all public right -of -way
and temporary slope easements for ultimate development of
adjacent roadways as required by the appropriate
jurisdictional agency.
4. This development shall dedicate adequate drainage and
ponding easements to incorporate the required high water
elevation necessitated by City storm water storage volume
requirements.
C. Plans and Specifications
1. All public streets and utilities necessary to provide
service to this development shall be designed by a
registered professional engineer in accordance with City
codes and engineering standards and policies, and
approved by staff prior to final plat approval.
2. A detailed grading, drainage, erosion, and sediment
control plan must be prepared in accordance with current
City standards and approved by staff prior to final plat
approval.
3. This development shall insure that all temporary dead end
public streets shall have a cul -de -sac constructed in
accordance with City engineering standards.
4. A detailed landscape plan shall be submitted on the
proposed grading plan and approved by staff prior to the
final plat approval. The financial guarantee shall be
included in the Development Contract and not released
until one year after the date of installation.
STANDARD CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL
PAGE TWO
5. All internal public and private streets shall be
constructed within the required right -of -way in
accordance with City design standards.
D. Public Improvements
1. If any public improvements are to be installed under a
City contract, the appropriate project must be approved
by Council action prior to final plat approval.
E. Permits
1. This development shall be responsible for the acquisition
of all regulatory agency permits in the time frame
required by the affected agency.
F. Parks Dedication
1. This development shall fulfull its parks dedication
requirements as recommended by the Advisory Parks and
Recreation Commission and approved by Council action.
G. Other
1. All standard platting and zoning conditions shall be
adhered to unless specifically granted a variance by
Council action.
Approved: August 25, 1987
Revised:
LTS #2
STANDARD
Advisory - Planning Commission
a (s
City Council
September 15, 1987
-
"*.
r
t • \\
I I
r-•••
3
, - - •
Sa. S'
'Y..,
' I
\
/ ....
‘
1 f• ;
•• ..)^ 0
-.-
, \?,
-I, •
•
\ .'.-
91
S !
71 /11 1 7H,
0 Si 1
I . • , . I .... ..,_'. ri
to.rER'
1p,A... p j I
1 .0:Ant: 1 1_ 1 I
=1
- ... 1
S t'-li
\
•
- ,c7\
/ I U
• . . „.1,1
-4 . 4
t
• D.11_
Ii
}
a�
E
Wur
to
F-+
9
{ P I _1
� x
Ps.
1
1
i
b V
C
•
j
1,
. -
•
v /
7 / z
A
,
.
- -
(
z
,
JI
•
r
11
1
�,)
1
' --ri�/7% , /
E
I
•
‘": I \ •
•-•
_ ' 5
•
/ •'" /-**
/ / r
- „
(
.; ",,,-) -
• , 2 4 -• ) ,---0 .,.-.,-- •-•-• --
.■..■•■ , ... # , .-...., , , , ■,.. .....„.......,
, ,_../ , • ••-__, ' •,. , , • f•••• ,... ‘..__,....,_,,,
'.■ N. ' , ,
m -
,..., - • ''
• , . - , ,
,,,, _. / .,‘,.. ..-::
-
•-•.••• , ) , .4. /
. ''-- :...- _, , -• f '
-'...-
. /' •-.---- —,
/ ,,. ,--\-_,/ 1 --), , Z■....../ ,.
-- -•"
, ,.. cr, ,....,.. 7..;;,,_.;‘,•=7:'-) , -''.. \ .7, v -
! ,( • c: .
'5 1....-; ^ •
■ -- • • • : - ',_ -- _ - 1 1 !
7 i
, A --".'-') .---------- 7
, • ,.,
._.
rri
5.
Ki) -
• I
c •
co
t 0•••,1...c‘F•C
:- 7 -.---7-1-_-Th - „-- 1 ', = " ' 7
....-;--, - ---.7 T ---• ' , . i '''
, ...- ,- -\1: ___: _ ----- (
- ----:"-'% ..
,, --. , " - ",- ,7-- , , (
i
Planning C2MMiER1CM C..nairman
lanning Ltmmission :::empers
City :cuncil Memo-era
iear
Chaosi Lane.
Eagan.
:r!inreacza
:!arcn
am writing wiLn r-3qapc zo tne t:iED Construction
peve!ooment o!- Crystal Fonoz Aocition in Eagan.
chi Lan mv nu ann 1 are
relative - MR , NC:MRrE" tne neignocrn000. 72VR vsry mucn RM.;2VR:t tME
the area over tne ano are tneeicre ::fl:377EC IMCN
'-.ED ppent could cnange a:: tnis. wren NR MOVEC] TIC , j5=E! Lane
27:E' 15 71 was ::no agrioultural ano. to n; ::5CNIEC,c1E.
..ere never given a VOICE 15 the oec:sion to cnange 7:5ET: ooning to
multiple cwel;ing. we heignoors nave written to tne citv on a: :REE: :NC
pooasions to ask tne coninq oe onanged to RI put nave 5EVE:" eceiveo
aonowlement cu. correspondence.
ti5EUM1M,7 there 1E notnin.g Ne C:5 :C change tme ochin,4 az
tnis point we are wonoering 1.S ter e isn 1 wav ve can az :east
1;71Z :n a duality development on tnic land.
+irzt concern is for tne density of tne bevelcoment.
artist's rendition: of tria development look very attractive - from
hignwav ff. It would appear that tne hiqn censitv of the development
ifl oe wnat we. tn2 neignaors, have to look au. Does zone R4 have to
meanisuch high censity? It seems to me that large puilaings would look
far more attractive if tnev had plenty of grassy in arouna them. It
would also allow more space for piling the snow after it nas peen
clearec from the street.- something I see little room ior on this plan.
1 ou1 0 ask that, It the density must Pe E0 hign. COUiG it not : more
concentrate° around the pond?
1 noticed that the units nou.I.2,3.4, ano f in
particular.are very Close to the eoge of tne property. Can NE nsignbors
- =mot - ÷or - More space between cur single familv 5:MEE and these :E. unit
buildings?
Another concern of mine is with tne curapilitv of the exterior
ding materials. Vinyl and aluminum are attractive wnen firet
installed but wriat about 20 cr so years from how - wnen 1 is still
living in my none on Cnaoel Lane and :he puiloar has long since scl his
deveiopment and gone back to North Dakota? I believe Prick e:<teriors
would Keep their good oaks a much 1 onger :erica.
ThP rovlsed plan for the development does include a o —foot
:main ink fence along the south Property l ln°_ . :Unit about the west
I t becomes apparent to rye that the cuickest way for children to
c:et ro purr Uak: -irk from this development will eitner de through my
signoor' s or mv property — if tnev are not api e to _ =ale a o —i t . fence.
Prom what i have seen of Eagan in my . ears here 1 wou i o sa'v we
nave enough !C'•J Cost housing for many, many years to come. As 1
undor=oano it• many are offering incentives Such as zwo months' free
rent. or = 200 worth of groceries It pr':Opie will sign leases. We . ec =ntiv
r sosivs- advertising from Lexington Fi ic=y to save ± :2./2,0') "or more" it W°
buy = er =r_ Horsi -. 1 _.nougnt tnev were attract:._ buildings out NOUIO
onev are not selling eizrer. we really need more in _.,e same
_.nge in Eagan?
Do we have eutticient nign duality townncmea^ Aoccrdin- to the
:: 2V of Ilarcn 7. I"lencc_a. Heignts Cam_. Council :i_.s approved
i p;cn for s,22f.t,:O) to nn_mec for Victoria Higniance. " -,Toni Eagan use
EDM2 fno same Duality development With the corporate n= OOuar of
No=..__- tilri lne ano >_JFS nearby. tnio CCL;I P t'e an CC_Cr'tunitv to
en_._= corporate Directors to move into Eagan.
As our representati`.''es 1 do hope that you will gi'. t serious
con =loci ation to the concerns of the residents of --pie nsignocrhooD. The
,ira.jor of us have 1 ived here for many, manv 'year's and would 1 ik._
en,lo- c.:r" nomes for many 'years to come.
Council approves plan for
Victoria Highlands in MH
Residents near Marie Avenue
and Victoria Road in Mendota
Heights may soon be watching
$225,000. townhomes and
$250,000 single family residences
springing up in their neighbor-
hood.
The Mendota Heights City
Council voted unanimously on
- -March 1 to approve the final plan
for Bream Builders to construct
Victoria Highlands, a 37 -acre
development at the northeast cor-
ner of Marie and Victoria.
Howard Bream plans to devel-
op 38 single family lots on the
northern part of the parcel, which
is adjacent to the existing South
Ridge single family development.
On the southern portion of the
property along Marie Avenue will
be room for 32 townhomes.
Construction on the Victoria
Highlands is expected to begin
Sincerely,
qiteZal /4
Cynthia F. 1.1 ot:pachi
this spring, with occupancy in the
fall, Bream said.
Bream was seeking council
approval last Tuesday for the 10-
acre townhomes portion of the
development, since the plan for
the single- family area had been
granted previously.
Plans call for three two -unit
and nine three -unit townhome
buildings. A homeowners associa-
tion will be in charge of maintain-
ing the common areas and private
driveway leading to the resi-
dences. The first seven town-
homes buildings will be part of
Phase I development, according to
Jim Hill, a consultant for Bream.
All of the units will have fire-
places and cedar exteriors. Some
will have lofts and skylights.
Prices will range from $225,000 to
$300,000.
;,h:.rirperson, Flannin_' Commission
,umbers of the Planning Couunission
Eagan City Council Members
Mayor Vic Ellison
Re: P blic Hearing for the Asp Construction - Crystal Ponds
Preliminary Plat of 13.7 R -4 acres for 137 apartment units
Location: T -27N, R -23 W - Located south cf Hwy 55 in the
N 1 /2 of Suction 12.
On February 27, 1;%88 we .net with representatives of Asp Construction Co,upany
to 1:ok at pictures and drawings of their proposed construction. We would like
to share with you some of our concerns;
fhe proposed plan, we feel, will result in over use of the land.
Green grassy areas will soon be worn down to dirt for lack of
enaigh open, space and green area.
Wood, alurninim or vinyl uidin:gs will not have per.nanent beauty nor
the asthetic value of brick. Brick is virt,,ally rnaintenence free
therefore we, the neikhbors, will not have to worry about the area
taking on a r.n dowry deteriorated look 10 to 15 years down the road.
We urge the city to insist on all brick exteriors not only on these
proposed units but on all future multi dwelling units through out the
City.
We are concerned that children who live in the units will take short
cuts through the yards of adjacent home owners in order to reach
Burr C:rks Park and the homes of their friends in other parts of the
neihbcrhood. We Propose Asp Constriction should put a fence around
their boundries that are adjacent to private property on Chappel Lane
and the West boundary facing Selmark and Harvey Additions. In addition,
we propose a double row of pine trees along the above boundaries to
provide a visual shield and a natural buffer between the multi dwelling
complex and current single family dwellings.
While the current laws require buildings to be situated 50 feet from
the lot line it should be noted that homey in Selman-: addition are
only 35 feet frcm their back yard boundaries. The thought of having
large multi dwelling units located 60 feet from onus back door is
unpleasant to say the least. In this kind of situation we would ask
the city to ask the construction company to keeps itrs buildings
100 feet away from existing single family dwellings.
While we feel the above referred to property should have never been zoned
R -4 in the first place, we ask that as our representatives you would do
everything in your power to see that Crystal Ponds become a Q!ALITY
development with as little adverse effect on current single family dwellings
and their values as possible. Once Asp Construction has made their profits
they will go back to North Dakota but we plan to live in our horse well into
cur "golden years °. Eagan is our house.
Respectfully,
Lowell and Kathleen Bahrke
Leanne, John, Jeffrey and Jason
/ t
) 7 c.__/ /C- CCJ
s
L
llie c' /)/, . c /��'rf'T _.S
/ // �oL /16'r /7,2'Lf , 0-' .
cio
L
C l' n L" C� C� �J c cJ �� 7-- i J�.1 (
/r e C , 7L- y lc,7 ? Cy /7 --, v' /1�f'
�7�F /? % �; .` L � (� %)7(- /r)c
f cl J cv c�S l I r' 4'0 ' a- %'t o
/ (Y�J; �L C / k 7
•
�S n �a • eA;r;i "ty"'�`ry
Le
G
1
(JD
„
WOO 1-1
-st
.( • t) :) 1;: C
WO.
I• .s•
(--
•t
se,
r F
•
•
—
9
/
1
• 13:::;. ,
0
0
' 1 7 4 :/
1. ii. I II
.1
if) rii;;;. 1 It
i , f, U
tt
!.■1 ' ' t, r'T 1 ,
..,
. lo t t 1 Y .. - L - 1:•.• ,
A '•••• p....,_,
•-4 \WA. k 1 .1 '
oi 1 ii`i " i
o i• 1 W ti c
rill ii) X
_.,
1
d ,;, 1 1
ui
? 4:4
1 i i, lo4, ?1,
ul
1 1 1 1 ' V . '!4
' 0 ' tr.;■1 'y' 4 . A . 'S:06 1$
i VI ■'i ili' I 1/
.-'3, ., q.ip 4 ‘; .,i, ,
1 0 ■•• . ■ - i'.•: - '2, — I - : 0
il3'4M
Vj - •_• 4 .E» 4 ; - z i _ ,,," 1 ,L%, . .
.---■••••■■.:1—.
c`i7
z
v
1 1, 1 c
-- ..1‘.,. ,c3,
(9.-- , -,),--.29(CLC:.‘, — ---- ---- — I I
. -- .,,
.----• ,__, , I , I r:4-
q•E. ,,, ' fi). 1 ,--• 1--
01 !4 i
s, ■ •----- 0
', ,- 1 L '
ti I ....L..7.....,,,
I C:
, •z,
L,
6
--
' t ;
u 1
•
sl •
;( • ).N
3.-
••■• 3 IV
•••
;
t
2 IAA
1
TO: n\
CITY COUNCIL '2:E:`::`E•RS 3-1L—F.8
CHAIR:—:AN, PLANNING CCMIiISSICN
PLANNING CO:•;;:ISSICN MA; PERS
REGARDING THURSDAY : :ARCH 24TH HEARING TO CONSIDER PRELIMINARY FLAT OF
15.7 R -4 (I•:tiLTIFLE) ZONED ACRES FOR 137 APARTEENTS UNITS LOCATED SOUTH
UI H■v;Y 55 IN THE N 1 01 SECTION 12.
e are unable to attend this hearing and wish to express our suggestions
to make this development more acceptable.
They are as follows:
1.Solid redwood fence must be installed on the South side to
discourage traffic across private property and provide more
privacy.
2. Pine tree screening should be planted now so that a natural
screen will eventually provide a more aesthetic barrier between
R -1 and R -4 residences.
3. Euildings 3 - 4 - 5 and possibly 2 should be removed and that
living space be expanded in buildings 9 - 10 - 11 - 12 . Ly so
doing, the developer can maintain adequate density. ruildings
2 - 3 - 4 - 5 are far to close (some are within 30 ft. of property
line) and are much higher than R - 1 dwellings.
4. All buildings should have brick exterior. This will insure better
looking apartments than we have experienced in the past in this
neighborhood.
>Ne have a had situation with R - 4 zoning abutting R - 1 zoning. This
requires inovative planning to avoid the devaluation of property and the
disruption of the R - T neighborhood.
Your care, concern firm action in this matter will be greatly
appreciated.
Since1'ly
/L
Lon Chal ^dune
575 Chapel Lane
Eagan Ln. 55121
Gerry Ch pdelain
March 24, 1988
22. No lighting shall be allowed for the tennis courts.
23. The concerns of the Soil, Water and Conservation District
herein shall be addressed.
24. Variances for 60 foot setbacks from the east -west road
shall be allowed.
25. The following general criteria shall be addressed in the
final grading, drainage and erosion control plan:
a. Several areas that have storm water drainage directed
off -site will require more than a silt fence as perimeter control.
More details need to be provided about the retaining walls proposed
throughout the site. Timing of retaining wall construction also
should be addressed.
b. Sediment basin specifications need to be provided on
the plan and preliminary construction schedules that reflect when
trapping measure will be installed.
c. The plan does not specify how storm water will outlet
from the storm water pond along Diffley Road. If this enters a
ditch outlet system the adequacy of the conveyance system needs to
be analyzed.
d. If filling or other construction activity ventures
below the water level in a pond, then a floatable silt curtain needs
to be used and specified on the plan.
e. All anticipated ingress and egress points should be
shown on the plan.
f. A contract person needs to be identified on the plan
who will handle erosion control questions. Note #10 on the plan
indicates home builders will be responsible during the building
phase. Since this is not in keeping with Eagan's guidelines, the
note should be removed from the plan.
All voted yes.
CRYSTAL PONDS ADDITION - PRELIMINARY PLAT & VARIANCE
The next public hearing convened by Mr. Pawlenty was in regard
to the applications of Asp Construction of a preliminary plat of
13.7 R -4 (Multiple) zoned acres for 137 apartment units and a
variance for cul -de -sacs in excess of 500 feet located south of
Highway #55 in the north half of Section 12. Mr. Sturm indicated
the property had been zoned R -4 in about 1971 or 1973. The proposal
would consist of two lots with private streets and long cul -de -sacs,
14
:: i,1ULCS
March 24, 1988
the longest being approximately 700 feet. Asp Construction was
experienced in Eagan, having constructed the Royal Oaks Apartments.
However, these apartments would be of the two -story in front, three -
story in back nature to conform to the existing grades.
Mr. Pawlenty noted that staff had requested that two conditions
be added to the staff report. No. 8, the waterwell to be properly
abandoned pursuant to state guidelines. No. 9, the septic tank will
be properly abandoned.
Mr. Richard Asp, President of Asp Construction of Fargo, North
Dakota, was present to describe the project which would be
completely different from the Royal Oaks project with smaller
buildings and plans to fit the existing slopes. The community
building and pool will be located towards the entrance of the
project which would consist of four phases within a year. There
would be different styles of buildings within the project to
accommodate the 65 foot grade differential. Exteriors would consist
of low maintenance vinyl of blue -grey color with white trim.
Mr. Dick Schindeldecker of 616 Sally Circle suggested that the
density was actually approximately 13 units per acre without the
pond, which was too dense in consideration of the R -1 property
surrounding the proposal. He was also concerned about the lack of
access to Bur Oak Park for any children in the area and
responsibility for the water quality of the pond. He suggested that
the units might be too near the high water mark and that a fence
should also be provided along the west border. It was noted that
the turning radius within the cul -de -sac was 45 feet which should
accommodate emergency vehicles.
Mr. Dwight Larson of 3225 Random Road, suggested that traffic
will increase dramatically on Random Road and that a stub street
within the proposal would allow for future apartments to the
property on the west.
Mr. Roger Lindstrom, 617 Sally Circle expressed concern with the
high density use near single family homes. Mr. Lowell Bahrke of 618
Sally Circle questioned the number of apartment units needed in
Eagan and described the access to Highway #55 as extremely
dangerous. He assumed that the private streets would not be wide
enough to facilitate parking and adequate emergency access.
Mr. Foertsch advised that the lift station was adequately sized
to handle the runoff. Ms. Kathy Bahrke complained that the Dodd
Road townhomes were not owner - occupied and a blight to the
neighborhood due to the deterioration, weeds, garbage, crime and
transients. She felt that the apartments would create another
similar area surrounding the property. She also recommended that
the vinyl exterior should be upgraded with brick.
linuLes
March 24, 1988
Mr. Vern Schaaf of 520 Chapel Lane stated that the site doesn't
lend itself to apartments with children without access to the park.
He also indicated the traffic on Highway #55 would be approaching
speeds of 50 to 55 miles per hour at the access point, creating a
very dangerous situation.
Mr. Jerry Groth of 642 Rita Court suggested that the south and
west sides of the project be fenced. Sharon Manninen of 624 Sally
Circle indicated that the residents had objected to multiple
development in Bur Oaks which had resulted in $150,000.00 single
family homes. She was concerned about children being bused to
different schools due to the over - population in the area and had
called the DNR in regard to environmental assessment of the pond.
Gail Ahlberg of 565 Chapel Lane requested that the fence be of
wood construction and stated that the parcel was a crummy piece of
land to begin with.
Mr. Mike Holey of 3220 Random Road indicated that Bur Oak Park
is a swamp with a swing set and not a safe place for children to
play.
Lynn Larson of 3225 Random Road expressed concern in regard to
the safety of the children and stated that the park was not safe
which resulted in play in the streets. She suggested that a ball
field be installed on the project. She indicated that her son in
the 3rd grade has been switched to a different elementary school
three times.
Mr. Will Kolesar, 585 Chapel Lane, advised that children would
run through his yard and requested a wood fence and stated that a
three -story building would tower over his backyard. -
Ms. Kathy Brazeau, 3239 Random Road, stated that the present
townhome children pick on the children from the single family homes
as would the apartment dwelling children.
Mr. Bill Klotzbach, 603. Chapel_ Lane, suggested that kids will
cross private property and that the density was too high for that
area.
Mr. Mary Post, 2858 Sibley Hills Drive, indicated that his
sister owned the 137 foot wide strip of property to the west of the
project. He questioned whether the stub would be constructed on the
proposed project providing access to that parcel. The son of the
owner of the parcel to the west, also appeared and questioned
whether a traffic study had been done, which Mr. Foertsch indicated
had not.
APc iiinutes
March 24, 1988
Claudia Crawford, 615 Sally Circle, suggested that the westerly
parcel would eventually be sold to Asp and developed as apartments
also.
Mr. Ron Haft of Inver Grove Heights, indicated his mother owned
the strip to the west of the proposal and suggested that the City
had turned down the previous developer for lack of an adequate
street. In his opinion, two accesses should be provided to the
development with that much population.
Mr. Stan Piekarski, 3350 Highway #55 indicated he had been a
resident for 35 years and that in his opinion, it was very dangerous
to try to access onto Highway #55. Mr. Asp responded indicating
that there would be no parking on the private streets with 2 1/2
spaces already provided for each unit. He suggested that there was
adequate area for snow removal, noting that the pond was available.
He agreed that the fence on the south could be wood and that a fence
could be constructed to the west side of the project. He also
stated that he had no control over ownership or use of the strip of
property immediately to the west of the proposed project.
Member Voracek questioned why the variance was required for
private cul -de -sacs and Mr. Sturm indicated that where there are
several residents accessing the street, whether private or public,
the variance is required.
Mr. Miller asked the developer if site plans could be provided
indicating the elevation from the south. Member Wilkins questioned
whether the staff report indicating 10 units per acre was gross. or
net. It was indicated that the pond was included in the figures and
that Code allowed 12 to 16 units per acre gross.
Member Wilkins was advised that the parcel to the west was also
zoned R -4 and the property to the east was zoned GB with a
landscaping company already in occupation. The developer offered to
improve the landscaping and screening to the west pursuant to the
inquiries of member Miller. Staff explained why the cul -de -sacs
could not be connected through the depression on the proposal.
Mr. Voracek suggested that there were too many units with only
one access and that Highway #55 was indeed a problem for safe
access.
Voracek moved,_ Miller seconded the motion to recommend denial of
the preliminary plat, based upon the dangerous access to Highway
#55, the lack of more than one access for the large number of units,
lack of access to the park, for children in the project and the use
is too dense in light of the surrounding single family homes.
Chairman Pawlenty noted that the zoning was approved long ago by
prior City Council and the developer has certain rights to develop
but the City can require such issues such as access, safety and
environmental concerns be addressed prior to approving a preliminary
plat. All voted affirmatively.
17 ���
Agenda Information Memo
April 19, 1988, City Council Meeting
COMPREHENSIVE GUIDE PLAN AMENDMENT /PRELIMINARY PLAT
CONDITIONAL USE /TOWN CENTRE 100 - 6TH ADDITION
L. Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment, Town Centre 100 - 6th
Addition, Federal Land Company PD Amendment and Preliminary Plat
is 7.3 LB Zoned Acres Within the Eagan Heights Commercial Park PD
to a CSC and Conditional Use Permit to Allow a Daycare Facility- -
A public hearing was held by the Advisory Planning Commission at
their last regular meeting held on March 24 to consider separate
applications for 1) an amendment to Eagan Heights Commercial Park
PD to allow a transfer of existing uses within that PD, 2) a
preliminary plat for the Town Centre 100 6th Addition, 3) a
conditional use permit for a daycare facility in a CSC district.
The APC is recommending denial of both the Comprehensive Guide
Plan amendment and zoning application.
For a copy of the,Planning and Engineering Department report,
refer to pages 2-_--2,3 through ��
For a copy o APC action on this item, refer to pages ,04?
through ,�
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the
Comprehensive Guide Plan amendment, preliminary plat and
conditional use permit for a daycare facility in a CSC.
? 33
CITY OF EAGAN
SUBJECT: COMPREHENSIVE GUIDE PLAN AMENDMENT, PLANNED
DEVELOPMENT AMENDMENT, PRELIMINARY PLAT, AND
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (TOWN CENTRE 100 6TH ADDITION)
APPLICANT: FEDERAL LAND COMPANY
LOCATION: PART OF THE N 1/2 SECTION 15
EXISTING ZONING: PP ( EAGAN HEIGHTS COMMERCIAL PARK) 82 -2
DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: MARCH 24, 1988
DATE OF REPORT: MARCH 17, 1988
REPORTED BY: PLANNING AND ENGINEERING DEPARTMENTS
APPLICATION:
Separate applications have been submitted requesting an Amendment (Rezoning)
within the Eagan Heights Commercial Park Planned Development to allow a
transfer of existing uses within that PD and a Preliminary Plat for the Town
Centre 100 6th Addition. This plat, located on Outlot B of the first
addition, would contain a 69,900 SF retail area on four lots and 7.98 acres of
that Outlot. The remaining area would remain a LB (Limited Business) use.
The Conditional Use Permit is for a day care facility in a CSC (Community
Shopping Center) district.
LAND USE:
In 1982, Federal Land originally started the Planned Development process for
the Eagan Heights Commercial Park. From 1982 through the signing of the
Planned Development Agreement in 1985, some changes have occurred. The Land
Use Plan designating uses in the Agreement is attached with this report. The
applicants are proposing to change Parcel 8, a portion of the Limited Business
with Parcel 4, the CSC use designation. In reviewing the overall Planned
Development, it appears that the uses from the CSC up in the NW corner across
the northerly portion of the site are the heavier commercial uses within the
Planned Development. The southerly portion of the development adjacent to the
Forest Ridge Apartments, Duckwood Estates, and O'Leary Park are the lesser
intense land uses. The applicants are proposing to designate Parcel 4 LB. To
the west would be a CSC use and to the east would be a General Business use.
Limited Business or Office Use would be between the two higher intensity uses.
The proposed change of the Limited Business Parcel 8 would now consist of
approximately one -half CSC with the remaining half as Limited Business. The
CSC would be at the corner of Denmark and Town Centre Drive. To the west is
the existing Town Centre shopping center which is only partially complete.
Instead of reviewing modifications or changes within the Land Use, the
question should be, "Does additional retail commercial fit in the area of
Denmark and Town Centre Drive ?" In review of Parcel 4 where the commercial
would be transferred, from a planning perspective it makes more sense to
retain the CSC uses because of the compatibility of the adjacent two parcels.
X3 4
In review of the overall Planned Development and use designations, there
appears to be ample and adequate uses which would fit within each of the
categories listed such as Parcel 1. CSC uses also allow office and bank uses
already permitted on that parcel. Therefore, trading some of the Land Uses on
existing parcels really does not make sense given the parameters of this
Planned Development.
SITE PLAN
This site is served by four curb cuts that line up with those of adjacent
properties. Each building would be located on a separate lot but they would
be connected by a common "canopy" roofline. All building and parking setbacks
meet code requirements if the building is considered a single structure. If
not, code would require that the walls be 20' apart. Staff feels that the
buildings should be considered as one structure since the architectural
treatment will be consistent on all of them.
The proposed building is a single story tall except in the northwest corner
where a second story has been provided. It would be constructed out of
concrete block and stucco in a single phase. Staff recommends a uniform
signage package plan for overall consistency.
A day care facility is proposed in the southern 5,000 SF of the 19,000 SF
"building 1." Other users are undetermined but proposed as "specialty use"
type shops. Two loading bays are proposed behind buildings 2 and 4. All
other service will be provided through doors on the back side of the
buildings. Cross easements will be necessary to provide public access with
adequate parking for the strip center. Each building /lot ratio is within the
code requirement of 30% and the total coverage on all four lots is 20 %.
Based on the most strict CSC code requirement, 382 parking stalls are
necessary. 393 10' -wide stalls have been provided. Staff recommends
extending curb lines where striping is shown to better define parking /aisle
areas.
A landscape plan was submitted only showing deciduous overstory trees along
the property lines. Staff is confident that a final plan consistent with
other CSC uses would be prepared with the final plat submission. Special
emphasis should be placed on the berming along the streets and screening the
rear of the building from the different adjacent land use. There are areas
with more than 40' of concrete between the building and parking lot. Either
large, moveable, permanent planters or overstory trees planted in steel grates
would visually soften that large hard edge area.
GRADING /DRAINAGE /EROSION CONTROL: Preliminary site grading was
completed last Fall under an approved grading plan. Erosion
control measures were successfully implemented at that time to
protect adjacent properties and limit sediment transport offsite.
Before additional site grading can continue, repair and
maintenance of the existing erosion and sediment control measures
is required.
The proposed internal storm sewer system will need to be revised.
The proposed storm sewer connection to the existing public system
at the intersection of Denmark Avenue and Town Centre Drive will
not be allowed. The existing storm sewer in the location of the
proposed connection does not have adequate capacity to
accommodate the site runoff. All site runoff is required to
drain to Pond DP -23.
UTILITIES: Sanitary sewer service of sufficient depth and
capacity to serve the site has been provided to the property in
three locations and in one location the Development is proposing
to connect to the existing line in Denmark Avenue.
Water main service of sufficient capacity and pressure is readily
available in Town Centre Drive and Denmark Avenue and has been
stubbed to the property line in locations conducive to site
development. The proposed water main system provides the
adequate number of fire hydrants to meet City fire demand
requirements, but inadequate water main looping is proposed.
Proper looping of the water main system will be required of the
Development.
STREETS /ACCESS /CIRCULATION: Public street access is readily
available on three sides of the proposed Development. Access to
the site is proposed in five different locations. Access to the
site properly located in locations opposite existing curb cuts
where possible.
EASEMENTS /RIGHT -OF - /PERMITS: Cross easements will be
required for the pl;;.;sed parking lot traffic to insure that - each
platted parcel access to public right -of -way. The
Development will be required to provide appropriate easements for
all public utiliti.+s constructed outside of public right -of -way
which serve more than one potential user.
Sufficient right -of -way for Denmark Avenue and Town Centre Drive
were provided for with the original platting of the Town Centre
70 and Town Centre 100 Developments.
All regulatory agency permits shall be acquired within the
appropriate time frame as required by the effect agency.
ASSESSMENTS: In accordance with special assessment policies in
effect at the time of the final assessment hearing, the following
assessments have been levied.
2:b(0
PROJECT NUMBER DESCRIPTION
58 Sanitary Sewer Trunk
58 Water Trunk
58 Water Availability Charge
58/429 Lateral Benefit Trunk Water Main
429 Lateral Benefit Trunk Sanitary
Sewer
Waiver Storm Sewer Trunk
429 Streets - Denmark Avenue
City records show the following pending assessments of record:
PROJ # DESCRIPTION
RATE QUANTITY AMOUNT
443 Ponding Easement $3,832.31/Ac. 27.5Ac. $105,388
512 Street Lights 23,193
TOTAL PENDING ASSESSMENTS $128,581
In accordance with special assessment policies in effect at this
time, the following assessment is proposed as a condition of
final plat approval:
PROJ # DESCRIPTION RATE QUANTITY AMOUNT
429 Storm Sewer Lateral $1,177 /Ac. 7.98 Ac. $ 9,392
TOTAL PROPOSED ASSESSMENT $ 9,392
All final assessment obligations will be calculated based on the
quantities and dimensions of the final plat and in accordance
with the rates in effect at the time of the final plat approval.
CONDITIONS: TOWN CENTRE 100 SIXTH ADDITION
1. These standard conditions of plat approval as adopted by
Council action on September 15, 1987 shall be complied with:
Al, Bl, B2, B4, C2, C4, D1, El, F1, and Gl.
2. An updated planned development land use plan that incorporates
the reconfiguration of the road layout shall be submitted to the
City.
3. All trash shall be contained within the building.
4. A maintenance agreement and cross easements shall be reviewed
by the City Attorney's office.
5. An overall signage package shall be submitted and all signage
shall conform to the Town Centre sign agreement unless specific
fariances are requested. All signage shall be subject to the one-
time sign fee of $2.50 /SF.
6. The loading bays shall be suitably screened.
7. Rooftop mechanical equipment shall be suitably screened.
8. All four sides of the building shall be constructed with the same
material.
9. All site runoff is required to drain to Pond DP -23. Appropriate
water main looping is required.
A. Assessments
STANDARD CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL
1. This development shall accept its additional assessment
obligations as defined in the staff's report in
accordance with the final plat dimensions and the rates
in effect at the time of final plat approval.
B. Easements and Rights -of -Way
1. This development shall dedicate 10' drainage and utility
easements centered over all common lot lines and adjacent
to private property or public right -of -way.
2. This development shall dedicate, provide, or financially
guarantee its proportionate share of the acquisition
costs of additional drainage, ponding, and utility
easements as required by the alignment, depth, and
storage capacity of all required public utilities and
streets located beyond the boundaries of this plat or
outside of dedicated public right -of -way as necessary to
service this development.
3. This development shall dedicate all public right -of -way
and temporary slope easements for ultimate development of
adjacent roadways as required by the appropriate
jurisdictional agency.
4. This development shall dedicate adequate drainage and
ponding easements to incorporate the required high water
elevation necessitated by City storm water storage volume
requirements.
C. Plans and Specifications
1. All public streets and utilities necessary to provide
service to this development shall be designed by a
registered professional engineer in accordance with City
codes and engineering standards and policies, and
approved by staff prior to final plat approval.
2. A detailed grading, drainage, erosion, and sediment
control plan must be prepared in accordance with current
City standards and approved by staff prior to final plat
approval.
3. This development shall insure that all temporary dead end
public streets shall have a cul -de -sac constructed in
accordance with City engineering standards.
4. A detailed landscape plan shall be submitted on the
proposed grading plan and approved by staff prior to the
final plat approval. The financial guarantee shall be
included in the Development Contract and not released
until one year after the date of installation.
r)9
STANDARD CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL
PAGE TWO
5. All internal public and private streets shall be
constructed within the required right -of -way in
accordance with City design standards.
D. Public Improvements
1 . I f any public improvements are to be installed under a
City contract, the appropriate project must be approved
by Council action prior to final plat approval.
E. Permits
Revised:
1. This development shall be responsible for the acquisition
of all regulatory agency permits in the time frame
required by the affected agency.
F. Parks Dedication
1. This development shall fulfull its parks dedication
requirements as recommended by the Advisory Parks and
Recreation Commission and approved by Council action.
G. Other
1. All standard platting and zoning conditions shall be
adhered to unless specifically granted a variance by
Council action.
Approved:
LTS #2
STANDARD
Advisory Planning Commission City Council
Augu.= :3, 1987 September 15, 1987
• $ '
V 2/ EAR,' P■uarc
1 . , l',-j '71
' ...... I
■ .'
6 ------ e" -1
CP 4' / . ..
.L r5T. ' P ' , I- OI Q. . '.:' ' CI - A 1 .
/ . U ‘, ....- ,, _ ____,' .....5.1.5,...,.. ETC .5 T S ,
, 5. `
1 ‘' - ''- '-- N il ‘ „! ;.7.2- , . -- "'1'., .:-4 ._,' - _C..:- ,',..;'y -.:.; ' ,,, ,ij- - L i
,,,,
___-'' .E.,..,;-... "'"-='------ -----T ';'-' '-7 ---;':1.4; C;------ ' 7 ------ r,., -' , ' •'-:::7 1 .
./ --.
L T ..... - 4 ,..5 1
t-■
rfoe cr.r ION • " - .
• ••••■•• 1
CO " •• -
I 1
LB
,
?D /
5 -2 E / \
7 1 /
/
PLOT KNOB
_ i RE ,
CENTE4 .,7t--"=4°°C
-:-.
,- l
., i ' , tate %NO
,,- , ,i,,, t„
gn
et-
r —
! 4_ ' FZS A T V I:TOGE rii. ,- U t7 l!i '•I
//, __, ' / 0-- ,
1 „
; ----- , :=1_ ,,. .. -"- : c.
o! C-71
_
i 6 2 : L Pr 1 r_Th --:•ly'r I
--,5
/i
V ' DOODLE i
-
POLO
, .." ,— . - E - ..
UN v."\'',' P ,.2), ...A,c, .,.-
.,...v ,....
........ TZ
; —
2i
1
6th •
zu
Ft •
:2,E .C4D
CARRIAGe !
HILLS 0001i
29
T OW RIC
A 150IT 1044,
TTr
L tit%
CARRIAGE
HILLS
GOLF
COURSE
! !
1
1
A
5
)
',CA-0 EN WARK
AVENU , -1
— ;:;;;;;F
II
--w
;.!
ij
ttt I. co
1/17
(
'\ / '
/ ,„,--'"
1 (
\ /
(
0
z
m
/ 4
•
r
;.
11
I !
\ t
Y
�e
E
•
m>
rn
0
Z
m
0
0
40 1
t..x .•••y )
1 3
3
3
a
:,
as04 a
r >
L ( .lU TO 1.1
a
vi
a
a
v
a
0
0
AVLru1. ---
1
0
b
O
0
•
3
w
(C.UUiT (M. -140 V
4 . • t l r_
-4.....• ,.....� t 1 .
H
w
m c)
. � —.
1 n
J
O ici‘
o>
a 0 m
5 D•
� • Z
n
0
i
m O
D
0
0
• Z
m
N
Z
m
N • m
m
m
✓
O
M
z
J4
K.OT- KNOBHOAn 1 C A? 3-I F�'�'� � r
CI , I,
b 0 -'V-� ENrxM A1r_1. u}= _ .. �•,,.., r r\ _ ' �.-,
^ _ ..+ --' .!!t f P y fi �,
a n �
1 h 8
a • . m
1
h z ° le
1,' e
0
?' n
y.
k
0 1 \ '\ GN
Nil
in o
ON -AVENU ( CO RO. NO. 43)
Diu( \ r
r:
g f a M 11§LiM
w„ •
0
Denmark Ave.
TOWN CENTER SHOPPES
E•Qon lAnntoot•
TOWN CENTER SHOPPES
rni
rr
AVENUC
---": --3---- .---.? — AiA-- _ D_ _ E N M ARK
i
:1: 6
)
2
CP-3
841. 9
'850.5
.N
....."/
, CP-5 j -, 74 ? / i i
c
1 ! .;....
875.9 1
1 - c t
/
874 .8
C , i - J w 7 L518 . /
- Y.
, :..:'•;.:..1'
‘
r_
7 cl:Firj_EY 7 -
i A 0V.-- 7, ,:l
1 _----__::.,-;"----="---; 01 "- - " /
------==. ,.1
2 riC1
7 i • ' 14
/ -
4/
dit .
• i
1 77 .---871
, 844.0
_
6 4 - 2i 8
city of eagan
PUBLIC
WORKS
DEPARTMENT
■
1
DR-27
: 874.6
• 878.0
.
8° 6
fr
- Lc,
P ' L d P 6'4 '
r-
890.0 L4.1
!87
• DP-4
L
;/
4.8
I b
p LD -5 3
880.0
CENTER C■b` •
, • . ' rDP- 25
" -•
686 4
. 892.0
/ / / 844.0 -- t. ; i D ' Li ' 7 r i ,),;- P -6 „i . 4., 4 =.. ) P -45
2
. ilD IMIIIIIIMM OM
; jp
. 1-
""*" '
--.1 t • I r L.. ---'"
ii tirt_LS II-44,n I.:. , . L: --" .--■ _ - "...\
0
oi 895.5 .0_
c v
TO- _L. _
L..-
12' i
"I
2 4" : s " $11:4-4:-.----1
8/ 6_ 5 ""
r ,
■1 I-- a-3...1 4 IN • . ,... N .... ? .-- •
JP-
5 '• 1 - I
-823.8 ,:i.. .: _i :•"-. V'
y;,,-, E-:[---------2- ----,-------
J-
- -,-_-;-:.; P10
'.ti __ • // : 820.8
Y 830.0
l
JP
818.9
6300
84:4.0
-- •N' •
--•
•••
"1
Jr ;49 !
884.5
■'
DP 1
857.3:
866.5;
838.31
STORM SEWER
MASTER PLAN
1 1
DP-20 .. D-r ---
1 \
,860.t
901.0 \\
904.2
f ----- 7
rs.) _
1
'O'LEARY PARK, 882.2
P
i
JP-1 I
815.7
830.0
•
DP-3
SUBJECT PARCEL
JP-63
L 899.7
: JP
- 890.7
- 895.7
:,• T T
•
, .
approved:
DF
8E
86
J- g
FIG#1
standaro
plate 4:
4
March 24, 1988
TOWN CENTRE 100 6TH ADDITION - COMPREHENSIVE GUIDE PLAN AMENDMENT
PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AMENDMENT - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
AND PRELIMINARY PLAT
Chairman Pawlenty convened the public hearing in regard to the
applications of Federal Land Company for Comprehensive Guide Plan
amendment, a Planned Development amendment (rezoning), a preliminary
plat of 7.3 LB (Limited Business) zoned acres within the Eagan
Heights Commercial Park PD, to a CSC (Community Shopping Center)
district, and a conditional use permit to allow a day care facility
in that district located south of Town Centre Drive along Duckwood
Drive in the north half of Section 15. Assistant City Planner Sturm
described the proposed shift of uses of existing designated CSC
areas for the LB area. He noted concern in regard to the lack of
green space which the developer had indicated a willingness to
address.
Mr. Martin Colon, a partner in Federal Land Company, appeared
and indicated that an additional office area east of the 10 -story
building makes more sense than retail. He suggested that O'Leary
Road represent a natural cutoff from the General Business district
to the east but which the developer tentatively proposed to "soften"
the commercial development in the GB area.
The proposal at the southeast intersection of Town Centre Road
and Denmark Avenue was for a 4 -part center with a 20,000 square
foot, two -story building for the Treasure Island children's
furniture as the main focal point. A day care center was proposed
for the southern portion and an office supply and restaurant also.
Submittals had been made to the MPCA including the ISP permit.
Mr. Colon indicated that their traffic engineer suggested that the
retail use would have less traffic impact on Denmark, Town Centre
Drive and Yankee Doodle Road than an office use at peak hours. The
driveways were lined up with existing driveways on opposite sides of
the street. Two pylon signs were requested and located near the
buildings.
Dr. Don Clark, 673 Farm Road, who offices in the Town Centre
Professional Bldg. immediately to the north, expressed concern in
regard to yet another strip center in this immediate area. He noted
that he and his partners had moved into their office building from
strip centers relying upon representations that they would be within
an office park area. He also indicated that the intersection of
Town Centre Drive and Denmark represented a very serious traffic
hazard due to the changes of the developer in installing 4 fast -food
restaurants along Town Centre Drive. He then described the number
of strip center -type businesses within close proximity of this area.
ciinuces
March 24, 1988
Mr. Mark Tarrin, a representative of Kid's Kingdom, the child
care center, indicated this would be the sixth center within a
shopping center. The center would be open 7 days a week with normal
day care and drop off day care.
Member Wilkins indicated that the location would be a good place
for a strip center, as opposed to the area east of the 10 -story
office building. She questioned whether the PD Agreement could
restrict certain types of uses within the commercial center such as
those that Dr. Clark was concerned about. Legal counsel advised
that this could be done and the developer agreed to such
restrictions. However, it may be difficult to enforce in the
future.
Member Trygg suggested that the apartments to the south of the
proposed development were as much affected as the ones that the
developer allegedly was protecting further to the east and the
north.
Mr. Tarrin advised member Miller that the hours of operation of
the day care center would be from 6:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. Monday
through Thursday, 6:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. on Sunday, and 6:00 a.m. to
12:00 midnight on Friday and Saturday.
Mr. Pawlenty questioned whether the day care was not allowed by
a conditional use permit in an LB as well as CSC district, which it
was.' Member Voracek indicated - that the use of the GB area was not
an issue and agreed that the intersection at Town Centre and Denmark
was very dangerous. Mr. Voracek indicated that the 10 -story office
building is in a CSC district and that offices could be and would be
built in the balance of the CSC area to the east in order to
preserve the area around the 10- story. Therefore, the City was not
obtaining any benefit by allowing the developer additional retail
area as proposed.
Miller `moved, Voracek seconded the motion to recommend denial of
the Comprehensive Guide Plan amendment. All voted yes except
Wilkins who voted no. The motion was restated for the benefit of
developer's counsel. Legal counsel for the City recommended that
the Advisory Planning Commission act on the zoning in order to
clarify its decision.
Miller moved, Trygg seconded the motion to recommend denial of
the rezoning and PUD amendment. All voted aye except Wilkins who
voted nay. The Commission requested that the minutes reflect the
reasons for the recommendation for denial, including traffic safety,
lack of consideration to City ( "swap" of land uses), the excess
number of strip centers in the area, the land amount of unused
retail areas already in Town Centre 70 and 100, the proximity to
existing residential uses to the south, and the reliance of office
owners and tenants upon the representations of the developer that an
office park was being developed, subject to ratification at the next
meeting. It was noted that a conditional use permit was not
necessary since the plat could not be approved without the rezoning.
Agenda Information Memo
April 19, 1988, City Council Meeting
EAGANDALE CENTER INDUSTRIAL PARK 10TH ADDITION
M. Preliminary Plat for Eagandale Center Industrial Park 10th
Addition, Opus Corporation of 23.61 (LI) Light Industrial Acres
Containing Two Lots, Conditional Use Permits for a Knox Lumber
Facility With Outside Storage on Lot 1, Block 1, and a Pylon Sign
and a Special Permit for a Fence over 6 Feet - -A public hearing
was held by the Advisory Planning Commission at their last
regular meeting held on Tuesday, March 24, 1988, to consider
applications submitted by the Opus Corporation requesting a
preliminary plat for the Eagandale Center Industrial Park 10th
Addition consisting of two lots on 23.61 acres with a Knox Lumber
facility on Lot 1, a conditional use permit for a pylon sign and
a Special Permit for fencing over 6' tall, located north of Lone
Oak Road between Highway I -35E and Lexington Avenue. The
Advisory Planning Commission is recommending approval of these
items. There was a direction by the Planning Commission to
require that the City staff work with the applicant and MnDOT to
resolve the issue of the berm along I -35E prior to the City
Council meeting.
Each City Councilmember has received a letter from Vernon Cole, a
copy is enclosed on pages, �7S a- through ' r3 for your reference.
The Director of Public Works was asked to address this issue. A
response will be enclosed with the Additional Information on
Monday, or stated verbally at the meeting on Tuesday given our
Public Works Director's absence this week due to sick leave.
For a copy of the Planning apd Engineering Departments' report,
refer to pages c )S�N through :))0 .
The Advisory Parks and Recreation Commission met on April 7,
1988, and is recommending that the plat be subject to a cash
dedication requirement consistent with commercial /industrial
property and further that a trail be placed along Lexington
Avenue adjacent to their facility.
For ( a copy of the APC action on this item, refer to page(s)
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the
preliminary plat, conditional use permit and necessary special
permit for a fence for a Knox Lumber facility as requested by the
Opus Corporation.
April 5, 1988
2977 South Lexington Avenue
Eagan, Mn 55121
Councilwoman Pam Mccrea
Eagan City Hall
3830 Pilot Knob Road
Eagan, Mn 55122
Dear Councilwoman McCrea,
Our home is on the south side of the proposed Knox Lumber property.
There is a small holding pond between our properties, this is to hold
the runoff from Lexington Avenue, the Post Office and Carson Pirie
Scott. It is my understanding that there is to be no water from Knox,
however, talking to Bob Worthington of Opus Corporation, we were told
that the water from Knox would be drained into the street
which would end up in the above mentioned small pond. The pond
overflows into a larger pond which lies Southwest of our house, and
our concern is that whichever pond the water flows into it is likely
to cause the flooding of our house as well as the other two houses
south of us on Lexington, one of which we own. With the heavy rain
of last summer the water was up to our driveway and had in fact
flooded the basement of the other two houses.
We also talked with Mike Mueller of the Department of Natural
Resources and were informed that an application has been made by Opus
Corp. to fill in a portion of the larger pond to give Knox more usable
land. If this request is granted it will further reduce the capacity
of the pond and put more of a burden on the existing overflow system
and more chance of flooding'our properties.
We would like the City Concil to study the impact of the extra water
on both ponds and determine who will be responsible for any extra
pipes or pumps needed to handle the water, if the existing facilities
are not adequate.
asp
We are also concerned about the debris that would wash off the lumber
yard and clog the overflow system, who would be responsible for
keeping the drain clear?
We are not against progress but we are strongly opposed to a retail
facility being built in an area zoned light industrial. We feel the
extra noise, traffic and floodlights would make it impossible for
us to enjoy our yard, especially on the weekends.
Yours truly,
Vernon R Cole.
cc ve
to
dg
tw
CITY OF EAGAN
SUBJECT: PRELIMINARY PLAT, CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS, SPECIAL
PERMIT (EAGANDALE CNTR INDUSTRIAL PARK 10TH ADDITION)
APPLICANT: OPUS CORPORATION
LOCATION: SE 1/4 OF SECTION 3
EXISTING ZONING: LI (LIGHT INDUSTRIAL)
DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: MARCH 24, 1988
DATE OF REPORT: MARCH 16, 1988
REPORTED BY: PLANNING AND ENGINEERING DEPARTMENTS
APPLICATION SUMMARY: Separate applications have been submitted requesting a
Preliminary Plat for the Eagandale Center Industrial Park 10th Addition
consisting of two lots on 23.61 acres with a Knox Lumber facility on Lot 1, a
Conditional Use Permit for a pylon sign, and a Special Permit for fencing over
six feet tall located north of Lone Oak Road between Highway 35E and Lexington
Avenue.
At a joint APC and City Council meeting in July 1987, there was discussion of
locating a Knox Lumber on this site. The primary issue was having retail
sales in a LI district. Storage yards, provided that they are suitably
screened, are a permitted use. The recommendation to staff was to process
this proposal as a conditional use to allow retail lumber and related building
material sales in a LI district rather than rezoning the site. Careful site
planning and screening of the storage area would be required for an approval
on this specific location due to adjacent single - family homes and the freeway
corridor image.
EXISTING CONDITIONS: Currently the site is undeveloped and dominated by a 6 +-
acre pond near the southern property line. The south and east sides of the
pond are thickly wood'-1 with the rem of the site open grassland. Another
small pond is located_ ,g Lexington Avenue just north of four single - family
homes on agriculturally -ned parcels. Agricultural land including a single -
family home is direct__ :o the north. - The driveway to that home encroaches
onto this site by two :et. The southern portion of the R -1 McKee Addition
and Carson Pirie Scott are on the east side of Lexington Avenue.
SITE PLAN: Lot 1 (9.3 acres) will be developed immediately while Lot 2
(14.3 acres) will be left for future development. A shared driveway will
serve both lots. The drive aisle along the front of the building has been
widened slightly to provide three pick -up parking spaces. The drive aisles
could be reduced to a twenty -four foot width.
The retail building itself is almost 53,000 square feet. Two hundred forty -
four ten - foot -wide parking stalls are required under the most strict
interpretation of the Code (no allowance for office space). Two hundred
thirty -four have been provided. If a shortage should occur, some of the
storage yard could be converted into parking. The proposed amount is
consistent with other similar new facilities in the metro area.
7? 3 41
Total lot coverage is seventeen percent in a thirty -five percent district.
All building and parking setbacks meet Code requirements. Opus is requiring a
ten - foot -tall wooden fence on the southern property line to screen the storage
yard. A similar fence and dense plant material screening will be used to
buffer the residential home on the north side of this lot. In an effort to
promote a quality development and aesthetically pleasing freeway corridor
image, staff recommends connecting the existing berming along Highway 35E at
either the 895 or 896 level so that the storage yard will not be visible from
either the north or southbound lanes. Then a wooden fence would not be
necessary in that area. All outside storage should be kept under twelve feet
in height so it is not visible from the highway. Along the west and south
sides of the warehouse, Knox is proposing a covered storage area that is
fourteen feet tall. The proposed landscaping and berming, if provided, would
shield that area. The landscape plan as proposed reflects recommendations by
staff and the cooperation the developer has shown throughout this rather long
platting process. The landscaping along 35E should not be reduced even if the
berm is extended since it provides the necessary perimeter aesthetics that any
type of development would provide along the highway corridor.
Staff recommends that all of the "optional" grading areas as shown on the
sections be approved since they all add to the visual quality of the project
by screening parking and storage areas.
An interior lighted pylon sign with a maximum height of thirty feet and
approximately one hundred twenty square feet of signage area is proposed near
the center of the storage lot. The thirty- foot height is needed to be
visible from both north and southbound highway lanes. The Council can
determine the height /size of the signage directly adjacent to the freeway
locations without requiring a variance. A ground sign is also proposed at the
entry location.
The "tip -up" style precast concrete panel building will be grey and have a
raked finish. The front of the building will be detailed with brown cedar
siding and have a red mounted sign. The maximum height of the building is
under thirty feet and no rooftop mechanical equipment was shown on the
submitted elevations. Staff is concerned that the parking lot pole lighting
may "spill" off site. Either all pole lighting should be placed on the
perimeter of the parking area and directed inward or cutoffs may be necessary
if a problem occurs.
GRADING /DRAINAGE /EROSION CONTROL: The proposed grading plan
submitted as a part of this application shows grading of Lot 1
entirely and no grading of Lot 2 at this time. The proposed Lot
1 grading shows cut and fill areas of 16' to 4', respectively.
The proposed grading plan shows a finished floor elevation of
approximately 887.5. This proposed finished floor elevation is
"pproximately 2 1/2' higher than the existing elevation of
,exington Avenue at the northeast corner of Lot 1 and
approximately 13 1/2' higher than Lexington Avenue at the
proposed entrance to the development in the southeast corner of
Lot 1. In order to provide a "landing area" for vehicles prior
to entering or leaving the site, a 2% grade has been provided for
the access drive onto Lexington Avenue.
No altering of the storage volume of the small ponding area along
the east side of Lot 2 will be allowed.
The development proposes to collect the storm water runoff
generated by this site in an internal storm sewer system and
convey the runoff to a City installed storm sewer system which
then discharges into Pond DP -12. Pond DP -12 is a ponding area
identified in the City of Eagan Comprehensive Storm Sewer Plan
and is adequately sized to receive direct runoff from this
proposed site.
The northerly adjacent property is designated as tributary to
Pond DP -12. A properly sized storm sewer system to handle the
runoff from the northerly adjacent property will need to be
provided.
No runoff from this site will be allowed into the Pond on the
east side of Lot 2 as this does not have any available outlet.
A preliminary erosion and sediment control plan was submitted as
a part of this application. Two water resource issues were
recognized as a result of proposing to fill a portion of Pond DP-
12. The proposed filling of a portion of Pond DP -12 could result
in sediment movement into the pond during construction. The
appropriate control measure is required to prevent sediment
movement into the pond. The proposed filling can be allowed from
a quantitative standpoint as it relates to the City's
Comprehensive Storm Sewer plan. The filling is subject to
approval by the DNR.
It is important that sediment movement into the pond from site
grading, pond filling and fill slope erosion be minimized to
protect the quality of downstream LeMay Lake.
UTILITIES: Sanitary sewer of sufficient depth and capacity is
presently available along the easterly side of Lexington Avenue.
The development will be required to provide sanitary sewer
service to the proposed lots.
Water main of sufficient capacity and pressure is immediately
available from the existing 16" water main along the westerly
boulevard of Lexington Avenue. The service stubs and hydrant
� S�
locations will be required as necessary to provide adequate fire
protection. The development will be required to provide a water
service to each of the proposed lots.
STREETS /ACCESS /CIRCULATION: Access to the proposed site is
readily available from Lexington Avenue. The development is
proposing a single access point for both proposed Lots 1 and 2.
The Dakota County Plat Commission has reviewed the proposed
preliminary plat and will allow only one access point onto
Lexington Avenue in the location as proposed. No access will be
allowed onto Lone Oak Road. With the divided entrance as
proposed, the egress and ingress entrance widths are required to
be 24' wide each.
EASEMENTS /RIGHTS -OF- WAY /PERMITS: Storm sewer easements will be
required on the internal storm sewer line which provides the
outlet into Pond DP -12.
Water main easements are required on all hydrant lines and lines
which serve more than one potential user.
A ponding easement in accordance with the City of Eagan
Comprehensive Storm Sewer Plan is required for Pond DP -12. The
ponding area along the east side of proposed Lot 2 has to be
preserved in its natural state. A ponding easement is required
until such a time that the drainage area contributing to it is
directed to the southeast to the existing storm sewer at the
intersection of Lone Oak Road and Neil Armstrong Boulevard or a
lift station is constructed to provide the proper outlet.
Dakota County will require a 60' half right -of -way for Lexington
Avenue and a 75' half right -of -way for Lone Oak Road. The County
is requiring dedication of restricted access along the entire
length of Lone Oak Road. The County will also require dedication
of restricted access along Lexington Avenue except for one
opening at the northeast corner of Lot 2 /southeast corner of Lot
1.
This development all be responsible for ensuring that all
regulatory agency `'emits are acquired in the appropriate time
frame as required bl the affected agency.
ASSESSMENTS: The parcels proposed for platting into Eagandale
Center Industrial Park #10 have been levied the following
assessments at the proper rates: sanitary sewer trunk, water
trunk and water availability charge.
There are no pending assessments of record.
The following assessments are proposed in accordance with City of
Eagan special assessment policies as a condition of final plat
approval:
Description Proj. # Rate Qty. Amt.
Storm Sewer Trunk 104 $ .083 /sf 772,473 sf $64,115
Lexington Ave. 111.77 /ff 806.34 ff 90,068
Trailway 13.00 /ff 806.34 ff 10,482
Sanitary Sewer Lateral
Benefit 12 15.85/ff 756.34 ff 11,988
Water Lateral Benefit
from Trunk 12 21.60 /ff 806.34 ff 17,417
TOTAL PROPOSED ASSESSMENT $194,070
The final assessement obligations will be calculated based on the
final plat areas and dimensions and the rates in effect at the
time of the final plat approval.
CONDITIONS: EAGANDALE CENTER INDUSTRIAL PARK #10
1. These standard conditions of plat approval as adopted by
Council action on September 15, 1987 shall be complied with:
Al, Bl, B2, B3, B4, Cl, C2, C4, Dl, El, Fl, and Gl.
2. No exterior sales displays shall be allowed.
3. No exterior loudspeaker advertising shall be allowed.
4. Permanent exterior storage shall be no higher than nine feet.
5. All signage shall be subject to the one -time sign fee of $2.50
per square foot.
6. No rooftop mechanical equipment shall be visible.
7. All permanent cart storage shall be included in the building.
8. All pole lighting shall be directed inward or cut offs shall be
required if off -site spillage occurs.
9. Berming along Highway 35E shall be required, making the storage
yard not visible from north or southbound Highway 35E.
10. No additional runoff into or any reconfiguration of to pond
on the east side of Lot 2 will be allowed.
11. The development will be required to provide sanitary sewer
and water service to each platted lot.
12. The development is responsible for providing the properly
sized water main service and hydrant coverage as required by
fire protection criteria, city codes and engineering
standards.
13. The development will be responsible for providing restricted
access along the entire length of Lone Oak Road and the
entire length along Lexington Avenue except for one access
point along the common lot lines between Lots 1 and 2.
!. I
4 Axe
A. Assessments
STANDARD CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL
1. This development shall accept its additional assessment
obligations as defined in the staff's report in
accordance with the final plat dimensions and the rates
in effect at the time of final plat approval.
B. Easements and Rights -of -Way
1. This development shall dedicate 10' drainage and utility
easements centered over all common lot lines and adjacent
to private property or public right -of -way.
2. This development shall dedicate, provide, or financially
guarantee its proportionate share of the acquisition
costs of additional drainage, ponding, and utility
easements as required by the alignment, depth, and
storage capacity of all required public utilities and
streets located beyond the boundaries of this plat or
outside of dedicated public right -of -way as necessary to
service this development.
3. This development shall dedicate all public right -of -way
and temporary slope easements for ultimate development of
adjacent roadways as required by the appropriate
jurisdictional agency.
4. This development shall dedicate adequate drainage and
ponding easements to incorporate the required high water
elevation necessitated by City storm water storage volume
requirements.
C. Plans and Specifications
1. All public streets and utilities necessary to provide
service to his development shall be designed by a
registered ,. sessional engineer in accordance with City
codes and ._;ineering standards and policies, and
approved by ,:`aff prior to final plat approval.
2. A detailed grading, drainage, erosion, and sediment
control plan must be prepared in accordance with current
City standards and approved by staff prior to final plat
approval.
3. This development shall insure that all temporary dead end
public streets shall have a cul -de -sac constructed in
accordance with City engineering standards.
4. A detailed landscape plan shall be submitted on the
proposed grading plan and approved by staff prior to the
final plat approval. The financial guarantee shall be
included in the Development Contract and not released
until one year after the date of installation.
STANDARD CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL
PAGE TWO
5. All internal public and private streets shall be
constructed within the required right -of -way in
accordance with City design standards.
D. Public Improvements
1 . I f any public improvements are to be installed under a
City contract, the appropriate project must be approved
by Council action prior to final plat approval.
E. Permits
1. This development shall be responsible for the acquisition
of all regulatory agency permits in the time frame
required by the affected agency.
F. Parks Dedication
1. This development shall fulfull its parks dedication
requirements as recommended by the Advisory Parks and
Recreation Commission and approved by Council action.
G. Other
1. All standard platting and zoning conditions shall be
adhered to unless specifically granted a variance by
Council action.
Advisory Planning Commission City Council
Approved: Augu '5, 1987 September 15, 1987
Revised:
LTSn2
STANDARD
• —
ti:›7
19 14'
[`1
e ,
T.
1 •
- -`■ r/2;
•:/
L r •
I :
; •
•
EAGANOALC
SERviCF, _
0., /.
Ind
_. 1
• . 11..4
• Ve
.." "
I: •
SUMMARY DATA
LOCATION:
ZONING:
OCCUPANCY:
CONSTRUCTION TYPE:
LOT AREA:
HOME IMPROVEMENT CENTER
GROSS FLOOR AREA:
WAREHOUSE GROSS
FLOOR AREA:
COVERED STORAGE AREA:
LANDSCAPING:
PARKING:
RETAII;i'
PARKING STALLS REQUIRED:
PARKING STALLS PROVIDED:
STORE HOURS:
date:MARCH 8, 1988
project no. 870119,
SUMMARY DATA
NORTH OF INTERSECTION OF
LEXINGTON AVE & LOAN OAK ROAD
I -1 LIMITED INDUSTRIAL
B -2 — BUILDING MATERIALS,
PLUMBING, ELECTRICAL HEATING AND
HARDWARE SALES
TYPE 11 —N (SPRINKLERED)
RETAIL CENTER AND WAREHOUSE
STRUCTURES
9.321 ACRES, 406,022 FT.
52,851 SQ. FT.
18,38 SQ. FT.
5,647 SQ. FT.
LANDSCAPE AREA REQUIRED:
15% = 60,903 SQ. FT.
LANDSCAPE AREA PROVIDED:
13.5% = 54,915 SQ. FT.
RETAIL FLOOR AREA: 44,483 SQ. FT.
REDUCTION: — 11,870
NET RETAIL FLOOR AREA: 32,613 SQ. FT.
FIRST 20,000 DIVIDED 150 = 133.3
REMAINING 12,615 DIVIDED 200 = 63.1
1185 DIVIDED 150 = 7.9
MON — FRI 7:00 AM to 9:00 PM
SAT 7:00 AM to 6:00 PM
SUN 10:00 AM to 6:00 PM
J
204.3
222.0
N ® LUMBER COMPANY
EAGA N
MINNESOTA
Truman Howell Architects S Assoc., Inc. 620 Mend °_:_ssohn . e_S,a ° I'0 Mots., MN 55427 (612J 541-9777
41 -97 7
E
PRELIMINARY PLAT OF:
EAGANDALE CENTER INDUSTRIAL PARK NO. 10
..
• . r
/ Q( S
V ,9•54'00"E _ -A S2
l ^h!
:
622Apccss \\ -� /
•
- ^ — S o9 . 4n'22 - L J•JJ
2
- 5I
jl
p • I
' ,ter
0
Z
1-I
F
�I
X
WI
�I
A 4 j \ •
-.sa 22'M - 4,,,S.‘10 l ;' ---.......3_,_,...---.......3_,_,...... ---.......3_,_,...... 3_ . \
\ y
� ���\ \.mo Y \'\- '� ` . ` '
LONE OAK -ROAD- - • ' L i SA. H. ''NO.-' 261 -"' ' -- + - -
-- — — — L— —
I ♦u mar. ■ .111.1 •u r.rviIQ Om.
A -0
r
! -r r-•:-.;1
,
4f,P:tti f ,
- '1 ti;i7:t1,!
,e ]
( r )
t
!-- *0*w • Attl
; - , , • • - Lsk , i1.4116 .',
; 3• '
' '
,
ifiNOX LUMBER COMPANY
EAGAN NNCSOTA
_
, 19
0
LONE OAK ROAD
0
o
MCKEE STREET
KEEFE STREET
r=
' a. •
104
mi!,7;`
...
‘, - .
.4,
:010X MBER COMPANY
LU
EAGAN NBNNEBOTA
A l
, . -
.
,-----
0
cn
--.
• - ti •
• ---n?
( fi, •,. ,
, _ _ ... 1 ' ' t
, _i_i_,;,. '1 ...!;_±!•! v ''' A l' . , .• 1 - 1, ,:_', 1- .L-
0
X I
I [ •-•
11: i al
_I _ • • • 1_
1_1111 ._]; 1:1_11:_i
)
1 1‘ 1 ,1 11
LEXINGTON AVE.
7/
133U1S 3433N
1
•L
ss.
■••■..,
EAGANDALE 10TH. ADDITION
GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN
1/4
4 ) - $.
, •
.?
-:....1.; - .
.4,„ .
-, -- --------......' A;
7 - • -... - ---- ---.-•:.....,, i ;:f / / ' ''',:,
- ..„„... ,_..,.„..‘ ,:•- - - :1 '.;
.•.____..„.___
___ , s1 s• i
: I ,
.....,
\
$
•, ' :----..--
'''' - -',._ F''''.::::.".• ::',•• -::•'-_-:-..-,. '; .> -... ,,....; .* , i , i
: LEXINGTON AVE. ' ( CO. RD. 43 )
..--- — — —..— — — '1.7.°::.: I -- .-- —..— — ---. - 7 ; ;T: — --• — : - ?
•- i... ' 41..• —L —.. ...— i..— 2
.
i t-, le , .. •••• : •I 1 !.
- -- z • ---1:11:!•:.
t -......;;•
11■4•1.0. _____ ■••
•-
0 OPUS CORPORATION
C -2I
I 'M 0 X LUMBER COMPANY
.
EAGAN MINNESOTA
‘0471 "..
11
(-•
(3 •
33_
•■••
:4
•
1, t2
r csr
- -
9
2
-
, ..�
.., u .,...
:"..„;/.
I lit !MAN I.
!i
rs\iy �i 'ti
IY�:
_.�
.`
�/�� y
fM1JtON
EAGYN
LUMBER COMPANY
MINNESOTA
LANDSCAPE PLAN
`
I....::-.1•L
_„
...:......s.:
_
r
F
1
t.r
•c
/ I ; t ; •
\ \�i a `I ■
; '; '\.::_:.:t , \�}y�
;
I ry l `......_.
o _ : t
...(1-, t `/ 1. I. "s a te } d.} I I I ■ I._1J L.i , :"' T.:711
r7_, I'I, i, -f l f, 7, - :1 1 1 I 11 1 1 t-I I I i L I. ,:s
�r�
i — -', - I: - i i
$. —
l
LEXINGTON AVE.
s' t17
m
1{1111AN „CP,
1101V11.1.
21
---- tEiONGTON AVE.
I(.NOX LUMBER COMPANY
EAGAN MINNESOTA
>
I
..1.
-
si
TIII IN1AN
I {OW ri 1 A
IVAI
,t‘CA
WS,
•
-...""
qa rw row
aib.111.1161"
EASIAN
LUNSMIR COMPANY
MINNESOTA
'I• il, PI
6101A
TS
+ I
tii t)
-J
'
•
r
UL
'-:. ',Z •
r■
,
■ I
r
im
, 4
A -2
THUM AN
.0Nik
, I.b•t#
:CHOX LUMBER COMPANY
6'0114
.
n.-+A
--. ■
EAGAN MiNNEBOVA
0
0
z
-n
rn
z
m
m
0 •
z
4
8
IA-3 1
TRI:MAN AV.
.5 1 Db
bic.A
y,...
.,........... Lunneesa comP*Ave
1
MINNESOTA
1/4.,
•
m
rn
r-
m
0
cru
4
AD)
-n
l•-■-•■■■■•-.1
NOLLVA313 1S3M ®
NOLLVA313 HILION -0
NOW/Arta HIMS 0
NOLLVATI3 Hinos
PRELIMINARY PLAT OF'
EAGANDALE CENTER INDUSTRIAL PARK NO. 10
N `• 1o7•an 4"OOu
\'.
STORM SEWER TRUNK - 17.73 ACRES
u ♦ 72
'[.
- --.. —. -i — .
...— a -` _-*w ter.rm �..wy. -- • 1 . - -r - - _' I ; • --t�
--,3E 1- 1 `�..
LONE OAK ' . I �
ROAD' -` •—(C SA H . 'N0:" 261 -- - : °1}:..•., - _
I •undr It. nJ ♦ur.r•*ssu ■ue .
EAGANDALE CENTER INDUSTRIAL PARK NO. 10
mnnunnnunmltu
IRA ILWAY — 806.34 F.F
PRELIMINARY PLAT OF:
•
LONE OAK ' ROAD- (C. SA. H. N0: 261
~`j v* LEXINGTON AVENUE STREET IMPROVEMENTS — 806.34
•uudr laud •ears r• Iuy fua
PRELIMINARY PLAT OF:
EAGANDALE CENTER INDUSTRIAL PARK NO. 10
SEWER LATERAL 7567347.F.
WATER LATERAL BENEFIT TRUNK - 806.34 F.F.
- /,
North
Interceptor
- -
N- K r''''' C.' 1 -). r'' ".; ' \ \‘‘
N - M _ \ ", '''.• 1 ___ _
--- - 1 • i , • - : ,/
, . \‘' >
2I .,. G .!,,'. 'f-r- • , P ''
' ' 1 m
/
' I N \ '-'•■;-- -, ', ,
/ N - L'' \--.'• ---- -,
/ ,
•••■■ M.= •••=10. GM!
\
-G
city of eagan
r jr- 0 , 1 PUBLIC
r'V WORKS
DEPARTMENT
..
( :: - , ,:/
:: I /
''\‘ .
N
/
N D 1 - P
•
\ \ , .
„ " — QM, _ __ 4=211MCKES=2:=1=1==.
1
• -, •
N - FF
•
• • / =-\\,
30
0" \'‘,
r
/
....1 L....,_:_-_:_-..- '--/, „Ii \ , •
t:lb, ,JOAL.E. . C.Zti 7E:1
. Jam ..rems 44•Nors •'",: ,
■ \
I ''S
: . 1
I 11 1 i
--- -31.........■ _-.-_ !_•-.- J
AMEND IIMMOI•
S POS
• I
SANITARY SEWER
MASTER PLAN
1 12 ' • P
SUBJECT PARCEL
11
—.7.•••-yr
_ N
el•
FIG#2
standard
p 4f
approved late
•
city of eagan
PUE3LIC
1 WORKS
DEPARTMENT
WATER
MASTER PLAN
approved:
standard
plate 4:
, „.. • ' •
, ! ' • i I I T ISTIVF,j 1 S 1H - 4 --- ! :, : — • -- ' - `,\ \ s
\'‘.‘
1 1 Ii 47 2 [74.0 \ \
i I
Imio 11■111 I 1 1 tr I C-D , \
1 I 1 1 ; i P I I j I -1 • " \ \ \ X/ >'-•
X •
...ft 1 ,
1 ,12 I
•
66,0 •'
7/540 1 j 1 380/ j 16'.'
• L j ' L62.01 ,•;,!
'‘ Hot-IE:LLE or, 00
/i
(J I "7,
8
•
8 "
)
/ 74 0
551/ 7.0
8
.., -
- . ''. - --- - ------ - -.. --- - - -- 1\ \; %', ; ,, .„ . 2
, ..
• , - 12"
___-_-_-:--- 2 emu.
,,
1 ,
-,...../
N i
43 / 68 0
rf(Gi=orq ear am-
1
40,6/67.0
N
/
-
U.S. POSTAL
SERVICE
SUBJECT PARCEL
43 3/'0.0
! I
;
0
!12
57.4 / 85.0
\ \, 4 '
/ LEX
l e ;1 ..........
EACLTEri . '.
1 -- ,...,-..
-thintl t fw4, I-;2,Afl K 5/L)/i372.0 71
•-,,, . 0
7 'sill I LCQ5 )"16'f'n"
Oaragl." 0111111111111111.111.11000;114111.11. um um
H
, I
-- •
18" •
50 I I I I:
- 4 - 9 7/ 74.D
I I ,
(i!
3/75.0 3
0"
car
C53
51.2/7 0 675/91.0
L 2.3 77.0
FIG#3
=-)
, HP-4 • \
, • :
888.0
894.0 ,
3.3
0
I 1 •
4
I -
24"
••••••'. 0 .
. 9
OP-a
874.0
878.0 .
, 0
0 - h
■-?;--(:)P- I 5
876.0
878.2
. '
.
\
36'
0-
. ; \', ;, . * - \
n fair
____ -- • -;..; vairosies aterar
_ H - t 2
. 1 .. ' . -............. ....-0
.1 _. . -E ',•:::. ‘, ..L. 3, t_E ,.,‘ •;,:.,
• HP-3 ; , --.;--:::--- .\.;‘,.., -...., /.. ,
8 56.0
• 843.5
. ,
4 . . ..i ii
T s '
H- h • , ' , / ! . ,,
'-\\ - --- t•Y F P •
s / i/; 832
i -- 839
.. ,
-4/ s
I J •
H- k
// , •
-
0 - z
0-m L. S.- 30 v .
• 12"
DP- I 9
884 0
890
ThT
OINAMIND
=
E-s Er E-t
24
- F-
SUBJECT PARCEL
72
F 1G I
city of eagan
PUBLIC
_C! WORKS
DEPARTMEN
STORM SEWER
MASTER PLAN
approved:
standard
plate *:
March 24, 1988
EAGANDALE INDUSTRIAL PARR 10TH ADDITION - PRELIMINARY PLAT
AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
The final public hearing of the evening was convened by Chairman
Pawlenty in regard to the application of Opus Corporation for a
preliminary plat of 23.61 L -I (Light Industrial) acres containing
two lots, and conditional use permits for a Knox Lumber facility
with outside storage on Lot 1, Block 1, and a pylon sign, and a
special permit for a fence over 6 feet in height, located north of
Lone Oak Road and west of Lexington Avenue in the southeast quarter
of Section 3. Mr. Sturm introduced the applications, indicating
that staff and applicant had been working closely together on the
project for some time. He noted that at the joint APC and City
Council meeting in July of 1987, discussion had occurred in regard
to the location of Knox Lumber on this property. It was noted that
storage yards, provided they are suitably screened, are a permitted
use within an L -I district. The recommendation to the staff had
been to process the proposal as a conditional use to allow retail
lumber and related building material sales in an L -I district,
rather than rezoning the site.
Mr. Bob Worthington, Executive Director of Governmental Affairs
for Opus Corporation was present and gave a detailed review of the
project. The architect for Knob Lumber described the joint access,
landscaping, warehouse and open stock locations. The building was
to be constructed of tilt -up, pre -cast slab construction with cedar
trim. Extensive landscaping with fences and berms is proposed.
Mr. Worthington advised that the staff conditions were
acceptable other than condition 9 in that MnDOT was not cooperating
with selling 30 feet of unneeded right -of -way to provide a better
berm for the freeway view. Also, in his opinion, item 10 resulted
in a loss of value to the applicant for which it should be
compensated through reduced assessments. Mr. Worthington asked that
this be made of record for comment by the City Council. He also
indicated the intent to grade the entire site at one time.
Mr. Dick Schindeldecker, whose mother lives along the northerly
boundary, questioned whether there would be night time loading,
which Mr. Jack Walsh of Knox Lumber, indicated would not occur. Mr.
Walsh did advise that there would be outside speakers, but they were
focused in toward the site and would not include advertising. Also,
they were often not needed due to employees carrying walkie- talkies.
In regard to lighting, the architect indicated that all lighting
would be directed inward toward the property.
20Ai
March 24, 1988
Mr. Vernon Cole, 2977 Lexington Avenue, expressed his opinion
that the property should remain Light Industrial and not be used for
retail uses, due to unsafe conditions created by increased traffic.
He also pointed out that noise would be concentrated on weekends and
evenings and that the large amount of traffic would create
additional trash in the area. He also questioned whether the large
pond to the south would not overflow its boundaries on a more
frequent basis due to the construction. Mr. Cole suggested that
treated lumber and building materials might create a pollution
hazard.
Mr. Mark Post indicated a concern in regard to the size of the
berms and requested that in his particular area, it not be so high.
Ms. Kathleen Cole, 2977 Lexington, advised that she was not
informed of a proposed rezoning and that in her opinion there would
be erosion to the pond. Staff advised that DNR would monitor any
activity around the pond. Ms. Cole also indicated that she could
hear the loud speakers from American Fruit and Produce even across
the freeway. It was noted that I -35E was fenced and that the site
would already have a wire security fence, in addition to the wood
fence being proposed for aesthetic purposes.
In response to Mr. Voracek's concerns, the applicant indicated
that this proposal contained 50% more parking than the Burnsville
Knox Lumber, with twice the amount of enclosed store area, but not
as much yard area.
Mr. Worthington noted that this site would be responsible for
the assessments for all improvements and necessary to complete it.
Merkley moved, Trygg seconded the motion to'recommend approval
of the preliminary plat, subject to the following conditions:
1. This development shall accept its additional assessment
obligations as defined in the staff's report in accordance with the
final plat dimensions and the rates in effect at the time of final
plat approval.
2. This development shall dedicate 10 foot drainage and utility
easements centered over all common lot lines and adjacent to private
property or public right -of -way.
3. This development shall dedicate, provide, or financially
guarantee its proportionate share of the acquisition costs of
additional drainage, ponding, and utility easements as required by
the alignment, depth, and storage capacity of all required public
utilities and streets located beyond the boundaries of this plat or
outside of dedicated public right -of -way as necessary to service
this development.
-rL, “1"U�=.)
March 24, 1988
4. This development shall dedicate all public right -of -way and
temporary slope easements for ultimate development of adjacent
roadways as required by the appropriate jurisdictional agency.
5. This development shall dedicate adequate drainage and
ponding easements to incorporate the required high water elevation
necessitated by City storm water storage volume requirements.
6. All public streets and utilities necessary to provide
service to this development shall be designed by a registered
professional engineer in accordance with City codes and engineering
standards and policies, and approved by staff prior to final plat
approval.
7. A detailed grading, drainage, erosion, and sediment control
plan must be prepared in accordance with current City standards and
approved by staff prior to final plat approval.
8. A detailed landscape plan shall be submitted on the proposed
grading plan and approved by staff prior to the final plat approval.
The financial guarantee shall be included in the Development
Contract and not released until one year after the date of
installation.
9. If any public improvements are to be installed under a City
contract, the appropriate project must be approved by Council action
prior to final plat approval.
10. This development shall be responsible for the acquisition
of all regulatory agency permits in the time frame required by the
affected agency.
11. This development shall fulfill its parks dedication
requirements as recommended by the Advisory Parks and Recreation
Commission and approved by Council action.
12. All standard platting and zoning conditions shall be
adhered to unless specifically granted a variance by _Council action.
13. No exterior sales displays shall be allowed.
14. No exterior loudspeaker advertising shall be allowed.
15. Permanent exterior storage shall be no higher than nine
feet.
16. All . signage shall be subject to the one -time sign fee of
$2.50 per square foot.
17. No rooftop mechanical equipment shall be visible.
APC :iinuces
March 24, 1988
18. All permanent cart storage shall be included in the
building.
19. All pole lighting shall be directed inward or cut offs
shall be required if off -site spillage occurs.
20. Screening along Highway I -35E shall be resolved through the
efforts of MnDOT, City staff and the applicant, with berming being
the preferred resolution, making the storage yard not visible from
the north or south bound I -35E.
21. No additional runoff into or any reconfiguration of the
pond on the east side of Lot 2 will be allowed.
22. The development will be required to provide sanitary sewer
and water service to each platted lot.
23. The development is responsible for providing the properly
sized water main service and hydrant coverage as required by fire
protection - criteria, City Codes and engineering standards.
24. The 'development will be responsible for providing
restricted access along the entire length of Lone Oak Road and the
entire length along Lexington Avenue except for one access point
along the common lot lines between Lots 1 and 2.
25. The 10 foot wood fence and dense landscaping shall be
provided on both the northerly and southerly borders of the
property. -
All voted yes.
Merkley moved, Trygg seconded the motion to recommend approval
of the conditional use permit for a retail lumber facility in an L -I
district. All voted aye.
Merkley moved, Voracek seconded the motion to recommend approval
of the conditional use permit for a pylon sign, subject to council
determination of height and size. All voted yes.
Merkley moved, Trygg seconded the motion regarding a special
permit for the fence over 6 feet in height. The motion was
withdrawn and staff advised that no action was required on a special
permit.
ADJOURNMENT
Trygg moved, Merkley seconded the motion to adjourn at 12:50
a.m. All voted in favor.
Secretary - APC
23 c L
DGK
Agenda Information Memo
April 19, 1988, City Council Meeting
CONSIDER LEGAL SERVICES
(CITY ATTORNEY. PROSECUTION & SPECIAL LEGAL PROJECTS)
N. Consider Legal Services (City Attorney, Prosecution and
Special Legal Projects) - -At the February 2, 1988, City Council
meeting, action was taken to direct the City Administrator to
prepare requests for proposals for engineering, legal and fiscal
services. The engineering services were handled first and action
was taken at the March 15 City Council meeting. The process for
considering legal proposals to include City Attorney, Special
Projects and Prosecution has been completed. The review and
consideration of legal services was handled in two (2) parts: 1)
City Attorney and Special Projects and 2) Prosecution. The City
Administrator, Director of Finance, Director of Public Works and
City Planner reviewed all proposals for City Attorney and Special
Projects and screen the list for interviews to five for the City
Council. Along with the City Administrator, the Chief of Police
and our Administrative Captain screened the list of prosecution
consultants to three who were interviewed by the City Council.
Interviews were conducted at City Hall on April 12 and 13. For a
copy of the procedure for those special City Council meetings,
refer to pages q 7 through O .
Following the interviews, the City Administrator was directed to
perform a reference check on the law firms that are under
consideration. That information was enclosed without page
number.
A transition period will be required if a firm is hired other
than the firm of Hauge, Eide and Keller. It is expected that the
transition for most pending legal work would be approximately two
(2) months.
The City Council can designate an individual as City Attorney
with the understanding that individual's firm would handle most
general legal work for the community. It is also possible to
designate one or more firms for special legal services such as
bond counsel, labor /employment law and other specialties or
specific projects. Firms that are being considered are as
follows:
Grannis, Grannis, Ferrell & Knutson
Hauge, Eide & Keller
McMenomy & Severson
LeFevere, Leffler, Kennedy, O'Brien and Drawz
Maun, Green, Hayes, Johanneson & Brehl
Additional firms the City reserves the right to call on for
special projects are: Fagre & Benson (Bond Counsel) and Ratwick,
Roszak, Maloney & Bartel (Labor /Employment Law).
Agenda Information Memo
April 19, 1988, City Council Meeting
Those firms that are being considered for prosecution work are as
follows:
McMenomy & Severson
Grannis, Grannis, Ferrell & Knutson
Hauge, Eide & Keller
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: 1) Designate a City
Attorney and his /her lawfirm for general legal work; 2) designate
law firms for special legal services realizing that the City
Council reserves the right to call upon other law firms as it
determines as special projects arise during a calendar year and
3) to designate a firm for prosecution services.
MEMO TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIIMEMBERS
FROM: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES
DATE: APRIL 8, 1988
SUBJECT: LEGAL CONSULTANT INTERVIEWS /CITY ATTORNEY AND SPECIAL
PROJECTS
A special City Council meeting is scheduled for Tuesday, April 12
at 6:30 p.m., to interview five (5) law firms for the purpose of
selecting a firm to provide general and special legal advice to
the City Council and various City departments. The meeting was
originally scheduled for 7:00 p.m., however, by starting the
interviews at 6:30 p.m. the last interview will end at 9:00,
allowing the City Council time for discussion and deliberation
and the ability to respect a 10:00 adjournment.
Background
At the February 2, 1988 meeting, authorization was given to
prepare a request for proposal for the consideration of legal
services including city attorney, special legal projects and
prosecution. This memo and special City Council meeting
addresses the city attorney and special projects. The interviews
for prosecution services are scheduled for Wednesday, April 13,
and attached is a separate memo addressing those services. At
the February 2 meeting, the City Administrator was directed to
advertise for engineering, legal and fiscal consulting services.
It was decided that the three (3) services would be staggered,
with engineering being considered first, next legal and third,
fiscal. Enclosed is a copy of a letter, time table and RFP that
was distributed to a number of law firms on February 17. Unlike
the engineering services, the City did advertise in the local
newspapers for legal consulting services.
Review Process
There were eight (8) proposals received for city attorney
(general) and eleven (11) proposals received for special legal
projects. Obviously, some firms submitted proposals that include
providing both services. All proposals were reviewed by the
Director of Finance, Director of Public Works, City Planner and
City Administrator. Reviews were performed on an independent
basis and the results shared at a collective management meeting.
At this meeting, there was a consensus that the following five
(5) firms should be interviewed by the City Council:
Grannis, Grannis, Farrell & Knutson
Hauge, Eide & Keller
McMenomy & Severson
LeFevere, Lefler, Kennedy, O'Brien & Drawz
Maun, Green, Hayes, Johanneson & Brehl
�S7
Interview and Selection Consideration
Each law firm has been told they will have one -half hour for the
interview. Their presentation should be limited to no longer
than 12 - 15 minutes. This will allow the remaining 15 minutes
for questions by members of the City Council. A list of sample
questions have been prepared for your reference. Also, an
evaluation form is included for your benefit.
Whether a city is a Plan A or Plan B statutory city, the city
attorney is selected directly by the City Council, unlike all
other personnel and consulting services. A city attorney is
expected to advise the City Council and provide the appropriate
legal counseltation and direction in the best interest of the
City. One very important consideration in the selection of a law
firm is a level of commitment for providing legal service to this
city. As the fastest growth community in the state, there is a
considerable volume of work requiring legal review or legal
involvement. The City staff and City Council must be assured of
a total commitment not only by the firm but by the lead person
who will be the designated city attorney.
Summary
Enclosed for your review is a matrix that summarizes all the
firms that were reviewed by this office and interview team. The
five (5) that you will be interviewing on Tuesday are the first
five in order. When the last interview concludes at 9:00, the
Council may wish to have a discussion regarding the interviews,
however, no decision should be reached until the regular City
Council meeting on April 19. Copies of each of the five
successful firms are attached for your review. If any member of
the City Council would like to discuss why a particular firm was
excluded from the interview process, please feel free to contact
this office anytime prior to the interviews. Also, the City
Council does reserve the right to interview any other firm, if it
so desires on completion of the interviews on Tuesday evening.
(\V.v....0.s
City Administrato
Enclosures
TLH /j eh
,g
MEMO TO: HONORABLE MAYOR & CITY COUNCILMEMBERS
FROM: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES
DATE: APRIL 8, 1988
SUBJECT: SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING TO
INTERVIEW FOR PROSECUTION SERVICES
BACKGROUND
A special City Council meeting is scheduled for Wednesday, April
13, 1988, at 7:00 p.m., to interview three (3) firms for
prosecution services. Since the City Council will have
interviewed the same firms for general and special project
services on Tuesday, April 12, and, therefore, each firm was
advised to keep their presentation to the personnel who will
provide prosecution services and not be redundant by providing
general background on the firm. It is expected that these
interviews will take approximately 20 to 25 minutes. As stated
at the City Council meeting on Wednesday, it is not necessary
that all members of the City Council attend the interview
session, however, it would be appropriate to have a majority
present which constitutes a special meeting.
SCREENING PROCESS
Assisting the City Administrator in the review process was our
Police Management consisting of Chief Berthe and both Captains
Ken Aszmann and Pat Geagan. It is the recommendation of our
Police Management that the City Council restrict the interviews
to Dakota County Law firms realizing that most all of the
prosecution work requires presentations before our Dakota County
judges. A Dakota County law firm is important in that process.
Firms to be interviewed are as follows:
McMenomy & Severson
Grannis, Grannis, Farrell & Knutson
Hauge, Eide & Keller
The City Administrator asked the Chief of Police to prepare a
memo that provides some background information on what are
prosecution services. That memo is attached for your review.
Questions have been prepared and are enclosed for your review.
Please refer to the matrix and proposals that are enclosed
containing information about the prosecuting attorney services.
If any member of the City Council has a question regarding a firm
that was excluded, please feel free to contact this office on
Monday. Again, the City Council reserves the right to interview
one or additional law firms for prosecution services after
Wednes if ou so desire.
3830 Pilot Knob Road
Eagan, Minnesota 55122
Phone: (6121 44-3(200 8, 1988
dtv cif ccc cn
TO: TOM HEDGES, CITY ADMINISTRATOR
FROM: PAT GEAGAN, CAPTAIN
SUBJECT: PROSECUTION
Pat Geagan, Captain
:ATT
THE LONE OAK TREE. THE SYMBOL OF STRENGTH AND GROWTH IN OUR COMMUNITY
?ogIc cep ✓armlen
JAY M. BERTHE
Chief of PoIce
PATRICK J. GEAGAN
Administratrve Captain
KENNETH D. ASZMANN
Operations Caotarn
VIC ELLISON
Mayor
THOMAS EGAN
DAVID K. GUSTAFSON
PAMELA McCREA
THEODORE WACHTER
Council Members
THOMAS HEDGES
City Administrator
EUGENE VAN OVERBEKE
City Clerk
Members of the Eagan Police Department work with the City
Prosecutor in the charging of petty misdemeanors, misdemeanors
and gross misdemeanors. The City Prosecutor is involved in
the prosecution of criminal cases from the time of arrest to
final conviction and has considerable influence on the
sentencing. The prosecutor must make a determination on
whether there is sufficient probability of guilt to justify
subjecting a suspect to trial. The prosecutor must make a
decision as to whether or not the prosecution is in the public
interest, and a choice as to the specific crime to be charged.
The prosecutor must have a close working relationship with the
City Police Officers based on mutual respect. The City
Prosecutor will deal on a regular basis with every sworn
officer within the department.
The successful prosecutor must also be familiar with the
abilities and also the prejudices and idiosyncrasies of the
court system in which they work. City Prosecutors must be
able trial lawyers, as they interact with many specialized
defense attorneys.
It is estimated that the City Prosecutor will prepare
approximately 650 criminal complaints, open 600 active
(contested files) and appear in excess of more than 300 trial
settings. The City Attorney must be available to prepare
approximately 30 gross misdemeanor complaints as
expeditiously as possible, due to the fact defendants are
incarcerated.
The police and the prosecutor have a consistent and mutually
supportive role in working together to protect the health and
welfare of the citizens in our community.
Agenda Information Memo
April 19, 1988, City Council Meeting
'ADDITIONAL ITEMS
PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT CONTRACTS
A. Public Improvement Contracts:
Item 1. Contract 88 -1, Receive Bids /Award Contract (Fire Station
#5) - -At 11:00 a.m. on Thursday, April 14, formal bids were
received for the construction of Fire Station #5 under the above -
referenced contract. Enclosed on pages * through * is a
tabulation of the bids received and a letter of formal
recommendation made by the architect, Arthur Dickey Architects,
Inc.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To receive the bids for
Contract 88 -1 (Fire Station #5) and award the contract to the
lowest responsible bidder and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk
to execute all related documents.
* The bid tabulation and letter will be available for distribu-
tion with the Additional Information packet on Monday.
��1
Agenda Information Memo
April 19, 1988, City Council Meeting
Item 2. Contract 88 -3, Receive Bids /Award Contract (Wescott &
Northview Park Roads - Surfacing) - -At 10:30 a.m. on Thursday,
April 14, formal bids were received for the final surfacing of
Wescott Road and the street construction of Northview Park Road
adjacent to or within the Eagan Hills Farm development. Enclosed
on page ,n3 is a tabulation of the bids received with an
analysis of the low bid to the engineer's estimate and the
feasibility reports presented at the respective public hearings.
An evaluation of the bids received will be performed by the
consulting engineering firm with a formal recommendation being
provided by the Public Works Director at the April 19 meeting.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To receive the bids and
award Contract 88 -3 (Wescott & Northview Park Roads - Surfacing)
to the lowest responsible bidder and authorize the Mayor and City
Clerk to execute all related documents.
Low Bid
CONTRACTORS TOTAL BASE BID
1. Bituminous Roadways, Inc.
2. Preferred Pavings, Inc.
3. Valley Paving
Engineer's Estimate (E.E.)
Feasibility Report (F.R.)
% Over ( +) / Under ( -) E.E.
% Over ( +) / Under ( -) F.R.
NORTHVIEW PARK ROAD - MSAP NO. 195 - 118 -02
CITY PROJECT NO. 491F & 498C
WESCOTT ROAD WEAR COURSE - MSAP N0. 195 - 106 -06
CITY PROJECT 494C
CITY CONTRACT 88 -03
EAGAN, MINNESOTA
Proj. 494C
$122,985.68 + $ 9,663.50(State aid = $132,649.18
will not participate)
,Z93
$ 428,241.21
432,303.18
445,958.89
182,641.00
87,560.00
-27.
+ 51.5%
Proj. 491F & 498C
$ 295,592.03
422,540.00
367,580.00
- 30.0%
- 19.6%
Agenda Information Memo
April 19, 1988, City Council Meeting
Item 3. Contract 88 -14, Receive Bids /Award Contract (Briar Oaks
of Apple Valley - Trunk Storm & Sanitary Sewer) - -At 10:45 a.m. on
Thursday, April 14, 1988, formal bids were received for the
installation of trunk storm and sanitary sewer to service the
Eagan Royale and Briar Oaks of Apple Valley developments.
Enclosed on page J is a tabulation of the bids received with
a comparison of'the low bid to the engineer's estimate and those
contained in the feasibility report presented at the respective
public hearing. An analysis of the bids received will be
performed by the consulting engineering firm with a
recommendation being provided by the Public Works Director at the
April 19 meeting. A final status of the easement acquisition
process necessary to initiate this contract will be provided by
the City Attorney also at that time.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To receive the bids and
award Contract 88 -14 (Briar Oaks of Apple Valley - Trunk Storm &
Sanitary Sewer) to the lowest responsible bidder and authorize
the Mayor and City Clerk to execute all related documents.
BRIAR OAKS (EAGAN ROYALE) - PROJECT NO. 500
TRUNK UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS
EAGAN, MINNESOTA 1988
Bid Time: 10:45 A.M.
Bid Date: Thursday, April 14, 1988
CONTRACTOR TOTAL BASE BID ALTERNATE BID
1. F.F. Jedlicki, Inc. $ 190,064.00 $ 8,590.00
2. Fredrickson Exc., Co., Inc. 222,390.00 10,769.00
3. Northdale Const. 228,502.94 9,219.38
LOW BID $ 190,064.00 $ 198,654.00
Feasibility Report Estimate (F.R.) 260,260.00 278,260.00
Engineer's Estimate (E.E.) 260,000.00 278,000.00
% over ( +) / Under ( -) F.R. - 27% - 29%
over ( +) / Under ( -) E.E. - 26.9% - 28.5%
S
Agenda Information Memo
April 19, 1988, City Council Meeting
Item 4. Contract 88 -9, Approve Plans /Authorize Ad For Bids
(Manor Lake - Trunk Utilities) - -With the approval of the
preliminary plat and the public hearing for Project #520 (Manor
Lake Trunk Utilities), the Council authorized the preaparation of
detailed plans and specifications. These plans have now been
completed and are being presented to the Council for their
consideration of authorizing the advertisement for competitive
bids. The Environmental Assessment Worksheet has received a
negative declaration and all required easements have either been
acquired or will be dedicated with the final plat for this
development. The staff has received and is presently processing
the final plat application for this subdivision.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the plans for
Contract 88 -9 (Manor Lake - Trunk Utilities) and authorize the
advertisement for a bid opening to be held at 10:30 a.m. on
Thursday, May 12, 1988.
Agenda Information Memo
April 19, 1988, City Council Meeting
Item 5. Contract 88 -19, Receive Bids /Award Contract (Well #5 -
Pump Repair) - -At 10:30 a.m. on Monday, April 18, 1988, formal
bids will be received for Well #5 - Pump Repair. A tabulation of
the bids received will be included with the Additional
Information packet on Monday. An evaluation of the bids received
will be performed by the consulting engineering firm with a
formal recommendation being provided by the Public Works Director
at the April 19 meeting.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To receive the bids and
award Contract 88 -19 ( Well *5 - Pump Repair) to the lowest
responsible bidder and authorize he Mayor and City Clerk to
execute all related documents.
MEMO TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS
FROM: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES
DATE: APRIL 19, 1988
SUBJECT: INFORMATIVE
SENIOR HOUSING ARTICLE /REAL ESTATE JOURNAL
Enclosed on page g - DOis a copy of an article that appeared in
the Minnesota Real Estate Journal in the March 28 edition
entitled "Maturing Market, Twin Cities Soaked with Senior
Housing."
LMC ADVERTISEMENT IN JUNE MAGAZINE
Enclosed on pages 3O ( through 3 _ is a copy of a memo from
the League of Minnesota Cities offering member cities the
opportunity to advertise in the June issue of their monthly
magazine at a discounted rate. Please review, and if it is the
pleasure of the City Council to advertise, staff should prepare
an advertisement for consideration at the next Council meeting.
STATUS REPORT FOR ASSISTED HOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
Enclosed on pages 3 through 3b 4 is a copy of the March
status report for 17 - Dakota County and the City of Eagan for
assisted housing.
MINNESOTA TWINS VS. TEXAS RANGERS
In addition to the proclamation that was addressed as a part of
consent, a flier is enclosed on page chat outlines the
activities for Eagan night at the Metrodome on June 1. The City
Administrator has set aside a block of tickets which includes two
for each City Council member. A commitment should be made to
this office by the next regular City Council meeting if you are
planning to attend. After that date all tickets will be sold on
a first come, first serve basis to the general public at the
front counter. The City has an allocation of 100 Twins tickets
in the upper deck behind home plate.
BILL FOR HOMER HANKIES
Included with the list of bills at the April 5 City Council
meeting, was an expenditure in the amount of $375 to the Star and
Tribune for homer hankies. The Parks Department is sponsoring a
batter up program on May 14 at Rahn Park. The University of
Minnesota will be demonstrating the fundamentals of baseball to
Eagan youth. As a part of the activity, each youth in attendace
will receive a homer hankie. This expenditure was paid for from
the "Town Centre Trust Fund" that was established in 1987 as a
result of a donation by the Town Centre merchants to the City of
Eagan for the promotion of youth programs in our community. The
committee that reviews all requests did authorize this
expenditure.
PROTECTIVE INSPECTIONS/MARCH 1988
Enclosed on pages �Uto =5 't is a copy of the Protective
Inspections monthly report for March.
FINAL REPORT ON THE ART PARK CONCEPT
Susan Sands, a consultant with S & B Properties was retained by
the City of Eagan approximately a year ago to review an Art
Park /Sculpture Garden concept for the Anthony Caponi property
located on Diffley Road, east of Pilot Knob Road. Her report was
finalized and a copy is enclosed for your review. The City
Administrator has communicated the City Council's priority
regarding this item with Ms. Sands. She is aware that the City
cannot commit public funds to the project, however, has ranked
the concept as a low priority long term and would encourage the
project with the understanding that private funds are necessary
for its success. There is no formal action required by the City
Council at this time. A copy of the report will be distributed
to the Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission for their review
and at some later date action acknowledging the report as a
matter of official record would be appropriate. The report is
enclosed without page number.
/s/ Thomas L. Hedges
City Administrator
VOLUME 4, NUMBER 13
--
Maturing
market
TWIN C:TIES SOA (ED
WITH SENIOR HOUSING
by Karen Padlev Geisler
he senior housing boom of the ear-
ly '80s is over.
The St. Charles, a 194 -unit senior proiect
on Loring Park in Minneapolis. was sold in
December, renamed the Park Terrace Apart-
ments and opened to adults of all ages.
Castle Ridge, a senior condominium proj-
ect. is being changed by its new owners into
the Broadmoor of Eden Prairie, an apartment
complex for adults age 25 and older.
Several other senior projects are having
financial problems; some of those approved
by city officials have never broken ground.
Not all is doom and gloom, of course.
Some new projects aimed at specific market
segments are doing well and some have
waiting lists.
But many have vacancies. So much so that
the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban
Development (HUD) will not underwrite any
additional market -rate senior projects and is
becoming more selective with its funds for
subsidized senior housing.
Most of those involved in the senior hous-
ing industry say the overall market is sat-
urated. A few see some "pockets" remaining,
mostly for moderate income, independent
seniors, and mostly in the St. Paul suburbs.
All agree the earlier boom means seniors
have more housing options open to them than
in most parts of the country.
"We are several years ahead of most
metropolitan areas." says Tom Melchior.
senior research analyst, Maxfield Research
Group. Both Detroit and Chicago are where
the Twin Cities was about Live years ago.
Whv the deluge? The statewide
moratorium on additional nursing home beds
imposed in 1983 is one reason. Minnesota's
tradition of providing social services to its
citizens is another.
But the result has been too much, too soon.
A February 1987 HUD report estimated that
33.4 percent of the 6.136 market -rate "retire-
ment service center" units (those providing
at least one meal a day) were vacant.
It also estimated about 31.8 percent of the
7.226 units expected to be available January
1988 would be vacant. Such a rate would be
Live times that of the metro apartment market.
Not much improvement is in sight.
Given an annual net absorption rate of 450
units, a pace HUD calls a "best case"
scenario, vacancy would only drop to 27.7
percent by January 1989.
Even that number, however, assumed no
additional units. Melchior estimates there are
about 2,600 senior - specific, market -rate units
planned or proposed in the seven- county
area, an increase of about 30 percent from the
existing 8,400 units he puts in that category.
Rod Johnson, an economist with HUD's
Minneapolis office, says he gets several calls
a month from developers and neighborhood
groups interested in senior housing.
"We still find people out there attempting
to do senior housing who are not looking at
the hard data," he says.
Adds Dennis Shegos, another HUD
economist: "To propose anything else is
ridiculous. People are trying to find niches
where there are none."
As a result. HUD does not expect to under-
write any more senior projects until the supp-
ly drops below the amount that can be ab-
sorbed in two years.
The demographics, on their face, would
not seem to support such a move. Minnesota
ranks second nationally in average life expec-
tancy at 76.15 years, according to a 1987 report
by the Minnesota State Planning Agency.
But seniors' needs, financial resources and
willingness to give up their single- family
home have been overestimated, consultants
say.
"The demographic data tends to treat
everyone over 65 the same," says Tom Luchi,
an analyst with Laventhol & Horwath. He
and several others say successful projects
generally have aimed at one of the three basic
categories within the senior population.
• Active seniors. Usually ages 65 to 75. In-
dependent, like to travel. May want to give up
the burden of maintaining a house and yard.
• Intermediate seniors. Usually ages 75 to 85.
Physical abilities may decline. Travel is
replaced by card - playing. Death or illness of
a spouse may prompt a move into senior
housing with some services.
• Advanced or frail. Ages 85 and up. Meals,
health care and a full range of services are
available and often needed.
The final group is the fastest growing,
Luchi notes. but the absolute numbers are
small. The other two categories, though,
aren't expected to grow much in the next
decade.
"The birthrate dropped during the Depres-
sion and World War 11 cut into the population
as well." he says. The well - publicized "aging
of the Baby Boomers" won't hit until after the
year 2000.
Luchi notes a soon -to -be released study by
Laventhol & Horwath, using its own data
base, indicates the 65- and -over group does
have a higher per capita income than the
population as a whole and that level is in-
creasing at a faster rate.
However, he adds, their income is much
more likely to be affected by such things as
catastrophic illness or be tied up in illiquid
assets such as a home.
The first two groups are also proving more
reluctant to move than many had expected.
They generally owe little or nothing on their
home. As a result, they can take their time
when making a decision.
League of Minnesota Cities
April 6, 1988
Dear city official:
Many of you are probably making plans to attend the League's annual conference June 7 -10 in St . Paul . This year
is even more special with the League celebrating its 75th anniversary.
The League is offering member cities the opportunity to advertise in the June issue of the magazine at a discounted
rate. This is an excellent way to show your support of the League, convention delegates, and to promote your city.
The June magazine is the most popular issue of the year. This year we have a special section devoted to the
history of the League, making this issue a special souvenir. Be part of the 75th celebration and the annual con-
ference by advertising in the June issue of Minnesota Cities.
A few sample advertisements arc enclosed to give you some ideas for your city. One possibility is to feature a
unique or historic aspect of your city, or to congratulate the League on its anniversary celebration. Many cities
also promote their celebrations. Your city logo, emblem, or centennial seals work well in ads as do photographs
or drawings. Hint -- limit the amount of copy in your ad.
If you need help in designing an advertisement or need more ideas, please call . We will be happy to help.
We encourage cities to submit camera ready art, but if that is not possible we can provide typesetting and graphic
services to you at cost . Generally, an ad can be done for less than $50.
To reserve your city's place in this historic publication, please complete the attached form and return by May 5.
The deadline for camera ready art is May 10. If you want us to do the typesetting and graphics, we need to receive
the information by May 1.
Sincerely,
xhritzt__
183 University Ave. East
St. Paul, MN 55101 -2526
(612) 227 -5600 (FAX: 221 -0986)
Debra Nyberg
Assistant Editor
ORDER FORM CITY AD FOR JUNE ISSUE MINNESOTA CITIES
Full page $200 7" wide, 10" high 1/4 page $75 3 1/2" wide, 5" high
1/2 page $125 7" wide, 5" high 1/8 page $50 2 1/4" wide, 3 1/4 high
Materials enclosed Ad size Payment Enclosed Bill
Comments
Address City State, Zip
Authorized by
1/4 page
1/2 page
City of Hoyt Laces
"Recreation Center of Minnesota"
Fisherman's Point Campground
Call (218) 225 -3337 for reservations
City of Hoyt Lakes
Municipal Building
Hoyt Lakes, MN 55750
(218) 225-2344
ARLINGTON COUNTY
Virgino's Number One
Travel Destinonon
Best Wishes to the
Virginia Municipal League
for a
successful conference
Join us for
the
Water Carnival
July 24 -26
and
Vintage Car Show
July 18 -19
Oe
1/8 page
The city of
Keewatin
Where living is fun!
Enjoy recreation in all
its outdoor varieties.
Watch mining in
progress at our
observation platform
or enter our softball
tournaments during
our Fourth of July
celebration.
ASSISTED HOUSING
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
* + = Increase /- = Decrease
Status Report for Dakota County **
March, 1988
TOTAL ASSISTED HOUSING 1,050
Section 8 Existing:
Certificates 385 1,190 1,575 +4
Vouchers 34 168 202 -2
Moderate Rehab 4 21 25 0
Section 8 New Construction 247 300 547 0
Low Rent Housing 380 190 570 +8
235 Home 0 41 41 0
236 Rental 0 526 526 0
Amount
of
Elderly Family Total ( + / -)*
2,436 3,486
+10
Amount
Commercial/ of
Elderly Family Multifamily Total Increase
MHFA Local Participation 0 2 0 2 0
MHFA Home Improvement Loan 33 160 0 193 1
MHFA Home Rehab Loan 63 76 0 139 0
MHFA Home Energy Loan 10 112 0 122 3
Rental Rehab 38 49 5 92 0
CDBG Rehab Loan 87 159 0 246 0
CDBG Rehab Loan - Mobile Home 1 20 0 21 0
MHFA Solar Bank Energy Loan 0 8 0 8 0
312 Loan - Residential 4 15 0 19 0
312 Loan - Commercial/
Mixed Use N/A N/A 3 3 0
Weatherization 347 1,386 0 1,733 11
TOTAL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 583 1,980 8 2,571 15
** Numbers for the City of South St. Paul are included in
Assisted Housing, Rental Rehab, and Weatherization, but are
excluded from the rest of the Community Development programs;
South St. Paul operates separate Community Development
programs.
ASSISTED HOUSING
Status Report for the City of Eagan
March, 1988
Amount
of
Elderly Family Total ( + / -)*
Section 8 Existing:
Certificates 37 238 275 0
Vouchers 19 60 79 -1
Section 8 New Construction 0 33 33 0
Low Rent Housing 0 17 17 0
236 Rental 0 144 144 0
TOTAL ASSISTED HOUSING 56 492 548 -1
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
Amount
of
Elderly Family Total Increase
MHFA Home Improvement Loan 2 13 . 15 1
MHFA Home Rehab Loan 3 3 6 0
MHFA Home Energy Loan 1 8 9 0
CDBG Rehab Loan 1 4 5 0
Weatherization 5 64 69 0
TOTAL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 12
* + = Increase /- = Decrease
92 104
1
Vs. Texas Rangers
date
June 1, 1988 Ti 7M5p.rn.
NDC CHAMBERS NIGHT AT THE DOME
.0 .10vair
..- &picnic
... a baligame
... a giveaway!
Eagan MENDOTA HEIGHTS
Dakota County State Bank
Shelard National Bank
Al Baker's
Norwest Bank
Signal Hills Bank
City Hall
Dakota County State Bank
City Hall
5:00 p.m.
BUSES LEAVE Town Centre, Eagan
NW Corner Signal Hills Mace
Rosemount City Hall
5:30 p.m.
PICNIC SUPPER at the Metrodome
6:55 p.m.
SPECIAL PROGRAM inside the Dome
TICKET OUTLETS
ROSEMOUNT
Home Plate Upper Deck Reserved @ $8.00 each
Picnic Tickets $3.00 each Bus Tickets $4.00 each
MAKE CHECKS PAYABLE TO: NORTHERN DAKOTA COUNTY CHAMBERS OF COMMERCE, 1301 Corporate
Center Drive, #116, Eagan, Minnesota, 55121
TWINS CONTACT 452 -9872
Rosemount National Bank
First State Bank
Shenanigan's
Kady's
City Hall
WEST ST. PAUL
$4.00
$3.00
First State Bank of WSP
Cherokee Sirloin
Signal Hills Bank
Mr. Steak
Parks & Rec Dept.
2 iCOMMERCIAL
TYPh; NO. VALUATION
464,000 I
etHMll rnn
WORN Mt.V L.V.V.
lUiRL rnnD
1
i
FOUNDATION 0
10 1,420,000
5,900.00 i 2,637.00
10,096.50
127
SINGLE FAMILY 68 ;$ 7,329,000
;$
40,240.00
$ 20,119.00
$ 186,151.00
2
DUPLEX
2 4 118,000
0
820.00
i 410.00
4,881.00
1
TOWNHOUSE
1 434,000
i
1,660.00
j 830.00
13,483.50
4
CONDO
4
1,036,000
4,360.00
! 2,180.00
28,986.00
0 APT RLDGS
0
4
RES. ADDITIONS
2 iCOMMERCIAL
2 I
464,000 I
2,004.00 f 1,002.00
13,778.00
19
COMM/IND REMODEL
10 1,420,000
5,900.00 i 2,637.00
10,096.50
1
COMM /IND ADDITION
0
0
INDUSTRIAL
0
0
(INSTITUTIONAL
0
0
PUBLIC FACILITIES
0
I
0
RES. GARAGES
0
4
RES. ADDITIONS
2
20,600
220.00 61.00
291.50
1
SWIM POOL
1
12,000
122.00
61.00
189.00
55
MISCELLANEOUS
31 137,200
1,790.50
166.00
2,088.00
0
DEMOLISH
0
HOUSE MOVES
MO. TOTALS
121
10,970,800
57,116.50 27,466.00
i
259,944.50
T7
YEAR -TO -DATE TOTALS
18,506,972
95,904.00
1 45,890.00
427,522.10
I
NUMBER OF PERMITS ISSUED
Electrical
Plumbing
HVAC
Water Softener
Signs
Well, Cesspool, Septic Tank
YTD
0 AGRICULTURAL
PROTECTIVE INSPECTIONS MONTHLY REPORT -
0
MONTHLY
THIS MONTH YEAR -TO -DATE
136 291
85 183
89 206
25
19
0
NATURE OF BUILDING PERMITS ISSUED
MARCH 1988
32
33
0
-
TYPE
MO.
# OF
PERMITS
MO. # OF
BUILDINGS
YTD # OF
BUILDINGS
MO.
# OF
UNITS
YTD.
# OF
UNITS
# OF
PERMITS
VOIDED
# OF
UNITS
MOVED IN
I DUPLEX
2
1
1
2
2
3 -PLEX
4 -ALEX
4
4
4
16
16
5 -PLEX 1
6-PLEX 1
1
1
6
6
7 -PI,EX
8-PLEX
10 -PLEX
12 -PLEX
16 -PLEX
APT. BLDG.
OTHER
TOTAL:
7
6
6
24 24
PROTECTIVE INSPECTIONS - MONTHLY REPORT
DATE
MARCH 1988
TI- FAMILY BREAKDOWN
3 0�l
OCCUP.
7,0MM NEW
MMM NEW
;OMM REM
)OMM REM
COMM REM
�OMM REM
COMM REM
COMM REM
COMM REM
OMM REM
OMM REM
S33,3 'IVIO L
i 00'0 9Z `ZT$
1 00'8T5`
5,674.00
987.00
OS'6£8
1 OS•6OL
OS' 1Z
00•SZZ`T
OS•ZOT
51.50
00' E17
00'C
PLAN REV
FEES
1 00'16L
211.00
1,718.00
100'0T£
00'S9Z
225.00
1 00'611
I
STATE
SURCHARGE
I 00•TOZ
1 00'1£
1 00'x45
00' LS
1 OS'1717
I OS '
[o•L
Z
IOS'£1
[05•
OS'T I
00'T
00'T 1
l
v PERMIT
FEE
1,582.00
422.00
00'9£
1 00'029
1 00'0£5
00'05
394.00
1 00'8£2
1 00'86
00•05
00'2
00
NOI LVWIVA
•
000 ` zol7 $
000`29
1,050,000
000`1711
I 000`68
000'69
000`SS
27,000
000`6
0 0 0 `£
o00`z
4.
000`z
RLNMO
-. i. ror ...,. - n n Inn
BBD INVESTMENT
J gin MN
UPPER MIDWEST
MGMT CORP
R.L. JOHNSON
INVESTMENT
TRAMMELL CROW
DALLAS DEVEL
OPUS CORP
R. WOOLERY
DAULTON FOR
HAIR
'1131142 NRAVH I
FEDERAL LAND
BUSINESS DEVEL
SALF.S INC
'IvDr`I 'P SS3RQQV
3370 COACHMAN RD
L2, B1, BBD 2ND
1440 CLIFF RD
L012. B1, SECT.33
3910 SIB MEM HWY
Tn51 RA SF.CT 19
•
1750YANKEE DOODLE RD
L1, B1, R.L. JOHNSON 2ND
.10 :GA WSID IR
L1, B1, EAGAN WOODS OFC
I I
2020 SILVER BELL RD
1.1. B1. DALLAS DEVEL
1230 EAGAN INDUSTRIAL Rut
L1- 4.B3.EAG CTR 1ND PK 1
I
3390 COACHMAN RD
Ll. Bl. BBD ADD.
4
1565 CLIFF RD
1.1_ 111_ THOMAS LK CTR
a
a
4130 BLACKHAWK RD
LI. B1. BLACKHAWK PLAZA
I
4
4
1284 TOWN CTR DR
L2. B1. TOWN CTR 70 2ND
�
i
1565 CLIFF RD
T_1 P. TAnMAS LK CTR
]
a
699
14705
14668 1
14746
l 069 1 71
14723
1 989171
14678
I 099 1 71
1
14727
TTL
( .
>�
i
PROTECTIVE INSPECTIONS - MONTHLY REPORT
MARCH 1988
L8E
nmouvaaa ilmousuum
S80& SNO]
0
0
1d
N
t0
O
VI
0
m
v
0
n
H
a
CD 0 0 � N
1.- 0 c D1
• W '7 CJ c r
M 0
0
0'
00
O
M
A
0
PROTECTIVE INSPECTIONS MONTHLY REPORT -
NATURE OF BUILDING PERMITS ISSUED
3291
0
0
.-
37
o
101
a.
.-
0
0
,,,
25
0'
0
r
..
47
12
1761
.-
YEAR -TO -DATE
VZ 1VINN31N30I8 ' 1 8 ' 1 1
8O 1V83Q3d ZO7£
ZBEET
14311
KWO:
00'IZ
SWIM POOL
OS'OZ
000'1
o3SI8d831N3 N3AV2
VZV1d )IIVNOV98
9TT# '08 AMVIIAOVIB OL17
88EE1
- --
W
W0:
OYES
--
05'1S
OWE
OD ONVI
S1 001 813 NMOI `1 fl '1 1
08 310000 33ANVA 0021
NUT
W0.
00'19
05'8'
005'7
__ °' '°
JNZ OL 813 N1101 '1 8 `Z 1
80 381N33 NMOI 00£1
66££1
ro
.-
W0:
00'19
.-•
OS'9
00`5
HHHOO WHVH3
QOV SS38.id3 'E 8 '8 1
O8 BONN 101Id 0££E
70E-El
.-
0'
W0:
OS'E8
05'6
OS`L
SST 813 NVOV3 '1 8 '1 1
OS 3AV NOIONIX31 05Z7
Z£££T
63,750
H01
SZ'SSZ
S
OS'£
00'0
181 1113 NVOV3 `1 8 '1 1
OS 3AV N01381X31 0527
'MET
Wal
110:
SZ'
S
05'0
09'0
; 7,282,000
Z U1883183312 'I 8 '1 1
80 1V83083 017E
SUET
183,090.95
1100
5S'
S8'10
OL'5
00`9
98A3O SV19VU '1 8 `1 9
O8 1138 83A1IS OZOZ
60EE1
NMI
1100
sr91
5
01'9 9Z
005'LE
dO0110
31VOOS 4803 OV3 '1 8 'Z 1
0V08 0110dV 0001
ZZEEI
IOU
8!ld
OS'
0
00' Z
99' L
49 009.951
33018 NNV8 ' 1 8 '1
AVM N11V8 7Z0Z
STET
1103
SZ'580'
S
O5'£
00'0
x( OL 813 NMOI '1 8 '1 1
80 3111N33 NMOI 6811
69EET
401.90
1103
SZ'8S5`
c ,Z'Z?
05'8
00`0
1,162.25
0NZ 8V0 3801 '1 8 '1 1
1d AVO 3801 0092
685£1
1100
SE'1S7 $
WEVI $
06'9
00'Z
L 1,.006.45
CZ 1338 '7S 8 '510 1
3AV N013NIX31 5117
88ZEi
1 114.50
1 _ -- 13,229.50
8333 IVIOI
8SEM
1 NVId
33A
III4H3d
NOIIVIIIVA
aanmo
1V031 1 8838QQV
li 111483d
3018
L8E
nmouvaaa ilmousuum
S80& SNO]
0
0
1d
N
t0
O
VI
0
m
v
0
n
H
a
CD 0 0 � N
1.- 0 c D1
• W '7 CJ c r
M 0
0
0'
00
O
M
A
0
PROTECTIVE INSPECTIONS MONTHLY REPORT -
NATURE OF BUILDING PERMITS ISSUED
3291
0
0
.-
37
o
101
a.
.-
0
0
,,,
25
0'
0
r
..
47
12
1761
.-
YEAR -TO -DATE
TOTALS
ADJUSTMENTS
HOUSE MOVES
DEMOLISH
MISCELLANEOUS
SWIM POOL
RES. ADDITIONS
RES. GARAGES
PUBLIC FACILITIES
INSTITUTIONAL
INDUSTRIAL
COMM /IND ADDITION
COMM /IND REMODEL
COMMERCIAL
AGRICULTURAL
, APT BLDGS
i CONDO
1
1
TOWNHOUSE
DUPLEX
SINGLE FAMILY
TYPE
, FOUNDATION
128
-
19
v.
ro
.-
.-•
10
n.,
r
.-
.-
0'
75
1 NO.
1
48,315,744
31,166,210
63,750
103,700
7,70o
597,660
20,000
126,400
19,442,000
2,000,000
778,000'
344,000
401,000
; 7,282,000
VALUATION
183,090.95
99,321.30
15.00
915.201
837.70
110.001
1,972.00J
163.50
1,086.00
1 44,765.40
6,814.00
2,468.00
1,235.50
2,324.50
36,614.50
PERMIT FEE
1 89,861.80
49 009.951
53.75
L 375.60
986.00
81.75
401.90
22,382.70
3,407.00
-_- 1,234.00
617.75
1,162.25
18,307.25
1
PLAN REV FEE
1 1,050,384.75
I 612_,_6J1.25
1 - 15.00
L 1,.006.45
1,267.30
1 114.50
1 _ -- 13,229.50
__5,085.25
I 1,552.40
234,009.60
136,789.00
27,595.00
11,835.25
13,899.25
186,212.75
TOTAL FEES
L8E
nmouvaaa ilmousuum
S80& SNO]
0
0
1d
N
t0
O
VI
0
m
v
0
n
H
a
CD 0 0 � N
1.- 0 c D1
• W '7 CJ c r
M 0
0
0'
00
O
M
A
0
PROTECTIVE INSPECTIONS MONTHLY REPORT -
NATURE OF BUILDING PERMITS ISSUED