Loading...
07/19/1988 - City Council RegularAGENDA REGULAR MEETING EAGAN CITY COUNCIL EAGAN, MINNESOTA MUNICIPAL CENTER BUILDING JULY 19, 1988 6:30 P.M. I. 6:30 - ROLL CALL & PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE (BLUE) ID./ II. 6:35 - ADOPT AGENDA & APPROVAL OF MINUTES (BLUE) III. 6:45 - DEPARTMENT HEAD BUSINESS (BLUE) IV. 6:55 - CONSENT AGENDA (PINK) T,Z A. PERSONNEL ITEMS � B. LICENSES, Plumbers �)_ C. LICENSES, Refuse Haulers 7' T 7 D. PROJECT 478, Receive Final Assessment Roll/Order Public Hearing (Lexington Hills Addition - Sanitary Sewer) E. PROJECT 479, Receive Final Assessment Roll/Order Public Hearing (Lexington/Northview - Trunk Storm Sewer) -p, 1 F. PROJECT 461, Receive Final Assessment Roll/Order Public Hearing (Yankee Doodle Rd - 35E to Lexington Ave) F. g G. CONTRACT 88-23, Receive Bids/Award Contract (Cliff Lake Center - Streets & Signals) p.10 H. CONTRACT 88-13, Approve Change Order #1 (Project 452 - Storm Sewer Schedule) -p •ib I. FINAL PLAT, Summerplace Addition JZ J. FINAL PLAT, Town Centre 100 Sixth Addition - . 14 K. CONTRACT 88-7, Award Contract (Ohmann, Winkler & Bridleridge Parks) T.l� L. RESOLUTION Prohibiting On -Street Parking for Relocated Portion of I Rahn Road at Cliff Lake Road •/q M. FINAL PLAT, Deerwood Addition .76 N. FINAL PLAT, Eagandale Lemay Lake 3rd Addition .7Z, O. CONTRACT 88-02, Receive Bids/Award Contract (1988 Sealcoating) F.2 q - P. PROJECT 544, Receive Feasibility Report/Order Public Hearing (Mallard Park 3rd Addition - Streetlighting) V. 7:00 - PUBLIC HEARINGS (SALMON) 1•2=5 A. VACATE Portion of Kennebec Drive Public Right of Way T),21 B. VACATE Portion of Rahn Road Public Right of Way VI. OLD BUSINESS (ORCHID) i-30 A. PRELIMINARY PLAT, Kings Wood 2nd Addition/James Horne, of 41.5 R- 1 (Single Family) Acres Located Between Pilot Knob Road and Hwy 35E, North of Deerwood Dr in NE1 of Sec 21 --P..51-1 B. COMPREHENSIVE GUIDE PLAN AMENDMENT, Solderholm Addition/Eagle Enterprises, PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AMENDMENT (REZONING) of 4.52 R-4 (Multiple) Acres Within the Lexington South Planned Development to a LB (Limited Business) District and a PRELIMINARY PLAT Containing Three Lots Located at the NW Intersection of Lexington Avenue and Diffley Road in SW1 of Sec 23 VI. ''(( OLD BUSINESS (continued) �.�`t C. LICENSE, Wine & Beer for New Owner of Eagan Tap, 3998 Sibley Memorial Hwy VII. NEW BUSINESS (TAN) A. SITE PLAN REVIEW, Landscape and Signage for Lone Oak Addition 2 .101 B. VARIANCE, 4739 Ridgewind Trail /Brian Skunberg, For a 4' Variance ( to the Rear Yard Setback at Lot 4, Block 3, Park Ridge 2nd Add F , 72_ C. WAIVER OF PLAT, William Huttner, to Allow a Conveyance of Land Located in SW1 of Sec 14, South of Birch St '7:3 D. COMPREHENSIVE GUIDE PLAN AMENDMENT, PLANNED DEVELOPMENT P AMENDMENT (REZONING), All Saints Lutheran Church Addition /Vanman Construction Co, and PRELIMINARY PLAT of Approximately Four Acres Zoned R -1 Within the Lexington South Planned Development to a PF (Public Facilities) District Within the Planned Development for a Church Site Located at SE Intersection of Lexington Avenue and Wescot road in NWT of Sec 23 p•/04 E . PRELIMINARY PLAT, Town Centre 70 Tenth Addition /Federal Land Co, of 1.91 CSC Zoned Acres an a CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT to Allow a Car Wash Facility and Motor Fuel Sales and a VARIANCE for a Canopy Setback Located on a Portion of Existing Outlot B, Town Centre 70 1st Addition or Proposed Outlot A, Town Centre 70 Ninth Addition Located Between Hwy 35E and Town Centre Drive in NWT of Sec 15 p .f2 F. COMPREHENSIVE GUIDE PLAN AMENDMENT, Rahncliff 2nd Addition /Austin Companies, REZONING of 16.08 LB (Limited Business) and RB (Roadside Business) Acres to a Commercial Planned Development District and a PRELIMINARY PLAT Located at SW Intersection of Cliff Road and Hwy 35E in NWT of Sec 32 - p, APPOINTMENT of Ad Hoc Senior Housing Site Selection Committee VIII. ADDITIONAL ITEMS (GOLD) IX. ADMINISTRATIVE AGENDA (GREEN) X. VISITORS TO BE HEARD (for those persons not on agenda) XI. ADJOURNMENT MEMO TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCILMEMBERS FROM: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES DATE: JULY 14, 1988 SUBJECT: AGENDA INFORMATION FOR JULY 19, 1988 CITY COUNCIL MEETING 'ADOPT°AGENDA APPROVE MINUTES After approval is given to the July 19, 1988 agenda and regular City Council meeting minutes for the July 5, 1988 meeting, the following items are in order for consideration: DEPARTMENT UEAD BUSINESS There are no items to be considered under Department Head Busi- ness. Agenda Information Memo July 19, 1988, City Council Meeting There are eleven (11)items on the agenda referred to as consent items requiring one (1) motion by the City Council. If the City Council wishes to discuss any of the items in further detail, those items should be removed from the Consent Agenda and placed under Additional Items unless the discussion required is brief. A. PERSONNEL ITEMS :CONSENT AGENDA, PERSONNEL ITEMS Item 1. Temporary Engineering Technician Position /Park and Recreation Department -- The City has received approximately fif- teen applications for the position of temporary engineering tech- nician in the Park and Recreation Department. Those applications are currently being screened. It is anticipated that interviews will occur the week of July 18, and it is possible that a can- didate could be ready to start with the City before the first Council meeting in August. Because of the heavy workload in this department, it would be appropriate to authorize the City Ad- ministrator to approve the hiring of a candidate for this tem- porary position if the successful candidate is able to start before the first Council meeting in August. If the successful candidate is not able to begin work before the first Council meeting in August, his /her name will be presented for approval at that meeting. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To authorize the City Ad- ministrator to approve the hiring of a temporary engineering technician for the Parks and Recreation Department if the successful candidate is able to begin working with the City before the first Council meeting in August. Item 2. Temporary Clerical Pool -- The City currently utilizes a "pool" of clerical workers who are temporary employees of the City and who fill in when regular employees are ill or on vaca- tion or when there is an extreme overload of work to be ac- complished. During the past year, a number of the workers in this pool have dropped out, mainly because they have found per- manent positions elsewhere. Therefore, the City proposes adding four workers to this temporary pool. Those persons are Barbara Haller, Nancy Hammel, Evelyn Moldenhauer, and Laurie Remer. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the hiring of Barbara Haller, Nancy Hammel, Evelyn Moldenhauer and Laurie Remer as temporary clerical workers for the City in the substitute "pool ". Agenda Information Memo July 19, 1988, City Council Meeting Item 3. Seasonal Streets Maintenance Workers -- The City has been notified by James Woodland, a seasonal streets maintenance worker, that he is resigning. Therefore, the Superintendent of Streets /Equipment is proposing a replacement for this worker. In addition, the Superintendent is proposing to hire the remaining budgeted seasonal streets worker at this time. After interviews, it is the recommendation of Superintendent Erhart that Bob Pilon and Jonathan Yates be hired as seasonal streets maintenance workers. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED AT THIS TIME: To acknowledge the resig- nation of James Woodland as a seasonal streets maintenance worker and to approve the hiring of Bob Pilon and Jonathan Yates as seasonal streets maintenance workers. Agenda Information Memo July 19, 1988, City Council Meeting PLUMBERS LICENSES B. Plumbers Licenses - -There are three (3) plumbers licenses that are in order for consideration: 1) Budget Plumbing Corporation, 2) Design Mechanical Services, Inc., 3) Gilbert Mechanical Contractors, Inc. These licenses have been reviewed by the appropriate staff and are found to comply with the City code regulations. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the three (3) plumbers licenses as presented. REFUSE HAULERS LICENSES C. Refuse Haulers Licenses - -Poor Richards, Inc. has applied for a refuse haulers license and is planning to operate two (2) trucks in the City. Enclosed on pages -6 through is a copy of the application. Since the City is currently reviewing a future curbside pickup program for the purpose of complying with the solid waste management legislation, each hauler that is licensed in the City is informed in writing that the City reserves the right to change its current hauling practice which may result in the licensing of fewer rubbish haulers within the community. A letter would be sent to Mr. Wybierala informing him of this possibility if his rubbish hauling license is approved. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve a rubbish haulers license for Poor Richards, Inc. as presented. 3830 Pilot Knob Road P.O. Box 21 -199 Eagan, NIN 55122 1 / Lot r hereby make application for (name) ftaa• v�ynA,,&ta) aIPOOR RICHARD'S INC TELEP If corporation or partnership: Name & address of partners or corporate officers: Municipalities presently licensed: Municipalities which have denied licenses to applicant: SSCHEDL NE= NUMBER: OF FEES AND ;REQUIREMENTS: CHECK CORRECT BLANK 1. PLUMBING & t'FSSPOOL INSTALLER & MN Master Plumbers License # OUTSIDE SEWER & WATER CONNECTIONS $2000.00 Bond & Certificate of Insurance. State Insurance No. State Bond No. 2. WATER SOFTNER LICENSE State Water Cond. Contractors License. No. $2000.00 Bond & Certificate of Insurance. 3. WELL DRILLERS LICENSE MN State License # $2000.00 Bond & Certificate of Insurance. 4. RUBBISH HAULERS LICENSE! $40.00 First Truck, $20.00 each additional truck. $2000.00 Bond & Certificate of Insurance. ENCLOSE SCHEDULE OF RATES ALSO. 5. CIGARETTE LICENSE $25.00 a year each machine. NUMBER OF MACHINES 6. KENNEL LICENSE MAKE CHECK PAYABLE TO: CITY OF EAGAN. Licenses are issued for a Calendar year period Jan. -Dec.) and there is NO PRORATED FEE on any license. Licenses will be issued to individuals or firms who are qualified for the particular license applied for. Failure to provide true and correct information shall constitute a violation of the ordinance in question and in addition to penalities, the license of any applicant may be revoked. OFFICE USE ONLY: LICENSE NO. DATE ISSUED: `77- 6333 . CITY: License for the year CITY: CITY OF EAGAN APPLICATION FOR LICENSE ADDRESS: 454 -8100 from the city of Eagan. -i STATE: Liao 2 :STATE: ZIP: 7/2/7ti > ZIP: 55 /6 / , / //¥ 7 rL4 ,d tO? .� 970 g ,ei (no -n..e-/ $50.00 Initial & $25.00 Renewal. 2oo '32icliazd entepile� 9izcopoated ENGINEERS IN BUILDING & PROPERTY MANAGEMENT WHERE SERVICE AND QUALITY WORKMANSHIP IS OUR MOST IMPORTANT PRODUCT CLARK & WHITALL STS. P. 0. BOX 17022 ST. PAUL, MN 55101 PHONE 776 -6333 aL yzAJA / /9:z 7najo_L,t vr_QJ awL, • 4/t.n_ex GerCAI — 377 - 083 q ,„4.„„e Agenda Information Memo Jaly 19, 1988, City Council Meeting PROJECT 478, RECEIVE FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL /ORDER PUBLIC HEARING (LEXINGTON HILLS ADD.- SANITARY SEWER) D. Project 478, Receive Final Assessment Roll /Order Public Hearing (Lexington Hills Addition - Sanitary Sewer) -- With the completion of the public improvements under the above - referenced project, final costs have been tabulated and the final assessment roll prepared allocating the assessable obligations to the benefitted properties. This roll is being presented to the City Council for their consideration of scheduling a formal public hearing to present these final costs to the affected property owners for formal adoption and certification to the County. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To receive the Final Assessment Roll for Project 478 (Lexington Hills Addition - Sanitary Sewer) and schedule a public hearing to be held on August 16, 1988. PROJECT 479, RECEIVE FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL /ORDER PUBLIC HEARING (LEXINGTON /NORTHVIEW -TRUNK STORM SEWER) E. Project 479, Receive Final Assessment Roll /Order Public Hearing (Lexington /Northview -Trunk Storm Sewer) -- With the completion of the public improvements under the above - referenced project, final costs have been tabulated and the final assessment roll prepared allocating the assessable obligations to the benefitted properties. This roll is being presented to the City Council for their consideration of scheduling a formal public hearing to present these final costs to the affected property owners for formal adoption and certification to the County. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To receive the final assessment roll for Project 479 (Lexington /Northview -Trunk Storm Sewer) and schedule a public hearing to be held on August 16, 1988. 7 Agenda Information Memo July 19, 1988, City Council Meeting PROJECT 461, RECEIVE FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL /ORDER PUBLIC HEARING (YANKEE DOODLE RD. -35E TO LEXINGTON AVE.) F. Project 461, Receive Final Assessment Roll /Order Public Hearing (Yankee Doodle Rd. - 35E to Lexington Ave.) -- With the completion of the public improvements under the above - referenced project, final costs have been tabulated and the final assessment roll prepared allocating the assessable obligations to the benefitted properties. This roll is being presented to the City Council for their consideration of scheduling a formal public hearing to present these final costs to the affected property owners for formal adoption and certification to the County. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To receive the Final Assessment Roll for Project 461 (Yankee Doodle Rd. - 35E to Lexington Ave.) and schedule a public hearing to be held on August 16, 1988. CONTRACT 88 -23, RECEIVE BIDS /AWARD CONTRACT (CLIFF LAKE CENTRE - STREETS & SIGNALS) G. Contract 88 -23, Receive Bids /Award Contract (Cliff Lake Centre - Streets & Signals -- On Friday, July 15, formal bids were received for the installation of the streets, signa and landscaping for the Cliff Lake Centre. Enclosed on page is a tabulation of the bids received with a comparison of the low bidder to the feasibility report estimate. All bids will be reviewed for their accuracy and completeness and any deviations will be addressed at the Council meeting on July 19th. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To receive the bids for Contract 88 -23 (Cliff Lake Centre - Streets & Signals) and award the contract to the lowest responsible bidder and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute all related documents. CLIFF LAKE CENTRE STREET CONSTRUCTION CITY PROJECT NO. 529A BID TIME: 10:30 A.M. BID DATE: FRIDAY, JULY 15, 1988 CONTRACTOR TOTAL BASE BID 1. S. M. Hentges $ 744,198.00 2. Bituminous Roadways, Inc. 756,976.46 3. Preferred Paving 761,791.80 4. McNamara Contracting Co. 767,362.00 5. Northwest Asphalt, Inc. 799,128.71 LOW BID $ 744,198.00 Feasibility Report Estimate (F.R.) $ 935,000.00 Engineer's Estimate (E.E.) $ 950,000.00 % Over ( +) Under ( -) F.R. - 20.4% % Over ( +) Under ( -) E.E. - 21.7% 9 Agenda Information Memo July 19, 1988, City Council Meeting CONTRACT 88 -13, APPROVE CHANGE ORDER #1 (PROJECT 452 -STORM SEWER SCHEDULE) H. Contract 88 -13, Approve Change Order #1 (Project 452 -Storm Sewer Schedule) -- On July 5th, the Council awarded Contract 88- 13 which provided for, among other things, the installation of a storm sewer outlet for Pond AP -50 by the Cedar Cliff Commercial Park 2nd Addition. Due to the City's inability to obtain a right of entry prior to the condemnation date of possession, a Change Order had to be prepared whereby the Contractor agrees to this new delayed date of possession without any additional costs or impact to the Contract. Therefore, this Change Order technically changes the schedule contained in the Contract documents to be more compatible with right of entry possession dates. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve Change Order #1 to Contract 88 -13 (Project 452 -Storm Sewer Schedule) and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute all related documents. FINAL PLAT, SUMMERPLACE ADDITION I. Final Plat, Summerplace Addition -- The staff has received an application for final plat approval for the Summerplace Addition located on the north side of Wilderness Run Road just west of Trapp Farm Park. A copy of the proposed final plat is contained on page // All final plat application materials have been submitted, reviewed by staff and found to be in order for favorable Council action. This final plat application is consistent with the preliminary plat approved by Council action on April 16, 1985. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the final plat for Summerplace Addition and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute all related documents. fi Agenda Information Memo July 19, 1988, City Council Meeting FINAL PLAT /TOWN CENTRE 100 SIXTH ADDITION J. Final Plat for Town Centre 100 Sixth Addition - -The final plat for Town Centre 100 Sixth Addition was placed on the special City Council agenda for the July 12, 1988 meeting. It was realized at that meeting that an amendment to the Planning and Development Agreement is necessary as a condition to final plat approval. That document has been prepared and is awaiting final signatures, which should be satisfied prior to the meeting on Tuesday. All other requirements such as a letter of credit, developmept agreement, and other documents are in order for consideration. (p. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the final plat for Town Centre 100 Sixth Addition. x■•••11E=K. 1 .■•••■,NIONI a k 1;i: I iii! 3 on 17.111: 0 3 4-! V1J ti 12, it 1 i Is - : 00 1 : ,- = .... 1 0 1 = :■ _. i li 0 iJ - ■i• r. .... 1 1 1 i :1 i t7.4P rii ! ...1 ' At: x si. i : 7. :„1"' ,.... .._... -... :L ,‘ \• 1, 11 : 1 i a: I ,,,g 4, I \ I. \ • 7 . ii 11 1 i 7 i. I t. I 11 1 .7 I -.. 3 iii.i. T•,1 ."-.--:--...----.— i I: I El I 1 1 1 .1 I ) ..- .,:. ......,..,..,..- ,,/ ...-% 4. I I I I il a 1.1 /3 a • 0 a: n % 0 ....,„. • ••--- -- - 1 -- - .- &....... 0 6 : 4 V -...- .3._ ... .......,4„,,... ;.. . 1 I ! l N I. ;... 1 1 i ',1-' ! 1 Cli I I . •,.. i t ! . iii: 1: ill ' : • . 7 ... 1 \ I J 0 ..-..-.:.-..-;;1„, "-- 2:r-L - - ..,... 4-.4/, - t — „,- —t--.. : TT 3 C.) 0 Agenda Information Memo July 19, 1988, City Council Meeting CONTRACT 88 -7, AWARD CONTRACT K. Contract 88 -7, Award Contract for Ohmann, Winkler, Jackson and Bridle Ridge Parks - -A bid opening was held on July 11, 1988 for the purpose of reviewing bid totals for the improvement of Ohmann Park, Winkler Jackson Park, and Bridle Ridge Park. For a copy of the Summary Bid Award and memo from our Park Planner, refer to page /� . The Parks and Recreation Department is recommending the low bidder, Central Landscaping, at a base bid amount of $237,060.93 and to accept alternate No. 1 in the amount of $6,500.00. The engineer's estimate for the base bid is $274,500.00. Alternate No. 1 involves the cost for utility main and electrical installation at Ohmann Field to allow for the construction of an irrigation system in the future for the four (4) soccer fields. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the low bid to Central Landscaping for the base bid amount of $237,060.93 and alternate No. 1 in the amount of $6,500.00. DATE: JULY 13, 1988 RE: AWARD CONTRACT IMPROVEMENT CONTRACT 88 -7 PARK CONSTRUCTION Central Landscaping W.J. Ebertz Co. Barber Construction Matt Bullock Contracting Enebac Construction Carl Bolander & Sons cc: Ken Vraa 7/ MEMORANDUM TAO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL . , FROM: STEPHEN SULLIVAN, PARK PLANNER Sealed bids were opened on July llth for construction of Ohmann Park,Winkler Jackson Park and Bridleridge Park. Twenty (20) contractors received plans and specification with six (6) submitting bids. The bid totals are as follows: Base Bid Alt. #1 Alt. #2 Alt. #3 $237,060.93 6,500.00 10,575.00 18,000.00 246,903.30 6,000.00 11,000.00 12,000.00 261,699.20 6,600.00 11,300.00 25,500.00 270,141.50 6,000.00 12,000.00 21,000.00 274,980.67 6,400.00 13,000.00 10,500.00 291,891.40 7,900.00 13,500.00 22,500.00 The base bid includes 1st and 2nd phase construction within the three (3) parks. Alternate #1 and #2 represents irrigation at Ohmann Park. Alternate #3 is for the irnport of topsoil. The engineers estimate for the base bid is $274,500.00. The lower bid amounts are typically based on a decrease in grading costs. It appears that contractors are looking for work and the competitive bid amounts reflect this. The low bidder is Central Landscape with a base bid of $237,060.93. Staff has reviewed their bid amount for Alternate #1 of $6,500.00 and feels it a good value. Alternate #2 is also a good value but can be implemented utilizing City and volunteer forces resulting in a net saving of $10,575.00. Alternate #3 for topsoil irnport is bid at $6.00 /cubic yard. This is a typical unit price. Staff feels that the alternate should not be included within the contract, allowing adequate time to explore cost saving alternatives. Staff feels that topsoil can be located at a lower cubic yard price. Therefore, once found, a change order would be necessary to include this future topsoil borrow alternative. Central Landscaping has been awarded the three (3) previous parks contracts. The contractor has always met contractual obligations, is sensitive to parks and works cooperatively with the staff. ACTION: To award Improvement Contract 88 -7 to Central Landscape Inc. including Alternate #1 for the amount of $243,560.93. Agenda Information Memo July 19, 1988, City Council Meeting APPROVE RESOLUTION /RAHN ROAD L. Approve Resolution Prohibiting On- Street Parking - Rahn Road (New Alignment) - -With the realignment of Rahn Road and its new intersection with the new Cliff Lake Road, there is a requirement to prohibit on- street parking along this realignment curve in order to accommodate the appropriate turn lane designs necessary to meet Municipal State Aid Plan approval. Therefore, the Resolution enclosed on page / is being presented for their favorable consideration and act on. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve a Resolution prohibiting on- street parking for the relocated portion of Rahn Road. CITY OF EAGAN NO PARKING RESOLUTION Street City Proj. # From To Rahn Road 529 Cliff Lake Road 630 Ft. Northerly (MSA 101) (MSA 124) THIS RESOLUTION, passed the day of , 1988, by the City of Eagan in Dakota County, Minnesota. The Municipal corporation shall hereinafter be called the "City ". WHEREAS, these improvements do not provide adequate width for parking on both sides of Rahn Road (MSA 101), approval of the proposed construction as a State Aid Street Project must therefore be conditioned upon certain parking restrictions, and WHEREAS, the extent of these restrictions that would be a necessary prerequisite to the approval of this construction as a State Aid project in the "City" has been determined. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED that the "City" shall ban the parking of motor vehicles on both sides of Rahn Road from Cliff Lake Road (MSA 124) to 630 feet northerly. Motion made by: Seconded by: Those in favor: Those against: Da t ed : /7 CITY OF EAGAN CITY COUNCIL By: Attest: CERTIFICATION I, E. J. VanOverbeke, Clerk of the City of Eagan, Dakota County, Minnesota, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution as duly passed and adopted by the City Council of the City of Eagan, Dakota County, Minnesota, in a regular meeting thereof assembled this day of , 1988. E. J. VanOverbeke, City Clerk Agenda Information Memo July 19, 1988, City Council Meeting FINAL PLAT APPROVAL /DEERWOOD ADDITION M. Final Plat Approval, Deerwood Addition - -The staff has received an application for final plat approval for the Deerwood Addition located in the southwest corner of Pilot Knob Road and Deerwood Drive as shown by the plat map contained on page All conditions of the preliminary plat approval by Council c ion of October 20, 1987 have been satisfactorily complied with. All other final plat applications have been submitted, reviewed by staff and found to be in order for favorable Council action. However, additional review of this subdivision indicates an apparent need for a trailway connection from the subdivision to Pilot Knob Road. The Developer has expressed some hesitation in dedicating this easement and constructing a bituminous trailway providing for this interconnection because of safety concerns relating to children crossing Pilot Knob Road at this location. The staff has reviewed this situation and feel that with the attraction of the existing Hilltop Plaza Shopping Center, the internal future residents will not want to walk an extra 2,500+ feet to Deerwood Drive and back south again and will resort to creating their own pathway to the Pilot Knob Road trailway. While this issue was not specifically a condition of final plat approval, the staff feels that its merits warrant consideration along with final plat approval at this time. If it is determined that it is necessary to provide good pedestrian circulation to the trailway network system, final plat approval should be contingent upon the dedication of the appropriate easements and the construction of the sidewalk /trailway itself. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the final plat for Deerwood Addition with /without additional trailway requirement and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute all related documents. • • 4. . • • •• • • ...... . ••• • • 1•••• 11. . ENGSTROMS DEERWOOD ADDITION • -:- , • ... • „ •*, • „r•J ••• ... • :77.."7. • - 1 11 . •••••• • '.% I .• . , • • IQ • ••••-"- ; - 1$ 11 • • \ - •••••e • : •• 4•••••• . „ ••••••••••• • •• •• .•::•••■••■•• . • •sliae. • .0; ••• I' , •:•:-.•..:::. • ' i........- ..,,.- . • • • s. , -4.. •,?..- r -.:,.r.., , . „ 2 ,y.,1...1% ..... .4 , , ••,%. , - , . . r •-... k ., i II ;', I 2.::-,-..-. t :-... • •\:.. . ... . . • • sV . • .... .'' ..": --- -.::- 23 - , .. _,' ...,' 111.• • ... a • ...... ion .••••••• . • .•••• • • „. • a• • • • • • •• I • • • EXHIBIT A • 1 --:.- 1 -;? ' - % , .. to , , f 11 i- I '• 1 1 ' ' 11 . N ••■•,,,.-••••4, ... r . .. I a il s• a .... A ) :*.•••. :, .... ... •.). ) .1% 1 1 •• ......,.. . , r,, 4.6. . .. 4 . .., , 4••••••• •10 41 ,,I . , ....r•.,..■ .• • , 1 !......,,,,•:..„..„ , .1mm •‘, • . ' ,11. • •• ! • •• • ,. • • 1 V ••• 1 . ..... ......:•••••• , 4 `Y.'s. 1 ,.. • -•• . 4 ...;•4• a , ...1...7 ( 1.',.......1 . : 6. ,.f• ,.‘ ''''''' 4 2 •,,,, --.....- - "S'1. ' „,„, "•:,, •,••• . :''• 4. ,.. ,,........,Z • •• • • • •••••- • ■• •• „ • 4 46449 1 • r ./ r OuTLOT A • • r■• • ■ .•.:•••• • . . • 4 %, • • 4.0 .* .• • `• °. ..„: . / 4 '''' r. - r 2 " ) • s.. . % ■ • • .1 1 t. •••!, •••■•• 110/1111•11116 •••••••••••:".. 1•1 •-s r • 21 i••• •■■ 1 4 - i ;• 11 1 .. .r • ••• : .: • " 1 31 , . . /,,..--.• r.• .1 • 7 •`. 26 .' :. a • .‘ a 3 e■ 31 ''.. '.... a , , • , 2) %,:• :. s Yi k .• ) • . , a 0.. ,, . ,,, .,,...,,---------------_-- ,:,. ., , • , r ....... ' ''''' 21 ...:4...•. '....: ,:t* 21 I, 1 3 ---- -...-------, .. ., 30 .• 3 j, • •.`1 ', i • . • ' f ' -••• r .: .4. 3, ,. • , ' u . N., 4:‘, : • t .N.S . 1•1 : .:# ..;%;,•,,,- ............; I, • ....., ) / .--;,..,......../: • 3.3 • • 44 , /1. ... „ . al• . ' .1% ...t " o • •• -• ••- t' • „... ,, i • , .--• ... ,, ,.. 1 .. ' " I I) I . l %. ...•... 1 .1 ./ "` . .1; ' N .., .. .. ••••■••• f t • 16 A, t. •• • -2•-• 4, I • ••":.--.-- i -..._' ..:••••:„, 33 1 ••• '■""---______ a t • • .• .. 1 ` .. 33 -•., r f dl ..„. /-"•••••• • .• • 4 ..' 1 i e . : -,..... . ...„. i.... • 4 • • " -.4 - _ ; • 1 i • • ,r....., ..• •., • i ;1 2 ' . • A , -,.. I:: ;I - - -r.'-'., ./. s ‘..... 1 a . 6 • ::1.••• .....1„ ,. a •• • - ----.-.- z...„.:. • ., .• t .1 .., , ... \ ,,,, ;., 1 4 1 r • • ; . .......... t' . 1 .', I .: -'••:•:"...,:-... ' I I . ...,„. • • :-._ ' -5 - , ...,. • 1..,. - :-..-,.. _ • • • .„,, 1 .. ,,,,. . Is ......,..,.;! / , ,,,"...._ ... ....„:" .. 1„ --- , -- .. . i...,,, •--- •.,.. •- • • •• • Cf. • • 4 4. ....it • *. " .4 ''...1' • • • g ••••• I '01.: ''' " ,.. • - •"'-'.7:::;/...: z•- - - ....... .. '''' ' a ` ....P ,-:*•• - • ::.7. -.•• ..--.- - ••• - - - -• ..... ; 1.. '„ :' .4.r • .......• c.• -.4 „A 16 • .- . :' -. • i 2 N , %.:. ...I .• 1 ., : f ' .1 • 11 ,l 1 , , 10 ' 11 • a 1 ..1 13 1 . 13 , 1.• • , ., ... .:,,•• 4.. 4 c 1 \'' V• / s 1.1 Si•. ......,! l'•%J.■ . , ... %.• J '... .. .i.'. _ ..•••■• • 4....••• ■ ... VI. ...7 a. ........ 3 ..... -...... -4 4.- •••....= ••:"•44.••• 1 I Wail l • ••• 4 atI.• 1.4.1. (Y o• 1•1• •:/•:11 la Li. X '" 7 --••• " 2 • • r • , ....... 21 Al' ,• • y 14 11 • .; • . • to••L Agenda Information Memo July 19, 1988, City Council Meeting FINAL PLAT, EAGANDALE LEMAY LAKE 3RD ADDITION N. Final Plat, Eagandale Lemay Lake 3rd Addition - -The staff has received an application for final plat approval for the above - referenced subdivision located south of Lone Oak Road and west of I -35E adjacent to the Residence Inn and Lemay Lake Apartment complexes. Enclosed on page 74 is a copy of the final plat. All conditions placed on the preliminary plat approval by Council action of June 7, 1988 have been satisfactorily complied with. All final plat application materials have been submitted, reviewed by staff and found to be in order for favorable Council action. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the final plat for the Eagandale Lemay Lake 3rd Addition and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute all related documents. 1,0 Ei 1 1 1 1 9 1 1 Agenda Information Memo July 19, 1988, City Council Meeting CONTRACT 88 -02 /RECEIVE BIDS /AWARD CONTRACT (1988 SEAL COATING) 0. Contract 88 -02, Receive Bids /Award Contract (1988 Seal Coating) - -On Friday, July 15th, formal bids were received for the annual seal coating of our local streets. Enclosed on page 3 is a tabulation of the bids received with the comparison of the low bid to the approved 1988 budget. All bids will be reviewed and checked for accuracy and compliance with specifications. Unless a problem is identified at the Council meeting, it would be appropriate to award the Contract to the low bidder. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To receive the bids for Contract 88 -02 (1988 Seal Coating) and award the Contract to Asteck Inc. in the amount of $115,923.63 and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute all related contract documents. Astach Allied FA -2 .264 sq. yd. - $84,366.28 CONTRACT 88 -02 1988 SEALCOAT BIDS .274 sq. yd. - $87,562.18 .414 sq. yd. - $32,661.70 Bituminous .295 sq. yd. - $94,273.15 .44 sq. yd. - $34,712.92 Roadways Low Bid Budget Amount Percentage under Budget Budget Amount - $126,000 - $115,923.68 - $126,000.00 - 7.99% Z3 FA -3 .40 sq. yd. - $31,557.20 TOTAL $115,923.68 $120,223.88 $128,986.07 Agenda Information Memo July 19, 1988, City Council Meeting PROJ.544 /RECEIVE FEASIBILITY REPORT /ORDER PUBLIC HEARING (MALLARD PARK 3RD ADD.- STREET LIGHTING) P. Project 544, Receive Feasibility Report /Order Public Hearing (Mallard Park 3rd Addition - Street Lighting) - -In response to a petition received by the residents within the subdivision, the Council authorized the preparation of a feasibility report for the installation of street lights. This report has now been completed and is being presented to the Council in consideration of scheduling a formal public hearing to present the cost estimates to the affected property owners. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To receive the feasibility report for Project 544 (Mallard Park 3rd Addition - Street Lighting) and schedule a public hearing to be held on August 16, 1988. Agenda Information Memo July 19, 1988, City Council Meeting PUBLIC HEARINGS VACATE PORTION OF KENNEBEC DRIVE PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY A. Vacation Portion of Kennebec Drive Public Right -of -way -- In response to the requests submitted by the applicant on Page 'z the Council scheduled a public hearing to be held to vacate a portion of the old abandoned dedicated right -of -way at Kennebec Drive as shown by the sketch and description contained on Page All notices have been published in the legal newspaper and sent to all potentially affected utility companies informing them of this public hearing. As of this date, the staff has not received any objections to this proposed request. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To close the public hearing and approve the vacation of a portion of Kennebec Drive public right -of -way as described and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute all related documents. May 27, 1988 Mr. Bruce Allen Engineering Technician City of Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55121 Dear Mr. Allen: In the fall of 1986, I purchased the apartment buildings known as Silver Bell Apartments located at 2091 and 2095 Silver Bell Road, Eagan. Immediately upon purchase, I hired a sign company to install a monument sign at the entrance to the buildings - -at the time of purchase, there was no sign. After the sign was designed, we applied for a sign permit. When we were told that the proposed location was an abandoned street, we were not initially concerned - -we thought we could post a bond to cover any removal of the sign and still get our permit. Twenty months later, we are still trying to install the sign. We are planning a tasteful sign that will enhance the appearance of the buildings and compliment the new shopping center directly across the street. No one at City Hall has expressed any opposition to our sign. The only issue has been whether we can obtain a sign permit without the street being vacated. A few weeks ago, I was told that the City would not grant a permit until the street was vacated. I am writing this letter to request that the City vacate the street so I can install a sign which will enable the residents to identify their home to their invited guests. I have had some indication the City is contemplating vacating only that portion of Kennebec Drive south of the easement. I would prefer that Kennebec be vacated on both sides of the easement. Our original plan was to install a monument sign south of the easement with the intention of installing a matching ornamental wall to give the entrance to the apartments a balanced look. Enclosed is my check in the amount of $300.00. Please let me know if there is anything I can do to expedite this matter. Very truly yours, G RICHARD T. CURTIN G25RTCgmw0527881 London Company 7421 West Shore Drive Edina, MN 55435 (0) 925 -6282 (H) 785 -2769 !h -- &fE\fER EXISTING BUILDING • �ti ■ KMRANT 'GATE ' • ' _ '4 �F _ O \ M VALVES WATER MAIN SEE NOTE SE CORNER OF LOT 1 86 -IC6 128/54 t 27, R.23 5.18 0.1F AREA TO BE VACATED RIGHT -OF -WAY TO BE VACATED All that part of Kennebec Drive lying northwesterly of Minnesota Department of Transportation Right -of -Way Plat No. 19 -8 and southwesterly of a line, said line described as follows: z 7 - ReA Beginning at the easterly corner of Outlot 1, Silver Bell Addition, Dakota County, Minnesota, thence continuing southeasterly along the Rortheast lot line of said Outlot 1 to a point on the northwesterly line of MNDOT Right -of -Way 19 -8 and there terminating. Agenda Information Memo July 19, 1988, City Council Meeting VACATE PORTION OF RAHN ROAD PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY B. Vacate Portion of Rahn Road Right of Way- - approval of the Cliff Lake Centre development and the to construct Cliff Lake Road and its intersection Road, additional right of way beyond what existed for Rahn Road intersection with Cliff Road was required. With the realignment of Rahn Road to its intersection with the new Cliff Lake Road construction, a portion of existing Rahn Road, adjacent to Rahn Park, is being abandoned. As a part of the agreement for the acquisition of the additional right of way from the Federal Land property near the intersection with Cliff Road, it is proposed to vacate a portion of Rahn Road and to reconvey a portion of Outlot B of the Cliff Lake Centre as ;partial offsetting compensation for the additional right of way dedication from Federal Land. Through this agreement, Federal Nand has committed to providing future park maintenance access to Rahn Park from the internal development at a location other than the existing Rahn Road right of way. To retain the street right of way for Rahn Road in the vicinity adjacent Federal Land would create traffic congestion and circulation problems at the first intersection north of Cliff Road. The City has existing utilities located within this Rahn Road right of way. Therefore, although the public street right of way is being vacated, it is staff's recommendation that utility and sidewalk easements be retained. The vacation of this public right of way will then minimize any impacts on future setbacks for the development of the Federal Land property. Enclosed on page is a map and description of the to be vacated also eferencing the additional right of acquired from Federal Land for Cliff Lake Road. With the requirement with Cliff the present property way being All notices have been published in the legal newspaper and sent to all potentially affected public utilities informing them of this public hearing. As of this date, the staff has received concerns to retain utility easements over this 80' right of way to incorporate existing utilities for both the City and private utility companies. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To close nearing and approve the vacation of a portion of Rahn right of way as described and authorize the Mayor and to execute all related documents. z g the public Road public City Clerk z� 0 N N U T ▪ J U CO T U -. U N C C J l- a U C C CC O - J 3 T T 7 U J O E O ^ U J .. O U 1- J U U N ur c7 C J T ,..., ca r•, ca J J u N J J G :c7 o U— M c U c U J U C - • ;,S L C,i w 0 U C C V G. J U C Z C J s.: _ Cr ✓ 0 CJ ^ C)) .G :J U Z J J C J N .7 L•- 0 . N •� U .7 U .L U L. u 0 U c7 G 3 c7 CO 0 C _. _ U C N O L f1 -- U ▪ N C1 J C - C "C C U :J N rd L U U •.. U CC 0 CO E C C C _^ J C,$ U C • J , U C N • C • N ,.... W c7 W C O U 0 C O C T O` J L c7 :J • J N G O U O •- 0 Z ▪ U 1.■ U r• Z C O CC C J: M 0 C. G r-. M U CC r` •- N 0 U .G C N J u .J C J U - cc n., o r ▪ a u L G GI C S .- Cr) • .. •^. 0 .0 0 E N U C 0 N "C 1J H C U O O T U C U 3 :n - J C 3 CJ J 4 C U J L. O N U e-• "C C U U ^ F U U • - U c. U L... W F. c7 .- Cn O L. ^ 0 0 C N 1- J O O .L 7-1 -J �J L' C N 0 O J L N CO G C C c7 U C U C •'- O U C .7 3 cO u O -- 07 G O o u .. •, r` ..4 L C U U ,-X N }.J :J .I U • - -C C 3 U N W U ,-. J J c U O U U Ob cn C N - cn 3 • • 4 J W —, U ca W N E 'C W 0 W U U N O ca 0 1:1:7-4 �+ •.+ W O .0 C "u .- 3 v c0 J ca 1-+ c7 LJ C U N 1 s J CO C.) c --, .-� C Q n0 N C U U 3 C •.c J.J O ▪ f.. ... u .- U O .-• .- U CO O M . � , ,•-a X i 7 U CJ ctl .J G Z %. u O O ." O J.J O t7 W .--+ 1ti 1J T L 0 N .-+ U G J U N -4 J) CJ C7 U CO u N S- ca b C.) 0 .0 G O u 3 C,) w •. .0 .L u J . L , ; ca J J �. 0 C W 1.J J N N O • 0 ▪ cn N C O O ▪ C W C/; Z CO 0 1J "" C / 0 0 0 U U 1-, U U U U C V ..O U U U u U U ,JC U •-, C c7 W U ..0 U Cn 0 J C 0 U W „C, :.J C •-4 0 C .-+ U 0 = O 'C 0 +.J J --. `J C C J S. N c7 1J CO :J c7 • W C7 4- T c ^ •--c 0 O CO VS ... .a l : N CO N 1•. G C :J • CJ O U T G Cy u U ••• :•J `-• U C. > L .-, . U O G N C N U U u G N C c7 U U J C .0 CO 3 .L u U U E G C O J G J C E E C ••• u o C u O O c: T .L O O •- O .0 U E G 4_10 .� E-+ N U Z •- u 0 >na4*??pay'7aay�: s �?r 4 ^A4i +? i ,?'� , ;+.dJsh`Tr7'nYE �.- '. .,rte - - -- _ Agenda Information Memo July 19, 1988, City Council Meeting OLD BUSINESS PRELIMINARY PLAT /KINGSWOOD 2ND ADDITION A. Preliminary Plat for Kings Wood 2nd Addition /James Horne, of 41.5 Acres Single Family - -At the June 21, 1988 City Council meeting the Kings Wood 2nd Addition Development Project consisting of a Comprehensive Guide Plan amendment, a rezoning and a preliminary plat were considered by the City Council. Action was taken to approve the Comprehensive Guide Plan amendment from a D -II to a D -I and the rezoning of 41.5 R -1 single family acres. Due to the uncertainty of the location for the access road to serve a proposed community center east of Pilot Knob Road and the proposed Kings Wood 2nd Addition and proper time to allow engineering to best evaluate a good access alignment for public safety movement, the item was continued to the July 5 or July 12 meetings for further consideration. On July 5, the preliminary plat for the Kingswood 2nd Addition was continued until the July 19 meeting to provide additional time for the City to review the proposed development of the Civic Center property for the proposed Community Center to determine projected future traffic impacts on the location of the future intersection with Pilot Knob Road. By County standards, the intersection of the Kings Wood 2nd Addition and the future Civic Center development must match. On July 7 and 8, the architectural team of Hastings and Chivetta met with various City staff, Commissions and Council to review the proposed site and related internal circulations. Enclosed on pages .=!;/ and ,57/ is a memo from the Director of Parks & Recreation regarding the alternative locations of this major cross intersection in relationship to the site development of the Civic Center property. Also enclosed on page% ..3� through is a copy of a memo from the Director of Public Works regarding the impact of the intersection location with this County road. The appropriate City staff will be reviewing this issue with the developer and his representatives at a meeting on Monday, July 18, to further discuss the necessity for and impact of the location of this mutual intersection of Kings Wood Addition and Civic Center property with Pilot Knob Road. Verbal reports will be presented at the Council meeting regarding the status of the preliminary plat as submitted and any potential additional requirements of approval that may be necessary. Enclosed on pages ed4 through 6g is background information previously submitted with this item at the July 5 meeting for the Council's information and review regarding this item. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve /deny the preliminary plat for the Kings Wood 2nd Addition and the related rezoning application with the appropriate conditions as necessary. MEMORANDUM TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL TOM HEDGES, CITY ADMINISTRATOR FROM: KEN VRAA, DIRECTOR OF PARKS AND RECREATION DATE: JULY 12, 1988 RE: KINGSWOOD 2ND ADDITION BACKGROUND As you are aware, the design team for the Community Center from Hastings and Chivetta Architects spent last Thursday and Friday in Eagan to begin work on the project. A portion of their effort here was devoted to our overall site planning including the impact of future expansion of the Eagan City Hall, removal of the Police (north access on Pilot Knob Road) parking lot expansion and, of course, the size of the footprint for the Community Center. Or Friday afternoon, an informal "presentation" was made on the work product. Mayor Ellison and Councilman Wachter were able to attend this review session with City Staff. (A written report will be prepared by the architects ccncerning their work. Copies will be made available to the Council when the report is received.) HORNE 2ND ADDITION As it relates to road access, the design team reviewed several possible alternatives for access and internal road alignments, including that of an access from Rocky Lane. Given the size of the footprint for the Community Center, usable /developable space of approximately 14 acres, need for access to Westcott Road and City Hall expansion, it was the architects recommendation that the best access would be one that aligned with Coronation Court rather than Kingswood or Rocky Lane. (Although a graphic was prepared showing this, it was not reproducable. It is my understanding that planning staff will be developing a graphic to help illustrate the recommendation of the architects.) r STAFF COMMENTS Until the analysis and review by the architect, this writer did not have a "preferred" or "personal choice" as to which road access was to be recommended, only to make sure that a review was done to insure that an informed decision regarding the access was made. Having now had the opportunity to understand the size of the building footprint, affects of providing parking as well as developing a better understanding and appreciation for the probable size for expansion of City Hall, I am now taking a position, as your Director of Parks and Recreation, in recommending that the preferred access to the Community Center site from Pilot Knob Road be located across from Coronation Court. 3v MEMO TO: THOMAS L HEDGES, CITY ADMINISTRATOR FROM: THOMAS A COLBERT, DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS DATE: JULY 15, 1988 SUBJECT: KINGS WOOD 2ND ADDITION - PRELIMINARY PLAT RECOMMENDATION FOR ROADWAY ACCESS LOCATION (PILOT KNOB RD) With the original applicaton of the proposed Kings Wood„Addition, the Public Works Department identified the potential problem associated with using the existing Kings Wood Drive intersection with Pilot Knob Road as the main entrance for the ultimate development of the James Horne property. These concerns related to the proximity of this intersection with the existing Rocky Lane intersection servicing the Skovdale #2 Addition and the recently approved Cutters Ridge I and II Additions. The offset of these intersections do not meet proper County spacing guidelines necessary to provide adequate left -turn movements from the proposed center turn lane to be constructed with the upgrading of Pilot Knob Road. Further compounding this substandard offset of intersections is the proposed development of the Civic Center property on the east side of Pilot Knob Road. After reviewing various alternatives for internal traffic circulation and the traffic volumes to be generated by the ultimate expansion of the Municipal Center combined with the proposed Community Center development, dictates that the existing Kings Wood Road intersection be relocated to the north opposite the Coronation Court cul -de -sac to provide better spacing minimizing traffic safety problems associated with the inadequate left -turn designs associated with the existing Kings Wood Road intersection. Mr. Horne has indicated that requiring this relocation of their main entrance to be opposite the Coronation Court cul -de -sac will result in street grades that exceed City standards. Preliminary review of the proposed grading plans and Pilot Knob Road future elevations indicate that there should be no problems in designing the streets within the proposed Kings Wood 2nd Addition to conform to City standards. Subsequently, it is the Public Works Department position that the proposed access for the Kings Wood 2nd Addition be relocated to the north opposite the Coronation Court cul -de -sac. This recommendation is strongly supported by the Dakota County traffic engineer from the extent that it will greatly enhance the traffic operations of this County road and the significant turning movements anticipated through this intersection. If additional information or clarification regarding this issue would be helpful, please let me know. Director of Public Works ' TAC /jj cc: Mike Foertsch, Assistant City Engineer Pete Sorenson, Dakota County Traffic Engineer 33- TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL TOM HEDGES, CITY ADMINISTRATOR\ 16)7ROM: KEN VRAA, DIRECTOR OF PARKS & RECREATION DATE: JUNE 14, 1988 SUBJECT: KINGSWOOD 2ND ADDITION At the Advisory Parks and Recreation Commission meeting of June 2nd, the Commission reviewed the proposed Kingswood, 2nd Addi- tion. Of concern to the Commission is that this plat will determine the access to the future Community Center as a result of the County's requirement of having road intersection align and for meeting access spacing requirements. Further, the County is expected to eliminate the existing access on Pilot Knob Road, which now serv- ices the Police /Municipal Center. Staff was not able to respond to questions pertaining to how various road access alternatives might affect the Community Center; this is an issue for the architects to review and analyze for impact. Due to the fact that the architectural firm has had little opportunity to become involved in the project; it is premature to expect a response. The firm could perhaps, make a preliminary recommendation by July; however the more information covering the Community Center needs - and the needs of the Municipal Center; the better and more confident the response. Therefore, the Commission has recommended that the Community Cen- ters architectural firm review the site access issue and attempt to respond by the July Commission meeting and /or the July 19th, City Council meeting; and that an approval of the Kingswood Second Addition be deferred by the City Council until a recom- mendation is rendered by the architects as to road access. KV /bls cc: Dale Runkle, City Planner MEMORANDUM 1/4.11 yr c.t�uc�v SUBJECT: COMPREHENSIVE GUIDE PLAN AMENDMENT, REZONING, PRELIMINARY PLAT (KINGS WOOD 2ND ADDITION) APPLICANT: JAMES HORNE LOCATION: NE 1/4 OF SECTION 21 EXISTING ZONING: R -1 (SINGLE - FAMILY) & AG (AGRICULTURAL) DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: MAY 26, 1988 DATE OF REPORT: MAY 20, 1988 REPORTED BY: PLANNING AND ENGINEERING DEPARTMENTS APPLICATION SUMMARY: Separate applications have been submitted requesting a Rezoning and Preliminary Plat for the Kings Wood 2nd Addition. This proposal incorporates the previously approved Kings Wood 1st Addition (1964) and unplatted agricultural land that abuts Highway 35E to the west into a mixed -use Planned Development consisting of 61 single - family lots on 30.4 acres, two Outlots containing 23 townhouse lots on 9.8 acres, and one 1.4 acre Outlot for General Business uses. This plat also includes a small portion of the Cutters Ridge Addition in the southeast portion of the site. The City's most recent Land Use Plan designates this area as D -II (0 -6 units per acre); therefore, an Amendment will be necessary. EXISTING CONDITIONS /SITE PLAN: This steeply rolling site is heavily wooded and contains some large birch massings that are unique to this area. In an effort to retain as many as possible, individual lot grading is being proposed. This will also encourage upper- bracket housing that is being proposed in the single- family area. A large ponding area physically separates the northern corners of the site from each other, as well as the north from the south. The area to the south (Cutter's Ridge Addition) has received Preliminary Plat approval and the Final Plats are anticipated in the near future. Meritor Development . owns the land to the north zoned LB (Limited Business) and the parkland within the Blackhawk Park Planned Development. They have been included in the overall planning of the area since the outlot areas to the north will have to be served by roadways extending through their property. The old City Hall building and Fire Administration building are also to the north. Currently there are two homes on the property - the one on the south will be platted as an Exception; the Horne homesite on the ncrth will be platted as a lot. The Hornes have beers operating a hcme occupation for a number of years. Their intent is to ccnstruct a building on the proposed General Business Outlot that will be serviced from the single - family area cul -de -sac and, potentially, the old City Hall site. It is doubtful that the County will allow full access for one commercial lot directly peen satisriea. rtne townhouse and commercial outlots have been reviewed and they have the ability to develop as proposed, adhering to all Code requirements. Meritor intends to rezone their property to the north from LB to R -1. Included in the packet is a sketch plan of how they plan to develop the site and how it connects with the Horne property. There is concern of having townhouse zoning between two single - family subdivisions. 3 6 GRADING /DRAINAGE /EROSION CONTROL: The grading associated with this development is basically limited to the street right -of -way. The majority of the proposed grading for lot development is along the I -35E frontage. The development is not proposing to grade a building pad on each proposed lot, but rather, leaving the existing lot topography basically dictate what type of home ccnstruction the lot can accommodate. The developer is required to coordinate the proposed grading of Kings Wood Pointe with the Cutters Ridge Development. At the time of the preparation of this report, the Kings Wood developer and the developer of Cutters Ridge could not agree on a common elevation point to tie the two subdivisions together. This development is required to coordinate the construction of an overland drainage route with the Cutters Ridge Development in the area of Lots 13, 27 and 28, Block 1. The proposed grading plan presents a potential backyard drainage problem in this area. The majority of the site generated runoff is being conveyed to Pond JP -5. Pond JP -5 is identified in. --the City of Eagan's Comprehensive Storm Sewer Plan and designated to receive runoff from this area. A preliminary erosion and sediment control plan was not submitted for review at this time. The submitted preliminary grading and drainage plan does not meet the following general criteria for erosion control: Stabilization and revegetation, protection of adjacent property, timing and phasing of construction, sediment basin requirements, cut and fill slope stability, storm water management and outlet protection, storm sewer inlet protection, working in water bodies, utility construction, construction access routes, and disposition and maintenance. Sanitary sewer service of sufficient capacity and depth is proposed to be constructed under City Project #512R. Water main service of sufficient capacity and pressure is proposed to be provided through the Cutters Ridge Development on the south, the installation of water main under City Project #512R along the westerly proposed Kingswood Road, and tying into the existing trunk water main in Pilot Knob Road. The necessity to connect the proposed water main in Kingswood Court to the proposed Outlot A is still subject to further review by City Staff. STREETS /ACCESS /CIRCULATION: Street access to this site is proposed to be provided through the Cutters Ridge Development on the south and is readily available from Pilot Knob Road from the east. This development is proposing to take street access on the east side at the existing Kingswood Road location. (See attached letter from Dakota County.) A more desirable location as far as the City is concerned would be to extend the cul -de -sac from Coronation Road to Pilot Knob Road. This location is approximately midway between Rocky Lane and Wescott Road. This location is also more conducive to the potential development of the City Hall property. L..l� u is iequlrea co ootain the appropriate assurances from the northerly adjacent property that street access will be provided to proposed Outlots A and B. EASEMENTS /RIGHTS -OF- WAY /PERMITS: The development is proposing 50' wide street rights -of -way for all proposed internal streets. The development is required to dedicate the appropriate right -of- way for Pilot Knob Road as required by Dakota County. The development is responsible for providing appropriate easements for those public utilities constructed outside of public right -of -way. The development is responsible for acquiring all regulatory agency permits in the appropriate time frame as required by the affected agency. ASSESSMENTS: City records show the following pending assessments of record: PROJ # DESCRIPTION RATE QUANTITY AMOUNT 512 Sanitary Sewer Lateral $28.31/ff 1,460 $41,338.00 512 Storm Sewer Lateral $1,970 /ac 2.7 acres 5,319.00 TOTAL PENDING ASSESSMENTS $46,657.00 The following assessments are proposed in accordance with special assessment policies in effect at this time: PROJ # DESCRIPTION RATE QUANTITY AMOUNT 24 Water Trunk $1,315 . 1.744 $ 2,293.00 297 Storm Sewer Trunk .056 /sf 42,800 2,397.00 24 Lateral Benefit Trunk Water Main 6.55/ff 496 3,249.00 131 Lateral Benefit Trunk Water Main 26.20/1f 190 if 4,978.00 466 Pilot Knob Road 24.03/ff 646 15,523.00 372 Sanitary Sewer Lateral 31.70/1f 321 10,176.00 TOTAL PROPOSED ASSESSMENTS: All final assessment obligations will be calculated based on the quantities and dimensions of the final plat and in accordance with the rates in affect at the time of the final plat approval. 3$� $38,616.00 A. Assessments STANDARD CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL 1. This development shall accept its additional assessment obligations as defined in the staff's report in accordance with the final plat dimensions and the rates in effect at the time of final plat approval. B. Easements and Rights -of -Way 1. This development shall dedicate 10' drainage and utility easements centered over all common lot lines and adjacent to private property or public right -of -way. 2. This development shall dedicate, provide, or financially guarantee its proportionate share of the acquisition costs of additional drainage, - ponding, and utility easements as required by the alignment, depth, and storage capacity of all required public utilities and streets located beyond the boundaries of this plat or outside of dedicated public right -of -way as necessary to service this development. 3. This development shall dedicate all public right -of -way and temporary slope easements for ultimate development of adjacent roadways as required by the appropriate jurisdictional agency. 4. This development shall dedicate adequate drainage and ponding easements to incorporate the required high water elevation necessitated by City storm water storage volume requirements. C. Plans and Specifications 1. All public streets and utilities necessary to provide service to this development shall be designed by a registered professional engineer in accordance with City codes and engineering standards and policies, and approved by staff prior to final plat approval. 2. A detailed grading, drainage, erosion, and sediment control plan must be prepared in accordance with current City standards and approved by staff prior to final plat approval. 3. This development shall insure that all temporary dead end public streets shall have a cul -de -sac constructed in accordance with City engineering standards. 4. A detailed landscape plan shall be submitted on the proposed grading plan and approved by staff prior to the final plat approval. The financial guarantee shall be included in the Development Contract and not released until one year after the date of installation. 0` 35 1. These standard conditions of plat approval as adopted by Council action on September 15, 1987 shall be complied with: Al, Bl, B2, B3, B4, Cl, C2, C3, C5, D1, El, F1, and Gl. 2. The existing homes shall connect to City utilities and change their addresses. 3. Outlot C along the south side of the Exception shall be renamed Outlot D. 4. No commercial signage shall be allowed in the R -1 zoned property. 5. The townhouse density shall be determined by the City Council. 6. A Planned Development Agreement shall be entered into prior to the Final Plat approval. The Planned Development shall have a five -year period before expiration. 7. This developer is required to obtain the appropriate assusrances from the northerly adjacent property that street accress with an agreed to location will be provided to proposed Outlots "A" and "B ". 8. This developer is required to obtain the appropriate assurances from the northerly adjacent property that sanitary sewer service with sufficient depth to serve Outlots A, B, and C will be provided, or the sanitary sewer shall be constructed through this development of sufficient depth to service said Outlots A, B, and C. 9. This developer shall obtain the appropriate assurances from the County and the City for street accress for Outlot STANDARD CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL PAGE TWO 5. All internal public and private streets shall be constructed within the required right -of -way in accordance with City design standards. D. Public Improvements 1. If any public improvements are to be installed under a City contract, the appropriate project must be approved by Council action prior to final plat approval. E. Permits 1. This development shall be responsible for the acquisition of all regulatory agency permits in the time frame required by the affected agency.- F. Parks Dedication 1. This development shall fulfull its parks dedication requirements as recommended by the Advisory Parks and Recreation Commission and approved by Council action. G. Other 1. All standard platting and zoning conditions shall be adhered to unless specifically granted a variance by Council action. .Advisory Planning Commission City Council Approved: August 25, 1987 September 15, 1987 Revised: LTS #2 STANDARD #M( DE r ACM 8 COMM CEERW000 7 %) -Ths 0.11.1 %PONT • Ay C. o Ay( Lai Mut •0 E :a ' .. 4 i ■.-; ,c61: !I . 0 ij iz , 8(1•P• AM,* I 1 • ra ■-•= , 1 tsz", fy-- 1. 1.-ax - "` ° I . , j 4 j : ,.'; a -1 . 17:7 47 W1 ) 0V011:1 1 L i 21! • Lb3 • to • r" • • . �., ate_ • V=- ! ' X 11 \ 1 � � 1 • ..„,,,4. -..,_-_-,,,,--,'-''',. -'- ' - ' =- - -- .... - : - _ -,, , ,, ... 7. 7_____:..., -------- = ,: - ,____ , ---,- - . 1:47 ---1:11i- \\-4A- 2 z L r.; t; 7 5 KINGS 3 e V L■J 3 / .1 5 c). = GO..AATC. CT °,•■■A' 1.2 ....aaawc,ffiana. o 'N"F 1 1 1 ..,,, . u 1 ,,, 1 , Ilu L I 1 n -1 ‘ L , I ! a .. _------- r?: ,' , ,, , i 1 r 1 ■ ■ i 1 - - --- . 1 , . 1 i \ \ \ , 4 ........_ \ ........--1, 1,,, ..1 ---' /-'•-• 0 I / 4* ------ r 'tilt, . \ tt.a.....‘ , lit itit I 111 [ 1 \ --- L ----------/ 47 NW 1/4 r ' city of eagan r t PUBLIC LW WORKS DEPARTMENT . WATER MASTER PLAN approved: standard plate #: 64.3/84.0 56.2 /77.0 ...... 7 .1 I .0 ■ I ! r—k ',--) 96 ';----"'•-• CIT1 —.- ,...: h,LL .,„..F_-/-, _. f • . 1 . , .... \ ___. , •. ; i i i ....::: il:rf i .. • • • ... ,v:c.. Y ' .::: , 7 ,_,-,..._. 1.. - MIIIMO 16p/ . - ..1...... ,.. , - .0 10 ° ..• , .., 40 i 1 ., .., . . .- ., r4i um ei _ Istmarnewr 4 52.6/ 67.0 -- - saw •10,,le i ■ ..----- • 16" .../- 4 4.6/59.0 i .------ . ,../ \\1 d_ACKti " „ 8 I. GLACKHAWK PARK • .•/".•"••■ 51.7/ 67.0 b M.G.'. ,...... STORAGE H.W L.: )059 1 A _37 - 5 - 7 P G;ii" E I 21.8/ 31.0 80.7/92.0 16" ▪ Goo 41 88 82.804.0 I 6 „ 100.0 ; 4.4/1070 q 12" a /87.0/98.0 1 it H 4 1 714/11.4 AC II 6f.0/-65.0 ts" 3/MENVI 12" o 59.5 ct 12" - •: PARCEL 53.2 FIG 4#3 .4., ,/‘ X ' hILLs jrk\\ BP- 7 90.3 601.0 41=111 E ACKHA:,'K PARK 36* BP-3 8 8 9. 9 1 1,6 P - 35 _ 8 920.2 • BP s 874 924.0 L.? 886.5 9272 1, 12' BP -24'. • 918.00 923.2, \\;. 0 8-d 4 4, .C.1 ti3P -18 - • - 1182.q .7/ - -0 - 8626 868.0 48 a - b STORM SEWER MASTER PLAN n t . , 24 JP-5 -823.8 834.O OVD ' ' * J P -3 6 8 70.6 1 _ .._ j p,_3 ( 872.0 -,07 875.0 886.0 . ' ..,.\i ..... . ( z r,:- I „ . „ 7.874 2' .5j .- • ! i --,--.;*" 886 5' -4 . . -, • - . .. .. ---:-.!...'N 887:1 .. - - • 1 -- . . ;P -,.• - - : • T...'../ 892.0 - - -- ... . : r •- __. - . • . . ,:_:., -,,-•- • approved: FIG#I standard plate *: CUL) .V I. r. 8 • 1 9 1 7- K•21._ ' i. ....., ,•••• • ..._.._.1 1 _,-- \<■ 1 1 , F,TW ;j 4 8/8.0 8 09.7 8P-29 ;i I .11_1 - • ■ .27•!:-1i- A-s \ , 886 - _BP -33 J • i li i = 7::,:.• of A -4 ; : - - 1 I d / ;.--,z.; ,- -. ct I .. -, ...•,..... cs.4 1 / .7 .../ • ..--- - :-- ../// .....,------- I! -- OA-p // / 4: • i i . 1;., I____../ i i 42 c . --,--- p-k 1\1 // ri / ,. /., / 1 ; 11 ,/ 1;/ ,9I 0.0 II 4 ,/9/8./ ;..:.i 1 9 3 -/ jf 31. 3 / 8P-2 , S. r r." " gc'j 932.3- city of eagan PUBLIC WORKS DE PARTMEN 4 D/-\I\UI/-\ I,UUIV 1 Y City of Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55122 Att: Dale Runkle, City Planner RE: KINGS WOOD 2ND ADDITION Dear Mr. Runkle: SURVEY DEPARTMENT (612) 431 -1153 7300 WEST 147th STREET SUITE a 100 APPLE VALLEY MINNESOTA 55124 The Dakota County Plat Commission met on May 9, 1988, to reconsider the preliminary plat of KINGS WOOD 2ND ADDITION. Said plat is adjacent to C.S.A.H. NO. 31 and is, therefore, subject to the Dakota County Contiguous Plat Ordinance. After considerable discussion, the following recommendations were agreed upon: 1. Allow the realignment of Kings Wood Road near its present access with C.S.A.H. NO. 31. The location of this road does not meet the 1/4 mile spacing guidelines for street intersections. The location of Wescott Road and Cutters Lane fixes the 1/4 mile access points. The Plat Commission would have preferred the plat access at Cutters Lane., but a variance is agreed to since it is an existing road. The short distance between Kings Wood Road and Cutters Lane will limit the ability to have future turning lanes. 2. Require 60 feet of dedicated right of way from proposed Lot 3, Block 2 south to the property line and allow the existing 50 feet of right of way from said Lot 3 north to the property line provided that a 10 foot trail easement is given to Dakota County along the 50 feet of right of way. (This was allowed because of setback requirements between C.S.A.H. NO. 31 and the existing cul -de -sac.) 3. Dedication of restricted access would be required except at one opening for Kings Wood Road. This would require internal access to Outlots A and B. The County would AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY YER May 11, 1988 GARY H. STEVENSON, R.L.S. COUNTY SURVEYOR GHS:vf consider access concerns should future development of Outlot A be proposed, although existing guidelines would prohibit an additional access.. Future extension of Wescott Road to the west of C.S.A.H. NO. 31 should also be considered for access to Outlots A and B. The Ordinance requires resubmittal of the final plat before recommendation of approval is made to the County Board. No work shall commence in the County right of way until a permit is obtained from the County Highway Department. Sincerely yours, 3 g 5 4itIZ , Gary H.'Stevenson Dakota County Surveyor Plat Commission Secretary cc: McCombs Frank Roos Associates Dave Everds, County Highway Engineer Tom Swanson, Permits Technician Tom Colbert, Public Works Director Jim Horn TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL TOM HEDGES, CITY ADMINISTRATOR 10)ROM: KEN VRAA, DIRECTOR OF PARKS & RECREATION DATE: JUNE 14, 1988 SUBJECT: KINGSWOOD 2ND ADDITION At the Advisory Parks and Recreation Commission meeting of June 2nd, the Commission reviewer} the proposed Kingswood, 2nd Addi- tion. Of concern to the Commission is that this plat will determine the access to the future Community Center as a result of the County's requirement of having road intersection align and for meeting access spacing requirements. Further, the County is expected to eliminate the existing access on Pilot Knob Road, which now serv- ices the Police /Municipal Center. Staff was not able to respond to questions pertaining to how various road access alternatives might affect the Community Center; this is an issue for the architects to review and analyze for impact. Due to the fact that the architectural firm has had little opportunity to become involved in the project; it is premature to expect a response. The firm could perhaps, make a preliminary recommendation by July; however the more information covering the Community Center needs - and the needs of the Municipal Center; the better and more confident the response. Therefore, the Commission has recommended that the Community Cen- ters architectural firm review the site access issue and attempt to respond by the July Commission meeting and /or the July 19th, City Council meeting; and that an approval of the Kingswood Second Addition be deferred by the City Council until a recom- mendation is rendered by the architects as to road access. KV /bls cc: Dale Runkle, City Planner MEMORANDUM Voracek questioned if there could be a Waiver of Plat on the two outlots. Staff responded positively. Mr. Watske wants to waive the cost on the new platting. Merkley expressed concerns regarding the erosion problems. The City Planner sees no problems regarding erosion. Trygg moved, Wilkins seconded, the motion to approve the rezoning of 24.8 A (agricultural) acres to an E (estates) district. All voted in favor. Trygg moved, Wilkins seconded, the motion to approve the preliminary plat for 31 single family lots located west of Safari Pass and east of Highway 35E in the Southeast Quarter of Section 31, subject to the following conditions: 1. These standards conditions of Plat Approval as adopted by Council action on September 15, 1987, shall be complied with: Al, B1, B2, B3, B4, 01, C2, C3, C5, D1, El, Fi, and G1. _ -- -• 2. Lots 5, 6, 21, 22 and 23, Block 1 and Lot 9, Block 2, shall be modified to meet Estate minimum width requirements at the 30 foot setback line. 3. The outlots within the Safari 3rd Addition shall be final platted separately as the Safari 4th Addition or this plat including them shall be renamed Safari 4th Addition. 4. The development is required to provide emergency overland drainage routes for the low point in the proposed roadway to Pond AP -17 and for the landlocked low area in the area Lot 4, Block 2. 5. The development is required to provide at least 2 feet of elevation freeboard for proposed walk out levels and the highest elevation of the emergency overland drainage routes. 6. An access easement for maintenance personnel is required for public - utility lines not contained within public right -of -way. KINGS WOOD 2ND ADDITION - JAMFS HORNE Chairman Pawlenty then convened the public hearing in regard to the application for a comprehensive guide plan amendment and rezoning of 52.8 agricultural acres to a mixed use planned development district consisting of 41.5 R -1 (single family) acres and two outlots for future development with General Business and R -3 (townhouse) designations located between Pilot Knob Road and Highway 35E north of Deerwood Drive in the Northeast (.darter of Section 21. Applicant Jim Horne presented the proposal to the Commission and asked for approval of the Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment, a Rezoning and a Preliminary Plat. -2- Chairman Pawlenty stated he has concerns with the General Business designation and also with the access off of Pilot Knob Road. Graves stated he has concerns with the General Business use designation being situated between two single - family subdivisions. Miller expressed reservations with the General Business designation and questioned what would happen if Mr. Horne died. He stated that someone could then come in with a two -story bowling alley if the General Business designation was approved. Voracek stated he has concerns regarding Outlot C and suggested possible compromises, for example, a stipulation inserted regarding limited use. Mr. Voracek also proposed a condition regarding the townhomes and stated that if property to the north becomes single- family dwelling, these proposed townhomes would then become single - family dwellings also. Wilkins suggested continuing the item to the June 21st, 1988 Planning Commission} meeting. Chairman Pawlenty asked for Mr. Horne's response regarding the continuance. Mr. Horne stated he would be very reluctant to change his plan. Graves moved, Wilkins seconded, the motion to deny the application for the Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment, a Rezoning and a Preliminary Plat of 52.8 agricultural acres to a mixed used Planned Development District consisting of 41.5 single- family acres and two outlots for future development with General Business and Townhouse designations located between Pilot Knob Road and Highway 35E north of Deerwood Drive in the Northeast Quarter of Section 21. All voted in favor. SOLDERHOLM ADDITION - EAGLE ENTERPRISES The next public hearing of the evening convened by Chairman Pawlenty was in regard to the application of a Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment (Rezoning) of 4.52 R-4 (multiple) acres within the Lexington South Planned Development to a LB (limited business) district and a Preliminary Plat containing three lots located at the Northwest intersection of Lexington Avenue and Diffley Road in the Southwest Quarter of Section 23. Denny Griswold, landscape architect, presented the proposed development to the Commission. He stated that City staff has been working with him the past several months regarding the possible land use change as well as with the County regarding the potential access points on to Lexington Avenue and Diffley Road. Before any final site related issues can be resolved, the issue of the zoning change must be addressed. -3-- June 13, 1988 City of Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55121 Dear Tom, Maurer 1631 East 79th Street, Suite 149 Bloomington, MN 55420 854 -5001 Attention: Thomas L. Hedges As you know we have been working with Jim Horne on the Development of his property on Pilot Knob Road. Also, as you are probably aware the Planning Commission has rejected his proposed plat at this time. It is our concern that in order for both the Planning Commission and the C:Lty Council to fully understand why Jims request includes the Townhouse and Commercial areas, they must see and walk the site. It is our opinion that in order to make the best use of Mr. Hornes property and to preserve? the existing trees and topography to its fullest extent, the use of these types of construction are necessary. We are dealing with severe areas which would have to be changed to accomodate single family type construction. It is our request that we might have the opportunity to meet with those members of the Planning Commission, City Council and City Staff who might take the time and allow us to show them first hand on site what we are dealing with. Therefore, we ask you to advise us of the proper way to make contact and set up such a meeting. I can be reached at 432 -1646. Tom, I would also like to take this opportunity to let you know how impressed I have been with the City Staff and the Planning Commission. Their cooperative and helpful spirit is a great asset to your fine community. "Quality is the Difference" We look forward to working with the City of Eagan to develope a very fine neighborhood/ one which will make us all proud. Thank you Very Truly Yours GEORGE C. MAURER CONSTRUCTION, INC. t Terrance G. Maurer President TGM;pp Agenda Information Memo July 19, 1988, City Council Meeting B. Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment, Solderholm Addition, Planned Development Amendment of 4.52 R -4 Acres Within the Lexington South Planned Development to an LB District and a Preliminary Plat Containing Three (3) Lots Located at the Northwest Intersection of Lexington Avenue and Diffley Road - -At the June 21, 1988 City Council meeting, the Solderholm Addition /Eagle Enterprises for Comprehensive Guide Plan amendment, rezoning and preliminary plat were given consideration. The APC held al public hearing at their meeting of May 26 and is recommending approval of the applications to the C:Lty Council. C:Lty Councilmembers discussed both the access problem to the property due to the county road intersection of Lexington and Diffley and further that the proposed land use is inconsistent with the Comprehensive Guide Plan. After a lengthy discussion and consideration by the City Council the applications as defined were continued to the July 19, 1988 C:Lty Council meeting. The Planning memo, copies For a copy /22--through SOLDERHOLM ADDITION Department has addressed the concerns and prepared a enclosed on pages) {n� through 0/ for your review. o the June 21 City Council minutes, refer to pages ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny 1) a Comprehensive Guide Plan amendment, 2) a Planned Development arlendment for the rezoning of 4.52 R -4 acres to an LB (Limited Business) District, and 3) a preliminary plat containing three (3) lots. 6/s MEMO TO: DALE RUNKLE, CITY PLANNER TOM HEDGES, CITY ADMINISTRATOR FROM: JIM STURM, PLANNER 1 DATE: JULY 14, 1988 RE: SODERHOLM ADDITION This item was continued at the June 21 City Council meeting and the developer was asked to prepare a plan that demonstrated how the Outlot area (the area that currently contains the Soderholm house) could be developed in the future as well as the parcel to the north. Office use is the intent for the Outlot and Parcel 1, however the parcel is not being included in the plat. As proposed, all parking and building setback requirements would meet Code requirements. An overall landscape plan that ties all of the lots together will be available for your review at the City Council meeting on July 19. The applicant is aware of the recently adopted building exterior Ordinance requirements. Glass and brick is proposed for all buildings. Attached is an updated exhibit with the proposed office building layout. c7 74611/4;4441/4—'- Planner 1✓ JS /js COVENANT CHURCH OF EAGAN ;L-- = L == ' I, y Ib I si 1 r r* - _ _ l I t e r F I I S O II I r !" - - +_— .. 1 m..•a►r• 11 __1__ ir}. .thri l r �7rrni - - -� L__ � i l I tM�1b m OFF1C (.4 131 /411•S Cuac tor It 11141 �aV - I'.I F,r 19Y..O1. assemwr C7 2 0 N KENSINGTON PLACE / r 1st. ADDMON (� r ° r N N 6 co t0 t4 rrr rrr err • nags .•.. n as■ O O $$ O - w §t b r> ^ w i O O• . mi .r.;44 " 10 • nl ± nl f N f b iall an /• 0 or ✓'.* yaw 0 W w O 4 0 4 0 W CC 0 (] C Y P O W N b N b O n b N a. 2 2 U LEXINGTON HILLS 1st. ADDITION z —J a w t ✓s. .�' l M l as yaV r - •••• ara. SNP • -• I.r Wisps. r'wr EPISCOPAL CHURCH EAGAN CENTER 1st ADDITION Mr. Egan asked Mr. ttAey would be able to review the final design before the taia1:::pla M:r:. Colbert stated that after preliminary plat approval., the City is locked in on the configuration. Mayor Ellison stated he felt it unfair to slow down the developer. Egan moved, Wachter.._.seconded, the motion to approve the comprehensive guide planmendznent from D -II to D -I. All voted affirmatively. Egan moved, McCrea seconded, the motion to approve the rezoning of 41.5 R -1 single family.: : A1J:: :: :: voted in favor. Mr. Colbert stated the Council in the past has always been sensitive to other developers' concerns. The Council is not in this situation sensitive to the City when they are developing. Mr. Hedges stated the access point to the community center will be very important. McCrea asked the developer:to hold off on construction for two weeks. The developer stated . e:::w:o:uld prefer to begin construction as soon as possible. Egan moved, Wachter seco.ndedis the motion to continue the applicaton for the prelimilary:plat.,entitled Kings Woods 2nd Addition until the July 5, 1988 Council meeting :. All voted yes. SOLDERHOME ADDITION /EAGLE ENTERPRISES /COMP GUIDE PLAN AMENDMENT /REZONING /PRELIMINARY PLAT Tom Hedges stated a public hearing was held by the Advisory Planning Commission at their. : . : last regular meeting held on May 26, 1988, to consider an appl :tted by Eagle Enterprises for a comprehensive guide plan;:::aiiendmext, planned development amendment of 4.52 R -4 acres within th :Lexingt'on South planned development to an LB district and a preliminary plat consisting of three lots. The APC is recommending approval:Nr....B nkle..stated the site is located at the northwest intersectio :4Df.leRoad and Lexington Avenue. He feels there is an access problem b of the two county roads. He suggested the biggest problem to the Council is the land use. Mr. Griswold, land architect, stated he has worked hard with the staff regarding the access t:o li:property. He further stated they will work with the County :; re�i aiilin t. a access problem and feels the problem can be resolved.tated YW4eels the corner of Lexington and Diffley lends itself :well to thel:imited business use proposal. He feels the size of theproperty is t;po small for multiple family sites and feels the limited busi.ness...:s more in character with the area. The developer has de aa rq:pa:sals with the clinic and the day care facilities and i' stutdetails with the bank. -32- t07- Mr. Egan asked if the_matteK.Wa§only now dealing with parcels two and three and the (3 Solderhome homestead. Mr. Griswold stated that waS'66erett:t asked what is the current zoning of parcene. Mr. Griswold stated it is R-4 planned development. Mr. HedgesOated the guide plan is D-1. Mr. Gustafson stated he is concerned about the future of parcel one and does not want "piece meal" work. Fred Swenson, Tri-Land representative, stated Tri-Land opposes the development as they ill be.. submitting plans next month to the Council for their futuredevelOPment. He is concerned where the access off Diffley will be located. Mr. Swenson stated they are selling to their users good acCess and good traffic patterns. Mr. Colbert stated A1e:4etiecupeen received from the County surveyor with concerns regarding the spacing guidelines. The County spacing guidelines call for one-quarter mile spacing of access points. This proposed development does not meet the spacing guidelines. The distance along CSAH 30 between the center lines ot existing Lexington Way and County Road is less than 800 teet. This distance is less than the standar required to develop two left-turn lanes in the fututehOrefore, any access to CSAH 30 would greatly limit the abilityleVel.4 future left-turn lanes on County Road 43 and Lexington WaThe pr4osed site plan as submitted is not acceptable to the County.. Mr. Griswold stated they wili to the County regarding tneir concerns and the one-quarter mile spacing of access points. Mayor Ellison informed Mr. Griswold the County will not give access on Diffley. He stated this puts a "hole in your plan". The developer stated they have worked with the City staff and the two churches in the a;.Wtp. wor 1 the access problems with the County. Representatives ttom stated they will be working with Solderhome and thatghey 1 the limited business district. Brad Swenson statec0 feS he has questions on the existing uses and the traffic pro0.1*1.4Wta.Pre turn lane, and the access point to parcel one. The applicant stated he has legal access already to Diffley. Councilmember Wachter stated„ feels the matter should be continued for further study the Council should look at all of the parcels anctintle in their decision. Wachter moved, Egan seconded, to:Continue the request for the comprehensive guide plan amendment, planned development amendment, and the preliminary platheS01:40411ome Addition/Eagle Enterprises to the July 1-5 meeting. Al). voted in favor. -33- 63 Agenda Information Memo July 19, 1988, City Council Meeting WINE AND BEER LICENSE FOR EAGAN TAP C. License for Wine and Beer for New Owner of Eagan Tap at 3998 Sibley Memorial Highway - -At the July 5, 1988 City Council meeting a license for wine and beer for Julio de la Huerta of Eagan Grill, Inc. was continued to the July 19 meeting. The purpose for the continuance was a non - response by Mr. Huerta to the Police Department's calls to proceed with an investigation. Since the July 5 meeting the police have made contact with Mr. Huerta and completed their investigation and find no reason to recommend denial of this license. Mr. Huerta is purchasing the Eagan Tap at 3998 Sibley Memorial Highway and the business name will remain the same under his ownership. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny a wine and strong beer license for the new owner of the Eagan Tap, Mr. Julio de la Huerta. Agenda Information Memo July 19, 1988, City Council Meeting NEW BUSINESS SITE PLAN REVIEW /LONE OAK ADDITION A. Site Plan Review for Landscape and Signage for Lone Oak Addition - -The Planning Department has received the site plan proposal for the Lone Oak Addition which is being marketed as The Waters development. This development is located east of Trunk Highway 149, west of Cray Research, and south of Northwest Airlines. According to our Planning Department, the signage, landscaping and lighting plan is the most sophisticated and complete landscaping proposal reviewed by that department for any development. Enclosed for Council review is a memo ;rom the Planning Department, referenced as page(s) (, through 7. Also enclosed is a copy of the signage, landscape, lighting proposal for The Waters development for your review and consideration. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the landscape and signage site plan review for the Lone Oak Addition. MEMO TO: DALE RUNKLE, CITY PLANNER TOM HEDGES, CITY ADMINISTRATOR FROM: JIM STURM, PLANNER 1 /LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT DATE: JULY 14, 1988 RE: SITE PLAN REVIEW - LONE OAK ADDITION Over the past eight to nine months, staff has been working with the ]Laukka Development Company in an effort to develop a Comprehensive Signage and Landscape Plan for the western portion of the Lone Oak Addition. It has been a real pleasure dealing with Rick Burger of the Laukka Company, the landscape architects from Arteka and the architect in charge of the signage, Jack Buxell. The signage plan is consistent all the way from the street signage to the rear service doors. A unique proposal is the free standing granite kiosk that pulls the driver off Lone Oak Parkway into a small rest stop type area. The goal is to establish a theme for the signage and landscaping that would ultimately continue into the Northwest Airlines and Cray Research areas. R:Lck Burger would like to do a short presentation before the Council and answer any questions they may have. An oversized set of plans has been provided for each Council member. The City will need to prepare separate agreements with the Laukka Development Co that: 1. place the responsibility for the maintenance of the landscaping in the R.O.W. fully on the developer. 2. states that any replacement 'ornamental' street signs will be at the developer's expense. Finally, staff asked the developer to submit a letter or document from a consulting traffic engineer that confirmed that the proposed signage would not distract drivers. All signage does meet the guidelines of the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD). A letter from BRW confirming this is attached for your review. Planner 1 / L4ndscape Architect JS/]s Attach. �6 BENNETT RINGROSE NOLSFELD JARVIS GARDNER INC • THRESHER SQUARE • 700 THIRD STREET SOUTH • MINNEAPOLIS MN 55415 PHONE 612 370 -0700 DATE: July 8, 1988 TO: City of Eagan FROM: Anthony Heppelmann, P.E. - Associate RE: The Waters, Eagan, Minnesota Street /Traffic Safety Signage PLANNING TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING ARCHITECTURE MEMORANDUM For consistent and safe operation the driver must receive appropriate regula- tory, warning, and guidance information in a uniform manner as he maneuvers his vehicle over the roadway system in varying conditions of traffic, terrain and weather. The establishment of appropriate messages, sign design and uniformity of application is formalized in the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD). It is proposed that, in the Waters Project, all signs in the public right -of -way conform with the MUTCD relative to design and location. A unique signpost and mounting is proposed to fit with the image of the project. The signpost and mounting will be designed to maximize the visibility and contrast of the sign and hold the sign in a proper and permanent position, to resist swaying in the wind or displacement by vandalism. The sign supports will be of a suitable breakaway or yielding design. The shape, color, dimensions, legends, borders, and illumination or reflec- torization of all signs in the public right -of -way will be in conformance with the MUTCD. In addition, the position, height, and lateral clearance to all signs in the public right -of -way will be in conformance with the MUTCD to ensure uniformity in location, high visibility, and driver safety. AH /sml MINNEAPOLIS DENVER PHOENIX Agenda Information Memo July 19, 1988, City Council Meeting VARIANCE /SKUNBERG B. Variance at 4739 Ridgewind Trail /Brian Skunberg, for a 4' Variance to the Rear Yard Setback at Lot 4, Block 3, Park Ridge 2nd Addition - -A variance application was processed by the Planning Department for Brian Skunberg for property located at 4739 Ridgewind Trail. Mr. Skunberg is requesting a 6' variance to the required 15' rear yard setback for the purpose of completing an accessory building. For a copy of the Planning Department report, review pages ( through 71 . Mr. Skunberg was unaware of his necessity to apply for a building permit from the City and, once informed by a City inspector, was most willing to pay the fee and process the application. Once the building permit application was processed and reviewed, it was determined that a variance would be required from the rear yard setback and again Mr. Skunberg was most cooperative in applying for the variance and proceeding through the departmental review. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny a 4' variance to the rear yard setback for Lot 4, Block 3, Park Ridge 2nd Addition. CITY OF EAGAN SUBJECT: VARIANCE APPLICANT: BRIAN SKUNBERG LOCATION: 4739 RIDGE WIND TRAIL EXISTING ZONING: PD R -1 PLANNED DEVELOPMENT SINGLE FAMILY DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: JULY 19, 1988 DATE OF REPORT: JULY 8, 1988 REPORTED BY: PLANNING DEPARTMENT APPLICATION SUMMARY: The applicant, Brian Skunberg, has requested a 6' variance to the required 15' rear yard setback for the pur- pose of completing an accessory building. The slab and apron were poured last fall and the framing was done June 25, 1988. The concrete slab extends to within 3.5 - 4.0 feet from the property line and the accessory building and dog house rest on the slab. The shed meets or exceeds all other setback requirements and if approved shall meet the following condition: 1. A building permit application shall be completed and ap- propriate fee be paid to the City prior to further construction of the accessory building. 69 icioitucic ENGINEERING COMPANY, INC. ��. 1000 CAST I-4 6 A STREET, Eder-I t ccac t9u.reiv'ie y zaszELL r Leo >✓o rz . LOT 4 BLOCK 3, P/9RA R /DG e 2 ND 49DD /T /ON ..a9 ROTA C !/NTy / /NNESOTA, WORT SCALE. / "= 30' / . i -- 1_L� / . 3 a' fRO /vP av/c o/,yc SET.ACX ' /NE DRA /NAE bT/L /TY EASMNT 0 A1 1 47; LOT 1 22 0 9 � CONSULTING (NO)HEIAS PLANNERS and LAND SURVIYO AS EURNSVILLE , MINNESOTA 55337 . PH 432.3000 P"'" DENOTES EX /ST /NG EL E4,9T /O4' DENOTES PROPOSED EL t7AT /ON /ND /CATES' D /BEET /ON aF SURFACE DRA //Y.9GE F/N /SHED GARAGE AL DO.? EL El/AT /ON = eM9 hertby certify that this is a true and correct representation of a tract of .and as shorn' and described hereon. As prepared by me on this 22-.JD day of , 1,84- Minn. !.r. We. /Gads /$ = j o - J, g/o c k _3, Pct i4 eid e _ - -- ,D . oiLa C own ,L, _/ inrteso /a Agenda Information Memo July 19, 1988, City Council Meeting WAIVER OF PLAT /WILLIAM HUTTNER C. Waiver of Plat for William Huttner to Allow a Conveyance of Land - -A public hearing was held by the Advisory Planning Commission at their last regular meeting held on June 28, 1988, to consider a Waiver of Plat application to allow a conveyance of land sale located northwest of the Sunrise Hills and Woodland Additions and south of the Wescott Garden Lots in Section 14. The APC is recommending approval of the Waiver of Plat. For additional information on this item, refer to the Planning and Engi ering Department report, copies enclosed on pages 73 through 0 / Our copy of the Advisory Planning Commission minutes refer to page(s) 57/ through ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny a Waiver of Plat for William Huttner for the conveyance of a land sale located northwest of the Sunrise Hills and Woodland Additions and south of the Wescott Garden Lots in Section 14. APPLICATION SUMMARY CITY OF EAGAN SUBJECT: WAIVER OF PLAT APPLICANT: WILLIAM HUTTNER LOCATION: SW 1/4 OF SECTION 14 EXISTING ZONING: AG (AGRICULTURAL) DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: JUNE 28, 1988 DATE OF REPORT: JUNE 20, 1988 REPORTED BY: PLANNING AND ENGINEERING DEPARTMENTS An application has been submitted requesting a Waiver of Plat to allow a conveyance of a land sale located northwest of the Sunrise Hills and Woodland Additions and south of the Wescott Garden Lots in section 14. No development will occur as a direct result of the Waiver of Plat; however, the applicant has submitted plans requesting a Preliminary Plat for a portion of the site. These plans have been modified slightly through the design process and they will be scheduled for review by the Advisory Planning Commission at the July meeting along with an adjacent parcel (Woodlands 2nd Addition). The existing home near the northwest portion of the site has access onto Wescott Hills Drive. Included in the packet is a sketch plan of the potential future development of the site. Detailed plans with possible refinement are currently being worked out between staff and the developer. If approved, all applicable Code Ordinances shall be adhered to. 73 ENGINEERING COMMENTS There presently are no public utilities or improved streets constructed to serve this area. City records show an existing 40' half right -of -way for Birch Street along the northerly boundary of the proposed Waiver of Plat property. Improved street access has been provided through the recently platted southerly adjacent Sunrise Hills Addition. The parcel has been previously levied trunk area assessment for sanitary sewer only. The following trunk area assessments for storm sewer and water main are identified in accordance with present City Special Assessment policies and proposed as a condition of the Waiver: Parcel A: DESCRIPTION RATE QTY AMT Water Trunk $1,250 /ac 4.3566 (.8) $4,357 Storm Sewer Trunk .056 /sf 189,773 (.8) 8,502 TOTAL PROPOSED ASSESSMENT PARCEL A $12,858 Parcel B: DESCRIPTION RATE QTY AMT Water Trunk $1,250 /ac 10.6434 (.8) $10,643 Storm Sewer Trunk .056 /sf 463,626 (.8) 20,770 TOTAL PROPOSED ASSESSMENT PARCEL B $31,414 TOTAL PROPOSED ASSESSMENTS PARCEL A & PARCEL B $44,272 � L-41--112 Lk J 4- 1 , IGT b`I 7� \ I '.I' CARRIAGE" I MILLS G,.'LFI COURSE ( j I \� 11 WI) ' l £SCOTT 5(U„.„ niLL9 '/OPI��t �—r�nciP!'E -2 et- / \-----/ 7- '----- \ i f ... i ,:. • y:; 22" - Z ,6 \t 4 5 3 4 0 , r • z 3 ; * / ti ag• .44 te5 4.4 • .< 4,- ---.. - • , 4,... .„-a• 4 ..k. . : ,.:e,,, A '0. . 1. , ,,-,•--:>' , ' V --, . F- -:;,. Jt. /..., a ..,,•:' - 411111tzeitarija , e r...;" .., , , 7,-.•• • 7. co.l.01 ri‘ ''''.(Z.::;:% ,..., :. '1"......1 4111021.6. ..,__-, „? ,o • '," i.,..t-c- .., 00+-01 ,.... ; .. .r ? Y.' • , • ,ty ,:e: . ----:„ • ' ,„__ 4. ,.... i .. _ / • i CC . - .i •---....-....... ... ,......,;:',. 1 --- . 4 - ,...-s .,' ---,-,,, 1,v...,-. fi . f- . / - ,. . ....,,---....-- .. ...._...— „ ---_, ,i:., . i 4 *): - ' 4/ ''s \ ' \\' -* f . --” it- ''' .. . ,,c0 , \ , __- .....- .... .„--- ' \ - '" -it fe- », •••—'1.1". '-'r ' N -..e.ns . .,...... 14.- ' - --......,----.7.-4,:41., ...",'....,•;;. \ ?..",\ , .. ''''...ar, <.S.....____:„ \••• ....• : \ , ••.„. ..4 .....' . :::7'r..1. \ ,. 5 7 ,- -1 ' .H--,--,....,.. , • ...v.", - . ••;,4 - I " i / -- - .4: .. \ „......_- — ..., i x -..q!"--•-•;;--------... • ,,,_ ...„,-Yrofd'i .. ii •,g' ` ti \ • ; ----,--"c .-- i --fz..... .i.c,' / 4, ;-;--- 4-- 4-•-•..... -.. , 77 ( >-Z- 2 fNe rl city of eagan PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMEN WATER MASTER PLAN standard approved: plate #: 7 53 6/72.0 _ 4 8" •?, COURSE 1 OEM IMP alle (MI GINN WM 411•11 41i OM SNIP °IMP 'a M I , 'AIRUPP,:: 1.11.1 i i':•:•:•:: :.:•!.....:,:,:•:,....:•:..! 3 .__ ......_„, /.. _ ,..„ _,--,-,,,,_-_•: _____,,,,, -.-. ,,- 1 , _„-_-: ./ ..._ 50 3/67.0 ., . -.. -....". 118" ' . / —, V FE' P..;!..D/ C. N- 12" ----- . *Nalmisrlem ims■ MIMI =Mb =IIIIM _1•1111■ - 11•1•011 UMW 1.11111 - 1•1•11 1.11. — 1=1/1 ei■ I ..;-'. 1 3 118" 1 est /71.0 16" • 54.6 53.1 / 68.0 - 503/67.0 - MD 6011%. 3-- — 411 •110 — — IMO allIs OEM MN= 433/600 50.4/67.0 51.4 / 65.0 61 6 80.0- 6" 23 )— • 16" N • 1 LCTS 11 6" somm emus 116" 4 17 / 32 0 IO G GROUND STORAGE W L. 1059 58 2 /:76-0 38.4/ FIG43 P-6 57 .3 66 5 893.0 895.5 • JP-II 815.7 830.0 city of eagan Erzi PUBLIC -CsV WORKS DEPARTMEN • DP- I I 856 0 6 6 4.4 . - 11111,- JP-46 892.3 8.9 3.5 12 9 t 17 66" Cs! 48" 881.2 887.0 JP 885.3- 887.0 i JP-63 . - - 9 00.7.: -_- yr.'-i ' 885.7 899 7 . J P JP 1 - 888.1. ' 12 876.3 - ---- i P =4 4 ---- z .. 1 ' - 890.7 c•A:--- 880.4 , 0) 21" - 4 1 895.7 Irs -J -11P •-•= JP 877.5 8822 JP-30 - .*??•/- - 8 7 3 .0 r? 7 0 4 STORM SEWER MASTER PLAN E- b L.S.-15 - 4 , 4, J-r 829.0 8 5 6.0 DP-5 1 E 3 6 E-c • . ■,---.. \ 855.4 ' / 1 877 / • 838.3' s .... -; 1, 7 .: . L .S.-7 f • " - - --, 1 IDs 1'.- ..„- , - E-e 42" - E - d 0 - p el • DP-10 , 848.0 ; DP - E- 27 ' E. 1 )P ' 0 - r 6 600 . i - , 858.3 . w t c ;F)__I FiLL,,-; / :1 - N / )01.0 s, o‘ 1----1 862.8 - - DP - 7 • ' L E r,-',F. - - - -------::::-._ : : 882.2! , ,I=: ,- . \* c7 1 ; WES:01 T 1 1 . ' ? ' / 1 . / D - 7 - , (.."..P.RIL,GE 1 , ■ 11: L L 5 E ' 12 G C: I., F 7 • i .:.-..-,-.7,s ' , , JP 14 ;',+ D1:- c ' 1 • /-----• -- 873.0 . 8 54.0 -- _,, ,n,op 25 ____ L t : ,.. i ., - 7 - , rc , • 682.0 , • I jP233 - 8 92 .0 ....... ...... ........... „ j.1.1" J an"...... ' ‘ 854.0 cz , 832.0 886.4 --- P:=6 _ 888 7 ft..., • - 89,40 7 11 2 \2- 864.0 1•.-, 90/5 JP 12 8973 887.1 8 79 .7 6881 I 826.0 8 53.0. JP 884.0- - 895.0 JP 874.0 882.0 • / SUBJECT PARCEL approved: FIG I standard plate #: Page 8 /PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES June 28, 1988 Chairman Pawlenty stated he feels the Council should consider the proposed development standards when they review the Alden Ponds project. He asked the developer to review these new standards when they are approved and attempt to conform to them wherever possible. Mr. Graves asked if the new development standards ordinance passes the Council, will developments previously approved be grandfathered in. Mr. Sheldon stated the ordinance is not effective until approved by the Council. If a development had received preliminary plat approval, it would not necessarily have to comply with the new ordinance. However, it would be asked to comply with it. If a development had not received preliminary plat approval, any new development would need to conform to the new ordinance. All voted in favor. Mr. Voracek requested the Council review the possibility of signals at the two intersections before an accident occurs at the intersections. Chairman Pawlenty thanked all parties involved with the development for their efforts in working out the problems. WILLIAM BUTTNER — WAIVER OF PLAT Chairman Pawlenty then convened the public hearing in regard to the request for a waiver of plat to allow a conveyance of land located in the southwest quarter of Section 14, south of Birch Street. Mr. Sturm informed the Commission an application had been submitted requesting a waiver of plat to allow a conveyance of a land sale located northwest of the Sunrise Hills and Woodland Additions and south of the Wescott Garden Lots in Section 14. He stated no development will occur as a direct result of the waiver of plat. The applicant has submitted plans requesting a preliminary plat for a portion of the site. These plans have been modified slightly through the design process and will be reviewed by the APC at the July meeting together with the adjacent parcel known as Woodlands Second Addition. The existing home near the northwest portion of the site has access onto Wescott Hills Drive. Mr. Sturm noted that detailed plans are currently being worked out between the staff and the developer. The applicant was not present at the meeting. Mr. Widstrom, abutting property owner, had concerns regarding Birch Street. He stated junk had been left on his land which endangers his cattle. He further stated he does not want more 81 Page 9 /PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES June 28, 1988 improvements assessed to his land. Mr. Foertsch stated the City has a right -of -way for Birch Street. Chairman Pawlenty informed Mr. Widstrom that the Commission was currently considering the waiver of plat only. He stated no construction would begin at this time and the preliminary plat request for the development would be discusses at the next month's AFC meeting. He suggested Mr. Widstrom contact the developer before the next APC meeting to discuss his concerns. Mrs. Widstrom stated the surveyors cut their fences and their cattle were loose. Mr. Sturm stated the sketch submitted at the meeting was only a concept proposal from the developer and the preliminary plat would not be approved at the meeting. He stated all property owners would be notified of the next public hearing. He further statea he will get in touch with Mr. Widstrom before the next APC meeting ana set up a meeting with the developer to discuss Mr. Widstrom's concerns. Mr. Devlin, 3555 Trails End, asked who would be assessed for the improvements of Birch Road. Mr. Foertsch stated the benefitea property owners would be assessed tor the improvements ana there was no estimate of the cost at this time. Mr. Sheldon stated a feasibility report would be completed with the figures of the assessments before Council approves the plan. Mr. Sturm informed Mr. Devlin City staff will attempt to give him an estimate of the possible assessments if he calls the City. Member Wilkins stated there was a waiver of plat granted last month at the APC meeting and for which property. Mr. Sturm stated Mr. Devlin sold five acres to Mr. Widstrom. Member Wilkins stated she felt the applicant should have attended the public hearing. She suggested denying the request. Mr. Voracek stated 'there was not a policy that applicants had to appear at the public hearings. Trygg moved, Graves seconded, the motion to approve the waiver of plat to allow a conveyance of land located in the southwest quarter of Section 14, south of Birch Street. All voted affirmatively. VANMAN CONSTRUCTION COMPANY - ALL SAINTS LUTHERAN CHURCH ADDITION Chairman Pawlenty opened the next public hearing regarding the application for a comprehensive guide plan amendment, planned development amendment (rezoning) , and preliminary plat of approximately 4 acres zoned R -1 within the Lexington South Plannea Development to a PF (public facilities) district within the planned Agenda Information Memo July 19, 1988, City Council Meeting COMPREHENSIVE GUIDE PLAN AMENDMENT /PD /PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR ALL SAINTS LUTHERAN CHURCH ADDITION D. Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment, Planned Development Amendment for All Saints Lutheran Church Addition and Preliminary Plat of Approximately Four Acres Zoned R -1 Within the Lexington South Planned Development to a PF (Public Facilities) District - -A public hearing was held before the Advisory Planning Commission at their last regular meeting held on June 28, 1988 to consider separate applications requesting a rezoning of 3.85 acres within the Lexington South planned development from an R -1 to a PF district and a preliminary plat for the All Saints Lutheran Church Addition. Also a Comprehensive Guide Plan amendment is necessary changing the property from its present designation of D -II. The APC is recommending approval of the applications. For a copy of th Planning and Engineering Department report, refer to pages , through . For a copy of the APC minutes on this action, refer to page(s) /66 through /(S3. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny 1) Comprehensive Guide Plan amendment, 2) Planned Development amendment rezoning, and 3) a preliminary plat of approximately four (4) acres entitled All Saints Lutheran Church. The rezoning is an R -1 to PF (Public Facilities). q's APPLICATION SUMMARY CITY OF EAGAN SUBJECT: COMPREHENSIVE GUIDE PLAN AMENDMENT PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AMENDMENT PRELIMINARY PLAT (ALL SAINTS LUTHERAN CHURCH ADDITION) APPLICANT: VANMAN CONSTRUCTION COMPANY LOCATION: NW 1/4 OF SECTION 23 EXISTING ZONING: R -1 (WITHIN THE LEXINGTON SOUTH PD) DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: JUNE 28, 1988 DATE OF REPORT: JUNE 20, 1988 REPORTED BY: PLANNING AND ENGINEERING Separate applications have been submitted requesting a Rezoning o:= 3.85 (R -1 single - family) acres within the Lexington South Planned Development to a PF (public facilities) district and a Preliminary Plat for the All Saints Lutheran Church Addition. This site is located at the southeast intersection of Lexington Avenue and Wescott Road. The City's most recent Land Use Plan designates this area D -II; therefore, an Amendment will be necessary. EXISTING CONDITIONS /SITE PLAN Currently this site is open, flat grassland void of any significant vegetation. Existing homes within the Lexington Square Addition abut this site on the south and on the east. One access point onto Wescott Road will serve the 160 -seat church building. Ample expansion area is available to the east as well as parking lot area to the south. Code requires one parking stall per each 3 -1/2 seats based upon capacity. Forty -five 10' -wide stalls are required and seventy -nine will be provided with the first phase of construction. All Code building and parking setbacks have been adhered to. The scale of the building relates nicely to the adjacent single- family homes. It has a one -story brick exterior with clean, gabled roof lines. The proposed landscape plan addresses the City's main concern of screening the parking lot area from Wescott Road and the residential area. The 6' -tall Colorado blue spruce will be planted with the first phase of construction. Staff recommends adding overstory deciduous material throughout the site, especially along Wescott Road where no trees are proposed. A 6'- tall berm will be constructed along the southern property line and seeded immediately. The parking lot expansion area will end at that point. �4 GRADING /DRAINAGE /EROSION CONTROL: The proposed site was previously rough graded and does not require excessive grading to accomplish the proposed first floor building elevation of approximately 898.25. The proposed 898.25 elevation is approximately 2 feet below the future Lexington Avenue grade immediately west of the building and approximately 3 -1/2 feet lower than the existing grades for Wescott Road immediately north of the proposed building. The proposed grading plan around the church building itself has the potential for the building trapping water along its north side. The grading plan should be revised to reflect drainage swales which will carry the water away from the building. This drainage can be directed to the parking lot area where the Development is proposing to intercept the site generated runoff in an internal storm sewer system and convey this runoff to the proposed City storm sewer system. The proposed City storm sewer system is presently being constructed under Project #527. An additional catch basin is required in the southwest corner of the parking lot. An erosion and sediment control plan was not submitted as a part of this application. The Development is required to an erosion and sediment control plan for review and approval by staff prior to issuance of a grading permit or final plat approval. UTILITIES: Sanitary sewer service of sufficient capacity and depth to serve this site is readily available from the existing sanitary sewer along the common lot line between Lots 5 and 6, Block 1 of Lexington Square, 1st Addition. The Development will be required to construct a manhole at the northerly terminus of this sanitary sewer service stub. Watermain service of sufficient capacity and pressure to serve this Development is readily available from the existing watermain located along the northerly side of Wescott Road. A 6" water service has been provided to the southerly right -of -way line of Wescott Road. STREETS /ACCESS /CIRCULATION: The Development is proposing to take street access from northerly adjacent Wescott Road in one location which is approximately 40' south of its northerly property line. No access to Lexington Avenue (County Road 43) is proposed. The Dakota County Plat Commission will be requiring dedication of restricted access along the westerly adjacent Lexington Avenue. EASEMENTS /RIGHTS -OF- WAY /PERMITS: The proposed 60' half right -of- way for Lexington Avenue is in accordance with current Dakota County right -of -way requirements. The Development is proposing to dedicate a 50' half right -of -way for Wescott Road. This 50' half right -of -way dedication is in accordance with City policy and standards. g5 Dakota County will be requiring an additional 20' slope easement to facilitate the proposed 1989 reconstruction of Lexington Avenue. The City will be requiring a 10' permanent and an additional 15' temporary construction easement for the proposed construction of the storm sewer along the southerly boundary of the Development under Project #527. The grading plan indicates that no slope easements will be required from the adjacent properties. All regulatory agency permits shall be acquired within the appropriate time frame as required by the affected agency. ASSESSMENTS: City records show the following pending assessment o:r record: PROJ # DESCRIPTION RATE QUANTITY AMOUNT 527 Storm Sewer Lateral .2111 /sf 80,500 $16,994 TOTAL PENDING ASSESSMENT $16,994 The following assessments are proposed as a condition of final pat approval in accordance with City Special Assessment Policy #82 -1: PROJ # DESCRIPTION RATE QUANTITY AMOUNT 401 Storm Sewer Upgrade .027 /sf 130,682 $ 3,528 467 Trailway $13.00 /ff 748 9,724 467 Lateral Benefit Storm Sewer Trunk 10.05 /ff 205 2,060 450 Lateral Benefit Storm Sewer Trunk 30.88/ff 386.5 11,935 531 Street - Lexington Ave. 48.05/ff 311.5 14,968 TOTAL PROPOSED ASSESSMENT $42,215 All final assessment obligations will be calculated based on the quantites and dimensions of the final plat and in accordance with the rates in effect at-the time of the final plat approval. ALL SAINTS LUTHERAN CHURCH ADDITION CONDITIONS: 1. These standard conditions of plat approval as adopted by Council action on September 15, 1987 shall be complied with: Al, Bl, B2, B3, Cl, C2, C4, C5, D1, El, F1, and G1. 2. Any signage over 7' tall shall require a Conditional Use Permit. 3. Revise grading plan to provide drainage swales to minimize the potential for trapping runoff along the northerly side of the proposed building. 4. An additional catch basin is required in the southwest corner of the proposed parking area. 5. The Development is required to construct a manhole at the northerly terminus of the sanitary sewer line provided to serve the site. 6. The Development is required to provide a 20 foot slope easement along Lexington Avenue for future upgrading. 7. The Development is required to provide a 10 foot wide permanent and an additional 15 foot wide temporary construction easement along the southerly plat boundary. fr1 A. Assessments STANDARD CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL 1. This development shall accept its additional assessment obligations as defined in the staff's report in accordance with the final plat dimensions and the rates in effect at the time of final plat approval. B. Easements and Rights -of -Way 1. This development shall dedicate 10' drainage and utility easements centered over all common lot lines and adjacent to private property or public right -of -way. 2. This development shall dedicate, provide, or financially guarantee its proportionate share of the acquisition costs of additional drainage, ponding, and utility easements as required by the alignment, depth, and storage capacity of all required public utilities and streets located beyond the boundaries of this plat or outside of dedicated public right -of -way as necessary to service this development. 3. This development shall dedicate all public right -of -way and temporary slope easements for ultimate development of adjacent roadways as required by the appropriate jurisdictional agency. 4. This development shall dedicate adequate drainage and ponding easements to incorporate the required high water elevation necessitated by City storm water storage volume requirements. C. Plans and Specifications 1. All public streets and utilities necessary to provide service to this development shall be designed by a registered professional engineer in accordance with City codes a.nd engineering standards and policies, and approved by staff prior to final plat approval. 2. A detailed grading, drainage, erosion, and sediment control plan must be prepared in accordance with current City standards and approved by staff prior to final plat approval. 3. This development shall insure that all temporary dead end public streets shall have a cul -de -sac constructed in accordance with City engineering standards. 4. A detailed landscape plan shall be submitted on the proposed grading plan and approved by staff prior to the final plat approval. The financial guarantee shall be included in the Development Contract and not released until one year after the date of installation. S8' STANDARD CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL PAGE TWO D. Public Improvements E. Permits LTS #2 STANDARD 5. All internal public and private streets shall be constructed within the required right -of -way in accordance with City design standards. 1. I f any public improvements are to be installed under a City contract, the appropriate project must be approved by Council action prior to final plat approval. 1. This development shall be responsible for the acquisition of all regulatory agency permits in the time frame required by the affected agency. F. Parks Dedication 1. This development shall fulfull its parks dedication requirements as recommended by the Advisory Parks and Recreation Commission and approved by Council action. G. Other 1. All standard platting and zoning conditions shall be adhered to unless specifically granted a variance by Council action. Advisory Planning Commission City Council Approved: August 25, 1987 September 15, 1987 Revised: �9 Icl EA9.41 MUNICIPAL fi CENITN PP- 1,1 :PEsr,„, '".E • t. .`••2 • 2 al+cq Fir/PCP' L : Ow M 4 :••••' - - • ... D -1 :, 4 .;,„..G,,.. ;, . 4 1 1 1 ! - ....':- • .:, 1 • i Ili 0 1 Ai I 1 1 ■ ." ii _ Z I "ii -/ li iz 8 :1 A .1;1 . 2 . & I ;Iit.1:1iii- • f i 2 6 i I -. 3 i a I I Crl 1 - 1•••• 2 1 . . _._ 4 1 / CO / 321V il G S N 0 J. EI 14 I X 3 1 I 4 ell If ,......--____ • , ‘I ..f. / 1 il d i *%. I I , l ,, f l ' i t. 4 1 I I I 1 ;4 r - r ,..... .... 1 s 401 t• 1 ei ...J „-- \ -•,. / 1.. --- ofrolst - _ _ _ __ ___% _------ / i • —_, _ .......-"s. ' _ . as le ....__ ____--_.. ____-7 1 1 ‘, 1 . 1 1 .,* ,...._ ---.-.------ .....,, . ,, N ...'s. \ 1. 11,1 h .. ......, I• . 1, M •Of Iff •••• • f NV 110.1.• ON vI elf, ...::\. -. A.,.., •■ i I 1 1 _ --- -, •••••,.........: ■ ••••, 1 t- %. .... ............:i 1 1 1 1 l i l i t : i il l i I :i III!! •••• --- -. 1 , -.' - -- 's \ ‘ - \ 1\ • __- VIND ••■•■H I aVO t : 1 7 • \ I , 1 1 I I I 12 IF, I „, •. 11 1,-4--j \ • \ \.\ 1 .. i . * \ 1 1 \ I • 4: • , . ..,. 2 t i \ - 1 .. 1 4, 1 / I \ I 1 1 2 1 '' 4 1 . iii -- IN!' il \ ' ‘ \ // g 1 / / y j 1 \ • 1 \ 110 . ) . \ V \ ‘ / 1 e 1 / i ii , 1 / 1; ; 1 '11 1 1 I I I I I I 1 \ • \ • o \ o , o• .,” • 4,-' , \ \ i i :Ili 1. / , 1 \I \ \ \ 0 \ \ \ ........._ \ • • • \ • 1 I • ss N ■ ....., N.„ ".......„..... • N -- • N. --• •--"' -.. ■ N.- \ ‘.. ? - •1 - - ----. .., -■ . 1.. `, • _ : ..., ....., ........ N, . .... 1 ..., -■..'-- ' . . -_-_ _ .N . - -. .,--.."- -._- - ___ 1 _s' .1 - ------. . . . • - - : ..... ___.... ---...__,.......... -. .. -. . 1 ■ "" - .. ,•------...... -.' ■ --'•• ,.. - - - lb I , I ....•• -- - --..„ .. -- -..,..1 .' -'--__ __. .._ -- - . --... . . . , i -. .." -...****--"•!..... --.......'s,:' ..-- ' .--- • ------ - - - \ ., ,.., ..... -.._ -..%. 1 •, .---"------ 1 - r ) \ \ \ \ \ 1 \ ‘ 1. \ „,. • ---........ --... "...... '• --• -, ■ -... .... , . `. • s •--,.. I I : \ --.. / I it \ •., \ \ \ ( ■ ........_... , / I \ ...,. I \ •••-• 47 I • •■ \ • % \-- - ....• • . • : k 1 I s i I ..... _ ..... 01 ....}„..7.. sr .. 1•1170, 011•••• MUM/ S , NW an11.11 ...• ....47:1POSAS el ... \ ....„............./''' ‘ . \ ‘ P F.11.10. !I - a -11! > • i I ..1 1 .3, al i I l'•• i I i ;4- ij / I . 't , \ .: g it .. 1 ' \ I I / i i • . \ I a 4 N ‘ / i : I \ \ 1 I ‘..1 'l l- .• I is' II I %if '41 / IA' , I /1 1 / 1 I / -/ -. \ , _l_ \ • 0 . —i`.. \ N '''""::: .'• .... . 9... = .. .... , -....-. ..--.--. I ' _ _ , _,. 1 ...... L. .... t , •,,,; ,....„,•:- l'.' / ,.., •s. \t -}, .17 .7**-1- ■••--,•-. ;7- i I " N. --.• •-••• -. ---- '''. - \ . • '"..`:.':?..''" ''-'' 4.• A :-..,,...,..,.>t' : i ,, ..,...\ ,. ,•;." \ • ,. ..., ....-='- - -- fge- - \--- .. si 0 k•h 2- % \ ss, N 1 . . 10•11-fl•-••• •Il : • 1 I H-• Mat Nalltft NOM — % ' \ ' s ••••7 ..NJ s........ r •1 / / \ ,t1 — ---- — • , - ; 1 1 / 1,71. .0,7- 1 - 1 T -11 "1 -- I , .,_ 'MI •1 1 --.--t- (1 ',' 1 r ■ . ,--/—., —, -__ I ......-,--- , ..-.....- /-. , - * - $ -,-....... • ---- •-•.--.., •-•■• • - _,--,' .1.. . ! . 1 • ai (--) ---, 1 1 --- --------1 ,;,_ ,_ „.1 I t 7 I .; ; ' . . I 0 lia I "- , 1 \ ; I 1 ca L t .)); ,. .;N:11111 ; 6 I 1 I I .. f (./ L- -- i „,-,4' 1 ; \ !;4 1., ---- _ ! .- • ;',, 1 1 !-;,. li) 1 ,......,„. ,........„ -,...., 'N. , 1 i r I . \ • ; , tl, \ • ' • 1 I \ ''' ' I ) 1 1 1 4\1 , r - a) i i : 1 1” ; t , c .-.) ? „ I I/ .1.() i II _ ! y [ ; ; I !Ilii; ' I ; - -a, \ ' '---- ----- \ \ 1 1 i 1 \ \ 1 \\ \‘‘ --.. --- ----4 ,„... 16 " \ \ itt- ----- . , 1 d ; --a ------. I - \ \ „ . \ '' %, N ' - 7 - --• i ....___.,.- , - ■,;_4 -\ \ ';‘4 \ \,\ \ I \ / --) \ \ \ ( / \ I I ' ' \ \ \ \ 1 i'5"Z ".' . • .1 7a. / / , , / , , ,f,. ' • , ; --- 1 1 • =\ \\1\1\ - - , • 1 1 . \ - \' 't - • \ ! \\\\Id 1- 4.^, • \ \ 3 a c, �3 g s .rc'o 131 34 3410 i311. 31 sr's' 136 74 12134 73 ir•o c dc 156.57 A 575 7 5 --•■■■■=1.111•1M. 3 111L • • r • • . • • 0 g • — I 1 141_ A 6 0 *_ WESCOTT 16 0.1.0 mem ime 111111111111WINI MI MIMI 2% - - ' .::• •1•1•1•:. ...11-1•1•1•1 y.......... . 15 21 :•:•'•:•:•:•:•:-.• '-'-'::::::::::::::::::::-..... , - - ::::::::::::::::::.• c, :::::.:::::::::::::: . ' •:::::::::::::::.:.::. .....•• •• 16 r. 41,. : CP 5 9 .1 .1. J ..... •........../......... "V 'I :•:.: ...*:•:•:•:•......:•:•: we r ' .1-1. ••••:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•... / 1. B R i';!," .■ '0 ' Z ' 17 .-.- ."., r b / • 1-1•11•1•1::::::::::::•:::::::::': 1:1:: :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::•:•:: 3 4rod c.l'E sip, g et.," .■1 .. 1. ). ,.-' ' el 1 6 O 41 .-- 4- - ,/ - 0 1, 1 3 4 7 2 :::: f:::::::::: " • • • : ::.:.:....:.:.::::-::::::::::::::::::... .: . .:......:.:.:.:.:.:.:... . . • - • - •.:.:.:.:::.:.:.:::.:::::::::::. 589 ", 4 • '3 0 1 : :•".• -:•:::::•:•:•:•:•:•:•:. • • ••••:::::::;:.:•:•::::;:•::::::::::::;:::::.:.... . .6. :•:•%•:•:•:•:::: * * • • 15 •••". '.•::::•:•:•'• :: ::: 1:.:•;;:::::::::::::•.... 1•1•11•1•1•1•1•:•:::::::-..... ...1:1•::::::::::::::::::::::::::::••••• -.6, 3 s roc WI , 3 5 ' 1 .1. - -\,,-1.1,11511 394 1 4 c 0 i' l 22 it *00 ' OCrE t33.114 57135 75 0 .. 1 1 - K E T T N 87 11 0 2 0 - 2 : 5SAVANNAH 14 SY 2, W'511 160.41 3 4 23 F6 wodocy/ 32 44 r- 13 117.41 3 12 s.sio•sesel. 5 s rod od't oc 33 54 • 21 <1C 11•4•11111'34C. 5114°00'00'1. min= LATERAL BENEFIT — STORM TRUNK — 205 F.F. STORM SEWER UPGRADE — 3.00 ACRES 12 8 22 9 6 —11'5 ‘ 14.1 .4% t5 03 , 7501 75 13 771 1,1 C 2 75 8 10 -0 s_ SA VANNAH _ 45.00 V■ 7SDO NG 11 0 .F B U F.Y II 1311 70 3 Or% Nit . .0 1 311 711 3 NIVII/Clat 1 21 . 131. 3 2 s sr's' set I u 54 .; 2 3 t woo' Jr 131.3? 72 22 s 8 eod ad( P r , a I 137.91 3 a.ss•te1s"2. • 117 9/09) 4 - $ we.' *1' t. . 1 13 59 21 s evoo'od't 0 0 ., p. .,-. . I 5 1 --, ;7 12 1 22 - 4 • CA .., 1. 5 .g no <, a c A t'? ■ .::-. • 11 It lavoo.acrt i 3 3 • 11 . ci s mert5Cd:: '7 0 47 4o ,-) szs 42 cc: 1.31045 2 05 _ 1 9 11499)obcr, 131 111 2 self 34 11 $ $P5IE 3 I roo'cxfc til so 3004 124.112 21 322 1 2SAVANNAH ROAD p. 3 4 25 15 2 WESCOTT 2-3 0 75.02 j 75 03 20 d. , IQ N .4 i tlifi°41;* ----- 4; t ■'., l's 90 2 97 05 11 922 99 — 1 55 79 7501 13 75 0 r 7 N K ETT 19 S A VAN NA H — 2 r0 3! 70 4s.co s 53Pc4 ocrt 1 4 2 1 9 , 7500 6 2 :1 1 b s rodocc Ct 14 713 ear Ca eer _ S ue 0■74, .1\4441 8 U F. Y immumminn L ATER AL BENEFIT - STORM TRUNK 386.5 F.F. MONISTREET IMPROVEMENTS - LEXINGTON AVENUE - 311.50 F.F. ''•_' ^ - ' R;'�__ _ WESCOTT 4) 12122 3 4 7 4 149x t 131 •• a .8494 4 014-25 s .."6 394 N S A 194T6aQi 47 59 Z4L 3.9 4 Ir' L. 324 2 SAVANNAH I 3 23 42 • x.40 4.510 05 144 a. 48 . 2 149.99 1 3 N Z 0 W f 'z 44 25 25 J TRAIL - 748 F.F. J .p c b , M 4' .•9•�'� 58 130 2 t o ' 0'O w 4+ 15 14 1 -� -- 1 44 04 n , ' s e?00' ao t i 6sJ 112-71 14 s &ma °L it 132 44 s 49.00' ccf 133 5) 1 }f /b0 adt 33.94 1 49°00'00'1 13 ' 7 12 arm, sirs r , 9 iio zi 3134 r � 130 13004 12442 123 R ROAD 134. 31 2 131 7e X ! 9roo0Qt. u .3s t' ▪ s oro0'o0t orfleset 141, es / ,� 134.37 • 3 (\ I 2 2 r s •s•9/silt 1 3erodod'C w 21 gr .4. • 25 p1 23 25 cr 1}- J 9 1 p4 7502 75 03 G n 20 21 9 ry° U !1 6tl °4o �� —` B RO 89.22 96 137.70 1 s erod od'c 14239 g^ 2 5 49'OdOd' 14 7.13 n 3 evoo' co' c r, A N U N 2 73 1 r 80 , 1 NI ,N L 80°0 3 �- - SAVANNAH _ 45.00 1 7500 • . ' - >,,f114. BUi Y 2 }f ,t.1 • JP 4`T`i..;, •849.2.1 0 . a. 85, /..3 i6{' d 'q CA.) L.S. - • / JP-10 820.8 830.0 JP -49 518.1 830.0 ` 2 • J ? 818.7 830.0 • JP-11 815.7 830.0 893.0 ' 8.955 2 Nova ' • 1 eaa i �. JP JP -63 899.7:.,',x' :y ' JP-'44 -- 1 890.7 8.95.7 r' 1' t <Q:,fii 3 6 � J -dd 1 � j3+ JP -32 885.7 888. / •' I z N� J. - h / JP 8" di SUBJECT PARCEL F • city of eagan PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT STORM SEWER MASTER PLAN approved: standard plate * Page 9 /PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES June 28, 1988 improvements assessed to his land. Mr. Foertsch stated the City has a right -of -way for Birch Street. Chairman Pawlenty informed Mr. Widstrom that the Commission was currently considering the waiver of plat only. He stated no construction would begin at this time and the preliminary plat request for the development would be discussed at the next month's APC meeting. He suggested Mr. Widstrom contact the developer before the next APC meeting to discuss his concerns. Mrs. Widstrom stated the surveyors cut their fences and their cattle were loose. Mr. Sturm stated the sketch submitted at the meeting was only a concept proposal from the developer and the preliminary plat would not be approved at the meeting. He stated all property owners would be notified of the next public hearing. He further stated he will get in touch with Mr. Widstrom before the next APC meeting and set up a meeting with the developer to discuss Mr. Widstrom's concerns. Mr. Devlin, 3555 Trails End, asked who would be assessed for the improvements of Birch Road. Mr. Foertsch stated the benefited property owners would be assessed for the improvements and there was no estimate of the cost at this time. Mr. Sheldon stated a feasibility report would be completed with the figures of the assessments before Council approves the plan. Mr. Sturm informed Mr. Devlin City staff will attempt to give him an estimate of the possible assessments it he calls the City. Member Wilkins stated there was a waiver of plat granted last month at the APC meeting and for which property. Mr. Sturm stated Mr. Devlin sold five acres to Mr. Widstrom. Member Wilkins stated she felt the applicant should have attended the public hearing. She suggested denying the request. Mr. Voracek stated there was not a policy that applicants had to appear at the public hearings. Trygg moved, Graves seconded, the motion to approve the waiver of plat to allow a conveyance of land located in the southwest quarter of Section 14, south of Birch Street. All voted affirmatively. VANMAN CONSTRUCTION COMPANY - ALL SAINTS LUTHERAN CHURCH ADDITION Chairman Pawlenty opened the next public hearing regarding the application for a comprehensive guide plan amendment, planned development amendment (rezoning), and preliminary plat of approximately 4 acres zoned R -1 within the Lexington South Planned Development to a PF (public facilities) district within the planned /06 Page 10 /PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES June 28, 1988 development for a church site located at the southeast intersection of Lexington Avenue and Wescott Roaa in the northwest quarter of Section 23. Assistant Planner Jim Sturm informed the Commission that existing homes within the Lexington Square Addition abut this site on the south and on the east. One access point onto Wescott Road will serve the 160 seat church building. Ample expansion area is available to the east as well as parking lot area to the south. Code requires one parking stall per each three and one -half seats based upon capacity. Forty -five ten -foot wide stalls are required and 79 will be provided with the first phase of construction. He statea all code building and parking setbacks had been adhered to. He noted the scale of the building relates nicely to the adjacent single family homes. The building will be a one -story brick exterior with a gabled roof line. The proposed landscape plan screens the parking lot area from Wescott Road and the residential area. Six -foot tall Colorado blue spruce will be planted with the first phase of construction. A six -foot tall berm will be constructed along the southern property line and seeded immediately. Gary Lands, Vanman Construction, stated it is the intention of the developer to meet all proposed conditions of the City. John Koury asked for clarification regarding the six -toot berm. Mr. Sturm stated the berm would be on the south side only. He suggested perhaps there could be an extension of the pine tree landscaping. Mr. Graves asked for a clarification of the staff's report regarding the streets /access /circulation. He asked it it should read "The development is proposing to take street access from northerly adjacent Wescott Road in one location which is approximately 40 feet west of the easterly property line." Mr. Sturm stated it was incorrect in the staff's report and Mr. Graves was correct. Mr. Graves asked if there was the potential problem for the building trapping water along its north side. The developer stated number 3 of the proposed conditions dealt with this problem. Mr. Voracek asked the developer why the parking lot was located near the residents' property and the building along the street. The developer stated it was their intention to present the church in the best light to the street with the berming of the parking lot to the residents. They would like the church to be most visible to the public. Mr. Graves questioned why there are so many churches along Lexington from Wescott to Diffley. Pastor Smith stated the property was purchased in 1982 from Jim Curry who offered the land to the /c ( Page 11 /PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES June 28, 1988 churches. He stated Lexington Avenue is very visible to the public and it was a consideration in locating their church in this area. Mr. Graves asked where the church was holding their services at the present time. Pastor Smith stated they are currently meeting at the Visitation School in Mendota. Mr. Pawlenty questioned if there could be additional berming. Mr. Sturm stated additional berming would be reviewed and perhaps further berming could be added to the final grade plan. Mr. Pawlenty asked if a condition could be added regarding additional berming. Mr. Sturm replied an additional condition regarding the berming could be added. Mr. Graves asked if there was proposed landscaping on the north side. Mr. Sturm stated there is no present plans for landscaping on the north side. Member Wilkins asked Pastor Smith if there would be a sign for the church. Pastor Smith said there would be a sign on Lexington and Wescott. Mr. Sturm stated there would be a sign erected which will be under seven feet tall and no special permit was required. Pastor Smith asked if the condition regarding the trees to be planted along Lexington Avenue could be postponed until the Lexington Avenue construction was completed. Mr. Graves stated it seemed a reasonable request. Mr. Sturm stated the City will recommend to delay the plantings along Lexington Avenue until the construction is complete. Member Wilkins asked when the Lexington upgrade project would begin. Mr. Foertsch stated in 1989. Wilkins moved, Graves seconded, the motion to approve the comprehensive guide plan amendment, the planned development amendment and rezoning of approximately 4 acres zoned R -1 within the Lexington South Planned Development to a PF (public facilities) district. All voted in favor. Wilkins moved, Voracek seconded, the motion to approve the preliminary plat for a church site located at the southeast intersection of Lexington Avenue and Wescott Road in the northwest quarter of Section 23, subject to the following conditions: 1. These standard conditions of plat approval as adopted by Council action on September 15, 1987 shall be complied with: Al, B1, B2, B3, Cl, C2, C4, C5, D1, El, F1 and G1 . 2. Any signage over 7 feet tall shall require a conditional use permit. 3. Revise grading plan to provide drainage swales to minimize the potential for trapping runoff along the northerly side of the proposed building. Page 12 /PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES June 28, 1988 4. An additional catch basin is required in the southwest corner of the proposed parking area. 5. The development is required to construct a manhole at the northerly terminus of the sanitary sewer line provided to serve the site. 6. The development is required to provide a 20 -foot slope easement along Lexington Avenue for future upgrading. 7. The development is required to provide a 10 -foot wide permanent and additional 15 -foot wide temporary construction easement along the southerly plat boundary. 8. Berming should be graduated from the southeast section towards the north to a three foot level with pine trees to be incorporated on top of the berm. All voted yes. Mr. Voracek stated it should be of record that condition C4 of the standard conditions of plat approval is to be complied with by the applicant. However, the installation of the landscaping along Lexington Avenue will be delayed until the construction on Lexington Avenue is completed. FEDERAL LAND COMPANY - TOWN CENTRE 70 TENTH ADDITION Chairman Pawlenty convened the public hearing in regard to the request for a preliminary plat of 1.91 CSC zoned acres and a conditional use permit to allow a car wash facility and motor fuel sales and a variance for a canopy setback located on a portion of existing Outlot B, Town Centre 70 First Addition or proposed Outlot A, Town Centre 70 Ninth Addition located between Highway 35E and Town Centre Drive in the northwest quarter of Section 15. Mr. Sturm stated Outlot A consists of 2.48 acres in the area between the Auto Mall and the recently final platted Ninth Addtion (Pizza Hut). The proposed car wash facility is on the southern 1.91 acres (Lot One) with the remaining .56 acres being platted as an outlot. He stated this site is flat, open grassland and falls rapidly towards Highway 35E from the back of the parking lot /drive lane curb. One divided access serves this facility that will be operated by the Mermaid Car Wash chain. All building and parking setbacks meet code requirements except for the two -pump isiana canopy adjacent to the 35E property line. Code requires a 50 -foot setback; 30 -foot is being proposed. Eighteen 10 -foot wide parking stalls are provided on the Town Centre Drive side of the building for employee use. The proposed pylon sign is consistent with the Town Centre sign agreement. Mr. Sturm stated the building itself contains 16,322 square feet or 19.3% of the entire lot; 30% is permitea in CSC districts. The exterior /03 Agenda Information Memo July 19, 1988, City Council Meeting TOWN CENTRE 70 TENTH ADDITION E. Preliminary Plat for Town Centre 70 Tenth Addition /Federal Land Company of 1.91 CSC Zoned Acres on a Conditional Use Permit to Allow a Car Wash Facility and Motor Fuel Sales and a Variance for a Canopy Setback Located on a Portion of Existing Outlot B, Town Centre 70 1st Addition or Proposed Outlot A, Town Centre 70 Ninth Addition - -A public hearing was held by the Advisory Planning Commission at their last regular meeting held on June 28, 1988 to consider separate applications submitted by Federal Land Company for a preliminary plat for the Town Centre 70 Tenth Addition, a conditional use permit to allow a car wash and motor fuel sales in a CSC district, and a setback variance of 20' for the gasoline pump island canopy. The APC is recommending a denial of the applications. Major issues for the denial were the building exterior materials and the lack of landscaping. For additional information on this item, refer to the Planning and Engineering department reports, a copy is enclosed on pages A 5 - through X. Also enclosed on page is a letter received from the President of the Auto Mall. For a copy of the APC minutes, refer to page(s) /40 through ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: 1) To approve or deny a preliminary plat entitled Town Centre 70 Tenth Addition, 2) a conditional use permit to allow a car wash facility and motor fuel sales, and 3) a variance for a canopy setback located on a portion of existing Outlot B, Town Centre 1st Addition or proposed Outlot A. Special Note: Enclosed on pages /25 through ` is an update on this item from the Planning Department. /a4 APPLICANT: FEDERAL LAND COMPANY LOCATION: OUTLOT A, TOWN CENTRE 70 9TH ADDITION EXISTING ZONING: CSC (COMMUNITY SHOPPING CENTER) DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: JUNE 28, 1988 DATE OF REPORT: JUNE 21, 1988 REPORTED BY: PLANNING AND ENGINEERING APPLICATION SUMMARY CITY OF EAGAN SUBJECT: PRELIMINARY PLAT CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT VARIANCE (TOWN CENTRE 70 10TH ADDITION) Separate applications have been submitted requesting a Preliminary Plat for the Town Centre 70 10th Addition, Conditional Use Permits to allow a car wash and motor fuel sales in a CSC (community shopping center) district, and a setback Variance of 20' for the gasoline pump island canopy. The site is located on outlot A, Town Centre 70 9th Addition between Highway 35E and Town Centre Drive. Outlot A consists of 2.48 acres in the area between the auto mall and the recently final - platted 9th Addition (Pizza Hut). The proposed car wash facility is on the southern 1.91 acres (lot 1) with the remaining .56 acres being platted as an outlot. SITE PLAN This site is flat, open grassland and falls rapidly towards Highway 35E from the back of the parking lot /drive lane curb. One divided access serves this facility that will be operated by the Mermaid Car Wash chain. All building and parking setbacks meet Code requirements except for the two -pump island canopy adjacent to the 35E property line. Code requires a 50' setback; 30' is proposed. Eighteen 10' -wide parking stalls are provided on the Town Centre Drive side of the building for employee use. The proposed pylon sign is consistent with the Town Centre sign agreement. The building itself contains 16,322 sq. ft. or 19.3% of the entire lot; 30% is permitted in CSC districts. The exterior finish of the one -story flattopped roof facility is concrete block or rock face block, grey /brown in color. Since this site is perched above Highway 35E, the freeway corridor image is a concern. Landscape plant material should be consistent in size and species with the auto mall facility to provide an overall continuity in the area. GRADING /DRAINAGE /EROSION CONTROL: The proposed site was previously rough graded as a part of the Town Centre Development. Minimal site grading is required for site development and site drainage is planned to be intercepted internally and conveyed by a storm sewer to the existing storm sewer in Town Centre Drive. The existing storm sewer in Town Centre Drive is of sufficient capacity to handle the runoff generated by the site development. The development is required to provide a minimum of a 3 CFS outlet to the northerly adjacent proposed Outlot A. No erosion and sediment control plan was submitted for review as a part of this application. The storm water from this site is conveyed by a storm sewer to Pond JP -66 and then to Fish Lake. Several erosion and sediment control practices will be required to minimize sediment transport to the storm sewer and the receiving water bodies. No site development will be allowed until an appropriate erosion and sediment control plan is submitted, reviewed, and approved by staff. UTILITIES: Sanitary sewer of sufficient depth and capacity to serve this site is readily available in Town Centre Drive. A 6" sanitary sewer service has been provided to the property line. Water main service of sufficient capacity and pressure is readily available in Town Centre Drive. The Development proposes to take its water main service from the existing water service stub provided. Sufficient fire hydrant protection was provided as a part of the Town Centre Development. STREETS /ACCESS /CIRCULATION: Access to the site is taken directly from Town Centre Drive. A proposed 30' wide ingress and a 30' wide egress driveway are proposed. EASEMENTS /RIGHTS -OF- WAY /PERMITS: Sufficient right -of -way for Town Centre Drive was provided with the platting of the Town Centre Development. The appropriate storm sewer easement is required for the storm sewer line which is providing an outlet to the northerly adjacent outlot. All regulatory agency permits shall be acquired within the appropriate time frame as required by the affected agency. ASSESSMENTS: In accordance with the special assessment policies in effect at the time of the platting of Town Centre 70 Addition, the proposed parcel has been assessed for sanitary sewer trunk, water trunk and water availability charge under Project *58 and storm sewer trunk under Project #429. A search of City records show the following pending assessments of record: PROJ# DESCRIPTION RATE QUANTITY AMOUNT 443 Storm sewer 5,910 /ac 4.3289 $25,412 easement 519 Street Lights 4,021 TOTAL PENDING ASSESSMENTS $29,433 In accordance with special assessment policies in effect at this time, the following assessments are proposed as a condition of final plat approval: PROJ# DESCRIPTION RATE QUANTITY AMOUNT 429 Storm Sewer Lateral $2,458/ac. 1.95 $ 4,793 TOTAL PROPOSED ASSESSMENT $ 4,793 The proposed assessment reflects a change in the City's special assessment policy. In the past, lateral assessments were based on the construction of laterals to the property's boundary rather than to the City's trunk system. The current policy is to base the lateral assessment on the cost to reach the trunk system. The proposed assessment is the pro rated share of the total cost of the Town Centre Development's storm sewer lateral connection to the City trunk system. All final assessment obligations will be calculated based on the quantities and dimensions of the final plat and in accordance with the rates in effect at the time of the final plat approval. TOWN CENTRE 70 10TH ADDITION CONDITIONS: 1. These standard conditions of plat approval as adopted by Council action on September 15, 1987 shall be complied with: Al, BI, B2, C2, C4, D1, El, F1, and Gl. 2. All signage shall be subject to the one -time sign fee of $2.50 per square foot. 3. Outlot A will share the access for the car wash facility. 4. The Development is required to provide a 3 CFS storm sewer outlet to serve the northerly adjacent proposed Outlot A. MI A. Assessments STANDARD CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL 1. This development shall accept its additional assessment obligations as defined in the staff's report in accordance with the final plat dimensions and the rates in effect at the time of final plat approval. B. Easements and Rights -of -Way 1. This development shall dedicate 10' drainage and utility easements centered over all common lot lines and adjacent to private property or public right -of -way. 2. This development shall dedicate, provide, or financially guarantee its proportionate share of the acquisition costs of additional drainage, ponding, and utility easements as required by the alignment, depth, and storage capacity of all required public utilities and streets located beyond the boundaries of this plat or outside of dedicated public right -of -way as necessary to service this development. 3. This development shall dedicate all public right -of -way and temporary slope easements for ultimate development of adjacent roadways as required by the appropriate jurisdictional agency. 4. This development shall dedicate adequate drainage and ponding easements to incorporate the required high water elevation necessitated by City storm water storage volume requirements. C. Plans and Specifications 1. All public streets and utilities necessary to provide service to this development shall be designed by a registered professional engineer in accordance with City codes and engineering standards and policies, and approved by staff prior to final plat approval. 2. A detailed grading, drainage, erosion, and sediment control plan must be prepared in accordance with current City standards and approved by staff prior to final plat approval. 3. This development shall insure that all temporary dead end public streets shall have a cul -de -sac constructed in accordance with City engineering standards. 4. A detailed landscape plan shall be submitted on the proposed grading plan and approved by staff prior to the final plat approval. The financial guarantee shall be included in the Development Contract and not released until one year after the date of installation. STANDARD CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL PAGE TWO 5. All internal public and private streets shall be constructed within the required right -of -way in accordance with City design standards. D. Public Improvements 1. If any public improvements are to be installed under a City contract, the appropriate project must be approved by Council action prior to final plat approval. E. Permits 1. This development shall be responsible for the acquisition of all regulatory agency permits in the time frame required by the affected agency. F. Parks Dedication 1. This development shall fulfull its parks dedication requirements as recommended by the Advisory Parks and Recreation Commission and approved by Council action. G. Other 1. All standard platting and zoning conditions shall be adhered to unless specifically granted a variance by Council action. Advisory Planning Commission City Council Approved: August 25, 1987 September 15, 1987 Revised: LTS #2 STANDARD //a � i, 6. rt coos ROO LiLil ;MIN 11,LI;LillIG) • •411741151.0 • 1.31S11 7 • t ' /0 , •iot.ansea •■•11•11 HSVM blV3 OIVINEI3V1 / / .„ / / / NORTH • '*'srcR^.t'r -rev -• • err- -^„'-�"r 3^�?'.?.:�•��:i; "�T'ri �;' • /i HSVM tlVO OMVWM31H Avg HSVM HVD OIVWH3111 /14- C LAI V' 111■11101• 11011300111103 Clii31111111103 11,110 ;II amema. / /6" HSVM EIVO NORTH z -J a. )f. A ' "S!1 1 111i `I ) J ' Ss 1 \ ll� HSVM HV3 0IVW1:13W tr' G'. R /-... I I Y� 3 .I c � � 1 I I 1 l._ !,11J,2.t.. ,.91 I • Li { • 1) ft4w-.44C 411,4 1) ` 4 -) 05" 4 i 5 8 0 • ; j ' . I ,; , • city of eagan 1172-T4 PUBLIC :r WORKS DEPARTMEN DP- 4 1 874.8 874.8 8.8 . . L 79 IcoAD D-p rr), : DP-20 D-r 904. 2 DP-231_1_ _ DP- 844,0 ' •.; 1.0 11'1 :., ••:,,, --- P, 7 6 7,, 0 t'.. i . .' 2 . 1- 880,q ., 7- i,..or 111_1 2 * 893.0 1 N_ - D-c 8 ?r. 6 -(-•/ L.ArtY PARK., 882 . c•4 11 ‘1.1.117:7 " 884 DP ,L: - •, • • 890.0 4.1 871D %"*■••,:,■;•q!?.)'•?..-,"\f'-'‘..' ‘.1 880.0-, , 41, C N 11Z.12 c;Zky 69. , •rn .;■• "'1 Jp-15 844.0 84615: L.S. - 14 CITY 1 HALL 11 35; L.S.-7 : 112112 /1 i (A) /T '--'—/ 888.7 901•5 e ' ';...Z , ‘ 1 — - • - - , I.. : , 1.[..3.F-t;,11.1.....- . 03 .--,- t.i. i -. lc .1i---` .--'. i -,- , ..-...... 7..,,-11 t_....... , -. rj .,; 1 '.1..1.111 ...... . ,..„_. Li:: ,-, t ..-- ,-....— r ----- r1 I 01 JP-11 815.7 830.0 DP- ,886 892 Imre JP-E 893. 895. 12" SUBJECT PARCEL FIG4I T STORM SEWER MASTER PLAN approved: standard plate July 8, 1988 Honorable Mayor Vic Ellison and Council Members of the Eagan City Council 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55121 RE: Proposed Car Wash, Eagan Town Centre Dear Mayor and Councilmembers: We are the owners of the Eagan Auto Mall, located at the intersection of Pilot Knob Road and Duckwood Drive in Eagan Town Centre. The purpose of this letter is to indicate our support for the proposed full service car wash to be located adjacent to the Auto Mall. We feel this use would be complementary and not competitive. We further think that the location of this car wash, adjacent to our Auto Mall, continues the policy of concentrating automotive service uses at key locations within the community. We hope that the City Council will look favorably upon this request. Sincerely, 9 )-1 Jeff Sweet President JS /amw 'u- Blvd 4 26 v Z ata � 55 rlin 612,546 Page 12 /PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES June 28, 1988 4. An additional catch basin is required in the southwest corner of the proposed parking area. 5. The development is required to construct a manhole at the northerly terminus of the sanitary sewer line provided to serve the site. 6. The development is required to provide a 20 -foot slope easement along Lexington Avenue for future upgrading. 7. The development is required to provide a 10 -foot wide permanent and additional 15 -foot wide temporary construction easement along the southerly plat boundary. 8. Berming should be graduated from the southeast section towards the north to a three foot level with pine trees to be incorporated on top of the berm. All voted yes. Mr. Voracek stated it should be of record that condition C4 of the standard conditions of plat approval is to be complied with by the applicant. However, the installation of the landscaping along Lexington Avenue will be delayed until the construction on Lexington Avenue is completed. FEDERAL LAND COMPANY - TOWN CENTRE 70 TENTH ADDITION Chairman Pawlenty convened the public hearing in regard to the request for a preliminary plat of 1.91 CSC zoned acres and a conditional use permit to allow a car wash facility and motor fuel sales and a variance for a canopy setback located on a portion of existing Outlot B, Town Centre 70 First Addition or proposed Outlot A, Town Centre 70 Ninth Addition located between Highway 35E and Town Centre Drive in the northwest quarter of Section 15. Mr. Sturm stated Outlot A consists of 2.48 acres in the area between the Auto Mall and the recently final platted Ninth Addtion (Pizza Hut). The proposed car wash facility is on the southern 1.91 acres (Lot One) with the remaining .56 acres being platted as an outlot. He stated this site is flat, open grassland and falls rapidly towards Highway 35E from the back of the parking lot /drive lane curb. One divided access serves this facility that will be operated by the Mermaid Car Wash chain. All building and parking setbacks meet code requirements except for the two -pump island canopy adjacent to the 35E property line. Code requires a 50 -foot setback; 30 -foot is being proposed. Eighteen 10 -foot wide parking stalls are provided on the Town Centre Drive side of the building for employee use. The proposed pylon sign is consistent with the Town Centre sign agreement. Mr. Sturm stated the building itself contains 16,322 square feet or 19.3% of the entire lot; 30% is permited in CSC districts. The exterior /zO Page 13 /PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES June 28, 1988 finish of the one -story flat- topped roof facility is concrete block or rock face block, gray /brown in color. He informed the Commission that since this site is perched above Highway 35E, the freeway corridor image is a concern. He feels the landscape plant material should be consistent in size with the Auto Mall facility to provide an overall continuity in the area. He stated the proposed pylon sign meets code and no special permits would be required. Mr. Sturm noted that the proposed condition 3 may be deleted if the application is approved as the matter has been taken care of. Charles Bartholdi, Federal Land Company, clarified for the Commission where the proposed property is located. He stated the lot for the car care facility will be 1.95 acres in size leaving a .51 acre outlot. He stated the extra portion of the outlot will be ties in with the original Outlot B tor tuture development. Mr. Bartholai stated it will be serviced by the present utility services. Mr. Bartholdi introduced Ray Berg of the Esberg Corporation who is the actual developer of the car wash. Mr. Berg stated they are ready to comply with all City requirements. Chairman Pawlenty asked if there would be berming along the freeway. Mr. Berg stated there will be berming along the freeway and he is willing to extend the plantings with low level trees and shrubs. However, he does not want to completely hide the building from the public view. Member Trygg asked what the height of the building would be when constructed. Mr. Berg stated the height of the building will be sixteen feet. Mr. Voracek asked what the exterior finish of the building would be if constructed. Mr. Berg stated it would be similar to the Auto Mall, only inverted. Voracek asked if the blocks would be painted. Mr. Berg stated there is the possibility the block would be stained. Member Trygg asked what the roof line of the building would be. Mr. Berg stated it is a flat roof line. Mr. Voracek questioned the number of employees. Mr. Berg stated depending on the time of day, there would be between four to six employees to the maximum of twelve to fifteen. Mr. Voracek asked if it was an automatic car wash. Mr. Berg stated it is a full service car wash which is managed by a crew. All cars are handled by the staff. And all functions of the car wash are handled within the building, including the drying of the vehicle. Chairman Pawlenty stated he is concerned about the appearance from the freeway and within the mall itself. Mr. Berg stated the car wash does not look like the "normal" car wash. It has a high quality P1 Page 14 /PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES June 28, 1988 image. Mr. Berg presented photographs of the Apple Valley facility to the Commission for their review. Mr. Merkley asked what the elevation of the canopy would be. Mr. Berg stated it is twelve feet below the roof line. Mr. Merkley was concerned that with the ground slope to the freeway, the canopy would stick out. He feels the canopy should be deleted from the plan. Mr. Berg explained he feels the canopy enhances the traffic flow. However, presently in the Apple Valley facility there is no canopy. He is prepared to screen the canopy with plantings on the freeway side. Mr. Merkley stated the City is attempting to create a nice freeway image. Mr. Berg informed the Commission the facility will blend in with the shopping center in appearance; the facility will not look like a block building. Mr. Graves asked if the driveways were the furthest possible point away from the Auto Mall drive. Mr. Berg stated that is correct. Mr. Berg explained the drawings to the Commission. Mr. Voracek was concerned regarding the underground gas tanks being located under the landscaping and not under the bituminous surface area. Mr. Sturm stated it was purposely planned that way. It there should be a problem with the tanks, there would be the need to tear up the parking roadway and disrupt the car wash services. Mr. Graves asked if there was a need for gas pumps with the car wash facility. Mr. Berg stated the gas sales is secondary to their operation and is a convenience to their customers. The pump line also enhance the traffic patterns. Mr. Graves asked it there were wash only lanes. Mr. Berg stated there are two gas pump lanes and two wash only lanes. Chairman Pawlenty asked the Commission members if the car wash facility was the type of facility the City wanted along the freeway; and if so, is this the appearance of the buildings the City desired for this location. Mr. Berg informed the Commission there is a new design for the exterior of the building regarding the configuration of the building. Mr. Pawlenty asked if it was still the same exterior block. Mr. Berg stated the rock type of block looks very similar to brick. Mr. Merkley questioned the roof line on the Auto Mall. Mr. Sturm replied it is canopy and not flat. Member Wilkins asked if the corners were square and if there was a columnar effect. Mr. Berg stated there was a columnar effect with variances of textures and design. Chairman Pawlenty asked the developer to present to the Commission samples of the proposed brick. Mr. Graves stated he would also like to see a proposed vegetation layout. Mr. Berg said that /2 2- Page 15 /PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES June 28, 1988 they are willing to increase the vegetation. Mr. Merkley asked if there would be an increase of landscaping along the full front area. Mr. Berg stated they would be glad to add more landscaping as requested by the Commission. Mr. Graves stated he likes the idea of the car wash in Eagan. However, he is not certain it should be located next to the Super America which pumps gasoline also. He would also like the facility to be more shielded from the freeway. He dislikes the canopy and requests more specific drawings of the exterior of the building be presented to the Commission. Mr. Berg stated they are willing to work with staff on any concerns of the Commission. Garry suggested a motion should be made to continue the application of Federal Land Company regarding the Town Centre 70 Tenth Addition. Mr. Merkley stated he would like to have a proposed site line drawing presentee to the Commission for their review. Mr. Berg stated he will present any drawings or samples to the Commission that they request. He felt he had complied with all City requirements and if they fell short in their presentation, he would be happy to present them to the Commission. However, considering the timeframe, he would like to start construction on his project in the very near future. Member Trygg asked if there was the necessity for two conditional use permits, one to allow a car wash facility ana one to allow motor fuel sales. Mr. Sturms stated there was only the necessity for one conditional use permit. Member Wilkins stated that condition C4 of the standard conditions for plat approval allows staff to review the landscape plan. Chairman Pawlenty stated he has no problem with the staff reviewing the final landscape plan. However, he was concerned regarding the exterior brick. Mr. Berg again asked the Commission to inform him what they requested and he would comply. Mr. Bartholdi stated that his company's architectural review committee would review Mr. Berg's proposal and would probably request brick or polished block for the project. Mr. Voracek stated the project should not be delayed. He suggested a condition that the developer must present its proposal for the exterior of the building and the landscaping to the Council before Council approves the project. Mr. Garry stated that the standard plat conditions and the additional conditions to the project was understandable. However, with this project he felt there were too many unanswered questions. He appreciated the developer's timeframe; however, he requested more information before approval of the project. /Z3 Page 16 /PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES June 28, 1988 Member Voracek stated this is a preliminary plat approval request, not a final approval for the plat. Mr. Bartholdi stated the developers had submitted everything that was requested of them by the City. Voracek moved, Wilkins seconded, the motion to approve the preliminary plat of 1.91 CSC zoned acres and a conditional use permit to allow a car wash facility and motor fuel sales on a portion of existing Outlot B, Town Centre 70 First Addition or proposed Outlot A, Town Centre 70 Ninth Addition located between Highway 35E and Town Centre Drive in the northwest quarter of Section 15, subject to the following conditions: 1. These standard conditions of plat approval as adopted by Council action on September 15, 1987 shall be complied with: Al, B1, B2, C2, C4, D1, El, F1, and G1 . 2. All signage shall be subject to the one -time sign fee of $2.50 per square foot. 3. The development is required to provide a 3 CFS storm sewer outlet to serve the northerly adjacent proposed Outlot A. 4. There shall be landscape screening along the freeway side of the facility to shield the canopy. 5. The building shall be constructed of brick or of a texture suitable to the surrounding facilities developed in the area. Voracek, Trygg and Wilkins voted in favor; Pawlenty, Garry, Merkley and Graves voted against. The motion failed. Graves again stated he does not like the canopy on the facility. Mr. Berg asked the Commission to inform him what they requested and he would work with the staff. Chairman Pawlenty asked if the matter would now go to the Council. Mr. Sheldon stated the car wash facility is a conditional use in a CSC zone. Member Wilkins stated the Commission should direct the developer to present new landscape plans, the building exterior plans, and their proposal for the canopy. Member Trygg stated she opposed the motion because of the fuel sales question. MEMO TO: DALE RUNKLE, CITY PLANNER TOM HEDGES, CITY ADMINISTRATOR FROM: JIM STURM, PLANNER 1 RE: TOWN CENTRE 70 10TH ADDITION At the June 28 Advisory Planning Commission meeting, the applications for a Preliminary Plat, Conditional Use permits for a full service car wash and motor fuel sales and a Variance for a canopy setback were denied for a combination of reasons, including: 1. The landscape plan was not consistent with other commercial projects in the City. 2. The building exterior was proposed as gray /brown concrete block. 3. The canopy for the gasoline pumps required a 20' setback variance along the freeway frontage and there is a Superamerica in the auto mall. Since that time, a revised landscape plan has been prepared that addresses the concerns expressed by the Advisory Planning Commission. This plan is well done and relates nicely to the auto mall to the immediate south. Building elevation drawings are being rendered for the Council meeting and the applicant will also bring samples of the proposed exterior. The free standing canopy will be eliminated if the Council desires and an alternate plan will be prepared that attaches it to the building. The canopy is important to the applicant because they feel it helps define the drive lane and car 'drop off' area. Attached is the revised landscape plan for your review. Planner 1 JS /js Attach. 0 O z ••• !t” " t 1 A .; /J l 1 • ag e 4 / ' At rr r F ' l orma — /z6 ••• IIMOSUMErs 3 NW T 0 a ( iS 111 il‘t {{� It It et; A�M. D N Agenda Information Memo July 19, 1988, City Council Meeting RAHNCLIFF 2ND ADDITION F. Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment for Rahncliff 2nd Addition, Rezoning of 16.08 Limited Business and Roadside Business Acres to a Commercial Planned Development District and a Preliminary Plat - -A public hearing was held by the Advisory Planning Commission at their last regular meeting held on June 28, 1988 to consider applications for the rezoning of 5.6 Limited Business and 11.2 Roadside Business to a Commercial Planned Development District and a preliminary plat for the Rahncliff 2nd Addition. In addition, a Comprehensive Guide Plan amendment is required. The APC is recommending approval of the applications. For additional information on this item, refer to staff report, copies enclosed on pages /L' through For a copy of the APC minutes, refer to page (s) /.S through / Q . ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny 1) a Comprehensive Guide Plan amendment for Rahncliff 2nd Addition, 2) rezoning of 16.08 Limited Business and Roadside Business acres to a Commercial Planned Development, and 3) a preliminary plat entitled Rahncliff 2nd Addition. lz7 LOCATION: NW 1/4 OF SECTION 32 EXISTING ZONING: LB (LIMITED BUSINESS) RB (ROADSIDE BUSINESS) DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: JUNE 28, 1988 DATE OF REPORT: JUNE 21, 1988 REPORTED BY: PLANNING AND ENGINEERING DEPARTMENTS APPLICATION SUMMARY Separate applications have been submitted requesting a Rezoning of 5.6 LB (limited business) and 11.2 RB (roadside business) acres to a commercial Planned Development district, and a Preliminary Plat for the Rahncliff 2nd Addition. This site is located between Rahn Road and Highway 35E along the south side of Cliff Road. The uses proposed for this development are consistent with the existing zoning districts. The Planned Development zoning allows the City the opportunity to review the overall development at this time as opposed to individual requests on each lot. Also, architectural landscaping and signage compatibility will be addressed with this plat. Even though the uses are consistent with the existing commercial zoning, a Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment will be necessary. SITE PLAN This site is very flat and highly visible from Highway 35E. There is no significant vegetation to be concerned with. Access will be primarily from the previously constructed Rahn Cliff Court with two secondary drives connecting to Rahn Road. Shared parking areas provide 832 stalls, well above the amount required by Code (730 - 815). The following is a breakdown of each area and proposed use. Lot 1, block 1 Lot 2, block 1 Outlot A Lot 1, block 2 Outlot B Outlot C (1.1 acres) (1.1 acres) (2.7 acres) (3.8 acres) (1.8 acres) ( .8 acres) CITY OF iAGAN SUBJECT: COMPREHENSIVE GUIDE PLAN AMENDMENT REZONING PRELIMINARY PLAT (RAHNCLIFF 2ND ADDITION) APPLICANT: AUSTIN COMPANIES 7,000 SF 11,200 SF 20,000 SF 50,000 SF 12,000 SF 5,000 SF Bank Retail Retail (possibly 2 bldgs) Multi -level (1 -3 stories) office with 60 under- ground parking spaces Retail Restaurant Lot 1, block 3 ( .8 acres) 3,500 SF Fast -food (Burger King) Lot 2, block 3 (1.4 acres) 10,000 SF Retail Lot 3, block 3 (3.3 acres) 18,400 SF Retail Detailed site plans have been submitted for the office building; lot 2, block 1; and lot 3, block 3 for City approval at this time. All lots and outlots will require site plan review and approval by the Advisory Planning Commission and the City Council before any construction occurs. All building and parking setbacks meet Code requirements except for the 10' drive -lane setback (20' is required) along Cliff Road, the 17' parking setback (20' is required) along Highway 35E, and the 30' building setback (50' is required) along the highway for the office building. No separate action is necessary for these deviations if the site plans are approved due to the Planned Development zoning. The extensive landscaping proposed along those areas screens the parking area nicely and there is no parking proposed between the office building and the highway. The overall landscape plan for the sixteen acres is very well done. The plant material selection, proposed spacing, and quantities will visually tie the development together. Additional evergreens will be added along the highway to provide year -round color. Almost all of the sizes are above City requirements. The buildings will be constructed on all sides with light and dark brick, accented with rock -faced block or stucco and metal canopies. All trash areas will be contained within the buildings except for the fast -food restaurant which will have it next to the building and made of the same materials. An overall sign plan was submitted requesting two 30' -tall development signs located at the entry points along Cliff and Rahn Roads and six 7' -tall monument signs located throughout the site. They are architecturally compatible with each other as well as with the buildings; however, they should be reduced to the 27'- maximum height allowed by Code. Individual tenant pylon signs have been proposed in three locations. GRADING /DRAINAGE /EROSION CONTROL: The proposed site has been previously rough graded and minimal site grading is required for site development. The Development is proposing to intercept all internal site generated storm water runoff and convey it to the existing City storm sewer system. A detailed analysis of the proposed internal parking lot storm sewer system was not performed at this time, but the following general requirements should be noted: 1. No direct connection to the existing 21" storm sewer along the south side of Cliff Road will be allowed. 2. No direct connection to the existing 18" storm sewer line along the westerly side of I -35E will be allowed. 3. The Development is limited to approximately 10 CFS of storm water runoff which it can discharge directly into the existing 30" storm sewer which crosses Cliff Road at the northeasterly corner of the Development and flows into Pond AP -42. All remaining site generated runoff must be routed through Pond AP -44 prior to discharge into the existing City storm sewer system. 4. No encroachment below the 918 high water elevation for Pond AP -44 will be allowed. 5. The Development will be responsible for rerouting the existing storm sewer system in Rahn Cliff Court which discharges into the existing 18" storm sewer along the westerly side of I -35E. The runoff from this area is required to drain into Pond AP -44. A major water resource for this site is the impact of development on the water quality of Cliff Lake (Pond AP -11). Cliff Lake has been classified as a Type 2 recreational water body in the Eagan Preliminary Water Quality Plan. The potential impacts on Cliff Lake were estimated using models developed by William Walker, Jr. The proposed land use and increase in impervious area resulting from site development will increase the phosphorus loading to Cliff Lake by approximately 30 pounds. The Development will be required to reduce phosphorus runoff into Cliff Lake to predevelopment levels. There are two options available to reduce the impacts of site development on the water quality of Cliff Lake. 1. Constructing two 0.4 acre ponds, each with 1.0 acre feet of storage onsite will reduce phosphorus runoff into Cliff Lake to approximately predevelopment levels. 2. Increasing the wet pond volume on Pond AP -42 to approximately 4.3 acre feet and increasing the wet pond volume of Pond AP -44.2 by approximately 1 acre foot will also reduce phosphorus loading to Cliff Lake to predevelopment levels. A preliminary erosion and sediment control plan was submitted for staff review at this time. The following erosion and sediment control practices are needed to be implemented during the building phase and shown on the appropriate grading, drainage and erosion control plan prior to any site development: 1. Storm sewer inlet filters in depressional areas and other appropriate locations. 2. Silt fence along portions of Rahn Cliff Court. 3. Gravel access pads to minimize tracking onto Rahn Cliff Court. 4. Stabilization of the slope along Pond AP -44.2. UTILITIES: Sanitary sewer service of sufficient capacity and depth to serve the Development is readily available from the existing sanitary sewer line in Rahn Cliff Court. Watermain service of sufficient capacity and pressure to serve this Development is readily available from the existing watermains in Rahn Road, Rahn Cliff Court, and from the existing 16" trunk watermain which crosses a site in the area of proposed Outlot B. STREETS /ACCESS /CIRCULATION: Improved public street access to serve the Development is readily available from Rahn Road and Rahn Cliff Court. A limited access (right in - right out) onto Cliff Road was constructed with the Rahn Cliff 1st Addition. The existing limited access presents traffic enforcement problems. This entrance will either required to be closed and all internal traffic circulation directed to Rahn Cliff Court, or the median in Cliff Road extended westerly to close the "attempted full access" maneuver which is presently causing traffic circulation enforcement problems along Cliff Road. All entrances into parking areas from public street right -of -way and all major internal parking lot driving aisles are required to be 30' wide. All internal parking lot major driving aisles are required to be 30' wide also. The proposed internal parking lot circulation maneuvers are subject a detail review by the City's traffic engineering consultant. X31 The City's traffic engineering consultant has reviewed the site plan for the proposed Rahn Cliff 2nd Addition. Based on the uses and the square footages of the buildings shown on the proposed site plan, approximately 7,750 trips on an average week day will result. Of this projected 7,750 trips per day, approximately 555 will be outbound and approximately 320 will be inbound in the evening rush hour. As a part of the analysis for the City of Eagan's Comprehensive Transportation Plan, it was assumed that there would be some retail development in the area and that it would probably generate approximately 2,400 vehicle trips per day. The Development as proposed is approximately 3 times the traffic generator as previously assumed. The additional daily traffic will put an additional burden on the intersection of Cliff and Rahn Road. Virtually all the traffic from the Development will utilitze the Cliff and Rahn Road intersection. Only about 200 vehicles per day are anticipated to use the existing right in -right out off of Cliff Road. The intersection of Rahn Road and Cliff Road is scheduled for reconstruction in 1988 as a result of the proposed Cliff Lake Centre Development. The additional traffic from the south will create capacity problems beyond what was originally anticipated in the proposed Cliff and Rahn Road intersection construction. EASEMENTS /RIGHTS - OF - WAY /PERMITS: The Dakota County Plat Commission met on May 23, 1988, to consider the preliminary plat of Rahn Cliff 2nd Addition. The plat is adjacent to County State Aid Highway #32 (Cliff Road) and is, therefore, subject to Dakota County Contiguous Plat Ordinance. After a review of the plat it was a concensus of opinion of the Plat Commission that said plat does agree with the provisions of the ordinance. Restricted access will be required to be rededicated on the final plat as per the Rahn Cliff 1st Addition. No additional right -of -way requirements are identified for Cliff Road, Rahn Road or Rahn Cliff Court. The Development is responsible for dedicating all appropriate cross easements for traffic circulation, utility easements for watermain, sanitary sewer and storm sewer as necessitated by depth, and the appropriate drainage and utility easement as required to accomodate the necessary storage volume for Pond AP- 44. All regulatory agency permits shall be acquired within the appropriate time frame as required by the affected agency. ASSESSMENTS A search of City records show that there are no pending assessments of record and the following assessments are proposed as a condition of final plat approval in accordance with City Special Assessment Policy No. 82 -1: �j Z PROJ # DESCRIPTION RATE QUANTITY AMOUNT 370 Lateral Benefit Storm Sewer $30.88 1,124 ff $34,709 254 Lateral Benefit Sanitary Sewer 15.85 559 ff 8,860 370 Water Service 1,012 316 Lateral Benefit Storm Sewer 61.75 844 if 52,117 316 Lateral Benefit Trunk Sanitary Sewer 6.08 528 f 3,210 Future Cliff Road 111.70 530 ff 59,201 Future Cliff Road Trailway 13.00 530 ff 6,890 TOTAL PROPOSED ASSESSMENT $165,999 All final assessment obligations will be calculated based on the quantities and dimensions on the final plat and in accordance with the rates in effect at the time of the final plat approval. h 33 RAHNCLIFF 2ND ADDITION CONDITIONS: 1. These standard conditions of plat approval as adopted by Council action on September 15, 1987 shall be complied with: Al, Bi, B2, B3, B4, Cl, C2, C4, C5, D1, El, F1, and G1. 2. A Planned Development Agreement shall be entered into for a period of five years. 3. Lot 2, block 1; lot 1, block 2; and lot 3, block 3 shall be approved at this time. All other lots and outlots will be reviewed by the Advisory Planning Commission and City Council. 4. All signage shall be subject to the one -time sign fee of $2.50 per square foot. The overall sign plan as shown on the site plan shall be approved. A 27'- maximum height shall be adhered to. 5. All trash shall be contained within the buildings except for the fast -food facility on lot 1, block 3. 6. Rooftop mechanical equipment shall not be visible from the adjacent roads or Highway 35E. 7. The building and parking setbacks shall be allowed as exhibited on the site plan dated May 16, 1988. 8. The Development is required to revise the proposed watermain design. The proposed design interconnects 2 different pressure zones. 9. The Development isrequired to limit phosphorus loadings to Cliff Lake to pre - development levels. 10. No direct connection to the existing 21" storm sewer along the south side of Cliff Road will be allowed. 11. No direct connection to the existing 18" storm sewer line along the westerly side of I -35E will be allowed. 12 . The Development is limited to approximately 10 CFS of storm water runoff which it can discharge directly into the existing 30" storm sewer which crosses Cliff Road at the northeasterly corner of the Development and flows into Pond AP -42. All remaining site generated runoff must be routed through Pond AP -44 prior to discharge into the existing City storm sewer system. 13. The Development will be responsible for rerouting the existing storm sewer system in Rahn Cliff Court which discharges into the existing 18" storm sewer along the westerly side of I -35E. The runoff from this area is required to drain into Pond AP -44. 14. No encroachment below the 918 high water elevation for Pond AP -44 will be allowed. /34z RAHNCLIFF 2ND ADDITION CONDITIONS: 15. All entrances into parking areas from public street right - of -way and all major internal parking lot driving aisles are required to be 30 feet wide minimum. 16. The Development is responsible for its proportionate share of any major roadway improvements as necessitated by the intensity of the proposed development as identified by the City and County. A. Assessments STANDARD CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL 1. This development shall accept its additional assessment obligations as defined in the staff's report in accordance with the final plat dimensions and the rates in effect at the time of final plat approval. B. Easements and Rights -of -Way 1. This development shall dedicate 10' drainage and utility easements centered over all common lot lines and adjacent to private property or public right -of -way. 2. This development shall dedicate, provide, or financially guarantee its proportionate share of the acquisition costs of additional drainage, ponding, and utility easements as required by the alignment, depth, and storage capacity of all required public utilities and streets located beyond the boundaries of this plat or outside of dedicated public right -of -way as necessary to service this development. 3. This development shall dedicate all public right -of -way and temporary slope easements for ultimate development of adjacent roadways as required by the appropriate jurisdictional agency. 4. This development shall dedicate adequate drainage and ponding easements to incorporate the required high water elevation necessitated by City storm water storage volume requirements. C. Plans and Specifications 1. All public streets and utilities necessary to provide service to this development shall be designed by a registered professional engineer in accordance with City codes and engineering standards and policies, and approved by staff prior to final plat approval. 2. A detailed grading, drainage, erosion, and sediment control plan must be prepared in accordance with current City standards and approved by staff prior to final plat approval. 3. This development shall insure that all temporary dead end public streets shall have a cul -de -sac constructed in accordance with City engineering standards. 4. A detailed landscape plan shall be submitted on the proposed grading plan and approved by staff prior to the final plat approval. The financial guarantee shall be included in the Development Contract and not released until one year after the date of installation. /3� STANDARD CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL PAGE TWO 5. All internal public and private streets shall be constructed within the required right -of -way in accordance with City design standards. D. Public Improvements 1. If any public improvements are to be installed under a City contract, the appropriate project must be approved by Council action prior to final plat approval. E. Permits 1. This development shall be responsible for the acquisition of all regulatory agency permits in the time frame required by the affected agency. F. Parks Dedication 1. This development shall fulfull its parks dedication requirements as recommended by the Advisory Parks and Recreation Commission and approved by Council action. G. Other 1. All standard platting and zoning conditions shall be adhered to unless specifically granted a variance by Council action. Advisory Planning Commission City Council Approved: August 25, 1987 September 15, 1987 Revised: LTS #2 STANDARD X31 [-At-ii7 1M: _1- i9] /5?' L . _ : •S‘ , -.".. ' A \ ' 9 i 2' I.. 7.1.C ‘‘\ \ -§ t ./// ,, ', lu 'i ----,p,'■, , s-,1 , __--...., . r - ,,,_.., .•,:._ , A NA; c T 4 / ....,- I , ,, , L , —.......— — ,_ < ,,l_ • ''" \ 1 .-• ,. : - : :_ '' 0 . . I ■ :/ ,r 0 CJ 1 mamma' • Uranr. c•arrrvr I / / /, F _ 3 4 �1'(or w r.4 ..v• s/ rK low N is*. &V 1/ S (. ") .. .9 ■ v9 ! E 1 9! ▪ (.. ) ao.00 w'a Ia L'J 0) c• 10 noon • 9sI•.r o.'r ;RAHNCLIFF r I9•.ICI r JO I %` I. " 20X vioroand CO. RD. ( CUFF ROAO) s RAHN CL%FF MOM 1 J2.2 w 19! fOOO MOC OO OUTLOT A V (0* OUTLOT O PARCEL 31 OUTLOT D �1 COUR ' , ,.,, Y Ir.Tbr - • 4 . Nt 0 i _' — ',i. fig• \ °a ~ / •• POW 00 OO FCIT • OF IMO NOITN LINE OF TI( N✓ OF Of TN( N01,* OF 19C.3I .N I / WATER SERVICE ' CLIFF ROAD FUTURE IMPROVEMENTS -- 530 F.F. • i. PARCEL 3! 111 I / (` 1 ', T. / 1 JL O c 1 S'd0A3A 4fS / S833NIDN3 / S2l3NNVld -DUI 1 sawPf / i s / e 4. / / / / \ 0 DO M Ol'50'24 [ o � a ° u • / / I I _ 0: 1' . 1- 1\ cn el 1 \ r Y \ Q M \ \ \ \. S \ \ o \ - 1:,. -(0, \ • .* I rY 1 1 \ °0 1 1 \ 1 I 2i 'ON 3 m r 0 J O 1Vld AEIVNIW113Hd lw ' NVOV1 NOIIIOOV ONZ ddIlONHVH `\ \ / 10.0N JAI131 ANN 01• • a O J r 0 iI003 LMOO] 4J113HN•a 1 • z 0 0 S MS 55'77 Y DO i l l 14 0 m I.1 II I 1 • 1J JJI I�NM�N J 0 11M00) I Ot .V4.01,041 M ■ DO 016 • 01/011 • 2,1113 2 02 r oo uf fq I Scial 111 col 1131! w t IT ni 1 PI U IsA rT TT rl 1 . 1 . •Slz.. . iiIiiittl. _ ---, — 1" ' r — — s-i - - — • - :J 1 1 r ,..' 1 ' -- — : .1 1 .1 r --, . i. ; - —....!___ —I.) ., 1 1 . -1 i . , 1 r - ---- - 1 I _.: .....4- - - ... I r r Iininiri --,,, I1.1.111.1111i11111 1 11111111. LL , -1-1- L.J-L 1-1.1_ •_J_L LLL 1-1-11-LJL_L-L 1-.1-L 1-1-1 LLL m .. ;ADM 011.1,41V s8a2Aans / S833NI9N3 / SIONNVid •••:t....4= r i3ININ I ..: r.. 11 • N S@LLIP1 I -`-z- 1 '"'""'! 3 .. 'furore VZIrld Ad113NRY/1 : :N1r1;r1IS‘ • • -:-.-.=7. U - DUI • A.m. OMM NOUVIVOSSV 1VNOISS3A08.1 SI.D311HOuv PRIXILOP LB • • • CM111/11111011- RavNwiii3dd - _- 2 _ .4 r. Oita 1I!1 1 • 1 gS!1 1 ▪ it 1 1 — Es! • .-. - ---.....*: ....- -- ' . - iiiiiiisisMi . T:' -....:. - - -... •--- . •.. - ' 77". 7'7 .ig ..- - •.. . -.- - - ' -: - elliss311 z ›- 0. N 0. - N �r N , • 1111- 11'fl l 1 Fanti _ITI"'ki 1 1' 1 I I I 1 1 1 `, l I col 'mid 1 A Ni O' rI ; \ IIII VIII 111 xd11111HI N �. - 1 3. km IS a���11Ny /:..7.3∎SNJ -•-� _ t�•7 NVId 101:11NO3 1N0� NOISOli3 'P JNIUVH a 9 AvNIW11373d) e ✓U! 111!1 1 u [`dW •21 J [ � w wvorN d o � ,l ¢: II ( vrIld AJI1ONHVH 9� ? 3! • q• g u: ai �r :a :ail 3 it 13 3:1: Is. :is . iiialiaiIiicIii I :- a! 3 HIS 7 : ' S . t d f 1-,1$1. ] r 3 - 1 a �. : ! 1 .. 5 1212 .188. 133: yii iisiiii ii WHIM! tl III VIII +I II It IL '' 1 I III1i IIIu -- =, 4- -I 0,1111 IIII I�IIIll mil Y Sa0A3A21f1S / S2133NI9N3 / S2l3NNVid - DUI 111H - I sGUJUI • 5 F. 2 iaa - Iii • 4' 4 1�3 aims Nusnr •n NVid Alllllll AHVNIIN1131:1d Mn '.VOV1 VZVld ddllONHVH YYYYYYYY�Y 1 aiiiaa DOOM 44113 s 09'55 DO N _ , 1* L. ° e O us n W \0 or us v E � rti , Y u 1.-* 1 r W 20 cc ;20 ( J 3 r' W��j S' eg W +j ;X ✓ cr. ■• O S U . of Xm Sm l f a • • • t ip! 1 qax� m i. AIVUIL I1 dd r Z ~ tFt S� 1 S t� t � 0 f l Q N d6 Z • 6 i V J 1 a \ r C 0 i c1 ti on C; .J N O z 0 z • H71 B L O C ,"Ct JO •t — O a) soo LOT 1 . 1 • 1� r sr,rOP ia000 RAHNCLIFf COURTg • sr, r'otr paa 0.2000 Ys0•OO'o0* rear OUTLOT 2RAHNCLIFF .,,,,,, a. •0 �y S W a OUTLOT A SJLM ..,3•111 COURT. ar aINYt • Villa asarYLNr, o or n,r.arw Or Mr N.w IJ}LC. K/ // R I III fl - -3• .rA 0 �4 v o4 c 2 o •_ i -% CO RD ( CUFF ROAD) m in r 110.00 10 )0 PARCEL 3T 1111/ MI MI 111111 its 614= 01:._ rover w rltT s'l• or rK 1I0010 CIN! Of THE NV /.Or 100 Nr'I /s Or NC. JS I OUTLOT D O 1 , ..as fic �Fq -.I 17. P4 RC E l .t.••■•• LATERAL BENEFIT — STORM SEWER- 1 124 F.F. r LATERAL BENEFIT TRUNK FOR SAN. SEWER - 559 F.F. / �7 31 00 . u0 j r ✓r'ah �' bs Ott -27 J , r _ I. xa N !i CJ LY LL CJ r E r') ( j L'J U c L IJ •! • • 0 0 s RAHN'I L.lPfr l,•a■ — 3U! ••10.0.3 ••oroo'oo Q � RAHNCL/FF COURT :: , .. r!••rT' 'II PI? V7• - 11 • 7 /WO A* •0•0000" OUTLOT A #V OUTLOT Y •••••• • UTILITY [Y[•NT,,, 1 Q or d M —w or nt —w 1114c. 1. 2 4 U IltlII(I IIIIIII 111 • { c / /Sb / °ur • • \•y J Tn N n or '4 4. • • c 01 CO. RD. ( CUFF ROAD) t I 3• 4 irnr •p(lgN4f[0 • LOT B L O C K NH'IT'0rr !v!• - ; oovv ht r �. t. Ill 1/0.00 rt( l3 P•eCCL 71 `� \7'70• x S • •0•I 00 00 7(17 • LY OF TK NONTN LIME 07 74( NY IN OF /N( NW II• OF NC.!! OUTLOT O /� 7/ q. n WI/ N 03.•4 None 54't 4' 1.4 la 3 7. l• 114 OII -2? - ••- -■ CLIFF ROAD - TRAIL -• 530 F.F. -.:- ;:,TarcI LATERAL BENEFIT FOR STORM SEWER F.F. 1111 ll m LATERAL BENEFIT FOR S/A t,$ ITARY SEWER -528 F.F. • PARCEL 53 0 111 1 In 'C`r' •• 1 4 7 J1. SANITARY SEWER MASTER PLAN approved: 1 r-LO P-50 $88- - 186.0 /./ 89.5.0 94. d7---7, , 9/9•3 • \ r•.1 RPCF A • :_922;0 926; coo' SA SA , - f r / 1. , 1 121 j n - AP7 - 4 H \ • vid• c • A-xx r cii1R-(i'ci3Ar, 1_, 11 1 111.111 ._ 41.1.1.° thE3P-31T ,,a-0 1935.0 t 9376 . ' -' ' , • "7_ vivii AD. ,.--■-- , 1 7 I AP-17N\(— '?..; 926.0 1 \ DAKOTA I COUNTY „,...,....A-yy _zz 1 •-• ) BP -1933.9;' Fi,105 4•41. () ti • ' A y 47 i . 9j,13.3” no AD ,,, r , LP-59 r 89 3 . 3 900.0 SUBJECT PARCEL L N 887 s (v . 897- \\ FIG#1 city of eagan r„, _--7.1 PUBLIC CZ,I, WORKS DE PARTMEN STORM SEWER MASTER PLAN 1 approved : standard plate #: 2 4-1 (6p Page 17 /PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES June 28, 1988 Voracek stated he felt the Commission should give directions to the Council as to why the motion failed. Voracek moved, Garry seconded, the motion to deny the preliminary plat of 1.91 CSC zoned acres and a conditional use permit to allow a car wash facility ana motor fuel sales and a variance for a canopy setback located on a portion of existing Outlot B, Town Centre 70 First Addition or proposed Outlot A, Town Centre 70 Ninth Addition located between Highway 35E and Town Centre Drive in the northwest quarter of Section 15. Member Garry withdrew his second of the motion. Wilkins seconded the motion. Garry, Pawlenty, Merkley ana Graves voted in favor; Voracek, Wilkins, and Trygg voted against. AUSTIN COMPANIES - RAHNCLIFF SECOND ADDITION Chairman Pawlenty then opened the next public hearing regarding the request for a comprehensive guide plan amendment, a rezoning of 16.08 LB (limited business) and RB (roadside business) acres to a commercial planned development district and a preliminary plat located at the southwest intersection of Cliff Road and Highway 35E in the northwest quarter of Section 32. Assistant City Planner Sturm informed the Commission the proposed site is located between Rahn Road and Highway 35E along the south side of Cliff Road. The uses proposed for this development are consistent with the existing zoning districts. The planned development zoning allows the City the opportunity to review the overall development at this time as opposed to individual requests on each lot. Architectural landscaping and signage compatability will be addressed with this plat. He stated even though the uses are consistent with the existing commercial zoning, a comprehensive guide plan amendment would be necessary. Mr. Sturm stated the site is very flat and highly visible from Highway 35E and there is no significant vegetation for the City to be concerned with. Access will primarily be from previously constructed RahnCliff Court with two secondary drives connecting to Rahn Road. Shared parking areas provide 832 stalls, which is well above the amount required by code. Code requires 730 to 815 stalls. Mr. Sturm updated the Commission as to the breakdown of each proposed area and their proposed use. Mr. Sturm stated the applicants had been very cooperative in working with them regarding the project. He statea all building and parking setbacks meet code requirements except for the 10 -toot drive lane setback along Cliff Road, the 17 -foot parking setback along Highway 35E and the 30 -foot building setback along the highway for the office building. No separate action was necessary for these deviations if the site plans are approved due to the planned development zoning. /57 Page 18 /PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES June 28, 1988 Mr. Sturm informed the Commission the landscape plan is very complete and screens the parking area nicely. He stated the overall landscape plan for the 16 acres is very well done. The plant material selection, proposed spacing, and quantities will visually tie the development together. Additionally, evergreens will be added along the highway to provide year -round color. Assistant Planner Sturm noted the buildings would be constructed on all sides with light and dark brick, accented with rock -faced block or stucco and metal canopies. The design plan as submitted requested two 30 -foot tall development signs located at the entry points along Cliff and Rahn Roads and six 7 -foot tall monument signs located throughout the site. The signs are architecturally compatible with each other as well as with the buildings. However, Mr. Sturm felt they should be reduced to the 27 -foot maximum height allowed by code. Individual tenant pylon signs have been proposed in three locations. Mark Smith, representative of Austin Companies, stated the current known users are Burger King, Pier I, and Drovers Bank. He further stated the extensive landscape plan properly screens the buildings from 35E. He stated the architectural design allows for canvas awnings across all rear exit doors to echo the front of the building. He stated the buildings will be all brick construction and the brick and mortar will be the same on each building. The brick will be of earthtone shades. Mr. Smith presented samples of the brick to the Commission. Mr. Smith stated there will be sign bans on the building for the tenants and they will not be located on the pylon sign itself. He stated the same vendor for the sign bans will be used so that the signs are uniform. Mr. Smith stated the pylon sign will be a maximum in height of 27 feet and they request the sign be erected at Cliff and 35E. Mr. Graves asked if the sign was to be visible from 35E. Mr. Smith stated that was their request so it would be more visible to the public. Member Trygg addressed the problem regarding the existing limited access to the development and asked whose decision this would be. Mr. Foertsch stated the City can make a recommendation to the County. Ray Williams, Astleford, stated that in a settlement with the County, the developer had a right to the right -in /right -out access. Member Wilkins asked if there would be a median in Cliff Road all the way down the roadway. Mr. Foertsch stated that was in the plans but it is not known when it would be added. Member Voracek requested the City staff to explain in greater detail their concern regarding the phosphorus loading to Cliff Lake. Page 19 /PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES June 28, 1988 Mr. Sturm reviewed staffs' concerns and the options regarding this matter. He further stated that proposed condition number 9 deals with the problem. Mr. Garry asked if the grading, drainage and erosion concerns are dealt with in the proposea conditions. Mr. Sturm stated that condition C2 of the standard conditions for plat approval deals with this question. Member Voracek was concerned about the future traffic and the potential of a dangerous intersection at Cliff and Rahn Roads. The City traffic engineer consultant, Glen VanWormer, stated there will be a traffic congestion problem at this intersection if the development in the area continues at a rapid pace. If the development in the area is phased in stages, the intersection should be able to handle the traffic with continued road upgrades. He stated the RahnCliff Development would create a little more traffic in the area than expected. Member Wilkins asked what the total square footage of the retail business would be for the facilities and if a bank is considered retail. Mr. Sturm stated banks are shown as specific use under the limited business zoning. He further stated there would be 75,000 square feet of total retail space. Wilkins asked if 11 acres of the proposed development would be roadside business. Mr. Sturm stated she was correct. Member Wilkins asked if they were requesting a rezoning of anything that was not currently on the Eagan Code books. She stated Eagan does not have a commercial planned development district. Mr. Sturm stated the City does have a planned development district and that the word "commercial" was only used to be more specific. He stated this is a planned development district. Chairman Pawlenty asked member Wilkins if she would prefer the word "commercial" be deleted. Member Wilkins stated she would prefer it be called planned development district. She further stated she feels there is too much commercial construction in Eagan. Polls had been taken of the residents and the residents felt they did not want more commercial development in .Eagan at this time. Wilkins further stated she feels LB zoning should not be for retail development. Commission member Graves stated all LB and RB zoning for this development would be put together as a planned development agreement. He stated this is for the City's own good as they can direct the development in the direction they want the development to move. City Attorney James Sheldon stated the Commission should consider adding a condition regarding access and cross parking Easements to be approved by the City. Mr. Merkley stated he felt the proposal was very presentable and it definitely showed quality development. He is concerned about the traffic strain on the thoroughfare system. Chairman Pawlenty also /3'3 Page 20 /PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES June 28, 1988 stated he is also concerned about the traffic congestion. He also stated it was a nice presentation by the developer and the Commission appreciated its thoroughness. Mr. Graves stated he felt the planned development district is to the City's advantage and offers greater consistency in the area. However, he was concerned about the transportation plan and the new development standards which will be discussed later at the meeting. He stated he was in favor of the planned development district; however, he felt the Commission should hold off on the preliminary plat approval until further information regarding the transportation plan and the new development standards had been discussed and reviewed. Chairman Pawlenty questioned when the commercial study would be completed. City Planner Dale Runkle stated it was hopeful within the next 30 days. Member Wilkins noted that there was a joint meeting scheduled with the Council and the Planning Commission and asked if the survey results could be reviewed at that time. Mr. Runkle stated there would be a joint meeting in July and the survey could and would be discussed if the survey was completed. Mr. Garry stated this project is quality construction and is what the Commission has looked for and wanted in aevelopment projects. He stated there is the potential traffic problem and suggested asking the County for their assistance. Ray Williams stated that the 22 acres was originally all RB zoning and a portion of the property was previously rezoned to LB as a buffer to the residential areas. Member Garry asked for an explanation between RB and LB zoning. Mr. Sturm stated LB zoning was commercial zoning and RB was transient such as large service stations. The developer informed the Commission that a lot of thought had gone into the development layout regarding the RB and LB zoning. Chairman Pawlenty asked Mr. Williams to update the Commission on the background of the area. Mr. Williams discussed the background of the property and further stated that the streets and utilities had been installed. The developer had been working on the project for four years and had definite plans for the area. Chairman Pawlenty stated the development was a quality development and it was a good location for the development; however, he felt there were concerns the Commission needed to address. Member Garry stated there was no public opposition at the meeting and consequently apparently no public concerns regarding the development. Page 21 /PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES June 28, 1988 Mr. Voracek suggested the decrease of the amount of the parking stalls for the area since Mr. Sturm had stated 832 stalls for parking would be in excess of what was needed. He suggested putting in additional green space instead of additional parking space. He felt this was a suggestion to the developer only and it was not necessary to add his suggestion as a condition. The developer stated he would have no problem removing more parking stalls. Graves moved, Voracek seconded, the motion to approve the rezoning of 16.08 LB (limited business) and RB (roadside business) acres to a planned development district. Pawlenty, Garry, Voracek, Trygg, Merkley and Graves voted in favor; Wilkins voted against. Member Wilkins stated she opposed the approval of the rezoning at that time because she felt the approval should have waited for the commercial study results. She further stated she was against the rezoning of roadside to retail as she felt there was enough commercial development in the City of Eagan at this time. Trygg moved, Garry seconded, the motion to approve the comprehensive guide plan amendment of 16.08 limited business and roadside business acres. Pawlenty, Garry, Voracek, Trygg, Merkley and Graves voted in favor; Wilkins voted against. Trygg moved, Garry seconded, the motion to approve the preliminary plat located at the southwest intersection of Cliff Road and Highway 35E in the northwest quarter of Section 32, subject to the following conditions: 1. These standard conditions of plat approval as adopted by Council action on September 15, 1987 shall be complied with: Al, Bl, B2, B3, B4, Cl, C2, C4, C5, D1, El, Fl, and Gl . 2. A Planned Development Agreement shall be entered into for a period of five years. 3. Lot Two. (2) , Block One (1) ; Lot One (1) , Block Two (2) ; and Lot Three (3), Block Three (3) shall be approved at this time. All other lots and outlots will be reviewed by the Advisory Planning Commission and City Council. 4. All signage shall be subject to the one -time signage fee of $2.50 per square foot. The overall sign plan as shown on the site plan shall be approved. A 27 foot maximum height shall be adhered to. 5. All trash shall be contained within the buildings except for the fast -food facility on Lot One (1) , Block Three (3) . 6. Rooftop mechanical equipment shall not be visible from the adjacent roads or Highway 35E. /5 Page 22 /PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES June 28, 1988 7. The building and parking setbacks shall be allowed as exhibited on the site plan dated May 16, 1988. 8. The development is required to revise the proposed watermain design. The proposed design interconnects two different pressure zones. 9. The development is required to limit phosphorus loadings to Cliff Lake to pre - development levels. 10. No direct connection to the existing 21 inch storm sewer along the south side of Cliff Road will be allowed. 11. No direct connection to the existing 18 inch storm sewer line along the westerly side of I -35E will be allowed. 12. The development is limited to approximately 10 CFS of storm water runoff which it can discharge directly into the existing 30 inch storm sewer which crosses Cliff Road at the northeasterly corner of the development and flows into Pond AP-42. All remaining site generated runoff must be routed through Pond AP-44 prior to discharge into the existing City storm sewer system. 13. The development will be responsible for rerouting the existing storm sewer system in Rahn Cliff Court which discharges into the existing 18 inch storm sewer along the westerly side of I -35E. The runoff from this area is required to drain into Pond AP -44. 14. No encroachment below the 918 high water elevation for Pond AP-44 will be allowed. 15. All entrances into parking areas from public street right -of -way and all major internal parking lot driving aisles are required to be 30 feet wide minimum. 16. The development is responsible for its proportionate share of any major roadway improvements as necessitated by the intensity of the proposed development as identified by the City and County. 17. Access and cross - parking easements shall be approved by the City. 18." City staff to request County review of the Cliff and Rahn Road intersections regarding future traffic congestion. Pawlenty, Garry, Voracek, Trygg, Merkley and Graves voted in favor; Wilkins voted against. Mr. Voracek asked if the PD would address the sign issues. Mr. Sturms stated it was in the signage plan. / 5,6 Agenda Information Memo July 19, 1988, City Council Meeting AD HOC SENIOR HOUSING SITE SELECTION COMMITTEE G. Appointment of Ad Hoc Senior Housing Site Selection Committee - -At a special joint workshop meeting of the City Council and Advisory Planning Commission authorization was given by the City Council to establish an ad hoc senior housing site selection committee for the purpose of reviewing five (5) sites that the City is considering for acquisition to construct a senior housing project in future years. For a copy of the objective, committee make ,tip and timing for the aforementioned committee, refer to page The Eagan senior citizens group meets monthly and their noon luncheon was Wednesday, July 13. Tom Lovelace, the planning intern, and our recreation coordinator, Dorothy Peterson, addressed the group and four (4) persons in attendance volunteered to serve on the committee. Please refer to the attached memo enclosed on page /6 for those names. In addition to those persons, Doris Wilking and Gary Graves have been designated by Chairperson Pawlenty to serve as representatives from the Advisory Planning Commission. Please consider some names and bring your suggestions for consideration at the City Council meeting on Tuesday. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To appoint an ad hoc senior housing site selection committee. AD HOC SENIOR HOUSING SITE SELECTION COMMITTEE Obi ect ives An ad hoc committee was appointed by the City Council at a special meeting held on Tuesday, July 12, 1988 for the sole purpose of reviewing five (5) sites the City is considering for acquisition to construct a senior housing project in future years. Numerous sites have been studied and reviewed by the City's Planning Department and in official action at the July 12th meeting the Planning Commission and City Council reduced the sites to five (5) locations. The City Council would appreciate a recommendation by the ad hoc committee of two (2) sites at which time the Council will authorize appraisals and consider acquisition. Committee Make -Up The committee is to be made up of: Two (2) Advisory Planning Commission members Four (4) senior citizens who are Eagan residents selected from the organized senior citizens group Four (4) residents at large appointed by the Mayor and City Council Staff - this committee will be staffed by the City Planner and his department Timing The City Council is anticipating two to three meetings with findings presented in early to mid - september. TO: Tom Hedges,City Administrator FROM: Tom Lovelace,Planning Intern DATE: July 13,1988 SUBJECT: Senior Housing Project Site Committee Attached is a list of 4 names and their addresses of senior citizens who have volunteered to sit on the Senior Housing Project Site Committee. 1. Mr. Jules J. Bernier 3155 Coachman Rd. Eagan,MN 55121 2. Ms. Florence Mullen 1293 Easter Lane Eagan,MN 55123 3. Mr. Eldon Oberg 3535 Elrene Rd. Eagan,MN 55121 4. Mr. Bill Reid 3255 Coachman Rd. #330 Eagan,MN 55121 MEMORANDUM MEMO TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCILMEMBERS FROM: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES DATE: JULY 15, 1988 SUBJECT: INFORMATIVE SPEED STUDY ON BLACKHAWK ROAD Enclosed on page /'L through for City Council review is a memo from the police department regarding a speed study on Blackhawk Road. At the June 21 City Council meeting a direction was given to the police department to conduct a speed survey as a result of a petition for stop signs at Blackhawk Road and Deerwood Drive and Silverbell Road. PROTECTIVE INSPECTIONS MONTHLY REPORT Enclosed on pages /C3 through /66 is the June 1988 Protective Inspections monthly report. TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT GUIDE /POLICY PLAN COMMENTS The Director of Public Works has prepared a response to the Metropolitan Council's draft Transportation Development Guide /Policy Plan and a copy of that response is enclosed on pages/ through /70 for your review. UPDATE DISTRICT 196 FOR THE DAKOTA HILLS MIDDLE SCHOOL /EAGAN HIGH SCHOOL FACILITY Enclosed on pages /7/ through /7Z a copy of a letter from Dr. Wilson that provid s an update /on the status of the Dakota Hills Middle School /Eagan High School facility project. SPRINGSTED Enclosed on pages j7 through 17 is a copy of a letter sent to Springsted by the City Administrator and a letter from their chief executive officer expressing their excitement at having been selected the City's fiscal consultant. HRA UPDATE Enclosed on pages 17; through (74 is the June 1988 update for the Dakota County HRA assisted housing community development. MLC At the July 6, 1988 MLC Board of Directors meeting, action was taken to initiate a lawsuit challenging the constitutionality of the Disparity Aid Section of the 1988 Omnibus Tax Bill, subject to finding a plaintiff. That motion passed by a vote of 15 to 1. Enclosed on pages ' l through /, f is a copy of the Operating Committee minutes nd Board of Directors minutes. The Association of Metropolitan Municipalities Board of Directors voted last week to participate in the MLC property tax lawsuit and authorized an expenditure of up to $5,000.00 to help directly to underwrite the cost of the lawsuit or to prepare an amicus curiae brief. COMMUNITY CENTER UPDATE Enclosed on pages /- through /r3 is a copy of a memo to file regarding the summary meeting with architects from Hastings and Chivetta regarding their two -day charette for our proposed community center. BERRY PATCH PARK /MOONEY LAKE ELEVATION NEIGHBORHOOD MEETINGS Berry Patch Park / Mooney Lake Elevation, Neighborhood Meetings.- - On May 24th and July 14th, neighborhood meetings were held with the riparian property owners from Hilltop Estates and Chatterton Ponds regarding the lower elevation of Mooney Lake (Pond JP -7) located within Berry Patch Park resulting from the installation of the storm sewer lift station outlet under Project 473. These meetings were initiated by growing concerns and complaints from these property owners regarding the impact on this water body associated with this lower elevation. Enclosed on page.S is a memo from the Public Works Director providing background information, concerns expressed and possible further involvement resulting from these neighborhood meetings and discussions. This information is to keep the Council informed of a significant neighborhood issue that may involve the Council individually through personal contact or formally as a future Council agenda item. If you would like further input regarding these issues, the City Administrator would be happy to coordinate additional discussion and explanation whenever appropriate. /S/ Thomas L. Hedges City Administrator /6/ police department JAY M. BERTHE Chief of Police PATRICK J. GEAGAN Administrative Captain city of eagan K D ASZMANN Operations Captain 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, Minnesota 55122 Phone: (612) 454 -3900 July 8, 1988 TO: CHIEF BERTHE FROM: CAPTAIN ASZMANN SUBJECT: SPEED ON BLACKHAWK ROAD Per Council request of June 21st, we have done extensive traffic surveys on Blackhawk Road. The results indicate quite a large volume of traffic. The majority are traveling the speed limit or slightly over, however, several cars were traveling well in excess of the speed limit, which indicates that patrol should spend time with radar to get speed limit compliance. This information has been passed on to the sergeants. Ken Asmann Operations Captain KDA /lb THE LONE OAK TREE ... THE SYMBOL OF STRENGTH AND GROWTH IN OUR COMMUNITY VIC ELLISON Mayor THOMAS EGAN DAVID K. GUSTAFSON PAMELA McCREA THEODORE WACHTER Council Members THOMAS HEDGES City Administrator EUGENE VAN OVERBEKE City Clerk NUMBER OF PERMITS ISSUED Electrical Plumbing HVAC Water Softener Signs Well, Cesspool, Septic Tank YTD PROTECTIVE INSPECTIONS MONTHLY REPORT THIS MONTH YEAR -TO -DATE 190 772 102 479 207 9 30 0 JUNE 1988 NATURE OF BUILDING PERMITS ISSUED MONTHLY / 3 634 54 77 4 TYPE NU. VALUATION FthMll ttt WLAN cttV ttt LUTAL rnnO 9 ii , FOUNDATION I 4 1 $ $ 339.00 $ 339.00 359 SINGLE FAMILY 93 ;10,256,000.00 55,930.00$ 27,965.00 254,583.50 22 DUPLEX 6 355,000.001 2,464.001 1,232.00 14,651.50 34 TOWNHOUSE 3 348,000.001 1,878.001 939.00 8,379.00 4 CONDO 0 0 APT BLDGS 0 1 0 LAGRICULTURAL 0 ! 1 8 1COMMERCIAL 4 5,011,000.00 15,014.001 7,507.00 123,514.00 38 1COMM /IND REMODEL 7 380,000.00 2,336.00 1,081.00 3,607.00 I 1 1 COMM /IND ADDITION 0 2 INDUSTRIAL 2 I 102,000.00 756.00 378.00 4,672.50 0 (INSTITUTIONAL 0 3 PUBLIC FACILITIES 1 i 68,000.00 34.00 7 RES. GARAGES 2 25,000.00 252.00 93.00 357.50 31 RES. ADDITIONS 4 75,000.00 694.00 347.00 1,078.50 22 SWIM POOL 12 130,000.00 1,352.00 353.00 1,772.00 200 MISCELLANEOUS 50 114,700.00 1,822.00 119.00 2,011.50 1 DEMOLISH 0 } 2 HOUSE MOVES 1 30.001 30.00 743 MO. TOTALS 189 16,864,700.00 82,867.001 40,014.00 415,030.00 - 1 ONE S.F. ADJUSTMENTS ON S.F. - 72.001 - 36.001 - 117.50 742 YEAR -T0-DATE 55,111,667.00 288,895.001 138,191.5 1,361,416.10 NUMBER OF PERMITS ISSUED Electrical Plumbing HVAC Water Softener Signs Well, Cesspool, Septic Tank YTD PROTECTIVE INSPECTIONS MONTHLY REPORT THIS MONTH YEAR -TO -DATE 190 772 102 479 207 9 30 0 JUNE 1988 NATURE OF BUILDING PERMITS ISSUED MONTHLY / 3 634 54 77 4 BLDG. 1 1 PERMIT # 1 ADDRESS & LEGAL 1 OWNER 1 4870 BISCAYNE AVE 1 15243 1 L3, B2, HALLEY'S 1ST 1 JOHN J. YOUNG '4880 BISCAYNE AVE 1 L2, B2, HALLEY'S 1ST '3800 TESSERACT PLACE 'EDUCATION 1 L1, B1, MICHAEL R SILL ADD 'ALTERNATIVES 15287 1 1940 CLIFF LAKE RD 1 L1, BI, CLIFF LAKE CTR ICUB FOODS 1 15152 15214 1 2905 LEXINGTON AVE ' 1 15231 1 L1, B1, EAG CTR IND PK #10 ' PAYLESS CASHWAYS $ 15103 1 3985 CEDARVIEW DR " 'SUPERIOR COLLISION 'L1, B1, BARTON MCGRAY 1 & PAINT 15271 1030 LONE OAK RD ' OPUS CORP IL10 -13, B5, EAG CTR IND PK31 1 15254 15221 15219 15210 15196 15190 15093 1 2900 LONE OAK PKWY 'L1, B1, BLUE RIDGE 13460 WASHINGTON DR IL1, B2, BICENTENNIAL 7TH 1 1308 TOWN CENTRE DR 1 L2, B1, TOWN CTR 70 2ND 1 3370 COACHMAN RD •L2, B1, BBD 2ND ADD 1 1306 TOWN CENTRE DR 11,2, B1, TOWN CTR 70 2ND 1 3914 SIBLEY MEMORIAL HWY 1 L051, B6, SECT. 19 1 3501 COACHMAN RD 1 L1, B28, SECT 16 1 1 1 1 1 1 • • 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 PROTECTIVE INSPECTIONS MONTHLY REPORT COMMERCIAL /INDUSTRIAL & INSTITUTIONAL BREAKDOWNS DATE JUNE 1988 1 •A.E. LAURENT 1 WACHOVIA BANK & ' TRUST 1 ( FEDERAL LAND CO 1 •FEDERAL LAND CO 1 •BBD INVESTMENTS 1 'FEDERAL LAND CO 'UPPER MIDWEST 'MANAGEMENT CORP 1 •CITY OF EAGAN 1 1 1 1 1 1 $ 1 1 1 1 1 $ 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 VALUATION 1 1$ 50,000 1 1 1 1 $ 1 1 1 1 $ 1 1 1 1 $ 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 • 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 52,000 950,000 2,100,000 1,661,000 4,000 5,000 3,000 95,000 68,000 1 1 OCCUP. 1 1 IND. NEW 1 1 IND. NEW 1 COMM. NEW 1 I COMM. NEW 1 1 COMM. NEW 1 300,000 1 COMM. NEW 108,000 COMM. IMPR. 1 85,000 1 COMM. IMPR. 1 COMM. IMPR. 1 • COMM. IMPR. 1 80,000 1 COMM. IMPR. 1 • COMM. IMPR. 1 • COMM. IMPR. 1 • PUB. FACILITY 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 • 1 1 1 1 1 1 TYPE MO. # OF PERMITS MO. # OF BUILDINGS YTD # OF BUILDINGS MO. # OF UNITS YTD. # OF UNITS # OF PERMITS VOIDED # OF UNITS MOVED IN DUPLEX 6 3 11 6 22 3 -PLEX 3 3 3 3 3 4 -PLEX 10 40 5 -PLEX 6-PLFY 2 12 7 -PI,EX 8 -PLEX 10 -PLEX 12 -PLEX 16 -PLEX APT. BLDG. OTHER TOTAL: j 9 6 26 9 77 PROTECTIVE INSPECTIONS - MONTHLY REPORT DATE JUNE 1988 MULTI -F mmMBER OF PERMITS ISSUED ?lectrical Plumbing iVAC 'later Softener Signs 'lell, Cesspool, Septic Tank YTD PROTECTIVE INSPECTIONS MONTHLY REPORT - MONTHLY THIS MONTH YEAR -TO -DATE 174 1,044 87 123 5 27 2 JUNE 1987 NATURE OF BUILDING PERMITS ISSUED 636 754 75 71 3 TYPE NO. VALUATION PERMIT FEE PLAN REV FEE TOTAL FEES 3 FOUNDATION 1 $ 15.00 $ , 15.00 354 SINGLE FAMILY 62 6,725,500 32,484.00 16,242.00 155,363.00 34 DUPLEX 4 243,000 1,464.50 732.25 9,126.25 79 TOWNHOUSE 8 508,000 3,006.00 1,503.00 18,379.00 3 CONDO 0 4 APT BLDGS 0 0 AGRICULTURAL 0 19 COMMERCIAL 8 4,302,000 11,078.70 5,539.35 94,726.05 59 COMM /IND REMODEL 7 210,100 1,411.30 619.30 2,136.10 3 COMM /IND ADDITION 1 70,000 398.50 199.25 632.75 0 INDUSTRIAL 0 0 INSTITUTIONAL 0 1 PUBLIC FACILITIES 0 23 RES. GARAGES 5 27,200 313.50 327.50 20 RES. ADDITIONS 3 42,800 378.50 142.50 543.00 10 SWIM POOL 4 34,500 329.00 107.50 454.00 154 MISCELLANEOUS 45 338,260 2,909.90 310.75 3,394.65 2 DEMOLISH 1 15.00 15.00 1 HOUSE MOVES 0 1 ADJUSTMENTS 774, TOTALS 149 12,501,360 53,803.90 25,395.90 285,112.30 YEAR -TO -DATE 80,487,719 334,278.85 161,772.60 1,849,468.45 /6 ‘ I mmMBER OF PERMITS ISSUED ?lectrical Plumbing iVAC 'later Softener Signs 'lell, Cesspool, Septic Tank YTD PROTECTIVE INSPECTIONS MONTHLY REPORT - MONTHLY THIS MONTH YEAR -TO -DATE 174 1,044 87 123 5 27 2 JUNE 1987 NATURE OF BUILDING PERMITS ISSUED 636 754 75 71 3 X19 r � �:Ki ' city ®F catkin 3830 PILOT KNOB ROAD, P.O BOX 21199 EAGAN, MINNESOTA 55121 PHONE (612) 454 -8100 JULY 5, 1988 MR. STEVE KEEFE, CHAIR. METROPOLITAN COUNCIL 300 METRO SQUARE BUILDING ST. PAUL, MN. 55101 RE: Transportation Development Guide Policy Plan Comments Dear Mr. Keefe: The City of Eagan thanks you for an opportunity to comment on Metropolitan Council's draft Transportation Development Guide /Policy Plan. It is evident that a considerable amount of thought and effort has been spent formulating the Plan. Eagan is particularly interested in this effort since it is currently completing a Comprehensive Transportation Plan. Although our Transportation Plan is still in the forecasting and analysis phase, we believe that some of our preliminary findings could assist you in achieving a clearer view of Eagan's anticipated transportation needs. EXISTING TRANSPORTATION PLANNING EFFORTS One of the primary reasons Eagan has initiated a Comprehensive Transportation Plan is directly related to the inability of the metropolitan planning process to accurately gauge the rate or intensity of development. While Eagan's current Comprehensive Land Use Plan has been submitted to and reviewed by Met Council, the Metropolitan Council traffic forecasts have been derived from other data sources. This translation of the Land Use Plans to socio - economic data by Met Council is a probable source of "unanticipated growth" mentioned in the Guide Plan. There needs to be a process of agreement between Met Council and other jurisdictions regarding quantifiable data sources. THE LONE OAK TREE THE SYMBOL OF STRENGTH AND GROWTH IN OUR COMMUNITY VIC ELLISON Mayor THOMAS EGAN DAVID K. GUSTAFSON PAMELA MCCPEA THEODORE WACHTER Council Members THOMAS HEDGES City Administrator EUGENE VAN OVERBEKE City Clerk /6 7 Mr. Steve Keefe Page Two July 5, 1988 Eagan believes that in order to adequately address its needs within a metropolitan transportation framework, the current planning efforts should consider a number of existing shortcomings: Future forecasting efforts must be more closely related to land use types and intensities rather than to estimates of socio- economic data. Eagan maintains extensive information regarding existing and future projected land uses. The potential mitigating measures of Transit and Travel Demand Management require additional research and quantification. While Met Council has done a good job of providing outside experts to discuss other cities' efforts in this area, more in -depth review of these experiences is needed to quantify any expected improvements. There does not appear to be a sufficient understanding of the dynamics of metropolitan development as it occurs in Eagan and adjacent areas. The metropolitan mix of land uses can reduce or increase demands placed on the transportation system. Are current development patterns promoting shorter or longer trips? Is there information concerning the type of housing being provided versus the types of jobs being created? What types of development patterns could enhance the design life of our transportation system? Certain ramifications potentially exist when Met Council evaluates the metropolitan highway system on a five year basis. On -going development creates additional travel demands which are not apparent when comparing to typical census data. An understanding of incremental development trends is needed to be able to adequately evaluate the transportation system. The planning process and its credibility is extremely important. If alternative funding methods (i.e. impact fees), are used for roadway improvements, all steps in the analysis must be understandable and open for review. Further, Met Council's planning process and the City's process must be coordinated to ensure consistent and reasonable answers during evaluations. 168 Mr. Steve Keefe Page Three July 5, 1988 METROPOLITAN SIGNIFICANCE There is a need for a specific definition of what types of development and which roads have metropolitan significance. Many of our local roadways are expected to carry an ever increasing load of traffic which is destined to other locations in the metro area. We feel that these types of roads should be considered for improvement prioritization in addition to Met Council's recommended metropolitan highway system. An example of two roadways which we feel have metropolitan significance are Trunk Highway 55 and Trunk Highway 149 (Dodd Road). Trunk Highway 55 is a primary connector to the metropolitan area and also carries a high proportion of Dakota County through traffic. The segment of TH -55 between the Mendota Bridge and I -35E is recommended for inclusion in the Year 2010 metropolitan highway system. We would recommend extending the designation to the future planned interchange with TH -3 (Lafayette Freeway) linking to US -52, which is another recommended metro highway. TH -149 provides an important connection between TH -55 and I -494. We have identified a high proportion of both through trips and trips destined to other non - Dakota County destinations on this roadway. PHILOSOPHICAL CONCERNS Eagan would like additional consideration given to the discussion of policies which concern supporting the existing infrastructure versus funding solutions of emerging problems in developing areas. Although preserving the existing system remains important, its priority should not overshadow the opportunity to avoid similar development problems which have occurred in the past. Opportunities to mitigate projected future congestion should be taken when feasible and should have an associated high priority. From Eagan's standpoint, there is an important distinction to be drawn between accessibility and mobility. There appears to be some confusion regarding these definitions within the Guide Plan. The accessibility and mobility of the roadway system are related to the functional classifications of the roads. They are inversely related, that is, as accessibility increases, the mobility decreases. The Plan frequently stresses the importance of maintaining existing accessibility, and although it is not explicitly mentioned, it is obvious that it is the mobility that is expected to degrade over time. Travel times on the peak hours will increase and the period of congestion is anticipated to lengthen beyond the current 1 to 2 hours. The Guide Plan offers few ideas as how to cope with this ever increasing problem. More thought is needed in this area and an expansion of how land use coordination might help mitigate these problems should be provided. /6q Mr. Steve Keefe Page Four July 5, 1988 DAKOTA COUNTY'S DEVELOPMENT GUIDE COMMENTS Eagan concurs with and supports the comments being submitted by Dakota County regarding the Guide Plan which are incorporated herein by reference and attached hereto. The City has been participating in a joint coordinated transportation planning effort that encompasses development planned by all communities within the county. The County's comments make it clear that such a process would be beneficial on a metropolitan scale. We are very interested in providing assistance to the Metropolitan Council regarding our findings and analysis of future transportation characteristics. Thank you again for this opportunity to comment on this very important effort. Sincerely, 7 — tt,...,.$ ie cc: TAC /jf Thomas A. Colbert Director of Public Works Gary Erickson, Dakota County Director of Physical Development Thomas L. Hedges, City Administrator i 7/6 INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT 196 14445 DIAMOND PATH ROSEMOUNT, MINNESOTA 55068 -4199 612 - 423 -9388 July 8, 1988 Mr. Thomas Hedges City Administrator City of Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Road Post Office Box 21199 Eagan, MN 55121 Dear Tom, / 7/ •DR. THOMAS F. WILSON PRINCIPAL ON SPECIAL ASSIGNMENT As you know, Construction Packages #1 and #2 for the Dakota Hills Middle School/Eagan High School facility are now complete, and by the time this letter reaches your desk, I expect that Construction Package #3 (structural steel and prestressed concrete slabs) will be well underway. That phase is slated for completion by September 15, 1988. As you also know, bids for Construction Package #4 came in at least $6 million over the projections that were given to District 196 by our architectural personnel. In assessing the reasons for this problem, we have determined that factors such as the size of the building, the speed of the project, the use of proprietary specifications, an incorrect assumption of economies of scale, and some irregular bidding practices by some subcontractors contributed to this problem. We want you to know that we have spent the last month in making modifications of the CP -4 bid contract in order to reduce the cost of building, and that these modifications were approved by the Board of Education at its meeting on Tuesday, July 5, 1988. Officials from Hammel Green and Abrahamson are now in the process of redrawing blueprints and redeveloping construction documents so we may advertise for bids beginning July 26, 1988. At this point, we expect to open bids on Tuesday, August 30, 1988, and to award bids on Thursday, September 1, 1988. As you have surely read in the newspaper and heard from friends, the middle school is still expected to open on September 1, 1989, and be occupied fully at that time. However, Eagan High School will not be ready for occupancy until an estimated date of January 1990. Whether we will occupy that building with students at that time has not yet been determined, as it is a function of what interim plans are developed to house elementary, middle, and high school students for the 1989 -90 school year. When we have developed a plan that is approved by the Board of Education, I will share the outcome of that plan and our occupancy plans for Eagan High School with you. I believe it is very important that you and other officials of the City have good information about the developments in this project since I think it is in the best interest of all members of the Eagan community to be well informed and full partners in this new school. Mr. Thomas Hedges July 8, 1988 Page 2 The fact that the building itself has been revised will not have an impact on the high tech education which is planned for the building, nor will it do any serious harm to the educational programming which is planned for the school. The technology which is slated for the school is almost all a function of the equipment which will be installed and almost entirely unrelated to the structure itself, so we still expect to have a full technological "School of the Future" in Eagan, Minnesota. Both the middle school and the high school will maintain and advance the high standards set by District 196 and offer at least the same high quality of education for which the district has developed an excellent reputation. Because we have been able to design the building with the input of scores of teachers and because the building will have an integrated wiring network for voice, computer, and video data, we are still confident that DHMS/EHS will be the most sophisticated and advanced school in the country when it opens, and we are further committed to the development of programs and personnel which will assure that the citizens of Eagan have one of the most well known, highly respected, and effective secondary schools in the country. That is our commitment and it remains unchanged! Sincerely, Thomas F. Wilson Principal on Special Assignment TFW:jp city of ccigcin 3830 PILOT KNOB ROAD, PO BOX 21199 EAGAN, MINNESOTA 55121 PHONE (612) 454 -8100 July 12, 1988 DAVID MACGILLIVRAY LUTHER FJELSTAD SPRINGSTED INC 85 EAST SEVENTH PL, STE 100 ST PAUL MN 55101 -2143 Dear Messrs. MacGillivray & Fjelstad: In official action that was taken by the Eagan City Council at a regular meeting held on Tuesday, July 5, 1988, the firm of Springsted, Inc., was hired as the City's primary fiscal consultant. Congratulations on your appointment and on behalf of our Mayor, City Council and appropriate staff, we are looking forward to starting a new and working relationship with your firm. It is my understanding that this official letter of acknowledgement will be crossing with a letter from Springsted acknowledging our Council's action. In any event, we are most anxious to meet with the both of you and begin work on an upcoming bond sale. In addition to that meeting, we should further discuss our City Council's action to designate your firm as the primary consultant and finally discuss how the consulting staff and City staff should conduct business on fiscal /bonding matters in the future. Thomas L. Hedges City Administrator cc: Gene VanOverbeke, Director of Finance TLH /kf X 73 THE LONE OAK TREE. THE SYMBOL OF STRENGTH AND GROWTH IN OUR COMMUNITY VIC ELLISON Mayor THOMAS EGAN DAVID K. GUSTAFSON PAMELA McCREA THEODORE WACHTER Council Members THOMAS HEDGES City Administrator EUGENE VAN OVERBEKE City Clerk SPRINGSTED PUBLIC FINANCE ADVISORS 55 East Seventh Place, Suite 100 Saint Pain t; nnesota 55101 2143 512223 3000 Fax 612.223 2002 July 8, 1988 Mayor Vic Ellison Mr. Thomas Hedges, Administrator Mr. Eugene VanOverbeke, Finance Director Eagan City Hall 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55122 Gentlemen: We understand from Mr. VanOverbeke that Springsted has been chosen as the City's financial advisor in all three areas. We are excited about the prospect of working with the City, and anxious to begin addressing the financial issues before the City. In our presentation we discussed the possibility of sitting down in an informal workshop setting with the City staff and /or elected officials to exchange information on the City's financial objectives, as well as each party's resources. We certainly still extend this offer, and would leave the proper timing of such a session to the City's discretion. There are a number of transitional topics which should be addressed. We would like to contact Mr. Hedges in the middle of the week of July 11 to schedule a meeting to discuss these items, as well as the City's financing plans. One topic which we want to examine further is the City's credit rating. We appreciate the confidence the City has placed in Springsted. We would like to re- emphasize our commitment to providing Eagan with the best financial advisory service available. We look forward to beginning our relationship and having it develop over the long term. Very sincerely yours, 6\ Robert D. Pulscher Chief Executive Officer gf Indiana Office 251 North Illinois Street. Suite 1510 Indianapolis, Indiana 46204 1942 317 - 2373636 Fax 317-237.3639 (71-(- Wisconsin Office 500 Elm Grove Road. SL to 101 Elm Grove Wisconsin 53122-0037 414.782 82 Fax 414./822904 ASSISTED HOUSING COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT * + = Increase /- = Decrease Status Report for Dakota County ** June, 1988 TOTAL ASSISTED HOUSING 1,040 Section 8 Existing: Certificates 373 1,171 1,544 - 9 Vouchers 36 163 199 -3 Moderate Rehab 4 21 25 0 Section 8 New Construction 247 300 547 0 Low Rent Housing 380 190 570 0 235 Home 0 41 41 0 236 Rental 0 526 526 0 Amount of Elderly Family_ Total ( + / -)* 2,412 3,452 Amount' Commercial/ of Elderly Family Multifamily Total Increase MHFA Local Participation 0 1 0 3 0 MHFA Home Improvement Loan 33 168 0 201 3 MHFA Home Rehab Loan 63 76 0 139 0 MHFA Home Energy Loan 10 124 0 134 2 Rental Rehab 38 49 5 92 0 CDBG Rehab Loan 87 161 0 248 0 CDBG Rehab Loan - Mobile Home 1 20 0 21 0 MHFA Solar Bank Energy Loan 0 8 0 8 0 312 Loan - Residential 4 15 0 19 0 312 Loan - Commercial/ Mixed Use N/A N/A 3 3 0 Weatherization 357 1,423 0 1,780 11 -22 TOTAL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 593 2,040 8 2,641 16 ** Numbers for the City of South St. Paul are included in Assisted Housing, Rental Rehab, and Weatherization, but are excluded from the rest of the Community Development programs; South St. Paul operates separate Community Development programs. Status Report for the City of Eagan June, 1988 Amount of ASSISTED HOUSING Elderly Family Total ( + / -)* Section 8 Existing: Certificates 36 233 269 -3 Vouchers 18 59 77 -4 Section 8 New Construction 0 33 33 0 Low Rent Housing 0 17 17 0 236 Rental 0 144 144 0 TOTAL ASSISTED HOUSING 54 485 539 -7 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT MHFA Home Improvement Loan 2 13 15 0 MHFA Home Rehab Loan 3 3 6 0 MHFA Home Energy Loan 1 10 11 0 CDBG Rehab Loan 1 4 5 0 Weatherization 5 66 71 2 TOTAL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 12 * + = Increase /- = Decrease !76 Amount of Elderly Family_ Total Increase 96 108 2 � MUNICIPAL g LEGISLATIC7E COMMISSION SIXTIETH MLC OPERATING COMMITTEE MEETING Tuesday, July 5, 1988 2:30 p.m. Messerli & Kramer Board Room 3800 West 80th Street Bloomington, Minnesota MINUTES 1500 Northland Plaza 3800 West 80th Street Bloomington, Minnesota 55431 (612) 893 -6650 The Sixtieth MLC Operating Committee Meeting was called to order by Ken Rosland, MLC Vice Chair. Members present: Ken Rosland, Edina; Mike McGuire, Maplewood; Jim Willis, Plymouth; Linda Barton, Burnsville; John Pidgeon, Bloomington; Jim Miller, Minnetonka; Barry Johnson, Woodbury; Tom Hedges, Eagan. Also present: Fred Christiansen, Finance Director - Maplewood; Eugene VanOverbeke, Finance Director - Eagan; Charles Darth, Brooklyn Park; Craig Dawson, Eden Prairie; Richard Gaalswyk, Maun Green Law Firm; Bob Renner, Jr., Laurie Huusko, and Morli Alm, Messerli & Kramer. Members absent: Tom Markus, Brooklyn Park; Carl Jullie, Eden Prairie; Robert Schaefer, Inver Grove Heights; Douglas Reeder, Maple Grove; James Andre, Roseville; Dwight Johnson, Shoreview; Mark Sather, White Bear Lake. A motion was made by B. Johnson and seconded by Barton to approve the minutes from the June 17, 1988, Operating Committee Meeting. The motion passed unanimously. Due to the absence of Treasurer, Mark Sather, no Treasurer's Report was given. Rosland reported for the Nominating Committee, stating that the Committee would make their recommendations for. 1988 -89 MLC Officers at the Board Meeting on July 7. Nominations would be accepted from the floor at that tirne. Renner gave an update on the proposed constitutional challenge of the Disparity Aid Section of the 1988 Omnibus Tax Bill. He introduced Laurie Huusko of Messerli & Kramer who will be assisting in the legal research on the proposed constitutional challenge. Member Cities: Bloomington, Brooklyn Park, Burnsville. Eagan. Eden Prairie, Edina. Inver Grove Heights. Maple Grove. Maplewood. Minnetonka. Plymouth. Roseville. Shoreview White Bear Lake. Woodbury 1 MLC Operating Committee Minutes July 5, 1988 Page 2 Renner then turned the discussion over to Dick Gaalswyk, legal counsel for the constitutional challenge, who reported on his legal research on previous decisions, the strategy he would implement, and the potential of winning the suit. Funding of the suit was discussed. Legal fees are estimated to be between $50,000 - $75,000, with an additional estimate of $10,000 for public relations work. Renner stated that at this time there were no other parties to the suit, although several cities had indicated their support and would possibly contribute to the funding. It was decided to fund the suit through the dues structure rather than by a special assessment. A lengthy discussion followed involving the issues of the chances of winning the suit, possibilities of legislative retribution, and the public image of the MLC. The general consensus was that, win or lose, an important message would be sent to the Legislature that would emphasize the importance of implementing good tax policy and increase the credibility of the MLC as an organization that acts on its beliefs. A motion was made by Willis and seconded by Pidgeon to recommend to the Board of Directors the initiation of the lawsuit challenging the constitutionality of the Disparity Aid Section of the 1988 Omnibus Tax Bill. A roll call vote was taken. McGuire aye Miller aye Willis aye B. Johnson nay Barton aye Hedges aye Pidgeon aye Rosland nay Christiansen aye Dawson aye The motion passed by a vote of 8 -2. A motion was made by Willis and seconded by Miller to raise the dues for 1988 -89 to $.30 per capita, with a $12,000 cap. The motion passed unanimously. Rosland presented a request from the League of Minnesota Cities for an opinion on whether the League should invest in an in- house computer property tax model, contract with Briggs and Morgan for use of the Briggs and Morgan model, or not become involved in using a computer model. It was decided that more information on the source of funding was necessary before a decision could be made by the MLC. The next Operating Committee was scheduled for Wednesday, August 3, at the Messerli & Kramer Board Room. The meeting was adjourned at 4:45 p.m. 11g C MUNICIPAL LEGISLATIC7E COMMISSION TWENTY -FIRST MLC BOARD OF DIRECTORS MEETING July 6, 1988 5:00 - 6:30 p.m. Decathlon Club, Javelin III Bloomington, Minnesota MINUTES 1500 Northland Plaza 3800 West 80th Street Bloomington, Minnesota 55431 (612) 893-6650 The Twenty -first MLC Board of Directors Meeting was called to order by Ken Rosland, MLC Vice Chair. Members present: James Miller, Minnetonka; Councilmember Gary Bastian, Maplewood; Mayor Gary Peterson, Eden Prairie; Mayor Vic Ellison and Tom Hedges, Eagan; Ken Rosland, Edina; Mayor Daniel McElroy and Linda Barton, Burnsville; John Pidgeon, Bloomington; Mark Sather, White Bear Lake; Barry Johnson, Woodbury; Councilmember Lloyd Ricker, Plymouth. Also present: Craig Dawson, Eden Prairie; Fred Christiansen, Finance Manager - Maple Grove; Councilmember Bob DeGhetto, Minnetonka; Charles Darth, Brooklyn Park; Dick Gaalswyk, Maun Green Law Firm; D. J. Leary, Media Services, Inc.; Bob Renner, Jr. and Morli Alm, Messerli & Kramer. Members absent: Mayor Kurt Laughinghouse, Bloomington; Mayor James Krautkremer and Tom Markus, Brooklyn Park; Councilmember Frederick Richards, Edina; Carl Jullie, Eden Prairie; Mayor William Saed and Robert Schaefer, Inver Grove Heights; Councilmember Donald Ramstad and Doug Reeder, Maple Grove; Michael McGuire, Maplewood; Mayor Larry Donlin, Minnetonka; Councilmember Vernon Johnson and James Andre, Roseville; Mayor Richard Wedell and Dwight Johnson, Shoreview; Mayor Jerry Briggs, White Bear Lake; Mayor Daniel Guider, Jr., Woodbury. A motion was made by Bastian and seconded by Peterson to approve the minutes of the April 27, 1988, and May 25, 1988, Board Meetings. The motion passed unanimously. Renner gave an update on the proposed constitutional challenge of the Disparity Aid Section of the 1988 Omnibus Tax Bill. Renner then turned the discussion over to Dick Gaalswyk, legal counsel for the constitutional challenge, who reported on his legal research on previous decisions, the strategy he would implement, and the potential of winning the suit. Member Cities: Bloomington. Brooklyn Park, Burnsville, Eagan, Eden Prairie. Edina. Inver Grove Heights. Maple Grove. Maplewood. Minnetonka. Plymouth. Roseville, Shoreview. White Bear Lake. Woodbury iiq MLC Board of Directors Minutes July 6, 1988 Page 2 Funding of the suit was discussed. Legal fees are estimated to be between $50,000 - $75,000, with an additional estimate of $10,000 for public relations work. Renner stated that at this time there were no other parties to the suit, although several cities had indicated their support and would possibly contribute to the funding. It was decided to fund the suit through the dues structure rather than by a special assessment. A lengthy discussion followed involving the issues of the chances of winning the suit, possibilities of legislative retribution, and the public image of the MLC. The general consensus was that, win or lose, an important message would be sent to the Legislature that would emphasize the importance of implementing good tax policy and increase the credibility of the MLC as an organization that acts on its beliefs. Rosland asked each non - voting member if he had official authorization to express the views of his respective city. After receiving affirmative responses from each, Rosland asked each member of the MLC Board if anyone had a concern with allowing these persons to vote on behalf of their cities. No objection was raised, therefore Rosland declared a quorum present. A motion was made by Peterson and seconded by Ellison to proceed with initiating a lawsuit challenging the constitutionality of the Disparity Aid Section of the 1988 Omnibus Tax Bill, subject to finding a plaintiff. The motion passed by a vote of 15 -1. Rosland presented the recommendations of the Nominating Committee. The slate of nominees was: Chair Richard Wedell, Mayor of Shoreview Vice Chair Mark Sather, City Manager of White Bear Lake Secretary /Treasurer Barry Johnson, City Manager of Woodbury No nominations were received from the floor. A motion was made, seconded, and passed unanimously to close nominations. A motion was made, seconded, and passed unanimously to approve the slate of officers. A motion was made by Bastian and seconded by Miller to approve the dues structure of $.30 per capita with a cap of $12,000 as recommended by the Operating Committee. The motion passed unanimously. lqo MLC Board of Directors Minutes July 6, 1988 Page 3 A motion was made by Miller and seconded by Bastian to extend the consulting contracts of Messerli & Kramer and D. J. Leary for a period of four months. This extension was necessary due to time constraints imposed by the proposed constitutional challenge. The motion passed unanimously. D. J. Leary presented the public relations report. He stated that he will be working very closely with Mona Meyer & McGrath on the constitutional challenge and concentrating on contacting suburban editors for a post- session briefing. Rosland presented a request from the League of Minnesota Cities for an opinion on whether the League should invest in an in- house computer property tax model, contract with Briggs and Morgan for use of the Briggs and Morgan model, or not become involved in using a computer model. It was decided that more information on the source of funding was necessary before a decision could be made by the MLC. Renner presented plaques of appreciation to the outgoing officers. Receiving plaques were Ken Rosland for his services as Vice Chair for 1987 -88 and Mark Sather for his services as Secretary /Treasurer for 1986 -88. Dan Guider, Jr. was absent, but will receive a plaque for his services as Chair for 1987 -88. The next MLC Board of Directors Meeting was scheduled for Wednesday, October 5. The meeting was adjourned at 6:30 p.m. A social hour followed. MEMO TO: COMMUNITY CENTER PROJECT FILE FROM: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES DATE: JULY 15, 1988 SUBJECT: CHARETTE SESSION WITH HASTINGS & CHIVETTA FOR PROPOSED COMMUNITY CENTER The following is a summary of the recap session that was held late Friday afternoon, July 8, for the two -day charette that was coordinated by the architects for our proposed Community Center project. City Councilmember Egan participated in a meeting with members of the Advisory Parks Commission and architects on Thursday and in attendance on Friday, were Mayor Ellison and City Councilmember Wachter. The preliminary program is outlined as follows: Major Component Area Ice Arena 42,850 S.F. Activity Floors 24,830 S.F. Natatorium 31,155 S.F. Multipurpose 7,325 S.F. Offices 1,175 S.F. Gross Building 107,335 S.F. Lighted Parking 112,500 S.F. Roads, Drives, Walks 16,400 S.F. Landscaping 119,790 S.F. The Municipal Building and Library do not offer much to the site in terms of continuity and, therefore, the architects are considering a change in access roads, parking lots and the appearance of the Municipal Building to improve on the overall continuity and appearance. F► There are approximately 13 developable acres left on the Municipal Center site and a community center requires a 2.5 acre footprint. H Eliminate one of three curb cuts on the north side and combine the two most westerly cuts into one access providing better traffic flow for the Library, Municipal Center and proposed Community Center. Site Plan 1, as presented, was a suburban concept; providing a drive - through traffic orientation. /82 STAFF MEMO JULY 15, 1988 PAGE TWO Site Plan 2 is a campus concept; keep parking on edge of development and emphasis a green open area which becomes a common open space to the Municipal Center, Community Center and Library. A 350 car max parking space requirement was used for the Center; it's unusual if all parking spaces would be taken at any given time. A third site plan was developed by the group at this review session that became a compromise to Site Plans 1 and 2 and the most acceptable to both the architects, elected officials and staff. Community Recreation Facility City Administrator TLH /kf CONSTRUCTION COSTS (INCLUDES SITE WORK & EOUIPMENT) LOW cc: Honorable Mayor & City Councilmembers Director of Parks & Recreation Vraa $65 /SF $82 /SF $115 /SF $6,976,775 $8,801,470 $12,343,525 183 RANGE MEDIUM HIGH MEMO TO: THOMAS L. HEDGES, CITY ADMINISTRATOR FROM: THOMAS A. COLBERT, DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS DATE: JULY 15, 1988 SUBJECT: BERRY PATCH PARK /MOONEY LAKE (POND JP -7) - ELEVATION CONTROL In response to several letters, comments and concerns raised by the riparian property owners to the above - referenced lake, a neighborhood meeting was held at one of the interested property owners home on May 24th. At that meeting, you accompanied the Director of Parks and Recreation, myself and a water quality specialist from the Dakota County Soil and Water Conservation District to meet with these concerned residents regarding several issues including, but not limited to: The lowered water elevation resulting from Project 473. The apparent change in water quality. The reclamation of the existing trailway segment along the south shoreline. With the 1972 Comprehensive Storm Sewer Management Plan adoption, the controlled outlet elevation for Mooney Lake (Pond JP -7) was established at 859.4 with a high water (flood) elevation of 865.2. In 1978, the Hilltop Addition Development was initiated which dedicated this wetland area as Berry Patch Park. In December of 1977 the elevation of this wetland was 856.8 feet. As a part of the park dedication requirements and related agreements, the Developer constructed a trailway along the south edge of the pond as a link in the overall master trailway system for the City. However, with the lack of completion of significant down stream storm sewer facilities, the outlet for this ponding basin was not constructed. Subsequently, over the 10 year wet cycle, the pond elevation rose by 6 -1/2 feet to 863.2 in March of 1987. As a part of Project 473, a storm sewer lift station outlet was installed at the east end lowering the pond elevation to the previously approved comprehensive master plan elevation of 859.4 which was still 2.6 feet above the historical elevation in 1977 prior to development around this lake. However, during the past 8 years, individual houses were built and /or resold at various higher elevations of the pond prior to the most recent storm sewer outlet project. These property owners have expressed considerable concern regarding the change in this wetland from when they b ilt or bought their home. Page Two During these neighborhood meetings, the Public Works Department explained the problems associated with changing the water elevation based on complications with upstream and downstream existing storm sewer facilities. The Parks Department expressed concerns regarding the necessity to reclaim and reintegrate this significant link in the comprehensive trailway system. However, the property owners still wish to pursue alternatives which may include but are not limited to the following: Abandon this segment of trailway along the pond's edge. Relocate the trailway to boulevard trail along Berry Ridge Road in the front yard areas. Reconstruct the trailway near the pond at a higher elevation. Reconstruct impacted storm sewer facilities to accommodate a higher elevation. Both the Parks and Recreation Director and myself have tried to explain the importance of complying with and adhering to previously approved master comprehensive plans for both the trailway network and the storm sewer system. We have also tried to explain that information was readily available regarding the planned controlled elevation at its lower level. However, the property owners wish to pursue investigation of alternative methods to reclaim the higher water elevation. Subsequently, they will be approaching the Parks and Recreation Commission at their meeting on August 4th to pursue a change in the comprehensive trail system as a first step towards achieving their desired higher pond elevation. In the interim, the Public Works Department will be investigating the costs associated with reconstruction of storm sewer facilities to accommodate these higher elevations. The main issues will be whether this link is significant enough to the comprehensive trail system to be retained at its present location and elevation and where the financing will come from to reconstruct the storm sewer facilities. As additional information and events occur, I will try to keep you informed and involved. If you would like staff to pursue additional alternatives or courses of action, please let us know. Respecjlly submitted, Thomas A. Colbert, Director of Public Works cc: Ken Vraa, Director of Parks and Recreation Mike Foertsch, Assistant City Engineer Mark Hanson, Consulting Design Engineer TAC/ j f t *5 MINUTES OF A SPECIAL MEETING OF THE EAGAN CITY COUNCIL 12, 1988 A special meeting of the EagO:P.1,t040 was held on Tuesday, July 12, 1988, at 6:30 p.m., at the Eagan Muni6itia1 . : 40ter. Present were Mayor Ellison and City Councilmembers Egan, Gustafson, McCrea and Wachter. Also present were Planner, Jim Sturm, Director of Public Works Colbert, and City Administrator Hedges. LONE OAK TRAVEk ENT PLAN City Administrator Hedges introduced the 140e Oak Travel Demand Management Plan Study that was recently completed • hy the .. engineering firm of BRW at the request and financing of Northwest Airl4h0, WachOvia Bank and Trust, and Larry Laukka. He stated that the purpos Management Plan was to examine future transportation needseltivetCbrporate expansion plans for these companies. He further stated that the City's transportation engineers, SEH, have been asked by City staff to review the study in detail. The Director of Public Works presented an in-depth overview of the study explaining the number of trips that are allocated as a result of the current indirect source permit for Northwest Airlines, the proposed improvements..that would be required to increase trips to NWA and other related issues. Mr. Bob 4re:r* appeared and discussed his review of the study, offering many confirmatiori of but also advising the City Council that the study does not adequateIY future growth projections for the Cities of Eagan and Mendota HeightS:.:: The Director of Public Works stated that the report is missing a factor of evaiiiatiPTO*kei to as the corridor movement which relates to traffic that travels irtji.igh the community without any local destination point. City CouncilMeji*ieri'lcCrea suggested that other neighboring cities be made aware of the transportation implications that corporate growth will cause in northwest Eagan. The City Administrator stated that cost of the proposed improvements is an important factor and that Northwest Airlines has asked for consideration by the City to participate in expenses that are incurred by the proposed transportation Mayor Ellison suggested staff contact other cities and agencies, review all roadway alternatives and, further, that the City staff review financing options for the proposed and : transportation improvements. There was no formal action taken but City staa was directed to proceed as directed. KINGS WOOD 2ND ADDITION Mayor Ellison stated that Jim Horne, the owner and developer of Kings Wood 2nd Addition, contacted him outside the City Colincil Chambers and requested a further continuance to the July 19, 1988, City Council meeting for any consideration of the Kings Wood 2 nd.-M4itilm: . .:1n motion by City Councilmember Wachter, seconded by Councilmemh4C-Creall. members voting in favor, consideration of the Kings Wood 2nd Addition platwas continued to the July 19, 1988, City Council meeting. Special Minutes July 12, 1988 PONDYIEW FINAL The Director of Public WdDlcs reported•::that the Pondview Addition final plat is in order for consideration :::::::=:�I:n.., a . .o:ton by City Councilmember McCrea, seconded by Councilmember Egan, with ''al'1::: i tubers voting in favor, the final plat for Pondview Addition was approved as presented. FINAL PLAT FOR TOWN CENTRE 100 SIXTH ADDITION The Director of Public Works: development agreement and all other documents are in order for ::: coiist:deratio :: :for the Town Centre 100 6th Addition. Mr. Jim Sturm, representing the advised the Council that an amendment to the Planned Unit Development Agreement may be required for this final plat. City Councilmembers expressed a::::concern that the final plat not be considered if all documents are nq:t: :t:: therefore, in a motion by City Councilmember Egan, seconded by Co:iiiic:i1itiembeV:ea, with all members voting in favor, the Town Centre 100 Sixth Addition final plat was continued to the July 19, 1988 City Council meeting. JOINT PLANNING COMMISSION SESSION Members of the Advisory Plannin . .Commission including its Chairperson, Tim Pawlenty, Commission members Doris Wi1kinS,..RonVoracek and Lori Trygg appeared to discuss both a proposed freeway zoning classification and senior housing sites. FREEWAY WM The City Administrator: ::::teviewed reasons why a freeway zoning classification was under consideration stating that the main purpose is to allow a limited mixture of land uses made mutually compatible with controls and high standards and, further, to encourage and accommodate commercial uses in freeway locations. He also stated that a freeway zoning classification could provide for integrated roadside business areas .designed tooffer a group of essential services to the motoring public and conveniei#t1:ocatioti :::: City Councilmember McCrea stated that another purpose is to protect a freeway ' froiii'cbngestion by proper location of high traffic generators through the use of: a: :freeway:;zoning classification. The City consulting planner, Mr :.John :Voss, appeared and reviewed in detail a sample ordinance for a freeway zoning c1a:Ssification. He also presented some examples of land tracks that freeway zoning classifications might apply to throughout the community. Both members of the Planning Commission and City Council discussed the restrictiveness of the proposed ordinance and raised the question as to whether freeway zoning could be imposed on select properties or if the classification can only be imposed as a voluntary: imeasure. The City Administrator was directed to contact the City Attorney and review the enforcement of the zoning classification. Mayor Ellison suggesteflthat: Planning Department consider increasing the setback standards,;:;:;: 4phte:ti:f3?:ar0hitectural controls, creating greater green areas and deeper setbacks from the freeway. Special Minutes July 12, 1988 Planning Commission Chair: suggested that the City staff study all freeway frontage and demonstrate to.•.•both the Planning Commission and City Council which properties adjacent to the freeways should for a freeway zoning classification. Commission member':::Vor,acek.. iggested that a public hearing be considered once the freeway frontage•:::hars: ::: ei : by staff to consider a comprehensive guide plan change which recognizes certain parcels as freeway zoning classification. City Councilmember Gustafson addressed various concerns regarding the proposed ordinance and specifical.) ;y : : : : :: :asited :. : : : : the size of restaurants be reexamined to determine an adequate sgl are :• . footage for a free - standing restaurant as provided for in the proposed ordinance..::::::: Mayor Ellison suggested that the : ::G ty study all freeway frontage and then inventory the existing and proposed_ : : :dev&Lopme:nnd include selected properties for freeway zoning as a part of;: -a::: :long -rA ge study. In a motion, by City Councilmember Egan, seconded by Councilmember McCrea, the Developers Task Force was directed to review the proposed freeway zoning classification ordinance and report their findings prior to a public hearing to be held by the Advisory Planning Commission at their regular meeting in August for the purpose of considering the freeway zoning classification as an. amendment to the zoning ordinance. SENIOR' IIOUS NG.•SITES City Administrator Hedges sated that. : . : : : i}akota County is a community development entitlement county and fwtrther :; : :: :teat the cities of Apple Valley, Burnsville and Eagan were designated of cities within the County to receive a portion of the entitlemenlocation by the County. It should be stated that a committee established by the three cities has determined that entitlement funds should be used to acquire senior housing sites and that Eagan was chosen this year for allocation of dollars for the acquisition of a senior housing site. He stated that the Planning Department has analyzed eight (8) sites in the City and staff is present to review those sites__and.,...£urther, the Planning Commission and City Council should determine whetter::a parat :: committee should be designated to study a site location process for'senior hour ng. Planning Commission member Wilkins suggested that an ad hoc committee be : :established for the purpose of examining various sites, further stating that: the input by senior citizens could be. helpful in the selection process. Mayor Ellison concurred with the appointment of an ad hoc committee and asked that the Planning staff review each of the eight (8) sites and that certain sites would be selected for further consideration by a committee to be appointed by the City Council. Tom Lovelace, Planning intern, stated that an additional site as recommended by the City Administrator and refereed to as Site 9, be added for review. After a discussion of the sites, it was agreed that Sites referenced as 2, 3, 8, and 9 and the addition of.... :p :r :.opex. y : : owned :.: by the Jewish Federation on Crestwood Drive be considered as sites::OZ?.: :the e ni it housing project by an ad hoc committee. Date City Clerk TLH MINUTES OF A REGULARaUETING OF THE EAGAN CITY COUNCIL EARIN, .MINNEs°TA July 19, 1988 A regular meeting of the'Eagan City Council was held on Tuesday, July 19, 1988 at 6:30 p.m. at the Eagan Municipal Center. Present were Mayor Vic Ellison and Councilmembers Wachter, Egan, Gustafson and McCrea. Also present were City Administrator Tom Hedges, Public Works Direct9r. Tom Colbert, City Planner Dale Runkle and City Attorney Jim Sheldon:. ..•.•. .•.•.•.• .•.•.•.• AGERbA •:•:•:.: Wachter moved, McCrea 00O to approve the agenda as presented. All votedx:ftVot MINUTES July 5, 1988 - Regular Meeting. City Administrator Tom Hedges stated a condition should be addekeL:.to Page 19 regarding the Alden Ponds plat as follows: 14. All trailways and 11- regarding the Four Oaks encroachment as recommended and Recreation Commission. Mayor Ellison stated on Page f2ipgai^ding the Ordinance Amendment to Chapter 11, the paragraph * regarding the vote should be moved to the end of the next paragraph. age 2 /REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING July 19, 1988 Upon motion by Gustafs seconded by Egan, it was resolved that the Minutes for the Juiy 1988 Regular Meeting be approved as amended. All voted in fav:tr :::::::;:: July 12, 1988 - Specia Upon motion by Gustafson, seconded by Wachter, it wasesolved that the Minutes for the July 12, 1988 Special Meeting be' approved as presented. All voted in favor. DEPARTMENT HEAD BUSINESS Councilmember Wachter cestiged if the oak tree outside of the Municipal Building was cuing 44e to the drought. Doug Reid stated the tree has gone doant lia0ause of the drought and should come back next spring. There was no further Deparftent-iied business. CONSENT AGENDA The following Consent Agenda items were submitted and recommended to be approved: A. Personnel Items. 1. Temporary Engi.neering:TeChni.cian Position /Park and Recreation Department. It was redoJNn ded authorize the City Administrator to approved the hiring a:::::::t emporary Engineering Technician for the Parks and RecreationiDepartment if a successful candidate is able to begin working with the City before the first Council meeting in August. 2. Temporary Clerical Pool. It was recommended to approve the hiring of Barbara Haller, NancyAlammelyelyn Moldenhauer and Laurie Remer as temporary cleacawt0r](e s for the City in the substitute "pool ". 3. Seasonal Streets Maintenance: Workers . It was recommended to accept the resignation of JAiti q.•.WCO ,and....as a seasonal street maintenance worker and to apipzpyi :::the.:.1 .z .ng of Bob Pilon and Jonathan Yates as seasonal streets maintenance workers. B. Plumber's Licenses. It was recommended to apprp.v4 ta plumber's licenses: Budget Plumbing Corlpoati6iasign Mechanical Services, Inc. and Gilbert Mechanical Ockiiractor4Inc. ;?age 3 /REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING July 19, 1988 It was recommended to approve a rubbish hauler's license for Richard's, Inc. D. Project 478, Receive': 'iftal A esSment Roll /Order Public Hearing (Lexington Hills Addition - Sanitary Sewer). It was recommended to receive the final assessment roll for Project 478 (Lexington Hills Addition - Sanitary Sewer) and schedule a public hearing to be held on August 16, 1988. E. Project 479, Receive::::Final Assessment Roll /Order Public Hearing (Lexington /Northview:::Trun Sewer) . It was recommended to ]rceive ?:the final assessment roll for Project 479 (Lexington /Norttivew ..Trunk .Sewer) and schedule a public hearing to be held ox l.:A g i st : ::1£ - : A988. • F. Project 461, Receive Final Assessment Roll /Order Public Hearing (Yankee Doodle Road - 35E to Lexington Avenue). It was recommended to receive the final assessment roll for Project 461 (Yankee Doodle Road - 3 5E. exington Avenue) and schedule a public hearing to be held it: August 16, 1988. G. Contract 88-23, Receive. Bids / aw ard Contract (Cliff Lake Centre - Streets and Signals .. .... Public Works Director Tom Colbei €::::: formed the Council that staff was working with Federal Land Company on easements to widen Rahn Road and Cliff Lake Road. He further stated that it has been a time consuming process in dealing with the estate which owns the land. He recommended to the Council that they authorize condemnation of this property. It was recommended to re0eiv :t:.Yiet: ids for Contract 88 -23 (Cliff Lake Centre - Streetand Sgnals) and award the Contract to the lowest responsible bicjder and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to all relatec}:::clocums . It was further recommei§ia ait a:ze condemnation of the necessary property. H. Contract 88 -13, Approve Change Order No. 1 (Project 452 - Storm Sewer Schedule). T4age 4 /REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING July 19, 1988 It was recommended to approve the final plat for Summerplace Addition and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute all related documents. J. Final Plat for Town :centre 100 Sixth Addition. Mayor Ellison asked Mr.Colbert if the necessary Amendment had been signed regarding this plat. Mr. Colbert stated affirmatively. It was recommended to approve the final plat_ for Town Centre 100 Sixth Addition. K. Contract 88 -7, and Bridle Ridge Parks. Award :Contract for Ohmann, Winkler, Jackson It was recommended to appai':tte: :lb bid to Central Landscaping for the base bid' aMtiiiiit''df $ "237, 060'.93 and alternate number one in the amount of $6,500.00. L. Approved Resolution Prohibiting On- Street Parking - Rahn Road (New Alignment). It was recommended to approve : : :a::resdlution prohibiting on- street parking for the relocatad'po * of Rahn Road. M. Final Plat Approval, .p0ar?ood 4iddition. Councilmember Gustafson questidt7W1 . the trailway requirement had been agreed upon. Mr. Colbert statedthe developer will install the trailways. It was recommended to approve the final plat for Deerwood Addition with additional trailway requirement and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute::::a,1 related documents. N. Final Plat, Eagandale Lemay' take Third Addition. It was recommended td approvehe final plat for Eagandale Lemay Lake Third Addition and u h» ae. Mayor and City Clerk to execute all related documentOMM O. Contract 88 -02, Receive Bids /Award Contract (1988 Seal Coating). It was recommended to rece,47 the: for Contract 88 -02 (1988 Seal Coating) and award awardetbitit4pt to Asteck, Inc. in the amount of $115,923.63 and authorize the :Mayor and City Clerk to execute all related Contracocuments. P. Project 544, Receive::::.eas.i44 t r eport /Order Public Hearing (Mallard Park Third Matifttteet Lighting) . It was recommended to receive the Feasibility Report for Project 544 (Mallard Park Third Addition - Street Lighting) and schedule a public hearing is ::: :::: i ltd :: is Atugust 16, 1988. Wachter moved, Egan seconded, the motion to approve the foregoing Consent Agenda iti?ns and authorized their implementation. All voted in favor. The public hearings were scheduled to begin at 7:00 p.m. Councilmember McCrea suggested moving to the Administrative Agenda at this point in order to begin the public hearings at the 7:00 p.m. designated time METROPOLITAN ::::WASTE::::CONTROL COMMISSION • City Administrator Tom::id :q€a:: t atcl::::that during 1987 MWCC upgraded the existing sanitary sewer lift 'station located adjacent to Brown Tank on Trunk Highway 55. The property owner, Veronica McClean, resisted dedication for the additional easements necessary to accommodate the expanded lift station and access road. Subsequently, MWCC proceeded with condemnation for the pumping facility as well as an access road to g.rom Trunk Highway 55. The access road was located on top ot trunk water main easement owned by the City offagaia Mr. Hedges stated there .:ar agreements affecting the City of Eagan. The first is a Stipulatit Settlement Condemnation whereby the City of Eagan receives ° tics bvitip for acquisition of the property incorporating the easement:. The second pertains to consent by the City of Eagan to allow Metro Waste to construct a bituminous access drive within the utility easement. MCCrea moved, Eagan seconded, the motion to approve a Stipulation of Settlement for..Metro Was.te.:::Control Commission Condemnation and a Consent oas-e neritfor an access road over City utility easements for the MWCC Sani Lift Station located adjacent to Brown Tank, Inc:`and authorized the mayor and City clerk to execute all relateC4ocum ;ts. All voted in favor. Councilmember McCrea sugges:tec an tinue with the Administrative update as it was not yet 7 :00 p.m. SPRINGSTED, INC. 2'age 6 /REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING July 19, 1988 SPEED STUDY ON BLACKHAWK ROAD Councilmember McCrea giiba tYie 'expense of doing the study, in particular regard the radar. The Chief of Police stated the Police Departmenoes have in -house radar equipment. Quite frequently the problem finding time for the squads to do the radar for the study. He further stated the Police Department will patrol the area as much as possible during the rush hours because of speeding in the area. ECONOMIC ?MENT COMMISSION Mr. Hedges stated there*is a i::::in -house strategic planning exercise scheduled and the fj,ndings :would be reviewed next Tuesday. He further stated the results t:::t1'ixereise would be submitted to the Councilmembers. Mr. Hedges'' iriformed••'•the Council he felt the Comm:Lssion did an excellent job. HISTORY COMMITTEE Mr. Hedges stated the History Commiee would have a meeting next week. He further stated Coun il: tuber Wachter is a member of the History Committee and that : ::6ne'0f4he items on the agenda would be the old town hall. Counci:Imerber •Crea stated she had paperwork regarding the historical clasz e;cation of the old town hall and that at the present time, it was' noc:lassified as a historical landmark. She stated she would give the:: :lperwork to Mr. Wachter. PLATTING REQUIREMENTS City Administrator Hedges apologized to the Council for any confusion regarding the final plats at the Special Meeting of July 12, 1988. He stated the staff. : ': very : :: : bus!. They are working on tightening their controls an h aite: de loped a Pre - screen Committee which consists of staff froach - o::'the departments. FIRE STATION N0. : 4 and NO. 5 Councilmember Wachter asSeYr:- Cx'ef Southern the status of Fire Station No. 4 and if recruiting had begun. Fire Chief Southern stated the lockers had arrived and that there was only minor matters to be finished and, of course, the clean up. He stated there would be an inspection of the station on July 26, 1988. He stated the recruiting was moving ::::alow pace because of the weather conditions and vacatitn s :t:&.ted no notices had been posted, however, they were interviewin11 applicants on file. He further stated that ::re Station*. 5 was progressing along nicely. That the roof : ams : : ©be up soon and that at the present time the walls were ekzig gpo t ructed. sage 7 /REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING July 19, 1988 VACATE PORTION OF KEBEC DRIVE PUBLIC RIGHT -OF -WAY Mayor Ellison opened tri P ? 1 e :t ng regarding the Kennebec Drive public right -of- way. Pubifcr4d ks Colbert stated that in response to the requests submitted by the applicant, Richard T. Curtin, owner of$ilver Bell Apartments, the Council scheduled a public hearing to be held to vacate a portion of the old abandoned dedicated right -of -way at Kennebec Drive. He stated all notices had been published in the legal newspaper and sent to all potentially affected utility companies informing them of the public hearing. The staff h not received any objections to the proposal. Councilmember McCrea gtastior:ied if the developer knew he would still need to apply for a Permit...to.. a..1 w the sign. Mr. Colbert stated he would inform the appalica Mayor Ellison questioned why the matter had continued for so long and asked if the City had "dropped the ball ". Mr. Colbert stated that originally the applicant wanted the sign on the public right -of -way and that much negotiation with the developer had gone on. He stated that staff had been in with the developer at all times. Wachter moved, hearing and approve public right -Of -way execute all related McCrea seccided, Ole motion to close the public the vacat:ioo:::=Qf. a portion of Kennebec Drive and authorize t.#0 rayor and City Clerk to documents. All votci::jii favor. VACATE PORTION OF RAHN ROAD PUBLIC RIGHT -OF -WAY Mayor Ellison opened the next public hearing for the evening regarding the vacation of a portion of Rahn Road public right -of -way. Public Works Director Col t stated that with the approval of the _Cliff Centre deveIs pit nt and the requirement to construct Cliff-Lake Road aWits 'intersection with Cliff Road, additional right -of -way beyond whatexisted for the present Rahn Road intersection with Rahn oad was required. With the realignment of Rahn Road to its intersecti ri: t #3new Cliff Lake Road construction, a portion of i ai : :Rth :: goad, adjacent to Rahn Park, was being abandoned. He further stated that as a part of the agreement for the acquisition of the additional right -of -way from the Federal Land property near the intersection with Cliff Road, it was proposed to vacate a portion of Rahn Road to reconvey a portion of Outlot B of the Cliff Lake Cortt ::;as : . partial offsetting compensation for the additiorj right znway dedication from Federal Land. He stated that:;:.#y this agreement, Federal Land had committed to providing a futiif'e park maifitenance access to Rahn Park from the internal development at a IQcation other than the existing Rahn Road right- of- way . , : . : . : t Iii the street right -of -way for Rahn Road in the vicinit:. :444jaOellt 04eral Land would create Rage 8 /REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING July 19, 1988 traffic congestion and circtation problems at the first intersection north of Cliff The City has existing utilities located within this Rahn Roach : : :: 0.i:o way, and therefore, although the public street right- of- W:ay:: : ti:ia lie vacated, it was staff's recommendation that utility :and sidewalk easements be retained. The vacat :ion of this public rigs -of -way would then minimize any impact on future setbacks for the development of the Federal Land property. Mr. Colbert informed the Council that all notices had been published in the legal newspaper and sent to all potentially affected public utilities informing them of the public hearing. Staff had received concerns. : : :to retain the utilities easements over the 80 foot right -of -way to::::incorparate existing utilities for both the City and private utilitcomp es . Councilmember Egan asked if: acreage of the two parcels being exchanged was comparabn::::a:2:e ::::Mr. Colbert stated they were not the same size. They :'Cibs the acreage acquired was less than the turn back. Mayor Ellison asked if vacation of the right -of -way would preclude the users of the park from usingthis area for parking. Mr. Colbert stated he felt there was.no :::need for overflow parking. Councilmember Egan questf:ot d:: :staff agreed that the access through the Federal Land prDporty wasa better alternative. Mr. Colbert stated that he felt i::*as : ..a better choice, if it was necessary. Egan moved, McCrea seconded, the motion to close the public hearing and approve the vacation of a portion of Rahn Road public right -of -way and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute all related documents, subject to the utility and sidewalk easements being retained. Gustafson, Ellison, Egan and McCrea voted in favor; Wachter voted against. PRELIMINARY 1 /KINGSWOOD 2ND ADDITION City Administrator Hedgis stated that at the June 21, 1988 City Council meeting, the Ki swoodSecand Addition Development Project consisting of a Comp $ 3 ye: `O :de Plan Amendment, a rezoning and preliminary plat were considered by the City Council. Action was taken to approve the Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment from a D -II to a D -I and the rezoning of 41.5 R -I single family acres. Due to the uncertainty of the location for the access road to serve a proposed community ceiter::::ea of Pilot Knob Road and the proposed Kingswood 2nd Ad4 ion' and proper time to allow engineering to best evaluategood access alignment for public safety movement, the item wa'' continued •tb the July 5 or July 12 meeting for further consideration. ' Page 9 /REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING July 19, 1988 Mr. Hedges stated that:g:g;t the July 5, 1988 meeting, the preliminary plat for the Kingswood 2nd Addition was continued until the July 19 meeting to prov.i 4e:g:;add :tiooa1;g: time for the City to review the proposed developiiiefritf of :ff (fife: ic Center property for the proposed Community Center. to determine projected future traffic impacts on the location of tie future intersection with Pilot Knob Road. By County standards, the intersection of the Kingswood 2nd Addition and the future Civic Center development must match. On July 7 and 8, the architectural team of Hastings & Chivetta met with various City Staff, Commissions and Counsel to review the proposed site and related internal circulations. Public Works Director Vim Colbert stated it would be a busy intersection with the CivicCentend the development. He further stated the property site was.,rugged and heavily wooded. Mr. Colbert referred to the handout whic::::was::: ire? ntd to the Council regarding recommended conditioris' if : preIliiiinary plat approval. He recommended approval of the nine conditions listed in the packet and the six additional conditions on the handout. He stated he had been in contact with the developer and that variances would be needed based upon hardships. Rollie Crawford, attorney for::::t:: eveloper, stated there had been many discussions regardi ie roadway alignment with the staff. He stated that the developer was basically in agreement with the conditions, however, he retested' certain changes. Mr. Crawford presented a handout to the Counci ctner.s.regarding his suggested changes to the conditions. He inforted e: Council the developer would cooperate in every way possible regarding the condition concerning the access and sanitary sewer service. He further requested the City to assist the developer in dealing with the County in obtaining street access to Outlot C. He requested a change in the minimum roadway width from the required 60 feet to 50 feet and a 30 foot back to curr:::;nstead.af the required 34 foot. He further requested the City a:0; :::a. assessments in the subdivision-for all cosncurr in the removal and reconstruction of the water'Iine and roadway to the northerly alignment. He requested the4 allow flexibility in the location in the roadway within the r ght ot-'way. the impact of the realigned access on the :etcj::::3iS and surrounding lots. Mr. Crawford apologized to the Council for the lateness in receiving the developer's request. He stated he had worked with the staff regarding some of the condition changes and the time frame did not allow them to give the information to the Council before the meeting. He further stated..f.sta:::::had not had time to review his most recent request. Mr. Crawford further stated that staff was recommending that Lot 11, Block 1 of KingswoodiAddition should be included in the replat of Kingswood 2nd Add t.1on.....Hes:te. ed the developer did not own this property and if it :iaS;:gtgg; :;t!':g request to include this Page 10 /REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING July 19, 1988 lot in the replat, the developer requested the City to incur the cost. He stated he does not the amount of the cost would be substantial. He further stated tha ::::Yi ::::at d the developer would work with the Staff and the City;ttdreyietWreen the preliminary plat and the final plat approvalo work out any problems. Mr. Colbert stated he shad not been able to meet with Staff regarding Mr. Crawford's suggestions. He could, however, comment from an engineering standpoint. He stated regarding the County spac:Lng guidelines he felt he could not recommend the request as it was contradictory to past City policy. He stated that he felt the area would have a lot of tratfic aXt i that the roads should be at the 60 foot width with the T4 foot::back of curb to back of curb City requirements. He stated::: that•.•..•. : if the developer's request for the 50 foot width and 30 foot.bae f_,curb was approved by the Council, it should be a varia iittd as far as the City giving the developer a credit' bn the'past utilities, he felt this was not City policy and that in the past all costs associated with development was the developer's obligation. He further stated he felt there was not sufficient hardship to justify the City paying the cost of the addition of the lot to the replat. City Attorney Sheldon stated:n:�:�`eference to Item 6 regarding the access to Outlots A, B and Cnd Xtem No 7 regarding County approval for the street accessto Pilrit Knob Road, that these were not conditions of the plat, onWrequests for assistance from the City. He stated these items if . appzaedhould therefore be a resolution from the Council. Mr. She1dtated the main concern, in his opinion, was the land locked partial and that the City must require an access to this property. Mr. Sheldon recommended combining Outlots A and B in regard to the access question. Mr. Colbert stated that it was anticipated that Wescott Road would be extended. However, thgre.:..is atypography problem. He stated one possible solution;:***tIoA and B being combined and the City granting an easemeno::: from Wescott Road. Greg Franke, engineer god the ►developer, stated the only logical access was from thenarthHurther stated he felt there would be no problem in comb ;ai'i : i ie: of t :4ts and obtaining access from Pilot Knob Road. Councilmember McCrea inquired of the developer in which areas they were willing to compromise regarding the conditions. Attorney Crawford stated he agrees with. Sheldon regarding Items 6 and 7 and the necessity of a resolutQrl' by:: tha:. Council . Mr. Frank stated the 56''foot width 'for the right -of -way was necessary to preserve the trees in the a :a. • ?age 11 /REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING July 19, 1988 Councilmember Egan inquired of Mr. Colbert if there would be an access problem in the future to Outlot C. Mr. Colbert stated there could be access from Cdro a t i btida a or Kingswood Road. Mr. Egan stated he saw no concern then rega ding the access and that he feels the matter should be resolved before the final plat approval. Mr. Egan stated he:= :was concerned about the traffic density on Coronation Road and felt the 50 foot right -of -way would be a problem. He further stated he felt the City could not bear the cost as recommended by the developer and felt it was inappropriate. Mayor Ellison commended: ::the staff, the attorneys and developer for their efforts in working toge He further stated he felt there were two main concerns::::(1):J e costs the developer requests the City to pay; and (2) thy; width: :: ::of the right -of -way. He stated he felt the City could not be costs. as it would set a precedent. He further stated::::t ROck :::L:ane could perhaps help the traffic congestion. Mr. Egan stated he was concerned regarding the road width because the City policy states collector roads must meet City standards and that this road was a collector road. Mr. Wachter stated he had no problem with the decrp00 in width of the road right-of-way as he was in favor a r iig the trees. McCrea moved, Wachter ecoiided, the motion to approve the rezoning and preliminary plat .ingswood 2nd Addition, subject to the following conditions: 1. These standard conditions of plat 'approval as adopted by Council action on September 15, 1987 shall be complied with A -1, B -1, B -2, B -3, B -4, C -1, C -2, C -3, C -5, D -1, E -1, F -1 and G -1. 2. The existing homes shall connect to City utility and change their addresses. 3. Outlot C along the s0t:thsid of the exception shall be renamed Outlot D. Page 12 /REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING July 19, 1988 8. If the required easeleents for Project 512 (Cutter's Ridge - Storm and Sanitary Sewer) through the proposed Kingswood 2nd Addition cannot be acquired :;:::: i:::: :::tjjn 1y:: manner, acquisition by condemnation should be initieatod . i :t.h : timeframe. 9. Park dedication shad: be fulfilled through a cash dedication on per lot basis *for all platted property excepting the two existing homestead lots. 10. The grading plan shall be revised to incorporate retaining walls as may be necessary to::::minimize_the impact on the existing vegetation to save signifidant trees. - 11. Any outlot must have public street access and /or sewer access. 12. The developer will w'ork . : eity staff regarding the realignment of the access to Pilot Knob Road. All voted in favor. McCrea moved, Wachter seconded,.tbemotion to approve the variance for a 50 foot road right.- 4:teay and a 30 foot back to curb requirement. No future variance “or* e:�ront yard set backs would be approved. This variance is beirig approved due to the hardship regarding saving the trees alongthe right -of -way. Councilmember Egan suggested therdAnd parking restrictions because of the variance. He stated he opposes the motion because of the 50 foot right -of -way width. Wachter, Ellison and McCrea voted in favor; Egan and Gustafson voted against. SOLiggki N ::A X T1I ON City Administrator Hedgs stated that at the June 21, 1988 City Council meeting, the -SQ:;ierhoita Addition /Eagle Enterprises were given consideration forComprehens.ve Guide Plan Amendment, rezoning and a preliminary p:f.a;t the APC held a public hearing at their meeting of May 26 and recommended approval of the applications. He stated that at the June 21 meeting Councilmembers discussed both the access problem to the property due to the County road intersection of Lexington and Diffley and further that the proposed land use is inconsistent::iththe Comprehensive Guide Plan. The applications were cot:iiiii�er:::, that time to the July 19, 1988 City Council meeting. City Planner Dale Runke stated the.:;matter had been continued by the Council for further review tarket study and transportation study and the ::::' e ¢ “;::: i * t verall plan. He further Page 13 /REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING July 19, 1988 stated there was considerat bt regarding the possible potential traffic problems. He stated the developer was asked to prepare a plan that demonstrated how th0 : : : :(tttI0 ate (the area that currently contains the Soderholm house)::eould2e : ceveloped in the future as well as the parcel to the noth. He stated office use is the intent for the outlot in Parcel 1,1 wever, the parcel is not being included in the plat. He also stated that as proposed the development would meet all City requirements regarding the parking and building setback requirements. Mr. Runkel further explained to the Council the detailed plan and land use proposed. He stated the applicant is aware of the recently adopted building exterior ordinance requirements. Al101ass:: nd brick is proposed for all buildings. Mr. Griswold, architect ..tor...the explained to the Council the land use and the:::: pote:it$3:::: future development. He stated the development would have'coritinu ty in design and the landscaping. He further stated the developer would work hard with the County regarding the access problem and feels the problem can be resolved. He stated he feels the corner of Lexington and Diffley lends itself well to the limited business. -use proposal. He feels the size of the property is too small..f4multiple family sites and feels the limited business is moreWcharacter with the area He feels that there would be n¢. as the businesses complement each other well regarding their peak times of traffic. He stated the single family res;dents''in the area would prefer the LB zoning over the residential . zon:n::: Mayor Ellison inquired regarding the: :access to Diffley Road and whether it would be a right in /right out access. Mr. Griswold stated it was a full access now and when completed it would be a right in and right out access. Mr. Wachter stated he felt the County may not allow that type of access. Mr. Griswold stated they will deal with the County rega &ng thccess. Mayor Ellison questioned the distance of tit iideps :::_from Lexington Avenue. Mr. Griswold stated would be20 feet::`and that it would in the same location as previously proposed for''the access which would be across from the church access:; Mayot Ellison inquired of Colbert regarding the requirements £ar .ngand asked if the 260 feet would be adequate. Mr. Colby :t�:: to : ecl:: ifelt it would be a potential problem and that the County would prefer internal circulation and the deletion of the access to Diffley Road. Councilmember Wachter stated he felt it was unfair for the Council to consider any action. ::s until the County had made their recommendation Councilmember McCrea stated she feI'Ethat when the matter had been continued it was for tr#ss reasons: M; the access question regarding what the County wbuld., (2) the need for the review of the retail study.:.state4:::: felt the Council was now Page 14 /REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING July 19, 1988 " caught in a box" as there were no reports available and that the City was being put in a position against the County. Ray Connelly, represen €:3tvi::::fbr:::s.s1derholm, stated he spoke with the County and the County stated they cannot take official action on the matter until Oey have a preliminary plat approval to work from. Mr. Connelly requested the Council take action on the rezoning and also further action regarding the access to enable the developer to take the matter to the County Plat Board. Councilmember Wachter stated he felt the developer should ask the County for their accepted guidelines before any Council action. Councilmember Egan inquired cif Colbert whether the County could inform the City of a proper :access at this time. Mr. Colbert stated he felt the only policy:::: they::::cou d:suggest was the policy regarding the internal circulation and further stated that the County was reluctant to grant the request. Councilmember Egan stated the retail study was not complete. He agreed with Councilmembers McCrea and Wachter and he too was reluctant to approve the matter withou .: : : further information. Representative from the.:.Coveehnt:: stated he was concerned regarding the prog4se d•development's affect on the church's access. Mr. Colbert ..stated there should be no problem. The access would remain the same for tile :::: church. He stated there could be one access from Lexington and internally there were several choices. Councilmember Gustafson inquired if the City owned the land that the wells were located on. Mr. Colbert responded affirmatively. Mr. Gustafson suggested approving the proposal subject to the condition that .• County.. the access. Mr. Colbert stated this could be:::tvnehni;,ie)t *t, the Council would still need to review the matter be± re tiinal plat approval. Mr.-Wachter stated he watild not vote for the proposal without further information. He stat'i.-it.•. .s. : ..nohe County's decision that it was the City's deci4 4T:: and t ar the City should not relinquish their authority. He stated matter was being considered prematurely as the question on the water reserve site would be known soon. Mayor Ellison informed the. :.deVhioper that it was apparent the matter would not pass at thataiiib4CtlIere was not a majority of the council in support. He t ij ther stat he is impressed with the plan and does approve of the rezoning. lie : suggested the three adjacent property owners shQUJ.d meet to di the water site plan. gage 15 /REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING July 19, 1988 Councilmernber McCrea gestioned the timeframe regarding the need for an extension of the...application regarding the preliminary plat. Mr. Hedges stated that:::.. #0. :: :Ct�:uuci1:� had 120 days to act upon the matter from the time of:•:si bmz drr*:•af• the application. Mr. Runkel stated he felt the time was getting close to that 120 days. Mr. Hedges stated the developer would need to agree to and request an extension and if this was not done the Council must either approve or deny the matter. Mr. Connelly the developer had no problem with an extension. He requested the Council ma) .e a recommendation to the County for review of the access problem. : :: Mr. Hedges stated the study would be in draft form next week and the Council could August _ study. Councilmembers McCrea and Wachter both stated they had no problems with the use of the land at this time. Their only concern was the access problem. The developer requested a continwc#0 regarding the preliminary plat. He stated his tenants will not stay if there is not an access to Di,f Y: :•.Road: He suggested a possible easement from the reservoir_ ::site and ttie Northwestern Bell site to eliminate their need for an access:,•...He stated the developer could nudge the access a little further nortY : : ; .across from the church driveway. Egan moved, Wachter seconded, the motion to continue the request for a Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment, a Planned Development Amendment for the rezoning of 4.52 R -4 Acres to a LB District, and a preliminary plat containing three lots and entitled Solderholm Addition until the .. : gtember : : :: 2:Q, 1988 City Council Meeting. All voted in Page 16 /REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING July 19, 1988 xx The applicant, Mr. Huerta, was present and requested approval of the license. Egan moved, Gustafson s in' ei • # Yi4 to approve a wine and strong beer license forthe new owner of the Eagan Tap, Mr. Julio de la Huerta. All votd. in favor. SITE PLAN REVIEW /LONE OAK ADDITION City Administrator Hedges stated the Planning Department had received the Site Plan Propcs:al for the Lone Oak Addition which is being marketed as The Watera::deve©pment. This development is located east of Trunk Highwag 149west of Cray Research, and south of Northwest Airlines. He sated :he signage, landscaping and lighting plan is the most soph" sti cated" complete landscaping proposal reviewed by the Plann : tn pa:r nt for any development. City Planner Dale Runkle stated that over the past several months the staff has been working with the Laukka Development Company in an effort to develop a Comprehensive Signage and Landscape Plan for the western portion of. -the Lone Oak Addition. He stated it had been a pleasure dealing wth Rick Burger of the Laukka Company, the landscape arch#4 Arteka and the architect in charge of the 44-b#4 Jack Buxell. He stated the signage plan is consistent a1.1 the wad :from the street signage to the rear service doors. He state::: of the proposal is the free standing granite kiosk that u11s the driver off Lone Oak Parkway into a small rest stop type """"ai<he goal is to establish a theme for the signage and landscaping that would ultimately continue into the Northwest Airlines and Cray Research areas. He stated an oversize set of plans had been previously provided for each Councilmember. i!age 17 /REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING July 19, 1988 Councilmembers McCrea and Wachter both stated they felt the presentation was very complete and very informative. Councilmember Egan stated he has been verttrt the project. Wachter moved, Gustafson:.seconded, the motion to approve the Landscape and Signage Site Plan Review for the Lone Oak Addition, subject to the following conditions: 1. The developer has full responsibility for the maintenance of the landscaping in the right -of -way. 2. Any replacement of the ornaiiiental street signs will be at the developer's expense. All voted in favor. V City Administrator Hedges informed the Council a variance application was received from Brian Skunberg for property located at 4739 Ridgewind Trail. He stated Mr. Skunberg was requesting a 4 foot variance to the required 15 footi# foot yard setback for the purpose of completing an accessory:::lu; ding. He further stated Mr. Skunberg was unaware of his nc00ssityto apply for a Building Permit from the City and, otieeinforme4 by a City Inspector, was most willing to pay the fee and::rocess the application. Once the Building Permit Application was •'piroce.s ed. and reviewed, it was determined that a variance would be i'6.41 6d from the rear yard setback and again Mr. Skunberg was most cooperative in applying for the variance and proceeding through the departmental review. He stated the slab and apron were poured last fall and the framing was done June 25, 1988. The concrete slab extends to within 3.5 to 4.0 feet from the property line and the accessory building and a dog house rests on the slab. He stated, the meets or exceeds all other setback requirements. .. i 4: fiirth: :::stated the required notices had been sent to neighboring::landowrxaers and that there was no need for the matter to go before the APC Councilmember Egan aske he : lkc, ,t the intended use of the shed. Mr. Skunberg stated if:: i.idii 3:: be:: i scd to store bikes and lawnmowers and the like. Mayor Ellison asked the applicant if the variance was okay with the neighbors. The applicant stated he had heard no complaints. Larry Stark, neighboring ..I.atdowri t (Lot 10, Block 4) , stated he was there representing thzea. tither n0 ..ghbors and himself regarding this matter. He staked they ate::: concerned- regarding the timberwall which the applicant has on hiproperty and questioned if the wall would be able to ::tiandle the 4aaitional weight of the shed. He questioned whether ::: 1'ie.. .k wp d:: collapse and requested the City send an inspector t: tssp0ct:::t : wall before construction. gage 18 /REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING July 19, 1988 Mr. Hedges stated it w: :not City policy to inspect timberwalls. He further sta the City could not accept the responsibility. Mr. Stark statOCth:at::t:thout the inspection he and his neighbors were against 1i&x4P0raira1 o the variance. Councilmember Wachter stated he felt there was a need to review a sketch of the building before the City's approval. Mayor Ellison suggested to the applicant that he discuss the concerns with the neighbors. Mr. Hedges stated perhaps the applicant could obtain an inspection by an architect for the neighbors' review. Egan moved, McCrea secaided, :tire motion to continue the application for the 4 foot variance to rear yard setback for Lot 4, Block 3 Parkridge Secpnd iddj.t o allow the applicant to meet with the neighboring laridtA.iners t ding their concerns. All voted in favor. Tom Hedges stated a public hearing za s held by the Advisory Planning Commission at their June meeting to consider a Waiver of Plat application to : : ::alThw a onveyance of land sale located northwest of the Sui:tlise Hill and Woodland Additions and south of the Wescott Garden Lot0::::.zz. Seetion 14. He stated the APC recommended approval of the Waivlat. City Planner Runkle stated no development would occur as :ect result of the Waiver of Plat; however, the applicant had submitted plans requesting a preliminary plat for a portion of the site. These plans had been modified slightly through the design process. The existing home near the northwest portion of the site has access onto Wescott Hills Drive. Councilmember Wachter reOrred.:tfa:::e APC Minutes and inquired if the meeting between Mr. W dstrom and the developer had been set. Mr. Runkel stated the matter ''had been attended to. Brad Swenson appeared Q . :ap.pL c ant . Gustafson moved, Wachter seconded, the motion to approve the Waiver of Plat for William Huttner for the conveyance of a land sale located northwest of the Sunrise Hills and Woodland Additions and south of the Wescott Garden Lots in Section 14. All voted in favor. COMPREHENSIVE GUIDE P :. AMENDMEI+1'Y'I.PD /PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR ALL SAINTS LUTHERAN CriuRCH ADDITION City Administrator Hedge blic hearing was held by the APC at their June 28, 19#3$::::tmi00tinq:::::0::::consider separate WAIVER OF PLAT /WILLIAM HUTTNER f:age 19 /REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING July 19, 1988 applications requesting a re:;bning of 3.85 acres within the Lexington South Planned Development from an R -1 to a PF District and a Preliminary Plat fork ]1:ztS.:: Church addition. A Comprehensive Guide Plan Aieiidfitonis :.necessary changing the property from its present designation of D -II. The APC recommended approval of the applications.;:: City Planner Runkle stated the site is located at the southeast intersection of Lexington Avenue and Wescott Road. He further stated the APC's only concern was regarding the landscaping and the matter is addressed n suggested Condition No. 8. Mayor Ellison stated thine hacbeen an erosion problem with a house on Wescott in that areg:durng the super storm. He asked if this would be a concern forthe..Church in the future. Public Works Director Colbert stated the : iriagetale' could handle the overflow. Gustafson moved, Egan seconded, the motion to approve the Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment from the current D -II designation. All voted in favor. Gustafson moved, McCrea second motion to approve the Planned Development Amendmene:oning:: of approximately 4 acres zoned R -1 within the LexingtOtfSouth Kanned Development to a PF (Public Facilities) District..;: All v oted in favor. Gustafson moved, McCrea secondede: motion to approve a Preliminary Plat entitled All Saints Lutheran Church, subject to the following conditions: 1. These standard conditions of plat approval as adopted by Council action on September 15, 1987 shall be complied with: Al, B1, B2, B3, Cl, C2, C4, C5, D1.:; :::E1 Fl t d G1. 2. Any signage over 7 £eet tai hall require a conditional use permit. 3. Revise grading plan :: , t p ; . ; Vide. swales to minimize the potential for trapping ttiri l:c ii: ::::the northerly side of the proposed building. 4. An additional catch basin is required in the southwest corner of the proposed parking area. 5. The development is reg red' td a manhole at the northerly terminus of the saatary sewet:::line provided to serve the site. 6. The development is requixed : ; : ; p ; wide a 20 foot slope easement along Lexington Ave0.4 0 :f uture upgrading. Page 20 /REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING July 19, 1988 All voted in favor. 7. The development is :r: quired to provide a 10 foot wide permanent and additional 15foot wide temporary construction easement along the southerlir plat bo nib ary. 8. Berming should be graduated from the southeast section towards the north to a three foot level with pine trees to be incorporated on top of the berm. TOWN CENTRE 7 T ENTH ADDITION Mr. Hedges stated a public hearing was held by the Advisory Planning Commission at theiregulr meeting on June 28, 1988 to consider separate applications Federal Land Company for a preliminary plat for 0 /004:o 70 Tenth Addition, a Conditional Use Permit to aI10W•a . car''iash and 'motor fuel sales in a CSC district and a setback variance of 20 feet for the gasoline pump island canopy. The APC recommended denial of the applications. The major issues for the denial was the building exterior materials and the lack of landscaping. Dale Runkle presented the proposed - Plans stated the APC denied the application. for the 1. The landscape plan was not : projects in the City. 2. The building exterior was proposed as block. to the Council. He following reasons: with other commercial grey /brown concrete 3. The canopy for the gasoline pumps required a 20 foot setback variance along the freeway frontage and there is a Super America in the auto mall. Mr. Runkle stated a revised landscape plan had been prepared that addressed the concerns'expressod by the Advisory Planning Commission. He stated the plan was:: :well done and related nicely to the auto mall to the immediait a the free standing canopy would be eliminated ifAtiteitindiadesired and an alternate plan would be prepared that attached to the building. He stated the canopy was important to the applicant because they felt it helped define the drive lane and the car drop area. Martin Colin, Federal Land::: 4*any., stated the Mermaid operation was a franchised operation. fe: : . stated that they have been working with the applicants :'egarding . .* landscape -plan and feel the new proposed plan was a`iood plan. Ray Berg of the Esberg ±5 the;. :. actual= ' developer of the car wash. Mr. Berg stated they ara:::v ady*::t4::GQinply with all City Page 21 /REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING July 19, 1988 requirements. He said the ccporation does have other Mermaid Car Washes in the area. He further stated that a car wash uses less water to wash a car then wa ling :theo r at home. He also said that there is the potential to redYeld :faith:: ::their car wash. Mr. Berg relayed the background of hip :company to the Council. Mr. Berg presented overall, landscaping and building design plans to the Council. He stated they will increase the berming with the landscaping. They feel the canopy is necessary as it provides a focal point for the smooth traffic flow through the car wash. Mr. Berg presented samples of thc brick for the exterior of the building to the Council. He urther ::presented the freeway visibility sketch to the Council.:::::;:: Councilmember Egan inquired of Berg what materials would be used for the canopy. Mr . :: : :g: : :s :ee :::th.ey would be the standard materials and that it would be metal faced. He further stated there would be down - casted lighting. Mr. Egan asked Mr. Berg to explain the traffic flow through the car wash. Mr. Berg stated there are three lanes for the car wash. He stated the canopy is 12 feet to the bottom and 4 feet in height and it covers two of the lanes. Councilmember McCrea had coretns::: 'etgarding the retail sales. Mr. Berg stated that the customers:: :drive into the building and then exist the car inside of the:iilding.::McCrea questioned what was sold inside of the building...MBerg stated miscellaneous auto supplies such as mirrors and car :mat :s .. McCrea asked if customers would come and park their cars to pdr'Chase :retail items and not receive a car wash. Mr. Berg stated they do not want retail sales only. McCrea questioned how many parking spaces were available. Mr. Berg stated there were 18 spaces and that there would be between 17 and 18 employees working during peak times. McCrea asked if the water :: Would be ocycled. Mr. Berg stated that currently the Apple Valley:: tacL j..jtyt:::had the ability but they are not recycling the water:::':: Public Works Director t,estiorzed the 30 foot entrance and the 30 foot exit lanes. He stated::.. that::::tha.s,.. be wider than the five lanes on Yankee Doodle :#that :::# 01:s this is excessive and not necessary and that the developer could scale down the width of the entrance and exits and add more landscaping. Mr. Berg stated the width of the entrances and exits were necessary as there are three doo:s:::comang in and out of the car wash facility. He state that :t s woulii�:� help keep a smooth flow through the car wash and thatthere would:::.be no traffic congestion. He stated they could restrictthe entrance and open up the width internally. Page 22 /REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING July 19, 1988 Councilmember Egan sta he feels that there is the need for the :30 foot entrance and exit. McCrea stated she agrees that if the area looks congested the cus:tme ?t ar::t 1. come into the car wash facility. The Council discuastd :e i:rance /exit problem in detail. Mayor Ellison stated : :: : that the developer was sending the problem to the City streetsand that the congestion problem should be solved internally. McCrea perhaps directional signs could be installed. Mr. Berg stated they do have directional signs showing the exit. Mayor Ellison asked if:::::the exterior materials meet the new development standards. Mr. midges: ::stated they did meet the standard as it was 100% brick and g1aSs. Mayor Ellison asked if ..the.. canopy . could be deleted and gates or striping could be used iateat3:::Mz:::::::ig stated they do have stripes, however, the canopy Helps :iith traffic flow. McCrea asked if there was a similar facility in Apple Valley. Mr. Berg stated it is very similar except for the different entrance location. McCrea suggested that staff check with the Apple Valley and Burnsville staff to see if.•: : here was a traffic congestion problem. Mr. Wachter ztatedJie had used other Mermaid facilities and there had not. ...coigestion problem. McCrea moved, Wachter secEide4,, motion to approve a preliminary plat entitled Towns Ce.ritre70 Tenth Addition, subject to the following conditions: 1. These standard conditions of plat approval as adopted by Council action on September 15, 1987 shall be complied with: Al, Bi, B2, C2, C4, D1, El, F1 and G1. 2. All signage shall be . pu5:ect _ tc one -time signage fee of $2.50 per square foot. 3. The development is required"to provide a 3 CFS storm sewer outlet to serve the norther Y :adjacent proposed Outlot A. 4. There shall be land: xe :ti4 along the freeway side of the facility to shield the canopy. 5. The building shall be constructed of brick or of a texture suitable to the surrounding facilities developed in the area. McCrea suggested includip0 a''cdnci on that the staff should review the Burnsville and Ap01.e Valley"Meimaid facilities regarding the traffic congestion and confusion. Councilmember Egan suggested leaving the matter to the stiff's discre It was agreed to exclude the condition. Page 23/REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING July 19, 1988 •••••••.• All voted in favor. Egan moved, McCrea sec004e4.41g4on to approve a Conditional Use Permit to facility and motor fuel sales in a CSC District. Al.kvoted in favor. Egan moved, Wachter se66hded, the motion to approve a variance for the canopy setback of 20 feet for the gasoline pump island located on a portion of existing Outlot B, Town Centre First Addition or proposed Outlot A. After discussion betwe"Oi theqouncilmembers, it was decided there was no hardship to base theXTAriance upon. Councilmember Egan withdrew his motion regardii the variance Mr. Berg requested a conset. 1iCgrading and foundation permit. He also requested tii6t6t4fitbifti470 Tenth Addition be placed on the next agenda for final plat approval. Mr. Hedges stated the matter could not be put on the next Council agenda because the developer had not met the requirements for final plat approval. He further stated that early approval of foundation and grading permits puts a hardship on thp§:taff and recommended against early approval. McCrea stated she feelCth6ie shOlIld be no pressures put on the staff to move one plat ahegclotoher plats. RAHNCLIFF SEddi4DTION City Administrator Hedges stated a public hearing was held by the Advisory Planning Commission at their regular meeting on June 28, 1988 to consider applications for the rezoning of 5.6 Limited Business and 11.2 Roadside Business to a commercial planned development district and a prA4m.i for the Rahncliff Second Addition. In additionippt".0hive Guide Plan Amendment was required. He stated the AC re400thended approval of the ••.••• applications. City Planner Runkle statg4C4te.„.is located between Rahn Road and Highway 35E along . EliO40444Cof Cliff Road. He stated the uses proposed for this development are consistent with the existing zoning districts. The planned development zoning allows the City the opportunity to review the overall development at this time as opposed to individual requests on each lot. Also, architectural landscaping and sig0400compatibility will be addressed with this plat. Mr. the site is very flat and highly visible from High04 As would be primarily from the previously constructed Rahncliff Cour± and to secondary drives connecting to Rahn Road. Shared parking aVeas provide 832 stalls, well above the amount reguitOdja"cp440h is 730 to 815 stalls. Mr. Runkle described the breV41044::: :::*0Warea and the proposed `age 24 /REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING July 19, 1988 use to the Council. He stataccess and cross - parking easements needed to be approved by the City. Ray Williams presentedthe'de e1ap tit plans to the Council. Roger Grant presented the landscape plan to the Council. The exterior design and building ::.samples were shown to the Councilmembers. Councilmember Wachter inquired what happened to the hotel. Mr. Williams stated the surveys did not show enough people in the area and the hotels could not get : : financing for the project. Mayor Ellison complimetted tYe: :developer on the landscaping and exterior design. Mr. Egari stated the landscape and exterior design were excellent in his M Egan stated there was very significant zoning chair was addressing at the meeting and that adding tetaiT wasnot allowed under the current zoning. He stated he felt the Council needed to review the retail study and the possible traffic problems before acting on the matter. Councilmember Wachter stated he.agre s with Mr. Egan on the zoning problem. Mr. Williams stated .hey'have tried to meet the requirements of the RB zoning. *Cithat :: at the present time the developer could not get a h td "in the :.area. Mr. Wachter stated the project may be premature for .. : tYiarea: Councilmember McCrea stated that she had reviewed the code ' book.:.:gn ::: RB zoning and stated it eliminates alot of uses and she feels : thheRB zoning should be reviewed. Councilmember McCrea stated the retail study would be completed soon and the Council would be meeting in a workshop to review the study. Wachter moved, Egan secO i : t e:aiotion to continue the Comprehensive Guide Plan Ameimenta rezoning of 16.08 LB and RBacres to a Commercial Planned Development and a preliminary plat entit :led. Rahncliff Second Attion:i:intil the August 16, 1988 City Council Meeting to allow the::.: 1. : . : HQ.. : . xpview the retail study. All voted in favor. AD HOC SENIOR HOUSING SITE SELECTION COMMITTEE City Administrator Hedges stated that at a Special Joint Workshop Meeting of the City C9ifl1 ;and Advisory Planning Commission authorization was .c v.eT1 3i3 e City Council to establish an Ad. Hoc Senior Housing Site::::Selectioiiommittee for the purpose of reviewing five sites thatthe City is for acquisition to construct a S4iior Housing: ::Project in future years. He stated the Eagan Senior CXi..zn9.et ionthly and their noon luncheon was Wednesday, July::: 1: ::: a ::: :£.a?eXace , the Planning Intern, Page 25 /REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING July 19, 1988 and City Recreation Coordinator, Dorothy Peterson, addressed the group and four persons in attendance volunteered to serve on the committee. In addition to thii* *q exscM , :Doris Wilkins and Gary Graves have been designated: :- Chakper Pawlenty to serve as representatives from the Advisory Planning Commission. Councilmembers recommended the following names to the Administrator as possible members for the committee: Martin DesLauriers, Bob Peterson, Jolene Billy, Bob Chowders and Connie Lea. Wachter moved, Egan seconded ; : : motion to approve the appointment of Ad Hoc Senior::Housihg Site Selection Committee based upon the above nominations,subject :to their acceptance. All voted in favor. TEMPORARY SIGN /PILO'1'' Noii - kdAD CONSTRUCTION City Administrator Hedges stated the the churches had requested they be allowed to erect directional signs for a few weeks during the construction period of Pilot Knob Road. Mr. Hedges suggested allowing the signs to be erec without a permit. He stated the signs would have to be. OVi d' two weeks after the construction ends. Wachter moved, Gustafson_: :se 0andect, the motion to allow temporary signs for churches and- bu$inesses impacted by the Pilot Knob Road construction. All voted iri'f vor:. RETAIL STUDY Councilmember Gustafson stated he was frustrated because of the delay of the retail study. He stated the study should have been completed in May and that the.. :: :l:ay 9 study has delayed alot of the development projects : ]:iii: -Riau <: Egan moved, Gustafson seconded; the motion to schedule a meeting to review the retai::::$tudy ::p:lan on August 8, 1988 at 7:00 p.m. All voted in favor. CARRIAGE HILLS GOLF COURSE Mayor Ellison updated the Councilmembers on the the progress regarding the matter. MISS:> GAN CO?EST Councilmember McCrea asked if the ditty endorses the Miss Eagan Contest. Mayor Ellison statit was a m ;tchant who was endorsing the matter. It was suggested::::that . ye; r the City become involved with the Miss Eagan x te :: : Page 26/REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING July 19, 1988 Councilmember McCrea barn matter. City Planner further stated provisions August. If the matter was would be issued. POLE BARN aakd tor an . ate regarding the pole RkI6-ga had been in contact and we; to be completed by the first of neit: attended to by August 1, citations BILLS OVERBEK.E vAN ••••••••.•-