08/02/1988 - City Council RegularREGULAR MEETING
EAGAN CITY COUNCIL
EAGAN, MINNESOTA
MUNICIPAL CENTER BUILDING
AUGUST 2, 1988
6:30 P.M.
I. 6:30
II. 6:35
III. 6:40
IV. 6:45
P'
V. 6:55
P• ``l
P'
.1
.1S
IC
re \ G.
ell\H.
.��I.
P,,. I K.
").1 L.
;,t M.
Q y2 N.
;7.110.
r.1,-• P.
P'a�
24 R
.1 •
S .
34T.
Pr Au.
A.
B.
C.
D.
E.
F.
AGENDA
- ROLL CALL & PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE (BLUE)
- ADOPT AGENDA & APPROVAL OF MINUTES (BLUE)
- TAX ABATEMENTS - DAKOTA COUNTY ASSESSORS OFFICE
- DEPARTMENT HEAD BUSINESS (BLUE)
POLICE DEPARTMENT
DNR 1988 Deer Population Control/Special Hunt
Minnesota River Valley Deer Management Task Force
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
Park & Ride Site Telephone Service (I -35E & Cliff Rd)
CONSENT AGENDA (PINK)
PERSONNEL ITEMS
LICENSE, Plumbers
APPROVE List of Election Judges
PROJ 545, Receive Report/Order Public Hearing (Clearview Add - Streets)
PROJECT 549, Receive Report/Order Public Hearing (Stratford Oaks -
Sanitary & Storm Sewer)
PROJECT 550A Contract 88-29, Receive Report/Approve Plans &
Specifications (Well #13)
PROJECT 493, Receive Final Assessment Roll/Order Public Hearing
(Greensboro 2nd Addition - Streets and Utilities)
PROJECT 503, Receive Final Assessment Roll/Order Public Hearing
(Windtree 8th Addition - Streets & Utilities)
FINAL PLAT, Blackhawk Ponds Addition
PROJECT 486, Receive Final Assessment Roll/Order Public Hearing (EZ Air
Park - Storm Sewer)
PROJECT 492, Receive Final Assessment Roll/Order Public Hearing (Lone
Oak 2nd Addition/O'Neil Drive - Water & Sanitary)
PROJECT 502, Receive Final Assessment Roll/Order Public Hearing (R & B
Addition)
PROJECT 505, Receive Final Assessment Roll/Order Public Hearing
(Country Hollow Addition - Trunk Storm & Sanitary)
PROJECT 460B, Receive Final Assessment Roll/Order Public Hearing (North
Nicols Road)
PROJECT 499, Receive Final Assessment Roll/Order Public Hearing (Chapel
Hill Baptist Church - Streets)
PROJECT 504, Receive Final Assessment Roll/Order Public Hearing
(Whispering Woods 2nd Addition - Streets & Utilities)
TRAFFIC SIGNAL MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT #88-09 With Dakota County (Target
Entrance)
CONTRACT 88-24, Approve Plans/Authorize Advertisement for Bids
(Lexington Reservoir)
PROJECT 542, Receive Report/Order Public Hearing (Alden Pond - Streets
& Utilities)
CONTRACT 85-26, Authorize Final Payment/Acceptance (Wells #8 & #9)
VACATE Drainage & Utility Easement, Receive Petition/Order Public
Hearing (Lot 8, Hilltop of Eagan)
VI. 7:00
1 B.
VII.
0642_ B.
P,
yr- D.
VIII.
et.6a A.
F.$2 -B.
S;SC.
1 ,
0.
VI D.
(D4'E.
A.
IX.
X.
XI.
XII.
PUBLIC HEARINGS (SALMON)
PROJECT 541, Country Hollow 2nd Addition - Trunk Utilities
PARTIAL VACATION of Right of Way, Cedarvale Boulevard (Will Be
Continued to August 16, 1988, City Council Meeting)
OLD BUSINESS (ORCHID)
COMPREHENSIVE GUIDE PLAN AMENDMENT, Lexington Land Co, and REZONING of
57, R-3 (Townhouse) Acres to Planned Development District Located South
of Bulk Mail Ctr Along Lexington Ave in SES of Sec 10
VARIANCES, Parking Lot Expansion, Cedarvale Shopping Center (Will be
Continued to August 16, 1988 City Council Meeting)
VARIANCE, 4739 Ridgewind Trail/Brian Skunberg, for a 4' Variance to the
Rear Yard Setback at Lot 4, Block 3, Park Ridge 2nd Addition
REQUEST to Reconsider Condition of Preliminary Plat Approval (Hosford
1st Addition)
NEW BUSINESS (GRAY)
CORRECTION, Land Surveyors Certificate, Bridle Ridge 1st Addition
SPECIAL PERMIT, New Horizon Homes, Inc., to Allow a Temporary
Advertising Sign for Boulder Ridge, Located at Cliff & Thomas Lake Rd
VARIANCE, Tim Payne, To Allow a 56' Radio Tower in Side Yard, Located
at Lot 6, Block 2, Brittany 5th Addition
WAIVER OF PLAT, Zachman Brothers Construction Company, Inc., to Allow
Individual Ownership, Lots 2 and 9, Block 1, Cinnamon Ridge Trail
REZONING and PRELIMINARY PLAT, Galaxie Cliff Plaza/Cliff Plaza
Partnership, of 25.36 A (Agricultural) Acres to a Planned Development
District Located South of Cliff Road,
of I -35E in NW4 of Sec 32
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT, Yocum Oil Co,
Station and Car Wash on Lot 5, Block
Located at NE Intersection of Thomas
SW4 of Sec 28
WAIVER OF PLAT, Vincent J. Kennedy, to Split Lot 5, Zehnder Acres, into
Separate Parcels Located in SES of Sec 4, North of Lone Oak Road and
West of Pilot Knob Road
WAIVER OF PLAT, Cliff Road Properties, to Combine a Portion of Outlot
B, Cliff Lake Centre Add, With a Parcel (011-76) to West Located Along
West Side of Proposed Cliff Lake Rd in SW4 of Sec 29 & SE' of Sec 30
West of Galaxie Avenue and East
to Allow an Automobile Service
1, Thomas Lake Center Addition,
Center Drive and Cliff Road, in
ADDITIONAL ITEMS (GOLD)
ADMINISTRATIVE AGENDA (GREEN)
VISITORS TO BE HEARD (for those persons not
ADJOURNMENT
on agenda)
MEMO TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIIMEMBERS
FROM: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES
DATE: JULY 28, 1988
SUBJECT: AGENDA INFORMATION FOR AUGUST 2, 1988 CITY COUNCIL
MEETING
APPROVE MINUTES ADOPT AGENDA
After approval is given to the August 2, 1988 agenda and regular
City Council meeting minutes for the July 19, 1988 meeting and
special minutes for the May 26 and June 20 special meetings, the
following items are in order for consideration.
TAX ABATEME DAKOTA COUNTY ASSESSOR'S OFFICE
Four (4) tax abatements are recommended by the Dakota County
Assessor's Office for the following properties: Lorraine Goers,
Donald Gehan, Donald Jeffreys and Bill Wernersbach. For
additional information on the proposed tax abatements, refer to a
memo from Mr. Bill Peterson, the Dakota County Assessor's Office
and location maps prepared by our Engineering Department
des ibing the subject parcels referenced as pages c? through
frt.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the tax
abatements as presented.
ABATEMENTS -
REAL ESTATE: APPROVED
Lorraine Goers
#10-00400-011-56
Eagan, City of
Donald Geehan
#10-22750-200-02
Eagan, City of
Donald Jeffries
#10-25800-070-03
Eacan, City of
Bill Wernersvach
#10-56150-031-02
Eagan, City of
July 27, 1988
The house is not occupied ar.d is boarded up.
The estimated market value should be reduced
from $59,800 to $34,300. The assessed value
should be reduced from $16,744 to $9,604.
Owner received a market value increase on their
townhouse that was not warranted for 1987. The
estimated market value should be reduced from
$85,300 to $77,500. The assessed value should
be reduced from $17,84 to $14,125.
Upon further review found the property was
incorrectly valued as one and a half story
whEn in fact it should have been a split level.
The estimated market value should be"reduced
from $113,900 to $94,700. The assessed value
should be reduced from $23,953 to $18,769.
Upon review of the property it was found that
the square footage had been incorrectly calculated
in a previous appraisal. The estimated market
value should be reduced from $61,200 to $59,800
for 1986. The assessed value should be reduced
from $17,136 to $16,744. The 1987 estimated
market value should be reduced from $67,900 to
$60,700. The assessed value should be reduced
from $19,012 to $16,956.
2 7
a'Dd'0
i
SIBLEY, LS DR.
/
Lorraine Goers
#10-00400-011-56
Eagan, City of
020-56
D _f A a. .
310
/7
Frc
P
--N89°41 55.10e573 .5--, ,''a --'
3 ;� >I1!..�5 5 '0 6
J � J
0^ 9t C 9O r t� 1' -f�qNcl-
T�S•E
STIC4 HJLLS'°UR.'' ''' .4 •�"',1
9210 9210 663 414.
_ o
•12 11 10 iN W
° 3 5' •�9POT101VA9 a" lgj
C 0
k?,--- .,�ti 5- - - 8 a75 .892 ad-- c
142 80 + 148 09' xi 92.10 ' 92 10 92 10 _ 95.52 ,.'2 172.79
./1• 3°! 2•
L
2.00
Donald Geehan
#10-22750-200-02
Eagan, City of
•
•
•
032-56
0 0
200
3 go
QJ
t
11s ��'•
14T04
4.
rwso
394f f'
0401 9!
fi l/ 601.0:
4 7664 642 ` � 4 `
98,0 y1 i �
s f
94.
"85""‘‘‘..‘
= -
' 14 ACI-- :.,.., p0 'ADM O
,po
9p
+De'
;�.:.:,.• AREA W
2. E
.170
u i 1p2
O0
rnersv acts
6i11 We 0 -p31 -p2
j X0,561 City of
Eagan!
1•' 4.1i
j.•" •;7t 08 f0f t4,, 1
i`O'+i 2, j7T
.'to,CM fp4110,u
te2• s, -.
16f��2
209
44747!!
coU oAR
—�zns
w
gr';'?
M t/yp1501
y9t 75
\'1
101145 424 A0 t
\�
,.,4 rs M robt'iYw
z1tu
:4 Me`bY 12eft. os
u208 x5 !77+
to b
11822 ,9•E
535.54
M1
t
tf+2t N t
140
Donald O pyo 03
#10-238City of
Ea9av''
li
qt.
-
Agenda Information Memo
August 2, 1988, City Council Meeting
DEPARTMENT HEAD BUSINESS
A. POLICE DEPARTMENT:
Item 1. DNR 1988 Deer Population Control/Special Hunt --The City
has received a request from the Minnesota Department of Natural
Resources to participate in a deer population control program
similar to previous years. The DNR is requesting a special shot
gun hunt on two (2) weekends, November 5 and 6, 12 and 13, an
archery hunt from November 14 - December 31 and sharp shooting
fro?January - March, 1989. Referenced on pages through
is a copy of the DNR letter from Mr. John Parker, area
wildlife manager, and the detailed proposal for the 1988
Minnesota Valley deer population control. The City Administrator
has asked that the Police Department review the proposal and
enclosed on page CI is a memo from Administrative Captain
Geagan that provides comments and a recommendation regarding 1988
deer reduction effort proposed by the DNR.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny
participation in the DNR deer reduction effort for all three
categories: archery hunt, special shot gun hunt and sharp
shooting.
1-\
�n�SnTATE OF
rzi\
DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES
PHONENO. (612) 445-9393 July 19, 1988
Area Wildlife Office
223 Holmes Street, Room 101
Shakopee, MN 55379
Mr. Tom Hedges
Eagan City Administrator
3830 Pilot Knob Road
Eagan, MN 55122
Dear Mr. Hedges:
FILE NO.
I am submitting the attached proposal for deer population control on
public lands in the Minnesota River Valley for approval of your City Council.
As usual, I am running late. We have to publish our Commissioner's Order very
shortly and we plan to accept applications for special hunts starting August
15. If possible, we need to have your decision as near August 1 as possible.
Please let me know as soon as possible when you think this matter may be
considered. We will have someone available for a meeting at any time. If you
have questions, please call me.
Thank you for consideration of this proposal.
Sincerel
on Parker
Area Wildlife Manager
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER
SOS
PROPOSAL FOR 1988 MINNESOTA VALLEY DEER POPULATION CONTROL
1. 1987 Deer Reduction Effort. We conducted 3 special hunts: archery,
shotgun, and muzzleloader. Deer harvest was as follows: Shotgun - 34,
Muzzleloader - 4, Archery (estimated from hunter survey and population
modelling) - 38. We believe that the early archery season dispersed and
conditioned the deer sufficiently to reduce the effectiveness of the shotgun
hunt. The muzzleloader hunt attracted only 8 applicants.
We did not do any deer removal with sharpshooters as proposed last year.
There was uncertainty about the population estimates due to the lack of an
aerial survey in 1987. We felt that it would be wiser to wait rather than
risk a serious overharvest.
We were unable to document the exact harvest by bowhunters because we did
not require them to register the deer at specific locations. We relied on a
mail survey of hunters which did not produce sufficient data.
2. Population Status and Goals. Our goal is to reduce the winter deer
population density to 15-25 per square mile between the I-35 bridge and the
Mississippi River. The estimated population in January 1988 as determined by
an aerial survey was 291, or 35 per square mile. This is one-half of the 1986
population. Population modelling leads us to believe that this apparent
reduction is due to 1. unusually high migration of deer into the valley in
1986 which made the winter population higher than normal, and 2. the removal
of 226 deer with hunting and sharpshooting in the winter of 1986-87.
Our deer population model indicates that despite the removal of 72 deer
in 1987, the population remains about the same this year. In addition, the
DNR survey of car -killed deer shows that the deer are producing a high number
of fawns this year due to the mild winter. This means we must take even more
deer to have an effect on their numbers next year.
Based on the latest data we project that we need to remove 222 deer in
1988 and 106 deer in 1989 to reduce the present winter population from 291 to
132 or 16 deer per square. From 1990 into the future we will have to remove
deer either with small annual hunts or with larger hunts and sharpshooting
every second or third year.
This year we improved the coverage of our aerial surveys with financial
assistance from the cities of Burnsville and Eagan. We counted 143 deer in
Eagan and 12 deer in Burnsville both excluding the river valley. Since we
don't see more than 75 % of the deer, we estimate the population wintering
outside the valley is about 200. We plan to continue these surveys so that
major movements into or out of the valley can be accounted for in our models.
3. 1988 Deer Removal Proposal.
a. Special Shotgun Hunt. Dates: November 5-6 and 12-13 (two weekends).
This is the same framework and regulations as in past years. Special
restrictions are attached. Number of hunters: a maximum of 100 They will be
distributed as follows: Ft. Snelling State Park (Mendota Heights and Eagan) -73
and Black Dog Unit of the Minnesota Valley Refuge (Burnsville)- 27. Hunters
will be required to attend a special orientation and training session to be
eligible for the hunt as in past years.
b. Archery Hunt. Dates: November 14 to December 31. Hunters: These
(,
will be admitted by special Refuge permits issued as they were last year. The
permits will be valid for all open units of the Refuge. Fort Snelling State
Park niay not be included if we feel that the harvest will be sufficient with
the shotgun hunt. The number of permittees will be unlimited as it was last
year. We did not have serious problems with great numbers of hunters last
year, and the numbers will probably be lower this year due to the late hunting
dates. Permittees will be required to personnally pick up the permit at the
Minnesota Valley Refuge Headquarters where they will receive an orientation
and special hunt instructions (including maps of the area) by Refuge
personnel. The Refuge may charge a small permit issuing fee if authorized.
Successful hunters will be required to register their deer at specific
locations so that we may accurately determine the number killed.
If a shotgun hunt is not authorized by all three cities there will be no
shotgun hunt. We would then propose to hold the archery hunt in the Fort
Snelling State Park and the Black Dog Unit for the entire season, September 17
through December 31, with the same permitting procedures.
c. Sharps ho of ink Dates: January through March 1989. Shooting will be
done only by DNR and US Fish & Wildlife Service law enforcement personnel as
in 198i3. They will attempt to take enough deer to reach the goal of 222. It '
is unlikely that the hunts will remove more than 100 deer. This activity will
be coordinated with local police as to times and locations. Deer taken will
be salvaged and donated to non-profit organizations for public purposes.
We request that each city approve or disapprove each of the options
presented. 1. To allow a 4 -day shotgun hunt followed by a 16 -day archery hunt.
2. To allow a 106 -day archery season if shotgun hunting is not possible. 3.
To allow DNR and Fish & Wildlife sharpshooters to shoot deer during January
through March.
STATE OF
DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES
PHONE NO.
1988 Minnesota Valley Special Firearms Deer Hunts
SPECIAL REGULATIONS
FILE NO.
Hunters may use shotguns with slugs, OR -•legal muzzle -loading rifles
Hunters are required to hunt from portable or temporary stands
elevated at least 5 feet above the ground.
Hunters may select any stand location in their assigned compartment.
Hunters are required to check in/out of assigned compartments through
designated access points. Refuge or State official will man the
access points throughout the day.
Hunters must keep their weapons cased and unloaded on way to/from hunt
stands.
Hunters must attend orientation/safety meeting conducted by DNR and
Fish & Wildlife Service.
Hunters must wear red/orange clothing above waist.
Hunt area will be posted with warning signs and patrolled by DNR and
Fish & Wildlife Service officials.
Hunters may be able to take two deer each (bonus deer area).
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER
police department
JAY M. BERTHE
Chief of Police
PATRICK J. GEAGAN
Administrative Captain
city of cogen KENNETH D.A
Operations Captain
3830 Pilot Knob Road
Eagan, Min lesota 55122
Phone: (612) 454-3900
July 25, 1988
TO: TOM HEDGES, CITY ADMINISTRATOR
FROM: PATRICK GEAGAN, CAPTAIN
SUBJECT: 1988 DEER REDUCTION EFFORT
VIC ELLISON
Mayor
THOMAS EGAN
DAVID K. GUSTAFSON
PAMELA McCREA
THEODORE WACHTER
Council Members
THOMAS HEDGES
City Administrator
EUGENE VAN OVERBEKE
City Clerk
On several occasions I have walked through the Minnesota
river bottom area with representatives from the Minnesota
Department of Natural Resources. They pointed out to me the
large amount of foilage that had been destroyed due to the
excessive deer feeding. D.N.R. officials indicated to me, at
the time, that they felt some types of foilage would not come
back due to overgrazing.
In researching Police Department records from December 1,
1987 to the present, six accidents involving deer have
occurred in the area of Sibley Memorial Highway. As a side
note, the total accidents with deer in the city for the same
period of time was fifty.
The Eagan Police Department Records do not reflect any
weapons or hunting complaints during the 1987 deer reduction
effort in the Sibley Memorial Highway area. In discussion
with the police officers who were working during that period
of time, they felt it was a very well run operation by D.N.R.
It is the Eagan Police Department's recommendation that the
Eagan City Council give consideration to the Minnesota
Department of Natural Resource's population control request
for 1988.
Patrick J. Geagan
Captain
PJG/lb
CC: Chief Berthe
THE LONE OAK TREE THE SYMBOL OF STRENGTH AND GROWTH IN OUR COMMUNITY
Agenda Information Memo
August 2, 1988, City Council Meeting
Item 2. Minnesota River Valley Deer Management Task Force --The
City has received a preliminary proposal from the DNR for the
consideration of a Minnesota River Valley Deer Management Task
Force. Enclosed on pages ,l through :1- is a copy for
your review.
The concept for a deer management task force was originated by
the City of Burnsville suggesting that their council will not
approve further deer hunts until the task force is formed and
makes recommendations to their council. Apparently, the
Burnsville City Council would like a task force to coordinate
deer management programs among the various cities in the lower
Minnesota River Valley and, in addition, address other inner city
wildlife management issues such as Canada goose control and other
types of wildlife.
The DNR is requesting that the cities of Burnsville, Eagan and
Mendota Heights respond to this proposal, therefore, the request
is on the agenda for Council consideration.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny
endorsement of a Minnesota River Valley Deer Management Task
Force according to guidelines prepared by the DNR.
SPECIAL NOTE: Mr. John Parker, DNR area wildlife manager, will
be present at the meeting to answer questions by the City Council.
0
07/19/88
PRELIMINARY PROPOSAL
MINNESOTA RIVER VALLEY DEER MANAGEMENT TASK FORCE
JUSTIFICATION: 1. The Burnsville City Council has requested that a citizen's
task force on deer management be instituted by wildlife management
authorities. Before approving DNR deer hunts and/or sharpshooting this year,
the Council has asked DNR to prepare a proposal for the task force and take
steps to begin implementing it. The Council will not approve further deer
hunts until the task force makes recommendations to the Council. 2. This
task force may be instrumental in coordinating deer management programs among
the many cities in the lower Minnesota River Valley. To date, wildlife
management agencies have been unable to many cities with deer problems
crossing city boundaries to work together for comprehensive solutions.
3. Such a task force could be utilized to address other inter -city wildlife
management issues in the Metro Region, such as Canada goose contol, by
modifying its membership to suit the issue.
TASK FORCE GOALS: 1. Identify the problems associated with deer populations
in the Valley. 2. Review past and proposed deer management by wildlife
agencies. 3. Review esisting and potential deer population control methods
and recommend methods to be used in the Valley. 4. Recommend desireable deer
population densities. 5. Recommend practical methods for implementing a
comprehensive deer management program in the lower Minnesota Valley.
Recommendations should include: a. agency, person or group in charge of
implementing the program, b. agencies responsible for financing the program,
c. institutional changes needed to implement such a program, such as city
ordinances or Minnesota statutes.
TASK FORCE MEMBERSHIP: The City of Burnsville has offered to provide a
"facilitator" for the task force. This person would provide a structure for
analyzing the problem and identifying solutions and could act as a moderator
or meeting leader. The group should have representatives of organizations
with interest in deer populations, citizens from each city involved, and
representatives from the natural resource managment agencies involved.
Organizations might include MN Deer Hunters Association, National Wildlife
Refuge Association, MN State Archery Association, Minnesota Bowhunters,
Animal Rights or "Humane" organizations, Other hunting and non -hunting
wildlife organizations, and Park and Trail user organizations. Natural
Resources agencies should include: US Fish & Wildlife Service, DNR Division of
Parks and Recreation, DNR Division of Fish & Wildlife, and Hennepin Parks.
Cities which should be invited to participate include: Burnsville, Eagan,
Mendota. Heights, Bloomington, and probably Eden Prairie, Savage, Shakopee,
Edina, and Chanhassen. This list has the potential for making a large task
force, possibly too large to be effective. I believe that cities should be
given the opportunity to participate as they see fit either by assigning staff
Agenda Information
C M
August 2, 1988, City Council Meeting
B. PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
Item 1. Park & Ride Site Telephone Service (35-E & Cliff Road)--
MnDot has recently awarded the contract to expand the existing
Park & Ride facility located at Cliff Road and 35-E. As a part
of this parking lot expansion and landscape improvements could be
the installation of a telephone station with the installation
costs of approximately $1,500 being assumed by MnDot if the City
will agree to pay the approximate $50-$60 per month service fee.
This was previously discussed with the City Council in February
of this year with the Council's direction to staff to determine
if MnDot or the MTC would assume the monthly service fee for this
phone. With the proposed opt -out proposal by Eagan, the MTC will
not commit to the expenditure of any additional funding in the
City. MnDot has indicated that they will pay for only the
installation costs and not the monthly service cost.
MnDot will offer to cover the installation costs only if it is
performed under the present parking lot expansion and landscaping
contract and only if the City will commit to the monthly service
cost.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve/reject a
commitment by the City of Eagan to assume the monthly service
fees associated with the installation of a telephone station at
the Park & Ride site at 35-E and Cliff Road.
(3
or advertising and selecting an unbiased citizen representative. The task
force :should probably be no larger than 8-10 people exclusive of agency
representatives. Hunting and shooting organization participation may be
coordinated though an existing organization, the Shooting Sports Task Force.
I will seek recommendations on Animal Rights/Humane group participation from
Richard Laybourn of Burnsville, and from mailing lists in the DNR
Headquarters.
IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE: I am requesting that comments on this proposal be
submitted to Jon Parker, DNR -Wildlife, 223 Holmes St., Shakopee MN 55379;
Phone (612) 445-9393. I would like comments by August 20 1988. I have been
tentatively soliciting members already, but I expect the full selection
process should be underway by Mid -September, 1988. I would like to have an
initial meeting sometime in September or October. Findings and
recommendations to the cities and agencies should be completed and
governmental review scheduled by the end of March, 1989. Approval of 1989
management plans must be gained by the end of May so that appropriate
regulations can be written for 1989 hunting seasons, if applicable.
PROPOSAL DISTRIBUTION: I am sending this preliminary proposal to the cities
of Burnsville, Eagan, and Mendota Heights today. After meeting with the
Burnsville City Council on July 25, and hopefully getting input from Eagan and
Mendota Heights, I will send a revised proposal to other Cities. I am also
sending this proposal to DNR -Metro Region Parks & Recreation, US Fish &
Wildlife Service - Minnesota Valley Refuge, and DNR -Section of Wildlife.
Prepared by: Jon Parker, DNR Area Wildlife Manager, Shakopee
Dated: July 19, 1988
Agenda Information Memo
August 2, 1988, City Council Meeting
PLUMBERS LICENSE
B. Plumbers License --There are three (3) plumbers licenses that
are in order for consideration. North Ridge Plumbing Company,
Nuebel Plumbing & Heating and Standard Plumbing & Applicance have
all complied with City Code provisions regarding the licensing of
plumbers.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve all three (3)
plumbers licenses as presented.
ELECTION JUDGES/PRIMARY ELECTION
C. Approve List of Election Judges for Primary Election --The
Primary Election is scheduled for September 13, 1988, and
according to election law, the City Council is required to ratify
the list of persons that have agreed to serve as election judges.
The City has contacted, in writing, all persons identified on the
attached pages )L0 through ( Approximately one-half of those
notified have confirmed that t.ey are able and willing to serve
as election judges while others are tentative and will hopefully
contact the City in the next week to two weeks of their
intentions. The City Clerk's office is requesting that the
entire list of election judges referenced as both confirmed and
tentative be approve for the primary election. This will allow
the City Clerk to provide official notification and begin
training sessions.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the
list of election judges for the primary election scheduled for
September 13, 1988.
Agenda Information Memo
August 2, 1988, City Council Meeting
CONSENT AGENDA
CONSENT AGENDA
There are twenty-one (21) items on the agenda referred to as
Consent Items requiring one (1) motion by the City Council. If
the City Council wishes to discuss any of the items in further
detail, those items should be removed from the Consent Agenda and
placed under Additional Items unless the discussion required is
brief.
PERSONNEL ITEMS
A. PERSONNEL ITEMS:
Item 1. Temporary Engineering Technician for Parks & Recreation
Department --The following item is for the Council's information.
In official action at the July 19, 1988, Eagan City Council
meeting, approval was given to the City Administrator authorizing
the hire of a temporary Engineering Technician for the Parks and
Recreation Department if that technician were scheduled to begin
work prior to the August 2, 1988, City Council meeting. The City
Administrator has authorized John Ranum for that position. Mr.
Ranum began work with the City on Thursday, July 28, 1988. Mr.
Ranum was chosen after interviews were held by Director of Parks
and Recreation Vraa and Park Planner/Landscape Architect
Sullivan.
There is no action required on this item.
Item 2. Seasonal Parks Maintenance Worker --Four seasonal park
maintenance employees are reaching the end of their employment.
Therefore, it is the intention of Superintendent of Parks
VonDeLinde to fill these positions with additional workers.
After interviews, it is his recommendation that Steven Erickson
be hired as a Seasonal Maintenance Worker for the Parks
Department. Further recommendations will come at future Council
meetings.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the hiring of
Steven Erickson as a Seasonal Maintenance Worker in the Parks
Department.
I'/
DEMOCRATS
Leo Amundson
Fran Bohn
Cathy Brost
Janice Merck
Cathy Caflisch
Evelyn Cota
Marte Dehlar
Edith Drake
James Driscoll
Jan Giefer
Al Jarvi
Helen Jarvi
Patricia Kaeder
Mary Kellner
Dorothy Lemay
Stella Lundquist
Dorothy Peterson
Donna Quinn
Pat Rask
Lorri Regan
Carolvenia Richardson
Emily Rodich
Martie Ruzicka
Sharon Scholler
Joan Uselmann
Geraldine Knutson
Eleanor Piepho
Judy Mundahl
Doug Nicolay
Carolyn Thurston
Pauline LeGendre
Orlean Garness
Lorraine Rieger
Kay Dodge
Anna Lou Arneson
Beatrice Cooper
Mildred J. Beck
Duane Petrie
Annette Heuer
PRIMARY
ELECTION JUDGES
SEPTEMBER 13,1988
CONFIRMED
REPUBL ICANS
Lois Agrimson
Judy Allen
Lynn Fieman
Irene Kreidberg
Sharon Astelford
Jenny Baker
Terri Berkness
Rena Blomberg
Gloria Czycalla
Ellen Engquist
Emily Medin
Patti Benjamin
Karen Factor
Adrienne Fox
Mildred Hartelben
Shawn Hunter
Marge Jacobs
Nancy Jarvi
Tracy Jones
Avis Kriebel
Lisa Laramee
Mary Jane LaRock
Phyllis Ligman
Zella Mirick
June Nelson
Sandra Nelson
Barbara Nuttall
Sue Olson
Lyle Severson
William Skar
Nancy Strom
Ruth Sydow
Arlene Sheldon
Laura Nichols
Molly Eider
Martha Ann Guetzlaff
Marie DesLauriers
Barb Edgerton
Carol Vihovde
Marie Lane
Doris Vogt
Laurel Graves
Nancy Hendren
Marilyn McNurlin
Aurelia Peterson
Marilyn Porter
Marilyn Legler
Ruth Lilley
INDEPENDENTS
Karen Flood
Suzanne Hoffma-i
Marilyn Holm
Muriel A. Baker
Ralph Barr
Jim Bartholomew
Nancy Bartosh
Nancy Benthke
Bonita Berg
Janet Billings
Joan Bohlig
Ramona Broman
Eleanor Bruce
Adeline Buehler
Kathy Buske
Brett Carlson
Sharon Carlson
Kris Cordell
Joy Droberg
Claire Duren
Carmen Ellingson
Darlene Formanack
Marguerite Friegang
Joanne George
Robert Gralton
Eleanor Grimmer
Ethel Groff
Merlyn Handley
Vivian Handley
Ilene Hazel
Marion Herdes
Scott Helgerson
Julia Harnbostel
Geraldine Hrimnak
Dorothy Hughes
Vivan Jackson
Christine Johnson
Elaine Jones
Christine Kapsos
June Ketcham
David Klefsaas
Kay Kilehmainen
Jan Kuehn
Carolyn Larson
Nancy Lee
Pearl Lemieux
Barbara Linert
Laura Lundberg
Brian Malloy
Bob Manning
Laura Marks
Barbara McCauley
Michele Mickelson
Judith Miller
Lorraine Mohelski
Theresa Nelson
Mark Olson
Sharon Orth
YK I MAK Y
ELECTION JUDGES
SEPTEMBER 13,1988
TENTATIVE
Harold Peterson
Rebecca Peterson
Aurelia Poppler
Mary Quenette
Carole Ryan
Barb Schreiner
Margaret Schreiner
Barbara Shields
Steve Skabart
Michele Skindelien
Jamie Sloboden
Ken Sonday
Mary Sterns
Anne Sullivan
Sharon Tenney
Mary Teske
Kris Thayer
Lynn Thompson
Marvel Thorne
Gerald Thrustin
Albert Tischler
Ruth Twomey
Evelyn Uss
Orrin VanLoon IV
Elinor Villelli
Tony Villelli
Irene Wachtler
Fred Walker
Helen Westenberg
Stan Westenberg
Charlotte Wolfgram
Betty Woody
James Yanta
Jena Zempel
Roseann Zinn
Donald Lane
Judy Peterson
Rita Dandurand
Agenda Information Memo
August 2, 1988, City Council Meeting
PROJ 545/RECEIVE REPORT/ORDER PUBLIC HEARING
D. Project 545, Receive Report/Order Public Hearing (Clearview
Addition - Streets) --Based on a petition submitted by affected
residents, the Council authorized the preparation of a
feasibility report for the installation of street improvements
within the Clearview Addition. This report has now been
completed and is being presented to the Council for review and
consideration of scheduling a formal public hearing.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To receive the feasibility
report for Project 545 (Clearview Addition - Streets) and
schedule a public hearing to be held on September 6, 1988.
PROJ 549/RECEIVE REPORT/ORDER PUBLIC HEARING
E. Project 549, Receive Report/Order Public Hearing (Stratford
Oaks - Sanitary and Storm Sewer) --Based on a petition submitted
by the developer of this subdivision, the Council authorized the
preparation of a feasibility report for the installation of storm
and sanitary sewer facilities to service this development located
in the southwest corner of Thomas Lake Road and Diffley Road.
This report has now been completed and is being presented to the
Council in consideration of scheduling a formal public hearing.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To receive the feasibility
report for Project 549 (Stratford Oaks - Sanitary and Storm
Sewer) and schedule the public hearing to be held on September 6,
1988.
PROJ 550A/RECEIVE REPORT/APPROVE PLANS/AD FOR BIDS
F. PROJECT 550A, CONTRACT 88-29, RECEIVE REPORT/APPROVE
PLANS/AUTHORIZE AD FOR BIDS (WELL #13) --Based on a recommendation
of the Public Works Department, the Council authorized the
preparation of a preliminary engineering report and detailed
plans and specifications for the development of Well #13 proposed
to be located in the northeast corner of Cliff Road and Lake Park
Drive. This report is included on pages * through * for
the Council's information. Because this project is financed out
of the Utility Enterprise Fund, no public hearings are necessary.
In addition, detailed plans and specifications have been
completed in conformance to City standards to ensure
compatability with the Master Water Utility Plan and other
existing wells. The Public Works Director will be available to
review the details of these plans with the Council as
appropriate.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To receive the preliminary
engineering report for 550A and approve the plans for Contract
88-29 (Well #13) and authorize the advertisement for a bid
opening to be held at 10:30 a.m., August 26, 1988.
* The report was unavailable for Friday's packet and will b
included in the Additional Information packet on Monday.
Agenda Information Memo
August 2, 1988, City Council Meeting
PROJ 493/FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL
G. Project 493, Receive Final Assessment Roll/Order Public
Hearing (Greensboro 2nd Addition - Streets & Utilities) --The
installation of streets and utilities under the above -referenced
project has now been completed. All costs have been compiled and
the final assessment roll prepared. This roll is being presented
to the Council for consideration of scheduling a public hearing
to formally present these final costs to all affected property
owners.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To receive the final
assessment roll for Project 493 (Greensboro 2nd Addition -
Streets and Utilities) and schedule the public hearing to be held
on September 6, 1988.
PROJ 503/FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL
H. Project 503, Receive Final Assessment Roll/Order Public
Hearing (Windtree 8th Addition - Streets & Utilities) --The
installation of streets and utilities under the above -referenced
project has now been completed. All costs have been compiled and
the final assessment roll prepared. This roll is being presented
to the Council for consideration of scheduling a public hearing
to formally present these final costs to all affected property
owners.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To receive the final
assessment roll for Project 503 (Windtree 8th Addition - Streets
and Utilities) and schedule the public hearing to be held on
September 6, 1988.
FINAL PLAT/BLACKHAWK PONDS ADDITION
I. Approve Final Plat, Blackhawk Ponds Addition --The staff has
received an application for final plat approval for the Blackhawk
Ponds Addition located west of I -35E .etween Deerwood Drive and
Blackhawk Lake. Enclosed on page e is a copy of the final
plat which is in conformance to the concept approved with the
preliminary plat application. All final plat application
materials have been submitted, reviewed by staff and found to be
in order for favorable Council action.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the final plat
for the Blackhawk Ponds Addition and authorize the Mayor and City
Clerk to execute all related documents.
Agenda Information Memo
August 2, 1988, City Council Meeting
PROJ 486/FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL
J. Project 486, Receive Final Assessment Roll/Order Public
Hearing (EZ Air Park - Storm Sewer) --All costs associated with
the installation of storm sewer under this project have been
tabulated and the final assessment roll prepared in anticipation
of scheduling the final assessment hearing necessary to finance
this project.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To receive the final
assessment roll for Project 486 (EZ Air Park - Storm Sewer) and
schedule the final assessment hearing to be held September 6. 1988.
PROJ 492/FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL
K. Project 492, Receive Final Assessment Roll/Order Public
Hearing (Lone Oak 2nd Addition/O'Neil Drive - Water & Sanitary
Sewer) --All costs associated with the installation of water and
sanitary sewer under this project have been tabulated and the
final assessment roll prepared in anticipation of scheduling the
final assessment hearing necessary to finance this project.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To receive the final
assessment roll for Project 492 (Lone Oak 2nd Addition/O'Neil
Drive - Water & Sanitary Sewer) and schedule the final assessment
hearing to be held September 6, 1988
PROJ 502/FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL
L. Project 502, Receive Final Assessment Roll/Order Public
Hearing (R & B Addition - Storm Sewer Improvements) --A11 costs
associated with the installation of storm sewer improvements
under this project have been tabulated and the final assessment
roll prepared in anticipation of scheduling the final assessment
hearing necessary to finance this project.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To receive the final
assessment roll for Project 502 (R & B Addition) and schedule the
final assessment hearing to be held September 6, 1988
PROJECT 505/FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL
M. Project 505, Receive Final Assessment Roll/Order Public
Hearing (Country Hollow Addition - Trunk Storm & Sanitary
Sewer) --A11 costs associated with the installation of trunk storm
and sanitary sewer under this project have been tabulated and the
final assessment roll prepared in anticipation of scheduling the
final assessment hearing necessary to finance this project.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To receive the final
assessment roll for Project 505 (Country Hollow Addition - Trunk
Storm & Sanitary Sewer) and schedule the final assessment hearing
to be held September 6, 1988
f
...••••••
•••
1
I
C .
i
' ,‘,..,
.
1 V
1 % ‘
ts .4
•••• ., r
17, •70,... 4 r. ' ....4;4
1, ., * • c.,,, s.,;,..; t.1 ,,., , ..t,
%It : ''' ; I *.-.*.:.• 't 1 ‘ \ V%
A , ,
40, ‘
t% ' z 1 *- .4. - • • 1.* :
. .t.
...-1* a• •''' ' ,
..:‘ % .....' •
: TI t•Itx
; Nt ... 0 4. ......
........ r .......... , .•
........ , .
-41,-.. 4 ,..0 ,.. -: .. .0
..".. .44 • f ....
k'...,....-, es': ......t ... r,•:•.,
•• ‘11•••::. .....
• ..; ...!.. Z1 •••!'
•,.. f
V•4 '
1. _ .. t : : _ .. .. .. .. .. .... . ..,.. ,..; ; : I „ : ' . ; ' • 4 44: 1 -.:1::: ----c---v..----!---.-i:i‘P's. . _
',vt. •.... _ ,
'1- - :---m4-* 5„,1:!:", r •
:o.....,..:....,, _
,...,., ...e' 7 • ,... . 'I,
44. . ,4 ' .: //: •
4 ...; l'J ' • , It ;',! ':" „4,7:12)4 4 i'l 4. \\
'';;Z.: .....••;: W V 4 eff ,
/Si' ?„, i'•-••••",;:..
_.,. I
..
I. .... .,..,
-
•
C•6 ZZ - •
. ,....
, -....-.. i
1,
el ..z.1%)
....•
4..so:, ...9i.,,
%.„ .,
"....,., ...
......... ....‘ti,,,
.,_ '
1 ‘
'' • t /
2 t .;4 '; .:6. V .
' ''' p.),.....-
4a; ..
,.... . .: : .
s % ,.. •;,
.11, " .
• ,
' "... ..,,. r
4"1"
.,
/- -•,...:•,4:4.:::::' • *.••
'7 ‘-' '-'''..... I.*. 'N'e:.•\1•_ 7:1. ,,.. "' t,4
- _ ........ _
: * t. *o•N - .- : -,, ,.,....., 1
C..." • ....... _•,,.
.1. • •& •,..• ,--,,,7, '4.44, i
, ..... - . ....,.... .• *
.... •ox
••••• _
00...Y•01 -4°
Agenda Information Memo
August 2, 1988, City Council Meeting
PROJECT 460E/FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL
N. Project 460B, Receive Final Assessment Roll/Order Public
Hearing (North Nicols Road - Street Improvements) --All costs
associated with the installation of streets under this project
have been tabulated and the final assessment roll prepared in
anticipation of scheduling the final assessment hearing necessary
to finance this project.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To receive the final
assessment roll for Project 460B (North Nicols Road - Street
Improvements) and schedule the final assessment hearing to be
held September 6, 1988
PROJECT 499/FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL
O. Project 499, Receive Final Assessment Roll/Order Public
Hearing (Chapel Hills Baptist Church - Streets) --All costs
associated with the installation of streets under this project
have been tabulated and the final assessment roll prepared in
anticipation of scheduling the final assessment hearing necessary
to finance this project.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To receive the final
assessment roll for Project 499 (Chapel Hills Baptist Church -
Streets) and schedule the final assessment hearing to be held
September 6, 1988
PROJECT 504/FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL
P. Project 504, Receive Final Assessment Roll/Order Public
Hearing (Whispering Woods 2nd Addition - Streets & Utilities) --
All costs associated with the installation of streets and
utilities under this project have been tabulated and the final
assessment roll prepared in anticipation of scheduling the final
assessment hearing necessary to finance this project.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To receive the final
assessment roll for Project 504 (Whispering Woods 2nd Addition -
Streets & Utilities) and schedule the final assessment hearing to
be held
September 6. 1988
d‘a
Agenda Information Memo
August 2, 1988, City Council Meeting
TRAFFIC SIGNAL MAINTENANCE AGMT/TARGET ENTRANCE
Q. Traffic Signal Maintenance Agreement No. 88-09 With Dakota
County (Target Entrance) --The City has been presented with the
above -referenced agreement by Dakota County at the request of the
City to provide maintenance services and expertise for the
traffic signal to be installed on Cliff Lake Road at the Target
entrance. Because this is the first signal to be installed on a
totally local street, the maintenance responsibility will be
entirely the City's. In reviewing this agreement, the City
Attorney has raised concerns regarding the requirement for the
City to provide liability insurance to County personnel who would
be performing maintenance services under this contractural
agreement. The City Attorney will be providing a recommendation
subject to his resolving this issue with the City's insurance
carrier and will be providing a verbal report at the
Council meeting.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve/continue
Traffic Signal Maintenance Agreement No. 88-09 with Dakota County
(Target entrance).
CONTRACT 88-24/APPROVE PLANS/AUTHORIZE BIDS
R. Contract 88-24, Approve Plans/Authorize Advertisement For
Bids (Lexington Reservoir) --The structural design of the
reservoir to be constructed near the intersection of Lexington
Avenue and Diffley Road has been completed by the firm of Orr-
Schelen-Mayeron & Associates (OSM) and is being presented to the
Council for review, approval and authorization to advertise for
competitive bid solicitation. The construction of this reservoir
:Ls being divided into three contracts: Structural tank design
and construction; architectural superstructure and landscaping;
and distribution/transmission water mains.
The City Attorney's office is assisting the Public Works and
Park's Department in pursuing title to this property from HUD.
The contract documents are written to allow 60 days between bid
opening and contract award.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the plans for
Contract 88-24 (Lexington Reservoir) and authorize the
advertisement for a bid opening to be held at 10:30 a.m., on
August 31, 1988.
a3
Agenda Information Memo
August 2, 1988, City Council Meeting
PROJ 542/RECEIVE REPORT/ORDER PUBLIC HEARING
S. Project 542, Receive Report/Order Public Hearing (Alden Pond
- Streets & Utilities) --Based on a petition submitted by the
developer of this proposed subdivision, the Council authorized he
preparation of a feasibility report which has now been completed
and is being presented to the Council for their review in
consideration of scheduling a formal public hearing.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To receive the feasibility
report for Project 542 (Alden Pond - Streets & Utilities) and
order a public hearing to be held on September 6, 1988.
CONTRACT 85-26/FINAL PAYMENT/ACCEPTANCE
T. Contract 85-26, Authorize Final Payment/Acceptance (Wells #8
& 9) --The staff has received a request for final payment from our
consulting engineering firm of Bonestroo, Rosene, Anderlik &
Associates (BRAA) along with a certification of compliance to
City approved plans and specifications for the installation of
deep wells #8 & 9 located in the Royal Oaks Addition. All final
inspections have been performed by representatives of the Public
Works Department and found to be in order for favorable Council
action for perpetual maintenance.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To authorize the 19th and
final payment to Bergerson-Caswell, Inc., in the amount of
$17,189.50 for Contract 85-26 (Wells #8 & 9) and authorize the
acceptance for perpetual maintenance subject to contractual
warranty provisions.
VACATION PETITION/ORDER PUBLIC HEARING/LOT 8 HILLTOP OF EAGAN
U. Receive Petition/Order Public Hearing (Lot 8, Hilltop of
Eagan Addition) --With the preliminary plat approval of the Berry
Addition located along Berry Ridge Road in the Hilltop
development, it was necessary to vacate the existing underlying
blanket drainage and utility easements of the original Hilltop of
Eagan plat in order for it to be replatted into the Berry
Addition providing for four single family houses adjacent to
Berry Ridge Road. The staff has received a petition and
application materials requesting the public hearing to proceed
with this vacation of public drainage and utility easements. It
would be appropriate for the Council to receive this petition and
schedule the formal public hearing.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To receive the petition to
vacate drainage and utility easements over Lot 8, Hilltop of
Eagan Addition, and order the public hearing to be held on
September 6, 1988.
Agenda Information Memo
August 2, 1988, City Council Meetin
PUBLIC HEARINGS
PROJ 541/TRUNK SANITARY & STORM SEWER EXTENSIONS
A. Project 541, Country Hollow 2nd Addition - Trunk Sanitary &
Storm Sewer Extensions --On July 5, the Council received the
feasibility report for the above -referenced project and scheduled
a public hearing to be held on August 2. Enclosed on pages �(o
through 3 is a copy of that feasibility report for the
Council's re erence during the public hearing presentation by the
City's consultant engineer on this project. All notices have
been published in the legal newspaper and sent to all potentially
affected property owners informing them of this public hearing.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To close the public
hearing and approve/deny Project 541 (Country Hollow 2nd Addition
- Trunk Storm and Sanitary Sewer Extensions) and if approved,
authorize the preparation of detailed plans and specifications.
0-5
Report for
Country Hollow 2nd Addition
Utility Improvements
Eagan, Minnesota
City Project No. 541
June, 1988
File No. 49463
Bonestroo
Rosene
AnderIlk &
Associates •
Erglneers i Architects
St. Paul. Minnesota
Bones t roo
Rosene
Anderlik &
Associates
Engineers & Architects
June 14, 1988
Honorable Mayor and Council
City of Eagan
3830 Pilot Knob Road
Eagan, MN 55122
Otto G. Bonestroo, PE.
Robert W. Rosene, P.E.
Joseph C Anderlik, PE
Bradford A. Lemberg, P.E
Richard E. Turner, P.E.
James C. Olson, P.E.
Glenn R Cook, P.E.
Thomas E. Noyes, PE.
Robert G. Schumcht, P.E.
Marvin L. Sorvala, P.E.
Re: Country Hollow 2nd Addition
Trunk Utility Improvements
Project No. 541
File No. 49463
Dear Mayor and Council:
Keith A. Gordon, P.E.
Richard W. Foster, P.E.
Donald C. Burgardt, PE.
Jerry A. Bourdon, P.E.
Mark A. Hanson, P.E.
Ted K. Field, PE.
Michael T Rautmann, PE
Robert R. Pfefferle, P.E.
David 0 Loskota, PE.
Thomas W Peterson, PE.
Michael C. Lynch, PE.
James R. Maland, PE.
Kenneth P. Anderson, PE
Keith A. Bachmann, PE
Mark R. Rolfs, PE
Robert C. Russek, A.I A.
Thomas E. Angus, P.E.
Howard A. Sanford, PE.
Charles A Erickson
Leo M. Pawelsky
Harlan M. Olson
Susan M Eberlm
Mark A Seip
Transmitted herewith is our report for Country Hollow 2nd Addition which
covers trunk sanitary sewer and storm sewer improvements and includes a pre-
liminary assessment roll.
We would be pleased to meet with the Council and other interested parties at a
mutually convenient time to discuss any aspect of this report.
Yours very truly,
BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES, INC.
Mark A. Hanson
MAH:li
Approved by:
Date:
RPT49463
I hereby certify that this report was prepared
by me or under my direct supervision and that
I am a duly Registered Professional Engineer
under the laws of the State ofinnesota.
Date:
ICc�n/J
v
ark A. Hanson
6.9,76/ Reg. No. /-1'60
De
artment of Pubicic
G -ZS 8 ,
2335 West Highway 36 • St. Paul, Minnesota 5513,1 612-636-4600
SCOPE: This project provides for the construction of trunk sanitary sewer and
storm sewer to serve Country Hollow 2nd Addition. Country Hollow 2nd Addition
is located immediately east of Country Hollow Addition and includes 30 platted
single family residential lots.
FEASIBILITY AND RECOMMENDATIONS: The project is feasible from an engineering
standpoint and is in accordance with objectives established in the Master San-
itary Sewer and Storm Sewer Plans. The project as outlined herein can best be
carried out as one contract. This report assumes all the grading will be done
by the developer prior to this project beginning.
DISCUSSION:
Sanitary Sewer - This project provides for the extension of a 12" trunk sani-
tary sewer along the west line of Country Hollow 2nd Addition as shown on the
attached drawing. The trunk sanitary sewer will be extended to the north line
of Country Hollow 2nd Addition to serve future developments to the north.
Country Hollow 2nd Addition will be served internally by lateral sanitary
sewer extended from Country Hollow Addition. It is assumed all lateral sani-
tary sewer serving Country Hollow 2nd Addition will be constructed privately
by the developer.
Storm Sewer - Country Hollow 2nd Addition drains to Pond JP -25 which is loca-
ted in its center. To provide the required storage Pond JP -25 has to be sep-
arated into three ponding areas with three different high water levels. Pond
JP -25 will drain southwesterly into Pond JP -26.2 located in Country Hollow Ad-
dition bypassing Pond JP -26.3. Pond JP -26.3 is being bypassed because it is
not a part of Country Hollow 2nd Addition and cannot be developed at this
time. In addition, it is also anticipated Pond JP -26.3 will ultimately have a
higher normal water level than Pond JP -25.1, therefore, not allowing Pond
Page 1.
RPT49463
a9
AREA TO BE INCLUDED:
ASSESSMENT AREA
SE 1/4, SECTION 24
Parcel 011-75 (Country Hollow 2nd Addition)
Parcel 012-75
Parcel 012-76
Parcel 014-76
Parcel 017-76
CLARKSON PLACE
Lot 1, Block 1
Lot 2, Block 2
COST ESTIMATES: Detailed cost estimates are presented in Appendix A located
at the back of this report. A summary of these costs is as follows:
Sanitary Sewer $ 6,670
Storm Sewer 67,640
TOTAL $74,310
The total estimated project cost is $74,310 which includes contingencies
and all related overhead. Overhead costs are estimated at 30% and include
legal, engineering, administration and bond interest.
ASSESSMENTS: Assessments are proposed to be levied against the benefited
property. A preliminary assessment roll is included at the back of this re-
port in Appendix B. All lateral costs will be revised based on final costs.
The assessments will be spread over 5 years at an interest rate based upon the
bond sale financing this project.
SANITARY SEWER: The trunk sanitary sewer is proposed to be assessed at the
lateral benefit from trunk rate in accordance with the rates established in
the City of Eagan Fee Schedule. The assessable footage is based on the length
RPT49463
Page 3.
JP -25.1 to flow into Pond JP -26.3 by gravity. Listed below are the ponding
requirements for Pond JP -25.
Pond Normal High Storage Outflow
Description Water Level Water Level (Acre-feet) (Cu.Ft./Second
]?ond JP -25.1 814 820 3.6 1.28
Pond JP -25.2 814 826 15.5 1.3
Pond JP -25.3 823 832 3.4 0.5
Trunk storm sewer proposed herein is shown on the attached drawing and in-
cludes two separate storm sewer systems. The northeasterly storm sewer system
discharges into Pond JP -25.2 and extends northeasterly to the east line of
Country Hollow 2nd Addition. In addition, this storm sewer will ultimately
serve as the gravity as the outlet pipe for Pond JP -24. The southerly storm
sewer system will serve as the outlet to Pond JP -25.1 and will connect to the
existing storm sewer located at the east line of Country Hollow Addition which
ultimately discharges into Pond JP -26.2. A short portion of this storm sewer
southerly from the east -west street to the south line of Country Hollow 2nd
Addition will be sized to convey the increased runoff from the street low
;point with the intention to ultimately discharge into Pond JP -26.3 when it de-
velops. The proposed east -west storm sewer located on the south line of Coun-
try Hollow 2nd Addition will be sized to only convey the outflow from Pond
JP -25.1.
RPT49463
Page 2.
a�
of sewer constructed. Trunk area sanitary sewer was previously assessed as
part of Project No. 505 Country Hollow.
STORM SEWER: Storm sewer proposed herein is considered trunk except for the
oversizing required for collection of direct runoff. The trunk storm sewer
cost was determined based on a 12" equivalent storm sewer pipe for the entire
length of storm sewer constructed. The lateral storm sewer cost to be as-
sessed was determined by subtracting the trunk storm sewer cost from the total
storm sewer cost. The lateral storm sewer cost is proposed to be assessed to
the benefited drainage area shown on the attached drawing. Trunk area storm
sewer is also proposed to be assessed to those parcels not previously assessed
which benefit from this project.
TRUNK RATES: Trunk utility rates proposed to be assessed as part of this
project are listed below:
Sanitary Sewer - Lateral Benefit from Trunk $31.70/Centerline Foot
Storm Sewer - Trunk Area Commercial & Industrial $0.083/Square Foot
REVENUE: Revenue sources to cover the cost of this project are as follows:
Project Cost Revenue
SANITARY SEWER
Trunk
Lateral Benefit from Trunk
STORM SEWER
Trunk
Lateral Assessment
Trunk Area
TOTAL BALANCE
RPT49463
$ 6,670
$ 6,670
$67,640
$67,640
$ 2,314
$ 2,314
$25,990
43,171
$69,161
Page 4.
-$4,356
+$1,521
-$2,835
The estimated project deficit is $2,835 which will be the responsibility
of the trunk sanitary sewar End storm sewer fund.
PROJECT SCHEDULE
Present Feasibility Report July 5, 1988
Public Hearing August 2, 1988
Approve Plans and Specifications September 6, 1988
Open Bids/Award Contract October 4, 1988
Complete Construction October 31, 1988
Assessment Hearing Spring, 1989
First Payment Due with Real Estate Taxes 1990
Rl?T49463
Page 5.
APPENDIX A
PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE
COUNTRY HOLLOW 2ND ADDITION
TRUNK UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS
PROJECT NO. 541
I. SANITARY SEWER
80 Lin.ft. 12" PVC Sanitary Sewer @ $26.00/lin.ft. $ 2,080
1 Each Std. 4' dia. MH w/cstg. @ $1,200.00/each 1,200
1 Each Connect to existing MH @ $600.00/each 600
100 Cu.yds. Rock stabilization below pipe @ $10.00/lin.ft. 1,000
Total $ 4,880
+5Z Contingencies 250
$ 5,130
+302 Legal, Engrng., Admin. & Bond Interest 1,540
TOTAL SANITARY SEWER $ 6,670
II. STORM SEWER
30 Lin.ft. 30" RCP Storm sewer @ $40.00/lin.ft. $ 1,200
240 Lin.ft. 24" RCP Storm sewer @ $38.00/lin.ft. 9,120
245 Lin.ft. 21" RCP Storm sewer @ $36.00/lin.ft. 8,820
150 Lin.ft. 18" RCP Storm sewer @ $24.00/lin.ft. 3,600
550 Lin.ft. 15" RCP Storm sewer @ $22.00/lin.ft. 12,100
9 Each STd. 4' dia. MH w/cstg. @ $1,000.00/each 9,000
1 Each 30" RCP Flared end w/trash guard @ $1,200.00/each 1,200
1 Each 15" RCP Flared end w/trach guard @ $600.00/each 600
1 Each Connect RCP storm sewer to existing MH @ $500.00/each 500
8 Cu.yds. Rock rip rap @ $50.00/cu.yd. 400
1,215 Lin.ft. Mechanical trench compaction @ $1.00/lin.ft. 1,215
1.2 Acres Seed w/mulch & fertilizer @ $1,500.00/acre 1,800
Total $49,555
+52 Contingencies 2,475
$52,030
+302 Legal, Engrng., Admin. & Bond Interest 15,610
TOTAL STORM SEWER $67,640
RPT49463
Page 6.
33
APPENDIX B
PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL
COUNTRY HOLLOW 2ND ADDITION
TRUNK UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS
PROJECT NO. 541
I. SANITARY SEWER - Lateral Benefit
Parcel Assessable Total
Description Footage Rate/F.F. Assessment
Parcel 011-75 73 $31.70 (1) $ 2,314.10
(Country Hollow 2nd Addition)
II. STORM SEWER
A.) Trunk Area
Parcel Area Credit Assessable EILL21 Total
Description (Sq.ft.) (Sq.ft.) Area (Sq.ft.) Sq.ft. Assessment
SE 1/4, SECTION 24
Parcel 012-76
:Parcel 014-76
:Parcel 017-76
CLARKSON PLACE
Lot 1, Block 1
Lot 2, Block 1
B.) Lateral
130,500
91,910
128,940
87,340
81,460
Parcel Benefited
Description Area (Ac.)
SE 1/4, SECTION 24
Parcel 011-75 (Country Hollow
2nd Addition)
Parcel 012-75
Parcel 012-76
Parcel 014-76
Parcel 017-76
CLARKSON PLACE
Lot 1, Block 1
Lot 2, Block 1
7.2
3.5
2.6
1.7
2.4
1.6
1.8
20.8
130,500
91,910
128,940
87,340
81,460
$0.083 (1)
0.083
0.083
$0.083
0.083
Rate/Ac.
$1,250
1,250
1,250
1,250
1,250
$1,250
1,250
(1) Trunk assessment rate presented in City of Eagan Fee Schedule.
Rl?T49463
Page 7.
3'F
$10,831
7,628
10,702
$ 7,249
6,761
$43,171
Total
Assessment
$ 8,997
4,373
3,249
2,124
2,999
$ 1,999
2,249
$25,990
SUMMARY
PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL
COUNTRY HOLLOW 2ND ADDITION
TRUNK UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS
PROJECT NO. 541
Parcel Sanitary Storm Sewer Total
Description Sewer Trunk Lateral Assessment
SE 1/4, SECTION 24
Parcel 011-75 (Country
Hollow 2nd Addn.) $ 2,314
Parcel 012-75 ---
Parcel 012-76
Parcel 014-76
Parcel 017-76
CLARKSON PLACE
Lot 1, Block 1
Lot 2, Block 1
$ 2,314
$10,831
7,628
10,702
$ 7,249
6,761
$43,171
COUNTRY HOLLOW 2ND ADDITION
$ 8,997
4,373
3,249
2,124
2,999
$ 1,999
2,249
$25,990
$11,311
4,373
14,080
9,752
13,701
$ 9,248
9,010
$71,475
Total
Lot Description No. of Lots Cost/Lot Assessment
Lot 1-4, Block 1 4 $353 $ 1,414
Lot 1-17, Block 2 17 353 6,009
Lot 1-9, Block 3 9 353 3,182
Outlot A, Block 1 1 353 353
Outlot B, Block 1 1 353 353
32 $11,311
RPT49463
Page 8.
EX. 12" SANITARY SEWER
012 -75
e SANITARY SEWER
DIFFLEY
8
f COUNTRY HOLLOW 2ND ADDITION
SANITARY SEWER
PROJECT NO. 541
EAGAN MINNESOTA
1
3b
ROAD
012-76
017-76
0/6-76
0/5-76
014-76
Scale
0 200 400
6
j/11 Bones troo
JY
Rosette
us poslui Andertlk b
Associates
Engineers 1 Architects
St. Paid. M.nneeeta
f Dote: JUNE , 1988
Comm. 49463
Fig. No.
—2
•
010-79
0/2-80
0/2-75
POND
FUTURE STOPM SEWER
LATERAL ASSESSMENT
AREA
la I.
*0
• t*4M
Tigte
HILa
JP'
253
\P24,
Orr /1.-4-, 49r
• •amor- :41,41 •
rL
%/01111m0
Ata an!
JPS:.
FUT URE PONDING AREA
r JP~26.3
TRUNK
AREA
BY OTHERS
0/2-76
ASS MLT
0/7-76
BY OTHERS
CLAR
PLAf,'
DIFFLEY
EX.30" STORM SEWER
8
ROAD
Scale
0 200 40d
6
i
ON
CCO
COUNTRY HOLLOW 2ND ADDITION
STORM SEWER
PROJECT NO. 541
EAGAN MINNESOTA
eonestroo
�-�■ Rosene
VIa Ander,*a
Associates
Dote: JUNE , 1988
Comm. 49463
Engineers a Ne+ew.cn
Et. Paul. Mar -...at.
Fig. No. 2
3`J
Agenda Information Memo
August 2, 1988, City Council Meeting
PARTIAL VACATION/CEDARVALE BOULEVARD
B. Partial Vacation of Right-of-Way, Cedarvale Boulevard (Upper
Midwest Management Corporation)--On July 5, the Council received
a petition requesting a vacation of a portion of excess public
right-of-way resulting from the turnback of old T.H. 13 right-of-
way which •i now referred to as Cedarvale Boulevard. Enclosed on
pagesis the description and location of the proposed
right-of-way requested to be vacated.
The purpose of the petition is to allow the expansion and
reconstruction of a parking lot on the north side of the
Cedarvale Shopping Center. If this parking lot expansion cannot
be accomplished through a resolution of the relocation of the
existing MTC Park & Ride Site and requested variances, the
applicant does not wish to pursue the vacation of this right-of-
way. Therefore, the discussion of the variances under another
agenda item will have to occur prior to or in conjunction with
this public hearing to address the issue of this proposed
vacation.
All notices have been published in the legal newspaper and sent
to all potentially affected utilities. As of this date, staff
has not received any objections to the proposed vacation with the
understanding that a drainage and utility easement remain for
that portion of excess right-of-way vacated.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To close the public
hearing and approve/deny the vacation of a portion of public
right-of-way for Cedarvale Boulevard as described.
3g
- SIGMA
SURVEYING SERVICES INC.
STREET VACATION DESCRIPTION
(part of Cedarvale Boulevard and Old Frontage Road to State Trunk Hwy. 13)
That part of Cedarvale Boulevard (old State Trunk Highway No. 13) and
the adjoining Frontage Road lying southeasterly thereof described as
follows:
Commencing at the northwest corner of. the Northeast Quarter
of Section 19, Township 27, Range 23, Dakota County, Minnesota;
thence S 0°24'35"E on an assumed bearing along the west line
thereof, a distance of 2018.74 feet to the tangent intersection
with the centerline of Old State Trunk Highway No. 13 right-of-way; thence
N 48°37'07" E along said centerline , a distance of 564.97 feet; thence
S 41°22'53" E, a distance of 83.50 feet to the point of beginning
of the land to be described; thence S 41°22'53" E, a distance of
69.00 feet; thence N 48°37'07" E along the southeasterly line of
said Frontage Road, a distance of 1218.81 feet; thence N 41°22'53" W,
a distance of 69.00 feet; thence S 48°37'07" W along.a line parallel
with and 50 feet southeasterly of the inplace Cedarvale Boulevard centerline,
a distance of 1218.81 feet to the point of beginning.
SHEET 1 of 2 SHEETS
3730 Pilot Knob Road
• Eagan, Minnesota 55122 • (612) 452 - 3077
69
,
iZT
0
SIGMA
SURVEYING SERVICES INC.
3730 Piot Knob Rood
E000n. Minnesota 55122
(612)452-3077
1.4
—STREET VACATION EXHIBIT —
p/o CEDARVALE BLVD.
and
Old FRONTAGE ROAD to S.T.H. 13
Eagan, Minnesota
N•11'ZI'S3•14
`- 69.00 -
`\_I`X \\‘1 NE l;..a of Cedarva!e S1,err;_. Cer.fer Prarerfy
M
evc
CEDARVALE DRIVE
„•,,NE n..
C
:.•,_, .USS
'l CZ�-71
„, ti
+.•'/ '. -'I's
", •11 .0
"1///11;11;1; I r.11 -t.1"
. SHEET 2 of 2 SHEETS
BEAU - D - RUE
Agenda Information Memo
August 2, 1988, City Council Meeting
OLD BUSINESS
COMPREHENSIVE GUIDE PLAN AMENDMENT & REZONING
LEXINGTON LAND COMPANY
A. Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment and Rezoning of R-3,
Planned Development District for Lexington Land Company --This
item appeared on the June 7 City Council agenda and after
deliberation, there were two (2) motions approved. The first
motion reads as follows: "Egan moved, Ellison seconded, the
motion to continue the comprehensive guide plan amendment and
rezoning for the Lexington Land Company to allow a planned
development located south of the bulk mail facility to Lexington
Avenue to the first meeting agenda in August. Gustafson,
Ellison, Egan and McCrea voted in favor; Wachter voted against."
The second motion read as follows: "Ellison moved, McCrea
seconded, the motion to approve an unbinding resolution by the
Council stating that the Lexington Land Company property will be
developed as a use other than residential. This land will
probably be some type of industrial. All voted affirmatively."
The Planning Department contacted the Developer and has informed
him that the freeway zoning procedure is still being worked on
and has suggested this item be continued until the September 6,
1988, City Council meeting.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To continue the
comprehensive guide plan amendment for Lexington Land Company and
rezoning of 57 R-3 acres to a planned development district until
the September 6, 1988, City Council meeting.
SPECIAL NOTE: There were no attachments or information supplied
with this item given the request for continuance.
�1�
Agenda Information Memo
August 2, 1988, City Council Meeting
VARIANCE/CEDARVALE SHOPPING CENTER PARKING LOT EXPANSION
B. Variances for Parking Lot Expansion to Cedarvale Shopping
Center --At the request of the City staff and representatives of
the Cedarvale Shopping Center, the review of certain variance
applications for curb and gutter, parking spaces, setback and the
related are requested for continuance to the August 16 City
Council meeting. Both the Engineering and Planning Departments
are recommending that no variances be granted until Cedarvale
obtains the public property through a proper vacation. Cedarvale
is proposing that the MTC park and ride be relocated to another
area of the community which City staff and representatives of
Cedarvale are discussing with the MTC. City Councilmember
Gustafson has suggested various locations including the former
Brooks Superette adjacent to Nicols Road and those sites are a
part of the review by staff.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To continue the variance
for parking lot expansion for the Cedarvale Shopping Center until
the August 16, 1988, City Council meeting.
VARIANCE/BRIAN SKUNBERG
C. Variance for Brian Skunberg for a 4' Variance to the Rearyard
Setback at Lot 4, Block 3, Park Ridge 2nd Addition --At the July
19 City Council meeting, a variance application was considered
for Brian Skunberg for property located at 4739 Ridge Wind Trail.
Mr. Skunberg is requesting a six-foot variance to the required
15'rear yard setback for the purpose of completing an accessory
building.
Neighbors adjacent to Mr. Skunberg expressed a concern about the
structural reliability of a retaining wall that is located
adjacent to and providing support for the proposed storage
building. Mr. Skunberg and his neighbors were advised to consult
a landscape architect or reputable landscape contractor and
perform an analysis so there is some assurance to the neighbors
that the wall is safe and will not impact their property.
Please refer to the attached memo referenced as page �3
reviewing this item as prepared by the Planning Department.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny a 4'
variance to the rear yard setback for Brian Skunberg at Lot 4,
Block 3, Park Ridge 2nd Addition.
MEMO TO: DALE RUNKLE, CITY PLANNER
FROM: SHANNON WILLEY, ZONING ADMINISTRATOR
DATE: JULY 28, 1988
SUBJECT: VARIANCE FOR BRIAN SKUNBERG
This item was continued from the July 19, 1988 Council meeting to
the August 2, 1988 Council meeting. The continuance was granted
so Mr. Skunberg could hire an architect to determine if the
retaining wall will hold the existing concrete slab and
accessory structure erected on the slab.
The applicant has hired an architect and the architect will
inspect the wall on July 28, 1988. The item was continued so the
applicant could hire an architect for the inspection, which Mr.
Skunberg has done, and will present the architect's findings to
the City Council at the Council's August 2, 1988 meeting.
Shannon Willey, Z•;"ing Administrator
SW/tp
Agenda Information Memo
August 2, 1988, City Council Meeting
RECONSIDER CONDITION OF PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVAL/HOSFORD ADDN
D. Reconsider Condition of Preliminary Plat Approval (Hosford
lst Addition) --On April 19, 1988, the preliminary plat for the
proposed Hosford Addition was approved by Council action with a
list of conditions to be fulfilled prior to or concurrent with
final plat. processing. Enclosed on page 4/5' is a letter
received from Mrs. Hosford requesting discussion for
reconsideration of the requirement of Condition #1 regarding
additional assessment obligations. Enclosed on page qe, is
that portion of the staff's report processed with the preliminary
plat application identifying potential additional assessment
obligations associated with the subdivision of this 5 -acre
parcel.
During the processing of the final plat application, a detailed
review was performed of City policies and it was determined that
of the estimated $15,243 of additional financial obligation
listed in the staff's report, only the Storm Sewer Trunk for the
estimated 133,230 sq. ft. would be equired with this proposed
subdivision. Enclosed on pages 4 't'is a copy of the Waiver of
Hearing/Authorization For Special Assessment for the trunk area
storm sewer calculated on the actual square footage area provided
by the developer's surveyor.
Itwas explained to Mr. Hosford and his attorney that the
additional trunk area storm sewer obligation was not a special
assessment associated with Project 473 but rather a condition of
fianl plat approval with an option to have the obligation spread
as a special assessment subject to the execution of the
previously referenced Waiver of Hearing. This condition is
consistent with the City's policy that while only portions of
existing homesteaded Large Lots are assessed under trunk
improvements, subsequent subdivision of that property requires
additional contribution to help finance the Trunk Utility Fund
necessary to provide the ability for the development to subdivide
to a higher intensity.�
Enclosed on page p` is a topographic layout of the proposed
subdivision showing the various drainage patterns to minor
isolated drainage basins on adjacent properties. Although only a
small portion in the extreme southwest corner of the property
drains into the storm sewer installed under Project 473, the
proposed additional obligation for trunk storm sewer is
referenced to Project 473 only for financial cost accounting
purposes.
The Public Works Director will be available to provide additional
information or clarification as may be necessary.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To reaffirm/delete
Condition #1 for the proposed Hosford Addition.
LIA
27 2:33
os1=0,240 A bp VON
cs
j
ASSESSMENTS: The parcel proposed for development has fulfilled
its assessment obligations for sanitary sewer trunk and water
area trunk. The underlying parcel has only partially fulfilled
assessment obligations for the following: Lateral benefit trunk
water main, street Deerwood Driv , storm sewer lateral, and
sanitary sewer lateral.
The .underlying parcel has the following pending assessment of
record:
PROJ 4 DESCRIPTION RATE QUANTITY AMOUNT
473 Storm sewer trunk .05/sf 66,000 sf $3,300
TOTAL PENDING ASSESSMENT $3,300
The following assessments are proposed in accordance with City
Special Assessment Policy 482-1:
PROJ 4 DESCRIPTION
417 Lateral benefit sanitary
sewer
417 Lateral benefit water
main
417 Lateral benefit storm
sewer
417 Street
417 Storm sewer trunk
TOTAL PROPOSED ASSESSMENT
RATE QUANTITY AMOUNT
$15.85/ff 115.69 $1,834
6.55/ff 115.69 $ 758
20.83/ff 115.69 $2,410
24.03/ff 115.69 $2,780
.056/ff 133,230 $7,461
$15,243
All final assessment obligations will be calculated based on
final plat areas and dimensions and the rates in effect at the
time of final plat approval.
4(°
r1 -4,Q Lu
EXHIBIT B
0i1r r 1 ULv L, ur 1 vvu
1. This development shall accept its additional assessment
obligations as defined in the staff's report in accordance with the
final plat dimensions and the rates in effect at the time of final
plat approval.
2. This development shall dedicate 10 foot drainage and utility
easements centered over all common lot lines and adjacent to private
property or public right-of-way,
3. This development shall dedicate, provide, or financially
guarantee its proportionate share of the acquisition costs of
additional drainage, ponding, and utility easements as required by
the alignment, depth, and storage capacity of all required public
utilities and streets located beyond the boundaries of this plat or
outside Of dedicated public right-of-way -as necessary to service
this development.
4. This development shall dedicate all public right-of-way and
temporary slope easements for ultimate development of adjacent
roadways as required by the appropriate jurisdictional agency.
5. A11 public streets and utilities necessary to provide
service to this development shall be designed by a registered
professional engineer in accordance with City codes and engineering
standards and policies, and approved by staff prior to final plat
approval.
6. A detailed grading, drainage, erosion, and sediment control
plan must be prepared in accordance with current City standards and
approved by staff prior to final plat approval.
7. A11 internal public and private streets shall be constructed
within the required right-of-way in accordance with City design
standards.
8. If any public improvements are to be installed under a City
contract, the appropriate project must be approved by Council action
prior to final plat approval.
9. This development shall be responsible for the acquisition of
all regulatory agency permits in the time frame required by the
affected agency.
10. This development shall fulfill its parks dedication
requirements as recommended by the Advisory Parks and Recreation
Commission and approved by Council action.
11. A11 standard platting and zoning conditions shall be
adhered to unless specifically granted a variance by Council action.
12. The existing home shall change its address to reflect the
new cul-de-sac name.
EXHIBIT D
WAIVER OF HEARING
Special Assessment Authorization
I/We hereby request and authorize the City of Eagan, MN (Dakota
County) to assess the following described property owned by me/us:
Lots One (1) through Four (4), Block One (1), HOSFORD 1ST ADDITION,
to be assessed equally between four lots, $10,343.18 divided by four
equals $2,585.80 per lot, for the benefit received from the following
improvements:
ITEM QUANTITY
Trunk Area
Storm Sewer 66,000 SqFt
Trunk Area
Storm Sewer
RATE
PROJECT
AMOUNT NUMBER
Pending
0.05 $ 3,300.00 Under
Project
473
125,771 SqFt 0.56
S 7,043.18 473
TOTAL ,$ j Q.34a .18
to be spread over five (5) years at an annual interest rate of 9%
against any remaining unpaid balances.
The undersigned, for themselves, their heirs, executors,
administrators, successors and assigns, hereby consent to the levy of
these assessments, and further, hereby waive notice of any and all
hearings necessary, and waive objections to any technical defects in
any proceedings related to these assessments, and further waive the
right to object to or appeal from these assessments made pursuant to
this agreement.
DATED• JOHN AND KAREN RAA HOSFORD
STATE OF )
ss.
COUNTY OF j By:
By: ,l(' �' / ,`/, /t_i !�/
On this day of , 1988, before me a
Notary public within and for said County, personally appeared
to me personally known to be the person
�,9
HOSFORD ADDITION
1
N
/1-7) iJL1
1
OFFRW0n1'
°''
.I
4p
rt
- .7-.7 f7 '
_ ,7),..
1
` 1 \ / '/ • 11 Ill 1 / \ \ MW u.ouc ►u.
/f I 1 / 1 .arnaio rimer .u1ITIes
111 \
1
- ,
\N\ 1 L
\\ 11\\ 1111 1 1 r 1 /I1 `,— -, 1
/- ,n
-i % Iit
.
J✓
IIRIVE
— 70177 —
` f / 1/ — _ . MINIq Comma/
C -- / • trap.. Centimes
,♦ \ �I \s \\ 1 \\ / / 1
\\, Jli l,.\
.�\\\\\ I 1Ii JJ �=
\�\ 1 /
\ I`
\\�\\\\:::.‘ t�\\\11111 -t\ \\\�,ci C\r __
\ \\\\\\\ 1\1 1111011\1\I /p �.' ......1—
‘,.%
/ .o4
\\\o\I \\ 11 1111, �I (t, I %t •t\\p \, t ,- �t�
:� \\1\ t It 11 •1 ili•1 1\\ \\\1 w�.e.
,.\\‘‘;‘ 1\ ,,\„,,. 1Ill11111\►\C,\\`�\\
kI%'u
\11`11 \I\\\ \,\I, \ t 1 //
1u \1\11 '.. \1 ',11 % \' \`\\\\ \,\ I\
�\ \ \ r \\ \\\ \\♦•�[
J/ 1i \1 �\11� •611\ \` \\\�;\\:\��
- ', 11 111 1411\\\ \`'- -' .. \
J\ \\\\\ \ \` \ \\
- / ,4/ 11/,J 11 t \ \\ ` e' \ �\\\\\�
{141 111 1 I I 1 \ \ \\ \\ \
I 1 1 1 \, ,% % \\ \ \ \ \ , \ \\\ \
11 1 \ \ \.`\` \ \ `•`\\\
))j \ \\ \ \ S • ' \ \ \I
...1 , I 1 \�..\\\
Ida) • 1641 war est.
SLAV M•. ee.er.nt
• II.1...ad plr
posed Waw
WWI . p11t ..Rr
• . Creoles ce.Uel
1(Ke. Ides WIe.
• .4.11.
•w•• lor.os ars
e
pW.sed Ip.
has. IS .•eded1
•
pr.p,M OA -IS -OS
DISLOISSIe. 10.YS /MO
wmvtseme
MN/ Woe► /saws Tsai,
m....omrl• Mw. SIMM
4.YIAS
tdw$Z0 lo/-//
•
-w
F.
0
•
PRo r tl73-)7
`\\♦\r G 24117.-
•
\
a°1
Agenda Information Memo
August 2, 1988, City Council Meeting
NEW BUSINESS
CORRECTION/LAND SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE
BRIDLE RIDGE 1ST ADDITION
A. Correction, Land Surveyors Certificate for Bridle Ridge 1st
Addition --The James R. Hill, Inc., land surveyors, are requesting
on behalf of the Sienna Corporation a land surveyors certificate
of correction for the Bridle Ridge 1st Addition. There are
certain errors, omissions and defects in various property
description as described on the attached certificate referenced
as page St . The Director of Public Works/Engineering Division
has reviewed the certificate and finds the correction to be in
order for Council approval.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the
correction for a land surveyors certificate for Bridle Ridge 1st
Addition.
LAND SURVEYORS CERTIFICATE OF CORRECTION TO PLAT
Name of Plat: BRIDLE RIDGE 1ST ADDITION. Pursuant to the
provisions of Chapter 505.174 Laws of Minnesota, 1957 Harold C.
Peterson, the undersigned, a Registered Land Surveyor in and for
the State of Minnesota, declares as follows:
1. That I prepared the plat of BRIDLE RIDGE 1ST ADDITION
dated September 14, 1987 and filed on September 23, 1987 in the
office of County Recorder, Dakota County, Minnesota, in Book
Fourteen of Plats, page 27.
2. That said plat contains errors, omissions, or defects in -
the following particulars, to -wit:
The south line of Outlot L shows an incorrect distance of
841.03 feet along the curve.
Line 46 in the center column of sheet 1 of 7 sheets reads:
The North 660.00 feet of the West 300.00 feet of the East
Half of the.
Line 36 in the right column on sheet 1 of 7 sheets reads: 0
degrees 07 minutes 28 seconds East along said east line of
the East.
3. That said plat is hereby corrected in the following
particulars, to -wit:
The south line of Outlot L is 814.03 feet along the curve.
Line 46 in the center column is corrected to read: The North
660.00 feet of the West 330.00 feet of the East Half of the.
Line 36 in the right column is corrected to read: 0 degrees
07 minutes 28 seconds East along said west line of the East.
Dated Harold C. Peterson, Registered Land Surveyor
No. 12294, State of Minnesota
The above Certificate of Correction to the plat of BRIDLE RIDGE
1ST ADDITION has been approved by the City Council of Eagan at a
regular meeting of City Council of Eagan Minnesota held on the
day of , 19
Mayor Clerk
This Certificate of Correction has been checked and approved this
day of 19
By
Gary H. Stevenson, Dakota County Surveyor
Agenda Information Memo
August 2, 1988, City Council Meeting
SPECIAL PERMIT/TEMPORARY ADVERTISING SIGN
BOULDER RIDGE
B. Special Permit for New Horizon Homes to Allow a Temporary
Advertising Sign for Boulder Ridge --The Planning Department has
received a request for a special permit for a temporary
advertising sign from New Horizon Homes requesting that a sign,
4' x 4', with an approximate height of 7', be allowed at the
southeast corner of Thomas Lake Road and Cliff Road.
Refer to the Planninpartment report, a copy is enclosed on
pages 53 through
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the
special permit for New Horizon Homes to allow a temporary
advertising sign for Boulder Ridge, located at Cliff and Thomas
Lake Road.
CITY OF EAGAN
SUBJECT: SPECIAL PERMIT --TEMPORARY ADVERTISING
SIGN
APPLICANT: NEW HORIZON HOMES
LOCATION: SOUTHEAST CORNER OF LOT AT 1535 CLIFF
ROAD
EXISTING ZONING: A (Agricultural)
DATE OF°PUBLIC HEARING: AUGUST 2, 1988
DATE OF REPORT: JULY 26, 1988
REPORTED BY: PLANNING DEPARTMENT
APPLICATION SUMMARY
An application has been submitted requesting a special permit to
allow a temporary advertising sign for Boulder Ridge Addition.
The sign would be 4'0" x 4'0" (16 sq.ft.) and have an approximate
height no greater than 7'0".
If approved, the special permit shall be subject to the following
conditions:
1. A one-time fee of $2.50 per square foot shall be paid.
2. All other applicable city ordinances shall be adhered to.
Lo c„Ac---'t ,--�
THaMA5 LA�Q
PD,
.PARI(
774, •
.4,04: 1 ^
VII
THOMAS •�/�j:'
61i _
LAK . i ;rti �. r#,
I�t�l_t `A wl
53 ZOJ h JLi
Agenda Information Memo
August 2, 1988, City Council Meeting
VARIANCE/56 FOOT RADIO TOWER IN SIDE YARD
C. Variance for Tim Payne to Allow a 56' Radio Tower in Side
Yard --The Planning Department received an application from Tim
Payne to allow a 56' radio tower in the side yard located at Lot
6, Block 2, Brittany 5th Addition.
For additional information on this item, refer to the City
Planner's report, a copy is enclosed on pages S(Q through
A letter was received from Carl Tollefson regarding opposition to
the radio tower, stating inconsistency with the covenants and
other reasons.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny a
variance for Tim Payne to allow the 56' radio tower as presented.
5 S�
COM
atC1+
_ ,
(AGII�^ S`A.
„ vrtd►AL
CEM rim
LA
BERM' Pe
o -P/
TACOId1 _._
E
;r 1.
dPAi7K
rt- TF __ - ' ._
ARN
\--
L A-�
WO'
. RO
,r4
4-
v�
L.1.
gEErNER
CITY OF EAGAN
SUBJECT: VARIANCE
APPLICANT: TIMOTHY PAYNE
LOCATION: 4858 SHEFFIELD LANE
LOT 6, BLOCK 2, BRITTANY 5TH ADDITION
EXISTING ZONING: R-1 (SINGLE-FAMILY)
DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: AUGUST 2, 1988
DATE OF REPORT: JULY 26, 1988
REPORTED BY: PLANNING DEPARTMENT
APPLICATION SUMMARY
An application has been submitted by Timothy Payne requesting an
18.5' variance to the 37.5' height -limitation requirement in an
R-1 district.
Mr. Payne is a licensed amateur radio operator and would like to
place a 56' radio tower antenna next to his house in the side
yard. There are 30'-35' trees screening the side yard beginning
at the house setback line, and approximately 50' trees in the
side yard near the rear of the house. The majority of the rear
yard is heavily wooded and the slope is too steep to construct
the tower on.
The applicant has slelected the most feasible and well -screened
site on his lot to locate the antenna. The placement of the
tower/antenna would not impose on the drainage and utility
easement.
If approved, the variance shall be subject to the following
conditions.
1. The antenna shall be unclimbable by design for the first
eight feet or completely surrounded by a fence in excess of
three feet.
2. No lights, relectors, flashers, or other illumination devices
shall be permitted.
3. The tower shall be removed when the owner of the property
changes.
•
•
0
D9 ,
•
152 00
100 5,
t
ftibl ',P
42
o. •,►0010
040
5`l
i•
•
••
01•4
WWI4
4
48o-
41.10.
110' '411
mialimillw• '41
WOW
MOP. -411
44111
NION -4111
440
44W-
.44
=1ir=11I,I - It=lr 1rr (n-rrr-lri � svccrir
3
HEAVY DUTY
HBX
Fort-fe.avier Capacity
• Has same structural features as BX
• Up to 10 sq. ft. antenna capacity
(see specifications)
• Available to 56' in 8' sections
• This tower will hold larger antennas
and rotators than standard BX tower.
Top of HBX tower is a 10-3/16"
triangle
• Rotators easily installed
• Can be used with Concrete Base
Stubs or Hinged Concrete Base
(see tower accessories chart)
• Tower can be assembled on the
ground and hinged up or built ver-
tically, section upon section
• Physical properties and specifica-
tions available
• Compact Nested 56' Tower Pack-
age — takes only 2-1/2 sq. ft. floor
space
Copyright 1986 ROHN • All rights reserved.
Specifications Subject To Change Without Notice.
Tollefson Builders Inc.
c1%
as
JACKSON - SURVEYORS
REGISTERED UNDER LAWS OF STATE OF MINNESOTA
3616 EAST 55th STREET, MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55417
3urtupor's Ctrtifitatt
AO-rEpi.ta
727-3484
Scale: 1":30'
o : Iron
Or.11509
188-1
-Drainage & Utlity Easement
..--J--=Drainage
000.0 Existing Elev.
0
3o
/32.
1 HERESY CERTIFY THAT THE ABOVE IS A TRUE AND CORRECT PLAT OF A SURVEY OF
Lot 6,Block Z,Brittany 5th. Addition,
Dakota Caunty,Hinnesota.
22nd. March 1984
AS SURVEYED NY ME THIS DAY OF A D
Stems
F. C. JACKSON. MINNE - j' IBTRAT1oN. No. *S00
Proposed Garage Floor Elev.
Proposed First Floor Elev.
Proposed Easement Floor Elev.
SG\
Tolleson Builders, Inc.
12617 Fairgreen Avenue
Apple Valley, MN 55124
July 28, 1988
Ms. Shannon Willey
CITY OF EAGAN
P.O. Box 2119
3830 Pilot Knob Rd.
Eagan, MN 55121
Dear Ms. Willey
CUSTOM DESIGNED HOMES
Phone (61 2) 431-1100
Some time ago Tollefson Builders received a request from a Mr. Payne of
4858 Sheffield Lane,Eagan to have permission to construct a radio tower in
his yard. Since we are the developer of the sub -division Brittany in which
his home is located he would need our approval according to the covenants
of the area. These convenants are goverened by an Architectural Control
Committee.
It has been brought to our attention that Mr. Payne has put his request before
City Council for their approval.
Upon further information and our review of this information we have elected
to oppose the installation of this tower. Our reasons are the height of the
tower and his proposed location of the tower. Our covenants state that
all structures must also be in conjunction with the City of Eagan's regulations,
and we have been informed that the specifications of the tower are not within
the City standards. We therefore oppose the tower Mr. Payne is proposing.
Sincerely,
TOLLEFSON BUILDERS, INC.
Architectural Control Committee
Llao
Agenda Information Memo
August 2, 1988, City Council Meeting
WAIVER OF PLAT
LOTS 2 & 9, BLOCK 1. CINNAMON RIDGE TRAIL
D. Waiver of Plat for Zachman Brothers Construction Company,
Inc., to Allow Individual Ownership of Lots 2 & 9, Block 1,
Cinnamon Ridge Trail --An application for a waiver of plat was
submitted to the City by Zachman Brothers Construction Company,
Inc., for Lots 2 and 9, Block 1 of Cinnamon Ridge. The purpose
of the waiver of plat is to allow individual ownership.
F ori copy of the waiver of plat, refer to pages (0.:2_ through
(04
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the
waiver of plat for Lots 2 and 9, Block 1, Cinnamon Ridge as
presented.
Lftl
CITY OF EAGAN
SUBJECT: WAIVER OF PLAT
APPLICANT: ZACHMAN BROTHERS
LOCATION: LOTS 2 AND 9, BLOCK 1
CINNAMON RIDGE
EXISTING ZONING:
DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING:
DATE OF REPORT:
REPORTED BY:
APPLICATION SUMMARY
PD (PLANNED DEVELOPMENT)
AUGUST 2, 1988
JULY 25, 1988
PLANNING AND ENGINEERING DEPARTMENTS
An application has been submitted by Zachman
Construction Company, Inc. requesting Waiver of Plats
and 9, block 1 of Cinnamon Ridge. The purpose of the
to allow individual ownership.
Both duplexes have separate utilities and
setback requirements.
If approved, these Waivers
code requirements.
meet
Brothers
for lots 2
Waivers is
or exceed all
shall be subject to all
.4
applicable
4
._
0
teas, Inc.
8080 Wallace Road
A Prairie, Minnesota 55.344
•
(61.2) 934-4242
"3•:•7"'":'
r1�It1 r1�1111► - •
UIH FII-IC;ATE
OF
SURVEY
---""-:;;••!,i--...A:';;- Engineering ••-
•t -• + Land Surveying
• • Landscape Archltecture
• Planning
survey for:
Ztf-1L_14 ykA. P N 1s7YGc_r) S . Ni s' -r.
Job No. o23y
Bk. Pg.
VOA
Le�,VP� �� VJ p -r0 DoT ti ;
>r10 F S t.+�
/335---
--T
140Q1 f t41EST Co 2u EQ i t
of SAID LOTN
A' -'UtLD
6surUkI sr toe-JJE1z OF
• r..AmD LAT 2 •
33.5
SnurhEeLY LIMe of
SAID LOT 2
110 SZT K
J" LAL_I+ is 2_a
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS ISA TRUE AND CORRECT REPRESENTATION OF THE BOUNDARIES OF i ,47rf•7./4/EO
LE4d4 f.
CO ,QTY, INNESOTA.
7N
SURVEYED I3Y ME THIS 6 ` DAY OF v4 ,19 4523
RONALD L. K'• GER
STATE REGISTRATION NO. 14314
/oF
SURVEY FOR:
DESCRIBED AS:
0
Sin'cqor's Ccrtjicatc
Zaclunan Brothers
Lot 9, Block 1, CINNAMON RIDGE 6T11 ADDITION, City of
Eagan, Dakota County, Minnesota and reserving easements
of record.
•
/ . � •�
5
/
•
ha °0oP
�6a
<cf
tri
e
•
j/i6s- ii.' G •
40k, Ca
1 i t
:» i. / 1
0
CIRTI►ICATI Or LOCATIOR O►- SOIpI80
I hereby certify that on 5-//-eR5
I made a emr,sy of the location of the
building on the property described h
and that the location of said buildime in
correctly shown h
J D Lindgren. o. 14378
PROPOSED ELEVATIONS
Top of Foundation . 922.1
Garage Floor . 922. S
Basement Floor a �.•..� a • 9t.i.5
Approx. Sewer Service Elev.. us,J11
Proposed Elevations • O
Existing Elevations s_^
IDrolnoge Directions • •.:...e,
_Denotes Offset Stake • 0
SCALE: ! Inch•3Q Feet
BENCHMARKI
j MIN. SETBACK REOIREMENTS
Front — 20 House Side — Io
Rear — Geroge Side— tO
Agenda Information Memo
August 2, 1988, City Council Meeting
REZONING AND PRELIMINARY PLAT
GALAXIE CLIFF PLAZA
E. Rezoning and Preliminary Plat for Galaxie Cliff Plaza/Cliff
Plaza Partnership from Agricultural to a Planned Development
District --A public hearing was held by the Advisory Planning
Commission at their last regular meeting held on July 26, 1988,
to consider a Comprehensive Guide Plan amendment, rezoning and a
preliminary plat entitled Galaxie Cliff Addition as requested by
the Cliff Plaza Partnership. The Advisory Planning Commission is
recommending denial of the Comprehensive Guide Plan amendment and
rezoning.
For a copy of th Planning ngineering Department reports,
refer to pages through.
Fig a copy of the APC action on this item, refer to page(s)
For a copy of a letter to the City ouncil prepared by Thomas
Klein, refer to pages vlD through t
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the
Comprehensive Guide Plan amendment and rezoning from Agricultural
to a Planned Development District, the Galaxie Cliff Plaza
project as presented.
(,5
DATE
CITY OF EAGAN
SUBJECT: COMPREHENSIVE GUIDE PLAN AMENDMENT
REZONING
PRELIMINARY PLAT
(GALAXIE CLIFF ADDITION)
APPLICANT: CLIFF PLAZA PARTNERSHIP
LOCATION: NW 1/4 OF SECTION 32
EXISTING ZONING: A (AGRICULTURAL)
OF PUBLIC HEARING: JULY 26, 1988
DATE OF REPORT: JULY 18, 1988
REPORTED BY: PLANNING AND ENGINEERING
APPLICATION SUMMARY
DEPARTMENTS
Earlier this year, a plan was submitted to the City requesting a
Preliminary Plat and Rezoning to a planned development district
for the Galaxie Cliff Plaza Addition. After the initial concept
review by the Advisory Planning Commission and neighborhood
meetings, a revised submission taking into account the
neighborhood's concerns has been prepared for formal APC action.
The site area (25.36 acres) configuration and basic circulation
system remain the same; however, the applicant will purchase the
triangular Astleford roadside business -zoned parcel if the
planned development zoning is approved. That parcel would then
be platted along with this overall plan.
The total development (including the Astleford parcel) contains
161,439 gross square footage. Building sizes could not be
increased from this amount without approval by the City Council.
An Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) will not be necessary
since the total proposed building area is below the 300,000 sq.
ft. threshold. Approximately 850 parking stalls are required by
code and they have been provided.
The proposed uses are:
8,000
3,500
7,000
25, 000
43,639
20, 000
20,000
37,800
sq.
sq.
sq.
sq.
sq.
sq.
sq.
sq.
ft.
ft.
ft.
ft.
ft.
ft.
ft.
ft.
supportive retail use
restaurant
family -style, no liquor, sit-down restaurant
office building
health club
office building
office building
office building
(.1,co
GALAXIE CLIFF ADDITION
None of the buildings will be above two stories, or approximately
20'-30' including rooflines. This plan places the higher
intensity uses along the 35E off -ramp and along Cliff Road. Two
office buildings are shown along the Galaxie Cliff curve where
the original plan called for three buildings and a day-care
facility. Also, in this area a 50' buffer strip has been added
where no building or parking will occur. The intent is to retain
as much of the existing plant material in this area as possible
and to add more, especially in the southern area where the site
is open grassland. The applicant has submitted a conceptual
landscape plan that addresses these previously -stated concerns of
the neighborhood. The landscape architect will also help design
the detailed building and parking lot layout in an effort to be
as sensitive to the site as possible, as well as to the adjacent
single-family homes.
The proposed uses fall within the limited business zoning
category except for the 3,000 sq. ft. retail and fast-food
facility. A Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment will be necessary
for those uses even though they are only 7% of the projected
total development.
A11 building and parking setbacks meet code requirements and the
lot coverage is 7%; limited business zoning allows 20%. The
total impervious coverage is 46%; 54% of the site will be green
space.
The two-story office building on lot 1, block 1 (2.9 acres)
contains 25,000 sq. ft. and will be constructed of precast
decorative panels and large window areas. Detailed site plans
will be reviewed/approved by staff prior to the issuance of a
building permit. A11 street access drives must have 30' -wide
minimum width. The trash enclosure should be incorporated into
the building.
GRADING/DRAINAGE/EROSION CONTROL: The preliminary grading plan
submitted for review at this time proposes site grading of the
entire site except for the area around existing Pond AP -14, a
smaller pond located northeasterly of the existing pond and
opposite of Karis Way, and the area immediately adjacent to
Galaxie Avenue between Karis Way and Westwind Trail. The grading
plan proposes cut and fill areas ranging from 23' to 6',
respectively. There appears to be some nonconformity between the
proposed grading plan and the proposed concept plan submitted.
The preliminary grading and drainage plan shows grading and storm
sewer lineconstruction in areas which the concept plan shows
preserving of the existing vegetation.
The proposed conceptual drainage plan does not adequately address
site drainage needs. The drainage plan for the proposed
development is required to provide that all site drainage be
conveyed to Pond AP -14. Pond AP -14 has been designated as a
ponding area in the City of Eagan Comprehensive Storm Sewer Plan.
Pond AP -14's outlet was constructed under the Galaxie Avenue
project. There appears to be a ponding area proposed adjacent to
the I -35E right-of-way in the area of proposed Lot 1, Block 1.
No preliminary erosion and sediment control plan was submitted
for staff review and approval.
UTILITIES: Adequately sized sanitary sewer and water service to
serve the proposed development are readily available from the
existing facilities in Galaxie Avenue. An 8" sanitary sewer
service stub has been provided to the north property line of
Galaxie Avenue near its intersection with Westwind Trail. The
existing 8" sanitary sewer service stub provided is adequately
sized to serve the entire development. The preliminary utility
plan shows that the entire site will be served by a sanitary
sewer lateral connecting to the existing 8" sanitary sewer
service stub.
An 8" water main connection is provided to the property line
along Galaxie-Avenue at two locations to allow the water main to
be looped through the proposed site without disturbing the
surfacing of Galaxie Avenue. The preliminary utility plan should
be revised to show that the existing 8" water main stub near
Westwind Trail be utilized versus the proposed wet tapping of the
existing 20" water main along Galaxie Avenue. The proposed
connection to the water main in Galaxie Avenue would mean a cut
and patch in a recently constructed street. Water pressure in
this development for all but the highest sites will be greater
than 80 psi. Pressure reducing valves will be required for the
water systems in those buildings having a floor elevation lower
than 865.
Sanitary sewer and water main services are needed to be provided
off of proposed Circulation Drive utilities to provide for
future connections for future phases of this development and for
the abutting Astleford property (Parcel #011-27) to the west.
ST:MEETS/ACCESS/CIRCULATION: The development is proposing to
serve this site with public street access through the use of
proposed Circulation Drive. Circulation Drive is proposed to
connect to existing Galaxie Avenue in two locations. The
northerly location for the Galaxie Avenue location is
approximately 420'+/- south of the centerline of Cliff Road. The
southerly connection of Circulation Drive to Galaxie Avenue is
proposed opposite of Westwind Trail. The two proposed
Circulation Drive connections to Galaxie Avenue are proposed in
acceptable locations.
At the time of the platting of Fire Station #5, the issue of
providing an access point common to the Fire Station and the
proposed Galaxie/Cliff Plaza onto Galaxie Avenue in one location
was identified. At the time of platting of Fire Station #5, the
Council expressed concern about the safety of the existing old
Galaxie Avenue entrance onto new Galaxie Avenue. Council was
advised by staff at that time that when the land to the north
(proposed Galaxie Cliff Plaza) developed, the feasibility of a
new major access to the Fire Station would be examined at that
time. If a new access to the Fire Station could be provided
through the use of Circulation Drive, then the old access
location would just serve as a minor secondary driveway access to
the Fire Station. Access to the westerly adjacent Astleford
property (Parcel #011-27) is required from Circulation Drive.
The Astleford property will not be allowed to have public street
access through the use of the old Galaxie Avenue.
EASEMENTS/RIGHTS-OF-WAY/PERMITS: Easements in accordance with
City of Eagan standards will be required for all storm sewer,
sanitary sewer and water mains. It is proposed that Circulation
Drive be provided with a 70' wide right-of-way because of its
collector street status.
The Dakota County Plat Commiession has reviewed the preliminary
plat for the Galaxie Cliff Plaza. The County will not be
requiring any additional right-of-way for Cliff Road but will be
requiring the dedication of restricted access along the entire
frontage of Cliff Road.
Al]'_ regulatory agency permits shall be acquired within the
appropriate time frame as required by the affected agency.
ASSESSMENTS: City records show no pending assessments of record
and the following assessments are proposed as a condition of
final plat approval in accordance with Special Assessment
Policies in effect at this time:
PROJ # DESCRIPTION RATE QTY AMT
Water Availability Charge $2,015/ac 2.91 $5,864
316 Storm Sewer Trunk Upgrade .027/sf 125,900 3,399
TOTAL PROPOSED ASSESSMENT $9,263
Aj
All final assessment obligations will be calculated based on the
quantities and dimensions of the final plat and in accordance
with the rates in effect at the time of the final plat approval.
-1 o
GALAXIE CLIFF CONDITIONS:
1. These standard conditions of plat approval as adopted by
Council action on September 15, 1987 shall be complied with:
Al, B1, B2, B3, B4, Cl, C2, C3, C4, C5, D1, El, F1, and Gl.
2. A Planned Development Agreement shall be entered into for a
five-year period prior to Final Plat approval.
3. The proposed office building on lot 1, block 1 shall be
approved with detailed plans being reviewed by staff. All
other buildings shall be reviewed by both the Advisory
Planning Commission and the City Council.
4. No exterior trash enclosures shall be permitted except for
the restaurants.
5. All buildings will conform to the code ordinance amendments
approved by the City Council on July 5, 1988.
6. Shared parking will be used wherever possible to encourage
less disturbance to the land.
7. A 50', nonbuildable (building or parking) buffer strip shall
be placed along the Galaxie Avenue property line and along
the south side of the Astleford piece if it is required.
8. The building square footages shown shall not be increased.
9. Rooftop mechanical equipment shall not be visible from the
public street or 35E.
10. All signage shall be subject to the one-time sign fee of
$2.50 per square foot.
1:1. All site drainage is required to be conveyed to Pond AP -
14.
1:? .
The development is required to utilize the existing
water service stub provided to the site.
1:3. The development is required to provide street access,
water service, and sanitary sewer service to Parcel
#011-27.
14. The proposed internal street and all associated public
utility construction is required with the initial develop-
ment.
STANDARD CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL
A. Assessments
1. This development shall accept its additional assessment
obligations as defined in the staff's report in
accordance with the final plat dimensions and the rates
in effect at the time of final plat approval.
B. Easements and Rights -of -Way
1. This development shall dedicate 10' drainage and utility
easements centered over all common lot lines and adjacent
to private property or public right-of-way.
2. This development shall dedicate, provide, or financially
guarantee its proportionate share of the acquisition
costs of additional drainage, ponding, and utility
easements as required by the alignment, depth, and
storage capacity of all required public utilities and
streets located beyond the boundaries of this plat or
outside of dedicated public right-of-way as necessary to
service this development.
3. This development shall dedicate all public right-of-way
and temporary slope easements for ultimate development of
adjacent roadways as required by the appropriate
jurisdictional agency.
4. This development shall dedicate adequate drainage and
ponding easements to incorporate the required high water
elevation necessitated by City storm water storage volume
requirements.
C. Plans and Specifications
1. All public streets and utilities necessary to provide
service to this development shall be designed by a
registered professional engineer in accordance with City
codes and engineering standards and policies, and
approved by staff prior to final plat approval.
2. A detailed grading, drainage, erosion, and sediment
control plan must be prepared in accordance with current
City standards and approved by staff prior to final plat
approval.
3. This development shall insure that all temporary dead end
public streets shall have a cul-de-sac constructed in
accordance with City engineering standards.
4. A detailed landscape plan shall be submitted on the
proposed grading plan and approved by staff prior to the
final plat approval. The financial guarantee shall be
included in the Development Contract and not released
until one,year after tie date of installation.
STANDARD CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL
PAGE TWO
5. All internal public and private streets shall be
constructed within the required right-of-way in
accordance with City design standards.
D. Public Improvements
1. If any public improvements are to be installed under a
City contract, the appropriate project must be approved
by Council action prior to final plat approval.
E. Permits
1. This development shall be responsible for the acquisition
of all regulatory agency permits in the time frame
required by the affected agency.
F. Parks Dedication
1. This development shall fulfull its parks dedication
requirements as recommended by the Advisory Parks and
Recreation Commission and approved by Council action.
G. Other
1. All standard platting and zoning conditions shall be
adhered to unless specifically granted a variance by
Council action.
Advisory Planning Commission City Council
Approved: August 25, 1987 September 15, 1987
Revised:
LTS2
STANDARD
TRI -LAND COMPANIES
July 18, 1988
Mr. Dale Runkle
City Planner
3830 Pilot Knob Road
Eagan, MN 55122
Re: Galaxie Cliff Plaza -- Neighborhood Meeting
Dear Dale:
Towne Centre Professional Bldg.
Suite 202
1260 Yankee Doodle Road
Eagan, MN 55121
612-452-7850
Mary Winchester contacted me this morning to cancel the neighborhood
meeting which was scheduled for Wednesday, July 20. She stated that
due to vacation schedules and other conflicts she was having a
difficult time getting enough neighbors to respond to make the meeting
worthwhile.
Mrs. Winchester stated that she would simply pick up an APC packet
from the City which would contain the reductions of our plans and
any other pertinent data regarding this site. I did inform Mrs.
Winchester that should any of the neighbors wish to stop by the
Tri -Land offices to view the plans, they certainly were welcome.
Therefore, as Mrs. Winchester feels that copies of the reductions will
serve her needs, no neighborhood meeting has been scheduled and the
neighbors will simply be present at the APC meeting.
Please feel free to contact me should you have any questions.
ruly yours,
aro K. Swenson
sks
cc; William Soules
7/
{
0 211 1-• .6A DC.n AND 11 i
P484'
s Ifjt)vt; \-tj
r4,1.4'.1
•-=r
:i
Am_
5
.---i'l =
' - • el•11.4
r(
'P84'__ a" -r7:,--------\--,---=-" •-- . —.....,„_. _, . ....- .;.-_....1
......-----.._/_,... f-----,.. 1$ '-'----, <.;•./--"•-."..,...•---e.
e7w WAY?
401AiYO OJNIN (IMC
vu. nla / men • RMOS
/ ! /
4ttl,.-LYq lZAKTMY W..c
WNW =.061,5
PRELIMINARY UTILITY,
GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN
GALAXIE CLIFF ,PLAZA
y.;:r.
.7 7
CLIFF ROAD
••\ ` NEIGHBORHOOD
/
\\\ BUSINESS
\ I \ 2.8 ACRES I
\
f \
//
/// l /( _Y ((
11A3:E)
PARKs/ f
I LI//{
LIMITED BUSIN
10.4 ACRES
ESS
•
KARIS Ay
N
EXISTING RESIDENTIAL
r
t�
EXISTING
RESIDENTIAL
TRI LANO
SURVEYING
SERVICES
1.0 110001• 0010. 1111.1.111 •
GALAXIE CLIFF PLAZA
EAGAN.
MINNESOTA
1
CONCEPTUAL ZONING PLAN
r
TAUR
D
OFFICE
\ TENT
BASIN 1
V* -S L..; ay.
RETENTION
BASIN
B
OFFICE
va..
OFFICE
/
•
/.
•
I I /
IBJ ,pc_uD) U
G'+-+ol'r -rr cF—
riWitiet7
♦ ,.w x.[,.CC co.:
GALAXIE CLIFF PLAZA
EAGAN, MINNESOTA
a
•e, --
CONCEPTUAL PLANTING PLAN
EXISTIMG SINGLE F PAY Del'ACkAEC1 IRES‘Detil
t
C01
v;
y
Et.4eRh6 e 4-
FCT 1JTlAd-T
L\44T IIETEMDh
AgeN
�,...
Fotwr
1
I�
E-A TlldCv 66,04- errE7,JTtA .
1#41.1612- ILETSVTIONI
4b,rot.uudo survvvos to ow.
EXISTING SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED RESIDENTIAL
GALAXIE CLIFF PLAZA I
EACAN, MINNESOTA
SITE ANALYSIS
[-LIF" FLWD
50' BUFFER ZONE 1
e,aw�
re..�e.rs
EP
N
•
C
A___....7........w.______
„..,
aa________.
c......
Q�TNIIY'a Sam,T,1144
GALAXIE CLIFF PLAZA
EAGAN, MINNESOTA
CONCEPTUAL SITE PLAN
L
SITE PLAN
35 E
OFFICE BUILDING K
• rtou•—"•t.om
■•.••• •.r. ■••r t00.
..COL,
.
11-
t11
.1 Lan
P
CIRCULATION DRIVE
1.SECOND FLOOR PLAN
•I
INC. PK 6
1/1••. ,,••.
n 12•1[40,.1.n * rva•
[LIGHTING NOTES'
[MOW. IM101..1.
.eetzro m++v..ne •vonctA.
ent. uu,rrno
vr
Mot-, • e.a
ee
2,r.0...n
�v. ncw�a
TYPICAL PYLON SIGN
[FIRST FLOOR PLAN •...•. ••.•••
IBASEMENT • BELOW 5,000 S.F.
® _ d_iiEN NT:SIGNAOE _ r`
SIGN
I tNANY�IG
•••
SOUTH ELEVATION ••.•. • •.
Vanney
Associates
GALAXIE CLIFF PLAZA '
EA13AN,•• I• MINNESOTA
•
'CONCEPT PLAN
A2
i
_
ors. ,
[FIRST FLOOR PLAN •...•. ••.•••
IBASEMENT • BELOW 5,000 S.F.
® _ d_iiEN NT:SIGNAOE _ r`
SIGN
I tNANY�IG
•••
SOUTH ELEVATION ••.•. • •.
Vanney
Associates
GALAXIE CLIFF PLAZA '
EA13AN,•• I• MINNESOTA
•
'CONCEPT PLAN
A2
Vanney
Associates
GALAXIE CLIFF PLAZ
EAOAN. MINNESOTA
.CONCEPT PLAN
A-1
t 'C99VEO J U L 1 9 283
WATER AVAILABILITY CHARGE — 2.91 ACRES
/ / /
1i,
1\ .w
( \\(/ � r
>/.
%4» /'+% `, • /
j4
i ;
r _ 3 �'o,'
c-
R VB- Up�,RADE
*125,900 S.F.
STp�N► S�WE
•
, ii./...---,----
-%...---"
•�
//7 • ���_,�;�:.
•
/
t`,/ /iir%''Jia 'N.. x q///7j. ' 3 1t ,1-'
1/r / IL' --e_„:;„,_-,.L..-,:,',04, ',!
/// ' / = - • ...-i.,...%,....------.:
,/ ---•.mo-".„',..:2,„-....,--_,-.:----
---
s�
--------'- i /iii.^,
//,i;,
%j
%
-..J� r
/� '/�'• '.
12
.r .s••••- - •
�,/,, ..?.� .. :?,Y .•--,..::� ,cam I _ :.,,,
_ -...
......,, ,,
%/\s , ti '.\._\ :cam..9�:' /� , a„,...,,,:___,,,:
�fi/ .,,t 1! -_—;' •;F} r•��_ ��l t'�� �.,1,‘:‘:17( i
% i :._ -1 '4 t: / , ___ y ; ,.<:!”
iii �,�
/ 1.1 -� \, \I }� . 1 \ � ••."".•. `t`J r te/ 7:7-::::',:::.----*--
"" _.... / _'`= ;� • \ •/
li ago ` ,. r-- , \ iiI t �- •�� '`\ ,'1,•'\:..;„.
l• i
1�iii 111 J 2 f y� ....,,--:.,,,It
./.;?/,'"/".....-'....::::\\4/ `\ N, �`s t\ 1 \.\ ,r . ,,' ' j `t l r f (`Jir- \-Z: '~' : � ; �.� :y-
fr�.: �-"tea'\\4.'\:•:"\''
\ \ r 1 1 '''
/a` r 1 \•
0 ///t / 1 1 t• 11 �.. iii !� �J --Th,VA
i// r 1\ \ Pr o r 1 i ��
�iui%'%ri I py� �3� \ \t i 111\ i I1�✓� II\t / �� �-
1�� _
e tai 4/i , t 1 t 1 \ I! i•-'))--��, J ii. _ r-�".'' - .T..„ ".
//41,',/ 1 t /r / it/1 /, 1 r
/tr!r'1 /Y: \i tt//rte t III
tt,l /'.-�✓t 1It
i
ii // ,:,:y
:t,, t ' \Y. \ %t(1�:-:tt 1 1 1 rte:::_
,',,;.'.' •,
„. . 1% :
" . • j— ; / e,P1,
1
•••...-
. ��”
• .... ....: •••• ....* A..
r.`
G LpxtE '1
PREomu4 CRY
%IAR I
10'v
46.3/ 73.
D.
41, f
/ • ;.? r
._/
• ‘773.-:::{:
16" Ef:3241,9.0
MID MOM age, , L-
' Fr:
39.0/65.0
/,'C•\ •
'17 .
./
11611 (---`
t ,
CE'li>'k`i14_":
ELI
, 1,1
II 16"
(2729)32:5(58
11:__I 111.
/ 1'1111
37.7/6.0 -L-bRivER
rEsr 116 f
.---LCEN TER'
30.8/55.0_
12.5/56.0
75T/
T ;
58.
46 rr:'• -
8
J
2.9/ 82.0
I
4._17-.7E71
I
( ib -CE C L IF
- ADDITION
85.8 /
CD 86.0/ 95.07:
am am am
o
,7
4 M.G.
GROUND STORAGE
H. W. L. 1150
2.41
.NN1 kiL
f
25.8/ 33.0
DAKOTA COUNTY PARK
SUBJECT PARCEL
N
FIG 443
city of eagan
PUBLIC
WORKS
DEPARTMENT
WATER
MASTER PLAN
approved:
standard
plate # :
ss
‘‘V
•••• \
I !
"/ AP -19
930.6
24rr.
RE'
s4_,..:3:ifiritc,
AP -49 ,(
,l
;7--_.• L___,,,,___:,,,,4:+,,..7 881.7 <t,
115`<:11-- 889.(2,ar, \
- :>c--,-t-N`_.-0. --- -----7 I
;---7.-----: E-- r AP -25
<,.
-,-. . /
r Ck:M-.',ILIRCIAL 880.5
LF F
AP -50
5-!';2 K ' 1 I 886.0
4 .888.5
.. I; _ ____. 894.0 11-7---i-.--.
A -11----1.
II.__.,
. , I
AP -I3
' 908.2
'171--: 9/4.0
12- -2
• - • - "..'••••••••• • ••
kf'
1
AP-44
ITE31- I - 915.9
7 9/8.0
N ;
900.0. /
'"AP. -40
AP -1.1 912.1.
889.2/
8947 r
A P
i CLE
1'1‘
933.9
.9376
R fC'
•
ti C. ;11.4 : •
0
\ L.-
P-18
925.5 , 4,
,
93 /, Acc,zr
934.0
938.8
,
AP -16 .r'osC-:A4P-'48
A P • I 5::2.3'fi.
908.8 -;71;--Ell
e" •
-922.0 •
926;2
994026:05_, v/
AP -17
A- xx
E STA TES— <0
ft)
."1
4,1 I
•
1
APPLE VIA._zLEY
4.00•1111 IMOMMI •
.•••••
DA:‹) FA I couNrY
A-yy
SU BJ EC T PARCEL
al
FIG#I
city of eagan
PUBLIC
WORKS
DEPARTMENT
STORM SEWER
MASTER PLAN
approved:
standard
plate if:
strong sentiments 34 lonal
Lae devalormrn. r21/ home d1r2ct1y
ohis development, the....-eo7 reduding the aesthetin
appeal of ,11, propert-/ as a residencely nome
is a!eo dramticall-/ a-F..Feoted ty very iioh traffic
patt2rne y4hicn1.1 ic dayslop a !'"72.S_lt this
cievelopent. The net moac,..: on my hoine and .
property las teen a reduc-Oion ln -esidential value.
pro,Do:,:ed de.ve_opment
dalls For :-ezdnind to
lLmited dusines ano roadside
nct opposed rezoning cureht agrio_.1turai to
O;_isihess. speciied
oor;Iprehensiqe „1-;lan i:",or some Hc:/4ever,
rezonig :o OusinasE zohstitte
andoher -pgading of Ousiness .:r1si:-_y that L -mould
-.rom the
It is my desire to .-egfl.ain
: think :hat onanges
continue to Oe apprp,,ad Oy the droperty
ma,,, -find more appropriate uee aE a commeroial
oroprt/, see!,: approoria2 nsoonin,q
for my p!---cpart-y.
7.1eAse help me in reeo-tro a ohancle -F-om
ousiness to r,a7-adside Ooiness in the propc-sec
develoment
Agenda Information Memo
August 2, 1988, City Council Meeting
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT/YOCUM OIL COMPANY
F. Conditional Use Permit for Yocum Oil Company to Allow an
Automobile Service Station and Car Wash on Lot 5, Block 1, Thomas
Lake Center Addition --A public hearing was held by the Advisory
Planning Commission at their last regular meeting held on
Tuesday, July 26, 1988, to consider a conditional use permit to
allow an automobile service station/car wash facility with a
pylon sign located at the northeast intersection of Cliff Road
and Thomas Lake Drive in the Thomas Lake Shopping Center complex
as presented by Yocum Oil Company. The Advisory Planning
Commission is recommending approval.
For a copy of the Planning and Engineering Department report,
refer to pages through (O( .
For a copy of the APC minutes, refer to page(s)/O.)
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the
conditional use permit to allow an automobile service station/car
wash facility and pylon sign for Yocum Oil Company on Lot 5,
Block 1, Thomas Lake Center Addition.
G
CITY OF EAGAN
SUBJECT: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
APPLICANT: YOCUM OIL COMPANY
LOCATION: LOT 5, BLOCK 1, THOMAS LAKE CENTER ADD.
EXISTING ZONING: CSC (COMMUNITY SHOPPING CTR) WITHIN
BLACKHAWK PARK P.D.
DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: JULY 26, 1988
DATE OF REPORT: JULY 18, 1988
REPORTED BY: PLANNING & ENGINEERING DEPARTMENTS
APPLICATION SUMMARY
An application has been submitted requesting a Conditional Use
Permit to allow an automobile service station/car wash facility
with a pylon sign located at the northeast intersection of Cliff
Road and Thomas Lake Drive in the Thomas Lake Shopping Center
complex. In June 1986, the Council approved three pylon signs
for the shopping center with the understanding that there be no
further pylons without Council approval. This proposal is
requesting a free standing pylon sign at the street intersection,
as well as signage on the gas pump canopy. The pylon has 80
square feet of signage area with an undesignated height. The
maximum allowed by code is 27' with 125 square feet of signage
area. Also, the 30" tall lettering on the canopy must be reduced
to 20% of the facade area to meet code requirements.
Currently, there are curb cuts onto Thomas Center Drive and the
shopping center entrance. Both Planning and Engineering
Departments recommend keeping the existing curbing intact at the
northeast portion of the lot. This will allow for more parking
stalls and/or landscaped green areas. Code requires 24 parking
stalls for this facility and 30 nine foot wide ones have been
provided, including the 12 at the six gas. pump locations. The
stalls should be increased to a 10' width.
The building will be constructed with brick and it will have a
grey sign band area. No rooftop mechanical equipment is shown on
the elevations. A condition of the approval for the shopping
center required that the landscaping be installed along the
perimeter of the whole complex. Additional plant material should
be placed along the eastern property line. This can be
accomplished with the building permit application since all of
the perimeter landscaping was already approved.
ENGINEERING COMMENTS
Rough site grading was completed with the previous platting of
the Thomas Lake Center Development. The site plan proposes
conveying storm water runoff from the parking lot and pump aisle
area northerly in a bituminous swale between the gas pump islands
and the convenience store. The development is required to revise
the grading/drainage plan to eliminate directing storm water
runoff in the bituminous swales along the easterly and westerly
sides of the pump islands. Staff advises modifying the proposed
grading/drainage plan creating a high point running east to west
and directing storm water runoff northerly and southerly to the
curb lines and intercept this storm water runoff into an internal
storm sewer system. Parking lot grades are required to be at
least a 1% minimum.
With a proposed entrance from the easterly adjacent parking lot,
the entrance at the northeast corner to the proposed convenience
store car wash onto the shopping center entrance road will not be
a.Llowed. The proposed westerly entrance from Thomas Center Drive
will be required to be a concrete apron from the curb line to the
end radius of the curb return zone from Thomas Center Drive. The
development will be required to construct a similar concrete
apron at the northerly entrance from the shopping center entrance
road.
The Development is proposing 9' wide parking stalls where City
standards require a minimum of 10' in width.
ASSESSMENTS: A search of City records show the following pending
assessments of record:
PROJ # DESCRIPTION RATE QUANTITY AMOUNT
510 Storm Sewer Lateral .15/sf 10,720 $1,608
City special assessment policies in effect at this time show no
additional assessment obligations are due.
<cf.: 95/
CONDITIONS: YOCUM OIL
1. The trash enclosure shall be constructed of the same
materials as the building.
2. The canopy signage shall be limited to 20' of the canopy
facade area.
3. Only one access shall be allowed onto the shopping center
drive in.
4. All permanent parking stalls shall be 10' wide.
5. No rooftop mechanical equipment shall be visable from the
public streets.
6. No outside loudspeaker advertising or outside displays shall
be permitted.
7. Additional landscaping along the eastern property line shall
be required and approved prior to the issuance of a building
permit.
8. If any existing curbing is removed along the eastern property
line, a cross easement will be required.
9. The Development is required to revise the proposed site plan
to incorporate the following concerns:
a. Revise parking lot grades to a minimum 1%.
b. Revise drainage plan to eliminate proposed
bituminous swales along the easterly and westerly
sides of the pump islands.
c. Revise entrance drive widths into site to a 30'
width.
d. Construct concrete entrance aprons.
qs
'''' • """ II I
133•11.111.00,111111S
••• tr•rld
[ONI 'S.13311HOIllf lAtiVMVIWNOSItiliON1
rtios..•
00 110 ritioo.t 3141 am.' Hsvmavo ONV
••• ,.••••• •••
APIS 1/4211N3ANO0 1:13•3001011d
•
• 11
• . 0Y04 3)0111 SYY1OHJ.
% (.4 't-,• .
•
r4,
1
A
a
:: —4
. • I
.11
•
-
, .
•
•••••
.......gle4211,
1.311112 N161.104 ISIS
-0NI'S.L03111HOUV IA8VII1VM/NOSI8HOW
• •••• el"
V4•••••111 on 1.
••••1•1••• W.*
•••• ••.• ••••••••••••• 4.. r
r •••••••• W., ••••1•.II
•••14 1.1
--NMI il 4- WI 0 y 1
1 .
• • • . 6., - • ,:.
-0017110411130A1314.1. :i10.4 HSYMUY3 arm.
. •auois inaurlAtioo a3sodo8d
z0-
0
0
Ca:
j4r sol,r
rm.
+i
1•14••••
110
*-1-
WM
a,
" 1.:-...
-
• .
•
1
',:. 1 .••••••••:. IL, •vr,,
r. 1 ......• .,.;
1
r& •
i., ,
1
. .:1-:-!.;•,:lr, -.:4; Ilk. ‘
--,
k
Iz.
,.......-t4.-1,...--• -
L
—L.
4
..-1,,..-1.1.,,.....,,,,...,s
-..7.14.r.::: -.7r::
.
.
..4.,r....
:e.---r.L.v,...ca:7,:,-,•••:z,••
. , -i
•r
t'.
.,,,, •
. .
.
.
• .
- ..-Ir
.LLJ
....
!
1 9
•
.. .4
;
.
-A
\
•
..
•,.., 1 \
""
1-
. -
1
- -
- T -
• - /
S. . .. -11 • _
ill .
~~~J i—��oa�oouv ~~~ ~~NW�0| | | -""`=
Primary Identification
racuity hppearance Jtanaaras 12
Servicelt,
Center
r -s="' 1.00A
1.00A
Now offering
Super Unleaded
Locate sign as promi-
nently and as close to
main traffic flow as
possible.
Position (height) of
Changeable Price/
Message Module to
be 8' minimum; 10'
recommended; or to
meet local zoning
laws.
Family of Signs
•
TEXACO
Service
Center
Re9- LOO
Unleaded 1.00
Now offering
Super Unleaded
(
ACO
Do Not
locate sign so that it
blocks view of canopy
identifier.
The Do Nots on these
pages apply to all
Primary Identification
signs.
Service Area Appearance
22
•
4
Top edge of Flag signs
aligns with bottom
edge of Spreader Bar.
I See next page
Numerals are keyed
on following pages.
ccurate signing of a new site is as much a part of its total look as is archi-
tecture or color. Exact color matching• typographic alignment, and sign
placement should comply with the standards set forth in this manual.
Following these guidelines will result in a clean, professional appearance
that has always been an integral part of Texaco's public image. Great care should
be taken to achieve the visual effects demonstrated on these pages with each
new site application.
•t —.t
'—'4
(tFt(t till
MIH tso53.0•0 7w1 wit yt•r 'r[MYJ]i
133Mlt WY',O! HI(
'3N('S13311H3lUV IAiiV 1VM/NOSiULiOW
r.
O
.r 1. nett nt Nw1 to
• 4444
y N... 1
L(1 H'MMIM • MYOYI
*t'•1 tyt1011i
00110 Nt100A13H1 -4204 HSVM4VO ONY
. 3/101S 1N aCIANO3 C3SOdOtld
•
i
to
U
if
t1
t
III' `1
11111! till !!1* ..
ill .1$11111111i1 4111'
0
SPECIAL NOTE:
The Advisory Planning Commission Minutes for the July meeting
were not available for distribution with the packet. The minutes
will be distributed with the Additional Information packet on
Monday.
Agenda Information Memo
August 2, 1988, City Council Meeting
WAIVER OF PLAT/ZENDER ACRES/VINCE KENNEDY
G. Waiver of Plat for Vincent J. Kennedy to Split Lot 5, Zender
Acres Into Separate Parcels --A public hearing was held by the
Advisory Planning Commission at their last regular meeting held
on July 26, 1988 to consider a waiver of plat for the conveyance
of a land sale located on the north side of Lone Oak Road just
west of Pilot Knob Road for Vincent and Eileen Kennedy. The APC
is recommending approval.
For a copy of the planning and Engineering Department's report,
refer to pages 104+ through (t l .
For a copy of the APC action, refer to page(s) .
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the
waiver of plat for Vincent and Eileen Kennedy, Lot 5, Zender
Acres as requested.
CITY OF EAGAN
SUBJECT: WAIVER OF PLAT
APPLICANT: VINCENT AND EILEEN KENNEDY
LOCATION: LOT 5, ZENDER ACRES; SE 1/4 OF SECTION 4
EXISTING ZONING: R-1 (SINGLE-FAMILY)
DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: JULY 26, 1988
DATE OF REPORT: JULY 18, 1988
REPORTED BY: PLANNING AND ENGINEERING DEPARTMENTS
APPLICATION SUMMARY
An application has been submitted requesting a Waiver of Plat for
the conveyance of a land sale located on the north side of Lone
Oak Road just west of Pilot Knob Road. On November 20, 1984, a
Preliminary Plat for the Oakwood Addition, consisting of fourteen
single-family lots on 7.5 acres, was approved by the City
Council. The Final Plat was never completed; therefore, a new
Preliminary Plat will be required before any further subdivision
occurs. The Waiver of Plat accurately reflects the design of the
previously approved plat. A 30' easement along the east side of
lot 5 will provide access to the northern portion of the lot.
One single-family structure will be allowed on that area. If and
when the platting procedure begins again, it will become
dedicated street right-of-way.
Currently, there are homes on lots 4 and 5 and (two) on lot 6 to
the west. Parcel A on the north will contain 87,800 sq.ft. and
the existing homesite (parcel B) will contain 34,000 sq. ft. It
meets all code setback requirements.
If approved, this Waiver of Plat shall be subject to all
applicable ordinances.
ENGINEERING COMMENTS: The existing residence on proposed Parcel
B presently is served by City sewer and water. The Development
will be required to provide a 30' wide easement along the
easterly side of proposed Parcel B. This 30' wide roadway
easement will provide public access to Parcel A and would serve
as a portion of the required street right-of-way for future
Development.
Assessments
as follows:
proposed as a condition of the Waiver are identified
PROJ # DESCRIPTION RATE QUANTITY AMOUNT
Future Trunk Storm Sewer .056 121,990sf $6,831
Future Lone Oak Road $48.05/ff 200 ff $9,610
TOTAL PROPOSED ASSESSMENT $16,441
Lot 5, Zender Acres will be subject to additional sanitary sewer
and water trunk assessments when the area is final
platted and developed into lots.
\05
CONDITIONS: KENNEDY WAIVER
1) A 30' driveway easement along the east side of lot 5 shall
provide access to the newly created parcel.
2)
Development is required to accept its additional assessment
obligations as defined in the staff's report in accordance
with the dimension as shown on the Waiver of Plat and the
rates in effect at the time of the Waiver.
3) The Development is required to fulfill its monetary
obligations to the City for costs associated with Project
#445.
fob
t-111-1 67c
L7'2 r1fie
M b 1
MENDOTA
(i/
. ERSTATE r j 49. 1
1
/LOST o� .'II �`g
f COUNTRY / u i '
i CLUB I COPPbRATE J
!/ �' l Lo ��I �1�`J Sao
)GW OF CENTER CURVE
ALON <-�y
�T w V * S •v[ � �p s
OGCviEY I� ryr�n Vr<w � .:4:777T
% Y V Y/R�
a.E 1t✓ as Re }R.� h.. (j
�,t\/ fir- �•
a'
Al OrF i AVE'
KTi L$bR, .1 f,
1.
r cvE , Tg ` I
- e
x� , 1j G
p a - 'Ia�
P t
17,'-a cu
P' :uggvi n•x(94_ l
....1~ �� .6 -7-://�
A I If rf
` r. I
r .`G�
..M. -
/;w.3.�t
.
,
,
i_ --
�/ • irVfir�1Iv)(—_QAC S�—,
. 114_4 ". v/Eq , A N l"
wnC
LOST SPU'/gr.ICE', ��Cr->,,‘!
CLUS �r Li't
cc
LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
•
avvOu BONN 101id
•
C
4
O
Qo
CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY
to
e a a
-
-
.1
‘IA* -41--- R
$
2
SI 3:ir f. z ^ o
:�t �_� 4 ' Y e'si�
•115€a
>
Ai s 1.e: E :9
tl
6 c .1 . .GS
8's � E � -keg=
•.W 3a„ ji5 E 1 r�2Y
-i -qW z.- 1 ^@.4.
�� .4 3.a ygy �e V:ny4
am I ��� 1 1 Ya�F.
X4. tb4$ , : i
• 0
�.1 3.%(...)H
p:f1.-
! t;
Cl=
r•
<c(
AM •• w .••
I •C:N 1C'..?d 1
Iii 'Vfd '4c! '�� a
r. • •... •.w ..., ,,.. • — —�
L
7
• 'a
22
pl
L
3AINC N33113
J
0
0
0
2.
113.: M
Cr
• T %
✓✓
i
- `V'0/$ a-
• - \/I
'•.•• ..�a a.
/
• .▪ ..
a/ NEI
ai:
J
;,0-1
is
a
•
sr
.- .. set -- 1. u•,.
Asa
W
N
SHEET a OF 2
LONE OAK ROAD IMPROVEMENTS
TRUNK STORM SEWER -121,990 S.F.
LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
1
Q �
•w °
o
CC
. 1
a 2
a
VI. *alb 1I•N 1..1.1101
avOi BONN 101Id
PREPARED FOR:
SUBJECT PARCEL
F1G# I
city of eagan
PUBLIC
WORKS
DEPARTMEN
STORM SEWER
MASTER PLAN
approved:
standard
plate If:
\\
SPECIAL NOTE:
The Advisory Planning Commission Minutes for the July meeting
were not available for distribution with the packet. The minutes
will be distributed with the Additional Information packet on
Monday.
Agenda Information Memo
August 2, 1988, City Council Meeting
WAIVER OF PLAT FOR CLIFF ROAD PROPERTIES
H. Waiver of Plat for Cliff Road Properties to Combine a Portion
of Outlot B, Cliff Lake Center Addition --A public hearing was
held by the Advisory Planning Commission to consider a waiver of
plat for the Cliff Road Properties in order to allow the
conveyance of a land transaction. The Advisory Planning
Commission is recommending approval.
For a copy of th Planning and Engineering Department report,
refer to pages (1(* through LLS.
For a copy of the APC minutes, refer to page(s) Wo .
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the
waiver of plat for Cliff Road Properties as presented.
�k3
CITY OF EAGAN
SUBJECT: WAIVER OF PLAT
APPLICANT: CLIFF ROAD PROPERTIES
LOCATION: SW 1/4 OF SECTION 29
SE 1/4 OF SECTION 30
EXISTING ZONING: PD (PLANNED DEVELOPMENT)
A (AGRICULTURAL)
DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: JULY 26, 1988
DATE OF REPORT: JULY 18, 1988
REPORTED BY: PLANNING AND ENGINEERING DEPARTMENTS
APPLICATION SUMMARY
An application has been submitted requesting a Waiver of Plat in
order to allow the conveyance of a land transaction. The site is
located along the west side of proposed Cliff Lake Drive, north
of Cliff Road. The shaded .3 -acre triangular piece as shown on
the attached exhibit will be transferred along with a portion of
vacated Rahn Road to the 20 (plus or minus) acre agriculturally -
zoned parcel 011-76 owned by Federal Land Company. In exchange,
Federal Land will grant a roadway easement for the Cliff Lake
Drive construction. Dedicated right-of-way would be required
when the Federal Land parcel develops.
If approved, this Waiver of Plat shall be subject to all
applicable code requirements and,
1. When parcel 011-76 develops, the owner shall dedicate right-
of-way for Cliff Lake Drive.
2. The .3 -acre triangular piece created along with the vacated
portion of Rahn Road shall be combined with parcel 011-76.
SPECIAL NOTE:
The Advisory Planning Commission Minutes for the July meeting
were not available for distribution with the packet. The minutes
will be distributed with the Additional Information packet on
Monday.
MEMO TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCILMEMBERS
FROM: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES
DATE: AUGUST 1, 1988
SUBJECT: ADDITIONAL INFORMATION FOR AUGUST 2, 1988
CONSENT AGENDA
F. Receive Report/Approve Plans and Authorize Ad for Bids for
Well #13 --Enclosed and referenced as pages 18A - 18H is the
feasibility report for Project 550A, Well #13.
NEW BUSINESS
E. Galaxie Cliff Plaza - Enclosed for City Council review are a
copy of the APC minutes, referenced as page 89A - 89H. Also
enclosed is a brief memo from the City Attorney referenced as
pages 89I - 89J.
F. Conditional Use Permit for Yocum Oil Company --Enclosed for
City Council review is copy of the Planning Commission minutes,
referenced as pages 102A - 102D.
G. Waiver of Plat for Vince Kennedy --Enclosed and referenced as
pages 112A - 112C is a copy of the APC minutes on this item.
H. Waiver of Plat for Cliff Road Properties --Enclosed and
referenced as page 116A is a copy of the APC minutes for this
item.
/S/ Thomas L. Hedges
City Administrator
Report for
Deep Well No. 13
Eagan, Minnesota
City Project No. 550A
July 1988
File No. 49466
Bonestroo
DEMIRosene
Anderlik &
flAssociates
Engineers & Architects
July 21, 1988
Honorable Mayor and Council
City of Eagan
3830 Pilot Knob Road
Eagan, MN 55122
Re: Deep Well No. 13
Project No. 550A & 550B
Our File No. 49466
Lear Mayor and Council:
Otto G. Bonestroo, P.E.
Robert W. Rosene, P.E.
Joseph C. Anderlik, P.E.
Bradford A. Lemberg, P.E
Richard E. Turner, P.E.
James C. Olson, P.E.
Glenn R. Cook, P.E.
Thomas E. Noyes, P.E.
Robert G. Schunicht, P.E.
Marvin L. Sorvala, P.E.
Keith A. Gordon, P.E.
Richard W. Foster. P.E.
Donald C. Burgardt, PE.
Jerry A. Bourdon, P.E.
Mark A. Hanson, P.E.
Ted K. Field, P.E.
Michael T. Rautmann, P.E.
Robert R. Pfefferle, P.E.
David O. Loskota, PE.
Thomas W. Peterson, P.E.
Michael C Lynch, P.E.
James R. Maland, P.E.
Kenneth P. Anderson, P.E.
Keith A. Bachmann, PE.
Mark R. Rolfs, P.E.
Robert C. Russek, A.I.A.
Thomas E. Angus, P.E.
Howard A. Sanford, P.E.
Charles A Erickson
Leo M. Pawelsky
Harlan M. Olson
Susan M. Eberlin
Mark A. Seip
Transmitted herewith is our report for the construction of Deep Well No. 13
and the associated pumping facility.
We would be pleased to meet with the Council and other interested parties at a
mutually convenient time to discuss any aspect of this report.
Yours very truly,
BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES, INC.
Richard W. Foster
R.WF : c i
Approved by:
Date:
RPT49466
ONO
I hereby certify that this Report was prepared by me
or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly
Registered Professional Engineer under the laws of the
State of Minnesota.
Richard W. Foster
Date: Jul 22 1988 Reg. No. 11609
7- ?-rf--r
2335 West Highway 36 • St. Paul, Minnesota 55113 • 612-636-4600
SCOPE: This project provides for the construction of an additional well for
the City of Eagan's municipal water supply. Well Site No. 13 is located in
the northeast corner of Cliff Road and Lake Park Drive in the City's south
well field. The well site is shown on Figure 1.
FEASIBILITY AND RECOMMENDATIONS: This project is feasible from an engineering
standpoint and is in accordance with objectives established in the Master
Water Distribution Plan. The project as outlined herein can best be carried
out as two contracts, Deep Well No. 13 and Well No. 13 Pumping Facility. This
report assumes all grading (including muck excavation, filling and compacting)
and water main construction being done by Dakota County will be completed by
the times required. Grading and water main construction is being done under
Dakota County Project No. 32-14 (City Project No. 510) and Project No. 31-21
(City Project No. 466) respectively.
DISCUSSION:
Well - This project provides the construction of a 500 foot deep Jordan
sandstone well. This is an excellent aquifer capable of providing wells of
1200 to 1400 gpm (gallons per minute). In the Eagan area, the Jordan
sandstone is capped with the Shakopee-Oneota limestone layer which helps to
minimize the possibility of contamination of the Jordan aquifer from ground-
water in the surface stratas of the earth above the Jordan. Ground water in
the Jordan strata in Eagan generally flows from the south to the Minnesota
River and has a static water level 120 to 130 feet below the surface of the
RPT49466
well site. The top of the Shakopee-Oneota limestone is generally 230' to 240'
below the surface and the top of the Jordan is generally 390' to 400' below
the surface in the well site area. The Jordan strata is usually from 80' to
:L00' thick.
Pumps and Pumphouse - The use of a line shaft turbine pump is recommended for
use with this well. With this pump assembly, the electric motor for the pump
:Ls on top of the pump head in the pumphouse. The pump is located sufficiently
below the lowest level of drawdown to prevent the pump from sucking air. The
motor rotates the pump by use of the line shaft in the column pipe which
extends from the motor and pump head down to the pump. This type of pump is
most easily serviced and is most economical for the setting depth of a Jordan
well.
A pumphouse of masonry construction is provided to house the well pump motor
and electrical controls. The pumphouse would also contain heating, cooling,
and ventilation for equipment and personnel protection. It is intended to
hold meetings with nearby residents to obtain their input as to exterior
appearance. This input should produce a facility fitting into the local
neighborhood while providing a desirable minimum maintenance exterior. Site
work including landscaping and sprinkler system and a bituminous access drive
would be provided under the pumphouse portion of this project.
RPT49466
-3-
iso
Standby Power - The South Well Field presently contains two wells with two
additional wells being constructed by next year. Maintaining water supply in
the south field in the event of a power failure should be considered.
Protection from power failure in the North Well Field is provided by two gas
engine driven wells which can be pumped directly to the distribution system
and two sources of power (Dakota Electric and Northern States Power) at the
water plant.
In the South Well Field, emergency pumping can be provided at selected wells
or a combination of emergency pumping at wells and the proposed water plant.
At Well No. 13 pumping during a power failure could be provided through use of
a natural gas engine; combination motor and engine drive; portable or
dedicated standby power generation with single motor, dual electric drives or
a variable frequency drive system. The selection of emergency pumping
equipment at Well 13 is dependent on the emergency pumping equipment selected
for the proposed water plant. Depending on method chosen, the estimated cost
of Well No. 13 project would increase in the range of $20,000 to $70,000.
Well No. 13 will pump into the distribution system until the proposed plant is
completed in 1991. The design of normal and emergency pumping equipment must
also consider the reduced pumping head in 1991 to minimize the cost of future
facility modifications.
RPT49466
-4-
Supply Main - The 16 inch supply main along Cliff Road is being constructed
under Dakota County Project No. 31-21 (City Project No. 466) and includes a 12
inch stub to the site. The discharge for the pumphouse will connect to this
12 inch stub.
EASEMENTS: The well will be constructed on property owned by the City and no
easements are required.
ASSESSMENT AREA
No assessments are required for Deep Well No. 13 as the project is
from the supply and storage charges levied with each building permit.
paid for
COST ESTIMATES: A detailed cost estimate is presented in Appendix A located
at the back of this report. The total
estimated project cost is $374,000
which includes contingencies and related overhead. Overhead costs are estim-
ated at 30% and include legal, engineering, administration and bond interest.
REVENUE: Revenue to cover the cost of this project is obtained from the
Utility Enterprise Fund.
PROJECT SCHEDULE
Present Feasibility Report
Approve Well Plans and Specifications
Receive Well Bids
Award Well Contract
Neighborhood Meetings
Approve Pumphouse Plans and Specifications
Award Pumphouse Contract
Complete Well Construction
Well No. 13 Operational
Complete Pumphouse Construction
R.PT49466
-5-
August
2, 1988
August 2, 1988
August 26, 1988
September 6, 1988
August -Sept., 1988
September, 1988
October, 1988
February, 1989
May, 1989
June -July, 1989
APPENDIX A
PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE
DEEP WELL NO. 13
PROJECT NO. 550A&B
1. Deep Well No. 13 $ 136,000
2. Well Pump 31,000
3. Pumphouse, Equipment and Controls 94,000
4. Site Work and Field Piping 13,000
Subtotal $ 274,000
+ 5% Contingencies 14,000
Subtotal $ 288,000
+ 20Z Legal, Engr., Admin. & Bond Interest 57,600
TOTAL $ 345,600
RPT49466
-6-
1
0 ae
2 "i
0
In Q
.--
in I-
0
z z z
J F- z
W w�
oz
eQ
w o_
w
o�w
0
—
J �
W
Z
U
Z
W
N N
O
c
OCJ
O O
ccN
(
Q
W
Z
m Q
0
MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING
EAGAN ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION
EAGAN, MINNESOTA
JULY 26, 1988
A regular meeting of the Eagan Advisory Planning Commission was
held on Tuesday, July 26, 1988, at 7:00 o'clock p.m. at the Eagan
Municipal Center. Present were Chairman Pawlenty, Members Garry,
Voracek, Trygg, Wilkins, Merkley and Graves. Also present were
Assistant Planner Jim Sturm, Assistant City Engineer Mike Foertsch
and City Attorney James Sheldon.
AGENDA
Chairman Pawlenty noted that Item D of the Agenda (Waiver of
Plat - Opus Corporation) was to be continued to a later meeting.
Wilkins moved, Graves seconded the motion to approve the agenda
as amended. All voted in favor.
MINUTES
June 28. 1988 Minutes. Trygg stated that on page 16, paragraph
8, the vote should be revised to read:
"Voracek and Wilkins voted in favor; Pawlenty, Garry, Merkley,
Graves and Trygq voted against. The motion failed."
Garry stated that on page 2 regarding the May 26, 1988 Minutes,
he did not make the request to change page 1, that it was Graves. He
also stated that in the next paragraph, Graves abstained and he voted
in favor.
Garry moved, Graves seconded the motion to approve the June 28,
1988 Advisory Planning Commission Minutes as amended. All voted in
favor.
JULY 12, 1988 SPECIAL MEETING
Garry stated he was dismayed as he only received 4 days' notice
of the meeting. He further stated he was unable to attend the meeting
because he was out-of-town.
GALAXIE CLIFF PLAZA - CLIFF PLAZA PARTNERSHIP
The first public hearing of the evening was convened by Chairman
Pawlenty in regard to the rezoning and preliminary plat of 25.36
Agricultural acres to a Planned District located south of Cliff Road,
west of Galaxie Avenue and east of I -35E in the Northwest Quarter of
Section 32.
Page 2/PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES
July 26, 1988
Assistant Planner Jim Sturm stated that earlier this year, a
plan was submitted to the City requesting a preliminary plat and
rezoning to a planned development district tor the Galaxie Clitr
Plaza Addition. After the initial concept review by the Advisory
Planning Commission and neighborhood meetings, a revised submission
taking into account the neighborhood's concerns nad been prepared tor
formal APC action.
The site area (25.36 acres) configuration and basic circulation
system remain the same; however, the applicant would purchase the
triangular Astleford roadside business -zoned parcel it the planned
development zoning was approved. The parcel would then be platted
along with the overall plan.
The total development (including the Astleford parcel) contains
161,439 gross square footage. Building sizes could not be increased
from this amount without approval by the City Council. Approximately
850 parking stalls would be required by code and they would be
provided.
Mr. Sturm informed the Commission of the proposed uses. He
stated the proposed uses fall within the limited business zoning
category except for the retail and fast-food facility. A
Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment would be necessary for these uses.
He further stated all building and parking setbacks meet code
requirements and the lot coverage is 7 percent; limited business
zoning allows 20 percent. The total impervious coverage is 46
percent; 54 percent of the site would be green space.
None of the buildings would be above two stories. There would be
a 50 foot buffer strip along Galaxie Avenue. The existing plan
material will be retained and more added, especially in the southern
area where the site is open grassland.
Brad Swenson, Tri -Land Companies, (Developer) , informed the
Commission that the Roadside Business would be shifted; the 50 foot
buffer would be added to shield the existing property and the
development would compliment the environment. The landscape architect
for the development presented the proposed plans to the Commission.
Be stated the developer would maintain as many trees as possible. He
further stated there would be three access points.
Graves questioned if the Merrill Lynch building would be 10,000
square feet. Sturm stated it would be a 20,000 square foot building
(two stories X 10,000).
Merkley asked if all four sides ofbuildings would be similar in
appearance regarding the exterior materials, etc. He was informed
that they would be similar.
Page 3/PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES
July 26, 1988
Mary Winchester, 1830 Carrols Way, stated she was representing
her neighborhood. She stated there were many unaddressed issues. She
stated the neighborhood residents had concerns regarding, the
interior remaining residential, the berming, the use for the
northeast corner, removal of the theater and restaurant, retaining as
many trees as possible, small plantings were unacceptable and the
roadside business should be discarded. She felt it was not a
compromise plan. She further stated there were many new concerns
regarding no trees in the buffer zone, too many parking spaces, and
excessive lighting. She stated the plans were not firm enough. She
requested the Commission deny the request until the impact of other
developments were assessed.
Dean Brock, 1844 Norbert Court, stated he is concerned with the
increase in traffic in the area as there are many children living in
the residential areas. He stated he feels lives will be at risk. He
requested residential or agricultural zoning.
Greg Maloney, 4713 Westwind Trail, stated he felt the Mayor is
going back on his campaign pledge as he had promised no commercial
zoning in residential areas.
Carma Klein, 4580 Blackhawk, had reservations regarding the
whole area. She stated she is against the health club and requested
the Commission leave the area residential.
Harley Hansen, 1848 Norbert Court, stated he was against
exercise clubs in the neighborhood. He had concerns regarding the
road entry as he felt it was too short and would cause traffic
problems. He stated the buffer zone was no concession and he
questioned the setbacks. He requested specific landscape plans. Mr.
Sturm stated staff required 50' buffer from the back of the
right-of-way, therefore buffer would be 76 feet from the back of the
curb.
William Fitzgerald, 1835 Harris Way, stated traffic levels in
the area had already increased and requested a study regarding the
effect of the increased traffic. He stated the loss of the trees
could potentially cause excessive snow drifts. He also was concernea
regarding too much noise in the area. He telt the plan was bad from
the start.
Barbara Ferris, 4924 Safari Court, stated she is 100% against
the commercial development and was concerned about increased
assessments. She stated the taxes are too high.
Bob Harrison, 4714 Norbert, requested the Commission not change
from the original residential zoning. He felt there would be too much
traffic in the area.
Page 4/PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES
July 26, 1988
Mike Fabry, 4916 Safari Court, asked the Commission to not spoil
t:he nature of Eagan. He stated there was too much traffic in the area
and that the buffers would be ineffective. He felt the plans were too
indef inite.
Nancy Twadell stated she felt the plan does not meet the
Comprehensive Guide Plan. She further stated she had two petitions to
present to the Council against the plan. She stated over 200
neighbors had signed the petitions. She was concerned regarding the
Astleford property.
Helen Hansen, 4900 Safari Pass, stated taxpayers do have a voice
in the decision and stated she was against the proposal.
Cathy Mackey, 1823 Harris Way, stated she was concerned that the
traffic would drive the people out of the neighnorhood. She further
stated the development would destroy the beautiful neighbornood.
Katherine Schotz, 4963 Safari Circle, stated that as a realtor
she feels the development would destroy the residential area.
George Shangrin, 1925 Berkshire, stated there would be too much
traffic in the area if the proposed development were developed.
Chris Mendt, 4752 Floor Drive, stated he feels his concerns are
not being heard by the City. He feels tnere will be a terrible
traffic problem.
Gary Chamberlain, 4745 Norbert, reminded the Chairman of the
Commission of previous statements about conflicting zoning.
Robert Erlinson, 2973 Pilot Knob Road, commended the Planning
Commission for their concern. He stated he was against the fast-food
restaurant because of potential trash problems.
Kevin Sheridan, 1753 Forester, stated that as a father he was
very concerned regarding the increase in traffic in the area. He felt
t:he noise increase had not been studied. He stated that Eagan already
had a current high office vacancy problem. He urged the Commission to
reject the proposal.
Jeff Carlson, 4730 Westwind Trail, stated he felt the developer
was wasting the time of the Council and the citizens of Eagan with
indefinite plans.
Diane Miller stated the increased traffic in the area would
hamper the response time from the fire department.
Barbara Ferris requested an alternative residential plan be
presented to the Commission by the developer.
Page 5/PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES
July 26, 1988
Dave Fairchild, 1852 Norbert Court, stated the proposed plan was
not consistent with the prior limited business zoning use. Mr. Graves
asked Mr. Fairchild where he had obtained that information. Mr.
Fairchild stated through realtors in the area.
Jeff Smith, 1819 Tampere Circle, stated he became convinced
during the hearing of the unfeasibility of the project. He stated his
main concern was fire safety. He concurred with the previous concerns
expressed by others at the hearing. He asKed how long the
construction would last.
Penny Stepke, 1965 Safari Trail, stated her main concern
regarded the traffic.
Roxanne Wilde, 4751 Berkshire, was concerned regarding the
traffic congestion and the potential danger.
Helga Brock, 1844 Norbert, stated she too was concerned
regarding the increase in traffic.
Brad Swenson, developer, stated three neighborhood meetings had
been conducted and he felt all concerns were addressed. He stated
they had worked closely with the City staff and asked Mr. Runkle to
address the public concerns.
City Planner Dale Runkle stated the area was a limited business
area in the Comprehensive Guide Plan. He telt the buttering was a
good alternate plan. He felt the 50 foot buffer was adequate and that
leaving the natural characteristics would enhance the area along the
strip on Galaxie. He stated the intense uses would be the furthest
away from the neighborhood areas and that the RB zoning was put into
the least impact area. He stated the overall plan is being examined
and that the proposal was not being reviewed in a piece -meal manner.
Brad Swenson stated that City staff had requested they enter
into the PUD and enhance the site. Regarding the traffic concerns,
Mr. Swenson asked Mr. Foertsch about a possible turn lane on Galaxie.
Mr. Foertsch stated he was not prepared to deal with the issue at
that time. He further stated that Galaxie is a collector road with
5,000 trips per day.
Mr. Swenson stated it would be complementary uses in the office
buildings with the health club. He stated neighbors would have access
to a convenience store. He stated the area had been a limited
business district since the beginning of the Comprehensive Guide
Plan. He stated the heaviest noise concentration would be next to the
freeway. The parking space would be between 800 and 900 stalls. He
informed the Commission that he has Letters of Intent from the users
of the project, except for the southerly office building. He stated
the project would be completed within the next year or year and a
(6°
Page 6/PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES
July 26, 1988
half. He stated the pond had been deleted at the direction of the
City consultant.
Bob Vanney stated City staff had reviewed the eclipsed lighting
and they felt it would not affect the residential area.
Mr. Merkley stated he had reviewed the plan and questioned if
the property was good for limited business use. He stated first the
suitability of the limited business district should be decided ana
then the specifics of the proposal discussed.
Mr. Voracek asked when Safari Estates was first developed. He
was advised approximately 7 1/2 years ago. He asked if Safari Estates
was down -zoned from townhouse to residential ana who developed Safari
Estates. Mr. Runkle stated Safari Estates had been down -zoned to
residential and that the developer was Brian Wazchke.
Mr. Voracek questioned if the Comprehensive Guide Plan was
correct. He questioned if the Comprehensive Guide Plan made sense and
if the plan should be changed.
City Attorney Jim Sheldon stated that state legislation required
a Comprehensive Guide Plan. He stated this plan establishes a guide
for the City. He informed the Commission that any changes must not be
arbitrary or capricious. He stated any changes could put a heavy
burden of proof on the Council which may be difficult to prove.
Chairman Pawlenty asked Mr. Sheldon what would be some reasons for a
change. Mr. Sheldon stated he could provide this information to the
Commission if they so requested.
Ms. Trygg asked if there were traffic studies performed and if
there were figures on the additional traffic in the area. Mr.
Foertsch stated that at this time no studies had been completed.
Ms. Wilkins asked if Galaxie Avenue was included in the recent
transportation study and if there were any figures from the City of
Apple Valley. Mr. Foertsch stated there would be no figures from the
study for approximately three to six weeks.
Member Wilkins asked for a status report on the commercial
study. Mr. Sturm stated the matter would be before the Council in
approximately one month. Chairman Pawlenty asked if it was a
commercial or a retail study. Mr. Sturm stated the study was a retail
study. Mr. Pawlenty stated a retail study would not be helpful in
this matter but felt the matter should be continued awaiting legal
comments.
Mr. Graves asked what access Astleford currently has to Galaxie
Avenue. He asked Mr. Swenson if there was any guarantee that the RB
district would be removed. Mr. Swenson stated it was guaranteed the
RB district would be removed. He stated he telt it would be a mistake
s�F
Page 7/PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES
July 26, 1988
to put the RB all by itself. Mr. Voracek agreed, however, he stated
it was only a small parcel remnant. Mr. Graves stated he felt it
would be a plus that should the proposal be approved that the RB
district would be gone.
Member Trygg asked if health, safety and welfare was an issue in
denying approval. Mr. Sheldon stated yes that they were always of
major concern.
Mr. Voracek stated that all of the property east of 35E is
currently R-1 and therefore the LB district in a small segment did
not make sense. He felt townhouses only made sense on this parcel. He
was concerned regarding the fire response problem.
Chairman Pawlenty stated that many concerns came before the
Commission by the residents. He stated that the fire safety problem
was a real reason for concern.
Mr. Garry stated he appreciated the audiences comments and that
the residents did have friends on the Commission. He further stated
he is familiar with the area. He telt the development dia not make
sense because of the traffic concerns, safety tor the children in the
area, the noise problem, the need for guidance regarding the
commercial development, whether it was in the best interest of the
community, and public safety concerns as it related to the fire
issue. He stated he recommended denial of the proposal. Mr. Merkley
stated he was in concensus with Mr. Garry.
Mr. Voracek asked if the developer had further comments. Mr.
Swenson stated the fire issue had been addressed at previous meetings
and questioned why the City hadn't voiced their concern at that time.
Mr. Graves stated he felt it was the wrong location for the
development. He stated the developer and owner had done everything
possible, however, he felt the Comprehensive Guide Plan did not make
sense.
Garry moved, Wilkins seconded, the motion to deny the re -zoning
and preliminary plat of 25.36 agricultural acres to a planned
development district located south of Cliff Road, west of Galaxie
Avenue and east of I -35E in the northwest quarter of Section 32
(Galaxie Cliff Plaza) because of the following concerns:
1. Traffic problems;
2. Children safety;
3. Noise problems;
4. Guidance regarding the commercial development;
Page 8/PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES
July 26, 1988
5. Not in the best interest of the community; ana
6. Public safety regarding the fire issue.
All voted in favor.
Member Trygg commended Mr. Swenson for his hard work. Chairman
Pawlenty stated he felt it was an excellent development and he
thanked the City staff and the developer for their work involved.
Mr. Voracek stated they were still faced with the zoning of the
RB issue. He encouraged the developer to put together a residential
plan which would include the zoning of the RB issue.
Chairman Pawlenty stated the matter would be before the City
Council at the August 2, 1988 Council meeting.
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - YOCUM OIL COMPANY
Chairman Pawlenty then convened the public hearing in regard to
the request for a conditional use permit to allow an automobile
service station and a car wash on Lot 5, Block 1, Thomas Lake Centre
Addition, located at the northeast intersection of Thomas Centre
Drive and Cliff Road in the southwest quarter of Section 28.
Assistant City Planner Jim Sturm stated an application had been
submitted requesting a conditional use permit to allow an automobile
service station/car wash facility with a pylon sign located at the
northeast intersection of Cliff Road and Thomas Lake Road in the
Thomas Lake Shopping Centre complex. In June, 1986, the Council
approved three pylon signs for the shopping center with the
understanding that there be no further pylon signs without Council
approval. The proposal requested a free-standing pylon sign at the
street intersection, as well as signage on the gas pump canopy. The
pylon has 80 square feet of signage area with an undesignated height.
The maximum allowed by Code is 27 feet with 125 square feet of
signage area. The 30 inch tall lettering on the canopy must be
reduced to 20% of the facade area to meet Code requirements.
Mr. Sturm stated that currently there are curb cuts onto Thomas
Centre Drive and the shopping center entrance. Both the planning and
the engineering departments recommended keeping the existing curbing
in tact at the northeast portion of the lot. They felt that this
would allow for more parking stalls and/or landscaped green areas.
Code requires 24 parking stalls for this facility and 39 toot wide
stalls were being provided in the proposal, including twelve stalls
at the 6 gas pump locations. He stated the stalls should be increased
to a 10 foot width.
Mr. Sturm stated it was recommended that a condition of the
approval for the shopping center required that the landscaping be
MEMORANDUM
T0: Tom Hedges
City of Eagan
FROM: James F. Sheldon
DATE: August 1, 1988
RE: Galaxie Cliff Plaza
Our File No: 00E-05366
This memo is to confirm our earlier conversations regarding the above
property. The date following the Planning Commission meeting, 1
received a call from Bill Soules about this property. He indicated
that he intended to drop the Astleford parcel and delete the
neighborhood business designation from the Planned Development. He
intends to ask for an entire development based on limited business
only. He indicated he had owned property since 1968 and that the
property had been comp. guide planned for limited business since the
inception of the Eagan Comprehensive Guide Plan. According to him,
the property has been taxed and specially assessed at commercial
rates.
1 told him, that without more facts, 1 could not advise him whether
the proposal had to go back to the Planning Commission. When I let
you know about the phone call, you did ask me to do some legal
research with respect to the property.
Minnesota law prevents development of property that is in conflict
with the Comprehensive Guide Plan. The legal issue is whether the
landowner is entitled to a re -zoning that is in accordance with the
City's Comprehensive Guide Plan, or whether the City may refuse to
re -zone the property at the landowner's request to the designation in
the Comprehensive Guide Plan.
The leading case in Minnesota is Amcon Corp. v. City of Eagan, 348
N.W.2d 66 (Minn. 1984) . The focus of the Court's decision in that
case provides that if the opponents prove that the failure to re -zone
is unsupported by any rational basis related to promoting the public
health, safety, morals or general welfare, that the classification
amounts to a taking without compensation.
In the pgcon case, the failure of the City to advance any rationale
for not following its Comprehensive Plan and not granting the
landowners, whose property was zoned agricultural, the business
classification indicated on the City's Comprehensive Plan was strong
821
evidence of arbitrary action by the City in refusing the request for
re -zoning. Thus, the City's refusal to re -zone according to the
Comprehensive Plan and map was evidence the City, in refusing to
re -zone the property, was acting in an arbitrary manner (incn at
75) .
If the City is to refuse to re -zone the property in accordance with
the petition from the landowner, City must set forth the basis and
rationale to satisfy the judicial and statutory requirements.
Rationale that states in essence, if the property is re -zoned limited
business, it will develop limited business uses and the
characteristics of limited business uses, would not be sufficient to
deny a re -zoning to limited business.
Please contact me if you have questions.
Very truly yours,
MC,MENOMY & SEVERSON, P.A.
James , './ Sheldon
JPS/d3
Page 8/PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES
July 26, 1988
5. Not in the best interest of the community; ana
6. Public safety regarding the fire issue.
All voted in favor.
Member Trygg commended Mr. Swenson for his hard work. Chairman
Pawlenty stated he felt it was an excellent development and he
thanked the City staff and the developer for their work involved.
Mr. Voracek stated they were still faced with the zoning of the
RB issue. He encouraged the developer to put together a residential
plan which would include the zoning of the RB issue.
Chairman Pawlenty stated the matter would be before the City
Council at the August 2, 1988 Council meeting.
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - YOCUM OIL COMPANY
Chairman Pawlenty then convened the public hearing in regard to
the request for a conditional use permit to allow an automobile
service station and a car wash on Lot 5, Block 1, Thomas Lake Centre
Addition, located at the northeast intersection of Thomas Centre
Drive and Cliff Road in the southwest quarter of Section 28.
Assistant City Planner Jim Sturm stated an application had been
submitted requesting a conditional use permit to allow an automobile
service station/car wash facility with a pylon sign located at the
northeast intersection of Cliff Road and Thomas Lake Road in the
Thomas Lake Shopping Centre complex. In June, 1986, the Council
approved three pylon signs for the shopping center with the
understanding that there be no further pylon signs without Council
approval. The proposal requested a free-standing pylon sign at the
street intersection, as well as signage on the gas pump canopy. The
pylon has 80 square feet of signage area with an undesignated height.
The maximum allowed by Code is 27 feet with 125 square feet of
signage area. The 30 inch tall lettering on the canopy must be
reduced to 20% of the facade area to meet Code requirements.
Mr. Sturm stated that currently there are curb cuts onto Thomas
Centre Drive and the shopping center entrance. Both the planning and
the engineering departments recommended keeping the existing curbing
in tact at the northeast portion of the lot. They felt that this
would allow for more parking stalls and/or landscaped green areas.
Code requires 24 parking stalls for this facility and 39 root wide
stalls were being provided in the proposal, including twelve stalls
at the 6 gas pump locations. He stated the stalls should be increased
to a 10 foot width.
Mr. Sturm stated it was recommended that a condition of the
approval for the shopping center required that the landscaping be
boa
Page 9/PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES
July 26, 1988
installed along the perimeter of the whole complex. He stated that
additional plant material should be placed along the eastern property
line.
Mr. Sturm stated the site plan proposed conveying storm water
runoff from the parking lot and pump isle are northerly in a
bituminous swale between the gas pump islands and the convenience
store. He stated the development is required to revise the
grading/drainage plan to eliminate directing storm water runoff ana
t:he bituminous swaies along the easterly and westerly sides of the
pump islands. Staff advised modifying the proposed grading/drainage
plan creating a high -point running east to west and directing storm
water runoff northerly and southerly to the curb lines and intercept
t:he storm water runoff into an internal storm sewer system.
Mr. Sturm informed the Commission that with a proposed entrance
from the easterly adjacent parking lot, the entrance at the northeast
corner to the proposed convenience store car wasn onto the shopping
center entrance road would not be allowed. The proposed westerly
entrance from Thomas Centre Drive would be required to be a concrete
apron from the curb line to the end radius of the curb return zone
from Thomas Centre Drive. The development would be required to
construct a similar concrete apron at the northerly entrance from the
shopping center entrance road.
Assistant City Engineer Mike Foertsch questioned why the 30 foot
proposal for the entrance instead of the required 30 foot. Tony
Yocum, President of Yocum Oil, stated the 40 foot curb cut was a
requirement for the landscaping as it pushes into the pump area by 20
feet. He stated it would improve the traffic flow.
Mr. Yocum stated he was concerned regarding the curb cut and
stated he felt it would prevent intermingling of the car wash
traffic. He stated he would rather close the cut between Lots 4 and 5
and questioned what the concern was with not having two curb cuts.
Mr. Yocum stated he was comfortable with most of the conditions
of the City staff, however, he wanted to negotiate regarding the sign
ordinance.
Mr. Sturm stated the canopy was considered a part of the
building, and therefore the letters must not exceed the 20% formula.
Much discussion continued regarding the lettering size tor the sign.
Member Wilkins stated this should have been settled before review by
the Commission. Mr. Yocum asked approval of the curb cuts.
Mr. Graves stated that in condition number 2, there was a
typographical error where it should read 20% instead of 20 feet.
Wilkins asked for staff input regarding the developer's proposal
to close the entrance into the parking lot and leaving the other
roa3
Page 10/PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES
July 26, 1988
open. Mr. Foertsch that having two would be a free-for-all. He felt
that only one should remain. Wilkins asked what the distance was
between the two entrances. Mr. Foertsch stated between 110 teet and
115 feet. Wilkins stated she was concerned about the possibility of
accidents and a traffic flow problem.
Member Merkley asked that when the adjoining land developed, if
there was the recourse to close the curb cut at that time. Mr.
Sheldon stated that once it was there, it would remain.
Chairman Pawlenty asked the developer if he was comfortable with
the proposed sign requirements. Mr. Yocum stated he was not happy
with the requirements but he would conform to them.
Mr. Graves stated the matter should be reviewed further and
brought back to the Commission.
Mr. Yocum stated that the signing is very important to his
development. Mr. Graves asked if he still wished to have the matter
proceed at the meeting.
After much discussion regarding the canopy concern, Chairman
Pawlenty stated there was no need for the Commission to dwell on the
signage problem because it would be a Council issue.
Mr. Merkley stated he felt a ground sign would be aaequate. Mr.
Yocum stated it would be a traffic hazard in this particular
development.
Chairman Pawlenty stated that the canopy lettering condition
would stand as proposed by staff.
Mr. Graves asked if it was an all brick building. Mr. Sturm
stated it was an all brick building except for the canopy.
Member Wilkins asked if the entrance was closed would the
landscape plan need to be revised. Mr. Sturm stated it would not be
necessary. Wilkins stated she would like landscaping to extend to the
north curb of the entrance if it were closed off. She feels Lot 4
should be screened from the car wash. Mr. Voracek questioned the room
for such landscaping. Mr. Sturm stated that future developments would
also have to have landscaping.
Voracek moved, Wilkins seconded, the motion to approve a
conditional use permit to Yocum Oil Company to allow an automobile
service station and a car wash on Lot 5, Block 1, Thomas Lake Centre
Addition, located at the northeast intersection of Thomas Centre
Drive and Cliff Road in the southwest quarter of Section 28, subject
to the following conditions:
]?age 11/PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES
July 26, 1988
1. The trash enclosure shall be constructed of the same
materials as the building.
2. The canopy signage shall be limited to 20% of the canopy
facade area.
3. Only one access shall be allowed onto the shopping center
drive in.
4. All permanent parking stalls shall be 10' wide.
5. No rooftop mechanical equipment shall be visible from the
public streets.
6. No outside loudspeaker advertising or outside displays shall
be permitted.
7. Additional landscaping along the eastern property line shall
be required and approved prior to the issuance of a building permit.
8. The Development is required to revise the proposed site plan
to incorporate the following concerns:
a. Revise parking lot grades to a minimum 1%.
b. Revise drainage plan to eliminate proposed bituminous
swales along the easterly and westerly siaes of the
pump islands.
c. Revise entrance drive widths into site to a 30' width.
d. Construct concrete entrance aprons.
Wilkins, Voracek, Trygg, Merkley, Graves and Pawlenty voted in
favor; Garry voted against.
WAIVER OF PLAT — VINCENT J. KENNEDY
Chairman Pawlenty opened the next public hearing regarding the
application for a waiver of plat in order to split Lot 5, Zehnder
Acres, into separate parcels located in the southeast quarter of
Section 4, north of Lone Oak Road and west of Pilot Knob Road.
Assistant City Planner Jim Sturm stated an application had been
received requesting a waiver of plat for the conveyance of a land
sale located on the north side of Lone Oak Road just west of Pilot
Knob Road. On November 20, 1984, a preliminary plat for the Oakwood
Addition, consisting of 14 single family lots on 7.5 acres, was
approved by the City Council. The final plat was never completed.
Therefore, a new preliminary plat will be required before any further
subdivision occurs. The waiver of plat accurately reflects the design
Page 11/PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES
July 26, 1988
1. The trash enclosure shall be constructed of the same
materials as the building.
2. The canopy signage shall be limited to 20% of the canopy
facade area.
3. Only one access shall be allowed onto the shopping center
drive in.
4. All permanent parking stalls shall be 10' wide.
5. No rooftop
public streets.
be
be
to
6. No outside
permitted.
7. Additional landscaping along the eastern property line shall
required and approved prior to the issuance of a building permit.
8. The Development is required to revise the proposed site plan
incorporate the following concerns:
a. Revise parking lot grades to a minimum 1%.
b. Revise drainage plan to eliminate proposed bituminous
swales along the easterly and westerly sides of the
pump islands.
mechanical equipment shall be visible from the
loudspeaker advertising or outside displays shall
c. Revise entrance drive widths into site to a 30' width.
d. Construct concrete entrance aprons.
Wilkins, Voracek, Trygg, Merkley, Graves and Pawlenty voted in
favor; Garry voted against.
WAIVER OF PLAT — VINCENT J. KENNEDY
Chairman Pawlenty opened the next public hearing regarding the
application for a waiver of plat in order to split Lot 5, Zehnaer
Acres, into separate parcels located in the southeast quarter of
Section 4, north of Lone Oak Road and west of Pilot Knob Road.
Assistant City Planner Jim Sturm stated an application had been
received requesting a waiver of plat for the conveyance of a land
sale located on the north side of Lone Oak Road just west of Pilot
Knob Road. On November 20, 1984, a preliminary plat for the Oakwood
Addition, consisting of 14 single family lots on 7.5 acres, was
approved by the City Council. The final plat was never completed.
Therefore, a new preliminary plat will be required berore any turther
subdivision occurs. The waiver of plat accurately reflects the design
Page 12/PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES
July 26, 1988
of the previously approved plat. A 30 foot easement along the east
side of Lot 5 will provide access to the northern portion of the lot.
One single family structure would be allowed on that area. If the
platting procedure began again, it would become a dedicatee street
right-of-way. Mr. Sturm stated there are homes on the Lots 4 and 5
and two on Lot 6 to the west. Parcel A on the north would contain
87,800 square feet and the existing home site (Parcel B) woula
contain 34,000 square feet.
Vincent J. Kennedy, 1415 Lone Oak Road, (developer), statea the
drainage to the north was lacking on the original plat. He informed
the Commission he was only requesting the division at the present
time.
Tom Hanky, 1429 Laurel Oak Road, asked whether the lot would be
split and what affect the split would have on the Oakwood Addition.
He also questioned the cost of the assessments to him. He asked why
the split was necessary. Mr. Kennedy stated the split was necessary
for financing purposes.
Member Wilkins informed Mr. Kennedy that if he wished to develop
the land, he must reappear before the Commission.
Robert Erlinsen, 2973 Pilot Knob, stated his property abuts the
Kennedy property. He expressed concerns regarding the sewer. He
commended the Commission for their work.
Mr. Merkley asked Mr. Kennedy if there would be any building
before the re -plat. Mr. Kennedy stated there would be no building
before the re -plat.
Mr. Graves questioned the need for the waiver if the final plat
bad never been completed. Mr. Sturm stated the waiver was necessary
to allow another home.
Trygg moved, Merkley seconded, the motion to close the public
hearing and to approve the waiver of plat for Vincent J. Kennedy in
order to split Lot 5, Zehnder Acres, into separate parcels located in
the southeast quarter of Section 4 north of Lone Oak Road and west or
Pilot Knob Road, subject to the following conditions:
1. A 30' driveway easement along the east side of Lot 5 shall
provide access to the newly created parcel.
2. Development is required to accept its additional assessment
obligations as defined in the staff's report in accordance with the
dimension as shown on the Waiver of Plat and the rates in effect at
the time of the Waiver.
3. The Development is required to fulfill its monetary
obligations to the City for costs associated with Project No. 445.
Page 13/PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES
July 26, 1988
All voted in favor.
WAIVER OF PLAT - CLIFF ROAD PROPERTIES
Chairman Pawlenty opened the next public hearing regarding the
application for a waiver of plat in order to combine a portion of
Outlot B, Cliff Lake Centre Addition, with a parcel (011-76) to the
west located along the west side of proposed Cliff Lake Road in the
southwest quarter of Section 29 and the southeast quarter of Section
30.
Assistant City Planner Sturm informed the Commission an
application had been submitted requesting a waiver of plat in order
to allow the conveyance of a land transaction. The site is located
along the west side of proposed Cliff Lake Drive, north of Cliff
Road. A 0.3 acre piece would be transferred along witn a portion of
vacated Rahn Road to the 20 acre agriculturally -zoned parcel ownea by
Federal Land Company. In exchange, Federal Lana Company would grant a
roadway easement for the Cliff Lake Drive construction. Dedicated
right-of-way would be required when the Federal Land parcel develops.
The developer was not present at the meeting and there were no
public comments.
Mr. Voracek asked what a Comprehensive Plan District was on the
0.3 acre piece. Mr. Sturm stated it was PD/CSC-10. Mr. Voracek askea
if it was zoned D-4. Mr. Sturm stated it was zoned R-3. Mr. Voracek
stated that the two parcels are compatible. And as long as they are
compatible, he has no problem with the waiver of plat.
Voracek moved, Graves seconded, the motion to close the public
hearing and approve the waiver of plat for Cliff Road Properties in
order to combine a portion of Outlot B, Cliff Lake Centre Addition,
with a parcel (011-76) to the west located along the west side of
proposed Cliff Lake Road in the southwest quarter of Section 29 and
the southeast quarter of Section 30, subject to the following
conditions:
1. When Parcel 011-76 develops, the owner shall dedicate
right-of-way for Cliff Lake Drive.
2. The 0.3 acre triangular piece created along with the vacated
portion of Rahn Road shall be combined with Parcel 011-76.
All voted in favor.
CEDAR CLIFF COMMERCIAL PARK 5TH ADDITION - FEDERAL LAND COMPANY
Chairman Pawlenty convened the next public hearing regarding an
application for a preliminary plat (re -plat) of 4.69 acres and two
Page 13/PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES
July 26, 1988
All voted in favor.
WAIVER OF PLAT - CLIFF ROAD PROPERTIES
Chairman Pawlenty opened the next public hearing regarding the
application for a waiver of plat in order to combine a portion of
Outlot B, Cliff Lake Centre Addition, with a parcel (011-76) to the
west located along the west side of proposed Cliff Lake Road in the
southwest quarter of Section 29 and the southeast quarter of Section
30.
Assistant City Planner Sturm informed the Commission an
application had been submitted requesting a waiver of plat in order
to allow the conveyance of a land transaction. The site is located
along the west side of proposed Cliff Lake Drive, north of Cliff
Road. A 0.3 acre piece would be transferred along with a portion of
vacated Rahn Road to the 20 acre agriculturally -zoned parcel owned by
Federal Land Company. In exchange, Federal Lana Company would grant a
roadway easement for the Cliff Lake Drive construction. Dedicated
right-of-way would be required when the Federal Land parcel develops.
The developer was not present at the meeting and there were no
public comments.
Mr. Voracek asked what a Comprehensive Plan District was on the
0.3 acre piece. Mr. Sturm stated it was PD/CSC-10. Mr. Voracek askea
if it was zoned D-4. Mr. Sturm stated it was zoned R-3. Mr. Voracek
stated that the two parcels are compatible. And as long as they are
compatible, he has no problem with the waiver of plat.
Voracek moved, Graves seconded, the motion to close the public
hearing and approve the waiver of plat for Cliff Road Properties in
order to combine a portion of Outlot B, Cliff Lake Centre Addition,
with a parcel (011-76) to the west located along the west side of
proposed Cliff Lake Road in the southwest quarter of Section 29 and
the southeast quarter of Section 30, subject to the following
conditions:
1. When Parcel 011-76 develops, the owner shall dedicate
right-of-way for Cliff Lake Drive.
2. The 0.3 acre triangular piece created along with the vacated
portion of Rahn Road shall be combined with Parcel 011-76.
All voted in favor.
CEDAR CLIFF COMMERCIAL PARK 5TH ADDITION - FEDERAL LAND COMPANY
Chairman Pawlenty convened the next public hearing regarding an
application tor a preliminary plat (re -plat) of 4.69 acres ana two