No preview available
 /
     
09/06/1988 - City Council RegularAGENDA REGULAR MEETING EAGAN CITY COUNCIL EAGAN, MINNESOTA MUNICIPAL CENTER BUILDING SEPTEMBER 6, 1988 6:30 P.M. I. 6:30 - ROLL CALL & PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE (BLUE) II. 6:35 - ADOPT AGENDA & APPROVAL OF MINUTES (BLUE) III. 6:45 - DEPARTMENT HEAD BUSINESS (BLUE) A. PARKS DEPARTMENT 1. CONTRACT 87-2, Final Payment, Hard Court Construction/Miscellaneous Parks 2. CONTRACT 87-13, Final Payment, Shelter Buildings/Miscellaneous Parks B. PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT 1. ACCEPT RESIGNATION/Appoint Replacement, Water Quality Mgmt Committee IV. 6:55 - CONSENT AGENDA (PINK) A. PERSONNEL Items B. LICENSES, Plumbers C. RECEIVE PETITION/Authorize Parking Restrictions (Donald Ave North of Letendre D. RECEIVE REQUEST/Authorize Parking Restrictions (Sibley Terminal Ind Park) E. PROJECT 554, Receive Petition/Order Feasibility Report and Detail Plans (General Electrict Supply Company - Storm Sewer) F. PROJECT 552, Receive Feasibility Report/Order Public Hearing (Eagandale Center Industrial Park 3rd Addition, Phase 2 - Storm Sewer & Watermain) G. CONTRACT 88-36, Approve Plans/Order Advertisement for Bids (E.C.I.P. 3rd Addition, Phase 2, & Country Hollow 2nd Addition H. CONTRACT 88-35, Approve Plans/Order Advertisement for Bids (Hidden Valley & Stratford Oaks- Utilities) I. CONTRACT 88-01, Approve Change Order #2 (Fire Station #5) J. CONTRACT 88-21, Approve Change Order #1 (Cliff Lake Road - Grading & Utilities) K. CONTRACT 87-28, Approve Change Order #1 (Well #11) L. CONTRACT 87-28, Approve Final Payment/Acceptance (Well #11) M. CONTRACT 88-29, Receive Bids/Award Contract (Well #13) N. FINAL PLAT, Bridle Ridge 2nd Addition 0. PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT, COMPREHENSIVE GUIDE PLAN AMENDMENT, Rahncliff 2nd Addition/Austin Companies, REZONING of 16.08 LB (Limited Business) and RB (Roadside Business) Acres to a Commercial Planned Development District and a PRELIMINARY PLAT P. CONTRACT 88-9, Approve Change Order #1 (Manor Lake Addition - Trunk Utilities) Q. CONTRACT 87-20, Final Payment/Acceptance (Eagandale Center Industrial Park 8th Addition - Watermain and E -Z Air Park - Storm Sewer) R. CONTRACT 86-17, Final Payment/Acceptance (Sperry Consolidation Facility - Utilities) S. EXTENSION of Final Plat Approval, Eagan High School Addition V. 7:00 - PUBLIC HEARINGS (SALMON) PUBLIC HEARINGS A. VACATION, Public Hearing (Drainage/Utility Easement -Lot 8, Hilltop of Eagan) B. PROJECT 549, Public Hearing, Stratford Oaks (Sanitary & Storm Sewer) C. PROJECT 545, Public Hearing (Clearview Addition - Streets) D. PROJECT 542, Public Hearing (Alden Pond - Streets & Utilities) FINAL ASSESSMENT HEARINGS E. PROJECT 503, Final Assessment Hearing (Windtree 8th Addition - Streets & Utilities) F. PROJECT 493, Final Assessment Hearing (Greensboro 2nd Addition - Streets and Utilities) G. PROJECT 502, Final Assessment Hearing (R & B Addition - Storm Sewer) H. PROJECT 479, Final Assessment Hearing (Lexington/Northview Park - Trunk Storm Sewer) I. PROJECT 504, Final Assessment Hearing (Whispering Woods 2nd Addition - Streets & Utilities) J. PROJECT 460B, Final Assessment Hearing (North Nicols Road - Streets) K. PROJECT 486, Final Assessment Hearing (EZ Air Park - Storm Sewer) L. PROJECT 461, Final Assessment Hearing (Yankee Doodle Road - I -35E to Lexington Avenue - Streets) M. PROJECT 478, Final Assessment Hearing (Lexington Hill - Sanitary Sewer) N. PROJECT 492, Final Assessment Hearing (Lone Oak 2nd Addition/O'Neil Drive - Water & Sanitary) 0. PROJECT 505, Final Assessment Hearing (Country Hollow Addition - Trunk Storm & Sanitary) P. PROJECT 499, Final Assessment Hearing (Chapel Hill Baptist Church - Streets) To Be Continued to September 19, 1988, City Council Meeting VI. OLD BUSINESS (ORCHID) A. COMPREHENSIVE GUIDE PLAN AMENDMENT, Lexington Land Co, and REZONING of 57, R-3 (Townhouse) Acres to Planned Development District Located South of Bulk Mail Ctr Along Lexington Ave in SES of Sec 10 B. REZONING, Galaxie Cliff Plaza/Tri-Land Companies & Wm.Soules, of 10 (+/-) A (Agricultural) Acres to a LB (Limited Business) Planned Development District Consisting of One Lot and Three Outlots for Future Development and a PRELIMINARY ?LAT Containing 25.36 Acres Located S of Cliff Rd, W of Galaxie Ave in NWS of Sec 32 C. ?ROPOSAL for Median Cut on County Road 30, Blackhawk Plaza Project VII. NEW BUSINESS (TAN) A. ORDINANCE AMENDING City Code, Chapter 4 to Eliminate the "Certificate of Survey" Requirement for Expansion of an Existing Structure So Long As the Expansion Does Not Extend Onto New Property B. EXTENSION of Final Plat Approval, Oak Cliff Pond C. IMPLEMENTATION, Curbside Recycling Program D. SPECIAL PERMIT, Townhomes of Hllandale/Steve Ramsey, Temporary On -Site Advertising Sign, SES of Sec 20 E. SPECIAL PERMIT, Burnsville Lumber Co, Temporary marketing Sign for Whispering Woods, SW Corner of Cliff Road & Slater Road F. SPECIAL PERMIT, Sienna Corporation, Temporary Advertising, NWS of Sec 24, Wescott Road and Bridle Ridge Road G. SPECIAL PERMIT, Sienna Corporation, Temporary Advertising Sign, NWS of Sec 24, Wescott Road and Elrene Road H. WAIVER OF PLAT, B.H.Grace Corporation, Duplex Lot Split to Allow Individual Ownership, Lot 2, Block 1, Jean Addition I. VARIANCE, New Horizon Homes, Inc., A 2.33' Variance to the Front Yard Setback, Lots 14-17, Block 2, Thomas Lake Heights J. WAIVER OF PLAT, Opus Corporation, To Split Lots 14 and 16, Block 7, of the Eagandale Center Industrial Park and Combine into Two Lots Consisting of 7.2 Acres, and a CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT, for Outside Storage and Pylon Sign Located Along West Service Road in Eli of Sec 3 K. PRELIMINARY PLAT, Seneca Plant Addition/Metropolitan Waste Control Commission, Consisting of 87.83 Acres for the Expansion of the Seneca Waste Water Treatment Plant Located West of Comanche Road in the West Half of Section 17 and E: of Sec 18 L. PRELIMINARY PLAT, Wescott Square Addition/New Horizon Homes, of 9.83 R-3 (Townhouse) Zoned Acres for 71 Units Located Along Yankee Doodle and Elrene Road in NE1 of Sec 14 M. PERMIT, Model Home for Lot 7, Block 1, Woodlands 2nd Addition VIII. ADDITIONAL ITEMS (GOLD) A. DISTRIBUTION of 1988 Comprehensive Plan Update/Revision -Sanitary Sewer Collection System/Water Supply, Storage & Distribution System IX. ADMINISTRATIVE AGENDA (GREEN) X. VISITORS TO BE HEARD (for those persons not on agenda) XI. ADJOURNMENT MEMO TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCILMEMBERS FROM: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES DATE: AUGUST 31, 1988 SUBJECT: AGENDA INFORMATION FOR SEPTEMBER 6, 1988 CITY COUNCIL MEETING }APPROVE AGENDA ADOPT: MINUTES After approval is given to the September 6, 1988 agenda and regular City Council meeting minutes for the August 16, 1988 meeting, the following items are in order for consideration: •:DEPARTMENT HEADBUSINESS A. PARKS DEPARTMENT: The Director of Parks and Recreation is recommending final payment for two (2) contracts for various park improvements. Item 1. Contract 87-2, Final Payment, Hard Court Construction/ Miscellaneous Parks --Final payment and Change Order #3 are in order for consideration for Improvement Contract 87-2. This contract consists of various construction of tennis and hardcourt play areas at fifteen (15) parks. The Parks and Recreation staff has reviewed and found that Finley Brothers Enterprises has completed all work in accordance with the contract documents. The final payment amount is $11,408.05. Included in that final payment is a recommendation by the staff for a Change Order #3 in the amount of $1,171.50 which consists of a number of materials and labor spread through seven (7) parks. Most of the changes in the seven parks average $150 and involved the hauling of excessive soil, installation of a gate or additional sodding and topsoil that may have been required. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve Improvement Contract 87-2 for final payment and Change Order #3 for the total amount of $11,408.05 and that the City authorize final acceptance for perpetual maintenance. Item 2. Improvement Contract 87-13, Final Payment, Construction of Shelter Buildings at Sky Hill Park, Quarry Park, Carnelian Park and Walnut Hill Park --Final payment and an addition to Change Order #1 in the amount of $4,576 are in order for consideration. The City staff has reviewed and found that MG Astleford has completed all work in accordance with the contract documents. The final payment amount is $15,583, which includes a recommendation for Change Order #1. Agenda Information Memo September 6, 1988, City Council Meeting The Change Order includes additional wiring, an adjustment of the hardware allowance, a change in the light switching of the multi purpose room and some additional tile in the mens locker and toilet area for Blue Cross/Blue Shield Park building and to locate, excavate and install extra sanitary and water service, along with some minor electrical changes at the Quarry Park shelter building. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve Improvement Contract 87-13 for the final payment and Change Order #1 for the total amount of $15,583 and that the City authorize final acceptance for perpetual maintenance. Agenda Information Memo September 6, 1988, City Council Meeting WATER QUALITY MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE ACCEPT RESIGNATION/APPOINT REPLACEMENT B. 1. Accept Resignation/Appoint Replacement, Water Quality Management Committee --In 1987, the City Council authorized the formation of a staff/citizens committee to help coordinate the preparation of the Comprehensive Water Quality Management Plan. Enclosed on pages '/ through 4; is a listing of those individuals who presently comprise the committee along with individuals who also expressed an interest in being appointed to this committee. Mr. Doug Wilcox has informed the Public Works Director that he has recently relocated out of state and can no longer serve on the committee. Therefore, this vacancy should be filled by Council action. The general background information applications for those citizens who had previously expressed an interest but were not selected in addition to two new citizens who have expressed an interest are being forwarded to the Council for their review and consideration of appointing a replacement. Two options are available to the Council: 1. Appoint the alternate (Richard Starr) to a full committee member. 2. Appoint a new citizen as a full committee member. 3. Fill the vacancy with the alternate with no subsequent appointments. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To accept the resignation of Doug Wilcox from the Water Quality Management Committee and appoint a replacement as appropriate. SPECIAL NOTE: The application for Ms. Agne will be distributed at the meeting on Tuesday. WATER QUALITY MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE A. Committee Members 1. Tom Colbert, Director of Public Works 2. Tim Kelly, Dakota County Soil & Water Conservation Dist. 3. Brian Christiansen, Consultant Hydrologist/Limnologist 4. Mike Mueller, Department of Natural Resources 5. Steven Heiskary, Minnesota Pollution Control Agency 6. Wayne Sames, Park Committee Representative 7. Scott Merkley, Citizen Representative 8. Doug Wilcox, Citizen Representative 9. Paul Burns, Citizen Representative LO. Dick Starr, Citizen Representative, Alternate B. Other Applicants Previously Considered 1. Dick Ouren, 1350 Crestridge Lane C. New Applicants Expressing An Interest 1. Barb Agne, 3050 Shields Lane 2. Karl Heine, 4265 Heine Strasse Lane Citizens Committee Application -Water Quality Plan Name Address Telephone _ (-LA, Vs\ Your specific interest in serving on this committee: \ sZ �c \ a CeS_@r( ' Q ' i . n -. c-.. Q . �`Cl ` N.i3.: •IL C 1,CCo r Relevant experience or education: 1.14 Citizens Committee Application -Water Quality Plan Name J` 1 %lit r --Cl S " are K7 Address F3 ITC C_R'>C ► (d(Jf Lki (t,9a,) i1r1 Telephone L - SSSS Your specific interest in serving on this committee: DJ ,1 .L h;,/c~ 1-1-.k • //7 L_-7-,' , V /) <r� r -•*e F it/i (i)r /A:7 Relevant experience or education: 1 }'i?1 ST (.lct // f)'1<<J c, i P? .Ltfr)e( iA2c1i-Ktelc} iccc)r ONi� CCs 17/1,/115/5 dick Agenda Information Memo September 6, 1988, City Council Meeting CONSENT AGENDA There are nineteen (11 items on the agenda referred to as consent items requiring one (1) motion by the City Council. If the City Council wishes to discuss any of the items in further detail, those items should be removed from the Consent Agenda and placed under Additional Items unless the discussion required is brief. PERSONNEL ITEMS A. PERSONNEL ITEMS: Item 1. Administrative Intern -- Susan DeMarco, the Administrative Intern, has submitted her resignation. Ms. DeMarco has been hired as the Assistant to the City Administrator of the City of St. Anthony. Her last day of employment with the City of Eagan was Friday, August 26. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To accept the resignation of Susan DeMarco and to authorize the filling of the vacant Administrative Intern position. Item 2. Fall Seasonal Park Maintenance Workers -- After interviews, it is the recommendation of Superintendent of Parks VonDeLinde that the following persons be hired as temporary seasonal park maintenance workers for the fall season: Michelle Vadnais, Cary Stevens, Linda Wulff, Steve Schroeder and William Cass. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the hiring of Michelle Vadnais, Cary Stevens, Linda Wulff, Steve Schroeder and William Cass as temporary seasonal park maintenance workers for the fall season. Item 3. Fall Seasonal Forestry Aide -- After interviews, it is the recommendation of Superintendent of Parks VonDeLinde that Gerald Dalke be hired as the temporary seasonal forestry aide for the fall season. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the hiring of Gerald Dalke as the temporary seasonal forestry aide for the fall season. Item 4. Parks & Recreation Student Intern -- For the Council's information, Beth Mondy, an undergraduate student at the University of Minnesota will be interning with the Department of Parks and Recreation for 12 weeks this fall as a part of her course requirements. Ms. Monday will not be an employee of the City of Eagan. Therefore, this item is for the Council's information and no action is required. 7 Agenda Information Memo September 6, 1988, City Council Meeting PLUMBERS LICENSES B. Plumbers Licenses --There are five (5) plumbers licenses that are in order for consideration. All five (5) have complied with City Code provisions regarding licensing requirements. Those companies requesting a license are as follows: 1. Berqual Plumbing 2. Hanson-Kleven Plumbing 3. Huber Plumbing & Heating 4. N.S. Mechanical 5. Northridge Plumbing ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve all five (5) plumbers licenses as presented. Agenda Information Memo September 6, 1988, City Council Meeting PETITION/PARKING RESTRICTIONS/DONALD AVENUE C. Receive Petition/Authorize Parking Restrictions (Donald Avenue North of Letendre Avenue) --Enclosed on page 10 is a petition received from 100% of the property owners on the west side of Donald Avenue north of Letendre Avenue (see map on page / ) requesting the City to install and enforce "No Parking" on the west side of Donald Avenue from Letendre Avenue to the north limits of the cul-de-sac. Public Works Maintenance Division has reviewed this petition and indicated that, if approved, it would facilitate snow removal operations. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To receive the petition and authorize the installation of "No Parking" restrictions on the west side of Donald Avenue north of Letendre Avenue. PETITION /JtPARKtiJ6 -S-TOPP SIGNS I/We, the undersigned hereby petition the City Council of the City of Eagan to installm opRsOs on the west side of Donald Ave. starting at Letendre Ave. (3251 Donald) to the North end of the Donald Ave. Cul -du -sac (3225 Donald). FOR CITY USE ONLY Date Received To Council Approved �t tY 4t t ;-rett—sr+-tir I/We, request this installation for the following reasons: Vehicles are continuing to park directly in front of our mail boxes and paper boxes. Many times we do not receive our newspapers and at times we do not receive our mail. 2. On numerous occasions people have parked in front of our homes and literally cleaned out their cars, dumping beer cans, ash trays, restaraunt containers etc. onto our front lawns. 3. Many people most of them children use this street for walking and biking. With vehicles parked on both sides of the street and the heavy amount of 2 -way traffic on this block, signs should be posted and a lane left open for saf69 sake. 4• Many residents of Valley View Town Houses have spaces to park$ cars. There have been numerous occasions spaces have been open and unsightly vehicles have been parked in front of our houses for a week at a time. We feel signs will help. I/We request that the City Council take this petition request under consideration at its earliest opportunity and that we be informed as to when it is scaeduled so that we may appear in person if we so choose. NAME (Please print and initial) ADDRESS 1. RAJ L2 c' Wx4to t Do v s . /LM12..i Ml les. t, 6/ Ali -(-csn-, 3. ✓►/1i5 u. o., \,rQ- S 5. � 2il/71 1e c: -'71c( 6. �� �� �'S E-r-,85.evnil ll 7. 8. 9. 10. ?,225- Dbtsfs\ W p/&11, 11 t �kt-b P v pA4L, 3233 boivicg,0 61-e_ 2.33 ,..�\e- 3 2 L/j o,„4.,/d e 3 Z5- I 5 040-50- 9' 10 .e L. Ei0 r pVlo L. ° iSpiunler oio -50 Ac. erzwbArz 7.31.113". *.1 111, is, 0.4 121-02 1/4) city of Eagan Street RO.W. 021-03 RESTS NJ 0 ARNONIG 1G11/41S o ST ".3 I 01 60 344 17 ti I% 0% N N. /43 - /6 3 I. . 40, /43 31-6 • 01 11 .: 121-01 , 1.1,J ,e.e 122-01 i Cr a r 104 -01 c:3 c.„.6..... 105-01 : - i i -1, 091-01. 090.-01 0121.101;,.; OL -01, 0y0-01,7...0-4-01 ____Irmi_de az o -oi . 061-01 060-01 ' 051-01 .1 A 052-01 14 3 Lar 3 BLK. 2- DONALD AVE. ROAD EASEMENT DOC. Nes. 391010, 40(3123, rhl I tr,,,V4144.111rs" .L.11:2:art h n 4/6032,416033.. i MEM ,i• •, ,Erallma 17Q''''2.4 NOM Illnahm 474.2'2- , ,,r -,‘ ! IRMO L ROAD EASEMENT PER 3%• ;717 1 i 88./8 DOC- "4 0,...tsx;i376 30 -ET -E r --'?\16' 41— 7 fr , .'" • 7 0 i, • 42 "9' ROAD EASEMENT DOC. NO. 3713273.37 COACHMAN LO BLOC J. k 4 Pr. 2 i so . o %.7 I s as% !SS 31.16 N.SVfQ�'� s0$.Q • 3 A itxp, . • • • iris guere 1 I I ddit ris , \s,...strisigeW •its T 1 as 22 111 2'2" I I CO° v'T .171 F.T:1 I -% 1 1,1.1 •Pel, 50 3 /808 (::15 7 ..0 Agenda Information Memo September 6, 1988, City Council Meeting REQUEST/PARKING RESTRICTION/SIBLEY TERMINAL INDUSTRIAL PARK D. Receive Request/Authorize Parking Restriction (Sibley Terminal Industrial Park) --Enclosed on page /5 is a letter received from Production Parts, Inc., located within the Sibley Terminal Industrial Park requesting the installation and enforcement of "No Parking" restrictions in front of their shipping/loading dock on Terminal Drive. The Public Works Department concurs with this request as it will facilitate semi - truck circulation and operation in front of this facility. Similar problems were previously being experienced in the Eagandale Center Industrial Park until such time that the City Council restricted all onstreet parking within the Industrial Park. This has greatly facilitated the snow removal operation, provided better traffic flow and increased the safety of the operation of the internal traffic circulation of the businesses. According to City Code, all commercial/industrial places of business must provide adequate offstreet parking for their business and operations. Therefore, the Public Works Department would like to strongly suggest that the City Council consider the restriction of all onstreet parking within the Sibley Terminal Industrial Park. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERD ON THIS ITEM: To authorize the installation and enforcement of "No Parking" restrictions within the entire Sibley Terminal Idustrial Park. P P1 PRODUCTION PARTS, INC. 3240 TERMINAL DR. EAGAN, MN. 55121 (612)454-0363 Director Of Public Works City Of Eagan Attn: Tom Colbert Dear Mr. Colbert, 8-12-1988 In making contact with City Hall about getting a couple of No Parking signs put up directly across from our shipping driveway. I was informed to write this letter to you. The problem we are having is the parking of vehicles across the street directly in line with our shipping driveway, thus making it very difficult for our semi trucks to back into our shop safely, not only for safty but also the time the street is blocked to through traffic while the driver is tryingto manover into our drive. If you need answers to any question please call me and I will work with you in anyway. RS/lmg 13 Thank You, Romney Skarp Agenda Information Memo September 6, 1988, City Council Meeting PROJ 554/PETITION/FEASIBILITY REPT & DETAILED PLANS/GESCO E. Project 554, Receive Petition/Order Feasibility Report & Detailed Plans (General Electric Supply Company - Storm Sewer) -- With the proposed development of the General Electric Supply Company located on the northwest corner of West Service Road and Eagandale Industrial Road, a petition has been submitted requesting the installation and extension of storm sewer facilities to service not only this Proposed development but adjacent vacant industrial property to the north. In addition to the feasibility report, the petitioners request the simultaneous preparation of detailed plans and specifications to facilitate and expedite the scheduling of this project. The petitioner has agreed to reimburse the City for all costs incurred if, for some reason, the project is not approved through the formal public hearing process. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To receive the petition for Project 554 (General Electric Supply Company - Storm Sewer) and authorize the feasibility report and detailed plans. PROJ 552/FEASIBILITY REPT/PUBLIC HEARING EAGANDALE CTR INDUSTRIAL PK 3RD ADDN PHASE 2 F. Project 552, Receive Feasibility Report/Order Public Hearing (Eagandale Center Industrial Park 3rd Addition, Lone Oak Business Center, Phase 2 - Storm Sewer & Water Main) --In response to a petition submitted by the developer of the 2nd Phase of the office/warehouse complex located in the southeast corner of Lexington Avenue and Lone Oak Road, the Council authorized the preparation of the feasibility report for the installation of storm sewer and water main facilities to service this proposed phase development as well as the adjacent benefitted properties. This report has now been completed and is being presented to the City Council in consideration of scheduling a formal public hearing. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To receive the feasibility report for Project 552 (Eagandale Center Industrial Park 3rd Addition, Phase 2 - Storm Sewer & Water Main) and order a public hearing to be held on Thursday October 6, 1988. Agenda Information Memo September 6, 1988, City Council Meeting APPROVE PLANS/BIDS/EAGANALE CTR INDUSTRIAL PK 3RD ADDN PHASE 2 & COUNTRY HOLLOW 2ND ADDN/ G. Contract 88-36, Approve Plans/Order Advertisement For Bids (Eagandale Center Industrial Park 3rd Addition, Phase 2, & Country Hollow 2nd Addition - Utilities) --With the Waiver of Hearing and guarantee of all costs incurred for Project 552 previously discussed, detailed plans and specifications were simultaneously prepared to expedite the proposed construction schedule. In addition, detailed plans for the extension of trunk sanitary sewer and storm sewer for the Country Hollow 2nd Addition have also been completed. Both plans have been combined under Contract 88-36 for the economies of scale theory and are being presented to the Council for their review and approval in consideration of ordering an advertisement for competitive bids. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the plans for Contract 88-36 (ECIP 3rd Addition, Phase 2 & Country Hollow 2nd Addition - Utilities) and authorize an advertisement for a bid opening to be held at 11:00 a.m. on Friday, September 30, 1988. CONTRACT 88-35/APPROVE PLANS/AD FOR BIDS STRATFORD OAKS & HIDDEN VALLEY H. Contract 88-35, Approve Plans/Order Ad For Bids (Stratford Oaks - Utilities & Hidden Valley - Trunk Sanitary Sewer) -- Stratford Oaks: Since the developer of the proposed Stratford Oaks Addition waived the public hearing and guaranteed all associated costs, details plans and specifications were simultaneously prepared with the preparation of the feasibility report for the installation of storm and sanitary sewer to service this development. These plans have now been completed and are being presented to the Council in consideration of authorizing the advertisement for competitive bids subject to the project's approval as a part of the public hearing process scheduled later on this agenda. Hidden Valley: With the approval of the proposed Hidden Valley development, it was required to extend the trunk sanitary sewer facility from the existing lift station to this residential development located south of City Hall and east of Pilot Knob Road. These plans have now been completed and are being presented to the Council in consideration of authorizing the advertisement of competitive bids. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the plans for Contract 88-35 (Stratford Oaks - Utilities & Hidden Valley - Trunk Sanitary Sewer) and authorize advertisement for a bid opening to be held at 10:30 a.m., Friday, September 30, 1988. Agenda Information Memo September 6, 1988, City Council Meeting CONTRACT 88-01/CHANGE ORDER #2/FIRE STATION #5 I. Contract 88-01, Approve Chan a Order #2 (Fire Station #5)-- Enclosed on pages 1'7 and I is a description of various items comprising Change Order ,r2 to Contract 88-01 for Fire Station #5. The net result of this Change Order is a deduct of $6,657. All items have been reviewed by the Fire Chief and Public Works Director and found to be in order for favorable Council action. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve Change Order #2 for Contract 88-01 and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute all related documents. r ®® ARTHUR DICKEY ARCHITECTS, INC. ®� arl 49.30 FRANCE AvENUE SOUTH MINNEAPOLIS. MINNESOTA 55410 612-020-3993 PROPOSAL REQUEST ❑ OWNER Q ARCHITECT PROJECT ADDRESS TO: ❑ CON SULTA NTS O CONTRACTOR CITY OF EAGAN FIRE STATION NO. 5 - Galaxie Avenue Eagan, Minnesota ❑ FIELD ❑ OTHER PROJECT NO. 87684 City Contract 88-01 DATE 22 July 1988 EAGAN CONSTRUCTION INC. 1771 Yankee Doodle Road Eagan, MN 55121 PROPOSAL REQUEST NO. Two (2) PROPOSAL REQUEST BY Owner/Architect Please submit an itemized quotation for changes in the Contract Sum and/or Time incidental to proposed modifications to the Contract Documents described herein. THIS IS NOT A CHANGE ORDER NOR A DIRECTION TO PROCEED ::ITH THE .:0';: DESCRIBED HEREIN. DESCRIPTION (see attached Page 2 also) 1. Credit cn brick allowance. DEDUCT:$ 5,266.00 2. Change in Owner's antenna location: Antenna will be mounted on the exterior of the south upper apparatus wall, above the work room. Conduit for antenna to run from Dispatch location shown on Sheet El, though ceiling space aver to Workroom 104, and stubbed up through roof approximately 20 feet west of the upper apparatus corner. Flashing at roof penetration as required. Omit underground conduit to west side of parking lot. DEDUCT : $ 160.00 3. Apparatus Room lockers: Fabricate of steel with continuous punched holes in lieu of expanded metal. Lockers to be 24" wide in lieu of 18"; locker depth to remain 18". Locate 8 lockers on south wall, and 17 lockers cn north wall. ADD: $ 343.00 4. Omit one GRV. Kitchen hood and dryer vent combined into one GRV. DEDUCT: $ 13 5.00 O ATTACHMENTS Eagan Construction Proposal Request No. Two (2) 22 July 1988 Page 2 of 2 5. Refer to Electrical Plan, Sheet El. The ceiling lights, Type A in Room 101 are row switched by switches 3a, b, c. Change the switching of these lights so that they are controlled at three different locations. A. At the door 101B, on the west side, add three four way switches, surface mount. Abandon switch 3a and place the surface box over the former switch outlet. B. At door 101A, on the east side of Room 101, place three surface mounted four way switches an the column next to the door. Run the conduit down to the switches on the surface. C. At the three existing switches in the corridor, at the south center of Room 101, change the switches to 4 -way to accommodate the three location switching points. D. Wire the switches using existing raceway if possible. Surface raceway can be used if necessary. ADD: $ 315.00 6. Omit two retaining walls and the tree and shrub at these retaining walls at the north side of the property. ZVTAL NET CHANGE: DEDUCT: $ 1,754.00 DEDUCT: $ 6,657.00 Agenda information Memo September 6, 1988, City Council Meeting CONTRACT 88-21/CHANGE ORDER #1/CLIFF LAKE CTR J. Contract 88-21, Approve Change Order #1 (Cliff Lake Ctr. - Grading & Utilities) --Subject to the completion of the detailed plans and contract award for the installation of utilities and related grading for the Cliff Lake Centre development, the developer modified the overall development's grading plan resulting in the need to lower the rough grade provided by the developer. With the utilities being already in place (manholes, gate valves, catch basins, etc.), the removal of this excess material (9,500 cubic yards) results in an additional cost of $13,110. All costs associated with this Change Order will be the full responsibility of the developer and is being processed at their specific request. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve Change Order # 1 to Contract 88-21 (Cliff Lake Centre - Grading & Utilities) and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute all related documents. CONTRACT 87-28/CHANGE ORDER #1/WELL #11 K. Contract 87-28, Approve Change Order #1 (Well #11) --While drilling Well #11, the contractor encountered thicker formations requiring extra depth and effort to develop this well according to City standards. The extra time and material results in an additional $32,882 which will be the responsibility of the Utility Enterprise Fund. This Change Order has been reviewed by the Director of Public Works and Superintendent of Utilities and found to be in order for favorable Council action. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve Change Order #1 to Contract 87-28 (Well #11) and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute all related documents. lq Agenda Information Memo September 6, 1988, City Council Meeting CONTRACT 87-28/APPROVE FINAL PAYMENT/ACCEPTANCE/(WELL#11) L. CONTRACT 87-28, Approve Final Payment/Acceptance (Well #11) --The City staff has received a request for final payment from the contractor through the consulting engineering firm (OSM) along with a certification of compliance to City approved plans and specifications for the completion of deep well #11 (Ashbury Road). All final reviews have been performed by representatives of the Public Works Department and found to be in order for formal acceptance. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the 10th and final payment to Keys Well Drilling Company, Inc. in the amount of $24,727.50 and accept the improvement for perpetual maintenance. CONTRACT 88-29/RECEIVE BIDS/AWARD CONTRACT(WELL #13) M. Contract 88-29, Receive Bids/Award Contract (Well #13) --On Friday, August 26, formal bids were received for the construction of Dee Well #13 (Cliff Road at Lake Park Drive). Enclosed on page is a tabulation of the bids received with a comparison to the engineer's estimate. The bids have been evaluated by the consulting engineering firm (BRAA) and found to be in conformance with the bid specification requirements. The low contractor is the same one who recently developed Well #10 (Cliff Road Reservoir) and found to be capable and acceptable performing this work. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To receive the bids for Contract 88-29 (Well #13) and award the contract to E.H. Renner & Sone, Inc. in the amount of $126,715.00 and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute all related documents. DEEP WELL NO. 13 CITY OF EAGAN 1988 BID TIME: 10:30 A.M. BID DATE: AUGUST 26, 1988 CONTRACTORS TOTAL BASE BID 1. E.H. Renner & Sons $ 126,715.00 2. Keys Well Drilling $ 127,775.00 3. Layne Minnesota $ 129,510.00 LOW BID ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE % Over (+) Under (-) E.E. $ 126,715.00 $ 136,000.00 - 6.0% Agenda Information Memo September 6, 1988, City Council Meeting FINAL PLAT/BRIDLE RIDGE 2ND ADDITION N. Final Plat, Bridle Ridge 2nd Addition --The staff has received an application for final plat approval for the Bridle Ridge 2nd Addition located northeast of Braddock Trail and Northview Park Road intersection as shown by the map enclosed on pages 2- -Z5. All conditions of the preliminary plat approved by Council action of April 19, 1988 have been satisfactorily complied with. All final plat application materials have been submitted and reviewed by staff and found to be in order for favorable Council action. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the final plat for the Bridle Ridge 2nd Addition and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute all related documents. m 0 1- W w t- Tei Ale / CO �'. I 1 //+.��`f N / 1 w � / L _ r 1 a -7 L 1. Agenda Information Memo September 6, 1988, City Council Meeting RAHNCLIFF 2ND ADDITION/AUSTIN COMPANIES O. Planned Development Agreement, Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment, Rahncliff 2nd Addition/Austin Companies, Rezoning of 16.08 LB and RB acres to a Commercial Planned Development District and a Preliminary Plat --A public hearing was held by the Advisory Planning Commission at its regular meeting on June 28, 1988, to consider a Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment and rezoning of 5.6 LB and 11.2 RB acres to a Commercial Planned Development District and a preliminary plat entitled Rahncliff 2nd Addition. The APC recommended approval of the applications. At the July 19, 1988 City Council meeting, this item was considered and continued to the August 16 meeting, allowing time for the City Council to receive and review a retail market analysis study. The report was received and reviewed by the City Council at the August 16, 1988 City Council meeting. The aforementioned applications were reviewed at length with the public and discussed by the City Council. Due to the number of questions raised by the audience and City Council and commitment given by the developer, it was recommended by the City Attorney and City Administrator that a development agreement be prepared for City Council consideration prior to any action on the Comprehensive Guide, rezoning or preliminary plat. The development agreement would address the various issues discussed at the August 16 meeting, in addition to the conditions placed on application approval by the Advisory Planning Commission. As a result of this format, no formal action was taken on the Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment, rezoning and preliminary plat until the development agreement is executed by the Austin Companies and City of Eagan. The development agreement was prepared by the City Attorney's office and executed by the developer; therefore, the applications are in order for consideration. Normally, the City Council does not review the specifics of a development agreement and, therefore, a copy is not included in this packet of information. If any member of the City Council would like a copy of the development agreement or pages 43 - 73 of the August 16 City Council packet, please contact this office. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the Comprehensive Guide Plan amendment for Rahncliff 2nd Addition/Austin Companies, rezoning of 16.8 LB and RB acres to a commercial planned development district and a preliminary plat for Rahncliff 2nd Addition per acceptance of the development agreement as prepared by the City staff. Agenda Information Memo September 6, 1988, City Council Meeting CONTRACT 88-9/APPROVE CHANGE ORDER #1/MANOR LAKE ADDITION P. Contract 88-9, Approve Change Order #1 (Manor Lake Addition - Trunk Utilities)-- This Change Order provides for the extension of trunk sanitary sewer and water main to service the second phase of the Manor Lake development identified within the feasibility report for Project 520. The developer has decided to accelerate his phasing schedule allowing the 2nd phase to be incorporated with the 1st phase contract through a Change Order. All costs associated with this Change Order will be financed in accordance with the original feasibility report. This results in a total addition of $37,291.50 to the original contract amount. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve Change Order #1 to Contract 88-9 (Manor Lake Addition - Trunk Utilities) and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute all related documents. CONTRACT 87-20/FINAL PAYMENT/ACCEPTANCE Q. Contract 87-20, Final Payment/ Acceptance (Eagandale Center Industrial Park 8th Addition - Water Main and E -Z Air Park - Storm Sewer) --The staff has received a request for final payment from the contractor for the above referenced improvements through our consulting engineering firm (BRAA) along with a certification of compliance to City approved plans and specifications. All final inspections have been performed by representatives of the Public Works Department and found to be in order for favorable Council consideration of final payment for acceptance and perpetual maintenance. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the 4th and final payment to F.F. Jedlicki, Inc. in the amount of $7,497.92 and authorize the acceptance of the improvements for perpetual City maintenance subject to warranty provisions. a7 Agenda Information Memo September 6, 1988, City Council Meeting CONTRACT 86-17/FINAL PAYMENT/ACCEPTANCE R. Contract 86-17, Final Payment/Acceptance (Sperry Consolidation Facility - Utilities) --The City has received a request for final payment from the contractor via the consulting engineer assigned to this project (BRAA) along with a certification of compliance to City approved plans and specifications for the installation of utilities necessary to service the Sperry Consolidation Facility recently constructed with Tax Increment Finance (TIF) funds. All final inspections have been performed by representatives of the Public Works Department and found to be in order for favorable Council action of formal acceptance for perpetual maintenance. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THESE ITEMS: To approve the 6th and final payment for Contract 86-17 (Sperry Consolidation Facility - Utilities) to Northdale Construction Co., Inc. in the amount of $24,527.51 and authorize the acceptance for perpetual maintenance of related City facilities subject to appropriate warranties. ag Agenda Information Memo September 6, 1988, City Council Meeting EXTENSION OF FINAL PLAT/EAGAN HIGH SCHOOL ADDITION S. Extension of Final Plat Approval, Eagan High School Addition- -On June 7, 1988, the City Council approved the final plat for the Eagan High School Addition and authorized the Mayor and City Clerk to execute all related documents necessary to allow its recording at the County. According to City Ordinance, that final plat approval is valid for only 60 days to allow the recording at the County. With the recent successful rebidding of the final phase of the high school construction, the school district is requesting a building permit. However, since the June 7th final plat approval, the school has not followed through with the requirements necessary to allow the final plat to be released for recording at the County prior to August 7, 1988. Therefore, the previous final plat approval granted by Council action is no longer valid unless the 60 day recording period is extended by Council action. In discussions with the school district, it would be necessary to extend the final plat approval to September 30 to allow them to record this plat at the County. Because of difficulties staff has encountered in the past with trying to insure that all conditions of the platting process are complied with, it is strongly recommended that the building permit not be issued until all outstanding concerns have been resolved and the plat properly recorded at the County. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To extend the final plat approval for the Eagan High School Addition until September 30, 1988. act Agenda Information Memo September 6, 1988, City Council Meeting ii.PUBLIC HEARINGS, VACATION/PUBLIC HEARING/LOT 8/HILLTOP OF EAGAN A. Vacation, Public Hearing (Drainage/Utility Easement -Lot 8, Hilltop of Eagan)to be continued to September 19, 1988-- On August 2, the Council received a Petition to Vacate the blanket drainage and utility easements over the common open space of the condominium development proposed to be located on Lot 8, Hilltop of Eagan/as shown by the sketch and legal description enclosed on page 3 . The public hearing was scheduled for September 6th. However, it was anticipated that the final plat for the replatting of this property into the down zoned single family Berry Ridge Addition would have been processed and approved prior to this public hearing. This would have provided for the required replacement drainage and utility easements necessary to the processing of this petition vacation. However, staff is recommending that the public hearing be held and closed and that formal action be deferred until the September 19th Council meeting subject to the final plat approval. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To close the public hearing and continue consideration for the vacation of public drainage and utility easements (Lot 8, Hilltop of Eagan) to September 19th. SCALE . "_ /DOS E%//l'////a 3ERRy 4,0 N r: %7'1 N a 0 60 J i•i ,1. 1,,,5� / 5--. 62 /5".04" R- 26405 a/ o a SHADED AREA DENOTES REQUESTED \ °= AREA TO BE VACATED 12 A� 273.88 TI N81' !7' o/" E DRAINAGE & UTILITY EASEMENT TO BE VACATED All that part of Lot 8, Block 1, Hilltop of Eagan, Dakota County, Minnesota described as follows: Commencing at the most southwest corner of said Lot 8; thence on an assumed bearing North 00 degrees 05 minutes 35 seconds East, along the westerly line of said Lot 8, a distance of 106.51 feet; thence northerly continuing along said westerly line, a distance of 129.92 feet along a tangential curve concave to the west, having a radius of 557.02 feet and a central angle of 13 degrees 21 minutes 50 sec- onds; thence North 81 degrees 17 minutes 07 seconds East, not tangent to the last described curve, a distance of 273.88 feet; thence North 47 degrees 18 minutes 24 seconds East a distance of 52.71 feet; thence North 00 degrees 21 minutes 39 seconds East a distance of 107.00 feet to the point of beginning of the parcel to be described; thence North 89 degrees 38 minutes 21 seconds West a distance of 356.74 feet to said westerly line of Lot 8; thence northerly along said westerly line, a distance of 13.33 feet along a non-tangential curve concave to the east, having a radius of 333.33 feet, a central angle of 02 degrees 17 minutes 30 seconds and a chord which bears North 00 degrees 47 minutes 06 seconds West; thence North 00 degrees 21 minutes 39 seconds East, tangent to the last described curve and continuing along said westerly line, a distance of 297.95 feet to the most northwest corner of said Lot 8; thence easterly along the northerly line of said Lot 8, a distance of 93.68 feet along a non-tangential curve, concave to the south having a radius of 237.46 feet, a central angle of 22 degrees 36 minutes 13 seconds and a chord which bears South 60 degrees 01 minute 23 seconds East; thence South 48 degrees 43 minutes 16 seconds East tangent to the last described curve and continuing along said northerly line, a distance of 50.00 feet; thence easterly, continuing along said northerly line a distance of 254.63 feet along a tangential curve, concave to the north having a radius of 264.05 feet and a central angle of 55 degrees 15 minutes 04 seconds; thence South 00 degrees 21 minutes 39 seconds West, not tangent to the last described curve, a distance of 176.23 feet to the point of beginning and there terminating. Agenda Information Memo September 6, 1988, City Council Meeting PROJECT 549/PUBLIC HEARING/STRATFORD OAKS B. Public Hearing, Stratford Oaks (Sanitary & Storm Sewer) -- On August 2nd, the Council received a feasibility report for the installation of sanitary and storm sewer facilities necessary to service the proposed multiple residential development of Stratford Oaks located in the southwest corner of Thomas Lake Road and Diffley Road (County Road 30). Enclosed on pages 33 through U7 are copies of that feasibility report for the Council's information and reference during the public hearing. All notices have been published in the legal newspaper and sent to all potentially affected property owners informing them of this public hearing. The consulting engineer and Public Works Director will present the project details and be available for any questions that may arise. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To close the public hearing and approve/deny Project 549 (Stratford Oaks - Sanitary and Storm Sewer). Be rt cr Sxrattord Oaks Utility improvements Project No. 549 Eagan Minnesota 1988 File No. 49465 33 y t Bonestroo Rosene Anderlik & r= . Associates Engineers & Architects August 2, 1988 Otto G Bonestroo, PE Robert W. Rosene, PE Joseph C Anderlik, PE Bradford A Lemberg, PE Richard E ruiner, PE. James C Olson, PE Glenn R Cook, PE. Thomas E. Noyes, P.E Robert G Schunicht, PE Marvin L Sorvala, PE Honorable Mayor and City Council City of Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55122 Re: Stratford Oaks Sanitary and Storm Sewer Improvements Project No. 549 File No. 49465 Dear Mayor and Council: Enclosed is our K•s th A Gordon, PE :'rcnard W. Foster, PE Dcnald C Burgardt, PE. Jerry A Bourdon, P.E Mark A Hanson, PE Ted K. Field, PE. Michael T Pautmann, PE Robert R Pfetrerle, PE. David 0 Loskota, PE. hr,.mas fin•' I'eterson. PE Michael C. Lynch, PE Jaynes R. Maland, P.E Kenneth P Anderson, PE Keith A Bachmann, PE Mark R Rolfs, PE Robert C Russek, A 1 A. Thomas E Angus, PE Howard A Sanfcrd, PE r harles A. Erickson Leo M. Pawelsky Harlan M Olson Susan M Eberhn Mark A. Serp report for Stratford Oaks Sanitary and Storm Sewer Improve- ments, Project No. 549. This report covers sanitary and storm sewers and in- cludes a preliminary assessment roll. We would be pleased to meet with the council and other interested parties at a mutually convenient time to discuss any aspects of this report. Yours very truly, BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK &.ASSOCIATES, INC. Mark. Hanson MAH:li Approved by: Date: RPT49465 I hereby certify that this report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Registered Professional Engineer under the laws of the/State of Minnesota. Mark A. Hanson Date: August 2, 1988 Reg. No. 14260 public Jorks 2335 West Highway 36 • St. Paul, Minnesota 5511 • 612-636-4600 3 SCOPE: This project provides for the construction of sanitary and storm sewer serving Stratford Oaks. Stratford Oaks is located in the southwest corner of Co. Rd. No. 30 and Thomas Lake Road and includes 296 townhome units. The townhomes consist of 25-8 unit buildings and 6-16 unit buildings. FEASIBILITY AND RECOMMENDATIONS: The project as outlined herein is feasible from an engineering standpoint and is in accordance with the Master Sanitary Sewer and Storm Sewer Plans for the City of Eagan. The project can best be carried out as in one contract. DISCUSSION: Sanitary Sewer - Sanitary sewer proposed herein includes an 8" diameter sani- tary sewer constructed along the westerly side of Thomas Lake Road from Clem- son Drive as shown on the attached drawing. The sanitary sewer is designed only to serve Stratford Oaks. The sanitary sewer will connect to an existing 8" sanitary sewer in the newly constructed Boulder Ridge development which is properly sized to serve Stratford Oaks. Boulevard restoration north of Clemson Drive and patching in Thomas Lake Road is also required. It is assumed Thomas Lake Road will be open cut. The sanitary sewer will be constructed to the westerly edge of the Williams Pipeline easement. Storm Sewer - Storm sewer proposed herein includes extending an existing 12" RCP storm sewer in Thomas Lake Road at minimum grade to the internal pond located in Stratford Oaks. The internal pond for purposes of this report is designated as Pond BP -5a. Listed below are design considerations for Pond BP -5a in Stratford Oaks. Drainage Storage ;dornal gater High Uater Outflow .rea Requirement vel Level (cfs) Pend BP -5a 38.3 acs. 6.9 ac -ft. 898 903.5 3 cfs R:?T49465 Page 1. The outflow requirement for Pond BP -5a represents the capacity in the ex- isting 12" RCP. Due to the elevation of the existing 12" RCP, it's anticipat- ed approximately 1' of water will stand in the ponding area. Storm sewer proposed herein is shown on the attached drawing. EASEMENT: No easements are required for this project. All work is included in this development or on public right-of-way. AREA TO BE INCLUDED: ASSESSMENT AREA NW 1/4, SECTION 28 Parcel 010-25 (Stratford Oaks) Parcel 010-26 (Stratford Oaks) THOMAS LAKE HEIGHTS Outlot B COST ESTIMATE: Detailed cost estimates are presented in Appendix A located at the back of this report and are summarized as follows: Sanitary Sewer $ 45,050 Storm Sewer 26,980 TOTAL PROJECT COST $ 72,030 The total project cost is estimated at $72,030 which includes contingen- cies and all related overhead but does not include any costs associated with easement acquisition. Overhead costs are estimated at 30Z and include legal, engineering, administration and bond interest. ASSESSMENTS: Assessments are proposed to he levied against the benefited property. A preliminary assessment roll is included at the back of this re- port in Appendix B. The assessments will be spread over 10 years. The inter- est rates will be based upon the bond sale issue used to finance this project. RPT49465 Page 2. 3( SANITARY SEWER: Sanitary sewer proposed herein is considered lateral and is proposed to be assessed on a front foot basis against the existing parcels to be platted as Stratford Oaks. The allocation of this assessment with the platting of the property should be on an area basis or a per unit basis as defined in the related Development Agreement. Trunk area sanitary sewer was previously assessed. STORM SEWER: Storm sewer proposed herein is considered trunk. It is proposed to assess the area shown on the attached drawing trunk area storm sewer in accordance with City of Eagan fee schedule for 1988. TRUNK ASSESSMENT RATES: Trunk assessment rates established in the 1988 City of Eagan fee schedule proposed to be assessed as part of this project are as follows: Storm Sewer Trunk Area - Multi -Family $0.070/sq.ft. REVENUE: Revenue sources to cover the cost of this project are listed below: SANITARY SEWER Project Cost Revenue Balance Lateral $ 45,050 Lateral Assessment --- $ 45,050 $ 45,050 $ 45,050 -0- STORM SEWER Trunk $ 26,980 Trunk Area Assessment $ 86,061 $ 26,980 $ 85,061 +$59,081 TOTAL BALANCE +$59,081 The anticipated project balance is +$59,081. Page 3. RPT49465 PROJECT SCHEDULE Present Feasibility Report Public Hearing Approve Plans and Specifications Open Bids/Award Contract Construction Completion Final Assessment Hearing First Payment Due with Real Estate Taxes Page 4. RPT49465 August 2, 1988 September 6, 1988 September 5, 1988 Fall, 1988 Fall, 1988 Summer, 1989 May, 1990 APPENDIX A PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE STRATFORD OAKS UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT NO. 549 A.) SANITARY SEWER 1,300 Lin.ft. 8" PVC Sanitary Sewer in pl. @ $13.00/1.f. $16,900 6 Each Std. MH w/cstg. @ $1,000.00/ea. 6,000 20 Lin.ft. MH depth greater than 8' dp. in pl. @ $60.00/1.f. 1,200 1 Each Connect to existing MH @ $500.00/ea. 500 1,300 Lin.ft. Improved pipe foundation @ $1.00/1.f. 1,300 LUMP SUM Street repair @ $2,000.00/L.S. 2,000 LUMP SUM Boulevard restoration @ $2,000.00/L.S. 2,000 1.2 Acres Seed w/fertilizer & mulch @ $1,500.00/ac. 1,800 1,300 Lin.ft. Mechanical trench compaction @$1.00/1.f. 1,300 Total $33,000 +5% Contingencies 1,650 $34,650 +30Z Legal, Engrng., Admin. & Bond Interest 10,400 TOTAL SANITARY SEWER $45,050 B ) STORM SEWER 160 Lin.ft. 12" RCP Storm sewer, 0'-15' dp. in pl. @ $28.00/1.f. $ 4,480 210 Lin.ft. 12" RCP Storm sewer, 15'-30' dp. in pl. @ $45.00/1.f. 9,450 2 Each Std. 4' dia. MH w/cstgs. @ $1,000.00/each 2,000 40 Lin.ft. MH depth greater than 8' dp. @ $60.00/1.f. 2,400 1 Each 12" RCP apron w/trash guard @ $400.00/each 400 1 Each Connect the existing 12" Storm sewer @ $500.00/each 500 160 Lin.ft. Improved pipe foundation @ $1.00/1.f. 160 370 Lin.ft. Mechanical trench compaction @ $1.00/1.f. 370 Total $19,760 +5Z Contingencies 990 $20,750 +30% Legal, Engrng., Admin. & Bond Interest 6,230 TOTAL STORM SEWER $26,980 RPT49465 Page 5. 3� APPENDIX B PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL STRATFORD OAKS UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT NO. 549 A.) SANITARY SEWER Parcel Assessable Description Footage Rate/F.F. Total Assessment NW 1/4, SECTION 28 Parcel 010-26 150 $41.33 $ 6,200 Parcel 010-25 590 41.33 24,385 THOMAS LAKE HEIGHTS Outlot B 350 $41.33 $14,465 1,090 $45,050 B.) STORM SEWER - TRUNK AREA Parcel Area Credit Assessable Rate/ Total Description (Sq.ft.) (Sq.ft.) Area (Sq.ft.) Sq.ft. Assessment Parcel 010-26 1,236,670 Pond (43,560) 954,490 $0.070 $66,814 Street 20Z Parcel 010-25 387,240 Pond (43,560) 274,950 0.070 19,247 Street 20Z RPT49465 Page 6. $86,061 SUMMARY PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL STRATFORD OAKS Parcel Sanitary Storm Sewer Total Description Sewer Trunk Area Assessment NW 1/4, SECTION 28 Parcel 010-25 $24,385 Parcel 010-26 6,200 THOMAS LAKE HEIGHTS Outlot B RPT49465 $19,247 $43,632 66,814 73,014 $14,465 $14,465 Page 7. q� r 1\ CO.0„F__3-4/' RD• 30 010-25 PROPOSED \ 8" SANITARY \ SEWER ` / \ , / / N • \ ljllllllh�LI 1 \ -, 010-26 \`\ OUTLOT i STRATFORD OAKS SANITARY SEWER PROJECT NO. 549 EAGAN, MINNESOTA 13on.atroo Rood's)* Ander ilk 6 AatocSaiss u..k+••+• a arwua.ts t. rod, iibw.as Lcomm.49465 Date: FIC. No. 1 J 11 CO. RD. 30 013-25 PONDBP- 5 PROPOSE D I2" STORM SEWER v„.z.EX. STDRM let SEWCR7/ 1 1 I HEINE LAKE BP -5 010-26 OUT LOT B Scale: I" = 2001 STRATFORD OAKS STORM SEWER PROJECT NO. 549 EAGAN, MINNESOTA Monosiree ••- Paseesess Anderlik i eta. 1.2mewr... a a.eu�.ao A. Iddieseasia Dote: 1 Comm.4.9465 ) IC). No. 2 �3 COUNTY ROAD No. 30 010-75 :\•. ,\ N;:•: N Scale 1" = 300' THOMAS LAKE HEIGHTS BAYLOR CO ( URr V TRUNK STORM ASSES .MENT .AREA STRATFORD OAKS ASSESSMENTS TRUNK AREA STORM SEWER PROJECT No. 459 EAGAN, MINNESOTA n 3onestroo Romano - Anderlik 3 Associates .°npineers ti Architects Of. r*ul. Minnesota r Gate: AUG 2, 38Y- Comm. 8I / Comm. •,9465 Fig. No. 3 1 Agenda Information Memo September 6, 1988, City Council Meeting PROJECT 545/PUBLIC HEARING/CLEARVIEW ADDITION C. Project 545, Public Hearing (Clearview Addition - Streets) -- On August 2nd, the Council received a feasibility report for the installation of street improvements to the Clearview Addition incorporating Lenore Lane and Beecher Drive. A public hearing wa subsequently sc eduled for September 6th. Enclosed on pages r through S5 is a copy of the feasibility report for the Council's information and reference during this public hearing. All notices have been published in the legal newspaper and sent to all potentially affected property owners informing them of this public hearing. In addition, the Public Works Director and consulting engineer helc'L a neighborhood meeting on Thursday, September 1st to specifically discuss the proposed improvements with the affected property owners. An oral status report of that meeting will be provided by the Public Works Director as a part of this public hearing process. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve/modify/deny Project 545 (Clearview Addition - Streets) and, if approved, authorize the preparation of detailed plans and specifications. SPECIAL NOTE: A neighborhood meeting was held the afternoon of ,eptember 1 to discuss the above project. Enclosed on page(s) b <0 is a summary prepared by the Director of Public Works. L Report for Clearview Addition Street Improvements Project No. 545 Eagan, Minnesota 1988 File No. 49464 4(0 Bonestroo Rosene Anderlik & Associates Engineers & Architects July 21, 1988 Honorable Mayor and Council City of Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55122 Re: Clearview Addition Street Improvements Project No. 545 File No. 49464 Dear Mayor and Council: Otto G. Bonestroo, PE. Robert W. Rosene, P.E. Joseph C AnderIik, RE. Bradford A. Lemberg, P.E Richard E. Turner, P.E. James C. Olson, PE. Glenn R. Cook, P.E. Thomas E. Noyes, P.E. Robert G. Schumcht, PE. Marvin L. Sorvala, P.E. Keith A Gordon. PE. Richard W Foster, PE Donald C. Burgardt, P.E. Jerry A. Bourdon, P.E. Mark A. Hanson, PE Ted K. Field, PE. Michael T Rautmann, P.E. Robert R. Pfefferle, P.E. David 0 Loskota, P.E. Thomas W. Peterson, P.E. Michael C. Lynch, PE James R Maland, PE. Kenneth P. Anderson, RE Keith A. Bachmann, PE. Mark R Rolfs, P.E. Robert C. Russek, A I.A. Thomas E. Angus, RE Howard A. Sanford, P.E. Charles A. Erickson Leo M. Pawelsky Harlan M. Olson Susan M. Eberlin Mark A. Seip Enclosed is our report for Clearview Addition, Project No. 545. This report covers street improvements and includes a preliminary assessment roll. We would be pleased to meet with the Council and other interested parties at a mutually convenient time to discuss any aspect of this report. Your very truly, BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES, INC. Mark Hanson MAH / j e o Approved by: Date: 1(.77'.`"111-4' Department of -Public Works I hereby certify that this report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Registered Professional Engineer under the laws of the State o/f Minnesota. Mark A. Hanson Date: ilZ//r Reg. No. 14260 2335 West Highway 36 • St. Paul, Minnesota 55113 • 612-636-4600 SCOPE: This project provides for the upgrading of the streets in the Clear - view Addition. The Clearview Addition is located in the northeast quadrant of Blackhawk Road and Cliff Road and includes large single family lots with an average street frontage of 200 front feet. Consideration for this project is the result of a petition received from the residents in Clearview Addition and Clearview 3rd Addition. This is the same project that was presented to the Council under Project 472 at a public hearing on May 5, 1986 which was subse- quently denied. However, it was agreed that Beecher Drive between Blackhawk Road and Walnut Lane would be upgraded to City standards and assessed to Lot 6 Block 2 Clearview Addition. FEASIBIITY AND RECOMMENDATION: This project is feasible from an engineering standpoint and is in accordance with the Master Street Plan for the City of Eagan. The project can best be carried out as one contract. The City of Eagan Public Works Department is recommending very strongly that the project be approved. The existing gravel streets in the Clearview Addition cause additional maintenance for the Public Works Department in comparison with paved streets in other subdivisions. The additional mainte- nance includes periodic grading of the streets, placement of additional gravel, and placement of calcium chloride for dust control at an estimated cost of $5,000 to $6,000/yr. In addition, the gravel continues to erode in the gutters thus causing the existing storm sewer system at Lenore Lane and Beecher Drive to continually fill and plug with gravel, debris, etc. To continually clean these storm sewers is not only very time consuming and costly, but can also be very damaging to the existing storm sewer and the pond which the storm sewer discharges to. RPT49464 Page 1. �8 EISCUSSION: Streets within the Clearview Addition proposed to be paved as part of this project are Beecher Drive and Lenore Lane as shown on the at- tached drawing. These streets are presently 34' wide gravel streets that were constructed after the installation of utilities in 1978. The gravel base was constructed 6" thick at that time. The streets were constructed to a design grade in anticipation of concrete curb and gutter and bituminous surfacing being constructed shortly thereafter. However, Project No. 281 which proposed the same improvements as presented herein was also denied at the public hear- ing on September 18, 1979 and as a result the improvements were not construc- ted. As previously indicated, the same project was also discussed as Project 472 at a public hearing on May 5, 1986 where a petition was submitted from the residents in Eden Addition requesting Beecher Drive be upgraded to Blackhawk Road which also included the remaining streets in Clearview Addition. However that project was denied except for Beecher Drive between Walnut Lane and Blackhawk Road. Therefore, it is proposed as part of this project to upgrade Lenore Lane and the remaining portion of Beecher Drive with concrete curb and gutter and bituminous surfacing to a 34' width. Also included is restoration of the existing driveways and boulevard areas. Adjustment of existing manholes, catch basins and gate valves is also included. In addition, it is proposed to provide an additional 4" thick aggregate base which will include grading and subbase preparation. However, as part of the preparation of the detailed plans and specification, it may be determined that the amount of grading and additional aggregate base construction may either have to be increased or decreased dependent on the results from cross sectional survey work and soil borings that will be taken. R.PT49464 Page 2. LkG\ AREA TO BE INCLUDED: CLEARVIEW ADDITION CLEARVIEW 3RD ADDITION Lot 2-5, Block 1 Lot 2-3, Block 1 Lot 7-14, Block 2 Lot 1-9, Block 3 CLEARVIEW 3RD ADDITION Lot 1-3, Block 1 COST ESTIMATE: A detailed cost estimate is presented in Appendix A located at the back of this report. The total estimated project cost is $135,670 which includes contingencies and all related overhead. Overhead costs are estimated at 30Z and include legal, engineering, administration and bond interest. When Project 472 was approved and partially assessed to Lot 6, Blk. 2, Clearview Addition, it was with the understanding that the unassessed portion carried by the City would be included with the cost of a future street improvement and spread equally on a per lot basis. ASSESSMENTS: Assessments are proposed to be levied against the benefited property. A preliminary assessment roll is included in Appendix B located at the back of this report. Final assessable costs will be determined based on final costs. The assessments will be spread over 20 years unless modified at the time of the public hearing. The interest rate will be based upon the latest bond sale used to finance this project. It is proposed to assess the total cost of the street on a per lot basis regardless of the amount of street frontage per lot. The lots proposed to be assessed are shown on the drawing located at the back of this report. Page 3. RPT49464 The estimated cost per lot for each of the previous related projects are as follows: Prosect Public Hearing Cost/Lot 281 9-18-79 $2,280.00 472 5-5-86 5,972.00 545 9-6-88 6,042.00 Based on an estimated assessment of $6,042.00, the following payment schedule would result assuming a 20 year spread at an estimated interest rate of 9Z if the homeowner elects to include the assessment on their property tax statement. Cost/Year Cost/Month 1st Year $846 $70 20th Year $329 $27 REVENUE SOURCES: Revenue sources to cover the cost of this project are as follows: Proj. Cost Revenue Balance Street $ 135,670 Unassessed Cost from Proj. 472 9,334 Street Assessment $ 145,004 - 0 - $ 145,004 $ 145,004 All costs are proposed to be assessed, therefore, no funds are required from the major street fund. Page 4. RPT49464 PROJECT SCHEDULE Present Feasibility Report Public Hearing Approve Plans & Specifications Open Bids/Award Contract Construction Completion Final Assessment Hearing First Payment Due with Real Estate Taxes Page 5. RPT49464 August 2, 1988 September 6, 1988 January, 1989 February, 1989 July, 1989 September, 1989 May 1990 APPENDIX A PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE CLEARVIEW ADDITION STREET IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT NO. 545 9,500 Sq.yds. Subbase preparation @ $0.60/sq.yd. $ 5,700 400 Cu.yds. Subgrade correction @ $3.00/cu.yd. 1,200 200 Cu.yds. Select granular borrow @ $6.00/cu.yd. 1,200 2,400 Ton Class 5 aggregate base @ $5.00/ton 12,000 740 Ton 2331 Bituminous base course @ 12.00/ton 8,880 740 Ton 2341 Bituminous wear course @ $13.00/ton 9,620 86 Ton Bituminous material for mixture @ $160.00/ton 13,760 420 Gals. Bituminous material for tack coat @ $1.50/gal. 630 4,740 Lin.ft. B618 Concrete curb and gutter @ $5.00/lin.ft. 23,700 25 Each Driveway restoration @ $500.00/each 12,500 20 Each Adjust MH, CB, & GV box @ $150.00/each 3,000 4,000 Sq.yds. Sod w/topsoil @ $1.80/sq.yd. 7,200 RPT49464 Total $ 99,390 +5Z Contingencies 4,970 $104,360 +30Z Legal, Engrng., Admin. & Bond Interest 31,310 TOTAL $135,670 Project 472 Unassessed Costs 9,3334 TOTAL $145,004 Page 6. 53 APPENDIX B PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL CLEARVIEW ADDITION STREET IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT NO. 545 Parcel No. of Description Lots Cost/Lot Total Assessment CLEARVIEW ADDITION Lot 2-5, Block 1 4 $6,042 $24,168 Lot 7-14, Block 2 8 6,042 48,336 Lot 1-9, Block 3 9 6,042 54,378 CLEARVIEW 3RD ADDITION Lot 1-3, Block 1 3 $6,042 $ 18,126 TOTAL 24 $145,008 RPT49464 Page 7. 5� o t a I o c BLACKHAWK 5 ASSESSMENT BOUNDARY 12 PROPOSED 7 STREET IMPROVEMENT C w z 13 J Scale: I"=200' w cr 0 14 z w CLIFF ROAD (Co. Rd. .No. 32) -- i 1 c--, 1 CLEARVI EW ADD IT ION STREET IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT NO. 545 EAGAN, MINNESOTA Date: 7-13-68� J Comm. 49464 1 3ONESTROO, ROSENE. ANDERLIK a ASSOCIATES. INC. Consulting Engineers 3t. Paul, Minn. FIG. No. I SS MEMO TO: MAYOR & CITY COUNCILMEMBERS THOMAS L HEDGES, CITY ADMINISTRATOR FROM: THOMAS A COLBERT, DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS DATE: SEPTEMBER 2, 1988 SUBJECT: PROJECT 545 PUBLIC HEARING CLEARVIEW ADDN - STREETS NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING STATUS REPORT On Thursday, September 1, 1988, at 7:00 p.m., the Public Works Director and consulting engineers attended a neighborhood meeting organized by and held at the home of Mr. & Mrs. Floyd Forsberg, 4555 Lenore Lane. During that meeting, considerable time was taken to explain the details of the project. The following points are issues that the neighborhood may be pursuing specifically during the public hearing: * Request reduction of street width from 32' to 28' (face of curb to face of curb). * * Delete the inclusion of the $9,334 unassessed cost from Project 472 which provided for the upgrading of Beecher Drive from Blackhawk Road to Clover Lane entrance to the Eden Addition. Subsequent to the preparation of the feasibility report, it was discovered that Lot 4, Block 3 (S.E. corner of Beecher and Lenore) has been subdivided into two lots. Should each of these lots be assessed a one-half lot equivalent versus their proposed full lot equivalent per the attached addendum? These issues would require specific action by the Council as a part of approving the project through the public hearing process. The staff would not have any objections or see any problems associated with addressing these items either way. I will be available to answer additional specific questions as appropriate at the public hearing on September 6th. Respectfully submitted, 4111!!" Nomas A. Colbert, P. E. Director of Public Works TAC/ j f 5'6 Agenda Information Memo September 6, 1988, City Council Meeting PROJECT 542/PUBLIC HEARING/ALDEN POND -STREETS & UTILITIES D. Project 542, Public Hearing (Alden Pond - Streets & Utilities) --On August 2, 1988, the Council received a feasibility report for installation of streets and utilities within the proposed Alden Pond development located in the southeast corner of Coachmen and Four Oaks Roads. A public hearing was scheduled for September 6th to discuss the proposed improvements discussed in the feasibility report included on pages through 77 for the Council's information and reference during the public hearing. All notices have been published in the legal newspaper and sent to all potentially affected property owners informing them of this public hearing. The Public Works Director and consulting engineer (OSM) will be available to discuss the details of this project and answer any related questions. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To close the public hearing and approve/deny Project 542 (Alden Pond - Streets & Utilities). Report For Alden Pond Utility and Street Improvements, Eagan, Minnesota City Project No. 542 August, 1988 Comm. No. 4210 Orr Schelen Mayeron & Associates, Inc. Engineers ■ Surveyors ■ Planners 52 August 2, 1988 Honorable Mayor and Council City of Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, Minnesota 55122 Re: Alden Pond Townhomes Utility and Street Improvements and Trailway Project No. 542 OSM Commission No. 4210 Dear Mayor and Council: Transmitted herewith is our report for Alden Pond Townhomes Utility and Street Improvements and Trailway Project No. 542. This report covers utility and street construction for Alden Pond Townhomes and a trailway along both Coachman Road and Four Oaks Road. We would be happy to discuss this report with all interested parties at your convenience. Please give us a call if you have any questions. Sincerely, ORR-SCHELEN-MAYERON & ASSOCIATES, INC 717 Robert D. Frigaard, P.E. Associate RDF:mlj Attachment I hereby certify that this report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Registered Professional Engineer under the laws of the .te of Minnesota. 1.0 __n Robert D. rigaard, P.E. Date: August 2, 1988 Reg. No. 7285 Approved by: Department of Public Works Date: s� FEASIBILITY REPORT AND ESTIMATE OF COST ALDEN POND TOWNHOMES UTILITY AND STREET IMPROVEMENTS AND TRAILWAY PROJECT NO. 542 EAGAN, MINNESOTA SCOPE This project includes construction of sanitary sewer, water main, storm sewer, streets and trailway to serve Alden Pond Townhomes. Alden Pond Townhomes comprises 213 two and three bedroom rental units contained in two blocks. Alden Pond Townhomes is located east of Coachman Road and south of Four Oaks Road with its east side abutting the Unisys property. FEASIBILITY AND RECOMMENDATIONS From an engineering standpoint, the project is feasible and is in compliance with the Master Utility and Street Plans and the Comprehensive Storm Sewer Plan for the City of Eagan. The layout used for this report was obtained from the developer's engineer. DISCUSSION Outlined below is a discussion of how sanitary sewer, watermain, sanitary sewer and water services, storm sewer, streets, lighting, and trailways will be provided to service this area. The cost for these improvements will be assessed in full to the Alden Pond Townhomes subdivision located on Lot 1, Block 1, and Lot 1, Block 2 Alden Pond Townhomes. The existing parcel numbers for the above subdivision are the Northwest Quarter of Section 9, Parcel #013-31, and the Southwest Quarter of Section 9, Parcel #015-51. A. SANITARY SEWER: Service to the project will be provided by incorporating two separate sewer systems. The first system utilizes an existing 15" R.C.P. trunk which traverses the property east to west within the southern third of the property. The proposed 8" lateral lines will be spread out into a random pattern through the townhomes minimizing the length of lateral line required. Connection to existing line will be made at two existing manholes. The second system will pick up the remaining townhomes with 8" lateral lines and will flow into an existing 8" P.V.C. line located within Four Oaks Road. All lateral sanitary sewer lines are proposed to be 8" in diameter. 4210 -1- 6o B. WATER MAIN: The proposed water main system will consist of primarily 6" water mains with a small portion of 8" main. The water main will cross proposed Alden Court at three locations in order to provide looping and hydrant accessability. Hydrants will be located throughout the townhomes to complete fire protection specifications. The property will be served through four separate connections to existing water mains. An 8" wet tap will provide the connection to an existing 16" water main located on Four Oaks Road. An 8" wet tap and two existing 6" stubs will be Jsed for connection to an existing 18" water main in Coachman Road. The Alden Pond Townhomes will experience residual and static water pressures of approximately 60 and 80 psi, respectively. C. SERVICES: Sanitary sewer and water service are proposed to be constructed to a point 10' from the outermost section of each proposed building. The line will be parallel to the outermost section of the proposed building and will not vary with the attached building sections. Sanitary sewer service and water service lines are proposed to be 4 -inch and 1 -inch, respectively. Several of the townhomes will be required to use a service saddle for connection to the existing sewer line. All other services will be served by proposed sewer and water lines. D. STORM SEWER: Alden Pond Townhomes will be divided into two separate systems for storm drain control. The northern third of the project will have storm sewer draining into a small pond located at the corner of Four Oaks Road and Coachman Road. The outlet for the pond will have a control structure to limit the flow into the existing system in Four Oaks Road. The south two-thirds of the project will have a storm sewer network outletting into Alden Pond. A portion of the existing 36" R.C.P. storm sewer line will be redesigned to better fit the proposed townhome layout. An outlet structure on the end of the 36" pipe will be utilized to limit the outflow to 5 cfs. All storm drainage from the townhome parking lots will be captured by the above mentioned systems. The storm sewer systems are sized to adequately handle the 5 year storm. E. STREET: Street construction for Alden Pond Townhomes will consist of a 32 footwide street constructed to a 7 ton residential design thickness based on existing soil conditions. Due to poor soils on site, the street section will be increased from a granular equivalent of 13 inches to a granular equivalent of 22 inches. The proposed street construction will include aggregate base, bituminous surfacing, concrete curb and gutter, restoration of boulevards and concrete driveway approaches. F. LIGHTING: The street and interior lighting for this project was designed in a manner similar to that requested by Rosewood Development. The street and interior 4210 -2- lights will be identical. These lights will consist of the Eagan standard resi- dential post top, per standard plate 700, with a 100 watt high pressure sodium luminaire. The street lights along Alden Court are spaced at 300 foot intervals from Coachman Road to Four Oaks Road. The Alden Pond Townhomes are located within the NSP service area. NSP will design and construct the lighting plan for this area. Additionally, NSP will also set up an operation and maintenance program serving the system. The program will have a monthly service charge for maintenance and power use. G. TRAILWAY: An 8' bituminous trailway will be located outside the property line along Coachman Road and inside the property line along Four Oaks Road. An easement will need to be obtained for the trailway along Four Oaks Road. EASEMENTS Permanent drainage and utility easements will be obtained for all utilities located out of the street right-of-way. The trailway located along Four Oaks Road will require dedication of permanent easement due to its location within the Alden Pond Townhome property. Additionally, a two acre easement should be allotted for the portion of Alden Pond located on Unisys property. COST ESTIMATES A detailed cost estimate can be found at the back of this report in Appendix A. A summary of these costs is shown below: A. Sanitary Sewer $150,000 B. Water Main 176,000 C. Services 133,800 D. Storm Drain 80,200 E. Streets 146,800 F. Lighting 36,200 G. Trailway 13.400 TOTAL ESTIMATED PROJECT COST $736,400 The above referenced total estimated project cost includes a contingency factor and all related overhead. Overhead costs are estimated at 25% and include legal, engineering, administrative and bond interest. 4210 -3- 6,-- ASSESSMENTS Assessments are to be levied against the benefitted property as shown on the attached drawings and in the preliminary assessment roll in Appendix B. The final assessable costs will be based on final costs including related ad- ministration expenses. The assessments will be spread over 5 years at an interest rate determined by the bond sale financing of this project. Due to the lack of lots in the addition, the proposed assessments will be spread over two individual lots. The assessments are levied utilizing the square footage of each lot. All final assessment obligations will be calculated based on the quantities and dimensions of the final plat and in accordance with the rates in effect at the time of the final plat approval. A summary of the proposed assessments for each lot is shown on the following page. PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL LOT 1, BLOCK 1 LOT 1, BLOCK 2 TOTAL Sanitary Sewer $ 90,896 $ 59,104 $150,000 Watermain 106,651 69,349 176,000 Services 81,080 52,720 133,800 Storm Drain 48,599 31,601 80,200 Streets 88,957 57,843 146,800 Lighting 21,936 14,264 36,200 Trailway 8,120 5,280 13,400 TOTAL ESTIMATED ASSESSMENTS $446,239 $290,161 $736,400 REVENUE SOURCES The developer, Rosewood Development, will be the primary revenue source for all of the construction costs associated with the Alden Pond Townhomes. The construction cost balance is as shown on the following page. 421C -4- 6,3 ITEM IMPACT ON PROJECT COST REVENUE TRUNK FUNDS A. SANITARY SEWER Lateral Cost $150,000 Lateral Assessment $150,000 -0- B. WATERMAIN Lateral Cost Lateral Assessment C. SERVICES 176,000 133,800 176,000 133,800 - 0- - 0- D. STORM DRAIN Lateral Cost 80,200 Lateral Assessment 80,200 -0- E. STREETS Street Construction Street Assessment 146,800 F. LIGHTING 36,200 G. TRAILWAY 13,400 146,800 36,200 13,400 - 0- - 0- - 0- H. TOTAL PROJECT $736,400 $736,400 -0- 4210 -5- 0 PRLECT SiI.EDjLE PRESE7 FEASIBILITY REPORT PUBLIC :-.EARINO APPROVE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIOn OPEN BID3 AWARD CONTRACT CONSTRUCTION CCrLETION 1. UTILITIES AND FIRST LIFT BIT=OUS 2. OCY.PLETI,n ASSESSENT PEAFO FIRST PAYT tL TH ;LL ESTATE TAXES APPENDIX A PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE ALDEN POND UTILITIES AND STREET IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT NO. 542 A. SANITARY SEWER ITEM TOTAL EST. UNIT QUANTITIES UNITS PRICE TOTAL 3" PVC PIPE 4300 L.F. @ $ 16.00 = $ 63300.00 8" x 4" PVC SEWER WYES 214 EA. @ $ 50.00 = $ 10700.00 CONST STD SAN. SWR MANHOLE 27 EA. @ $ 1000.00 = $ 27000.00 EXCESS MANHOLE DEPTH OVER 0' 20 L.F. @ $ 90.00 = $ 1800.00 ROCK STABILIZATION 200 TON @ $ 11.00 = 2200.00 BREAK IN & CONNECT TO EX. MH 4 EACH @ $ 700.00 = $ 2800.00 SERVICE CONNECTIONS TO EX. TRUNK 4 EACH @ $ 200.00 = $ 300.00 TOTAL $ 114100.00 +5% CONTINGENCY 5700.00 TOTAL SANINTARY SEWER CO:STRUCTION COST +256 ADMINISTRATION $ 119800.00 30200.00 TOTAL SANINTARY SEWER PROJECT COST $ 150000.00 B. WATER MAIN TOTAL UNIT ITEM QUANTITIES UNITS PRICE TOTAL 8" DIP CL 52 WATERMAIN 1550 L.F. @ $ 16.00 = $ 24300.00 6" DIP CL 52 WATERMAIN 4715 L.F. @ $ 15.00 = $ 70725.00 8" GATE VALVE & BOX 8 EA. @ $ 600.00 = $ 4800.00 6" GATE VALVE & BOX 20 EA. @ $ 500.00 = $ 10000.00 HYDRANTS Y9 EA. @ $ 1000.00 = $ 9000.00 HYDRANT EXTENSIONS 10 L.F. e $ 300.00 = $ 3000.00 FITTINGS 6500 LB. @ $ 1.00 = $ 6500.00 8" WET TAP INGL VALVE 2 EA. @ $ 2000.00 = $ 4000.00 ROCK STABILIZATION 100 TON @ $ 11.00 = $ 1100.00 TOTAL $ 133925.00 +5Y. CONTINGENCY 6775.00 TOTAL WATER MAIN CONSTRUCTION COST +257. ADMINISTRATION $ 140700(0.0(0 35300.00 TOTAL WATER MAIN PROJECT COST $ 176000.00 C. SERVICES TOTAL UNIT ITEM QUANTITIES UNITS PRICE TOTAL 4" PVC SAN SEWER SERVICE 1" COPPPER SERVICE PIPE 1" CORPORATION COCKS 1" CURB STOP & BOX ROCK STABILIZATION 4500 L.F. @ $ 10.00 = $ 45000.00 4500 L.F. @ 3 8.00 = $ 06000.00 214 EA. 8 $ 20.00 = $ 4280.00 214 EA. 8 $ 75.00 = $ 16050.00 50 TON 8 $ 11.00 = $ 550.00 TOTAL $ 101880.00 +5Y. CONTINGENCY 5120.00 TOTAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION COST +25% ADMINISTRATION $ 107000.00 26200.00 TOTAL SERVICES PROJECT COST $ 133800.00 D. STORM DRAIN TOTAL UNIT ITEM QUANTITIES UNITS PRICE TOTAL 12" R.C.P. C.B. LEADS 12" R.C.P. 15" R.C.P. C. B. LEADS 15" R.C.P. 18" R.C.P. 18" RCP F.E.S. WITH TRASH GUARD 36" R.C.F. 36" RCP F.E.S. WITH TRASH GUARD STANDARD 4' DIA. STM. MH (0 - 8') EXCESS 4' DIA. MH DEPTH ` 8' CATCH BASIN TYPE A CATCH BASIN TYPE B CATCH BASIN MANHOLE REMOVE PIPE ALL SIZES ROCK STABILIZATION 350 L.F. 8 3 16.00 = $ 5600.00 220 L.F. 8 $ 15.00 = $ 3300.00 150 L.F. 8 $ 17.00 = $ 2550.00 250 L.F. 8 $ 16.00 = $ 4000.00 1240 L.F. 8 $ 18.00 = $ 22323.00 2 EA. $ 200.00 = $ 400.00 85 L.F. 8 $ 45.00 = $ 3825.00 1 EA. 8 $ 800.00 = $ 800.00 3 EA. 8 $ 800.00 = $ 2400.00 15 L.F. 8 $ 60.00 = $ 900.00 6 EA. 8 $ 700.00 = $ 4200.00 2 EA. 8 $ 700.00 = $ 1400.00 8 EA. 8 $ 800.00 = $ 6400.00 85 L.F. 8 $ 10.00 = $ 850.00 200 TON 8 $ 11.00 = $ 2200.00 TOTAL $ 61145.00 +57.. CONTINGENCY 3055.00 ------------ TOTAL STORM DRAIN CONSTRUCTION COST $ 64200.00 +257.. ADMINISTRATION 16000.00 TOTAL STORM DRAIN PROJECT COST $ 80200.01 E. STREETS TOTAL UNIT ITEM QUANTITIES UNITS PRICE TOTAL SUBGRADE CORRECTION 1000 C.Y. @ $ 2.00 = $ 2000.00 SUBGRADE PREP 18 R.S. 0 $ 100.00 = 3 1800.00 AGGREGATE BASE CL 5 (100%. CRUSHED) 4500 TON @ $ 7.00 = $ 31500.00 2331 BITUMINOUS BASE COURSE 715 TON @ $ 11.00 = 3 7365.00 2341 BITUMINOUS BINDER COURSE 715 TON @ $ 12.00 = $ 8530.00 2341 BITUMINOUS WEAR COURSE 360 TON @ 3 12.00 = $ 4320.00 BITUMINOUS MATERIAL FOR MIXTURE 100 TON @ $ 160.00 = $ 16000.00 BITUMINOUS MATERIAL FOR TACK COAT 310 GAL. @ $ 1.20 = 3 372.00 CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER B 613 3500 L.F. @ $ 4.50 = $ 1575).00 8" CONCRETE DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT 400 S.Y. @ $ 30.00 = 3 12000.00 SODDING 5200 S.Y. @ $ 2.00 = $ 10400.00 F & I ST. SIGNS (COMPLETE ASSEMBLY) 2 EA. @ $ 200. 00 = $ 400.00 FURNISH & INSTALL TRAFFIC SIGNS 4 EA. @ $ 150.00 = $ 600.00 TRAFFIC MARKING PAINT 5.0 GAL. @ $ 50.00 = $ 250.00 TOTAL $ 111837.00 +5% CONTINGENCY 5563.00 TOTAL STREET CONSTRUCTION COST +257% ADMINISTRATION $ 117400.00 294 X0.00 TOTAL STREET PROJECT COST $ 146300.00 F. LIGHTING TOTAL UNIT ITEM QUANTITIES UNITS PRICE TOTAL STREET LIGHTS INTERIOR LIGHTS 9 EA. @ $ 1000.00 = $ 9000.00 21 EA. @ $ 1000.00 = $ 21000.00 TOTAL $ 30000.00 +57. CONTINGENCY 1500.00 TOTAL LIGHTING CONSTRUCTION COST +15% ADMINISTRATION $ 31500.00 4700.00 TOTAL LIGHTING PROJECT COST $ 36200.00 ITER TOTAL UNIT QUANTITIES UNITS PRICE TOTAL AGGREGATE BASE CL 5 (100% CRUSHED) 550 TON @ $ 2341 BITUMINOUS WEAR COURSE 290 TON 0 $ BITUMINOUS MATERIAL FOR MIXTURE 19 TON @ 7.00 = $ 12.00 = $ 160.00 = $ 3350.00 3480.00 3040.00 TOTAL $ 10370.00 +5: CONTINGENCY 330.00 TOTAL TRAILWAY CONSTRUCTION COST +25% ADMINISTRATION 10700.00 2700.00 TOTAL TRAILWAY PROJECT COST $ 13400.00 TOTAL PROJECT COST A. SANITARY SEWER B. WATER MAIN C. SERVICES D. STORM DRAIN E. STREETS F. LIGHTING G. TRAILWAY TOTAL PROJECT $ 150000.00 $ 176000.00 $ 133800.00 $ 80200.00 $ 146800.00 $ 36200.00 $ 13400.00 ------------ $ 736400.00 APPENDIX B PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL ALDEN POND UTILITIESS AND STREET IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT 542 A. SANITARY SEWER PARCEL TOTAL ASSESSABLE ASSESSMENT CONST AREA (SF) RATE / SF ASSMNT ALDEN POND BLOCK 1, LOT 1 148066 $0.614 390,896 BLOCK 2, LOT 1 96278 $0.614 $59,104 B. WATER MAIN LATERAL PARCEL 244344 $150,000 TOTAL ASSESSABLE ASSESSMENT CONST AREA (SF) RATE / SF ASSMNT ALDEN POND DLCCK 1, LOT 1 148066 30.720 $106,651 BLOCK 2, LOT 1 96278 $0.720 $69,349 C. SERVICES 244344 $176,000 TOTAL ASSESSABLE ASSESSMENT GO NST PARCEL AREA (SF) RATE / SF ASSMNT ALDEN POND BLOCK 1, LOT 1 148066 30.548 $81,079 BLOCK 2, LOT 1 96278 30.548 352,721 D. STORM DRAIN 244344 $133,300 TOTAL ASSESSABLE ASSESSMENT CONST PARCEL AREA (SF) RATE / SF ASSMNT ALDEN POND KOCK 1, LOT 1 148066 $0.323 348,599 BLOCK 2, LOT 1 96273 $0.328 331,601 244344 $0,200 PARCEL TOTAL ASSESSABLE ASSESSMENT CONST AREA (SF) RATE / SF ASSMNT ALDEN POND BLOCK 1, LOT 1 148066 $0.601 $88,957 BLOCK 2, LOT 1 96270 $0.601 $57,843 F. LIGHTING PARCEL 244344 $146,800 TOTAL ASSESSABLE ASSESSMENT CONST AREA (SF) RATE / SF ASSMNT ALDEN POND BLOCK 1, LOT 1 148066 $0.148 $21,.936 BLOCK 2, LOT 1 96278 $0.143 $14,264 G. TRAILWAY PARCEL 244344 $36,200 TOTAL ASSESSABLE ASSESSMENT CONST AREA (SF) RATE / SF ASSMNT ALDEN POND BLOCK 1, LOT 1 148066 $0.055 $8,120 BLOCK 2, LOT 1 96278 $0.055 $5,280 244344 $13,400 FOUR OAKS ROAD 3 33 0 --<--1J T ASSESSMENT AREA ... 1" = 250' Drown By: Date: 8-2-88 Orr Schelen Mayeron & Associates. Inc. Engineers • Surveyors • Planners t011 Le. H•simpla A • 1118•44p4114. MN 66413 • 613-331- 6660 Drawing Title ALDEN POND TOWNHOMES SANITARY SEWER CITY PROJECT NO. 542 EAGAN, MINNESOTA Comm. No. 4210 Sheet no. 1 LAMM • - FOUR OAKS ROAD 7 ASSESSMENT AREA 4 1 '0 • V_ 1. 3 / • 1" = 250' Drown By: Date: 8-2-88 Orr Schelen Mayeron & Associates. Inc. Engineers • Sur•eyors • Planners toSi Last Nessepla Avopue • litanospolls. W$ 66413 • 616-331-6660 Drawing Title ALDEN POND TOWNHOMES WATER MAIN CITY PROJECT NO. 542 EAGAN, MINNESOTA Comm. No. 4210 Sheet no. 2 73 FOUR OAKS ROAD ASSESSMENT AREA 0 0 x 2 0 • 1"=250' Drawn By: Date: 8-2-88 Orr Mayeron & Associates. Inc: • Znalneers • Surveyors • Planners LAt1 Last M.a•.pIa • • tlt••..p.lt.. 1111 5641a • •1L-aat-0660 Drawing Title ALDEN POND TOWNHOMES STORM SEWER CITY PROJECT NO. 542 EAGAN, MINNESOTA Comm. No. 4210 Sheet no. 3 FOUR OAKS ROAD_ - ASSESSMENT AREA i< 0 oci z n • 32' F -F STREET WIDTH 60' RIGHT OF WAY 1"=250' Drown By: Date: 8-2-88 Orr Schelen Mayeron & Associates. Inc. Injlneers • Surveyors • Planners eon Let M.aa.pol■ • 11taa..r.11a. NH 66417 • e1t-771-eee0 Drawing Title ALDEN POND TOWNHOMES STREET CITY PROJECT NO. 542 EAGAN, MINNESOTA - i Comm. No. 4210 Sheet no. 4 • STREET LIGHT FOUR OAKS ROAD __ _ T ASSESSMENT AREA 1"=250' Drawn By: Date: 8-2-88 Orr Schelen Itayeron & Associates. Inc. Lnglneers • Surveyors • Planners t0Z1 Zest H.ss.)1■ • litae.4plls. MX 66411 • 611-131-6066 Drawing T+tle ALDEN POND TOWNHOMES LIGHTING CITY PROJECT NO. 542 EAGAN, MINNESOTA Comm. No. 4210 Sheet no. 5 8' WIDE BITUMINOUS TRAILWAY FOUR OAKS ROAD ASSESSMENT AREA 0 >4 0 0 1' • 1 1": 250' Drawn By: Date: 8-2-88 Orr Schelen Mayeron & Associates. Inc. Engineers • Surveyors • PI Mtn Lal Mossopla • 111051.opelle. MN 56413 • 81t-331-0660 Drawing Title ALDEN POND TOWNHOMES TRAILWAY CITY PROJECT NO. 542 EAGAN, MINNESOTA Comm. No. 4210 Sheet no. 6 -7-7 Agenda Information Memo September 6, 1988, City Council Meeting FINAL ASSMT HEARINGS/MISC PROJECTS 12 projects have had their final assessment rolls prepared with the public hearing scheduled for September 6. Of those 12, 11 should have their public hearings held to receive input from affected property owners regarding the proposed final costs resulting from the installation of these public improvements. Project 499 should be continued to September 19 due to errors that were discovered requiring a revision to the final assessment roll requiring new notifications. Of the remaining 11 projects, 284 parcels were assessed a total of $3,090,225.92 with City Trunk Funds financing $383,365.55. All assessments were levied in accordance with City policies and/or the methods defined in the feasibility report presented at the project's respective public hearing. All notices of this public final assessment hearing were sent to all affected property owners informing them of their proposed final assessment obligations. In addition, all notices were published in the legal newspaper as required by State Statute. The Public Works Director will provide a brief introduction with specific generic statements for each project and will be available to answer questions wring this public hearing. Enclosed on pages 7? through is a summary of the final assessment rates for the various types of improvements per project as compared to those quoted in the feasibility report presented at the respective public hearing. Each project's public hearing should be individually addressed with specific action taken on each item. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To close the public hearing and approve the final assessment roll for Project #503, Windtree 8th Addition - Streets & Utilities, except any appropriate parcels, and authorize the certification to the County for collection. The above action is also necessary for each of the following projects: Project Project Project Project Project Project Project Project Project Project Project 493, (Greensboro 2nd Addition - Streets 502, (R & B Addition - Storm Sewer) 479, (Lexington/Northview Park - Trunk Storm Sewer) 504, (Whispering Woods 2nd Addition - Streets & Utilities) 460B, (North Nicols Road - Streets) 486, (EZ Air Park - Storm Sewer) 461, (Yankee Doodle Rd. - I35E to Lexington Ave. - Streets) 478, (Lexington Hill - Sanitary Sewer) 492, (Lone Oak 2nd Addition/O'Neil Drive - Water & Sanitary) 505, (Country Hollow Addition - Trunk Storm & Sanitary) 499, (Chapel Hill Baptist Church - Streets) To Be Continued To September 19, 1988, City Council Meeting. & Utilities) FINAL ASSESSMENT- HEARING - / 9 - d 2 PROJECT NO: 503 SUBDIVISION/AREA: WTNDTREF. 8TH ADDITION FINAL ASSESSMENT HEARING: SEPTEMBER 6, 1988 IMPROVEMENTS INSTALLED AND/OR ASSESSED: F.R. = Feasibility Report FINAL F.R. WATER RATES RATES Area E Laterals $1,114.65/lot $1,3 16/1ot LJX Service $ 639.52/lot $ 987/1ot Q1_at. Benefit/ Trunk FINAL F.R. SANITARY RATES RATES Area a Laterals $1,152.85/lot $1,531/lot EService Lac. Benefit/ Trunk STORM . C{j . rea Lateral STREETS 842.07/lpt $ 905/10= 0 $2,631.28/lot $3,320/10 NUMBER OF PARCELS AFFECTED: NUMBER OF YEARS ASSESSED: RATE OF INTEREST: 35 Cravel Base Surfacing 0 Res. Equiv. $3,431.96/lot(12,977/lot 5 9.0% TOTAL AMOUNT ASSESSED: $343.431.55 (F.R. = $386.259) TOTAL AMOUNT CITY FINANCED: —0— CONSTRUCTED. UNDER THE FOLLOWING CONTRACTS: 87-19 PUBLIC HEARING DATE: JUNE 16, 1987 (1) The significant overrun was caused by extra cost incurred because Developer failed to establish vegetative cover for erosion control as required by the Development Contract. 1 �9 PROJECT NO: 491 FINAL ASSESSMENT HEARING SUBDIVISION/AREA: GREENSBORO 2ND ADDITION FINAL ASSESSMENT HEARING: SEPTEMBER 6, 1988 IMPROVEMENTS INSTALLED AND/OR ASSESSED: F.R. = Feasibility Report WATER ElArea Xi Laterals FINAL F.R. RATES RATES $1,366/lot $1.156.27/lot XQ Service $761.63/lot $909/lot Water & Sanitary QLac. Benefit/ Trunk I' w:.--. wi FINAL F.R. SANITARY RATES RATCS DArea XE Laterals $1,778.33/lot $1,783/1ot 0 Service 0 Lat. Benefit/ Trunk STORM . Area 0 Lateral $ 709.82/1ot $1.061i1or $1,520.63/lot $1,410/lot NUMBER OF PARCELS AFFECTED: 42 STREETS QGravel Base ® Surfacing 0 Res. Equiv. • $3.155.99/lor $3.548/1or NUMBER OF YEARS ASSESSED: 5 RATE OF INTEREST: 9.0% TOTAL AMOUNT ASSESSED: $381,472.14 (F.R. _ $423,234) TOTAL AMOUNT CITY FINANCED: $91.84 CONSTRUCTED UNDER THE FOLLOWING CONTRACTS: 87-11 PUBLIC HEARING DATE: March 17, 1987 1 FINAL ASSESSMENT }TEARING PROJECT NO: 502 SUBDIVISION/AREA: R & B ADDITION • FINAL ASSESSMENT HEARING: SEPTEMBER 6, 1988 IMPROVEMENTS INSTALLED AND/OR ASSESSED: F.R. _: Feasibility Report FINAL F.R. WATER RATES RATES Area QLaterals ['Service QLac. Benefit/ Trunk FINAL F.R. SANITARY RATES RATES 0 Area QLaterals Service 0 Lac. Benefit/ Trunk STORM. a Area $0.079/sf $0.079/sf Lateral Benefit2Qi i 144aa p2R4i/1,- Area Basis LSO Lateral Benefit Lin Ft. Basis $36.189 $37.38/Lin. /Lin. Ft Ft. NUMBER OF PARCELS AFFECTED: 8 STREETS Gravel Base Surfacing ORes. Equiv. • NUMBER OF YEARS ASSESSED: 15 RATE OF INTEREST: 9.0% TOTAL AMOUNT ASSESSED: $129,594.11 (F.R. = $145,690) TOTAL AMOUNT CITY FINANCED: $ 5,591.62 CONSTRUCTED UNDER THE FOLLOWING CONTRACTS: 87-36 PUBLIC NEARING DATE: AUGUST 4, 1987 FINAL ASSESSMENT HEARING PROJECT NO: 479 SUBDIVISION/AREA: LEXINGTON AVENUE/NORTHVIEW PARK FINAL ASSESSMENT HEARING: SEPTEMBER 6, 1988 IMPROVEMENTS INSTALLED AND/OR ASSESSED: F.R. = Feasibility Report FINAL F.R. WATER RATES RATES EjArea QLaterals Service Lac. Benefit/ Trunk - 19- 98 FINAL F.R. SANITARY RATES RATES 0 Area OLaterals 0 Service ElLac. Benefit/ Trunk STORM . Area $0.05/sf SQ.09/sf ® Lateral $41,095.31 $29,810.00 Benefit lump sum ump sum NUMBER OF PARCELS AFFECTED: 71 STREETS 0 Gravel Base Surfacing ORes. Equiv. NUMBER OF YEARS ASSESSED: 15 RATE OF INTEREST: 9% TOTAL AMOUNT ASSESSED: $310,599.22 (F.R. $306,885) TOTAL AMOUNT CITY FINANCED: $102,348.44 CONSTRUCTED UNDER THE FOLLOWING CONTRACTS: 87-05 PUBLIC HEARING DATE: DECEMBER 16, 1986 1 8 PROJECT NO: 504 FINAL ASSESSMEN_'1'' HEARING SUBDIVISION/AREA: WHISPERING WOODS 2ND ADDITION • FINAL ASSESSMENT HEARING: SEPTEMBER 6, 1988 IMPROVEMENTS INSTALLED AND/OR ASSESSED: F.R. = Feasibility Report FINAL F.R. WATER RATES RATES Area QLaterals QService QLac. Benefit/ Trunk 4',,Q 0.22,ge, FINAL F.R. SANITARY RATES RATES 0Area EILaterals EDService 0 Lac. Benefit/ Trunk STORM . DA.:ea Lateral $ 4953.581 /ac(1) $ 3968.766 /ac $3148/ac NUMBER. OF PARCELS AFFECTED: NUMBER OF YEARS ASSESSED: RATE OF INTEREST: 18 STREETS QGravel Base EiSurfacing 0 Res. Equiv. • 15 97, TOTAL AMOUNT ASSESSED: $89,971.79 (F.R. = 167,170' TOTAL .AMOUNT CITY FINANCED: —0— CONSTRUCTED UNDER THE FOLLOWING CONTRACTS: PUBLIC HEARING DATE: August 4, 1987 87-36 (1) The rate for Whispering Woods only. The cost difference is for catch basin leads and 2 catch basins and 2 — 4' manholes to service Whispering Woods 2nd Addition, and its pro rata share of items 2, 3 and 4 as listed above. FINAL ASSESSMENT HEARING PROJECT NO: 460B SUBDIVISION/AREA: NICOLS ROAD FINAL ASSESSMENT HEARING: SEPTEMBER 5, 1988 IMPROVEMENTS INSTALLED AND/OR ASSESSED: F.R. = Feasibility Report FINAL F.R. WATER RATES RATES ElArea ['Laterals $2,071.88/ser $853/ser Q Service $3.903.90/ser ?5 llQfs QLat. Benefit/ Trunk FINAL F.R. SANITARY RATES RATES Area ELaterals r Service Lat. Benefit/ Trunk STORM . Area ElLateral NUMBER OF PARCELS AFFECTED: NUMBER OF YEARS ASSESSED: RATE OF INTEREST: 17 STREETS [:]Gravel Base Surfacing ['Res. Equiv. X Trailway, SF=$16.88/ff. .C1=$78.45/ff $16.88/ff $78.45/ff $11.81/ff $11.81/ff 10 8. 5% TOTAL AMOUNT ASSESSED: 202 ,617_51 (F R, — r Rs,?5V TOTAL AMOUNT CITY FINANCED: $271,271.02 CONSTRUCTED UNDER THE FOLLOWING CONTRACTS: PUBLIC HEARING DATE: February 18, 1986 87-16 (f FINAL ASSESSMENT HEARING PROJECT NO: 486 SUBDIVISION/AREA: E—Z AIR PARK FINAL ASSESSMENT HEARINC: SEPTEMBER 6, 1988 IMPROVEMENTS INSTALLED AND/OR ASSESSED: F.R. = Feasibility Report FINAL F.R. WATER RATES RATES • Area CILaterals QService EILac. Benefit/ Trunk es - H - 88 FINAL F.R. SANITARY RATES RATES 0Area ELacera15 0 Service 0 Lat. Benefit/ Trunk STORK Area Lateral $ 9,504.95/1f$11,945 L.S. $30_203-03/1f$33.420 L.S. NUMBER OF PARCELS AFFECTED: NUMBER OF YEARS ASSESSED: RATE OF INTEREST: 3 STREETS OCravel Base Surfacing ElRes. Equiv. 10 9.0% TOTAL AMOUNT ASSESSED: $49,212.93 (F.R. _ $57,310) TOTAL AMOUNT CITY FINANCED: $106,411.07 (F.R. = $141,730) CONSTRUCTED UNDER THE FOLLOWINC CONTRACTS: 87-20 PUBLIC HEARING DATE: MARCH 17, 1987 • FINAL ASSESSMENT HEARING PROJECT NO: 461 SUBDIVISION/AREA: YANKEE DOODLE ROAD FINAL ASSESSMENT HEARING: SEPTEMBER 6, 1938 11, IMPROVEMENTS INSTALLED AND/OR ASSESSED: F.R. = Feasibility Report WATER 0 Area FINAL RATES F.R. RATES ['Laterals �X Service $47,314.63 $43,160 lu Water & Sanitary 0 Lat. Benefit/ Trunk STORM. ElArea Lateral 9.20 SF $7.19/ff SF 17.27 MF13.50/ff MF 21.38 r� $16.72/ff C/ NUMBER OF PARCELS AFFECTED: NUMBER OF YEARS ASSESSED: RATE OF INTEREST: 15 SANITARY Area 0 Laterals p Service 0 Lat. Benefit/ Trunk STREETS OGravel Base Surfacing EX Res. Equiv. • ❑X Trail - 3c -EE FINAL RATES $33.75/ff SF $63.36/ff MF • $78.C5/ff C/I $11.81/ff F.R. RAT E S $33.75/ff SF $63.36/ff MF $78_',5/ff C/I $11.81/ff 10 9.0% TOTAL AMOUNT ASSESSED: $584,378.22 (F.R. = $551,212.55) TOTAL AMOUNT CITY FINANCED: $169,308.60 CONSTRUCTED UNDER THE FOLLOWING CONTRACTS: County 28-10 PUBLIC HEARING DATE: February 4, 1986 cAp l FINAL ASSESSMENT BEARING PROJECT NO: 478 SUBDI ?VISION / AREA : LEXINGTON HILLS FINAL ASSESSMENT HEARING: SEPTEMBER 6. 1988 IMPROVEMENTS INSTALLED AND/OR ASSESSED: F.R. = Feasibility Report FINAL F.R. WATER RATES RATES Area ['Laterals ['Service QLat. Benefit/ Trunk SANITARY Area 0 Laterals Service ['Lat. Benefit/ Trunk FINAL RATES $1,240/ac. 595/lot F.R. RATES $1, 261/ac (1) 595/lot j-15_75/ff (2) S'17 75/ff STORM . CIArea 0 Lac era I NUMBER OF PARCELS AFFECTED: 17 NUMBER OF YEARS ASSESSED: RATE OF INTEREST: STREETS QCravel Base Surfacing QRes. Equiv. ' 10 9° 0 TOTAL AMOUNT ASSESSED: $151,047.58 TOTAL AMOUNT CITY FINANCED: 0 (FR=S140.7fi7) CONSTRUCTED UNDER THE FOLLOWING CONTRACTS: 87-05 PUBLIC HEARING DATE: NOVEMBER 18, 1986 (1) Error in the Feasibility Report. The 1986 rate was $1,240.00 (2) The cost overrun was due to the lowering of the sanitary sewer pipe to accommodate existing and future homes along Lexington Way PROJECT NO: 492 FINAL ASSESSMENT HEARING SUBDIVISION/AREA: LONE OAK 2ND ADDITION FINAL ASSESSMENT HEARING: SEPTEMBER 6, 1988 IMPROVEMENTS INSTALLED AND/OR ASSESSED: F.R. = Feas:btlicy Report WATER Area L:,cerals FINAL F.R. RATES RATES $1250/ac,$600/lot $1250/ac,$600, © Service $1021.17/service $677/service SF=$12.47/ff $12.47/ff L.. . Benefit/ CI-$20.55/ff $70.55/ff Trunk X WATER AVAILABILITY $1920/ac -0- 1d FINAL F.R. SANITARY RATES RATES lot Area Xl Laterals f 31.83/ff $ ?7.44/ff Service EiLac. Benefit) Trunk STORM . ClAria �{ Lateral $11.1?/ff $33.06/ff NUMBER OF PARCELS AFFECTED: NUMBER OF YEARS ASSESSED: RATE OF INTEREST: TOTAL AMOUNT ASSESSED: 19 STREETS QCravel Base ESurfacing SF=$35.44/ff . $35.44/ff FX Ras. Equiv. CI=$82.37/ff $87.37/ff 10 9.07 $716,594.38 (F.R.=$766,772.?0) TOTAL AMOUNT CITY FINANCED: _0_ CONSTRUCTED UNDER THE FOLLOWING CONTRACTS: 87-07 PUBLIC REARING DATE: February 1, 1987 1 FINAL ASSESSMENT HEARING PRO.ECT NO: 505 SUBCIVISION/AREA: COUNTRY HOLLOW TRUNK UTILITIES FINAL ASSESSMENT HEARING: SEPTEMBER 6, 1988 IMPROVEMENTS INSTALLED AND/OR ASSESSED: F.R. = Feasibility Report WATER LIArea ['Laterals FINAL F.R. RATES RATES $1,_250/ac $1,250/ac EX Service 278.38/lnt 645/10t ® Lac. Benefit/ 17.47/ff 12_47/ff Trunk FINAL F.R. SANITARY RATES RATES ®Area $1 100/ar , 1 ,?Oil/ar OLaterals 0 Service ©Lac. Benefit/ 15.06/ff 15.06/ff Trunk STOR f . EX Area 0.053/sf $0.053/sf Lateral 330,21/lnr(1)965.15/1nr Benefit/trunk NUMBER OF PARCELS AFFECTED: NUMBER OF YEARS ASSESSED: RATE OF INTEREST: 110 STREETS QCravel Base Surfacing 0 Res. Equiv. ' 15 9.0% TOTAL AMOUNT ASSESSED: $436,088.58(2(F.R. = $402.436) TOTAL AMOUNT CITY FINANCED: —0— CONSTRUCTED UNDER THE FOLLOWING CONTRACTS: 87-30 PUBLIC HEARING DATE: July 21, 1987 (1) Increase costs were due to higher 15" R.C.P. construction costs and additional lin. ft. of pipe constructed. (2) Increase in total amount assessed was due to Change Order No. 1 for additional trunk sanitary sewer to serve the property to the east and easement costs which was not addressed irf the Feasibility Report. 1 39 Agenda Information Memo September 6, 1988, City Council Meeting OLD- BUSINESS COMPREHENSIVE GUIDE PLAN AMENDMENT AND REZONING LEXINGTON LAND COMPANY A. Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment and Rezoning of R-3, Planned Development District for Lexington Land Company --This item first appeared on the June 7 City Council agenda and after deliberation there were two (2) motions approved. The first motion reads as follows: "Egan moved, Ellison seconded, the motion to continue the Comprehensive Guide Plan amendment and rezoning for the Lexington Land Company to allow a planned development located south of the Bulk Mail Facility to Lexington Avenue to the first meeting agenda in August. Gustafson, Ellison, Egan and McCrea voted in favor; Wachter voted against." The second motion read as follows: "Ellison moved, McCrea seconded, the motion to approve an unbinding resolution by the Council stating that the Lexington Land Company property will be developed as a use other than residential. This land will probably be some type of industrial. All voted affirmatively." A meeting was held during the month of July, however, there was no formal action given to the freeway zoning procedure and, therefore, at the August 2 meeting, this item was continued until the September 6 Council meeting. Unfortunately, with the August work load there has not been time to finalize the freeway zoning procedure and schedule a special work session of the City Council and Planning Commission for a final review. The City Planner has discussed this matter with representatives of Lexington Land Company and they are agreeable to an indefinite continuance allowing the City adequate time this fall to finalize the freeway zoning procedure and then schedule Lexington Land Company applications for Council review. There are no attachments or information supplied with this item given the request for continuance. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To continue the Comprehensive Guide Plan amendment for Lexington Land Company and rezoning of 57 R-3 acres to a planned development district indefinitely to allow the City to finalize its freeway zoning procedure. Agenda Information Memo September 6, 1988, City Council Meeting REZONING AND PRELIMINARY PLAT/GALAXIE CLIFF PLAZA B. Rezoning, Galaxie Cliff Plaza for Ten Acres to a Limited Business Planned Development District Consisting of One Lot and Three Outlots for Future Development and a Preliminary Plat Containing 25.36 Acres Entitled Galaxie Cliff Plaza --A public hearing was held by the APC at their regular meeting held on July 26 to consider a Comprehensive Guide Plan amendment, rezoning and a preliminary plat entitled Galaxie Cliff Addition as requested by the Cliff Plaza Partnership. The City Council reviewed the applications, allowed public testimony and spent approximately three (3) hours reviewing the proposal for the Galaxie Cliff Plaza project at the August 2 City Council meeting. At the conclusion of the discussion the following motion was introduced and approved unanimously: "Egan moved, Ellison seconded, the motion to continue the Comprehensive Guide Plan amendment and rezoning from agricultural to a planned development district for the Galaxie Cliff Plaza, based on the consent by the developer for a 120 day continuation. Requirements: assuming that there will be zoning of limited business west and north of the proposed circulation drive and no zoning higher than limited business south and east of the circulation drive." It was also the conclusion of the City Council that the item be sent back to the Advisory Planning Commission realizing their action of July 26 did not include the City Attorney's legal opinion regarding the land owners rights to the Comprehensive Guide Plan designation of limited business. The APC reconsidered the Galaxie Cliff Plaza applications at their August 23 meeting and are recommending approval of the rezoning and preliminary plat applications as presented. The motion reads as follows: "Voracek moved, Graves seconded, the motion to close the public hearing and to approve separate applications for rezoning of ten (+ or -) agricultural acres to a LB planned development district consisting of one lot and three outlots for future development and a preliminary plat containing 25.36 acres located south of Cliff Road, west of Galaxie Avenue inthe northwest quarter of Section 32 subject to the following conditions:" For a copy of a revised report from the Planning and Engineering Department, refer to pages a a through V9. For a copy of the APC action of Ayjgust 23, refer to those minutes found on pages 1\.0 through R ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny 1) the rezoning of ten acres of A to LB planned development district and 2) a preliminary plat entitled Galaxie Cliff Plaza as presented. ql CITY OF EAGAN SUBJECT: REZONING, PRELIMINARY PLAT GALAXIE CLIFF PLAZA ADDITION APPLICANT: TRI -LAND COMPANIES/WILLIAM SOULES LOCATION: NW 1/4 OF SECTION 32 EXISTING ZONING: AG (AGRICULTURAL) DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: AUGUST 23, 1988 DATE OF REPORT: AUGUST 17, 1988 REPORTED BY: PLANNING AND ENGINEERING DEPARTMENTS APPLICATION SUMMARY Separate applications have been submitted to the City requesting a rezoning of 5.7 Ag (agricultural) acres to a planned development district for limited business use only, and a preliminary plat of 25.36 acres consisting of one 2.7 -acre lot for an office building and two outlots containing 3.0 acres for future development with LB zoning. The remaining 19.7 acres remain agriculturally zoned and are being platted as outlots so the legal descriptions and overall road layout can be resolved. No development can occur on any of the outlots without going through the public hearing process. The previous proposal and development partnership was directed by the City Council to revise the overall plan to include limited business use only. Since then, that partnership has been dissolved. Tri -Land properties will still develop the area on the west side of Circulation Drive and Mr. William Soules will retain rights to the agricultural -zoned land between Galaxie Avenue and Circulation Drive. This proposal includes both names for platting requirements only. The approximately 3 -acre, RB -zoned piece in the southwest corner is not included with either the rezoning or the preliminary plat request. SITE PLAN The overall circulation system remains the same as the previous proposal. The street will be constructed from Galaxie Avenue to the south end of the office building lot with the initial phase. That road will be extended as development occurs and will ultimately have to provide access to the RB piece. Tri -Land Companies has agreed to the PD concept (zoning) for the office lot and two outlots so an overall aesthetic compatibility may be achieved. This includes architectural items, landscaping, lighting, and maximum site design flexibility in order to save trees. P.n example is the proposed shared parking area with the office and outlot to the north. GALAXIE CLIFF PLAZA ADDITION The 21,818 -square -foot building has -a lot coverage of 9%; limited business districts allow 20%. Code requires 116 parking stalls and 171 have been provided for poten=tial cross parking. Only the amount• necessary for the office building should be constructed until the adjacent users are determined. Only 18' -length stalls are required where curbing is provided. The two-story office building for Merrill Lynch remains the same as with the previous submittal. It will be constructed of decorative precast panels and anodized aluminum windows. The landscape plan saves a large stand of trees along Circulation Drive on lot 1. The proposed new -plantings are compatible with the existing native material and will add to the "reforestation" effect as opposed to the typical urban treescape. A retaining wall on the north side of the entrance from Galaxie Aveneue will preserve a stand of existing trees.: �3 GRADING/DRAINAGE/EROSION CONTROL: The preliminary grading plan proposes site grading only in the northeast corner of the site. The grading plan proposes cut and fill areas ranging from 9'-6', respectively. The development is proposing to construct retaining walls in two areas along the north side of Circulation Drive. The proposed retaining wall construction is an attempt to protect the existing vegetation. Approximately the north one-half of Lot 1, Block 1, and Outlot B are proposed to drain into the I -35E right-of-way. The proposed grading and drainage plan does not provide information on how the site graded runoff is to be conveyed to the 1-35E right-of-way. Drainage into the I -35E right-of-way is subject to review and approval by MnDOT. The south half of Lot 1, Block 1, the south half of Outlot 3, and Circulation Drive are proposed to drain to Pond AP -14. Pond AP - 14 is a designated ponding area in the City of Eagan's Comprehensive Storm Water Management Plan. A new ponding area is proposed west of the intersection of Naris Way and Galaxie Avenue. The City's storm water plan requires that these two ponding areas :rust provide at least 10.9 acre feet of combined storage. An outlet has been provided for Pond AP -14 under the Galaxie Avenue improvement project. The outlet for the pond west of the intersection of Karis Way and Galaxie Avenue is required into Pond AP -14. The alignment of the proposed outlet shall be located to minimize the disturbance to the existing vegetation. No preliminary erosion and sediment control plan was submitted for staff review and approval. UTILITIES: Adequately sized sanitary sewer and water service to serve the proposed development are readily available from the existing utilities in Galaxie Avenue. The preliminary plan proposes to serve Lot 1, Block 1, Outlot A and Outlot B, with a sanitary sewer line that would connect to the existing 8" sanitary sewer proposed along Galaxie Avenue. The proposed sanitary sewer connection will require open cutting of Galaxie Avenue. An 8" water main connection is provided to the property line along Galaxie Avenue at two locations to allow the water main to be looped through the proposed site without disturbing the existing surfacing of Galaxie Avenue. The preliminary utility plan proposes to connect to the existing 8" water main stub on Galaxie Avenue, north of Karis Way. The development is required to extend the proposed 8" water main on Circulation Drive to its westerly terminus. Water pressure in this development for all but the highest sites will be greater than 80 psi. Pressure reducing valves will be required for water systems in those buildings having a floor elevation lower than 865. Sanitary sewer and water main services are to be provided along Circulation Drive in locations conducive to future site -development. a4 STrtEETS/ACCESS/CIRCULATION: The development is proposing to serve his site with a public street access through the use of a temporary 700'+/- long cul-de-sac from Galaxie Avenue. The proposed location of the Galaxie Avenue intersection is an acceptable location at approximately 420'+/- south of the center line of Cliff Road. The development will be required to construct a temporary cul-de- sac at the westerly terminus of Circulation Drive. EASEMENT/RIGHTS-OF-WAY/PERMITS: easements in accordance with City of _]agan standards will be required for ail storm sewer, sanitary sewer and water mains. Drainage and utility easements will be required to the high water level for Pond AP -14 and the proposed pond west of the intersection of Karis Way and Galaxie Avenue. High water elevations and storage volume requirements will be in accordance with the City of Eagan's Comprehensive Storm Sewer Plan. Circulation Drive will be required to be a 70' wide right-of-way. The development will be required to provide a temporary easement for the required temporary cul-de-sac at the westerly terminus of Circulation Drive. The Dakota County Plat Commission has reviewed the preliminary pia.t for Galaxie Cliff Plaza. The County will not be requiring any additional right-of-way for Cliff Road but will be requiring the dedication of restricted access along the entire frontage of Cliff Road. All regulatory agency hermits shall be acquired within the appropriate time frame as required by the affected agency. ASSESSMENTS: City records show no pending assessments of record, and. the following assessments are proposed as a condition of final plat approval in accordance with special assessment policies in effect at this time: PROJ * DESCRIPTION RATE QTY AMT Water Availability Charge $2,015/ac 2.75 $5,541 316 Storm Sewer Trunk Upgrade .027/sf 119,600 3,229 TOTAL PROPOSED ASSESSMENT $8,770 All final assessment obligations will be calculated based on the quantities and dimensions of the final plat and in accordance with the rates in effect at the time of the final plat approval. • 411 GALAXIE CLIFF PLAZA CONDITIONS 1. These standard conditions of plat approval as adopted by Council action on September 15, 1987 shall be complied with: Al, B1, B2, B3, B4, Cl, C2, C3, C4, C5, D1, El, Fl, and Gl. 2. A Planned Development Agreement shall be entered into for a five-year Period. 3. A 50' no -building or parking buffer area shall be placed along the Galaxie Avenue property line. 4. The trash shall be contained within the office building on lot 1, block 1. 5. All signage shall be subject to the one-time sign fee of $2.50 par square foot and other sign ordinance requirements. 6. All outlots shall be reviewed by the Advisory Planning Commission and the City Council before any construction or grading occurs. 7 The shared parking concept, parking up to the north line on lot 1, block 1, shall be approved. 8. The overall design layout for Circulation Drive approved as proposed on the preliminary plat. 9. All rooftop mechanical equipment shall be screened. property shall be 10. All sides of the buildings shall be treated architecturally with the same materials. 11. The parking lot layout for lot 1, block 1 shall be revised, having 18' -length stalls where curbing is provided and only the amount of parking necessary for the office building shall be constructed until the adjacent property users are determined. 12. All landscaping shall be compatible in size, specie, and quantity. Effort to save existing hardwood species shall be demonstrated wherever possible. 13. All site generated storm water runoff is required to be conveyed to Pond AP -14. 14. The development is required to submit the detail plans and specifications for the proposed retaining wall construction for staff review and approval prior to final plat approval. 15. The site plan development are as a part of the details of the proposed Lot 1, Block 1, subject to further review and requirements final plat review process. '76 STANDARD CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL A. Assessments 1. This development shall accept its additional assessment obligations as defined in the staff's report in accordance with the final plat dimensions and the rates in effect at the time of final plat approval. B. Easements and Rights -of -Way 1. This development shall dedicate 10' drainage and utility easements centered over all common lot lines and adjacent to private property or public right-of-way. 2. This development shall dedicate, provide, or financially guarantee its proportionate share of the acquisition costs of additional drainage, ponding, and utility easements as required by the alignment, depth, and storage capacity of all required public utilities and streets located beyond the boundaries of this plat or outside of dedicated public right-of-way as necessary to service this development. 3. This development shall dedicate all public right-of-way and temporary slope easements for ultimate development of adjacent roadways as required by the appropriate jurisdictional agency. 4. This development shall dedicate adequate drainage and ponding easements to incorporate the required high water elevation necessitated by City storm water storage volume requirements. C. Plans and Specifications 1. All public streets and utilities necessary to provide service to this development shall be designed by a registered professional engineer in accordance with City codes and engineering standards and policies, and approved by staff prior to final plat approval. 2. A detailed grading, drainage, erosion, and sediment control plan must be prepared in accordance with current City standards and approved by staff prior to final plat approval. 3. This development shall insure that all temporary dead end public streets shall have a cul-de-sac constructed in accordance with City engineering standards. 4. A detailed landscape plan shall be submitted on the proposed grading plan and approved by staff prior to the final plat approval. The financial guarantee shall be included in the Development Contract and not released until one year after the date of installation. ci\rA STANDARD CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL PAGE TWO 5. All internal public and private streets shall be constructed within the required right-of-way in accordance with City design standards. D. Public Improvements 1. If any public improvements are to be installed under a City contract, the appropriate project must be approved by Council action prior to final plat approval. E. Permits 1. This development shall be responsible for the acquisition of all regulatory agency permits in the time frame required by the affected agency. F. Parks Dedication 1. This development shall fulfull its parks dedication requirements as recommended by the Advisory Parks and Recreation Commission and approved by Council action. G. Other 1. All standard platting and zoning conditions shall be adhered to unless specifically granted a variance by Council action. Advisory Planning Commission City Council Approved: August 25, 1987 September 15, 1987 Revised: LTS=2 STANDARD 1 CLWF 50' BLOCK I 119,6 // 1111 ( ) \ • / < 0 // '''° / / / , 11/ / • ,,/ 1 / / • / / • I 1 • r ,,,‘ *---.-- . u---- ------ , , _ --- ----- 1 ----- 1 ----- r ----- T -------A------ . . \ ..,' I - - - \ 1 I /\ I / ‘ 1 1 L / \ i I / \ 1 I i I • / \ \ \ / 1 I / `.., / \ s: PAI/I< RIDGE • • N, • /N. • - / / TRI-LANO EURVEYING CO ,INC SURVEYORS / ENGINEERS / PLANNERS ,Ow5 r•oqii • wot Pnt 4,60 NOT I WM. • i 1 e \\ / \ I / • I / • I / , I / 1 / PRELIMINARY PLAT e UTILITY PLAW GALAXIE CLIFFP—AZ Ifl PAT.. Da.r..movo.... 1 7 I • 8 KAM 15 5,4*. “..• OVA • a.... as.41, 9? CONCEPTUAL SITE PLAN GALAXIE. CLIFF PLAZA EAGAN, MINNESOT____A 4 4..N (+1 A.,.w ..1,+1 ••!-rsAJ v �c Ant; r IlTWWWI( I�;tfi+l I� PLANTING PLAN 6 PLANTING DETAILS r. GALAXIE CLIFF PLAZA EAGAN, MINNESOTA PLANTING PLAN L1 SITE DATA I ft • IN, 111.9.3 se • t• Sma Famm Le. C{4,4•184, 44.14.41, 35 E / / • • • J • • :1.711 i 1 1 i 1 1 I 1 T-11 1 1 Fr 11 1111 , !ILL 1 n- SITE PLAN 17 CJOI• LOT 1 BLOCK cl---, .... ,------- --..„ --------i, -------_ SECOND FLOOR PLAN 1 / 1 • .1 • • SIGNAGE • .-D U.N.F. SITE NOTES ,CL Rh, I Ar• LIGHTING NOTES 1,11111 LOX. 110,11.0 K.-14CIA) .0•••••,...5e rrIE L.,..nroveh t. Ler ce ee Light Fixture Legend • o ftcc...enT • ° FIRST FLOOR PLAN SOUTH ELEVATION ••••• 4 • Vanney Associates r.......-•••• / GALAXIE CLIFF PLAZA EAGAN. MINNESOTA IC) CONCEPT PLAN A2 i'\te'1 \,.._-•r'/.,•, r `- .. C, ir + \''''11:, _ \\ ,, N7' 1 + 1\\\ ,\\\ \\'\\\ • \,'�.� \,:.\ 1\1-15 U \ \Z • . J 8 • m o s�'aa \ ', Z i. !'.•-4 l'` = 4 rt ---11'• i ar, kz eT. i,4 z ::::1 . P.. F' \ ��� — L �, \ LL 1', „_ Y 1 t_�1ti\ tl \ \ : ,%.! ; �? /4,, J ,\\':e4\-- -----,. •,;Ill • : � : l ., � �; i �=".�.� \ ' \----'-:.-"./1- , T} /J/ '('l tLam- =-�- a :__.-------:-----,-:-7-----1---------::"."--\ J 1 - 1) �-'�' f_,, i �, —=J^--,- --- -<,.„;'-=, -------- i` , moi.%' i( ,, _, ___- �-. �`v Lam! )/ll f/ ` `-`•`- j j`--'^ ¢ . _.. --�,._-/_� ,) i -....\--:,--;•-:,--_z_y___/„. '•••••".7.•• - /,-/((` ,/ I,,k,,, ,- \\ iii __ ~.�. ' The low profile, rectilinear shape of the luminaire enhances most contemporary architectural styles. Widespread light distributions mean long spacings with excellent uniformity. Ana dramatic horizontal light cutoff assures minimum glare. To meet your specific lighting and esthetic requirements, Holophane offers a wide choice of options. Larnp choice Luminaire accommodates HPS lamps from 70W to 400W, metal halide from 175W to 400W, as well as mercury vapor from 175W to 400W. Color choice Luminaires are finished with a fade resistant bronze polyester powder paint applied to metal surfaces pretreated with a seven stage zinc phosphate process 10 assure corrosion resistance and then baked at 450°F to provide a hard durable coatina. Optional white, black or pewter gray colors are available. Pole choice To give maximum flexibility in design, luminaires can be matched with poles of steel or aluminum. round or square, in heights of 10 feet to 39 feet. htountina choice The multiple mounting arrangements for building facades or poles with single, double, triple or quad units lets you plan exterior lighting that actively contributes to your design concept with durable quality. Leader in light control The unique combination of the rugged borosilicate prismatic glass lens and computer designed hydroformed aluminum reflector sets Somerset apart in lighting efficiency and control. It lifts the major beam to produce long spacing capability, with sharp cutoff, while achieving excellent obscuration of the bare lamp. Five field adjustable socket settings allow alteration to the beam anole to meet varying lighting requirements. Positive cut-otf controls light pollution and trespass. An optional `forward throw" reflectorioptical assembly provides a cut-off floodlight distribution. 2 1 asiiitpc fiT ..!^L:K a ,,ter ►} I iCti-‘ pasma�".r, — -=�.� Vanney Associates 1260 Yankee Doodle Road Eagan, TI: 55121 (612) 452-0088 GALAXIE CLIFF PLAZA SITE LIGHTING DATE i 14')--.' ' FIXTURE DRAIN BY arr.1s51a: No. P . - p,77. 7 Mounting arrangements accessories WB 1A 2LA PB L2 ws 1 2A 4A rt L1 Guide specification The luminaire shall consist of a formed .051" sheet aluminum housing with cast aluminum door frame bottom enclosure to hold prismatic Tens or flat tempered glass. All exposed surfaces shall receive a seven stage cleaning and zinc phosphate pretreatment prior to painting. The finish shall be a fade resistant (color) polyester powder print baked at 450'F to provide a hard durable coating. Reflector shall be hydrofomied aluminum alloy #3002 reflector sheet, finished specular Alzak• R-5 process. Mounting bolts, washers and nuts shall be zinc -plated steel. All other screws shall be stainless steel. All electrical components (ballast, capacitor, fuses, starter board, etc.) shall be mounted to a single removeable galvanized steel plate. Socket wires shall have plug-in disconnect. Complete electrical assembly shall be removeable by unplugging socket leads and primary leads and disengaging one quarter -tum fastener. Ballast area and door shall be fully gasketed with high-temperature, closed cell material. The complete unit shall be UL listed "Suitable for Wet Locations." The unit shall be Holophane catalog number *Registered Trademark of Aluminum Co of Amenca Vanney Associates 1260 Yankee Doodle Road Eagan, TN 55121 (612) 452-0086 GALAXIE CLIFF PLAZA SITE LIGHTING DATE 11 P,u*,,,'--- & FIXTURE J i 3 DRAWN Ey Caf:1SSIa: No. '•37:1-C3-07-7 Specifications Head: One piece cast aluminum. 'A ( wall thickness with external reveal unifying head and shaft. Attachment to shalt is by four bolts concealed within the head Shaft: One piece extruded aluminum with internal tracks for attaching head and base Base: One piece cast aluminum secured to shaft by four concealed stain- less steel bolts Reflector and Socket: Formed specular Alzaka reflector panels secured to a harness which holds a porcelain medium base 4KV socket (H I.D. and incandescent), or two single -ended twin tube sockets (fluorescent). Lens: Clear fiat 3/6- thick Lexana retained by four captive pressure -limiting alien head shoulder screws. fully gasketed Ballasts: HPF – 20°F starting (H I D.). NPF 321'F. starting (fluorescent), mountea and pre -wired on a single hamess suspended within the shaft. Wire leads supplied to base Anchor Botts: Four W/e"x10"+ 2" zinc plated L hooks complete with nuts bolts, washers, couplings and rigid pressen board template Finish: Baked enamel awned over a conversion coating in Black, Dark Bronze or Natural Aluminum color as spec f ed. Certification: Underwriters Laboratories listed for wet locations See page 8 for installation details. '36" overall height available Consult Kim representative. Lamp Modes A 50W. HPS. coated E-17 or B-17 med base, 3900 initial lumens B 70W. HPS. coated E-17 or B-17 med base, 5985 initial lumens C 70W MH. coated ED -17 med. base. 5184 initial horizontal lumens D 75W MV, coated E-17 or B-17 med base. 3150 initial lumens E (2) 13W. Compact Fluorescent, twin tube. 900 initial lumens each. F 60W. Incandescent, T-10 I F. med. base, 745 initial lumens Initial Horizontal Footcandles for 42" Fixture 37%i Light Cen er) Tanney Associates 1260 Yankee Doodle Road Eagan. Y_`: 55121 (612) 452-0088 — Typical Half DATE ),I''''-`'`---- :4 6' DRAWN BY 1Sn 1SSIOt: N0. 77-- - -,1?, ; 3. 1 U k 3' fOr.I 12' 0 3' 6' 9' 12' 15' 18' 15' 21' Tanney Associates 1260 Yankee Doodle Road Eagan. Y_`: 55121 (612) 452-0088 GALAXIE CLIFF PLAZA SITE LIGHTING DATE ),I''''-`'`---- :4 FIXTURE C DRAWN BY 1Sn 1SSIOt: N0. 77-- - -,1?, ; LoG CLIFF- h� �� .xi ,�'o a1/ / I /:::i::::::::::: - :71, i ' —1 Irl r //� �,.: 1 —�0.7:;,..__81 �� ��)Jl l '/ L fir' iii ..t.,..,..,,......,..„........ _... -" / •••••/ ••ru•... ` ......_____...\----:\\4' - 1 �/ j.� OOOOOO \ .- ::..... :... ....... ;........ \, 1( (mac- x..2..1 r3':..... I, `i! J., ) b ________ ____------ ,-----J-- ;:::',-:;71:71-- -1----------: --/;://--;-;,/,(------"(:---:_:*r{i..iih... ............................. ..... ...................... .... i.::.....v..i:_..:-:h74::K) ,.41.,.: :,--7-,,,,,,-c:".---.. ''�\� ;1`, \ `,,` � \ �......K... _7:.:2::.^.:75::•..Lf/,./�)/ �/ \1� /'`\ \///. �\ ` iaRcrr Li /////;_�.._ :5....:.: V\ -Q;\ ;- , / '! �fl, 1 ��=~1{'\1 ���-\\j 1't(//ice;= - "�-` L __�- '/ ' ( I'� f1 11, i ��� _ ,,, f ; r--_ __ \ i. i. i . II /f ' 1/If ( _, ' \ — _ - ,; ; . 11,;1 \( (' ,)11111 / Ili ill 1/- \-4:,,'('—f--=__—:-..---------1,,\11>tr� �7..;,= \�,\`: �,�1'i ) --) 1 ) t \‘ \ —77-,‘7,g-77-- , , / 7 -----___Nik/F:-_ -- ----_---_;-='-l- A l ) '4/7- ) ' ------'-'-' / �iiII S( �' f7 /" , / ,/,/,/, /,�'''�%�\�\�• ,----.:----77iat/7,,,z,' �// 1/1/44i/i/iLl/L_//,///(1/1-(,..:)___,) i,;�l�„��� - :;. � -/,�' ��) � ,".1)1,,e,// .� rii 1i (��/cif\ ��` 1 1 i`, � �,;� �/ ( , iiti/ ( . ' .-111 it IL:_,( ___/:ri,c_' f 1 , , „ iliii ; z,,, • ....._,,,„ -_-__________::,_______________ k \N A. •-i--.---:-.7-.: - • f -, -—/7 ............... ...---. • 0• //.`,/ d'J'' \ • \� �J `1 1 ! J / \\ \ i. //• •! 1 1 / �_ i;1 /� •\• \\� ARK R=OGE- / // ,O`/7"t'''' ,�� •!/ / ` / ,�\ )z \�0 ti / _ • • • _TR,./Ano suRvrvING Co ,inc y.I(HS S ,60o WA -TE 5. $ 7:2cy4Ie- (-ZP4 4DE � A V A t 1`•• Z.75 A-c2Es �6it_tT\! CKRRG E GALq EL >.4r FiAreUTILITYPLAN •� .�: ••••••-- ,-••• X 1E CL7vJ- p LAZA I� �v� 2 • j,,mmkj22) MARI, cr` D. • O' I 1112..• 37.7/ 63.0 1- 11 DRIVER VEST! LJ,C EN TER! i I !'e32.5/56.0 30.8/550. ,• " 58.7/-.7.8,5) 18' —p• "..`r %If 32LL I I / 116 72. 3/ 82.0 • * Rr 3CE C.L1Fr /74c--•,--.7., ADDITION VA 85.8/ L'r• ammo 41 momm r-. 87:0 \I ' 4 M G GROUND STORAGE I H. W. L. 1150 • i ,41 I 25.8/ 33.0 DAKOTA COUNTY PARK SUBJECT PARCEL FIG 43 city of eagan PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMEN WATER MASTER PLAN approved: standard plate 4: to. , --- -.-i - .._ . ___ ; IT/ . • ., ' et -• i -':,-1-,:.`< '_•"\ r _ / ' •:'-'-'7-F ---')---1 AP -50 AP -25 880.5 ` A P-4‘2-''--- :1‘ Eig 6.0 5-42.< '. ii 89 4. 0 888.5 _ ,____ , ' 8950 A_-.5 s 111-7 _ _ A P -13 . -;‘..2, ,'Ic-i---9.9--• - 4P--7--- -IL:- I! ''. I.._ I _r.,.. '-' ' 908.2 co t.74-7.,._%:_ f , '..-,- 1 !1 ' '; f "..>--; I— 1 . , i . ' , \ \ ' I! • .7- : . __ . . 11 , • . 'BP--32- C•J 1 , ; , I; , 71;,--— P14.0 ' 933.9 / • • \ 1' c. — .1),ZR'E,-, AP -44 . 9376 !.._ - A = f f ,„... .., , .• 4., .. 1 ,1" --: 31- • 915.9 • 1 9/80 /9. A-_-ee 1 ), ...„' \ I! .. A--6-vv / : -.----'=- AR -29 rl -C)--1>' 'f':""r \ , // ' 12t. 930.6 - 'r=1 --77------':--'-----,--- 20.4 ' ..."., .:,.,•.....: .93 8.8 , . - . . . ,,,---_- \ 7 ,/ AP -167 , .;..,:;'•,(.1.,:•*--AP:=48 • — - ---r-,..- 0J ---',C1.---- -'., 7 , 972.2,06:.00., _:: .L___ • -,., ,i-,>. 920.6 •:-.."-_--`t44,4. --.. . LI: r . " ,-- 7-4'7.---:-. i AP -15-'9255 - - . , , ,,,-,....! ci 1 i , 909.8 - -7 :1=-1' l'-'. • --=-:=2"-=--- s -- ,TER''.1 ._-_,, )//z»\,, , 92 ; 2 , -.7 '''' • " ' ''./ ..-., :.... L-.11__• -922.0 .-- — , / s4F4,41L-_-;-. .-----, .....09 I -, . • AP -49 881.7 NI; 1 889.0 \b 900.0 • ;" AP -40‘57 AP -11.• 912.1 889.2 H 8947 934.0 AP -17 y AP -34 / /'/b/ 9388 „ 926.0 qg 9 40 '• , '; ) / r/ -1 1 -I ..':/ AP33 1 --.- . 9800 9853 .----- -,,------- ,-,i-- ,... I .• .. i ,',1 .. .: I I .--- T--i_ \ \---- A-zz / `-- A-zz 0,AX0 COUNTY A -yy muommiralillftla "NI r moimr 4.17 \-▪ \ \ APPLE vi VALLEY ,)) 0, SUBJECT PARCEL ...▪ ............... FIG*( city of eagan PUBLIC 7 M WORKS DEPARTMEN STORM SEWER MASTER PLAN approved: standard plate 4: • MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING EAGAN ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION EAGAN, MINNESOTA August 23, 1988 A regular meeting of the Eagan Advisory Planning Commission was held on Tuesday, August 23, 1988, at 7:00 o'clock p.m. at the Eagan Municipal Center. Present were Chairman Pawlenty, Members Garry, Voracek, Trygg, Miller, Merkley and Graves. Also present were Assistant Planner Jim Sturm, Assistant City Engineer Mike Foertsch, and City Attorney James Sheldon. AGENDA Garry moved, Merkley seconded, the motion to approve the agenda as presented. All voted in favor. MINUTES July 26. 1988 Minutes. Chairman Pawlenty stated the Planning Commission members had not received copies of the minutes and they would be reviewed at the next meeting. Chairman Pawlenty informed the Commission members and the audience that at 11:00 o'clock p.m., the Commission would consider whether to continue with the meeting or reschedule some matters for a later date. Chairman Pawlenty also explained the agenda procedure to the audience. GALAXIE CLIFF PLAZA - TRI -LAND COMPANIES AND WILLIAM4 SOULES The first public hearing of the evening was convened by Chairman Pawlenty in regard to the re -zoning of 10 (+ or -) Agricultural acres to a Limited Business Planned Development district consisting of one lot and three outlots for future development and a preliminary plat containing 25.36 acres located south of Clift Road, west of Galaxie Avenue in the Northwest Quarter of Section 32. Assistant Planner Jim Sturm statea separate applications had been submitted to the City requesting a re -zoning of 5.7 Agricultural acres to a Planned Development district for Limited Business use only, and a preliminary plat of 25.36 acres consisting of one 2.7 acre lot for an office building and two outlots containing 3.0 acres for the future development with Limited Business zoning. The remaining 19.7 acres remain Agriculturally zoned and are being platted as outlots so the legal descriptions and over all road layout Page 2/PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES August 23, 1988 can be resolved. No development can occur on any of the outlots without going through the public hearing process. Mr. Sturm further stated the previous proposal and development partnership was directed by the City Council to revise the overall plan to include Limited Business use only. Since then, the partnership has been dissolved. Tri -Lana Properties will still develop the area on the west side of Circulation Drive and William Soules will retain rights to the Agricultural -zoned land between Galaxie Avenue and Circulation Drive. The proposal includes both names for platting requirements only. The approximately 3 acre, RB zoned piece in the southwest corner is not included with either the re -zoning or the preliminary plat request. Mr. Sturm stated the overall Circulation system remains the same as the previous proposal. The street would be constructea from Galaxie Avenue to the south end of the otfice builaing lot with the initial phase. That roaa would be extenaea as development occurs ana would ultimately nave to provide access to tne RB piece. Tri -Lana Companies has agreed to the PD concept (zoning) tor the ottice lot ana two outlots so an overall aesthetic compatibility can be achieved. Code requires 116 parking stalls ana 171 have been proviaea for potential cross parking. Only the amount necessary for tne office building woula be constructeduntil the aajacent users are determined. Only 18 toot length stalls would be required were curbing is provided. Mr. Sturm further stated the two-story office builaing tor Merrill Lynch remains the same as with the previous submittal. It would be constructed of decorative, pre -cast panels ana anodized aluminum windows. The landscape plan would save a large stand of trees along Circulation Drive on Lot 1. The proposed new plantings would be compatible with the existing native material and would add to the reforestation effect as opposed to the typical urban tree-scape. A retaining wall on the north side of the entrance from Galaxie Avenue would preserve a stand of existing trees. City Attorney Jim Sheldon updated the Commission on the background regarding the property. He further informed the Commission of the history of the Comprehensive Guide Plan and outlined the APC's responsibility with regard to the current proposal. Brad Swenson stated he was the developer for a portion of the proposal and he is also the surveyor/engineer for the remaining portion of the site. He explained his ties with the City or Eagan ana gave a brief summary of the site history. He statea that tnere nave been many meetings regarding the proposal ana he summarized the meetings with the Council ana the Planning Commission. Mr. Swenson stated he had met with Bob Byers, City Trattic Engineer, ana Mr. Byers felt that there would be an increase in traffic during the peak iii Page 3/PLANNING COM.MMISSION MEETING MINUTES August 23, 1988 demand period if the area were either residential or one type of Limited Business use (all orfice) . Assistant City Engineer Mike Foertsch stated Galaxie Avenue was sufficient by design to handle the proposed Limited Business use. He stated Cliff Road would be a problem ana that improvements would need to be mace. He explained the "trip distribution" concept ot measuriny traffic flow. Brad Swenson stated that only one use would increase the traffic congestion and that complementary uses would reduce it. Bob Vanning addressed the noise problems. He stated vegetation used as a noise barrier was not good. He stated that mass (earth, buildings, etc.) reduces noise problems. Brad Swenson stated that the Comprehensive Guide Plan was approved throughout all reviews. He f ur tner stated he had met with the Chief, City Administrator and Councilmembers ana that no safety concerns were expressed to him. He statea the Chief does not see a problem with the traffic for the site. He sited several City staff statements that Limited Business was considered in the planning of this station. Mr. Swenson reiterated his request for approval. Bob Close explained the site development. He informed the Commission of which vegetation would remain on the site. Bob Vanning reviewed with the Commission the building size, the parking requirements and the lighting. Commission -member Garry requested a review of the changes from the previous building design. Mr. Vanning updated the Commission on the changes. He stated the new plans would be more modern and there would be glass used instead ot stone. The developer questioned the proposed Condition No. 4 regarding the trash being contained within the office building. Mr. Sturm stated the trash could be contained outdoors if it were attached to the building and the same materials would be used as the materials on the building. The developer informed the Commission he would like to reserve his right to speak after the public hearing. Chairman Pawlenty informed_the public that the Commission had previously heard comments regarding this development. He statea everyone would be heard and requested the public to focus their comments on the revised proposal. Dean Brock, 1844 Narvik Court, stated he has concerns regarding the increased tratfic on Narvik Court. His main concern was safety Page 4/PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES August 23, 1988 for the children and also the noise. He feels the proposed uses are not complementary with the neighborhood. He feels there is no definite plan. Katherine Schotz, 4963 Safari Circle, informed the Commission she was concerned regarding health, welfare and safety. She asxea what the basis was for the adequate traffic conclusion. She stated there was an increase in traffic pursuant to the study. She asked it the developer owned the property ana what type of improvements woula be mane on Clitf. The developer stated he owns trie property outright. Mary Winchester, 1830 Karis Way, gave a brier history of the proposal. She said the City should not allow piece -meal development or spot zoning. She statea that all questions has not been answerea, that the site needed an erosion plan, ana retaining wall plan. She stated there were sound problems and that this was toot-in-the-aoor zoning. She urged rejection. Tom Klein, 4580 Blackhawk, requested a clarification of Outlots A and B. He also requested that language disallowing Roaasiae Business be put in the approving motion. William Fitzgerald, 1835 Karis Way, applauded the previous rejection of the proposal. She stated she had concerns regarding traffic and safety and wanted shared parking. She asked the APC to stay within guidelines. Chairman Pawlenty stated any outlot development would go through the customary City procedure. He stated that regarding the PUD, the C::ty could not make Mr. Soules work with Mr. Swenson. Lanna Hanson, 1848 Narvik Court, questioned why there was an increase in the parking spaces. She requested a history of the neighborhood as well as the development. Mike Mayhen, 4731 Westwind, challenged the legal interpretation. He had concerns regarding noise. Also questioned what the aavantages would be to the City and questioned the remaining outlots. He asked what the incentive would be for the developer to complete as plannea and what recourse the City would have for non-compliance. Jeff Carlson, 4730 Westwind, stated he felt Mr. Swenson did not owned the property. He presented documentation to that effect. Barbara Ferris, 4924 Safari Court South, had concerns regaraing the traffic. She stated the construction equipment would hamper traffic-. She felt the plan was incomplete and the zoning was inappropriate. She stated the study shows that there is enough development. i�3 Page 5/PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES August 23, 1988 Terry Davis, Safari Pass, asked the Commission to rethink the zoning. He statea that case law is misleading and that the City should consider that the overall neighborhood wants residential zoning. Helen Hanson commended the Planning Commission for listening to the people of Eagan. Joany Davis, Safari Pass, asked if she could comment on some of the developer's comments. Chairman Pawlenty stated that she must address only the comments made by the developer. A member of the public submitted a traffic study conducted by the City. Commission -member Graves asked if that was where the 4400 number came from. Mr. Foertsch stated he was correct. The developer stated that other construction in the area increases Cliff's present load. Chairman Pawlenty stated the Commission has also received a density report and outlined the report. He questionea it restaurant was a permitted use within Limited Business. Commission -member !Miller stated that restaurant concept was not the question at hang. The developer stated the property in question was zoned Limited Business according to the Comprehensive Guide Plan. Cnairman Pawlenty askea the hours for the Merrill Lynch office. The aeveloper stated they were 9 to 5 during the weekdays, Saturday, 8 to 5 ana Sunday, 1 to 4. Chairman Pawlenty asked if there would be a neea tor more parking. Mr. Sturm stated the guidelines were minimums, not maximums. The developer stated that Merrill Lynch required the parking. Cnairman Pawlenty questioned what the advantage to the City would be to approve now. Mr. Sturm stated there is nothing in Code that says Limited Business is not met in the area. Mr. Graves asked what the City had to gain. Mr. Sturm stated the City would retain control over the development. Commission -member Miller asked if the City needs reasonable reasons to deny the proposal. Mr. Sheldon stated he was correct. Chairman Pawlenty asked what recourse the City would have if the developer did not comply. Mr. Sturm explained several recourse measures such as the development contract ana a letter of intent. Chairman Pawlenty questioned a lawsuit. Mr. Sturm statea there would be financial guarantees. Chairman Pawlenty questionea the large truck issue. Mr. Foertsch stated Galaxie is a neighborhood collector street with a capacity of 9 tons. He stated the City could not prohibit trucks.- However, other roads were being developed. Commission -member Miller asked if it would be the developer's responsibility. Mr. Graves pointed out that the point was that the trucks would decrease the safety in the area. Mr. Garry statea that Page 6/PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES August 23, 1988 any action by the APC would not prevent the truck traffic. Commission -member Trygg reminded the Commission that a PD would give the City control of the project. Chairman Pawlenty stated new proposals would be analyzed as they come. Barbara Ferris had several questions and statements regarding the traffic flow. There was a lengthy discussion regarding the traffic problems. Assistant City Engineer Mike Foertsch informed the Commission that Clift Road would be upgraded to improve the traffic situation and reduce the pressure on Galaxie. Commission -member Garry stated Galaxie would not be widened. Chairman Pawienty questioned the ownership of the property. The developer stated he does have a Warranty Deed and a Contract for Deed and that possibly the County was back -logged in their recording process. Mr. Garry asked the developer it he did own the property. The developer stated he did own the property. Commission -member Miller questioned if the developer needed to own the property. Mr. Sheldon stated that when a PUD is entered into, the developer must own the property. The developer stated there would be no retail at the corner and that the retail study addressed only retail. He further stated Councilmember Egan noted that there was Limited Business use, not Residential in the area. City Attorney Jim Sheldon stated tnat a restaurant would be a conditional use. Harley Hansen, 1848 Narvik Court, has concerns regarding the ownership of the property. Jeff Carlson stated he was a licensed abstractor and would be able to determine the ownership of the property. William Soules stated Mr. Swenson does own the property in question and he felt that there was not spot -zoning. Commission -member Voracek stated that if the proposal were approved, Mr. Swenson would have to prove ownership of the property. Mary Winchester questioned if the proposal was a PD. Commission -member Graves stated Mr. Swenson would get PD zoning with the Limited Business use. Commission -member Miller stated the Commission was not addressing the outlots at the present time. Mr. Voracek stated that Town Centre is all PD. There was a long discussion with Barbara Ferris regarding the Rahn Cliff PD. Mr. Garry questioned if she would support a PD for the entire area. Ms. Ferris said it would depend upon the plan. Mr. Graves stated that last time the Commission asked for clarification ins Page 7/PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES August 23, 1988 on the Comprehensive Guide Plan. He stated the Commission did not consider the uses. He stated now that it was broken up, the City would have to work with the present plan. Commission -member Merkley stated that in regard to the Rahn Cliff development, the Commission approved only certain lots and that the developer had to come back for further review. Mr. Miller agreed with Mr. Graves that the plan should be considered as one major concept. He stated that retail business would never be a consideration for this particular property. He stated a lawsuit costs money just to pursue it and that it snoula be taken into consideration as taxpayers do not want to pay tor neealess lawsuits. Chairman Pawlenty stated that the City Council has given the Commission a clear direction. Commission -member Trygg stated the developer has rights as well as the neighboring resiaents. Mr. Garry asked what the plans were for Outlots A and B. The developer stated that Outlot B was proposed for a restaurant site which would be a sit-down restaurant and there would be no liquor served. Mr. Garry questioned the number of seatings in the restaurant. The developer stated there would be 6,000 square feet. The developer further stated that everyone concernea is working very hard on the development and that they are frustrated by the loss of the last plan. He stated that the use of Outlot A was uncertain at the time and that the market would decide. Commission -member Voracek asked if the parking would be shared. The developer stated the parking would be shared as it allows the vegetation to remain the same. Commission -member Voracek questioned the traffic on Galaxie and questioned the speed limit. Mr. Foertsch stated the speed limit was 35mph. Mr. Voracek stated he felt there should be a check witn the police to monitor the traffic in the area. Commission -member Graves asked how much of Circulation Drive would be completed. The developer statea it would be completes to the end of Lot 1, Block 1. Mr. Graves questioned the proposed condition regarding the retaining wall. The developer stated that the current vegetation is "junk". He explained the retaining wall location and construction to the Commission. Voracek moved, Graves seconded, the motion to close the public hearing and to approve the preliminary plat containing 25.36 acres Page 8/PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES August 23, 1988 located south of Cliff Road, west of Galaxie Avenue in the Northwest Quarter of Section 32, for Galaxie Cliff Plaza. Commission -member Miller stated he would prefer one large unit and felt there was a short change by just one piece. Commission -member Graves stated he hopes the developers would get back together in their development. He further stated he would like to see the Retail Business eliminated. Mr. Voracek questionea which conditions would apply on the motion. It was agreed to withdraw the motion and make one two-part motion. Mr. Voracek withdrew his motion and Mr. Graves withdrew his second. Voracek movea, Graves seconded, the motion to close the public hearing and to approve separate applications for re -zoning of 10 (+ or -) Agricultural acres to a Limited Business Planned Development district consisting of one lot and three outlots for future development and a preliminary plat containing 25.36 acres located south of Cliff Roaa, west of Galaxie Avenue ana the Northwest Quarter of Section 32 (Galaxie Cliff Plaza), subject to the following conditions: 1. These standard conditions of plat approval as adopted by Council action on September 15, 1987 shall be complied with: Al, Bl, B2, B3, B4, Cl, C2, C3, C4, C5, D1, El, Fl and Gl . 2. A Planned Development Agreement shall be entered into for a five-year per ioa. 3. A 50' no -building or parking buffer area shall be placed along the Galaxie Avenue property line. Also south of Circulation Drive. 4. The trash shall be contained within the office building on Lot 1, Block 1, or be attached using the same materials as the office building. 5. All signage shall be subject to the one-time sign fee of $2.50_per square foot and other sign ordinance requirements. 6. All outlots shall be reviewed by the Advisory Planning Commission and the City Council. 7. The shared parking concept, parking up to the north property line on Lot 1, Block 1, shall be approvea. 8. The overall design layout for Circulation Drive shall be approved as proposed on the preliminary plat. 9. All rooftop mechanical equipment shall be screenea. 1 'I'? Page 9/PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES August 23, 1988 10. All sides of the buildings shall be treatea architecturally with the same materials. 11. The parking lot layout tor Lot 1, Block 1, shall be revisea, having 18' -length stalls where curbing is provided. 12. All landscaping shall be compatible in size, specie, and quantity. Effort to save existing hardwooa species snail be aemonstrated wherever possible. 13. All site generated storm water runoff is required to be conveyed to Pond AP -14. 14. The development is required to submit the detail plans and specifications for the proposed retaining wall construction for staff review and approval prior to final plat approval. 15. The site plan details of the proposed Lot 1, Block 1, development are subject to further review and requirements as a part of the final plat review process. 16. The developer agrees that the following uses will be prohibited in the Planned Development: radio/tv, outdoor storage, lodges, swimming pools, garden store, movie theatres and municipal -type buildings. All voted in favor. Chairman Pawlenty and the Commission -members informed the public that because of the time frame, the Commission would be holding public hearings for the Seneca Plant Addition and the Wescott Square Addition at the meeting and the remaining items on the agenda unaer New Business would be continued to a Special Advisory Planning Commission meeting on August 30, 1988. SENECA PLANT ADDITION - METROPOLITAN WASTE CONTROL COMMISSION Chairman Pawlenty opened the public hearing regarding the preliminary plat consisting of 87.83 acres for the expansion of the Seneca Water Treatment Plant locatea west of Comanche Roaa in the west half of Section 17 and the east half of Section 18. City Planner Dale Runkle stated that as a result of concerns raised by adjacent residential -property owners at the last month's APC meeting, a neighborhood meeting was held on August 22, 1988. He stated that staff had further reviewed the proposed grading plan and the visual effect the proposed mounds of earth would have on the adjacent residential properties. He stated the two proposed westerly mounds of earth would definitely affect the residential properties' view of the Minnesota River. He stated that an additional concern Agenda Information Memo September 6, 1988, City Council Meeting MEDIAN CUT/BLACKHAWR PLAZA SHOPPING CENTER C. Proposal for Median Cut on County Road 30 for Blackhawk Plaza Project --At the August 16, 1988 City Council meeting, Mr. Luther Stalland, representing the Blackhawk Plaza Shopping Center Development, appeared and requested a left turn median cut to provide entrance to the Blackhawk Shopping Center for traffic moving east bound on Diffley Road. At that meeting, the City staff represented that the City's consultant, Mr. Glen Van Wormer of SEH, had recently recommended that the median cut not be allowed with reasons that are consistent with the Dakota County transportation standards. Mr. Stalland claimed that Mr. Van Wormer's recent position was inconsistent with a previous position on a median cut and asked that a meeting be held to further discuss this matter. The City Council continued the item until the September 6 meeting to allow Mr. Van Wormer, representatives of the City staff and Mr. Stalland to meet and further discuss the median cut. Attached is a letter from Mr. Van Wormer to the City of Eagan that recommends that the City not take positive action on the median opening. Mr. Van Wormer further states in his conclusion that Dakota County is responsible for traffic operations along Diffley Road and has been somewhat adamant in their refusal to provide a median opening. The fact that the County has granted anentrance on to Diffley Road based on the agreement that the developer would not pursue a median opening, indicates the concern that the County has over proper operation of the roadway. For a copy of Mr. Van Wormer's letter, refer to pages l ZC through A7.1.,S. Mr. Stalland has also presented this office with a letter discussing grave dissatisfaction with the outcome of the August 22 meeting with Vile City's consult, Mr. Van Wormer, is also attached on pages 9 through to for your review. A letter from BRW garding this issue is also enclosed on pages through ;). ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny action that would suggest to the Dakota County Board of Commissioners that an access be either granted or denied to the median on Diffley Road providing access to the Blackhawk Plaza Shopping Center or recommend no action, allowing Mr. Stalland to present his case to the Board of Commissioners. SPECIAL NOTE: There is additional information that is not copied in this packet that was supplied in the August 16 packet referenced as pages 229 through 243. If any member of the City Council would like a copy of the various letters supporting Mr. Stalland's request and the original memo from BRW, please notify this office and a copy will be made available. \\F\ ENGINEERS • ARCHITECTS f PLANNERS August 22, 1988 222 EAST LITTLE CANADA ROAD, 5T PAUL, MINNESOTA 55117 612 4840272 Mr. Dale Runkle City Planner City of Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, Minnesota 55122 Dear Mr. Runkle: RE: Eagan, Minnesota Diffley Road Blackhawk Plaza Access SEH File No. 88077 Some time ago the City verbally asked our reaction to opening the median on Diffley Road between Blackhawk Drive and Interstate 35- E. Because of some confusion to our verbal response we responded on July 25 with a short memorandum. The issue is becoming more complex. After phone conversations and a meeting with you and the developers representatives on August 19, we obtained additional background information. To best understand the situation, the following information is provided. In a May 1985 report by BRW, Inc., three alternates were provided. Alternate 1 was a right turn in and right turn out only access to Diffley Road. Alternate 2 provided for a median opening with full access in all directions. Alternate 3 provided for a eastbound left turn through the median opening but the outbound left turn to go eastbound on Diffley Road would be prohibited. The report provided traffic volume information and a discussion of the alternates. Recommendation of the report was alternate 2. In June 1985, Eagan City Council approved the development with a number of conditions. One condition maintained was that the applicant shall work with Dakota County to insure that the primary access to the development is from County Road 30. Apparently there were some problems in obtaining Dakota County and Mn/DOT approval of the access including a full median opening. SHORT ELLIOTT HENDRICKSON INC. ST PAUL, MINNESOTA CHIPPEWA FALLS, WISCONSIN Mr. Dale Runkle August 22, 1988 Page #2 An August 27, 1986, letter from the developer's engineer indicated that the right in, right out driveway provided reasonable access for the plaza. A follow-up letter to Dakota County from the developer indicated agreement with three conditions to Dakota County and Mn/DOT granting a right turn in and right turn out access on Diffley Road. One of the conditions was that there should be no further requests for a break in the center median for a left turn access into or out of the Blackhawk Plaza project. Based on these conditions, Dakota County and Mn/DOT agreed to the right in, right out driveway. The driveway and the center were built with this type of access. The developer has since provided letters from both Amoco Petroleum Company and Phillips Petroleum Company indicating their desire for full access through a median opening onto Diffley Road. These letters were dated April 5, and April 15, 1988. A more recent letter, dated July 21, 1988, also indicated the desirability of a full median cut. The developer is proposing to provide a limited median opening by providing for an eastbound left turn into the center but a right turn on outbound movement. This is identical to alternate 3 considered in the original 1985 study. SEH reacted to the apparent request for a full median opening Last April. Our recommendation was not to proceed. Apparently there was some confusion in that the developers engineers wrote a :letter on May 17, 1988, to the developer indicating that SEH approved of the concept of allowing eastbound traffic to enter I3lackhawk Plaza with questions relative to signal coordination and estimated costs. We again reviewed the proposal for median cut on County Road 30, dated April 26, 1988, and determined that the recommendation was still for a full median opening based on the May 1985 report and the letters from the Petroleum Companies. In our letter of July 25, 1988, we reviewed our previously work, all available reports, and concluded that the median opening was not justified and recommended that the City drop further consideration. The proposal for median cut on County Road 30, dated August 1, 1988, still referred to the preferred alternative as alternate 2, modified in the July 27 letter to yourself from BRW indicating a desire for a modified median opening resembling alternate 3 in the initial proposal. This proposal assumed that a left turn signal at the median opening would be warranted and could be coordinated since coordination would be required in a westbound direction only. dal Mr. Dale Runkle August 22, 1988 Page #3 The proposed median opening would serve approximately 900 eastbound left turning vehicles per day. Currently, this traffic either turns left at Blackhawk Road or makes a U-turn in the I - 35E interchange area. However, the restriction would not permit an outbound left turn movement which constitutes approximately .1,600 vehicles per day based on the directional distribution of traffic and the 7,000 estimated vehicle trips per day. After reviewing all of the information which we have access to, and considering the operation of Diffley Road both now and as is forecasted in the future, we will continue to recommend that the City not push for the median opening. Most of the traffic utilizing the Blackhawk Plaza Center is local in nature. Approximately 10 percent comes off the freeway, and much of this can be considered local. Local traffic will find a way in and out of the center without wrong way movements or other dangerous maneuvers. The improvement to traffic flow is to permit 900 vehicles to make a left turn at the median opening rather than a left turn at Blackhawk Road. That reduction in traffic on Blackhawk Road would be 900 vehicles per day maximum. The developer's concept for providing logical and symmetrical access can be adhered to by having eastbound entering traffic use Blackhawk Road. The problem of the symmetrical access remains with the outbound left turn to go eastbound on Diffley Road which is not addressed by alternate 3. In addition, both realtors and oil companies have indicated the desire for a full median opening. We also continue to have some concerns about the operation with the mid block median opening. A traffic signal would not be justified based on volume warrants since the inbound volume is relatively low. However, there remains a considerable amount of conflicts because of the heavy westbound traffic. Traffic comes from both westbound Diffley Road across the I -35E bridge and from the southbound 35E off ramp. We anticipate a P.M. peak hour volume over approximately 1,600 vehicles. The intersection of Blackhawk Road and Diffley Road could see a reduction in peak hour volumes of 90 left turns. However, we do not forecast the intersection operations will be so close to capacity that the 90 turns will be the difference between operating satisfactorily and unsatisfactorily. Mr. Dale Runkle August 22, 1988 Page #4 We therefore recommend that the City not take positive action on the median opening. Dakota County is responsible for traffic operations along Diffley Road and has been somewhat adamant in their refusal to provide a median opening. The fact that the County has granted an entrance onto Diffley Road based on the agreement that the developer would not pursue a median opening indicates the concern that the County has over proper operation of the, roadway. If you have any questions or need any additional information, please feel free to contact us. GVW/me cc: Bob Byers, SEH Sincerely, Glen Van Wormer, Manager Transportation Engineering Department la � LAW OFFICES STALLAND 8c STALLAND ONE CORPORATE CENTER FINANCIAL PLAZA 7251 OHMS LANE :MSINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55435 LUTHER M. STALLAND K. PETER STALLAND August 29, 1988 Mr. Thomas Hedges City Administrator City of Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55122 Dear Tom: TELEPHONE (012) 835-5577 I am enclosing Van Wormer's letter opinion dated August 22 which is "off the wall" considering what was agreed to at the meeting Runkle, Van Wormer, Wolsfeld and I had on Friday, August 19. Van Wormer's new letter is nothing but a warmed over review of the past which has nothing to do with what we proposed to the council on August 16 and our subsequent meeting with Van Wormer on August 19. The whole point of the August 19 meeting, directed by you and the council, was to try to reach a reasonable solution to the access problem for the Blackhawk Plaza project. This was done after considerable discussion. All four of us agreed that the solution was a left in only median cut on Diffley to Blackhawk Plaza with a full stop at the southbound I35E ramp and Diffley which I agreed would be paid for by the developer. This would require the elimination of the ramp yield right turn and the moving of the semaphore to create a full stop. Both Van Wormer and Wolsfeld estimated this would cost between $10,000 and $15,000. Van Wormer at the end of the meeting agreed that he would draft and present to Runkle a report of feasibility for the above median cut. He said he would work on it Friday after our meeting so that his staff would have it ready Monday. He also agreed to call Wolsfeld Friday night if there were any major changes or departures from what we had agreed upon. He did not call Wolsfeld at anytime and the report letter was not ready until Wednesday when I personally called about it and went to Van Wormer's office to pick up a copy of same. Runkle never got the original until Thursday. To put it bluntly, either Van Wormer has double-dealed all of us or his staff subordinate did not correctly portray what he had agreed to at the August 19 meeting. Mr. Thomas Hedges City Administrator Page 2 August 29, 1988 Prior to the September 6 council meeting at Kunkle's and my suggestion, Wolsfeld will contact Van Wormer and try to resolve once again this dilemma. If Van Wormer refuses to address the single issue of the partial median cut and recommend its feasiblity as he agreed to on August 19, then I say the Eagan council and staff must disregard his two previous reports and act on the revised proposal of the developer. I respectfully submit that unless Mr. Van Wormer provides the Eagan staff and council with an affirmative feasibility report in accordance with the agreement of rill tithe August 19 meeting, the council should act favorably to the developer noti i 1 sEanding. Very' �rulyy /`i t the Y� t' 14-arf vm enclosure cc: Richard Wolsfeld Dale Runkle PLANNING TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING ARCHITECTURE BENNETT, RINGROSE. WOLSPELD, JARVIS. GARDNER, INC. THRESHER SQUARE 700 THIRD STREET SOUTH MINNEAPOLIS. MN 55415 • PHONE 612/370-0700 September 1, 1988 Mr. Dale Runkle City Planner City of Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55122 Dear Mr. Runkle: As you know, a meeting was held on August 19, 1988, between Glen Van Wormer, Luther Stallard, yourself and me to discuss Blackhawk Plaza's request for a change in access to the development. My minutes of the meeting reflect the following: o You went over the background and the request of the City Council that the meeting be held. o I went over the proposal of the Blackhawk Plaza and BRW's analysis of the request for the change in access and the offer to signalize the access into Blackhawk Plaza. o Mr. Van Wormer did not know that the request was for an eastbound left turn access into the Plaza and no left turn out of the Plaza. He stated "removal of the left turn out will help significantly." o Mr. Van Wormer and I discussed the additional improvements resulting from changing the geometrics of the I -35E southbound to westbound movement from the current situation of a "free" right -turn to a standard turning radius that requires vehicles to stop. Mr. Van Wormer said he favored this geometric treatment and felt it would result in better traffic operation. I agreed. o It was agreed that the best staging plan would be to make the roadway changes required for the median break and the right -turn change at the I -35E off -ramp, and proceed with the signalization of the left -turn in access to the center when the need was demonstrated. o Mr. Stallard agreed to pay for the roadway changes. o You stated that a condition of the building permit was that no curb -outs could be provided along the access drive to Diffley from the center. Mr. Van Wormer supported this and stated it would help traffic flow within the center. DAVIDJ BENNETT DONALD RINGROSE RICHARDPWOLSFELD PETERE JARVIS LAWRENCEJ GARDNER THOMASFCARROLL CRAIGA AMUNDSEN DONALD E HUNT MARK G SWENSON JOHN R McNAMARA RICHARD D PILGRIM DALE N BECKMANN DENNIS J. SUTLIFF MINNEAPOLIS DENVER 12(4) PHOENIX Dale Runkle September 1, 1988 Page 2 o Mr. Van Wormer said he would write a letter to you on his opinion on the access. It looked acceptable to him, but he wanted to do additional ana- lysis and think about it. If there was a problem, he would call me at home on Friday. He did not call. I received a copy of Mr. Van Wormer's letter of August 22, 1988, that states " . . . we will continue to recommend that the City not push for the median opening . . . we therefore recommend that the City not take positive action on the median opening." Without repeating the reasons, the major concerns appear to be: o The County has been adamant in their refusal to provide a median opening. o The local traffic will not be confused by circuitous access. o Traffic operations of the mid -block opening. BRW's opinion is that the issue is complex and involves trade-offs. In summary, the situation is that the developer has proposed the following: o An eastbound to northbound only access into Blackhawk Plaza; this partial break in the median would allow vehicles from the west to access the center. The movement from the plaza to go east would not be allowed at this location. o To reduce the radius for right -turns for vehicles southbound from I -35E to westbound on Diffley. o To provide a signal, if desired by the County, for the proposed left -turn access into the center. The signal would be time coordinated with the signal at the I -35E west ramps and Diffley Road. o To pay for the roadway changes and the signal -if required by the County. BRW's view of the advantages and disadvantages of the proposal are: o The break in the median will improve the access to the shopping center; it will allow vehicles to/from the west to access and egress the center at the same location. This situation will assist in providing safe and efficient traffic flow. o The break in the median will reduce the potential for "U-turns" at the intersection of the I -35E west ramps and Diffley Road for vehicles trying to access the center from the west that did not turn at Blackhawk Road. o The signal will require less green time for vehicles to cross Diffley Road than either the Blackhawk Road signal or a signal at the I -35E ramps; and therefore not be a capacity restraint on Diffley Road. Dale Runkle September 1, 1988 Page 3 o Reduce the number of left -turns at the intersection of Blackhawk Road and Diffley. o The geometric improvement at the I -35E southbound off -ramp and Diffley Road for the right -turn will improve traffic operations. o The signal will make the weaving on Diffley Road between I -35E and Blackhawk Drive more difficult than without a signal. o The introduction of a break in the median will increase the probability of traffic operational problems, as any access would. The break in the median and signal would improve the access to the shopping center, reduce potential operational problems on Diffley because of the "U-turns" trying to access the center, but result in an additional intersection along Diffley Road. Significant traffic operational and/or safety problems are not expected to occur because of the median break; the distance between the I -35E off -ramp and the proposed median break 1s over 400 feet and the distance to Blackhawk Road is approximately 600 feet. Sincerely, BENNETT-RINGROSE-WOLSFELD-JARVIS-GARDNER, INC. ij l E�� Ri and P. Wolsfeld, Principal RPW/smb cc: Thomas Hedges Luther Stalland File: 46-8811 Agenda Information Memo September 6, 1988, City Council Meeting NEW°BUSINESS ORDINANCE AMENDMENT TO CHAPTER 4 CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY A. Ordinance Amending City Code, Chapter 4 to Eliminate the "Certificate of Survey" Requirement for Expansion of an Existing Structure So Long as the Expansion Does Not Extend Onto New Property --During the spring of 1988, Chapter 4 of the City Code was amended that required a certificate of survey for the expansion of any existing residential structure within the community. After the ordinance was adopted and after additional review by the City staff, it was determined that the ordinance is far too restrictive and did not address the concerns originally expressed by the Protective Inspections Department. At the last City Council meeting, the annual ordinance codification was updated and the City Attorney's office was directed to prepare modifications to Chapter 4 regarding a change in the certificate of survey requirement. Enclosed on pages 130 through (3/ is a copy of the new ordinance. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny an ordinance entitled "Construction Licensing Permits and Regulation, Including Signs, Excavations and Mobile Home Parks" by requirements for a Surveyor's Certificate for new construction and by adopting by reference Eagan City Code, Chapter 1 and Section 4.99. ORDINANCE NO. 57, 2ND SERIES AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EAGAN, MINNESOTA, AMENDING EAGAN CITY CODE, CHAPTER 4, ENTITLED "CONSTRUCTION LICENSING, PERMITS AND REGULATION, INCLUDING SIGNS, EXCAVATIONS AND MOBILE HOME PARKS" BY REQUIREMENTS FOR A SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE FOR NEW CONSTRUCTION AND, BY ADOPTING, BY REFERENCE, EAGAN CITY CODE CHAPTER 1 AND SECTION 4.99. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EAGAN DOES ORDAIN: aection 1. Eagan Code Chapter 4.03 is hereby amended to read: SEC. 4.03. BUILDING PERMITS REQUIRED. It is unlawful for any person to erect, construct, enlarge, alter, repair, move, improve, remove, convert, or demolish any building or structure, or any part or portion thereof, including, but not limited to, the plumbing, electrical, ventilating, hearing or air conditioning systems therein, or cause the same to be done, without first obtaining a separate building or mechanical permit for each such building, structure or mechanical components from the City. A certjficate of Survey from a xegi,stered land surveyor is re -d Luctioruwherein land is to be occupied by a structure. The expans_on, of an existing structure does not require a Certificate of Survey so long as_ the expansion does Rot oa _.ad vntQ�eL property, Section 2. Eagan City Code Chapter 1, entitle° General Provisions ano Definitions applicable to the entire City Code including "Penalty for Violation" and Section 4.99 entitled "Violation, a Misdemeanor" are hereby adopted in their entirity, by reference, as though repeated verbatim. aection 3. Effective Date. This ordinance shall take effect upon its adoption and publication according to law. ATTEST: CITY CF EAGAN CITY COUNCIL By: By: Its: Clerk Its: Mayor Date Ordinance Adopted: Date Ordinance Published in Legal Newspaper: Agenda Information Memo September 6, 1988, City Council Meeting EXTENSION OF FINAL PLAT/OAK CLIFF POND B. Extension of Final Plat Approval for Oak Cliff Pond --The City has received a request by the Brutger Companies for a one (1) year extension to apply for the final plat approval of Oak Cliff Pond 2nd Addition. The preliminary plat was approved August 18, 1987. Enclosed on page �j�J is a copy of a letter sent to Mayor Ellison by Brutger Company requesting the one year extension. The preliminary plat for Oak Cliff Pond 2nd Addition was originally approved at the August 18, 1987 meeting. SPECIAL NOTE: This item is to be continued indefinitely to allow all departments an opportunity to review the preliminary plat of record. Once that review is completed, the item will be rescheduled as an action item at a future City Council meeting. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To continue indefinitely the extension of the preliminary plat for Oak Cliff Pond 2nd Addition to allow for staff review. )°03MTUMM gD2ZSE3.G ml@• ONE SUNWOOD DRIVE • BOX 399 • ST. CLOUD, MINNESOTA 56302 • TEL. 612/252-6262 August 17, 1938 :iayor Victor Ellison City of Eagan 3330 Pilot Knob Road P.O. Box 21199 Eagan, iinnesota 55121 RE: OAK CLIFF POND 2nd Addition Preliminary Plat Dear layor Ellison: Brutger Companies would like to request a one year extension to apply for final plat approval. Due to the late start and the projection of sales, we are requesting the extension for the 2nd addition at Oak Cliff Pond. Thank you for your consideration! Sincerely, BRUTGER CO,IPANIES, INC. Roger H. Olson Real Estate Development Office RHO/cic �33 Agenda Information Memo September 6, 1988, City Council Meeting CURBSIDE RECYCLING PROGRAM C. Implementation of Curbside Recycling Program --The Solid Waste Abatement Commission, staffed by Administrative Assistant Jon Hohenstein, has been meeting on a regular basis to explore, review, research and consider a curbside recycling program for the City of Eagan. At its meeting of August 23, 1988, the Solid Waste Abatement Commission recommended that the City Council adopt a modified open hauling approach to implementing the curbside recycling program. It is the recommendation of the Solid Waste Abatement Commission that the City Council accept the modified open hauling alternative for implementation of curbside recycling prior to April 1, 1989. For additional information regarding that Commission's recommendation, refer to the attached memos from Administrative Assistant Hohenstein, enclosed on pages 1.735 through t (..( Q ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To consider adoption of the recommendation of the Solid Waste Abatement Commission to accept the modified open hauling alternative for implementation of curbside recycling prior to April 1, 1989. MEMO TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT HOHENSTEIN AUGUST 30, 1988 CURBSIDE RECYCLING IMPLEMENTATION RECOMMENDATION BY SOLID WASTE ABATEMENT COMMISSION INTRODUCTION At its meeting of August 23, 1988, the Solid Waste Abatement Commission recommended that the City Council adopt a modified open hauling approach to implementing curbside recycling in the immediate future. While this alternative does not precisely coincide with previous Council direction, the Commission is recommending this alternative for several reasons including the fact that it is one of the few that can be implemented by April 1, 1989 - the County deadline for 100% capital funding. ALTERNATIVES In an effort to implement the Council's direction concerning refuse collection and curbside recycling, the Solid Waste Abatement Commission met in regular sessions and in special sessions with licensed haulers to discuss the possibility of implementing a partially organized system. Partial organization presents several immediate barriers to implementation which are detailed below. As a result, the Commission also brought forward two additional alternatives for review. All three of the basic models have been outlined as follows: 1. Partial Organization - At a special meeting held on March 9, 1988, the City Council indicated a preference for a system which would retain certain aspects of open competition and require hauler management of waste, recycleables and yard waste, while reducing the number of trucks on City streets. The suggested model consisted of: a. Creation of four to six residential hauling districts to be bid among private haulers, the lowest two bidders being able to serve the district. b. Require same day, weekly collection of rubbish, recyclables and yard waste. c. Retain a direct billing relationship between the hauler and the customer to maintain accountability and financial incentives to recycle. d. Require a volume -based fee structure to reward homeowners generating less waste. 2. Plymouth Model - The City of Plymouth uses a system which allows prompt implementation because it continues the use of open hauling for waste and yard waste, but bids recycling services as a separate contract for all residents. This system consists of: a. Same day collection of recyclables for all Eagan residents or within optional districts of the City. b. Requirement of volume -based fees. c. Optional creation of daily residential hauling districts. d. Optional direct or hauler billing for recycling services. e. Reconsideration of organization at set intervals depending upon performance and citizen response. 3. Modified Open Hauling - A system suggested by certain members of the hauling community is to require recycling implementation of haulers as a condition of their license. The model would consist of: a. Formation of daily residential hauling districts. b. Requirement of same day, weekly collection of rubbish, recycleables and yard waste within such districts. c. Requirement of volume -based fees to encourage waste reduction. d. Optional cap of residential hauling licenses. e. Reconsideration of organization at set intervals depending upon performance and citizen response. ANALYSIS The positive and negative aspects of each alternative were considered by the Commission. A summary of their analysis follows. Funding An immediate issue involves funding assistance for recycling implementation. Dakota County has committed substantial resources to cities for this purpose with declining benefits depending upon the timeframe of implementation. If a curbside recycling program is in place by April 1, 1989, the City will be entitled to 100% of capital funding up to $320,000. Programs begun after that date entitle a city to 50% of capital up to $160,000. The 1989 Budget Proposal assumes the 100% funding alternative. Later implementation would require a contingency of an additional $160,000 in the 1989 budget. In addition, subsequent years' fundings depend upon a city's recycling performance in the previous year. Since the 1989 goal of recycling 9% of the residential waste stream is very aggressive, programs started later in the year will find it virtually impossible to reach the targets. Finally, if a City fails to implement a program by 1990, the County will consider intervening and implementing a program of its own. The costs of such a program would be billed to the city for implementation and would not be eligible for County funding support. Vb(0 Legal Issues While these factors encourage prompt implementation, possible legal action by BFI, a national hauling firm, will likely prevent consideration of most organized alternatives. In an attempt to avoid monolpoly situations, many cities have attempted to negotiate with all of their licensed haulers or form consortiums of haulers to improve hauling efficiency and implement recycling mandates. BFI has sued to enjoin such negotiations until a court determines that firms participating in talks are protected from antitrust litigation by the state's antitrust immunity. With the inevitable appeals a decision is unlikely in time to allow 1989 implementation of more organized alternatives. Comparison In this light, the considered alternatives are outlined below. As indicated above, Partial Organization is intended to combine the benefits of organization with certain market forces while requiring recycling services of haulers. Among the benefits of organization are improved efficiencies and lower costs, reduced street and safety impacts, required standard levels of service for all residents and ease of recycling implementation. While it has many benefits for the City in concept, Partial Organization presents certain implementation problems at this time. 1. Definition of Districts - It will be very difficult and time consuming to define districts which will be uniform in the number of accounts and route distances in a large evolving City like Eagan. Therefore, bids for different districts may vary widely and districts would require constant modification. In addition, the restrictions which the City may place on districts could severly impact the number of accounts certain large haulers currently serve. 2. Bid Issues - In order for the competitive bid process to be effective, the City would have to require that haulers not exceed their bid for a particular district. This will likely lead to the low bidder receiving a majority of the district's accounts, thus undermining the competition the system was intended to preserve. In short, cost competition is eliminated. 3. Negotiations with Haulers - At the present time, it is unclear whether haulers may meet with cities to negotiate routes and rates under federal antitrust standards. While such negotiations could answer the district and bid problems above, the likelihood of injunction by BFI is substantial. The Plymouth Model came about as a result of the City of Plymouth's attempt to meet Hennepin County's recycling mandates. The City developed a proposal to organize all hauling. At a public hearing on the issue, residents vocally opposed the �3� proposal because of a desire to retain free choice among haulers. As a result, the City bid recycling on a separate basis. Until the issue is similarly heard in Eagan, resident response will riot be known. The prinicipal benefit of this alternative is its relative ease of implementation. The state and county mandates relate Only to recycling. This alternative responds directly to that Mandate and goes no further. Its principal deficiency iS that it requires a direct contractual payment on a per ton or per household basis. This would most likely be passed on by the City to the homeowner with little direct relationship to the volume of waste produced or reduced because it removes the waste hauler from the recycling loop. It also limits the materials likely to be recycled to those required by the contract. Modified Open Hauling allows prompt implementation because all haulers who wish to serve the City will become :«ot ted promoters of the system. The system requires little immed;a=te dislocation of the industry. It also provides the Most diredt link between the entrepreneur's desire to avoid costs of tipping and innovation in the area of recycling. The system is adaptable to the use of daily districts will tend to reduce the number of firms hauling in particular neighborhoods. Firns will likely consolidate in areas where their accounts conce=mntrAte and drop out of daily districts where they have few accounts or are less competitive. The principal deficiency of the system is that it does not guarantee a reduction in the number of trucks dul-pliaat.;routes on City streets. Additional requirements for sep‘atratsirard waste and recyclable collection will add vehicles to the TS. If consolidation does not reduce traffic by a similtar rimer, the net effect will be an increased and concent2att impact. Further, the costs of duplication will continue to be 4Orn by the homeowner. CONCLUSION Despite the foreseeable deficiencies, the Solid Wasta . statement Commission recommends that the City Council accept -.1be modified Open Hauling alternative for implementation of curbs-±& cycling prior to April 1, 1989. It not only allows the c: of the maximum possible funding assistance, but also allow: industry an opportunity to innovate and respond to the. recyc. A Mandate. Because the City would not be implementing direct recycling, however, it would also be appropri& specific period of review at which public com_- received and alternatives might ---be considered.. were to occur twelve to twonty-four months after : it is possible that the BFI _litigation: would be co consideration of alternatives wt,a.ch currently are Erol over sa set a mould be review -.:: ntation, allowing CONSIDERATION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL It is requested that the City Council approve, modify or deny the SWAC recommendation of curbside recycling implementation through a modification of the open hauling system and direct staff to work with the Commission and haulers to prepare ordinance amendments and license restrictions to meet the April 1, 1989 target date; such system to be reviewed no later than twenty-four months after implementation to consider its effectiveness and impacts. If you have any questions concerning this item, please let me know. Ac4pinistrative Assistant \3� MEMO TO: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES DATE: SEPTEMBER 2, 1988 SUBJECT: SWAC/HAULER INFORMATIONAL MEETING - AUGUST 31, 1988 This memo provides a brief background on the informational meeting held Wednesday evening, August 31, 1988 for licensed haulers to review details of the Solid Waste Abatement Commission recommendation for curbside recycling implementation through hauler license restrictions. The haulers present generally understand that state and county mandates require cities to make waste management decisions they might not otherwise make. They also generally support modified open hauling as the alternative with the least impact on the industry. They expressed a reservation, however, with respect to the formation of daily hauling districts. It was stated that this may tend to have the greatest impact on small haulers due to the dispersion of their accounts throughout the community. It was also stated that some confusion may result for drivers used to being the only service on a given street on a given day. Staff informed the group of the benefits same day collection has for recycling participation and the peer pressure associated with containers being present on the curb on a particular day. It also reduces the number of days that waste is on the curb in neighborhoods. Staff agreed to pass this concern on to the Council because of the level of concern raised by the haulers. If you have any questions about this additional information, please let me know. inistrative Assistant Agenda Information Memo September 6, 1988, City Council Meeting SPECIAL PERMIT/TEMPORARY ON-SITE ADVERTISING SIGN TOWNHOMES OF HILLANDALE D. Special Permit for Townhomes of Hillandale/Steve Ramsey for Temporary On -Site Advertising Sign --The City has received application for a special permit for a temporary advertising sign in the Townhomes of Hillandale requesting a 96 square foot sign, 12' x 8', approximately 16 feet in height. For a copy of t e application and attachments, refer to pages NJ, through NS . ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the special permit for a temporary advertising sign for the Townhomes of Hillandale as presented. iii CITY OF EAGAN SUBJECT: SPECIAL PERMIT - TEMP. ADVERTISING SIGN APPLICANT: TOWNHOMES OF HILLANDALE LOCATION: SE 1/4 OF SECT. 20, HILLANDALE 2ND ADD. EXISTING ZONING: R-4 (MULTIPLE) DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: SEPTEMBER 6, 1988 DATE OF REPORT: AUGUST 31, 1988 REPORTED BY: PLANNING DEPARTMENT APPLICATION SUMMARY: An application has been submitted requesting a temporary advertising sign for the Townhomes of Hillandale. The sign would be 12' x 8' (96 sq. ft.) and have an approximate height of 16'. The sign would be located near the eastern property line between Blocks 8 and 10, Hillandale 2nd Addition. The sign will face I -35E. TOWNHOMES OF HILLANDALE CONDITIONS: If approved, the special permit shall be subject to the following conditions: 1. A one time fee of $2.50 per sq. ft. shall be paid. 2. A11 other applicable City Ordinances shall be adhered to. MAF L.12 -7f5- riAr Sinn 'ram 1' 111111Hiiii '4 HILLANDAL PtRIDOT PATH PARK R-4 79\7 : >'Ii _7 b 4;0 ky I SAM Fff THOMA R-2 HER,' U !TY p-13 v / S ��✓ „4 / 7-1.7/ -jib 4. / ! /* /L :/ �/ \i' t�/`� �.�L v^f //4-/- /9-1-12.r.• / Y L.--. /999ZrAI�a,=. l_ !/ ? . /�'/l�✓�.'� T.3 Az ..Gs // %�/J Lt ry �c2 iy •••". HILLANDALE VIGI►.11TY NAY SEGZOTye.27, RBE. ZS 60 30 0 60 MOSCALE 120 SCALE IN FEET S89'20'S4"E 311.67 ADORE 5 5 MA P ADDIT1C 5bQ`57'f'-") 4135.65 �'. 50 O 00 OUTLOT A 589" 30'32-4,-) /54.27 ti Sia /g 35, / 45 Ngb0O OJ 47'1 O • ` N 3tiz42o 4.O i h 57035 2900 0102223E )135-41314i 25:.G 25.:..: 40 '500 4123 Z5.00 5°0 2900 6 2 41147 4117 Z900 2500 Z500 2520 2500 2900 ZS ;f4.9is o,0 3!, ZS00 3c4°5? T ° f5g` o 8 c 25.00O A7d 25°. �4, 'Soo S1iH•Io 9V E \ 111) 89•t0'54E 1 589 54"E Q N„ 7900 2...—,4) -", L\: ?500 25ro 4121 4133 4129 4(25 o c 2 2,2 3° °,4� `0• 0 4090 •.- 7900 . h•� 185. 8 5*59. 20' S4"E L9� 10 CiS N r _ r••. • ••. i. ' ... ._. .=i �.• i �h V Mq` ti• \x./2.00 550.09'2¢"E LDRAINAGE AND UTIL ALL OF LOT 1, BLOCK OF THIS PLAT. Agenda Information Memo September 6, 1988, City Council Meeting SPECIAL PERMIT/TEMPORARY SIGN BURNSVILLE LUMBER COMPANY E. Special Permit for Burnsville Lumber Company for a Temporary Marketing Sign for Whispering Woods --A special permit application was applied for by Burnsville Lumber Company to construct a temporary advertising sign for the Whispering Woods Development located off-site at the southwest corner of Slater Road and Cliff Road. For a copy of the Planning Department report, refer to pages 01/7 through /S(). ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the special permit for a temporary advertising sign for Burnsville Lumber Company as presented. CITY OF EAGAN SUBJECT: SPECIAL PERMIT - TEMP. ADVERTISING SIGN APPLICANT: BURNSVILLE LUMBER CO LOCATION: NW 1/4 OF SECT. 31 ON THE SW CORNER OF CLIFF RD & SLATER RD EXISTING ZONING: DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: DATE OF REPORT: REPORTED BY: APPLICATION SUMMARY: R-1 (SINGLE FAMILY) SEPTEMBER 6, 1988 AUGUST 31, 1988 PLANNING DEPARTMENT An application has been submitted requesting a temporary advertising sign for the Whispering Woods Development. The sign should be 4' x 4' (16 sq. ft.) and have an approximate height of 7'. The sign will be located off-site and will be used to indicate the direction to the applicant's development site. BURNSVILLE LUMBER CO. CONDITIONS: If approved, the Special Permit shall be subject to the following conditions: 1. A one time fee of $2.50 per sq. ft. shall be paid. 2. The sign shall be no more than 4' x 4' and may erected and maintained between April 1 and November 3. The sign may be only erected and maintained within mile radius of the unidentified development. only be 1, 1988. a one-half 4. All other applicable City Ordinances shall be adhered to. (----1( - 1-1 VACANT WHISPERING WOODS SIGN !g1 SLATER ROAD STANDARD OIL STATION • A P T's O A PT's X50 Agenda Information Memo September 6, 1988, City Council Meeting SPECIAL PERMIT/TEMPORARY ADVERTISING SIGN SIENNA CORPORATION F. Special Permit for a Temporary Advertising Sign for Sienna Corporation --The Sienna Corporation has requested a special permit to allow an existing sign to remain located in Outlot H, advertising model homes in the Eagan Hills Farms development. The sign is located at the intersection of Bridle Ridge Road and Wescott Road. For additional information on the item, refer to the Plannin Department report, a copy is enclosed on pages /,,5. through ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the special permit for Sienna Corporation to allow their existing sign to remain at Outlot H, Bridle Ridge Addition. rs ( CITY OF EAGAN SUBJECT: SPECIAL PERMIT APPLICANT: SIENNA CORP LOCATION: EXISTING ZONING: DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: DATE OF REPORT: REPORTED BY: COMMENTS: Application Corporation 48 sq. ft. Eagan Hills OUTLOT H, BRIDLE RIDGE ADD. PD, R-1 (PLANNED DEVEL. SINGLE FAMILY) SEPTEMBER 6, 1988 AUGUST 30, 1988 PLANNING DEPARTMENT for a Special Permit has been submitted by Sienna to allow their existing sign to remain. The sign is and is 10' in height, advertising model homes in the Farm Development. SIENNA CORPORATION CONDITIONS: If approved, the Special following conditions: Permit shall be subject to the 1. A $2.50/sq. ft. fee be paid to the City. 2. This sign shall be removed one year from date of City Council approval. 3. This sign shall meet all Code requirements. l sz 1 4 St- ESCO -.2*" 2 5‘ 4 YYt 7F% S •X : T i 1'S">Y•C9 IQ issi LJ$J_Gt_ _+ 14, _4.2 18 N � 1' • W •z Ld a 05 Z O cc 1 a o J.> 2 m w oNt. V K � W ' i m d • • 1 r • - I ' • I •:i �I} '•S �� iI r• .I11 LII1 y1 ,= ' w • !• •a ! •n�' ��il •i Ol��I .. 'L.M_ JIL.. 11 iSt _• — . sc'zcy cc ¢wJ Jl4 • • N r S1no • 1B 1 171 nuHL 11 S) e m.L 01e J0 ',11t113Q b0d ;;*4: ImW SI 1 -/HS .L 40 .9 1331-iS 33$7.7—• .O 9 6YZ 3, D U;. S A.A.1 °' o a Cv1-` 3.p► yv.'S Agenda Information Memo September 6, 1988, City Council Meeting SPECIAL PERMIT/TEMPORARY ADVERTISING SIGN SIENNA CORPORATION G. Special Permit for a Temporary Advertising Sign for Sienna Corporation --An application for a special permit was submitted by Sienna Corporation for Outlot J to allow their existing sign to remain located at the intersection of Elrene Road and Wescott Road. For additional information on the proposed temporary sign, refer to the Planning Department report, a copy is enclosed on pages /3-6, through ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the special permit for Sienna Corporation to allow an existing sign to remain on Outlot J, Bridle Ridge Addition. CITY OF EAGAN SUBJECT: SPECIAL PERMIT APPLICANT: SIENNA CORP LOCATION: OUTLOT J, BRIDLE RIDGE ADD. EXISTING ZONING: PD, R-1 (PLANNED DEVEL. SINGLE FAMILY) DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: SEPTEMBER 6, 1988 DATE OF REPORT: AUGUST 30, 1988 REPORTED BY: PLANNING DEPARTMENT COMMENTS: Application for a Special Permit has been submitted by Sienna Corporation to allow their existing sign to remain. The sign is 48 sq. ft. and is 10' in height, advertising model homes in the Eagan Hills Farm Development. SIENNA CORPORATION CONDITIONS: If approved, the Special Permit shall be subject to the following conditions: 1. A $2.50/sq. ft. fee be paid to the City. 2. This sign shall be removed one year from date of City Council approval. 3. This sign shall meet all Code requirements. r 297.59 '• • ?96 6 5 S89'593g1W CRAIN a UTILITY 1 EASEMENT cc LLJ (I) r — — w 8 W. 1/4 SEC. 2 1ET'%P. oni-Stte iczt-i ofq WESCOTT OUTL0T, ROAD 442.17 ,4* noLI•Situf c----------711: .37-7 471 6 ;//„? 5 . ') 1;:---17.)'' ''')61'' i. : ••• 4.• A?. ,z „D.. • • -,-., "... Lis -0.7.27.3; r,--- Ta.,,, ,Air,, % ..- a*0.,,•,.. ,,,, ›ps 5r4.2.4. ali.81.. E ----,---- 1:—. ' 9 I.: Pi 80•Pa•27•It ..---- --- 1,..72 --- 11047. WI 1 12 414%12,27. E , . ..: —104....: • lE25 T4 I NES 1 12 2 WESCOTT WAYS/LYE— — I OUT—‘'LO ••••• / 20 '04,,,..\\ ••-i-ik :74 11 I I I. 23 / 211 41 22 . , • • 1:4 P:1;1 .`" ••23.4, a, 14 I c,..,'".. ... -J, 7 ----\ t. 1.....-- , • i, . , 0 v., 18 .; d .s. :.,11V /1 ,t 19 1. \ 17 -) . 7-'.:' d ..i,l, Lt,..44"f~nr-._•• - 4, W ,....iy• ... 1 ... 0.4' i...i. r-..--;.---,. 1 . :_ - .......-- rf.-\ o. 0.......... ..... i 0. ia 00 I /6 I; \ t '''2 15• \ \t \ 20 .: i.:• V°• 111? -':101. sNt". i — ‘"%t••••;;O'" • -• - % .. . :::::: • or: _ E._ ,--, ,r. " .4' .7? • ,:. - Agittirrt;2,} ,.. 7. 1 T.& ,-.." e• 064 _- o .0 a olv4GE , rl Nr< 4"771412wi-1, 90,30 ,‘ ,540‘ • tV. 8 9 -91LP, , 3 ta, •,., R0,4 0 0 /5.3.1.)1.• Agenda Information Memo September 6, 1988, City Council Meeting WAIVER OF PLAT/B.H. GRACE CORPORATION H. Waiver of Plat for B.H. Grace Corporation,Duplex Lot Split to Allow Individual Ownership --The B.H. Grace Corporation is requesting a waiver of plat to allow individual ownership of a duplex on Lot 2, Block 1, Jean Addition. For a copy of the Planning Department report, refer to pages CDO through ((D( . ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the waiver of plat for B.H. Grace Corporation as presented. /S9 CITY OF EAGAN SUBJECT: WAIVER OF PLAT APPLICANT: B.H. GRACE CORP LOCATION: L 2, B 1, JEAN ADDITION 2086/2088 KINGS RD EXISTING ZONING: R-2 (DUPLEX) DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: SEPTEMBER 6, 1988 DATE OF REPORT: AUGUST 16, 1988 REPORTED BY: PLANNING DEPARTMENT APPLICATION SUMMARY: An application has been submitted by B.H. Grace Corporation requesting a Waiver of Plat for Lot 2, Block 1, Jean Addition, to allow individual ownership. The duplex, under construction, meets setback requirements and separate utilities are provided for the duplex. If approved, the Waiver of Plat shall meet all Code requirements. L0 L�GA'� lord Most easterly corner of Lot2, Block 1 Sun'cqor's Certificate 4516 SURVEY FOR: B .11. Grace DESCRIBED AS: Lot 2, Block 1, JEAN ADDITION, City of Eagan, % 10 Dakota County, Minnesota and reserving easements of record. 6• 140 UI Q E5 / I Nb 1 .. / 01 a o*/ o (`/ ,s. 7 Parcel A r / N cv co co `ev 3 Las9 5.5 Q rte'`b/ / * o 1 N "°c 40 I 1 ��;:- 1 ac t..,11) 1 • Gar 2.4 5.3. 3 39/'0S"e 0 ko o° N 1 (11^ 99J.0 .. u -- Most westerly Corner of Lot 2, Block, 1 PROPOSED ELEVATIONS c,.+ Top of Foundation ■ 9 ea.} Garage Floor • 99s.o Basement Floor . 9 51.2 Approx. Sewer Service Elev. ■ Proposed Elevation. s O Existing • Elevations • Drainage Directions • -► Donates Offset Stoke i 0 Parcel B 29. 82 N3B•47•//•ly SCALE: 1 -Inch a 30 Fest • I MIN. SETBACK REOIREMENTSt 10 1 Front House Wee — Rear — Garage Side • — Agenda Information Memo September 6, 1988, City Council Meeting VARIANCE/NEW HORIZON HOMES I. Variance for New Horizon Homes Inc., for a 2.33 Foot Variance to the Front Yard Setback --New Horizon Homes has submitted an application requesting a 2.33 foot variance to the minimum 30' required setback from public right-of-way for Lots 14 and 15, Block 2, Thomas Lake Heights. For background regarding the request for a variance, refer to the Planning Dep artment report, a copy is enclosed on pages LC03 through 1 CDS ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the variance for a 2.33 foot setback where a minimum of 30' is required from public right-of-way. CITY OF EAGAN SUBJECT: VARIANCE APPLICANT: NEW HORIZON HOMES LOCATION: LOTS 14 & 17, BLOCK 2, THOMAS LK. HTS. EXISTING ZONING: PD, R-2 (PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DOUBLE) DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: SEPTEMBER 6, 1988 DATE OF REPORT: AUGUST 31, 1988 REPORTED BY: PLANNING DEPARTMENT APPLICATION SUMMARY: An application has been submitted by New Horizon Homes requesting 2.33' variance to the minimum 30' required setback from public right-of-way. COMMENTS: The purpose of this variance is to allow New Horizon Homes to construct two 1,075 sq. ft. homes on Lots 14 & 17, Block 2, Thomas Lake Heights. The encroachment of 2.33' will affect the 30' minimum setback requirement along Clemson Drive. The homes will meet all other setback requirements and will not encroach any drainage and utility easements. The applicant is presently purchasing the above mentioned lots which have stood vacant for a number of years. The variance is being requested so New Horizon Homes, Inc. may build homes that are similar in size and design to the already existing homes located in Thomas Lake Heights. If approved, this variance shall be subject to all applicable code requirements. 163 1-41-12 6 1'1A H 1'7 SI D -II _ iIQ-Itl'�5I, �i1, Vi Vii. rnW -Al 704 '`j• tcf' 1471%.-37 S i 4673 O 0 X000.0 (000.0) ‘-N (915.0 ¢3.00 1\ I0 (rZS. 43. oa 22.33 of r% 22.33 ` 2 \ \ 2.00 N ) "m `�\\ /I4....7\ \\ \P oho. .o -, \ N 22.0 M`, �; Agenda Information Memo September 6, 1988, City Council Meeting WAIVER OF PLAT/SPLIT LOTS EAGANDALE CENTER J. Waiver of Plat for Opus Corporation to Split Lots 14 and 16, Block 7, Eagandale Center Industrial Park and Combine into Two Lots Consisting of 7.2 Acres and a Conditional Use Permit for Outside Storage and Pylon Sign --A public hearing was held by the Advisory Planning Commission at their August 30, 1988 meeting to consider a waiver of plat in order to split Lots 14 and 16, Block 7 of the Eagandale Center Industrial Park and combine them into two (2) lots consisting of 7.2 acres and a conditional use permit for outside storage and a pylon sign located along West Service Road in the east half of Section 3. The APC is recommending approval of both applications to the City Council. For a copy of the Planning and Engineering Department reports for the waiver of plat and conditional use permit, refer to pages /LT_ through For a copy of the Planning Commission action on this item, refer to page(s) ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the waiver of plat in order to split Lots 14 and 16, Block 7 of the Eagandale Center Industrial Park and combine into two lots totalling 7.2 acres and a conditional use permit to allow outside storage and a pylon sign on the southern parcel A. 16 CITY OF EAGAN SUBJECT: WAIVER OF PLAT, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT APPLICANT: OPUS CORPORATION LOCATION: E 1/2, SECTION 3 EXISTING ZONING: LI (LIGHT INDUSTRIAL) DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: AUGUST 23, 1988 DATE OF REPORT: AUGUST 16, 1988 REPORTED BY: PLANNING & ENGINEERING DEPARTMENTS APPLICATION SUMMARY Separate applications have been submitted requesting a Waiver of Plat in order to split Lots 14 and 16, Block 7 of the Eagandale Industrial Park and combine them into two lots totaling 7.2 acres located along West Service Road and Eagan Industrial Roadr and a Conditional Use Permit to allow outside storage and a pylon sign on the southern Parcel 'A'. That area containing 4.1 acres will be developed immediately for a General Electric office/warehouse facility. Parcel 'B' (3.3 acres) to the north will be marketed as a buildable site. SITE PLAN These lots are separated from others to the west by a 25' railroad spur easement. Georgia Pacific Lumber Company is located along the south side of Eagan Industrial Road. The site is relatively flat grassland perched above Hwy. 35-E and it is doubtful much of the buildings will be visable from that area. The 7,000 square ft. office will be constructed of brick with a dryvit (stucco like) fascia. The 30,644 square ft. two story warehouse will be painted precast concrete panels. Additional warehouse expansion area (14,742 square ft.) has been provided to the north. The total lot coverage, including the expansion area, is 29% in a 35% district. The office area alone requires 37 ten foot wide parking stalls and 63 have been provided - allowing 26 for the warehouse area. Staff expects this amount to be more than adequate. All building and parking setbacks meet code requirements. The yard storage area containing 9,950 square ft. on the west side of the building is fenced and code requires that this area must be paved with curbing. Detailed pylon plans have not been finalized, however they must stay at or under the 125 square ft. per side. Opus will not allow any signs above 25' in the industrial park on land they develop. A Landscape Plan was submitted that works well conceptually. ,it is consistent with other Opus developed projects. If the grading plan can be modified slightly, it would be desirable to raise the berm near the west properly line and south of the entrance along West Service Road. This, however is not a major concern. GRADING/DRAINAGE/EROSION CONTROL: The development proposes cut and fill areas of approximately 10'+/- in the proposed ponding area to approximately 4'+/- for berming along Eagan Industrial Road and West Service Road, respectively. The proposed development is located in drainage Basin H, Subdistrict H-10, as designated in the Eagan Comprehensive Storm Sewer Plan. In an effort to improve the drainage and restrict the runoff from this site, the development is proposing a 0.25 acre feet of storage ponding area located in the southwesterly corner of the development. This ponding area receives approximately 1.8 acres of direct runoff from the roof and parking area. It is recommended that the outlet pipe for the ponding area be restricted to 0.5 cubic feet per second (cfs) outflow. It is further recommended that the remaining 3.2 acres northerly of this site also provide ponding of its water restricting its outflow to approximately 4 cfs when it develops. The development is proposing a drainage swale along the northerly side of the proposed warehouse facility. The development may want to assess the feasibility of picking up that drainage along the northerly side of the warehouse and conveying it through the proposed ponding area on the southwesterly corner. The proposed future warehouse addition would prohibit this proposed drainage swale from functioning. The proposed construction should pose no serious erosion control problems. The development will be required to submit appropriate erosion control measures which will prohibit sediment transport offsite during the building construction phases. UTILITIES: Sanitary sewer service of sufficient depth and capacity and water main service of sufficient capacity and pressure are readily available in Eagan Industrial Road and West Service Road. STREETS/ACCESS/CIRCULATION: Public street access is readily available to this site and is proposed from the southerly adjacent Eagan Industrial Road and the easterly adjacent West Service Road. The proposed entrance width from public right-of-- way shall be at least 30' wide. The development will also be responsible for constructing concrete valley gutters through the proposed intersections with the public street. EASEMENTS/RIGHTS-OF-WAY/PERMITS: Sufficient right-of-way for Eagan Industrial Road and West Service Road were dedicated with previous platting processes. The development will be responsible for providing the appropriate easement for the proposed public storm sewer along the westerly side of the development. All regulatory agency permits shall be acquired within the appropriate time frame as required by the affected agency. ASSESSMENTS: A search of City special assessment records show the property has fulfilled all of the appropriate assessments associated with previous street and utility construction. CONDITIONS: GENERAL ELECTRIC WAIVER OF PLAT 1. The development limit its storm water outflow into the City storm sewer system to 0.5 cfs. 2. The proposed entrances from public right-of-way are required to be 30 feet wide with concrete valley gutters. 3. All public streets and utilities necessary to provide service to this development shall be designed by a registered professional engineer in accordance with City codes and engineering standards and policies, and approved by staff prior to recording of Waiver. 4. A detailed grading, drainage, erosion, and sediment control plan must be prepared in accordance with current City standards and approved by staff prior to recording of Waiver. 5. If any public improvements are to be installed under a City contract, the appropriate project must be approved by Council action prior to recording of Waiver. 6. This development shall be responsible for the acquisition of all regulatory agency permits in the time frame required by the affected agency. 7. All signs shall be subject to the one time sign fee of $2.50 per square foot. n.o G i250 I \ REM irTh ti R \\N N.S\ CNIPORATE '1' AZAA , . C.4:::70.CUR(SEE •.! ; 6 G / 7. = - Apou.t • ? :HTS. 4' *; i4.•-••••• mr1.4441,• 1 i _ _./\ ) ',/ • ' - , -----4-1:-..,1 / •., ,, ,[ - 4 -.-4 r•-•-.•-•-•-•••.--. . -04-IL , • . 1 I L.....-1 -.•'.-' • . i,6 . - 1 1, '4 • .1 1 WWI r — • ','; ‘ ..----1 1 -•-• WAIVER OF PLAT SURVEY FOR 1 . 1 1 ''',11 11,•1 111 '+ 1:11'; i!1 • ii 11, 1�II''' 111 1 1,, . 3,111,:,,3 1 1 11 1 ,,_.. 1 1 1 11'' milli 1 1 1,.131 1 ,il :, !'- 1,;'11!3, ul 1 ,13,1 13111„ !ii �111 111,,1: 1 ; ;3, 1 1111 1,1111 ;,,, • ,!,111; , ),, 1.1I 1113 i '! 1 dill'iii i1301, -,,,i-3-131 i 1;1',1 1:1 1111 , 1 3 I313f 1r 1', 111111111 3 ♦ Ry ?'1 ii'lit 1'h 1i 1•1 1j !I�14 111 1'1�1if�' 11' i 1 1 11. 11 ;,3 ,'':1• 11 111 1:1� .1; - i;i 11111 i1 li; 1 1111►i1 f 1 ,, • l! j1 ,1 111111 if I 3, 11'l �1 � i1 °f ,31 1 !Eq 1, , I, 1, 1111 f` 1, 1,1331 1,; 1131,111, r I�II� 1 ! j 1 11111 ;i;1,1,1,i11 111111 ;' 1'r 13;1; ;i :11 1111111 11111111�,1f� l _ fb4t ti,0/y • 1 1s \ ?rir\ .• 1• •1•'•••• • 1I•1\•' • 0 • / \11 43' I � � 3 6 C C SAI•61 .811. pAl .,... mENtRAL ELECTRIC SUPPLY CO. OFFICE / WAREHOUSE EAGAN, MINNESOTA SITE PLAN 1 OPUS CORPORATION ,LM • OI,IIOYl NI • 1: MON MO p A3 GENERAL ELECTRIC SUPPLY CO. OFFICE / WAREHOUSE r.„ EAGAN. N. ELEVATIONS 11••••••In• OPUS CORPORATION StLMOS • bUUUMS • Wit LIARS a* a au Ma las a Wawa Wawa WY ea+woi.tlM ion i • • O Pftim .31111104111 reit** '37WilSW �..- LMASCAPE PLAM �— --4.0 . V .... ot.rw VOIM OPUS COMOAATION YIMiS • =nR10 Den • M10/ mit mn o.� rrw i•••••• arrow OIENERAL BICITIC SPRY Ca 1/6410111101111110111 GRALIINCI N� UT1ITY PLAN C.Nor.1.11,v .410.0•71.4 ) OPUS CORPORATION • •1•NIRC fiv•t;•,, WAIVER 0' PLAT — OPUS CORPORATION Chairman Pawlenty opened the next public hearing regarding the application for a Waiver oz Plat in order to split Lots 14 and 16, Block 7, of the Eagandale Center Industrial !Park ana combine them into two lots consisting or 7.2 acres and a conditional use permit tor outside storage and a pylon sign located along west service road in tne east halt of Section 3. Assistant City Planner Jim Sturm stated separate applications has been submitted requesting a Waiver of Plat in order to develop 4.1 acres for a general electric office/warehouse facility. Parcel B (3.3 acres to the north) would be marketed as a billable site. Mr. Sturm further stated that the lots were separated from others to tne west by a railroad spur easement. Ile describea the site as relatively flat grassland perched above Highway 35E ana that it was doubtful that the buildings would be visible from that area. He ae:cribec the orrice construction, and the size she warehouse expansion area. The parking requirements had been met and staff expects the amount to be more than adequate for parking. All building and parking setbacks meet Code requirements and the yard storage area on the west sine; of the building was 'fenced and that Cone requires that this area must be paved with curbing. Mr. Sturm further stated that pylon plans had not been tinalized but that Opus was willing to meet the City Code requirements. A lanuscape plan was submitted that works well conceptually. It is consistent with other Opus developed projects. Bob Worthington from Opus Corporation (developer) passed out a brochure and explained the site plan. He stated that this development would add a needed service to the industrial park. He stated that Opus was in concurrence with the stafr report and he also gave a brief explanation of the exterior design of the building. There was no public comment. Member Voracek asked what type of storage the use would be for. The developer stated that it would be for electrical supply materials such as pipes, conduits, some transformers, etc. Member Graves asked it the area would be fenced. The developer said yes and that it would not be visible from the freeway. Chairman Pawlenty asked what king of fence would be used. The developer stated that a chainlink fence six feet to eight feet in height. Chairman Pawlenty wanted to know if the fenced area would be unsightly. The developer stateu because tne location is out of sight and by a railroad track, it woulo not be a sight problem. !Member Grave. • cc, .khOW it the drainage issue has been addressed. Assistant City Engineer Mike Foertsch stated that the applicant was made aware that the expansion would cut off some existing drainage and that this should be nandled. The developer said it was no longer an issue because they were extending the storm sewer out to the area. Mr. Sturm stated that there would be one more condition awed to the 7 listen conditions, condition 8 aealing with combining portions of land into one lot. Voracek moved, Miller seconded, a motion to (close the public rearing and to) approve a Waiver of Plat in order to split Lots 14 and 16, Block.7 of the Eagandale Center Industrial Park and combine tnem into two lots consisting of 7.2 acres and a conditional use permit for outside storage and a pylon sign locatea along west service road in the east half of Section 3, subject to the following conditions: 1. Tne development limit its storm water outflow into the City storm sewer to 0.5 cfs. 2. The proposed entrances from public right-of-way are required to be 30 feet wide with concrete valley gutters. 3. All public streets and utilities necessary to provide service to this development shall be designed by a registered professional engineer in accordance with City Coaes and engineering stanaares and policies and approved by staff prior to recoraing of Waiver. 4. A detailed grading, drainage, erosion and seuiment control plan must be prepared in accordance with current City stannaras and approved by staff prior to recording of Waiver. 5. If any public improvements are to be installed under a City contract, the appropriate project must be approved by Council action prior to recording of Waiver. 6. This development shall be responsible tor the acquisition of all regulatory agency permits in the time frame required by the affected agency. 7. All signs shall be subject to the one-time sign fee of: $2.50 per square foot. 8. The developer and owner of the southerly portion of Lot 14 shall combine this parcel or lana with the southerly portion of Lot 16 under one tax identification parcel number with the Dakota County Auditor. All voted in favor. WAIVER OF PLAT - NATIONAL MINERALS CORPORATION--' Chairrnan Pa ned the next -public hearing regarding the application for a Waiver.. -d- ' in order to split Lot 10, Eagancale Center Indusfr.ial-PurK 3rd Addition, ateci along the south sine of Lone C'a --Road, ed..a. of Lunar Lane in the nor mast -r rter of Section _ a Agenda Information Memo September 6, 1988, City Council Meeting PRELIMINARY PLAT/SENECA PLANT ADDITION K. Preliminary Plat for Seneca Plant Addition/Metro Waste Control Commission, Consisting of 87.83 Acres for Expansion of the Seneca Waste Water Treatment Plant --A public hearing was held by the Advisory Planning Commission at their regular meeting held on August 23, 1988 to consider a preliminary plat consisting of 87.83 acres for the expansion of the Seneca Waste Water Treatment Plant. The APC is recommending denial of the plat. For a copy of the Planning �dEngineering Department report, refer to pages [r19 through For a copy of a letter and petition submitted by surrounding neighbors, refer to pages (e1:1 -through «"1 . Also enclosed are two 2) fact sheets prepared by the MWCC, referenced as pages through pOID. Following the fact sheets is a letter from the MWCC that specifically addresses the necessity for the expa9,pipp project, that letter is referenced as pages p through00:76. Enclosed on pages c207 through e;?(3 is a copy of the APC minutes. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the preliminary plat consisting of 87.83 acres for the expansion of the Seneca Waste Water Treatment Plant located west of Comanche Road in the west half of Section 17, east half of Section 18. CITY OF EAGAN SUBJECT: PRELIMINARY PLAT METROPOLITAN WASTE CONTROL ADDITION APPLICANT: MINNESOTA WASTE CONTROL COMMISSION/ DOUG WARNER LOCATION: PART OF THE W 1/2 OF SECTION 17 PART OF THE E 1/2 OF SECTION 18 EXISTING ZONING: I-1 (LIGHT INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT) DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: JULY 26, 1988 DATE OF REPORT: JULY 21, 1988 REPORTED BY: PLANNING AND ENGINEERING DEPARTMENTS APPLICATION SUMMARY An application has been submitted requesting a Preliminary Plat consisting of one industrial lot containing 87.82 acres for the expansion of the Seneca waste water treatment plant located in sections 17 and 18 of Eagan. COMMENTS Mr. Doug Warner of the Metropolitan Waste Control Commission has been working with the City in order to inform the City of MWCC's plans to expand the waste water treatment facility. Presently, the plat treats twenty-four million gallons of sewage per day and the expansion would double this capacity. The property was not platted in the past and the applicants will include the existing area as well as the proposed expansion in the Preliminary Plat containing the one lot. Mr. Warner has informed the City that this expansion will take a couple of years to complete but to stay on the schedule to meet EPA and PCA standards for water quality, grading must begin this fall and construction of the expansion will be started sometime in 1989 with a completion date in 1991-1992. In review of the Preliminary Plat, the problem which has occured is getting the cooperation of the property owners for MWCC to purchase the additional property that they need. MWCC has submitted an application to the City for processing; however, the owners have not signed the application. In discussing this issue with the City Attorney, this plat should be contingent on the owners signing the application or MWCC condemning the property for the expansion of this plat. Both options are still open and MWCC is hoping that the owners of the property will cooperate and settle on a reasonable price for the property. If not, condemnation procedures will begin. METROPOLITAN WASTE CONTROL ADDITION MWCC was proposing an outlot on the westerly portion of the property. Staff is suggesting that this outlot be eliminated and included in lot 1, block 1 at this time for the fact that no access is provided to the property and that this proposed outlot is being proposed to be tied to the property west. The City has been informed that a radio station is looking to expand the radio antennaes for broadcasting and this is one site that the company is looking at for the tower site location. The City is in the process of analyzing this to see what impacts this would have on the Fort Snelling State Park to the north and the east. Mr. Warner will be at the meeting to give a presentation of the proposed plans to expand the Seneca treatment plant at the July 26 Planning Commissiion meeting. GRADING/DRAINAGE/EROSION CONTROL: The proposed grading plan shows massive amounts of material being stripped and stockpiled onsite creating two large mounds. The proposed grading exposes suitable material for plant expansion construction. The material being removed from the proposed expansion area has a high organic content and is not suitable for use as a subgrade material for construction purposes. All proposed slope areas are in accordance with City codes and standards. The Development has respected the integrity of the existing drainage easement which crosses the site connecting the sedimentation pond constructed to serve the Kennebec Drive area and the existing railroad trestle which drains to the Minnnesota River Valley. Since the Development is proposing only rough site grading at this point, details for storm sewer requirements are subject to further review when site development details are available for staff review. An erosion and sediment control plan was not submitted as a part of the preliminary plat application. The storm water runoff from the site drains to the Minnesota River basin via culverts under the adjacent railroad tracks. A significant drainage channel passes through this site and needs to be maintained during all phases of construction. Several trapping measures need to be used to minimize transport of sediment to the Minnesota River. The following general criteria for an erosion and sediment control plan are required to be addressed in a plan before a grading permit is issued or final plat approval: 1. Establishment of Vegetation: The perimeter and stockpile areas of this site will require rapid revegetation. The seeding and mulching specifications need to be provided on the proposed erosion and sediment control plan and a general construction schedule should outline when seeding will take place. 2. Sediment -Basins: The proposed stock piles show slopes that are too long, steep and high to be controlled with the use of a silt fence alone. A combination of diversions and temporary sedimentation basins will be needed to keep sediment from entering the drainage easement- area. These structures can be removed after a permanent vegetative cover is established on the stockpiles. Design calculations and structure detail should be provided on the plan. 3. Cut and Fill Slopes: The slope along the planned south boundary will be disturbed by storm water from the drainage area to the south. A clean water diversion should be constructed on the slope to divert water to the drainage easement and bypass the proposed cut slope. 4. Working In or Crossing Waterways: The drainage easement that is located between soil stockpile areas needs to be kept functional while grading and hauling is occurring across the easement. To this end, a temporary stream crossing will be required for all haul roads. A detailed drawing and location for this practice needs to be on the proposed erosion and sediment control plan. 5. Disposition and Maintenance: A contact person needs to be named on the plan who will be responsible for erosion control concerns should they arise. ASSESSMENTS: A search of City records show no pending assessments of record and the following assessments are proposed in accordance with City special assessment policies in effect at this time: PROJ # DESCRIPTION RATE QUANTITY AMOUNT 428 Storm Sewer Trunk .083/sf 3,166,951 $262,857 Water Trunk $1,315/ac 52.61 $ 69,182 Water Availability Charge $2,015/ac 52.6 $106,009 TOTAL PROPOSED ASSESSMENT $438,048 All final assessment obligations will be calculated based on the final plat areas and dimension and the rates in effect at the time of the final plat approval. CONDITIONS: METROPOLITAN WASTE CONTROL 1. These standard conditions of plat approval as adopted by Council action on September 15, 1987 shall be complied with: Al, Bl, B2, B4, Cl, C2, C4, D1, D1, F1, and G1. 2.. Either condemnation is expedited or the owner of the property sign the Preliminary Plat application before the Preliminary Plat will be approved. 3. The applicant must meet all ETB and PCA rules and regulations for the development of this property. STANDARD CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL A. Assessments 1. This development shall accept its additional assessment obligations as defined in the staff's report in accordance with the final plat dimensions and the rates in effect at the time of final plat approval. B. Easements and Rights -of -Way 1. This development shall dedicate 10' drainage and utility easements centered over all common lot lines and adjacent to private property or public right-of-way. 2. This development shall dedicate, provide, or financially guarantee its proportionate share of the acquisition costs of additional drainage,. ponding, and utility easements as required by the alignment, depth, and storage capacity of all required public utilities and streets located beyond the boundaries of this plat or outside of dedicated public right-of-way as necessary to service this development. 3. This development shall dedicate all public right-of-way and temporary slope easements for ultimate development of adjacent roadways as required by the appropriate jurisdictional agency. 4. This development shall dedicate adequate drainage and ponding easements to incorporate the required high water elevation necessitated by City storm water storage volume requirements. C. Plans and Specifications 1. All public streets and utilities necessary to provide service to this development shall be designed by a registered professional engineer in accordance with City codes and engineering standards and policies, and approved by staff prior to final plat approval. 2. A detailed grading, drainage, erosion, and sediment control plan must be prepared in accordance with current City standards and approved by staff prior to final plat approval. 3. This development shall insure that all temporary dead end public streets shall have a cul-de-sac constructed in accordance with City engineering standards. 4. A detailed landscape plan shall be submitted on the proposed grading plan and approved by staff prior to the final plat approval. The financial guarantee shall be included in the Development Contract and not released until one year after the date of installation. lea STANDARD CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL PAGE TWO 5. All internal public and private streets shall be constructed within the required right-of-way in accordance with City design standards. D. Public Improvements 1. If any public improvements are to be installed under a City contract, the appropriate project must be approved by Council action prior to final plat approval. E. Permits 1. This development shall be responsible for the acquisition of all regulatory agency permits in the time frame required by the affected agency. F. Parks Dedication 1. This development shall fulfull its parks dedication requirements as recommended by the Advisory Parks and Recreation Commission and approved by Council action. G. Other 1. All standard platting and zoning conditions shall be adhered to unless specifically granted a variance by Council action. Advisory Planning Commission City Council Approved: August 25, 1987 September 15, 1987 Revised: LTS#2 STANDARD L—oc.is..11 t. 1-1 --t-i ti -i cA &i2. '7 -M1,1 1,6 -P 415'1 '3111 'sal ot q uo.a,Cary ualatlalaJJS J.1O o • tL • a 8a • /. SURVEY OF: /y vS4 fl • • i 1 wcc U P_1 < CO a N ' Lf) LID rc > S U F J fr w WATER TRUNK i Al /.'n::-, r 765 O ` . i 11 % 769.4 i.. „ •/'/��y '1 // /� -ice •a• `' L �2i.N �/ 4 +... _ - t• v r%'•`l_-AP-27, c.7� i. --•` m/ ?• A -C,-- 796.3 . *� •- � '�••••••••'•••• ., 802.4 .';,:ii -_,-,i. N N. - ..ate.•: -0�/ / A'bDD E ''':-11).10F::7:''' :Of F,t=: - ; •£� \4 �/ }t:� •:•• • :••'••••• • r { A 1 TION '� its\ � `:' ' A_D AP 38 •. 8399 8 r,. - B4/.4 �t--. 29639�_A_{1h gyp. I\ 'P. 7036• �:�• i� b� �y�Vr. ~' t2 l\,�. , ,% A ;fes �#.6t.t,i vE SE6 PIER/! _,i c.' >,. -d A -J BIB. 8_.__L: -- ' cc;,j...-,,:+Y; , 8013 t2' en.i..' L (`-' .111 i T.. ' ���v'' vts.r A-t�/ i 54' ' h''.;,f=l"_''J'•'..-1;H- ,c• ) j r i' .,`� l" — j/ m, , j' AP^3 `r'3q'.t-; ,5r^% a `i / \`,. `�' A-ccc'Com/Al:'; 2',1 > :• :;' l,t�=1, 8663_-''E.- .•�.r _ ;.; 1..i _ A -D A_ city of eagan PUBLIC rlEt�• WORKS DEPARTMEN . 697! I A 96 -700 \/j y I ( f '5'80.j/102.4' t 133 -6 7%IfP6 Ob SUBJECT PARCEL FIG # 3 city of eagan ma=r' PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT WATER approved: standard plate #: MASTER PLAN August 29, 1988 Environmental Quality Board Content. A. Metropolitan Waste Control Commission - Seneca Plant Addition- Preliminary Plat consisting of 87.83 acres for the expansion of the Seneca Water Treatment Plant. B. Metropolitan Waste Control Commission. C. Petitioners represenative- Theadore Thoennes 2135 Wuthering Hgts. Rd. Eagan, MN 452-8208 or Elizabeth Bassett 2101 Wuthering Hgts. Rd. Eagan, MN 454-6146 D. The Seneca plant does not have the technology to handle the present problems. or does not care to spend the money to keep the promises they originally made about effects an the environment of their present plant. They have been cited for air pollution and water pollution. They want an additional acreage which will give them 137 acres, but they will not say what their future expansion plans are. Eagan has changed from a mostly rural area to a light industrial, business, residential area in the 16 years since the plant was built.Since the plant was built, Fort Snelling State Park has been extended to the Cedar Bridge. and would be the neighbor along one side of the 137 acres. We are concerned about air pollution. ground water pollution, flood plain pollution.water table pollution, the SMELL, nitrates,the stored ash(stored on the property and sent to So. Dakota every so often -and hear that South Dakota wants to send this ash back to Minnesota -Eagan). We question the height and condition of the sriokettack. E.The expansion would be partly into the flood plain not within the Floodway Limits as delineated in the Flood -Plain Limits as delineated in the Flood -Plain areas of the Lower Minnesota River, U.S. Geological Survey. 1973. There has been flood water south of the railroad tracks in wet years. They propose to dig out peat and make two giant mountains near the railroad tracks. We had five fires along those tracks this summer, a dry year. We fear the peat could catch on fire; it would be on top of their feeder sewer pipes; it would cover a perched feen, a calcirus feen.a beaver pond. and rare plants. This has also been a favorite walking. skiing, and bicyling area. When they put in the feeder pipes . there was so much water that the pipes floated to the top.(they went down 50 feet) They needed de -watering wells,which were never plugged We want them to clean up their act before exposing Eagan to any more environmental problems. We were never informed that Eagan had,��.' requested a EAW. We do not trust the Senaca plant. JI We petition. the Eagan Planning Commission and the Eagan Mayor and Council to have done an Environmental Impact study on the proposed expansion and upgrading of the Seneca Sewer Plant: We question the smell. the smoke, the flood plain, the hills of stored peat.the wild -life refuge.and the effect on land values and the quality of life. NAME 1- t 1/ ADDRESS .>j if l _j •, ,rI. ^i 1, 0 'nn • ) /C/ L(%_c. t, N iglu -nt+-1 ren:;, f 1 k CAG P'- , f-1/•/ L' 'l,N ('i �' !� —) �`<..:C��Z- Vit, ci -) 7 /' I •i ,� 1_�LJ �,n 1.Y: 1 (J (,1r( " \ lr, r.r^% 7 n i.' i �C 1�y1 ?//•,3 7. ' ' n • .1 / 17.2 Acs4/`` RI 2/ �7 S/ if g d, J f L_ ce c /;/'` cy t:`,=t i3Of:. tt1� Cr MFA. Jp i!11 sir "===fr416±V}a611.ii _ • • —v«ik cuy /3 The following questions are suggested by EQB staff as indicators of potentially significant environmental effects. DOES THE PROPOSED ACTION HAVE THE POTENTIAL FOR: ` 1. A substantial adverse change in existing air quality or noise levels? ^ :•.-' .i 2. A substantial increase in solid or hazardous waste production? 3. A substantial increase in potential for erosion, flooding or drainage problems? '577 4. A substantial adverse effect on surface or ground water quality or on wetlands? .1,1 5. The removal or destruction of substantial quantities of vege- tation or fauna, substantial interference with the movement of any resident or migratory fish or wildlife species, substantial adverse effect on a significant habitat area, or substantial adverse effects on a threatened or endangered species or the habitat of the species? 6. The creation of a hazard to human health or safety? 7. Inconsistency or incompatibility with adopted land use plans, transportation plans, community goals, or state or federal environmental statutes, regulations or rules? A/ ,, j 8. The impairment of the character or quality of important histor- ical , archaeological, architectural , or aesthetic resources? /� g�Li✓�-C, 0 --me 9. The impairment or destrIr i1n-'of unique geographic areas such as park lands, prime or unique farm lands, wild and scenic rivers, or ecologically critical areas? 10. A substantial increase in the amount of energy used or a major change in the type of energy used? 36 J • •Za;:. \V) \/ • P • 1:)/ r:.04 • • CORPORATE LIMITS 0 m Cedar Pkv cove • ' . • •• . ' ' •: ' ' '‘ \ \\ cs,\.\<'/ "- Alder Isyle ‘•,--_—_,‘..-. cl.cis 1 0 c. SEC. 11.80. FLOOD PLAIN REGULATIONS. Subd. 1. Finding of Facts and Purposes. A. A portion of the lands within the regu- lating jurisdiction of the City is subject to recurrent flooding by overflow of rivers and other watercourses caus- ing a hazard to life and property, disruption of commerce and governmental services and the interruption of transpor- tation and communications, all of which are found by the Council to be detrimental to the health, safety, welfare and property of residents of the City. B. It is the purpose of this Section to promote the public health, safety, and general welfare by minimizing the losses described in Subparagraph A above. Subd. 2. Definition. The following terms, as used in this Section, shall have the meanings stated: 1. "Regulatory Flood Protection Elevation" - A point not less than one foot above the water surface profile associated with the regional flood plus any increases in the flood heights attributable to encroachments on the flood plain. It is the elevation to which uses regulated by this Section are required to be elevated or flood proofed. Subd. 3. General Provisions. A. Application. This Section shall apply to all lands within the Flood -Plain Limits not within the Floodway Limits as delineated in the Flood -Plain areas of the Lower Minnesota River, U.S. Geological Survey, 1973. This survey is hereby adopted by reference and shall be on file in the office of the City Clerk. B. Zoning. The lands defined in Subpara- graph A above shall be so labeled on the official zoning map of the Cityand shall constitute a separate zoning classifi- cation entitled Flood Fringe Plain (FP). Regulations within this Section shall apply in addition to any regulations imposed by this Chapter. C. Compliance. No structure or land located in a FP District (as defined in Subparagraph B above) shall hereafter be used and no structure shall be located, extended, converted, or structurally altered without full compliance with the terms of this Section and other appli- cable regulations which apply to uses within the jurisdic- tion of this Section. (1-1-83) 332 ��� Metropolitan Waste Control Commission Mears Park Centre, 230 East Fifth Street, St. Paul, Minnesota 55101 612 222-8423 FACT SHEET METROPOLITAN WASTE CONTROL COMMISSION 1. The Metropolitan Waste Control Commission (MWCC) was established by the Minnesota Legislature in 1969 to efficiently collect and treat the wastewater of the Twin Cities metropolitan area, while preserving and protecting the environment. 2. The MWCC owns and operates the wastewater treatment system in the metropolitan area and treats 275 million gallons of wastewater per day. The system serves 105 communities and includes 12 treatment plants and 500 miles of interceptor sewer pipes (those pipes shared by two or more communities and that carry sewage from the communities to MWCC's plants for treatment). The MWCC is also responsible for new construction and maintenance within the system. 3. The MWCC has 980 employees and an annual budget of $108,000,000. MWCC's capital budget is approved by the Metropolitan Council, the long -rage planning and coordinating agency for the metropolitan area. 4. There is a nine -member board of commissioners responsible for policy-making at the MWCC. The Minnesota governor appoints the chairman, who serves at the governor's pleasure. The Metropolitan Council appoints the other eight members, who serve for four-year terms. Day-to-day operations are administered by the MWCC staff, headed by the chief administrator. 5. To track the effectiveness of its treatment program, the MWCC conducts 200,000 environmental lab tests per year, sampling air quality, raw sewage, ground water, and receiving waters (waters that receive MWCC's treated wastes). 6. For four consecutive years, MWCC's largest plant (the Metro Plant), which treats over half of all wastewater in the state, received awards from the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency for maintaining a compliance record of 100% of the state and federal regulations governing MWCC's work. 7. The U.S. Department of Energy has presented MWCC with a Special Recognition National Award for Energy Innovation for a solids processing/energy recovery system that is saving area taxpayers $3 million annually. MPF:cmj 12/14/87 sc;\.S Metropolitan Waste Control Commission Mears Park Centre, 230 East Fifth Street, St. Paul, Minnesota 55101 612 222-8423 CONTACT: Diane Wanner (612) 229-2100 FACT SHEET SENECA WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT EXPANSION 1. The Metropolitan Waste Control Commission (MWCC) is planning to expand the Seneca Wastewater Treatment (Seneca) Plant in Eagan, in cooperation with the cities of Eagan, Bloomington, and Burnsville. The plant currently serves nearly 160,000 people in these three communities, as well as parts of Inver Grove Heights, Lakeville and Apple Valley. (Beginning in November 1988, the Seneca Plant will also treat wastewater for Savage.) 2. The $51 million plant expansion will increase the plant's treatment capacity of 24 million gallons of wastewater per day (mgd) by almost one-third to meet the needs of population growth in Eagan, Burnsville and Bloomington. Eagan is the most rapidly growing community of these, with its population doubling to 40,000 during past 5 years. 3. The expansion will also upgrade treatment processes to meet stricter federal and state standards. This will result in improved water quality for the Minnesota River. In addition, odor control measures will be included as part of plant expansion. 4. Plant expansion construction work is expected to begin in late 1988 and be completed in the fall of 1992. Plans for expansion include the addition of treatment units and rehabilitation of existing facilities, as well as building a new aeration blower building, a chlorination/dechlorination building and expansion of maintenance and employee facilities. 5. Fifty-three additional acres of land, adjacent to the current plant site, are expected be acquired by MWCC in conjunction with the expansion. Seventeen acres of the acquired property will be used directly for plant expansion, while the remaining acreage will provide an area of storage of excess soils and a buffer between the Seneca Plant and the surrounding community. 6. The Seneca Plant, one of 12 treatment plants owned and operated by the MWCC, has 51 employees. When the plant was built in 1972 by the Bloomington Eagan Burnsville sanitary sewer district, it was expected that its wastewater treatment capacity would eventually be doubled as the three communities grew. More than 15 miles of interceptor sewer pipes (those pipes shared by two or more -over- communities and that carry sewage from the communities to MWCC's plants for treatment), were also built in the early 1970's by the three communities. Total construction costs for the system were approximately $17 million (equivalent to more than $75 million in 1988 dollars). 7. Primary and secondary treatment processes are used to treat wastewater at the Seneca Plant. In primary treatment, screens and settling tanks separate sand, grit and larger solids from the wastewater, removing 50 percent of the pollutants. In secondary treatment, wastewater is aerated to stimulate natural bacteria, which consume up to 90 percent of the remaining organic pollutants. Disinfection kills remaining bacteria before the water is released into the environment. Dewatering and incineration are the methods used to dispose of sludge, a byproduct of treatment. Ash from incineration of the sludge is stored in lagoons near the plant and periodically removed. 8. The Metropolitan Waste Control Commission was established by the Minnesota Legislature to efficiently collect and treat the wastewater of the Twin Cities metropolitan area, while preserving and protecting the environment. The MWCC serves a total of 105 communities in seven counties and treats 275 million gallons of sewage per day. DKW:cmj 08/15/88 Metropolitan Waste Control Commission Mears Park Centre, 230 East Fifth Street. St. Paul, Minnesota 55101 612 222-8423 August 30, 1988 Mr. Thomas Hedges City Administrator City of Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55122 Re: Seneca Wastewater Treatment Plant Expansion and Upgrade MWCC Project Number 85-57 Dear Mr. Hedges: As you are aware, the Metropolitan Waste Control Commission went before the Eagan Planning and Zoning Commission on August 23, 1988 for approval of a preliminary plat for the Seneca Wastewater Treatment Plant expansion and upgrade project. Our request for approval of the preliminary plat was denied at that time. However, we will be pre- senting our request for approval of the preliminary plat to the City Council on September 6, 1988. In our presentation to the Planning and Zoning Commission, many issues and questions had to be addressed. Two main concerns surfaced during the meeting: 1) Plant odors and, 2) Expansion of the plant to the west on land not now owned by the Metropolitan Waste Control Commission instead of expansion to the east on land the Commission now owns. To a large extent, the issue of expansion to the west versus the east is also related to odors and the desire of neighboring resi- dents to keep the expansion as far away from their property as possible. Because of the large number of issues discussed at the Mr. Hedges MWCC Project No. 85-57 Page 2 8/30/88 meeting, we did not focus our presentation specifically on either the issue of odor control improvements or west versus east expansion. Introduction and Project Need The Seneca Wastewater Treatment Plant expansion and upgrade project is required to treat the increasing volume of wastewater generated in the service area and to meet stricter federal and state wastewater treat- ment standards. The $51 million plant expansion will increase the plant's treatment capacity of 24 million gallons per day by nearly one third, to meet the needs of population growth in Eagan, Burnsville and Bloomington. The plant currently serves nearly 160,000 people in these three com- munities, as well as parts of Inver Grove Heights, Lakeville and Apple Valley. Beginning in November, 1988, the Seneca plant will also serve Savage. The communities of Inver Grove Heights, Lakeville, Apple Valley and Savage represent less than five percent (5%) of the existing flow, based on sewered population, and will only represent nine percent (9%) of the flow in the year 2010. It is estimated that plant capacity, based only on flow, will be exceeded during 1992. In order to meet the more stringent water quality standards, the MWCC has entered into an agreement with the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency requiring an ambitious construction schedule so that standards can be met by mid-1992. If the schedule is delayed, the potential exists for a moratorium on sewer hook-ups. Fifty three (53) additional acres of land, adjacent to the current thirty five (35) acre plant site, are expected to be acquired by MWCC Mr. Hedges MWCC Project 85-57 Page 3 8/30/88 in conjunction with the expansion and will result in a total plant site area of slightly under eighty eight (88) acres. Approximately seventeen acres of the acquired property will be used directly for the plant expansion, while the remaining acreage will provide an area for storage of excess excavated peat soils and a buffer zone between the Seneca plant and the surrounding community. The major expansion work consists of new aeration tanks and final clarifiers located west of the existing headworks area, primary clari- fiers, sludge dewatering facilities and sludge incinerators. Other work consists of remodeling existing facilities, adding odor control, and adding new maintenance and employee facilities to the existing solids handling building. Odor Control Measures Planned Areas identified as odor sources in the existing plant include the headworks screenings room, aerated grit tanks, primary clarifiers, final clarifiers, sludge thickening building, sludge dewatering, and the solids processing building. While the Seneca Wastewater Treatment Plant expansion and upgrade project includes only the liquid treatment areas, there are projects proposed or being planned to address all plant odor sources. Nearly three million dollars worth of proven odor reduction technology is being installed at the Seneca plant in con- junction with the plant expansion. In addition to the plant areas listed above, the Bloomington lift station and flow metering station have been identified as odor sour- ces. These facilities are located on Nicols Road near the Chicago and Northwestern Railroad tracks. a�3 Mr. Hedges MWCC Project No. 85-57 Page 4 8/30/88 Carbon odor adsorption units have recently been installed at the Bloomington lift station and the flow metering station. The lift sta- tion unit is fully operational and the meter station unit is under- going some alterations to achieve full operation. Odor filtration units similar to these have been used at other Commission facilities with very good success and have been found to remove all, or nearly all, of the odor causing compounds. Odor control measures for the headworks area and primary clarifiers call for capturing odorous air and treating it in a two-stage system using a chemical scrubber followed by a carbon adsorption unit. Two carbon units will be provided. One carbon unit will be used as standby but will have ducting to allow air to flow through all three units prior to discharge.' In addition, facilities will be provided for injection of chlorine into the raw wastewater as an additional odor control feature. Chlorine oxidizes sulfides in the wastewater preventing their release into the air which would cause a rotten egg type odor. This system should remove all or nearly all of the odor causing compound from the air. Part of the plant expansion includes using compressed air and fine bubble diffusers in the aeration tanks. The new system will reduce odors resulting from surface turbulents of the wastewater and from anaerobic bacteria. In addition, new circular final clarifiers will improve odor control by preventing sludge from collecting on the sides of the tanks and will include a new skimmer system to more effectively remove floating solids which might cause odors. a 0 (/ Mr. Hedges MWCC Project No. 85-57 Page 5 8/30/88 Sludge thickening, dewatering and incineration at the Seneca plant is being evaluated as part of a study of sludge management (treatment and disposal) in the southwest metro area. The study is evaluating man- agement of sludge solids generated at the Chaska WWTP, the Blue Lake WWTP in Shakopee, and the Seneca WWTP in Eagan. The study is divided into two phases. Phase one of the study, which evaluated the "universe" of sludge treatment alternatives for all three plants is nearly complete. To date, conclusions of the study are that thickening and dewatering of Seneca sludge at Seneca will continue. However, incineration of sludge at Seneca may or may not be a final recommendation. The proposal for upgraded sludge treatment facilities (not part of the plant expansion), provides for sludge thickening and sludge dewatering in one area instead of in two separate locations as is the current practice. This area would be sealed off with a solid wall and odorous air treated with a two-stage chemical scrubber. The first stage would use a dilute caustic solution to remove hydrogen sulfide (rotten egg odor). The second stage would use a combination of chlorinated water and dilute caustic solution. This second combination of chemicals is designed to remove organic odor constituents, as well as any residual hydrogen sulfide. In addition to the scrubbers, potassium permanganate, a strong oxi- dizing agent, will be added into the sludge prior to the thickening or dewatering processes. The potassium permanganate will work to oxidize (destroy) most of the sulfides (rotten egg odor) and many of the orga- nic odor compounds prior to the point were the sludge comes in contact aos Mr. Hedges MWCC Project No. 85-57 Page 6 8/30/88 with the air. This is done now, but it cannot totally eliminate odor causing compounds from the sludge. Currently, sludge is taken from the dewatering area to the incinera- tors on open conveyor belts which allow odors to escape to the surrounding air. The future system will use a solidspumping system and enclosed piping which will control odor migration into the building ventilation air. The odor control systems and process improvements already installed or proposed in the Seneca plant expansion project and sludge handling facility upgrading project should stop septic and rotten egg -type odors from leaving the Seneca wastewater treatment plant, the Bloomington lift station, and the flow metering station. Since it is unknown at this time whether the incinerators will con- tinue to be used at Seneca, no project has been initiated to add equipment to remove odors from the incinerator exhaust discharged from the smoke stack. If incinerator use is continued, exhaust stream afterburners will be installed, along with other improvements which will reduce odor generation. The afterburners are equipment which provides a separate area where the incinerator exhaust is contacted with a high temperature natural gas or other fuel flame and remaining unoxidized compounds (odor causing compounds) are burned or destroyed. Plant Construction - West Versus East The apparent motivation for concern on the plant expansion to the west versus east is the belief that such an expansion will worsen the impact of odors on neighborhoods lying west of the plant. This is not Mr. Hedges MWCC Project No. 85-57 Page 7 8/30/88 correct. The odor situation will improve markedly after the plant expansion is complete. The impact odors will have on the surrounding community is substantially independent of the configuration of the plant expansion because odors from the major sources will be controlled. The only viable scheme for expanding in a different direction called for a "mirror image" expansion (an expansion substan- tially identical to the existing plant) to the east. This was part of the original Seneca WWTP design concept and is one reason the original plant was sited on the westerly portion of the property, leaving an area to the east vacant. This concept is no longer valid because a "mirror image" expansion can't treat wastewater to today's advanced standards. Such a plan simply won't work. During the recent planning process, all alternatives which provided for advanced treatment, employed westerly expansion schemes. Such schemes have operational advantages over schemes employing some facilities to the east and some to the west, and no disadvantages. Such east/west expansion schemes, while technically feasible, are somewhat akin to a home improvement project that locates the dishwasher in the living room. I hope the information provided in this letter provides a clearer pic- ture of the odor control measures proposed by the Metropolitan Waste Control Commission and how these measures fit into the overall plant odor control plan. In addition, I hope my comments on the issue of plant expansion to the west versus the east has shed some additional light on why the Metropolitan Waste Control Commission has chosen to expand the plant to the west. o'j (i Edward J. DeLaForest O Director of Engineering and Construction Mr. Hedges MWCC Project No. 85-57 Page 8 8/30/88 If you have any questions, please feel free to contact Commissioner JoEllen Hurr at 471-9801, Commissioner Bruce Baumann at 451-2974 or me. Very truly C&-c-n-c2----__ EJD:FDW:pap L-79 cc: MWCC Commissioner Baumann MWCC Commissioner Hurr MWCC Commissioner Mahon James Hiniker, MWCC Page 9/PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES August 23, 1988 10. All sides of the buildings shall be treatea architecturally with the same materials. 11. The parking lot layout tor Lot 1, Block 1, shall be revisea, having 18' -length stalls where curbing is provided. 12. All landscaping shall be compatible in size, specie, and quantity. Effort to save existing hardwooa species snail be demonstrated wherever possible. 13. All site generated storm water runoff is required to be conveyed to Pond AP -14. 14. The development is required to submit the detail plans and specifications for the proposed retaining wall construction for staff review and approval prior to final plat approval. 15. The site plan details of the proposed Lot 1, Block 1, development are subject to further review and requirements as a part of the rinal plat review process. 16. The developer agrees that the following uses will be prohibited in the Planned Development: raaio/tv, outaoor storage, lodges, swimming pools, garden store, movie theatres and municipal -type buildings. All voted in favor. Chairman Pawlenty and the Commission -members informed the public that because of the time frame, the Commission would be holaing public hearings for the Seneca Plant Addition and the Wescott Square Addition at the meeting and the remaining items on the agenda unaer New Business would be continued to a Special Advisory Planning Commission meeting on August 30, 1988. SENECA PLANT ADDITION - METROPOLITAN WASTE CONTROL COMMISSION Chairman Pawlenty opened the public hearing regarding the preliminary plat consisting of 87.83 acres for the expansion of the Seneca Water Treatment Plant located west of Comanche Road in the west half of Section 17 aria the east half of Section 18. City Planner Dale Runkle stated that as a result of concerns raised by adjacent residential -property owners at the last month's APC meeting, a neighborhood meeting was held on August 22, 1988. He stated that staff had further reviewed the proposed grading plan and the visual effect the proposed mounds of earth would -have on the adjacent residential properties. He stated the two proposed westerly mounds of earth would definitely affect the residential properties' view of the Minnesota River. He stated that an additional concern ocl Page 11/PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES August 23, 1988 the incinerator. He outlined possible future expansion plans. He stated that in regard to the mounds of earth from the excavation, the impact on the habitat would be minimizes by the aesicjn. He stated there is a residential area to the south ot the mounas and they would be reduced to enhance the residential view. He presented a cnart to the Commission showing the cross sections of the mounas to show the effect on the residential view. He further stated the csesicnated trout stream would not be impacted. He stated they are working with the ?CA regarding the environmental coordination and that the construction would not affect any wetlanas. He further explained the visibility from different vantage points. No solid waste or hazardous waste would be trucked in and some waste from the users would be put into the system. He stated a fence would surround the plant to keep animals out as the facility is not amenable to wildlife. He further stated that Blue Lake sludge is trucked to the Seneca Plant for incineration. Betty Bassett, 2101 Wuthering Heights Roaa, informea the Commission that the Seneca Plant is already tne second largest plant in Minnesota and already own lana that can be updated. She statea the land is zoned Light Industrial and a zoning change should be required. She stated the flooa plain extenas into the proposed area. She feels the peat could catch tire and that rain could wash material onto the railroad tracks. She stated the area would be a new Pigs Eye. She also said the smell would interfere with the area and that the baa effect would be on the whole city. She urged denial ot tne petition ana statea Seneca should use their present lana. She requested the City conduct an impact study. She questioned what variances were needed to Chapters 11 and 13 of the City Code. Ted Tennis, 2135 Wuthering Heights Roaa, was concerned regarding the peat mounds and the impact the plant would have on the wetlanas. He further statea there is currently a smell from the plant ana the matter would not get better. He stated the Seneca Plant currently processes seven communities and Blue Lake. Mike Hazel, 2129 Silver Bell, stated the original zoning was Light Industrial. He stated the plant does not qualify and he is concerned regarding future uses. Mike Corbit, 2125 Wuthering Heights, statea that odor facilities are planned and questioned if they utilized the state -or -the -art. He stated the presentation was too indetinite. He further statea there is a smell problem and that the residents' view will be impaired. He stated he feels a fence is ugly and that the property values in the area would be reduced. He askea if residents' properties .coula be bought out. Gorgon Eistad, 2111 Wuthering Heights, statea there has been a smell from the plant for many years and that the complaints has not been handled. He stated the smoke stack is level with the blutt ana Page 12/PLANNI G COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES August 23, 1988 that residents are sometimes forced to leave tne area because of tree smell. He stated the mounds would destroy the views ana ne wants guarantees regaraing the ruture developments. Allan Adams, 2132 Silver Bell, stated tnere are many smell problems in the area alreaay ana the addition woula increase tne problem. Mark Johnson, 2113 t:uthering Heignts, was concerned regaraing the peat piles, zne smell, tinancial guarantees, PCA stanaaros ana ruture expansion. Chairman Pawlenty asked the developer what could be done about the smell in the area. The aeveloper stated the areas naa been identified ana that the complaints are wnat generates the project. If there are no changes made, the problem would remain. The Facilities are very expensive. Commission -member Carry Questioned ir the odor control could be separate without the expansion. The eeveioper statea ves. Mr. Garry askea if the aeveloper woula be willing to co this. The aeveloper stated they try to be a gooa neighbor. .•ir. Garry askew if the matter were aeniea, would the developer still aaaress the oaor problem. The developer statea they would. Commission -member Miller asked if there would be more or less oaor if the expansion were approved. The aeveloper stated there woula be less. Commission -member Graves asked why there woula be less of a problem ana questioned if it woula because of the new equipment. He questionea how long it naa been planned. The developer statea the oaor problem has been workea on for several years. Mr. Graves askea ir they naa not come up with a goon solution yet. The aeveloper statea several solutions nave been triea. Mr. Graves asked why no installation or tne facilities has been completea yet. Tne aeveloper statea it was part of tne expansion plans. Mr. Miller asked wny the aeveloper has not installed oaor prevention equipment in the past. The aeveloper statea upgrading is a large expenditure. They are planning the upgraae in a cost effective way. Commission -member Trvgg questionea if there were any controls at the present time. Tne aeveloper stated there are controls but they are not 100% effective. Commission -member Voracek asked what percent of odor the air purifiers remove. The aeveloper statea between 95% and 99.5%. He further stated the meter station is not working properly and is under repair. Mr. Merkley questioned how long it had been derective. The developer statea since February of 1988. Mr. Garry asked what percent causes the smell. Tne aeveloper stated the meter station was unsure. He stated the Seneca Plant goes not use carbon scrubber and the percent is not measurable. Lir. Voracek questioned how they could treat the problem if they do not know the source. The developer stated there are surveys within the plant. Mr. Voracek questioned if the problem was not solved, would the smell be worse with the expansion. The developer stated a secondary treatment is being expanaea which is the lowest oaor source. Mr. Voracek stated he felt the present problem should be cleaned up before the expansion. Page 13/PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES August 23, 1988 Commission -member Garry questioned the Commission at what point would odor control expenditure go forward. He questioned if the odor problem was being used as a leverage for the expansion. Bruce Baumann stated they became aware of the problem two years ago. The plant expansion is a five year process and the odor problem is not being used as a leverage. The land that is available, perhaps not the best use, but it would be used to meet the expansion requirements. The plant will be expanded and odor control woula be a part of the process. The smoke stack issue would be aaaressea. Mr. Garry asked in what way the smoke stack issue would be addressed. Mr. Baumann state° he was not sure but the problem would be improved. Mr. Merkley asked would it be expanded one way or another. Mr. Baumann stated there is a neea to expana ana they are close to capacity. They must meet the discharge requirements. Chairman Pawlenty questioned why the present land was the best. The developer statea there was a combination or ractors such as hydraulics, flexibility, liability, ana future expansion. Chairman Pawlenty asked if the present lana could be used. The developer stated technically yes. However, economically he was not sure. Mr. Merkley asked if the present lana could be used environmentally. The developer stated perhaps. The wetlands are to the west ana much more land would need to be excavated. Mr. Miller asked if staff had a preference. City Planner Dale Runkle statea staff had not looked at that scenario. Trygg questioned if there were other expansions being considered. The developer stated there are no specific plans. Chairman Pawlenty stated that it they received the aaaitional land now, they could expand even further in the future. Mr. Graves asked if additional land had been acquired. The developer stated they were still negotiating. Mr. Graves requested a clarification of the lana acquisition location. Mr. Runkle pointed out the area. Mr. Garry asked if the Commissioner would condemn. Mr. Baumann stated it would be necessary it the negotiations could not be completed. Mr. Garry asked if the Commissioner was aware of the present lana. The Commissioner stated 53 acres would be used as a butter and that he is not involved in the plant design. Jean Latross, MWCC Counsel, stated the owner would accept the offer and that MWCC had already passed a resolution to conaemn. Chairman Pawlenty asked if there was a need for a zoning change. Mr. Runkle statea that a zoning decision naa been mace that the use was appropriate. Chairman Pawlenty questioned what variances woula be requirea. Mr. Runkle stated the reference to variances was stanaara language and that there were no known variances necessary at this time. Chairman Pawlenty questioned when the waste report could be reviewed. The developer stated it was in two phases ana the first Page 14/PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES Page 16/PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES August 23, 1988 stated an expansion in the other direction would move the proposea expansion furtner from the residential area. Chairman Pawlenty questioned what woula be the results if the matter were aeniea by the Planning Commission. The Commissioner statea that staff would have to quickly reassess other expansion methods. He rurtner statea the capacity and the EPA manaatea problems. Member Trygg asked if they could return to the Planning Commission in 30 or 60 aays. Mr. Graves statea tney coulu explore other options ana he wouiu rather have the matter continued.. Mr. Voracek statea the problem would not be soivea in 30 aays. Mr. Miller statea the citizens aid not want the expansion. t•ir. Graves questioned the feelings ot tne other citizens in tne City or Eagan. Mr. Miller statea the feasibility ot caner options snouiu be explorea. £1r. tierklev statea that citizens want a proper operation, not the direction ot the expansion. Voracek moved, Garry seconued, the motion to close the public hearing ana to deny tne request for a preliminary plat consisting or 87.83 acres for the expansion ot the Seneca Nater Treatment Plant located west of the Comanche Road in the west nalf or Section 17 and the east half of Section 18. Garry, Voracek, Pawlenty, Miller, ana Merkley votea in favor; Trygg ana Graves votea against. Some of the reasons for the denial were as follows: 1. The developer should prove they are a good neighbor by taking care of the present oaor problem first before the expansion. 2. The developer cannot pinpoint the source of the odors; they should know the cause and the proportions. 3. The developer should explore the teasibility of expanding onto existing property. 4. The developer should have a solution for the smoke stack problem. 5. MWCC should do their homework ana be prepared to aaaress tne Council concerns. 1ESCOTT SQUARE ADDITIOPN - NEW HORIZON HOMES Chairman Pawlenty openea the public hearing regarding the preliminary plat of 9.83 R-3 (townhouses) zoned acres for 71 units located along Yankee Doodle Roaa ana Elrene Roaa in tne Northeast Quarter of Section 14. Assistant Planner Jim Sturm informed the Commission that at their July 26, 1988, meeting, the item has been continuea unanimously for the following four reasons: Page 15/PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES August 23, 1988 Commission -member Graves made a motion to approve the preliminary plat consisting of 87.83 acres for the expansion of the Seneca Water Treatment Plant located west of Comanche Roan in the west half of Section 17 ana the east half or Section 18, subject to the following conditions: 1. These standard conditions or plat approval as adopted by Council action on September 15, 1987 snall be complied with: Al, Bl, B2, B4, Cl, C2, C4, D1, Fl, and G1 . 2. Either condemnation is expedited or the owner of the property sign the preliminary plat application before the preliminary plat will be approved. 3. The applicant must meet all ETB and PCA rules and regulations for the development of this property. 4. The development is required to limit the elevation of the proposed earth mounds to not exceed elevation 780. 5. The developer must demonstrate to the City how the odor problem and smoke ash problem from the smoke stack would be addressed. Member Voracek stated the developer did not know how to solve the problem and suggested the developer demonstrate that they can ao something before they go ahead. He stated they are trying to get more land so they can expand even further in the future. There was a lack of a second tor Mr. Graves' motion. Mr. Graves questioned why not a preliminary plat for all or the land. Mr. Runkle stated they are platting only the existing ana the proposed plant. The platting would redefine the government tract. Mr. Graves stated he felt the matter should be sent to the Council. He further stated the City must treat the water if they were nearing capacity. Mr. Garry stated the Planning Commission should not do the MWCC's job. He felt that denial would be a strong message. Mr. Graves stated the Planning Commission should tell the MWCC what they wanted. Mr. Voracek stated he did not care if the matter were continued or denied but stated a continuance would not provide enough time. He stated he was not convinced by the presentation. Member Trygg stated the issue concerns everyone. Mr. Voracek stated the MWCC did not do a good job of addressing the issues and recommended sending the matter back for more planning. Chairman Pawlenty stated the Council would have to deal with the matter eventually. Mr. Voracek stated he aid not deny the need for the expansion, but needs more homework none. He '/ Page 16/PLANNING COi•1MISSION £4EETIN;G MINUTES August 23, 1988 stated an extansion in the other direction would move the proposed expansion rurtner from the residential area. Chairman Pawlenty questionea what would be the results if the matter were deniea by the Planning Commission. The Commissioner statea that staff would have to quickly reassess other expansion methods. He further statea the capacity ana the EPA manaatea problems. .ember Trygg asked if they coula return to the Planning Commission in 30 or 60 aays. Mr. Graves stated tney coula explore other options ana he wouia rather have the matter continuea. Mr.Voracekstatea the problem would not be soivea in 30 aays. Mr. Miller statea the citizens did not want the expansion. Mr. Graves questioned the feelings or the other citizens in tne City or Eagan. Mr. Miller statea the feasibility et other ottions snouia be explorea. Mr. Nerklev statea that citizens want a proper cceration, not the cirection or the expansion. Voracek moved, Garry seconded, tne motion co close the public hearing ana to deny tne request or a preliminary plat consisting or 87.83 acres for the expansion or the Seneca Water Treatment Plant located west or the Comanche Roaa in the west nail or Section 17 ana the east halt of Section 18. Garry, Voracek, Pawlenty, Miller, ana Merkley votea in favor; Trygg ana Graves voted against. Some of the reasons for the denial were as follows: 1. The developer should prove they are a good neighbor by taking care of the present oaor problem first before the expansion. 2. The developer cannot pinpoint the source of the odors; they should know the cause and the proportions. 3. The developer should explore the feasibility or expanding onto existing property. 4. The developer should have a solution for the smoke stack problem. 5. MCC should do their homework ana be prepared to aaaress tne Council concerns. WESCOTT SQUARE ADDITION - NEW HORIZON HOMES Chairman Pawlenty openea the public hearing regarding the preliminary plat of 9.83 R-3 (townhouses) zoned acres for 71 units located along Yankee Doodle Roaa ana Elrene Roaa in tne Northeast Quarter_ of Section 14. Assistant Planner Jim Sturm informea the Commission that at their July 26, 1988, meeting, the item has been continuea unanimously for the following four reasons: Agenda Information Memo September 6, 1988, City Council Meeting PRELIMINARY PLAT/WESCOTT SQUARE ADDITION L. Preliminary Plat for Wescott Square Addition/New Horizon Homes of 9.83 R-3 Townhouse Zoned Acres for 71 Units Adjacent to Yankee Doodle and Elrene Road --A public hearing was held by the Advisory Planning Commission at their July 26 meeting, to consider a preliminary plat entitled Wescott Square Addition, consisting of 71 owner occupied townhouses of 9.83 previously zoned R-3 acres. This item was continued by the APC to their August 23 meeting to address four (4) specific points that are outlined in the attached memo for City Council review. For a copy of the Planning an Engineering Department report, refer to pages (7 through e...7 5 For a copy of the APC action on this item, refer o those miliv es, a copy is attached and referenced as pages through The Advisor arks and Recreation Department action is enclosed on page ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the preliminary plat for Wescott Square Addition/New Horizon Homes of 9.83 R-3 zoned acres for 71 units, adjacent to Yankee Doodle and Elrene Road. 4J MEMO TO: DALE C RUNKLE, CITY PLANNER TIMOTHY PAWLENTY, CHAIRMAN MEMBERS OF THE ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: JIM STURM, PLANNER( DATE: AUGUST 18, 1988 SUBJECT: WESCOTT SQUARE ADDITION At the July 26 Advisory Planning Commission meeting, this item was continued unanimously for four specific reasons: 1. To obtain a tree census regarding the location and types of trees. 2. To review the playground issue regarding tot lots. 3. To review the issue regarding the open space and a .reduction of the density. 4. To review and clarify the ordinance question. Attached is a copy of a general tree census. Oaks are found primarily north of the black line except for those shown individually. The applicant intends to modify the grading plan or provide tree wells or retaining walls wherever possible. This plat was reviewed by the Advisory Parks and Recreation Commission at its August 4 meeting and while no land dedication is requested, additional open space for some type of play equipment (tot lot) was recommended. It will again review this plat at its September 1 meeting. It may be necessary to remove a building site since this proposal plats individual lots instead of an open, common space outlot. There was a question regarding the ordinance requirement calling for 6,000 sq. ft. per lot in R-3 districts. Even though each individual lot does not meet that requirement, the overall density of the plat reflects that figure. It could be platted in a condominium fashion where all of the open space is designated as an outlot. The individual lots are desirable since they can easily be sold for separate ownership. The City Attorney will address this issue if additional information is necessary. The original staff report has been attached and all of the conditions are still applicable. • Planner j Attachment JS/mc �l1 SC /' \ ` /` r`\` / -- ;-/��````„\`��, / i (�- \ `.-� -'' `` \1 I/ /' !`1 7 | ' / '[`\�.�� '''.^m\.`� ````8 ' �```/�/ ! '-^~/-�� -',\'.. ' /.//',. -' -\'` ,�A| / I � ~,.' ' '' ".'' ..". /�� ''�.. 1 ~'--'�-``... `-/ ' ' ' '''�.' \.'',/|`| --- .&` `3 ' ` �~-'' ' . ' .'.�-, //` J \ '`` N. ' m` ``,\/ 3\ `/ `' '' `.:�. /', /\ J ` . , ov'~.-� ' �• i '' . ," . i ``/ ‘1.``��.^`^--- -1 --� p - I \�`. '.'. :'------ \' — � ` - .`' ' `=- `''``.�\¢ 1 ,,���� ) �� ��!~ ~' ,\�'``.` ' ' ~L �•A�\'.` \e / �' / '``| IN 1(.121 `/ ` /,/ / ':‘\'` ` `4� 1 � ```� ,�| � ' �� /i�'t\ / " �'�`�r' ` L. ,,/ b\._'▪ ' :f..,/ / ,,'> `````,s_''',': -./ /,,^0/ //'\,`. ~---'� I<''/ - ''''�/ 1,'' n {• '` .`' /.� - !� � - �- � ` \ • ` `` \ \ 1 1 --/,' I l J--_'- )<'/ ^/' `/ / !/ .`\ /,/ ";o ' ‘,.. '' �!/'I��-, �/��''� --�)`'`A/'/^, .‘z;*-'�(/))/,/�^��/ /.�/ 1 |',.i/ -�/��1 ' / iU � '`'X/// '' r / » ' ' ' [ �. ' ' //�'/^// ' ` `' <'///[i�//i./ ', /, _- il_ -~ 4 ' ,r- - -=-` C.,°=- - ' - • `.. .'-\ `'' . \ 'lii// l / ' '.'/` . `.`-'' / | / 1 1 .'.� • � ' . /'-' ' /.I �/ ' / ` / \ / / /```.. \ -_- ) k, -- -, owl& ,~r -- 1 '` 777z� //\ /v / II ____ ����'��,` � . , / -_ ---- ` /./'' / / /�,-�� /// ////«'o��/ /// // '/' 1 A � ' t It Xi MEMORANDUM TO: ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION DALE RUNKLE, PLANNING DIRECTOR FROM: KEN VRAA, DIRECTOR OF PARKS & RECREATION STEPHEN SULLIVAN, LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT/PARK PLANNER DATE: AUGUST 15, 1988 RE: WESCOTT SQUARE ADDITION In response to the Advisory Planning Commission request at the July 26th meeting, the Advisory Parks and Recreation Commission reviewed the Wescott Square Addition and the adequacy of parks within the service area given this multiple family proposal. The Commission felt that the multi -family areas within Neighborhood Park Service Area 14 will be adequately served by Woodland School/Park. Also, Wescott Station Park and O'Leary Park provide supplementary support to this service area. Population projections were made based on existing development and zoning, and indicators show the park amenitites available within this and adjacent parks should be adequate to meet the projected population needs for major park facilities. The recommendation of the Commission is as follows: - Wayne Sames moved ,.that the Commission recommend that the developer provide, at minimum,' an open space area within the development and the Advisory Parks and Recreation Commission consider a park dedication credit based on what amenitites the developer proposed to include. The motion further stated that the developer should provide plans for proposed recreational opportunities within the development, and come before the Advisory Parks and Recreation Commission at it's September 1st meeting to consider possible dedication credit. The motion was seconded by JoAnne Alt with all members voting in favor. In summation, the Commission requested the developer to provide an open space area with recreational amenitites to service the development's residents, and that the proposed parks will meet the needs of the service population. KV/bls 1 CITY OF EAGAN SUBJECT: PRELIMINARY PLAT, VARIANCE WESCOTT SQUARE ADDITION APPLICANT: NEW HORIZON HOMES LOCATION: NW 1/4 OF SECTION 14 EXISTING ZONING: R-3 (TOWNHOUSE) DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: JULY 26, 1988 DATE OF REPORT: JULY 18, 1988 REPORTED BY: PLANNING AND ENGINEERING DEPARTMENTS APPLICATION SUMMARY An application has been submitted requesting a Preliminary Plat for the Wescott Square Addition consisting of seventy-one owner - occupied townhouses on 9.83 previously -zoned R-3 acres at the southwest intersection of Yankee Doodle and Elrene Roads. This proposal is in conformance with the City's most recent Land Use Plan. EXISTING CONDITIONS The area is heavily wooded near the center of the plat with some mature oaks and other hardwood species. Along the west and south property lines there is scrub deciduous material that will be removed with either site grading or road improvements. The remaining portion of the site has been cultivated and the existing farmhouse isnot being included in the plat. That exception contains approximately 2.3 acres and if it ever develops in a similar way, access can be provided directly from Elrene Road or a private drive from the proposed townhouses. The site is surrounded by developed R-3 and R-4 Wescott Hills Additions to the west, undeveloped agricultural and R-4 land to the south, and the Gopher Eagan planned development to the north and east. The planned development contains roadside business zoning on the southeast corner of Elrene Road and Yankee Doodle Road and light industrial zoning on the north side of Yankee Doodle Road. Both Elrene Road and Mike Collins Drive have been blacktopped but Elrene is only a two-lane rural road without curb and gutter. Kost Road has dedicated right-of-way only; the gravel roadway will have to be improved to full City standards with this proposal. A private loop road connecting Kost Road and Mike Collins Drive serves these seventy-one units. There is no direct access to a living unit from any of the public streets. The developer is 04P- WESCOTT SQUARE ADDITION proposing a cluster type of development, providing more individual unit privacy than a row house effect. The grading plan and proposed retaining wall demonstrate the applicant's attempt to save some of the tree stand near the center of the site. All building and parking setbacks meet code requirements and the landscape plan meets all policy performance standards. The net density of the project is 7.2 units per acre. Code requires a 6,000 sq. ft. minimum lot area for each unit. Fifty- five are under this requirement but the average for the entire project is 6,049 sa. ft. and all open space will be maintained by a homeowners association. The individual lot platting now will eliminate the potential need to replat to this form in the future. The units are proposed to be constructed with a rough -sawn cedar exterior with decorative brick along the garage area and lower portion of the rear side of the building. The building coverage is 19% in a 20o -maximum district and the impervious coverage is 42%. Some of the double garages do not meet the coda size requirement of a 20' width and 22' length. Attached with this report are the code amendments for residential development passed at the July 5, 1988 City Council meeting. aD GRADING/DRAINAGE/EROSION CONTROL: The preliminary grading plan submitted as a part of this application proposes cut and fill areas ranging from 15' in the center portion of the site to approximately 9' in the southwest corner of this site respectively. The proposed grading plan attempts to preserve two small areas of existing vegetation in the central portions of proposed Block 4 and Block 3. The development is required to revise the proposed grading plan to eliminate the drainage swale along the southerly portion of Block 3. The elimination of the proposed swale along the southerly portion of Block 3 will result in a revision to the proposed house pad elevations adjacent to the drainage swale. An 11' high retaining wall is proposed along the southerly edge of the detention pond located in the northwesterly corner of the development. The development will be required to submit engineering documentation which supports the proposed retaining wall design for staff review and approval. The existing storm sewer system in Mike Collins Drive is capable of handling approximately 50o to 70% of the runoff generated by the proposed drainage area tributary to said existing storm sewer system. The development is proposing a ponding area in the northwesterly corner of the development adequately sized to reduce the potential storm water runoff from the site by approximately 30%. The development is proposing to construct a portion of the ponding area on County highway right-of-way. The development is required to maintain the proposed 0.87 acre feet of storage volume entirely on the proposed Wescott Square development property. Ponding of site generated storm water runoff is also proposed in the southeasterly corner of the development. There is no outlet readily available to this proposed ponding area. The storm sewer system to the south of the proposed Wescott Square development is not developed. Council authorization of the appropriate public improvement to develop the down stream storm sewer system to Pond JP -33 is required prior to final plat approval. Pond JP -33 is a designated ponding area in the City of Eagan's Comprehensive Storm Sewer plan. Pond JP -33 is located approximately 2,000' south of the most southerly corner of the proposed Wescott Square development. The ultimate development of the southeasterly proposed ponding area is subject to revision dependent upon the final profile of Kost Road. The final details and requirements for the internal storm sewer system are subject to further review and requirements based on the final plat documentation and ultimate development of the adjacent roadways. The Development will be required to provide storm sewer service to the northeasterly adjacent Parcel #013-01. This parcel drains westerly to the Wescott Square development. The stub should be designed to handle a five year peak flow of approximately 4cfs. No preliminary erosion and sediment control plan was submitted for staff review. A detailed erosion and sediment control plan is required for staff review and approval prior to issuance of a grading permit or final plat approval. UTILITIES: Sanitary sewer service of sufficient depth and capacity to serve the site is readily available along Mike Collins Drive and Kost Road. The development will be required to provide an 8" sanitary sewer service stub to the northeasterly adjacent property and individual sanitary sewer services to each unit. Water main service of sufficient capacity and pressure is readily available along all four sides of the proposed development. The proposed internal water main system is subject to further review for fire demand requirements. The internal water main system as proposed does not adequately service all units. The development is required to provide an individual water service to each unit. STREETS/ACCESS/CIRCULATION: The development is proposing to take public street access from five locations along Mike Collins Drive and Kost Road. No direct access to Elrene Road is proposed. The development is proposing to provide street access to these centrally located units through the use of an internal private street system. The development is providing access to the northeasterly adjacent property. Mike Collins Drive is an existing 34' wide urban section roadway. Kost Road is an existing gravel surface roadway and is required to be upgraded to a 34' wide urban section with the appropriate storm sewer system. The easterly adjacent Elrene Road is an existing 24' wide bituminous rural section roadway. The upgrade of Elrene Road to a 44' to 48' urban section roadway will be required with this development. Council authorization of a public improvement to upgrade Kost Road and Elrene Road to the appropriate urban section are required prior to final plat approval. EASEMENTS/RIGHTS-OF-WAY/PERMITS: Easements will be required for all storm sewer lines in ponding areas, sanitary sewer lines and water mains. The depths and number of parallel lines will determine the required easement widths. Adequate right-of-way widths for Mike Collins Drive, Kost Road, and Elrene Road have been provided with the platting of the Wescott Hills Addition. The Dakota County Plat Commission is requiring a 60' half right-of-way and dedication of restricted access along the entire length of frontage of County State Aid Highway #28 (Yankee Doodle Road). All regulatory agency permits shall be acquired within the appropriate time frame as required by the affected agency. ASSESSMENTS: A search of available City information reveals no pending assessments of record. In accordance with special assessment policies in effect at this time, the following assessments are proposed as a condition of final plat approval: PROJ # DESCRIPTION 58 Lateral benefit trunk water main 58 Lateral benefit trunk sanitary sewer Future Trailway Future Yankee Doodle Road Upgrade Future Elrene Road Upgrade 120 Lateral benefit trunk storm sewer RATE $21.60/ff $15.85/ff $13.00/ff $90.20/ff $41.00/ff $26.00/ff TOTAL PROPOSED ASSESSMENT QUANTITY 854.54 1,321.83 AMOUNT $18,458 $20,951 854.54 $11,109 486.44 $43,877 293.10 $12,017 574.30 $14,932 $121.344 All final assessment obligations will be calculated based on the quantities and dimensions of the final plat and accordance with the rates in effect at the time of the final plat approval. CONDITIONS: WESCOTT SQUARE 1. These standard conditions of plat approval as adopted by Council action on September 15, 1987 shall be complied with: Al, Al, B2, B3, B4, Cl, C2, C3, C4, C5, Dl, El, F1, and Gl. 2. A cony of the townhouse bylaws shall be submitted to :he City Attorney for review. 3. The developer shall comply with all ordinance amendments approved on July 5, 1988 including exterior finish, garage size, and impervious surface coverage. 4, All `rash shall be contained in the garages until the 'ay i ckuo . 5. The drainage Swale along the southerly portion of Block 3 will not be allowed. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. The Development is required to submit engineering documentation for staff review and approval for the proposed retaining wall. The Development is required to contain ponding areas entirely within the boundaries of the Development. The Development is required to provide a 4 cfs storm sewer outlet and a sanitary sewer service stub to Parcel *013-01. The Development is required to provide individual sewer and water service to each proposed unit. Council authorization of a public improvement to provide the downstream storm sewer system and upgrade Kost and Elrene Roads to the appropriate urban section is required prior to final plat approval. STANDARD CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL A. Assessments 1. This development shall accept its additional assessment obligations as defined in the staff's report in accordance with the final plat dimensions and the rates in effect at the time of final plat approval. B. Easements and Rights -of -Way 1. This development shall dedicate 10' drainage and utility easements centered over all common lot lines and adjacent to private property or public right-of-way. 2. This development shall dedicate, provide, or financially guarantee its proportionate share of the acquisition costs of additional drainage, ponding, and utility easements as required by the alignment, depth, and storage capacity of all required public utilities and streets located beyond the boundaries of this plat or outside of dedicated public right-of-way as necessary to service this development. 3. This development shall dedicate all public right-of-way and temporary slope easements for ultimate development of adjacent roadways as required by the appropriate jurisdictional agency. 4. This development shall dedicate adequate drainage and ponding easements to incorporate the required high water elevation necessitated by City storm water storage volume requirements. C. Plans and Specifications 1. All public streets and utilities necessary to provide service to this development shall be designed by a registered professional engineer in accordance with City codes and engineering standards and policies, and approved by staff prior to final plat approval. 2. A detailed grading, drainage, erosion, and sediment control plan must be prepared in accordance with current City standards and approved by staff prior to final plat approval. 3. This development shall insure that all temporary dead end public streets shall have a cul-de-sac constructed in accordance with City engineering standards. 4. A detailed landscape plan shall be submitted on the proposed grading plan and approved by staff prior to the final plat approval. The financial guarantee shall be included in the Development Contract and not released until one year after the date of installation. STANDARD CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL PAGE TWO 5. All internal public and private streets shall be constructed within the required right-of-way in accordance with City design standards. D. Public Improvements 1. If any public improvements are to be installed under a City contract, the appropriate project must be approved by Council action prior to final plat approval. E. PerI.:its 1. his development shall be responsible for the acquisition of all regulatory agency permits in the time frame required by the affected agency. F. Parks Dedication 1. This development shall fulfull its parks dedication requirements as recommended by the Advisory Parks and Recreation Commission and approved by Council action. G. Other 1. All standard platting and zoning conditions shall be adhered to unless specifically granted a variance by Council action. Advisory Planning Commission City Council Approved: August 25, 1987 Sentember 15, 1987 Revised: LTS#2 STANDARD The following amendments to the Eagan City Code, Chapter 11, were APPROVED by the City Council on July 5, 1988. Section 11.03 (26) "Single Garage" has a minimum of 10 foot width and a minimum of 240 square feet. "Double Garage" has a minimum width of 20 feet and a minimum length of 22 feet. Section 11.20, Subdivision 6(c) Additional Setback for Height. In all R districts, all minimum required building setbacks as stated in Subdivision 6, Subdivision (A) of this section shall be increased by 3 feet for each 1 foot of height over 35 feet. Section 11.20, Subdivision 6 (h) In all R-3 and R-4 zones, at least fifty percent (50%) of any exterior building finish shall consist of a combination of materials which are non- combustible, non -degradable and maintenance free (for example, base brick, natural stone, glass, and aluminum siding) or those comparable in grade and quality. No exterior building finish shall be sheet aluminum, asbestos, iron, steel, corrugated aluminum or untreated block. Samples of exterior building materials shall be submitted with the application. Section 11.20, Subdivision 6 (i) Architectural Standards. In all R-3 and R-4 districts, architectural plans shall be prepared by a registered architect and include (a) elevations of all sides of the building; (b) dimensions of all structures; (c) location and screening of heating, air- conditioning and ventilation systems. All sides of all buildings shall be treated as a front with the same architectural treatment. Section 11.10, Subdivision 13(c) Multiple Dwellings, Including Townhouses, Apartments and Condominiums. 1. No detached garages shall be permitted. All garages shall be attached or underground. 2. On all buildings, at least one (1) enclosed or underground garage space per unit and at least one (1) outdoor parking space per unit shall be provided. •I I i ROAD I 1 1 'i1 : .,1, .., • "ILLS CARR/46'C — 1 \ - 14 ,---,---F,-.. -.,..,-. c ? '',---,,, ..--=,-a '''• -, ''''''''' c c''' 4-7e-sccr'',, „ ,--_-- :„,...- , ' A-st- 1 '- ''11 ... .- _,,-,--_,-, --,, -,,-_, A. -'-' t._.,__. .....,., ,- : --..- , , . ,.: - . 28 11' ' / 4-TG.1 CENTE8i7__j-- :7'1)1t18IAL P , IEbI ' h NOS . I CARRIAGE HILLS COURSE , HILLS 11 WESCOTT \d GARDEN I LOTS .--: i f-14.4411•141,, i,.t;----;; 1 — 11 . ! H I ! t ($.1- r m [ -11 I ;;)1411.1STRiA.1 It'Allic 11 -I N-0141117 1 1 1111 - '4 ' I ' /• - I ; CARRIAGE HILLS C.OL COURSE GOLF' '41 11,11 voE9corriLF-11- • GAnbER I LO DT -1 • • OC111.11 1 ,I , r.'14. 11 • • illrl!:211 1;',/—,1s,2 i - I 1 . Q 1- 1 , [ VICINITY MAP Tr;JI ... T71.9 1-,N... , _1,1,, - „ ri 4-j ..113 c• 2 >' ..< 1. l'illil 1-1.1 !pi; '7 ,'. -111:1 4 *flO Ili 0 133 1> MIND ADDITION I fOURTH ADDITION • 111 OWN,. !: 0.23. 13. 5 ! 0 4 1 1 0 0 0 — / 3 / ;‘, I ;.„ - \ . :: • / t . , . \ / Hi / / / . 1 __.': / = --/ I , I 1 i - 1 I t/ % I/ I3 I1 I I i a i ----- , 407144!. NOLIABOX3 8 o 07 It ELRENE ROAD M54M§§55NiMi- §MNN5§N§MMNW WAW. 3 1 1 . Mh§§5NMiNiNhNMiiNq§ B :at 8 8 8 :3:3 83 O CZN M Z m 0 Z R Z Cii cr) > 2 q 7:1 0 -< M > c (a) CD -- m cr) 0 z ;•,a >0 -,, m al 0 0 ml Km viva 31.1S 0 4- �.�.=",' lza2,C3 r d di , .1- (.0 m 01 o a 4, p n F a. N h f) 8 1 H Q d o 0 a 1 N N p- , o N eon • n in W uw fes.' 0 • u• az a< w 0 ,, .., ,.., , 'i,, , , / I(�( Ji,'r / /!,/� Cllr/l,l/�jli �� --_- _ _" / 1 11 1!) ( /r. %dr flu' llit I! \ 1\iA� i,„.,..,.___.:.„,_....,•_,,__,...., 1 J / /v / )1i�llif ilii I(\ it ``...�__ -�4 J',/ �`•�-- --�jj ,�/ •1 ill 1, , j _ _ ._____-: ---..---„,---_____,___-: .._ __ /h, J _ ,\\�}I'' 4}til/�`[] �il(f1/��11 /1 /��' // �� /. 1r1�� \ �'.PI' I�1 } :i,' __ itJlii ?J/ J l (� ,a\► i3rn✓_ -t Fiz, ` 11`_Ji j-_ f 4 % . 'Ce)'' ' '' k) _-_ // 1 f c1 1` / Il` / t / Jrlrff -- - /r^f f� i t 4, Ir awl \ f ; 1%Vf �.y3'..4 ,..., vr cc 1 t I' oc 11 • 1 "..Nkl3Sn6 4 _flfl 11.1 .a#N a`, \1 i• Mopµaav (luau 3 8 *IWaoroaa.,. 1— U) 1= 3 ktu o 0 CC MZ000 wO 001- o < de 0 0 (0 CQ. 0 CC 03 011 V O g • 04 0 co El '0 N ▪ st 0 (.' 2 >- (.3 cc ,a- . -6 ...t ...1 `ct• 1-11 cri 0) ,,,!-5 kJ xL//p.z LLI t ,, ilii,,,i1( z..• /// / , '‘ ./ //,'t / ''," ' I .. . ---', / 110\ 1-0 •----) ; ' ''''/ —1-7_--- ---- — ..... ..-• _....-. \- \ 0,-..`_,-_-_-_,-- ,',' ' ' A :-- -,- -‘,-- ='. -__:-/ - \ \ \ \ .--,-7 - - -- , '/, , I. t -.--.....-.....----- -- -- - - - • - - -_-_- z.--.-_- - ------ ..1. -• - J.4 . `i:ir mis -i • , • 1:- •-?- .4.- - '.?2• ,.. 1 :/...,...i t,' i _.........7;`, "--' • Z1ZE ;HOOT BOTAI4CAL HAIN' NOLUCIOY mow. 1-- z -J a. mislmorwmno.r COL11.10” NAGE a r \42salnl " 11'4 •• f: • - *. 2 0 cc 4 0 w 0 0 8 :4 0 0 a. cI 6 0 • .1( cc 0 0 4.1;17-• 4j3.-614-. 1;1 tt-!!itt--:•1 • —mosaimasensamiammiumasumr - t d 0 0 0 0 Z 0 a 4.4 cz 0(1 cc 2 00 cn CC 43 —A— .i.)=Olmiri "Dn . 4 • -1 -1 9 \;\;\ ‘'‘.0 I • t1 +1 0 a a 0 CD fu SITE DATA m 0 6 C (O l7 CO m � Q (n of 0 "f N h O 2 g a N • z g s! SSi=33tR::ii :7:A:L:S:S::eS:S:S;S,:77SS 44444445449§§4494§4449§44 t t t R i t t t RR R 11 x ffcaliixcl?5ccEiiE3 3:?Si.E:ii?<33�''.iE:z:I --944444 --5444449444444444444 -44499§444444449§44449 a i i 0 CL EXCEPTION . ..r .1r 0 i•••• Y .i 9N1113 - S R '-m rt, 44At, "it I � . ot, 9 oi• 10. O-• 0 • 0000-00 Or 0 0 0 •1 0 r IAHV A - t{pil1Oav HIHf10i 611TH 110092M CC Ara _ .mono . NO11100Y MK: 1311111 u00ff7M 1 9, 0 O z 0 vg 0 u 2 3 i s- o. a IC;NfTY MAP it ` t.1 11 l .I11 854.54 F.F. LATERAL BENEFIT WATER TRUNK 574.30 F.F. cc W Cly 2r�t� LL 0 I— Z 11 1— LL Z w J CC LIJ I— J O 0 0 0 k x 0 l_l 0 0 w z —J 1I, �"r o d 1 Ut t t R iRR co CO .:sc:c7 srlcsjri;:tzsa; t i Ir Cti .7:4:C:t].3::::cl:l777::t d 1 a 4444444444444444444444444 N N CV .- ry •a ^ ^ t t C Q R R Mia c?:'ziiiiiliM il;53 i?9iU3i33=i3:':7::1:3 z a `� (f' -444444 -4444444444444444444-N44444444444444NN44N4 N Z 5 o i i .71 c; �'-.� 1 ---► --ale au EXCEPTION .1, .11 0 0 WWII" MO sc-0111.= OE 9N9a13 west 7 .1F71 f 3 LY 3 2 3 3 3 a 3 • I, 0' 0' I= • 1 11 01.0 1 a r. M CC II1aav HLHnoi BQI111IH 11008a •RNta . H011I00v 0HIH1 8111H 11OQ8iM 1321.83 F.F. ccr Lu VJ/w1`'� J °a- } 8 Cc v Z W co r LL w z w m -J Q d w 1- J 1 z U 'TRAIL - 854.54 F.F. 11070 !; t L J SITE DATA ._T • GrCIVOLI 1 v a u t1' O t e t R ,S.a"Ij:1:S.1: 12 of ,,,. 32:Ott...... Stt;S1.127:3:3 9 • 455§55554§555455555555454 ' • p N N of O N • t t t 0 G Q } c _ fl3Jac!,SttE:t.i 3t.JJ...33.13..J.::c3 3 Q CO ..a o -4§444§ -§445§§4§554544544§5 -4§§4544455§§55554§4§5 N Z fj p 3a a EXCEPTION DMM:113, I iI rti7J r� o 3- 4 n180--1-"'"--7 6p1llaav Hi8nO 111H 110083M CC i,n vi.0 Tr cc HOIUOOY awn 971IH 110083M 1 U 0 a' 4 0 V LL LL co co v cc w V a 00cc w J 0 0 w w Z } um Bo gig ELRENE ROAD UPGRADE - 293.10 F.F. 11.31 12" -- I CARRIAGE HILLS (OLF :vCCrnTT_1 5:: W'ESCCT T GARDEN LOTS I 1 1iT7 • - { D0 I , �D 111-3 ,• • L` :;SUBJECT PARCEL city of eagan PUBLIC WORKS DE PARTMENT1 SANITARY SEWER MASTER PLAN approved : FIG#2 standard 1 plate : DP -11 856.0 864.4 1 w r-:. r._ IEP -3'3 876.3 E -c 877.2 W.) : 1) _ 24. N .. 48" CO.fD c 2B •DP-10-"'���- c. 848.0 DP -9' 860 0 858.3 8 • 8628 66 E -b • E -e 42"•E -_d i - ,. r.; •:.:-^--- E-� -.27 E f ��� 48' ..ice , EP -2 829.0 856.0 1-7 r� E-9� W Es CO T 1. CARRIAGE HILLS GOLF DP-=18SE ---- 873.0 '` 882.0 G:�1 ;..CE' ji ii �- -59 ,.... .s„�� 882.3._- _-JP-.81 �2 887. P --45�� 864.0 , 394.0'4 �-42 `- 2 879.7 97.3 : = 887.! j N JP- 60 �2'. 888. / . r •,-.•.1P-46 /�� t2!,35.-17'-, 2 tn E -h G::RDEN L 4 833!0 854.0; " ` JP 33 '<3. ;1832.0 city of eagan PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMEN STORM SEWER MASTER PLAN FIG#I standard plate 4: approved: 5/80.0 RI 18" . C.( t•-7. 8" 20u4 72.0 161 676/86.0 49.6/66.0 20 24" 63) . ^ • N % NN", (67) -0mA R '1;53.6/ 72.0 .41,0CITiON 43.3/604 2, aim mon amor 66 - • - 8'' CARRIAGE HILLS GCLF COURSE " GARDEN 16 2' 17.1/32. • 116" / H. LOTS MOM OIN/0 •46111111111BAk 11111111ez. 41111M aim Gaii* .41111M — COD AC ID 50.3/67.0 7' ‘•-•._2Y „4. —•-• r. SUBJECT PARCEL FIG4#3 city of eagan PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMEN WATER MASTER PLAN approved: standard plate 4: Page 16/PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES August 23, 1988 • stated an expansion in the other direction would move the proposed expansion further from the residential area. Chairman Pawlenty questioned what would be the results if the matter were deniea by the Planning Commission. The Commissioner stated that staff would have to quickly reassess other expansion methods. He further stated the capacity ana the EPA mandated problems. Member Trygg asked if they could return to the Planning Commission in 30 or 60 aays. Mr. Graves stated they coula explore other options ana he wouia rather have the matter continued. Mr. Voracek stated the problem would not be soivea in 30 aays. Mr. Miller stated the citizens did not want the expansion. Mr. Graves questioned the feelings of the other citizens in the City of Eagan. Mr. Miller stated the feasibility of other options snouia be explored. Mr. Merkley stated that citizens want a proffer operation, not tne direction of the expansion. Voracek moved, Garry seconded, the motion to close the public hearing and to deny tne request for a preliminary plat consisting of 87.83 acres for the expansion of the Seneca Water Treatment Plant located west of the Comanche Roaa in the west naif of Section 17 ana the east half of Section 18. Garry, Voracek, Pawlenty, Miller, and Merkley voted in favor; Trygg ana Graves voted against. Some of the reasons for the denial were as follows: 1. The developer should prove they are a good neighbor by taking care of the present 000r problem first before the expansion. 2. The developer cannot pinpoint the source of the odors; they should know the cause and the proportions. 3. The developer should explore the feasibility of expanding onto existing property. 4. The developer should have a solution for the smoke stack problem. S. MWCC should do their homework ana be prepared to address the Council concerns. WESCOTT SQUARE ADDITION - NEW HORIZON HOMES Chairman Pawlenty opened the public hearing regarding the preliminary plat of 9.83 R-3 (townhouses) zoned acres for 71 units located along Yankee Doodle Road ana Elrene Road in the Northeast Quarter- of Section 14. Assistant Planner Jim Sturm informea the Commission that at their July 26, 1988, meeting, the item has been continues unanimously for the following four reasons: 9 4-q Page 17/PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES August 23, 1988 1. To obtain a tree census regarding the location ana types of trees; 2. To review the playground issue regarding tot lots; 3. To review the issue regarding the open space and a reduction of the density; and 4. To review and clarify the ordinance question. Mr. Sturm stated a general tree census had been conducted and that oaks are found in the northern section of the property. He stated the applicant intends to modify the gracing plan or provide tree wells or retaining walls wherever possible. Mr. Sturm informed the Commission that the plat was reviewea by the Aavisory Parks ana Recreation Commission at its August 4, 1988, meeting ana wnile no lana dedication was requested, aaditional open space for some type of play equipment (tot lot) was recommended. Mr. Sturm stated there was a question regarding the ordinance requirement calling for 6,000 square feet per lot in the R-3 districts. He stated the individual lots do not meet that requirement, however, the overall density of the plat reflects that figure. He statea it could be platted in a condominium fashion where all of the open space is designated as an outlot. The inaividual lots are desirable since they could easily be sold for separate ownership. Sven Jensen, 3520 Westwind Road, stated he is concernea about the children in the neighborhood ana also the garbage which is being left. He suggested closing off trails and road to the public. Mr. Sturm stated Kost Road would be upgraded. Commission -member Trygg questioned if it would make it worse. Mr. Jensen stated it would not improve the matter. He suggested allowing local traffic only. Chairman Pawlenty stated it was a public road. Mr. Jensen again stated there was much litter. Commission -member Miller suggested he call the City staff. Chairman Pawlenty stated the staff ana the Commission appreciated his concern but they could not prevent it. He stated perhaps the Police Department should be contacted. Mr. Jensen stated he had assessment concerns. Mr. Sturm stated the Planning Commission did not handle assessments. Commission -member Voracek stated he was glad that the trees were being saved and that it was a significant improvement. He had questions regarding the tot lot and what happened to it. Mr. Sturm stated it would depend on how the property was platted. He stated an outlot for such a use might have to be created. Mr. Voracek questioned if children would run across the other lots. The aeveloper stated that individual lots are being proposed so single family's Page 18/PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES August 23, 1988 detached units could be created. The tot lot would be created by easement and the ByLaws woula spell out the peaestrian rules. Member Voracek questionea if individuals could do gardening in the area. Mr. Sturm stated gardening would be coverea by the Homeowner's Association regulations. Member Merkley stated he telt there was not enough green space and that a unit should be eliminated. Member Graves questionea if the exterior met guidelines. Mr. Sturm stated there would be discussion before the Council meeting to clarify the ordinance. He stated the brick and glass was an attempt to upgrade the appearance. Mr. Graves questionea the double garage variance. Mr. Sturm stated the matter had been resolved. Mr. Graves questioned the storm sewer resolution. Mr. Foertsch stated it must be satisfied with the feasibility report. Mr. Graves stated he felt the development was pushing its limits and requested more open space. Chairman Pawlenty concurrea and statea there should be an answer on the present option for the Council. Merkley moved, Voracek seconded, the motion to approve a preliminary plat of 9.83 R-3 (townhouses) zoned acres for 71 units located along Yankee Doodle Road and Elrene Road in the Northeast Quarter of Section 14 (Wescott Square Addition), subject to the following conditions: 1. These standard conditions of plat approval as adopted by Council action on September 15, 1987, shall be compliea with: Al, B1, B2, B3, B4, Cl, C2, C3, C4, C5, D1, El, Fl, ana G1 . 2. A copy of the townhouse bylaws shall be submitted to the City Attorney for review. 3. The developer shall comply with all ordinance amendments approved on July 5, 1988 including exterior finish, garage size, ana impervious surface coverage. 4. All trash shall be contained in the garages until the day of pickup. 5. The drainage swale along the southerly portion of.Block 3 will not be allowed. 6. The Development is required to submit engineering documentation for staff review and approval for the proposed retaining wall. 7.The Development is required to contain ponding areas entirely within the boundaries of the Development. 8. The Development is required to provide a 4 cfs storm sewer outlet and a sanitary sewer service stub to Parcel #013-01. a-\s\A Page 19/PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES August 23, 1988 9. The Development is required to provide individual sewer and water service to each proposed unit. 10. Council authorization of a public improvement to provide the downstream storm sewer system and upgrade Kost ana Elrene Roads to the appropriate urban section is required prior to final Plat approval. All voted in favor. COMMMISSION DISCUSSION Member Garry apologized for arriving late to tne meeting ana questioned Item F or the agenaa regarding the ordinance amendment to Chapters 11 and 13. He stated ne had receivea nis material late. He also questioned why there was no approval of tne minutes at the meeting. City Planner Dale Runkle reviewed the retail study with the Commission. Member Merkley suggested starting the Planning meetings at 6:30 p.m. Mr. Garry stated he would have a problem with a 6:30 start time. Mr. Graves suggested meeting two nights a month. Chairman Pawlenty suggested changing the format for the presentation in the future with no rebuttal from either side. Mr. Voracek suggested allowing a response to each question as it arises. Mr. Graves stated he thought that was unfair. Mr. Garry agreed with Chairman Pawlenty's approach. The matter regarding the procedure was continued for further discussion. ADJOURNMENT Voracek moved, Trygg seconded, the motion to continue Items A, B, C, D, E, F and G under New Business until a Special Advisory Planning Commission meeting on August 30, 1988, and further moved to adjourn the meeting at 1:15 a.m. All votea in favor. Secretary - Advisory Planning Commission .c2 7 MEMORANDUM TO: TOM HEDGES, CITY ADMINISTRATOR HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL ,/FROM: KEN VRAA, DIRECTOR OF PARKS & RECREATION DATE: SEPTEMBER 2, 1988 RE: WESCOTT SQUARE ADDITION - ADVISORY COMMISSION RECOMMENDATIONS The Advisory Commission reviewed the proposed Wescott Square Addition, both at its August and its September 1st Commission meeting. The developer was present at the September 1st meeting to explain how the development would attempt to meet some of the open space and recreational needs of this development. The developer explained that he was removing one building location and providing approximately 4,000 Sq.Ft., which was intended to provide the option for recreational amenities. The developer explained a gazebo would be installed. He indicated that he felt the owners would probably be empty nesters and playground equipment may not be necessary, but that option for providing this would remain open and left up to the Homeowners Association. After review by the Advisory Commission of the revised plat, the Commission recommended approval of the plat, as shown, to the City Council, including (a) a cash dedication requirement, (b) a five foot sidewalk on Lone Oak Road, and (c) two sand areas, one playground structure, open space and gazebo be provided. KV/bls 1 4-(8 Agenda Information Memo September 6, 1988, City Council Meeting MODEL HOME PERMIT/WOODLANDS 2ND ADDITION M. Model Home Permit for Lot 7, Block 1, Woodlands 2nd Addition - Mr. Howard Kyllo of Robert Engstrom Associates is requesting a model home permit in the Woodlands 2nd Addition, specifically, Lot 7, B ock 1. Please refer to the attached memo enclosed on pages 0 through ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny a model home permit for Lot 7, Block 1, Woodlands 2nd Addition as presented. MEMO TO: TOM HEDGES, CITY ADMINISTRATOR FROM: JIM STURM, PLANNER 1/LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT DATE: SEPTEMBER 1, 1988 RE: MODEL HOME PERMIT On August 30th I received a request from Howard Kyllo of Robert Engstrom Associates for a model home permit in the Woodlands 2nd Addition. The specific lot is Lot 7, Block 1, and the value of the home will be over $300,000. To date, nearly half of the lots in the Woodland Addition have been sold. The Woodlands 2nd Addition incorporates a small triangular piece in the pending Suncrest Addition. Since Suncrest has not received preliminary plat approval (it is scheduled for the September 19 City Council meeting), that small piece on the east side of the Williams Bros. pipeline cannot be incorporated into the Woodlands 2nd Addition final plat. No problems with the transaction are anticipated since that area is basically useless to the Suncrest plat. I reviewed this permit request with the Engineering Department and they did not have any concerns with the final plat for the Woodlands 2nd Addition. This permit should be subject to the model home provisions listed in Chapter 13. JS/js CC: Steve Hanson, Asst. Building Official � Sb Agenda Information Memo September 6, 1988, City Council Meeting ADDITIONAL ITEMS DISTRIBUTION/1988 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE A. Distribution of 1988 Comprehensive Plan Update/Revision- Sanitary Sewer Collection System/Water Supply, Storage & Distribution System --In accordance with past Council direction and budgetary allocations, the consulting engineering firm of Bonestroo, Rosene, Anderlik & Assoc., Inc. has completed a most recent revision and update to the above -referenced Comprehensive Plans for our sanitary sewer and water infrastructure system. A copy of each report is being provided to the City Council for their information and review with formal Council review and approval scheduled for the October 6th Council meeting. If any Council member would like to discuss any aspect of these reports in specific detail or would like an informal presentation regarding their contents, the Public Works Director will be happy to respond to those requests. An executive summary/synopsis will be forwarded to the City Council in the near future identifying any significant changes from the previous comprehensive plans or significant impacts on existing or future policy requirements. There is no action to be considered on this item. MEMO TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCILMEMBERS FROM: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES DATE: SEPTEMBER 1, 1988 SUBJECT: INFORMATIVE SENIOR HOUSING UPDATE The ad hoc committee to review senior housing locations has met and for a summary of their findings and action, refer to a memo prepared by the City Planner, referenced as page(s)]SS-. S7 FREEWAY ZONING UPDATE The City Planner and our planning consultant, John Voss, have continued to address freeway zoning standards and r a status report, refer to a memo from Dale enclosed on page d HILLCREST AND TWIN VIEW MANOR NEIGHBORHOODS The City Administrator has been communicating with several residents of the Hillcrest and Twin View Manor neighborhoods regarding the feasibility of an access road through the Fairway Hills project to Cliff Road. Currently, those neighborhoods travel south on Pilot Knob Road to 126th Street, west to Johnny Cake Ridge Road and north to Eagan. The Dakota County engineer is reconsidering and has expressed a willingness to participate with the City and Fairway Hills Development to either build a temporary access road through that development or utilize an existing public right-of-way through the Fairway Hills neighborhood that intersects with Pilot Knob Road. The City Administrator has asked that the Physical Development Director and County Highway Engineer have a neighborhood meeting to discuss the project in further detail with those neighborhoods. Mr. Gary Erickson has assured the City Administrator that a meeting will be scheduled at Sacajawea sometime in the next week. HOUSING REVENUE BOND APPLICATION/STRATFORD OAKS APARTMENTS The City Administrator has received a letter from the Dakota County HRA by D.H. Gustafson Company requesting the Dakota County HRA to issue housing revenue bonds for the Stratford Oaks Apartment complex. They have not requested tax increment assistance from the HRA. The project is proposed at the southwest corner of Thomas Lake Road and Diffley and will consist of approximately 348 units of rental housing. The Dakota County HRA would like some brief discussion as to whether the City Council would consider multi -family housing revenue bonds for an apartment complex. The City Administrator will address this item at the end of Tuesday's meeting. S3 COMMUNITY CENTER/CITIZENS COMMITTEE The City Council, Parks Advisory Commission and City staff have discussed the necessity and importance of appointing a task force/community center reaction committee to work on reviewing preliminary planning issues relative to the community center proposal. As a part of the community center update in the City wide newsletter that will come out in mid-September, there is a request for a volunteer citizens committee to be formed; appointments to be made by the City Council. A copy of that portion of the newsletter is enclosed on page,:25;1 /S/ Thomas L. Hedges City Administrator MEMORANDUM TO: TOM HEDGES, CITY ADMINISTRATOR FROM: DALE RUNKLE, CITY PLANNER DATE: SEPTEMBER 1, 1988 SUBJECT: SENIOR HOUSING SITE A meeting of the Ad -Hoc Senior Housing Site Selection Committee was held on Agust 16,1988. The purpose of this meeting was to reduce the number of possible sites from the five chosen at the joint City Council -Advisory Planning Commission Meeting to two. The first site chosen was the 23 acre site,located on the corner of Cliff Road and Rahn Road in the southeast 1/4 of section 30. The site is presently zoned A (agricultural). The second site selected by the committee is located along Rahn Road just north of Cliff Road in the southwest 1/4 of section 29. The site is located within the Cliff Lake Galleria develop- ment.There are two possible lots under consideration within this site. They are Outlot C and Outlot D. Outlot C consists of 10 acres and Outlot D consists of 12 acres and both are zoned R- 4(multiple). The Council is being asked to examine the two final sites proposed by the Senior Site Selection Committee. It is suggested that the City Council authorize the Dakota County HRA to start their environmental reviews and process to purchase the site. I would be happy to discuss any issues or problems the City Council may have regarding the sites. ass yrfl 11 CfOAR1 ',POND PARK DIY�% -7/ W A NK K EO•M JN 4CY Hn 1 .�1I wn � l Ali wr,C/ ! 4 yraFA-t, 44. asp 17:r1671-1 I_J. rioese ---1141-1. 11G1 Os -7 MEMO TO: THOMAS L HEDGES, CITY ADMINISTRATOR FROM: DALE C RUNKLE, CITY PLANNER DATE: SEPTEMBER 2, 1988 SUBJECT: UPDATE ON FREEWAY ZONING The City Council made suggestions regarding the freeway zoning district at a July 12, 1988 meeting. Staff reviewed the comments and has discussed this item with the Developers Task Force. The task force is looking at the potential to re-evaluate or reconstruct the freeway zoning district to an overlay zoning district which could, in fact, be applied to all freeway frontage in the City of Eagan. The freeway zoning district was considered in order to create a new district which would only allow certain uses in certain locations throughout the City of Eagan. This approach would require rezoning of specific parcels to a freeway district and would regulate development on these parcels in regard to use and type of development. It would be very difficult to zone the entire length or large tracts of land along the freeway with this type of zoning district. At the July 12 meeting, it was staff's understanding that the direction was to relook at the zoning ordinance and come up with something that would be uniform along the freeway corridors. In this analysis, staff would recommend an overlay zone which could be applied to all frontage along the freeway corridors and would include performance standards such as landscaping, building materials, and size of parcel development. These performance standards would provide a well-planned, high- quality image which the City is trying to establish along all of the freeways. This overlay zone would not restrict the use which is already governed by the zoning district; it would only attempt to establish performance standards and try to restrict some of the undesirable uses such as outside storage and other uses which would detract from the appearance. Staff is in the process of analyzing and inventorying all of the undeveloped parcels along the freeway corridors to see how much of the area along the freeway would be impacted by the overlay zoning district. Before staff gets too far into this inventory analysis, we would like to get the City Council's input on this type of approach versus the freeway zoning district. If this approach seems acceptable to the City Council, we can probably implement this overlay zone by the end of the year. If you have any questions, please contact me. �Ij 4 '� 1141 ( j1 - City Planner DCR/mc CITY OF EAGAN 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55122 SEPTEMBER 1988 Volume 11 No. 3 Phone: 454-8100 TIIE LONE OAK TREE....TIIE SYMBOL OF STRENGTH AND GROWTH IN OUR COMNIUNITY COMMUNITY CENTER PLANS ADVANCE During the last six months, planning for a future community center for the City of Eagan took a major step forward as the Advisory Parks and Recreation Com- mission's preliminary study was completed, after nearly thirteen months of effort, with a recommendation to proceed to the next study phase. The City has since hired an architectural firm that has previously planned a number of recreation facilities, to do a site, space and cost analysis for a possible community center. Recently, the firm completed its review of the proposed com- munity center campus site. This site is located on land already owned by the City which is just south of the present Municipal Center on Pilot Knob Road. The firm's analysis of this site, i.e., soils, access, circulation, size, etc., con- firmed the site's adequacy to meet the needs of a community center building. The architects will be using the results of the community survey taken earlier by Decision Resources, Incorporated as a guide to the planning of the future building. Volunteer Citizens Committee to be formed. The Eagan City Council is now seeking citizens who niay wish to serve on a task force/community center reaction committee to work with the Advisory Parks & Recreation Commission, staff and the architect in reviewing preliminary plan- ning issues. The committee is to be comprised of a broad and diverse group of in- dividuals representing various geographical areas of the City, as well as different age groups, interests and occupations. Residents wishing to serve on the committee should direct a letter of interest to the City Administrator, at 3830 Pilot Knob Road, Eagan, MN 55122. A brief background statement, qualifications, and reasons why the individual is seeking the appointment should be included. Appointments will be made by the City Council. The committee work will extend until February 1989. For additional information concerning the role and responsibility of the com- mittee or the proposed community center, interested residents should contact the Director of Parks & Recreation, Ken Vraa, at 454-8100. INSIDE Election Information 1989 City Of Eagan Budget Cable Television Corner.. 4 Aircraft Noise 4 Library News 6 Curbside Recycling 7 Fall Recreation Programs 9 TDD TELEPHONE The City of Eagan has a Telephone Device for the Deaf (TDD) which can be accessed by calling 454- 8100. City personnel recently took part in a training session to properly handle TDD calls. The porta printer, which provides the means of com- munication, is "user friendly" and Eagan receptionists can respond to questions with a minimum of delay. Eagan residents who have TDD phones are encouraged to call City Of- fices for community information. CITY OF EAGAN Mayor: Vic Ellison Councilmembers: Thomas Egan Dave Gustafson Pam McCrea Ted Wachter police department JAY M.BERiHE Chief of Police PATRICK J. GEAGAN mministranre coon city of ecigcin ITNN ��N 3830 Pilot Knob Road VIC ETON Eagan, Minnesota 55122 Mayo( Phone: (612) 454-3900 August 17, 1988 TO: Patrick Geagan, Captain FROM: John Stevenson, Sergeant SUBJECT: APPLICATION FOR LIQUOR LICENSE ON JOSEPH HARKER THOMAS EGAN DAVID K. GUSTAFSON PAMELA MCCREA THEODORE WACHTER Cance Members THOMAS HEDGES OvAdminemtor EUGENE VAN OVERBEKE I reviewed the application and contacted Mr. Harker. Mr. Harker has been named the new manager for the La- Fonda's Restaurant. He states that he has no interest financially in LaFonda's Restaurant or any other res- taurant or establishment that serves alcohol. He stated that he has worked around food and beverage in restaurants for quite a few years and has never had a problem as far as any liquor law violations are con- cerned with his places of employment. One discrepancy on his application was his lack of references and he stated that was because he does not know anyone who lives in Dakota County and cannot give the name of a reference who does. He went on to state that I could contact one of the following people who are not Dakota County references but are never the less references for him. One is a Tom Willett who lives at 5809 Beard Ave. So. in Edina and his phone number is 922-1275. The second would be Bill Ankeny whose phone number is 341- 1233 and who is from Minneapolis. The third would be a Dan Atkins who lives in Edina and his phone numbers are 936-9810 or 726-8605. Local checks were run, warrant checks and state checks were run, as well as the following agencies were con- tacted: Edina Police Dept., Bloomington P.D., Minneap- olis P.D., Millard Nebraska P.D., Omaha Nebraska P.D., Boise Idaho P.D., Helena Montana P.D., Hennepin County and Ramsey County. The following information was ob- tained from these checks. The first item that was uncovered was an arrest for driving under while intoxicated from 9/27/79 which took place at the Sheriff's Office in Boise Idaho. Mr. Harker's Minnesota driver's license showed that he has three minor violations involving speed and illegal lane use and illegal turn and one action that involved a sus - THE LONE OAK TREE.. THE SYMBOL OF STRENGTH AND GROWTH IN OUR COMMUNITY caty Celt Page 2 pension because of a no-fault insurance accident. The last information that was discovered during the course of this in- vestigation was a warrant from the Hennepin County Sheriff's Office that is still currently active and that is a petty misdemeanor warrant for overtime parking. I have not had an opportunity to advise Mr. Harker of this active warrant as of yet. I find no other information that would preclude Mr. Harker from approval on this liquor license application. 110Y S/kg CITY OF EAGAN 3830 PILOT KNOB ROAD EAGAN, MINNESOTA 55122 Part II — PERSONAL INFORMATION DIRECTIONS: This foam must be filled out by EACH partner, by EACH manager, p who by co tined ownership or control owner, person of 57.. DATE: Z-tk Ly 15 3 19 1. TRUE NAME: HA R R P LAST, 2. RESIDENT ADDRESS: ith typewriter or by printing in ink by the sole r or other agent in charge of the premises, by EACH has an interest in a corporation or association in excess LS-813~NC3 STREET FIRST, E.4R-DAv&.So EEO i e/A ) rl1 N�S/� SQT.4 CITY STATE MIDDLE cO ? (/ ME ME ONE s / 10 ZIP l?) 413.2-5-4-(// BUS ESS PHONE NS /� Z ZIP nO.A/TA A( ' 3. BUSINESS ADDRESS: 36:4;k5---SIELEY STREET 4. PLACE OF BIRTH: 5. DATE OF BIRTH: F4rAN CITY } Qa21E MA/gi CITY t A -Y MONTH / l/A0VE-SOTA- STATE 40.44.-r (T/ COUNTY STATE 7 1 I 9,-51DAY 1 YEAR 6. U.S. CITIZEN? Yes V No NATURALIZED? Yes No If yes, give date and place: 7. If you have ever used or been known by a name or names other than the true name given in #1 above, list such name(s) and information concerning dates and places names have been used: NAME(S) DATES, PLACES CIRCUMSTANCES V 8. MARITAL. STATUS: SINGLE MARRIED WIDOWED DIVORCED SEPARATED 9. If married, true name place and date of birth and residence address of spouse: TRUE NAME: Kei- HRY/v ANV fr1gk'E�QT/"t4'C t.2oj /44/9 Ca0'6) 1.)ffSE / ltct-orrar/ PLACE AND DATE)OF BIRTH � 1� - E�4R,QA (j F, SO. En 1Af�4' 1441N/Y_.ESO 7--,t- la -� RESIDENCE ADDRESS: STREET,ZITY,STATE,ZIP CODE 10. Address(es) at which you have lived during preceding ten years. (Begin with present or last address and work back) Number and Street City and State Dates 5-813 - A..An A U E•t)i At 4 A,z, S�f33 �iPEsi:w% '7 fli Lc 4 e,0j A) 3 yeAsK4-- 3 /6Q s /g3 n (30 c sa: ) c`) — 517 G — 3 /8 a-- 4 . . Address(es) at which your spouse has lived during preceding ten years. (Begin with present or last address and work back) Number and Street 1813- B A .r �•t4 - (o,tcrf srd City and State Dates AvEtoce? Ai,_ S.183_ -- PI< - H 1*. 4hir dNA — ' 177 s/83 . Kind, name and location of every business or occupation you have been engaged in during the preceding ten years. (Begin with present or last address and work back) Business or Occupation Street Address,City,State Nature of Business or p Occupation q'�fC+CO�j- pcJP 12.4,E lA4/4ti. i?) 3coG -51st_€ v ,1c,nc,ci,1L HLoy; FAry4Ai; eiNS`.S/1..'RF`iAl` Ce (34) _C . PET- 3g'✓C.e.a r.A sl./IAegfO s -Lii , -A MN's'A'an-1S�5T,1A,.... )At1.' A✓,4rICKA�IReM 66.E ULj NN. FteO'*-Ce 4 S4 C$�<-. ce Izz,a /luI a a-AM>i CA- Fe',S<1--bAurd-0r-,nt�.z+l1�[{-, `FcDe:fl 4- L�,evER.4� c SA`c S Lki.KHe_ c- v r -e •, .-+.rGeCC ✓aNP,vT C &- '-r ',�-..,� ISC, i I Z0p. ind, name and location of every business' or occupation your spouse has been engaged in during the preceding ten years. (Begin with present or last one and work back) Q. Business or Occupation 1-1 x77-0 ^! Street Address,City,State Nature of Business or Occupation - :S4 -4 .E1 o -F 5rocrCs f- FA MI Ly ( u ,4( S >; s-/ Eric E 7).44V 4 1_ for the preceding ten FAIL -e T4(a tn/cern/rER,) HE VA Al0MrAw.4 Names and addresses of your employers and partners, if any, years. (Begin with present or last one and work back) NAMES:Partners or Employers Street Address,City,State ol,,,r -J-Arn'5 Arc, ) -' r)F. uu• I ) Co o ICa !Jt i'%ARRco r��Ncsrl.vr�, � sr.P4-L M iron/ 4" -Al s ,.( S) P, zz •a Htt7" C 's&---)So.4+40 �� M•,,n/�aa•as KA TN21Y QoLsx.) lt4140 ✓ Dates /RS"— 3/ /82 --4.9 - 3G78Z Names and addresses of your spouse's employers and partners, if any, for the preceding ten years. (Begin with present or last one and work back) NAMES:Partners or Employers Street Address,City,State Dates FAeo 1 `/ Th4(1iIAi( C[`^.✓rF.# blEALEA4.4) M,'T7YTA )'/4 /< ELL'/ S E R LC S f -I � �.E�.4 /1/i49,+." Have you, your spouse, or child of either of you, ever been conic ed of any felony, crime or violation of any ordinance, other than traffic? Yes No2\ If yes, give information as to the time, place and offense for which convicted: Have you, your spouse, or a been engaged as an employee tavern or other business of If Yes, give information as parent, brother, sister or child of either of you, ever or in operating a saloon, hotel, restaurant, cafe, a similar nature? Yes No to the time, place and length -of time. P -2- 130 18. Have you ever been in military service? YesXNo If Yes, was discharge(s) ever other than honorable? Yes No (upon request, you may be required to exhibit all discharges.) 19. Names, residence address, business address and telephone numbers who is engaged -in Minnesota intoxicating liquor and who cousin, whether of whole or is a brother-in-law or 1. Fu11 Name of each person in the business of selling,manufacturing or distributing is nearer of kin to you or your spouse than a second law, who half blood, computed by the you who is a sister-in-law of or Residence address Business Address rules of civil your spouse. Relationship Phone Phone or Full Name Residence Address Relationship Phone Business Address Phone 20. Are you a manufacturer or wholesaler of intoxicating liquor or interested direc ' or indirectly in the ownership or operation of any such business: Yes No 21. Are you directly or indirectly interested in other establishments in the 'ty of Eagan to which a license of the same kind has been issued? Yes No 22. Are you the spouse of a person who would be ineligible for a license? Yes No \� 23. What is the amount of investment that you will have in the business, including building, premises, fixtures, furniture, stock in trade, etc., and what was the source of such money? 24. Have you had any interest in any previous intoxicating liquor license that was revoked, suspended or not renewed? Yes No?�If yes, explain in detail. 25. Have you ever individually, or with others, made application in any municipality for an intoxicating liquor license and had such application denied? YesNo.if so, where and what were conditions of denial? 26. Name, reside residents or fina to th N business address and telephone numbers of three persons, of good moral character, not related to the applicant in the premises or business, who ma •e referred to as Dakota County applicant's character. HA- - FS -To 4= scAlb ESIDENCE ADDRESS Street SINESS ADDRESS NAME Rk‹ RESIDENCE ADDRESS BUSINESS ADDRESS Street Street Street NAME Rk c< !" � �02.. N MALE R Al))4:ity-State-Zip City -State -Zip City -State -Zip City -State -Zip PHONE PHONE PHONE PHONE RESIDENCE ADDRESS BUSINESS ADDRESS eet City -S to -Zip Street City -State -Zip PHONE PHONE } STATE OF ss. • COUNTY OF ) Jcse.pN I EeL. HAICKEQ ,being first duly sworn upon his/her oath, deposes and says that he/she is the person who has executed the above application'and that the statements made therein are true of his/her own knowledgend belief. Subscribed and sw o before -this 0-i day of� ,191 . r,r••MA.AMMty mvvvyvtiR^mAAAMM• ,..';',:N JUM T H A.. itAi t S ; pi�Tr:.n" P'1 -1.1C • M:k1HEEOT4 3 $4'' L- Y.=':iiu:NI COIU:vTi• My Corr,°s.::3n Eroires Jun. 10. 1983 ry vuwo v vw wvwvWwwwwwwv+ ary Public, commission expires County Gq -/' 190/ 9-11-87 CITY OF EAGAN CONSENT FOR THE RELEASE OF INFORMATION To SEP If DA"' /E[r I 4AKEi2 (name of individual authorizing release) authorize the Eagan Police Department to disclose to the Eagan City Administrator and the Eagan City Council the following information: all information collected as a result of the background investigation done for the purpose of evaluating the attached liquor license application. I understand chat failure to provide this release will result in a denial of my application. I understand that my records are protected under state and/or federal privacy laws and cannot be disclosed without my written consent unless otherwise provided for by state or federal law. I also understand that I may revoke chis consent at any time except to the extent that action has been taken in reliance on it and that in any event, this consent expires automatically as described below. Specification of the date, event, or condition upon which this consent expires 2c 1 t88 (expiration Executed this :Q day of 3ikk y , l9ess • 4.9'4') k.)"4- (N7arignature of individual authorizing release) a AAMM/'MMAx 4.lq::4 � JUG'?H A. KALIAUS lrtlry PLUM• M:NN OTA HEN E?:is; COUNTY My Corrm.s;:an E,pires Jun. 10, 1989 r wvwwww x (seal) MINUTES OF REGULAR_.MEETING.OF THE EAGAN CITY COUNCIL • ;E GAN,•• 40040OTA S•EPfi.HB•ER 6,-1988 A regular meeting of the Eagan City Council was held on Tuesday, September 6, 1988, at 6:30 p.m. at the Eagan Municipal Center. Present were Mayor Vic Ellison and Councilmembers Wachter, Egan, Gustafson and McCrea. Also present were City Administrator Tom Hedges, City Engineer Tom -Colbert, City Planner Dale Runkle and City Attorney James Sheldon. • • AGENDA Wachter moved, Gustafson• gooOz dee.,. the motion to approve the agenda as presented. All voted in favor.' MINUTES Upon motion by Egan, seconded by Wachter, it was resolved that the minutes for the August 16, 198t4'0gular meeting be approved as presented. All voted in favor... . CONTRACT 87-2, FINAL PAYMENT, HARD::COURT CONSTRUCTION/MISCELLANEOUS PARKS .• City Administrator Tom Hedges inf•Oined the Council that the final payment and change order number 3 were in order for consideration for improvement Contract 87-2. The contract consists of various construction of tennis and hard court play areas at 15 parks. The Parks and Recreation staff, after their review, found that Finley Brothers Enterprises had completed all work in accordance with the contract documents. The final..•.: ymeht .:a count is $11,408.05. Mr. Hedges stated that include.d ih-t4cPfillai payment was a recommendation by the staff for a change •:;tder hiber 3 in the amount of $1,171.50 which consists of a number of materials and labor spread through seven parks. He stated moet:'of the: changes involved the hauling of excessive soil, installati i1 .5f.•: •.•..gate .•or additional sodding and top soil. Councilmember Wachter questioned how the City knew the number of loads which had been removed. Parks and Recreation Director Ken Vraa stated that the City conducts inactions to insure accuracy. Gustafson moved, Wachtr'•:,secon•ae:�f.:. the motion to approve improvement Contract 87-2 Or final patient and change order number 3 for the total amount of $11.008.05 and•'fhat the City authorize final acceptance for perpetual te:a.:ntenance. 41 voted in favor. CONTRACT 87-13, FINAL PAYM4UT* •SR 'BUILDINGS/MISCELLANEOUS PARKS City Administrator T.O.m Hedges informed the Council that final payment and an addition ti -'change order number 1 in the amount of $4,576.00 were in order for consideration. He stated City staff, after their review, had found that M. G. Astleford had completed all work in accordance with the contract documents. The final payment amount is $15,583.00, which includes a recommendation for change order number 1. He stated the change order included additional wiring, an adjustment of the har:cvare allowance, a change in the light switching of the muiti-purpose room and some additional tile in the men's locker and toile. area:for Blue Cross/Blue Shield park building and to locate, excavate and install extra sanitary and water service, along with some ilii o:z• l,e•0t:ie::o4i changes at the Quarry Park shelter building. Councilmember Wachter questioned if the change order should be a separate motion. Mr. Hedges stated the Council could approve both matters with one motion. Wachter moved, Gustafson secc41000, the motion to approve improvement Contract 87-13 fay.e final payment and change order number 1 for the total amount of $154.583.00 and that the City authorize final acceptance got: _perpetual maintenance. All voted in favor. ACCEPT RESIGNATION/APPOINT REPLACEMENT/WATER QUALITY MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE Public Works Director Tom Colbert stated that Doug Wilcox had informed him that he had recently relocated out-of-state and could no longer serve on the Water Quality Managegnent Committee. Mr. Colbert stated the vacancy should lie: ; .x•ed W.:C*uncil action. Mr. Colbert stated the Council had recel»ed ba:c:kground information for those citizens who had previously expressed an interest in the Water Quality Management Committee but Were not selected.. He further stated that applications had been recei.:i. by new citizens who had expressea an interest in the position::a d :Cii:Unii1 'had received copies of their applications. Mr. Colbert presented 'the Council with a letter from Barb Agne stating she had an interest in being appointed to the committee (copy of letter from Barb Agne attached to minutes as Exhibit "A") . Mr. Colbert informed the Council of the following options which were available: 1. Appoint the alterna:t$. (Richard..:tarr) to a full committee member. 2. Appoint a new citig:eh as a.. ull,. Committee member. 3. Fill the vacancy with -the alternate with no subsequent appointments. -2- Councilmember Wachter .:#a:t:d: h:*: Matter should be conducted by ballot. City Administrator•. Tom Hedges handed out the ballots to the Council and explained the Appointment process. He further stated that ballots were public inform'a'tion. After the return of the ballots to Mr. Hedges, Mr. Hedges stated that Dick Starr was appointed by a majority of the votes. The Council then voted for an alternate. Mr. Hedges stated that Karl M. Heine had received :the majority of the votes for the alternate position. Councilmember McCrea stated she felt the City should encourage more women to apply for the. ,mmi:tt�e. Gustafson moved, Wachter seconded, the motion to accept the resignation of Doug Wilcox from the Water Quality Management Committee and appoint Richard Starr as his replacement on the committee, and appoint Karl M. Heine as the alternate on the committee. All voted in favor. HILLCREST AND TWIN VIP.' AI:NEIGHBORHOODS/ACCESS ROAD City Administrator Tom Hedges mated he had been communicating with several residents of the il:i•I•cr:e.s.t and Twin View Manor neighborhoods regarding the feasib•iflty :of an access road through the Fairway Hills project to Cliff Road. 114..stated that currently those neighborhoods travel south on Pilot Knob Road to 126th Street, west to Johnny Cake Ridge Road and north to Eagan. The Dakota County engineer is reconsidering and had expressed a willingness to participate with the City and Fairway Hills development to either build a temporary access road .through .that development or utilize an existing public right-of-way t u ou0.:the• Fairway Hills neighborhood that intersects with Pilot {hob 044. Mr. Hedges stated a neighborhood meeting had bed•n conducted and the residents stated they were concerned regarding public safety. Mr. Hedges stated the City had looked for an agreement :betwc00.the City, the County and the developer. The County had iar:r:pt : e4 a:ri:Qthor access road to the north. He stated the contractor had concerns regarding the safety of the access. Mr. Hedges stated the neighboring residents and the City are dissatisfied and want a permanent road. Mr. Hedges further stated the concerns were who would pay and also who would be liable. He stated the County would contribute 504;.• • A neighborhood spokesmaxi.•reiterate:4 the neighbors concerns to the Council. He stated they •were concer:ri:ad more about the safety than the convenience. He thanked•.ivlr. Hedges for his presentation. Mayor Ellison question eti: Che' ca t. : ?ublic Works Director Tom Colbert stated the cost wod• 1: r•uti••app oximately $4,000.00. Mayor Ellison questioned if the County would pick up one-half of the cost. -3- Mr. Colbert stated yes and. e.xp .atA0.d: the access construction procedure to the Council. • Councilmember Wachter q uestioned if the contractor was currently keeping the access open. Mt'. Colbert stated not at that location. Mr. Wachter asked if a caterpillar was present at all times. Mr. Colbert stated he was unsure. Mr. Wachter stated it could be another solution to the problem. Mr. Colbert stated it would work when personnel were available. Mr. Wachter started he felt crushed rock would not prevent wash-out problems. Mr. Colbert 4..:reed. Councilmember Wachter stated: he felt the County also had a responsibility to the citizens. Mt. Colbert stated the County was willing to accept a portion . o• •rsppin:$:j bility but would not be liable for the internal streets. Mayor E1lisbrr stated the City should step in and do something. He felt the time had come and $2,000.00 was a small price to pay. Councilmember Gustafson agreed. Gustafson moved, McCrea seconded, the motion to approve immediate construction of a temporary .1tergency access road through the Fairways Hills project to the :Re:be.Cta Lane/Pilot Knob Road intersection, at a cost not 00 .e:2cde-e4 $4,000.00, provided Dakota County accepts one-half of :the resperosibility. All voted in favor. Mayor Ellison questioned if. tho: City maintenance would be over and above the $4,000.00 cost. Mr. Colbert stated yes. Mr. Colbert further stated that the developer must allow access onto the property and that the City Attorney was working on the matter. Councilmember Wachter stated he was concerned regarding the southwest corner of Pilot Knob Road and County Road 30. He stated a resident's driveway was cut of .and .req.uested either a right -in, right -out or to combine with the •nett: ,txesidence. Public Works Director Tom Colbert stated the Girtrity had previously denied both requests and that numerous.meetin-gs had been conducted regarding the matter. CABiitOMMISSION Mike Reardon updated the Council on the cable logo access. CONSENT AGENDA The following consent 400:4& 1.4iiitts were submitted and recommended to be approved: A. Personnel Item. 1. Administrative Intern;.: xt• toi:as: ,r e•commended to accept the resignation of Susan DeMardo• ind •ttr aUthi rize the filling of the vacant administrative intern position. -4- 2. Fall Seasonal Park :kaihie.nanee• Workers. It was recommended to approve the hiring of Michelle Vadnais, Cary Stevens, Linda Wulff, Steven Schroeder and Will 441 Cass as temporary seasonal park maintenance workers for the fall season. 3. Fall Seasonal Forestry Aide. It was recommended to approve the hiring of Gerald Dalke as the temporary seasonal forestry aide for the fall season. 4. Parks and Recreati:bh Stt# lent Intern. The Council was informea that Beth Mondy, an undergraduate student at the University of Minnesota, would be interning with the Department of Parks and Recreation for 12 weeks this f.;%4 .a$. & art of her course requirements. Ms. Mondy wotrl•d 'hot be •an• employee of the City of Eagan. The item was for the Council's information and no action was required. B. plumbers Licenses. It was recommended to approve : h.e• following plumbers licenses: Berqual Plumbing; Hanson-Klevtit .P:um3:ing; Huber Plumbing and Heating; N. S. Mechanical; and Nor t i::idge Pl gibing. C. Receive Petition/Authoraze..Pa:rkAng Restrictions (Donald Avenue North of Letendre Avenue). It was recommended to receive the petition and authorize the installation of "no parking" restrictions on the west side of Donald Avenue north of Letendre Avenue. D. Receive Request/Authoz;e Park4»,g Restrictions (Sibley Terminal Industrial Park). It was recommended to•author:ze the installation and enforcement of "no parking" restrictions. within the entire Sibley Terminal Industrial Park. E. project 554, Receive Petition/Order Feasibility Report and Detailed Plans (General Electric Supply Company - Storm Sewer) . It was recommended to receive the petition for Project 554 (General Electric Supply Company-:.st:o.rm sewer) and authorize the feasibility rel..ort and detai :e0. •at s.; F. Project 552, ReceiVeFeasibility• Report/order Public Hearing (Eagandale Center Industric3J;:Park 3rd AAi.tion, Lone Oak Business Center, Phase 2 - Storm Se :cr and .Waterm•a•in) . It was recommended to tece• ve••the'f•easibility report for Project 552 (Eagandale Center Industrial Park 3rd Addition, Phase 2 - storm -5- sewer and watermain) and Q.x.der .a..p.ublic hearing to be held on Thursday, October 6, 19884 G. Contract 88-36, Approve Plan/Order Advertisement for Bids (Eagandale Center Industrial. Park 3rd Addition. Phase 2, and Country Hollow 2nd Addition - Utilities) . It was recommended to approve the plans for Contract 88-36 (ECIP 3rd Addition, Phase 2 and Country Hollow 2nd Addition - utilities) and authorize an advertise tent tor a bid opening to be held at 11:00 a.m. on Friday, September al), 19:0$. H. Contract 88-35, Approve 'Plans/Order Ad for Bids (Stratford Oaks - Utilities and Hidde.n:V;al,ly--Trunk Sanitary Sewer) . It was recommended to approve the plans for Contract 88-35 (Stratford Oaks - utilities and Hidden Valley - trunk sanitary sewer) and authorize advertisement for a bid opening to be held at 10:30 a.m., Friday, September 30, 1988. a. I. Contract 88-01. Approve 010 qe.:C?rder No. 2 (Fire Station No. It was recommended to approve Change Order No. 2 for Contract 88-01 and authorize the Mayor::aiid: City Clerk to execute all related documents. J. Contract 88-21. Approve Change Order No. 1 (Cliff Lake Center - Grading and Utilities) . Councilmember Wachter requested the staff check out any tree removal changes. Public Works Director Tom Colbert stated staff would check the matter out. It was recommended to:approu:0 Change Order No. 1 to Contract 88-21 (Cliff Lake Center -..grading and utilities) and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to eX0Oute 4.1. related documents. K. Contract 87-28, Approve •C range. Order No. 1 (Well No. 11) . It was recommended to approve Change Order No. 1 to Contract 87-28 (Well No. 11) and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute all related documents. L. Contract 87-28. Appr:c y'e Final.. ? yment/Acceptance (Well No. It was recommended to•:approve the tenth and final payment to Keys Well Drilling Company,. In:.::;a.•th:&• •&mount of $24,727.50 and accept the improvement for.' ,2:•r•:pe:t ua1 •t aintenance. -6- M. Contract 88-291 Rod: ::13:44 s:;�:Award Contract (Well No. 13) . It was recommended to•.receive the bids for Contract 88-29 (Well No. 13) and award the con€:ta ct to E. H. Renner & Sons, Inc. in the amount of $126,715.00 and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute all related documents. N. Final Plat. Bridle Ridge 2nd Addition. Councilmember Wachtei..quest.:oned why there were such extreme angles on the lots. Public':Work:;pirector Tom Colbert stated he was unsure but that they met Cade requirements. It was recommended t©:.0444c0e. the Final plat for the Bridle Ridge 2nd Addition and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute all related documents. 0. Planned Development Agreement. Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment. RahnCliff 2nd Addition/Aust4. Companies, Re -zoning of 16.08 LB and RB Acres to a Commer ,a1..:Planned Development District and a Preliminary Plat. It was recommended to. continue Item 0. (Planned Development Agreement, Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment, RahnCliff 2nd Addition/Austin Companies, Re -:of. 16.08 LB and RB acres to a commercial planned development distri.c :and a preliminary plat) . P. Contract 88-9. Approve Change Order No. 1 (Manor Lake Addition - Trunk Utilities). It was recommended to approve Change Order No. 1 to Contract 88-9 (Manor Lake Addition - •trunk ut ;3,::4es) and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute aLi r hated: documents. Q. Contract 87-20. Final PayMent/Acceptance (Eagandale Center Industrial Park 8th Additi_Qjj - Wa ermain and E -Z Air Park - Storm Sewer) . • It was recommended to approve F. Jedlicki, Inc. in the amount of acceptance of the improvements for to warranty provisions. the fourth and final payment to F. $7,497.92 and authorize the perpetual City maintenance subject R. Contract 86-17, FinolA)Aymei tiAcceptance (Sperry Consolidation Facility - Uti ities) . It was recommended to 'approve the 0.ixth and final payment for Contract 86-17 (Sperry Cons014.da•tion:. 'a4lity - utilities) to Northdale Construction Co.,; :In +' i:rt•.:t t amount of $24,527.51 and authorize the acceptance for perpetual maintenance of related City facilities subject to appropriate warranties. -7- S. Extension of Final..4ppt0,11:41. Eagan High School Addition. It was recommended to extend the final plat approval for Eagan High School Addition until. September 30, 1988. Wachter moved, Gustafson seconded, the motion to approve the foregoing consent agenda items, except agenda Item 0., and authorize their implementation. All voted in favor. VACATION/PUBLIC HEARING/LOT 8/HILLTOP OF EAGAN Public Works Director 'Tom Cabert informed the Council that on August 2, 1988, the Counci.l..r:ece.ved .A. petition to vacate the blanket drainage and utility easerme:nt:s::WO 'th:e.:common open space of the condominium development proposed to be located on Lot 8, Hilltop of Eagan. He stated it was anticipated that the final plat for the replatting of this property into the down -zoned single family Berry Ridge Addition would have been processed and approved prior to this public hearing. He stated this would have provided for the required replacement drainage and utility eas04e1ts necessary to the processing of the petition vacat.i:c:n.:.:He informed the Council that the staff is recommending that :tShe public hearing be closed and that formal action be deferred =until the :September 19, 1988, Council meeting subject to the final. 1p1:4t: approval. Wachter moved, Gustafson secondet:, the motion to close the public hearing and continue consideration for the vacation of public drainage and utility easements (Lot 8, Hilltop of Eagan) to the September 19, 1988, City Council meeting. All voted in favor. PROJECT 549/PUBLIC HEARING/STRATFORD OAKS Mayor Ellison opened the 'isi7'I .i:e hearing regarding the Stratford Oaks sanitary and storm sewer proI:ect. Public Works Director :om Colbert stated that on August 2, 1988, the Council had received a ::eas: ;:b;.. .ty.• :report for the installation of sanitary and storm sewer fa,dil :' iesu •neee•ssary to service the proposed multiple residential development of Stratford Oaks located in the southwest corner of Thomas Lake Road and Diffley Road (County Road 30) . He stated all notices had been published in the legal newspaper and sent to all potentially affeote.d property owners informing them of the public hearing. Consulting Engineer Mari Hanson ptesented the project details to the Council. There was no public cotcikant: Councilmember Wachter q0040604• the water storage could be raised. Mr. Hanson stated •i•t' •couIc be raised as there was sufficient storage. Mr. Wachter also stated he would like the height of the pond increased. Public Works Director Tom Colbert stated the matter would be looked into. McCrea moved, Egan seconded, the motion to close the public hearing and approve Project 549 (Stratford Oaks - sanitary and storm sewer) . All voted in favor... PROJECT 545/PUWLIC BEARING/CLEARVIEW ADDITION Mayor Ellison opened the .publ.ic .hearing regarding Project 545, Clearview Addition - Stree•$:;. Public Works Director Tom Colbert stated that on August 2, 1988, the Council received a feasibility report for the installation of street improvements to the Clearview Addition incorporating Lenore Lane and Beecher Drive. He stated all notices of the meeting had been published in the legal newspaper anal• got to all potentially affected property owners informing them of. the ' ublic hearing. He further stated that a neighborhood me:e:ti:ng had been held on Thursday, September 1, 1988, to discuss• the pr:Qposed improvements with the affected property owners. The Council received letters fr•ea: •Walter C. Hammer, Dale A. Peterson, and Ernest F. Horning (copies of letters attached to minutes as Exhibits "B", "C", and "D"). Consulting Engineer Mark Hanson presented the project details to the Council. He updated the Council on the nature of the improvements and stated three hearings had :been had regarding the matter. He stated the cost of the asse:s:sment.0 w•p•ula. be divided equally among the benefitted property owners;.. ' John Klein, represent$•n0 his• •ion, Peter Klein, felt there was an inequity in the distributiO4 of the .a.s.seesments. He stated his son's lot was a half lot and was =allot than. the other lots. Mayor Ellison stated he had received several letters addressing this issue. Public Works Director Tom. •C4b:e::•t .stated there are two methods for assessing: 1. Front footage; and 2. Per lot basis. . He stated the per lot bas'iS 18 an acceptable method because all lots receive equal access to the street. Councilmember McCrea. :q:1i-ee:fi.437ted how many of the lots could be subdivided. Mr. Colbert stated all of the lots are developed and he was unsure if any could be split as he had not done a detailed analysis. Councilmember Eagan agreed with Mr. Colbert's analysis and stated the lots were not in real unique situations which would justify a per lot assessment. Councilmember Wachter agreed that front footage would be best. Floyd Forsberg, Lot 1:2., Blo:eic 2, supported the improvements and assessments. However, he objected:to the $9,000.00 assessment as he felt Mr. Eaton should be aszesse4 for that amount. Public Works Director Tom Colbert stated the expenditure would have been incurred if the subdivision developed :a:s: o ic9i:naiy proposed. He stated the project was done by a change .crtifet. He stated there was frontage lot assessments for the residential areas which left $9,000.00. Councilmember Egan questioned if the neighbors wanted the street narrowed and stated it was not mentioned in their letters. Mr. Forsberg stated he thought the deve14pe:s had handled that matter. Sharon Miller, Lot 4, .s.tated..sh:e has a corner lot and is against the front footage assessment: Mayor 'Ellison questioned if she would receive the corner credit: Mr... Colbert stated she would receive the corner lot credit. Ms. Miller atat±:e:a .she opposed the sodding. Mr. Colbert stated the improvement shoUI:d 15e,uniform and that only the disturbed area would be sodded and seded. Pam VanBeck, Lot 14, stated she was against the improvements as she felt she would be paying the Cliff Road assessments. She further stated she had concerns regarding the traffic. Mr. Egan questioned if t e 'o !ANN:14:4:3e 4:.fie a corner lot credit for a lot on a county road. Mr. 001bert:.:bated the credit may have previously been received far Cliff' Road and that either way, a creait would be received. Consulting Engineer Mark Hanson stated the numbers would not change much for Uont 4o0tage. Councilmember Gustafson questioned the front footage..pr.o:bJ;:>~ is::end stated he felt per lot assessment made more sense. ' Jim Hill, Lot 2, informed the Council he wanted the front footage assessment. Dick Roget, Lot 7, state:tl: b..ja :d:ppo:sition to the per lot assessment anti the project. :!i:e• questifted how many votes were necessary to pass. Mayor Ellison stated. -Lt would require three votes of the Council. Councilmember Wachter q40s: .anew:,..: in 1979 there was a surplus of funds. Tom Colbert stated::he-- •ev.uldri'lt.find any excess revenue and that staff did recall comments to that effect. -10- Councilmember McCrea q:vestioned if the inclusion of the $9,334.00 unassessed cost from Project 472 should be dropped. She asked for a show of hands ttOM tle $014.c. i1.:ic. Bob Trevis, Lot 5, favored the improvement but wanted narrower streets. Connie DuVick, Lot 11, favored the improvements. Marge Piele, Lot 5, favored the project. Sharon Miller asked Y:f: light$ could be added to the project. Mr. Colbert stated lights could: be aided with the funding from the general funds. He stated Iicghts 'Would be prioritized with the other intersections in the city and. it could be from one to three years before the lights would be 44441.10... :Mayor Ellison stated that if there were lights throughout the area, the whole area would be assessed. Ms. Miller stated she would like a signal. Mr. Colbert stated it would never be signalized as it was too close to the intersection. John Klein stated his son want.ed•ecuitable assessments. Mr. Colbert stated the assessments c40:d :be prepared both ways. Councilmember McCrea .q estionec: the solvency of the street fund. City Administrator Tom Hedges' ,stated that Pilot Knob would absorb most of the funds. McCrea stated: :$fe'w:as concerned regarding the adding of Project 472. Councilmember' .pari stated that if the matter were held over, he felt there would still be winners and losers. He stated the Council must bite the bullet and choose. He further stated the neighbors did not mention street width in their letters and did not perceive a concensus regarding the matter. He asked for a show of hands. Councilmember Wachter stated he still favors the front footage. He stated people can ase th.e. assessment. Wachter moved, Egan seconded:,• the motion to close the public hearing and approve Project 545 (Clearview Addition - Streets) on a front footage basis, excluding Prpject No. 472, and authorized the preparation of detailed plaits an4 •$.pecif.ications. Ellison, Wachter, Egan and McCrea voted in favo:rI:Gus t•afsQh was opposed. Councilmember McCrea stated she would have preferred a per lot method with Project 472 waived. PROJECT 542/PUBLIC HEARING,ALDER .POND - STREETS AND UTILITIES Mayor Ellison opened tbe• next pub•13.c hearing regarding Project 542, Alden Pond - streets dila utilities-:. Public Works Director.'Tdm Colt)ez.t..stated that on August 2, 1988, the Council had received a .:a:as: b;itl.ity . teport for installation of -11- streets and utilities withip the proposed Alden Pond development located in the southeast corner of Coachman and Four Oaks Road. He further stated all notices• ha . tbce t • to fished regarding the public hearing in the legal newspaper and dent to all potentially affected property owners inf orming:•them of the public hearing. Pete Willerbring, Consulting Engineer, presented the project to the Council in detail. Public Works Director Tom Colbert stated that the NSP policy differs from the Dakota Electric Association policy. He recommended removal from the project ie NSP ••c}id not provide credits. James Littman stated •the deOloper had promised a curve in the road at the north end. The engj:.pe.er stated the change had been made. Mr. Littman requested stop signs ani:.Mty Colbert stated the signs would be provided. Mr. Littman questioned what must be done to get signals at Coachman and Yankee Doodle. Mr. Colbert stated the conduit was in place but that the signals were being prioritized with other intersections. He stated a petition would speed up the process. Councilmember Wachter questioned if the. curve would improve safety. Mr. Colbert stated there was very 1.j.ttle traffic. Mr. Littman stated he had not received a notice of the fleeting. Mr. Colbert stated Mr. Littman was not being assea.se :and it was not required to send him a notice. Councilmember Egan pointed :Q:Q.t that there was a semaphore every one-quarter mile. He stated he wanted: 1!eieral reconsidered. Mr. Colbert stated there are peak problems at Federal because of Unisys. Ken Hartwell, Rosewood Corporation, stated he wanted a 10 -year assessment and thought ten years was in the works and that Rosewood had planned accordingly. He stated a five-year assessment was levied. Mayor Ellison questioned if t;Yi•e:re co.u1.4 .be a ten-year assessment. Mr. Colbert stated there could .:100.a tenyyear assessment but five years was City policy. Mayor Ell.i$on qu :s:tioned if it would be setting a bad precedent. City Administrator Tom Hedges stated no that it had been done before. Councilmeaber McCrea questioned if there would be an additional cost. Mr. Co ::be•r.t stated there would not be an additional cost. McCrea moved, Egan seconded, the motion to close the public hearing and approve Project 542 (Alden Pond - Streets and Utilities), with a ten-year assessment period, A11 voted in favor. FINAL ASSESSMENT HEARINGS.pROJ.F.CTS. 5.03, 493, 502, 479, 504, 4608, 486, 461, 478, 492, 505 and :499 . Mayor Ellison opened the public hearings regarding the final assessments. Public Works Director Tom Colbert informed the Council that 12 projects had their final assessment rolls prepared and their public hearings scheduled for September 6, 1988. He stated 11 of the 12 projects should have their .publi..c. hearings held to receive input from the affected property ownas regarding the proposed final costs resulting from the installation•a the public improvements. He further stated Project 49g:should be continued to September 19, 1988, due to errors that were di•$.cave.r•:Erl..req:µ•iring a revision to the final assessment roll requiring :0w• :nQtifcat.ions. He further stated all assessments were levied in accordance with City policies and/or the methods defined in the feasibility report presented at the Project's respective public hearing. All notices of the public final assessment hearing were sent to all affected property owners informing them of their proposed final assessment obligations. In addition, all notices were published in the legal newspaper. .s• required by state statute. PROJECT 503, WINDTRES•8iB ADDI TON - STREETS AND UTILITIES Egan moved, Wachter see0n4.e41. the motion to close the public hearing and approve the final assb:s:siO3#t. roll for Project 503, Windtree 8th Addition - streets and utilities, and authorize the certification to the County for collection. All voted in favor. PROJECT 493, GREENSBORO 2ND ADDITION - STREETS AND UTILITIES McCrea moved, Gustafson seconded, the motion to close the public hearing and approve the final Aase&sm.e•nt• roll for Project 493, Greensboro 2nd Addition - gtteets: &Ad•utilities, and authorize the certification to the CountZ: .for cO.lection. All voted in favor. PROJECT 502,..'a & B .At DITION - STORM SEWER McCrea moved, Gustafsci•M seconded, the motion to close the public hearing and approve the final assessment roll for Project 502, R & B Addition - storm sewer, and authorize the certification to the County for collection. All voted in favor. PROJECT 479, LEXINGTON/$94i3SW PARK - TRUNK STORM SEWER Gustafson moved, Wacht:.0 seconded,: the motion to close the public hearing and approve the final assessment roll for Project 479, Lexington/Northview Park gunk storm 02Wer, and authorize the certification to the County' tQ.K .e4I ;a t.i:on. All voted in favor. -13- PROJECT 504, WHISPERING *WOODS 2ND ADDITION — STREETS AND UTILITIES McCrea moved, Egan secv:n;c"I2•d4. the :•,tion to close the public hearing and approve the final assessment roll for Project 504, Whispering Woods 2nd Addition - streets and utilities, and authorize the certification to the County for collection. All voted in favor. PROJECT 460B, NORTH NICOLS ROAD - STREETS Public Works Director Tom Colbert stated a large rectangular lot was adjusted in a follow-u:p: noti:0e. Perry Hanson, Lot 10i contested the assessments. He stated he had sewer backup in the past and there was also a great deal of traffic noise. He stated he. 1s• •se . .iiiq his house because he is on a fixed income. Mr. Colbert 'agr.eed: that the street needed repair and did not know which came first, whether it was the traffic or the improvement. He stated he felt the cost met the benefits. Mayor Ellison questioned if there was a variance for hardship. Mr. Colbert stated there was a senior citizen deferment based on age and income criteria. He further stated he would .meet with Mr. Hanson. Mr. Hanson reiterated his concerns. Mayor E4i:s0n. asked if the City had contributed at least 50%. Mr... Corj;he•Y:t stated he was correct. Wachter moved, Gustafson. Seconded, the motion to close the public hearing and approve the f:?ital assessment roll for Project 460B, North Nicols Road - streets, awl :authorize the certification to the County for collection. All voted in favor. PROJECT 486, E -Z AIRPARK - STORM SEWER Bob Chardell, E -Z Airpark manager, asked how the assessment was split. Mr. Colbert explained the determination. Wachter moved, Gustafson secAhtled, the motion to close the public hearing and approve the final assessment roll for Project 486, E -Z Airpark - storm sewer, and atui;horize the certification to the County for collection. All. •VQt.ed. 4;,. favor. PROJECT 461, YANKEE DOODLE ROAD - I -35E TO LEXINGTON AVENUE - STREETS Martin Colon, Federal Land Company, requested a delay until the next meeting so the engineers could examine the matter. Public Works Director Tom Colbert stated he :a_reed• with the continuance. McCrea moved, Wachter .fie:donded, the. motion to close the public hearing and continue the matter for Project 461, Yankee Doodle Road - I -35E to Lexington Avenue --f streets unti;.k the September 19, 1988, City Council meeting. All voted in.fa�r�ar,. -14- PROJECT 478,:LEXINGTON- MIT44 — SANITARY SEWER McCrea moved, Gustafson seconded, the motion to close the public hearing and approve the f:in:al assessment roll for Project 478, Lexington Hill - sanitary sewer, and authorize the certification to the County for collection. All voted in favor. PROJECT 492, LONE OAK 2ND ADDITION/O'NEIL DRIVE - WATER AND SANITARY Francis O'Neil questj:4ned the location of the sanitary sewer. Public Works Director Tom Olbert pointed out the location on a map to Mr. O'Neil. Wachter moved, Gustaf:s«s :0e:00:nded:, the motion to close the public hearing and approve• the :f:Y:haI assessment roll for Project 492, Lone Oak 2nd Addition/O'Neil Drive - water and sanitary, and authorize the certification to the County for collection. All voted in favor. PROJECT 505, COUNTRY HOLLOW ADDITI.ON i- TRUNK STORM AND SANITARY Public Works Director stat, ,d.:h:: had received three written objections regarding Parce.l.s 116-59, ::0-60 and 20-60. The objections claim they receive no benefits, George Dorf ler, Parcel 11-59, 'pr:ote:sted the assessment. He stated he felt they were included in a high-cost development district and questioned if they were eligible for a credit. Mayor Ellison asked which assessments the Dorflers and Meyers were paying for. Mr. Colbert stated Parcel 10-60 was assessed only for the trunk storm sewer. He stated there was an equal rate for all single family. He further stated Meyers is a smalj.er lot whereas Dorfler's property was larger. He stated they did •nat..clilal.i.f'jtor a credit. Jim Meyer, Parcel 10-6.0, stated he was concerned about future assessments. Mr. Colbert stated there would be no further assessments for trunk storm sewer. Larry Oldenberg, Parcel 20-40, stated he felt there were excessive assessments and wanted to meet with Mr. Colbert in the future. He stated he had problems with the restoration of his yard and driveway and that his mower was damaged. Tom Colbert recommended. :t1e..:tlf:ee:.parcels be excluded. Councilmember McCrea wanted the Klein •ptoperty also excluded. Mr. Colbert stated that normally. a writtentabjection is required but he would research the matter..Re recommended. inclusion at this time. Councilmember Egan iniari ecl g: :;, 4t e:nberg to submit a claim to the City for the mower damages: • •• - -15- Mr. Dorfler stated the record of ownership needed updating. McCrea moved, Wachter s`edanded-, the motion to close the public hearing and approve the fis1.a1 assessment roll for Project 505, Country Hollow Addition - trunk storm and sanitary, except Parcels No. 11-59, 10-60 and 20-60, with staff recalculating the cost to the three parcels, and authorize the certification to the County for collection. All voted in favor. PROJECT 499, CHAPEL HILL BAPTIST CHURCH - STREETS Wachter moved, Gustafson se:COnded, the motion to close the public hearing and continti: the ttatter for Project 499, Chapel Hill Baptist Church - streets, to the. September 19, 1988, Council meeting. All voted in favor. COMPREHENSIVE GUIDE PLAN AMENDMENT AND RE—ZONING/LEXINGTON LAND COMPANY City Administrator Tom Hedges updated the Council on the freeway zoning district. He asked direction fr:m. the Council on the concept. City Planner Dale Runkle.-sxp1ained the freeway zoning overlay concept. Mayor Ellison questioned it it was a voluntary overlay. Mr. Runkle stated the overlay zone:140.0.d not restrict the use which is already governed by the zoning. •d:i tf'1..ct.;. it would only attempt to establish performance standards and tty to restrict some of the undesirable uses. Councilmember McCrea stated she liked the overlay approach. Mayor Ellison questioned if they should delay implementation tonight to implement the overlay. Mr. Runkle stated he would prefer the overlay rather than pure freeway zoning. Mayor Ellison questioned how Lexington Land was affect:e:d, :Mr.;. Miin-kle suggested a continuance of the matter. Mayor Elliso:rr asked if Lexington Land objected to the continuance. Mr. Runkle stated not at this time. Councilmember Egan asked. now:the. plan compared with Bloomington. Mr. Runkle stated there are some •cm:pari:sons and some differences. He stated performance standards were the bottom line. Councilmember McCrea questioned the 120 day limit. Mr. Runkle stated Lexington Land had submitted a letter requesting an extension. McCrea moved, Egan seconded, th ::motion to continue the comprehensive guide plan ame:n:gment for",Oxington Land Company and re -zoning of 57 R-3 acres t'0 a planned development district indefinitely to allow the Catty to final ze its freeway zoning procedure. All voted in faVOt:,, -16- RE—ZONING AND PRELIMINARY PLAN/GALAXIE CLIFF PLAZA City Administrator Tbt Hedges Stated a public hearing was held by the Advisory Planning .Commission at the regular meeting on July 26, 1988, to consider a cOhzprehensive guide plan amendment, re -zoning and a preliminary plat entitled Galaxie Cliff Addition as requested by the Cliff Plaza Partnership. He stated the City Council had reviewed the applications, allowed public testimony and spent approximately three hours reviewing the proposal for the Galaxie Cliff Plaza project at the.Augus.t 2, 1988, City Council meeting. The matter was sent back to the: Advi:g:ory Planning Commission for review. The APC reconsidered the G:alaxie:Cliff Plaza applications at their August 23, 1988, meeting a:nd rec:omrnended approval of the re -zoning and preliminary plat appli.catx.gns. as. pr.e.sented. City Planner Dale Runkle stated separate applications had been submitted to the City requesting a re -zoning of 5.7 agricultural acres to a planned development district for Limited Business use only, and a preliminary plat of 25.36 acres consisting of one 2.7 acre lot for an office building and tw) :outlots containing 3.0 acres for the future development with Lim:o:d::Business zoning. The remaining 19.7 acres remain a.g.x; 0izl: rurally zoned and are being platted as outlots so the 1003. desOtiptions and an overall road layout can be resolved. Na •development can occur on any of the outlots without going throut* the public hearing process. Mr. Runkle further stated the pt:evious proposal and development partnership was directed by the City Council to revise the overall plan to include Limited Business use only. Since then the partnership has been dissolved. Tri -Land Properties will still develop the area on the west side of Circulation Drive and William Soules will retain rights to the agricultural -zoned land between Galaxie Avenue and Circulation Drive. The propo.s:43. i.nau:de.S: both names for platting requirements only. The appr:4xitate.1.y 3 acre, RB zoned piece in the southwest corner is not inc.uded lw:ith either the re -zoning or the preliminary plat request. Mr. Runkle stated the Wo:: :a: ;l..cr•c•uiation system remains the same as the previous propoaa1. :The :s:ttee.t would be constructed from Galaxie Avenue to the south end of the office building lot with the initial phase. That road would be extended as develop occurs and ultimately have to provide access to the RB piece. Tri -Land Companies has agreed to the PD concept (zoning) for the office lot and two outlots so an overall astheti•c::cmpa;ti,.bility can be achieved. Code requires 116 parking stalls .and 171 •hav:e been provided for potential cross -parking. Only the amount necessary for the office building would be constructed until -the adjacent users are determined. Only 18 foot length stalls would bd::required where curbing is provided. -17- Brad Swenson, develo•r, and Bob Close explained the site landscape design and Circulation Drive and the retaining wall to the Council. Bob Vanning updated the Council on the location of the building, the lighting details, and the architectural details. Brad Swenson questioned condition number 3 and stated it was not correct regarding south of Circulation Drive. Staff agreed that the condition was mis-noted in the minutes. Ellen Hanson, 4900 Saari, :r:ead a letter from Mary Winchester, 1830 Karis Way, to the Council. :Ms. Winchester was concerned with piece -meal development. Ma. Hanson urged denial of the request and reminded the Mayor of his past .pram.i .es and statements. She reiterated her concern rega.t:d�t.h;c aconflict of interest and stated she felt the Council had already decided to vote for the matter. Helen Hanson, 4900 Safari, stated she had health, welfare and safety concerns regarding the matter. She stated she appreciated Mr. Wachter's negative vote on Rahncliff. She questioned who owned the property. She also stated she felt t :e:re: was a conflict of interest in regards to Councilmember McCrea.. She urged denial of the matter until questions were resolved,. Scott Elrud, 4978 Safat4 stated he felt there is too much development and was concerned. rdgar:c in:g. the traffic. He urged that the whole area be zoned for office bd:. dings. Greg Maloney, 4713 Westwind, stated he was against the plan. He had concerns regarding the RB zoning. Jim Gallaway, 4841 Sky View, urged rejection of the proposal because he was concerned regardi:ng saf:eoy and welfare. Jeff Carlson, 4730 We:s:tWind, .•asked what safeguards there were against conditional use to allow restaurants. Mayor Ellison stated there would have to be a reappearance before the City Council. Mr. Carlson submitted ownerships:.?apers:.tp. the Council and outlined the ownership. He stated he did:.not ..sce-•.4 :r:e:cent submission to Dakota County. Mayor Ellison asked for the status of the 50 -foot buffer. City Planner Dale Runkle stated originally there was a 50 -foot buffer along Galaxie. He stated Mr. $.o14i1.0 .:apposes the condition, however, the staff would like it to r: :a: n. 144y0r Ellison asked if Mr. Soules would have to appear before :pie Council; • Mr. Runkle stated he would have to appear. Councilmember Egan stated .he c 00 a letter from Mary Winchester. He stated that ::g;:4othe:8h li§:was on the entire parcel, -18- suitable to the neighborhO'd, the matter could be resolved. He stated the project has always proceeded as a PD. Mr. Egan read from the City Code regarding the ordinance :4114 :the : t: pose of a PD. Mr. Egan stated he had two concerns, the first *tat: that the entire parcel is LB. He had reservations about the•PD with a single underlying zoning district. He stated he did. not want to give up the City's ability to control the developer through a PD agreement. He felt the present proposal did not give much control. He felt the neighborhood concerns might be justified. He questioned what would happen next time. He stated if approved as shown, the Council has no idea of what the rest of the parcel would be. H.e. had strong reservations about the present proposal. He stated too m:4ny things could change and he wanted to know the uses and the layout. H$:felt if it could not be demonstrated tonight, he felt the pr opp:$al was pre -mature. Mayor Ellison questio:tte:d £ .0 ;:r:e:u ,4tion Drive was a cul-de-sac. He asked why the whole stretch Vas not built. Mr. Runkle stated Mr. Soules would not dedicate at the present time. Councilmember McCrea asked for clarifications regarding Councilmember Egan's points. She stated last time a PD was presented to the Council, the Council sent it b40(. She questioned if the Council should hold off until know:ing:the actual users. Councilmember Egan stated' the Q '.Neil property was similar. McCrea stated she sees the street as an infrastructure. She questioned what Mr. Egan meant :by .pur Qse. Mr. Egan stated that some things should be removed, but the LB hag permitted and also conditional uses. He wanted to know what they are. MrCrea stated she felt it was important not to mislead people and that the categories must be explicit. Councilmember Wachter stated he did not want RB zoning at any point. Councilmember Gustafson stated the Council sent back the last proposal and questioned if that proposal met Mr. Egan's requirements. He stated the Cco.uncil co.!. d deal with the RB later. He further stated the Council h&d.:the .opportunity to review the entire parcel and that taking a d : ering:position did not mean the Council did not listen. He stated he believes that the community did not want LB zoning ever and that it would n:ot matter what was proposed. Mr. Gustafson stated he felt tb:: CQun0i:1- hack an obligation to live within the law and that they must •did the :be5hey could with the existing LB zoning. He stated it was not feasible to make it residential. He stated the Council had listened and if there was just cause, could change the zoning. He felt that safety was not a reason to deny and that the Council needed to make a decision at the meeting and not delay the project. Mayor Ellison asked if the Counc'i'l :Could examine the legality of the entire PD. City Attorney aim Sheldon• stated the Council could examine any development anc: •that there may be legal ramifications. He stated that if the Council bid approve.d.the prior plan, the developer would have the ball in its ::jx.t;:• :Mayor, Ellison stated that he felt -19- the parcel should be taken: as an entire package. He felt the split between the owners was uni~•Q.z.t.unate.:. fie: further stated that last time the Council wanted the heath : ]:•ai:.cgiakted. He felt it would be better to put conditions on the proposal. He stated he would like to consider the original 25 acres. Giving the re-zoning with the PD agreement with the remainder as outlots. Councilmember Egan stated the plan last month should exclude the restaurant (Class B) and the U.S. Swim and Fitness. He felt the PD should be as tight as possible for the City's sake. He stated he felt Egan's comprehensive guide ;plan is good, but must be flexible. He stated that because of changes of circumstances, the Council had the discretion to control useg::so th:y would be compatible with the surrounding neighborhood. He felt.he would like the proposal to be brought back to show the c se:$:, Councilmember Gustafson agreed that the health club and retail store should be pulled out and classify the allowable restaurant. Mayor Ellison suggested making them LB outlots as the developers would have to come before the Council again. Councilmember McCrea stated that even with a plan, the developer would have to come back before the Council. Councilmember Elan: stated that a PD can be modified but it must use the piiblit :process. McCrea stated that if there were an outlot, any time a developer wanted a change, he would come.betp.re the Council. Mayor Ellison recapped the Rahncliff technique. Councilmember Wachter asked if the buffer was no longer viable. Mr. Soules stated the buffer should be in relation to what is there now. He questioned if a buffer would not be required north of Circulation Drive. Dale Runkle Stated he. was correct. Mr. Soules stated he did not want a buffer .0n ::southern most portion. He stated it was an open plain# :and 4p:felt he would be donating the land. Councilmember Gustafson stated a PD should deal with the buffer. He would be in favor of dropping' the .$:ti:w.toot buffer and writing landscape controls into the •ttr. Ellison moved, Gustafson seconded, the motion to approve the re -zoning of 25.36 acres from agricultural to LB (Limited Business) planned development district and. a preliminary plat for one 2.7 acre lot for an office building wi.t :tie .remaining property being contained in an outlot, subj:eer to the.developer working with staff to obtain a PD that meets the concerns'(. the Council. Councilmember Egan stated he felt the entire matter should be continued. -20- City Administrator Tom Hedges stated there were two ways to approach the matter, either.:apkove..tom. Mayor's motion or plan the PD first. He stated that with itzihnciiff, they authorized the agreement and then re -zoned. Mayor Ellison stated the Council was not limiting the City's options regarding Mr. Soules. He stated it would be a PD. Councilmember McCrea stated that the proposed conditions should apply to the 2.7 acres of :office building except for condition number 3. Mayor Ellison stated he felt the entire PD should be completed before the next meeting. Mx. hIedge.s.s.tated that once the property was granted its re -zoning, it 06114.00t :b ::revised. Mayor Ellison questioned that if it was re -zoned contingent on the PD, did that address the concerns. Councilmember Egan stated that a PD requires tieing down the development and that the Council should know the uses. He stated the Council had dealt with larger areas. Mayor Ellison stated that there were two owners involved with the proposal. Ellison, Gustafson, and M?Graa: .voted in favor; Egan and Wachter were opposed. The motion failed::. Egan moved, Wachter secon#ed,. the motion to continue the matter. Councilmember Egan stated he felt the -Patter should be continued and felt the developer should show the development on the entire parcel, even if it were a reasonable phase deveidpment. Mayor Ellison asked the developer's opinion. Brad Swenson stated he was forced to work with parties with different view points. He stated that he was frustrated and felt it was not practical to have just office zoning. He stated he lacked direction and questioned how he should work with the people. Mr. Egan stated if it Were not a PD, they could go to straight zoning. McCrea stated the Council liad gone full circle and they would be in the same spot they were at the last meeting. The developer stated they were trying to: :PJ:1.Qw:.an :av:e:rall PD and that they needed to move forward. Mayor Ellison questioned what would happen beyond the 120 -day limit. City Attorney Jim Sheldon stated the preliminary plat would be approved without further action and that the Council must act on the preliminary plat or it would .be:• Oppr:dved. Egan and Wachter vote4.f4i favor; McCrea, Ellison and Gustafson were opposed. The motion failed. McCrea moved, Gustafson .s.e.conde.4 k e motion to approve the re -zoning of 5.7 agriculture;..cto$• :to..4..•lanned development district -21- for Limited Business use ably, .McCrea,. Ellison and Gustafson voted in favor; Wachter and Egan vgrtect :g: the motion failed. Councilmember Egan dtAted he felt the motion called for the developer to do a lot of ark but that he felt the Council did not have a choice. Mayor Ellison questioned if there were any other motions. Mr. Egan requested the Council reconsider his previous motion. Councilmember McCrea asked: the Council if they would reconsider her motion if she excluded the.PD. Councilmember Gustafson stated that straight zoning is to go to LB *aping. He felt that to put it under a PD, it would be different .and it would not be straight zoning. Egan questioned if there could .be- .rnar.e control than a PD. Gustafson questioned the architectur:a. dtc}xi: :City Planner Dale Runkle stated the developer far exceeds that which would be required under straight zoning. Mr. Egan questioned if the Council was going to have to sit through this again for each proposal. Gustafson moved, McCrea seconded, .the motion to approve the re -zoning of 25.36 acres from agricQ.lt:yx:al to Limited Business. Wachter, Gustafson, Ellison and:.ICV:ed voted in favor; Egan was opposed. Gustafson moved, McCrea £:e:donded, the motion to approve the previous conceptual plan eliminattitg the health and fitness facility, the restaurant and the retail store, .making them outlots, and other uses as designated. Wachter, Gustafson, Ellison and McCrea voted in favor; Egan was opposed. Gustafson moved, McCrea seconded, the motion to approve the preliminary plat on 2.7 acres subject to the following conditions, and make the entire 25.36 ae:re;s..a planned development district which planned development is to •bi. submii:t:te•d• as soon as possible or at the next scheduled Council meeang: • ' 1. These standard condition$ oaf plat approval as adopted by Council action on September: 5,. i'W .$ha11 be complied with: Al, Bl, B2, B3, B4, Cl, C2, C3, C4•;.:C5 , Dir tit- P1 and G1. 2. A Planned Development Agreement shall be entered into for a five-year period. 3. The trash shall be conta;.ne: •within the office building on Lot 1, Block 1, or be attar ed: using •:the same materials as the office building. 4. All signage shall 3 e subject ta the one-time sign fee of $2.50 per square foot and other :sign lictianance requirements. 5. All outlots shall -be• •i.eviewe4 .by the Advisory Planning Commission and the City Cattn404 6. The shared parking: concept, parking up to the north property line on Lot 1, Block 1, snail be approved. 7. The overall design layout for Circulation Drive shall be approved as proposed on the preliminary plat. 8. All rooftop mechar : .cal equipment shall be screened. 9. All sides of the ku:ildin.gs shall be treated architecturally with the same materials. • 10. The parking lot layvtit Dar irit. 14 Block 1, shall be revised, having 18' -length stalls where curbing is provided. 11. All landscaping shall be compatible in size, specie, and quantity. Effort to save existing hardwood species shall be demonstrated wherever possible. 12. All site generated star* rater runoff is required to be conveyed to Pond AP -14. 13. The development is r'eq i:xf:ed. to submit the detail plans and specifications for the proposed retaiih;g wall construction for staff review and approval prior to final plat. approval. 14. The site plan details of the proposed Lot 1, Block 1, development are subject to further review and requirements as a part of the final plat review process. 15. The developer agrees :oat the: fop lowing uses will be prohibited in the Planned DeVelopne:pt: radio/tv, outdoor storage, lodges, swimming pools, garden sti:te, movie theatres and municipal -type buildings. •. All voted in favor. Councilmember Wachter stated he changed his vote to allow City controls, otherwise the controls would be lost. MEDIAN COT/BLACRHAWR• .PLAZA SHOPPING CENTER City Administrator Tom.:e:dges stoat:!:d that at the August 16, 1988, City Council meeting,:,,fit. Luther ::alland, representing the Blackhawk Plaza Shopping Center development, appeared and requested a left -turn median cut to pride entrance to the Blackhawk Shopping Center for traffic moving e:as:tbqun•d: •on 134ffley Road. At that meeting, the City staff represented :tli•e t'i:t rts consultant, Mr. Glen Van Wormer of SEH, had recently recommended that the median cut not be -23- allowed with reasons that ate co4s4te4t with the Dakota County transportation standards.. 4r v: ;14444d..claimed that Mr. Van Wormer's recent position was inconsistent with a previous position on a median cut and asked that a meeti:hg be held to further discuss the matter. The City Council continued. the item until the September 6, 1988, meeting to allow Mr. Van Wormer, representatives of the City staff and Mr. Stalland to meet and further discuss the median cut. In his letter to the City dated August 22, 1988, Mr. Van Wormer recommended that the City not take positive action on the median opening. Mr. Van Wormer stated that Dakota: County .is responsible for traffic operations along Diffley i7:oad a:4: had been somewhat adamant in their refusal to provide a medi.:i. operi:ing. The fact that the County had granted an entrance onto :t ffley.Road based on the agreement that the developer would not pursue .a me:d;ian. o: ginning, indicated the concern that the County had over pr•ape:r -0per:a:t4cJn of the roadway. Luther Stalland recapped his meeting with Mr. Van Wormer for the Council. He suggested a way to make the median cut. He stated he felt Mr. Van Wormer's letter was "off the wall" considering what was agreed to at the meeting of August 19,. 088. Richard Wolsfela discussed the following: 1. Detailed plan; 2. Advantages/disadvantage.si 3. Van Wormer's proposal. He stated the City could signalize the cut if there was a problem and that the developer would pay for the median and the off -ramp. He stated that a left turn increases customers and that u -turns are dangerous. He felt the cut would not cause safety problems. The developer req:ues:ted th:: O:i:ty not object to the project. Mayor Ellison asked Mr+ Runkle if the developer was correct in saying that Mr. Van Wormer. .changed. his opinion. Mr. Runkle stated there was discussion but th t nothing was agreed to at the meeting. The developer stated that Ot the meeting, he felt they agreed to the solution. Mr. Runkle- stated Mr. Van Wormer was to get back to the developer on the matter. Mayor Ellison asked Mr. Colbert what he suggested in the matter. Mr. Colbert stated he had not ben.involvea and questioned how it would get through the County.4. '.#le 444.0ot foresee any problems which would cause the City to be .s:t: ahgly against the project. He stated that not having the median would promote: u -turns and that a lett-in may be less of a problem. He further sta.ted he was sensitive to the County guidelines. -24- City Administrator TOM :i ea e:s: ; t•ated that Doris Wilkins has just telephoned him and she sta:ec :sii:e wag :opposed to the median cut as an APC member and a resident.. The developer stated there was already a median cut to the west of Blackhawk. He stated the agreement was signed under duress. Councilmember Wachter stated the ball was in the County's court and felt that the median would eliminate u -turns. He felt there would be a detriment in the traffic cutting in. Gustafson moved, Wachter se0onded, the motion to approve allow the petitioner to go to the Dakota County Board of Commissioners with no reccomendation from the Clty::• 444041gx., Gustafson, Ellison and McCrea voted in favor; Egan was• tippos•ed. ORDINANCE AMENDMENT TO CHAPTER 4/CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY City Administrator Tom Hedges stated that during the spring of 1988, Chapter 4 of the City Code was amended that required a Certificate of Survey for the exps ii:s:iQ:n of any existing residential structure within the community, • fte:r the ordinance was adopted and after additional review by. the City :staff, it was determined that the ordinance was far too restrictive and did not address the concerns originally expressed by the Prcfeetive Inspections Department. Mr. Hedges stated that at the last City Co•uwcil meeting the annual ordinance codification was updated and the City Attorney's office was directed to prepare modifications to Chapter 4 regarding a change in the Certificate of Survey requirement. Wachter moved, Egan seconded, the motion to approve an ordinance entitled "Construction Licensing Permits and Regulation, Including Fines, Excavations and Mobir.e :Ii:ote..Pa;'its:" by requirements for a surveyor's certificate for :new cdnatruction and by adopting by reference Eagan City Code, chapter 1 and Section 4.99. Wachter, Ellison, McCrea and Egan voted in. favor; Gustafson was opposed. EXTENSION 0? 41iA : ?i10/OAR CLIFF POND Gustafson moved, McCrea seconded, the motion to continue indefinitely the extension of the preliminary plat for Oak Cliff Pond 2nd Addition to allow for staff review. All voted in favor. CURBS]DE.• :REC,Itc PROGRAM City Administrator Toihffiedges stated that the Solid Waste Abatement Commission had been meeting ot:a regular basis to explore, review, research and consider a c.urbs•i•de• recycling program for the City of Eagan. At its meet xi :. iF 'A igg.5:t .23, 1988, the Commission recommended that the City Confit l adopt 'a modified open hauling approach to implementing the curbside recycling program. It was -25- recommended that the City Counej.1 accept the modified open hauling alternative for implementaU O0..cif: tcu:r : de recycling prior to April 1, 1989. Jon Hohenstein recognized the Solid Waste Abatement Commission members. He updated the Council on the Commission's actions. He stated there was substantial incentive for fast action on the matter. Councilmember Egan asked what the capital outlay would be for the project. Mr. Hohenstetn stated there would be a need to buy the containers. He outlined other options. Mr. Egan questioned what type of container. Mr. Hohenstein stated the container would hold approximately one week's tubbish.. An industry spokesman- St:atee:d :ne.: t:ty must make a choice. The proposal would eliminate people having a freedom of choice. He stated that minimizing the trucks was not compatible with freedom of choice. Mr. Hohenstein stated that there would be a need for an ordinance amendment. Mr. Hedges stated the Council should give time for the BFI lawsuit decision. Gustafson moved, Egan :s:e:conded,. the motion to approve adoption of the recommendation of the .Solid Waste Abatement Commission to accept the modified open hadljing::a1.ternative for implementation of curbside recycling prior to April .1.; 1:9:8.9, subject to periodic review by the City Council. All voted in fai r.. Councilmember Wachter asked it if would be curbside and not plant separation. Mr. Hedges stated he was correct. Councilmember McCrea questioned the cost to the City in staff time. Mr. Hohenstein explained the diminishing County reimbursement. SPECIAL PERMIT/TEMPORAI2y' O —SITg ADVERTISING SIGN/TOWNHOMES OF HILLANDALE Wachter moved, Gustafson seconded, the motion to approve the special permit for a tempoi:azy.•.adv:e:ng sign for the townhomes of Hillandale, subject to the •f•rslloivingg conditions: 1. A one-time fee of $2.50 per square foot shall be paid. 2. All other applicable City .ordinances shall be adhered to. All voted in favor. Mayor Ellison suggested the City may want to examine the signs in the future. • -26- SPECIAL PERMIT/TEMOQMRr .S N/BURNSVILLE LUMBER COMPANY Gustafson moved, Ega:n::seconded, the motion to approve the special permit for a temporary advertising sign for Burnsville Lumber Company, subject to the following conditions: 1. A one-time fee of $2.50 per square foot shall be paid. 2. The sign shall be:ro more than 4' by 4' and may only be erected and maintained between 4;pril 1 and November 1, 1988. 3. The sign may be only erected and maintained within a one-half mile radius of the unident4t:3:e t: 40 1:t :*ent. 4. All other applicable City ordinances shall be adhered to. Wachter, Gustafson, Ellison and Egan voted in favor; McCrea was opposed. SPECIAL PERMIT/TEMPORARY ADV'4TYS:YNG SIGN/SIENNA CORPORATION City Administrator Tctm Hedges stated the Sienna Corporation had requested a special permit to• •allow 'an existing sign to remain located in Outlot H, advertisihg40d4 homes in the Eagan Hills Farms development. The sign is located at t#o• intersection of Bridle Ridge Road and Wescott Road. Mr. Hedges stated a separate application for a special permit was submitted by Sienna Corporation for Outlot J to allow their existing sign to remain located at the intersection of Elrene Road and Wescott Road. Mayor Ellison questioned .t.he need .for both signs. Mr. Runkle stated there were entrances tx:Qnt two• d:j ferent points. Mr. Egan questioned why they had not: appl i:ect• f irst. Wachter moved, McCrea:•seconded, the motion to approve one special permit for Sienna •Co:rpoxa:tion to allow one existing sign to remain at either Outlot H, BxidletidAddition or Outlot J, Bridleridge Addition, subject t� the following conditions: 1. A $2.50 square foot fee be paid to the City. 2. This sign shall be removed one year from the date of the City Council approval. 3. This sign shall meet,all Code r':equirements. All voted in favor. WAIVER OF .0 0014. :H::. .(RACE CORPORATION Egan moved, McCrea seconded, the motion to approve the Waiver of Plat for B. H. Grace Corpo:t:ation. All voted in favor. VARIANCE/NEW HORIZON HOMES City Administrator Tom Hedges stated an application has been submitted by New Horizon Bomes requesting a 2.33 -foot variance to the minimum 30 -foot required $: :tback: from public right-of-way for Lots 14 and 15, Block 2, Thomas Lake He.ghts. Councilmember Egan state 3..h.e. felt the matter was thin on hardship. The applicant st.h:ted. t:h.e foux lots have been setting for four years. Mayor Ellison questioned why the building was not set back. The developer stated it was too far to the rear. Egan moved, McCrea seconded, the motion to approve the variance for a 2.33 -foot setback where a minimuxn..of 30 feet is required from public right-of-way. Gustafson, E11i:s01-4 McCrea, and Egan voted in favor; Wachter was opposed. WAIVER OF PLAT/S.PLIT LOTS EAGANDALE CENTER City Administrator Tom Hedges .sti3:t.ed a public hearing was held by the Advisory Planning Commission at:their August 30, 1988, meeting to consider a Waiver of Plat in order to split Lots 14 and 16, Block 7 of the Eagandale Center Industrial Park and combine them into two lots consisting of 7.2 acres and a conditional use permit for outside storage and a pylon sign located along the west service road in the east half of Section 3. The APC recommended approval of both applications to the City Council, Mayor Ellison questioned of the outside storage was a benefit. Bob Worthington (Opus: Oorpo$ation) concurred with the staff requirements. He stated the outside ztar•age which was located by the railroad tracks was used by.:GE W4$: tot visible from the freeway. He stated the conditional use permit would give the Council control. Gustafson moved, Wachter seconded, the motion to approve the Waiver of Plat in order to split Lots 14 and 16, Block 7, of the Eagandale Center Industrial Paic:k:.and..00mbine into two outlots totaling 7.2 acres, subject t i'•the .fdll.awing conditions: 1. The development limit its storm water outflow into the City storm sewer to 0.5 cfs. 2 Theroposed entrar�e$.$•.•.0 .:: 11c right-of-way are required to be 30 feet wide with concrete valley gutters. -28- 3. All public street$. .a:nd: tt.]:x:t:;:o45 necessary to provide service to this development shall.be designed by a registered professional engineer in accordance wi:h. City Codes and engineering standards and policies and approved by :r•t•aff prior to recording of Waiver. 4. A detailed grading, drainage, erosion and sediment control plan must be prepared in accordance with current City standards and approved by staff prior to recording of Waiver. 5. If any public impr•vvements are to be installed under a City contract, the appropriate.arojeet. must be approved by Council action prior to recording of Waiver. 6. This development sh:s]:1 :he :responsible for the acquisition of all regulatory agency permits in the time frame required by the affected agency. 7. All signs shall be subject to the one-time sign fee of $2.50 per square foot. 8. The developer and owner :of the southerly portion of Lot 14 shall combine this parcel :off..L•and with the southerly portion of Lot 16 under one tax identification parcel number with the Dakota County Auditor. All voted in favor. Gustafson moved, Egan seconded, the motion to approve a conditional use permit for Opus Corporation to allow outside storage. All voted in favor. Gustafson moved, Wachtet : O?onde4,. the motion to approve a pylon sign for Opus Corporation :Cg: the :o:Q:ix•thern Parcel A of Eagandale Center Industrial Park. All voted. in favor. PRELIMINARY PLAT/SENECA PLANT ADDITION City Administrator Tom'•' {edges s•t•&t•e•d a public hearing was held by the Advisory Planning Commission at their regular meeting held on August 23, 1988, to consider a preliminary plat consisting of 87.83 acres for the expansion of the Seneca Waste Water Treatment Plant. The APC recommended denial of the .plat. City Planner Dale Runkle' ,updated. he Council on the matter and stated there were three rea:sgns the AP::•denied the project: 1. The west expansion:,. 3. The grades of peat. The Metropolitan Waste- Co'ntroI Coinmission provided an additional memo to the Council. Bob Isaacson (MWCC) outlined the history of the project for the Council. He stated the MWCC has taken the following steps: 1. They have implemented an odor control in the past and are expending $3 million in future expansion. 2. They have pinpointed the :Odor sources. 3. They have explored espan•sior. to the east. However, the western expansion is prefetre0f0 :hhidx.aulic and other uses. 4. They have provided for the installation of an after -burner in the incinerator. He also addressed the flood plains. concerns and other APC concerns. He stated they have compl±.ei with the preliminary platting requirements. He also outlined.:t:h.e: 4tivantages of the MWCC proposal. Councilmember Gustafson .referred to page 207 of Mr. Edward J. DeLaForest of the MWCC, whi. h .Stated the mirror image plan would not work. He asked the developer to .e4p30. n the discrepancy. The developer stated they could go east b.0 - all needed facilities would not fit to the east. He stated the east would be least efficient. He further stated the cost is not an over-riding issue. Paul Moritz (HDR) stated that to go east there would be graae problems. He stated that splitting the plant was not desirable and that going west was best based -on the. these considerations. Mayor Ellison stated .40 was concerned about Eagan becoming too much of a receiver of sewage. He felt that they may be taking more than their fair share. The developer stated there were: iia future expansions planned and that there were no plans to become "Pigs Eye". Councilmember McCrea asked how long after the expansion would the facility be at capacity. The developer stated twenty years. McCrea questioned if other opia0$ **re explored. The developer stated it would not make seee: He stated some of the options would be to phase the plant out, :build a neW ;plant or ship to "Pigs Eye". Councilmember Gustaf6.0.4 questioned::What rights the City would have to deny the project. •0;tty` At:tor:n:e r .iim Sheldon stated he could not give a definitive answe .:p:ut.. : ' 1;• ent standards, etc., could not -30- be set. He stated the Citi .C4:u1d::c44tr:oi platting to a reasonable degree. Gustafson stated he .40.1t Seneca may not be a good neighbor in the area of the odor problem and questioned why it had not been handled sooner. The developer stated the controls to the present have been stop gap in nature. He stated odor control is a very complicates procedure. Gustafson asked why the matter had not been controlled in the past. Councilmember Egan asked what controls would the City have if the development expanOed and :they don't keep their odor control promises. Betty Bassett, 2101 YJiithering Heights Road, stated she felt there was not enough prel iiY nasty : flfggpa:tion obtained. She recapped the APC's impressions. She also' 'h'ahaed Out newspaper articles dealing with the MPCC lawsuit. She stated she was frustrated with the public comment procedures for environmental impact agencies. She further questioned the zoning. She felt there were vague threats not to remove the smell unless the development was approved. She requested denial and postponement of a decision* Councilmember Wachter •stAted.:he felt the matter should either be continued or denied because •of the late hour. Mayor Ellison questioned if the matter sh.o•u.d. .be discussed at the next meeting. The public stated they felt the matte .b:o.uld be continued at this meeting. Councilmember Wachter stated the problems existed for 18 years. Councilmember McCrea stated she felt there should be a continuance in order to address the neighborhood concerns. Ted Tennis, 2135 Wutherinx..Height•s• .#toad, questioned the peat mound height. He further questadte.d: toe• .east expansion and stated that Eagan was getting a 14ger sewage plant. Al Errins, 2133 Silver Bell, questioned what percentage of the smell would be eliminated.B.e 4L.0ha.d..concerns regarding the peat mounds and stated charcoal :f see 4 44.4i.Apt work. He further stated he felt he had lost home value. Mike Hazel, 2129 Silver Bell, stated that the residents were in the area before the Seneca Treatment Plant. Mayor Ellison requested•t:h:at *Mt:.. Runkle address the zoning concern. Mr. Runkle stated the comprehsti:sive guide plan called for LI zoning. Councilmember Gustafson questioned which residential area would be phased out. Mr. Runkle stated the homeowners would gradually be phased out. Councilmembe•t Egan que$ti•Oned if this was a permitted use for LI zoning. Mr. Runkle .•state4 :the history of the plant tends to support the correct zonfn.g•. • •• -31- Doug Warner (developer..)• •s-ta.ted. the.x'e was no wetland authority over the area. Councilmember Wachte: :stated that the McKey Plant was also in the middle of LI zoning. Councilmember McCrea said she was leaning towards a motion to deny the preliminary plat. Councilmember Egan stated he was trying to be objective and that the expansion was largely usecl :by Eagan. He further stated he could not think of terms to control the MWCC. He felt they must be able to show their ability to control the odor first. Mayor Ellison stated :h:e.:i:elt.:th:e muter should be continued to allow MWCC to do their research. Councilmember Wachter stated he felt a two-month continuance or whenever the MWCC was ready to come back before the Council was in order. Councilmember issue. He felt the requested esthetic west. Gustafson stated the. :odor problem is a separate odor problem ne.e:de:tl :to be resolved and also he considerat.i:oi. '•r the expansion were to be to the Councilmember Wachter stated •the peat should not be allowed to pile up. Mayor Ellison stated the tito.s:e:o.t plan should be improved now. City Administrator Tom Hedges stated the MWCC should grant continuance. Bruce Baumann, Precinct Commissioner, stated he could not commit to the extension. Mayor E1],.issil.,.ste,t:e4:.he should consent to the continuance or the Council•.: fiould 4e:ny- the proposal. Mr. Baumann agreed to a 60 -day contintance. CQ•iuncilmember Egan suggested an examination of the re -zoning as well. City Administrator suggested either November 1 or November 15 40r the re -hearing. Wachter moved, Gustat•son seCOnde•c , •a motion to continue the matter until the November 1, 1988, City Council meeting. All voted in favor. PRELIMINARY PLAT/WES.COTT SQUARE ADDITION City Administrator Tom. fledges' steted a public hearing was held by the Advisory Planning Commission at #leir July 26, 1988, meeting to consider a preliminary plat entitled.Wescott Square Addition, consisting of 71 owner -occupied townhouses of 9.83 previously zoned R-3 acres. He stated them ;t:t-e .gra$ Go:o:tjnued by the APC to their August 23, 1988, meeting to..eddt:ess.•:i:o:u:r .specific points: -32- 1. To obtain a tree census .r. egar,ding the location and types of trees. 2. To review the playground issue regarding tot lots. 3. To review the issue regarding the open space and a reduction of the density. 4. To review and clarify the ordinance question. Mayor Ellison questioned how* many of the units would be under 6,000. Mr. Runkle stated aproxi:ately 51. Councilmember McCrea questioned if they were public or private streets. She further questioned if the private .street.$ had been deducted. Mr. Runkle stated private streets are :tto:t.:de,dia:ct:::. Councilmember Egan questioned if the green space had been resolved. Mr. Runkle stated yes. The developer stated the neighborhood concerns had been addressed. He further outlined the pr • :s for the Council. Councilmember Gustafson. :stated that 55 would be under the requirement but that the total average was above 6,000. He asked if it was rental property. The •dev:e,;.o_per stated no, it was owner -occupied. Mayor Ellison stated he was uncomfortable with the small size. The developer stated the outlots are subtracted from the size. Mr. Gustafson stated that ownership requires 6,000. He stated 3,000 plus is a significant variance. City Planner Dale Runkle stated it would meet the requirements if a different platting technique were used. Mr. Egan stated he felt that :.tey were::still below the maximum for the site. Mayor Ellison que•s:tic n'od :tilos' 'inside square footage. The developer stated it was 17:x:4: and :U,pward. Egan moved, Gustafson• seconded, the motion to approve the preliminary plat for Wescott 44:4r:o :id•d::•tion/New Horizon Homes of 9.83 R-3 zoned acres for 71.: a:n3't:s:; at j.acent to Yankee Doodle and Elrene Road, subject to the following conditions: 1. These standard conditions of plat approval as adopted by Council action on September 15, 1987, shall be complied with: Al, B1, B2, B3, B4, Cl, C2, C3, C4, C5 -e: '71.x.:;1 f Fl, and G1. 2. A copy of the townhtttise bylaws :shall be submitted to the City Attorney for review. 3. The developer shall:: pmpiy :w:ith' .al.l ordinance amendments approved on July 5, 1988 if:c udi: g:.exter'4or finish, garage size, and impervious surface coverage. -33- 4. All trash shall b4 -contained in the garages until the day of pickup. 5. The drainage Swale• al.ci ig the. southerly portion of Block 3 will not be allowed. 6. The Development 18 required to submit engineering documentation for staff review and approval for the proposed retaining wall. 7. The Development is :required to contain ponding areas entirely within the boundaries of the Development. 8. The Development is requited to provide a 4 cfs storm sewer outlet and a sanitary sewer serv.i..ce stub to Parcel #013-01. 9. The Development is requited to provide individual sewer and water service to each proposed unit. 10. Council authorization of a public improvement to provide the downstream storm sewer system and upgrade Kost and Elrene Roads to the appropriate urban section is requii.t:ed prior to final plat approval. All voted in favor. MODEL HOME PERMIT/Wf10DLANDS 2ND ADDITION Gustafson moved, Egan seconded, the motion to approve a model home permit for Lot 7, Block 1, Woodlands 2nd Addition. All voted in favor. DISTRIBUTION/1988 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE City Administrator To :ii:e lge4: Ota•tid that in accordance with past Council direction and :budgetary allocations, the consulting engineering firm of Bonestrbo Rosene Anderlik & Associates, Inc. had completed a most recent rev:;ksion •aid update to the comprehensive plans for the City sanitary •4ewet.• •a:n:p• water infrastructure system. He stated formal Council revi;aw•. •a .d .approval would be scheduled for the October 6, 1988, Council meeting. There was no action necessary on this item. PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AGROMEW/COMPREHENSIVE GUIDE PLAN AMENDMENT/RAHNCLIFF 2ND ADDI'y`ION/1hlOtu COMPANIES This matter was Item 6: on the consent agenda. Councilmember Egan stated .he w.as •ii :comfortable with the matter being on the consent agenda;. HQ.: .t the summary did not address the -34- Council concerns. City Ac histrator Tom Hedges stated he had questioned if the matter should be on the consent agenda and the Council had agreed. He stated :pe:r:.hags it was incorrect to not include the PD agreement. . Egan stated the traf lc concerns were not addressed on the summary. Mr. Hedges stated.:he should have prepared an executive summary for the Council. Councilmember Egan asked Mr. Colbert about the transportation study and the intersection problems. Mr. Colbert stated he was not aware of any site specifi:e: traff.jc analysis. However, they could be performed. There was much discussion concerning the technique of the consent agenda approval. Councilmember Egan stated he would like to see the summary before the approval of the matter. Mr. Hedges stated the developer is concerned about the timing. Egan moved, Ellison seconded, the.:rotion to continue the comprehensive guide plan amendments ::e'Z:oning of 16.8 LB and RB acres to a commercial planned devel.o:pie :district and a preliminary plat for Rahncliff 2nd Addition.:d:iitil 7:Q:0 p.m. at the September 13, 1988, City Council meeting. Wachter.,. Gustafson, Ellison and Egan voted in favor; McCrea was opposed. COOOC lrnem.ber Wachter did not vote. G. 0. FIRE FACILITY BONDS/G. b'. :LQDIPMENT CERTIFICATES OF INDEBTEDNESS OF 1988 City Administrator Tom Hedges stated there was a need for two resolutions regarding the bonds. Gustafson moved, Egan :se: i i ied,. the motion to approve a resolution relating to the .ssuan:ee. of G. 0. Fire Facility bonds, Series 1988 B. All voted is is favor -4. Egan moved, Gustafson. zecon2 :d, the motion to approve a resolution awarding the se ,:e: of 1:534 .irUlion G. 0. Equipment Certificates of Indebtedness' Of 13$$.: A:'1 voted in favor. 1989 BUDGET Copies of the draft 1989 budget were presented to the Councilmembers. . A special City Council.4teeting was scheduled for September 13, 1988, to discuss the draft.1989 budget..: • -35- •COUNCIL DISCUSSION Councilmember Gustaf ox tated. h• • felt Astleford should give up the RB zoning voluntarily,. .otherwise the zoning should be changed. Mayor Ellison requested the staff investigate the concern. Councilmember Egan stated he felt the Council should consider not having meetings after Labor Day. Councilmember McCrea had concerns regarding the speed limit on Galaxie Road in Eagan. Public Works Director Tom Colbert stated the sign would be- changed. It was questioned whether the Lexington South Tri -Land letter had been sent. Mr. Colbert $tart 4: p4r:t •of the HUD property was tied up in a title dispute and . htat. i•n.Silrance• would be called regarding the issue. Councilmember McCrea stated she would like a breakdown of the park costs on an annual basis. She felt the budget was too high. BILLS: Gustafson moved, Egan..a0oonded, the motion to approve the checklist dated September 6, .x.988, in the amount of $1,968,816.38. All voted in favor. ADJOURNMENT' Upon motion duly made by Gustafson, seconded by Egan, the meeting was adjourned at 2:47 a.m. All voted in favor. CITY OF EAGAN By: Eugene VanOverbeke Its: City Clerk September 1, 1988 Mr. Thomas Colvert Director of Public Works City of Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55122 Dear Mr. Colvert: Thanks for making me awa•r'.e. o:f •tfie <s:p:ptr'•:tunity for becoming a committee member for the Eagan Water Quality Management Program. Although I have only been an Eagan property owner for a short while, I have spent a good deal of time investigating the possibility of obtaining federal and/or state funding for the cleaning the lake.s• of Eagan. I would be delighted to discuss some of 010 ittformation I have relating to the available fedtt4i. aia:d' state programs we might qualify for. 1 look forward to helping fliHMly Way possible to acquire some of the funding and also to••t o ill . with other members of our community in meeting our goals for. g•rotecting, maintaining and improving Eagan's very valuable water resources. I'll be looking forward to hearing about the committee's decision as to approval of my membership. Please call me at 853-7820 at your earliest convenience. Thanks again. I appreciate your conside. c flA of .my •aO:plication. Sincerely, Barb Agne ..:iter C. H4 .:.:r.c r 1341 1 &cher r r. r;5122 2 EL„t. 1)33 11or:or::ble, .__vor no Council City of �3;3 i ]lot 1•r.00 EH': C1e rview I: prOVL.Ltntc :ro.:Lct 14545, File 1149.44k hor.or;.:ble .•.your• •1nd Council; I u.:. i:: fl.vor of the street it provemonts proposed for bei cher Lr. Lt:nore in Cleurview erudition. I wuc in favor of the improveientc in 1979 ti:i.cn it wss .Jro..oceu. .•.y ..ire and I do object to. #* . btrc;ry ascecce:aent of all the lots e( wally rather tr.un by the tithe honorer method of the front foot LyctLU.. Your: Truk; ..r. .nit.r C. 1;acf�r Dalt a. :-etere•on 13'1% bL ecner Lr. r; sin, ,•,1; `51?2 ::lock 2, Lot 3 Clearview Additj441.. ronorable Mayor and Council City of e:In c lot Ynob Ra. L _� r. , ,•:i 55127 Re: Clearview.addition 6trtet Improvements Project -,A5, F'ilc: 40464 honorable ,•mayor ana Council: 2 Sep. 1946 I am in favor of the etreeti• :i; k4nii0101 ;y proposed in project nbr. �ti5 however I do have sorzrc due•s•ti•b:1 'and objections wnich I would like broufht before the Council. They are as follows; 1. T'r.e unassessed cost from Project 472 of 5 5/d4) in the sum of w9,;, should be borne by the State of Minn. DCT. As I understand it a portion of Block 1 adjacent to Blackhaw.k:::jd. was used by the State to :.cco.radate the Eden Aadition. I ol?je.ct ±. r tY.e fact that the reeidente• of Clearview are being asked to sub -000 tt;e(I.1II:1\ DOT). 2. I object to the uropo'sa.l •t at eact lot be esseee•ed the ane amount ree5rdlees of the front foot •&., x 4.o .not desire to subsidize oversize ana cornor lots. i. It is my understanding that when the sewer and wrter were installed in 1Q73 the City of Ea:tan was due a penalty refund from the contractor. This sum would then have been applied to the coat ofstreet having at the time had the residents so elected. In my opinion the reeiaente of Clearview Addition should still be e.ntitled to have this sum hpplied to the current Projeo1: ;f 4 4, .Z ti‘.4ove tnis question cestrve:. an "newer, thank you. bin- e ly : Dale A. reterson Ernest F. Horning 1835 Beecher Drive Eagan, Mn 55122 Block 1 lot 4 Clearview Addition Honoraabl e Mayor and Coups. i 1, City of Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, Mn 55122 Re: Clearview Addition Ctreet Improvements Project No. 545 Dear Mayor and Council: I am in favor of the proposed street improvements proposed in Project No, 545. I do however have the following objections, 1) The recommendation to assess project No. 545 for the $9,334 of unassessed cost from Proj...c:t. No. 472. These costs should be borne by the Minnesota. 'I1bT'.;. 2) The proposal to divid:e. the total cost by the number of lots in the project. The 011:era1 method of assesment is by the front footage. I do nest e:e .1. should be required to subsidize those who chose to builr'1.•0.. . :orner lots. Sincerily, Ernest F. Horning