08/16/1988 - City Council RegularAGENDA
REGULAR MEETING
EAGAN CITY COUNCIL
EAGAN, MINNESOTA
MUNICIPAL CENTER BUILDING
AUGUST 16, 1988
6:30 P.M.
I. 6:30 - ROLL CALL & PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE (BLUE)
II. 6:35 - ADOPT AGENDA & APPROVAL OF MINUTES (BLUE)
III. 6:45 - DEPARTMENT HEAD BUSINESS (BLUE)
A. PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT
p, \ 1. Recommendation/Park Names
IV. 6:55 - CONSENT AGENDA (PINK)
f7.. A. LICENSES, Plumbers
,p. L' B. LICENSE, Water Softener
1
..L1 C. ADDENDUM to List of Election Judges for Primary Election
.(v D. LICENSE, Gambling Renewal, Lions Club of Eagan/Cedarvale Lanes Inc
A1E. SALE of Police Squad #3
p a F. PROJECT 551, Petition/Order Feasibility Report & Detail Plans (Remick
1�Addition - Utilities)
�.� G. CONTRACT 87-39, Approve Change Order #4 (Fire Station #4)
p (3 H. BUDGET, Gun Club Watershed Mgmt Organization
irl)"S I. CONTRACT 88-25, Receive Bids/Award Contract (South Dodd Road - Overlay
�'j J. PROJECT 547A, Contract 88-31, Receive Report/Approve Plans/ Authorize
4'Advertisement for Bids (Well #12)
.�.1 K. CONTRACT 88-30, Approve Plans/Authorize Advertisement for Bids (South
Oaks - Streets & Utilities)
?;.2.2- L. PROJECT 552, Receive Petition/Order Feasibility Report (ECIP#3-
`' Watermain and Storm Sewer)
.1 . FINAL PLAT, Beau D Rue Drive
P1�r N.FINAL PLAT, Hosford Addition
• a 6 0. PROJECT 543, Receive Feasibility Report/Order Public Hearing (Prettyman
P' Heights)
xP. FINAL PLAT, Town Centre 70 Tenth Addition
e,,2,g Q. VACATION, Partial Right -of -Way, Receive Petition/Schedule Public Hearing
(Mendota Wagon Road)
fa. a R. VACATION, Partial Right -of -Way, Receive Petition/Schedule Public Hearing
(Portion of Cedarvale Drive)
Z 9S. DELINQUENT Weed Cutting Bills, Receive Assessment Roll/Order Public
Hearing
r, et . DELINQUENT Utility Bills, Receive Assessment Roll/Order Public Hearing
V. 7:00 - PUBLIC HEARINGS (SALMON)
PROJECT 478, Final Assessment Hearing (Lexington Hill - Sanitary Sewer)
To Be Continued to September 6, 1988
PROJECT 479, Final Assessment Hearing (Lexington/Northview Park -Trunk
Storm Sewer) To Be Continued to September 6, 1988
r.32 -C. PROJECT 461, Final Assessment Hearing (Yankee Doodle Road - I -35E to
«3H.
re 1"'
.t4 J.
XI.
PROJECT 544, Mallard Park 3rd Addition - Streetlights
PARTIAL VACATION of Public Right -Of -Way, Cedarvale Boulevard
OLD BUSINESS (ORCHID)
VARIANCES for Parking Lot Improvements (Cedarvale Boulevard)
COMPREHENSIVE GUIDE PLAN AMENDMENT, Rahncliff 2nd Addition/Austin
Companies, REZONING of 16.08 LB (Limited Business) and RB (Roadside
Business) Acres to a Commercial Planned Development District and a
PRELIMINARY PLAT Located at SW Intersection of Cliff Road and Hwy 35E in
NWS of Sec 32
NEW BUSINESS (TAN)
ESTABLISH Bond Sale Date for $1,850,000 General Obligation Fire
Stations, Land and Equipment Bonds and $13,400,000 Special Assessment
General Obligation Public Improvement Bonds of 1988
CODIFICATION OF 1988 City Code Amendments
CONSIDERATION, Wescott Hills Federal Tax Credit
VARIANCE, Scott and Ann Strommen, a 10' Variance to the 30' Setback from
Public Right -of -Way, Located at 4036 Northview Terrace, Lot 11, Black 3,
Lexington Parkview
SPECIAL PERMIT, Eagan Christian Center/Cedar Industrial Park RLS,
Requesting Two Year Extension to Their Special Permit to Allow a Church
Facility in a I-1 District, Located East of Shawnee Road on Kennebec
Drive
WAIVER OF PLAT, Zachman Brother Construction Co, Inc, Duplex Lot Split
to Allow Individual Ownership on Lot 6, Block 1, Cinnamon Ridge 6th
Addition
PRELIMINARY PLAT (Replat), Cedar Cliff Commercial Park 5th
Addition/Federal Land Co, of 4.69 Acres and Two Lots Zoned NB
(Neighborhood Business) Within the Cedar Cliff Commercial Park Planned
Development Located at the NE Intersection of Cliff and Nicols Road in
SE 1/4 of Sec 30
PRELIMINARY PLAT, Highview Park Addition/Mildred S. Hanson, Consisting
of Three Lots on 2.27 R-1 (Single Family) Acres Located South of
Highview Avenue and West of Pilot Knob Road in SE 1/4 of Sec 4
PRELIMINARY PLAT, Woodlands 2nd Addition/Robert Engstrom Co, Consisting
of 12 Lots on 7.35 R-1 (Single Family) Acres Located North of Basswood
Lane in SE 1/4 of Sec 14
REZONING, Suncrest Addition/William
Acres to an R-1 (Single Family)
Consisting of 16 Lots Located North
Street in SE 1/4 of Sec 14
Huttner, of 10.53 A (Agricultural)
District and a PRELIMINARY PLAT
of Sunwood Trail and South of Birch
ADDITIONAL ITEMS (GOLD)
ADMINISTRATIVE AGENDA (GREEN)
VISITORS TO BE HEARD (for those persons not
ADJOURNMENT
on agenda)
MEMO TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIIMEMBERS
FROM: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES
DATE: AUGUST 10, 1988
SUBJECT: AGENDA INFORMATION FOR AUGUST 16, 1988 CITY COUNCIL
MEETING
_ADOPT AGENDA APPROVE. MINUTES
After approval is given to the August 16, 1988 agenda and regular
City Council meeting minutes for the August 2, 1988 City Council
meeting, the following items are in order for consideration.
DEPARTMENT READ:BUSINESS
A. PARRS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT
Item 1. Recommendation/Park Names --At its regular meeting on
August 4, 1988, the Advisory Parks and Recreation Commission
recommended official park names for City parks in six park
service areas. A copy of the recommen ations toget er with a
service area map are enclosed on pages through
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the
official park names for parks in six park service areas as
recommended by the Advisory Parks and Recreation Commission.
MEMORANDUM
TO: TOM HEDGES, CITY ADMINISTRATOR
FROM: KEN VRAA, DIRECTOR OF PARKS AND RECREATION
DATE: AUGUST 5, 1988
RE: OFFICIAL PARK NAMES
Al: it's August 4, 1988 Commission meeting, the Advisory Parks and Recreation
Commission reviewed proposed park names for parks that have not been
o'ficially named to date. The Commission would like to make the following
recommendations:
1. Park Service Section 31W - Now identified as Winkler/Jackson
RECOMMENDATION: SLATER ACRES PARK
2. Park Service Section 31E - Now identified as Vienna Woods Park:
RECOMMENDATION: KETTLE PARK
3. Park Service Section 34 - Now identified as Ohmann:
RECOMMENDATION: GEORGE OHMANN PARK
4. Park Service Section 16 - Now identified as Blue Cross/Blue
Shield:
RECOMMENDATION: SKYLINE PARK
5. Park Service Section 14 - Now identified as Woodlands School/Park:
RECOMMENDATION: MUELLER FARM PARK
6. Park Service Section 23 - Now identified as Bridle Ridge:
RECOMMENDATION: BRIDLE RIDGE PARK (FOR THE 18 ACRE PARK)
WANDERING WALK PARK (FOR THE OPEN SPACE/GREEN
BELT AREA OF PARK)
3
es,
Agenda Information Memo
August 16, 1988, City Council Meeting
CONSENT AGENDA
There are twenty (20) items on the agenda referred to as consent
items requiring one (1) motion by the City Council. If the City
Council wishes to discuss any of the items in further detail,
those items should be removed from the Consent Agenda and placed
under Additional Items unless the discussion required is brief.
A.
are
PLUMBERS LICENSES
Plumbers Licenses --There are four (4) plumbers licenses
in order for consideration:
Hokanson Plumbing, Inc.
Nordic Services, Inc.
TEK Mechanical Services
United Water and Sewer Co.
They have all complied with City Code
licensing of plumbers.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM:
plumbers licenses as presented.
that
provisions regarding the
To approve the four (4)
WATER SOFTENER LICENSE
B. Water Softener License --An application from Milbert Company
doing business as Culligan Water Conditioning is in order for
consideration. It has complied with all City Code provisions
regarding the licensing of water softening firms.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the water
softener license for Milbert Company, dba, Culligan Water
Conditioning as presented.
ADDENDUM/ELECTION JUDGES/PRIMARY ELECTION
C. Approve Addendum to List of Election Judges for Primary
Election --At its regular meeting on August 2, 1988, the City
Council approved a list of election judges for the September 13,
1988 primary. In addition to the approved list, the City is
informed th..t additional persons wish to serve in this capacity.
On page S you will find an addendum to the primary election
judge list indicating the names of those persons.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the
addendum to the list of election judges for the September 13,
1988 primary election.
ADDENDUM TO PRIMARY ELECTION JUDGES
August 16, 1988
DEMOCRATS
Oliver McCulloch
Kirstin McCleary
Walter Lawrence
Janet Schuetze
Kathleen Daly
INDEPENDENTS REPUBLICANS
JoAnn Bloch
Gladys Byrnes
Jean Kimber
Marcia Miller
Agenda Information Memo
August 16, 1988, City Council Meeting
GAMBLING LICENSE RENEWAL/LIONS CLUB OF EAGAN
CEDARVALE LANES. INCORPORATED
D. Gambling License Renewal, Lions Club of Eagan/Cedarvale
Lanes, Incorporated --An application for renewal of a gambling
license has been received of the Eagan's Lion Club to continue
its pull -tab operation at Cedarvale Lanes, Inc. The license was
originally approved by the Eagan City Council on October 6, 1987
and was issued by the State of Minnesota on October 15, 1987.
The application for renewal has been reviewed by City staff and
the Police Department and is found in order for consideration at
this time.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the
application for renewal of gambling license by the Lions Club of
Eagan operating at Cedarvale Lanes, Inc.
Agenda Information Memo
August 16, 1988, City Council Meeting
SALE OF VEHICLE
E. Receive Bid, Award Sale of Squad #3 --The Police Department is
requesting the designation of squad #3 as surplus property.
Squad #3 is a 1985 Ford with 80,000 miles to be sold for $1,511
to Suburban Auto, the only bidder.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To designate squad #3 as
surplus property and sell it to Suburban Auto Sales for $1,511.
7
Agenda Information Memo
August 16, 1988, City Council Meeting
PROJ 551/RECEIVE PETITION/REMICK ADDITION
F. Project 551, Receive Petition/Order Feasibility Report &
Detailed Plans (Remick Addition - Utilities) --Staff has received
a petition from the developer of the one -lot subdivision known as
Remick Addition, at the south end of Highridge Terrace,
requesting the preparation of a feasibility report and
simultaneous preparation of detailed plans and specifications for
the extension of sanitary sewer and water main facilities to
handle the proposed subdivision. The petition incorporated the
appropriate guarantee of costs incurred if, for some reason, the
project is not approved at the time of the public hearing.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To receive the petition
and authorize the preparation of a feasibility report and
detailed plans for Project 551 (Remick Addition - Utilities).
CONTRACT 87-39/CHANGE ORDER #4/FIRE STATION #4
G. Contract 87-39, Approve Change Order #4 (Fire Station #4) --
Staff has received a request to process a Change Order to the
contract for the construction of Fire Station #4 to incorporate
several modifications that wer necessary to complete this
facility. Enclosed on pages " through I: is a copy of
the explanation of the additional costs totalling $1,727.28.
This has been reviewed by both the architect and the fire chief
and found to be in order for favorable consideration by the
Council.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve Change Order #4
to Contract 87-39 (Fire Station #4) for an additional amount of
$1,727.28 and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute all
related documents.
8
A RT HUR DICKEY ARCHITECTS, i kC'.
. �R( 11 1 11:.(.'I U RE
PLANNING
I N 1 L.RIOKS
18 July 1988
CITY OF EAGAN
P.O. Box 21199
3830 Pilot Knob Road
Eagan, NN 55121
Attn: Mr. Tom Colbert
,ARTHUR 1-1. DICI:LV, .\.1..\.
WAYNE A. JESI:F. C.C.S.
N1:\RY 13. 1-1US1 :\1), .\.l. \.
RE: EAGAN FIRE STATION NO. 4 - CITY CONTRACT 87-39
(•(.,.. 1 0, J,
- Dear Tom:
The Contractor has submitted prices for the following changes:
1. Drop water fill lines to 11'-0" A.F.F. ADD: $ 335.98
2. Relocate Power Washer to Room 115
Anderson Mechanical: $ 160.00
Collyard Electic: 190.00
Buffalo Painting: 20.00
$ 370.00
Del's Construction 7% 25.90
3. Relocate faucet P12 to Room 104
4. Add Tackboard at Dispatch
Bartley Sales:
Del's Construction 7%
$ 50.00
3.50
5. Change bronze plaque with new council
(see attached)
ADD: $ 395.90
ADD: $ 139.10
ADD: $ 53.50
ADD: $ 589.00
49.'i) , 1t.\N1'I. AN/1.M1. SOUL 1I • MINN1..POLIS, MINN LSO FA'\ 55410 • (012) (P0-399.1
CITY OF EAGAN
Mr. Tom Colbert
18 July 1988
Page 2 of 2
6. Omit duct insulation at return ducts at
Rooms 104 and 115.
No Charge *
7. Install vacuum breaker on cold water line. No Charge *
* The mechanical contractor proposes to trade these two items.
8. Additional electrical work to complete
Change Order No. 1 (see attached). ADD: $ 213..80
Te r/1 c f / 7..-= % --
Please review the above prices. Upon hearing from you, we will proceed
with writing Change Order No. 4. Please contact me if you have any
questions. Thank you.
_Regards,
Mary B. Hustad, A.I.A.
MBH/tgl
cc: Ken Southorn
Del's Construction Company, Inc.
Rt. 1, Box 7b
LeSueur, MN 56058
DATE: March 21, 1988
TO: ARTHUR DICKEY ARCHITECTS
ATTENTION WAYNE
4930 FRANCE AVE S
MINNEAPOLIS MN 55410
PROPOSAL FOR JOB: EAGAN FIRE STATION
EAGAN, MN
WE HEREBY SUBMIT SPECIFICATIONS AND ESTIMATES FOR:
Extra cost from Collyard Electric to install one outlet on the
south east wall because masonry was complete before change order
wss signed, also moving one thermostat outlet to avoid the change
order on extra lockers.
Collyard Electric
Del's 7%
Del's to patch block and brick
$140.00
9.80
64.00
$213.80
WE PROPOSE HEREBY TO FURNISH MATERIAL AND LABOR IN ACCORDANCE
WITH THE ABOVE SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE AMOUNT(S) QUOTED.
AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE _
Del Rischmiller, President
NOTE: THIS PROPOSAL MAY BE WITHDRAWN BY US IF NOT ACCEPTED WITHIN
30 DAYS.
ACCEPTANCE OF PROPOSAL - THE ABOVE PRICES, SPECIFICATIONS AND
CONDITIONS ARE HEREBY ACCEPTED. (PLEASE SIGN ONE COPY AND RETURN)
DATE OF ACCEPTANCE SIGNATURE
1
De1 ' s Construction Company, Inc.
Rt. 1, Box 7b
LeSueur, MN 5,5058
DATE: JUNE 29. 1988
TO: ARTHUR DICKEY ARCHITECTS INC
ATTENTION MARY HUSTAD
4930 FRANCE AVE S
MINNEAPOLIS MN 55410
PROPOSAL FOR JOB: EAGAN FIRE STATION
EAGAN, MN
WE HEREBY SUBMIT SPECIFICATIONS AND ESTIMATES FOR:
VACUUM BREAKER ON END OF HOSE BIB:
ANDERSON MECHANICAL $390.00
7% 27.00
BRONZE PLAQUE:
BARTLEY SALES
7%
TOTAL $417.00
$550.00
39.00
TOTAL $589.00
WE PROPOSE HEREBY TO FURNISH MATERIAL AND LABOR IN ACCORDANCE
WITH THE ABOVE SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE AMOUNT(S) QUOTED.
AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE
Del Rischmiller, President
NOTE: THIS PROPOSAL MAY BE WITHDRAWN BY US IF NUT ACCEPTED WITHIN
30 DAYS.
ACCEPTANCE, OF PROPOSAL - THE ABOVE PRICES, SPECIFICATIONS AND
CONDITIONS ARE HEREBY ACCEPTED. (PLEASE SIGN ONE COPY AND RETURN)
DATE OF ACCEPTANCE SIGNATURE
Lyf-n
Agenda Information Memo
August 16, 1988, City Council Meeting
APPROVE BUDGET/GUN CLUB WATERSHED MANAGEMENT ORGANIZATION
H. Approve Budget, Gun Club Watershed Management Organization --
In accordance with the Joint Powers Agreement between the cities
of Eagan, Inver Grove Heights and Mendota Heights which created
the Gun Club Lake Watershed Management Organization (WMO), an
annual budget has been prepared for the 1989 operational year for
thi9 organization. A copy of that budget is enclosed on page
for the Council's information and review. In accordance
with the Joint Powers Agreement, each community has 30 days to
submit any objections to the proposed budget for reconsideration
by the WMO. The estimated $7,700 obligation for the City of
Eagan has been incorporated in the Engineering Division budget
request for 1989. The percentage distribution between the three
cities is based on a proportionate formula of both land area and
assessed valuation within the watershed boundary. This proposed
budget is being recommended for approval by a unanimous vote of
the Gun Club's WMO Board of Managers including the City of
Eagan's three representatives.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the proposed
1989 budget for the Gun Club Lake WMO.
01co 0
cn
� a
O
0
COco r
O 1 co
H rn 11-1
W N .-4
as W
U 03 ca E4
• W W A
m> a
zcOo
arna
• a
0.
EXPENSES
o 00000000
O 00000000
0 • 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
0000000111000
In 1 00ul ul ri r N.0 1
01-01-01- v)-
✓ • (n 1-4
• Q N)- V)
O 000000
0
O 000000 O
O • 0 0 0 0 0 0 O
0 1 0 0 0 0 0, 41 1 1 0
00 .Dullnululu10001
1 .01-0)-(11-01-01- 1 1
(n N r
01- tn. 01-
O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0000000
0 1 00000u10 1 1
4100 ul 410 ul ul 4100
I
r n .-1 6-4 .•-1
0)- 0s 01- 01- 01-
00/000000
O V' O N 0 0 ri O
CD ,4 OrOel.oO
10u1.l(nCrON 1 1 1
1-401 V'0 V'mNN000
01-
.4/3.411.1 II
Q101 N.-• N
01-011.4.4.11-
tn.
1-(ntl1-0 - V)-
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O
0000000 0
0▪ 000000 0
. 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0( 1
.-+o lnN00I410 00
. I
01 O 0,1 CV
v)-,1 v)-sa4n V1- 0)-
1000 0 c
on 0 CO 0 CO
• r0.0 in • 0
I rvr- t 1 .-1 1 1 1 01
O.O.Ou100in. 0000
1 .4a 1 1 1 1 1
N N
r-
01-01- N
0)-
000000 0
000000 O
1 000000'1 O 1 1
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
IOul000Lel 1O 1 1
.tQ
u1NNr•4N
0)-
4)
01
0
41
0
0
ma
()
01 0 -
01 •r1 0
U >0
...40 1.4...1 m
> 0 41,4 10
ii .14 0) CL ,4
O 4.) C4 44
In (d 44 Kt.C1
W w to (O >t 0
01 (0 N 41 O .-I 7
O s 41) 41 _ U 0 N w
•.+ 4) U 1n 01 0 01 0
4/W0 0 41 01•..4 4)
.r C4 10 • ..4 14 0 01 >
• w ,4 .0 C +) 41 •.4 0 14
u C 7 10 -.4 -.4 o 44 •--1 4)
O b N 01.0 0 '•4 0 p 0 0)
0OM1.4a4404000Da
$17,150.00
$28,060.00(11/449,757.79
ESTIMATE
F
0
F
0
F
0
REVENUES
Orin.)
• 0 Tr m 1-• a
4n V --�-
0f1r-1.0
ul ▪ v (n r
r r 1-4 CO
121 .D .O N
• 01-01-
CO r
00000000
0.-1001
• ul 1--1M
0 • • •
0011-('1
0
$17,150.00
00
0
0
0
.-1
$16,050.00
00000000 00
.-O O N N O
1D V'001
0
(n0 V'r, O
c. In •--v
so so
rn(n(ner 01
r O . -1 co r
r o 1▪ -i .D r
01 03 N 1n 111
.00001 r
• . 01-
r4 ul 01
N N0)- V'
0)- 01- 0) -
OP 00 00 00 00
OmOr. 0
• (nN V'
0 • 0
0011-((1 0
01— v •-4
0) •.4
o •-a1-
7 0) >
&4 x 0
14
d 00
> 4.)
1.400)4
4) A •0 4)
O m0>
4) 10 4/ 0
W .,
$36,000.00
•
14
0
4J
4)
0
.•-4
b
ro
.1
44
v
4)
44
4)
4J
b
fa
0
04
N
0
u
0
0
4,
r
aO
1
v
1
1(1
•o
0
0
to
co
10
I
O
r-1
w
0
0
0
14
U 10
R:
01
►4 O
41 H
as
•0 u
W
44 4)
(0 >
ncu
•0
044
0
CD ▪ OP
010
ro •
0
w ►n
Agenda Information Memo
August 16, 1988, City Council Meeting
CONTRACT 88-25/BIDS/AWARD CONTRACT
I. Contract 88-25, Receive Bids/Award Contract (South Dodd Road
- Overlay) --On August 5, 1988, formal bids were received for the
installation of a bituminous overlay on South Dodd Road.
Enclosed on page Ole is a tabulation of the bids received
with an analysis of t e low bid to the estimate contained in the
feasibility report discussed at the public hearing held on August
5, 1988. All bids will be checked for accuracy and completeness
with any deviations or inconsistencies being discussed by the
Assistant City Engineer at the August 16 Council meeting.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To receive the bids for
Contract 88-25 (South Dodd Road - Overlay) and award the contract
to the lowest responsible bidder.
DODD ROAD BITUMINOUS OVERLAY
CITY CONTRACT NO. 88-25
PROJECT NO. 515
EAGAN, MN.
1988
BID TIME: 10:30 A.M., C.D.S.T.
BID DATE: AUGUST 5, 1988
CONTRACTORS TOTAL BASE BID
1. PREFERRED PAVINGS, INC.
2. ALEXANDER CONSTRUCTION CO., INC.
3. ACE BLACKTOP, INC.
$ 54,823.60
55,253.35
56,467.75
4. NORTHWEST ASPHALT, INC. 58,679.55
5. L. A. CONSTRUCTION, INC.
6. MC NAMARA CONTRACTING CO., INC.
7. BITUMINOUS ROADWAYS, INC.
8. BARBER CONSTRUCTION CO., INC.
59,159.75
59,380.00
59,675.65
71,006.00
LOW BID $ 54,823.60
Agenda Information Memo
August 16, 1988, City Council Meeting
PROJ 547A/RECEIVE REPT/APPROVE PLANS/AUTHORIZE BIDS
J. Project 547A, Contract 88-31, Receive Report/Appro
Plans/Authorize Ad For Bids (Well #12) --Enclosed on pages
through oZQ is a report prepared by the consulting engine it ng
firm of Orr-Schelen-Mayeron-&-Associates (OSM) for the
development of Well #12 to be located within Evergreen Park
adjacent to the Highline Trailway. Also, the detailed plans and
specifications for the construction of this well have been
completed and are being presented to the Council for their
information and authorization to advertise for competitive bid
solicitation. The location and timing of this well is in
compliance with the revised Comprehensive Water Supply &
Distribution Plan for the City of Eagan.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To receive the report for
Project 547A (Well #12), approve plans for Contract 88-31 and
authorize the advertisement for a bid opening to be held at 10:30
a.m. on Wednesday, September 14, 1988.
REPORT ON
DEEP WELL NO. 12
PROJECT NO. 547
EAGAN, MINNESOTA
August 8, 1988
DESCRIPTION
This project provides for a municipal water well for the City of Eagan in_ the
south well field area. Several sites have been evaluated with the City staff
and the Department of Health and they are as follows:
1. FIRE STATION #3
This site does not have adequate room to place a well and meet the
Department of Health requirements.
2. THOMAS LAKE PARK
An ideal site was arrived at that was satisfactory to the Department of
Health and the City's Park Director. This site cannot be used for a
well site until permission is granted from the agency that provided the
City with a grant for park construction. This permission will take
from 8 to 10 months which is outside of the timeframe needed by the
City.
3. EVERGREEN PARK
This site has been designated as a well site on the City's master plan
for wells. The site was viewed by the Minnesota Department of Health
and the City's Park Director and was acceptable to everyone. This is
the site that is being proposed for Well No. 12.
The project consist of a Jordan Well, approximately 500 feet deep, a
pumphouse with a natural gas engine and chemical feed equipment and
approximately 1200 lineal feet of watermain along the NSP easement from
Pilot Knob Road to Evergreen Park.
COST ESTIMATES
The estimated cost of this project is as follows:
Jordan Well $145,000.00
Pumphouse with Gas Engine and Chemical Feed 200,000.00
Watermain to Site 45,000.00
Estimated Construction Cost $390,000.00
+5% Contingency 19,500.00
$409,500.00
+20% Engineering, Legal & Administration 81,900.00
Total Estimated Project Cost $491,400.00
4
PROJECT SCHEDULE
The proposed schedule to meet the City's request to have the well on-line by
May 31, 1989 is as follows:
Present Report August 16, 1988
Approve Plans and Specifications on Well August 16, 1988
Receive Bids on Well Sept. 14, 1988
Award Bids on Well Sept. 20, 1988
Approve Plans & Specifications on Pumphouse Waterline Nov. 15, 1988
Receive Bids on Pumphouse and Waterline Dec. 14, 1988
Award Bids on Pumphouse and Waterline Dec. 20, 1988
Construction Completion of Well March 15, 1989
Construction Completion of Pumphouse and Watermain May 31, 1989
100 0 100 200
3
SCALE IN FEET
2
PROPOSED
R AW WATER
Lt'NE
THOMAS
LAKE PARK
Drawn By:
W. K. N.
Dote:
8/8/88
chelen
rr
Yayeron i
Associates. Inc.
Engineers • Surveyors • Planners
1143S1 N.aa.pta
• Nfee..pelts. MN 66413 • efl-331-.eso
Drawing Title
DEEP WELL NO.12
PROJECT NO. 547
EAGAN, MINNESOTA
Comm. No.
4213
Sheet no.
0
Agenda Information Memo
August 16, 1988, City Council Meeting
CONTRACT 88-30/APPROVE PLANS/AUTHORIZE BIDS
K. Contract 88-30, Approve Plans/Authorize Ad For Bids (South
Oaks - Streets & Utilities) --In accordance with the directives
issued at the public hearing on June 21, 1988, approving the
above -referenced project, the consulting engineering firm of
Bonestroo, Rosene, Anderlik & Associates have completed the
detailed plans and specifications for the installation of these
improvements. The approval of the plans at this time will allow
the installation of the utilities to occur this fall with
street construction being completed in the spring of 1989, taking
maximum advantage of the benefit of the "freeze -thaw" cycle
during the winter months to minimize potential future
settlements.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the plans for
Contract 88-30 (South Oaks - Streets & Utilities) and authorize
the advertisement for a bid opening to be held on September 15,
1988, at 11:30 a.m.
01
Agenda Information Memo
August 16, 1988, City Council Meeting
PROJ 552/PETITION/FEASIBILITY REPT/ECIP #3
L. Project 552, Receive Petition/Order Feasibility Report (ECIP
#3 - Water Main and Storm Sewer) --Staff has received a petition
from the developer of the proposed Eagandale Center Industrial
Park #3 (Lone Oak Business Center #2). The proposed improvement
is located adjacent to and immediately westerly of the existing
Lone Oak Center Phase 1 building which is located at the
southwest quadrant of Lone Oak Road and Neil Armstrong Boulevard.
The developer is requesting the preparation of a feasibility
report to identify the cost for the installation of water service
and storm sewer facilities necessary for this development. With
the guarantee of all costs for the preparation of the feasibility
report, it would be appropriate for Council to authorize the
preparation of this requested feasibility report.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To receive the petition
for Project 552 (ECIP #3 - Water Main and Storm Sewer) and
authorize the preparation of a feasibility report.
FINAL PLAT/BEAU DE RUE DRIVE
M. Approve Final Plat, Beau De Rue Drive Plat --Staff has
received an application for final plat approval for the Beau De
Rue Drive plat located immediately adjacent to Beau De Rue Drive
and easterly of Nic 1s Road as shown by the final plat layout
enclosed on page 0.0 All final plat application materials
have been submitted, reviewed by staff and found to be in order
for favorable Council action.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the final plat
for the Beau De Rue Drive plat and authorize the Mayor and City
Clerk to execute all related documents.
it
.1
0
ui
);Q
N•o
i!>
(n1N
014
J+J
RUE DRIVE PLAT
11 ,...1.;•
i.,
1111-1
D,:f
11 1!1-,
1 ;:»;
1 i. • 7; i'
J.
1 i 1:.11
t ; !4171
_ _ !Fivi
a 1!.),'
1,
• !=y3
I s1l,j
1 i I11'
iilli
• , 1...
in
' 1 I;•,, i 111
1
1' J., if].
: lain •
,1 lj'1- 'iii
!ll 1
f11;1111 '41'
1 1 �ljli t 1 J+
i • ! 1�•;i. 4 1
.i1
t t
1,
al
'1
ii I1
t
1
1
1
N �
1
r
f
!
1
11•
11
11
ti
1-
t •
1'
: 1
Lit
1
-1-
1 1
11
11
..
1!
!'
,/ 6
dog �\ Y ,� .• 1 i\
1;
alt N iA,\ •�\ �`�/�'• v �.w1 •1
�- \
la
4 S t . 2 ... in •
i .if'
r �•f y�
'c
1 tib. �, .,1 �
• 'r -1e*:1/4 o�' 1 1 13:: 4!vs
t
i) ♦\.\J�1 )iir ,
l i li .� \ la� A.1 1 ±,
1, J �: .� I I
•t � � 1
1'411`; o 111' i.i rl
11 S
is ; ` �� 4441 !' I i'
' a • „ al t: -4 '
•• ; 11 fi
\-I•e
C
...........4.z.._
1
I
!;
1!
i11F ave. •- .::•.'✓ ; 7.:7:N
1'
I
1!
a.
1'
J'
1-1
1 t
1:
1
11
1
i
Agenda Information Memo
August 16, 1988, City Council Meeting
FINAL PLAT/HOSFORD ADDN
N. Approve Final Plat, Hosford 1st Addition --Staff received an
application for final plat approval for the Hosford 1st Addition
located south of Deerwood Drive opposite its intersection with
Denmark Avenue as shown by the plat layout enclosed on page ..:2;!.r
All final plat application materials have been submitted,
reviewed by staff and found to be in order for favorable Council
action.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the final plat
for the Hosford 1st Addition and authorize the Mayor and City
Clerk to execute all related documents.
a Lf
0
CC
0
Lj0
rth foot ~��uan
04
^~~~~~~~'~~~~'~'^
—,.—J
~ACDITLOM have~—.~~~..
LOX, `~ err ~.~... 1.141,~^
Niz
Z
xo
(cfr)
0)-
w
. >
cD
Mtn
LA<
0-J
a.
LOCATION
cc
it 1011 •ge •re DI, 6,1" 40 awl as•a/
1„12.10:01 00411
00 4l
-I
0
L
oos..
CO 0803SOH
DE ERWOOD
4,114 404 Ot 00 41 81
••
_
•
---
r
.
V. mt...."
3.02 .10.,01
rn
—
81
8
00 1.111
8
Agenda Information Memo
August 16, 1988, City Council Meeting
PROJ 543/REPT/PUBLIC HEARING/PRETTYMAN HEIGHTS
O. Project 543, Receive Report/Order Public Hearing (Prettyman
Heights - Streets) --In response to a petition submitted by the
developer of the proposed Prettyman Heights Addition, Council
authorized the preparation of a feasibility report which has now
been completed and is being presented to the Council in
consideration of scheduling a public hearing to formally discuss
the proposed improvements.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To receive the feasibility
report for Project 543 (Prettyman Heights - Streets) and schedule
a public hearing to be held on September 19, 1988.
FINAL PLAT/TOWN CENTRE 70 10TH ADDN
P. Approve Final Plat, Town Centre 70 10th Addition --Staff has
received an application for final plat approval for the Town
Center 70 10th Addition (Mermaid Car Wash) located north of
Duckwood Drive between I -35E and Town Centre Drive as shown by
the final plat layout enclosed on page 0)7 . All final plat
application materials have been submitted, reviewed by staff and
found to be in order for favorable Council action.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the final plat
for Town Centre 70 10th Addition and authorize the Mayor and City
Clerk to execute all related documents.
sat
0
1--
<z
:c
f—
1-
1--
0
F.-
5
cr
1— 5 8
iIJ :
U a •g
:7 _ ;I
0
1-
2 ,I
8
2
S1.
1.
;8
8
Ili!
:l1
11
1:
5 I
.f 6;i
2. "5518
18153
as
i5 K8
EE
r
6
2
a
11 —
1.1•1111• norni, C.i•
Czi
--r!!IE
€.
•
1
1
5
f•II
1:
i I`3fl
2356:,
(1) 0
•- ii
1
A..
Agenda Information Memo
August 16, 1988, City Council Meeting
VACATION/PUBLIC HEARING/MENDOTA WAGON RD
Q. Receive Petition/Order Public Hearing (Mendota Wagon Road) --
Riverview Development Company is the fee owner of a parcel of
property located in the northeast corner of the intersection of
Lone Oak Road and the Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul and Pacific
Railroad. The title for this parcel makes reference to a Mendota
Wagon Road as called for in Document No. 160366 and as shown on
the plat for Robert O'Neill Homestead. At the suggestion of the
County Recorder, Riverview Development Company is requesting that
this roadway easement over their subject parcel be vacated in
order to clear the title. The staff has received a petition and
application materials requesting a public hearing for the
vacation of this easement. Staff has reviewed this easement and
feels it would be appropriate for the Council to receive this
petition and schedule a formal public hearing.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To receive the petition to
vacate Mendota Wagon Road over the parcel described on the
enclosed legal description and order the public hearing to be
held on September 19, 1988.
VACATION/PUBLIC HEARING/PART OF CEDARVALE DRIVE
R. Receive Petition/Order Public Hearing (Portion of Cedarvale
Drive) --The City of Eagan is proposing to vacate 375' of
Cedarvale Drive between Rahn Road and Cedarvale Shopping Center.
This street serves only Cedarvale Shopping Center and is not
constructed to City standards. Because this street is difficult
and expensive to maintain, the Public Works Department is
requesting the Council to consider this vacation and schedule a
formal public hearing.
If this street is not vacated, it should be brought up to City
standards and assessed to the appropriate property owners.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: For the City Council to
approve the proposed vacation of part of Cedarvale Drive and
to order a public hearing to be held on September 19, 1988.
a8
Agenda Information Memo
August 16, 1988, City Council Meeting
DELINQUENT WEED CUTTING BILIS
RECEIVE ASSESSMENT ROLL/ORDER PUBLIC HEARING
S. Receive Assessment Roll/Order Public Hearing (Delinquent
Utility Bills) --The following weed cutting bills have been
identified as delinquent by the Finance Department:
Parcel # Amount
10-17406-100-01 $136.00
10-16602-050-01 96.00
10-64600-110-01 80.00
These assessments will be spread for one year only at 9%
interest.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To receive the final
assessment roll for delinquent weed cutting bills and schedule
the public hearing for September 19, 1988.
DELINQUENT UTILITY BILLS
RECEIVE ASSESSMENT ROLL/ORDER PUBLIC HEARING
T. Receive Assessment Roll/Order Public Hearing (Delinquent
Utility Bills) --A list of delinquent accounts which cannot be
shut off for collection has been put together by Utility Billing.
Enclosed on page$ 301131 is the list. These assessments will be
spread for one year only at 9% interest.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To receive the final
assessment roll for Delinquent Utility Bills and schedulethe
public hearing for September 19, 1988.
,R
PLAT/PARCEL AMOUNT PLAT/PARCEL AMOUNT
10 84600 170 01 33.00
10 84602 180 03 52.00
10 53801 070 01 94.93
10 39800 150 02 240.31
10 16602 022 02 71.89
10 17400 200 00 47.63
10 17400 170 00 104.87
10 17402 130 04
43.18
43.18 86.36
10 17402 110 04
88.37
95.15 183.52
10 17402 102 04 271.88
10 17402 101 04 140.32
10 17402 092 04 140.32
10 17402 091 04 140.32
10 17402 040 04
185.44
156.41 341.85
10 17402 031 04 199.94
10 17402 032 04 142.01
10 17402 021 04 64.72
10 17402 012 05 172.94
10 17402 011 05 154.72
10 17402 031 05 43.18
10 17402 032 05 61.75
10 17402 042 05 142.86
10 17402 041 05 172.28
10 17402 051 05 147.26
10 17402 052 05 140.32
10 17403 010 01
140.32
140.32
10 17403 040 01
187.89
280.64
162.03 349.92
10 17403 051 01
10 17403 052 01
10 17403 071 01
10 17404 010 01
10 17404 042 01
10 17404 041 01
10 17404 052 01
10 17404 051 01
10 17404 061 01
10 17404 062 01
10 17404 081 01
10 17404 082 01
10 63981 020 02
10 63981 020 03
10 63983 030 09
10 39802 020 04
10 73002 020 07
10 76503 030 07
10 14993 280 01
10 14993 440 01
10 44651 130 01
10 44651 120 01
10 16703 190 08
10 16703 370 04
10 24880 070 01
10 84354 110 03
10 84602 400 03
10 17104 010 02
10 17151 110 03
10 45070 160 03
10 16601 032 01
10 16601 031 01
10 16602 050 01
10 17400 190 00
10 17400 173 00
10 17400 171 00
30
192.97
180.84
89.22
49.10
100.95
100.60
85.35
138.09
149.19
136.49
177.96
136.49
228.80
46.79
65.27
252.52
59.80
104.83
188.29
42.57
67.09
40.26
73.96
22.29
14.81
38.52
25.43
46.89
114.48
10.28
70.22
65.32
395.72
41.95
83.46
80.84
PLAT/PARCEL AMOUNT PLAT/PARCEL AMOUNT
10 17400 170 00 37.34
10 17402 062 03 22.50
10 17402 030 02 97.19
10 63981 020 10 110.41
10 63982 030 10 173.13
10 63983 030 12 16.56
10 63984 030 15 174.96
10 63984 020 08 84.42
10 56750 040. 02 40.81
10 22750 380 03 30.21
10 25600 050 03 79.94
10 01900 020 10 64.01
v 77100 040 16 85.62
10 77100 010 16 30.00
10 73002 111 01 55.80
10 73001 040 21 200.05
10 73003 040 07 56.17
10 84460 180 03 118.05
10 14991 120 01 248.94
1C 20960 210 04 101.24
1C 14993 420 01 585.30
TOTAL 10,152.03
3�
Agenda Information Memo
August 16, 1988, City Council Meeting
PUBLIC HEARINGS
FINAL ASSESSMENT HEARING/LEXINGTON HILL
A. Project 478, Final Assessment Hearing (Lexington Hill -
Sanitary Sewer) --Due to the inability to meet the required
published and mailed notification requirements for final
assessment hearings for this project, it is necessary to continue
this public hearing to September 6, 1988.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To continue the final
assessment public hearing for Project 478 (Lexington Hill -
Sanitary Sewer) to September 6, 1988.
FINAL ASSESSMENT HEARING/LEXINGTON-NORTHVIEW PK
B. Project 479, Final Assessment Hearing (Lexington/Northview
Park - Trunk Storm Sewer) --Due to the inability to meet the
required published and •mailed notification requirements for final
assessment hearings for this project, it is necessary to continue
this public hearing to September 6, 1988.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To continue the final
assessment public hearing for Project 479 (Lexington/Northview
Park - Trunk Storm Sewer) to September 6, 1988.
FINAL ASSESSMENT HEARING/YANKEE DOODLE RD
C. Project 461, Final Assessment Hearing (Yankee Doodle Road -
I -35E to Lexington Avenue - Streets) --Due to the inability to
meet the required published and mailed notification requirements
for final assessment hearings for this project, it is necessary
to continue this public hearing to September 6, 1988.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To continue the final
assessment public hearing for Project 478 (Yankee Doodle Road -
I -35E to Lexington Avenue - Streets) to September 6, 1988.
3�
Agenda Information Memo
August 16, 1988, City Council Meeting
PROJ 544/MALLARD PK 3RD ADDN/STREET LIGHTS
D. Project 544, Mallard Park 3rd Addition (Street Lights) --On
July 19, 1988, the feasibility report for the above -referenced
project was received and a public heari g was scheduled for
August 16, 1988. Enclosed on pages through 3' is a
copy of the feasibility report for the Council's information and
review during the public hearing presentation by staff. All
notices have been published in the legal newspaper and sent to
all affected property owners informing them of this public
hearing.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To close the public
hearing and approve/deny Project 544 (Mallard Park 3rd Addition -
Streetlights) and if approved, authorize the preparation of
detailed plans and specifications.
33
CITY OF EAGAN, MINNESOTA
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
FEASIBILITY REPORT
FOR
STREET LIGHTING - PROJECT NO. 544
DRAKE DRIVE, MALLARD PARK 3RD ADDITION
JULY 19, 1988
I hereby certify that this report was prepared by me or under my direct
supervision and that I am a duly registered Professional Engineer under the
laws of the State of Minnesota.
/. i
Thomas A. Colbert, P.E.
Registration Number 12049
3 `�
7/2 / '
PRELIMINARY REPORT ON STREET LIGHTING
FOR DRAKE DRIVE
PROJECT NO. 544
EAGAN, MINNESOTA
JULY 19, 1988
SCOPE: This project covers the installation of street lights serving the
residents on Drake Drive, Mallard Park 3rd Addition in the NE 1/4 of Section
29, Eagan.
FEASIBILITY AND RECOMMENDATIONS: This project is feasible and is in
accordance with the City's policy on the installation of street lights in
residential areas. It can best be accomplished as outlined herein and not as
a part of any other project.
DISCUSSION: Residents on Drake Drive have petitioned for the installation of
street lights. This addition contains 16 lots which would benefit from street
lighting.
This area was developed before the City of Eagan adopted a comprehensive
street lighting policy. Since the enactment of this policy, all new additions
have been required to install street lights. The above-mentioned policy also
has a provision enabling older additions to petition for street lights. Under
this provision, the cost of street light installation is assessed against the
benefited lots and the energy charge is paid quarterly by the residents along
with their water and sewer bill.
The energy needs for Drake Drive are serviced by Dakota Electric Association,
and they offer the type of street lighting poles, lighting fixtures and the
necessary maintenance service required by the City for residential street
lighting in accordance with the City of Eagan's street lighting policy.
It is proposed to have four street lights installed.
ORNAMENTAL STREET LIGHTS: These four street lights would be the standard
ornamental design with 100 watt high pressure sodium luminaire mounted on
standard poles proposed to be installed by Dakota Electric Association.
COST ESTIMATE: The following cost estimate includes the cost of construction,
administration, legal and other related project costs.
4 ea 100 w ornamental high pressure sodium @ $500.00 $2,000.00
5% contingency factor 100.00
15'6 administration cost 300.00
TOTAL $2,400.00
Cost Revenue
Installation $2,400.00
Assessments $2,400.00
ASSESSMENTS: Assessments are proposed to be levied on a per lot basis as is
the current City policy. All costs of the project will be assessed.
Estimated assessments are as follows:
Estimated Assessment $150/lot
Energy charge to be billed with water & sewer $2.75/lot/quarter
Assessments would be spread over three years at 9.0% interest.
PROJECT SCHEDULE: The following is the proposed schedule to be followed for
this project assuming favorable action by the Council.
PROJECT SCHEDULE
Present Feasibility Report
Public Hearing
Approve Plans & Specs
Construction Completed
Final Assessment Hearing
First Payment due with taxes
July 19, 1988
August 16, 1988
September, 1988
November 1, 1988
March, 1989
May, 1990
PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL
PROJECT 544
DRAKE DRIVE, MALLARD PARK 3RD ADDITION
Parcel Description Assessment
Mallard Park 3rd Addition
Lot 1, Block 2 $150/lot
Lot 2, Block 2 $150/lot
Lot 3, Block 2 $150/lot
Lot 4, Block 2 $150/lot
Lot 5, Block 2 $150/lot
Lot 6, Block 2 $150/lot
Lot 7, Block 2 $150/lot
Lot 8, Block 2 $150/lot
Lot 9, Block 2 $150/lot
Lot 10, Block 2 $150/lot
Lot 111, Block 2 $150/lot
Lot 12, Block 2 $150/lot
Lot 13, Block 2 $150/lot
Lot 14, Block 2 $150/lot
Lot 15, Block 2 $150/lot
Lot 16, Block 2 $150/lot
PROPOSED STREET LIGHTS
PROPOSED ASSESSMENT AREA
VIOWO i9 V1OSINN1W 171 OM vp
viosNNIw 'NoloWwavd
NO11Y1DOSSV J12110313 vio wa
0
0
ji•
if
L
3Q
0
0
Agenda Information Memo
August 16, 1988, City Council Meeting
VACATION/CEDARVALE BOULEVARD
E. Partial Vacation of Public Right -of -Way, Cedarvale
Boulevard --This public hearing was originally scheduled for
August 2 but was subsequently continued to August 16 so that it
could be discussed in conjunction with the variance for parking
lot improvements for the Cedarvale Shopping Complex item under
Old Business. The applicant no longer desires to pursue the
variance to City standards for parking setbacks, curb and gutter
and landscaping requirements. Enclosed on page 4O is a
sketch and legal description of the excess right-of-way proposed
to be vacated as a result of this public hearing. The excess
right-of-way is a result of the jurisdictional turnback of Old
Trunk Highway 13 which was subsequently relocated with the
construction of the Cedar Avenue Freeway interchange. By
vacating this excess right-of-way, the owners of the Cedarvale
Shopping Center complex can expand and improve their parking lot
facilities.
All notices were published in the legal newspaper and sent to all
potentially affected utility companies informing them of the
proposed vacation of this excess right-of-way. There are
existing private utilities (telephone, sewer, etc.) located
within the area proposed to be vacated. Therefore, the
resolution vacating this right-of-way, if approved, should
specifically reference the vacation of "street" rights while
still retaining the necessary underlying utility easements.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To close the public
hearing and approve/deny the partial vacation of public right-of-
way for Cedarvale Boulevard as described.
�J �
SIGMA
SURVEYING SERVICES INC.
3730 Piot Knob RoodMinnesotaEodon.Minnesota 65122
(612)452-7077
1.4
—STREET VACATION EXHIBIT —
p/c)CEDARVALE BLVD.
and
Old FRONTAGE ROAD to S.T.H. 13
Eagan, Minnesota
E'l Line of Ceda-ala Sl,ar�;..9 Cenf r prorerty
G:
-
1J
1
< •
h' O o
e 2�
1'
RVALE DRIVE
a
NW N
Zt 2
\ey Ot
/40 SHEET 2 of 2 SHEETS
W
BEAU - D - RUE
Agenda Information Memo
August 16, 1988, City Council Meeting
OLD BUSINESS
VARIANCES FOR PARKING LOT IMPROVEMENTS
CEDARVALE BOULEVARD
A. Variances for Parking Lot Improvements (Cedarvale Boulevard)
--As previously discussed with the Public Hearing concerning the
partial vacation of Cedarvale Boulevard right-of-way, the
applicant no longer wishes to pursue variances to parking
setbacks, curb and gutter and landscaping requirements.
Therefore, this item has been withdrawn.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: Because this application
is being withdrawn, no action is required.
L[l
Agenda Information Memo
August 16, 1988, City Council Meeting
COMPREHENSIVE GUIDE PLAN AMENDMENT/RAHNCLIFF 2ND ADDITION
REZONING & PRELIMINARY PLAT
B. Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment, for Rahncliff 2nd
Addition/Austin Companies, Rezoning of 16.8 LB (Limited Business)
and RB (Roadside Business) Acres to a Commercial Planned
Development District and Preliminary Plat --A public hearing was
held by the Advisory Planning Commission at its regular meeting
on June 28, 1988, to consider a comprehensive guide plan
amendment and rezoning of 5.6 LB (Limited Business) and 11.2 RD
(Roadside Business) acres to a commercial planned development
district and a preliminary plat entitled Rahncliff 2nd Addition.
The APC recommended approval of the applications.
At its regular meeting of July 19, 1988, the City Council
considered this matter and continued to the August 16 meeting.
The purpose of the continuance was to allow Council review of the
recently completed retail/commerical study. Such review is
scheduled for Monday, August 16, 1988. The Planning and
Enginee ing Departments report on this matter is enclosed on
pages L3 through (JJ . For a copy of the Advisory Planning
Commission action on this item, please refer to pages (o
through —7( .
Also attached on pages ?. through -75 is a copy of the July
19, 1988 City Council minutes.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny: 1) The
comprehensive guide plan amendment for Rahncliff 2nd Addition,
2) a rezoning of 5.6 limited business acres and 11.2 roadside
busines acres to a commercial planned development district of
16.08 acres, and 3) a preliminary plat entitled Rahncliff 2nd
Addition.
SUBJECT: COMPREHENSIVE GUIDE PLAN AMENDMENT
REZONING
PRELIMINARY PLAT
(RAHNCLIFF 2ND ADDITION)
APPLICANT: AUSTIN COMPANIES
LOCATION: NW 1/4 OF SECTION 32
EXISTING ZONING: LB (LIMITED BUSINESS)
RB (ROADSIDE BUSINESS)
DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: JUNE 28, 1988
DATE OF REPORT: JUNE 21, 1988
REPORTED BY: PLANNING AND ENGINEERING DEPARTMENTS
APPLICATION SUMMARY
Separate applications have been submitted requesting a Rezoning
of 5.6 LB (limited business) and 11.2 RB (roadside business)
acres to a commercial Planned Development district, and a
Preliminary Plat for the Rahncliff 2nd Addition. This site is
located between Rahn Road and Highway 35E along the south side of
Cliff Road. The uses proposed for this development are
consistent with the existing zoning districts. The Planned
Development zoning allows the City the opportunity to review the
overall development at this time as opposed to individual
requests on each lot. Also, architectural landscaping and
signage compatibility will be addressed with this plat. Even
though the uses are consistent with the existing commercial
zoning, a Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment will be necessary.
SITE PLAN
This site is very flat and highly visible from Highway 35E.
There is no significant vegetation to be concerned with. Access
will be primarily from the previously constructed Rahn Cliff
Court with two secondary drives connecting to Rahn Road. Shared
parking areas provide 832 stalls, well above the amount required
by Code (730 - 815). The following is a breakdown of each area
and proposed use.
Lot 1, block 1
Lot 2, block 1
Outlot A
acres)
acres)
acres)
7,000 SF
11,200 SF
20,000 SF
Lot 1, block 2 (3.8 acres) 50,000 SF
Outlot B
Outlot C
(1.8 acres)
( .8 acres)
12,000 SF
5,000 SF
�4 3
Bank
Retail
Retail (possibly 2 bldgs)
Multi-level (1-3 stories)
office with 60 under-
ground parking spaces
Retail
Restaurant
Loc i, t . J acres) .., Juu 5r r ast-Loon t burger i\ing )
Lot 2, block 3 (1.4 acres) 10,000 SF Retail
Lot 3, block 3 (3.3 acres) 18,400 SF Retail
Detailed site plans have been submitted for the office building;
lot 2, block 1; and lot 3, block 3 for City approval at this
time. All lots and outlots will require site plan review and
approval by the Advisory Planning Commission and the City Council
before any construction occurs. All building and parking
setbacks meet Code requirements except for the 10' drive -lane
setback (20' is required) along Cliff Road, the 17' parking
setback (20' is required) along Highway 35E, and the 30' building
setback (50' is required) along the highway for the office
building. No separate action is necessary for these deviations
if the site plans are approved due to the Planned Development
zoning. The extensive landscaping proposed along those areas
screens the parking area nicely and there is no parking proposed
between the office building and the highway. The overall
landscape plan for the sixteen acres is very well done. The
plant material selection, proposed spacing, and quantities will
visually tie the development together. Additional evergreens
will be added along the highway to provide year-round color.
Almost all of the sizes are above City requirements.
The buildings will be constructed on all sides with light and
dark brick, accented with rock -faced block or stucco and metal
canopies. All trash areas will be contained within the buildings
except for the fast-food restaurant which will have it next to
the building and made of the same materials.
An overall sign plan was submitted requesting two 30' -tall
development signs located at the entry points along Cliff and
Rahn Roads and six 7' -tall monument signs located throughout the
site. They are architecturally compatible with each other as
well as with the buildings; however, they should be reduced to
the 27'- maximum height allowed by Code. Individual tenant pylon
signs have been proposed in three locations.
GRADING/DRAINAGE/EROSION CONTROL: The proposed site has been
previously rough graded and minimal site grading is required for
site development.
The Development is proposing to intercept all internal site
generated storm water runoff and convey it to the existing City
storm sewer system. A detailed analysis of the proposed internal
parking lot storm sewer system was not performed at this time,
but the following general requirements should be noted:
1. No direct connection to the existing 21" storm sewer
along the south side of Cliff Road will be allowed.
2. No direct connection to the existing 18" storm sewer
line along the westerly side of I -35E will be allowed.
3. The Development is limited to approximately 10 CFS of
storm water runoff which it can discharge directly into
the existing 30" storm sewer which crosses Cliff Road
at the northeasterly corner of the Development and
flows into Pond AP -42. All remaining site generated
runoff must be routed through Pond AP -44 prior to
discharge into the existing City storm sewer system.
4. No encroachment below the 918 high water elevation for
Pond AP -44 will be allowed.
5. The Development will be responsible for rerouting the
existing storm sewer system in Rahn Cliff Court which
discharges into the existing 18" storm sewer along the
westerly side of I -35E. The runoff from this area is
required to drain into Pond AP -44.
A major water resource for this site is the impact of development
on the water quality of Cliff Lake (Pond AP -11). Cliff Lake has
been classified as a Type 2 recreational water body in the Eagan
Preliminary Water Quality Plan. The potential impacts on Cliff
Lake were estimated using models developed by William Walker, Jr.
The proposed land use and increase in impervious area resulting
from site development will increase the phosphorus loading to
Cliff Lake by approximately 30 pounds. The Development will be
required to reduce phosphorus runoff into Cliff Lake to
predevelopment levels. There are two options available to reduce
the impacts of site development on the water quality of Cliff
Lake.
1. Constructing two 0.4 acre ponds, each with 1.0 acre
feet of storage onsite will reduce phosphorus runoff into
Cliff Lake to approximately predevelopment levels.
2. Increasing the wet pond volume on Pond AP -42 to
approximately 4.3 acre feet and increasing the wet pond
volume of Pond AP -44.2 by approximately 1 acre foot will
also reduce phosphorus loading to Cliff Lake to
predevelopment levels.
A preliminary erosion and sediment control plan was submitted for
staff review at this time. The following erosion and sediment
control practices are needed to be implemented during the
building phase and shown on the appropriate grading, drainage and
erosion control plan prior to any site development:
1. Storm sewer inlet filters in depressional areas and
other appropriate locations.
2. Silt fence along portions of Rahn Cliff Court.
3. Gravel access pads to minimize tracking onto Rahn Cliff
Court.
4. Stabilization of the slope along Pond AP -44.2.
UTILITIES: Sanitary sewer service of sufficient capacity and
depth to serve the Development is readily available from the
existing sanitary sewer line in Rahn Cliff Court.
Watermain service of sufficient capacity and pressure to serve
this Development is readily available from the existing
watermains in Rahn Road, Rahn Cliff Court, and from the existing
16" trunk watermain which crosses a site in the area of proposed
Outlot B.
STREETS/ACCESS/CIRCULATION: Improved public street access to
serve the Development is readily available from Rahn Road and
Rahn Cliff Court. A limited access (right in - right out) onto
Cliff Road was constructed with the Rahn Cliff 1st Addition. The
existing limited access presents traffic enforcement problems.
This entrance will either.be required to be closed and all
internal traffic circulation directed to Rahn Cliff Court, or the
median in Cliff Road extended westerly to close the "attempted
full access" maneuver which is presently causing traffic
circulation enforcement problems along Cliff Road.
All entrances into parking areas from public street right-of-way
and all major internal parking lot driving aisles are required to
be 30' wide. All internal parking lot major driving aisles are
required to be 30' wide also. The proposed internal parking lot
circulation maneuvers are subject a detail review by the City's
traffic engineering consultant.
Ktkb
The City's traffic engineering consultant has reviewed the site
plan for the proposed Rahn Cliff 2nd Addition. Based on the uses
and the square footages of the buildings shown on the proposed
site plan, approximately 7,750 trips on an average week day will
result. Of this projected 7,750 trips per day, approximately 555
will be outbound and approximately 320 will be inbound in the
evening rush hour. As a part of the analysis for the City of
Eagan's Comprehensive Transportation Plan, it was assumed that
there would be some retail development in the area and that it
would probably generate approximately 2,400 vehicle trips per
day. The Development as proposed is approximately 3 times the
traffic generator as previously assumed.
The additional daily traffic will put an additional burden on the
intersection of Cliff and Rahn Road. Virtually all the traffic
from the Development will utilitze the Cliff and Rahn Road
intersection. Only about 200 vehicles per day are anticipated to
use the existing right in -right out off of Cliff Road. The
intersection of Rahn Road and Cliff Road is scheduled for
reconstruction in 1988 as a result of the proposed Cliff Lake
Centre Development. The additional traffic from the south will
create capacity problems beyond what was originally anticipated
in the proposed Cliff and Rahn Road intersection construction.
EASEMENTS/RIGHTS-OF-WAY/PERMITS: The Dakota County Plat
Commission met on May 23, 1988, to consider the preliminary plat
of Rahn Cliff 2nd Addition. The plat is adjacent to County State
Aid Highway #32 (Cliff Road) and is, therefore, subject to Dakota
County Contiguous Plat Ordinance. After a review of the plat it
was a concensus of opinion of the Plat Commission that said plat
does agree with the provisions of the ordinance. Restricted
access will be required to be rededicated on the final plat as
per the Rahn Cliff 1st Addition.
No additional right-of-way requirements are identified for Cliff
Road, Rahn Road or Rahn Cliff Court.
The Development is responsible for dedicating all appropriate
cross easements for traffic circulation, .utility easements :for
watermain, sanitary sewer and storm sewer as necessitated by
depth, and the appropriate drainage and utility easement as
required to accomodate the necessary storage volume for Pond AP -
44.
All regulatory agency permits shall be acquired within the
appropriate time frame as required by the affected agency.
ASSESSMENTS A search of City records show that there are no
pending assessments of record and the following assessments are
proposed as a condition of final plat approval in accordance with
City Special Assessment Policy No. 82-1:
,ork
PROJ # DESCRIPTION RATE QUANTITY AMOUNT
370 Lateral Benefit
Storm Sewer $30.88 1,124 ff $34,709
254 Lateral Benefit
Sanitary Sewer 15.85 559 ff 8,860
370 Water Service 1,012
316 Lateral Benefit
Storm Sewer 61.75 844 if 52,117
316 Lateral Benefit
Trunk Sanitary
Sewer 6.08 528 f 3,210
Future Cliff Road 111.70 530 ff 59,201
Future Cliff Road
Trailway 13.00 530 ff 6,890
TOTAL PROPOSED ASSESSMENT $165,999
All final assessment obligations will be calculated based on the
quantities and dimensions on the final plat and in accordance
with the rates in effect at the time of the final plat approval.
1. These standard conditions of plat approval as adopted by
Council action on September 15, 1987 shall be complied with:
Al, 81, B2, B3, B4, Cl, C2, C4, C5, D1, El, F1, and G1.
2. A Planned Development Agreement shall be entered into for a
period of five years.
3. Lot 2, block 1; lot 1, block 2; and lot 3, block 3 shall be
approved at this time. All other lots and outlots will be
reviewed by the Advisory Planning Commission and City
Council.
4. All signage shall be subject to the one-time sign fee of
$2.50 per square foot. The overall sign plan as shown on the
site plan shall be approved. A 27' -maximum height shall be
adhered to.
5.
6.
7.
8.
All trash shall be contained within the buildings except for
the fast-food facility on lot 1, block 3.
Rooftop mechanical equipment shall not be visible from the
adjacent roads or Highway 35E.
The building and parking setbacks shall be allowed as
exhibited on the site plan dated May 16, 1988.
The Development is required to revise the proposed watermain
design. The proposed design interconnects 2 different
pressure zones.
9. The Development isrequired to limit phosphorus
Cliff Lake to pre -development levels.
10. No direct connection to the existing 21" storm
the south side of Cliff Road will be allowed.
loadings to
sewer along
11. No direct connection to the existing 18" storm sewer line
along the westerly side of I -35E will be allowed.
12. The Development is limited to approximately 10 CFS of storm
water runoff which it can discharge directly into the
existing 30" storm sewer which crosses Cliff Road at the
northeasterly corner of the Development and flows into Pond
AP -42. All remaining site generated runoff must be routed
through Pond AP -44 prior to discharge into the existing City
storm sewer system.
13. The Development will be responsible for rerouting the
existing storm sewer system in Rahn Cliff Court which
discharges into the existing 18" storm sewer along the
westerly side of I -35E. The runoff from this area is
required to drain into Pond AP -44.
14. No encroachment below the 918 high water elevation for Pond
AP -44 will be allowed.
7-$
RAHNCLIFF 2ND ADDITION CONDITIONS:
15. All entrances into parking areas from public street right-
of-way and all major internal parking lot driving aisles are
required to be 30 feet wide minimum.
16. The Development is responsible for its proportionate share
of any major roadway improvements as necessitated by the
intensity of the proposed development as identified by the
City and County.
STANDARD CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL
A. Assessments
1. This development shall accept its additional assessment
obligations as defined in the staff's report in
accordance with the final plat dimensions and the rates
in effect at the time of final plat approval.
B. Ease,nents and Rights -of -Way
1. This development shall dedicate 10' drainage and utility
easements centered over all common lot lines and adjacent
to private property or public right-of-way.
2. This development shall dedicate, provide, or financially
guarantee its proportionate share of the acquisition
costs of additional drainage, ponding, and utility
easements as required by the alignment, depth, and
storage capacity of all required public utilities and
streets located beyond the boundaries of this plat or
outside of dedicated public right-of-way as necessary to
service this development.
3. This development shall dedicate all public right-of-way
and temporary slope easements for ultimate development of
adjacent roadways as required by the appropriate
jurisdictional agency.
4. This development shall dedicate adequate drainage and
ponding easements to incorporate the required high water
elevation necessitated by City storm water storage volume
requirements.
C. Plans and Specifications
1. All public streets and utilities necessary to provide
service to this development shall be designed by a
registered professional engineer in accordance with City
codes and engineering standards and policies, and
approved. by staff prior to final plat approval.
2. A detailed grading, drainage, erosion, and sediment
control plan must be prepared in accordance with current
City standards and approved by staff prior to final plat
approval.
3. This development shall insure that all temporary dead end
public streets shall have a cul-de-sac constructed in
accordance with City engineering standards.
4. A detailed landscape plan shall be submitted on the
proposed grading plan and approved by staff prior to the
final plat approval. The financial guarantee shall be
included in the Development Contract and not released
until one year after the date of installation.
STANDARD CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL
PAGE TWO
5. All internal public and private streets shall be
constructed within the required right-of-way in
accordance with City design standards.
D. Public Improvements
1. If any public improvements are to be installed under a
City contract, the appropriate project must be approved
by Council action prior to final plat approval.
E. Permits
1. This development shall be responsible for the acquisition
of all regulatory agency permits in the time frame
required by the affected agency.
F. Parks Dedication
1. This development shall fulfull its parks dedication
requirements as recommended by the Advisory Parks and
Recreation Commission and approved by Council action.
G. Other
1. All standard platting and zoning conditions shall be
adhered to unless specifically granted a variance by
Council action.
Advisory Planning Commission City Council
Approved: August 25, 1987 September 15, 1987
Revised:
LTS#2
STANDARD
ce
II IL'iuA I`ll h;N. r f
It
II „tet, j: -E; D -III ;.
j.1F I IlbL'J
I ,', 1 -At -17 L,IR t—iArr ,-4.4.tfyianvir4;i:I_J_, 1-,,.\[-L.1‘
74(0
•
.I .t ..' . „_.
DAKOTA ' COUP.
4
0
CO. RD. (CUFF ROAD)
'O(40AYTm ACC/W''
LOT 1
9 L O C K' `
44
1��� =' '
.•� +. i.1do 1 r. �••
2 RAHNCLJi:fr f.". COURT ,. , f„ti, . r"
ti I
r 1
a
I�1i0
OUTLOT
•
sA IOW (000/((T ('ti
O/
T.4 wOA+w lila( 0I TK
.0• 104 Of iO( ow1/• 0f NC. if
�0.
OUTLOT
p•
i. him 00.
b
O
/7
b
— ..
,RAHNCL/FF
+r Al
NN
l•(P00'ODe
COURT:
Ns -
PARCEL 51
/\ rt,q,
PARCEL
37
WATER SERVICE
•':.--4,"--4'44CLIFF ROAD FUTURE IMPROVEMENTS -- 530 F.F.
Lk
IDUI' i S LU 2!
N011iaaV~aNi dJ110N1-1VH
U \
/ 1–
••.,.O cJ \
/ / / 7
/ / /
IIT IODITIOM
/
\• N sf
OUTLOT B
0
/ /
/
v
O J
a J co
\
L
— y
1Mno3
JJI13MM.M
/ O ;
/ /
/ , /
• � 4.
i
/
^-•▪ .•-• J /
2 + /
1.
/
/
1
• /
ZQ / r
fie- O --I
/ ° In
c
. o
/' � 1,
/ �,,
Sd
O J
J CO
w w'50'24. .
.I c.t.n •
_; SI1 1
1
1
1 1
1 .
Ze
OM
1ano3
J111JMM..
W
v
(OVON 111131
JAM OIV
31.15
tJ
w 1..50•24. e
J11Ino,
•
Dur1II1.H •>J sawPi
NOLLVCJOSSV 1VNOISS3iO114 1:11111311:113
snuii/iltnrlt
if
311111 111_1a
9
7ld 31SS'
VZV1d +dn3r�KVH
i;•iia5r1 5
•t,,... -.r -*1; .4 .1:�
Tz7.:,4-T
- 1 1 1 1 d i11 1- 5 i111ii111' 1°
• - "Till 1 1 1 1 III I N 1 I 1
{'� / 111111 11'ri111(ln C---.›
n
ja �` F{ 1 `CI -4=1W '� I I t 1 1 1 1 ~ it
' ii II
•
II 11 Jillil„o,l:al,,,V —.
1
IItld111f14 o11111111d111
In
*•iliilllll i,i1111i1,:'I;.:i
0
1 IIIll,t i !Il!jjj1:1''1IialII''_!II
1
+, ll'lllli-4U I tiililiillrAllli1111111
,la:..moi
yJ> = J=
E s .,-=,
/ 1. x, 1 1 i t A ; l i :11 1 1 1 1 1 '
y �I
Ij -1 I l -til i 81
� $
i 11i I t O i
+ J a ?
Gl fEl l I Ii I I " -,
1.!`+11 1 r
J I �+/
.,`,��:
1
, 1 '
0' ,
----1
_ . LL ..-L-.1....-1. 1..A11-1..1 111. 1.1.11 -la. -1.-1 1..1111 4:1 LJ ,J
aro. -• nv
✓u1 ' h d �vl.,l,lLI 1
It d .§: a r. J a. Y . a
z> 5 6' § e i i
a i f 3' i I. �/ l
'�yl �AIl":”1-1VH
i333i1333°
a
. . �
9 , '.i iii ' •.i
1,112 .Iii
i
IE
i
i
. a; ci�rai1 c 33 1 e_
_1
, -I
7 7 1I 17. 1 ; Y .--`� ''
i �� (.{'��
'; III r:\i_L\I II� I
1 11'' 1
-^ �:r
Tit..31.111-1 iIIIr7IriII�i n 1
III'a.il'K'. i,yi ''�' 1I!I 11 il
+ 4a .l
�— ;N1m1111'„ �,'IIR�iI�f� Ili
Z CY 1. / 1 '
1'111 111111 I -1111111 ;11111 `�j•
;
-DuLi!Trtl1I
111H
i�
9
f
- 3
. _ S . i ; y
,Sail IaB SIi:
5
NVId AL1I111 ALIVNIINITELId
NM ' MVOVI
VZ1/1d HHl13NHVHA
841•11•77. r
1
I
• .`.-
i�i
ea
I 11
I!!�.yllll\!�
Il
r,•li'llllli� 1
Q 1! 1 1 11 1! I i �I III ! 111 ! jy l l! I! I I
jr577.771,17Lji i I I I I I I .H I I I ;S 11111 II i
i _ d
YI of
t-+•
\�
I a
/v! a'
:11 1 1 1 1 1 ,'1 l I 1111 1 1 I I i 1
7
OJ
,
� lid _
i _ glljlll
Ilt�llll'
1Ji'
Illlkilll!I
•
3,0• ..t13
i
s°\
LOT 2, BLOCK 1
y y F nsusn tH 10
,�dV 31�'�ll�dd
'
LOT 1, BLOCK 2
0
•
i
.y0
0
•
M 0
Nt
W
0 r
O 7.
cC
:matinmIII
U11tyi.1l d
_ CO. RD. (CUFF _ROAD)
r. .... , .,
min WA eis�as'�aO.ssWIr+ _7.______.
_
urr --1` —'I L�yrssffhursb-'r -\r
t l •pttgrll[0 ♦aG[tl�//'l �a ro.rr t0 00 /t[f t•LY �\ j,;
•I S I Os rK rnrrw li.i Of fK ya 7741/4 ,
NW I/O OF rwt r►r/. 00 SEC. al r r
LOT 1 ���
3 L 0 C .0.,i' z r
r trno• Iva
•. _,,,o'�..%n.7000. ; c` c-` �'.,, . OUTLOT 0
., I'� _�, ` 'yy -*..4-!..,
`, /
"r s RAHNCLlFf COURT;: '�"' ^`� �.
o '`'` .,,w4. 1
. , •..,r0,.0 eyrt!7/� 1i f
ani �. \ •,4 \�
\
CJ
0".".
(N1
1-
r 17)
rl)
L'J
U)
c,
l IJ
_-
'Q RAHNCL/FF
I•
�. ... ,r,...' -- ---3 y
IN:s.IN. F000
000
t0
:\\\Iz.,
J
OUTLOT p /
>4'
MAN • ur♦urr [utrtrr^
t�
CO. OF rr(Mwo/rN wwltye L.L/
!r0
0o ••t♦!♦
PARCEL 31
PARC(L IS
1 V
0)/
Ott _ 2%
g`•
4r4 ,
•J -j V!
awl
11
mammon LATERAL BENEFIT — STORM SEWER- 1124 F.F.
7-07:Z;,& LATERAL BENEFIT TRUNK FOR A(N. �SElWER - 559 F.F.
?I 10 y
r1
CJ
CJ
E n f
(1)
L 1J
a.. J
•r } •.�•�..�.
'otw.urm ,resss.'"
•
8 LOT 1
0 C �K1 . ▪ I
Soo moi yr. ��),. w
tr.
aaoos •` t
s RAHMCLIF�' COURT:: . ' .
2l -.. --� ..-,,,,:x
'S \
vi
• --A rotor .o 00 PIr/ 1'v
•lI 0I T./ •
w0.1, I. tut OF 1,1
UC
(I w Nt 1I�Of(N[wt1/♦Or If C. if
OUTLOT O
NI
1/
VVle
/
•�L
P RCEL ]1
. RAHNCLIFF
rr
yI
OUTLOT
v
4
aA.,w..r • urarrr [urfrrr�
mss. 1—
[O. of Mwrwwrfr frtwlf µC.u/
1111:1;firMn: FI 1111
1!0 0O 118•iM
41-4
•
PARCEL 37
4
1
• •+� -act rt r. sy,sa-1:811 :r
LSC ao alto
.��,i✓'� ai
ir
1 ‘,4 e
• oy r\of 1
�^ �R'.. 'I
..n+in... CLIFF ROAD - TRAIL - 530 F.F.
-=:7.7afI LATERAL BENEFIT FOR STORM SEWER -844 F.F.
111.11.1.1;1;m1,1,1,1;1LATERAL BENEFIT FOR SA I ARY SEWER -528 F.F.
11
��..
ifs '. iI.,.
--
-. •
II it iVER
7-11 ;1 i EST
is
••
r
T r..
ADDITION
-\
1
• N
w -s
2
15 j
7
OXKKOTA COUNTY : R, -c
SUBJECT PARCEL
F1G #2
city of eagan
r PUBLIC
ir",_V WORKS
�=� DEPARTMEN
SANITARY SEWER
MASTER PLAN
P-50 '818-A) \'''''',4(4'/ I/ /
1
8,88 -5 ..-/'%-; A P-42 / 86.0 ,i - .
, - /7 89.5.0 C
11:---.77--. rni __/(_404 :0
• — i — ;, Po' (I 'T" • 1
-..-:-• '..x:s::::!::::::::.:::::"5:,:::::: • / ' ,,
li ,:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•i::;.::.•.::::::.:i •
-:::11:. / •
( _ _. I, L A, T____•LI ,:ii.:*.-.....st,:. , 912.1
1
,
-- 9/9.3
cv 9
:911J //
'clfj21
BP; -22
26.0'
- 927. 4-,
c6 El
1935.0 -I •
1937.6
L _
1'933.9, !rot ,
-I 9.37.6 , •
(
v
i.92ao
r•
0260_1
, • -;r3F /. •
A
.1922
926; I
S A FAII•L--:-;")
ADO.
AP -17
926.0
9_40.
• p. -)11DC;
I-
! A
t -I • •-•
z.,••
4 • • 411
• ••
• 1. 1- ;01
• 1..`
471
}-'.V('.1934.0;
.151.3"
PAi:K --•1!
P! 5fl
R!5C•i---r .- r -
11; . ! • ._ (
L LI 1 i----' -Ns- • ----
7-_:•*-",9 1 5 - O..- • . •.-..__. ..--,,-- ,,. - -,----`'
! r cF1
1 7
i -cro,L . .4,
i
SA FL
E STATE
LP -
DAKOTA I COUNTY 'P';E3K 89359.3
A- yy "tt 900.0
A-xx 1
to
A-zz
SUBJECT PARCEL
FIG
city of eagan
PUBLIC
WORKS
DEPARTMEN
STORM SEWER
MASTER PLAN
approved:
standard
plate 4 :
Page 17/PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
June 28, 1988
Voracek stated he felt the Commission should give directions to
the Council as to why the motion failed.
Voracek moved, Garry seconded, the motion to deny the
preliminary plat of 1.91 CSC zoned acres and a conditional use permit
to allow a car wash facility and motor fuel sales and a variance for
a canopy setback located on a portion of existing Outlot B, Town
Centre 70 First Addition or proposed Outlot A, Town Centre 70 Ninth
Addition located between Highway 35E and Town Centre Drive in the
northwest quarter of Section 15.
Member Garry withdrew his second of the motion. Wilkins seconded
the motion. Garry, Pawlenty, Merkley and Graves voted in favor;
Voracek, Wilkins, and Trygg voted against.
AUSTIN COMPANIES - RAHNCLIFF SECOND ADDITION
Chairman Pawlenty then opened the next public hearing regarding
the request for a comprehensive guide plan amenament, a rezoning of
16.08 LB (limited business) ana RB (roadside business) acres to a
commercial planned development district and a preliminary plat
located at the southwest intersection of Cliff Road and Highway 35E
in the northwest quarter of Section 32.
Assistant City Planner Sturm informed the Commission the
proposed site is located between Rahn Roan and Highway 35E along the
south side of Cliff Road. The uses proposed tor this development are
consistent with the existing zoning districts. The planned
development zoning allows the City the opportunity to review the
overall development at this time as opposed to individual requests on
each lot. Architectural landscaping and signage compatability will be
addressed with this plat. He stated even though the uses are
consistent with the existing commercial zoning, a comprehensive guide
plan amendment would be necessary. Mr. Sturm stated the site is very
flat and highly visible from Highway 35E and there is no significant
vegetation for the City to be concerned with. Access will primarily
be from previously constructed RahnCliff Court with two secondary
drives connecting to Rahn Road. Shared parking areas provide•832
stalls, which is well above the amount required by code. Code
requires 730 to 815 stalls. Mr. Sturm updated the Commission as to
the breakdown of each proposed area and their proposed use.
Mr. Sturm stated the applicants had been very cooperative in
working with them regarding the project. He stated all building and
parking setbacks meet code requirements except for the 10 -toot drive
lane setback along Cliff Road, the 17 -foot parking setback along
Highway 35E and the 30 -toot building setback along the highway for
the office building. No separate action was necessary for these
deviations if the site plans are approved due to the planned
development zoning.
Page 18/PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
June 28, 1988
Mr. Sturm informed the Commission the landscape plan is very
complete and screens the parking area nicely. He stated the overall
landscape plan for the 16 acres is very well done. The plant material
selection, proposed spacing, and quantities will visually tie the
development together. Additionally, evergreens will be aaaed along
the highway to provide year-round color.
Assistant Planner Sturm noted the buildings would be constructed
on all sides with light and dark brick, accented with rock -raced
block or stucco and metal canopies. The design plan as submitted
requested two 30 -foot tall development signs located at the entry
points along Cliff and Rahn Roads and six 7 -foot tall monument signs
located throughout the site. The signs are architecturally compatible
with each other as well as with the buildings. However, Mr. Sturm
felt they should be reduced to the 27 -foot maximum height allowed by
code. Individual tenant pylon signs have been proposed in three
locations.
Mark Smith, representative of Austin Companies, stated the
current known users are Burger King, Pier I, and Drovers Bank. He
further stated the extensive lanascape plan properly screens the
buildings from 35E. He stated the architectural design allows for
canvas awnings across all rear exit doors to echo the front of the
building. He stated the buildings will be all brick construction and
the brick and mortar will be the same on each building. The brick
will be of earthtone shades. Mr. Smith presentea samples of the brick
to the Commission. Mr. Smith stated there will be sign bans on the
building for the tenants and they will not be located on the pylon
sign itself. He stated the same vendor for the sign bans will be usea
so that the signs are uniform. Mr. Smith stated the pylon sign will
be a maximum in height of 27 feet and they request the sign be
erected at Cliff and 35E.
Mr. Graves asked if the sign was to be visible from 35E. Mr.
Smith stated that was their request so it would be more visible to
the public.
Member Trygg addressed the problem regarding the existing
limited access to the development and asked whose decision this would
be. Mr. Foertsch stated the City can make a recommendation to the
County.
Ray Williams, Astleford, stated that in a settlement with the
County, the developer had a right to the right-in/right-out access.
Member Wilkins asked if there would be a median in Cliff Road
all the way down the roadway. Mr. Foertsch stated that was in the
plans but it is not known when it would be added.
Member Voracek requested the City staff to explain in greater
detail their concern regarding the phosphorus loading to Cliff Lake.
Lpi
Page 19/PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
June 28, 1988
Mr. Sturm reviewed staffs' concerns and the options regarding this
matter. He further stated that proposed condition number 9 deals with
t:he problem.
Mr. Garry asked if the grading, drainage ana erosion concerns
are dealt with in the proposea conditions. Mr. Sturm stated that
-condition C2 of the standard conditions for plat approval deals with
t:his question.
Member Voracek was concerned about the future traffic and the
potential of a dangerous intersection at Cliff and Rahn Roads. The
City traffic engineer consultant, Glen VanWormer, stated there will
be a traffic congestion problem at this intersection if the
development in the area continues at a rapid pace. If the development
in the area is phased in stages, the intersection should be able to
handle the traffic with continued road upgrades. He stated the
F,ahnCliff Development would create a little more traffic in the area
than expected.
Member Wilkins asked what the total square footage of the retail
business would be for the facilities and if a bank is considered
retail. Mr. Sturm stated banks are shown as specific use under the
limited business zoning. He further stated there would be 75,000
square feet of total retail space. Wilkins asked if 11 acres of the
proposed development would be roadside business. Mr. Sturm statea she
was correct. Member Wilkins asked it they were requesting a rezoning
of anything that was not currently on the Eagan Code books. She
stated Eagan does not have a commercial planned development district.
Mr. Sturm stated the City does have a planned development district
and that the word "commercial" was only used to be more specitic. He
stated this is a planned development district. Chairman Pawlenty
asked member Wilkins if she would prefer the word "commercial" be
deleted. Member Wilkins stated she would prefer it be called planned
development district. She further stated she feels there is too much
commercial construction in Eagan. Polls had been taken of the
residents and the residents felt they did not want more commercial
development in Eagan at this time. Wilkins further stated she feels
LB zoning should not be for retail development.
Commission member Graves stated all LB and RB zoning for this
development would be put together as a planned development agreement.
He stated this is for the City's own good as they can direct the
development in the direction they want the development to move.
City Attorney James Sheldon stated the Commission should
consider adding a condition regarding access and cross parking
Easements to be approved by the City.
Mr. Merkley stated he felt the proposal was very presentable and
it definitely showed quality development. He is concerned about the
traffic strain on the thoroughfare system. Chairman Pawlenty also
(oq
Page 20/PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
June 28, 1988
statea he is also concerned about the traffic congestion. He also
stated it was a nice presentation by the developer ana the Commission
appreciated its thoroughness.
Mr. Graves stated he felt the planned development district is to
the City's advantage and offers greater consistency in the area.
However, he was concerned about the transportation plan and the new
development standaras which will be discussed later at the meeting.
He statea he was in favor of the planned development district;
however, he felt the Commission should hold off on the preliminary
plat approval until further information regarding the transportation
plan ana the new development standards had been discusses and
reviewed.
Chairman Pawlenty questioned when the commercial study would be
completed. City Planner Dale Runkle stated it was hopeful within the
next 30 days. Member Wilkins noted that there was a joint meeting
scheduled with the Council and the Planning Commission and asked it
the survey results could be reviewed at that time. Mr. Runkle statea
there would be a joint meeting in July and the survey could and woula
be discusses if the survey was completed.
Mr. Garry stated this project is quality construction and is
what the Commission has looked for and wanted in aevelopment
projects. He stated there is the potential traffic problem and
suggested asking the County for their assistance.
Ray Williams stated that the 22 acres was originally all RB
zoning and a portion of the property was previously rezoned to LB as
a buffer to the residential areas. Member Garry asked for an
explanation between RB and LB zoning. Mr. Sturm statea LB zoning was
commercial zoning and RB was transient such as large service
stations.
The developer informed the Commission that a lot of thought had
gone into the development layout regarding the RB and LB zoning.
Chairman Pawlenty asked Mr. Williams -to update the Commission on
the background of the area. Mr. Williams discussed the background of
the property and further stated that the streets and utilities had
been installed. The developer had been working on the project for
four years and had definite plans for the area. Chairman Pawlenty
stated the development was a quality development and it was a good
location for the development; however, he felt there were concerns
the Commission needed to address.
Member Garry stated there was no public opposition at the
meeting and consequently apparently no public concerns regarding the
development.
Page 21/PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
June 28, 1988
Mr. Voracek suggested the decrease of the amount of the parking
stalls for the area since Mr. Sturm has stated 832 stalls for parking
would be in excess of what was needed. He suggested putting in
additional green space insteaa of additional parking space. He felt
this was a suggestion to the developer only and it was not necessary
to add his suggestion as a condition. The developer stated he would
have no problem removing more parking stalls.
Graves moved, Voracek seconded, the motion to approve the
rezoning of 16.08 LB (limited business) ana RB (roadside business)
acres to a planned development district. Pawlenty, Garry, Voracek,
Trygg, Merkley and Graves voted in favor; Wilkins voted against.
Member Wilkins stated she opposed the approval of the rezoning at
that time because she felt the approval should have waited for the
commercial study results. She further stated she was against the
rezoning of roadside to retail as she felt there was enough
commercial development in the City of Eagan at this time.
Trygg moved, Garry seconded, the motion to approve the
comprehensive guide plan amendment of 16.08 limited business and
roadside business acres. Pawlenty, Garry, Voracek, Trygg, Merkley and
Graves voted in favor; Wilkins voted against.
Trygg moved, Garry seconded, the motion to approve the
preliminary plat located at the southwest intersection of Cliff Road
and Highway 35E in the northwest quarter of Section 32, subject to
the following conditions:
1. These standard conditions of plat approval as adopted by
Council action on September 15, 1987 shall be complied with: Al, B1,
B2, B3, B4, Cl, C2, C4, C5, D1, El, Fl, and G1.
2. A Planned Development Agreement shall be entered into for a
period of five years.
3. Lot Two. (2) , Block One (1) ; Lot One (1) , Block Two (2) ; and
Lot Three (3), Block Three (3) shall be approved at this time. All
other lots and outlots will be reviewed by the Advisory Planning
Commission and City Council.
4. All signage shall be subject to the one—time signage fee of
$2.50 per square foot. The overall sign plan as shown on the site
plan shall be approved. A 27 foot maximum height shall be adhered to.
5. All trash shall be contained within the buildings except for
the fast—food facility on Lot One (1) , Block Three (3) .
6. Rooftop mechanical equipment shall not be visible from the=-
adjacent roads or Highway 35E.
Page 22/PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
June 28, 1988
7. The building and parking setbacks shall be allowed as
exhibited on the site plan dated May 16, 1988.
8. The development is required to revise the proposed watermain
design. The proposed design interconnects two different pressure
zones.
9. The development is required to limit phosphorus loadings to
Cliff Lake to pre -development levels.
10. No direct connection to the existing 21 inch storm sewer
along the south side of Cliff Road will be allowed.
11. No direct connection to the existing 18 inch storm sewer line
along the westerly side of I -35E will be allowed.
12. The development is limited to approximately 10 CFS of storm
water runoff which it can discharge directly into the existing 30
inch storm sewer which crosses Cliff Road at the northeasterly corner
of the development and flows into Pond AP -42. All remaining site
generated runoff must be routed through Pond AP -44 prior to discharge
into the existing City storm sewer system.
13. The development will be responsible for rerouting the
existing storm sewer system in Rahn Cliff Court which discharges into
the existing 18 inch storm sewer along the westerly side of I -35E.
The runoff from this area is required to drain into Pond AP -44.
14. No encroachment below the 918 high water elevation for Pond
AP -44 will be allowed.
15. All entrances into parking areas from public street
right-of-way and all major internal parking lot driving aisles are
required to be 30 feet wide minimum.
16. The development is responsible for its proportionate share of
any major roadway improvements as necessitated by the intensity of
the proposed development as identified by the City and County.
17. Access and cross -parking easements shall be approved by the
City.
18." City staff to request County review of the Cliff and Rahn
Road intersections regarding future traffic congestion.
Pawlenty, Garry, Voracek, Trygg, Merkley and Graves voted in
favor; Wilkins voted against.
Mr. Voracek asked if the PD would address the sign issues. Mr.
Sturms stated it was in the signage plan.
Jilly 19, 1988
All voted in favor. ::::::
Egan moved, McCrea secoftdeCtIW:mation to approve a
Conditional Use Permit to allowa::caragh facility and motor fuel
sales in a CSC District. All.f.voted in favor.
Egan moved, Wachter se66hded, the motion to approve a variance
for the canopy setback of 20 feet for the gasoline pump island
located on a portion of existing Outlot B, Town Centre First
Addition or proposed Outlot A.
After discussion betweii: theqOuncilmembers, it was decided
there was no hardship to base theariance upon. Councilmember Egan
withdrew his motion regardinil theariance.
Mr. Berg requested a cOiii.i.grading and foundation
permit. He also requested thTd4neii70 Tenth Addition be
placed on the next agenda for final plat approval. Mr. Hedges
stated the matter could not be put on the next Council agenda
because the developer had not met the requirements for final plat
approval. He further stated that early approval of foundation and
grading permits puts a hardship on the.sfaff and recommended
against early approval.
McCrea stated she feel here should be no pressures put on
the staff to move one plat ahea4of other plats.
RAHNCLIFF SECONDDWTION
City Administrator Hedges stated a public hearing was held by
the Advisory Planning Commission at their regular meeting on June
28, :L988 to consider applications for the rezoning of 5.6 Limited
Business and 11.2 Roadside Business to a commercial planned
development district and a pre4minary.plat for the Rahncliff
Second Addition. In addition -P4Cc*IP.f0hive Guide Plan Amendment
was required. He stated the AC re4OMMended approval of the
applications.
City Planner Runkle st0.0.AW#tP.„.is located between Rahn
Road and Highway 35E along itiO4WMCof Cliff Road. He stated
the uses proposed for this developmeliE are consistent with the
existing zoning districts. The planned development zoning allows
the City the opportunity to review the overall development at this
time as opposed to individual requests on each lot. Also,
architectural landscaping and sig0.114.0ompatibility will be
addressed with this plat. Mr.443aded the site is very flat
and highly visible from HighOW35E. A644s would be primarily from
the previously constructed Rahncliff Courand to secondary drives
connecting to Rahn Road. Shared parking aXeas provide 832 stalls,
well above the amount requirlpy_co44.011 is 730 to 815 stalls.
Mr. Runkle described the bre4100W''.-ii::4.-W. area and the proposed
July 19, 1988
use to the Council. He statedaccess and cross -parking easements
needed to be approved by the' City.
Ray Williams presented:'the:. c evelopthent plans to the Council.
Roger Grant presented the landscape plan to the Council. The
exterior design and building *samples were shown to the
Councilmembers.
Councilmember Wachter inquired what happened to the hotel. Mr.
Williams stated the surveys did not show enough people in the area
and the hotels could not get::::financing for the project.
Mayor Ellison complimented the:: developer on the landscaping
and exterior design. Mr. Egan stated the landscape and exterior
design were excellent in his.•op,inion. Mr. Egan stated there was
very significant zoning changbt4attht Council was addressing at
the meeting and that adding 'tetai1:':was'.ri t allowed under the
current zoning. He stated he felt the Council needed to review the
retail study and the possible traffic problems before acting on the
matter.
Councilmember Wachter stated heagrees with Mr. Egan on the
zoning problem. Mr. Williams stated::: they" have tried to meet the
requirements of the RB zoninw. jptutthat:: at the present time the
developer could not get a hQtel"in thearea. Mr. Wachter stated the
project may be premature for..trie::; _ax.ea� ' Councilmember McCrea stated
that she had reviewed the code "]k:RB zoning and stated it
eliminates alot of uses and she feel': tteRB zoning should be
reviewed.
Councilmember McCrea stated the retail study would be
completed soon and the Council would be meeting in a workshop to
review the study.
Wachter moved, Egan seoOtnpire ::: t e::: lotion to continue the
Comprehensive Guide Plan Ameiiment:, a. rezoning of 16.08 LB and
RBacres to a Commercial Plariried Development and a preliminary plat
entitled• Rahncliff Second -Ad tiorn:ntil the August 16, 1988 City
Council Meeting to allow thy::: ounc 1.:::9:.:,review the retail study.
All voted in favor.
AD HOC SENIOR HOUSING SITE SELECTION COMMITTEE
City Administrator Hedges stated that at a Special Joint
Workshop Meeting of the City CQ ::::and Advisory Planning
Commission authorization was •:c i reii'#xe City Council to establish
an Ad Hoc Senior Housing Site.:: Selection::Committee for the purpose
of reviewing five sites that''•the City is. :::considering for
acquisition to construct a Sdnior Housinq::Project in future years.
He stated the Eagan Senior e tizens:.:.mg0fionthly and their noon
luncheon was Wednesday, July;1h oi.ttiveJace, the Planning Intern,
'73
Agenda Information Memo
August 16, 1988, City Council Meeting
NEW BUSINESS
G.O. AND SPECIAL ASSESSMENT BOND SALE DATE
A. Establish Bond Sale Date of $1,850,000 General Obligation
Fire Stations, Land and Equipment Bonds and $13,400,000 Special
Assessment General Obligation Public Improvement Bonds of 1988 --
Upon selection of Springsted as the City's new financial
consultant, work was begun on structuring a bond sale for the
fall of 1988. Proposed to be included in the bond sale are
$1,850,000 of General Obligation bonds and $13,400,000 of Special
Assessment improvement bonds. The General Obligation bonds which
were approved in the referendum of May 28, 1987, are for the
purpose of financing the purchase of land, constructing and
furnishing two (2) fire stations and purchasing pumpers and
related equipment. The Special Assessment bonds all of which
will be paid by assessments against benefitting property owners
are for the purpose of financing numerous public improvements
which are either under construction or have been constructed. A
sale date of September 20, 1988, has been selected with bids
opened during the day and the bids awarded at the regular City
Council meeting on that date. For additional information on this
item, refer to the sale memos prepared by Springsted providing
detailed information on each of these gxoposed bo_Op sales. This
information is enclosed on pages 7 through Finance
Director VanOverbeke will be present to answer any questions the
City Council might have regarding the two sales.
A bond sale rating trip to New York has tentatively been
scheduled for September 7 and 8 to present updated information
about the City and its financing requirements to Moodys and
Standard & Poor pending additional review and City Council
authorization. Given the size of this issue and the fact that
the last in-person presentation was made in 1985, it is felt that
this trip would be appropriate and in the City's best interest.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To schedule a bond .sale
for September 20, 1988, at which time bids will be opened and
award considered for the sale of $1,850,000 General Obligation
bonds and $13,400,000 Special Assessment improvement bonds and to
authorize a rating trip to New York.
OFFICIAL TERMS OF OFFERING
$13,400,000
CITY OF EAGAN, MINNESOTA
GENERAL OBLIGATION IMPROVEMENT BONDS, SERIES I 988A
Sealed bids for the Bonds will be opened by the City on Tuesday, September 20, 1988, at 11:00 A.M.,
Central Time, at the offices of SPRINGSTED Incorporated, 85 East Seventh Place, Suite 100, Saint
Paul, Minnesota 55101-2143. Consideration for award of the Bonds will be by the City Council at
6:30 P.M., Central Time, of the same day.
DETAILS OF THE BONDS
The Bonds will be dated October 1, 1988, as the date of original issue, and will bear interest payable
on February 1 and August 1 of each year, commencing August 1, 1989. Interest will be computed
upon the basis of a 360 -day year of twelve 30 -day months and will be rounded pursuant to rules of the
MSRB. The Bonds will be issued in the denomination of $5,000 each, or in integral multiples thereof
as requested by the Purchaser, and fully registered as to principal and interest. Principal will be
payable at the main corporate office of the Registrar and interest on each Bond will be payable by
check or draft of the Registrar mailed to the registered holder thereof at his address as it appears on
the books of the Registrar as of the 15th day of the calendar month next preceding the interest
payment.
The Bonds will mature February I in the amounts and years as follows:
$1,000,000 1990 $1,300,000 1993 $1,000,000 1995-1999 $400,000 2001-2004
$1,400,000 1991-1992 $1,200,000 1994 $ 500,000 2000
OPTIONAL REDEMPTION
The City may elect on February 1, 1994, and on any interest payment date thereafter, to prepay
Bonds due on or after February I, 1995. Redemption may be in whole or in part of the Bonds subject
to prepayment. If redemption is in part, those Bonds remaining unpaid which have the latest maturity
date will be prepaid first. If only part of the Bonds having a common maturity date are called for
prepayment the specific Bonds to be prepaid will be chosen by lot by the Registrar. All prepayments
shall be at a price of par and accrued interest.
SECURITY AND PURPOSE
The Bonds will be general obligations of the City for which the City will pledge its full faith and
credit and power to levy direct general ad valorem taxes. In addition the City will pledge special
assessments against benefited property. The proceeds will be used to finance the construction of
various improvements within the City.
TYPE OF BID
A sealed bid for not less than $13,253,978 and accrued interest on the total principal amount of the
Bonds shall be filed with the undersigned prior to the time set for the opening of bids. Also prior to
the time set for bid opening, a certified or cashier's check in the amount of $134,000, payable to the
order of the City, shall have been filed with the undersigned or SPRINGSTED Incorporated, the City's
Financial Advisor. No bid will be considered for which said check has not been filed. The check of
the Purchaser will be retained by the City as liquidated damages in the event the Purchaser fails to
comply with the accepted bid. The City will deposit the check of the Purchaser, the amount of which
will be deducted at settlement. No bid shall be withdrawn after the time set for opening bids unless
the meeting of the City scheduled for consideration of the bids is adjourned, recessed, or continued to
another date without award of the Bonds having been made. Rates offered by Bidders shall be in
integral multiples of 5/100 or 1/8 of 1%. No rate for any maturity shall be more than I% lower than
any prior rate. Bonds of the same maturity shall bear a single rate from the date of the Bonds to the
date of maturity. No bid may be conditioned upon award of any other offering of obligations by the
City.
AWARD
The Bonds will be awarded to the Bidder offering the lowest dollar interest cost to be determined by
the deduction of the premium, if any, from, or the addition of any amount less than par, to the total
dollar interest on the Bonds from their date to their final scheduled maturity. The City's
computation of the total net dollar interest cost of each bid, in accordance with customary practice,
will be controlling.
The City will reserve the right to: (i) waive non -substantive informalities of any bid or of matters
relating to the receipt of bids and award of the Bonds, (ii) reject all bids without cause, and, (111)
reject any bid which the City determines to have failed to comply with the terms herein.
REGISTRAR
The City will name the Registrar which shall be subject to applicable SEC regulations. The City will
pay for the services of the Registrar.
CUSIP NUMBERS
If the Bonds qualify for assignment of CUSIP numbers such numbers will be printed on the Bonds, but
neither the failure to print such numbers on any Bond nor any error with respect thereto will
constitute cause for failure or refusal by the Purchaser to accept delivery of the Bonds. The CUSIP
Service Bureau charge for the assignment of CUSIP identification numbers shall be paid by the
Purchaser.
SETTLEMENT
Within 40 days following the date of their award, the Bonds will be delivered without cost to the
Purchaser at a place mutually satisfactory to the City and the Purchaser. Delivery will be subject to
receipt by the Purchaser of an approving legal opinion of Faegre & Benson of Minneapolis, Minnesota,
which opinion will be printed on the Bonds, and of customary closing papers, including a no -litigation
certificate. On the date of settlement payment for the Bonds shall be made in federal, or equivalent,
funds which shall be received at the offices of the City, or its designee, not later than 1:00 P.M.,
Central Time. Except as compliance with the terms of payment for the Bonds shall have been made
impossible by action of the City, or its agents, the Purchaser shall be liable to the City for any loss
suffered by the City by reason of the Purchaser's non-compliance with said terms for payment.
OFFICIAL STATEMENT
Underwriters may obtain a copy of the Official Statement by request to the City's Financial Advisor
prior to the bid opening. The Purchaser will be provided with 50 copies of the Official Statement.
Dated August 16, 1988 BY ORDER OF THE CITY COUNCIL
/s/ Eugene Van Overbeke
Clerk -Treasurer
OFFICIAL TERMS OF OFFERING
$1,850,000
CITY OF EAGAN, MINNESOTA
GENERAL OBLIGATION FIRE FACILITIES BONDS, SERIES 19888
Sealed bids for the Bonds will be opened by the City on Tuesday, September 20, 1988, at 11:00 A.M.,
Central Time, at the offices of SPRINGSTED Incorporated, 85 East Seventh Place, Suite 100, Saint
Paul, Minnesota 55101-2143. Consideration for award of the Bonds will be by the City Council at
6:30 P.M., Central Time, of the same day.
DETAILS OF THE BONDS
The Bonds will be dated October I, 1988, as the date of original issue, and will bear interest payable
on Feb-uary 1 and August 1 of each year, commencing August 1, 1989. Interest will be computed
upon the basis of a 360 -day year of twelve 30 -day months and will be rounded pursuant to rules of the
MSRB. The Bonds will be issued in the denomination of $5,000 each, or in integral multiples thereof
as requested by the Purchaser, and fully registered as to principal and interest. Principal will be
payable at the main corporate office of the Registrar and interest on each Bond will be payable by
check or draft of the Registrar mailed to the registered holder thereof at his address as it appears on
the books of the Registrar as of the 15th day of the calendar month next preceding the interest
payment.
The Bonds will mature February I in the amounts and years as follows:
$35,000 1990
$30,000 1991
$85,000 1992
$95,000 1993
$100,000 1994
$105,000 1995
$110,000 1996
$120,000 1997
$130,000 1998
$135,000 1999
$145,000 2000
$160,000 2001
OPTIONAL REDEMPTION
$170,000 2002
$185,000 2003
$195,000 2004
The City may elect on February I, 1996, and on any interest payment date thereafter, to prepay
Bonds due on or after February I, 1997. Redemption may be in whole or in part of the Bonds subject
to prepayment. If redemption is in part, those Bonds remaining unpaid which have the latest maturity
date will be prepaid first. If only part of the Bonds having a common maturity date are called for
prepayment the specific Bonds to be prepaid will be chosen by lot by the Registrar. All prepayments
shall be at a price of par and accrued interest.
SECURITY AND PURPOSE
The Bonds will be general obligations of the City for which the City will pledge its full faith and
credit and power to levy direct general ad valorem taxes. The proceeds will be used for the
acquisition and betterment of fire stations and equipment.
TYPE OF BID
A sealed bid for not Tess than $1,829,650 and accrued interest on the total principal amount of the
Bonds shall be filed with the undersigned prior to the time set for the openingof bids. Also prior to
the time set for bid opening, a certified or cashier's check in the amount of 18,500, payable to the
order of the City, shall have been filed with the undersigned or SPRINGSTED Incorporated, the City's
Financial Advisor. No bid will be considered for which said check has not been filed. The check of
the Purchaser will be retained by the City as liquidated damages in the event the Purchaser fails to
1 1
comply with the accepted bid. The City will deposit the check of the Purchaser, the amount of which
will be deducted at settlement. No bid shall be withdrawn after the time set for opening bids unless
the meeting of the City scheduled for consideration of the bids is adjourned, recessed, or continued to
another date without award of the Bonds having been made. Rates offered by Bidders shall be in
integral multiples of 5/100 or 1/8 of 1%. No rate for any maturity shall be more than l% lower than
any prior rate. Bonds of the same maturity shall bear a single rate from the date of the Bonds to the
date of maturity. No bid may be conditioned upon award of any other offering of obligations by the
City.
AWARD
The Bonds will be awarded to the Bidder offering the lowest dollar interest cost to be determined by
the deduction of the premium, if any, from, or the addition of any amount Tess than par, to the total
dollar interest on the Bonds from their date to their final scheduled maturity. The City's
computation of the total net dollar interest cost of each bid, in accordance with customary practice,
will be controlling.
The City will reserve the right to: (i) waive non -substantive informalities of any bid or of matters
relating to the receipt of bids and award of the Bonds, (ii) reject all bids without cause, and, (iii)
reject any bid which the City determines to have failed to comply with the terms herein.
REGISTRAR
The City will name the Registrar which shall be subject to applicable SEC regulations. The City will
pay for the services of the Registrar.
CUSIP NUMBERS
If the Bonds qualify for assignment of CUSIP numbers such numbers will be printed on the Bonds, but
neither the failure to print such numbers on any Bond nor any error with respect thereto will
constitute cause for failure or refusal by the Purchaser to accept delivery of the Bonds. The CUSIP
Service Bureau charge for the assignment of CUSIP identification numbers shall be paid by the
Purchaser.
SETTLEMENT
Within 40 days following the date of their award, the Bonds will be delivered without cost to the
Purchaser at a place mutually satisfactory to the City and the Purchaser. Delivery will be subject to
receipt by the Purchaser of an approving legal opinion of Faegre & Benson of Minneapolis, Minnesota,
which opinion will be printed on the Bonds, and of customary closing papers, including a no -litigation
certificate. On the date of settlement payment for the Bonds shall be made in federal, or equivalent,
funds which shall be received at the offices of the City, or its designee, not later than 1:00 P.M.,
Central Time. Except as compliance with the terms of payment for the Bonds shall have been made
impossible by action of the City, or its agents, the Purchaser shall be liable to the City for any loss
suffered by the City by reason of the Purchaser's non-compliance with said terms for payment.
OFFICIAL STATEMENT
Underwriters may obtain a copy of the Official Statement by request to the City's Financial Advisor
prior to the bid opening. The Purchaser will be provided with 50 copies of the Official Statement.
Dated August 16, 1988 BY ORDER OF THE CITY COUNCIL
/s/ Eugene Van Overbeke
Clerk -Treasurer
-2 3
Agenda Information Memo
August 16, 1988, City Council Meeting
1988 CITY CODE REVISION
B. 1988 City Code Revision --City staff and City Attorney Sheldon
have met with representatives of Municipal Ordinance Codifiers to
incorporate ordinance additions and modification made by the
City Council since last year. Enclosed on pages yO- 01(( you will
find a memorandum from Finance Director VanOverbeke covering code
modifications made necessary by the ordinance amendments in
edition since June of 1987. The revisions are summarized by
chapter. Also enclosed on pages g� - cu are two ordinances
recommended for consideration by the codifier to bring the code
into compliance with state law. The first ordinance would be
incorporated into chapter 1 and increases the penalty for a petty
misdemeanor from $100 - $200. A second ordinance would be
incorporated into chapter 5 by modifying the definition of an
"exclusive liquor store", allowing a resident alien to hold a
liquor license and clarifying language regarding hours and days
o.E sale.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: 1. To approve or deny an
ordinance amending City Code, chapter 1, to increase the maximum
penalty for a petty misdemeanor from $100 - $200 and to direct
same for publication. 2. To approve or deny an ordinance
amending chapter 5 of the Eagan City Code pertaining to the
definition of an exclusive liquor store, ownership of a liquor
license by a resident alien and clarifying language pertaining to
hours and days of sale for beer, wine and liquor and directing
same to be published, and 3. To approve or deny amendments to
the Eagan City Code, chapters 1 - 6, 9 and 13, incorporating
ordinances 50 - 65.
MEMO TO: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES
FROM: FINANCE DIRECTOR/CITY CLERK VANOVERBEKE
DATE: AUGUST 8, 1988
SUBJECT: 1988 CITY CODE REVISION
City staff and City Attorney Sheldon have recently met with
Rodger Jensen and Lorraine O'Reilly of Municipal Ordinance
Codifiers. The meetings was for the purpose of reviewing
ordinances adopted by the City since the last revision as well as
potential amendments resulting from State law changes.
Attached is a copy of the revision memo written by Municipal
Ordinance Codifiers as well as copies of the two (2) ordinances
which they are proposing that have not previously been reviewed
by the City Council.
The complete Code revision by chapter is as follows:
Chapter 1:
1. This amendment (Ordinance #64 if approved) is being
proposed by the codifiers to bring the Code into
compliance with State law and increases the penalty for a
petty misdemeanor from $100 to $200.
Chapter 2:
1. Ordinance #53 was approved by the City Council in January
of 1988 and covers for the terms for advisory commissions.
2. Ordinance #62 which allows certain City employees to issue
citations was approved in June of 1988.
Chapter 4:
1. Ordinance #56 adds a reference to the temporary sign
policy and was approved in June of 1988.
2. Ordinance #57 also approved in June of 1988 requires a
certificate of survey to be submitted with building permit
applications.
Chapter 5:
1. Ordinance #52 approved in October of 1987 allows for the
sale of strong beer for persons holding both an on -sale
wine and beer license.
STAFF MEMO
AUGUST 8, 1988
PAGE TWO
2. Ordinance #58 approved in June of 1987 allows for the
change in corporate name of a beer licensee without
considering it a transfer if certain conditions are met.
3. Ordinance #59 approved in June of 1987 allows beer and
malt liquor in park or recreational areas subject to
certain restrictions and limitations.
4. Ordinance #60 approved in June of 1987 removed the 5%
ownership restriction from off -sale beer licensing
requirements.
5. Ordinance #63 approved in June of 1987 changes the
revocation and suspension provisions for liquor license
holders.
Municipal Ordinance Codifiers is proposing an amendment
(Ordinance #65, if approved) which brings the definition of an
"exclusive liquor store" into compliance with State Statutes,
allows for a resident alien to hold a liquor license and
clarifies certain language regarding hours and days of sale,
again more closely following the language of the statute.
Chapter 6:
1. Ordinance #50 was approved in June of 1987 and defines the
specific conditions providing for pull tab gambling.
Chapter 9:
1. Ordinance #61 was approved in June of 1988 and further
limits parking for the purpose of advertising or selling
merchandise.
Chapter 11:
1. Ordinance #55 which removes the service bay requirement
was approved in June of 1988.
Chapter 13:
1. Ordinance #51 approved in June of 1987 changed certain
minimum right-of-way widths for public streets.
2. Ordinance #54 approved in June of 1988 clarified certain
park dedication requirements.
STAFF MEMO
AUGUST 8, 1988
PAGE THREE
Since they have been previously reviewed and approved, I have
not included copies of ordinances 50 - 63. If you would like
copies, please advise.
Upon approval and publication of ordinances 64 and 65, revision
pages will be prepared for insertion in the Code. Please let me
know if you desire any additional information or if you would
like to discuss any of the ordinances in more detail.
Finance Director/City Clerk
cc: Jim Sheldon
Liz Witt
EJV/kf
c2
REVISION MEMO - EAGAN
July 14, 1988
TO: James F. Sheldon, Eagan City Attorney
FROM: Lorraine E. O'Reilly, Codifier
RE: 1988 City Code Revisions
We herewith hand you ordinances amending Chapters 1 and 5 of the
City Code. You will note that the number has been left blank on
each of the ordinances, but a number should be assigned prior to
adoption and publication.
The enclosed ordinances, together with the covering memo should
be reviewed by you and the City staff prior to being submitted to
the Council for its consideration. After the ordinances have
been adopted and published, please forward published copies to
our office so that we are aware of any changes which have been
made in the City's review. The revision pages will then be
prepared by our office for insertion in the Code.
CHAPTER 1
Sec. 1.02, Subd. 14, has been amended to increase the penalty for
a petty misdemeanor to $200.00 in accordance with Chapter 329,
Laws 1987.
CHAPTER 2
Ordinances numbered 53 and 62 will be inserted in preparing the
revision pages.
CHAPTER 4
Ordinances numbered 56 and 57 will be inserted in preparing the
revision pages.
CHAPTER 5
The definition of an exclusive liquor store is updated in accor-
dance with the statute, and Subd. 8 of Sec. 5.02 updated and
includes a resident alien as an eligible applicant as provided by
statute. Provisions relating to hours and days of sale are
amended to delete the reference to "weekdays" and to more closely
follow the language of the statute. Subd. 15 is added to Sec.
5.52 as requested in accordance with MSA 340A.410, Subd. 9.
Ordinances numbered 52, 58, 59, 60 and 63 will be inserted in
preparing the revision pages.
CHAPTER 6
Ordinance No. 50 will be inserted in preparing the revision pages
unless Sec. 6.35 is amended in accordance with our correspondence
with the City Attorney.
CHAPTER 9
Ordinance No. 61 will be inserted in preparing the revision pages.
CHAPTER 11
Ordinance No. 55 will be inserted in preparing the revision pages.
CHAPTER 13
Ordinances numbered 51 and 54 will be inserted in preparing the
revision pages.
c: Gene Van Overbeke, City Clerk-Treasurery
(with copies of ordinances)
-2-
9
ORDINANCE NO. , 2ND SERIES
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EAGAN, MINNESOTA, AMENDING CITY
CODE CHAPTER 1 ENTITLED "GENERAL PROVISIONS AND DEFINITIONS
APPLICABLE TO THE ENTIRE CITY CODE INCLUDING PENALTY FOR
VIOLATION" BY CHANGING THE PROVISION FOR VIOLATION OF A PETTY
MISDEMEANOR; AND, MAKING THIS ORDINANCE APPLICABLE TO EVERY
CHAPTER, SECTION OR OTHER PROVISION OF THE EAGAN CITY CODE.
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EAGAN DOES ORDAIN:
Section 1. Eagan City Code Sec. 1.02 entitled "Definitions"
is hereby amended by changing Subd. 14, to read:
Subd. 14. "Petty Misdemeanor" means an offense,
which does not constitute a crime, and for which a sentence
of a fine of not more than $200.00 may be imposed.
Section 2. This ordinance shall be applicable to every
chapter, section, or other provision of the Eagan City Code.
Section 3. Effective Date. This ordinance shall take
eEfect upon its adoption and publication according to law.
ATTEST: CITY OF EAGAN
CITY COUNCIL
By:
Its Clerk Its Mayor
Date Ordinance Adopted:
Date Ordinance Published:
ORDINANCE NO. , 2ND SERIES
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EAGAN, MINNESOTA, AMENDING EAGAN
CITY CODE CHAPTER 5 ENTITLED "BEER, WINE AND LIQUOR LICENSING AND
REGULATION" BY CHANGING PROVISIONS RELATING TO DEFINITION OF
EXCLUSIVE LIQUOR STORE, PERSONS DISQUALIFIED, SALE BY EMPLOYEE
AND HOURS AND DAYS OF SALE; BY ADDING A PROVISION RELATING TO
COIN-OPERATED AMUSEMENT DEVICES; AND, BY ADOPTING BY REFERENCE,
EAGAN CITY CODE CHAPTER 1 AND SECTION 5.99 WHICH, AMONG OTHER
THINGS, CONTAIN PENALTY PROVISIONS.
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EAGAN DOES ORDAIN:
Section 1. Eagan City Code Section 5.01 entitled
"Definitions" is hereby amended by changing Item 9, to read:
9. "Exclusive Liquor Store" means an establish-
ment used exclusively for the sale of liquor except for the
incidental sale of ice, tobacco, beer, beverages for mixing
with liquor, soft drinks, cork extraction devices, and books
and videos on the use of alcoholic beverages in the
preparation of food, and the establishment may offer
recorded or live entertainment.
Section 2. Eagan City Code Sec. 5.02 entitled "Applications
and Licenses Under This Chapter - Procedure and Administration"
is hereby amended by changing Subd. 8, to read:
Subd. 8. Persons Disqualified.
A. No license under this Chapter may be
issued to: (1) a person not a citizen of the United States
or a resident alien; (2) a person who within five years of
the license application has been convicted of a willful
violation of a Federal or State law or local ordinance
governing the manufacture, sale, distribution, or possession
for sale or distribution, of alcoholic beverages; (3) a
person who has had an alcoholic beverage license revoked
within five years of the license application, or to any
person who at the time of the violation owns any interest,
whether as a holder of more than five percent of the capital
stock of a corporate licensee, as a partner or otherwise, in
the premises or in the business conducted thereon, or to a
corporation, partnership, association, enterprise, business,
or firm in which any such person is in any manner
interested; (4) a person under the age of twenty-one years;
or, (5) a person not of good moral character and repute.
B. No person holding a license from the
Commissioner as a manufacturer, brewer or wholesaler may
have any ownership, in whole or in part, in a business
holding an alcoholic beverage license from the City.
read:
read:
read:
read:
Section 3. Eagan City Code Sec. 5.10 is hereby amended, to
SEC. 5.10. SALE BY EMPLOYEE. Any sale of an alcoholic
beverage in or from any premises licensed under this Chapter
by any employee authorized to make such sale in or from such
place is the act of the employer as well as of the person
actually making the sale; and every such employer is liable
to all of the penalties, except criminal penalties, provided
by law for such sale, equallywith the person actually
making the sale.
Section 4. Eagan City Code Sec. 5.34 is hereby amended, to
SEC. 5.34. HOURS AND DAYS OF BEER SALES. No sale of
beer shall be made between the hours of 1:00 o'clock A.M.
and 8:00 o'clock A.M. on the days of Monday through
Saturday, nor between the hours of 1:00 o'clock A.M. and
12:00 o'clock noon on Sunday.
Section 5. Eagan City Code Sec. 5.53 is hereby amended, to
SEC. 5.53. HOURS AND DAYS OF LIQUOR SALES. Except as
otherwise provided in Section 5.54, no on -sale shall be made
after 1:00 o'clock A.M. on Sunday, nor between 12:00 o'clock
midnight and 8:00 o'clock A.M. on Monday, nor between the
hours of 1:00 o'clock A.M. and 8:00 o'clock A.M. on Tuesday
through Saturday. No off -sale shall be made on Sunday nor
before 8:00 o'clock A.M. or after 8:00 o'clock P.M. of any
day, except Friday and Saturday on which days off -sale may
be made until 10:00 o'clock P.M. ' No off -sale shall be made
on New Year's Day, January 1; Independence Day, July 4;
Thanksgiving Day; or Christmas Day, December 25; but on the
evenings preceding such days, if the sale of liquor is not
otherwise prohibited on such evenings, off -sales may be made
until 10:00 o'clock P.M. No sale of liquor shall be made
after 8:00 o'clock P.M. on December 24.
Section 6. Eagan City Code Sec. 5.71 is hereby amended, to
SEC. 5.71. HOURS AND DAYS OF SALES BY ON -SALE WINE
LICENSEES. No on -sale of wine shall be made between 1:00
o'clock A.M. and 10:00 o'clock A.M. on Sunday, nor between
12:00 o'clock midnight and 8:00 o'clock A.M. on Monday, nor
between the hours of 1:00 o'clock A.M. and 8:00 o'clock A.M.
on Tuesday through Saturday, nor between the hours of 8:00
o'clock P.M. on December 24 and 8:00 o'clock A.M. on
December 25. Provided, however, that the sale of wine shall
be made between the hours of 10:00 o'clock A.M. and 12:00
o'clock midnight on Sunday only if the licensee
establishment is in conformance with the Minnesota Clean
Indoor Air Act.
-2-
g1
Section 7. Eagan City Code Sec. 5.52 entitled "Liquor
License Restrictions and Regulations" is hereby amended by adding
a Subdivision, to read:
Subd. 15. Coin-operated amusement devices may not
be located on premises licensed for off -sale of liquor.
Section 8. Eagan City Code Chapter 1 entitled "General
Provisions and Definitions Applicable to the Entire City Code
Including Penalty for Violation" and Section 5.99 entitled
"Violation a Misdemeanor" are hereby adopted in their entirety,
by reference, as though repeated verbatim herein.
Section 8. Effective Date. This ordinance shall take
effect upon its adoption and publication according to law.
ATTEST: CITY OF EAGAN
CITY COUNCIL
By:
Its Clerk Its Mayor
Date Ordinance Adopted:
Date Ordinance Published:
Agenda Information Memo
August 16, 1988, City Council Meeting
CONSIDERATION OF WESCOTT HILLS FEDERAL TAX CREDIT
C. Consideration of Comment Regarding Wescott Hills Federal Tax
Credit --The City has received a request from the Dakota County
HRA for a comment concerning an application by JA Development for
federal income tax credits for low income housing, a program
administered by Dakota County. The credits are a part of the tax
act of 1986 and is intended to support and encourage the
continuation of low income housing opportunities.
The application pertains to properties under construction by JA
Development located in Wescott Hills Revised 3rd Addition, Lots
1:1 - 14, as shown on th map enclosed on page Q. Also
enclosed on pages q[. c1 5 are two memos from Administrative
Assistant Hohenstein outlining the request and improvements JA
Development has accomplished in the project which are to be
supported by the credit.
If the City Council chooses to make positive comment to the
Dakota County HRA regarding this application, staff would
recommend consideration of certain objective criteria to be
applied to this and future requests for such credits. A draft of
six criteria is included in the enclosed memorandum.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: 1. To approve or deny
criteria for consideration of applications for federal low income
housing tax credits and 2) to make positive comment, no comment
or negative comment to the Dakota County HRA regarding JA
Development's application for low income housing tax credits.
B9
J
-J
CC
i
L:sasseetttiis:t:A::LtYR
s•s:siss ttRL•-:ABA^'
kk-eke_kthtkkk
V CF e¢Ecb
422:t23881::2z:VZO=4a112Sattall
!:1:its•sist•:iz8F28 = .... ZS'.
VVIR usi/t..: mum;
Pie:888itinu:::78iEEEEE::Ei
.Rtstt•_:i02kk.otthttktktikc:t:
G:c:•_::.:B:t:AR:istsztttussa:, s
is:_LisSt::S::ett:s::t:sgsram
54::t::0test•::zs=.t is':
rkttttitkt:Rtsakittii:tik:c.
ievo tRt::st=zi4t0::xst:tit'4
Qaecataoaa 5=55E55
1 SHEETS
t.
M1
A
MEMO TO: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES
FROM: ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT HOHENSTEIN
DATE: JULY 19, 1988
SUBJECT: WESCOTT HILLS FEDERAL TAX CREDITS
As I indicated in our conversation regarding this matter, it
appears that the original discussion of this matter was not as
clear as it might have been. In particular, the tax relief being
requested by the developer is a federal income tax credit
available as a means of alleviating tax act impacts on low and
moderate income housing projects. In addition, the Dakota
County HRA staff would oversee the maintenance and enforcement of
any agreement struck to provide this credit. Therefore, the
financial and staff impact on the City as a result of this
request would be practically nonexistent.
Essentially the developer has suggested that the receipt of tax
credits could be tied to the provision of additional green
space/open space within the project, improved quality materials
in phases of the project to which the credits would apply and an
improved/coordinated management system that would reduce public
safety demands resulting from the project.
J.A. Development has indicated that it would like to discuss
possible assistance in the development of the open space namely
in the areas of design and improvements. In a brief discussion
with Park staff, it was determined that priorities for that park
service district could be reviewed, but that the logical
alternative would be for the management company to pay any costs
of development of recreational structures with possible design
assistance from City staff.
Currently a meeting is scheduled for Wednesday, July 27, 1988, at
10:00 a.m. At this meeting the specific desires of the developer
as well as the City's concerns may be discussed. I will be
coordinating attendance at that meeting. If you have any
questions, please let me know.
Admilnistr
JDH/j eh
ive Assistant
MEMO TO: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES
FROM: ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT HOHENSTEIN
DATE: AUGUST 11, 1988
SUBJECT: WESCOTT HILLS FEDERAL TAX CREDIT REQUEST
Issue
Attached please find a copy of a letter originally posted to the City by the
Dakota County Housing and Redevelopment Authority in February concerning a
request by the owners of Wescott Hills 3rd Addition, Lots 11-14, Block 1, for
federal low income housing tax credits. The credit is one of the few remaining
income tax benefits available to low income housing owners following federal
tax reform. It will not affect property taxes in any way nor will it affect the
City's ability to generate revenue. The credits are a federal program
administered by the County HRA and the local comment option is intended to
provide an opportunity for cities to review applications and be certain the
credits are being used to support projects consistent with local land use
planning and social goals.
That
1.
2.
being the case, the City has three options:
Comment in support of the federal credit or the project
conditions,
Make no comment in either support or opposition to credits
or
3. Officially offer a negative comment if the project is not
city goals.
Background
with or without
for the project,
consistent with
At the time this request originally came forward, there was some
misunderstanding that it was a property tax credit or a financial participation
program to which the City has been generally opposed. Therefore, the specific
issues of the project were not fully discussed. However, in discussions with
City staff, the owners of the project in question indicated an intent to respond
to City concerns about the general appearance and public safety problems at the
complex to help secure the credits.
Currently, JA Development, the owner of the phase in question, manages 70% of
the buildings in the Wescott Hills Development. In so doing, they have provided
a more effective reporting mechanism such that public safety officials are
better able to contact a responsible, on-site superintendent than was the case
before. Moreover, the combined management has reduced the incidence of major
public safety calls from last year.
In addition, JA Development has made certain improvements to the exterior design
which have improved the appearance of the current phase over previous phases and
it is their intention to continue the new design features in future phases. A
rendering of the new design is enclosed. In addition, due to the timing of this
matter before the Council, these units are substantially complete and may be
viewed at the pleasure of the Council.
WESCOTT HILLS
AUGUST 11, 1988
PAGE TWO
As a part of its plans for the future of this project, the applicant hopes to
acquire management or development rights of the remaining phases of the project
and to use such control to provide an open, recreational space on five interior
lots of the project. They believe that this will enhance the appearance and
quality of the project as well as draw activities from the street into the open
space to further improve the safety situation in the development. To effect
such an improvement, the developer may return to the Council to request a
density transfer to other undeveloped lots. Because of the uncertainty and
complexity of these issues, staff has indicated to the developer that these
issues are important for Council information but should not be a part of the
current request.
Analysis
Therefore, based upon the improved management and its reduction of major public
safety calls and the improved appearance of the current phase, the developer is
again requesting official comment from the City to the Dakota County HRA
regarding federal income tax credits for the four units currently being
completed. The County has indicated that it will probably provide an allocation
to the developer if the City chooses a positive comment option or a no comment
option. Only in the event of a negative City comment will the request likely be
denied. If the Council were to choose to comment in the affirmative, it is
staff's position that certain standard criteria of choice be implemented by
which to judge requests for such credits. Generally, these criteria should
support explicit development goals of the City. In this regard, staff is
recommending that the following criteria be considered:
Requests for Low Income Housing Tax Credit shall be considered by the City
of Eagan for eligible projects on the basis of their relationship to the
criteria which follow. The project may not be required to conform with all
criteria but is unlikely to receive endorsement if it compares unfavorably
to a majority of the criteria.
1. Low income housing tax credits may be used only for rehabilitation or
upgrade of existing projects or to enhance subsequent phases of
existing projects. (This criteria reserves the credit for improvements
in areas of identified problems rather than for new projects.)
2. Applicants for low income housing credits should demonstrate that the
credits will serve to reduce the density of multi -family developments.
(This criteria reenforces the Council direction to reduce density and
bring about down -zoning.)
3. Applicants' projects should exceed exterior finish requirements.
(This criteria supports the Council direction concerning finish
material and lends added impetus to the use of quality finish
materials.)
Q3
WESCOTT HILLS
AUGUST 11, 1988
PAGE THREE
4. Applicants' projects should exceed landscape requirements and/or open
space requirements. (Again, this criteria reenforces the reduction of
density and addition of amenities to subject projects.)
5. Low income housing credits may be used only for two to three bedroom
homes/units to provide low income housing opportunities for families.
(This criteria promotes the City policy of lower density, scattered
site, low income housing as multiple bedroom units are more
frequently present in lower density developments.)
6. No fewer/more than % of units occupied must be occupied by low and
moderate income persons/families. (In the past, the City has required
that no more than 20% of an eligible project's units be occupied by
low and moderate income persons as defined by a low/moderate criteria
for consideration for multi -family housing bonds. If this policy is
to be applied to low income credits, it may conflict with the
program's requirements. The low income housing credit allows the
applicant a choice between having at least 20% of the units occupied
by persons at 50% or less of median gross income or having at least
40% of the units occupied by persons at 60% or less of median gross
income. If a percentage requirement is applied as a criteria for low
income housing credits, the City will need to rationalize this
maximum/minimum issue.)
If you have any questions regarding this matter, please let me know.
A.finistrative Assistant
JDH/j eh
Attachment
9
DAKOTA COUNTY
iu
111
HRA
Serving People and Communities
February 15, 1988
Mr. Thomas L. Hedges, City Administrator
Eagan City Hall
3830 Pilot Knob Road
Eagan, MN 55122
Dear Mr. Hedges:
DAKOTA COUNTY
HOUSING &
REDEVELOPMENT
AUTHORITY
2496 - 145th STREET WEST
ROSEMOUNT, MINNESOTA 55068
612-423-4800
Enclosed is an application the Dakota County HRA received for an
allocation of Low Income Housing Tax Credits (LIHC). The
application is for a housing development in the City of Eagan
Westcott Hills, 4th Phase.
There are a few things still missing from the application.
However, assuming the missing items are received, we would be
taking this application to the Dakota County HRA Board for
consideration of an allocation of the LIHC at their March
meeting.
A part of the application process is allowing the City in which a
project is to be located an opportunity to comment on the project
or the use of LIHC on the project. The City has an option as to
whether or not they choose to comment. Any comments received
will be considered before allocating LIHC. I have also enclosed
a copy of our procedural manual for your information.
We would appreciate receiving any comments by March 1, 1988. If
we have not heard from the City by that date, we will assume you
do not wish to comment.
Please call Mark Ulfers or me with any questions.
Sincerely,
6f,eaae7(
Kari Erickson
Deputy Director
"AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER"
Agenda Information Memo
August 16, 1988, City Council Meeting
VARIANCE/SCOTT AND ANN STROMMEN
D. Variance for Scott and Ann Strommen to Allow a Ten Foot
Variance to the 30' Setback from a Public Right -of -Way --The
Planning Department has received an application from Scott and
Ann Strommen to allow a ten foot variance to a 30' setback from
the public right-of-way at 4036 Northview Terrace, Lot 11, Block
3, Lexington Parkview Addition.
For additional information on this item, ple se refer to the
Planning Department report enclosed on pages ok X through t(jcD.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny a
variance for Scott and Ann Strommen to allow a 10' variance to a
30' setback from the public right-of-way.
9�
CITY OF EAGAN
SUBJECT: VARIANCE
APPLICANT: SCOTT & ANN STROMMEN
LOCATION: 4036 NORTHVIEW TERRACE
LOT 11, BLOCK 3, LEXINGTON PARKVIEW
EXISTING ZONING: PD, R-1
(PLANNED DEVELOPMENT, SINGLE FAMILY)
DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: AUGUST 16, 1988
DATE OF REPORT: AUGUST 8, 1988
REPORTED BY: PLANNING DEPARTMENT
APPLICATION SUMMARY
An application has been submitted by Scott and Ann Strommen
requesting a 10 -foot variance to the minimum 30 -foot required
setback from public right-of-way.
COMMENTS
The purpose for the variance is to allow the Strommens to
construct a 1,533 -square -foot home on lot 11, block 3, Lexington
Parkview Addition. Being a corner lot, this 12,600 -square -foot
lot has 225 feet of frontage along Northview Terrace; therefore,
there is a 30' setback on two sides of the home. The house will
meet or exceed all other setback and lot coverage requirements
and will not encrouch any drainage and utility easements.
The applicants are pleased with the location and the original
house plans were drawn prior to knowing about the 30' setback on
the west side. Any new house plans drawn will cost the applicant
$400.00 and a delay in their building schedule.
If approved, this variance shall be subject to all applicable
code requirements.
1/4 SEC.23,
020-11
10.45'011 11110
••1.'\Iv' L.24
15544.4014114
1
Ole -2b
010-00
13030
•
•
!
•1
7:0
IA DRIVE
0
00 1
c-)
b
c
IIz
CITY Of 1AGAN
011 - Ot
113.94
OUTLOT A
'v 12 TERRACE i 9 It
372 30
127 /4 Ha 31 93 _ 93 11011 j10 Z9
]:y• 171.93" 311 192 N 190.11 I511.44
'1s •� N9ri 31'1. 133111.21
.J�/11;J J. Jai
b:p• 0 is
011-14
Vo"'
Agenda Information Memo
August 16, 1988, City Council Meeting
SPECIAL PERMIT EXTENSION/EAGAN CHRISTIAN CENTER
E. Special Permit for Eagan Christian Center to Allow a Two Year
Extension of the Special Permit to Allow a Church Facility in an
I•-1 District, Cedar Industrial Park RLS --The Planning Department
has received an application from the Eagan Christian Center
requesting a two year extension of its special permit to allow
church activities in an I-1 limited industrial district located
at Tract F of Cedar Industrial Park RLS.
For additional information on this item, please refer t the
Planning Department report which is enclosed on pages jtu P(k.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny a two
year special permit extension for the Eagan Christian Center to
allow a church facility in a limited industrial district.
D1
CITY OF EAGAN
SUBJECT: SPECIAL PERMIT
APPLICANT: EAGAN CHRISTIAN CENTER
LOCATION: CEDAR INDUSTRIAL PARK R.L.S.
PART OF TRACT F
EXISTING ZONING: I -1 -LIMITED INDUSTRIAL
DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: AUGUST 16, 1988
DATE OF REPORT: AUGUST 5, 1988
REPORTED BY: PLANNING DEPARTMENT
APPLICATION SUMMARY
An application has been submitted by Pastor Jay Zinn requesting a
two-year extension of their recently expired permit. The
original permit was applied for in July of 1986 and gained
approval at the August 19, 1986 City Council meeting. The permit
allowed the Eagan Christian Center to hold meetings Sunday
mornings and Thursday evenings in a Limited Industrial district.
It is not the intention of the applicant to make this their
permanent location. The church, during the two-year time period,
will eventually purchase their own property and build a meeting
facility. All prior conditions and Code requirements have been
met.
If approved, this Special Permit shall be subject to the
following conditions:
1. This temporary special permit shall expire two years after
approval.
2. The permit shall be subject to all Code requirements.
io
•
112
--I
n8
`
.41\ ,r,, SGL
EAGAN CHRISTIAN CENTER
wimp
l �3
AcAD .Tof 1a
5 IA Oli)/4'�
Se 4 00 1., (ao irr)
LA 10,4 y
SC tf 0L'?,
Neo,' 1
S t�FtJt?i.K
ToDO R
JUuSEA
X49 r- INV
/0LARSEV j
FRoNr EN pearvC E
lJS
Eagan Management Services, Inc.
1771 Yankee Doodle Road
Eagan, Minnesota 55121
(612) 454-9006
July 19, 1988
City of Eagan/Zoning Board
3830 Pilot Knob Road
P.O. Box 21199
Eagan, Mn. 55121
Dear Sirs,
I currently function as Property Manager of the Shawnee
Business Center, in which Eagan Christian Center are tenants.
Having Eagan Christian Center as a tenant is definately
an asset to the project. Their use of the space, hours
of operation, etc., in no way affects the other occupants
of the project. We are anxious to keep Eagan Christian
Center as tenants for as long as possible.
If you have any questions, or if I can help in any
other way, please contact me at 454-9006.
Sincerely,
Kimberly Rogers
Property Manager
� o�
Agenda Information Memo
August 16, 1988, City Council Meeting
WAIVER OF PLAT/LOT 6, BLOCK 1, CINNAMON RIDGE 6TH ADDITION
F. Waiver of Plat for Zachman Brothers Construction Company to
Allow a Duplex Lot Split on Lot 6, Block 1, Cinnamon Ridge 6th
Addition --An application for waiver of plat has been received by
the Planning Department from Zachman Brother Construction
Company, Inc., for a duplex lot split to allow individual
ownership on Lot 6, Block 1 of Cinnamon Ridge 6th Addition.
For a copy of the Planning Department report regarding this
matter, refer to pages k0011 through fC
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the
waiver of plat for Lot 6, Block 1 of Cinnamon Ridge 6th Addition
as presented.
log
CITY OF EAGAN
SUBJECT: WAIVER OF PLAT
APPLICANT: ZACHMAN BROTHERS CONSTRUCTION CO, INC
LOCATION: LOT 6, BLOCK 1
CINNAMON RIDGE 6TH ADDITION
EXISTING ZONING: PD (PLANNED DEVELOPMENT)
DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: AUGUST 16, 1988
DATE OF REPORT: AUGUST 1, 1988
REPORTED BY: PLANNING DEPARTMENT
APPLICATION SUMMARY
An application has been submitted by Zachman Brothers
Construction Company, Inc. requesting a Waiver of Plat for lot 6,
block 1, Cinnamon Ridge 6th Addition. The purpose for the Waiver
is to allow individual ownership. The duplex has separate
utilities and meets or exceeds all setback requirements.
If approved, this Waiver shall be subject to all applicable code
requirements.
W\05T )wL7( Co21UE2 F
SAICI L,o i !o .
/15.93
0
0
p9
YY1b`ii 5WL1( Co2NEQ vF
SAIo DoT z .
Sou i i4 -.ASI -E2 LY
SA -10 Lv-( (o .
12.0
0
H�L=2212
fJ01L714 LINE a SAiD LoT to.
/
0
13
N
UNE aF a: 'fin 5$ I
32.00
0
CJ
That
to th
North
said
corne
.Lot 6
corne
Agenda Information Memo
August 16, 1988, City Council Meeting
PRELIMINARY PLAT/REPLAT
CEDAR CLIFF COMMERCIAL PARK 5TH ADDITION
G. Preliminary Plat to Replat Cedar Cliff Commercial Park 5th
Addition Consisting of Two Neighborhood Business Lots --A public
hearing was held by the Advisory Planning Commission at its last
regular meeting held on July 26, 1988 to consider a preliminary
plat/replat of Cedar Cliff Commercial Park 5th Addition as
requested by Federal Land Company. The replat modifies the
boundaries of the current two lots contained within the
subdivision increasing the size of Lot 1 and decreasing the size
of Lot 2. The Advisory Planning Commission is recommending
approval of this replat.
For a copy of the Planning and Engineering Department reports on
this matter, please refer to pages It:1. through JfY
For a copy of the APC action on this item, refer to pages/10-2.-
ACTION
ages/O-.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the
preliminary plat/replat of Cedar Cliff Commercial Park 5th
Addition as presented.
\k
CITY OF EAGAN
SUBJECT: PRELIMINARY PLAT (REPLAT)
CEDAR CLIFF COMMERCIAL PARK 5TH ADDITION
APPLICANT: FEDERAL LAND COMPANY
LOCATION: SE 1/4 OF SECTION 30
EXISTING ZONING: PD (PLANNED DEVELOPMENT)
DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: JULY 26, 1988
DATE OF REPORT: JULY 18, 1988
REPORTED BY: PLANNING AND ENGINEERING DEPARTMENTS
APPLICATION SUMMARY
An application has been submitted requesting a Preliminary Plat
(Replat) consisting of two lots along the north side of Cliff
Road at the Cedar Cliff shopping center. This Preliminary Plat
will add 45' to the west property line of the Dakota County State
Bank. Although a Waiver of Plat would have achieved the same
result, platting was a necessity for the bank's financing
requirements. Since this replat incorporates a portion of the
shopping center's drive aisle, a cross easement should be
provided with the Final Plat submission. Lot 1 will contain 4.16
acres and lot 2 will be increased to .53 acre.
CEDAR CLIFF - 5TH ADDITION
ASSESSMENTS: The parcels proposed for replatting were properly
assessed for all utilities and streets at the time of the
original platting except for the upgrading of Cliff Road and
lateral benefit from storm sewer trunk.
There are no pending assessments of record and the following
assessments are proposed in accordance with City Special
Assessment Policy 82-1:
PROJ # DESCRIPTION RATE QUANTITY AMOUNT
186 Lateral benefit
trunk storm sewer 30.88/ff 627 $19,362
Future Cliff Road Upgrade 111.70/ff 432.19 $48,276
TOTAL PROPOSED ASSESSMENT $67,638
All final assessment obligations will be calculated based on the
quantities and dimensions of the final plat and in accordance
with the rates in effect at the time of final plat approval.
CONDITIONS: CEDAR CLIFF COMMERCIAL PARK 5TH ADDITION
1. These standard conditions of plat approval as adopted by
Council action on September 15, 1987 shall be complied with:
Al, Bl, B3, Jel, F1, and Gl.
2. A cross easement shall be provided along the western property
line of lot 2.
�l3
STANDARD CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL
A. Assessments
1. This development shall accept its additional assessment
obligations as defined in the staff's report in
accordance with the final plat dimensions and the rates
in effect at the time of final plat approval.
B. Easements and Rights -of -Way
1. This development shall dedicate 10' drainage and utility
easements centered over all common lot lines and adjacent
to private property or public right-of-way.
2. This development shall dedicate, provide, or financially
guarantee its proportionate share of the acquisition
costs of additional drainage, ponding, and utility
easements as required by the alignment, depth, and
storage capacity of all required public utilities and
streets located beyond the boundaries of this plat or
outside of dedicated public right-of-way as necessary to
service this development.
3. This development shall dedicate all public right-of-way
and temporary slope easements for ultimate development of
adjacent roadways as required by the appropriate
jurisdictional agency.
4. This development shall dedicate adequate drainage and
ponding easements to incorporate the required high water
elevation necessitated by City storm water storage volume
requirements.
C. Plans and Specifications
1. All public streets and utilities necessary to provide
service to this development shall be designed by a
registered professional engineer in accordance with City
codes and engineering standards and policies, and
approved by staff prior to final plat approval.
2. A detailed grading, drainage, erosion, and sediment
control plan must be prepared in accordance with current
City standards and approved by staff prior to final plat
approval.
3. This development shall insure that all temporary dead end
public streets shall have a cul-de-sac constructed in
accordance with City engineering standards.
4. A detailed landscape plan shall be submitted on the
proposed grading plan and approved by staff prior to the
final plat approval. The financial guarantee shall be
included in the Development Contract and not released
until one year after the date of installation.
STANDARD CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL
PAGE TWO
5. All internal public and private streets shall be
constructed within the required right-of-way in
accordance with City design standards.
D. Public Improvements
1. If any public improvements are to be installed under a
City contract, the appropriate project must be approved
by Council action prior to final plat approval.
E. Permits
1. This development shall be responsible for the acquisition
of all regulatory agency permits in the time frame
required by the affected agency.
F. Parks Dedication
1. This development shall fulfull its parks dedication
requirements as recommended by the Advisory Parks and
Recreation Commission and approved by Council action.
G. Other
1. All standard platting and zoning conditions shall be
adhered to unless specifically granted a variance by
Council action.
Advisory Planning Commission City Council
Approved: August 25, 1987 September 15, 1987
Revised:
LTS*2
STANDARD
4
Preliminary plat
ADDITION
LY_
LL
COMMERCIAL PARK
0
U
s
3
sy
as
Y V
1 8
3 "
y5•o�o . ._i __ 4�
/Th
of
I I -� /cc
/..‘o, 9/.0 N
J
6-y On/ Vf NV/H
0VOr'
01 y�1.v1s wltvfO•2
_7c' / /V
FL - tl '<L l 'Or ""S ',7c ti'./ N•M
%1 BOERHAVE LAND SURVE
Ec o
t0 -
Q
0
COMMERCIAL
al
!hi
II
4��1
C
11.1
•
1
I
F
of
. 9
r
¢i
2i.
3
t
I
e ..h w
:l Lt
I9
COMMERCIAL
ADDITION
M0t,MAt
t
•:c
1L
N
dVW
L 'ON Mp ADAM--
AVM d: 11-1`318
s_��,:,tN
�tVO
UvoL'
O`.() Alrtru V10.
a n. •Ia d -a roa an .0•0 ll
J
J
�� CLIFF ROAD UPGRADE - 432.19 F.F.
CL
COMMERCIAL
I1
13
•
.5
LL. i tag
x.
J x :11
U :I1
i!3
in x jai
.
W , :Ali
1
CC
Q
W—
3
5
xs
5E
aF
1'`
4
IA
o.
Sg
COMMERCIAL
ADDITION
01
I 4
Mf4,M.0•
001M
0
cl
cIVV4 AVM J3 1H�;U I
QVO s �r,:,rr•�
UVOH A1N(lOD ViONVU
i
1
1
LATERAL BENEFIT STORM SEWER TRUNK - 627 F
.. . -,-
,.
P:-.2 1
.;,-,',..,,-"-",-,-; • -893. I"
".".= (.;•.--,..4.:
'.
7-- •/ ---.---%
M 0 1 . U.3
.j .----•-t-.. \ \ 1 A
F / =-1 \ \•.\
C.4 A - p p
, . io. .. • ,
- i ' \ —
c-\--- )
.' I [Ii : i I II
LI : ---4 I ! ! , :
• ‘ 'r---. '' /i
,/ \s‘ ss•
.2s. •
V.
' A
217
--7-
/ MARI
1AP- 9'
892.3
898.8
'''.,N..\_)
. I • . o, >
AP -26 ! .....,,z.'
883.5 I c..)'-"
;
886.6
AP= 4S.
881.7
889.0
‘5°
AP -10 i, \\ \ ! .-L"-•
9 I 9.7.. \ \ *.s.s. \• \ It =7
. 925. 6 ••......„,\N\ \N \\‘ \\\,:,',\ \ ../..._.,:t If --,77:
, s : • ' —,-2.1,
r.. ----i--
\\
. . ,... ,
L.S.- I j; ,, ., 1 r, :
; , • ..
AP -50
/
886.0
894.0
...,..
.:1-="ZT ,i I :
7-11.- •
CV ti I i 1 L---
0,;
cr . --.
•
b i 1
:Ce--Z-FET,-.
A -1.w --7— ' , i ; • ;
____ • •
I—' 0 °------916 .
......19. - i ,•,,,. . • r'AN29
,z) -
-ft rn • . - .
Q(
SUBJECT PARCEL
FIG # I
city of eagan
PUBLIC
WORKS
DEPARTMENT,
STORM SEWER
MASTER PLAN
approved:
standard
plate It :
Page 13/PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES
July 26, 1988
All voted in favor.
WAIVER OF PLAT - CLIFF ROAD PROPERTIES
Chairman Pawlenty opened the next public hearing regarding the
application for a waiver of plat in order to combine a portion of
Outlot B, Cliff Lake Centre Addition, with a parcel (011-76) to the
west located along the west side of proposed Cliff Lake Road in the
southwest quarter of Section 29 and the southeast quarter of Section
30.
Assistant City Planner Sturm informed the Commission an
application had been submitted requesting a waiver of plat in order
to allow the conveyance of a lana transaction. The site is located
along the west side of proposed Cliff Lake Drive, north of Cliff
Road. A 0.3 acre piece would be transferred along with a portion of
vacated Rahn Road to the 20 acre agriculturally -zoned parcel ownea by
Federal Land Company. In exchange, Federal Lana Company would grant a
roadway easement for the Cliff Lake Drive construction. Deaicatea
right-of-way would be requirea when the Federal Land parcel develops.
The developer was not present at the meeting and there were no
public comments.
Mr. Voracek asked what a Comprehensive Plan District was on the
0.3 acre piece. Mr. Sturm statea it was PD/CSC-10. Mr. Voracek askew
if it was zoned D-4. Mr. Sturm statea it was zonea R-3. Mr. Voracek
stated that the two parcels are compatible. And as long as they are
compatible, he has no problem with the waiver of plat.
Voracek moved, Graves seconded, the motion to close the public
hearing and approve the waiver of plat for Cliff Road Properties in
order to combine a portion of Outlot B, Cliff Lake Centre Addition,
with a parcel (011-76) to the west located along the west side of
proposed Cliff Lake Road in the southwest quarter of Section 29 and
the southeast quarter of Section 30, subject to the following
conaitions:
1. When Parcel 011-76 develops, the owner shall dedicate
right-of-way for Cliff Lake Drive.
2. The 0.3 acre triangular piece created along with the vacated
portion of Rahn Road shall be combined with Parcel 011-76.
All voted in favor.
CEDAR CLIFF COMMERCIAL PARK 5TH ADDITION - FEDERAL LAND COMPANY
Chairman Pawlenty convened the next public hearing regarding an
application for a preliminary plat (re -plat) of 4.69 acres ana two
dad
Page 14/PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES
July 26, 1988
lots zoned neighborhood business within the Cedar Cliff Commercial
Planned Development located at the northeast intersection ot Clifr
ana Nicols Roads in the southeast quarter of Section 30.
Assistant City Planner Jim Sturm statea an application had been
received requesting a preliminary plat (re -plat) consisting of two
lots along the north side ot Clitf Road at the Cedar Clitf Shopping
Center. The preliminary plat would add 45 feet to tne west property
line of the Dakota County State Bank. The platting was a necessity
tor the bank's financing requirements. Because the re -plat would
incorporate a portion of the shopping center's drive isle, a
cross -easement would be provided with the final plat submission. Lot
1 would contained 4.16 acres ana Lot 2 would be increased to 0.53
acres.
Mark Collin, Federal Lana Company, (developer), statea if their
application was approved, it would clear the title. Mr. Collin statea
he was concerned regarding the two proposed assessments for the trunk
storm sewer and the Cliff Road upgrade. He questioned the necessity
for the improvements. Mike Foertsch stated the lana would benefit
frcm the presence of Cliff Road.
Chairman Pawlenty asked if anything could be done by the
Commission regarding the assessment concern. Mr. Garry asked if
Federal Lana Company was being assessed merely because they were
before the Commission. Mr. Foertsch statea the Council has directed
staff to update the assessments for anytning that goes through the
system. He stated this property had never paid anything tor Clitf
Road. Member Trygg questioned if they had not appeared betore tne
Commission if they would have been -assessed. Mr. Foertscn stated no
unless the City did a comprehensive assessment of all property.
There was no public comment.
Mr. Merkley stated he felt there was a need for a legal
clarification on the assessment matter. He asked it it was legal to
assess for future improvements. Mr. Sheldon stated supplemental
assessments are permitted. He stated it may be more in the nature of
a connection charge.
Wilkins moved, Trygg seconded, the motion to close the public
hearing and approve a preliminary plat (re -plat) of 4.69 acres ana
two lots zoned neighborhood business within the Cedar Cliff
Commercial Park Planned Development located at the northeast
intersection of Cliff and Nicols Roads in the southeast quarter of
Section 30, subject to the following conditions:
1. The standard conditions of plat approval as adopted by
Council action on September 15, 1987, shall be complied with: A-1,
B --i, B-3, E-1, F-1, and G-1.
Page 15/PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES
July 26, 1988
2. A cross -easement shall be provided along the western property
line of Lot 2.
All voted in favor.
HIGHVIEW PARR ADDITION - MILDRED S. HANSON
Chairman Pawlenty opened the next public hearing regarding a
proposal for a preliminary plat consisting of three lots on 2.27 R-1
(single family) acres located south of Highview Avenue and west or
Pilot Knob Road in the southeast quarter of Section 4.
Mr. Sturm stated an application has been submitted requesting a
preliminary plat for the Highview Park Addition consisting of tnree
single family lots on 2.27 previously zoned R-1 acres located along
the south side of Highview Avenue just west of Pilot Knob Road. He
stated Lot 7 originally was approved as a single home site. Other
lots in the area had been split one time; all are at least 100 feet
wide. The lots, as proposed, meet the R-1 requirements of 12,000
square feet and are 85 feet wide at the 30' setback line. However, if
a line were drawn between the existing home on Lot 7 and the home on
Lot 6, the lots are only in the 80 foot to 85 foot width area. The
major concern is keeping the large lot integrity of the original
Highview Acres Addition. When the Highview Avenue was approved in the
early 1980s, one utility service was provided in anticipation of one
split to the lot.
The developer did not comment at the meeting.
Jim Nickle, 1426 Highview, stated he had discussions with 18
neighboring residents and they have serious reservations regarding
the proposal. He stated two new lots would be smaller than the other
lots in the area. They would prefer one lot only divided out. Mr.
Nickle submitted a petition to the Commission signed by 18 of the 21
landowners.
William Scarre, 1430 Highview, expressed concern as to the size
of the lot. He stated the proposal may have changed since he recelvea
his notice.
Mr. Graves asked how many other lots had been split. Mr. Sturm
explained and diagramed how the adjoining lots were previously split.
Mr. Graves stated he would prefer not splitting the lots
differently from the rest of the neighborhood. Mr. Merkley stated he
favors only one split. He questioned if the minimum size is met,
could the Commission prevent the split.
City Attorney Jim Sheldon stated that in the Swanson case, the
trial court upheld a factually similar case. Mr. Sheldon stated the
I az
Agenda Information Memo
August 16, 1988, City Council Meeting
PRELIMINARY PLAT/HIGHVIEW PARK ADDITION
H. Preliminary Plat for Highview Park Addition/Mildred S.
Hanson, Consisting of Three Lots on 2.27 Acres Zoned R-1 (Single
Family) --At its last regular meeting on July 26, 1988, the
Advisory Planning Commission held a public hearing to consider a
preliminary plat for Highview Park Addition/Mildred S. Hanson
consisting of three lots on 2.27 R-1 single family acres. The
APC is recommending denial of this application.
For a copy of the Planning and Xngineering Department report,
refer to pages 107 through !
For a copy of the APC action on this item, refer to pages/3?-///
The Advisory Parks and Recreation Commission is recommending a
cash dedication and trailway requirement if this application is
approved.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the
preliminary plat entitled Highview Park Addition as presented.
CITY OF EAGAN
SUBJECT: PRELIMINARY PLAT (HIGHVIEW PARK ADDITION)
APPLICANT: MILDRED S HANSON
LOCATION: LOT 7, BLOCK 1, HIGHVIEW ACRES
EXISTING ZONING: R-1 (SINGLE-FAMILY)
DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: JULY 26, 1988
DATE OF REPORT: JULY 18, 1988
REPORTED BY: PLANNING AND ENGINEERING DEPARTMENTS
APPLICATION SUMMARY
An application has been submitted requesting a Preliminary Plat
for the Highview Park Addition consisting of three single-family
lots on 2.27 previously -zoned R-1 acres located along the south
side of Highview Avenue just west of Pilot Knob Road.
Lot 7 originally was approved as a single -home site. Other lots
in the area have been split one time; all are at least 100' wide.
The lots as proposed meet the R-1 requirements of 12,000 sq. ft.
and are 85' wide at the 30' setback line; however, if a line is
drawn between the existing home on lot 7 and the home on lot 6,
the lots are only in the 80'-85' width area. The major concern
is keeping the large lot integrity of the original Highview Acres
Addition. When Highview Avenue was improved in the early 1980's,
one utility service was provided in anticipation of one split to
the lot.
These lots measure 23,200 sq. ft., 23,700 sq. ft., and 53,280 sq.
ft. The 23,000 sq ft. lots must connect to city utilities with
the building construction. The other lot is above the one -acre
R-1 minimum ,lot size for mandatory sewer and water use. That
home meets all code setback requirements.
GRADING/DRAINAGE/EROSION CONTROL: No preliminary grading plan
was submitted for staff eview as a part of this application.
The existing contour of the land shows landlocked low areas along
the east line of Lot 1 and in the area common to Lots 1 and 2 and
northerly of the proposed building pad areas. Storm sewer is
required to drain these potential drainage problem areas.
Home building erosion control measures will be applicable on this
site. This will entail the use of silt fence down slope from
disturbed areas and the use of rock construction entrances to
minimize mud tracking onto the existing streets. These measures
should be installed as a first step in construction because of
the project's close proximity to existing homes and storm sewer
lines.
UTILITIES: Water main service and sanitary sewer service are
readily available to serve this site along Highview Avenue. The
development will be required to provide water and sanitary sewer
service to each platted parcel.
STREETS/ACCESS/CIRCULATION: Public street access to this site is
readily available along the northerly adjacent Highview Avenue.
The driveways for the new home construction will connect to
Highview Avenue which has a nonsurmountable type of curb and
gutter. The home builder will have to remove the existing curb
and gutter and replace with a drop type curb through the driveway
section. Since front yard areas are lower than the existing
street grades, the driveway should be constructed with a high
point in the boulevard area to prevent the street runoff from
flowing over the curb and having adverse impacts to the existing
homes.
EASEMENTS/RIGHTS-OF-WAY/PERMITS: Sufficient right-of-way for
Highview Avenue was dedicated with the platting of Highview
Acres.
A storm sewer line easement will be required along the common lot
lines between -Lots 1 and 2 for the proposed storm sewer
construction.
No unusual permit requirements are anticipated beyond the normal
City requirements for excavation in public right-of-way and the
appropriate sewer and water hook-up permits.
ASSESSMENTS: A search of City records show no pending
assessments of record and the following assessments are proposed
as a condition of final plat approval in accordance with special
assessment policy 82-1:
i,s
PROJ # DESCRIPTION RATE QTY AMT
49 Sanitary Sewer Lateral $15.85/ff 140 $2,219
14 Water Lateral 13.10/ff 140 1,834
Storm Sewer Trunk .056/sf 98,881 5,537
49 Sanitary Sewer Trunk 655/lot 2 lots 1,310
14 Water Trunk 630/lot 1 lot 630
TOTAL PROPOSED ASSESSMENT $11,530
All final assessment obligations will be calculated based on the
quantities and dimensions of the final plat and in accordance
with the rates in effect at the time of final plat approval.
HIGHVIEW ACRES CONDITIONS:
1. These standard conditions of plat approval as adopted by
Council action on September 15, 1987 shall be complied with:
Al, Bl, B2, Cl, C2, C4, D1, El, F1, and Gl.
2. The building setback shall be on an imaginary line between
the existing homes on lots 6 and 7.
3. No setback Variances shall be allowed for newly -created home
sites (lots 1 and 2).
4. Lots 1 and 2 shall connect to city utilities.
5. Development is required to provide a storm sewer outlet to the
existing low areas in the areas of 1 and 2.
STANDARD CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL
A. Assessments
1. This development shall accept its additional assessment
obligations as defined in the staff's report in
accordance with the final plat dimensions and the rates
in effect at the time of final plat approval.
B. Easements and Rights -of -Way
1. This development shall dedicate 10' drainage and utility
easements centered over all common lot lines and adjacent
to private property or public right-of-way.
2. This development shall dedicate, provide, or financially
guarantee its proportionate share of the acquisition
costs of additional drainage, ponding, and utility
easements as required by the alignment, depth, and
storage capacity of all required public utilities and
streets located beyond the boundaries of this plat or
outside of dedicated public right-of-way as necessary to
service this development.
3. This development shall dedicate all public right-of-way
and temporary slope easements for ultimate development of
adjacent roadways as required by the appropriate
jurisdictional agency.
4. This development shall dedicate adequate drainage and
ponding easements to incorporate the required high water
elevation necessitated by City storm water storage volume
requirements.
C. Plans and Specifications
1. All public streets and utilities necessary to provide
service to this development shall be designed by a
registered professional engineer in accordance with City
codes and engineering standards and policies, and
approved by staff prior to final plat approval.
2. A detailed grading, drainage, erosion, and sediment
control plan must be prepared in accordance with current
City standards and approved by staff prior to final plat
approval.
3. This development shall insure that all temporary dead end
public streets shall have a cul-de-sac constructed in
accordance with City engineering standards.
4. A detailed landscape plan shall be submitted on the
proposed grading plan and approved by staff prior to the
final plat approval. The financial guarantee shall be
included in the Development Contract and not released
until one year after the date of installation.
a 9
STANDARD CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL
PAGE TWO
5. All internal public and private streets shall be
constructed within the required right-of-way in
accordance with City design standards.
D. Public Improvements
1. If any public improvements are to be installed under a
City contract, the appropriate project must be approved
by Council action prior to final plat approval.
E. Permits
1. This development shall be responsible for the acquisition
of all regulatory agency permits in the time frame
required by the affected agency.
F. Parks Dedication
1. This development shall fulfull its parks dedication
requirements as recommended by the Advisory Parks and
Recreation Commission and approved by Council action.
G. Other
1. All standard platting and zoning conditions shall be
adhered to unless specifically granted a variance by
Council action.
Advisory Planning Commission City Council
Approved: August 25, 1987 September 15, 1987
Revised:
LTS#2
STANDARD
MENDOTA
�P'CONOONATE
t.; IICON�PTE
J
CENTER CURVE
+�W
✓SEN NJ ff---7-E"35"F-47"
!3Y /r�Try
Re . 2e) `J
(, ,,,r• , l' .:.,. I
, sti U
d_
J 1 I
,I;
1/1
'
•
/
: ���
I
-711
LOST SPU Arywn,os, f�F
-E III
COt)11T7Y I
GOLF
J2 J .p11
,-, I • IRE
FPL[
4;rf r ,.
C1,63. tEHHDEP 1 ! IA°ice ' ! •I '�«
' ik''r•d'•% ��• I r:l 1.41 • , l'i-l'';
.,rr.1.7:-;-:'...'1..,..j';':;:::::,1::;::::••••::::.'1;;
x...!i,lli:i ill :rGh7lllll
C►
7, R23
0o i; ]f
343-00
332 -30
j7 sr
-GO
, -! 16- C"
2 -00
ti E
� O - 0 1
3,0
253-00
051-00 52-7 C.
f
-",•t
J
4-
091 -60
092-3:;
I},'0
Clty of Eagan
020-75
PARK
City Ea.7in
030-7F
•
1s.
ROA) .;MT
1
''82-00 Jdi- 0
a I •
fi
HIGHVIEW
City of EESan
094 -00
090-30
•
093-00
,��Ic I
• +- I i
ROAD
4'040
7
4
0
5
4
232 31.K • '0018 TtNOSS3.ONe 3a1N30 NM41
Slf3NNV1d ! S2i33NtnN3 / saaGnNf1S
�NI''O3 JNU.3A1:1°S ONV 1-fMl��
OCz, en 1•w •M
i r uie.c
•.1.11.«.ft r •umm w, n .•n
•, w.. ••w::'.7eau.:
11.7 • . I ..., 7,•
Nollloov Havel M31/1HVIH
:Liao rvv 7d -to>,ellryo, rvolsoti3
OI y 10V'tiV C'30VN1Yelr
1Ai.1-11Lr) ' lV d Asrvr./ "3ttd
w
ti
O
z
LEGAL DE
20Z 31.5 • DC 1b*/PSS31tY41 3.11N3J NNO.1
SK3NNV1d / Sb33NION3 / S80.13A6f1S
'3N1'.03 01+11.1.3Ai111S ONV1-18177
C[fq.• 1•y •••••t f /•I••p
••1••••••w f• •1•11 11,11 -•1
41
„
w•M H Y..1 = uub
ny
(Iwf • 11• On• la•,.•
fVOIlIQOv )1dV'd M31/\HJIH
:2ioj red -id -.o.4tJ.r e' nolSoty3
Or y g 'rw1OO•tr9 f •.IVHNI.ovyc
'.u.lvtn ' 19' -rd A rlwrisw"3 'd
0
O
01
l
a
J
a
•
00
—
/
4
SITE DATA
iai .11
�� yy
555
a33
T
SANITARY SEWER LATERAL -
1
20Z 31x6 • 40 -ii 1VVC•SS3i01i/ 311N3j NNp1
S!l3NN0'1d / Si133N19N3 / SLIW3ALN1S
ONI''OO ONU,3At1S ONV1-18.1.7
11
'fro" vol 4•■ ..
r 1np••♦
••A. 1• Owe 1.11. .11
••1 slow ••••••••• .r r.+• n1. 1.1
Slop 1 Ie. r+
NOIIIQOV )Wv'd /'31/1H9IH
:411; 1-4v-1,cf noISotI3
oNt/' IQY!!CJ =Or+NI' HQ
'�t1�Iln ' ' 'd .err nfwl�3tid
a -
08
e
JI...
1
1
(ind) vv4 3a(Y3rt IIt&
1
•
• nS .r. •
/
I , i
1 ,-/-J
C//
./
I- my / , �;
I r- / /[T1 1 / • / / /
I I' • /
/' 1 /
I / / ,' / / /
I I 1 // / / / / ,'
1 ; ', '// //• / // / /f 1''
/ / // /
/
177
60C / / / �.
/ / / // /
/ 1 / /
/ / / /
O
J
Q
J
C.•
SITE DATA
1S'((
- 140 F.F.
I--••■ WATER LATERAL
SANITARY SEWER TRUNK
202 31•K • 001111Y440455140414/ 3411NT N4440.1
S2f3NNI ld / S2133NlSN3 / S2ic 3A8flS
'ONI''03 ONR3M f1S ONtll-9:11.7 - .
11 v
.cr.rl.•• •••
441.041
w r •INO ..1 1. 4.61
1i•0 • t I.
nollaad Nddd M3I/1HDIH
:OJ two-,aaa.+o0 r1ol5O
QNt% ' VrviC vliV f TD4/NId1/Q
'�lf1Itn ' W d ..e►Wnlw1-132id
10
40
0
H
E
!ia
z,
z:
�=3
all
WATER TRUNK - 1 LOT
-
I
li-A ....
11;__ -^•t!.... 1
----••• ;.7- gh-
-21=1111‘..--OSE'
-.7.'--
1.• - -• 'r-- -- - -L-o.
--"";.• • •
- - , •
4.: ,,...
•• ...... *dr r
e •r" i
L 7- i: C..,: ST NO 3
- ......6.4 ........ .1111•1111 1 ".772111114.1.71. ....
. )driRi'dy-{ 1)/;Eyr
‘ .
VALLE."( P---
."EVT.- - Ti- 'ACREcg:i'::
i ir— •—.7.._...gdii
; T • 1
CQU IT/iY.
,
kpt...,41-tAq
gr7.71
ki
L. ,t• • '• 7 I F77:-- c"? 1.....12.7)• 1
: •
. , ...
....
TREFFLE6 •ACRES
- , u ? • .......--P 1 i .• t:/,
\
- i
, ! • 7
• _
,E.I.:=Ez...., ,.
.• i J --v...... I I
. ' •-.----•••: e.%
- r -
...._, ., .
L -,i ',..6-;:iilTi
•
/
...•-•taw:gia/--.1411
r.
*LOST SPUR
COUNTRY /
CLUB..
is N 7
6
7
SUBJECT PARCEL
N
FIG#2
city of eagan
PUBLIC
WORKS
DEPARTMENT
SANITARY SEWER
MASTER PLAN
approved:
standard
plate #:
2
••••••••••••
66.7/6
V
•
j
12
82.0/ 82.0 /
37
.0
• LOST SPUR
COUNTRY
CLUB
, A
I:"ST 4.9/2.0
icIA1.67 t 1 31
,1
4101 F-77AT 4' -i -
,9 50
88 p
_1 r
- ---, -
1.
-g
r ..T43.7.1C4
• ErtilLi._
52.0
36
-,111•1.1111,
46.0/72
12"
1000
' JO, I'VL-Yi
_
30:
48.2/7
TREFFLE. ACRES -1
ri
1 it"
/98.0 56
_
41)
34
4
2
40.0/
29
•
-2S
r'.. - .;.....L.....--
,
?''s \ • I 1'950- 2,-..--
• --- i.`.- -•-'
/
i cc- . , T. \‘••.• ..- .,- 0\ . - (--? • 7 •
' .7 /.' '. '" ). ,\'\ -- 4 -
. Cj . — . '''' ‘' s '
—7 r"-------- - — • -- . 1 ,
--------------:-—.LI:
720/7202
S 00 L.
PARCEL
city of eagan
PUBLIC
WORKS
DE PARTMEN
WATER
MASTER PLAN
0
FIG#3 •
pate *:
standard
approved:
•
- 60"
T ,
•
H- b
L.:1,ST SPUR
_t. C0:1!• TRY
-H- c CLUB
ti
D ! fib` �►- 1
12-1
RILEY
r
SURD. ZEf,NDEP .
K°888.0':\
1-- H P. 4\\
588.0':
894_Q
_1_ r, �✓
1,-oP=i -'�,
.—�•
D,= c
•
859.3'
866.0 �` .. �T�.
CHC.JCL
24"'
DP -17
CQ P -T
SUBJECT PARCEL
N
FIG#I
city of eagan
PUBLIC
WORKS
DEPARTMENT
STORM SEWER
MASTER PLAN
approved:
standard
plate if :
19
Page 15/PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES
July 26, 1988
2. A cross -easement shall be provided along the western property
line of Lot 2.
All voted in favor.
HIGHVIEW PARR ADDITION - MILDRED S. HANSON
Chairman Pawlenty opened the next public hearing regarding a
proposal for a preliminary plat consisting of three lots on 2.27 R-1
(single family) acres located south of Highview Avenue and west or
Pilot Knob Road in the southeast quarter of Section 4.
Mr. Sturm stated an application has been submitted requesting a
preliminary plat for the Highview Park Addition consisting of three
single family lots on 2.27 previously zoned R-1 acres located along
the south side of Highview Avenue just west or Pilot Knob Road. He
stated Lot 7 originally was approved as a single home site. Other
lots in the area had been split one time; all are at least 100 teet
wide. The lots, as proposed, meet the R-1 requirements of 12,000
square feet and are 85 feet wide at the 30' setback line. However, if
a line were drawn between the existing home on Lot 7 and the home on
Lot 6, the lots are only in the 80 foot to 85 foot width area. The
major concern is keeping the large lot integrity of the original
Highview Acres Addition. When the Highview Avenue was approved in the
early 1980s, one utility service was provided in anticipation of one
split to the lot.
The developer did not comment at the meeting.
Jim Nickle, 1426 Highview, stated he had discussions with 18
neighboring residents and they have serious reservations regarding
the proposal. He stated two new lots would be smaller than the other
lots in the area. They would prefer one lot only divided out. Mr.
Nickle submitted a petition to the Commission signed by 18 of the 21
landowners.
William Scarre, 1430 Highview, expressed concern as to the size
of the lot. He stated the proposal may have changed since he received
his notice.
Mr. Graves asked how many other lots had been split. Mr. Sturm
explained and diagramed how the adjoining lots were previously split.
Mr. Graves stated he would prefer not splitting the lots
differently from the rest of the neighborhood. Mr. Merkley stated he
favors only one split. He questioned if the minimum size is met,
could the Commission prevent the split.
City Attorney Jim Sheldon stated that in the Swanson case, the
trial court upheld a factually similar case. Mr. Sheldon stated the
131
Page 16/PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES
July 26, 1988
Commission could review the matter, but it's ability to prevent when
requirements are met is limited.
Member Wilkins stated as long as the requirements are met, she
felt the Commission must approve the proposal. She stated the
original lots were large because of the lack of sewer and water.
Member Trygg agreed with Wilkins.
Chairman Pawlenty asked if the City could adopt an ordinance to
improve quality standards. Member Wilkins questioned if with the
original Highview Addition there was any covenant.
John Odink, 2855 Pilot Knob, was the original developer and
first platted the property. He stated the original covenants
restricted the property to lots of 2.5 acre size. However, the
covenants were subsequently nullified.
Mr. Voracek questioned if the matter was approved, could a
condition be added of locating their house at a point on the lot with
a width of 85 feet.
Mr. Sheldon stated it could be established as a proposal,
however, if the setbacks are met, there must be a rationale.
Mr. Graves stated the neighbors are against the proposal and the
Commission should strive tor quality. He reiterated his opposition.
Chairman Pawlenty agreed with Mr. Graves.
Wilkins moved, Voracek seconded, the motion to close the public
hearing and approve a preliminary plat for Highview Park Addition
consisting of three lots on 2.27 R-1 (single family) acres located
south of Highview Avenue and west of Pilot Knob Road in the southeast
quarter of Section 4, subject to the following conditions:
1. The standard conditions of plat approval as adopted by
Council action on September 15, 1987, shall be complied with: A-1,
B-1, B-2, C-1, C-2, D-1, E-1, F-1, and G-1.
2. The building setback shall be on an imaginary line between
the existing homes on Lots 6 and 7.
3. No setback variances shall be allowed for newly created home
sites (Lots 1 and 2).
4. Development is required to provide a storm sewer outlet to
the existing low areas in the areas of 1 and 2.
area.
5. The driveway to be located in the high point of the street
6. Lots 1 and 2 shall connect to City utilities.
Page 17/PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES
July 26, 1988
Garry, Trygg, and Wilkins voted in favor; Voracek, Pawienty,
Merkley and Graves voted against.
Mr. Graves asked the developer if he would like to return before
the Commission or go forward to the Council.
Bract Swenson, who was representing the developer, said they
would go forward.
Graves moved, Voracek seconded, the motion to deny a preliminary
plat consisting ot three lots on 2.27 R-1 (single family) acres
located south of Highview Avenue and west of Pilot Knob Road in the
southeast quarter of Section 4. The reason for the denial was because
this type of division is unacceptable for the neighborhood. Voracek,
Pawlenty, Merklev and Graves voted in favor; Garry, Trygg and Wilkins
voted against.
Chairman Pawlenty stated the reason for the denial was because
of the possible legal grounds which legal counsel will research
further. Mr. Voracek stated his interpretation of the 85 foot
ordinance was that all the houses should be set in a line.
WOODLANDS 2ND ADDITION - ROBERT ENGSTROM COMPANIES
Chairman Pawlenty convened the next public hearing regarding the
application for a preliminary plat consisting ot twelve lots on 7.35
R-1 (single family) acres located north of Basswood Lane in the
southeast quarter of Section 14.
Assistant City Planner Jim Sturm stated an application had been
received requesting a preliminary plat for The Woodlands 2nd Addition
consisting of 12 single family lots on 7.35 acres which was
previously zoned R-1 with The Woodlands Addition. This plat is in
conformance with the City's most recent land use plan that designates
the area D-10-3 units per acre. The variance is for the cul-de-sac in
excess of 500 feet (630 proposed).
Mr. Sturm stated there was virtually no other way to develop the
parcel and that all of the lots are above 90 feet wide at the setback
line; most are in the 110 to 120 feet range. The developer intends to
sell the lots for custom home sites and will have architectural
controls for each building as was the case with the Woodlands 1st
Addition. The cul-de-sac follows a ridge line that falls to low areas
on all sides. Except for the southeastern three lots, the site is
heavily wooded and well suited for executive home sites. An overall
grading plan was submitted, however, it is the developer's desire to
grade each lot individually to save as many trees as possible. The
William Brothers Pipeline easement forms the western property line
and it is suggested and it has been customary procedure to note that
easement in all abutting lots purchase agreements.
(�I
Agenda Information Memo
August 16, 1988, City Council Meeting
PRELIMINARY PLAT/WOODLANDS 2ND ADDITION
I. Preliminary Plat for Woodlands 2nd Addition/Robert Engstrom
Company, Consisting of 12 Lots on 7.35 R-1, Single Family Acres --
At its regular meeting held on July 26, 1988, the Advisory
Planning Commission held a public hearing to consider a
preliminary plat application for Woodlands 2nd Addition as
presented by Robert Engstrom Company. The plat consists of 12
single family lots abutting a cul-de-sac in excess of 500 feet.
Because the variance to the cul-de-sac length and the plat itself
coincide completely, this application was publicly noticed as a
preliminary plat and necessary variance, however, a separate
application for a variance has not been requested of the
developer. In its report, the Planning Department has indicated
that a cul-de-sac variance shall be approved as a condition of
plat approval. Therefore, at the discretion of the Council, the
variance to allow a cul-de-sac in excess of 500 feet may be
considered or staff may be directed to request a separate
variance application of the developer.
The Advisory Planning Commission is recommending approval of this
application as presented. The Advisory Parks and Recreation
Commission is recommending a cash dedication.
For a copy of the Planning and Engineering report on this matter,
please refer to pages /4;--/C.
For a copy of the APC action on this item, refer to pageslj(,* (�7.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: 1. To approve or deny a
variance for a cul-de-sac in excess of 500 feet (630 feet) and
2) To approve or deny the preliminary plat for Woodlands 2nd
Addition as presented.
lU�
CITY OF EAGAN
SUBJECT: PRELIMINARY PLAT VARIANCE (WOODLANDS 2ND
ADDITION)
APPLICANT: ROBERT ENGSTROM CO.
LOCATION: SE 1/4 SECTION 4
EXISTING ZONING: R-1 (SINGLE FAMILY)
DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: JULY 26, 1988
DATE OF REPORT: JULY 18, 1988
REPORTED BY: PLANNING AND ENGINEERING DEPARTMENTS
APPLICATION SUMMARY
An application has been submitted requesting a preliminary plat
for The Woodlands 2nd Addition consisting of 12 single family
lots on 7.35 acres previously zoned R-1 with The Woodlands
Addition. This plat is in conformance with the City's most
recent Land Use Plan that designates this area D-1 0-3 units per
acre. The variance is for the cul-de-sac in excess of 500 feet
(630 proposed).
There is virtually no other way to develop this parcel and all of
the lots are above 90 feet wide at the setback line; most are in
the 110-120 feet range. They vary in size from 12,700 sq. ft. to
55,945 sq. ft. The developer intends to sell these lots for
custom home sites and will have architectural controls for each
building as was the case with The Woodlands 1st Addition. The
cul-de-sac follows a ridge line that falls to low areas on all
sides. Except for the southeastern three lots, the site is
heavily wooded and well suited for executive homesites.
Although an overall grading plan was submitted, it is the
developer's desire to grade each lot individually to save as
many trees as possible. Since the Williams Bros. Pipeline
Easement forms the western property line, it has been a customary
procedure to note that easement in all abutting lots' purchase
agreements.
GRADING/DRAINAGE/EROSION CONTROL: The proposed cul-de-sac
(Tanglewood Court) was previously graded with the Woodlands
development. The grading proposed as a part of the Woodlands 2nd
Addition is required to create building pads for the proposed lot
development. The proposed fill slopes meet the City's 3:1 slope
criteria.
Storm sewer of sufficient depth and capcity to serve this site is
readily available in Basswood Lane. The development will be
required to provide an emergency overland drainage swale between
Lots 9 and 10 from the proposed low point in Tanglewood Court.
The existing low areas in the backyards of the proposed lots are
designed to receive only backyard runoff, no storm sewer will
discharge into these low areas.
No erosion and sediment control plan was submitted for staff
review as a part of the preliminary plat application. An erosion
and sediment control plan addressing the following general
criteria is required before issuance of a grading permit or final
plat approval: Slope stabilization, restoration specifications
after rough grading and utility installation, silt fence
placement and maintenance, lot benching, gravel construction
entrances, and diversion of runoff away from cut and fill slope
areas.
UTILITIES: Sanitary sewer service of sufficient capacity and
depth has been provided to the proposed Woodlands 2nd Addition
from the existing sanitary sewer in Basswood Lane.
Water main service of sufficient capacity and pressure has been
provided to the proposed Woodlands 2nd Addition from the existing
water main in Basswood Lane.
STREETS/ACCESS/CIRCULATION: Improved public street access has
been provided through Basswood Lane as a part of the Sunrise
Hills Addition development. The development is proposing to
serve the proposed lots through the use of a cul-de-sac street.
At the time of the platting of the Woodlands Addition, the
proposed cul-de-sac street was designed as a through street to
connect to the northwesterly adjacent property.
EASEMENTS/RIGHTS-OF-WAY/PERMITS: The development is proposing
street right-of-way widths in accordance with City Codes.
Sufficient right-of-way for Basswood Lane was provided with the
platting of the Sunrise Hills Addition.
All regulatory agency permits shall be acquired within the
appropriate time frame as required by the affected agencies.
ASSESSMENTS: The following pending assessments are identified
based on the rates in effect under Project 494 and the
developable area in the proposed Woodlands 2nd Addition:
P 1
PROJ # DESCRIPTION RATE QTY AMT
494 Storm Sewer Trunk .053/sf 258,514 $13,701
494 Water Trunk 1,250/ac 5.94 ac 7,425
TOTAL PENDING ASSESSMENT $21,126
The following assessments are attributed to the proposed Outlot A
in the Suncrest Addition. The underlying parent parcel of the
proposed Suncrest Addition had not been previously assessed for
water trunk or storm sewer trunk area assessments.
PROJ # DESCRIPTION RATE QTY AMT
494 Storm Sewer Trunk .056/sf 27,240 $1,525
494 Water Trunk 1,315/ac .625/ac 822
TOTAL PROPOSED ASSESSMENT $ 2,347
All final assessment obligations will be calculated based on the
quantities and dimensions of the final plat and in accordance
with the rates in effect at the time of the final plat approval.
THE WOODLANDS 2ND ADDITION CONDITIONS:
1. These standard conditions of plat approval as adopted by
Council action on September 15, 1987 shall be complied with:
Al, Bl, Cl, C2, C3, C5, D1, El, Fl, and G1.
2. Lots 7, 8, 9, 10, and 11 shall note the proximity of the
Williams Bros. Pipeline Easement in the purchase agreement.
3. The cul-de-sac variance, a length in excess of 500 ft.,
shall be approved. The planting in the center island shall
be reviewed by staff in conceptual form.
4. An emergency overland drainage swale is required between
Lots 9 and 10.
5. No storm sewer will be allowed to discharge into the back-
yard low areas of the propsed development.
STANDARD CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL
A. Assessments
1. This development shall accept its additional assessment
obligations as defined in the staff's report in
accordance with the final plat dimensions and the rates
in effect at the time of final plat approval.
B. Easements and Rights -of -Way
1. This development shall dedicate 10' drainage and utility
easements centered over all common lot lines and adjacent
to private property or public right-of-way.
2. This development shall dedicate, provide, or financially
guarantee its proportionate share of the acquisition
costs of additional drainage, ponding, and utility
easements as required by the alignment, depth, and
storage capacity of all required public utilities and
streets located beyond the boundaries of this plat or
outside of dedicated public right-of-way as necessary to
service this development.
3. This development shall dedicate all public right-of-way
and temporary slope easements for ultimate development of
adjacent roadways as required by the appropriate
jurisdictional agency.
4. This development shall dedicate adequate drainage and
ponding easements to incorporate the required high water
elevation necessitated by City storm water storage volume
requirements.
C. Plans and Specifications
1. All public streets and utilities necessary to provide
service to this development shall be designed by a
registered professional engineer in accordance with City
codes and engineering standards and policies, and
approved by staff prior to final plat approval.
2. A detailed grading, drainage, erosion, and sediment
control plan must be prepared in accordance with current
City standards and approved by staff prior to final plat
approval.
3. This development shall insure that all temporary dead end
public streets shall have a cul-de-sac constructed in
accordance with City engineering standards.
4. A detailed landscape plan shall be submitted on the
proposed grading plan and approved by staff prior to the
final plat approval. The financial guarantee shall be
included in the Development Contract and not released
until one year after the date of installation.
1 (t71
STANDARD CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL
PAGE TWO
5. All internal public and private streets shall be
constructed within the required right-of-way in
accordance with City design standards.
D. Public Improvements
1. If any public improvements are to be installed under a
City contract, the appropriate project must be approved
by Council action prior to final plat approval.
E. Permits
1. This development shall be responsible for the acquisition
of all regulatory agency permits in the time frame
required by the affected agency.
F. Parks Dedication
1. This development shall fulfull its parks dedication
requirements as recommended by the Advisory Parks and
Recreation Commission and approved by Council action.
G. Other
1. All standard platting and zoning conditions shall be
adhered to unless specifically granted a variance by
Council action.
Advisory Planning Commission City Council
Approved: August 25, 1987 September 15, 1987
Revised:
LTS#2
STANDARD
kc)
LO�p.�fivr--1
1—A4-12 MA P
Jfi4-1 • 1101
1CIRR/I
NIN/GLS COLTr
COURSE'r
awE Cil�'��f 11
9I �g ,.:) �I 15
zc�
m
ai�
T
/
/
r
D
v
8 D
a
E
Cv
r� j
"'Jim
8
% /
/
Yz
I
of
oc
r
4
0
w
r
o
0
U
Ny
"
P
Vi
if
PRELIMINARY PLAT, DRAINAGE,
GRADING, EROSION CONTROL,'
AND UTILITY PLAN
WOODLANDS 2ND ADDITION
•I. ••, tomo...•,•• •r• ,.•, 1 . •••,1
....,.4•4* ,.
MH. 4 .•••••r. Y• r., w tof23
TRI -LAND SURVEYING CO.,INC.
SURVEYORS / ENGINEERS / PLANNERS
TpMN CNTPE PFOrE550NAL BLDG • SLATE 202
1260TANKEE DOODLE BO.* • EAGAN, MN 9224
6.2-452-7P50
1.6D
i2 GG Nn' h0:03 .',..-:"01.•;.3-100 33.N 0521
L02 LAS • 0019 `ONC•SS3f•.dd 3.11N30 NN411
S2f3NNV3d / SM33NtON3 / SLIdL3n&1S
'3N1'.03 ONI&3A211S GNVI-I1:11
:C24 •1• ••Y
•,•o
r •coow
w•••••••••••
ww M •••w•WM •.•1
• ..w r�..�•r s•w
,o• • ••W pa w.i•• • 1 r
•.• •e�C'/•t.n� •�W 1•r•rtg.•r 4.11.1
Nolllaad a dZ sGN'd-1GOOP\
NV1d Alllllfl GM,
`7OWWN03 NOIS083 `9NIat1a9
139VNWdO `l'dld Mt/NMI-138d
O
Z
t\
�I\ /
s-\\ ,/ y
0
0
w
et
2
4,
/
1,
7
7
a
SI3
iii ilx
.Z.GG nn'n77v3 • hJa 3"13X70 31).MUO9ZI
ZOZ 7105 • 70-43 larA}Si3><+� a 1N3J •W•11
S2i3NNV'1d / S633NION3 / SHO.l3/ t'S
'3N1`'03 ONIA3A8f1S aNV1-I21I
nl._+n
......N .W M ...I
wII P.01
Y
•W
.M..
4
• • y IS..H .1....•••••••
lo• �.
a X113.: qW �w1 I1u u:a.••V�l
NOIlJGQV GNZ SQNV-1000M
NV1d .11111101 (INV
.`1081N00 NOIS083`ONIQVao
`30VNl'AIQ `IVld JIadNIW413ad
WATER TRUNK
8
856.064.4
, (...t N'
24 , E -,b
c`J_ 48" - ---
i EP 3N 0
877.2
876.3 ic-c.
• -
.• :1-',
r , . 1 ND
tD-s.../. 0. FD,4- 28 ' i E -e 42" •' -
•E- d
DP -9 .-.----:E--..1,7,2.7, ,E -f 48"
-DP-101-, 'N,...
848.0 I - . _I:
856.0
TOt. h
860.0 858.3
862.8 v.( SCOrr HILLS
-jL ':7I • <
AD DI'
D -w
o.,
'--I CAR R14.GE WE SCOT T
/7/
1 ri iLLS
GuLF
GAD' ENE- h 1
- D13-18 S. E Lti3P33,(431 ,),'\
‘.•:-'\-- ;"---- ,.,,-- i 873.0
---- LE.27,11,710!4 • __211 854.0/ i \\
\\ JP -16 41.1
1
-•-•,. 1-1,-,-,,..,..,
,i------. ,,c,--1 882.0
,/ P-'33
,:IP #1..■•■ ......gt. I
..........0 01410M., . _,,,pa.-- 882.0 ----,-JP- b I 879./
874.7
J P -5 9 _ i 1 ';'!"...-:..,z N • 854.0
0.. ! 832.0
.,....2- ---nn_887.0 ' -
JP -42 r 4 0
.7 - \
• ---', ," 894.0 vir:), \--,\
12.897.3 , 887.1 1 1.1j* 12
AJ • !..'•-.••!_'''. '• ''„;'‘ .',,,-„
' 88P99 -23I.58 81285- 8.78/opi J8-JP88P6..020
,.-.--
-.„
85
P-63 887.0c
5. ,
.s.1...'(002V-,1L.\
8997 JP -32 _' ';;, ,';,./':-•:-,.-,. .:-.:-:t 4"\:::(':-,E,._t, 7,%';*, ,.]`--,.::.-:-:I-y:c1,.''•
89
; "•
TA-•T
I
! , . , • .
NI= 880.4
4 - 884.0 - - -!: - -• ' . -- '
895.0 i-!:',..7:_•::;, il
. 1
' ---P-44---- '
0 7 -
! -
895:7
.,..-- 7-_
T FT; E,, ' .L7 - s \- • - ) _.1.: 2 l • J --n
--- 21 -j-m
/ .
•
y / _
to -JP-I9 30
i . v JP -58 <1. 874.0
- .•--.
877.5 \
-9
......;..• - - ., Ao,„ ..,„ 8822
8
N
r-olJ
73.0
_ _,
879.4
•
JP- 20
()
4 ) /
6",
•••:: SUBJECT PARCEL
FIG#1
city of eagan
PUBLIC
WORKS
DEPARTMENT,
STORM SEWER
MASTER PLAN
approved:
standard
plate IF:
_• t:sj
615/800 1
le ,7; 1
•-)
18"
161
67 6/86.0 49.6/66.0 75/
24" c.62)
24"
HILLS
51.4/720
11
118"
1
1
i.63.6/ 72.0
A00 1T;ON
61 8" LJ
c -J
CARRIAGE
HILLS
GOLF
COURSE
SCCTT
i
43 3/60 0 :16"
Man Mlle Mink MIN 11=1! OEM MO AM. MO MIR
I -r
G;.RDEN
LOTS
17.1/ 32 0
/ 10 MG
GROUND STOR.
H.W. L. l05
16"
A
__.
.
1 1
1 ; !)Lt
// T t:
.N.
.."7•Tfaistio'' : 1., t 1LF!"-::.
,,,,„217_ s* --',:r.' -)?,•/
I a ,
'._Z_ /'`,-L___"- ';•1:16 r
' 7
----2,f/c:. -r- ., -, . •,-.
(C:i 1,''-- - . . 1 ; ------H iLl•-_-...
.7 I
12"I i ' , 1 1 -1,,. . i i 1 i "
_emir_maw smo--_ mos min- eintimit-:
113 58.2-Z;
50.3/67.0,
1 ,z
i i ,
/
1 ,
_-_---.4 ',mi --S:01-7` Re.n/
____, lawir sum amok armiLl=M_IMINVIC.:u
- -- -
50.4/67.0
116"
1
FIG#3 •
city of eagan
PUBLIC
WORKS
DEPARTMENT
WATER
MASTER PLAN
approved:
standard
plate If:
Page 17/PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES
July 26, 1988
Garry, Trygg, and Wilkins voted in savor; Voracek, Pawienty,
Merkley and Graves voted against.
Mr. Graves asked the developer if he would like to return before
the Commission or go forward to the Council.
Brad Swenson, who was representing the developer, said they
would go forward.
Graves moved, Voracek seconded, the motion to deny a preliminary
plat consisting of three lots on 2.27 R-1 (single family) acres
located south of Highview Avenue and west of Pilot Knob Road in the
southeast quarter of Section 4. The reason for the denial was because
this type of division is unacceptable for the neighborhood. Voracek,
Pawlenty, Merklev and Graves voted in favor; Garry, Trygg and Wilkins
voted against.
Chairman Pawlenty stated the reason for the denial was because
of the possible legal grounds which legal counsel will researcn
further. Mr. Voracek stated his interpretation of the 85 foot
ordinance was that all the houses should be set in a line.
WOODLANDS 2ND ADDITION - ROBERT ENGSTROM COMPANIES
Chairman Pawlenty convened the next public hearing regarding the
application for a preliminary plat consisting of twelve lots on 7.35
R-1 (single family) acres located north of Basswood Lane in the
southeast quarter of Section 14.
Assistant City Planner Jim Sturm stated an application had been
received requesting a preliminary plat for The Woodlands 2nd Addition
consisting of 12 single family lots on 7.35 acres which was
previously zoned R-1 with The Woodlands Addition. This plat is in
conformance with the City's most recent land use plan that designates
the area D-10-3 units per acre. The variance is for the cul-de-sac in
excess of 500 feet (630 proposed).
Mr. Sturm stated there was virtually no other way to develop the
parcel and that all of the lots are above 90 feet wide at the setback
line; most are in the 110 to 120 feet range. The developer intends to
sell the lots for custom home sites and will have architectural
controls for each building as was the case with the Woodlands 1st
Addition. The cul-de-sac follows a ridge line that falls to low areas
on all sides. Except for the southeastern three lots, the site is
heavily wooded and well suited for executive home sites. An overall
grading plan was submitted, however, it is the developer's desire to
grade each lot individually to save as many trees as possible. The
William Brothers Pipeline easement forms the western property line
and it is suggested and it has been customary procedure to note that
easement in all abutting lots purchase agreements.
IS CD
Page 18/PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES
July 26, 1988
Bob Engstrom, developer, asked the Commission to approve his
request. There were no public comments.
Mr. Graves asked why the request for the customary notice
regarding the Williams Pipeline easement. Mr. Voracek stated it had
been the customary procedure because of the recent Williams explosion
in St. Paul.
Merkley moved, Garry seconded, the motion to close the public
hearing and approve the preliminary plat of Woodland 2nd Addition
consisting of 12 lots on 7.35 R-1 (single family) acres located north
of Basswood Lane in the southeast quarter of Section 14, subject to
the following conditions:
1. These standard conditions of plat approval as adopted by
Council action on September 15, 1987, shall be complied witn: A-1,
B-1, C-1, C-2, C-3, C-5, D-1, E-1, F-1 ana G-1.
2. Lots 7, 8, 9, 10, and 11 shall note the proximity of the
Williams Bros. Pipeline Easement in the purchase agreement.
3. The cul-de-sac variance, a length in excess of 500 feet.,
shall be approved. The planting in the center island shall be
reviewed by staff in conceptual form.
4. An emergency overland drainage
9 and 10.
5. No storm sewer will be allowed
low areas of the proposed development.
All voted in favor.
swale is required between Lots
to discharge into the backyard
SUNCREST ADDITION - WILLIAM BUTTNER
Chairman Pawlenty opened the next public hearing in regard to
the re -zoning of 10.53 agricultural acres to a single family district
and a preliminary plat consisting of 16 lots located north of Sunwooa
Trail and south of Birch Street in the soutneast quarter of Section
14.
Mr. Sturm informed the Commission that separate applications had
been received requesting a re -zoning of 10.53 agricultural acres to
single family district and a preliminary plat consisting of 16 lots
located northwest of the Sunrise Hills and Woodlands Additions and
south of the Wescott Garden lots. He stated the 100' wide Williams
Bros. Pipeline easement bi-sects the site in the southeast corner
creating an outlet that will be attached to the Woodlands 2nd
Addition. The plat calls for a road extension from Wescott Hills
Drive to the platted Birch Street right-of-way. It is anticipated
Agenda Information Memo
August 16, 1988, City Council Meeting
REZONING AND PRELIMINARY PLAT/SUNCREST ADDITION
J. Rezoning and Preliminary Plat for Suncrest Addition/William
Huttner for 10.53 A (Agricultural) Acres to an R-1 (Single
Family) District Consisting of 16 Lots --A public hearing was held
by the Advisory Planning Commission at its regular meeting on
July 26, 1988, to consider a rezoning and preliminary plat
entitled the Suncrest Addition as requested by WIlliam Huttner.
As submitted, the plat consists of 16 single family lots.
The Advisory Planning Commission is recommending approval. The
Advisory Parks and Recreation Commission is recommending a cash
dedication.
For a copy of the Planning and Eng veering Department report,
�,�
please refer to pages ( through (o7
For a copy of the APC action on this item, refer to page)(4 —/)0
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny a
preliminary plat entitled Suncrest Addition as presented.
i s�
CITY OF EAGAN
SUBJECT: REZONING, PRELIMINARY PLAT, VARIANCE
SUNCREST ADDITION
APPLICANT: WILLIAM HUTTNER
LOCATION: SE 1/4 OF SECTION 14
EXISTING ZONING: A (AGRICULTURAL)
DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: JULY 26, 1988
DATE OF REPORT: JULY 18, 1988
REPORTED BY: PLANNING AND ENGINEERING DEPARTMENTS
APPLICATION SUMMARY
Separate applications have been submitted requesting a Rezoning
of 10.53 A (agricultural) acres to an R-1 (single-family)
district and a Preliminary Plat consisting of sixteen lots
located northwest of the Sunrise Hills and Woodlands Additions
and south of the Wescott Garden Lots. This proposal is in
conformance with the City's most recent Land Use Plan.
SITE PLAN/EXISTING CONDITIONS
The 100' -wide Williams Brothers pipeline easement bisects this
site in the southeast corner creating an outlot that will be
attached to The Woodlands 2nd Addition. The plat calls for a
road extension from Wescott Hills Drive to the platted Birch
Street right-of-way. It is anticipated that this road will
continue to the northeast and then loop southward connecting to
Woodland Trail. Lot 5, block 1 and lots 9, 10, and 11, block 2
will be final platted as outlots since no immediate access is
being provided to them. A stand of mature oaks is in the south
central portion of the site where the stovepipe lots are being
requested. If careful lot grading and driveway grading are
followed, along with some retaining walls, it may be possible to
save some of these trees. Code requires a 50' minimum width at
the street right-of-way line. These stovepipe lots are 30' wide
at that point. All other lots are at least 90' wide at the
typical 30' setback line. They vary in size from 14,150 sq ft.
to 60,000 sq. ft.; most have walkout capability. These custom
built homes would be built exclusively by William Huttner.
GRADING/DRAINAGE/EROSION CONTROL: The preliminary grading plan
submitted as a part of this application proposes cut and fill
areas ranging from 18' +/- in the area of the proposed flag lots
connection to Sunwood Trail and 10' +/- along the westerly edge
of proposed Sunwood Trail, respectively. The Development is
proposing a 4' high retaining wall in the backyard areas of Lots
7,. 8 and 9 of Block 2 and along the common lot line between Lots
6 and 5, Block 2. The Development will be required to submit
detailed plans and specifications for the proposed retaining
walls for staff review and approval. In the proposed house pad
areas for Lots 3 through 6, Block 2, the Development is proposing
to leave the grading for the house pads on those Lots up to the
discretion of the home builder.
The Development is proposing to convey the site generated storm
water runoff into Pond JP -60. Pond JP -60 is a designated ponding
area on the City's Comprehensive Storm Sewer Plan. The cutlet
for Pond JP -60 into Pond JP -41 was constructed in conjunction
with the development of the Sunrise Hills Addition. The
Development will be required to extend a storm sewer outlet to
the northerly boundary of the plat. This northerly storm sewer
extension should be designed to handle approximately 8 cfs of
storm water runoff. The Development will be required to supply
staff with proposed walkout elevations for the house pads in the
area of Pond JP -60. At this time there is no way of knowing if
the proposed house pad elevation encroaches below the high water
level of the pond.
There are two landlocked low areas created with this Development.
Die to the fact that the only runoff being conveyed to these
landlocked low areas is back yard runoff from the proposed house
pads, the runoff into them will be minimal and outlets will not
be required. These two landlocked low areas are located in the
backyards of Lots 1, 2 and 3 and Lots 5, 6, 8 and 10, all in
Block 2.
No erosion and sediment control plan was submitted for staff
review as a part of this preliminary plat application. The
following items are required to be addressed in an erosion and
sediment control plan prior to any grading permits being issued
or final plat approval:
1. Lot Benching.
2. Specifications for seeding and mulching the site should be
included in the proposed plan. All disturbed areas are
required to be seeded and mulched within 48 hours after
rough grading.
3. The site map should identify an ingress and egress point for
the site. A rock construction entrance pad will be
necessary at ingress and egress points to minimize tracking
of mud by vehicles onto paved surfaces.
4. The silt curtain must be properly installed before any land
disturbances occur. A detailed drawing for the installation
of the silt curtain should also be included on the plan.
5. The revegetation of all areas disturbed by utility
construction must be addressed in the proposed plan.
6. Maintenance of erosion and sediment control measures during
and after rough grading should be included in the proposed
plan.
7. The company responsible for maintaining and removing all
erosion and sediment control practices should be identified.
8. A storm sewer inlet filter is required around all catch
basins to prevent sediment movement into pond areas.
9. All storm sewer outletting into water bodies should be
adequately protected to prevent scouring from occurring at
the outlet.
10. Identify on the plan where topsoil will be stockpiled.
11. All fill slopes are required to be 3:1 or less.
12. Include construction schedules for rough grading, installing
utilities, revegetating the site, building construction,
curb and gutter, and blacktopping. These schedules impact
erosion and sediment control requirements.
UTILITIES: Sanitary sewer service of sufficient depth and
capacity is readily available to the site in Wescott Hills Drive.
The existing sanitary sewer in Wescott Hills Drive was provided
as a part of the Sunrise Hills Development. The Development will
be required to extend sanitary sewer service to its northerly
property line -at a low enough elevation to serve the northerly
adjacent Wescott Garden Lots, if and when, that area ever
develops.
Water main service of sufficient pressure and capacity is readily
available in Wescott Hills Drive. The water main service in
Wescott Hills Drive was provided with the development of the
Sunrise Hills Addition. The Development will be required to
provide a water main stub to the northerly adjacent property.
STREETS/ACCESS/CIRCULATION: Street access to this site is
readily available from the existing Wescott Hills Drive. The
Development is proposed to be served by a 60' wide street
connecting Wescott Hills Drive with the northerly adjacent Birch
Street. Birch Street is a platted right-of-way but unimproved at
this time. The Development will required to construct a
temporary cul-de-sac at the north end of the proposed
Development.
EASEMENTS/RIGHTS-OF-WAY/PERMITS: The appropriate easements will
be required on the sanitary sewer and water main service extended
to serve Lots 3, 4, 5 and 6 of Block 2. The Development will be
required to provide the appropriate ponding easement for Pond JP -
60 to incorporate the required high water level and storage
volumes in accordance with the City of Eagan's Comprehensive
Storm Sewer Plan.
All regulatory agency permits shall be acquired within the
appropriate time frame as required by the affected agency.
ASSESSMENTS: The assessments which would normally be proposed as
a condition of final plat approval are being collected/agreed
upon by the execution of Waiver of Plat #14-W-9-5-88.
SUNCREST CONDITIONS:
1. These standard conditions of plat approval as adopted by
Council action on September 15, 1987 shall be complied with:
B1, B2, B3, B4, Cl, C2, C3, C5, D1, El, Fl, and G1.
2. The developer shall note the proximity of the Williams
Brothers pipeline easement in the purchase agreement for each
lot abutting it.
3. A Variance for stovepipe lot widths shall be approved (lots
3, 4, 5, and 6, block 2).
4. Outlot A shall be included with The Woodlands 2nd Addition or
the lot line between lots 4 and 5 shall be extended to the
eastern property line.
5. Lot 5, block 1, and lots 9, 10, and 11, block 2 shall be
final platted as an outlot.
6. Development is required to submit detail plans of the
proposed retaining wall construction for staff review and
approval prior to issuance of a grading permit and/or final
plat approval.
7. Development is required to provide an 8 cfs storm sewer
outlet to the northerly adjacent property.
8. Development is required to extend sanitary sewer service and
water main service to the northerly adjacent property.
STANDARD CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL
A. Assessments
1. This development shall accept its additional assessment
obligations as defined in the staff's report in
accordance with the final plat dimensions and the rates
in effect at the time of final plat approval.
B. Easements and Rights -of -Way
1. This development shall dedicate 10' drainage and utility
easements centered over all common lot lines and adjacent
to private property or public right-of-way.
2. This development shall dedicate, provide, or financially
guarantee its proportionate share of the acquisition
costs of additional drainage, ponding, and utility
easements as required by the alignment, depth, and
storage capacity of all required public utilities and
streets located beyond the boundaries of this plat or
outside of dedicated public right-of-way as necessary to
service this development.
3. This development shall dedicate all public right-of-way
and temporary slope easements for ultimate development of
adjacent roadways as required by the appropriate
jurisdictional agency.
4. This development shall dedicate adequate drainage and
ponding easements to incorporate the required high water
elevation necessitated by City storm water storage volume
requirements.
C. Plans and Specifications
1. All public streets and utilities necessary to provide
service to this development shall be designed by a
registered professional engineer in accordance with City
codes and engineering standards and policies, and
approved by staff prior to final plat approval.
2. A detailed grading, drainage, erosion, and sediment
control plan must be prepared in accordance with current
City standards and approved by staff prior to final plat
approval.
3. This development shall insure that all temporary dead end
public streets shall have a cul-de-sac constructed in
accordance with City engineering standards.
4. A detailed landscape plan shall be submitted on the
proposed grading plan and approved by staff prior to the
final plat approval. The financial guarantee shall be
included in the Development Contract and not released
until one year after the date of installation.
STANDARD CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL
PAGE TWO
5. All internal public and private streets shall be
constructed within the required right-of-way in
accordance with City design standards.
D. Public Improvements
1. If any public improvements are to be installed under a
City contract, the appropriate project must be approved
by Council action prior to final plat approval.
E. Permits
1. This development shall be responsible for the acquisition
of all regulatory agency permits in the time frame
required by the affected agency.
F. Parks Dedication
1. This development shall fulfull its parks dedication
requirements as recommended by the Advisory Parks and
Recreation Commission and approved by Council action.
G. Other
1. All standard platting and zoning conditions shall be
adhered to unless specifically granted a variance by
Council action.
Advisory Planning Commission City Council
Approved: August 25, 1987 September 15, 1987
Revised:
LTS#2
STANDARD
1 C„‘
OF-. HAP
JA+L. 11O-1
rtel-c—ar
a , _
CoIRRIAGE.'
HILLS GOLF -----
couRsi
-(,' • '.,-'
"-., •c--.1 L,.---i-
,t :,._-...,, `..1
- _,...., 0,..., ,..__L• -,___,:„•,,e,..,_Hr....„. ..1s,,,vr
' t.,• ' '4' - - L---_,',"' I :•,U w,LL Av—.....,•-•'3'Z e,.
: E.••:• SAN.. 29 ,.., ..,,,,,,.. I- ,,,Rtri
;:,' 5 , ..___ ,, .„:: '},e• .!J aSrOC,-:\ I '-'' 9-----,. ---'-' --(-a
(4,_ ,i -----
E,-._ 0 4,1<i: ;',:•. - : ) ,,
CMTCP GLEN
GARDE N L.TS
WESCOTT
CARRIAGE
HILLS
GOLF
COURSE
//:///
ii-A`O/C' (7'
J
�\� , 77///#--
:\' \\� ` I 3i4 Lyes.
\\\ `\----,I 'L,/./.;-..
//, \\\�,`\ ` 1\ \\\.'''' J ;:
./7
\\*#\'.\\'` \\.\\---:=-:----- \N...,
1\\\\\,t1,\,\e.\\,,,,-,.--\:\\N\\\''\\\'.%.\\,,N\\\\''':\
-\\\\,:\\\* 1 li
k\'\
1A8a
‘14 ‘11.
0
)
f�! /
�R� � fJ•.
•
/
C� I;i.
t- s
/ \<...<- 14437 ),)
V.\\\V:k\\
/(/////ok \4„tAz'\'`
\\*\
\AI\.����,�
40'\
rOt
0
id 4-A\
-1 _J*‘,V
/ Wt V�
( (7_
it)/
o
/ C./ Sro
I if
0
Page 18/PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES
July 26, 1988
Bob Engstrom, developer, asked the Commission to approve his
request. There were no public comments.
Mr. Graves asked why the request for the customary notice
regarding the Williams Pipeline easement. Mr. Voracek stated it had
been the customary procedure because of the recent Williams explosion
in St. Paul.
Merkley moved, Garry seconded, the motion to close the public
hearing and approve the preliminary plat of Woodland 2nd Addition
consisting of 12 lots on 7.35 R-1 (single family) acres located north
of Basswood Lane in the southeast quarter of Section 14, subject to
the following conditions:
1. These standard conditions of plat approval as adopted by
Council action on September 15, 1987, shall be complied witn: A-1,
B-1, C-1, C-2, C-3, C-5, D-1, E-1, F-1 ana G-1.
2. Lots 7, 8, 9, 10, and 11 shall note the proximity of the
Williams Bros. Pipeline Easement in the purchase agreement.
3. The cul-de-sac variance, a length in excess of 500 feet.,
shall be approved. The planting in the center island shall be
reviewed by staff in conceptual form.
4. An emergency overland drainage
9 and 10.
5. No storm sewer will be allowed
low areas of the proposed development.
All voted in favor.
swale is required between Lots
to discharge into the backyard
SUNCREST ADDITION - WILLIAM HUTTNER
Chairman Pawlenty opened the next public hearing in regard to
the re -zoning of 10.53 agricultural acres to a single family district
and a preliminary plat consisting of 16 lots located north of Sunwooa
Trail and south of Birch Street in the southeast quarter of Section
14.
Mr. Sturm informed the Commission that separate applications nad
been received requesting a re -zoning of 10.53 agricultural acres to
single family district and a preliminary plat consisting of 16 lots
located northwest of the Sunrise Hills and Woodlands Additions and
south of the Wescott Garden lots. He stated the 100' wide Williams
Bros. Pipeline easement bi-sects the site in the southeast corner
creating an outlet that will be attached to the Woodlands 2nd
Addition. The plat calls for a road extension from Wescott Hills
Drive to the platted Birch Street right-of-way. It is anticipated
Page 19/PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES
July 26, 1988
that the road will continue to the northeast and then loop soutnward
connecting to Woodland Trail. Lot 5, Block 1 and Lots 9, 10, and 11,
Block 2 would be final platted as outlots since no immediate access
is being provided to them. A stand of mature oaks is in the south
central portion of the site where the stovepipe lots were requested.
Through careful lot gracing and driveway grading it may be possible
to save some of the trees. Code requires a 50' minimum width at the
street right-of-way line. The stovepipe lots are 30' wide at that
point. All other lots are at least 90' wide at the typical 30'
setback line. The custom built homes would be built exclusively by
William Huttner.
There are two landlocked low areas created with the development.
Due to the fact that the only runoff conveyea to these landlocked low
areas is backyard runoff from the proposed house pads, the runoff
into them will be minimal and outlets will not be required. The two
landlocked low areas are located in the backyards of Lots 1, 2 and 3
and Lots 5, 6, 8, and 10, all in Block 2.
The developer stated the unusual design of the addition was to
save as many trees as possible. He asked the Commission to grant
approval of his request.
John Overson, stated he did not want additional assessment on
the north property. He stated he did not want a road to run up to nis
property as it would interfere with his farming. He urged the
Commission to deny the request.
Ed Devlin, 355 Trails End, stated he would like more information
as to what type of development would be developed.
Brad Swenson stated that the loss of the two lots would be
costly to the developers. He stated Engstrom was a quality builder.
He stated the area was adjacent to high quality homes.
Mr. Devlin asked what type of assessments would be assessed
against the adjoining property. Mike Foertsch stated there are no
foreseen assessments at this time.
Chairman Pawlenty asked if a common driveway could be used in
regard to the stovepipe lots. Brad Swenson stated it would be a big
problem tor the builders.
Member Wilkins asked if Huttner haa purchased the west property.
She was informed he had not. Wilkins haa concerns regaraing the
outlot on the Woodlands Addition. Mr. Merkley questionea the future
development of the future road connection. Mr. Graves asked if the
road could be prevented from extending to the adjoining property. Mr.
Sturm stated it is policy to require the full extension. Mr. Voracek
asked if a barrier could be constructed. Mr. Sturm said there would
be a problem with the easement.
t(Q9
Page 20/PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES
July 26, 1988
Mr. Graves asked for a report on the status or Wescott Hills
Drive. Mr. Sturm stated it would be a future connection and no action
was necessary at the present meeting.
Trygg moved, Voracek seconded, the motion to close the public
hearing and approve the re -zoning of 10.53 a (agricultural) acres to
an R-1 (single family) district. All voted in favor.
Trygg moved, Voracek seconded, the motion to approve the
preliminary plat for Suncrest Addition consisting of 16 lots located
north of Sunwood Trail and south of Birch Street in the southeast
quarter of Section 14, subject to the following conditions:
1. These standard conditions of plat approval as adopted by
Council action on September 15, 1987, shall be complied with: B-1,
B-2, B-3, B-4, C-1, C-2, C-3, C-5, D-1, E-1, F-1, and G-1.
2. The developer shall note the proximity of the Williams
Brothers pipeline easement in the purchase agreement for each lot
abutting it.
3. A variance for stovepipe lot widths shall be approved (lots
3, 4, 5, and 6, Block 2) .
4. Outlot A shall be included with The Woodlands 2nd Addition or
the lot line between lots 4 and 5 shall be extended to the eastern
property lone.
5. Lot 5, block 1, and lots 9, 10, and 11, block 2 shall be
final platted as an outlot.
6. Development is required to submit detail plans of the
proposed retaining wall construction for staff review and approval
prior to issuance of a grading permit and/or final plat approval.
7. Development is required to provide an 8 cfs storm sewer
outlet to the northerly adjacent property.
8. Development is required to extend sanitary sewer service ana
water main service to the northerly adjacent property.
Trygg stated that City staff should address the concerns of John
Overson regarding the road interfering with his farming.
All voted in favor.
WESCOTT SQUARE ADDITION - NEW HORIZON HOMES
Chairman Pawlenty opened the next public hearing in regards to
the application for a preliminary plat of 9.83 R-3 (townhouse) zoned
CV)
MEMO TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIIMEMBERS
FROM: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES
DATE: AUGUST 15, 1988
SUBJECT: ADDITIONAL INFORMATION FOR AUGUST 16, 1988 CITY COUNCIL
MEETING
DEPARTMENT HEAD BUSINESS
B. Police Department --The Eagan Police Explorers returned from
the National Law Enforcement Explorer Conference in mid-July and
announced their first place award in the area of crime
prevention. Police Officer Doug Matteson, who is the advisor and
responsible for the Explorer program for our Police Department,
attended the law enforcement exploring conference with our
Explorers and would like to present the trophy at the City
Council meeting tomorrow evening. Please refer to the attached
memo referenced as page 3A that addresses both the award and
Explorers program.
NEW BUSINESS
A. GO and Special Assessment Bond Sale Date --At the
organizational meeting in January, the second City Council
meeting in September was changed from September 20 to September
19 to observe the start of Yom Kippur. The bond sale date as
discussed on page 74 in the packet should be changed to September
19.
/S/ Thomas L. Hedges
City Administrator
police department
JAY M.BERTHE
Chief of Police
PATRICK J. GEAGAN
Administrative Captain
city of eagan KENNETH D. N
Operations Captch Captain
3830 Pilot Knob Road
Eagan, Minnesota 55122
Phone: (612) 454-3900
August 10, 1988
TO: TOM HEDGES
FROM: DOUG MATTESON
SUBJECT: EXPLORER RECOGNITION
VIC ELLISON
Mayor
THOMAS EGAN
DAVID K. GUSTAFSON
PAMELA McCREA
THEODORE WACHTER
Council Members
THOMAS HEDGES
City Administrator
EUGENE VAN OVERBEKE
City Clerk
As you are aware, the Eagan Police Explorers returned from
the National Law Enforcement Exploring Conference held at
Boston University July 11-16. I am pleased to announce the
four Explorers from Eagan received a first place award in the
area of crime prevention. Our Explorers competed against
3300 other youth from across the nation, in events ranging
from Domestic Crisis Intervention to Bomb Threat Response.
Because only eight first place trophies were awarded at the
conference, I feel that the delegation from our post should
be recognized before our Mayor and City Council allowing
these Explorers the opportunity to "show off" their trophy.
The Police Department began the Exploring Program two years
ago, and since, the Explorers have donated over 3000 hours to
the city, patroling the parks system during the evenings and
weekends, and also spending countless hours assisting the
Police Department in non -enforcement areas. Many of these
Explorers are attending college or plan to be attending, most
looking toward a Law Enforcement career. I feel that the
program the Eagan Police Department sponsors prepares and
assists the Explorers to enter the competitive field of Law
Enforcement.
Please feel free to contact me at work or home with any
qu etions .
Officer Doug Matteson
DM/lb
THE LONE OAK TREE. THE SYMBOL OF STRENGTH AND GROWTH IN OUR COMMUNITY
3�
MEMO TO: HONORABLE MAYOR & CITY COUNCILMEMBERS
FROM: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES
DATE: AUGUST 12, 1988
SUBJECT: INFORMATIVE
DONATION OF FLAG POLES
As the City Council recalls, Dick Hanson from Lexington Standard
Corporation has donated flagpoles for the Public Works Central
Maintenance Facility and Fire Stations #4 and #5. The flagpoles
are up at both the Public Works 4cility and Fire Station #4 and
look great. Attached on page (7 is a copy of a letter sent to
Mr. Hanson expressing our appreciation. Mr. Hanson has contacted
me and sent a letter expressing a desire to remain anonymous and,
therefore, would sooner not attend a Council meeting in the
future. We are planning to send nice photos of the flagpoles to
Mr. Hanson so he can display them within his organization.
CITY OF CANNON FALLS
Attached on page 1?J is a letter from the City Clerk/Treasurer
of the City of Cannon Falls regarding the Dakota Electric
Economic Development rate proposal. If the City Council desires
a resolution or correspondence, please direct the City
Administrator at the August 16 Council meeting.
MLC
Progress is being made regarding the constitutional challenge of
the disparity aid section of the 1988 Omnibus Tax Bill. The City
Administrator will keep the City Council posted of any further
development on that law suit.
FIRE DEPARTMENT /
Enclosed on page tX0 is a copy of a letter sent by Marsha Frank,
1735 Hickory Hill to our Eagan Fire Department. The neighbors of
the Frank's lost approximately 60% of their house in a recent
fire that was responded to and extinguished by our Fire
Department.
PROTECTIVE INSPECTIONS MONTHLY REPORT
Enclosed on pages i ? 7 through 14 0 is a copy of the July
Protective Inspections report.
METROPOLITAN COUNCIL POPULATION ESTIMATE
Enclosed on pages_4(_through is a copy of the
Metropolitan Council preliminary April 1, 1988, population and
household estimates for the City of Eagan. Keep in mind that
statistical data for calculating population and household
estimates were gathered during the fall of 1987. Therefore, the
data used for this calculation is already 8 - 10 months old.
Also, population is determined on a household average of the
entire metropolitan area. The City of Eagan's household average
is definitely higher in the metropolitan household average and,
therefore, the population number is again distorted by the number
of children who reside in our community.
LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES REGIONAL MEETING
The League of Minnesota Cities Regional Meeting is scheduled for
Monday, September 12 at Robert Lee'est ur t in the City of
New Brighton. Enclosed on page(s) Lt ( is a copy of the
official notice. If anymember of t CityCouncil would like to
attend, please indicate at the next Council meeting and
arrangements will be made.
CHAMBER OF COMMERCE/TWINS SUPPORT
Enclosed on page IACe is a letter that was sent to the
Minnesota Twins organization by the President of the Eagan
Chamber and the Northern Dakota County Chambers of Commerce
emphasizing support for the relocation of the Minnesota Twins to
our community.
NORTH CENTRAL CABLE
CORRESPONDENCE
Enclosed on page L9 7 and ( is a copy of a letter from John
Eddy and his attachment which is a letter to the St. Paul Pioneer
Press Dispatch regarding the public access issue.
AFFIRMATIVE ACTION PLAN/CITY OF EAGAN
Like many municipalities, the City of Eagan does not have a
certified affirmative action plan. Administrative Assistant has
prepared a memo that summarizes the need, purpose and action to
be taken by the City of Eagan regardi a preparation of such a
plan. That memo is enclosed on pages through
AMM UPDATE
Enclosed on page(s) t3 — ( is a memorandum from the
Association of Metropolitan Municipalities providing an update on
a variety of metro issues. Specifically, the Board is soliciting
recommendations for the Transportation Advisory Board (TAB) and
nominations to replace John Walker, who has resigned as a member
of the AMM Board. If the Council wishes to recommend or
nominate anyone for these positions, or if any Councilmember
wishes to be considered for one of these positions, staff will
prepare the appropriate correspondence on behalf of the Council.
In addition, the update includes items on the disparity aid
lawsuit and major discussion issues before the AMM for the coming
77-
legislative session.
DAKOTA COUNTY LANDFILL SURCHARGE INCREASE
Enclosed on page(s) r'���- you will find a memorandum from
Administrative Assis ant Hohenstein covering a proposed ordinance
increasing the Dakota County Landfill surcharge from $.25 to
$2.62 per cubic yard or, roughly, $8 per ton. The purpose of
this increase is to raise revenue for landfill abatement
activities including County support for local recycling
activities. It is inevitable that this cost increase will be
passed on to Eagan businesses and residents and will tend to
create pressure for volume based fees and recycling alternatives
to keep disposal costs as low as possible.
MONTHLY FIRE DEPARTMENT REPORTS
Enclosed on page(s)are the monthly Fire Department
reports for April, May, and June 1988.
HRA STATUS REPORT FOR ASSISTED HOUSING & COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
Enclosed on page (sk}-Q o _2 ' 0 is a copy of the Dakota County
HRA status report for assisted housing and community development
programs for Dakota County and the City of Eagan.
TREE SWING SPECIFICATIONS
My father-in-law obtained a copy of a tree swing specif'cation he
thought we might all enjoy. Please reference page 0 .
/s/ Thomas L. Hedges
City Administrator
11 3
city OF cagcin
3830 PILOT KNOB ROAD, P.O. BOX 21199
EAGAN, MINNESOTA 55121
PHONE (612) 454-8100
AUGUST 1, 1988
MR. RICHARD HANSON, PRESIDENT
LEXINGTON STANDARD CORP.
1243 EAGAN INDUSTRIAL ROAD
EAGAN, MN. 55123
RE: Letter of Appreciation - Donation of Flagpoles
Dear Mr. Hanson:
VIC ELLISON
Mayor
THOMAS EGAN
DAVID K. GUSTAFSON
PAMELA McCREA
THEODORE WACHTER
Council Members
THOMAS HEDGES
City Administrator
EUGENE VAN OVERBEKE
Cy Clerk
Due to the exceptional rate of growth experienced by the City of Eagan,
several public buildings had to be constructed to provide service to our
community. With the recent completion of the Public Works Central Maintenance
facility and Fire Station #4 and the pending completion of Fire Station #5,
considerable effort was put forth by the City to make these facilities
architecturally complimentary to the community.
However, with the City's frugal budget allocations for these facilities, often
times we cannot provide the amenities with construction which really helps to
identify these facilities as public buildings.
Your recognition of the City's constraints and your desire to provide a
community service through the donation of 5 flagpoles and flags for these
facilities is highly commendable and very much appreciated by the City of
Eagan.
As a small token of our appreciation, we would like to present you with a
commemorative momento at a future Council meeting demonstrating what your
generosity has done for the appearance of our facilities which has helped to
instill a sense of pride in our community by both the employees and citizens
of Eagan. I will contact you in the near future to discuss a time that would
be convenient for you.
Please accept my heartfelt appreciation for your generosity and community
involvement. Thank you for being such a good corporate citizen of Eagan.
Sincerely,
GHQ
Thomas L. Hedges, Cit Administrator
cc: Vic Ellison, Mayor
Thomas A. Egan, Council Member
Pamela McCrea, Council Member
TAC/TLH/jf
David Gustafson, Council Member
Theodore Wachter, Council Member
Thomas A. Colbert, Director of
Public Works
THE LONE OAK TREE THE SYMBOL OF STRENGTH AND GROWTH IN OUR COMMUNITY
CITY OF CANNON FALLS
GOODHUECOUNTY
306 W. MILL STREET
CANNON FALLS, MINNESOTA 55009
Phone
(507) 263-3954 July 28, 1988
Tom Hedges
City Administrator
3830 Pilot Knob Road
Eagan, MN 55122
Re: Dakota Electric Economic Development Rate Proposal
Dear Mr. Hedges:
As you may know, Dakota Electric has recently filed a rate
proposal with the Minnesota Public Utilities Commission. This
proposal would provide an incentive rate for new industrial users
of over 100 kw per month.
Dakota Electric has not previously been competitive in its
electric rates and this new rate will go a long way to put our
communities on par with others served by NSP. I urge you to write
to the Minnesota Public Utilities Commission to support this rate
filing. The future development potential of our communities will
be enhanced greatly by this new energy rate. Approval by the
Public Utilities Commission is not a certainty. So, please take
the time to express your community's support. Thank you.
Very truly yours,
n Lr'
Dallas Larson
City Clerk/Treasurer
DL/kmh
Please write to: Mary Ellen Hennen, Executive Secretary
Minnesota Public Utilities Commission
790 American Center Building
St. Paul, MN 55101
ins
r(Aile/ft--t4/7-124,e,di,-e4-1,,c-az-e,?"4
/t.Le' 7/Le
+-exc, „2_,Zz77‘,772i,d7c, _
iirrtyd-a/.1.6616gievez_et-,, -tit,(%/_„./t/,/a";11‘4(4/
(9 //Ice # yeAi
//i4-64.3 y6A-
zvet,_1-77 „2.,744,eztAct.-0,
ZiA-6 7 35-Xaciee-5_
PROTECTIVE INSPECTIONS MONTHLY REPORT - JULY 1988
NUMBER OF PERMITS ISSUED THIS MONTH YEAR-TO-DATE
193 965
Electrical
Plumbing
HVAC
101 580
154
788
Water Softener
Signs
Well, Cesspool, Septic Tank
D
13
67
14
91
1
5
NATURE OF BUILDING PERMITS ISSUED
MONTHLY
TYPE
VVl-11l/ 3 1SJ S1✓✓J-S 'J a.
INDUSTRIAL
NO.
VALUATION
PERMIT FEE PLAN REV FEE
TOTAL FEE6
10 FOUNDATION
0
1 $
1$
41.00 $
$
41.0C.
416 SINGLE FAMILY
200,000
'
57 .
5,685,000'
32,186.00
16,093.00
1
153,496.5C
24
DUPLEX
j
RES. ADDITIONS
2
126,0001
852.00,
426.00
2,166.0C
4,935.5C
34
TOWNHOUSE
45,200
484.001
0
�
223
MISCELLANEOUS
23
231,669
4'
CONDO
1,860.5C
1
0 I
0
-
0 rLiPT RT MIS
2
HOUSE MOVES
0
I
0 AGRICULTURAL
0
14 COMMERCIAL
44 COMM/IND REMODEL
6 6,548,000
6
347,000
19,418.001
2,230.00
9,709.00 113,851.5C
1,074.00
3,477.5C
3
1
2
VVl-11l/ 3 1SJ S1✓✓J-S 'J a.
INDUSTRIAL
0
I
0
0
INSTITUTIONAL
5
PUBLIC FACILITIES 2 1
200,000
1
100.00
8
RES. GARAGES
1
8,000
90.001
95.00
41
RES. ADDITIONS
12
186,000
1,642.001
416.00
2,166.0C
27
SWIM POOL
5 1
45,200
484.001
122.00
629.5C
223
MISCELLANEOUS
23
231,669
1,740.001
1,860.5C
1
DEMOLISH
0
-
2
HOUSE MOVES
0
I
858
MO. TOTALS
115
13,376,869
58,683.00
27,840.00
` 280,653.5(
- 1
ADJUSTMENTS Add-on
Epp
+ 16.001
+ 16.5(
857
YEAR-TO-DATE
68,488,536
347,594.001
166,031.50 1,642,086.1(
PROTECTIVE INSPECTIONS - MONTHLY REPORT
DATE
JULY 1988
MULTI -FAMILY
BREAKDOWN
TYPE
MO.
# OF
PERMITS
MO. # OF
BUILDINGS
YTD # OF
BUILDINGS
MO.
# OF
UNITS
YTD.
# OF
UNITS
r # OF
PERMITS
VOIDED
# OF
UNITS
MOVED IN
DUPLEX
2
1
12
2
24
3 -PLEB
1
3
4 -PLEB
5 -PLEB
10
40
6-PLFY
2
12
7 -PLEB
8-PLEX
1
10-PLEX
12-PLEX
16-PLEX
,
APT. BLDG.
1
OTHER
y
TOTAL: j
2 1
25
2 1
79
BLDG. 1
PERMIT # 1
1
1
1
15291 1
15299
PROTECTIVE INSPECTIONS MONTHLY REPORT
COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL & INSTITUTIONAL BREAKDOWNS
DATE JULY 1988
ADDRESS & LEGAL
2000 CLIFF LAKE RD
L3, B1, CLIFF LAKE CTR
4185 BRADDOCK TRAIL
L1, Bl, EAGAN H.S. ADD.
1
1
1
1 DAYTON HUDSON
1
1 IND. SCH. DIST 19f1
OWNER
1
1
1
1 $
1
VALUATION
2,500,000
2,447,000
1
1 OCCUP.
1
'COMM NEW
1
1 COMM NEW
I 2105 CLIFF ROAD 1
15328 1 L1,B1, CED CLIFF COMM PK 41 M. AUSTIN SMITH
15358
15378
15394
15309
• 1440 DUCKWOOD DR
1 L1, BI, PONDV1EW
1
1
1
1
1
1
4565 SCOTT TRAIL
L1, BI, CED CLIFF COMM PK
1325 TOWN CENTRE DR
L1, B1, TOWN CTR 70 9TH
4425 PILOT KNOB RD
L1, B 77, SECT. 28
1
1
1
674,000 'COMM NEW
/ EAGAN MEDICAL
1 BLDG PARTNERSHIP
1 NEW HORIZON
3 CHILD CARE
1
1 PIZZA HUT INC
1
CITY OF EAGAN
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
470,000 •COMM NEW
1
257,000 'COMM NEW
1
200,000 'COMM NEW
1
180,000 'PUB. FAC.
15310
15300
15347
15346
• 3501 LEXINGTON AVE
L1, B2, SECT. 15
1
• CITY OF EAGAN
•
1
1
20,000 •PUB. FAC.
1 1030 LONE OAK RD
1 L10 -13,B5, EAG CTR PK #3
1 1230 EAGAN IND RD
• L1 -4,B3, EAGN CTR PK ##1
1 1301 CORPORATE CTR DR /NW MUTUAL LIFE
1 L1,B3, EAGANDALE OFC PK #11
1
1 OPUS CORP
1
• NW MUTUAL LIFE
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
108,000 TINT. IMPR.
1
80,000 'INT. IMPR.
1
76,000 •1NT. IMPR.
1 1230 EAGAN IND Road 1 1
15311 • L1 -4,B3, EAG CTR IND PK ##11 NW MUTUAL LIFE 1
1
58,000 'INT. IMPR.
15324
1 3376 COACHMAN ROAD
1 L2, B1, BBD 2ND
1 1
1 BBD INVESTMENTS 1
1
18,000 LINT. IMPR.
15348
1 1230 EAGAN IND. RD 1
1 L1-4, B3, EAG CTR IND PK 11 NW MUTUAL LIFE
1 1
1 1
1
1
1
1
1
7,000 •INT. IMPR.
1
1
1
I
1
$
1
1
•
1
1
1
1
t
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
I
1'
1
1
I
1
1
$
1
1
1
1
1
I
I
1
1
1
1
1
•
1
1
$
1
$
/
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
I
1
1
1
$
1
1
1
l 11
PROTECTIVE INSPECTIONS MONTHLY REPORT - JULY 1987
IUMBER OF PERMITS ISSUED THIS MONTH YEAR-TO-DATE
159 s 1,203
:lectrical
' lumbing
IVAC
90 726
116
870
later Softener
;igns
1e11, Cesspool, Septic Tank
2
77
10
81.
4
7
NATURE OF BUILDING PERMITS ISSUED
MONTHLY
11L
TYPE
NO.
VALUATION
PERMIT FEE
PLAN REV FEE
TOTAL FES
10
FOUNDATION
7
$
$ 105.00
$ ' 105.00
423
SINGLE FAMILY
69
6,570,850
33,277.50
16,638.50
170,640.50
40
DUPLEX
6
349,000
2,142.50
1,071.25
13,600.25
84
TOWNHOUSE
5
303,000
1,828.00
914.00
11,403.50
CONDO
APT BLDGS
0
AGRICULTURAL
24
COMMERCIAL
5
2,588,000
8,206.68
4,103.25
62,523.43
71COMM/IND
REMODEL
12
452,600
2,715.80
1,155.90
4,098.70
COMM/IND ADDITION
1
17,500
149.50
74.75
233.25
0
INDUSTRIAL
0
INSTITUTIONAL
1
PUBLIC FACILITIES
28
RES. GARAGES
5
28,150
327.00
342.00
24
RES. ADDITIONS
' 4
65,400
548.80
241.65
823.45
14
SWIM POOL
4
35,900
346.00
364.00
188
MISCELLANEOUS
34
125,193
1,608.50
161.25
1,868.25
2
DEMOLISH
1
HOUSE MOVES
-,1
ADJUSTMENTS
921
TOTALS
152
10,535,593
51,255.28
24,360.55
266,002.33
YEAR-TO-DATE
91,023,312
385,534.13
186,133.15
2,115,470.78
iII
METROPOLITAN COUNCIL Mears Park Centre, 230 East Fifth Street, St. Paul, MN. 55101 612 291-6359
July 22, 1988
To: Local Government Contact People
The Metropolitan Council staff has prepared preliminary April 1, 1988
population and household estimates for your community. These preliminary
estimates, together with a fact sheet containing the primary data used to
prepare your community's estimates, are enclosed.
The Council would like to hear your comments or concerns before finalizing the
estimates for the State Department of Revenue. The change in estimated
population or number of households is a part of the formula used to determine
levy limits applicable in 1988 for counties and for cities of 5,000 or more
population. The Council also uses the numbers to monitor population and
household changes in Metropolitan Area communities.
Please address questions concerning the levy limits and local government aids
to Rich Gardner, Minnesota Department of Revenue, 296-2286.
We'd like to finalize these estimates by August 15, 1988. To do this we need
your comments as soon as possible. If you have concerns about the estimates,
please contact Kathy Johnson of the Council's staff at 291-6332 as soon as
possible. We will make every attempt to work with you to make any necessary
adjustments in time to be incorporated in the Revenue Department's
calculations. Written comments may also be directed to Ms. Johnson at the
Council's new mailing address.
Because the population and household estimates are of great iipert`noe to the
cities, as well as to the Council in its planning work, we want to provide
estimates that are not only accurate but treat each city fairly and
consistently. If you have any questions or concerns, please do not hesitate to
call. Thank you for your prompt attention to this matter.
Sincerely,
Steve Keefe
Chair
SK/ do
Enclosures
k�-
l81
METROPOLITAN COUNCIL PROVISIONAL POPULATION ESTIMATE - APRIL 1, 1988
City or Township EC n
1988 Housing Units
Estimated Total
Housing (Including
Estimate 1980 Uncompleted Estimated Estimated
By Type Housing Units 1987 Permits) Completed Occupied/
Single-Family 1 UI 3 1 o 0 0 I 1 6` SI b 7
Townhouse ' O �cO ' W S�
multifamily16S- � SI Z I °t X13 �{
Mobile Home ' 0 3
TOTAL 12D �o L11 -1 ( -too 15-5-iI
Household Estimates
1980 Household Estimate
1987 Household Estimate
1988 Household Estimate
Population Estimates
1980 Total Population
1980 Group Quarters Population
1988 Group Quarters Population
1988 Population in Households
1988 Population Estimate
Persons Per Household
1980 Persons per Household
1987 Persons per Household
1988 Persons per Household
'All numbers are as of April 1 of each year.
3`1
5751 L(
20100
(0. 9ct
`( 2 SSS
3tog\
�8 i
DAKOTA COUNTY
Apple Valley
Burnsville
Castle Rock Twp.
Coates
Douglas Twp.
Eagan
Empire Twp.
Eureka Twp.
Farmington
Greenvale Twp.
Hampton
Hampton Twp.
Hastings (Pt.)
Inver Grove Heights
Lakeville
Lilydale
Marshan Twp.
Mendota
Mendota Heights
Miesville
New Trier
Nininger Twp.
Northfield (Pt.)
Randolph
Randolph Twp.
Ravenna Twp.
Rosemount
Sciota Twp.
South St. Paul
Sunfish Lake
Vermillion
Vermillion Twp.
Waterford Twp.
West St. Paul
COUNTY TOTAL
APRIL 1, 1988
POPULATION i.ND HOUSEHOLDS ESTIMATES
Population
April 1, April 1,
1980 1988
Census Estimate
Households
April 1, April 1,
1980 1988
Estimate Estimate
21,818 31,674 6,376 10,320
35,674 46,687 12,080 17,662
1,340 1,503 395 468
207 192 65 65
614 623 164 179
20,700 42,556 6,824 15,594
1,224 1,370 360 416
1,268 1,375 373 420
4,370 5,350 1,511 1,882
641 675 187 202
299 322 101 111
848 964 223 263
12,811 14,481 4,197 5,138
17,171 21,477 5,551 7,575
14,790 20,500 4,337 6,827
417 649 222 319
1,655 1,595 431 425
219 219 80 85
7,288 8,680 2,210 3,056
179 179 49 52
115 115 31 33
774 851 201 230
13 20 3 5
351 356 110 117
385 425 118 133
1,683 1,936 433 524
5,083 7,420 1,456 2,358
242 276 75 82
21,235 20,361 7,748 8,042
344 379 107 131
438 559 123 169
1,070 1,229 281 334
486 502 164 181
18,527 18,591 7,501 8,374
194,279 254,091 64,087 91,772
righton
,$)
(4)
(sp
•
r -
Dear City Official:
extend to you a c.,..)rdial in%ii.:ation to teo
Minnesota Citie5; Regional MeoLing hc_.st,7.J. by tne City of t:ew
Brightol: on Monday, Septemb:::r 12, 1988, at _Rbse,11.t (Hwy 694
2 & Silver take Road).
0 The aft.srnoon program, 1-,e.7,incilng
tati:.,n en personnel issues :i,:ch iS hiring, ftirnp,
and deve,loping an affirrnatdve ctie' proq;:am-
P.M. iJy:xe will be two separae rr,undtables c.cuEis the
aspect; of Minnesota s u7= syst:,1
is 137egressing with its comparabl,- wortn
From 5:00 - 5:30, CMC will p.c.,.:‘vid ,,itn a
Z slide presentation on tno 'State of tiieCi. . jAoluae
uJ latest informtien about ti:le :tati;;,; ,:j_nn- ota
suc as ti:ends in spending, pzope7:ty
sonal contact your le-.L7islators
can discuss these critical issues attrC
We will be serving dinner at 6.1F 12.1't.: A.11
focus on legislativF! issues of ,Illicrtatoc
0
00 City efficials will be asked ir,put: for of the
LeagtiCs 1989 City Policies ind P;:i;Drities fo..c Au -
0 tien. To round cut the program, w wi1. te bearAn7 from the
Legislators and Lec,islative Candidates.
To make reservations for your ancLa--;
3 req.istl:at.Ln form as soon as in :ase canradr.-Jns,
plz::3a notify Pat LindTlist “513-3), by Thursday,
Your citv. will be billeq frr tl-se
0 eancel by aEorementione6
:)'1y 27, 1925
SincJ2rely,
CITY OF 1.4EW;i GFTCN
1/
. ex' 1 •
• ,•;,,.• ,•;.•
R(..,brt J.Eeukla
LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES REGIONAL MEETING
Monday, September 12, 1988
Registration Form
We will have city officials attending the Regional
Meeting in New Brighton. We agree to pay for the meals unless we
notify you of any changes by Thursday, September 8, 1988.
Names/Titles of persons attending:
Person making reservation:
City: Phone:
Number of attendees
x $12.00 = $ (enclosed)
Please make checks payable to City of New Brighton, and return
with your registration form to:
Pat Lindquist
CITY OF NEW BRIGHTON
803 - 5th Avenue NW
New Brighton, MN 55112
145
MENDOTA
HEIGHTS
EAGAN
WEST
ST. PAUL
ROSEMOUNT
F -1l
July 27, 1988
NORTHERN DAKOTA,COUNTY
CHAMBERS OF COMMERCE
1301 Corporate Center Drive #116
Eagan, Minnesota 55121 612-452-9872
Serving
Eagan Chamber of Commerce
Mendota Heights Chamber of Commerce
Rosemount Chamber of Commerce
West St. Paul Chamber of Commerce
and the Cities of Lilydale, Mendota and Sunfish Lake
Mr. Jerry Bell, President
Minnesota Twins
The Metrodome
501 Chicago Avenue South
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55415
Dear Jerry:
The Eagan Chamber of Commerce, a division of the Northern Dakota
County Chambers of Commerce, would like to extend an offer of help
and support in your campaign to bring the World Champion 'Twins to
Lagan.
Whip• we realize that your preference would be to stay at your pre-
sent location under ideal conditions, we want you to know that we
would consider- it an extreme honor to have you seriously consider
our city as an attractive alternative.
We pledge our support in these efforts and ask that you call upon
us whenever and wherever we can he of assistance.
Congratulations on a fine season and "Let the Rally Continue".
Sincerely,
Kirk Duholnl, President Norman Storbakken, President
Pagan Chamber of Commerce NDC Chambers of Commerce
I),Ini&1 A. Aber}'.
1.1xccutive Director
1)AA:db
cc: Tom Hedges
\qL
North Central Cable Communications Corporation•934 Woodhill Drive•Roseville, MN 55113•(612) 483-3233
July 26, 1988
Mr. Thomas Hedges
Burnsville/Eagan Cable Commission
3830 Pilot Knob Road
Eagan, MN 55122
Dear Mr. Hedges:
We are enclosing for your information, Cable TV North Cent'ral's response to
statements made by the Chairman of the North Suburban Cable Commission, in
an article which appeared in the July 20th issue of the St. Paul Pioneer
Press Dispatch.
John R. Eddy
Chief Operating Officer
JRE/grs
Enclosure
North Central Cable Communications Corporation•934 Woodhill Drive•Roseville, MN 55113•(612) 483-3233
July 26, 1988
St. Paul Pioneer Press Dispatch
345 Cedar Street
St. Paul, MN 55101
To The Editor:
An article in the July 20, 1988 issue of the St. Paul Pioneer Press Dispatch entitled, "Cable Firm
Asks Cities To Run Public Access", quotes Dr. Ronald C. Eggert, Chairman of the North Suburban
Cable Commission, as follows:
'They're Tying; they're just trying to usurp us," said Ron Eggert, Chairman of the
North Suburban Cable Commission, referring to the company's reported costs. He
said the company repeatedly has failed to produce itemized accounts. As a result,
the North Suburban Commission plans to conduct its own audit.
We regret, that the Chairman of the Commission has chosen to use this type of false and
inflammatory rhetoric as a way to avoid dealing with the substance of a cable television consumer
issue, which has been before the North Suburban Cable Commission for over two years.
The issue is that Cable TV North Central is being required by the Commission to incur a cost of
$4.34 per month per subscriber for public access and local origination programming, on cable
channels 33 and 52, plus, $.41 per subscriber, per month for excessive insurance company
security bonds. Anyone who visits our Public Access facilities knows that they are objectively
over -staffed, underutilized and grossly inefficient. We can provide this service for much less than
we are presently required to spend.
Because of this officially imposed inefficiency, our costs for these functions are the highest of any
cable system in the United States, and it follows that although cable subscribers receive
absolutely no offsetting benefit, their rates must be expected to be unnecessarily higher than
elsewhere.
We are seeking only to eliminate this inefficiency, to bring bonding to a reasonable level and
thus, to reduce pressure on the rates our subscribers must be asked to pay. This would not
reduce the public access and local origination service on cable channels 33 and 52. Everybody
would win.
We do not understand the Commission's objectives in forcing the Company to be inefficient and
to waste the money of its subscribers.
Never once, have we been able to discuss this matter with Chairman Eggert or the Commission
in a calm and reasoned manner.
'9)
Ltr./Editor
July 26, 1988
Page Two
Over the two-year period that our request has been before the Commission, we have furnished
the Commission with each and every report or account requested of us. Our books and records
are completely open to the Commission.
Recently, Chairman Eggert, made an appointment to meet with Mr. Hauser, Chairman of Cable
TV North Central. Hours before the meeting, Chairman Eggert discourteously advised our staff
that he refused to meet with Mr. Hauser. Mr. Hauser telephoned the office of Chairman Eggert,
but Chairman Eggert refused to take the call and has never had the courtesy to return it.
Meetings of Chairman Eggert's Commission are well known for their needlessly hostile
atmosphere, which seems to preclude any substantive consideration of our request.
Representatives of Cable TV North Central do not feel welcome or comfortable at these
inhospitable meetings which, to date, have failed to address the inefficiency and waste of money.
As an example, our attorney was recently prevented by Chairman Eggert from speaking at a
public meeting of the Commission. Chairman Eggert actually summoned police officers and
threatened him with arrest, although under Minnesota law he had an absolute right to speak.
Because Commission meetings are videotaped, the record is available for inspection by any
interested party.
We are seeking to cooperate with the Commission in everyway possible to assure the best cable
service for the community at the lowest possible price. We urge Chairman Eggert to fulfill his
duties as an appointed official by addressing this matter in an objective, timely and courteous
manner. The Commission owes nothing less to the 14,600 North Suburban cable subscribers,
who must ultimately bear the burden of continued waste and inefficiency.
Sincerely,
hn R. Ed
hief Oper
JRE/grs
g Officer
l��
MEMO TO: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES
FROM: ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT DUFFY
DATE: JULY 28, 1988
SUBJECT: AFFIRMATIVE ACTION PLAN/CITY OF EAGAN
Per your request, I am writing this memo to attempt to summarize
the events of the last two weeks relating to the subject of
Affirmative Action Plans in general as required by the state and
specifically to the subject of an Affirmative Action Plan for the
City of Eagan.
Approximately two weeks ago, the City received a notice from the
League of Minnesota Cities regarding recent state agency actions
which affect cities. Included in the middle of that notice was a
reference indicating that the State Commissioner of Human Rights,
Stephen Cooper, had stated that all local governments must have a
state certified Affirmative Action Program in place by August 1,
1988 and that failure to have a certified plan in place could
mean the loss of all state aids for a municipality.
I immediately contacted the League to attempt to discover (1) On
which state law this requirement was based, and (2) Why we had
not been informed sooner of this requirement. The League
explained the history of the situation as follows:
1. During the 1988 legislative session, basically one word
was changed in the State Human Rights Act. The
state's contract compliance section provision requiring
all "businesses" to have Affirmative Action Plans was
changed to "person". By definition, cities, schools
and counties are included in the word, "person".
2. The net effect of this change is that cities (etc.)
that execute an agreement with the state to transfer
funds for any reason if the funds are for more than
$50,000 and the city (etc.) has more than 20 full-time
employees at any time during the previous 12 months are
required to have a state certified Affirmative Action
Plan by August 1, 1988.
3. Amazingly, none of the lobbyists representing cities,
counties and school districts caught the significance
of the change in wording. This change and its
consequences were not even discussed by the
legislature.
4. What happened next is a little cloudier. But it
appears that the Commissioner was questioned in late
July regarding this change by an attorney and asked if
it meant that cities (etc.) had to have Affirmative
1°•\,0
Action Plans in place by August 1, 1988 in order to
receive any kind of state funding in excess of $50,000.
We do not know if the Commissioner had realized the
significance of the change before this time, but he
answered yes to the question. The attorney proceeded
to write a letter to all city attorneys informing them
of the commissioner's statement (and also informing
them that the attorney was experienced in and willing
to prepare Affirmative Action plans for cities which
did not have them).
5. Many cities so notified then contacted the League which
began investigating the situation.
After informing you of the above information, I began collecting
materials necessary to develop the required Affirmative Action
plan for the City of Eagan. I am now writing the first draft of
such a plan.
In addition, a week ago, I attended a personnel directors'
meeting at which Joel Jamnik from the League was present.
Needless to say, the main topic of conversation was Affirmative
Action. Jamnik stated that the League was requesting
clarification from the Director of Human Rights regarding several
points, but that the League was advising that all cities affected
by the legislation make a good faith effort to comply to the
provision. He stated that the Director was very firm in his
stand to enforce the legislation.
I have personally contacted the State Human Rights Department and
have received an extension from the August 1 deadline. That
extension is to September 15, 1988. I expect to have the draft
of the Affirmative Action plan finished by the end of next week.
It will then be available for review/revision by the department
heads and City Council.
The City is already an Equal Employment Opportunity employer.
Therefore, we are already practicing the spirit of the
Affirmative Action Plan with regards to personnel and hiring
matters, including publishing EEO statements in newsletters and
in hiring printed matter. The plan will require formal paperwork
and tracking regarding EEO/AA in personnel matters.
However, Affirmative Action does not only affect personnel. It
also encompasses any programs put on by the City, such as
recreation programs; any appointments made by the City to
commissions and committees; any contracts entered into by the
City; and, indeed, all vendors utilized by the City. All
departments in the City will be affected by the plan and it will
require additional procedures to be performed by most of them.
Yesterday, we received a further communication from the League
which stated:
"The full scope of the legislation is still unclear. In two
letters the League has specifically asked for an
interpretation by Commissioner Cooper regarding
applicability of this statute to Local Government Aid and
other transfer payments such as state aid for highways and
indicated the League's interpretation that the law applies
only to contracts, grants, and other transfers that require
the execution of written agreements. To this date,
Commissioner Cooper has not responded to the League's
request for a formal interpretation and without further
clarification from the Department of Human Rights, the
League- can only advise cities that the safest course to
follow would be to attempt to receive contract compliance
certification as soon as possible. To this end,
Commissioner Cooper has indicated that communities which
contact his office by August 15, 1988, and begin the
process of obtaining certification, will not be disqualified
from receiving state contracts and grants as long as they
are continuing to make progress toward certification. In
short, contact the compliance certificate division as soon
as practical and keep in contact with them as your policy
development progresses."
The Affirmative Action Plan for the City of Eagan is an important
document. After the draft is completed, it should be reviewed by
all concerned. However, the State Human Rights Department has
compiled a set of guidelines (requirements) which must be
included in any affirmative action plan in order to receive
certification from the State. In speaking with a compliance
officer, I was informed that the State "did not encourage any
originality" in preparing the plans and wanted their guidelines
followed as presented.
I will forward the draft to you as soon as it is completed. If
you require any additional information in the meantime, please
contact me.
/uL
Administrative Assistant
assoc!ation of
metr000Rtan
municipalities
August 5, 1988
TO: MEMBER MAYORS,, DELEGATES AND MANAGERS/ADMINISTRATORS
FROM: VERN PETERSO ` �4ECUTIVE DIRECTOR
ROGER PETERS ,. DIRECTOR OF LEGISLATIVE AFFAIRS
RE: AMM AND METROPOLITAN ACTIVITIES OF IMPORTANCE
1. TRANSPORTATION ADVISORY BOARD (TAB) NOMINATIONS:
Ten positions on the Transportation Advisory Board are reserved for
municipal elected officials. (The TAB By -Laws specify that the
AMM has the responsibility for nominating these officials). It is a
two year term and the new terms will commence October 1, 1988. The
AMM Board will be making these nominations at its September Board
meeting.
The TAB is a very important body and provides general transportation
advice and counsel to the Metropolitan Council, Regional
Transportation Board and the Minnesota Department of
Transportation, etc. One of its most important functions is to
annually determine the FAU project funding priorities. The TAB
normally meets the third Wednesday afternoon of each month in the
Metropolitan Council Chambers.
RECOMMENDATIONS WANTED:
The AMM Board is soliciting recommendations for these positions via
this Bulletin. Recommendations must be in writing and should be
submitted to the AMM Office, to the attention of Vern Peterson, by
no later than Wednesday, August 24, 1988.
2. VACANCY ON AMM BOARD:
Due to the resignation of John Walker, former Mayor of Newport, from
the Board of Directors, there is a vacancy on the AMM Board. The
AMM Board is responsible for the general management of the affairs
of the Association and supervises the administration of the AMM office
and affairs through the Executive Director. The Board meets the
first Thursday night of each month at 7:00 P.M. in the AMM office at
183 University Ave., East., St. Paul.
183 university avenue east, st\aCA nesota 55101 (612) 227-4008
NOMINATIONS WANTED:
The AMM Board is soliciting nominations via this Bulletin.
Nominations should be in writing and should be submitted to the AMM
Office by no later than Wednesday, August 24, 1988. The Board is
likely to give preference to nominations from the East Side of the
metro area to maintain geographical balance.
3. 1989 PROPOSED METROPOLITAN COUNCIL WORK PROGRAM AND BUDGET:
The Metropolitan Council has scheduled a public hearing for 10:00
A.M. on Monday, September 12 to receive input on its' proposed 1989
Budget and Work Program. The AMM's Metropolitan Agencies Committee,
Chaired by Kevin Frazell, Mendota Heights Administrator, will review an,
assess that proposal and prepare a report for the AMM Board's
consideration. The AMM Metro Agencies Committee will begin its
review at a noon meeting in our offices on Thursday, August 11th. and
Dave Renz, the Council's Executive Director and other Department
Heads are expected to be present to brief the committee and answer
questions. Your input and or attendance at this meeting is welcomed.
The AMM is usually the only group or organization that reviews and
offers comment to Council's yearly budget proposal and we feel it is
an important public service for the residents of this region.
4. LAWSUIT ON DISPARITY AID FILED:
The lawsuit challenging the constitutionability of the disparity aid
element of he 1988 Omnibus Tax Act, has at last been filed. The
plaintiff is a resident of Roseville and the suit was brought in
Ramsey County District Court . It is expected that the suit will be
transferred to the Tax Court in the near future. As was noted and
explained in the last AMM Bulletin dated July 12th., the AMM Board
of Directors is supporting this lawsuit which was initiated by the
Municipal Legislative Commission. We will keep you posted as this
legal challenge progresses through the Courts.
5. REVISED METROPOLITAN SIGNIFICANCE RULES READY FOR PUBLIC HEARING:
The AMM through its Metropolitan Agencies Committee, as has been
noted several times in recent Bulletins and Newsletters, has been
engaged in a year long dialogue with the Metropolitan Council over
the content of the revised rules. This effort will end in the near
future as the Council will be holding a public hearing on the final
draft of the 'Significnace Rules' in late September. We are happy to
report that out of the 12 concerns/disagreements raised by the AMM
Committee, 10 of them have been resolved to the AMM's satisfaction!
We will continue to negotiate in hopes of resolving the remaining
differences and the AMM Metropolitan Agencies Committee will hold
its final meeting on this matter on Thursday noon, August 25th.
Please do not hesitate to contact Vern Peterson (227-4008) should
you have questions regarding this matter.
6. AMM OUTREACH BREAKFASTS - VERY SUCCESSFUL!!
The third annual series of local official outreach breakfasts have
just been completed. They were, by any measure, very successful.
Eighty participants from 41 member and 3 non member cities
attended the five regionally located meetings and provided a
significant amount of issue oriented input. The meetings were very
animated and did not lack for strong opinions on many items ranging
from comparable worth to land use to truth in taxation. The input on
policy is now being discussed and acted upon by the AMM policy
committees which will continue to meet through September. Possibly,
as beneficial to the AMM staff, Board, and attending officials
as policy, is discussing AMM goals and how we as an organization
can better communicate and be strengthened. Good suggestions for
the legislative contact program and interaction with members was
received and is being acted upon. We will continue to improve local
official interaction with more opportunities for participation.
7. LEGISLATIVE CONTACT PROGRAM:
The Board appointed Legislative Coordinating Committee is currently
looking at results of last years contact program and discussing
input from the Outreach Breakfasts. This promises to be an
interesting and exciting year of evolutionary growth. Two primary
areas of increased activity will be more in depth education for
contact persons and an effort to have local officials and their
legislators meet in small groups to concentrate lobbying a few of the
extremely important AMM issues. Scheduling for these meetings will
be targeted for November after election through December prior to
convening of the legislature. A third new activity being
investigated is a pre election survey of legislative candidates in
key city issues. Based on last years results, it became clear that
the coordinator intern must be on board earlier, therefore, a search
will begin soon leading to a possible October start date. Finally,
local officials are still very much interested in a 'score card'
report of how their particular legislator voted on city issues.
The committee will continue studying this item to determine an
appropriate way to provide that information without incurring
legislative backlash as has been feared in the past. The committee
is developing a mission or program goal statement and compiling a
list of possible activities that will help promote and understand
the need for this effort with member local officials.
8. MAJOR DISCUSSION ISSUES FOR 1989-1990
COMPARBLE WORTH. One of the hottest topics for the policy committee
in 1989 is standards for the implemention of pay equity.
Disagreement as to the satisfactory range of pay and which employees
should receive pay equity increases among legislators, state
officials, and local plans are commanding significant attention.
LAND USE RECODIFICATION. The Governors Task Force on State and
Local relations proposed some major recodification and unification
of land use control statutes in the last session. Within the
legislation were controversary surrounding increased Planning
Commission authority and changes in what constitutes a variance. The
AMM interceded and helped cause a delay in action until 1989.
TRUTH IN TAXATION. A new gimmick found in the 1988 Tax Law
patterned after a Florida law is unworkable as passed. The Revenue
Committee will review this issue and make recommendations to the
membership on whether it should be opposed supported, modified to
work ad/or pushed as a trade off for levy limits.
Discussion to date has already centered on the advisability of
cities opposing 'truthfulness'. This may be one of those issues where
you are doomed if you do and doomed if you don't.
TAX INCREMENT FINANCING. Last year was supposed to be the year
of non controversial fixing for some minor problems. It turned into
a donnybrook requiring a significant effort to stave off real
inroads in TIF useability. Next year promises to be even more
difficult since the authors in both houses have promised to look at
TIF microscopically and to eliminate its 'many abuses'.
PROPERTY TAX. This is a generic term that encompasses many
subissues such as Levy Limits, Homestead Credit, Local Government
Aids, Special Levies, etc. AMM committee members are faced with the
task of determining if Homestead Credit as we know it or with an
increased circuit breaker program must be preserved or can it be
replaced by an 'aid' program? Levy Limits have become more
restrictive regardless of the state revenue situation. How much
longer can cities exist at current levels? Can trade offs be made
for more public information an involvement? These and other revenue
issues will be discussed at length.
METRO OUTSTATE FUNDING SHIFTS. Recent years have seen an increasing
imblance of state revenue collection (64% of total from metro area
in 1986) to state aid and credit distribution (46% total to metro
area in 1986). These percentages are widening at an ever increasing
rate through school aid changes, Local aid program changes, the
Greater Minnesota Corporation funding, etc. The AMM will be
investigating policy to slow or reverse the increasing imbalance.
AIRPORT. The need for an expanded or new airport and possible
location of a new airport is going to be a major topic in the
metropolitan areas in the next 1few years. The AMM has been
requested by members to look into the issue . Given its magnitude
and controversial nature, it probably, will not be solved this
year but studies and discussion will begin.
DISTRIBUTION NOTE:
This Bulletin has been mailed to Mayors, Delegates and
Managers/Administrators only. Please distribute to other
officials in your city as you deem appropriate.
MEMO TO: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES
FROM: ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT HOHENSTEIN
DATE: AUGUST 9, 1988
SUBJECT: DAKOTA COUNTY LANDFILL SURCHARGE INCREASE
You recently forwarded the attached memorandum concerning the
proposed increase in the Dakota County Landfill Surcharge Fee. I
have returned it to you with a comment as it has some direct
impacts on decisions the City may make regarding landfill
abatement. The primary purpose for the surcharge is to raise
money to support recycling and other landfill abatement programs
in Dakota County. The ten fold increase will dramatically
enhance the County's revenue position. As a direct result,
however, it will force up individual hauling costs as haulers
transfer their increased cost of doing business to the homeowner.
While the incremental cost to the homeowner is anticipated to be
slight, it does imply that Eagan homeowners will contribute to
this fund with every ton of waste produced. Therefore, it
behooves the City to take advantage of as much of the Dakota
County landfill abatement money as soon as possible so that local
homeowners are not subsidizing other programs rather than our
own. This does not diminish my firm contention that the City
needs to focus on a user fee structure to offset the costs of a
recycling program and to financially reinforce the concept of
waste abatement. I will share this information also with the
Solid Waste Abatement Commission. If you have any questions
concerning it, please let me know.
Attachments
JDH/jeh
MEMORANDUM
DAKOTA COUNTY PUBLIC HEALTH DEPARTMENT
HUMAN SERVICES DIVISION
DAKOTA COUNTY NORTHERN SERVICE CENTER
33 EAST WENTWORTH AVENUE
WEST ST. PAUL, MN 55118
(612) 450-2608
DATE: July 29, 1988
TO:
City/Township Officials, Solid Waste Haulers,
Licensed Solid Waste Facilities, and Interested
Parties
FROM: Donna M. Anderson, Public Health Directortf
SUBJECT: Proposed Amendments to Dakota County Ordinance No.
110, Solid Waste Management: Solid Waste Surcharge
Fee
The Dakota County Board of Commissioners has set a Public Hearing
to receive comments on proposed amendments to County Ordinance
No. 110, Solid Waste Management. These amendments would increase
the solid waste surcharge fee imposed at each sanitary landfill
in the County from 25 cents to $2.62 per cubic yard, effective
September 1, 1988. The Hearing date, time, and place is:
Tuesday, August 16, 1988
9:00 a.m.
Board Room, Dakota County Government Center
Hastings, MN
A copy of the proposed ordinance amendments and a statement of
rationale are enclosed.
If you are unable to attend the Public Hearing, you may submit
written or oral comments directed to Jeff Harthun, Lead
Worker/Solid Waste Management (450-2745) or me (450-2608). All
comments received will be presented to the County Board.
Enclosures
n9\
SEAAM:NgNP OF RATIONALE
PROPOSED AMEN:ME PS PO DARIDTA canary'
ORDINANCE N O. 110, SOLID WA.S'IE mmvisEmEar
The new state law to lift the solid waste surcharge fee cap, effective August
1, 1988, provides the Dakota County Board of Commissioners an opportunity to
address policy issues in the solid waste management area. After thoughtful
discussion, the County Board has proposed to amend its Solid Waste Management
Ordinance to increase the solid waste surcharge fee imposed at each sanitary
landfill in the County from 25 cents to $2.62 per cubic yard, effective
September 1, 1988. In this proposal, the County Board anticipates increasing
the amount of funds available to Dakota County for its waste abatement and
remediation/cleanup activities and doubling the amount of funds available to
other metropolitan counties to continue to help support their abatement
programming.
A combination of factors influenced the County Board's decision-making. The
rationale is based on the following considerations.
Shared Responsibility. The Board believes that it is good public policy that
those who generate the solid waste should pay for its disposal and associated
environmental costs. They also believe that it is appropriate that surcharge
collecting counties - Dakota, Anoka, Scott, Hennepin - raise revenue to
address their responsibilities in this area.
Primary Location for Disposal. Over the past fifty (50) years, Dakota County
has been a primary location in the metropolitan area for disposal of
substantial amounts of mixed municipal refuse, industrial wastes, and
hazardous wastes. During the past five (5) years, approximately 50% of the
mixed municipal solid waste generated in the metropolitan area has been
consistently deposited in licensed sanitary landfills in Dakota County. Less
than 20% of the waste is generated by Dakota residents. These disposal
practices have resulted in known and suspected contamination of groundwater
supplies throughout the County.
Landfill Capacity. Because Flying Cloud Sanitary Landfill in Hennepin County
has closed temporarily, more solid waste is now diverted to landfills in
Dakota County. As a result, the existing capacity of these landfills is being
used at a faster rate than previously projected. If these practices continue,
it may be necessary to site and construct an additional landfill at great
expense that would not have been needed if other counties were not diverting
their waste to Dakota County.
Long -Term Cleanup Issues. Dakota County has been inheriting long-term cleanup
problems without long-term solutions. Although all four sanitary landfills
are on the federal or state superfund lists for remedial investigation of
groundwater contamination and cleanup actions, federal or state funding is
uncertain. Because of the high volume of waste received, Dakota County needs
to be in a strong position to perform contingency actions at licensed and
unlicensed solid waste disposal sites. While the County Board believes that
responsible parties should contribute to these extensive remedial actions and
cleanup costs, it is unlikely that all costs can be fully secured or
recovered.
acb
Proposed Agents to
Dakota County Ordinance No. 110, Solid Waste Management
SECTION IV. SOLID WASTE SURCHARGE
This section is adopted pursuant to the authorization contained within Minn.
Stat. 115A.919.
Subsection 1. Fee on Operators of Disposal Facilities. There is imposed a
fee on operators of facilities which accept and dispose of mixed municipal
solid waste in the County of Dakota. All vehicles transporting solid waste
shall be registered at the entrance of the waste facility.
Subsection 2. Amount of Fee. The fee shall be t..__*+ ±ve eents ($.25) two
dollars and sixty-two cents ($2.62) per gate yard of all solid waste accepted
at the gate and disposed of at a facility for mixed municipal solid waste
located in the County of Dakota. All vehicles transporting solid waste shall
be registered at the entrance of the waste facility. Charges for passenger
cars and pick-up trucks shall be in accordance with the rules promulgated by
the Minnesota Commissioner of.Revenue pursuant to the Metropolitan Landfill
Abatement Act and shall be prorated in accordance with the ratio between the
State fee and the County fee.
Subsection 3. Partial Exemption From Fee. Waste residue from energy and
resource recovery facilities at which solid waste is processed for the
purposes of extracting, reducing, converting to energy, or otherwise
separating and preparing solid waste for reuse shall be exempt frau one-half
the amount of the fee imposed if there is at least an eighty-five percent
(85%) volume reduction in the solid waste processed. To qualify for exemption
under this clause, waste residue must be brought to the facility separately.
Before any fee is reduced, the verification procedures of Section 73,
Subdivision 1, Paragraph (c), of Minnesota Laws 1984, Chapter 644, must be
followed and submitted to the Department.
Subsection 4. Limited Exemption for Metal Casting Facilities. For the
period January 1, 1985, through December 31, 1987, non -hazardous solid waste
from metal casting facilities shall not be subject to the fee imposed by this
section, provided such waste is brought to the disposal facility separately.
The operator must return to the Department a statement of exemption with its
monthly return for all wastes exempted pursuant to this subsection. Such
statement of exemption shall be in the form provided by the Minnesota
Commissioner of Revenue.
Subsection 5. Exemption for Cover Material and Lining. When solid waste
that is accepted at a mixed municipal solid waste facility is not disposed of
in the body of the facility, but is used in the operation of the facility as
cover or lining material, the solid waste may be exempt frau the amount of the
fee charged. The generator of waste qualifying for this exemption must first
obtain written approval frau the Department as to the suitability of material
for cover material or lining.
Subsection 6. Returns, Fee Payment and Reporting Requirements.
A. Time for Payment of Fee to County. The fee imposed by this subsection
shall be due and payable by the operator of the facility to the County
of Dakota monthly on or before the twentieth day of the month
immediately following the month in which the solid waste was received at
the facility.
over
B. Returns. Any operator subject to the fee imposed by this subsection
shall file a return prescribed by the Department. The return must be
signed by the operator or by a person authorized by the operator to do
so. The return shall be filed with the Department on or before the
twentieth day of the month immediately following the month in which the
solid waste was received at the facility and must be accompanied by
payment of the fee.
C. Extensions. The Department may extend for reasonable cause the time for
filing returns and remittance of fees for not more than sixty (60)
days. The Department may require a tentative return at the time fixed
for filing the regularly required return and payment of the fee
therewith on the basis of such estimated return.
D. Reporting requirements. The monthly return required to be filed shall
be reported in cubic yards. If the facility measures in tons, the
operator shall use the conversion factor set forth in Section 1,
Subsection 15. The monthly return shall show: (a) amount of solid
waste accepted and disposed of at the facility and (b) amount of fee due
on the return computed by multiplying the total cubic yards times
twenty five eents 4$ + two dollars and sixty-two cents ($2.62); and
(c) amount of cubic yards received which is fully or partially exempt
from the fee imposed by this section and; (d) such other information as
may be required by the Department in order to administer this section.
E. Failure to File Return. If any operator required to file any return
shall fail to do so within the time prescribed by this subsection or
shall make, willfully or otherwise, an incorrect, false or fraudulent
return, such operator, upon written notice and demand, shall immediately
file such return or corrected return and at the time pay any fee due on
the basis thereof. If such operator shall fail to file such return or
corrected return, the Department may make for the operator a return, or
corrected return, frau its knowledge and from such information as the
Department can obtain through testimony or otherwise and assess a fee on
the basis thereof, which fee (less any partial payments for the fee
covered by such return) shall be immediately paid upon written notice
and demand. Any such return or assessment made by the Department shall
be prima facie correct and valid and such operator shall have the burden
of establishing its incorrectness or invalidity in any action or
proceeding in respect thereto. Nothing in this paragraph shall preclude
the County of Dakota from enforcing this subsection by pursuing any
other remedy authorized by law or ordinance.
F. Records. Every operator of a sanitary landfill in which mixed municipal
solid waste is accepted and disposed of shall keep adequate and complete
records showing the total cubic yards of solid waste accepted and
disposed of at the facility for each day, in the form prescribed by the
Minnesota Commissioner of Revenue under rule promulgated pursuant to the
Metropolitan Landfill Abatement Act Minn. Stat. § 473.842 - 473.847).
G. Examination of Records. The County or its designated agent shall have
the right to examine records and accounts of the operator required to
file a return.
Subsection 7. EFFECTIVE DATE. This section shall be effective on germany
17 1985 September 1, 1988.
EAGAN FIRE DEPARTMENT
MONTHLY REPORT FOR April, 1988
TYPE WORK PERFORMED MAN HOURS
Fire/Rescue 1,943
Training 809
Truck & Equipment Maint. 179
Station Maintenance 201
Fire Prevention 88
Administrative 696
TOTAL 3,916
MANPOWER STATION #1 STATION #2 STATION #3
Available Nights 16 14 19
Available Days 5 8 4
Available Days & Nights 5 4 4
Available Rotating 3 1 3
On Leave 0 2 0
Rookies 0 0 0
TOTAL 29 29 30
FIRE/RESCUE TYPE NUMBER $ LOSS
Structure 11
Grass 16
Vehicle 5
False 10
Medical 3
Other 6
TOTAL 51
LARGE DOLLAR LOSSES
DATE NAME LOCATION OCCUPANCY $ LOSS
TYPE WORK PERFORMED
Fire/Rescue
Training
EAGAN FIRE DEPARTMENT
MONTHLY REPORT FOR May, 1988
MAN HOURS
914
762
Truck & Equipment Maint. 159
Station Maintenance
Fire Prevention
Administrative
TOTAL
117
54
525
2,531
MANPOWER STATION #1 STATION #2 STATION #3
Available Nights 16 14 19
Available Days 5 8 4
Available Days & Nights 5 4 4
Available Rotating 3 1 3
On Leave 0 2 0
Rookies 0 0 0
TOTAL 29 29 30
FIRE/RESCUE TYPE NUMBER $ LOSS
Structure 8 85,000
Grass 5
Vehicle 8
False 22
Medical 7
Other 6
TOTAL
LARGE DOLLAR LOSSES
56 85,000
DATE NAME LOCATION OCCUPANCY $ LOSS
05/12/88
2091 Silver Bell Apartments $85,000
F -Monthly -Report 11/87
EAGAN FIRE DEPARTMENT
MONTHLY REPORT FOR June, 1988
TYPE WORK PERFORMED
Fire/Rescue
Training
Truck & Equipment Maznt.
Station Maintenance
Fire Prevention
Administrative
MAN HOURS
1,557
631
159
118
42
589
TOTAL 3,096
MANPOWER STATION #1 STATION #2 STATION #3
Available Nights 16 14 19
Available Days 5 8 4
Available Days & Nights 5 4 4
Available Rotating 3 1 3
On Leave 0 2 0
Rookies 0 0 0
TOTAL 29 29 30
FIRE/RESCUE TYPE NUMBER $ LOSS
Structure 5
Grass 18
Vehicle 7 1,500
False 6
Medical 5
Other 12
TOTAL
LARGE DOLLAR LOSSES
1,500
DATE NAME LOCATION OCCUPANCY $ LOSS
06/14/88
Johnny Cake & Cliff Car
2,o5
$ 1,500
F -Monthly -Report 11/87
DAKOTA COUNTY
DAKOTA COUNTY
HOUSING &
REDEVELOPMENT
AUTHORITY
2496 - 145th STREET WEST
ROSEMOUNT, MINNESOTA 55068
612-423-4800
Serving People and Communities
TO:
MEMORANDUM
HRA Commissioners; Dakota County Commissioners; City
Managers; Lyle D. Wray, County Administrator; and
Dakota County Planning Department
FROM: Mark S. Ulfers, Executive Director
SUBJECT: STATUS REPORT FOR ASSISTED HOUSING AND COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT
DATE: August 4, 1988
Enclosed is the July Status Report for all Assisted Housing
Programs and Community Development Programs currently being
operated in your community and a summary sheet for Dakota County.
If you would like to also receive reports on other Dakota County
communities, please call Lori Zierden of our staff.
Enclosures
"AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER"
ASSISTED HOUSING
Status Report for Dakota County**
July, 1988
Amount
of
Elderly Family Total (+/-)*
Section 8 Existing:
Certificates 376 1,183 1,559 +15
Vouchers 80 189 269 +70
Moderate Rehab 4 21 25 0
Section 8 New Construction 247 300 547 0
Low Rent Housing 380 200 580 +10
235 Home 0 41 41 0
236 Rental 0 526 526 0
TOTAL ASSISTED HOUSING 1,087 2,460 3,547 +95
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
Amount
Commercial/ of
Elderly Family Multifamily Total Increase
MHFA Local Participation 0 3 0 3 0
MHFA Home Improvement Loan 33 170 0 203 2
MHFA Home Rehab Loan 63 76 0 139 0
MHFA Home Energy Loan 10 124 0 134 0
Rental Rehab 38 49 5 92 0
CDBG Rehab Loan 87 161 0 248 0
CDBG Rehab Loan - Mobile Home 1 20 0 21 0
MHFA Solar Bank Energy Loan 0 8 0 8 0
312 Loan - Residential 4 15 0 19 0
312 Loan - Commercial/
Mixed Use N/A N/A 3 3 0
Weatherization 360 1,431 0 1,791 11
TOTAL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 596 2,057 8 2,661 13
* + = Increase/- = Decrease
**
Numbers for the City of South St. Paul are included in
Assisted Housing, Rental Rehab, and Weatherization, but are
excluded from the rest of the Community Development programs;
South St. Paul operates separate Community Development
programs.
Status Report for the City of Eagan
July, 1988
Amount
of
ASSISTED HOUSING Elderly Family Total (+/-)*
Section 8 Existing:
Certificates 37 236 273 +4
Vouchers 19 55 74 -3
Section 8 New Construction 0 33 33 0
Low Rent Housing 0 18 18 +1
236 Rental 0 144 144 0
TOTAL ASSISTED HOUSING 56 486 542 +2
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
Amount
of
Elderly Family Total Increase
MHFA Home Improvement Loan 2 13 15 0
MHFA Home Rehab Loan 3 3 6 0
MHFA Home Energy Loan 1 10 11 0
CDBG Rehab Loan 1 4 5 0
Weatherization 5 66 71 0
TOTAL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 12
* + = Increase/- = Decrease
96 108
0
As the Park Committee requested it As the City Clerk Ordered it
As the Council designed it
As the'City installed it
As the Engineers approved it
What the children wanted
ADMINISTRATIVE AGENDA
REGULAR MEETING
EAGAN CITY COUNCIL
AUGUST 16, 1988
CITY ATTORNEY
CITY ADMINISTRATOR
Item 1. Eagan vs Carlson
Item 2. Special Permit for General Pump to Locate a Mobile Office Unit
Item 3. Cliff Lake Centre Sign Plan
Item 4. Proposal for Median Cut and County Road 30/Blackhawk Plaza
Project
DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS
Item 1. Project 473, Receive Final Assessment Roll/Order Public
Hearing (Pilot Knob Road - Trunk Storm Sewer)
Item 2. Project 485, Receive Final Assessment Roll/Order Public
Hearing (Northview Park Road - Streets & Utilities)
Item 3. Project 491, Receive Final Assessment Roll/Order Public
Hearing (Eagan Hills Farms - Streets & Utilities)
Item 4. Project 496, Receive Final Assessment Roll/Order Public
Hearing (Brittany 10th Addition - Trunk Storm Sewer)
Item 5. Project 498, Receive Final Assessment Roll/Order Public
Hearing (Stafford Place - Streets & Utilities)
Item 6. Project 494, Receive Final Assessment Roll/Order Public
Hearing (East Wescott Road - Streets & Utilities)
Item 7. Project 500, Receive Final Assessment Roll/Order Public
Hearing (Eagan Royale/Briar Oaks - Trunk Utilities)
Item 8. Project 506, Receive Final Assessment Roll/Order Public
Hearing (Parkcliff 2nd Addition - Storm Sewer)
Item 9. Project 516, Receive Final Assessment Roll/Order Public
Hearing (Gopher Eagan 2nd Addition - Streets & Utilities)
Item 10. Project 517, Receive Final Assessment Roll/Order Public
Hearing (St. Francis Woods 6th Addition _ Streets & Utilities)
MEMO TO: HONORABLE MAYOR & CITY COUNCILMEMBERS
FROM: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES
DATE: AUGUST 15, 1988
SUBJECT: ADMINISTRATIVE AGENDA
CITY ATTORNEY
There are no formal items scheduled under City Attorney; however,
this item is reserved for questions, comments or executive
session to advise City Council on lawsuits, personnel matters or
other legal issues.
CITY ADMINISTRATOR
Item 1. Eagan vs Carlson --At the last regular City Council
meeting, action was taken to not appeal the court's decision on
the Eagan vs Carlson condemnation. At that time, the total
amount of the judgment was not known. Dave Keller, of Hauge,
Eide and Keller, who represented the City on this case has
received the final dollar amounts and that information is now
available for Council review.
It is the recommendation of Mr. Keller that the Council authorize
payment of $16,993 to cover interest, the balance of the
judgment and costs andisbursements. Enclosed and referenced as
pages 7.--/( through -/' is a copy of his letter and appropriate
attachments. Our City Attorney, Jim Sheldon, has received a copy
of this information, is evaluating the final payment request and
will be available for any comments at the meeting on Tuesday.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny Council
authorization of payment in the amount of $16,993 to finalize the
Eagan vs Carlson case.
Item 2. Special Permit for General Pump to Locate a Mobile
Office Unit --General Pump, located at 3380 Highway 149, is
requesting a special permit to locate a mobile office unit as a
temporary office. The Planning Department has prepared a report,
a copy is enclosed on page(s) -/5 - 7-Z/ for your review.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny a
special permit for General Pump to locate a mobile office unit at
3380 Highway 149 to be used as a temporary office.
Item 3. Cliff Lake Centre Sign Plan --A sign plan for Cliff Lake
Centre was received by the City May 17, 1988. Certain signs were
approved for Cub Foods and Target Stores; however, the overall
sign plan was continued so further review could be conducted.
That review has been completed by City staff and it is
recommended that the overall sign plan for freestanding pylons,
freestanding ground sigp and building signage be reviewed for
Council consideration. (p. `Z2 Z - ZZFS')
This item was not scheduled for the regular agenda; however,
according to the Planning Department, the master sign plan should
be considered at this City Council meeting and therefore the item
was added to the Administrative Agenda.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the
Cliff Lake Centre master sign plan.
Item 4. Proposal for Median Cut and County Road 30/Blackhawk
Plaza Project --Mr. Luther Stalland, representing Norse
Development Company is requesting a time on the agenda to request
a signalized left turn access from eastbound Diffley Road into
Blackhawk Plaza. Apparently, a left turn from the shopping
center to Diffley Road would not be allowed. The City
Administrator had suggested that this item be referred to the
Engineering Department and considered as a formal item on the
September 6 agenda; however, Mr. Stalland indicated that the City
Council had been contacted and was agreeable to hearing this item
as an additional item at the August 16, meeting. The City
Administrator has asked the Assistant City Engineer, Mike
Foertsch, to review this matter with SEH prior to our meeting
tomorrow evening. Enclosed is a memo from BRW and various
letters supporting Mr. Stalland's request fora median cut
allowing a left hand turn movement. (F. ?-19
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: 1) To refer this matter
back to the Engineering Department for further study or 2) to
approve or deny a recommendation to the Dakota County Highway
Department requesting consideration by the County to provide a
signalized left turn access from eastbound Diffley Road into
Blackhawk Plaza.
DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS
Item 1. Project 473, Receive Final Assessment Roll/Order
Public Hearing (Pilot Knob Road - Trunk Storm Sewer) --A11 costs
associated with the installation of trunk storm sewer under this
project have been tabulated and the final assessment roll
prepared in anticipation of scheduling the final assessment
hearing necessary to finance this project.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To receive the final
assessment roll for Project 473, (Pilot Knob Road - Trunk Storm
Sewer) and schedule the final assessment hearing to be held
September 19, 1988.
Item 2. Project 485, Receive Final Assessment Roll/Order Public
Hearing (Northview Park Road -- Streets & Utilities) --All costs
associated with the installation of streets and utilities under
this project have been tabulated and the final assessment roll
prepared in anticipation of scheduling the final assessment
hearing necessary to finance this project.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To receive the final
assessment roll for Project 485, (Northview Park Road -- Streets
& Utilities) and schedule the final assessment hearing to be held
September 19, 1988.
Item 3. Project 491, Receive Final Assessment Roll/Order Public
Hearing (Eagan Hills Farms - Streets & Utilities) --A11 costs
associated with the installation of streets and utilities under
this project have been tabulated and the final assessment roll
prepared in anticipation of scheduling the final assessment
hearing necessary to finance this project.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To receive the final
assessment roll for Project 491, (Eagan Hills Farms - Streets
& Utilities) and schedule the final assessment hearing to be held
September 19, 1988.
Item 4. Project 496, Receive Final Assessment Roll/Order Public
Hearing (Brittany 10th Addition - Trunk Storm Sewer) --All costs
associated with the installation of trunk storm sewer under this
project have been tabulated and the final assessment roll
prepared in anticipation of scheduling the final assessment
hearing necessary to finance this project.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To receive the final
assessment roll for Project 496, (Brittany 10th Addition -
Trunk Storm Sewer) and schedule the final assessment hearing to
be held September 19, 1988.
Item 5. Project 498, Receive Final Assessment Roll/Order Public
Hearing (Stafford Place - Streets & Utilities) --All costs
associated with the installation of streets and utilities under
this project have been tabulated and the final assessment roll
prepared in anticipation of scheduling the final assessment
hearing necessary to finance this project.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To receive the final
assessment roll for Project 498, (Stafford Place - Streets &
Utilities) and schedule the final assessment hearing to be held
September 19, 1988.
Item 6. Project 494, Receive Final Assessment Roll/Order Public
Hearing (East Wescott Road - Streets & Utilities) --All costs
associated with the installation of streets and utilities under
this project have been tabulated and the final assessment roll
prepared in anticipation of scheduling the final assessment
hearing necessary to finance this project.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To receive the final
assessment roll for Project 494, (East Wescott Road - Streets
& Utilities) and schedule the final assessment hearing to be held
September 19, 1988.
Item 7. Project 500, Receive Final Assessment Roll/Order Public
Hearing (Eagan Royale/Briar Oaks - Trunk Utilities) --A11 costs
associated with the installation of trunk utilities under this
project have been tabulated and the final assessment roll
prepared in anticipation of scheduling the final assessment
hearing necessary to finance this project.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To receive the final
assessment roll for Project 500, (Eagan Royale/Briar Oaks -
Trunk Utilities) and schedule the final assessment hearing to be
held September 19, 1988.
Item 8. Project 506, Receive Final Assessment Roll/Order Public
Hearing (Parkcliff 2nd Addition - Storm Sewer) --All costs
associated with the installation of storm sewer under this
project have been tabulated and the final assessment roll
prepared in anticipation of scheduling the final assessment
hearing necessary to finance this project.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To receive the final
assessment roll for Project 506, (Parkcliff 2nd Addition -
Storm Sewer) and schedule the final assessment hearing to be held
September 19, 1988.
Item 9. Project 516, Receive Final Assessment Roll/Order Public
Hearing (Gopher Eagan 2nd Addition - Streets & Utilities) --All
costs associated with the installation of streets and utilities
under this project have been tabulated and the final assessment
roll prepared in anticipation of scheduling the final assessment
hearing necessary to finance this project.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To receive the final
assessment roll for Project 516, (Gopher Eagan 2nd Addition -
Streets & Utilities) and schedule the final assessment hearing to
be held September 19, 1988.
Item 10. Project 517, Receive Final Assessment Roll/Order Public
Hearing (St. Francis Woods 6th Addition - Streets & Utilities) --
All costs associated with the installation of streets and
utilities under this project have been tabulated and the final
assessment roll prepared in anticipation of scheduling the final
assessment hearing necessary to finance this project.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To receive the final
assessment roll for Project 517, (St. Francis Woods 6th
Addition - Streets & Utilities) and schedule the final assessment
hearing to be held September 19, 1988.
HAUGE, EIDE & KELLER, P.A.
Allorneys ul -C atv
TOWN CENTRE PROFESSIONAL BLDG., SUITE 200
1260 YANKEE DOODLE ROAD
EAGAN, MINNESOTA 55123
(612) 456-9000
FAX 454-4232
August 11, 1.988
Mr. Thomas Hedges
City Administrator
Eagan City Hall
RE: Eagan v. Carlson
Dear Mr. Hedges:
PAULH HAUGE
KEVIN W. EIDE
DAVID G KELLER
LORI M. BELLIN
DEBRA E. SCHMIDT
THOMAS P LOWE
Enclosed please find a copy of a demand from the Carlsons' attorney
regarding the above -captioned action.
It is our understanding that the City Council moved to not appeal
the Court's decision if the owner did not appeal. The owner did not
appeal.
The request correctly indicates the amounts paid by the City toward
the judgment, leaving a balance of $12,285.00. The interest is
computed at 3% from December 15, 1986, (the quick -take date) to
August 16, 1988, on the $12,285.00 and up to October, 1987, on the
$21,050.00.
$300.00 per day expert witness fees is allowable under Rule 11 of
the Code of Rules for the District Courts (Connelly and Foutchis).
$500.00 is required for appraiser's fees under MSA 5117 for services
up to and including the Commissioners' hearing. The Carlsons are
requesting an additional $500.00 for their appraiser's time in
preparation for and testimony at trial. Again, the rules allow up
to $300.00. Considering the outcome of the case, we think the Court
would award at least a total of $800.00. Carlsons would settle for
$1,000.00. Their appraiser billed them $1,710.00.
The purpose of the request by the Carlsons is to avoid a Court
hearing where they would demand $3,008.00 of interest and $2,410.00
of costs and disbursements, in addition to the $12,285.00 balance on
the judgment. The total would be $17,703.00.
Page Two
Mr. Thomas Hedges
August 11, 1988
Our recommendation would be that the Council authorize payment of
$16,993.00 for the following: interest - $3,008.00; balance of
judgment - $12,285.00; and costs and disbursements - $1,700.00
($1,000.00 for appraiser's fees). It does not appear that a Court
hearing to argue reductions of the $300.00 fees for Commissioners
Connelly and Foutchis along with the proposed $500.00 for the
appraiser would be cost effective and could result in an even higher
award for the appraiser's fees.
DGS{: cam
Enclosure
cc: James Sheldon
Very truly yours,
HAUGF, EIDE & KELLER, P.A.
David G. Keller
2(�
DAVID L. GRAtixis - 1874.1961
DAVID L. GRANNIE. JR - 1910.1980
VANCE B. GRANNIS
VANCE B. GRANNIE, JR.
PATRICK A. FARRELL
DAVID L. GR.ANN15, ia1
ROGER N. KN-L,TsoN
LAW OFFICES
GxANNIs, GRANNIS, FARRELL & KNvrSON
PROFESSIONAL AaaocIATION
Posy OYTIa Box 57
403OANIFEST BANK BUILDING
161 NORTH CONCORD EXCHANGE
souni ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA 55075
Mr. David Keller
Attorney at Law
1260 Yankee Doodle
Eagan, MN 55123
TAFp oNE (612) 455-1661
August 11, 1988
Road, No. 200
Re: City of Eagan vs. Albert Carlson,
Court File No. C1-87-104870
;year Mr. Keller:
et al
The following is a summary of the information I
this morning:
T
as
$40,635.00
7,300.00
21,050.00
$12,285.00
3,008.00
$15,293.00
addition
follows:
- Verdict
- Less quick take
- Less 3/4th's payment
- Interest on verdict
to the above amounts
10.00
30.00
60.00
300.00
300.00
1,710.00
$ 2,410.00
$17 703.00
TE'i. ECOPIER
(612)455-2359
DAVID L. MAR/OYER
Eu orr B, KNE•rSCri
MICHAEL J. MAYER
TLmOTHY J. BERG
discussed with you
we claim costs and disbursements
- Statutory costs
- Jury Fee
-- Court Administrator's Fees
- Ray Connelly (witness fees)
- James Foutchis (witness fees)
- Thomas Metzen (witness and appraisal
- Total Costs and disbursements
- Total due
fees)
As we discussed, the award form that you used did not include a
dollar amount for appraisal fees at the commission level. It is my
opinion that if we presented Metzen's fees to the Court and the fact
that we had not been awarded appraisal fees through the commission
stage, that we would be awarded at least $1,000 and possibly more.
I am willing, however, to settle that issue for $1,000 at this time.
7(6
Mr. David Keller
August 11, 1988
Page 2
In the event that it is necessary to tax costs, I wi11 be
requesting the full amount from the Court.
You have indicated that you will advise me this morning whether
you will settle on this basis so we can have the matter approved
at the August 16 Eagan City Council meeting.
Very truly yours,
GRANNIS, GRANNIS, FARRELL
& KNUTSON
vl
CITY OF EAGAN
SUBJECT: SPECIAL PERMIT
APPLICANT: GENERAL PUMP
LOCATION: 3380 HIGHWAY 149
EXISTING ZONING: LIMITED INDUSTRIAL
DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: AUGUST 16, 1988
DATE OF REPORT: AUGUST 8, 1988
REPORTED BY: PLANNING DEPARTMENT
APPLICATION SUMMARY
The applicant, General Pump, is requesting a special permit to
locate a mobile office unit at 3380 Highway 149 to be used as a
temporary office.
COMMENTS
Due to the expansion of their business, General Pump is planning
on remodeling and/or expanding their present offices and would
like to have a 12 ft. x 50 ft. trailer put on their property to
be used as a temporary office for a minimum of four months and a
maximum of eight months. The trailer will be located near the
northwest corner of the existing building.
If approved, the special permit shall be subject to the following
conditions:
1. Building plans must be submitted and meet all applicable
state building codes and a City building permit shall be
obtained.
2. The trailer must meet the setback and lot coverage
requirements and all other applicable code requirements.
3. Decorative skirting must be installed around the base of the
trailer.
4. The permit shall be limited to two years.
N Ol ld TJ0l 3?43.10 C13H01134
0
0
1
9
a
0
1
4
.s'n ,mnd -1d']NB`�
'i
_o
H
o C
m
Z!1
a
41.
0
0
ldwna -1483N3h
GENERAL PUMP • U.S.
August 4, 1988
Property owners within 200 feet:
Minnesota Fence and Iron Works
3350 Highway 149
Eagan, Mn 55121
Phone: 454-8835
L -c-
3380 Hwy 149 o Eagan, MN 55121 • 612-454-6500 • TELEX: 5106000432 G PUMP STP • CABLE: GENPUMP
J L
ray kjF_ i ♦ C� 'C�
1106 777O1.; ST. VEST
.741,1141WINGTON, MN x55024
AUGUST 3, 1988
GENERAL PUMP
3380 HwY, 149
EAGAN, MN, 55121
ATT: MR. MIKE CHRISTOPHERSON
DEAR MIKE;
PER OUR TELEPHONE CONVERSATION THIS A. M.,
WE HAVE NO OBJECTION TO YOUR REQUEST TO PLACE A MOBILE
OFFICE, APPROXIMATE SIZE 12 FT. BY 50 FT., ON YOUR
LEASED PROPERTY FOR A PERIOD NOT EXCEED ONE YEAR.
ANY DAMAGE DONE TO THE BUILDING, GROUNDS, BLACK
TOP, ETC, AS A RESULT OF THIS PROJECT, WOULD BE
YOUR RESPONSIBILITY TO REPAIR OR REPLACE.
YOURS TRULY
;`-! 1 I ,`l«,
,' / /:2`,7-),:-./_-,,_ L.
GAYLE R. BROD I'L
_LID PRODUCTS
2385 So. Hwv. 149
Eagan, Minnesota 55121-2395
August 5, 1988
To Whom it May Concern;
9
Please be advised that Gopher Smelting has no objections to the placement of a
mobile office near the building currently rented by General Pump. However we
expect that any and all permits be the responsibility of General Pump and that
any and all repairs and modifications be at their sole expense.
Also, it will be the responsibility of General Pump to repair the premises to
its present condition and any and all expenses are the sole responsibility of
General Pump.
Sincerely,
Mark Kutoff
GENERAL PUMP • U.S.
July 22, 1988
Mr. Dale Runkle
City Planner
Eagan City Hall
3830 Pilot Knob Road
Eagan, MN 55122
Dear Mr. Runkle,
This is to confirm our conversation this afternoon regarding a permit to temporarily park a trailer on our
property. Our need to do this is created by some very positive business situations, e.g. growth,
expansion and reorganization.
We are currently talking with contractors about remodeling and/or expanding our present facilities. Our
planning committee has met several times and is very close to making a decision as to the best course of
action to take.
It is critical we continue to service our customers and to provide room during remodeling. Therefore, the
committee feels that leasing a trailer approximately --1-0'-x-48' for a brief period of time is the best alternative
available. � a
We have looked at several types of trailers and are concerned that both external and internal appearances
remain consistent with the positive image we have always maintained in Eagan.
The period of the permit we feel would give us sufficient time for good decision making would be a
minimum of four months and a maximum of eight.
Thank your for your assistance in this matter. If there are any questions, please contact me.
Sincerely,
:•', ,._,Z, le. t ,:.•C•
Gordon Baird
General Pump/U.S.
Z�/
3380 Hwy 149 • Eagan, MN 55121 • 612-454-6500 • TELEX: 5106000432 G PUMP STP • CABLE: GENPUMP
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
MEMORANDUM
Dale Runkle, City Planner
Shannon Willey, Zoning Administrator
August 10, 1988
Cliff Lake Centre Sign Plan
The sign plan for Cliff Lake Centre was received by the City May
17, 1988. At the May 16, 1988 City Council meeting Mr. Bill
McHale requested the pylons for Cub Foods and Target Stores be
approved. Approval was given for the two signs, however the
overall sign plan was continued so further review could be
conducted.
City Code requires that "...a pylon sign is allowed in lieu of a
free-standing ground sign." (Chapter 4, Subdivision 6B) The plan
for the Centre indicates three free-standing ground signs and
three pylons. The applicant is requesting more than the allowable
signage. A determination by the Council will be needed to
approve or deny the proposed plan with the excess free-standing
ground signs.
Also, for a major complex," such as a shopping center, up to one
free-standing or pylon sign be allowed for each major adjacent
street." This would allow the third pylon sign which has not had
any Council action yet. The major complex pylon sign is
permitted under Code and meets the pylon sign requirements.
It appears from the site plan of the Centre that there will be a
building mounted business sign on the east side of the Target
store. A clarification from the applicant regarding the location
of this sign should be made. The placement of this sign was not
noted on the specifications sheet, and is not a permitted
location.
Further review of this matter will occur at the August 16, 1988
City Council meeting.
Respectfully Submitted,
Shannon Willey
/attachments
ZZZ
46
FREESTANDING PYLON SIGNAGE
CITY ALLOWANCE
1 per buifdfng
27'0' 1 125 sq. tt.
300 frog. 11 othir pylons
1 udditlonal for mgr jot complex on udjs+ccint strvW t
1 siddition41 for t r u c w s y tae a t 1Pon
PROJECT REQUIREMENTS ,
Pylons - less th..n 125= rid 27'O height
1 1,1a jot Con pl e x 10 Py Ion t S' o0 1.,2 l
1 Tsrgvt P lon (S• * 003.2)
1 Cr oc ar y Py ion t S oe 002,21
2 Pyk>ns, pipt Out of • f u t urw
FREESTANDING GROUND SIGNAGE
CITY ALLOWANCE
. 1 per building
7.0' w..aY. height
41•0` v x. height of s. }n &tea
• 1o'ROJECT RECU!RE1PtENTS
3 Frvvstandinw Ground Sign — 7• hi. IS..r 001,3/
BUILDING SIGNAGE
CITY ALLOWANCE
• Grocery .: south side 20% of 5900 lar 1180
west siae 20'. of 4200:' of 1140:"
nitwit - south side 20% of 6000 ' at 1200:'
west side 20% of 7200.'of '1440
Major Complex 20% of 20,60011u 4120.1.
PROJECT REOUIREtMENTS
less than all allowed square footage
•
••
•
•
•
•
040
att
Wrl CC -4
'"•. C ti
to •� �_.. E ( +1
',.r1� 1 _ 1 o
I
01
n Wit)
•�,•/ 1 o
�S5 V L
,•. ✓ i . �� O -
_ M• 0 7
rW
J
0
a -
W
S !!b!
w 5fr n a a n�aoe 8
Q "+ Z '2gh
z - o:_h: oo-„- _
N ' g °Le.,
✓1 ra$ c S' NNooio„
z oa'0-9A, /- -'42 NN
.z {5 8 o'
} ��F' ?-`vfrYO CL PornV w
o u
2;-� � 4 Wig
il!Tilii
ZO¢53.-?t
�a-nn..Wi N< wn Z<t7 f 1W12
W„ 'z O W Q F
w ¢ w_
¢U a cu ♦ 5u u
6 6. . m
f i= t 1
I
it.• i ii
` i:l 1' ,
a j iii,.y .
F
= : : ' E + { i j r `1.. i F , .
I
i . I e - ! : : 3 i 6;;F: isi
O00000000000000000
{}
r •
ZZ�
Pr;,ject* L3451
Exterior—Tenant Wall Signage
NORSE DEVELOPMENT CO.
ONE co 5200 WEST 73rd STREET PLAZA
M MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55435 ,s
8-1-88
PROPOSAL FOR MEDIAN CUT ON COUNTY ROAD #30
BLACKHAWK PLAZA PROJECT
2zq
TELEPHONE
(612) 835-5577
CEL,111;it,
If 41
1_11 ._I
BENNETT. RINGROSE, WOLSFELO. JAITVIS. GARDNER INC. THRESHER SOUARE 700 THIRD STREET SOUTH • MINNEAPOLIS, MN 65415 • PHONE 6121370-0700
PLANNING
TRANSPORTATION
ENGINEERING
ARCHITECTURE
• .•c ..•
MEMORANDUM
DATE: July 27, 1988
TO: Dale Runkle
FROM: Richard Wolsfeld, PE
Erik Ruehr, PE
RE: Blackhawk Plaza Access
This memorandum is written on behalf of Blackhawk Plaza, Inc., regarding access
to the Blackhawk Plaza commercial center. Current access to Blackhawk Plaza is
provided via Blackhawk Road and a right turn only (in and out) driveway along
Diffley Road. A proposal has been made to provide signalized left turn access
from eastbound Diffley Road into Blackhawk Plaza; a left turn from the center to
Diffley Road would not be allowed. This memorandum has been written to address
the following questions regarding the proposed traffic signal:
o Is the proposed signal feasible?
o What is the estimated cost of the proposed signal?
In the following discussion of these issues, it is assumed that the need for a
traffic signal has been analyzed at the proposed location and that a decision
has been made that a traffic signal is warranted.
FEASIBILITY OF PROPOSED TRAFFIC SIGNAL
BRW's analysis indicates that a traffic signal is feasible at the proposed loca-
tion. If a traffic signal were installed, it is recommended that two phases be
provided: -
A
1. A through phase for traffic moving westbound on Diffley Road
2. A phase for left turns into and right turns out of Blackhawk Plaza
•
r,
MINNEAPOLIS
DENVER
PHOENIX
Dale Runkle
July 27, 1988
Page 2
Eastbound through movements would be allowed to proceed during both phases. An
example of this type of traffic signal operation is located at the interchange
of I -35E and TH 110 in Mendota Heights.
The feasibility of the proposed traffic signal has been analyzed in relation to
distance between adjacent signals and the effect of the proposed signal on
signal coordination along Diffley Road. The proposed signal would be located
approximately 600 feet east of the Diffley Road/Blackhawk Road intersection and
700 feet west of the Diffley Road/I-35E southbound ramps intersection. These
distances are sufficient to provide the necessary spacing between adjacent
signals.
In the analysis of signal coordination along Diffley Road, it has been assumed
that signals will ultimately exist at the intersections of Diffley Road with
Blackhawk Road, the Blackhawk Plaza access driveway, the I -35E southbound ramps,
and the I -35E northbound ramps. It is likely that coordination of these four
signals will be desired. The proposed Blackhawk Plaza signal will be easy to.
coordinate with the other three signals. Since only westbound traffic on
Diffley Road will be required to stop at the Blackhawk Plaza signal, this signhl
need only be coordinated with westbound movements along Diffley Road.
Therefore, a timing plan can be developed which will maximize westbound
progression and ensure that the Blackhawk Plaza signal does not create a nega-
tive impact on Diffley Road traffic.
COST OF THE PROPOSED SIGNAL
The cost of the proposed signal could vary depending on design decisions
relating to the signal and its coordination with adjacent signals. Based on the
information available, BRW's estimate of the construction cost is $50,000 to
$70,000. The lower end of this range would apply if time -based coordination
could be utilized. The upper end of the range assumes that a hard -wire inter-
connect would be needed and that the cost of the interconnect system would be
included in the cost of the Blackhawk Plaza signal. These cost estimates do not
include ttie cost of roadway improvements needed to add a left -turn lane in the
median of Diffley Road. It is our understanding that both the roadway improve-
ments and the traffic signal improvements would be financed by Blackhawk Plaza.
ER/jkf
cc: Luther Stalland
Steve Ramsey
DAVID K. PARKHILL
Real Estate Broker
9501 Russell Avenue South
Bloomington, MN 55431
July 21, 1988
Mr. Luther M. Stalland
Attorney at Law
5200 West 73rd Street
Minneapolis, MN 55435
Re: Median Cut, Co. Rd. 30
at Blackhawk Plaza
Dear Luther:
This letter is to update you on our progress, or lack
thereof, in attempting to market the outlots at Blackhawk
Plaza that border on Diffley Road (Co. Rd. 30).
These lots are excellent retail sites except for one
glaring deficiency; namely, the lack of a median cut on
Diffley Road at the shopping center entrance. I have shown
the lots to seven interested, qualified buyers, including four
service station companies. All have turned down the location
principally because of the lack of a median cut. Some, who
have not found alternate sites, are still interested if this
can be remedied.
Please contact me when and if the situation changes.
Yours truly,
DKP/vl
cc: Mr. Steve Ramsey
•
David K. Parkhill
11-j 11 -11;11ZIAT
A Il.._
BENNETT. RINOROSE, WOLSrELD, JARVIS, OARDNER. INC. • THRESHER SQUARE 700 THIRD STREET
May 17, 1988
Mr. Luther Stalland
Norse Development Company
One Corporate Center Financial Plaza
7261 Ohms Lane
Minneapolis, MN 55435
RE: Potential Blackhawk Plaza Access Slgnalization
PLANNING
T RANSPOR IAT ION
EN(3INEEnING
ARCM ECTURE
SOUTH MINNEAPOLIS, MN S5415 • PHONE 012/370-0700
Dear Mr. Stalland:
The City of Eagan requested the consulting firm of Short Elliot
Hendrickson to review the proposal to provide a median break on CSAII
30 to allow eastbound traffic to enter Blackhawk Plaza. We understand
that SEII approves of the concept, but has the following questions
regarding a potential signal at that location:
o Could this signal be coordinated with the adjacent traffic signals?
o What 1s the estimated construction cost of this signal?
The potential signal would stop westbound traffic on CSAII 30 to allow
a protected left turn into Blackhawk Plaza. Left turns would be
prohibited at all other times. The eastbound through movement would
not be stopped. This limited control by the signal would allow the
signal to be added and coordinated with other signals without
significantly deteriorating progression on CSAR 30.
The estimated construction cost of the traffic signal is $60,000.
This assumes that the adjacent signals have controllers which are
capable of time -based coordination. If they do not have this
capability, an additional $1,000 to $10,000 would be required.
The above information is general in nature. Additional study
would be necessary to determine signal timing and cost.
Sincerely,
BENNETT-RINGROSE-WULSFELD-JARVIS-GARDNER, Inc.
tud
Richard P. Wolsfeld, PE
DAVID .1 RENNF7, DONAI1)W RINOnCSF RICTIARDPW(71STTID PETERE JARVIS tAWRENCFJ OARDNER 71IDMAsrCARROLL CRAIDA AMIUNJDSEN
DONALD E. HUNT
MARK 0 SWENSON JOHN B McNAMARA RICHARD 0 PILGRIM DALE N BECKMANN
MINNEAPOLIS DENVER
DENNIS J SUTLIFF
PHOENIX
PLANNING
TRANSPORTATION
ENGINEERING
ARCHITECTURE
BENNETT, RINGROSE, WOLSFELD. JARVIS. GARDNER. INC. THRESHER SOU4RE 700 T14IR0 STREET SOUTH MINNEAPOLIS. MN 55415 • PHONE 612/370-0700
April 20, 1988
Mr. Luther Stalland
Norse Development Company
One Corporate Center Financial Plaza
,7261 Ohms Lane
Minneapolis, MN 55435
Dear Mr. Stalland:
As you requested, BRW, Inc. has reviewed the analysis completed for the Traffic
Access Study for Blackhawk Plaza prepared in May of 1985 and updated in August
1986. Traffic forecasts prepared for these studies were based on the Regional
forecasts prepared by the Minnesota Department of Transportation and Metropolitan
Council for the year 2000.
We first checked the forecast of volumes on CSAR 30 made for the 1985 study
against the regional forecast for the year 2010. The fact that the 2010 regional
forecast shows only a ten percent increase over the 2000 BRW forecast indicates
that the BRW forecast was probably conservative; this was also noted in the 1985
study.
Conversations with the Dakota County Traffic Engineer and the City of Eagan have
indicated that no significant developments or streei system changes have occurred
which would require a revision of the traffic forecasts and analysis. A joint
study is currently being conducted by the City and the County which will update
traffic forecasts in the area. It is not known at this time whether the results
of this study will indicate a need to update the Blackhawk Plaza analysis.
Sincerely,
BENNETT-RINGROSE-WOLSFELD-JARVIS-GARDNER, INC.
Richard P. Wolsfeld, PE
DAVID J RENNETT DONALD W RINGROSE RICHARDP WOl SEELD PETER E JARVIS LAWRENCE J GARDNER THOMAS F CARROLL CRAIG A AMUNDSEN
DONALD E. HUNT MARK SWENSON JOHNS McNAMARA RICHARD D PILGRIM DALE N BECKMANN DENNISJ SUTLIFF
MINNEAPOLIS DENVER
PHOENIX
Y ✓ '
Don L. Clark
District Manager
April 5, 1988
Haven Enterprises
1442 Excelsior Boulevard
Minnetonka, Minnesota 55435
Attention: Steve Ramsey
Re:
Blackhawk Plaza
Diffley Road & I -35E
Eagan, Minnesota
Dear Mr. Ramsey:
Amoco 011 Company
Twin Cities District
Southgate Office Plaza, Suite 890
5001 West ROth Street
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55437
612-831-3464
Lot 5 of the above project has been presented to Amoco by two
commercial realtors; Century 21 Lang Agency, Inc. (Myles
Borstad) and Dave Parkhill.
Amoco would be interested in your site if there was a break in
the median on Diffley Road, allowing full traffic movement in
and out of the site.
Please advise if a median break can be obtained.
C. L. Kristuf
Business Devel
nt Representative
r
cc: Myles Borstad - Century 21 Lang Agency
Dave Parkhill
CLK/cmb
23S
January 13, 1988
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN. RECEIPT REQUESTED
Re: Ramsey 2
Blackhawk Plaza
Haven Enterprises, Inc.
1 Attn: Steve B. Ramsey
14442 Excelsior Blvd.
Minnetonka, MN 55345
Dear Mr. Ramsey:
Phillips has elected not to pursue the purchase of your property described
as Lot 5, Block 1, Blackhawk Plaza pursuant to the Option to Purchase Real
Estate dated September 11, 1987.
GCJ:sm
cc: R. W. Parkinson
G. S. Page.
John Carpenter
t
23()
Very truly yours,
Gary C. Johnson
PHILLIPS 66 COMPANY
4182 REINDEER LANE 612-454-5931
EAGAN, MINNESOTA 55123
MARKETING DIVISION
Mr. Dave Parkhill
Leasing Agent
Blackhawk Plaza
9501 Russell Ave. S.
Bloomington, MN 55431
Dear Dave:
April 15, 1988
Phillip's letter of January 13, 1988, to Steve B. Ramsey,
Haven Enterprises, Inc. stated that Phillips 66 Company
elected not to pursue the purchase of Lot 5, Block 1,
Blackhawk Plaza, pursuant to the Option to Purchase Real
Estate, dated September 11, 1987.
The lack of a curb cut in the median on Diffley Road (County
Road 30), was the primary reason Management elected not
to purchase the property. Without this curb cut, access to
the station site was greatly restricted.
Eastbound traffic on Diffley Road could not directly enter,
the Plaza at Lot 5. Westbound traffic entering the site
would not be able to exit directly back onto Diffley Road
heading east. In both cases, customers would have to use
the entrance on Blackhawk Road, at the west end of the Plaza.
In order for our new station to be successful, we must have
better accessibility from the primary street. Should this
curb cut be obtained, we will then present this proposal
to Management for reconsideration.
Sincerely,
cy'hn Carpenter
etail Representative
z��
/ Council Minutes 1
.ne 4, 1985
9. Rooftop mechanical equipment shall be concealed by a parapet wall 4r
suitable screening.
10. A storm water detention pond shall be constructed on Lot 7 with>a
capacity of 1.4 acre feet.
11. A permit shall be obtained from MnDOT to perform grading within MnDOT
subdivision.
12. The watermain shall be looped from Blackhawk Road to the Hillandale 2 •,.
subdivision.
13. The private road shall be 36 feet wide from Blackhawk Road to the
hotel.
14. This development shall be responsible for upgrading the east side of
Blackhawk Road from Diffley Road to its north property line.
15. A ponding easement shall be required over Lot 7 to accomodate 1.4
acre feet of storage.
16. This development shall be responsible for any unlevied trunk area
related assessments or any upgrading of trunk area related assessments as
necessary.
Blackhawk Road upgrading from the end of this development to Deerwood
Drive shall be approved prior to final plat approval.
18. The applicant shall work with Dakota County to insure that the
primary access to the development is from County Road #30 in view of the
residential nature of Blackhawk Road.
All members voted yes.
Egan moved, Wachter seconded the motion to approve the following
conditional use permits: driveup bank and service station, under the
following conditions:
1. The applicant shall provide a proof of parking plan for the service
station showing how parking could be expanded, if needed.
2. The bank shall provide stacking space for 20 vehicles.
3. All City ordinances and requirements shall be adhered to.
All members voted Affirmatively.
1
2 g
BLACKHAWK ROAD
"P
(.1)
1))
'C) 0 '13
7c"
0
-6 So
-c)
1-
-a SO
9.)
I -35E WEST RAMP
-n
t
.40
4,4
,isok
;90
BLACKHAWK /30,40
03
0
kr)
7;
AuL
•e°
1.4
\ 1-35E WEST RAMP
1 0..+ --70-O a m <oor7 c o 00 0>
d a cn A cn • 0
.; 500c
• • • • • uvs roiSm o +v`°i
0 c 0 -+d —3 --f^-+-+ -v _ vm c $
4. 3 c 3 1 A ods --3 - -, A cp --- — �°� z
�1 01 Co --1. •++ 7" -< d ••- 0. O.
d 0. o 0 0 i j. c 0 l -+ �' 7 �<
7 : N N _• to c0
a a) -f u) in 0 0. n co c -1 01 -
C al 0 N o<— 4--u -+ CD•• Alot d
Iv -+ o n vd i -+ of Or of _
+ ro 0131
0
A 0 a7.O On A
4.
a o-+ 0f gO
3 3dovtl Cd7 ; d
4 no -+— t9 nN -
0
0
S -+
-4.
-Pt
COV
-+ d AN — D 0 'A ? -+ V+ 4 0
ft 5 S�0 --4 O 0-13-1 a. In -+"
+�s n C v;lA 3. 0o < 3 -4- a -- -. 0 01 0ca
-
0(_m d0. 0 —fi0 •
-I o7C-4..
d i. < m -,.< < 7
5 0 < 0- 0--« i; C A A S a
v 0 � til
0 0 << Q - M0.0 \ 'd
cm CO 3 <—n---1121 11
3. '- -* = O 0 01 C R d A -}
O 7 O N 1
d -' '1 5 N O ro ? A 10 <
3 0 0 • -- -+0 0 o m
a., in 0
IT
c n _� N 0
S "1' VAf d d -+ 0 0 -+ 7 -} 5
Q 0 i 1:f1 0 A
p •-+ O, C_ 7 , mo�.10
f
Q
3.
s 7 03 C3 01
x o�
1dg 8X�-g: a
0 -+ 1
04
O d d? d 7
.. n
-f c0 *n S 0 N
f
-d+ -d+ 0 7 0 Ov
0 • < 0 —•c o 0
0 —0-•d<
a.
q W O 0< A
v -- 1n `t -• o
178 A O�
d
OF
a Ex 0 O a_
g n < = = -. - 0
0. ro -F n d 7
C7 0 A a -F 0.
O
3--+Ct10On A
-+• in M0 s="`4
-4 • o 0
V
C)
ENGINEERS ■ ARCHITECTS 1 PLANNERS
July 25, 1988
222 EAST LITTLE CANADA ROAD, ST PAUL, MINNESOTA 55117 612 484-0272
Mr. Dale Runkle, City Planner
City of Eagan
3830 Pilot Knob Road
Eagan, MN 55122
Dear Mr. Runkle:
RE: EAGAN, MINNNESOTA
DIFFLEY ROAD
BLACKHAWK PLAZA ACCESS
SEH FILE NO: 88077
The City, some time ago, verbally asked our reaction to opening
the median on Diffley Road between Blackhawk Drive and Interstate
35E. The median opening would provide full access to Blackhawk
Plaza. Our initial reaction was that it would be better off to
remain closed. If opened, it would have to be signalized and the
signal coordinated in a Diffly Road system. We indicated that
the signal installation and coordination would be determined by
Dakota County.
Since that time, some misunderstanding apparently has developed.
The developer apparently believes that we have approved of the
concept, subject to questions of signal coordination. There have
also been discussions relative to whether the median opening
would permit all left turns or only into the site from eastbound
Diffley Road.
To clerify the situation, we reviewed the traffic volumes
foreeasted as part of our Dakota County Study. Volumes on
Diffley Road are relatively high especially in the p.m. peak
hour. We estimate that there will be approximately 1,600
vehicles per hour westbound and 1,400 vehicles per hour eastbound
past the median opening. In addition, the westbound volumes
would be almost equally distributed coming from the southbound I -
35E off ramp and westbound Diffley Road on the bridge over I -35E.
Thus it appears the potential for coordination for any traffic
signal is remote. Our study of the Cliff Lake Centre also
indicated a significant potential for weaving on Diffley Road
between Interstate 35E and Blackhawk Drive. This weave would be
A considerably complicated by installation of a traffic signal
halfway between two intersections.
SHORT ELLIOTT MI PNES
MINNESOTA?
HENDRICKSON INC.
CHIPPEWA FALLS,
WISCONSIN
Mr. Dale Runkle
July 25, 1988
Page 2
For these reasons, we do not feel that there is justification for
seeking a median opening on Diffley Road.
Dakota County has control over access along Diffley Road. They
have also reviewed the situation and do not feel a median opening
is justified. We therefore recommend that the City drop any
further consideration of a median opening on Diffley Road between
Interstate 35E and Blackhawk drive.
If you have any questions or need any additional information,
please feel free to contact our office.
Sincerely,
4vg,0,772,t)
Glen Van Wormer
GVW/cjc
cc: Pete Sorenson, Dakota County
Tom Colbert, City of Eagan