Loading...
09/19/1988 - City Council RegularAGENDA REGULAR MEETING MONDAY, SEPTEMBER 19, 191813 6:30 P.M. MUNICIPAL CENTER BUILDING EAGAN CITY COUNCIL EAGAN, MINNESOTA I. 6:30 - ROLL CALL & PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE (BLUE) II. 6:35 - ADOPT AGENDA & APPROVAL OF MINUTES (BLUE) III. 6:40 - BOND SALE FOR $13,400,000 G.O. & $1,850,000 FIRE FACILITIES BONDS IV. A F.31. B. r• sl. CI 2. P .133. P 6:45 - DEPARTMENT HEAD BUSINESS (BLUE) POLICE DEPARTMENT Retirement Notice - Chief of Police Jay Berthe PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Consider Petition for Stop Sign - Beaver Dam Rd at Bear Path Trail Consider Membership, Water Quality Management Committee Designation of Reduced School Zone Speed limit -Wescott Road at Woodlands Elementary V. 6:55 - CONSENT AGENDA (PINK) JZ A. PERSONNEL Items .0;\ B. LICENSES, Plumbers .ici C. LICENSE, Liquor, New Manager/LaFonda De Acebo Restaurant ..2,OD. VACATE Sanitary Sewer Easement, Receive Petition/Order Public Hearing (Stoney Point) 1.4 E. CONTRACT 88-31, Receive Bids/Award Contract (Well #12) 111° . ZF. CONTRACT 88-30, Receive Bids/Award Contract (South Oaks - Streets & Utilities) CONTRACT 88-34, Approve Plans/Authorize Advertisement for Bids (Alden Pond, Fox Ridge - Streets & Utilities) FINAL ACCEPTANCE, Miscellaneous Projects CONTRACT 88-37, Approve Plans/Authorize Advertisement for Bids (Cutters Ridge & General Electric - Utilities) FINAL PLAT, Stratford Oaks Addition FINAL PLAT, Berry Ridge Addition VACATION, Drainage/Utility Easement -Lot 8, Hilltop of Eagan CONTRACT 87-40, Final Payment/Acceptance (Gopher Eagan Industrial Park 2nd Addition - Street & Utilites) CONTRACT 87-19, Final Payment/Acceptance (Windtree 8th Addition - Streets & Utilities) CONTRACT 85-18, Approve Change Order #1 (UPS - Streets & Utilities) PROJECT 513, Cancel Project/Pending Assessments (Brittany 10th - Trunk Watermain) PROJECT 449, Cancel Project/Pending Assessments (Country Club Market - Driveway Extension) SH. J P' .a.9 K. f. --3t L. . 33M. e.33N. 330. �,34P. VI. 7:00 - PUBLIC HEARINGS (SALMON) 17.5,-Z92. p.oc. L1#D. ' �3E. P,4a F. r.�,SG. VACATION, Partial Right -of -Way (Mendota VACATION, Partial Right -of -Way (Part of PROJECT 543, Public Hearing (Prettyman 6, 1988, City Council Meeting Project 496, Final Assessment Hearing (Brittany 10th - Trunk Storm Project 517, Final Assessment Hearing (St. Francis Woods 6th Streets & Utilities) Project 500, Final Assessment Hearing (Eagan Royale/Briar Oaks Utilities) PROJECT 461, Final Assessment Hearing (Yankee Doodle Road - Lexington Avenue - Streets) Continued Wagon Road) Cedarvale Drive) Project Withdrawn Heights - Streets) Continued to Oct Sewer) Addition - Trunk I -35E to VIII. t3s B. C. LUD• L tSE Project 516, Utilities) Project 485, Utilities) Project 494, Utilities) Project 491, Project 498 Utilities) PROJECT 499 Final Assessment Hearing (Gopher Eagan 2nd Addition - Streets Final Assessment Hearing (Northview Park Road - Streets & Final Assessment Hearing (East Wescott Road - Streets & Final Assessment Hearing (Eagan Hills Farms - Streets & Util) , Final Assessment Hearing (Stafford Place - Streets & , Final Assessment Hearing (Chapel Hill Baptist Church- Streets) Continued Project 473, Final Assessment Hearing (Pilot Knob Road - Trunk Storm Sewer) Project 506, Final Assessment Hearing (Parkcliff 2nd Addition - Storm Sewer) DELINQUENT Weed Cutting Bills DELINQUENT Utility Bills CONSIDER Proposed 1989 General Fund Budget OLD BUSINESS (ORCHID) COMPREHENSIVE GUIDE PLAN AMENDMENT, Solderholm Addition /Eagle Enterprises, PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AMENDMENT (REZONING) of 4.52 R -4 (Multiple) Acres Within the Lexington South Planned Development to a LB (Limited Business) District and a PRELIMINARY PLAT Containing Three Lots Located at the NW Intersection of Lexington Avenue and Diffley Road in SW1 of Sec 23 REZONING, Suncrest Addition /William Huttner, of 10.53 A (Agricultural) Acres to an R -1 (Single Family) District and a PRELIMINARY PLAT Consisting of 16 Lots Located North of Sunwood Trail and South of Birch Street in SE 1/4 of Sec 14 NEW BUSINESS (TAN) APPOINTMENTS, Economic Development Commission Recreation Commission VARIANCE, Brutger Companies, 5' Variance to Rear Yard Setback on Lots 1 -6, Block 3, Oak Cliff Pond Addition WAIVER OF PLAT, Mark Calvin, Duplex Lot Split to Allow Individual Ownership on Lot 7, Block 1, Oakwood Heights 2nd Addition WAIVER OF PLAT, Zachman Brother Construction Co, Inc, Duplex Lot Split to Allow Individual Ownership on Lot 1, Block 1, Cinnamon Ridge 6th Addition CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT, Mark M. Weiderhaft, to Allow a Beauty Parlor in an R -1 (Single Family) District Located at 4345 Rahn Road in NE1 of Sec 30 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT, T.F.James Co.,to Allow an Automotive Service Station With a Car Wash and a VARIANCE for a Canopy Setback Located on Lot 3, Block 1, Hilltop Plaza Addition at NE Intersection of Pilot Knob Road and Diffley Road in SEA of Sec 22 WAIVER OF PLAT, National Minerals Corporation, in Order to Split Lot 10, Eagandale Center Industrial Park 3rd Addition, Located Along the South Side of Lone Oak Road East of Lunar Lane in the NE1 of Sec 11 PRELIMINARY PLAT, Ridge Haven Addition /Haven Enterprises, for 5.2 R -1 (Single- Family) Acres Consisting of 14 Lots Located East of Highway 13 and South of Sibley Hills Drive in SW1 of Sec 4 ORDINANCE AMENDMENT, City of Eagan, To Amend Chapter 13 of the Eagan City Code By Amending the Development Standards and Submission Requirements UPDATE, Comprehensive Guide Plan, City of Eagan ADDITIONAL ITEMS (GOLD) ADMINISTRATIVE AGENDA (GREEN) _VISITORS TO BE HEARD (for those persons not on agenda) ADJOURNMENT and Advisory Parks & MEMO TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIIMEMBERS FROM: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES DATE: SEPTEMBER 14, 1988 SUBJECT: AGENDA INFORMATION FOR SEPTEMBER 19, 1988 CITY COUNCIL MEETING ADOPT AGENDA APPROVE MINUTES After approval is given to the September 19, 1988 agenda and regular City Council meeting minutes for the September 6, 1988, the following items are in order for consideration: BOND SALE FOR 13 400 000 G.O. & $1 850 000 FIRE FACILITIES BONDS At the August 16, 1988 City Council meeting, authorization was given to set a bond sale for G.O. public improvements and for Fire Stations 4 and 5 on September 19. As a part of that action, a bond credit rating was authorized from Standard and Poor's and Moody's. City Councilmember Egan, City Administrator Hedges and Director of Finance VanOverbeke appeared before Standard and Poor's and Moody's and have been notified that the A+ rating of Standard and Poor's will continue and the previous A rating of Moody's has been upgraded to an Al status. Both rating agencies were highly complementary of the City of Eagan and it appears that when the amount of outstanding debt of the public improvement /special assessment projects is reduced, proportionate to assessed valuation, the credit rating will more than lik ly be increased from its present status. Enclosed as page is a letter from Robert Pulscher of Springsted summarizing the Moody's upgrading. Since the bond sale is scheduled for noon on Monday the 19th, it will not be possible to share any results of that sale until the meeting. Enclosed and referenced in the informative memo is a copy of the official statement for this bond sale. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To consider and approve necessary resolutions for accepting the lowest bid for the sale of $13,400,00 General Obligation and Public Improvement Bonds and $1,850,000 General Obligation Fire Facilities Bonds. prA SPRINGSTED DUBLIC FINANCE ADVISORS !35 East Seventh Place, Suite 100 Sant Paul, Minnesota 55101-2143 612223.3000 Fax: 612.223.3002 September 14, 1988 Mr. Thomas Hedges, City Administrator City of Eagan City Hall 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55122 Dear Mr. Hedges: As we discussed yesterday, the City of Eagan has received an upgrading of its bond rating from "A" to "A 1" from Moody's Investors Service. You are to be congratulated on this upgrading, particularly in view of the significant future financing that still faces the City. The rating agencies indicated they were impressed with three areas in particular. They are the long tenure of the existing staff which is somewhat unusual in a community that has grown as rapidly as has Eagan; the above average income levels of Eagan residents; and the amount and quality of growth taking place in the community during the past several years. The rating agency did express concern about the significant future financing which the City will have to incur, and the lack of a long -term capital improvement program, which they view as essential to proper planning by the City. We are pleased to have been a small part of this rating upgrading. It is our experience that you have reached an "A 1" rating somewhat sooner than most other communities which have undergone significant growth in recent years. If you have any questions about this matter, we will be happy to try and answer them. We look forward to a successful sale on September 19th. Robert D. Pulscher Chief Executive Officer bb cc: ncerely yours, Mr. Eugene VanOverbeke, Financial Director Indiana Office. 251 North Illinois Street, Suite 1510 Indianapolis, Indiana 46204.1942 317.2373636 Fax: 317.237.3639 Wisconsin Office 500 Elm Grove Road, Suite 101 Elm Grove, Wisconsin 53122.0037 414782.8222 Fax: 414.782.2904 Agenda Information Memo September 19, 1988, City Council Meeting A. POLICE DEPARTMENT: DEPARTMENT HEAD BUSINESS Item 1. etirement Notice of Jay Berthe -- Enclosed and referenced as page is a memo from Chief of Police Berthe announcing his plans to etire, effective January 20, 1989, from the City of Eagan. For all practical purposes, Chief Berthe is a charter member of our first Police Department during his tenure as an officer, sergeant, assistant chief and most recently our Chief of Police. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To accept the retirement notification of Jay Berthe as an employee of the City of Eagan to be effective January 20, 1989, and authorize the City Administrator to begin the selection process for a Chief of Police. 3 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, Minnesota 55122 Phone: (612) 454 -3900 city of Cagan August 31, 1988 TO: TOM HEDGES, CITY ADMINISTRATOR FROM: JAY BERTHE, CHIEF OF POLICE SUBJECT: RETIREMENT JMB /lb Berthe Chief THE LONE OAK TREE THE SYMBOL OF STRENGTH AND GROWTH IN OUR COMMUNITY police department JAY M. BERTHE Chief of Police PATRICK J. GEAGAN Administrative Captain KENNETH D. ASZMANN Operations Captain As you are aware, I plan to retire in early 1989. The established date of my retirement is January 20th, 1989. My plans, at present, are to take approximately six weeks vacation from November 28, 1988 through January 6, 1989. Hopefully, in the time prior to January 20th, 1989, you can accomplish much of the task of finding my replacement. In my 23 years as a Law Enforcement Officer for the City of Eagan, I have enjoyed working with you and many elected officials. I will miss the management team, as well as the other city employees. Also, of honorable mention, is the Fire Department, for which I have utmost respect. I have seen the Police Department grow from a handful of employees to more than 60 employees. I have many good, as well as bad memories, but certainly the majority are of a good nature. It has been an honor to serve the City of Eagan in my many and varied job capacities. VIC ELLISON Mayor THOMAS EGAN DAVID K GUSTAFSON PAMELA McCREA THEODORE WACHTER Council Members THOMAS HEDGES City Administrator EUGENE VAN OVERBEKE City Clerk Agenda Information Memo September 19, 1988, City Council Meeting B. PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Item 1. Petition For Stop Sign - Beaver am Road at Bear Path Trail -- Enclosed on pages (Q through is a cover letter accompanying a petition and location map requesting the installation of stop signs on Beaver Dam Road at its intersection with Bear Path Trail. Because the installation of stop signs at this intersection as petitioned does not meet the warrants in accordance with the Manual On Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD), the City Engineer is forwarding this request directly to the City Council for review and action. The following is a list of reasons why the City Engineer cannot recommend approval of this petition request: * There is insufficient cross traffic to warrant the stopping of Beaver Dam Road. * There presently exists a 5' concrete sidewalk along the west side of Beaver Dam Road for pedestrian movement. * The entrance to the park property is located opposite Shale Lane on Beaver Dam Road and SunCliff Road on Bear Path Trail approximately 2 blocks east of the intersection in question. * The installation of "Slow Children At Play" signs has been reserved for locations adjacent to specific areas where congregations of children are anticipated (playgrounds, schools, etc.) * With the existance of crossing guards and portable stop signs on school buses, it is not appropriate to install stop signs at every school bus stop. * A frequently used pedestrian crosswalk, appropriate crosswalk striping and advanced signings could be installed. A representative of the petitioners has been informed that this item will be considered by the Council on September 19. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve /deny the installation of stop signs on Beaver Dam Road at Bear Path Trail. 4325 Bear Path Trail ragan, IYIirnesota 55122 Tom Colbert Director of City Works 3830 Pilot Knob Road Ragan, Minnesota 55122 Dear flr. Colbert, Enclosed is a neighborhood petition for a stop sign on Beaver Dam Road at Bear Path Trail. Along with these stop signs we,(the residents) would like to request your consideration for signs at each entrance to Bear Path Trail, in the I4edowland addition, which would state, "Slow, Children at Play." There are a number of small children in this neighborhood and we are continuing to see increased traffic flow through Bear Path Trail. This traffic flow can only be expected to continue to increase with the increased development in the area. We, the residents of Bear Path Trail, feel this reason,.as.well as the other reasons stated on the petition are enough for these two type of signs to be considered by the city of Eagan. Thank you for your consideration on this issue. If you have any questions please call me at 452 -53 Sincerely, Cynthia A. Davis Enclosure J c . A . �,? September 1, 1988 PETITION STOP SIGN I /We, the undersigned hereby petition the City Council of the City of Eagan to install stop signs on � - - bCI . Y L at the intersection with I /We, request this installation for the following reasons: 3. 4. 3 Col 2. t1r1a1A--q Ciu re.,t) Cvoss SD -}.° w.e 8-0 1 yid P a v k reased l n c v--c I S Gk, l3-US S /c;p d ` rnc ( mot l '- `I- VA- CL_ C� v i 5 t ree. o C)L,ur c td. rev - ea c_Li cut fv, o } o_> re0.s• ova 4 SAO s-i ��1} I /We request that the City Council take this petition request under consideration at its earliest opportunity and that we be informed as to when it is scheduled so that we may appear in person if we so choose. 1. 9. NAME (Please print and initial) 0A+1+1.kia A. bakiLs 1 a 4 2. e 96 5 ) T-1'- FOR CITY USE ONLY Date Received Approved To Council Co ✓ tilt" v ADDRESS q3; 5 R., n r Pr ci--� pc LoT 1* et.. L/33 O 7,ea _ & ubr s-4 eL.3 au / *} 1� c 4/3 7i 33 Li i(L P T \ea{ Pc:5. /3 a , LJ k J L /c//27/etA(t . .t/ c/R_) .� , ,� P it. 14 365 Seaver Do+i (� d• /5 et, ! cI.-e ). d c� ( +0 0 C 0-Lt. (-or 11. E(.. 3 L. r Get S31... OM 20 3 ♦ . Agenda Information Memo September 19, 1988, City Council Meeting Item 2. Consider Membership, Water Quality Management Committee - -On September 6, the City Council accepted the resignation of Doug Wilcox as a Committee member representative to the Water Quality Management Committee and appointed a designated alternate, Richard Starr, to replace Mr. Wilcox as the full Committee member citizen representative. The Council then appointed Mr. Karl Heine as the alternate citizen representative to this Committee. Recently, Mr. Starr has informed City staff that he will be unable to attend future Committee meetings due to a time conflict. In reviewing the situation with the Committee, it was determined that there are no other times better suited for the majority of the members. Therefore, due to Mr. Starr's inability to attend future Committee meetings, it is the Public Works Director's recommendation that his position as full citizen representative be replaced by a new member. This could either be through an elevation of Mr. Heine, who was recently appointed as the alternate, and then filling his position with one of the two remaining applicants whose information is enclosed on pages 0 through . ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To designate a replacement citizen member to the Water Quality Management Committee. Name Address Telephone f N � —Y.w• a ice..... .. Relevant experience or education: l 0 Citizens Committee Application -Water Quality Plan U\ 1; L . fl.re)77 J 3SO C t/ 9 % 1 n Your specific interest in serving on this committee: Z-& k' wh<<% 15 k1 7/C .1 h << v c /1,-1 A Tt L-oi1 A I r, rc're"..r 1/7 _5S , (✓ once cr - Co r 6060- t: t 1 e o C/ t s tt a'n Fck t{i -car Mcf, , f-3 A_ Fin Sr Cl ccf Cc /1e9e- Metje h iC'Wee) � - TWO (Amin to VVOr for ONR cs hit; /o5 sr aide 3830 PILOT KNOB ROAD, P.O. BOX 21199 EAGAN, MINNESOTA 55121 PHONE: (612) 454 -8100 June 19, 1987 DICK OUREN 1350 CRESTRIDGE LN EAGAN MN 55123 Re: Application for Water Ouality Management Committee Dear Mr. Ouren: The City is currently involved in preparing a Comprehensive Water Quality Management Plan for our community. As a part of this plan's preparation, we will be creating a citizen's committee to help establish the standards and criteria for various classifica- tion of approximately 340 wetlands /lakes within our community. We have received information that you have expressed a desire to serve on this committee. We are enthused by the response that we have received from the community regarding this voluntary service. Therefore, I would like to request you complete the enclosed, short application form and return it to my attention by June 29 so that we can further evaluate all applications on an equal basis and make a final determination of individuals to sit on this committee. Your continued interest is greatly appreciated and I look forward to receiving your application in the near future. Sincerely, ,/ homas A. Colbert, P.E. Director of Public Works Enclosure TAC /kf city OF ecigan THE LONE OAK TREE ..THE SYMBOL OF STRENGTH AND GROWTH IN OUR COMMUNITY BEA BLOMQUIST Mayor THOMAS EGAN JAMES A. SMITH VIC ELLISON THEODORE WACHTER Council Members THOMAS HEDGES City Administrator EUGENE VAN OVERBEKE City Clerk September 1, 1988 Mr. Thomas Colvert Director of Public Works City of Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55122 Dear Mr. Colvert: Thanks for making me aware of the opportunity for becoming a committee member for the Eagan Water Quality Management Program. Although I have only been an Eagan property owner for a short while, I have spent a good deal of time investigating the possibility of obtaining federal and/or state funding for the cleaning the lakes of Eagan. I would be delighted to discuss some of the information I have relating to the available federal and state programs we might qualify for. I look forward to helping in any way possible to acquire some of the funding and also to working with other members of our community in meeting our goals for protecting, maintaining and improving Eagan's very valuable water resources. I'll be looking forward to hearing about the committee's decision as to approval of my membership. Please call me at 853 -7820 at your earliest convenience. Thanks again. I appreciate your consideration of my application. Sincerely, Barb Agne Agenda Information Memo September 19, 1988, City Council Meeting Item 3. School Zone Speed Limit Designate n - Wescott Road at Woodland Elementary -- Enclosed on pages I through ) (O are letters the Public Works Director has eceived r questing consideration of reducing the speed limit on Wescott Road in front of the Woodlands Elementary School. Current State Statute provides the authority to the local jurisdiction to reduce speed limits on roadways directly adjacent to school roperty "when children are present ". Enclosed on page � is a map referencing the existing and proposed speed limit signs that would be installed if approved by Council action. The Public Works and Parks Departments are jointly performing a study pertaining to the winter maintenance of sidewalks and trailways adjacent to schools as well as the entire community and . will be presenting a report for consideration in the near future. It is recommended that only the reduced school zone speed limit issue be addressed at this time with additional sidewalk /trailway construction and /or maintenance policies be addressed subject to completion of staff's report. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve /deny a reduced school zone speed limit on Wescott Road adjacent to Woodlands Elementary. �3 INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT 196 14445 DIAMOND PATH ROSEMOUNT, MINNESOTA 55068 -4199 612- 454 -0504 Mr. Tom Colbert Director of Public Works City of Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Road, P.O. Box 21199 Eagan, Minnesota 55121 Dear Tom, •WOODLAND ELEMENTARY TERRY LANGAGER. PRINCIPAL September 13, 1988 I am writing this letter to ask your assistance in a situation here at Woodland that relates directly to the City of Eagan. The issue deals with the speed limit on Wescott Road. With many of our students walking to school along Wescott and with the high concentration of construction traffic, the present speed limit of 45 miles per hour creates a potentially dangerous situation. I feel a speed limit of 30 miles per hour while school is in session would be a more desirable limit. Any assistance that you can give us with this problem would be greatly appreciated. Mr. Thomas Colbert Director of Public Works City of Eagan, Minnesota Mr. Colbert, September 9, 1988 We are residents of the Lexington Square Addition and parents of students at Woodland Elementary School. We are concerned for the safety of the (approximately 100 ?) children of Lexington Square walking to school. Our concerns relate to the traffic on Wescott Ave. between Danbury Trail and the west driveway to Woodland Elementary. First, we are concerned that the speed on Wescott is not reduced in the school area_ The school is not visible from Wescott, there are no signs indicating a school is in the area, hills limit visibility from both the east and west, and the speed limit on the four lane road is 45 mph. There have been crosswalk signs erected on either side of the crossing to the school, but they are very close to the crosswalk itself and provide little warning space relative to the speed limit. They provide no indion of the swarms of biking and walking children present at certain times. We believe that a school speed zone should be established along this stretch of Wescott and flashing lights erected to warn of the presence of children during school hours. The Oakdale MNDOT Traffic Engineer's Office has stated that the City may establish school speed zones without a MNDOT speed survey. Second, we are concerned over the safety of children traveling on Danbury Trail to /from Lexington Square. There are no sidewalks or bikepaths along Danbury. Construction traffic has been routed along Danbury to avoid the more developed sections of the area. Again, there are no signs alerting drivers unfamiliar with the area that children may be present. We believe that signs and crosswalks should mark Danbury and the Danbury /Wescott intersection as an area for cautious driving. A sidewalk from Savannah to Wescott may be required for adequate safety. Third, we are concerned about how the bikepath /sidewalk along the south side of Wescott will be cleared of snow during the winter. Children cannot walk to school along Wescott if they must walk in the roadway. For the reasons cited in our first concern, it would be extremely dangerous for any child walking in the road from Danbury to Woodland School. Mr. Tom Nelson, District 196 Director of Support Services, indicates that discussions have been initiated with Mr. Hedges to see if Eagan will follow the practices of Burnsville, Lakeville, Apple Valley, and Rosemount and clear paths for school children. 1 Your staff have indicated the City is not prepared to do this. We believe the city should maintain the path along Wescott in a clear and safe manner during the school year. If the City will not perform this function, then it must notify District 196 and the parents of Lexington Square immediately so that actions to assure the childrens' safety may be initiated. We appreciate your attention to these concerns and believe that they soon can be resolved shortly through the efforts of the City and District 196. Sincerely, ft ysy ( POI W A94 234a. /Oil Er/ar reek e.P• to >o7 f' C-c ,d c _ ca: Tom Nelson, Director Support Services, Independent School District 196 Mr. Lanager, Principal, Woodland Elementary N WOODLAND TR. WESCOTT HILLS DR. 1 � � WOODLANDS SCHOOL E. GREENSBORO DR. 0 lr 1. Proposed 45 MPH speed limit sign 2. Existing school advance sign 3. Existing school crossing sign w /down arrow 4. Proposed reduced speed limit sign SPEED LIMIT 45 O O 0 1. Existing 45 MPH sign should be moved to end of reduced speed zone 2. Existing school advance sign should be located between 150' -700' of the school grounds or school crossing 3. School crossing sign is correctly located 4. Reduced speed limit sign should be located where a school speed zone begins, as established by law. RY TR. 'SCHOOL) SIGNS NOTES SCHOOL SPEED LIMIT 30 ,. W 1 YMI11 N1 Agenda Information Memo September 19, 1988, City Council Meeting A. PERSONNEL ITEMS: CONSENT AGENDA There areseventeen(17) items on the agenda referred to as consent items requiring one (1) motion by the City Council. If the City Council wishes to discuss any of the items in further detail, those items should be removed from the Consent Agenda and placed under Additional Items unless the discussion required is brief. PERSONNEL ITEMS Item 1. Seasonal Park Maintenance Worker -- For the Council's information, two of the five seasonal park maintenance workers who were approved for hire by the Council at the last City Council meeting notified the City that they had decided not to accept the City's offer of a seasonal maintenance position. The Superintendent of Parks needed another worker to begin before the September 19 Council meeting and had interviewed an acceptable candidate who was able to begin work immediately. Therefore, the City Administrator exercised the previous authorization given to him by the City Council wherein he could approve the hire of seasonal or temporary workers only in cases where the seasonal workers were needed to begin working before the next Council meeting. The person so approved as a seasonal park maintenance worker for the fall season is Jamie Noyes. This item is for the Council's information and no action is required. Agenda Information Memo September 19, 1988, City Council Meeting PLUMBERS LICENSES B. Plumbers Licenses - -There are four (4) plumbers licenses in order for consideration. They are as follows: 1. AAA -Ace Plumbing 2. Bowler Company 3. John Murdock and Son 4. Don Weld Plumbing All four (4) applications comply with City Code provisions regarding the licensing of plumbers. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve all four (4) plumbers licenses as presented. MANAGER LICENSE /LA FONDA DE ACEBO RESTAURANT C. License, Liquor, New Manager /LaFonda De Acebo Restaurant - -Mr. Joseph Harker has made application to be designated as manager of the liquor license at LaFonda De Acebo. An investigation was performed by the Police Department of Mr. Harker and according to Captain Geagan "as a result of contacts and an investigation, the department finds no information that would preclude Mr. Harker from holding a manager's liquor license at LaFonda's." Enclosed without page number is a copy of the Police memo and application regarding Mr. Harker's liquor license request. The memo from Sergeant Stevenson to Captain Geagan is confidential information. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve a liquor license application for a new manager at LaFonda De Acebo Restaurant in the name of Joseph Harker. Agenda Information Memo September 19, 1988, City Council Meeting VACATION /PUBLIC HEARING /STONEY POINTE D. Vacate Sanitary Sewer Easement, Receive Petition /Order Public Hearing (Stoney Pointe) - -The staff has received a request to vacate a portion of an existing sanitary sewer easement that trangresses the recently platted Stoney Pointe Addition north of Blackhawk Hills Road and west of I -35E. The affected existing sanitary sewer was reconstructed as a part of the utility installation within Stoney Pointe. It is appropriate to proceed with the formal public hearing schedule regarding this request. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To receive the petition to vacate a portion of an existing sanitary sewer easement within the Stoney Pointe Addition and schedule a formal public hearing to be held on October 18, 1988. RECEIVE BIDS /AWARD CONTRACT /WELL #12 E. Receive Bids, Award Contract (Well #12) - -At 10:30 a.m. on Wednesday, September 14, formal bids were received for the development of Well #12 to be located within Evergreen Park. Enclosed on page is a tabulation of the bids received with a comparison of th low bid to the engineer's estimate. As can be seen, very favorable bids were received on this project from a reputable contractor who has performed past similar work for the City. Therefore, it is recommended that the contract be awarded to the low bidder. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To receive the bid for Contract 88 -31 (Well #12), award the contract to Keys Well Drilling, Inc., in the amount of $121,425 and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute all related documents. CONTRACTOR TOTAL BASE BID 1. KEYS WELL DRILLING $121,425.00 2. LAYNE, MN. 131.485.00 3. E. H. RENNER 148,025.00 LOW BID ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE % Over ( +) Under ( -) E.E. DEEP WELL NO. 12 PROJECT 547A CONTRACT #88 -31 EAGAN, MN. 1988 BID TIME: 10:30 A.M. BID DATE: SEPTEMBER 14, 1988 $121,425.00 $145,000.00 - 16.3% Agenda Information Memo September 19, 1988, City Council Meeting RECEIVE BIDS /AWARD CONTRACT /SOUTH OAKS F. Contract 88 -30, Receive Bids /Awrd Contract (South Oaks - Streets & Utilities) - -At 10:30 a.m. on Friday, September 16, formal bids were received for the installation of streets and utilities within the South Oaks Addition. Enclosed on page ( ;)C5 is a tabulation of the bids received with a comparison of the low bid to the feasbility report estimates presented at the public hearing. All bids will be reviewed for accuracy with any problems or deviations being reported at the meeting on September 19. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To receive the bids for Contract 88 -30 (South Oaks - Streets & Utilities), award the contract to the lowest responsible bidder and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute all related documents. as SOUTH OAKS UTILITY & STREET IMPROVEMENTS CONTRACT NO. 88 -30 PROJECT NO. 536 EAGAN, MN. 1988 BID TIME: 11:30 A.M. BID DATE: THURS., SEPT. 15, 1988 CONTRACTORS ALTERNATE BID TOTAL BASE BID 1. Landwehr Heavy Moving $ +8,700.00 $ 463,954.00 2. Orfei Cont., Inc. +7,134.00 486,330.61 3. A. P. Keller Const. +4,350.00 499,148.50 4. L. A. Construction +7,308.00 499,882.60 5. S. M. Hentges & Sons +5,220.00 504,456.04 6. Northdale Const. 511,498.40 7. F. M. Frattalone +6,960.00 515,841.10 8. Progressive Cont. +4,350.00 528,957.10 9. Richard Knutson +1,305.00 572,558.68 10. S. J. Louis Const. +6,525.00 593,745.90 11. Ceca Utilities, Inc. +6,960.00 605,391.15 LOW BID FEASIBILITY REPORT ESTIMATE (F.R.) ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE (E.E.) % Over ( +) Under ( -) (F.R.) % Over ( +) Under ( -) (E.E.) a3 $ 463,954.00 $ 526,550.00 $ 545,000.00 - 11.9% - 14.9% Agenda Information Memo September 19, 1988, City Council Meeting APPROVE PLANS /ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS /ALDEN POND, FOX RIDGE G. Contract 88 -34, Approve Plans /Authorize Advertisement For Bids (Alden Pond, Fox Ridge - Streets & Utilities) -- Subsequent to the approval of the installation of streets and utilities for the Alden Pond Addition, detailed plans and specifications have been completed and are now being presented to the Council in consideration of authorizing a formal advertisement for competitive bid solicitations. Added to this contract are additional storm sewer improvements for the Fox Ridge Apartment complex adjacent to Coachman Road at Letendre Street in accordance with previous development obligations. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the plans for Contract 88 -34 (Alden Ponds, Fox Ridge - Streets & Utilities) and authorize the advertisement for a bid opening to be held at 10:30 a.m. on Friday, October 14, 1988. Agenda Information Memo September 19, 1988, City Council Meeting FINAL ACCEPTANCE /MISCELLANEOUS PROJECTS H. Final Acceptance, Miscellaneous Projects - -For the past five years, the City has allowed the design and construction of public infrastructure facilities to be installed either under a City Contract or privately by a developer to be turned over to the City for ultimate ownership and perpetual maintenance. With public contract improvements, final payment is not made until the project has been satisfactorily completed. However, on privately installed improvements, the City does not have the adequate resources or recourses available to insure the improvements are completed to required quality standards. With connection and use of the system required by the consecutive development of the land and related issuance of building permits, the system is authorized for use prior to final acceptance based on satisfactory compliance with City approved plans and specifications. Subsequently, there are several old privately installed improvements where concerns over the quality of parts of the work prevented the project acceptance from being previously recommended. In a joint review of the project by the engineering and maintenance divisions of the Public Works Department, it was decided that the project had met the "test of time" and should be formally accepted as substantially complying with the intent of the project plans and specifications and standard Eagan policies concerning the construction of public infrastructure facilities. The following is a list of projects that are being forwarded for formal acceptance for perpetual City maintenance. This will help clean up outstanding projects and allow the staff to dedicate more time towards corrections of deficiences on current privately installed improvements. PROJECT # SUBDIVISION DEVELOPER TYPE OF IMPROVEMENTS 83 -E PARK RIDGE Riverdale Dev. Corp. Streets & Utilities 83 -0 SUNSET 2ND Arlene R. Krecklau Streets & Utilities 83 -Q OAK CHASE 6TH Houston Const., Inc. Streets & Utilities 84 -I SUNSET 4TH Swe -Dun Property, Inc. Streets & Utilities 84 -K SUPER AMERICA Super America, Inc. Utilities 84 -L WINDTREE 3RD Lombard Prop. Inc. Utilities 84 -U SUNSET 5TH Joseph Hoffman Utilities 84 -W FLOUR BIN INTL. Flour Bin Intl. Utilities 85 -A WESCOTT HILLS REVISED 2ND ADD. Kendale, Inc. Utilities 85 -M WESCOTT HILLS 3RD Kendale, Inc. Streets & Utilities 86 -G SUNSET 7TH Calvary Memorial Services Church 86 -I SUNSET 11TH Tri -Land Prop., Inc. Streets & Utilities C.?{ Agenda Information Memo September 19, 1988, City Council Meeting PROJECT # SUBDIVISION DEVELOPER TYPE OF IMPROVEMENTS 86 -0 K CHARLES DEV. K Charles Dev. Storm Sewer 86 -P LEXINGTON PLACE Frontier - Midwest Services SOUTH 2ND Homes Corp. 87 -JJ PARK RIDGE ADD. Riverdale Dev. Corp. Miscellaneous (Default) In addition, the following 3 privately installed improvements have been properly installed according to City approved plans and specifications and properly verified by final inspections by representatives of the Public Works Maintenance and Engineering Divisions. PROJECT # SUBDIVISION DEVELOPER TYPE OF IMPROVEMENTS 86 -V FAWN RIDGE Sienna Streets & Utilities (PHASE II) 86 -FF FAWN RIDGE 2ND Sienna Streets & Utilities 87 -T PARKSIDE ADD. Point of Lexington Streets & Utilities Partnership ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the final acceptance of miscellaneous privately installed improvements for perpetual maintenance: 83- E,O,Q; 84- I,K,L,U,W; 85 -A,M; 86- G,I,O,P,V,FF; and 87 -T,JJ. CONTRACT 88 -37 /APPROVE PLANS /AUTHORIZE AD FOR BIDS (CUTTERS RIDGE & GENERAL ELECTRIC /UTILITIES) I. Contract 88 -37, Approve Plans /Authorize Advertisement for Bids (Cutters Ridge & General Electric - Utilities) -- Subsequent to the completion of the appropriate public hearing process or guarantees submitted with the original petition, the Council authorized the preparation of detailed plans and specifications for the installation of utilities necessary to service the Cutters Ridge development south of the Jim Horne property and the General Electric Supply Co. (GESCO) within the Eagandale Center Industrial Park. These plans have now been completed and are being presented to the Council for review and consideration of authorizing the advertisement for competitive bids solicitation. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the plans for Contract 88 -37 (Cutters Ridge & General Electric Supply Co. - Utilities) and authorize the advertisement for bid opening to be held at 11:00 a.m. on Friday, October 14, 1988. a L) Agenda Information Memo September 19, 1988, City Council Meeting FINAL PLAT APPROVAL /STRATFORD OAKS ADDITION J. Final Plat, Stratford Oaks Addition - -The staff has received a request for final plat approval for the Stratford Oaks Addition located in the southwest corner of Thomas Lake Road and Diffley Road as shown by the final plat map enclosed on page All conditions placed on the preliminary plat approval by Council action on April 19, 1988 have been satisfactorily complied with. All final plat application materials have been submitted, reviewed by staff and found to be in order for favorable Council action. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the final plat for the Stratford Oaks Addition and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute all related documents. .Q Agenda Information Memo September 19, 1988, City Council Meeting FINAL PLAT APPROVAL /BERRY RIDGE ADDITION K. Final Plat Approval, Berry Ridge Addition - -The staff has received an application for final plat approval for the Berry Ridge Addition located in the southeast corner of Berry Ridge Road and Hilltop Lane which is a replat from the original proposed multi -unit condominium complexes into single family development as shown by the map of the plat enclosed on page All conditions placed on the preliminary plat approval by uncil action on December 17, 1987 have been satisfactorily complied with. All final plat application materials have been submitted, reviewed by staff and found to be in order for favorable Council action. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approval the final plat for the Berry Ridge Addition and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute all related documents. 1 i I . 1 i31:.1:71: 1 4 li-3 g 1 it2.:-.3: i ; ii I f ., • Ig16,07.... "A i ! 0 3 25 -A "-"' I V P_Ii3-4Y121!j 3 3 i 3 i i li :4 ! !I iig.il!iglPii ill i 1 I I! 1!!1111ili I ' i 5 1 /1 :11!j;!t il 1 : 1 I.1 ;1 i ii !I ia 11 0 f :ii i. ! :3 IF. . .3 II.i ir 1 g ." Orr g ! g a:: II 2 4 ;1 .1 171/2 5 01 3124;2 5. 7 ; 1'5 11 5 (1 ) ••■•••.... t ; iv E 5 i 2 I Ij I i! I i i. E I 3. CL . \ —1 3 • 5 55 5 2 B f 22 r r --• 9 r 1 g 4 • G t 2 11 ! .31 4 - I 5 I 3 L.: --. --.. -- 'I • R 6 ...... Z:22----. •-•': I 0 ; — i : 01 / .) cm 0 1 ; t ; (..) .: / 2 1.1.1 / E f —..r.rn / \ / .s fr. 0 c7:!-. :: > / k • IT! 79.7 // - g!.: ..,-s • ;jr/-r // / •....,.... r 1 , CL i f / j'* / • . : V..= t - ...1.4:y.9--..-.-...... r , ,-..i.:, , ........„ „::: ......-,,,,,, : i 4.”.01..•••• I . I 1? .-.* ....- . -j ..'- v • • , e. . . ....... .C1 ■• 8 : ...._ v , 1 I ..1 / .00 ': I __ — I g 2 .721V1 d0.17-1Z.Z.L.7.=. ....- '. ......." ,- 1 ------- .....------------ :I 1 "a- --- I = 1 I W I 533 I 1 a 1 3 Agenda Information Memo September 19, 1988, City Council Meeting VACATION /DRAINAGE /UTILITY EASEMENT -LOT 8 /HILLTOP OF EAGAN L. Vacation, Drainage /Utility Easement -Lot 8, Hilltop of Eagan- - On September 6th, the public hearing was held to consider the vacation of the drainage and utility easement dedicated over the common lot area of Lot 8 of Hilltop of Efgan as shown by the description and graphic enclosed on page . Adequate drainage and utility easements incorporating the existing utilities are being rededicated as a part of the Berry Ridge Addition replat of this area. Because that final plat application was not in order for formal Council approval on September 6, the public hearing was closed but the approval of the easement vacation was continued until final plat approval could be processed for formal Council action which occurred earlier on this Consent Agenda. Therefore, it is now in order for favorable Council action regarding this vacation request. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the vacation of drainage and utility easements over Lot 8, Hilltop of Eagan and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute all related documents. SCALE : 1" : /AD' a 8 _ ELY OI 6 a. BO AD j2sg 4 � s /S a*" �u R. 11,4,e5 J n _. 1 .c , P M N s Qi cow SHADED AREA DENOTES REQUESTED \ . V' AREA TO BE VACATED % c°` ) t t 2 73.9tl Tl N 81- l7 0l' E DRAINAGE & UTILITY EASEMENT TO BE VACATED 0 All that part of Lot 8, Block 1, Hilltop of Eagan, Dakota County, Minnesota described as follows: Commencing at the most southwest corner of said Lot 8; thence on an assumed bearing North 00 degrees 05 minutes 35 seconds East, along the westerly line of said Lot 8, a distance of 106.51 feet; thence northerly continuing along said westerly line, a distance of 129.92 feet along a tangential curve concave to the west, having a radius of 557.02 feet and a central angle of 13 degrees 21 minutes 50 sec- onds; thence North 81 degrees 17 minutes 07 seconds East, not tangent to the last described curve, a distance of 273.88 feet; thence North 47 degrees 18 minutes 24 seconds East a distance of 52.71 feet; thence North 00 degrees 21 minutes 39 seconds East a distance of 107.00 feet to the point of beginning of the parcel to be described; thence North 89 degrees 38 minutes 21 seconds West a distance of 356.74 feet to said westerly line of Lot 8; thence northerly along said westerly line, a distance of 13.33 feet along a non - tangential curve concave to the east, having a radius of 333.33 feet, a central angle of 02 degrees 17 minutes 30 seconds and a chord which bears North 00 degrees 47 minutes 06 seconds West; thence North 00 degrees 21 minutes 39 seconds East, tangent to the last described curve and continuing along said westerly line, a distance of 297.95 feet to the most northwest corner of said Lot 8; thence easterly along the northerly line of said Lot 8, a distance of 93.68 feet along a non - tangential curve, concave to the south having a radius of 237.46 feet, a central angle of 22 degrees 36 minutes 13 seconds and a chord which bears South 60 degrees 01 minute 23 seconds East; thence South 48 degrees 43 minutes 16 seconds East tangent to the last described curve and continuing along said northerly line, a distance of 50.00 feet; thence easterly, continuing along said northerly line a distance of 254.63 feet along a tangential curve, concave to the north having a radius of 264.05 feet and a central angle of 55 degrees 15 minutes 04 seconds; thence South 00 degrees 21 minutes 39 seconds West, not tangent to the last described curve, a distance of 176.23 feet to the point of beginning and there terminating. 1,t);;1" Agenda Information Memo September 19, 1988, City Council Meeting FINAL PYMT /ACCEPTANCE /GOPHER EAGAN INDUSTRIAL PK M. Contract 87 -40, Final Payment /Acceptance (Gopher Eagan Industrial Park 2nd Addition - Streets & Utilities)- -Staff has received a request for final payment from the contractor for the above- referenced improvements from our consulting engineering firm (BRAA) along with the certification of compliance with City approved plans and specifications. All final inspections have been verified by representatives of the Public Works Engineering & Maintenance Departments and found to be in order for favorable Council action. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM:To approve the fifth and finial payment for Contract 87 -40 (Gopher Eagan Industrial Park 2nd Addition - Streets & Utilities) to Austin P. Keller Construction Company, Inc., in the amount of $7,317.39 and accept the project for perpetual City maintenance. FINAL PYMT /ACCEPTANCE /WINDTREE 8TH ADDN N. Contract 87 -19, Final Payment /Acceptance (Windtree 8th Addition - Streets & Utilities) - -Staff has received a request for final payment from the contractor for the above - referenced improvements from our consulting engineering firm (BRAA) along with the certification of compliance with City approved plans and specifications. All final inspections have been verified by representatives of the Public Works Engineering & Maintenance Departments and found to be in order for favorable Council action. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the fifth and final payment for Contract 87 -19 (Windtree 8th Addition - Streets & Utilities) to Austin P. Keller Construction Company, Inc., in the amount of $13,905.88 and accept the project for perpetual City maintenance. APPROVE CHANGE ORDER #1 (UPS) O. Contract 85 -18, Approve Change Order #1 (UPS - Streets & Utilities)- -This Change Order provides for the construction of storm sewer which discharges into the pond located on the eastern edge of this facility. It required the installation of a safety grate /trash guard for this 36" diameter storm sewer to discourage unauthorized entry into this system. This results in additional cost of $1,398.74 which would be the responsibility of the trunk storm sewer fund. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve Change Order #1 to Contract 85 -18 (UPS 1st Addition - Streets & Utilities) and authorize the execution by the Mayor and City Clerk. Agenda Information Memo September 19, 1988, City Council Meeting CANCEL PROJ /PENDING ASSMT (BRITTANY 10TH ADDN) P. Cancel Project & Pending Assessments (Brittany 10th Addition - Trunk Water Main) - -This project provided for the extension of trunk water main facilities from the Hillcrest and Walden Heights Addition southwest of Cliff and Pilot Knob Road through the proposed Brittany 10th Addition interconnecting with the existing trunk main in the Brittany 9th Addition. It was originally anticipated that the extension of this trunk water main would provide an alternate source of water necessitated by the reconstruction of Cliff and Pilot Knob Roads. However, difficulties in obtaining an agreement on the alignment and related utility easements from the affected property owners combined with an alternative design of the Pilot Knob /Cliff Road project, this trunk water main extension is no longer necessary and can occur coincidental with the development of the presently unplatted property at a later date. Therefore, it is appropriate that this project be officially cancelled and the pending assessments be removed from the record. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To cancel Project 513 (Brittany 10th Addition - Trunk Water Main) and remove all pending assessments of record.. CANCEL PROJ /PENDING ASSMTS (COUNTRY CLUB MKT) Q. Project 449, CancelProject /Pending Assessments (Country Club Market - Driveway Extension) -- Several years ago, the Council was concerned regarding the landscape screening, accessibility and maintenance of the private access road from Cedarvale Boulevard through the Country Club Market loading dock area. Several public hearings were held with subsequent negotiations with the owners of the supermarket to try and resolve the issue. Strong objections were expressed to provide the driveway extension and new connection to Cedarvale Boulevard between Country Club Market and Rax Restaurant. Country Club Market subsequently performed the required landscaping leaving only the driveway extension portion of the project to be performed by the City. Further investigations of the ownership of the property affected by the proposed project found that there was inadequate right -of -way to perform the work and with the reluctance of the affected property owner, acquisition would have to be obtained through condemnation. This would have added substantially to the cost of the project potentially affecting the ability to assess these costs based on benefits received. Therefore, the staff is recommending that the driveway extension improvement under Project 449 be formally considered for cancellation. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve /deny the cancellation of Project 449 (Country Club Market - Driveway Extension) and, if cancelled, the removal of the related pending assessments. 3`t Agenda Information Memo September 19, 1988, City Council Meeting •PUBL•IC HEARINGS VACATION /PARTIAL RIGHT OF WAY /MENDOTA WAGON RD A. Vacation of Partial Right -of -Way (Mendota Wagon Road) - -On August 16, the Council received a petition from the Riverview Development Company requesting the vacation of a partial right- of-way known as Mendota Wagon Road located in the northeast corner of the intersection of Lone Oak Road and railroad overpass a2 by the graphic and legal description enclosed on page Enclosed on page 3 7 is a letter from a representative of the Northern States Power Company (NSP) expressing concerns about the impact of this vacation on their existing overhead power distribution lines located within this public right -of -way. If appropriate, the condition could be placed on the execution of the resolution vacating this public right -of -way that either a public utility easement be retained for the existing overhead power line or that a formal document be drafted conveying those easement rights for that existing facility. It is anticipated that our City Attorney will be able to provide direction regarding the best method during the public hearing portion of this item. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To close the public hearing and deny /approve (with conditions if appropriate) the vacation of a partial right -of -way for Mendota Wagon Road and, if approved, authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute all related documents when appropriate. 3 Y/T a 0) N • C v 0 C 0 C.0 a 1.1 m u 0 0 . V .1 a • - ..1 0 7 CO 0 » N 0.2 c .0 0 a L. > -..y . 7 aST ro 3 a d C. O m 02 0) N U m 0 O 0 %. aw .c m e m • O 0 1... O +, 0 7 a 0 1. z m a 0 c U ID 0.' 0 3 GU bt N •C O .. 't7 to ., m m ., F C .0 3 o v ID. 0 n m 4.1 I A O roC.,C°CC • 0 1,0 LC C a m 0 0 0 •.t c a c a.. as c .. C m 0 0 • I. " 0 ^' C 3 V A N h w 0 A ID Lev,. ° 0 2 C 0 O.c m OTC 0 0 C .'� O .0 0 L. C o y 'a D _. C .0 0 � .0 m y •.. 0 • y .0 ID 1. 0 10 V. a. 7 0.. O 0 w 0 a c� ° 1.. .� CZ. M N T r /. 7 m a 0 m a n m •ti • t • 0 0 . N 0 .. O a 0. G +' m C..' 17 z typ ro C 0 •n /. C >. 0 C O y 0 .0Z m 2- m CI C f0 0 C 0 � C m7 c 0. a 0 L. 0 O 0 0. 0 •■ C 0. 7 m 4, 3 m 0 • E a CO +0 m y 1. 0 M y . 0. 0 a • 0 .0 • 0 0 .. C C 0 0 003 O ID >.m 1. 4 1. a m a4 7 a m m 0 C.+ C '' 0 • .1 N L. 0 O t7 a 0 > E 7 to ti W C C U 7 ID i ; L .0 O y y m f 0 C 0 E a C L h „ m N .0 0 .+ o . W O C 0. a.. 00� a1 C •0 0.. C x 0 0 m .c 'O U m 0 m E m 0 1 z 0 A e A F 17 O z C z r0 0 N F to W .. O •a 3(0 y .) tp m a a .0 .0 ., y 0 0 z 0 0. a a t 0 0 e v m pp O 0 m a 1 ..' 1. 7 O 0 z c� . • 0 ►. 4.. o 0 a a c ; y i. 7 0 O = t0. • "1 6 H a _ W ry •� * 4lnos aqa )o 6/i leuatn a 4l Jo au)T lsaM .... G o0 1 CC • CO 'O N O 0 0 C a z VpC Y 0 t0 I 0 ) U September 15, 1988 Michael P. Foertsch Assistant City Engineer 3830 Pilot Knob Road P. O. Box 21199 Eagan, MN 55121 Dear Mr. Foertsch: NSP has a 60 pole located in the intersection of the C.M. St. P. & P right of way and the highway (Lone Oak Road C.S. A.H. No 26) right of way. This point appears to be located in Northeast quarter of the Northeast quarter of section 11. This pole carries a main line feeder from our Lone Oak substation and crosses the railroad line. We request any vacation pro- ceedings contain an easement allowing NSP to retain its rights to keep this pole as it presently exists. Relocation of it would be most difficult due to the terrain in the area and required clearances. Costs involved with relocation if pos- sible, would have to be paid by the new property owner, or the City of Eagan. Should you have any questions, call Dan Schultz NSP Customer Service Representative at 458 -1254 or me at 458 -1228. Sincerely, Re: Vacation - Mendota Wagon Road ,‘,1%,,,,.// Robert H. Schmall Community Service Manager RHS /dj Northern States Power Company Newport Area 3000 Maxwell Avenue Newport, Minnesota 55055 -1001 Telephone (612) 459 -5580 Agenda Information Memo September 19, 1988, City Council Meeting VACATION /PARTIAL RIGHT -OF- WAY /(PORTION OF CEDARVALE DRIVE) B. Vacation, Partial Right -of -Way (Portion of Cedarvale Drive) - -In response to a request from the Public Works Department, on August 16th, the City Council authorized a formal public hearing to be held to consider the vacation of a portion of the public right -of -way for Cedarvale Drive located between Shelard National Bank and the Parranto office building complex in the northwest corner of Rahn Road and Beau- e-Rue Drive as shown by the sketch enclosed on page However, before the City could proceed with vacating a pu lic right -of -way, it would be necessary to insure that adequate cross easements and maintenance agreements had been executed between all the affected private property owners to insure that the City does not create a landlock situation. These agreements have not been reached at this time and may take considerable communication and efforts to achieve that end result. Therefore, the staff is requesting that the public hearing be closed and that no formal action be taken until this issue can be readdressed at a later date through a new public hearing process. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To close the public hearing and take no action regarding the vacation of public right -of -way for a portion of Cedarvale Drive. 38 r O • a l .1 1 1•: • r L11,f 7 v RAHN ROAD 6.32 6.y .10 50 • L.51.95 ` • �I 111.•0•52.22'W. 1.69.57 646•5+2Y , t6Ln 1319 L,27 76 • 027.76 .V -_ _ 42.29 • �� 6.1°57' 1 ••`8 1: : 1 Py 1 '.1* :::::;1:• :;::: : : : :1: 4 N O 4 N.4o•32'z2W 76.34 1 h 0 O x.30 - 3..60 ; 116.57 116.53 - �`%i \ Y k 81.40.52'22`W. 195.67 N.40•5242 81.49 67.03 70.02 0 R to 0 0 72.79 I ' ' 1440 W N.40•52'22`W. Q t Q LLI = o O O 69.24 r 73.01 ..•4444 m.40•92'22 O 8..60.52'22 W. 8 a 7 .E • < o N Q on t n O n .1vrr..�n' O t ~ 0 ; ▪ i •• _ :: 65.69 1 J '4 76.00 8..60 22`W. L 8.10 °Si 22`W. 4 -1 V 0 a 8 C N i 0 0 ~ O _ CC 3 -' Q W CD 0 ... 62.14 < t• 79.99 •.•.:.:�'.•.-. N.60.3222W. 8..60°52'22 "W. 2 tQ LLI = Q • o0 . O ci IA O 1 0 62.06 11.40.52 0 a O O 114.49 3.40.5242 • • 9 A • It o 33 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: The 375' of Cedarvale Drive between Rahn Road and Cedarvale Shopping Center. Agenda Information Memo September 19, 1988, City Council Meeting PRETTYMAN HEIGHTS /STREETS C. Project 543, Prettyman Heights - Streets (To Be Continued To October 6)- -This project provides for the construction and installation of streets necessary to service the Prettyman Heights development located at the western extension of Skyline Road and east of the Rustic Hills development. Due to the unresolved status of negotiations with MnDOT for financial participation in the upgrading of the trunk highway frontage road portion of this project, a financial impact of special assessments on benefitted properties could not be accurately determined in time for the public hearing scheduled for September 19. Therefore, it is the staff's recommendation that this public hearing be continued until October 6 when this information can be properly incorporated into the feasibility report presentation of the proposed improvements and related financing. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To continue the public hearing for Project 543 (Prettyman Heights - Streets) to October 6,, 1988. Agenda Information Memo September 19, 1988, City Council Meeting FINAL ASSESSMENT HEARING /MISCELLANEOUS P C Final Assessment Hearing /Miscellaneous -- Twelve projects have had their final assessment rolls prepared with the public hearing scheduled for September 19th. 1,255 parcels were assessed a total of $7,551,586.41, with City trunk funds financing $485,326.94. All assessments were levied in accordance with City policies and /or the methods defined in the feasibility report presented at the projects' respective public hearing. All notices for these final assessment hearings were sent to all affected property owners informing them of their proposed final assessment obligations. In addition, all notices were published in the legal newspaper as required by State statute. The Public Works Director will provide a brief introduction with specific generic statements for each project and will be available to answer questions during this public hearing. On several projects, staff has received either verbal or written objections to the proposed assessments. Those written objections received to date are enclosed with the appropriate summary of the final assessment rolls provided on pages 912. through 47 Each projects' public hearing should be individually addressed with specific action taken on each item. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To close the public hearing and approve the final assessment roll for Project 496, Brittany 10th Addition - Trunk storm sewer, except any specific parcels, and authorize the certification to the County for collection. Similar action to the above is also necessary for each of the following projects: Project 517, St. Francis Woods 6th Addition, Streets and Utilities Project 500, Eagan Royale /Briar Oarks -Trunk Utilities Project 461, Yankee Doodle Road, I -35E to Lexington Avenue - Streets Project 516, Gopher Eagan 2nd Addition - Streets and Utilities Project 485, Northview Park Road - Streets and Utilities Project 494, East Wescott Road - Streets and Utilities Project 491, Eagan Hills Farm - Streets and Utilities Project 498, Stafford Place- Streets and Utilities Project 499, Chapel Hill Baptist Church - Street Project 473, Pilot Knob Road - Trunk Storm Sewer Project 506, Parkcliff 2nd Addition -Storm Sewer PROJECT NO: 496 SUBDIVISION /AREA: BRITTANY 10TH ADDITION FIN..L ASSESSMENT HEARINC: SEPTEMBER 19, 1988 IMPROVEMENTS INSTALLED AND /OR ASSESSED: F.R. = Feasibility Report FINAL F.R. WATER RATES RATES • O Area ['Laterals ['Service Lat. Benefit/ Trunk STOR11 . rea 0 Lateral NUMBER OF PARCELS AFFECTED: NUMBER OF YEARS ASSESSED: RATE OF INTEREST: TOTAL AMOUNT ASSESSED: TOTAL AMOUNT CITY FINANCED: $0.053 /sf $0.05'3 /sf PUBLIC HEARING DATE: JULY 7, 1987 FINAL ASSESSMENT HEARING 33 15 9.0. Laterals O Service 0 Lac. Benefit/ Trunk STREETS Q Gravel Base Surfacing O Res. Equiv. • $125,277.89 (F.R. = $273,654) $ 82,428.35 CONSTRUCTED UNDER TILE FOLLOWING CONTRACTS: 87 -35 14; FINAL F.R. SANITARY RATES RATES 0 Area PROJECT NO: 517 SUBDIVISION /AREA: ST. FRANCIS WOOD 6TH ADDITION FINAL ASSESSMENT HEARING: SEPTEMBER 19, 1988 IMPROVEMENTS INSTALLED AND/OR ASSESSED: F.R. = Feasibility Report FINAL F.R. WATER RATES RATES • 0 Area Q Lace rals $1,543.55/lot $2 QService $ 839.90/lot $1,030 /lot Water E Sanitary El Lac. Benefit/ Trunk STORM. E] Area Lateral NUMBER OF PARCELS AFFECTED: NUMBER OF YEARS ASSESSED: RATE OF INTEREST: $1,726.95/lot ;2,214/1ot TOTAL AMOUNT CITY FINANCED: PUBLIC HEARING DATE: OCTOBER 6, 1987 FINAL ASSESSMENT HEARING 34 5 TOTAL AMOUNT ASSESSED: $324,945.14 (F.R. _ $383,928) -0- 9.0% SANITARY D Area Laterals 0 Service 0 Lac. Benefit/ Trunk El STREETS Q Gravel Base Surfacing 0 Res. Equiv. ' CONSTRUCTED UNDER THE FOLLOWING CONTRACTS: 87 -41 1 FINAL F.R. RATES RATES $1,894.51/lot $2,075/lot $3.552.30/1ot $3.779/lot PROJECT NO: 500 SUBDIVISION /AREA: BRIAR OAKS /EAGAN ROYALE FINAL ASSESSMENT HEARING: SEPTEMBER 19, 1988 IMPROVEMENTS INSTALLED AND /OR ASSESSED: F.R. = Feasibility Report FINAL F.R. WATER RATES RATES 0 Area Q Laterals Q service Q l.ac. Benefit/ Trunk STORK . [2] Area 0 Lateral NUMBER OF PARCELS AFFECTED: NUMBER OF YEARS ASSESSED: RATE OF INTEREST: TOTAL AMOUNT ASSESSED: $0.053 /sf 74 15 9.0% TOTAL AMOUNT CITY FINANCED: $ 38,317.67 0 Laterals 0 Service FINAL ASSESSMENT HEARING CONSTRUCTED UNDER THE FOLLOWING CONTRACTS: 88 -14 PUBLIC', HEARING DATE: AUGUST 18, 1988 FINAL F.R. SANITARY RAT1?S RATES O Area 0] Lac Benefit/ $30.12/1f Trunk STREETS ['Gravel Base O Surfacing 0 Res. Equiv. • $226,252.83 (F.R. = $234,081) 1 $ 30.12/1f PROJECT NO: 461 SUBDIVISION /AREA: YANKEE DOODLE ROAD FINAL ASSESSMENT BEARING: STORM . ID Area ® Latera1 NUMBER OF PARCELS AFFECTED: NUMBER OF YEARS ASSESSED: RATE OF INTEREST: TOTAL AMOUNT ASSESSED: TOTAL AMOUNT CITY FINANCED: FINAL ASSESSMENT' HEARING SEPTEMBER 6, 1988 IMPROVEMENTS INSTALLED AND /OR ASSESSED: F.R. Feasibility Report Continued to SLY 1'L•MISLR 19, 1988 FINAL F.R. FINAL F.R. WATER RATES RATES SANITARY RATES RATES 0 Area Area ['Laterals Laterals lu p Q Service $47.314.63 $43.160 s,p DService Water & Sanitary D UE. Benefit/ D Lat. Benefit/ Trunk Trunk 17 • 10 9.07 The total amount due is $194,710.86. $134,667.52 STREETS $ 9.20 sF $ /.I9 /tt s 17.27 sf ; 13.50 /ff m Surfacing $ 21.3P C/I 16.7 ? /ff C I PUBLIC HEARING DATE: February 4, 1986 Q Gravel Base Res. Equiv. X Trail ' CONSTRUCTED UNDER THE FOLLOWING CONTRACTS: County 28 -10 $674 841.41 (F_R_ - tSS1,717 99) L is` (, "C L/ - I q _y 33. 15JtF sF $ 33./5/tt st 78.45/ff C/I $$ 78.65/ff C/I $ 11.81 /ff $ 11.81 /ff $ •16.13 /ff Parcel No. 10- 01000 -77 O'Neil prd erty is in the process of being rezoned. They have not been assessed for trail in th 3 report. Amount due if rezoned is 3445.6 x $11.81 = $40,692.54 $40,692.54 for trailway and 3445.6' x ($78.45- $33.75)=$154,018.32 for streets. PRO.: ECT NO: IMPR3VEM£NTS INSTALLED AND /OR ASSESSED: F.R. = Feasibility Report WATER 0 Area Laterals Service $3243.31/sery $3523 /sery Sanitary & Water El Lat. Benefit/ Trunk STORM. Area 516 $29778 is $29600 Is Lateral $2973.924/arre $2891 /acre NUMBER OF PARCELS AFFECTED: NUMBER OF YEARS ASSESSED: RATE OF INTEREST: TOTAL AMOUNT ASSESSED: TOTAL AMOUNT CITY FINANCED: PUBLIC HEARING DATE: FINAL F.R. RATES RATES $18.75/ff $28.82/ff FINAL ASSESSMENT HEARING SUBCIVISION /AREA: GOPHER EAGAN INDUSTRIAL PARK 2ND ADDITION FINAL ASSESSMENT HEARING: SEPTEMBER 19, 1988 20 10 9.07 CONSTRUCTED UNDER THE FOLLOWING CONTRACTS: October 6, 1987 FINAL F.R. SANITARY RATES RATES 0 Area [2]Laterals $15.36/ff $22.83/ff O Service Lac. Benefit/ Trunk STREETS Cravel Base $53.357/ff $51.28/ff USurfacing $109.489/ff $125.02/ff 0 Res. Equiv. • $354,226.84 (F.R. = $406,508) $103,931.98 87 -40 FL`ZLL+ e PROJECT NO: SUBDIVISION /AREA: LEXINGTON SQUARE 6TH ADDITION FINAL ASSESSMENT HEARING: SEPTEMBER 19, 1988 IMPROVEMENTS INSTALLED AND /OR ASSESSED: F.R. = Feasibility Report WATER • ® Area $1,190 /ac 41,190 /ac , $1,479 /lump $2,796 /lump Laterals $7,827.04/sum $6,550 /sur $763.81 /Sery $998 /Sery Service $4741.97/Sery $5315 /Seri. Sanitary & Water Lac. Benefit/$11.88 /£f $11.881ff Trunk STORK . Area 485 Lateral $13.986/ff $20.46/ff NUMBER OF PARCELS AFFECTED: NUMBER OF YEARS ASSESSED: RATE OF INTEREST: TOTAL AMOUNT CITY FINANCED: PUBLIC HEARING DATE: FINAL ASSESSMENT HEARING FINAL F.R. FINAL F.R. RATES RATES SANITARY RATES RATES 97 10 9.07, $ 4,962.24 CONSTRUCTED UNDER THE FOLLOWING CONTRACTS: December 16, 1986 0 Area 0 Service 0 Lat. Benefit/ Trunk STREETS [:]Gravel Base e Laterals TOTAL AMOUNT ASSESSED: $517.584.24 (F.R. = $597.936) 87 -12 $1522.05/lot $1672/lot lump lump Surfacing $18372.10/sum $15900 /sum Res. Equiv. ' $, 33.75/ff $ 33.75/ff SUBDIVISION /AREA: WESCOTT ROAD IMPROVEMENTS INSTALLED AND /OR ASSESSED: F.R. = Feasibility Report WATER E Area Laterals Er Service Cost Cost $ 6.24/ff $ 6.24/ff ErLat. Benefit/ $ 6.95/ff 6.95/ff Trunk $20.55/ff $20.55/ff STORM . Area Lateral TOTAL AMOUNT ASSESSED: • FINAL F.R. RATES RATES $1250 /ac $1250 /ac $0.053/sf $0.053/sf $10.30 /ff $10.30 /ff $43,982.88 1S $41078 1 $29,016.47 is $25902 1 NUMBER OF PARCELS AFFECTED: 577 NUMBER OF YEARS ASSESSED: 15 RATE OF INTEREST: TOTAL AMOUNT CITY FINANCED: —0— PUBLIC HEARING DATE: APRIL 21, 1987 FINAL ASSESSMENT HEARING PROJECT NO: 494 in combination with Project 491 FINAL ASSESSMENT HEARING: SEPTEMBER 19, 1988 9.0% SANITARY D Area © Laterals 0 Service STREETS $1,223,957.31 (F.R. = $1,224,083) CONSTRUCTED UNDER THE FOLLOWING CONTRACTS: 87 -15, 87 -26, 88 -03 4 FINAL RATES F.R. RATES $50.652.10 is $ 45,210 ls, Lat. Benefit/ $ '30.17/rlf $ 10.17 /rlf Trunk ['Gravel Base ® Surfacing © Res. Equiv. l Trailway $ 60.78/ff $ 60.78/ff $ 30.99/ff $ 30.99/ff $ 20.28/ff $ 20.28/ff r$ 17.72/ff $ 17.72/ff 1„$ 35.44/ff $ 35.44/ff $ 12.40 /ff $ 12.40 /ff PROJECT NO: 491 in combination with Project 494 SUBDIVISION /AREA: EAGAN HILLS FARMS FINAL ASSESSMENT HEARING: SEPTEMBER 19, 1988 IMPROVEMENTS INSTALLED AND /OR ASSESSED: F.R. = Feasibility Report FINAL F.R. RATES RATES Area $1 ?sn /., $199n /ar WATER Q Laterals EI Service STORM. $38,894.35 —0— $ 240.91 /ser $ 481.82/ser $360 /s'r $30,885.68/ser Lat. Benefit/ $ 6.24/ff 4 Trunk $ 7,09 /ff $ 7.09 /ff Area Lateral $0.051 /sf $15.73/ff $21.85/ff $202,296.10 is NUMBER OF PARCELS AFFECTED: NUMBER OF YEARS ASSESSED: RATE OF INTEREST: TOTAL AMOUNT ASSESSED: TOTAL AMOUNT CITY FINANCED: PUBLIC HEARING DATE: FINAL ASSESSMENT' HEARING $0.051 /ff $34.60/ff $21.17/ff $i68,900 is 540 15 9.07, —0— APRIL 21, 1987 SANITARY ®Area 0 Service STREETS Laterals Lat. Benefit/ $ 25.06/ff ,$ 15 nh /ff Trunk 0 Cravel Base FINAL RATES F.R. RATES $1 "i0/a` $1100/1r $0.570.42 — n— Ca SurfacinS $77,hh7 nn + 0 $ 1.886/ff —0— Res. Equiv. ' $11.40/ff $11.40/ff $2,570,193.97 (F.R. = t2 77R_h7,) CONSTRUCTED UNDER THE FOLLOWING CONTRACTS: 87 -14, 87 -21, 87 -22, 87 -23. 87 -25. 86 -03 �.q Lit_ e 1-61) faiti) 61--- ) () pqq1, ,mac tilik . O 7/o y ;L &Y0 peril th- ; - fr d huuci, 44) a1,6--atc ,cdyt> (,k / ' J I 'vt,✓ /� 3 t /Q � J Oro a. Oq Luiz_ 60.0 ._,-6-777-3 To: Mr. E. J. VanOverbeke, City -Clerk --City of Eagan Sept 1988 Please accept this letter of objection to the notice of assessment to 8 75 Wescott Rd. Eagan. We feel it is too high to benifit the value of our property. We have been told by a person in the special assessments offt a that this letter would be adequite to propose an objection. Sincerly, Ed and Ellen Kalal (property Owners of 875 Wescott) i1aC -t. AA i To: Mr. E. J. VanOver'eke, City- Clerk -- City of Eagan Please accept this letter of objection to the notice of assessment to 871 Wescott Rd. Eagan. We feel it is too high to benifit the value of our property. We have been told by a person in the special assessments office that this letter would be adequite to propose an objection. S Sept. 14, 1988 ncerel , • and oAnn Mueller property owners at 871 Wescott Rd) September 12, 1988 City Clerk City of Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55122 RE: Special Assessments 10 -01- 400 - 020 -78 Richard and Clarice Lutz 825 Wescott Road Eagan, MN 55123 This notice constitutes formal written objection by us to the amount of assessments to be levied against our property. The proposed assessment of $14,348.80 far exceeds the special benefit our property will derive from the improvement. Respectfully submitted, 'Richard Lutz Clarice Lutz PROJECT NO: 498 SUBDIVISION /AREA: STAFFORD PLACE FINAL ASSESSMENT HEARING: SEPTEMBER 19, 1988 IMPROVEMENTS INSTALLED AND /OR ASSESSED: F.R. = Feasibility Report FINAL F.R. WATER RATES RATES $1250 /acre $12567777e © Area $3170 /acre El Laterals $14.336/ff $17.09 /ff lump lu Service $8363.44 sum $12,600 su Sanitary & $6.24/ff $6.24/ff LatW refit /$12. $12.47 /ff Trunk $20.55/ff STORM . ® Area © Lateral $2-053/sf $6.90 /ff $33.172 ff $21.363/ff NUMBER OF PARCELS AFFECTED: NUMBER OF YEARS ASSESSED: RATE OF INTEREST: TOTAL. AMOUNT ASSESSED: TOTAL AMOUNT CITY FINANCED: FINAL ASSESSMENT HEARING $0.053 /sf $0.079 /sf $7.36/ff $34.22/ff $10.30 /ff 189 15 9.0% —0— CONSTRUCTED UNDER THE FOLLOWING CONTRACTS: SANITARY © Area 0 Laterals np 'n OService PUBLIC HEARING DATE: May 19, 1987 © Lat. Benefit/ $15.06 Trunk STREETS 0 Cravel Base © Surfacing 0 Res. Equiv. • $1,303,512.61 (F.R. _ $1,394,699) 87 -24, 87 -25, 88 -03 FINAL F.R. RATES RATES $1,300.00 $1300 /acre $15.06 /ff $38.356/ff $55.35/ff $45.915/ff $41.91 /ff $11.41 /ff $11.41 /ff , $22.81/ff $22.81/ff $17.62/ff $17.62/ff PROJECT NO: SUBDIVISION /AREA: CHAPEL HILL ADDITION FINAL ASSESSMENT HEARING: SEPTEMBER 6, 1988 IMPROVEMENTS INSTALLED AND /OR ASSESSED: F.R. = Feasibility Report FINAL F.R. WATER RATES RATES • Fi Area ['Laterals ['Service Ei Lac. Benefit/ Trunk STORM. Area ['Lateral 499 NUMBER OF PARCELS AFFECTED: NUMBER OF YEARS ASSESSED: RATE OF INTEREST: TOTAL AMOUNT CITY FINANCED: $0.079 /sf 10.079/sf $3,748.467/ac $3293.12/ac ($0.0861/sf) ($0.0756/sf) FINAL ASSESSMENT HEARING 3 15 TOTAL AMOUNT ASSESSED: $ 89,825.46 (F.R.= $73,800) CONSTRUCTED UNDER THE FOLLOWINC CONTRACTS: PUBLIC HEARING DATE: Continued to SEPTEMBER 19, 1988 July 21, 1987 FINAL F.R. SANITARY RATES RATES 0 Area Laterals ['Service 0 Lac. Benefit/ Trunk STREETS 9.0! —0— O Gravel Base 0 Res. Equiv. ' 87 -32C C $ 33.267/ff Surfacing $ 54.136/ff $24.92/ff / ✓ -630 PRDJECT NO: 471 IMPROVEMENTS INSTALLED AND /OR ASSESSED: F.R. = Feasibilicy Reporc (1) Parcel use changed NUMBER OF PARCELS AFFECTED: NUMBER OF YEARS ASSESSED: RATE OF INTEREST: FINAL ASSESSMENT' HEARING SUBDIVISION /AREA: PILOT KNOB ROAD TRUNK STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENT FINAL ASSESSMENT HEARING: SEPTEMBER 19, 1988 FINAL F.R. FINAL F.R. WATER RATES RATES SANITARY RATES RATES CI Area DArea E Latera1s D Laterals D ervice Service C ' Lac. Benefit/ D Lac. Benefit/ Trunk Trunk Regional STOFN . Park $ .025 $ .025/s STREETS SF .05 .05 /sf © Area Large Lot $825/16500sf $825/165..sf ❑ Cravel Base C/I (1) $.075 El Lateral •, v Surfacing Q Res. Equiv. ' 51 15 9.0% TOTAL AMOUNT ASSESSED: $206,465.44 TOTAL AMOUNT CITY FINANCED: $ 87,600.66 CONSTRUCTED UNDER THE FOLLOWINC CONTRACTS: 87 -6 PUBLIC HEARING DATE: July 15, 1986 , r . , /, — ,- . 1 ., /7 . i ) "' AC— LL (.) 1 It-LCE, .L_ da x..4.44 _471/4-To _ Mk- _ 1 (-,,' )7L_. • ,...■ / i ',/—t,, 7 7 :.. fitrr 913 .. __.( i ,,4_,.L 4,.. _ ,- , L, . ,_„,,,;( ,.. _ o / ,_. L - _ ), .... ,..___„. ...,.......) 4 / ) /„-)L,,.., ( 71 %)( tea. 1 ck- E. J. VanOverbeke City Clerk - City of Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55122 Dear Mr. VanOverbeke: 1280 Deerwood Dr. Eagan, MN 55123 September 12, 1988 This letter is notification that we object to the proposed assessment of trunk storm sewer improvements under Project 473 to our property (10- 02200 - 014 -54). As you are well aware, the Minnesota courts have stated that "a special assessment may not exceed the benefit the property receives from the improvement. If it does, the result is a taking of property in violation of the fourteenth amendment." [Special Assessment for Maplewood Public Project No. 78 -10 v. City of Maplewood, 358 N.W.2d 106- 103, Minnesota, 1984.] Furthermore, "the real measure of benefits is the increase in the market value of the land as the result of the improvement." It is obvious that the benefits in the case of Project 473 apply only to the properties directly adjacent to the newly widened Pilot Knob Road and to the city's Hilltop Park on the south side of Mooney Lake, which had a bike path underwater. There is no benefit at all to our property. However, the above - mentioned properties are not the ones being assessed. The city has chosen to assess enough neighboring landowners to cover the cost of the project, which is illegal. At previous meetings it has been implied that water drains from our property into Mooney Lake, and this must be drained out. This is quite a weak claim, since our property is undeveloped, and has many trees on the slope which would drain into Mooney Lake. The amount of water draining into the lake is miniscule compared to the concrete area of Hilltop Estates and the newly widened Pilot Knob Road. Even if we were to agree to the assumption that some of our property drains into the storm sewer project, we have previous experience that the city overcharges marginally affected landowners for such improvements. In 1984, the city proposed to assess our property $51,375 for Project 417, the Birch Park Addition utility and street improvements. This included a charge of $6661 for storm sewer. After hiring an attorney and an appraiser, the total assessment was reduced in 1986 to $13,992.23, with the storm sewer portion reduced to $1666.27. We see then that the city had attempted to assess us an amount 300% higher than the lawful amount for the storm sewer. The storm sewer assessment for Project 417 was based on a 481 ft. front footage, and the estimate that 3.68 acres (74 %) of our property drained to the north. One might be interested to compare to the south side of our property, which has 229 ft. front footage and 26% of our land draining into the project area. By simple proportion to the legal assessment we fought many months for on Project 417, it appears the legal storm sewer assessment for the current Project 473 would be under $600 by an acreage comparison and under $800 by a front footage comparison. Therefore the assessment proposed by the city is once again at least 300% higher than the fair and legal amount. We request that the city have an appraiser determine any possible added value to our property from this project. We ourselves see no value added to our property, and the appraiser we hired for the previous project ( #417) has already said he sees no added market value to our property, and therefore we claim it is an illegal special assessment. cc: Victor Ellison, Mayor of Eagan Sincerely, /iertk T■jr ,zeda d - Bernard S. Fritz Teresa A. Fritz The Honorable Bea Blomquist Mayor City of Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, Minn. 55121 Dear Mayor Blomquist: July 15th, 1986 Please accept this letter as my protest of any assessment on my property which is identified as Parcel #011 -86 on Figure No. 2 of the Preliminary Notice. 60 Re: Assessment for Project 473 Very truly yours, Thomas Bergin 1 PROJECT NO: 506 SUBDIVISION /AREA: PARKCLIFF 2ND ADDITION FINAL ASSESSMENT HEARING: SEPTEMBER 19, 1988 IMPROVEMENTS INSTALLED AND /OR ASSESSED: F.R. = Feasibility Report FINAL F.R. FINAL F.R. WATER RATES RATES SANITARY RATES RATES Area ['Area ['Laterals Q Laterals ['Service D Service E1 Lac. Benefit/ _ ©Lat. Benefit/ Trunk Trunk STORM. 0 Area Lateral NUMBER OF PARCELS AFFECTED: NUMBER OF YEARS ASSESSED: RATE OF INTEREST: TOTAL AMOUNT ASSESSED: PUBLIC HEARING DATE: FINAL ASSESSMENT HEARING STREETS D Gravel Base $ 471.01 /lot $673.91/lot 0Surfacing D es. Equiv. • 46 10 9.0% TOTAL AMOUNT CITY FINANCED: $ 10,833.54 CONSTRUCTED UNDER THE FOLLOWING CONTRACTS: AUGUST 18, 1987 $ 21,666.46 (F.R. = $30,999.76) 1 l� t 87 -37 REV1SaD // .466i MEMO TO: THOMAS L. HEDGES, CITY ADMINISTRATOR FROM: THOMAS A. COLBERT, DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS DATE: SEPTEMBER 16, 1988 SUBJECT: PROJECT 506, PARK CLIFF 2ND ADDITION (STORM SEWER) COST PARTICIPATION On August 18, 1987, the City Council formally approved a project to install additional storm sewer facilities within the Park Cliff 2nd Addition in accordance with Alternate #4 described in the related feasibility reports and subsequent addendums. Prior to that public hearing, there were several neighborhood meetings and discussion at Council meetings pertaining to the necessity and extent of storm sewer improvements required. As you may recall, the property owners were quite adament that additional storm sewer facilities needed to be installed and should have been installed as a part of the original development improvement. The Developer, Dick Winkler (Park Cliff Development Company) contended that the storm sewer facilities that existed were "approved by the City" and that he felt no further obligation for additional storm sewer facilities subsequently requested by the current property owners. When approached with the concept that the City would finance one -third of the cost with the Developer and the homeowners sharing in the remaining two - thirds cost, Mr. Winkler indicated that he felt he would be participating equitably through the special assessment against 7 lots still under his ownership in an equitable manner similar to the current property owners. The public hearin was closed as indicated by the minutes enclosed on pager i,,Sand the project was ordered installed with the staff to negotiate additional contribution from Mr. Winkler to further reduce the property owner's obligations. Several meetings were held with Mr. Winkler and his engineer in both the detailed design review of the proposed improvements and additional financing contributions. Through these discussions, Mr. Winkler continued to contend that he felt no further obligation beyond his proportionate share reflected by his current ownership of several remaining lots within the assessment area. However, an offer was made to the City whereby he would personally finance an additional one -third of the cost if the City would release all current letters of credit that were being held on this subdivision as well as the Oak Cliff development along Slaters Road. This offer was rejected by staff as there are additional storm sewer problems within the Oak Cliff development that will have to be addressed separately at a later date. Staff felt it was not appropriate to release Mr. Winkler's involvement and financial securities for both the Park Cliff and Oak Cliff developments until all storm sewer problems have been satisfactorily resolved. Subsequent to these discussions and negotiations, pr, Winkler has submitted the written objection enclosed on page L for those lots still under his ownershi9,Kithin the Park Cliff development. oZ Also enclosed on page (1, a written objection from another property owner pertaining to the proposed two - thirds of the cost of the storm sewer system being financed by the property owners. Based on past discussions and current objections, to pursue additional participation from the developer through legal recourses will result in substantial cost to the City through legal and consulting engineering fees with past court precedences minimizing the potential of success for the City in pursuing this matter further. I will be available to help the City Council in determining the appropriate final assessment roll to be adopted taking into consideration the economic interests of both the citizens and the City. Tho as A. Colbert, P.E. Director of Public Works TAC /jf L.V Ul1G 11 l'l 1llU LCb August 18, 1987 00 352 PARK CLIFF 2ND ADDITION - STORM SEWER - PROJECT #506 Mayor Blomquist convened the public hearing regarding storm extensions under Project #506 in Park Cliff 2nd Addition. The public hearing had been continued from the July 21, 1987 meeting to allow the staff members to pursue various alternates with the property owners. A neighborhood meeting was held on Tuesday, August 11, 1987 and cost estimates for the assessment rates were discussed and reviewed in detail. Tom Colbert reviewed four alternates, including the fourth alternate which had a total estimated cost of $31,000.00 and cost per square foot of $0.075 for a total lot cost of $673.91. The fourth alternate would incorporate the storm sewer extension discussed in Alternate No. 1, but would increase the inlet capacity at the low point on Parkridge Drive and increase the storm sewer system to its outlet with the internal ponding area. Mr. Colbert stated that the objective would be to meet the City's five - year storm requirement with pond design for 100 year storm and inlet at 10 year design. He noted that the existing pipe size appears to be adequate but the number and size of the catch basins are not adequate, according to present day standards. Paul Hauge, the City Attorney, was asked to outline views regarding the obligation of the City, the developer, and the homeowners concerning the cost of necessary improvements. He stated that generally a city is not a guarantor, that the improvements will not be defective and that inspections by the City will not guarantee that there will be no defects. The City requires development agreements and safeguards to require completion. According to engineering standards and based upon the information received from the Public Works Department, it does not appear that the City would be responsibile, noting that the plans for the project initially prepared by the developer's engineer were not adequate accord to the Public Works Director. There was considerable discussion concerning the possibility of contribution by the developer. Al Mannino, 4689 Parkridge Drive, appeared on behalf of 25 homeowners, objecting to the homeowners being required to contribute to the project. He agreed that poor planning had taken place and asked for recommendation concerning the alternates from the City. Mr. Colbert recommended Alternate No. 4 but also recommended lowering of the pond under Alternate No. 3. Mr. Mannino indicated that the neighboring owners favor eliminating the -erosion -difficulties, that they want the flooding problem on Parkridge Drive attended to, and will bear a proportionate share based only on what the homeowners would have paid if there had been proper engineering and construction work accomplished initially. The level of the pond was indicated in the plans to be one and one- half feet lower than the existing pond - level. The consensus generally was that the affected property owners be assessed equally, according to Mr." Mannino. Another owner stated that he understood that Alternate No. 3 was not necessary because he had a great deal of run -off at the present time and he should not be required to pay any further costs towards storm sewer improvements. Another owner recommended the developer should bear all the costs and stated that would be no value added to his lot. Councilman Smith proposed assessing two - thirds of the actual cost to the property owners with the City contributing Council Minutes August 18, 1987 00353 one -third of the cost and that the City then request the developer to contribute up to two - thirds, which would reduce the homeowner's share proportionately. He further recommended the assessments be levied on a per -lot basis. Mr. Mannino requested the City approach the developer and Mayor Blomquist noted the importance of proceeding ahead because of the erosion problems. Mr. Mannino stated that on behalf of the homeowners, they would agree to the City proceeding with the preparation of plans for Alternate No. 4. It was further noted that the location of the catch basin may be in the wrong place and that the water does not flow into the catch basin. After extended discussion, Wachter moved, Egan seconded the motion to close the public hearing, to approve Alternate No. 4 and to authorize the preparation of plans and specifications with the understanding that the City will pay one -third of the cost of the improvements, that the homeowners will pay two - thirds of the costs and that the Cit staff will •roceed to negotiate with the developer to contribute up to two - thirds of the total cost with any contribution from the developer to reduce the homeowner's share proportionately; further, that the assessments be levied on a per - lot basis. All councilmembers voted yes. Winkler Development Co. W Winkler Development Co. 7300 WEST 147TH STREET. SUITE 403. APPLE VALLEY. MN 55124 1612) 432 -7101 City of Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55122 Dear Sir: A fr September 14, 1988 I am making a written objection to the proposed assessments against my lots listed below. Lot 11, Block 3 Lot 1, Block 4 Lot 7, Block 1 Lot 3, Block 2 Lot 4, Block 2 Lot 5, Block 2 Lot 6, Block 2 The utility work done does not benefit my lots and never needed to be done in the first place. The only benefited lots were lots 1 & 2, Block 2 - 2nd Addition, and they caused the problem by covering up the storm outlet when they built their homes. Sincerely, ParkCliff Development Co. - 2nd Addition, ParkCliff - 2nd Addition, ParkCliff - 3rd Addition, ParkCliff - 3rd Addition, ParkCliff - 3rd Addition, ParkCliff - 3rd Addition, ParkCliff - 3rd Addition, ParkCliff September 6, 1988 E.J. VanOverbeke City Clerk City of Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55122 Dear City Clerk: This letter is in response to the notice of special assessment to (Project # 10P506) to be considered by the City Counsel on September 19, 1988. We object to the total amount of the proprosed assessment allocated to the 46 lots. Our understanding of the agreement the ParkCliff residents reached with the City Counsel was that construction costs were to be shared 1/3 by the residents, 1/3 by the developer, Tom Winkler and 1/3 by the City of Eagan. This agreement was reached prior to any construction being started. Since this assessment is solely related to fixing improper initial construction by Winkler which was approved by the City's engineer, we feel our sharing of no more than one -third of the total cost is reasonable and more than fair. Therefore, we believe it is appropriate to reissue the notice of special assessment related to this project showing a total cost of $10,833.33 or $235.51 per lot. This would avoid a great deal of anger and frustration which has been rekindled within our neighborhood over this notice. We thought this unfortunate matter was behind us. Please keep it that way by honoring our previous agreement, therefore reducing the assessment to $10,833.33. Sincerely, /47 j <,// Vicki and Buzz Benson 4663 Parkridge Drive Eagan, MN 55123 454 -5169 Agenda Information Memo September 19, 1988, City Council Meeting DELINQUENT WEED CUTTING BILIS P. Final Assessment Hearing, Delinquent Weed Cutting Bills - -On August 16, 1988, a public hearing was scheduled for September 19, 1988, to receive input from affected property owners regarding the assessment of delinquent weed cutting bills. The assessment roll consists of the following parcels: 10- 17406- 100 -01 $136.00 10- 16602- 050 -01 The assessments are being spread for one (1) year at 9% interest. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To close the public hearing and approve the final assessment roll for delinquent weed cutting bills and authorize the certification to the County for collection. 96.00 $232.00 Agenda Information Memo September 19, 1988, City Council Meeting DELINOUENT UTILITY BILLS Q. Final Assessment Hearing, Delinquent Utility Bills - -On August 16, 1988, a public hearing was scheduled for September 19, 1988, to receive input from affected property owners regarding the assessment of delinquent sewer and water bills. The assessment roll consists of the parcels listed on pages O through The assessments are being spread for one (1) year at 9% interest. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To close the public hearing and approve the final assessment roll for delinquent utility bills and authorize the certification to the County for collection. PLAT /PARCEL AMOUNT PLAT /PARCEL AMOUNT 10 84600 170 01 33.00 10 39800 150 02 240.31 10 17400 170 00 10 17402 130 04 10 17402 110 04 104.87 43.18 88.37 95.15 183.52 10 17402 102 04 271.88 10 17402 101 04 140.32 10 17402 092 04 140.32 10 17402 091 04 140.32 10 17402 040 04 185.44 156.41 341.85 10 17402 031 04 199.94 10 17402 032 04 142.01 10 17402 012 05 172.94 10 17402 011 05 154.72 10 17402 042 05 10 17402 041 05 10 17402 051 O5 10 17402 052 05 10 17403 010 01 140.32 140.32 10 17403 040 01 187.89 162.03 142.86 172.28 147.26 140.32 280.64 349.92 SEWER AND WATER DELINQUENT ACCOUNTS 10 17403 051 01 10 17403 052 01 10 17403 071 01 10 17404 010 01 10 17404 041 01 10 17404 052 01 10 17404 051 01 10 17404 061 01 10 17404 062 01 10 17404 081 01 10 17404 082 01 10 63981 020 02 10 39802 020 04 10 73002 020 07 10 76503 030 07 10 14993 280 01 10 14993 440 01 10 44651 130 01 10 44651 120 01 10 16703 190 08 10 84354 110 03 10 17104 010 02 10 17151 110 03 10 45070 160 03 10 16601 032 01 10 16601 031 01 10 16602 050 01 10 17400 173 00 10 17400 171 00 192.97 180.84 89.22 49.10 100.60 85.35 138.09 149.19 136.49 177.96 136.49 228.80 252.52 59.80 104.83 188.29 42.57 67.09 40.26 73.96 38.52 46.89 114.48 10.28 70.22 65.32 395.72 83.46 80.84 RLAT /PARCEL AMOUNT PLAT /PARCEL AMOUNT 10 17400 170 00 10 17402 062 03 10 17402 030 02 10 63981 020 10 10 63983 030 12 10 63984 020 08 10 56750 040. 02 10 22750 380 03 10 25600 050 03 10 01900 020 10 10 77100 040 16 10 77100 010 16 10 73003 040 07 10 84460 180 03 10 14991 120 01 10 20960 210 04 37.34 22.50 97.19 110.41 16.56 84.42 40.81 30.21 79.94 64.01 85.62 30.00 56.17 118.05 248.94 71.24 TOTAL 8136.02 Agenda Information Memo September 19, 1988, City Council Meeting PROPOSED 1989 GENERAL FUND OPERATING BUDGET R. Consider Proposed 1989 General Fund Budget - -The City Council has held three (3) budget sessions to date, June 20, August 30 and September 13, to review the City Administrator's proposed 1989 general fund budget. The budget process began in late May when department heads were asked to compile their individual departmental budgets for calendar year 1989. The total departmental request for 1989 exceeded $13 million. The City Administrator reviewed the departmental requests and recommended an operating budget in excess of $11 million that included increased personnel, a capital equipment revolving fund, a contingency and new revenue sources. At the budget workshop meetings the City Council has reduced the proposed expenditures by eliminating approximately six positions, reducing the amount of contingency and separating the solid waste abatement grant from the operating budget. Revenues were adjusted to reflect a more conservative projection for 1989. The general fund budget under consideration by the City Council, is $10,495,780. The budget as proposed reflects a constant level of service for most of the departments. The excessive growth in terms of street miles, population and other factors that require additional personnel and equipment to maintain a constant delivery of service are considered in the proposed operating budget. As an example, the City Council is considering the hiring of five (5) new police officers during 1988, maintenance personnel for both Streets and Parks and Recreation, a full -time Fire Chief, and other personnel that are required for finance, community development including both building inspections and planning and parks and public works /engineering. The City Council reserves the right to further examine the budget and shift expenditure appropriations or revenue estimates as they see fit prior to its final adoption later this fall. The purpose of the public hearing is to allow any input from the public regarding the delivery of services within the community. The mill rate that is under consideration by the City Council and will be formally adopted at the October 4 City Council meeting is 19.258 mills. This mill rate represents a reduction of approximately .2 mills from the 1988 mill rate. A copy of the proposed 1989 budget handout will be proviepdto the general public is enclosed on pages through ] 5 The City Administrator will make a brief presentation and then expand to any level of discussion desired by either the audience or City Council. Agenda Information Memo September 19, 1988, City Council Meeting ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: There is no formal action, however, the City Administrator will present the 1989 budget as proposed and the City Council /City Administrator will entertain questions and input the general public might have regarding the proposed budget. SPECIAL NOTE: As stated, the tax levy will be certified by Council resolution at the October 4 meeting and the final general fund budget adopted in late November, early December. 13 DRAFT 1989 GENERAL FUND BUDGET CITY OF EAGAN -.., -- . r . ; , •J VL('LZ. Mt PUBLIC HEARING SEPTEMBER 19, 1988 § \ \ \ f § § § f \ f r $ \ \ 2 E / ) § / f \ § § § § / § \ ft: \ \ K • 2 / g \ G e g m 2 m g 2% - / § § f \ K r} 2 7 7 2 7 i k 7 K / K g ƒ \ § \ % \ \ f \ \ k $ � (.4 - § / -7 5 / § ƒ § £] § . / \ \ � }` /j ƒ § 0 f§ � § � � � § § § § d ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . • • gd O 14 vaAco M . Ul N m 0 N 6 giZA 9 A (.7 1 1 ) ) ) ) ) ) O1 0 gitj OQO r O E F O fi N a0 o oo ` m m M t N g o 0 Fa al ti 0 f- 0 0 0 0 O SR 1 1 IA II 1 11 11 I1 II n I 1 11 11 11 II ii S 11 I. rl N 1 • q:711 SR 11 N 8 II 11 031! it ii MI i{ it 1 1 KEi • 4. INTER GOV'TAL REV (19.32) PROGRAM REVENUES (7.6 %) 1988 GENERAL FUND SUMMARY OF REVENUES TRANSFERS (0.0%) MISC REVENUES (1 .930) CHGS FOR SERVICES (5.930) RECREATION CHGS (0.9% ) INTERGOV'TAL REV (15.5%) FINES /FORFEITS (1.73:) PERMITS (10.87.) LICENSES (0.7%) 1989 GENERAL FUND SUMMARY OF REVENUES TRANSFERS (0.53:) PROGRAM REVENUES (7.39.) MISC REVE NUE. QS( CHGS FOR SERVIC (1 ( RECREATION CHGS (0 .8 FINES /FORFEITS 4 LICENSES (0.730) TAXES (55.2 %) TAXES (54.3 %) CONTINGENCY (0.29) PUBLIC SAFETY (37.2%) 1988 GENERAL FUND SUMMARY OF EXPENDITURES PARKS & RECREATION (14.2%) .39) PUBLIC WORKS (18.69) GENERAL GOV'T (30 PUBLIC SAFETY (36.69) 1989 GENERAL FUND SUMMARY OF EXPENDITURES CONTINGENCY (0.69) 44 PARKS & RECREATION (13.8%) PUBLIC WORKS (19.09) GENERAL GOV'T (29.3%) Agenda Information Memo September 19, 1988, City Council Meeting OLD BUSINESS PROPOSED SOLDERHOLM ADDITION A. Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment, Solderholm Addition/ Eagle Enterprises, PD Amendment of 4.52 R -4 Acres Within the Lexington South Planned Development to an LB District and a Preliminary Plat Consisting of 3 Lots- -The Advisory Planning Commission first held a public hearing at their May 26 meeting and recommended approval of the Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment, rezoning and preliminary plat for the Solderholm Addition as originally proposed. This item was considered by the City Council at their June 21 meeting and due to concern over access at the county road intersection of Lexington and Diffley, the inconsistency with the Comprehensive Guide Plan and a desire to review the retail study results, the item was continued until the July 19 City Council meeting. At the consent of the developer, the item was continued to further dates to allow the Dakota County Plat Commission an opportunity to review the access locations being proposed for the Solderholm development. The Dakota County Plat Commission held a meeting on September 12 and for a copy of a revi d plan that wrs approved by the Commission, refer to pages 0 through t� Also enclosed on pages g c through O 4 is a copy of the original Planning and Engineering Department reports that were prepared for the May Advisory Planning Commission meeting. This document includes the minutes and recommendation of the Planning Commission. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny 1) a Comprehensive Guide Plan amendment, 2) planned development amendment of R -4 to LB and 3) a preliminary plat containing three lots entitled Solderholm Addition. 'I. 9 MEMO TO: DALE RUNKLE, CITY PLANNER FROM: JIM STURM, PLANNER 1 /LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT DATE: SEPTEMBER 15, 1988 RE: SODERHOLM ADDITION UPDATE At the request of the Dakota County Plat Commission, I attended their last meeting on September 12th in an effort to resolve the access locations being proposed for this five acre development. After approximately two hours of discussion, the revised plan was approved by the Commission with emphasis that it requires a Variance from County spacing guidelines. Short, Elliot Hendrickson support the revised plans and while their plan shows center medians, the County has not made their determination of whether or not they feel they are necessary. Attached is a detail of the revised plan and a letter to the Plat Commission regarding this issue. I will be at the September 19th City Council meeting to answer any further questions. JS /js Attach. OT 1 AY •111• CLINIC IOW* 1341 COVENANT CHURCH OF EAGAN OFFICE (low Ivo 11,000 40.1 — ^—r 1 0 ) 110.0 lilt 4WD 41' ME1' AO s. Arnim BANK 110' a 741 J ■ f uy a • 1.110001 H w 1 — N KENSINGTON PLACE 1st. ADDITION 3 • 0 0. 0. J 0 U W Z 0 = 0 r 0 01 0 X CC W 0. Z Z 0 N 0 0) O J K < < 0 W 0 W scan sas anss 0 i • •... • 10 Z U a s (00 ¢e 0- 0 u ma: 1 < ) n n .0 -• 03 4 ? OJ r• Z O J = Y W J¢ W 0� 0 J O CC J 4 � 0U0) CC < f ) ••• / LYwl LEXINGTON HILLS 1st. ADDITION \■ a 01 p 10 CI N 017 h 0rV 111 114 AO w to ••• -• • .••• •( . • z a W EPISCOPAL CHURCH .1as...,..•■• EAGAN CENTER 1st. ADDITION I 3830 PILOT KNOB ROAD. P.O. BOX 21199 EAGAN, MINNESOTA 55121 PHONE: (612) 454 -8100 city ®f ecgcin September 8, 1988 MR GARY STEVENSON & MEMBERS OF THE DAKOTA CTY PLAT COMMISSION APPLE VALLEY COMMONS BLDG STE 300 7300 W 147TH ST APPLE VALLEY, MN 55124 RE: SODERHOLM ADDITION Dear Gary: In early April 1988 the Soderholm plan, as proposed to the Plat Commission, was not approved due to the non - conformance with County spacing guidelines. As a result, this was one reason the Eagan City Council did not act on this applicaton. They directed staff to follow up on City related issues, as well as coordinate the access resolution with the County prior to rezoning and preliminary plat action. Since then, numerous meetings have taken place - most recently on August 10. The City's Consulting Traffic Engineering Firm, Short, Elliot & Hendrickson, modified the original plan slightly. This attached plan is acceptable to City staff. The entrance onto Lexington Avenue will line up with the church site to the east and continue along the northern lot line of the four lots connecting to Lexington Way. The large undeveloped R -4 (multiple) zoned property directly to the south is being studied by the City Parks Department for an active use /athletic facility containing five softball fields. If that land is acquired, the only access anticipated is onto Diffley Road, lining up with Lexington Way and onto Lexington Avenue, lining up with Patrick Road. S.E.H. is comfortable with the right in /right out near the center of the site, but not a full access. THE LONE OAK TREE.. THE SYMBOL OF STRENGTH AND GROWTH IN OUR COMMUNITY VIC ELLISON Mayor THOMAS EGAN DAVID K. GUSTAFSON PAMELA McCREA THEODORE WACHTER Council Members THOMAS HEDGES City Administrator EUGENE VAN OVERBEKE City Clerk Although this plan does not meet the strict interpretation of County spacing guidelines, it reflects the mutual cooperation of all concerned parties. As usual, the City will cooperate in every possible way with the County in an effort to provide the best overall development plans. If you would like me to attend the Plat Commission meeting or if I can be of further assistance please let me know. Sincerely, ,,,,....___ Jim Sturm Planner 1 /Landscape Architect JS /js Attach. CC: Dale Runkle, City Planner Tom Colbert, Director of Public Works Tom Hedges, City Administrator 1111111111111 elr." CITY OF EAGAN SUBJECT: COMPREHENSIVE GUIDE PLAN AMENDMENT, PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AMENDMENT, PRELIMINARY PLAT (SODERHOLM ADDITION) APPLICANT: EAGLE ENTERPRISES LOCATION: SW 1/4 OF SECTION 23 EXISTING ZONING: R -4 WITHIN LEXINGTON SOUTH PD DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: MAY 26, 1988 DATE OF REPORT: MAY 10, 1988 REPORTED BY: PLANNING AND ENGINEERING DEPARTMENTS APPLICATION SUMMARY: Separate-applications have been submitted requesting a Planned Development Amendment (Rezoning) of 4.52 R -4 (multiple) zoned acres within the Lexington South Planned Development to an LB (Limited Business) district and a Preliminary Plat consisting of three lots and an Outlot for future development. This site is located at the northwest intersection of Diffley Road and Lexington Avenue. Currently, a farmstead is located on the proposed Outlot at the western edge of the site. Parcel 1 and the remaining land in the triangular area to the north are currently zoned R -4. It is anticipated that the Covenant Church of Eagan will be requesting a Rezoning to a PF (Public Facilities) district in the near future. There has been talk that the Parcel 1 area may potentially develop as a multiple housing site for members of the congregation. The Northwestern Bell Utility Building, City well site and proposed twin 70' tall water towers abut proposed Lots 1 and 2. This site (Lots 1, 2, and 3) is flat and consists of open grassland. The existing farmstead contains some mature trees that may be saved when development occurs at a later date. It has access to both Diffley Road and Lexington Way at this time. SITE PLAN: Staff has been working with the developer the past several months regarding the possible Land Use change as well as with the County regarding potential access points onto Lexington Ave. and Diffley Road. Before any final site - related issues can be resolved, the issue of the zoning change had to be addressed. Then overall, as well as individual, lot plans could be reviewed by staff in a detailed manner. All proposed uses fit within the LB (Limited Business) district classification, the lowest on the commercial zoning scale. The three uses proposed are a child care facility, medical clinic, and bank on Lots 1 through 3 respectively. If the uses are approved, specific site plans will be submitted to the staff, Advisory Planning Commission, and City Council for final approval before building permits are issued. GRADING /DRAINAGE /EROSION CONTROL /UTILITIES: No preliminary grading, drainage, erosion control plan, site plan, or utility plan was submitted as a part of this application for staff review at this time. Water service of sufficient capacity and pressure, sanitary sewer service of sufficient depth and capacity, and storm sewer of sufficient depth and capacity are readily available to serve the proposed development in either Lexington Way, Diffley Road, or Lexington Avenue. STREETS /ACCESS /CIRCULATION: The development is proposing to take street access from Lexington Avenue on the east and Diffley Road on the south for proposed Lots 1,2, and 3. Future access to proposed Outlot A is to be taken from Lexington Way. At this point, the County has not approved either proposed access point location onto Diffley Road or Lexington Avenue. The Lexington Way connection to Lexington Avenue will be closed and a cul -de- sac constructed in the future. (See attached comments from Dakota County.) EASEMENTS /RIGHTS -OF- WAY /PERMITS: The development is proposing to dedicate the appropriate 60' half right -of -way for Lexington Avenue and Diffley Road. A 33' half right -of -way is proposed for Lexington Way. The development will be required to provide appropriate public utility easements for those public utilities which serve more than one platted parcel. All regulatory agency permits shall be required within the appropriate time frame as required by the affected agency. ASSESSMENTS: City records show the following pending assessments of record: PROJ # DESCRIPTION QUANTITY AMOUNT 478 Sanitary Sewer Lateral 577 ff $18,609.00 TOTAL PENDING ASSESSMENT $18,609.00 The following proposed assessments relate to upgrades from the change in use from the existing R -4 zoning (multiple family) to the proposed commercial use classification. The assessments are proposed in accordance with special assessment policies in effect at this time: PROJ # DESCRIPTION RATE Water Availability Charge 330 Storm Sewer Upgrade QUANTITY AMOUNT $2,015 /ac 3.26 $6,569.00 $ .013 /sf __._.127,120 1,653.00 9(0 330 Storm Sewer Upgrade .027 /sf 25,000 675.00 330 Storm Sewer (Additional Area) .056 /sf 36,589 2,049.00 299/304 Lateral Benefit Trunk Water Main 2.02 /ff 310 626.00 330 Lateral Benefit Trunk Storm Sewer 5.24/ff 260.6 1,366.00 395 • Lateral Benefit Trunk Water Main 8.50 /ff 260.6 2,215.00 330 Lexington Avenue 21.50 /ff 260.6 5,603.00 Future Diffley Road - 111.70 /ff 465 51,940.00 Future Trailway- Lexington Avenue 13.00 /ff 260.6 3,388.00 Future Trailway - Diffley Road 13.00 /ff 540 7,020.00 TOTAL PROPOSED ASSESSMENT $83,104.00 All final assessment obligations will be calculated based on the quantities and dimensions of the final plat and in accordance with the rates in affect at the time of the final plat approval. • SODERHOLM ADDITION CONDITIONS: 1.. These standard conditions of plat approval as adopted by Council action on September 15, 1987 shall be complied with: Al, B1, B2, B3, Cl, C2, C5, D1, El, F1, and G1. 2., Each lot shall be reviewed by both the Advisory Planning Commission and the City Council prior to the issuance of a building permit. 3. The existing access onto Diffley Road shall be removed at the time the first lot develops. 4. The development is required to provide sanitary sewer storm sewer and water service to all proposed platted lots. 5. Access locations to Lexington Avenue and Diffley Road, agreed upon by the County for all properties adjacent to the proposed development as well as the proposed development, are required prior to any development being allowed to continue. A. Assessments STANDARD CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL 1. This development shall accept its additional assessment obligations as defined in the staff's report in accordance with the final plat dimensions and the rates in effect at the time of final plat approval. B. Easements and Rights -of -Way 1. This development shall dedicate 10' drainage and utility easements centered over all common lot lines and adjacent to private property or public right -of -way. 2. This development shall dedicate, provide, or financially guarantee its proportionate share of the acquisition costs of additional drainage,- - ponding, and utility easements as required by the alignment, depth, and storage capacity of all required public utilities and streets located beyond the boundaries of this plat or outside of dedicated public right -of -way as necessary to service this development. 3. This development shall dedicate all public right -of -way and temporary slope easements for ultimate development of adjacent roadways as required by the appropriate jurisdictional agency. 4. This development shall dedicate adequate drainage and ponding easements to incorporate the required high water elevation necessitated by City storm water storage volume requirements. C. Plans and Specifications 1. All public streets and utilities necessary to provide service to this development shall be designed by a registered professional engineer in accordance with City codes and engineering standards and policies, and approved by staff prior to final plat approval. 2. A detailed grading, drainage, erosion, and sediment control plan must be prepared in accordance with current City standards and approved by staff prior to final plat approval. 3. This development shall insure that all temporary dead end public streets shall have a cul -de -sac constructed in .accordance with City engineering standards. 4. A detailed landscape plan shall be submitted on the proposed grading plan and approved by staff prior to the final plat approval. The financial guarantee shall be included in the Development Contract and not released until one year after the date of installation. s,c\ STANDARD CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL PAGE TWO 5. All internal public and private streets shall be constructed within the required right -of -way in accordance with City design standards. D. Public Improvements 1. If any public improvements are to be installed under a City contract, the appropriate project must be approved by Council action prior to final plat approval. E. Permits F. Parks Dedication 1. This development shall fulfull its parks dedication requirements as recommended by the Advisory Parks and Recreation Commission and approved by Council action. G. Other 1. All standard platting and zoning conditions shall be adhered to unless specifically granted a variance by Council action. Advisory Planning Commission City Council Approved: August 25, 1987 September 15, 1987 Revised: LTS t 2 STANDARD 1. This development shall be responsible for the acquisition of all regulatory agency permits in the time frame required by the affected agency. - r. ( ariur oa GOAT HILL PAR% WALNUT HILL PARK 11 I:r��'ft� :� ) 23 wRmviEw 'PARK -;," PATRICK EAGAN PARK PLACL 1. AO 1 VICINITY MAP 1 r. G� . 7 • is 1 LLI c • • 4. . ca GU- J a. J 3 i t • G 3 It b= EC •rr t o c) 1— - • 0 F- J O . 0 A {4 Sea x 1• . (D: 1 • NI • tu! ZONING / LAND USE INDEX PUBLIC FACILITIES/PARKS AGRICULTURAL • i k ia a ?�S a• ;z ;s COVENANT CHURCH OF EAGAN ._. • M • r --+ .1 o CEL 20 .PARCEL 3 W < = I i ii /a ��.' Op �: O p G W W 61) < R3 SS N aL 10 C7 z z O N KENSINGTON PLACE 1sL ADDITION ' He, •, I s •• � i •• •r rr. • •• r LEXINGTON HILLS 1st. ADDITION 1.. M.& ••• r'•• vr� •'wr r . -30 EPISCOPAL CHURCH EAGAN CENTER let. ADDITION ACCESS PARCEL 1 FUTURE 1 f•.rry. ; 1 pw�. . 1 \ ` r•.n � ,p. "..' if \ Ai l a 0 CEPS ACCESS 1 1 . i L & t J n• f. i Oz lSiml♦ l fillierwra g • 0 • I VI _r..• . .fir.. n11r..en u•tvr 7 1 � � I • ���� 1 v •r KENSINGTON PLACE 1si ADDITION 1. 1•r M •• LOT 1 tit +1•1• I ' — L -------.\-- • \ L — 1 ` •ir0�•r.r t ::-:.. s 1 1 � 1 ' 1 1 r• • i r•1••ft. r. I -I I N ( 1111111` C until CLINIC ••• • u•'0 ,1q417.011 WY - le. • t i•0 • r 1_,* /. r' 11 r• 0010 0 0 N 100•4 na1+ • • •x • t .•e_ O O x C i_• r O O O 0 . A._- O ... ♦ o _ n o o. � ■ Y2� ... J r 4 _ u ▪ p spa u c7 �0; z ° •1 auu a u�.4 ¢ 0 - 9 . ° . a uom N < s a LEXINGTON HILLS 13t. ADDITION >r6 IMP _..Y.•: •'.o 0 0 S EPISCOPAL CHURCH .A.I L - • . ---- , 11137 /10 Jr EAGAN CENTER 1sL ADDITION z 0 E a a 1- O 0 N CHURCH - -- ....7., -. . - ...- I /.:* M•1 L 1 FUTURE ; i b PARCEL 1 �� \ % ▪ � � .....,•......, •• • 1 ' t • � \ M+ / % • /a•np , y .•.. ••v • ` y . • 1 t I ... -� • ° 1 • N ` ,.t.:..•/ FRONTAGE ROAO •00a•• • o . -- "" -- DIFFL-EYLROAD rw ..w.. ' EXCEP I SA...:•••__ 1— Q KENSINGTON PLACE 18L ADDITION b O N ‘ 1, • • •• •/'7 C V° Y 0 tfE :1= CI: ••w w•• w ■•• sd• r a offal • /— I Y... 1•• • •• n CO h n h o n ++ N n n t :v .•w• r'• ye fn. • C S.A.H. U; a) co co cr CL CC D ELI _ Imo. ID w CD (.) cc 0 H CO EAGAN CENTER 1sL ADDITTJN • 1 r.. 1 s.uw 1 �....y. 1 .6, - ; WY__- 0 a> a la 64 KENSINGTON PLACE 1aLADDf11ON O —i i... w. 7 ..• O g 0 • 0 N 111 �! � 1 N a r•.• ... • u: cc LL w cn 6 cc co op U CV 1n N. Q 1 1 CO 0 Y Y N Z Z cc cc w 1— C'3 cc 1— cc 1— w 0 W } F_— J J • lL Q CO cri Z W < w .- Q CO < > ;= : r . •. „J < G :. d .'• w" - . - - Y,.• Q < < �C J .1,1 .A.H. -3 0-= EAGAN CENTER 1eL ADDITION Friti z 0 E 0 t` � � a w. .. = /wo:'4 W r.'•4• M laird KENSINGTON PLACE 1st. ADDITION 1 m Z 051 tE tj .'.•.— r•. •.• 0 ft el 4 I _ is 6 I: ✓.. V r•• • r. . • a. Fs; e I rI • � • .H_30= EAGAN CENTER let ADOJTON n 'Y MAP 17-11; ,r te •- , �f. 4 .H M PARCEL 1 PARCEL 2 r.. 1 I .... 1 r•....•• � t 1 rrnr FUTURE FRONTAGE ROAD EXCEP P. • i ^J.I M. — - - • • t . 0 0 Glair 11 KENSINGTON PLACE 1sLADDMON 0 O••••• 0 ac 12 I? s 11 ( 1 i g o I •••. r ✓••••• • • i• • •• 0 n n n n o n++ •• r• i !!ih ��t Z "Lc, .. • Ir Z r' roe ,.. .. s••• • -• 0 J J < . •LL! Q J : C_) CC < LL+ a • - C - S.A.H. 30- EAGAN CENTER 1st. ADDITION • z 0 E n p-. ^ U it d to .• .. "r.a LL Ln 0) m iA (i) co' � 0 ti WM ^ w N LL Q JJ - J Z Li.: O LL: CO N•• 0 T •M\ 0 co W,/) - ▪ O o y:Y:W.V 2cc i r•• 72. ••ti - L-1.•. • r• CO Q �1 UJ • ,Cr• • • • 1 ••.• '�in••••••^ y • C S.A.H. 30— W r.••••••• •••.h e.rrrr,. •�/ •••••• KENSINGTON PLACE Isl. AODITION /•/I. 4444 , EAGAN CENTER II 1st. ADDITION 8 • - • _ 0 - 854.0 '8 92.0 • ; • •■■■•■ P;.61- 8 96 864.0 ''•■■•• • 894.0 ■• ' 879.7 JP-62 893.0. . 895.5 , city of eagan PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT 'i,897.3 89.0. • 8 '680 JP-51 976.0 .980.0 it JP-46 • 892.3 89 3.5 12" 12" JP-63 899.7 ..:.( .• JP .11 I - 900.733 - z i : ' 887 Col 1-..._ 61615 .7 ' JP.:44-- I • ID 1; - 890.7 ,• (' 895.7 ',AI! -4 4 1 cq I E.t.,...: TT R(..•.E... " ,-- C. ---: 12 ' J-11)__ 27 _ _ __--4-t lo " ::i ,..... _L- .:-.--1 .. : 7: 1 vi JP-58Z -. 48 r,- .. .: _ ,..1.-. L.- - -, . 877.5 ■"1- i Y _..i.-4..rT•:■; 1 ,... 8822 . l• - _... . -",-... .,- -.../ or - JU ,-, ;(5- 8730 - . • : .4: : . 1 '..--.- :-::- -.• .■ . • • .. ...• -. 879.4 • . - • I .-.....-.--- i ' . ..--- •-:.------. SO i • • • - ' I . : • j . . 1- 1 . 1 ■7"-----'--,_, ,.. _ ____..:I3 1 --:„...„ - , _ NC Th ; ri -\ -e• I , \ i... 27' • ;J-dcf\ ,_ 1 ‘-`2. ,L ' • \ \ \ JP-29 926.0 945.0 • 12 JP 88 8 JP-4I rt. 88S 6 1 10 -5 JP -3 I 876.3 880.4 JP-34 ■ J-s 884.0 89/.9 JP-20 852.0 855.6 L.S. -15 It JP-39._ 8840 4 895.0 F11 J-r r \--l 832.0 JP-I9 30 874.0 882.0 )21 5: - r• SUBJECT PARCEL .:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:•••••••• .„.„.,....„ STORM SEWER MASTER PLAN 1 .e . 77 r. JP-12 826.0 853.0. • ! • • • • - • - -1-1) • / 4 J-o JP-21 815.3 840.0 az/ L.S.-17 J -vs JP- 53 864.0 880.4 \ \1- • JP-27 1 896.0 i 904.0 0/.7./ , 1 JP_ 82( 84 t • 1. approved: F standard plate if 1•■ AMR ••■ 0' 50.3/67.0 ORO OM OM — 41Mlb 12" .1116" 82.0 12" 15.5/50.0 city of eagan PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMEN 1 81 ems 50.4/67.0 , I WESCOTT. 54.6/71.0 I16" i CTIT)3 53.1/68.0 . 6..M.G. GROUND STORAGE 5000 G.P.M. BOOSTER H.W.L 1059 cc 24" 6,, 20" /- - 7'14 D 7 t I AMINO INEIDowm urn Amu, iff* 50.3/67.0 16" en■li =MI ONO a _11.1..11011O - OROIR_IBOIO:O=N_ONNIP % >11•RRI7 r—' Qt_30 tal 74.4/ 82.0 F1G#3 T WATER MASTER PLAN approved: standard plate if: ci L-'i ii \u 1/ u U (.J 1 V 1 SURVEY DEPARTMENT 7300 WEST 147th STREET. SUITE #300 City of Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55122 Att: Dale Runkle, City Planner RE: SODERHOLM ADDITION Dear Mr. Runkle: AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER April 8, 1988 CiAHY H. STEVENSON. R.L.S. COUNTY SURVEYOR (612) 431 -1153 APPLE VALLEY. MINNESOTA 55124 The Dakota County Plat Commission met-- on April 7, 1988, to consider the preliminary plat of SODERHOLM ADDITION. Said plat is adjacent to C.S.A.H. NO. 30 & CO. RD. 43 and is, therefore, subject to the Dakota County Contiguous Plat Ordinance. This proposal consists of 4 lots for a commercial development. County guidelines for right of way calls for both C.S.A.H. No. 30 and Co. Rd. 43 to be 60 feet from centerline. County spacing guidelines call for 1/4 mile spacing of access points. This proposed development does not meet the spacing guidelines. Distance along C.S.A.H. 30 between the centerlines of existing Lexington Way and CO. RD. 43 is less than 800 feet. This distance is less than the standard length required to develop two left turn lanes in the future. Therefore any access to C.S.A.H. NO. 30 would greatly limit the ability to develop future left turn lanes at Co. Rd. 43 and Lexington Way. The proposed site plan as submitted is not acceptable to the County. The Plat Commission recommends to the City that the entire area bounded by Co. Rd. 43, C.S.A.H. No. 30 and Lexington Way be analyzed for internal street possibilities. The County would consider for review any alternate plans. The preliminary plat should be -- required to show existing driveways and streets on both sides of C.S.A.H. .30 and CO. RD. 43. Mr. Ray Connelly stated at the meeting that the City had an access proposed to a park on the south side of C.S.A.H. 30. This plan should be submitted to the County Plat Commission for review. County staff would be available to meet with you to discuss the development of this area as it concerns the County roads if you desire. No work shall commence in the County right of way until a permit is obtained from the County Highway Department. Sincerely yours, • /4-‘vpd Gary H. Stevenson Dakota County Surveyor Plat Commission Secretary CC: D. R. Griswold & Associates Dave Everds, County Highway Engineer Tom Swanson, Permits Technician Tom Colbert,- Public Works Director Gary Erickson, Physical Development Director GHS : of TO: TOM HEDGES, CITY ADMINISTRATOR FROM: KEN VRAA, DIRECTOR OF PARKS AND RECREATION DATE: JUNE 17, 1988 RE: SOLDERHOLM ADDITION - EAGLE ENTERPRISES KV:cm MEMORANDUM cc: Marilyn Wucherpfennig, Planning Aide Ed Kirscht, Engineering Technician • • \th The Advisory Parks and Recreation Commission at it's June 2, 1988 meeting reviewed the proposed Solderholm Addition. After review, the Commission made the following recommendation: 1. That this plat be subject to a cash parkland dedication and a five foot concrete sidewalk be placed along the north side of Diffley Road. 4 Chairman Pawlenty stated he has concerns with the General Business designation and also with the access off of Pilot Knob Road. Graves stated he has concerns with the General Business use designation being situated between two single - family subdivisions. Miller expressed reservations with the General Business designation and questioned what would happen if Mr. Horne died. He stated that someone could then come in with a two -story bowling alley if the General Business designation was approved. Voracek stated he has concerns regarding Outlot C and suggested possible compromises, for example, a stipulation inserted regarding limited use. Mr. Voracek also proposed a condition regarding the townhomes and stated that if property to the north becomes single - family dwelling, these proposed townhomes would then become single - family dwellings also. Wilkins suggested continuing the item to the June 21st, 1988 Planning Commission meeting. Chairman Pawlenty asked for Mr. Horne's response regarding the continuance. Mr. Horne stated he would be very reluctant to change his plan. Graves moved, Wilkins seconded, the motion to deny the application for the Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment, a Rezoning and a Preliminary Plat of 52.8 agricultural acres to a mixed used Planned Development District consisting of 41.5 single - family acres and two outlots for future development with General Business and Townhouse designations located between Pilot Knob Road and Highway 35E north of Deerwood Drive in the Northeast Quarter of Section 21. All voted in favor. SOLDERHOLM ADDITION - EAGLE ENTERPRISES The next public hearing of the evening convened by Chairman Pawlenty was in regard•to the application of a Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment (Rezoning) of 4.52 R-4 (multiple) acres within the Lexington South Planned Development to a LB (limited business) district and a Preliminary Plat containing three lots located at the Northwest intersection of Lexington Avenue and Diffley Road in the Southwest Quarter of Section 23. w ' Denny Griswold, landscape architect, presented the proposed development to the Commission. He stated that City staff has been working with him the .past several months regarding the possible land use change as well as with the County regarding the potential access points on to Lexington Avenue and Diffley Road. Before any final site related issues can be resolved, the issue of the zoning change must be addressed. Jim Haglund, representative of the church land north of the Towers, stated he is concerned about the access. When Lexington Hills was approved, he stated the access question was a hot item. They do not want an opening from Lexington Hills on to their property. They consider it their place of access. Brad Swenson, Tri -Land Properties, stated he will be submitting a proposal for a medical building and a bank. He is concerned with fragmentation if there is development across the road from his property. Don Warkentine stated he is very concerned with the quality of construction in the area. Joe Grisnick stated he lives across from the potential development. He voiced his support for the good that Solderholm has done for the community. Trygg questioned if there would be definite users for the proposal. Griswold stated there will be definite Voracek expressed a concern regarding the gas station. The gas station use has been ruled out. Graves stated he has concerns with the access and the increase in the activity in the intersections. Wilkins questioned too much limited business zoning and the necessity for it. Merkley questioned if it was better to have limited business districts over multiple zoning districts. Voracek questioned if this rezoning was the answer to the problem, particularly for the use of this parcel. He is not quite sure what to do with this parcel. He is of the opinion that this parcel must have some type of access off of Lexington Way and that access is not being proposed. Del Einess, developer, proposed access changes. Chairman Pawlenty was hesitant regarding the access land use and stated he felt that was not the problem but that the access itself was the problem. ,Miller questioned whether they may be creating a use by changing it to limited business from a multiple zoning because it may be unworkable in a multiple zoning. Voracek moved, Merkley seconded, the motion to approve the Planned Development Amendment regarding Solderholm Addition. Miller, Pawlenty, Voracek, Merkley, and Graves voted in favor; Wilkins and Trygg voted against. Voracek moved, Merkley seconded, the motion to approve the Rezoning of 4.52 R-4 (multiple) acres within the Lexington South Planned Development to a LB (limited business) district. Miller, Pawlenty, Voracek, Merkley and Graves voted in favor; Wilkins and Trygg voted against. Voracek moved, Merkley seconded, the motion to approve the application for a Preliminary Plat containing 3 lots, . located at the Northwest intersection of Lexington Avenue and Diffley Road in the Southwest Quarter of Section 23, subject to the following conditions: -4- 1. These standard conditions of plat approval as adopted by Council action on September 15, 1987 shall be complied with: Al, Bl, B2, B3, Cl, C2, C5, D1, El, F1, and Gl. 2. Each lot shall be reviewed by both the Advisory Planning Commission and the City Council prior to the issuance of a building permit. • 3. The existing access onto Diffley Road shall be removed at the time the first lot develops. 4. The development is required to provide sanitary sewer, storm sewer and water service to all proposed platted lots. 5. Access locations to Lexington Avenue and Diffley Road, agreed upon by the County for all properties adjacent to the proposed development as well as the proposed development, are required prior to any development being allowed to continue. Miller, Pawlenty, Voracek, Merkley and Graves voted in favor; Wilkins and Trygg voted against. GALAXIE CLIFF PLAZA - CLIFF PLAZA PARTNERSHIP • The next public hearing convened by Mr. Pawlenty was in regard to the application of Cliff Plaza Partnership regarding the Rezoning and Preliminary Plat of 25.36 agricultural acres to a Planned Development District consisting of one lot for an office building with the remaining area for future development :Located south of Cliff Road, west of Galaxie Avenue and east of 35E in the Northwest Quarter of Section 32. Chairman Pawlenty stated the Commission would be discussing the matter in general terms only. In particular, the Waiver of Plat. Sturm updated the Commission on the background material concerning the project. He stated the community /neighborhood sentiment is to not change the present land use plan /zoning. Tom Klein, 4580 Blackhawk Road, voiced his concern that the value of his property will be impacted by the development of the north 2.5 acres. He stated it is okay to use the limited business as a "buffer" between the residential and commercial and that a roadside business designation contravenes this goal. He endorsed limited business zoning throughout. Victor Twadell stated he is concerned about fragmentation and wants a complete plan in the vicinity conducive to the neighborhood unity. Kim Johnson, 1834 Karis Way, is opposed to adding the RB zoning and is also opposed to the plat. Her main concern was the traffic increase in the area to Cliff Road. She stated she felt Cliff Road would become another County Road 42. She does not feel the proposal is in the best interest of the residents or the City. -5- Agenda Information Memo September 19, 1988, City Council Meeting REZONING /SUNCREST ADDITION B. Rezoning, Suncrest Addition /William Huttner of A to R -1 District and a Preliminary Plat Consisting of 16 Lots - -A public hearing was held by the Advisory Planning Commission at a regular meeting held on July 26, 1988 to consider a rezoning and preliminary plat entitled the Suncrest Addition as requested by William Huttner. The APC is recommending approval. At the August 16, 1988 City Council meeting, these applications were considered and referred back to the City staff and developer to consider alternatives for the elimination of the stove pipe lots. The developer and staff have examined alternatives and, for a copy of t e Planning Department report, refer to pages O ` ( through ( For a copy of the Planning and Engineering Department report which includes the minutes from th A visory Plar}nin Commission meeting of July 26, refer to pages through The Advisory Parks and Recreation Commission is recommending a cash dedication. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny a preliminary plat entitled Suncrest Addition as presented. MEMO TO: DALE C. RUNKLE, CITY PLANNER FROM: JIM STURM, PLANNER 1 /LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT DATE: SEPTEMBER 15, 1988 RE: SUNCREST ADDITION At the August 16, 1988 City Council meeting, this item was continued with direction to staff to review the four stovepipe shaped lots of this 14 lot subdivision in greater detail. I met with Tri -Land staff and asked them to prepare two alternative plans: 1) with a shorter cul -de -sac that still required nine stovepipe lots, but had shorter driveways and 2) one that extended the cul -de -sac to the east with all lots meeting R -1 code requirements. With all three plans, Tri -Land was asked to show existing tree locations in the driveway area, as well as the massing that exists in the area. If the original plan or Alternative One is approved, more trees may be saved if careful driveway and individual house pad grading occurs. Alternative Two (meeting all Code requirements) adds three lots and destroys the majority of the tree stand. The Public Works Department is concerned with having four driveways at the end of a cul -de -sac and where snow storage would occur. If either of the stovepipe proposals is approved, shared driveways or minimum separating between them should be added as conditions to the plat. Attached is the original plan and the two alternative plans with the tree massing outlined. JS /js Attach. Lorra c 0 -5; - ,$)Ii/ft; 11 \� ���C ( it /�/ lj pct--r 1 97 1 329 v///0/ //t/41)) • k,'2)))) APPLICATION SUMMARY CITY OF EAGAN SUBJECT: REZONING, PRELIMINARY PLAT, VARIANCE SUNCREST ADDITION APPLICANT: WILLIAM HUTTNER LOCATION: SE 1/4 OF SECTION 14 EXISTING ZONING: A (AGRICULTURAL) DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: JULY 26, 1988 DATE OF REPORT: JULY 18, 1988 REPORTED BY: PLANNING AND ENGINEERING DEPARTMENTS Separate applications have been submitted requesting a Rezoning of 10.53 A (agricultural) acres to an R -1 (single - family) district and a Preliminary Plat consisting of sixteen lots located northwest of the Sunrise Hills and Woodlands Additions and south of the Wescott Garden Lots. This proposal is in conformance with the City's most recent Land Use Plan. SITE PLAN /EXISTING CONDITIONS The 100' -wide Williams Brothers pipeline easement bisects this site in the southeast corner creating an outlot that will be attached to The Woodlands 2nd Addition. The plat calls for a road extension from Wescott Hills Drive to the platted Birch Street right -of -way. It is anticipated that this road will continue to the northeast and then loop southward connecting to Woodland Trail. Lot 5, block 1 and lots 9, 10, and 11, block 2 will be final platted as outlots since no immediate access is being provided to them. A stand of mature oaks is in the south central portion of the site where the stovepipe lots are being requested. If careful lot grading and driveway grading are followed, along with some retaining walls, it may be possible to save some of these trees. Code requires a 50' minimum width at the street right -of -way line. These stovepipe lots are 30' wide at that point. All other lots are at least 90' wide at the typical 30' setback line. They vary in size from 14,150 sq ft. to 60,000 sq. ft.; most have walkout capability. These custom built homes would be built exclusively by William Huttner. GRADING /DRAINAGE /EROSION CONTROL: The preliminary grading plan submitted as a part of this application proposes cut and fill areas ranging from 18' +/- in the area of the proposed flag lots connection to Sunwood Trail and 10' +/- along the westerly edge of proposed Sunwood Trail, respectively. The Development is proposing a 4' high retaining wall in the backyard areas of Lots 7,. 8 and 9 of Block 2 and along the common lot line between Lots 6 and 5, Block 2. The Development will be required to submit detailed plans and specifications for the proposed retaining walls for staff review and approval. In the proposed house pad areas for Lots 3 through 6, Block 2, the Development is proposing to leave the grading for the house pads on those Lots up to the discretion of the home builder. The Development is proposing to convey the site generated storm water runoff into Pond JP -60. Pond JP -60 is a designated ponding area on the City's Comprehensive Storm Sewer Plan. The outlet for Pond JP -60 into Pond JP -41 was constructed in conjunction with the development of the Sunrise Hills Addition. The Development will be required to extend a storm sewer outlet to the northerly boundary of the plat. This northerly storm sewer extension should be designed to handle approximately 8 cfs of storm water runoff. The Development will be required to supply staff with proposed walkout elevations for the house pads in the area of Pond JP -60. At this time there is no way of knowing if the proposed house pad elevation encroaches below the high water level of the pond. There are two landlocked low areas created with this Development. D.:e to the fact that the only runoff being conveyed to these landlocked low areas is back yard runoff from the proposed house pads, the runoff into them will be minimal and outlets will not be required. These two landlocked low areas are located in the backyards of Lots 1, 2 and 3 and Lots 5, 6, 8 and 10, all in Block 2. No erosion and sediment control plan was submitted for staff review as a part of this preliminary plat application. The following items are required to be addressed in an erosion and sediment control plan prior to any grading permits being issued or final plat approval: 1. Lot Benching. 2. Specifications for seeding and mulching the site should be included in the proposed plan. All disturbed areas are required to be seeded and mulched within 48 hours after rough grading. 3. The site map should identify an ingress and egress point for the site. A rock construction entrance pad will be necessary at ingress and egress points to minimize tracking of mud by vehicles onto paved surfaces. \.5" 4. The silt curtain must be properly installed before any land disturbances occur. A detailed drawing for the installation of the silt curtain should also be included on the plan. 5. The revegetation of all areas disturbed by utility construction must be addressed in the proposed plan. 6. Maintenance of erosion and sediment control measures during and after rough grading should be included in the proposed plan. 7. The company responsible for maintaining and removing all erosion and sediment control practices should be identified. 8. A storm sewer inlet filter is required around all catch basins to prevent sediment movement into pond areas. 9. All storm sewer outletting into water bodies should be adequately protected to prevent scouring from occurring at the outlet. 10. Identify on the plan where topsoil will be stockpiled. 11. All fill slopes are required to be 3:1 or less. 12. Include construction schedules for rough grading, installing utilities, revegetating the site, building construction, curb and gutter, and blacktopping. These schedules impact erosion and sediment control requirements. UTILITIES: Sanitary sewer service of sufficient depth and capacity is readily available to the site in Wescott Hills Drive. The existing sanitary sewer in Wescott Hills Drive was provided as a part of the Sunrise Hills Development. The Development will be required to extend sanitary sewer service to its northerly property line a low enough elevation to serve the northerly adjacent Wescott Garden Lots, if and when, that area ever develops. Water main service of sufficient pressure and capacity is readily available in Wescott Hills Drive. The water main service in Wescott Hilis Drive was provided with the development of the Sunrise Hills Addition. The Development will be required to provide a water main stub to the northerly adjacent property. STREETS /ACCESS /CIRCULATION: Street access to this site is readily available from the existing Wescott Hills Drive. The Development is proposed to be served by a 60' wide street connecting Wescott Hilis Drive with the northerly adjacent Birch Street. Birch Street is a platted right -of -way but unimproved at this time. The Development will required to construct a temporary cul -de -sac at the north end of the proposed Development. - EASEMENTS /RIGHTS -OF- WAY /PERMITS: The appropriate easements will be required on the sanitary sewer and water main service extended to serve Lots 3, 4, 5 and 6 of Block 2. The Development will be required to provide the appropriate ponding easement for Pond JP- 60 to incorporate the required high water level and storage volumes in accordance with the City of Eagan's Comprehensive Storm Sewer Plan. All regulatory agency permits shall be acquired within the appropriate time frame as required by the affected agency. ASSESSMENTS: The assessments which would normally be proposed as a condition of final plat approval are being collected /agreed upon by the execution of Waiver of Plat *14- W- 9 -5 -88. SUNCREST CONDITIONS: 1. These standard conditions of plat approval as adopted by Council action on September 15, 1987 shall be complied with: Bl, B2, B3, B4, Cl, C2, C3, C5, Dl, El, F1, and G1. 2. The developer shall note the proximity of the Williams Brothers pipeline easement in the purchase agreement for each lot abutting it. 3. A Variance for stovepipe lot widths shall be approved (lots 3, 4, 5, and 6, block 2). 4. Outlot A shall be included with The Woodlands 2nd Addition or the lot line between lots 4 and 5 shall be extended to the eastern property line. 5.. Lot 5, block 1, and lots 9, final platted as an outlot. 10, and 11, block 2 shall be 6.. Development is required to submit detail plans of the proposed retaining wall construction for staff review and approval prior to issuance of a grading permit and /or final plat approval. 7. Development is required to provide an 8 cfs storm sewer outlet to the northerly adjacent property. 8. Development is required to extend sanitary sewer service and water main service to the northerly adjacent property. A. Assessments STANDARD CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL 1. This development shall accept its additional assessment obligations as defined in the staff's report in accordance with the final plat dimensions and the rates in effect at the time of final plat approval. B. Easements and Rights -of -Way 1. This development shall dedicate 10' drainage and utility easements centered over all common lot lines and adjacent to private property or public right -of -way. 2. This development shall dedicate, provide, or financially guarantee its proportionate share of the acquisition costs of additional drainage, ponding, and utility easements as required by the alignment, depth, and storage capacity of all required public utilities and streets located beyond the boundaries of this plat or outside of dedicated public right -of -way as necessary to service this development. 3. This development shall dedicate all public right -of -way and temporary slope easements for ultimate development of adjacent roadways as required by the appropriate jurisdictional agency. 4. This development shall dedicate adequate drainage and ponding easements to incorporate the required high water elevation necessitated by City storm water storage volume requirements. C. Plans and Specifications 1. All public streets and utilities necessary to provide service to this development shall be designed by a registered professional engineer in accordance with City codes and engineering standards and policies, and approved by staff prior to final plat approval. 2. A detailed grading, drainage, erosion, and sediment control plan must be prepared in accordance with current City standards and approved by staff prior to final plat approval. 3. This development shall insure that all temporary dead end public streets shall have a cul -de -sac constructed in accordance with City engineering standards. 4. A detailed landscape plan shall be submitted on the proposed grading plan and approved by staff prior to the final plat approval. The financial guarantee shall be included in the Development Contract and not released until one year after the date of installation. STANDARD CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL PAGE TWO 5. All internal public and private streets shall be constructed within the required right -of -way in accordance with City design standards. D. Public Improvements 1 . I f any public improvements are to be installed under a City contract, the appropriate project must be approved by Council action prior to final plat approval. E. Permits 1. This development shall be responsible for the acquisition of all regulatory agency permits in the time frame required by the affected agency. F. Parks Dedication 1. This development shall fulfull its parks dedication requirements as recommended by the Advisory Parks and Recreation Commission and approved by Council action. G. Other 1. All standard platting and zoning conditions shall be adhered to unless specifically granted a variance by Council action. Advisory Planning Commission City Council Approved: August 25, 1987 September 15, 1987 Revised: LTS #2 STANDARD 1 O LD�A�vr -� ZDNi1-- - L-A 7 hAP ` 2� CIRRF401 i Y7� NIL[S COLE' aluE Cl - a! jj CUURSF _S r ( ? �l "T• SCUM SCu M' „lLS alb. i V h .\ �� ,, ll9 ran f " ,' �, �� '=x.. e ms ��,z _aa� - t ; :�/� s 2 a - ` 1 ( 1 . ..L i '. ! . 0,_____, • =u CE. •iuMN . ✓ ,ice \ . Tr"+ _0 __;■ K , suw�ww+�' : ..'r - •, --r tea . •• �" • �S c+s 'Y'%/// • (((\ \' � 1 \ \ \ - � �� 1 6 v]NIOJbeG /�\ 3 bG I 41,A\ \ \ 1,\,:‘\k\I l( V N� 4 • i ;�� !;.! I -- \l � \- \ \ \ \ , \ \ \mi l l 1\� +�I; I ( Er,� � l. -----r‘.1.- -- ! t.. \ \ aN\ , ,-- ,-,.,-. :::;_.......„ ,:,97,,z,.:\\„ \\ ---:-L,.i_-_!1. s,\\ s 1 \i,,,: 1 ,,i,,i iil t --'---: 2. ' ------ -- ----: ' ' f /.//// (II; ./1 \ \/ 1 \\ \ - 71;3. - ----1--! - -..- - '; .-7 I - A. t ' l '1 t". '' ' ' \ \\%\\'< o m — fi r . s. I.,\ \ :--- ) __..-- / 1 / /, -- "Y �J r N r tea' -� �/ / \ \ N /// \ / I F. f � /� N � - ��'. / 1�• / ' — <. / . � 17, /,./',// ) , i -- — � �j ', 4 ( 2 , - . l� / _-1' — ` 1 ? \ ,, / / ' / / / i' / �ii1 \ Ct3N100b9Z" ,M YS IZ.. (V \ \. e T .. . ( k / / , 1 /� L_^ (x3701 sao�y \ \ 1 1 f (( v ;\(i) ,liff z—,„.---,-;_:„ ),./1,_,--,,---- 1— z g ;ill L \\\\N"7-- ,—_....._.--_____ ___/--,/ / / / / \ > > - - - - - : - 7 71/(7, 7 7 .1 /i'' • ‘'s \ \\N --) (( ''. s '''‘` \\\\ °I / z / ,, / ----`'-'. .s Irt ..-. 7/ /��� \ � \, \ � \ \ = 1, / li /r/p / J it A \ \ \\ IN \\,\\ \, \ ,/ Ej , II j 1x7 -,-- . \� 1s \ \ _ t �` 1 � \ W , „. I� / f I // l/ %`� i� \o4 \ 'k\ \\\'`\:\\\''.\\'‘`\"\-\-N-"/ . \\*\\ " \ 4'f \\ \\ ; \ ' k\ '\\\ \ \ '' \\ . \\ \ \\\\\'':\\\\\\ \ \0\ \ \ \ c' \ \\\:j''''''N\ \. \t H 1\:\ k.,\X'\- )Jit,\'' ..:::,::::,-,,t • :,. 5100 1- - 1-0-DC 0 4 0 0 3 Page 18 /PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES July 26, 1988 Bob Engstrom, developer, asked the Commission to approve his request. Tnere were no public comments. Mr. Graves asked why the request for the customary notice regarding the Williams Pipeline easement. Mr. Voracek stated it had been the customary procedure because of the recent Williams explosion in St. Paul. Merkley moved, Garry seconded, the motion to close the public hearing and approve the preliminary plat of ;7oodlana 2nd Aadition consisting or 12 lots on 7.35 R -1 (single family) acres locatea north of Basswood Lane in the southeast quarter of Section 14, subject to the foilcwing conditions: 1. These standard conditions or plat approval as acoptea by Council action on September 15, 1987, shall be complied witn: A -1, B-1, C-1, C-2, C-3, C-5, D-1, E-1, F -1 and G-1. 2. Lots 7, 8, 9, 10, and 11 shall rote the proximity of the Williams Bros. Pipeline Easement in the purchase agreement. 3. The cul -de -sac variance, a lengtn in excess of 500 feet., shall be approved. The planting in the center island shall be reviewed by staff in conceptual form. 4. An emergency overland drainage 9 and 10. . 5. No storm sewer will be allowed low areas of the proposed development. All voted in favor. SDNCREST ADDITION - WILLIAM HDTTNER Chairman.Pawlenty opened the next public hearing in regard to the re- zoning of 10.53 agricultural acres to a single family district and a preliminary plat consisting of 16 lots located north of Sunwooa Trail and south of Birch Street in the southeast quarter of Section 14. Mr. Sturm informed the Commission that separate applications nad been received requesting a re- zoning of 10.53 agricultural acres to single family district and a preliminary plat consisting of 16 lots located northwest of the Sunrise Hills and Woodlands Adaitions and south of the Wescott Garden lots. He stated the 100' wide Williams Bros. Pipeline easement bi -sects the site in the southeast corner creating an outlet that will be attached to the Woodlands 2nd Addition. The plat calls for a road extension from Wescott Hills Drive to the platted Birch Street right -of -way. It is anticipated swale is required between Lots to discharge into the backyard Page 19 /PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES July 26, 1988 that the road will continue to the northeast and then loop soutnward connecting to Woodland Trail. Lot 5, Block 1 and Lots 9, 10, and 11, Block 2 would be final platted as outiots since no immediate access is being provided to them. A stand or mature oaks is in the south central portion of the site where the stovepipe lots were requested. Through careful lot gracing and driveway grading it may be possible to save some of the trees. Code requires a 50' minimum width at the street right -of -way line. The stovepipe lots are 30' wide at that point. All other lots are at least 90' wide at the typical 30' setback line. The custom built homes would be built exclusively by William Huttner. There are two lanalocked low areas created with the development. Due to the fact that the only runoff conveyea to these landlockea low areas is backyard runoff from the proposed house pads, the runoff into them will be minimal and outlets will not be reauired. The two landlocked low areas are located in the backyaras of Lots 1, 2 ana 3 and Lots 5, 6, 8, and 10, all in Block 2. The developer stated the unusual design of the addition was to save as many trees as possible. He askew the Commission to grant approval of his request. John Overson, stated he did not want additional assessment on the north property. He stated he did not want a road to run up to nis property as it would interfere with his farming. He urged the Commission to deny the request. Ed Devlin, 355 Trails End, stated he would like more information as to what type of development would be developed. Brad Swenson stated that the loss of the two lots would be costly to the developers. He stated Engstrom was a quality builder. He stated the area was adjacent to high quality homes. Mr. Devlin asked what type of assessments would be assessed against the adjoining property. Mike Foertsch stated there are no foreseen assessments at this time. Chairman Pawlenty asked if a common driveway could be used in regard to the stovepipe lots. Brad Swenson stated it would be a big problem for the builders. Member Wilkins asked if Huttner haa purchased the west property. She was informed he had not. Wilkins haa concerns regarding the outlot on the Woodlands Addition. Mr. Merkley questionea tne future development of the future road connection. Mr. Graves asked if the road could be prevented from extenaing to tne adjoining property. Mr. Sturm stated it is policy to require the full extension. Mr. Voracek asked if a barrier could be constructed. Mr. Sturm said there would be a problem witn the easement. \2_ (0. C Page 20 /PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES July 26, 1988 :1r. Graves asked for a report on the status or Wescott Hills Drive. Mr. Sturm stated it would be a future connection and no action was necessary at the present meeting. Trygg moved, Voracek seconded, the motion to close the public hearing and approve the re- zoning or 10.53 a (agricultural) acres to an R -1 (single family) district. All voted in favor. Trygg moved, Voracek seconded, the motion to approve the preliminary plat for Suncrest Addition consisting of 16 lots located north of Sunwood Trail and south of Birch Street in the southeast quarter of Section 14, subject to the following conditions: 1. These standard conditions of plat approval as adopted by Council action on September 15, 1987, shall be complied with: B -1, B -2, B -3, B -4, C -1, C -2, C -3, C -5, D -1, E -1, F -1, and G -1. 2. The developer shall note the proximity of the Williams Brothers pipeline easement in the purchase agreement for each lot abutting it. 3. A variance for stovepipe lot widths shall be approved (lots 3, 4, 5, and 6, Block 2) . 4. Outlot A shall be included with The Woodlands 2nd Addition or the lot line between lots 4 and 5 shall be extended to the eastern property lone. 5. Lot 5, block 1, and lots 9, 10, and 11, block 2 shall be final platted as an outlot. 6. Development is required to submit detail plans of the proposed retaining wall construction for staff review and approval prior to issuance of a grading permit and /or final plat approval. 7. Development is required to provide an 8 cfs storm sewer outlet to the northerly adjacent property. 8. Development is required to extend sanitary sewer service and water main service to the northerly adjacent property. Trygg stated that City staff should address the concerns of John Overson regarding the road interfering with his farming. All voted in favor. WESCOTT SQUARE ADDITION - NEW HORIZON HOMES Chairman Pawlenty opened the next public hearing in regards to the application for a preliminary plat of 9.83 R -3 (townhouse) zoned 1 �� Agenda Information Memo September 19, 1988, City Council Meeting NEW BUSINESS APPOINTMENTS /ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION AND ADVISORY PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION A. Appointments for the Economic Development Commission and the Advisory Parks and Recreation Commission- -The resignations of Tom Ellingson, a member of the Economic Development Commission and David Hennes, an alternate member of the Advisory. Parks and Recreation Commission, were recently accepted by the City Council. The City Administrator was authorized to advertise in the newspaper for the purpose of entertaining applications to fill these vacancies. For the Economic Development Commission, the City has received two (2) applications. They are Patrick Grinde, 3529 Widgeon Way ou h and Paul Kr uss, 4652 Parkridge Court. Enclosed on pages �. through Lj_> are copies of letters they submitted to the Cit . A ballot will be provided with the names of Mr. Grind and Mr. Krauss for your consideration. For the Advisory Parks and Recreation Commission, the City has received one (1) application from Theodore Billy who resides at 4338 Sequoia Drive. Please refer to page 3 for a copy of his letter. Again, a ballot will be printed zith Mr. Billy's name appearing. Each of the ballots will include a space to write in a candidate if the City Council so desires. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: 1) To appoint a resident to fill the unexpired term of Tom Ellingson who's term ends as a member of the Economic Development Commission in February, 1989, and 2) appoint a resident to fill the unexpired term of David Hennes as a member of the Advisory Parks and Recreation Commission who's term expires in January, 1989, as the alternate to the APRC. August 20, 1988 City Administrator 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55122 Dear Sir: In response to your article in the August 17th Eagan Chronicle, I am expressing my interest in appointment to the Economic Development Commission. My family and I have recently moved from the Front Range of Colorado, and prior to that we lived in Grand Forks, ND. After careful consideration of the various suburban communities, we chose to make Eagan our home. For the past fifteen years I have been in commercial banking specializing in small to medium sized commercial acquisition, development, and construction loans. This varied exposure, plus my own experience building homes and apartments has given me a rich exposure to urban planning, development, and financing. It is during this critical early period of development that knowledgeable and careful planning and decision making must take place to prevent the problems seen in others cities. Eagan is a choice site for both economic and residential development and I am very interested in taking an active part in that development. My resume is available upon request. I :Look forward to wring from you. Sin Patrick D. Crinde Patrick D. Grinde 3529 Widgeon Way South Eagan, MN 55123 452 -8216 August 20,1988 Mr. Tom Hedges City Administrator City of Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55122 Dear Mr. Hedges, I would like to express my interest in serving on the Economic Development Commission. I have been a resident of Eagan for approximately 12 years. My wife and I live in the Parkcliff subdivision along with our two boys. I am a professional city planner with over eleven years of experience in community development and I believe that with my background I may be able to provide some good input. A copy of my resume is enclosed. I would be happy to meet with you at your convenience to discuss the appointment. Sincerely, aul Krauss, AICP 4652 Parkridge Court Eagan, MN 55123 EDUCATION PAUL KRAUSS, AICP 4652 Parkridge Court Eagan, MN 55123 (612) 452 -5366 home (612) 933 -2511 work Master of Regional Planning, Syracuse University, Maxwell Graduate School, 1977 - Graduate Studies in Civil Engineering and Community Planning, University of Vermont, 1975 - Bachelor of Arts in Environmental Planning, Goddard College, 1973 PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATIONS /MEMBERSHIPS - American Institute of_Certified Planners, AICP - American Planning Association - Minnesota Chapter, American Planning Association Elected Secretary of the Minnesota Chapter of the American Planning Association, 19E7. PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE March, 1983 to present, Senior Planner City of Minnetonka, (population 44,000) 14600 Minnetonka Boulevard, Minnetonka, MN 55345 - Responsible for numerous major development projects including: . Minnetonka Corporate Center, a large, high- quality, office /industrial park being developed by the Trammell Crow Co. The park will ultimately contain 1.8 million square feet. . Cliffs of Ridgedale, 450 apartments using tax increment financing in a redevelopment area. Responsible for development design and review procedure and zoning ordinance administration. Regular• presentations to the City Council, Planning Commission and neighborhood groups. Staff liason to a committee appointed by the Mayor, charged with the preparation of a new zoning ordinance. The ordinance was approved in July, 1986 and is now in effect. City representative to the Highway 7 Corridor Study. I -494 Corridor Study - Project Management Team and Joint Powers Organization. Page 1 i3� Resume /Paul Krauss January, 1982 to December, 1982, Project Manager BRW, Inc., 1912 Capitol Avenue, Cheyenne, WY 82001 June, 1979 to January, 1983, Planner /Professional II BRW, Inc., 2829 University Avenue, Minneapolis, MN 55414 - Project Manager, Comprehensive plans for the cities of Evanston and Rock Springs and Uinta County, Wyoming. All three areas were experiencing rapid growth due to energy related development of the Overthrust Belt. Supervised project teams of up to five professionals on each project. - City Planner for Oakdale, MN (population 13,000) for a period of three years. Responsible for site plan reviews, zoning ordinance enforcement and special projects. Supervision of planning staff and coordination of related work by the City Engineer and Building Inspector. Prepared the City Comprehensive Plan and a new zoning ordinance. - Developed a Wild and Scenic River Plan and Ordinance for the upper reaches of the Mississippi River for the Leech Lake Indian Reservation. Also developed a zoning ordinance for the Reservation. - Project Planner preparing neighborhood rehabilitation plans for the West University Neighborhood, Tucson, AZ; Urban East, Minneapolis, MN and the Lower Nicollet Avenue Urban Design Study in Minneapolis, MN. The West University Plan was nominated by the Governor of Arizona for an award from the National Trust for Historic Preservation. - Prepared financing plans to establish two tax increment districts in Chanhassen, MN. Developed zoning ordinance modifications to support redevelopment plans. - Project Planner on teams preparing design studies and impact analysis on the proposed St. Paul Downtown People Mover; Hiawatha Corridor Transportation Study, Hennepin Avenue Transportation /Entertainment "Centrum "; North Crosstown Highway and the Wells- Bricelyn Underground Gas Storage Facility in Minnesota. - Project Planner for the South Inner Drive Feasibility Study, Cheyenne, WY. Page 2 t. Resume /Paul Krauss August, 1978 to August, 1979, Long Range Planner City of Coon Rapids, (population 33,000); MN - Developed the City's Mississippi River Critical Areas Plan. - Participated in_ Comprehensive Plan. June, 1977 to August, 1978, Urban Planner Urbanscope, Inc., Minneapolis, MN - Prepared Environmental Impact Statements for two large (1,000+ housing units) planned unit developments in Eagan, MN. The studies were utilized to obtain HUD Title X financial assistance. - Developed a market analysis report for a commercial/ residential project in Inver Grove Heights, MN. CONTINUING EDUCATION the preparation of the City - Completed a 6 credit course in Wastewater Treatment Plant Operation and Management from California State University, Sacramento, 1975. - Completed a 4 credit Fundamentals of Management Course at the University of Minnesota, 1987. Seminars including: Tax Increment Financing; Real Estate Development Feasibility Analysis; Economic Development and Local Government, Financing Public /Private Partnerships; Successful Supervision. OTHER SKILLS AND EXPERIENCE Prior to attending graduate school, I managed a 0.5 MGD sanitary waste treatement plant in Shelburne, VT. I have been a private pilot for over twelve years. This skill has proven to be useful for aerial photography and an understanding of issues related to airport impacts. Tome Hedges City Hall 3830 Pilot Knob Rd. Eagan, MN 55122 Dear Mr. Hedges: I am writing this letter to express an interest in being appointed to the Advisory Park and Recreation Commission. Listed below is some of the pertinent information about myself that may be of interest to you when deciding on an appointment: - Resident of Eagan for 19 years. - Own home at 4338 Sequoia Dr., and have lived in it for 19 years. - Employed by District 191 for the past 19 years. Currently serving as Associate Principal at Burnsville Senior High School. - Hold a Doctorate in Educational Administration from the University of Minnesota. - Fifty -two years old, married with three grown daughters. - Been employed in public education as teacher and administrator for thirty years. - Taught school in Iowa, Alaska and Minnesota. The above information provides an admitted limited introduction to myself. However, if you would like additional information, please feel free to call me at Home - 454 -6090 or Office- 895 -7335. Theodore Billy September 2, 1988 Agenda Information Memo September 19, 1988, City Council Meeting VARIANCE /OAK CLIFF POND ADDITION B. Variance, Bruttger Companies for a 5' Variance to the Rear Yard Setback on Lots 1 - 6, Block 3, Oak Cliff Pond Addition - -An application was submitted by Bruttger Companies, requesting a 5' variance to the required 30' rear yard setback for Lots 1 - 6, Block 3, Oak Cliff Pond Addition. Enclosed on pages l3( through 137 is a copy of a report prepared by Planning and Engineering discussing the variance application. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny an application by Bruttger Companies requesting a 5' variance to the required 30' rear yard setback for Lots 1 - 6, Block 3, Oak Cliff Pond Addition. SUBJECT: APPLICANT: LOCATION: EXISTING ZONING: DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: DATE OF REPORT: REPORTED BY: VARIANCE BRUTGER COMPANIES LOTS 1 -6, BLOCK 3, OAK CLIFF POND R -3 - WINKLER JACKSON P.D.(82 -3) SEPTEMBER 19, 1988 SEPTEMBER 12, 1988 PLANNING AND ENGINEERING DEPARTMENTS APPLICATION SUMMARY: An application has been submitted by Brutger Companies requesting a 5' variance to the required 30' rear yard setback. PLANNER COMMENTS: The design of the detached townhomes is a "front to back" layout. The applicant anticipates a problem with length of the townhouse fitting onto the lot with their current con- struction plans. They feel the townhomes would be inadequate in size and design with a 30' setback; therfore a 25' setback is- requested by the applicant to enable them to build the desired townhomes. After review, staff has determined the proposed 5' is not deterimental to the development as a whole and would allow the applicant to retain their original design and concept plan as ap- proved by the Council. Additional landscaping could be provided to suitably screen the rear yards from the R -2 district to the south. However, it must be noted that in the conditions for final plat approval, dated June 16, 1987, condition #4 specifically states: ..."" 30' setbacks will be required for the units abutting the R -2 district to the south." If approved the Variance shall be subject to the following conditions: 1. Additional landscaping shall be provided for in the rear yard to provide screening from the R -2 district to the south. A landscaping plan shall be submitted to the planning staff for review and approval. 2. No other variances for these lots shall be applied for. z 0 W 0 0 0. f / t / 1Z7 —OL £C1 wty0n z -� • t ai f . aeN 1 V i • 2 WAY 1 1 :a • k 01 SO1 K L 00 00 w -J ra • pl r. Agenda Information Memo September 19, 1988, City Council Meeting C. Waiver of Plat for Individual Ownership on Addition - -An application a waiver of plat for the for an existing duplex Heights 2nd Addition. WAIVER OF PLAT /MARK CALVIN Mark Calvin, Duplex Lot Split to Allow Lot 7, Block 1, Oakwood Heights 2nd was presented by Mark Calvin requesting purpose of allowing individual ownership described as Lot 7, Block 1, Oakwood For a copy of the staff report, refer to pages ( Y( through )46 ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the waiver of plat for Mark Calvin, Lot 7, Block 1, Oakwood Heights 2nd Addition for the purpose of allowing individual ownership. \3Q APPLICATION SUMMARY g Oui1.Ot 1 0u CITY OF EAGAN SUBJECT: WAIVER OF PLAT APPLICANT: MARK CALAVIN LOCATION: LOT 7, BLOCK 1, OAKWOOD HEIGHTS 2ND EXISTING ZONING: R -2 (DUPLEX) DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: SEPTEMBER 19, 1988 DATE OF REPORT: SEPTEMBER 12, 1988 REPORTED BY: PLANNING DEPARTMENT An application has been submitted by Mr. Mark Calvin requesting a Waiver of Plat for the purpose of allowing individual ownership. The existing duplex, located at lot 7, block 1, Oakwood Heights 2nd Addition (4428/4430 Lynx Court), has separate utilities and complies with setback requirements. �... - - -. .IN'N 404 - .. "... ..-- VD • N{ Pei r• M h r39 ...... 1...1 Issas essoVsfe Mark Calvin 3700 94th St. East Inver Grove Hts., Mn. 55075 x 44.z- 411 1 N 1,0( Westerly line of Lot 7 99.4 x >e/ awes LAND SURVEYORS INC R Undp, laws n1 Tn, SI h n1 M.nn,sola 14750 SOUTH ROBERT TRAIL ROSEMOUNT. MINNESOTA 55068 PHONE 612 423 -1769 e 0 P 4, e ' Dated: March 22, 1985 Revised: Feb. 22, 1988 DELMAR H. SCHWANZ Bk: 88/43 O S URVEYR'S CERTIFICATE SCALE: �v'r JET 99• s TAP "N• 1 inch = 30 feet Elevations shown are existing 1 \ o . "7: 6 0/2 ZA \a // S/ Sf 0 3 o COI 5 . to H .�R• � ao to iZ 1•h. 1 f orp EO ; =• 0 /c1, tsN LO/K b 1 a 0 GROG . V o0 N ti t /4.1 lD 1 %4 f N B s4 -ice -- 7 1f4/ S.f t.61 5 Proposed garage floor elevation Drainage & utility easement v.. L O � 23 12.61 .. 8 /Z.. `4' b b NE'ly line of Lot 7 79.° Most easterly corner of Lot 7 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct representation of Lot 7, Block 1, OAKWOOD HEIGHTS 2ND ADDITION, according to the recorded plat thereof, Dakota County, Minnesota. Also showing the location of a proposed building as staked thereon. MINNESOTA REGISTRATIO NO. 8625 Agenda Information Memo September 19, 1988, City Council Meeting WAIVER OF PLATJZACHMAN BROTHER CONSTRUCTION LOT 1. BLOCK 1. CINNAMON RIDGE 6TH ADDITION D. Waiver of Plat for Zachman Brother Construction Company, Inc., for Duplex Lot Split to Allow Individual Ownership on Lot 1, Block 1, Cinnamon Ridge 6th Addition - -An application was received from Zachman Brothers Construction Company, Inc., requesting a waiver of plat for Lot 1, Block 1, Cinnamon Ridge 6th Addition to allow individual ownership of that duplex unit. Fo ,/a l copy of the staff report, refer to pages through 1� ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny a waiver of plat for Lot 1, Block 1, Cinnamon Ridge 6th Addition, as presented by Zachman Brothers Construction Company, Inc. ��1 CITY OF EAGAN SUBJECT: WAIVER OF PLAT APPLICANT: ZACHMAN BROTHERS CONSTRUCTION CO, INC. LOCATION: LOT 1, BLOCK 1 CINNAMON RIDGE 6TH EXISTING ZONING: PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: SEPTEMBER 19, 1988 DATE OF REPORT: SEPTEMBER 12, 1988 REPORTED BY: PLANNING DEPARTMENT APPLICATION SUMMARY: An application has been submitted by Zachman Brothers Construction Company, Inc. requesting a Waiver of Plat for Lot 1, Block 1, Cinnamon Ridge 6th Addition. The Waiver would allow for individual ownership. The duplex has separate utilities and meets or exceeds all setback requirements. If approved, this Waiver shall be subject to all applicable Code requirements. Cu OI — !41 is •••••••••• ••- l•Ilir'l wN.N••• 'acn Urueger th t;ssazfztes, Inc. 8080 Wallace Road den Prairie, Minnesota 55344 (612) 934 -4242 CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY "JIB MOM 11121111111L. 11111712111111 — Survey for: Z 4cArnkni eao s COALS - T. i JloR.TN SCALE: t` 30' i SURVEYED BY ME THIS 2G DAY OF 5sK 1 4. 5910 ot1Tl-lEASTE21.,4 LNE or SAIO loll That part of Lot 1, Block 1, CINNAMON RIDGE 6TH ADDITION, according to the recorded plat thereof, Dakota County, Minnesota, lying Southwesterly of a line drawn from a point on the Northwesterly line of said Lot 1 distant 34.32 feet, Southwesterly from the Northeast corner of said Lot 1 to a point on the Southeasterly line of said Lot 1 distant 34.86 feet, Southwesterly from the Southeast corner of said Lot 1, as measured along said Lot lines thereof. I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE AND CORRECT REPRESENTATION OF THE BOUNDARIES OF S C.iz AEbeue DAKc r COU',VY,JflNNESOTA. /a6aS ,19 SS lk �: ,•., ...:.;e:: ,,- <, .: Engineering ,. �.... Land Surveying st:ft-;■._d.: -• Landscape Architecture I Job No 8$344, Bk. Pg. No21t1Ea51 co2,NE.R.. of SAto Lo l . (oe,NE2 cF _ _ 3� 5A10 L07 ALD L. GER STATE REGISTRATION NO. 14374 Ulan F ruejer t ftiszactates, Inc. 8080 Wallace Road den Prairie, Minnesota 55344 Survey tor: (8S2) 934.4242 Aci4 mAicl f ,Ro5 05 JST. do R.714 I's 3O MOM MIMI UMW =Ali -. gar . : i v.... SURVEYED BY ME THIS 26yµ DAY OF CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY lq+ 1 ') �ojO Jt9.10 Lai" 1 ar /41111USf .19 SS I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE AND CORRECT REPRESENTATION OF THE BOUNDARIES DRKOY Engineering Land Surveying Landscape Architecture . Planning Job No. °03146, Bk Pg. /do Q11 -EAST Co 11.14E-R. of SAto t_o'? 1• namltAtat: U111.IT'f EA5golcr1 SourazAST LOE teR [oF SA ID Lv'f 1 . That part of Lot 1, Block 1, CINNAMON RIDGE 6TH ADDITION, according to the recorded plat thereof, Dakota County, Minnesota, lying Northeasterly of a line drawn from a point on the Northwesterly line of said Lot 1 distant 34.32 feet, Southwesterly from the Northeast corner of said Lot 1 to a point on the Southeasterly line of said Lot 1 distant 34.86 feet, Southwesterly from the Southeast corner of said Lot 1, as measured along said Lot lines thereof. See 600o v e CO 4 `TY MINNESOTA: RONALD L. KRUEGER STATE REGISTRATION NO 14374 Agenda Information Memo September 19, 1988, City Council Meeting CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT /MARK M. WEIDENHAFT E. Conditional Use Permit for Mark M. Weidenhaft to Allow a Beauty Parlor in an R -1 District - -A public hearing was held by the Advisory Planning Commission at their last regular meeting held on August 30, 1988 to consider an application from Mark M. Weidenhaft for a conditional use permit to operate a beauty salon in an R -1 district at 4345 Rahn Road. The APC is recommending approval to the City Council. ��/// For a copy of the staff report on this item, refer to pages /Y[D through (i/ . For a copy of the APC action, refer to pages r44! ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the conditional use permit as applied for by Mark Weidenhaft for a beauty salon in an R -1 district at 4345 Rahn Road. ��J APPLICATION SUMMARY CITY OF EAGAN SUBJECT: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT APPLICANT: MARK M WEIDENHAFT LOCATION: NE 1/4 OF SECTION 30 EXISTING ZONING: R -1 (SINGLE - FAMILY) DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: AUGUST 23, 1988 DATE OF REPORT: AUGUST 15, 1988 REPORTED BY: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT PLANNING DIVISION An application has been submitted requesting a conditional use permit for a beauty salon in an R -1 (single - family) district at 4345 Rahn Road. This home is located along the west side of Rahn Road just north of Shale Lane. Code permits beauty salons in this zoning district through the conditional use permit process subject to the following conditions: 1. Hours of operation shall be from 8:00 a.m. to 8:30 p.m. only. 2. The only employee shall be an occupant of the household. 3. The parking shall be on -site and shall be limited to two customer automobiles. 4. There shall be no commercial signs advertising the business except for the type of sign that is allowed in R -1 districts. 5. There shall be no over - the - counter sales of merchandise. If approved, this conditional use permit shall be subject to the above - listed conditions. \, U i>*' 4° \lb( \..L'('I Page 2 /PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES August 30, 1988 At this point, Chairman Pawlenty briefly explained to the public the APC procedure for meetings. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - MARK M. WEIDERHAFT The first public hearing of the evening was convened by Chairman Pawlenty in regard to a conditional use permit to allow a beauty parlor in an R -1 (single family) district located at 4345 Rahn Roaa in the northeast quarter of Section 30. Assistant Planner Jim Sturm stated that an application had been submitted requesting a conditional use permit for a beauty salon in an R -1 (single family) district at 4345 Rahn Road. This home is located along the west side of Rahn Road just north of Shale Lane. Mr. Sturm informed the Commission that the City Code permits beauty salons in this zoning district through the conditional use permit process. If approved, the conditional use permit would be subject to conditions listed in the Commission packet. Mark Weiderhaft (applicant) stated that he had done hair for ten years; he had also been in the house for nine. He further stated that the neighbors that he contacted had not complained about the proposed use. There was no public or Commission comments. Merkley moved, Trygg seconded, the motion to close the public hearing and approve a conditional use permit to allow a beauty parlor in an R -1 (single family) district located at 4345 Rahn Road in the northeast quarter of Section 30 subject to the following conditions: 1. Hours of operation shall be from 8:00 a.m. to 8:30 p. m. only. 2. The only employee shall be an occupant of the household. 3. The parking shall be on -site and shall be limited to two customer automobiles. 4. There shall be no commercial signs advertising the business except for the type of sign that is allowed in R -1 districts. 5. There shall be no over - the - counter sales of merchandise. All voted in favor. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - T. F. JAMES COMPANY Chairman Pawlenty opened the next public hearing regarding the application for a conditional use permit to allow an automotive l ervice station with a car wash and a variance for a canopy setback ocated on Lot 3, Block 1, Hilltop Plaza Addition at the northeast ��g Agenda Information Memo September 19, 1988, City Council Meeting CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT /HILLTOP PLAZA F. Conditional Use Permit, T.F. James Company, to Allow an Automotive Service Station with a Car Wash and a Variance for a Canopy Setback Located on Lot 3, Block 1, Hilltop Plaza Addition - -A public hearing was held by the Advisory Planning Commission at their last regular meeting held on August 30, 1988 to consider a conditional use permit to allow motor fuel sales in a neighbor- hood business district, a pylon sign and a six foot pump island canopy variance for a free standing PDQ facility, as requested by the T.F. James Company, in Hilltop Plaza Addition. The APC is recommending approval of the conditional use permit. There was no action required by the APC on variances, however, the APC shares a strong sentiment to not allow any gas pump island expansion in the future. For additional information on this item, refer i to the staff report, a copy is enclosed on pages I : S U through (,C). For a copy of the APC action on this item, refer to page(s) ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny 1) a conditional use permit to allow an automotive service station with a car wash and 2) a variance for a canopy setback for a free standing PDQ on Lot 3, Block 1, Hilltop Plaza Addition. las CITY OF EAGAN SUBJECT: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT, VARIANCE APPLICANT: T F JAMES CO LOCATION: LOT 3, BLOCK 1, HILLTOP PLAZA ADDITION SW 1/4 OF SECTION 22 EXISTING ZONING: NB (NEIGHBORHOOD BUSINESS) DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: AUGUST 23, 1988 DATE OF REPORT: AUGUST 15, 1988 REPORTED BY: PLANNING AND ENGINEERING DEPARTMENTS APPLICATION SUMMARY Separate applications have been submitted requesting a conditional use permit to allow motor fuel sales in . a neighborhood business district, a pylon sign, and a 6' pump island canopy variance for a free- standing PDQ facility located at the northeast intersection of Pilot Knob Road and Diffley Road. In June 1987, a conditional use application for a car wash /tune- up shop and a variance for a building with a lot coverage above 20o were denied by the Advisory Planning Commission. The applicant then withdrew the item before it was heard by the City Council. This proposal shifts the existing PDQ at the west end of the strip center onto lot 3 as a free- standing facility. The existing area will be leased to other neighborhood business -type users. SITE PLAN Access to this site will be provided through a new right in /right out along Pilot Knob Road, the full movement location from Berry Ridge Road to the north that has a frontage road in front of Beautiful Savior Lutheran Church and the existing drive connecting to Hilltop Lane. The 3,500- square -foot building will be constructed with brick and have a gabled roofline and wood facade to match the existing strip center. The lot coverage, including the canopy, is 15% in a 20o- allowable district. The 6' canopy variance is along the Diffley Road side. If the canopy and pump islands were shifted to the north slightly, the variance would not be necessary. The applicant is proposing this plan with the idea that two more pump islands may be requested in the future. A variance for that canopy would definitely be necessary. All other code parking and building setbacks have been satisfied. Code requires twenty parking stalls; twenty -two have been provided, with 9' -wide stalls for employee -only use on the south side of the building. (Sc) HILLTOP PLAZA ADDITION A one -way traffic flow to the north on the east side of the building in the car wash area has been proposed. This system works well since the public access into the convenience store is on the northwest corner of the building. The trash is being contained in the building in the southeast corner. The car wash facility will be similar to the one at the Town Centre automotive center serving only one car at a time with blow- drying capabilities. The proposed pylon sign at the southwest property line contains 88 sq. ft. of signage area per side and has a 20' maximum height. At the City's request, a landscape plan has been prepared for the entire length of the Pilot Knob Road property line instead of just the subject area. This plan reflects the standards that have been established since the time of the strip center construction. The plan is well -done and will add an aesthetic cohesiveness to the neighborhood retail complex. (S GRADING /DRAINAGE /EROSION CONTROL: The proposed site was previously rough graded with the initial development of the Hilltop ?laza. Minimal grading is required to develop the proposed facility. The proposed drainage plan shows that the entire site generated storm water runoff be surface drained northerly to the existing storm sewer located in the northerly adjacent bituminous parking lot. The existing storm sewer lines are of adequate size to handle the additional site generated runoff, but the two existing catch basins are not of sufficient capacity to handle the increase in the runoff. The development will be required to either reconstruct the two existing catch basins to handle the increase in runoff or otherwise construct a catch basin at the northeast corner of the proposed development and connect to the existing 13" storm sewer line northeasterly of the catch basin. No erosion and sediment control plan was submitted as a part of this application. UTILITIES: A 6" water stub is located at the northeast corner of the property and is of adequate capacity and pressure to serve the proposed development. A sanitary sewer service will need to be constructed to the east and connect into the existing 3" service line located easterly of the development. STREETS /ACCESS /CIRCULATION: No public street access is immediately adjacent to the proposed development. Access will be from the adjacent parking lot located on the north side. Circulation within the proposed development will flow from west to east with a one way proposed along the easterly side of the building. The proposed one way along the easterly side should be at least 18' wide. This 18' wide width is sufficient to allow a car to pass around a stalled car if the need arises. EASEMENTS /RIGHTS -OF- WAY /PERMITS: Sufficent right -of -way for Pilot Knob Road and Diffley Road has been provided. Restricted access has been dedicated along the southerly and westerly sides of the development in accordance with requirements from Dakota County. The development will be responsible to provide the appropriate drainage and utility easements to accommodate the proposed utility construction. The development will be responsible for acquiring all regulatory agency permits within the appropriate time frame as required by the affected agencies. ASSESSMENTS: A search of City special assessment records show the following pending assessments of record: PROJ 4 DESCRIPTION RATE QUANTITY AMOUNT 466 Pilot Knob and Diffley Road Upgrade $82.37/ff 324.82 $26,755 466 Trailway $12.40 /ff 324.82 $ 4,028 TOTAL, PENDING ASSESSMENT $30,783 Trie following assessment is proposed in accordance with Special Assessment Policy 82 -1: PROJ # DESCRIPTION RATE QUANTITY AMOUNT 24/466(b) Lateral Benefit Trunk Water Main $21.60 /ff 249.82(a) $5,396 TOTAL PROPOSED ASSESSMENT $5,396 (a) Includes a 150 foot corner lot credit. (b) Water main added to Project 4466 by Contract Change Order CONDITIONS 1. All signage shall be subject to the one -time sign fee of $2.50 per square foot. 2. No exterior sales displays or loudspeaker advertising shall be permitted. 3. All trash shall be contained within the building. 4. The landscaping along the entire length of the Pilot Knob Road property line shall be installed with this development. 4. The development is required to provide an additional catch basin for collection of site generated storm water runoff and convey it to the existing storm sewer system. 5. The development is required to construct a sanitary sewer manhole in place of the proposed clean out. 6. 7. This development shall accept its additional assessment obligations as defined in the staff's report in accordance with the final plat dimensions and the rates in effect at the time of the conditional use permit. 8. A detailed grading, drainage, erosion, and sediment control plan must be prepared in accordance with current City standards and approved by staff prior to conditional use permit approval. 9. The proposed 16 foot wide one -way driving aisle is required to be 18 feet wide. This development shall be responsible for the acquisition of all regulatory agency permits in the time frame required by the affected agency. I; ' '''' ‘...-" ' .."... ''' ' ...., -..-- r ..... 4 .....•...-----.... , L i coma ■ , ,--co , "f.,' --- - -1...,,,, t Aftno • - ' "or" ....--ciFsr-----sr-11 ..,.. • ,_ wr -, , 55 Z ' • s. e .5 • - t ,st 614-S:• s 7-f 1 l af s , 1..ax£ " ,•-t.•73 ; • ••-••••••tt , . tt-L • 1, : • ;. • t•-■'".; %..tr • • ' !qt....VC/LI • t t - I; gi pgiv tr.w4, PAM. I , _ • -- 1 ; • . 777 • .• ! • ‘,..1 11 tfl z c KNOB ROAD 1CO. RD. 31) t CAR WASH I r"" 1 • r- r --1 1 1 1 Li / •••• HILLTOP PLAZA - PD0 E•GAN, N. SITE PLAN 2 I \ • 0 V 0 at 1 Lti c t — - g011.14 113 ta t_ • 4 s(P (51 ; 'Y 1` 1 • . • ; , I - , • - • . : • . , . 2 a- 0 sj : 11 zi jp : A .1 - - 2 \'\ Crest TME 1...A*T• Ow- 41".• P C9 ‘stoecc, ALESSI. if SC110.1 I 1 4 1 i q._ 4-ch I s.- „ , _6,, ,A_ A 3-ch i 1123 - 15s" term -1 ; -,---=.- ■L."-s, 4 - - - 23- do 4 ' planting schedual -114y ••••••••■••••■■ 2 Arn ••■•••••••• •••••••••■,, 78-do ■"""• 2•et.t •■•••• •-••••:•:' " '''''''' ••••• • Ca•••••••• • I 16-50 •nall• 1••••••1•• •••••••• ''''''' • • 18 ■• .1•••••••• •••••• OOOOO •••■ 11•10,•1,• 19 ...... •••••••••• 17 ••• •■••••# $.11••••••••••• ........... • ••••••••• • • ?kW 4. M 12 - A 6 . Ir F 1S•rh : L .1••••• .•■•• ....... •••. M.o.% ••• ••••••• 1.•••••• j•••••••••• ••• 11.11•• (AY Yoe ..... 1.•••••• ..... •••■••••••• Z I e sa notes: scale 1 r■rn• 40 tee: 0 100 15.0tt ILE•t TC b.CL•CMC ty L 3.1t.aea .AU* . ...1t*A.A•ta CLC •.1111.C.M. • 0 t : 10 LE .:;, ft e E Au m4.4„, -. ..t..e_eme.../ t..6•••, t••• 0....errf A.F.CA TEO- 111••••• 0 to. 0 0 0 0 z L 17: ; 1.9-14•1 111,-.11111111 HSVM lop 1 • I At 0 111111111 Oil MN OM MI MN ME MS MINIM NO MIMI 1=1011•1111MMINIINIMINIIIININI (1£ '08 '03) 0V08 EI0N>1 1011d at 5 1 1 1 1 1 a C 0 >- w U. tA. a i f 4 526/t70 P '590 /16- c city of eagan PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMEN 828/94 Cl? „c..■ 10 94/1070 6( 0/65 0 2 ' . . . 187.0/98.0 •-■ • .. . . ■•"" • • 902'/ TH3M,4; ij 101,01 / • • Y 83.4/91.0 \ 4 3 2 / 358o / V6 3 / [10201 88.0 • , • ! • .— qe 1D 2 11 59 9/75 'Mow 11•111=1 11■11.11 OFD 59 6 / 760 7 , ---\ • , TL'r :4:2:§i5 7.0 . 1 - - s , 68.0/ 12 , •s: 12" e lii• *si.ii i' awe se■ err t , 'T •••01 ,_. __, , - f 7-7 ' - 7 L., — I :.:=:, ;I ■ ..:.'.1.3",'"i ., 4 7 . ';'' . 1. ...ti t... _... ; ;11 , t .. Ig u • - y -,1 ; -- r . 'i• •-• 12- 4 • ; - ..7 --- . 1 . 12, * -- )i,:i , !, - - , ,< . . f r•. ( ' '` - 'is-:.- 1 - 1 _.:.■,, 3 4,... , ,,,' Z ;IbLiip....),:s-11----:-1,"--=-----------7._"— i . 1.•- < .i , --, r-q=i ..:-., 1 ,L1, Li -.-1- 1 01. SITE - j_14 M41;1:1" ) "' , 110201 IMMO in.. -farm -err 35 5/50.0 YT 1i o oi 70.5/74.01 1 77 2 M.G. GROUND STORAGE 1:. H. W. U. 1055 \ 3000 G.P. M. BOOSTER SUBJECT PARCEL • WATER MASTER PLAN " • • • 12 ;,!. - 1 ',Y 512/ 6 7 .0 . ' 24 I - 1' 24 r •7r 2 4 approved: FIG #3 standard plate 4: Page 2 /PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES August 30, 1988 At this point, Chairman Pawlenty briefly explained to the public the APC procedure for meetings. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - MARK M. WEIDERHAFT The first public hearing of the evening was convened by Chairman Pawlenty in regard to a conditional use permit to allow a beauty parlor in an R -1 (single family) district located at 4345 Rahn Road in the northeast quarter of Section 30. Assistant Planner Jim Sturm stated that an application had been submitted requesting a conditional use permit for a beauty salon in an R -1 (single family) district at 4345 Rahn Road. This home is located along the west side of Rahn Road just north of Shale Lane. Mr. Sturm informed the Commission that the City Code permits beauty salons in this zoning district through the conditional use permit process. If approved, the conditional use permit would be subject to conditions listed in the Commission packet. Mark Weiderhaft (applicant) stated that he had done hair for ten years; he had also been in the house for nine. He further stated that the neighbors that he contacted had not complained about the proposed use. There was no public or Commission comments. Merkley moved, Trygg seconded, the motion to close the public hearing and approve a conditional use permit to allow a beauty parlor in an R -1 (single family) district located at 4345 Rahn Road in the northeast quarter of Section 30 subject to the following conditions: 1. Hours of operation shall be from 8:00 a.m. to 8:30 p.m. only. 2. The only employee shall be an occupant of the household. 3. The parking shall be on -site and shall be limited to two customer automobiles. 4. There shall be no commercial signs advertising the business except for the type of sign that is allowed in R -1 districts. 5. There shall be no over -the- counter sales of merchandise. All voted in favor. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - T. F. JAMES COMPANY Chairman Pawlenty opened the next public hearing regarding the application for a conditional use permit to allow an automotive l ervice station with a car wash and a variance for a canopy setback ocated on Lot 3, Block 1, Hilltop Plaza Addition at the northeast (cA Page 3 /PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES August 30, 1988 intersection of Pilot Knob Road and Diffley Road in the southeast quarter of Section 22. Assistant City Planner Jim Sturm stated that separate applications had been submitted requesting a conditional use permit to allow motor fuel sales in a neighborhood business district, a pylon sign and a 6 -foot pump island canopy variance for a free - standing PDQ facility located at the northeast intersection of Pilot Knob Road and Diffley Road. Mr. Sturm stated that this proposal shifts the existing PDQ at the west end of the strip center onto Lot 3 as a free - standing facility. The existing area would then be leased to other neighborhood business -type users. Mr. Sturm stated that access would be provided through a right -in, right -out along Pilot Knob Road. Mr. Sturm then described the type of construction materials, the lot coverage, the canopy size and further explained that the 6 -toot canopy variance is along the Diffley Road side. He stated that if the canopy and pump islands were shifted to the north slightly, the variance would not be necessary and that the applicant is proposing this plan with the idea that two more pump islands may be requested in the future. Mr. Sturm stated that a variance for that canopy would definitely be necessary. He stated that all other Code parking and building setbacks had been satisfied. A one -way traffic flow to the north on the east side of the building and the car wash area has been proposed. Mr. Sturm further stated that the trash is being contained in the building and in the southeast corner and that the car wash facility would be similar to the one at the Town Centre Automotive Center serving only one car at a time. Mr. Sturm concluded with the statement that at the City's request, a landscape plan had been prepared for the entire length of the Pilot Knob Road property line instead of just the subject area and that this plan reflects the standards that have been established since the time of the strip center construction. He added that the plan is well done and will add an asthetic cohesiveness to the neighborhood retail complex. Dick Quanbeck of T. F. James Company (developer) briefly explained the development to the Planning Commission. He explained the details of relocating the PDQ store; briefly explained the landscaping and architectural design and stated that he would be available to answer any questions from the Commission. There was no public comment. Member Trygg asked staff if there was any type of curb on the east side of the development. Mr. Sturm pointed out the curbing to Member Trygg. Member Miller wanted to know how far the pumps were from the daycare center. Mr. Sturm stated about 135 to 140 feet. Member Voracek asked about the outside display of merchandise. He wanted to know whether this was an ordinance or a condition requirement. Mr. Sturm stated that it should be a condition of the Page 4 /PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES August 30, 1988 development. Member Graves pointed out that the condition should be renumbered 1 through 10. He then asked if the landscaping in condition 4 was along the entire frontage of Diffley. Mr. Sturm stated yes, but only to the end of the developer's property. Member Graves requested clarification whether there would be a right -in, right -out access on Pilot Knob. Mr. Sturm stated yes that there would. Member Graves then requested to know the hours of operation. The developer stated the PDQ would be open 24 hours. Member Merkley then asked if the store was open 24 hours now. Member Graves stated no, from his familiarity with the area, he knew that it was open only until midnight and that there were currently no 24 hour stations in the area and that this might remedy that situation. Member Merkley stated that his biggest concern was that four pumps would be sufficient for a convenience store and that the variance for the canopy would not be necessary. Member Graves concurred with Member Merkley's assessment. Member Voracek stated that PDQ was a convenience store just like Super America. Member Merkley distinguished Super America from a PDQ. Member Miller stated that limiting the number of pumps would put PDQ at a competitive disadvantage in respect to Super America. Member Voracek said that PDQ should be able to compete with a Super America. Member Merkley stated that a Super America would not tit in this neighborhood. Member Voracek requested from staff whether the Super America parcel on Yankee Doodle was larger or smaller than the PDQ parcel. Mr. Sturm stated he was not sure but that the zoning for the PDQ is Neighborhood Business and the zoning for the Super America is General Business. Member Miller inquired whether a gas operation belongs in a Neighborhood Business area and that there was a problem with gasoline being so close to children regardless of the number of pumps. The developer replied that the safety standards were high for the development. Member Miller requested to know what the old PDQ would be used as. The developer stated that retail use was planned for the area but that no definite tenants had been signed as of yet. Member Miller then commented that the landscaping was currently minimal in the area and wanted to know if the landscaping would be sufficient after development. The developer stated that the plan is good in regards to landscaping and that they knew of the construction plans for the future, therefore, no past landscaping was done. Member Graves inquired as to whether the developer was aware of a path before road construction. He stated that people are currently walking through the church lot to get to the PDQ and wanted to know if there could be a pathway through the property that could be kept shoveled. The developer stated that yes they had discussed this with staff and they were constructing a path. Mr. Sturm stated that he did not want to romote unsafe crossing of an intersection. Member Graves then stated that perhaps a fence would be a way to keep them from ��3 Page 5 /PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES August 30, 1988 doing so. Member Voracek then stated that perhaps the church lot should be fenced rather than the PDQ lot. A long discussion then ensued about the fencing ana the pathway used by the public that crossed Diffley before the intersection. Chairman Pawlenty statea that he did not want to encourage people to cross in unsafe intersections. City Engineer Foertsch also statea that the City and County should not promote crossing of roads except for crosswalks. Mr. Miller then reiterated his concern that the nature of the complex may not be conducive to gas pumps. The developer stated that other tenants are very supportive of the pumps. Member Miller wanted to know if daycare was supportive. The developer stated that they were not tenants in the complex. Mr. Graves also stated the gas facility should not expand and would like it limited voluntarily by the developer. Member Garry asked how many pumps there would be in the present plan and the developer stated four. Member Miller stated that if four were ok, more than four also should be ok and the PDQ should be allowed to compete, but that he still questioned the presence of any gas pumps at all. Member Graves did not want to promote any more gas than required. Chairman Pawlenty suggested that they could make that as a condition and that this facility is different from a Super America. Member Miller stated that four pumps may be an inconvenience as well. Member Garry questioned condition 2 prohibiting exterior sales displays and wanted to know why Rainbow could do it and not PDQ. Mr. Sturm stated that the City likes to control the areas that they can. Member Graves said there should be a comma after the word "sales" in condition 2. Mr. Sturm stated he would insert a comma at that point. Chairman Pawlenty wanted to know from the Council whether they wanted to allow a conditional use that would permit greater intensity use in the area. Member Miller also stated that they would be increasing intensity with this conditional use. Member Trygg inquired of the purpose of the conditional use. Member Merkley commented that all conditional uses increase intensity. Chairman Pawlenty stated that his understanding of a conditional use was that a conditional use is permitted if it meets the conditions set by the City. Dale Runkle stated that that understanding was correct. Trygg moved, Merkley seconded, the motion to close the public hearing and approve a conditional use permit to allow an automotive service station with a car wash and a pylon sign located on Lot 3, Block 1, Hilltop Plaza Addition at the northeast intersection of Pilot Knob Road and Diffley Road in the southeast quarter of Section 22 subject to the following conditions: 1. All signage shall be subject to the one -time sign fee of $2.50 per square foot. Page 6 /PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES August 30, 1988 2. No exterior sales, displays or loudspeaker advertising shall be permitted. 3. All trash shall be contained within the building. 4. The landscaping along the entire length of the Pilot Knob Road property line shall be installed with this development. 5. The development is required to provide an additional catch basin for collection of site - generated storm water run -off and convey it to the existing storm sewer system. 6. The development is required to construct a sanitary sewer manhole in place of the proposed clean -out. 7. The proposed 16 -foot wide one -way driving isle is required to be 18 -feet wide. 8. This development shall accept its additional assessment obligations as defined in the staff's report in accordance with the final plat dimensions and the rates in effect at the time of the conditional use permit. 9. Detailed grading, drainage, erosion and sediment control plan must be prepared in accordance with current City standards and approved by staff prior to conditional use permit approval. 10. This development shall be responsible for the acquisition of all regulatory agency permits in the time frame required by the affected agency. 11. The amount of gas pumps shall be limited to the proposed four pumps. Pawlenty, Miller, Trygg, Merkley, Garry and Graves voted in favor; Voracek voted against. Member Voracek stated his opposition was due to the fact that he did not think that gas pumps should be limited. WAIVER OF PLAT - OPUS CORPORATION Chairman Pawlenty opened the next public hearing regarding the • application for a Waiver of Plat in order to split Lots 14 and 16, Block 7, of the Eagandale Center Industrial Park and combine them into two lots consisting of 7.2 acres and a conditional use permit for outside storage and a pylon sign located along west service road in the east half of Section 3. Agenda Information Memo September 19, 1988, City Council Meeting WAIVER OF PLAT /NATIONAL MINERALS CORPORATION G. Waiver of Plat for National Minerals Corporation in Order to Split Lot 10, Block 2, Eagandale Center Industrial Park 3rd Addition located along the south side of Lone Oak Road, East of Lunar Lane - -A public hearing was held by the Advisory Planning Commission at their last regular meeting held on August 30, 1988 to consider an application by National Minerals Corporation /NSP for a waiver of plat in order to split Lot 10, Block 2, Eagandale Industrial Park 3rd Addition and combine it with Lots 4, 5, and 6 to the immediate south. The purpose of the waiver of plat is to allow for the construction of a 30,000 square foot storage building to be constructed this fall. For additional information n this item, refer to the staff report enclosed on pages LC L through ` ? 2_ For a copy of the APC action on s ) em, refer to those minutes enclosed on pages l? ',through ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the waiver of plat for National Minerals Corporation /NSP on Lot 10, Block 2, Eagandale Industrial Park 3rd Addition. \ 6'.0 SUBJECT: WAIVER OF PLAT APPLICANT: NATIONAL MINERALS CORPORATION /NSP LOCATION: LOT 10, EAGANDALE INDUSTRIAL PARK 3RD NE 1/4 OF SECTION 11 EXISTING ZONING: LI (LIGHT INDUSTRIAL) DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: AUGUST 23, 1988 DATE OF REPORT: AUGUST 15, 1988 REPORTED BY: PLANNING AND ENGINEERING DEPARTMENTS APPLICATION SUMMARY CITY OF EAGAN An application has been submitted requesting a Waiver of Plat in order to split lot 10, block 2 of the Eagandale Industrial Park 3rd Addition and combine it with lots 4, 5, and 6 to the immediate south. National Minerals Corporation, a fly ash distributor, is located on those lots. Currently, NSP has a transmission area on the northern portion of the 5.9 -acre subject lots. The newly- created parcel "B" containing 2.7 acres will have access from a drive along the east side of lot 6. A 30,000- square -foot fly ash storage building will be constructed this fall. Fly ash will be transported to this concrete building by either the railroad spur along the south property line of lot 10 or by semi trucks. It is used as an ingredient in concrete and_is a noncombustible material. All code requirements have been satisfied. GRADING /DRAINAGE /EROSION CONTROL: The grading and drainage plan submitted as a part of this Waiver of Plat provide information pertaining to site grading only. No information was provided concerning the site generated storm water runoff. The proposed grading plan shows site development being accomplished with an insignificant amount of site grading required. The development will be required to intercept the site generated storm water runoff into an internal storm sewer system and convey this site generated storm water runoff to the existing storm sewer utility located in Lone Oak Road. The proposed development will be responsible for providing a 1.0 acre -foot storage storm water ponding area prior to discharging into the existing 24" storm sewer along Lone Oak Road. The proposed construction poses no serious erosion /sediment control problems. The development will be required to provide information pertaining to the conveyance of the site' generated storm water runoff to the existing storm sewer utility in Lone Oak Road. The proposed Waiver of Plat creates parcel which has no public street access immediately available. The development will be responsible for constructing the proposed parking lot area in accordance with City Code requirements. UTILITIES: No sanitary sewer or water service are proposed or required of this development. The proposed development is to be utilized as a storage warehouse only. EASEMENTS /RIGHTS -OF- WAY /PERMITS: The development will be required to provide appropriate ponding easements and utility easements for those public utilities constructed outside of the public right -of -way and required by the proposed site development. All regulatory agency permits shall be acquired within the appropriate time frame as required by the affected agency. ASSESSMENTS: A search of the City's special assessment records show no pending assessments of record for this parcel and the following assessment is proposed a condition of the Waiver: DESCRIPTION RATE QUANTITY AMOUNT Lone Oak Road Upgrade $111.70 /ff 207.12 $23,135.00 TOTAL PROPOSED ASSESSMENT $23,135.00 ��4 CONDITIONS: WAIVER OF PLAT - NATIONAL MINERALS CORPORATION 1. The development is required to fulfill the $23,135 assessment obligation identified for Lone Oak Road upgrade. 2. The development will be required to provide a 1.0 acre foot ponding area prior to discharging its site generated storm water into the existing 24" storm sewer in Lone Oak Road. 3. This • levelopment shall dedicate, Provide, or financially guarantee its proportionate share of the acquisition costs of additional drainage, oonding, and utility easements as reauired by the alignment, depth, and storage capacity of all required public utilities and streets located beyond the 'boundaries of this plat or outside of dedicated _public right -of -way as necessary to service this development. 4. All public streets and utilities necessary to provide service to this development shall be designed by a registered professional engineer in accordance with City codes and engineering standards and policies, and approved by staff prior to Waiver of ?lat approval. 5. A detailed grading, drainage, erosion, and sediment control plan must be prepared in accordance with current City standards and approved by staff prior to Waiver of Plat approval. 6. This development shall be responsible for the acquisition of all regulatory agency Permits in the time fame required by the affected agency. 7. The development is required to construct the proposed parking area in accordance with City Code requirements. 8. The development is required to provide an internal storm sewer system which intercepts the site generated runoff and conveys this site generated runoff to the existing storm sewer system in Lone Oak Road. 9. The development will be required to provide public access to the newly created Parcel B. 1-- r LiNo—t t9 riAr _11%4-1. 1', 1 P,o4 h Ar - - - 2 pMM L i a 1�i 1 O r ; 9 I— 7 Q N � y cx 0 ^ &O III ti ..�'.t�i i i , i � � tl stg .,.' ( � tvt a % lt 1 t lilt i j gJ I ' t t ' 111 t i I li a Q 'l � e 111 , ,ti � , Z 1t ill ., III I. 1 :1i 1- l z / LL ° / / u: 4" / ' / / N Z z / , / / ./ / o / / 0 N / / _ t / / 113 / p `v ' 4 / ff er // , . t . , / / ' i S '�, Q ,4 \ / --„./ v y - , ... t a- 0 . i ti 1. Q i L a: SI • 1 t ' N 1 1 1 • 121 at '`I fall* lea as 1 , 1•1 • al 'a! 11, 1113 � ; 11 1 J 1' I f ;ii ' 1'I ai i I 't . , }1i 1 r11 ff li ttt / 1 1. t11 I 111 1'1 1,, VIII; • 1 ' 1 i-1 1 1 1 s 1,i 1 , t, ,3 1 1 1 ;' ii ='.�1 111111 f i ; +1 1 1 il il i 11: 1 1 11 • f t i�.] 114 j!!,1111 1111 11 11.1 I 11 1 11 ,lti *i 1iil LI 4 1 ', -' ( a y 1 pt i , / t �! E , ,r ' � a y } �,./,' %/ •1 1 Pp- D tr2 —a-- 4 Z 1 : • pl .1 �• 1 1 • ` p • 1 -. I ' • N,.4. . m mI:ill T t p 1 ! _ al , ,n N 1 1 1 • 121 at '`I fall* lea as 1 , 1•1 • al 'a! 11, 1113 � ; 11 1 J 1' I f ;ii ' 1'I ai i I 't . , }1i 1 r11 ff li ttt / 1 1. t11 I 111 1'1 1,, VIII; • 1 ' 1 i-1 1 1 1 s 1,i 1 , t, ,3 1 1 1 ;' ii ='.�1 111111 f i ; +1 1 1 il il i 11: 1 1 11 • f t i�.] 114 j!!,1111 1111 11 11.1 I 11 1 11 ,lti *i 1iil LI 4 1 ', -' ( a y 1 pt i , / t �! E , ,r ' � a y } �,./,' %/ •1 1 Pp- D tr2 —a-- 4 Z 1 : • pl .1 �• 1 Page 8 /PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES August 30, 1988 service road in the east half of Section 3, subject to the following conditions: 1. The development limit its storm water outflow into the City storm sewer to 0.5 cfs. 2. The proposed entrances from public right -of -way are required to be 30 feet wide with concrete valley gutters. 3. All public streets and utilities necessary to provide service to this development shall be designed by a registered professional engineer in accordance with City Codes and engineering standards and policies and approved by staff prior to recording of Waiver. 4. A detailed grading, drainage, erosion and sediment control plan must be prepared in accordance with current City standards and approved by staff prior to recording of Waiver. 5. If any public improvements are to be installed under a City contract, the appropriate project must be approved by Council action prior to recording of Waiver. 6. This development shall be responsible for the acquisition of all regulatory agency permits in the time frame required by the affected agency. 7. All signs shall be subject to the one -time sign fee of $2.50 per square foot. 8. The developer and owner of the southerly portion of Lot 14 shall combine this parcel of land with the southerly portion of Lot 16 under one tax identification parcel number with the Dakota County Auditor. All voted in favor. WAIVER OF PLAT - NATIONAL MINERALS CORPORATION Chairman Pawlenty opened the next public hearing regarding the application for a Waiver of Plat in order to split Lot 10, Eagandale Center Industrial Park 3rd Addition, located along the south side of Lone Oak Road, east of Lunar Lane in the northeast quarter of Section 11. Assistant City Planner Jim Sturm stated that an application had been submitted requesting a Waiver of Plat in order to split Lot 10 and combine it with Lots 4, 5, and 6 to the immediate south. National Minerals Corporation, a fly -ash distributor, is located on those lots. Currently NSP has a transmission area on the northern portion of the subject lots. This newly created parcel B will have access from a drive along the east side of -Lot 6. A fly -ash storage building Page 9 /PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES August 30, 1988 will be constructed this fall. Fly -ash will be transported to this building by either railroad or by semi - trucks. He stated that it was used as an ingredient in concrete and is a non - combustible material and that all Code requirements had been satisfied. Mr. Sturm further stated that the grading and drainage plan submitted as a part of this Waiver of Plat provide information pertaining to site grading only and that no information was provided concerning the site generated storm water run -off. John Klein appeared on behalf of the developer and explained the need for the expansion due to the increased business. He reiterated that they were buying the land from NSP and explained the product use. He did question the assessment obligation outlined in condition 1. There was no public comment. Member Garry questioned whether the first condition dealing with the assessment obligation was an unusual condition. Member Voracek stated that this normally was not a condition. Assistant City Engineer Mike Foertsch stated that in Waiver of Plat applications, the City did not have standard conditions. Member Voracek asked Mr. Foertsch if assessments were based on frontage. Mr. Foertsch replied yes. Mr. Voracek inquired as to whether the assessment must be paid before the lot is split. He further stated he felt the assessment should fall on the utility and not the mineral company. Mr. Foertsch stated that the total parcel is used to determine the assessment before the split is made and that the developer can assign the assessment to either parcel A or B. He said the obligation could be met by the developer paying the assessment or NSP can agree to pay the assessment. The developer then questioned why the developer was being assessed and not the utility at a future date. Mr. Foertsch replied that in order for NSP to split, they must pay off the obligation. To repeat, Mr. Foertsch replied that in order for NSP to split, they must pay off the obligation that they owe. Member Graves said that the City merely wanted to make sure that the assessment is recorded and that it is on record that money is owed. He further stated that the Planning Commission did not deal with assessments and that the matter should be brought before the City Council. Member Voracek inquired if the building was only on Parcel B. Mr. Sturm replied yes. Member Voracek then asked if the mineral company could sell a piece of the land off. Mr. Sturm replied that they would then need another waiver and would have to come before the Planning Commission again. Chairman Pawlenty questioned the landscaping time table and Mr. Sturm explained it to him. Graves moved, Merkley seconded, the motion to approve a Waiver of Plat in order to split Lot 10, Eagandale Center Industrial Park Third Addition located along the south side of Lone Oak Road east of Lunar Lane in the northeast quarter of Section 11, subject to the following conditions: Page 10 /PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES August 30, 1988 1. The development is required to fulfill the $23,135.00 assessment obligation identified for Lone Oak Road upgrade. 2. The development will be required to provide a 1.0 acre foot ponding area prior to discharging its site - generated storm water into the existing 24 -inch storm sewer in Lone Oak Road. 3. This development shall dedicate, provide or financially guarantee its proportionate share of the acquisition costs of additional drainage, ponding and utility easements as required by the alignment, depth and storage capacity of all required public utilities and streets located beyond the boundaries of this plat or outside of dedicated public right -of -way as necessary to service this development. 4. All public streets and utilities necessary to provide service to this development shall be designed by a registered professional engineer in accordance with City Codes and engineering standards and policies and approved by staff prior to Waiver of Plat approval. 5. A detailed grading, drainage, erosion and sediment control plan must be prepared in accordance with current City standards and approved by staff prior to Waiver of Plat approval. 6. This development shall be responsible for the acquisition of all regulatory agency permits in the time frame required by the affected agency. 7. The development is required to construct the proposed parking area in accordance with City Code requirements. 8. The development is required to provide an internal storm sewer system which intercepts the site- generated run -off and conveys this site - generated run -off to the existing storm sewer system in Lone Oak Road. 9. The development will be required to provide public access to the newly created Parcel B. OAR MEADOW ADDITION - MERITOR DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION Chairman Pawlenty opened the next public hearing regarding the application for a Planned Development amendment, a re- zoning of 21.5 LB (Limited Business) zoned acres with the Blackhawk Park Planned Development to an R -1 (Single Family) district consisting of 30 lots located between Highway 35E and Pilot Knob Road and south of Englert Road in the southeast quarter of Section 16. Assistant City Planner Jim Sturm stated separate applications had been submitted requesting a Planned Development amendment and that this plan is in conformance with the City's most recent land use l�� Agenda Information Memo September 19, 1988, City Council Meeting PRELIMINARY PLAT /RIDGE HAVEN ADDITION H. Preliminary Plat for Ridge Haven Addition /Haven Enterprises for 5.2 R -1 Acres Consisting of 14 Lots Located East of Highway 13 and South of Sibley Hills Drive - -The Advisory Planning Commission and City Council have reviewed a preliminary plat proposal entitled Ridge Haven Addition as presented by Haven Enterprises early this summer. This subdivision is adjacent to a plat that was approved entitled Prettyman Heights. At the direction of the City Council, the City staff was asked to coordinate meetings with the developers of Ridge Haven Acres and Prettyman Heights and make efforts to agree on a road configuration for all parties concerned, including the City of Eagan. According to the Engineering Department, the City has not been able to reach agreement with both parties. The developer of Ridge Haven Acres would like the City Council to readdress the preliminary plat and has submitted a l er for Council consideration enclosed on pages 1-)-?through e . The public hearing for considering public improvements is scheduled for the October 4 meeting and it is customary that a preliminary plat be approved prior to a public hearing to consider public improvements for the proposed subdivision. Also enclosed for Council review is a Planning ang ineering tment report, a copy is enclosed on pages through � `1• The Director of Public Works will discuss the road configuration and efforts to resolve this issue with both developers at the meeting on Monday. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the preliminary plat for Ridge Haven Addition. September 12, 1988 Mr. Tom Hedges, City Administrator City of Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55122 Re: Ridgehaven Acres Eagan, MN Dear Mr. Hedges: We are requesting that the preliminary plat of Ridgehaven Acres be scheduled on the upcoming September 19, 1988 City Council meeting. As you may remember, Ridgehaven Acres was before the City Council on May 16, 1988. The Council, at this meeting, referred this proposed single family development back to City staff and /or Planning Commission for their review of any Council proposed revisions to the preliminary plat. Specifically, the Council wanted to eliminate two proposed cul -de -sacs (one within Ridgehaven Acres) by means of a through street connecting Ridgehaven Acres to the previously approved Prettyman Heights development. It appeared that the Council thought that the developer of Prettyman Heights may revise his approved preliminary plat based on the proposed assessments that he would need to pay. The developer of Prettyman Heights has since petitioned the City to construct the extension of Sibley Hills Drive. The City Council, on June 7, 1988, ordered the feasibility report. A work order from the City was given to the engineering firm of OSM to proceed with the feasibility report on July 11, 1988. The public hearing concerning this street extension was be on the September 19, 1988 City Council meeting. However, the recommended assessments that City staff wishes to proposed to the Council have not been determined yet. City staff has mentioned that the developer of Prettyman Heights will not be making any revisions concerning the through street situation. It then appears that Ridgehaven Acres will not able to provide the though street that the Council wanted. The proposed preliminary plat of Ridgehaven Acres has not changed since the last time that the Council reviewed the development. Haven Enterprises, Inc., the developer of Ridgehaven Acres, has agreed to pay for the fair share of the proposed assessments concerning the extension of Sibley Hills Drive. The time that has elapsed since May has been to long and has delayed the approval of Ridgehaven Acres. This is of great concern to us because five of the fourteen lots have been sold contingent on plat approval. We would like to proceed with site grading as soon as possible after preliminary plat. House construction would comence once the final plat has been approved. The people that want to live within Ridgehaven Acres have made plans concerning selling their present homes. Because of the length of delay in the approval of Ridgehaven Acres these people may have to make other plans as to where they can build their new homes. We would appreciate any help that you can provide to help us through this platting approval process. If you have any questions, please call me at 534 -9629 (pager) or 933 -0562. Sincerely, Steve B. Ramsey, Presid- t HAVEN ENTERPRISES, INC. 14442 Excelsior Blvd. Minnetonka, MN 55345 SUBJECT: APPLICANT: LOCATION: CITY OF EAGAN PRELIMINARY PLAT VARIANCE (RIDGE HAVEN ADDITION) HAVEN ENTERPRISES SW 1/4 OF SECTION 4 EXISTING ZONING: R -1 (SINGLE - FAMILY) DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: APRIL 26, 1988 DATE OF REPORT: APRIL 14, 1988 REPORTED BY: PLANNING AND ENGINEERING DEPARTMENTS APPLICATION SUMMARY: An application has been submitted requesting a Preliminary Plat for the Ridge Haven Addition. This plat consists of fourteen single- family lots on 5.2 R -1 -zoned acres located along the south side of Sibley Hills Drive and east of Highway 13. EXISTING CONDITIONS /SITE PLAN: Currently there is an existing homesite on proposed. Lot 12 that will be removed. This "stovepipe " - shaped lot is now served by a long, shared driveway with an exception at the northwest portion of the site. The width at the proposed street right -of -way line is 20' and 50' is required. Either a Variance will be necessary or all of the lots will have to be shifted to the east. All other R -1 lot requirements have been satisfied. The lots vary in size from 12,000 SF to 18,600 SF (stovepipe lot). The gross density of the plat is 2.7 units per acre. Lots 1, 2, 3, 4, and 14 have double frontage on both Sibley Hills Drive and the internal street. Building setbacks of at least 30' will be required along both streets. Sibley Hills Drive will be upgraded to also serve the recently approved Prettyman Addition to the east. This site consists primarily of open grassland with scattered deciduous trees found around the existing home and perimeter property lines. Nearly all of the site will be graded to provide house pad locations. The land falls quickly from the east property line to a more gentle slope all the way to the western property line. GRADING /DRAINAGE /EROSION CONTROL: The proposed site has existing elevation differentials ranging from a high point of approximately 858 in the southeast corner of the site to a low of approximately 788 along the westerly side adjacent to Sibley Hills Drive. A cut area of approximately 20' is required in the southeast corner to achieve the proposed house pad elevation. The remaining portions of the site can achieve proposed house pad elevations with cut /fills of approximately 2' -5'. The grading plan proposes slope areas which exceed the maximum allowable 3:1 slope criteria. The development proposes to intercept site generated storm water runoff by the storm sewer system in the westerly cul -de -sac. The development does not adequately address the outlet to the proposed storm sewer system. The grading plan will need to be revised to properly identify side lot line drainage swales, especially on the proposed lots along the southerly and easterly sides. The development proposes to remove existing structures from proposed Lots 12 and 13. The existing well and septic system will have to be abandoned in accordance with Department of Health and Minnesota Pollution Control Agency standards. Storm water runoff from this site will be conveyed by a storm sewer system that outlets into the Minnesota River Valley flood plain. Erosion control measures which limit the amount of sediment movement into the storm sewer system and the Minnesota River are required. The following general criteria in the erosion and sediment _control plan need to be addressed prior to issuance of a grading permit or final plat approval: Establishment of vegetation, protection of adjacent properties, and identification of a contact person who will implement and maintain erosion control measures. UTILITIES: Water main service of sufficient capacity and pressure to serve the development is readily available from the existing water main in Sibley Hills Drive. The development will be required to extend the proposed 6" water main along Lots 3 and 4 to the northerly boundary of the development. This extension to the northerly property line will enable the development to adequately loop the proposed water main system when the existing water main in the northerly adjacent Sibley Hills Drive is extended easterly to serve the proposed Prettyman Heights Addition. Sanitary sewer service of sufficient depth is not readily available to serve the development. The development will need to tie into the existing MWCC trunk sanitary sewer line along the easterly side of T.H. 13. The development is required to provide a sanitary sewer and water main service stub to each of the proposed lots. STREETS /ACCESS /CIRCULATION: The development proposes to take street access from the northerly adjacent Sibley Hills Drive in one location. This access is then proposed to be extended ego southerly to a proposed east /west street which will have a cul- de -sac on each end. EASEMENTS /RIGHT -OF -WAY PERMITS: The development proposes to provide sufficient public right -of -way to adequately serve the development. No additional right -of -way for Sibley Hills Drive along the westerly and northerly sides of the development is required. The development will be required to provide appropriate utility easements for those public utilities constructed outside of the public right -of -way. All regulatory agency permits shall be acquired within the appropriate time frame as required by the affected agency. ASSESSMENTS: The following assessments are proposed as a condition of final plat approval in accordance with City Special Assessment Policies in effect at this time: PROJ # DESCRIPTION RATE QUANTITY AMT Storm Sewer Trunk $.056 /sf 187,569 $10,392 10 Lateral Benefit Trunk Sanitary Sewer 15.85/ff 259.87 4,119 TOTAL PROPOSED ASSESSMENT $14,511 All final assessment obligations will be calculated based on the quantities and dimensions of the final plat and in accordance with the rates in effect at the time of the final plat approval. RIDGE HAVEN ADDITION CONDITIONS: 1. These standard conditions of plat approval as adopted by Council action on September 15, 1987 shall be complied with: Al, Bl, B2, B3, Cl, C2, C3, C5, D1, El, F1, and Gl. 2. All lots shall be serviced and addressed from the internal street (cul -de- sacs). 3. The existing homesite and well /septic system shall be removed or abandoned to City requirements. 4.The development is required to remove the existing well and septic system in accordance with Department of Health and Polution Control Agency requirements. 5.Side lot line drainage swales are required to be defined on the grading plan. 6.An outlet to the proposed storm sewer system is required. 7.The development is required to extend its water main to the northerly property line for connection to the future easterly extended water main in Sibley Hills Drive,. 8.The development is required to execute the appropriate "waiver of assessment" for future street assessments associated with the easterly extension of Sibley Hills Drive. A. Assessments STANDARD CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL 1. This development shall accept its additional assessment obligations as defined in the staff's report in accordance with the final plat dimensions and the rates in effect at the time of final plat approval. B. Easements and Rights -of -Way 1. This development shall dedicate 10' drainage and utility easements centered over all common lot lines and adjacent to private property or public right -of -way. 2. This development shall dedicate, provide, or financially guarantee its proportionate share of the acquisition costs of additional drainage, ponding, and utility easements as required by the alignment,• depth, and storage capacity of all required public utilities and streets located beyond the boundaries of this plat or outside of dedicated public right -of -way as necessary to service this development. 3. This development shall dedicate all public right -of -way and temporary slope easements for ultimate development of adjacent roadways as required by the appropriate jurisdictional agency. 4. This development shall dedicate adequate drainage and ponding easements to incorporate the required high water elevation necessitated by City storm water storage volume requirements. C. Plans and Specifications 1. All public streets and utilities necessary to provide service to this development shall be designed by a registered professional engineer in accordance with City codes and engineering standards and policies, and approved by staff prior to final plat approval. 2. A detailed grading, drainage, erosion, and sediment control plan must be prepared in accordance with current City standards and approved by staff prior to final plat approval. 3. This development shall insure that all temporary dead end public streets shall have a cul -de -sac constructed in accordance with City engineering standards. 4. A detailed landscape plan shall be submitted on the proposed grading plan and approved by staff prior to the final plat approval. The financial guarantee shall be included in the Development Contract and not released until one year after the date of installation. l�3 STANDARD CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL PAGE TWO 5. All internal public and private streets shall be constructed within the required right -of -way in accordance with City design standards. D. Public Improvements 1. If any public improvements are to be installed under a City contract, the appropriate project must be approved by Council action prior to final plat approval. E. Permits 1. This development shall be responsible for the acquisition of all regulatory agency permits in the time f=ame required by the affected agency. F. Parks Dedication 1. This development shall fulfull its parks dedication requirements as recommended by the Advisory Parks and Recreation Commission and approved by Council action. G. Other 1. All standard platting and zoning conditions shall be adhered to unless specifically granted a variance by Council action. Advisory Planning Commission City Council Approved: August 25, 1987 September 15, 1987 Revised: LTS *2 STANDARD ! MENDOT r.i. ,..f.,,4" ril ...---.- s, An . 4. 7 ; LOST 51.(JR / ii COUN TR r i ' I; A 12 ,155011•1 E 11 „...f...“..1._— IL;q ; • I/ CL US . at -- t. - reiirwr - -r- " I rs-%' • . • . • 1,4q1OC ••i, „....,,, ._,... L. , - ,;.\ , ,, ..,_ . Y''''Vl. II .. ,., , 1 • ;250 \ / ..... „ f, '.2-- ' -- • ''- 7 - ,T;er -' 1 . ? : — -;" 2. "' :; ;;4, . . .;, , . . . . . . : -.'" -. . - ;_— . ; ... H. . . . . . . ; . . - - - . - _±:., , . . t ; ; ;., ;-,-,_; , • . .t: 1 Y ,>. ..ei 4 r / 7..,.+3 __,,,,"-,...--' ;11 '-,-;'..--.----,C:_':'f;!,__.,'__. X'ici;' 4 . ' \ ' ; .; I Z. / 1 _. : t ,c,,,,, ■ ;;T :x. . . : Tr: .. 2. . 2 c: : , . .; . ., ,.. I.:: : 7 : : 1 1 1 1 :L1-14 - 1 f 4 /415.54% S 1 . / T i.' K ..1,, ; ; A : :,. ;; \ ,•,._ , _ .. ..., ,/ r 5 ;; :',/ / ;;;. 7 ,.." ;,-;----''---) i '-- / .' it .0 ■-• "i .1';• / / A.7 •'"?_,:; -7 ..t) 5 5 .5 ....... 4 ' i • , " OUARP11 1,4Roc I 3. ; J ;; ; ' I i .1 fl I I ' • ' EA4A141:1 LiI I( Of NICE CTR. • y . 11/4 00. 1 • ;:e% • '7' • '--0 •"'I' • ,,,,,,,,, .1 1 '1 [4:441 R-4 ;COACH...Am :c PF • ACRES . PF PO 74-3 ekb., COUNTRY! ,R3 I •■;1 1,% % ..1,1 , 5 111 a ... A P 9-5-4 s\ VAY 9. R-1 -3 • i• f •, L : L • „,1— -‘• .c. •L FLARL DEA R-3 s • 7-ICSY MO A R-1 van TREFFLa ACRES r • ;OM rrrfltrt 0 ag f t I ') :rtn --- • AE I 1 + 4.- 4 , • � G? C Z M' i ,.-- .- .+..r ”, Q 4 ' ' i u Lin'' �� \� 1, u J1 J X R1OGENAW vi` 111 1 ? 1s. 1 .• 111 ' i1 i \ t 1,,1111 1 ,s cu t M it ,IOt t , '1111 ttl ittlf � * 1;r. , _ �� t � i tlt lit °1 � 1 ?t� • ; t; S 1 1,1 sE 1 a f4 ' t' + �� • s ��� 1�r�1tt11tlit� k 11l a tl . 1 �1. 1 1 1 1 11 ltd ,..■ -- , t — V « y t z 0 LS ;,. ti .•` 1 fz t 'ttrit artlettar aSSOC13tE tnc. MOW 0 m Z.0 ••■•■••• •. ... ,••■••111./INI. --- 0 0 , e''''' ' j? 5, Z • -- -'''''.<",7:-At''..----■S3i,„-',. e.- ;5 i lzro•0"- /..,,,, - ■ __ - -.: . ` s-- _:•_ - ,,, ' ( 74,1 -- -- -- :,.. --- - -. :7-- - -: -.-4- -• `N \- - `--.."N -•''',,..,,,,.... , • -I- ' - i/ 1. z '-.. z 1 Z :-.:: . •".. ? ' , - - - - 4:::7::*:-:4... ' ‘-1..s '-2:. •-•:.• __■,.'-'*--,-,.....::: . ,;,;;ItlIlt".° ( 4• ••• ''''' ' r , 7 -_ ---'---,' ,it .. ___:_-.- • ---- "r4:. -1- :: - ..7x.:-:. , ::: -. 4 4 ' . ...' , :':•- , -->. -,,,. j ___1. ! ; 2 , -,•. & .,- ; 4 q - . ; '-'",T.'k:;.*::,..e;;:■*,.4.j.;;;;:-.-%:;‘,,_ !,'"7,;1 '.■• - - - . 1 • A dltf.;%:"&it` 5 .:: . . c :A.: :: . : -C. '..'`..:"•/- --,' - .:;..-:. - - :•••:-:-..,,,?:_ ,. , , -(-) e-..- -:-.7- ...-:•-:. --,-. . ___ - ---44::'-'.*• - •!:-7!t■:crenW. : C,•>!„1 - L i i , ..-.....4 .. 7 ....:.._, .• " • -:.•„..: %; i — n =,--` t 4;;_ o 4 0, ,, : ,,.. ;L ...... . • • 4% : ---,': I I ( I :•-•,•• • ..."-!-":4•*}.C.....:. ..•.,-. V,Y 4; i ---'-`••••.,...,........„ i 1.;.: --•-o. \,: r. ' . 1:•:-.•-•-';'''''''w-N.-.-"-.'. •,... _•-• - - -.-1... : • : • : : ,,,.,. •; _ , ,••:: : C;':•:::-:•::•: ...... & I i 4 ,_,, , ,t , •, :,,, . . , .,.., ' . /.. • . 1: .1,.:4 4 .c. : :::::::: ....! r .; i.. ..t;;,. .. , : :,. .:s. : ; :; : - •1 ,, * F ' . a '''.1".•1:1§•'..`..:(:5-54:? ''t•,%\ " ■ ".........? ..",..44....: . .. ,..,``,-: -iff:! l L I- .?. - .....n: - .5 ,- 1:: : :1;.: 1 2:;Iii!r,7,-., 3 ---::,...,::::;*;:.....:1'...:4::z:-:::::::3-- I; ..1 '•^3 --.: • -,..._•.-2/... - ,:‘:-.::.:.:,...::•:N_.__._,.. v i 6 - --'-- t:•-•,. . ..*::V , :1\ '..4:---- : ;:z . ..--• ---- - • • ., ..Y. •;;;-6: , . .... - . -,, :5.- ,.. Ti..—%)÷-,.•;:•;;-:4:•:•r-xi;i-W::.;;_-/•.:: ......" • i • tti 75 ... - - ....N.: ...:.:F • ....• ;;;;;;;44; !:•:.:: N 6 ;,,L1..1.1.1.!:7.41.sse.:.:..,...,,sii:...::::: ./..,,,;::::77isit::::1!:.....!„:5,,,T,I,....:\.e..):::,.....th.,1.:S,,-;;*;::::::::775..)..".:::::ii::."1:..:• . \\ It 2 i5 ; t 71 0 1 --• ' . . 1 .41 , •4e 31•13 1 .. , _.,:_.....z,„. *x.c•••:•:• , :. m. :::_ : ::/.. , 14: . : ,.. ..1‘t"-/ - .- '-' ''''":''''''-''‘A°4;Zr'....54-1;.5. ..::,.;,";•,:,..,;..?..\:;),-,...:.:.: - _ - • / • .." -1.-,-)......_,.,..?..r 1 - . -...- 4 {%::•:.i s.li , *i --t . ..,., ,-.. - ,,::: .: 4-,..... l 4 .•'.. ..n.:•..-.. .•:•••.:, . , . .,.....,,,,4. X %. 1 ?4• .‘,..: `; - :;,i_ •••• , ...._____ ,...:, ...;...( :'.:...- - .: 0 - :•':: ._ . \•,\.,:.)..... 1 ..... A l .•_ • '*•-• ' - -. ' • , ' r .. "•\, --\,' 11 .... ' • . . . , ••• d.c1. SEf10510N PLAT. GRA0114q UT1L RIDGEHAVEN VI • i II 1 ; ii If; pi ; !: !..; N.; : 11).' l'i If; : I. - i ite tiff ,-I 1 1 1 I ., ii1 iiiii;Plii:i 4 *1 VI I cr 1 . 1 '1: 1111 p, !,1 • ; al l Tit , 1 ' li, ' ': iy, , , ,,-; v 111 1 i i 110 0011 01" ' • 1 i iii I, il!::1 I ! lir:1' i' II l I i ; it 0; ;! qiii it II .i il II i il 1, Nnii oi;. cur , 1 ,, 01 ji i• 0 i i si i 1 i 1 1 • viz 3 - ••: i: . 1 t r v • di I : I I I i • I 1 II il it ill 11: i 1 1 ; I I L O ; II i 1: 4; j 1 ,11. I i . V,T, itrr i ! I li 1 !I ill I: •.: !il 1 11 I i " : t 1 iii111 . • 1 I t iitt(if!,1 • .•,•; , .. , .. • 1 1111 j, • I .••• • 2 0 L W .• • 1 Y Lu4 • .r../ 18 1 A- - non (Ironer Th = associates, inc. e...11100. LA. lionwarq ~MOM MOM "'",Z =MO v\1 -G • m m r .rn r Tn m -n —i -4 -n • ;. • J R1DGEHAVEN — X - _ h`n. S",.. I___.. am. ►� 1 •'\ , ` 'rte.- = I � V- ; • f l l :[ 1•jiS �d ; r� 111 it . 1 �t [ =111 pill= t 1 � is iY .. �- i, � S gr i( , �t'I1littii: I '- tt' '• f i'1' : 1 '•i ; 1 ; t , • -; t !;! tt � ( i l .�: � ; l , i i + 1 � = 51 :���c• ; S� ! 1 1 ; l S it 1 , . • � ;t i !' r 1 ij ' i i ± t1 �f t :it ,l 3 t i ii n1 1' i t I11 i t . it z:=j it, 1 t it': i 1 1 71111 g;•t 1111!111:117i211 if'`i ' i 11 Il, •i t, 1 4 i!i 1 lit 1 i !i l,li: 11 ,i 1. it 1i 1 1 i Iii f t 1 : 401 [liiiilgt 1 • 1 1 1 ti it ( il i it 1 , 1 1 II. 'tip. iiitt .t,“„,.• . 1 n 11 i i i f f Iii i i 11 . i f • 1[� 0 �. t t >c ,Y••f� "ti 11t + 1 �� w �� 4 Ft nol s `t ' \ ----"irT's.- ' ......! 0 ' 1 , 0 . . I r;r. it 0 1—_, 1 _ ,,,,,t . ' ---- H :1411 i.i. ;I:. --;7: 7 1 ".j. -1 ; : ' ' ti _ z / ►inn 31118118r r associates, ine. TIMM 2 ^ - • Jj 1 , 1 iNi CLUB i '‘,\ N . LAKE ... 1 - - A./ N., (1±0 , ........ 41. LOST SPUR ,./ ■. I ■ ›. :CUNTRY ( - C Lb e, , , r _ _II IN %.1 ,77---7- , 1 ! v "I- r osT No 3 ...... •■••■ •■•••• ■NIMII ••11■11• OIMIOM •1.11M0 • .1■Mi _ .;..... --, , ' e I. . II H GH I VIEW ACRES . I c6t-li I 1 P t,•,Li ' r" -- 17 , 4,, - 1 ,._.------ • ! - I ,, ‘17 ' ‘ ."''''1:.:.'r -/->.` 1, Ho'Nfe ,IN__7- - • . , f - , 1 TREFFL ACRES ••••"! r""! '''', I ■ 1 : I i j . ■ ' Ily--3 i I , IIMIMM /1=0■111. ••■■■•-• - 11 • I •Z"' S HOC) II , FILO ; - - l< .3 6 ••• • r — - --••••••■••• • 1 oar. =woo ••■••• .1••■• ■••••■• • 7 ammo *ammo. ••••••0 ) 0 '. eil 1 ... li t I , . 1_ '; T■ii ) • A 1:1.... - h 1 J.- H gt. 1 N - 8 1 II d' ..% — z — ' 2- - 7 . I SUBJECT PARCEL city of eagan PUBLIC 1L,k WORKS DE PARTMEN S&NITARY SEWER MASTER PLAN approved : • 1 IMM■ FIG -#2 standard plate - t •••■••■ -tmot■••■••■ Ammul - - • missmin " • - So" • 72! H-d ;-,:()ST No 3 – - r 't 1 i — , --r - " — i ! 7 •-•—• L. ..-.-- . • f. I ' '' L LE' : ' ' '' 11 '•{' Gri VEY: • ....., ii i -r1::11 — ---1 --; RES ' ;---1 1 1 _ _ 15 Jr- ■- ..— .-• ..' " , ■ E. ,...„-- - F, .............;H- 86 8.0 • 6 ,•-,OF , 4 __ L_JI L \\ N 4167. N;13 _ _ 4., 5 -::-. ) ZEF-.NLER DP-1 • • •••, 8 5 9.3 . _.-- 6-I 866.0 . 1. L.' -- ,—,-.L—:—',– --- 7 — .7 L.}-d ' • ' t " : : . `, • ' ' r - - . 1 74. f; A .._;:,__ - j r ----17 --- - Trze NI t -‘ • • :__... L_! . : R ;8 8 i. L ,s, ••e: f t / 1 `-• - - ...: (.., . . - ----- . . - - - ' ‘-----." 2 4 I ...........- .......:i ,..... ..m.„ L if.3 1 7.2 ..0 ,t= , r ---- 7 - 17 - 7 - I CP- 4 !./-".::":; — 8 8 4 2 2 77 . 7 67.-:.%....L.L.. '.. Z4 • J L .%■-=----UD!';) I 1 C AKS 1 — ! g A LOST SFUR .". COUNTRY / H - c CLUB H- b city of eagan „6 - PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMEN STORM SEWER MASTER PLAN HP ' 843.5 -- 856.0 r — • I • • I I . SUBJECT PARCEL FIG *H approved: standard plate ;F: Agenda Information Memo September 19, 1988, City Council Meeting SUBDIVISION REGULATION ORDINANCE AMENDMENT TO SECTION 13.30 I. Ordinance Amendment, City of Eagan to Amend Chapter 13 of the Eagan City Code by Amending the Development Standards and Submission Requirements - -At a May City Council meeting, a subdivision regulation ordinance was given review. It was the decision of the City Council to send this proposed ordinance amendment to the Developers Task Force for their review and consideration. Both the Developers Task Force and Advisory Planning Commission have reviewed the propos d amendment and the document enclosed on pages through propos is a final draft for consideration by the Cit ouncil. The changes have been minor and do not affect the intent of a three step process and the objectives that were desired by the City Council. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To ratify the ordinance amendment amending Chapter 13 of the Eagan City Code by changing development standards and submission requirements. n• CITY OF EAGAN SUBDIVISION REGULATION ORDINANCE PROPOSED REVISION TO CITY CODE SECTION 13.30 DATA AND DESIGN STANDARDS Section 13.30 Subdivision 2 Sub. 2. Preliminary Plat. A preliminary plat shall contain the following: A. Indentification and Description 1. Proposed name of subdivision, which name shall not duplicate or be similar to the name of any other plat. The use of the word "estate" shall only be permitted if the property is zoned "Estate ". 2. Vicinity map as provided by the City illustrating general location. 3. Name, address and telephone number of Owner, Developer, Surveyor and /or Engineer and contact person, on the application. 4. North point (orient up). 5. Date of preparation. 6. Graphic scale of 1" = 50' or 100'. 7. Sheet size of 22" x 34" or 24" x 36 ". 8. Bench mark. 9. Certificate of boundary survey by a Land Surveryor or Engineer registered in Minnesota. 10. Legal description of boundary of proposed plat. B. Existing Condition on Proposed Subdivision 1. Boundary line of proposed subdivision clearly indicated. 2. Exceptions to the proposed subdivision. 3. Existing zoning. 4. Total acreage. 5. Location, widths and names of all existing or previously platted streets or other public way, showing type, width and also conditions of improvements. 6. All elevations, topography and vertical control data shall be tied to sea leavel datum, 1929 General Adjustments, including contours at vertical intervals of not more than two feet (2'). 7. General location of rock outcrops, power transmission lines and poles, tree massing and other significant fea- tures not listed shall be shown. 8. Location, dimensions and purpose of any existing public easements within the area to be subdivided, directly abutting or within one hundred feet (100'). Page 2 9. Grades, invert elevations and location of catch basins, manholes and hydrants of any utilities located upon or within one hundred feet (100') of the proposed subdivis- ion. 10. Location, dimensions, acreage and purpose of any existing publicly dedicated land surrounded by, directly abutting or within one hundred (100') of the proposed subdivision. 11. Location, type and dimension of any public trails or side- walks existing upon, abutting or within one hundred feet (100'). 12. Location, condition, purpose, disposition, address and floor elevations of any existing structures. 13. Tax parcel numbers for each unplatted property and platted property by name of plat, lot and block. 14. Location of existing ponds, wetlands, lakes, streams or marshes with data for normal water elevation, normal high water elevation, 100 year storm elevation, area of drain- age boundaries, and direction of flow. C. Existing Conditions on Adjacent Land 1. The following information shall be provided for a distance of one hundred feet (100') surrounding the boundary of the area to be subdivided. a) Zoning b) Tax parcel numbers for unplatted property c) Identification of platted property by names of plat, lots and blocks. d) Name of property owner(s) for current tax rec- ords except for platted single - family lots, shall be shown on the preliminary plat. e) Location, widths, surface type and names of all existing and or dedicated public streets. f) Section lines and corners. g) Ponds, wetlands, lakes, streams or marshes as required in Section 13.30, Sub 2, B 14. h) Public lands as required by Section 13.30, Sub 2, B 10. i) Topographic data, including contours as required in Section 13.30, Sub 2, B 6. j) Existing structures as required in Section 13.30, Sub 2, B 12. k) Utility .information as required in Section 13.30, ,,Sub 2, B 9. \ 3 ti 1 D. Design Features of Proposed Subdivision Page 3 1. Proposed zoning if different from existing zoning. 2. Tract boundary lines, right -of -way lines of streets, ease- ments and other rights -of -way and property lines of lots and other sites. Location, dimension and purposes of any easements. 3. An identification system for all lots and blocks. 4. Minimum front building setback line on all lots and other sites with the width of lot shown at the minimum front setback line. This may be shown by typical detail for single family development. 5. Proposed contours at 2' intervals to mean sea level datum (solid lines) to match existing contours. 6. Public streets showing right -of -way widths, paved street widths and paved radii. 7. Public street names consistent with existing street names in City or proposed names shall be shown in alpha designa- tion until approved by the City's Community Development Department.. 8. Lot data showing largest lot, smallest lot, average lot and medium lot as categorized by zoning district (use). 9. Location, type and size of parkland proposed to be dedi- cated for public use. 10. Provide acreage analysis of proposed parkland dedication as related to applicable Parkland Dedication Policy and Ordinances of the City. 11. Indentify any areas where finished grades will exceed 12% slope. 12. Identify any area where existing water or elevations as required by Section 13.30, Sub 2, B 14, will be altered. 13. Affidavid of Comprehensive Plan review shall be provided by owner /developer petitioning for approval of the pre- liminary plat. E. Techinical Design Features of Proposed Subdivision After the proposed preliminary plat has been conditionally ap- proved by the City Council, the following technical information shall be submitted for approval by the City Engineering and City Planning Departments. Said approval shall be required before the preliminary plat is deemed complete for purposes of accept- ing an application for a final plat by the City. 1. Location, and condition (active or abandoned) of any exist- ing water wells and /or septic systems. 2. Proposed private water well and /or septic system locations with sufficient soil and percolation data for analysis of suitability by City Engineer. Page 4 3. Location and finish floor elevations of any existing structures to remain after property is platted. 4. Finish floor elevations of proposed structure(s) on each proposed lot. 5. Utility plans showing size of utility line, invert and top of casting elevations, direction of flow arrows, hydrants and gate valves and service locations. 6. Public street grades with centerline elevations and per- cent of grade every 100'. 7. Projected traffic information as may be required for internal or abutting streets related to average daily trips (ADT) and A.M. and P.M. peak hour for purposes of traffic analysis and a determination of threshold levels that may require preparation of an Environmental Assess- ment Worksheet (EAW). 8. Limits of clearing and grading. 9. Location of areas to be seeded or sodded. 10. Location, type, size, root type, quantities and species of plant material to be planted as part of the platting and corresponding improvement process. 11. Location, type, grade and proposed improvements of public or private trails. 12. Detail improvements within parkland dedication area, i.e. utilities, grading, restoration. 13. Provide an applicable structural erosion /sediment control location (hay bale, silt fence, sedimentation basin). 14. A letter shall accompany submittal of the preliminary plat stating person /company responsible for erosion and sediment control plan preparation, implementation and maintenance. \,°\,S Agenda Information Memo September 19, 1988, City Council Meeting UPDATE /COMPREHENSIVE GUIDE PLAN J. Update, Comprehensive Guide Plan for the City of Eagan - -The City Council and Planning Commission have completed an update of the Comprehensive Guide Plan, a process that began in December of 1985 and was completed when an amendment was adopted January 27, 1987 by the APC. The amendment was submitted to the Metropolitan Council for their review. This item was reviewed by the Advisory Planning Commission at their August 30, 1988 meeting, however, no action was required. For a copy of the staff report prepared by the Planning Department that addresses the details of the Comprehensive Guide Plan amendment and, specifically, a recap of all the individual parcels requiring an amendment, refer to pages (9 77 through ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the adoption of the 1987 Comprehensive Guide Plan Update Amendment considering the revised commercial planned development text and the incorporation of seven processed Comprehensive Guide Plan amendments in the land use plan map. SUBJECT: COMPREHENSIVE GUIDE PLAN UPDATE APPLICANT: CITY OF EAGAN LOCATION: CITYWIDE DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: AUGUST 23, 1988 REPORTED BY: PLANNING DEPARTMENT APPLICATION SUMMARY CITY OF EAGAN The City is in the process of completing the January 1987 Comprehensive Land Use Guide Plan update and is requesting a final review of this document. BACKGROUND The Eagan Comprehensive Guide Plan was developed in 1980 and adopted by the City in 1983. This comprehensive plan is the City's policy statement concerning all aspects of land development and serves to guide the future development of Eagan. In view of Eagan's rapid population, housing and employment growth since the Plan's adoption, a review of the policy statements, goals and standards contained in the Plan was began in 1985. Nine joint City Council /Advisory Planning Commission meetings were held between December 1985 and December 1986 to obtain public comment regarding the Plan update. Based on information collected and comments received at these meetings, a Comprehensive Guide Plan amendment, dated January 1987, was produced. This amendment contains updated background land use data, reaffirmed goals and policies and a revised Land Use Plan map. The Advisory Planning Commission approved the update amendment on January 27, 1987 for transmittal to the City Council. The City Council reviewed the Advisory Planning Commission recommendations and forwarded the amendment to the Metropolitan Council for its review and comment prior to formal City Council action. The Metropolitan Council has completed its review of the amendment, and has provided its comments /requirements to the City for incorporation prior to formal adoption. PLANNING COMMENTS The Metropolitan Council has accepted the amendment text and land use map as submitted by the City Council in 1987, with one change regarding the Commercial Planned Development land use R"7 designation. A combination of commercial uses and intensities are expected to occur in a Commercial Planned Development area. Specific uses and intensities are determined by a Planned Development Agreement approved by the City Council. Given the flexible nature of Commercial Planned Development designations, the Metropolitan Council is concerned about its ability to analyze the impacts of development in these districts on metropolitan systems until a Planned Development Agreement with sufficient detail is approved. As such, additional language has been added to Section VI.D(2) of the amendment text which requires submission of Planned Development Agreements establishing land use type and intensity to the Metropolitan Council for review prior to development of a Commercial Planned Development area. The additional language is noted by a dotted line in the margin on the attached Comprehensive Guide Plan amendment document. All other text remains unchanged from that submitted by the City Council in 1987. In addition to the text change as required by the Metropolitan Council, all Comprehensive Guide Plan amendments recommended by the Advisory Planning Commission, adopted by the City Council and approved by the Metropolitan Council since submission of the January 1987 update amendment will be incorporated into the Land Use Plan map. As such, the map will be current as of the formal City Council adoption date. Seven minor amendments changing the Comprehensive Guide Plan land use designations have been processed since January 1987. The folowing list provides a recap of these amendments. APC CC PROJECT NAME /SIZE LAND USE CHANGE ACTION ACTION Community of Joy D -II to PF 1 -26 -88 2 -16 -88 Church 6 acres Blackhawk Pond D -III to D -I 1 -26 -88 3 -1 -88 37 acres Fire Station #5 D -III to PF 2 -25 -88 3 -1 -88 2 acres Thomas Lake Woods D -II to D -I 2 -25 -88 4 -5 -88 6 acres Country Hollow 2nd D -II & LB to D -I 2 -25 -88 . 4 -19 -88 13 acres Bridle Ridge 2nd D -II to D -I 3 -24 -88 4 -19 -88 167 acres Stratford Oaks D -II to D -III 3 -24 -88 4 -19 -88 40 acres ��g ACTION REQUESTED Action requested for this item is a recommendation to the City Council regarding adoption of the 1987 Comprehensive Guide Plan update amendment considering the revised Commercial Planned Development text and the incorporation of seven processed Comprehensive Guide Plan amendments in the Land Use Plan map. VV1 CITY OF EAGAN COMPREHENSIVE GUIDE PLAN AMENDMENT August 1988 Prepared by: Dale Runkle, Director City Planning Department and Urban Planning & Design, Inc. City Planning Consultant Page I. Introduction 1 II. Scope of Amendment 1 III. Goals and Policies 1 -4 IV. Survey and Analysis 4 -5 Table I 6 Table II 7 Table III 8 Table IV 9 V. Transportation 10 VI. Land Use Plan 10 -12 Summary 12 Land Use Plan Map 13 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Introduction CITY OF EAGAN COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT August 1988 The City of Eagan Comprehensive Guide Plan, prepared under the 1976 Metropolitan Land Planning Act, was adopted by the City of Eagan in 1983. The original plan was prepared in 1974. The latter document is often referred to as the "1980 Plan." This document is an amendment to the 1980 Plan. II. Scope of Amendment The preparation of this amendment began in 1985 and continued through 1986. The amendment is not considered to be a major revision of the Eagan Comprehensive Guide Plan; rather, it is considered to be a review and update. The process of preparing this amendment involved the following; a) A review and update of the Goals and Policies of the City. b) A Statistical update of population, housing, commercial and industrial development, zoning and similar hard facts. c) An analysis of commercial and industrial land use trends and growth potential. d) A dialogue with commercial and industrial developers /owners about proposed development. e) A review of Issues and Activities related to airplane noise generated from Minneapolis -St. Paul International Airport. f) A review of housing development trends by type, location and value. g) A series of joint monthly meetings involving staff, consul- tants, the Planning Commission and the City Council. h) A public hearing on December 9, 1986 and a second public hearing on August 23, 1988. III. Goals and Policies The Goals and Policies contained in Section II of the 1980 Compre- hensive Plan were reviewed. These Goals and Policies were reaffirmed with emphasis placed on certain goals as related below: A. General Goals The general pattern of development adopted to guide the City of Eagan cannot be described by any single term. Rather, the add pattern emphasizes development of employment centers and commercial goods and services within the community to serve the Eagan citizens. This self - sufficing development pattern was also emphasized in the 1974 Land Use Guide Plan. The employment centers are to be located primarily within town areas in the north - central and the north- western portions of the community. The commercial services are to be developed at numerous locations as complexes in order to be convenient to the citizens of the community. Additional attitudes toward the general pattern of development are described as follows: 1) Over - zoning for commercial and industrial development will be resisted and a special effort will be made to make zoning consistent with economic viability. To promote this goal, the City has a "Commercial Market Analysis" of the City prepared by Laventhol and Horwath in May 1988. 2) Special emphasis will be placed on beautification,and good appearance along major arterials leading to and through the city and potential adverse types of develop- ment such as "strip" commercial zoning will be resisted. 3) Eagan will attempt to develop as much of a self - reliant community as possible wherein employment, recreational services, commercial services and community facilities for most of the needs of the residents will be provided within the community. B. Environmental The city is concerned about the protection of the natural re- sources existing within the community in order that they may continue to enhance the living environment. It is a goal of the City of Eagan to maintain proper environmental controls in order that the urbanization process will provide for adequate protection of natural resources such as water bodies, water courses, wetlands, ground water recharge areas, erodible slopes, forest and wetlands, protection lands and similar nat- ural resources. C. Transportation One of the greatest problems that has faced the City of Eagan has been the development of an adequate transportation system in order to link this suburban area with other areas in the Metropolitan Area. Therefore, it has been a continued goal of Eagan to develop a safe and convenient transportation system in order to provide its citizens access to other portions of the Metropolitan Area. It is a further goal to protect the investment made in the Eagan Transportation System by controlling development and not permitting uses which would generate trips in excess of 903' Page 2 highway system capacity. To achieve this goal, the City of Eagan has funded the preparation of a computerized trans- portation study by Short Elliot Hendrickson, Inc. in 1988, which analyzed the current and projected system capacity and provided for in -depth analysis of development proposals and their impacts on the Eagan Transportation System. D. Housing Page 3 1) General - A primary goal of Eagan is to develop a well - balanced community with a diversity of housing in terms of both type and value. It is also a goal to cooperate in providing the city's "fair share" of housing to serve persons of low and moderate incomes. Thirdly, it is a goal to continue to carefully monitor the platting and development of residential areas in order to, achieve good planning to promote and preserve residential land values. 2) High Value Housing - In addition, the city has identified (1986) a deficiency in the number of high value resi- dential dwelling units that are being developed each year in order to achieve a balance in the type and value of housing units. It was determined that only about 10 dwelling units or less than 1% of the new housing starts are above $170,000 in value while some neighboring commu- nities average 70 to 100 units per year. It is a goal of the city to promote the development of 300 to 500 high value dwelling units (in excess of $150,000 value) during the next ten years. (1987 through 1996). In order to achieve this goal, the city is in the process of adopting the following policies: a) The city will identify those areas best suited to high value housing. b) The city will establish zoning standards that will protect and promote high value housing in certain areas. c) The city will attempt to provide financial incentives by reducing but not eliminating up -front development costs. d) The city will work with developers to modify engi- neering standards where possible to promote desired development. e) The city will actively promote high value development through a housing fair, mini- parade of homes, trade show or similar events. i E. Commercial and Industrial Development Page 4 3) Density of Residential Development - It has been a goal of the city to allow the developers reasonable flexibil- ity in determining suitable residential density since density is guided by several factors including market, terrain features, traffic, adjacent development, city services and similar influences. Therefore, the city has established density ranges in guiding the develop- ment of residential areas rather than specific densities. However, the City Council shall finally determine the appropriate density within the guided range when review- ing and approving specific developments. It is a goal of the City of Eagan to continue to promote the development of commercial and industrial complexes within the the city in order to provide a sound tax base, services for its citizens and employment opportunities. It is also a goal of the city to provide proper land use controls in order that this development will continue to enhance the appearance and property values within the community. Thirdly, it is a goal of the city to provide those services that are needed in order to support the commercial and industiral developments, such as public utilities, recreational facilites for employ- ees, transit service and thoroughfares. In order to achieve these goals related to commercial and industrial development, the following policies have been adopted: 1) The city has surveyed its economic potential generated by-the expenditures made by its citizens for certain goods and services. The City will pursue the development of a wide variety of services in order to provide com- mercial services within the city to serve its citizens. 2) The city will continue its efforts to relate zoning to the demonstrated potential for commercial and industrial development and not to over -zone areas beyond the real- istic potential that exists within the city. 3) The city will continue its efforts to carefully scruti- nize commercial and industrial developments in order that proper performance standards are achieved and in order that landscaping and the general appearance will enhance the property values of adjacent areas rather than become a distraction or detriment. 4) The city will continue to take and active role in promot- ing commercial and industrial development in the commu- nity. The elected officials of the city, city staff and civic organizations will make specific contact with de- velopers in order to promote commercial and industrial development in the city. ao 5 IV. Survey and Analysis Certain statistical information related to population, employment, housing, zoning, rate of development and land use designation was compiled during the preparation of this amendment. A. Population The following population estimates and projections were prepared by the city staff and planning consultant based upon city building permit records and development trends in October 1986. December 1986 estimate December 1992 projection December 2000 projection 39,000+ 50,000 60,000 Saturation 90,000 to 100,000 Page 5 B. Development - see attached Table I. C. Rate of Commercial and Industrial Development - see attached Table II. D. Land Use Designations - see attached Table III. E. Employment - see attached Table IV. DEVELOPMENT SUMMARY: CITY OF EAGAN SEPTEMBER, 1985 RESIDENTIAL 11,545 UNITS COMMERCIAL EXISTING SQUARE FEET Food: Grocery 40,000 Dairy Store 20,500 Food Service 74,200 Office: General 1,114,711 Medical 20,400 Financial 13,000 Shopping Centers: (excluding food) Centers under 50,000 square feet Centers over 50,000 square feet Clubs and Recreation: Auto service and motel TOTAL COMMERCIAL Location: Cedar Industrial Park Eagandale Industrial Park Sibley Terminal Industrial Park Other Industrial Areas TOTAL INDUSTRIAL a o� 169,000 197,000 280,800 429,750 3,363,535 332,100 1,520,740 5,646,125 1,993,211 SQ. FT. INDUSTRIAL EXISTING SQUARE FEET Page 6 TABLE II CURRENT RATE OF DEVELOPMENT -- Commercial and Industrial -- CITY OF EAGAN: SEPTEMBER 1985 November 1979 September 1985 Annual Rate COMMERCIAL 167 acres 285 acres 20 acres INDUSTRIAL 760 acres 1,037 acres 46 acres Total: 927 acres 1,322 acres 66 acres NOTE: At the current annual rate of development, an additional 990 acres (15years x 66 acres) of commercial and industrial land would be developed through the year 2000. Page 7 LAND USE DESIGNATION RESIDENTIAL: INDUSTRIAL: TABLE III CITY OF EAGAN LAND USE PLAN DESIGNATIONS - JANUARY 1987 CITY TOTAL D -I 5010 5705 D -II 4742 3273 D -III 1349 1027 D -IV 255 369 TOTAL 11,356 10,374 COMMERCIAL: LB 463 231 NB 107 85, GB 108 44 RE 76 32 CSC 302 185 RSC 0 0 (COMMERCIAL P.D.) CPD 645 1214 * TOTAL NOTE: TOTAL AMOUNT OF COMMERCIAL, INDUSTRIAL, AND RESIDENTIAL LAND HAS BEEN REDUCED FROM 1980 TO 1986 BY THE TAKING FOR FREEWAYS AND FOR THE USE OF PUBLIC FACILITIES AND PARKS. THESE FIGURES WERE CALCULATED WITH THE USE OF A PLANIMETER, AN ENGINEERING TOOL USED TO MEASURE AREA. * IN THE 1980 PLAN ONLY ONE AREA (LAUKKA -BECK) WAS SPECIFICALLY DESIGNATED "COMMERCIAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT" EVEN THOUGH CPD AGREEMENTS EXISTED IN OTHER AREAS. THE 1987 PLAN HAS A CPD DESIGNATION OVER TEN (10) AREAS; NINE (9) OF WHICH HAVE CPD AGREEMENTS AND THE OTHER (DODD ROAD /TH 55) HAS BEEN ZONED FOR "PLANNED DEVELOPMENT" SINCE 1976. 1980 PLAN 1987 PLAN 1,701 1,791 3,215 2,937 15,966 15,102 Page 8 0 O co CO 0. c) 0 tC) CO r CD C) w 0 0 0 V. Transportation The transportation section of the Eagan Comprehensive Guide Plan was not updated or revised as a part of this amendment process. There were not any major changes made in land use designations which could affect the transportation system of the city. However, as an outcome of the amendment process, the city determined that a major computerized traffic engineering study would be undertaken. This study will provide current information and provide the city a better means of analyzing development proposals. The city also has coordinated capital improvement programming for major throroughfares with Dakota County and MN DOT. VI. Land Use Plan A. Concept of the Land Use Plan The general concept under which the Eagan Land Use Guide Plan has been developed has not changed. In general, the pattern of development emphasizes a self- sufficing development pattern with large employment centers, commercial services at numerous locations and adequate community facilities. In addition, mixed residential development at generally low densities are proposed for most neighborhoods within the city. High densi- ties are only proposed at a few locations near other types of intense development. B. Agricultural No areas have been designated as being viable for long -term commercial agricultural use. The reasons for this are two- fold; first, Eagan is in a terminal moraine area and as such, most of the area is of an irregular terrain which is not well suited to agricultural use and secondly, Eagan is located in an area of rapid urbanization and the corresponding high land values and taxes (including utility assessments) do not make long -term agricultural use economically feasible. Portions of Eagan, however, have productive agricultural soils, and agricultural uses are expected to exist on these properties until the time for urbanization. C. Residential On the Land Use Plan map designations have been made for every area of the city. However, where possible, flexibiblity in terms of allowing the developer to determine the type of residential unit has continued to be a basic concept in pre- paring the amended plan. The plan utilizes a "Land Use Intensity" approch wherein density ranges are proposed for most residential areas within the community rather than a specific proposal for certain types of housing. For example, in the D -III areas a density range of 6 to 12 units per acre a << Page 10 Page 11 is proposed and it is expected that this could result in a mixture of single family homes, townhouses, quadrominiums and a low density type of apartments. Rather than project a specific mix or specific development plan for a given area, the Land Use Plan proposes a guide to density (units per acre). A determination of the specific mix and density, within the designated range, is made by the City Council when the property is rezoned or final plan approval is granted for a planned unit development. The City Council is not under any obligation to approve densities at the upper end of a range; rather, the City Council will determine the appropriate density and type of dwelling unit within the range. The density ranges as illustrated on the "Land Use Guide Plan" map for residential uses are: D -I Single family (0 -3 units per acre) - exc,lusively a single family area unless double bungalows or other low density units are specificaly approved by City Council as buffer areas. D -II Mixed Residential (0 -6 units per acre) - flexible with wide range of density and type of unit possible with final determination by City Council. D -III Mixed Residential (6 -12 units per acre) - similar to D -II except that area may be suited to higher density. D -IV. Multiple Residential (12 + units per acre) - flexible area expected to develop with high density develop- ments with final determination of density, type of unit and mix to be made by the City Council. This has been the approach to development in Eagan for the past several years and it has proven to be successful in most areas. This approach allows a developer flexibility and provides for a better reaction to the market place. It also provides the City Council with the authority to make a final determination of density and unit mix after all de- tailed information has been reviewed. D. Commercial and Industrial The concept of commercial and industrial development remains unchanged from the 1980 plan except for three designations. 1) Regional Shopping Center Designation First, while the RSC regional shopping center designation continues as a category, no area has been designated on the Land Use Plan map for this use. There was no specific area designated on the 1980 plan; however, an a 2) Commercial Planned Development • Page 12 area north of Lone Oak Road and east of Dodd Road was designated "Commercial Planned Development" and could have developed as a regional center. That area has since been approved for a specific planned development that does not contain a regional shopping center. As with the 1980 Plan, the city has retained the RSC designation but has not so designated any area. Ten parcels have been designated Commercial Planned De- velopment (CPD) on the February, 1987 Land Use Plan map. Nine of the CPD areas presently have approved planned development agreements with the city. The other area was zoned for commercial and industrial planned devel- opment in 1976. It is expected that an agreement will be adopted before this area (Dodd /T.H. 55) ,is developed. The CPD areas are expected to develop with a combination of commercial uses. The specific uses are determined by a "Planned Development Agreement" which is approved by the City Council for a specified number of years for each property. Those individual plans need to be reviewed in order for a citizen to determine the type of commercial uses permitted in each CPD. The Metropolitan Land Planning Act requires the Metro- politan Council to review comprehensive plans for con - 3 fortuity with metropolitan system plans. However, for 3 those areas the city has disignated CPD, insufficient information is available to complete this review until 3 a development agreement with sufficient detail is nego- tiated or an actual development proposal is made. In order to satisfy the system review requirements of the a Metropolitan Land Planning Act, all portions of a comm- a ercial planned development agreement that establish or 0 affect land use type and intensity are deemed to be a 3 part of the city's comprehensive plan and must be sub - 3 witted to the Metropolitan Council as a plan amendment pursuant to Minnesota Statutes 473.175. Any amendments 0 to the portions of a commercial planned development A agreement that establish or affect land use type or A intensity must similarly be submitted to the Metropolitan 3 Council as a comprehensive plan amendment. 3 For those commercial planned developments where a dev- 3 elopment agreement was executed prior to this comprehen- 3 sive plan amendment (approved September, 1988), the land 3 use component has not been incorporated into the compre- 3 hensive plan. In these instances, the portions of the final development plan that affect land use type and 3 intensity are hereby deemed to be an amendment to the 3 comprehensive plan and must be submittted to the Metro- : politan Council for review pursuant to Minnesota Statutes a�3 Summary 3) Freeway Development (F.D) Page 13 1 473.175. Similarly, any amendment to the final develop- ment plan must be submitted to the Metropolitan Council as a comprehensive plan amendment. 3 The Metropolitan Council has approved the CPD designation for the ten parcels on the Land Use Plan map subject to the condition that, before development can occur in these areas, the city will comply with the CPD review process described above. 1 ] The city will amend the City Zoning Code (Chapter 11) in order to incorporate the above provisions into the code. The City Council and Advisory Planning Commission have directed staff to prepare criteria that will be used in establishing a Freeway Development (F.D.) land use designation in the comprehensive plan. It is expected that this designation will be used at certain locations along freeways in order to promote quality development and protect freeway interchanges from traffic congestion. This amendment dated August 1988 constitutes a review and update of the 1980 Plan. Most of the changes made herein were an outgrowth of daily activity that has occurred over the past few years rather than a whole- sale review and revision of Eagan Comprehensive Guide Plan. Such a major review is expected every 10 years. a ( 4 MEMO TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIIMEMBERS FROM: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES DATE: SEPTEMBER 14, 1988 SUBJECT: INFORMATIVE FIRE DEPARTMENT MONTHLY UPDATE Enclosed on page Or? is a copy of the July monthly report for the Fire Department. AFFIRMATIVE ACTION POLICY Administrative Assistant Duffy has prepared a draft affirmative action plan for Administrative and City Council review. The management team will review this proposed policy at their next meeting on Monday, September 19, and it is suggested that the Personnel Committee receive a copy and be given a presentation on this document. Eventually, action is required by the City Council with submission to the State prior to November 1 of this year. ASSISTED HOUSING UPDATE Enclosed on pages c,)1$ throu OL7 is the most recent copy of the status report for assisted housing and community development as prepared by the Dakota County HRA. The second page of the enclosure relates specifically to Eagan. PROTECTIVE INSPECTIONS MONTHLY REPORT Enclosed on pages through l is a copy of the monthly report for August, 1988. The last page of that report compares August, 1987 permits to date. Though the total number of building permits is down approximately 40, the number of single family permits has increased by 9 compared to August of 1987. CLIFF LAKE CENTRE TREES UPDATE Enclosed on pages through / is a copy of a letter that was sent to Mayor El ison and City Councilmember Wachter that explains the status of trees at the Cliff Lake Centre project. OFFICIAL STATEMENT A copy of the official statement for the September 19 bond sale is enclosed without page number for your review. The official statement is prepared by Springsted with the date of collection and assistance of the Director of Finance and City Administrator. METROPOLITAN WASTE CONTROL COMMISSION PAMPHLET Enclosed for each member of the City Council is a copy of information provided by the MWCC regarding their proposed project. This information is well in advance of the November 1 meeting. I thought each Councilmember would appreciate an opportunity to review the data at their leisure. COMPREHENSIVE WATER & SEWER SYSTEMS /EXECUTIVE SUMMARY City Administrator Enclosed on pages through 2E:5(are executive summaries of the revised and updated Comprehensive Master Plans for the City's Water and Sewer Systems that were distributed to the Council under separate cover with the September 6th packet. It is anticipated that staff will be requesting formal Council adoption of these Comprehensive Master Plan updates at the October 6th meeting for incorporation in future design and scheduling perimeters for the future development of the City of Eagan. /S/ Thomas L. Hedges MANPOWER Available Nights Available Days Available Days & Nights Available Rotating On Leave Rookies EAGAN FIRE DEPARTMENT MONTHLY REPORT FOR July, 1988 TYPE WORK PERFORMED MAN HOURS Fire/Rescue 1,531 Training 729 Truck & Equipment Maint. 159 Station Maintenance 110 Fire Prevention 38 Administrative 370 TOTAL 2,937 TOTAL TOTAL STATION #1 STATION #2 STATION #3 15 13 19 6 8 4 4 4 4 3 1 3 0 1 0 0 0 0 28 27 30 FIRE/RESCUE TYPE NUMBER $ LOSS Structure 13 500 Grass 33 Vehicle 4 False 14 Medical 5 Other 8 77 500 LARGE DOLLAR LOSSES DATE NAME LOCATION OCCUPANCY $ LOSS NONE r1 F-Monthly-Report 11/87 ASSISTED HOUSING Section 8 Existing: Certificates Vouchers Moderate Rehab Section 8 New Construction Low Rent Housing 235 Home 236 Rental tt TOTAL ASSISTED HOUSING COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT * + = Increase /- = Decrease ** Status Report for Dakota County ** August, 1988 Amount of Elderly Family Total ( + / -)* 367 1,188 1,555 -4 86 213 299 +30 4 21 25 0 247 300 547 0 380 200 580 0 0 41 41 0 0 526 526 0 1,084 avg 2,489 3,573 +26 Amount Commercial / of Elderly Family Multifamily Total Increase MHFA Local Participation 0 3 0 3 0 MHFA Home Improvement Loan 33 171 0 204 1 MHFA Home Rehab Loan 65 76 0 141 2 MHFA Home Energy Loan 10 125 0 135 1 Rental Rehab 38 49 5 92 0 CDBG Rehab Loan 89 174 0 263 15 CDBG Rehab Loan - Mobile Home 1 20 0 21 0 MHFA Solar Bank Energy Loan 0 8 0 8 0 312 Loan - Residential 4 15 0 19 0 312 Loan - Commercial/ Mixed Use N/A N/A 3 3 0 Weatherization 361 1,443 0 1,804 13 TOTAL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 601 2,084 8 2,693 32 Numbers for the City of South St. Paul are included in Assisted Housing, Rental Rehab, and Weatherization, but are excluded from the rest of the Community Development programs; South St. Paul operates separate Community Development programs. Status Report for the City of Eagan August, 1988 Amount of ASSISTED HOUSING Elderly Family Total ( + / -)* Section 8 Existing: Certificates 32 234 266 -7 Vouchers 10 72 82 +8 Section 8 New Construction 0 33 33 0 Low Rent Housing 0 18 18 0 236 Rental 0 144 144 0 TOTAL ASSISTED HOUSING 42 501 543 +1 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT TOTAL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 12 * + = Increase /- = Decrease Amount of Elderly Family Total Increase MHFA Home Improvement Loan 2 13 15 0 MHFA Home Rehab Loan 3 3 6 0 MHFA Home Energy Loan 1 10 11 0 CDBG Rehab Loan 1 5 6 1 Weatherization 5 66 71 0 97 109 1 11 FOUNDATION 1 , $ $ 15.00 1$ $ 15.5C 481 SINGLE FAMILY ' 65 i 7,281,000 39,438.00 19,719.00 179,541.00 26 DUPLEX 2 i 123,000 840.00 420.00 4,915.5C 34 TOWNHOUSE 0 i 4 11 CONDO 0 1 0 APT BLDGS 0 0 AGRICULTURAL 0 I 18 COMMERCIAL 5 I 3,600,000 12,128.00 6,064.00 101,592.0C 54 COMMIIND REMODEL 10 586,500 3,298.00 1,146.00 6,451.0( COMM /IND ADDITION 0 2 INDUSTRIAL 0 0 INSTITUTIONAL 0 6 PUBLIC FACILITIES 0 RES. GARAGES 1 6,000 74.00 - -- 77.0C 44 RES. ADDITIONS 3 51,500 470.00 149.00 645.0C 32 SWIM POOL 5 47,000 514.00 122.00 660.0C 254 MISCELLANEOUS 31 61,900 1,022.00 73.00 1,130.0C 1 DEMOLISH 0 2 HOUSE MOVES 0 981 MO. TOTALS 123 11,756,900 57,799.00 27,693.00 295,027.0C -1 ADJUSTMENTS 0 980 YEAR - TO - DATE 80,245,436 405,393.00 193,724.50 1,936,935.10 YTD 1 NUMBER OF PERMITS ISSUED PROTECTIVE INSPECTIONS MONTHLY REPORT - AUGUST 1988 Electrical Plumbing HVAC Water Softener Signs Well, Cesspool, Septic Tank MONTHLY THIS MONTH 204 85 665 137 7 16 3 NATURE OF BUILDING PERMITS ISSUED PERMIT FEE YEAR - TO - DATE 1,169 925 74 107 8 (PLAN REV FEE TOTAL FEES TYPE MO. # OF PERMITS MO. # OF BUILDINGS YTD # OF BUILDINGS MO. # OF UNITS YTD. # OF UNITS # OF PERMITS VOIDED # OF UNITS MOVED IN1 DUPLEX 2 1 13 2 26 3 -PLEX 1 3 4 -PL.EX i 10 40 5 -PLEX 6 -PL 2 12 7 -PI,EX 8 -PLEX 10 -PLEX I, P 12 -PLEX 16 -PLEX APT. BLDG. OTHER 1 1 TOTAL,: 2 1 26 1 2 81 PROTECTIVE INSPECTIONS - MONTHLY REPORT DATE AUGUST 1988 MULTI - FAMILY BREAKDOWN ,91 PROTECTIVE INSPECTIONS MONTHLY REPORT COMMERCIAL /INDUSTRIAL 8r INSTITUTIONAL BREAKDOWNS DATE AUGUST 1988 BLDG. 1 1 1 1 PERMIT # 1 ADDRESS & LEGAL 1 OWNER 1 VALUATION 1 OCCUP. 1 1060 LONE OAK RD 1 1 1 15417 1 L 6 -9, B5, EAG IND PK 3 1 OPUS CORP 1$1,340,000 'COMM NEW 1 1274 TOWN CENTRE DR 1 1 1 15438 L2, B1, TOWN CTR 100 6TH 'FEDERAL LAND 1 800,000 ICOMM NEW. 1 3420 -3450 DENMARK AVE 1 1 1 15437 1 L 1, B1, TOWN CTR 100 6TH 1 " II 700,000 1 " 1262 -1272 TOWN CENTRE DR 1 1 1 15510 1 L3, B1, TOWN CTR 6TH 11 11 440,000 11 15450 1 1250 LONE OAK RD LONE OAK PLAZA 1 320,000 1 it 1, 1 L 1, B 1, EAG LEMAY LK 3RDI LTD. PARTNERSHIP' 1 1 1030 LONE OAK RD 1 1 1 15520 OPUS CORP 1 201 000 INT. IMPR. 1 L 10 -13, B5, EAG CTR IND # ' 15428 1 2950 LONE OAK CIR 1 1 1 L4, BO, EAG CTR IND PK 2 • ROADWAY EXPRESS 164,000 INT. IMPR. 1 2020 SILVER BELL RD 1 1 1 15439 1 L1, B1, DAL DEVEL 1DALLAS DEVEL CO 1 110,000 INT. IMPR. 15471 1 4888 PILOT KNOB RD 'CHAPEL HILLS 1 1 1 L1, B1, CHAPEL HILLS BAP.CH BAPTIST CHURCH 1 42,00 1 INT. IMPR. 1 1565 CLIFF RD 1 15503 1 L1, B1, THOM LK CTR l EAGAN CTR ASSOC 1 38,000 1 INT. IMPR. 1 3670 DODD RD 1 1 16,000 1 INT. IMPR. 15519 1 L2, B1, YORKTON IND PK S 1 GREENSBROUGH ASSOC, 15533 1200 YANKEE DOODLE RD 1 EAGAN TOWER OFC 1 1 1 L1, B1, TOWN CTR 100 1ST 'BLDG PARTNERSHIP 1 6,000 1 INT. IMPR. 1 1 1 1 15449 1 II FEDERAL LAND CO 1 5,000 1 INT. IMPR. 15470 1 4206 NICOLS RD 1 1 1 L191, B8, CED GROVE 2ND •TOTAL PETROLEUM 1 3,000 1 INT. IMPR. 3584 KENNEBEC DR LARRY WENZEL 1 1,500 1 INT. IMPR. 15511 1 L1, B30, SECT 17 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 NUMBER OF PERMITS ISSUED Plumbing HVAC Water Softener Signs Well, Cesspool, Septic Tank PROTECTIVE INSPECTIONS MONTHLY REPORT - Electrical 164 1,367 THIS MONTH YEAR -TO -DATE 85 811 135 1,005 43 7 0 NATURE OF BUILDING PERMITS ISSUED AUGUST 1987 120 88 7 TYPE NO. VALUATION PERMIT FEE PLAN REV FEE TOTAL FEES 13 FOUNDATION 3 $ $ 45.00 $ $ 45.00 472 SINGLE FAMILY 49 4,659,000 23,602.00 11,820.00 121,150.00 42 DUPLEX 2 110,000 692.00 346.00 4,497.00 88 TOWNHOUSE 4 307,000 1,688.50 844.25 9,495.25 3 CONDO 0 8 APT BLDGS 4 1,954,000 6,676.00 3,338.00 115,631.00 0 AGRICULTURAL 25 COMMERCIAL 1 770,000 2,446.00 1,223.00 10,280.00 79 COMM /IND REMODEL 8 185,500 1,385.70 638.30 2,117.00 6 COMMIIND ADDITION 2 5,022,000 12,256.00 6,128.00 58,741.00 0 INDUSTRIAL 0 INSTITUTIONAL 2 PUBLIC FACILITIES 1 530,000 1,786.00 893.00 10,630.00 32 RES. GARAGES 4 22,800 269.00 - -- 281.50 26 RES. ADDITIONS 2 43,000 342.60 171.30 536.40 16 SWIM POOL 2 20,000 187.00 - -- 197.00 211 MISCELLANEOUS 23 2,583,475 7,472.40 107.50 8 724.65 2 DEMOLISH 2 HOUSE MOVES (CHURCH; 1 30.00 30.00 —1 ADJUSTMENTS 1,021 TOT. 106 16,206,775 58,878.20 25,509.35 342,355.80 YEAR -TO -DATE 107,230,087 444,412.33 211,642.50 2,457,826.58 al NUMBER OF PERMITS ISSUED Plumbing HVAC Water Softener Signs Well, Cesspool, Septic Tank PROTECTIVE INSPECTIONS MONTHLY REPORT - Electrical 164 1,367 THIS MONTH YEAR -TO -DATE 85 811 135 1,005 43 7 0 NATURE OF BUILDING PERMITS ISSUED AUGUST 1987 120 88 7 September 8, 1988 The Honorable Mayor Vic Ellison Members of the City Council City of Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55122 RE: Cliff Lake Centre Trees Dear Mayor and Councilmembers: construction company OF MIN YANN TA 1 E80 NCOFi Pursuant to the request of the City Council, I have done further research into the removal of several trees Councilman Wachter asked about, most specifically several lying to the south and southeast of the Target store. In my questions to Westwood Engineering regarding the ability to save some of those trees, it was pointed out to me that: a. In one case there was contractor error and inadvertent contact; b. Two trees designated to be saved were damaged by footings and needed to be taken down; c. The topographical map that we used to design the tree saving plan was based on high and low points and specific on -site information on occasion was not totally accurate and the trees were not able to be saved because of this topographical difference; and d. Due to this site information, six trees were also saved that had not been designated to be saved. We feel that any tree loss is unfortunate, but we do feel that we saved many more trees than the skeptics had suggested and we will make every effort to continue to save these trees within our power. We realize that there still may be some loss due to environmental factors such as drought, root compaction, etc., and potentially even contractors accidents. However, now that the final grading is done the bulk of the risk of losing more trees other than environmentally is behind us and we hope to maintain all those now existing on the site. 700 INTERNATIONAL CENTRE, 900 SECOND AVENUE SOUTH, MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55402 TELEPHONE 612 /339 -9847 / FAX 612/337-5552 a- City of Eagan Page Two September 8, 1988 I have enclosed a summary for the reasons of the net loss of two trees sent to me by Westwood Engineering, the company who designed the tree saving plan. I have had Westwood prepare a map outlining those specific trees saved and those lost and would be happy to share this with you if you so desire. I can assure you that Ryan Construction has taken the saving of these mature trees very seriously and we are currently having them inspected (through Westwood) by experts to determine how they should be pruned and to determine how over time they can not only be saved but prosper to maintain some of the character of this special site. If I can be of further assistance, please let me know. Sincerely, Will am J. McHale Vice President WJM12 /65 ssi Enclosure cc: Ted Wachter (w /encl.) Chuck Poppler Jim Sturm Pat Hoffman September 9, 1988 WESTWOOD PROFESSIONAL SERVICES, INC. Mr. Bill McHale Ryan Construction Co. 900 2nd Ave. South Suite 700 Minneapolis, MN 55402 RE: Cliff Lake Centre Dear Bill: In response to your request, I am writing this letter in an attempt to delineate the events that lead to the loss of some trees at your Cliff Lake Centre Project. At the time the site plans went through the municipal review process we were repeatedly told that we wouldn't be able to save the Oak trees on site by various members of the City Council and staff. Our response was that it will be difficult but that we will make every reasonable effort within our power to save as many trees as practically possible. Much to everyone's disappointment some trees have been lost, although most appear to be surviving. Much of what has occurred was a result of a problem with the Topographic map used. This map indicated grades substantially different in some areas than actually existed on the project. The grade difference did force the removal of 8 trees that were planned to be saved, but the difference also allowed us to save 6 other trees that were not indicated on the plan to be saved. Enclosed for your information is a copy of the grading plan which indicates the location of the trees we intended to save. I have identified the 4 areas of tree loss as areas 1 thru 4 and will attempt to explain what happened in each area. Area 1 (1 tree lost) Very early in the grading operation, this tree was damaged to the point that we felt it would not survive, so a decision was made to remove it. Area 2 (2 trees lost) When this area was being graded for the placement of the retaining wall footing, we found that due to size of the footing required, and the necessary slope for safety purposes we would have cut deeply into the root system on these 2 trees. In our opinion they would not have survived so a decision was made to remove them. 8525 EDINBROOK CROSSING, BROOKLYN PARK, MINNESOTA 55443 (612) 4248862 (SuMness Office) 7415 WAYZATA BOULEVARD, ST. LOUIS PARK, MINNESOTA 55425 (612) 546 -0155 le e n Cliff Lake Centre Page 2 of 2 Area 3 (4 trees lost) In this area there was a significant difference in the topopgraphy. The actual field conditions suggested that the individualized wooden retaining walls were more risky, more expensive and very unattractive. In this situation the actual "lay of the land" and root pattern would have resulted in our fighting the natural conditions to force a solution. Area 4 (4 trees lost, 6 trees saved not previously labeled as "saved ") The loss of these 4 trees was the result of a difference in topo from our plan to what was actually existing and also the trees were closer to the curb line then we indicated on the plan. The trees were located beyond the curb but when the grade was cut for the curb the root system on these 4 trees was Beverly damaged and it was felt the trees were no longer well anchored against the wind and may not survive. We would like to point out that in this area, due to the elevation difference we were able to save 6 oak trees that had not been marked to be saved. In our opinion, the tree loss is very unfortunate but unavoidable. We believe that further tree loss may occur. We will remain vulnerable to environmental effects (drought, root compaction, etc.) and contractors accidents. Fortunately, the grading work is complete and that was the most threatening operation we envisioned. In closing we would like to point out that in the area around the Target site and the south by the tenant shops, we had indicated 52 trees to be saved (along the edge of the grading area, the Target parking lot and the area just north of Target). In this area 47 trees appear to be surviving. This translates to a 90% save ratio. We feel that due to the size and scope of this project, that this is a noteworthy accomplishment and it speaks favorably to our originally stated intent to save those trees. I hope this information is adequate for your needs, if not, please do not hesitate to call. Sincerely, WESTWOOD PROFESSIONAL SERVICES, INC. Charles R. Poppler, Project Manager CRP /ls Enclosure Bonestroo Rosene Anderlik & Associates Engineers & Architects September 15, 1988 Honorable Mayor and City Council City of Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55122 Re: 1988 Comprehensive Sewer Policy Plan City of Eagan File No. 49438 24 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Dear Mayor and Council: Otto G. Bonestroo, P.E. Robert W. Rosen, P.E. Joseph C. Anderlik, P.E. Bradford A. Lemberg, P.E. Richard E. Turner, P.E. James C. Olson, P.E. Glenn R. Cook, P.E. Thomas E. Noyes, P.E. Robert G Schunicht, P.E. Marvin L. Sorvala, P.E. Keith A. Gordon, P.E. Richard W. Foster, P.E. Donald C. Burgardt, P.E. Jerry A. Bourdon, P.E. Mark A. Hanson, P.E. Ted K. Field, P.E. Michael T. Rautmann, P.E. Robert R. Pfefferle, P.E. David O. Loskota, P.E. Thomas W. Peterson. P.E. Michael C. Lynch, P.E. James R. Maland, P.E. Kenneth P. Anderson, P.E. Keith A. Bachmann, P.E. Mark R. Rolfs, P.E. Robert C. Russek, A.I.A. Thomas E. Angus, P.E. Howard A. Sanford, P.E• The 1988 update of the Comprehensive Sewer Policy Plan provides a complete re- calculation of sanitary sewer trunk capacities and expected ultimate flows based on the most recent Land Use Guide Plan and current population esti- mates. It includes revised estimates of the cost to complete the trunk sani- tary sewer system and a review of existing on -site sewage disposal systems. Those major changes from the 1982 Comprehensive Sewer Policy Plan are sum- marized below: 1. Added additional subdistricts for clarity and greater detail. 2. Minor adjustments of the major boundary between North and Central Districts to better balance trunk capacities in the North District. 3. Recalculated subdistrict areas and estimated flows based on actual development and latest Land Use Data. 4. Provided population projections with both the City of Eagan and Metro Council projections. 5. Ultimate projected population reduced to 100,000 from 121,000. 6. Added a Summary of Conclusions (pg. 7 in Report) 7. Revised the trunk layout map to reflect the latest construction. Page 1. 2335 West Highway 36 • St. Paul, Minnesota 5511 612 - 636 -4600 Daniel J. Edgerton, P.E. Mark A. Seip, P.E. Philip J. Caswell, P.E. Mark D. Wallis, P.E. Charles A. Erickson Leo M. Pawelsky Harlan M. Olson Susan M. Eberlin, C.P.A. 8. Recalculated total cost to complete the trunk sewer system which is now $1.5 million. 9. Revised trunk sewer phasing schedule to show substantial comple- tion by 1994 and total completion by year 2000. 10. Provided a Section on On -site sewage systems written to conform with current State of Minnesota Rule 7080. 11. All appendices were recalculated and up -dated based on current construction and the most current design data. 12. Design flows in almost all sections of the West Trunk were re- duced based on actual development and projected densities of development. 13. Design flows in critical sections of the Central Trunk were re- duced based on actual development and projected development. 14. Design flows in some critical sections of the North Trunk in Industrial areas were reduced based on actual development. Critical sections must be closely monitored in the event of wet industries desiring to locate in certain areas. Flow measurements were carried out in portions of the builtup Cedar Grove residential area and in certain industrial areas to compare actual flows with estimated flows based on the system design criteria. In each case, the design criteria was found to be conservative and the actual flows were significantly less than the estimated. With careful monitoring and judicious locating of any wet industries, it is anticipated that full saturation development can occur with no serious trunk sewer overloading. The Staff and Council should move forward to adopt the recommended regulations on On -site Sewage Disposal Systems and establish the necessary monitoring pro- gram for these systems. This is fully discussed in the section starting on page 39 of the Report. We would be pleased to discuss in more detail any portion of the report with the City Council and Staff should you so desire. Respectfully submitted, B0NESTR00, ROSENE, ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES, INC. Robert W. Rosene RWR:1i cc: Tom Hedges Tom Colbert Joe Connolly 24 Page 2. Bonestroo Rosene Anderlik & 1 Associates Engineers & Architects September 15, 1988 Honorable Mayor and City Council City of Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55122 Otto G. Bonestroo, P.E. Robert W. Rosene, P.E. Joseph C. Anderlik, P.E. Bradford A. Lemberg, P.E. Richard E. Turner, P.E. James C. Olson, P.E. Glenn R. Cook, P.E. Thomas E. Noyes, P.E. Robert G. Schunicht, P.E. Marvin L. Sorvala, P.E. Re: 1988 Water Supply and Distribution Plan City of Eagan File No. 49437 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Dear Mayor and Council: Keith A. Gordon, P.E. Richard W. Foster, P.E. Donald C. Burgardt, P.E. Jerry A. Bourdon, P.E. Mark A. Hanson, P.E. Ted K. Field, P.E. Michael T. Rautmann, P.E. Robert R. Pfefferle, P.E. David O. Loskota, P.E. Thomas W. Peterson, P.E. Michael C. Lynch, P.E. James R. Ma land, P.E. Kenneth P Anderson, P.E. Keith A. Bachmann, P.E. Mark R. Rolfs, P.E. Robert C. Russek, A.I.A. Thomas E. Angus, P.E. Howard A. Sanford, P.E. Daniel J. Edgerton, P.E. Mark A. Seip, P.E. Philip J. Caswell, P.E. Mark D. Wallis, P.E. Charles A. Erickson Leo M. Pawelsky Harlan M. Olson Susan M. Eberlin, C.P.A. The 1988 update of the Water Supply and Distribution Plan provides a complete recalculation of the water supply and distribution system based on saturation development and using the latest computer technology to more precisely model the many varying conditions of peak flows and fire flows together with the storage reservoirs, wells, treatment plant, booster stations and varying ele- vations throughout the system. Improved computer technology between the 1982 Report and the 1988 Report allowed a more detailed analysis of the effect on the total system of an in- credible number of details of interrelated components. The major changes from the 1982 Report to the current Report are as follows: 24 1. Revised land use and water uses in accordance with the current Land Use Guide Plan and existing development. 2. Provided new saturation population estimates based on City of Eagan and Metro Council estimates. City of Eagan estimates were used for saturation projections. Saturation population was reduced from 121,000 to 100,000. 3. The same unit water demands used in 1982 were used in 1988 but the estimated yearly demands were escalated in accordance with the existing development and projected accelerated growth. 4. Due to concerns about the possible drawdown of storage reservoirs over extended dry periods, the raw water supply was increased from 85% of maximum day demand to 95% of maximum day demand. This allows the City to maintain the reservoirs at a higher level during extended periods of peak usage. It also requires more wells than anticipated in the 1982 Report. The number of wells increased from 30 to 36. Page 1. 2335 West Highway 36 • St. Paul, Minnesota 55113 • 612 -636 -4600 5. The 1982 Report discussed the advantages of water treatment and anticipated two increments of growth of the North Well Site treatment plant before construction of a plant at the South Well Site. With the very rapid growth in the south area, the 1988 Report recommends that the treatment plant at the South Well Field be constructed before expanding the capacity of the North Site plant. This will provide better service during peak demand periods in the south area and will allow all of the water from major wells to have iron and manganese removal. 6. Whereas the total amount of storage recommended in 1982 remains essentially the same in 1988, the Lexington Avenue reservoir complex is now recommended to have 4 million gallons (MG) of storage instead of 6 MG. The other 2 MG is to be provided at the south well field site as part of the water plant clearwell capac- ity. This will provide greater dependability and flexibility of storage in the south area. 7. Several changes in the proposed trunk piping and pressure reduc- ing stations are recommended to provide better service to various parts of the system and to refill reservoirs more quickly during off peak periods of high demand days. 8. Some modifications are proposed or noted of the pressure zone boundaries where existing or proposed developments require such changes for proper service. 9. New total cost estimates were prepared for the completion of the trunk system and a new capital improvement program was developed based upon projections of the current rapid growth in the City. 10. All of the appendices were recalculated and a new system layout map was prepared showing all existing and proposed trunk systems in each pressure zone. A great many modeling runs were made on the computer to test the water system under many types of conditions of partial development and water usage condi- tions. System components that provided the best overall conditions of service were included in the final layout. We would be pleased to discuss in more detail the various components of the water system and this report with the Council and staff should you so desire. Respectfully submitted, BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES, INC. LA) Robert W. Rosene RWR:li cc: Tom Hedges - Tom Colbert - Joe Connolly 24 Page 2.