12/06/1988 - City Council RegularAGENDA
REGULAR MEETING
EAGAN CITY COUNCIL
EAGAN, MINNESOTA
MUNICIPAL CENTER BUILDING
DECEMBER 6, 1988
6:30 P.M.
I. 6:30 - ROLL CALL & PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE (BLUE)
II. 6:40 - ADOPT AGENDA & APPROVAL OF MINUTES (BLUE)
1 III. 6:35 - RECOGNITION - FIRE PREVENTION POSTER WINNERS
IV. 6:45 - DEPARTMENT HEAD BUSINESS (BLUE)
V. 6:55 - CONSENT AGENDA (PINK)
PERSONNEL ITEMS
LICENSES, Plumbers
CITY CONTRACT, Receive Bids/Award Contract, Recyclable Containers
FINAL PLAT, All Saints Addition
FINAL PLAT, Sunrise Hills 2nd Addition
VACATE Drainage and Utility Easement, Receive Petition/Order Public Hearing
(Blue Ridge Addition)
CONTRACT 88-33, Approve Plans/Authorize Ad for Bids (Well #13 Pumphouse)
CONTRACT 86-12, Approve Change Order #3 (Wells #8 and 9, Pumping Facilities)
CONTRACT 88-37, Apporve Change Order #1 (Gesco Storm Sewer)
CONTRACT 85-18, Final Acceptance (UPS - Streets and Utilities)
CONTRACT 87-J, Final Acceptance (Pinecrest Addition - Streets and Utilities)
CONTRACT 88-28, Receive Bids/Award Contract (Fire Station #1 - Parking Lot)
PROJECT 557, Receive Feasibility Report/Order Public Hearing (Mallard Park 3rd
Addition - Streetlights)
CONTRACT 88-34, Reject Bids (Alden Pond - Streets and Utilities)
CONTRACT 85-I1, Final Acceptance (Sunset 10th Addition - Utilities)
CONTRACT 87-0, Final Acceptance (Danbury Place - Streets and Utilities)
CONTRACT 87-GGG, Final Acceptance (Patrick Addition - Streets and Utilities)
CONTRACT 86-Y, Final Acceptance (Blackhawk Glen - Streets and Utilities)
CONTRACT 87-21, Final Payment/Acceptance (Eagan Hills Farm - Trunk Utilities)
CONTRACT 87-23, Approve Change Order #1 (Stratford Oaks - Sanitary Sewer Stub)
IMPROVEMENT CONTRACT 87-1, Change Order #4 (Carnelian Park)
IMPROVEMENT CONTRACT 88-7, Change Order #2 (Miscellaneous Work Items for Various
Parks
IMPROVEMENT CONTRACT 88-18, Change Order #1 (Thomas Lake
VI. 7:00 - PUBLIC HEARINGS (SALMON)
VACATE Drainage and Utility Easements, Galaxie Cliff
VACATE Public Right -of -Way for Sunwood Court and
Within A Portion of Sunrise Hills Addition
VACATE Common Lot Line Drainage and Utility Easement
Blackhawk Glen 2nd Addition
Park Pavilion)
Plaza Addition
Drainage/Utility Easements
over Lots 5 and 6, Block 2,
VII. OLD BUSINESS (ORCHID)
42.31 A. MWCC AGREEMENT Regarding Expansion of Seneca Waste Water Treatment Plant
L, 32, B. VARIANCE, Progress Land Co., Inc., 10' Front Yard Variances for Lots 3-11,
Block 3 and a 5' Variance to Front -Yard Setback, Lot 12, Block 3, Country
Hollow Addition, SED of Sec 24
-2•B i C. REZONING of Lot 11, Block 1, Thomas Lake Center Addition, from SF (Single
Family) to PF (Public Facility) for Well #13 Located at the NE Intersection of
Lake Park Drive and Cliff Road in SES of Section 28
0. (4 5 D. SET Date and Amount for Referendum to Finance the Community Center Project
VIII. NEW BUSINESS (TAN)
F•4 4 A. CITY CODE AMENDMENTS, Sections 6.37 and 10.01/Solid Waste and Recycling
9.S6B. RATIFICATION of Position Statement Regarding Metropolitan Council Airport
SI�i Adequacy Study
C. VARIANCE, Sons Construction Company, Inc., Requesting a 13' Variance to the
. Required 50' Public Right -of -Way Setback to Allow a Three -Season Porch, Lot 1,
Block 1, Safari Addition
•C a D. CONSIDERATION of 1989 Fee Schedule
f• S\
E. RECEIVE Development District #2 Program and Set Public Hearing
: F. RECEIVE Northeast Eagan Tax Increment Financing District #1 Plan and Set Public
Hearing
IX.
X.
XI.
ADDITIONAL ITEMS (GOLD)
ADMINISTRATIVE AGENDA (GREEN)
VISITORS TO BE HEARD (for those persons not on agenda)
XII. ADJOURNMENT
MEMO TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIIMEMBERS
FROM: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES
DATE:
SUBJECT:
DECEMBER 1, 1988
AGENDA INFORMATION FOR THE DECEMBER 6, 1988 CITY
COUNCIL MEETING
=ADOPT AGENDA-APPROVEMINUTES
After approval is given to the December 6, 1988 agenda and
regular minutes for the November 15, 1988 City Council meeting
and special minutes for the October 27, November 22 and November
29 meetings, the following items are in order for consideration.
f RECOGNITION, OE FIRE:` PREVENTION:: POSTER WINNERS
As a part of the official Fire Prevention Week activities,
children are invited to prepare fire prevention posters. Those
posters are judged and the winners of this year's poster contest
are Katie Opatrny, Jaclyn Nelson, and Laura Caldwell.
Mayor Ellison and Fire Chief Southorn will officially recognize
the children at Tuesday night's meeting.
Agenda Information Memo
December 6, 1988, City Council Meeting
CONSENT AGENDA
There are twenty-three (23) items on the agenda referred to as
consent items requiring one (1) motion by the City Council. If
the City Council wishes to discuss any of the items in further
detail, those items should be removed from the Consent Agenda and
placed under Additional Items unless the discussion required is
brief.
PERSONNEL ITEMS
A. PERSONNEL ITEMS:
Item 1. Street Maintenance Supervisor --Over 60 applications were
received for this position. After screening, 24 applicants were
invited to the Eagan Municipal Center to take a written test on
Tuesday, November 29. After reviewing the results of that
testing and also of the answers to essay questions which the
applicants brought with them, the field of candidates was
narrowed to eight. Those eight candidates are being interviewed
on Friday afternoon, December 2. The interview panel will
consist of Director of Public Works Colbert, Superintendent of
Streets/Equipment Erhart, the Superintendent of Streets from
Little Canada and Administrative Assistant Duffy. If a decision
is able to be reached by the time of the council meeting on
December 6, the name of the successful applicant will be
presented to Council at that time for the Council's approval,
subject, of course, to successful completion of the City's
physical examination requirement.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the hiring of
an applicant (yet to be named) as Street Supervisor for the City
of Eagan, subject to successful completion of the City's physical
examination requirement.
Item 2. Winter Seasonal Park Maintenance Worker --After
interviews, it is the recommendation of the Superintendent of
Parks VonDeLinde that Cary Stevens, Mike Finnegan and Steve Baehr
be hired as winter seasonal Park Maintenance Workers.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the hiring of
Cary Stevens, Mike Finnegan and Steve Baehr as winter seasonal
Park Maintenance Workers.
Item 3. Winter Seasonal Recreation Staff --Interviews have been
conducted with applicants for winter seasonal recreation staff
positions. It is the recommendation of Recreation Supervisor
Dorothy Peterson that the following individuals be hired for the
Agenda Information Memo
December 6, 1988, City Council Meeting
Returning
Stephen Cramer
Bradley Czubernat
-Rob DeRosier
Kevin Duffy
Brent Eichten
Sean Flaherty
Michael Greene
Tim Gill
Dana Iffert
Robert Kerry
Rebecca Latzke
Timothy McElligott
Thomas McNurlin
John McShane
Robert Merrill
Jeffrey Olson
Katherine Roche
Brent Tait
John Tracy
Jason Wandersee
Tom Wise
Scott Ellingson
New
Michael Bushard
C. Todd Gerken
Andrew Halverson
Mindy Jo Kaltenhauser
Cory Lynch
Mike Polski
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the list of
winter seasonal recreation staff for the 1988 - 1989 skating and
sliding season.
3
Agenda Information Memo
December 6, 1988, City Council Meeting
PLUMBERS LICENSES
B. Plumbers Licenses --There are five (5) plumbers licenses that
are in order for consideration. All five (5) have complied with
City Code provisions regarding licensing requirements. Those
companies requesting a license are as follows:
1. AAA Plumbing by Newstrom, Inc.
2. Forcier Plumbing
3. Klamm Mechanical Contractors, Inc.
4. Main Line Plumbing
5. Weidner Plumbing & Heating, Inc.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve all five (5)
plumbers licenses as presented.
RECEIVE BIDS/AWARD CONTRACT
RECYCLABLE CONTAINERS
C. City Contract, Receive Bids/Award Contract for Recyclable
Containers --At the November 15, 1988 City Council meeting,
authorization was given to approve specifications for a two -bin
stackable recyclable container and authorize a b' opening for
Thursday, December 1, 1988. Enclosed on page is a copy of
the specification for curbside recyclable containers that was
reviewed and approved by the City Council at the November 15
meeting.
Low bid was received of Rehrig Pacific Company at a cost of $9.68
per two-piece unitnd a total 14,000 set cost of $135,520.
Enclosed on page (p is a copy of the bid tabulation. Both
firms on the bid tabulation responded in a timely manner and met
the specifications as presented.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the responsible
bid for recyclable containers as presented by Rehrig Pacific
Company.
CITY OF EAGAN, MINNESOTA
SPECIFICATIONS
FOR
CURBSIDE RECYCLABLE CONTAINERS
Compliance Exception
GENERAL DESCRIPTION: Two (2) piece stackable recycling
container system
APPROXIMATE DIMENSIONS:
Outside: 20"w X 15"d X 13"h
Inside: 18"w X 14"d X 11"h
APPROXIMATE WEIGHT: Not to exceed 5.5 pounds per piece
MATERIAL: High Density Polyethylene Resin or Acceptable
Alternate; with ultraviolet color stabiliza-
tion properties
COLOR: One (1) container in green to be approved by
the City
One (1) container in white to be approved by
the City
MARKINGS: "CITY OF EAGAN" (Both)
Recycling Arrow Logo (Both)
"GLASS" [One (1)]
"CANS" [One (1)]
Markings to be stamped or embossed
OTHER FEATURES: No fewer than four (4) drainage holes
per piece
DELIVERY DATE: No later than February 1, 1989
QUANTITY: 14,000 two (2) piece units, initial run
TWO PIECE STACKABLE RECYCLING CONTAINERS
BID OPENING, DECEMBER 1, 1988 2:00 P.M.
Jon Hohenstein
Elizabeth Witt
1. Rehrig Pacific Company
2. Shamrock Industries
3. Shamrock Industries
(different materials)
Per Unit Total
$9.68 $135,520.00
$10.76 $150,640.00
$10.76 $150,640.00
Agenda Information Memo
December 6, 1988, City Council Meeting
APPROVE FINAL PLAT/ALL SAINTS ADDN
D. Approve Final Plat, All Saints Addition --Staff has received
an application for final plat approval for the All Saints
Addition located in the southeast quadrant of Lexington Av ue
and Wescott Road as shown by the plat enclosed on page
All conditions of the preliminary plat approval granted by
Council action on July 19, 1988, have been satisfactorily
complied with. All final plat application materials have been
submitted, reviewed by staff and found to be in order for
favorable Council action.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the final plat
for the All Saints Addition and authorize the Mayor and City
Clerk to execute all related documents.
ADDITION
3
3
6
—
I r
•
'1
k 1
Yr'ESCOTT
a
k.1
• - a
e =
jQ
1
!. c
i • t
• .
c t
E 5 t
;
•
t k
t •
1t 6 t
- •
c
•
t
• ,
t
. t
1.1
;
‘>:4,
I I..•••••5 ea 1.21 .45 ••• 1,55
I Oi5111:1
t I
r 1
a•t,
5s
!
t
s.
k•
Zi
• 6
C 6
A A.
1' I
it
4,00.0 S
XI/43AV NOIONIXTI)
li
11
Li. 'ON AVAINOIN 011, 3AVIS AI/41303
.1.04,1a0.0 14
tat s -
AV:AN:MN 1:11/
41 .1 41.r...1 amo et, ••
174
,ic.
: •
I-•
A I
...1)...1.
_ ____ T____
••
••• 1
V I
....7 1
1
.11 1
'3...It It
• 5
- ,
'a -
i
..
y
A
,
1
.
4
a
Agenaa Information Memo
December 6, 1988, City Council Meeting
APPROVE FINAL PLAT/SUNRISE HILLS ADDN
E. Approve Final Plat, Sun Rise Hills Addition --Staff has
received an application for final plat approval for the Sunrise
Hills Addition located in the southeast quarter of Section 14
south of Duckwood Drive and north of Wescott Road as shown by the
plat enclosed on page 10 . All conditions of the preliminary
plat approval granted by 4'ouncil action on March 17, 1987, have
been satisfactorily complied with. All final plat application
materials have been submitted, reviewed by staff and found to be
in order for favorable Council action.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the final plat
for the Sunrise Hills Addition and authorize the Mayor and City
Clerk to execute all related documents.
00
2G'96
6b,f0.2IS
DA
• c
CO
' N
w
i
0
CJ
} Ul
M�1 i1i �r
ip
Agenda information Memo
December 6, 1988, City Council Meeting
VACATION/ORDER PUBLIC HEARING
F. Vacate Drainage & Utility Easement, Receive Petition/Order
Public Hearing (Blue Ridge Addition) --Staff has received a
petition to vacate a previously existing common lot line drainage
ani utility easement located within the existing Blue Ridge
Addition. This vacation is precipitated by a previous replatting
of the property wherein the lot lines were relocated but the
underlying common lot line easement was not vacated.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To receive the petition to
vacate a common lot line drainage and utility easement within the
Blae Ridge Addition and schedule a public hearing to be held January
3, 1989.
APPROVE PLANS/AUTHORIZE AD FOR BIDS/WELL #13
G. Contract 88-33, Approve Plans/Authorize Ad For Bids (Well
#13 Pumphouse)--The consulting engineer has completed the
detailed design plans for the wellhouse and related pumping
facilities necessary for the completion of Well *13 located on
Cliff Road and Lake Park Drive. The final design of the well
house has taken into consideration several comments received from
two neighborhood meetings with the residents with the Lake Park
Shore, Thomas Lake Addition and Walden Heights Addition. These
plans are being presented to the Council for their review and
authorization to advertise for competitive bids. Also included
with this contract is the installation of a third pump within the
Lexington Booster Station facility located at Diffley Road.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the plans for
Contract 88-33 (Well *13 - Pumphouse) and authorize the
advertisement for a bid opening to be held at 10:30 a.m. on
Thursday, December 29, 1988.
n
Agenda Information Memo
December 6, 1988, City Council Meeting
APPROVE CHANGE ORDER #3 WELLS #8 & 9
H. Contract 86-12, Approve Change Order #3 (Wells #8 & 9 -
Pumping Facilities) --This Change Order consists of three parts
described as follows:
Part A: Due to geological construction problems associated
with the construction of Deep Well #8, there were
unavoidable delays incurred in allowing the construction of
the pumphouse facility to begin. Subsequently, the
contractor incurred increased labor and material costs
associated with this 10 -month delay. (Add $7,671.66).
Part B: Based on actual test pumping of this well, the
previous design of the pump facility was modified to a
smaller pump. (Deduct $2,317).
Part C: A revised site grading plan required the adjustment
of an existing hydrant and gate valve. (Add $560)
All costs associated with this Change Order will be
the responsibility of the Water Supply/Development Enterprise
Fund. (Add $5,914.66).
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve Change Order #3
to Contract 86-12 (Wells #8 & 9 - Pumping Facilities) and
authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute all related
documents.
APPROVE CHANGE ORDER #1/GENERAL ELECTRIC SUPPLY COMPANY
I. Contract 88-37, Approve Change Order #1 (General Electric
Supply Company - Storm Sewer) --This Change Order provides for the
relocation of an existing sanitary sewer and water service to the
Barlow Salm Building adjacent to the proposed General Electric
Supply Company (GESCO) due to an elevation conflict with the
storm sewer facility necessary to handle the drainage of the
GESCO development within the Eagandale Center Industrial Park
along the West Service Drive. These costs are broken into two
parts described as follows:
Part A:
Relay 6" sanitary sewer service. (Add $227.75).
Part B: Lower and reconstruct
$2,102.74).
8"
water service. (Add
All costs associated with this Change Order will be the full
assessment responsibility of the GESCO development.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve Change Order #1
to Contract 88-37 (GESCO - Storm Sewer) and authorize the Mayor
and City Clerk to execute all related documents.
\D-
Agenda Information Memo
December 6, 1988, City Council Meeting
FINAL ACCEPTANCE/UPS ADDN
J. Contract 85-18, Final Acceptance (UPS Addition - Streets &
Utilities) --The improvements associated with servicing the UPS
Facility constructed under Contract 85-18 have now been completed
to the extent of satisfactory compliance with City approved plans
and specifications. All final inspections have been performed by
representatives of the Public Works Department and found to be in
order for favorable Council action of acceptance for perpetual
maintenance.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: Approve Contract 85-18
(UPS Addition - Streets & Utilities) for final acceptance and
perpetual maintenance.
FINAL ACCEPTANCE/PINECREST ADDN
K. Contract 87-J, Final Acceptance (Pinecrest Addition - Streets
& Utilities) --The streets and utilities installed privately
within the Pinecrest Addition under the above -referenced contract
have been completed in accordance with City approved plans and
specifications verified by final inspection by representatives of
the Public Works Department.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To authorize the final
acceptance of Contract 87-J (Pinecrest Addition - Streets &
Utilities) for perpetual maintenance.
RECEIVE BIDS/AWARD CONTRACT/FIRE STATION #1 PARKING LOT
L. Receive Bids/Award Contract (Fire Station #1 - Parking Lot) --
At 10:30 a.m. on December 2, 1988, formal bids were received for
the improvement of the parking lot facility for Fire Station #1.
Enclosed on page t„4 is a tabulation of the bids received with
a Vcomparison of the low bid to the feasibility report and
engineer's estimate. The budget allocation contained within the
Fire Department Budget is $31,000 for the improvement of the
parking lots for Fire Stations #1, #2 and #3. All bids will be
reviewed for accuracy and completeness and any changes or
irregularities will be identified at the December 6 Council
meeting.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To receive the bids for
Contract 88-28 (Fire Station #1 - Parking Lot) and award the
contract to the lowest responsible bidder.-
PARKING LOT CONSTRUCTION
FIRE STATION NO. 1
CONTRACT NO. 88-28
FOR
EAGAN, MINNESOTA
BID TIME: 10:30 A.M.
BID DATE: FRIDAY, DECEMBER 2, 1988
CONTRACTORS TOTAL BASE BID
1. Munn Blacktop, Inc. $ 18,868.50
2. H. L. Johnson Co. 20,429.00
3. Daily & Son Blacktopping 20,659.10
4. Valley Paving, Inc. 22,045.65
5. Barber Construction, Inc. 22,567.00
6. Bituminous Roadways, Inc. 22,908.75
7. Alber Construction, Inc. 25,727.75
LOW BID $ 18,868.50
FEASIBILITY REPORT ESTIMATE $ 25,485.00
ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE $ 15,655.00
% OVER (+) UNDER (-) (F.R.) - 26%
% OVER (+) UNDER (-) (E.E.) + 20.5%
$31,000.00 was allocated for parking lot construction for Fire
Stations 1, 2, and 3.
1
(E
Agenda Information Memo
December 6, 1988, City Council Meeting
RECEIVE FEASIBILITY REPT/MALLARD PK 3RD ADDN - STREET LIGHTS
M. Projec 557, Receive Feasibility Report/Order Public Hearing
(Mallard Park 3rd Addition - Street Lights) --In response to a
petition presented by the residents of the Mallard Park 3rd
Addition, the Council authorized the preparation of a feasibility
report discussing the installation of street lights within that
subdivision. This feasibility report has now been completed and
is being presented to the Council for consideration of
scheduling a formal public hearing.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To receive the feasibility
report for Project 357 and schedule a public hearing to be held
for January 17, 1989.
REJECT BIDS/ALDEN POND
N. Contract 88-34, Reject Bids (Alden Pond - Streets &
Utilities) --In response to a petition by the developers of the
proposed Alden Pond development adjacent to Coachman Road south
of Four Oaks Road, the Council approved plans and authorized the
advertisement for bids for the installation of internal streets
and utilities. On October 14, formal bids were received for
consideration by the Council awarding the contract. However, the
developer did not proceed with the final plat process necessary
to consider the award of contract. Recent discussions with
representatives of the Rosewood Corporation indicate that they
would prefer to delay the scheduling of their project until the
spring/summer of 1989. Subsequently, the proposed scheduling
identified in the specifications are no longer compatible. Also,
the developer feels to readvertise during the winter of 1989
miga t result in more favorable bids.
Therefore, without the final plat process being completed
providing for the necessary easements and dedicated right-of-way
for the installation of these public facilities, it is
app:-opriate for the Council to reject these bids and cancel
Contract 88-34.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To receive and reject the
bids submitted for Contract 38-34 (Alden Pond - Streets &
Utilities) and cancel the related City contract.
Agenda Information Memo
December 6, 1988, City Council Meeting
FINAL ACCEPTANCE/SUNSET 10TH ADDN
O. Contract 85 -II, Final Acceptance (Sunset 10th Addition -
Utilities) --The staff has received a recommendation for final
acceptance of the utilities installed within the Sunset 10th
Addition. All final inspections have been performed by
representatives of the Public Works Department and found to be in
order for favorable Council action.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To authorize the final
acceptance and perpetual maintenance of Contract 85 -II (Sunset
10th Addition - Utilities).
FINAL ACCEPTANCE/DANBURY PLACE
P. Contract 87-0, Final Acceptance (Danbury Place - Streets &
Utilities) --Staff has received certification of completion of the
streets and utilities installed under Contract 87-0 within the
Danbury Place Addition along with a Certification of Compliance
to City approved plans and specifications. All filial inspections
have been performed by representatives of the Public Works
Department and found to be in order for favorable Council action.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the final
acceptance for perpetual maintenance of Contract 87-0 (Danbury
Place - Streets & Utilities).
FINAL ACCEPTANCE/PATRICK ADDITION)
Q. Contract 87-GGG, Final Acceptance (Patrick Addition - Streets
& Utilities) --The improvements installed under the above -
referenced contract have been completed in compliance with City
approved plans and specifications. All final inspections have
been performed by representatives of the Public Works Department
and found to be in order for favorable Council action.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To accept for perpetual
maintenance the improvements installed under Contract 87-GGG
(Patrick Addition - Streets & Utilities).
FINAL ACCEPTANCE/BLACKHAWK GLEN
R. Contract 86-Y, Final Acceptance (Blackhawk Glen - Streets &
Utilities) --The improvements installed within the above -
referenced contract have been completed in compliance with City
approved plans and specifications. All final inspections have
been performed by representatives of the Public Works Department
and found to be in order for favorable Council action.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the final
acceptance for perpetual maintenance of Contract 86-Y (Blackhawk
Glen - Streets & Utilities).
Aqnda Information Memo
December 6, 1988, City Council Meeting
6TH & FINAL PYMT/EAGAN HILLS FARM
S. Contract 87-21, 6th & Final Payment/Acceptance (Eagan Hills
Farm - Trunk Utilitiies)--Staff has received a request for final
payment from the contractor along with a certification of final
completion and compliance with City approved plans and
specifications for the improvements installed under the above -
referenced contract. All final inspections have been performed
by representatives of the Public Works Department and found to be
in order for favorable Council action.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To authorize the 6th and
final payment for Contract 87-21 (Eagan Hills Farm - Trunk
Utilities) and authorize final acceptance of perpetual
maintenance.
APPROVE CHANGE ORDER/STRATFORD OAKS
T. Contract 87-23, Approve Change Order #1 (Stratford Oaks -
Sanitary Sewer Stub) --Sanitary sewer service to the proposed
Stratford Oaks Addition located in the southwest quadrant of
Diffley and Thomas Lake Roads was to be provided from the Boulder
Ridge townhouse development on the side south of Diffley Road
between Thomas Lake Road and Heine Lake. The improvements within
the Boulder Ridge Addition were constructed privately but were to
be within the same time frame as the installation of the sanitary
sewer for Stratford Oaks under Project 549. Due to a delay by
the developer in proceeding with the final plat of the Stratford
Oaks Addition, the award of the contract for Project 549 did not
commence within the proposed time schedule. However, the
connection to the sewer within the Boulder Ridge Addition was
located within the new street right-of-way. Therefore, it was
determined that the most cost effective method would be to
construct enough sanitary sewer lateral to get out from under the
proposed new street construction. This construction was added as
a Change Order to Contract 87-23. All costs associated with this
work will be the responsibility of and fully assessed under
Project 549. (Add $1,781).
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve Change Order *1
to Contract 87-23 (Stratford Oaks Addition - Sanitary Sewer
Extension) .
Agenda Information Memo
December 6, 1988, City Council Meeting
IMPROVEMENT CONTRACT 87-1
CARNELIAN PARK
U. Improvement Contract 87-1, Change Order #4 for Carnelian
Park --The City staff is requesting City Council review of Change
Order #4 for Improvement Contract 87-1. The scope of work
includes the additional labor and machine time to grade Carnelian
Park. The site did not balance and additional work was necessary
to finish the park. The cost associated with this work is
$2,500.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve Change Order #4
of Improvement Contract 87-1 for an amount of $2,500.
IMPROVEMENT CONTRACT 88-7
MISCELLANEOUS PARK WORK
V. Improvement Contract 88-7, Change Order #2 for Miscellaneous
Work Items for Various Parks --The Director of Parks and
Recreation is requesting the consideration of Change Order #2 of
Improvement Contract 88-7 for miscellaneous work items as
described in the attached document, referred to as pages
through o . The total amount of the change ordei is
$29,352.53.
The staff's review concludes that the cost is a good value based
on the bid amounts of past projects.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve Change Order #2
of Improvement Contract 88-7 for an amount of $29,352.53.
CHANGE ORDER
DATE: November 10, 1988
PROJECT: Parks Construction
CONTRACT: I.C. 88-7
OWNER: CITY OF EAGAN
Parks & Recreation Department
CONTRACTOR: Central Landscaping Inc.
13655 Lake Dr.
Forest Lake, MN 55025
CHANGE ORDER NO: #2
Description of Work:
This change order provides payment to the contractor for costs incurred for
the materials and labor on items not included with Improvement Contract 88-7.
Compensation shall be in accordance with the following line items:
A. OHMANN PARK/MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS
Change Order Item Unit Price Est'd. Qty. Total Amount
1. Subgrade correction CY
of poor soil within
parking lot area
$1.00
2,333 $2,333.00
2. Adjust height of man-
hole #1 & #2
690 Backhoe HR 65.00 6 390.00
Tandem HR 35.00 6 210.00
Foreman HR 25.00 4 100.00
Laborer HR 21.12 13 274.56
Manhole extensions LS 475.00 1 475.00
3. Bldg. Curb removal &
replacement LF 10.00 85 850.00
4. Adjust C.B. located
between soccer fields
#2 & #3
Bobcat HR 35.00 1 35.00
D-4 HR 65.00 1 65.00
Tandem HR 35.00 3 105.00
Foreman HR 25.00 2 50.00
Laborer HR 21.12 7 147.84
C.B. extension LS 252.38 1 252.38
5. Common Borrow for
C.B. adjustment
950 Loader HR 65.00 3 195.00
Tandem HR 35.00 6 210.00
Laborer HR 21.12 9 190.08
6. Adjust height to LS 1,009.30 1 $1,009.30
hydrant, curb box &
gate valve
t.c1
7. Drying poor soils HR 65.00 8 520.00
D-4 dozen
(Operators)
SUBTOTAL PART A $7,412.16
B. SLATER ACRES PARK/MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS
Change Order Item Unit Price Est'd. Qty. Total Amount
1. Subgrade Excavation CY
for topsoil salvage
.50 3,060 $1,530.00
2. Topsoil Borrow CY 5.50 51 280.50
3. Subgrade correction
of trail adjacent to
pond. Import of CI
.#5 for stabilization
Tandem HR 35.00 1 35.00
Laborer HR 21.12 1 21.12
CI.#5 crushed LS 280.00 1 280.00
quarry rock
C. BRIDLE RIDGE PARK
Change Order Item
SUBTOTAL PART B: $2,146.62
Unit Price Est'd. Qty. Total Amount
1. Mixing common
borrow, placement
& restoration of
borrow pit for parking
lot curb backfill
Scraper HR 65.00 9.5
D. RAHN PARK
617.50
SUBTOTAL PART C: $ 617.50
Change Order Item Unit Price Est'd Qty. Total Amount
1. Subgrade prepara-
tion, rock place-
ment for bituminous
trail removed due to
utility service imple-
mentation
Class #5 crushed LS $140.00 1 $140.00
aggregate
Bobcat HR 35.00 2.5 87.50
Laborer HR 21.12 5 105.60
Tandem HR 35.00 1.5 52.50
Operator HR 24.60 2.5 61.50
2. Install concrete sidewalk
sawcut & remove existing
bituminous trail adjacent
to pedestrian ramp
Bobcat HR 35.00 3 105.00
950 Loader HR 65.00 1 65.00
Tandem HR 35.00 1 35.00
Concrete saw LS 150.00 1 150.00
Concrete sidewalk SF 2.50 493.5 1,233.75
10% general contr. LS 123.37 1 123.37
for concrete sidewalk
3. Install water main for
irrigation system
690 Backhoe HR 65.00 19 1,235.00
Laborer HR 21.12 30 633.60
Wet Tap LS 725.00 1 725.00
Materials LS 1,160.89 1 1,160.89
Tamper HR 6.25 16 100.00
Testing LS 950.00 1 950.00
Operator HR 24.60 8 196.80
Foreman HR 25.00 15 375.00
4. Restoration adjacent
to park shelter
Topsoil CY 5.50 12.8 70.40
Sod SY 1.10 580 638.00
Laborer HR 21.12 12 253.44
SUBTOTAL PART D: $8,497.35
E. BERRY RIDGE PATH/MOONEY LAKE
Change Order Item Unit Price Est'd Qty Total Amount
D-4 Dozen HR $65.00 21.5 $1,397.50
690 Backhoe HR 65.00 18 1,170.00
Tandem HR 35.00 30 1,050.00
Laborer HR 21.12 34 718.08
Operator HR 24.60 20 492.00
Foreman HR 25.00 14 350.00
Low Boy trailer HR 45.00 1 45.00
12" CMP LF 17.00 10 170.00
Tail Gate Paver HR 37.50 8 300.00
Class #5 crushed Ton 4.90 292 1,430.80
aggregate
SUBTOTAL PART E. $7,123.38
F. O'LEARY PARK
Change Order Item Unit Price Est'd Qty Total Amount
1. Topsoil placement
fine grading & rest-
oration of trail and
pedestrian bridge area
Topsoil Import CY $5.50 38.4 $ 211.20
Laborer HR 21.12 4 84.48
Sod SY 1.10 566 622.60
2. Topsoil Placement, final
grading & restoration ad-
jacent to sun shelter
Topsoil Import CY $ 5.50 25.6 $140.80
Laborer HR 21.12 2 42.24
Sod SY 1.10 422 464.20
G. CARNELIAN PARK
Change Order Item
SUBTOTAL PART F $1,565.52
Unit Price Est'd Qty Total Amount
1. Raise hydrant to
accommodate parking
lot improvement
Hydrant extension LS $500.00 1 $500.00
H. NORTHVIEW PARK
Change Order Item
SUBTOTAL PART G. $500.00
Unit Price Est'd Qty Total Amount
1. Revise grading to
swale between ballfields
and soccerfields
12 C.M.P. LF $ 17.00
Apron Each 150.00
70'
2
SUBTOTAL:
$1,190.00
300.00
$1,490.00
OHMANN PARK
SLATER ACRES
BRIDLE RIDGE
RAHN PARK
BERRY RIDGE PATH/
MOONEY LAKE
O'LEARY PARK
CARNELIAN
NORTHVIEW PARK
TOTAL CHANGE ORDER:
CHANGE ORDER SUMMARY
PART A Subtotal
PART B Subtotal
PART C Subtotal
PART D Subtotal
PART E Subtotal
PART F Subtotal
PART G Subtotal
PART H Subtotal
ORIGINAL CONTRACT AMOUNT:
CHANGE ORDER #1
CHANGE ORDER #2
REVISED CONTRACT AMOUNT:
$243,560.93
16,910.08
29,352.53
$289,823.54
APPROVED BY: CENTRAL LANDSCAPING, INC.
APPROVED BY: CITY OF EAGAN
, MAYOR
, CLERK
DATE:
DISTRIBUTION:
1. City of Eagan, Parks & Recreation Department
2. City of Eagan, Finance Department
3. Contractor
;3
$7,412.16
2,146.62
617.50
8,497.35
7,123.38
1,565.52
500.00
1,490.00
Agenda Information Memo
December 6, 1988, City Council Meeting
IMPROVEMENT CONTRACT 88-18
THOMAS LAKE PARR PAVILION
W. Improvement Contract 88-18, Change Order #1 for Thomas Lake
Pavilion --The Director of Parks and Recreation is requesting
authorization of Change Order #1 within Improvement Contract 88-
18 regarding a pavilion at Thomas Lake Park. There are two (2)
items to be considered as a part of the change order and they are
as follows: 1) materials and labor to install a septic and drain
field system. The change is a result of incorrect engineering by
Allied Testing resulting in the need for redesign to include a
pump station and relocated drain field. The estimated cost is
$10,878. The staff has reviewed several alternatives and found
this system most operationally efficient and cost effective.
2) Continuation of a concrete sidewalk from the building to the
existing trail system. This item was not included in the project
to allow for design in the field once the structure is complete.
The trail is a necessary link for the operation of the structure
and the cost is estimated at $450.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve Change Order
#1 for an amount of $11,328 which includes both the
aforementioned items.
d '%
Agenda Information Memo
December 6, 1988, City Council Meeting
` PUBLIC ` HEARINGS
VACATION/GALAXIE CLIFF PLAZA ADDN
A. Vacate Drainage & Utility Easements (Galaxie Cliff Plaza
Addition) --On November 1, the Council received a petition and
scheduled a public hearing to be held on December 6 to discuss
the vacation of drainage/utility and ponding easements located
within the proposed Galaxie Cliff Plaza Addition. The existing
underlying ponding easement is being redescribed to better
conform to the proposed development and will be adequately
rededicated as a part of the final plat of the Galaxie Cliff
Plaza Addition. This item should be continued to the December 20,
1988, Council meeting in order to approve the vacation at the
same Council meeting that the final plat, with replacement
easement, is approved.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To continue this item to
the December 20, 1988, City Council meeting.
as
Agenda Information Memo
December 6, 1988, City Council Meeting
VACATION/SUNWOOD COURT
B. Vacate Public Right -of -Way & Drainage/Utility Easement
(Sunwood Court & Sunrise Hills Addition) --In response to a
petition submitted by the property owners of the affected
property, the Council scheduled a public hearing to discuss the
vacation of existing drainage, utility and ponding easements
located within the proposed Sunrise Hills Addition as well as the
vacation of the dedicated right-of-way for Sunwood Court as shown
by the maps enclosed on pages 4,17 through This
subdivision is being replatted, with the Sunwood Court access
being relocated to provide better access grades taking into
consideration the conflict with the existing Williams Brothers
Pipeline easement as well as relocating the proposed common lot
lines for each of the individual outlots. All required common
lot line drainage and utility easements as well as ponding
easements and related public right-of-way for Sunwood Court are
being rededicated under the Sunrise Hills 2nd Addition.
All notices were published in the legal newspaper and sent to all
potentially affected utility companies informing them of this
public hearing. As of this date, the staff has not received any
objections regarding this petition.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To close the public
hearing and vacate public right-of-way and drainage/utility
easements within the Sunrise Hills Addition.
Co
/ \ 4` n N
N ON
s�N
°O
`
\ Z ` LL!CICI7 -i 1/.)1-I:.- r' 1s
L{{ 9e
1� f,�' 4t =1F-11 _Ill 11
law •f`/ /s 10CI-,.,5 110:)!:;=:,V, s5s
O;
0 6G
�� / 1' 3H1 30 1,NN i41 to auil YIn05
M„Z Z,61,68 N
9
N
---M „ZZ ,61 069 N---
>1 03S•b/I 35 •►/i MN
3,n io a3v607�M51
6
l/
�, 0 i Z LS 4.0 S a
.a��o
\ � I v� / o�
\ po or b 1 S ,/ &filg
e •A Iv A% /0
Cb .6' / \,D W IN �� !%� / /
\ 3-rC,,,,esm Im ,
,//
35tl3 AA�30tlNiV O oo�/--•!�` / / /
N ti\'' 1 ,
IA O C, L
C ▪ i- L
m 7 o x M „bS,IZZB N
B .. - •T U Z
• ry---0052B ISOCb CS 1--•
CO C w T.
CU i-, IC N 0 i.+
o • .+ -C C
T J •• L ++ 7
.0 -- C 0
•.-1 In 7 0 L)
.-H N ,L V)) i-,
..-1 O U IC
7 ) .-. = C 0
IQ m - -
-o -o -o 10
C -C C L 0
co C •--, co 0
CO U •
0+ i-, CJ U 4-.
C, L 0 CO0
091.L QOOMssd
,89 SCI •a
,60,Is.2c-v A
,3O
N
EASEMENTS TO BE
18
-69'591 —
o) J L. Q)
C -0• L
C - C Q1
CO 7 (.0 W 0 -C
L ++
O - Y -
u O ••1 i-,
CU o -0 0
▪ > • v
• 0 CO v • 0.
'"..:**(‘;‘:,.'6/. O
•
55 C5 �1N
6,. -\
.o 90.
RECEIVEDFEB 3145,
rr) 0
roLc)
00
8
7.
o-
3i
•
"
VL
1 v LJ
0•
4 0
Q
4
s
5.02
i1
oros
1'
i1 ()11
r
AREA TO BE VACATED:
O/ 'LS
„‘,z,rSotPs =v
1
•
ALL THAT PART OF SUNWOOD COURT WITHIN SUNRISE HILLS
AEDITION LYING SOUTH OF WESCOTT HILLS DRIVE.
g
Agenda Information Memo
December 6, 1988, City Council Meeting
VACATION/BLACKHAWK GLEN 2ND ADDN
C. Vacate Drainage and Utility Easement (Lot 5, Block 2,
Blackhawk Glen 2nd Addition) --On November 15, the Council
received a petition andscheduled a public hearing to consider the
vacation of a common lot line drainage and utility easement
between Lot 5 and 6 of Block 2, Blackhawk Glen 2nd Addition
necessitated by a Waiver of Plat relocating this common lot line.
Enclosed on page <'� is a sketch showing the location of the
drainage and utility easement to be vacated as well as the
replacement drainage and utility easement which has been conveyed
to the City.
All notices have been published in the legal newspaper and sent
to all potentially affected utility companies informing them of
this public hearing. As of this date, the staff has not received
any objections to the proposed petition.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To close the public
hearing and approve/deny the vacation of the drainage/utility
easement between Lots 5 and 6, Block 2, Blackhawk Glen 2nd
Addition.
a9
bl
. I Z —7-
I�I�V7/I
-L
\ Ns,, �•
0
7` O
g o
rt
zcs
co S3' j6,7
w�
N
Agenda Information Memo
December 6, 1988, City Council Meeting
OLD BUSINESS
MWCC AGREEMENT/SENECA WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT
A. MWCC Agreement Regarding Expansion of Seneca Wastewater
Treatment Plant --Action was taken at the November 15, 1988 City
Council meeting to approve a preliminary plat requested by the
MWCC for expansion of the Seneca Wastewater Treatment Plant.
The City Council also directed the preparation of a development
agreement that addresses grading, foundation, building
requirements, a section on sludge management and a control
mechanism for the monitoring and reduction of odor emitted from
the plant. Recognizing the limitations of City staff expertise
in the area of wastewater treatment plant construction and, more
importantly, odor controls, the City retained Becky Comstock, an
environmental attorney with the Dorsey and Whitney Law Firm and
an engineering consulting firm of Metcalf and Eddy to meet,
negotiate and prepare a development agreement with
representatives of the Metropolitan Waste Control Commission.
The City's consultants have also met with residents who are
concerned about correcting a long-term odor problem and receiving
the necessary assurance that the expansion of the plant will
reduce odor not compound the existing problem.
The consultants, whose expenses will be reimbursed by the MWCC to
the City, have been meeting and negotiating all aspects of the
agreement in an effort to satisfy the concerns that were raised
by members of the City Council at the November 15 meeting.
Enclosed for Council review is a copy of a memo from Becky
Comstock and proposed development agreement.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To adopt the development
agreement that pertains to the preliminary plat approved at the
November 15 meeting for expansion of the Seneca Wastewater
Treatment Plant.
3�
Agenda Information Memo
December 6, 1988, City Council Meeting
VARIANCE/PROGRESS LAND COMPANY
B. Variance, Progress Land Company, Inc., for 10' Front Yard
Variances for Lots 3-11, Block 3, and a 5' Variance to Front and
Setback, Lot 12, Block 3, Country Hollow Addition --At the
November 15 City Council meeting, an application for a variance
submitted by Progress Land Company requesting a 10' front yard
setback variance for Lots 3-11, Block 3, and a 5' front yard
setback variance for Lot 12, Block 3, to the minimum 30' required
setback to the public right-of-way was requested for the Country
Hollow Addition by Progress Land Company. The builder informed
Progress Land Company that the steep hill on these lots limits
the amount of buildable land. A natural buffer of mature
hardwood trees exists on these lots creating a barrier to Diffley
Road. It was the opinion of the builders that the trees would be
removed to accommodate the homes if normal setbacks are enforced.
The City Council continued this item until the December 6 meeting
allowing Engineering staff an opportunity to evaluate the
variance request and determine whether building pads could be
placed on the platted lots without requiring a variance.
Enclosed is a memo from the Assistant City Engineer to the
Director of Community Development, referenced as pages _33
through `�j� . For additional information refer to the report
prepared for the Advisory Planning Commission and included with
the Novem er 15 packet, which is enclosed on pages,
through
AC:TION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny a
variance submitted by Progress Land Company for a 10' front yard
setback variance for Lots 3-11, Block 3 and a 5' front yard
setback variance for Lot 12, Block 3, to the minimum 30' required
public right-of-way setback in the Country Hollow Addition.
3�
MEMO TO: DALE C RUNKLE, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR
FROM: MICHAEL P FOERTSCH, ASSISTANT CITY ENGINEER
DATE: NOVEMBER 30, 1988
SUBJECT: VARIANCE REQUEST - FRONT YARD SETBACK
LOTS 3-12, BLOCK 3, COUNTRY HOLLOW
On November 16, 1988, Engineering personnel measured the distance
from the property corners of the above -referenced lots (adjacent
to Autumn Oaks Court) to the existing tree line. The
measurements are shown on the attached sketch. As shown, the
distances available for building pads range from a minimum of
approximately 56 feet to a maximum of 83 feet.
There seems to be sufficient distance to construct a home
designed to fit the existing conditions.
Recommendation: There does not appear to be a demonstrated
hardship. If a Variance is allowed, the garages should be
required tdhere to the required 30 foot minimum setback.
As Ata C't Engineer
MPF/jj
cc: Thomas A. Colbert, Director of Public Works
Attachment
5 3
' NL%
{.1N3,1
I 19'S9 5
Ze•Z6
„82'
to? cse
�22bF a`
bL
so se
hN'
2 �Q00
twig h cb•
•^b
wlf y„�/s �..
----- r-,3, '• .g/ N /
-40 a sl, `" r
m o-
ti,,Orn• � Q/
��, zo`29j'ti i
Ate/1 '.8? - .
`_ __.:/ 0
3, �2?,•-k•/o;� ego,
-..-*/
/I ss.e,�,is\p/
:Or "k-tF: •-..
i _ t^ °0j' 0) i
IN'g`/N ^',
1,+i e� N01
1"-' N
0
0
a
rr
MI
=1
e•Pr/ 1
M „ZS,b0.0 14
N1 Z'� ` 48.A8
.00
5` W a`O �I I,'0£,Z�OfV�
N 52.5(S
S0a0 2,5��.p .�//o N 521 bZ' S Z 1 ,'►
158 •, 0 tO el ' 81 L£.4Z -Gt 1
00'S8 -.
'moi'•-'„N-�
1es to
1 OSIsb Ni
ZL' 9ZZ
I - • 00Ob'
O 2 CO h ., o 1 ,1 1££'84 0►c
1 1
00'06Z Z I_ _
M „Z9,40.0 N' _ _--....--71'
QP�O /
i 4f
01
fo:ti ,
0
0
ui
co
4.
' Ln
ti 1O; � OI
� co
M 1
x•00'0017 I
00'06Z
M„ZSR b0.0 N
m1,11, S/e �D‘
roti of ,R
ss.zzz
Sbe°/ de.
WI
SZ
Z
1--
4
SZ
1 C4' C9
1•
` v
N -
13Z1761
„ZS,40.0 N
CO
00'Z61
0)
_Z61_
,b0.0 N
LJ
Cr'
cj
W
)-
Lu
-
- ()
tL to
6 0
1n 1.22
o013
M Z
C;
z
a
Vi
i 1 t 1
lV
iY,
N
1
11
I
A Z6•S01
ZTOSI
9b'S1Z
34
CITY OF EAGAN
SUBJECT: VARIANCE
APPLICANT: PROGRESS LAND CO, INC
LOCATION: LOTS 3 THROUGH 11, BLOCK 3,
LOT 12, BLOCK 3, COUNTRY HOLLOW
EXISTING ZONING: R-1 (SINGLE-FAMILY)
DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: NOVEMBER 10, 1988
DATE OF REPORT: NOVEMBER 9, 1988
REPORTED BY: PLANNING DEPARTMENT
APPLICATION SUMMARY
An application has been submitted by Progress Land Company, Inc.
reguesting a 10' front yard setback Variance for lots 3, 4, 5, 6,
7, 8, 9, 10, and 11, block 3 and a 5' front yard setback Variance
for lot 12, block 3 to the minimum 30' required setback from the
public right-of-way.
COMMENTS
The applicant is requesting this Variance to allow for the
building of single-family homes on the above-mentioned lots.
Progress Land Company has indicated that there are natural
barriers existing on the lots that would prevent single-family
homes from being built if they were made to comply with the code
requirements involving setbacks.
The builder has indicated to Progress Land Company that the steep
hill on these lots limits the amount of buildable land. A
natural buffer of mature hardwood trees exists on these lots,
,creating a barrier to Diffley Road. Trees would have to be
removed to accommodate the homes if the builder was required to
adhere to the normal setbacks.
If approved, this Variance shall be subject to all applicable
code requirements.
(1)
A
,LANESOE PARK
...
Agenda Information Memo
December 6, 1988, City Council Meeting
REZONING/WELL #13
C. Rezoning of Lot 11, Block 1, Thomas Lake Center Addition from
SF to PF for Well #13--A public hearing was held by the Advisory
Planning Commission at their October 25, 1988, meeting to
consider both the comprehensive guide plan amendment and rezoning
to allow for the construction and installation of Well #13 on Lot
11, Block 1, Thomas Lake Center Addition. Following that
meeting, it was discovered that individuals within 350' of the
subject property did not receive written notice. The public
hearing was again rescheduled before the Advisory Planning
Commission for the November 22 meeting and proper notification
was given to all residents. The APC is recommending approval.
For a copy of the Community Development and Engineering
Department's reports, refer to pages 3'7 through L/,Z..
For a copy, the APC minutes on this item, refer to pages 43
through (4 q
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON TRIS ITEM: To approve or deny 1) a
Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment and 2) the Rezoning from
Single Family (SF) to Public Facility (PF) to allow for
construction of Well #13.
3
CITY OF EAGAN
SUBJECT: COMPREHENSIVE GUIDE PLAN AMENDMENT -
REZONING
APPLICANT: CITY OF EAGAN
LOCATION: LOT 11, BLOCK 1, THOMAS LAKE ADDITION
EXISTING ZONING: R-1 (SINGLE FAMILY)
DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: OCTOBER 25, 1988
DATE OF REPORT: OCTOBER 18, 1988
REPORTED BY: PLANNING & ENGINEERING DEPARTMENTS
APPLICATION SUMMARY: An application has been submitted
requesting a Rezoning of Lot 11, Block 1, Thomas Lake Addition,
to a PF (Public Facility) district for a City well located at the
northeast intersection of Lake Park Drive and Cliff Road. A
Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment will also be necessary for
this facility.
The well itself will be 500' deep and capable of pumping 1200-
1400 gallons per minute. Construction will begin as soon as
possible and it is anticipated that the well will be fully
operational by May 1989. Site grading was done with the Pilot
Knob, Cliff Road improvement project. Neighborhood meetings have
been held and the City is aware of the area residents concern of
the appearance of this site. Rendered site plans/elevations will
be presented to the APC/Council and the Director of Public Works
will be available to answer any specific questions about this
project. The City will make a strong effort to architecturally
blend this building into the surrounding area and provide a solid
landscape plan with an underground irrigation system.
DMO1J-99464\99464\64\
J
0
D _< O
0 —0 rri
D
z0�
m
z r
z z
�o 0
o cn
D CT1 W
O
0 0
0 0
3,
3"
C
A -<
cn
0
m
CO
Z
0
III' DP
/
A
/
L''
/
/
•
F;
/
/
/y /
LAKE PARK DRIVE
/
w as
-------
a
z
0
(.5
\\o
\\e
o \\
a
zi
9r
).
4
0
\AA
.9; •
j: kr, /1,;likKkk12 r.
V • A It'
rel
tlIsLAK • '4' ;
V twk-; -•tif
f0.41., ••'0
Hick*,
EbticE
g
_,
pARK7ft"7/
„,...7.----.—.---
i- 1 -• S' "...::•L -'2 Ir., .::5
- __-1,. ,1 rf,...T.He :i.f\l. •1',....,,,....1 c;Lp
COuRSt
• , 1 • ..• • --. -'' ;
-••'---s• .--;-i; -;;-; ....f;„_." ..;,,,• \;,,,
77 ,
t. -,=-----,-777.-3,73---.-7."•—•
0 _ t•-''"
•-•••-'"' ;:•-74',.. ..:,,c7; • J i CA•Ci C. .
L --:----,„--------------------,,i__.---,„...:,-;-,---'---------7
. • , , --../"It':::A7,1.; -1;:- . WI, ' ,, ; .;,•-."-- ':-:
1 ie
i „.--- . vi.r.-..40;:1-:2,:c,;,40, , ...... ‘.%:1) '11‘:: ',... .....:',?‘:: ,:', 1: ,,,..,c?._ •11 1;.. IS 7.70- 1•,,,"-',:,,74:..j k...,... l'ii.,2.:,._*..i.. - •
;,„.•-•,-, ,
.4-7777 - •
r2=2".‘ T),CW4S Lk<
D-vr-i • F.°8-2`.-
• '; . 7....1.-sfl;p4 ;
,k ; 7 ;•' '
•
'Jo --1_ 1-t LS.vr\T[QN
c../Nt., O 41' .-4-04
= DEDQ
1 1
EEO
QQ
NMI
--1
WST-ELEVP\r10 N
5CA1_� Y4 = I OII
Ir-- J
i1
£
1-1-1 ^ LI Cil
-66. -Ave
-P i ELEVRrl 0 ,1
Page 10/PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES
October 25, 1988
rned that matter. Public Works Director Tom Colbert informed the
Commis i.on that proposed condition number 2 could be deleted.
Trygg moved, -Wilkins seconded, the motion to close the public
hearing and approve the.__re-zoning of 1.5 agricultural acres to a
single family district in -the Thomas G. Slater Addition. All voted in
favor.
Trygg moved, Wilkins seconded, the motion to approve a
preliminary plat consisting of two lots located north of Rusten Road
and Storland Avenue in, the southwest quarter.._ of Section 31, subject
to the standard conditions of plat approval as -adopted by Council
action on September 15, 1987, shall be complied with: Bl, B2, B3,
B4, Cl, C2 C5, D1, El, Fl, and Gl. All voted in favor._
THOMAS LAZE ADDITION - CITY OF EAGAN
Chairman Pawlenty opened the public hearing regarding the
re -zoning of Lot 11, Block 1, Thomas Lake Center Addition from single
family to public facility for Well No. 13 located at the northeast
intersection of Lake Park Drive and Cliff Road in the southeast
quarter of Section 28.
Public Works Director Tom Colbert gave an historical update on
the City water plans and recapped the history of the site plan.
Commissionmember Wilkins questioned the landscape theme. Mr.
Colbert explained the landscaping plan and stated it would be a
prototype of what the City wanted to see in the future. Wilkins
questioned the status of the land on Lexington and Diffley. Mr.
Colbert stated staff was still working to acquire the reservoir
property from HUD.
Voracek moved, Wilkins seconded, the motion to close the public
hearing and approve the re -zoning of Lot 11, Block 1, Thomas Lake
Center Addition from single family to public facility for Well No.
13. All voted in favor.
Voracek moved, Merkley seconded, the motion to approve a
Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment for Lot 11, Block 1, Thomas Lake
Center for Well No. 13 located at the northeast intersection of Lake
Park Drive and Cliff Road in the southeast quarter of Section 28. All
voted in favor.
Commissionmember Merkley commented that the fence had been
knocked over. Mr. Colbert stated staff would check on the matter.
X13
Page 2/ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION
November 22, 1988
RE-ZONING/CITY OF EAGAN/WELL NO. 13
The first public hearing of the evening was convened by Chairman
Pawlenty in regard to the re -zoning of Lot 11, Block 1, Thomas Lake
Addition, from Single Family to Public Facility for Well No. 13
located at the northeast intersection of Lake Park Drive and Cliff
Road in the southeast quarter of Section 28.
Assistant City Planner Jim Sturm informed the Commission that
the re -zoning application was unanimously approved by the APC at its
October 25, 1988 meeting, however, individuals within 350 feet of the
subject property did not receive written notice. He stated the public
hearing was to ensure proper legal notification.
Voracek moved, Wilkins seconded, the motion to close the public
hearing and approve a Comprehensive Guide Plan amendment for Lot 11,
Block 1, Thomas Lake Addition for Well No. 13 located at the
northeast intersection of Lake Park Drive and Cliff Road in the
southeast quarter of Section 28. All voted in favor.
Voracek moved, Trygg seconded, the motion to approve the
re -zoning of Lot 11, Block 1, Thomas Lake Addition, from Single
Family to Public Facility for Well No. 13. All voted in favor.
Commissionmember Graves questioned if the fence that had been
knocked over had been repaired.
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT/FLOUR BIN, INC.
Chairman Pawlenty opened the next public hearing regarding a
conditional use permit to allow on -sale liquor, wine or 3.2 beer in a
Neighborhood Business district located on Lot 1, Block 1, Flour Bin
International 1st Addition, on the southeast corner of Nichols Road
and Cliff Road.
Assistant City Planner Jim Sturm stated that the Flour Bin
Audition was final platted in January of 1985 and there was no
specific conditions regarding liquor use on the lot or.the second lot
which contains the Rocky Rococo's Restaurant. He also stated that the
City's Police Department had begun the liquor license investigation.
The applicant (Lynn Reimer) stated he was willing to work with
the public and the staff.
Commissionmember Wilkins questioned if there was to be a name
change. The applicant stated the name would be changed to J.
Doolittles. Wilkins questioned how the liquor would be dispensed. The
applicant reported that there would be a bar with bar stools and also
bar tables with 126 seats for the eating area. Wilkins stated she
felt there was a state statute dealing with establishments being open
on Sunday and the number of seats. She asked the staff to check on
Agenda Information Memo
December 6, 1988, City Council Meeting
SET DATE AND AMOUNT FOR REFERENDUM TO FINANCE
COMMUNITY CENTER PROJECT
D. Set Date and Amount for Referendum to Finance Community
Center Project --Plans for a Community Center began in 1977/1978
when a 40 acre parcel of land was purchased for the future
construction of a library, police department, city hall and
community center. The Parks Systems Plan completed in 1983, a
master plan for the future acquisition and development of
parkland, park building facilities and other related improvements
identified the need for a community center. Approximately 26
months ago, the Advisory Parks and Recreation Commission at the
direction of the City Council began a study for a community
center. Since that time there have been numerous meetings, an
extensive community survey, selection of an architect to do a
space needs/costs analysis and numerous reviews by "focus
groups," outside consultants and citizens of Eagan in a review
process of a schematic plan for such a facility in Eagan.
The schematic plan developed for the proposed facility is
approximately 103,300 square feet at an estimated construction
cost of $8,191,000 including a construction contingency. Site
costs including utilities, roadways, landscaping, parking and the
related that will serve the community center building and the
entire 40 acres, is estimated at $679,000. All other costs
including equipment, architectural and engineering fees, site
survey reproductions are estimated at approximately $685,000.
At a work session held November 29 the City Council reviewed and
concurred with the allocation of $2,000,000 from its consolidated
debt fund. The City Administrator and Director of Finance have
reviewed the consolidated debt fund with the City's auditors and
have determined that throught good fiscal management and
investment procedures, surplus dollars have been generated and
are deemed as unallocated and should be used for a non-operating
purpose. The community center project which in theory is
available to all residents of the City is a good use for a
portion of the unallocated dollars from the consolidated debt
fund. With the total project cost of $9,555,000 and an overall
project contingency that includes capitalized interest, bond
rating and other expenses, a figure of $9,700,000 less the
$2,000,000 or a bond referendum in the amount of $7.7 million is
recommended.
The date for the community center referendum is recommended as
Tuesday, February 14, 1989.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To authorize February 14,
1989, as the date for a special referendum to consider the
proposed community center project and further that the bond
referendum amount be designated at $7.7 million. The Director of
Finance and City Attorney will prepare the formal question for
the referendum.
�5
Agenda Information Memo
December 6, 1988, City Council Meeting
NEW: BUSINESS
SOLID WASTE CODE AMENDMENT
A. City Code Amendments, Section 6.37 and 10.01/Solid Waste
Recycling --At the Solid Waste Abatement Commission meeting held
on November 8, 1988, a recommendation was made to the City
Council to amend City Code sections 6.37 and 10.01 concerning
solid waste and recycling. The amendments specifically address
curbside recycling, same day collection and volume based fees for
licensed Eagan haulers. A copy of the draft code revisions were
distributed as a part of the informative memo for your review in
mid-November. At the last City Council meeting held on November
15, there were no comments or suggestions made by the City
Council, therefore, the draft ordinance was sent to the City
Attorney's office for final review.
The ordinance amendment as finalized by the City Attorney's
office is enclosed on pages L4-1 through _S5 for your
review.
Administrative Assistant Hohenstein has outlined the essential
elements of the ordinance amendment and they are as follows:
1) Require that licensed haulers provide curbside recycling
service of aluminum and steel beverage cans, glass and newsprint
from all single family, duplex and fourplex residences in the
City. 2) Offer volume based fee service to permit residents to
pay lower rates if they reduce the amount disposed either by
waste reduction or recycling. 3) Require same day collection of
all wastes and recyclables within daily hauling districts
previously approved by Council action. 4) To require accurate
reporting of volumes abated for certification to county, region
and state programs.
At the request of the hauling community, the staff would request
that the Council consider two separate actions. One with
specific regard to provisions of Code section 6.37 subd. 4D which
pertains to prior approval of hauler rates. This provision has
been part of the City Code for a number of years. All haulers
have submitted rate schedules at the time of license approval,
but the City has not enforced this provision as it pertains to
actual approval of rates for review and approval of rate changes
during the license period. The hauling community feels that this
provision is unnecessarily restrictive, particularly in light of
the rapid change which is occurring in industry and with landfill
rates increasing on a regular basis. The haulers have asked the
Council to consider specific removal of the prior approval
language of the City Code with the understanding that the Code
would continue to require prior notice of rate structures and
Agenda Information Memo
December 6, 1988, City Council Meeting
rate changes to allow enforcement of the volume based fee
requirement. Therefore, the staff is asking that a separate
action item within the consideration of approval of the overall
ordinance amendment be considered. The Solid Waste Abatement
Commission is recommending removal of prior approval language and
insertion of the prior notice language as it appears in the
amendment.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: 1) To approve or deny that
portion of the proposed amendment to City Code section 6.37 subd.
4D pertaining to prior approval of hauler rates by Council action
and 2) to approve or deny amendments to City Code section 6.37
and 10.01 regarding solid waste management and recycling
requirements.
Lrl
MEMORANDUM
TO: Jon Hohenstein, Assistant City Administrator
FROM: Joe Earley, Assistant City Attorney
DATE: November 30, 1988
RE: Garbage Hauler License Requirements
Our File No.: 206-5943 (OOE)
Enclosed are the ordinance amendments to Chapter 6 and Chapter 10 of
the Eagan City Code. They have been put into final form for review by
the City Council.
These final form ordinances have incorporated the changes which you
made and sent to us for review. If you wish to have any corrections
or changes made, please do not hesitate to contact us.
Thanks, Jon.
JPE/djk
cc: Tom Hedges, Eagan City Administrator
g'g
ORDINANCE NO. 2ND SERIES
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EAGAN, MINNESOTA, AMENDING EAGAN CITY
CODE CHAPTER 6 ENTITLED "OTHER BUSINESS REGULATION AND LICENSING" BY
►MENDING SECTION 6.37 REGARDING GARBAGE, REFUSE AND RECYCLING
HAULERS; AND BY ADOPTING BY REFERENCE EAGAN CITY CODE CHAPTER 1 AND
SECTION 6.99.
The City Council of the City of Eagan does ordain:
Section 1. Chapter 6 of the Eagan City Code is hereby amended to read
as follows:
SEC 6.37. GARBAGE, REFUSE AND RECYCLING HAULERS
Subd. 1. Definitions. The following terms, as used in this
Section, shall have the meanings stated:
A. "Garbage" means all putrescible wastes, including
animal offal and carcasses of dead animals but excluding human
excreta, sewage and other water -carried wastes.
B. "Other Refuse" means ashes, non -recyclable glass,
crockery, cans, paper, boxes, rags and similar nonputrescible wastes
but excluding sand, earth, brick, stone, concrete, trees, tree
branches and wood.
C. "Recyclables" means materials which may be recycled
or reused through recycling processes including targeted recyclables.
D. "Targeted Recyclables" means metal beverage
containers, glass, newsprint, or other materials as may be defined by
Council resolution.
E. "Yard Waste" means leaves and grass clippings or
other materials as may be defined by Council resolution.
F. "Residential Dwelling" - Any single building
consisting of one through four dwelling units with individual kitchen
facilities for each.
G. "Multiple Residential Dwelling" - Any building used
for residential purposes consisting of more than four dwelling units
with individual kitchen facilities for each.
H. "Commercial Establishment" - Any premises where a
commercial or industrial enterprise of any kind is carried on, and
shall include restaurants, clubs, churches, and schools where food is
prepared or served.
1-n
I. "Special Pick -Up" means any collection of materials
other than garbage, other refuse, recyclables or yard waste including
white goods, furniture, oversized materials and construction debris.
J. "Daily Hauling District" means a residential area
in which garbage, other refuse, recyclables and yard waste are
collected on the same day, the boundaries ana day of collection of
which are defined by Council action.
Subd. 2. License Required. It is unlawful for any person to
haul garbage, other refuse or recyclables for hire without a license
therefore from the City, or to haul garbage, other refuse or
recyclables from his own residence or business property other than as
herein excepted.
A. It is unlawful for any person or business to
scavenge or otherwise collect garbage, other refuse, recyclables or
yard waste at the curb or from recyclable containers without a
license therefore from the City and an account relationship with the
owner of the premises.
Subd. 3. Exception. Nothing in this Section shall prevent
persons from hauling garbage, other refuse or recyclables from their
own residences or business properties provided the following rules
are observed: 1) that all garbage is hauled in containers that are
water -tight on all sides and the bottom and with tight -fitting covers
on top, 2) that all other refuse and recyclables are hauled in
vehicles with leak -proof bodies and completely covered or enclosed by
canvas or other means or material so as to completely eliminate the
possibility of loss of cargo, 3) that all garbage and other refuse
shall be dumped or unloaded only at the designated sanitary land -fill
or County designated facility, 4) that recyclables may be disposed of
at a recycling facility, an organized recyclable drive or through a
licensed recyclable hauler, and, 5) that yard waste may be composted
privately or be disposed of at a composting facility or through a
licensed refuse hauler or recyclable hauler.
Subd. 4. Hauler Licensee Requirements.
A. Hauler licenses shall be granted only upon the
condition that the licensee have water -tight packer -type vehicles or,
in the case of recycling haulers, appropriate container vehicles in
good condition to prevent loss in transit of liquid or solid cargo,
that the vehicle be kept clean and as free from offensive odors as
possible and not allowed to stand in any street longer than
reasonably necessary to collect garbage, other refuse, yard waste or
recyclables.
-2-
5.V
1. There shall be three license categories
defined by the type of account served: 1) Commercial/Multiple
Dwelling, 2) Residential Dwelling and 3) Residential Recycling.
2. Commercial/Multiple Dwelling and Residential
Dwelling hauling licenses include Residential Recycling licenses.
a. Residential Recycling licensees may only
collect recyclables as defined herein.
3. Residential Dwelling hauling licensees shall
make curbside recycling collection available to all Residential
Dwelling accounts no later than March 13, 1989. At a minimum, such
service shall include all targeted recyclables as defined herein.
4. Residential Dwelling hauling licensees shall
separately collect and dispose of yard waste for a minimum of eight
weeks in the spring commencing on April 1 and eight weeks in the fall
commencing on September 15.
5. Residential Dwelling hauling licensees shall
make weekly collection of separated garbage and other refuse, yard
waste and recyclables for all Residential Dwelling Accounts within
the daily hauling districts as defined by Council action.
a. It shall be unlawful for refuse vehicles
to operate on residential streets in such districts on any other day,
except to collect a missed pick up, special pick-up or when an
observed holiday falls within that week.
B. Before a garbage and refuse hauler or recycling
license shall be issued, the applicant shall file with the City
Clerk -Treasurer evidence that he has provided public liability
insurance on all vehicles in at least the sum of $100,000.00 for
injury of one person, $300,000.00 for the injury of two or more
persons in the same accident, and $50,000.00 for property damages.
C. The Council, in the interest of maintaining
healthful and sanitary conditions in the City, hereby reserves the
right to specify and assign certain areas to all licensees, and to
limit the number of licenses issued.
D. Each applicant shall file with the City
Clerk -Treasurer, before a garbage and refuse hauler or recycling
license is issued or renewed, a schedule of proposed rates to be
charged by him during the licensed period for which the application
is made. Every licensee shall provide prior notification of any
change in rates to be implemented during the licensed period.
-3-
SI
1. Residential Dwelling hauling licensees rates
shall include a minimum of two levels of regular service, priced on
the basis of volume.
E. no hauler operating on a route in a residential
district shall operate a truck on any City street when the weight of
said vehicle exceeds eight tons per axle.
F. No hauler shall operate in a residential district
after 8:30 o'clock P.M. or before 6:30 o'clock A.M. of any day, and
no hauler shall operate in a residential district on Sunday.
G. Each vehicle for which a haulers license is issued
shall exhibit such license in a prominent position on said vehicle.
H. All Residential Dwelling, Commercial/Multiple
Dwelling, and Recycling Hauling licensees shall report to the City,
on the form provided for such purpose, the quantity of all
recyclables and yard waste abated from the landfills. Such quantities
shall be reported by tonnage, with the exception that yard waste may
be reported in estimates of cubic yardage abated. Failure to certify
accurate volumes in a timely manner may be cause for revocation of
hauling license.
Section 2. Eagan City Code Chapter 1 entitled "General Provisions and
Definitions Applicable to the Entire City Code Including 'Penalty for
Violation'" and Section 6.99, entitled "Violation a Misdemeanor" are
hereby adopted in their entirety by reference as though repeated
verbatim.
Section 3. Effective Date. This ordinance shall take effect upon its
adoption and publication according to law.
ATTEST: CITY OF EAGAN
City Council
By: By:
Its: Clerk Its: Mayor
Date Ordinance Adopted:
Date Ordinance Published in the Legal Newspaper:
-4-
ORDINANCE NO. 2ND SERIES
AN CRDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EAGAN, MINNESOTA, AMENDING EAGAN CITY
CODE CHAPTER 10 ENTITLED "PUBLIC PROTECTION, CRIMES AND OFFENSES" BY
AMEICDING SECTION 10.01 REGARDING STORAGE, DEPOSIT AND DISPOSAL OF
REFUSE; AND BY ADOPTING BY REFERENCE EAGAN CITY CODE CHAPTER 1 AND
SECTION 10.99.
The City Council of the City of Eagan does ordain:
Section 1. Chapter 10 of the Eagan City Code is hereby amended to
read as follows:
SECTION 10.01. STORAGE, DEPOSIT AND DISPOSAL OF REFUSE
Subd. 1. Definitions. The following terms, as used in this
Section, shall have the meanings stated:
A. "Garbage" means all putrescible wastes, including
animal offal and carcasses of dead animals but excluding human
excreta, sewage and other water -carried wastes.
B. "Other Refuse" means ashes, non -recyclable glass,
crockery, cans., paper, boxes, rags and similar nonputrescible wastes
but excluding sand, earth, brick, stone, concrete, trees, tree
branches and wood.
C. "Recyclables" means materials which may be recycled
or reused through recycling processes.
D. "Yard Waste" - Leaves and grass clippings or other
materials as may be defined by Council resolution.
E. "Residential Dwelling" - Any single building
consisting of one through four dwelling units with individual kitchen
facilities for each.
F. "Multiple Dwelling" - Any building used for
residential purposes consisting of more than four dwelling units with
individual kitchen facilities for each.
G. "Commercial Establishment" - Any premises where a
commercial or industrial enterprise of any kind is carried on, and
shall include restaurants, clubs, churches, =and schools where food is
prepared or served.
5 3
H. "Association" - All cooperative organizations of
residential dwelling owners formed for the purpose of joint
management of property or services.
Subd. 2. Storage.
A. It is unlawful for any person to store garbage or
other refuse on residential dwelling premises for more than one week.
All such storage shall be in water -tight, metal or plastic containers
of riot less than five gallons with tight -fitting covers, which shall
be maintained in a clean and sanitary condition; provided, that yara
wastes may be stored in biodegradable plastic bags and tree limbs
must be stored in bundles weighing no more than sixty pounds and no
longer than four feet.
B. It is unlawful for any person to store garbage or
other refuse on multiple dwelling premises for more than one week.
Such storage shall be in containers as for residential dwelling
premises, except that so-called "dumpsters" with close -fitting covers
may be substituted.
C. It is unlawful for any person to store garbage or
other refuse on commercial establishment premises for more than
forty-eight hours. Such storage shall be in containers as for
residential dwelling premises, except that so-called "dumpsters" with
close -fitting covers may be substituted.
Subd. 3. Deposit. It is unlawful for any person to deposit
garbage or other refuse from any source, in any place other than a
sanitary landfill or County designated facility.
Subd. 4. Fire Danger. It is unlawful for any person to
store, deposit or dispose of any garbage or other refuse which is in
flames or heated to the point where it could cause danger of fire in
other refuse.
Subd. 5. Disposal. The Council may, by resolution, adopt,
and from time to time amend, adjust and revise such rules,
regulations, rates and charges as it deems necessary or proper for
the operation and management of the sanitary landfill. It may give
notice of any such action as it deems necessary.
Subd. 6. Joint Management Hauling Contracts. Occupants of
residential dwelling properties jointly managed by associations or
others shall have the same opportunity to recycle afforded to
occupants of other residential dwelling units. It is unlawful for any
Residential Dwelling association or other- Residential Dwelling joint
management entity to negotiate, execute or maintain a contract for
residential garbage or other refuse collection unless they include as
a part of that contract, or as part of a separate contract, weekly
-2-
5 (i
collection of recyclables occuring on the same day as their refuse
collection.
Section 2. Eagan City Code Chapter 1 entitled "General Provisions and
Definitions Applicable to the Entire City Code Incluaing 'Penalty tor
Violation'" and Section 10.99, entitled "Violation a Misdemeanor" are
hereby adopted in their entirety by reference as though repeated
verbatim.
Section 3. Effective Date. This ordinance shall take effect upon its
adoption and publication according to law.
ATTEST: CITY OF EAGAN
City Council
By: By:
Its: Clerk Its: Mayor
Date Ordinance Adopted:
Date Ordinance Published in the Legal Newspaper:
-3-
SS
Agenda Information Memo
December 6, 1988, City Council Meeting
RATIFICATION OF POSITION STATEMENT
AIRPORT ADEQUACY STUDY
B. Ratification of Position Statement Regarding Metropolitan
Council Airport Adequacy Study --At the November 22 City Council
work session, Chauncey Case, a representative of the Metropolitan
Council, and members of the Airport Relations Committee met with
the City Council and discussed the recent Met Council Airport
Adequacy Study. There is a general consensus regarding the
position of the City relative to the Airport Adequacy Study
expressed by both members of the City Council and Airport
Relations Committee. The Airport Relations Committee was asked
to prepare a recommendation, a copy is outlined in Administrative
Assistant Hohenstein's memo, referenced as page `j The City
Council should note that the Committee's recommendation includes
an amendment to the specific direction the Council and Committee
discussed at the joint meeting. Please refer to points 4 and 5
in Jon's memo.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the
proposed position statement regarding the Metropolitan Council
Airport Adequacy Study with or without the additional
recommendations of the Airport Relations Committee.
MEMO TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES
ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT HOHENSTEIN
NOVEMBER 28, 1988
AIRPORT RELATIONS COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION -
METROPOLITAN COUNCIL AIRPORT ADEQUACY STUDY
Following the joint City Council/Airport Relations Committee
meeting of Tuesday, November 22, 1988, members of the Airport
Relations Committee met briefly to consider a recommendation to
the City Council regarding comment on the Met Council Airport
Adequacy Study.
As had been discussed with the City Council, it was the concensus
of those present that the City should:
1. Endorse the Metropolitan Council Task Force's Two -Track
Approach which would permit consideration of expansion
of capacity at the current airport, while property is
identified and banked for a potential future airport.
Such endorsement contigent upon the exclusion of the
third parallel runway, known in the study as the "far
parallel."
2. Insist that the environmental reviews of both the
proposed Runway 4/22 Extension and the proposed
North/South Runway be exhaustive, both in terms of
identification and mitigation of impacts.
3. Demand that expansion of capacity at the current
airport be managed in such a manner as to utilize the
noise abatement capacity of the Eagan -Mendota Heights
Corridor as it is currently defined by the Metropolitan
Council Aircraft Noise Policy Contours. Further that
Metropolitan Policy be amended to provide for
compensation for communities and/or property owners in
the event that impact areas broaden, expand or shift as
a result of operational changes at MSP.
In addition, the Committee recommended that the City Council
should:
4. Support expansion of MSP capacity only as necessary to
meet demand until a replacement airport can be built.
5. Support an acceleration of the land-bank/development
process for a replacement airport to the extent
possible.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the
proposed position statement regarding the Metropolitan Council
Airport Adequacy Study with or without the additional
recommendations of the Airport Relations Committee.
Let me know if you have any questions in this regard.
57
Agenda Information Memo
December 6, 1988, City Council Meeting
VARIANCE/SONS CONSTRUCTION COMPANY
C. Variance for Sons Construction Company, Inc., Requesting a
13' Variance to the Required 50' Public Right -of -Way Setback to
Allow a Three Season Porch --A variance application from Sons
Construction Company requesting a 13' variance to the 50' setback
along Galaxie Road was received and processed by the Community
Development Department.
Fgr1a• copy of the staff report, refer to pages �� through
ACTION.TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny a 13'
variance to the 50' setback along Galaxie Road as requested by
Sons Construction Company, Inc.
S�
CITY OF EAGAN
SUBJECT: VARIANCE
APPLICANT: SONS CONSTRUCTION COMPANY
LOCATION: LOT 1, BLOCK 1, SAFARI ESTATES ADDITION
EXISTING ZONING: R-1 (SINGLE-FAMILY)
DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: DECEMBER 6, 1988
DATE OF REPORT: NOVEMBER 29, 1988
REPORTED BY: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
APPLICATION SUMMARY
An application has been submitted requesting a 13' Variance to
the required 50' setback along Galaxie Avenue.
COMMENTS
Sons Construction Company is requesting a 13' Variance to the
required 50' minimum setback along Galaxie Avenue to alleviate
difficult building restrictions on this site. The applicant
feels that to provide the type of house which would fit the
characteristics of the neighborhood, the 50' half right-of-way is
excessive and restricts building. The majority of the structure
which would encroach the setback is a three -season porch set on
post footings.
The proposed site plan indicates that a 37' setback from the
property line combined with the approximately 26' boulevard
positions the house 63' from the curb of Galaxie Avenue. The
proposed Variance request does not encroach on any existing or
anticipated future public utlility easement or street right-of-
way requirements.
Two developments to the north of the site, Berkshire Ponds and
Park Ridge Addition, have allowed 40' setbacks from Galaxie
Avenue. At the October 15, 1985 City Council meeting, approval
was granted to allow a 6' Variance to the 50' setback on lot 1,
block 1, Safari Estates Addition just to the south of this site.
The Variance request meets or exceeds all other setback
requirements and the required findings as set forth in
section 11.40, subdivision 3.B.4 and 3.0 of the City Code.
S.
+92
i
JN j\
D�•v �
//
1111 a•
V. /4 SF
589'50.22E 51259
268 21
�., iii
32 2
efu u MEM
k11 Al 1 /1
I'959 1/ `T
034-
9 48 04'
948
4:J9°a !1 01ST
6, D6
5392
244.38
0
3 '� w
N 'v
4f
PROPOSED SITE
4
3
95
COUNTY Of Dor
olo-el
bOP
pv
py1 O•Q pti
.15115
likor
,n
764'92 Al
R 40141
T
16
4
n� 4•
f
10
,•
31
4
21 9/
308 84
N 11.22'31•'4,
6
4244J`Wl6
7
63.6085
yE.t04.
N�p1,68oy,
6
/' /
la O
COUNTY Of
dd-QUI
TRI -LAND CO.
SURVEYING
SERVICES
1260 YANKEE DOODLE ROAD
EAGAN, MINNESOTA 55126
SITE PLAN FOR:
SONS CONSTRUCTION
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT L ,BLOCK 1 , SAFARI ADDITION
ACCORDING TO THE RECORDED PLAT
THEREOF DAKOTA COUNTY,MINNESOTA
5251. 6..::
g6
LEGEND
o DENOTES IRON MONUMENT
DENOTES WOOD HUB SET
DENOTES EXISTING SPOT
ELEVATION
DENOTES PROPOSED SPOT
ELEVATION
DENOTES DRAINAGE DIRECTION
1
Scale: I"=30'
PROPOSED SPLIT LEVEL - WITH WALKOUT
INVERT ELEVATION AT SERVICE EXTENSION=
PROPOSED GARAGE FLOOR ELEVATION=
PROPOSED FIRST FLOOR ELEVATION =
PROPOSED BASEMENT FLOOR.
ELEVATION
NOTE'. VERIFY ALL FLOOR HEIGHTS WITH
FINAL HOUSE PLANS
I hereby certify that this survey, plan or
report was prepared by me or under my
direct supervision and that I am a duly
Registered Land Surveyor under the
Laws of the State of Minnesota.
Bradley J. Swenson, Mn. Req. No. 15235
Date: 1' ".'
Agenda Information Memo
December 6, 1988, City Council Meeting
1989 FEE SCHEDULE
D. Consideration of 1989 Fee Schedule --Each calendar year the
fee schedule for numerous services, licenses and permits that are
provided by the City of Eagan are reviewed and periodically
changes are recommended for certain fee amounts. The Director of
Finance has coordinated with all City departments the new fee
schedule for 1989. The fee schedule does not include assessment
rates or utility billing rates. Both are under review and study
by our consulting and engineering firm.
Enclosed on pages ip 3 through jJ is a copy of the revised
fee schedule. The new schedule includes all the revised fees and
new fees and to determine what the present fee is, please refer
to the handwritten amount next to the revised fee amount. If an
amount does not have a hand written amount next to it, there is
no change between 1988 and 1989 proposed.
The significant change in the fee structure is building permits
as the final year of a scheduled three year phase-in of the 1985
uniform building code fee schedule is included. Those rates will
increase to approximately 10% from 1988 to 1989. This is a
slightly smaller increase in the first two years. The cost of
water meters has also increased significantly as the City moves
toward implementation of a touch read system to take advantage
of technology to reduce meter reading costs. Certain electrical
inspection fees are increasing substantially as well. There is
also a fee schedule survey included for the inspections
department.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve with or without
modification the proposed 1989 fee schedule.
L9D-
CITY OF EAGAN
FEE SCHEDULE
Effective January 1, 1989
(Utility and Assessment Rates to Change
Pending Completion of Studies)
Adopted December 6, 1988
co3
LIQUOR FEES
FEE TYPE
BEER, LIQUOR AND WINE
Beer
Application and
Investigation
Off -Sale License
On -Sale License
Temporary License
7989
FEE
$350.00(1)
40.00
175.00
25.00
Liquor
Application and
Investigation 300.00(2)
Off -Sale License 200.00
On -Sale License 3,500.00
Sunday License 200.00
On -Sale Club License
Less than 200 300.00
201-500 500.00
501-1,000 650.00
1,001-2,000 800.00
2,001-4,000 1,000.00
4,001-6,000 2,000.00
Over 6,000 3,000.00
Wine
Application and
Investigation 200.00(1)
On -Sale License 200.00
Sunday License 100.00
Consumption and Display
Daily Sports or Convention
Duplicate License
25.00
50.00
2.00
(1)When Wine and Beer are applied for by the same applicant, the
total maximum investigation fee is $350.00.
(2)Also requires an escrow deposit of $1,000.00 for five persons
requiring investigation and $200 for each additional if the
investigation is conducted within Minnesota, or $2,000.00 for
five persons requiring investigation and $400.00 for each
additional if the investigation is conducted outside of
Minnesota. -
1
1989
FEE TYPE FEE
Rubbish Hauler
Commercial, Residential
or Recycling Only
1st Truck
Each Additional
Commercial/Residential
Combination
1st Truck
Each Additional
Service Station
Solicitors (Non -Profit)
Solicitors (For Profit)
License Fee
Trailer Permit
Dog License
Male or Female
Neutered or Spayed
Late Fee
Kennel Permit
Initial
Renewal
Photocopies
Fee Schedule
Animal Pick Up
Animal Impound
$40.00
20.00
60.00
30.00
50.00
25.00
Q,,) o
\0,5
r
50.00 Investigation
25.00 up to 3 solicitors
5.00 each additional
over 3
25.00
6.00
3.00
2.00 a
50.00
25.00
.50/page
2.00
10.00
torvpv%
4.00/day over amount
billed the City by
the animal pound
Permit Duplication Fee 20.00
Returned Check Fee 10.00
False Alarm
Commercial 75.00 Per False Alarm
After 6 (City Code)
Residential 50.00 Per False Alarm
After 6 (City Code)
2
FEE TYPE
Alarm Panel
Parade Permit Fee
Shows (circus, carnival,
Massage Parlor License
Masseur/Masseuse License
Accident Photo
Police/Fire Reports:
Accident
Fire
Burglary
1.nc.tde�
Gambling Investigation
Cigarette License
Mechanical Amusement
1-3 Machines
4-15 Machines
15+ Machines
Contractors Licenses
Plumbing
Sewer and Water
Well Driller
Topographic Maps
Mailing Labels
Notary Seal
Voter Certification
Duplicate Certificate of Occupancy
1989
FEE
8.00/month
25.00
etc.) License 25.00
50.00 Investigation
25.00
400.00
50.00
300.00
Investigation
/ q -v3
Investigation
Qd .
5.00/print (F:.si 5)
.0o/Q•: ; ��•��..<���
3.00
.50
4.00 first 2 pages
.25/additional page
250.00
25.00
25.00
200.00
400.00
MN Master License No.
& $2,000 Bond &
Certificate of Insurance
MN Master License No.
& $2,000 Bond &
Certificate of Insurance
MN Master License No.
& $2,000 Bond &
Certificate of Insurance
6.30/Acre
LOGIS Cost + $10.00
3
Ci2(p
.50
1.00
5.00
VIk
SUBDIVISION AND PLATTING
FEE TYPE
Final Plat
Preliminary Plat
Rezoning and Planned Dev.
PD -Annual Review
1989
FEE
$100.00
+$3/lot
300.00
250.00
25.00
Conditional Use Permit Initial 150.00
Renewal - CUP 25.00
Variance
Waiver of Plat Duplex Lot Splits
Others
Special Permit
Accessory Housing Permit
Grading/Excavation Permits
If Preliminarily Platted
Not Preliminarily Platted
Renewal
Utility Permits
Utility Companies
Permit For Construction
in City Right -of -Way
Assessment Search
Vacation Proceedings
Industrial Revenue Bond and
Multifamily Housing Bond
Processing Fee
Market Analysis Study
Zoning Map
Zoning Regulations (City Code -
Chapter 11)
4
75.00
50.00
300.00
50.00
100.00
Require Escrow
Deposits Per
Development
Escrow Policy
250.00
325.001 (` A ckci%s s
150.00 3 „...,ALQ
10.00
20.00
8.00
300.00
tea-
L
500.00
50.00 New i2v QArevous
5.00 C -c47, u. ,mac.. 1 fk�-h ; o h
10.00
FEE TYPE
1989
FEE
Subdivision Regulations (City Code -
Chapter 13) 10.00
Traffic Regulations
Chapter 8)
Parking Regulations
Chapter 9)
Sign Regulations
City Code Each Chapter (All
Chapters Except 8,9,11,13)
Code Book
Code Book with Binder
City Code Updates
(City Code -
(City Code -
5
3.00
3.00
2.50
5.00
60.00
75.00
10.002vJ
INSPECTION FEES
FEE TYPE
Building Permit
Demolition Permit
D_Lsposal Permit
Electrical Permit
Heating, Ventilating and Air
Conditioning
Moving Permit
Plumbing and Gas Fitting
Sign Permit
Wind Energy, Radio and
Television Tower Permit
Plan Check (Valuation
over $10,000)
Foundation Permit
(]:f issued prior to building
permit - fee is not credited
against the Building Permit
Fee)
6
1989
FEE
See Attached (1985
Uniform Building Code)
15.00
10.00
See Schedule Attached
See Schedule Attached
30.00 Plus Cost of
Repairs and Escrow
See Schedule Attached
2.50 per square foot
See Attached (1985
Uniform Building Code)
50% of Permit Fee
.0005 X Valuation
($500 Maximum)
BUILDING PERMITS
CITY OF EAGAN
1989 PERMIT FEES & LICENSING REQUIREMENTS
PERMIT FEES - RESIDENTIAL - Fees based on 1985 UBC Fee Schedule
50% Plan Review Charge on all permits over $10,000.
Permits are issued to specific lots - any lot change after
issuance of permit $50.00 transfer fee.
Utility Charges - collected with permit fee
Sewer Availability Charge (SAC) - $650.00*
Water Availability Charge (WAC) - $550.00*
Water Meter (5/8") - $ 90.00 ')'Jas
Road Unit Charge - $325.00*
Treatment Plant Charge - $228.00 was 'oy,ob
$1.00 - $500.00 -- No Permit Required
1M.eo
$501.00 - $2,000.00 -- $15.00 for the first $500.00 plus
i,co $2.00 for each additional $100.00 or
fraction thereof, to and including
$2,000.00.
H�.5o
$2,001.00 - $25,000.00 -- $45.00 for the first $2,000.00 plus
goo $9.00 for each additional $1,000.00 or
fraction thereof, to and including
$25,000.00.
1
a�. 50
$25,001.00 - $50,000.00 -- $252.00 for the first $25,000.00 plus
S qo 6.50 for each additional $1,000.00 or
fraction thereof, to and including
$50,000.00.
3�9.00
$50,001.00 - $100,000.00-- $414.50 for the first $50,000.00 plus
9.00 $4.50 for each additional $1,000.00 or
fraction thereof to and including
$100,000.00.
4743910
$100,001.00-$500,000.00 -- for the first $100,000.00 plus
3.95 $3.50 for each additional $1,000.00 or
fraction thereof.
1 g14.00
$500,001.00 - $1,000,000-- $2,039.50 for the first $500,000.00
plus $3.00 for each additional
0O
$1,000.00 or fraction thereof,, to and
including $1,000,000.00.
(Continued)
* Rate to change pending completion of study
7
no
BUILDING PERMITS
CITY OF EAGAN
1989 PERMIT FEES & LICENSING REQUIREMENTS
PERMIT FEES - RESIDENTIAL - Fees based on 1985 UBC Fee Schedule
50% Plan Review Charge on all permits over $10,000.
Permits are issued to specific lots - any lot change after
issuance of permit $50.00 transfer fee.
Utility Charges - collected with permit fee
Sewer Availability Charge (SAC) -
Water Availability Charge (WAC)
Water Meter (5/8")
Road Unit Charge
Treatment Plant Charge
$650.00*
- $550.00*
- $ 90.00
- $325.00*
- $228.00 wnt
vJ o.s
901.00
$1.00 - $500.00 -- No Permit Required
N.00
$501.00 - $2,000.00 -- $15.00 for the first $500.00 plus
\co $2.00 for each additional $100.00 or
fraction thereof, to and including
$2,000.00.
N2.5o
$2,001.00 - $25,000.00 -- $45.00 for the first $2,000.00 plus
goo $9.00 for each additional $1,000.00 or
fraction thereof, to and including
$25,000.00.
¢ S 24..50
$25,001.00 - $50,000.00 -- $252.00 for the first $25,000.00 plus
67A0 6.50 for each additional $1,000.00 or
fraction thereof, to and including
$50,000.00.
374.00
$50,001.00 - $100,000.00-- $414.50 for the first $50,000.00 plus
4,00 $4.50 for each additional $1,000.00 or
fraction thereof to and including
$100,000.00.
519.00
$100,001.00-$500,000.00 -- $639.50 for the first $100,000.00 plus
3.16 $3.50 for each additional $1,000.00 or
fraction thereof.
104.00
$500,001.00 - $1,000,000-- $2,039.50 for the first $500,000.00
plus $3.00 for each additional
0.1:1`' $1,000.00 or fraction thereof, to and
including $1,000,000.00.
(Continued)
* Rate to change pending completion of study
7
90
3,3?4.'0°
$1,000,001.00 and Up -- $3,539.50 for the first $1,000,000.00
„5 plus $2.00 for each additional
d•' $1,000.00 or fraction thereof.
All permit fees are rounded to the nearest numerically even
dollar amount.
FEES FOR APARTMENT BUILDINGS (ONE COMMON ENTRANCE & ONE LAUNDRY
FACILITY)
Sewer Availability Charge (SAC) - 80% of $650* x number of units
Water Availability Charge (WAC) - 80% of $550* x number of units
Road Unit - 80% of $325* x number of units
Treatment Plant Charge - 80% of $228 x number of units
� waa � apy
Accessory buildings in apartment complexes will not pay MWCC SAC
(Per MWCC policy). City SAC, WAC, Road Unit and Water Treatment
will be charged at full value.
STATE SURCHARGE ON ALL BUILDING PERMITS
Valuation of Structure Surcharge
Addition or Alteration
$1,000,000 or Less
$1,000,001 to $2,000,000 $ 500 + .0004
$2,000,001 to $3,000,000 $ 900 + .0003
$3,000,001 to $4,000,000 $1,200 + .0002
$4,000,001 to $5,000,000 $1,400 + .0001
$5,000,001 and Up $1,500 +
Computation
.0005 x Valuation
x (Value
x (Value
x (Value
x (Value
- $1,000,000)
- $2,000,000)
- $3,000,000)
- $4,000,000)
.00005 x (Value - $5,000,000)
* Rate to change pending completion of study
8
RI
1989 CITY OF EAGAN PLUMBING PERMIT FEES
TYPE OF FIXTURE
Water Closet @ $3.00 Each
Bath Tub @ $3.00 Each
Lavatory @ $3.00 Each
Shower (Per Head)
@ $3.00 Each
Sink @ $3.00 Each
Urinal @ $3.00 Each
Bidet @ $3.00 Each
Laundry Tub @ $3.00 Ea.
COMMERCIAL PERMIT FEES:
TYPE OF FIXTURE
Janitor Sink or Receptor @ $3.00 Ea.
Water Heater @ $3.00 Each
Floor Drain @ $1.50 Each
Water Stand Pipe @ $1.50 Each
Gas Pipe Outlets @ $1.50 Each
Rough Openings -No Openings @$1.50 Ea
Fixtures on Rough Openings @$1.50 Ea
1% of Contract Fee With a Minimum
Fee of $20.00. State Surcharge is
$.50 Per Each $1,000 of Fee (Not the
Contract Cost).
$12.00 Minimum Fee
1989 CITY OF EAGAN MECHANICAL PERMIT FEES
RESIDENTIAL HEATING
(Includes Cooling for New
Construction)
RESIDENTIAL COOLING
(Add on)
MODIFICATIONS/ALTERATIONS
COMMERCIAL PERMIT FEES
01-100,000
Additional
Fraction -
$12.00
BTU's -
50,000
$6.00
$12.00 Minimum
$24.00, Each
BTU's or
1% of Contract Fee with a Minimum
Fee of $20.00. State Surcharge is
$.50 Per Each $1,000 of Fee (Not the
Contract Cost)
9
1
CITY OF EAGAN
ELECTRICAL INSPECTION FEES
NOTE: MINIMUM CHARGE FOR EACH INSPECTION - $10.00
ALL PERMITS REQUIRE $.50 STATE SURCHARGE
1. Payment of fees - All electrical inspection fees are due
and payable to the City of Eagan at or before commencement
of the installation and shall be forwarded to the City of
Eagan.
2. The fees for signs shall be computed in accordance with
State schedule with a minimum fee of $15.00 per sign.
wC1.1. 10.0 0
3. Swimming pool ground fees shall be computed separately at
$40.00 per pool.
Wati 30.00
4. Minimum fee for each separate inspection of an installa-
tion, replacement, alteration or repair limited to one
inspection only - $15.00. LUaa lO.00
5. Services, change of services, temporary services,
additions, alterations or repairs on either primary or
secondary services shall be computed separately.
1 to 100 ampere capacity $15.00 was t �.0 0
101 to and including 200 ampere
capacity or fraction thereof $18.00 voct.s tS.o 0
For each addition of 100 amperes
or fraction thereof $ 5.00
6. Circuit, installations or additions, alterations or
repairs of each circuit or subfeeder shall be computed
separately including circuits fed from subfeeders and
including the equipment service. Circuits of 250 volts or
less.
0 to and including 30 ampere capacity $ 4.00 was 3.00
31 to and including 100 ampere capacity $ 7.00 wac S.bO
For each additional 100 ampere capacity or
fraction thereof $ 6.00 Wq,s 4.o b
For circuits over 250 volts, double the fee
for 250 volts or less.
7. In addition to the above fees:
W0.S %.50
a. A charge of $2.00 will be made for each street lighting
standard.
b. A charge of $2.00 will be made for each traffic signal
head. Circuits originating within the standard will
not be used when computing the fee.
10
13
8. In addition to the above fees, all transformers and
generators for lights, heat and power shall be computed
separately at $2.00 per unit plus $.10 per KVA up to and
including 100 KVA, 101 KVA and over at $.05 per KVA. The
maximum fee for any transformer or generator in this
category is $20.00.
9. In addition to the above fees, all transformers for signs
and outline lighting shall be computed at $3.00 for the
first 500 VA or fraction thereof per unit, plus $.25 for
each additional 100 VA or fraction thereof.
10. In addition to the above fees (unless included in the
maximum fee filed by the initial installer), remote
controls, signal circuits, fire warning and security
circuits of less than 50 volts shall be computed at $15.00
per first ten openings or devices of each system plus
$1.00 for each additional opening.
11. For the review of plans and specifications of proposed
installations, there shall be a minimum fee of $100.00 up
to and including $30,000 of electrical estimate, plus 1/10
of 1% on any amount in excess of $30,000 to be paid by
persons or firms requesting the review.
12. When reinspection is necessary to determine whether unsafe
conditions have been corrected and such conditions are not
the subject of an appeal pending before the Board or any
court, a reinspection fee of not to exceed the original
unit fee, or $15.00, whichever is less, may be assessed in
writing by the inspector. Was 10.00
13. For inspections not covered herein, or for requested tea, 6.0
special inspections or services, the fee shall be $25.00
per man hour, including travel time, plus $.20 per mile
traveled, plus the reasonable cost of equipment of
material consumed.
This section is also applicable to inspection of empty
conduits and such other jobs as determined by the
inspector.
14. For inspections of transient project including, but not
limited to, carnivals and circuses, the inspection fees
shall be computed as follows:
a. Power supply units - According to Item 4(b) (2) of fee
schedule - a like fee will be required on power supply
o units at each engagement during the season, except that
\.0° a fee of $25.00 per hour will be charged for additional
time spent by the inspector if -the power supply is not
ready for inspection at the time and date specified on
the request for inspection as required by law.
11
8. In addition to the above fees, all transformers and
generators for lights, heat and power shall be computed
separately at $2.00 per unit plus $.10 per KVA up to and
including 100 KVA, 101 KVA and over at $.05 per KVA. The
maximum fee for any transformer or generator in this
category is $20.00.
9. In addition to the above fees, all transformers for signs
and outline lighting shall be computed at $3.00 for the
first 500 VA or fraction thereof per unit, plus $.25 for
each additional 100 VA or fraction thereof.
10. In addition to the above fees (unless included in the
maximum fee filed by the initial installer), remote
controls, signal circuits, fire warning and security
circuits of less than 50 volts shall be computed at $15.00
per first ten openings or devices of each system plus
$1.00 for each additional opening.
11. For the review of plans and specifications of proposed
installations, there shall be a minimum fee of $100.00 up
to and including $30,000 of electrical estimate, plus 1/10
of 1% on any amount in excess of $30,000 to be paid by
persons or firms requesting the review.
12. When reinspection is necessary to determine whether unsafe
conditions have been corrected and such conditions are not
the subject of an appeal pending before the Board or any
court, a reinspection fee of not to exceed the original
unit fee, or $15.00, whichever is less, may be assessed in
writing by the inspector. Was 10.00
13. For inspections not covered herein, or for requested
special inspections or services, the fee shall be $25.00
per man hour, including travel time, plus $.20 per mile
traveled, plus the reasonable cost of equipment of
material consumed.
This section is also applicable to inspection of empty
conduits and such other jobs as determined by the
inspector.
14. For inspections of transient project including, but not
limited to, carnivals and circuses, the inspection fees
shall be computed as follows:
may
a. Power supply units - According to Item 4(b) (2) of fee
schedule - a like fee will be required on power supply
o units at each engagement during the season, except that
S a fee of $25.00 per hour will be charged for additional
time spent by the inspector if the power supply is not
ready for inspection at the time and date specified on
the request for inspection as required by law.
11
b. Rides, devices or concessions - Shall be inspected at
their first appearance of the season and the inspection
fee shall be $15.00 per unit. W 61,7.So
15. Fees double - When any person, co -partnership or
corporation begin work of any kind such as hereinbefore
set forth, or for which a permit from the electrical
inspector is required by ordinance, without having secured
the necessary permit therefore from the inspector of
buildings either previous to or during the day of the
commencement of any such work, or on the next succeeding
day where such work is commenced on a Saturday or on a
Sunday or a holiday, he shall when subsequently securing
such permit, be required to pay double the fees herein-
before provided for such permit, and shall be subject to
all penal provisions of this ordinance.
16. Additional Fees and/or Fee Shortage - Additional fees
and/or fee shortages must be received by the City within
14 days of written notice. If additional fees and/or fee
shortages are not received within 14 days of notice,
permits for electrical installations will not be accepted
by the City until such time as the additional fees and/or
shortages are received. Additional fees and/or fee
shortages that are not received within 14 days of notice
are subject to a 10% per day penalty.
12
Rates to Change Pending Completion of Study
ASSESSMENT FEES
FEE TYPE
Trunk Assessment
Trunk Sanitary Sewer
Oversize
Unplatted
Platted Residential
Trunk Water Main
Oversize
Unplatted and Platted
Comm. & Ind.
Platted Residential
Water Supply & Storage (WAC)
Comm. & Ind.
Trunk Storm Sewer Oversize
Single Family
Multi -Family
Comm. & Ind.
Lateral Benefit Assessment
Lateral Benefit from
Trunk Sanitary Sewer
Lateral Benefit from
Trunk Water Main
Single Family
Multi -Family and
Comm. & Ind.
Lateral Benefit from
Trunk Storm Sewer
Single Family
Multi -Family
Comm. & Ind.
Street Assessment
Equivalent Zoning
STREET -Residential (Including
Equivalent (32')
Multiple Equivalent (44')
Comm. & Ind. Equivalent (52')
TRAILWAY - (Concrete or
Bituminous)
1988
FEE
$1,365/Ac.
655/Lot
1,315/Ac.
63 0/Lot
2,015/Ac.
.056/S.F.
.070/S.F.
.083/S.F.
31.70/Centerline Foot
26.20/Centerline Foot
43.20/Centerline Foot
41.65/Centerline Foot
52.00/Centerline Foot
61.75/Centerline Foot
Storm Sewer for Street Drainage)
48.05/F.F.
90.20/F.F.
111.70/F.F.
13
(10
13.00/F.F.
Rates to Change Pending Completion of Study
UTILITY RATES AND FEES
FEE TYPE
Sanitary Sewer
Single Family, Townhouse
and Similar Residential
Apartment, Institutional
Commercial & Industrial
Sewer only (Sewer with
water connection/meter to
measure flow)
1988
FEE
MN $18.75/Qtr. for 15,000
Gal. $1.15/1000 Gal. for
All Usage Over 15,000
Gal. Based on Winter
Quarter Meter Reading
MN $18.75/Qtr. for 15,000
Gal. $1.15/1000 Gal. for
all Usage over 15,000 Gal
no Flat Rate - $25.35/Qtr.
Water Works
All users
Street Light Energy
Single Family/Twin Homes
(R-1, R-2)
Townhouses (R-3)
Multiple Residential &
Comm. & Ind. (R-4, C/I)
Road Unit Charge
Residential Except Apartments
Apartments (80%)
Comm. & Ind.
Sewer Availability Charge (SAC)
Single Family (R1 and R2)
Other
Treatment Plant Charge
Water Supply & Storage (WAC)
Single Family
Apartments
Comm. & Ind.
Shut-off Charge
Delivery of Shut-off Notice
14
MN $17.85/Qtr for 15,000
Gal. & $.77/1000 Gal. for
All Usage Over 15,000 Gal
$2.65 Per Qtr Per Lot
$2.10 Per Qrtr Per Unit
$18.40 Per Qrtr Per
Billing Acct.
$325/unit
260/unit
975/acre
$650
MWCC
228.00 (1989 Rate) W q s 0.04.DO
550/Lot
440/unit
2,015/acre
25.00 (1989 Rate)
10.00 (1989 Rate)
1989
FEE TYPE FEE
Late Fee
Sewer Permit
Water Permit
Construction Meter Permit
After Hours Work
Water Meter Removal
Water Meter Replacement
Sewer Tap
Water Tap
Water Meters
5/8" x 3/4" meter*
3/4 water meter*
1" water meter
11/2" water meter
2" water meter
2" compound
3" compound
4" compound
6" compound
2" turbo meter
3" turbo meter
4" turbo meter
6" turbo meter
#2 copperhorn w/swivel
Remote wire (over 35')
Meter Strainers:
2"
3"
4"
10% of Balance
$10.50
10.50
10.00 ($100 Escrow Dep.) °(2.-
A. Call Out - Labor Rate
2.5 Hr. Minimum +
10% Administrative
B. Extended Day
Labor + 10% Admin.
30.00
30.00
100.00
100.00
W 0.S
90.00 to?,ao
120.00 °13.00
125.00 tot..00
325.00 9,3.Oo
455.00 'Moo
970.00
1,205.00 I I I.o.00
1,900.00 ivtt .00
3,620.00 3570.00
475.00 12o.00
639.85 (000.00
1,075.00 1045.00
2,220.00 l P38.00
16.00
0.06/Ft
160.00
207.00
312.00
Meter Testing (Charged only if meter tests correct):
5/8" through 2" 50.00
All other sizes Contract Cost (Mpls)+ 10%
15
X18
PARKS AND RECREATION
FEE TYPE
Parkland Dedication
Single Family
Duplex
Townhouse/Quad
Apartments/Multiple
Commercial and Industrial
Park Fees
Picnic Kit
Rahn Building
Trapp Farm Pavilion
Enclosed Shelter Buildings
Open Shelters
Athletic Facilities/Shelters
Fields
Lights (If Required)
Building Cleaning
Damage Deposit
Community Rooms
Youth and Non -Profit
Others
Profit and Fund Raising
Chuckwagon Grill
Canopy
16
'15
1989
FEE
$525.00
488.00
414.00
427.00
.05/S.F.
3.00/5.00
0.J
y99.0o
(,`1.00
3A(,.00
1,404. 00
.0'46
50.00 Per Day
35.00 1/2 Day
35.00 Was Q.av Atur
15.00
50.
35.00 Per Field Per Day
20.00 Per Field Per Day
30.00
100.00
p0
No Charge
35.00 Was 16,00
50.00
15.00
50.00/Day
4
30.00
4'n h; vr.unn
MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT AND PERSONNEL
1989
FEE TYPE FEE
Maintenance Person $17.00/hr. (Regular)
25.50/hr. (Overtime)
Foreman 20.00/hr.
Pick-up truck 22.00/hr.
1 Ton dump truck 23.00/hr.
Single axle dump truck 30.00/hr.
Tandem axle dump truck 35.00/hr.
Tractor 15.00/hr.
Backhoe/loader 35.00/hr.
Front end loader 56.00/hr.
Road grader 56.00/hr.
Street sweeper 41.00/hr.
Roller 18.00/hr.
Paver 20.00/hr.
Air Compressor 8.00/hr.
50 KW Generator 35.00/hr.
Sewer Jetter 66.00/hr.' s s3.O0
Sewer Rodder 33.00/hr.
Sewer Vacuum 33.00/hr.
Groundsmaster Mower 22.00/hr.
17
ga
EXHIBIT "B"
(Developer's Escrow Agreement)
Preliminary Plat Application Escrow
$150 per acre
$750 Minimum
$2,400 Maximum
Final Plat Application Escrow
$150 per acre
$500 Maximum
Contract Management Escrow
Estimated Construction Costs * Escrow
$ 0 - $150,000 4% ($ 500 Minimum)
$150,001 - $500,000 3% ($ 6,000 Minimum)
$500,001 + 2.5% ($15,000 Minimum)
* Costs will be verified by City staff and adjusted as necessary
to be comparable to City Projects, thereby insuring armslength
transaction costs.
18
Sl
MINIMUM
Service
1 0 to 30 amp 31 to 100 0 to 100
1
Service
101 to 2001
E-+
Z
x
x
U
Q
W E■
Ena.
o
a. U
0
0
=
E-+ W
Z J 0
P4
0
0 w
J)
0
0
C1.
E� W
W 0
o
0 a
West St. Paul
Eagan
Burnsville
Rosemount
Shoreview
No. St. Paul
Roseville
si
$10
1L]
$15
$15
$15
$15
$15
s4 .c5 ..$7_
$4 $5 ($7
$4_ $4 47
ffs
($4
I$5
$5
$5
$6
$7
$7
$7
$ 1 7 .$15 ! $.15
$12 $15 $15 $1R
$4-2
$15
$18
$181
$18
5
$22
Maplewood
$15
$5
$7 ! E $18
$22
Arden Hills
$15
$5
$7
$18
$22
Little Canada
$15
$5
$7
$18
$22
No. Oaks
$15
$5
$7
$18
$22
City Of St. Paul
$20
$4
$7
$15
$20
Minneapolis
Bloomington
$22
$78
$20
$30
$5
$7
$18
$22
i
MEMORANDUM
TO: TOM HEDGES, CITY ADMINISTRATOR
HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
FROM! KEN VRAA, DIRECTOR OF PARKS AND RECREATION
DATE: NOVEMBER 21, 1988
RE: ADVISORY PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION
BACKGROUND
The Advisory Commission annually reviews parks dedication fees and
policy for recommendation and adjustments.
In 1986, the policy underwent significant change, primarily to reflect
the state statutes governing parks dedication, and to better show a
relationship between possible effects of residential "density", park needs
and land or cash dedication.
For 1987 and 1988, the Commission recommended, and the Council
approved, an increase of $500 in land values resulting in the following:
1987 1988
Class Value = Unit Dedication Value = Unit Dedication
Single Family $11,000 = $471 $11,500 = $492
Duplex 13,000 = 445 13,500 = 462
Townhouse 15,000 = 382 15,500 = 396
Apts/Multiple 17,000 = 392 17,500 = 404*
*Apartment fees may be reduced by up to 25%, if the developer provides for
significant recreational facilities for its apartment dwellers.
The Commission discussed their recommendations at the October and
November meeting of the Commission.
ADDITIONAL ISSUE
The Commission, concerned with the long term needs for maintaining
Eagan's urban forest, open space and natural resources have discussed the
concept of creating a "Resource Trust Fund". Proceeds from the fund would
be used to help to promote activities in neighborhood reforestation, etc.
The fund would also be a depository for gifts, grants and donations. The
Commission has yet to finish work on this "idea" before a formal
presentation to the Council. However, the Commission has considered the
creation of this trust fund for inclusions with the parks dedication
fee/formula.
COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION
The Commission has recommended that average land value be found at:
$12,250 for Single Family
$14,250 for Duplex
$16,250 for Townhouse/Quads
$18,500 for Apartments
These values would result in cash dedication equivalents as follows:
Amount Increase/Percentage
Single Family $525.00 $33 6.2%
Duplex 488.00 26 5.2%
Townhouse/Quads 414.00 18 4.5%
Apartments 427.00 23 5.3%
Regarding Commercial/Industrial; the fee would go to $.05 per square
foot of net developable land, an increase from $.046 per square foot.
The Commission also recommended that up to $20.00 from each living
unit be identified/tracked for possible deposit into a separate trust
fundfornatural resources. A report and official recommendation is to
follow in the near future.
FOR COUNCIL ACTION
To approve, or disapprove and revise, the proposed 1989 parks
dedication fee; authorize preparation of a resolution to amend existing
policy.
RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING FEES FOR VARIOUS
CITY SERVICES, SUPPLIES AND MATERIALS
WHEREAS, various sections of the City Code provide
for fees to be established by Council resolution, and
WHEREAS, the City has incurred increased costs in
wages and materials and it is, therefore, necessary to increase
some of the cost to cover said increase; and
NOW, THEREFORE, LET IT BE RESOLVED, that the fees as
1_lsted in the attached shall be effective January 1, 1989,
Motion Made by:
Seconded by:
Those in Favor:
Those Opposed:
Darted: December 6, 1988
CITY OF EAGAN
CITY COUNCIL
BY:
Its Mayor
ATTEST:
Its Clerk
CERTIFICATION
I, E. J. VanOverbeke, Clerk of the City of Eagan,
Dakota County, Minnesota, do hereby certify that the foregoing
resolution was duly passed and adopted by the City Council of the
City of Eagan, Dakota County, Minnesota, in a regular meeting
thereof assembled this 6th date of December, 1988.
E. J. VanOverveke, City Clerk
City of Eagan
S
Agenda Information Memo
December 6, 1988, City Council Meeting
RECEIVE DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT #2 PROGRAM
SET PUBLIC HEARING
E. Receive Development District #2 Program and Set Public
Hearing --The City Council has identified the need to organize a
development district and undertake a development program for the
purpose of carrying out certain transportation improvements
generally described as the commercial/industrial park area in
northeast Eagan. For a copy of Development District #2 or the
project area, refer to the map enclosed on page 27.
For a copy of the development program as referenced in the
statement of intent, statement of need and various program
objectives nd district ctivities, refer to a document enclosed
on pages through .
The action before the City Council is to set a public hearing for
the January 17 City Council meeting for the purpose of
considering development program/development district #2.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny setting
a public hearing for January 17, 1989, to consider Development
District #2 for the purpose of carrying out certain
transportation improvements.
• t-id:ew,6.- W.4
DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM
DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT NO. 2
A. STATEMENT OF INTENT
It is the intent of the City of Eagan to organize a
development district and undertake a development program within
the meaning of Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.124 to 469.134
(the "Development District Act"), and to designate the project
area as Development District No. 2 (the "Development District")
for purposes of carrying out the transportation improvements
hereinafter described and establishing a portion of the project
area as a tax increment financing district pursuant to
Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.174 to 469.179 (the "Tax
Increment Act"), in the financing of the improvements herein
described. The boundaries of Development District No. 2 are as
set forth in Appendix I hereto. In particular, there has been
presented to the City a plan for the construction of certain
transportation improvements in order to induce and permit the
construction of an office building and training center
expansion at the Northwest Airlines headquarters site in
particular and to secondarily induce and permit construction of
other private developments in the District, all for the
purposes of providing employment opportunities and enhancing
the tax base of the City.
B. STATEMENT OF NEED
There is a need for new development in the City to
provide employment opportunities, to increase the tax base and
to improve the general economy of the state and the City. This
need can be accomplished through the attraction of commercial
development. In the case of the District, significant
development can be attracted by the Program described herein.
The action herein proposed to be taken by the City is found to
have a public purpose in accordance with the Development
District Act and is necessary to meet those needs.
The primary commercial development which the City
believes will be attracted as a result of the creation of the
Development District and implementation of the Program is the
expansion of the Northwest Airlines corporate headquarters site
in the City. Northwest Airlines has submitted to the City a
proposed amended Master Plan for its corporate headquarters
site which illustrates the locations and sizes of the buildings
and parking facilities proposed to be constructed on the site
by the year 2005. A reduced copy of the Master Plan is
attached hereto as Appendix 2. The Master Plan contemplates
construction of approximately 1,000,000 square feet of office
and commercial space. While the most recent environmental
Ag
impact statement covering the area concludes that this
additional development could occur, it acknowledged that it
would cause a traffic problem. An existing indirect source
permit for the site does not permit the additional
development. The City believes that, with implementation of
the Program, Northwest Airlines can obtain an amendment to the
existing indirect source permit which would enable the
Northwest Airlines Master Plan to be completed.
In addition, the City believes that implementation of
the Program will permit other significant private developments
to occur within the District without undue traffic congestion.
The traffic problems associated with commercial
development in that portion of the Development District
generally known as the Lone Oak site have studied by consulting
engineers. These studies, including the Lone Oak Travel Demand
Management Plan, dated , 1988 prepared by BRW,
and the , dated prepared by Short
Elliott Hendrickson, are on file at the office of the City
Administrator.
C. AUTHORITY TO ESTABLISH A TAX INCREMENT DISTRICT AND TO
IMPLEMENT A DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM
The City has power to establish a tax increment
financing district under the Tax Increment Act and to undertake
development programs as defined in the Development District
Act. The City has authority under the Development District Act
tc acquire, construct, reconstruct, improve, alter, extend,
operate, maintain or promote developments aimed at improving
the physical facilities, quality of life and quality of
transportation.
D. DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM OBJECTIVES
The objectives sought to be accomplished by the City
in establishing its Development District No. 2 and in carrying
out the Development Program for the Development District are as
follows:
1. To promote and secure development and expansion
of new business.
2. To provide employment opportunities through the
creation of new jobs.
3. To expand the tax base of the City.
4. To improve transportation within the City.
zS�
E. DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT ACTIVITIES
The objectives of this Development District will be
accomplished through the actions described below.
The specific public transportation facilities to be
constructed in the Development District and the timing thereof
will ultimately depend on a number of factors, including but
not limited to the timing and nature of private development in
the Development District, the degree of cooperation by other
local governments and the Minnesota Department of Transporta-
tion, the availability of necessary permits from the
Metropolitan Council, the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency
and other governmental authorities and the availability of
financing.
As of the date hereof, the City has identified the
following transportation improvements as the planned activities
to be constructed in cooperation with the Minnesota Department
of Transportation, Dakota County and other affected
jurisdictions:
1. Intersection Capacity Improvements. Intersection
capacity improvements, consisting primarily of the addition of
turn lanes, are proposed to be constructed at certain
intersections in the Development District as set forth in
Appendix 3 hereto.
2. HOV Interchange. An HOV (high occupancy vehicle)
interchange for I-494 is proposed to be constructed east of TH
149 and west of Delaware Avenue. The interchange would be
restricted to vehicles with two or more occupants only. The
interchange may also include HOV lanes on I-494. Attached
hereto as Appendix 4 is a possible diagram of the interchange.
3. General Purpose Interchange. As an alternative
to the HOV Interchange, a general purpose interchange may be
constructed in the same general location as proposed for the
HOV Interchange. Attached as Appendix 5 is a possible layout
for the general purpose interchange.
4. New Ramps Along I-494. New exit and entrance
ramps are proposed to be constructed along I-494 between TH 149
and I -35E, including modifications to the intersections of the
TH 149/I-494 westbound ramps and the TH 149/1-494 eastbound
ramps. The new ramps would be substantially as shown by the
layout attached as Appendix 6.
5. Widening of TH 149. If new ramps are constructed
to I -35E, the TH 149 bridge over I-494 would be expanded to
provide an additional lane in each direction. The third lane
would begin at the northerly I-494 ramp terminal and continue
through the TH 149 intersection with Northwest Parkway.
As indicated above, the design and location of these
proposed transportation improvements, and the selection of
alternatives, are subject to a number of considerations. The
eventual configurations, however, must satisfy the basic
minimum requirements that they (a) are of such design and
location that they permit Northwest Airlines to obtain an
indirect source permit for construction of improvements
proposed to be completed at that site for the next five years
and (b) can be completed with projected tax increment revenues
from the proposed Tax Increment Financing District and funds
provided by Northwest Airlines and other governmental units.
In addition, the design and location will reflect the
relationship of the improvements to the enhancement of
additional commercial development, the availability of
additional revenue and the needs of local residents and other
governmental units.
F. LAND USE
All development on lands in Development District No. 2
will be for the uses described above and for uses permitted by
law. The Development Program does not involve any restrictions
on the use of private property.
G. LAND ACQUISITION
No properties are to be acquired by the City in
connection with the Development Program, except right-of-way
necessary for the construction of the transportation
improvements described above.
H. ADMINISTRATION
The City Administrator shall be responsible for the
administration of Development District No. 2 on behalf of the
City of Eagan.
I. ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROLS
The private development by Northwest Airlines
described above will be subject to an amended indirect source
permit issued by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency.
Construction of the improvements will be subject to all
environmental permits and controls required by law.
J. MAINTENANCE AND OPERATION.
The maintenance and operation of the transportation
improvements constructed as part of the Program is expected to
be the responsibility of the governmental unit having
jurisdiction and responsibility therefor. It is expected that
improvements under the jurisdiction of the City will be
operated and maintained in the same manner as other City
streets from general funds appropriated or available therefor.
2103e
Schedule I
Development District No. 2 of the City of Eagan
consists of the properties within the following boundaries:
2103e
Agenda Information Memo
December 6, 1988, City Council Meeting
TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT #1 PLAN
F. Receive Northeast Eagan Tax Increment Financing District #1
Plan and Set Public Hearing --The City Council has held a meeting
with Northwest Airlines at an October 27 special meeting to
discuss the necessity of off-site transportation improvements if
Northwest Airlines is to proceed with corporate expansion plans
during the summer of 1989. Off-site transportation improvements
will more than likely include additional freeway lanes, a
potential of an additional interchange or off ramps and the
improvement of state or county highways in northeast Eagan.
There are but limited revenue sources available for funding these
types of improvements with the exception of using tax increment
financing. The tax increment financing would only be used for
off-site improvements pertaining to improved roadway design.
The program or project area as defined in item E outlines the
area within northeast Eagan that may require roadway
improvements. The tax increment finance district #1 would be
confined to corporate expansion that is proposed by both
Northwest Airlines and Cray Research during 1989.
Again, the action for City Council consideration is to set a
public hearing date for January 17 for the purpose of
considering a resolution for the establishment of a tax increment
financing district #1.
For a copy of the resolution establishing the development
district and tax increment financing district, refer to page
q,S . This is a combined resolution for action items E and F.
Assuming approval, separate resolutions will be written.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny setting
a public hearing for January 17, 1989, to consider the
establishment of Tax Increment Financing District #1.
`/
PRELIMINARY RESOLUTION FOR
ESTABLISHMENT OF DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT
AND TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT
BE IT RESOLVED By the City Council of the City of
Eagan, Minnesota, as follows:
1. There have been presented to this Council drafts
of a Development Program and Tax Increment Financing Plan for
proposed Development District No. 2 of the City to be created
pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.124 to 469.134 and
Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.174 to 469.179.
2. A public hearing on the creation of the
Development District and the establishment of the Tax Increment
Financing District pursuant to the Tax Increment Financing plan
shall be held at City Hall on Tuesday, January 1989 and the
City Clerk shall give notice thereof in the manner required by
law. The Clerk or Administrator shall also provide the Dakota
County Board of Commissioners and the School Board of
Independent School District No. with information on the
fiscal and economic implications of the Tax Increment Financing
Plan at least 30 days prior to the hearing.
3. Prior to distribution of the proposed Development
Program and Tax Increment Financing Plan the City Administrator
is authorized to complete, update and revise the information
therein based upon the advice of engineering, financial and
legal consultants to the City.
2102e
MEMO TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIIMEMBERS
FROM: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES
DATE: NOVEMBER 30, 1988
SUBJECT: INFORMATIVE
METROPOLITAN COUNCIL DISTRICT 15 REPRESENTATIVE APPOINTMENT
A previous informative memo included a discussion regarding the
appointment of a Metropolitan Council representative from
District 15 due to the announcement from Mary Martin that she is
not seeking reappointment. District 15 includes the cities of
Eagan, Inver Grove Heights, Mendota Heights, West St. Paul, South
St. Paul, Newport and the Highland Park area of St. Paul.
Considering the number of issues that will be confronting the
City of Eagan such as airport adequacy, metropolitan
significance, transportation and the related, it would behoove
our city to participate in the selection of a good candidate who
could provide a strong representation on the Metropolitan
Council. Deborah Tompkins has contacted this office and is
expressing interest in pursuing the appointment. Her
application, in addition to other applications and a memo from
the City Administrator of Mendota Heights is enclosed on pages
�,� through 0j. If the City Council would like to endorse a
candidate or irect the Mayor or City Administrator to write a
letter of support to the nominating committee or Governor on
behalf of a candidate, this item should be considered as a part
of Additional Business at the meeting on Tuesday. Since the
Northern Dakota County mayors group meets monthly and has
historically been involved in the appointment of a Metropolitan
Council district representative, the City Council could wait
until after the next mayor/manager breakfast on December 16 and
consider an endorsement at the December 20 meeting.
CARRIAGE HILLS GOLF COURSE
FALCON WAY PROPERTY DAMAGE COMPLAINTS
The City's prosecuting attorney, Kevin Eide, Police Captain
Geagan and the City Administrator have met with legal counsel
representing Carriage Hills Golf Course to discuss some means of
mitigating the threat of health, safety and welfare concerns of
residents on Falcon Way from golf balls veering into the yards
and causing either personal or property damage. Enclosed on
pages Ipti through is a memo prepared by Police Captain
Geagan that summarizes t e Carriage Hills Golf Course issue.
DAKOTA COUNTY CHRISTMAS PARTY
Enclosed on page OS is a copy of the notice for the Dakota
Award Holiday Luncheon that is scheduled for December 8, 1988 at
Southview Country Club. Reservations were made for Mayor
Ellison, City Councilmembers Egan, Gustafson and Wachter as well
as the City Administrator and Chief of Police Berthe.
LIGHTING OF SPORTS FIELDS AND HOCKEY RINKS
Enclosed on page ((1 is a memo from the Director of Parks and
Recreation that addresses concepts to reduce sports lighting
glare and light spillage at hockey rinks and athletic fields
within the City.
CELEBRATE MINNESOTA 1990
RELOCATION AND PRESERVATION OF OLD TOWN HALL
It appears that the Eagan Rotary Club may adopt the relocation
and preservation of the old Town Hall as a service club project
in 1989 by contributing both person hours and a dollar
contribution. City Councilmember Wachter and the City
Administrator, with the assistance of the Administrative Intern,
are finalizing the grant application for submission by the
September 16 deadline.
CEDARVALE DRIVE PARKING LOT EXPANSION
As the City Council recalls, the owners of Cedarvale Shopping
Center have requested a relocation of the MTC Park and Ride site
to allow for additional parking at their center. The Director of
Public Works has investigated alternative sites with Mr. Brown
and representatives of the MTC, however, due to the pending opt
out legislation the MTC indicated that they would not be willing
to expend any funds for the construction or relocation of the
Park and Ride site. Until an acceptable site and related
relocation site costs can be resolved, the expansion of the
Cedarvale Center parking lot and relocation of the Park and Ride
site has been placed on hold. City Councilmember Gustafson has
suggested a location on Nicols Road that may be a viable site for
a Park and Ride site and that information has been forwarded to
the MTC. Since Cedarvale Shopping Center is not leasing space as
quickly as the owners had predicted, the lack of parking has not
been the issue they once anticipated. As the center continues to
lease and the opt out question is addressed during 1989, the City
is hopeful that MTC will bring a favorable resolution to this
issue.
LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES PROPOSED POLICIES AND PRIORITIES
Approximately six (6) weeks ago, a copy of the League of
Minnesota Cities policy and priority manual was distributed to
each member of the City Council. At the annual League's policy
adoption meeting that was held on November 16, the policies and
priorities were adopted as presented.
9'1
DAKOTA COUNTY RECYCLING NEWSLETTER UPDATE
Enclosed without page number is the most recent newsletter from
Dakota County that addresses the recycling implementation
strategy and includes other informative articles.
/s/ Thomas L. Hedges
Administrative Assistant
�8
City of
CitMendota Heights
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
MEMO
,
NOVEMBER 28, 1988
TO: Northern Dakota County City Administrators
FROM: Kevin D. Frazell, Mendota Heights City Administrator
SUBJECT: Metropolitan Council District 15 Representative
I have spoken with Gary Pagel of the Metropolitan
Council Chair staff regarding the process for appointing
someone to the District 15 seat. Gary tells me the
following:
Under current law, the Governor must appoint a
nominating committee. The committee was supposed to have
been appointed in October, but as of last Friday, the
appointments have not yet been made. Gary did not know
whether the Governor would simply reappoint the previous
committee, which included Mary Anderson.
Once appointed, the committee is required to notify each
city, the county, and legislative representative from the
District that the application process is open, soliciting
their input. Application forms can be obtained from the
Metropolitan Council Chair's office. The applications are
filed with the Secretary of State's office, who turns them
over to the nominations committee.
The nomination committee is required to hold a public
hearing in the District, and letters of recommendation, etc.,
are welcome, along with public testimony on behalf of
particular candidates.
Once the committee has completed its work in all
districts where there are vacancies, it forwards its
recommendations to the Governor for his consideration. He is
not obligated to follow the recommendations, although it was
Gary's opinion that Governor Perpich probably would follow
the recommendations, and had always done so in the past.
Attached are two resumes or letters which have been
forwarded to me, one for Sheila Tatone, and one for Dwight
1101 Victoria Curve • Mendota Heights, MN • 55118 452.1850
Peterson. Other names that Gary had heard mentioned included
Deborah Tompkins, Kathy Gaylord, Cal Bloomquist, and a Sue
McCloskey from Highland Park. Gary was of the opinion that
because of the airport noise issue, the Highland Park
neighborhood might become quite active in trying to promote a
representative from their District.
We had originally agreed that resumes for any one
interested should be sent to me by next Friday, December 2,
and I would then redistribute them to the rest of you.
However, since it does not appear that time is of the
essence, perhaps we can extend that a week or so. We can
then schedule it for discussion at our Mayor/Manager's
breakfast on December 16.
KDF:madlr
DEBORAH TOMPKINS
1681 Walnut Lane
Eagan, Minnesota
(612) 454-6817
PERSONAL DATA
Birthdate: July 3, 1948 Married - 2 children
EDUCATION
B.A. Communications from the College of St. Catherine - 1984
BUSINESS
Owner of Tompkins and Associates, a sales and marketing firm - 1980 to present
Owner of the Minnesota Connection, a national distributorship - 1986 to present
Member of the Northern Dakota County Chamber of Commerce, serving on the Government Affairs Committee
- 1988.
EXPERIENCE
Candidate for Dakota County Commissioner - 1984 and 1988
Responsibilities: Designed campaign logo, brochures, and lawn signs; wrote and edited campaign bro-
chures, newspaper profiles, letters to the editor, news releases, and fundraising letters; served
as campaign manager and supervised campaign committee; wrote and delivered speeches at candidate
forums and city council meetings; recruited volunteers for fundraising, doorknocking, signs, and
literature drops; raised necessary campaign funds from organizations and individuals; made public
appearances at group functions; held interviews with statewide and local newspapers; organized mail-
ings to registered voters and potential funders.
Member of the Board of Directors of the Association for Retarded Citizens - 1987 to present
Responsibilities: Serving as the ARC representative on the Dakota County Interagency Early Interven-
tion Committee; co-chairing the ARC fundraising committee for the 1988 and 1989 Tapemark Charity
Pro -Am Golf Tournament.
Member of the Special Needs Advisory Committee of the Indian Council, Boy Scouts of America - 1988.
Responsibilities: Developing resources necessary to provide Scouting programs for youth with special
needs.
President of the Community Action Council, Inc. - 1984 to 1985
(CAC is the largest non-profit human service agency in Dakota County)
Responsibilities: Made formal presentations to funders such as the St. Paul and Minneapolis United
Ways, Dakota County Board, and local city councils; chaired the site selection committee which
located a site and approved plans and financing for a new $1 million agency facility and a new
$500,000 shelter for battered women; worked with the developer, contractors, and architects on the
design for the new facilities; chaired the long-range planning committee which developed a strategic
five-year plan for the agency; served on the development committee which raised ten percent of the
annual budget; reorganized the board structure and promoted board training through workshops and
an annual board retreat.
Chair of the Communications Committee of the Community Action Council Board - 1977 to 1983
Responsibilities: Completed a public relations audit of the entire agency and developed a comprehen-
sive public relations plan; redesigned the agency logo, newsletter, brochure, and annual report;
produced and financed two agency slide shows; organized a ten-year anniversary celebration which
included the local officials, the media, and the public.
Member of an Admissions and Allocations Panel of the St. Paul United Way - 1979 to 1985
Responsibilities: Prioritized community needs and services; reviewed agency programs and budgets;
allocated funds to human service agencies; solicited funds from small businesses.
Co -Director of Kids 'n Kinship - 1975 to 1977
Responsibilities: Interviewed and screened prospective volunteers, children, and their parents;
matched volunteers with children and monitored their progress; solicited donations; edited
newsletter.
(o\
RESUME
SHEILA TATONE
BIOGRAPHY:
Age: 39
Married to Paul
Two children, Aaron age 12 and Susie age 9
Thirteen year resident of Inver Grove Heights
BS in Science Education, Bemidji State College
OCCUPATION:
Deputy Registrar, owner of the Inver Grove License Center
EXPERIENCE IN PUBLIC LEADERSHIP:
Past Positions:
DFL: Associate Precinct Chairman; Precinct Chairman; Senate
District 39 Associate Chairman
Chairman of the Inver Grove Heights Park Commission, 1978 to
1980
Inver Grove Heights City Council Member, September, 1980 to
December 31, 1985
Met Council Solid Waste Advisory Board Member
Member of the Advisory Body re: Hazardous Waste Facility for
the Waste Management Board
SSP -IGH Chamber of Commerce Board of Directors, 1986 to 1988
Alumni, Leadership South St. Paul
Present Positions:
Chairman of the Inver Grove Heights Park and Recreation
Commission
Cahill Corridor Business Association Board of Directors
Gun Club Lake W.M.O. Board of Directors, 1986 to present
Developed "Star City Days" as a community celebration,
Board of Directors
tp
CI Y
II ST. pAtiv.
November 21, 1988
Kevin Frazell
City Administrator
City Hall
1101 Victoria Curve
Mendota Heights, Mn. 55118
Dear Kevin:
oFricr: )r- CITY ADMINISTRATOR
(612) 450.8700
r ti rir url?
;i 1' (\ I I
Enclosed is a copy of a letter of introduction from Dwight
Peterson, South St. Paul City Councilmember relative to his
candidacy for the Met Council. Dwight has chosen to send
similar copies directly to area elected -appointed officials.
As of this date Kathleen Gaylord has not provided me with any
information relative to her candidacy. However, I suspect she
remains committed. If and when I receive a resume or letter,
I'll forward it to you.
If you have questions, give me a call at 450-8700.
Sincer ky,
Gary
City
L. W
Admijiistrator
GLW/ln
[ 03
(AIN Or
¶() )111 S1'. PAM_
To Whom It May Concern:
Councilmember Dwight Peterson
1912 Butler Avenue
South St. Paul, Minnesota 55075
The purpose of my letter is two fold. First to inform you
that Mary Martin, our current representative on the Metropoli-
tan Council (District 15) is not seeking reappointment.
Second to seek your support for my candidacy to that appoint-
ment. Listed below is a brief biography.
- Life long resident of South St. Paul
- Graduate of South St. Paul High School 1950. Attended
Luther College, Trained in Labor Relations
- Employed by Northwestern Bell and AT&T for 33 years. Had
various technical positions, Marketing and Sales responsib-
ilities and single point of contact for servicing large
corporate customers.
- Presently self-employed as communications consultant
- Elected Trasurer of Communications Workers of America Local
7201 1970 - 1976
- Elected to the South St. Paul City Council 1973. Reelected
1975, 1977, 1979, 1983, 1987
- Appointed HRA Commissioner 1976 and presently serve as
Mayor Pro Tem
� o�
- Recently elected chairman of the Lower Mississippi Water-
shed Management Organization which includes Inver Grove
Heights, West St. Paul, Sunfish Lake, Mendota Heights,
Lilydale, St. Paul and South St. Paul
Member of Luther Memorial Church, Lions Club and Chamber of
Commerce
Hopefully the above has indicated that I have been devoted to
Civic and Community service most of my life. Since I am self-
employed I have the time necessary to properly focus on the
problems and needs of our region. Additionally I would have
the flexibility to become accessible to those communities in
our region to assure good communication and attention to your
particular problems as they arise.
As a result of having served as an elected official for 15
years I have had the opportunity to establish good working
relationships with elected and appointed state, county and
city officials. This would be an asset to our area.
I am familiar with the Metropolitan Council's 1989 priority
projects as they relate to planning, solid waste management,
water management, transportation, airport and human resource.
While time and space does not allow me to address those
subjects in detail I would certainly seek your input and
advice in the decision making process.
Should you have any questions or choose to endorse my
candidacy, I make myself available at your convenience. I can
be reached at (612) 451-8990.
Sincerely, /
Dwight Peterson
DP/ln
police department
JAY M.BERTHE
Chief of Police
PATRICK J. GEAGAN
Administrative Captain
city of eagan K Opera nsCaptD. in
Operations Captain
3830 Pilot Knob Road
Eagan, Minnesota 55122
Phone: (612) 454-3900
November 29, 1988
TO: TOM HEDGES, CITY ADMINISTRATOR
FROM: PAT GEAGAN, CAPTAIN
VIC ELLISON
Mayor
THOMAS EGAN
DAVID K. GUSTAFSON
PAMELA McCREA
THEODORE WACHTER
Council Members
THOMAS HEDGES
City Administrator
EUGENE VAN OVERBEKE
City Clerk
SUBJECT: CARRIAGE HILLS GOLF COURSE, FALCON WAY PROPERTY
DAMAGE COMPLAINTS
As you requested, the following is meant to capsulize the
events which took place relative to the Falcon Way
resident's complaints about property damage done by the
players on the Carriage Hills Golf Course.
It is my understanding that the Mayor and other city
officials have met with the residents of Falcon Way, as well
as representatives of the Carriage Hills Golf Course this
past summer, in an attempt to resolve the problem of
property damage to the resident's home on Falcon Way by users
of the Carriage Hills Golf Course. It is also my
understanding that, as a result of those meetings, there was
an impasse as to a solution of this problem. As a result of
the impasse, the Police Department was asked to consider the
possibility of criminally charging Carriage Hills Golf
Course for Permitting a Public Nuisance. The Police
Department received opinions from both the City Attorney, as
well as the City Prosecutor, that a criminal charge of Public
Nuisance would be proper. As a result of those opinions, I
wrote to Bill Smith, Carriage Hills Golf Course, that the
golf course would be charged with Public Nuisance, if we
received any further complaints from the neighbors on Falcon
Way. My letter also asked for a meeting with
representatives from Carriage Hills attempting to solve the
problem prior to any criminal charges. As a result of that
letter, Carriage Hills agreed to meet with representatives
from the City. On November 22, 1988, Tom Westbrook, Manager
of Carriage Hills; Joseph Lulic, Attorney representing
Carriage Hills, Kevin Eide, Tom Hedges, Kev Vraa, and I met.
THE LONE OAK TREE THE SYMBOL OF STRENGTH AND GROWTH IN OUR COMMUNITY
`oCP
Carriage Hills Golf Course
Page 2
It seems there are currently two potential options for
reducing the number of golf balls that are hitting the homes
on Falcon Way. Those are; erection of a net in front of the
four or five homes most often struck, and lowering the t -box
on that particular hole. The other option is reversing the
two holes that are closest to the homes on Falcon Way. The
first option was discussed, at length, and seemed to be the
most appropriate, at this time. Ken Vraa and Tom Westbrook
agreed they will research the matter further to determine its
feasibility and cost. As you are aware, there were some
concerns by people attending this meeting that the
neighborhood was not going to be happy with the erection of a
large net. Again, this is an option. However, it was felt
that regardless of what was decided, it would be impossible
to eliminate all the balls going onto the property along
Falcon Way.
There was general agreement by all parties that correcting
this problem would be expensive and will more than likely not
totally solve the problem. It appears that everyone is going
to have to compromise. Although Carriage Hills is willing to
work with the City to resolve the property damage issue, they
made it very clear that they would not absorb the entire cost
that will be incurred. You indicated you would bring the
matter to the City Council's attention and ask if the City
would be willing to incur a portion of the cost.
Patrick J. Geagan
Captain
PJG:lb
DAKOTA AWARD HOLIbAY LUNCHEON
DECEMBER 8, 1988
11:45 AM TO 1:30 PM
SOUTHVIEW COUNTRY CLUB
239 E. MENMDOTA ROAD, WEST ST. PAUL
CHRISTMAS SOUP
TENDERLOIN STEAK WITH BURGUNDY MUSHROOM SAUCE
BROILED TOMATO WITH WILD RICE
STRAWBERRY SHORTCAKE
$18.00 PREPAY
$20.00 PREREGISTER, PAY AT DOOR
$22.00 No RESERVATION
Entertainment by Rosemount High School Chamber Singers
who will soon be traveling toVienna to perform
RSVP: CALL THE CHAMBER OFFICE OR RETURN THE RESERVATION FORM BELOW
452-9872
The DAKOTA AWARD will be presented to an individual who either resides in Dakota
County or works in Dakota County who has made a contribution to the betterment
of the quality of life in Dakota County by personal efforts not related to his/
her vocation.
Once again we ask that each attendee bring an unwrapped gift to the luncheon.This
year's recipients of the gifts will be Dakota's Children, Inc. (a residential
facility for physically and mentally handicapped children in West St. Paul) and the
B. Robert Lewis House (an emergency shelter for women and their children in times
of crisis serving Dakota County). Please attach Your business card to the Rift.
Following is a list of suggested gifts. Duplicates will not be a problem. The
items will be used for both recreational and developmental skill development as well
as just plain fun.
Art Supplies
Children's Books (Pre-school to teenagers)
Puzzles
Nerf Toys
Color Books, crayons
Sticker books, stickers
Dolls
Legos
Transformers
Blocks
Bells
Fischer Price items
Musical Instruments or musical toys
Lite Brite
Ring Toss
Hand Puppets
Alf, Care Bears, Stuffed Toys
Markers
Simon
For the older children:
T -Shirts
Makeup
Radios & Batteries
Board Games of all types
��B
MEMORANDUM
TO: TOM HEDGES, CITY ADMINISTRATOR
HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
PARKS & RECREATION ADVISORY COMMISSION
FROM: KEN VRAA, DIRECTOR OF PARKS & RECREATION
DATE: NOVEMBER 17, 1988
RE: REDUCTION IN SPORTS LIGHTING GLARE & LIGHT SPILLAGE
At the recent National Conference for Parks & Recreation, I was invited to
participate in a showing of a new innovation in sports lighting designed to
curb and reduce the amount of glare and light spillage associated with
athletic field lighting.
There have been numerous attempts in the past by lighting manufacturers to
reduce these problems. None have been significantly successful in reducing
glare without reducing the amount of light output (in the foot candles) on the
playing field and/or without reducing the efficiencies of the lighting
without an increase in operational costs. So far these attempts have only
been marginally successful and have done little too curb glare.
The problem of sports lighting glare and light spillage in Eagan has yet to
become a major issue. The department has received relatively few calls over
the years complaining or objecting to the lighting of fields and hockey rinks
due to the problem of glare and spillage. With construction of the athletic
fields, we have taken neighborhood concerns regarding lighting into
consideration, and have tried to mitigate the issues through pole location,
height, aiming of lights, etc., in the original parks design. We will
continue to do so with future designs. However, to many people, this may not
be enough.
Unfortunately, we will never be able to totally eliminate glare and light
spillage; whenever you have a high intensity light source as we do with our
athletic fields and skating rinks, you will always have glare. Like odor,
severity is always subject to individual interpretation. Due to individual
differences with the reception of light to the eye, there will always be
different views as to how "good" or how "bad" the problem has been dealt with.
Recently, I had an opportunity to review a new innovation developed by Musco
Lighting to reduce glare, without light loss. It is the first time I have
seen a positive step in the right direction. For this reason, I am taking
steps to have this modification installed on six lights at Goat Hill Park
skating rink for the winter season, so that you too may see the results of
this technology. For comparison sake, I will not be doing all of the
lights; therefore the results may be difficult to evaluate. Nevertheless,
the Council and Commission will be able to see if this innovation will reduce
glare and light spillage enough to make it worth the additional installation
investment for these lights in future athletic fields.
I will keep you informed as to when these modifications will be installed.
KV/bls
MINUTES OF REGULAR':MEETING OF:.'UE EAGAN CITY COUNCIL
44GAN, MINISOTA
NOVEI"t'5, 1988
A regular meeting of the Eagan City Council was held on Tuesday,
November 15, 1988, at 6:3Q. p,.l. at., the••Eagan Municipal Center.
Present were Mayor Vic EllUOWAil:V*40,T0gmembers Wachter, Egan,
Gustafson and McCrea. Also presOtterItCity Administrator Tom
Hedges, City Engineer Tom Colbert, Com tttlnity Development Director
Dale Runkle and City Attorney Ja es She:don.
• 'AGD..
Gustafson moved, Wachter seconded, the motion to approve the
agenda as presented. All voted in favor.
MINUTES
November 1. 1988. Coda0amemperCo McCrea requested a correction on
page 10, paragraph 5, changiiicj•••:gy get...4and. " to "land to the west."
She also requested a change QZI. page•••: •6, ,paragraph 4, deleting "20% of
the".
Dave Gustafson reques:eki:':gicffange on page 13, first paragraph,
rewording the motion to rci'•""Wachter moved, Gustafson seconded, the
motion to request the County to install a temporary concrete median
and request a full median extension on Cliff Road to improve the
safety of the right -in and right -out turn movement from the Rahncliff
2nd Addition. All voted in favor."
requested: a::atc:cam page 8, paragraph 2, from
"removal of ::peat".
Egan seconde:cl the:'::lotion to approve the minutes
1988, regular:meet'±ri.g as amended. All voted in
Mayor Ellison
"piling of peat" to
Wachter moved,
for the November 1,
favor.
STREET NAME CHANGE, HAEG COURT IN DODD FARM ADDITION
City Administrator Tom Hedges inf:4rmed the Council of a request
received from Mark Calvin Construction::::o change the street name Haeg
Court to Calvin Court. He stated a resbY''ution would be filed with the
final plat at both the Cir..:4:C0044ty levels.
Wachter moved, Gustafson seconde the motion to approve the
change in street name of Haeg Court tc1alvin Court. All voted in
favor.
Page 2/EAGAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES
November 15, 1988
DAKOTA COUNTY SOIL:•aA'ND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT AWARD
Tim Kelly presented die City of :gan with an award in
recognition of their effot :: a. _pr•�.gt. ting conservation measures
et4
within Dakota County. He comtii:•'';iit City Council and the City
staff and also recognized Tom -Colbert and Mike Foertsch for their
efforts. Dwaine Otte presented an award to the Mayor. Mayor Ellison
stated it was an honor for the City and he commended the staff for
their excellent work.
A. Personnel Items.
CONNAGENDA
1. Combination Building :Xri:s;Pectgr•,:• It was recommended to approve
the hiring of Dale Schoeppri:e:r:.• as •a; .•ont•bination building inspector,
contingent upon successful completion of the City's physical
examination requirement.
2. Seasonal Utility Maintenance Worker. It was recommended to
approve the hiring of Scott Provost as a seasonal utility maintenance
worker.
B. Resolution Proclaiming :N•att:dier 30 as Eagan and Burnsville
Public Access Volunteer Apprci atidn : Duy.
•
It was recommended to..appr.':4v. 'a' resolution proclaiming November
30 as Eagan and Burnsvill'O : Wic Access Volunteer Appreciation Day.
C. Project 554. Authorize Payment for Easement Acquisition
(General Electric Supply Company - Storm Sewer).
It was recommended to authorize payment of $500.00 for easement
acquisition for Project 5.4:4'' Ce ez a1.F ,ectric Supply Company - Storm
Sewer) .
D. Vacate Utility and Draif:ge Eck:•gment, Receive Petition/Set
Public Hearing (Lots 5 and 6. B1t ck 21::. 1ackhawk Glen 2nd Addition) .
It was recommended to receive the'•petition to vacate a common
lot line drainage and utility easement over Lots 5 and 6, Block 2,
Blackhawk Glen 2nd Addition, and schedule a public hearing to be held
on December 6, 1988.
E. Contract 87-34, Final P.4ymentlA ceptance (Sperry Reservoir -
Repainting).
Page 3/EAGAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES
November 15, 1988
It was recommended t:' approve the third and final payment for
Contract 87-34 (Sperry ReSrvoir - Repainting) in the amount of
$19,615.40 to Rainbow, Ind:;:, and acce::t. the project for perpetual
maintenance.
F. Approve Final Plat. Stoney Pointe 2nd Addition.
It was recommended to approve the final plat for the Stoney
Pointe 2nd Addition and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute
all related documents. .
G. Approve Specifications/.gtzthori:at Advertisement for Bids for
Recyclable Containers.
Jon Hohenstein answe:r•:ex . t tie.wn•c..1's questions regarding the
matter. • •
It was recommended to approve the specifications and authorize
advertisement for bids for recyclable containers.
Gustafson moved, Wachter seconded, the motion to approve the
foregoing consent agenda ;. ;hints. and authorize their implementation.
All voted in favor.
DEPART.b1ENT HEAD::$:USINESS
Mike Reardon reminde0 01:e•': atzncil that November 30, 1988, was
Public Access Volunteer App:�eiation Day and an awards presentation
would be held from 6:00 td 8:00 p. m.
Chief Southorn informed the Council that Station 5 was now open.
Councilmember Egan stated he was pleased to hear that Station 4 was
now staffed. Mayor Ellison. gpes.txoned _the grand opening plans. Chief
Southorn stated the grana.,o.pe:nj Gu3;d:': be in the near future.
Councilmember Wachter obj e:ed to:':the Blackhawk stop signs.
Special Council Meeting/Novtemnber .1. 1988
City Administrator Tom Hedges reported that a special meeting
had been set for November 29, 1988, at 7:00 p.m.
Egan moved, Wachter seconded, the motion to schedule a special
council meeting on November 29, 1988 W:7:00 p.m. for further review
of the Community Center plan. All vote:.in favor.
COMMUI41'T�Y : EA -:.::REAR - 1989
City Administrator Tom Hedges ingrixmed the Council that 1989 was
Community Clean-up Year. He questioned :if it was the concensus of the
Council to defer the relocation of the City Hall and pursue County
Page 4/EAGAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES
November 15, 1988
funding. Councilmembers MitCrea and Wafter were in agreement to wait
to contact the County. Hedges questio.Agd if he should contact various
service organizations for.:'gheir Councilmembers Egan and
McCrea agreed that he shoul.004#0t0ervice organizations.
VACATE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY/APOLLO ROAD
Public Works Director Tom Colbert updated the Council on the
matter and informed them that several City utilities exist within the
alignment. He stated it ;4044: be: ifiebaai4ry to retain all appropriate
drainage and utility easemehtS'vAite 1.$4ating only the public
right-of-way along the alignment -4.
. . .
Bob Worthington (Opus) sppltiO.Fted.. the vacation and stated he was
available for questions.
'• . .
Mr. Colbert suggested requiring the appropriate combination of
lots to eliminate any landlocked properties.
Egan moved, Wachter seconded, the motion to close the public
hearing and approve the vacation of public right-of-way for Apollo
Road between Mike Collins.DAre..and Trunk Highway 149, subject to the
appropriate combination of Ito. eliminate any landlocked
properties. All voted in favqr.
FINAL ASSESSMENT BAA$100%0ANKEE DOODLE ROAD)
Public Works Directotirn Colbert summarized the history on the
matter.
Charles Bartholdi (on behalf of Federal Land Company) recapped
past objections and stated they were withdrawing their objection to
the assessment.
Councilmember Egan questiorked if the O'Neil parcel would be
removed. Mr. Colbert stated it 40:41d ri4 be removed.
Wachter moved, McCrea second, t1 motion to close the public
hearing and approve the final assessmebt roll for Project 461 (Yankee
Doodle Road - 35E to Lexington Avenue) and authorize the
certification to the County. All voted in favor.
PRELIMINARY PLAT/SENECA pLANT ADDITION/MWCC
City Administrator Tom Hedges reciapped the history on the matter
and introduced Becky Comst:qc:}4...art?..a4:9pley who is an expert in the
environmental law who is rgs400:4:::4*1:::**stssisting in the preparation
of conditions addressing the odor issue,. Ms. Comstock issued a
revised agreement to the Council.
Page 5/EAGAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES
November 15, 1988
•
Representatives of M•
etcalf and E•ddy informed the Council of
their consulting qualifica:i;ions.
Ms. Comstock stated sh - : ad: 4f.ed the plant, reviewed the
documents, and drew up proposes •ednditions and an agreement. She
recapped the changes to the Development Agreement. She stated the
ultimate action on the matter would be a conditional approval,
subject to a purchase agreement and entering into an approved
Development Agreement. She .e.xpJ..a .ned the provisions of the proposed
Development Agreement. She•••s:a:e • :th.e:':1•anguage in the agreement was
disputed by MWCC and she present: cf'•co4omise language. She informed
the Council she was available far questions.
Consultant John Wood recapped thc••:review procedure. He was
confident the agreement w04 •:x:•1 gt•t4a 0 the problems.
Councilmember Gustafson requested clarification of Section 4.2.
Ms. Comstock explained the options. Gustafson questioned what would
happen after 1992. Ms. Comstock stated the development of an odor
control process would address that issue. She stated the upgrade
would coincide with the new. Seneca expansion. Mr. Gustafson stated
that 17 years of a proces::h d• .ot solved the problems. He questioned
the purchase of surrounding 'pt:o:pe.* Ms. Comstock stated the
citizens had statutory remedy,if fh:e• property was "taken". She stated
common law nuisance was also'.avaij,ahle,,
Councilmember Egan sh:K:04:A4r; Gustafson's concern regarding
enforcement. He would like.Ytidre control after 1992. He felt the MWCC
had too much discretion. He questioned other points and stated he
felt the MWCC retained discretion in Section 3.1(a).
Ms. Comstock explained the process and stated that the installed
equipment would be the be:p:t G4iar.:..edu•C•t•ion available.
Councilmember Egan reiterat..d his.:..concern regarding control
after 1992. Ms. Comstock stated;::t was,.;cifficult to set a standard
for odor. The consultant explain. l the:••difficulty of odor
measurement. He reported that ifthe et:tiipment was not working, the
state would inspect.
Mayor Ellison commented that at the last Council meeting, the
Council had recognized that their leverage was the permitting
process. Councilmember Egan asked why ..independent consultants
wouldn't apply to the other provisions The consultant stated those
areas were studied out. Mr. Egan asked -for an explanation of a scenic
easement. City Attorney Jt4.:$hk.do41::ti1ed it was for a wildlife
area.
Councilmember Egan also had quest*gns regarding Section 3.3(c)
regarding the sludge management and Section 4.4 regarding the
procedural aspect. Ms. Comstock outlined the options. Egan questioned
Page 6/CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES
November 15, 1988
•
the procedure if the MWCC-did not addr•66s the committee's concerns.
Ms. Comstock explained the•pptions.
Councilmember Wachter 44400. that the past history created
skepticism on his part. He stat.'•t'here were "no teeth" in the
agreement. He felt it should state "A fine would be imposed when
equipment failed". Councilmember McCrea stated that the state and the
PCA monitored the equipment but questioned if the City could enforce
the violations and how they . W.o.ul.4 enf'Qx.ce them. Mayor Ellison felt
the City could not make M1CC::s:4b47t:j :..i a:r:te blanche to citizens' groups
and felt there was an enforcement' prole ;:em.
Councilmember Gustafson fel the :council should proceed in some
way at the meeting. He felt. 410 ‘44 04 odor problem continued, the
citizens should be able tsa:.have• t404 'roperty purchased. He
questioned if the citizen *have that right.
Becky Comstock stated that it would be through the PCA only and
it would be inverse condemnation. Mr. Sheldon stated that neither the
City nor the MWCC had authority to give money away.
Jim Hiniker (MWCC) in40i: *d; .the Council that the MWCC was
operating in good faith and desir:e3: t. be a good neighbor. He stated
they could approve the agreet[te:nt as ainended and felt spirit and
effort was important.
Betty Bassett, 2101 W :h;e:ting Heights Road, asked where the park
location was and had questions concerning the ponds not being
covered. She was concerned regarding meaningless input and felt it
was unfair making them sue MWCC.
John Wesley, 1747 Bluebill, presented a zoning letter to the
Council.
City Attorney Jim Sheldon stated the zoning was proper and
reviewed the zoning history. He ::s:tated .:i.he use was not non -conforming
and that the zoning was never q4Wion:e I. by the City for 17 years. He
explained it would be difficult 'tri chane now. Mayor Ellison
explained that the minutes could be made available.
John Wesley questioned why past odor problems had not been
addressed. The consultant stating that odor control was not an
add-on. Mr. Wesley stated the agreemeng:gave them no new rights and
disagreed with the consultant's conc10 ons. He stated the PCA was
evaluating the odors. He h. conceX.ns.zegarding Seneca's compliance.
Mayor Ellison stated the P ::•:!,0$..:::;n:tter enforcement position
than the City.
Ted Tennis, 2135 Wuthering Height a, questioned the zoning and
wanted the clarifiers covered. He had concerns regarding the safety
of the gas storage and asked when the odors would cease. Mr. Sheldon
Page 7/EAGAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES
November 15, 1988
stated the zoning was determined I-1 s .,:.the time of the installation
and that the zoning was reviewed at the permit stage for 17 years.
•
Terrell Fridley (Attotfisy. •..4o.r,.C•:izens Against Seneca Expansion)
felt there was not enough rev�:#;�ia••:me'' concerning the agreement and
stated he wanted time to respond and be involved.
Mayor Ellison questioned why the ponds were not covered and when
the odor control would take place. Mr. Hiniker stated it was not
feasible to cover the pond0 a)1448• agar control would be staged.
John Melom, 3680 Ashbury Rfl d, ac:ar'essed his concerns regarding
the odors and stated he felt there were no teeth�� in the agreement.
Councilmember McCrea :ha1
and questioned if it woulc#..be
options. Mayor Ellison stated
council. Mr. Sheldon informed
answer most concerns.
•o:0e:rr: fegarding the scenic easement
'15ermai0nt. She questioned Eagan's legal
he felt they could not bind a future
the Council the final agreement would
Councilmember Wachter stated he felt Eagan was taking the brunt
for other communities. Copn.04member Gustafson outlined his concerns
regarding fining. Council CouncilMeliitt0flqap stated he felt the MWCC was
similar to a public utility w.hich•:te. •City could regulate. He felt
Eagan was best suited to moni::or compJ4ance and that every effort
must be made to regulate the :pro.4.00's: He felt the City had no
control after 1992. He state:d:'MWCC:•'could report and be audited. Mayor
Ellison remarked that the •bs1yway to control odors was to get going
on the procedure. He further stated that hired experts knew more than
the Councilmembers on the issue and that the City was not in the
waste control business. He stated they were already forcing MWCC to
spend millions on odor control and that the City could pursue their
legal options. He wanted t.�i prQCe$$.moved forward.
Councilmember McCrea' f e1t'•'•'s'eve'boncerns needed to be
addressed and questioned if "teed:h" co:ud be put into the citizens'
committee. She also questioned :f:': otheissues could be addressed.
Ms. Comstock stated that the agz:ementould be modified and that the
odor control program required standard::: .perating procedures.
Councilmember Egan questioned if the equipment had warranties.
The consultant explained the safeguards.
Gustafson moved, McCrea seconded,.::the motion
preliminary plat entitled "Seneca Plant:••Addition"
acres for the expansion og:•••the:..Se .oa: ,.Waste Water
located west of Comanche Ra•ia ,'�tt�:;::h :fQest half of
east half of Section 18, subjectto the following
1. The incorporation of the agreem*nt;
to approve the
consisting of 87.83
Treatment Plant
Section 17 and the
conditions:
Page 8/EAGAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES
November 15, 1988
2. Eagan citizen input;
3. Execution of the D•elopment..kgreement; and
4. Final approval of th'e• . iOv:eiopment Agreement by the City
Council at the December 6, 1988, City Council meeting.
Ellison, McCrea and Gustafson voted in favor; Egan and Wachter
voted against. The motion passed.
The Council discussed' wh'i'c4:po nt:s:•:in the agreement needed
revision. Councilmember McCrea stated •that legal counsel and the
experts should continue to addr.E.s the -Conditions. There was much
Council discussion regarding ei:4cemw3jc:. Councilmember Egan stated
the Council has the accourn:irac# zl•ity : hil.it should set up the
methodology.
PRELIMINARY PLAT/ROSEAGAN ADDITION
Community Development Director Dale Runkle detailed the history
on the matter. He stated :.he APC recommended approval of the matter.
The developer informed t i:e:.•:C :tin.c.i1 that the acreage would remain
the same but that Lot 5 would. be' rdaii&d. He objected to the
assessments and stated he fel. i~ the 4.xp pvements should be assessed
when they were completed and .to.•:bggr•ethat time.
Bob Hawkins, 4711 Dodd;': •reported that he was opposed to the City
sewer and water.
John Runkus, 4880 Dodd, informed the Council he was opposed to
the sewer and water.
Mayor Ellison questiO4 4t?:. the :iY:.:y as a need to levy the
assessments. Public Works Director' ironi"Colbert stated it was a policy
issue. He explained how the comp:'gjuide.4irected past City
expenditures and explained the d:xl:emmaHe stated that acquiring
assessments in the future would :b4 nea:>«o impossible. City
Administrator Tom Hedges remarked that:::the issue had come up before
and that experience showed that problems would arise. Councilmember
Egan agreed with Mr. Hedges.
Councilmember McCrea requested a description of the surrounding
property. Mr. Runkle described the surunding property.
Councilmember Wachter stated he felt that in the future wells may be
a problem.
Doug Johnson, 4775 Dodd, had concez.ns regarding sewer and water
and stated that areas around the devel4pinent had five acre lots.
Councilmember Egan stated that storm sewer was not being brought in
at this time. Mayor Ellison advised that land values would increase
Page 9/EAGAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES
November 15, 1988
and that lots would probaky subdivide;' There was discussion
regarding sewer and water:,,•
McCrea moved, Ellison :pdnde::,.:the motion to approve the
preliminary plat for the Ros'e'a:gani.:fddition, waive the assessments,
and amend the Comprehensive Guide Plan, subject to the following
conditions:
1. The standard conditigns of plat approval as adopted by
Council action on September :15••; .x;9:$7';'• .shall be complied with: B-1,
B-3, C-2, E-1, F-1 and ••
2. No expansion
permitted.
of the existing business of Lot 5 shall be
3. The well and septi•e••systems :shall conform to WPC40 standards.
4. Lots 1 and 4 shall be limited to one single family residence.
McCrea voted in favor; Wachter, Gustafson, Ellison and Egan
voted against. The motion tailed.
City Administrator Tort'tgle:dg :4:: stated that the previous motion
would need APC action and a pubIi'dAredring if it were passed.
Councilmember Gustafson stated he was:• ncerned that should sewer and
water be installed, who woul pay,;..':l?t bIic Works Director Tom Colbert
stated the looping would 4c4:iar .:f:tfirther to the north and that the
Council should re -zone fot:sver or collect the assessments at the
present time. Mayor Ellison stated the City could eat the cost now
and collect it when it is developed. Councilmember Egan stated he was
opposed to the motion for several reasons and felt that flexibility
would be lost, the comp guide change would be difficult and that it
was bad policy.
Egan moved, Wachter seconde31'''the.'motion to approve the
preliminary plat and variance tp.:•:the R0;5eagan Addition, subject to
the following conditions:
1. The standard conditions of platapproval as adopted by
Council action on September 15, 1987, shall be complied with: A-1,
B-1, B-3, C-2, E-1, F-1 and G-1.
2. No expansion of the existing business of Lot 5 shal
permitted.
3. The well and sept4,.;:sy.sm4••.S•all conform to WPC40
4. Lots 1 and 4 shall "be liriiited"to one single family
5. The deferment of the street 4 *dessments until the
upgraded.
1 be
standards.
residence.
street is
Page 10/EAGAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES
November 15, 1988
Egan, Wachter and E114eon voted i•n .favor; McCrea and Gustafson
voted against.
Councilmember McCrea stat04' sb felt the impact fee was too
high. There was further discussion regarding the assessment policy.
COPY MACHINE/AUTHORIZE LEASE -PURCHASE (MUNICIPAL CENTER)
City Administrator Toni:.0e0ge:0:••$et .f:orth the background on the
matter.
Egan moved, Wachter seconded, the. ,emotion to approve the
recommendation of the City staf:'to acq:u•ire the Kodak 235AF copier
through the three-year leaWpiUfoh:as:e:•:Qption and to direct the staff
to process the necessary a•g•foementte:: 1,11 voted in favor.
BANKING SERVICES AGREEMENT
City Administrator Tom Hedges informed the Council that at the
October 6, 1988, Council meeting staff was authorized to proceed with
the request for proposals.: 0.41T•ovide banking services for a
three-year period beginning *d:a111.14:'x•, 1., 1989. He stated the apparent
low provider was First Bank Eagan:
Wachter moved, Gustafson.seC<inded> the motion to designate First
Bank Eagan for the purpose •at. a ting as official depository and
providing various banking ' crevices to the City of Eagan for calendar
years 1989, 1990 and 1991: All voted in favor.
AMENDMENT TO CITY CODE/SWIMMING POOL FENCING
City Administrator TQm..H.e.d.9e,..,e.xp1ained the request for an
amendment to City Code re0ar4:p:t9:40itirig pool fencing. Councilmember
McCrea agreed there was a need for the amendment. Councilmember
Gustafson requested a minor chanq:e in Oat the fencing must be
installed by May 15, 1989. Mayor::llisoj agreed with this suggestion.
Egan moved, Wachter seconded, the:.:ttotion to approve an amendment
to the City Code that requires fencing for both existing and new
swimming pools with the exception of above -ground outdoor swimming
pools having at least four foot high vertical or outward inclined
sidewalls, with said fencing on existing swimming pools to be
installed by May 15, 1989. All voted ii:•,favor.
OFF-SALB• ;BBA:. LI.CEN:S:E/CUB FOODS
Wachter moved, Gustafson secon• de• d,. the motion to approve the
off -sale beer license for Cub Foods a :1 iff Lake Galleria. All voted
in favor.
Page 11/EAGAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES
November 15, 1988
•
CLARIFICATIONS OF::ThAILWAY/EN .ROMS DEERWOOD ADDITION
City Administrator Torn.: , gO:$::: ;formed the Council the trailway
had not been constructed to data 'arid that the developer was
requesting consideration by the City Council to eliminate that
condition of the final plat as it was concerned for the safety of the
children in the neighborhood. He further stated that the Director of
Parks and Recreation had aks.o addressed the trailway issue and raised
some concerns regarding it,s• xiigta & : ;Q i.
Bob Engstrom outlined his Ccs'ncerns•. regarding the trail and
stated it would be too dangero a..
Councilmember Egan g40:4nect :';;' :the trailway would be
jeopardized. Mr. Colbert tacapped•'the history. Mr. Engstrom stated
the grading was poor. Mayor Ellison favored Mr. Engstrom's proposal.
Buffy Mobroten (salesperson in area) stated the buyers' were
opposed and outlined their problem.
Steve Barthlet (Lot :17 .. a.s:..concerned with the family
environment.
Howard Kyllo stated that,the..oh:�::en to the west walked to
school. Councilmember Wachtel•, .sta cd ':ithat if there were no trail, the
children would cross the;t::�••.tpuncilmember Egan stated he felt
there was a real safety i:s:s•Ue.
Egan moved, Gustafson seconded, the motion to approve the
removal of a trailway connection from Pilot Knob Road to Deerwood
Addition as a condition of final platting. Engstrom. Gustafson,
Ellison, Egan and McCrea :F ?fled :iI:::V:a .c . Wachter abstained.
VARIANCE/COUNTRY HOLLOW. APDITIQN/PROGRESS LAND COMPANY
Community Development Direct: or Dale Runkle presented the matter
to the Council.
Warren Israelson (applicant) expressed his concerns regarding
the loss of the trees. Mayor Ellison questioned why the street was so
far south. The applicant stated because of the ponding to the north.
Mr. Colbert questioned the developer'sprogress.
Wachter moved, Egan seconded, themotion to continue the
ten -foot front yard setba •.:vA: an e::.for Lots 3 through 11, Block 3
and a five-foot front yard:':IdebAct•••var •ance for Lot 12, Block 3,
Country Hollow Addition to the December..6, 1988, Council meeting. All
voted in favor.
Page 12/EAGAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES
November 15, 1988
. •...•• . .
• • • •
%: •
VARIANCE/RHp ASSOCIATES..40INT VENTURE I
Community Developmentof-:04ie Runkle summarized the matter
for the Council. '
Richard Natala (applicant) explained the request, the hardship
and the location for the variance.
City Administrator Tom:1161d4Otafed there was a procedural
point. Mr. Sheldon stated-thet0.ii?as nq'provision for a variance in
the sign ordinance. Mr. Wachtet state..$e felt the sign would be seen
on Cliff Road.
Wachter moved, Gust4g00. ...e10.1:00!..4 the motion to deny the
50 -foot variance to the pylon sigh,4tight as requested by RHC
Associates Joint Venture I for Outlot E, Cliff Lake Center. All voted
in favor.
WAIVER OF PLAT/MERITOR CORPORATION/LEXINGTON SQUARE 4TH
ADDITION/LEXINGTON SQUARE 7TH ADDITION
Community Development' bix:04#0z..Dale Runkle stated that the
request for the waiver of the.gat:41thild rectify an error in the plat
surveys by shifting a lot liAe to thp.:06rth approximately 14 feet at
the right-of-way. He stated the-4P4commended approval.
The applicant was no#4teSent at the meeting.
Egan moved, McCrea seconded, the motion to approve the waiver of
plat for Meritor Development Company to relocate common property
lines between Lot 1, Block 1, Lexington Square 7th Addition and Lots
1 and 2, Block 2, Lexington. 5v.p.te 4th. Addition, subject to the
.... . .
following conditions:
1. The granting of an addi4Onal *ainage and utility easement
covering five feet north of the:Aew k4erty line.
..•.•
2. No sideyard setback variances :&fiall be allowed on Lot 1,
Block 1, Lexington Square 7th Addition.
3. Parcel A shall be combined with Lot 1, Block 2, Lexington
Square 4th Addition and Parcel B shall_be combined with Lot 2, Block
2, Lexington Square 4th Addition.
All voted in favor. . • . • ... • .. • . .•:•:•:••••••
.. .. . .. . . . . . :•.• . . • ... • .
i•:::::*:.
Page 13/EAGAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES
November 15, 1988
WAIVER OF PLAT/NATIONAL::CQMPUTER SYSTEMS/EAGANDALE INDUSTRIAL PARK
1ST ADDITION
Community Development Director Dale Runkle introduced the matter
to the Council.
Bob Worthington (Opus) stated he had a concern regarding
proposed condition number 1. a4ing ;pze-payment of the assessments.
He stated the County allowe4:t'he. oe onto Lone Oak and that Opus
would dedicate easements. He pre:Sentec •diagrams of the site. He
stated Opus would not protest the assessments when the improvement
was made and requested deferral•••'; until ••ghat time.
Councilmember Egan q:s:. tihed -t:ti:e• County's plan for Lone Oak.
Mr. Colbert stated it was not in the'five-year plan. Mayor Ellison
felt the Council should not play favorites. Councilmember McCrea
stated that perhaps the Council should examine the policy.
McCrea moved, Egan seconded, the motion to approve the waiver of
plat for Opus Corporation/Na .thwest Mutual Life to split Lots 6 and
17, Block 4, Eagandale Indttz i.4.park 1st Addition, for National
Computer Systems located along" th.0:'•iipr:th side of Lone Oak Road and
west of Eagandale Boulevard $n the '•sout.hwest quarter of Section 3,
subject to the following conditions:::•.
1. The development a004:pt: the financial obligations as
identified for the benefii: 'received from Lone Oak Road, the benefit
received from the existing sanitary sewer along the north side of
Lone Oak Road, and the construction of an 8' wide bituminous trailway
consistent with existing zoning of the proposed development and in
accordance with the City of Eagan's Comprehensive Trailway Plan.
2. The development i:6•: rep&rrs;be••:for dedicating the appropriate
public utility easement for the::oposed water main system for the
National Computer Systems develQpinent.:::,.':
3. The development is responsibleor the adjustment of and
damage to any existing City utility sy's'tem associated with site
development.
4. All utilities necessary to provide service to this
development shall be designed by a regi:stered professional engineer
in accordance with City Codes and engi;,ering standards and policies
and approved by staff prior to.building permit issuance.
5. A detail grading, ti:M:i•riAge•;' erosion and sediment control plan
must be prepared in accordance with City standards and approved by
staff prior to issuance of the buildir c permit.
Page 14/EAGAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES
November 15, 1988
6. If any public impr:bvements are to be installed under a City
Contract, the appropriate: •:project mus:t::be approved by Council action
prior to issuance of the 'b:44:jlding pe:>rm:it.
7. The development is r'e• Fg:u bie for the acquisition of all
regulatory agency permits in the time frame required by the affected
agency prior to issuance of the building permit.
8. The development is required to provide a 30' parking setback
for a distance of 300' noz:•t# ct4: ZOW0Alit Road.
9. No part of Parcel A may :be spl:it or transferred without the
approval of the City Council.
•
•
All voted in favor. .
RE-ZONING/PRELIMINARY PLAT/THOMAS SLATER ADDITION
Community Development Director Dale Runkle updated the Council
on the matter and stated that the APC recommended approval.
Wachter moved, Egan::se onded, the motion to approve the
re -zoning of 1.58 agricultur'ei.40 to an R-1 (single family)
district in the Thomas G. Slater AtMrdi'fipn. All voted in favor.
Wachter moved, Gustafso:;':recgc#c}d•d, the motion to approve a
preliminary plat consisti;p:g: •A"Tots located north of Rusten Road
and Storland Avenue in th:e ••southwest quarter of Section 31, subject
to the standard conditions of plat approval as adopted by Council
action on September 15, 1987, shall be complied with: B-1, B-2, B-3,
B-4, C-1, C-2, C-5, D-1, E-1, F-1, and G-1. All voted in favor.
RE-ZONINGt4$HOMAAJI4K •.,CENTER ADDITION
Gustafson moved, Wachter se.eonded•r. the motion to continue the
take Center Addition, from
single family to public facility'•,:for W.1 No. 13 to the December 6,
1988, City Council meeting. All":•ttotedn favor.
CITY ATTORNEY UPDATE
City Attorney Jim Sheldon updated the Council on the status of
pending litigation and other legal math::ers.
PROJECT 543/SKYLINE DRIVE/SIBLEY HILLS DRIVE UPGRADING (PRETTYMAN
HEIGHTS) • • • • •
Public Works Director Tom Colbert....briefly reviewed the
assessment options to the Council. He',also outlined the formula used
to determine the amount of area asses:siltent. He answered questions
from the Council regarding the benefits, location, etc. Councilmember
Page 15/EAGAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES
November 15, 1988
Egan was concerned with the landownerifAn the interior. Councilmember
Wachter felt it was a loqjigal approa0t: There was much Council
discussion regarding the tigj:cy. Maypt:Ellison suggested a
neighborhood meeting follot44jW:thk::.Public hearing. City
Administrator Hedges suggest4d.pkOceeding by setting up a meeting
with the neighbors and scheduling a public hearing for December 20,
1988. He stated the matter could be further discussed at the Special
Council Meeting. He recommended delaying the sending of the notices
until after the November 22,1988, meeting.
Egan moved, Wachter secOn44,-the:gtotion to receive the draft
feasibility report for Project 443 (Stjaey Hills Drive/Skyline Drive
- Streets and Utilities) and sc4Oule,a,public hearing to be held on
December 20, 1988. All voted in :Zavor4.*/
PROJECi 84:-KKIHWi.ON HEIGHTS
Gustafson moved, Egan seconded, the motion to accept the streets
and utilities installed within Hampton Heights under Project 85 -KK.
All voted in favor.
HI64M.AND ASSOCIATES
Egan moved, Wachter secqdd, :the motion to cancel the contract
with Hickock and Associates t perfpr*:0e water quality management
plan and related engineering 1U]. voted in favor.
-PARICING BAN
The policy for the snow removal parking ban was discussed with
the suggestion that violators would receive a warning after the first
violation; a tag after the second violation and a tag and tow after
the third violation.
PETITION/UkINPION 6130NTE/TRAILWAY
It was agreed that the concftion regarding the trailway would
remain as originally approved.
BERRYRIDGE ADDITION
Wachter moved, Egan seconded, the motion to assume the cost of
approximately $6,000.00 to extend the .!,,!.ter main in the Berryridge
Addition to meet City standards. All vetted in favor.
GHTS
Wachter moved, Gustafson seconded.c-the motion to declare the
Highview Park lights surplus property4nd negotiate a sale to the
City of Rosemount. All voted in favor.:'—'
Page 16/EAGAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES
November 15, 1988
• • • • • • • •
• • • .„
RECV4ING EMPLOYEE/INTERN
•:: . • . • .
McCrea moved, Egan sect:40011i the motion to authorize the
employment of an intern to asit&t:in the recycling program for
approximately nine months in 1989. All voted in favor.
COUNSEL DISCUSSIONS
Councilmember Gustaf000:#044 he felt the McCarthy article
was unfair and that the City ShO4d.re4pond. Councilmember Egan
reminded the Council of the noise symposium meeting. Councilmember
McCrea stated she felt the meettAgs were becoming too long.
.. • • • s
• .
H• • / BUIS
Wachter moved, Egan seconded, the motion to approve the
checklists dated October 31, 1988, in the amount of $2,051,098.02 and
dated November 15, 1988, in the amount of $842,333.61. All voted in
favor.
• —waqpIRNmENT
Upon motion duly made byWaCht641.seconded by Egan, the meeting
was adjourned at 12:30 a.m. All voted it favor.
OF EAGAN
• •
•