Loading...
05/10/1998 - City Council SpecialSPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING I. ROLL CALL II. INTRODUCTORY COMMENTS /DAKOTA COUNTY ASSESSOR'S OFFICE III. PARCEL REVIEWS /DAKOTA COUNTY ASSESSORS OFFICE IV. OTHER BUSINESS V. ADJOURNMENT TUESDAY MAY 10, 1988 6:30 P.M. BOARD OF EQUALIZATION MEMO TO: HONORABLE MAYOR & CITY COUNCILMEMBERS FROM: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES DATE: MAY 6, 1988 SUBJECT: BOARD OF EQUALIZATION The annual Board of Equalization meeting for the City of Eagan sponsored by Dakota County is scheduled for this coming Tuesday, May 10, 1988, at 6:30 p.m. The City Council is required to have a quorum and open the Board of Equalization meeting promptly at 6:30 p.m. A representative of the Dakota County Assessor's office will then make introductory comments to any and all residents in attendance and answer general questions about the method of calculating market value, assessable value and most importantly, the property tax. Once general questions have concluded, residents will have an opportunity to meet with an employee of the Assessor's office and review in private their parcel and raise any questions regarding their property tax statement at that time. There could be a number of residents present given the high percent of increase on market value for various parcels throughout the community. Enclosed is a letter from the State's Department of Revenue addressing the issue of the large number of taxpayers in Dakota County who have objected to their valuation increases. The County Assessor will ask that each resident when entering the Council Chambers on Tuesday sign on a sheet and that will be the order in which the residents can meet with an employee of the Assessor's office. The Statutory Handbook for Minnesota Cities provides a brief summary of the responsibilities for City Councils when holding a Board of Equalization and I have included a copy for that document for your review. Enclosed are two (2) letters addressed to the Board of Equalization for City Council review. The original letters will be turned over to the Dakota County Assessor at the meeting on Tuesday. City Administrator April 29, 1988 Thanks! Sincerely, Aliztips MPW:smc Michael P. Wandmacher, Director Local Government Review Division STATE OF MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE Mail Station 3340 St. Paul, MN 55146 -3340 TO: Mayors and Town Clerks in Dakota County The Department of Revenue has been receiving phone calls from a number of taxpayers in Dakota County regarding valuation increases put on their property by the State of Minnesota. Valuation increases were put on some types of property in some jurisdictions for the 1987 assessment by the State Board of Equalization. These increases were necessary because the minimum acceptable level of assessment of 90 percent of market value was not attained. Enclosed is a copy of the order which put these valuation increases on certain property for the 1987 asessment. If a taxpayer feels that his or her property has been overvalued for the 1987 assessment as a result of a state ordered increase the county assessor can explain to the taxpayer the appeal and abatement procedures. The local board of review should not address complaints regarding the 1987 assessment. The local board of review has jurisdication only over the 1988 assessment. The local board can not change any 1987 assessment. The State Board of Equalization has not yet reviewed the 1988 assessment and no increases have been ordered by the Board up to this point. Therefore, questions regarding the valuation or classification of properties for the 1988 assessment will have to be addressed by the local board of review and the county assessor's office. The State Revenue Department does not have assessment information on specific parcels of property and so we are unable to help taxpayers when they call us with questions. We would appreciate it if you would mention these facts at your local board :,f review since there does appear to be confusion on the part of many taxpayers as to where to go for answers about the assessment on their specific parcel of property. We are happy to answer any questions of a general nature that taxpayers may have regarding assessment, the property tax system or the State Board of Equalization. Our phone number is (612)642 -0472. cc: Seymour Olson, Dakota County Assessor AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER r•rm Fr 5-t IRev. 7/ 87) County -wide To the Auditor of DAKOTA The Commissioner of Revenue does hereby certify that this form and the following schedules consisting of -- 3 Vpages are a true artcl official copy of all changes (including any values on Form PT 54C) in the assessment of real and personal property pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 270.13. The County Assessor is hereby directed to enter upon the assessment rolls of his county for 1997 these change! (including any values on Form PT 54C) pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 273.061, Subdivision 9. Thu; it nor of the State Board of Equalization and cannot be appealed to the Minrosota Tex Court. Mlrinasota Commlaloner of Ravenua Except: City of: STATE BOARD CHANGES OF REAL AND PERSONAL PROPERTY VALUES FOR 1882 Assessment District Farmington, West St. Paul, Burnsville, Fagan, Lakeville, IVlcndota Ileights, Apple Valley, Hastings, Northfield Lakeville, Mendota Heights, Apple Valley, lIastings Lilydale West. `;l. Paul T own s hip of: Vcr•rnillion Minnesota Department of Revenue — Property Tex Review Division St. Paul, Minnesota 55146 -3340 (612) 642 -0474 Date County November 13, 1987 Classification and Kind nd, Structures) of Property Commercial-Industrial Land and Structures Commercial- Industrial Land and Structures Residential Land and Structures Apartments braid and Structures Residential Lend and Structures Per Cent ✓ Increase 4 15% Per Cent Decrease NOTE Each utility owning properly within your county may receive the lower assessment rate provided for Cleas 3e property for only ono parcel of property That parcel whim r aI,lies for the lower eseesamont rate may also receive the Smell Business I r Tr erq t ■on Credit as provided in M S 271 , t it concerning the tax laws in which the amount in controversy does not exceed $2,500, including penalties and interest. " At the same time that notice of the assessment, determination, or order of the commissioner or the appropriate unit of government is given to a taxpayer, the taxpayer must be notified in writing of his rights to appeal to the tax court, and if applicable, to the small claims division. In any notice of assessment, determination or order dealing with property valuation or assessment for property tax purposes, the taxpayer must be notified in writing that an appeal must be made to the town or city board of equalization and to the county board of equalization before appealing to the small claims division of the tax court, except for those taxpayers whose original assessments afr determined by the commissioner of revenue.' Summary It will be seen that assessments are subject to review by the city, the county board of equalization, and the state board of equalization. Further review in the courts is also possible after the assessment and tax levy process has resulted in a tax liability. B. LOCAL GOVERNMENT AID Generally, local government aid is a state aid to local governments, which the legislature enacted in 1971 and amended to its present form. The local government aid program has replaced most of theindividual taxes,such as cigarette,liquor, bank ex- cise, and gross earnings taxes which were previously distributed to local governments under various laws. The Legislature in 1983 made extensive changes to the formula for distributing the aid. The Commissioner of Revenue must notify taxing authorities of their aid amounts for the following year, as well as the data factors used to calculate their aid amount, by August 15 of each year. Cities who disagree with the Commissioner's calculations have 60 days to appeal the certifi- cation. See Appendix L for more detailed calcula- tion information. The total appropriation for aid distribution to cities in calendar year 1984 is $246.2 million. The formula is intended to reflect a city's fiscal need minus its fiscal capacity. Each city's preliminary aid amount will be equal to its local revenue base minus the product of 10 mills times the city's equalized assessed valuation. (Local Revenue Base) minus (10 mills X Equalized Assessed Valuation) = 1984 Preliminary Local Government Aid. -312 The preliminary aid amount cannot be greater than 106 percent of the 1983 local government aid, or Tess than the 1983 aid minus the amount raised in the city by three - quarters mills times the equalized assessed value. Finally, all the aid amounts will probably have to be proportionally adjusted since the total appropriation will probably be inadequate to "fully fund" the formula. A city's equalized assessed valuation is defined as its previous year's taxable valuation, adjusted for fiscal disparities in the metropolitan area and minus the captured value in any tax increment financing district, divided by the city's aggregate sales ratio covering the period ending two years prior to the year of aid distribution. A city's sales ratio is a percentage figure employed by the Department of Revenue that essentially is derived by dividing the assessor's market value figure by the actual selling price for property sold during the year. This sales ratio is designed to equalize the assessed value of property in one taxing juris- diction to make it comparable with other taxing jurisdictions throughout the state. This figure is very significant to cities and the legislature in 1983 has made it easier for a city to appeal the sales ratio determination. While the administrative framework of the appeal procedure is not yet in place, the law provides that no sales ratio study shall be conclusive or binding on a court; and allows any party to introduce evidence of its unrelia- bility including, but not limited to, evidence of inade- quate adjustmentof sale pricesfor terms of financing. A city's local revenue base (the fiscal need factor) is calculated differently depending on whether its population is greater or less than 2,500. For cities over 2,500 start with the local revenue base used in the 1981 formula minus any amount added to that base for bonded debt for streets, curbs, gutters, storm sewers, and bridges. The resulting figure is then multiplied by a factor of 1.208 (inflation factor) and also by a factor equal to the estimated 1981 population divided by the 1980 census population provided the factor is greater than 1.0 (population growth factor). To this figure add the amount certified for 1983 attached machinery aid payments, the amount certified for 1983 reduced assessment credit payments, plus any amount which would have been received in 1983 under the reduced assess- ment credit statute for a project approved by the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency (MHFA), the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), or the Farmers Home Ad- ministration (FmHA) prior to March 1,1983 had the project been completed and subject to taxation based upon full market value for taxes payable in 1983. 1983 review after being duly notified of the board's intent to raise the assessment of his or her pro- perty, or if a person feeling aggrieved by an assess- ment fails to apply for a review of the assessment, he or she may not appear before the county board of equalization for a review of the assessment, except when an assessment was made subsequent to the meeting of the board of review or when it can be established that notice, of the market value was not received at (east, five days before the local board of review meeting. The local board of review may not reduce the total or aggregate amount of the assessment retuned by the county assessor by more than 1 %.' This means that compensation must be made for reductions in assessed values by making comparable increases in assessments against other parcels of property. After the final adjournment of the board of review, the city assessor is authorized to make additional assessments but the board cannot make further review. Complaints on these later assess- ments can be heard by the county board of equa ization. County Board of Equalization The county board of equalization is composed of either the_sounty auditor and the county comrnissioners or a special board of equalization appointed by the auditor and the board of county commissioners. County boards of equalization are to meet commencing the first Monday following the fourth day of July, or if the first Monday following the fourth day of July is a legal holiday, the first Tuesday following the fourth day of July, and complete their work on or before the tenth follow- ing working day, when it must adjourn. No action taken subsequent to adjournment shall be valid unless a longer session period is approved by the commissioner of revenue who can extend the session period to August 10. Although the county board of equalization may decrease and, after notice to the taxpayer, increase individual valuations, its primary task is to equalize the ratio between market value and assessed market value in the various districts. The board's main purpose is to secure uniformity of assessed value from district to district with only occasional attention to uniformity 3 tween taxpayers within any one of the districts. It may not reduce the aggregate valuations of either real or personal -311 property in the county below the amounts re- turned to it by the assessors, but it may increase these amounts. Upon application by the owner, the board may change a property's homestead classification or reduce its market value by as much as $39, reducing or refunding any taxes levied or paid. The State Board of Equalization The commissioner of revenue sits as the state board of equalization ancLacts in this capacity on August 15 in each year. The commissioner's primary assessment task is to secure uniformity of valuations between counties, although authority is also given to make adjustments of valuations between districts in counties and between classes of property. The commissioner may also raise or lower individual assessments, but may increase individual assessments only after the taxpayer has been notified and given an opportunity to be heard. In this capacity, the commissioner may not reduce the aggregate value of all property in the state by more than one percent below the total reported by the county boards of equalization. The commissioner may order a reassessment of property In any district in which it is deemed necessary. Appeal to the Tax Court The tax court is the sole, exclusive and final authority for the hearing and determination of all questions of law and facts arising under the pro- perty tax laws of thp,state, except for an appeal to the Supreme Court. The tax court has jurisdic- tion in cases dealing with property taxes only after the taxpayer has appealed the valuation or assess- ment to the town or city board of review, and to the county board of equalization, except for those taxpayers whose original assessments deter- mined by the commissioner of revenue. The tax court has no jurisdiction involving an order of the state board of equalization unless a taxpayer contests the valuation of his property. The tax court is required to hold hearings at any place in the state so that taxpayers may appear before the court with as little inconvenience and expense to the taxpayer as is practicable. The tax court is to be allowed to use the district corrr and county courtroom in all of the counties. The small claims division of the tax court has jurisdiction in any case concerning the valuation, assessment, or taxation of residential property homesteaded by the taxpayer; or any other case formerly considered exempt, the legislature has authorized the taxation of state -owned residential property in the same manner and to the same extent 4 as privately owned property of a like nature. Local governments in Minnesota may not exempt any and from taxation for the purpose of attracting or keeping industry 4 The governing body of a city, however, may offer a developer a deferral of property tax on property improvements during the construction period until the improve- ments are constructed and 50 percen; of the area of the building becomes occupied. S Once the improvements are constructed and 50 percent occupied, the developer will be subject to the full property tax plus the property tax on the property at the time for which the deferral was applied, multiplied by the number of years the deferral was granted during the construction period. Equalization Procedures Once the assessor has completed his or her work, ;t is reviewed and, within limitations, modified at the city, county, and state levels of government. During this review procedure, two kinds of cor- rections are made: (1) the assessor's lists are checked for accuracy, individual complaints are heard, and any necessary adjustments are made; and (2) the ratio of market to assessed market values is equalized. The first of these functions is the sole concern of the city board of review while the county and state boards devote a greater percentage of their time to the latter task. When the entire procedure has been completed, the county auditor puts the valuations upon his or her records for use in making up the tax rate figures. Only when the assessments have been reviewed and equalized by all three levels of government do they become the official assessed values for tax purposes. The City Board of Review The city council may serve as the board of review in cities which have been separated from the town. In cities which have not been separated from the town for assessment and election pur- poses, the town board serves as the board of review. The city council may appoint a special board of review to which it may delegate all of the powers and duties the coy�ncil would have if it acted as the board of review. The members of the special - 310 board of review serve at the direction and dis- cretion of the council. The council determines the number of members to be appointed, the com- pensation and expenses to be paid, and the term of office of each member. At least one member of the special board of review must be an appraiser, realtor or other person familiar with property valuations in the assessment district. The board of review meets in the office of the city clerk. The city assessor and the county assessor must also attend this meeting with their assessment books and papers. These latter officials may take part in the proceedings, but may not vote. The meeting date of the board of review, which must be between April 1 and June 30, is fixed by the county assessor on or before April 1 of each year by giving written notice to the city clerk. Upon receipt of the notice, the clerk must give published and posted notice of the meeting at least 10 days before the date set for it. A majority of the members may take action at the board of review meeting and may adjourn the meeting from day to day for a period of 20 days until the work of the board has been completed. After 20 days from the date of its first meeting, the board has no authority and any action taken is invalid unless the commissioner of revenue has granted an extension. In fulfilling its role, the board of review has three main functions to perform: 1. It must review the assessor's list, making sure that all taxable property in the city has been properly placed upon it. 2. It must review the assessor's valuations, striving to standardize the ratio between market value and adjusted market value for each individual piece of property. To accomplish this, the board may raise or lower valuations on individual properties, but increases in valuations cannot be made without first notifying the property owner and giving him an opportunity to be heard. 3. The board must hear and settle the com- plaints of individual property owners regarding the valuations which have been placed upon their property. If a person fails to appear in person, by counsel, or by written communication before the board of 5 12-/F - g- 1(-10 c LM--' e 7 71 (64,4 / 7 - y ■ Vi,frtzle- 4-5 -4( /S / 7-77cs 6 77 yo -›-v As 9 Lv c9- t 2 ° D e3e / 0 ni e G - 790 - 0 0 I, eii.41),5.1e4do -74 4—ll—e.14; May 3, 1988 City of Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Rd. Eagan, Mn. 55123 Dear Board of Review, GBL /dgl HASTINGS APPLE VALLEY INVER GROVE 3`aE 7 /ITH !JS — First Ft - 3;Hcc 1 Re: Appeal of Assessors Valuation Parcel # 10- 53800 - 104 -02 10- 53800 - 105 -02 10- 53800 - 108 -02 Oakwood Heights Condominiums First Federal is requesting that the assessors value of the above referenced properties be changed to reflect true market values. We own the above units and have them priced for sale with Coldwell Banker as follows: 1. 10- 53800 - 104 -02 919 Oakwood Hgts. 2. 10- 53800 - 105 -02 933 Oakwood Hgts. 3. 10- 53800 - 108 -02 921 Oakwood Hgts. list at $56,900. expect sale at $55,000. assessors value $67,100. list at $61,500. expect sale at $59,700. assessors value $72,100. list at $56,900. expect sale at $55,000. assessors value $67,100. Over the past three years we have held and marketed units in this condo project as well as a similar project on Gold Trail in Eagan. Our expected sales prices are realistic as supported by the realtors comparables. The condo owners at the Gold Trail project were success- ful in getting a reduction last year with the help and expense of a tax consultant. We should not have to waste the time or money to duplicate this procedure in this case. Your cooperation will be greatly appreciated. 1320 SOUTH FRONTAGE ROAD 14998 GLAZIER AVENUE 6505 CAHILL AVENUE EAST Very trul yours, G•'or e B /Loban President PHONE 437.6169 PHONE 432 -6840 PHONE 455 -1553 31JlLD '."11141 F JT1;:'E ii74D Y UR Cu'1MUNIT i 'S Ft7TURE ,,,��, ,,,_,....... —.... ADDRESS — ..... STYLE —..._. SO FT _. -. RMS BED HMS i BATHS FAM T GAR AGE MILES TO SUBJECT DAYS ON MARKET ORIGINAL LIST PRICE CURRENT LIST PRICE FINANCING OFFERED Covington TH 808 4 2 1 no 2 81 3 mi 7 57,5 same all Blue Jay cando Conventional 834 4 1 1 no 1 85 2 mi 6 59,899same 145 all Golfview cando 50, 925 5 2 1 no 1 83 2 mi 9 59,9 same all ADDRESS STYLE SO FT RMS BED RMS BATHS FAM GAR AGE MILES TO SUBJECT DAYS ON MARKET LIST PRICE SALES DAFE SALES PRICE FINANCING Golfview coldo 1 922 5 2 1 no 1 82 2 mi 110 59,9 12/:7 55, Conventional Silver Bellcoido 1012 5 2 2 no 1 81 2 mi 145 50, 12/87 50, FHA STYLE 50 F7 RMS BED RMS BATHS FAM GAR AGE DAYS ON MARKET ORIGINAL CURRENT LIST PRICE LIST PRICE FINANCING Condo 1052 5 2 2 no 1 1984 116 59,90J 59,90 Conventional 3420 1887 1784 3595 3425 A MEMBER OF THE SEARS FINANCIAL NET WORK FILE NO: TRANSFEREE: ADDRESS: 919 Oakwood Heights CITY ;STATErZIP Eagan, MN 55121 YOUR COMMENTS' BUYER'S COMMENTS TOTAL NO. OF SHOWINGS SINCE LAST REPORT: YOUR OFFICE TOTAL NO, OF SHOWINGS TO DATE: MONTHLY STATUS REPORT WHAT IS THE GENERAL APPEARANCE OF THE PROPERTY? DATE OF LAST CLEANING? 8323 -1006 (8,86) 538Del —/Or COLDWELL BANKER RELOCATION MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC. good DATE BROKER 2/15/88 DATE INSPECTED 2/12 PHONE( 612 ) Coldwell Banker INSPECTED BY: 452 - 0250 1 OTHER OFFICES 0 YOUR OFFICE 6 OTHER OFFICES 1 MARKETABILITY OF SUBJECT (POSITIVES, NEGATIVES, RECOMMENDATIONS — COMMENT ON LOCATION, ARCHITECTURAL STYLE. FLOOR PLAN, ECONOMIC CONDITIONS. ETC) The only problem we still see is too many renters versus homeowners and the market is slow. This unit shows well. IN YOUR OPINION. WHAT ACTION IS NECESSARY TO SELL THIS HOUSE IN THE NEXT 60 DAYS? (THE INFORMATION ABOVE SHOULD SUPPORT YOUR REQUEST) We may try to organize an open house promotion and drawing with all the units we have listed at Oakwood and Gold Point. YOUR RECOMMENDED LIST PRICE _ 56,900 MOST LIKELY FINANCING Cony or C/D PROBABLE SALES PRICE 55,000 WMIe - PW IIOFO Canary-FM WA - EEOFer Gary Noreen Adams ADDRESS STYLE SO FT RMS BED RMS BATHS FAM GAS AGE MILES TO SUBJECT DAYS ON MARKET ORIGINAL LIST PRICE CURRENT LIST PRICE FINANCING OFFERED Covington TH 808 4 2 1 no 2 81 3 mi 7 57,5 same all Blue Jay condo Conventional 834 4 1 1 no 1 85 2 mi 6 59,899same 145 all Golfview condo 50, 925 5 2 1 no 1 83 2 mi 9 59,9 same all ADDRESS STYLE SO FT RMS BED HMS BATHS FAM GAR AGE MILES TO SUBJECT DAYS ON MARKET LIST PRICE SALES DATE SALES PRICE FINANCING Golfview condo 2 922 5 2 1 no 1 82 2 mi 110 59,9 12/87 55, Conventional Silver Bellcoldo 1012 5 2 2 no 1 81 2 mi 145 50, 12/87 50, FHA STYLE SO FT RMS BED RMS BATHS FAM GAR AGE DAYS ON MARKET ORIGINAL LIST PRIDE CURRENT LIST PRICE FINANCING condo 1075 5 2 2 no 1 '84 116 59,90 59,9)0 _ o; yi�±f �. a�1FS; �. as.. �r� > 3420 1887 1784 3595 3425 A MEMBER OF THE SEARS FINANCIAL NETWORK COLDW@LL 9ANI R© CITY /STATE /ZIP: Eagan, MN SUBJECT PROPERTY (Include photocopy of Listing sheet from MLS book.) MOST RECENT COMPARABLE SALES MOST RECENT COMPETITIVE PROPERTIES TOTAL NO. OF SHOWINGS TO DATE YOUR OFFICE YOUR RECOMMENDED LIST PRICE 56,900 RS23 -1006 (8 86) - /D 31 - /of— D MONTHLY STATUS REPORT COLOWELL BANKER RELOCATION MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC FILE NO. DATE 2/15/88 TRANSFEREE: BROKER: Coldwell Banker ADDRESS 92 1 Oakwood Heights Cr. No. DATE INSPECTED: 2 INSPECTED BYNoreen Adams PHONE 612 ) 452 -0250 YOUR COMMENTS' 6 OTHER OFFICES BUYER'S COMMENTS TOTAL NO OF SHOWINGS SINCE LAST REPORT YOUR OFFICE 1 OTHER OFFICES 0 1 MARKETABILITY OF SUBJECT (POSITIVES, NEGATIVES, RECOMMENDATIONS — COMMENT ON LOCATION, ARCHITECTURAL STYLE, FLOOR PLAN, ECONOMIC CONDITIONS, ETC ) WHAT IS THE GENERAL APPEARANCE OF THE PROPERTY? Fair DATE OF LAST CLEANING') IN YOUR OPINION. WHAT ACTION IS NECESSARY TO SELL TFIIS HOUSE IN THE NEXT 60 DAYS? (THE INFORMATION ABOVE SHOULD SUPPORT YOUR REQUEST) We may try to have a special Open House promotion with the Oakwood and Gold Point units. MOST LIKELY FINANCING Cony or C / ROBABLE SALES PRICE c5, 000 Wnee - PoRlola Conar y - Flle Pmk - Broker Copy m —v• ••___--• __•-.-- ADDRESS --- - -_- STYLE _ 5O FT HMS 8E0 RMS OATHS FAM GAR AGF MILES TO SUBJECT DAYS ON MARKET ORIGINAL LIST PRICE CURRENT LIST PRICE FINANCING OFFERED Covington TH 806 4 2 1 no 2 81 3 mi 7 57,5 same all Blue Jay condc Conventional 834 4 1 1 no 1 85 2 mi 6 59,899same all Golfview oondc 12/E7 925 5 2 1 no 1 83 2 mi 9 59,9 same_ all mvV• ,—vc•-• v_.--. ADDRESS STYLE 5O FT HMS BED RMS BATHS FAM GAR AGE MILES TO SUBJECT DAYS ON MARKET LIST PRICE SALES DATE SALES PRICE FINANCING Golfview ccndo 2 922 5 2 1 no 1 82 2 mi 110 59,9 12/E7 55, Conventional Silver Bellccndo 1012 5 2 2 no 1 81 2 mi 145 50, 12/E7 50, FHA STYLE SO FT HMS BED RMS BATHS FAM GAR AGE DAYS 014 MARKET ORIGINAL LIST PRICE CURRENT LIST PRICE FINANCING condo 1295 6 3 2 no 1 .84 116 63,5 63,5 342 188 178 359 342 A MEMBER OF THE SEARS FINANCIAL NETWORK coLowc_u FILE NO: TRANSFEREE' ADDRESS: CITY /STATE/ZIP 933 Oakwood Heights Eagan, MN LS book. YOUR COMMENTS BUYER'S COMMENTS TOTAL NO. OF SHOWINGS TO DATE: MONTHLY STATUS REPORT COLDWELL BANKER RELOCATION MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC. TOTAL NO OF SHOWINGS SINCE LAST REPORT. YOUR OFFICE DATE 2/15/88 BROKER' Coldwell Ranker DATE INSPECTED 2/12 INSPECTED BY Noreen Adams PHONE( 612 ) 452 -0250 1 /a S3P0=- /o; OTHER OFFICES 0 YOUR OFFICE 6 O THER OFFICES 1 MARKETABILITY OF SUBJECT (POSITIVES, NEGATIVES. RECOMMENDATIONS — COMMENT ON LOCATION, ARCHITECTURAL STYLE, FLOOR PLAN, ECONOMIC CONDITIONS, ETC ) WHAT IS THE GENERAL APPEARANCE OF THE PROPERTY'? Excellent DATE OF LAST CLEANING" IN YOUR OPINION, WHAT ACTION IS NECESSARY TO SELL THIS HOUSE IN THE NEXT 60 DAYS" (THE INFORMATION ABOVE SHOULD SUPPORT YOUR REQUEST) YOUR RECOMMENDED LIST PRICE 61 , 500 MOST LIKELY FINANCING' Cony or C /D PROBABLE SALES PRICE' 59,700 RS23 -1006 (8 While - Porlldo Canary - Fib Pok - Broker Copy ASSESSOR MARKET VALUE PROPERTY CLASSIFICATION ABBREVIATED PROPERTY DESCRIPTION MARKET VALUE RES— NCNHMSTD • 110- 55380CC-1C4 -02 CAKWCCD HEIGHTS UNIT 1 CONDO 7.42 INTEREST FILE 059 BEING PT CF LET 1 BLK 2 1 E 2 67,100 ASSESSOR PROPERTY CLASSIFICATION ABBREVIATED PROPERTY DESCRIPTION MARKET VALUE RES— NONHMSTD 110- 5380Q- 108-02 2 E 2 OAK4C00 HEIGHTS 67,100 CAKWCCO HEIGHTS CONDO UNIT B 8 GARAGE 0 G -8 7.52 INTEREST FILE 159 BEING. PT CF LCT 1 BLK 2 & 1 2 ASSESSOR MARKET VALUE PROPERTY CLASSIFICATION ABBREVIATED PROPERTY DESCRIPTION RES— NONHMSTD 10-53800-105-02 CAKhCO- 58 OAKW000 HEIGHTS CONGO UNIT 0 5 GARAGE 0 G-5 9.02 INTEREST FILE 059 BEING PT OF LOT 1 BLK 1 2 E 2 72,100 «:- rs!:kf� �a .'µs: «w.C.w.t+!'r.sS.z'..?. -,. �>✓5.:.::r"Ltu ::a�;+::i.� DAKOTA COUNTY ASSESSOR 1560 HIGHWAY 55 HASTINGS, MN 55033 438 -4200 NOTICE OF ASSESSMENT FOR THE YEAR 1988— [PAYABLE IN THE YEAR 1989] In making an appeal you may appear in person; send a letter or a representative to the meeting of your city or town board of review onTT N EE SSH�AY MAY 10TH. at 6:30 P. M. at EAGAN MUNICIPAL. C If you disagree with their decision, next you make an appeal by going in person or by sending a letter or a representative to the meeting of your county board or equalization in the Dakota County Government Center on TUESDAY JUNE 21,1988 AT 10:00 A. M FIRST FED S E ASSN 1320 FRCNTAGE RD S HASTINGS MN 55033 DAKOTA COUNTY ASSESSOR 1560 HIGHWAY 55 HASTINGS, MN 55033 438 -4200 NOTICE OF ASSESSMENT FOR THE YEAR 1988 — [PAYABLE IN THE YEAR 1689 ] In making an appeal you may appear in person; send a letter or a representative to the meeting of your city or town board of review on EESgDAY MAY 1CTH. a t E:30 P. M. at EAGAN MUNICIPAL CE If you disagree -with their decision, next you make an appeal by going in person or by sending a letter or a representative to the meeting of your county board or equalization in the Dakota County Government Center on TUESDAY JUNE 21, 1988 AT 10:00 A. M FIRST FED S E L ASSN •1320 FRONTAGE RD S HASTINGS MN 55033 DAKOTA COUNTY ASSESSOR 1560 HIGHWAY 55 HASTINGS, MN 55033 438 -4200 PRESORTED FIRST CLASS MAIL U.S. POSTAGE PAID PERMIT NO. 2 PRESORTED FIRST CLASS MAIL U S. POSTAGE PAID PERMIT NO. 2 PRESORTED FIRST CLASS MAIL U.S. POSTAGE PAID • PERMIT NO. 2 NOTICE OF ASSESSMENT FOR THE YEAR 1588 — [PAYABLE IN THE YEAR 1989 n making an appeal you may appear in person; send a letter or a representative to the meeting of your city or town board of review onTUF MAY 10TH. at 6:30 P. M. at EAGAN MUNICIPAL CEENT If you disagree with their decision, next you make an appeal by going in person or by sending a letter or a representative to the meeting of your county board or equalization in the Dakota County Government Center on TUESDAY JUNE 21,1988 AT 10:00 A. M FIRST FED S E L ASSN 1320 FRCNTAGE RD S HASTINGS MN 55033 T 0 a 5 m a a a N N n 0 0 0 0 0 N A (D C0 tD a ti 2 to Ob g V o 0 MEMO TO: FIRE CHIEF SOUTHORN FROM: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES DATE: APRIL 20, 1990 SUBJECT: SMOKE FREE ENVIRONMENT POLICY Please review the attached smoke free environment policy that was adopted by the City Council at the April 17 meeting. This policy will go into effect on June 1 for all three levels of the Municipal Center building and all public works and utility buildings. It has been the intention of the City Council that fire stations, including the Fire Administration building be included with this policy. I would like you to review the policy with the District Chiefs and other members of your department and let me know if there are any specific problems with this policy. q1 46 or City Administrator Enclosures cc: Assistant to the City Administrator Duffy TLH /jeh