The URL can be used to link to this page

07/10/2012 - Airport Relations CommissionAGENDA EAGAN AIRPORT RELATIONS COMMISSION MEETING EAGAN MUNICIPAL CENTER — EAGAN ROOM (2nd FLOOR) TUESDAY, JULY 10, 2012 7:00 P.M. I. ROLL CALL AND AGENDA ADOPTION II. APPROVAL OF MINUTES III. VISITORS TO BE HEARD IV. OLD BUSINESS A. Communications Update B. MAC Monthly Reports — Eagan/Mendota Heights Corridor Analysis/Technical Advisory Report/17-25 Departure Analysis Report V. NEW BUSINESS A. MAC Runway Use Analysis B. Noise Abatement Departure Profiles (NADP) VI. STAFF / COMMISSIONER REPORT A. 2012-2013 ARC Roster B. Runway 17 Westbound RNAV River Departure Procedure Implementation Update VII. ROUNDTABLE VIII. ADJOURNMENT IX. 2012-2013 WORK PLAN DEVELOPMENT Auxiliary aids for persons with disabilities will be provided upon advance notice of at least 96 hours. If a notice of less than 96 hours is received, the City of Eagan will attempt to provide such aid. AlkL- City of Eap ma TO: THE EAGAN AIRPORT RELATIONS COMMISSION FROM: DIANNE MILLER, ASSISTANT CITE' ADMINISTRATOR DATE: JULY 3, 2012 SUBJECT: AIRPORT RELATIONS COMMISSION MEETING / TUESDAY, JULY 10, 2012 The Eagan Airport Relations Commission will meet on Tuesday, July 10 at 7:00 p.m. in the Eagan Room. The Council Chambers are unavailable due to technology upgrades currently being installed. The ARC meeting will be televised live from the Eagan Room. Following the regular business portion of the meeting, the Commission will adjourn into a non - televised workshop to prepare the 2012 -2013 ARC Works Plan. To ensure a quorum is present, please contact Executive Assistant Cheryl Stevenson at 651/675- 5005 or estevenson�cit ag_ n.com if you are unable to attend the meeting. I. ROLL CALL AND ADOPTION OF THE AGENDA The agenda, as presented or modified, is in order for adoption by the Commission. Commissioners are encouraged to welcome Scott Johnson, who was appointed to a 2 -year term on the ARC by the City Council. II. APPROVAL OF MINUTES The minutes of the March 13, 2012 and May 8, 2012 Airport Relations Commission meetings are enclosed on pages H through (9 . These minutes, as presented or modified, are in order for adoption by the Commission. Due to the joint meeting with the airport commissions from the Cities of Mendota Heights and Inver Grove Heights, the March meeting minutes have not yet been considered. III. VISITORS TO BE HEARD The Eagan City Council and its Commissions set aside up to ten minutes at the beginning of public meetings to permit visitors to address items of interest that are not addressed on the regular agenda. Items that will take more than ten minutes or that require specific action can be scheduled for a future meeting agenda. Airport Relations Commission Meeting July 10, 2012 Page 2 IV. OLD BUSINESS A. Communications Update – It is the practice of the Airport Relations Commission to discuss their communication initiatives each month, which include articles in the Experience Eagan Newsletter, as well as stories aired on the City's local access cable channels. The Commission is welcome at this time to make additional suggestions for communication initiatives regarding airport issues. B. MAC Monthly Reports – Eagan /Mendota Heights Corridor Analysis /Technical Advisory Report /17 -35 Departure Analysis Report – Enclosed on pages 9 through is the May 2012 Eagan/Mendota Heights Corridor Analysis. Enclosed on pages 1'6 through 5- is the May 2012 Technical Advisory Report. Enclosed on pages ' 5B through 1 5 9 is the May 2012 Runway 17 Departure Analysis Report. Enclosed on pages Co 0 through (oul is the Crossing in the Corridor report for the month of May 2012. The May reports are the most current reports available on the MAC website. V. NEW BUSINESS A. MAC Runway Use Analysis — Enclosed on pages W S through is a Runway Use Analysis prepared by the MAC for review and discussion at the July 11 Noise Oversight Committee (NOC) meeting. The Commission is welcome to comment on the report and share any questions that may be appropriate to be raised at the NOC meeting. B. Noise Abatement Departure Profiles (NADP) —In follow up to the discussion at the May 8 joint meeting with the airport commissions from Mendota Heights and Inver Grove Heights, enclosed on pages ? 1 through 10 i is an analysis conducted by the MAC on the effects of NADP at MSP Airport. This analysis will be discussed at the July 11 NOC meeting. The Commission is welcome to comment on the report and share any questions that may be appropriate to be raised at the NOC meeting. VI. STAFF / COMMISSIONER REPORT A. 2012 -2013 ARC Roster — Enclosed on page 10 a is the 2012 -2013 ARC roster, which is also provided on the City's website. B. Runway 17 Westbound RNAV River Departure Procedure Implementation Update — Enclosed on pages 103 and Ins} is a memo prepared by Chad Leqve, MAC Manager— Noise, Environment and Planning, regarding the anticipated implementation of two RNAV river valley procedures on August 15, 2012. VII. ROUNDTABLE Per the request of the Commission, this agenda item has been added so that Commissioners have the opportunity to ask questions or make requests for future agenda items. 11 Airport Relations Commission Meeting July 10, 2012 Page 3 VIII. ADJOURNMENT The Commission is asked to adjourn the regular meeting, and reconvene in a Commission workshop. Per the request of the Commission, the Eagan ARC meetings will go no later than 8:30 p.m. unless agreed upon by the Commission. IX. 2012 -2013 WORK PLAN DEVELOPMENT In keeping with past practice, and at the request of Chair Thorkildson, dedicated time has been set aside to provide an informal opportunity for the Commission to brainstorm their 2012 -2013 ARC work plan for recommendation to the City Council this fall. Enclosed on page 105 is the 2011 -2012 approved ARC work plan. For planning purposes, according to the MAC, the FAA continues to expect the Area Navigation (RNAV) flight track maps to be released by the end of 2012, with the environmental process ensuing immediately following their release. Commission members are encouraged to bring suggestions to the workshop of items that could be considered for the 2012 -2013 work plan. Assistant City Administrator �j MINUTES OF THE EAGAN AIRPORT RELATIONS COMMISSION MEETING MARCH 13, 2012 A regular meeting of the Eagan Airport Relations Commission was held on Tuesday, March 13, 2012 at 7:00 p.m. Those present were Curtis Aljets, Luke Olson, Chuck Thorkildson, Carol Whisnant, Chad Stambaugh, and Dan Johnson. Absent was Steve Beseke. Also present was Assistant City Administrator Miller. AGENDA Aljets moved, Whisnant seconded a motion to approve the agenda as presented. All members voted in favor. APPROVAL OF MINUTES Whisnant made a motion to approve the minutes of the January 24, 2012 regular meeting of the Eagan Airport Relations Commission. Aljets seconded the motion. All members voted in favor. VISITORS TO BE HEARD There were no visitors to be heard. COMMUNICATIONS UPDATE Assistant City Administrator Miller noted that March 15, 2012 open house will be televised and replayed on local cable channe116, and will also be web streamed on the City of Eagan's Website. MAC MONTHLY REPORTS — EAGAN/MENDOTA HEIGHTS CORRIDOR ANALYSIS /TECHNICAL ADVISORY REPORT /17 -35 DEPARTURE ANALYSIS REPORT /CROSSING THE CORRIDOR REPORT Assistant City Administrator Miller introduced the January 2012 Eagan /Mendota Heights Corridor Analysis Report, the January 2012 Technical Advisory Report, the January 2012 Runway 17 Departure Analysis Report and January 2012 Crossing in the Corridor Report. Miller followed up with information regarding why December 2011 night time flights dropped off by 33 %, stating that two factors contributed to reduction: 1.) MAC was missing twenty two hours of track data which significantly impacted the results; and, 2.)Incidents of inclement weather in 2010 resulted in more delays of operations into the nighttime hours. The Commission discussed the results of the January 2012 reports. 2012 OPEN HOUSE AT THE FIRE SAFETY CENTER Assistant City Administrator Miller verified that the ABC's 2012 Open House will be held at the Fire Safety Center, Thursday, March 15, 2012 at 6:30 — 8:00 p.m. It was noted that the following persons would be in attendance at the open house: Chad Leqve, MAC Manger of Aviation and Satellite; John Nelson, MAC Noise Program Coordinator; and Dana Swanson, MAC Noise and Operations Analyst. It was also noted that a representative of the FAA will observe from the audience. `l" MAY 8, 2012 JOINT MEETING WITH MENDOTA HEIGHTS' AND INVER GROVE HEIGHTS' AIRPORT COMMISSIONS Assistant City Administrator Miller stated that a meeting has been scheduled with the Airport Relations Commissions from the Cities of Mendota Heights and Inver Grove Heights at 7 p.m. on May 8, 2012. The Commission discussed the format for the joint meeting. MAC ANNUAL NOISE CONTOUR ANALYSIS Assistant City Administrator Miller summarized the Annual Noise Contour Analysis prepared by the MAC, which compared the 2011 Actual Noise Contour and the 2007 Forecasted Noise Contour. The Commission discussed the analyses. MAC CRASH EXERCISE Assistant City Administrator Miller noted that the 2012 MAC Tri- annual crash exercise will be held on May 16, 2012. Commissioners are invited to participate. INVITATION TO MARCH 19, 2012 MAC MEETING Assistant City Administrator Miller noted that MAC Chairman Dan Boivin invited members of the NOC and the public to attend an offsite MAC meeting on March 19, 2012 in Minneapolis at 7:00pm. NOC REQUEST OF MAC RE: EFFECTS FROM AIRCRAFT NOISE Assistant City Administrator Miller summarized the NOC's request of MAC to consider sending letters to the Partnership for Air Transportation Noise and Emissions Reduction (PARTNER) and Airport Cooperative Research Program (ACRP) offering MSP airport as a prospective research site for their respective study efforts related to the health impact of airport noise. The Commission discussed the efforts of PARTNER and ACRP. ROUNDTABLE There were no additional items or comments. ADJOURNMENT Upon motion by Whisnant, seconded by Aljets, the meeting adjourned at 7:50 p.m. All members voted in favor. Date Secretary MINUTES OF THE EAGAN AIRPORT RELATIONS COMMISSION MEETING MAY 8, 2012 A joint meeting of the Eagan Airport Relations Commission was held on Tuesday, May 8, 2012 at 7:00 p.m. with the Airport Relations Commissions from the cities Mendota Heights and Inver Grove Heights. Those present from the Eagan ARC were Curtis Aljets, Chuck Thorkildson, Carol Whisnant, Chad Stambaugh, and Scott Johnson. Steve Beseke and Dan Johnson were absent. Also present was Assistant City Administrator Miller. The three airport relations commissions from each community introduced themselves, spoke to their 2012 -2013 work plans /goals, and discussed ways in which the three bodies could work collaboratively in the future. ADJOURNMENT The meeting adjourned at 9 p.m. Date Secretary S 5 /1/2012 ® 5/31/201 Eagan-Mendota Heights Departure Corridor Analysis Minneapolis -St. Paul International Airport coffi s t z z � This report is for informational purposes only and cannot be used for enforcement purposes Metropolitan Airports Commission 3196 Carrier Jets Departed Runways 12L and 12R in May 2012 2935 (93.4 %) of those operations remained in the Corridor Minneapolis -St. Paul Penetration Gate Plot for In Corridor Gate 5/1/2012 00:00:00 - 5/31/2012 23:59:59 2985 Tracks Crossed Gate: Left = 1664 (55.7 %), Right = 1321 (44.3 %) v4 Monthly Eagan- Mendota Heights Departure Corridor Analysis. Report Generated: 06/07/2012 15:29 Pagel a 3196 Total 12L & 12R Carrier Departure Operations 2985 (93.4 %) Total 12L & 12R Carrier Departure Operations in the Corridor Metropolitan Airports Commission 101 (3.2 %) Runway 12L and 12R Carrier Jet Departure Operations were north of the 090° Corridor Boundary during May 2012. Of those, 3 ( ) returned to corridor before reaching SE border of Ft. Snelling State Park 1 c E « R St 1, aul Pant `e rGr ve Heightpe' rr GreyCroud IslanaTwP Minneapolis -St. Paul Penetration Gate Plot for North Corridor Gate 5/1/2012 00:00:00 - 5/31/2012 23:59:59 101 Tracks Crossed Gate: Left = 11 (10.9 %), Right = 90 (89.1% i� OD Page 2 Monthly Eagan- Mendota Heights Departure Corridor Analysis. Report Generated: 06/07/2012 15:29 9 Metropolitan Airports Commission 110 (3.4 %) Runway 12L and 12R Carrier Jet Departure Operations were south of the Corridor (south of 30L Localizer) during May 2012. Of those, 4 ( ) returned to Corridor before reaching SE border of Ft. Snelling State Park Minneapolis -St. Paul Penetration Gate Plot for South Corridor Gate 5/1/2012 00:00:00 - 5/31/2012 23:59:59 110 Tracks Crossed Gate: Left = 72 (65.5 %). Right = 38 (34.5% F. h Monthly Eagan- Mendota Heights Departure Corridor Analysis. Report Generated: 06/07/2012 15:29 Page 3 D Metropolitan Airports Commission 19 (0.6 %) Runway 12L and 12R Carrier Jet Departure Operations were 5 south of the Corridor (5 south of 30L Localizer) during May 2012 Minneapolis -St. Paul Penetration Gate Plot for 5° South Corridor Gate 5/1/2012 00:00:00 - 5/31/2012 23:59:59 19 Tracks Crossed Gate: Left = 15 (78.9 %), Riaht = 4 (21.1 % Page 4 Monthly Eagan- Mendota Heights Departure Corridor Analysis. Report Generated: 06/07/2012 15:29 h r Page 4 Monthly Eagan- Mendota Heights Departure Corridor Analysis. Report Generated: 06/07/2012 15:29 h Metropolitan Airports Commission Top 15 Runway 12L/12R Departure Destinations for May 2012 Airport City Heading g #Ops Total Ops ORD CHICAGO (O'HARE) 124° 121 3.8% SEA SEATTLE 278 97 3% CYYZ TORONTO 95 82 2.6% MOT MINOT 304 81 2.5% CYWG WINNIPEG 330 80 2.5% BIS BISMARCK 291 78 2.4% DEN DENVER 237 77 2.4 % FAR FARGO 312 75 2.3% ATL ATLANTA 149 68 2.1 GFK GRAND FORKS 316 64 2% DTW DETROIT 105 61 1.9 % BOS BOSTON 97 59 1.8% DLH DULUTH 19 59 1.8% SLC SALT LAKE CITY 252 53 1.7% SFO SAN FRANCISCO 251 52 1.6% Monthly Eagan- Mendota Heights Departure Corridor Analysis. Report Generated: 06/07/2012 15:29 Page 5 1Q� 1 Table of Contents for May 2012 Complaint Sunmlary 1 Noise Complaint Map 2 FAA Available Time for Runway Usage 3 MSP All Operations Runway Usage MSP Carrier Jet Operations Runway Usage MSP Carrier Jet Fleet Composition MSP All Operations Nighttime Runway Usage MSP Carrier Jet Operations Nighttime Runway Usage MSP Scheduled Nighttime Operators MSP Top 15 Nighttime Operators by Type MSP Top 15 Nighttime Operators Stage Mix Airport Noise and Operations Monitoring System Flight Tracks MSP ANOMS Remote Monitoring Tower Site Locations Map - Time Above dB Threshold for Carrier Jet Arrival Related Noise Events Time Above dB Threshold for Carrier Jet Departure Related Noise Events Carrier Jet Arrival Related Noise Events Carrier Jet Departure Related Noise Events MSP Top Ten Aircraft Noise Events per RMT Analysis of Daily and Monthly Aircraft Noise Events DNL A Product of the MAC Noise Program Office 4 5 6 7 8 9 -11 12 13 14 -17 18 19 20 21 22 23 -35 36 -38 MSP Complaints by City May 2012 City Arrival Departure Other Number of Complaints Number of Complainants % of Total Complaints' EAGAN 0 9 4 929 15 400 1357 24 38% MINNEAPOLIS 9 13 5 607 115 .582 1331 107 37.3% MENDOTA HEIGHT'S 0 0 1 .501 24 46 572 17 16% SAINT LOUIS PARK 0 54 0 0 0 8 62 3 1.7% SAINT PAUL 0 52 0 3 0 5 60 6 1.7 %n APPLE VALLEY 0 38 0 1 4 1 44 b 1.2% RICHFIELD 0 0 1 24 14 2 41 6 1.1 %n EDINA 1 0 I 13 0 18 33 5 0.9% BURNSVILLE 0 0 0 16 2 0 18 3 0.5% INVER GROVE HEIGHTS 0 0 1 0 14 1 15 1 0.4% BLOOMINGTON 0 0 0 1 A O 9 14 7 0.4% SAVAGE 0 0 0 6 1 7 1 0.2 % GOLDEN VALLEY 0 1 0 0 0 5 6 2 0.2% CHANHASSEN 0 3 0 0 0 0 3 1 0.1% LAKEVILLE 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 1 0.1% PLYMOUTH 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 1 0.1% EDEN PRAIRIE 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0% SPRING LAKE PARK 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0% WOODBURY 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 0% Total 180 27.27 1263 t 3570 194 Nature of MSP Complaints Complaint Total Early /Late 48 735 Engine Run -tip 0 12 Excessive Noise 170 3257 Frequency 135 2522 Ground Noise 3 10 Helicopter 0 2 Low Flying 46 2143 Structural Disturbance 3 743 Other 16 748 Total 9993 Time of Day Time Total 0000 -0559 17 80 0600 -0659 5 76 0700 -1159 67 922 1200 -1559 31 568 1600 -1959 43 746 2000 -2159 19 464 2200 -2259 20 464 2300 -2359 3 45 Total 3570 Complaints by Airport Airport Total MSP 3570 Airlake 0 Anoka 94 Crystal 0 Flying Cloud 119 Lake Elmo 0 St. Paul 6 Misc. 0 Total 3789 Note: Shaded Columns represent MSP complaints filed vin the Internet. Sum of %Totalof Complaints may not equal 100% due to rounding. *As of May 2005, the MSP Complaints by City report includes multiple complaint descriptors per individual complaint. Therefore, the number of complaint descriptors may be more than the number of reported complaints. Report Generated: 06/12/2012 13:56 4 5 - 1 - MSP International Airport Aviation Noise Complaints for May 2012 Number of Complaints per Address 1 -4 5 -15 16 -36 37 -59 60 -85 86 -237 238 -361 362 -525 -2- ' ( Report Generated: 06/12/2012 13:56 Available Hours for Runway Use May 2012 (Source: FAA Aviation Systems Performance Metrics Data) Nighttime Hours 10:30pm to 6:00am lis ;7 � r p ta ` R Y I i Eag n £ "` Report Generated: 06/12/2012 13:56 111 -3- All Operations Runway Use Report May 2012 RVVY :Arrival/ Departure Overflight Area Count Operations Percent Last Year ! Count Last Year Percent 04 Arr So. Richfield /Bloomington 3 0% 1 0% 12L Arr So. Minneapolis /No. Richfield 3248 18.4% 4530 25% 12R Arr So. Minneapolis /No. Richfield 3331 18.8% 4463 24.6% 17 Arr So. Minneapolis 34 0.2 %Q 0 0% 22 Arr St. Paul /Highland -Park 51 0.3% 8 0% 30L Arr Eagan /Mendota Heights 3453 19.5% 2996 16.5% 30R Arr Eagan /Mendota Heights 4219 23.9% 3731 20.6% 35 Arr Bloomington /Eagan 3347 18.9% 2419 13.3% Total Arrivals 17686 18148 RVVY Arrival/ Departure Overflight Area Count Operations' Percent Last Year Count Last Year Percent 04 Dep St. Paul /Highland Park 7 0% 22 0.1% 12L Dep Eagan /Mendota Heights 2267 12.8% 2907 16.1% 12R Dep Eagan /Mendota Heights 1307 7.4% 1505 8.3% 17 Dep Bloomington /Eagan 3953 22.4% 5292 29.2% 22 Dep So. Richfield /Bloomington 8 0% 20 0.1% 30L Dep So. Minneapolis /No. Richfield 5401 30.6% 4214 23.3% 30R Dep So. Minneapolis /No. Richfield 4733 26.8% 4144 22.9% 35 Dep So. Minneapolis 0 0% 0 0% Total 'Departures 17676 18104 Total Operations 35362 36252 Sum of RUS % may not equal 100% due to rounding. -4- I(D Report Generated: 06/12/2012 13:56 Carrier Jet Operations Runway Use Report May 2012 RWY Arrival/ Departure Overflight Area Count Operations Percent Last Year* Count Last Year Percent 04 Arr So. Richfield /Bloomington 0 0% 0 0% 12L Arr So. Minneapolis /No. Richfield 3021 18.8% 4083 25.4% 12R Arr So. Minneapolis /No. Richfield 2958 18.4% 3925 24.4% 17 Arr So. Minneapolis 30 0.2 %d 0 0% 22 Arr St. Paul /Highland Park 42 0.3% 5 0% 30L Arr Eagan /Mendota Heights 3013 18.8% 1 2588 16.1% 30R Arr Eagan /Mendota Heights 4004 25% 3429 21.3 35 Arr Bloomington /Eagan 2975 18.5% 2064 12.8% Total Arrivals 16043 16094 RWY Arrival/ Departure Overflight Area Count Operations Percent Last Year* Count Last Year Percent 04 Dep St. Paul /Highland Park 0 0% 19 0.1 %e 12L Dep Eagan /Mendota Heights 1990 12.4% 2467 15.3% 12R Dep Eagan /Mendota Heights 1206 7.5% 1366 8.5% 17 Dep Bloomington /Eagan 3658 22.8% 4889 30.3 %e 22 Dep So. Richfield /Bloomington 3 0% 11 0.1% 30L Dep So. Minneapolis /No. Richfield 4881 30.4% 3778 23.4% 30R Dep So. Minneapolis /No. Richfield 4292 26.8% 3631 22.5% 35 Dep I So. Minneapolis 0 0% 0 0% Total Departures 16030 16161 Total Operations 32073 32255 *NOTE: Due to flight tracking data enhancements, the air carrier operations counts for Last Year included in this report have been updated to reflect revisetl aircraft type counts. Please refer to the interactive reports at www.macnoise.com for detailed information regarding aircraft types. Sum of Rt1S % may not equal 100% due to rounding. Report Generated: 06/12/2012 13:56 \ O� -5- May 2012 MSP Carrier Jet Fleet Composition Type FAR Part 36 Take - Off Noise'Level° Aircraft Description Stage Count Percent DC10 101.8 McDonnell Douglas DC10 3 90 0.3% 672Q 97.6 Boeing 727 Modified Stage 3 3 4 0% B777 96.2 Boeing 777 3 64 0.2% B763 95.7 Boeing 767 -300 3 157 0.5% DC8Q 95.7 McDonnell Douglas DC8 Re- Manufactured 3 38 0.1% A330 95.6 Airbus Industries A330 3 196 0.6% MD11 92.8 McDonnell Douglas MD11 3 150 0.5% B762 92.1 Boeing 767 -200 3 12 0% A300 91.5 Airbus Industries A300 3 2 0% MD80 91.5 McDonnell Douglas MD80 3 1068 3.3% B757 91.4 Boeing 757 -200 3 2006 6.3% B764 91.2 Boeing 767 -400 3 62 0.2% A321 89.8 Airbus Industries A321 3 152 0.5% B734 88.9 Boeing 737 -400 3 12 0% B738 88.6 Boeing 737 -800 3 1268 4% B739 88.4 Boeing 737 -900 3 54 0.2% A320 87.8 Airbus Industries A320 3 2730 8.5% B735 877 Boeing 737 -500 3 157 0.5% B733 87.5 Boeing 737 -300 3 395 1.2% A319 87.4 Airbus Industries A319 3 2018 63% E190 86.9 Embraer 190 3 66 0.2% B7377 85.9 Boeing 737 -700 3 909 2.8% CRJ9 84.6 Canadair Regional Jet CRJ -900 3 2724 8.5% MD90 84.2 McDonnell Douglas MD90 3 2423 7.6% A318 84.1 Airbus Industries A318 3 8 0% B717 84.1 Boeing 717 3 516 1.6% E145 83.7 Embraer 145 3 1 567 1.8% E170 83.7 Embraer 170 3 1 4986 15.5% CRJ7 83.2 Canadair Regional Jet CRJ -700 3 789 2.5% CRJ1 79.8 Canadair Regional Jet CRJ -100 3 67 0.2% CRJ 79.8 Canadair Regional Jet CRJ 3 7 0% CRJ2 78.7 Canadair Regional Jet CRJ -200 3 8355 26% E135 77.9 Embraer 135 3 15 0% J328 76.5 Fairchild'Dornier 328 3 6 0% Totals 32073 Sum of fleet mix % may not equal 100% due to rounding. NOTE 1: Stage 3 represent aircraft modified to meet all Stage 3 criteria as outlined in Federal Aviation Regulation (FAR) Part 36. This includes hushkit engines, engine retrofits or aircraft operational flight configurations. -The Provided Noise levels from FAR Part 36 are the loudest levels documented for the representative aircraft type during take -off measured in EPNL dBA (Effective Perceived Noise Level). -EPNL is the level of the time integral of the antilogarithm of one -tenth of tone - corrected perceived noise level of an aircraft flyover measured in A- weighted decibels. NOTE 2: Due to flight tracking data enhancements, the air carrier operations counts for Last Year included in this report have been updated to reflect revised aircraft type counts. Please refer to the interactive reports at www.macnoise.com for detailed information regarding aircraft types. -6- 0 o Report Generated: 06/12/2012 13:56 Count Current' Percent 'Last Year Percentz Stage 2 0 0% 0% Stage 3 4 0% 3.1% Stage 3 Manufactured 32069 100% 96.9% Total Stage 3 32073 NOTE 1: Stage 3 represent aircraft modified to meet all Stage 3 criteria as outlined in Federal Aviation Regulation (FAR) Part 36. This includes hushkit engines, engine retrofits or aircraft operational flight configurations. -The Provided Noise levels from FAR Part 36 are the loudest levels documented for the representative aircraft type during take -off measured in EPNL dBA (Effective Perceived Noise Level). -EPNL is the level of the time integral of the antilogarithm of one -tenth of tone - corrected perceived noise level of an aircraft flyover measured in A- weighted decibels. NOTE 2: Due to flight tracking data enhancements, the air carrier operations counts for Last Year included in this report have been updated to reflect revised aircraft type counts. Please refer to the interactive reports at www.macnoise.com for detailed information regarding aircraft types. -6- 0 o Report Generated: 06/12/2012 13:56 Nighttime All Operations 10:30 p.m. to 6:00 a.m. Runway Use Report May 2012 RVVY Arrival/ Departure Overflight Area Count Operations Percent Last Year Count Last Year Percent 04 Arr So. Richfield /Bloomington 0 0% 0 0% 12L Arr So. Minneapolis /No. Richfield 130 12.5% 232 21.4% 12R Arr So. Minneapolis /No. Richfield 325 31.2% 276 25.5% 17 Arr So. Minneapolis 0 0% 0 0% 22 Arr St. Paul /Highland Park 0 0% 2 0.2 % 30L Arr Eagan /Mendota Heights 351 33.8% 225 20.8% 30R Arr Eagan /Mendota Heights 214 20.6% 337 31.1% 35 Arr Bloomington /Eagan 20 1.9% 11 1% Total Arrivals 1040 1083 RWY Arrival / Departure Overflight Area Count Operations ! Percent Last Year Count Last Year Percent 04 Dep St. Paul /Highland Park 0 0% 1 0.4% 12L Dep Eagan /Mendota Heights 71 21.7% 72 28.1% 12R Dep Eagan /Mendota Heights 88 26.9% 68 26.6% 17 Dep Bloomington /Eagan 43 13.1% 18 7% 22 Dep So. Richfield /Bloomington 0 0% 2 0.8% 30L Dep So. Minneapolis /No. Richfield 64 19.6% 38 14.8% 30R Dep So. Minneapolis /No. Richfield 61 18.7% 57 22.3% 35 Dep So. Minneapolis 0 0% 0 0% Total Departures 327 256 Total' Operations 1367 1339 Sum of RUS % may not equal 100% due to rounding. Report Generated: 06/12/2012 13:56 j ` - 7- Nighttime Carrier Jet Operations 10:30 p.m. to 6:00 a.m. Runway Use Report May 2012 RWY Arrival/ Departure Overflight Area Count Operations Percent Last Year* Count Last Year Percent 04 Arr So. Richfield /Bloomington 0 0% 0 0% 12L Arr So. Minneapolis /No. Richfield 125 13.1% 219 21.6 % 12R Arr So. Minneapolis /No. Richfield 296 30.9% 263 26% 17 Arr So. Minneapolis 0 0% 0 0% 22 Arr St. Paul /Highland Park 0 0% 2 0.2% 30L Arr Eagan /Mendota Heights 319 33.3% 214 21.1% 30R Arr Eagan /Mendota Heights 200 20.9% 307 30.3% 35 Arr Bloomington /Eagan 17 1.8% 8 0.8% Total Arrivals 957 1013 RWY Arrival/ Departure Overflight Area Count Operations Percent Last Year* Count Last Year Percent 04 Dep St. Paul /Highland Park 0 0% 1 0.4% 12L Dep Eagan /Mendota Heights 67 22.8% 64 28.3% 12R Dep Eagan /Mendota Heights 73 24.8% 57 25.2% 17 Dep Bloomington /Eagan 40 13.6% 15 6.6% 22 Dep So. Richfield /Bloomington 0 0% 1 0.4% 30L Dep So. Minneapolis /No. Richfield 54 18.4% 35 15.5% 30R Dep So. Minneapolis /No. Richfield 60 20.4% 53 23.5% 35 Dep So. Minneapolis 0 0% 0 0% Total 'Departures 294 226 Total Operations 1251 1239 *NOTE: Due to flight tracking data enhancements, the air carrier operations counts for Last Year included in this report have been updated to reflect revised aircraft type counts. Please refer to the interactive reports at www.macnoise.com for detailed information regarding aircraft types. Sum of RUS % may not equal 100% due to rounding. -8- 0Q Report Generated: 06/12/2012 13:56 June 2012 Nighttime Scheduled Carrier Jet Operations 10:30 p.m. to 6:00 a.m. 200 180 150 C 140 2 120 100 0 as 80 E ° 50 40 20 0 Time June 2012 Nighttime Scheduled Carrier Jet Operations 10:30 p.m. to 6:00 a.m. DAL O 'UAL E] usA SwA El six 0 TRS UPS FQ} El AAL El NI<S E3 FFT Airline Stage 2 Stage 3 Manufactured Stage 3 Total Delta (DAL) 0 0 340 340 United (UAL) 0 0 122 122 US Airways (USA) 0 0 98 98 Southwest (SWA) 0 0 92 92 Sun Country (SCX) 0 0 85 85 Airtran (TRS) 0 0 60 60 UPS (UPS) 0 0 57 57 Fed Ex (FDX) 0 0 41 41 American (AAL) 0 0 35 35 Spirit (NKS) 0 0 30 30 Frontier Airlines (FFT) 0 0 1 1 1 .Total 0 0 961 961 Report Generated: 06/12/2012 13:56 0 �) -9- O IiJ 4 If7 � IYJ C> IY] C} If] C^ If] G LL7 t> IC7 < LL7 t� Ln O Lc <3 I1? O U O U O LL) M '.]" IR Tl M tF O Ti M CF O Ii M tY d ai In St 4 L M 'd' O ci C7 7 O T1 M CY . . . . .. .. .. . . . . . . . N hl M M M " > {y O 6 rl s-i ri ri {V CJ t*J N M M M M b --I- -C> 'C' If LL7 I LO c.� > <> r.I c,I cv cv ry o 0 0 0 0� o c c> o 0 0 0 0� o 0 0 o r_. o I= c� o June 2012 Nighttime Scheduled Carrier Jet Operations Time A/D Carrier Flight Number Equipment Stage 3 Days of Operation Routing 22:30 A Delta 2034 MD90 M MTWThFSu ATL MSP 22:35 A Sun Country 284 B738 M Th SEA MSP 22:35 A Sun Country 284 B737 M MTWFSSu SEA MSP 22:35 A American 649 B738 M MTW MIA MSP 22:36 A Delta 1654 MD90 M MTWThFSu DTW MSP 22:47 A Airtran 220 B717 M MTWThFSSu ATL MSP 22:47 A Frontier Airlines 108 A320 M F DEN MSP 22:48 A Sun Country 254 B737 M Th BOS MSP 22:48 A Sun Country 254 B738 M MSu BOS MSP 22:52 A Sun Country 404 B737 M MThF SAN MSP 22:55 A American 1216 MD80 M ThFSSu DFW MSP 22:55 A Sun Country 426 B737 M TWS LAX MSP 22:55 A Sun Country 426 8738 M MThF LAX MSP 23:00 A Sun Country 246 8738 M ThSu JFK MSP 23:00 A Sun Country 246 B737 M MF JFK MSP 23:03 A Sun Country 106 B738 M MTWThFSu LAS MSP 23:05 A American 1284 MD80 M MTW DFW MSP 23:18 A United 3517 E170 M MTWThF DEN MSP 23:21 A Delta 1832 8757 M MTWThFSu SFO MSP 23:21 A United 5124 E170 M MTWThF EWR MSP 23:25 A Sun Country 396 8738 M F SFO MSP 23:25 A Sun Country 396 8737 M MTWS SFO MSP 23:28 A United 3517 E170 M Su DEN MSP 23:29 A United 5130 E170 M Su YUL EWR MSP 23:30 A American 609 MD80 M ThFSSu MCO ORD MSP 23:40 A Southwest 840 B737 M MTWThFSu MCO DEN MSP 23:41 A Delta 1568 B757 M MTWThFSu LAX MSP 23:48 A Delta 300 MD90 M S ATL MSP 23:49 A Delta 300 MD90 M MTWThFSu ATL MSP 23:50 A Southwest 779 B737 M MTWThFSu PHX MSP 23:50 A US Airways 936 A321 M MTWThFSSu SAN PHX MSP 23:50 A American 3760 CRJ M MTW ORD MSP 23:55 A Sun Country 396 B738 M Th SFO MSP 23:57 A US Airways 984 A320 M S CLT MSP 23:57 A US Airways 984 A321 M MTWThFSu CLT MSP 23:59 A United 710 A320 M TWThF ORD MSP 00:05 A Delta 2320 MD90 M MTWThFS SEA MSP 00:07 A United 1659 8739 M M ORD MSP 00:13 A United 710 A320 M T ORD MSP 00:45 A Delta 1682 A320 M F LAS MSP 01:00 A United 1808 B738 M F MKC MSP 04:15 A UPS 0556 B757 M TWThF 04:24 A UPS 0558 B757 M TWThF 04:49 A UPS 1452 B757 M F 04:53 A US Airways 58 A321 M F PHX MSP 04:54 A US Airways 58 A321 M MThFSSu SAN PHX MSP 05:05 A Sun Country 430 B738 M M LAX MSP 05:08 A FedEx 1718 MD11 M MTFSSu 05:08 A Sun Country 476 8737 M MS ANC MSP 05:13 A UPS 0560 MD11 M TWThF -10- a � Report Generated: 06/12/2012 13:56 June 2012 Nighttime Scheduled Carrier Jet Operations Time A/D Carrier Flight Number Equipment Stage 3 Days of Operation Routing 05:15 D US Airways 1965 A320 M Su MSP CLT PUJ 05:15 D US Airways 1588 A319 M S MSP CLT PVD 05:15 D US Airways 1793 A319 M MTWThF MSP CLT MEM 05:17 D United 1606 B738 M F MSP IAH 05:20 D United 279 A320 M MTWThFSSu MSP IAH 05:23 A Delta 1832 B738 M F SMF MSP 05:25 D Delta 2130 8757 M MTWThFSSu MSP ATL 05:30 A FedEx 1407 MD11 M MTWFSSu 05:30 D Southwest 3231 B737 M MTWThF MSP MDW PIT 05:35 A Spirit 612 A319 M MTWThFSSu LAS MSP ORD 05:40 D Airtran 643 B717 M MTWThFSSu MSP MIKE 05:42 A Delta 1014 B763 M MTWThFSSu SEA MSP 05:43 A Delta 1787 B757 M MTWThFSSu MSP FAI MSP 05:44 A Delta 806 B757 M Su SFO MSP 05:44 A Delta 746 B757 M MTWThFSSu LAX MSP 05:45 A Delta 2181 B738 M MTWThFSSu SMF MSP 05:45 A Great Lakes 7282 B190 P MTWThF MCW MSP 05:46 D United 5148 E170 M S MSP EWR RDU 05:48 A UPS 0496 B757 M S 05:50 D United 3563 E170 M MTWThF MSP EWR 05:51 A Delta 1730 B757 M MTWThFSSu ANC MSP 05:53 A Delta 896 8757 M S LAS MSP 05:54 A Delta 896 B757 M MThFSu LAS MSP 05:55 D United 520 A320 M TWThF MSP ORD LAX 05:55 D United 520 A319 M M MSP ORD LAX 05:55 D Southwest 3498 B737 M MTWThF MSP STL HOU 05:55 D United 3487 E170 M S MSP ORD 05:55 D United 3443 E170 M Su MSP ORD LGA Report Generated: 06/12/2012 13:56 a 11 - May 2012 Top 15 Actual Nighttime Jet Operators by Type 10:30 p.m. to 6:00 a.m. Total Nighttime Jet Operations by Hour Flour Count 2230 309 2300 419 2400 112 100 31 200 16 300 15 400 72 500 277 TOTAL 1251 Airline ID Stage Type Count Airtran TRS 3 B7377 2 Airtran TRS 3 B717 54 America West AWE 3 E190 1 America West AWE 3 A320 21 America West AWE 3 A319 35 America West AWE 3 A321 45 American AAL 3 B738 16 American AAL 3 MD80 32 American Eagle EGF 3 CRJ7 24 Atlantic Southeast ASQ 3 CRJ9 2 Atlantic Southeast ASQ 3 E145 29 Compass CPZ 3 E170 56 Delta DAL 3 B764 2 Delta DAL 3 A330 3 Delta DAL 3 B763 15 Delta DAL 3 MD80 15 Delta DAL 3 A319 19 Delta DAL 3 MD90 48 Delta DAL 3 A320 59 Delta DAL 3 B738 89 Delta DAL 3 B757 116 FedEx FDX 3 B72Q 2 FedEx FDX 3 MD11 17 FedEx FDX 3 DC10 21 Pinnacle FLG 3 CRJ9 22 Pinnacle FLG 3 CRJ2 25 Shuttle America TCF 3 E170 30 Skywest Airlines SKW 3 CRJ2 19 Southwest SWA 3 8733 6 Southwest SWA 3 B7377 63 Sun Country SCX 3 B7377 77 Sun Country SCX 3 B738 130 UPS UPS 3 A300 2 UPS UPS 3 MD11 21 UPS UPS 3 B757 44 United UAL 3 B7377 3 United UAL 3 B739 4 United UAL 3 A319 8 United UAL 3 A320 15 United UAL 3 B735 31 TOTAL 1 1223 Note: The top 15 nighttime operators represent 97.8% of the total nighttime carrier jet operations. -12- c o Report Generated: 06/12/2012 13:56 May 2012 Nighttime Carrier Jet Operations Mix for Top 15 Airlines 10:30 p.m. to 6:00 a.m. 180 160 140 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 Time May 2012 Nighttime Carrier Jet Fleet Stage Mix for Top 15 Airlines 10:30 D.M. to 6:00 a.m. D DAL El SCx ❑ AtdE O SWFA UPS is (J 'UAL TRS CP2 AAL FLG 'FAY, Ej ow TCF 0 EGF El sm .* Airline Stage 2 Stage 3 Manufactured Stage 3 Total Delta (DAL) 0 0 366 366 Sun Country (SCX) 0 0 207 207 America West (AWE) 0 0 102 102 Southwest (SWA) 0 0 69 69 UPS (UPS) 0 0 67 67 United (UAL) 0 0 61 61 Airtran (TRS) 0 0 56 56 Compass (CPZ) 0 0 56 56 American (AAL) 0 0 48 48 Pinnacle (FLG) 0 0 47 47 Fed Ex (FDX) 0 2 38 40 Atlantic Southeast (ASQ) 0 0 31 31 Shuttle America (TCF) 0 0 30 30 American Eagle (EGF) 0 0 24 24 Skywest Airlines (SKW) 0 1 0 1 19 19 Other 0 0 28 28 Total 0 2 1249 1251 Report Generated: 06/12/2012 13:56 a 9 -13- M tit O T! Q� O c�-I C7 V O T! M V IR ��-i In V O T! M 'd <=, T � 1=1 � O . U-) M .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. . .. .. .. . .. .. ""M M az7 m O O O —1 —1 C— ti--I N N N N -- M CZ) <1 V' > ct I <> In IC N N N N N N O C? G C+ C? C+ C- C+ O O 0 0 i O C? G Q 4 +3 0 0 O 0 0 Airport Noise and Operations Monitoring System Flight Tracks Carrier Jet Operations - May 2012 May 1 thru 8, 2012 - 4176 Carrier Jet Departures May 1 thru 8, 2012 - 229 Nighttime Carrier Jet Arrivals May 1 thru 8, 2012 - 78 Nighttime Carrier Jet Departures -14- a?) Report Generated: 06/12/2012 13:56 May 1 thru 8, 2012 - 4189 Carrier Jet Arrivals Airport Noise and Operations Monitoring System Flight Tracks Carrier Jet Operations o May 2012 May 9 thru 16, 2012 - 4165 Carrier Jet Departures May 9 thru 16, 2012 - 239 Nighttime Carrier Jet Arrivals May 9 thru 16, 2012 55 Nighttime Carrier Jet Departures Report Generated: 06/12/2012 13:56 CA % -15- May 9 thru 16, 2012 - 4168 Carrier Jet Arrivals Airport Noise and Operations Monitoring System Flight Tracks Carrier Jet Operations - May 2012 May 17 thru 24, 2012 - 286 Nighttime Carrier Jet Arrivals May 17 thru 24, 2012 - 111 Nighttime Carrier Jet Departures -16- � Report Generated: 06/12/2012 13:56 May 17 thru 24, 2012 - 4229 Carrier Jet Arrivals May 17 thru 24, 2012 - 4238 Carrier Jet Departures Airport Noise and Operations Monitoring System Flight Tracks Carrier Jet Operations - May 2012 May 25 thru 31, 2012 - 203 Nighttime Carrier Jet Arrivals May 25 thru 31, 2012 - 50 Nighttime Carrier Jet Departures Report Generated: 06/12/2012 13:56 ` -17- May 25 thru 31, 2012 - 3451 Carrier Jet Departures May 25 thru 31, 2012 - 3457 Carrier Jet Arrivals MSP International Airport Remote Monitoring Tower (RMT) Site Locations Remote Monitoring Tower - 18 - jQ Report Generated: 06/12/2012 13:56 Time Above dB Threshold for Arrival Related Noise Events May 2012 RMT ID City Address Time >= 65dB Time >= 80dB Time >= 90dB Time >= 1OOdB 1 Minneapolis Xerxes Ave. & 41st St. 14:04:17 00:00:40 00:00:06 00:00:00 2 Minneapolis Fremont Ave. & 43rd St. 15:00:30 00:03:43 00:00:15 00:00:07 3 Minneapolis West Elmwood St. & Belmont Ave. 16:40:00 00:26:11 00:00:01 00:00:00 4 Minneapolis Park Ave. & 48th St. 15:01:02 00:05:06 00:00:18 00:00:04 5 Minneapolis 12th Ave. & 58th St. 16:04:42 03:04:34 00:00:45 00:00:00 6 Minneapolis 25th Ave. & 57th St.. 14:53:41 02:17:33 00:00:45 00:00:08 7 Richfield Wentworth Ave. & 64th St. 00:32:47 00:00:19 00:00:00 00:00:00 8 Minneapolis Longfellow Ave. & 43rd St. 00:11:03 00:00:14 00:00:00 00:00:00 9 St. Paul Saratoga St. & Hartford Ave. 00:15:05 00:01:09 00:00:00 00:00:00 10 St. Paul Itasca Ave. & Bowdoin St. 00:16:09 00:02:53 00:00:01 00:00:00 11 St. Paul Finn St. & Scheffer Ave. 00:01:18 00:00 :00 00:00:00 00:00:00 12 St. Paul Alton St. & Rockwood Ave. 00:01 :20 00:00:03 00:00:00 00:00:00 13 Mendota Heights Southeast end of Mohican Court 00:08:36 00:00:00 00:00:00 00:00:00 14 Eagan 1st St. & McKee St. 20:01:52 00:01:00 00:00:00 00:00:00 15 Mendota Heights Cullon St. & Lexington Ave. 00:39:20 00:00:05 00:00:00 00:00:00 16 Eagan Avalon Ave. & Vilas Ln. 15:54:38 00:27:15 00:00:08 00:00:00 17 Bloomington 84th St. & 4th Ave. 00:01:16 00:00:00 00:00:00 00:00:00 18 Richfield 75th St. & 17th Ave. 01:08:18 1 00:00:04 00:00:00 00:00:00 19 Bloomington I 16th Ave. & 84th St. 00:29:55 00:00 :00 00:00:00 00:00:00 20 Richfield 75th St. & 3rd Ave. 00:00:28 00:00:00 00:00:00 00 :00:00 21 Inver Grove Heights Barbara Ave. & 67th St. 00:14:07 00:00 :00 00:00:00 00:00:00 22 Inver Grove Heights Anne Marie Trail 07:11:11 00:00:05 00:00:00 00:00:00 23 Mendota Heights End of Kenndon Ave. 02:03:33 00:01:21 00:00:00 00:00:00 24 Eagan Chapel Ln. & Wren Ln. 20:45:12 00:00:47 00:00:00 00:00:00 25 Eagan Moonshine Park 1321 Jurdy Rd. 00:44:38 00:00 :00 00:00:00 00:00:00 26 Inver Grove Heights 6796 Arkansas Ave. W, 01:38:44 00:00:17 00:00:00 00:00:00 27 Minneapolis Anthony School 5757 Irving Ave. S. 00:20:50 00:00:03 00:00:00 00:00:00 28 Richfield 6645 16th Ave. S. 01:45:34 00:00:22 00:00:00 1 00:00:00 29 Minneapolis Ericsson Elem. School 4315 31st Ave. S. 00:02:17 00:00:00 00:00:00 00 :00:00 30 Bloomington 8715 River Ridge Rd. 03:57:33 00:00:29 00 :00:00 00:00:00 31 Bloomington 9501 12th Ave. S. 00:01:43 1 00:00:00 00:00:00 00:00:00 32 Bloomington 10325 Pleasant Ave. S. 00:01:23 00:00:05 00:00:00 00:00:00 33 Burnsville North River Hills Park 00:02:17 00:00:00 00:00:00 00:00 :00 34 Burnsville Red Oak Park 00:19:08 00:00:00 00:00 :00 00:00:00 35 Eagan 2100 Garnet Ln. 09:24:35 00:00:30 00 :00:00 00 :00:00 36 Apple Valley Briar Oaks & Scout Pond 14:28 :55 00:00:57 00 :00:00 00:00:00 37 Eagan 4399 Woodgate Ln. N. 00:04:40 00:00 :00 00:00:00 00:00:00 38 Eagan 3957 Turquoise Cir. 00:00:17 00:00:00 00:00:00 00:00:00 39 Eagan 3477 St. Charles PI. 00:00:43 00:00:02 00:00:00 00:00:00 Total Time for Arrival !Noise Events 1 194:33:37 : 1 06 :35:47 00:02:19 '00:00:19 *Note: These time values and levels are based upon 1- second leq levels. Report Generated: 06/12/2012 13:56 � E j _19- Time Above Threshold dB for Departure Related Noise Events May 2012 RMT ID City Address Time >= 65dB Time >= 80dB Time >= 90dI3 Time >= 1OOdB 1 Minneapolis Xerxes Ave. & 41st St. 03:16:55 00:00:13 00:00:00 00:00:00 2 Minneapolis Fremont Ave. & 43rd St. 04:18:56 00:01:17 00:00:00 00:00:00 3 Minneapolis West Elmwood St. & Belmont Ave. 08:20:39 00:04:45 00:00:00 00:00:00 4 Minneapolis Park Ave. & 48th St. 12:00:53 00:11:15 00:00:03 00:00:00 5 Minneapolis 12th Ave. & 58th St. 36:13:28 02:03:13 00:02:14 00:00:00 6 Minneapolis 25th Ave. & 57th St. 38:06:47 05:06:34 00:19:49 00:00 :00 7 Richfield Wentworth Ave. & 64th St. 23:09:24 00:20:29 00:00:08 00:00:00 8 Minneapolis Longfellow Ave. & 43rd St. 14:59:40 00:27:17 00:00:15 00:00:00 9 St. Paul Saratoga St. & Hartford Ave. 00:07:54 00:00:14 00:00:00 00:00:00 10 St. Paul Itasca Ave. & Bowdoin St. 00:05:06 1 00:00:16 00:00:00 00:00:00 11 St. Paul Finn St. & Scheffer Ave. 00:06:18 00 :00:14 00:00:00 00:00:00 12 St. Paul Alton St. & Rockwood Ave. 00:10:43 00:00:01 00:00:00 00:00:00 13 Mendota Heights Southeast end of Mohican Court 06:18:54 00 :01:56 00:00:00 00:00:00 14 Eagan 1 st St. & McKee St. 07:28:14 00:04:43 00:00:00 00:00:00 15 Mendota Heights Cullon St. & Lexington Ave. 09:16:04 00:05:59 00:00:05 00:00:00 16 Eagan Avalon Ave. & Vilas Ln. 07:07:43 00:17:21 00:00:02 00:00:00 17 Bloomington 84th St. & 4th Ave. 00:12:48 00:00:01 00:00:00 00:00:00 18 Richfield 75th St. & 17th Ave. 09:32:54 00:00:52 00:00 :00 00:00:00 19 Bloomington 16th Ave. & 84th St. 03 :45:08 00:00:25 00:00:00 00:00:00 20 Richfield 75th St. & 3rd Ave. 00:34:45 00:00 :01 00:00:00 00:00:00 21 Inver Grove Heights Barbara Ave. & 67th St. 01:55:43 00:00:22 00:00:00 00:00:00 22 Inver Grove Heights Anne Marie Trail 00:43:01 00:00:00 00:00:00 00:00:00 23 Mendota Heights End of Kenndon Ave. 14:49:10 00:27:48 00:00:22 00:00:00 24 Eagan Chapel Ln. & Wren Ln. 04:54:38 00:01:33 00:00:00 00:00:00 25 Eagan Moonshine Park 1321 Jurdy Rd. 07:45:11 00:00:09 00:00:00 00:00:00 26 Inver Grove Heights 6796 Arkansas Ave. W. 03:35:03 00:00:31 00:00:00 00:00:00 27 Minneapolis Anthony School 5757 Irving Ave. S. 15 :00:05 00:08:44 00:00:00 00:00:00 28 Richfield 6645 16th Ave. S. 15:33:29 00:02:45 00:00:00 00:00:00 29 Minneapolis Ericsson Elem. School 4315 31st Ave. S. 07:07:25 00:03:26 00:00:00 00:00:00 30 Bloomington 8715 River Ridge Rd. 15:41:38 00:15:26 00:00:06 00:00:00 31 Bloomington 9501 12th Ave. S. 01:29:29 00:00 :03 00:00:00 00:00:00 32 Bloomington 10325 Pleasant Ave. S. 00:29:52 00:00:00 00:00 :00 00:00:00 33 Burnsville North River Hills Park 01:45:20 00:00:47 00:00:00 00:00:00 34 Burnsville Red Oak Park 00:39:26 00:00:00 00:00 :00 00:00:00 35 Eagan 2100 Garnet Ln. 02:50:04 00:01:06 00:00:00 00:00:00 36 Apple Valley Briar Oaks & Scout Pond 01:01:54 00:00:07 00:00:00 00:00:00 37 Eagan 4399 Woodgate Ln. N. 01:47:26 00:00:32 00:00:00 00:00:00 38 Eagan 3957 Turquoise Cir. 02:55:22 00:01:46 00:00:00 00:00:00 39 Eagan 3477 St. Charles PI. 04:54:56 00:04:52 00 :00:00 00:00:00 Total Time for Departure Noise :Events 290:12:25 09:57:03 00:23:04 00:00 :00 "Note: These time values and levels are based upon 1- second leq levels. -20- 3N Report Generated: 06/12/2012 13:56 Arrival Related Noise Events May 2012 RMT ID City Address Arrival Events >_ 65dB Arrival Events >_ 80dB Arrival Events >= 90dI3 Arrival Events >_ 100d13 1 Minneapolis Xerxes Ave. & 41st St. 3569 5 1 0 2 Minneapolis Fremont Ave. & 43rd St. 3169 73 1 1 3 Minneapolis West Elmwood St. & Belmont Ave. 3380 420 1 0 4 Minneapolis Park Ave. & 48th St. 3266 85 3 1 5 Minneapolis 12th Ave. & 58th St. 3460 2487 25 0 6 Minneapolis 25th Ave. & 57th St. 3378 2587 19 2 7 Richfield Wentworth Ave. &'64th St. 110 5 0 0 8 Minneapolis Longfellow Ave. & 43rd St. 41 2 0 0 9 St. Paul Saratoga St. & Hartford Ave. 50 15 0 0 10 St. Paul Itasca Ave. & Bowdoin St. 58 41 1 0 11 St. Paul Finn St. & Scheffer Ave. 6 0 0 0 12 St. Paul Alton St. & Rockwood Ave. 5 2 0 0 13 Mendota Heights Southeast end of Mohican Court 40 0 0 0 14 Eagan 1st St. & McKee St. 4873 18 0 0 15 Mendota Heights Cullon St. & Lexington Ave. 105 2 0 0 16 Eagan Avalon Ave. & Vilas Ln. 3322 428 3 0 17 Bloomington 84th St. & 4th Ave. 7 0 0 0 18 Richfield 75th St. & 17th Ave. 305 2 0 0 19 Bloomington 16th Ave. & 84th St. 82 0 0 0 20 Richfield 75th St. & 3rd Ave. 2 0 0 0 21 Inver Grove Heights Barbara Ave. & 67th St. 56 0 0 0 22 Inver Grove Heights Anne Marie Trail 1811 3 0 0 23 Mendota Heights End of Kenndon Ave. 426 14 0 0 24 Eagan Chapel Ln. & Wren Ln. 4906 18 0 0 25 Eagan Moonshine Park 1321 Jurdy Rd. 179 0 0 0 26 Inver Grove Heights 6796 Arkansas Ave. W. 389 3 0 0 27 Minneapolis Anthony School 5757 Irving Ave. S. 65 2 0 0 28 Richfield 6645 16th Ave. S. 452 8 0 0 29 Minneapolis Ericsson Elem. School 4315 31st Ave. S. 8 0 0 0 30 Bloomington 8715 River Ridge Rd. 1127 6 0 0 31 Bloomington 9501 12th Ave. S. 9 0 0 0 32 Bloomington 10325 Pleasant Ave. S. 6 1 0 0 33 Burnsville North River Hills Park 12 0 0 0 34 Burnsville Red Oak Park 71 0 0 0 35 Eagan 2100 Garnet Ln. 2407 8 0 0 36 Apple Valley Briar Oaks & Scout Pond 2883 16 0 0 37 Eagan 4399 Woodgate Ln. N. 14 0 0 0 38 Eagan 3957 Turquoise Cir. 1 0 0 0 39 Eagan 3477 St. Charles PI. 2 1 0 0 Total Arrival Noise Events 44052 6252 54 4 *Note: These counts are based upon Lmax. Report Generated: 06/12/2012 13:56 -21 - Departure Related Noise Events May 2012 RMT ID City Address Departure Events >= 65dB Departure Events >= 80dB Departure Events >= 90dB Departure Events >_ 1'OOdB 1 Minneapolis Xerxes Ave. & 41 st St. 690 5 0 0 2 Minneapolis Fremont Ave. & 43rd St. 911 17 0 0 3 Minneapolis West Elmwood St. & Belmont Ave. 1705 67 0 0 4 Minneapolis Park Ave. & 48th St. 2332 148 1 0 5 Minneapolis 12th Ave. & 58th St. 5999 1329 45 0 6 Minneapolis 25th Ave. & 57th St. 6903 2581 213 0 7 Richfield Wentworth Ave. & 64th St. 3909 232 3 0 8 Minneapolis Longfellow Ave. & 43rd St. 2668 209 10 0 9 St. Paul Saratoga St. & Hartford Ave. 23 2 0 0 10 St. Paul Itasca Ave. & Bowdoin St. 14 2 0 0 11 St. Paul Finn St. & Scheffer Ave. 16 3 0 0 12 St. Paul Alton St. & Rockwood Ave. 31 1 0 0 13 Mendota Heights Southeast end of Mohican Court 1320 23 0 0 14 Eagan 1st St. & McKee St. 1342 57 0 0 15 Mendota Heights Cullon St. & Lexington Ave. 1722 81 2 0 16 Eagan Avalon Ave. & Vilas Ln. 1204 192 2 0 17 Bloomington 84th St. & 4th Ave. 43 1 0 0 18 Richfield 75th St. & 17th Ave. 2210 29 0 0 19 Bloomington 16th Ave. & 84th St. 929 11 0 0 20 Richfield 75th St. & 3rd Ave. 124 1 0 0 21 Inver Grove Heights Barbara Ave. & 67th St, 481 7 0 0 22 Inver Grove Heights Anne Marie Trail 173 0 0 0 23 Mendota Heights End of Kenndon Ave. 2470 320 7 0 24 Eagan Chapel Ln. & Wren Ln. 966 27 0 0 25 Eagan Moonshine Park 1321 Jurdy Rd. 933 2 0 0 26 Inver Grove Heights 6796 Arkansas Ave. W. 808 10 0 0 27 Minneapolis Anthony School 5757 Irving Ave. S. 2921 134 0 0 28 Richfield 6645 16th Ave. S. 3382 66 0 0 29 Minneapolis Ericsson Elem. School 4315 31 st Ave. S. 1284 52 0 0 30 Bloomington 8715 River Ridge Rd. 2720 161 3 0 31 Bloomington 9501 12th Ave. S. 331 2 0 0 32 Bloomington 10325 Pleasant Ave. S. 123 0 0 0 33 Burnsville North River Hills Park 391 4 0 0 34 Burnsville Red Oak Park 158 0 0 0 35 Eagan 2100 Garnet Ln. 566 13 0 0 36 Apple Valley Briar Oaks & Scout Pond 229 2 0 0 37 Eagan 4399 Woodgate Ln. N. 392 8 0 0 38 Eagan 3957 Turquoise Cir. 618 20 0 0 39 Eagan 3477 St. Charles Pl. 991 1 52 1 0 0 Total Departure Noise Events 54032 1 5871 1 286 1 0 *Note: These counts are based upon Lmax. -22- 3( Report Generated: 06/12/2012 13:56 Top Ten Loudest Aircraft Noise Events for MSP May 2012 (RMT Site #1) Xerxes Ave. & 41st St., Minneapolis Date /Time Flight Number Aircraft Type Arrival/ Departure Runway Lmax(dB) 05/01/201214:35 Unknown UKN A 12L 93 05/20/201214:38 DAL1923 MD80 D 30R 82.7 05/01/201219:57 AAL1344 MD80 A 12R 81.6 05/23/2012 5:17 FDX1407 DC10 A 12R 81.6 05/06/201214:32 DAL2029 MD80 D 30R 81.4 05/25/201215:12 DAL621 B777 D 30L 80.8 05/29/2012 22:40 DAL1713 MD80 D 30L 80.6 05/27/201212:17 DAL622 B777 A 12R 80.2 05/07/2012 22:14 DAL1713 MD80 D 30R 80.2 05/26/201218:27 DAL1528 MD80 A 12R 80 (RMT Site #2) Fremont Ave. & 43rd St., Minneapolis Date /Time Flight Number Aircraft Type Arrival/ Departure Runway Lmax(dB) 05/01/201214:35 Unknown UKN A 12L 101.2 05/20/201214:37 DAL1923 MD80 D 30R 86.9 05/06/201214:32 DAL2029 MD80 D 30R 85.7 05/18/2012 20:15 DAL349 MD80 A 12L 84.7 05/19/201217:07 AAL331 MD80 A 12L 84.7 05/05/201216:50 VNR183 P180 A 12L 84.5 05/20/2012 22:15 DAL1713 MD80 D 30R 84.3 05/17/201216:26 DAL1763 MD80 A 12L 84.2 05/04/2012 20:29 DAL349 MD80 A 12L 84.1 05/31/201215:19 DAL621 B777 D 30L 83.7 (RMT Site #3) West Elmwood St. & Belmont Ave., Minneapolis Date /Time Flight Number Aircraft Type Arrival/ Departure Runway Lmax(dB) 05/10/201216:36 DAL1968 B757 A 12R 91 05/04/2012 5:03 FDX1718 MD11 A 12R 88.9 05/19/201212:14 AAL450 MD80 A 12R 88 05/04/2012 9:43 AAL1038 MD80 A 12R 87.6 05/17/201212:19 AAL450 MD80 A 12R 87.5 05/22/2012 8:48 DAL340 MD80 A 12R 87.5 05/22/2012 7:08 DHL592 DC8Q A 12R 87.4 05/01/201212:35 DAL622 B777 A 12R 87.3 05/23/201215:12 DAL41 B764 A 12R 87.2 05/18/2012 5:07 UPS560 MD11 A 12R 87 Report Generated: 06/12/2012 13:56 3 l - 23- Top Ten Loudest Aircraft Noise Events for MSP May 2012 (RMT Site #4) Park Ave. & 48th St., Minneapolis Date /Time Flight Number Aircraft Type Arrival/ Departure Runway Lmax(dB) 05/01/201214:36 Unknown UKN A 12L 102 05/19/201216:21 DAL744 B757 A 12L 95.1 05/23/201216:15 DAL931 MD80 A 12L 90.9 05/31/201210:24 DAL818 MD80 D 30R 90.9 05/20/2012 22:15 DAL1713 MD80 D 30R 89.4 05/28/201217:49 DAL1911 MD80 D 30R 89.4 05/06/201214:31 DAL2029 MD80 D 30R 89.3 05/28/2012 7:31 DAL1996 MD80 D 30R 88.9 05/08/201210:47 DAL1764 MD80 D 30L 88.7 05/29/201211:33 AAL2329 MD80 D 30R 88.1 (RMT Site #5) 12th Ave. & 58th St., Minneapolis Date /Time Flight Number Aircraft Type Arrival/ Departure Runway Lmax(dB) 05/14/2012 9:29 DAL1103 MD80 D 30L 94.8 05/11/201212:17 Unknown UKN D 30L 94.6 05/07/201213:06 Unknown UKN D 30L 94.3 05/09/2012 9:25 DAL1815 MD80 D 30L 94.3 05/09/2012 9:28 DAL1103 MD80 D 30L 93.9 05/27/201214:54 DAL41 B764 A 12R 93.7 05/11/2012 9:33 DAL1103 MD80 D 30L 93.5 05/13/201213:06 DAL1712 MD80 D 30L 93.2 05/21/201214:45 DAL1923 MD80 D 30L 93.1 05/30/2012 9:37 DAL1815 MD80 D 30L 93 (RMT Site #6) 25th Ave. & 57th St., Minneapolis Date /Time Flight Number Aircraft Type Arrival/ Departure Runway Lmax(dB) 05/01/201214:37 Unknown UKN A 12L 108.8 05/19/201216:22 DAL744 B757 A 12L 104.2 05/24/201214:30 AAL2293 MD80 D 30R 99.8 05/14/201219:24 DAL1328 MD80 D 30R 99.5 05/02/201213:21 DAL1496 MD80 D 30R 99.3 05/2112012 7:24 DAL1996 MD80 D 30R 99.2 05/25/201213:59 DAL1496 MD80 D 30R 99.1 05/06/201217:40 DAL887 MD80 D 30R 99.1 05/25/201210:25 DAL818 MD80 D 30R 99 05/24/2012 7:41 DAL1996 MD80 D 30R 99 -24- :� b Report Generated: 06/12/2012 13:56 Top Ten Loudest Aircraft Noise Events for MSP May 2012 (RMT Site #7) Wentworth Ave. & 64th St., Richfield Date /Time Flight Number Aircraft Type Arrival/ Departure Runway Lmax(dB) 05/29/2012 9:48 Unknown UKN D 30L 93 05/08/2012 9:26 DAL1815 MD80 D 30L 91.3 05/12/2012 9 :34 DAL1815 MD80 D 30L 90.2 05/12/201211:37 DAL1975 MD80 D 30L 89 05/30/2012 7:58 FDX420 MD11 D 30L 88.7 05/08/201213:36 AAL1220 MD80 D 30L 88.3 05/31/201211:38 DAL1975 MD80 D 30L 88.3 05/11/201219:58 N965DL MD80 D 30L 87.9 05/30/201212:32 AAL1390 MD80 D 30L 87.7 05/20/201211:35 DAL1975 MD80 D 30L 87.6 (RMT Site #8) Longfellow Ave. & 43rd St., Minneapolis Date /Time Flight Number Aircraft Type Arrival/ Departure Runway Lmax(dB) 05/09/201218:01 DAL887 MD80 D 30R 91.3 05/09/201210:45 DAL1764 MD80 D 30R 91.3 05/12/2012 7:20 DAL1996 MD80 D 30R 91 05/07/201213:23 DAL1496 MD80 D 30R 90.8 05/03/201217:37 DAL927 MD80 D 30R 90.6 05/30/201217:39 DAL887 MD80 D 30R 90.5 05/07/201210:46 DAL1764 MD80 D 30R 90.5 05/30/201218:12 AAL772 MD80 D 30R 90.1 05/08/201213:10 DAL1496 MD80 D 30R 90 05/30/201210:19 DAL818 MD80 D 30R 90 (RMT Site #9) Saratoga St. & Hartford Ave., St. Paul Date /Time Flight Number Aircraft Type Arrival/ Departure Runway Lmax(dB) 05/06/201211:01 Unknown UKN D 12R 88.2 05/19/201218:31 DAL1909 B763 A 22 83.6 05/23/2012 20:22 CPZ5690 E170 A 30L 83.4 05/19/201218:36 DAL265 8763 A 22 83.2 05/02/2012 6:45 BMJ48 BE65 D 04 82.7 05/23/201219:11 FDX728 MD11 A 22 82.6 05/23/2012 20:20 DAL 1712 MD90 A 30L 82.4 05/23/201218:47 TCF3507 E170 A 22 82.3 05/23/201218:55 FLG3333 CRJ9 A 22 82.1 05/23/201219:17 DAL1067 A320 A 22 81.8 Report Generated: 06/12/2012 13:56 �� -25- Top Ten Loudest Aircraft Noise Events for MSP May 2012 (RMT Site #10) Itasca Ave. & Bowdoin St., St. Paul Date /Time Flight Number Aircraft Type Arrival/ Departure Runway Lmax(dB) 05/23/201219:12 FDX728 MD11 A 22 90.1 05/23/201219:14 DAL1146 8738 A 22 87.7 05/19/201218:31 DAL1909 B763 A 22 87.7 05/02/2012 6:44 BMJ48 BE65 D 04 87.3 05/19/201218:36 DAL265 B763 A 22 86.8 05/23/201219:16 DAL1619 A320 A 22 86.5 05/23/201219 :24 DAL1987 A320 A 22 86.2 05/23/201219:00 DAL265 B763 A 22 85.6 05/23/2012 20 :17 DAL244 A320 A 22 85.4 05/23/201218:51 FFT100 A319 A 22 84.9 (RMT Site #11) Finn St. & Scheffer Ave., St. Paul Date /Time Flight Number Aircraft Type Arrival/ Departure Runway Lmax(dB) 05/09/2012 7:16 BMJ48 BE65 D 30R 82.1 05/25/2012 6:56 BMJ48 UKN D 30R 81.3 05/16/2012 6:49 BMJ48 UKN D 30R 80 05/09/2012 7:28 BMJ25 BE80 D 30R 78.3 05/27/2012 22:03 CPZ5720 E170 D 30R 77.3 05/12/2012 7:27 BMJ48 UKN D 30L 73.8 05/11/201219:48 N857RW E170 D 30R 73.1 05/11/2012 19:43 N840AY CRJ2 D 30R 71.2 05/11/201219:41 N356NW A320 D 30R 71 05/23/2012 20:22 CPZ5690 E170 A 30L 70.8 (RMT Site #12) Alton St. & Rockwood Ave., St. Paul Date /Time Flight Number Aircraft Type Arrival/ Departure Runway Lmax(dB) 05/23/201217:18 AAL331 MD80 A 17 80.9 05/03/201211:38 GLA248 8190 D 12L 80.1 05/24/201219:49 Unknown UKN A 30R 80.1 05/03/2012 7:14 BMJ70 BE65 D 12L 79.7 05/03/2012 6:57 BMJ54 BE65 D 12L 78.9 05/26/201215:37 CPZ5719 E170 D 12L 77.7 05/03/2012 7:05 BMJ62 BE65 D 12L 77 05/26/201215:47 DAL2196 A319 D 12L 76.4 05/04/2012 6:56 BMJ52 UKN D 12L 76.4 05/03/201210:59 DAL881 A319 D 12L 75.8 - 1 � 0 Report Generated: 06/12/2012 13:56 Top Ten Loudest Aircraft Noise Events for MSP May 2012 (RMT Site #13) Southeast end of Mohican Court, Mendota Heights Date /Time Flight Number Aircraft Type Arrival/ Departure Runway Lmax(dD) 05/14/2012 22:05 DAL1713 MD80 D 12L 87.1 05/06/2012 22:09 DAL1713 MD80 D 12L 86.1 05/18/201210:28 DAL818 MD80 D 12L 85.8 05/01/201210:16 DAL818 MD80 D 12L 85.5 05/17/201210:21 DAL818 MD80 D 12L 85.2 05/10/201210:19 DAL818 MD80 D 12L 83.6 05/22/201211:05 DAL818 MD80 D 12L 83.6 05/26/2012 7:19 DAL1996 MD80 D 12L 83 05/13/201210:28 DAL818 MD80 D 12L 82.9 05/23/201210:23 DAL818 MD80 D 12L 82.7 (RMT Site #14) 1 st St. & McKee St., Eagan Date /Time Flight Number Aircraft Type Arrival/ Departure Runway Lmax(dD). 05/04/201219:27 DAL1328 MD80 D 12L 89.2 05/20/201214:09 DAL1120 B757 A 30R 88.3 05/04/201210:30 DAL818 MD80 D 12R 88.3 05/08/201215:14 DAL41 B764 A 30L 87.9 05/18/2012 8:43 AAL1264 MD80 D 12R 86.2 05/05/2012 20:27 DAL1328 MD80 D 12R 86 05/24/201217:21 AAL1175 MD80 A 30L 85.7 05/14/2012 22:03 UPS559 MD11 D 12R 85.6 05/10/2012 8:48 AAL1264 MD80 D 12R 85.3 05/03/201212:06 DAL818 MD80 D 12R 85.2 (RMT Site #15) Cullon St. & Lexington Ave., Mendota Heights Date /Time Flight Number Aircraft .Type Arrival/ Departure Runway Lmax(d6) 05/03/201211:21 DAL1764 MD80 D 12L 92.4 05/01/201216:56 Unknown UKN D 12L 90.7 05/26/201210:22 DAL2096 MD80 D 12L 88.5 05/06/2012 22:09 DAL1713 MD80 D 12L 87.5 05/05/201214:01 AAL2293 MD80 D 12L 87 05/01/2012 7:00 BMJ72 BE65 D 12L 85.9 05/10/2012 22:03 DAL1713 MD80 D 12L 85.8 05/23/201218:57 AAL772 MD80 D 12L 84.9 05/01/201219:32 DAL1328 MD80 D 12L 84.8 05/18/201210:28 DAL818 MD80 D 12L 84.7 Report Generated: 06/12/2012 13:56 t Al -27- Top Ten Loudest Aircraft Noise Events for MSP May 2012 (RMT Site #16) Avalon Ave. & Vilas L n., Eagan Date /Time flight Number Aircraft Type Arrival/ Departure Runway Lmax(dB) 05/11/201216:36 DAL1968 B757 A 30L 95.2 05/28/201214:48 DAL41 B764 A 30L 91.8 05/26/201213:20 DAL1496 MD80 D 12R 91.7 05/04/201210:30 DAL818 MD80 D 12R 90.5 05/31/201216:22 DAL2392 B757 A 30L 90 05/27/201210:33 DAL1029 MD80 D 12R 89.8 05/11/201216:01 DAL41 B764 A 30L 89 05/08/2012 22:03 UPS559 MD11 D 12R 88.9 05/25/2012 22:05 UPS559 MD11 D 12R 88.3 05/03/201212:05 DAL818 MD80 D 12R 88.1 (RMT Site #17) 84th St. & 4th Ave., Bloomington Date /Time flight Number Aircraft Type Arrival/ Departure Runway Lmax(dB) 05/24/201213:52 SWAG 87377 D 30L 81 05/02/2012 6:55 BMJ64 UKN D 17 79.5 05/08/201211:29 SWA275 B733 D 30L 77.5 05/19/201213:48 CPZ5770 E170 D 17 77.2 05/13/201212:13 DAL1212 B757 A 30L 75.3 05/2312012 20:28 CPZ5723 E170 D 22 75.2 05/25/2012 6:55 DAL1981 B738 D 30L 75.1 05/23/2012 22:51 UPS9300 MD11 D 30L 74.7 05/08/201211:21 DAL2232 MD90 D 30L 74.7 05/08/201211:23 DAL1987 A320 D 30L 74.4 (RMT Site #18) 75th St. & 17th Ave., Richfield Date /Time Flight Number Aircraft Type Arrival/ Departure Runway Lmax(dB) 05/22/20125:01 FDX420 MD11 D 17 84.1 05/14/201211:49 DAL906 MD90 A 35 84 05/23/2012 20:27 CPZ5723 E170 D 22 84 05/05/201211:36 DAL1975 MD80 D 17 82.6 05/28/201216:11 AAL669 B738 D 22 82.2 05/17/201213:16 DAL1496 MD80 D 17 82.1 05/27/201212:53 SCX115 B738 D 17 82.1 05/01/2012 7:24 DAL1996 MD80 D 17 81.7 05/04/2012 7:51 AAL1872 MD80 D 17 81.6 05/19/201210:24 DAL2096 MD80 D 17 81.2 -28- A a Report Generated: 06/12/2012 13:56 Top Ten Loudest Aircraft Noise Events for MSP May 2012 (RMT Site #19) 16th Ave. & 84th St., Bloomington Date /Time Flight Number Aircraft Type Arrival/ Departure Runway Lmax(dB) 05/02/2012 6:54 BMJ64 UKN D 17 85.4 05/04/2012 7:02 BMJ64 UKN D 17 83.5 05/05/201211:36 DAL1975 MD80 D 17 82 05/10/201219:42 FLG3312 CRJ9 D 17 81.7 05/24/2012 9:57 CPZ5760 E170 D 17 81.6 05/10/201213:21 DAL1496 MD80 D 17 81.3 05/04/201211:11 DAL 1764 MD80 D 17 81.1 05/17/201211:31 AAL2329 MD80 D 17 81 05/0412012 7:51 AAL1872 MD80 D 17 80.3 05/17/2012 6:56 BMJ64 UKN D 17 80.2 (RMT Site #20) 75th St. & 3rd Ave., Richfield Date /Time Flight Number Aircraft Type Arrival/ Departure Runway Lmax(dB) 05/15/201217:05 N470MM B190 D 30L 81.1 05/31/2012 7:13 BMJ46 SW4 D 30L 78.5 05/23/2012 22:51 UPS9300 MD11 D 30L 78.4 05/11/201219:35 N689SW B733 D 30L 78.1 05/25/2012 7:12 BMJ46 SW4 D 30L 78 05/08/201211:27 CPZ5710 E170 D 30L 77.7 05/08/201211:29 SWA275 B733 D 30L 77.5 05/12/2012 6:43 FFT77 A320 D 30L 76.9 05/23/2012 22:49 ASQ5391 CRJ9 D 30L 76.9 05/25/2012 6:54 DAL 1981 B738 D 30L 76.9 (RMT Site #21) Barbara Ave. & 67th St., Inver Grove Heights Date /Time Flight Number Aircraft Type Arrival/ Departure Runway Lmax(dB) 05/22/201211:05 DAL818 MD80 D 12L 83.2 05/31 /2012 0:17 FDX2354 B72Q D 12L 81.7 05/23/201213:34 DAL1496 MD80 D 12R 81.4 05/03/201212:06 DAL818 MD80 D 12R 81.3 05/05/2012 9:39 DAL993 MD80 D 12L 81 05/22/2012 22:45 DAL1713 MD80 D 12R 80.3 05/27/201211:52 DAL2096 MD80 D 12L 80.1 05/04/201210:31 DAL818 MD80 D 12R 79.7 05/21/2012 22:12 DAL1713 MD80 D 12L 79.7 05/18/201210:29 DAL818 MD80 D 12L 79.3 Report Generated: 06/12/2012 13:56 `ii 3 -29- Top Ten Loudest Aircraft Noise Events for MSP May 2012 (RMT Site #22) Anne Marie Trail, Inver Grove Heights Date /Time Flight Number Aircraft Type Arrival/ Departure Runway Lmax(dB) 05/20/201214:51 DAL41 B764 A 30L 81.4 05/08/2012 5:18 UPS560 MD11 A 30L 81.4 05/31/201210:33 Unknown UKN A 30R 80.9 05/09/201212:30 DAL219 A330 A 30L 79.6 05/0312012 9:41 DAL1103 MD80 D 12R 79.2 05/0512012 9:45 DAL1815 MD80 D 12R 79 05/04/201215:31 DAL1664 MD80 D 12R 79 05/03/201210:04 CPZ5782 E170 D 12L 78.7 05/01/2012 4:58 FDX1718 MD11 A 30L 78.6 05/20/201214:08 DAL1120 B757 A 30R 78.5 (RMT Site #23) End of Kenndon Ave., Mendota Heights Date /Time Flight Number Aircraft Type Arrival/ Departure Runway Lmax(dB) 05/06/2012 22:09 DAL1713 MD80 D 12L 93 05/03/201211:21 DAL 1764 MD80 D 12L 92.5 05/01 /201219:32 DAL1328 MD80 D 12L 91.2 05/01/201210:16 DAL818 MD80 D 12L 90.9 05/13/201210:27 DAL818 MD80 D 12L 90.8 05/0512012 8:31 Unknown UKN D 12L 90.7 05/14/2012 22:04 DAL1713 MD80 D 12L 90 05/17/201210:21 DAL818 MD80 D 12L 89.5 05/13/2012 22:04 DAL1713 MD80 D 12L 89.5 05/10/201210:19 DAL818 MD80 D 12L 89.4 (RMT Site #24) Chapel Ln. & Wren Ln., Eagan Date /Time Flight Number Aircraft Type Arrival/ Departure Runway Lmax(dB) 05/04/201219:27 DAL1328 MD80 D 12L 87.2 05/20/201214:09 DAL1120 B757 A 30R 85.9 05/11/201211:54 DAL1056 MD90 A 30L 85.5 05/18/2012 8:44 AAL1264 MD80 D 12R 84.5 05/14/201215:40 ASQ4231 E145 A 30L 83.9 05/2912012 7:59 DAL1919 MD80 A 30L 83.7 05/2312012 8:45 AAL1264 MD80 D 12R 83.5 05/15/201213:22 BJS332 CL60 A 30L 83.1 05/28/2012 20:13 AAL1344 MD80 A 30L 82.9 05/13/2012 9:27 DAL1103 MD80 D 12R 82.7 -30- 4 Report Generated: 06/12/2012 13:56 Top Ten Loudest Aircraft Noise Events for MSP May 2012 (RMT Site #25) Moonshine Park 1321 Jurdy Rd., Eagan Date /Time Flight Number Aircraft Type Arrival/ Departure Runway Lmax(dB) 05/26/201210:17 DAL1815 MD80 D 12R 84.2 05/27/201210:33 DAL1029 MD80 D 12R 81.7 05/02/2012 20:19 DAL946 A320 D 17 78.8 05/18/2012 9:08 TCF3502 E170 D 17 78.6 05/01/201213:52 AAL2293 MD80 D 17 78.2 05/19/2012 7:48 DAL1996 MD80 D 17 78.1 05/10/201219:24 DAL1328 MD80 D 17 77.7 05/03/2012 9:40 DAL1103 MD80 D 12R 77.6 05/08/2012 21:28 DHL192 DC8Q D 12R 77.4 05/22/201210:23 DAL881 A320 D 17 77.4 (RMT Site #26) 6796 Arkansas Ave. W., Inver Grove Heights Date /Time Flight Number Aircraft Type Arrival/ Departure Runway Lmax(dB) 05/10/201214:31 DDAL2237 B757 D 12L 84.6 05/04/201210:30 DAL818 MD80 D 12R 84.4 05/30/2012 19:51 SKW4659 CRJ2 A 30R 83.9 05/27/201211:52 DAL2096 MD80 D 12L 83.8 05/24/201214:16 DAL2292 8757 A 30R 83.5 05/03/201212:06 DAL818 MD80 D 12R 82.7 05/21/2012 20:01 SKW4621 CRJ2 D 12L 82.4 05/05/201214:54 JZA7943 CRJ2 A 30R 82.4 05/05/2012 9:39 DAL993 MD80 D 12L 81.9 05/01/2012 8:34 AAL1872 MD80 D 12L 81.8 (RMT Site #27) Anthony School 5757 Irving Ave. S., Minneapolis Date /Time flight Number Aircraft Type Arrival/ Departure Runway Lmax(dB) 05/20/201213:35 DAL1496 MD80 D 30L 88.9 05/24/201211:40 DAL1764 MD80 D 30R 88.8 05/24/201211:40 DAL1764 MD80 D 30R 88.8 05/09/2012 9:26 DAL1815 MD80 D 30L 88.3 05/02/2012 9:35 DAL1103 MD80 D 30L 88.1 05/09/2012 9:28 DAL1103 MD80 D 30L 87.2 05/06/2012 9:34 DAL1103 MD80 D 30L 87.1 05/25/201210:51 AAL1390 MD80 D 30L 87 05/13/201213:06 DAL 1712 MD80 D 30L 86.8 05/16/201213:29 AAL1220 MD80 D 30L 86.6 Report Generated: 06/12/2012 13:56 q -31 - Top Ten Loudest Aircraft Noise Events for MSP May 2012 (RMT Site #28) 6645 16th Ave. S., Richfield Date /Time Flight Number Aircraft Type Arrival/ Departure Runway Lmax(dB) 05/15/2012 6:42 UPS2557 MD11 D 17 88.1 05/14/201213:37 ASQ4890 CRJ7 D 17 87.4 05/24/2012 7:13 UPS2557 MD11 D 30L 86.7 05/27/2012 20:23 DAL1636 MD80 D 17 86.4 05/04/201213:37 DAL1496 MD80 D 17 83.5 05/05/201211:36 DAL1975 MD80 D 17 83.3 05/20/201214:38 TCF3508 E170 D 30L 83.1 05/07/201218:24 SKW410P CRJ7 A 35 83.1 05/21/2012 12:03 DAL965 A320 A 35 83.1 05/14/2012 9:58 SKW4601 CRJ2 A 35 82.8 (RMT Site #29) Ericsson Elem. School 4315 31st Ave. S., 'Minneapolis Date /Time Flight Number Aircraft Type Arrival/ Departure Runway Lmax(dB) 05/01/2012 22:20 Unknown UKN D 30R 89.7 05/08/201211:36 AAL2329 MD80 D 30R 89.1 05/16/2012 7:42 AAL1872 MD80 D 30R 85.7 05/11/201211:33 AAL2329 MD80 D 30R 84.9 05/13/201213:24 DAL1496 MD80 D 30R 84.8 05/30/2012 7:36 BMJ48 UKN D 30R 84.2 05/21/201211:44 AAL2329 MD80 D 30R 83.5 05/29/2012 7:55 AAL1872 MD80 D 30R 83.2 05/11/2012 7:03 BMJ48 UKN D 30R 83 05/11/201213:53 AAL2293 MD80 D 30R 82.9 (RMT Site #30) 8715 River Ridge Rd., Bloomington Date /Time Flight Number Aircraft Type Arrival/ Departure Runway Lmax(dB) 05/04/201210:47 AAL1390 MD80 D 17 91 05/04/2012 7:21 DAL1996 MD80 D 17 90.4 05/04/201211:11 DAL1764 MD80 D 17 90.2 05/04/2012 9:34 DAL1103 MD80 D 17 89.1 05/26/201217:29 AAY5263 MD80 D 17 87.9 05/26/2012 7:10 AAL1473 MD80 D 17 87.9 05/10/201213:39 AAL1220 MD80 D 17 87.8 05/05/201211:20 DAL1103 MD80 D 17 87.6 05/03/2012 7:33 AAL1473 MD80 D 17 86.7 05/04/201217:52 DAL887 MD80 D 17 86.7 -32- `f Report Generated: 06/12/2012 13:56 Top Ten Loudest Aircraft Noise Events for MSP May 2012 (RMT Site #31) 9501 12th Ave. S., Bloomington Date /Time Flight Number Aircraft Type Arrival/ Departure Runway Lmax(dB) 05/24/201213:52 SWA6 B7377 D 30L 84.4 05/11/2012 7:17 AAL1473 MD80 D 17 80.9 05/22/201210:50 AAL1390 MD80 D 17 78.6 05/08/201211:24 DAL1987 A320 D 30L 783 05/10/201215:38 AWE92 A320 D 17 78.2 05/24/201210:10 CPZ5822 E170 D 17 77.4 05/26/2012 7:18 FDX645 DC10 D 17 77.4 05/02/2012 20:22 CPZ5836 E170 D 17 77.4 05/10/201218:51 AAL1197 MD80 D 17 77.3 05/02/2012 6:56 SCX8901 B738 D 17 77.2 (RMT Site #32) 10325 Pleasant Ave. S., Bloomington Date /Time Flight Number Aircraft Type Arrival/ Departure Runway Lmax(dB) 05/05/201219:54 Unknown UKN A 04 82.3 05/01/2012 7:26 DAL1121 8738 D 17 78.1 05/11/2012 7:18 AAL1473 MD80 D 17 77.8 05/17/201216:51 ASQ4231 E145 D 17 77.3 05/28/201215:14 SCX425 B738 D 17 76.4 05/04/201219:05 DAL265 B763 A 35 75.7 05/22/201210:50 AAL1390 MD80 D 17 74.6 05/10/201215:38 AWE92 A320 D 17 74.5 05/23/201211:31 DAL1067 A320 D 17 74.5 05/24/201210:04 DAL2168 B763 D 12R 74.3 (RMT Site #33) North River Hills Park, Burnsville Date /Time Flight Number Aircraft Type Arrival/ Departure Runway Lmax(dB) 05/22/2012 9:10 TCF3544 E170 D 17 84.3 05/22/2012 9:12 DAL2392 B757 D 17 82.8 05/03/2012 7:34 AAL1473 MD80 D 17 82.7 05/03/201213:26 AAL1220 MD80 D 17 80.4 05/13/201210:39 AAL1390 MD80 D 17 79.7 05/27/2012 20:24 DAL1636 MD80 D 17 79.1 05/01/201210:51 AAL1390 MD80 D 17 78.6 05/28/201213:24 AAL1220 MD80 D 17 78.2 05/04/201218:43 AAL1197 MD80 D 17 78 05/19/201214:32 AAY8502 MD80 D 17 78 Report Generated: 06/12/2012 13:56 M -33- Top Ten Loudest Aircraft Noise Events for 'MSP May 2012 (RMT Site #34) Red Oak Park, Burnsville Date /Time Flight Number Aircraft Type Arrival/ Departure Runway Lmax(dB) 05/18/201210:48 AAL1390 MD80 D 17 78 05/02/201217:09 CPZ5846 E170 A 35 76.2 05/11/2012 8:04 FDX420 MD11 D 17 76 05/03/201211:17 DAL1029 A320 D 17 75.4 05/04/201210:10 DAL1687 A320 D 17 75.3 05/07/2012 7:45 FLG4172 CRJ2 A 35 75.2 05/28/201210:48 AAL1390 MD80 D 17 75 05/11/2012 9:26 DAL1815 B738 D 17 74.7 05/06/201219:12 FDX728 MD11 A 35 74.5 05/11/2012 9:11 DAL1751 MD90 D 17 74.4 (RMT Site #35) 2100 Garnet Ln., Eagan Date /Time :Flight Number Aircraft Type Arrival/ Departure Runway Lmax(dB) 05/21/201211:49 Unknown UKN A 35 87.1 05/07/201211:50 DAL1230 A320 A 35 86.3 05/05/201211:20 DAL1103 MD80 D 17 85.8 05/18/201211:39 DAL1975 MD80 D 17 85.2 05/27/201213:31 AAL1220 MD80 D 17 85.1 05/28/201212:46 DAL1975 MD80 D 17 85 05/22/201213:13 Unknown UKN D 17 84.9 05/11/2012 7:41 DAL1291 B757 D 1 17 1 84.2 05/04/201217:52 DAL887 MD80 D 17 84 05/12/201215 :08 AAL668 8738 A 35 83.7 (RMT Site #36) Briar Oaks & Scout Pond, Apple Valley Date /Time Flight Number Aircraft Type Arrival/ Departure Runway Lmax(dB) 05/14/2012 8:48 DAL340 MD90 A 35 87.3 05102/2012 7:42 GLA245 B190 A 35 87.3 05/09/201210:10 SKW4583 CRJ2 A 35 86.9 05/02/2012 7:32 CPZ5701 E170 A 35 84.9 05/28/201212:46 DAL1975 MD80 D 17 84.3 05114/2012 9:56 SKW4601 CRJ2 A 35 82.5 05/03/201216:43 UPS2560 MD11 A 35 82.1 05/0712012 8:46 SKW4549 CRJ9 A 35 81.7 05/15/2012 9:59 DAL784 B757 A 35 81.7 05/30/201212:15 Unknown UKN A 35 81.3 -34- 1 �8 Report Generated: 06/12/2012 13:56 Top Ten Loudest Aircraft Noise Events for MSP May 2012 (RMT Site #37) 4399 Woodgate Ln. N., Eagan Date /Time Flight Number Aircraft Type Arrival/ Departure Runway Lmax(dB) 05/01/2012 9:30 DAL1815 MD80 D 17 83.1 05/03/201214:03 AAL2293 MD80 D 17 82.9 05/23/201213:33 AAL1220 MD80 D 17 82.3 05/04/201217:53 DAL887 MD80 D 17 82 05/17/201213:30 AAL1220 MD80 D 17 81.5 05/19/201213:29 AAL1220 MD80 D 17 81.2 05/03/201212:53 AAL2329 MD80 D 17 80.1 05/26/2012 7:43 AAL1872 MD80 D 17 80.1 05/04/2012 7:22 DAL1996 MD80 D 17 79.7 05/22/2012 7:17 AAL1473 MD80 D 17 79 (RMT Site #38) 3957 Turquoise Cir., Eagan Date /Time Flight'Number Aircraft Type Arrival/ Departure Runway Lmax(dB) 05/01/2012 9:29 DAL1815 MD80 D 17 88.2 05/04/2012 7:22 DAL1996 MD80 D 17 85.3 05/22/201211 :41 DAL1975 MD80 D 17 84.7 05/04/201211:12 DAL1764 MD80 D 17 84.5 05/22/201210:41 DAL 1764 MD80 D 17 84.4 05/23/201213:33 AAL1220 MD80 D 17 84.3 05/04/2012 9:35 DAL1103 MD80 D 17 84.3 05/17/201213:16 DAL1712 MD80 D 17 83.9 05/10/2012 9:31 DAL1103 MD80 D 17 83.1 05/19/201213:28 AAL1220 MD80 D 17 82 (RMT Site #39) 3477 St. Charles PI., Eagan Date /Time Flight Number Aircraft Type Arrival/ !Departure Runway Lmax(dB) 05/10/201219:24 DAL1328 MD80 D 17 87.4 05/10/201217:47 DAL887 MD80 D 17 86.9 05/18/2012 7:25 DAL1996 MD80 D 17 86.4 05/19/201210:25 DAL2096 MD80 D 17 86 05/18/201211:38 AAL2329 MD80 D 17 85.5 05/01/2012 7:25 DAL1996 MD80 D 17 85.4 05/17/2012 7:30 DAL1996 MD80 D 17 85.4 05/22/2012 7:43 DAL1996 MD80 D 17 85.2 05/18/201217:54 DAL887 MD80 D 17 85.2 05/03/201213 :34 DAL1496 MD80 D 17 85.2 May 2012 Remote Monitoring Tower Top Ten Summary The top ten noise events and the event ranges at each RMT for May 2012 were comprised of 76.7% departure operations. The predominant top ten aircraft type was the MD80 with 55.6% of the highest Lmax events. May 2012 Technical Advisor Report Notes Unknown fields are due to unavailability of multilateration flight track data. Report Generated: 06/12/2012 13:56 "'ACA -35- Analysis of Aircraft Noise Events ®NL May 2012 Remote Monitoring Towers Date #1 #2 #3 #4 #5 #6 #7 #8 1 #9 #10 #11 #12 #13 ! #14 #15 05/01/2012 59.7 63.6 64.7 64 69.5 70.8 59.2 59.5 42.8 46.2 NA 45.6 54.6 58 59.7 05/02/2012 55.3 57.4 62.1 59.7 67.7 68.8 57.5 57.5 52.1 55.5 45.9 NA 56.8 .58.8 57.5 05/03/2012 55.5 57.9 62.5 61.2 68.4 68.9 58.8 56.8 44.6 29.2 NA 50.5 47.1 60.5 54.3 05/04/2012 59.7 61.2 66.3 60.7 69.8 65.9 44.3 44 46.3 38.4 NA 48 58.5 62.3 61.5 05/05/2012 57.4 58.8 64.5 58.8 67.9 64.5 48.6 49.3 40.4 42.4 NA NA 52.4 58.7 55.9 05/06/2012 54.6 56.2 60.8 58.4 66.5 68.6 58.6 58.3 44.6 NA NA 36.1 58.4 62.1 61 05/07/2012 52.9 56 56.3 60.6 66.2 68.6 61.8 60.1 34.6 NA NA 25 36.9 59.6 41.9 05/08/2012 54.7 58 57.3 59.5 65 68.5 59.8 58.8 'NA NA NA NA 57 61.6 56.6 05/09/2012 50.9 50.1 55.8 56.1 64.8 67.5 59.1 58.7 36.4 39.3 44.2 NA 54.6 60.8 54.4 05/10/2012 56.8 61.4 62.7 61.9 66.8 68.2 53.7 55.4 NA NA NA NA 57.3 59.8 60.6 05/11/2012 57 57.4 62.6 59.3 67.7 68.2 59.6 58.2 45.8 NA 36.7 33.6 56.4 60.2 58.5 05/12/2012 47.1 48.7 51.3 53.8 62.2 65.3 58 57.7 30.7 39.2 33.9 NA 43.6 58.4 41.2 05/13/2012 51.8 52.9 58.5 54.9 64.2 64.7 54.1 56.9 NA NA NA NA 54.6 59.3 53.7 05/14/2012 52.7 52.4 58:9 56.6 65.2 68 55.5 58.2 NA NA NA NA 57.5 61.5 56.7 05/15/2012 54.4 55.3 57.7 59 64.6 68.1 60.8 59.3 NA NA NA NA 27.4 58.4 41.6 05/16/2012 52.7 53.8 60.1 56.9 66.3 67.1 58.7 57.6 44.4 46.2 49.8 NA 55.2 59.3 55.9 05/17/2012 58.2 60 64.3 60.3 67.6 65.7 39.6 NA NA NA NA NA 58.2 59.4 60.3 05/18/2012 58.8 60.2 65.1 60.3 68.7 65.2 36.1 44.6 36.9 36.2 NA 45 55 60.8 59.3 05/19/2012 56.2 56.8 62.2 59.5 66.8 66.5 54.3 54.1 48.1 52.3 32.5 38.3 54.1 58.2 55.8 05/20/2012 55.9 58.6 58.7 61.1 65.5 69.4 61.1 58.3 NA NA NA NA NA 58.1 34 05/21/2012 53.4 54.1 60.7 57.3 66.7 67 58.1 57.8 NA NA NA NA 56.1 58.8 57.7 05/22/2012 57.1 59.7 64.5 60.5 68.2 65.3 41.3 39.1 NA 30 NA NA 57.6 59.1 59.5 05/23/2012 58.7 58.6 63.7 60.7 68.6 67.8 58.4 56.5 53.6 55.7 34.7 38.6 53.9 60.8 57.4 05/24/2012 57.1 59 61.2 62.7 68.7 70.7 63.1 60.8 35.8 37 39.4 40.7 48.8 62.1 51.2 05/25/2012 54.4 56.4 60.3 58.7 66.8 69.1 58.9 60.4 40.6 39.2 52.1 NA 53.7 61.7 55.1 05/26/2012 58.4 59.5 64.6 59 68.7 64.5 46.9 44.6 40.4 28.7 NA 42.9 54.3 60 57.9 05/27/2012 55 56.3 61 57.1 65.5 65.6 48.8 55.9 411 NA 46.8 NA 54.2 58.5 56.1 05/28/2012 49.3 53 53.3 58.4 62.1 66.7 56.4 57.3 32.1 35.6 27.4 NA 44.3 61.9 43.1 05/29/2012 54.6 55.7 59.1 59.4 67.3 68.7 63.4 59.8 32.2 42.3 NA NA 41.3 59.9 46.7 05/30/2012 53.3 57.7 55.9 59.9 65.7 68.8 61.7 60 NA NA 24.6 NA 57.5 59.2 57.3 05/31/2012 52.8 55.7 57 58.8 65.1 67.9 59 58.8 NA NA 43 NA 56.6 60.1 56.2 Mo.DNL 55.9 57.9 61.7 59.7 67 67.8 58.4 57.5' 43.6 45.3 41.3 39.8 55 ' 60.1 57 -36- 50 Report Generated: 06/12/2012 13:56 Analysis of Aircraft Noise Events DNL May 2012 Remote Monitoring Towers Date #16 #17 #18 #19 #20 #21 #22! #23 #24 #25 1 #26 #27 #28 #29 05/01/2012 58.9 32.5 57 51.4 NA 47.6 50.2 62.3 55.2 51.3 53.4 52.1 57.8 60.6 05/02/2012 62.6 49.4 53.2 54.4 46.7 49.1 54.7 62 57.8 52.7 52.1 56.8 54 49.7 05/03/2012 63.5 NA 51.7 48.1 NA 44.1 54.1 59 58.3 46.3 54.2 57.3 54.6 49.1 05/0412012 64.2 35.2 55.4 53.3 31 48.5 50.2 65 59 56,5 54.9 36.3 56.8 NA 05/05/2012 59.7 27.9 51.4 48 NA 47.4 46.5 61.2 55.2 52 54.3 46.4 53.4 45.5 05/06/2012 NA NA 43.3 26.8 42.2 50.2 53.8 65.1 60.2 52.2 54.7 54.2 54.1 50.2 05/07/2012 62.5 NA 47.6 47.3 36 42.4 56.3 52.6 59.8 NA 51.7 57.8 56.6 55.7 05/08/2012 66.4 41.5 49.5 48.3 46.2 52.1 57.8 62.9 60.3 53.8 53.8 56.2 55.2 57.1 05/09/2012 63.9 NA 54.5 49.4 35.1 47.4 '54.6 59.4 58.8 49.4 51.2 56.6 52.6 52.1 05/1012012 62.7 NA 55.9 52.9 NA 49.6 54.3 63.2 57.8 56.8 52.1 51.7 54.5 50.8 05/11/2012 63.6 33.6 52.1 49.3 43.8 50.6 55 63.1 59.5 47.4 53.9 54.9 53.7 55.5 05/12/2012 62.8 39.9 49.9 48.9 47.9 36.4 54.4 52.1 57.3 47.8 51.5 52.8 54.1 49.4 05/13/2012 62 41.9 47.9 45.1 42.8 52.1 52.4 62 57.4 44.9 54 53.1 48.3 49.6 05/14/2012 63.1 26.8 49.8 44.1 28.6 49.4 55.1 62.7 59.9 44.4 54.9 55.3 51.5 51.8 05/15/2012 64.4 NA 50.6 48.9 45.3 30 54.8 42.8 59.2 38.8 37 55.5 58.2 54 05/16/2012 62.9 28.5 55.6 49.5 NA 51.1 55.1 60.4 57.7 47.3 52.2 55.8 52.3 53.7 05/17/2012 62.4 NA 56.6 53.4 NA 52.5 NA 63.6 57 54.7 54.6 33.4 55.1 NA 05/18/2012 61.4 NA 54.1 48.7 NA 45.8 53.3 62 58.4 55,6 54.8 49.7 51 39.7 05/19/2012 59.9 37.4 51.8 46.1 33.4 47.6 52.7 60.3 56.3 51.6 51.8 48.6 54.9 42 05/20/2012 62.5 NA 40.2 NA 32.9 NA 55.3 44.6 58.6 32.6 41 55.8 56.2 51.9 05/21/2012 62.7 NA 50.8 47.7 NA 53.2 50.4 61.9 57.4 49.4 53.8 55.6 53.7 50.2 05/22/2012 60.9 28.8 54.9 48.3 NA 53.7 NA 63.2 56.8 53.4 54.5 35.1 52.1 NA 05/23/2012 64.6 50.1 56.6 49.8 54.1 47.7 NA 60.9 59.8 51.3 52.7 53.3 60.3 59 05/24/2012 65.8 453 44.4 43.2 46.8 43.7 NA 57.6 61.7 47.2 53.1 59.2 58.7 52.8 05/25/2012 66 46.1 50.3 51.6 47.8 50.3 NA 60.2 61.2 49.3 53.8 58.7 52.2 53.8 05/26/2012 61.1 38.3 51.2 47.2 NA 50.5 NA 61.6 56.8 53.1 52.7 45.4 52.6 38.7 05/27/2012 62.8 42.1 48.4 41.8 48 46.2 NA 61.3 57.3 49.6 57.1 38.3 50.9 50.4 05/28/2012 65.1 40 48.9 45.7 40.2 40.9 NA 55.3 61.5 NA 52 52.7 51.5 51.4 05/29/2012 64.3 45.1 50.2 45.4 41.4 42.3 NA 47.1 60.4 39.5 48.9 58.8 57.9 57 05/30/2012 63.9 NA 53.8 50.8 31 49.4 50.9 62 59.2 48 52.3 56.8 57.4 55.3 05131/2012 64.2 38.4 51.1 48.1 43.6 55.6 56 62 59.2 56.1 53.7 56.2 53.7 51.3 Mo.DNL 63.2' 41 52.7 49.2 43.7 49.5 52.7' 61.3' 58.9 51.5 53.3 54.9 55.2 53.2 Report Generated: 06/12/2012 13:56 1 5 { - 37- Analysis of Aircraft Noise Events ®NL May 2012 Remote Monitoring Towers Date #30 #31 #32 #33 #34 #35 #36 #37 1 #38 #39 05/01/2012 60.1 45.8 39.5 46.3 40 51.3 52.3 48.9 52.6 54.6 05/02/2012 62.4 52.2 48.9 46.2 38.4 55.4 55.2 26.7 29.5 47.5 05/03/2012 59.2 41.4 33.1 49.2 43.5 52.6 56.2 47 49.3 51.3 05/04/2012 61.6 43.5 37.9 46.4 38.1 50.2 45.8 50 53.5 54.4 05/05/2012 56.9 43.4 42.4 40.6 35.2 47.3 33.1 43.8 46 48 05/06/2012 43.5 NA NA NA 31.3 50 52.5 40.7 NA 38.3 05/07/2012 59.4 42 NA 42.7 45.9 56.8 57.5 43.5 NA NA 05/08/2012 60.6 46.3 41.5 46.1 37.4 58.3 58 48.5 43.3 NA 05/09/2012 61.2 45.3 47.2 47.5 48.9 56 57.2 47.8 31.4 40.6 05/10/2012 61.9 49.6 42.4 48.2 45.9 54.3 49 47.8 '51.4 54.8 05/11/2012 58.8 42.4 38.2 48.8 45.7 54.8 56.4 48.1 50.1 48 05/12/2012 57.9 NA 40.5 46 47.4 52 55.2 40 NA NA 05/13/2012 57.9 47.1 44.5 41.4 31.9 52.8 52.5 42.6 45.2 41 05/14/2012 58.7 43.4 38.6 44.7 43.8 55.1 54 48.6 27.8 NA 05/15/2012 60.9 NA NA 46 46.2 57.3 57.2 47.7 NA NA 05/16/2012 60.5 37.7 26.5 47.6 46.2 55.2 55.6 36.2 42.5 45.9 05/17/2012 58.9 46.5 36.2 42.8 29.3 49 40.6 47.8 52.2 54.1 05/18/2012 58.3 43.8 36.7 44.2 41.4 48.6 39 45.9 49.5 55.1 05/19/2012 56.2 42.4 37.7 42.1 40.6 48.1 43.4 45.9 49.3 52 05/20/2012 48.8 NA NA NA 28.2 50.3 54.1 NA NA NA 05/21/2012 60.8 43.4 40.2 45.4 47 56.4 56.5 47.9 41.3 42.2 05/22/2012 58.2 45.3 37.5 50.8 34.9 47.1 40.1 47.2 51.4 53.8 05/23/2012 57.3 46.2 43.4 41.6 30.6 48.2 49.3 44.4 50 54.9 05/24/2012 52.8 43.9 37.4 34.1 NA 51.3 55.4 36.8 39 35.5 05/25/2012 60.8 45.8 NA 49.4 45.6 56.7 56.7 45.7 43 39.1 05/26/2012 57.7 46.3 41.6 42.1 38.5 45.2 34.6 45.8 46.8 45.1 05/27/2012 52.9 33.3 NA 41.2 33.6 45.3 35.2 40.4 44.6 48.6 05/28/2012 59.1 43.5 42.4 49.5 45.7 54.7 55.2 43.3 32.5 NA 05/29/2012 51 NA 38 NA 41.1 54 56.8 36.3 NA NA 05/30/2012 59 NA NA 49 36.8 51.9 55.4 49.2 53.1 46.4 05/31/2012 60.8 47.9 48.5 46.2 49.8 54.6 56.7 42.1 NA NA Mo.DNL 59.1 44.7 41:3 46 43.5'' 53.6 54.3 45.9 47:.5 49.4 -38- 5D Report Generated: 06/12/2012 13:56 m 3658 Carrier Jets Departed Runway 17 - 5/1/2012 - 5/31/2012 Metropolitan Airports Commission Runway 17 Departure Analysis Report - 5/1/2012- 5/31/2012. Report Generated. 0611212012 13:57 1 - 54 Runway 17 Departure Overflight Grid Analysis Runway 17 Carrier Jet Departure Operations - 5/1/2012-5/31/2012 3638 (99.5 %) Westbound Carrier Jet mmmmmmmm 20 (0.5 %) Carrier Jet Departure Departure Operations flying the Runway 17 Jet Operations turned west before passing over the Departure Procedure (passing over the 2.5 NM turn Runway 17 2.5 NM turn point. This is 1.5% of 1367 point) and Runway 17 eastbound Carrier Jet westbound departures Departure Operations Metropolitan Airports Commission Runway 17 Departure Analysis Report - 5/1/2012- 5/31/2012. Report Generated: 0611212012 13:57 - 2 - 55 Runway 17 Nighttime Carrier Jet Departure Operations - 5/1/2012 - 5/31/2012 40 Nighttime Carrier Jet Departure Operations off of Runway 17 in 5/1/2012 - 5/31/2012 (10:30 p.m. - 6:00 a.m.) 0 (0 %) Westbound Carrier Jet 4 (10 %) Westbound Carrier Jet Departures turned west between 2.5 and 3.0 NM Departures turned west after 3.0 NM from start of from start of takeoff and remained over the takeoff and remained over the Minnesota River Minnesota River Valley (trending with Runway 17 Valley (trending with Runway 17 River Departure River Departure Heading) Procedure) 1 (2.5 %) Carrier Jet Departures turned 5 (12.5 %) Remaining westbound Carrier west before passing over the Runway 17 2.5 NM Jet Departures flew the Runway 17 Jet Departure turn point Procedure (passing over the 2.5 NM turn point), and with an enroute heading to the destination airport 30 (75 %) Other Nighttime Carrier Jet Departure Operations Metropolitan Airports Commission Runway 17 Departure Analysis Report - 5/1/2012- 5/31/2012. Report Generated: 0611212012 13:57 -3- Remote Monitoring Tower (RMT)Site Locations te »r 2 - » > �} \( . I mam Me tropolitan 9± Commission Ru _« e Departure Analy ARe port - m701S5a,2Z@z Report m_A±0 13:57 -4- !-Y Analysis of Aircraft Noise Levels - DNL dBA 5/1/2012 - 5/31/2012 Date #30 #31 #32 #33 #34 #35 #36 #37 #38 #39 1 60.1 45.8 39.5 46.3 40 51.3 52.3 48.9 52.6 54.6 2 62.4 52.2 48.9 46.2 38.4 55.4 55.2 26.7 29.5 47.5 3 59.2 41.4 33.1 49.2 43.5 52.6 56.2 47 49.3 51.3 4 61.6 43.5 37.9 46.4 38.1 50.2 45.8 50 53.5 54.4 5 56.9 43.4 42.4 40.6 35.2 47.3 33.1 43.8 46 48 6 43.5 NA NA NA 31.3 50 52.5 40.7 NA 38.3 7 59.4 42 NA. 42.7 45.9 56.8 57.5 43.5 NA NA 8 60.6 46.3 41.5 46.1 37.4 58.3 58 48.5 43.3 NA 9 61.2 45.3 47.2 47.5 48.9 56 57.2 47.8 31.4 40.6 10 61.9 49.6 42.4 48.2 45.9 54.3 49 47.8 51.4 54.8 11 58.8 42.4 38.2 48.8 45.7 54.8 56.4 48.1 50.1 48 12 57.9 NA 40.5 46 47.4 52 55.2 40 NA NA 13 57.9 47.1 44.5 41.4 31.9 52.8 52.5 42.6 45.2 41 14 58.7 43.4 38.6 44.7 43.8 55.1 54 48.6 27.8 NA 15 60.9 NA NA 46 46.2 57.3 57.2 47.7 NA NA 16 60.5 37.7 26.5 47.6 46.2 55.2 55.6 36.2 42.5 45.9 17 58.9 46.5 36.2 42.8 29.3 49 40.6 47.8 52.2 54.1 18 58.3 43.8 36.7 44.2 41.4 48.6 39 45.9 49.5 55.1 19 56.2 42.4 37.7 42.1 40.6 48.1 43.4 45.9 49.3 52 20 48.8 NA NA NA 28.2 50.3 54.1 NA NA NA 21 60.8 43.4 40.2 45.4 47 56.4 56.5 47.9 41.3 42.2 22 58.2 45.3 37.5 50.8 34.9 47.1 40.1 47.2 51.4 53.8 23 57.3 46.2 43.4 41.6 30.6 48.2 49.3 44.4 50 54.9 24 52.8 43.9 37.4 34.1 NA 51.3 55.4 36.8 39 35.5 25 60.8 45.8 NA 49.4 45.6 567 56.7 45.7 43 39.1 26 57.7 46.3 41.6 42.1 38.5 45.2 34.6 45.8 46.8 45.1 27 52.9 33.3 NA 41.2 33.6 45.3 35.2 40.4 44.6 48.6 28 59.1 43.5 42.4 49.5 45.7 54.7 55.2 43.3 32.5 NA 29 51 NA 38 NA 41.1 54 56.8 36.3 NA NA 30 59 NA NA 49 36.8 51.9 55.4 49.2 1 53.1 46.4 31 60.8 47.9 1 48.5 46.2 49.8 54.6 56.7 42.1 NA I NA Av. DNL 59.1 44.7 41.3 46 43.5 : 53.6: 54.3 45.9 47.5 1 49.4 Metropolitan Airports Commission Runway 17 Departure Analysis Report - 5/1/2012- 5/31/2012. Report Generated: 0611212012 13:57 - 5 - 55 Aircraft Noise Levels DNL d BA 5/l/2012-5/31/2012 RMT Aircraft DNL Aircraft DNL Aircraft DNL Aircraft DNL ORD 05/01/09-05/31/09 05/01/10-05/31/10 05/01/11-05/31/11 05/01/12-05/31/12 30 61.4 62.9 63.1 59.1 31 493 47.2 49.4 44.7 32 42.9 42.8 44.9 41.3 33 44.8 49.9 48.7 46 34 43.5 46.6 46.7 43.5 35 53.3 53.7 53.3 53.6 36 53.6 53.3 53.6 54.3 37 47.7 49.6 48.1 45.9 38 50.1 52.1 51.6 47.5 39 50.8 53.6 54.2 49.4 Top 15 Runway 17 Departure Destination Report Airport City Heading (deg.) #Ops Percent of Total Ops ORD CHICAGO (O'HARE) 124° 212 5.8% DEN DENVER 237° 177 4.8% MDW CHICAGO (MIDWAY) 124° 169 4.6% ATL ATLANTA 149° 162 4.4% DFW DALLAS/ FORT WORTH 193° 128 3.5% PHX PHOENIX 231° 121 3.3% STL ST LOUIS 160° 96 2.6% MKE MILWAUKEE 114° 92 2.5% IAH HOUSTON 185° 91 2.5% EWR NEW YORK 106° 91 2.5 % LGA NEW YORK (LA GUARDIA) 105° 78 2.1% CLT CHARLOTTE 133° 77 2.1% PHL PHILADELPHIA 111° 74 2% CVG CINCINNATI 127° 72 2% LAS LAS VEGAS 243° 72 2% Metropolitan Airports Commission Runway 17 Departure Analysis Report - 5/1/2012- 5/31/2012. Report Generated: 0611212012 13:57 -6- 1 May 2012 Crossing -in- the - Corridor Analysis Minneapolis -St. Paul International Airport This report is for informational purposes only and cannot be used for enforcement purposes .r Metropolitan Airports Commission May 2012 Carrier Jet Departure Operations Runways 12L & 12R (23:00 - 06:00) 101 Carrier Jets Departed Runways 12L & 12R between the hours of 23:00 and 06:00 Crossing -in- the - Corridor Analysis. Report Generated: 06/12/2012 12:12 Page 1 W Metropolitan Airports Commission May 2012 Carrier Jet Departure Operations Performing the Crossing Procedure off Runways 12L & 12R (23:00 - 06:00) 62 (61 %) Carrier Jets Crossed After Departing Runways 12L & 12R between the hours of 23:00 and 06:00 Page 2 Crossing -in- the - Corridor Analysis. Report Generated: 06/12/2012 12:12 (0 a Metropolitan Airports Commission May 2012 Carrier Jet Departure Operations Runways 12L & 12R (06:00 - 23:00) 3095 Carrier Jets Departed Runways 12L & 12R between the hours of 06:00 and 23:00 Crossing -in- the - Corridor Analysis. Report Generated: 06/12/2012 12:12 Page 3 (D Metropolitan Airports Commission 1 1 , Carrier Jet Departure Operations Performing the Crossing Procedure off Runways 12L & 12R (06:00 - 23:00) 904 (29 %) Carrier Jets Crossed After Departing Runways 12L & 12R between the hours of 06:00 and 23:00 Page 4 Crossing -in- the - Corridor Analysis. Report Generated: 06/12/2012 12:12 (Q 4 ITEM 5 TO: MSP Noise Oversight Committee (NOC) FROM: Chad E. Leqve, Manager— Noise, Environment and Planning SUBJECT: RUNWAY USE ANALYSIS DATE: June 27, 2012 The 2012 Noise Oversight Committee (NOC) Work Plan includes a review of the nighttime runway use at Minneapolis -St. Paul International Airport (MSP). In addition, at the March 21, 2012 NOC meting the committee directed staff to study "where aircraft using Runways 12L and 30R for nighttime departures are coming from and the actual impact of noise for those departure operations, and the issue of how many operations using the river valley procedure off of Runway 17 are eastbound and how many are westbound." In consideration of the March 21 Committee request related to runway use, staff has expanded this analysis to include 24 -hour runway use totals and runway use totals during northwest operational flows and southeast operational flows. Additionally, the analysis was expanded to include analysis of the specifics surrounding Runways 12L and 30R departure operations and Runway 17 departures including direction of flight and Minnesota River Valley Departure Procedure usage. Specifically, the attached analysis contains the following: ■ 2011 and January to May 2012 all operations and carrier jet nighttime runway use totals ® 2011 and January to May 2012 all operations and carrier jet nighttime runway use totals during northwest flow and southeast flow 2011 and January to May 2012 all operations and carrier jet 24 -hour runway use totals 2011 and January to May 2012 all operations and carrier jet 24 -hour runway use totals during northwest flow and southeast flow 2011 and January to May 2012 Runway 30R/12L Nighttime Departure Fleet Mix Regional Jet composition analysis January 2011 through May 2012 Runway 30R/12L nighttime departure operations percentage of RMT DNL levels analysis ■ 2011 and January to May 2012 Runway 17 River departure procedure direction of flight analysis At the July 11, 2011 NOC meeting staff will provide a briefing on this analysis. t. it a \ N o \ N d . o \ O \ 1711- DO � m 00 I, lD O ! ! p r-i Ol O o� �.� ° O G7 h N N u'1 m I Q) O M lD N cN-i O 0) n ° ": 00 C* Dl M C7 O a: ,,� N N N T c-i O O j i rlI ri O n ul ri V1 Ql lD V) �': N O in O N h to O M I ° m co w D hp O m O ° l LD O o O r c-I :I dO' 1 N i -1 m Q I I +' m oo !-- oo !- O I M! m N In Ol O� m N ca I* I Co l0 e O 6l H t Ol O d' N N to uo N b LO m N N N d' n ° c) O m IN � G1 N N N CT) U , ) O O to l0 N 0 of N U ! N c--I eh lD V1 i N � V' '�t N m N d' 0 m 0 !\ 0 0 0 o p V 111 !, oo d' m m L N W lD Ln 61' O L) !- m a d' oo C' N O N N O O N c�-i c�-I O N N N cn-I O � T 3 t4 ! op H ct N n Ln O N d' Ol l0 O N O m O rn Ln t :O in N to l0 O Ln of �-I� m m m m V' bA O c-i O M O M M O O N N O O N m N fn > a I C' O N N (� m Ln ( m .-+ LD oo LrI �'1 aj O 1-1 'd' m f Y) N N m �f' Ol N l.0 t` Ln n m �-1 r"! O N - of Ql 00 O v N d' N r.l `-i c-1 i c-I H H d' _07 i o i c o 0 0 0 0 - UU... n I-� N ci CT) N Lo m M r 1- In m N n O N oo O O c-i o W 0 I� 0 O 0 C l o �--I o o o a -i o 0 c' o m�° LM Ln - f4 fC to N cn m c-1 Ol to O M In ci N O lD N lD c-I M o) m N d: lD N I� m N O O O -1 N N ri N Q n ++!! = i to LD !- N of N N m to W 07 t` m N CY 'cl' m M O N n N :. O! O to O to �-i o7 O H i n m n O W �7 m to lD d' :eNi. O!! vl m O c-I lD lD O o0 oo m Ln d' m oo to O oo LD U ! N i [t oo (1 , as l 0 � \ 0 O (D C) \ 0 \ ° t� O m m tD G) W Oo � p O O O O Ol 0 n O H u1 W N L O �h r-! Ln O O O Ol c-I O CD O ° n o o o 0 0 o o -'� m °N o ..� I T I I m o n to N O m N c-i O CD N j N H m N O CY � H M m oo Ch - 0 N m O m W O M S do O d' �!' m O to Ln O Ln O M ' i O (D M i , > -I c Q. z l0 m N lD N q M Gl U ON d' m lo. 00 N CO ro d � I 0)1 3 ! T r VN e� l�D lD c l�D � c i Ln 7 W cn n lOO N N H e-i � r N i N Ln I Ni -{ e i I ! 1 i i I O � 0 0 to ! O 'ct N H N n --I N N O m O m Lr) m j ct ci ri rl N m M M i c-i L i Co Y O j I L � L Q Q � t. it NOW 0 (Y) 111 U - ) 1- 1 m 00 m `n 0 0 0 r-q r- D' ro Lo fl, N m Lrl -i - C> c-! r - I N m r-4 N N IH N M. zt 0 Itt Ln m LD co I�t m C) It _q H -4 O 0) N O V) (.0 C) o lzt o 00 o H 0 � V) 't tD 03 cri CDC 0 m 1--i O N N O rm 0 U') m 0 m N N 0 to -i LD IZT w m 0 C) -1 m 1-1 M m 4 0) 00 I.D r- Lr) H 0 N 1 -1 m m r- r-i ry) ^ N Ln P Ct N m N N CD Cl) CD tzj 00 IZI a) 0 0 0 m C) Qo 0 V) CL) m 00 �.q 0 6 06 o 6 m !n II M` 0 -Zt r- co I-i N cli 0 0) C) Lo tl- 0 Izil cr) m 0 a) o 0 0 o 0 o 0 o e4 0 0 r-i o CD C) 0 C) CD 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N m r- 0 00 0 r-i r1i C) Lr) Lr) 0 (7) 0 LM � N r m . { tD N 0 U ".,4 (-4 00 r � a) N C t�o 00 CD 0 . r-4 Lo 00 U) cr C � N m 't CD Zl zt r-4 N o C) N C) 0 LM cD -i uo o N r- v) :T --i -q V) O . . 0 . C . N ::r . O (D . 0 Iq . 0 1--1 . C) 0 . 0 H . W 0 . C) m . lzt m . Q0 0 . 0 0 . C) Ln . �i w . 0 m . 0 V t V) ' j- U') 0 Lr) It 00 H m m �o a) r, m m 0 Lr) oo It O1 �.D cr) 0 Lr) Lr) u) N r1 Lr) !n I-i Ln m N r-I Lr) Lr) LO C) (D �o M r- CD 0 0 r- N 0 m r� c q 0 N . . 0 N H O m N O O O to m O O N 0 tri. Ai ,w m N 0 O 00 N Do Ln o -i C:) to N V) ) q o cr) 0) o o N N Do co o 0 CD CD r- N V) rn . 0 . C) . C) . 4 . 0 . N cr) . r-q . 0 . LD . 0 . -q CD 4 l6 6 0 Z Lo Lr) 0 0 Lr) Do �t Lr) N r-i -q V) T-q Ln 0 k.D 'tt Lf) 00 C) m V' Ln 0 1 -0 00 00 LD d' P a) O :. . M m 00 r- Ln N It LD ul) rn rm rl 00 a): o II N r� N C C) V) N r fl N O C) !_7 H H H N m m N M M M f13 'C N 0 E"<t oN pp� Q p � � V K' c � u M o m n O m Om N I O I O N O CF) N ri 0 r� O O V .0 1 � O O N O N N O.t OI O O O N � TI m ri o N m r N j M m O r N u) N �--� 'J1 m O lD o r` ui `' 4 m r j t o LLn oo ul Lo O m N O N d' O, N O O W c-i O N m N H Ln Ln Q` 1 ++ ' o m O d' i U.) m Q1 M _ O t\ m N N 01 M u') N I cN N � oO u ri � c-1 O 0 C? ID f O lD N t` M d' m lD LI) H n7 O 1 :t N I I 61 ri t` lJ Ol L') ul m u ul lD m lD l.D d' , U N H V' Lr1 u) e-I m m m ci M Q1 p M I i O p U CD r m rn n m M u1 m ul ri , O LJl DO d' r-- lD m CT) r- W m In DO l7 O �., O O tD u') dJj O Ln h d' , d 4 of 4 N O N OI N c� O N ON In r t �� C o mi ri ri oO Lr) n N I\ O I O 'n N M M O m lD p ui O Ln m m o m un � � m D� a o o m m � D r i N bA O r-1 O M O M m O H O H i-1 O O N m N N C Q ! ++ j O' N O d' O rr) O ^ co O O i O:I oo lD m c-i N N N N M j tOl1 r ri 1\ lrD k.0 r c-I d m W c-i ri c-i ri 1 j of , c-i C j' .�'. 41 C o N l 0 0 0\ i 0 \° Q 0 0 0 o O W � m zzl o r_j M N N o I O. L7 r- O N u-) co lD N O L: o o H � � r o {{ a i � � V) Ln 1--i o oo o 'O.li O N O N O O O O. 0 O W R O O r-I ri O O- A, fE.:i pl c-I Ln I-I N u1 O ca Ln c-i co ^ l!7 M m m O N Ln - L �. O n n"1 N lD O N m d. O m ri lD: 1 W 0 01 n N m O O �-1 ri C3 Ql m cn ri c-i N N r-I Ol Q ri ri 0 LO j m m I Ln N N M Obi m r co Ol o N H co m n+ H N 0) CM M d' LD lD o cn 00 O �: o! m ri ri I- ^ tD Ln ! N N ch m Ln m m r, Ln N � u< N ri m (^ m m n o O 'L O O O 0 O O o O o D O D D 0 O V i ,N j U'I d r-1 lD lD W N Ln m �--1 O O O L ra O N N N lD Zo N 01. O Ql N O O O 0 -= O ri ri Ln O I� CY G` O. O O O c-i O O O m m M N. N O - . :C.:1 � aj T' I 4/ �m ! m M d' O d' V) m m m lD Lo ri O M O m O O Ln 0) ri lD CT) a ID N (7; D6 O O Cl clJ O O 1 1 cy) m O t M O ci O N m O O � N � ri > O .Q ci ri M ri M z 41 oo Ol lD "! N � M lJ r- O Ln 'm. 3 Ol c-i N Dl DO t11 m d' ^ ri Do c-i C M N W '�. 0: lD ri m ri tzt lD m �. O O r-I m ri c-1 �Y 'Y m .0 ; Ln M d' m I :N ®_ I I O O Q ~ O ,Q �:H. N N I N O O 3 Lr) i N N I N O O V'1 !4 > Q� Ct r-I ri N m m m @ ri N m m m ` m i RT a, Q ' O K' r� N Cl Y! C o 0 0 \ 0 c 0 o \ j \i o o o CD j N - i V ,. m 0 6l N O h N h O N lD h l CD O 3 O L l L il Ol N e-i m h Ln O OJ Ln O N _ o OI I I O � O N O tl O m. N O O i m 61 U. M N co lD -4 O ] m d' 00 zt h M �--i k.0 N ti ❑ O N O m O O Ol O O 3 O M cY O O r h ^tir hAi O m n1 1-I O N rH O, O j O to W O O O fNY1 �I '~ 3 O c-I O 00 1 t m 'T I l0 ° 'Ol N co V'' LO a) M h N Ln 00 'Zt h ^ 1 O c N c CJ h u1 ci M N i m O N Ol [i' h h O.i i � f � I I v! O� � O 1 O O N co O O W . ct L) clJ G1 h �t O dJ N O L O V) d Lq L d O O Ln (�l O O f O O O h 1* N O O N lD O O 0 O r-I M ci I . m O m LO N r-i N N O� w O lD lD o ¢t h m O LD O D i O o O O O O O O e-1 O O C O O O O O O O O Oj O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 j c; O€ O CD N 01 N b h Oi Ln O N � O O 'T o N M I O? 1 1 ( 1 � C i o O \ O \ 0 0 0 0 0 O o ° ° c o ° o o O v, O 0 -4 Ln Ol Zt O� O u1 � N h :i' Oh M d' O s-: M Ln N lD c-I 'ct N 'O 0' N N O h M O EL O O N N O O e-I O M O O ul N O t-1 T cc i N O l7 l0 rq d' N D ri' m m m :I c-i N Ln H a O o Ln m m o c-1 H 01 m o r Ln o o m � m L hAi O N N O O O O O Ln. o :T lD O o H O O M Q' O i N ro O �0 LD O [t m u5 AD O O> CJ M VN' O 1 Ln m -i N N ^' U ; C}' M C. e \ 0 0 c 07: 00 W 'I: Ql ul '' Ln O D7 U 1 h m O' O d' Ln O Ln CF) m Lr) Ln q `i cH O O N c.D O c -1 CL.. O � O � II-i O M N. 'O O O tD Ol O O � M N O ei ei i-i O k.0 h Ln lD 't Ol -4 O N Ol H 00 H OI O �' O o ul r-i 00 h O O m O 'ZY N M co Ln Q 00 9. O O O O O r-1 r-I O L0 O 1-1 1--1 O O Ol Ln O o a z c€ 00 h Q0 M N d' N r-1 O N l0 m. Q N{ O N Ill O O m h h N Lr) n Ct Ln c lD N II d lD �l N LD ooi i ;I b_A m i y 0 Q` �� J N (Y N h N J o •L' O L Ln J N � N h N J O � O L7 a J d e I ^i N m m M " ;t H i-1 e-1 N M m M •� ;i L � 9 m � Q � N Cl 10 �/� � �� 4 C �� \�� : 2 \ {w. \�;�\ �/� � �� \�� /� �� \�� : 2 \ {w. \�;�\ �� «� \�� 2 �/� �� 2 k�, \ } �} L!j lie er Ass gill ...................................................................... . . . . . . . . . . -so ...... . . . . . . . . . Nzell to WIN Ave WX Nil . . ....... . INA ............ er Ass ...................................................................... . . . . . . . . . . -so ...... . . . . . . . . . 10 V1, . \�.��3 \i��•. „ - :�: r 1 a � » � K � \ \ C \ }< )� ) 7� - ! �f: f , 6] ) r 1 a � » � K � \ \ • • 4 i ro lD N o 11 �D C) It `1 Lr) O m '! 0 0 q t C; r1l r Lrl C3 Lfi C) C CD 6 C) c; O N 6 a) m r 1--i N M m t" 00 00 111 r-q C) N 'Zi m r" r- Do ry) N r! r4 Lri N. N bo. Zt CD Q0 'T LD 0 r CD CD 0 N C 6 0) LO Ln r-q _q r-1 --I Lm < N 0 U) rH QO r� r- Ln N Lr) u1 ) -i nl) �.D :I Lr) co Lo LID Ln (7) i11 ) Ln r14 rl m 00 LD N 0) Lrl (Y) r-1 l n) IH r-i Lf) Lo r" LD C3) It V) H co 'e CD 0 U) 't N 0 0 l.D 0 0 Lr) 0) C� r Q0 r 4 0 O. 0 C) Lr) CD 6 LJ -i 6 6 C s 6 6 O m H N N N N 0 Ln �t Lq 0 'T m 1-4 0 m H 0 m m m �.o 0 :T 0 Ln 0 00 N 0 0 LD m m to : 0 N "i L") 0 4 4 61 6 4 4 6 6 ni m r� 00 > m co nl) lzr It I 0 C) H r-4 N 0) r- m Ln Do 0 m rl 1.0 0 h 0 N 0 U') i1) 00 Lr) Lr) rr) -i Lq H N 0 CD N rr) H H r-q _q C) C) m N q 0 H r-1 i CD Lf) Ln O C' '-D 00 0) 0 --1 C) 0 m Lf) N rq Ln m LD r" 1-i 00 m m rl L r) L.0 00 m m CF) N tzr Q1 o 'i O LR O "i L� '4 o o o o '-4 o o O H co 0) N m :T r-q CY) C) �D Ln 0 0) 'm �D 0 Lr) N H cc Ln fl- 0 Ln Lr) m LD m Ln C) Lr) Lr) rn C C , (.0 It It "I rr) 0 m 0 N 00 11) 111 ) DO 0 r� m LD 0 r- 1--1 0 O 1 .0 0 C) L-6 6 C 6 It '4 4 C) CD 0 H c; r- c6 co 0 r-1 r-4 H 0 r- - m r� r� m C) In m C) U r, 6 ^ q 06 q In Ln H 41 cn: 6 L'6 In 6 Ln m o N o m Ln M H H M 41 00 00 LO qr Lr) rl nl) 00 r-q 00 -_o Lr) ID n*) m 0 m 'Z� 1-i - zzl - cr) m 00 N 0 00 0 1-1 It m C) 0 m 0) r , Lr) 00 C) Tt Ln (3) 00 m O m Ln OBI E r N N r- N C) Lr) -j N rl N E 0 Ln cY r-1 H H N --q --i -i rj m ro m M '9 2 d L oe9 N fV q 1 L L 0 0 ! c-I O ) Ql N '�"i c-i N o W o r r,� o 00 m O O n tD d . tT a) O lzt m 00 N 61 01 O O d' o O Ln n (7) I p, N m e-i Iq e-1 1 Ql 1-1 m m 1-I M( I • m i N Ln d' lD r-i N co O 1 tT -q �--i ci ^i C) N Ln r) f0 0 0 on O o O0 c-i �--� m N r O o N c c-I mo O o; c� ai O Ln O O r, cY +. co N N m i ^ m r-I N o Ol lD z' m C* rl- 0) N lD � o j m r-1 m ri N r m m m U ; I 'i I Ln r-I c-I co d' 1 lD 1 O U O 0) O co N O O O -1 O O N O O i O co O O O O Ln O O O cv O M n O m Oj O O o� N O O O O Q. V m . a m i i O m co N O 00 �t O N O 00 r- O O O ca O M p 0' O O O O O O O O j N O O N O O �t -1 O m C W o O O O O O O o O. O O O O O O O O O >' f 3 t �€ o U) m o of m o o o w N o n 01 �� a 1 eq v i . � 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 '01 o O a!i u; O t` Ln w � m -I O O O r N o Ln O u u N O L o 05 m w co o r o 0 o n o r QO r» o c i r- i o O o � o o� 4 <4 o a' - m Ml O m ci 1t c-1 O 1-1 O Ln O N Ln c-i s-i Lo 61 ul O d 0.1 O O m c-I O �q d O r\ O O m N N 06 O O O O O Ln O N O O > O Qi Ln i i ,7 O Lfl ul N O O (- O m L!") e-i N N Ln O Wt 0: <-i m N Ln o') Ln i-I N 0) m 0) U C'3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 { I o oo \c o o \° � 0 -_ y; W O n O O O I N O a' O Ln O O v-i UDD C � m N Ln i o r 01 O j O O c O O r- C1 - . O O O N m a; cn �= N �t lD O O Ln m O m r-I 1-1 1-i O O m Ln O d . 0 O n c-I o Ln o O ri O r-I lD O O Ln of N bAi O O o H c-i O+ Ln O c-1 N O O Ql � O >i � z �1 m m 0 uo rn 00 o.; m -q o L) o -1 o o L7 m � o ,- Iq N I n -q m , v � i Ln O f F 0 o Q. :H `O C O � N N r N O O Ln N N rl N O O Ln S M .� y Q q 1 S : o 's C� u� M I "°°r ° r ° N Li Li O m I� 0 <-I lD 0 ri 03 CT d: O O. O N N 1-1 ri o O N M Ol Ql m N O I L O N et r u ' 1 O 0 oo Ln O O 0 O O O O O O o O b M I-i O O c 0) a.:i ri N � N ri � f9 r1 Lr) O O N Lf1 LD i-I -1 r-i LD M O C) 00 01 In O N C) d; CV) m O r-i O Q1 O N m LD D 00 m m O ch m O e O O o O O Ln CT) N � 03 p > Q ri r I -I Lf) rH H ri tf) 1 4 ` of I LO I� c-I m,� 7:s N O M --I N m d' r- 00 O ri CI' a) O Cr M a) OD m Ln � N M Ol Ln m c o p i 0 O Ln o N O Do Ln Ln cr 00 M tb 1-1 N N N 1 N r-i ri r-i r-I r-i Ir rLr)-i e' N N N N N N N Nl o N N N N N N N N o a u O Ol O N ri O d' L n dl lD O O O m N Ol W O Cl DJ Ql LD I- of O O O O O u1 C a O tt1 M O N N O O O N N O O - N Iq O .i C � 2 i m O O Ln ri O ri Il O N O W LD O Cr) r M LIl Cl N O LD M O O co LD O O M LD -1 N O Ln O 't m O W O m M O O M m N rOi C ¢: O O L11 m O N O I Ln co - 0 O m V ri m I O O r to O M O Ln Ln Ln 0 Ln Ln Ln m, M O U I N N tf'f l =N N N N N o N N N N N N'o U 0 00 O O O O O O M a . O 00 lD M ul O j L. O o N N O O O ri O m 11'1 Ln; O 011 O N'D M O O O O O O 0 ' , 00 O O O O O O fp e0 O r-i 00 ° O U') C) ,-1' L O M w ri O LD O Ln m W o O Ln ct O O p N ri m O O DDi O I` Lfl N m O O O O O Q1 O C) C) u'1 C7) O O ri r-I ri O O >;; Q , ri csoi ~ m I LD M O M lLr) `� 00 O �: 3 O 00 It LD O r-1 O O ct cF m N N L ri LD ri O O OJ d r I M ri ri m tm =.H. N N N N N N o N N N N N N N N o O' o Do O) I ri C7) lD O O O ri DO O N m Ln H O a O r-1 h ri O O'. C O ri lD O O O N ri LD O N V' O 0 O c-1 ri O O O � N a: d eo° ri O e-1 � N � r O. O O oo M O h C W UD C o lD O �: O N O m ri O O � � d: F , :bD o LD L!1 ri O lP N o O o m m o O 00 ri co O m (Y) m l 'ii LM m Ol L r O N N 0 N M Ql cF O' O O ri I*l O 0 r lD N v-i N m O! ° CO N r I D1 LD Ln r- m of m 0 N N r ri ri ri m.I I 0 1 N N 1� N 0 0 L11 .` N N n N 0 O Ln N m m m c1' N m m m �- ++ i-i ri ri ` ri r-i r-i a L .I d Q 'C% L ` CJ .. C ) M I "°°r • s� m d o� O ri m O lD m r o O O o r o m N p m °? d O t L rn p p o p p p c» ° o o r- 0 0 0 m o o rn ri o[ a 1 O N L,) 0 O O m O O O. i o r 1l r•1 0 tt ri o v-1 o m o o d Q O M' O N ri O t-i ri O W O M o O O o V1 O foYl a C 1 ri N O'J Uo Li) i 't m f" "t ' O i N lD 1-1 h O ri 1-I O I N O O l.7 O lD N lD U) 00 O N d' r'i N c-i �'l ri W Ct L11 O j � 00 m O m r, O O O O N O O -1 W O O! o m o 0 0 0 ':T o 0 0 0 cu O N o6 O m '.6 O o O O6 N O O , O 0 i Iq o m I N O co d' O O 1- d' O O W i" O OI O O O O O O O O O N O O N O O m 1-1 O m O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O � �� Q 41 C? S O Ln o M O lD O M O m O O ) N O. ri:�I O! v �€ E- 0 d O M d 00 o u'l O 1- In O O O Q1 0 u'1 0 )n O N m m 11) O Ol O m ri D p. O O O l.D W Q O O m O -.0 m O N M O O O CIO M O O N 'cY ri O a: 41 N Ti �1 d m O ri o m O 00 -1 o m O co ri ri O 01 1.0 N O 'O ;I O O O ri O O -1 O m o ri tD o O C u1 N + '40� O 14 N O O O O O m O N r-� O O ri O O N o Q' cn +J c 7 O lLn 0° 0 O O 0 m ri O N m Ln q li M c chi Ln n , e�-I 00 U e, o m m� rn o 0 o a o o o i W o. °� n LO o° m r` ° o o m° o r- ri m d o f rn N O O O O O _4 �--I lD O O O O N O r-I O O 1- � N N A= 41 'f0 ri f` d' N O lD c--I O N o Ln to O O lD 1� m lD lD O O N O O lD O O d' O O 1 lD ri f\ :bD: O O O ri O r-1 c 4 O q 4 O c „ 1 0 a' ri m N 0 '� 1Ln p 0) m U') ) 0 0 0 LDD r O 0 M -1 r ° 0 ° O -: �-1 °� ri ri ri h c-1 m M r .1 t N ' N m I U' i I 1 O .L 1 . n N O O Lr) a 3 N N 1` N O O ul i--t N m m M c-i e-i ri N m m m C @ 'o Q .L f0 ++ > U @ a Q I m \ \® \ 2 «y . A . y \ !I � » § - rq ;■ \� �� /: � �� a a «° - rq CN te r c C 1 . 1 �� AIN CL 0 031 ............ ............. .. .. 9A, ca .. ..... ... n b ' All LL g te r c C 1 . 1 �� AIN CL 0 031 ............ ............. .. .. 9A, ca .. ..... ... n b n b 0 q q ITEM 4 AVRIEMORANDUM TO: MSP Noise Oversight Committee (NOC) FROM: Chad E. Leqve, Manager — Noise, Environment and Planning SUBJECT: REVIEW NOISE ABATEMENT DEPARTURE PROFILES (NADP) DATE: June 27, 2012 At the March 21, 2012 Noise Oversight Committee (NOC) meeting the Committee took action to address the South Minneapolis Runway 30R northbound aircraft departure issue. One of the points included in the committee action was a "request that MAC staff conduct an analysis of NADP on 30R and 30L and report the effects of each NADP procedure at the next NOC meeting in May." Prior to the May 16, 2012 NOC meeting staff completed an analysis of the effects of Noise Abatement Departure Profiles (NADP) at Minneapolis -St. Paul International Airport (MSP). However, shortly before the May NOC meeting HNTB, the MAC's consultant on the project, discovered there were inconsistencies between their procedure modeling criteria and procedure criteria used by Delta Air Lines when flying NADPs. Therefore, the item was tabled until the July 2012 NOC meeting. Staff and HNTB have revised the analysis and the related information in this memorandum. The following information provides background on NADPs and related history at MSP, the newest version of the Integrated Noise Model (INM) 7.Oc that was used in the analysis, the development of the INM NADP aircraft departure profiles, changes from previously modeled and analyzed profiles, and results of the NADP impact analysis. Background Noise Abatement Departure Profiles (NADP) In the early 1990s, the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) responded to numerous requests for unique noise abatement departure procedures by studying the viability of using different procedures off different ends of runways at the same airport. The result of exhaustive testing at the John Wayne /Orange County Airport (SNA) in Santa Ana, CA was FAA advisory circular (AC) 91 -53A, published in 1993. The AC establishes guidelines for airlines in the development of NADPs including minimum operating parameters for airlines to use in developing operating procedures. The AC establishes a standardized system so that an aircraft will use the same operating procedures throughout the world. Each airline develops specific procedures for flying NADPs that are approved by the FAA and that must comply with the provisions of the AC. Airports are permitted to decide the appropriate NADP to use on each end of its runways. Unless otherwise instructed, airlines will typically use the Distant NADP. The AC establishes both a Close -In and Distant NADP. The Close -In NADP generally is intended to reduce noise slightly for communities within the immediate vicinity of the runway end — approximately 3.5 miles from the start of takeoff roll — while the Distant NADP is intended to reduce noise slightly for other communities that are not within the immediate vicinity of the runway end (beyond 3.5 miles from the start of take -off roll). �n When using a Close -In NADP, an aircraft maintains takeoff thrust and flaps longer than it would when using a Distant NADP. This results in a slightly quicker climb close to the airport and slightly reduced noise exposure for homes within the immediate vicinity of the airport directly under the aircraft departure path. After reaching 3,000 feet, however, a Close -In NADP aircraft must substantially reduce its rate of climb and accelerate to a sufficient airspeed to retract flaps and slats. Although the aircraft is slightly higher, it is also slower and at a higher thrust setting longer than an aircraft using a Distant NADP. Beyond the immediate vicinity of the airport, this results in a slight increase in noise exposure. For modern high - performance jet aircraft, the noise impact difference between the Close -In and Distant NADPs is minimal. NADPs at Minneapolis -St. Paul International Airport (MSP In August 1997, per the direction of the Metropolitan Aircraft Sound Abatement Council (MASAC), the Metropolitan Airports Commission (MAC) implemented NADPs at MSP designating the Distant NADP for Runways 12L, 12R, 22 and 04 and the Close -In NADP on Runways 30L and 30R. The use of the Close -In NADP on Runways 30L and 30R was predicated on the existence of Stage 2 aircraft at the time and the associated reduction of population within the 65 dB DNL contour that was provided by use of the Close -In NADP. The benefits associated with the Close -In procedure are greatest when used by Stage 2 aircraft and hushkitted Stage 3 aircraft. Prior to the 1997 decision to implement NADPs, MSP aircraft operations included approximately 51 % Stage 2 aircraft operations and only 49 % manufactured Stage 3 aircraft operations. As the national aircraft fleet transitioned to an all Stage 3 fleet, the benefits of the Close -In NADP also diminished. One of the recommended noise abatement measures in the November 2001 MSP Part 150 Update Noise Compatibility Program (NCP) was the implementation of an NADP for each runway at MSP. MASAC conducted extensive research and analysis during the Part 150 Update process to establish the appropriate NADP for each runway end at MSP considering the present and future trends in the aircraft fleet mix and noise impacts out to the 60 dB DNL contour. Based on the MASAC analysis, it was determined that noise impacts for all communities were minimized by using the Distant NADP off all runways at MSP when considering noise impacts in the 60 dB DNL noise contour and the areas that received the 5 dB noise mitigation package around the airport. Additionally, the post -2000 transition to quieter Stage 3 aircraft at MSP had the effect of significantly reducing the differences between the two procedures. As a result of the various analyses, MASAC approved the Distant NADP off all runways at MSP and forwarded recommendation of its use in the November 2001 Draft Part 150 Update document where it was approved by the MAC Full Commission. Considering the MASAC analysis conducted in 2000, previous agreements /decisions regarding the use of the Distant NADP on all runways at MSP, and the request by the FAA for the implementation of the Distant NADP on Runways 30L and 30R for safety reasons, on June 26, 2003 the Noise Oversight Committee (NOC) unanimously recommended a change in the NADP for Runways 30L and 30R from the Close -In to the Distant NADP, and reaffirmed MASAC's previous position through maintaining incorporation of the measure in the November 2004 Draft Part 150 Update document. On July 22, 2003 the MAC Full Commission approved the change. Shortly thereafter, operators at MSP began implementing the Distant NADP off Runways 30L and 30R. Following the NADP change, the NOC conducted an analysis of the effects. It was determined that the monitored noise data were consistent with the assumptions considered as part of the previous community input, evaluation, and the NOC decision on the implementation of the Distant NADP over South Minneapolis. U12dated Integrated Noise Model (INN) 7. ©C The FAA- established mechanism for quantifying airport DNL noise impacts is the Integrated Noise Model (INM). The availability of federal or airport- generated funds for the purpose of noise mitigation efforts such as sound insulation is contingent upon the development of a Noise Exposure Map (DNL noise contours) in a manner that is consistent with the federal criteria (i.e., INM and DNL). The INM is used to assess the noise impact of aircraft operations. The model uses input files consisting of information relative to runway use, flight track use, aircraft fleet mix, aircraft performance and thrust settings, topography information, and atmospheric conditions to generate a Noise Exposure Map. The computer model generates contours, typically represented in 5 -DNL increments, which depict an annualized average day of aircraft noise impacts. Quantifying aircraft- specific noise characteristics in INM is accomplished through the use of a comprehensive noise database that has been developed under the auspices of Federal Aviation Regulation (FAR) Part 36. As part of the airworthiness certification process, aircraft manufacturers are required to subject aircraft to a battery of noise tests. Through the use of federally adopted and endorsed algorithms, this aircraft - specific noise information is used in the generation of INM DNL contours. Justification for such an approach is rooted in national standardization of noise quantification at airports. The FAA Office of Environment and Energy (AEE -100) developed the INM. Since 1978, the INM has been the FAA's standard tool for determining the predicted noise impact in the vicinity of airports. The INM is designed to estimate long -term average effects using average annual input conditions. The MAC used INM Version 7.Ob to develop the 2011 Actual Noise Contour Report published in February 2012. However, the FAA has recently released INM version 7.Oc which includes database updates and the correction of minor software issues that existed in version 7.0b. The FAA website explains the model updates as follows: "INM Version 7.Oc includes approach noise data updates for many existing Airbus aircraft types, which are considered to better represent the approach noise generated near an airport and address a reference speed assumption issue in the INM Version 7.Ob approach noise data for these aircraft. The affected aircraft types are the: 9A300 -622 9A310 -304 oA319 -131 oA320 -211 eA320 -232 oA330 -301 eA330 -343 oA340 -211 oA340 -642 oA380 -841 oA380 -861 INM Version 7.Oc includes an updated standard aircraft substitution list. 22 new aircraft are added to the substation list, 38 substitutions are modified, and 8 are deleted. The update is based on comprehensive review of aircraft configuration, aircraft aerodynamic performance, noise certification levels, and noise contour area comparisons. INM Version 7.Oc includes the addition of several new aircraft types to the INM system database, including five Cessna business jets, four Bell helicopter and two floatplanes, many of which are used in air tour operations at national parks in the US. The new aircraft are the: Bell 206B -3 *Bell 427 •Bell 429 &Bell 430 &Cessna Citation, CJ4, Model 525C *Cessna Citation Encore, Model 560 *Cessna Citation Ultra, Model 560 *Cessna Citation Excel, Model 560 &Cessna Citation Sovereign, Model 680 *Cessna Skylane Model 182S with amphibious floats *De Havilland Canada DHC -2 Beaver with floats. INM Version 7.Oc also includes noise data updates for many existing aircraft types, many of which are used in air tour operations at national parks in the US. The affected aircraft types are the: &CNA182 &CNA208 DO228 *D0328 & PA42 R44 9SC300C. Minor corrections were also made to the data for several existing aircraft for INM Version 7.0c, details of which can be found within the INM 7.Oc Release Notes." Staff used INM version 7.Oc to conduct the NADP analysis. It is important to note that use of INM version 7.Oc increases the size of the 2011 actual noise contour by approximately 3% when compared to the 2011 actual noise contour developed with INM version 7.015 in the Annual Noise Contour Report published in February 2012. NADP INM Profile Development In conjunction with the MAC, HNTB (the MAC's consultant on the INM profile development project) identified a series of aircraft representing the loudest and most frequently used under a number of noise exposure scenarios, including 2010, 2011, and to the forecast fleet mix for 2020 and 2025. MAC staff provided a list of noise model aircraft, the frequency of operations, and comparative noise levels based on data contained in FAR Part 36. Noise model input files for each year of analysis were provided, which included the INM noise model aircraft type, the trip distance (represented by stage length), and the number of operations. For each fleet mix and year, the top 15 contributors, based on cumulative noise energy, were identified. The table below provides the top 15 contributors to the cumulative noise environment by year, and summarizes the percentage of all departures captured by these aircraft. Proposed Custom Profile Aircraft Operations Ops Year 2010 2011 2020 2025 Top 15 Dep 486 507 554 614 Total Dep 597 596 664 721 Top 15 % 81% 85% 1 83% 1 85% Source: MAC, HNTB Analysis, 2012 As shown in the above table, the top 15 aircraft represent between 81% and 85% of all departures from MSP depending on the year of analysis. Based on the overlap of aircraft in between the years of analysis, a total of 20 unique INM noise model aircraft were selected for NAPD profile development. A total of 20 aircraft with 82 unique stage lengths were identified, resulting in the development of 288 custom profiles. Profiles were developed for the following aircraft: -, 737 -700 737 -800 747 -200 747 -400 757 -300 767 -300 767 -400 777 -200 757PW A319 -131 A320 -211 A321 -232 A330 -301 CLREGJ DC10 -10 DC9Q -9 EMB170 MD11 EG MD81 MD9025 Creation of Custom Delta NADP Profiles Delta Air Lines provided aircraft - specific information from the list above for aircraft operated by the airline at MSP. The data include information pertaining to speeds, thrust settings and specific aircraft operational data for the Close -in and Distant procedures. A total of thirteen INM noise model aircraft were included in the development of Delta custom NADP profiles, including the 737800, 747400, 757300, 757PW, 767300, 767400, 777200, A319 -131, A320 -211, A330 -301, DC9Q9, MD81, and MD9025. For this analysis, an aircraft using the Delta Close -In NADP begins its takeoff roll and lifts off the runway at takeoff thrust and takeoff flaps. The aircraft then climbs to 1,500' above field elevation (AFE) (or 1,000' AFE, depending on aircraft type), at which point the thrust setting is reduced to climb thrust. The aircraft continues to climb to 3,000' AFE at climb thrust with takeoff flaps. At 3,000' AFE, the nose is lowered and the aircraft accelerates to 250 knots as flaps are retracted on schedule. The aircraft then climbs to 10,000' AFE. 91= A Delta Distant NADP profile is generally similar to the Standard takeoff procedure used in INM, in which the aircraft begins its takeoff roll and lifts off the runway using takeoff thrust and takeoff flaps. The aircraft then climbs to 1,000' AFE, where the thrust setting is reduced to climb thrust. At this point, the aircraft lowers the nose and accelerates to 250 knots, retracting flaps on schedule. The aircraft then climbs to 10,000' AFE. Sample flight profile data for the Boeing 757, as provided by Delta, are shown in Figures 1 and 2. Note: .Far as irn edktc utrn aAu r " failnre, windsh are orany -nonnal at£,:.tn it , offlit t 53 — dtAo, W ffflap; w)di - mw_ wmirg. Falhiv AFDS huLk Initial rii' spttd `1s th Noise Abatem�it Sr2. +151s.ts otr Thlteoff roIl Rtduco Pita attiutdo ... y. Set taktoff thntst by E0 Isots -a tc maintain V2 +2{} `�� ',.�"`",�.., ,,, .'' lt2anftw airspxd , Vft fyVNAV engaged Maintain li forward prt2 w ,��, uhrattom Might, VR °. R11 "``.•. s � . „J.- -,�F - ,,4 �'.^" 3,{FUUfcetAFE Rtbactflapvan SChSttId Do tht, Aftu Taakt if e chtclatt 'ltrvst set t Manually advance thrust to Above 4M feet PA Ega,eeautothrota -, ' Sclect roll made }.. 1,,580 feet AFE or as retttrire:d by the Ddta Special Page Positive ratt of climb SdteNcrify CIE: thrust Rotraetgtar VcrrfyWAV==agc ,i Figure 1. Boeing 757 Close -In NADP Note: FOrahinnnedlate nmLaftertah off, maintain initial climb speed {virh takeoff flaps While mane Vaning. FoWK AFDS bard: ]melts. • SM takeoff thmst by 80 )amts • Monitor airspeed Maintain light fory azdpr sure Vf {_VR l • Rotate thrnit let • .Manually advance tlmtst to stabilize Engage autothrottle If the autopilot is desired,it is normally engapd after a mll mode and WAY are selected Note: t cf ccanpany climb perfi data ensures a pliatwe Mth ClassC andD aispace speed restrictions fah varg this profile. Orhami _, elhete �appropda� S[D speai resirictin�s. Initial o]Mnli ipoed Fl ul' • V2+15toV2+25lstots l c�Me 3istftTa}:eoff Figure 2. Boeing 757 Distant NADP m m C rn rn Y rn G � s. N .rn o � m o . g CD O N N 0 0 Z w y va ro 1� U t,7 r P u a J 8 p � rn A ro^ �a In the noise model, the INM Standard profile was initially used, and adjustments to the procedural steps were made. For example, for the 757PW, the steps involved in the Delta- specific Close -in NADP procedure in INM include: 1 Acceleration height {normally I,00-0 feetAF'El _Above, 400 feet RA , SelectherifyCL.E thrust • SeleM roll mode , Vft fyVNAV engaged • Retract flaps on schedule iiidw rate of olMnb • Aooeltmte to 250 lmots or F.etract J?3�az appropriate climb spe^.,d Figure 2. Boeing 757 Distant NADP m m C rn rn Y rn G � s. N .rn o � m o . g CD O N N 0 0 Z w y va ro 1� U t,7 r P u a J 8 p � rn A ro^ �a In the noise model, the INM Standard profile was initially used, and adjustments to the procedural steps were made. For example, for the 757PW, the steps involved in the Delta- specific Close -in NADP procedure in INM include: *Start takeoff roll using takeoff power and flaps (Flaps 5) ®Liftoff and climb to 1,500' AFE using takeoff power and flaps (Flaps 5) *At 1,500' AFE, reduce power to climb thrust, maintain takeoff flaps and climb to 3,000' at constant speed (Flaps 5) *At 3,000' AFE, accelerate to 190 knots at a climb rate of 1,471 fpm (Flaps T_05) *Reduce flaps and accelerate to 206 knots at a climb rate of 1,636 fpm (Flaps T_01) *Reduce flaps and accelerate to 250 knots at a climb rate of 1,822 fpm (Flaps T_00) *Retract flaps completely and climb to 10,000' AFE at 250 knots (Flaps ZERO) Steps in the INM Delta- specific Distant NADP include: *Start takeoff roll using takeoff power and flaps (Flaps 5) *Liftoff and climb to 1,000' AFE using takeoff power and flaps (Flaps 5) *Reduce power to climb thrust and accelerate to 190 knots at a climb rate of 1,471 fpm (Flaps T_05) *Reduce flaps and accelerate to 206 knots at a climb rate of 1,636 fpm (Flaps T_01) *Reduce flaps and climb to 3,000' AFE at 206 knots (Flaps T_00) *Accelerate to 250 knots at a climb rate of 1,822 fpm (Flaps T_00) *Retract flaps completely and climb to 10,000' AFE at 250 knots (Flaps ZERO) INM provides a series of altitude, speed, and thrust values used in the calculation of noise exposure. Figures 3 through 5 depict a comparison of the resulting Delta Close -in and Delta Distant NADPs for a sample aircraft (757PW). In this example, the blue line represents the Close -in NADP, while the red line represents the Distant NADP. s" Figure 3. 757PW Close -in versus Distant Airspeed These graphs, and a list of procedural steps for each aircraft type, were reviewed with Delta and were agreed to be reasonable. Once each flight profile was developed for each stage length in INM, a comparison of Sound Exposure Level (SEL) values was prepared according to guidelines set forth in Appendix B of the INM User's Guide for analyzing the development of custom profiles. Figure 6 depicts a comparison SEL contour for the 757PW, showing levels at SEL 75 dB and above. In the figure, the black lines represent the Close -in NADP, while the gray lines and fill represent the Distant NADP. Figure 4. 757PW Close -in versus Distant Altitude Figure 5. 757PW Close -in versus Distant Thrust Figure 6. Comparison of SEL Contours above 75 dB — 757PW Close -in (black lines) versus Distant (Gray Lines and Fill) In this example, the Close -in procedure provides a benefit close to the runway directly beneath the flight track; however, the thrust cutbacks at 1,500' AFE result in increased noise exposure on either side of the flight trajectory. While the 757PW shows a difference in noise exposure when comparing NADPs, other aircraft show less variation or benefit, and the cumulative impact on a DNL noise contour depends on the types and frequency of the way each aircraft flies the procedure. Creation of Non -Delta NADP Profiles Following a methodology identified in the Draft November 2004 MSP Part 150 Update document, a series of Close -in and Distant profiles were developed for non -Delta aircraft operating at MSP. These Close -In NADP profiles are generally similar to those developed for Delta, but differ in that the reduction to a climb thrust setting generally occurs at 1,000' AFE rather than 1,500' AFE. Non -Delta Distant NADP profiles differ from the Delta Distant NADP profiles in that, for certain aircraft, takeoff thrust may be maintained as the aircraft climbs and accelerates through an altitude greater than 1,000' AFE. Also, the acceleration height (height at which the aircraft lowers the nose and begins accelerating) is greater than 1,000' for some aircraft types. Moreover, takeoff thrust may be maintained for a longer duration than in the Delta Distant NADP profiles. Generic non -Delta flight profiles were created for 20 aircraft in total and for multiple stage lengths. Change from Initial Custom Profiles The profiles developed and discussed in this memorandum represent a correction and refinement of previously prepared flight profiles, and include the development of an additional set of Non -Delta Close -in and Distant profiles. For Delta- specific Close -In NADP procedural profiles, the changes generally follow a similar pattern for all aircraft: ,Change the final altitude of the initial climb step (immediately after the takeoff roll) to the appropriate altitude (information provided by Delta includes altitudes of 1,500' or 1,000' AFE, depending on aircraft). •Change all thrust settings following the initial 1,500' AFE (or 1,000' AFE, depending on aircraft) climb from takeoff to climb thrust. Move the climb to 3,000' AFE step to directly after the 1,500' AFE (or 1,000' AFE, depending on aircraft) climb, and maintain the same flap setting. For Distant procedural profiles, the changes include: �w Change the final altitude of the initial climb step to 1,000' AFE. ®Change all thrust settings following the initial 1,000' AFE climb from takeoff to climb thrust, if not already set to climb thrust in the standard profile. Primarily, for the Close -In NADPs, the acceleration and thrust reduction heights were universally 800' AFE for the initial profiles. For the revised Delta Close -In NADP profiles, the acceleration and thrust reduction heights are 1,500' AFE (or 1,000' AFE for a small number of Airbus aircraft). The result in these changes is a quicker climb for the revised Delta Close -In profiles to 3,000' AFE, but a longer duration of takeoff thrust. (The climb from 800' to 1,500' was previously accomplished at climb thrust, and in the revised Delta profiles takeoff thrust is used.) For the revised Delta Distant NADP profiles, the acceleration height is 1,000' AFE. The initial Distant NADP profiles varied in their thrust reduction heights, as thrust was reduced to climb thrust only once the flaps were retracted fully, which varies by aircraft as they have different flap schedules. The revised Delta Distant NADP profiles have a thrust reduction height of 1,000' AFE (same as the acceleration height). The result is that the revised Delta Distant profiles generally have a lower altitude than the initial profiles beyond 2.5 nautical miles of the start of the takeoff roll. The initial Distant profiles maintained takeoff thrust longer (for most aircraft) than the revised Delta Distant profiles because the initial Distant profiles did not reduce to climb thrust until flaps were retracted. From a noise perspective, generally, the Close -In SEL contours are shorter directly underneath the flight track but wider to the side. The most notable changes are that the Close -In profiles do not cut back on thrust until 1,500' (versus 800 in previous), and that the Distant profiles reduce thrust at 1,000' (versus holding higher thrust until flaps were fully retracted). These have the largest impact on noise levels close in to the runway. Both changes impact noise levels at less than 2 nm from the start of the takeoff roll. NADP Impact Analysis Figure 7 provides a map comparing the Distant and Close -In noise impacts in the context of the 2011 actual noise contour. Below is a table comparing the 2011 noise contour acreages for the two procedures. Comparison of Noise Abatement Departure Profile Contour Acreage in the Context of the 2011 Actual Noise Contour 60 -64 65 -69 70 -74 75+ Total Distant NADP 5,733.5 2,459.8 808.8 578.8 9,580.8 Close -In NADP 5,927.1 2,476.2 820.8 581.1 9,805.2 The area between the 60 to 64 DNL noise contours is 193.5 acres smaller when comparing the Distant to the Close -In procedures. The area in the 65+ DNL noise contours also decreases by 30.7 acres when comparing the Distant to the Close -In procedures. The total acreage for the Distant NADP 60+ DNL noise contours is 224.4 acres smaller than the Close -In NADP 60+ DNL noise contours. The tables below provide an analysis of the single- and multi - family (greater than one unit) dwelling and population counts for the Distant and Close -In NADPs based on the parcel intersect methodology. M Val lh-j , nx t f l, ... ... C3 .... . ..... ....... . ... ILL I ""� t j ; a y { �`€ a/ a 4 i €m i w'� i � ,� «<. z,'^, . '£r' 7 ., `� ,,,ma , ..-a� � .„�� ._. <T- t -" £ 'f :fir r � 1 R. N t� ....... .... tz, k a P*m i L7 iA 4- 10 sc . . . ............ .......... 71 . .... . ..... .. �-4-4 2011 Actual Noise Contour Close -In NADP Parcel Intersect Single - Family 2011 Actual Noise Contour Close -In NADP Parcel Intersect Multi - Family ( >1 Units) 60 -64 65 -69 70 -74 75+ Total Units 5802.0 814.0 7.0 0.0 6623.0 Minneapolis Population 14795.1 2075.7 17.9 0.0 16888.7 Units 6.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 7.0 Bloomington Population 15.3 2.6 0.0 0.0 17.9 Units 533.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 533.0 Richfield Population 1391.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 1391.1 Units 132.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 132.0 Eagan Population 370.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 370.9 Units 8.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 9.0 Mendota Heights Population 21.9 2.7 0.0 0.0 24.7 Units 6481.0 816.0 7.0 0.0 7304.0 All Cities Population 16594.4 2081.0 17.9 0.0 18693.2 2011 Actual Noise Contour Close -In NADP Parcel Intersect Multi - Family ( >1 Units) , 60 -64 65 -69 70 -74 75+ Total Units 1282.0 404.0 4.0 0.0 1690.0 Minneapolis Population 2602.4 701.2 9.4 0.0 3313.0 Units 654.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 656.0 Bloomington Population 1052.9 3.6 0.0 0.0 1056.6 Units 69.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 69.0 Richfield Population 116.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 116.0 Units 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Eagan Population 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Units 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Mendota Heights Population 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Units 2005.0 406.0 4.0 0.0 2415.0 All Cities Population 3771.4 704.8 9.4 0.0 4485.6 , 2011 Actual Noise Contour Distant NADP Parcel Intersect Single - Family Distant NADP Parcel Intersect Multi - Family ( >1 Units) 60 -64 65 -69 70 -74 75+ Total Units 5447.0 855.0 2.0 0.0 6304.0 Minneapolis Population 13889.9 2180.3 5.1 0,0 16075.2 Units 11.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 12.0 Bloomington Population 28.1 2.6 0.0 0.0 30.6 Units 493.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 494.0 Richfield Population 1286.7 2.6 0.0 0.0 1289.3 Units 122.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 122.0 Eagan Population 342.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 342.8 Units 8.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 9.0 Mendota Heights Population 21.9 2.7 0.0 0.0 24.7 Units 6081.0 858.0 2.0 0.0 6941.0 All Cities Population 15569.4 2188.2 5.1 0.0 17762.6 Distant NADP Parcel Intersect Multi - Family ( >1 Units) The following tables provide the changes to the above counts with use of the Close -In NADP. F� MW 60 -64 65 -69 70 -74 75+ Total Units 1342.0 300.0 4.0 0.0 1646.0 Minneapolis Population 2673.4 526.9 9.4 0.0 .3209.6 Units 618.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 620.0 Bloomington Population 995.0 3.6 0.0 0.0 998.6 Units 54.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 54.0 Richfield Population 89.6 0.0 0:0 0.0 89.6 Units 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Eagan Population 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Units 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Mendota Heights Population 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Units 2014.0 302.0 4.0 0.0 2320.0 All Cities Population 3758.0 530.5 9.4 0.0 4297.9 The following tables provide the changes to the above counts with use of the Close -In NADP. F� MW 2011 Actual Noise Contour Distant v. Close -in Change Parcel Intersect Single - Family 2011 Actual Noise Contour Distant v. Close -In Change Parcel Intersect Multi - Family ( >1 Units) 60 -64 65 -69 70 -74 75+ Total Units -355.0 41.0 -5.0 0.0 -319.0 Minneapolis Population -905.3 104.6 -12.8 0.0 -813.5 Units 5.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 5.0 Bloomington Population 12.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 12.8 Units -40.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 -39.0 Richfield Population -104.4 2.6 0.0 0.0 -101.8 Units -10.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 -10.0 Eagan Population -28.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 -28.1 Units 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Mendota Heights Population 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Units -400.0 42.0 -5.0 0.0 -363.0 All Cities Population - 1025.0 107.2 -12.8 0.0 -930.6 2011 Actual Noise Contour Distant v. Close -In Change Parcel Intersect Multi - Family ( >1 Units) As shown above, when evaluating the 60 - 64 DNL noise contour area, the Distant NADP provides a reduction of 391 residential units (population reduction of 1038.4) when compared to the Close -In NADP. Additionally, the number of residential units decreases by 67 (population decrease of 79.9) in the 65+ DNL when comparing the Distant NADP to the Close -In NADP. All of the units within the Distant NADP 63+ DNL noise contour have been provided the 5 dB noise mitigation package. Figures 8 through 11 provide the DNL values for the two procedures on a parcel -by- parcel basis for all of the properties included in the noise mitigation program around MSP. In addition, Figures 12 and 13 provide the DNL values for the two procedures at each of the MAC Noise and Operations Monitoring System Remote Monitoring Tower locations. 4 60 -64 65 -69 70 -74 75+ Total Units 60.0 -104.0 0.0 0.0 -44.0 Minneapolis Population 70.9 -174.3 0.0 0.0 -103.4 Units -36.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 -36.0 Bloomington Population -58.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 -58.0 Units -15.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 -15.0 Richfield Population -26.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 -26.3 Units 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Eagan Population 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Units 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Mendota Heights Population 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Units 9.0 -104.0 0.0 0.0 -95.0 All Cities Population -13.4 -174.3 0.0 0.0 -187.7 As shown above, when evaluating the 60 - 64 DNL noise contour area, the Distant NADP provides a reduction of 391 residential units (population reduction of 1038.4) when compared to the Close -In NADP. Additionally, the number of residential units decreases by 67 (population decrease of 79.9) in the 65+ DNL when comparing the Distant NADP to the Close -In NADP. All of the units within the Distant NADP 63+ DNL noise contour have been provided the 5 dB noise mitigation package. Figures 8 through 11 provide the DNL values for the two procedures on a parcel -by- parcel basis for all of the properties included in the noise mitigation program around MSP. In addition, Figures 12 and 13 provide the DNL values for the two procedures at each of the MAC Noise and Operations Monitoring System Remote Monitoring Tower locations. 4 CA q p � p �nll C m C M INWI v1 fe1M y��11WW {( L �IYI� a «ww iAe4 bMw �y/Y i W I tA a a a«� C � r ` 1 cn \ 3 B ' ILL .�. -.%gy iz 4✓ Q ' 2 rn G � v 1 } \ 3 iz ' 2 rn G � v 1 AV \ iz r Z3 F x j .>+ ' 2 rn G � v 1 a '. } � ._s,.µ „w.�«,m � .`'°, ".� `8 _ .,,>„✓•..�,.,x^'� ?31 ° �h- kf 4 C .L � �3,«ti. � Dull € z 1 F1 : µv "t ; € I ka.y ....�.. ✓✓✓�>hnn �. "*,,,,�; sfY - C P €�„>_ Gi1_ ^" -°? rn t-J `S LJ Kn ai n 4 12 2 fk 7 f f ; k E33 II p c U ` c ,.• c �' 777 to t 1 P 3 s t n 1 vii t y « d sg �4 try '"`� - �� • ,r ,� .� �„ ro � r° eb zsy' v v Qk 4 Ln Ln te tT5 zy s """`i Q7.: Cdt UJ s i co � _ .e.. «. CE fi to w ll Vi t y € t- ELJ 117 C v s ko Ch cl m ppq� M F .n tee~ a Cl. — v y a € w e v v a 0 r - � � �,?,.«>,�,,.,n,= .«.,..,� . -..mss, - «• «�..,,.,,. �...5.,..,.'},....... � 3 ^ _ _ i . s 19 r E OD 1 CL p _ wj Gl IZ Ln ON (1 J. he .C' 1 N air r ..� _ 0'- v i yy,, � >� .v: t. I �' a „r.;. £ "`��.. t i ..,' a"" „, .£.1' � � � {. tit t.� t. .M .. F '�� _ ... ... s'"` q - .s Ln rl 4+ {'E'i,. CT "I",..: }°� S. A W ,�{"• f �' t/s .r 7 £ f i ..n.m e..- Qj t o kr C 1,/ yy � � P '�,.; =:. rat � .v'£�.� '°� �'.... •< � � � La. � ��•� � u`i- M p sx r F S a U L 1 wrim b jj v X IN J_ r Q. m .,. L Z JH I " t -. d y ...^ -^.. ? t 1, O C) �. xN I �� f � •� � ) �J E51 to 4 Ln s! c ((yy [ tt ... - r E OD 1 CL p _ wj Gl IZ Ln ON (1 J. he .C' 1 N air r ..� _ 0'- v i yy,, � >� .v: t. I �' a „r.;. £ "`��.. t i ..,' a"" „, .£.1' � � � {. tit t.� t. .M .. F '�� _ ... ... s'"` q - .s Ln rl 4+ {'E'i,. CT "I",..: }°� S. A W ,�{"• f �' t/s .r 7 £ f i ..n.m e..- Qj t o kr C 1,/ yy � � P '�,.; =:. rat � .v'£�.� '°� �'.... •< � � � La. � ��•� � u`i- M p sx r F S a U L 1 wrim b jj v X IN J_ r Q. m .,. L Z JH I " t -. d y ...^ -^.. ? t 1, O C) Based on these analyses, the Distant NADP provides for the widest extent of noise reduction when considered in combination with the achievements of the residential noise mitigation program at MSP. This conclusion is based on the fact that of the 802 total residential blocks included in the current 60+ DNL noise mitigation program around MSP, 79.9% receive a noise reduction as a result of the Distant NADP. Specifically, 641 residential blocks receive a benefit from use of the Distant NADP with values lower than the Close -In NADP ranging from 1.1 dB to 0.1 dB with an average of 0.6 dB. The range of noise benefit from the Close -In NADP is from 0.4 to 0.1 with an average of 0.3. Moreover, the areas impacted at a 60+ DNL where the noise is slightly increased due to the use of the Distant NADP have been provided noise mitigation. Lastly, the RMT location INM DNL evaluation establishes that, in areas located outside the current 60+ DNL noise mitigation program around MSP, the Distant NADP procedure provides a noise reduction benefit. The above findings are consistent with the analysis conducted in 2003 by the NOC which led to the decision to implement the Distant NADP on Runways 30L and 30R. Committee Action Determine if a change to the Close -In NADP is warranted on the runways at MSP. AIRPORT RELATIONS COMMISSION 2012 -2013 STAFF CONTACT: Dianne .Miller, Assistant City Administrator Name Original Appointment Term Expires Curtis Aljets April 2005 April 2013 Steve Beseke April 2006 April 2013 Daniel Johnson April 2009 April 2013 Charles Thorkildson April 2009 April 2013 Chad Stambaugh April 2008 April 2014 Carol Whisnant April 2008 April 2014 Scott Johnson May 2012 April 2014 Meetings: Second Tuesday of every other the month at 7:00 p.m. (odd months —Jan, March, May, July, Sep., Nov.) MEMORANDUM ITEM TO: MSP Noise Oversight Committee (NOC) FROM: Chad E. Legve, Manager — Noise, Environment and Planning SUBJECT: RUNWAY 17 WESTBOUND RNAV RIVER DEPARTURE PROCEDURE IMPLEMENTATION UPDATE DATE: June 27, 2012 Since early 2007 the Noise Oversight Committee (NOC) has been actively involved in the analysis and development of Performance -Based Navigation Procedures in the form of Area Navigation (RNAV) Standard Instrument Departure (SID) procedures to enhance existing noise abatement procedures and explore new noise reducing procedures. One of the earliest results of this initiative was the HSTIN ONE and SLAYR ONE RNAV SIDs off Runway 17. These procedures attempt to minimize the noise impact to communities located south and southwest of the airport adjacent to the Minnesota River Valley by focusing westbound departure operations over the unpopulated river valley as depicted on the attached map. Although many of the early NOC RNAV procedure designs and concepts were incorporated into the current FAA airspace -wide PBN development and implementation initiative at MSP, the HSTIN ONE and SLAYR ONE RNAV departure procedures were maintained as separate actions that have moved forward independent of the current airspace -wide PBN initiative. The HSTIN ONE and SLAYR ONE RNAV SIDs were designed as "off -the- ground" SIDs. Participating aircraft will be issued standard IFR clearances that include the HSTIN ONE SID or SLAYR ONE SID. When cleared for takeoff the pilot will follow precise lateral routes and altitude restrictions as the aircraft climbs. These SID designs keep Runway 17 departures on routes southwest of MSP over the center of the Minnesota River. The HSTIN ONE and SLAYR ONE RNAV SIDs will be published on July 26, 2012 and are limited only to departures from Runway 17. Due to a national procedural change effective on August 15 ", the actual local implementation of the HSTIN ONE and SLAYR ONE RNAV SIDs will be delayed until that date. The August 15, 2012 implementation of these RNAV SIDs at MSP is a significant event representing the first time that "off- the - ground" RNAV SIDs have been in use at the airport. Staff will provide an update on this topic at the July 11, 2012 NOC meeting. Afthl- City of Eagan 2011 -2012 Eagan Airport Relations Commission (ARC) Work Plan Work Plan Topic Presenters/Invited Schedule (tentative) Guests 1. Review 2010 -2011 Work Plan with Eagan City Council September 13, 2011 Special CC Mtg, 5:30 p.m. 2. Air Traffic Control Tower Tour Carl Rydeen, FAA September 13, 2011, 7 p.m. • Review of RNAV implementation process and timeline ATCT Tower Manager 3. Next Generation Initiatives and Proposed RNAV Tracks Chad Leqve, MAC November 8, 2011 ARC (moved to January when FAA releases tracks) Manager, Noise Office meeting— POSTPONED to • Noise impact on Eagan's residential areas March 13, 2012 ARC • Impact of changes on noise contours FAA Representative meeting • Economic impact of RNAV to airlines and MSP 4. Metropolitan Airports Commission Overview and Tammy Mencel, MAC November 8, 2011 ARC Introduction of Commissioner Mencel Commissioner meeting • Invite Tammy Mencel, newly appointed MAC Commission, to introduce herself to the ARC Chad Leqve, MAC • Receive overview of MAC's Pilot Education Campaign (for noise mitigation) John Nelson, MAC • Receive noise mitigation program update Noise Mitigation Prog. 5. Town Hall Meeting Chad Leqve, MAC March 15, 2012 (Eagan • Hold ARC town hall meeting in a specific neighborhood Fire Safety Center) (at neighborhood church or school) to continue success Tammy Mencel, MAC of 2010 and 2011 town hall format —send postcards to Commissioner *hold on a non - Council residents in area inviting them to the meeting meeting Tuesday to allow • Invite City Councilmembers to be present to give Eagan City Council opening statement /welcome regarding efforts taken by Councilmember(s) attendance /participation the City to combat airport noise and tell story of economic impact of MSP to Eagan Eagan's Legislative • Provide airport noise survey link on invitation (and have Delegation hard copies of survey at the open house) • Invite Chad Leqve to provide update on Next Gen initiatives / RNAV, new MAC website capabilities, and forecasted operations for the specific neighborhood invited to the meeting • Invite MAC Commissioner Tammy Mencel to give update on MSP, including ongoing merger impacts, Southwest presence, operation projections, etc. • Invite Eagan's legislative delegation to be present 6. Joint meeting with Mendota Heights' and Inver Grove Mendota Heights' and May 8, 2012 ARC meeting Heights' Airport Relations Commissions Inver Grove Heights' • Discuss respective cities' airport noise policy issues ARC 7. Noise Monitoring and Communication Review at monthly ARC • Monthly review of MAC technical reports, including meetings Corridor compliance • Ongoing discussion about communication initiatives via Experience Eagan, City website, and cable TV 8. Future ARC Items TBD • Participate in a future aviation disaster exercise put on by the MAC in conjunction with surrounding cities and agencies • Showcase Eagan booth (2013) \10 �