Loading...
8-13-12 Workshop Packet (2)ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENT ADVISORY COMMISSION WORKSHOP VIII. ROUNDTABLE IX. ADJOURNMENT AGENDA MONDAY, AUGUST 13, 2012 7:00 P.M. CONFERENCE ROOMS 2 A & B I. CALL TO ORDER II. ADOPTION OF AGENDA III. VISITORS TO BE HEARD IV. REVIEW MEETING NOTES OF JUNE 12, 2012 AND MODIFY AS NEEDED V. DEVELOP WORK PLAN VI. SUBCOMMITTEE UPDATES A. Committee Updates /Reports a. PACE /Funding for Renewable Energy and Energy Efficiency (Ross) b. Ordinances Related to Renewable Energy (Amir) VII. STAFF UPDATES A. GreenStep City Step Three B. Compost /Recycling Project at ECC and Market Fest C. Recycling during Pavilion Rentals D. Electronics Recycling at ECC — August 25 E. Playground Donation TO: THE ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENT ADVISORY COMMISSION (EEAC) FROM: JULI SEYDELL JOHNSON, DIRECTOR OF PARKS AND RECREATION DATE: JULY 9, 2012 SUBJECT: ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENT ADVISORY COMMISSION WORKSHOP AUGUST 13, 2012 A workshop of the Energy and Environment Advisory Commission (EEAC) will take place on Monday, August 13 at 7:00 p.m. in Conference Rooms 2 A &B. Please contact Juli Seydell Johnson at 651- 675 -5006 or isjohnson @cityofeagan.com if you are unable to attend this meeting. I. CALL TO ORDER City of' EaQall Nano II. ADOPTION OF THE AGENDA The agenda, as presented or modified, is in order for adoption by the Commission. III. VISITORS TO BE HEARD Should there be any members of the public that wish to address the Commission at this workshop setting this would be the opportunity for them to comment. Staff is not aware that there will be any public participation. IV. REVIEW MEETING NOTES OF JUNE 12, 2012 The notes of the June 12, 2012 meeting are enclosed on Pages 5 -7. The Commission should review and make any modifications to correctly reflect the meeting notes. V. DEVELOP WORK PLAN The primary purpose of the workshop is for the EEAC to discuss and develop their 2012/2013 work plan for consideration and direction from the City Council. Member Nadav has provided the following links for additional information as the EEAC work plan development discussion continues about partnering with the city's water utility on a water efficiency program. Copies of this information are enclosed on Pages 8 -27: • Metropolitan Council Water Conservation Toolbox (Pg 8 -10) http : / /www.metrocouncil.org/ environment / WaterSupply /conservationtoolbox programs.htm • Eagan 2013 - 2017 CIP pages 9 - 11: (Pg 11 -13) http: / /www.cityofeagan. comJpload/ images /PublicWorks /Eng /CIPMemo.pdf • Eagan Public Works Annual Report Utilities Division Appendix pages 1 - 2 (labelled UA -64 and UA -65): http: / /www.cityofeagan.com/ upload / images /PublicWorks /Eng /ARUA.pdf (Pg14 -15) • EPA Report, "Cases in Water Conservation" title page and the introduction and the summary tables (labelled pages 2 - 6): http: / /www.epa.gov /watersense /does /utilityconservation 5 08 ,pdf (Pg 16 -20) • EPA WaterSense About Us: http: / /www .epa.g_ov/ watersense /aboutus /index.html (Pages 21 -27) • EPA WaterSense Facts www.epa.gov /watersense /about_us /facts.html • EPA WaterSense Partnership Agreement for Local Governments http: / /www.epa.gov /watersense /does /partnership promopartners508.pdf VI. SUBCOMMITTEE UPDATES 1. PACE /Funding Mechanisms for Renewable Energy and Energy Efficiency (Ross) A memo is included on Pages 28 -30 ,outlining the Committee's recent work and potential request for Council consideration. The Committee will also provide a verbal update. 2. Review of City Ordinances Related to Renewable Energy (Amir) A memo is included on Pages 31 -37 outlining the Committee's recent work. The Committee will also provide a verbal update. VII. STAFF UPDATES 1. GreenStep Cities The City was recently recognized for achieving Step Three of GreenStep Cities initiative thanks to the hard work and dedication of the Energy and Environment Commission. The notice reflecting this benchmark is included on Pages 38 -39. 2. Composting /Recycling Initiative at ECC and Market Fest The Commission was advised of a composting program that was implemented at the Eagan Community Center thanks to the recommendation by the EEAC and approval by the City Council to reallocate recycling funds to fund this trial program. The composting program was launched in July and will end with a final waste sort that will occur in late August after which a report of findings will be shared with the Commission and Council. The composting project was expanded to also include Market Fest a week after the program was started at ECC. To date the results have been very successful and have caught the attention of the Region 5 EPA folks. The program trial will conclude with a presentation on September 12 which will be hosted at the ECC in which event venues in the metro area will be invited to learn more about this program. Representatives of EPA, MNTap and City staff will be available to talk about the value of a composting/recycling initiative and answer questions from the participants. The Mayor has been invited to welcome guests and EEAC members will be invited to attend the 8 am — noon event. The City will also be participating in the EPA's Food Recovery Challenge which is a new initiative under the Sustainable Materials Management Program where participants commit to reducing food waste reaching landfills through prevention, donation, composting and /or anaerobic digestion many of which are currently underway with the current composting initiative. An information flyer is included on Pages 40 -41. 3. Recycling during Park Pavilion Rentals Staff has expanded recycling efforts by including recycling opportunities during park pavilion rentals. Generally these gatherings have larger groups and staff is working to educate guests about separating plastic and cans from true trash in an effort to reduce the overall trash from these sites. 4. Electronics Recycling Drop - Off at ECC — August 25 Tech Dump is hosting a free electronics drop -off at the Eagan Community Center where individuals can recycle their computers, cell phones, wires, printers, dvd players and more. Broken, obsolete and working items will be accepted and a $10 donation is being suggested for CRT monitors and TV's. The event will begin at 9 a.m. and end at 1 p.m. in the upper parking lot of the community center. A flyer of the event is included on Page 42. 5. Playground Donation Parks staff plans to partner with the non - profit group Kids Around the World (KAW) this fall to allow playground equipment that is being removed from our parks to be recycled and reused in a developing country. United States playground design standards are constantly evolving and changing in an effort to make playgrounds safer for the children that use them. Hence, once a playground has been pulled from the ground it must be compliant with the current design standards, versus the standards that were in place at the time of the original installation. The updated safety standards almost always preclude the reuse of a playground structure, at least in the United States. Most removed playground equipment in the United States ends up in landfills. Kids Around the World (KAW) is non - profit organization that coordinates the recycling of playground structures for use in developing countries around the world. In the past two years KAW has shipped nearly 140 playgrounds to every part of the globe. Seventeen have come from the Twin Cities area including the cities of Plymouth, Eden Prairie and St Louis Park. KAW coordinates and funds transportation to the global destinations, their volunteer members are also available to assist with the initial removal and sorting. KAW mobilizes volunteers at the destination point to reinstall the structure and give it a new life. Upon the initial removal, the structure is donated to KAW to close the ownership loop. There is no cost to the host agency. This fall the playground structure at Wescott Commons Park is scheduled for replacement. KAW staff have visited the Wescott site and expressed an interest in recycling the structure to a global destination yet to be determined. VIII. ROUNDTABLE The Roundtable is scheduled as an opportunity for Commissioners to ask questions, make requests for future agenda items, or provide informative updates to the Commission pertaining to energy and environment initiatives. IX. ADJOURNMENT /s /Juli Seydell Johnson Director of Parks and Recreation MEETING NOTES OF THE EAGAN ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENT ADVISORY COMMISSION WORKSHOP JUNE 12, 2012 A workshop of the Eagan Energy and Environment Advisory Commission was held on Tuesday, June 12, 2012 at 7:00 p.m. Those present were Amir Nadav, Jeff LeClair, Jon Drucker, Kari Palmer, Michael Wisniewski, Ross Bintner and Tim Harder. Also present was Parks and Recreation Director Juli Seydell Johnson and Amy Grannes, Office Supervisor. COMMISSION ORGANIZATION ELECTION OF OFFICERS Following a brief discussion of the roles of Chair, Vice Chair and Secretary, the nominations were opened for the various positions. • Palmer moved, Harder seconded with all present members voting unanimously to elect Jeff LeClair as Chair. • LeClair moved, Drucker seconded with all present members voting unanimously to elect Kari Palmer as Vice Chair. • Bintner moved, Nadav seconded with all present members voting unanimously to elect Ross Bintner as Secretary. • Monday, August 13: • Tuesday, August 21: • Tuesday, September 11: • Tuesday, September 11: • Tuesday, October 9: • Tuesday, December 11: • Tuesday, February 12: • Tuesday, April 9: MEETING DATES Drucker moved, Harder seconded with all present members voting unanimously to set the following dates for the 2012 -13 EEAC meetings: 7 p.m. - workshop only 7 p.m. - workshop only (if needed) 5:30 p.m. - City Council workshop 7 p.m. - regular EEAC meeting 7 p.m. - regular EEAC meeting 7 p.m. - regular EEAC meeting 7 p.rn. - regular EEAC meeting 7 p.m. - regular EEAC meeting MEETING NOTIFICATIONS AND PACKETS Following the introduction of this item and subsequent discussion the EEAC made the following decisions about meeting notifications and packets: • Outlook meeting notices will be sent by City Staff prior to each workshop and meeting. • Packets less than 20 pages will be e- mailed and /or made available via link. • Packets over 20 pages will be printed and delivered to Commission Members' homes. Energy and Environment Commission Workshop Notes June 12, 2012 Page 2 of 3 SUBCOMMITTEES There was discussion about the current standing subcommittees and it was determined that the following subcommittees will continue to meet and work on items from the previous work plan until a new work plan is approved by the City Council: • Ordinance Review Subcommittee Members serving on the subcommittee: Nadav (lead), Wisniewski and Drucker • Communication Subcommittee Members serving on the subcommittee: Palmer (lead), Nadav and Drucker • PACE Subcommittee Members serving on the subcommittee: Bintner (lead), Nadav and Harder o Subcommittees will notify City Staff Liaison in advance of all meetings. Staff liaison will attend, when schedule allows. o Subcommittee materials to be discussed or presented at an EEAC meeting must be sent to the City Staff Liaison at least 10 days prior to the meeting in order to be included in the packet. Open meeting laws were also reviewed and it was clarified that all e -mail communication pertaining to the EEAC needs to go through the City Staff Liaison. WORK PLAN Commission Members reviewed and discussed the current goals and work plan. This work will continue at the August 13 and 21 workshops with a review of past meeting minutes and current status with Minnesota GreenStep Cities program. After further discussion several topics were mentioned by Commission Members as possible additions for the 2012 -13 work plan. Those topics, in no particular order of priority included: • Ordinances /regulations concerning wood burning and wood heaters for homes. (Palmer) • Preventing the use of coal tar sealant for driveways and parking lots and the public education needed to bring awareness to residents and businesses. (Palmer) • Monitoring /controlling emissions from diesel generators and the public education needed to bring awareness to residents and businesses. (Palmer) • Review Ordinances and recommend changes to better support and promote best practices from Minnesota GreenStep Cities program. (Palmer) • Review of Water Conservation Ordinances and Practices. (Bintner) • Continue PACE efforts. (LeClair and Bintner) • "Greening" of City fleet — analysis and recommendation. (Bintner) • Public education concerning sustainability indicators. (What do they mean and how do we use them ?) (Bintner • Street Sweeping — How often is it done in Eagan? Should it be done more often? (Bintner) • Winter Street Maintenance — Salt use; effects on lakes, best practice review and recommendations. (Bintner) Energy and Enviromnent Commission Workshop Notes June 12, 2012 Page 3 of 3 • Rain Garden Update 9. (LeClair) • Home and Leisure Show /Showcase Eagan —Could these events have an environmental focus? (Nadav) e Compost Bins and Rain Barrels — Subsidy and /or education programs. (Wisniewski) • Additional communication to community The meeting concluded at 9:00 p.m. ADJOURNMENT DATE SECRETARY 7. Water conservation toolbox: programs for water suppliers - Metropolitan Council Page 1 of 3 M Council > Wastewater +Water > Water Supply Planning Water Conservation Toolbox: Programs for Water Suppliers Water utilities across North America save considerable amounts of water through water - efficiency programs. Climate and water availability typically drive the aggressiveness of communities' water conservation programs, with more substantial efforts being made in the southwestern states and Florida. Although these areas may have more significant shortages and more aggressive water use reduction programs, the conservation principles applied there are applicable to all areas regardless of the climate. The Colorado Water Conservation Board and Aquacraft, Inc. published the Guidebook of Best Practices for Municipal Conservation in Colorado in 2010. Evaluating Water Conservation Programs There are several benefits and challenges to the implementation of water conservation programs. Benefits and costs of water conservation. The following tools have been developed to assist in the evaluation and selection of water conservation programs. * *NOTE: You need to maximize the workbook once you open it in order to utilize the features of these documents. By maximizing the workbook, you will be able to see the tabs at the bottom. • Water Conservation Cost Benefit Assessment Tool • Water Conservation Program Prioritization Tool • Water Conservation Rate Structure Evaluation Tool If you have questions or comments on these tools or any of the information provided in this toolbox please contact us by email at watersupply ©metc.state.mn.us or by telephone at 651 602 -1000. Implementing a combination of programs tailored to your community's needs is the most effective way of reducing water use. To assist you in selecting water conservation programs, this Toolbox provides information in the following areas: • Regulatory Programs • Incentive Programs • Education Programs • Rate Structures • Stormwater reuse See water conservation programs in use today throughout the metropolitan area, Regulatory Programs 1. Soil preparation requirements • Tips and Practices, Metropolitan Council • Building Regulations: Lawn Requirements, Andover, MN • Subdivision Code: Topsoil and Sodding, Prior Lake, MN • Model Erosion and Sediment Control Ordinance, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency • Erosion and Sediment Control Ordinance, City of Minneapolis, MN 2. Watering restrictions • Tips and Practices, Metropolitan Council • Watering Restrictions, City of Victoria, MN • Watering Restrictions, City of Plymouth, MN • Watering Policy, City of Woodbury, MN • Rain sensor, model ordinance http:// www .metrocouncil.org /enviromnent/ WaterSupply /conservationtoolbox programs.htm 8/8/2012 Water conservation toolbox: programs for water suppliers - Metropolitan Council Page 2 of 3 • Water Wasting Lawn Irrigation, model ordinance 3. Landscaping requirements • Tips and Practices, Metropolitan Council • Model Municipal Ordinance Encouraging the Use of Native Plant Communities as an Alternative in Urban Landscape Design, Wild Ones • Water Efficient Irrigation and Landscape Ordinance, City of Tampa Bay, FL • A Guide to Developing a Community Tree Preservation Ordinance, Minnesota Shade Tree Advisory Committee • Limitations on Water Use for Landscaping In New Developments and Landscaping Renovations, San Francisco, CA • Tree Ratio, model ordinance • Model Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance, California 4. Water using fixture retrofit • Tips and Practices, Metropolitan Council • Model Water Using Fixture Retrofit Ordinance, City of San Diego, CA • Retrofit Upon Sale Ordinance, City of San Luis Obispo, CA • Retrofit Upon Sale Ordinance, City of Santa Monica, CA 5. Other Regulatory Programs • Model Ordinances to Protect Local Resources, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency • Water Conservation Ordinances, City of Tucson, AZ (Back to top) Incentive Programs Incentive programs can effectively encourage behavioral changes. For instance, a resident might be more apt to plant a garden with native plants or change a toilet if the materials are discounted. 1. Landscape rebates • Tips and Practices, Metropolitan Council • Rain Garden Cost -share Program, Rice Creek Watershed District • Landscape Rebate Program, Southern Nevada Water Authority 2. Water using fixture and /or appliance rebates • Tips and Practices, Metropolitan Council • Appliance Rebate Program, City of Eden Prairie, MN • Water Management Rebate Program Model, Southwest Florida • Toilet and Washing Machine Rebate Program, City of San Luis Obispo, CA (Back to top) Education Programs Evaluating the impact of water conservation education is difficult. However, providing conservation messages on a regular basis through a variety of approaches (bill stuffers, newsletters, press releases, school outreach) helps to ensure the messages reach a large audience. Minnesota Statute 103G.291 requires that water suppliers have an education program as part of their conservation plan. • Tips and Practices, Metropolitan Council • Water: Use it wisely • H2Ouse • WaterWiser • U.S. Environmental Protection Agency • Minnesota Native Plant Guide, MN Department of Natural Resources • Water Conservation, Elk River, MN, Municipal Utilities • Model water conservation brochure • Industrial, Commercial and Institutional Water Audits, Alburquerque Bernalillo County Water Utility Authority • Publicly Owned Treatment Works, Minnesota Technical Assistance Program, University of MN http: / /www.metrocouncil.org/ environment / WaterSupply /conservationtoolbox programs.htm 8/8/2012 Water conservation toolbox: programs for water suppliers - Metropolitan Council Page 3 of 3 (Back to top) Rate Structures Minnesota Statutes, section 103G.291, was amended in 2008 to include a requirement for public water suppliers serving more than 1,000 people to adopt a water rate structure that encourages conservation. For more information on conservation rate structures visit the Department of Natural Resources website. A residential rate structure development tool is available here to assist In the development of water conservation rate structures. Rate Structure Tool. This tool focuses on residential use and rates. Suppliers may want to establish different rate structures for commercial, industrial and institutional customer that promote conservation through higher rates for the uses that are above their normal operational needs. Stormwater Reuse Communities throughout the United States are using Stormwater as an alternative water source for irrigation. As the percent of impervious surface throughout the Twin Cities metropolitan area increases, stormwater runoff increases impacting water quality. Harvesting rainwater and using retention ponds to capture stormwater runoff for subsequent use can reduce the impacts of urban runoff, while conserving our water resources. • Retention and Irrigation, California Stormwater Quality Association • Stormwater Reuse, University of Central Florida • Stormwater as an Alternative Source of Water Supply: Feasibility and Implications for Watershed Management, University of Florida • Lawn and Landscape Irrigation Systems, Medina City Code • Stormwater Manual: Drinking Water Source Areas, Minnesota Pollution Control Agency • Stormwater calculator, Green Values (Back to top) HomelA -Z IndexlAbout UslContact UsISite MaplPolicleslMonday August 22 2011 © 2012 Metropolitan Council. All Rights Reserved. • 390 Robert St. N., St. Paul, MN 55101 • Phone: 651 - 602 -1000 . TTY: 651 - 291 -0904 /6, http: / /www.metrocouncil.org/ environment / WaterSupply /conservationtoolbox programs.htm 8/8/2012 a new signal at this intersection for access control from these properties. Further support for such access control could be warranted with the extension of a new public street south to Lone Oak Circle. MnDOT approval would be required. ($0.25M) Additional specific sites for potential signalization or other intersection control are identified under the "FUTURE" category. They can be programmed for a specific year based on traffic warrants or Council direction, subject to other jurisdictional agreement. G. Streetlights This element pertains to the installation or upgrade of streetlights at major intersections, the maintenance painting of traffic signals, and the maintenance painting of city -owned street lights (Promenade, Central Parkway, and Cedar Grove areas only). It does not include the installation or maintenance of residential neighborhood lights or continuous commercial street lighting typically associated with new developments. This program is based on an inventory of needs along our collector and arterial transportation system in a modest annual program. II. Other (Parking Lots, Signs, Noise Walls, Transit, etc) This new and expanded category addresses the variety of specialty projects that are associated with a more mature suburban community and other special funded or mandated programs. 1. Regulatory & Street Name Signs, City -wide - Sign Replacement (2014.1) Current federal regulations mandate replacement of all regulatory and street name signs that do not comply with current standards. The proposed improvement would bring the City into full compliance, but modifications to these regulations due to funding concerns may be implemented that would allow the City flexibility on the actual implementation. ($0.30M) 2. Noise Wall — East Side of 35E North of Deerwood Drive (2016.1) This Noise Wall is programmed for 2016 based upon available funding and programming by MnDOT. A public meeting will be scheduled in 2012 to present the project. The installation of this sound abatement wall would be the second one in Eagan and funded 90% by MnDOT. (City 10% = $72,500) 3. Noise Wall — West Side of 35E, Kings Road to Kettle Park (2017.1) This new Noise Wall proposal is currently programmed for 2017 by MnDOT. The installation of this sound abatement wall could be the third one in five years in Eagan and would be funded 90% by MnDOT. (City 10% = $90,000) UTILITIES A. Water Trunk Distribution This portion of the CIP has historically been somewhat development driven and based on the most current Comprehensive Water Supply and Distribution Plan. This CIP identifies various trunk watermain extensions and installations within Inver Grove Heights in accordance with our Joint Powers Agreement or as necessary to complete our master plan. At the present time, the following are the only significant installations programmed in the next 5 years: 1. Parkview Golf Course (2013.1 &2) — The extension of this trunk connection through the Parkview Golf Course between the Fairway Hills and Parkcliff - 9 - /1 Additions and the installation of a Pressure Reducing (PR) Station on Parkridge Drive will complete the Ultra High pressure zone interconnect. The schedule has been accelerated due to a current application for a Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment to single - family residential for the development of the golf course. ($0.26M) 2. Cedar Grove Redevelopment District — Water Main Relocation/Replacement (2013.3) — This improvement will address the proposed realignment of Cedar Grove Boulevard and the anticipated Paragon development, preparing for the full development of the remainder of the redevelopment area. ($0.15M) B. Water Operations & Facilities This element identifies programmed improvements for both Renewal & Replacement (R & R) and Supply, Storage & Treatment (SST) capital improvements. It programs the scheduled rotation of preventative rehab /repair of existing wells approximately every 6 -8 years depending on the well's usage and unique aquifer attributes. Some of the other significant capital improvements are: 1. SCADA Renewal /Update — City -Wide (2013.2 — 2017.2) — Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition (SCADA) is the City's computer system that monitors the water infrastructure including wells, treatment plants, water storage reservoirs, and pump stations. Currently, portions of the water system are not monitored, most equipment is more than 10 years old and hardware installations are not consistent. A 5 -year plan is proposed to place SCADA at all sites to improve system operation and monitoring while reducing staff time requirements. ($0.05M to $0.10M per year, 5 -year Total of $0.40M) 2. New Well #22 (2013.3) — The Lockheed- Martin site redevelopment appears to be progressing and construction is anticipated for 2013 -14. The Water Supply and Distribution Plan (2008) calls for a future well site within the north well field near the southeast corner of the redevelopment site. It is proposed to drill a well during the site construction to minimize the impact to the development site and surrounding businesses. ($0.50M) 3. Yankee Doodle Reservoir General Maintenance (2013.4) — The maintenance schedule for this steel tank reservoir, constructed in 1974, has been delayed one year and a mid cycle touch -up is needed to protect its condition. ($0.25M) 4. Sperry Reservoir Repainting (2014.31— This reservoir was originally constructed in the early 1960's, last painted in 1987 and is due for repainting to protect the condition of this steel tank. The updated Water Supply & Distribution Plan (2008) determined that this elevated water tank is not critical to the overall storage or pressure of the water distribution system and can be removed from service. It has been out of service for more than 6 years. However, it has been an effective communications tower /structure for several cellular antennae leases and the City /County's new 800 MHz radio system. Since the tank is out of service and dry, it is proposed the exterior be cleaned up (utility appurtenances removed) and repainted at a cost reduction of $0.13M since it will no longer hold water (i.e. dry tank). It would be maintained as a communications tower only requiring future exterior repainting. ($0.55M) 5. New Well #23 (2015.3) — Another new well is planned to be developed in the City's south well field and is programmed for 2015 based on projected - 10 - /z , consumption demands in the high pressure zone and the Cliff Road Water Treatment Plant's capacity to accommodate it. ($0.53M) 6. Southern Lakes Water Tower maintenance (2016,3) — This reservoir was constructed in 1998 and is due for general maintenance to protect the condition of this steel tower. ($0,48M) C. Sanitary Sewer — Trunk Conveyance The trunk sanitary sewer system is nearly complete with the exception of a few undeveloped areas and a possible pipe capacity resolution to accommodate increasing community flows and potential redevelopment opportunities. 1. Lone Oak Drive (Ecolab) (2016.1) — In this area the existing trunk system is undersized with insufficient capacity to handle potential future growth in the sewer district (Boulder Lakes and Ames Crossing Road). ($0.15M) 2. Mike Collins Drive and Yankee Doodle Road (Future) — A recent study of the sewer system in this location has indicated that previously anticipated capacity issues may have been overstated. Original projections for sewage generation for industrial parks such as the existing land use served by this portion of the system were over estimated and can no longer be supported by actual collected data. It is possible that future industry with higher water uses may relocate in this area, causing a need to optimize the system. ($0.90M) D. Sanitary Sewer — Facilities and Operations This includes all aspects of the sanitary collection system including 14 pumping stations and force mains, Staring in 2002, the Department started a 10 year program of a routine scheduled relining approx. 5,000 ft /yr of the older segments of the system to structurally strengthen the pipe and seal out ground water infiltration. It is proposed to continue this program due to the Inflow & Infiltration mitigation benefits received, 1. Carlson Lake Lift Station (2013.3) — The Carlson Lake lift station is one of the older lift stations in Eagan (1974). It has a variety of issues including a small easement (very limited access), failing gate valves, small wet well, and old control hardware. It is proposed to relocate the station across the street, increase the wet well capacity (lower run times and fewer starts), and have the additional room for properly placed station controls. ($0.25M) 2. SCADA Renewal /Update — City -Wide (2013.2 — 2017.3) — Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition (SCADA) is the City's computer system that monitors the sanitary sewer infrastructure including sanitary lift stations, Currently, portions of the sewer system are not monitored, most equipment is more than 10 years old and hardware installations are not consistent. A 5 -year plan is proposed to place SCADA at all sites to improve system operation and monitoring while reducing staff time requirements. ($0,05M per year, 5 -year Total of $0.25M) 3. Denmark Lift Station (2014,21 — The Demmark Lift Station was constructed in 1967. It has a variety of issues including mechanical wear, failing gate valves, small wet well, and old control hardware. It is proposed to replace the existing station with a new lift station to enhance operational efficiencies and reduce the potential risk of property damage from failure at the lift station. ($0.60M) 4, Witham Lane Lift Station (2015.2) — The Country Hollow Lift Station is one of the largest and most active sanitary lift stations in Eagan. The station handles the sewer flows from 4 separate drainage districts. It is proposed to redirect the flows from two Northfield 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007 2006 2005 2004 1 294,155 459,894 304,835 269,253 176,737 108,349 221,170 151,363 2 57,235 67,934 84.071 81,132 114,789 94,397 136,104 48,259 3 8,119 83,450 70,697 93,634 47,310 96,161 114,182 39,304 4 207,073 244,711 362,209 238,818 145,217 283,895 104,932 129,426 6 325,790 244,678 131,311 363,929 448,929 336,112 327,778 261,828 7 175,405 101,852 313,586 264,055 225,284 362,173 307,919 142,990 8 15,924 38,767 11,993 5,755 37,549 306,436 73,039 140,388 9 165,719 141,375 102,964 109,177 176,694 85,729 58,014 49,376 11 2 14,091 5,897 28,950 154,277 15,938 154,390 0 16 303,626 248,706 435,650 391,954 487,683 223,748 181,151 210,819 17 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20 358,261 219,333 265,200 463,527 258,828 547,284 58,402 21 321,054 362,804 334,709 215,387 255,424 211,001 0 Sub Total 2,232,362 2,227,595 2,423,212 2,525,571 2,528,768 2,671,223 1,737,081 1,173,753 Southfield 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007 2006 2005 2004 5 226,949 229,027 171,629 251,013 357,119 338,672 463,498 381,990 10 185,685 232,151 292,432 121,193 176,755 138,083 420,964 446,934 12 74,032 66,835 41,658 53,467 37,481 155,096 207,618 196,760 13 99,934 96,225 280,033 113,882 8,765 26,971 5,387 25,013 14 34.570 23,549 16,681 1,373 0 15,933 92,413 102,289 15 4,433 45,825 3,729 3,922 130,966 10,054 160,670 7,935 18 164,038 19,686 60,933 193,590 194,869 118,257 70,872 453,971 19 68,724 100,975 156,327 234,139 202,595 196,454 0 563,596 Sub Total 858,366 814,273 1,023,422 972,579 1,108,550 999,520 1,421,422 2,178,488 Grand Total 3,090,728 3,041,868 3,446,634 3,498,150 3,637,318 3,670,743 3,158,503 3,352,241 RAW WATER PUMPED - USAGE IN THOUSAND GALLONS/YEAR TREATMENT TOTALS IN THOUSANDS GALLONS 2011 2010 2009 , . 2008 2007 2006 2005 2004 Coachman Rd 2,399,986 2,164,479 2,180,999 2,494,938 2,458,305 2,547,099 1,737,081 1,173,753 Cliff Rd 871,790 803,154 980,968 879,021 1,061,218 849,996 1,421,422 2,178,488 Total 3,271,776 2,967,633 3,161,967 3,373,959 3,519,523 3,397,095 3,158,503 3,352,241 RAW WATER PUMPED - USAGE IN THOUSAND GALLONS/YEAR TREATMENT TOTALS IN THOUSANDS GALLONS o. E g CD ;7) ® ® 0 CD o N col T te C co CO O 10 M O CO 10 N O 10 O 10 0 0 O O O 0 O O O N O O N 0 0 N 10 0 0 N O O CO 0 0 N 0 0 O O O N rn O N 0) CO ch m co O N M co N O M M O N d' co O CO M CO CO (M 2 Introduction Introduction Water utilities across the United States and elsewhere in North America are saving substan- tial amounts of water through strategic water - efficiency programs. These savings often trans- late into capital and operating savings, which allow systems to defer or avoid significant expenditures for water supply facilities and wastewater facilities. These case studies feature the efforts and achievements of 17 water systems. These systems range in size from small to very large, and their efficiency programs incorporate a wide range of techniques for achieving various water management goals. In every case, the results are impressive. The following summary table provides an overview of the case studies, highlight- ing problems addressed, approaches taken, and results achieved. In general, water conserva- tion programs also produce many environmental benefits, including reduced energy use, reduced wastewater discharges, and protection of aquatic habitats. The incidence of water conservation and water reuse programs has increased dramatically in the last 10 years. Once associated only with the arid West, these programs have spread geo- graphically to almost all parts of the United States. In many cities, the scope of water conserva- tion programs has expanded to include not only residential customers, but commercial, institutional, and industrial customers, as well. These case studies illustrate some of the tangi- ble results achieved by water conservation programs implemented at the local level. Many of these accomplishments have broader relevance to other communities facing similar water resource management and infrastructure investment issues. EPA used secondary data sources to compile these case studies. These sources are cited in the "Resources" section at the end of each piece. In addition, contacts for each water system have reviewed and approved their case study. Because the case studies come from secondary sources, the type of information provided is not necessarily uniform or comparable, and is not intended to provide generalized results. The terms water conservation and water efficiency are used here in their broadest context, which includes water loss management, wastewater recla- mation and reuse for non - potable purposes, adoption of conservation water rates, changes to more efficient water -using equipment, and behavioral changes that reduce water use. 4) Summary of Conservation Case Studies Albuquerque, ew Mexico 1, Ashland, Oregon Gallitzin, 'Pennsylvania ;Gilbert, Arizona %ty Problem Approach A dry climate and increased population growth put a strain on Albuquerque's water supply. Accelerated population growth in the 1980s and the expiration of a critical water right created a water supply problem. Ashland's 1991 water efficiency program `consisted of four major components: system leak detection and repair, ' conservation -based water rate`s, a showerhead`;replacement program,.and toilet retrofits and replacement. Ashland's conservation efforts have resulted in water savings of approximately 395,000 gallons per day (16% of winter usage) as well as 'a reduction-in wastewater volume. Cary, With the population more than North Carolina doubling during the past 10 By the `mid- 1990s, the town of Gallitzin was experiencing high water loss, recurring leaks, low pressure, high operational costs, and unstable water entering the Gallitzin developed an accurate meter reading and system map, and a leak detection and repair program. years and high water demand during dry, hot summers, the city's water resources were seriously strained. Rapid population growth during the 1980s put a strain on the water supply of this Arizona town located in an arid climate. Albuquerque's Long -Range Water Conservation Strategy Resolution consisted of new conservation -based water rates, a public education program, a high- efficiency plumbing program; landscaping programs, and large -use programs. Cary's water conservation program consists of eight elements: public' education, landscape and irrigation codes, toilet flapper rebates, residential audits, conservation rate structure, new homes points program, landscape water budget, and a water reclamation facility. Gilbert instituted a multi- faceted water conservation program that included building code requirements, an increasing -block water rate structure, a metering' program, public education, and a low water -use landscaping program. Albuquerque's conservation program has successfully slowed the groundwater drawdown so that the level of water demand should stay constant until 2005. Peak demand is down 14% from 1990. Cary's water conservation program will reduce retail water production by an estimated 4.6 mgd by the end of 2028, a savings of approximately 16% in retail water production. These savings reduced operating costs and have already allowed Cary to delay two water plant expansions. The results of the program were dramatic. Gallitzin realized? an 87% drop in unaccounted -for water, a 59% drop in production, and considerable financial savings. Gilbert has been particularly successful reusing reclaimed water. A new wastewater reclamation plant was built, as well as several recharge ponds that serve as a riparian habitat for a diverse number of species. Summary 3 Summary of Conservation Case City k,- Goleta, California touston, exas Houston's groundwater sources have experienced increasing problems with land subsidence, saltwater intrusion, and flooding. These problems, along with a state regulation to reduce . groundwater use, led Houston to explore methods for managing groundwater supplies. Houston implemented a comprehensive conservation program that included an education program, plumbing retrofits, audits, leak detection and repair, an increasing- block rate structure, and conservation planning. The dramatic success of pilot programs has led Houston to predict a 7.3 % reduction in water demand by 2006 and savings of more than $260 million. wine Ranch Water District, California Metropolitan Water District of Southern „California 4 Problem; A growing California town, Goleta was facing the possibility of future water shortages. Its primary water source, Lake Cachuma, was not sufficient to meet its needs. IRWD has experienced dramatic population growth, drought conditions in the late 80s and early 90s, and increasing wholesale water charges. Metropolitan Water District is the largest supplier of water for municipal purposes in the United States. Metropolitan recognized the need for conservation, given increased economic and popula- tion growth, drought, government regulations, water quality concerns, and planned improvement programs. Summary Studies Approach Goleta established a water efficiency program that emphasized plumbing retrofits, including high - efficiency toilets, high- efficiency showerheads, and increased rates. IRWD's' primary conservation strategy was a new rate structure instituted in 1991. The five - tiered rate structure rewards water- efficiency and identifies when water is being wasted. The goal is to create a long -term water efficiency ethic, while maintaining stable utility revenues. Results The program was highly successful, resulting in a 30% drop in district water use. Goleta was able to delay a wastewater treatment plant expansion. After the first year of the new rate structure, water use declined by 19 %. Between 1991 and 1997, the district saved an estimated $33.2 million in avoided water purchases. Massachusetts •Water Resources authority MWRA is a wholesale water provider for 2.2 million people. From 1969 to 1988, MWRA withdrawals exceeded the safe level of 300 mgd by More than 10% annually. MWRA began a water conservation program in 1986 that included leak detecti and repair, plumbing retrofits, a water management program, an education program, and meter improvements. Metropolitan's Conservation Credits Program provides funding for a large percentage of water conservation projects. Projects have included plumbing fixture replacement, water- efficiency surveys, irrigation improvements, training programs, and conservation - related research projects. /8, Conservation efforts reduced average daily water demand from 336 mgd (1987) to 256 mgd (1997). This allowed MWRA to defer a w ate r - supply expansion project and reduce the capacity of the treatment plant, resulting in total savings ranging from $1.39 million per mgd to $1.91 million per mgd; Conservation efforts have considerably reduced the cost estimate of Metropolitan's capital improvement. Water savings have amounted to approximately 66,000 acre -feet per year, a savings of 59 mgd. Summary of Conservation Case Studies New York City, By the early 1990s, increased N ewYork demand and periods of drought resulted in water - supply facilities repeatedly exceeding safe yields. �.� Water rates more than doubled between 1985 and 1993. Phoenix, A rizona Phoenix is one of the fastest growing communities in the United States and suffers from low rainfall amounts. The state legislature has required that, after 2025, Phoenix and suburban communities must not pump groundwater faster than it can be replenished. Water conservation programs instituted in 1986 and 1998 focused on pricing reform, residential and industrial/ commercial conservation, landscaping, education, technical assistance, regulations, planning and research, arid interagency coordination. Phoenix's conservation program currently saves approximately 40 mgd. Phoenix estimates that t he conservation rate structure alone saved 9 mgd. Santa Monica, California `Seattle, Washington Tampa, °Florida Santa Monica faced rapid population growth, which put a strain on its water supplies. Also contamination was found in several wells in 1996, forcing the city to increase water purchases. Steady population growth, dry summers, and lack of long -term storage capacity forced Seattle to choose between reducing use and developing new water sources. Rapid economic and residential population growth along with seasonal population growth has put a strain on Tampa's water supply. Approach New York's conservation initiatives included education, metering, leak detection, water use regulation, and a comprehensive toilet replacement program. Santa Monica instituted a multifaceted water conservation program that includes water -use surveys, education, landscaping measures, toilet retrofits, and a loan program. lq Seattle's water conservation' program has included a seasonal rate structure, plumbing fixture codes, leak reduction, incentives for water - saving products, and public education. Special emphasis has been placed on commercial water conservation. Since 1989, Tampa's water conservation program has included high efficiency plumbing retrofits, an increasing -block rate structure, irrigation restrictions, landscaping measures, and public education Particular emphasis has been put on efficient landscaping and irrigation. Leak detection and repair, metering, and toilet replacements were particularly successful programs. New York reduced its per- capita water use from 195 gallons per day in 1991 to 167 gallons per day in 1998, and produced savings of 20 to 40% on water and wastewater bills. Santa Monica was able to reduce its water use by 14% and waste- water flow by 21 %. The toilet retrofit program resulted in a reduction of 1.9 mgd and net savings of $9.5 million from 1990 to 1995. Per - capita water consumption dropped by 20% in the 1990s. The seasonal rate structure, plumbing codes, and efficiency improvements are particularly credited with success. It is estimated that the commercial water conservation programs will save approximately 8 mgd. Tampa's landscape evaluation program resulted in a 25% drop in water use. A pilot retrofit program achieved a 15% reduction in water use. Summary 5 Summary of Conservation Case Studies :city Wichita, ; Kansas Rapid population growth put a strain on Barrie's water and wastewater infrastructure, forcing the city to consider expensive new supply options and infrastructure development. Barrie's'conservation plan focused on replacing inefficient showerheads and toilets. Barrie, Ontario mgd = million gallons per day 6 Summary Ten years ago, analysts determined that the city's available water resources would not meet its needs beyond the first decade of the 21st century. Alternative sources were not available at an affordable price. Approach Wichita utilized an integrated resource planning approach. This included implementing water conservation, evaluating existing water sources, evaluating nonconventional water resources, optimizing all available water resources, pursuing an application for a conjunctive water resource use permit, evaluating the effects of using different water resources, and communicating with key stakeholders. Analysis of resource options for Wichita resulted in a matrix of 27 conventional and nonconventional resource options. Barrie was able to save an average of 55. liters (14.5 gallons)'. per person per day. The reduction in wastewater flows enabled Barrie to defer an expensive capital expansion project. Water conservation efforts saved an estimated $17.1 million (Canadian dollars) in net deferred capital expenditures. About 1 WaterSense 1 US EPA el UIdL2d 41 CIF C Ir W mnnlBf f4 4t, J II About Us Products Outdoor New Homes Commercial \'Vat eah{r� EPAivregtOMPriNgrarihntact E Us WaterSense About Us About Us FAQ Partner Login You will need Adobe Acrobat Reader to view some of the files on this page. See EPA's PDF page to learn m. about PDF, and for a link to the free Acrobat Reader. Water Efficiency: Our Responsibility Earth may be known as the "water planet ", but even though about 70% of its surface is covered by water, less than l% is available for human use. Water supplies are finite and we can all help protect this critical and precious resource. Page 1 of 2 Pa ri Learn more about why a program like WaterSense is important and how you can do your part to help save water every day, Products & Partnerships WaterSense helps people save water with a product label and tips for saving water around the house. Prod carrying the WaterSense label perform well, help save money, and encourage innovation in manufacturing WaterSense partners with manufacturers, retailers and distributors, and utilities to bring WaterSense label products to the marketplace and make it easy to purchase high - performing, water - efficient products. WaterSense also partners with irrigation professionals and irrigation certification programs to promote wat efficient landscape irrigation practices. Explore WaterSense labeled products and meet our partners. 2/, http://www.epa.gov/watersense/about_us/index.html 8/8/2012 About |VVatm[SeD8e|(1S EPA Page 2 of 2 Making a Difference Since the program's inception in 2006, WaterSense has helped consumers save a cumulative 287 billion gallons of water and over $4.7 billion in water and energy bills. Choose from the reports below to learn more about WaterSense program progress and achievements throughout the years: • WaterSense 2011 Accomplishments Report (PDF) (3 pp, 4.5hMB), 11"x17" (2 pp, 3.98MB) or 8.5"x11" (41 4.55M8) for printing. • 2010 Accomplishments Report (PDF) (6 pp, 926K) • 2009 Accomplishments Report (PDF) (6 pp, 1.1MB) • 2008 Accomplishments Report (PDF) (4 pp, 795K) • 2007 Accomplishments Report (PDF) (4 pp, 452K) • 2006 Accomplishments Report (PDF) (2 pp, 1.2M8) • Methodology and Assumptions (PDF) (3 pp, 89K) Helpline: (866) VVTR-SENS (987-7367) | Contact Us Office of Water WaterSense, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Wastewater Management (4204M), 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.VY.VVanhingLon, D.C. 20460 Last updated on Monday, June 11, 2012 http://www.epa.goy/watersense/about_us/index.html http://www.epa,gov/watersense/about_us/index.html 8/8/2012 WaterSense Statistics & Facts 1 WaterSense 1 US EPA cr 411 4i f li Soo lI`o ni l ('tO;MY'ayll About Us Products Outdoor New Homes Commercial Water SellseeamEpAiggtoorsAaRgrarihntact Us WaterSense About Us Media Resources Statistics & Facts Statistics & Facts • Why Save Water? • WaterSense & Water Savings • Facts & Statistics Page 1 of 2 FAQ Partner Login Pa ri Why Save Water? • Water is a finite resource —even though about 70 percent of the Earth's surface is covered by water, I than 1 percent is available for human use. • At least 36 states are projecting water shortages between now and 2013. • Each American uses an average of 100 gallons of water a day at home. • We can all use 30 percent less water by installing water - efficient fixtures and appliances. • The average household spends as much as $500 per year on their water and sewer bill and can save about $170 per year by installing water- efficient fixtures and appliances. WaterSense & Water Savings • WaterSense labels products that are 20 percent more water - efficient and perform as well as or better than conventional models. • WaterSense labeled faucets —or aerators that can be installed on existing bathroom faucets —are aboi percent more efficient than standard faucets, but still provide plenty of good flow. • WaterSense labeled toilets use 20 percent less water per flush, but perform as well as or better than today's standard toilets and older toilets that use much more water. • The WaterSense label is now found on more than 300 models of showerheads, 730 different types of -style high efficiency toilets, and 2,600 faucet or faucet accessory models that are independently test and certified to meet EPA's criteria for both efficiency and performance. • To reduce outdoor water use, WaterSense is researching weather -based irrigation controllers and soil moisture sensors that do the thinking for you when it comes to watering your lawn. 25, http://www.epa.gov/watersense/about_us/facts.html 8/8/2012 WaterSense Statistics & Facts 1WaterSense1US EPA Page 2 of 2 • To design, service, or audit your in- ground landscape irrigatildtP:Ostm,a100 470 WaterSense irrigation partners. Facts & Statistics • Approximately 5 to 10 percent of American homes have water leaks that drip away 90 gallons a day c more! Many of these leaks reside in old fixtures such as leaky toilets and faucets. In fact, water lost b these leaky residences could be reduced by more than 30,000 gallons if new, efficient fixtures were installed. If the 5 percent of American homes that leak the most corrected those leaks —it could save more than 177 billion gallons of water annually! • Using WaterSense labeled faucets or faucet accessories could reduce a household's faucet water use I more than 500 gallons annually— that's enough water to do 14 loads of laundry. • WaterSense labeled faucets and faucet accessories can reduce excessive flow volumes by more than percent without sacrificing performance. • If one in every 10 homes in the United States were to install WaterSense labeled faucets or faucet accessories in their bathrooms, it could save 6 billion gallons of water, and more than $50 million in t energy costs to supply, heat, and treat that water. • If all inefficient toilets in U.S. homes were converted to WaterSense labeled models, we could save m than 640 billion gallons of water per year —the equivalent to 15 days of flow over Niagara Falls. • If homeowners with irrigation systems use WaterSense irrigation partners to perform regular maintenance, they could reduce irrigation water by 15 percent or about 9,000 gallons annually —or th amount of water that would flow from a garden hose nonstop for nearly a whole day. * Please contact the WaterSense Helpline at watersense @epa.gov or (866) WTR -SENS (987 -7367) if you are interes in learning the sources for these statistics and facts. Helpline: (866) WTR -SENS (987 -7367) 1 Contact Us 1 Office of Water WaterSense, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Wastewater Management (4204M), 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.Washington, D.C. 20460 Last updated on Wednesday, February 08, 2012 21-, http://www.epa.gov/watersense/about_us/facts.html 8/8/2012 EPA WaterSense OMB Control Number 2040 -0272 Approval Expires 06/30/2013 Partnership Agreement: Promotional Partners Section 1: EPA Water Sense Program Goals The EPA WaterSense program aims to use water resources more efficiently to preserve them for future generations and to reduce water and wastewater infrastructure costs by reducing unnecessary water consumption. Through WaterSense, EPA provides reliable information on high - performing, water- efficient products and practices, raises awareness about the importance of water efficiency, ensures water - efficient product performance, helps consumers identify products and servic- es that use less water, promotes innovation in product development, and supports state and local water- efficiency efforts. Section 11: Partnership Pledge As an EPA WaterSense promotional partner, (name of organization), shares EPA's goals as outlined above and is proud to commit to the following activities to further these goals: 1. Educate consumers, residents, businesses, and institutions on the value of water efficiency, the importance of saving water, and the meaning of the WaterSense label. Where feasible, undertake activities and events to achieve mutual WaterSense goals. 2. As appropriate, encourage eligible constituents, members, or affiliates to participate as partners in the EPA WaterSense program. 3. For utilities and governments: On an annual basis, provide data to EPA on promotional activities and incentive programs to assist in determining the impact of the program in promoting labeled products. 4. For applicable trade associations: Provide aggregate data to EPA on market share of WaterSense labeled prod- ucts and programs in relevant industry. Compile data submitted by members who are also WaterSense partners into a summary report to assist EPA in evaluating market trends and the success of the WaterSense program, with- out disclosing any proprietary information from members. 5. Adhere to all policies and procedures contained in the Program Guidelines, 6. Feature the WaterSense promotional label and partner logo on website and in other promotional materials. 7. Adhere to WaterSense program mark guidelines and ensure that authorized representatives, such as advertising agencies, distributors, and subcontractors, also comply. Help EPA maintain program integrity by alerting EPA to possible misuse(s) of the WaterSense program marks, 8. Grant the EPA WaterSense program permission to include partner's name on a list of participating partners on the WaterSense website, program materials, and announcements. Partners understand that from time to time, EPA will be interested in profiling partner accomplishments in case studies and articles. If selected for such promotion, partners will have the opportunity to provide input and review the final print or web document before EPA releas- es it to the public. Further, the partner understands that EPA might refer media contacts interested in publicizing water efficiency to partners for information about products and accomplishments. Section 111: EPA WaterSense Program's Commitments to Partners 1. Develop national specifications for water - efficient products and programs through an open, public process. 2. Increase awareness of the WaterSense brand by distributing key messages on the benefits of labeled products and programs, and the importance of water efficiency. 3. Provide current EPA WaterSense program news, information, and reference documents (via the program website, WaterSense Helpline, e -mail, or other means), including a listing of labeled products and programs on the website. 4. Provide WaterSense partners with public recognition for their involvement in the program and role in protecting the environment through online listing of partners, special awards, publications, and other efforts. 5. Respond swiftly to partner requests for information or clarification on EPA WaterSense program policies. 6. Provide materials, templates, and program marks for promotional use, consistent with the WaterSense Program Guidelines. 7. Review pre -press promotional items, draft websites, packaging, or other materials that use the WaterSense marks upon request. EPA Form Number 6100 -06 Z5 , Section 1V: General Terms and Disclaimers 1. The partner will not construe, claim, or imply that its participation in the EPA WaterSense program constitutes fed- eral government (EPA) approval, acceptance, or endorsement of anything other than the partner's commitment to the program. 2. Nothing in this agreement, in and of itself, obligates the EPA to expend appropriations or to enter into any con- tract, assistance agreement, interagency agreement, or incur other financial obligations that would be inconsistent with Agency budget priorities. The partner agrees not to submit a claim for compensation for services rendered to EPA or any Federal Agency in connection with any activities it carries out in furtherance of this agreement. 3. The partner and the EPA WaterSense program will assume good faith as a general principle for resolving conflict and will seek to resolve all matters informally, so as to preserve maximum public confidence in the program. 4. Failure to comply with any of the terms of this partnership agreement can result in its termination and cessation of access to the benefits of the program, including use of the program marks. 5. The EPA WaterSense program will actively pursue resolution of noncompliance related to the use of the program marks. 6. Both parties concur that this agreement is wholly voluntary and may be terminated by either party at any time, and for any reason, with no penalty. Termination will begin effective immediately upon written notice to or from the EPA WaterSense program, Upon termination of this agreement, partners agree to remove program marks in a timely manner, consistent with the WaterSense program mark guidelines. To be completed by partner Authorized Partner Representative (printed name): Title: E -mail: Signature: Date: Organization Name: Number of employees: Organization Type (choose one): ❑ Nongovernmental Organization ❑ Utility ❑ Local Government 0 State Government ❑ Trade Association ❑ Home Builders Association Industry /SIC /NAICS code: Population served Primary Contact: Dr. /Mr. /Mrs. /Ms. Title: Dept.: E -mail: Address: City/State/ZIP: Water District, if applicable: Website: Telephone: Alternate Telephone: How did you find out about this program? ❑ Website ❑ Referral, Name: 0 Periodical: ❑ Workshop, Sponsor: ❑ Mailing: ❑ EPA Region: ❑ Other: To be completed by EPA Authorized EPA Representative (printed name): Sheila E. Frace Title: Director, Municipal Support Division E mail; watersense @epa.gov Signature: Date: 1 The authorized partner representative should be a person in the organization with signing authority (e.g., vice president). 2 Please Indicate the total residential population served rather than the number of hookups. EPA Form Number 6100 -06 Submit the Partnership Agreement (rewriteable PDT) to WaterSense via: Fax: (703) 841 -1440 Mail: WaterSense, c/o ERG, 2300 Wilson Blvd, Suite 350, Arlington, VA 22201 Electronically: If you have Adobe Acrobat, you can complete the form electronically and e -mail it to; watersense@epa.gov. Please contact the WaterSense Helpline at (866) WTR -SENSE (987 -7367) if you have any questions about eligibility, partnership, or for general program inquiries. After signing, EPA will send partners an executed copy of this agreement. The public reporting and record keeping burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 8 hours per response. Send comments on the Agency's need for this information, the accuracy of the provided burden estimates, and any suggested methods for minimizing respondent burden, including through the use of auto- mated collection techniques to the Director, Collection Strategies Division, U,S, Environmental Protection Agency (2822T), 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW, Washington, D.C. 20460. Include the OMB control number in any correspondence. Do not send the completed Partnership Agreement to this address, EPA Form Number 6100 -06 27, Update for August 13, 2012 EEAC Workshop PACE Subcommittee Report The PACE subcommittee met on July 16 to review work completed to date and develop recommendations for Energy & Environment Advisory Commission (EEAC) consideration. The PACE subcommittee looks forward to discussing the recommendations below at the Aug. 13 EEAC meeting. COUNCIL. ACTION REQUESTED: Authorize and direct city staff to develop and launch an initial phase Property Assessed Clean Energy Program (PACE) following MN Statue 216C.436. INFORMATION/BACKGROUND: In an effort to advance the city's energy efficiency, sustainability and economic development goals, the Eagan Energy & Environment Advisory Commission (EEAC) recommends that the Eagan City Council authorize staff to develop and execute a PACE program that secures financing for energy efficiency and renewable energy projects via voluntary property tax special assessments. There are eleven program requirements under the state statute, including: • Establishing financing teens that do not exceed the useful life of the project or 20 years, whichever comes first. The assessment amount cannot exceed the lesser of 10% of the assessed property value or the actual cost of installing the energy improvements. The established interest rate must cover the cost of program administration. The borrowers' ability to pay and the status of the borrower's current mortgage payments must be verified. • Completing an energy audit or feasibility study, as well as an inspection and performance verification of at least 10% of the energy improvements. 6 Disclosing to borrowers the risks involved in borrowing, including risk of foreclosure if taxes are not paid. In the fall of 2011, the City of Edina became the first in the state to launch a PACE program. The city's November 16 Council Connection newsletter notes, "The program provides private funding through a special assessment conduit that is secured by the property itself, not the borrower. Special assessment revenue bonds issued by the City through this conduit are secured by the property. According to legal counsel, these special assessment bonds do not count against the City's legal debt limit." By setting up a PACE program, the City acts as an intermediary by issuing and selling bonds and collecting loan repayments through special property tax assessments. The City then forwards tax payments to a specific lending institution or a lending pool. The assumption is that lending institutions will be interested in these loans because they have first lien on the property, and therefore are at a low risk of default. 280 The City will issue revenue bonds which will be purchased by a lending institution provided by the applicant, or made available through a lender pool. The City will charge an upfront fee and an interest rate spread on the bonds to reimburse itself for the costs of administering the program. The EEAC recommends that a modest fixed amount be dedicated for program development to defer the cost of initial application through the program. The entire amount of loan principal, plus fees and capitalized interest should be added to the overall voluntary special assessment against the property. The viability of first liens remains in question for housing due to developments at the federal level. The Federal Housing Financing Agency (FHFA) has "urged state and local governments to reconsider these programs and continues to call for a pause in such programs so (first lien) concerns can be addressed" (FHFA Press Release 7/6/2010). There is proposed legislation in the U.S. House of Representatives that would remedy the issue (HR 2599). Commercial programs would not be subject to the FHFA guidance so the EEAC recommends PACE only apply to commercial and industrial properties and multifamily housing not subject to FHFA oversight. Single - family and other residential homes should be excluded from the program at this time. The EEAC recommends that the City administer the program through the Community Development department. All normal building permit processes and fees will apply to resulting projects. INITIAL PHASE DETAILS Due to pending federal legislation and potential efforts at the state level to facilitate local program implementation, the EEAC recommends that the City of Eagan begin by launching an initial phase. This will place the City of Eagan in a leadership position, allow it to gain the experience needed to better understand barriers to energy finance in the local market, and prepare it to inform and benefit from potential future initiatives at the state and federal level. The EEAC proposes that the City of Eagan set a goal to launch the pilot phase by February 1, 2013. The pilot phase shall include: 1. Details finalized before the launch date: o Program materials including a summary and eligibility guidelines o Application materials including a petition for voluntary special assessments o Administrative guidelines clarifying the approval process and whether /when applications should be approved administratively or by the City Council o Program fees and financing details o A program name 2. A letter sent to local banks informing them of the voluntary opportunity to participate in a lender pool, with potential for an informational event depending on interest and staff capacity 3. Outreach to businesses via the chamber of commerce, local media, Eagan Business News, and city social media 4. A presence on the city website with program details, application materials, fees and financing details including information on local lenders that have opted into a lender pool o The city website presence should also list information on electric and gas utility rebates and financing available to businesses and residents in Eagan and note where to find information on tax credits available for energy efficiency and clean energy projects financeable through this program. The state statute requires coordination and cooperation with utility conservation programs. 5. A city staff member designated to serve as the program administrator 6. Coordination with Dakota County, the Metropolitan Energy Policy Coalition (comprised of commissioners from Twin Cities area counties), other local governments, and the State Department of Commerce 7. Recommendations for modifications based on program experience or efforts by other cities, counties and the state, including the possibility of participating in a regionally - aggregated program or a third -party administered program Update for August 13, 2012 EEAC Workshop Ordinances Subcommittee Report The Energy & Environment Advisory Commission (EEAC) Ordinances Subcommittee met twice since June. On July 7 the subcommittee met to review work completed to date, prepare for a meeting with city staff to discuss landscaping ordinances, and develop annual work plan recommendations to share at the next commission meeting. Notes from that meeting appear below. On July 16, the subcommittee met with a group of city staff members representing numerous departments, including engineering, water resources, parks & recreation, planning, code enforcement and fire. The meeting was held as a result of action taken at the April EEAC meeting requesting staff feedback on the landscaping and maintenance of vegetation model ordinance. Following the subcommittee meeting, city staff members will edit the model ordinance with their proposed changes. The subcommittee proposes to reconvene to review input from city staff and bring forward recommendations on the model ordinance at the EEAC meeting following the coming one on Aug. 13. The subcommittee is prepared to provide an update on these two meetings and welcomes EEAC feedback on the work plan and next steps. Ordinances Subcommittee Meeting Notes Saturday, July 7 10:30a Present: Jon Drucker, Mike Wisniewski, Amir Nadav I. Background on Ordinances • Amir provided high level overview of ordinances existing and history of ordinance review as directed by City Council. II. Review April 2012 EEAC ordinance recommendation & prep for upcoming meeting with city staff. Dialog on work done thus far: • Summarized several examples of ambiguous language used within city code and permit request process • Focus on clarity on 'right of way' within city, state. Number of non- compliance depending on setback measurement utilized • Recommend adapting comprehensive landscaping and maintenance of vegetation as written from 2000 Environmental Quality Board and the 2008 Minnesota Pollution Control Agency • Review recommendations created in April 2012 and dialog about modifying those recommendations • Of the April 2012 recommendations, two were modified in advance of city staff meeting 1) [In the model ordinance] Strike part of sentence found within section V - B. sentence rewritten as: "Landscape area; Permitted landscaping; ornamental plants; native forbs and grasses; or vegetable and fruit bearing plants are allowed in the landscape area." 2) Any fence 36" or lower does not need a city permit 3/, III. Develop recommendations for EEAC ordinance subcommittee work plan • Proposed work plan for upcoming term dialog o Publish all information available on City of Eagan licensed waste haulers from city website o Uniform reporting schedule requirement of licensed waste haulers (possible amendments needed) o Focusing on solar power next steps described in December 2011 EEAC packet o Identify what state resources are currently available to assist in guiding our work plan [see the following packet materials: • "Minnesota Dept. of Commerce to help streamline solar installations" • Minnesota Department of Commerce website, "Minnesota Solar Challenge] Ordinances Subcommittee Report (From Dec. 2011 EEAC Packet) On Dec. 2, 2011 the ordinances subcommittee met with Dale Schoeppner, Chief Building Official, Mary Granley, Senior Code Enforcement Technician and Juli Seydell Johnson, Director of Parks & Recreation and staff to the Energy & Environment Advisory Commission. The following summarizes the items discussed and proposed next steps: Solar Energy Solar energy systems are defined in Sec. 13.04 of city code and are permitted in the city of Eagan. The city code, however, lacks a section dedicated to solar energy. Guidelines and standards specific to solar energy system design, size, setbacks, pole- mounted options, and more do not exist and are applied based on applicability of other sections of city code. A permit fee schedule is also not currently available. City code directs the planning commission and city council to consider possible solar energy use during subdivision platting, however a city handbook on solar access does not exist. • Section 13.04 Definitions: o Solar energy system means a set of devices whose primary purpose is to collect solar energy and convert and store it for useful purposes, including heating and cooling of buildings and other energy using processes, or to produce generated power by means of any combination of collecting, transferring or converting solar generated energy. o Solar skyspace means the space between a solar collector and the sun which must be free of obstructions that shade the collector to an extent which precludes its cost effective operation. • Section 13.20 Subd. 6 Findings related to preliminary and final plats. In the case of all platting, the planning commission and the council shall be guided by criteria, including the following, in approving, denying or establishing conditions related thereto: o I. That the subdivision has been properly planned for possible solar energy system use within the subdivision or as it relates to adjacent property. (Refer to city handbook on solar access.) .5 2 Recommended next steps: • Clarify current city code parameters that apply to the design and installation of solar energy systems. • Work with city staff to create handbook on solar access referenced in city code. • Propose changes to current city code guidelines and restrictions on solar energy system use, culminating in the possible adoption of a self- contained solar energy ordinance. • Establish and publish a permit fee schedule for solar energy systems • Create a page on the city website that clearly outlines the process for installing solar energy systems, the various standards to be followed, and links to state, federal tax incentives and utility rebates. http : / /www.lwinciti cs.com /localnews /ci_ 21228939 /minnesota- dept- oouunerce- help - streamline- solar - installations ?source =rss Minnesota Dept. of Commerce to help streamline solar installations By Leslie Brooks Suzukamo lsuzulcamo@pioneerpress.com TwinCities.com- Pioneer Press Posted: Cina's program has a deadline of Feb. 15 next year to complete its work. Leslie Brooks Suzukamo can be reached at 651- 228 -5475. Follow him at twitter.com /suzukamo. Page 1 of 1 TwinCities.com When it comes to installing solar energy in Minnesota, advocates say, the path to going green is often snarled in red tape. Getting building permits for fairly straightforward installations can take days -- unnecessarily, the advocates say -- and the delays cost money as work crews and suppliers wait around. So the Minnesota Department of Commerce is embarking on an effort called the Minnesota Solar Challenge to streamline solar energy permitting processes and remove zoning roadblocks across the state. It took its first step Friday, Aug. 3, by choosing the Minnesota Renewable Energy Society to coordinate outreach efforts to educate cities and towns about what's needed and what's not when it comes to solar installations. For example, many building inspectors worry about the extra weight of solar photovoltaic panels on roofs. Some require installers to hire a structural engineer to inspect the roof, said Laura Cina, managing director of the Minnesota Renewable Energy Society. "That can add $500 to $1,000 to the project," she said. But if the panels are laid flat and tied to the trusses, they can actually help strengthen a roof, she said. On the other hand, if the panels are raised off the roof at an angle, the wind can catch them and building inspectors should pay more attention to those installations, Cina said. Cina will lead the effort to reach the cities and towns and help train their counter clerks and officials in a series of regional workshops. While some cities have restrictions on solar energy installations, most cities simply have no regulations addressing them, she said. The outreach effort will encourage those cities to adopt procedures modeled after those in St. Paul and Minneapolis, which are part of a U.S. Department of Energy program to encourage more rooftop solar installations. Minnesota Commerce Commissioner Mike Rothman said working with local leaders to change permitting procedures or zoning barriers is a critical part of an effort to meeting the state's renewable energy goals. The Minnesota Solar Challenge, which is funded by a $260,000 Department of Energy grant, also has efforts to work on issues of interconnection with utilities and how much to pay for solar electricity sold into the grid from installations that make more than the customer uses, Cina said. 07/08/2012 19:37 PM Minnesota Solar Challenge Page 1 of 3 Department of Commerce .energy Share or Print This Paqe Minnesota Solar Challenge Solar energy production is a small but growing resource in Minnesota, where we now have more than eight megawatts (MW) of solar electric capacity. The Minnesota Solar Challenge project is a collaboration between the Minnesota Department of Commerce, Division of Energy Resources, Cities of Minneapolis and Saint Paul, Fresh Energy, and Xcel Energy to provide support for local communities pursuing increased access to financing, standardized permitting processes, and updated planning and zoning codes and other solar - related policies. Information on this project is divided out into the following topic areas: • Project Assistance • Project Resources • Background & Goals Project Assistance Do you need assistance with interconnection, permitting, zoning, or billing questions related to solar electric installations? We have technical assistance available for the following audiences: • Building Officials • Electric Utilities • Solar Installers • Local Government The Minnesota Solar Challenge project provides assistance with permitting, zoning, and interconnection of solar electric systems. Resources include established best practices for streamlined solar permitting guidelines and checklists, solar planning and zoning ordinances that accommodate solar electric installations and assistance with interconnection issues. Our main goal is to remove barriers to solar electric installations in Minnesota communities that wish to facilitate solar deployment. To request technical assistance on solar electric installations, contact the Solar Helpline at: 651.296.7904 (Twin Cities) 855.374.6822 (Greater Minnesota) solar.helpc1 state.mn.us http: / /mn.gov /connnerce/ energy /topics /clean- energy / Solar /Minnesota - Solar- Challenge.jsp 8/8/2012 Minnesota Solar Challenge Page 2 of 3 Project Resources Rooftop Solar Challenge Teams from across the country are taking the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Rooftop Solar Challenge to make installing rooftop photovoltaics (PV) easier, faster, and cheaper for homeowners and businesses. Best Practices for Permitting Establishing a transparent, consistent, and expedient permitting process can help reduce non - hardware costs of a rooftop PV system. The Solar America Board for Codes and Standards (Solar ABCs) Expedited Permit Process provides tools to differentiate systems that fast track permitting due to similarity with the majority of small -scale PV systems. The City of Minneapolis employed the Solar ABCs guidance to successfully develop their own streamlined permitting process. Solar Guide for Local Governments The U. S Department of Energy has provided a community- focused guide specifically for local governments that seek to simplify solar installation in their communities. The guide introduces a range of policy and program options that can help a community build a sustainable solar infrastructure. Background & Goals The U.S. Department of Energy recognizes that while the equipment costs of solar have decreased, the non - hardware costs of permitting, interconnection, installation, and design remain relatively high. The Minnesota Solar Challenge project is a collaboration between the Minnesota Department of Commerce, Division of Energy Resources, Cities of Minneapolis and Saint Paul, Fresh Energy and Xcel Energy to address these and other impediments to effective installation of rooftop photovoltaics. The project brings together government officials, regulatory entities, private industry, local utilities, and other stakeholders to reduce barriers to solar installation and to serve as a model for other communities across the country. Minnesota is one of 22 awardees to receive funding nationwide. The Minnesota Solar Challenge project provides support for local communities pursuing increased access to financing, standardized permit processes, and updated planning and zoning codes and other solar related policies. These measures will help reduce non - hardware costs, which account for up to 40 percent of the total cost of solar energy systems. The overall goal is to identify and provide best practices for state and local procedures that expedite the integration of photovoltaic (PV) systems for both residential and small commercial rooftop applications. The expected results are as follows: • lower balance -of- system costs for residential and small commercial rooftop PV systems • reduced time needed for approvals and inspections of grid- connected rooftop PV • reduced transaction costs associated with installing PV 36, http: / /mn.gov/ commerce /energy /topics /clean- energy/ Solar /Minnesota - Solar- Challenge.jsp 8/8/2012 Minnesota Solar Challenge Page 3 of 3 new or simplified financing options for PV homeowners, businesses, and installers The Rooftop Solar Challenge is part of the U.S. DOE SunShot Initiative, which is a collaborative national effort to make solar cost - competitive with other forms of energy by the end of the decade. Access more information about the SunShot Initiative. View information on individual Rooftop Solar Challenge awards. http: / /mn.gov /commerce /energy /topics /clean- energy /Solar /Minnesota- Solar- Challenge.jsp 8/8/2012 City of Eapa Pfess Rim Contact: Tom Garrison Director of Communications Office (651) 675 -5008 tarrison@cityofeagan.com June 27, 2012 Eagan Praised for Energy Best Practices Eagan is among only four Minnesota cities recognized as having taken the most steps to implement energy use reductions and best practices. Eagan was lauded as part of the GreenStep Cities program for accomplishing 20 of 28 best practices, so far, in sustainability at last week's League of Minnesota Cities Conference in Duluth. In recent years, the City utilized geothermal energy- saving technology in the Eagan Civic Arena and the new Fire Safety Center, as well as switching to more energy efficient lighting and sealing building "envelopes" to prevent energy loss in government buildings. Not only is kilowatt usage per square foot dropping citywide in government buildings, but energy expenditures and carbon dioxide (CO emissions are also down. As an example, from March of 2011 through February of this year, kilowatt usage at the Civic Arena is down 42 %, energy costs per square foot are down 14% and CO emissions are down 4.5 %. At City Hall, emissions are down 15 %. "This is exactly what the Eagan City Council wanted to see in directing GreenStep City participation and adopting environmentally preferable purchasing policies," said Eagan Mayor Mike Maguire, who credits the dedicated work of the City's Energy and Environment Advisory Commission (EEAC) and staff in reaching level three of the program. Earlier steps involve passing a resolution to become a GreenStep City and implementing up to eight of the program's best practices. "Step Three" cities, which this year included Eagan, Edina, Falcon Heights and St. Anthony, had to implement 16 or more sustainable best practices focused on cost savings, energy reductions, and innovation. Eagan's 20 best practices include participating in a benchmarking database, conserving drinking water resources with updated ordinances, replacing traffic signals with energy efficient LED lights, and incorporating access to locally grown food in a city park. "Many of these things, like the fresh produce at Marketfest in Eagan, were already being done before participating in GreenSteps," says Eagan City Administrator Tom Hedges, "but by tighter tracking of energy trends we're also able to target where our next improvements need to be." The Energy and Environment Advisory Commission continues to study additional methods to meet further GreenStep requirements. The Commission will be discussing possible next steps with the City Council later this fall. Overall, some 65 Minnesota cities are currently participating in the GreenStep Cities program, which is a partnership between the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, the League of Minnesota Cities, the Minnesota Office of Energy Security, the Great Plains Institute, the Izzak Walton League, the Urban Land Institute in Minnesota, and the Clean Energy Resource Teams. Additional Information: http: / /www.lmc.org /page /1 /greenstepl2- nr.jsp http : / /greenstep.pca.state.mn.us / Ja„cceD STq o 46. A Sustainable Materials Management Initiative Save money, get recognized, and reduce your environmental footprint by joining EPA's Food Recovery Challenge (FRC). What is the Food Recovery Challenge? A new EPA initiative under the Sustainable Materials Management Program where participants commit to reducing food waste reaching landfills through prevention, donation, composting and /or anaerobic digestion. Why Join? ✓ Improve your bottom line through cost savings from reduced purchasing and waste fees o Financially, wasted food costs America more than $100 billion annually o Approximately 30% of all food purchases end up as waste ✓ Support your community by feeding people, not landfills o 50 million Americans (or 14% of American households) were food insecure in 2009 o Much of the excess food discarded in landfills is safe, wholesome food that can feed people ✓ Reduce your environmental impact and greenhouse gas emissions o Food is the most disposed material in the U.S. with over 33 million tons reaching landfills each year o American waste enough food to fill the Rose Bowl stadium every day o Food production impacts water quality, soil productivity, and contributes to about 13% of greenhouse gas emissions ✓ Get recognized for your innovative work — Help brand recognition! o Formal recognition /Awards — will be awarded to top performers annually at a national level o Informal recognition • Be featured in webinars, case studies, and on EPA website — facilitate peer learning ✓ Receive technical assistance to complete baseline assessment and undertake food waste reduction activities • ReTRAC - EPA's free waste tracking system (http: / /www.epa.gov /epawaste/ conserve /smm /wastewise /index.htm) • Reporting system as well as way to compile and analyze waste management data • Generates instant reports on performance and trends, and calculates GHG emission reductions • EPA's Food Waste Management Cost Calculator (http: / /www.epa.gov /epawaste/ conserve /materials /organics /food /tools /index.htm) • Estimates cost competitiveness of alternatives to food waste disposal • Sustainable Food Management Webinar Series • Highlights partner success, provides training and success stories on technical issues • Clearinghouse of information on food waste reduction and recovery activities on EPA website • EPA is in the progress of creating more tools to help producers of food waste reduce food reaching landfills. Feedback from partners appreciated. Who Can Join? Levels of Participation... Participant: Any entity that generates food waste. • National focus on universities /colleges, sports venues, and grocers. Endorser: An entity that helps recruit participants, such as a states /local governments, food rescue organizations, and industry trade organizations. How to Join? Note: Assistance in signing up and reporting is available from EPA staff or ReTRAC contractors. 1. Sign Up in WasteWise ( http: / /my.re- trac .com /NewWasteWisePartner.pm) • Once you are a WasteWise partner, you can join the Food Recovery Challenge by signing into WasteWise Re -TRAC, clicking on "Organization Information ", and selecting the "Food Recovery Challenge" checkbox 2. Assess It! Enter your baseline food waste data into ReTRAC within 90 days of joining 3. Commit to It! Set a three year goal for reducing the amount of food waste reaching landfills • Year One: At least a 5% increase in at least one of the three food diversion categories (prevention, donation, and composting) • Years Two and Three: Site - specific numerical targets based on opportunities at your facility 4. Do It! Undertake food recovery activities to meet your goals and reduce food reaching landfills 5. Track It! Report progress annually using EPA's waste tracking system, ReTRAC Sector- Specific information Grocers Partial List of Grocers in Food Recovery Challenge: Big Y Foods Harris Teeter Wakefern Boston Organics New Seasons Whole Foods Hannaford Bros. Supervalu Other Program(s) for Grocers: GreenChill — Advanced Refrigeration Partnership ( http : / /www.epa.gov /greenchill/) • Goal to reduce refrigerant emissions and decrease impact on ozone layer and climate change Universities /Colleges Partial List of Universities /Colleges in Food Recovery Challenge: Harvard Rutgers University Middlebury College St. John's University MIT Marshall University Other Program(s) for Universities /Colleges: RecycleMania (http: / /recyclemaniacs.org /) • Goal is to promote waste reduction activities at universities and colleges • Schools compete against each other GameDay Challenge (http: / /www.epa.gov /epawaste/ conserve /smm /wastewise /challenge /gameday /index.htm) • Goal is promote waste reduction at collegiate football games thru EPA's WasteWise Program Venues Partial List of Venues in Food Recovery Challenge: San Diego Padres MGM Resorts Chumash Casino Allstate Arena Seattle Mariners Minnesota Twins University of Missouri- Kansas City Colorado State University Excel Energy Center Atlanta Braves Philadelphia Eagles Other Program(s) for Venues Green Sports Alliance ( http : / /greensportsalliance.org /) • Non - profit to help sports teams, venues, and leagues enhance their environmental performance • Green Sports Alliance is helping promote the Food Recovery Challenge • EPA was a founding partner of the Green Sports Alliance Questions? Contact Julie Schilf — schilf.luliePepa.gov — (312) 886 -0407 R Visit In _ Free Electronics Recycling Eagan Community Center Saturday, Aug.25th 9:OOam - 1:00pm Items to Bring: Game Consoles Cellphones and PDAs Monitors/Ns($10 on CRTs) Cords, Cables and Mice Switches, Routers and Hubs CPUs, Memory and Disk Drives Laptops and Desktop Computers Satellite, Cable and TiVo Receivers Peripheral Cards and Expansion Hardware Items NOT to Bring Humidifiers Microwaves Dishwashers Water Heaters Space Heaters Washers and Dryers TVs Larger Than 27" Refrigerators and Freezers Data storing devices are sanitized of personal information & data Tax deductible receipt available for all donations This drive -thru recycling and donation event is an opportunity for individuals to effectively and efficiently recycle their old electronics. Additional information about the event can be found by visiting: http : / /www,techdump,org/ 42, Questions? Call 763-432-3117