Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
3254 Aspen Ct
/t iM 2 5?a3.2� /�%Q9 � �O ciY 1 hp , 6- / )fr evoti / 2 • t Permit �7� 5 c 3 2 i_ Permit Fee: 59 23 2.6 �Q Date Received: Use BLUE or BLACK Ink For Office Use 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan MN 55122 Phone: (651) 675-5673 Fax: (651) 675-5694 10 �' ?&tiinl hour i'vi 3,31/6 2012 COMMERCIAL BUILD Staff: IG PERMIT APPLICATION Date: 8/9/2012 Site Address UNIT ADDRESS : Af5d:IE NI Cr UNIT TYPE (Tenant is: New l Existing) Suits-#: Former Tenant: PROPERTY OWNER Name: Northwood Family Housing LPPhone: 651-675-4400 Address I City I Zip: 1228 Town Centre Dr., Eagan, MN 55123 Applicant is: — Owner_ Contractor X TYPE OF WORK Construct 47 townhore units in 9 buildings, Description of work: roads, and site improvements. Construction Cost: Total protect cost: $5,127,000.00 CONTRACTOR Name: CBS Construction Services, Inc. License #: Address: 11124 Zealand Ave. N. City: Caplin State: MN Zip: 55316 Phone: 763-569-4020 Contact: Jason Barrett Email: Jason@cbsconstruct.com -i ARCHITECT! ENGINEER Name: MB Registration #: 17402 Address: 250 3rd Ave. N., Suite 450 City: Minnepolis State: MN Zip: 55401 Phone: 612-752_6957 Contact Person: Roger Purdy Email: rager.purdy@lhbcorp.com Licensed plumber installing new sewer/water service: J-Eerd Mechanical Phone #: 320-656-0847 NOTE: Plans and supporting documents that you submit are considered to be public information. Portions of the information may be classified as nonpublic if you provide specific reasons that would permit the City to L.__ conclude that they are trade secrets. CALL BEFORE YOU DIG. Call Gopher State One Call at (651) 454-0002 for protection against underground utility damage. Call 48 hours before you intend to dig to receive locates of underground utilities. wvvw.donherstateonecall.orq I hereby acknowledge that this information is complete and accurate; that the work will be in conformance with the ordinances and codes of the City of Eagan; that I understand this is not a permit, but only an application for a permit, and work is not to start without a permit; that the work will be in accordance with the approved plan in the case of work which rewires a review' . d approval of plans. x Jason Barrett, V.P., P.M. Applicant's Printed Name x Applicant's Signa V Page 1 of 3 DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE S•3 SUB TYPES Foundation Ingle Family Multi 01 of _ Plex Accessory Building WORK TYPES /New Addition Alteration Replace Retaining Wall DESCRIPTION Valuation Plan Review (25% V"100% ) Census Code # of Units # of Buildings Type of Construction 1i.3 Fireplace Garage Deck Lower Level Interior Improvement Move Building Fire Repair Repair SS, 000 J 1-1 orch (3 -Season) Porch (4 -Season) Porch (Screen/Gazebo/Pergola) Pool Occupancy Code Edition Zoning Stories Square Feet Length Width RE9UIRED INSPECTIONS V Footings (New Building) Footings (Deck) Footings (Addition) V Foundation Drain Tile ✓ Roof: ✓Ice & Water 'Final / Framing Fireplace: _Rough In Air Test Final /Insulation / Sheathing Sheetrock Reviewed By: C414 Siding Reroof Windows Egress Window Storm Damage Exterior Alteration (Single Family) Exterior Alteration (Multi) Miscellaneous Demolish Building* Demolish Interior Demolish Foundation Water Damage *Demolition of entire building — give PCA handout to applicant let 0.2- 7.006 •L7'VL /BG PP Z /3 /3 MCES System SAC Units City Water Booster Pump PRV Fire Sprinklers Meter Size: / Final / C.O. Required Final / No C.O. Required HVAC Gas Service Test Gas Line Air Test Other: Pit- ekvLt✓NG Pool: Footings _Air/Gas Tests Siding: Stucco Lath Stone Lath Windows Retaining Wall: Footings _ Backfill ✓ Radon Control ✓ Erosion Control Building Inspector Final Brick Final RESIDENTIAL FEES Base Fee Surcharge Plan Review MCES SAC City SAC Utility Connection Charge S&W Permit & Surcharge Treatment Plant Copies TOTAL Page 2 of 3 Page 1 Report Prepared By: For: Residential Heat Loss and Heat Gain Calculation 8/23/2012 In accordance with ACCA Manual J J-Berd Mechanical Northwood Family Housing 3254 Bldg #7 Unit B3 f SQ.ev CA— Lexington ALexington Ave & Northwood Parkway Eagan, Minnesota Design Conditions: Eagan Indoor: Summer temperature: Winter temperature: Relative humidity: 72 70 55 Outdoor: Summer temperature: Winter temperature: Summer grains of moisture: 88 -15 98 Daily temperature range: Medium Building Component Sensible Gain (BTUH) Latent Gain (BTUH) Total Heat Gain (BTUH) Total Heat Loss (BTUH) Whole House 1,018 sq.ft. 20,260 3,409 23,669 (2 tons) 50,759 First Floor 14,258 Entire First Floor 563 sq.ft. 14,258 Infiltration 850 - Tightness: Avg.; Winter ACH: 1.06 ; Summer ACH: .5 2,036 2,036 1,116 16,294 37,668 16,294 1,966 37,668 9,578 People 4 1,200 Floor 563 sq.ft. 0 - Concrete slab on grade; Concrete; 2 in. edge R - 11 S Wall 267 sq.ft. 314 - Wood frame, with sheathing, siding or brick; R-19 5 1/2 in.; none 920 2,120 0 0 0 314 1,606 1,362 Window 25 sq.ft. 720 0 - Single pane; Vinyl frame; Clear glass - Draperies or blinds; Coating: None (clear glass); No outside shading. 720 1,893 Window (2) 12 sq.ft. 346 - Single pane; Vinyl frame; Clear glass - Draperies or blinds; Coating: None (clear glass); No outside shading. 0 W Wall 47 sq.ft. 55 - Wood frame, with sheathing, siding or brick; R-19 5 1/2 in.; none 346 0 55 909 240 Door 21 sq.ft. 151 - Metal; Fiberglass; Storm 0 151 655 E Wall 96 sq.ft. 113 - Wood frame, with sheathing, siding or brick; R-19 5 1/2 in.; none Window 30 sq.ft. 1,584 0 - Single pane; Vinyl frame; Clear glass - Draperies or blinds; Coating: None (clear glass); No outside shading. 0 113 1,584 490 2,272 Page 2 Northwood Family Housing 8/23/2012 Building Component Sensible Latent Total Total Gain Gain Heat Gain Heat Loss (BTUH) (BTUH) (BTUH) (BTUH) Glassdoor 42 sq.ft. 2,722 0 2,722 3,534 - Sliding glass door; Single pane; Wood or vinyl frame; Clear glass - Roller shades;' Coating: None (clear glass); No outside shading. N Wall 286 sq.ft. 505 0 - Wood frame, with sheathing, siding or brick; R-11 3 1/2 in.; none Door 18 sq.ft. - Metal; Fiberglass; No storm 208 W Wall (2) 95 sq.ft. 168 - Wood frame, with sheathing, siding or brick; R-11 3 1/2 in.; none Ceiling 455 sq.ft. 5,223 - Under ventilated attic; Wood decking, no insulation; Dark 505 208 .............. 168 2,188. 903 727 5,223 Ceiling (2) 108 sq.ft. - Under unheated room; R-44 (14 inch); Dark Second Floor Entire Second Floor 455 sq.ft. 99 6,002 6,002 Infiltration 344 - Tightness: Avg.; Winter ACH: 1.06 ; Summer ACH: .5 People 4 _ 1,200 Floor 455 sq.ft. - Over conditioned space 0 0 1,373 1,373 453 920 0 11,100 99 7,375 7,375 797 2,120 0 211 13,091 13,091 3,883 S Wall 192 sq.ft. 226 - Wood frame, with sheathing, siding or brick; R-19 5 1/2 in.; none W Wall 160 sq.ft. 188 - Wood frame, with sheathing, siding or brick; R-19 5 1/2 in.; none E Wall 100 sq.ft. 118 0 Wood frame, with sheathing, siding or brick; R-19 5 1/2 in.; none Window 30 sq.ft. 1,584 0 1,584 2,272 - Single pane; Vinyl frame; Clear glass - Draperies or blinds; Coating: None (clear glass); No outside shading. 0 226 188 118 979 816 510 Window(2) 30 sq.ft. 1,584 0 - Single pane; Vinyl frame; Clear glass - Draperies or blinds; Coating: None (clear glass); No outside shading. N Wall 192 sq.ft. 339 - Wood frame, with sheathing, siding or brick; R-11 3 1/2 in.; none Ceiling 455 sq.ft. 419 - Under ventilated attic; R-44 (14 inch); Dark 0 0 1,584 339 419 2,272 1,469 890 Whole House 1,018 sq.ft. 20,260 3,409 23,669 50,759 (2 tons) HVAC -Calc Residential 4.0 by HVAC Computer Systems Ltd. Load calculations are estimates only, actual loads may vary due to weather and construction differences. 888 736-1101 New Construction Energy Code Compliance Certificate Per NI101.0 Building Certificate. A building certificate shall be posted in a permanently visible location inside the building. The certificate shall be completed by the builder and shall list information and values of components listed in Table N1101.8. Mailing Address of the Dwelling or Dwelling Unit Name of Residential Contractor Date Certificate Posted City MN License Number THERMAL ENVELOPE Insulation Location Below Entire Slab Foundation Wall C Cs0 Perimeter of Slab on Grade Rim Joist (Foundation) Rim Joist (1st Floor+) Type: Check All That Apply RADON SYSTEM ', Passive (No Fan) I111Active (With fan and monometer or other system monitoring device c G co O �o £ U . w w ro Other Please Describe Here ®® ®® reirranimmiumgdui rormommomminm umummummum ocumunorimumum MNomminumons IIIII1111111111111111111111111 inrimffifgr Ceiling, flat Ceiling, vaulted Bay Windows or cantilevered areas Bonus room over garage Describe other insulated areas Type in location: interior exterior or integral Type in location: interior exterior or integral Type in location: interior exterior or integral Windows & Doors Heating or Cooling Ducts Outside Conditioned Spaces Average U -Factor (excludes skylights and one door ) U: Solar Heat Gain Coefficient (SHGC): AL� MECHANICAL SYSTEMS Not applicable, all ducts located in conditioned space R -value Make up Air Select a Type Appliances Fuel Type Heating System Domestic Water Heater Cooling System Not required per mech. c.;:e 6 Manufacturer Model Rating or Size Structure's Calculated Input in BTUS: f;%m Capacity in 0 Gallons: C%li1a iet2 _ !yam 4,,ft-43 Heat Loss:C 47 Efficiency AFUE or HSPF% Output in z Tons: Heat Gain: *S; pit Passive';' Powered Interlocked with exhaust device. Describe: Other, describe: Location of duct or system: ps rig, or= F44 R 68 Cfrn's " round duct OR J j Mechanical Ventilation System " metal duct heating if installed: (e.g. two furnaces or air Combustion Air Select a Type Describe any additional or combined or cooling systems source heat pump with gas back-up furnace): X Not required per mech. code Select Type Passive Heat Recover Ventilator (HRV) Capacity in cfms: Low: High: Other, describe: Energy Recover Ventilator (ERV) Capacity in cfms: Low: High: Location of duct or system: Continuous exhausting fan(s) rated capacity in cfms: Location of fan(s), describe: Le'is'ae77._ /...,‘,/&---1„..-,. Cfm's Capacity continuous ventilation rate in cfms: ,: " round duct OR Total ventilation (intermittent ± continuous) rate in cfms: "7 " metal duct Created by BAM version 052009 Minpesota Riles, Chapter 1346. http://www.revisor.leg.state.mn.us/bin/getpub.php?pubtype=RUL... interlocked and matched to the airflow of the exhaust system, additional makeup air is not required. 6. When a solid fuel appliance is installed in a dwelling constructed prior to 1994, makeup air quantity shall be determined by using IMC Table 501.4.3(3) and shall be supplied according to IMC Section 501.4.2. Exception: If a closed combustion solid fuel burning appliance is installed with combustion air in accordance with the manufacturer's installation instructions, additional makeup air is not required. Exception: Makeup air is not required in Items 1 to 6 when any of the following are demonstrated: 1. A test is performed according to ASTM Standard E1998-99, Standard Guide for Assessing Depressurization -Induced Backdrafting and Spillage from Vented Combustion Appliances, and documentation is provided that the vented combustion appliances continue to operate within established parameters of the test. 2. A test approved by the building official verifies proper operation of vented combustion appliances. Table 501.4.1 Procedure to Determine Makeup Air Quantity for Exhaust Equipment in Dwellings One or multiple power vent or direct vent appliances or no combustion appliancesA One or multiple fan -assisted appliances and power vent or direct vent appliances$ 1. Use the Appropriate Column to a) pressure factor (cfm/sf) 0.15 0.09 b) conditioned. floor area (sf) (including unfinished Estimated House Infiltration (cfm): [la x lb] /57 2. Exhaust Capacity a) continuous exhaust - only ventilation system (cfm) : -/0 basements) One atmo- spherically vented gas or oil appliance or one solid fuel applianceC Multiple atmo- spherically vented gas or oil appliances or solid fuel appliancesD Estimate House Infiltration 0.06 0.03 1. . it 2- Minnesota Rules, Chapter 1346. http: //www.revisor.leg. state.rnn.us/bin/getpub.php?pubtype=RUL... (not applicable to balanced ventilation systems b) clothes dryer 135 135 135 c) 80% of largest exhaust rating (cfm) : (not applicable is electrically d) 80% of next largest exhaust rating (cfm): such as HRV) 135 (o,.�'' if recirculating system or if powered makeup air interlocked and matched to exhaust) not appli- cable (not applicable is electrically Total Exhaust if recirculating system or if powered makeup air interlocked and matched to exhaust) Capacity (cfm)-., [2a+2b+2c+2d] 3. Makeup Air Requirement a) Total Exhaust Capacity (from above) b) Estimated House Infiltration (from 1� above) Makeup Air Quantity (cfm) : [3a - 3b) (if value is negative, no makeup air is needed) 4. For Makeup Air Opening Sizing, refer to Table 501.4.2 A Use this column if there are other than fan -assisted or atmospherically vented gas or oil appliances or if there are no combustion appliances. Use this column if there is one fan -assisted appliance per venting system. Other than atmospherically vented appliances may also be included. C Use this column if there is one atmospherically vented (other than fan -assisted) gas or oil appliance per venting system or one solid fuel appliance. Use this column if there are multiple atmospherically vented gas or oil appliances using a common vent or if there are atmospherically vented gas or oil appliances and solid fuel appliances. Table 501.4.2 11/Q/')(1(V, 1.1') Plt, H 11yfL 1346.6012 MINNESOTA MECHANICAL AND FUEL GAS CODES yAi % th i 0,2 9 900 675 675 450 9.5 950 713 713 475 10 1,000 750 750 500 10.5 1,050 788 788 525 11 1,100 825 825 550 11.5 1,150 863 863 575 12 1,200 900 900 600 12.5 1,250 938 938 625 13 1,300 975 975 650 13.5 1,350 1,013 1,013 675 14 1,400 1,050 1,050 700 14.5 1,450 1,088 1,088 725 15 1,500 1,125 1,125 750 1.5.5 1,550 1,163 1,163 775 16 1,600 1,200 1,200 800 Statutory Authority: MS s 326B.101; 326B.106; 326B.13 History: 34 SR 537 Posted: October 23, 2009 1346.6012 IFGC APPENDIX E, WORKSHEET E -l. IFGC Appendix E, Worksheet E-1 Residential Combustion Air Calculation Method (for Furnace. Boiler, and/or Water Heater in the Same Space) Step 1: Complete vented combustion appliance information. Furnace/Boiler: Draft Hood (Not fan assisted) Water Heater: Draft Hood (Not fan assisted) Fan Assisted & Power Vent Fan Assisted & Power Vent X Direct Vent X Direct Vent Input: G'!.) Btu/hr Input: �Oi° ' Btu/hr Copyright 02009 by the Revisor of Statutes, State of Minnesota. All Rights Reserved. 93 MINNESOTA MECHANICAL AND FUEL GAS CODES 1346.6012 Step 2: Calculate the volume of the Combustion Appliance Space (CAS) containing combustion appliances. The CAS includes all spaces connected to one another by code compliant openings. CAS volume: ft3 Step 3: Determine Air Changes per Hour (ACH)' Default ACH values have been incorporated into Table E-1 for use with Method 4b (KAIR Method). If the year of construction or ACH is not known, use method 4a (Standard Method). Step 4: Determine Required Volume for Combustion Air. 4a. Standard Method Total Btu/hr input of all combustion appliances (DO NOT COUNT DIRECT VENT APPLIANCES) Input: 0 Btu/hr Use Standard Method column in Table E-1 to find Total Required Volume (TRV) TRV:0 ft3 If CAS Volume (from Step 2) is greater than TRV then no outdoor openings are needed. If CAS Volume (from Step 2) is less than TRV then go to STEP 5. 4b. Known Air Infiltration Rate (KAIR) Method Total Btu/hr input of all fan -assisted and power vent appliances (DO NOT COUNT DIRECT VENT APPLIANCES) Input: 0 Btu/hr Use Fan -Assisted Appliances column in Table E-1 to find Required Volume Fan Assisted (RVFA) RVFA: 0 ft3 Total Btu/hr input of all non -fan -assisted appliances Input: O Btu/hr Use Non -Fan -Assisted Appliances column in Table E-1 to find Required Volume Non -Fan -Assisted (RVNFA) RVNFA: 0 ft3 Total Required Volume (TRV) = RVFA + RVNFA RV = + If CAS Volume (from Step 2) is greater than IRV then no outdoor openings are needed. If CAS Volume (from Step 2) is less than 1RV then go to STEP 5. Copyright 02009 by the Revisor of Statutes, State of Minnesota. All Rights Reserved. ft3 1346.6012 MINNESOTA MECHANICAL AND FUEL GAS CODES 94 Step 5: Calculate the ratio of available interior volume to the total required volume. Ratio = CAS Volume (from Step 2) divided by TRV (from Step 4a or Step 4b) Ratio = Step 6: Calculate Reduction Factor (RF). RF = 1 minus Ratio RF = 1 - Step 7: Calculate single outdoor opening as if all combustion air is from outside. Total Btu/hr input of all Combustion Appliances in the same CAS (EXCEPT DIRECT VENT) Combustion Air Opening Area (CAOA): Total Btu/hr divided by 3000 Btu/hr per in2 Input: 0 Btu/hr CAOA = /3000 Btu/hr per in2 = in2 Step 8: Calculate Minimum CAOA. Minimum CAOA = CAOA multiplied by RF Minimum CAOA = Step 9: Calculate Combustion Air Opening Diameter (CAOD) int CAOD = 1.13 multiplied by the square root of Minimum CAOA CAOD = 1.13 Minimum CAOA = in 'If desired; ACH can be detemlined using ASHRAE calculation or blower door test. Follow procedures in Section G304. Statutory Authority: MS s 326B.101; 326B.106; 326B.13 History: 34 SR 537 Copyright 02009 by the Revisor of Statutes, State of Minnesota. All Rights Reserved. 95 MINNESOTA MECHANICAL AND FUEL GAS CODES 1346.6014 Posted: October 23. 2009 1346.6014 IFGC APPENDIX E, TABLE E-1. IFGC Appendix E, Table E-1 Residential Combustion Air Required Volume (Required Interior Volume Based on Input Rating of Appliances) Known Air Infiltration Rate (KAIR) Method (ft3) Fan Assisted Non -Fan -Assisted Standard Input Rating Method (Btu/hr) (ft3} 1994' to Present Pre 19942 1994' to Present Pre 19942 0 0 0 5,000 250 375 188 525 263 10,000 500 750 375 1,050 525 15,000 750 1,125 563 1,575 788 20,000 1,000 1,500 750 2,100 1,050 25,000 1,250 1,875 938 2,625 1,313 30,000 1,500 2,2501,125 3,150 1,575 35,000 1,750 2,625 1;313 3,675 1,838 40,000 2,000 3,0001,500 4,200 2,100 45,000 2,250 3,3751,688 4,725 2,363 50,000 2,.500 3,750 1,875 5,250 2,625 55,000 2,750 4,125 2.063 5,775 2,888 60,000 3,000 4,500 2,250 6,300 3,150 65,000 3,250 4,875 2,438 6,825 3,413 70,000 3,500 5,250 2,625 7,350 3,675 75.000 3,750 5,625 2,813 7.875 3,938 80,000 4,000 6,000 3,000 8,400 4,200 85,000 4,250 6,375 3,1888,925 4,463 90,000 4,500 6,750 3,375 9,450 4.725 95,000 4,750 7,125 3,563 9,975 4,988 100,000 5,000 7.500 3,750 10.500 5,250 Copyright ©2009 by the Revisor of Statutes. State of Minnesota. All Rights Reserved. 1346.6014 .MINNESOTA MECHANICAL AND FUEL GAS CODES 96 105,000 5;250 7;875 3;938 11;025 5;513 110;000 5,500 8,250 4,125 11;550 5,775 11.5,000 5,750 8,625 4;313 12,075 6,038 120,000 6,000 9;000 4,500 12;600 6,300 125,000 6,250 9,375 4,688 13,125 6,563 130,000 6,500 9,750 4,875 13,650 6,825 135,000 6,750 10,125 5,063 14,175 7,088 140;000 7..000 10,500 5,250 14,700 7,350 145;000 7;250 10,875 5,438 15,225 7,613 150,000 7,500 11,250 5;625 15,750 7,875 155,000 7,750 11,625 5,813 16,275 8,138 160,000 8000 12,000 6,000 16,800 8;400 165,000 8;250 12,375 6;188 17,325 8,663 170,000 8;500 12;750 6,375 17,850 8,925 175;000 8,750 13,125 6,563 18;375 9;188 180,000 9,000 13,500 6,750 18,900 9,450 185,000 9,250 13,875 6,938 19,425 9,713 190,000 9,500 14,250 7;125 19;950 9,975 195,000 9,750 14,625 7,313 20,475 10,238 200;000 10,000 15;000 7;500 21,000 10,500 205,000 10,250 15,375 7,688 21;525 10,763 210;000 10,500 15,750 7,875 22,050 11,025 215,000 10,750 16,125 8;063 22,575 11,288 220,000 11,000 16,500 8,250 23,100 11;550 225,000 11;250 16,875 8,438 23,625 11,813 230,000 11,500 17,250 8,625 24,150 12,075 'The 1994 date refers to dwellings constructed under the 1994 Minnesota Energy Code. The default KAIR used in this section of the table is 0.20 ACH. 2This section of the table is to be used for dwellings constructed prior to 1994. The default KAIR used in this section of the table is 0.40 ACH. Statutory Authority: MS s 326B.101; 326B.106; 326B.13 History: 34 SR 537 Posted: October 23, 2009 Copyright ©2009 by the Revisor of Statutes, State of Minnesota. All Rights Reserved. •J : II H-0 Jo�,! �. tio) b( -0 A) 0 ^, YCL WOOD v,Crt w Gr�n) ITj N- m 111f100 N3dSV CO CO CO CO CO CO IV IV IV IV /V W m m CO N OVD w ✓ co N co co W co w U. 1331:11S 31dVIN I 0 - .44 CO W 71i -n-- OAK STREET F rH 1169 1165 1181 �—� 1157 --� 1153 h 1149 1145 1141 1137 1133 1129 i i i i pip Sip i Oo A O CO N00°23'49"E 666.26 1168 1164 1160 1158 1152, 1148 1144 1140 1136 1132 1128, 11:11100 N3dSV COW IV IV CO IV (LEXINGTON AVENUE) COUNTYSTATE AID HIGHWAY NO. 43 1331:11S )IVO s Vd ss ssiss s 000//1 -LION 4,1'° City of Eapi Mike Maguire Mayor Paul Bakken Cyndee Fields Gary Hansen Meg Tilley Council Members Thomas Hedges City Administrator Municipal Center 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55122-1810 651.675.5000 phone 651.675.5012 fax 651.454.8535 TDD Maintenance Facility 3501 Coachman Point Eagan, MN 55122 651.675.5300 phone 651.675.5360 fax 651.454.8535 TDD www.cityofeagan.com The Lone Oak Tree The symbol of strength and growth in our community. July 20, 2012 Jason Barrett CBS Construction Services Inc 11124 Zealand Avenue North Champlin, MN 55316 CC: Roger Purdy LHB 250 Third Ave N, Suite 450 Minneapolis MN 55401 RE: Northwood Family Townhomes Dear Jason: We have started our review of the construction documents submitted in pursuit of obtaining a building permit for the above -referenced project. This review is not intended to be an exhaustive and comprehensive report. Unless otherwise noted, all references are to the 2006 I.B.C. It is our goal that this review will help you in complying with the applicable codes and we are, therefore, requesting that the following items be addressed: 1. Does the engineered building design include compliance with Sections 2308.3 or 2308.12.4 for braced wall lines? Please include a construction note on sheet S1.00 that addresses the question concerning the requirement(s). 2. Framing plan note #4 on sheet S1.00 shows a symbol that would indicate the locations of point loads. Please designate all point load locations on the plans using that symbol. 3. Rated horizontal separations shall be supported by walls that are protected to the same degree. 4. Provide documentation that shows compliance with the Energy Code. Reference Section N1101.1, Chapter 1322 of the MSBC (2009 Energy Code). Each type of unit shall show compliance with the requirements. 5. Provide a detail that will show compliance with Section AF 103.6.2 of Chapter 1322 MSBC (radon vent piping). An alternative was discussed in the pre plan review meeting on 7/19/12. 6. Attic draft stopping shall extend through overhangs. This may be the case, but it was unclear to me when looking at the plans. (Section 717.4 2006 IBC) 7. Provide fire stopping submittals for any and all types of membrane and through penetration in the rated assemblies. 8. The accessible kitchen range/stove controls shall be on the front panel. 9. Per Section 1106.2 of the 2006 IBC, two percent, but not less than one, of each type of parking space provide for occupancies in R-2, which are required to have accessible Type A or Type B dwelling units, shall be accessible. The City interprets this to say that one of the garages of the accessible units shall accessible. This would mean that the vertical clearance would be required to be a minimum of 98", and the minimum width of the garage parking space with an access aisle space would be 16 ft. 10. Provide a detail for the accessible parking signage. 11. Access aisles adjacent to the accessible parking space are required to be designated "No Parking." 12. Provide details of the proposed sump pit(s) and how they connect to the drain tile system. 13. Please resubmit plans (two sets) with the revisions discussed in this letter and all of the addendums that are currently in the project manual. Thank you in advance for your attention to these items. If you have any questions concerning this letter, please contact me at (651) 675-5683 or cnovaczyk@cityofeagan.com. Sincerely, Craig Novaczyk Senior Building Inspector Cc: Dale Schoeppner, Chief Building Official Protect Name Location Special Structural Testing and inspection Program Summary Schedule Akay1%(Aro �r-7R41f/4 4"0 IV Cextrn?y Q r1 Avt' is `/1 4..'r ced A4,t4--4-i a46/o .4 YNrr*'; O7,4 1 Technical (2) Type of Specific Report Sectio�n/ ' Article Description} (3) Inspector. (4)_._ �, Frequency (5) /16,6 Z Qr�,f'�7/j.crs repNe eeM�/L'�' Si.' .- S i (t rtOe 1 C f� Protect No _� Permit No (1) . �o Calor cr,4�, ,.:.. _ .. e;re Ill 515"'":4,'lr per•eoarFc j7 0121.7 X41 r 4 s7s , G est J1LY.Z Perts4f.G Assigned Firm (G) 44,44 -fru4' se. s 1 S" — s Note This schedule shall be filled out and included in a Special Structural Testing and Inspection Program. (If not otherwise specified, assumed program will be "Guidelines for Special Inspection & Testing' as contained in the State Building Code and as modified by the state adopted IBC.) 'A complete specification -ready program can be downloaded directly by visiting CASE/MN at ww,,v cecm.org' (1) Pennrt No to be provided by the Building Official (2) Referenced to the specific technical scope section in the program. (3) Use descriptions per IBC Chapter 17, as adopted by Minnesota State Building Code. (4) Special Inspector -Technical (SIT); Special Inspector -Structural (SIS) (5) Weekly, monthly, per test`inspectton, per floor. etc. (6) Name of Firm contracted to perform services. Owner Contractor Architect' SER: Le SI -S. TA- F. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS (Each appropriate representat::ve shall sign below) Firm; � 'S-a�i\Vt_k 9 n� Date: 8 � 6 ( \a Firm CBS . "S�`.lit4C Date r 20j Firm: �i It � . Date 'L Firm: LHB, Inc. Date: gf 8112 Firm: Tc ite- -c o / Date: ,= 'rb Z Firmc r re Firm: Date: a1`i' /z - Date: if requested by engineerlarchitect of record or building official, the individual names of all prospective special Inspectors and tete work they intend to observe shall be identified as an attachment. Legend. SER = Structural Engineer of Record SI -T = Special Inspector - Technical TA = Testing Agency SI -S = Special Inspector - Structural F - Fabricator Accepted for rte Buitdrng Department By Data nut CBS SCoervicesstrcIncion. 30 August 2012 Dale Schoeppner Chief Building Official City of Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55122 Mr. Schoeppner, 11124 Zealand Ai'e. No. • Chnmpli i. MX 553I6 • 763 69-4020 • Fax 763-569-41 17 I write to summarize my efforts, on behalf of CBS Construction Services, Inc. (Contractor) and the Dakota County CDA (Owner), to establish a budget for Building Permit Fees related to our project, Northwood Family Townhomes, in your city. The project consists of Nine (9) separate structures, where each structure is composed of multiple dwelling units. As such, these multi -family housing structures are classified in terms of use/occupancy as "Residential" (IBC 2006, Section 302.1), with R-2 Occupancy Group dwelling units. Each structure has a single sewer and water service, which is shared by the multiple dwelling units in that structure. The project property is undivided (PID: 10-52177-01-020), so that all nine buildings are located on the same property with no property lines either between dwelling units or between buildings. Therefore, per my conversation with Beth Diem and Jerry Norman at the MN Dept. of Labor & Industry, the dwelling units are not technically "townhomes". Rather, each of the multi -family structures is technically an "apartment building," and each of the dwelling units is an "apartment," despite the fact that each has separate means of egress and access to exterior yard space on two sides. In preparing our bid for this publicly bid project, we included a budget amount for building permit fees. Because each municipality differs slightly (or can) in the way building permits are handled, including the fees that are applied, and because it was not evident from the City of Eagan's website how the building permits/fees for this project would be handled, I called the City of Eagan on May 22, 2012 and spoke to a building inspector/plan reviewer in the Building Inspections department, asking how the building permit fee should be calculated for this project. After providing a summary of the project, I was told that a separate building permit fee should be calculated for each of nine buildings, per the permit fee schedule published on the city's website. On the day of the bid, May 30, 2012, another CBS employee, Jon Borchardt, who was helping to prepare the bid, called the city with the same question, just to be sure that we were calculating the fees correctly. Jon spoke to a man in the Building Inspections department and asked for help in calculating the permit fee for this project. Jon was given the same direction that I had been given. Per the City of Eagan's Building Permit Fee Schedule, calculated the permit fee as follows: Building '1 tie With Integrity Estimated Totaf PruJeLt Valuation. $5,127, Average Valuation of Each of the (9) Buildings: $569,667 Base Fee Calculation per Building: $3,456.75 for the first $500,000, $5/each additional $1,000. Thus, for each Building, valued at $569,667: $3,456.75 for the first $500,000 Plus $5 for each additional $1,000 ($5 x 69 = $345) Base Fee = $3,801.75/Building x (9) buildings = Total Project Base Fee: $34,215.75 Plan Review Fees: 65% of Base Fee: .65 x $3,801.75 = $2,471.14 for the first building. (Because the building plans are similar, the remaining eight (8) buildings should incur a reduced plan review fee rate of 25% of the Base Fee, per City of Eagan 25% of Base Fee: .25 x $3,801.75 = $950.44 per each similar building plan = $950.44 x (8) buildings = $7,603.52 Total Project Plan Review Fees: ($2,471.14 + $7,603.52) = $10,074.66 Surcharge per Building: .0005 x Building Valuation of $569,667 = $284.83 per building = $284.83 x (9) buildings = $2,563.47 Total of the Base Fees, plus the Plan Review Fees, plus the Surcharges is: $46,853.88 With respect to the addressing, the question was raised in our plan review meeting how each of the dwelling units were to be identified. Two options were presented: (1) Each building could receive a separate street address, and each of the units could be identified by the building address plus a unit number or letter. For example, the units in Building #9, as identified on the site plan, would be identified as "3274 Aspen Court, Unit A" and so on. (2) Each unit could receive a separate street address. The city plan reviewer, the owner, and the architect agreed that separate street addresses would be "cleanest" or easiest for keeping track of inspections. At that time, no mention was made of the need to provide separate building permits for each unit if addressed separately. My understanding of addressing, per my conversation with the MN DoLl, is that each dwelling/apartment unit can be addressed separately with no consequence to the issuance of building permits (again, because the dwelling units do not have separate water/sewer services and cannot be sold separately as townhomes). Ridding ihtlnf' 1t'ii1r lntegr A In conclusion, because the C ty-of-Eagan has elected to require f• - • . . - • I • : • - , the total cost of the permit fees greatly exceeds the amount budgeted per my calculations (above). As CBS is unable to bear this additional unforeseen cost, I request that the (48) building permit applications submitted for this project be discarded. I am prepared to submit new building permit applications, one for each of the nine (9) buildings. However, if the City of Eagan can administer the building permit applications already on file so as to consolidate them per building, and so reduce the number of permits to nine (9), project time and staff labor may be saved. Please let me know, as I can submit the new permit applications today. Thank you very much for your time and consideration of this urgent matter. Sincerely, Jason Barrett Vice President &tacit!t 4ctictc t6'it(t Intcc I Craig Novaczyk From: Jason Barrett [jason@cbsconstruct.com] Sent: Monday, August 20, 2012 5:25 PM To: ksaxton@j-berd.com; DSherwood@j-berd.com; Craig Novaczyk; roger.purdy@lhbcorp.com; Anne Ryan Cc: brad; Greg Peterson; Kari Gill Subject: FW: Northwood Townhomes - Permit Status Attachments: bam-certificate.pdf All, I am following up on the energy calcs required by the City of Eagan. I apologize for the following questions, but the particular building permit requirements for our project, which is being handled as a Residential/Commercial hybrid, are new to me, and I want to be sure we get the right documents submitted in the next day or two. 1. Are we to use the BAM Field Guide (http://www.bamn.org/fieldguide-all.pdf )and Compliance Form (attached) for the energy calcs. required by the City for our building permits? 2. If not, does the City of Eagan have their own guide and form that should be followed? 3. If the attachments are applicable, does J-Berd need to get the non-mechanical information that is included on the attached form from LHB (or from contract docs) in order to complete their portions? 4. Do we need to provide an energy calc for each separate unit, or for each unit type, or only for each building? We are looking to start foundation work this week in order to keep the contracted schedule. Please let me know what is needed. Thank you, Jason Barrett Project Manager CBS Construction Services, Inc. 11124 Zealand Avenue N Champlin, MN 55316 (763) 569-4020 Office (763) 569-4117 Fax (612) 369-0965 Mobile Jason@cbsconstruct.com From: Craig Novaczyk[mailto:CNovaczyk@cityofeagan.com] Sent: Friday, August 17, 2012 7:12 AM To: 'Roger J. Purdy'; Jason Barrett Cc: 'Greg Peterson' (GregPeterson@dakotacda.state.mn.us); 'Kari Gill' (KariGill@dakotacda.state.mn.us) Subject: RE: Northwood Townhomes - Permit Status To all concerned, Just to clarify, my conversation with Roger: Once we receive the fire stopping assemblies and the special inspections and testing schedule (received this morning) we will be able to release the individual permits (47). One SAC unit will be assigned to each of the 47 permits. The office permit will be issued separately because we will need a separate SAC determination from the Met Council for this space. The mechanical and plumbing permits will be automatically issued with the building permits, however, no inspections 1 (with exceptions to footing and foundation) will be scheduled prior to us receiving the energy calcs for review, and we are satisfied that everything is compliant. The City doesn't issue the electrical permits, they will be issued by the State Electrical Board when the electrician submits them for review. Thank you in advance for your attention to these items, Craig Craig Novaczyk I Senior Building Inspector I City of Eagan City Hall 13830 Pilot Knob Road I Eagan, MN 55122 I (651) 675-5683 I (651) 675-5694 (Fax) I cnovaczyk(c�citvofeagan.com City of Eapil THIS COMMUNICATION MAY CONTAIN CONFIDENTIAL AND/OR OTHERWISE PROPRIETARY MATERIAL and is thus for use only by the intended recipient. If you received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the e-mail and its attachments from all computers. From: Roger J. Purdy[mailto:Roger.Purdy@Ihbcorp.coml Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2012 6:05 PM To: Jason Barrett (Jason@cbsconstruct.com) Cc: 'Greg Peterson'(GregPeterson@dakotacda.state.mn.us); 'Kari Gill'(KariGill@dakotacda.state.mn.us); Craig Novaczyk Subject: Northwood Townhomes - Permit Status Jason —Just a few quick notes per my conversation with Craig Novaczyk today. - Buildings will be permitted by unit (i.e. 47 separate permits PLUS a permit for the office) The 47 unit permits have been prepared and will be issued when the Energy calcs and Firestopping submittals have been submitted. - Energy Calcs —The examples I sent the other day are not sufficient. J-berd will need to submit the actual calculations they did to size the equipment, "IFGC Appendix E", "IMC Table 501.4.1" and the "New Construction Energy Code Compliance Certificate" (N1101.8) (See Attachment — "New Single Family Dwelling..."). These can be submitted by J-berd at the time of their mechanical permit application. The Building permit and the mechanical and electrical permits will be issued at the same time so no inspections will take place until the energy calcs are submitted and accepted. - Firestopping —The City will need to have all firestopping submittals including the assembly number for each type penetration. I'll review these first and send them on to Craig. Anything you can do to get these in right away is going to help. These will be required for a permit. SAC/WAC —These have been computed for the units but not the office. Do you or Kari have the invoice? Roger Purdy, LEED AP — Construction Administrator 250 Third Avenue North, Suite 450, Minneapolis, MN 55401 Direct 612.752.6957 1 Cell 612.239.2856 LHBcorp.com LHB, Inc. J PERFORMANCE DRIVEN DESIGN. 2 250 Third Avenue North, Ste 450 Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401 612-338-2029 Fax 612 338-2088 www.LHBcorp.com 3 August 2012 Craig Novaczyk Senior Building Inspector 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55122 NORTHWOOD FAMILY TOWNHOMES PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS - RESPONSE Dear Mr. Novaczyk, AUG 0 3 2012 Please see below for responses to your review comments letter dated 20 July 2012. 1. The building complies with 2308.3, note clarifying this has been added to framing plan notes on sheet S 1.00 in ASI -5. Also see ASI -5 and PR -3 for short wall portal framing locations and details. 2. Point loads will be indicated on framing plans, see ASI -5. 3. All walls supporting garage ceilings are shown as 1 hr. rated assemblies. All materials in these locations will comply with Section 406.4.1 of IBC. 4. Mechanical system is Design -Build. Compliance with applicable Energy Code will be documented in mechanical submission made by contractor at time of permit application. 5. Note #( on the foundation plan notes on sheet S 1.00 calls for radon venting through the footings, the marks indicating the locations were left off of the foundation plans. These have been added in ASI -5 6. The extent of the draftstop is clarified in ASI -5. A note has been added to the roof plans on Sheets A1.10 -A1.80: "Draftstops shall extend beyond exterior wall to eave fascia." 7. We copy you on fire stopping submittal once it is reviewed by LHB. 8. Please refer to Section 11 3100 2.01 D. Ranges at accessible units are to have up- front accessible controls. 9. A new unit Type E was created in building 7 to include a van accessible parking space in the garage. Please refer to PR- 3. 10. A detail for parking signage was provided on L5.0. Please refer to PR -3. 11. Aisles will be painted and signed "No Parking." Curb ramps with detectable warning strips have been added. Please refer to PR -3. Duluth, MN Minneapolis, MN Northwood Family Townhomes code review comments Page 2 August 3, 2012 12. Alternate # 1 including foundation/footing drainage and sumps is deleted and Contract will be amended. 13. To maintain continuity of fire protection per 708.4, Detail 2/A4.42 is revised. Add 1 layer 5/8" Type 'X' gypsum board to each side of continuous rim board at Unit Separation wall/floor ceiling. Please refer to PR -3. Please let me know if you have any questions or need further clarifications. Best Regards, Anne Ryan AIA, Project Architect LHB Attachments: ASI -5, PR -3 c: Jason Barret, CBS Kim Bretheim, LHB Roger Purdy, LHB Kari Gill, CDA Greg Peterson, CDA LHB File #080110.00 Duluth, MN Minneapolis, MN LHB 250 Third Avenue North, Ste 450 Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401 612 338-2029 Fax 612 338-2088 www.LHBcorp.com ARCHITECT'S SUPPLEMENTAL INSTRUCTION (ASI) DATE: July 24, 2012 ASI NO.: Five ( 5 ) PROJECT: Northwood Family Townhomes LHB PROJECT NO.: 080110 OWNER: Northwood Family Housing Limited Partnership Dakota County CDA CONTRACTOR: CBS Construction Services 11124 Zealand Ave. North Champlin, MN 55316 ARCHITECT: LHB 250 Third Avenue North, Ste 450 Minneapolis, MN 55401 CONTRACT FOR: General Construction The following work shall be provided in accordance with the Contract Documents and these Supplemental Instructions. The Contractor acknowledges that by proceeding with the Work, there will be no change to the Contract Sum or the Contract Time. Reason for Change: ❑ Owner Request ❑ Unforeseen Condition ® Code Interpretation ❑ Other 1. Refer to Roof Plans on sheets A1.10 thru A1.80. Add the following note: Draftstops shall extend beyond exterior wall to eave fascia. 2. Refer to Structural General Notes on Sheet S 1.00: Add note #8 to framing plans notes as follows: The engineered building design complies with the requirements of section 2308.3 of the IBC. 3. Refer to foundation plans on sheets S1.10, S 1.20, S 1.30, S 1.40, S 1.50, S 1.60, and S 1.70. Show locations for foundation penetrations for radon system per note #9 - Foundation Plan Notes on sheet S 1.00. 4. Refer to unit plans on Sheet 52.10: Revise beam and header locations to match architectural wall layout, add posts per note 4 — Framing Plans Notes on Sheet S 1.00, add reference to portal framing detail 13/S4.10 at garage walls See PR3 for portal frame detail. Attachments: Sheets S1.10, S1.20, S1.30, S1.40, S1.50, S1.60, S1.70, and S2.10 all dated 07/24/12 Issued By: LHB c: LHB file -F408 M:\O8Proj\080110\ADMN\F400 Construction\F408 ASI FO\ASI 5 - Extentof draftstop\080110 NorthwoodFamilyTownhomes ASI 5_072412.docx Duluth, MN Minneapolis, MN 9| ad 0 O 00 0 EI 02,L DOUSUL MI 40 C.' 40 4®_ 4 46 4� r 40 01 40 Y o ✓ L__ ✓ -- 40 L_ 40 11 I'1 %i f F %i,L c101S tlOIS 4E 4� LL IF S O n O 0 WV y�weeyxaZ�siuH. io woN o�toegiiSNiN!wypaw-.wary ou oLLoemsouwool +aeuo 9| 0 MIZE Oe LOVA. �5 i oww w $ - Y00 o o o-±- =-.. J� 8 a£ 0 r4 0 if. EC. n �a a - Q xEs ro9 =' �a 8 I , LL o ce 2 O aZ –Iz O ou) og Z Q y=LL [00,5 •',: a <g mgr CO Cl) 2yg e a NI O Nir .3°i � -•;,- 's44/ ♦ "0- -N, 0j3! s• b gb s4°°OOe®0is°0oa 10°`JOO°Oa°°o°°° .°0O0°s000♦o°o•o .. on * sass ANI. { 1/ o s .,!msesso°sioos1l00 o°a�:44:4sso 0• r 0 ° _ _ I r° 4 , ...• .soosOr°r•i I _.i ._._®ni AIN 1111111 I • 4D o y 4D 1 4D o, 4® o 0 A E b °L= , o oLz b �,z o AL o AL / s,;, o S S s LL .e .eL AL -.LL zIL9 o .,,s -.LL .zn9 .4t .U4s .6 zrL9 6 .uL9 VL UL .4t 2rV o4 .B ,BULL Zl 209 b Www 8 e ' r E 4®'j ` [ I � Imo] O£ �l' 4D 41 I� y 4D 1 o t`Y� 9 oer I a -� 4 CID � I[F r g" r 1 M1 1/ ti 0 i I– ,3 w 1 I I ) EI _ It=r I I4�o I ll. �' 1 I— 1=1 � 1IIS NII I j r 4�b 1 r-- - w 1 b { I$- I r--- , Iz I w _ � jl – >-`-- O I i ".-5 ;1 -:ii 1 C I ( I� 7 rl I I I1111D I d I I I � I _ x z"E ®®I n s s uLLL e eL .o, Lac eJ'.ar,o s a k �L. a zit 0000 _.=,L o0 AL AL= O O -04z O ALz O ALz , O ! o o 0 � o =,L 0 0 I, W.V.rszls H.........ou oL moms M.... ..1,ouo,40130 .I. iLan. weev,w z,s HNowciPOO.WON o4.wepzis HiMwPAPOCU wgy ae1oem%aiiiew11 .u� 0,1 \\ COj Cl_ } 0§ D40 ssnakorvo *MM. 2101211L•2102-20,24 1114,14 Oi 41 Z10215, L4.414,64s-z 4s ,444,4444,4400,411114 toecnas141111114111J1/001414.4 174410814148011J One.] 250 Third Avenue North, Ste 450 Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401 612-338-2029 Fax 612 338-2088 www.LHBcorp.com DATE: July 25, 2012 PROJECT: Northwood Family Townhomes OWNER: Northwood Family Housing Limited Partnership Dakota County CDA CONTRACTOR: CBS Construction Services 11124 Zealand Ave. North Champlin, MN 55316 PROPOSAL REQUEST PROPOSAL REQUEST NO.: Three (3) LHB PROJECT NO.: 080110 ARCHITECT: LHB 250 Third Avenue North Suite 450 Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401 CONTRACT FOR: General Construction Please submit an itemized cost for changes in the Contract Sum and Contract Time for proposed modifications to Contract Documents. Submit your cost within five days, or notify Architect of the date you anticipate submitting your proposal. This is not a change order or a direction to proceed with the work described in the proposed modifications. Description of Proposed Change: 1. PR 3-1: Add 1 layer 5/8" Type 'X' gypsum board to each side of continuous rim board at Unit Separation wall/floor ceiling. See PRO3.01 for revised detail 2/A4.42. Changes to price of work Subcontractor cost $ Markup (commission) $ Contractor Labor $ Contractor Materials $ OH&P $ Add/Deduct Total $ (circle one) Does Proposed Change involve a change in Contract Time? ❑ No ❑ Yes (Increased) (Decreased) _ days. Attachments: PRO3.01- DETAIL 2/A4.42 -REVISED Duluth, MN Minneapolis, MN 2. PR 3-2: Delete Alternate no. 1 and provide credit to the Owner for work associated with footing/foundation drain tile and sumps. Detail 7/A5.10 is not used. Changes to price of work Subcontractor cost $ Markup (commission) $ Contractor Labor $ Contractor Materials $ OH&P $ Add/Deduct Total $ (circle one) Does Proposed Change involve a change in Contract Time? ❑ No ['Yes (Increased) (Decreased) _ days. 3. PR 3-3: Refer to Sheet S4.10: Add portal frame detail for short walls at garages, see revised unit plans on Sheet 52.10 (see ASI -5) for locations. Changes to price of work Subcontractor cost $ Markup (commission) $ Contractor Labor $ Contractor Materials $ OH&P $ Add/Deduct Total $ (circle one) Does Proposed Change involve a change in Contract Time? ❑ No ['Yes (Increased) (Decreased) days. Attachments: 54.10 dated 07/25/12 4. PR 3-4: Refer to Sheet L1.0: Accessible parking spaces are relocated as shown. Provide pricing for the following: Accessible parking signage (2), access aisles painted and signed "No Parking" and added curb ramps with detectable warning strips at access aisles. See Sheets L1.0 and L5.0. Changes to price of work Subcontractor cost $ Markup (commission) $ Contractor Labor $ Contractor Materials $ OH&P $ Add/Deduct Total $ (circle one) Does Proposed Change involve a change in Contract Time? ❑ No ❑ Yes (Increased) (Decreased) _ days. Attachments: L1.0 and L5.0. 5. PR 3-5: Revise accessible end unit in Building 7 to accommodate accessible van parking in garage. Garage door shall be 10' wide by 8'- 2" high. Refer to Sheet A1.94 for new unit Type E. Duluth, MN Minneapolis, MN Changes to price of work Subcontractor cost $ Markup (commission) $ Contractor Labor $ Contractor Materials $ OH&P $ Add/Deduct Total $ (circle one) Does Proposed Change involve a change in Contract Time? ❑ No ❑ Yes (Increased) (Decreased) days. Attachments: A1.60, A1.94 (new sheet) and A2.06 6. PR 3-6: Refer to Sheet S1.60: Revise foundation and roof framing plans for building & unit E to accommodate wider garage for handicapped access. Changes to price of work Subcontractor cost $ Markup (commission) $ Contractor Labor $ Contractor Materials $ OH&P $ Add/Deduct Total $ (circle one) Does Proposed Change involve a change in Contract Time? ❑ No ❑ Yes (Increased) (Decreased) _ days. Attachments: $4S1.60 dated 07/25/12 Request By: Construction Administrator M: 108Proj10801101ADMNIF400 Constr\F410 Prop Rgsts1080110PR3_Code.Doc Duluth, MN Minneapolis, MN SEP WALL-FLOOR/CEILING AT UNIT TO UNIT -REV. 3" = 1-0" WALL BASE - SEE FINISH SCHEDULE VAPOR BARRIER CONT. SEALANT & BACKER ROD FLOORING - SEE FINISH SCHEDULE SELF-ADHESIVE FLASHING APPLIED TO SUBFLOOR AND BRIDGING AIR GAP 518" TYP.'X' GYP. BD. BETWEEN JOISTS SPRAY FOAM INSULATION TRUSS RIBBON OR CONTINUOUS RIM BD. FLOOR JOIST - SEE STRUCTURAL FIRE SAFING INSULATION ELECTRICAL WIRE (WHERE PRESENT) VAPOR BARRIER - FOLD DOWN WALL & TAPE TO WALL VAPOR BARRIER CONTINUOUS SEALANT LOW EXPANSION SPRAY FOAM INSULATION AT ALL PENETRATIONS THROUGH PLATE VAPOR BARRIER PERFORMANCE DRIVEN DESIGN. LHBcerp.cem 250 3rd Ave. N, Ste 4501 Minneapofs, MN 55401 1612.338.2029 CLIENT NAME: Northwood Family Housing Limited Partnership DWG': 2/A4.42 -REVISED TITLE NAMEECTNorthwood Family Townhomes FILE: 080110 DRAWN BY: Author CHECKED BY: Checker PROJ. NO: 080110 DRAWING NO: PRO3.01 COPYRIGHT 2012 BY LHB, INC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. s Mdnneapd¢. MN 55W1 612338.202 CVZ Cw IJ 7222-6 SITE LAYOUT PLAN 0 J EP 'ON (V41H3IH Civ 3,LV,LS /,LNI103 11111_111111: 11111+ 01 -Mi Ln 0 O RAL BUILDING PLAN OZ e 0 0- M M 6 Lai 2 EA 20 0 7.4 J �1 Y rr3ri to zi - m,,�z 3 ziie rz ) E 3 ®A 3 lirBr �.r„s-#.r,s- 4 sis a ,oIMl �1.>,ai .u: or t.�- 3s,oE as e-, -.Et As E .e-. t �y� <.a -..i a. eAa - Wmo — 0 e Q 0 m m 49 oW W m rum Rini o o ill ,� �i��I �� I �CF • � I IEJ 1.�� .u] �r� �I 1 0 �i111111 Fri: p t c 11 CD I IoM _Q = 11M3- ❑©� eon IlkralCD- r. l I limo VARall I IV I ��I I01gl f d , A m �z, a A �r �z6-.azna.a z . aE a cc Z J Or 0 0. CC I - z s LL C) z G S 0011000 111111111111 1111111111111111 z2 4 �Va � a Ow a >e ao3 do W O a ora ra o "a -.� U= �� LLW z� ods �� Q®tea r r SW cs m w a v n " ` g€s �" pv n m` _ ,..� 8 �awxUO a ,. 3 Oco ° Ul pA =0 o O ZZ 05 U 0 �Z z� 0 40 CO) Iz pp z as - w �xw W z � Q' ?j€ Z F-0O ii CO..2$2 s's w H i o 3 Yo O or¢ a o ao 8 0 NWIIMMIlra y WiTiarillVr MEW, !IIV H'"T1 .♦oyN► 1 .:bso°eiigi0i♦ys♦• ey♦ii♦i��itii♦�yyi4 .♦1♦♦♦. .♦♦ I - I o.e ® m : yy♦Ao••♦♦.♦♦.♦?� _ -7 ee s.n r- �` f yi♦iyyi♦�`V i sem° -_ 0 a _ kok k = 0 4D o bo-�� yI C� v I— D i 4� o _ 1 �'� (Ill i CS i m e s,s-.,, $ 3 ®a12 -ala-.<< Seo 46 4D 46 g a 4D Ii r a -v J Iii I[ 1 I{t T 1 m l'+ 2IL j ,`, 1\ I 8 1,- I ` m 1r i`,�4�$ I5 -a,B 1 r I I I 4� 1 -I I- 8 1 ��� T �Ii e u 4 rm` I. r 1 1I I .I 1.14$ 1 ° 7 I I1 -1jf[�OEi, 1 V 17 -�I b $ 1I, P n 3 I, �- J` m _'6.`t'9 :_ '' t 'ce o it 1 ILL ��-- 1 4 r. 1 i:� o® 1 [I � 1 lig 11 I \\ o . L' I\ { 1 ....._ JI I� I �/ ..:: I - -- IEI ,�, F� ..._i .y e��� ` r� o O_4! ito �_ ._- ,l <<I-.e a a s ams �. as 9 La a z a a e <<< �z v a h A .a �e n o m 0 Qor .o v.� „v 0,, w.,..55%v�s wiw.5355555115..lamas HIN.,.,,. ,".„ o,ao O RV e4 ZODeee I40 01e11111^0-LIS 1411411,1100.1014101 04 mansleieleeee140011144001 04 tosomlu 1.0-1 mae a tMetropolitan Council Dale Schoeppner Building Official City of Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55122 Dear Mr. Schoeppner: Environmental Services August 23, 2012 The Metropolitan Council Environmental Services (MCES) Division has reviewed the SAC assignment for Northwood Family Housing / Dakota CDA. The original letter for this determination was dated July 24, 2012, letter reference 120724A4. This project is located at 3255 Northwood Circle within the City of Eagan. The City will be charged 48 SAC Units for this project, instead of the 47 units originally assigned. The SAC review is based on updated information. Charges: Retail/Management Office Townhome Building 1= 5 units Building 2 = 4 units Building 3 = 5 units Building 4 = 6 units Building 5 = 5 units Building 6 = 6 units Building 7 = 6 units Building 8 = 4 units Building 9 = 6 units Total = 47 units units @ 1 unit/SAC Unit SAC Units 1.00 47.00 Total Charge: 48.00 The business information was provided to MCES by the applicant at this time. It is the City's responsibility to substantiate the business use and size at the time of the final inspection. If there is a change in use or size, a redetermination will need to be made. If you have any questions, call me at 651-602-1378 or email jessica.nye@metc.state.mn.us. Sincerely, Jessie Nye SAC Program Administrator Environmental Services Division JN:kb: 120823A5 Determination expiration: August 23, 2014 cc: File, MCES Peggy Fleck, Eagan (email) Jason Barrett, CBS Construction (email) www.metrocouncil.org 390 Robert Street North • St. Paul, MN 55101-1805 • (651) 602-1005 • Fax (651) 602-1477 • TTY (651) 291-0904 An Equal Opportunity Employer a 0 n CD 00. O_ C O1 n1 ;‘ c i ',11)% T O W CO 0) 0) U, U, CD CD v 0) O 7 0) 70 < <CTD CT) I-, U'1 01 A N V i..r1 W NJ 00 0 V N CO O O O co O O NJ O Cl lD V LO W NJ 00 01 LO W NJ 00 NJ up W NJ t0 A LC) LO U 1.0 NJ NJ V t0 A 0 LO W NJ V 00 ' 00 00 00 ' CO V W W W W W NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ 01 VI V 01 A N CO 0 Cl NJ V W NJ W 00 V W NJ W A V W NJ ui A V W NJ 1.11 0 V W NJ A 01 Cl I-+ N A N Cl I+ I1 W V Cl I+ N A l0 Cl I- N NJ l0 a� I- N A to l•+ N W W U7 1, N Cl N F-+ N VI V INI N. N 01 1.0 t+ N N W N. N 01 UI I. N A 0 A A A I I+ ': I,I N N N W A NJ Cl 00 00 A r E, A A A r N W NJ N N Cl A r N Cl 0 I I N Cl 00 ! r N N Ui UJI N Cl I. N CO O I I. N V Cl N Ia N 00 A NJ Iv N 00 00 N. F.1 1-1 10 10 N. f.1 1r 1.0 V1 Bldg # Street M 1191 Oak St D -p m 3 re D -p m 3 ..1i D -p m 3 e+ y>>>>>> -p m = et eett - m 7 i -e VI m 7 P D>> 1 -a MI m m m m m 7 3 7 3 7 re Cl�.......... Cl -a m 3 -0 r0 7 D VI fp 3 a D -0 m 3 n > -0 m 3 Cl v 'a hr al '♦3 fD 11"1"3j v fD e '0 rD r. 'O rD rt a1 'O fD rt- Cu '0 (D a1 '23 rD rP al '13 rD r g : al 'a fD ....fit 3 , a) 'C rD rt 0 01 7r e -t 0 a1 7r ,pt 0 al >r ,pp 0 A >r eft 0 al >r M 0 a1 7C ; - 0 Cu 7C 4 0 al >- K 0 Cu : M 0 0 a1 (0 7C >-; .4, ep 0 ; a1 7C -e 0 N 7C -e 0 91 7C K Oak St Oak St Oak St $ 5,239,000.00 VI- N NJ A 0 0 0 b 0 t/1 N NJ A 0 0 0 b 0 in N 0 In 0 0 0 b 0 i/1 N 0 In 0 0 0 b 0 in I-, 0 A 0 0 0 b 0 in ' in : t/1 '. L1 i/1 t/1 I--. 1--. I-. I--.:. N 0 NJ NJ 0 0 N A A A In A :. A 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 b b 0 0 0 b 0 0 0 0 0 0 in I. NJ A 0 0 0 o 0 i/1 N 0 V 0 0 0 b 0 in N 0 to 0 0 0 b 0 ih N 0 A 0 00 0 b 0 in N O A 0 0 b 0 i/1 N NJ A 0 0 0 b 0 i/1 N NJ A 0 0 0 b 0 i/1 N 0 In 0 0 0 b 0 i/1 N 0 In 0 0 0 O 0 in I -I 0 A 0 0 0 b 0 UN I-+ 0 A 0 0 0 o 0 i/1 F. NJ A 0 0 0 O 0 - i/1 I--. NJ A 0 0 0 b 0 in I--. 0 In 0 0 0 0 0 € i/1 I--. 0 U'I 0 00000000 0 0 0 t t/1 I' 0 A 0 0 o 0 i/1 N NJ A 0 0 O 0 in N NJ A 0 0 O 0 in F-. 0 to 0 0 O 0 i/1 N 0 U1 0 0 O 0 in I-. O A 0 0 O 0 t in I-. 0' A 0 0 o 0 ; in I-. NJ A 0 0 0 0 0 in F-. NJ A o 0 0 0 0 , t/1 N 0 In 0 0 0 0 0 , to 1 i/1 I-. N4 0 0 In A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0` 0 0 in F' NJ A 0 0 0 b 0 in N N 0. 0 0 0 0 0 in N 0 In 0 0 0 0 0 i/1 V Cl 0 0 0 0 0 i/1 I-. N A 0 0 0 0 0 in N N A 0 0 0 0 0 in I-4 O sr) 0 0 0 0 0 in I-. O In 0 0 0 0 0 in ja C a) I--. N O A Ii 0 m 0 ;: 0 0 0 < v C K 0 m a- .c $ 5,239,000.001 $ 5,238,998.00-1 $ 34,738.75 i/1 I-+ N I -I 0 0 0 O O in- N N I -I 0 0 0 O O t/1 N N 1-+ 0 0 0 O O in. 1-. N N 0 0 0 O O in- N N N 0 0 0 O o to t/1 : Q1 A Ln V 0 0 O O in t/1 to in- i/1 in 1-. 1--. 1-> N F-+ i.. F -.F-. 1-> 1--. 1-> h1 1-..f N N A A A I A N o N N N N' W 0 U1 U7 Ul Ln W 0 0 00 0 U.I O O O o O O co O O O O O in- N N W W W O O to F-. N N W W W O O i/1 1--. 1-. I.. W W W O 0 in. 1--. '- 1-4 W W W O 0 tn. C1 a) 00 0 O O i/1 1--> N- N. W w W O 0 t/1 1-+ ' I-+ O 0 O O 0 i/1 1-> 1, N O 0 0 o 0 in 1-> N I-. O 0 0 O 0 N 1-> F-+ F, O 0 0 O 0 in. 1-> N N O 0 O O O in• 01 01 C1 0 0 in. 1-> I•-. N O 0 0 O 0 L1 F-. N NJ A 0 0 O 0 .,.... t/1 1--> I-. NJ A 0 0 o 000000000000000000000000 in ' -. F N. 1 NJ A 0 0 O ! € in- 1-> N NJ A 0 0 O t/1 Ln rn NJ 0 O O in F-+ I-+ NJ A 0 0 o in- 1- . I•-, 1--, 0 0 0 O in I-. I•-, F-+ 0 0 0 O i/1 F-. I•-, F, 0 0 0 O i/1 F-- N. 1--, 0 0 0 O in- F-- I— F-+ O 0 00 O tn. Cl 01I01 01 : 0 in- i I- F--' I--, O 0 O i/1 1-> N4 : NJ :. A 0 0 O {h 1-> N4 NJ A 0 0 O in- 1--> I--. NJ A 0 0 O t/1 U1 N 0 O in- to 1-> 1-+ I--. I-+ NJ NJ A A 0 0 0 0 O O . in F-> O V N VI 0 O in 1' 0 V N UI 0 O in- 1--, O V N In 0 O to A l0 0 i/1 F-- 0 J N U1 0 O in- F-- I, N Ol 0 0 O in. F� I. N 01 0 0 O i/1 F--- N. N : n 0 0 O i/1 F•-- N. N C1 0 0 O i/1 W a l/1 U.) 0 O in . C 1-> F-' N Cl 0 0 O C a1 ami p 7 OCi ier C a) C• 0 'a 0 -1 CO m i/1 A N CO F-' V U1 in N '.. 0 ':. A ! V: Ln in A W 0 N V V1 in A N LO N V U1 i/1 W V V N J U'1 in A NJ LO N V U1 in w1 V V 1-+ • V In . j . 1 1 in w O U.) C1 V U9 -11 Ln- w W V 0 - V 30 01 V U1 to Ir V W 0D O t/1 I --I O V NJ A v, N 00 :. : U) l00 :. to N lUD Cl A to N oV NJ A 11)i/1 A NJ A N COJ CO Cl to N VII N A j to N V W CCD t" *13 ' CO N— VI :: A CCD a7 7 73 < m to Ul NJUi W V 01 CO to i/1 W Cl A Cl tD : to . N CO ; V - co +. 1A E in V o LC) V 00 kr, in u1 W Cl A Cl Lo t/t• A V I--. A 01 `•.. LD th V 0 00 N W 1.0 i!1 rn N NJ U.) UJ LO i!1 v+ 0 NW 0 Cl A i/1'= m 01 z N' m '.. G, N' (O Cl { A 03 CL 00 CO a) N m + $ 34,738.75 $ 18,845.03 $ 801.19 $ 520.77 $ 801.19 $ 520.77 $ 715.29 $ 178.82 $ 715.29 $ 178.82 $ 715.29 $ 178.82 $ 894.11 $ 715.29 $ 178.82 $ 894.11 $ 715.29 $178.82 $ 894.11 $ 715.29 $.. 178.82 $ 894.11 $ 716.96 $ 466.02 $ 1,182.98 $ 716.96 $ 466.02 $ 1,182.98 $ 715.29 1 $ 178.821 $ 894.11 t/1 V N UI N lLc)1 V1 I --I J CO 00 NJ ■ in V U1 A W U1: V1 A LO 0 W W in V U1 A W in in A lD 0 W U.) i/1 V U1 A W U' t/1 P. VD 0 I W LU in V :. U'1 A W UI t/1 A LD 0 W W in J U1 I A W U1 i/1 N 00 00 61 10 in V N 111 N LO tn A Cl A lD A i/1 V N U1 N LO to A Cl A lD 1 A tN V I-+ to N , LC) t/1 A Cl A iD A N V N U1 N LC) to A Cl A lD A to V N VI N lD tn A Cl A is) A ih V N VI, N LD to A Cl A l0 A 1/1 V N A W U1 tn A to 0 W U.) iA V U1 A W U1 ' UN A ;lo 0 W W i/1 V Ul A W Ut t/1 A LD 0 W W i/1 V U1 A W UI t/1 A LD 0 W U.) UN V U1 A W U1 t/1 A lD 0 W W# to V E U1 IUi €. N ': ...0D tn i A kLO U.) 1 A V Vi- V UI t0 N LO t/1 A LO W A V to J U1 LSD N LO tn A LO U.) A V in J VI lD F+ LO i/? A LO W A J th V U1 U1 W U1 L1 A LSD 0 tD 00 i/I- V U1 U1 W VI t/1 A LID 0 tD 00 th V U1 U1 W U1 t/1 A LO 0 lD 00 to V VI U1 W U1 tn A LID 0 is, 00 i/1 - 717 CD 1D CD V: '' U1C UI = W 7y' U1 dddddd. tn- _ A l0 0 tD 00 Is. G CD a1 00 m co co m 7 no 'a m in 1.11 NN W V 01 N MEN to 00 I.C. A I-, N. in Lc, A N lfl A i/1 10 A N (.0: A i/1 10 A N lD A t/1 - l0 € A N lD A th l0 A N lD A in N 00 0 N W t/1 F-, F-, . Co 0 N W U/1 1--+ I --I 00 0 N U.) in N F-+ 00 0 N W in N N 00 0 N U.) in in I-, N N N' CO : A- 0; A N > 01 W CO in N E N A A:--:. On CO in 1--, N A A Cl CO in- 1-, N A A Cr, CO in I 1-, N[ A A Ol `, CO in. 1--I N U1 N 01 01 1 $ 1,252.66 in N N 1.11 N 01 01 in N N lJ1 N C1 01 in N N A Cr. W W 1 $ 1,246.33 Review $ 1,246.33 $ 2,728,000.00 $ 55,000.00 t/1 VI In O O 0 O O in U1 In o O 0 O O ih VI UI O O 0 o0 O if} UI UI O O 0 O 1./1 V1 i/1 in U/1 i/1 U1 01 01 01 Ol VI U7 41 01 01 Ol U7 O O O O O O O O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0'O O O O O O O t/1 VI U1 o O 0 O O in- VI U'1 o O 0 o O V1 U1 U1 O O 0 0 O N VI U1 O O 0 0 O t/1 VI U1 o O 0 0 o 1./1 VI U1 O O 0 0 O i/1 VI U1 O O 0 0 O t/1 U1 U1 o O 0 0 O tN UI U'1 O O 0 0 O i/1 VI !J7 o O 0 0 O V1 U/1 VI 01 ylO o o O O 0 0 o O O N 01 O o: O 0 O6 O ih V1 Cl Cl O O o+ o O O 0 0 o r O O i/1 Cl O o O 0 b O ti.} VI ul O O 0 0 O t/1 U'1 VI ; o' 0 0' 0'O.O O i/1 VI In O 0 0 O i/1 U7 In 0 0 0 O V1 VI lJ'1 0 O 0 O O i/1 1/1 U1 : 01 . in O 0. 0 O O 0-- 0 b -0 O O ih 01 O 0 O 0 O t? 01 O 0 O 0 0 O t/1 01 o 0 O 0 0 O t/1 `: 01 " O 0 O 0 O O in- 01 N 0 O 0 O O tR Cl `--I 0 O 0 O O I$ 61,000.00 1 $ 7-64-.275-f$ 496.76 t/1 01 N o O 0 o o $ 60,000.00 i $ 756.75 $ 491.89 I $ 1,248.64 th Cl o O O 0 O O PIMS Valuation Fee $ 60,000.00 $ 756.75 $ 34,877.25 $ 719.25 $ 719.25 in V N LD N U1 i/1 V N LID N V1 in. V N l0 N UI t/1 in- i/1 in in in. V co co co co '.. J I-, 0 0 0 0 '.. I-+ LD 1--, F-, F-> 1-, '.. t0 N V V V V N U1 U1 U1 U1 U1 Ln i/1 V N LC) N V. i/1 V I--1 l0 N V1 in V I-+ LO N U1 in V N l0 N U1 in. V N l0 N U1 V1 V N VD N U1 in J N LO N VI i/1 V N LD N U1 in. V I-, 1.0 N U1' in V I-, LO N U1 in. UN -co V V V N U'1 U1 (ID Cl 01 N V V U1 !. V. U1 t/1 t/1 ` V J U1 UI 01 :. Cl V V; U1 VI i/1 V UI 01 V UI in V I-, LO N VI in - V I- l0 N U. t/1 V I-, LD N V. in. V I-, to N U1 in. V I -I lD N U1 V1 in -co t/1 V1 in = V V V V N V N ` U1 U1 U1 U1 U1 l0 £ 01 01 01 01 Cl N :- V V V V V U1 U1 U1 VI U1 VI in V Cl A N U1 $ 764.25 I $ 496.76 $ 764.25 $ 496.76 1 $ 756.75 $ 491.89 F -I N A 00 O A in I -. V 0 A N t0 in- I-+ J CO 00 N in N V LO 00 N i/1 N V l0 CO 1-+ in I•-+ V to CO N in N V LC) 00 F� in in i/1 : i/1 I I I I-+ U1 U. UI V NJ NJ NJ lD I-. I-• F. Co i-> I--+ I-+ I- A A A '= V1 in U, A NJ Cl I-. V I--> 61 A I--. i/1 A 01 J U1 N t/1 A Cl V U1 N in A Cl V U1 1--. in A Cl V U1 I--' to A Cl J in 1-+ i/1 N V l0 bo N in N V LC) Co 1--. in I. V LO Co I> i/1 N V lD Co N in N V lD 00 F-- 7 in in in I-+ 1-1 V 00 CO t0 lD LD CO 1-> 1-> 1-> LD LD in in t/1 N N I-. CO CO CO l0 LD LCD i-> i� F-1 lD l0 LED i/1 A Cl V U1 F-' to A Cl V 61 1-, in A Cl V In 1 -1 in A Cl V In I- in A 01 V In 1--' V. in- V1 in in in-. A A A A A A Cl CD l0 lD UD lD i V I-. N N I-. I--. in 00 Co Co Co Co 1--I LD l0 LCD LD l0 to CO 01 V Cl Review Plan $ 491.89 $ 1,248.64 $ 491.89 $ 1,248.64 $ 52,581.54 $ 899.06 $ 899.06 i/1 00 LC) LO 0 Cl V1 00 LO l0 0 Cl i/1 00 LO LC) 0 Cl in 00 LD l0 0 01 1/1 I-. W N N Co LD -V) N. W N N Co l0 U/1 I-. W N N Co LD in- I-. W N N Do LD i/1 I. I -I co Cl V Cl in I-+ N co 01 V 01 in I"I N 00 01 V Cr) in 1--I N co 01 V Cl in N. N co C1 V Cl i/1 I-. 1--I co 01 V Cl in- 00 l0 l0 O Cl in 00 lD lD O 01 t/1 00 lD LO O 01 i/1 00 lD LO o Cl in- 00 CD lD 0 Cl in 00 1p LC) 0 Cl in lD A V1 lD A t/1' lD A U1 lD A i/1 LC A UI lD A ; in. l0 A in lD A t/1 l0 A UI LD A in N N 00 Cl V Cl in N N 00 01 V 01 1./1 I-. N 00 01 V 01 i/1 I-. N CO 01 V 01 in I-. - 00 01 J Cl in N N 00 01 V Cl in I --I N A 00 Cr, A i/1 N N A co m A ; i/1 i/1 I -I : I-. N N A A 00 OO Cr, Cr, A : A V11 I- N A co rn A in N. I N 01 N O N in N. N 01 N O I-, tn- F-+ N 01 N O h+ t/1 I• -I N C1 N O N $ 1,248.64 25%1 NJ U1 e NJ UI o N V1 o N VI e NJ U1 o Cl In o Cl U1 o Cl U1. o`+6,,o 01 to Cl VI 01 U'1 o Cl to e Cr) UI 0 01 VI 0 01 VI 0 NJ U1 NJ U1U1 0 25%, 25% N 0 NJ U1 0 L- 25%I N U1 0 25%] NJ VI 0 NJ U1 0 01 VI 0 01 U7 0 01 U1 01 U1 0 Cl V7 0 Cl U1 0 Cl Ut 0 01 U1 0 01 U1 0 Cr) U'1 0 Cl Ln 0 Cl U1 0 01 VI e Cl UI 0 01 U'1 0 Cl VI 0 Cl VI 0 Cl VI 0 01 U1 0 Plan Review % of Base 65% City of Ea�afl TO: Scott Peterson, Building Inspections Jon Hohenstein, Community Development /Mike Ridley, Planning Darrin Bramwell, Fire Marshal Russ Matthys, Engineering %John Gorder, Engineering Leon Weiland, Engineering /Jon Eaton, Utilities Eric Macbeth, Maintenance -"Gregg Hove, Maintenance FROM: Craig Novaczyk, Senior Building Inspector DATE: July 6, 2012 RE: Plan Review For: Northwood Family Townhomes 3255 Northwood Circle The plans are in our plan review section for your review and comment. #13 Please return this form to my attention with your signed comments within 7 days. Please indicate any concerns you have with these plans and resolve these issues with the affected parties. If you are requesting that issuance of the building permit be held, please submit the proper "hold request" form to me. Comments: Indicate below any fees that are to be collected with the building permit. Amount Landscape Security Required Zoning: Water Quality Dedication Meter Size: Park Dedication Trail Dedication Tree Dedication PRV Required ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No Signature Date G:\Building Inspections\FORMS\Commercial Bldgs Final & Plan Review Letters Craig Novaczyk From: Pam Dudziak Sent: Tuesday, July 31, 2012 3:46 PM To: 'Kim Bretheim' Cc: KariGill@dakotacda.state.mn.us; Anne Ryan; Craig Novaczyk Subject: RE: Northwood Townhomes Kim, One other thing, this property is located within the one -mile buffer of Airport Noise Zone 4, and the residential use is considered conditional because of this noise exposure. As a result, the construction design has to meet an interior sound reduction standard of 19 dBA. The Building Inspector will require information necessary to verify compliance with this sound attenuation standard. Kari, This was discussed in the staff report for the Comp Guide Amendment and Preliminary PD, and the sound attenuation level is in City Ordinances, although it was not reiterated in the conditions of the PD Agreement. Please let me know if you have any questions. Pam Dudziak Pamela Dudziak I Planner I City of Eagan City Hall 13830 Pilot Knob Road I Eagan, MN 55122 1651-675-5691 1651-675-5694 (Fax) I pdudziakna.citvofeanan.com City of kali THIS COMMUNICATION MAY CONTAIN CONFIDENTIAL AND/OR OTHERWISE PROPRIETARY MATERIAL and is thus for use only by the intended recipient. If you received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the e-mail and its attachments from all computers. From: Kim Bretheim Jmailto:Kim.Bretheim@lhbcorp.coml Sent: Tuesday, July 31, 2012 1:18 PM To: Pam Dudziak Cc: KariGill@dakotacda.state.mn.us; Anne Ryan Subject: RE: Northwood Townhomes Pam — if you prefer the windows from the exterior perspective — we can review putting them back on - just let us know - kim From: Anne Ryan Sent: Tuesday, July 31, 2012 12:03 PM To: pdudziak@cityofeagan.com Cc: KariGill@dakotacda.state.mn.us; Kim Bretheim Subject: RE: Northwood Townhomes Hi Pam, Windows in the upper level end walls of some of the units were in bedrooms and were deleted for furnishablily. The drawings from the PD were preliminary and as we developed them it seemed that it was not ideal to have windows on the "bed" wall. Annie From: Pam Dudziak[mailto:pdudziak@icityofeagan.coml Sent: Tuesday, July 31, 2012 11:37 AM 1 To: Kim Bretheim Cc: 'Kari Gill' Subject: Northwood Townhomes Kim, I am reviewing the plan set submitted with the building permit application and have a couple of comments and questions. 1) The Site Plan in the Final PD Agreement has a last revised date of 5/20/12. The Site Plan in the permit plan set is 5/9/12. When you submit revisions for the building permit, please provide the most current Site Plan. 2) Patio doors were added on the rear elevations of buildings 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6. Patios were shown on the Site Plan for the Final PD, but the patio doors were not. This modification is acceptable. 3) Upper level windows on the ends units of several buildings were omitted with the Building Permit plan set. Please explain the reason for this modification. Pamela Dudziak I Planner I City of Eagan City Hall 13830 Pilot Knob Road I Eagan, MN 55122 1651-675-5691 1651-675-5694 (Fax) I pdudziakS cityofeagan.com City Of E8Q8: THIS COMMUNICATION MAY CONTAIN CONFIDENTIAL AND/OR OTHERWISE PROPRIETARY MATERIAL and is thus for use only by the intended recipient. If you received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the e-mail and its attachments from all computers. 2 Planning Report — Eagan Northwoods (CDA) November 24, 2009 Page 4 The City's adopted Comprehensive Guide Plan currently designates the subject site as BP, Business Park, within this Special Area. If the City determines that residential uses are appropriate on this site, City Code and regional policy provide guidance in gauging whether such uses can be compatible, provisionally or conditionally acceptable, or inconsistent. Based on adopted Aircraft Noise Zones, the site is located within the one -mile Noise Buffer. Single and multiplex residential uses with individual entrances are considered Conditional Uses within the Noise Buffer Zone and must meet the following land use review factors identified in the Metropolitan Council 2030 Transportation Plan -Appendix L: 1. Proposed construction design will provide outdoor to indoor attenuation required by structure performance standards in Table L-4. The table indicates the interior sound level standard for residential uses is 45 dBa. New residential construction as proposed will require a minimum 19 dBa noise reduction within_ the_ Buffer_ Zone. 2. Is the site located under a major departure flight track used by jets? The site lies 3.5 miles southeast of the parallel runways at MSP. Significant fanning of takeoff flights over Eagan reduces direct noise impact under or adjacent to any major departure flight tracks. Therefore the proposed use should be considered compatible with this factor. 3. Is the site located parallel to a primary runway used by jets? The subject site is not located parallel to a primary runway. 4. Is the site located parallel to a runway to be used for unshielded engine run -ups? The subject site is not located parallel to a runway used for unshielded engine run -ups. 5. Is the proposal consistent with adjacent land use ambient noise; and is it consistent with the overall comprehensive plan? A comprehensive guide plan amendment is proposed to permit residential uses on the site. 6. Has the local government adopted an effective method to inform future occupants of aircraft noise exposure? The noise contours are shown on the City's Zoning Map and on the Land Use Map within the City's Comprehensive Guide Plan. Planned Development Zoning - The Planned Development zoning district allows the developer to have greater flexibility in the design of the development and the City to require higher standards in exchange for that flexibility. For evaluation purposes, the typical zoning district standards for the proposed use housing types are used as a basis for comparison for the proposed Planned Development. The proposed development is townhomes, therefore, the R-3 zoning standards will be used for the evaluation. Term — Staff suggests a five-year term for this Preliminary Planned Development. ?)suo *. City of Eagan Kemp TO: Scott Peterson, Building Inspections Jon Hohenstein, Community Development Mike Ridley, Planning Darrin Bramwell, Fire Marshal Russ Matthys, Engineering John Gorder, Engineering Leon Weiland, Engineering Jon Eaton, Utilities Eric Macbeth, Maintenance Gregg Hove, Maintenance FROM: Craig Novaczyk, Senior Building Inspector DATE: July 6, 2012 RE: Plan Review For: Northwood Family Townhomes 3255 Northwood Circle The plans are in our plan review section for your review and comment. #13 Please return this form to my attention with your signed comments within 7 days. Please indicate any concerns you have with these plans and resolve these issues with the affected parties. If you are requesting that issuance of the building permit be held, please submit the proper "hold request" form to me. Comments: Y�3f1 -ill/vl?�l`/i �I`�{ {y�v� -, -J 'L "sed 5/2-d/2-) A (fT trv-t- w ✓`Lo -e �I%J o SA `( — 1\k,1I ✓ 50 4 Indicate below any fees that are to be collected with the building permit. Amount Landscape Security Required A' Zoning: Water Quality Dedication Meter Size: Park Dedication Trail Dedication Tree Dedication PRV Required Yes ❑ Yes (IR Yes ja Yes ❑ Yes ❑ Yes ❑ No No ❑ No ❑ No p No ❑ No 496 0,1 52(0 `'7S) ��31( Date z G:\Building Inspections\FORMS\Commercial Bldgs Final & Plan Review Letters 1 -.1177,4A-0 -POO* S w a-105-ah f {a- ti peal; c 5, f04 4S 0; s.€ Vic) -covise✓v. es()L s. u,.)‘(\010v--) 12e,,,,r lo b,g/t-r ower. ery,� /L4_0A-- GifizJA `D� / C'k 11 6943 fi- *10 uoieAS '*) City of Ea�all demo TO: Scott Peterson, Building Inspections Jon Hohenstein, Community Development Mike Ridley, Planning Darrin Bramwell, Fire Marshal Russ Matthys, Engineering John Gorder, Engineering Leon Weiland, Engineering Jon Eaton, Utilities Eric Macbeth, Maintenance Gregg Hove, Maintenance FROM: Craig Novaczyk, Senior Building Inspector DATE: July 6, 2012 RE: Plan Review For: Northwood Family Townhomes 3255 Northwood Circle #13 The plans are in our plan review section for your review and comment. Please return this form to my attention with your signed comments within 7 days. Please indicate any concerns you have with these plans and resolve these issues with the affected parties. If you are requesting that issuance of the building permit be held, please submit the proper "hold request" form to me. Comments: Indicate below any fees that are to be collected with the building permit. Amount ❑ Yes 0 No Landscape Security Required Zoning: ❑ Yes ❑ No Water Quality Dedication Meter Size: ❑ Yes ❑ No Park Dedication El Yes El No Trail Dedication 0 Yes No Tree Dedication 0 Yes N• PRV Required Signa Date G:\Building Inspections\FORMS\Commercial'3ldgs Final & Plan Review Letters f*° City of Ea�ali Nemo TO: Scott Peterson, Building Inspections Jon Hohenstein, Community Development Mike Ridley, Planning Darrin Bramwell, Fire Marshal Russ Matthys, Engineering John Corder, Engineering Leon Weiland, Engineering Jon Eaton, Utilities Eric Macbeth, Maintenance Gregg Hove, Maintenance F' + Craig Novaczyk, Senior Bu ing Inspector DA July 6, 2012 RE: Plan Review For: Northwood Family Townhomes 3255 Northwood Circle #13 The plans are in our plan review section for your review and comment. Please return this form to my attention with your signed comments within 7 days. Please indicate any concerns you have with these plans and resolve these issues with the affected parties. If you are requesting that issuance of the building permit be held, please submit the proper "hold request" form to me. Comments: /60•A)R.,_ Indicate below any fees that are to be collected with the building permit. Amount Landscape Security Required Zoning: Water Quality Dedication Meter Size: Park Dedication Trail Dedication Tree Dedication RV R; quired ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes 0 No ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes 0 No ❑ Yes ❑ Siture Date q(L0/1/4 G:\Building Inspections\FORMS\Commercial Bldgs Final & Plan Review Letters City of Eagan Nemo TO: Scott Peterson, Building Inspections Jon Hohenstein, Community Development Mike Ridley, Planning Darrin Bramwell, Fire Marshal Russ Matthys, Engineering John Gorder, Engineering Leon Weiland, Engineering Jon Eaton, Utilities Eric Macbeth, Maintenance Gregg Hove, Maintenance FROM: Craig Novaczyk, Senior Building Inspector DATE: July 6, 2012 RE: Plan Review For: Northwood Family Townhomes 3255 Northwood Circle :i # 13 WHP - vw1\n( 004?cc rncw % n �r��w4L 5c.�,.��,r.` The plans are in our plan review section for your review and comment. Please return this form to my attention with your signed comments within 7 days. Please indicate any concerns you have with these plans and resolve these issues with the affected parties. If you are requesting that issuance of the building permit be held, please submit the proper "hold request" form to me. Comments: Indicate below any fees that are to be collected with the building permit. Amount ❑ Yes ❑ Yes ❑ Yes ❑ Yes ❑ s ❑ ds O No Landscape Security Required Zoning: O No Water Quality Dedication Meter Size: O No Park Dedication O No Trail Dedication O No Tree Dedication PV Required ture Date G:\Building Inspections\FORMS\Commercial Bldgs Final & Plan Review Letters City of Eaali WeMo TO: Scott Peterson, Building Inspections Jon Hohenstein, Community Development Mike Ridley, Planning Darrin Bramwell, Fire Marshal Russ Matthys, Engineering John Gorder, Engineering Leon Weiland, Engineering Jon Eaton, Utilities Eric Macbeth, Maintenance Gregg Hove, Maintenance FROM: Craig Novaczyk, Senior Building Inspector DATE: July 6, 2012 RE: Plan Review For: Northwood Family Townhomes 3255 Northwood Circle # 13 The plans are in our plan review section for your review and comment. Please return this form to my attention with your signed comments within 7 days. Please indicate any concerns you have with these plans and resolve these issues with the affected parties. If you are requesting that issuance of the building permit be held, please submit the proper "hold request" form to me. Comments: fr7'o7(.e,( 4-0 Indicate below any fees that are to be collected with the building permit. Amount ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes la/No ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Y-: ❑ No Landscape Security Required Zoning: Water Quality Dedication Meter Size: Park Dedication Trail Dedication Tree Dedication PRV quired Signatur _ Date G:\Building Inspections\FORMS\Commercial Bldgs Final & Plan Review Letters City of Eagan TO: Scott Peterson, Building Inspections Jon Hohenstein, Community Development Mike Ridley, Planning, Darrin Bramwell, Fire Marshal Russ Matthys, Engineering John Gorder, Engineering Leon Weiland, Engineering Jon Eaton, Utilities Eric Macbeth, Maintenance Gregg Hove, Maintenance FROM: Craig Novaczyk, Senior Building Inspector DATE: July 6, 2012 RE: Plan Review For: Northwood Family Townhomes 3255 Northwood Circle The plans are in our plan review section for your review and comment. # 13 Please return this form to my attention with your signed comments within 7 days. Please indicate any concerns you have with these plans and resolve these issues with the affected parties. If you are requesting that issuance of the building permit be held, please submit the proper "hold request" form to me. Comments: ,C'i(Z• 07, fCV/ LCA.5 cr- 1(7-li e 27 Indicate below any fees that are to be collected with the building permit. Amount ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ErNo Landscape Security Required Water Quality Dedication Park Dedication Trail Dedication Tree Dedication PRV Required Date Zoning: Meter Size: G:\Building Inspections\FORMS\Commercial Bldgs Final & Plan Review Letters