No preview available
 /
     
3545 Sawgrass Tr E -71 Use BLUE or BLACK Ink For Office Use f. le)7 4-7 City of Way -71 1 I Permit J~ 1 ' Permit Fee: __77 f~ 3830 Pilot Knob Road / y 0` C'J Eagan MN 55122 Date Received: I Phone: (661)676-5675 1 I Fax: (651) 675-5694 1 Staff: I I I J 2012 RESIDENTIAL BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION Date: /U 57!/,7- Site Address: -7--;--- 1~ Unit Name: L /Vi9 CO Phone: RESIDENT / OWNER Address / City / Zip: Applicant is: Owner Contractor` C S TYPE OF WORK Description of work: /y C4Nr t*'/` W' , /`t"; i~ (k `i " Construction Cost: t19 l Z< / Multi-Family Building: (Yes / No Company: Ze "PL_ 601'e Contact: h-014 Address: ~~6~s vc)Gt/ddc. - Z'940ty: ~A ~9►t.> -If CONTRACTOR tv,n State: M/~ Zip: elloo T Phone: License Lead Certificate If the project is exempt from lead certification, please explain why: (see Page 3 for additional information) COMPLETE THIS AREA ONLY IF CONSTRUCTING A NEW BUILDING In Vh9las 2 months, has the City of Eagan issued a permit for a similar plan based on a master plan? _No if yes, date and address of master plan: Licensed Plumber: /Gf Phone: ~I~~~ Mechanical Contractor: 1 P Lr Phone: / ~r Sewer & Water Contractor: Phon` ed 6f~l NOTE; Plans and supporting documents at you submit are considered to be public information. Portions of the information may be classified as non-public if you provide specific reasons that would permit the City to conclude that the are trade secrets. CALL BEFORE YOU DIG. Call Gopher State One Call at (651) 454-0002 for protection against underground utility damage. Call 48 hours before you intend to dig to receive locates of underground utilities. www.gopherstateonecall.org I hereby acknowledge that this information is complete and accurate; that the work will be in conformance with the ordinances and codes of the City of Eagan; that I understand this is not a permit, but only an application for a permit, and work is not to start without a permit; that the work will be in accordance with the approved plan in the case of work which requires a review and approval of plans. Exterior work authorized by a building permit Issued in accordance with the Minnesota State Building Code must be completed within 180 days of permit Issuance. x ~0 Ava//-'e ~~S dL✓ x Applic nt's Pr ted Name Applicant' ignature Page 1 of 3 SS 1-r ` DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS I E ~p SUB TYPES _ Foundation - Fireplace - Porch (3-Season) _ Storm Damage - Single Family - Garage - Porch (4-Season) _ Exterior Alteration (Single Family) Multi - Deck - Porch (Screen/Gazebo/Pergola) _ Exterior Alteration (Multi) 01 of,'~6JPlex _ Lower Level _ Pool _ Miscellaneous _ Accessory Building WORK TYPES New - Interior Improvement _ Siding Demolish Building* Addition _ Move Building _ Reroof _ Demolish Interior Alteration _ Fire Repair _ Windows _ Demolish Foundation _ Replace _ Repair _ Egress Window _ Water Damage Retaining Wall •Demolition of entire building - give PCA handout to applicant DESCRIPTION Valuation P,453 Occupancy MCES System Plan Review I Code Edition SAC Units (25%x(100%__) Zonings City Water CensulCode Stories Booster Pump # of Units Square Feet t PRV # of Buildings Length Fire Sprinklers Type of Construction Width REQUIRED INSPECTIONS 'SA Footings (New Building) Meter Size: Footings (Deck) Final I C.O. Required Footings (Addition) Final I No C.O. Required Foundation HVAC _ Gas Service Test Gas Line Air Test Drain Tile Other: Roof: -Ice & Water -Final Pool: -Footings Air as Tests -Final Framing Siding: -Stucco Lat ~ one La -Brick A- Sli Fireplace: Rough In Air Test Final Windows Insulation Retaining Wall: _ Footings _ Backfill _ Final Sheathing Radon Control Sheetrock Erosion Control leviewed By: Building Inspector RESIDENTIAL FEES Base Fee 0' 1 1 Surcharge r 44 Plan Review EC 0 ~0 l 0i~3 ~ 2~~o ~t/~ City SAC YI ~-{I Utility Connection Charge S$W Permit & Surcharge Treatment Plant Copies 1~ l TOTAL New Construction Energy Code Compliance Certificate Per N1101.8 Building Certificate. A building certificate shall be posted in a permanently visible location inside Date Certificate Polled the building. The certificate shall be completed by the builder and shall list information and values of components listed in Table N 1101.8. Mailing Address of lire Metling or Dneliing Unit city 3545 SAWGRASS TRAIL EAST EAGAN Name or aasidenlial Contractor MN Liceaw Number THERMAL ENVELOPE RADON SYSTEM Type: Check All That Apply X Passive (No Fait) w o ~ r Active (With fan and mononieter or E > other systentnionitot-Mgdevice). w d r ~O o n Q m co U Insulation Location z o z n a u Q F z i% w V. w° oK l4 Other Please Describe Here Below Entire Slab X Foundation Wall 10 INTERIOR Perimeter of Slab on Grade X Rim Joist (Foundation) 10 INTERIOR Rim Joist (1" Floor+) 10 INTERIOR: Wall 21 Ceiling, flat 44 Ceiling, vaulted 44 Bay Windows or cantilevered areas 3821 10 5 Bonus room over garage X Describe other insulated areas Windows & Doors Heating or cooling Ducts Outside Conditioned Spaces Average U-Factor (excludes skylights and one door) U; 0.29 Not ap licable, all ducts located in conditioned space Solar Heat Gain Coefficient (SHGC): 0.29 X R-value R-8 MECHANICAL SYSTEMS Make-up Air Select a Type Appliances rHeatili System Domestic Water Heater Cooling System X Not re uired per mech. code Fuel! Type atural Gas Natural Gas Electric Passive Manufacturer Lennox AO Smith Lennox Powered Interlocked with exhaust device. Model ML193UH07OP24B GPVH50N 13ACX-024-230 Describe: Input in BB 000 Capacity in Output in 2 Other, describe: Rating or Size BTUS: Gallons: so Tons: Heat Loss: Heat Gain:: Location of duct or system: Structure's Calculated 64,631 19,504 AFUE or SEER: 13 HSPF9'o 93 Calculated 23,001 Efficiency coolie bad: Cfm's PLAN KINGSTON "round duct OR Mechanical Ventilation System " metal duct Describe any additional or combined heating or cooling systems if installed: (e.g. two furnaces or air Combustion Air Select a source heat pump with gas back-up furnace): Not requited per mech. code Select Type X Passive Heat Recover Ventilator (HRV) Capacity in cfms: Low; High: Other, describe: Energy Recover Ventilator (ERV) Capacity in cfms: Low: High: Location of duct or system: X Continuous exhausting fan(s) rated capacity in cfms: 80 Mechanical Room Location of fan(s), describe: Owners bath fm's Capacity continuous ventilation rate in cfms: 60 6" Insulated Flex Total ventilation (intermittent + continuous) rate in cfms: 435 " metal duct Created by BAM version 052009 PLAN REVIEW FOR COMPLIANCE WITH AIRCRAFT NOISE ORDINANCE Compliance with Procedures to Ensure Submitter: Noise Impact Area Adequate Noise Attenuation: Lennar Airport - MSP International Exterior wall construction: 16305 36th Ave. No. Noise Zone - 4 LP Smart Board Suite 600 15/32" sheathing Plymouth, MN 55446 New Infill Residence is a "CONY Tyvek wrap 952-249-3000 use in Noise Zone 4 2x6 studs 16" O.C. R-21 batt insulation with 1/2" gypsum board Roof Construction: Plan Reviewed: LL Peaked roof with manufactured trusses 24" O.C. 7-v Ki6i 7,1 7 i Roof vents ')n) Ll 15 4 k%Cz 1 _'V Shingles Information Submitted: 15# felt Annotated architectural drawings includin : 1/2" sheathing Blown insulation R-44 Windows: Atrium 5/8" gypsum board Swinging Patio Doors: Atrium Entry Doors: Therma Tru Mechanical Ventilation System: Skylights: N/A 3-ton central air conditioning unit Compliance with STC Requirements: Window, Door Frame, Perimeter and Other Seals: All window and door openings are to be caulked Average window/wall area for exterior wall: with butyl-based caulk With this window/wall area ratio and STC 40 walls, windows Fireplace Chimney Cap: with an STC 30 can be used to meet the noise reduction Built-in flue damper, chimney cap, glass enclosed requirements; Ventilation Duct Exterior Wall Penetrations: Summa : All exterior ducts will have bends as required by the ordinance Other measures including duct bends and caulking are being taken to ensure minimum transmission of noise through the Door and Window Construction: exterior building shell so that the construction should meet Windows: Atrium (30 STC) the compatibility guidelines. Sliding Patio Doors: Atrium (30 STC) Therefore, the materials and construction as proposed should meet the requirements of the Eagan aircraft noise ordinance. Entry Doors: Therma Tru (29 STC) Skylights: N/A Review Completed (date): 41 - 7 2_ Other Exterior Wall Penetrations: Review Completed by: Tom Tamte Sill sealer between plates and blocks e Ventilation, Makeup and Combustion Air Calculations submittal Form For New Dwellings These blank submittal forms and instructions are available at the City website and at City Hall. The completed form must be submit- ted in duplicate at tWtime of application of a mechanical permit for new construction. Additional forms may be downloaded and printed at: Site address YS r i~r` , G S T Date `Z_ Contractor Completed Section A Ventilation Quantity (Determine quantity by using Table N1104.2 or Equation 11-1) [Square {eet (Conditioned area including Basement- finished or unfinished) 13% t~ Total required ventilation s mber of bedrooms Continuous ventilation S$ Directions - Determine the total and continuous ven Nation rate by either using Table N1104.2 or equation 11-1. The table and equation are below. Table N1104.2 Total and Continuous Ventilation Rates (in cfm) Number of Bedrooms 1 fl16S/831 g 4 5 Conditioned space (in Total/ Total/ Total/ Total/ Total/ sq• t•) nuous continuous continuous continuous continuous 1000-1500 60/40 90/45 105/53 1501-2000 70/40 100/50 115/58 130/65 145/73 2001-2500 80/40 110/55 125/63 140/70 155/78 2501-3000 90/45 3 120/60 135/68 150/75 165/83 30013500 100/50 8 130/65 145/73 160/80 175/88 3501-4000 110/55 3 140/70 15S/78 170/85 185/93 4001-4500 120/60 8 150/75 165/$3 180/90 195/98 4501-5000 130/65 3 160/80 175/88 190/95 205/103 5001-5500 140/70 170/85 185/93 200/100 215/108. 5501-6000 150/75 180/90 195/98 210/105 225/113 Equation 11-1 (0.02 x square feet of conditioned space) + 115 x (number of bedrooms + 1)j = Total ventilation rate (cfm) Total ventilation -The mechanical ventilation system shall provide sufficient outdoor air to equal the total ventilation rate average, for each one-hour period according to the above table or equation. For heat recovery ventilators (HRV) and energy recovery ventila- tors (ERV) the average hourly ventilation capacity must be determined in consideration of any reduction of exhaust or out outdoor air intake, or both, for defrost or other equipment cycling. Continuous ventilation - A minimum of 50 percent of the total ventilation rate, but not less than 40 cfm, shall be provided, on a con- tinuous rate average for each one-hour period. The portion of the mechanical ventilation system intended to be continuous may have automatic cycling controls providing the average flow rate for each hour is met. G:ISAFET'AJKlVent-makeup-comb air submittal (2).docx Page 1 Of 6 I I I Section B Ventilation Method (Choose either balanced or exhaust only) [ery Balanced, HRV (Heat Recovery Ventilator) or ERV (Energy Re ` cov- Exhaust only ` Ventilator) - cfm of unit in low must not exceed continuous vents- Continuous fan rating in cfm ' c " Cer rO+ n` tion rating by more than 100%. Low cfm: High dm- ===j fan ratingln cfm (capacity must not exceed uous ventilation rating by more than 100%)[ih Directions -Choose the method of ventilation, balanced or exhaust only. Balanced ventilation systems are typically HRV or ERV's. Enter the low and high cfm amounts. Low c air flaw must be equal to or greater than the required continuous ventilation rate and less than 100% greater than the continuous rate. (For instance, if the low cfm is 40 cfm, the ven Motion fan must not exceed 80 cfm.) Automatic controls may allow the use of a largerfan that is operated a percentage of each hour. Section C Ventilation Fan Schedule Description Location Continuous Intermittent / N ~6.f 15i ~ L.~ a,• - Directions - The ventilation fan schedule should describe what the fan is for, the location, cfm, and whether it is used for continuous or intermittent ventilation. The fan that is chose for continuous ventilation must be equal to or greater than the low c m air rating and less than 100% greater than the continuous rate. (For instance, if the low cfm is 40 cfm, the continuous ventilation fan must not exceed 80 cfm.) Automatic controls may allow the use of a larger fan that, is operated a percentage of each hour. Section D Ventilation Controls Describe operation and control of the continuous and intermittent ventilation Directions - Describe the operation of the ventilation system. There should be adequate detail for plan reviewers and inspectors to verify design and installation compliance. Related trades also need adequate detail for placement of controls and proper operation of the building ventilation. if exhoustfans are used for building ventilation describe the operation and location of any controls, indicators and legends. !fan ERV or HRV is to be installed, describe how It will be installed. If it will be connected and interfaced with the air handling equipment please describe such connections as detailed in the manufactures' installation instructions. If the Installation instructions require or recommend the equipment to be interlocked with the air handling equipmentfor proper operation, such interconnection shall be made and described. Section E Make-up air Passive (determined from calculatlons from Table 501.3.1) Powered (determined from calculations from Table 501.31) Interlocked with exhaust device (determined from calculation from stable 501.3.1) Other, describe: Location of duct or system ventilation make-up air: Determined from make up air opening table Cfm Size and type (round, rectangular, flex or rigid) (NR means not required) Page 2 of 6 Directions - In order to determine the makeup air, Table 501.3.1 must be filled out (see below). For most new installations, column A will be appropriate, however, if atmospherically vented appliances orsolid fuel appliances are installed, use the appropriate column. For existing dwellings, see 1MC 501.3.3. Please note, if the makeup air quantity is negative, no additional makeup air will be re- quired for ventilation, If the value is positive refer to Table 501.3.2 and size the opening. Transfer the cfm, size of opening and type (round, rectangular, flexor rigid) to the last line of section D. The make-up air supply must be installed per IMC501.3.2.3. Table 501.3.1 PROCEDURE TO DETERMINE MAKEUP AIR QUANITY FOR EXHAUST EQUIPMENT IN DWELLINGS (Additional combustion air wilt be required for combustion appliances, see KAIR method for calculations) One or multiple power one or multiple fan- One atmospherically vent Multiple atmospherlcal- vent or direct vent ap- assisted appliances and gas or oil appliance or ly vented gas or oil pliances or no combus- power vent or direct vent one solid fuel appliance appliances or solid fuel tion appliances appliances appliances Column C Column D Column A Column B L a) pressure factor 0.15 0.09 0 06 (cfm/sf) 0.03 b) conditioned floor area (sq (including 7 unfinished basements) J 3(a !r/' Estimated House Infiltration (cfm); (la xlb] 5-05, 2. Exhaust Capacity a) continuous exhaust-only ventilation r system (cfm); (not applicable to ba- I' U lanced ventilation systems such as HRV b) clothes dryer (cfm) 135 135 135 135 c) 80% of largest exhaust rating (cfm); Kitchen hood typically (not applicable if recirculating system ~ y~ or if powered makeup air is electrically interlocked and match to exhaust d) 80% of next largest exhaust rating (cfm); bath fan typically Not (not applicable if recirculating system or if powered makeup air is electrically Applicable Interlocked and matched to exhaust) Total Exhaust Capacity (cfm); (2a + 2b +2c + 2d] 3. Makeup Air Quantity (cfm) a) total exhaust capacity (from above) b) estimated house infiltration (from above S'(1 S Makeup Air Quantity (cfm); (3a - 3b] (if value is negative, no makeup air is needed) 4. For makeup Air Opening Sizing, refer ^ ' , /J to Table 501.4.2 / i/ A. Use this column if there are other than fan-assisted or atmospherically vented gas or oil appliance or if there are no combustion appliances. (Power vent and direct vent appliances may be used.) B. Use this column if there is one fan-assisted appliance per venting system. (Appliances other than atmospherically vented appliances may also be in- cluded.) C. Use this column If there Is one atmospherically vented (other than fan-assisted) gas or oil appliance per venting system or one solid fuel appliance. D. Use this column If there are multiple atmospherically vented gas or oil appliances using a common vent or If there are atmospherically vented gas or oil appliances and solid fuel appliances. Page 3 of 6 Makeup Air Opening Table for New and Existing Dwelling Table 501.3.2 One or multiple power One or multiple fan- One atmospherically Multiple atmospherically vent, direct vent ap- assisted appliances and vented gas or oil ap- vented gas or oil ap- Duct dl- pliances, or no combus- power vent or direct piiance or one solid fuel pilances or solid fuel ameter tion appliances vent appliances appliance appliances Column A Column 8 Column C Column D Passive opening 1-36 1-22 1-15 1-9 3 Passive opening 37-66 23-41 16-28 10-17 4 Pass[ veopening 67-109 42-66 29-46 18-28 5 Passive opening 110-163 67-100 47-69 29_42 6 Passive opening 164-232 101-143 70-99 43-61 7 Passive opening 233-317 144-19S 100-135 62 - 83 8 Passive opening 318-419 196-258 136-179 84-110 9 w/motorized damper Passive opening 420-539 259-332 180-230 111-142 10 w/motorized damper Passive opening 540 - 679 333 - 419 231-290 143-179 11 w/motorized damper Powered makeup air >679 >419 >290 >179 NA Notes: A. An equivalent length of 100 feet of round smooth metal duct is assumed. Subtract 40 feet for the exterior hood and ten feet for each 90- degree elbow to ..r determine the remaining length of straight duct allowable. B. If flexible duct Is used, increase the duct diameter by one Inch. Flexible duct shall be stretched with minimal sags. Compressed duct shall not be accepted. C. Barometric dampers are prohibited in passive makeup air openings when any atmospherically vented appliance is installed. 0. Powered makeup air shall be electrically interlocked with the largest exhaust system. Sections F Combustion air Not required per mechanical code (No atmospheric or power vented appliances) h Passive (see IFGC Appendix E, Worksheet E-l) Size and type [ .~X Other, describe: Explanation -If no atmospheric or power vented appliances are installed, check the appropriate box, not required. if a power vented or atmospherically vented appliance installed, use IFGCAppendix E, Worksheet E-1 (see below). Please enter size and type. Combus- tion air vent supplies must communicate with the appliance or appliances that require the combustion air. Section F calculations follow on the next 2 pages. I I, II I Page 4 of 6 Directions - The Minnesota Fuel Gas Code method to calculate to size of a required combustion air opening, is called the Known Air Infiltration Rate Method. For new construction, 4b of step 4 is required to be filled out. IFGC Appendix E, Worksheet E-1 Residential Combustion Air Calculation Method (for Furnace, Boiler, and/or Water Heater in the Same Space) Step 1: Complete vented combustion appliance information. Furnace/Boiler: _ Draft Hood _ Fan Assisted Y Direct Vent Input: Btu/hr or Power Vent Water Heater, _ Draft Hood Fan Assisted _ Direct Vent input: y~_Btu/hr or Power Vent ulate the volume of the Combustion Appliance Space( S) containing combustion appliances, ludes all spaces connected to one another by code compliant openings. CAS volume:7 322 ftL x W x Ii L W H [The E10eterml ep ne Air Changes per H our (ACH)1 Default ACH values have been Incorporated Into Table E-1 for use with Method 4b (KAIR Method). If the year of construction or ACH is not known, use method 4a Standard Method), Step 4: Determine Required Volume for Combustion Air. (DO NOT COUNT DIRECT VENT APPLIANCES) 4a. Standard Method Total Btu/hr Input of all combustion appliances Input: Btu/hr Use Standard Method column in Table E-1 to find Total Required TRV: ftn Volume (TRV) If CAS Volume (from Step 2) is greater than TRV then no outdoor openings are needed. If CAS Volume (from Step 2) is less than TRV then go to STEP S. > 4b. Known Air Infiltration Rate (KAIR) Method (DO NOT COUNT DIRECT VENT APPLIANCES) Total Btu/hr input of all fan-assisted and power vent appliances Input: 61 601 - Btu/hr Use Fan-Assisted Appliances column in Table E-1 to find RVFA: _ j e.)GYj fta Required Volume Fan Assisted (RVFA) Total Btu/hr input of all Natural draft appliances Input: Btu/hr Use Natural draft Appliances column in Table E-1 to find RVNFA: fta Required Volume Natural draft appliances (RVNDA) Total Required Volume (TRV) = RVFA+ RVNDA TRV deft) TRV fta If CAS Volume (from Step 2) is greater than TRV then no outdoor openings are needed. If CAS Volume From Step 2} Is less than TRV then go to STEP S. Step 5: Calculate the ratio of available interior volume to the total required volume. Ratio = CAS Volume (from Step 2) divided by TRV (from Step 4a or Step 4b) ' Step Calculate Reduction Factor (RF). Ratio = / ? _ RF =1 minus Ratio RF =1- G = i/ Step 7: Calculate single outdoor opening as if all combustion air Is from outside. Total Btu/hr Input of all Combustion Appliances in the same CAS Input: tO,Q C-) Btu/hr (EXCEPT DIRECT VENT) - Combustion Air Opening Area (CAOA): Total Btu/hr divided by 3000 Btu/hr per in' CAOA = 13000 Btu/hr per in' in' Step B: Calculate Minimum CAOA. Minimum CAOA = CAOA multiplied by RF Minimum CAOA = JS' 3,3 x 3 in' Step 9: Calculate Combustion Air Opening Diameter (CAOD) CAOD =1.13 multiplied by the square root of Minimum CAOA CAOD =1.13 V Minimum CAOA =v? ~o In. diameter go up one Inch In size If using flex duct 1 if desired, ACH can be determined using ASHRAE calculation or bfawer door test. Follow procedures in Section 6304, Page 5 of 6 -~wrightsoftrProject Summary Job: Entire House Date: October 8, 2012 Scott M By: ELANDER MECHANICAL INCORPORATED 691 CITATION DRIVE, SHAKOPEE, MN 55379 Phone: 952.445.4692 Fax: 952.445-7487 Email: SALES@ELANDEFIMECHANICAL.COM Proiedt • , For: G, ooa Sysv Notes: = 02 i r 11 - • • • Weather: Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN, US Winter Design Conditions Summer Design Conditions Outside db -15 OF Outside db 88 OF Inside db 70 OF Inside db 75 OF Design TD 85 OF Design TD 13 OF Daily range M Relative humidity 50 % Moisture difference 26 gr/Ib Heating Summary Sensible Cooling Equipment Load Sizing Structure 40912 Btuh Structure 17208 Btuh Ducts 984 Btuh Ducts 446 Btuh Central vent (60 cfm) 5442 Btuh Central vent (60 cfm) 826 Btuh Humidification 7293 Btuh Blower 1024 Btuh Piping 0 Btuh Equipment load 54631 Btuh Use manufacturer's data Rate/swing multiplier 1.00 Infiltration Equipment sensible load 19504 Btuh Method Simplified Latent Cooling Equipment Load Sizing Construction quality Tight Fireplaces 1 (Tight) Structure 2423 Btuh Ducts 41 Btuh Heating Cooling Central vent 60 cfm) 1033 Btuh Area (ft2) 3340 3340 Equipment latent load 3497 Btuh Volume (ft3) 18157 18157 Air changes/hour 0.35 0.35 Equipment total load 23001 Btuh Equiv. AVF (cfm) 106 106 Req. total capacity at 0.70 SHR 2.3 ton Heating Equipment Summary Cooling Equipment Summary Make Lennox Make Lennox Trade MERIT 90 Trade 13ACX SERIES - RFC Model ML193UH070P24B-* Cond 13ACX-024-230*13 GAMA ID 4119044 Coil C33-25*++TDR ARI ref no. 3660136 Efficiency 93 AFUE Efficiency 11.0 EER, 13 SEER Heating input 66000 Btuh Sensible cooling 16240 Btuh Heating output 62000 Btuh Latent cooling 6960 Btuh Temperature rise 50 OF Total cooling 23200 Btuh Actual air flow 1162 cfm Actual air flow 773 cfm Air flow factor 0.028 cfm/Btuh Air flow factor 0.044 cfm/Btuh Static pressure 0 in H2O Static pressure 0 in H2O Space thermostat Load sensible heat ratio 0.85 8old/he11C values have been manually overridden A-1- Printout certified by ACCA to meet all requirements of Manual J 8th Ed. r+= 1-- wrlghtsoft• Flight-Suite® Universal 8.0.04 RSU13410 2012-Oct-0812:45:50 ACGK ElandeADeaktop\wrightsoft Heat LosslLennar Kingston Eagan.rup Calc = MJB Front Door faces: Page 1 wrightsoft° Component Constructions Job: Date: October 8, 2012 Entire House By: Scott M ELANDER MECHANICAL INCORPORATED 591 CITATION DRIVE, SHAKOPEE, MN 55379 Phone: 952.445.4692 Fax: 952-445-7487 Email: SALES@ELANDERMECHANICAL.COM F oject Information For: Design Conditions Location: Indoor: Heating Cooling Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN, US Indoor temperature (°F) 70 75 Elevation: 837 ft Design TD (°F) 85 13 Latitude: 45°N Relative humidity 50 50 Outdoor: Heating Cooling Moisture difference (grhb) 54.5 26.1 Dry bulb (°F) -15 88 Infiltration: Daily range (°F) - 19 (M) Method Simplified Wet bulb(* ) - 71 Construction quality Tight Wind speed (mph) 15.0 7.5 Fireplaces 1 (Tight) Construction descriptions Or Area U-value Insul R Ht9 HTM Loss Clg HTM Gain to BwMt2-°F ftZ*F/Btuh Btuhlftt Btuh Btuh/ft" Btuh Walls 1217-0sw: Frm wall, vnl ext, r-21 cav ins, 1/2" gypsum board int fnsh, ne 607 0.065 21.0 5.52 3355 0.89 539 2"x6" wood frm se 294 0.065 21.0 5.52 1623 0.89 261 sw 500 0.065 21.0 5.52 2762 0.89 443 nw 261 0.065 21.0 5.52 1442 0.89 232 nw 304 0.065 21.0 0 0 -0.2 -59 all 1966 0.065 21.0 4.67 9181 0.72 1415 15B-10sfc-8: Bg wall, heavy dry or light damp soil, concrete wall, no 480 0.050 10.0 4.25 2040 0 0 r-10 ins, 8" thk se 304 0.050 10.0 4.25 1292 0 0 sw 480 0.050 10.0 4.25 2040 0 0 all 1179 0.050 10.0 4.05 4775 0 0 Partitions (none) Windows Stonehaven: VINYL Insulated Glass Double Hung; NFRC rated ne 41 0.290 0 24.6 1006 21.8 889 (SHGC=0.30) nw 61 0.290 0 24.6 1495 21.8 1322 all 101 0.290 0 24.6 2500 21.8 2211 Stonehaven: VINYL Insulated Glass Double Hung; NFRC rated se 29 0.290 0 24.6 703 25.0 713 (SHGC=0.26) sw 87 0.290 0 24.6 2149 25.0 2180 nw 41 0.290 0 24.6 1011 19.4 795 all 157 0.290 0 24.6 3862 23.5 3688 Stonehaven: VINYL Insulated Glass Double Hung; NFRC rated sw 40 0.290 0 24.6 986 27.5 1098 (SHGC=0.29) nw 40 0.290 0 24.6 986 21.2 848 nw 24 0.290 0 24.6 592 21.2 509 all 104 0.290 0 24.7 2564 23.6 2455 Doors 11JO: Door, mtl fbrgl type se 20 0.600 6.3 51.0 1012 14.9 296 sw 21 0.600 6.3 51.0 1071 14.9 313 all 41 0.600 6.3 51.0 2083 14.9 609 ~ ~k-- -FT1- wrrightsnft- Right•SulteOUniversal 8.0.04RSU13410 2012-pct-0812:45:50 fR.C l~ ElanderlDesktop%Wrightsoft Heat LosslLennar Kingston Eagan.rup Calc = MJB Front Door faces: Page t Cellin s 16OR-44ad: Attic ceiling, asphalt shingles roof mat, r-44 cell ins, 1742 0.022 44.0 1.87 3258 0.84 1470 518" gypsum board int fnsh Floors 2013-38c: Fir floor, frm fir, 12" thkns, carpet fir fnsh, r-5 ext ins, r-38 144 0.030 38.0 2.55 367 0.25 36 cav ins, amb ovr 21A-32t: Bg floor, light dry soil, 8' depth 1598 0.020 0 1.70 2717 0 0 lj~ -Fk wrightsoft• Right-Suite@Universal 8.0.04RSU13410 2012-Oct-08 12:46:50 ACCA ElandeADesktoplWrightsoft Heat Loss\Lennar Kingston Eagan.rup Calc = MJe Front Door faces: Page 2 0 r> p N 04 U M Co a 3: ti lh 04 a 1 .A tV O 7 t L N LLJ m b I N 2 LL p 0 Lo +p 0 C O N C~ 3 a, 4 Q U O O w a a BCL. ! Z V Q _O Z z U a LL1 0 U Q Z „QJ o Q LLI Y Q c9 a 0 C) s g 0 3: O rn m 4 y J N cli ~4. 0 N Xv to x v N O X o.> LL M ~y Z n X X X X X X m - ~ O m C, (D CO ti V' V' N 'tr I~ W LO w W W W W W w w w w LL a u 0 0 o 0 0 0 o a 0 0 MC) W U m Z z z z z Z Z z z z 0 N M Ll.. Q (X Co U) Z Z ~,M z L¢ L! CD 2m : to Ct) i N z a N 1 g N N a p d3 C E d Li Cl) `U' - N N O 0 co tL Z Q V 0 a a N ~ u1 a E GL BL CL 16 C7 ui O N o" 0 ci U t t U G H i°~ 1- U H W Cl) U) a) j Z p U C? F- cat Cj I- < J u M co M C0 O C~ C.) to CU M U Q W o CO L11 M O. iw to $ N ad z ti ¢ p ti co co U) 0) -`z i d o w z z z z a z LL 1 , x z z ?i z z x z zz o .rQJ'.;; Q ip ti: p to Q) u. cn w LL w w O IL v ,Q Mp Q 2 iz iz o o _ zo co C, _I t-- D.. ! J ! O N ; M N f!) N co Q) N 0 N M Q . C fll N Q i y r' u- N U. a Q, N C3 Z f„~ 3 b c- O O 4 > c a) 0 a. ~ a a Q r ''C! x x Xo X x x X C3 x U Q C~ I`= 7± E 8) cbo M tr V o N M co 8 IL rn U) _ LOT SURVEY CHECKLIST FOR RESIDENTIAL BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION PROPERTY LEGAL: 4-W'gK 3 , 54wt1aak z /d A DATE OF SURVEY: 9/ / z- LATEST REVISION: as a~ c ca , U_ Q Z o z a DOCUMENT STANDARDS ❑ ❑ Registered Land Surveyor signature and company 0 0 Building Permit Applicant ❑ 0 • Legal description 0 0 • Address ,B 0 0 • North arrow and scale 0 ❑ • House type (rambler, walkout, split w/o, split entry, lookout, etc.) ,P1 0 0 • Directional drainage arrows with slope/gradient % 0 0 • Proposed/existing sewer and water services & invert elevation 0 0 • Street name 0 0 • Driveway (grade & width - in R/W and back of curb, 22' max.) 0 0 • Lot Square Footage 0 ❑ • Lot Coverage ELEVATIONS Existing 0 ❑ • Property corners 0 ❑ * Top of curb at the driveway and property line extensions ❑ ❑ • Elevations of any existing adjacent homes 0 ❑ • Adequate footing depth of structures due to adjacent utility trenches 0 Rf ❑ • Waterways (pond, stream, etc.) Proposed ❑ ❑ • Garage floor 0 0 • Basement floor ❑ 0 • Lowest exposed elevation (walkout/window) 0 0 • Property corners 0 0 • Front and rear of home at the foundation PONDING AREA (if applicable) 0 • Easement line 0 'z 0 • NWL 0 21 0 • HWL ❑ ❑ • Pond # designation ❑ 0 • Emergency Overflow Elevation 0 ~e1 0 • Pond/Wetland buffer delineation Y • Shoreland Zoning Overlay District Y • Conservation Easements DIMENSIONS ,d ❑ 0 • Lot lines/Bearings & dimensions ❑ 0 • Right-of-way and street width (to back of curb) ❑ ❑ • Proposed home dimensions including any proposed decks, overhangs greater than 2', porches, etc. (i.e. all structures requiring permanent footings) 0 0 • Show all easements of record and any City utilities within those easements ( ❑ ❑ • Setbacks of proposed structure and eyard setback of adjacent existing structures 0 ❑ • Retaining wall requirements: Reviewed By: Date /0 GJFORMSBuilding Permit Application Rev. 11-26-04 PISNEERengineefing CIVIL ENGINEERS LAND PLANNERS LAND SURVEYORS LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS 2422 Enterprise Drive, Mendota Heights, MN 55120, Phone: (651) 681 1914 Fax: (651) 681 9488 - Pioneereng.com Certificate of Survey for: LENN HOMES ADDRESS: 3545 and 3549 SAWGRASS TRAIL EAST, EAGAN, MN BUYER: N ODEL: 1622 ELEVATION: 131- B2 11 if F7 A I LOT 3 LOT 4 E ! „ LOT AREA =5969 SF LOT AREA =5890 SF HOUSE AREA =2107 SF HOUSE AREA =2123 SF PORCH AREA =144 SF PORCH AREA =144 SF SIDEWALK AREA =202 SF SIDEWALK AREA =202 SF Qi DRIVEWAY AREA =501 SF DRIVEWAY AREA =520 SF BENCH MARK~'•AGAN EN EE1t1NG DF1'T STOOP AREA =39 SF STOOP AREA =39 SF COVERAGE =50.1% COVERAGE =51.4% TOP PR EAND4AINTAIN BUILDING COVERAGE =37.7% BUILDING COVERAGE =38.5% ELEV.tl, , PRO N UNTIL 140.18 T STMI'LISHED 02157"E 00 D~ -7 VACANT i ` to go to ~ ~ ~ I (899-3)/ 30.58 'o = OD S B97 I N d I o (89189)3 72.01 - 1 98.0 -I-.->_-In ~L 8903 6 1 toap J4;63 ~97~ II h - I O ' 38.71 r I O r X 1 m _ 30.5 I o 1 110 x 891.4 0 00 / 6.67 _ 0- I 9-6 .P I I o X2.00 "Q C. _ 0'' r p ri~I CP C1 ° o C TI " `JD m I I 00 oo ; m ~ ~ 9,~1,, c 0 698.s I I I -1v V- 3 0~0 W'. Imo tox N o o r' x(40.01 a I I my ago olrj'07'E 71.00 SEE of 89s1e I - I (Tl 1, m ~ X15.00 N82 70 00 AI o ism fir cnlovv ~o v ~v 37.6 , . ' P S 0D ~va-k ' \ NI I I m I m o - ao / o 0 1, 11 o Z _ .00 -I- / \ _ t3ti > ~~/~I1 01/ . maw { A c [Aj ( X to Cr1 T] C ~I 0/ r' Cjl, ~1 898.4 _ 33. cot 6. B* 0 B- 12.0o too 14.62 v 38. 0. Spp •c o It o ~9~~, 71/ CA _ 6 6y FZ.0. ~ 0 '11(994.8) \50 ao so E,,.. ~ '10 I ■ ■ 00♦ 0 i - - 0 900.1) BENCH MARK:,'-4--z WW- .00 TOP OF SPI%,. u L - 3.1 o I a . 72 5 1 4.3) - t----_ ELEV.=898.031"- r- R' - 0oR 0 n 00 r e966 I L -1 \ I 1 \ 1 i r I w r L--^II P HOUSED II r'o 00 Ali ST~~ !!Hold up grade to ao ,0.08 maintain 4:1 slope li 06 ~.r 15.00 ' away from proposed ' 140• building on lot 4. S82'1 rJ' D7"W \ o i \ 01 00 DETAIL - f NOT TO SCALE BENCH MARK: TOP NUT HYDRANT LOT 1 BLK 3 LOWEST ALLOWABLE FLOOR ELEVATION :892.8 ELEV.=900.36 NOTE: ADD FOUNDATION LEDGE AS REQUIRED HOUSE ELEVATIONS : (PROPOSED) /ASBUILT NOTE: GRADING PLAN BY PIONEER ENGINEERING LAST DATED WAS USED LOWEST FLOOR ELEVATION : (893.3) TO DETERMINE THE PROPOSED ELEVATIONS SHOWN ON THIS CERTIFICATE. TOP OF FOUNDATION ELEV. (901.3) NOTE: PROPOSED BUILDING DIMENSIONS SHOWN ARE FOR HORIZONTAL LOCATION OF STRUCTURES ON THE LOT ONLY. CONTACT BUILDER PRIOR TO GARAGE SLAB ELEV. ® DOOR : (901.0) CONSTRUCTION FOR APPROVED CONSTRUCTION PLANS. NOTE: NO SPECIFIC SOILS INVESTIGATION HAS BEEN PERFORMED ON THIS LOT BY THE SURVEYOR. THE SUITABILITY OF SOILS TO SUPPORT THE SPECIFIC HOUSE PROPOSED IS NOT THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE SURVEYOR. M W ■i ■ M DENOTES PROPOSED RETAINING WALL DESIGNED AND BUILT BY OTHERS NOTE: THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT PURPORT TO SHOW EASEMENTS OTHER THAN THOSE SHOWN ON THE RECORDED PLAT. X 000.00 DENOTES EXISTING ELEVATION NOTE: CONTRACTOR MUST VERIFY DRIVEWAY DESIGN. ( 000.00 ) DENOTES PROPOSED ELEVATION DENOTES DRAINAGE FLOW DIRECTION NOTE: BEARINGS SHOWN ARE BASED ON AN ASSUMED DATUM A DENOTES SPIKE WE HEREBY CERTIFY TO LENNAR HOMES THAT THIS IS A TRUE AND CORRECT REPRESENTATION OF A SURVEY OF THE BOUNDARIES OF: LOT 3-4, BLOCK 3, STONEHAVEN 2ND ADDITION DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA IT DOES NOT PURPORT TO SHOW IMPROVEMENTS OR ENCROACHMENTS, EXCEPT AS SHOWN, AS SURVEYED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION THIS 6TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2012. REVISED: NOTE: SIGNED: P NEER ENGINEERING, P.A. 9/11/12 STAKE HOUSE SCALE 1 INCH = 30 FEET BY: 7299 111120008 Peter J. Hawkinson License No. 42299 March 14, 2013 Lennar Corporation 16305 36th Ave N, Suite 600 Plymouth, MN 55446 I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly licensed professional engineer under the laws of the Stat'ofJ ilnnes9ta. Date: Nick Sanson 3-14-13 Minnesota Registration No. 46665 Attn: Rodney Chwialkowski Subject: Foundation Wall Assessment 3549/3545 Sawgrass Trail, Eagan, MN Hanson Group Project: 3.062 To Whom It May Concern: rrL O o X2('0(0' The purpose of this letter is to report the findings of a structural engineering review of the existing condition of the interior shared house foundation wall at the above address. ASSIGNMENT The Hanson Group has been retained to provide a structural engineering review of the existing cracked condition of the shared foundation wall toward the rear of the walkout at 3549/3545 Sawgrass Trail in Eagan, MN, as directed by Rodney Chwialkowski of Lennar Corporation. BACKGROUND The above referenced home is currently under construction. Cracking of the rear intersection of the shared house foundation wall between the two residences was noticed by the City who is requesting that an independent structural engineer assess the condition of this area and comment on the foundation wall. DESCRIPTION The residence is a multi -family house with a two-story wood framed structure with a full height basement at the front and walkout to the rear. The foundation walls are concrete cast -in -p ace with a concrete slab -on -grade floor in the lower level. Lennar Corporation Hanson Group Project: 3.062 March 14, 2013 Page 2 OBSERVATION AND COMMENTS 1. The following information is reported by the Building Official and Builder. This information was given to the Hanson Group to use in the assessment. Informatio has not been verified but is being included as part of the basis of the conclusions. the Hanson Group immediately should any information in this report be deemed inaccurate. a The foundation wall in question is 14" thick concrete cast -in-place at the s units and is approximately 8'-4" tall with a concrete slab -on -grade baseme that has been installed after the cracking occurred. b. The 14" cast -in-place concrete foundation walls are reinforced with (2) ro horizontal bars (at the top and bottom). The engineering specifications us: the concrete contractor were submitted to the City for review and referen to the foundation being poured. c. The foundation was inspected, poured, and shortly afterward stripped of a and temporarily shored. The footing is unreinforced and constructed of ca place concrete. d. The interior shared foundation wall was reportedly poured monolithically rear walkout wall. The strip footing is approximately 42"-48" below grade equal backfill on each side and steps up to bottom -of -slab elevation appro 48" inside of the basement. Earlier in 2013 a horizontal crack was formed interior shared wall of the rear walkout intersection. The horizontal crack was approximately %2" to 1". A photograph of the crack prior to the epoxy injection was provided by the Builder and is included in this report for refe e. Heat was then introduced into the basement and the crack became relativ: flush. Rezi-Weld LV State epoxy was injected at the crack location of the in wall. The concrete slab -on -grade was installed. The manufacturer's produ is included in this report as reference material. The contractor reports that requirements and procedures on this document were followed. f. The concrete contractor indicates an fc'=4,000 psi compressive strength mi ordered and utilized for the walls. No batch ticket or mix design was availa review. given ontact ared t floor s of #4 d by e prior forms t-in- ith ith mately tthe ffset nce. ly erior t data all was Ie for 2. The following information was obtained through a site visit on March 12th, 2013 b Nick Hanson, PE of The Hanson Group: a. The site visit included visual observation of a very limited portion of the ex foundation wall around the interior and the rear exposed area from the ext that did not have backfill at the multi -family residence. b. The foundation wall at this location was measured with a 48" level and fou be approximately plumb across the level as determined at the exterior intersection and at each side of the interior foundation wall. sed rior d to Lennar Corporation Hanson Group Project: 3.062 March 14, 2013 Page 3 c. The grade is relatively level along the rear and was held approximately 6"- "down from the top of the rear walkout foundation wall. d. The rear frost walkout wall is 8" thick concrete cast -in-place as measured at the rear patio doors. e. Grade is reportedly a sandy -clay material (Group 11) and suitable for bearing and backfill. It is reported that sand material was used as backfill within the arta and properly compacted. The soils within this area visually appeared to be con stent with a Sandy -Clay classification based on the top soils exposed. f. The crack at the interior wall appeared to be epoxy injected from three sid s. Due to the in-place epoxy, it was not possible to determine if the offset was still present. The crack was near the top -of -slab elevation at the inside and approximately 8" above grade at the exterior. Approximately 6"-9" of the horizontal crack was visible until the slab -on -grade and rear wall wood fram ng covered the remaining portion. g. No water intrusion was noted or reported at the rear intersecting crack in question. No movement of the framing materials above was noted or reported during the construction and after the wall was permanently in place. Standing surface water/ice did appear present toward the rear of the structure. 3. The following information is noted in regard to the above observed conditions: a. A foundation wall of this nature is intended to primarily support vertical loads with little horizontal loading requirements and no lateral soil pressures at the exterior due to the balance fill below grade. b.Based on the above reported information, the foundation wall in question likely resulted from frost heave at the high stepped footing location due to a lack of heat present to prevent frost. The introduction of heat reportedly brought the crack back closer to the original condition. The frost protection measures af'the Code require that the interior of the basement be a heated structure. The interior should continue to have heat present throughout the life of the structure to prevent future frost heaves. c. The epoxy injection should have regained structural continuity and strengthened the wall. The structural injection resin labeled above and reportedly used by the contractor appears to be an acceptable epoxy injection material for this type, of crack provided standard manufacturer recommended practices to be comp etely followed. A photo of the epoxy injected crack taken during the site observations is included in this report for reference. d. The reported orientation of the crack indicates that it was suitable for epoxy injection as a method to re-establish continuity. No substances (water, sealants, paint, etc.) were reported on the wall that would inhibit a suitable epoxy -to - concrete bond provided standard manufacturer recommended practices to be completely followed. The crack, in its current condition, will not dramatica ly Lennar Corporation Hanson Group Project: 3.062 March 14, 2013 Page 4 inhibit the ability of the foundation wall to perform its necessary functions to resist the required Toads. e. All waterproofing measures are not discussed in this document as they are non- structural and outside our expertise. All waterproofing issues and measures are to be the responsibility of the contractor. PROFESSIONAL OPINION 4. It is our professional engineering opinion that the existing interior/shared foundation wall at the rear intersection of the walkout wall of the multi -family residence noted appears to be structurally adequate and currently performing its intended function as of the date of the observations. The means and methods of the epoxy injection are out of the scope of this report, and all manufacturer's recommendations are to be closely followed for the product to fully re-establish the structural continuity sufficiently. GENERAL 5. The observations and opinions expressed in this report are based on our professional engineering judgment and professional practice, as well as limited visual observations of exposed materials only. 6. No other engineering was performed or requested for this project. This document pertains to the general assessment of the exposed crack at the existing residence IDcated above only. The Hanson Group was not present during the injection process, nor do we warranty any of the contractors work or methods. All waterproofing and verification, as well as means and methods of application, are the responsibility of the owner and/or contractor. 7. All work shall be done in accordance with this document, standard industry practice, and the requirements of the Code. 8. These conclusions are based on preliminary and limited examination and analysis described above. We reserve the right to supplement and/or amend these findings and/or opinions should new information become available. Concealed discrepancies and/or defects limit the accuracy and scope of this report. If you have any questions, please contact us. Sincerely, The Hanlon Group Nick Hanson, PE Lennar Corporation Hanson Group Project: 3.062 March 14, 2013 Page 5 Photo 1: Crack prior to epoxy injection Photo 2: Crack after epoxy injection W. R. MEADOWS. .■.111111111111 NO. 392-S CSI Code: 03 64 23 REZI-WELD, LV STATE Ultra -Low Viscosity Injection Epoxy DESCRIPTION REZI-WELD LV STATE is an ultra-low viscosity, rapid setting, epoxy -based, structural injection resin. This anchoring adhesive and injection resin is moisture insensitive and provides high mechanical properties and bond strength to concrete and various other substrates. REZI-WELD LV STATE resists most chemicals and forms a structural monolithic bond. USES REZI-WELD LV STATE is designed for gravity feeding or pressure injecting using two -component metering pumps, hand-held bulk guns, or pressure pots. It is suitable for injecting fine, non-moving structural cracks for long-term repairs. REZI-WELD LV STATE makes an economical, easy-to-use epoxy mortar for patching or repairing defects in concrete substrates. SPECIFICATIONS • ASTM C 881 Type I, II, IV and V, Grade 1, Classes B & C • AASHTO M 235 Type I, II, IV and V, Grade 1, Classes B & C • Various departments of transportation approvals FEATURESBENEFITS • Ultra-low viscosity is ideal for pressure injection and gravity feeding. • Advantageous as a low viscosity, epoxy adhesive binder. • Bonds cured concrete or metal to concrete. • Combines with aggregate to form an interior non- skid topping. • Resists industrial chemicals, as well as impact and attack from moisture. • Features low -viscosity, high -modulus, high- strength, self -leveling characteristics. • Furnished in two convenient cartridge sizes. COVERAGE • One gallon (3.8 L) neat covers approximately 85- 100 ft.2/gal. (2.09-2.66 m2/L), depending on surface porosity and end use application. • One gallon (3.8 L) mixed with 1:1 with dry aggregate yields approx. 350 in.3 (5735 cm3) of grout. AUGUST 2009 (Supersedes November 2004) SHELF LIFE (TYPICAL) One year in unopened cartridge, stored between 40° F and 95° F (4° and 35° C). PACKAGING 15 Oz. (450 mL) Cartridge 6.3 Oz. (190 mL) Cartridge 3 Gallon (11.4 L) Unit 15 Gallon (57 L) Unit CARTRIDGE APPLICATION Surface Preparation ... All surfaces to be bonded must be free of standing water and completely clean of dirt, rust, curing compounds, grease, oil, paint, waxes, and other materials which would prevent an optimal bond. Concrete should be prepared by mechanical abrading or high pressure water jetting to a sound surface. Vacuum or blow dust away with oil -free compressec air. Mechanically abrade metal base plates to a bight metal finish. Exposed steel surfaces should be sandblasted and vacuumed clean; if not possible, degrease the surface and use sandpaper or a wire brush to reveal continuous, bright metal. Mixing... The resin and hardener (containedin the cartridge) must be conditioned between 65°F and 85° F (18° C - 29° C) at the time of application. Use the double -boiler method, or store material in a warm room, prior to application. Hand shake cartridge before use. APPLICATION METHOD 1. Substrate temperature must be 40° F (4° C) and rising at the time of application. 2. Ensure static mixer nozzle is free of obstructions. 3. Remove nose cap. 4. Remove nose plug. 5. Insert static mixer onto cartridge nose. Slide retaining nut (located in sealed bag) down static mixer shaft. 6. Tighten retaining nut onto cartridge nose. 7. Load into standard dual cartridge dispenser tool. 8. Dispense and discard approximately a 3" bead of material until a uniform amber color is achieved. 9. Re-insert nose plug and seal with nose cap to seal a partially used cartridge. 10. Follow all instructions prior to application of partially used cartridge. CONTINUED ON REVERSE SIDE... W. R. MEADOWS, INC. P.O. Box 338 • HAMPSHIRE, IL 60140-0338 Phone: 847/214-2100 • Fax: 847/683-4544 1-800-342-5976 www.wrmeadows.com HAMPSHIRE, IL / CARTERSVILLE, GA / YORK, PA FORT WORTH, TX / BENICIA, CA / POMONA, CA GOODYEAR, AZ / MILTON, ON / ST. ALBERT, AB TECHNICAL DATA* !PROPERTY 1 7 Day Cure @ 77° F (25° C) Viscosity, cps Tensile Strength, psi !Elongation, % Hardness, Shore D Flexural Strength, psi !Compressive Yield Strength, psi Compressive Modulus, psi Bond Strength, psi (2 days) ;Bond Strength, psi (14 days) !,Heat Deflection Temperature Absorption, % (24 hours) 'Linear Coefficient of Shrinkage PAGE 2 ... REZI-WELD LV STATE #392-S ... AUGUST 2009 Typical Data 500 7000 (48.3 MPa) 2.0 85 8500 (55.2 MPa) 12,000 (82.7 MPa) Test Method ASTM C 881 ASTM D 638 260,000 (1800 MPa) 2350 (17.25 MPa) 3000 (22.08 MPa) 120° F (50° C) ASTM D 638 ASTM D 2240 ASTM D 790 ASTM D 695 ASTMD695 ASTM C 882 ASTM C 882 ASTM D 648 0.85% ASTM D 570 0.004 'ASTM D 2566 Component Properties Resin Hardener Mix Ratio (PBV=Part by Vol.) 2 PBV Appearance Pot Life (100 gms) @ 75° F 1(23.9° C) *All technical data is typical information, but may vary due to testing methods, conditions, and operators. Crack Injecting ... Epoxy can be gravity fed into horizontal cracks that are small (1/4" [6.35 mm] maximum width) and have a limited depth. For large injection projects, self -proportioning, mixing and pressure injection equipment is recommended. For small injection projects, REZI-WELD (IP) from W. R. MEADOWS may be suitable. Gravity Feed ... Seal underside of elevated slab prior to filling if cracks reflect full depth. Pour neat, properly mixed and conditioned REZI-WELD LV STATE into v -notched crack. Continue placement until completely filled. Interior, Non -Skid Topping ... Apply at a rate not to exceed 100 ft.2/gal. (2.66 m2/L). Then apply layer of sand or grit over epoxy and allow epoxy to cure. Blow or vacuum excess sand away. NOTE: REZI-WELD LV STATE IS NOT TO BE USED AS A FINISHED FLOOR COVERING OR PROTECTIVE TREATMENT. 1 PBV Clear 30 min. Amber Aggregates for Epoxy -Resin Mortars ... Combine clean, dry aggregates with freshly mixed epoxy in a ratio of one part epoxy to 4 - 5 parts, by volume, of graded aggregates (not to exceed six parts sand). Patch thickness should not exceed 1.5" (50.5 mm per lift. Cleanup ... Clean tools and equipment im ediately with toluene or xylene. Clean equipment a�ay from all ignition sources and avoid breathing vapors or allowing epoxy -containing solvent to contact skin. c hould this material come in contact with skin, wash thbtoughly with soap and water, not solvent. PRECAUTIONS DO NOT DILUTE. Mix complete units onl Not recommended for use when the concrete temperature has been below 40° F (4° C) for the past 24 hours. Do not use to seal cracks under hydrostatic pressure. D4 not warm epoxy over direct heat. REZI-WELD LV S'f TE is not to be used as an exterior coating, as it is not res stant to ultraviolet rays. HEALTH HAZARDS This epoxy is corrosive. Personal protectiv equipment is necessary. Unused epoxy will generate eicessive heat, especially in large quantities. Unused epoxy should be mixed with dry sand in the container to help lower heat. Refer to Material Safety Data Sheet for complete health and safety information. LEED INFORMATION May help contribute to LEED credits: ■ EQ Credit 4.1: Low Emitting Material;:' Adhesives and Sealants MR Credit 5.1: Regional Materials: 10% Extracted, Processed & Manufactured Regionally MR Credit 5.2: Regional Materials: 20% Extracted, Processed & Manufactured Regionally For most recent data sheet, further LEED information, and MSDS, visit www.wrmeadows.com. LIMITED WARRANTY "W. R. MEADOWS, INC. warrants at the time and place we make shipment, our material will be of good quality and will conform with our published specifications in force on the date of acceptance of the order." Read complete warranty. Copy furnished upon request. Disclaimer The information contained herein is included for illustrative purposes only, and to the best of our knowledge, is accurate and reliable. W. R. MEADOWS, INC. cannot however under any circumstances make any guarantee of results or assume any obligation or liability in connection with the use of this information. As W. R. MEADOWS, INC. has no control over the use to which others may put its product, it is recommended that the products be tested to determine if suitable for specific application and/or our information is valid in a particular circumstance. Responsibility remains with the architect or engineer, contractor and owner for the design, application and proper installation of each product. Specifier and user shall determine the, suitability of products for specific application and assume all responsibilities in connection therewith. © W. R. MEADOWS 2004 8/09-4M *City oiBaQo Address: 3545 Sawgrass Tr E Zip: 55123 Permit #: 107675 The following items were / were not completed at the Final Inspection on: 6/21//3 Final grade - 6" from siding v (111 4 11L 0h 00h Permanent steps — Garage Permanent steps — Main Entry Permanent Driveway Permanent Gas Retaining Wall or 3:1 Max Slope Sod / Seeded Lawn Trail / Curb Damage // l 7< Porch Lower Level Finish Deck Fireplace • Verify with your builder that roof test caps from the plumbing system have been removed. • Turn off water supply to the outside lawn faucets before freeze potential exists. • Call the Engineering Department at (651) 675-5646 prior to working in the right-of-way or installing an irrigation system. Building Inspector: G:\Building Inspections\FORMS\Checklists