Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
09/05/1995 - City Council Regular
AGENDA EAGAN CITY COUNCIL - REGULAR MEETING BLACK HAWK MIDDLE SCHOOL*** SEPTEMBER 5, 1995 6:30 P.M. I. ROLL CALL & PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE II. ADOPT AGENDA & APPROVAL OF MINUTES (BLUE) III. VISITORS TO BE HEARD (10 MINUTE TOTAL TIME LIMIT) IV. DEPARTMENT HEAD BUSINESS (BLUE) A. DISCUSSION ON Carriage Hills as a Municipal Golf Course V. CONSENT AGENDA (PINK) A. PERSONNEL ITEMS 4 B. PLUMBERS LICENSES 7 C. SPECIAL HUNTING PERMITS: Shawn Hunter, Norman E. Svien, Gregory J. Arens, Brian Collins, Stephen Huettl VD. RESOLUTION, Changing Council Meeting Date from September 19 to September 20, ' 1995 la E. APPOINTMENT, Gun Club Watershed Management Organization �I 3 F. CHANGE ORDERS, Police Department/Municipal Center Expansion /` G. AUTHORIZE BURNSVILLE-Eagan Cable Communications Commission Standstill Agree- ment, Cable Franchise Renewal Process It H. PROJECT 692, Present Feasibility Report, Order Public Hearing, Old Sibley Highway Streets and Sanitary Sewer 3,)"I. PROJECT 567R, Approve Condemnation Settlement, Effress Addition Storm Sewer i0 J. PROJECT 675, Receive Final Assessment Roll, Order Public Hearing, Red Oaks 7 Addition Streets and Utilities K. CONTRACT 95-13, Approve Plans, Authorize Advertisement for Bids, Gardenwood F°j2� Dr ive Utilities 'j L. APPROVE JOINT Powers Agreement, Runway 4/22 Mediation Survey M. APPROVE Resolution to issue and sell General Obligation Improvement Bonds, Series 1995A, General Obligation Equipment Certificates of Indebtedness, F Series 1995B and General Obligation Improvement Refunding Bonds, Series 1995C. f'10 N. FINAL SUBDIVISION, Centex Vermillion, located east of Highway 13, west of Robin Lane, and north of Shannon Glen Condominiums. 4/5.0. CONTRACT 93-KK, Acknowledge Completion, Authorize City Maintenance, f. 444 P. Stonebridge Ponds Streets and Utilities rYCONTRACT 94-02, Authorize Final Payment, Violet Lane and Yankee Doodle Road 11Q. CONTRACT 93-ZZ, Acknowledge Completion, Authorize City Maintenance, Safari � At Eagan 2nd Addition Utilities ' C�8 R. CONTRACT 93-I, Acknowledge Completion, Authorize City Maintenance; Lexington P Pointe 9th Addition Streets and Utilities 1 1JG S. CONTRACT 92-I, Acknowledge Completion, Authorize City Maintenance; Weston l 7 Hills Streets and Utilities OT. CONTRACT 94-EE, Acknowledge Completion, Authorize City Maintenance; Trails End Road Streets and Utilities �p SI U. REFUSE HAULERS Commercial Licenses, UWS Transfer Inc. and Waste Control 1- • Systems, St. Paul S 41. CIGARETTE LICENSES, Applebaum Companies dba Big Top Liquor, 3900 Beau D'Rue Drive; and Sidco, Inc. Big Top Liquor, 1282 Town Centre Drive s W. HOLZ FARM Structural Analysis X. CONTRACT 94-03, Authorize Final Payment, Blackhawk and .Blue Cross Road OM ') Utility and Street Reconstruction i'' 91 Y. CONTRACT 94-M, Acknowledge Completion, Authorize City Maintenance, Stonebridge Ponds 2nd Addition Streets and Utilities 'j_Q Z. CONTRACT 93-E, Acknowledge Completion, Authorize City Maintenance, Weston rHills Second Addition Streets and Utilities VI. 7:00 - PUBLIC HEARINGS (SALMON) `/ A. VACATE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY and Pond Easements, Coventry Pass 5th Addition Iry VII. OLD BUSINESS (ORCHID) 4 A. COMPREHENSIVE GUIDE PLAN AMENDMENT, Preliminary Planned Development and rPreliminary Subdivision, OCP Homes, Inc./Oakpointe of Eagan, located west of Galaxie Avenue, east of Plaza Drive and south of Cliff Road 1'71. B. REQUEST TO RECONSIDER, PRELIMINARY PLANNED DEVELOPMENT, Ray Connelly Realty and PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION, Soderholm Addition, located between Lexington Way and Lexington Avenue on the north side of Diffley Road VIII. NEW BUSINESS (TAN) e• 14 A. CONTRACT 95-12, Consider Logo/Name Options, Deerwood Reservoir (p! B. CERTIFICATION of proposed 1996 Property Tax Levy, Proposed 1996 Budget; Set �• Truth in Taxation Hearing Dates '�' C. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT, Adams Outdoor Advertising, for an off-premise pylon 1 , advertising sign on Soo Line eight-of-way located south of I-494, west of Highway 55. rr D. COMPREHENSIVE GUIDE PLAN AMENDMENT, City of Eagan, changing the land use I `` designation from D-1, Single Family Residential to Industrial for 20 acres on Lots 1-5, Block 1 and Lots 1-4, Block 2, Halley's Addition and PID # 10- 03600-021-79 and 10-03600-022-79 ( Z?E. PRELIMINARY PLANNED DEVELOPMENT, Blue Cross Blue Shield, and PRELIMINARY r SUBDIVISION, RiverPark Office Center, for four office buildings at 3400 Yankee Drive, west of Highway 13 and south of Yankee Doodle Road 113F. PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION, DeLosh Addition, located south of Highridge Terrace rand north of Skyline Road II. LEGISLATIVE/INTERGOVERNMENTAL AFFAIRS UPDATE (GREY) I. ADMINISTRATIVE AGENDA (GREEN) II. VISITORS TO BE HEARD (for those persons not on agenda) III. ADJOURNMENT The City of Eagan is committed to the policy that all persons have equal access to its programs, services, activities, facilities and employment without regard to race, color, creed, religion, national origin, sex, disability, age, marital status, sexual orientation, or status with regard to public assistance. Auxiliary aids for persons with disabilities will be provided upon advance notice of at least 96 hours. If a notice of less than 96 hours is received, the City of Eagan will attempt to provide such aid. ***Note change in location. MEMO TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCILMEMBERS FROM: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES DATE: AUGUST 31, 1995 SUBJECT: AGENDA INFORMATION FOR THE SEPTEMBER 5,1995 CITY COUNCIL MEETING ... .:,OIV AG AAPPR.,.'OVMINUTES After approval of the September 5, 1995 City Council agenda and the August 15, 1995 regular and special City Council meeting minutes, the following items are in order for consideration. i MINUTES OF'A itatii MEE11N4 OF THE EAAAN, CITY COUNCI#''-;: Eagan, Minnesota "" :Nigust 15, 1995...::;:;;;::: A regular meeting of the Eagan City Cocitig'i . :.44:iii1t'Tuesday,August 15, 1995 at 6:30 p.m. at Black Hawk Middle School. Present were Mayor Epiit irtcdCouncilmembers Wachter, Awada, Masin, and Hunter. Also present were City Administrator Tom Hedges, Senior Planner Mike Ridley,Assistant Director of Public Works Mike Foertsch, and City Attorney Jim Sheldon. Hunter moved, Masin seconded a motion tb; drove thi.egenda as presented. Aye: 5 Nay: 0 Councilmember Awada requested ;: tr: :8ietitiment'':i ii page 4, last paragraph to read, 'Councilmember Awada noted that treehole:iniosquitos ntilillijti:bfeed encephalitis.' She also requested that the words or to stay in the district.' be added to the end of that paragraph on page 5. Awada moved, Hunter seconded a motion to approve the minutes as amended. Aye: 5 Nay: 0 i . :Au � a> €:995:< l:jl .h:.#ic < EEVI4•• Hunter moved, Wachter seconded a:thatlon to approve the minutes as presented. Aye: 5 Nay: O . In regard to Item Y, Vacate Sidewalk empnt.•.P k:enter Addition, Councilmember Wachter asked for an explanation as to why this is neeqatkeikl:i4titilatit Director of Public Works Foertsch gave an explanation. . In regard to Item Z, Contract 95-12, Councilmember Wachter asked whether this is the ultimate design, and Assistant Director of Public Works Foertsch indicated it is. A. Personnel Items Item 1. It was recommended to approve he: %iiing:t f:$, eiabq.terse named as Skating School Director in the Parks and Recreation Department. Item 2. It was recommended to approve the hiring o; liondreiinn as a temporary program assistant. B. Plumbers Licenses. It was recommended to approve the pluMbers licenses for Murr Plumbing, Inc.,Park Plumbing Inc., and Whelan-Davis Co., as presented. C. Contract 95-07. Nicols Road Contract Award. It was recommended to receive the bids for Contract 95- 07, award the contract to the lowest responsible bidder and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute all related documents. D. project 691. Clemson Drive Streets arc,Utllitips. it was reommended to receive the feasibility report for Project 691 and schedule a public healti 3 fr S 01.1?*1 ;:1995. E. Project 690. Walden Heights Storm Sewer. It was recommended to receive the feasibility report for Project 690 and schedule a public hearing for September 19;1095. EAGAN CRY COUNCIL MINUTES;AUGUST 15,1995:%.*:':::::*: PAGE 2 F. Contract 95-10.Woodaate Lane Street ROknstruction. ft was recommended to approve the plans and specifications for Contract 95-10 and author120:44 advertiserp4lor a competitive bid opening to be held at 10:30 am. on September 14, 1995. G. Project 688. Eaaandale Corporate Center Addition Streets and Utilities. It was recommended to receive the feasibility report for Project 688 and schedule a public hearing for September 19, 1995. H. Project 693. Cedar Grove 11 and 12 Adcifficri Streetlights. It was recommended to receive a petition from residents of the Cedar Grove 11th and Igttt.giot :stryd:90eg the preparation of a detailed feasibility report for Project 693. : :::•:•:. I. Declaration of Surplus City Property. Project 673. AO Pine Ue. It was recommended to designate Parcel 10-03600-022-06 as surplus City property 0*quired iffier Project 673 and authorize a formal appraisal and subsequent disposal. • :: :-*• J. Special Huntina Permit. Jeff Steitz. It was recommenciaii to approve the special hunting permit as presented. K Approve Fee Schedule Changes. It was recommended to approve the following fee schedule changes: 1. Add a clause to vacation proceedirfigs.which are currently$300 stating '...plus out-of-pocket City costs on vacations requiring repladet101:10svnents and/or transfer of property if handled outside • the normal subdMsion process. • • -. 2. Dog license fees to $12/two years for all::tiogs. • 3. Final Assessment Report$.50 per paptii;Wfffre tto minimum. L Change Orders. Police Department/municipal Center Expansion. It was recommended to approve change orders for the Police Department project in the amount of $487 and for the Municipal Center remodeling in the amount of$4,912.65 as presented. (This action was reconsidered later in the meeting.) M. Tree Maintenance Contractors License,:ShorewpcqTrw Service. It was recommended to approve the tree maintenance contractor's license as pr.00i4d; . • • : ••• • :*::: N. Application for Exemption from Lawful GamblinqVcense. Qusks Unlimited. It was recommended to authorize an exemption from the lawful gambling licer*krequir0Ont for a raffle to be held at the Royal Cliff Banquet Center on September 12, 1995. • :•:.: 0. Final SubdMsion. Eagandale Center Industrial Park No. 12..4twas recommended to approve the final subdMsion as presented. P. Special Huntina Permit. Rebecca Joan Maurer. It was recommended to approve the special hunting permit as presented. 0. Special Hunting Permit. Richard Reed Maurer Jr. It was reiiiihmended to approve the special hunting permit as presented. R. Contract 94-01. Final Payment. Cedar drove Street FiQc9nstruction. ft was recommended to acknowledge completion for Contract 94-01 and authorize thE. 11th and final payment to McNamara Contracting in the amount of$8,744.40 and authorize perpetuifiOity maintenance subject to all appropriate warranty provisions. EAGAN CITY COUNCIL MINUTES;AUGUST 15, PAGE 3 ••••••• S. Contract 94-D. Eagandale Lemay Lake 4ffi'Addition Completioii.. It was recommended to acknowledge completion of Contract 94-D and authorizes lerpetual City maintenance subject to appropriate warranty conditions. T. Contract 94-J.Galaxie Hill Oaks Addition. it viigs'iaeiibtrtiiiierided to acknowledge completion of Contract 94-J and authorize perpetual City maintenance subject to appropriate warranty provisions. U. Award Contract for Irrigation System. Municipal Center. it was recommended to award the bid for the Municipal Center irrigation system to Professignal.Turf, in the amount of$43,150.13. V. Contract 93-16.Acknowledge Comoleticiii:..kikiti2i:Mii:Priiiiient. Lexington Diff ley Athletic Fields. It was recommended to acknowledge completion of CrWract 9346.end approve final payment W. Approve Convention and Visitors Bureau 199040aet, (f I :item was continued to September 19, 1995.) X. Coventry Pass 5th Addition Easement Vacations. it was recommended to receive the petition to vacate various street and utility easements located within the proposed Coventry Pass 5th Addition within Inver Grove Heights and schedule a public hearing to be held on September 5, 1995. Y. Vacate Sidewalk Easement. Park Center Addition. It was recommended to receive a petition to vacate a sidewalk easement over a portion of Duet A.Park Center Addition and schedule a public hearing on September 19, 1995. • Z Contract 95-12. Deerwood 4.0 MG Reser .oir. It was•'recommended to approve the plans and specifications for Contract 95-12 and authorize ti ie advertisemet.ftlor a competitive bid opening to be held at 10:30 a.m. on September 12, 1995. AA. Easement Vacation for Bell Lexington Ad[lititiii. It was recommended to receive the petition to vacate a portion of a sidewalk, trail and utility easement over Lot 1, Block 1, Bell Lexington Addition and schedule a public hearing for September 19, 1995. BB. Resination, Gun Club Lake Watershed Management Organization, it was recommended to accept the resignation of Bruce Hutchins as a citizen reprea ptative fpr the Gun Club Lake Watershed Management Organization and authorize staff to begin lb .•state: ad:acts rtisement process for a replacement Wachter moved, Masin seconded a motion ti#:approve:ttte consent agenda. Aye: 5 Nay: 0 fMINISS.ThA A i Special City Council Meeting. Hunter moved,Wachter seconded a motion to set a special workshop for August 29, 1995 at 5:30 p.m. Aye: 5 Nay: 0 Change Order #1. Contract 95-03. After an explanation by Assistant City Engineer Foertsch, Wachter moved, Hunter seconded a motion to approve Change•O.rder#1 to Contract 95-03. Aye: 5 Nay: 0 ' Traffic Signal #73876. After an explanation by Assistaitt'•City Engineer Foertsch, Awada moved, Wachter seconded a motion to approve trig :#7•167tx::Ai ye: 5 Nay: 0 • Administrator Hedges reviewed the situation with school liaison officers In District 197. He indicated he explained the funding arrangements for liaison officers for WO:other two school districts with District 197 officials, and wrote a letter to them to that effect EAGAN CITY COUNCIL MINUTES;AUGUST 15, 1995::':.' PAGE 4 •. Mayor Egan reviewed a letter receivd.from Northwest Airlines thanking city staff for their help with the recent fuel drop. VACATE CEDAR FREEWAY FRONTAGE ROAD Wachter moved,Masin seconded a motion to reschedule this public hearing for September 19,1995. Aye: 5 Nay: 0 VARIANCE, ROBERT BOEKHOFF, LAt 1,BLS 7, CEDAR GROVE#5 Senior Planner Ridley gave a staff report. Mayor Egan.then opened the public hearing to anyone wishing to speak. There being no one wishing ta.aResdc, Maypt-Egan turned the discussion back to the Council. Wachter moved,Awada seconded: :sxit ia•to saris:$3 foot variance to the side yard setback for 3949 Cinnabar Drive. Aye: 5 Nay: 0 • . s.s INTERIM JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT WITH INVER GROVE HEIGHTS Administrator Hedges explained tfta:hjstory of this request and its current status. Councilmember Hunter inquired as to whether there is a timelktit•ti#re.agreement. He Is concerned that if this drags out for ten years and park fees Increase,the city will get paid::at:03wer rate. City Attorney Sheldon responded that park fees are due upon the platting of the *perry, which is.• xpected to be in the near future. Other fees are due upon connection to the system. CO.Inciimerrttier:Itinter suggested that language be added to state that if the plat is not recorded within.two:yeArer:trdm y the execution of this agreement, that Inver Grove Heights will agree to remit the prevstiiit, •f ee••structure. Councilmember Awada suggested that the words or the prevailing rate'be added. Aikiiihistrator Hedges noted that the agreement can be amended, or he can do a letter of agreement that will serve as an addendum to the agreement. City Attorney Sheldon added that Inver Grove Heights can just initial any changes made to the agreement. Councilmember Wachter questioned whether Inver Grove Heights has a comprehensive guide plan. He noted that the City of Eagan will have t0-pvecsize#re:44180es•and storage tanks and he doesn't feel this is fair. He also feels the rates for Inver GriiVO:110.01t ski0010:be.bigher than those for Eagan residents. If there Is a drought, it will mean more restrictions for Eagan residents. Discussion followed concerning the language in the agreement. • Councilmember Hunter expressed a conceni.:t at the fee for Inver Grove Heights residents will be the same as Eagan residents. The agreement states that Inver Greve Heights will retain 10%of the user fees for their residents,so their rates are actually less. Mayor Egan noted that that Is for administrative fees,and there are no administrative fees associated with Eagan residents. City Attorney Sheldon clarified that the City of Eagan will bill Inver Grove Heights for the gross amount of water and Inver Grove Heights will bill each of the users. They are responsible for paying the City of Eagan whether or not they collect from their users. Councilmember Wachter stated 4.#eels that titet entire area should request annexation prior to approving this agreement. Eagan has notftItg'k gajfl:3ry.thfs: cement. Mayor Egan emphasized that we need to be good neighbors. There are many.jaitit''ptii eis•agOtiements In place to-help facilitate needs of adjoining communities. He doesn't feel it is for the City of Eagan to decide if Inver Grove Heights has planned properly for the future. He feels the City of Eagan ris to decide whether this is a reasonable request by an adjoining community. This agreement provides a's'surance that there isn't a foreseeable need for any oversizing beyond that which this system was currently designed for. It also provides the assurance EAGAN CITY COUNCIL MINUTES;AUGUST 15,1995:::'.':'':::::'::;:::: PAGE 5 . """• that the City of Eagan will not subsidize the seryices of another community. He feels this agreement is good public relations with an adjoining community;.t has been verr:t ssonable with the City of Eagan over the years. Councilmember Wachter stated he is not Of:iiiiSita to providing services to the 80 acres because It is contiguous to the City of Eagan. However, he doesn't agree with providing services to 800 acres. He feels the City of Eagan is developing Inver Grove Heights. If Inver Grove Heights wants to develop, they should furnish the services. Councilmember Masin concurred, noting that 800 acres is significant. Councilmember Hunter stated that this agreement:enSUrrek;tl*t.Eagan taxpayers are not subsidizing development of Inver Grove Heights. All Co$$ e I!3n e cf back to Inver Grove Heights. He is concerned about going any further than this 80 acres,::Mayor l:gatt:and Councilmember Awada concurred. Considerable discussion followed concerning furtherdevelopment'beyond this 80 acres. Awada moved, Hunter seconded a motion:ito••approveitii. agreement with the modification that prevailing fees shall apply. Aye: 4 Nay: I'• ?' titer t ppti$d) CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT, RONALD HAVE, LOTS 1 & 3, BLOCK 3, CEDAR INDUSTRIAL PARK Senior Planner Ridley gave a staff report. He noted that there is no erosion associated with existing runoff from the site. It was felt that if curb.04.gt4ter were installed, It would force water to specific areas that would probably cause erosion. Therefore;.:a was'felt•.that surfacing the area would be satisfactory and would not cause any erosion at that site. CouncIlrfrenibei.Nanter suggested that language be added to specifically state 'with no curb and gutter" since'lt:would ba detrimental to the site. Hunter moved, Masin seconded a motion to approve a conditional use permit toaitaw:outdoor storage of semi-trailers and tractors on portions of Lots 1 and 2, Block 3, Cedar Indulrttial:f?ark,subject to the following conditions. 1. The conditional use permit stiell.'be recorded at Dakota County within 60 days of Council approval with documentation provided to the City. 2. The applicant shall record a lot combination agreement at Dakota County for parcels PID #1016800-010-03 and PID #10-16800-022-03. 3. The applicant shall pave existkiirtiiii94:Aufficiptiliteas. on both lots with no curb and gutter. 4. The applicant shall submit a Landscap0::Plan for and approval and implement the landscaping within a year from Council approval ot: e CUP. 5. Outdoor storage shall be restricted to the storage#if:semi tractors and trailers. Aye: 5 Nay: 0 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AND VARIANCE, U.S. WEST NEWVECTOR Administrator Hedges noted that some questions haveliin raised by staff that have not yet been answered. Discussion followed concerning the type of tower 8tid whether It is needed. Councilmember Wachter stated he feels the tower will be na t3 ( ttt :I:3s in a good location,and the height is not objectionable. Councilmember Awada aiiiotirret3::::::i✓otiiide title discussion followed concerning the adequacy of coverage with the existing antennae, and whether.a.stand alone tower is needed. Counclimember Awada noted that there are only so madly water towers to put antennas on. With modem technology, a lot more towers like this will be needed. Times are changing and this tower won't be seen from a lot of areas because it isn't that tall. Mayor Egan expressed a concern about changing the EAGAN CITY COUNCIL MINUTES;AUGUST 15, 1995 PAGE 6 Council's past policy of only allowing antenrias.on water towers. Councilmember Hunter stated he feels It is a good policy; however, in this case, his:feels It makes:•iiiOie sense to allow a separate tower. Councilmember Awada added that a conditiol l::jjae.pen t•wft still be needed. Mayor Egan stated he is willing to support this because it is in an lndustr1ait 1 onji :area,:It is in a flood plain district, It is away from residents, and it is in an area of substantial shadoWS:'•'C6tUiicilmember Wachter suggested this could be approved subject to staff approval due to the technical questions that remain. More discussion followed. Wachter moved,Hunter seconded a motion to approve the conditional use permit to allow a cellular phone antennae on a portion of Lot 1, Block.3r;Cedar.iroustrial.Park, subject to the following conditions: •r.• 1. The conditional use permit shall•lie.'recprsd ti sit DO. Ota County within 60 days of Council approval with documentation provided to:the City. 2. The conditional use permit provides for 4440'tall n opoie with two groups of four antenna each and a 288 square foot eq .u s tit: ui di.1 ...: • 3. The 16'wide access easement and antenna and equipment building site shall be surfaced with bituminous or concrete. 4. No more than 25% of the equipment building exterior shall be metal. 5. The applicant shall provide dociriMentation from a structural engineer confirming the structural Integrity of the proposed mondparl&.•• Aye: 5 Nay: 0 Wachter moved, Awada seconded a mptiort to approve the variance to allow a cellular phone antennae tower that is higher than the distance:1r'ojpthe base of the tower to the nearest property line. Aye: 5 Nay: 0 PREUMINARY PLANNED DEVELOPMENT& PREUMINARY SUBDIVISION, EAGAN HEIGHTS ADDN. Senior Planner Ridley gave a staff report. Discussion followed concerning emergency access,the amount of parking provided, and whether tihe.twit streets within the development should be connected. • Hunter moved,Masin seconded a ihto approkie tits proposed preliminary planned development for Eagan Heights Townhomes for 200 townhome unksi a neigt borhood retail site, a bank/retail site; and a day care center. Aye: 5 Nay: 0 • Hunter moved,Wachter seconded a motion t6'approve l d minary subdivision for Eagan Heights Townhomes, subject to the following conditions: 1. The developer shall comply with standard conditions of plat approval Al, B1, B2, B4, Cl, C2, C4, D1, El, Fl, G1 and H1 as adopted by Council on February 3, 1993. 2. The developer be given credit for the on-site pondi1g:1dentified in the current site plan, and a • supplemental cash dedication be required as mitigattion for the shortfall in treatment provided by the proposed pond system:;;;::::::::.?:.::::'•:: :::::::::::::::::::•:::: 3. That filling or draining of the wetland on the alts be'prohibited. • 4. The developer install 9 category A trees or 18 category B trees or 36 category C trees as mitigation for significant tree removal in excess of allowable limits. This tree replacement will be in addition to any vegetation required in a landscape plan. EAGAN CITY COUNCIL MINUTES;AUGUST 15, PAGE 7 5. Tree protective measures(Le.4 kiOt polyethylene larighite safety netting) be installed at the drip line or at the perimeter of the*itical root zorai:•:#hichever is greater, of the significant trees/woodlands to be preserved:: ... .. 6. The City Forestry Division be notifieciys prior to the issuance of a grading permit to ensure compliance with the approved tree preservation plan. 7. The developer shall be responsible for preparing and recording with the subdivision appropriate documents establishing a homeowners' association. The documents must be submitted and approved by the City Attomey'SOffigSf$113Aatift31:$0p1Msion approval. Transfers of common area to the homeowners'assoCiiiiiittheg*iiicEirtfail with the subdMsion. .•:•::::. 8. The common area shall be shown as kits which 41 be deeded over to the homeowners' association at the time of final plat 9. The developer shall be responprovitifit:detalled plans and specifications covering the construction of the retaining wall in conformariCe with city standards. 10. The developer will be responsible for accommodating the three acres of surface water runoff from the cable TV site and Old Sibley Highway. 11. The developer will be responsibre:tor constructing a storm sewer system to drain an area of 5.5 acres from the intersection of Sit•SA:P:and.Old Sibley Highway. • • . 12. The outlet for the downstream pond stall be aigailicilimit the flow from the development to pre- development flow rates. : : 13. This development will be responsibietoi:ftrading the 900'section of Old Sibley Highway north of Diffley Road and the 650' spOilOirtOuthwest of the intersection of Street C and Old Sibley Highway. 14. This development shall be responsible for obtaining the necessary easements for the Ir sanitary sewer extension through the adjoining property north of this site. 15. This development shall be suEiliit4 i< a 001-#lii0:t1Sdication. ... ....• ..•.*:: 16. This development shall be subject to a cs•ti trails dAslication. 17. The existing trail along Diffley Road st4b0 extend across Outlots A and B. 18. The property must be platted. 19. Vacation of areas designated to be vacated by the City Council and the acquisition by applicant of the vacated areas. Aye: 5 Nay: 0 PREUMINARY PLANNED DEVELOPMENT:AppREWNART:.AUBDIVISION, SODERHOLM ADDITION Senior Planner Ridley gave a staff access issues involved with this request, noting that Dakota County required a right-In only along DifflOy. Road, as well as the dedication of 15 additional feet of right-of-way along Lexington and Diffley. Because of this,the developers are requesting 9 foot parking stalls instead of 10 foot stalls as originally proposed. They are also requesting a 10 foot variance to the setback for the parking and drive area off of Diffley for the proposed Holiday station. They EAGAN CITY COUNCIL MINUTES;AUGUST 15, 1995 PAGE 8 are also requesting a 5 foot variance to have;.the service drive gnd car wash on the property line on the north side of the building. They are also stifl.fi4questing a 20 fOt.setback variance for the neighborhood commercial retail property off of Diffley Road:•':06bS..rable:d CUssion followed concerning the variance requests, access, landscaping and upgrade of Deffey: i:i:.::;; '' Yvonne Krisnik,4195 South Lexington Way,expressed concerns over the Impact of this development on their property. There will be a considerable increase In traffic on a small residential street. She requested the city to urge Dakota County to allow a right-in/right-out along Diffley Road to reduce traffic on Lexington Way. Considerable discussto ..:i liowed..t nceming access and traffic flow within the development. Councilmember Wachter stated : fe.tt::ii•impetative to ask for the light-out on Diffley. Councilmember Awada Indicated a concern about safeI'wfifi ati:Agress onto Diffley Road. Mayor Egan noted that Lexington Way was not designed to take.* lot of:irnmercial traffic. Discussion followed concerning future development adjacent to Patrick Epp Park. Joe Krisnik, 4195 South Lexington ray;:kiti3Ca; c3:11e iiiould like a berm built similar to the one behind Fina He would also like to see some•'essurancers ;rom the developer that there won't be any garbage enclosures in the back of the building, that all of the air conditioning ceiling fixtures are fenced in, that all of the lights face away from him, and that no service drive will go behind the building. Senior Planner Ridley noted that because there is no drive access behind the retail building,the garbage enclosures will either have to be on the side of the building, or inside each of the individual bays. He also noted that the rooftop equipment will have to be screened and the lighting plan will be reviewed as part of the preliminary planned development agreement:• Discussion followed concerning pedestriant ffis .and:thepossibiiity of putting a sidewalk on the east side of Lexington Way. Mr. Krisnik indicated a cem that•with the additional traffic, he will have difficulty backing out of his driveway. Mr. Connelly indicatpid that 1f•.that:biiteomes a problem, they would be willing to work with him to build a turn-around. . . Rev. George Martin, Sts. Martha aeid::gl• ry Church, expressed support for the project. He did express a concern about the signs. He feels there are some inequities in the code relating to signs. After considerable more discussion,Mayor Egan suggested the city should make a good faith effort to get the access issue resolved with the county. Hunter moved, Wachter secondejj:a. btkut to:: appri :•the preliminary planned development for Soderholm Addition for a Holiday Station store;•MCDohiti!'Otestauiint,retail shop and medical clinic/urgent care facility, subject to the following conditions: 1. The planned development shall be for a 4,*squar of Holiday Station Store,a 3,200 square foot McDonald's, a 10,800 square foot retail'shoppiriOenter, and a 24,000 square foot urgent care/medical office building. 2. The term of the planned development shall be five years. 3. The 10,800 square foot retail shopping center shall..ptecede the development of the Holiday Station Store. • 4. Rental of trailers or similar vehits11. be: jtted. 5. The landscaping plan shall be revised to reflect.design elements, including a usable area and different species. • EAGAN CITY COUNCIL MINUTES;AUGUST 15, PAGE 9 • • 6. The following plans will be reqAd for final approvAiiii the PD: final plat,final site plan, final building elevations,final signagtfsns,-final lightin0:010n,final landscape plan, and pedestrian plan. ••••...._ ....• 7. The revised sign plan should Indicate iiiiitid006ithe off-premise business sign stating'Urgent Care Facility*. 8. No outdoor storage, sales or display is permitted. a The developer shall prepare firiiiifiii4iiiii;e1:000i0howing how all four buildings will be architecturally compatible in deird•rf.'•• • :•:.•:.: 10. Due to the lack of adequate parking for Jot 3, no niàji than 2,000 square feet of retail space shall be occupied by a restaurant, bakeiy4offee st4 or similar uses that have seating. 11. The developer shall meet the kitiireti 5046*:::Setbeck requirements, except for a 20 foot variance on the southwest corner and a 10 foot variance on the southeast corner. 12. The developer shall Install no more than two pylon signs meeting the code's distance requirements and all pylon signs must be of similar heights. Aye: 5 Nay:-0 ••*•::. • • . Hunter moved, Wachter seconded a rildii*OppTpvethe preliminary subdivision for Soderholm Addition, subject to the following conditions: • . 1. The developer shall comply with sta*lard: iliot;i•Of plat approval Al, Bl, B2, B3, B4, Cl, C2, C4, D1, El, Fl, G1 and H1.,:.ae-ackipted by Council on February 3, 1993. :•-: :•••*- 2. The developer shall be responsible for plugging and abandoning any septic systems and wells located on the site in accordance with city and county requirements. 3. The developer shall be required to construct manholes over the proposed sewer service line to provide the city with an inspe9tion.and .........g manhole for each sewer service. 4. The developer shall be respiiiiii64 iiir viiiiitiiii646Cess for the city booster station to the proposed internal street system of the d5yelopmentx-:: .•:':•-: • . 5. The developer shall resolve all access iss*regard101exington Avenue and Diffley Road prior to final plat approval. 6. The developer shall submit detailed erosion control plans In accordance with the city erosion/sediment control standards. 7. The developer shall extend storm sewer to IndWiduel.parking areas of the proposed buildings. - 8. The 7 smaller existing landscape trees be preserViii:iiia transplanting to a safe area on site or made available to city 9. The The proposed subdivision be • •••••' • 10. The development meet water quality mitigation re**ements with on-site ponding. EAGAN CITY COUNCIL MINUTES;AUGUST 15,1995: PAGE 10 11. The current design of the pond is.unacceptable anci,wfi need to be modified. The final pond design must be approved by th ;water resources.#xiOrdinator. 12. The development shall be subject tt•acasft#$8•idedication. 13. A right-out egress be granted directly onto Diffley Road east of Lexington Way by Dakota County. 14. A sidewalk be added on the ea :, s•.wf:1, ingt:T.Way south from the middle drive aisle to Diffley Road. 15. The applicant work with Mr. Krisnik to bti a turn-euiiind driveway. Aye: 5 Nay: 0 Mr. Connolly noted that they have:hO.:pi.i er wt eti:ttiey•go to the county to request the right-out egress and requested that the City Council provide a recommendation in writing for them to take to the county. Wachter moved, Hunter seconded a motion to write a letter of support for the applicant, recommending that a right-out egress be granted by Dakota County. Aye: 5 Nay: 0 DAKOTA COUNTY 5-YEAR CAPITAL...IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Administrator Hedges gave a staff report.:pn suggested changes to the plan. Discussion followed concerning the Lexington Avenue/Wescott Road:project..•i QuncIIfnembers indicated they are comfortable with the staff recommendation. • Hunter moved, Wachter secondedf a motion to modify the proposed 1996-200 5 year Capital improvement Program for Dakota County as follows: 1. Reschedule the Yankee Doodle Road from T.H. 149 to County Road 63 roadway improvement from 1995 to 1997. 2. Reschedule Cliff Road from Che;;401t#fvQ.t :ae?drton Avenue roadway improvement from 1995 to 1996. . .... . 3. Reschedule Yankee Doodle Road from Otot Knots: cad through Denmark Avenue roadway improvement from 1997 to 1996. • 4. Add Lexington Avenue from Yankee Doodle Road to Clubview Drive roadway improvement to 1997 projects. 5. Reschedule Lone Oak Road from T.H.55 to County Road 63 roadway improvement from 1997 to the future. ' 6. Reschedule Cliff Road from Lexington Avenue to T.i:1:'3 roadway improvement from 1998 to the future. 7. Reschedule Lexington Avenue at Wescott Road signal and intersection Improvements from the • future to 1996. 8. Add Lexington Avenue at Duckwood Drive signal to 1996. • EAGAN CiTY COUNCIL MINUTES:AUGUST 15,199$ PAGE 11 9. Reschedule Cliff Road from Lex rgton Avenue to T,H. 3 trailway from 1998 to 1996. Aye: 5 Nay: 0 Administrator Hedges informed the Council about the Dakota County League of Governments meeting on August 16 at 7:00 p.m., noting that the subject is violence prevention. Assistant City Engineer Foertsch asked whether Coundifinembers would like to have area traffic counts in future staff reports. After some discussions lt:�was decided it isn't necessary unless it is an issue relative to the decision. City Attorney Sheldon noted therei•44.be an exectffiva session following the Council meeting. Administrator Hedges added that the work session will continue after the Council meeting as well. Councilmember Wachter noted he is opposed to the change order for the Municipal Center relative to adding steel beams to support the new lunchroom floor. He feels the architect should have caught that and he doesn't support paying for it. Hunter moved, Awada seconded a motion to reconsider change orders for the Police Department/Municipal:Tenter expansion. Aye: 5 Nay: 0 Wachter moved, Awada seconded a motion to approve all change anJss:*fth•the exception of DAKA, Inc., Change Order#2/pco #19 in the amount of$3,161. Aye: 5 Nay: 0 •• .. . Councilmember Wachter expressed a tiilIncem.abcxitthi9 number of signs at some of the gas stations In Eagan. He feels this Is in violation of: •>OrviiTce and should be enforced. Councilmember Masin reminded CQtlnalmembers about the global access seminar on August 16th, noting that there are still openings. CKGS' R • Wachter moved, Egan seconded a.tnotion 1a.8pprove the check register dated August 11, 1995 in the amount of$1,506,018.55. Aye: 5 Nay:.:i3 • wouriumart The meeting adjourned at 9:27 p.m. to cont4 the wd c.:session and hold an executive session. DLP Date City Clerk If you need these minutes In an alternative form such as large prin4 braille,audio tape, etc.,please contact the City of Eagan, 3830 Pilot Knob Road,Ei0.0,416f:5512$:( T2).681-4600, (TDD phone: (612)454-8535). The City of Eagan Is committed to the policy that all persons ham equal access to Its programs, services, activities,facilities and employment without regard to race,coloi :creed,religion,national origin,sex,sexual orientation, disability, age, marital status or status with regard public assistance. MINUTES O0:A:SP€Ctikl' id63li1 G OF THE EA.G&N CITY COUNCIL:::: Egan, Minnesota .4:014 • A special meeting of the Eagan City Council was held on Tuesday, August 15, 1995 at 5:00 p.m. at Black Hawk Middle School. Present were Mayor Egan and Councilmembers Wachter, Awada, Masin and Hunter. Also present were City Administrator Tom Hedges,Senior Planner Kristi Mamin, Parks and Recreation Director Ken Vraa, and Police Chief Pat Geagan. REVISED CENTWA 'MEA/OPU$SITE PLAN Senior Planner Mamin reviewed the changes propgsed by Opus for the Central Area Plan,which included residential uses on Outlot B,and the removal of the community centIK:Bhe noted that without the community center and park component, It is now an entirely private•: :.Disc us ion followed on the removal of trees in the residential areas. Councilmember Wachter sugddttie adc304:istdential building be shifted to save the large tree In that area, or remove the building if they can't save the tree. Councilmember Awada stated she doesn't feel there should be residential development on Outlot B. Discussion followed on the plaza area. Councilmember Wachter stated he doesn't feel the road should be narrowed as is shown on the plan. Mayor Egan stated he is disappointed with the plan. He wanted to see a trail to get into the open space rather than Just along:•the•roadways. He indicated he would like to visit Apple Valley's downtown and talk to city officials about what th0J>:ue esses and failures were and if their expectations were met. The consensus of the Council was that residential'is trot:appropriate for Oudot B. It was felt it would be better as commercial property. Mayor Egan suggested a hotel, .It was also consensus that Promenade should not be narrowed, and tree loss should be minimal. • • . - The concept of a monument was disc •'Counciimember Hunter indicated he would still like to see a monument, but not as extravagant as Apple Valley's. Mayor Egan asked about the possibility of a special service district for this area, and Senior Planner Mamin indicated she can check into it. Discussion followed on what needs to be done to the Planned Development, and what needs to be done with the Olson property. CMC ARENA OPENING Parks and Recreation Director Vraa f'epbrted>tri ftte::sttis•:bf the civic arena and reviewed the opening ceremonies, as well as the advertising and Ice time they have been..able to sell. Councilmember Masin suggested that some free skating lessons be given when it openes:to:het son#*•:people out skating that don't normally skate, and to let people know that it is more than Just a hockek:arena. PAti'cs and Recreation Director Vraa indicated he can check into that. OTHER BUSINESS Police Chief Geagan reported on personnel issues within the department. He also reported about a woman who has been complaining about how the Police Department has handled some of her complaints. She requested a meeting with Councilmember Awada,the Mayor and himself anth*)ted that she has threatened to sue the Police Department. Councilmember Awada agreed to meet with her. At 6:30 p.m.the meeting adjourned to #$ eai atf? Qtu .1t1ppipting. At 9:35 p.m.,the work session resumed. PROGRESS ON OPERATING::BUDGET Administrator Hedges reviewed the status of the budget and discussed the amounts for HACA for the coming year. After considerable discussion concerning the tax capacity and how the reduced amount of aid will affect the EAGAN SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MINUTES;AUGUST 15, PAGE 2 city, it was the consensus of the Council to make-Whe lowered phigiitit of HACA with existing services and keep the tax capacity at the same rate. ADMINISTRATOR'S UPDATE Administrator Hedges reviewed the recent meeting between Community Development staff,the City Attorney, and the Small Business Association. He stated he feels the meeting went very well and reviewed some of the issues that came up at that meeting. He stated he fe*Itilit.•:$14!ff:-Frpegs.:to:work on communications, and that the city needs to reach out to the community to update iriti•fnfoirtit.ftfari:kiii:Opyelopment issues. He outlined some of the meetings the city Is planning for this fall. '• At 10:08 p.m., the Council adjourned to an exeq414 .... ;••• DLP -:••••••••• %::. ••. Date City Clerk • • • : •• - -• • •:. . •:••: ••••• • • . .•..• . . ' .. . • •...•::•:: •.: ::.• •... . •:•.•:: •. • •• •••••••• :•-:•••.: • • Agenda Information Memo September 5, 1995 Eagan City Council Meeting There are twenty-six (26) items on the agenda referred to as consent items requiring one (1) motion by the City Council. If the City Council wishes to discuss any of the items in further detail, those items should be removed from the Consent Agenda and placed under Additional Items unless the discussion required is brief. PERSONNEL ITEMS A. Personnel Items Item 1. Skating School Director-- ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: To ratify the appointment of Renee Sorenson as Skating School Director.. FACTS: In official action at the August 15, 1995 City Council meeting, the Council approved the hiring of a person to be named as Skating School Director. Since then, it is the recommendation of Civic Arena Manager Burkart that Renee Sorenson be appointed to that position. Item 2. Design Engineer-- ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: To approve the hiring of a person to be named as Design Engineer. FACTS: Interviews for the position of Design Engineer were held on Wednesday, August 30, 1995. The interview panel consisted of Director of Public Works Colbert, Assistant City Engineer Foertsch and Assistant to the City Administrator Duffy. References are currently being checked for the leading candidate. It is expected that a name will be furnished at the City Council meeting on Tuesday. Agenda Information Memo September 5, 1995 Eagan City Council Meeting Item 3. Community Service Officer-- ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: To approve the hiring of Neil Anderson, Sam Schooler and Susan Hitchens as Community Service Officers. FACTS: The Police Department has just gone through a fairly lengthy hiring process for the position of Community Service Officer. It is their recommendation that Neil Anderson and Sam Schooler be hired as Community Service Officers for the City. In addition, we anticipate an additional opening for Community Service Officer in the month of October, or even possibly earlier. Therefore, it is also the recommendation of the Police Department that Susan Hitchens be hired for that opening. Item 4. Seasonal Part-Time Arena Supervisor/Resurfacer-- ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: To approve the hiring of Chad Holton as a seasonal part-time Arena Supervisor/Resurfacer. FACTS: It will be necessary to hire a number of"seasonal part-time Arena Supervisors/Ice Resurfacers" for the new civic arena. These positions basically serve as operators of the ice resurfacing machine. They also supervise the arena when neither the Civic Arena Manager or Assistant Civic Arena Manager is present. The first person recommended for hire for one of these positions is Chad Holton. Item 5. Reclassification/Supervisor of Forestry ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: To approve the reclassification of the Supervisor of Forestry position from Range H,non-exempt employee, to Range I, exempt employee. 3 Agenda Information Memo September 5, 1995 Eagan City Council Meeting FACTS: In the two years since a person was hired to fill the newly created position of Supervisor of Forestry, the duties of that position have changed significantly. The duties of the position have changed from those of a "working foreman" to a majority of administrative tasks. This has happened as a result of new policies and procedures which have been implemented by the City of Eagan and the State of Minnesota. These include, but are not limited to, the City of Eagan's tree preservation policy, inclusion of the forester in the review of development applications, administration of various grant programs and the State of Minnesota reimbursement program. Because of the significant change in the position's duties, the Director of Parks and Recreation and Superintendent of Parks requested that the TSP and job description be revised. As a result of that revision, it was determined that the position should move from Range H to Range I. In addition, it is recommended that the position be reclassified from non-exempt to exempt under the requirements of the Fair Labor Standards Act. This means that the position will no longer receive overtime payment for hours worked over 40 in a work week. Item 6. Revision to City's Personnel Policy-- ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: To revise Section 2.2.8 to include son or daughter-in-law of the employee and spouse in the definition of"immediate family." FACTS: • The definition of"immediate family" in the City's personnel policy currently consists of spouse, children, parents, spouse's parents and children, brothers and sisters, brothers and sisters-in-law, grandchildren and grandparents of both the employee and spouse. When this item was discussed at a Department Head meeting,it seemed appropriate to add to this definition sons and daughters- in-law of both the employee and spouse because, if a son or daughter-in-law of an employee or the employee's spouse were to become seriously ill or die, it seemed as much or more appropriate to allow the employee to use sick or funeral leave than for even some of the other family members listed. ATTACHMENTS: Attached on page __cis a copy of the personnel policy as amended. Additional language is underlined. SECTION TWO DEFINITIONS 2.2.8 "Immediate Family" shall consist of spouse,children,parents,spouse's parents and children, brothers and sisters, brothers and sisters-in-law, grandchildren, sons and daughters-in-law and grandparents of both the employee and spouse. 5 Agenda Information Memo September 5, 1995 Eagan City Council Meeting B. PLUMBERS LICENSES ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: To approve the plumbers licenses for Bredahl Plumbing Inc., Central Plumbing, Lafond Plumbing Inc., 01-Berg Construction, Plumrite Inc., and Randy L Monson, as presented. FACTS: These applications are in order for consideration by the Council at this time. &=:, Agenda Information Memo September 5, 1995 Eagan City Council Meeting C. SPECIAL HUNTING PERMITS ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: To approve special hunting permits for Shawn Hunter,Norman E. Svien, Gregory J.Arens, Brian Collins and Stephen Louis Huettl, for locations as listed on their respective application forms. FACTS: ■ Each of the applicants has received the owner's permission to hunt on the property ' indicated on their application. • The Police Department has reviewed the applications and has found no reason to deny any of these permits. ATTAC'HMEN'TS: • Applications are enclosed without page number. • /7 Agenda Information Memo September 5, 1995 Eagan City Council Meeting D. RESOLUTION CHANGING COUNCIL MEETING DATE ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: Approve resolution changing date of City Council meeting from September 19 to September 20, 1995. FACTS: Due to a scheduling conflict at Blackhawk Middle School, it was necessary to change the date of the meeting. All public hearings scheduled for September 19 will be held on September 20, and all notices have been sent with the September 20 date. ATTACHMENTS: Resolution, page 9 . 4i# Z00d l[YIt: I1 S6-10-60 OBLC ZC, Zt9 9496-2I RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF EAGAN CHANGING COUNCIL MEETING DATE WHEREAS,the City of Eagan has been holding its Council meetings at Blackhawk Middle School during the reconstruction of.City Hall; and WHEREAS, the City of Eagan has been informed that the Blackhawk Middle School is not available for the September 19, 1995, City Council meeting;and WHEREAS,the City Council has decided to change the date of the Council meeting to September 20, 1995,to be held at the Blackhawk Middle School located at 1540 Deerwood Drive in said City; and WHEREAS, all public notices have been notified for the September 20, 1995, City Council meeting. NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved,the City Council of the City of Eagan. Dakota County, Minnesota, hereby changes the September 19, 1995, Council meeting to Supte nber 20, 1995, to be held at the Blackhawk Middle School. Dated: • 1995. CITY OF EAGAN By: Thomas A. Egan Its: Mayor ATTEST: By: Eugene VanOverbeke Its: City Clerk Z /Z #:Z191, 199 g19 413142 X001114 NOS 8S: NVLE:TT! 26-1 -6 :A8 INKS Agenda Information Memo September 5, 1995 Eagan City Council Meeting E. APPOINTMENT, GUN CLUB WATERSHED MANAGEMENT ORGANIZATION ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: Appoint Scott Merkley as a citizen representative on the Gun Club Watershed Management Organization, for a term to commence immediately, and expire June 1, 1998. FACTS: ■ This opening was advertised in This Week Newspapers. Scott Merkley was the only person expressing an interest in this position. ATTACHMENTS: Background Information Form, pages I / thru la)— . ( 0 AUG-30795 WED 11;44 P.01 1 C'I'TY OF PAGAN BACaGROVND INFORMATION FORM *Please type or pmt clearly In bah Name Date ' Ise order that the Maur and Coandlurniabers hare • better uadehtnndleg of your db +atmd and lnter+tste,plea pmvtJ the Mowing Wormedurt (Attach were auto laity). • Rome Adores ECCA LiI phone az IfSZ-34 o - t . Now Long have you lived in Ragan? 12- years Supioyrr Co. €P Oaanptdioaa .E It ia w(tin l-a I A!}>rr,a P (W), E t 1 : Please Indicate which Commiittees/Cann dsoioas you are appyhg tor. List only those you mould he corks*b torarta fi, •orwfine an- Cholen. bid Moles 8r4 4th tea .,. I Prior opulence on City Consmlplora,Oly Boards,etc, t / 2 ‘,- S •t I • Potst•it"Fax Nate T671 � p;y;,► TO PE poisusi ti nom 5Cra7r meNCLCY Co.nept. CO. Phone a Phone Fct 4 fax i &-95% J 08-30-95 11 :46AM P001 #33 AUG_30.95 WED 11:45 P. 02 ••--- ---� •... Y. Y..Y/111 to 21auoIui rUU4/UU4 Provide a d ort paragraph mmmariaing lc are swift as appointment to a Commission to the City draw. $r14' describe your background, env:dome and any other inhumation not pmioa*ty gives which yon Wove ioald be considered regarding the appointment Inn are seeking. 40 Ye6 - 11.1 p. . 4 Y0 5 • • /UM kn City Administrator Date 9830 �,Rood 4 Office Use try 91 woe II Ina .p1,. • Te1epbas (612) 6634600 &-95% 08-30-95 11 :46AM P002 #33 Agenda Information Memo September 5, 1995 Eagan City Council Meeting F. CHANGE ORDERS POLICE DEPARTMENT/MUNICIPAL CENTER EXPANSION ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: To approve change orders for the Police Department/Municipal Center expansion as presented. FACTS: The final paperwork on change orders for the Police Department is being completed and a number of items are in process for the City Hall remodeling. • Of the City Hall items, Change Order #5 for Spraungel Construction relates to a general conditions requirement to remove materials. This was included as part of the general conditions budget for the project. Because we used an on-site contractor to perform the work, it is processed as a change order to their contract,but will be charged against the general conditions budget. ATTACHMENTS: Staff memorandums on pages through ( � . 1 , r.*lx;:.": MEMO city of eagan TO: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES FROM: ASSISTANT TO THE CITY ADMINISTRATOR HOHENSTEIN DATE: AUGUST 31, 1995 SUBJECT: POLICE DEPARTMENT CHANGE ORDERS The City is in receipt of the three change orders for the Police Department in the net amount of $293.40. The changes are described below: 1. Mid-Co Security - Change Order #4/pco #108 - Furnish television mount for Dispatch Center monitor (Eagan staff installed) - $188.40. 2. Glewwe Doors - Change Order #3/pco #56 - Modify door frames to accomodate revised door widths in conference rooms - $105.00. These items have been reviewed in detail by the staff and consultants and are in order for consideration by the City Council at this time. If any Council member wishes to review the change in more detail, please let me know. I MEMO —city of eagan TO: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES FROM: ASSISTANT TO THE CITY ADMINISTRATOR HOHENSTEIN DATE: AUGUST 30, 1995 SUBJECT: MUNICIPAL CENTER EXPANSION CHANGE ORDER The City is in receipt of four change orders for the municipal center remodeling in the net amount of $5,686.00. The changes are described below: 1. Haldeman-Homme - Change Order #2/pco #27 - Add pull-out, under-counter, computer shelf for building permit system to allow permits to be printed at the front desk - $165.00. 2. McGuire Mechanical - Change Order #4/pco #23 - Delete plumbing rough-ins for potential future sink in lunch room and cut out pans for floor drains in three locations - ($531.00). 3. Ceilings, Inc. - Change Order #2/pco #41 - Reduce ceiling area in basement hallway - ($100.00). 4. Spraungel Construction - Change Order #5/pco #36 - Haul out and dispose of excess material from site and building excavation (to be charged to general conditions) - $6,152.00. This item has been reviewed in detail by the staff and consultants and is in order for consideration by the City Council at this time. If any Council member wishes to review the change in more detail, please let me know. /5 Agenda Information Memo September 5, 1995 Eagan City Council Meeting G. AUTHORIZE BURNSVILLE/EAGAN CABLE COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION STANDSTILL AGREEMENT CABLE FRANCHISE RENEWAL PROCESS ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: To authorize the Burnsville/Eagan Cable Communications Commission to enter into a standstill agreement with Meredith Cable for the cable franchise renewal process. FACTS: The Cable Commission and the cities were formally noticed of the cable company's intention to begin the franchise renewal process under the controlling statutes. The law provides for a specific six month review process or an informal process which provides for the same public input and activity but permits the review and negotiations to occur over the remainder of the existing franchise period. • Other communities, legal counsel and the company have all indicated that the informal process is preferable. In order to implement that process, a "standstill agreement" is necessary. ATTACHMENTS: • Staff memorandum and draft agreement on pages / 7 through p20 1P MEMO DATE: August 24, 1995 TO: Assistant to the City Administrator Hohenstein Deputy City Manager Hansen FROM: Mike Reardon, Cable Coordinator SUBJECT: Request for Member Cities to Authorize Cable Commission as Member Cities' Franchise Renewal Representative BACKGROUND As you are aware, the Member Cities have entered the three year cable franchise renewal period. On July 13, Meredith Cable submitted to the Cable Commission a letter which "formally" commenced the franchise renewal proceedings in accordance with federal law. At the Commission's July 27 meeting, Legal Counsel Creighton reviewed for the Commission the franchise renewal process, including two franchise renewal options of either formal or informal. (Previously provided to the Cities was Creighton's memorandum which summarized the franchise renewal process/options). The informal process allows for full negotiations over a three year period opposed to six months, and includes public input, information gathering, and current/future operations assessment and needs. Legal Counsel Creighton recommended that the Commission/Cities follow the informal process. I concur with the informal option, based on numerous recommendations from other municipal attorneys agreement with Counsel Creighton that the informal process is preferred. Meredith Cable has also indicated it prefers the "informal" procedure. With Meredith Cable's July 13 submittal, the formal six month process has been started and in order to suspend the formal procedure, a "Standstill Agreement" must be executed by Meredith and either the Member Cities or Commission. The Commission requested Legal Counsel to prepare the agreement for execution at its August 24 meeting. DISCUSSION As the Commission is an advisory body, without the power to enter into formal negotiations or execute contracts without prior authority granted from the Member Cities, the Member Cities must first grant authority to the Commission to represent the Cities during the renewal period. This would be identical to the same procedure the Cities authorized during the two cable ownership transfers, wherein the Commission conducted 17 the public meetings, gathered information and negotiated on behalf of the Member Cities, but final official action still enacted by the City Councils. As the Commission has previously represented the Member Cities on both cable ownership transfers, and currently acts as the rate regulatory authority for the Member Cities, staff would recommend that the Member Cities authorize the Commission to represent the Member Cities in the same manner as it has with the transfers of ownership. Upon the granting of such authority, the Commission would execute the Standstill Agreement, thus "hold in abeyance" the formal process while the Commission/Member Cities and cable company negotiate a new franchise. This process will probably take at least two years. Staff also recommends that a joint meeting of the City Councils and the Commission be conducted sometime during the fall so that the Councils become familiar with the franchise renewal process, discuss issues important to the Councils, and address any concerns that they might have. REQUEST FOR ACTION In order to facilitate both the commencement of the franchise renewal process, and the execution of the Standstill Agreement, staff requests that the Member Cities authorize the Commission to act on behalf of the Member Cities as its franchise renewal representative. In accordance with such authority, the Commission would be granted the power to execute the necessary documents with both Meredith Cable and necessary consultants in order to conduct the franchise renewal process, with final approval authority reserved for the Member Cities. 4 STANDSTILL AGREEMENT TO PURSUE INFORMAL FRANCHISE RENEWAL PROCEDURES THIS AGREEMENT is made as of the day of , 1995, by and between the Burnsville-Eagan Cable Communications Commission("Commission")and Meredith Cable Company ("Meredith"); WHEREAS, the Commission is a Joint Powers Commission organized pursuant to Minnesota Statute § 471.59, as amended, and includes the following municipalities: Burnsville and Eagan (hereinafter "Member Cities"). WHEREAS, Meredith and the Member Cities have executed Cable Franchise Ordinances (hereinafter "Franchises"); • WHEREAS, Meredith has requested commencement of renewal proceedings for the Franchises by letter dated WHEREAS, the Burnsville-Eagan Joint Powers Agreement includes the power to administer the Franchise on behalf of the Member Cities, including review and recommendations regarding renewal thereof; WHEREAS, Commission and Meredith agree that informal renewal procedures are mutually beneficial and preferable to the formal renewal procedures and timelines for renewal review set out in Section 626 of the Cable Communications Policy Act of 1984, as amended by the Cable Consumer Protection and Competition Act of 1992 ("Cable Act"); NOW THEREFORE, IN CONSIDERATION of the mutual covenants, terms, conditions and representations contained herein, the parties agree as follows: THAT the parties will hold in abeyance the formal procedures for renewal as set out in Section 626 of the Cable Act and the parties will proceed informally with renewal negotiations; FURTHER, that the formal Section 626 procedural timelines are hereby tolled; FURTHER, that either party may recommence the formal Section 626 procedures upon written notification to the other party; FURTHER, that upon receipt of written notice by either party regarding recommencement of formal procedures, if any, the procedural timelines of Section 626 shall recommence; ,( FURTHER, that nothing agreed to herein shall extend the term of the Franchise beyond its natural expiration; provided, however, that should either party recommence the formal procedures at such a time when the procedural timelines of the formal process shall extend beyond the term of the Franchise, the Franchise shall be extended to account for the formal procedure timelines. FURTHER, that except as expressly stated herein, neither party waives any rights nor shall be prejudiced in any way herein. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have entered into this Agreement as of this day of , 1995. Meredith Cable Company Burnsville-Eagan Cable Communications Commission By: By: Its: Its: cAi1 cia-aksrAi. sn.001kt18/10/95 10:45A I 2 a0 Agenda Information Memo September 5, 1995 H. PROJECT 692. SIBLEY HWY. STS & SANITARY SEWER ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: To receive the feasibility report for Project 692 (Sibley Highway- Streets& Sanitary Sewer) and schedule a public hearing to be held on October 3, 1995. FACTS: • In response to a petition submitted by the developer of the Eagan Heights Addition (Town& Country Developers), the City Council authorized the preparation of a feasibility report for the upgrading of Old Sibley Highway from Di81ey Road to the north past the Meredith Cable Studios and also the extension of sanitary sewer service to this proposed future development. • This feasibility report has been completed and is now being presented to the City Council under separate cover for their review and consideration of scheduling a public hearing to formally present and discuss the merits of this proposed public improvement. ISSUES: • While this project was initiated by a petition from the developer, the proposed improvements will result in special assessments to adjacent properties. / Agenda Information Memo September 5, 1995 L PROJECT 567R, EFFRESS ADDITION STORM SEWER ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: To approve a Stipulation of Settlement for easement acquisition(Project 567R,Effress Addition- Storm Sewer) and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute all related documents. FACTS: • The City has reached a negotiated settlement with the property owners of Lot 2,Block 2,Effress Addition for the acquisition of a utility easement. The City Attorney's Office and Director of Public Works have reviewed this settlement offer and found it to be economically reasonable and in the best interests of the City. ATTACHMENTS: (6) • Assistant City Attorney background memo, page d 6 . • Resolution adopting Stipulation of Settlement, paiTIT2—y-- • Stipulation agreement, pages.)S-1 . Pee FL'C4/`- 1,Au92 9 19g TO: Tom Colbert, Director of Public Works FROM: Annette M. Margarit, Assistant City Attorney DATE: August 28, 1995 RE: City of Eagan v. Lawrence W. Wenzel Court File No. C2-95-6248 Project No. 567R In January of 1990, the City Council adopted Project No. 567R ordering storm sewer improvements in Effress Addition located at the northeast corner of Pilot Knob Road and Yankee Doodle Road. The storm sewer improvements were necessary to accommodate Cereal Chemist's expansion and the anticipated development of the nearby property owned by MnDOT. The 21- inch and 18-inch storm sewer system then currently in place in Maurice Drive carried water to Pond CP-5. Project 567R involved construction of a parallel storm sewer to provide additional drainage capacity to the area with a 36-inch pipe emptying into Pond CP-5. An easement across Lot 2, Block 2,Effress Addition was required for placement of the new pipe. That property is owned by Lawrence Wenzel and his wife Doneene Wenzel and is part of the Glen Pond Estates apartment complex. The Wenzels granted the City right-of-entry in May of 1991. During the past several years, the City has attempted to negotiate resolution of acquisition of the easement with the Wenzels through such things as ponding or density credits. The negotiations were unsuccessful and the City commenced condemnation proceedings in February of 1995. The City hired an appraiser to assess the damages for the 1,500 square feet permanent easement required and the 4,500 square feet temporary construction easement. The appraiser determined the damage to the parcel was $1,950.00. The City also owes the Wenzels interest on the $1,950.00 and $500.00 per statute for appraiser costs, totaling approximately$2,800.00. The Commissioner's Hearing for this matter was set for August 22, 1995, but the parties arrived at a proposed resolution whereby the City would pay the property owners a total of$4,000.00. The $4,000.00 represents approximately$3,000.00 in damages, $500.00 statutory interest on those damages since the May 1991 right-of-entry and $500.00 for the landowners'appraisal fee. In light of the cost of the Commissioners Hearing which would include attorney fees, fees for the appraiser's testimony and the Commissioners'fees, I recommend the Council adopt the proposed resolution of$4,000.00. I request this matter be set on the consent agenda for the City Council at its September 5, 1995, meeting for approval of the$4,000.00 settlement for the condemnation and acquisition of the drainage and utility easement across Lot 2, Block 2, Effress Addition. A proposed Resolution is attached. AMM/wkt ca.5 • • RESOLUTION OF THE.CITY OF EAGAN '• ADOPTING STIPULATION OF SETTLEMENT • WHEREAS, on February2, 1995,the City.ofEagan commenced condemnation proceedings against property located within the City of Eagan and legally described as Lot 2, Block 2,Effress Addition ("Subject Property")for the purposes of acquiring a permanent drainage and utility easement and a temporary construction easement as part of Public Improvement Project No. 5678; and WHEREAS, the Subject Property is owned by Lawrence W. Wenzel and Doneene R. Wenzel; and WHEREAS, the condemnation Commissioner's Hearing in this matter was set for August 22, 1995; and WHEREAS, the parties in this case have settled the question of damages to the Subject Property arising from the City's acquisition of the easement as described in the condemnation Petition according to the terms described in the attached Stipulation. NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved, the Eagan City Council hereby adopts the attached Stipulation resolving this condemnation dispute and authorizes the Mayor and City Clerk to execute the Stipulation on the City's behalf. Dated: , 1995. CITY OF EAGAN By: Thomas A. Egan Its: Mayor ATTEST: By: Eugene VanOverbeke Its: City Clerk at-/ Case Type 2. Condemnation STATE OF MINNESOTA DISTRICT COURT COUNTY OF DAKOTA FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT Court File No.: C2-95-6248 City of Eagan, a Minnesota municipal corporation, Petitioner, v. STIPULATION AND ORDER Lawrence W. Wenzel and Doneene R. Wenzel, husband and wife; and Federal National Mortgage Association, a United States corporation, Respondents. WHEREAS, on January 16, 1990, the City Council for Eagan adopted Project No. 567R concerning storm sewer improvements in Effress Addition located in the City of Eagan, County of Dakota, State of Minnesota; and WHEREAS, Project No. 567R required the City of Eagan(the "City") obtain a drainage and utility easement across Lot 2, Block 2, Effress Addition, which property is owned by Respondents Lawrence W. Wenzel and Doneene R. Wenzel; and WHEREAS, on May 10, 1991, Respondents Lawrence W. Wenzel and Doneene R. Wenzel, signed a Right-of-Entry and Waiver of Trespass granting the City the right to enter onto Respondents'property for purposes of constructing the Project; and WHEREAS, on February 2, 1995, the City commenced a condemnation action for the drainage and utility easement by filing a condemnation Petition with Dakota County District Court and having Commissioners named; and WHEREAS, on June 2, 1995, the City sent Respondents Wenzel a check in the • sum of$2,310.27 representing the approved appraisal amount of$1,950.00 and statutory interest from June of 1991 through June 15, 1995; and • C2 WHEREAS, a Commissioners Hearing to determine the amount of damages to Respondents'property caused by the City's acquisition of the easement has been set for August 22, 1995; and WHEREAS, the parties in this matter wish to resolve the issue of damages incurred by Respondents from the City's taking of a permanent drainage easement and a temporary construction easement, as described in the Petition in this proceeding. NOW, THEREFORE, it is stipulated by the parties as follows: 1. As compensation for all damages occurring to Respondents'property as a result of the City's acquiring a drainage and utility easement for project No. 567R, as that easement is described in the Petition in this proceeding, the City shall pay Respondents a total sum of$4,000.00, which includes the damages, statutory interest on the damages and the $500.00 statutory appraisal fee. The $2,310.27 already paid by the City of Eagan shall be deducted from the $4,000.00 sum. 2. Upon payment of the remaining portion of the $4,000.00 owed to Respondents, Petitioner shall be entitled to file its Final Certificate for the easement as described in Exhibit A attached hereto. 3. The check for the remaining sum shall be made payable to Lawrence W. Wenzel, Doneene R. Wenzel and Federal National Mortgage Association.. 4. This document may be executed in multiple originals. Dated: , 1995. CITY OF EAGAN, a Minnesota municipal corporation By: Thomas A. Egan Its: Mayor By: Eugene VanOverbeke Its: City Clerk aY Dated: , 1995. SEVERSON, WILCOX& SHELDON, P.A. By: Annette M. Margarit, #184445 Attorney for City of Eagan 600 Midway National Bank Building 7300 West 147th Street Apple Valley, MN 55124 (612)432-3136 Dated: , 1995. Lawrence W. Wenzel Dated: , 1995. Doneene R. Wenzel Dated: , 1995 CAMPBELL, KNUTSON, SCOTT& FUCHS By: Gary G. Fuchs Attorney for Respondents Wenzel Eagandale Office Center 1380 Corporate Center Curve Eagan MN 55121 (612)452-5000 Dated: , 1995 FNMA MORTGAGE By: Its: 0 7 . ORDER The above Stipulation is hereby adopted as the Order of this Court. Dated: , 1995. BY THE COURT: Judge of District Court C9 EXHIBIT NA" A 20.00 foot wide permanent easement for drainage and utility purposes and a 60.00 foot wide temporary easement for construction purposes over, under and across Lot 2, Block 2, Effress Addition, Dakota County, according to the recorded plat thereof, the centerline of which is described as follows: Commencing at the southwest corner of said Lot 2, then east along the south line of said Lot 2 a distance of 185.00 feet to the point of beginning of the centerline to be described, thence north a distance of 75.00 feet and there terminating. The temporary construction easement shall expire on July 1, 1992. Area of Permanent Easement' - 1,500 square feet Area of Temporary. Easement - 4,500 square feet Fee Owner - Lawrence W. Wenzel and Doneene R. Wenzel, husband and wife Mortgagee - Federal National Mortgage Association, a United States corporation • EXHIBIT "A" 697 Agenda Information Memo September 5, 1995 J. PROJECT 675R, RED OAKS ADDN ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: To receive the final assessment roll for Project 675R(Red Oaks Addition• Streets&Utilities)and order a public hearing to be held on October 3, 1995. FACTS: • The installation of public streets and utilities under the above-referenced project has been completed, all costs tabulated, and the final assessment roll prepared. This assessment roll is being presented to the City Council for their consideration of scheduling a public hearing to formally present and discuss any concerns associated with the allocation of costs associated with this public improvement. 30 Agenda Information Memo September 5, 1995 K. CONTRACT 95-13,NORTH RIDGE DR ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: To approve the plans and specifications for Contract 95-13 (North Ridge Drive - Utilities) and authorize the advertisement for a bid opening to be held at 10:30 a.m.,Wednesday, September 27, 1995. FACTS: • On August 1, the City Council reapproved the preliminary plat for the Gardenwood Ponds Addition. Subsequently, the developer has requested the City to install the streets and utilities within North Ridge Drive under a City contract. ' • Detailed plans and specifications for the installation of streets and utilities for North Ridge Drive (formerly Gardenwood Drive) was previously prepared, competitively bid and subsequently canceled due to the developer's inability to follow through with the final plat. • These previous detailed plans have been revised to conform to the modified preliminary plat approved by Council action on August 1. The street and utility installations will be performed under two separate contracts. • The detailed plans and specifications for the installation of utilities are now being presented to the City Council for their consideration of authorizing the advertisement for competitive bids. • It is anticipated that the final plat approval for the North Ridge Addition(formerly Gardenwood Ponds Addition)will be presented to the City Council for consideration of approval by September 20. 31 Agenda Information Memo September 5, 1995 Eagan City Council Meeting L. APPROVE JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT RUNWAY 4/22 MEDIATION SURVEY ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: To approve a joint powers agreement between the Runway 4/22 Mediation Cities, the Metropolitan Council and the Metropolitan Airports Commission to conduct a public opinion survey concerning noise mitigation techniques, preferences and impacts. FACTS: • The City has participated with the Cities of Richfield, Bloomington and Minneapolis, the Metropolitan Council and the Metropolitan Airports Commission in a mediation discussion • relative to the extension of Runway 4/22 and the noise mitigation alternatives associated with it. One of the tasks recommended by the mediation team is a survey of residents of the four communities to determine the possible benefits and consequences of sound insulation, property acquisition, redistribution of operations and other mitigation alternatives. • A series of propositions has been prepared for which questions will be developed by a survey consultant. • The Metropolitan Council will serve as the coordinating agency for the Request for Proposals for the survey service. Under the terms of the agreement, each participating agency will be responsible for 16.7% of the actual cost, not to exceed $20,000 per agency. Staff will advise the City Council of the actual amount of the contract and the City's share when proposals have been awarded. It is staffs recommendation that the City's contribution be allocated from the fund balance. ATTACHMENTS: / • Excerpt from RFP delineating propositions to be tested on pages3i through 3L! • Draft joint powers agreement on pages 37 through (/1 3pa. 08/29/95 12:51 FAX 612 229 2739 RTS X1002 pt1RPOSE The purpose of the survey is to determine the best land use/and/or aircraft operational procedures that would promote compatibility with the areas immediately surrounding the ASSUMPTIONS Certain assumptions will be agreed upon in advance of the survey to be used as givens. It is anticipated that the assumptions would be embodied in the"educational"component of the nnvey. 1. MSP will continue to function for a fifteen year time flame no matter the outcome of the Dual Track Planning Process 2. Operational changes and construction projects at MSP will occur during this time. 3. Land use,not noise insulation program, changes could occur during this period of time. 4. There will be an all Stage 3 fleet by the year 2000. PROPOSITIONS TOBE TESTED OR INFORMATION TO_BE GATHERED 1. That the survey would measure preferences among the population regarding various noise mitigation measures: A. Sound insulation B. Reduction of flights a. Total operations b.Equitable distribution of operations C. Acquisition of houses D. Reducing noisiness of individual planes E. "Best"noise mitigation in terns of what is desirable, equitable,cost-effective, and realistic. F. All Stage III aircraft R-98% ?2,414129 2739 08-29-95 01 :50PM P002 #17 08/29/95 12:51 FAX 812 229 2739 RTB 111003 H.Different departure profiles/procedures 2. That a measurement of mitigation preferences can be segmented depending on circumstances of the respondents. kLdn B. City C. Single family home versus apartment D. Near park or other amenity. E. On arterial road versus residential street 3. That the respondents categorize their annoyance on such factors as: A. Frequency B. Time of Day C. Seasonal D. Take off versus landing E. Ground Noise versus flight noise(eg. Run-ups,take-off break release, reverse thrust,taxing) F. Pitch G. Loudness H. Duration L Day of the week 4. That the survey provide demographic information to be correlated with responses to other questions. The demographic information should allow respondents to be grouped into psychographic clusters. A. Age • B. Length of time lived in the dwelling C. Economic status R-97% 61 229 2739 08-29-95 01 .50PM P003 #17 08/29/95 12:52 FAI 612 229 2739 RZS 21004 D. Educational level E. Marital status F. Gender G. Own or rent(for detached residential housing-eg. Single-family,duplex, quad units) K Use of the airport a. Purpose of use b.How often L Airport-related employment 5. That the survey define degree of activities impaired by aircraft noise. A. Sleep B. Speech interference 1. Indoors 2. Outdoors C. TV viewing 6. That the aircraft noise affects how property owners view the sale of their property or investment in it. A. How long to you plan to live in your present dwelling? B. Would aircraft noise be a factor in your decision to sell? C. Will aircraft noise be a factor in your decision to make improvements in your home? D. If greater investment would be made by your neighbors in their homes,would you be more likely to make an investment in yours? E. Would some program that offered home improvement help eligible to those in the noise impact area change your view of aircraft noise? 7. That there we measures that the communities working with MAC and the airlines could offer which would make homeowners less unhappy with the aircraft noise? 35 R-97% 612 229 2739 08-29-95 01 :50PM P004 #17 08/29/95 12:52 FAX 612 229 2739 RIB a005 A. Property tax rebates B. Income tax rebates C. Community amenities D. Free airline tickets 8. That the survey would measure how the community sets the following as positive, effective and/or responsive in regard to citizen/community access to decision makers. A Noise complaint hot line B. MASAC C. New organization • D. New pro-active stance on aircraft noise on the part of the MAC B. MAC F.Metropolitan Council G. Community 1) R=97% 6 229 2739 08-29-95 01 :50PM P005 #17 AUG-31-1995 15:49 FROM CITY OF BLOOMINGTON TO 96814612 P.02 THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into this day of September, 1995,by and between the Metropolitan Council,the Metropolitan Airports Commission,the City of Bloomington the City of Eagan,the City of hEmeapolis and the City of Richfield,hereinafter referred to as the"Agencies". W1T'NESSETH: WHEREAS, the Metropolitan Council did approve extension of runway 4-22 at MSP International Airport in July 1995,and WHEREAS, the Metropolitan Council in cooperation with the other Agencies did determine that the Agencies should have more time to investigate the malts of noise redistribution and other gyres to provide mitigation of aircraft noise, and WAS, it has been determined by the parties hereto that the noise mitigation selection process be continued by conducting a public preference survey to gauge public opinion about aircraft noise impact and preferred mitigation measures,and WHEREAS,the general objective in conducting a survey is to help resolve uncertainty about the most cost-effective aircraft noise mitigation measures at MSP International Airport and to be ready to use federal funds when they are available,and WIWB EAS, it has been determined that all of the said Agencies are a part of or have a specific interest in the stated objectives,and WHEREAS,the said Agencies will all benefit from the results of a public preference survey and are all willing to share proportionately in the cost of the preparation and completion of the survey, and WHEREAS, it is the expressed interest of said Agencies to participate and cooperate in the preparation and completion of the said survey, NOW,THEREFORE,IT IS MUTUALLY AGREED AS FOLLOWS: $ flON 1 -SCOPE OF WORK • The Agencies agree to jointly sponsor within their jurisdictions a public preference survey to gauge public opinion about aircraft noise impact and preferred mitigation measures. The questionnaire design, survey and report of results shall be performed by survey consultant(e) under the direction of the Metropolitan Council in consultation and cooperation with th3 Project Advisory Committee,which will act in an advisory role. 1 3 7 R-97% 612 948 8949 08-31-95 03 53PM P002 #04 AUG-31-1995 15:49 FROM CITY OF BLOOMINGTON TO 96814612 P.03 The Metropolitan Council will act as the contracting agent for engaging the services of survey consultants)to conduct the work. The Project Advisory Committee will review the list of interested firms,narrow the list of firms for further consideration based upon a technical proposal, and interview consultant firms if necessary. The Project Advisory Committee will recommend the selection of consultant firm(s)to the Metropolitan Council for their approval. SECTION 2-FURNISHING OF DATA The Agencies shall furnish to the consultant(s)any information or data they may have which is pertinent to the studies without separate compensation therefor or any adjustment of any Agency's share of the cost. The ownership of all data collected or developed shall be vested with the Metropolitan Council, subject to the right of all Agency participants to secure access to,receive and use a copy of all such data. Each Agency shall be entitled to ten(10)copies of all reports developed fbr the project and upon request,a copy of all other data collected or prepared in correction with the work. Credit shall be given to each participating agency in each report. Individual completion dates for reports prepared during the process shall be determined by vote of the Project Advisory Committee. SECTION 3-COMPENSATION The Metropolitan Council shall enter into a contract with a consultant firm(s)recommended by the Project Advisory Committee and approved by the Metropolitan Council. Notice of final execution of the consultant agreements shall be given to each Agency within seven V) • The consultant costs for the public preference survey shall be'hared by the Agencies in the proportions listed hereafter: • 2 3 84 R-97% 612 948 8949 08-31-95 03:53PM P003 #04 AUG-31-1995 15!50 FROM CITY OF BLOOMINGTON TO 96814612 P.64 fey Percent of Not to Exceed: Actual of Cost Metropolitan Council 16.7% $20,000 Metropolitan Airports Commission 16.7% $20,000 City of Bloomington 16.7% $20,000 City of Eagan 16.7% $20,000 City of Minneapolis 16.7% $20,000 �� Richfield 16-7% 100.0% $120,000 If it appears that the consultant services required to complete the desired work will exceed the total costs identified in Section 4 above,it shall be the responsibility of the Metropolitan Coup to request a supplemental agreement for the purpose of increasing the shares of the cog Agencies. If such supplemental agreement is not reached,the Project Advisory Committee shall determine how to proceed within the available budget. The Metropolitan Council will invoice the participating Agencies as provided by the Billowing schedule: 1) Two-thirds of the Agency's proportion of the contract amount at the time of execution of the consultant contract_ 2) One-third of the Agency's proportion of the costs upon completion of the consuhznt's final report. The Agencies will make payment within 30 days of receipt of said invoices. Upon completion of the final consultant report,the Metropolitan Council shall provide an accounting of receipts and expenditures to each contributing Agency and shall refund any remaining balance to each contributing Agency in proportion to that Agency's total contribution. SECTIQN_4-PROJECT ADVISORY COMMITTEE The Project Advisory Committee,chaired by the Metropolitan Council, shall be composed of not more than two policy and/or staff persotmel of each of these Agencies: • 3 37 • R=97% 612 948 8949 08-31-95 03 53PM P004 #04 clJG-31-1995 15:50 FROM CITY OF BLOCP1INGTON TO 96814612 P.05 Metropolitan Airports Commission Metropolitan Council City of Bloomington City ofEagan City ofRichfield City ofneapoiis Each Agency shall have one vote on Project Advisory Committee actions. The Project Advisory Committee may take action by a majority vote of those Agencies present at a meeting. The Agencies, acting through the Project Advisory Committee representatives,shall at all reasonable times during the terms of this agreement be afforded the opportunity for review of the work being performed. The Agencies shall also be able to obtain copies of reports, studies and data compiled for the studies without additional cost. The Project Advisory Committee shall meet as determined by the Committee or its Chair and shall act as a liaison for their Agencies. IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties hereto have duly executed this agreement by their proper officers and representatives. METROPOLITAN COUNCIL METROPOLITAN AIRPORTS cork ISSION By By - Regional Administrator Executive Director Date Date By By Chief Counsel Commission Secretary Date Date CITY OF BLOOMINGTON By Date Mayor . By, Date City Manager 4 o R-97% 612 948 8949 08-31-95 03:53PM P005 *04 AUG-31-1995 15:50 FROM CITY OF BLOOMINGTON TO 96814612 P.06 CITY OF EAGAN BY Date Mayor By Date City Clerk CITY OF MINNE.APOI1S By Date Mayo' By Date City Clerk By Date City Attorney By Date City Finance Officer CTTY OF RICHFIELD • By Date Mayor By_ Date City Manager 5 TOTAL P.06 8-975 612 948 8949 08-31-95 03:53PM P006 #04 Agenda Information Memo September 5, 1995 Eagan City Council Meeting M. APPROVE RESOLUTION TO ISSUE AND SELL GENERAL OBLIGATION IMPROVEMENT BONDS. SERIES 1995A: GENERAL OBLIGATION EOUIPMENT CERTIFICATES OF INDEBTEDNESS. SERIES 1995B; AND GENE• • OBLIGATION IMPROVEMENT REFUNDING BONDS, SERIES 1995 C, ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: To approve a resolution to issue and sell General Obligation Improvement bonds, Series 1995A, General Obligation Equipment Certificates of Indebtedness, Series 1995B and General Obligation Improvement Refunding Bonds, Series 1995C. FACTS: • The City did not sell equipment certificates or improvement bonds during 1994. is The General Obligation Improvements Bonds, Series 1995A will provide permanent financing for 24 public improvement projects which are now completed and assessed or will be in the near future. The bond amount will be approximately $3,305,000. • The General Obligation Equipment Certificates of Indebtedness, Series 1995B will provide financing for the 1994 and 1995 equipment revolving fund at $400,000 per year. These proceeds combined with the dedicated ad valorem tax levy provide the $500,000 annual funding for the equipment section of the City's Capital Improvement Program. A debt service levy is incorporated in the taxes payable for 1996 to begin repayment of this obligation. The obligation will be repaid over a five year period. • The General Obligation Improvement Refunding Bonds, Series 1995C will refund the General Obligation Improvement Bonds, Series 1989A. The 1989 bonds were sold at a net interest cost of 6.40% in an original amount of $9,325,000. Using some of the current cash balance and proceeds from the sale of approximately $3,275,000 of refunding bonds, the City will call the remaining principal of $4,750,000 on the 1989 bonds on February 1, 1996. The new bonds are expected to have a net interest cost of 4.92%. The transaction is estimated to generate a present value savings of approximately$290,000. Movement in interest rates may change both the issue size and savings, although it is expected that the refunding will remain feasible and appropriate. • Final sale recommendations are being completed by Springsted, the City's fiscal consultant, and additional detailed information will be provided to the City Council as the work proceeds and more sale details are available. • The sale is scheduled for October 17, 1995 with settlement in November. 4 01-- Agenda Information Memo September 5, 1995 Eagan City Council Meeting N. FINAL SUBDIVISION - CENTEX VERMILLION ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: To approve the Final Subdivision, Centex Vermillion, east of Highway 13 and south of Robin Lane. FACTS: • The final plans, development contract, and security agreements have been reviewed and are in order. BACKGROUND/ATTACHMENTS: (1) ' Plat Maps, pagee ie.threttglr--..- EXHIBIT "A" One of three CENTEX VERMILION / J "_ _• /_......____.____Tt-- - +•; / , I / , t I ,,# / . ,';'. ,-N. / • /■/ . - :• \ 'sane. �,,7• , Z'`. \ ��4 / F ♦ •; ' tom` ' . -."6 •, ∎y ' \ r ...-...�......-..-.r. / 4j a'- .1,� -r�t .. - �- - -�. .rte \//-�` `••,►�• 1{ rte" __.t ,-,I. . .,• s [�fI r i, 1 •L.^-�1\i ";"1-'44-1--r-`` k.,4 fl. ' .--- 1- i /"• . • , ; ' 1 y" �' • - k 4 • �LY 1 --=-t' !' -- - r .,_ L .RECEIVED 1' •' .)- 4:.....Liz-.tiz• ''i- ECAUG 10 1995 ` _•.., -.- 4 3 - EXHIBIT "A" Two of three CENTEX VERMILION / , «r«;" • / I I :, j la:j.,-E...-...-----—:: ° ' si ai, / , .�2+i. h / i ,,•'3 ``j / tT - / I f t 1 / 4 / , . / '..a.: t.. 2 , ! i ',1. 1 S Fh j'' ............ .._... OVROr A - - --- ---=--L C;7. r::■.1:1c1. . to i / S' At • I ovnor C I f! , "`"`-"".. e ,44fre2 L RECEIVED AUG 10 1995 I�.s '-r )1\ I • ,_- _ .........ON/ • r "' "m IIEITNOOD EXHIBIT "A" Throe of throe CENTEX VERMILION SIMS Um ii r sow v, lilt II i Ict f ` 1 I • \--::---- 1 1 Is 3 _ ti I is• f! { •olff. _. a.i f ., i 4• 4 1� r r.r. %t, - -fir.• -`1r'.=-si=' 1 - .r.r -. '1. OUROT C ..�....• s� _ _. r , —urr 1 rrra'1 1 I SI , yuw-.[X'S.-:iR I}..CS' Clk ' !w:'= C2Y I fK'JJC:.CIx 1 I !R'9�4' AI:: 1 VS MCI= LCS'}e't.X R' iIII V.I r•a.own..r.....r, 1 ' I t RECE NEp Slip i 0f9 ..................... - t STWOOO c T .— Agenda Information Memo September 5, 1995 O. CONTRACT 93-KK, STONEBRIDGE PONDS ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: To acknowledge completion of public improvements under Contract 93-KK (Stonebridge Ponds - Streets&Utilities) and authorize perpetual City maintenance subject to warranty provisions. FACTS: • The installation of public utilities for the Stonebridge Ponds Addition(located north of Diffley and west of Dodd Road) was performed privately by the developer under the terms and conditions of the development contract agreement. • The installation of these improvements has been completed, inspected by City authorized personnel and found to be in conformance with the contract plans and specifications and in order for Council consideration of acceptance for perpetual City maintenance. 145 Agenda Information Memo September 5, 1995 P. CONTRACT 94-02,VIOLET LANE& YANKEE DOODLE ROAD, ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: Authorize the 3rd and final payment for Contract 94-02 (Villas of Violet Lane& Yankee Doodle Road) to Northdale Construction, Inc., in the amount of$28,883.45 and authorize perpetual City maintenance subject to warranty provisions. FACTS: • The installation of streets and utilities to service the Villas of Violet Lane development(Project 674)and the reconstruction of Yankee Doodle Road within the Sibley Terminal Industrial Park (Project 661R)have been completed, inspected by City authorized personnel and found to be in order for authorization of final payment and acceptance for perpetual maintenance. (.4 (e Agenda Information Memo September 5, 1995 O. CONTRACT 93-ZZ, SAFARI(a,EAGAN 2ND ADDN ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: To acknowledge completion of public improvements under Contract 93-ZZ (Safari @ Eagan 2nd Addition-Utilities)and authorize perpetual City maintenance subject to warranty provisions. FACTS: • The installation of public utilities for the Safari @ Eagan 2nd Addition(LifeTime Fitness located north of Cliff and west of Thomas Lake Road)was performed privately by the developer under the terms and conditions of the development contract agreement. • The installation of these improvements has been completed, inspected by City authorized personnel and found to be in conformance with the contract plans and specifications and in order for Council consideration of acceptance for perpetual City maintenance. • t4 7 Agenda Information Memo September 5, 1995 R CONTRACT 93-I,LEXINGTON POINTE 9TH ADDN ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: To acknowledge completion of public improvements under Contract 93-I (Lexington Pointe 9th Addition - Streets & Utilities) and authorize perpetual City maintenance subject to warranty provisions. FACTS: • The installation of public utilities for the Lexington Pointe 9th Addition(south of Diffley and east of Lexington Avenue) was performed privately by the developer under the terms and conditions of the development contract agreement. • The installation of these improvements has been completed, inspected by City authorized personnel and found to be in conformance with the contract plans and specifications and in order for Council consideration of acceptance for perpetual City maintenance. L Agenda Information Memo September 5, 1995 $. CONTRACT 92-I,WESTON HILLS ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: To acknowledge completion of public improvements under Contract 92-I(Weston Dills- Streets& Utilities)and authorize perpetual City maintenance subject to warranty provisions. FACTS: • The installation of public utilities for Weston Hills (south of Cliff Road and east of TH 3)was performed privately by the developer under the terms and conditions of the development contract agreement. • The installation of these improvements has been completed, inspected by City authorized personnel and found to be in conformance with the contract plans and specifications and in order for Council consideration of acceptance for perpetual City maintenance. 7 Agenda Information Memo September 5, 1995 T. CONTRACT 94-EE, TRAILS END ADDITION ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: To acknowledge completion of public improvements under Contract 94-EE(Trails End Addition- Streets&Utilities)and authorize perpetual City maintenance subject to warranty provisions. FACTS: • The installation of public utilities for Trails End Addition (located west of Elrene Road and south of Yankee Doodle Road) was performed privately by the developer under the terms and conditions of the development contract agreement. • The installation of these improvements has been completed, inspected by City authorized personnel and found to be in conformance with the contract plans and specifications and in order for Council consideration of acceptance for perpetual City maintenance. ,60 Agenda Information Memo September 5, 1995 Eagan City Council Meeting U. REFUSE HAULERS COMMERCIAL LICENSES UWS TRANSFER INC. & WASTE CONTROL SYSTEMS, ST. PAUL ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: To approve commercial haulers licenses for UWS Transfer Inc. and Waste Control Systems subject to submittal of certificates of insurance by each applicant showing coverage extended through September 1, 1996. FACTS: • Applications for the above-referenced commercial hauling licenses are in order for consideration by the City Council. Because each applicant is requesting a multi-dwelling/commercial hauling license, they are not subject to the residential hauling moratorium which was enacted by the City Council to permit review of the residential refuse and recycling hauling system. ATTACHMENTS: Application copies on pages S rough 5.5-. S( 05-19-95 10:04AM FROM CITY OF EAGAN TO 94885096 P003/003 .3:30 Pilot? knob Road Eagan, MI • 55122-1897 ‘274 7f13 (612)681-M600 CITY OF EAGAN APPLICATION P'OR LICENSE REFUSE/RECYCLING I' hereby make application for a Refuse/Recycle license for they year OWNER: i United Waste Systems, Inc. Four Greenwich Office Park Name Address Greenwich CT 06830 City 203-622-3131 State zip Telephone HUSINESSNJE: WASTE CONTROL SYSTEMS , INC . d/b/a WASTE CONTROL Address 95 West Ivy Avenue St . Paul , MN 55117 227-6394 City State zip Telephone ' Nunicipaliities where presently licensed: 7 county metro area SCHEDULE OF FENS AND REQUIR87O'NTS: Type of License Residential Dwelling ($50 first truck/525 each additional) Required for haulers serving single family detached, duplex and four-plex unite. -- includes Residential Recycling License at no additional fee. -- Additional requirements outlined in Hauling Ordinance ac attached. X Multiple Dwelling/Commercial ($50 first truck/$25 each additional) -- Required for haulers serving multiple family dwellings larger than four-plexes and commercial accounts. -- Permits, but does not require commercial recycling provided that documentation of quantities recycled is provided to the City. Contact recycling staff for details. -- Includes Residential Recycling License at no additional fee. -- Additional requirements outlined in Hauling Ordinance as attached. Residential Recycling ($50 first truck/$25 each additional) -- Required for haulers performing residential recycling for single family, duplex, four-plex and multi-family residential. -- Applicable to independent firms and subcontractors to licensed haulers. combination Residential Dwelling/Multiple Dwelling/commercial ($75 first truck/$25 each additional) -- Permits service to all types of refuse accounts. -- Includes requirements as defined for each individual license. -- Includes Residential Recycling License at no additional fee. NUXBER OP ;TRUCKS TO OPERATE IN EAGAN: 4 • TO CALCULATE LICENSE FEE • individ a1 license 1 truck 9 $50 + 3 trucks at $25 - 1.5.00 Combination license 1 truck 9 $75 + trucks at S25 = PROVIDE: Mgtor Vehicle Workers Comp I4surance Insuranue - Will be sup1lted f c United Waste ae !lcedule expires 1 expires Rate - $125 - $165 plus disposal fees A0411:11. CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE 11 ri. .0 DATE(MM 95 PRODUCER THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION ONLY AND JOHNSON&HIGGINS CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER.THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AMEND,EXTEND OR ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE ATT ELAINE DEVIVO POLICIES BELOW. THREE CENTER PLAZA COMPANIES AFFORDING COVERAGE BOSTON,MA 02108 (617)557-5794 COMPANY LETTER A INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA COMPANY INSURED LETTER B PACIFIC EMPLOYERS WASTE CONTROL SYSTEMS INC COMPANY 95 WEST IVY LETTER C NATIONAL UNION FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY ST.PAUL,MN 55117 COMPANY D LETTER COMPANY E LETTER :caV ►GEs THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD INDICATED, NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT,TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN, THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS, EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH POLICIES.LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS. COI TYPE OF INSURANCE POUCY NUMBER POLICY EFFECTIVE POLICY EXPIRATION j LIMITS LTR' DATE(MM/DD/YY) DATE(MM/DD/YY) GENERAL LIABILITY GENERAL AGGREGATE $ N/A A X 1 COMMERCIAL GENERAL UABILITY HDOG 0962363-2 09/01/94 09/01/95 PRODUCTS-COMP/OP AGG $ 2,000,000 CLAIMS MADE! X OCCUR. PERSONAL&ADV INJURY 1$ 1,000,000 {OWNER'S&CONTRACTOR'S PROT EACH OCCURRENCE I$ 1,000,000 I FIRE DAMAGE(Any one fire) $ 500,000 MED.EXPENSE(Anyoneperson) $ 10,000 A AUTOMOBILE UABIUTY ISA 807135 09/01/94 09/01/95 COMBINED SINGLE )( ANY AUTO LIMIT $ 1,000 1 I ALL OWNED AUTOS BODILY INJURY I I SCHEDULED AUTOS (Per person) I$ HIRED AUTOS I ( i BODILY INJURY I NON-OWNED AUTOS i(Per accident) $ i GARAGE LIABILITY I i I ,PROPERTY DAMAGE $ I C EXCESS UABIUTY 8E3095621 - 09/01/94 09/01/95 I EACH OCCURRENCE I$ 5,000,000 X UMBRELLA FORM AGGREGATE i$ OTHER THAN UMBRELLA FORM B WLRC 4111004-1 09/01/94 09/01/95 I STATUTORY LIMITS WORKER'S COMPENSATION SCFC 4111005-3 EACH ACCIDENT $ 1,000,000 AND DISEASE-POLICY LIMIT $ 1,000,000 EMPLOYERS'UABIUTY DISEASE-EACH EMPLOYEE $ 1,000,000 OTHER DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS/LOCATIONSNEHICLES/SPECIAL ITEMS SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE THE CITY OF EAGAN EXPIRATION DATE THEREOF, THE ISSUING COMPANY WILL ENDEAVOR TO 3830 PILOT KNOB ROAD MAIL 30 DAYS WRITTEN NOTICE TO THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER NAMED TOT' EAGAN, MN 55122 LEFT, BUT FAILURE TO MAIL SUCH NOTICE SHALL IMPOSE NO OBLIGATION . LIABILITY OF ANY KIMUNNSOWN-R,Q0Itiftirii a TOR REPRESENTATIVES. AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE a0 la,I.,v. g� ::ACQRD 25=S#14)t#} . :. i AC ��P([T ORATfON 1990.C1/4 04-19-95 02:53PM FROM CITY OF EAGAN TO 93390064 P005/005 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55122-1897 (512)681-4600 CITY OF EAGAN APPLICATION FOR LICENSE REFUSE/RECYCLING I, John N. Milne hereby make application for a Refuse/Recycle license for the year 1944 OWNER: United Waste Systems, Inc. 4 Greenwich Office Park Name Address Greenwich CT 06830 203/622-3131 City State Zip Telephone BUSINESS NAME: United Waste Transfer, Inc. 400 Whitall Street Address St. 7aul MN 55101 776-2323 City State zip Telephone Municipalities where presently licensed: none - newly formed corporation ecIEDULE OP PEES AND *zQt7INAMMTS: Type of License Residential Dwelling ($50 first truck/$25 each additional) -- Required for haulers serving single family detached, duplex and four-plex units. -- Includes Residential Recycling License at no additional fee. -- Additional requirements outlined in Mauling Ordinance no attached. XX Multiple Dwelling/commercial ($50 first truck/$25 each additional) -- Required for haulers serving multiple family dwellings larger than four-plexes and commercial accounts. - PerMite, but does not of quantities recycled require provided rtoathe City.recycling provided ntact recycli g documentation of details. -- Includes Residential Recycling License at no additional fee. -- Additional requirements outlined in Hauling Ordinance as attached. Residential Recycling ($50 first truck/$25 each additional) -- Required for haulers performing residential recycling for single family, duplex, four-plex and multi-family residential. -- Applicable to independent firms and subcontractors to licensed hauler*. Combination Residential Dwelling/Multiple Dwelling/Commercial ($75 first truck/525 each additional) -- Permits service to all types of refuse accounts. -- Includes requirements as defined for each individual license. -- Includes Residential Recycling License at no additional fee. NUMBER OF TRUCKS TO OPERATE IN EAGAN; 2 TO CALCULATE LICENSE FEE 1 trucks at $25 $75.00 Individual license 1 truck @ $50 + Combination license 1 truck @ 575 +------ trucks at 525 = PROVIDE: Motor Vehicle xx Workers' Comp XX Insurance Rate Schedule expires expires 8/31/95— 5 A OI:DDe CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE ISSUE DATE(MM/DD/1Y) 08 / PRODUCER THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION ONLY AND JOHNSON 8 HIGGINS CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER.THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AMEND,EXTEND OR ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE ATT. ELAINE DEVIVO POLICIES BELOW. THREE CENTER PLAZA BOSTON,MA 02108 COMPANIES AFFORDING COVERAGE (617)557-5794 COMPANY LETTER A INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA COMPANY INSURED LETTER B PACIFIC EMPLOYERS UWS TRANSFER,INC. 400 WHITEHALL ST. COMPANY C LETTER NATIONAL UNION FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY ST.PAUL,MN 55101 COMPANY D LETTER COMPANY E LETTER • THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD INDICATED, NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT,TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN, THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS, EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH POLICIES.LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS. I Lam' TYPE OF INSURANCE POLICY NUMBER POLICY EFFECTIVE I POLICY EXPIRATION UNITS 1i DATE(MM/DD/YY) DATE(MM/DDNY) GENERAL UABIUTY I GENERAL AGGREGATE I$ N/A A■X COMMERCIAL GENERAL UABIUTY HDOG 09623632 09/01/94 09/01/95 PRODUCTS-COMP/OP AGG. I$ 2,000,000 I. CLAIMS MADE X OCCUR. PERSONAL&ADV INJURY t$ 1,000,000 OWNER'S&CONTRACTOR'S PROT EACH OCCURRENCE I$ 1,000,000 I FIRE DAMAGE(Any one fire) I$ I MED.EXPENSE(Any one person)'' $ A II AUTOMOBILE UABIUTY ISA 807135 09/01/94 09/01/95 COMBINED SINGLE I$ 1,000 X 'ANY AUTO UMIT 'ALL OWNED AUTOS � BODILY INJURY $ '—�SCHEDULED AUTOS I (Per person) I I HIRED AUTOS I I BODILY INJURY $ 'NON-OWNED AUTOS I (Per accident) I GARAGE UABIUTY PROPERTY DAMAGE • $ C EXCESS UABIUTY 8E3095621 09/01/94 09/01/95 EACH OCCURRENCE $ 5,000,000 X UMBRELLA FORM AGGREGATE $ OTHER THAN UMBRELLA FORM B WLRC 41110041 09/01/94 09/01/95 I STATUTORY UMITS WORKER'S COMPENSATION SCFC 41110053 EACH ACCIDENT $ 1,000,000 AND EMPLOYERS LIABILITY DISEASE–POLICY UMIT $ 1,000,000 DISEASE–EACH EMPLOYEE $ 1,000,000 OTHER DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS/LOCATIONSNEHICLES/SPECIAL ITEMS 'CERTIFICATE HOLDER AN ,t y Cpl SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE THE CITY OF EAGAN EXPIRATION DATE THEREOF, THE ISSUING COMPANY WILL ENDEAVOR TO 3830 PILOT KNOB ROAD MAIL 30 DAYS WRITTEN NOTICE TO THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER NAMED TO Ti EAGAN,MN 55122 LEFT, BUT FAILURE TO MAIL SUCH NOTICE SHALL IMPOSE NO OBLIGATION L LIABILITY OF ANY KIND UPON THE COMPANY, ITS AGENTS OR REPRESENTATIVES. AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE JOHNSON&nn,isiN OF MASSACHUSETI5,••IACDRD, .S VJ90 . . .. , .. . : ., ,., . :,,. .8Y., r 199( : . . RpORATtON ATTORNEY Agenda Information Memo September 5, 1995 Eagan City Council Meeting V. CIGARETTE LICENSES, APPLEBAUM COMPANIES DBA BIG TOP LIQUOR, 3900 BEAU D'RUE DRIVE: AND SIDCO, INC. BIG TOP LIQUOR, 1282 TOWN CENTRE DRIVE ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: To approve cigarette licenses for Applebaum Companies and Sidco, Inc., doing business as Big Top Liquor Stores at the addresses indicated above. FACTS: Staff is in receipt of applications for the above referenced establishments. The applications have been reviewed and are in order for consideration by the City Council at this time. ATTACHMENTS: • Application forms enclosed without page number. 54' Agenda Information Memo September 5, 1995 Eagan City Council Meeting W. HOLZ FARM STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: Authorize staff to seek professional consultant services to perform a building/structural analysis of Holz Farm buildings. FACTS: • The probable cost for this service is estimated at between $4,000 and $7,000. • Holz Farm Study Committee recommended use of a consultant to assist them in determining physical options for the buildings. • The APRNRC concurred with the Holz Farm Committee and recommended to the City Council to find a consultant. • City inspectors have reviewed the site and suggested the City hire a consultant to do a more thorough review. ISSUES: • There were no funds budgeted for this in 1995. However, due to position vacancies within the department, a transfer of funds could be made to cover this expenditure. 57 Agenda Information Memo September 5, 1995 X. CONTRACT 94-03,BLACKHAWK& BLUE CROSS ROAD ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: Approve the 10th and final payment for Contract 94-03 (Blackhawk&Blue Cross Road-Utility& Street Reconstruction)in the amount of$21,159.85 to McNamara Contracting, Inc., and authorize acceptance for perpetual City maintenance subject to warranty provisions. FACTS: • All work associated with the above-referenced contract has been completed, inspected by representatives of the Public Works Department and found to be in order for favorable consideration of final payment and acceptance for perpetual maintenance. 58 Agenda Information Memo September 5, 1995 Y. CONTRACT 94-M, STONEBRIDGE PONDS 2ND ADDITION ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: To acknowledge completion of public improvements under Contract 94-M(Stonebridge Ponds 2nd Addition - Streets & Utilities) and authorize perpetual City maintenance subject to warranty provisions. FACTS: • The installation of public utilities for the Stonebridge Ponds 2nd Addition (located north of Di$ley and west of Dodd Road)was performed privately by the developer under the terms and conditions of the development contract agreement. • The installation of these improvements has been completed, inspected by City authorized personnel and found to be in conformance with the contract plans and specifications and in order for Council consideration of acceptance for perpetual City maintenance. SI Agenda Information Memo September 5, 1995 Z. CONTRACT 93-E,WESTON HILLS 2ND ADDITION ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: To acknowledge completion of public improvements under Contract 93-E (Weston Ills 2nd Addition - Streets & Utilities) and authorize perpetual City maintenance subject to warranty provisions. FACTS: • The installation of public utilities for the Weston Bills 2nd Addition (located south of Cliff and east of TH 3)was performed privately by the developer under the terms and conditions of the development contract agreement. • The installation of these improvements has been completed, inspected by City authorized personnel and found to be in conformance with the contract plans and specifications and in order for Council consideration of acceptance for perpetual City maintenance. (DO Agenda Information Memo September 5, 1995 A. COVENTRY PASS 5TH ADDN VACATION ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: To close the public hearing and approve the vacation of a public road and drainage easements as described subject to the concurrent recording of replacement easements within the proposed Coventry Pass 5th Addition within Inver Grove Heights. FACTS: • On August 15, the City Council received a petition from the developer (R.H. Development Company)requesting the City to vacate a temporary roadway cul-de-sac easement(Tyne Lane) and a ponding/drainage easement previously dedicated over property located in Inver Grove Heights within the proposed Coventry Pass 5th Addition development. • These easements were conveyed to the City of Eagan as a condition of the City of Eagan's approval for the Coventry Pass 3rd Addition final subdivision with the mutual understanding that it would be replaced at some future date when the adjacent property within Inver Grove Heights was subdivided and platted. • The final plat of the Coventry Pass 5th Addition within Inver Grove Heights adequately replaces these roadway and drainage easements with new easements properly described to address the general public and the City of Eagan's needs. It is therefore appropriate to vacate the original easements conveyed to the City. ATTACHMENTS: • General location map, page (9 )11— • Roadway easement sketch and description, page 6 3 • Drainage easement sketch and description, page G tf C c0_ t--= -r=-- ----------13400 51~` ~ cn . . • .1.11 .2.\* ,� r 10..c---7,Al i 1..0 I o I N i, ••` • �i �T, RrAV OR. CT <�V AK w. vai. .,1 • e� , I. � . -- --- 1I--- 3600 CRT •AK WESCOTT• T u 9 STATION T. �} PARK • P�- , � � .. ice• w 39 , fj, . ,, `rSyp,�r CT. I C�• .4, w 6 T b . •VERIOOK PL. SOUTH a ,vow&rte S.N.SW CR. • , 0 O 2 I • MDT I V !+ Hrw LH ANDERNC WALK PA- ♦ ..' WE SC SCOTT ROAD 1 H. AI � 1- -------- -•---I. :.-I,-,.,.wi----r. .p,---. 1--A VOCI\ P ;•7r.i � � iv % •.moo+'. • • LAKE r .' PARD� r , S S. I '. , . Ts ire -, 0 v . 41 ,...______ It A . e; . . /? N 4 CAPTA ,y R TH * 10 po Q M}}}att(( W I I. OUNT V ` RYA. d• AY E+ iti Y ROAD C+ ,. aA�� , A Y b r _. �.1 T =.�=�• --— -- - - •--=_ -.-y 4200 j VACATION REQUEST SITE City of eagan approved: standard VACATION REQUEST FOR STREET AND PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENTS, COVENTRY PASS plate #: 0 -/ WORKS 5TH ADDITION IN INV. GR. HTS. DEPARTMENT Ye/ ■ . 2422 Enterprise Drive * *4 Mendota Heights, MN 55120 *PIONEER ,,,Q,,,,,re„. �� (612) 681-1914 FAX:681-9488 *engineering UN, "0"s• ICA C&5��n 625 Highway 10 N.E. * * ** Blaine. MN 55434 (612) 783-1880 FAX:783-1883 Certificate of Survey for: R. H. DEVELOPMENT, INC. Ver \;�EASEMENT p ; 'd�• TO BE y.,' \tq�, VACATED - _ S�230 -30_ 30 ENE' COR. 0UTLOT A, 60 T�..HAST LINE Of OUTLOT A, COVENTRY PASS q COVENTRY PASS _ I WW 4 ItJ V%i� R'1 ZZ I ,- n nr ADDITION EASEpsytENT Doc . IVo. loo 1174 PROPOSED EASEMENT VACATION A 60.00 fodt wide turn around easement for roadway purposes over and across the following described property: The North Half of the Northwest Quarter of Section 19, Township 27, Range 22. Dakota County, Minnesota. The centerline of said easement is described as follows: Commencing at the northeast corner of Outlot A, Coventry Pass as platted and of record in the office of the County Recorder, Dakota County, Minnesota; thence on an assumed bearing of South 00 degrees 23 minutes 16 seconds East, along the east line of said Outlot A, 172.00 feet to the point of beginning of the line to be described: thence North 89 degrees 36 minutes 44 seconds East, a distance of 56.00 feet and there terminating. Together with that part which lies within the circumference of a circle having a 56.00 foot radius. The center of said circle is the terminus of the above described centerline. ME HEREBY CERTIFY TO R. H. DEVELOPMENT, INC. THAT THIS SURVEY, PLAN OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME, OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION, AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED LAND SURVEYOR UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA, DATED THIS 3RD DAY OF JANUARY, 1995. SIGNED: PR ENGINEERI BY: ....i. r John C. Larson, Land Surveyor Minnesota License No. 19828 Scale: 1 inch = so feet (p 9 99j 94172 : ** * Enterprise Drive*PIONEER LANDsunvcyons•Civil.CNGiNCLns Mendota Heights,MN 55120 en ineerin LA"°LAMM'•LAN a.ean�► t 9 9•• 1st21 sst•tsta EA55n a-4' Dov »4 NO, loci/I2422 ' Certificate of Survey for: ASPEN PROPERTIES, INC. I ;A/W Coble, Or Mr NW) ,f ' 2e/ioin/9, Township. 27, A t a Cv EASn MENT TO BE VACATED �� N An easement for drainage purposes over and across that part of the North Ralf , the Northwest Quarter of Section 19, essehip 27, Range 22, Dakota panty, Minnesota described as folio,.; 1(.1 Omme cing at the northwest corner of said Nxtlsiest Quarter: thence tCZ.--- i on an Reared bearing of South 0 degrees 23 minutes 16 accords East, O• �/ V along the west line of said Northwest Quarter, a distance of 1210.24 feet to the point of beginning ing of the easement to be described; thence feet; thence 75 13 seconds East, a distance of 190.85 \It% t� N II': i degrees 09 minutes 50 seconds East, a distance `+ s0 of 164.93 feet; thence South 59 degrees 08 minutes 04 seconds bast, a distance of 69.40 feet; thence South 42 degrees 23 minutes Ogg sands 'Q East, and distance of 116.97 feet; thence South 26 degrees L minutes 12 seconds East, •distance of 37.32 feet, said point hereinafter C known as Point A; thence continuing South 26 degrees 16 minutes 12 -� � ce. msannda East, •distance of 50.40 feet; thence South 0 degrees M ^ 9 _ minutes 29 asmids Nest, •distance of 51.60 feet, thence South 30 S f degrees 30■nut,. 03 seconds Neat, a distance of 60.35 bet, thence South 34 degrees 37 minutes 15 seconds Nast, •distance of 114.84 -Y� feet, thence South 57 degrees 00 minutes 34 sends Nest, •distance 11 • of 158.43 feet, thence South 65 degrees 51 minutes 06 seconds Nest, a i distance of 28.24 feet; thence North 89 degrees 11 minutes 31 seconds Nest, a distance of 38.99 feet, thence North 62 degrees 37 minutes 37 i anoxic!'Nest, a distance of 44.70 feet; thence North 47 degrees 13 minutes 37 seconds Nest, •distance of 195.08 feet; thence North 0 \ Ct degrees[23 minutes 16 seconds Not, •distance of 229.97 feet to the \ N; .C ther with a 20.00 foot wide easement for drainage / O� oofsaid easement is described as follows: grape purpossa, the center lint Beginning at the above aforesaid Point A; thence North 58 degrees of // S minutes 54 ',cords East, •distance of 603.96 feet to the Chicago itiliackee St. Paul and Pacific Railroad Right-of-Nay and there *43 terminating. // 1.------..€.6.-o / // • A�/ .c P_sv,E / i, 0 E y / APP ((Alb /�� � PL P � / , / ti. Ipp°r 1 ,I >>s c / ,• p ]} • I -- 0( d5e�er r~ ' L /`' tie •J,.. �+`. .rJ %/�+i4 • • /1.,' Irlf shown Or�-` 'e &Named-- . ,, ZIp sic o r: 6. S c a l e: 1 • 109 tit I hereby certify that this survey,plan or report urn premed by me or under my direct supervision and that I am duly Registered Land Surveyor under the Nut of the State of Minnesota.Dated thisgaiL.day of SEPTEMBER A.D.19 ki— .. ,irl...... e JOHN C. LARSON L.S. REG. NQ 19628 i W Agenda Information Memo September 5, 1995 Eagan City Council Meeting it @.'tkAo:r;.' : A. OAKPOINTE OF EAGAN - COMPREHENSIVE GUIDE PLAN AMENDMENT & PRELIMINARY PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AMENDMENT & PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION, ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: 1. To approve or deny the Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment changing the Comprehensive Guide Plan from LB -Limited Business to D-II -Mixed Residential (0-6 u/ac). 2. To approve or deny a Preliminary Planned Development for 35 zero lot line single family homes. 3. To approve or deny a Preliminary Subdivision of 35 lots and four Outlots on 10.3 acres located west of Galaxie Avenue, east of Plaza Drive and south of Cliff Road in the NW Vs of Section 32. FACTS: • The Advisory Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on this proosed Preliminary Subdivision at its regular meeting on June 27, 1995. The Commission recommends approval of the Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment,Preliminary Planned Development and the Preliminary Subdivision subject to conditions. • At its July 11, 1995 City Council meeting, the Council recommended approval of the Comprehensive Guide Plan subject to the Metropolitan Council's approval of the proposal. • The Metropolitan Council reviewed and approved the Comprehensive Plan Amendment for the OakPointe of Eagan development and determined that the proposed amendment has no potential impact upon any of the metropolitan system plans. BACKGROUND/ATTACHMENTS: (4) Letter from Metropolitan Council page Minutes of the July 11, 1995 City Council Meeting pages through (� Minutes of Planning Co ssion - ages through? . Staff Report- pages 7 'through Ce 5 Metropolitan Council • Working for the Region, Planning for the Future RECEIVED AUG 0 4 1995 August 2, 1995 Ms. Shannon Tyree City of Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan MN 55101-1634 RE: City of Eagan Oak Pointe of Eagan Land Use Change Plan Amendment Metropolitan Council District 15 Metropolitan Council Referral File No. 16142-6 Dear Ms. Tyree: The Metropolitan Council staff has reviewed the city of Eagan's plan amendment received by the Council on July 27, 1995. The amendment proposes to change the land use designation on 10.3 acres of land from Planned Development—Limited Business to Mixed Residential. We have determined that the proposed amendment has no potential impact upon any of the metropolitan system plans. Therefore, the city may place the amendment into effect immediately. Because the proposed amendment appears unlikely to affect policies and plans in other chapters of the Metropolitan Development Guide, the Council will waive further review and comment on this amendment. The amendment, explanatory materials supplied and the information submission form will be appended to the city's plan in the Council's files. This concludes the Council's review. Sincerely, /4-..,<_0156 Chuck Ballentine Director, Office of Local Assistance CB:ret cc: Kevin Howe, Metropolitan Council District 15 Lynda Voge, Metropolitan Council Staff Richard Thompson, Metropolitan Council Staff Ruth Ann Sobnosky, MnDOT . .. • 6) c° 230 East Fifth Street St.Paul.Minnesota 55101-1634 (612) 291-6359 Fax 291-6550 IUD/71Y 291-0904 Metro Info Line 229-3780 An&pad OpPon ntgl pgployer EAGAN CITY COUNCIL MINUTES;JULY 11,1895 PAGE 8 seconded a motion to approve the preliminary draft of a joint agreement with the Minnesota Moose, and direct staff to continue the process for finalization and approval by the Council. Aye: 5 Nay: 0 �81StNES$ COMPREHENSIVE GUIDE PLAN AMENDMENT, PREUMINARY PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AND PREUMINARY SUBDIVISION, OAKPOINT OF EAGAN After introductions by Mayor Egan and Administrator Hedges, Community Development Director Reichert gave a staff report. Jim Dimond, representing the applicant, explained the proposed development and urged Council approval. Considerable discussion followed on tree removal,the pond area,and traffic noise. Awada moved, Hunter seconded a motion to approve the Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment changing 10.30 acres located west of Galaxie Avenue and east of Plaza Drive, south of Cliff Road from LB to D-II, subject to Metropolitan Council review; consider the preliminary planned development for 35 zero lot tine single family homes, subject to the following conditions: 1. Execution of the Planned Development Amendment. 2. The term of the Preliminary Planned Development Amendment shall be five years. 3. Final Development Plans shall be submitted which will include the final plat; final grading, drainage and erosion control; final signage; and final landscaping. 4. Two subdivision monument signs located in the northeast and southwest corners of the entire site (per Landscape Plan). 5. The signs shall be subject to a one time $2.50/square foot sign fee at the time of sign permit application. 6. The developer shall be responsible for preparing and recording,with the subdivision,appropriate documents establishing a Homeowners' Association. The documents must be submitted and approved by the City Attorney's office prior to final subdivision approval. Transfers of common areas to the Homeowners'Association shall be recorded with the subdivision. 7. No individual property fences shall be erected or constructed. 8. The common areas shown as outlots will be deeded over to the Homeowners'Association at the time of final plat. • with direction to formally approve this on a future consent agenda along with final adoption of the related comprehensive plan amendment for the area; and consider the preliminary subdivision of 35 lots and 4 outlots, subject to the following conditions 1. The developer shall comply with standard conditions of plat approval At, 81, 82, 84, C1, C2, C3, 01, El, F1, G1 and H1 as adopted by Council on February 3, 1993. 2. The subdivision for OakPointe of Eagan be platted. 3. Lots 1, 13, 21, and 35 shall be labeled as outlots on the final plat. 4. The following notation should be made to the plat: The outlots denoted shall be common area.' Ce EAGAN CITY COUNCIL MINUTES;JULY 11,1995 PAGE 7 5. An individual lot tree preservation plan will be required for Lots 3, 5, 7, 15-39 (excluding Lots 13 and 35, which are streets). 6. Tree protective measures (i.e. 4 foot polyethylene laminate safety netting) shall be installed at the drip line or at the perimeter of the critical root zone,whichever is greater, of the significant trees/woodlands to be preserved. 7. The developer shall contact the City Forestry Division at least five days prior to the issuance of a grading permit to ensure compliance with the approved tree preservation plan. 8. The subdivision shall be subject to a cash water quality dedication. 9. The developer shall abandon the existing sanitary sewer stub from Plaza Drive. 10. The developer shall submit a concept grading plan depicting the possible grading of each lot In the development 11. The development is subject to a cash parks dedication based on single family rates. 12. The development is subject to a cash trails dedication. with direction to formally approve this as a future consent agenda item along with the related comprehensive plan amendment and preliminary planned development. Aye: 5 Nay: 0 REZONING, SOUTHEAST EAGAN After introductions by Mayor Egan and Administrator Hedges, Community Development Director Reichert gave a staff report. Hunter moved, Wachter seconded a motion to approve a rezoning of approximately four acres from I-1 to A, consisting of two separate but adjacent vacant unplatted parcels located east of Highway 3, south and west of Gun Club Road, abutting the Eagan/Rosemount common border. Aye: 5 Nay: 0 PREUMINARY DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND PREUMINARY SUBDIVISION, OPUS CORPORATION/EAGAN PROMENADE After an introduction by Mayor Egan, Administrator Hedges reviewed the project and the process used to get this project to this point. Community Development Director Reichert reviewed the proposal and recommendations from the Central Area Task Force, Planning Commission and Advisory Parks,Recreation and Natural Resources Commission, and indicated that the Council needs to decide the basic land use for the area. Michelle Foster, of Opus Corporation, gave a brief introduction, and Introduced members of the development team and their involvement in the project. Jim Brehl,of Maun&Simon,representing the O'Neil family,thanked the Council, staff and commission members for putting this proposal together and for their attention given to this proposal. He indicated that the O'Neil family is supportive of this proposal and he urged Council approval. Ron Krank, of KKE Architects reviewed the site plan and basic concepts of the plan. He reviewed the pathway and landscape plans and urged Council approval. Tom Healey, of Healey Ramme Company, reviewed the residential component of the plan. Michelle Foster concluded by reviewing the benefits of the project. She noted that this is a quality mixed use development that is comprehensive in scope and will occur within a limited period of time. She added that this development can facilitate meeting some of the city objectives, and enhance the city's tax base. 6 g . Page 3 June 27, 1995 ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION OAKPOINTE OF EAGAN - COMPREHENSIVE GUIDE PLAN AMENDMENT, PRELIMINARY PLANNED DEVELOPMENT, AND PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION - OCP HOMES, INC. Acting Chairman Wallace opened the next public hearing of the evening regarding a Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment changing 10.30 acres from LB Limited Business to D-11 Mixed Residential (0-6 units/acre); a Preliminary Planned Development for 35 single family units, a Preliminary Subdivision (Oakpointe of Eagan) for 35 lots on 10.30 acres located west of Galaxie Avenue, east of Plaza Drive, and south of Cliff Road in the NJV1/4 of Section 32. Planner Tyree introduced this item. Ms. Tyree highlighted the information presented in the City staffs planning report dated June 9, 1995. Ms. Tyree noted the background and history, the existing conditions and the surrounding uses of the subject property. Ms. Tyree addressed the maintenance, landscaping and home styles of the proposed development noting that the same type of housing and neighborhood as is proposed was developed by the applicant in their Oak Cliff Pond first and second phases located south of Cliff Road. Ms. Tyree concluded that the Land Use Guide Plan Amendment appears to be a compatible change in the overall development of the area. Jim Dimond, a representative of the applicant, was present but presented no comment. Member Segal questioned Mr. Dimond on how much space would exist between the sides of the homes proposed. Mr. Dimond stated that it is typically required there be a minimum of 10 feet separation between structures and that the Planned Development proposes that the homes have a front-yard, one side-yard and a rear-yard. Mr. Dimond indicated that if the home was on a zero lot line there would be limited or no existing windows on the zero lot line and that the properties would be held in fee simple ownership by the home purchasers. Mr. Dimond further noted that the developer had met with neighbors and a forester to keep the tree mass around the pond area and place the road cut-in in the tree diseased area resulting in three small clusters of homes through the development. Mr. Dimond noted that the proposed homes in the development would be similar to the Oak Cliff Pond development but would have low maintenance siding instead of wood exteriors. Mr. Dimond stated that the density would be approximately 3.4 homes per acre with an expected price range of$140,000.00 to $200,000.00. Member Isberg asked Mr. Dimond to explain the proposed 30-feet setback for the lots adjacent to Galaxie Avenue. Mr. Dimond described the reason for the 30-foot setback request as being due to the longated shape of the parcel. According to Mr. Dimond, the configuration of the parcel was created by the road pattern serving the adjoining parcels and the varied topography of the parcel itself. Mr. Dimond noted that the parcel is only 210 feet wide and the developer needs to use the open portion of the site for more flexibility. Le c? Page 4 June 27. 1995 ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION A resident who resides at 4713 West Wind Trail stated that although the developer has taken a step in the right direction, he opposes the proposed planned development amendment because it proposes too many homes on substandard lots. The resident expressed concerns involving entrances and exits on to Galaxie Avenue. Specifically, the resident expressed concerns regarding the turn radiuses and emergency vehicles entering and exiting Galaxie Avenue together with construction and realtor traffic during evenings and weekends. Member Burdorf noted the developer had conducted a meeting with the residents. However, this resident stated that he was traveling and was unable to attend the meeting with the developer. Another resident residing at 1834 Karis Way, expressed concerns regarding the _ heavy density of proposed development in the area. Another resident residing at 4728 Ridgewind Trail expressed concerns about entering on Galaxie Avenue and the fact that Galaxie Avenue already gets backed up in the winter. No other individuals from the public presented comment. Mr. Dimond further discussed the proposed access to the development from Galaxie Avenue instead of Plaza Drive. Mr. Dimond explained in detail the historical background of the area surrounding the proposed development and that this area had been planned and zoned for limited business but it developed as a residential area, vehicle traffic in Mr. Dimond's opinion, would be much lower than if limited business continued to develop in the area. Mr. Dimond stated that the northeast woods of the proposed development is unsuitable to provide access from Plaza Drive because there exists 20 degree to 30 degree grades created by the existing road pattern. Mr. Dimond stated that the northeast woods would have to be completely removed and the site raised to provide access to Plaza Drive. Mr. Dimond stated that site lines to Galaxie met visibility requirements and the homeowners had expressed a desire to keep the trees in the northeast woods to function as a screen. Member Carlson stated that the other two cul-de-sacs appear to have fewer trees and questioned Mr. Dimond on whether access to the development on those cul-de-sacs could not occur through Plaza Drive. Mr. Dimond stated that access to these two cul-de- sacs was over a quarter mile from Cliff Road and the traffic generated from the proposed homes in that area would have a minimal impact in the area. Member Carlson questioned Mr. Dimond on the need for zero lot lines as requested in the proposal. Mr. Dimond stated that zero lot lines were attractive to the market and would provide low maintenance homes with no common walls and as a result the homeowners would enjoy more independence. Mr. Dimond characterized these features as an alternative to multi-family housing and again noted that no windows would exist on the zero lot-line side of the home. Member Carlson questioned Mr. Dimond on whether or not a homeowner could walk on the zero lot line side of their home and not be trespassing on the land of another homeowner. Mr. Dimond state that cross easements for maintenance would provide 1.--17 0 Page 5 June 27. 1995 ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION prospective homeowners with all the required access needed on the zero lot lines. Mr. Dimond further stated that the proposed design provides prospective homeowners with one useful side-yard, unlike multi-family housing and the resulting density of the proposed development is much lower than that found in townhome development. Member Isberg asked Mr. Dimond to discuss issues relating to the proposed private streets in the development and Mr. Dimond indicated that the homeowners association would maintain the upkeep and repair of those streets. Member Heyl acknowledged some of the neighbors concerns regarding the development but indicated that she endorses zero lot lines as they provide at least one useable side-yard. Member Heyl further noted that the surrounding area was predominately limited business and that this development would provide good transitional - use of the property. Member Segal inquired of Mr. Dimond to clarify Page 4 of City staffs planning report with respect to the five-foot minimum setback for non-zero side side-yards. Mr. Dimond explained that that proposal deals with pie-shaped lots and that the tips of the garages on those lots may be within five feet of the lot line setback but will always be a minimum of 10 feet from other structures or buildings. Planner Tyree advised that the R-1 single zoning requirement is five feet. Member Segal expressed a desire to amend the proposal to contain a written condition that a minimum of 10 feet exists between buildings. Member Burdorf echoed the thoughts of Member Heyl regarding the use of the property and complimented the developer and Planner Tyree on the proposal. Member Wallace expressed his belief that the proposed development would have a beneficial impact on the preservation of trees. Member Isberg characterized the proposal as a good compromise. Member Segal moved, Heyl seconded, a motion to approve a Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment changing 10.30 acres from LB Limited Business to D-II Mixed Residential (0-6 units/acre). All approved in favor. Member Segal moved, Heyl seconded, a motion to approve a Preliminary Planned Development for 35 single family units, subject to the following conditions: 1. Execution of the Planned Development Amendment. 2. the term of the Preliminary Planned Development Amendment shall be five years. 1 Page 6 June 27. 1995 ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION 3. Final Development Plans shall be submitted which will include the following: *Final Plat *Final Grading, Drainage and Erosion Control *Final Signage *Final Landscaping Sisznage 4.- Two subdivision monument signs located in the NE and SW corners of the entire site (per Landscape Plan). 5. The signs shall be subject to a one time $2.50/square foot sign fee at the time of sign permit application. Homeowners Association 6. The developer shall be responsible for preparing and recording with the subdivision, appropriate documents establishing a Homeowner's Association. The documents must be submitted and approved by the City Attorney's Office prior to final subdivision approval. Transfers of common areas to the Homeowner's Association shall be recorded with the subdivision. Architecture 7. No individual property fences shall be erected or constructed. Lots 8. The common areas shown as outlots will be deeded over to the Homeowner's Association at the time of final plat. 9. All buildings shall be at least ten feet(10') apart. Mr. Dimond asked the Commission to clarify the setback from the lot line or the structure. City Attorney Dougherty indicated that condition could be imposed requiring a minimum 10-foot setback from adjoining structures. Member Wallace moved, Burdorf seconded, a motion to approval the Preliminary Planned Development as amended, to include the setback provision. Page 7 June 27. 1995 • ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION All approved in favor. Member Segal moved, Heyl seconded, a motion to approve a Preliminary Subdivision (Oakpointe of Eagan) for 35 lots on 10.30 acres located west of Galaxie Avenue, east of Plaza Drive, and south of Cliff Road in the NW1/4 of Section 32, subject to the following conditions: Standard Conditions 1. The Developer shall comply with these standard conditions of plat approval as adopted by Council on February 3, 1993; Al, B1, B2, B4, Cl, C2, C3, 131, E 1, Fl, G1 and H1. - C3, however, will be revised to read private streets instead of public streets. Platting 2. The subdivision for Oak Pointe of Eagan be platted. 3. Lots 1, 13, 21 and 35 shall be labeled as outlots on the Final Plat. 4. The following notation should be made to the plat: The outlots denoted shall be common area. Tree Preservation 5. An Individual Lot Tree Preservation Plan will be required for Lots 3, 5, 7, . 15-39 (excluding Lots 13 and 35, which are streets). 6. Tree Protective Measures (i.e. 4 foot polyethylene laminate safety netting) shall be installed at the Drip line or at the perimeter of the Critical Root Zone, whichever is greater, of the significant trees/woodlands to be preserved. 7. The Developer shall contact the City Forestry Division at least five days prior to the issuance of a grading permit to ensure compliance with the approved Tree Preservation Plan. . Water Quality 8. The subdivision shall be subject to a cash water quality dedication. Page 8 June 27, 1995 ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION • Utilities 9. The Developer shall abandon the existing sanitary sewer stub from Plaza Drive. Grading 10. The Developer shall submit a concept grading plan depicting the possible grading of each lot in the development. Parks and Recreation 11. The development is subject to a cash parks dedication based on single family rates. 12. The development is subject to a cash trails dedication. All approved in favor. • PLANNING REPORT CITY OF EAGAN REPORT DATE: June 9, 1995 CASE: 32-RZ--6-5-95 32-PP-6-5-95 32-CP-5-3-95 APPLICANT: OCB Homes Inc. HEARING DATE: June 27, 1995 PROPERTY OWNER: William Soules, PREPARED BY: Shannon Tyree Charles Tatsuda, & Marian Kawakami REQUEST: Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment, Preliminary Planned Development Amendment, Preliminary Subdivision - OakPointe of Eagan LOCATION: West of Galaxie Avenue, east of Plaza Drive and south of Cliff Road in the NW 1/4 of Section 32. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: LB - Limited Business ZONING: Planned Development - Limited Business SUMMARY OF REQUEST OCP Homes, Inc is requesting a Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment changing 10.30 acres from LB - Limited Business to D-II -Mixed Residential (0-6 units/acre); a Preliminary Planned Development Amendment for 35 zero lot line single family homes and a Preliminary Subdivision for 35 lots and four outlots on 10.30 acres located west of Galaxie Avenue and east of Plaza Drive south of Cliff Road in the NW 1/4 of Section 32. AUTHORITY FOR REVIEW City Code Section 13.20 Subd. 6 states that "In the case of platting, the Planning Commission and the Council shall be guided by criteria, including the following, in approving, denying or establishing conditions related thereto:" _ A. That the proposed subdivision does comply with applicable City Code provisions and the Comprehensive Guide Plan. B. That the design or improvement of the proposed subdivision complies with applicable plans of Dakota County, State of Minnesota, or the Metropolitan Council. C. That the physical characteristics of the site including but not limited to, topography, vegetation, susceptibility to erosion and siltation, susceptibility to flooding,water storage, and retention are such that the site is suitable for the type of development or use contemplated. Planning Report - OakPointe of Eagan June 27, 1995 Page 2 D. That the site physically is suitable for the proposed density of the development. E. That the design of the subdivision or the proposed improvements is not likely to cause environmental damage. F. That the design of the subdivision or the type of improvements is not likely to cause health problems. G. That the design of the subdivision or the improvements will not conflict with easements of record or with easements established by judgement of court. H. That completion of the proposed development of the subdivision can be completed in a timely manner so as not to cause an economic burden upon the City for maintenance, repayment of bonds or similar burden. I. That the subdivision has been properly planned for possible solar energy system use within the subdivision or as it relates to adjacent property. (Refer to City Handbook on Solar Access). J. That the design of public improvements for the subdivision is compatible and consistent with the platting or approved preliminary plat on adjacent lands. K. That the subdivision is in compliance with those standards set forth in that certain document entitled "City of Eagan Water Quality Management Plan for the Gun Club Lake Watershed Management Organization" which document is properly approved and filed with the office of the City Clerk hereinafter referred to as the "Water Quality Management Plan". Said document and all of the notations, references and other information contained therein shall have the same force and effect as if fully set down herein and is hereby made a part of this Chapter by reference and incorporated herein as fully as if set forth herein at length. It shall be the responsibility of the City Clerk to maintain the Water Quality Management Plan and make the same available to the public. • planned Development: Chapter 11.20, Subd. 8, B., petermination. states: "In considering any petition for such district, the Planning Commission and the Council in the interests of carrying out the intent and purpose of this Subdivision, shall determine whether or not such planned development will: (1) better adapt itself to its physical and aesthetic setting and that of surrounding lands than does development of the underlying zoning district; (2) be feasible for the owner and developer economically to complete according to proposed plans; (3) benefit the community at large to a greater degree than would development of the underlying zoning district." Planning Report - OakPointe of Eagan June 27, 1995 Page 3 BACKGROUND/HISTORY Planned Development History: The Galaxie Cliff Plaza Planned Development was initially approved in September 1988. The planned_development contained 25.36 acres and allowed Limited Business type uses. The first development completed in the Planned Development was the Burnett Realty office approved in April 1989. Then in October 1990 the Park Nicollet Medical Center building was approved and later constructed. The remaining outlots were platted with the first addition, and have remained vacant. Oakpointe of Eagan History: After reviewing the conceptual development proposal with staff the developer scheduled a neighborhood meeting which was held on March 7, 1995. Approximately a dozen neighboring residents attended the meeting. It was common consensus that the proposed use of the property was more desirable than any type of commercial development. Concerns raised by those attending the meeting were: 1) ensuring that the development would minimize tree loss around the pond; 2) taking access on Galaxie Avenue; 3) future development with the specific lots such as each new homeowner putting up a different style of fence etc... EXISTING CONDITIONS The site is characterized by existing public right-of-way surrounding the entire site. The northern portion of the site has steep slopes. The majority of the trees are located in this area as well as surrounding the pond located in the central portion of the 10.3 acres. The southern portion of the proposed development does not have as severe topography nor as many trees. SURROUNDING USES The following existing uses, zoning, and comprehensive guide plan designations surround the subject property: North - Burnett Realty and Park Nicollet Medical Center; zoned PD ; designated LB. South - Single family residences; zoned PD R-1; designated D-I East - Single family and twin homes; zoned R-2 and R-1; designated D-I West - Burnett Realty and Health Partners; zoned PD; designated LB. EVALUATION OF REOUEST Introduction OCP Homes, Inc. is proposing to develop the same type of housing and neighborhood that was developed in their Oak Cliff Pond first and second phases located south of Cliff Road on Slater Road in the southwest corner of Eagan. The style of development is a zero lot line, cluster development with lots that average 9,500 s.f. on private streets. All of the property owners will belong to a homeowners' association that will provide all of the property maintenance and landscaping; maintenance for common areas,year round street maintenance and trash pickup. The site plan has been designed to accommodate the setbacks required for private streets. The concept of the design is zero lot line development. Each house is designed to be located Planning Report - OakPointe of Eagan June 27, 1995 Page 4 immediately abutting one side of the side property line. Zero lot line design provides a front yard, rear yard and one private side yard per lot. The developer has chosen to orient the lots to maximize southern exposures for either the rear of the home or the "non-zero" (open) side of the homes. These are the most window intensive areas of the homes. Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment The Comprehensive Land Use Guide Plan Map indicates the property is guided LB - Limited Business. The developer is requesting a change from LB to D-11 Mixed Residential (0-6 units per acre). The area abutting this property along the east boundary line is guided D-I Single Family Residential. Changing the Guide Plan to D-II would offer an acceptable transition to the existing D-I neighborhood. Planned Development Amendment The overall density is higher than what the R-1 (single family) zoning district allows, but less than an R-3 (townhome) district permits. As part of the Planned Development the developer can create a development with higher density and smaller lots than in a straight R-1 district. Density The proposed development has a gross density of 3.39 units/acre and a net density of 4.85 units per acre. Lots The smallest lot is 5,749 s.f., the largest lot is 14,591 s.f. and the average lot size is 9,147 s.f. Lots 1, 13, 21, and 35 are common area and need to be shown on the final plat as outlots. Setbacks The property is completely surrounded by road right-of-way (Plaza Drive and Galaxie Avenue), and was designed to maintain a 30' setbacks from the public right-of-way. Normal setbacks from Galaxie Avenue are 50'. The developer is proposing 30', which would affect 11 lots. None of the 11 lots adjacent to Galaxie Avenue have direct access to Galaxie Avenue. According to the developer the reason for the 30' setback along Galaxie is due to the unusually narrow and elongated shape of the parcel. The configuration was created by the road pattern serving the adjoining parcels, the varied topography and the pond in the center of the site. In addition,the 30' setbacks allow greater flexibility in locating the house pads in order to preserve the existing trees. The proposed setbacks area as follows: Front yard: 20' minimum (from private street). Rear yard: 20' minimum for any portion of the dwelling and 10' for decks (except lots 5,6,11,37, and 38 which abut Galaxie and are proposed to have a 30' setback) Side yard - zero lot line - Located on or near the lot line. Side yard - non-zero side - 5' minimum building setback. Planning Report - OakPointe of Eagan June 27, 1995 Page 5 Homes The home styles include ramblers,two stories and multi-level structures in sizes ranging from 1,200 to 2,100 s.f. The exterior finishes are either vinyl or aluminum siding, and metal garage doors. The houses feature color coordinated,narrow lap siding with white trim, 8/12 pitch roofs, trimmed windows on all sides, window grids, 32 panel garage doors, a sidelight at the main entry door, and transom windows at accent points. The developer has approximately six primary building plans that are used as a base. From those variations, custom plans are designed. The typical features include: high or vaulted ceilings, fireplaces, air conditioning, deluxe master suites, transom windows, custom built cabinetry, and ceramic and wood flooring. The price range anticipated is from $140,000 to $200,000. Landscaping The landscape plan as presented is acceptable. Each home will be sodded and provided with an underground sprinkler system. Three trees are also included as well as a front yard rocked shrub bed with a minimum of 6 shrubs. A custom landscape plan is prepared for each lot. Retaining walls, when necessary, are curvilinear, rock face landscape block. Additional perimeter plantings will occur around the site. These will be a mixture of 6' and 8' evergreens. Approximately seven groupings of larger scale shrubs will be mixed with the evergreens. As part of the tree preservation the developer intends to tree spade 40 trees from the site to perimeter locations. Signage The proposed signage plan is acceptable. Two monument signs identifying the "OalcPointe" neighborhood are proposed for the northeast and the southwest corners of.the site. The signs are approximately 11'2" and 2'6" and will be approximately 3'6" above grade. The sign face will be taupe colored with white lettering. Out from the sign in each direction, one section of low,white rail fence will be used for decorative purposes only. The Homeowners Association will assume responsibility for the care and maintenance of the signs. Preliminary Subdivision Tree Preservation The tree preservation plan as submitted is acceptable. The site is approximately 60% wooded with oak, black cherry, aspen and miscellaneous deciduous trees. Pond AP-14 is located in the center of the site where it is surrounded by the above-mentioned trees. Staff has met twice with the developer and their landscape architect to review tree species, location and vigor, and to review past occurrences of oak wilt and Dutch-elm disease on site. A Tree Preservation Plan has been submitted which shows the existence of 206 significant trees. The development plan as proposed will result in the removal of 47 significant trees (22.8% of the total) during the initial phase of development (initial site grading, utilities installation and 7 Planning Report - OakPointe of Eagan June 27, 1995 Page 6 street construction). According to the Tree Preservation Policy, allowable removal for this phase of residential development is 25%. Staff has requested that the developer submit a projection as to the amount of trees which will probably be removed as individual lot development occurs throughout the project. The submitted estimate of second phase tree clearing of significant trees states that 6% of the remaining significant trees are "likely to be removed", and 15%of the remaining significant trees are classified as "uncertain" as to whether they will be preserved or not. Using a worst-case scenario, approximately 21% of the remaining trees following initial phone development will be removed. Allowable removal, according to the Tree Preservation Policy, is 20%. The developer has submitted Tree Preservation-related management activities which will take place on site throughout the development. • Approximately 40 existing individual trees or clumps of trees (primarily oak and aspen) will be tree spaded from areas being graded to areas around the perimeter of the overall site. This should exceed any "Replacement" requirement under the terms of the Eagan Tree Policy. • The home sites on the west side of the pond were redesigned to move the homes approximately 20' further west to preserve additional trees on the pond slope. • The lots in the northern portion of the site were reconfigured and pads adjusted to maintain more of the Aspen grove in the center of the site and to'allow a band of Aspens to run through to Galaxie. • Grading and finishing of the rear of the pads on Lots 13-18 of Block 1 and Lots 1-8 of Block 2 and portions of Lots 1-3 of Block 3 will be delayed until selection of a specific home to allow custom grading and minimize tree loss. • Close to 3 acres of open space is being retained in the center of the property. • Decks and porches will be sated and designed to minimize tree removal when possible. • The street for the northern cul-de-sac is being located enter from Galaxie and to run through the center of an area of dead trees (from oak wilt) which will reduce the impact of the street on areas of healthy trees. It is located close to the natural grade through the middle of the route to minimize the need for grading changes in that area. The design minimizes excess road length to also minimize clearing in the healthy wooded portion of the northern area of the development. FD Planning Report - OakPointe of Eagan June 27, 1995 Page 7 Because tree removal of 22.8% is less than allowable limits, no mitigation for this initial phase of development is required. Grading/Storm Drainage - The majority of this site features mild to rugged topography. The preliminary grading plan as presented is acceptable. The developer plans to grade the proposed streets and entrances and custom grade each individual house site as they develop. The developer shall be required to submit a concept grading plan depicting how each lot may be graded in the future. This concept plan could be used to determine any potential drainage problems with each lot. Grading has been minimized to protect existing forested areas to provide a buffer between the neighborhoods to the south and the medical center property to the north of this development. A large amount of fill material (6 to 12 feet) will be needed to grade the two cul-de-sacs on the west side of the property. With modifications, the storm drainage plan is acceptable and is in accordance with the City Storm Water Management Plan (1990). The development is proposing to connect to the existing storm sewer within the site leading to Pond AP-14. The developer shall be responsible for verifying the capacity of the storm sewer pipes to which they are connecting. Water Quality/Wetlands This development is located in drainage basin A. Runoff from over 90% of the developed site will be discharged to Pond AP-14, a designated sediment trap in the City's water quality management plan. The remaining 10% (mostly backyards) will drain to a storm sewer that discharges to Pond AP-15, another designated sediment trap. The nearest stormwater runoff generated by the development of this site will have a runoff from over 650 acres of residential and commercial land. Because there appear to be other more cost-effective alternatives to improve water quality in Cliff Lake, a cash dedication for this development is required. The only jurisdictional wetland identified within the development site is the wetland complex associated with Pond AP-14. No encroachment into, or drainage of this wetland is proposed for this development. Utilities-Sanitary sewer and water main are available to serve this site from Galaxie Avenue and Plaza Drive. Sanitary sewer and water main stubs are available to serve the western cul-de-sac of the development. Providing service to the remaining two cul-de-sacs will require the removal and replacement of a portion of the Galaxie Avenue road surface. A sanitary sewer and water stub exist in the northeast corner of the development. The sanitary sewer stub cannot be utilized because the elevation of the stub is that which cannot be used by a majority of the site. The developer shall be responsible for abandonment of the pipe at the existing manhole on Plaza Drive. F / Planning Report - OakPointe of Eagan June 27, 1995 Page 8 Access/Street Design - The access and street design plan is acceptable. Previous proposals for this site depicted all access to the site to be taken from Plaza Drive. However, due to steep grades and tree preservation, the eastern two cul-de-sacs are proposed to take access onto Galaxie Avenue. As now proposed, one cul-de-sac street (Ridgecrest Circle) serving seven lots will enter onto Plaza Drive and two cul-de-sac streets (Oakhill Court & Aspenridge Circle) serving 28 lots will enter onto Galaxie Avenue. The current proposal identifies the private streets as lots (Lots 1, 13, and 35). The plans need to be revised to show the private streets as outlots. These outlots will be identified on the plat as common area. The developer has provided City staff with verification that there is sufficient sight distance on the easterly cul-de-sac street (Aspenridge Circle) for a vehicle to access Galaxie Avenue on the curved portion of the roadway based on passenger car turning movement design parameters set forth in the AASHTO Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets (1990). The developer is providing sight distance in excess of the 310 feet required by the AASHTO Policy. Easements/Right-of-Way - The developer shall provide an utility easement of 30 feet for the proposed storm sewer and sanitary sewer lines between lots 9 and 14 of Oakhill Court to insure the required 10 feet of separation between the two lines. Parks and Recreation The proposed development is located in Park Service District 32. RidgeCliff Park is the closest park to serve this development and is located approximately one- half mile from the development site. A cash parks dedication and a cash trails dedication based on a single family development is recommended for this development. Comnatibilitv with Surrounding Area The vacant area to the north located within the same planned development is zoned and guided for Limited Business commercial. The higher density units are a compatible use between the existing single family residential located east of Galaxie Avenue and the commercial west of Plaza Drive. SUMMARY/CONCLUSION The land use guide plan amendment appears to be a compatible change in the overall development of that area. The higher density single family homes are a suitable transititional use between the existing business to the west and the existing low density residential,to the east of the site. The proposed subdivision appears to meet the required findings for subdivsions as identified on pages 1 and 2 of this staff report. Planning Report - OakPointe of Eagan June 27, 1995 Page 9 ACTIONS TO BE CONSIDERED Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment To recommend approval or denial of the requested Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment changing the land use designation from LB - Limited Business to D-II (0-6 units/acre) for the 10.3 acres. Planned Development Amendment To recommend approval or denial of an overall amendment Preliminary Planned Development Amendment for 35 zero lot line housing units subject to the following conditions: 1. Execution of the Planned Development Amendment. 2. The term of the Preliminary Planned Development Amendment shall be five years. 3. Final Development Plans shall be submitted which will include the following: * Final Plat * Final Grading, Drainage and Erosion Control * Final Signage * Final Landscaping Signage 4. Two subdivision monument signs located in the NE and SW corners of the entire site (per Landscape Plan). 5. The signs shall be subject to a one time $2.50/ square foot sign fee at the time of sign permit application. Homeowners Association 6. The developer shall be responsible for preparing and recording, with the subdivision, appropriate documents establishing a Homeowners'Association. The documents must be submitted and approved by the City Attorney's office prior to final subdivision approval. Transfers of common areas to the Homeowners' Association shall be recorded with the subdivision. Architecture 7. No individual property fences shall be erected or constructed. 8. The common areas shown as outlots will be deeded over to the Homeowners'Association at the time of final plat. 3 Planning Report - OakPointe of Eagan June 27, 1995 Page 10 Preliminary Subdivision To recommend approval or denial of the Preliminary Subdivision of 35 lots and four outlots on 10.30 acres. If approval of the subdivision is recommended it shall be subject to the following conditions: standard Conditions 1. The developer shall comply with these standard conditions of plat approval as adopted by Council on February 3, 1993: Al, B1, 82, B4,C1,C2,C3,D1,E1,F1,G1 and Hl. platting 2. The subdivision for OakPointe of Eagan be platted. 3. Lots 1, 13, 21, and 35 shall be labeled as outlots on the Final Plat. 4. The following notation should be made to the plat: The outlots denoted shall be common area. Tree Preservation 5. An Individual Lot Tree Preservation Plan will be required for Lots 3, 5, 7, 15-39 (excluding lots 13 and 35, which are streets): 6. Tree Protective Measures (i.e. 4 foot polyethylene laminate safety netting) shall be installed at the Drip line or at the perimeter of the Critical Root Zone, whichever is greater, of the significant trees/woodlands to be preserved. 7. The developer shall contact the City Forestry Division at least five days prior to the issuance of a grading permit to ensure compliance with the approved Tree Preservation Plan. Water Quality 8. The subdivision shall be subject to a cash water quality dedication Utilities 9. The developer shall abandon the existing sanitary sewer stub from Plaza Drive. Grading 10.. The developer shall submit a concept grading plan depicting the possible grading of each lot in the development. Parks and Recreation 11. The development is subject to a cash parks dedication based on single family rates. 12. The development is subject to a cash trails dedication. • STANDARD CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL A. Financial Obligations 1. This development shall accept its additional financial obligations as defined in the staffs report in accordance with the final plat dimensions and the rates in effect at the time of final plat approval. B. Jasements and Rights-of-Wav, 1. This development shall dedicate 10-foot drainage and utility easements centered over all lot lines and, in addition, where necessary to accommodate existing or proposed utilities for drainage ways within the plat. The development shall dedicate easements of sufficient width and location as determined necessary by engineering standards. 2. This development shall dedicate, provide, or financially guarantee the acquisition costs of drainage, ponding, and utility easements in addition to public street rights-of-way as required by the alignment, depth, and storage capacity of all required public utilities and streets located beyond the boundaries of this plat as necessary to service or accommodate this development. 3. This development shall dedicate all public right-of-way and temporary slope easements for ultimate development of adjacent roadways as required by the appropriate jurisdictional agency. 4. This development shall dedicate adequate drainage and ponding easements to incorporate the required high water elevation plus three (3) feet as necessitated by storm water storage volume requirements. C. Plans and Specifications 1. All public and private streets, drainage systems and utilities necessary to provide service to this development shall be designed and certified by a registered professional engineer in accordance with City adopted codes, engineering standards, guidelines and policies prior to application for final plat approval. 2. A detailed grading, drainage, erosion, and sediment control plan must be prepared in accordance with current City standards prior to final plat approval. 3. This development shall ensure that all dead-end public streets shall have a cul-de-sac constructed in accordance with City engineering standards. • 4. A separate detailed landscape plan shall be submitted overlaid on the proposed grading and utility plan. The financial guarantee for such plan shall be included in the Development Contract and shall not be released until one year after the date of City certified compliance. D. Public Improvements 1. If any improvements are to be installed under a City contract, the appropriate project must be approved by Council action prior to final plat approval. E. permits 1. This development shall be responsible for the acquisition of all regulatory agency permits required by the affected agency prior to final plat approval. F. Parks and Trails Dedication 1. This development shall fulfill its park and trail dedication requirements as recommended by the Advisory Parks, Recreation and Natural Resource Commission and approved by Council action. G. Water Quality Dedication 1. This development shall be responsible for providing a cash dedication, ponding, or a combination thereof in accordance with the criteria identified in the City's Water Quality Management Plan, as recommended by the Advisory Parks, Recreation and Natural Resource Commission and approved by Council action. H. Other 1. All subdivision, zoning and other ordinances affecting this development shall be adhered to, unless specifically granted a variance by Council action. Advisory Planning Commission City Council Approved: August 25. 1987 September 15. 1987 Revised: July 10. 1990 Revised: February 2. 1993 USN STANDARD.CON (P FINANCIAL OBLIGATION - Oak Pointe of Eagan There are pay-off balances of special assessments totaling S78,548 on the parcels proposed for platting. The pay-off balance will be allocated to the lots created by the plat. At this time, there are no pending assessments on the parcel proposed for platting. The estimated financial obligation presented is subject to change based upon areas, dimensions and land uses contained in the final plat. Based upon the study of the financial obligations collected in the past and the uses proposed for the property, the following charges are proposed. The charges are computed using the City's existing fee schedule and connections proposed to be made to the City's utility system based on the submitted plans. Improvement Use Rate Quantity Amount Storm Sewer Trunk R3 5.02/sq ft 320,139 sq ft $6.403, Total 1§4 • v u r 1 \v.... •ze. w �y 1 .4 � t � :11: � ! Ip_ AN 7 iII0[[ wOOD anE . IACOrrtr 1RK I I•♦A.A.yI�O_o ra�..yna t r ,J , 1 PK ' rr 1 unmet 1.4. TA.r fr T Y s � C 1 va r 4 f O 11011W . P '� { y ' GI• 1 Q t+F 1♦, 1 • I CORAL LA,°SI CT. --• T I/77 I 7rinujr . .y � YR g ,...0.L 1II AR RA ' I t ., C:),, i lg.4 �. .. . F.X p ` ® 43 .gI) , " . , 1 ' '��9 PARK i A -. - :: ' 0 - 4 . . 1., f W 46 a, , RK 11` `. PARK•• t g :. , ,op r� 8!e, '�' r 111 ROAD I: lik?RD-'k In .., ..,.. . A 1 i Ai.... � lY 4: air LAKE s �.•. r is:4 u /- —` - pC _ T NOKIA 1�1(1A I WAY�J�! G77(7 RAIN WAY w �i CT. wAY .1 1 / ik i MANLY 4,.. r 41:9 N� �' i gr t).4 I. tx ' PIII P 1/ r 1 4 f N. �• < • La ' . .fit mow . . .y f � kt. ..�PA O� .1 ' � 7w ' ■ _w• a _t0105 RO. A (r .r---ar.'!� � : RpCECLPF' ARK 1 u / ' + so _ _ 1 s-AMC PT. KO.16.41066.oswc R. .+ 0 u •, ..•.�q���ij fY / M TwM H. I$- IJI FTR. y • y,• 1"4"R. IIt/NIAR. Y '� CT.b.1 A tre t I,ywtwtPT R. IS,Is7w R. T�+a M I{yt,.IT. IM 111I11�1 R.., 11-4tp.�.R. 74:StAYTJN R.rA*ow K >14-A1.Iw M. _ Ail zi '01'---- -,1 APPLE VALLEY LOCATION 7p • .01111117///// RANN -r� i • II►�i 410.• ,:......:,4i_ i.r DT „ '( .7-7/ / 1 i III ' . 1'+ "�;-,.. "��► a..v rte/ A M ►.:..� j' . ! 1'Ciiim k I !• __ �:i II�V: . .fir ,: r77- *7.--m-tilrr_-_-4.:0 *r .- 13 110%1311/0.10-- - 7., ■ lit f•l3� ..` /r�\'V..11'...” • �.:r� ' rte _a PD-LB (Planned Development- ���iiii '' t •`�' —1-,..--r R' _ .U'4.:' , om- Limited Business) � ....,,y:::?):14:0111r ° _��/ __ : 5'-�._a :. - .rte tirF.„5,, l r,,,, 1/ Neu_.=.!......\-`----� J3 ,a��iti,..-1■,x,64 ��..+.., -� 1��(�"-- �, ' " g ....^: /,>. •-• ..;),/ 7 i I) L' GB $ • 7 k: , • r ■ CSC P • 1 0 • COMPREHENSIVE GUIDE PLAN c.� ' • CPO PF 0.1 LB (Limited Business) NB L8 °_ \ i; 1.0 "elf 41H) . / . ; i r RB ' 0•1 • PF 04v L�. o-w 1 P111!1: ' Y°F ' ^ — _ � , ~ ^ / / 1 / � i N����� ~/ • m.....-%....1_,-:Est.aw.., / atit - ---..,, . ....*".. -441/14, 1--- . L _ _ II /,. 1‘, ei . I\01 V / figgifilp 401 \N ) ' A n r ___,.. , ‘ ....._........ ... // \ ....... II \\ 10,0 -----...._, ......_..... __, _...... , 0.. , , N . ..... .........„ .„.\ , . . . __ _ \s„. \ i.„, > ______-- \ ,_.... , , <- .•SID.•■=4/4 W.lo.1,•au, . R[(Tk1 /` " ^ - --' ' -- -- ---------- ---------- • ~ _.7--' .__ F i ./7./r79 1 I I III- * - ' ' 1#-:: -=' :7.-_- V. 4,:-1-1., ,,, ; r . _ . , .. „,. .,...w....c.,. ..\ .. . ,6.,f / , . f. .. . ......„:„.......... ....?..,..........„...c.... re ,•' 1 '" • i 1 ' .. r{,-• . /,_ ',. J..t....--V I it,„.... _1••.....!..00.) ‘ „_,74.\.V 4,0„00,... .........._.. .,:,......,.......„..:,...::„., , ........•........„0. ,.... Ilioier.tsvc f //, // k firsqlir ,<>/y1 41 ,/,,,/ 1\\\41:\s‘‘ 01---/,//,':1 1 .' i //jillij,',//1//i .-.1),,n'rks.'.301,■' ;.-„ ".7' ;X 1 \ ..\,‘ • ii,, ••- _,..4..... , , Aillt74 •-•- WAII .11111111;4111°. few ma `,, _� ldC�� 'r'� I ^ \ �j, •• . ICI, t...f_ -_ " --wig/ el .� vs . ill i. gle:" 1141%--1.-3-- "f".' 4 " I =a__.—..-�.. •,•r w M _. -+.� / /• ���,� % mil{ II F.i3Li1RiZL�LSiL�� .� t ?: mi.Wpm pi m .' ' s/,rtiz41 41.ek' - .I ...—.....................ku,a- __ .•.===-:::: 4 -3 .(41c , _ , .....t. ... -.._ -....- - n111111 ,,, , ,, . , A.-„v- .- ,t. , /,,,,,,-* .1 i t ..,!...7- .,._._ M M M i Ajv/ f. \ ! / , , I ' -:-.- .... . i..elts •- ,n,igri :in`■ j.ii r• I / . PUMP / �� mss- =rig i\ �l '' -.. ,--- AZ*I ;' de Nk.! /,•.7,",r, .� r i�� .1 46 11 4 0 ' •� "�„� �r• /'l it � •- "�``per —'._✓r,y,! / \ ... ` ..,., ......�..... Li a.rr lar, .7.. '••v■� r 1=.ir—s_r. Y <r .''••• —. •/-'IayMMlr WOW OO NPRi NG - m• =2..:.:.:... • «• :3:• r. •-• ...■-41 -.1•■1 ..... s,/e_ .,. , . , , ..-,„ ......„, . III . 4'....' 741;:. 1.' 7 II- ' 4/44:\\.-:” ',. ! I. Mir , tle,',0""-11---1.1 j:;- .,,,,,.-,.: . tio .:I larr.Ls■61 I .*:\''-;;;T:1 o - : .. , b . f /_ ,% ma , "NONIES ,(i2.:0.."--::-..•,4..41.0•04.'-......--'..1114k4j1INt " I / iiiii-06-, I rtoi-A40) --- 1 :- ,w,„.• ..,.„ . ,..,it ,..lc:iii ill" %,., • , , 0„ . 401.,A, \ l'''' ' A I ..)401r,tikt 0Via\WZ), " -"..:-:. ,..;",,,;...;"..., \ ..,.. 411 711. --""' ._,...........btiffe- 4004-1 .' \\ •C j.��;a`. ss_.•c.- -,,i,.. - eor Nana NC `•O•Aa1R or MO, • � �_ __ ^�►;- „ :: L , N., , III,Iti- .-"..:—_- ." . - -4.- I r. .k�: r -_...._ - _ - — ,/�' ;!%�i.�/ rir I III• _ ss r_�ss�r� .. .�,_.. /'.// 0 \ ,I III ;�.__._ �_..._ :rte /,d /'� •��. I I r�SUBDIVISION ` * I I III litiagaiElAN.n®= HOME PLANTINGS �. /• I� '•� _..,0_ I _ .I .,,....c- we e < .; ; ,- - �.. z-r__ .m --- fir- 4�R !�,i��' i;�;_�� �► )j-s.tr 4,h,‘..f.Alt#,."1 - -.4.-4' AO • ik' • ;•. ',al. - 'II R;77 El 1,1_,...1._,-;› v"iitstiv . c ' . - ,, :1 •,-rfa, Valli /: - E nr-- ii / ■•-IMP Illa-11-- -- to -1 'I•10r41 :1: /.' '-==.--- ,,,,,,N, ........., .„z,„*„..A. ......• „. .. ...c. .,„ •,, .....=......___, ,,,,, ,............ , , y, • , , 4- (00 Ar'114evetiii. riPli s elVA. \ - t, -...,r7A, , ,ii -).r. 1;11' . 1-1,421trt4i-3 le.444:74:ticobit,„ '''ss.. ...• - `i.:!,."4.., i 44141,,,,'%.., 4. . .4, ,,,,./7; ,i,/.p illk`v. • Wit —.� -._1 . --_ -ro. ii.. .\ > / \ •�-7ITIF:»1.746.31.72-7:71-3E-::::4-.- S. rl..idM` MItw+Mtr wcsc KM 1•••• M ,� ov carts,uc �-.,*want a O&M �.•• s � s . OAKPOINTE EAGAN MN SIGN SPECIFICATION SCALE "s)1 d" 5- P-45 ..PLC.= I i . Sj. ,- 1 gad kjTOn te AO $ X- . ti �''ZED74FC:-REVERE F_ KQL TED-' vIF#T1T=L_ ____ via=:rsryast-m.E c cr- • - i F • iKAVra-LF'L.1--- j i . _ELM . IDAj. •. x. _ ,uki H ; 1 1 . b s A ' )AKT26i .. .._________________ I�, 0 1 1 . p 1 . . 1 I . 1 , 1 .� is H 203 CEDAR_, _ALL _WR ITE - 4x6 CEDAR -$, ___ . _ is 1 AUXILIARY FENCE UNIT- EL:EVAT 1 O OAKPOINTE OF EAGAN ._ oC Warcvl ARCo'vITAE-3' C; I Kt 1140241.w,iu..mioerie-I `F•6 6C tbaraam nG x/Z6C1�`" AI IA jonteeL-! ( g \ . 11.....1 _ LIInt-rR-, 6PIRFA• 4, c-.) er. Mea.%kis&w.f..•toee.(0 , \ - 1 i SAMPLE NOME LANDSCAPE PLAN . Each home landscape plan varies and is customized for the site. All yards are sodded and have underground sprinklers. Each home landscape includes: 1- 2 1/2" Deciduous tree 1- 6' Evergreen tree 1- 1 1/2" Ornamental tree 6- Shrubs an edged rock bed in front !mot' "'CII, i11 "III reviit.4.-Irouti 7.-11 •.i :I nay�-� D :• �/%, C ut i 1-�el g N■ , .gift rn a k., 11111 1111 ye t i AA 33 Ali —.,.-- . A :B170-t 141tVI irkr 4;--it% M0 0 6. .4,-_,a ., 7'6 $ 6,--a.11ri 1 C) Z � i , , 4 i A" : '! It 4 a fi . 1 cq ;t�� _ o- AI!' ryr O i .=;∎r��'j .4,*t f r 1 mil VI Rl ° N 1 g•• ;1:M r I o a4 0 P2 • a 4 Ji et.. -�L—l.i .n, ,.i.„ rn CA c ,l4 4 Lz T D _ =...., : ...k...4.,Itolt,\,.!.J914-Anr4. :0 -< . ,..., /� f 6th ° ? s ue Ti XJ 0 %LI, V4P- 4,0,1 414 II: r �y , sr. may ; _maw' � 5 € �� • . ir-lit c r✓ '' yam— " _ > G 1 e \ •.•- iii WWI m �- b•~ - rrfi► '' ti:J.t-ti-', 111 "IP �� •' _ :_ � `tip o l / I OA VY, ;4.4',„'Ai i -F.:7 - If-4 . . . . . .1 US .17;:sf-a-az- -- ....... _...., _Ilk :- . 4 . . . . . . . _ , _214 . . . . . . . • • . . . . . , i I 13i=4„..., p. : 7.. • . . . . . . ,?,_ ., aro% iv , ,._;.,... {5t,. LI - • . . . . . . a, to Ico ri - it,....-a. -.' , I- if i - - - r - 7 Z .......• 'S—Ept----- .11 1.1H...i.,;J r 42. _1 ,___ .. . 12ill "1 F- .,..,, __ .T0.4 /...(1.1w. j it IL el?•I I.6:( FkS' 4 I .•. i: hici -F..z.f.• - .'f-1-!rr.tt, .. .) ul D 0 ..I''Ati-ka 1., L 4 r,. -. . -I-r.:4424... .-.. ., - • ;...,4 ..;-.1;i .ft A• , .,, .. i.- -J - - -t. rod:: % ;11; :,17‘T.,.i • , ' -- ..'. :it 1:1_.1 li.ict:;.;.;FAT • N.., ® cc D t tv a_ t.:-,.,,,,,,,,,,,_,... t % N•CC Z 7- ',''Ivir .0,,7'■ OCC° try< .r .. ) Z W ›•• Vi 4) I ''.. 7C.1- 1--.-'• \.411.,-1 r•n53,11i Vi.d.ii —.IR . L „, ..t .,viz . 0„ 6 1,, 4 • .4...IN, • -', v . I ;lel lie . 71.r..., .• (0 • ■IIIIIM i L ta I :x I :IA- .I .JIIIIT s • A .,. •.. • . . 1 - .,a4:41- , .. • 2 e, ip nLii,,, IP rijrr-iga.it... lei?:\.\\., 4:::, i;...,tu.17_ 0 IX, .x& CC - 7 DJ- t:i „. - i E g.,..„ . '--• ...p. ._ ti,... c • f-4,;:„, 1- •.•: i --:-.■''"-."-- . ...c 0.•.- =-_ Z • r-1-_-':,:ausi 4-.4jr- s.„- "-tw --===., < • IA ---- . • I • ...-•-- x ,/ • IS 1 -11111LIMOL f • i•I!. •.:. i . I MITirmy ..... / • t 1 • . :m ,..;,......1 r."-Wer : 'UM12 / '...i:....;:i4V„••-: f..:„:...• WE.i It i / ,, .1'•... .••••'.: '.'•''.`7.•4 i .• `ra.1.1..-"AS:.•...--r-nts'Ar ;;;;";ti r.4.................• 4::•::-..::4;#;•••:::• ''.." ::t• _ / i .....'..:.?. ..i.." 0 . . LrALTZ•Tint.i.a. 424. ..... .. / "'"'' '''F.1,•!'::• • I glra"53 32--'"../ilalr ' .... .x.r• -••••—•- . Irts.-",-MI=.1•.-•••••••••••••• VOW / - / • .'''.....'•::::%**A.'' . /...:4;•.';..:7. L _ _ FINANCIAL OEUGATION es?' .1....iii.......:, - .v.-:.......:).f':.,:t .•er LEGEND ./ ..: .....31/0',. .•::f • • .. .e* -. -- 4 r .=?rrf.V....:::::.."'-'114..". 1 -‘1' • ' 1 :••••••::::::*::* / • . :!:iiiiiiiiiiiiiii 'Ai.''''''::-..."'••':■• 31 .....::•:: :::::::::%* MOM Swot Truk , t:::1;P'" •k::: '.. .),.. . , p, ::y ::: ../ • •■■•• ii:.':•• :':;:::.:Kii: • : .... :• I- . I It!' :tihri.i.;7 / ■ ---- / c, •-■,-....,--- . -,:•37#:. .5:.-. .1 . ;Y .... eil . --- 1 g'•:•"•::*. '%•.*, / ..e•• .4t•.*. ,4 I • /..-....-----.....—---- a •...I:if..., •.."..,:,...t. IN t . / ....: -,...•„...14..... .......0.;7:::.., .4 •......‹..:.??....•'447`..... ..-..::../.'."....:...":S \ / • ....".:7 ................ :...14..% . .' )...'4:::.; A vz.:: r"" - 14.4:::,./- r/ . ....41 :...-....;4 ..:7:0. 1-:....::•••'.•••.'. ..1,3. 5..:'•..;.:.4,11.•.: t .*, ' % t.... ....:':'f .... t••;', / • '1■•• •I'•.A.*.. "... ..•:'."....4!',A.- v.. . - .. . . . . . / ..--- ..: ,44,y.--.•...,.,. • -....0..:... ........._,....... ,.• - • tftt, . \ '........:A;-.-t::.;...,..:,,......--- ..... ( I . N • :-..:-..,".,,,,...., - .......... --...,...., . ..... . . ,-- \ 11.1••••..,•I•MN AM •'4..;' > 1PP . ....,,,:_....1.2-.........„. ........,.:._,_.... , <.,:. ..• ,...:4.......„, 1 , _. . ---L ,........ ....... - . ino. ..4...„.,,i1„...............= ....„. .., ..- ,....___ _ _ ... ...... Agenda Information Memo September 5, 1995 Eagan City Council Meeting J(EOUEST TO RECONSIDER PRELIMINARY PLANNED DEVELOPMENT & PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION CONDITIONS - SOLDERHOLM ADDITION. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: 1. To approve or deny the removal of Condition # 13 of the Preliminary Subdivision. 2. To approve or deny the proposed change in Condition #3 of the Preliminary Planned Development. FACTS: • Preliminary Subdivision Condition No. 13 states: "A right-out egress be granted directly onto Diffley Road east of Lexington Way by Dakota County. • The Dakota County Board denied a variance request by the developer and the City to permit a right-out onto CSAH NO. 30. The Plat Commission felt that the best policy for safety is the least amount of access and that the right-in on CSAH NO. 30 is already a severe departure from the County's guidelines. ISSUES: • The developers are requesting that the Preliminary Subdivision and Preliminary Planned Development be approved with the right-in only from CSAH NO. 30 and that Condition No. 13 be removed. • Additionally,they are requesting approval of the Preliminary Planned Development with Condition#3 stating: "the 10,800 s.f. retail shopping center shall precede the development of the Holiday Station Store" be changed to state that "the 10,800 s. f. retail center shall be developed concurrently with the Holiday Station Store." BACKGROUND/ATTACHMENTS: (2) Letter from Dakolpsunty Plat Commission (August 21, 1995) - page 9 7 . Site Plan - page DAKOTA COUNTY GARY H.STEVENSON,R.LS. COUNTY SURVEYOR LAND INFORMATION DIRECTOR (612)891-7087 SURVEY&LAND INFORMATION DEPARTMENT FAX(612)891-7031 r01A Co& 14955 GALAXIE AVENUE APPLE VALLEY MINNESOTA 55124-8579 4'NNESO August 21, 1995 City of Eagan ...t... 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55112 ATT: Thomas L. Hedges, City Administrator SODERHOLM ADDITION Dear Mr. Hedges, The Dakota County Plat Commission met on August 7, 1995, to reconsider the variance request for the plat of SODERHOLM ADDITION. Said plat is adjacent to CSAH NO. 30 and CO. RD. NO. 43 and is, therefore, subject to the Dakota County Contiguous Plat Ordinance. The Plat Commission considered the letter dated August 18, 1995, concerning a variance to the previously approved right-in only access to CSAH NO. 30. This right-in only access is a variance from the County's spacing guidelines and was negotiated as part of the right of way purchase on Project No. 30-06 as identified in the Stipulation for Settlement dated December 1, 1993. The Plat Commission feels the best policy for safety is the least amount of accesses. The right-in only is already a severe departure from the County's guidelines. Therefore, the Plat Commission does not recommend approval of the variance request for a right out onto CSAH NO. 30. The project has adequate access to CSAH NO. 30 from Lexington Way for west bound traffic. Since ely, r ary H. Stevenson Dakota County Surveyor & Land Information Director Secretary, Plat Commission GHS/vf CC: Shannon Tyree, Planner Tom Colbert, Public Works Director Peggy Reichert, Director of Community Development Bolton & Menk - E41)4 ' : w 7 Printed on Recycled Paper Be ,„ , ,solution! AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER sir III , s • 'fix d $ - i 11 11 .....-. I I I I 1 I t.'f•rii Timm rx_ I li ' tr#EF ilfit 1 1 la t ar""757111 i ;! I[IiJJ " 1 I - ,4= ' 1 ; \ ogi f i ,ll' rt _ 1 H , . , ili ! Iw,1 : Z I = i I 7/ iQ `_ r I ss: [1- d‘i 4 11171.0WOOM i / r w ��r'j iii r I f i°i i 11M 1f Ili" . :g g s is i{ E d E ++ " `3,+ItIr r sic,. Agenda Information Memo September 5, 1995 NEW BI:ItiNtS A. CONTRACT 95-12,DEERWOOD RESERVOIR ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: To authorize an addendum to the bid solicitation for Contract 95-12(Deerwood Reservoir)to request bid quotations for the installation of a City logo. FACTS: • On August 15, the City Council authorized staff to advertise for competitive bids for the construction of a 4.0 MG reservoir to be constructed on the Frances Franz parcel located south of Deerwood Drive and east of I-35E. The City Council is scheduled to consider these bids at the September 20 Council meeting. • The City staff has prepared various alternative logo and name alternatives that can be painted on this reservoir. In order to get competitive bid solicitation, the City Council must authorize an addendum to the bid specification document previously approved. ISSUES: • Various water reservoirs necessary to maintain pressure and reserve water supply for the City's water system have been strategically situated at the highest elevations within the community. The proposed location for the Deerwood Reservoir will be visible to almost all locations within the City of Eagan as well as to the estimated 50,000 vehicles that travel 35-E on a daily basis. While this 90'tall and 92'diameter structure by itself will be visually intrusive to the skyline, it provides an opportunity for the City of Eagan to provide local community identification. The Council should decide to what extent it would like the City's identification/image/logo on the structure. • Presently, only the City's name(EAGAN)is imprinted on the Safari Reservoir(Cedar Freeway and 35-E)and the Sperry Reservoir(Pilot Knob and Towerview Road). The Lexington Reservoir was originally proposed to have a more unique architectural park amenity facade installed in lieu of a logo. The Yankee Doodle and Cliff Road Reservoirs have not had discussion regarding the painting of the City logo to date. ATTACHMENTS: • Three alternative logo/name designs, pages 00 /�-• • Photo of existing Safari Reservoir showing logo and cellular antenna installations is enclosed under separate cover. G6'k 1.` • city oF cagan . . .1. .„1. A, ,. • ., I " •••■ • • 1, : ' ' 7- • 411P111)AGAN • �z• k.: k .4' •r • •1 1' i;r', Irr'.t rr.Ir•� .'1'1 AV I•(1' r'•�i., i r•�1 . !" o 1 k - EAGAN 4, 0\1 s yot • tr• rise•■ •.• .1 IV I 7■■■•of•1,7 •• •jr • • '" •• :I on • Agenda Information Memo September 5, 1995 Eagan City Council Meeting B. CERTIFICATION OF PROPOSED 1996 PROPERTY TAX LEVY AND PROPOSED 1996 BUDGET; SET TRUTH IN TAXATION HEARING DATES ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: To authorize the certification of the proposed 1996 property tax levy, approve the preliminary 1996 general fund budget and set the initial Truth in Taxation hearing for December 5, 1995, and the continuation hearing for December 13, 1995. FACTS: • A special work session was held on August 29, 1995, to review the proposed 1996 property tax levy, the preliminary 1996 general fund budget and truth in taxation requirements. Enclosed is a copy of the preliminary departmental 1996 budget as reviewed at the special meeting. • The preliminary 1996 general fund budget is$15,052,400 and the proposed 1996 property tax levy is $12,630,893. ■ The levy will be used by the County for Truth in Taxation notices to be mailed in November. ■ Both the levy and budget will continue to be reviewed prior to final adoption in December. • The property tax levy can be decreased but cannot be increased while the budget can continue to be adjusted. ATTACHMENTS: Preliminary departmental 1996 budget, page 0 . 103 5 IP 4x!4!444 444 4x44 4X4 4 $ x ��o sa�� �a �le� a �0 0 ,.....N$N ....... .I* V!N ... N 0 in 000 - a Ei O : IH a N M . gr. a in m a a a 0 « « O/ 0 W E g, sank s �NBa. 11:v4).s p § �� OO�i�aD�N m !70 �f Nf 4 1.1 « « s Z d g sssssss s 's p SmHER2 Iii. age, ERN Q r s so , N Pag ai V, 1 E.§.1.§-E.9 1 I.gl El!f: 1 a 1 1 .. off — a .- aee^^rro bvo apfppp �jao O�prw � 3C0 4, 41, , e;i §f�01l7 Iffy inr Ol5fp f g - 2 sfraRE'Nl4 �o� EIEE E Q « r •i .t a e" M I d ._ O o m:4g O KO r PO ry V 0 Owg:Mp 'a Mr- AOg§ 0N §r . .,..... f7 f0 Pf I-1� a7 .r ti M • I 4fi fq 1 i /ill! gLi I ! Li' wt s. 40 MIMI 011 ail 111 i 11 ili 0000s0e E- 18 NNN f)fC 2 - S; G i s /0 Agenda Information Memo September 5, 1995 Eagan City Council Meeting C. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - ADAMS OUTDOOR ADVERTISING ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: To approve or deny a Conditional Use Permit to allow an off-premise sign on Soo Line right-of- way located south of 1-494, west of Hwy. 55. To approve or deny an amendment to Table A of the Sign Code (Section 4.20). FACTS: • Adams Outdoor Advertising proposes to construct a single-faced, 480 s.f. (10'x 48') sign. ' The sign will be mounted on a single steel pole, with the top of the sign 40 feet above grade. The sign will be located on Soo Line right-of-way that is presently inactive and closed to train use. The sign will be located to meet the required 10 foot setbacks. • The sign meets the spacing requirement of 1500 lineal feet from another off-premise advertising sign. It is about 1800 l.f. east of an existing advertising sign along the south side of 1-494 (sign # 14 on Table A). • The Advisory Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on this requested Conditional Use Permit at its regular meeting on August 22, 1995. The Commission recommends approval of the Conditional Use Permit subject to conditions. ISSUES: • The Commission raised concerns about the ability to "bank" sign faces and area, since this request will only utilize one sign face and less sign area than previously approved. It is staffs understanding that the "banked" area and/or faces could be transferred to another location as long as the overall number of signs, area and faces is not increased from that originally approved on Table A. The remnant sign area or faces would be "banked" to the company initially granted each sign. • Two versions of a revised Table A are attached for consideration and adoption. One reflects both the Adams proposal and the recently approved sign for Naegele. The other only reflects the approved Naegele sign. Table A was not amended following approval of the Naegele CUP in June. It should be amended at this time to include all approved off-premise advertising signs to date. 0 s BACKGROUND/ATTACHMENTS: (4) APC minutes of August 1/4. '/� Revised Table A (two versions). P, 0 Page 10 August 22, 1995 ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION ADAMS OUTDOOR STORAGE - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT Member Miller opened the next public hearing of the evening regarding a Conditional Use Permit to allow an off-premise pylon advertising sign on Soo Line right- of-way located south of I-494, west of Highway 55, in the NE'/4 of Section 3. Planner Farnham introduced this item. Ms. Farnham highlighted the information presented in the City staffs planning report dated August 10, 1995. Ms. Farnham noted the background and history of the Eagan sign ordinance, the existing conditions, surrounding uses and the use capability of the subject property. Ms. Farnham specifically noted that because the applicant never erected a sign under its 1993 Conditional Use Permit, the applicant is technically not requesting to relocate the approved sign but to utilize the approved sign area and erect a one-sided sign at a new location. Ms. Farnham further noted that the proposed sign meets the criteria for off-premise signs. A representative of the applicant stated that he concurs with the staff report and noted that in 1993 the applicant had three pending applications for off-premise signs and was granted one sign. Member Segal inquired as to whether the applicant may "bank" a second sign with a single face because Table A allows applicant to have a two-face sign and the present proposal is that for a single-face sign. Planner Farnham advised that only 20 square feet would be left over from the original sign which would not be sufficient for a second sign. City Attorney Dougherty added that the ordinance allows only 14 signs and the applicant's proposed one-sided sign would be the fourteenth sign and thus would not be permitted to have an additional sign. Member Heyl moved, Member Carlson seconded, a motion to recommend approval of a Conditional Use Permit to allow an off-premise pylon advertising sign on Soo Line right-of-way located south of I-494, west of Highway 55, in the NE1/4 of Section 3, subject to the following conditions: 1. The Conditional Use Permit shall be recorded at Dakota County within 60 days of Council approval with documentation provided to the City. 2. Applicant shall submit a detailed site plan illustrating the sign location, including setbacks, drawn to scale prior to issuance of a sign permit. 3. The sign will be subject to the one-time sign fee of$2.50/sq.ft. 4. All applicable City Codes. All approved in favor. 1 07 PLANNING REPORT CITY OF EAGAN REPORT DATE: August 10, 1995 CASE: # 3-CU-15-6-95 APPLICANT: Adams Outdoor Advertising HEARING DATE:August 22, 1995 PROPERTY OWNER: Soo Line Railroad PREPARED BY: Julie Farnham REQUEST: Conditional use permit for off-premise sign LOCATION: South side of I-494 west of Highway 55 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: Industrial (IND) ZONING: Light Industrial (1-1) SUMMARY OF REOUEST Adams Outdoor Advertising is requesting a Conditional Use Permit to allow an off-premise advertising sign located south of I-494, west of Hwy 55, on Soo Line Railroad property in the NE 1/4 of Section 3. They are proposing to utilize, or "relocate" the sign square footage permitted per Table "A" of the sign ordinance for a previously approved sign at I-35E south of Diffley Road which was never erected. AUTHORITY FOR REVIEW City Code Chapter 11, Section 11.40, Subd. 4, C states: The Planning Commission shall recommend a conditional use permit and the Council shall issue such conditional use permits only if it finds that such use at the proposed location: A. Will not be detrimental to or endanger the public health, safety,or general welfare of the neighborhood or the City. B. Will be harmonious with the general and applicable specific objectives of the Comprehensive Plan and City Code provisions. C. Will be designed, constructed, operated and maintained so as to be compatible in appearance with the existing or intended character of the general vicinity and will not change the essential character of that area, nor substantially diminish or impair property values within the neighborhood. ( 0? Planning Report - Adams Outdoor Advertising August 22, 1995 Page 2 D. Will be served adequately by essential public facilities and services, including streets, police and fire protection, drainage structures, refuse disposal, water and sewer systems and schools. E. Will not involve uses, activities, processes, materials, equipment and conditions of operation that will be hazardous or detrimental to any persons, property or the general welfare because of excessive production of traffic, noise, smoke, fumes, glare or odors. F. Will have vehicular ingress and egress to the property which does not create traffic congestion or interfere with traffic on surrounding public streets. G. Will not result in the destruction, loss or damage of a natural, scenic or historic feature of major importance. City Code Chapter 11, Section 11.40, Subd. 4, I. Expiration states: "In any case where a conditional use permit has not been established within one year of the date on which the conditional use permit was granted, the permit shall be null and void." Off-Premise Signs City Code Chapter 4, Section 4.20 Subd. 4, B states that "The owner of an existing off-premise sign may construct a new off-premise sign pursuant to a conditional use permit issued in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 11 of the City Code, and under the following criteria." 1. No sign will be permitted which increases the number of signs beyond the number of signs depicted in Table A, as amended from time to time. 2. No sign shall be permitted which increases the total square footage of all signs beyond the number of total square feet depicted in Table A, as amended from time to time. 3. No sign shall be permitted which increases the total number of sign surfaces beyond the total number of sign surfaces depicted in Table A, as amended from time to time. 4. The maximum square footage of a sign shall be 250 square feet; however, the City may allow a sign in excess of 250 square feet upon (i) the reduction of the total number of signs, square footage or surface areas depicted in Table A, as amended from time to time, and (ii) amendment to said Table A to reflect such reduction, and (iii) further so long as the total square footage of all signs is not increased beyond the total of sign square footage depicted in said Table A, at the time of application for a new sign. V Planning Report - Adams Outdoor Advertising August 22, 1995 Page 3 5. No sign shall be located nearer to any other off-premise sign than 1,500 lineal feet on the same side of the street or 300 lineal feet on the opposite side of the street. 6. No sign shall be located on a platted lot which contains a business sign. 7. No sign shall be located within 300 feet of any free-standing ground sign or pylon sign. 8. No sign shall be located within 200 feet of any residentially zoned district. 9. No sign or any part thereof shall exceed 40 feet in height as measured from the land adjacent to the base of the sign. BACKGROUND/HISTORY In May 1993 the City Council approved a CUP for Adams Outdoor Advertising for a 500 square foot, two-sided sign to be located at 1-3 SE, south of Diffley Road. The CUP was given a 5 year term limit to allow future reconsideration and review of the sign. At the same meeting, the Council passed a motion to adopt the current sign ordinance that includes a no net gain policy with regard to off-premise signs. Table A of the ordinance specifies the location, square footage and number of sign surfaces permitted in the City. The Adams sign was added to Table A in the motion to approve the sign ordinance amendment. Adams never erected the sign and the CUP, which was never recorded, expired. Adams is now proposing to relocate the sign area permitted for sign #11 on Table A to property owned by the Soo Line Railroad along the south side of I-494, west of Hwy 55 abutting the Eagandale Office Park. EXISTING CONDITIONS The property is flat and covered with mixed weeds and grasses. Some overstory trees exist along the property line abutting the parking lot for the Ergotron building. The property is part of a railroad corridor. This segment north of Eagandale Boulevard where the sign will be located, is not currently in use by the railroad. Overhead power lines run along the south side of Hwy 55 adjacent to the railroad right-of-way. SURROUNDING USES The following existing uses, zoning, and comprehensive guide plan designations surround the subject property: North - I-494; Mendota Heights South - Eagandale Office Park; zoned and guided Industrial. East - Hwy 55, I-494/1-35E interchange. West - Eagandale Office Park (Ergotron building); zoned and guided Industrial. I Planning Report - Adams Outdoor Advertising August 22, 1995 Page 4 EVALUATION OF REOUEST, Sign Description and Location -The proposed advertising sign is single-faced with a surface area of 480 square feet (10' x 48'). The sign will be mounted on a single steel pole, with the top of the sign 40 ft. above grade. The sign will be positioned to be visible to eastbound I-494 traffic only. The sign will be lit by halophane fixtures mounted on the bottom edge of the sign face. The sign will be located on Soo Line Railroad property that is presently inactive and closed to train use. The applicant indicates that the sign will be placed to meet the required 10 ft. setbacks from any property line, street, highway or railroad right-of-way. Compliance with Off-premise Sign Criteria-The proposed sign meets the criteria for off-premise signs as follows: - This sign will replace a sign included on Table A and will not increase the total number of off-premise signs in the City. - The total square footage of the sign will be 20 s.f. less than permitted on Table A (480 s.f. rather than 500 s.f.). - This sign will be single-faced, thereby reducing the total number of sign surfaces permitted on Table A from 28 to 27. - While the sign face will be larger than 250 s.f.,the net result will be a reduction of the total sign square footage and surfaces areas depicted on Table A from 7,960 s.f. to 7,940 s.f. - There are no other off-premise signs within 1,500 lineal feet on the same side of the street or 300 lineal feet on the opposite side of the street. - There are no business signs on this property. • - There are no free-standing ground or pylon signs within 300 ft. - No residentially zoned property is located within 200 ft. - The sign will not exceed 40 ft. in height above grade. In addition,the property does not contain an existing building or structure and is zoned industrial as required by code. Compatibility with Surrounding Area - The proposed sign location is adjacent to the Eagandale Office Park/Industrial Park adjacent to I-494. There are no residential uses in the vicinity that would be impacted by this sign. Issues - Minutes from the May 18, 1993 City Council meeting discussion on the new sign ordinance indicate that the Adams location (#11 on Table A) was specifically added to Table A after the City Council approved a CUP for that sign. However it is not clear if signs specified on Table A were specifically tied to CUPs, and are therefore only valid if the CUPs fo rthe signs were recorded. If this interpretation is taken, expiration of a CUP would effectively remove the associated sign from Table A. With regard to relocating signs, the May 18, 1993 City Council 1 Planning Report - Adams Outdoor Advertising August 22, 1995 Page 5 minutes state that the Council did not want any limits placed on the number of times a sign can be moved, as long as there was no net increase in number or size of signs. SUMMARY/CONCLUSION The applicant is requesting "relocation" of the sign square footage previously approved per Table A along I-35E at Diff ley to a location along I-494 at Hwy 55. The proposed location is adjacent to commercial/industrial development, whereas the previously approved location was in an area designated for neighborhood business, in close proximity to residentially zoned property. The new sign will not increase the total number of off-premise signs in the City and will result in a reduction of total sign square footage and sign surfaces indicated on Table A. Approval of this request will constitute an amendment of Table A in the sign code to replace sign #11 on the existing list with the location, square footage and surfaces of the proposed sign. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED To recommend approval or denial of the requested Conditional Use Permit for Adams Outdoor Advertising allowing an off-premise sign located south of I-494, west of Hwy 55, on Soo Line Railroad property in the NE 1/4 of Section 3. Approval subject to the following conditions: 1. The Conditional Use Permit shall be recorded at Dakota County within 60 days of Council approval with documentation provided to the City. 2. Applicant shall submit a detailed site plan illustrating the sign location, including setbacks, drawn to scale prior to issuance of a sign permit. 3. The sign will be subject to the one-time sign fee of 52.50/sq.ft. 4. All applicable City Codes. t7"."--. FINANCIAL OBLIGATION - 3-CU-15-6-95 Railroad Right-of-Way There are pay-off balances of special assessments totaling SO on the parcel proposed for which the conditional use is requested. At this time, there are no pending assessments on the parcel for which the conditional use permit is requested. The estimated financial obligation presented is subject to change based upon areas, dimensions and land uses contained in the final plat. Based upon the study of the financial obligations collected in the past and the uses proposed for the property, the following charges are proposed. The charges are computed using the City's existing fee schedule and the connections proposed to be made to the City's utility system based on the submitted plans. Improvement Use Rate Quantity Amount Railroad right-of-way is not charged for City utilities. 1 ( 3 3 i I G H I J K I I I HEIGHTS 0 950 ...Es° 1250 -- _�� ------ -- ��� .�. —� ___--- ------v iiiL/000-- 1 r rig i TRAPP R• ill' . \* • ALI,. J • /1,F 1 , 1 Neor�Vp� CORPORATE -a t _A 1 • -TRIAL 'y, . I I ) ® RO • i. 1 1 C CENTER CURVE r ''�" G i al I ■• ■ T. T C-A * A. ::';1 .. -Y 1 ATRK E T. , V• I I ! LEXNGT• �f{. .AL+ `I PARK '� . 41 wESr -� 1 , '. '; i4liji! :POST C) 1 90 CO. •. Z6_LONE OAK _ _Lot 0 im �ARK� � � Or'� � i g I , 0.U3VEw DWI APOLLO ROA 0 RD. • 1 Ew RD. ' ►� ' l';.1 ., E. ■ TZi- I, _._...._....._ .._ ,� f q __•■•■ li 1 .. , , I ALORN DR. g ,g r• a I TAMARAC PT. 55121 I r+ . o • -NORWAY PT. I e I _.,_ - NORwAT PT. ^ FOREST ROOF TR. I I U - RONWOOD LA. 1 :a, _ REDWOOD PT. ^ a 1 'a SPRUCE PT. "V I� YANKEE DOOOLE ROAD .- - - -• I Iii' rii t' ...Et PL 4:4.. .ra ' -.... _____0. ,M 5 1 , 1 O , CARMAtif MIS 1 M'Eii• (�� RD d 1 T h \ Cl n: �1 // .` u �--� 1_� G�1CF COWS( v, LOCATION 1 in N c MENDOTA —"HTS. fir ' R r� m ZONING 111P1 ---..' mpi-2:F_ L..- E' 4.J.- �'� \. � -1 (Light Industrial) I _ ' _""' � . .�'-�'`� - i '•( X7 ,` 1? ��(, „J 4 t...% ,�' •.1 'Y•• \����t i r . i 4{j s 2. •t� : �PF/ ,C'.'1''-'.. • �/ k°.a . f'••,Ug F 41 �w'n ,f gV Fo,. I'..M <i I Sig t.__ 410- 110 Eakc. w u\ 1"a _ Q t�., COMPREHENSIVE GUIDE PLAN : '•'"' I �J • 1, 1 CPO IND (Industrial) +y' C° IMD / V.\, 1)1 e Pe \ / ., 41k (' �; r - .I)74 1 ri. IMO \••■• 4 Mqi c dial \. ^ .- 1 C • 3/04ci-torr___,-atiN.� — �, .,. 10 '� _ Se� \�- `�`•,` TAT I�OF'IJI �S ,6r1 - -- '.,. 191. 140.16 ss lo letk- at Sew,,,), % 147 II. Ejtl ` "Tree 0, � 4 Crib "- P PART OF T/b1c1C '•e l,� _l o. PART OF ° 5 @(osed) RT OF 4 4 3 „,,, t . 16 tt t',7 ti 10 a.96 6 .. \ / 101 199.01 W l'le3a\ \ ` ,ri` --- - 2 N --\ -v 4,4.1#s\ ....∎. 2 •�, .J \\ '7\_ _- 6o, Nr::::\ — - ..7;----70601111111111111Mikellk \ ...,, 5 \ \ : a -P a 0 3 0. ;; 4 dt 14 A) i r ly '\ 111 a v a.H Q " i Table "A" Number of Signs Location Square Feet urfaces 1. Highway 3 - 1.4 miles south of County Road 32 500 square feet 2 2. Highway 55 -junction with Highway 149 500 square feet 2 3. Highway 55 - east of Lexington 110 square feet 2 4. Highway 13 - between Cedar and Rahn 500 square feet 2 5. Highway-1-3—at-Silver---Bell (deleted 6/20/95) et 2 I-494 west of Highway 149 (added 6/20/95) 756 square feet 2 (588 s.f.) 6. Highway 13 - between Cedar and County Road 30 250 square feet 1 7. MN 77 - north of Highway 13 (on railroad) 756 square feet 2 8. MN 77 - between County Roads 30 and 32 756 square feet 2 9. MN 77 - north of Highway 13 756 square feet 2 10. I-35E - north of Lone Oak 756 square feet 2 11. (deleted 9/5/95) 500 square foot 2 Soo Line right-of-way - south of I-494, west of Highway 55 (added 9/5/95) 480 square feet 1 (20 s.f.) (1) 12. Highway 149 - south of Yankee Doodle Road 165 square feet 3 13. I-494 - west of Pilot Knob Road 756 square feet 2 14. I-494 -junction of I-3 SE 756 square feet 2 • 14 8;405 square feet 28 7,797 27 NOTE: ( ) denotes banked // REVISED 9/95 Table"A" Number of Signs Location Square Feet Surfaces 1. Highway 3 - 1.4 miles south of County Road 32 500 square feet 2 2. Highway 55 -junction with Highway 149 500 square feet 2 3. Highway 55 - east of Lexington 110 square feet 2 4. Highway 13 - between Cedar and Rahn 500 square feet 2 5. (deleted 6/20/95) 47344-square-feet 2 I-494 west of Highway 149 (added 6/20/95) 756 square feet 2 (588 s.£) 6. Highway 13 - between Cedar and County Road 30 250 square feet 1 7. MN 77 - north of Highway 13 (on railroad) 756 square feet 2 8. MN 77 - between County Roads 30 and 32 756 square feet 2 9. MN 77 - north of Highway 13 756 square feet 2 10. I-3 SE - north of Lone Oak 756 square feet 2 11. I-35E - south of Diffley 500 square feet 2 12. Highway 149 - south of Yankee Doodle Road 165 square feet 3 13. I-494 - west of Pilot Knob Road 756 square feet 2 14. I-494 - junction of I-3 SE 756 square feet 2 14 8,40-5 square feet 28 7,817 NOTE: ( } denotes banked / REVISED 9/95 Agenda Information Memo September 5, 1995 Eagan City Council Meeting D. COMPREHENSIVE GUIDE PLAN AMENDMENT - CITY OF EAGAN ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: To approve or deny a Comprehensive Guide Plan amendment changing the land use designation of approximately 20 acres from D-I (Single-family Residential, 0 to 3 units per acre) to IND (Industrial). This land consists of nine platted lots in Halley's 1st Addition and two adjacent unplatted parcels located east of Highway 3 and north of Gun Club Road, in the Southeast 1/4 of Section 36. FACTS: • The subject property was part of the Southeast Industrial Area Land Use Study. • The Council reviewed the Southeast Industrial Area Land Use Study on May 2, 1995 and May 15, 1995. Regarding the subject property, the City Council directed exploration of creating a new industrial zoning district that would be compatible with residential uses. Numerous options relative to a new zoning district for the area were outlined by staff and presented to the City Council. After review of these options,the City Council determined that the current I-1 zoning standards, if properly enforced, could achieve the desired result of compatibility with adjacent land uses. As such, the current I-1 zoning classification was left in place. For consistency with the zoning, the Land Use Guide Plan designation would need to be amended from D-I to IND. • On August 22, 1995, the APC conducted a public hearing on this Comprehensive Guide Plan amendment. A motion to recommend approval failed 3-4. A motion to recommend denial passed 4-3. ATTACHMENTS Minutes of the APC - ages /• _W.0throu h . Staff report - pages / through p 4 . 1 7 Page 13 August 22, 1995 ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION COMPREHENSIVE GUIDE PLAN AMENDMENT- CITY OF EAGAN Chairman Miller opened the next public hearing of the evening regarding a Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment changing the land use designation from D-I (Single Family Residential, 0-3 dwelling units per acre) to IND (Industrial) for approximately 20 acres located on Lots 1-5, Block 1, and Lots 1-4, Block 2, Halley's Addition and P.I.D. #'s 10-03600-021-79 and 10-03600-022-79 in the SE1/4 of Section 36. Planner Ridley introduced this item. Mr. Ridley highlighted the information presented in the City staffs planning report dated August 7, 1995. Mr. Ridley noted that the City's proposal for a comprehensive guide plan amendment for the Halley Addition is a result of the City Council's directive that the area be redesignated Industrial in order that it be guided consistently with the zoning designation. No persons from the public were _ present for comment. Member Isberg stated that he disagreed with the City's handling or procedure in dealing with this issue. He expressed concern that by amending the comprehensive guide plan designation to Industrial, the City will be locked in with an industrial use when the surrounding areais being developed residential and the future use of the subject property may not be industrial. Member Heyl added that the end result may be a forgone conclusion because the City Council directed the amendment to the comprehensive guide plan. Member Heyl noted that she concurs with Member Isberg's concerns and disfavors the application for the amendment. Chairman Miller stated that the proposed guide plan amendment merely brings the comprehensive guide plan the land use designation to be consistent with the current zoning of the subject property. Member Heyl noted that as an alternative to bring the zoning and the land use designation together consistently, the City may rezone the subject property to R-1 from Industrial. Member Burdorf added that an industrial zoning may not be a good long-term plan for the City and Member Segal added that the City should have learned from history that it is inappropriate to "run with a land use" that is inconsistent with the surrounding area. Member Carlson concurred with Member Segal; however, she stated the property owners in this area have made substantial investments. Member Carlson moved, Wallace seconded, a motion to recommend approval of a Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment changing the land use designation from D-I (Single Family Residential, 0-3 dwelling units per acre) to IND (Industrial) for approximately 20 acres located on Lots 1-5, Block 1, and Lots 1-4, Block 2, Halley's Addition and P.I.D. #'s 10-03600-021-79 and 10-03600-022-79 in the SE1/4 of Section 36. Members Miller, Wallace and Carlson all voted in favor and Members Heyl, Segal, Burdorf and Isberg voted in opposition to the motion. Pjp Page 14 August 22, 1995 ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION The motion fails by a vote of 3 to 4. Member Heyl moved, Member Isberg a motion to recommend denial of the Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment on the grounds that the proposed land use designation is not compatible with the surrounding area and the issue of noncompatability will only be exasperated in the future as the surrounding area continues to be developed as single family. All approved in favor except Members Miller, Wallace and Carlson, who opposed. r 1 Q' 1 PLANNING REPORT CITY OF EAGAN REPORT DATE: August 7, 1995 CASE #: CG-36-7-7-95 APPLICANT: City of Eagan HEARING DATE: August 22, 1995 PROPERTY OWNER: See Attachment PREPARED BY: Kristy Marnin REQUEST: Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment changing the land use designation from D-I (Single-family Residential, 0 to 3 units per acre) to IND (Industrial) LOCATION: East of Highway 3 and north of Gun Club Road, in the Southeast 1/4 of Section 36 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: D-I (Single-family Residential, 0 to 3 units per acre) ZONING: I-1 (Limited Industrial) SUMMARY OF REQUEST The City of Eagan is proposing a Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment changing the land use designation of approximately 20 acres from D-I (Single-family Residential, 0 to 3 units per acre) to IND (Industrial). This land consists of nine platted lots in Halley's 1st Addition and two adjacent unplatted parcels located east of Highway 3 and north of Gun Club Road, in the Southeast 1/4 of Section 36. . BACKGROUND/HISTORY The City initiated a land use study in September 1994 to determine the most appropriate long term land use and zoning for the Southeast Industrial Area, an area in the southeast corner of Eagan generally bounded by Highway 3, the Eagan/Rosemount border, Gun Club Road and the proposed Red Pine Lane. The entire study area encompassed approximately 42 acres. However, only a part of this study area—approximately 20 acres--is the subject of this plan amendment action. The land use study was presented to the Advisory Planning Commission on April 25, 1995. The APC recommendation encompassed the entire 42-acre study area. This recommendation was that the residential land use designation be retained, the I-1 zoned properties.be rezoned to R-1, and the Gun Club property remain zoned PF. Alternatively, the APC recommended that if the property owners petition to rezone the area to Industrial Planned Development and an acceptable agreement is worked out between the City and property owners,the area could remain industrial. D•■ Planning Report - Comp Guide Plan Amendment in SE 1/4 Section 36 August 22, 1995 Page 2 The City Council considered the APC's recommendation at its May 2, 1995 meeting,and decided to separate the study area into three separate areas--the area north of Gun Club Road, the Gun Club, and the area south of the Gun Club—rather than one for action. For the property north of Gun Club Road, the City Council directed initiation of a feasibility study for the installation of public improvements to serve the industrial area, and directed exploration of creating a new industrial zoning district that would be compatible with residential uses. Numerous options relative to a new zoning district for the area were outlined by staff and presented to the City Council at a workshop meeting on May 15, 1995. After review of these options, the City Council determined that the current I-1 zoning standards, if properly enforced, could achieve the desired result of compatibility with adjacent land uses. As such, the current I-1 zoning classification was left in place. For the Gun Club, the City Council directed that the zoning and Guide Plan designation remain unchanged. For the area south of the Gun Club, the City Council directed the APC to hold a public hearing on a rezoning to Agricultural, with the Guide Plan remaining D-I (Single-family Residential, 0 to 3 units per acre). The APC held a public hearing on June 27, 1995 and recommended approval of the rezoning to Agricultural. This rezoning was approved by the City Council on July 11, 1995. EXISTING CONDITIONS All of the lots in the subject area have a use, but not all lots have structures on them. For those lots with structures,the uses within the buildings generally consist of manufacturing, engine/auto repair or equipment storage. Those lots without structures (one of the two unpiatted lots and two of the lots in Halley's 1st Addition) are or have been used for outdoor storage of one form or another. Most of the lots with structures also have outdoor storage. EVALUATION OF REQUEST The subject properties have been zoned I-1 since 1968, and Halley's 1st Addition was platted in 1972. The land use designation for the subject properties was R-II (Mixed Residential, 3 to 6 units per acre) from 1974 to 1988. In 1988, the land use designation became D-I (Single-family Residential, 0 to 3 units per acre). As such, the zoning and the long term land use designation for the subject properties have been inconsistent with each other for over 20 years. For years, the City Council considered this industrial use a temporary use. The Council viewed the area as incubator space until urban residential development came to this area. As residential development proceeded south of Cliff Road and the new school was proposed, the City Council decided to evaluate what the long range future land use should be. The City Council determined / c; 3 Planning Report - Comp Guide Plan Amendment in SE 1/4 Section 36 August 22, 1995 Page 3 that the long term use for the subject parcels is industrial, consistent with the zoning. The requested Guide Plan amendment will make the zoning and land use designation consistent with each other. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED To recommend approval or denial of a Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment changing the land use designation of approximately 20 acres from D-I (Single-family Residential, 0 to 3 units per acre) to 1ND (Industrial). / C2 (I( REPORT ATTACHMENT: PROPERTY OWNERS THEODORE WOOD GARY WOOD JOHN J YOUNG JULIE YOUNG WILLIAM G SCHILTZ WEIRKE TRENCHING & EX CO DENNIS C HYSTER JILL HYSTER MEGA INC (CONTRACT FOR DEED) RICHARD W SKINN ARMAND LAURENT CAROL LAURENT MALCOLM MACFARLANE M MACFARLANE JAMES OBERG 0 ) • • ' I ' 1/ .. ,,,,,, , ,‘ , ..._ 777 1,....-•••,...-__4 I ,, ;I , 1 A' 41 11-1-.21111 I -a•k ,,,,,, ;7 'Wild'il ens • •iL :'7 • ... 0 a LIS 10 r i vial .;1 \--........ ''' • ; Adi ' KIN .r -�-- ...-- i ...._...._ � I .i '*-<,,,,...„ 1.14 .... . `� I. ,,., _.L-� 1 ° ! - ,',/ I ., 1 hi 114 II an 0 !. raft 8 :_::___-__ __ ' .... :1:: :'" . •:. _�__ r - ��4: W, i ,,, ..,,, ,,,,/ i LP_„ SUBJECT SITE II ., Y 7' e Y ; I Li 1 0 Q t ,I • .l i F / _ - ),11 ii •-._._________ F- - sa.u. .0. _t- .alas/�T Y -S 120, sr 99 /' .j / CITY RQSEMounrr I,-'/ // I. I, / Y; ,,,x. • ,I iVi• v'ao ,• • j ' III A /al (t° Agenda Information Memo September 5, 1995 Eagan City Council Meeting E. PRELIMINARY PLANNED DEVELOPMENT & PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION - RIVERPARK OFFICE CENTER ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: To approve or deny the RiverPark Office Center Preliminary Planned Development to permit four new 100,000 sq. ft. office buildings on 52.5 acres. To approve or deny the RiverPark Office Center Preliminary Subdivision consisting of six lots of 52.5 acres located at 3400 Yankee Drive, west of Highway 13 and south of Yankee Doodle Road. FACTS: • Blue Cross Blue Shield(BCBS) is proposing an expansion of four new 100,000 sq. ft. office buildings on the site that contains the existing 190,787 sq. ft. RiverPark office building (formerly Comsery headquarters). The existing building and each of the new buildings will be interconnected via a second story skyway. • BCBS has been located in Eagan since 1970 and currently employs approximately 3,000 people. The proposed expansion will be phased over several years and result in over 1,000 additional employees at this location. • The Advisory Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on this proposed Preliminary Planned Development and Preliminary Subdivision at its regular meeting on August 22, 1995. The Commission recommends approval of the Preliminary Planned Development and Preliminary Subdivision subject to conditions. • On August 22, 1995, the City received a letter outlining concerns of M.C. Gresser. ISSUES: • The only outstanding issue is the water quality dedication requirement. The Advisory Parks, Recreation, and Natural Resources Commission and the Advisory Planning Commission recommend ponding to meet water quality requirements to be done on site; however, Blue Cross/Blue Shield is requesting to pay a cash water quality dedication in lieu of on-site - ponding. BACKGROUND/ATTACHMENTS: (3) APC minutes of August 21, 1995, ages(throughI f 0 Staff Report, pages / 3(through(St . Letter from M.C. Gresser, page j "S j. 1 i Page 18 August 22, 1995 ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION BLUE CROSS BLUE SHIELD - PRELIMINARY PLANNED DEVELOPMENT & PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION Chairman Miller opened the next public hearing of the evening regarding a Preliminary Planned Development to permit the addition of four new 100,000 square foot office buildings on 52.5 acres and a Preliminary Subdivision (RiverPark Office Center) consisting of 6 lots on 52.5 acres located at 3400 Yankee Drive, west of Highway 13 and south of Yankee Doodle Road in the south %2 of Section 8 and the north %2 of Section 17. Miller further noted a letter from M.C. Gresser expressing his concerns of the proposal. Planner Ridley introduced this item. Mr. Ridley highlighted the information presented in the City staffs planning report dated August 1, 1995. Mr. Ridley noted the background and history, the existing conditions and the surrounding uses of the subject - property. Mr. Ridley further outlined the City staffs evaluation of the applicant's request. Representatives of the applicant were present but did not give any presentation. Member Hey' stated that she supports the proposal. Member Wallace inquired with the applicant's representatives as to the necessity of the expansion of Yankee Doodle Road as a cul-de-sac. Chuck Hall, a representative of the applicant, advised that there was a need to expand Yankee Doodle Road to permit greater access to the back of the property for safety reasons (fire/police access). Mr. Hall further stated that the applicant will meet the City's requirements for ponding and water quality. Member Burdorf moved, Member Segal seconded, a motion to recommend approval of a Preliminary Planned Development to permit the addition of four new 100,000 square foot office buildings on 52.5 acres located at 3400 Yankee Drive, west of Highway 13 and south of Yankee Doodle Road in the south 1/2 of Section 8 and the north Y2 of Section 17, subject to the following conditions: 1. The RiverPark Office Center Preliminary Planned Development allows for the construction of four new 100,000 square foot office buildings. 2. The RiverPark Office Center Planned Development shall expire 15 years from the date of City Council approval. 3. A Preliminary Planned Development Agreement shall be executed prior to final subdivision approval. The following exhibits are necessary for this Agreement: * Preliminary Site Plan * Preliminary Building Elevation Plan * Preliminary Sign Plan * Preliminary Landscape Plan / f Page 19 August 22, 1995 ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION Upon submission of Final plans,provided they are in conformance with the Preliminary Planned Development, the Final Planned Development of each lot may proceed to the City Council for approval. 4. MPCA approval of the Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) is required. 5. MPCA approval of the Indirect Source Permit (ISP) is required. 6. No transfer or sale of any lot shall occur until and unless the owner provides the City with evidence of access to a public street and proof of adequate parking for the lot(s) to be sold. 7. Development of Lot 6 shall be limited to parking and driveways as shown on the preliminary site plan. 8. The property shall be platted. All approved in favor. Member Burdorf moved, Member Segal seconded, a motion to recommend approval of a Preliminary Subdivision (RiverPark Office Center) consisting of 6 lots on 52.5 acres located at 3400 Yankee Drive, west of Highway 13 and south of Yankee Doodle Road in the south 1/2 of Section 8 and the north 1/2 of Section 17, subject to the following conditions: Standard Conditions 1. The applicant shall comply with these standard conditions of plat approval as adopted by Council on February 3, 1993: Al, B1, B2, B3, B4, Cl, C2, C3, C4, D1, El,F1, G1, and H1. 2. The property shall be platted. Grading 3. Pond CP-7 shall be expanded to meet flood volume and outflow requirements of its designated tributary drainage district in accordance with the City Storm Water Management Plan. Utilities 4. The alignment of the proposed water main shall be revised so that the water main along Yankee Doodle Road north of Terminal Drive is shown out of the City right- of-way. l CI / 7 Page 20 - August 22, 1995 ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION Streets/Access 5. As part of the first phase of this development, Yankee Doodle Road shall be upgraded and reconfigured. 6. As part of the first phase of this development, Kennebec Drive shall be extended from Blackhawk Road to serve the development. 7. BCBS shall provide and record a declaration or covenants providing the availability of adequate parking and access to public streets for Lots 1-5. All approved in favor. ( 30 PLANNING REPORT CITY OF EAGAN REPORT DATE: August 1, 1995 CASE: 17/8-PP-24-6-95 APPLICANT: Blue Cross Blue Shield HEARING DATE: August 22, 1995 PROPERTY OWNER: Same PREPARED BY: Mike Ridley REQUEST: Preliminary Planned Development and Preliminary Subdivision (RiverPark Office Center) LOCATION: 3400 Yankee Drive COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: Industrial (IND) ZONING: Limited Industrial (LI) SUMMARY OF REQUEST Blue Cross Blue Shield of Minnesota, Inc. (BCBS) is requesting approval of a Preliminary Planned Development to permit the addition of four new 100,000 SF office buildings on 52.5 acres and a Preliminary Subdivision consisting of 6 lots on 52.5 acres located at 3400 Yankee Drive, west of Highway 13 and south of Yankee Doodle Road in the south 1/2 of Section 8 and the north 1/2 of Section 17. • AUTHORITY FOR REVIEW City Code Section 13.20 Subd. 6 states that "In the case of platting, the Planning Commission and the Council shall be guided by criteria, including the following, in approving, denying or establishing conditions related thereto:" A. That the proposed subdivision does comply with applicable City Code provisions and the Comprehensive Guide Plan. B. That the design or improvement of the proposed subdivision complies with applicable plans of Dakota County, State of Minnesota, or the Metropolitan Council. C .That the physical characteristics of the site including but not limited to, topography, vegetation, susceptibility to erosion and siltation, susceptibility to-flooding, water storage, and retention are such that the site is suitable for the type of development or use contemplated. ( 5 ( Planning Report • RiverPark Office Center August 22, 1995 Page 2 D. That the site physically is suitable for the proposed density of the development. E. That the design of the subdivision or the proposed improvements is not likely to cause environmental damage. F. That the design of the subdivision or the type of improvements is not likely to cause health problems. G. That the design of the subdivision or the improvements will not conflict with easements of record or with easements established by judgement of court. H. That completion of the proposed development of the subdivision can be completed in a timely manner so as not to cause an economic burden upon the City for maintenance, repayment of bonds or similar burden. I. That the subdivision has been properly planned for possible solar energy system use within the subdivision or as it relates to adjacent property. (Refer to City Handbook on Solar Access) J. That the design of public improvements for the subdivision is compatible and consistent with the platting or approved preliminary plat on adjacent lands. K. That the subdivision is in compliance with those standards set forth in that certain document entitled "City of Eagan Water Quality Management Plan for the Gun Club Lake Watershed Management Organization" which document is properly approved and filed with the office of the City Clerk hereinafter referred to as the "Water Quality Management Plan". Said document and all of the notations, references and other information contained therein shall have the same force and effect as if fully set down herein and is hereby made a part of this Chapter by reference and incorporated herein as fully as if set forth herein at length. It shall be the responsibility of the City Clerk to maintain the Water Quality Management Plan and make the same available to the public. Planned Develonment: Chapter 11.20, Subd. 8, B., petermination. states: "In considering any petition for such district, the Planning Commission and the Council in the interests of carrying out the intent and purpose of this Subdivision, shall determine whether or not such planned development will: (1) better adapt itself to its physical and aesthetic setting and that ofsurrounding lands than . does development of the underlying zoning district; (2) be feasible for the owner and developer economically to complete according to proposed plans; / 32_ Planning Report - RiverPark Office Center August 22, 1995 Page 3 (3) benefit the community at large to a greater degree than would development of the underlying zoning district." BACKGROUND/HISTORY The site contains the four story, 190,787 SF,RiverPark office building(formerly Comsery Realty Corporation headquarters)that was completed in 1983. The 62.6 acre Comsery No. 1 subdivision was approved by the City in July 1982. The subdivision created a 41.1 acre lot (Lot 1, Block 1), and a 21.5 acre outlot (Outlot A). The outlot, which was ultimately separated from Lot 1, Block 1, Comsery No. 1 by Yankee Drive (formerly Comsery Drive), was re-platted in 1986 as Lot 1, Block 1, R.L. Johnson 2nd Addition. Dun & Bradstreet Software Services (D&B) acquired the building and 41 acre site from Comsery in 1988. In 1990, D&B acquired an additional 11 4 acres between Lot 1, Block 1, Comsery No 1 and the railroad right-of-way which results in the total site size of 52.5 acres. BCBS began subleasing parts of the office building in 1992 and purchased the building and site in March of 1995. BCBS has been located in Eagan since 1970 and currently employs approximately 3,000 people. The original 200,000 SF main building located at 3535 Blue Cross Road was completed in 1970. Expansions to this building have occurred since that time to bring the total square footage of this building to approximately 400,000 BCBS presently occupies 800,000 - 900,000 square feet in Eagan which includes the original building, the RiverPark building, the ten-story office building at 1200 Yankee Doodle Road, and leased space at 1305 Corporate Center Drive. EXISTING CONDITIONS BCBS has 550 employees working at the existing RiverPark office facility. The entire site has previously been graded and generally has a gently rolling topography that includes an elevation change of 70' from the high point at the southern tip to the low point along the northwesterly edge of the site. SURROUNDING USES The following existing uses, zoning, and comprehensive guide plan designations surround the subject property: North - Transport America/Gressor Masonry; zoned and designated Industrial. South - Office-showroom/Undeveloped; zoned and designated Industrial. East - Office-showroom/Best Brands; zoned and designated Industrial. West - Railroad Right-of-way/Flood Plain; zoned and designated Park. 3 5 Planning Report - RiverPark Office Center August 22, 1995 Page 4 ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW Because the proposed building expansion exceeds 300,000 SF, an Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW)must be prepared for review and approval by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA). Additionally, because the total required parking for the proposed expansion exceeds 2000 parking spaces, an Indirect Source Permit (ISP) will also require review and approval by the MPCA. The City cannot give Final approval of this subdivision until the EAW and ISP have been approved by MPCA. EVALUATION OF REQUEST Preliminary Planned Development Long range planning performed by BCBS has identified the need for expansion at this site. In . addition to the existing 190,787 SF office building, BCBS is proposing to develop four additional 100,000 SF office buildings. Each building will be occupied by BCBS employees or by employees of a BCBS subsidiary. The expansion will be phased over several years and result in over 1,000 additional employees at this location. The development plan shows three new buildings between the existing office and Yankee Doodle Road and one on the south side of the existing office. All buildings will be interconnected via a second-story "skyway". The additional parking can be accommodated by extending the existing parking lot in a logical fashion to the northeast and southeast. This expansion will keep the parking in a centralized area as opposed to providing individual parking lots for each new building. BCBS is proposing a planned development and subdivision that will create a situation where each building footprint (existing and proposed) will be platted as a separate lot and a sixth lot will be platted that surrounds the other five. The sixth lot will be common space supporting each of the buildings by providing access and parking. Compatibility with Surrounding Area-The proposed rezoning from Limited Industrial to Planned Development and Preliminary Planned Development permitting a phased office park development will be an expansion of an existing use that has been operating for over ten years that will continue to be compatible with the surrounding area. lata - The lots containing buildings (Lots 1-5) will only be the approximate size of the that particular building footprint ranging in size from .93 - 2.1 acres, while Lot 6 will be 46.5 acres. The subdivision design will result in each building exceeding the maximum lot coverage allowed of 35% for lots 1-5; however, a more accurate measure of building to lot intensity is the aggregate building lot coverage of the entire planned development, which is only 11%. / L( Planning Report - RiverPark Office Center August 22, 1995 Page 5 Setbacks - As with lot coverage, the subdivision design will not allow standard building to lot line setbacks to be met for Lots 1-5, however, all building and parking setbacks will exceed standard setback requirements from the property boundary line. Term. - The anticipated buildout provides for occupancy of the fourth and final new building in 2002;however, market forces will play a role in the development of each phase. Because of this uncertainty, BCBS is proposing a 15 year term for the RiverPark Office Center Planned Development. Parking - The are 717 - 10' wide parking stalls currently on site. In an effort to minimize the amount of impervious surface and because their daily office parking has little, if any, turn-over, BCBS is proposing to provide 9' wide stalls for the existing building (through restriping) and all future parking to be constructed. The City Code requires on-site parking for office uses at the rate of one parking stall for each 150 SF of net leasable office space. Net leasable has been interpreted by staff to be defined as 80% of the gross floor area. When the site is built out there will be a net office space square footage of 472,600 SF which requires 3,151 parking spaces. BCBS has analyzed their current and anticipated parking needs for this site and have determined that their parking needs calculate to one parking space for every 278 SF of net office space and, as such,they are proposing to construct parking at that rate which will total 1,751 spaces, which is a difference of 1,400 spaces from the Code required parking; however, BCBS has designated the 10+ acres along the northwestern edge of the site as a "proof of parking" area that could be developed for over 1,400 parking spaces if needed . Architecture - BCBS has not finalized the exterior building materials to be used for each new office building; however, their intent is to insure that all structures will be architecturally compatible. Architectural guidelines will need to be established when Phase 1 is finalized and will carry over to subsequent phases. Landscaping - The preliminary Landscape Plan is acceptable. The plan provides a continuation of previously established landscaping theme. The Final Landscape Plan will have to detail the specific size and type of materials to be provided and all materials shall meet City Code minimum size requirements. Signage - BCBS should provide an overall sign plan that includes all proposed building, monument, and directional signage. Preliminary Subdivision Grading/Wetlands - With some modifications, the preliminary grading plan is acceptable. The existing storm water pond (CP-7) located on site should be expanded to meet flood volume and 35 • Planning Report - RiverPark Office Center August 22, 1995 Page 6 outflow requirements of the entire drainage district in accordance with the City's Storm Water Management Plan. There are no jurisdictional wetlands within the development site which will be filled or drained. ,Storm Drainage/Water Ouality, - With some modifications, the preliminary storm drainage plan is acceptable. The storm sewer layout should be revised to include additional catch basins and storm sewer to handle run-off from the expanded parking areas. The City's Storm Water Management Plan recommends construction of a 48" trunk storm sewer pipe from the northwest edge of this site to Pond CP-8. If the need for constructing the proof of parking area is ever realized, the developer may petition the City to construct this pipe as a public improvement. Storm water from two-thirds of the site (which includes all improved areas) drains through two storm water basins, first to CP-7 (located on the RiverPark site), which discharges to CP- 8 before discharging into CP- 9, a 45-foot deep flooded gravel pit located in Ft. Snelling State Park which has been recommended for re-assignment to a"recreational" classification by the Advisory Parks, Recreation, and Natural Resource Commission (APRNRC). The addition of four buildings and expansion of the existing parking lot will approximately double the area of impervious coverage on the 34 acres draining to CP-7. Also,the western edge of the site designated as "proof of parking" for 1,400 spaces will result in a high impervious coverage in that area, if developed. The developer has provided a water quality pond to serve this proof of parking area. If the proof of parking area is constructed, the design of this pond must meet NURP standards. Because of the increase in impervious surface and associated run off to CP-7, the City's Water Resource Coordinator is recommending to the APRNRC that BCBS meet it's water quality treatment requirements with on-site ponding by expanding CP-7. BCBS would prefer to pay a cash water quality dedication in lieu of on-site treatment so they can maximize the use of the 55 acre site. Utilities - Minor revisions are necessary to the preliminary utility layout. Sufficient sanitary sewer and water main service is available to serve this site. The proposed water main extension alignment from Terminal Drive to the Yankee Doodle Road cul-de-sac should be moved from the City's right-of-way onto BCBS property. Access/Street Design - The proposed access plan is acceptable. The site is currently served by two access points, both from Yankee Drive. BCBS is proposing three new access locations to the site; two from Yankee Doodle Road and one from Kennebec Drive. The two new access / 3 4 Planning Report - RiverPark Office Center August 22, 1995 Page 7 locations on Yankee Doodle Road will require the upgrading and reconfiguration of Yankee Doodle Road from Terminal Drive to the north. The existing parking island in the northeast corner of Yankee Doodle Road and Terminal Drive along with the striped parking area along the north side of Yankee Doodle Road adjacent to the property in the northwest corner of that intersection will need to be removed to provide a full 44 foot wide access street along the east side of the development. A condition of Preliminary Subdivision approval for Transport America (located at the northwest intersection of Yankee Doodle Road and Terminal Drive) required the removal of the striped angled parking that exists in the Yankee Doodle Road right-of-way. The Final Subdivision for Transport America is pending and they will be responsible for removing the parking stall striping from the street. Kennebec Drive is proposed to be extended from Blackhawk Road within existing City right-of- way and terminate at a cul-de-sac on the west end of the site. The upgrading and reconfiguration of Yankee Doodle Road and the extension of Kennebec Drive should be accomplished as part of the first phase of development. Fasements/Rights of Way/Permits - BCBS should dedicate a 60 foot radius right-of-way for the construction of the proposed Kennebec Drive cul-de-sac within their site. Tree Preservation - The Tree Preservation Plan is acceptable. The proposed development will result in the removal of approximately 48% of the existing woodlands on site while none of the significant trees will be lost. The Tree Preservation Guidelines allow for the two-phase woodland mass removal of 47.5%. BCBS will have to replace a small number of trees as mitigation for exceeding the 47.5% woodland loss. Dedications-The Parks& Recreation Department is currently reviewing park and trail dedication issues. SUMMARY/CONCLUSION The proposed planned development will allow BCBS building expansion needs at the RiverPark location that they have identified through their long range planning. This expansion plan combined with their other expansion plans in Eagan will result in the employment of approximately 6,000 people. The office park use has been compatible with this area since the early 1980's and the proposed RiverPark Office Center Planned Development expansion will continue to be compatible with this area and also provide a benefit to the entire city. / 5 7 Planning Report - RiverPark Office Center August 22, 1995 Page 8 ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED To approve/deny the RiverPark Office Center Preliminary Planned Development to permit four new 100,000 square foot office buildings on 52.5 acres To approve/deny the RiverPark Office Center Preliminary Subdivision consisting of six lots on 52.5 acres. Approval of the Preliminary Planned Development and Preliminary Subdivision shall be subject to the conditions listed below. PRELIMINARY PLANNED DEVELOPMENT 1. The RiverPark Office Center Preliminary Planned Development allows for the construction of four new 100,000 square foot office buildings. 2. The RiverPark Office Center Planned Development shall expire 15 years from the date of City Council approval. 3. A Preliminary Planned Development Agreement shall be executed prior to final subdivision approval. The following exhibits are necessary for this Agreement: * Preliminary Site Plan • Preliminary Building Elevation Plan . • • Preliminary Sign Plan * Preliminary Landscape Plan Upon submission of Final plans, provided they are in conformance with the Preliminary Planned Development, the Final Planned Development of each lot may proceed to the City Council for approval. 4. MPCA approval of the Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) is required. 5. MPCA approval of the Indirect Source Permit (ISP) is required. 6. No transfer or sale of any lot shall occur until and unless the owner provides the City with evidence of access to a public street and proof of adequate parking for the lot(s) to be sold. . . 7. Development of Lot 6 shall be limited to parking and driveways as shown on the preliminary site plan. 8. The property shall be platted. /38 Planning Report - RiverPark Office Center August 22, 1995 Page 9 PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION Standard Conditions 1. The applicant shall comply with these standard conditions of plat approval as adopted by Council on February 3, 1993: Al, B1, B2, B3, B4, Cl, C2, C3, C4, D1, El, F1, GI, and H1. 2. The property shall be platted. Grading 3. Pond CP-7 shall be expanded to meet flood volume and outflow requirements of its designated tributary drainage district in accordance with the City Storm Water Management Plan. Utilities 4. The alignment of the proposed water main shall be revised so that the water main along Yankee Doodle Road north of Terminal Drive is shown out of the City right-of-way. Streets/Access 7. As part of the first phase of this development, Yankee Doodle Road shall be upgraded and reconfigured. 8. As part of the first phase of this development, Kennebec Drive shall be extended from Blackhawk Road to serve the development. 9. BCBS shall provide and record a declaration or covenants providing the availability of adequate parking and access to public streets for Lots 1-5. /37 FINANCIAL OBLIGATION - Riverpark Office Center There are pay-off balances of special assessments totaling $5,828 on the parcels proposed for platting. The pay-off balance will be allocated to the lots created by the plat. At this time, there are no pending assessments on the parcel proposed for platting. The estimated financial obligation presented is subject to change based upon areas, dimensions and land uses contained in the final plat. Based upon the study of the financial obligations collected in the past and the uses proposed for the property, the following charges are proposed. The charges are computed using the City's existing fee schedule and the connections proposed to be made to the City's utility system based on the submitted plans. Improvement Use Rate Quantity Amount Storm Sewer Trunk C/I 5.116/sq ft 524,700 sq ft $60,865 Total S6 / V0 ONC. HALL CO. Real Estate•Brokerage Counseling•Development Leasing•Management August 4, 1995 Mike Ridley Planner Planning Department City of Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55122-1897 Dear Mike: At the planning review session held July 27, 1995, a question was raised about the background and planning done before the request for the RiverPark Office Center approval process was started. It was indicated to the group that Blue Cross Blue Shield of Minnesota (BCBSM) has an internal long range plan for space growth and use. The plan is proprietary and it is preferred that portions be kept confidential because of the competitive nature of the present business climate. This letter is a synopsis of parts of the plan, and background of the information used in preparing it; as well as indications of the city personnel briefed and consulted, at various times during its formation. Blue Cross Blue Shield of Minnesota has been a corporate citizen of Eagan since March of 1970, on completion of its original main building. The acquisition of the 180 acre site at 3535 Blue Cross Road preceded that date when the area was basically farm land. The original main building of about 200,000 square feet sits on a 55.3 acre site. The original building was almost doubled to 370,00 square feet in April of 1976, with extra space added in the early 90's, and in 1994, to a total of approximately 400,000 square feet of space. The planned development of June of 1981 for the 55 acre site allows for two more 190,000 square foot expansions to be undertaken. On Blue Cross Road, across from the main building and to the east, Blue Cross Blue Shield of Minnesota owns 112.675 acres, which is the residual of the original 180 acre purchase, after park dedication. The city of Eagan has an ongoing discussion with BCBSM about this second site. BCBSM projects its needs on the site in the magnitude of 600,000 square feet of office space. The city will not know its requirements until Fall of 1995. BCBSM presently occupies between 800,000 and 900,000 square feet in Eagan, including the 400,000 at the main building, and at four locations, soon to be five. The long range plan calls for three locations in close proximity, with an undetermined amount of"swing" or short term use space available in the rental market again in close proximity on the so called "Yankee Doodle Corridor." 3862 BRIDGEWATER DRIVE•EAGAN, OT 23•TELEPHONE(612)454.3077 C. HALL CO. BCBSM has explored and is continually bombarded with proposals from other municipalities, including any number from out-state Minnesota. Most of these proposals include subsidies and enticements which as yet have not been sought by BCBSM from the city of Eagan, or offered by the city of Eagan. The long range plan calls for those opportunities to be shelved, to allow BCBSM to attempt to expand on its RiverPark site, as the first step in its planned use of the three sites at the Main Campus, the Blue Cross Road East Campus, and the RiverPark Campus. The sites would include about 2,000,000 feet of space, at approximately 800,000 - 600,000 - and 600,000 square feet respectively. The employee count could approach 6,000 people or about double the present employee count. Before acquiring the RiverPark site, BCBSM occupied the building as a tenant, ultimately leasing the whole building. During the tenancy, BCBSM had acquired an option on the adjacent land, and kept track of the various developments in the area, such as the upgrading of streets, proposed vacating of streets, etc., . and kept Mayor Tom Egan and City Manager Tom Hedges updated on the future of BCBSM interests. Before committing to exercise of the BCBSM purchase option on the land, and negotiation of the purchase of the RiverPark building, BCBSM directed C.Hall Co. to contact the city (Peggy Reichert and Tom Colbert) to discuss the plan to be submitted in a subsequent meeting, outlining five interconnected campus buildings, and seek their support, which was given. The attached letter, dated March 21 , 1995 outlines the procedure. To reach the needs of BCBSM's space use, construction, and leasing plan, from 1995 to 2025, the three 50 to 60 acre sites (each) under consideration need maximum use of the land under the city codes, with as much help from the city as possible, wherever the city has latitude to help. The RiverPark P.D. process will set the tone for the following two developments, and will indicate whether the plan can succeed on three disconnected sites verses unified, larger, more expensive but subsidized sites with fixed plans and commitments. Yours truly, C.Hall Co. Charles F. Hall President 3862 BRIDGEWATER DRIVE•EAGAN, T HONE(612)454-3077 i SHC. HALL CO. Real Estate•Brokerage Counseling•Development Leasing•Management March 21 , 1995 Sharon Zauhar Assistant Vice President Administrative Services Blue Cross Blue Shield of Minnesota 3535 Blue Cross Road PO Box 64560 St. Paul, MN 55164-0560 Dear Ms. Zauhar: This letter is to confirm and report on meetings held on behalf of Blue Cross Blue Shield of Minnesota with officials of the city of Eagan regarding the due diligence undertaken prior to the purchase of the RiverPark building. Initially, Charles Hall met with Tom Colbert, City Engineer, and Peggy Reichert, Director of Economic Development, on February 27, 1995, to ascertain the position of the city on the questions listed below regarding the proposed Blue Cross Blue Shield of Minnesota purchase of the RiverPark building. . Ms. Reichert and Mr. Colbert indicated that they, and presently sitting city officials, could not commit to future actions by their offices or bodies, with out formal applications, and formal hearings and actions by the city. The information they gave us was of a guidance or public information nature. We discussed the following items: 1. Zoning. 2. Future of access westerly of Terminal Drive on Yankee Doodle Road. 3. Future of Kennebec Road right of way and access. 4. Potential very large special assessments now known. 5. Adequacy of parcel for parking in the event of expansion. 6. Green space requirements. 7. Adequacy of water and sewer availability in public streets adjacent to parcel. 8. Their knowledge, if any, of the adequacy of natural gas and NSP electricity. 9. Access to State Highway 13. 10.Suggestions for procedures to be followed in development of the proposed expansion of the use of the site. 3862 BRIDGEWATER DRIVE•EAGAN, HONE(612)454-3077 C. HALL CO. The general response to the verbal picture painted by C.Hall of BCBSM's intentions was positive, and the engineering department looked up the status of Kenebec Drive, and later indicated it had not been vacated. They knew of no new huge city projects in the area. Peggy Reichert suggested a planned unit development process as being the route to future development of the area. BCBSM then commissioned Winsor Faricy to do a preliminary density plan of the site, with a site plan, method of access, and proof of parking. Harry Olsen and C. Hall met with Peggy Reichert on March 9, 1995, and presented the plan attached for her suggestions and reaction. Ms. Reichert was generally positive and supportive of the plan, though she hoped as we do that the proof of parking area towards the river could be left green as long as possible, except for fire truck access. Based upon these meetings, and Winsor Faricy's and C.Hall Co.'s knowledge of the Eagan codes, C.Hall Co. believes this property can be developed according to the plan presented, upon following all of the development procedures of the City of Eagan. Yours truly, C.Hall Co. gji1/4.0/K • Charles F. Hall President cc: Peggy Reichert City of Eagan Tom Colbert City of Eagan Wayne Winsor Winsor Faricy Harry Olsen Winsor Faricy John Healy Oppenheimer Wolff& Donnelly Jackie Jones Blue Cross Blue Shield of Minnesota 3862 BRIDGEWATER DRIVE•EAGAN,MINNESOT 7. LEPHONE(612)454-3077 , 1111 I 1 t I I .illl iiii 1-1 i ———-- . , ---ir Ly--—-—_________ J - "r_______... o ,a,/,41,, i \ I rj ' \ 7. 4 1,!: . " i , 611, ' - 04d . ,tby 44 s b, , •... •■ v g, /, I AnO.4 AI A•op‘a -----a........._ --1 ------- .. 4'4'' 1 .:, - ---1 I Ifrix7 W / 7#. ' // / /ft/I /I •1 q cokrs..1 N'. : .y'/--. - / ,Y 4//... -C.;:' " it // / 1 . 1 ANAL/ 19 UMW,1111.01.5 fliT6A1WOM7WOW 11441.1$0 IO.P OPOPOW Medi(Pige) Pl. OrOce4 -1 1 o tarrnexi4 -4 14.6CI 10,,esef P gf t00%la,44 4"....64 Mir A.64 WM im......Q. WOWS WO(1,4) ti lf VokrOO MP,Iflefaff•/Mune° SIC OPP450 ball,nrob FIT tar 404.4aao(4'ePtia) 1•44. (Pc%) AV" L070 14•4 Wok OVOO Ate Men!foLp lin 4, Mat Q OP* fif,sle I / I 4 •IP•PaW PPC01 WV 00:10TALL'WO sly fp +14 LOr(no,W•1.44) •I*mi.I,.nier .4, i .. ■ ,,n,„,„.Wo6 boto.WW.55o I 270 ter fp t I , . ,. is...., 1111194,1 Ail/ N 2 i : 1 I I D1.17 A. \ 40 / N. '.\\\.\\\.\\ • 67 6 AcRES I \ • \ , 1 la f_t..1,4 A,_. C.OHCO fez sosew wl .7 11 ... /'. .\\,.......\ .... .......___ 1 i ./"..... -.- % .. 9, , . , ,...„... ,, , ,.„..,,...., (..„0„,;-„, . : -- -: , ., .., , ...7).,.„ -„,. 2 _ , _ .. ,-. ---„, ---- ----. •. • . iiil i, ---1 z -ti C , • ,a01, a 04, 14, ., , 0 la ,,,, •' ; . -, i.. avow wpm:m/3 '' iS•,try : .C::: 1 id Cs1 / ° r* 4.4 .1 le ; P. ' 3P•aa 7 . .. -: e . F v'ce in e < f .9 Z.. • , '.7.44 . 4 ., •.'... DK n., .7 l' .1 .. ob.. dr; ..,, N.. ■ - MINA Irk. -NN 4, I 1 ...9 ..: •,' ,. .4„,i,,,c- .... ... .-. ,. _ •.,____10 .., ,,,,y 1,m:;:t. -:. :._ at _ •e-, i • ,,,... 1 k.,,,„... 1 ; .,, wm . . • -, . K :cak • ,/ 100,,(c . .. _ ri7.-8- .. •••...-1 l., • CP lib° i 1 gr. .• I. - 0 NI, , , av MI\' \.:.• d t (41)1 \ Ir" r .- .i 'uo...... ..... : ,_.... , ... .,. ,.. .. .,..„. . .. • 1 '� ;a�w•- � . R_4 -Oac, . -1.- .7;Y:I. :',-•.11. '': •;--;, - •. / ..70,,'...ired''•:."*— 11:..4.-;;;;?.ii-Tti::::;/-Ad A. 14.4;14-4! so ..t.„,„4, 4,1., ZONING ,`. 1 1-1 (Limited Industrial) `- .' % /.-, , !� �i� -- 1e .r•~ . • /', ,• I .fi r`_ 1r. _ /*/ . DUt' Al.I r. r... �. •. (qy�' lyr(f. rit R ._ : 4:1---"4-- .: L 1\i f NCf w ! irL'....... fi • / riII 77 COMPREHENSIVE GUIDE PLAN IND (Industrial) / _ R&D IND j I I D- ,....• D- A D. ' J 0 �`l Al.. . I:—i2 �- ■ n I 7(1( (#1 4 CCI 1 T- QVey - -- O-1Do� Q - --°rte a N i_(l- /10/\> 0 /, / Z U 4 ra ire g K cl\<, a z oc u n \/ \ I 66 '� ny . — , i � I Amt ei E MM r____\ 1 6 ,1 > . g.., ii --tn.r.+s e?1' V P4"w MAy A we.... Y_•5•• •C' 1p.x .a o' M.+•a.aK �. w•wo n..•sa ■••n*+ ■.••rr'WO .......es. _______ _____—_ --IN-7-1 rfr WM.T: :—. - :141 . ' mo IA M.� .� ;d w_ . � �, .: A: , . "Nli � 1w���' • «. A, - '� 1w R� N �1 N AA�wwyA�N \ p,.rw.T....t,"Pt �_.-- -� t.r.r:�,�.�.. /T� - e�er...,...., ME YEW FilOM MY U i ,WinAti�tYArt 10.1. '— '�...w~. IINFIKY�fiK(MfICE f NlFll V':.M , EAGAN,tfM901A ■ II it ta --------ij 1 ,iii 1 � -• I •" Sr ------ ----g-- I ----- - -_ "^.+e t„•••. 0 f - Ic ; I I, 1 r ), . —3--r;-�--t , `.ti I �.t= il I 1 ' I I go01\ ,..... _ -.... .I , ...„..,, ,.... . , 1 Z gP: 1 ,,,-.::-... 1,). -.1 ii, I 11 :: liir 0 W I � 1 /: INN Itg 1 11 //s , I ; 14m 4' i g . ' s ., , - III : II g 1 I ' / dielkte7-- ,,,' ,,/,./ I 0/010/ 414 I Il 3.t` 4I, / ill •1 I ! ,' I , trinkit ,,,,,,, \ 11 I. .e i 11 l I t- �1 ' '` II I II if yl 1. I t I y 5' I'' �'� �\ I:::�e s. 1, 4.•i.'. I t YANKEE 0�7,l O�•" DOODLE~r~` 4....."•'"`'''—_t►- 1: •le f,._ 1----,- :, : ,ri , ,--,,,,, • ---,/,,,, ..Af:1,I, ?! i(4 l ice- a r,,••• '. 00' cr • k. ----1,1 ei v a 0.4 g III /�?t� �•c`' - ,+'°r o $I''I // �Y * ,J' r• r MI 1 Pc a :a a i_gitilir . I. . it e s' ,1 . cc u.: le J 'ti e 1 f , ti Ali a:i: _ q I e I: 11 !p , : ; ----:ii; Is,A =�1 L tN- 910.00. N37,»'•.N / ail .�+ I „:-).4,4- , 1 11\,,•' i • �31 t I i c�►'° L i 1 ivy .... 'r . c>.• ,4_41tiftv,020_ __. .......... 6°1 ( \ t) \\, ii .____r 1 l � 2' .....f.. .... . ....,/..... ..4.. ....e.. ma.IPS— ••III 4,04 ' P rsllrn',./ , / „�!lf.t /:_ Ili f f Pkf€ t I i% !i�lf �1 ! ��% �� : v ao � � i�•�i— �• 1!I1 I 1: I8:i 51 1, 1,p , � , y �. , % / /i 1 �', II � 3 1 i •ililin , ' ibr �` v^, /� / -i,'t.l,`.I ,\� _)i__ III,, I f k I((i 11 1 � J•RID/ _ t IL,III , 1� 9i 1`1 \ ��� I 'I , 11 ,I 111 I ' i 11, k � , '4 ► '� /%-~-- `, 1�:�‘� �'. d � � Y, 11 ', n / / h { . /iris/ ,., fff' Ij ir11 ' / �' jr :HIl/ \\�, • iii/ ^` f -‘_%�/ i, 111!111' i /i ,;' �' ♦ k,hil ,% I W',1 I�i1;rl ',/ -"%1 — _- 1 Illl►u S �� ' / If I' s`I !!r Q jIIL '/, - ' i,,1l. ' d ',' r III1�h -- k,I I42,f,; }I ; •�_ fi ►�- ' +111 V^/ i /1�!r•• r,IrYP,Ip ! 1 1 { ∎ 0. O 41� 0 IhI j1,Mr14 i j 1 '�f`�---- ► �,141 �_ `�% uI� + r+I'I,III Irr , I I 1` ! / / / , P I!'Iii�fiiili, I ! I 1j h, u : .7.7, • ., i / •i\ II 1 a 4 M Ildn 1 I ��:�� / *31„�' ,144rli1 1 I IIf t i../i_aC A 1 I ii r �;4r1'rrr'lr I 1 t p i J ` nN 1<< �); ' 1�'i,1. I;III Iii I I I I /:i' ` t==r_`:,' / Ifi 1 r Y Iiil iilli litirl��N� 1 I I I 1:.:� `J J �%���/ i! I iE I I / n 1 i I1111111V4 ' I .ri i• 1 1{ /„111 1 ,/, ■• , I '�IIn I , 'Ir , #l1�'' ! I ��,l p•� yr1'I11;1r� I I I 1 1p ,1i I / e / ll' l .`1 Z 1 4,111 1 1 I ; I C!lij i�,►,11111 I ( ( ' %iif i j� I ��� —il I)�' i 1 I `/ �c I f E! Ih�',!'1!I�1 I �`� 1 �!� 11,,' , sr � ' 11 1 1\ � ( � ‘r \■\ . ; 1 lid 1 \ lid! 1 '_ ) i1 1 f l;; I ,,•. .2.---•:.---- _ _--- --,-- __ --1 '{.1'! •I.r ,: ‘..11,,,.w„ 1 ^ j I f 1 , , „' `•� ----- , it..- •-ii : i ,,,,,,:‘,. . t\' I ik f 1 t � / v I crx i „ 1 / y � i r I 1r r 'i ii. cr . �� I' r�� — jl,�, iIIIN�I 'I,/ ,',:, r 11 1 ,- I oi��;r, �.,. ! i „�_ . r' ? j . , i ,I 1,I., fi. 1' :,,,,,ii. ,",/f ,.11` , 1 I ; . i 1 ... . , ,r,...,*,,,,,, ii,.. ,„ i: :1. I: t: i, „ „ ; , . ,, 41, :l i II';;'.j' { (IiI+ ' 11_1 1 -71 'mayL ' { 4'i'4 111 R ”' tr•-r "► ,Ii AIt U II I- i i17;Iiri' i 1 f i i ,, ,i cif \ I 7.Ot 4H. ' 4 a!;.1,--',">1.",-.,-,',:".'.2,..'1 . 1 i.-•�.-.�,.•:,:\:j.. 1' \f \ , ,;iari/.iii ":,-z.;',$,..-',•••- 4-..\ ; �i _.S ••• ;;D I i o .Sti S5'a'5 .4,y 8 \% !fey z. <.,, •• F. it c �/ ova• :I,, ' 4,.<:4?-/-:;.. ��� •s •. I $ t3 ,! � A " " � ': °' f + rfi! o 2 = . -49..„' '• ,,` , i.,. :: WU a ; iv 14, °+ '(-.4,4:. `` IjL� : _ I 4 .am f f:! / . i,, j i + Y / r `[ �. y f�-x / y // 44 tt m n tI 1 -- r$ G ,- ncf,,' .> 1 r „,...,,44r• *N- a Qi t`a�r $(7;�/ J ;-Y* �/'7 X54,3e�� .1c. t• i,14 �wi'%k�S>yF iya / Z 7C II�/y. l.t+' tIr _•x'.:),V., # 1 1'ii I Z O I 1 F,t/77/f/aa\ ( Fy.- /r,�(r• ) 11 s fi ' i 3�n /f /s CD "T1 I � Il10 �Yly '�'i' ��9 4 . 1 et I= III <� ./r� . ,, • j.. fst 4 ,,,:';!y?,;:-:! 1 r �'/ l �, out , , ._, ,f\ .1'Si .".. :,..".46,-, — ...., t s •s,, ��� � � f •m ,1 1 v. .r”• . .., 4, *9 •• L'!3 i i s- I � •• �1 • �i!tl !' f Ar _■ t 91 1 •/ .i • L � ' 4, •t , .1 1 r t 1 L. a I :4. /4) ;),/,/,/ s, 4,40 , ,:.2 pi 1 )1 1 i I e .V /,, i • 1 • ..1,, 8.\,, s...- ‘,.. ,..,-I, flak ..._ ,/1 1 1 r • Ilk..;.„,,,i1...., „...,, ..... ,...z.v,,,,, ea ., ,..„...)/ I: I ,. ..40. g-1 ii i ____, rtitt,-- - %loci /Pi/144ft J -I i --- - . , 1114 "/ ' I ( (4111- --1-&---:_-_ _ _ ;1141--TI, viiN l 1 ill y ith, .. III : ..... . .... „,.....___....._ . __ .___.,10 ..i, ....._ . Ilk ..any-- ----- ---,=-------444 7,-; ;;;-------'.. 1---"-z-,"-74'4'.---.."""' , 0 - - N IP\ -- -- 7 qv, ,,,,,,r(bi! //i '•• N.I. if • • • • • ! s• • 1. 1 1 • % r .:11111„.\\\ 1 1 .%' • '<s• ,.. /;iiir;_ %.(,::114),s1 1,:s :1):/1,11;1 il At• .t. 'c/ 'I';------ , '' ''\, * '--- 1:: I \\..... itr :1::::, s 4,11,p,.., „.,.....;:: ,), ,k•-■_,, . K. 14,.. _ s,, , ..„_ 1011 0/- •-,"• ;-' ; \ i _ ' * -•4 4 lir: : ".-- / ''/ . ! j I ? - --- Pi __ : VIII ' i 14 "*. kiii, , -- ,,...4 - I 1 • \' ' ' ." 1 4 i : ,,/ ;" ..e 11 ; 1 t( ,,;,....,..t)., 1 i i si ,A , 1 AC44, •„,,,,,,,tt, , / 1, /21 , .• , l'?"'?*' •":. N /,./;,,,0/40, • • 4_4411 /1 ' I ituat 6 8.... i 1 EU9 CC 11J $ -..... it W - i r 1 I 1 it 1 I /',----7 ,- — ----'------- ) -41— 4'---- 1 \(*(p4-41-14.5t7E-•+.5g.'' lic,/ il.i• I sk,ko ,w/; yiks s,Aw/ / /- :' liurkk. ..k 7, 11 II; . i 1 I i - - "1—1 IIIIRMII111111•11•1111■111111 ' : 'III s s ''‘`■\'1 AW.-- \ , .. '- C— Sim.-...r.ra---..----.74-------,, : ill illfilifiiii ' / z ir..-', .,-- it, iirloil* / : ! ii , svamatmalimpawkialfrAmamm-_____--,;--, --- ! ,„„, - ...,...„--„,--,_, _-_--,--- ,fi T ,,.. I Ng '.:' .......:WI- n.,*-- 471. - iii,e41TE .. , 1//,,- - , ___ =-•,-;.,, __ 1 I 11:14:-:: : .1. '; - 11,,-‘,:• - -... • t 1 lf ii ,,,4___Ilf) I I ! t ffi , -1, • • 1 I c... \\ ,,.,\ f ./...-- 3,4,11-07#ii r-,1, — i I,. -- :i' •,,,- ..;_ .,, 41jI a 4, I if: 1 II II ' N ,. :•:: .:.i,..- .. .;-i,/,\ t.,,t,#* -_-: ..?'4 A, ._• \--,7,:‘,,s, , i I , i U 1 1 A R - a 1 il,,. .: :1 . :::.• • . tr(,/ c, ••</-•;":; ' k t( \) 1 c t.1:; It,' :i:i :.:::-.:::".::...r;: i. gip. i.,..:?:...;::::..,....:.: • r. , ,-./..plit,1, 1 .;,/‘; '-k,,,i '. i 1 ie.rd', :::.... :. I .-- \-tie lt , .„-". .0' ,',/ ---: -- II ,41 .':/if::: i.,444,'' -ir Ist,_ :1 q •',,, ,..,-'- 411\,.1 si 11 :/,',71.11:L0,40 Avi"/— ,.--N— 1 -01 _ ;-' / . ..,., , ''' .:!,3'.r.:.0..:•:::::? .:: .. . „ 4, i'',: 4.1:: t :• .: ) L.,,,..— _ • • „,„ .... ,.. . (.,Ak. :-- i,,_ qh. 4 __ , ■4, ' -- i I III I: I I !, •.',,lp,"::;11::1 l'::- fH ,• -:4 ft,,, •.1”.7.-,..-11:11' IP, ' " / : / • :I I I 1 1 P .1t'l 1 tr:41 it 1 .1-Sc%Zi: % -,;$7--..) • / / / / /.I,)- I Is i 1 ; ; i ‘ i / 1 •4 1 gi 1 '.7-'"".f.l. 01%,&, .411 I'''.1.1:..1.• ...:: .: i 1 /.: / " '. Olt I - I I :.4 ill f IlIA ‘.:1,".i."• - ,5;1411- ,: \ I' !II:1..411,11(i -: j it !-1' 1% q(1=- -- b , A , iii 1 Jil .:/. i :':.. „'-',1":- ., Z7- ° - -11,- , ill 1 . ,,,,,,;$ J. , : . i. . .;sas,„„ I igt I I; 1 tit ik:','..,1, : ..:,. t. ...i;:i„;,-,; ,-,'”, :Fr. I • •,,,,i,,,,pa •-.-.: 14..,,,,-,,,,,' 1 ,,\' I , ,I i it 1 i : 1 3 0 .17 V ,':4 I ::::1 '74 1 1 I I I' -.7.011■,:- ag), I 14 .!;.:‘, t...ir.: t .); ; ii • 11 . IV , I,: sisN, Ili \\ ill ■I 1 6' •.;.,P,.1.' ,. :(..:: .1, ..rt.. 1 1 \ ' ,, 'V- ,- \ • ,,z.,, $,, if! • 'I lit g Iiii : ; , -.,gi ■ ri kis i E :::::: -.., l'I'V• .% \ \ 'I', ' qu, \ \ . . is 1 I th _ Li: I 1,. ,„,..„,.......„., k, 1 ‘1-e#It's% '. t i.. '...*:\ '.." , -.11.i 7. ....1. ''..."# ..':. , :ss's sr,',t;Is' It_ if,fir- ,,eo... ...._ ,.. ._ _...- : • ... - ,..,,, & _ \. t.,I r a t&Iell 7,:••.1Wirli"Z.,:.. ..,.....c...,,„,. .---7: r... ......,,,.„ ..... N.N. ''''..V.!Rt.\\ \t .,, \ k 3e NI II tau v l-v$4,14 / ») i 09/01/95 11:26 EAGAN MICE FAC 3 CITY HALL NO.403 P002/002 jsi 1771 YANKEE DOODLE ROAD �EAGAN, MINNESOTA 55121 41^' Q, 612.454-5882 13• c• August 22, 1995 Advisory Planning Commission 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55122 ATTN: Mr. E.J. VanOverbeke, City Clerk Re: Blue Cross/Blue Shield-Rezoning 52.55 Acres. River Park Center Mr. Chairman & Members: I write this letter as I am unable to attend your meeting this evening regarding the above matter. I spoke to Mr. Chuck Hall, who consults with Blue Cross/Blue Shield, and advised Mr. Hall of my concerns. 1. I love the woods and ask that it be kept in tact as much as is humanly possible, that replanting be done so as to maintain its present general condition. 2. I have a very deep concern regarding the proposed cul-de-sac at the end of Yankee Doodle Road. With the cul-de-sac and removal of the island at the entrance into our area, we will again be faced with the tour buses, semi-trucks, double semi-trucks, etc. running over our shrubs, small trees, underground sprinkler system, etc. Before final plans are made, I request that we neighbors have a chance to express to Blue Cross/Blue Shield what our problems are so that we can work through whatever problems may exist. Sincerely e M. C. Greaser 1771 Yankee Doodle Road Eagan MN 55121 MCG: 1gl cc: Transport America: Jim Aronson Bob Myers (9- R-96% 612 681 4300 09-01-95 11 26AM P002 #13 Agenda Information Memo September 5, 1995 Eagan City Council Meeting F. DELOSH ADDITION - PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: 1. To approve or deny the Preliminary Subdivision for DeLosh Addition for 13 lots on 9.9 acres in the SE 1/4 of Section 4 located north of Skyline Drive, south of Highview Terrace and west of Highview Park. FACTS: • The Advisory Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on this proposed Preliminary Subdivision at its regular meeting on July 25, 1995. The Commission recommends approval of the Preliminary Subdivision subject to conditions. • The neighbors have petitioned the Environmental Quality Board (EQB) to prepare an Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) for the proposed storm sewer project through the ravine. Staff has not been informed by the EQB as to the validity of the EAW request . ISSUES: • The item was continued at the July 25, 1995 Advisory Planning Commission Meeting in order for the developer to hold a neighborhood meeting. That meeting was held on August 16, 1995. Approximately 25 residents attended the meeting. . BACKGROUND/ATTACHMENTS: (2) Minutes of Planning o ission - pas r rough/T7 Staff Report- pages � 5 (through /7 1 3 MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE EAGAN ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION EAGAN, MINNESOTA AUGUST 22, 1995 DELOSH ADDITION Chairman Miller opened discussion regarding a Preliminary Subdivision (DeLosh Addition) consisting of 13 single family lots on 9.9 acres located south of Highridge Terrace and north of Skyline Road, in the SE'/4 of Section 4. Chairman Miller reminded the Commission that this item was heard at the July 25, 1995, APC meeting, during which the public hearing was closed and the Commission discussion was continued to this meeting to allow the applicant time to facilitate a neighborhood meeting. Miller stated that it is his understanding that the differences between the applicant and the neighboring residents are still substantially the same. Planner Tyree advised the APC that the neighborhood meeting was held on August 16, 1995, and that 24 people attended, plus staff members. Ms. Tyree explained that the neighboring residents still have concerns regarding the condition of the ravine after the public improvement project for the storm drainage, the amount of tree removal, the street connection of Highridge Terrace to Skyline Drive, a concern regarding the upgrading of the streets in the future and its affects on the residents, and the variance for the "flag" lots (Lots 5, 6 and 10). <-?‘ Page 2 August 22, 1995 ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION Chairman Miller again explained that the public hearing was closed at the July 1995 meeting and that the matter is back to the Commission for discussion. Member Isberg inquired with City Engineer Mike Foertsch as to whether Condition No. 12 regarding erosion control requires the developer to address the storm drainage in the ravine. Engineer Foertsch advised that the ravine erosion will be addressed with the public improvement project by the City and will be the City's responsibility and that Condition No. 12 addresses the general erosion control measures required as with any property development. Member Carlson inquired as to whether staff researched the issue of whether the ravine area is "legally protected" as raised by a resident during the July 1995 APC meeting. City Attorney Dougherty stated that the City acquired an easement within the _ ravine for drainage and such easement does have restrictions; however, there is no evidence that the area is "protected" for or as a wildlife preserve or the like. Member Heyl acknowledged that the neighbors concerns still exist after the neighborhood meeting but that the staff addressed each and every one of those concerns and therefore she favors the proposal. Member Heyl explained that the issue of the storm drainage within the ravine should not stop the development of the subject property; the proposed tree removal is well below the allowable tree removal percentage; safety concerns and issues support making Highridge Terrace as a through street to Skyline Drive; and the variance on the minimum 85-foot lot width requirement is not inconsistent with the intent of the requirement in light of the fact that the location of the house will be set well back from the street and the area in which the house is to be located complies with the width and lot size. Member Miller advised that he spoke with the City Forester who assured him that the tree preservation plan will be monitored for compliance and further noted that the tree preservation policy of the City is merely a policy and not a ordinance that has the affect of law. Member Segal moved, Member Hey! seconded, a motion to recommend approval of the Preliminary Subdivision (DeLosh Addition) consisting of 13 single family lots on 9.9 acres located south of Highridge Terrace and north of Skyline Road, in the SE1/4 of Section 4. A member from the audience inquired as to whether the public may be heard. Chairman Miller limited public comment to any individual who did not speak at the July 1995 APC meeting. A resident of 1470 Highview Avenue advised the Commission of the following: (1) that a Petition will be filed with the Environmental Protection Board regarding the proposed development on the subject pr rty; (2) inquired as to whether lr Page 3 August 22, 1995 ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION any APC members were aware of any other body which had jurisdiction over that of the City with respect to the development of the subject property; (3) if so, the name of any such body be made known; and (4) advised as to the neighboring residents intent to contact other State agencies and State Legislators regarding the development of the ravine area. Member Isberg opined that the filing of a petition with the Environmental Protection Board does not effect the APC in moving ahead and making its decision. All members approved in favor a motion to recommend approval of the Preliminary Subdivision (DeLosh Addition) consisting of 13 single family lots on 9.9 acres located south of Highridge Terrace and north of Skyline Road, in the SE1/4 of Section 4, subject to the following conditions: _ Standard Conditions 1. The developer shall comply with these standard conditions of plat approval as adopted by Council on February 3, 1993: Al, B1, B2, B3, B4, Cl, C2, C4,D1, El, Fl, Gi, and H1. Platting 2. That the subdivision be platted. Aircraft Noise 3. Architectural designs and construction methods for new construction within the development will incorporate sound attenuation standards sufficient to achieve an interior sound level of 45 dBA. 4. A notice will be recorded on each lot indicating that it is located within Metropolitan Council Aircraft Noise Zone IV. Parks and Recreation 5. This development shall be subject to a cash parks dedication. 6. This development shall be subject to a cash trails dedication. Water Quality 7. The development be subject to a cash dedication for water quality. Tree Preservation 8. Tree Protective Measures (i.e. 4 foot polyethylene laminate safety netting be installed at the Drip Line or at the perimeter of the Critical Root Zone,"whichever is greater, of the significant trees/woodlands to be preserved. / 1`O t Page 4 August 22, 1995 ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION 9. The developer contact the City Forestry Division at least five days prior to the issuance of a grading permit to ensure compliance with the approved Tree Preservation Plan. 10. An Individual Lot Tree Preservation Plans will be required for Lot 6, Block 1. Wells/Septic 11. The developer shall abandon any existing wells or septic tank systems not proposed to be utilized by the development in accordance with the City and County requirements. Erosion Control 12. The developer will be responsible for installing and maintaining erosion control measures in accordance with the City's erosion/sediment control standards. Storm Sewer 13. The developer shall be responsible for extending and connecting the proposed storm sewer line from Highridge Terrace to the proposed 24 inch trunk storm sewer to be installed as identified in the Comprehensive Storm Water Management Plan (1990). 14. The installation of trunk storm sewer in accordance with the City's Comprehensive Storm Water Management Plan(1990) in required with this development. Utilities 15. Sanitary sewer to serve Lots 2, 3, 4, 5, Block 2 shall be constructed along the south side of Lots 2, 3,4, Block 2 north of Sibley Hills Drive. Streets/Access/Easements. 16. The developer will be required to remove the existing concrete curb and gutter to obtain access to Skyline Road. - 17. Any driveway, roadway section or utility installed by developer or subsequent property owners on Bridgeview Terrace public right-of-way shall be considered private with the City assuming no responsibility for its construction or maintenance. All approved in favor. ( c7 PLANNING REPORT CITY OF EAGAN REPORT DATE: July 18, 1995 CASE: 4-PP-22-6-95 APPLICANT: Wayne Brekken HEARING DATE: July 25, 1995 PROPERTY OWNER: Wayne Brekken PREPARED BY: Shannon Tyree REQUEST: Preliminary Subdivision - DeLosh Addition LOCATION: North of Skyline Road, south of Highridge Terrace in the SE 1/4 of Sec. 4 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: D-I Single Family Residential (0-3 units/acre) ZONING: R-1 Single Family SUMMARY OF REQUEST Wayne Brekken is requesting a Preliminary Subdivision to allow 13 single family residential lots on 9.9 acres in the SE 1/4 of Section 4; located north of Skyline Drive, south of Highview Terrace and west of Highview Park. AUTHORITY FOR REVIEW City Code Section 13.20 Subd. 6 states that "In the case of platting, the Planning Commission and the Council shall be guided by criteria, including the following, in approving, denying or establishing conditions related thereto:" A. That the proposed subdivision does comply with applicable City Code provisions and the Comprehensive Guide Plan. B. That the design or improvement of the proposed subdivision complies with applicable plans of Dakota County, State of Minnesota, or the Metropolitan Council. C. That the physical characteristics of the site including but not limited to, topography, vegetation,susceptibility to erosion and siltation,susceptibility to flooding, water storage, and retention are such that the site is suitable for the type of development or use contemplated. D. That the site physically is suitable for the proposed density of the development. E. That the design of the subdivision or the proposed improvements is not likely to cause environmental damage. / , e/ Planning Report - Wayne Brekken July 25, 1995 Page 2 F. That the design of the subdivision or the type of improvements is not likely to cause health problems. G. That the design of the subdivision or the improvements will not conflict with easements of record or with easements established by judgement of court. H. That completion of the proposed development of the subdivision can be completed in a timely manner so as not to cause an economic burden upon the City for maintenance, repayment of bonds or similar burden. I. That the subdivision has been properly planned for possible solar energy system use within the subdivision or as it relates to adjacent property. (Refer to City Handbook on Solar Access). J. That the design of public improvements for the subdivision is compatible and consistent with the platting or approved preliminary plat on adjacent lands. K. That the subdivision is in compliance with those standards set forth in that certain document entitled "City of Eagan Water Quality Management Plan for the Gun Club Lake Watershed Management Organization" which document is properly approved and filed with the office of the City Clerk hereinafter referred to as the "Water Quality Management Plan". Said document and all of the notations, references and other information contained therein shall have the same force and effect as if fully set down herein and is hereby made a part of this Chapter by reference and incorporated herein as fully as if set forth herein at length. It shall be the responsibility of the City Clerk to maintain the Water Quality Management Plan and make the same available to the public. BACKGROUND/HISTORY No prior development has occurred on this site. EXISTING CONDITIONS The property is characterized by a steep and wooded ravine runs through the site fom southeast to northwest. The property is located within the Metropolitan Council's airport planning Noise Zone IV. In this Noise Zone,in-fill residential development is not prohibited. It is important to apply performance standards which will minimize indoor noise transmission and ensure notification of noise exposure to prospective future owners. SURROUNDING USES The following existing uses, zoning, and comprehensive guide plan designations surround the subject property: / Planning Report - Wayne Brekken July 25, 1995 Page 3 North - Single family homes; zoned R-1, guided D-I. South - Single Family homes; zoned R-1; guided D-I. East - Highview Park & Single family homes; guided P & R-1; designated P and D-I. West - Single family homes; zoned R-1; guided D-I. EVALUATION OF REOUEST Preliminary Subdivision The site is zoned and guided for low density residential. The developer is proposing a 13 lot subdivision that will be consistent with both those plans. Density The proposed net density of the project is 1.31 units/acre. Lots The 13 lots range in size from 12,434 s.f to 107,252 s.f and average 33,194. Setbacks The site has been designed to accommodate typical R-1 zoning requirements. Tree Preservation, The site is approximately 75% wooded with a variety of upland decidious trees, with the remainder of the site classified as open grass areas. A steep, wooded ravine runs through the site from the southeast to the northwest. According to the developer/owner this ravine area is undevelopable and will be left as is. Existing significant vegetation, as indicated on the submitted Tree Inventory, consists of 262,358 square feet of significant woodland. This woodland consists of a mixture of decidious trees including boxelder, birch, cottonwood, elm, and oak. As proposed the development will result in the removal of approximately 31,000 square feet of significant woodland (12% of the total existing significant woodland). This woodland removal will occur throughout the site with the exception of Lot 6, Block 1. Woodland /tree removal for this lot will occur as the particular lot is developed. An Individual Lot Tree Preservation Plan will be required for this lot at the time of building/grading permit application. The developer has proposed grading the entire area, with the exception of the above mentioned Lot 6 Block 1, to be developed at one time. The Tree Preservation Policy was originally set up to deal with development on a two-phase process. The first phase would include initial site grading and installation of utilities. During this phase, 25%of the existing significant vegetation is allowed to be removed without mitigation. The second phase would include development of individual lots. A 20% removal of the remaining significant tree/woodland resource is allowed during this phase without mitigation. Staff is recommending tree preservation issues of this particular development be considered in an entire site phase, with all the tree preservation/removal matters considered at the time of initial development. Allowable tree removal, when considered in one phase, calculates to 40.0% of the existing vegetation. Therefore, allowable significant woodland removal calculates to 104,943 square feet.. No tree/woodland removal will be allowed after this initial development. 690 Planning Report - Wayne Brekken July 25, 1995 Page 4 Because the significant woodland removal of 12% is less than the allowable limit, there is no mitigation for this development. Staff is recommending approval of the Tree Preservation Plan as submitted. r n - The preliminary grading plan as presented is acceptable and shows that a relatively small portion of the site will be disturbed by the grading required to prepare the site for the street, house, and driveway construction. The area proposed for Lot 6 is in the location of an old farm site. Any existing wells or septic systems not proposed to be utilized by the development that are located anywhere within this development shall be plugged and abandoned according to the City and County requirements. The developer shall provide detailed plans and specifications for any retaining wall to be constructed as part of the development. The development will be responsible for installing and maintaining erosion control measures in accordance with the City's erosion/sediment control standards. Water quality and wetlands. This development is located in Drainage Basin H and will generate stormwater that will discharge to bottomlands along the Minnesota River. Because of the absence of any designated downstream recreational water bodies, the low density of the development, and the fact that there are no good ponding locations within the site, staff recommends a cash dedication for this development. While there are jurisdictional wetlands within the proposed subdivision, none lie within the areas proposed for grading and construction. Storm Drainage - The City's Comprehensive Storm Water Management Plan (1990) identifies a 24-inch trunk storm sewer to be constructed from Pond HP-1 through the proposed DeLosh Addition, through Sibley Hills Drive with ultimate discharge into the west ditch of Trunk Highway 13. Runoff would be directed through an existing culvert under Trunk Highway 13 and into the Minnesota River Valley. The developer shall petition the City to include this trunk storm sewer work through the site as part of a City public improvement project and it must be approved by the City Council prior to final plat approval. Previous runoff has caused erosion through the area and this storm sewer will minimize further erosion through the site. The developer shall dedicate the appropriate drainage and utility easement through the site for this future storm sewer project. The proposed storm sewer line serving Highridge Terrace to the west shall be extended to connect to the proposed 24 inch trunk storm sewer. Utilities -The preliminary utility plan as presented is acceptable with a few modifications. Lots 5, 6, 10, Block 2 are proposed to be greater than one acre (43,560 square feet). City code does K Planning Report - Wayne Brekken July 25, 1995 Page 5 not require that lots of this size be connected to City sanitary sewer and water service. However, the developer proposes connection of sanitary sewer and water service for these lots to City mains. Lots 6 & 10, Block 2 will require pumping of the sanitary sewer service because City sanitary sewer of sufficient depth is not readily available. Sanitary sewer and water main is readily available and proposed to be extended from Skyline Road to the north to service Lots 1, 2, 3, Block 1 and Lots 7, 8, 9 Block 2 of Highridge Terrace. Sanitary sewer and water main is not readily available to service Lot 1,Block 2. The developer is proposing that sanitary sewer be extended approximately 250 feet from Sibley Hills Drive to the northwest corner of the site to serve this lot. The preliminary utility layout also proposes water service be extended from the intersection of Bridgeview Terrace and Bridgeview Avenue to serve Lot 1, Block 2. In the event that the developer wishes to include this work as part of a City public improvement project, the developer must petition the City for this work. If the developer does petition the City to include it as part of a public improvement, the project must be approved prior to final plat approval. Sanitary sewer shall not be extended as shown to serve Lots 2, 3, 4, 5, Block 2. The preliminary utility plan shows the extension down the west edge of Lot 2 and along the backyards of Lots 2 - 4. Sanitary sewer shall be extended along the south edge of Lots 2, 3, 4, Block 2, north of Sibley Hills Drive to provide access for potential maintenance purposes. Streets/Access-The preliminary street layout as presented is acceptable with a few modifications. The developer proposes to extend Highridge Terrace to the south to connect with Skyline Road providing access to Lots 1, 2, 3, Block 1 and Lots 7, 8, 9, 10, Block 2 onto Highridge terrace. The developer will be required to remove concrete curb to provide access onto Skyline Road or Highridge Terrace. Lots 2 - 6, Block 2 are proposed to take driveway access directly onto Sibley Hills Drive. Lot 1, Block 2 is proposed to take access onto Bridgeview Terrace. The portion of Bridgeview Terrace between the site and Bridgeview Avenue is currently an unmaintained gravel, rural section with numerous trees on thirty-feet of City right-of-way. Any driveway,roadway section or utility placed within this thirty-feet of City right-of-way shall be considered private with the City taking no responsibility for its construction or maintenance. The developer shall enter into an access agreement regarding Bridgeview Terrace with the City prior to final plat approval. Easements/Right-of-Way/Permits -The developer must provide sixty-feet of right-of-way for the extension of Highridge Terrace to Skyline Road south of the site. Parks and Recreation This proposed development is located within Park Service District 4. Highview Park is located immediately to the east of the site. Staff is recommending a cash park dedication and a cash trail dedication for this development. )(..e4r1— Planning Report - Wayne Brekken July 25, 1995 Page 6 Compatibility with Surrounding Area The area is completely surrounded by low density residential. Developing the property as low density single family residential is consistent with the already existing residential area that completely surrounds this site. SSUMMARY/CONCLUSION The subdivision meets the required findings for subdivison apporval listed on pages 1 and 2 of the staf report. ACTIONS TO BE CONSIDERED To recommend approval or denial of the requested Preliminary Subdivision for DeLosh Addition of 12 single family lots on 9.5 acres. If approval of the plat is recommended it shall be subject to the following conditions: Standard Conditions 1. The developer shall comply with these standard conditions of plat approval as adopted by Council on February 3, 1993: Al, B1, 82, B3, 84, Cl, C2, C4, D1, El, F1, GI, and HI. platting 2. That the subdivision be platted. Aircraft Noise 3. Architectural designs and construction methods for new construction within the development will incorporate sound attenuation standards sufficient to achieve an interior sound level of 45 dBA. 4. A notice will be recorded on each lot indicating that it is located within Metropolitan Council Aircraft Noise Zone IV. Parks and Recreation 5. This development shall be subject to a cash parks dedication. 6. This development shall be subject to a cash trails dedication. Water Quality 7. The development be subject to a cash dedication for water quality. Tree Preservation 8. Tree Protective Measures (i.e. 4 foot polyethylene laminate safety netting be installed at the Drip Line or at the perimeter of the Critical Root Zone, whichever is greater, of the significant trees/woodlands to be preserved. / (P 3 Planning Report - Wayne Brekken July 25, 1995 Page 7 9. The developer contact the City Forestry Division at least five days prior to the issuance of a grading permit to ensure compliance with the approved Tree Preservation Plan. 10. An Individual Lot Tree Preservation Plans will be required for Lot 6, Block 1. Wells/Septic 11. The developer shall abandon any existing wells or septic tank systems not proposed to be utilized by the development in accordance with the City and County requirements. erosion Control 12. The developer will be responsible for installing and maintaining erosion control measures in accordance with the City's erosion/sediment control standards. Storm Sewer 13. The developer shall be responsible for extending and connecting the proposed storm sewer line from Highridge Terrace to the proposed 24 inch trunk storm sewer to be installed as identified in the Comprehensive Storm Water Management Plan (1990). 14. The installation of trunk storm sewer in accordance with the City's Comprehensive Storm Water Management Plan (1990) in required with this development. Utilities 15. Sanitary sewer to serve Lots 2, 3, 4, 5, Block 2 shall be constructed along the south side of Lots 2, 3, 4, Block 2 north of Sibley Hills Drive. • Streets/Access/Easements 16. The developer will be required to remove the existing concrete curb and gutter to obtain access to Skyline Road. 17. Any driveway, roadway section or utility installed by developer or subsequent property owners on Bridgeview Terrace public right-of-way shall be considered private with the City assuming no responsibility for its construction or maintenance. / (' K • STANDARD CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL A. Financial Obliaations • 1. This development shall accept its additional financial obligations as defined in the staffs report in accordance with the final plat dimensions and the rates in effect at the time of final plat approval. B. Easements and Rights-of-Wav 1. This development shall dedicate 10-foot drainage and utility easements centered over all lot lines and, in addition, where necessary to accommodate existing or proposed utilities for drainage ways within the plat. The development shall dedicate easements of sufficient width and location as _ determined necessary by engineering standards. 2. This development shall dedicate, provide, or financially guarantee the acquisition costs of drainage, ponding, and utility easements in addition to public street rights-of-way as required by the alignment, depth, and storage capacity of all required public utilities and streets located beyond the boundaries of this plat as necessary to service or accommodate this development. 3. This development shall dedicate all public right-of-way and temporary slope easements for ultimate development of adjacent roadways as required by the appropriate jurisdictional agency. 4. This development shall dedicate adequate drainage and ponding easements to incorporate the required high water elevation plus three (3) feet as necessitated by storm water storage volume requirements. C. Plans and Specifications 1. All public and private streets, drainage systems and utilities necessary to provide service to this development shall be designed and certified by a registered professional engineer in accordance with City adopted codes, engineering standards, guidelines and policies prior to application for final plat approval. 2. A detailed grading, drainage, erosion, and sediment control plan must be prepared in accordance with current City standards prior to final plat approval. . _ 3. This development shall ensure that all dead-end public streets shall have a cul-de-sac constructed in accordance with City engineering standards. i6r 4. A separate detailed landscape plan shall be submitted overlaid on the proposed grading and utility plan. The financial guarantee for such plan shall be included in the Development Contract and shall not be released until one year after the date of City certified compliance. D. Public Improvements 1. If any improvements are to be installed under a City contract, the appropriate project must be approved by Council action prior to final plat approval. E. Permits 1. This development shall be responsible for the acquisition of all regulatory agency permits required by the affected agency prior to final plat approval. F. Parks and Trails Dedication 1. This development shall fulfill its park and trail dedication requirements as recommended by the Advisory Parks, Recreation and Natural Resource Commission and approved by Council action. G. Water Quality Dedication 1. This development shall be responsible for providing a cash dedication, ponding, or a combination thereof in accordance with the criteria identified in the City's Water Quality Management Plan, as recommended by the Advisory Parks, Recreation and Natural Resource Commission and approved by Council action. H. Other 1. All subdivision, zoning and other ordinances affecting this development shall - be adhered to, unless specifically granted a variance by Council action. Advisory Planning Commission City Council Approved: August 25, 1987 September 15, 1987 Revised: July 10, 1990 Revised: February 2, 1993 USN STANDARD.CON • ( 6 FINANCIAL OBLIGATION - Delosh Addition There are pay-off balances of special assessments totaling $37,472 on the parcel for which the conditional use is requested. At this time, there are no pending assessments on the parcel for which the conditional use permit is requested. The estimated financial obligation presented is subject to change based upon areas, dimensions and land uses contained in the final plat. Based upon the study of the financial obligations collected in the past and the uses proposed for the property, the following charges are proposed. The charges are computed using the City's existing fee schedule and the connections proposed to be made in the City's utility system based on the submitted plans. Improvements Use Rate Quantity Amount Water Trunk S.F. $835.00/lot 12 Lots $10,020 Storm Sewer Trunk S.F. .076/sq. ft. (0386,022 sq. ft. 29,338 TOTAL $39.358, (1) If storm sewer ponding easement is granted to City this area may be reduced. i (e 7 7 I apt"' i A .V1�` ?S--.BSI in co I W�• t 1 • �"AV . = .� . PARK 1I ' i 8 CO NTRY o 1 ' - ' 41, 1/47.c., WEST r ,��'� I W I 5 1.1.' 0 1 RAWE ��~^ Z VP' ■ I� < i j -- ,_ Q- _ < KNOe�a liCIP 1 � ARK J ANA L 126 • ADOW VIEW RD Q ALA •�� F ;. TOwERVEw RD. ' µPQ •s' �� I >� �e E. :.- : -1 , OAKS �� 1 •, •Oil' ,yam!_. _ J 'cP .• ETENOR:�E ' 0k ��y p •1 • ` I ZIP f--g-Q$ i i OUARRY .- I I �2' E uFF g, 2 7 PARK g1 Q ! 1 ,�. Z �� u 1 .. CT 1 L CENTURY I • L- _- PT YANKEE DOODLE ROAD I -L� WATER 1 1 U, OR I Town 777T"���� < P A �P TREATMEN �� .._ ' ' P0� ; FACLL.ITY IGHT o. a , I h ; y I CITY ® 6N ff ?�, O FACILITY < wow W'•''� ® ... I a' I w IROYAL i zI _If OAK •T b1 < b ASIq! r. DuC;w� s i . / iPir illiaEll . . L----... ....10 6,..4 N • ` MONTEREY L1{ I 1; i`t• - .-. •� �, - • ' KYlLO lN. J J c:Z:2)1 / :1g � - ca :� I 2# o I yt r J s I rat '�WK L E - ' E G , ROAD r ISH K . to 1 . •CqC+ A. <M "" C 1 . (T. _ 'f 1 •7 W < mono: 1 " ,- - �� •- '4...Cry � ; _� p ISI ,�� r ..if �,, C�7" 2 y ` 52 < • WAY g'M'" , • •��•. •'• • . - OCKY LA. K �qC,��� LITT R A. �'•'3 •A•K.A1 Ta•[I •C• r"") _a_ - I'` - l 1 LOCATION / 6 ±' ' •r - 1 f" .-• •,.. •• a!t r ft4/,o :...s D ;,...74.-..,,,,,,,,.,..,,i.-1 *,.. .1'4411111111 1.1.W.I &'Ll' .n. • . ir. BONING ;;,: oc_.... - ,, � R-1 (SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL) z L y _.: - �'_�"i T -! . ., � r y _,_a= ... -. ....104.zr 1.. .3„,41 • ,-1 k 15 r--1 = I.7/ Cie 01,,/i ni •' , �. \•• �� COI' w P � n _1�,h►� 4 :� J P L. . u.c Y'r J. - LPF �p ; ....___. ® R&D__ n` COMPREHENSIVE GUIDE PLAN ` D-I (SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL I �� 0-3 UNITS/ACRE) •roilit a / - - /ip Li ', *t...� CdV CF >< i , �elt�- Of DELOSH ADDITION VAI.I.Er VIEW PI ATTW �'t .•I'i....�....1nr.: ..-•I I -•-"-- m:. ' I --- 6 I - --II • ❑I • ' I <>. I , I I . I r..=IT- 11 \ ,1 I or I ..K. =1.. ' 1 \ \♦ VALLEY F' N 3.:a PI ATE A. PLAT 2 • I 1 \ I Io • 1 Ii \ � �i,�qf= \ 1 \,`� 1 \\ Q I ^.w 1 f T.1rt._ % 1 I • I 1 1• 1 1 i •L.y 1 1 1 - - 4� i ----_J 1 . '. 11 11 1 '�"!' 1 I I •LOCK•- 1 f._-a'a+c=,• • 1 1 II .. w —_ LarJ`-2--I`-me"I.--Ter "VI"' 1 1 1 1 I. 1 ».... 1 .......... - ■ j 111 Ir7 114,00...r �`� L '�••l-s..-1 I.,}��t L.�'_11470-___''`\\ �i� It •-t-- 1 1 ',�-,_. 1 I i I..r.._ 'I'`.�S.w..� I L •/ /....# / I ' 1 PRETT'YMAN 11E101113 I HELL!N AI'!NT!L41 • f TPrr n.E ACRES -1 • •1 tr./ 4Y" • flit. M.GYMi ..-I.r n.�• r- DELOSH ADDITION \ .al iA • \\`. \\--1 — ' — ♦\ ' / Ir \\♦\\ 1' Pillr Ivry/PICA TERN I / __~ --_1-i� ❑I . I O I s — _... - I •14111• 1. / ��/ O O 1ir 'TT _, C -1 / / 11 \\ \\ /ii 0" <() I I / �/�O it \// \\\ it//// Pr-7I/-Ir '-lr--=11 . //r it i It /// / 1� // II ' I r 1! `\"// 1 9,i I ri if 1-_J L. IL---.16---) .,,,,\, -\e":- - ..-_,_- 0 I \ 1 1 ll" E'er,-. 1 \ \ 111 I Ja..� ••%m _ - ` i� .��^ • DELOSH ADDITION -/'\r• '%" _'J —s \�,- '"! "11."' :. 1141 I - /" /fit= =..._ �,�: ) ..11 ';��i ,�: 1 i - -- -- `I 11; /`I•li, ----;,_,....;_.,:53.-,...,,,,, .,-..,-.,,,..7.„.....,:..A‘-4--- .2\\4''-.c".--',42!:'''''''''' 1') VII) ' 1 i4 1.4 -fliI(I I, _ / .tom -;F2,,%" :.. i•%�i � yam, ■g \ J7JL ; _ �`�•'.7 %,, - - II ' _ Is..•� _ _ �, psi =': -- �� `'� a/ I!`, a� \ 'fib \ \ i ( (,:.v.ra•tn•Now HMOS I ill ill I ~ -..... .1.1., ..,F....s- -♦.Y..•,•w W. �/ iNEIILE ACNfS • �� f uu tetrc.r �°O- _ w y. �.H t&• ta, • ,, .t 1 z — 0) i- "rii Z 1 Ike zi. ,; , ... . , , ,.,.... r ' f t I I n II I':i •�� J 41 I ; 1.:;11 1-\WI ' ILI° '. II."IV kl JfEi;1 z 1 1 Z. . ( x of y17,11 , H. D tr, ,_I ' t• ., Il'. , III ' r .CE Z ..1t','; , ,1s I I1 =.z, 1 `ail � _ V LU O O U. Q CC I ' -4,* "lie'1 I A a lk i 'II i GC (j 5 111<C >�; , ,'1 'r LL 1 co '�?p I , t ; . ` i1 I ' ems ! �c 1 ,t t, -o �. di. "TTTTT r::,-, 5 J , u't"' ' ' �i,� Z/.'1 ( 1147 ( _I Z • E.) - - ; � w( ir_aq° w • e. 91``7 a• I •.S��.�F�` _I-� I Z I I O-c- rk'r , Z i- 1".0 J ''him. -,,, -.® r. 1.�; -11 p;1 • I'ts� „ 'q44 o: ;1!� O O --0,1 ;i rig Z.i 4$ odor 1— 'A3 >o yr' _ 1 3 LL 9" O 0 CO O Q 1 ' �I } `R CL I II I •, .�, ;,;;SAO 1 0 Or C7 C_n I 1 1 71 = ' Q -----ss:-\sil I ,- ; ,- 1 . - . , I i; 0.N.,1 : , . 1 . '1;,, 17 s CC . •,77:‘,\.,•:,,i,� •�,� , - '. t • i 1 I • 01 '11. . . ; 1 t cell R °w . —_ .r _ • ~ e�i8 any 1',1 /��� . 7 d Z %� �# U`*��' ,� v• < 111'!\IAA 11P11 r. 1 1 • u oee !I : IIIIII1 ill• I . UJ � i 1 I. \ . Ai yq ', 5= /arc A\ i '..-4,: i • N1 1 Z I ! ,----t-1 1--t I '' �- O LL • I 7 • J— I' I,; /• �, Z a O ott 1. 1 ' 171, 1 \,'; I _/// • rl•1` 1•��Ji �w■ Q1. i1 ' ; . iii rt •141 4 I'1, / ! �, i�• ! mow '; Q �- v .J1+J 1 7j >< I W '� H Q a W .. • 7 1 I . .1.11. (r) D- ii.,..„ 0 ....... _ ' Ny s L_ I I I I • Nil. �. .. f, � ,:., . do--f.:�: : . :1 ::0 : : #i#:w :: ,. N \ • is • 0 9 - 1 ,, 11:::::::::::::::::'7::::::•:0:::.::::1 ' .31.1;1; ..::::::::::::::::: u •i..i1 _ _ ; : .: :i, , •. #�. — Cn I 1 I •:::•:::::::::: :::: •::•:....x._f - !!11 :: : • :� : :: ::....„., I I : : :: .lo :t • : : :: •t::: iv • . : • -- — — :: ;;: : '' / J 1:::.::::;;;:.:„.::: ::.:.:.:.::::::::::, • , l 1 4.::::::::::::::::::.:.::;::::i.::.:.:.:.: .....4„,... ..v>.s.g.,..4.44:-..z .....- r I ED - - _-:;▪ '---_ _ :: t: � ' . 1: a. mz 3v� SI I i:iri:::.:::::::::::::::::::i1::::::;:if:::::::::;:i..::::::i ...*:•., ” ..-- -.1 ° II :::::.iiii:::::::::: r.1::::::::::::::::i4,1*:::::11::::::::::: :11.7..=.5."ff: ..-- SI N -,,." M"any..is;�jj :cj,:• :/ w. — :1 •1 _,-15 ic.. Z i!.i . . 1 . 0 . 1 ! I II I . I I ; I I I 1; I• ::::::;:ii"::::::::::,:;::"":. •t OH 'o^.Y 15Ud 13 ___ _ ___ //: , / - , $40.00 per license CITY OF EAGAN X New 3830 Pilot Knob Road Renewal Eagan, MN 55122-1897 APPLICATION FOR LICENSE TO SELL TOBACCO PRODUCTS Please Print APPLICANT S I DCO, INC. Birthday Residential Address street city state zip Business Address 1574 University Avenue, St. Paul,MN 55104 street city state zip Home Phone 644-4501 Business Phone 454-7282 Business name in Eagan where tobacco is to be sold 1282 Town Center Drive Business address In Eagan where tobacco is to be sold Eagan, MN 55123 street TOBACCO PRODUCTS TO BE SOLD: (Check all that apply) "XX Cigarettes, cigars and other smoking tobacco Snuff, plug and other chewing tobacco Clippings, cuttings and sweepings suitable for chewing or smoking XX Pipes and other tobacco related devices Cigarette papers and wrappers PACKAGING OF TOBACCO PRODUCTS TO BE SOLD (Check all that apply) XX Individual pack or can Two or more packs or cans packaged together XX Full cartons LOCATION OF TOBACCO PRODUCTS WITHIN BUSINESS (Check all that apply) Self-service merchandise XX Over-the-counter Vending machine Number of vending machines within business XX Accessibie to store clerk only SEPARATE LICENSES SHALL BE ISSUED FOR THE SALE OF TOBACCO PRODUCTS AT EACH FIXED PLACE OF BUSINESS AND FOR EACH VENDING MACHINE. TOBACCO SALES TO ANY PERSON UNDER THE AGE OF EIGHTEEN (18)YEARS IS UNLAWFUL AND IS GROUNDS FOR SUSPENSION OR REVOCATION OF LICENSE. I (WE) HEREBY AGREE TO OPERATE SUCH BUSINESS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LAWS OF MINNESOTA AND THE ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF EAGAN. THE FOREGOING STATEMENTS ARE TRUE AND CORRECT TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF. DATE /7/y AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE a � ====c=====_____=====c=========c=========act=====_____ FOR OFFICE USE'ONLY City Council Approval Date: Date Issued: C* $40.00 per license CITY OF EAGAN -1 X New 3830 Pilot Knob Road Renewal Eagan, MN 55122-1897 APPLICATION FOR LICENSE TO SELL TOBACCO PRODUCTS Please Print APPLICANT Applebaum Companies, Inc. dba Big Top Birthday ResidenN Address Liquor s street city state zip Business Address 1574 University Avenue, St. Paul, MN 55104 street city state zip Home 1116164 Office 644-4501 Business Phone 454-7282 Business name in Eagan where tobacco is to be sold Big Top Liquors BusinessaddressinEaganwheretobaccoistobesold 3900 Beau dr Rue Drive, MN 55122 street TOBACCO PRODUCTS TO BE SOLD: (Check ill that apply) XX Cigarettes, cigars and other smoking tobacco Snuff, plug and other chewing tobacco Clippings, cuttings and sweepings suitable for chewing or smoking XX Pipes and other tobacco related devices Cigarette papers and wrappers PACKAGING OF TOBACCO PRODUCTS TO BE SOLD (Check all that apply) X Individual pack or can Two or more packs or cans packaged together X Full cartons LOCATION OF TOBACCO PRODUCTS WITHIN BUSINESS (Check all that apply) Self-service merchandise XX Over-the-counter Vending machine Number of vending machines within business XX Accessible to store clerk only SEPARATE LICENSES SHALL BE ISSUED FOR THE SALE OF TOBACCO PRODUCTS AT EACH FIXED PLACE OF BUSINESS AND FOR EACH VENDING MACHINE. TOBACCO SALES TO ANY PERSON UNDER THE AGE OF EIGHTEEN (18)YEARS IS UNLAWFUL AND IS GROUNDS FOR SUSPENSION OR REVOCATION OF LICENSE. I (WE) HEREBY AGREE TO OPERATE SUCH BUSINESS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LAWS OF MINNESOTA AND THE ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF EAGAN. THE FOREGOING STATEMENTS ARE TRUE AND CORRECT TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF. ! , DATE 1/7A5- AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE Q dew/ =B=====s==============================ssas=======saass=ssas FOR OFFICE USE ONLY City Council Approval Date: Date Issued: AUG-11-1995 1525 APERTUS TECHNOLOGIES. 612 828 0773 P.02403 1 CM OF E4GAN smarm HUNTING Puma REQUEST FOR THE PURPOSE OF WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT IMPORTlg dt>tuu'[`!ON 1�OR 7HE APPLICANT' NO i' . , DEER HOONIING WILL BE,PERMITTED apt during those epochal bunting seasons authorized by slie lacy Connell, •d controlled and conducted by tbe Department orNaturai Resources for wildlife management purposes.Applications roe •. 1 bunting permits will be considered for deer (bog hunting only), docks, geese and pheasant only on tercels of JCS.. •.. ti V • it.. ..II. Z u !r.+ •i !- •_ !i!s, •e 1 , . , J f k.. The max mum dates or the season for each wfldll b , •f.ted shall ebb:wide with the bunting dates established by the Minnesota Department or Natural Resources (DNR). The Ea •, Oty Counc2l may,at Its dtswetton,>rsdno*this samoe for euh raqueattd permit within the DNR season. The Eagan City - may deny any app leatlon for ipedel bunting If the permit does not serve the purposes of wildlife management, even If . applicant has complied with ally of the requirements. . , . ,1- , ,11, , , „ , , "1 ., . r u n 1.ti , .• lu 11• ■ -. • it i „ .. • - .� r ._ /I (1 2. , -, Address: : 3. City/State/Zip Code: ! C' coo//T 'y we-4f, .4", 6 � m .5.5-4 3 • y. 4. , perry Owaer�s Name (written permission from the property oweer must accompany this permit application): ,e0...v.5. ' petty Locathin Description: ,�J (eìe'A- / �,...)t _ T_. �;. , , r„___,..„._ _6. • of Game to be Hunted: 7. Specific Hunting Dates! gpcdh 0471 w4 i '74, - 0/95 - 1.34// 5-- i IDENTIFICATION OF ALL BUNTERS IN HUNTING PARTY ,. .._.__ L I:me(Beginning with the Applicant): 9. Address: 10.V Wclo Sil ' Al hiV fqi 5-r�r1lir 1/:ru41:. s�4 ,,,,r License# , . w 1 illiii„t 1 14 1 - ;once Approve/y,to: tq l (. U. City Cuuucil Approval Data 13. Erptrst:ob Dntee 11■111.• -__....■■.-..4 lakk.1.: • C , 1 [arms u.j.grin —, —, - ' post-c"'brans fax transmittal memo 757111 at Paged. 1, ,ij -,h '`"°n'iJutnt-, -. .. iilliMMONII6TENINIVINEM x1 Fix Cwt; TV? 612 828 0773 08-11-95 03:23PM P002 #12 AUG-11-1995 15:25 APERTUS TECHNOLOGIES. 612 828 0773 P.03/83 Thorsen-Cornwell Co. 5200 Wilkpn Rind • Suite 201 • Minneapolis.uirasasata b5424 rileol+on,t(512)51.7796 August 11, 1995 VIA FAX: 828-0773 Mr Shawn Hunter 4125 Country View Drive Eagan MIST 53123 To Whom It May Concern: Permission is granted for Shawn Hunter to bow- hunt deer on the Bieter farm at 35E and Diffley Road for the 1995 Bow season. Very truly yours, cr,d1A„.4000",# Ronald G. Cornwell Bieter Partner ui.Dbeamr I AYYOGatbn of Moms undom•Member-Wsnuals IWM Moueinp Aaeooa8on-Liziongsd goat Emu 6sokar-Regichned Prdipgb4Ono Eis 86r TOTAL P.03 R-99% 612 828 0773 08-11-95 03.23PM P003 #12 , 1 CITY OF EAGAN SPECIAL HUNTING PERMIT REQUEST FOR THE PURPOSE OF WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT IMPORTANT INFORMATION FOR THE APPLICANT NO FIREARM DEER HUNTING WILL BE PERMITTED except during those special hunting seasons authorized by the City Council,and controlled and conducted by the Department of Natural Resources for wildlife management purposes. Applications for special hunting permits will be considered for deer (bow hunting only), ducks, geese and pheasant only on parcels of property of five acres or more and zoned agricultural.commercial or industrial, The maximum dates of the season for each wildlife hunted shall coincide with the hunting dates established by the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (DNR). The Eagan City Council may,at its discretion,reduce the season for each requested permit within the DNR season. The Eagan City Council may deny any application for special hunting If the permit does not serve the purposes of wildlife management, even if the applicant has complied with all of the requirements. Any hunter listed in this application may hunt only when accomnaniedbvlhe applicant. •cony of this permit and anpronriate identification mustbe carried at all times for verification by the Eagan Police Department. L Name: 4/ i S,//'6,`- 2. Street Address: 3. City/State/Zip Code: /?f1 ,S44 Z ,tea-y / /7;44 , 5-5-42,2 -.. \ 11.x. 4. Pro Owner's Name (written permission from the property owner must accompany this permit application): ler- /-/�f� h?�1�`r`�►� /l/e w i'tct�, e 6906, eo c erers 5. Property Location Description: T/e, 44;-//wes71 c0A-n es-- S /n.eee ,ace f/ ,/ , v, /7-7 ; ,1 4er XeSotecews BOA ,Oer4 I 'J.,' 6. Type of Game to be Hunted: 7. Specific Hunting Dates: wx,- e /o-(/ Dr e� / // e / /�,l5 X ir■ IDENTIFICATION OF ALL HUNTERS IN HUNTING PARTY IC L Name (Beginning with the Applicant): 9. Address:` / 10.Vehicle Mt vn.o.... , SV/gee. /98 r /ta,/t #-+-v. License if Ch e/ 6(.-. e"--414-0-1-,e"--414-0-1-, / T !YPI/►e.55 r/"`,ef--, P)V7-2- Ala ce tG 01.--75,c-1 12. City Council Approval Date: 113. Expiration Date: August 9, 1995 - City of Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55122-1897 • RE: NORM SV/EN &•MIKE GUGGENBURGER - PERMISSION TO HUNT FOR DEER • By this letter we hereby grant permission for Norman Svien & Mike Guggenburger to Hunt on Gopher Resource Corporation's property. If you have any questions please feel free to call me. Thank you. Sincerely John apper • Plant Manager • GOPHER SMELTING I - REFINING COMPANY 3385 SOUTH HWY 149 EAGAN MN 55121-2395 PHONE 612 454 3310 • FAX 611 454 7 92 6 ' I 800 354.74,5.1 CITY OF EAGAN SPECIAL HUNTING PERMIT REQUEST FOR THE PURPOSE OF WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT IMPORTANT INFORMATION FOR THE APPLICANT NO FIREARM DEER HUNTING WILL BE PERMITTED except during those special hunting seasons authorized by the City Council,and controlled and conducted by the Department of Natural Resources for wildlife management purposes. Applications for special hunting permits will be considered for deer (bow hunting only), ducks, geese and pheasant only on parcels of property of five acres or more and zoned agricultural,commercial or industrial, The maximum dates of the season for each wildlife hunted shall coincide with the hunting dates established by the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (DNR). The Eagan City Council may,at its discretion,reduce the season for each requested permit within the DNR season. The Eagan City Council may deny any application for special hunting if the permit does not serve the purposes of wildlife management, even if the applicant has complied with all of the requirements. Any hunter listed in this application may hunt only when accompanied by the applicant. A copy of this permit and appropriate identification must be carried at all times for verification by the Eagan Police Department. 1. Name: 0-R-E-CrOR/Y 37b A 2r_A/ s dy Al I 2. Street Address: 3. City/State/Zip Code: ?3 ,S'v (A.71 N &1MILL 5`r 19\1k 1._ M N . .� c1 66— 4. Property Owner's Name (written permission from the property owner must accompany this permit application): PA-7-- --71i 0 644--7L--/i 5. Location cation Description: 1 -1 /�1GC,4-+e_- H ti 's F4i(firl /4-/- THE. E Al IS d F- b - Fizi.000D De.i Vt 6. Type of Game to be Hunted: 7. Specific Hunting Dates: bEek 03 1 B 0 l,03 s ep-r- it, (0,6-N5k) ( -LO5 G IDENTIFICATION OF ALL HUNTERS IN HUNTING PARTY 8. Name (Beginning with the Applicant): 9. Address: 10.Vehicle t' S. NS 3 8 3 u.-rt4 9'�m FfAC� S+, License#• 6_7_74/1.144._ ss7 os 36 L.PC, t•O Z� �"o k ►J' A v 5 (i)1in� I Th rrr'� vt/ _� ' ���Fif�S IF-- i t�A 3 SyZ� ONE-y JErirab (BROTHER) ri,t4-' ak:;.�p N+re15rbrNER b , ACES sit zz 30TH st, se ccseD) 11. Police Approval/Date: 12. City Council Approval Date: 13. Expiration Date: e . 1 forms WU s g.p ' •ise' 10 94 - _____-_- -- 74/ - --__--� '/j!T11TTTPT1i - - '- - I- - --- -_--_----' --- __ - ° • ' . CITY OF EAGAN SPECIAL HUNTING PERMIT REQUEST FOR THE PURPOSE OF WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT IMPORTANT INFORMATION FOR THE APPLICANT NO FIREARM DEER HUNTING WILL BE PERMITTED except during those special hunting seasons authorized by the City Council,and controlled and conducted by the Department of Natural Resources for wildlife management purposes. Applications for special hunting permits will be considered for deer (bow hunting only), ducks, geese and pheasant only on parcels of operty of five acres or more and zoned agricultural,commercial or industrial, The maximum dates of the season for each wildlife hunted shall coincide with the hunting dates established by the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (DNR). The Eagan City Council may,at its discretion,reduce the season for each requested permit within the DNR season. The Eagan City Council may deny any application for special hunting if the permit does not serve the purposes of wildlife management, even if the applicant has complied with all of the requirements. Any hunter listed in this application may hunt only when accompanied by the applicant. A copy of this permit and appropriate identification must be carried stall times for verification by the Eagan Police Department. 1. Name: ke es 1.4 v) GA'111 (,)i 2. Street Address: 3. City/State/Zip Code: ?�c T rul& e Dr►^ Vic''� ��1/ 6-51/3 �I 4. Property Owner's Name (written permission from the property owner must accompany this permit application): ge,1 6,/1 'Silo e " 6(1111 // 6c9 , 3. Property Location Description: 13,°ctc,r fel/'r+^ 4L Nr,s N 7.074( sr•cl t'a 3s-L: * P' f)ey 6. Type of Game to be Hunted: 7. Specific Hunting Dates: ae Ski0 l lac • 31 IDENTIFICATION OF ALL HUNTERS IN HUNTING PARTY :: b. P:'ame (Beginning with the Applicant): 9. Address: r 10.Vehicle (�ct Cd Y f l��h 10 1 th I Fy i gel• CeilaN it y License # � y 17- 31 Y4 / ,�l'{ i. IL? L t4 1444 L 29111 4(t yf !' i?d C&bell VA/ky 131 C.X0 1;ii ; 401104- .4..i")1) 7 — 3i1ko 18414.- APPINIM4" 11. Police Approval/Date: 12. City Council Approval Date: 13. Expiration Date: e 1 c wp51 forms tr rm Revised 0/94 Thorson-Cornwel I Co. 5200 Willson Road • Suite 201 • Minneapolis,Minnesota 55424 Telephone: (612)927-7796 August 17, 1995 City of Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55122 To Whom It May Concern: Brian Collins has my permission to bow and arrow hunt on what is known as the Bieter farm for the 1995 Bow & Arrow Season. The Bieter farm consists of 92 acres at the northest intersection of 35E and Diffley Road. Very truly yours, /ef%..f.„ Ron Cornwell Owner RC/ps Life Director National Association of Homebuilders•Member-Minnesota Multi Housing Association-Licensed Real Estate Broker-Registered Professional Engineer CITY OF EAGAN SPECIAL HUNTING PERMIT REQUEST FOR THE PURPOSE OF WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT IMPORTANT INFORMATION FOR THE APPLICANT NO FIREARM DEER HUNTING WILL BE PERMITTED except during those special bunting seasons authorized by the City Council,and controlled and conducted by the Department of Natural Resources for wildlife management purposes. Applications for special bunting permits will be considered for deer (bow hunting only), ducks, geese and pheasant only on parcels of property of five acres or more and zoned agricultural.commercial or industrial, The maximum dates of the season for each wildlife hunted shall coincide with the hunting dates established by the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (DNR). The Eagan City Council may,at its discretion,reduce the season for each requested permit within the DNR season. The Eagan City Council may deny any application for special hunting if the permit does not serve the purposes of wildlife management, even V the applicant has complied with all of the requirements. Any hunter listed in this application may hunt only when accompanied by the applicant. A cony of this permit and annropriate identification must be carried at all times for verification by the Eagan Police Department. L Name: 6-1-efk J-11,011( 4,1vtd 2. Street Address: 3. City/State/Zip Code: 4. Pr rty Owner's Name (written permission from the property owner must accompany this permit application): cx � 4/ bj /; 5. Property Location Description: AS o 14- Pl/0/ h1-co/ / co V el n,e/wc'S 5_ w- /// 1 e -- /A27 7 ,e- a 3 /300 !fie«POc/ Dr, 6. Type of Game to be Hunted: 7. Specific Hunting Dates: �e�r C b o cc) /6 _ (Dec 1 17q,5- IIDENTIFICATION OF ALL HUNTERS IN HUNTING PARTY S. Name (Beginning with the Applicant : 9. Address: 10.Vehicle 3-1—eph 1eI// 3? � License/aeioeV 11. Police Approval/Date: 12. City Council Approval Date: 13. Expiration Date: A ►fir ' �.:�.� g /9S a wp 1\for' u n:prm viyed 10/94 August 20, 1995 I Rocco Altobelli give Steve Huettl permission to hunt on my property from September 16 to December 31, 1995. These guidelines must be followed in order for him to hunt: 1 All of the normal regulations must be followed. 2. He must hunt within the legal shooting hours which are one-half hour before sunrise to one-half hour after sunset. 3 He must display some sign,which will be talked about prior to hunting, showing me that he will be in the woods hunting at that time. 4 He must know the land boundaries prior to hunting on the land. 5. He will notify me if there was a deer shot on the property 6 He will call the DNR if a deer has left the property and gone onto other property _),e4ke Ade STEVE HUETTL 4)/ _4-0 Mr R•CCCf AL'T`OBELLI city of cccigcin Report for Old Sibley Highway Utility 4nd Street Improvements I City Projegt No. 692 Eagan, Minnesota August 1995 9. _` S File No. 49570 SU jEC i TO REVISION ®onestroo Rosene Anderlik & 11 Associates Engineers Q Architects St. Paul, Minnesota August 31, 1995 City of Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55122 Re: Old Sibley Highway Utility and Street Improvements Project No. 692 , File No: 49570 Dear Mayor and Council: Attached is our report for Old Sibley Highway Utility and Street Improvements. The proposed utility and street improvements are presented and discussed within the report, along with detailed cost estimates and preliminary assessment roll. We will be pleased to meet with the Council and other interested parties at a mutually convenient time to discuss the report. Yours very truly, BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK& ASSOCIATES, INC. Mark A. Hanson MAH:gs I hereby certify that this report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Registered Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Mark A. Hanson Date: August 31, 1995 Reg. No. 14260 Reviewed by: Department of Public Works p /� Reviewed by: " RELIMINARY Finance Department $L P J P C , To j R E VI S,O N Date: OLD SIBLEY HIGHWAY UTILITY AND STREET IMPROVEMENTS EAGAN, MINNESOTA PROJECT NO. 692 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page No. LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS 2 SCOPE 3 FIGURE NO 1-LOCATION PLAN 4 FEASIBILITY AND RECOMMENDATION 3 DISCUSSION 3 A. Samtary Sewer 3 B. Water Main 5 C. Street/Storm Sewer 6 EASEMENT AND PERMITS 7 COST ESTIMATE 7 AREA TO BE INCLUDED 8 ASSESSMENTS 8 REVENUE SOURCES 10 PROJECT SCHEDULE 11 APPENDIX A- PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATES 12 APPENDIX B - PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL 15 FIGURE NO. 2 - Sanitary Sewer 19 FIGURE NO. 3 - Sanitary Sewer Assessment 19 FIGURE NO. 4 - Water Main 20 FIGURE NO. 5 - Storm Sewer 21 FIGURE NO 6 - Street/Storm Sewers 22 FIGURE NO. 7 - Street Assessments 23 PPP Pi SCOPE This project provides for the construction of sanitary sewer, water main, storm sewer, and street to serve the proposed Eagan Heights development. Eagan Heights development is located north of Diff ley Road (Co Rd. 30) and west of Cedar Avenue Freeway (T.H. 77). The improvements for the most part are included in the exlstmg right-of-way for Old State T.H. 13 and Old Sibley Highway Eagan Heights includes 30 townhome lots. FEASIBILITY AND RECOMMENDATION This project is feasible from an engineering standpoint and is in accordance with Eagan's Comprehensive Plans for utilities and street. The project can best be carried out as one contract. Sidewalk construction is not included. It is recommended consideration be given for sidewalk construction along a portion of Old Sibley Highway. Street lights are also not included. It is recommended consideration be given to street lights along Old Sibley Highway DISCUSSION Sanitary Sewer: An 8" diameter sanitary sewer exists in Old T.H. 13 to properly serve Eagan Heights. Two connections are proposed to serve Block 1 and Out Lot A, which will be constructed privately by the developer. The sanitary sewer to serve Block 2, is shown in Figure No. 2, and is proposed to be constructed along and/or near the common lot line between Parcel 017-50 and 010-52. The sanitary sewer will be extended in Old Sibley Highway to serve Block 2 of Eagan Heights and Parcel's 010-52 and 020-52. The developer is presently attempting to acquire the easement along the common lot line. It's proposed Parcel 031-52 will receive its sanitary sewer service from the existing sanitary sewer in Old T.H. 13. Water Main: A 12" diameter water main exists in Old T.H. 13 and Cedar Avenue Freeway (T.H. 77). Two connections to the existing 12" main are proposed to serve Eagan Heights All water mains to properly serve Eagan Heights are proposed to be constructed privately by the developer However, it is proposed two water main extensions be made to Old Sibley Highway as shown on Figure No 4. The 6" water main extension to Group W Addition is to provide a hydrant for fire protection. Group W Addition receives its water service from the existing 12" water main in Old T.H. 13. The 12" water main extension opposite Parcel 010-52 is not only to provide a hydrant for lire protection but also water service to the front of Parcel 010-52 and future water service to Parcel 020-52 and the front of 031-52. It's proposed to locate the 12" water main in the westerly PRELJAA v INA RV 3 TO REVISic,V YANKEE DOODLE RD (Co Rd. 28) r - 1 , • ti j, , ( .,..i i.; . r:r..i:au „� Vii-:.'Ti tl� ..... a° -1 �_. at, :(-J t '. ^ .. ' `l__. ( S/LV RI BILL ROADI' 1 ,- \\ j z I ; l`LR i r ..f.., 1, , Yom:. r: : tom. �.'( r , � I ;}off.�'..:._c' Ai�'.I i1,� �C.i ..[l .•OLD S/ � t '� , l rf:Trr ; iT! :?�I eLErH ., �.. r.., , :�,.::__,r rsT:. -; r PROJECT t - `.` \--1"1714.1.11:1.1.!.:;,';1 l? i:.?-r,t�. f � (.1,I.,� PflO✓ X11 -.� : 1-:- ' ,.. ,mot: .-i trL ( ,, ' ' ,.4. r`• l J'_./ ` t 1- tl ,.iTJ __ 1 j 1 `.1� •L'rJ YI_1"",r} ,C, .41f 1a$ .r.1. 1 ":.;�1! ' .. i1"1'f1 _.L.� r' •' S',. r'r';4 �F-Pv <J - j y I. -�ci ,,,.c( :;:i,J4.` �I, t,v.7-- ,7•, 'T l . —( , . � •! 6 770 /-7Z,* i ;"!,Tivz\--.,7-7i).-*!../4=-,/,!f,7;.-. :-7 k. i s l ; DI ` 4 L i i.. ' 1 .-._.. . .._, 0A (Co. Rd. 3 (rte+ ., ' k� a - • <; -. ,xis�� : 1',� l { = i v/�^r ,l(''� .?r:�1-���,'>:i, f? *t] �. � ..7 L _-� r i %I. .r-1_ � . �i 4 .,,:•�.Z -� t.' S'r� ‹gt.1l'��1 D 47� .\ i',;E ..1_. Q ., -} / i ,. (.4.,1,10;/..:,. ra ' i+11 i j'1 W I ; L71'' • l, . i v .:ri,ri r rrrrrrr jrrrrrr r•rr : ,........1.<1';'111<';', N ;::vi ; . i ri,' I:` , I ;` ff .I;1 i I`_ CLIFF ROAD (Co. Rd. 32) 1000 2000 R �. ; �IAR1' Scale In feel h SUBJECT. TO FEVISION ti LOCATION PLAN Boneatroo Rosene • EAGAN, MINNESOTA FIGURE 1 Anderlik b UTILITY AND STREET IMPROVEMENTS Associates CITY PROJECT No. 692 49570F01 DWG AUGUST 1995 COMM 49570 boulevard of Old Sibley Highway so it can be extended easily in the future if required. Eagan Heights is located in the intermediate pressure zone. Street/ Storm Sewer: The proposed street/storm sewer construction is shown on Figures 5 and 6 to serve Eagan Heights. The existing streets located on the west side of the plat, which will provide access to the site are rural section of roadways except 900 feet of Old Sibley Highway, which is an urban section. The urban section was constructed in 1985 to properly serve Group W Addition. The existing urban section includes a 32' wide street with B618 concrete curb and gutter (section equals 41/" thick bituminous surface and 6" thick aggregate base) It is proposed as part of this project to construct the rural section roadways abutting Eagan Heights to an urban section with B618 concrete curb and gutter. The street width will equal the existing width of the in place urban section opposite Group W Addition. It is also proposed to realign Old Sibley Highway as the through street such that Old T.H. 13 will connect to Old Sibley Highway as shown on Figure 6. Additional right-of-way is required from Eagan Heights to provide a proper boulevard width as shown in Figure 6. At the intersection of Diffley Road It is proposed to reclaim the existing bitummous surfaces into the existing aggregate base and salvage all existing aggregate base The lateral storm sewer is the proposed to be constructed as shown on Figure 5. The lateral storm sewers are required to collect street runoff and runoff from the abutting properties located on the west side of Old Sibley Highway. The storm sewers will discharge into proposed storm sewers and ponding areas in Eagan Heights. EASEMENT PERMITS Easements are required to construct a portion of the sanitary sewer and realign Old Sibley Highway abutting the cul-de-sac. The sanitary sewer easement is presently being acquired by the developer while the additional street easement will be dedicated as part of the final plat approval for Eagan Heights. It's anticipated no costs will be incurred for easement acquisition. Permits are required from MPCA and MHD for sanitary sewer and water main construction. PREL/AA/A VEA R 6tiejECT TO' VISION 4 COST ESTIMATES A detailed cost estimate is presented in Appendix A located at the back of this report and is summarized below: Sanitary Sewer $ 61,430.00 Water Main 23,350.00 Street/Storm Sewer 296,010.00 $ 380,790.00 The total estimated project cost is $380,790.00, which includes contingencies and indirect cost. Contingency costs are estimated at 5 percent while indirect costs are estimated at 30 percent, which includes legal, engineering, administrative and construction interest. AREA TO BE INCLUDED Assessment area: SW 1/4 Section 19 Parcel 017-50 Parcel 010-52 Parcel 020-52 Parcel 031-52 Parcel 011-54 Eagan Heights Parcel 011-57 Eagan Heights Parcel 018-50 Eagan Heights ASSESSMENTS Assessments are proposed to be levied against the benefitted properties in accordance with Eagan's assessment policy Assessment rates will be revised based on final project costs. It is recommended a review of trunk area assessments be made to insure trunk area assessments have been levied for this area. Sanitary Sewer: Sanitary sewer proposed herein is lateral. It is proposed to assess sanitary sewer on an area basis as shown in Figure 3. The estimated assessment rate is $ 3,530/acre. PRELIMINARY 5 SUBJECT TO REV+SIGN Water Main: Water man extensions proposed herein are m anticipation of future water main extensions and to provide tire protection. For purposes of this report it is assumed the water main extensions will be the responsibility of the City Street/ Storm Sewer: Street/ Storm Sewer proposed herein are lateral. It is proposed to assess the street/storm sewer cost on a front foot basis as shown on Figure 7. The estimated assessment rate is $85 60/ front foot, which includes grading, storm sewer and street. REVENUE SOURCES Revenue sources to cover the cost of this project are fisted below. Project Cost Revenue Balance Sanitary Sewer Lateral $ 61,430.00 Lateral Assessment $ 61,430.00 Subtotal $ 61,430.00 $ 61,430.00 $ 0.00 Water Main Lateral $ 23,350.00 Lateral Assessment $ 0.00 Subtotal $23,350.00 -$23,350 00 Street/Storm Sewer Lateral $ 296,010.00 Lateral Assessment $296,010.00 $ 0.00 Subtotal $ 296,010.00 $296,010.00 $ 0 00 TOTAL -$ 23,350.00 The estimated project defect is $23,350.00, which will be the responsibility of the City. PEEL EC 4Ry V/S/ON 6 PROJECT SCHEDULE Present Report September 5, 1995 Public Hearing October 2, 1995 Approve Plans/ Specifications October 2, 1995 Open Bids / Award Contract November 7, 1995 Substantial Completion June 15, 1996 Assessment Hearing August 1996 First Payment w/Real Estate Taxes May 1997 t,+ .;7 IN/1 °i9"-• /?k of61/0v 7 APPENDIX A PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE OLD SIBLEY HIGHWAY UTILITY & STREET IMPROVEMENTS Project No. 692 A. Sanitary Sewer 800 LF 8" PVC Sanitary Sewer 15'-20' dp @ $30/LF $24,000.00 200 LF 8" PVC Sanitary Sewer 0'-15' dp @ $24/LF 4,800 00 4 EA Std. 4' diam. MH w/csts. @ $1,500/EA 6,000 00 30 LF MH depth greater than 8' dp @ $90/LF 2,700 00 1 EA Connect to ex MH @ $2,500/EA 2,500.00 LS Clear grub trees @ $2,000/LS 2,000.00 1 0 AC Restoration@ $3,000/AC 3,000.00 Subtotal $45,000.00 + 5% Contmgency 2,250.00 $47,250.00 + 30% Indirect Cost 14,180.00 TOTAL SANITARY SEWER $61,430.00 B. Water Main 130 LF 12" Dip Water Main @ $30/LF $ 3,900.00 100 LF 6" Dip Water Main @ $20/LF 2,000.00 3 EA 12" GV Box @ $1,000/EA 3,000.00 2 EA 6" GV Box @ $600/EA 1,200.00 2 EA Hyd @ $1,500/EA 3,000.00 2000 LB Fittings @ 2.00/LB 4,000.00 Total $ 17,100.00 + 5% Contingency 560.00 ^ 17,960.00 +30% Indirect Cost P� 5,390.00 TOTAL WATER MAIN 'ilia �`/ $ 23,350.00 740 V/1 I r v 4s/ 8 �y , 4�, C. Street/Storm Sewer Lump Sum Clear grub trees @ $4000/LS $ 400000 3000 CY Common excavation @ 5.00/CY 15,000.00 4200 SY Reclaimation bituminous surface @2.50/SY 10,500.00 500 CY Subgrade correction @ 5.00/CY 2,500.00 500 CY Select granular barrow @ $6.00/CY 3,000.00 8200 SY Subgrade preparation @ 1.00/SY 8,200.00 3700 TN Class 5 aggregate base 100% crushed @ 7.50/TN 27,750.00 1500 TN Bituminous base course @ 20.00/TN 30,000.00 750 TN Bituminous wear course @ 22.00/TN 16,500.00 4300 LF B618 Concrete curb &gutter @ 7.00/LF' 30,100.00 17 EA Adjust structure @ $200/EA 3400.00, 970 LF Storm sewer pipe @ 30/LF 29,100.00 10 EA Std. MH/CB w/cstg @ $1400/EA 14,000.00 2 EA Storm sewer apron @ 1,000/EA 2,000.00 20 CY Rip Rap @ 50/CY 1,000.00 600 CY Topsoil borrow @ 8.00/CY p 4,800.00 4.0 AC Seed w/mulch/Fertilizer @ 1500/AC 6,000.00 2000 SY Sod @ 2.00/SY 4,000.00 • Lump Sum Traffic Control 5,000.00 Total $ 216,850.00 +5% Contingency 10.850.00 $ 227,700.00 +30% Indirect Cost 68310.00 Total Street/Storm Sewer $ 296,010.00 A/ iii T ro ti r /0N 9 ._ APPENDIX B PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL OLD SIBLEY HIGHWAY UTILITY & STREET IMPROVEMENTS Project No. 692 A. Sanitary Sewer Assessable Parcel Area , -, Total Description (Acre) Eak/A6ig Assessment c.','":i'>.1.,! — , ,, ., '-4,-,,,-;t-, i',---,,,,•., ' "I* , ' SW 1/4 Section 19 -, Parcel 017-50 -, 0:51 ' '' $:3,530'"•,— - ' $ 1,765 Parcel 010-52 . 1.3 3,530 4,590 Parcel 020-52 0.8 3,530 2,824 Eagan Heights Block 2 Ali - . U M 52.251 Total 174 $61,430 , . ‘..- . . .... .., , - ,-.1',.:.=.7 -'''''• .! B. Street/Storm Sewer ' .. Assessable Parcel Area Total . Description (Front Feet) Rate/Acre Assessment SW 1/4 Section 19 ,1:, • , Parcel 010-52 380 $85.60 ' i,,::'- - •,' $ 32,529 -,,,, , . • , Parcel 020-52 300 85.60 * , i';--, 25;680.'- Parcel 031-52 , , 350 85.60 ., -. 29,960 Eagan Heights Block 1 635 85.60 54,357 Block 2 970 85.60 83,033 Out lot A 278 85.60 23,797 Out lot B 545 85.60 46.654 3,458 $296,010 Pi? Sife CII/44 tiCr ro RI vA 1Rk 18101y 10 SUMMARY PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL OLD SIBLEY HIGHWAY UTILITY & STREET IMPROVEMENT Project No. 692 Parcel Description Sanitary Sewer Street/Storm Sewer Total SW 1/4 Section 19 Parcel 017-50 1765 1,765 Parcel 010-52 n° 4590, 32,529, . ;;' 37,119 Parcel 020-52 2824 25,680 28,504 Parcel 031-52 29,960 29,960 Eagan Heights Block 1 54,357 54,357 Block 2 52,251 83,033 135,284 „h Outlot A 23,797 23,797 Outlot B 46.654 46.654 Total 61,430 $ 296,010 $ 357,440 vie 49/0 4, 11 N - i . 0 150 300 / MMIZZiii Seeds In feet ss Y. 031-52 14 �, Existing " ' . i/ Sanitary Sewer 3S 0 0\'t ■/ o! � i 010-52 \A\G PROPOS=' 8" gg/ 5\��'�� SAN/TARP SEWER ` \,0 0 0 J / 017-50 ----�� kti ss \ Q 15 r---- 5 40 vt // SAP �i A 14 6 •, V/ G�ss 13 —� 7 © e e 12/ 8 -.„._ 16 1 - 11 / El 4A) 10 0 10 ss 13 I © - ii`li",/4‘. / SU49.1 ‘61.■i/VI : . ��S�0N DIFFLEY ROAD Co. Rd. 30 SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENTS ki Bonestroo Rosene EAGAN, MINNESOTA FIGURE 2 NI CI Associates OLD SIBLEY HIGHWAY CITY PROJECT No. 692 49570F03.DWG AUGUST 1995 COMM 49570 N i - . 0 150 300 ,, Seal* in fed /SS $ Existing :" Sanitary ewer 031-52 N ' (0 8Ac) c2 /s� yo pzi PRELIMINARY 00 SUBJEd T 0 REVISION Ss' \ ( 3A-c5oc i , 0 A , , . Q 01 01y 15 5 C / \1 NO 14 0---(2.5— ... (4'1 TC ''0,.#4" 'J y .. �0 rpg 6 •P-q. .' SS lock to 13 Oa04.8Ac)II k 6 .t® s / Oi 109 ' ) / ss a © LATERAL SANITARY SEWER ASSESSMENT AREA is LEGEND (O.BAc) / Parcel Assessable Area DIFFLEY ROAD Co. Rd. 30 SANITARY SEWER ASSESSMENTS n Bones troo • Roeene EAGAN, MINNESOTA FIGURE 3 Anderlik d OLD SIBLEY HIGHWAY Associates CITY PROJECT No. 692 49570F07.DWG AUGUST 1995 COMM. 49570 N ` / w- 0 150 300 / iiiiMI Seals to fw i t w �� y 031-52 1\4) w S. // P4, PROPOSED 6" `'PROPOSED 12 0,�o' 3 �G' " WATER A,lA/N pv WATER/C!A 010-52 \ sing }2 AND HYDRANT AND HE'D- 'NT • er Main / 0 S\°# 40 IS 017-50 10 tar / ‘>.-- ------ 40 tki �l 0 15 Q /// IQ 5 / Y� f4:1°‘ Q III 12" / p 6 W Existing 12 G� — Water Main / 13 \ 7 011114 .► 12 8 7 p; / ~ (/ ; 11 s . / ,L) 1 10 10____, p s�, fit/ w �£► M/ ertoo N,� l F �� �Si0N DIFFLEY ROAD Co. Rd. 30 WATER MAIN IMPROVEMENTS ki Bonestroo Rosene EAGAN, MINNESOTA FIGURE 4 wig Anderlik s OLD SIBLEY HIGHWAY Associates CITY PROJECT No. 692 49570F03.DWG AUGUST 1995 COMM 49570 N 0 150 300 Seale In Not 031-52 4) PROPOSED N LATERAL . `Z`• STORM SEWER 400 63 ,,() Tr 0\0 °ti40 010-52 OG0 —s`_ n OV -.7/0, 017-50 OVV (v \\ -4 1 W 15 ' P9�1v�0 Q' ,, PROPOSED Rdo? ® 6 cam, J LATERAL 0 STORM SEWER 13--g e7 I-----fif \i ‘..- O ~• J 10 10 1 41 0,0, s____,,� Pi ,,, c Fb ;tip o � �,q s,aN DIFFLEY ROAD Co. Rd. 30 STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENTS IA Bonestroo Rosene si EAGAN, MINNESOTA FIGURE 5 wig Anderlik & OLD SIBLEY HIGHWAY Associates CITY PROJECT No. 692 49570F04.DWG SEPTEMBER 1995 COMM. 49570 ,' ,- , , ,' = -' - , .- PROVIDE 1 ° "! 'i ';' ADDITIONAL '°°"" ,- R/W DEDICATION J' 031-52 N4) ''/ PROPOSED 32' WIDE ,' STREET w/ �' � B618 CURB .0 P� 1 5 5� �a. .� - , Ov / ,' o �� �,' 010-52 , \G �� • ; SW- r .' / I ;', Q�0 O I W / 017-50 ■ !; ,' / / , , PROVIDE ' ' -' ADDITIONAL ,' ,- 15 1 Q'____#q � ` R/W DEDICATION ,'` 0���'0�1-',-;;,-' 5 W I ' ' �`QN�A 14 V1 U" /' 6 l r: f / , REALIGN OLD STATE 0R ''�''� 1 13 ' T.H. 13 w/OLD SIBLEY % , ,,- 7 / ," / HIGHWAY '' /1 1 i' 6 stAS‘G 8 r� r, PROPOSED — ` ' / 'Go 1`�; ! 32' WIDE STREET ' OO 11 1.1 / `� w/B618 CURB \ j r . 1 • 1 n 10 10 i; i; , : ' 1 , 1 r ; © ', '/ • 6 PROPOSED //,.// ��f �`• 40' WIDE STRE T % '�l► 0,r., w/B618 CURB ,� ; ` .. I :_ 9�li�.r D/FFLEY R Co. RdL 30 STREET IMPROVEMENTS Bonestroo Rosene Is EAGAN, MINNESOTA il Anderlik & FIGURE 6 Associates OLD SIBLEY HIGHWAY CITY PROJECT No. 692 49570F02.DWG AUGUST 1995 COMM. 49570 s. ' '' N „- ,- 0 100 300 �, 1 Seale n iM '� /;i/,/ 031-52 \4) / ''S , , 4• �P / � /� / / ° �P RELMINA RY °� / IS ION r SUBJECT TO REV / / /'/ 017-50 S�O �� ;� / 44 j ' W ,�p / Q ;/ ° / ,' 15 � ' I : �`/‘0� 5 / �D %, 4r / � ,, ■V"� �,; 14 16 !r' V / rah y cj ® 6 4 13 ' ; / / ,,tj,1, ::7 n . / ! /! I I .mil / ! /� ( ,si r f NEB , I ,� /�•�% ,` J / �• iGt■tA ; ,'• Ell 11 // / / I/ / , CO 14 / I / r .. COO 10 r / ! / / / u 10 ,// / / / / / . / /' / / / z • 11 % $ ; _i 3 ' ' / / / U. / / / , / I / OUTLOT A ! OUTLOT B IL I� r I ! I,....__N / t..... D/FFLEY%7b D Co. Rd. 30 STREET ASSESSMENTS JAI Bonestroo Rosene EAGAN, MINNESOTA FIGURE 7 Anderlik 6 OLD SIBLEY HIGHWAY Associates CITY PROJECT No. 692 49570F05.DWG SEPTEMBER 1995 COMM. 49570