3974 Cedar Grove Lane
t i lowg 100 O~ Use BLUE or BLACK Ink
-
--------W---O------
I X00For Office UseCitof Eap t ~ i Permit#: ~Y I Permit Fee: I
3830 Pilot Knob Road ( I 1 I
Eagan MN 55122 Date Received:
Phone: (651) 675-5675
Fax: (651) 675-5694 r 1 Staff: f'Jf~ j
0
2013 RESIDENTIAL BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION
Date: 5 14 3 Site Address: 3q "7L/ Cav (.av~ Unit
Name: - bey\Ak✓ Coro, Phone: 157- 2Y?- 3xio
Resident/
Owner Address / City / Zip: ll030~ Ave. -M ~~~yyt®u{~t MAC/ 559WO
Applicant is: Owner V/ Contractor 6ls te'
f h~ ~re-e. P'i'es r )fe
Type of Work Description of work: /VFW ~'~r'uL'>'"id►'1
Construction Cost: ~ L® 000 Multi-Family Building: (Yes No X )
Company: tE n qr ~VP • Contact: MAIY- I(eYt/ju~'1G~
Contractor Address: _3,f' ~9Ir~NQ t~ City: ~aQ
State: M/y Zip: rJ~123 Phone: 1;12 - 998 77Q4p
License / ql_; Lead Certificate
If the project is exempt from lead certification, please explain why: (see Page 3 for additional information)
COMPLETE THIS AREA ONLY IF CONSTRUCTING A NEW BUILDING
In the last 12 months, has the City of Eagan Issued a permit for a similar plan based on am aster plant?
X Yes _No If yes, date and address of master plan: _3q 92- 0 d~ 6yooe & ~
Licensed Plumber: Clandey Meg, / !"lKh~lbtrlq Phone: 952-yy$
u r
Mechanical Contractor: it Phone:
Sewer & Water Contractor: Yka Phone: 2f& -r 312
NOTE: Plans and supporting docu ents that you submit are considered to be public information. Portions of
the information may be classified as non-public if you provide specific reasons that would permit the City to
conclude that they are trade secrets.
CALL BEFORE YOU DIG. Call Gopher State One Call at (651) 454-0002 for protection against underground utility damage. Call 48 hours
before you intend to dig to receive locates of underground utilities. www.gogherstateonecall.orrq
I hereby acknowledge that this information is complete and accurate; that the work will be in conformance with the ordinances and codes of the City of
Eagan; that I understand this is not a permit, but only an application for a permit, and work is not to start without a permit; that the work will be in
accordance with the approved plan in the case of work which requires a review and approval of plans.
Exterior work authorized by a building permit issued In accordance with the Minnesota State Building Code must be completed within 180
days of permit Issuance.
x JI64 /`em*nd x
Applicant's Printed Name Applicant's Signature
Page 1 of 3
39N C , r 6NveI"
DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE 110 O7
SUB TYPES
- Foundation _ Fireplace _ Porch (3-Season) _ Storm Damage
_ Single Family _ Garage _ Porch (4-Season) _ Exterior Alteration (Single Family)
_ Multi _ Deck _ Porch (Screen/Gazebo/Pergola) _ Exterior Alteration (Multi)
'1d 01 OIL-t Plex _ Lower Level _ Pool _ Miscellaneous
_ Accessory Building
WORK TYPES
New _ Interior Improvement _ Siding _ Demolish Building*
_ Addition _ Move Building _ Reroof _ Demolish Interior
_ Alteration _ Fire Repair _ Windows _ Demolish Foundation
_ Replace _ Repair _ Egress Window _ Water Damage
Retaining Wall *Demolition of entire building - give PCA handout to applicant
DESCRIPTION
Valuation Occupancy MCES System
Plan Review Code Edition 1~I h/ SAC Units
(25%100%-__) Zoning City Water
Census Code Stories Booster Pump
# of Units Square Feet PRV
# of Buildings / Length Fire Sprinklers
Type of Construction Width`+-
REQUIRED INSPECTIONS
Footings (New Building) Meter Size:
Footings (Deck) Final / C.O. Required
Footings (Addition) Final / No C.O. Required
Foundation HVAC _ Gas Service Test Gas Line Air Test
Drain Tile Other:
Roof: -Ice & Water -Final Pool: -Footings Air/Gas Tests Final
Framing Siding: -Stucco Lath tone Lath -Brick
Fireplace: „*a ,Rough in Air Test -4-Final Windows
Insulation Retaining Wall: Footings _ Backfill _ Final
Sheathing Radon Control
Sheetrock Erosion Control
Reviewed By: Bu ding Inspector
RESIDENTIAL FEES`
Base Fee t/e l
Surcharge III
Plan Review x^"
MCES SAC )e 01
City SAC
Utility Connection Charge
S&W Permit & Surcharge
b
Treatment Plant
u
Copies
TOTAL
Page 2 of 3
I
New Construction Energy Code Compliance Certificate
Per N 1] 0 1. 8 Building Cer ifieate. A building certificate shall be posted in a permanently visible location inside Aate Cenineate Posted
the building;, The certificate shall be completed by the builder and shall list information and values of
components listed in Table NI 101.8.
Mailing Address ortbe Duelling or Duelling Unit Cite
3974 CEDAR GROVE LANE EAGAN
Name of Residential Contractor MN License Number
THERMAL ENVELOPE RADON SYSTEM
Type: Check All That Apply X Passive (No Fait)
o ~
~ o
T Z. Active (Wilk fart and mononieter or
F" a othei-system monitoring device
a
o E
~ O N v O d ~ U
C _
Insulation Location 4 Z U p w Iu
y a E E v
E6 S z ii ti, Le us i~ r.2 Other Please Describe Here
Beiow Entire Shb X
Foundation Wall X INTERIOR
Perimeter of Slab on Graat6;: i . .
Rim Joist (Foundation) X INTERIOR
Rim Joist (l Floor+) 'J 0 INTERIOR
Wall 21
Ceiling, nit. 44,
Ceiling, vaulted X
gay Windows or can ilevered areas 38
Bonus room over garage 1381211101
6
Aescribe other insulated areas
Windows & Doors Heating or Cooling Ducts Outside Conditioned Spaces
Average U-Factor (excludes skylights and one door) U: 0.29 Not applicable, all ducts located in conditioned space
Solar Heat Gain Coefficient (SHGC): 0.26 r-8 R-value
MECHANICAL SYSTEMS Make-up Air Select a Type
Appliances Heating System Domestic Water Heater Cooling System X Not required per mech. code
Fuel Type:-. Natural Gas Electric Electric Passive -
Manufacturer Lennox AO Smith Lennox Powered
Interlocked with exhaust device.
Model ML1931J1-1045XP24B GPVH50N 13ACX-018-230. Describe:
Input in Capacity in Output in Other, describe:
Rating or Size BTUS: 44,000 Gallons: so Tons: 1,5
Heat Loss: Heat Gain: Location of duct or system:
Structure's Calculated 37,689 13,291
AFUE or SEER: 13
FISPF% 93
Calculated 16,354
11 Efficiency cooling load: Cfrn's
PLAN CMS Madison " round duct OR
Mechanical Ventilation System " metal duct
Describe any additional or combined heating or cooling systems if installed: (e.g. two furnaces or air Combustion Air Select a Type
source heat pump with gas back-up furnace): X blot required per mech. code
Select Type Passive
Heat Recover Ventilator (HRV) Capacity in cfins: Low: High: Other, describe:
Energy Recover Ventilator (ERV) Capacity in cfins: Low: High: Location of duct or system:
X Continuous exhausting fan(s) rated capacity in.cfms: 130 Mechanical Room
Location of fan(s), describe: Owners bath, Main Bath Cfin's
Capacity continuous ventilation rate in cfins: 50 Insulated Flex
Total ventilation (intermittent + continuous) rate in cfins: 185 " metal duct
Created by BAM version 052009
MULTI-FAMILY
PLAN REVIEW FOR COMPLIANCE WITH AIRCRAFT NOISE ORDINANCE
Compliance with Procedures to Ensure
Submitter: Noise Impact Area Adequate Noise Attenuation:
Lennar Airport - MSP International Exterior wall construction:
16305 36th Ave. No. Noise Zone - 4 Vinyl
Suite 600 15/32" sheathing
Plymouth, MN 55446 New Infill Residence is a "COND" Tyvek wrap
952-249-3000 use in Noise Zone 4 2x6 studs 16" O.C.
R-21 batt insulation with 1/2" gypsum board
Roof Construction:
Plan. Reviewed: v Peaked roof with manufactured trusses 24" O.C.
q -7 n Roof vents
Shingles
Information Submitted: 15# felt
Annotated architectural drawings includin : 1/2" sheathing
Blown insulation R-44
Windows: Atrium 5/8" gypsum board
Swinging Patio Doors: Atrium
Entry Doors: Therma Tru Mechanical Ventilation System:
Skylights: N/A 2-ton central air conditioning unit
Compliance with STC Requirements: Window, Door Frame, Perimeter and Other Seals:
All window and door openings are to be caulked
Average window/wall area for exterior wall: l$ with butyl-based caulk
With this window/wall area ratio and STC 40 walls, windows Fireplace Chimney Cap:
with an STC 30 can be used to meet the noise reduction N/A
requirements;
Ventilation Duct Exterior Wall Penetrations:
Summary: All exterior ducts will have bends as required
by the ordinance
Other measures including duct bends and caulking are being
taken to ensure minimum transmission of noise through the Door and Window Construction:
exterior building shell so that the construction should meet Windows: Atrium (30 STC)
the compatibility guidelines.
Sliding Patio Doors: Atrium (30 STC)
Therefore, the materials and construction as proposed should
meet the requirements of the Eagan aircraft noise ordinance. Entry Doors: Therma Tru (29 STC)
Skylights: N/A
Review Completed (date):
Other Exterior Wall Penetrations:
Review Completed b : Tom Tamte Sill sealer between plates and blocks
..Ventilation, Makeup and Combustion Air Calculations
Submittal Form For New Dwellings
These blank submittal forms and instructions are available at the City website and at City Hall. The completed form must be submit-
ted in duplicate. it the time df applicatlort,of.a mechanical permit for new construction. Additional forms may be downloaded and printed at:
Site address 7 7
3 cif vr.! Date $'r ~ 2ar3
Contractor Completed
y C.r1
Section A
Ventilation Quantity
(Determine quantity by using Table N1104.2 or Equation 11-1)
Square feet (Conditioned area Including Basement -finished or unfinished Total required ventilation rid
Number of bedrooms 3 Continuous ventilation J
Directions - Determine the total and continuous ventilation rate by either using Table N1104.2 or equation 11-1.
The table and equation are below.
Table N1104.2
Total and Continuous Ventilation Rates (in cfm)
Number of Bedrooms
1 2 3 4 5 6
Conditioned space (in Total/ Total/ Total/ Total/ Total/ Total/
sq: ft.).:: continuous continuous continuous continuous continuous - continuous
1000-1500 60/40 75/40 90/45 105/53 120/60 135/68
.1501-2000 70/40 85/43 100/50 115/58 130/65 145/73
2001=2500 80/40 95/48 110/55 125/63 140/70 155/78
2501-3000 90/45 105/53 120/60 135/68 150/75 165/83
30013500 100/50 115/58 130/65 145/73 160/80 175/88
3501-4000 110/55 125/63 140/70 155/78 170/85 185/93
4001-4500: 120/60 135/68 150/75 165/83 180/90 195/98'.
4501-5000 130/65 14S/73 160/80 175/88 190/95 205/103
5001=5500 140/70 155/78 170/85 185/93 200/100 215/108
5501-6000 150/75 165/83 180/90 195/98 210/105 225/113
Equation 11-1
(0.02 x square feet of conditioned space) + [15 x (number of bedrooms + 1)) = Total ventilation rate (cfm) _
Total ventilation - The mechanical ventilation system shall provide sufficient outdoor air to equal the total ventilation rate average,
for each one-hour period according to the above table or equation. For heat recovery ventilators (HRV) and energy recovery ventila-
tors (ERV) the average hourly ventilation capacity must be determined in consideration of any reduction of exhaust or out outdoor _
air intake, or both, for defrost or other equipment cycling.
Continuous ventilation - A minimum of 50 percent of the total ventilation rate, but not less than 40 cfm, shalt be provided, on a con-
tinuous rate average for each one-hour period. The portion of the mechanical ventilation system intended to be continuous may
have automatic cycling controls providing the average flow rate for each hour is met.
G;ISAFETYUMVent-makeup-comb air submittal (2).docx Page 1 of 6
Section B
Ventilation Method
Choose either balanced or exhaust only
Balanced, HRV (Heat Recovery Ventilator) or ERV (Energy Recov- Exhaust only
ery Ventilator) - cfm of unit in low must not exceed continuous venti- Continuous fan rating in cfm
latlon rating b more than 100%.
Low cfm: High cfm: Continuous fan rating in cfm (capacity must not exceed
continuous ventilation rating by more than 100%) JrU G'.
Directions - Choose the method of ventilation, balanced or exhaust only. Balanced ventilation systems are typically HRV or ERV's.
Enter the low and high cfm amounts. Low c -Am airflow must be equal to or greater than the required continuous ventila[ion rate and
less than 100% greater than the continuous rate. (For instance, if the low cfm is 40 cfm, the ventilation fan must not exceed 80 cfm.)
Automatic controls may allow the use of a larger fan that is operated a percentage of each hour.
Section C
Ventilation Fan Schedule
Description Location Continuous Intermittent
,57
Directions - The ventilation fan schedule should describe what the fan is for, the location, cfm, and whether it is used for continuous
or intermittent ventilation. The fan that is chose for continuous ventilation must be equal to or greater than the low c m air rating
and less than 100% greater than the continuous rate. (For instance, if the low cfm is 40 cfm, the continuous ventilation fan must not
exceed 80 cfm.) Automatic controls may allow the use of a larger fan that is operated a percentage of each hour.
Section D
Ventilation Controls
(Describe operation and control of the continuous and Intermittent ventilation)
rr
Directions - Describe the operation of the ventilation system. There should be adequate detail for plan reviewers and inspectors to verify design and
installation compliance. Related trades also need adequate detail for placement of controls and proper operation of the building ventilation. _If'_"_ _
exhaust fans are used for building ventilation, describe the operation and location of any controls, indicators and legends. If an ERV or HRV is to be
installed, describe how it will be installed, If it will be connected and interfaced with the air handling equipment, please describe such connections as
detailed in the manufactures' installation instructions. If the installation instructions require or recommend the equipment to be interlocked with the
air handling equipmentfor proper operation, such interconnection shall be made and described.
Section E
Make-up air
Passive (determined from calculations from Table 501.3.1)
Powered (determined from calculations from Table 5013.1)
Interlocked with exhaust device (determined from calculation from Table 501,11)
Other, describe:
Location of duct or system ventilation make-up air: Determined from make-up air opening table
Cfm Size and type (round, rectangular, flex or rigid)
(NR means not required)
Page 2 of 6
Directions -!n order to determine the makeup air, Table 501.3.1 must be filled out (see below). For most new installations, column A
will be appropriate, however, if atmospherically vented appliances orsolid fuel appliances are installed, use the appropriate column.
For existing dwellings, see 1MC501.3.3. Please note, if the makeup air quantity is negative, no additional makeup air will be re-
quired for ventilation, if the value is positive refer to Table 501.3.2 and size the opening. Transfer the cfm, size of opening and type
(round, rectangular, flex or rigid) to the last line of section D. The make-up air supply must be installed per !MC 501.3.2.3.
Table 501.3.1
PROCEDURE TO DETERMINE MAKEUP AIR QUANITY FOR EXHAUST EQUIPMENT IN DWELLINGS
(Additional combustion air will be required for combustion appliances, see KAIR method for calculations)
One or multiple power one or multiple fan- One atmospherically vent Multiple atmospherlcal-
vent or direct vent ap- assisted appliances and gas or oil appliance or ly vented gas or oil
pliances or no combus- power vent or direct vent one solid fuel appliance appliances or solid fuel
tion appliances appliances appliances
Column C Column D
Column A Column 8
1.
a) pressure factor 0.15 0.09 0.06 0.03
(cfm/sf)
b) conditioned floor area (sf) (including t p
unfinished basements) 177 $
Estimated House infiltration (cfm): (la tt~~V l-
x lb] Oc 7
2. Exhaust Capacity
a) continuous exhaust-only ventilation
system (cfm); (not applicable to ba-
lanced ventilation systems such as
HRV)
b) clothes dryer (cfm) 135 135 135 135
c) 80% of largest exhaust rating (cfm);
Kitchen hood typically
(not applicable if recirculating system
or if powered makeup air is electrically
interlocked and match to exhaust)
d) 80% of next largest exhaust rating
(dm); bath fan typically
(not applicable if recirculating system Not
or if powered makeup air is electrically Applicable
Interlocked and matched to exhaust)
Total Exhaust Capacity (cfm); 18-
[2a + 2b+2c+2d] 5
3. Makeup Air Quantity (c(m)
a) total exhaust capacity (from above) 7 ! Q s ' _ _
b) estimated house infiltration (from '1 CJ
above) 0 6 7
Makeup Air Quantity (cfm);
[3a-3b)
e~
(if value Is negative, no makeup air is
needed) -
4. For makeup Air Opening sizing, refer
to Table 501.4.2 "V LQ
A. Use this column if there are other than fan-assisted or atmospherically vented gas or oil appliance or if there are no combustion appliances. (Power vent
and direct vent appliances may be used.)
8. Use this column if there Is one fan-assisted appliance per venting system. (Appliances other than atmospherically vented appliances may also be in-
cluded.)
C. Use this column if there Is one atmospherically vented (other than fan-assisted) gas or oll appliance per venting system or one solid fuel appliance.
D. Use this column If there are multiple atmospherically vented gas or oil appliances using a common vent or if there are atmospherically vented gas or oil
appliances and solid fuel appliances.
Page 3 of 6
Makeup Air Opening Table for New and Existing Dwelling
Table 501.3.2
One or multiple power One or multiple fan- One atmospherically Multiple atmospherically
vent, direct vent ap- assisted appliances and vented gas or oil ap- vented gas or oil ap- Duct di-
pliances, or no combus- power vent or direct pliance or one solid fuel piiances or solid fuel ameter
tion appliances vent appliances appliance appliances
Column A Column B Column C Column D
FPassiveening 1-36 1-22 1-15 1-9 3
Passive opening 37-66 23-41 16-28 10-17 4
Passive opening 67-109 42-66 29-46 18-28 5
Passive opening 110-163 67-100 47 - 69 29 - 42 6
Passive opening 164-232 101-143 70-99 43-61 7
Passive opening 233 - 317 144-195 100-135 62 - 83 8
Passive opening 318-419 196-258 136-179 84-110 9
w/motorized damper
Passive opening 420-539 259-332 180-230 111-142 10
w/motorized damper
Passive opening 540-679 333-419 231-290 143-179 11
w/motorized damper
Powered makeup air >679 >419 >290 >179 NA
Notes:
A. An equivalent length of 100 feet of round smooth metal duct is assumed. Subtract 40 feet for the exterior hood and ten feet for each 90- degree elbow to
determine the remaining length of straight duct allowable,
B. if flexible duct is used, increase the duct diameter by one inch. Flexible duct shall be stretched with minimal sags. Compressed duct shall not be accepted.
C. Barometric dampers are prohibited In passive makeup air openings when any atmospherically vented appliance is installed.
D. Powered makeup air shall be electrically interlocked with the largest exhaust system.
Sections F
Combustion air
Not required per mechanical code (No atmospheric or power vented appliances)
Passive (see IFGC Appendix E, Worksheet E-1) Size and type
Other, describe:
Explanation -if no atmospheric or power vented appliances are installed, check the appropriate box, not required. If a power vented
or atmospherically vented appliance installed, use IFGC Appendix E, Worksheet E-1 (see below). Please enter size and type. Com*
tion air vent supplies must communicate with the appliance or appliances that require the combustion air.
Section F calculations follow on the next 2 pages.
Page 4 of 6
- WCI9FliESOft ' 7 - Project Summary Job: Colonial Patriot Madison
Date: MAY 9, 2013
Entire House By:
Elander Mechanical Inc.
591 Citation Drive, Shakopee, MN 55379 Phone: 952-445.4692 Fax 952445-7487
O Project Information
For: .3/7~, Ce,4, 6,acr2 9i~^&
Notes: YvfN G/ , ocb ; _37r 6 a 7 ll
AIC
Design Information
Weather: Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN, US
Winter Design Conditions Summer Design Conditions
Outside db -95 OF Outside db 88 OF
Inside db 70 OF Inside db 72 OF
Design TD 85 OF Design TD 16 OF
Daily range M
Relative humidity 50 %
Moisture difference 33 gr/lb
Heating Summary Sensible Cooling Equipment Load Sizing
Structure 29808 Btuh Structure 11524 Btuh
Ducts 1181 Btuh Ducts 514 Btuh
Central vent (74 cfm) 6700 Btuh Central vent (74 cfm) 1253 Btuh
Humidification 0 Btuh Blower 0 Btuh
Piping 0 Btuh
Equipment load 37689 Btuh Use manufacturer's data y
Rate/swing multiplier 1.00
Infiltration Equipment sensible load 13291 Btuh
Method Simplified Latent Cooling Equipment Load Sizing
Construction quality Tight
Fireplaces 1 (Average) Structure 1348 Btuh
Ducts 121 Btuh
Heating cooling Central vent (74 cfm) 1593 Btuh
Area (ft' 1729 1729 Equipment latent load 3062 Btuh
Volume (ft') 13832 13832
Air changes/hour 0.23 0.07 Equipment total load 16354 Btuh
Equiv. AVF (cfm) 52 16 Req. total capacity at 0.70 SHR 1.6 ton
Heating Equipment Summary Cooling Equipment Summary
Make Lennox Make Lennox
Trade MERIT 90 Trade 13ACX Series - RFC
Model ML193UH045XP24B-* Cond 13ACX-018-230 '
AHRI ref 4792130 Coil C33-25"+TDR
AHRi ref 1031313
Efficiency 93AFUE Efficiency 11.9 EER, 13.5 SEER
Heating input 44000 MBtuh Sensible cooling 12950 Btuh
Heating output 41000 Btuh Latent cooling 5550 Btuh
Temperature rise 50 OF Total cooling 18500 Btuh
Actual air flow 768 cfm Actual air flow 617 cfm
Air flaw factor 0.025 cfm/Btuh Air flow factor 0.051 cfm/Btuh
Static pressure 0 in H2O Static pressure 0 in H2O
Space thermostat Load sensible heat ratio 0.81
Bold/italic values have been manually overridden
Calculations approved by ACCA to meet all requirements of Manual J 8th Ed.
2013-May-09 10:33:33
wrilghtsoft' Right-Sulte® Universal 2012 12.1.06 RSU13410 Page 1
AC CA ...plHeat Losses 20131Lenner Patriot Madison Amp Calc = MJ8 Front Dow faces: N
wri htsoft- Component Constructions Job: Colonial Patriot Madison
9 Date: MAYS. 2013
Entire House By:
Elander Mechanical Inc.
591 Cilation Drive, Shakopee, MN 55379 Phone: 952445-4692 Fax 952-445-7487
Project Information
For:
Design Conditions
Location: Indoor: Heating Cooling
Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN, US Indoor temperature (°F) 70 72
Elevation: 837 ft Design TD (°F) 85 16
Latitude: 45°N Relative humidity 50 50
Outdoor: Heating Cooling Moisture difference (gr/Ib) 54.5 32.7
Dry bulb (°F) -95 88 Infiltration:
Daily range (°F) - 19 (M) Method Simplified
Wet bulb (°F) - 71 Construction quality Tight
Wind speed (mph) 15.0 7.5 Fireplaces 1 (Average)
Construction descriptions Or Area U-value Insul R Htg HTM Loss Cig HTM Gain
R' 9tuh/l1'-'F ft? *F0uh MUM' 9tuh atuhlft' stun
Walls
12F-Osw: Frm wall, vnl ext, r-21 cav ins, 112" gypsum board int n 544 0.065 21.0 5.52 3006 1.08 589
fnsh, 2"x6" wood frm a 425 0.065 21.0 5.52 2347 1.08 460
s 524 0.065 21.0 5.52 2896 1.08 567
w 364 0.065 21.0 5.52 2008 1.08 393
all 1857 0.065 21.0 5.52 10257 1.08 2009
Partitions
(none)
Windows
61A: VINYL Insulated Glass Double Hung; NFRC rated a 50 0.290 0 24.6 1237 28.9 1448
(SHGC=0.26) w 112 0.290 0 24.6 2748 28.9 3218
all 162 0.290 0 24.6 3985 28.9 4666
Doors
11JO: Door, mtl fbrgl type a 21 0.600 6.3 51.0 1071 16.7 351
s 20 0.600 6.3 51.0 1012 16.7 331
w 21 0.600 6.3 51.0 1071 16.7 351
all 62 0.600 6.3 51.0 3154 16.7 1033
Ceilings
16CR-44ad: Attic ceiling, asphalt shingles roof mat, r-44 cell ins, 1065 0.022 44.0 1.87 1992 0.91 969
5/8" gypsum board int fnsh
Floors
20P-38c: Fir floor, frm fir, 12" thkns, carpet flr fnsh, r-5 ext ins, r-38 12 0.030 38.0 2.55 31 0.34 4
cav ins, amb ovr
2013-38c: Fir floor, frm fir, 12" thkns, carpet fir fnsh, r-5 ext ins, r-38 309 01030 38.0 2.55 788 0.34 105
cav ins, gar ovr
20P-38v: Fir floor, frm fir, 12" thkns, vinyl flr fnsh, r-5 ext ins, r-38 80 0.030 38.0 2.55 204 0.34 27
cav ins, gar ovr
22B-5tpm: Bg floor, heavy dry or light damp soil, on grade depth, r-5 122 0.449 5.0 38.2 4656 0 0
edge ins
2013-May-09 10:33:33
" wrightsaft' Right-sultsV Universal 2012 12.1.06 RSU13410 Page 1
ACCA ..•PtHeat Losses 20131Lenner Patriot Madison A.rup Cale = MJ8 Front Door faces: N
o 'h
U
r j
N U, ff 4,9
n N
E l1J
z
:LL 1~y o jG.3 ,
B.. rye ' ((1 F ~r r r - < - - w r
F r.r L.- is
Z" p m c_ O
co
o as > A p
C) 0 O O O O w o V
CY O x a. n. a 0 o~~ m W a.
co Lf) o m M
p Q ? p N
q V of z r W co W
U
0 O (OD co t
N I N X C. (D (D ID X x O
fD M M M (p
U U) ...1 Z X r X ~X~pp X X r- X
c; 't 0) o
COW2
Cp >
U) ♦ f~♦f~!
Ln V n a z z Z Z Z Z z Z Z
C) X
f~
Q.Q Q W' Z Z Z Z Z z z Z Z
m'
c+~ O W -r
L. N a~ 1 ell U Z i 0)
~ ' Q ^ O U a o
cv OT Q ° E
LO 2 (Y) uj N [Y Ir N N W
i+
33 >
W j g ( co
0) d (A I C9 ; v N N _ V N W
CD, Cd GO p
t cxa x N z h
0. U- Z Q V z q v N N N N
Q Q. CL ;W if M U U N N N M U
C2 c
fA m ll1 co s N f c7 U p q U? W
N
O M r ? p ¢ Uh) U) M M CO Q 0 -'5
Ix f.
Q W } C7 Q c q to U z Q
G
w c9 C7 C7 Q z U
I-- 1_
ct) in
W 1 O` J Z z z J .W.! Z Z z
0 Z z ~r -Z; j p z X Z p p F 2 2 W
Z W U) Q's X C7 a C? W W C7 C3
G Q J I 4. CO fZ li ll. co fA cn
27 O= Z 112 .F O O O d O Q O O Q
QM~ Q ~Z
Z C) ( Z jZ N N N O O O O
z c) 1" ( Z 04
W cD a W I U) N U) U U H N cn ui co
CL;
(0
air
LL N Ll. LL. N N
O O CS o O O O
N V L= V O c O
O i U-, i `M 5,
rL (D
4D m Q. i -p X x x x x x x x X
E •a > Q. a H a M M a M
o
o•o L
UQU amen 55°
• macaw "•e a°oa sn iOIUVIT WINO[IOO IOM VIODIN uNanao[zAZ~ n 0
mtsw• x,nW a,ul •as• lnawuoa sn Z1dNN97 zm" 9AOIIO WVC D pla-l"s
I~n~~~~ au ~o rmanoN • s, un• •sozsa. ra~ra[• • ~ Q
pww U[ N)l.a iel °]Aaxu. zlNt M.NNT °~colM.1M
abna'HII a zm a 9- A.olI~ w '~YAI®tTa'D. a[Nxo i
z
_ °aa ~a y1
e o. it ~fy
~ L. M a•., t 111
} [I s r ~
Jim;! wilt
8 • • Ir xa .s•A ft
•,y ..K I•n tt a 1•J ~g } H 1
.ra i. l I
rain nary
y .r.•c 1
i i 1 w•• Yqp ~a 21 ~ ~ ~ ~ L r x Q
1 1` as . . a a a a a - w•w • t
a xvaa a\ ♦ a`. `a ;•I(`a fF~~~ `a ,1l1 I p
§ ¢'°wa u$ aa`` ~`~a a``~ a ~5 .^4$ `all 1 •
rqz as a a . `a I h ` a rJ I ;
,aa le.•a•.•ua•s
---f-_---"- -
r--------------t. r----i
I r~-li 11 I i
I I .rte-.• » I ~s 1 ;
I L J ,5 1✓ 1
! 1 I 1 1 I
1 .M[FA ,tT A•,, .M t•.• 1 1 .O.•,, I 1
1 1 1 ! 1
1 f I ! I
1 I 'll i I C' ! 1~ Z k
1 I 1
~ r 1 1 + mtat i~
1 1 ..n I k 1 I
1 1 I ~ t
1 I 1 1
1 L----------------- I
L______
1
I
LOT SURVEY CHECKLIST FOR RESIDENTIAL
BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION
PROPERTY LEGAL: hb t" G L
' DATE OF SURVEY: 3 1~L~
LATEST REVISION:
a~
a~
c
ca
s
U
o z a DOCUMENT STANDARDS
❑ ❑ Registered Land Surveyor signature and company
❑ ❑ Building Permit Applicant
❑ ❑ Legal description
❑ ❑ Address
❑ ❑ North arrow and scale
❑ ❑ House type (rambler, walkout, split w/o, split entry, lookout, etc.)
❑ ❑ • Directional drainage arrows with slope/gradient %
0 ❑ • Proposed/existing sewer and water services & invert elevation
"z' 0 0 • Street name
~,0 0 • Driveway (grade & width - in R/W and back of curb, 22' max.)
0 0 • Lot Square Footage
'Ja 0 ❑ • Lot Coverage
ELEVATIONS
Existing
❑ ❑ Property corners
~J ❑ ❑ Top of curb at the driveway and property line extensions
❑ 0 Elevations of any existing adjacent homes
g ❑ ❑ Adequate footing depth of structures due to adjacent utility trenches
0 ❑ Waterways (pond, stream, etc.)
Proposed
❑ ❑ • Garage floor
❑ / 0 • Basement floor
❑ ❑ • Lowest exposed elevation (walkout/window)
)z' ❑ ❑ • Property corners
❑ ❑ • Front and rear of home at the foundation
PONDING AREA (if applicable)
❑ ;Rf d ❑ • Easement line
❑ d' ❑ • NWL
❑ Y ❑ • HWL
❑ J' ❑ • Pond # designation
❑ ❑ . Emergency Overflow Elevation
❑ ❑ • Pond/Wetland buffer delineation
Y . Shoreland Zoning Overlay District
Y • Conservation Easements
DIMENSIONS
❑ ❑ • Lot lines/Bearings & dimensions
0 .0 ❑ • Right-of-way and street width (to back of curb)
p ❑ • Proposed home dimensions including any proposed decks, overhangs greater than 2', porches, etc.
(i.e. all structures requiring permanent footings)
❑ ❑ • Show all easements of record and any City utilities within those easements
❑ ❑ • Setbacks of proposed structure and sideyard setback of adjacent existing structures
❑ ❑ • Retaining wall requirements:
Reviewed By: Date
G:/FORMS/Building Permit Application Rev. 11-26-04
Surveyor 9s Certificate
SURVEY FOR :Lennar
DESCRIBED AS :Lots 1-4, Block 4, NICOLS RIDGE 5TH, City of Eagan, Dakota Cour> A4~IMUM slopes
Minnesota and reserving easements of record. Of Retaining wall Will
Be Required ,
g~
0 Sediment Basin
~O SCE=808.0
HWL=813.5
V i
i
i
i~ ~119.8
819.4
C< °o
B AIL 1 STAB.` ~ TR~
819. 6 :b o~o° mac' 820. ~iT k9V~I
p °6 °;Q°s ME I
819.4 9 ~O 1p
Q X69 ~ ~6, O
? p ~.~srn N 4
0 821.
z [F, ° O
Z 821.0 ''f °o ~O
z i-0 00 6
0715 03o0. ° .9
p0
Q 0 Cam!) 818. 20.4 ,6 y9 . pjp. U 1
W 09 0 921.
r,r \i ! O s p ud
rr 822.0 0' o
®`t 00 c°r ~3~0" ° p 821.4 Oo
(La mature `ta 81 822.0 fir, ~6ti9 0
,..aTnhome ' ° 822.3
A
H
a t, O ye oLO s ~a 4
0,P °
82 p c 8 2.
r°`rr ~ 1p~ ° rn o°~ ~ 00
r° 1.8 9m O° 1
"i> X699 °
823.0
821.4
821. ,h5
23.0
BM: NAP
823. 3 r/
(Staked) \
ED W.1A Townhome
-Vacant-
By By
Daze
LAGAN BNG ERtNG Vb.i r.
Townhome
r"®rrr>
PROPOSED ELEVATIONS rr'
Lot 1 Lot 2&3 Lot 4 BENCHMARK,
Top of Foundation = 821.5 822.5 823.5
Garage Floor = 821.1 822.1 823.1
Basement Floor = n/a n/a n/a
Aprox. Sewer Service = Verify
Proposed Elev. = C7 MIN. SETBACK REQUIREMENTS
Existing Elev. _
Drainage Directions = Front - House Side -
Denotes Offset Stake = • SCALE: 1 inch = 30 feet Rear - Garage Side -
JOB NO:
HEDLUND I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE AND CORRECT REPRESENTATION 13R-049
OF THE BOUNDARIES OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY AS SURVEYED
BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND DOES NOT PURPORT TO BOOK: PAGE:
PLANNING ENGINEERING SURVEYING SHOW IMPROVEMENTS OR ENCROACHMENTS, EXCEPT AS HOWN.
2005 Pin Oak Drive
Eagan, MN 55122 DATE 3 / 21 / 13 CAD FILE:
Phone: (651) 405-6600 J R D. LINDGREN, LAND VEYOR Nicols Ride 4th
Fax: (651) 405-6606 NESOTA LICENSE NUMBE 4376 g
June 7, 2013
Lennar Corporation
16305 36th Ave N, Suite 600
Plymouth, MN 55446
Attn: Matthew Remund
I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report
was prepared by me or under my direct supervision
and that I am a duly licensed professional engineer
under the laws of the Sta of I I•nnesota.
Nick Hanson
Date: 6-7-13
Minnesota Registration No. 46665
Subject: Foundation Wall Crack Assessment
3974 Cedar Grove Lane, Eagan, MN
Hanson Group Project: 3.154
To Whom It May Concern:
The purpose of this letter is to report the findings of a structural engineering review of existing
foundation cracks at the above address.
ASSIGNMENT
The Hanson Group has been retained to provide a structural engineering assessment of the
existing condition of the concrete cast -in-place foundation wall cracks at 3974 Cedar Grove
Lane in Eagan, MN, as directed by Matthew Remund of Lennar Corporation.
BACKGROUND
The above referenced home is a twin home structure that is currently under construction. The
City Building Department is concerned with a crack in the front left foundation wall at the
garage and the left rear wall that was noticed during inspections. The Builder wishes to have an
independent structural engineer assess the condition of the foundation wall at the areas noted
and outline general recommendations and repairs if required.
DESCRIPTION
The house is a twin home with a slab on grade main level floor and an attached garage at the
front of the home. The frost foundation walls are constructed of cast -in-place concrete and the
above grade construction is wood framed.
Lennar Corporation
Hanson Group Project: 3.154
June 7, 2013
Page 2
OBSERVATION AND COMMENTS
1. The following information was obtained through a site visit on June 7th, 2013 by Nick
Hanson, PE of The Hanson Group:
a. The site visit included visual observations of the exposed cast -in-place concrete
wall at the interior and exterior exposed portion of the front and rear frost
foundation walls of the twin home residence noted.
b. The wall was measured with a hand -tape to be approximately 42" from top of
foundation wall to top of the in-place concrete strip footing. The foundation wall
was exposed from the interior and exterior at the areas in question. The
remaining adjacent frost foundation walls were covered with backfill materials.
c. The perimeter strip footing was exposed at the front and rear with
approximately 6"-7" projecting from each face. The foundation was measured
to be a minimum of 20" wide by 8" deep.
d. Grade is reportedly a sandy -clay material (Group II) and suitable for bearing and
backfill. It is reported the foundation walls were constructed and inspected
using engineering documents and that all requirements, materials, and
inspections were followed. The backfill used within the frost wall areas to
support the concrete floor appeared to be a sandy material.
e. The crack at the front garage location was toward the left side double garage
door curb. The curb was 6" wide at the top with a 2" ledge to support the
interior concrete floor. The crack extended downward and through the footing.
At the widest portion, the crack was measured to be approximately 1/8". The
crack became smaller in other areas and could not be measured with a hand
tape. The crack appeared very vertical in nature.
f. The foundation wall at this front garage location was measured with a laser level
and found to be relatively plumb (1/8"+/-) across the height as determined
within four feet of each side of the crack at the front foundation wall. The wall
was found to be plumb with no signs of bowing or settling.
g. The concrete strip footing at this front garage location was measured with a
laser level and found to be relatively level (1/8"+/-) across the length as
determined within four feet of each side of the crack at the front foundation
wall. The footing was found to be level with no signs of heaving or settling.
h. The crack at the rear garage location was toward the left side of the structure.
The curb was 6" wide at the top with a 2" ledge to support the concrete floor.
The crack extended downward and through the footing at a drain tile location.
At the top, the crack was measured to be approximately 1/8". The crack became
hairline at the base and in other areas and could not be measured with a hand
tape. The crack appeared very vertical in nature with approximately a 6"
horizontal distance from top to bottom.
The foundation wall at this rear frost wall location was measured with a laser
level and found to be relatively plumb (1/8"+/-) across the height as determined
Lennar Corporation
Hanson Group Project: 3.154
June 7, 2013
Page 3
within four feet of each side of the crack at the front foundation wall. The wall
was found to be plumb with no signs of bowing or settling.
The concrete strip footing at this rear frost wall location was measured with a
laser level and found to be relatively level (1/8"+/-) across the length as
determined within four feet of each side of the crack at the front foundation
wall. The footing was found to be level with no signs of heaving or settling.
2. The following information is noted in regard to the above observed conditions:
a. The crack observed in the foundation wall noted above likely formed earlier in
the life of the structure and is likely the result of temperature and/or shrinkage
cracking from adjacent dissimilar materials and geometry.
b. The engineered foundation walls have a continuous horizontal reinforcing bar in
the top 12"-18" of the wall and are designed to provide frost protection and
transfer vertical loads to the footing below. A vertically natured crack does not
inhibit the ability for this wall to provide the support as originally intended.
c. This wall has equal backfill pressure on each side and should not see any lateral
loads upon completion of construction and in its final condition.
d. No structural corrective measures are required for these foundation walls to
perform their intended function. The walls do not appear to have extensively
moved as was confirmed by the plumb level measurements. The crack appears
minor in nature and the current state of this structural element appears in good
condition as the intended load paths have not been altered to resist vertical
loads.
e. All waterproofing measures are not discussed in this document as they are non-
structural and outside our expertise. All waterproofing issues and measures are
to be the responsibility of the contractor.
PROFESSIONAL OPINION
2. It is our professional engineering opinion that the existing foundation wall at the front
frost garage wall and rear house frost wall of the residence noted appears in
acceptable condition and structurally capable of performing its intended function
sufficiently without further corrective measures.
GENERAL
3. The observations and opinions expressed in this report are based on our professional
engineering judgment and professional practice, as well as limited visual observations of
exposed materials only.
4. No other engineering was performed or requested for this project. This document
pertains to the general structural assessment and condition of the exposed existing
foundation wall cracks at the front and rear frost walls of the residence located above
only. Structural design and verification of Code compliance is not part of this report. All
Lennar Corporation
Hanson Group Project: 3.154
June 7, 2013
Page 4
waterproofing, as well as means and methods of application, are the responsibility of
the owner and/or contractor. This report is limited to the foundation elements exposed
only and no destructive testing was conducted or requested.
5. All construction is assumed to be in accordance with this document, standard industry
practice, and the requirements of the Code unless further information is supplied by the
contractor or City inspector regarding the construction of the foundation system.
6. The conclusions are based on preliminary and limited examination and analysis. We
reserve the right to supplement and/or amend these findings and/or opinions should
new information become available. Concealed discrepancies and/or defects limit the
accuracy and scope of this report.
If you have any questions, please contact us.
Sincerely,
The Hang, on Group
Nick Hanson, PE
City of Eap
Address: 3974 Cedar Grove Lane Zip: 55122 Permit 110607
The following items were/ were not completed at the Final Inspection on:
r- -
Complete Incomplete Comments
Final grade - 6" from siding
Permanent steps -Garage V/
Permanent steps - Main Entry V
Permanent Driveway
Permanent Gas V
Retaining Wall or 3:1 Max Slope V/
Sod / Seeded Lawn VI
Trail I Curb Damage,
Porch
Lower Level Finish j
Deck
Fireplace -
• Verify with your builder that roof test caps from the plumbing system have been removed.
• Turn off water supply to the outside lawn faucets before freeze potential exists.
• Call the Engineering Department at (651) 675-5646 prior to working in the right-of-way or installing an
irrigation system.
Building Inspector: Af
GABuilding InspectionsTORMWIlecklists
PERMIT
City of Eagan Permit Type:Plumbing
Permit Number:EA116521
Date Issued:10/08/2013
Permit Category:ePermit
Site Address: 3974 Cedar Grove Lane
Lot:3 Block: 4 Addition: Nicols Ridge 5th
PID:10-50904-04-030
Use:
Description:
Sub Type:Residential
Work Type:Replace
Description:Water Softener
Meter Size Meter Type Manufacturer Serial Number Remote Number Line Size
Comments:Please call Building Inspections at (651) 675-5675 to schedule a final inspection.
Charles Sundean
8201 Old Central Ave
Spring Lake Park, MN 55432
Fee Summary:PL - Permit Fee (WS &/or WH)$55.00 0801.4087
Surcharge-Fixed $5.00 9001.2195
$60.00 Total:
I hereby acknowledge that I have read this application and state that the information is correct and agree to comply with all applicable State
of Minnesota Statutes and City of Eagan Ordinances.
Contractor:Owner:- Applicant -
Us Home Corp
16305 36th Ave N
Minneapolis MN 55446
Water Doctors Water Treatment Company
8201 Old Central Ave, Suite F & G
Spring Lake Park MN 55432
(763) 535-1800
Applicant/Permitee: Signature Issued By: Signature