Loading...
04/18/1995 - City Council Regular 911)4"--#‘:. AGENDA EAGAN CITY COUNCIL - REGULAR MEETING EAGAN MUNICIPAL CENTER BUILDING APRIL 18, 1995 • 6:30 P.M. I. ROLL CALL & PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE II. ADOPT AGENDA & APPROVAL OF MINUTES (BLUE) III. LEGISLATIVE UPDATE IV. VISITORS TO BE HEARD (10 MINUTE TOTAL TIME LIMIT) V. DEPARTMENT HEAD BUSINESS (BLUE) VI. CONSENT AGENDA (PINK) f,/ A. PERSONNEL ITEMS 3 B. PLUMBERS LICENSES Ala/C. APPROVE Park Systems Plan !, j D. RECOMMENDATION, Airport Relations Commission, Comments on FAA Part 150 P` Program - E. CHANGE ORDERS, Police Department Building Project � ./(o F. VACATE MnDOT Highway Easement, Receive Petition/Order Public Hearing; Deerwood Townhomes, Deerwood Drive and I-35E 12. If G. PROJECT 686, Receive Petition, Authorize Preparation of Feasibility Report, Woodgate Lane Street and Utility Improvements n y y8. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT, Shaba Johnson, to allow a beauty parlor in an R-1 fr district, located east of Highway 134 on Rustic Hills Drive �7, I. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT, Johnson's Richfield & Blacktop, to allow an auto (/ accessory sales and service facility in a General Business district located on Sibley Memorial Highway O' L{Q J. FINAL SUBDIVISION AND Final Planned Development, Oak Cliff 8th Addition, �f '/ Penn Cycle, south side of Cliff Road 42 K. FINAL SUBDIVISION, Eagan Oaks Addition ip Y L. RESOLUTION, Eagan Arbor Day and Arbor Month ,'•{(O M. RECISION of ISTEA Grant ,4 7 N. AUTHORIZE New Application for Rezoning, Easter Lutheran Church m,)D 0. APPROVE Exemption from Lawful Gambling License, Valley Viewers 4-H Club f ,P. RESOLUTION Establishing Municipal State Aid Streets 07 R. APPROVE Solicitation License, Blue Bell Ice Cream ''G S. EXTENSION of Time for Recording Final Plat, Easter Addition r T. DECLARE SURPLUS Property, Authorize Donation of Building Fixtures to Reus PCenter . VII. 7:00 - PUBLIC HEARINGS (SALMON) -' —C/ A. PROJECT 681, North Nicola Road Street Reconstruction ,C10 B. PROJECT 664, Wescott Square Street Reconstruction If:: r426 C. PROJECT 661R, Sibley Terminal Industrial Park Final Assessment Roll /J D. PROJECT 645, Blackhawk Hills Addition Street Reconstruction (S E. VARIANCE to setback, Paul J. Klein, west of Pilot Knob Road on Ost r Driv �,14eaF. VARIANCE to side yard setback, Wensman Pr perties, west of Galaxie Avenue and southeast of I-35E ((/1 G. VARIANCE, t sid yards tback, City f Eagan, for De rwood Reservoir, south it of D rwood Driv and east f I-35E • VIII. OLD BUSINESS (ORCHID) IX. NEW BUSINESS (TAN) • r A. REZONING, Hilla Inc. , from A to R-1, PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION, Whispering Woods Eleventh Addition, and VARIANCES to setback, west side of Slat r Road rdq9-.B. COMPREHENSIVE GUIDE Plan Amendment, LB to D-1, Single Family, and REZONING from LB to R-1, Nori Hart, 3850 Beau D'Rue Drive Z. LEGISLATIVE/INTERGOVERNMENTAL AFFAIRS UPDATE (GREY) XI. ADMINISTRATIVE AGENDA (GREEN) XII. VISITORS TO BE HEARD (for those persons not on agenda) • VIII. ADJOURNMENT The City of Eagan is committed to the policy that all parsons have equal access to its programs, services, activities, facilities and employment without regard to race, color, creed, religion, national origin, sex, disability, age, marital status, sexual orientation, or status with regard to public assistance. Auxiliary aids for persons with disabilities will be provided upon advance notice of at least 96 hours. If a notice of less than 96 hours is received, the City of Eagan will attempt to provide such aid. • • • • • MEMO TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCILMEMBERS FROM: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES DATE: APRIL 13, 1995 SUBJECT: AGENDA INFORMATION FOR THE APRIL 18, 1995 CITY COUNCIL MEETING a:;tYta:.fA• .aw:i.•:'t;;:'ttbn ;;•• iN.tiuu,±aa.;...PA:L:� M •'•'•'• 4 After approval is given to the April 18, 1995 City Council agenda, minutes for the April 4, 1995 regular City Council meeting and the minutes for the April 4, 1995 special City Council meeting, the following items are in order for consideration. .:. s..;:�;r:.:•:'•;r•::::,:i:'c::+;i�icai:i::a::•:•>fc•>•kcr......,xAP Paco There are no items to be discussed under Department Head Business at this time. _- 5 _- - - _-_..-_ .. ;� MINUTES : : tiii it # OF ME it-- --- - - .. . ---- ---- .. .._ .- .- . • 3A't�t:C•t??COUNCIL - • - c#vegan, Minnesotri :;i • . ,__-.-__-.._`_.___ .^ :_ .-.____ _ : __ -.. -- - .x.:April;ti, 1995.:::::: •- • -• _ -- -- - _ _. ,.r - - A special meeting of the Eagan qty Co ilAi 'on Tuesday,April 4,1996 at 4:30 p.m.at the - Eagan Municipal Center. Present were Mayor Egan and Counclimembers Wachter, Awada, Masln and - Hunter. Also present were City AdministratorTom Hedges,Director of Public Works Tom Colbert,Assistant I._ City Engineer Mike Foertsch,and Superintendent of Streets and Equipment Arnie Erhart. Public Works Director Colbert gavA'3ha#ifs c ,,pE, :moment management program. He noted �._ ..- __: that Braun intertec has modified a prograrrf'di vetope#•.by:11'4:try Corp.of Engineers for cities to project future maintenance of pavement and what type of rtitialr is bey'f;i bonomIcally for the type of distress. He • noted that the first thing that needs to be done is ta;physicaliy(r spect the pavement, identify the type of • • distress and rate Its severity. He introduced Darwlr;AAhlgren• Kelly McGovern,of Braun Intertec,who - demonstrated their program and Its various tw t Councilmember Awada suggested that the costs estimated in this program be monitored over the next couple of years to see how accurate they are compared to the feasibility reports, Indicating that perhaps this program could be used to do feasibility reports. _ Public Works Director Colbert reviewed the pavement management report,and how this program can be used to project distress and devrs: k strategies. He indicated he would like the Council to determine to what pavement condition Index:its::Gould,be maintained at and how much the Council - , wants to spend each year on pavement managerneritt 1Wi ri l then use that information to spend those • - dollars most efficiently. , '` Considerable discussion followed;9,Or.0166:iii ivthe figures for the uniform life cycle cost was - arrived at and Its accuracy.• The meeting adjourned 81 5:53 p.m. • E' OLP Date _. _ ;o»_ City Clerk - = • • - -- - L'•• • N .•:: _ t - -' - - - _ f•.•:::: a . . 4. t. i • -. • MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE • EAGAN.CITY.COUNCIL ,gagen, Minnesota . • • . : April 4, 1995 • A regular meeting of the Eagan City:poun 5.was.tietd.on Tuesday,April 4,1995 at 6:30 p.m.at the Eagan Municipal Center. Present were i$y!df F t;at Go$%cilmembers Wachter, Awada, Masin and Hunter.' Also present were City AdminlsE ato'r Tom''Heddes;•'Communhy Development Director Peggy • Reichert,Director of Public Works Torn gtbert,and City Attorney dim Sheldon. IMME Wachter moved,Awada seconded a motion to adopt the agenda. Aye: 5 Nay: 0 • Counciimember Hunter request chanotkin page 6,paragraph Z by adding the language'The _ applicant stated the urgent need for the, yr to tak .pction on this item by the end of the month',and that the words"approving this'be changed t6'pushtn8't Is through in just a few days'. He also requested a • • • change on page 7, paragraph 3,to statt,:t t;;he:epgksMt.t : y of Bumsviile'councilmembers'. Hunter moved,Awada seconded a motion to appiave.:t iiiia :l mended. Aye: 5 Nay:. 0 • Wachter moved, Masin seconded a motion to approve the minutes as presented. Aye: 5 Nay. 0 • Administrator Hedges noted that;t 1b aictfivlty n the legislature this week, the legislators were • unable to attend the meeting tonight i lics''�nvtted thkftr to attend the next Council meeting. • Councilmember Hunter'indicated he sokawlt#ttiepre entative Pawlenty about legislation that would give the comprehensive guide plan precedence ovetiohifige#03ich has the effect of giving the authority Of • toning to the Met Council. This is part of the push for regioriaiiiition that Is occurring. He relayed the qty's • concern about this to Representative Pawierty• Mayor Egan noted that at the last AM,M. meeting, it was decided to form a task force to study the whole issue of urban revitalization. The task force met on March 30 and he was one of the participants. The result was support for a mbdure of the M.ondale and Pawtenty legislation. There was a solid consensus • that there will be no more robbing the r[ot#g: the,lam}:;;they signed a letter that will be sent to the legislative delegation and they hope It w1 e persi : - • . • Councilmember Masin reported.An some i l nines meetings she attended regarding the opt-out _ legislation. She also reported on a meets she had 3ih four Metropolitan Council representatives regarding this issue, indicating they seem to be s . MINARIMPIONISIliffMREAUMONIN - . Ann Carlon, of the Convention and Visitors Bureau, handed out their new promotional piece and -- --gave a report on the activity of the Convention and Visitors Bureau. •• • Councilmember Wachter press some dod :to the Parks and Recreation Director about mulching mowers,indicating he feels ac a money could bez.saved by using these. , Parks and Recreation Director *; dgt*c#; ;Qson,the city's new Park Superintendent. • • EAGAN CITY COUNCIL MINUTES;APRIL 4,1095 • PAGE 2 In regard to Item G, Protect ti . f Work Hours. Yankee Doodle Road Reconstruction,Counofinember Wachter'E ressdtt•a•'obrtceif►•that this is being done ahead of the bid. In regard'to item K, PreliminattlbdMsion and Rezoning. Ridaecli f Woods. Cour dlmember Wachter noted that additional trees will riot be lost due to reconfiguration. in regard to Item M,Acorove Work Program. On-Site Septic System Regulations.Courdimember Wachter stated he feels this should have bon done years ago. in regard to item P,Adootina thO'*t�4 Unif�t�n Building Code. Counclimember Wachter Indicated the building code has been vague,and f1 s glad f isle changes are being made. In regard to Item 0,Tgmoorarir Seasonal Us;as. Councfineinber Hunter questioned the action to . . • be considered Community Developmenti ira lg;Reich .:hosted there was a typographical error,and the correct action is in the staff memo. ................. ......... • In regard to Item R,Billboard Ordinance.Counclmember Wachter stated he feels this is two signs, and he concurs with staff Interpretation. in regard to item I,Final Subdivision. Pines Edae 2nd Addition.Jim Stanton,of Shamrock Develop- ment,expressed a concern that he doesn't feel they can of the conditions dealing with the removal of a private easement. He would like to see it rems� ck 46th't force them to give it up. He requested that they remove these conditions. After inif.As iissibrti; staff agreed to waive these two conditions. • In regard to Item F, Traffic Siafia, ement. t�N. 149 and Yankee Doodle Road, Public Works Director Colbert noted a correction that the e�"sh,; i a3 : st is $127,000, and the estimated city cost is $32,56250• • . •A. Personnel items • Item 1. It was recommended to approve the hiring of Paul Olson as the Superintendent of Parks. item 2. It was recommended to approve the.hiring of Christopher Thomas as an MIS Intern. Item 3. It was recommended to appr Tie-3 i3nfil itif::Ra Bell Maier as the Part-time Property Room Technician. ' . • Item 4. 11 was recommended to aPProiftliktie hlrineX Cheryl Stevenson as a temporary derical worker in the Parks and Recreation Department. • item 5. It was recommended to appro�ve'tfiehrrg ay Schneider and Mark Shippee as seasonal forestry technicians. Item 6. k was recommended to approve the hiring of David Jungers as a seasonal extended operations crew leader: • Item 7. It was recommended to app*Me ehbiri tt L n Anderson as a Skilled Seasonal Street Maintenance Worker. ... • Item 8. It was recommended to acciR the letter of resition from Julie Kaufman-Boom, part-time Receptionist at the Municipal Center. • • • • EAGAN CITY COUNOL MINUTES;,APRIL 4,UN • • PAGE • • CONDITIONAL USE i::M t'A4iEMENT SERVICES • TO ALLOW ON-SALE U, • O -::tiditit i`?'F:#yt CK 1,COMSERVE NO.1 • After introductions by Mayor Egjitt and Administrator Hedges, Community Development Director Reichert gave a staff report on this,,notin4"they would only be serving liquor at private catered ,special events. Councilmember Hunter raised a concern about using up a liquor license Just for special events. Discussion followed concerning the number of liquor licenses available, the various categories of liquor licenses, and the cost for the license. Hunter moved, Masin seconded a motion to approve a conditional ' use permit to allow on-sale liquor service the River Park Office facility,subject to the following conditions: • 1. Conditional Use permitt shall subject to the Issuance of a valid liquor license. • - 2. No liquor shall be sold, servia or othe ke provided In The River Park Office Building except • for private catered,schedule:AR .,:.;.; Aye: 5 Nay: 0 ON-SALE LIQUOR LICENSE,RIVER PARK-MARRIOTT CORPORATION Hunter moved,.Masan seconded a motion to approve the on-sale liquor license for the Marriott • Corporation at River Park,leaving the remaining three liquor.licnses Undesignated. Aye: 5 Nay: 0 • MORATORIUM ON THE STRAI WADU.T=USE ESTABUSHMENTS • • After introductions by Mayor Ediaiii5a.AdmInistititor Hedges, Community Development Director Reichert gave a brief staff report on this:::::iffiiii;o4noviid, Awada seconded a motion to approve the amendment to Chapter 11 of the City Code plecinj : , torlurn on the siting of adult use establishments wwtthin any zoning district,and directing a study to be'ct:AWL Aye: 5 Nay: 0 • CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT,MARK REMICK TRUCK TERMINAL After introductions by Mayor Egan and Administrator Hedges, Community Development Director Reichert gave a staff report on this, noting a question has come up concerning the exterior building finish. • They would have to change their site plan to:cmply with tt1Q;.pew ordinance. Joe Christianson, representing.:WiligiiiWi'iaiiiiiii that according to his Interpretation, the building Is in compliance with the ordir% bbie. He tied this project will eliminate a non-conforming use. _. He added that the applicant would like to:.cequest th4the rear portion of the building not be required to be blacktopped. After some discussion,COitOunity Digiopment Director Reichert noted that this building as . proposed does not meet the code. Sh$; i d:tk # t#iertosir.esses in that area are being told that they must bring their properties up to code. P• - '. t r stated he feels the Intent of the ordinance is to exclude sheet metal. Councilmember,Awada concurred. • Mayor Egan asked whether the applicant would be willing to phase in the paving over a period'of . lime. Mr. Christianson indicted the applicant maybe able to do koin 24 years. Councdmember Hunter stated thatitttiitffilti a IcaM was In compliance before is not relevant • to this at all. This is a new application. :City has beiitM:rules on redevelopment projects, but never on new applications. He feels It wouictiieiprecedent settirtp ;.He feels It meetsithe Intent of the code to • require 75%of the exterior not be metat.p atertal,and he doesn't feel the`city should bend the rules on the parking lot paving. They are already vii Bing the code wilt *Ir proof of parking requirement He does not favor phasing In the paving. :'• • • • • t AGAN CRY coUNCSL MINUTES;APRIL 4,1995 • PAGES • Counciimember Wachter noted*Ole Remicks have been Eagan for a long time,and he would be willing to bend the rules a little on the:parking,sot. He would not go along with an,exception to the building material. Counclimember Awada concurred;*hat the Council�should not allow the metal building material. • Counciimember Hunter Indicated that if f Councit does bend the rules,he wants to make sure the rear • parking Is paved within two years. . ..• Hunter moved,Wachter seconded a motion to approve a conditional use permit for a truck terminal on Lot 7,Block 2,Sibley Terminal industrial park, subject to the conditions recommended by the Advisory -Planning Commission,with the understanding that the parking area in the rear of the building must be paved • within two years of the date of approval;; City Attorney Sheldon noted thaj,;ttis appetiiiito be a disagreement between the applicant and the • - - Council as to the interpretation of the ordinance reading exterior building materials. He feels that either an agreement needs to be reached as to,.thg:interpretation,,or the language needs to be clarified so there ' • - is no basis for any reasonable disagreement the:kif r qin. Discussion followed. • • Public Works Director Colbert expressed a concern that If the rear area Is not paved, k presents water quality and erosion Issues in the storm drainage system it may require some pretreatment ponding. More discussion followed concerning the siting and appearance of the building, and whether the • proposed materials would be allowed under the ordinance. Ccrncllmember Awada stressed that everyone needs to be treated the same and feels It is unfair,tp;rfce�lse cceptions. Mr. Christianson indicated the applicant would be willing to comply with staft's;ktti r t tlo of the ordinance on the side of the building facing the street. Counciimembers indicat>:ti:tFiRfwould'rjit be acceptable. Mr.Christianson also noted that their purchase agreement expires on Apilli&;After mor.4gliscussion,Councilmember Hunter withdrew his motion Mayor Egan noted that it appears:dial: e:pfty fates an ambiguity with regard to-exterior building materials. It could create risk for the community' ct*t,themselves up to a challenge on this ordinance. Under these circumstances, he feels this should be corttktu l:urtil the ordinance can be further reviewed. • Community Development Director Reichert noted that wheri•his'ordinance was drafted, they looked at ordinances from neighboring communities, and this building could not be built in those cities. She added that when she meets with developers and tells them what the Council's rules and regulations are, these variances make it very difficult to administer. if this is allowed, she would like some good rationale as to why k was approved,so she knows what to tell future developers as to why this variance was granted. After more discussion,Hunter moved,Wachter seeded a motion(p continue this for two weeks. Aye: 5 Nay: • 0 Some discussion followed concerning.:Water`.qualit :I Administrator Hedges indicated t the lutrig�sum Increase in pension for the volunteer firefighters was turned down by the Pension Con mci, :::;t 9': a¢:he;testified on the Borchert Ingersoll legislation before the House Environmental and Iltaiiturat: #asc4iiip q mhtee and ft passed. ft will be appearing before the Senate committee this week. . -• Counclimember Hunter indicated he feels school board elections and city elections should be held - - In the same year. ft would save a lot of money. Discussion followed. • Counciimember Wachter Indicaitiacf'he does not far Ony additional billboards In the city. City Attorney Sheldon noted thaaif'l uis Leach dismtsQ his assessment appeal on the Diffley Road • Poled. • • • • • EAGAN CITY COUNCIL MINUTES;APRIL 4,1805 PAGE 7 Administrator Hedges reviewed:* proposed settlement agreement on the Jeska workers compensation case. He noted it Is nearing settlement and needs Council action. Awada moved, Hunter seconded a motion to accept the propostl.sR 1 m s t iited. Aye: 4 Nay. 0 (Wachter abstained.) Administrator Hedges presented.a;better drafted to the City of Inver Grove Heights regarding the joint powers agreement between the cities of an and Inver Grove Heights. He indicated he recently learned that there are-no plans by the City of Inver':Grove Heights for the extension of Yankee Doodle Road,which Is very vital to our community. He asked whether the Council feels It should be made a part of the joint powers agreement deliberation and discussion. Public Works Director Colbert also raised the Issue of providing utilities to any new development in that area, indicating the city needs to ensure that that • ' development doesn't overburden the exisfing streets,parks, ponds, etc.,and noted the City of Inver,Grove • Heights Is reluctant to go into a partnerO p of dual;approval. After considerable discussion,the Council concurred that the City Administrator write::a letter:#t :lnver Grove Heights stating their position. - Administrator Hedges reviewed;aei new fort for Council packets,and several suggestions were made. Mayor Egan referred to a letter ff bit 't1'retftf-S'ttiett'lttarding the wading pool to be Installed by the Chic Arena,and asked the City Administrator to respond to the letter. • Councilmember Hunter suggested that the open issues list be dMded Into three categories, such as high priority, low priority, and routine Items. Councilmember Awada noted the Council stA met with the Capon's today,and a memo will be forthcoming on the meeting. • • Wachter moved, Egan seconded a nroti�in:,�i, pa,the check register dated March 31, 1995 in :the amount of$1,947,366.78. Aye: 5 Nay: 0 • • Wachter moved, Egan seconded a motion to adjourn at 8:54 p.m. Aye: 5 Nay: 0 • Date ::?. ?.�. :•:... .......�. City Clerk • - if you need these minutes In an alternative form such as large print;braille,audio tape,etc.,please contact - the Myer of Eagan,3830 Pilot Knob Road,Eagan,MN 55122,(612)681-4600, (TDD phone: (612)454-8535). The City of Eagan Is committed to the poll ii lt: Gas have equal access to Its programs,services, . activities, facilities and employment wiggeregard to Yom':.color, creed, religion, national origin, sex . disability,age,marital status or status 44frifregEud to publl ;a;is,sistance. • • Agenda Information Memo April 18, 1995 Eagan City Council Meeting 1 115 There are nineteen(19) items on the agenda referred to as consent items requiring one (1) motion by the City Council. If the City Council wishes to discuss any of the items in further detail, those items should be removed from the Consent Agenda and placed under Old or New Business unless the discussion required is brier A. PERSONNEL ITEMS Item 1. Seasonal Ballfield Attendants: ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: To approve the hiring of Matthew Buck, Jason Schwamb, Doug Kuehn, Nat Christiansen and Jason Witt as seasonal ballfield attendants. Item 2. Seasonal Park Attendant— ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: To approve the hiring of Laura Hampton as a seasonal park attendant. Item 3. Seasonal Park Maintenance— ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: To approve the hiring of John O'Toole, Matthew Torfin, Dale Bishop, Brian Banasewski, George Sellner, Tim Spencer, Joe Wilcox, Glen Jensen, Mark Barsness, Edward Goettel, Raymond Sperl, Mike Marxer, Milo Raaum,Dave Downs,and Leroy Berg as seasonal park maintenance employees. Item 4. Seasonal Utility Maintenance Workers-- ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: To approve the hiring of Joseph A. Wiita, Darren Lee Wilke and Christopher Beckman as seasonal utility maintenance workers. Item 5. Seasonal Tree Inspector-- ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: To approve the hiring of Eric Olson as a seasonal tree inspector. - Agenda Information Memo April 18, 1995 Eagan City Council Meeting Item 6. Seasonal Horticultural Specialist— ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: r To approve the hiring of Diana Bolander as a seasonal horticultural specialist. Item 7. Seasonal Concession Workers: ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: To approve the hiring of Deborah Buntjer, Susan Gamy, Holly Confer, Nora Flueger, Wendy Willman,Lei Lani Fischer,Julie Beecher, and Martha Buyck as seasonal concession workers. Item 8. Seasonal Recreation Leader— ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the hiring of Rachel Collingham as a seasonal recreation leader. Item 9. Summer Water Resources Internships-- ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: • To approve the hiring of Chris Wilmer, Heather Rougier and Dave Johnson as summer water resources interns. Item 10. Seasonal Engineering Intern-- ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: To approve the hiring of Jason Jahnke as seasonal engineering intern. • Agenda Information Memo April 18, 1995 Eagan City Council Meeting B. PLUMBERS LICENSES ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: To approve plumber's license for Kramer Mechanical. BACKGROUND: This application is in order for consideration by the Council at this time. • 3 • ADOPTION OF PARK SYSTEM PLAN ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: • Adoption of the Parks System Plan as the City's Comprehensive Plan for parks, - subject to review and approval by the Metropolitan Council. Direct submission of the Plan to the Metropolitan.Council. FACTS: The City has worked on updating the Parks System Plan since the fall of 1993. The Advisory Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission held a public hearing on the draft plan in the late summer of 1994. The Commission and Council were distributed copies of the Final Draft Plan on February 28, 1995 for review and comment. The Advisory Commission, absent any comments, recommended the adoption of the Plan at the March 1995 Commission meeting. Review/approval by the Met Council as the City's comprehensive city plan for parks ISSUES: There are no known issues relative to the Parks System Plan. BACKGROUND/ATTACHMENTS: None • • KV:cm - Agenda Information Memo April 18, 1995 Eagan City Council Meeting • D. RECOMMENDATION, AIRPORT RELATIONS COMMISSION/ COMMENTS ON FAA PART 150 PROGRAM ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: To approve comments on proposed revisions of the FAA Part 150 program. FACTS: . The FAA has requested comments on a potential change in the federal Part 150 Program eligibility standards such that "new" non-compatible land uses built after a specific date would not be eligible for Part 150 noise abatement treatment. ISSUES: • Whether federal Part 150 programs. should provide improvements to new non-compatible structures which have been allowed to locate within the 65 DNL contour. BACKGROUND/ATTACHMENTS: • Staff memorandum on page Cv • Proposed correspondence on page 7 7Y,$q011'14-, ry�Ik k�ii� 4 w MEMO _city ea of an 9 TO: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES FROM: ASSISTANT TO THE CITY ADMINISTRATOR HOHENSTEIN DATE: APRIL 13, 1995 -- SUBJECT: COMMENTS ON PROPOSED REVISIONS OF FAA PART 150 PROGRAM ELIGIBILITY GUIDELINES At its meeting of April 11, the Airport Relations Commission considered a notice for comment in the Federal Register regarding a proposed change in the federal Part 150 Program. The proposed change is intended to discourage the development of new non- compatible land uses withing the 65 DNL contour which is eligible for Part 150 funding. The Commission is supportive of this concept provided that it applies to areas for which a current Part 150 program is approved, so that cities would not be able to sound insulate new buildings which they permit in a known 65 DNL area. The Commission stated however that nothing in the Part 150 Program should preclude new development outside of the existing contour. The Commission asserted that if changes in operations or expansion of the airport subsequently exposes new areas to noise above 65 DNL, they should be eligible for Part 150 assistance as well. The Commission is recommending that the attached comments be submitted in this regard. Comments are due on Wednesday, April 19, 1995. Assi'l ant to the City Administrator lD • • city of aagan THOMAS EGAN Mayor • - PATRICIA AWADA April 19 1995 SHAWN HUNTER p SANDRA A.MASIN THEODORE WACHTER Council Members FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION THOMAS HEDGES OFFICE OF CHIEF COUNSEL, ATTN: RULES DOCKET (AGC-10) CiyAdrninistrator DOCKET NO. 28149 800 INDEPENDENCE AVE S.W. - ROOM 915G E.J. VAN OVERBEKE WASHINGTON, DC 20591 CHy Clerk To whom it may concern: Th City of Eagan, Minnesota supports the concept of prohibiting Part 150 funding for the remediation of noise impacts for new noncompatible development. This is subject to the qualification • that noncompatible uses should be eligible for remediation if expansion of the airport growth or changes in operations brings n w ar as into the 65 DNL contour. The policy should discourage new noncompatible development in known 65 DNL impact areas, but should not exclude homes from eligibility, regardless of their age, if they are exposed to new noise. With that qualification, the City is supportive of Alternative 4 f th proposed policy such that the FAA "retain the present policy with respect to Part 150 approval, but eliminate federal funding ligibility for remedial measures for new noncompatible d velopment." If you have any questions in this regard, please do not hesitat to contact us. Sincerely, Thomas L. Hedges City Administrator • cc: Steve Vecchio Metropolitan Airports Commission • • J MUNICIPAL CENTER THE LONE OAK TREE MAINTENANCE FACILITY 5830 PILOT KNOB ROAD 3501 COACHMAN POINT EAGAN,MINNESOTA 55122-1897 THE SYMBOL OF STRENGTH AND GROWTH IN OUR COMMUNITY EAGAN,MINNESOTA 55122 PHONE:(612)681.4600 PHONE:(612)681.4300 FAX(612)681.4612 Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer • FAX(612)681.4360 TDD:(612)4544535 f ] TDD:(612)454.8535 Agenda Information Memo April 18, 1995 Eagan City Council Meeting E. CHANGE ORDER. POLICE DEPARTMENT BUILDING PROJECT ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: To approve change orders totaling $6,441 for the Police Department building project. FACTS: Six change orders have been reviewed and are in order for consideration by the City Council at this time. ATTACHMENTS: • Staff memorandum and change orders on pages through /S • I'I • kjl',��IAI V' ' u AI'' " hC H MEMO _city of eagan TO: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES FROM: ASSISTANT TO THE CITY ADMINISTRATOR HOHENSTEIN DATE: APRIL 11, 1995 SUBJECT: POLICE DEPARTMENT-MUNICIPAL CENTER EXPANSION CHANGE ORDERS Attached are copies of six change orders for the building expansion project. The change represents a net addition to the contract price in the amount of $6,441.00. They are detailed as follows: 1. McGuire Mechanical - Change Order #4/pco #46 - Relocate gas service as required by utility company - $1,379.00. 2. McGuire Mechanical- Change Order#6/pco #74- Cabinet modifications- $0.00. ..3. McGuire Mechanical - Change Order #7/pco #75 - Add tempering valve and piping for shower due to manufacturer's changes in specified products-$1,252.00. 4. McGuire Mechanical - Change Order #8/pco #82 - Add roof drain at main entrance and connect to rain water system - $2,209.00. 5. Primary Equipment -Change Order #2/pcl #78 - Paint, reuse and add flashing to existing lockers in lieu of new locker purchase - $1,201.00. 6. Avalon Systems - Change Order #1/pco #81 - Add floor grilles to dispatch area to improve ventilation of cabling cavaties - $400.00. These items have been reviewed by the staff and consultants and are in order for consideration by the City Council at this time. Asst t to a City Administrator CHANGE ORDER PCO No.46 - PROJECT: City of Eagan CHANGE ORDER NUMBER: 04 Police Facility Eagan,Minnesota INITIATION DATE: December 8, 1994. TO CONTRACTOR ARCHITECT'S PROJECT NO: 624.A • • McGuire Mechanical Services,Inc. CONSTRUCTION MANAGER'S PROJECT NO: 9423 P.O. Box 21$ 20830 Holt Avenue So. CONTRACT FOR: Bid Division 22:Plumbing • Lakeville,MN 55044 CONTRACT DATE June 22, 1994 You are directed to make the following changes in this Contact o Provide all work associated with the following item(s)stated in Bulletin No.7,dated August 19, 1994: • Revisions to mechanical plans, entry level ADD $0.00 Provide all work associated with the following item(s)stated in Bulletin No. 11,dated September 16, 1994: • Revisions to mechanical plans, entry level,upper level,B04, and roof. ADD $0.00 o Provide all work associated with the following item(s)stated in Bulletin No. 13, dated September 29, 1994,as your . proposal dated October 4, 1994: •Change fixture F-14, in the detention area shower,to Acorn model 1741-3-M FA HCP. ADD 40.00 o Provide all work associated with the following items)stated in Bulletin No. 14,dated September 28, 1994: • Revise beam detail 25/9.4 per Rid 1. ADD $0.00 o Provide all work associated with the following item(s)stated in Clarification No.21,dated October 11, 1994,as per your proposal dated October 25, 1994: ./' • Add 8-4"clean outs. ie . ADD 1-;5 2;7fu 40 Provide all work associated with the following item(s)stated in Bulletin No. 18, dated October 10, 1994, as per your (C• proposal dated November 17, 1994: • Relocate 1-12"gas main in ceiling space,weld up fittings. ADD $1.379.00� TOTAL 9510` $1,371.00 Not valid until signed by the Owner,the Architect and the Construction Manager. Signature of the Contractor indicates agreement herewith,including any adjustment in the Contract Sum or the Contract time. The Original Contract Sum was $ 152,000.00 Net change by previously authorized Change Orders .. $ 20,230.00 The Contract Sum prior to this Change Order $ 172,230.00 The Contract Sum will be increased by this Change Order $ 2,908.00 The new Contract Sum including this Change Order Will be $ 175,138.00 The Contract Time will be unchanged by (0)Days The Date of Substantial Completion as of the date of this Change Order therefore is per original contract. Jtecommended by Construction Manager kmmroved by Architect E&V, Incorporated Thorbeck Architects Minneapolis,MN Minneapolis,MN By: l ' T°1` By Date: /a. q/9`t Date: V26/96- • greed to by Conttiuxor Authorized by Owner ..rsa:: -1 Services City of Eagan At Fagan, MN Qkeu, de.f 411011 • • By:_ Pr PiW, ` By: Date: 1 3 °t . Date: • / _. -- -- _ _ "---"_ CHANGE ORDER . PCO No.74 PROJECT: City of Eagan CHANGE ORDER NUMBER: 06 Police Facility Eagan,Minnesota INITIATION DATE: February 27, 1995 TO CONTRACTOR: ARCHITECT'S PROJECT NO: 624.A • - . McGuire Mechanical Services,Inc. . CONSTRUCTION MANAGER'S PROJECT NO: 9423 P.O.Box 218 20830 Holt Avenue So. CONTRACT FOR: Bid Division 22:Plumbing Lakeville,MN 55044 - CONTRACT DATE: lime 22, 1994 You are directed to make the following changes in this Contract: • Provide all work associated with the following items)stated in Clarification No.32,dated December 28, 1994: • Change cabinet to semi recess. TOTAL • $0.00 �. • Not valid until signed by the Owner,the Architect and the Construction Manager. Signature of the Contractor indicates agreement herewith, including any adjustment in the Contract Sum or the Contract time. The Original Contract Sum was $ 152,000.00 Net change by previously authorized Change Ordeis $ 23,776.00 The Contract Sum prior to this Change Order $ 175,776.00 The Contract Sum will be increased by this Change Order $ 0.00 The new Contract Sum including this Change Order will be $ 175,776.00 The Contract Time will be unchanged by (0)Days The Date of Substantial Completion as of the date of this Change Order therefore is per original contract. Recommended by construction Manager Approved bv_Architect E&V, Incorporated Thorbeck Architects Minneapolis,MN Minneapolis,MN By:- -40/P_` � By: 1 W Date: 3/a/ii 5 . Date: 4/IV/4G . 6areed to by Contractor Authorized by Owner ;.,� echanical Services City of Eagan .1' 1 g ,MN • By ,�� �►�i L By: ' Date:-'MW, Date: - By Date: • • // __. • CHANGE ORDER PCO No. 75 PROJECT: City of Eagan CHANGE ORDER NUMBER: 07 Police Facility Eagan,Minnesota. INITIATION DATE: February 27, 1995 TO CONTRACTOR ARCHITECT'S PROJECT NO: 624.A McGuire Mechanical Services,Inc. CONSTRUCTION MANAGER'S PROJECT NO: 9423 P.O.Box 218 20830 Holt Avenue So. CONTRACT FOR: Bid Division 22:Plumbing Lakeville,MN 55044 CONTRACT DATE: June 22, 1994 You are directed to make the following changes in this Contract: o Provide all work associated with the following iteip(s)stated in Bulletin No.24,dated January 4, 1995: • Add tempering valve with necessary piping for F-1S shower. ADD $1252.00 TOTAL $1252.00 Not valid until signed by the Owner, the Architect and the Construction Manager. Signature of the Contractor indicates agreement herewith, including any adjustment in the Contract Sum or the Contract time. The Original Contract Sum was S 152,000.00 Net change by previously authorized Change Orders S 23,776.00 The Contract Sum prior to this Change Order S 175,776.00 The Contract Sum will be increased by this Change Order S 1252.00 The new Contract Sum including this Change Order will be S 177,028.00 The Contract Time will be unchanged by (0)Days The Date of Substantial Completion as of the date of this Change Order therefore is per original contract. Jtecommended by onsrtruction Manager Approved by Architect E&V, Incorporated Thorbeck Architects Minneapolis,MN Minneapolis,MN By: /h P5h.x...e— By: 'D.W Date: 3j.D f 9 S Date: 4-/topic Agreed to by Contractor - Authorized by Owner M. • Mechanical Services City of Eagan i , man,MN By: P 71- By. Date: L Date: Date: • /g%2 CHANGE ORDER PCO No. 82 PROJECT: City of Eagan CHANGE ORDER NUMBER: 08 MAR 8 1 5 Police Facility Eagan,Minnesota INITIATION DATE: March 1, 1995 TO CONTRACTOR ARCHITECTS PROJECT NO: 624.A • McGuire Mechanical Services,Inc. CONSTRUCTION MANAGER'S PROJECT NO: 9423 P.O. Box 218 20830 Holt Avenue So. CONTRACT FOR: Bid Division 22:Plumbing Lakeville,MN 55044 CONTRACT DATE June 22,,1994 You are directed to make the following changes in this Contract: Provide all work associated with the following item(s)stated in Bulletin No.30,dated February 14, 1995: • Add 3"rain water leader and roof drain at lobby,pipe to existing 5"RWL per Bulletin No.30, option#2. - ADD $2.209.00 TOTAL $2,209.00 Not valid until signed by the Owner,the Architect and the Construction Manager. Signature of the • Contractor indicates agreement herewith, including any adjustment in the Contract Sum or the Contract time. The Original Contract Sum was $ 152,000.00 Net change by previously authorized Change Orders 5 25,028.00 The Contract Sum prior to this Change Order $ 177,028.00 The Contract Sum will be increased by this Change Order 5 2,209.00 The new Contract Sum including this Change Order will be $ 179,237.00 The Contract Time will be unchanged by (0)Days The Date of Substantial Completion as of the date of this Change Order therefore is per original contract. jtecommeiided by Construction Manager 1pproved by Architect E&V, Incorporated Thorbeck Architects Minneapolis,MN Minneapolis,MN By: �P 'P By: .U0dititk�+ Date: - -`lS Date: t}10/45 • Agreed to by Contractor Authorized by Owner • McG .1 Mechanical Services City of Eagan,g1\ B r B . . Date: 3 LM ' . Date: • By Date: • /j • CHANGE ORDER PCO No.78 . PROJECT: City of Eagan CHANGE ORDER NUMBER: 02 Police Facility Eagan,Minnesota INITIATION DATE: February 27, 1995 • TO CONTRACTOR: ARCHITECT'S PROJECT NO: 624.A Primary Equipment CONSTRUCTION MANAGER'S PROJECT NO: 9423 6420 West Lake Street St.Louis Park,MN 55426 CONTRACT FOR: Bid Division 18:Lockers&Beaches CONTRACT DATE: Nov 01, 1994 • You are directed to make the following changes in this Contract: o Provide all work associated with the following item(s)as per-FCA No.27 dated February 14, 1994: • Remove, electrostat paint(outside only), and reinstall lockers and benches at New Police Department in Room 136(Tact Team). - • Existing hardware to be reused. There are 14.188 lockers,therefore a filler panel will be required. ADD 8540.00 Provide all work associated with the following item(s)as per FCA No.30 dated February 16, 1994: . • Add trim at top of lockers to cover the concrete masonry units. - . . . ADD $661.00 • TOTAL $1201.00 Not valid until signed by the Owner the Architect and the Construction Manager. Signature of the Contractor indicates agreement .. herewith, including any adjustment in the Contract Sum or the Contract time. . The Original Contract Sum was 8 39,000.00 Net change by previously authorized Change Orders .. 8 (5,250.00) The Contract Sum prior to this Change Order 8 33,750.00 The Contract Sum will be increased by this Change Order 8 1201.00 The new Contract Sum including this Change Order will be 8 34,951.00 The Contract Tlme will be unchanged by (0)Days The Date of Substantial Completion as of the date of this Change Order therefore is per original contract. Jtecommended by Construction Manager Approved by Architect E&V,Incorporated Thorbeck Architects • Minneapolis,MN Minneapolis,MN By: r By: V. laidn„,,..�..� Date: /a 9s Date: 4 so/4G Agreed to by Contractor A.nthorlaed by Owner Primary Equipment City of Eagan • St.Louis Park,MN Eagan,MN By: 1 By: Date: 3—7—V' Date: By: Date: • ^ _A • • CHANGE ORDER • PCO No.81 PROJECT: City of Eagan CHANGE ORDER NUMBER: 01 Police Facility MAR 8 1995 Fagan,Minnesota INITIATION DATE: February 28, 1995 TO CONTRACTOR: ARCHITECTS PROJECT NO: 624.A Avalon Systems,Inc. " CONSTRUCTION MANAGER'S PROJECT NO: 9423 1601 67th Avenue N. ' • Brooklyn Center,MN 55430 CONTRACT FOR: Bid Division 20:Access Floor CONTRACT DATE June 22, 1994 You are directed to make the following changes in this Contract o Provide all work associated with the following item(s)stated in Bulletin No.30, dated February 14, 1994: • Furnish and install ten(10)6"x 8"aluminum air grilles,without adjustable dampers,in Room 113 and 115,as located by the Architect. ADD $400.00 Not valid until signed by the Owner,the Architect and the Construction Manager. Signature of the Contractor indicates agreement herewitk including any adjustment in the Contract Sum or the Contract time. The Original Contract Sum was $ 6,903.00 Net change by previously authorized Change Orders .. S 0.00 The Contract Sum prior to this Change Order S 6,903.00 The Contract Sum will be increased by this Change Order S 400.00 The new Contract Sum including this Change Order will be S 7,303.00 The Contract Time will be unchanged by (0)Days The Date of Substantial Completion as of the date of this Change Order therefore is per original contract. Recommended by Construction Manager Aparoved by Architect E&V, Incorporated Thorbec]c Architects Minneapolis,MN Minneapolis,MN By: YKG' By:_ Att1424.-...-- Date: 3 -9-5` Date: 4llola c Agreed to by Contractor ' ,Authorized by Owner .. BtutleyCgats - = Avalon Systems, Inc-.._._.._,___._.City of Eagan-- ----..._._ St r Centex M : F� nn mN • By: Bruce Saline By: Date: March 7, 1995 • Date: By: Date: • Agenda Information Memo April 18, 1995 F. VACATION OF PORTIONS OF PARCEL 47A. MNDOT RIGHT-OF-WAY PLAT#19-72 LYING WITHIN THE PROPOSED DEERWOOD TOWNHOMES ADDN ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: To receive the petition/schedule a public hearing for 7:00 p.m., on May 15, 1995,to vacate portions of Parcel 47A of the above-referenced MNDOT Right-of-Way Plat#19-72 FACTS: • The above-referenced portions of MnDOT Plat No. 19-72 have been turned over to the City. • Tract#1 and Tract#3 as identified on the attached exhibii are excess right-of-way. • Tract#2 as identified on the attached exhibit will be replaced with the appropriate drainage and utility easements with the final platting of the Deerwood Townhomes Addition. ISSUES: • Any issues pertaining to this vacation will be investigated during staff review and the public notice process and will be addressed at the public hearing. • Whereas Tract #3 and Tract #1 can be vacated regardless of the timing of the final plat approval for the proposed Deerwood Townhomes Addition, the vacation of Tract #2 is contingent upon the Deerwood Townhomes final plat providing the appropriate drainage and utility easements to accommodate the storm sewer currently protected by Tract#2. ATTACHMENTS: • Site plan showing the locations of the proposed vacations.f • /6 • 1 jc • Ha- , • . ....... . ,, 1 �/ , •/ ' w r oTwta.ITr Sr /sw :•.ear iRill/ t J.' IMR o . i.•IOC . 1'4*. + �y Z I'i2S:`-;• \/�\���y� -�.MMtYt'•1.•' j• ? .�pyrGGG}GTTTyy ammo I • . fJ / - �7/ 7•,.... •.. ,..... . 1 I 1E71 . i_c • N ., . q� *VCR I is = / �f , . . ./ . . . :,......9' ° i aLu • I i r/e�lurcvr sAGGirr I� + 1 NW /'� NEi� NW 1 Tre-- •"Ej• on P601.111 , r P �� . �' _ �.4. ,,t ` _ = 1' •fir \. EA ',6ii _ 7 hT ,`, -1 lsralou a .i. • \::- - \II._u;; s i VP ZL + I•• ' .•.I • Gu1to\, V r mums `�, . ,,• I h — y Y. g IS - �Sla "� G TI n ri i � 41.". ...14 i.-' t.% , • *1 t• - sGSf1 � J t . ' ./ ,,s 1,,,' .; � r j rT A a• I; 4 . 1 iw,.'},. s�� 1 Atom, wt. 7 Y may' ��•' Ky . 5`,c'!'!'.!' %..,0,„*. I n ® •ava ' •` ��l Z�Ir' i;.•�• ar 1 IT'S . =•£°Mrk:. , ..� •. w � ' r• L-w+[sro ra' LP: 11 f *Off wvGw`t t an ' ail,..?21,••'• ^`=.. S•.r.7.`IA mK " • M w ,• \, It•.T a e .a����::il 1, >••CT ;.A/ Y� •E PTIa00t PT. ` . ) a C� /: �1 a�•,,�w1 ■ II1YCW I MU— f7�., I; (v 1 _j 1_ - .•k,Tta' 1 f / . 1 , r; • it I r yr i .1. ./, • �� 11 I 1 �. _ _.1 ;,_.1,,, A. • .. .•• • • L Nwif , Di ti/i:''a 1.41 - trite. r Allan;-111*. s Vii/ '' . _ ••I' ; y •••• • VACATION REQUEST SITE • ' • City of eagan - VACATION REQUEST . • . approved: standard r_.k:.•' PUBLIC plate : . r WORKS • HIGHWAY EASEMENT . 't'... L DEPARTME • • 17 \ . . \ • \ i 1 ID \ M m • \ w ; � O\ T 4. t.s f F ^ -0_ Z a' \ ' \ W O m \ (WIW�a. aao \ WQZ <1 i I '\.°\10 • < 1" ' \ O 7\ t M f-1- 6._A'\ yi. \ • V6\ ' ■ r� W. \ • I 1% \ . I \ , . 0 . \ r r- 4- 'L';' \ 1 `_ ' 4 '_:0.` 'L d ` ` :. 1 \ • 1 9SOtt co .rt•9bt t \ \ �D Z O J . 1 • 0.4 o .� 1 W j W V\ \ \ T i ii F. I i x t- i .' \ 6; A f ` �� Ov 1 V V \ 62. ‘,,,-, It p Or / 1 . \ \ \ . \. �� 1 \ 1 r 1 I r . - .t Agenda Information Memo Apri118, 1995 G.PROJECT 686,RECEIVE PETITION/AUTHORIZE PREPARATION OF FEASIBILITY REPT(WOODGATE LANE- STS. & UTILITIES) ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: To receive the above-referenced petition and authorize preparation of an engineering feasibility report and simultaneous preparation of detailed plans and specifications. FACTS: • The current City CIP(1995-1999)identifies the reconstruction of Woodgate Lane for 1997. • The proposed Mallard Park 4th Addition would require at least 7 street openings in Woodgate Lane to provide the necessary utility service to the proposed subdivision. • The property owner in his petition to the City has waived his rights to the public hearing and requested that detailed plans and specifications be prepared simultaneously and has also guaranteed their respective costs if the project is not awarded. ISSUES: • Since the reconstruction of Woodgate Lane is scheduled in the City's 5-Year Capital Improvement Program for 1997, the requested improvements would accelerate the section of Woodgate.Lane adjacent to the proposed Mallard Park 4th Addition from 1997 to the 1995 construction season. The construction of the proposed improvements in Woodgate Lane would cause the street reconstruction assessments to the southerly adjacent properties in accordance with the City's current special assessment policy for reconstruction of residential roadways. ATTACHMENTS: • Petition signed by the property owner. f. "2 4" • Exhibit showing the construction limits and affected property owners. 10. . -/ • • /9 • . FOR CITY USE ONLY Si, - Petition # . tog& - 4 .. ; Date Received . Presented to Council 4—rg..g • • I .s • l - -- - PETITION - LOCATION/SUBDIVISION Mallard Park 4th, Johnny Cake Ridge Road I/We, the undersigned, owners of the real property adjacent to woodgate Lane (Street) or Within Fronting Mallard Park 4th proposed Subdivision, - hereby petition for:. _ • , . Street Improvements x - -- ---• -Sarsitar Sewer •---- ----. ---.--x - ---..'""`"'"• -- -_, —; - - - .__ . • • . ':.• Y; • (Check requested items and . ' : : • ' Water Supply:. .. - . •. -_. : =X . _.. please enclose sketch of - • '1- - • requested improvements) • • Storm Sewer x . Streetlights x . • - • Other (Explain) _ . Reconstruct existing systems - I/We understand that this petition does not in itself request the installation of these improvements,'but rather, request the preparation of a feasibility report in which the estimated costs of these improvements will be tabulated. I/We understand that upon receipt of this petition and the preparation of the ' requested feasibility report, a public hearing will be held at which time we may voice our support or opposition based on the costs as prepared in said feasibility report. . if the requested improvements are denied for construction at the time of public hearing, I/we hereby guarantee payment for all costs incurred in the preparation of this feasibility report. . Signature of Land Owner - -Address of Property - • - -- 2. . , :, ._ . . . I/We hereby waive our rights to the public hearing and request that detail plans and specifications be prepared simultaneous d also guarantee their respective costs if the project is not awarded. • - i '• W . efl ature) - . . ' (Signature) • • - fts#t feasdevfm ■ • • ■ It CO CD O 1.1 r1 di V 0 'I N I • a.► a U) . _e. co 1 if a N 1 • O• • • O 14 a •(—3 F, z = -...� 1 } Y _ •--._ ........_.. _mom_ _ _.-•- ... e�j .......` 1 W C iftr---...2004,. � .`` '/i CC •••••46 ilillibi ,W '4Z;*/ X 't ts i 7 _ Ii...4.10• , • / �%� :,,% � � ' ' ..,4-.1,. saiii'' ' -",*t 1314ww.kriy-i::::p •,,- ,A ‘,, •!•; i : I 111 "r � � F Y \ is : : L lit t. y�—— . : ; 1 ::.A R A �.__h•1 , ,�, . / S'` i ♦ 3 1 NMI ff�1 .!f• ipt l• '.+, °• o k r_ 1i rii∎:•±, iii ;rr' 'p 1 � irili= rii Jo fi al® a. .0'..::::i. ?_,-- , �-----i a' 111a:: II' tiZ d! i I NI 1` .'.�i� s* 11,1 # '1 11i la 1i '= '• i iiil�ij S,1 -: :. Val lac. \001. 1§11,_. ....‘,.. .::::.:;:sr--r-?'-...:::_—_ .4; u i ... 111169 ' % /).A \—-----..". --lmig- iiiiiis .. .. i •4. ' 1.1.. -.11'.1t124. . 4‘ :t. •114,:...,.. Y ei .,� s•' t .. 'S' • r .• ' ' a ti •'% , 1 I 4)y / ; . I I . N'• I17 :mot .� `�;y / ` , :._... Z. Agenda Information Memo April 18, 1995 Eagan City Council Meeting H. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - SHABA JOHNSON ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: To approve or deny a Conditional Use Permit for Shaba Johnson to conduct a beauty parlor in her home at 1594 Rustic Hills Drive subject to the six conditions recommended by the Advisory Planning Commission. FACTS: • The Advisory Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on this matter at its meeting of March 28, 1995. • There were no issues raised with this proposal and the Advisory Planning Commission recommends approval subject to six conditions. ISSUES: None BACKGROUND/ATTACHMENTS: (2) " Minutes of the APC - page a3 Staff report - page o7 —p7� • C3 • Page 11 March 28,1995 ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT-SHABA JOHNSON Chairperson Miller opened the next public hearing of the evening regarding a Conditional Use Permit to allow a beauty parlor in an R-1 (Single Family) district for Lot 15, Rustic Hills Addition located in the SW' of Section 4, east of Highway 13 on Rustic Hills Drive. Project Planner Ridley introduced this item. Mr. Ridley highlighted the information presented in the City staffs planning report dated March 9, 1995. Mr. Ridley noted the conditions of a beauty parlor conditional use permit and advised that the applicant is agreeable to each of the conditions. Mr, Ridley further stated that the proposed use meets the conditional standards under the City Code. The applicant, Shaba Johnson, was present but had no comment. Member Heyl stated that the proposed use has minimal intrusion of commercial use in a residential district. Member Segal moved, Heyl seconded, a motion to recommend approval of a Conditional Use Permit to allow a beauty parlor in an R-1 (Single Family) district for Lot 15, Rustic Hills Addition located in the SW'/+ of Section 4, east of Highway 13 on Rustic Hills Drive, subject to the following conditions: 1. The applicant shall record this Conditional Use Permit at the Dakota County Recorder's office within sixty days of City Council action. 2. Hours of operation shall be from 8:00 A.M.to 8:30 P.M. only. 3. The only employee shall be an occupant of the household. 4. The parking shall be on-site and limited to two(2)customer vehicles. 5. There shall be no commercial signs advertising the business. 6. There shall be no over-the-counter sales of merchandise. All approved in favor. a3 PLANNING REPORT CITY OF EAGAN REPORT DATE: March 9, 1995 CASE #: 4-CU-2-2-95 APPLICANT: Shaba Johnson HEARING DATE: March 28, 1995 PROPERTY OWNER: David and Shaba Johnson PREPARED BY: Mike Ridley REQUEST: Conditional Use Permit (Beauty Parlor) LOCATION: 1594 Rustic Hills Drive (SW 1/4 Section 4) COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: D-I, Single Family ZONING: R-1, Single Family SUMMARY OF REQUEST Shaba Johnson is requesting approval of a Conditional Use Permit to allow her to operate a beauty parlor out of the lower level of her home located on Lot 15,Rustic Hills Addition at 1594 Rustic Hills Drive. AUTHORITY FOR REVIEW City Code Section 11.40, Subd. 4, states that The Planning Commission shall recommend a conditional use permit and the Council shall issue such conditional use permits only if it finds that such use at the proposed location: A. Will not be detrimental to or endanger the public health, safety, or general welfare of the neighborhood or the City. B. Will be harmonious with the general and applicable specific objectives of the Comprehensive Plan and City Code provisions. • C. Will be designed, constructed, operated and maintained so as to be compatible in appearance with the existing or intended character of the general vicinity and will not change the essential character of that area, nor substantially iminish or impair property values within the neighborhood. D. Will be served adequately by essential public facilities and services,including streets, police and fire protection, drainage structures, refuse disposal, water and sewer systems and schools. E. Will not involve uses, activities, processes, materials, equipment and conditions of C9 41( ' Planning Report - Shaba Johnson CUP March 28, 1995 Page 2 operation that will be hazardous or detrimental to any persons, property or the general welfare because of excessive production of traffic,noise,smoke,fumes,glare or odors. EVALUATION OF REQUEST The City Code lists Beauty parlor as conditional use in the R-1 zoning district, subject to the following conditions. (a) Hours of operation shall be from 8:00 A.M. to 8:30 P.M. only. (b) The only employee shall be an occupant of the household. (c) The parking shall be on-site and limited to two (2) customer vehicles. (d) There shall be no commercial signs advertising the business... (e) There shall be no over-the-counter sales of merchandise. The applicant is agreeable to each of these conditions. The Johnson's home is located in a developed single family neighborhood. According to Mrs. Johnson, she anticipates an average number of 5 clients per week. SUMMARY/CONCLUSION Provided the conditions listed in the City Code are observed and the average amount of weekly customers is 5, this proposal will be consistent with the Conditional Use findings stated earlier. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED To recommend approval/denial of Conditional Use Permit to allow a beauty parlor in the home at 1594 Rustic Hills Drive, on Lot 15, Rustic Hills Addition. Approval subject to the conditions listed below. 1. The applicant shall record this Conditional Use Permit at the Dakota County Recorder's office within sixty days of City Council action. 2. Hours of operation shall be from 8:00 A.M. to 8:30 P.M. only. 3. The only employee shall be an occupant of the household. • • P1 n� Report• Shaba Johnson CUP March 28, 1995 Page 3 4. • The parking shall be on-site and limited to two (2) customer vehicles. 5. There shall be no commercial signs advertising the business: • 6. There shall be no over-the-counter sales of merchandise. • FINANCIAL OBLIGATION• 4-CU•2-2-95 Lot 15,Rustic Hills There are pay-off balances of special assessments totaling SO on the parcels for which the conditional use is requested. At this time, there are pending assessments on the parcel for which the conditional use permit is requested. The estimated financial obligation presented is subject to change based upon areas,dimensions and land uses contained in the final plat. Based upon the study of the financial obligations collected in the past and the uses proposed for the property,the following charges are proposed. The charges are computed using the City's existing • fee schedule and the connections proposed to be made to the City's utility system based on the submitted plans. Improvement Use Rate Quantity Amount None Total • �,Q • - • f(&- ''.• . F r 1111 . .• Nw 111111,1iir ' ar. . ` :, • ` l lip _ y� 4 Me 1 / I •K �- tll�t�y AM'• • • R } ® ■.11r . r . r ,„r„ .��,�� i ►-:— fit; 1 0 41411,41611-"■_, ---;- . . It • 0 • LW, 141-• "- LI ,... .:‘,,,ki. I . ... _ . ........\0; . ..,:. . ,,,,, 1..., ic ci ii, -As . ,. 1..".3' i 1 •k q IMP=Pt t 7 . , : 1 ; i PZIPP I 211 Miff . 1 ... ' *.MILST 111:1144 i O.II.y l r.rwa R. 0 Fri . : / ,,./. 1 , ..,:k ,,... . 1 ad 50.- -. ,7 -....,_,. .., ._, IS IMO... ls.. . .: • I: 49 . 06,0 . • •- _ 4:, COM 0 1 .- \NI!!\ : / .., . •' I: jeatn:affri'SO e_1,44‘4- r- 4414.'"1116 gril ,;( ''4"81- 1:471;34 ,... vir AWLS • =III I e AAj. iiiiihik ,711.41: .:r_..,,.a;:: ray caws. . r' r 4 ‘_ =____., 1-( -. •.,' • .- *1111"111111. -E. . :'4,;::: !-.3. : Ill -4). .l.":ife ..• i .4%) \\,. g. an .,,,,i; _ ..v.111t,•%7 ..j.., ....70101... • *I. „.is,...,1...zilir..... . ... ••• - 1 .i'... ' . Pill& t--11..&\ Feik‘ _Az, . 1 ........_ l_egie&.. _ , . m4 1 ,— -Asjia-...'1.•"41 s -.. ..• t:, sorm....-46- . Imo,a, .j - ' f act'awi � •.... '� .�, ?%�. rat ... iE'(rL`r�r_"" l NE ...'- IiipT, � ` s ~C le; -x *i!�_-/�� syp i - ,/if.-.• . - LOCATION . . .. . • . . • . . • . . . . .. .. • . • • • . , . a .7 ,t • • • Agenda Information Memo April 18, 1995 Eagan City Council Meeting L CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT- JOHNSON'S RICHFIELD & BLACKTOP • ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: To approve or deny a Conditional Use Permit.to allow an automobile service facility in a GB zoning district on Lot 5, Block 3, Letendre Second Addition located east of Highway 13, north of Letendre Street at 3206 Sibley Memorial Highway. FACTS: • • The Advisory Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on this matter at its meeting of March 28, 1995. • The Advisory Planning Commission recommends approval subject to four conditions. ISSUES: None • BACKGROUND/ATTACHMENTS: (2) Minutes of APC meeting - page 2q 3o Staff report - page - Page 12 March 28, 1995 ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT JOHNSON'S RICHFIELD &BLACKTOP Chairperson Miller opened the next public hearing of the evening regarding a Conditional Use Permit to allow an auto accessory sales and service facility in a GB (General Business) district for Lot 5, Block 3, Letendre 2nd Addition located in the SW%4 of Section 9 on Sibley Memorial Highway. Project Planner Ridley introduced this item. Mr. Ridley highlighted the information presented in the City staffs planning report dated March 10, 1995. Mr. Ridley noted the background and history, the existing condition and the surrounding uses of the subject property. Mr. Ridley noted that the applicant's request is to allow installation and service of automobile and light truck accessories. Mr. Ridley further noted that auto accessory sales are a permitted use in a General Business zoning district; whereas motor vehicle repair and service is a conditional use. The applicant, John Johnson, was present but gave no comment. In response to Chairman Miller's inquiry, Mr. Ridley stated that the surrounding neighbors of the proposed use were noticed on the conditional use permit application and that the applicant did speak with them. Neighboring resident, Ron Miller, was present at the hearing and stated he had no objection to the application. Member Wallace moved, Heyl seconded, a motion to recommend approval of a Conditional Use Permit to allow an auto accessory sales and service facility in a GB (General Business) district for Lot 5, Block 3, Letendre 2nd Addition located in the SW1/4 of Section 9 on Sibley Memorial Highway, subject to the following conditions: 1.The applicant shall record the conditional use permit at the Dakota County recorder's office within 60 days of Council approval. 2. The installation and repair service shall be provided only for automobiles and trucks with a payload rating of three-quarter-ton or less. 3. There shall be no outdoor storage of vehicles, equipment or supplies associated with the auto&truck service. 4. All installation or repair service shall take place within the principal building only. Member Thurston expressed his concern that the subject property was designated under the Comprehensive Guide Plan as D-1 (Residential) and therefore the Commission 69 Page 13 March 28,1995 ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION must consider long-term use of the property and whether the property will continue with commercial uses. Member Miller stated that the subject property, however, was zoned General Business and therefore the proposed use was permissible with the a conditional use permit. Member Carlson noted that the subject property has completed several improvements and has been cleaned up extensively meeting the area residents'concerns. All approved in favor. • 3v PLANNING REPORT CITY OF EAGAN REPORT DATE: March 10, 1995 CASE #: 9-CU-3-2-95 APPLICANT: Johnson's Richfield Blacktop HEARING DATE: March 28, 1994 PROPERTY OWNER: John D.Johnson PREPARED BY: Mike Ridley REQUEST: Conditional Use Permit (Auto Service Facility) LOCATION: 3206 Sibley Memorial Highway (SW 1/4 Section 9) COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: D-I, Single Family (0-3 units/acre) ZONING: General Business (GB) SUMMARY OF REQUEST The Johnson are requesting approval of a Conditional Use Permit to allow an automobile service facility in a GB zoning district on Lot 5,Block 3,Letendre 2nd Addition located east of Highway 13, just north of Letendre Street at 3206 Sibley Memorial Highway. The proposed service facility will be in addition to the existing blacktop and landscape business. AUTHORITY FOR REVIEW City Code Section 11.40, Subd. 4, states that The Planning Commission shall recommend a conditional use permit and the Council shall issue such conditional use permits only if it finds that such use at the proposed location: A. Will not be detrimental to or endanger the public health, safety, or general welfare of the neighborhood or the City. B. Will be harmonious with the general and applicable specific objectives of the Comprehensive Plan and City Code provision. . • C. Will be designed, constructed, operated and maintained so as to be compatible in appearance with the existing or intended character of the general vicinity and will not change the essential character of that area, nor substantially diminish or impair • property values within the neighborhood. D. Will be served adequately by essential public facilities and services,including streets, police and fire protection, drainage structures, refuse disposal, water and sewer systems and schools. 3 1 Planning Report -Johnson CUP March 28, 1995 Page 2 E. Will not involve uses, activities, processes, materials, equipment and conditions of operation that will be hazardous or detrimental to any persons, property or the general welfare because of excessive production of traffic,noise,smoke,fumes,glare or odors. BACKGROUND/HISTORy r Letendre 2nd Addition was platted and zoned Single Family(R-1)in 1964.•Apparently,the building was constructed prior to 195(Tand operated as a country store for an undetermined amount of time. In 1966, Mr. George Huber acquired the property and the Town Board approved his requested rezoning from R-1 to Light Commercial (C-1). The Town Board also approved a CUP for a gasoline service station. When the Eagan Zoning Ordinance was revised in 1975,zoning districts were renamed and this particular property was designated General Business. Mr. Huber operated Country Standard for 16 years then sold (contract for deed) the property in 1982 to Tom Maclntyre who operated the facility as Country Rod&Worm until Mr.Huber foreclosed on the property in 1989. Since 1989 the vacant building became quite dilapidated and the City received numerous complaints mainly associated with loitering and illegal dumping. Around the middle of last year, Richfield Sod & Blacktop moved into the facility and proceeded to apply for CUP to allow outdoor storage of vehicles and landscape materials. On October 4, 1994, the City Council approved this CUP. 'This CUP was approved subject to the following conditions: 1. Submission and implementation of a landscape plan for the berm area north of the site and the area along Highway 13. 2. The applicant shall upgrade the parking and storage areas with a bituminous surface and bituminous curbing around the entire area, to be phased in over two years. 3. The applicant shall properly maintain all surfaced areas, curbing and premises.. 4. Customer parking spaces shall be striped and drive aisles delineated. 5. The applicant shall construct a berm along north property line and railroad tie/timber bins to screen the proposed storage. 6. Storage of vehicles,not to exceed 20,shall be located in the northeast portion of the property up against the hill. Dump trucks,pick up trucks, and sod truck and trailer will be permitted. One tractor trailer vehicle will be allowed. Planning Report -Johnson CUP March 28, 1995 _Page 3 7. The City shall inspect the site for compliance with the conditional use permit one year from the date the blacktop is put in and shall determine whether the storm drainage system is creating any erosion or other problems. As a result of this review, additional conditions may be imposed by the City Council. 8. The applicant shall record the conditional use permit at the Dakota County recorder's office within 60 days of Council approval. EXISTING CONDITIONS The property is currently zoned GB;however,the Land Use Guide Plan designates this area D-I, Single Family Residential. Since occupying the building last year, the Johnsons have made a number of interior and exterior building improvements as well as site improvements. Scheduled site improvements for 1995 include paving around the south and west sides of the building, striping parking areas and delineating drive areas, and submitting and implementing a landscape plan that is currently being prepared. At a minimum, these improvements will occur this year; however, the Johnsons will pave more of the site if possible. The 1 1/2 story service station has a building footprint of approximately 2,000 SF and is located in the northwestern portion of the site. The building has an existing two bay service area which includes two hydraulic lifts. SURROUNDING USES The following uses, zoning and comprehensive plan designations surround the subject property: North-Undeveloped; zoned R-4; and guided D-IV (+12 u/ac) South- Single Family homes; zoned R-1; guided D-I SF East - Single Family homes; zoned R-1; guided D-I SF West- Highway 13/Undeveloped property zoned and guided Industrial EVALUATION OF REOUEST The current request is to allow installation and service of auto and light truck accessories. Light truck is not defined in the City Code. For purposes of this application, light trucks shall be defined as a vehicle with a payload rating of three-quarter-ton or less. Auto _ accessory sales are listed as a permitted use in the GB zoning district; however, motor vehicle repair and service facilities are listed as a conditional use. According to the applicant, the accessory sales, installation, and service will not include any additional Planning Report -Johnson CUP March 28, 1995 Page 4 outdoor storage of vehicles or equipment because the installation and service work will take place within the existing building and consist only of same-day service. Compatibility With Surrounding Area -Johnson's blacktop and landscape business serves residential, commercial, and industrial customers while the proposed auto and light truck service business will only be provided to residential and light commercial vehicles. Although the site is adjacent to residential property,it also has frontage on Highway 13. The majority of the property contains a steep, heavily wooded, slope that provides a natural screen to surrounding residential land use. SAY/CONCLUSION According to the applicant, the proposed same-day repair and installation operation will take place entirely within the existing building and no additional outdoor storage will be required. limiting the work to automobiles and light trucks should also rrinimfre any impact to surrounding properties. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED To recommend approval/denial of a Conditional Use permit to allow a vehicle repair on Lot 5, Block 3, Letendre 2nd Addition located at 3206 Sibley Memorial Highway. Approval subject to the conditions listed below. 1. The applicant shall record the conditional use permit at the Dakota County recorder's office within 60 days of Council approval. 2. The installation and repair service shall be provided only for automobiles and trucks with a payload rating of three-quarter-ton or less. 3. There shall be no outdoor storage of vehicles, equipment or supplies associated with the auto & truck service. FINANCIAL OBLIGATION - 9-CU-3-2-95 Lot 5, Block 3, Letendre 2nd There are pay-off balances of special assessments totaling SO on the parcel for which the conditional use permit is requested. Based upon the study of the financial obligations collected in the past and the use proposed for the property,the following charges are proposed. The charge is computed using the City's current fee • schedule and the connection and availability of the City's utility system. Improvement Use Rate Quantity Amount Storm Sewer Trunk C/I .116 112,338 sq ft S13.031 Total S13.031 This financial obligation is presented for informational purposes and is not a condition of the conditional use permit. • • • • _ _ 3) • L'� _1J1—_....�J X.I. �, b It+.nDG[v.l� ,t/f.1,1!f 11 J., j�fN A t/�'ay � I •/i lit / 4)P.a In LJ /AICA ( / s / 1 -1./ 41.N MI1TM;I• .i '. �/.SW .• `i $E j $yy 1f�y+1 rits- ,,,„[ =T'' ' $W 44 1 '6• ,,, / �,•' 1111 I �t ii�� 1 ,(I 1,., �—_r/ • V IIAM'[ I 9, t. . E. , PILO r"tr v••••• • ‘k. il i A' NW Vh ! NE AAAOpi• VILB A' 1-- .0. Won tJ DIN 11 no„It' ma. �.1)-r '�.t.:„(_1 Nw i�. 11� / , to • / ou►_�, _ 714?,... :Iv .• -a 14., Z w 714..0.Lw>'C , • \ M/!Qi',fl if Mk 1 ow v i.` L J ♦ • 1 L > c .. i IN Ho 1f./ On • �. / r ' • F !!/ I SW •SE i 1 1 ��:Aug, ►•= OOJ�NIC[ 1 a. • • W 1111: ! IARAAt f1 5•111MIwpp1` �� r,flUlil / rte.": ' lyl.. /•/ i i•11LOMt1CO t II \\VVVVII�) f-sma'f r at )Phip„ j cunure a / r c O� f r l� (���• �" F4 r K Si II / `Eis i•/ t ' IACLirVtit bpr ..,�•-�� r• ,NE NW r ' —I •1[F /� NW 1 FrtY HILL rnrn n► f.,� irs (�� ( •I I+ b i, n �/ MK. , 1 41,,:i)"� 4 �M�QO t.�A 1.;.( X45. ay > /� sl �' Ylott l I� _ �'�itV..f-�;,,11 ' ��! a 4 r-� �7 :t catsla' s - / — T��► 1 3 •r...\ C," "- `� (D ��- _ t* `.1 -S 1 rl'P,�1" �� STRint to n 'SQL ' o�1 .. Srf� {; ` rpntt4tt.Li , ♦ 1„�c, V t 7 �� E a o .0 ^ . ^• fie' 1 ` L� .I ' eh , F ,E �' , �, Y� dI , .,R `4i: �. � ■tuo LA � � l�l r � • .✓ //s,,, t� E ��-- W 1��cuE� .,� tRGEEM' I114:11 i K lSW n,l / riw t.El• 1:; �/�/,) ACaMi ( 1\'1'' E 147:11; ;'�. •/t// 0.a \ ; f. d" Igo?% Mft A'ac a. /. Dlr� f • 1 /� "►1�SM.�w.'�(mem a�C'vlll _ .Et. .11 at .r '�� 4 - w M*' rItY . j;'/i-Viii, 1. ` 1 t FO • • !QC TIOi1 • • • „:3 47 . • -17 li:fr 6:1 mac .— yç :;- :.., i. —film, , >' •• /O .:. • "• 0` r -..•, •,• -',..�•f • p.•Y vim.• .. . -1 . . - i•tmt &MIS ' 1.4'► pi 1--7-7. •: _• t7 rte: q1.R 1 •'. P•'"rr + R low ; a • L - aw. I. : �- •• / ��%/s.tt• R r-1 cer�lgRtq�, Mot •" Dows4s , s-ea 1 RD .. i . ���•�.. •A, �.IR•1I J ! , pp• . . • , VI' .'.. .. V • ki, ::: ... .- I . f \ ;"-"71 n1,1 am- ' . r- 11. ..f 11. / / SWltw / �• JI�1� 1' 1.•���p. • .., •le pees.1 .6/ .4, .. p ( 1. 4.e/iSe /) ..1,: (....... .. . .,......,:,.......... ' �., •r! "19/R•1 ...x Inn Y RP • !01.1ING ' • ... : )1,../ . .II . ... . '• L.._,I1 •we. ' / /* :. I .. ij,.. ..dI Jd• • • j ,• -• • e r r� .o /� f -�` 1 e1 .r . tt I �� 11I f/ • .N• • I `_:. ,. • . .a.. 1. .I;' ,y::, ) l• orsio 1. 1 .ID. • "•x •.o • t•• I" 4‘ TV ∎ i _ • ... `• ' i * r • !.e «.. Ipe. ( ' ' '• . a ;' ... •r T" • e s ' l � %� is C tr �.i A~ °w • l " -•. �,, 'SI °1 e.. .! 1 t— i et J \ ._ ,••e1 ® •�°'1 •. > �.'. • •I0 j- .1. I .._ : ( Li' M , I L �• ,i � . ,-" ' , r la r.l •it I t r .‘..ii • . (I..% • Gum= p!rA1.1 3 7 1 I X E • S a Iit • . I I I • :§ I .). Z a Iii 1 , ,,, < . ,1:1,1 n. V - 'Id? • a� 1ls a I YI` r= 0 " `� Is ED 93 ia e 0 = . o 0 0 4 LL • _ 3 1 W U e I a D I 1 ft i 1 /� 0 lit 0 16 e 1 a a „......Lts.„0 , Z 1 gif-7.4 i --■ , - _ _ I I It 1 1 ! . .-,.< - - f1 1 T . - e 0 �\ � ` 1 N '4 � , L I 4414, , 1 .31. . . . __, . �, /•.iy•1 1 r -f`1:I'.I',.'%'j 1! 111•'•' 'I1. ' • :.•i / • J.ia lb•I .•'► 1'fr Ft':r a:'r• 'I' VA•,• It •,f1IIi1111 ':III _ 1 1�,�- '. f / ./41�',"tarty-i�.•.:▪ ' •:..47„j/...” •.. • teas /.%;;. i{/Ild (• ':� ? ' t•. :1\ fit. ... 1'•I •"+"1J"lyfr n ' 1 1 1 1 Ir J '/: f hl w'1 4'! ,,,,,,v,,,,;„. ' ,'%!'`111�A • 1 11 •t f/ \Ill brl119i r!�r itq ' . 1 I• rr ♦ I3 •% i IA ,i: 1,,..• .• .4 /o1 .1d IIwJN:ty, * , .1 1 .•.j ' '1 1 '{ I).1-.!' ..— � tl �♦�' A' '. : /.. . 1� 11 ( ,,.•Yi.11,1'•`t11\\\. ♦� •� .r. i r /' I• 7/f / 1,11111 I"I•I fl..l• ,.. •1• ,�1� S' (II ' a�•�+ • ! ' /� /�r(y� 1• i1tI1l11i1111•'1' bM�l1,•.•,..�.. .•. ' • • % `_• .I 1�:� el) •1 . / rr w'4-. /J11111.11'11111111i1`,1,:..• ,,\.- WI ? • 1 1 'rte::'• 'tI// /(„ •' . ?1 ,..i., SI • a . ,1 1 r..i4t' •j'�.,`V �▪�.a=•,. •=.�5 ��\�:`•a� �'f IRIS f�`7-.:,.1.-- - �'.�%ir/f: •�.a{f /'/rf r',./e/........7.4•.-=.- r /•+� ..•��+� M 1 ♦4,T...1-x4 j � y'I• "p � �••' ` - 'j//. 1//' •\,;Ii 1Ji.I/�II(„_•-•••••••••.1.1-4...-11-;i. i+.^ •... l ,.,ems 1 --- , • 1411, I.' , -• 5. jr-•-.;44-♦ •`• • ' :▪. r te.•r:i{+ . 'l•:• m. i r,.•-,'�/ • ...;.:1---..--•• 1:::::w« '" 1_ -. :•• �'�4 \11• 1, ':• •1.•�.•'•� '•\.•o/• • ....wl 111{'Iq�4\`.a:♦�l ...j;ti {r..... w•••,•;-1:-1:_ fJ• •I •.. +q,1, .-.�r .. v4.�•+ S1�yWf '111.11\,t�• -+, .. .. :1� ...��/J� •... / / 1 i•I. II 11 J 1.c' , ' ., :/7•7:74:7•!...: tli •!1.\\�..ti•\1%..Sa •1111 ,4.0,2114. 1: i. .. I % , I t . If • 1 � 's.�.:``•. w..r /Y.•_ 4. i.•/•�w t (r�i1 •%�• yet ill~I'1�.1. �t,-y , r•, u r. .II/. 1 •-i s• • .. I. . .:�''t•I.JIM::/ N.8le•�'i„ 't 7: 'i. 1•� ;( 1 a Ill • 'fl . ,11 r r.l ,t.• ;t11' • i '. • \�tls\I�;N M« r'�% .��.••••••••"""..• '/• . • 1~::• � ...N• 1 a ;_•J /. 1/. ?∎••• i. .• /10 .1/'"1 .1\ • 1 t• �titGtt't'i ,r.►1'11111 .�r.•k%I, �. ��. 1 mar.; h'r • 1''r.Y 1 ''..•.',�.=�_ y�R 1.�•\ . w4Z 1 �'.' r «. 1r Yil 1Y8A� 11 � •�'1!;, ,1 jJt :, ? " =-. .1 1M 1iJ ,�.(ry ••►�r�F /1 •�• �� ./1', !r �• ,i! t'/' 4, �-J•t•,::.� ,t � %..l 1' �'►`�1 .. wit , 1 \ 1 f 1 . t/d,' •11' r 1 I 1/ ♦':41 ` r`.% a F l •1 `• '•'d GG. !t I •%i; ' ' * a.: ,:= .1! Ott�,".y1 e• 1 1 l 7, Q:' _ •1/ ♦f i-! . 1 `` Tq• .�i ';1,1`ai 11 1 1 ,I ( .i 1•rgO • r•.. //.S:+• �•/� s^ }\:o�\« ' 1.♦' ('M IF�1r(-'1,py; �" •I 1 IN, b - L /. r 1 ./ •11 ' /. / f'r1 • 11•a..+�:"t•:•i% . .Iryi:t • .�1 1',Rrell1`1�,.4 ,. %‘...„ , I1 ,I ,. 1...1, t / —V .•'•/�.1' w• :./r ••/''a;,",T, ;,f.r`': _1 ! r�M1:'�...r,-•iri; •• �' / • r 1'i Agenda Information Memo April 18, 1995 Eagan City Council Meeting • J. FINAL SUBDIVISION & FINAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT - OAK CLIFF EIGHTH ADDITION ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: To approve or deny a Final Planned Development and Final Subdivision for the Oak Cliff Eighth Addition to permit the construction of the Penn Cycle shop on the south side of Cliff Road west of Cedar Avenue. FACTS: Final plans,development contracts,planned development agreement,and financial guarantees are in order. ISSUES: None BACKGROUND/ATTACHMENTS: Final plat map - page 1./( . (70 • • . 3 it a I '�; ='r ° ,s 1 117:3 t i 1 1 }is ;1 a2 7 Da• at i t : .`:s1 a: 1 3 " : 131 Is si c� i= 1 2 3 3 '11 3 .'i=: ii i 3 1 11113 f i• a II cv 13 3 a:1 3 a1 �'_!al ' iii 1 1S i c- _ 8a c.g • r1•� -1 I awl = i3 1: I 11 s 11. 1 is 1111 : if 3 i k31 1 s .a- 1 1 • sites it = 3" ._ 1 := 3 i Y O i3 •11 i : ^; ! ;;.1E a a_I ! s r� '1f sr 1 = :1 a LLI • a 1 t t i. t r s Ilai .. : C • 1 " �� £ t r. rr d , a#1 8 1 a I 1 aa » 1a r 3s a s is I • . 113 .: i. ii::1 aS !•i 3 . 1 1 i3 t/: 3 11 1• i I a L j . iv.` �1 C .` 1i = F ca. 2.. LLI r �_ -311: a r �� i3 ,� r1-1 : C I M $ a1 3 _ j i = a ? �- 1 rl 1 iY� d' a 181 1 : 1 1 Iii` s :II 1 e 1 i �� 1 a 1 i -1 1.3 ii ' JiIi 1l5a 13 r l 8 Li !!IH 1 m I 1] - a 8I t 81 s El. _-_ - r -2.13 if 4 eat a '3a rr Ca 1 111 . i 131.13 i I1 1 ail 3 1F 11 . !a ja 1as r v a. ii a I 2=31 I s 7 113 ri1 1 Z _ .3 n t ,1 :g a 1 �{ 11g a t i' es —r. as a= 3= =i:1 $'i r 311 Isi a3 Ea .a:1i Ea . .. e11sr �1I as1 • s Q H . . m I. fi 1 • - _ ,i— �., ' I . : a i'r uui' Z ii tr = le ..7 it m ft LL I o Ii Y 0 L. MI J / tltr; a: 6-, ii i' / ..•Li.. I I r p • / ," / v I _ _1 N 4 L._ ' :� r, :d 1 : .i�� —r aye, c.41t-/,..t. 2.r r , ll!i • �.��a �'Mt:" .:— F p..:< 1= F 1! is n n: 'Olt t I : a a 1 tN ia ' Ia �I' '. L.\ ei. Iii 'i1 a 11; I Iii' 1 � _ 4 :.• .k 5 [ ! Pies r ai 1"1,, T' •• .. I. out,111 y I 1if JIti _1::: t. x :70'. , ,Ia 4, I w - C I i I n "'1. • .' 1 .� I pl. . I H 1 f1 }i a:»:: "� ---rn rur'r .�T-. TrP..T•Li/ , , . Agenda Information Memo April 18, 1995 Eagan City Council Meeting K. FINAL SUBDIVISION - EAGAN OAKS ADDITION ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: To approve or deny a Final Subdivision for the Eagan Oaks Addition located south of Yankee Doodle Road, east of Elrene Road. FACTS: Final plans, development contracts, and financial guarantees are in order. • ISSUES: None ATTACHMENTS: Final plat map - page lb . 14?..* 2 M t I.• o fir' _l I ,�4a ,1 y ii i i I ie Z.. i yjjffl 02:: i i it 1 1 t c .... •0I i4 e I 'a 'sz i11 i • ' '' t t IMP •:I 1 I * 4 J 0 b d.` 9r--,;:r: :4,', I igh:€ I I . . . . • z . 1 - 3;� . I Z. I = t Lew'int'es.Is 1 '�.• = Ora.{ b j -i i 1..., p Apr... {.ltl 1 . 'ii • t`Y" • . 1 t 1 0 •4 00 -.lit ' I a IS. I 1 ii 1 Q 1 L i t I 1 • 1- % i li 01 1 I I I I I I I g I I I r 1 g: t I 'It MAI M.fM , Q li ). I . I I a b A S p :;I r Ill 1 i . / : I•II 1 -.. II...tii.,,:ol''' tv. , - - • I 1 I 1 I $ kip' i / I I I 4 iiiitt • / i Ig I I I I ,.r k ', ' #•e , / ■ +:` _ fit ` 1.I Si �. +�.:4._ I -0 1 ; I I I I _ . i; C I � � 1 151 I ;: 1 1 10 ' 1 14.. � I , I . 43 Agenda Information Memo April 18, 1995 Eagan City Council Meeting L. RESOLUTION. EAGAN ARBOR DAY AND ARBOR MONTH ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: To approve a resolution for Eagan Arbor Day and Eagan Arbor Month. FACTS: A resolution is necessary for Eagan to be recognized as a Tree City by the National Arbor Day Foundation. BACKGROUND/ATTACHMENTS: The City has traditionally passed resolutions recognizing Arbor Day and Arbor Month. The Advisory Parks, Recreation & Natural Resources Commission will be approving a similar resolution at its April 17 meeting. '/ l • Arbor Day and Arbor Month proclamation on page K J CITY OF EAGAN RESOLUTION A PROCLAMATION OF EAGAN ARBOR DAY AND EAGAN ARBOR MONTH • WHEREAS,trees are a most valuable resource in the state of Minnesota and City of Eagan- purifying our air and water, helping conserve our soil, serving as recreational settings, providing habitat for wildlife of all kinds, and enriching our lives in so many important ways;and WHEREAS, pollutants, tree diseases, and urban expansion have damaged and continued to threaten our trees,creating the need for reforestation programs and concerted public action toward ensuring the future of our City's ubran forests;and • WHEREAS,each year the people of Minneosta pay special attention to the wonderful gift that ur trees represent and dedicate themselves to the continued health of our state's trees;and WHEREAS,the City of Eagan has been recognized,for the eighth consecutive year,as a Tree City USA community by the National Arbor Day Foundation and desires to continue its tree-planting programs, NOW,THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED that the Eagan City Council does hereby proclaim Saturday,May 6, 1995 to be ARBOR DAY and the month of May, 1995 to be ARBOR MONTH in the City of Eagan. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Mayor and Council further urge citizens to become more aware of the importance of trees to the well-being of our community; and to participate in City tree planting programs which will ensure a greener place for our citizens to live in the decades to come. CITY OF EAGAN CITY COUNCIL By: Its Chair By: Its City Clerk Motion made by: Seconded by: Those in favor. Those against Dated: t ii7 larbarres.9S • • Agenda Information Memo April 18, 1995 Eagan City Council Meeting M. RECISION OF ISTEA GRANT ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: • To authorize a recision of the ISTEA grant for the Nicols Road trail improvements. BACKGROUND: As a part of its special meeting packet, the City Council will review facts and issues relative to the cost of administration of the ISTEA grant awarded to the City for improvements to the Nicols Road trails system. • • • • Agenda Information Memo April 18, 1995 Eagan City Council Meeting N. EASTER LUTHERAN CHURCH - AUTHORIZE NEW APPLICATION FOR REZONING ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: To authorize Easter Lutheran Church to proceed with a new application for rezoning of the property at the northeast corner of Cliff Road and Pilot Knob Road provided the impervious surface area substantially reduced from the previously considered PIanned Development proposal. FACTS: • The City's Zoning Ordinance does not allow a rezoning proposal to be requested within 12 months of previous Council action unless conditions have changed or the request is substantially different. • Easter Lutheran Church has been discussing potential revisions to the plan with Councilmembers Masin and Hunter. • Easter Lutheran Church would like to make a new application within the 12 month time period. • Council authorization to proceed with the new application would not imply any approval of such application. The rezoning would be a new application and would proceed through the process of Planning Commission and public hearing. ISSUES: None BACKGROUND/ATTACHMENTS: (1) Memo from Community Development Director - page 717 (4 7 • • MEMO —city of eagan TO: MAYOR TOM EGAN & CITY COUNCILMEMBERS FROM: PEGGY A. REICHERT, DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DATE: APRIL 11, 1995 -- SUBJECT: EASTER LUTHERAN CHURCH - AUTHORIZE NEW APPLICATION FOR REZONING • INTRODUCTION Easter Lutheran Church.is considering submitting a new development plan for its church facility at the corner of Pilot Knob and Cliff Road for consideration by the City Council at a future time. Pastor Borgschatz and members of his congregation have had discussions with Councilmembers Masin and Hunter regarding revisions which they may be able to support. DISCUSSION The City Zoning Ordinance, Section 11.10, Subd. 19d, states the following: "Request for Variance, Conditional Use Permit, or Rezoning. A request for a Variance, Conditional Use Permit, or Rezoning which has been acted upon may not be requested again until a period of twelve (12) months has passed unless the applicant can show to the satisfaction of the Council that the conditions that were present when the earlier request was filed have changed or that the request is substantially different." The code is not clear at which point the Council must agree to consideration of a new proposal for a rezoning. Before Easter Lutheran Church spends any more time or effort in developing a new proposal, it would be helpful if the Council would indicate that it would at least be willing to consider such a new application within the twelve month - • period. . Council authorization to proceed with a new application would not imply any approval of • such application, but would simply authorize its consideration. Easter Lutheran would submit a revised Preliminary Planned Development proposal for public hearing and consideration by the Planning Commission and ultimately, by the City Council. It is my understanding that Councilmember Hunter has indicated to the church that he is still supporting a 25%maximum impervious surface coverage. Councilmember Masin has indicated that she would be open to a revised plan in the range of 30-35% impervious surface provided that the storm water management and water quality related issues can be handled. The plan previously considered by the City Council proposed a lot coverage of 58% impervious surface. Pastor Borgschatz has indicated that he would be-talking to his congregation about a revised plan in which the property is still used for church purposes, but a 35% maximum impervious surface criterion would govern the revised development plans. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED To authorize Easter Lutheran Church to proceed with a new application for rezoning of the property at the northeast corner of Cliff Road and Pilot Knob Road provided the impervious surface area is substantially reduced from the previously considered Planned Development proposal. OrDire r of Community Development PARfjs • ((7 Agenda Information Memo April 18, 1995 Eagan City Council Meeting O. APPROVE EXEMPTION FROM LAWFUL GAMBLING LICENSE, VALLEY VIEWERS 4-H CLUB ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: To approve a resolution for the Valley Viewers 4-H Club for an exemption from the lawful gambling license requirement. BACKGROUND/ATTACHMENTS: The 4-H Club historically operates a bingo game in conjunction with the Eagan 4th of July celebration. As a community service, non-profit association, they are requesting an exemption from the license requirements for this temporary activity. • Resolution for exemption from lawful gambling license on page 34.7 • • • RESOLUTION CITY OF EAGAN APPLICATION FOR EXEMPTION FROM LAWFUL GAMBLING LICENSE • WHEREAS, the Valley Viewers 4-H Club has applied for an exemption from Lawful Gambling License; and WHEREAS, the Eagan Police Department has reviewed the application and has not identified any reason to deny; and WHEREAS, the Valley Viewers 4-H Club has operated bingo games in conjunction with the Fourth of July celebration since 1988; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City of Eagan, Dakota County,Minnesota, hereby approves the Exemption from Lawful Gambling License for Valley Viewers 4-H Club. CITY OF EAGAN CITY COUNCIL By: Its Mayor Attest: • Its Clerk Motion made by: Seconded by: Those in favor: Those against: CERTIFICATION I,E. J. VanOverbeke, Clerk of the City of Eagan,Dakota County, Minnesota, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted by the City Council of the City of Eagan, Dakota County,Minnesota, in a regular meeting thereof assembled this 18th day of April, 1995. E. J. VanOverbeke, City Clerk City of Eagan c7 • Agenda Information Memo - April 18, 1995 P. RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING MUNICIPAL STATE AID STREETS ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: To approve/deny the resolution establishing Municipal State Aid Street designation on Lexington Avenue(MSA#111)from Lone Oak Road to TH 55 and Thomas Lake Road(MSA#128)from Cliff Road to Diffley Road and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute the appropriate resolution. FACTS: • The City has 1.90 miles available to designate as Municipal State Aid Streets within the community. • MSA 111 (Lexington Avenue)is 0.73 miles in length. • MSA 128, Thomas Lake Road is 1.11 miles in length. • Total mileage requested for Municipal State Aid Street designation is 1.84 miles. Lexington Avenue is designated as a Minor Arterial and Thomas Lake Road is designated as a Neighborhood Collector in the Transportation Plan element of the City's Comprehensive Guide Plan. ISSUES: • None anticipated ATTACHMENTS: • Sample Resolution P • Site plan showing the location of designations. . f • • CITY OF EAGAN RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING MUNICIPAL STATE AID STREETS WHEREAS,the City Engineer and City Staff have recommended to the City Council of the City of Eagan, Dakota County, Minnesota, that the streets hereinafter described should be designated as Municipal State Aid Streets under the provisions of Minnesota Laws; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Eagan, Dakota County, Minnesota, that the streets described as follows, to-wit: MSA No. Street From To 111 Lexington Avenue Lone Oak Road (CSAH 26) Trunk Highway 55 128 Thomas Lake Road Cliff Road (CSAH 32) Diffley Road (CSAH 30) be, and hereby are, established, located and designated as Municipal State Aid streets of said City, subject to the approval of the Commissioner of Transportation of the State of Minnesota. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to forward two certified copies of this resolution to the Commissioner.of Transportation for his consideration, and that upon his approval of the designation of said road, the same be constructed, improved and maintained as Municipal State Aid Streets of the City of Eagan to be numbered and known as Municipal State Aid Streets as indicated above. ADOPTED this 18th day of April , 1995. Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk CERTIFICATE City Clerk of the City of Eagan, hereby certify that the foregoing resolution is a true and correct copy of a resolution adopted by the Eagan City Council on April 18 1995 . S�3 ---- _ . , . . • . . . • . - MENDOTA HEIGHTS .. . . sm WM - Vif § • - . • • ..0 0 Cgs I, ..... •• 560C -cm\ —,.--',.. . rk . • --- g:1) ------; " ..--c\---••‘cra,"— yr— .46000 g®I • \ ' et•9C - 'TRAPP AYE. AN444.41•1.;-i.S° ' . A a ces eLk Toot:am TAEAN OCUSTRILL,RD.. ..) . x •R II al ; Zinisr# C'et • •CT% /141 %00 .* 0011,.. c,41. s ••• 1 42. ,S9 ep kENNETR:ST, . • • ..., 4. N. a • kr , • 44 8 . ; , LEXINGTON AVE • . riA • 0. ' DR. 11, - •10, c,v 4.; . 11, (> 40- 0' . P . Wrt6- . iriki*111114 . it qt . •• . 3." a J1 A ® • esoo . . Rum A il . At• Ca " g . • c. _ 109687 1 it • • ;171- k-43. . - . 0 _..• ,.. k,....1 'aeoL.Lo *op. a vlEv PO , al - -.<15,,0 -.0.1 •-•0 ; .1 4 . --e------ : ar- 4,gi tk,v.Ili A m-47 /.. • / 'IA. . • 4 •„ , • .1.M. PORT COL •. . !r. S 9 1I-A• )g17\_Suk e. in 46, . .• 0,11‘i; ,,, I 2- ---....,„ h. it. AppJa.-. y --I. VIES 4> 'i r-CO.U1 AVE.. ... •-'r CV. , 41111111?11.2 AVE.4,01/12-_}. ..•rn Lt.9.- 'IL 4.44'-'' Gaol,. 'tioddra. • -. N c2, . .• . :1 .,.., . .. .. 1:43°. • li 0 . • ti q41•44°NE OR. RC SZTas416. - .• " .- , • ti 4-R. IT WOMAN CT. 4LLooesTeRE OR.. .. !"A% IN I.E.00lk■I"L ' 42.coAritv Gral NAV CEATIIM°I)RAnk s.•cula are47o+ gl •9 • .....1.LOOESYNEcoi.CIR. ••• 1 ERR4 ;"6 V-4 • 111411.7.9°SolE*1151 at.••.'I ;41.11:. i , •: 43.4 4.CPO=RYE. • • CUL I 8 1 • i . ' .., •. ie.°, :iiiii : ...,• 1 r_ En , RASP • 4,..,,...0„..,CIR. - a ,scam +Cr _, -I 4 La. ,„. „ ** . e: 9900 • • tr;8 . * •• ft. _ _ - _ moi ino07 . .. ,: . T• e,i. .,„ . ....: • LE t R. _AS., ,3 a- 4 V 50 e 1 Lake ... S Locs"E CO IML La 1:,1-15-al.SmAl. c. 1.1.116 /' • • 0 4 •1 I 4•T 4444,,,, 0. w 55 4t, ••• LA.A• • lia '." te • .11 • a •• CY. . • " pOS4.a 14.*. AIR..aWraosea.'1 • 8 AY 411'. 'IS •I. CEA:: 40'' "-s.4,, - ' '. t Acur. . -Q.....4. . ..at. clihrsc.4 Lb. THOMAS LAKE ROAD 01 . .40 • . . • ' i ... .. 1. on. : I4 t•: . Ti.„,„,• 0 R;_,.B.L.d1.A E-N i . ea0 , ft ea- • L3.144 ' • ERNE 1. se, * -• 411 . . .. 4 et 1 cliP• _ il: 4t" cv. L •ILOEftot • LI . . , : L Mkt Aik,', 0 k ti, • in fi 41 • # C‘P. :›.-----•s a•.- • ci., ■- eurr• Ah t RD. I i WO • ic 87.. Ib . 'Lt."- - .,..--v0 LANCASTER L.A. 12600 4 b..'‘. 4 ' Evi NA. 44*. Jur 47:4 '7'211147. rilL *°1..44 4 rerv.,,5 16., 5-: J .ge. ,.,‘:: • 1 Cr. 14,11..,....., on.. . . — 44 ( -- .- .0:: :1'/6 - if • •• j ....Loa s q.,'"•01:I ....• ..../ • i' .. . Agenda Information Memo April 18, 1995 Eagan City Council Meeting R. APPROVE SOLICITATION LICENSE, BLUE BELL ICE CREAM ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: To approve a solicitation license for Blue Bell Ice Cream for 1995. FACTS: Mustafa Qasim Mfaddi has applied for a license to sell Blue Bell ice cream on neighborhood streets. The application has been reviewed by staff and is in order for consideration by the Council at this time. ISSUES: If the application is approved, it should be subject to the following conditions: 1. Continuation of liability insurance evidenced by an insurance certificate. 2. Hours of operation will be from 12:00 noon to 15 minutes prior to sunset. 3. The license period is from April 19, 1995 to October 15, 1995. 4. Trucks will not generate a noise level greater than 65 decibels. 5. Caution swing arms will be required on each vehicle operating within the City. 6. Trucks are prohibited from operation and sales in City parks. ATTACHMENTS: A copy of the application is enclosed without page number for your review. Agenda Information Memo April 18, 1995 Eagan City Council Meeting S. EASTER LUTHERAN CHURCH - FINAL PLAT EXTENSION ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: • To approve a 45-day extension for the recording of Final Plat for Easter Addition. FACTS: • Easter Lutheran Church has had title opinion problems that require additional time to file their Final Plat. ISSUES: None • BACKGROUND/ATTACHMENTS: (1) Letter from Larry Franke - page 5 7 \40.1 Easter Lutheran Church James P. Borgschatz, Pastor 4 Thomas H.Johnson, Pastor Eagan N 512 April 6, 1995 Shannon Tyree Project Planner City of Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan,MN 55122 Re: Easter Addition Final Plat Dear Shannon, • As you are aware,Easter Lutheran Church requested a 60 day extension to the recording of the final plat for Easter Addition approximately 2 months ago and this request was granted by the City Council. Unfortunately,we have just received the title opinion pertaining to the Erdos property and I don't think the county surveyor can turn around the plat and the appropriate signatures be obtained to • meet this first extension. I am therefore requesting an additional 45 day extension for the recording of the final plat for Easter Addition. If you have any questions regarding this issue or need additional information,please feel free to contact me at 835-4981. • Very truly yours, • Larry Frank t.ECEI LIVE ; .1 icy i 5-7 • •••••••..••• Agenda Information Memo April 18, 1995 Eagan City Council Meeting T. DECLARE SURPLUS PROPERTY. AUTHORIZE DISPOSAL OF BUILDING FIXTURES ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: To declare certain municipal center building fixtures to be surplus property and authorize their disposal. FACTS: The City will salvage and reuse as many of the fixtures in the existing municipal center as possible prior to demolition and remodeling. Despite this, a variety of fixtures will not have immediate reuse within the community. Due to the timeframes and liability issues associated with disposing of fixtures to the public through a sale, staff is proposing to dispose of surplus items°through a direct sale to a salvage company or through donation to a non-profit reuse facility. This will permit the City to maximize the reuse of salvage items and avoid incurring the costs associated with demolition and disposal. BACKGROUND/ATTACHMENTS: A list of salvage items identified as surplus will be distributed with Additional Information on Monday. • s Agenda Information Memo April 18, 1995 A. PROJECT 681,N.NICOLS RD STREET RECONSTRUCTION ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: • Close the public hearing and approve/deny Project No. 681 as presented in the feasibility report/as amended and authorize the preparation of detailed plans and specifications. FACTS: • The Council received the petition and authorized the preparation of the feasibility report on December 20, 1994. • The City Council received the feasibility report on March 21, 1995, and scheduled a public hearing for April 18, 1995. • All notices for the public hearing were published in the legal newspaper as well as written notification sent to all property owners affected. • An informational meeting was held on April 6, 1995. (Please refer to attached minutes.) • Mr. Lester Spencer, 3786 Nicols Road,Parcel#010-55. - Mr. Spencer was assessed for Silver Bell Road along the entire frontage of Silver Bell. - Based on Silver Bell Road frontage assessment,credit parcel for 1 lot equivalent of street assessment. - Mr. Spencer has stated that his half of Nicols Road is in good condition and does not need to be repaired. Therefore,he feels no street assessment is justified to his parcel. • Sheldon Ramnarine, 3785 Nicols Road,Parcel#020-05. - Second proposed lot equivalent not justified due to jurisdictional wetland. - Revised pending assessment roll to indicate one residential equivalent for street construction and no assessments for sanitary sewer or water service. ISSUES: • The scope of the proposed Nicols Road improvements, including trailways, is contingent upon the Council action on Consent Agenda Item M. (Recision of ISTEA Grant). • The property owner at 3785 Nicols Road appears to agree with the merits of the proposed improvement. • The property owner at 3786 Nicols Road does not feel a street assessment is justified to his parcel. • The installation of the watermain along Nicols Road to service the MCWS metering station in 1989 patched the street adjacent to Mr. Spencer's property therefore giving Mr. Spencer the perception that his half of the street is in good condition. • Mr. Spencer has also identified some storm sewer drainage issues which can be resolved with the final plan and specification's preparation. ATTACHMENTS: • A summary of the public inf�,.�+�ational meeting. g.,..---6)1(°C) 3 • Feasibility Report e APR- 12-9M WED 1 : .4ø MSA S T PAUL P . 01 Post-�It'Fax Note 7671 I°at*- rt90o► To 7'/L(Kl� C?�2a j From L(1-42/ Co./DePI. no/61447 ' -C,¢ FetxI / �f/— 70l�d FaKP .. MEMORANDUM (f 9 • TO: CITY OF EAGAN CITY PUBLIC WORKS STAFF CITY COUNCIL. FROM: STEVE GATLIN; MSA, CONSULTING ENGINEERS 0E4_ RB: CITY PROJECT 681-NICOLS ROAD PUBLIC INFORMATIQjJAL MEETING SUMMARY DATE: APRIL 12, 1995 A neighborhood meeting was held Thursday,April 6, 1995, at 6:30 p.m. to discuss the Nicols Road improvement project, City project number 681. In attendance were the following: Property Owners: Fern Pederson-2523 Portland Avenue, Minneapolis, MN Sheldon Ramnarine-3785 Nicols Road,Eagan, MN Lester Spencer-3786 Nicols Road,Eagan, MN Eagan City Staff: Tom Colbert, Public Works Director Mike Foertsch, Assistant City Engineer MSA, Consulting Engineers: Steve Gatlin,Project Manager A brief presentation was made by Steve Gatlin from MSA, regarding the project. Following the presentation a number of questions and issues were discussed. The following is a summary of each of the issues along with recommended solutions or follow-up actions: 1. Mr. Lester Spencer, 3786 Nicols Road: Mr. Spencer had a number of questions arid concerns, including the following: a. Corner Lot Credit for Prior Work on Silver Bell Road Mr. Spencer suggested that he had previously been assessed for Silver Bell Road, and should not be assessed for 2 residential lot equivalents for improvements to Nicols Road. Solution: Discussion based on City staff review of past assessment records indicates that the point Mr.Spencer.makes is correct. He has previously been assessed on a front foot basis for improvement on Silver Bell Road. Accordingly the assessment for Nicols Road should involve 1 residential lot equivalent,rather than 2. The final assessment roll will include this correction. (0 APR- 1 2-93 WED 16 : 41 MSA ST PAUI, P . 02 MEMORANDUM APRIL 12, 1995 PAGE TWO b. Drainage Into New Storm Sewer System Mr. Spencer expressed an interest in providing drainage from his driveway and yard area into the new storm sewer system. Presently, at the edge of the pavement, near the end of his driveway,a drop-off exists and makes access difficult because of the "bump". Drainage is handled by an existing ditch and storm sewer culvert system. He wishes to have the"bump"eliminated,and have drainage directly into a new storm sewer catch basin. Solution: We have tried to contact Mr. Spencer by phone, but have not been able to reach him, as of the date of this memo. We will meet with Mr. Spencer in the field, prior to construction,to discuss possible solutions. It will be possible to regrade his driveway and boulevard as part of the project to drain directly into a new catch basin structure to be built on the parallel storm sewer system. By regrading the new shoulder we can eliminate the 'bump" that Mr. Spencer now experiences at the end of his driveway. C. Buildable 2nd Lot Mr. Spencer indicates that even though he has two structures on his property, it is a single parcel. Solution: While, it is acknowledged that Mr. Spencer has a single parcel of record based upon present zoning and building configuration, it is possible to split the parcel into two residential sites. Accordingly,his second residential lot equivalent was considered for assessment of the Nicols Road improvement. However, based on past assessments for Silver Bell Road, only 1 lot equivalent is proposed to be assigned to his parcel. 2. Sheldon Ramnarine, 3785 Nicola Road: Mr. Ramnarine has a number of issues and concerns that are summarized as follows: a. Developability of 2nd Lot at 3785 Nicola Road The feasibility report and proposed assessment roll for the Nicols Road improvement assigned 2 residential lot equivalents to the parcel at 3785 Nichols Road, owned by Mr.Ramnarine. The northerly parcel is currently vacant,but has been filled, and is mowed and maintained as part of the yard. He feels the parcel is not developable and should not be assessed. • APR- 12-9 , WED 16 : 4?. . MSA ST PAUL P . OS • • • MEMORANDUM APRIL 12, 1995 PAGE TIME • Solution: MSA staff has reviewed the parcel in the field, and based on our investigation, feel it is not a potential buidable site. The parcel has soils and vegetation indicative of wetlands. The parcel appears to be part of a jurisdictional wetland, and could not be developed without permits and significant mitigation. On this basis, it is not appropriate to recommend a 2nd residential lot equivalent for this parcel. The parcel should only be assessed for one lot equivalent. b. Water Service for 2nd Site at 3785 Nicols Road Our preliminary review of assessment records indicated that this parcel was not previously assessed for water. Mr. Ramnarine raised a concern that he had been assessed for water and was paying water use charges for his present residence, and asked to have this matter reviewed. Solution: Upon review of assessment records, it was clear that Mr. Ramnarine had been assessed, and is being billed for water at the residence of 3785 Nicols Road. Accordingly, the proposed assessment roll will be modified to eliminate the recommendation for utility services for the parcel at 3785 Nicols. Upon further review, it was found that the Spencer parcel at 3786 had not been charged for any water assessments,nor was being billed for water utilization. The final assessment roll should indicate two water service extensions to serve the Spencer parcel at 3786 Nicols Road. c. Ditch Drainage Along West Side of Nicols Road Mr. Ramnarine indicated concerns regarding the condition of the existing ditch and culvert system. Solution: • As part of the Nicols Road project, the ditch will be regraded and culverts replaced if necessary to improve ditch drainage. 3. General Issues: Several other general concerns were raised by property owners including: a. Street light at intersection of Silver Bell Road and Nicols Road 2, AI R.r 12,—.9's .WW$ 16 :43 PISA ST ,PAUL P - 04 MEMORANDUM APRIL 12, 1995 PAGE FOUR • The issue of needs for street lights in the area was discussed. Specific concern was expressed for lighting the intersection of Nichols Road and Silver Ball Road. Solution: As part of the project, a street light will be considered for installation at the intersection of Nicols Road and Silver Bell Road. Assuming the light meets the City policy, the intersection light will be installed as part of the City's major street lighting program. b. Stop Signs-Intersection of Nicols.Road and Silver Bell Road Presently,.a stop sign exists at the intersection of Nicols Road and Silver Bell Road, stopping traffic on Silver Bell Road at Nicols Road. A request was made for consideration of a three way stop to further control the intersection. Solution: City staff indicated that a study will be conducted at the intersection, to determine whether or not additional stop signs are warranted. If stop signs are warranted, they will be installed upon completion of the Nicols Road improvements. Summary It appears that all of the issues raised at the neighborhood meeting have been reviewed, either in the field or as part of amendments to the feasibility report. All items noted will be incorporated into the final construction plans, if the project is ordered by the City Council, at the public hearing on April 18, 1995. Changes in the amount of final project assessments to reflect residents concerns will be incorporated into the revised feasibility report. SDG:pd ntioo:-11o9.spr • • 73 / • • FEASIBILITY STUDY FOR NICOLS ROAD STREET AND STORM DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS CITY OF EAGAN PROJECT NUMBER 681 MARCH 1995 I hereby certify that this Feasibility Study was written by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly registered Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. 'G. i‘ir 3- ) G 9.5- Gregory/. ' ouse, P.E. Date Reg. No. 2 •e • wed by: Steven D. atlin, P.E. Reg. No. 12754 • MSA, Consulting Engineers 1326 Energy Park Drive St. Paul, MN 55108 Phone: 644-4389 Fax: 644-9446 FMS-112.031 (..0 112-031-10 i I • • L March 20, 1995 File: 112-031-10 CONSULTING EMU 1326 Energy Park Drive Honorable Mayor and City Council St.Paul,MN 55108 City of Eagan 612-644.4389 3830 Pilot Knob Road 1-800.888.2923 Eagan, Minnesota 55122 Fax:612.644.9446 RE: FEASIBILITY STUDY NICOLS ROAD RECONSTRUCTION Dear Mayor and City Council: Please find attached the feasibility study for the referenced project. This report addresses street reconstruction and storm drainage improvements on approximately 1,200 linear feet of Nicols Road. The report addresses approximately 360 feet of Nicols Road street reconstruction immediately north of Silver Bell Road. The remaining 840 feet of roadway will be constructed under the existing MCWS Bloomington Siphon contract. This segment CIVIL ENGINEERING will be improved with the reconstruction of the existing rural road section with design ENVIRONMENTAL consideration taken for future curb and a bituminous trailway. Also included within this MUNICIPAL report are a preliminary cost estimate, an anticipated project schedule, and a preliminary PLANNING assessment roll for the project. SOLID WASTE STRUCTURAL It is our recommendation that the project, as proposed in this study, is feasible. Please SURVEYING contact our office if you have questions or require further information regarding this TRAFFIC ' TRANSPORTATION project. • ELECTRICAL/MECHANICAL Sincerely, ENGINEERING: HVAC MSA, CONSUL !. G ENGINEERS POWER DISTRIBUTION / SCADA � Z7. SYSTEM CONTROLS Ste•en D. Gatlin, P.E. Project Manager Attachmen . , • . S °21•AS• Re ' '-• . City of Eagan Finance Department Date OFFICES IN: l r4a V09 _ Jed 3 Z r �7 •MINNEAPOLIS Re ew- •y ity of ' blic orks Department D to PRIOR LAKE ST.PAUL WASECA FEAS-112.031 f J 112-031-10 CITY OF EAGAN NICOLS ROAD STREET RECONSTRUCTION AND DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS CITY PROJECT NUMBER 681 TART F nF CONTENTS Item . - Page INTRODUCTION 1 SCOPE 1 EXISTING CONDITIONS 2 Pavement 2 Utilities 3 PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS 3 Street Improvements 3 Storm Drainage Improvements 5 Utility Improvements 6 PROJECT COSTS . . 6 Project Financing 7 Assessment Calculation 7 City Costs 9 EASEMENTS AND PERMITS 10 PROJECT SCHEDULE 10 CONCLUSION . . .. . . . . . . . . . 11 • . PEAS-112.031 112-031-10 INTRODUCTION • - W This feasibility study is submitted as required under Minnesota State Statute 429 regarding the assessment of public-improvements. The City of Eagan authorized the feasibility study on January 6, 1995 for the reconstruction of approximately 360 linear feet of Nicols Road and an evaluation of approximately 1,200 linear feet of storm sewer adjacent to the roadway. The project was initiated as a result of the ongoing construction of the Bloomington Siphon sewer interceptor project. That project required the reconstruction of Nicols road from the Eagan city limits to the - existing Metropolitan Council Wastewater Services (MCWS) metering station, south of the railroad crossing. The location of the proposed improvement is between Silver Bell Road and the existing railroad tracks as presented on Exhibit 1. The zoning of the area is primarily Light Industrial with the parcel at 3786 Nicols Road zoned residential, R-1. The current land use consists of two residential properties, the MCWS metering station and vacant land. This study investigates the feasibility of coordinating these street improvements in conjunction with the MCWS's Bloomington Siphon project currently underway. The proposed street improvements consist of the reconstruction of a rural design section, nine-ton roadway. In accordance with the Transportation Plan Element of the City of Eagan's Comprehensive Guide Plan, Nicols Road is designated a community collector roadway. SCOPE The purpose of this report is to analyze the feasibility of reconstructing Nicols Road as presented . on,Exhibit 2. .It is proposed to reconstruct the existing rural roadway to a 24-foot wide bituminous .., roadway with design,consideration taken into account for future construction to urban standards yith,B618 concrete;curb and gutter. Also included in the scope of this-project is the installation .k ,r of the bituminous wear,course for the remaining 840 linear feet of Nicols Road from-the metering station to the railroad crossing. According to the City's Comprehensive Trail Plan and a previously awarded Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act(ISTEA) grant, an eight-foot wide,.multi-use, bituminous trailway will be constructed along the east side of this roadway within the next two construction seasons. At that time, the bituminous,wear course will be installed over the 840 foot section from the metering station to the railroad crossing. The design of Nicols road will also consider this future construction. FEAS-112.031 - 1 - (c7'l 112-031-10 In addition, the improvements include the upgrade of existing storm sewer, the replacement of • driveway culverts, and the grading of ditches as required by the reconstruction of the roadway. Project funding will also be addressed within this report. The costs outlined in Appendix A of • this report include an estimated construction cost based upon anticipated 1995 construction costs. Also included is a 5% construction contingency and a 30% indirect overhead cost which includes • anticipated design and construction engineering, city administration, legal and fiscal expenses. A preliminary assessment roll is also included as Appendix B to this report. That assessment roll was prepared in accordance with the City of Eagan's current assessment policy as this project will be funded through a combination of property assessments and City funds. • EXISTING CONDITIONS Pavement The current roadway consists of a 24-foot wide rural roadway with a 40 mile per hour design speed. The segment of roadway evaluated for the putpose of this report is approximately 1 200 feet in length and extends from the intersection of Silver Bell Road to the existing railroad crossing north of the MCWS metering station. The portion of Nicols Road from the metering station to the north is to be reconstructed as part of the MCWS Bloomington Siphon project, while the remaining 360 feet of roadway (from the metering station to Silver Bell Road) will require reconstruction under the proposed City of Eagan contract. n. The, ity:'s Pavement Condition Report was reviewed as part of the preparation of this feasibility r,„s„.tU YT=. :That:report is used to assist staff in prioritizing steeet.improvements and helping to lnanigefhe,overall transportation system. Based upon the conditions.of•Nicols Road from Silver - Bell Road to the metering station, the average subgrade R-value is estimated at approximately R- 15 with two R values as low as R-9 and R-11. A value of R-10 was used in the pavement design for this segment of roadway. FEAS-112.031 -2 - Les ) 112-031-10 • • • \ 0 1000 ,.°°;, _ RP` PROJECT LOCATION "c2 4/A. ci . G�\�'P �,v�� L!2J vL Zr�p • , �F,�1 . 2 r.,%...6.5.\ T..> �iP HAZE �� 'pd J �,d RD '� ,� SILVER T27N 77 a 13 J¢H in R24W -23W ilitk fig..• 4*/ ,51/ 24 p / / / G�� P e-\ � DR ‘;'• CC' 40'" \P F � " S'�EW DR. 4 9 . � C- J SIBLEY - C9R , N MF,, •� co • • ••aP A ./4�F A" 4, I• /vr tA.0y �._ CCTHELSEA - .�_ V i- CA. IPLER r) IO �‘, a. F MF Cq in A 4 C GA � A JADE ADE EA031 EX1 • - ''A i • / 1/1St NICOLS ROAD l ° 0T CITY OF EAGAN PROD. N . LOCATION MAP 6 city ct C1 n COMSU6t(MG BMG RS y of c 2 t _... . .,- s'I- - , — ., (... P••.......% ' ...7.---\--....., ( V, t . . .Y.-- . l . 015 (.. ... '--7 N . .. ....: , , 41>. .■N.\ 0.\ INNsil% /.5,`52 \. ,k_s<'• CP CP . 020-55 . - 't... .200 I :.--.... , --..-- .11 ,...:.. ' \•..............,....../' ( • • Ak. s- •• c ,..../ '... •30-5 ..... C)))1 ...- ..----- --• 6\ . .., , - 011-59 ,...: \ ..- , ..4 1 r• .../ .•••. • . • . . . .. 1.0. ..".'• ... 0 .• , . (..tp ..*. I 021-,57 - • . • . - . . 1307 01.2,-5.9. MCWS METERING STATION - , .... 6 • . • ' .. _. i'ia, • • • ■ 010-55 „Aggeil •11 ,.:,.:, -. .:. • vb. .„ j —: , :v. ,.. ovm, . ._,.., ....... \?Art II,( t - i___F -- • . wt. . ,... . -, OZ(20 . \1,71;;* --• %. '2 1 • ,..-. - = •eTo- • . .. BY MCWS - . - .._ . . •... . SIVER BELL ROAD W6 ) BY CITY OF EAGAN ..........„..._______-----\\ . i EA031EX2 1 , DDT • liSt . crn, NICOLS ROADNo. 681 VI ONSTRUCT1 2 . CONSEEC OCOEE 711.•4 :—C11 city oF cagan i. . I • • Utilities Storm drainage along the existing roadway consists primarily of ditches with corrugated metal pipe (CMP)culverts installed beneath driveway entrances. There is an existing storm sewer adjacent to Nicols Road, approximately 25 feet east of centerline. The pipe consists of both reinforced concrete pipe (RCP) and CMP and ranges in size from 36 to 42 inches in diameter. The catch basins installed at the west end of Silver Bell road and several beehive catch basins along this r .. length of roadway contribute flow to the storm sewer, which discharges into the Minnesota River Valley,just north of the railroad crossing as shown on Exhibit 4. Based upon preliminary storm drainage calculations and historical information provided by the City's Public Works Department, the storm sewer between Silver Bell Road and the outfall is inadequately sized to carry the flows the pipe currently experiences, notwithstanding the potential future flows the pipe may receive from future development of the area. There are also existing utilities within Nicols Road. An existing 12-inch trunk watermain extends to the intersection of Silver Bell Road and Nicols Road and an eight-inch main was extended to the north to the MCWS metering station in 1991. The residents adjacent to Nicols Road are currently served with municipal water. There is also an existing 15-inch sanitary sewer within the Nicols Road right-of-way. This sewer " serves the residence at 3785 Nicols Road; however, it does not currently serve the property at 3786 Nicols Road. It is anticipated that sewer and water services will also be required to accommodate possible lot splits for both of these properties. The sanitary sewer currently discharges into the MWCC metering station referenced above. PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS Street Improvements • The two elements that are paramount in the design of any street project are the projected traffic volumes and the underlying soil conditions. In the case of Nicols Road, the traffic volumes projected for 2012 are estimated at approximately 1,720 vehicles per day based upon 1992 traffic counts of 1,154 and the typical Minnesota Department of Transportation 20-year projection factor of 1.49.1-1 PEAS-112.031 - 3 - \ 112.331-1O • • American Engineering Testing(AET)was subcontracted to perform a soils investigation of Nicols Road to determine the suitability of the underlying soils. Based upon an estimated soil factor of 100% and the assumed R-value of R-10, combined with the projected traffic volumes presented above; it is anticipated that a one-foot sand subcut should be installed to increase the subgrade soil factor to 75%..Minnesota Department of Transportation design - .standards require a granular equivalency of approximately 25 inches for these soils. The resultant proposed pavement design cross-section is presented in Exhibit 3. The remaining pavement section • consists of four inches of bituminous pavement, placed in two separate,two-inch lifts, and ten inches of class five aggregate base material.- The proposed street design for this segment of roadway will consist of a 24-foot wide, rural road section. Additionally, the roadway will be designed to accommodate the future installation of concrete curb and gutter and an off road, 8-foot wide, multi-use, bituminous trailway to be constructed behind the curb on the east side of Nicols Road. The remaining 840 foot segment of Nicols Road will be constructed as part of the MCWS Bloomington Siphon project. The wearing course will be installed when the concrete curb and gutter and trailway are constructed over the northern 840 feet of roadway. Costs for the wear course are included in the estimates for project costs. The roadway will continue to meet the geometric requirements for a 40 mile per hour design speed. The future trailway will be constructed to meet the City of Eagan design standards of two inches of bituminous pavement placed upon six-inches of class five aggregate base. The trailway will be constructed to serve the future expansion of the City's Comprehensive Trail, System, which is planned to extend north along Nicols Road and connecting to the Minnesota River Valley Trail system. This segment of trailway is part of an approved ISTEA grant for the Minnesota River • Valley Trail access project. Construction of this project will likely take place in 1996 and the City . should delay construction of the trailway until the ISTEA trail construction project proceeds. This is desirable as 80% of the trailway cost would be paid by ISTEA funds at the time of construction. As outlined in the City's plan for The trailway, it is anticipated that the trail will be 8 feet in width; however, AASHTO design standards may dictate modifications in the trail width to meet ISTEA's federal funding requirements. FEAS-112.031 - 4 - 1 a 112-031-10 The estimated costs of the proposed street improvements are presented in the cost tabulation section of this report and in Appendix A. The trailway improvements and the installation of concrete curb and gutter will be financed through the ISTEA funded project; therefore, those costs are not included in this report. Storm Drainage Improvements • .Storm drainage improvements are based upon.two possible separate storm sewer alternatives. On the west side of Nicols Road, the regrading and restoration of ditches and the removal and upgrading of new CMP culverts in existing driveways is proposed. In addition, the upgrading of the existing storm drainage piping on the east side of Nicols Road from Silver Bell Road to the north is proposed as presented in Exhibits 5A and 5B. The current storm drainage system routes storm drainage from the area along the southwest side of Trunk Highway 13 to the north. The storm sewer currently carries design flows of approximately 140 cubic feet per second, causing the surcharging of manholes at the downstream end of the system due to inadequate pipe capacity. It is proposed, as presented in Exhibit 5A, to replace the existing storm sewer piping north of Silver Bell Road with a 48 and 54-inch diameter sewer system to alleviate existing problems and allow for future capacities that may occur as additional tributary area develops. As an alternative if the existing piping is currently in good condition, the City may wish to consider the installation • of a second, parallel pipe installed at a shallower depth to act as an overflow, providing additional capacity under high flow situations. This alternative is presented as Exhibit 5B. Due to poor subgrade soil conditions, the installation of storm sewer in this area will require special considerations for pipe bedding and the structural stability of the utility trench above the pipe.. These two alternatives for the storm sewer replacement have been considered. Alternatives • such as the installation of a parallel pipe, the partial diversion of flow into the ditch west of Nicols •. . - Road, and/or the use of polyethylene or corrugated metal pipe will be further evaluated in the• design phase of this project. In addition to these storm drainage improvements, the outlet of the system requires the installation of rip rap and erosion control improvements to eliminate the ongoing wash out problems and stabilize the outlet area. FEAS-112.031 -5 - -1 3 • 112-031-10 • • • • • R/W 33' 33' OW —ON 3' 12' 12' R/W No -MI 4.00 =2.00% 2.00% • PROPOSED FUTURE CURB AND GUTTER AND BITUMINOUS TRAIL 2" 2331 TYPE 41A BIT. WEAR COURSE -12" 2331 TYPE 318 BIT. BASE COURSE 10" 100% CRUSHED CLASS 5 AGGREGATE BASE 12" SUBCUT W/ SELECT GRANULAR SAND FILL DRAINING TO WEST . . . r CLASS II _ . 1 AGGREGATE SHOULDER (TYP.) • EA031EX1 NICOLS ROAD EXHOET 1\11St CITY OF EAGAN PROJ. NO _Amirk. - . TYPICAL SECTION COHEN MRS STREET AND TRAIL MN" city oF aagan _ _ _ ,, , •., l'-':- . „ \ . ,-- 1 , \ 0 . —. ----.... ( ) q-131'.' /1 1,. • ' J i 1 4's .%,...... 150.-42.\CMP , . 4? o 2oo\L"--\ -, • N G IN . e\C'\''. • : • cs1.._., , ...---... 7 020-55 , H20 ‘,> , i ..■. . 240 -421CMP .. Q, pl . _075 ,...,-,..., . - . \Q, .— ) 011-59 • 6 MH19 -• -- • .- .- ., r.. 515.-36.CMP ../. . ......--, - •... --. • 0 .-• .--- -. • .. . • - . . . 021-57 - . Li N. '\■ 012,59 ._. 7 ' • . • 4 \ • ---- , • ,, _ ••, . . _ ' • --t , ] 1 \ * ' • ' • \ „ . -- 8" W.M.-----_ _ :\+, _ •• , ' . :,, _ _ '77 .. - ___,,• .,,,_;r : L--- , , „--..-- dit■ 'T c ' - • ______--• ,--- , . - - ., •. . : , ••• _ _.,...,1 , ..___ . ..,..7L ; ' • , • .. . , . . . • . 02617,50 \ "-- ••• 12-1',1 .M. - ... • - • •.•.• ..... . . • • .. . 15" - •, . SR *07' -.. 0.■•.■■■-•0--EXISTING-STORM SEWER MH1 - ' EXISTING WATERMAIN 1 SIVER BELL ROAD ■ EXISTING SANITARY SE715_,,--/\ 1 EA031EX2 •• • ' ‘1. 48' RCP NICOLS ROAD ENNOC307 IllSt CITY OF EAGAN PROJ. NO. 681 4.•EXISTING UT1LIT1E8r) --". MEM DMZ t city of angan The anticipated costs of the proposed storm drainage improvements are also presented in the enclosed cost tabulation section of this report (Appendix A). Utility Improvements It is proposed to extend the existing watermain to the north to the approximate location of the proposed Nicols Depot, as describe in the Minnesota River Valley Trail System grant application. This watermain extension will provide water to the Nicols Depot for fire protection and drinking water supply. This improvement will consist of this installation of approximately 850 linear feet of six-inch ductile iron pipe watermain and a hydrant to serve the Depot. The City of Eagan staff should evaluate the economic feasibility of constructing this watermain extension as it will not be assessable to adjacent properties. • No additional sewer or water utility repairs or adjustments have been noted by the City of Eagan Public Works Staff. The only utility issues which would be included in the project plans are service requirements for the properties abutting Nicols Road. It is anticipated that only one sanitary sewer service would be required. Any additional utility repairs or adjustments to include gate valve repairs and replacement, hydrant relocation, and structure adjustments, would be completed at the City's expense. The estimated costs for utility extensions, repairs, and improvements are outlined in the cost tabulation section of this study. The financing of such repairs will be addressed later in the funding section of this report. PROJECT COSTS - _ The estimated construction costs for the proposed street improvements are presented in Appendix A included at the back of this report. The estimated overhead items such as engineering, city administration, fiscal and legal expenses have been estimated at 30% and a 5% contingency cost is included for variations in construction costs. The following is a summary of the anticipated costs for the project. • • PEAS-112.031 - 6 -7 112-031-10 ..) , w54EE.S •' . - . • W/ EROSION . i / '--- CONTROL 1 ol* 1%113 (., . s‘ --„, IMPROVEMENTS • 09' 1 -1‘ fr • it- c i• 5.4.1" TOMO . AO 4<, o l_l 200 •.--- tntri is s; . - C)NC)*C2 • ., . ......■.:■• 020-55 '""'■_..,SWE-4"STOR . 48*STORM ,.. , , 011—59 / ..-- „.... .— I 1 •• .\ ..... T • % .. \\' \ 0 \ 0 :...•••••••-*... ... • . _I . .... •. 021-57 12' % ' \ • '-' • . v 1--I , i H • -•\ i._ . ' \ , .... . -- --.. - ,,.„ \ • ="STO- M • - ------, t-.. ' , - • ..f- -...,..1 .•, , _..-- ...._, 4.* \ 1 - ( .--. ' Ir. _- -..._... • " 7_ . \ . , ------- I - --'. • . _. ... _ , ... _ :_-,50 • \ _ i -- 1 - , •._.-- -( V 0 . PROPOSED TSTORM SEWER ONNECT '•;- , \ REMOVE AND REPLACE TO is-nNG . . .... SIVER BELL ROAD - " EXISTING STORM SEWER 'ZA031EX2 " list NICOLS ROAD°. 681 EaXNEAlicir N .PROPOSED STORM ....V1 COSMIC MIME (REPLACE EXIST1N 7-7 city oF acicjcin , , . • ) . . • 54°F.E.S ,. .,....2;-",-1-'?. W/ EROSION o 0 ( CONTROL li• t'' , ..9- - ■ sN ._,' 4 IMPROVEMENTS 15 4i2:i . 54"ST01411 \ ,,. 454.‘ 52 - 0 11 200 __I •.—_ , ... o\->eicL• (•- , . N ,....-- G • ( ...-----.4:. ,.... ,. 020-55 ., „ . \ A - 0 ::"N r .--,42"STOR `• -' 30eSTORM f SEWER, I ' \ SEWER 1 ( A , .30-5 ) - ,- ,...... 0 c 011-59 f-- • I .-------, ,,. ... f ( \ 30"STORM • 4/ \\, •,—S 1 R . 021-57 o ,, •.'\, 012—.59 \ _ _ ,, , .•- -..... _. . \ '..., ,- .--- . _ ..,- ._. .._., , • ._- -- i ..._. . _i_ . .. • ....___. . _... -T ' .... .- • • •'-•.,-”, ,-.. .V.; . .!:::-. ; --.."- -:'---71 I • . • o2p55o • '. *--- ‘ '. ‘11' ' 11÷ . . _ . . __.... . ... .. __. ._ _ . _... __., , .. .. . . . .."-- P ../ .... ........■ .. t .".'....-.4 'PROPOSED ...'S1PO4 SEWER - ONNECT INSTALL PAR1.±41.:.'HIGH F1-0W.. ._ _TO ,!STING SIVER BELL ROAD • . --m -- 'IREUEF PIPE- ' — ., • . , EA031EX2" . • NICOLS ROAD IENHODIT CITY OF EAGAN PROJ. NO. 681 3 DD _ \1St PROPOSED STORM 0 ) COWIE MIMS (PARALLEL SYSTSE7r7 city oF aagan , i • . r ..) . • , ' ,1 I-I}. ■,,,,..._.../' I \ . / ...1 . • ; ...., $1! ..' J ( --- .0 ■ 4e. • c> - 'Set'CI- N'‘ . k.. .., Afic2 0 200 '...._—_. \ 4;5 ■_,...-1. \-‘ .--. . --... • 4' . • N . °° / \ - , 63 . f .)÷C -, ...... . 1•.. - 020-55 s-.: 4' • • .- .-. ..- ...../.:..-52 % "--\_.,,,,.........)— • ? ------- 0 '4 , 011—59 Z.. ..-. .- A ■ ...i „...( c -,. „. ..._ ....„ ,- _., \ ,../ ..., >77 : PROPOSED ■ • _ ----, u' .. .•- 021 57 \\ ''''.". ,, - L./ \ 7 * 012-59 - _ . _ i• — . ._ ,‘.0, .1 --•—4. -- 1 • V,, : • .•— PROPOSED _ I i PROPOSED t SEWER ___ SERVICE - SEOSICE - —:---: ! "— WATER & SEWER . - ...z. • •,.. - ilk ',.., —--.;:. — 7,— 7-0 -- • .. —''••. - - . . . • .. ; \N , - , - 023550 I • "----PROPOSED---e--.-.WATERMAIN • . . 1 ‘‘ SliVER _BELL ROAD - . EA031EX2 NICOLS ROAD - ENNOBOT VSt CITY OF EAGAN PROJ. NO. 681 _ PROPOSED UT1L1T1! --) COMTE MEE l , 2L city F aagan , , • • I. Street Costs $ 73,000 II.a. Storm Drainage Replacement 289,000 II.b. Parallel Storm Sewer Construction 151,000 III. Watermain Installation 34,000 N. Sanitary Sewer Service Installation t o,nno Estimated Total Project Cost Range $268,000 to 406,000 Based upon anticipated construction costs of up to $302,000 the estimated total project cost is between$268,000 and$406,000. This variability is dependent upon the condition of the existing storm sewer and the City's ability to utilize the parallel storm sewer alternate. Again, this cost includes a 5% contingency cost and 30% for indirect costs. Project Financing The recommended means of financing the reconstruction of Nicols Road is through a combination of special assessments to benefitted properties and use of the respective City major street and utility funds. The benefitted properties are proposed to be assessed in accordance with the City's current assessment policy. As previously noted, the assessment calculation would be based upon the current zoning and/or land use of the area. The City will assume a portion of the project costs for the street reconstruction, the cost for storm sewer improvements, and the costs associated with any necessary utility maintenance and repairs. Assessments will be levied against the adjacent properties based upon current land use and the equivalent costs to construct typical streets and water utilities to serve those uses.._.Ifroads and - utilities are-upgraded,to serve ultimate land uses based on zoning, additional assessments may be _ ��evied. Assessments,may be paid either upon completion of the assessment hearing or over a .� ,fifteen year period at the.interest rate obtained at the time of the bond sale. •- • Assessment Calculation - - Assessments are proposed to be levied against the benefitted properties as outlined in-the City of Eagan's current assessment policy for street reconstruction. A summary of the assessment policy for such a project is provided as Attachment D of the assessment manual and presented below. FEAS-112.031 - 7 - 112-031-10 ! , \ . (1 (9O19 / Gj4 0 200 • Nsi,_ . I .. I . . N. . , • . „---- , . , . O,, GGP G , (..... • 020-55■ / 2 r h1 •30—5 `'�i Cr ` 011-59 / Ns\\ CWS r 1 METERING ---,. STATION 9:e. ss_".....,;., • 021-57 012-74,.,5,_9 ^r— 1 76 v›-,,,,,..c li -.-,. rj ' , t 3785 NICOLS RD. • . .— .4 \\ 010--55 0 i.�5.0,{ �: :ter' \,,.. Z� �; —._ .. . .. .... •. , , . ,. ... . , OVA •0 `�._. .. . lop_�__. . �...._ .. _ T- -_._4_ -:..: IVER BELL ROAD , ...._--•---- ASSESS MENT r BOUNDARY 3786 NICOLS RD a r . _ — .y.. . • . . N!CO -ROAD CITY OF EAGAN PROJ. NO. 7 ASSESSMENT 41Pumc INCE 8S) city of act C1 n A preliminary assessment roll has been included as Appendix B of this report. The assessments presented are based upon preliminary cost estimates and current land uses or zoning. The assessments will be revised based upon the actual construction costs received at the time of project bidding. Znning Type Low Density Res. Commercial/Industrial ("immunity Cnllertnr Strut Aeceecer4 City - Acceeced City Bituminous Street Construction 50% 50% 100% 0% Storm Sewer Improvements 0% 100% 0% 100% Watermain Improvements 100% 0% 100% 0% Sanitary Sewer/Watermain Repairs 0% 100% 0% 100% • The method of determining the assessments per lot equivalent is presented below. As indicated in the above table, residents are not assessed for the replacement, repairs, or adjustments to existing utilities being included in this project. An additional item of note is that the assessment amount is based upon the projected construction costs and the City of Eagan Assessment Policy. Requirements of Minnesota Statute Chapter 429 must also be complied with regarding the benefit of the improvement to the affected properties. In accordance with City policy, appraisals may be done on affected properties to determine maximum assessment amounts. Street costs for the construction of the community collector roadway were used to arrive at the typical street property assessment for light industrial properties, as outlined below. In accordance with the City's current assessment policy regarding street assessments, a 50% credit is given to residential properties taking primary access onto a community collector. The cost of an equivalent •,.r 7-tton residential street is calculated and the 50% credit is then applied.' This is reflected in the - „-calculations below. The anticipated assessment rates for the respective portions of the project are . • ,,, presented below for the purposes of preparing the preliminary assessment roll. Street Assessment Estimated Residential Street Cost $41,000 divided by 730 linear feet of frontage Equals Industrial Assessment per front foot = $56.16/foot times 50% credit for residential property X 50% PEAS-112.031 - 8 - c 112-031-10 • Equals Residential Assessment per front foot = $28.08/foot times 85 feet X 85 feet Equals Residential Assessment per lot equivalent = $2,387/lot Storm Sewer Assessment = $0 Watermain Assessment = $0 Utility Service Assessment (actual cost of service assessed (Sewer/Water Service) estimated at $2,000 per service) According to assessment records provided by the City, all parcels have previously been assessed for lateral water. Based upon the previous assessments, it appears that the two residences are the only assessable properties within the project area. Since each of the residential parcels is large enough to be split, each is assigned two lot equivalents in calculating assessment amounts. These parcels are proposed to be assessed for street reconstruction and any required utility service installation. The U.S. Fish and Wildlife parcels may only be assessed under special agreement; therefore, it is recommended that those assessments be levied at the time U.S. Fish and Wildlife requests service. City Costs With only selected assessable properties, the preliminary assessment recovery is estimated at approximately $20,000. The remaining project costs are to be funded from City of Eagan revenues. The project area analyzed for the improvement is presented on Exhibit 6 and includes the following parcels: Prljeet Area Pmperty flecrriptinn PTT) Numher MCWS metering station • 012-59 3785 Nicols Road 020-50 • 3786 Nicols Road 010-55 US Fish and Wildlife 021-57 Fern Pederson 011-59 FEAS-112.031 - 9 - 3 112-031-10 Fern Pederson 020-55 U.S. Fish and Wildlife 010-57 MCWS northern station 013-52 Note: Only those parcels presented in bold type are proposed to be assessed. EASEMENTS AND PERMITS All street, watermain, and storm sewer work will be conducted within the existing 66-foot roadway right-of-way; therefore, no additional easements or right-of-way are anticipated. As the storm drainage improvements consist only of the replacement of existing culverts, replacement of existing storm sewer piping, and ditch improvements, it is not anticipated that any permits will be required. Regardless of this fact, the Engineer will contact the Corp of Engineers, the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, and the local watershed district to allow those agencies to comment prior to any construction taking place. PROJECT SCHEDULE The following schedule presents the proposed timeline for the reconstruction of Nicols Road. As the improvement will occur under the guidelines of Minnesota Statute 429 for Public Improvements, the timeline includes a public hearing and an assessment hearing. The schedule, as proposed, is as follows: City Council Receives Feasibility Report March 21, 1995 and Sets Public Hearing Public Hearing /City Orders Plans and Specifications April 18, 1995 • City Staff Receives Plans for Review - -• - May 2, 1995 City Council Receives Plans and Specifications / • • , May 16, 1995 - and Sets Bid Opening Bid Opening June 13, 1995 1;3 FEAS-112.031 - 10 - 112.031-10 • City Council Receives Bids / Awards Contract June 20, 1995 Construction Begins July, 1995 Construction Complete September, 1995 Assessment Hearing October 3, 1995 First Payment Due October 1996 CONCLUSION The cost of the Nicols Road street and storm sewer reconstruction is estimated between $268,000 and 406,000. These improvements include the reconstruction of the street to a 24-foot wide rural road section. In addition to roadway improvements, the project will include watermain installation, storm sewer replacement, grading and restoration of ditches, and utility repairs as required by the City of Eagan public works staff. The project would be financed using a combination of property assessments and City funds and will be completed in 1995 in accordance with the schedule provided in this report. The special assessments to adjacent properties are estimated on a lot specific basis as there are a limited number of properties to be assessed. The assessment will generate approximately $20,000, leaving up to $386,000 to be financed by the City of Eagan. The Nicols Road Street and Drainage Improvements project is technically feasible from an engineering standpoint. Economic feasibility of the project must be determined by review of the City of Eagan staff, City Council, and City Attorney based upon anticipated assessment issues. PEAS-112.031 - 11 - 6 J • 112.031-10 • • Appendix A Preliminary Cost Estimate Nicols Road Reconstruction Project City of Eagan Project No. 681 Unit Extended Item Unit Quantity Cost Cost I Street Reconstruction Remove Existing Bituminous SY 1200 $3.00 $3,600 Common Excavation CY 1600 $5.00 $8,000 Select Granular Material CY 450 $7.50 $3,375 Class Five Aggregate TN 750 $7.00 $5,250 Type 2341 Bituminous Base Course TN 150 $22.00 $3,300 Type 2341 Bituminous Wear Course TN 420 $24.00 $10,080 Bituminous Tack Coat GAL 60 $1.25 $75 Class 2 Shoulder Aggregate TN 75 $9.00 $675 Driveway Restoration EA 4 $1,000.00 $4,000 Pavement Striping LF 2400 $0.25 $600 Ditch Grading and Restoration SY 1000 $2.50 $2,500 Sod and Turf Restoration SY 5000 $2.50 $12,500 Estimated Construction Cost $53,955 5% Contingency Cost $2,698 30% Overhead Cost $16,187 Estimated Street Cost $72,839. Appendix A • • Preliminary Cost Estimate Nicols Road Reconstruction Project City of Eagan Project No. 681 II.a Storm Sewer Replacement Cost Remove and Replace 18" CMP LF 60 $25.00 $1,500 Remove and Replace 21" CMP LF 60 $30.00 $1,800 .Remove and Replace 24" CMP LF 60 $35.00 $2,100 Remove existing 36" RCP LF 400 $4.00 $1,600 Remove existing 42" CMP LF 1200 $4.50 $5,400 Install Storm Manhole EA 4 $1,500.00 $6,000 48" CMP Storm Sewer LF 900 $100.00 $90,000 54" CMP Storm Sewer LF 700 $120.00 $84,000 54" FES EA 1 $2,000.00 $2,000 Aggregate Bedding CY 500 $7.00 $3,500 Geotextile Grid SY 700 $12.00 $8,400 Low Density Backfill CY 350 $15.00 $5,250 Class II Rip Rap CY 12 • $75.00 $900 Erosion Control LS 1 $1,500.00 $1,500 Estimated Construction Cost $213,950 5% Contingency Cost $10,698 30% Overhead Cost $64,185 Estimated Storm Sewer Cost $288,833 11.b Parallel Storm Sewer Costs Remove and Replace 18" CMP LF 60 $25.00 $1,500 Remove and Replace 21" CMP LF 60 $30.00 $1,800 Remove and Replace 24" CMP LF 60 $35.00 $2,100 Reconstruct Storm Manhole EA 4 $1,500.00 $6,000 30" HDPE/CMP Storm Sewer LF 900 $45.00 $40,500 42" HDPE/CMP Storm Sewer LF 550 $55.00 $30,250 54" CMP Storm Sewer - LF • 150 $55.00 $8,250 54" FES EA 1 $1,500.00 $1,500 Aggregate Bedding • CY 500 . $7.00 $3,500 Geotextile Grid SY 700 $12.00 $8,400 . . Low Density Backfill CY 350 • $15.00 • $5,250 Class II Rip Rap _ CY • 12 $75.00 $900 Erosion Control . 1 $1,500.00 $1,500 Estimated Construction Cost $111,450 5% Contingency Cost $5,573 30% Overhead Cost $33,435 Estimated Storm Sewer Cost $150,458 7 7 • Appendix A Preliminary Cost Estimate Nicols Road Reconstruction Project City of Eagan Project No. 681 III. Watermain Costs Connect to Existing Watermain EA 1 $500.00 $500 Siphon Crossing EA 2 $1,500.00 $3,000 6-inch DIP Watermain LF 850 $24.00 $20,400 Hydrant w/ Valve EA 1 $1,500.00 $1,500 Estimated Construction Cost $25,400 5% Contingency Cost $1,270 30% Overhead Cost $7,620 Estimated Watermain Cost $34,290 V Utilityfiervice Costs Install Municipal Sewer Service EA 5 $1,481.50 $7,408 Estimated Construction Cost $7,408 5% Contingency Cost $370 30% Overhead Cost $2,222 Estimated Utility Service Cost $10,000 Estimated Street Cost $72,839 Estimated Storm Sewer Replacement Cost $288,833 Estimated Parallel Storm Sewer Cost $150,458 Estimated Watermain Cost $34,290 Estimated Utility Repairs Cost $10,000 ESTIMATED TOTAL PROJECT COST $268,000 to $406,000 _ ES • • • Appendix B Preliminary Assessment Roll Nicols Road Reconstruction Project City of Eagan Project No. 681 Parcel PID Assessment Footage/ Assessment Total Address Number Item Lot Equiv. Rate Assessment • 3785 Nicols Road SW 1/4 Sec. 18 Street Construction 2 $2,387.00 $4,774.00 020-50 Sanitary Sewer Service 1 $2,000.00 $2,000.00 Water Service 2 $2,000.00 $4,000.00 3786 Nicols Road SW 1/4 Sec. 18 Street Construction 2 $2,387.00 $4,774.00 010-55 Sanitary Sewer Service 1 $2,000.00 $2,000.00 Water Service 1 $2,000.00 $2,000.00 MWCC SW 1/4 Sec 18. None 0 $0.00 $0.00 Metering Station 012-59 SW 1/4 Sec. 18 None 0 $0.00 $0.00 020-55 SW 1/4 Sec.18 None 0 $0.00 $0.00 021-57 • SW 1/4 Sec 18. None 0 $0.00 $0.00 011-59 Estimated Total Assessment Recovery $19,548.00 Agenda Information Memo April 18,1995 j, PROJFaCT 664.WESCOTT SOVARC ADDN STREET,RECONSTRUCTION ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: Close the public hearing and approve/deny Project No. 664, Wescott Addition Square Street Reconstruction. FACTS: • The Wescott Square Addition Street Reconstruction is identified in the City's current 5-Year Capital Improvement Program. • The City Council received the feasibility report on March 21, 1995,and scheduled a public bearing for April 18, 1995. • Aninfarmational meeting concerning the improvements was held on April 13, 1995,at 610 PA- • All legal notices pertaining to the public bearing as well as written notification was mailed to all affected property owners. ISSUES: No issues have been identified to date. • ATTACHMENTS: • Feasibility Study p. 9./ // 7 • Minutes from Informational Meeting p. / q.0 ti A. % y • .`•',' i 1'I • city of Qcicjcln Report for Wescott Hills Additions Street and Utility Reconstruction City Project No. 664 Eagan, Minnesota April 1995 File No 49554 Bonestroo _„� J.- .. �...�_ . Rosene Anderllk & Associat s • Engineers b Architects St. Paul, Minnesota ! ... ' Bonestroo,Rosene,Anderlik and Associates,Inc.is an Affirmative Action/Equal Opportunity Employer BonestrooOtto G.Bonestroo,P.E. Howard A.Sanford,P.E. Michael C.Lynch.P.E. Gary D.Kristoftz,RE. . Rosene Robert W.Rosene,P.E.• Keith A.Gordon..P.E. James R.Maland,P.E. Brian K.Gage,P.E. .. Joseph C.Anderlik,P.E. Robert R.Pfefferle,P.E. Jerry D.Pertzsch,P.E. Keith R.Yapp,P.E. Anderlik & Marvin L.Sorvala,P.E. Richard W.Foster,P.E. Frederic J.Stenborg,P.E. Douglas J.Benoit.P.E. Richard E.Turner,P.E. David O.Loskota,P.E. Scott J.Arganek,P.E. Shawn D.Gustafson,P.E. Glenn R.Cook,P.E. Robert C.Russek,A.I.A. Kenneth P.Anderson,P.E. Cecllio Olivier,P.E.Paul G.Heuer.RE. Mark R.Rolfs,RE. Associates Robert G.Schunicht,P.E. Mark A.Hanson,EE Mark A.Selp,P.E. John P.Gorder,P.E. Susan M.Eberlin,C.P.A. Michael T.Rautmann,P.E. Gary W.Morten,P.E. Dan O.Boyum,P.E. Engineers&Architects •Senior Consultant Ted K.Field,P.E. Paul J.Gannon.A.I.A. Jeffrey J.Ehleringer,P.E. Thomas R.Anderson,A.I.A. Daniel J.Edgerton,P.E. Lee M.Mann,P.E. March 20, 1995 Donald C.Burgardt.P.E. A.Rick Schmidt,P.E. Charles A.Erickson Thomas A.Syfko.P.E. Philip J.Caswell,P.E. Leo M.Pawelsky Frederic J.Stenborg,P.E. Mark D.Wallis.P.E. . Harlan M.Olson Ismael Martinez,P.E. Miles B.Jensen,P.E. Agnes M.Ring Honorable Mayor&Council Michael P.Rau,P.E. L Phillip Gravel,P.E. James F.Engelhardt Thomas W.Peterson,P.E. Karen L Wlemeri,P.E. City of Eagan . 3830 Pilot Knob Rd. Eagan,MN 55122 Re: Wescott Hills Additions • Street and Utility Reconstruction . Project No. 664 Our File No.49554 Dear Mayor and Council: • Attached is our report for the Wescott Hills Additions, Street and Utility Reconstruction,Project No. 664. This report discusses the proposed street and utility reconstruction and presents cost estimates for these improvements. Also included is a preliminary assessment roll. . We will be pleased to meet with the City Council and other interested parties to discuss this report at a mutually convenient time. Yours very truly, B S O , ROSENE,ANDERLIK&ASSOCIATES,INC. / • or-----... Mark A.Hanson I hereby certify that this report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly ' . .Registered Professional Engineer under the laws of the S to of es . :_F,y,, ,.. • wed b,.� # - - • :,w iti . . P !, , '1� Mark A.Hanson - Ali. _ 4_ ALL. :_K..7;-.:...,:.:--- • - . Eagan Public orks Dept. Date: March 20. 1995 .-.Y ...:--.-, . Reg.No. 14260 . Date: �'�/g 5- Reviewed by: AM. • a Finance Department Date: 3 sq'c; . 2335 W st Highway 36 • St. Paul, MN 55113 • 612-636-4600 • • Table of Contents Item Page Number INTRODUCTION 3 SCOPE 4 FEASIBILITY AND RECOMMENDATIONS 6 . STREET EVALUATION 7 • DISCUSSION 9 Wescott Hills 9 Street Lights 10 Storm Sewer 10 Sanitary Sewer and Water Main Repair 10 • COST ESTIMATE 13 AREA TO BE INCLUDED 14 ASSESSMENT 15 REVENUE 17 PROJECT SCHEDULE 18 • APPENDIX A-PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE APPENDIX B -PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL Wescott Hills Additions Street and Utility Reconstruction 2 q3 _ _ • Introduction The City of Eagan,similar to other communities,is responsible for providing utilities and streets to serve existing and new developments. The City Officials and its Public Works Department are also responsible for maintaining and reconstructing these facilities in a timely manner as they approach the end of their useful life. These facilities must be properly and cost effectively maintained for the public's safety and welfare. Typically,utilities have a design life of 40 to 80 years dependent upon how they've been maintained and constructed, while streets have a design life of 25 to 30 years. The design life for streets is considerably less due to the nature of the materials that are used to build them and deterioration resulting from weather and traffic. The streets serving the Wescott Hills Additions were constructed in 1971. Wescott Square and Ivy Lane were constructed as part of a City of Eagan public contract,while Wescott Trail was constructed privately. Therefore, the streets have approached the end of their useful design life and are in a deteriorated condition requiring reconstruction and repair. It's important that property owners/homeowners and City officials know and are confident that the infrastructure system is being properly maintained and replaced at the most opportune time and at a reasonable cost for the longest period of time. In an attempt to better inform homeowners/property owners of the condition of their streets, the City of Eagan recently had structural and surface evaluations done on the streets in Wescott Hills. The results of the evaluations are presented in this report to help homeowners better understand the condition of their streets. These evaluations are based on technical and objective observations made by representatives trained in this work. Wescott Hills Additions Street and Utility Reco ucti n 3 • • • Scope This project provides for reconstructing 0.43 miles of existing streets in Wescott Hills shown on Figure No. 1. Wescott Trail is not a public street and therefore is not included in this project. Improvements are also proposed to the existing sanitary sewer and water main systems. • • Wescott Hills Additions Street and Utility Reconst ctiZ-- 4 J .. \ I '‘,... ....-••. 9:.?.C...4A•12.4.':'RO • j------'7.7.-1.-----7"-- „ r---,\,L...1....1..11...- : • -•:, •• • 4 ..,, ..,----- r r T i I ; \I, 1 •.....„ •• . / •-•......,,.: 1 . ,1 1...1.._....1 ...,..,1.,.:.,--.., t--t=..]:, ,.‘..--\ .... . ,--- - i t• , I.- —...., •.• i ---T ; : • • • 1 ,.....„.• -74\- •:....\ ...... E_.÷...4.-..: .....1 : ... : ; 1 . I : .,-...... ., \ ..... ..:,, I \ ,. ii I ,-- - : ‘ . ---- i.......................„ : .A, - - ; I ' I I i .... .._... I I i i 1 I I I I I ../. N.,'''.:(' / \'':‘, <4-*. .."4.... 4. N ''' 1 \:•••%!-' ...-- ii ,, ..- .„, i ---' -",..44-*'..-7".....--1;-:<.---r.------,-,—;W\„vi .., —,/ ; I -7---- !_77-,4 —1:-........:•• .\\ r ks:...k..‹. ,..`,?, : : , .. \\. z,.. ks< . ...6 ..,.. i ,---:1 : r 11—,- ,,z,. ,;•;:c .,./1 _..1._..., \\I--<-.›,„`*--<:;A: „----) - i AVALON ARE 1\ ' ••/ •• j I /• ,,,,,, •, 4.„ ,: I • -- T - \ .<<\•Y ■•••,/ < A ii. ,\ :. '•-•„-z:,7 /! --. • l i,.....:_i i!I H I i milli 1 Ilm,rivi ---..:-," : : ,,. .• ..,. 1 .., --''''...'=. ti-4 .1.4"i "......,`.1-/' / :,.< ... si/ 1/ r=4533E-2rriTTAWALI -i1-(1j.4-; A 'N./•\, .).4, "V/ 4-1,.., %LAD •-•:'N,■\ ....) `1-1 I i ,i• &....„1.1 \..,/ / >(\z: , b.,..-4 • ■ ....... , 1 =IH MIMI --- ; h 7...; =1.• FL,,ei 1 N.,( \/-4.NV ,... N.,...,,,, , r.„ I--- ,, -..... . i tzi L-- ..e-di '<5; i —1L---/ sy'>N, .. .•)Y /---- Putssou , .I 1101USII. ... • I \.\< I \\ \4 :It-u•.'4._:111_1,,•'' : ' I i c.: ;‹30‘.. .." •••-", ..\\,,>% / • 1-''"' n-- \\ i k • 1!* .jt.4 —.r : - i7. sifsii,44. 1 L i '1<ncy/ 4 r"-"I • --.... ,.. •. I-7n 1 . . I [14 Blai-7. ...' il I 1 / ; ••-', 'II : I ; 1 i I : -..77.,&;‘-7x. /. • t• —• •• j cz. i ,• ../ / 2 2_11i I I It'1014'Ip/ke, Lip , 11-1--] .._... _ L..". / -7--t L..6 .._J• _....., .....;:„....„, -..-:_;.... .... /p-g, :.\\Aalg- .E' I irri--- cir\--) x , . ..i. ill, i LONE ONI RO --••••••;-, ..-....1...•--rri.-L. ,,,'N.,,,,,,,,,---: =., i li. • I tH-1 -1-'-'' ff.C.r:Frl 1 11iN . 5 5 1:31I 1 V / 5/c/ ; ! - i -'‘;i 1 ,-.....\\ ••,' l._- I I ICJ .5 . i ,.........:/ / /7-----1 1 1: „ rirruirni-Hi Hir•••; .1__ G—iiir ...:•-•-tc.le I /TIrti'r! i - ......4 ILILIZII: ii --4, 'mi. ;:. ilitTrr _ I 1 A 4/ ii 7: • - -7f .• i ,_________61,r 1 eirtertn U BE r :-.4) , I/ / / li -,--rii i • '*1 4.1 .,c, 1........ / / I I J11 1 • : ' 11 \c •4'---.,::: ! \ \\•.;,./... -...-,0•?•47:rrti• II -•41:.;'50AIL V i / IIIII-5 c 7 s •''' ' ‘ 1 1 I .A j Il 4 mut i It* Pal ....r 4,z,lzi.r1,._-.4%. / / 11",: .1„....11 j I 1111111ln fit --- glitligrli If -.1. J.]. l'a 126 '-'-' / I --i ..1t. \ r 1 - i i )4/ ', L li 1 i,-0 s.--.,0 3 i I it., r •) /7 fa ri ..,/,/,11'd ..../) I ....-k.,,... . V \N ri- 5 1 1111,111W z 11 • ill g-. , -I-. _ -.=§ II EFL, I Pro Oct Location — 1 . i..... .._.c., , HI IL-- ,...: . ., -_-_-.41----- I irn , I .T.:1 / e , p • Wescott ' ----1-.r' --- j / * i Hilts —1 .J E , ri nvoa aws Ro 2) morioocer ROAD - A L_rri 1 \L-1-1 / rill-FIE 1 1 k .p._, • l " ;ft^' .::'.7 LL‘k ....."--t 1 rid \\ iii l I i • .;'•;',' '' . 1441',.7. ,. '''''y A■....1 1 I ,i.=.,=II ...,......,11 I • :j • ;; : : 1 • !---- ... . ... . '4 . . ,...:, II : =..,,,,,.::. - • , .•,,,,i-m,..-. s. ,..„...../ , ■ 1 i ,..-- • 7417-rk;„---,-....15 ',..-...;__..8 l'Nfl.L 3— ‘1 : .r.Ogi?,g :Lre r 1 43 1....,.,rL----.---, I 7.:■4:::..Wt;/.?.re:f\I( C....''' 11 1...:,,--ib , 1 1_1 ._,.......: ,.. ...„4.,...-.4.zirtg...: .„_, LI 'N\.„ ' -14...A`c... -r4t, ----' / 1:19 Fir-11 ' !I ta..,a`,1! \--JF-T-7 "."-j-1 -: \‘ ' ' 'LIEOL-LjullEm 1 '7.-7.,_.1 ..'W,. :-...s --•-' ,....5--,-.."-"-Ir-5- ••• v.....W... , 7-1".. f b.1-.'44 -C.- ",. i 1 187,-2E.7.7. ---,i_ T-,a2.-.7 • 1.7,..__Lac. . Ars/ m....,, . ,)4,7,:: r..5 -•*.,5), tz....-re.! 1.4.f. T -,. Itv - , 1 t.l.--_-......-s-swiT.- _,c:..., ,....„&„*:,, , ; , --„,v, . ii/7./41.—:', ..ii-Vr.-k:..L.. .. : -7.(..s--N.A.,41:...-,m1 ,,.,,' .. L....1:We, ■ ! _ .,_„ii,F1 r=M,,V-4r7..,-44477._!„,•• ••'CX dil ..,-',.,(Isa ; IT.I(' NV/4--4 ' ....-. 1/.>„.-7N1-''''-'-',.\\7.•,<',Iji'-'6:Cf.,-... EiD' i___I\'± -- murk-------,--1‘ mi -_-F- --'r's• i FT9M .. ' • -<(. 1-IPI>1 5 -= ( ._..4....,..1. .., „...--••••6,0 , =55••-=....,.... , / .... z.....Y _F-..... ,e...}, I ...-, ...• fzI• /. i-I \'',..1V(.... .,, g_ . 7- -114,":.0 . \:,- I '• -. 1E2,0 „., ,-• ,..: ..." )6-7, -1.1 .. .1:.- ,,‘,,,,, 1......4.-,1,.. . ,,...-- ; , . . 1 -.,;A t•-= I`tr...5-; * b, --.., ,;.• wescorr Ro 1.- ' I 1 .:>-'441/1=P I P •-.:,/"W 11/ ....-. 1%.,,,-1,••• •.. I Izi •••:-,-.," --'.. r-- _ e_ • % . i i -1-----`'---.. _-- . • = ._ n gn''t_-':' .,. • . 0 moo 2c, 1:2mimmem - Seals in feet LOCATION PLAN , ifjj Bon stroo us Rosen EAGAN, MINNESOTA FIGURE 1 vii Anderlik a STREET & UTILITY RECONSTRUCTION Associates CITY PROJECT No. 664 49554R0.3.DWG APRIL 1995 CIM49554 • • • Feasibility and Recommendations This project is feasible from an engineering standpoint and is in accordance with the Master Street Plans for the City of Eagan. The project can best be carried out as one contract. • • • • • Wescott Hills Additions Street and Utility Reconstruction 6 Cl 7 • Street Evaluation . The streets in Wescott Hills are proposed to be reconstructed as part of this project. The justification • for street reconstruction is based on the following: • Street Age • Structural Strength • Surface Condition In accordance with engineering standards,the anticipated life of a street pavement is 25 to 30 years. As previously mentioned,the life of a street is based on the materials that are used to build them,the weather,and the amount and type of traffic to which they are subjected. Wescott Square and Ivy Lane are both greater than 20 years old. Therefore,each street has approached its design life based on its age. The desired structural strength of a local street is a 7 to 9 ton design. The heavier design thickness is recommended due to the size of service vehicles (garbage trucks, delivery trucks, school buses,etc.) presently serving residential neighborhoods. In the case of the streets in the project area, the recommended overlay thickness for all streets ranged between 1" to 21/2" based on a 9-ton design requirement. The structural testing was done by use of a Road Rater, which is an electro-hydraulical device which imposes a load to the roadway and measures its deflection. Based on the measured deflection,a recommended equivalent overlay thickness is determined to prevent the deflection based on the required load. • The final and.most important consideration for evaluating an existing street is its surface condition. ... The pavement Condition Index(PCI)ranks the surface condition of each street. Table l..presents the .. . categories which define PCI Rankings. Table 1 PCI Recommended Improvement 55-100 Routine(Crack Seal/Seal Coat) - 35-55 Patch/Repair and/or Overlay 0-35 Reconstruct Wescott Hills Additions Street and Utility Reco str tion 7 In general, PCI Rankings below 35 require removal of the existing bituminous pavement before constructing a new bituminous surface. In some cases, based on soil borings and further field - - -. investigation-during construction,the existing aggregate base may also have to be reconstructed. PCI Rankings between 35 and 55 require patching before constructing a bituminous overlay. PCI Rankings over 55 typically don't require bituminous overlays,and generally routine maintenance such as crack sealing and seal coat is adequate. The rankings for Wescott Square fall within the - .: -"Reconstruct"category. Therefore,based on the PCI Rankings, street reconstruction is recommended on Wescott Square Street. Most of Ivy Lane's PCI rankings fall-within the "Patch/Repair and/or Overlay" category, while a portion of Ivy Lane is classified in the "Reconstruct" category. It is proposed to mill the bituminous surface at the,concrete gutter and construct a bituminous overlay in the areas of Ivy Lane in the "Patch/Repair and/or Overlay" designation. The remainder of Ivy Lane is proposed to be reconstructed with new aggregate base and bituminous surface. • Wescott Hills Additions Street and Utility Recons tion 8 cr,c • Discussion Wescott Hills Streets proposed to be improved in Wescott Hills are presented on Figure No.2. The existing street section is shown on Figure No. 3. The existing street section includes existing concrete curb and gutter on Wescott Square and Ivy Lane. The existing bituminous surface and aggregate base varies in thickness. Street construction proposed on Wescott Square includes removal and reconstruction of curbs in need of repair. Driveway and boulevard restoration is required where concrete curbs are repaired. The existing bituminous surface will be completely removed and a new 3" thick bituminous surface will be constructed on a new 3" thick aggregate base as presented on Figure No. 3. Street construction proposed on Ivy Lane will include milling the existing bituminous surface and constructing a bituminous overlay in areas where the pavement condition does not warrant bituminous surface removal(Figure No. 3). Areas that do wan-ant existing bituminous removal on Ivy Lane will be constructed as discussed for Wescott Square. The intersection of Wescott Square at Yankee Doodle-County Road 28 is proposed to be reduced in width from 46 feet to 32 feet in accordance with the City of Eagan street standards,as shown on Figure No. 2. Also, as part of the Dakota County reconstruction of Yankee Doodle Road-County Road 28,a center median will be constructed at Wescott Square to limit traffic flow to right turns only into and out of Wescott Square Street. The intersection of Ivy Lane at Yankee Doodle Road will be 2... ., :_ ;;.irtatained at.its.present width of 32 feet,with left and right turn motions allowed from Ivy Lane onto Yankee Doodle Road. • presented'as a street reconstruction option is the reclamation of the existing bituminous surface • - -and gravel base for use as aggregate base before a new 3"thick bituminous surface is placed. The .• _ reclamation process involves mixing and processing the existing bituminous surface and underlying . _ aggregate base to_create the needed aggregate base. It is expected if the reclaimed bituminous surface - -. option is-constructed, a 5%-10% cost savings may result over completely removing the existing bituminous surface and constructing a new 3" thick aggregate base surface. Wescott Hills Additions Street and Utility Reconstruction 9 • In summary,the new aggregate base option or reclaimed aggregate base option would provide the desired life expectancy for the street reconstruction. Street Light No improvements are proposed to the existing street lights in Wescott Hills abutting Wescott Square _ . and Ivy Lane. Improvements would be considered at the request of the property owners. Storm Sewer . The existing storm sewer serving the Wescott Hills area is adequate to collect the expected runoff from Wescott Square and Ivy Lane. Therefore,no new storm sewer or extensions are proposed. Sanitary Sewer and Water Main Repair Utility reconstruction includes minor improvements to the existing sanitary sewer system. These improvements include the removal of all 24"diameter sanitary sewer castings and replacing them with new 27"diameter covers with concealed pick holes. - Eagan Public Works is presently reviewing the existing water distribution system serving this area. ' At this time it's recommended five 2" curb stop and boxes be reconstructed. Wescott Hills Additions Street and Utility Reconstruction 10 ( Q/ J I IcCC I I\VL.vlv,., i i..vs-d u , ..+i-%•1.- I EXISTING CONCRETE CURB -_ (SEE INTERSECTION BELOW) W 1 YAN;(EE DOODLE ROAD p • WESCOTT HILLS 3RD ADD-j PROPOSED UNITS - --- 21111 11N6 =X==1•m—=V a=era CNN X moo———N im XXXXX=R • r HIL S 4T ADD 1 y F :sco c7 7 '" WESC O TT So UAR_E + °r W;.7 20TT.� •HI S` /) -w �-.- - - - r.. L �Q`�VS44 C``� 1 i.I ; 4 41'eccot, � }5 r i 19 f 18 i514:312i Z LLiq i © s ' Or17 t6 O 1 ;: �� 14 0 1 ."Ons /'ark TRAI �► + , o N 15 ,8 2 ,= :. .qQ�� 7 8 9 10 1 12 13 14 I ,-r--'-t . 5 C 9 M DV T O :--_ W •C3n? HILLS REV 3R AD .MI IMI =I II—1�MI s'"a=—w>;�saw,�I�— TRAILS END ROAD PROJECT AREA LEGEND e z! o WESCOTT:Al LLS .�%PROD REV. 2NADD.° tSO J°0 Driveway Access j:�EJCOTT' R4t.y. LOTS Scala in fan JI. I YANKEE _ DOODLE RD (Co. Rd. 128) I - ----- - - - - , -- ---__,—- --___"q_____ - ler / ..- -6 , , .....,...,, • 1 F =e " NOTE Q 46' I No left turn•—'� Ex. I ant Yankee•.:' 2 1 a I , Doodle Road .-.__ I 32 I 1 _...•- - 0 1 New 1 W I I U f• k il #. ,_ aria. STREET IMPROVEMENTS zi Bonestroo Rosen EAGAN, MINNESOTA FIGURE 2 vii And Mk a STREET & UTILITY RECONSTRUCTION Associat s CITY PROJECT No. 664 49554R04.DWG April 1995 COMM.//^^� 49554 / J0' J , 30' - 28'132' • . 16' 16' Ex. Conc. Curb i 1._-- _J 1 1/2"—2 1/2" Bituminous Existing Aggregate Base (Variable Thickness) EXISTING SECTION • 30' • 30' 32' • 16' 16' Ex. •Cons. Curb DESIGN GRADE L- 6" CROWN I i .J 1" Type 41 Bituminous Wear Cc Note: —2" Type 31 Bituminous Base Cc Remove existing bituminous 3" Class 5 Aggregate Base surface. Repair existing (New or Reclaimed) concrete curb & gutter as required. PROPOSED SECTION Mill Bituminous Surr'c 7 _--___ __r__-{%_ _---T--------------------� r -__�.___- _r_---r•-_,,um.'-4_--�• . E . Bituminous Surface 1 1/277-2" Type 41 . - (2" —3 1/2" Thick) - Bituminous Overlay Ex. Aggregate Base(6"—12" Thick) -:__, _ - - ° - EXISTING SECTION PROPOSED SECTION . = - . _Portions of Ivy Lone OVERLAY Ex. BIT. SURFACE TYPICAL STREET SECTIONS IA Bonestroc Ro ene EAGAN, MINNESOTA FIGURE 3 Associate: STREET & UTILITY RECONS TRUCTION Engine rah Arehlt eta CITY PROJECT No. 664 2335 West Highway 3e 49554R06.dwg APRIL 1995 COMM. 49554 St. Paul, Minnesota S ( D3 1 • Cost Estimate A preliminary cost estimate is presented in Appendix A at the back of this report and is summarized below: New Reclaimed Aggregate Aggregate Base Base I. Street A. Bituminous Street Reconstruct Wescott Square $ 58,590 $53,610 Ivy Lane 27,005* 28,290 B. Concrete Curb Repair Wescott Square 21,535 21,535 Ivy Lane 4,680 4,680 II. Sanitary Sewer/Water Main Repair 9.355 9.355 Total $121,165 $117,470 *With Patch/Mill/Overlay The total estimated project cost for new aggregate base and reclaimed aggregate base includes contingencies and indirect costs. Contingency costs are estimated at 10%, while indirect costs are estimated at 35%,which includes legal,engineering, administration, and bond interest. Wescott Hills Additions Street and Utility Reconstruction 13 t/O Area To Be Included The area to be included for assessment purposes is presented on Figure No.4 and listed below: • No. of Units Wescott Square Block 1,Lots 1-5 5 _ Block 2,Lots 1-18 18 Outlot G 11 Wescott Hills Revised 2nd Addition • Block 1,Lots 1-16 64 Block 2,Lots 1,2 5 Wescott Hills 3rd Addition Block 1,Lots 2-5 4 Wescott Hills Revised 3rd Addition Block 1,Lots 1-14 - • 56 Block 1,Lots 15-19 10 Wescott Commons Park 0 Wescott Hills 4th Addition Block 1,Lots 1-8 31 • Block 2,Lots 1,2 4 Total No. of Units 208 • Wescott Hills Additions Street and Utility Reconstruction 14 o C` ti • O O C o • N:11, ■eadaadSOUROOMBOUaaAaaaa 1 m¢a a (4 1111 ■ ��� ��� X 10)1 O :it -- i `l . . Z t°i v n0 a i is al p 11; ���p:_ 1 0 ; f•, : .. G •© 0 �1 .r 04 ■ Q ca pE U �� e0D^ii,�C� y � � � � ..... 0 CC LI° N s C ■ -.- z I 3(1188 �°■° �' 6D -0 ►� "� a z •• awz ) is Jai ERR�9 :. «.«.w�.a..M : '( O N . SN17700 :i 3Nb 7 .Vli ° �, 3)ilW e °° ®^ is Q Cc Li LiW .. ritl __ / : pm. 1-21—"Hi e 3 8 N AL,..,..1--- Ct t.i.j (z a, Cr ; 4 0 � a ai ® ^ ji : � F " i 0N avoe 1---..---. cc_ gi e ® `° 0 �''_= 0N3 cn A \ E (na3 �: ®^ ®^ Z ; S7/b'�Jl a) H lc; ■ rmrsrim ink i ■ J a: e ,1 , : a 0 z (n Z a s ® v, W; :----®� , ; L1 z Q _. :1 - �-----� Q ; ® ^ a° w C) ap 1 iQ ,t, `� ; •°O �ti ■. ® 6— e. : a Q 0 >` O 4.1 41 °i ,� ('�j S, Q a•") > W C J O 's :i N f o^ : : ' 0 0 4 2: ® : I. Z is �1 0 i4.3 cz II i.c, w tea: ® '4,,Q,� ® ^ ;:� O : : . ;r ■ : rn 1 ® � ; a O < z g - . ,� � :Z. ®NI s • ®o w ; ® �= : � � U s -� I a w Z. 3 ®N rr� : ■ ill 0 - 7 .1 . •-" ' 2: 8- ler. 8* se- ON ilk L-Lj–, z • 0 U a • . o iiaiIUUIUIUU IlUhulIflha�aa��anr a. 6 a °I Z N1Z r O (n � 4 , w z_ 0W IQ J (r ---"-z-- r 2 v0i �d 0 a 1 Uj Z W 0 0 cc i • Z a 6tz0I N l 0 & • • Assessment Assessments are proposed to be levied against the benefitted property in accordance with the City of Eagan's Assessment Policy for Street Reconstruction, which is summarized below. A preliminary assessment roll is included in Appendix B located at the back of this report. All costs will be revised based on final project costs. Residential Assessed City - .- • .•. .. . Bituminous Street Reconstruction 75% 25% Repair Existing Concrete Curb 0% 100% • Sanitary Sewer/Water Repair 0% 100% For purposes of this report,it's proposed to assess 75%of the project cost for new aggregate base and patch/mill/overlay for Wescott Square ($58,590) and Ivy Lane ($27,005)on a unit basis. One-half of the assessable street project cost(0.50 x $27,005) for Ivy Lane is proposed to be assessed to the 34 units of the Wescott Square Addition along the east one-half of Ivy Lane. In the event the reclaimed aggregate base option is constructed,it's estimated a 5%-10%reduction could result based on the estimated assessments presented herein for Wescott Square street. The estimated assessments for Wescott Square Addition will be essentially the same whether the reclaimed aggregate base option or new aggregate base with patch/mill/overlay is used. The assessment per unit for the west one-half of Ivy Lane and Wescott Square street is determined by whether direct driveway access is to Wescott Square and Ivy Lane. Those units which have direct driveway-access to Wescott Square and Ivy Lane will be assessed one equivalent unit,.while those units which don't have direct driveway access to Wescott Square and Ivy Lane will be assessed one-- half equivalent,unit,. Listed below is the estimated assessment per equivalent unit based on.direct . -•-driveway access to Wescott Square and Ivy Lane and no direct driveway access to Wescott Square and Ivy Lane. • - - . Direct No Direct Driveway Access Driveway Access Street Cost Equivalent/Unit $426 $213 • Wescott Hills Additions Street and Utility Reconstruc on 15 l(f-•' • The assessments for Wescott Square Addition will be as follows: Street Cost Equivalent/Unit $298 The property owner will have the option at the time of the assessment hearing to pay the assessment in full following the assessment hearing or include the assessment as part of their property tax statement. If the assessment is included on their property tax statement,the assessment will be spread over a period of time and at an interest rate determined by bond sales at the time of the final assessment hearing. If the assessment is spread over a 15-year period at an 8.5%interest rate,the following payment schedule will result: Wescott Square Street and Ivy Lane • Direct Driveway Access: Estimated Assessment/Unit=$426 Principal/ Interest/ Cost/ Cost/ Year Year Year Month 1st Year $29 $36 $65 $6 15th Year 29 3 32 3 No Direct Driveway Access: Estimated Assessment/Unit=$216 Principal/ Interest/ Cost/ Cost/ Year Year Year Month 1st Year $14 $18 $32 $3.00 15th Year 14 2 16 1.50 • Wescott Square Addition s . Estimated Assessment/Unit=$298 Principal/ Interest/ Cost/ - Cost/ Year Year Year Month 1st Year $20 $25 $45 $4 15th Year 20 2 22 ' 2 Wescott Hills Additions Street and Utility Reconstructio 16 /C7V Revenue A summary of revenue sources is listed below. The estimated project costs are based on the construction of an entirely new aggregate base on Wescott Square Street and patch/mill/overlay and new aggregate base for Ivy Lane. Project Cost Revenue Balance I. Street A. Bituminous Street Reconstruction - Wescott Square $ 58,590 $51,972 -$6,618 Ivy Lane 27,005 12,262 - 14,743 B. Concrete Curb Repair Wescott Square 21,535 0 -21,535 Ivy Lane 4,680 0 -4,680 II. Sanitary Sewer/Water Main Repairs 9.355 0 -9.355 Total $121,165 $64,234 $56,931 The anticipated project deficit is$56,931,which will be the responsibility of the major street fund and respective utility funds. • Wescott Hills Additions Street and Utility Reconsittructio 17 Project Schedule Present Feasibility Report March 21, 1995 Public Hearing April 18, 1995 Approve Plans and Specifications May 16, 1995 Award Contract June 20, 1995 Substantial Completion August 15, 1995 Assessment Hearing October 1995 First Payment Due w/Property Tax Statement May 1996 Wescott Hills Additions Street and Utility Reco truc yn 18 r Appendix A Preliminary Cost Estimate Wescott Hills Additions Street and Utility Reconstruction . • Project No.664 L Street A) Bituminous Street Reconstruction 1) Wescott Square: New Aggregate Base Option 4600 SY Remove bituminous pavement @$2.25/SY $10,350 800 TN Class 5 aggregate base w/excavation @ $8.50/TN 6,800 550 TN Bituminous base course @ $13.00/TN 7,150 275 TN Bituminous wear course @$14.00/TN 3,850 50 TN Bituminous mat'l for mixture @$130.00/IN 6,500 6 EA Remove/reconstruct exist.CB @ $500.00/EA 3,000 50 LF 15"RCP storm sewer @ $24.00/LF 1,200 4 EA Adjust GV structure @ $150.00/EA 600 Subtotal $39,450 + 10%Contingency 3,950 Subtotal $43,400 +35%Indirect Costs 15,190 Total $58.590 Wescott Hills Additions Street and Utility Reconstruction 19 • 2) Wescott Square: Reclaimed Aggregate Base Option 4,600 SY Reclaim bituminous surface @$2.00/SY - $9,200 4,600 SY Subbase preparation @$1.00/SY 4,600 550 TN Bituminous base course @ $13.00/TN 7,150 275 TN Bituminous base course @ $14.00/TN 1850 50 TN Bituminous mat'l for mixture @ $130.00/TN 6,500 6 EA Remove/reconstruct exist.CB @ $500.00/EA 3.000 50 LF 15"RCP storm sewer @ $24.00/LF 1200 4 EA Adjust GV structure @ $150.00/EA Ann Subtotal $36,100 • • - +10%Contingency 'I 6 • Subtotal $39,710 +35%Indirect Costs 11 90(1 Total $41,610 Wescott Hills Additions Street and Utility Reconstruction 20 //� B) Bituminous Street Reconstruction 1) Ivy Lane: New Aggregate Base Option(with Patch/Mill/Overlay) 1.000 SY Remove bituminous pavement @$3.25/SY $ 3,250 1,300 • SY Mill bituminous pavement @$3.00/SY 3,900 300 TN Class 5 aggregate base w/excavation @ $8.50/I'N 2,250 175 TN Bituminous base course @$13.00/1N 2,275 190 TN Bituminous wear course @$14.00/1N 2,660 25 TN Bituminous mat'l for mixture @ $130.00/TN 3,250 4 EA Adjust GV structure @ $150.00/EA - 600 Subtotal • $18,185 +10%Contingency 1,820 Subtotal $20,005 +35%Indirect Costs 7,000 ' Total I $27,005 2) Ivy Lane: Reclaimed Aggregate Base Option 2,300 SY Reclaim bituminous surface @$2.00/SY $4,600 2,300 SY Subbase preparation @ $1.00/SY 2,300 350 TN Bituminous base course @ $13.00/TN 4,550 175 TN Bituminous wear course @ $14.00/TN 2,450 35 TN Bituminous mat'l for mixture @ $130.00/TN 4,550 4 EA Adjust GV structure @ $150.00/EA 600 • Subtotal $19,050 +10%Contingency 1,905 Subtotal $20,955 +35%Indirect Costs 7,335 Total $28,290 Wescott Hills Additions Street and Utility Reconst on 21 / 1" • • C) Repair Existing Concrete Curb 1) Wescott Square • 1,000 LF Remove concrete curb and gutter @ $2.50/LF $2,500 1,000 LF Concrete curb and gutter @ $8.00/LF 8,000 300 SY Driveway repair @ $10.00/SY 2,000 1,000 SY Sod @ $2.00/SY 2,000 Subtotal $ 14,500 +10%Contingencies 1,450 Subtotal $15,950 +35%Indirect Costs 5.585 Total I $21,535 2) Ivy Lane 300 LF Remove concrete curb and gutter @ $2.50/LF $ 750 300 LF Concrete curb and gutter @ $8.00/LF 2,400 200 SY Sod @ $2.00/SY 400 Subtotal $3,150 +10%Contingencies 315 Subtotal $3,465 +35%Indirect Costs 1,215 Total I $4,6,10 I • Wescott Hills Additions Street and Utility RecozstrucJion 22 / ( • II. Sanitary Sewer and Water Main Repairs 5 EA Remove&replace curb box&stop @ $700.00/EA $3,500 7 EA Remove&replace rings&casting @ $400.00/EA Rnn Subtotal _ $6,300 +10%Contingencies 610 Subtotal $6,930 +35%Indirect Costs 9 4,5 Total $9,14c • Wescott Hills Additions Street and Utility Reconstruction— . 23 /�J ' Appendix B Preliminary Assessment Roll • Wescott Hills Additions " Street and Utility Reconstruction Project No.664 Parcel Description 1 No.Units 1 Street Cost/Unit 1 Total Assessment A) Lots/Units Driveway Access Wescott Square/Ivy Lane Wescott Hills Rev.2nd Add'n Block 1,Lots 9-16 32 $426(1) $13,632 Block 2,Lots 1,2 5 426 2,130 Wescott Hills 3rd Add'n Block 1,Lots 2-5 4 426 1,704 ' Wescott Hills Rev.3rd Add'n Block 1,Lots 18, 19 4 426 1,704 Wescott Hills 4th Add'n Block 1,Lots 1-3 6 426 2,556 Block 1,Lots 4-8 25 426 10,650 Block 2,Lots 1,2 4 426 1,704 Subtotal I 80 I I. $34,080 B) Lots/Units No Driveway Access Wescott Square/Ivy Lane Wescott Hills Rev.2nd Add'n • Block 1,Lots 1-8 32 $213 $_6,816 Wescott Hills Rev.3rd Add'n Block 1,Lots 1-17 62 213 13,206 Subtotal I 94 I I $20,022 C) Wescott Square Addition -1/2 Costs of Ivy Lane • • Wescott Square Block 1,Lots 1-5 5 $298 m $ 1,490 . Block 2,Lots 1-18 18 298 5,364 Outlot G 11 298 3,278 ISubtotal I 34 I I $10,132 Totals 208 1 $64,234 Wescott Hills Additions Street and Utility Reconstruction 24 (( CP .0) Street Cost/Unit=($58,590+$13,505)x 0.75/80+0.5 (94)=$426 m Street Cost/Unit-Wescott Square Addition=($27,005 x 0.5)x 0.75 _34=$298 Wescott Hills Additions Street and Utility Reconstru ' n 25 EAGAN MRINT. FAC. TEL:612-681-4360 Apr 14 95 12 :04 No .007 P.03 ,,.,tip,,,�,4 MEMO _city of ea an - � TO: FILE FROM: MIKE FOERTSCH, ASSISTANT CITY ENGINEER DATE: APRIL 14, 1995 SUBJECT: PROJECT NO. 664, WESCOTT HILLS ADDITION INFORMATIONAL MEETING SUMMARY A neighborhood informational meeting was held as 6:30 P.M. on April 13, 1995 at the Eagan Municipal Center to discuss the above referenced proposed improvements. The attendance at the meeting were the following: Eagan Staff Members-Mike Foertsch BRAA Consulting Engineers-Mark Hanson and John Gorder Property Owners - David Maier- 101 160th Lane NW, Andover, MN B.J. Larson -845 Wescott Square, Eagan, MN Tim Gustafson-845 Wescott Square, Eagan, MN Lisa Frischman-826 Wescott Square, Eagan, MN Darlene Ninteman-3463 Trails End Road, Eagan, MN Ross Cohlman-1287 Dunberry Lane, Eagan, MN After a brief welcome and Introduction by City staff of the City's representation at the informational meeting, City staff provided the neighborhood with a brief history of the City C.I.P. program, Pavement Management Program, and the City's process involved in the implementation of a project such as identified above. Mark Hanson presented the Information containing the feasibility report prepared for the improvement. All in attendance at the meeting were give a copy of the feasibility report. Following is a list of questions/concerns identified by those in attendance: The schedule presented for the improvement identifies a time frame from June 20, to August 15, 1995 as the construction period. Will It take the contractor two complete months to complete the roadway construction? The actual time the contractor is in the neighborhood may very from 12 to 15 working days, depending on weather conditions. The contractor through the specifications will be restricted to the amount of time in which the neighborhood will be disturbed for different phases of th construction. / • R-98% 612 681 4360 04-14-95 11 :07AM P003 #20 EAGAN MAINT. FAC. TEL :612-681-4360 Apr 14 95 12:05 No .007 P.04 How does the timing of Yankee Doodle Road c Incide with the timing of the prop sad Wesc ft Square Improvements? The County has scheduled the contract award for the Yankee Doodle Road Improvements for the week of April 17, 1995. The contract completion date for the Yankee Doodle Road Improvements is Mid-Nov mbar. There is an early incentive completion date clause for the contractor if he completes all work on Yankee Doodle Road prior to October 15, 1995. Due to the median construction along Yankee Doodle Road at the Wescott Square intersection, are additional improvements required to the Intersection of Ivy Lane with Yankee Doodle Road? No additional improvements to Ivy Lane are required or anticipated due to the closing of the Wescott Square intersection with the Yankee Doodle Road median construction. Is signalization along Yankee Doodle Road planned for it's intersection with Ivy LanelMike Collins Drive and Elrene Road? Signalization of the above referenced intersections is not included with the Yankee Doodle Road upgrade. Because warrants for signal installation were not met at this time. If and when warrants are met, signalization . will be constructed. Why are properties which have driveway access to Trails End Road included in the area assessment for, upgrade of Ivy Lane? They are included in this projects assessment because they fall within the project assessment area. Staff will verify the application of the City's Special Assessment Policy to verify conformance with said policy. Why are the units which take access to Wescott Trail Included In an area assessment for the upgrade of Wescott Square when those units do not have property adjacent to Wescott Square or Ivy Lane? Those units were included in the area assessment for Wescott Square and Ivy Lane because Wescott Square and Ivy Lane provide public street access to the Wescott Trail area. They are provided with a 50% credit because they do not have direct driveway access onto Wescott Square or Ivy Lane. The residents of Block 2 of Wescott Square identified drainage problems associated with their building construction. City staff will review the development plans for the Wescott Square additions to check conformance with the grading and drainage plans submitted as a part of the development. The meeting adjourned at approximately 7:45 P.M. (/i6e-4:24X- ( f• Assistant City Engineer • R-97% 12 681 4360 04-14-95 11 :07AM P004 #20 Agenda Information Memo April iS,1995 C. PROJECT 661R, SIBLEY TERMINAL INDUSTRIAL PK FINAL ASSMT ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: To dose the public hearing and authorize certification of the final assessment roll as revised. FACTS: • Approved project 661R at the public hearing held on July 5, 1994. • The project was bid and constructed under City Contract 94-02. • The City Council received the final assessment roll on March 21, 1995, and scheduled the final assessment public hearing for April 18, 1995. • All legal notices were published in the City's legal newspaper and Notice of Public Hearing mailed to all affected property owners. • An informational meeting was held on April 3, 1995, at 3:30 p.m.in the Municipal Center Council Chambers. • One property owner(Apollo Elevator at 3245 Sibley Memorial Highway)was in attendance at the informational meeting. - The property owner stated Parcels 032-02 and 033-02 do not have access to Terminal Drive;their public street access is State Trunk Highway#I3. - Staff recommends that the final assessment roll as presented be revised to exclude assessments to Parcel 033-02 and 032-02. ISSUES: • No issues have been identified to date other than the elimination of the two previously mentioned parcels which have access to State Trunk Highway 13 only. ATTACHMENTS: • The final assessment hearing summary. f2 /z • Exhibit showing the assessment area.44 ' C31° • FINAL ASSESSMENT NEARING PROJECT NUMBER: 661R ASSESSMENT HEARING DATE: April 18, 1995 SUBDIVISION/AREA: Sibley:TerminalLca PUBLIC HEARING DATE: July 5, 1994 Industrial Park IKPROVEMENTS INSTALLED AND/OR ASSESSED: F.B. ■ Feasibility Report FINAL F.R. FINAL F.R. SANITARY SEWER RATES RATES STORM SEVER . RATES RATES ❑Trunk 0 Trunk ' ❑Laterals ❑ Laterals • [' Service ❑ Lat. Benefit/ Trunk [' lat. Benefit/ Trunk WATER STREETS ❑Trunk ❑ Gravel Base $10.57/f.f. $17.44/f.f. ['Laterals El Surfacing $134.30/Acre $215.16/Acre ❑Service ❑ Res.' Equiv. Lat. Benefit/ ❑ Multi Equiv. Trunk ❑ C/I Equiv. ❑WAC ❑ Trail SERVICES STREET LIGHTS ❑ Water & San. Sever ❑ Installation ❑ Energy Charge CONTRACT 0 OF INTEREST AMOUNT CITY NO. PARCELS TERMS RATE ASSESSED FINANCED $67,607 F.R. 0 F.R. 94-02 38 10 Yrs. 6.5 % $41,494.25 0 COMMENT S• • • • 1a ( -�,1 5 / ` . 1 2 / • .9\ l , / ,11,/;. • / / ,i0 / / , :�0 � /, // •..4i,. // // P*1' . 4., . , • / �. -44s.... , t ceet4 e-#. ' 4 -4K: f /..wv . : ,4,4, ..i4-. , . le / . deitt A.4...-__,w, / / e_%T�r 1•. ,r.' y� ♦: tea' / / �tr �s -3if. �.�� 1 0 ' _ 012-75 3 —__ '4\ jft ,i fs : . e- i r? 4e, / -, --4-';'‘-7,7' LEGEND ••••• FRONTAGE .ASSESSED Q %/. AREAS ASSESSED AREAS NOT ASSESSEE MN NOT IN ROLL MILL & OVERLAY PROJECT 661—R CITY OF EAGAN ASSESSMENT BASIS AND IMPROVEMENT ARE 270 Agenda Information Memo April 18, 1995 D. PROJECT 645.BLACKHAWK HILLS ADDN STREET RECONSTRUCTION ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: • To close the public hearing and approve/deny City Project No. 645,Blackhawk Hills Addition • Street Reconstruction. • To authorize the preparation of property benefit appraisals. • To authorize the preparation of detailed plans and specifications for the above-referenced improvement. FACTS: • The proposed above-referenced improvement is identified in the City's current 5-Year Capital Improvement for consideration in 1995. • The City Council received the feasibility report on March 21, 1995, and scheduled a public hearing for April 18, 1995. • The Council received the feasibility report and scheduled a public hearing for April 18, 1995. • All legal notices pertaining to this public hearing were published in the legal newspaper as well as notification mailed to all affected property owners. • An informational meeting was held on April 10, 1995, at 6:30 p.m. ISSUES: • The residents in attendance at the informational meeting identified the following concerns: - The extent and type of roadway improvement proposed because they perceive that certain segments of the roadway are in better condition than others. - Can the project be delayed due to current listing of homes for sale in the neighborhood? - Additional catch basin installation in areas where storm sewer placement appears to be inadequate. - The feasibility of the intersection of Blackhawk Hills Road and Blackhawk Cove existing 90°turn be modified to include a curvilinear alignment with a"eyebrow" constructed on the northerly side of the curb. - Can the roadway be narrowed to deter potential"for thru-traffic? - Can the installation of a sidewalk be considered as a part of the improvement? - Sprinkler systems adjacent to the curb replacement areas. - Impact of the future I-35E Freeway crossing at Duckwood Drive. - Installation of a 3-way stop condition at the intersection of Ashbury Road and Birchpond Road. - Responses to all of the above issues are provided in the attached minutes from the informational meeting. ATTACHMENTS: • Engineering feasibility report. P 1101. • Minutes from informational meeting. p, ( 4 C( /S 3 _ _ 1 11 r/ • Igo city of cacjan Report for Blackhawk Hills Street Reconstruction • City Project No. 645 Eagan, Minnesota April 1995 • File No.• 49536 - _ Bonestroo Rosene yinAnderiik cb Associates Engineers &Architects St.Paul, Minn seta /C)? Ti ti Bonestroo,Rosene,Anderlik and Associates,Inc.is an Affirmative Actlon/Equal Opportunity Employer BonestrooOtto G.Bonestroo,P.E. Howard A.Sanford.P.E. Michael C.Lynch,P.E. Gary D.Krlstolltz,P.E. Robert W.Rosene,P.E.• Keith A.Gordon..P.E. • James R.Maland,P.E. Brian K.Gage.P.E. Rosene Joseph C.Anderlik,P.E. Robert R.Pfefferie,P.E. Jerry D.Pertzsch,P.E. Keith R.Yapp,P.E. Anderlik & Marvin I..Sorvala.P.E. Richard W.Foster.P.E. Frederic J.Stenborg,RE. Douglas J.Benoit,RE. Richard E.Turner,P.E. David O.Loskota,P.E. Scott J.Arganek.P.E. Shawn D.Gustafson,P.E. Glenn R.Cook.P.E. Robert C.Russek,A.I.A. Kenneth P.Anderson,P.E. Cecilia 011vler,P.E. Mark R.Rolls,RE. Paul G.Heuer.RE. Associates Robert G.Schunicht.RE. Mark Hanson,P.E. Mark Selp,P.E. John P.Gorden RE, Susan M.Eberiln,C.P.A. Michael T.Rautmann,P.E. Gary W.Morten,P.E. Dan D.Boyum,P.E. Engineers&Architects •Senior Consultant Ted K.Field.P.E. Paul J.Gannon.A.I.A. Jeffrey J.Ehleringer,P.E. Thomas R.Anderson,A.I.A. Daniel J.Edgerton,P.E. Lee M.Mann,P.E. Donald C.Burgardt.P.E. A.Rick Schmidt.P.E. Charles A.Erickson Thomas A.Syfko,P.E. Philip J.Caswell.P.E. Leo M.Pawelsky Frederic J.Stenborg,P.E. Mark D.Wallis.P.E. Harlan M.Olson Ismael Martinez.P.E. Mlles B.Jensen,P.E. Agnes M.Ring March 16, 1995 Michael P.Rau,P.E. L.Phillip Gravel,P.E. James F.Engelhardt Thomas W.Peterson,P.E. Karen L.Wiemeri,P.E. Honorable Mayor&Council City of Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan,MN 55122 Re: Blackhawk Hills Street Reconstruction Project No. 645 File 49536 Dear Mayor and Council: Attached is our report for Blackhawk Hills, Street Reconstruction, Project 645. This report discusses the proposed street reconstruction and presents cost estimates for these improvements. Also,included is the estimated assessment rate per parcel. We will be pleased to meet with the City Council and other interested parties to discuss this report ,at a mutually convenient time. Yours very truly, BONESTROO, SENE,ANDERLIK&ASSOCIATES,INC. Mar A.Ranson I hereby certify that this report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Registered Professional Engineer under the laws of the S e of inn ta. • R wed by: , Lt / Mark A. Hanson E.gan Public Wor• P ept. Date: March 16. 1995 Reg. No. 14260 Date: /4.5' '�� a Reviewed b Y 1,4 0 - Finance Department 49536.rpt Date: 3 i " q S / c9� 2335 West Highway 36 • St. I,�, & i-5-51i3 • 612-636-4600 h I • Table of Contents LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL 1 INTRODUCTION 3 SCOPE 4 FEASIBILITY AND RECOMMENDATIONS 5 STREET EVALUATION 6 DISCUSSION 7 Street Improvement 7 Storm Sewer Improvements 7 Water Main Repair 7 Street Lights 8 COST ESTIMATE 9 AREA TO BE INCLUDED 10 ASSESSMENT 11 REVENUE 12 PROJECT SCHEDULE 13 APPENDIX A-PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE 14 APPENDIX B -PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL 17 APPENDIX C-POWER AUGER BORINGS BY BRAUN INTERTEC /C '? (10' r q ' Introduction The City of Eagan, similar to other communities,is responsible for providing utilities and streets to serve existing and new developments. The City officials and its Public Works Department are also responsible for maintaining these facilities in the most efficient manner possible for the least amount of cost. Typically,utilities have a design life of 40 to 80 years while streets have a design life of 25 to 30 years. The design life for streets is considerably less due to the nature of the materials that are used to build them,the weather they're exposed to and the amount of traffic that they experience. It's also important that all property owners and City officials know and are confident that streets like those in the Blackhawk Hills area are being maintained at a reasonable cost for the longest period of time. In an attempt to better inform property owners of the condition of their streets, the City of Eagan recently did surface evaluations for this area as part of its Pavement Management Program. The results of the surface evaluations are presented in this report to help property owners better understand the condition of their street. These evaluations are based on technical and objective observations made by representatives trained in this work. The local streets in the Blackhawk Hills area were constructed beginning in 1974. In 1988,the streets in this area were seal coated as part of Eagan's ongoing seal coat program. The City of Eagan routinely seal coats its local streets every 5 to 7 years. Although the streets in this area are just . beginning to approach the end of their useful design life,to construct a seal coat at this time is not cost effective,based on their present condition. Streets deteriorate at different rates based on a variety of reasons. It's felt the streets in this area have begun to deteriorate due to a poor road cross section, resulting in poor drainage and failures in the subbase and asphalt surface. Although more frequent crack sealing and seal coat applications may have extended the useful life of these streets,it's difficult for the City to spend more maintenance dollars on some streets than others. It's expected,based on . Eagan's ongoing street maintenance program that's in place now,the street reconstruction proposed herein will extend the useful life of these streets another 25-30 years. 49536.rpt 3 ( . r fl • • Scope This project provides for reconstructing the streets in the Blackhawk Hills area as shown on Figure No. 1. The Blackhawk Hills area includes large single family lots with an average street frontage of 130'per lot. The streets in the Blackhawk Hills area are all local streets constructed to a residential • design section. The Blackhawk Hills area is located immediately north of the Blackhawk Lake. The streets included in this project are shown on Figure No.2 and are listed below: Blackhawk Hills Road(East of Ashbury Road) 1135 Lin.ft. Blackhawk Cove -1260 Lin. ft. Blackhawk Point 310 Lin.ft. Birch Pond Road(South of Ashbury Road) 1475 Lin.ft. Birch Pond Place 450 Lin.ft. TOTAL 4630 Lin. ft. • 49536.rpt 4 /02 d • t • t I __,_..41k r T � �—� ;, , ��■ % / • !� �v , ---, 1 A. /,' •Isk. / / y r `., `•j N. !f, ,f O 'ATION { e r �" —r; <! _• 4 .,It\ _ / _ -fit► . _ i !i- .If� _ �- ..././ 'xr"` '�f�'f —i_1 iT I ; 7' 1 `ILAnfainne I.� J v---1...--..4 'Fr; .' ri'-- 3,;_ik. $70.,.. , 1.4.41g § 1. \(,,,50/ i / i' 1 ` 'ice ......, p GI rl'.;.�� ��, ' .,,;:.•��/f1iOU ^�'- ° C`{+,�.��.,� 11 rT / c rC1c G—'•~a Ito t f,,,, +.'-.a— 1 \ ct w. -•{j•�i'r'�i 1 =.t`�'-J�: 'C"' (< 4-17-el ��i-4 2 ■ '! "Ci^t!, I1 '=—^.1 trE_...4'1... d 1..L. .rr •/��,:\i . ;<Ct: •'•Yt t�:'1�.-r„!X1 1i•. 1 r tr1..,E. S 1' .`tI ggg...---=1•`• ,A,..44- „..,_, .�y�-0611 "':a`• ' -- r`�r y�i--. (!1 t ,� rl C{' M•'~ ' .. I r'•tT!S i-, 1 :_, a t . C Ems_ 1 / `aTI �,r-,,...� �c� E•�...>��T-r-r-1 t s� I I \ 't''t I�I i + f n..%/ ,1 iC i 1 i ' ' ,.x i , I Rao rc d fir~' I i—� .`. ,,,, , _I _ • 1 0 •,11,% .. ' ' . I •'•••••••••,,' 'le : i iliil .."-71 +SO -44/1 ....;71 , _ 0„, ROW �^'t^•1 t 1 I ! — _ — _ r'- ——= —- . . : , N 0 1000 2000 Scote in rat LOCATION PLAN Bonestroo Rosene IN iri EAGAN, MINNESOTA FIGURE 1 Anderlik 6 BLACKHAWK HILLS STREET RECONSTRUCTION Associates CITY PROJ. No. 645 L:\49\49536\49536FQ1 APRIL 1995 Co M. 49536 I . 1 i 1 1---71.-��L ,...�•� r / --. ; i ` f j t r-- ''+1 Imo` /^�'.. `'!�i � `�� ~''ice._ f r '∎, LL 1 ASHBURY ROAD f /~ t i 1 ! t I r j� 1 �I.. r 29 . 28 A. 27 ,i 26 I 25, 24 . ``l �.;/ /. ■ r f ` '•\_ BLACfd'HAVIf'K GLEN / '`"'r. ''- / \ I 1 i \ ..- '�--�. ' --1 1 / 1 2 0; % 2N030 DDI TION ,% ti — ` ,1 ` — `? 1\I `' ' `�1R1LLS /-�C ,4 `\ BLACKHAW 7� / ` \ , \ f° `� ' i -... !f i 10 `/O i.- ( e : .� � idA% 1ST ADD -' �' -y-. � .i i Q / `� ---, V. ^ ' 5 \.'`� .8 ,C---"',,N '/ / 1� N'''.:'...\., 7 . . • ` � ,—.....c. \ 42ND/ADd/T/O N; : c ,, , , 7 —` I— / / 7/01 4 5 f` `�.`\�. �/ 5 ! 4 i--2 j I 1 i O ..ale I �QN h. ___t�111S 3 ! anan ;1 ��` 'r !HILL i0 /-*/ �� 1 i 17 N` `•/ / \ ... • r-\?0,ci<11.r , 16 i \ 3 1 1 3 I .." ,--- \ ; --.'-W I7LACK144 N 14 r \, [ ,,, \ ..„------ ,-\7". 9 G� ,L Ie 13 . \—ASSESSMENT 03 1"--s-,...! s 12 H AREA r-� s , j'° j<# ''oQl10 L..,` L 7 8 9 .., • BLACKHAWK .LAKE�"�a`��--1 /4 09 / 10 1 11 ! 12 I 13 ;14 > ;'% LEGEND { Qi s t, p Overlay Existing 1 X00 'O0 I ' II Bituminous Surface Sea.in list I \---- I Remove Existing I Bituminous Surface STREET IMPROVEMENTS fas o nestroo Rosen Anderlik & EAGAN, MINNESOTA FIGURE 2 11 Associates BLACKHAWK HILL STREET RECONSTRUCTION CITY PROJ. No. 645 L•\49\49536\49536F03 APRIL 1995 COM . 95336 • Feasibility and Recommendations • - . . This project is feasible from an engineering standpoint and is in accordance with the Master Street Plans for the City of Eagan. The project can best be carried out as one contract. • • • 49536apt 5 13 ( Street Evaluation The City of Eagan with the assistance of Braun Intertec has developed a Pavement Management Program. This program allows the City to evaluate the condition of the existing street surface to program timely maintenance. The Pavement Condition Index (PCI) ranks the surface condition. Table 1 presents the categories which define PCI Rankings. TABLE 1 PCI Recommended Improvement 55-100 Routine(Crack Seal/Seal Coat) 35-55 Patch/Repair and/or Overlay 0-35 Reconstruct PCI rankings in the Blackhawk Hills area range falls within the "Reconstruct" category. Reviewing the street condition and the power auger borings presented in Appendix C, the most effective maintenance program for most of the streets in this area is to remove the existing bituminous surface, upgrade the existing road cross section/gravel base to improve drainage, and construct a new bituminous surface. On Birch Pond Place, where the PCI rankings fall within the '"Patch/Repair and/or Overlay"category,the existing bituminous surface will be milled at the concrete gutter and a bituminous overlay will be constructed over the existing bituminous surface. • 49536apt 6 5a • Discussion Street Improvement The proposed street improvements for the Blackhawk Hills area include removing the existing • bituminous surface as shown on Figure No. 3. In those areas where the existing bituminous surface is removed,test rolling,reshaping,and upgrading the existing subbase surface will be done before the bituminous surface is constructed. A new 3"thick bituminous surface will be constructed in two lifts after the improved subbase surface is completed. Also presented as a street reconstruction option is the reclamation of the existing bituminous surface and gravel base for use as aggregate base before a new 3" thick bituminous surface is placed. The reclamation process involves mixing and processing the existing bituminous surface and underlying aggregate base to create the needed aggregate base. It is expected if the reclaimed bituminous surface option is constructed, a 5%-10% cost savings may result over completely removing the existing bituminous surface and constructing a new 3" thick aggregate base surface. On Birch Pond Place,the existing bituminous surface will be milled adjacent to the existing curb to allow a bituminous overlay to be constructed over the existing bituminous surface and match the existing concrete gutter. Crack sealing and patching may be required on Birch Pond Place. It's estimated approximately 11%of the existing concrete curbs will be removed and reconstructed. Storm Sewer Improvements One catch basin.is proposed to be added in the intersection of Blackhawk Hills Road and Blackhawk . Cove, as shown_on,i~igure No. 4. Repairs of the existing catchbasins will be made as required. . . . Draintile.and fabric,construction may be warranted in certain areas. These areas will be identified. during plan and specification preparation. . . Water Main Repair The existing sanitary sewer and water main serving this area was reviewed by Public Works. It's recommended changes be made to the existing water system at Blackhawk Hills Road and Blackhawk • 49536.rpt 7 C. 5 • . • 34' B—B EXISTING MOUNTABLE CONCRETE . ----------- [ i t { C & G fig Ex. Bituminous Surface . *Remove Ex. Bituminous Surface (2" -3 1/2" Thick) 1" Type 41 Bituminous Wear Course 2" Type 31 Bituminous Base Course Ex. Aggregate Base(6"—12" Thick) 1" Minimum Cl. 5 Aggregate Base/ Reclamation material (For leveling, correct subbase/ subgrade as required.) *Remove/Reconstruct Concrete • EXISTING SECTION Curb as required. PROPOSED SECTION REMOVE Ex. BIT. SURFACE MiII Bituminous Surfc ll 7' \ -----r-------------------- - --------t__---_ ____ __ r Ex. Bituminous Surface 1 1/2 —2 Type 41 (2" —3 1/2" Thick) Bituminous Overlay Ex. Aggregate Base(6"—12" Thick) EXISTING SECTION PROPOSED SECTION:- . . Birch Pond Place - , OVERLAY Ex. BIT. SURFACE • TYPICAL SECTIONS eon stroo Rosene NB EAGAN, MINNESOTA NEI And rlik& FIGURE 3 Associates BLACKHAWK HILLS STREET RECONSTRUCTION CITY PROD. No. 645 Engine rsa Architect, 2335 West MOM/ay 36 L:\49\49536\49536E04 APRIL 1995 COMM. 495 6 S. Paul. Minnesota 55113 ( 3 7 , 1 i -•` % I } , , , . �,� , � i 1 +..1......L. n __ _ .� BURY ROAD '� I ! I. ,r I r r . I I I ; 111} 1 ti � 1 � � t1. , \\ 228V26 t 25 24 I r�--.. -��, ,` /\ i f I QLACKHAI ,K Gt EN i ! • �/' '\. 4 ;=�! '�+'-, �NNI\NNNN„1„H / 1 / \- _'""1 2 1`•. :VII). 2ND ADDITION 1 . ` Yf C- I I i`t. `' ti ' N. ! 1 h ` ---� 4 3 ���� � �BL4CKHAW�L�I�h.,! �k` � .Jj-�".�(Jt `, i 1 o 1..QL�1� KH,4 /L 2S ;,,\ i t_ \,/ , \// 1 3/fir-, 10 _ ' �` 1 , ' 1 T s 0 ` o � 9 i /� I , 4 ON 4 t 'l j r ,t----� _ -- -- g�G ,�,\1 S ADS ,i_i 6 . .' P<r4rr . '''s \ • . *.iipi\-1qPQ'S _ %,1 .•- \. ' . . I dE 7 %! \ i „:7-- .,A ,,..-- . / . . i ..., \ ,(\ i ND ADDITION?�. ED �\ \�� . ! „ i 1 , \/) -J_._. o s PROPOSED :---1 1 ,� CATCHBASIN, s 4 a / 1 �` ///04-.°.. ipG :. 1 L' 6 I Rnen \ - .7\\\ ,!,•( 4 ` O u{,�1 6 ;• /' �� rTHI N 1 .1- „ ./ Nc` `-.-3 g i✓/• \ 3 f0 f//;. �� 8 _ 1 16 ;* .NN `' " CKNAvK I f' , •� 2 i.1 2 16 1 1 i 1 , ! 3 iof 3 , , I •1‘4‘.\ s z h(,�4 ,1 • 13 /s 5 5 12 I ASSESSMENT /" 0 i • AREA -� 10 6 0i OM T , 11 110 • / BL4CKHAWK L4KE 8 �r� 0 16\ 17t _ . ` I f/ � J I J �= \ g ;/ 1p ! 11 12 . 13 14`1i''��y 7.'7.4_1 - -_ . - 4 N. ..__ o � I Scow in het • • fil Bon stroo UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS Roe n 0 And rick & EAGAN, MINNESOTA FIGURE 4 VII Associ t a BLACKHAWK, HILL STREET RECONSTRUCTION CITY PROJ. No. 645 L:\49\49536\49536E05 APRIL 1995 COMM. 49538„.....---- c3 • Cove, as shown on Figure No. 4. The changes will include removing an existing tee and replacing it with a 90° bend. Street Lights No improvements are proposed to the existing street lights in Blackhawk Hills. Improvements would be considered if requested by the benefitted property owners. 49536spt ( c",3 Cost Estimate A preliminary cost estimate is presented in Appendix A at the back of this report which is summarized below: • I. Street: New Reclaimed Aggregate Aggregate Option Option a) Bituminous Street Reconstruction $141,190 $124,965 b) Repair Existing Concrete Curb 23,465 23,465 II. Water Main Repair 5,050 5,050 III. Storm Sewer 7.650 7.650 TOTAL $177,355 $161,130 The total estimated project cost for new aggregate base and reclaimed aggregate base includes contingencies and indirect costs with the exception of street lights. Contingency costs are estimated at 10%, while indirect costs are estimated at 35%, which include legal,engineering,administration, and bond interest. • 49536.pt 9 (31 6 Area to Be Included The area to be included for assessment purposes is presented on Figure No. 2 and is listed below: Parcel Description ' No. of Lots Blackhawk Hills Addition Lot 1-10 Block 1 10 Blackhawk Hills 2nd Addition Lot 1-8 Block 1 8 Lot 1-7 Block 2 7 Blackhawk Glen 1st Addition Lot 4-10 Block 3 7 Blackhawk Glen 2nd Addition Lot 30 Block 3 1 Rose Hill Addition Lot 9 Block 1 1 Total 34 49536.rpt 10 I � • Assessment Assessments are proposed to be levied against the benefitted property in accordance with the City of Eagan's Assessment Policy for Street Reconstruction which is summarized below. A preliminary assessment roll is included in Appendix B located at the back of this report. All costs will be revised based on final project costs. Residential/Duplex Assessed • Civ, • Bituminous street reconstruction 75% 25% Repair existing concrete curb 0% 100% Water repair 0% 100% Storm sewer 0% 100% It's proposed to assess the benefitting property on a per lot basis, in accordance with Eagan's Assessment Policy for street reconstruction. It's proposed to assess residential property 75% of the project cost for the bituminous street reconstruction. Listed below is the estimated assessment rate per lot based on the project cost for new aggregate base. Cost/Lot Blackhawk Hills Street Reconstruct $3,115 • The homeowner will have the option at the time of the assessment hearing to pay the assessment in full following the assessment hearing or include the assessment as part of their property tax statement. If the assessment is included on their property tax statement, the assessment will be spread over a ._, : ,„period of time and.at an,interest rate determined by the City Council. If the assessment is spread over • •..- a 15-year period at an 8.5%interest rate,the following payment schedule will result: Estimated Assessment=$3,150 • Principal/ Interest/ Cost/ Cost/ Year Year Year Month • 1st Year $210 $268 $478 $40 15th Year $210 ° $ 18 $228 $19 49536.rpt 11 • , • • • Revenue A summary of revenue sources is listed below: Project Cost Revenue - Balance - Blackhawk Hills Street Reconstruction $141,190 $105,910 -$35,280 Blackhawk Hills Repair Ex.Curb 23,465 0 -23,465 Water Main Repair 5,050 0 - 5,050 Storm Sewer 7.650 0 - 7.650 TOTAL $177,355 $105,910 -$71,445 The estimated project deficit is $71,445, which will be the responsibility of the Major Street and Utility Fund. - - - - - - -- -- ---- - ------- - - - - - - --- ---- - 49536spt IV, 0 Project Schedule Present Feasibility Report March 21, 1995 Public Hearing April 18, 1995 Approve Plans&Specifications May 16, 1995 Award Contract June 20, 1995 Substantial Completion September 1, 1995. Assessment Hearing October 1995 First Payment Due w/Property Tax Statement May 1996 • 49536spt 13 ( 4k( APPENDIX A • PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE BLACKHAWK HILLS STREET RECONSTRUCTION CITY PROJECT NO 645 . Street ' A) Bituminous Street Reconstruction 1) New Aggregate Option 12,300 SY Remove existing bituminous pavement @ $2.25/sy = $27,675 700 SY Mill bituminous surface at curb @ $2.00/sy 1,400 700 TN Class 5 aggregate base w/excavation @ $8.50/ton 5,950 1,450 TN Bituminous base course @ $13.00/ton 18,850 850 TN Bituminous wear course @ $14.00/ton 11,900 140 TN Bituminous material for mixture @ $30.00/ton 18,200 750 GL Bituminous material for tack coat @ $1.60/gal. 1,200 3- EA Reconstruct existing CB @ $500.00/ea. 1,500 7 EA Furnish and install new cstg. @ $200/ea 1,400 20 EA Adjust MH/GV structure @ $150.00/ea 3,000 LS Traffic control @ $2,000.00/1s 2,000 100' MG Water @ $20.00/mg 2.000 Subtotal $ 95,075 _ +10%Contingencies 9.510 $104,585 +35%Indirect Cost 36.605 =,.; TOTAL $141,190 • 49536.rpt 14 tiL0,2 l • a 2) Reclaimed Aggregate Base Option 12,300 SY Reclamation of bituminous surface @ $2.00/sy $24,600 - 700 SY Subbase preparation @ $1.00/sy 700 1,450 TN Bituminous base course @ $13.00/ton 18,850 850 TN Bituminous wear course @ $14.00/ton 11,900 140 TN Bituminous material for mixture @ $30.00/ton 18,200 750 GL Bituminous material for tack coat @ $1.60/gal. 1,200 3 EA Reconstruct existing CB @ $500.00/ea. 1,500 7 EA Furnish and install new cstg. @ $200/ea 1,400 20 EA Adjust MH/GV structure @ $150.00/ea 3,000 LS Traffic control @ $2,000.00/1s 2,000 100 MG Water @ $20.00/mg 2.000 Subtotal $ 84,150 +10% Contingencies 8.415 $ 92,565 +35%Indirect Cost 32.400 TOTAL $124,965 49536spt 15 43 • a B) Repair Existing Concrete Curb 1,000 LF Remove concrete curb and gutter @ $2.50/1f $2,500 1,000 LF• Concrete curb and gutter @ $8.00/1f 8,000 300 SY Driveway repair @ $11.00/sy 3,300 1,000 SY Sod @ $2.00/sy 2.000 Subtotal $ 15,800 +10% Contingencies 1.580 $ 17,380 +35%Indirect Cost 6.085 TOTAL • _ . . _.. $23,465 II. Water Main Repair 1 LS Remove existing 8"tee,replace w/90° Bend @ $3,400.00 $3,400 +10% Contingencies 340 $3,740 +35%Indirect Cost 1.310 TOTAL $5,050 III. Storm Sewer 1 EA Std.CB w/cstg @ $1,200.00/ea $1,200 • 30 LF .15" storm sewer pipe @ $30.00/1f - 900 200 LF 4" drain tile @ $10.00/1f 2,000 700 SY Geotextile fabric @ $1.50/sy 1.050 Subtotal $5,150 ' +10% Contingencies 515 . $5,665 +35%Indirect Cost 1.985 TOTAL $7,650 49536.rpt /16 . • APPENDIX B PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL BLACKHAWK HILLS • STREET RECONSTRUCTION CITY PROJECT NO 645 • • Parcel Street Description No. of Lots Cost/Lot Total Blackhawk Hills Addition Lot 1-10 Block 1 10 $3,115(1) $31,150 Blackhawk Hills 2nd Addition Lot 1-8 Block 1 8 3,115 24,920 Lot 1-7 Block 2 7 3,115 21,805 Blackhawk Glen 1st Addition Lot 4-10 Block 3 7 3,115 21,805 Blackhawk Glen 2nd Addition Lot 30 Block 3 1 3,115 3,115 Rose Hill Addition Lot 9 Block 1 1 3,115 3.115 TOTAL-,; 34 $105,910 (1) Street Cost/Lot=$141,190 x 0.75_34 Lots=$3,115. 49536.rpt 17 si4 Braun Intertec Engineering,Inc. 6950 West 146th Street,Suite 131 Apple Volley,Minnesota 55124.8520 I N T •RT E C 612-431.14193 Fox:431-3084 Engineers and Scientists Serving the Built and Natural Environments January 8, 1993 Project BODX-92-286 • • Mr. Stan Lexvold f-_f/—l3 . City of Eagan • 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55121 • Dear Mr. Lexvold: Re: Power Auger Boeings, Black Hawk Hills Road,-Black Hawk Point and Black Hawk- Cove, City Project Number 645, Eagan, Minnesota As you authorized on December 3, 1992, we have completed the power auger borings at the above referenced streets. The purpose of the power augerborings was to provide pavement and subgrade soil information for the proposed street improvements. Procedures ,The power auger borings were performed on December 8, 1992, with a truck-mounted drill rig. The borings were conducted in general accordance with ASTM D 1452, " Soil Investigation and Sampling by Auger Boring." The soil classifications and strata depths were inferred from cuttings brought to the surface by rotation of the auger. Cuttihgs'from the desired sample depths were placed in jars. The borings were backfilled and the bituminous patched. Soils encountered in the borings were visually and manually classified in the field by the crew chief in accordance with ASTM D 2487, "Classification of Soils for Engineering Purposes," and ASTM D 2488, "Description and Identification of Soils (Visual-Manual Procedures)." A summary of ASTM D 2487 is attached. All samples were then returned to our laboratory for review of the field classifications by a geotechnical engineer. Representative samples will remain in our office for a period of 60'days to be available for your examination. Results ..., •_..,.:_-The attached tabulation indicates the approximate location and corresponding number'(1 _., . .- through 7) of each boring performed. The boring locations were indicated on the site plan you -- v.• • • •provided us. The tabulation provides the bituminous thickness, aggregate base thickness and .. the subgrade soil type. It should be noted that the aggregate'base consists of sand'and gravel- -that is similar to the subgrade soils at most boring locations, and the aggregate base • thicknesses should be considered'approximate. • • • _ (14 (0 � City of Eagan Project BODX-92-286 • January 8, 1993 • Page 2 General Services performed by the geotechnical and material engineers for this project have been conducted with that level of care and skill ordinarily exercised by members of the profession • currently practicing in this area. No warranty, expressed or implied, is made. If you have any questions regarding the information contained in this letter, please call Dave Youngstrom or John Carlson.t (6I2) 431-4493. Sincerely, • David T. Youngs Engineering Assis t Professional Certification: I hereby certify that this report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Registered Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. 1141M4 kiklfrn ; • - John T. Carlson. P.E. • - Project Engineer - Registration Number: 20663 - • • . Date: January 8, 1993 Attachment-. Tabulation of Power Auger Boring Results • dtv#jtc:pa•19•�_E6Utr • ( 7 _ , w 11 • Power Auger Boring Results Black Hawk Hills Road, Black Hawk Point and Black Hawk Cove City Project Number 645 - . .. . -- Aggregate Base Approximate Bituminous (sand and gravel) Number Location Thickness thickness Subgrade Soil Description 1 Station 1+50, 21/2 inches 12 inches SC-SM: Silty Clayey Sand, tine- Black Hawk Hills to medium;grained, with a trace • Road. Left Lane' of Gravel, brown. moist. 2 Station 1+50, 2 inches 10 inches SM: Silty Sand, tine- to medium- Black Hawk Point, grained, with a trace of Gravel, Right Lane brown, moist. 3 Station 3+00, 31/2 inches 12 inches SM: Silty Sand, tine- to medium- Black Hawk Hills - grained, with a trace of Gravel, Road, Left Lane i brown, moist. • 4 •Station 6+50. 3 inches 9 inches SC-SM: Silty Clayey Sand, tine- , Black Hawk Hills to medium-grained, with a trace Road, Right Lane of Gravel, brown, moist. 5 Station 2+50, 2'% inches 7 inches SM: Silty Sand, tine- to medium- Black Hawk Cove, grained, with a trace of Gravel, • Right Lane brown, moist. • 6 Station 7+50, 21/2 inches 3 inches SM: Silty Sand, tine- to medium- Black Hawk Cove, grained, with a trace of Gravel, __ . ... . ....- Left Lane brown, moist. • 7 Station 11+00. 214 inches 6 inches SC-SM: Silty Clayey Sand. tine- Black Hawk Cove, to medium-grained. with a trace _ . _Right Lane of Gravel, brown, moist. 91.23apavemcat • • 1 tt It , 4 rit ii711'° 11 MEMO __city of eagan TO: FILE FROM: MIKE FOERTSCH,ASSISTANT CITY ENGINEER DATE: APRIL 13, 1995 SUBJECT: PROJECT NO. 645, BLACKHAWK HILLS ADDN STREET RECONSTRUCTION PUBLIC INFORMATIONAL MEETING SUMMARY An informational neighborhood meeting was held at 6:30 p.m. on Monday, April 10, 1995, at the Eagan Municipal Center to discuss the proposed improvements as referenced above. In attendance at the meeting were the following: Eagan City Staff Members: Mike Foertsch, Arnie Erhart, Wayne Schwanz & Stan Lexvold. BRAA Consulting Engineers: John Gorder &Craig Larson Property Owners: Please refer to attached list and exhibit showing property owners' location within the proposed improvement area. After a brief introduction by City staff of all those representing the City in attendance at the informational meeting, City staff provided the neighborhood with a brief history of the City's CIP Program,the Pavement Management Program, review of the existing utility system, and the City's process involved in the implementation of a project such as identified above. John Gorder, from BRAA, provided a presentation on the details of the feasibility report prepared for the improvement. Following is a listing of the questions as asked by the residents and the response given by representatives from City staff: QUESTION: How long will residents be out of service during water main repair? RESPONSE: Water main might be shut down for a maximum of 8 hours. 8-4 P.M. QUESTION: Curb replacement, how is it determined and contractor responsibility? RESPONSE: Replace areas structural deficiency only-contractor is responsible for their breakage due to his negligence. QUESTION: Man hole cover adjustment? RESPONSE: New man holes are adjusted to approximately 3/8". - 1/2" below blacktop grade. QUESTION: New Catch Basin? RESPONSE: New Catch Basin will be properly placed to adequately pick-up drainage-additional catch basins may be installed to properly provide street drainage. QUESTION: Lot 9-could 90° bend in street be changed to half cul-de-sac? RESPONSE: There could be a slight reconfiguration of the street, dependent upon costs associated with this construction. QUESTION: Blackhawk Point-would not reconstruct cul-de-sac portion due to age of that portion? QUESTION: Birchpond Place-Mill edges and overlay only due to PCI and existing condition? QUESTION: Why wasn't overlay plan only proposed? RESPONSE: Because of existing surface conditions and PCI ratings indicate overlay would not provide expected life expectancy. Reconstruct neighborhoods as a group-proposed as a unit not in street segments. QUESTION: Birchpond Road -was this street being removed and replaced - can project be delayed? RESPONSE: Possible mill overlay-the final plan will take this into consideration - if project is not approved now there is no guarantee of future timing. QUESTION: When would the project be complete? RESPONSE: Early Fall of 1995. QUESTION: When were the street segments originally constructed? RESPONSE: 17-20 years ago. QUESTION: How did the amount of traffic come into play for the reconstruction? RESPONSE: The present traffic is not the factor because low volume of traffic. QUESTION: How many repairs does City do if the project does not go? RESPONSE: Minimal amount of patching. QUESTION: How often does City seal coat? RESPONSE: The first seal coat is generally 5 years after initial construction and then 7 years after that-seal coat would not extend the life of these streets. QUESTION: Is there a record of street repairs? RESPONSE: Repairs in the last 5 years and the seal coating year. 2 LC QUESTION: Assessments? RESPONSE: Assessments would be in October 1995 payable in 1996. QUESTION: 8.5%interest rate (estimate only)? QUESTION: How close does the assessment estimate match the final assessment? RESPONSE: City has some properties appraised - City has to pick-up total cost after appraisal amount. QUESTION: Schedule? RESPONSE: Public Hearing 4-18-95 Approval of plans - middle of May Substantial completion- Fall of 1995 QUESTION: When would project start? RESPONSE: Middle of June approximately 2 months of construction QUESTION: Sprinkler System? RESPONSE: Responsibility of home owner to remove and replace - remove only sprinkler system where curb sections are to be removed. QUESTION: Bridge at Duckwood? RESPONSE: Future improvement dependent upon development in area. QUESTION: Would the Bridge at Duckwood increase traffic? RESPONSE: Not very likely due to curvilinear alignment of roadway. Ashbury Road would be a more convenient road for Blue Cross employees. QUESTION: Is Violet Lane going to be extended? RESPONSE: It might be extended through the Lemieux property with development. QUESTION: What is the reason for the new bridge over I-35E? RESPONSE: Alleviate traffic congestion at Yankee Doodle & Pilot Knob Road intersection. QUESTION: Could project be delayed because of home for sale? RESPONSE: No, because there is always the potential for a house sale regardless of timing. QUESTION: Stop sign at Ashbury & Birchpond Road? RESPONSE: Stop signs are not for speed control - used only for right of way for traffic. City to review signage at this intersection. Meeting adjourned at approximately 8:30 P.M. Attachment: Property Owners Listing & Exhibit 3 II'' a,y yy ddIIII T'11;9�.i � • _. city of eagan CITY PROJECT NO. 645 BLACKHAWK HILLS ROAD INFORMATIONAL MEETING ATTENDANCE SHEET APRIL 10, 1995 NAME ADDRESS 1. 4 E1,r#IS /C9C garb 2. G/41 tiY "t-ci1P" _ _3_G :FS )3/Rc7y fe iv D •,, 3. //filet J 4 jj /13 ' (4bleVAlice4itif 4. 7o vv PG a/ /610 ,84c i Aat.si 5. / %74-- 3690 R.r.X.pa..,.4 A 6. -54,sQ11 )irks 367S 2,,.d .c4 7.' _Poir2CntfeettAttlletee( /G05- Ael•dhr•dt glb '8. n�r i gc a5 Qite#ReN0 ape 9. Al •M Z.:.r S a ti► r c1 t t. , G 11 1 1_14 g le t,a w to C o v E 10. C,%\vAs l e 4.S' R r hu w U �fs Q 11. yek g 6gq Bitettpevei Ra,cP 12. T�,N 12ACA o 3as //CN04A0 RD. 13. Q V145 ( ..c Pt • 14. l KS1124 i b r0 acichq_./c CaV'C 15. LroAwt 349c 3/tc,47•00 o 4,0 I (p Ire.-c4 et. cco 3C078- 1 stile" Q NetLe /7 c704, 10 71 oH1L(G- /680 Alcolet H4tJ CdvE CV-‘444-, tA-01-44 ja i . . • • . • . .! . , r-•_-1 '� H • • . . • i .. ... .. .. .• .......A ., -,71 1—,r, � r, . • .. I, - •. . ..- . . -.. - . .. :. .•. • .\- .. .. . • . • .:. . • . /� r 1----] 6,,„ .: • • .......___ : .• fi :r : . ; 25 a4 ' . •� ; l .;1 •,, �C .' q k G EN \ � f ' `/ ". ' ` : ••. 2ND Aoo�rio 30 ,""":.... .. .. i' N?' &4CK :z ; H s Oar', / . ' 10 .. ... . "...4::::t:::::$111# '. /. ja • E •. � •, ' : ..a.• - 7 ! \,\%.0.e\ I •:.:.•••••••• •••••••••••••••••••••••••$••••••%•••/ • ...1111111:.Itst'fts;;•,... P:::::•:. "•• 146 ri::::::i::::i:::::.g.r.S..:.\\\Vi• • •••••111.1.11'.._IItilt...jj:: . .\ s., . 4,.?.........c........:.*............................. 4 ../ki`%, #. j ' : ::::::#::::: ,:.n..... . 3 6411.411......... 0 . .................''l '. 1 \ • 1 - - - --‘ I- • ..,...„$.:.: .?!,../.::;.:4;::::::.... yil< 'l " ........ • / • viiiiiiiiiiiii ','•• ••• 14 i 2 .-,-.-- -,J • . . • .. 7 ' ,■' \iiiiiill 19 . . .....2.LA 1 . 4 _ _. • • ASSESSMENT 9 � t + AREA • ' i " �' / ivy I, .1 .../..v..:*:.y.::/.../.7m......."4::::::gg: lbw& ip .....---_ NEW r„ '.1.1 .1 . /. LA:KHAWK. LAKE ." a — tii....01..iik 1,711 •l,. _.. LEGEND ' 1 _.... • .• .,I . I Property Owners in Attendance at '1 I Neighborhood Meeting ,I STREET IMPROVEMENTS _,,� „ f {r�s,#roo I Ir : �� : one E4GAN� MINNESOTA FIGtyRE 2 A rlik A•BLACKHAWIK. HILL •STREET. RECONSTRUCTION gout, s CITY•PROJ. No. 645 _.... . . L`49\49538\49539r03 APRIL 199 comm. 40534 • • • • ' S3'• . . • • • • . , • . .. •..". . . ....•. .. • . . •. Agenda Information Memo April 18, 1995 Eagan City Council Meeting E. VARIANCE - PAUL J. KLEIN • ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: To approve or deny a 14' rear yard setback Variance to the required 50' setback from Pilot Knob Road for Lot 6,Block 1, Oster Addition, located at 1405 Oster Drive in the southeast quarter of Section 4. FACTS: • The right-of-way for Pilot Knob Road and the setback requirements of the City have not changed since the property was originally platted in 1982. • Given the setback requirements, the existing platted lot has a very restricted buildable area. • The adjacent lot has a home that encroaches 14' into the 50' setback area; however, there are no records indicating a Variance was ever requested or approved for this development. ISSUES: • None BACKGROUND/ATTACHMENTS: (1) Staff report - page___ PLANNING REPORT CITY OF EAGAN REPORT DATE: April 7, 1995 CASE #: 4-V-5-4-95 APPLICANT: Paul Klein HEARING DATE: April 18, 1995 PROPERTY OWNER: Dakota County PREPARED BY: Mike Ridley REQUEST: Variance LOCATION: 1405 Oster Drive COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: D-I, Single Family ZONING: Single Family, R-1 SUMMARY OF REQUEST Paul Klein is requesting approval of a 14' building setback Variance to the required 50' setback from Dakota County right-of-way for Lot 6, Block 1, Oster Addition located on the west side of Pilot Knob Road, north of Skyline Drive in the SE 1/4 of Section 4. AUTHORITY FOR REVIEW Section 11.40, Subd. 3, C., states: 1. If the Council shall determine that the special conditions applying to the structures or land in question are peculiar to such property or immediately adjoining property and do not apply generally to other land or structures in the district in which said land is located, and that the granting of the application is necessary for the applicant. 2. That granting of the proposed variance will not be contrary to the intent of this Chapter and the Comprehensive Guide Plan. 3. That granting of such variance will not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate demonstrable hardship or difficulty. BACKGROUND/HISTORY Oster Addition was subdivided and platted in 1982. This subdivision dedicated a 50' half right-of-way for Pilot Knob Road. �� J Planning Report - Klein Variance April 18, 1995 Page 2 EXISTING CONDITIONS The adjacent lot (Lot 7, Block 1, Oster Addition) south of the subject lot has an existing home that encroaches 14' into the 50' Pilot Knob Road setback; however, there are no records indicating a variance had ever been requested or approved. The subject lot is a mirror image of Lot 7 and Mr. Klein is requesting an identical encroachment. EVALUATION OF REQUEST The applicant believes that subsequent to the platting of Oster Addition, Pilot Knob Road was widened which caused setback line to shift to the west and therefore impacts the lot in a negative way. City records indicate that the Pilot Knob Road improvement occurred sometime between 1980 and 1981. In 1982, the Oster Addition was subdivided and the plat dedicated a 50'half right-of-way. This area of Pilot Knob Road still exists today with a total r-o-w of 100'. Although the County Road improvement preceded the creation of this subdivision, the combination of the 50'building setback from Pilot Knob and the standard 30'building from a City street (Oster Drive) results in a lot that is virtually unbuildable. Pleas see Exhibit A. SUMMARY/CONCLUSION Review of City records indicate that when this lot was platted in 1982 it was subject to the same setback requirements as those present today. It also was as unbuildable then as it is today. The requested variance will allow a building setback consistent with that existing on the lot to the south. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED To approve or deny a 14' rear yard setback Variance for Lot 6, Block 1, Oster Addition. / S-(9 I <� I w,• I...�.. ........ . r : LOST SPAR I .,r 1 e' • • 1 COiANTRY A '' I �� CORPORATE F€9 _ WDUSTRIAL� ROAD 4. I 1 61 g 1 �9r� 1 1rI x CENTER CURVE 1 'G`' 1 • .0%-ar --- t, LlWGHVIEW AVE._ I VE r� Rp • i v R PG W o CO NTRY i , c :_j, _.., wES4 1 t 1 r SERVICE I j HA ∎ 1T�y., UST ' W LSD'. J y O � , Qr i p1Y �Q �� Q % , I _- IfNE OAK ROAI1 f0. RD. 26 L� _4 I. 1 It t; ff �0 S <' (3 PLOT" I// '+C�� 1 j }� KN09�, o -a C�I �_ 0 LL 26' I 3 CLUBVEW DR I•AOOw.VIEw RD �tr RED RA •t'�� f �. RD. IL„ARRY ,. I.8 A. . .. • i ' . F � I I k, P I 51 r--� , L -1. OAK$ M. 1 ! 1 2, : :�, 1 NIQQue,,N• b J i /�1 g ua J Agi ' �I.1n`; t I 9`J __ W 1 .."• 8 S-V•16.). ?,,, -4 A • u NO..FLA o 1 ` 1 , S��� e � 0 I ? I • I ' 1 TAMARAC PT. , - BIRCH PT. I QUARRY 1 Y I - NORWAY PT. ' t d W 2,7 t.I c tR F fo •:weer n - IRONWOOD LA u ' V I' REDWOOD PT. ^ ,imi�. I i g DONA �.1. Y I 1 SPRUCE PT. '♦.� -_ CTI I YMKEE DOODLE ROAD - I —° �' 'pb Ir..' L PT. YANKEE DOODLE � T v WATER 1 :. �° 10 O ��„ tit � TREATMEN� �o < ''• � �� ,� mop FACILITY ate$ IcHrs�„ d �— y`' I CITY �; ��' I 24 •'LEAKY PARK CO O MACIU . ,COCA �S", c 1 rc' ` O'LEA 1 r.�, FACWTY W 1 LAK I �r I ~ I ROYAL f .AI I , `� BO I.'.. OAK CW 'd' DUCK �2� ( iv ;i,.W.., TR ,w 31 uww: ,• f 4 + �_ oucKwOOD 1 r SK HILL e�, PARK ROAD n LANE y>1 VMgl•YItIPl9Mai:■ a `3 .�. CT.a•�1 ,'J, A.GE• -- I; "" .• I a I .� W CRESTRIDCE LA. •OS ' \)MONTEREY LK rc a , o i �' �-L K N G �`,E '. KriLO LN. I� 1 B� PL. I ,� 4 7 � V RR�,y,�� 1 `� x COVE ,: J, /SH 4 ' ST ' . A'v CT. FAL CIS WA I1 - 1. 1 A qt A 4 IA RoLilo SHE • 1 LEY t ACT. MAR•1w�• w Acky,� <a J i ..w C CT. .4"� , E wESCO ROA ;.■ [.l:: /f ,�" W • BLACKHAWK . 'f Y 11111�v >I rwmi-ii- -F911. u PARK C �' �, f , E;wr Del ut. 52 3 WYE RrST :ESTVEW•KWAY S�. �_ AVE. 8 W' OCKY LA Fs; ; 1 K CUTTERS 1 ,LA. � .....1 • P D OR1wT , ♦ �bt, ie. - 5 ROCKY rp I r „ci Ls KiG��N1MFl 1. D f /� a + ^ , I ` ...n►,cop. 1 i1., •'• r��W CTRIBY 1 r7 . AREA MAP - •' a.W 5.0FJq4_sE IAA,.4 �- 127N R2ew s'L,0 • es 157.61 +125.00T 170.60 25.00• 50.00 d es • ID 11` - i t`% 6� 1'',6 of 1 T 10) \ 4 Z \d GI fe 6/ BUILDABLE AREA I \ \ 3 NN• \o0 4 of �� u 5 ���7 Iii.s'0 0 1 21 5082 X6'19` ate/ ; s :•• m y \B ‘4.•4'38'03" 5's ��0 86.16 .i d#`:'s• >.,,.::•,, 0 a a ( s3\\ A ‘8. 9�,10.2Coli t 9• \ \ ___10_8 1 %s::•:•:':•:<• s sp' v• er• o1 v.�\\ •\Z1 ', ' : 61.45 .N ,,0 �0 4• ' ci 1 '� •\ \ a'bi 6 \a9. O . •.)49.. v1 2 \� �•�,13 M � d 0 11 - - -- a m ♦ 113.41 ., 0 a 90.00- 5� Q / i �I 67 O.O%O'�89.1-9.37`1�1�2 t.---0.1.' 0 Z 'S tnN89•49'37"Wa Y ` �2. ., :~ 0 D96 . M DRIVE 6-,• s'- 04 o V O^ d 0 4's 9t� 87•5p'Sp• /lto o.40 •C�00 - 61.45 •.�':. 00 fDOA� n. 1 s? 7 s 49.7!3_J ^0. O iv, 11.23 1 Rs 60. 1 ZO"..` �" •• ro, A•10.43.33- ) ham° 314.16 ' 6 M h 14.95••••;31. Q I I; • e5.g5 iN'\ a 4+8.33'54" 1 I s Q 81.58'48 • f G d 101 Ito w - WI I I°o a ti •`�3 Z ` I a I t o Tr` •6' Q m1 I I o obi h ( 9 10 a `S S+, \ 1/1 ,NI 0�p Ia. oo o 1 s- 1Z 5 as, `` a v -I It. z I �1� '�\ • I 114.30 I a 30 1 30 0 • 108.31 111 170.60 •• 5.000 50.00 STREET j BED T To °n I -5KYLINE rimy 01/24/e3) - 144.20 384.01 •• T_c. 1 INr oc TNr NS MI.NS I r A O EXHIBIT A .7 areo� Do/v)/ .107/d s • v. M-oo.io,or•A' t o t1 9661•' i V1 ..I. ;� Z 107 ° • m . : 3 I n,. .'4 t a • .. �`. t �� N 11 tjP-A tem 111 1 i .4. A."' t - , `Itv- IF /tf*.e 1;.'XI R 5 �. I \t'. i 4.0 K w 1 �(xp', w w D S• V S Y c o G .�". a • 1 Sa s a . •�. ••1 u .LP C O C O.• • /L I é 8 8 R r C 0 ` Paul Klein March 29, 1995 1495 Lone Oak Road Eagan, MN 55121 454-4732 Dear Council Members: The property at 1405 Oster Drive is a tax forfeited, vacant lot.The previous owner of the property was allowed to develop the property into a marketable lot under the guidelines set forth by the City of Eagan. Several years later, Dakota County widened Pilot Knob Road and created an extra 50' setback from the street.The City of Eagan has a required 30'setback from the street in front of the house. If you subtract the 50' easement and the 30'setback from the 90' depth of the lot, you are left with a building site of about 10'. With these restrictions, it is easy to see why the previous owner had to relinquish the property to the county for taxes.The odd sized lot has now been made unbuildable and probably unsaleable. In studying this problem, I noticed that the lot next to this lot is identical and that there is a good sized home built on it.The home next door was allowed to be built 14' into the 50' setback or easement of Pilot Knob Road. In light of this discovery, Dakota County feels it would only be fair to grant the same variance for this lot as was granted for the lot next door.With this variance granted, we would be able to purchase and build on this lot.This would be a win-win situation for all of the parties concerned.The city and county would have-their back taxes paid in fulls They would earn revenue from the newly improved property.The property would be maintained by the new homeowner instead of at the county's expense.The neighbors would no longer have to call the county to complain about the eyesore of all the weeds in the vacant lot.Taxpayers would not have to pay for crews to come out to cut the weeds from the lot.All this can be done by simply granting equal consideration to this lot at that given to the identical lot next door. Sincerely, • page . Paul Klein / • Agenda Information Memo April 18, 1995 Eagan City Council Meeting F. VARIANCE - WENSMANN PROPERTIES ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: To approve or deny an 18' Variance to the 30' side yard setback requirement for Lot 6, Block 1, Safari Estates Second Addition. FACTS: • The property is zoned E (Estates), not R-1, as the applicant thought. • E (Estates) zoning requires 30' side yard setbacks. • A blanket 15' side yard setback for eighteen lots within this subdivision was requested by Fortune Realty in 1991, but denied by the City Council. The minutes reflect Council's preference to consider Variances on a case-by-case basis. ISSUES: • The adjacent property owner has indicated opposition to the Variance request. • The builder has completed the foundation prior to being informed that the setbacks were not met. • While it is the legal responsibility of the property owner/developer to insure that City setback requirements are met, it is also the case that in the building permit review this setback problem was not identified. BACKGROUND/ATTACHMENTS: (1) Staff report - page l&sl:leeP Lap PLANNING REPORT CITY OF EAGAN REPORT DATE: April 10, 1995 CASE #: 31-V-5-4-95 APPLICANT: Wensmann Properties HEARING DATE: April 18, 1995 PROPERTY OWNER: Same PREPARED BY: Mike Ridley REQUEST: Variance (side yard setback) LOCATION: 1994 Safari Trail COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: D-I, Single Family ZONING: Estate, E ,SUMMARY OF REQUEST Wensmann Properties has requested approval of an 18' Variance to the side yard setback for Lot 6, Block 1, Safari Estates 2ND Addition located east of Interstate 35E and west of Galaxy Avenue in the SE 1/4 of Section 31. AUTHORITY FOR REVIEW Section 11.40, Subd. 3, C., states: 1. If the Council shall determine that the special conditions applying to the structures or land in question are peculiar to such property or immediately adjoining property and do not apply generally to other land or structures in the district in which said land is located, and that the granting of the application is necessary for the applicant. 2. That granting of the proposed variance will not be contrary to the intent of this Chapter and the Comprehensive Guide Plan. 3. That granting of such variance will not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate demonstrable hardship or difficulty. BACKGROUND/HISTORY Wensmann Properties acquired this parcel, apparently believing that it was zoned R-1.The site plan submitted with the building permit application was designed based on R-1 setbacks. City staff assumed the R-1 zoning and associated setbacks were in order and issued a building permit on March 23, 1995. l ( Planning Report - Wensmann Variance April 18, 1995 Page 2 Wensmann started construction of the foundation and the neighboring property owner to the east contacted the City regarding the setback of the foundation to the east property line. The zoning error was discovered and Wensmann was told to stop construction. The applicant was given the option of re-configuring the home or requesting a setback variance. The 33 lot Safari Estates 2ND Addition was zoned Estate and platted in 1989. The Estate Zoning District requires larger single family minimum standards for lot area, lot width, and building setbacks. In comparison to'the R-1 district, setbacks for the dwelling unit are increased from 10' to 30' on the side and from 15' to 30' in the rear and the side setback for the garage increased from 5' to 10'. The front building setback is the same in both E and R-1. Staff performed a review of City parcel files for the 33 lots in this subdivision and determined that of the 17 developed lots, five homes do not meet the 30' side yard setback. These deviations range from 3' to 18'; however, it appears these setback shortfalls went unnoticed at the time of building permit review because there are no records of variances being requested or approved. On December 17, 1991, the City Council denied a blanket 15' side yard house setback variance for 18 lots within the Safari Estates 2ND Addition requested by Fortune Realty. The minutes reflect the Council's reluctance to grant a blanket variance and noted a preference to consider variances on a case by case basis. The subject lot was one of the 18 lots denied the setback variance in 1991. EVALUATION OF REQUEST According to the applicant, there are private covenants governing this subdivision that require minimum house square footage and three-car garages. The lot in question, as subdivided, meets the 100' lot width at the street but does not meet the 100' width at the 30' front building setback. The cumulative effect of a relatively narrow lot width, 30' house side yard setback, and the privately required minimum house size and three-car garage result in this lot being difficult to develop; however, a specially designed home oriented in more of a north/south configuration could meet the three car garage requirement, square footage of the proposed home, and the Estate setback requirements. Planning Report - Wensmann Variance April 18, 1995 Page 3 SUMMARY/CONCLUSION This setback variance will allow the proposed home to be built on this lot; although, a different style of home, specially designed for this lot, could accommodate the Estate setback requirements and the privately imposed size requirements. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED To approve or deny an 18' Variance to the side yard setback for Lot 6, Block 1, Safari Estates 2ND Addition. • 3 • -- ' �f ,�. f �Y _- " DEERWOOD 1 nli OR. 1 Y ,r g - �� 4 — l,tca+lC IpAL u �� 1 PtAU '- - - ..... - 0 � . ::r ,::� - PARK •l• �� ENER,� 4 i . l.. ~�J r 5 , 1 s�t,ILA L., 1 Q4 li 460 1 t,..14?DOWINist nv u Qo rue 1 11NIM , a r FLEY_if _ 6. RK n t':� . A Cl. 11"1,110' , I ---VP7-1 0.11.. ,;:sir., 1 g',I-cum. L.A.K1� ----c---T. —1—-— — •+ I�Yy 1 ...: t. 00,0. ri I p it �I rQ? 1� - w, . w, 3 ritsr\s4. y 1 A:Aa P T III CAN 1 �..� ..i r'. SHALE 1 ; " ..w & F•y r P L t ®PARK.43 II �I,.� w a, .;.x.;.:1,4;„.:' n-:w A , •�: is A . ~':`.;4,a,,:,tr N;� ,rl - ;i1': ' ROAD ' " 'I '•RAMN't'eke: ' • I I .•Y S RK t m. 4:1 & C) a 661;)LAKE It ,� r•RD. a.F ). . pD. J / m CLfi ROAD _ J _11M i_ %rt. 86 ���i � _ _ - __. I ALAf1E �NOIAy N011u ,�` �, 1 irr O �♦ , ati,, y1 ANN WAY �r '!J ' C1. I. ,o. �� ;8 i-••e cm. Y KETTL r� �� w • r i ` n 1 QT E_ QAIf DR. ,1 1.1 ,Jw T �1 s RJ •,,, 0. +'�I sow J vk A 111110 50 --# • ....1,1 8, , * i -] 34140°5'2 ' 'cf 41 .,,.ir�u11 PARK •T ar An.L/r. u- .Mxirutt/r. I u �` 1 rg • r 4144/l. IN.I.AN.►A Ir. ' .4 1 II. 1'r•IhAvOrit It L� \J- I ' lM Y�.{I�II. 144 IMIA Pl. 4 ti . I -, l4-IlU11.J■11. IY.+I.UIIO.PI. • . 7 ... .'c hf ►T. au,M.IA p1/r. 1 r 7 µ(• ,,,/ APPLE VALLEY l� • . 1'x P01 MAR e0 '95 10:01 •{.VS,.Qta d. % .. . p.V /4�ti53 E++ 9S'�•43 .0 / ny +113' Few 752.3 `` : C 9s0.471- v, _0; I e...n, A'007; 141 t ? :"'OP b—c..,� Mme,. 953.3 " _ : >��°°•,, ‘41 r� �r 15 i . 6A4SEnnet-►T•. L. 945.2 N • =. 71. b3 , S ' I t.. 951..3 i ` "'• 43 / Q Q, _-40 131 i ( ' ‘%. f i ‘■ .61 °Se° 10/ 1-4f 7---• �r 3 4 / 01S4 J To, q.• / tri- Gx15 T(..+t, .� io. '4 . M /" rrl a Ct , 4°� • Nei, Ste. /, .:: x�1 +.o• Fr 9 . 1rr; -' 9 8" tr1J 11467 :~ ` r / / Plea pose 0 •', f /� n f+o v.E M I -7 . �, ft .... i / .. I r • i 4164 i 11 Q6)% ', / q.4 1 k � 8oT i TM of P Tl w M , / Gv? LL ..EtiiY'.. To we 'Sit` ►4. T'""' / / . .93174S ihUm.i4.'CAST 1 , / 41'4 �.�-�`.' .S w4�- 1-44E..A Paz( ``J / �iCc�V O�. � / / �G�°) G/ n wE+,-r .+.y:A=►,4- -rt4C at 9 STt9R M MI kA, S1.�PE UP*AR.4 .is�- ,, z,c. ,y2 , iii u Tn f,cC D ) 11 F.4.4 741,3 ' Q1 1 / . sic / ' i w ' L" Pei1 .a 6E uD ,•w r " arar-rr EASsi-fcNT o,�a`b c• .F.Me ,Y p . l+40 0 . 9 'QcnoQe s.�a3Z rS 199s� St.FAP.t 'rite 9s9 • f • • PROPOSED DESIGN /4Ls • nif • • .. 1 'I • M y •t_• • ••____, 1: I. 1 • " w I 1 . _ cc ii• fr -. L . 1 j 'I r: •. 1 2p •/i ,'L ;.I -f J Itf :1^ • V ...fZ • If ' � { r: o . W Q . %).. �r ► • • e r 1 ,S„ ° ' ; I�• • I ���. • • , i1i iii ; r�i qq o• V ••�• • .� .. iii 1 ,: a. d C,..) ...I\ -, • • •••••••,.' : :::*:::*i: • r �, '�\ 1111... • J Z • • \ • • • . — ✓•i, 1• Y•?2,, ,ate• •• •• Z j;: I"' :,�.;/` / , .f•`‘\‘ ':'.,N1% • %.1: rzwe r ... 111Y.K'/� "• I��` 9•� • • 1 ..f_•M rI••+. 44 U • `.' • • I ` .4.1.4...........:r. �<•'�1 �r ~• 'r l •• r_ •1 I• • • ' to 1 V= {'.,.f•W f • ?in.ln'1 it :IC '< fi• _ •. i` f / .. i !•I< I•• j•�f� ••••••6.:g•f•;f1‘:40,1•• t.•v, 5` e'�+,1i ��� /� ',i�» ,.. 0.11,, .• • •,•.;1.. :; :''•'j.'v;i• .,��,' �'`CC4,�4I .y .::::*.e.:72::•• j ' 'I • w1./ 1. 1.•I, ~ • .. - :4 •r • V• A 1•M .,••'•1••' ...::;:o.'A�;;.,1 /�.r j� '�I•WN ��\•� :�r •• ;`l �,; • r..-.!.. � • ..2 I' /<•• .f .,`• i/I�.I 1 /I.f •� •• : '•:••ti. r•/�' 2 14 �M J 1. •♦• W•(f) i ' ‘k.,•:•::::.:.:„:.•:•:1'':: :''' `'•);,:r •• ^ • ;0.:. ::.:::' i:� /3 •',, ' /' N 7� � 1f '�"• 01 1.... •i �1 W x...:.:.:.::,..7?..:::::._..:.*.,..` •. '/1 ;4.:.:: . :::1::'•. - y0• • a 1, ` `+rr,,'�p,,• co is i+••••x•:•:•:•::::::::::::::::.:'• :. O:'� 1.•�•.:' •'% ••. I ✓ /•, •• • •. V 40° 00 • Q •,; : ; :;;, ,•` 1:::::..4:::::-..%.4..:4::‘,./ fit' •�, N • •'r'► 0 '4 i ' • ' • •iR:::.: ;tii:•l.e ••ti /, . L. • fr ` 1 . 0 4• r • I . .y'��' •::: ,:/.�.•;•rte•:••.,•:.: '�( .d, ▪ a /) ''`� V•• r Yom. i ' :;''' •':::il.i:, t '':•:z::,4 ' ' •" ,. , . •• 41 Q r•. Z •• • .:iris•- ..•F \.",•. r:'•" _• - • '•I ; 'r•` :?':.ter • ........'..,.AP--- •. .. CC ` p :.... : :. ?• •.:k. •••+ 1 • 1�i, ,� ti d t i • K •r •11:* ;'017°1 • 1::: •• En •V/ . •10'•01 „ •� IIr• ','.�` •: ''''r' "+; �•:F�, �IS•�a ►t• W •' ,, • y '• 4 " Si'. •, • •• �•+ ,•';' :IY ^ y4. r + . • ct: • • r .. 1 JI /• • • • • 10.04.«0.1 Lt II • • L , 1: • /6 (.,,, - MUM • 41ra,,,,-..............,_ . -- ----—------ - —- -- - MI •.•••■••••I .• I .......... ... * • ''' • • .... . •841 4... 1.•.. sa................ .../ . ‘ '— " ',... ir:,..--, a: =, .. . . „ — • . ... ...': 6k *.1' - -1 -••• • : ••••,,, . 1■0 WV, ••Il• • - - 'I -• .• I..,, ,:•••,tt. • ....:7-. A. • ' ;g t.„,•,v. t..ii.,,,..r .• .... • • .. is*, ' . .1 1 I ... 'of .• i, •. 4114;4011,11411 -411‘444.: i. :./..........I):. N.. 0 ••1 - '77*. 7•. I ....i•ifi. 44 1;...41 to..111111416:1'‘ 0 i •• 4 : ...I I 54444440:104114140% 1 I - •-• . -- ...._ 1 • T z - s'N..,......i.4 * .4S4 ..d.... • „,....-.4. •it , = • ..• •• ..• ..t PI v. 1;1• • • in tti J1 .. .• ..it4;14Ns%,.. v 4, . ••.a PI • • • :2 0 C.; ..... ., . 41...a • .: '. , 4101tith....• .4.* 4;,%..... 2 .• S... z2 ; •..,,,,' '•'. INS:....,• IO• ..... 3.1 i i a ,.. • ..* . ' i i .4 • .0.1 • o 7., .1!. ' •..) . ... .... ,4„.• .N. •••• WA '. . ''.• • 44%.41 .::::-4:7: 114;:74-:.. .i:_..'",‘ "*. 4., i;IA's., — ,, .• . . v..; .........,. 1 ....V...; . s ...."..% • ■ ... --SiArilli Pi°..i..,.• . . .. I 17' I •• • .411444044000. •T •.,. . ;I.,: I e)• .; .. ,} so:',, 23 . ' .• e 1 "• • 2 ,• I • * lit • •ft.s.e• i. 1r 4.40 i . ... Ilk / .1.4.4, .-. ll •.0 v •- / 40 ii _41111141k 4 :;. ' ...:_:.4),...14 :A AI ; • . R1 itir'0,, Aliikt. 4 . 0 , 1.- ,.41 ? .•.•.24' 0 :%I: 0 ) \tric\ 9\s\!ei .,, .,.. ..,....... ..,.:, . L p • ,:• • , . 'VA. Irio, 1401.: ,.....-• . . . .....4. a - s - . • o'' F.ss. ... ...,, 4,5.: .; •....*, 0 i.:„,-, . 5 • 4,„?o •,e •u-a-V v,.,b, ‘vo V ... 1, N,5„,.. %il , • el . • Clip V i *.". ..... • ....-..-. .. .- . ....... . • • --- — . •.. I m.-- .--........-.--•-.......-•• - - • • 2 bd • / • • / I 2 _ . . . u, E . 0 e/J Z 60 f 0 ft3 0 • S i • . ... . 03 0 . g b . . • . • Cd . . . . . . . . ,...-::-.tizs•----- ......./...A.:;:::..m.. t • _......„---..:„.....,.,-,...--s......-:...:::::::.zo...3ww44- • - -,--:.-" --:-.:....:•:Xf4;430;;;:.•••••• . - .• . I ,,z,Zi.,:.,---:./.*:::Af5MZ:,,'' -,-A-----,---..- ....;V......•:::•1•,/,....:....•..•:.•••• . ea • 1.4 ..•.•:::,•$:::•:.:•. ,'.;•:::•/...:10•.•*........••.•:. . . 1 ca .111 • ",:::::::::::::::::::•::::.m.. -::::::::::::::::::.:•.•:•:•.•:, 0 ‹ d■it 1116.4%: . -•::::•:::::::::::::::::: •••:•:•:::•:•:::•:•:•:•:•:::•:•::::.;:•:•:•:•:•:::::.;.:::::::::::::::.::::::,.:::::.,::::;.:.:.:.:::::.::::::;.::::::::::::::.. - 0 • •:•:•:•-•.:-:.:-:.:::::-:-----,:-.,:,:-:--..;:t.„.-.,,.......:.........---.::..7:::-::-.W:=::::::k::::: ::- • ..: . \\sislikiraveademaiii) ■ , _...... L, WENSMANN PROPERTIES, INC. 3312 151st St.W. Rosemount, MN 55068- (612)423-1179 • 04/05/95 To Whom it May Concern I am applying for a variance request on lot 6 block 1 Safari Estates , 2nd Addition. Apparently this lot has an E-Estates zoning which I was not aware of or had ever heard of before. I have built many homes in Eagan and the surrounding communities . In every case other than an acreage lot or a corner lot the side yard sidebacks have been either a 5 ' garage side and 10 ' house side, or 10 ' garage side and 10 ' house side. After reading through the covenants and meeting the sqaure footage re- quirements, I submitted the plans and surveys tbethhecity for a permit. A permit was then issued, a footing inspection approved and the founda- tion half way complete when we were called by the city and told to stop construction because we did not meet the 30 ' side yard setback required for E zoning. I have submitted along with this variance request three copies of the survey showing the 30 ft . setbacks marked in yellow. As you can see, no way does the home fit on the lot, nor could it be possible to re- design so it did fit on the lot. It will be awfully difficult to design any home that meets the square footage and sideyard setback re- quirements to fit on this lot. Upon review of the surveys of different homes built in Safari Estates 2nd Addition, I know of four homes , and probably more, that do not meet the E zoning requirements . They are lots 5 and 8 block 2 and lots 10 and 20 block 2. If variances were granted for them, I see no reason why this variance should not be granted. • Thank you for the review and consideration of this request. L so Since ly erry ensmann Pre dent Wensmann Properties / ef • Agenda Information Memo April 18, 1995 Eagan City Council Meeting G. VARIANCE - CITY OF EAGAN ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: To approve or deny a 115' setback Variance for a proposed future reservoir to be located in the southwest corner of the Frances Franz property south of Deerwood Drive and east of I-35E. FACTS: • The City of Eagan is in the process of negotiating land acquisition to construct a water reservoir. • • The City needs to know how much land it should be acquiring. • The City's Zoning Ordinance requires a 2 to 1 setback for public facility structures in areas zoned PF (Public Facilities). The proposed water tank will be approximately 83' tall resulting in a required 165' setback. • None of the five other water towers in the City meet the 2 to 1 setback; however, there have been no official Variances requested or approved in these prior instances. ISSUES: • The City Council needs to determine if the 2 to 1 setback Variance is appropriate in all instances. City staff needs direction in order to pursue acquisition of the property. • The City Council may want to direct staff to amend the Ordinance to reflect Council policy in this matter. For example, the Council could direct an amendment that the setback for public facilities is 2 to 1 or as specifically determined by City Council action. In this way, Variances that should be based on hardship could be avoided in the future. BACKGROUND/ATTACHMENTS: (2) Staff report - page l-"/Q H-13 Memo from Public Works Director - page 17'&17y I GI PLANNING REPORT CITY OF EAGAN REPORT DATE: April 11, 1995 CASE #: 21-V-4-3-95 APPLICANT: City of Eagan HEARING DATE: April 18, 1995 PROPERTY OWNER Francis Franz Estate PREPARED BY: Mike Ridley REQUEST: Variance LOCATION: South of Deerwood Drive, East of I-35E COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: D-II, Mixed Residential ZONING: Agricultural, A SUMMARY OF REQUEST The City of Eagan (Public Works Department) is requesting a sideyard setback Variance of 115' for the future construction of the City's sixth water reservoir to be located on unplatted property, zoned Agricultural, and identified by PID# 10-02100-011-50 which is located along the east side I-35E on the south side of Deerwood Drive in the SW 1/4 of Section 21. BACKGROUND/HISTORY The City Council approved a Waiver of Subdivision separating a 5 acre parcel (containing the house and shed) from the 31 acre parcel. The proposed reservoir will be located on a portion of the residual 26 acre parcel. The Public Works Department has prepared a site plan for the reservoir/water tower and is actively pursuing the acquisition of the land through eminent domain proceedings as authorized by Council action on October 4, 1994. This variance application is being processed at this time so a description of the land area necessary to complete the project can be precisely defined. EXISTING CONDITIONS The site is characterized by severe slopes and mature vegetation. The high point of the property is located in the southwestern corner. Except for the Franz house and shed, the site contains no other structures. '70 Planning Report - Variance April 18, 1995 Page 2 EVALUATION OF REQUEST The reservoir is proposed for the high point of the site. Once the property for the reservoir is acquired, the City will rezone the site to Public Facilities, PF. The City Code lists the setback for public facility structures as 2' for every 1' of height. The proposed water tank will be approximately 83' tall which results in a required 165' setback. A review of the existing conditions of the City's five other water towers reveals that the 2' for 1' setback is not met in any instance; however, there are no records indicating any requested variances for these situations. To determine the City's needs for property acquisition, this setback issue must be defined. In light of the fact that the proposed site is completely surrounded by undeveloped land,the required setback may be excessive in that any future progress in the area will develop around the tower as opposed to the tower being constructed after development has occurred. SUMMARY/CONCLUSION The setback necessary for the reservoir at this location must be reviewed with regard to the existing development conditions and the likely impact of the tank location. It appears the 50' setback will provide an adequate transition particularly if the tower is constructed prior to any development of the surrounding property. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED To approve or deny a 115'setback for the proposed reservoir to be located in the southwest corner of the Francis Franz Estate J • . T Q 41►c te r•• !Y + I* ,fi wr,tofeii . .`t.rt. op . V Et:i.ti i.• I? '' 1: 117 ;Itt'''?/-dry.' / . 44; I bil Palo&;144.31-- .1611-11 / be �I.: I� �.L. fa<� M� ` yr . 1 r R.w+r /{ ,��� a•fop' t VAL\ i f-. =� y-.ti! i" ' i.•f r Co�� y 4, v.�1•' ,try-C' • `L� i i�UMM� a' �i•6' . I•`VTR _ K:. rTr`33a c •.. �' a �7r • : M , P. tx•14,47,2W''' ....-- a, It. ...1:; ,I!-Zr9;f1c...S1‘, • ''.,JP,!".1 . i.l. ..., -.- ant i:i . i\ULI 1,4. .4 raNyzJ:,_01. 1 --rr..6r2rIoN ci 1 4 stri.fti...... ;7414,k‘Y. ± :4.w. / pc-ti...11A•alioncoul, iv...La.-..t: . a .:-4=-E.:1--,-‘,„ '1"R-0:I. 7 --• I ‘;■_.t:Iivii • "e`Nr.„. • • et' • •• . �.,. 4 401 ! • f k......., t„/ live • I. 1 IJ �(� , , •� L is WM•*ryr`• WK.I. ii II AR O ri r �IYMirlDi r IOW • i i V'"' irral , :�! GIB/• -` / i• f4�,gt M /(tAC041"11'wJC►�, ft►7IW�fm •Lw..c, I. •! '4 w ` • w In . _ . . ' 119` CT. 1 ,. M 1114 1 ,I'- .. '� ��_.�.J( © 1 l Jl rea' 4r �.>to; � � �( r i :�i�� it ''''7,4 M 1 r rcrr an– col, -<.. u . _.._ C draw ; ky t •r.. �`f , ► 66 11 / kvi;/ Iw, a fY; .• a s,I, / 1�I,1�I.oft I - ' alig a/c., 3 ,,f • . INA 1 ... . '�14:,:.b.ii __ • ,affititt� , ,'i- / O .. /R 1 TA .1 1 I. ' Ie:11 4 _ Mi ;f Its ti� -: �. " - ' - � _ 73, w . l'''•••• f � – _:1_ "I" • ,V:-, R I i4 h .. ,_ .,..v.,..),, • te ) ., - • .."). • I�• f �( . „ �% q 1 , *41. � RI i 1 • 1Age1 s -1 / - J LOCATION - • % .2 7 c;---- . . . \ __,-,,'----'-":--,..." -.d..... ... 210222=0M . CONIFEROUS ,t' / = a, ^� I , / 1- 010-20 O t TOQO � '...•• .. ..."2.. NO' "E •.\ ■ ..- •. L ee�o+ A j K.C. of 1 d=- O�pZ• OF I N 7 ''-• - MANN' _ ________------ • DEERw40D DRIVE \ PARCEL 50' SETBACK 165' SETBACK ")>> 10-02100-011-50 2.698 ac. 4.057 ac. ' 10-02100-011-51\ .064 ac. 1.034 ac. ` . 2762 cc. 5.091 ac. <{ :;>';{; , i'a ';» . o„-so • lv+ t f�=P�: .A i i r, K i :i, `{''eNt`'vi =•'{v � l t y.,.k �'' i= i)+{ r - PRORQSi,l+.RPEP:r1R<•`"Yli `>;',11EIGNT./83' 4;;: f):s} :'t-f."`.f` i..,t`x 1; 50' ...;X,,•∎...A ._='; ', .n•-,,:t; }:,,st, = ,00� ) 3s`` SETBACK! ;' I",; lk. , }.._ 10-02100-011-50 `k. + {+••{) '=^it..i{{tt){7 1/4-- {tt. t.; ay.. •.,{f"4. P.I.D• .tA ,-._ ,1%.•r ..„.,, �'fy+tt_t•s`�{.�S�oi,..,, S. ri. f•`4 y'•) • .,42':r.:ti2'•` :i ra.;..fp., ....,-, ia,,c,,e?.f'r` ••..cwt{�. \ ) ., \ U / to 133 w P.W. 10-02100-011-51 ' �� 2r . APRIL 1995 011-51 I l 3 • DEERW - RESERVOIR 2102727530001 Irk I'M ill AO .�� MEMO —city of eagan TO: PEGGY REICHERT, DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT FROM: TOM COLBERT, DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS DATE: April 6, 1995 SUBJECT: VARIANCE REQUEST-SIDEYARD SETBACK PROJECT 678, DEERWOOD RESERVOIR PARCEL 10-02100-011-50 (FRANZ/RECHTZIGEL) In accordance with the City's Comprehensive Water Supply Plan and-5-Year Capital Improvements Program, it is timely for us to begin the process of constructing the community's sixth water reservoir. In accordance with our long-term Comprehensive Plans, it has been proposed to be located south of Deerwood Drive and east of I-35E on the above-referenced parcel. This structure will be similar in size and design to the Yankee Doodle, Lexington and Safari Reservoirs. It will be a steel tank approximately 110' in diameter and 83'tall. While the property is zoned Agricultural, its long-term land-use guide is D-II. The Public Works Department has prepared a site plan for this site (copy enclosed) and is actively pursuing the acquisition of the land through eminent domain proceedings as authorized by Council action on October 4, 1994. Upon the completion of the description for acquisition, we will be processing an application to rezone this property and amend the Comp Guide Plan to Public Facilities (PF). However, we must determine the boundaries of the property to be acquired. One of the defining criteria is the setback required by City Code. In accordance with Section 11.2, Subdivision 7.C.2, the setback for public facility structures shall be 2'for every 1' in height. Based on a proposed 83'tall reservoir,this computes to a minimum 165'setback from the base of the reservoir. This setback seems to be excessive in relationship to the setback that presently exists for four out of the five other reservoirs within our community. The following is a table;showing setbacks for the City's other reservoirs. i i . 71 • Location Heights Required Current Setback Adjacent Setback • Zoning/Land use Sperry 145' 290' 55' R & D, P, D-3 Reservoir Yankee 80' 160' 62' PD (LI) Doodle Reservoir LL Lexington 80' 160' 106' R-1 & P Reservoir Safari 80' 160' 38' R-1 Reservoir Cliff Road 32' 65' 49' R-2 & R-1 Reservoir I'm not sure when the current setback zoning requirement was implemented but, as can be seen, none of the City's other reservoir facilities meet this setback. Before the City can proceed with finalizing the detailed description of the area that must be acquired through condemnation, I would like to have the City Council consider granting a Variance to the City Code allowing a setback of 50 feet. I have attached copies of the site plan layout for the proposed Deerwood Reservoir along • with each of the other reservoirs showing the location of the tank in relationship to the adjacent zoning/land use. Also, attached is a Variance request form completed by the • Public Works Department on behalf of the City of Eagan. I would appreciate your assistance in processing this request to the City Council so that a final determination can be made to the configuration and size of the parcel that must be acquired by the City of Eagan. Historically, by constructing this type of public facility prior to the development of the adjacent property minimizes many of the concerns that the code would try to address by its setback requirement. Please let me know when this can be presented to the City Council and if any additional information is needed. Respectf submitted, Director of Public Works cc: Mike Foertsch, Assistant City Engineer Wayne Schwanz, Superintendent of Utilities Mike Ridley, Project Planner ,- Attachments: Site Plans &Variance Request 7 NOTICE OF PUBLIC MEETING CITY OF EAGAN NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT ON Tuesday, April 18, 1995 at 7:00 o'clock p.m. a Public Meeting will be held by the Eagan City Council at the Eagan City Hall pursuant to the application of City of Eaaan in accordance with Chapters 11 and 13 of the Eagan City Code to consider the application for a sideyard setback variance of 110 feet to the required 160 foot setback for a water reservoir. of property located in Dakota County, Minnesota, T-27N, R-23W, described as follows: P. I. D. #10-02100-011-50 located in the SW 1/4 of Section 21 south of Diffley Road and east of 35E. • DATED: March 29. 1995 EAGAN CITY COUNCIL-CITY OF EAGAN E.J. VanOverbeke City Clerk The City of Eagan is committed to the policy that all persons have equal access to its programs, services, activities, facilities and employment without regard to race, color, creed, religion, national origin, sex, disability, age, marital status or status with regard to public assistance. Auxiliary aids for persons with disabilities will be provided upon advance notice of at least 96 hours. If a notice of less than 96 hours is received, the City of Eagan will attempt to provide such aid. 77 (10 . - . . .,- .. ZOOOL10.0060 'OMB -4.....%.1 ilr S 41 1 0 , . m o , E 4/ AM I l■- "I I I D 1 cc i cc 1 al i —1 41 a. 0, i to • —.—.—.——.—.—.---:--.—.-----.—.— — r OV08 M31/413M01 / -.) iv V....ce ,..,.. ep, 42„ af. AM." •.1> ' ita,,ZA k. ?V‘.. '"VM't-L 0 MU WattlY,"et A.1:40011 • 4, it trS'A ,....., — i CC g 1 1:3 ! • 1\ I I 8 < Ct I 0 '\\ \ \ \ .. 421 1 0 3 1 Le \* 6 /Of 0 0 o WIN \ \\.‘ .r \‘ *. 13 L.L.1 \\\ c\\ • - / 5 g g 1 g I (.1)) \ .‘‘ `\ \ I LLJ v, 40 al toN W. rs. \\\ \ y_ .1 / ...,_ C•1 ts1 \\\ \ \ 0 ...' / I 1 CK .. 0 I kill \ ‘ )' \ \ V •. . 271 l 7 --; V. ' 1 .- ,• . . " .■ V .:' . A. \ .‘ / 4 g ii I o \ : C•1 _/ .Ir.' \- .li '1/.1 ti V: 1 1/ . ;F) I • s' 0 "...-4 81 \ 4 (Z 17 : v,-:- / 1 ° w , y • • - .• / ....., It . . w It / ./ t / ...x...• ... _ • ,DYB.L3S 0 7 • • / '''S ":2?--).:•J-- ' . ,--,7 .:.:;7.:-:7 '."<t_)-f.2..:•.•?:;',.:-..':""a '%-:...,...:g35:::.:_.:.a.;403.„:.:::_!-.....,;:,:•.:::): .... 1 a 1 i . / / 7 7 .,.....: ..„.....:„. ,..„, ..,..„: I , i •. , ' �Y0 - \l w Li - �_ {/IN w 1 cr 0 *MP,/ o W g t. n`e � \\ �%;,./� \ \ W o I I \ Z 8- Ii ' • • d£ \ \ , Z9 \./ I I t _ -... I� •*. � E/ � m 1 �_ ` (13V08 1 310000 33NNVA) in '0N '021 '00 \\, •1 J i L\_ - r - - • �� < r •w •w \I 2 1 ../.......T: ---- .; ;/...---"---"-- 17/ '� 1 !r! • 1 • N.'‘ ly.i i 4 i.P •4) 4, al Ve ! P� \g+o�P.� i I - @ 0 Pr\Et 1 g i W ce LPG I tD r:::1 o W 1-- --17-I-) - ',••r -TV--.. I1 .- - a -I / 1 II AVM NOIONIX31 ! I'I�1 o II / !I D �"� I I II , , Z I I- . ,1 II I I I 1 C0 —mot II o � I \t ? o t1 Q I' ,\ ® X ,.,(...../1 I II 1 IX \\�! - J -t W n° [ E C - G n! \ ! tt n5t I c 701 I 1't t L� N 1- - b I T Q 6 � .� 3102723770041 M O 27 w i / I 1 E p�,,,� 3102723770021 1 06.3 "r"` 1995 7 1 N 2 31027 0040 310 d r y�o2 I 22 P ' ../ ■ 32 1 PG' 1 1 3102723770041 a G - 2p \ 21 0 �/ 23 \ I / 31027 3770043 Q r' • n 111 ° 24 N n 25 I/ `` \ `\ 1 r. c N N L i 1 3t027 37)00{4 g`y► \\ \ i n o I n \ I "� I I 30 r. 1 I ROYALE DRIVE :.z.a I -� I 1 II --/ co CITY OF EAGAN —— 1 `• _:==_=_= 1 i/ I — 1 I I 1 HEIGHT ,_ _ _ ` /!i .702723770050 rn 76' - 1/ 4 °j 111 g 1 52'1 1 \I I! 115' I III ; o^`�3 // 2 1 1\, I N N0 '� \ �// 1\ \ i /// 3102723770048 10212 1 \ `/) \ ■ -..•••••., .•••••/-m A1TLT B SAFARI RESERVOIR CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 4 __ -- •-- _ - 31x1 AS:13MM --- !JLi \ 1 Z . - ' U 1 1\ '3 Q I 4 \ /Q , Y \ \\ W CC Ii ki 1.100■ 3~r ♦ L o Ce LI .szt ill Ai - 0 \\\\ I � _ N W �/ M Ce 1 1 , A N 2 1I Aa3 7i I 2 N¢ 0 1 ul I 1 , I �\ N 1 V 1.1- L" ■ I 1� ! ' 1 I):a v - aI/I J • / 1 U 1 I 1� a 1 1 0 1 to 1 4. I I 1 N ° } I I I I I I I 1 I 1 I I ' I _ 111 I I 1 I • 210 21VW S3H3 '�.\. \ I 1 r - - -��\\ , I i �n I Agenda Information Memo • April 18, 1995 Eagan City Council Meeting A. REZONING & PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION - WHISPERING WOODS ELEVENTH ADDITION ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: 1. To approve or deny a Rezoning for Huila,Inc. of 20.97 acres from A(Agricultural)to R-1 (Single Family) located on the west side of Slater Road in the southwest quarter of Section 31. 2. To approve or deny a Preliminary Subdivision for the Whispering Woods Eleventh Addition consisting of 49 single family lots on 20.97 acres and 10' setback Variances on Lots 1, 2, 9, 10, 18, 19, 20, 30, 31, 32, 41, 42, and 43 located on the west side of Slater Road in the southwest quarter of Section 31. FACTS: • The Advisory Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on this matter at its meeting of March 28, 1995. • • The Advisory Planning Commission recommends approval of the Rezoning. • The Advisory Planning Commission recommends approval of the subdivision subject to the 13 conditions set forth in their minutes. ISSUES: None BACKGROUND/ATTACHMENTS: (2) APC minutes - page (a —/(1 -3 Staff report - page /ery--„;Q I • Page 17 March 28, 1995 • ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION WHISPERING WOODS ELEVENTH ADDITION REZONING AND PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION Chairperson Miller opened the next public hearing of the evening regarding a Rezoning of 20.97 acres from A(Agricultural)to R-1 (Single Family) and a Preliminary Subdivision(Whispering Woods Eleventh Addition) of 20.97 acres and 49 single family lots and setback Variances located in the SW% of Section 31 on the west side of Slater Road. Project Planner Tyree introduced this item. Ms. Tyree highlighted the information presented in the City staffs planning report dated March 2, 1995. Tyree noted the - background and history, the existing conditions, surrounding uses and the proposed preliminary subdivision plan of the subject property. Ms. Tyree noted that the developer's requesting setback variances of ten feet on Lots 1, 2, 9, 10, 18, 19, 20, 30, 31, 41, 42 and 43, and a 20'variance to the required 50' street frontage requirement for Lot 32, Block 1, in order to save trees in the rear portion of those lots. Ms. Tyree further stated that the variances are necessary due to the steep slopes which make development of these lots more difficult. Ms. Tyree further noted that two conditions to the preliminary subdivision approval must be added: (1) that the preliminary plat is subject to a final plat approval; and(2)the developer may have a setback variance of no more than ten feet on Lots 1, 2, 9, 10, 18, 19, 20, 30, 31, 41, 42 and 43. The applicant, Scott Hilla, was present but gave no comment. A Burnsville .resident, Jim Miller, stated that he owns property to the rear of the proposed preliminary plat. Mr. Miller stated he had no objection to the proposed preliminary subdivision, but only inquired as to why the applicant was seeking rezoning now when the area is already under development. City Attorney Dougherty explained that in order for the applicant to develop the property it must be rezoned to single family and typically property will not be rezoned until the property is ready for development. Community Development Director Reichert interjected by explaining to Mr. Miller that the applicant is developing the Whispering Woods development in phases and as the parcels are developed they are first rezoned. Another Bumsville resident, Sue Yonke, who owns the adjacent property in back of Lot 4, Block 1 of the proposed development inquired as to what the open "pie-shape" area was between her lot and Lot 4. Mr. Hillla explained that that area is Burnsville- owned property and used by the City for access to the Burnsville Pond E24. Member Carlson stated that while she would prefer that Wall Street not be such a long cul-de-sac, she understands that the length of the cul-de-sac of Wall Street is beyond the City's control in light of Burnsville's decision not to connect 125th Street with Wall (097 Page 18 March 28, 1995 ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION Street. Member Carlson further inquired with the applicant as to why Whispering Way was not connected to Wall Street as a through street. Mr. Huila explained that the grade at that location was too steep to allow a through street and that there would be more damage to the land if the street was put through. Mr. Huila noted that the existing retaining wall on Wall Street shows the steepness of the grade. In response to Chairman Miller's inquiry, Mr. Hilla stated that the development is still dealing with problems of trespass and vandalism. Member Hey!moved, Segal seconded a motion to recommend approval of a Rezoning of 20.97 acres from A (Agricultural) to R-1 (Single Family). All approved in favor. Member Heyl moved, Segal seconded a motion to recommend approval of a Preliminary Subdivision(Whispering Woods Eleventh Addition) of 20.97 acres and 49 single family lots and setback Variances located in the SW% of Section 31 on the west side of Slater Road, subject to the following conditions: Standard Conditions 1. The developer shall comply with these standard conditions of plat approval as adopted by Council on February 3, 1993: AI, B1, B3, Cl, C2, C4, El, Fl, G1, &Hl. 'Cul-de-Sac Variances: 2. Variances to the maximum cul-de-sac length shall be approved as follows: Wall Street= 1,396' variance of 896'. Whispering Way=749' variance of 249'. Estates Drive=568' variance of 68'. Park and Recreation: 3. The proposed development shall be subject to a cash parks and cash trails dedication. 4. The tree preservation should be approved as submitted. Water Quality: 5. A detention basin be constructed to catch and treat runoff prior to discharge to Pond E-23. Page 19 March 28, 1995 ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION 6. A cash dedication for water quality be required for the remainder of the site. Wetlands: 7. No filling or draining of wetland areas be allowed. Grading: 8. The final grading plan shall show detailed plans and specification of the construction of the retaining wall. Tree Preservation: 9. This development will require that Tree Protective Measures (i.e. 4' polyethylene laminate safety netting be installed at the Drip Line or at the perimeter of the Critical Root Zone, whichever is greater, of the significant woodlands to be preserved. 10. To record that Individual Lot - Tree Preservation Plans be required on all lots within the development at the time of building. 11. The developer shall be required to contact the City Forestry Division at least five days prior to the issuance of a grading permit to ensure compliance with the approved Tree Preservation Plan. 12. Subject to final plat approval. 13. Approval of setback variances. All approved in favor. ( [3 sx PLANNING REPORT CITY OF EAGAN REPORT DATE: March 21, 1995 CASE: 31-RZ-2-2-95 31-PP-2-2-95 APPLICANT: Hilla Incorporated HEARING DATE: March 28, 1995 PROPERTY OWNER: Donald Hilla PREPARED BY: Shannon Tyree REQUEST: Rezoning & Preliminary Subdivision LOCATION: SW 1/4 of the SW 1/4 of Section 31. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: D-1 Single Family (0-3 units per acre) ZONING: A- Agricultural SUMMARY OF REQUEST: Hilla Incorporated is requesting a Rezoning of 20.97 acres from A (Agricultural) to R-1 (Single Family) and a Preliminary Subdivision (Whispering Woods Eleventh Addition) of 49 single family lots on 20.97 acres; and 10' setback Variances on Lots 1,2, 9, 10, 18, 19,20, 30, 31, 32 41,42, and 43 located on the west side of Slater Road, in the SW1/4 of Section 31 AUTHORITY FOR REVIEW: Rezoning: Chapter 11.40. Subd.5.E. states that 'The Council shall not rezone any land or area in any zoning district or make any other proposed amendment without first having referred it to the Planning Commission for its consideration and recommendation" Subdivision: City Code Section 13.20 Subd. 6 states that "In the case of platting, the Planning Commission and the Council shall be guided by criteria, including the following, in approving, denying or establishing conditions related thereto:" A. That the proposed subdivision does comply with applicable City Code provisions and the Comprehensive Guide Plan. B. That the design or improvement of the proposed subdivision complies with applicable plans of Dakota County, State of Minnesota, or the Metropolitan Council. / F(( Whispering Woods Eleventh Addition - Planning Report March 28, 1995 Page 2 C. That the physical characteristics of the site including but not limited to,topography, vegetation, susceptibility to erosion and siltation, susceptibility to flooding, water storage, and retention are such that the site is suitable for the type of development or use contemplated. D. That the site physically is suitable for the proposed density of the development. E. That the design of the subdivision or the proposed improvements is not likely to cause environmental damage." F. That the design of the subdivision or the type of improvements is not likely to cause health problems. G. That the design of the subdivision or the improvements will not conflict with easements of record or with easements established by judgement of court. H. That completion of the proposed development of the subdivision can be completed in a timely manner so as not to cause an economic burden upon the City for maintenance, repayment of bonds or similar burden. L That the subdivision has been properly planned for possible solar energy system use within the subdivision or as it relates to adjacent property. (Refer to City Handbook on Solar Access). J. That the design of public improvements for the subdivision is compatible and consistent with the platting or approved preliminary plat on adjacent lands. K That the subdivision is in compliance with those standards set forth in that certain document entitled"City of Eagan Water Quality Management Plan for the Gun Club Lake Watershed Management Organization"which document is properly approved and filed with the office of the City Clerk hereinafter referred to as the "Water Quality Management Plan". Said document and'all of the notations,references and other information contained therein shall have the same force and effect as if fully set down herein and is hereby made a part of this Chapter by reference and incorporated herein as fully as if set forth herein at length. It shall be the responsibility of the City Clerk to maintain the Water Quality Management Plan and make the same available to the public. BACKGROUND/HISTORY: The property has been owned by Donald Hilla since 1970. The Eleventh Addition (49 lots) is the last proposal of a series of subdivisions that has developed 112 lots to date. A concept plan was submitted for the City of Eagan's review; at that time, the developer had provided an overall "master plan"for the area to show how the entire area would be developed. ) Whispering Woods Eleventh Addition - Planning Report March 28, 1995 Page 3 In the original plan, 125th street (Wall Street) showed a connection to Burnsville. The Burnsville plat was designed and constructed that way. Recently,the Burnsville City Council has accepted and approved a petition by the local Burnsville residents to not connect the road and two cities at 125th street (Wall Street). Burnsville is now in the process of approving the street reconstruction plan that would remove the road segment to Eagan. As a result,Wall Street will now become a long cul-de- sac. EXISTING CONDITIONS:The site is characterized by rolling hills that are heavily wooded. The site has 90 feet of elevation difference from the southern portion of the site to the pond on the north edge of the site. The Whispering Woods area was not cleared of trees by the previous landowners. COMPATIBILITY WITH SURROUNDING AREA: Rezoning the area to single family will be consistent with not only the City's Comprehensive Guide Plan, and as the final piece of property to develop it will be consistent with the way the entire area has developed. SURROUNDING USES; The following existing uses,zoning,and comprehensive guide plan designations surround the subject property: North- Whispering Woods Ninth Addition; zoned R-1; designated D-1. South - City of Burnsville; zoned R-1; designated D-1. East - Whispering Woods 10th Addition, Slater Road, and Cedar Heights Addition; zoned R-1; designated D-1. West - City of Burnsville; zoned R-1; designated D-1. EVALUATION OF REQUEST: Introduction. The 49 single family lots are being proposed in phases; all of the Whispering Woods development to date has been done this way. The first phase includes the continuation of Wall Street and the development of 14 lots. Phase 2 is the development of Jamie Rose Court and eight lots. Phase 3 is the largest phase with the final construction of 27 lots. Rezoning. The proposed rezoning from A (Agricultural) to R-1 (single family) will be compatible with the City's Comprehensive Guide Plan and the surrounding land use of single family. Preliminary Subdivision. Density-The gross density is 2.34 units/acre and the net density is 2.74 units/acre. 6 Whispering Woods Eleventh Addition - Planning Report March 28, 1995 • Page 4 Lots -The proposed development consists of 49 lots. The largest lot is 36,262 s.£ and the smallest lot is 12,105 s.f. Average lot size of the development is 15,883 s.£ Setbacks - The developer is requesting setback variances of 10' on Lots 1, 2, 9, 10, 19, 20, 30,31,32,41,42, and 43 to save trees, especially in the rear portion of the lots. In addition, there are steep slopes which make the development of these lots more difficult. Tree Preservation-The tree preservation plan as submitted is acceptable. It indicates the existence of 926 significant trees within the area to be developed. Tree species identified area comprised of 87% oak trees (bur,white, and red oaks) ranging in diameter from 8" to 23",with an average diameter of approximately 20"; and 13%black cherry trees ranging in diameter from 8" to 23", with an average diameter of about 10". The significant trees are evenly distributed throughout the site. Initial site development will result in the removal of 222 significant trees or 24% of the total. 'This tree removal will specifically take place during the construction of the four streets and associated cul-de-sacs within the development. In addition some tree removal will also take place as soil is removed from lots adjacent to the cul-de-sac/street area in attempts to develop both a buildable house lot and more level street surface. The developer has indicated to staff that the proposed tree removal is a "worst case scenario" and that possibly fewer trees will be removed if fill becomes available from an alternate source other than within the development area. Decisions will also be made in the field as the developer grades the site for street/cul-de-sac installation which could result in the preservation of trees. The developer has also made an attempt to preserve trees in common areas along streets and lot lines to preserve the "wooded" feel of the site. These , preserved trees will be protected with the installation of protective fencing. Allowable significant tree removal during initial development for this type of proposal is 25%of the existing tree resource,therefore,with a 24%actual removal,there is no required tree replacement. The developer has estimated that during the development of all the individual lots an additional 22% of the remaining significant tree resource will be removed. Allowable•tree removal during the development of these individual lots will be 20%. • Grading - The preliminary grading plan is acceptable and the development has tried to minimise the removal of trees. According to the preliminary grading plan, the developer plans to save trees in the backyard areas of the site. As shown on the grading plan, emergency overland drainage swales shall be provided along the lot lines to allow for surface water drainage from low points in the streets. 7 ,7 Whispering Woods Eleventh Addition - Planning Report March 28, 1995 Page 5 Approximately 14 acres of this 21 acre site will be affected to prepare this site for the buildings and street construction. The maximum cuts shown are 16 feet and the maximum fills are 10' . There is an existing retaining wall that is located along the south side of Wall Street. The retaining wall is 10- 15'high and was built with concrete modular block. The wall contains three tiers and is located on private property in the backyards of proposed Lots 32 and 33 of Block 1. The preliminary grading plan shows that a retaining wall will be constructed by the builder in the backyard areas of Lots 19 and 20 of Block 1. The retaining wall will allow for a flat area to be graded behind the house. The final grading plan must show detailed plans and specifications of the construction of the retaining walls. This development will be responsible for installing and maintaining erosion control measures in accordance with the City's Erosion/Sediment Control Manual standards. Special care will be needed to prevent erosion off of this site into the adjacent trees and wetland areas that are to be saved. Storm Drainage/Water Ouality - This development is located near the watershed divide between the Gun Club Watershed District and the Blackdog Watershed District boundaries. The preliminary drainage plan shows that storm water runoff from the backyards of Lots 23 through 31 of Block 1 will drain to Pond AP-34.3 (Wetland Area A). This pond was constructed with the Whispering Woods 10th Addition. The outlot for this pond drains in an easterly direction across Slater Road and eventually discharges into Pond AP-34 which is a high priority Class 2 water body in the City of Eagan. The rest of this site will drain into Burnsville's Ponds E-24 and E-23. The City of Burnsville purchased the property encompassing these two ponds to handle storm water runoff from their community. Wetlands-Three wetlands exist on site. All are associated with stormwater ponding areas, and no wetland draining or filling is proposed. Utilities - The preliminary utility layout as presented is acceptable. Sanitary sewer of sufficient size, capacity and depth is readily available to serve this site from an existing 8" line that flows easterly along Wall Street. The preliminary utility plan shows that an 8" sanitary sewer line will be extended throughout the site to serve the proposed lots of this development. Watermain of sufficient size,pressure and capacity is also readily available to serve this site from an existing 6"wtermain that is located in Wall Street and from a 6"watermain located ( fi Whispering Woods Eleventh Addition - Planning Report March 28, 1995 Page 6 in Estates Drive. The watermain layout includes a loop from Wall Street to Estates Drive that follows the street named Whispering Way. The City of Burnsville and the City of Eagan are studying if the two cities should interconnect their water main systems. The interconnecting systems would be beneficial in emergency situations, but water towers in the two cities operate at different elevations. The Safari storage reservoir in Eagan operates with a high water level at 1150. The Tuxedo Storage Reservoir in Burnsville operates with a high water level at 1105. Therefore, if the two cities decide to interconnect water systems, a pressure reducing station would need to be added. Street Design/Access-The preliminary street design and driveway layout is acceptable with minor modifications. Street access is readily available to serve this site from Slater Road to the east, Wall Street to the north and Estates Drive to the south. The final plat for Whispering Woods 10th Addition was approved by the City Council at the February 21, 1995 meeting. The 10th Addition includes the construction of Slater Road from Storland Road to the south to connect to Burnsville Parkway at the Burnsville/Eagan corporate boundary line. Slater Road will be a 36'wide street with a concrete walk located along the west right- of-way line. Earlier layouts of this development included another connection to Burnsville at 125th Street. However, the City of Burnsville has decided to remove the stub street portion of 125th Street that this development would connect to. Therefore, the street layout now for Wall Street shows a cul-de-sac to be constructed at the southwesterly terminus. Easements/Right-of-Way/Permits - This development will be responsible for providing drainage and utility easements over the wetland/water quality ponds up to 3'above the high water level. This development will be responsible for obtaining all regulatory agency permits such as MPCA, MCWS, MN Department of Health, City of Burnsville, etc.,prior to final plat approval. Parks and Recreation. The development will be subject to a cash parks and cash trail dedication. SUMMARY/CONCLUSION: The proposed applications for Rezoning and Subdivision are consistent with the City's Comprehensive Guide Plan for development in that section of Eagan. The proposed Subdivision appears to meet the findings required for subdivision approval ACTIONS TO BE CONSIDERED: To recommend approval/denial of the requested rezoning from A (Agricultural) to R-1 (Single Family) of 20.97 acres. Whispering Woods Eleventh Addition - Planning Report March 28, 1995 Page 7 • To recommend approval/denial of the requested preliminary plat of 49 single family lots. If approval of the plat is recommended it shall be subject to the following conditions: ,Standard Conditions 1. The developer shall comply with these standard conditions of plat approval as adopted by Council on February 3, 1993: AI, Bi, B3, Cl, C2, C4, El, Fl, Gi, & Hl. Cul-de-Sac Variances: 2. Variances to the maximum cul-de-sac length shall be approved as follows: Wall Street = 1,396' variance of 896'. Whispering Way = 749' variance of 249'. Estates Drive = 568' variance of 68'. Park and Recreation: 3. The proposed development shall be subject to a cash parks and cash trails dedication. 4. The tree preservation should be approved as submitted. Water Ouality: 5. A detention basin be constructed to catch and treat runoff prior to discharge to Pond E-23. 6. A cash dedication for water quality be required for the remainder of the site. Wetlands; 7. No filling or draining of wetland areas be allowed. Grading: 8. The final grading plan shall show detailed plans and specification of the construction of the retaining wall. Tree Preservation; 9. This development will require that Tree Protective Measures (i.e. 4' polyethylene laminate safety netting be installed at the Drip Line or at the perimeter of the Critical Root Zone, whichever is greater, of the significant woodlands to be preserved. ? 0 Whispering Woods Eleventh Addition- Planning Report March 28, 1995 Page 8 10. To record that Individual Lot-Tree Preservation Plans be required on all lots within the development at the time of building. 11. The developer shall be required to contact the City Forestry Division at least five days prior to the issuance of a grading permit to ensure compliance with the approved Tree Preservation Plan. • • STANDARD CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL A. .F InanclaI Obligations 1. This development shall accept its additional financial obligations as defined In the staff's report in accordance with the final plat dimensions and the rates in effect at the time of final plat approval.• B. Easements and Rights-of-Way 1. This development shall dedicate 10-foot drainage and utility easements centered over all lot lines and, in addition, where necessary to accommodate existing or proposed utilities for drainage ways within the plat. The development shall dedicate easements of sufficient width and location as determined necessary by engineering standards. 2. This development shall dedicate, provide, or financially guarantee the acquisition costs of drainage;ponding, and utility easements in addition to public street rights-of-way as required by the alignment, depth, and storage -capacity of all required public utilities and streets located beyond the boundaries of this plat as necessary to service or accommodate this • development. 3. • This development shall dedicate all public right-of-way and temporary slope easements for ultimate development of adjacent roadways as required by the appropriate jurisdictional agency. 4. This development shall dedicate adequate drainage and ponding easements • to incorporate the required high water elevation plus three (3) feet as necessitated by storm water storage volume requirements. C. Plans and Specifications • 1. All public and private streets, drainage systems and utilities necessary to provide service to this development shall be designed and certified by a registered professional engineer in accordance with City adopted codes, engineering standards, guidelines and policies prior to application for final plat approval. 2. A detailed grading, drainage, erosion, and sediment control plan must be prepared in accordance with current City standards prior to final plat approval. 3. This development shall ensure that all dead-end public streets shall have a cul-de-sac constructed in accordance with City engineering standards. /. ?al- • • 4. A separate detailed landscape plan shall be submitted overlaid on the proposed grading and utility plan. The financial guarantee for such plan shall be included in the Development Contract and shall not be released until one year after the date of City certified compliance. D. public improvements .1. If any improvements are to be installed under a City contract, the appropriate project must be approved by Council action prior to final plat approval. E. pmAta 1. This development shall be responsible for the acquisition of all regulatory agency permits required by the affected agency prior to final plat approval. F. Parks and Trails Dedication 1. This development shall fulfill its park and trail dedication requirements as recommended by the Advisory Parks, Recreation and Natural Resource Commission and approved by Council action. G. Water Quality Dedication 1. This development shall be responsible for providing a cash dedication, ponding, or a combination thereof in accordance with the criteria identified in the City's Water Quality Management Plan, as recommended by the Advisory Parks, Recreation and Natural Resource Commission and approved by Council action. H. Ati er 1. All subdivision,zoning and other ordinances affecting this development shall be adhered to, unless specifically granted a variance by Council action. Advisory Planning Commission City Council - Approved: August 25. 1997 September 15. 1997 • Revised: _ July 10. 1990 Revised: _February 2. 1993 LTS#5 STANDARD.CON • • FINANCIAL OBLIGATION - Whispering Woods Eleventh There are pay-off balances of special assessments totaling SO on the parcels proposed for platting. The pay-off balance will be allocated to the lots created by the plat. At this time, there are no pending assessments on the parcel proposed for platting. The estimated financial obligation presented is subject to change based upon areas, dimensions and land uses contained in the final plat. Based upon the study of the financial obligations collected in the past and the uses proposed for the property, the following charges are proposed. The charges are computed using the City's existing fee schedule and the connections proposed to be made to the City's utility system based on the submitted plans. Improvement Use Rate Quantity Amount Storm Sewer Trunk S.F. • 5.076/sq ft 777,524 sq ft 559.092 Total S5 • 7 • ....:,--.,7;.1,.. 4:........ E r. :::.,(.....t.„€,.. ,..., . • " it .. .• .i . .„....he •..,. ftt 7:f.'-i.:II I (..t• .-.,-, ..! fkgh .:,•i k...,— 4/ .. 4 .. \. vill:....; iic 4/,. ... ..-01.s--.-,,Voii . - .-.. . . .g....H., _ pr..,7tht , .... .,--,...... „vs_ • 11T1 i ) I$it■.�'„•a m11 •1','• . '..:;i•-.. iii < , ', . '•�1 t�t�• 4 hl' r a :r. 1 sti Al « 'E�1i"� fin 1-' • �•� ....) dt"E k,J1i 1,... !43'`a i•J1•t:' ;. • . .-, ' tKa,�, ..---,,,,,:c.: r '� {Y ',. " �' ,,vet :i ' . • >. "`- �i a-_ 1 • • 11 ;�.: i.Pww Al. 57r r. l g E , 111:1 ,-- v. .1,_ .Zi:t'f::-!f•;_t.,,•:, a• ;r.4-. , , . . • -kerjr.v...:;:- .,.. ..i 4 I- > :: L-• (1151111..° - i' �- yYir.o. b'u I F:I IBIl1 %;;@ , ., 1 •, 1... 7:14k;101. 111: :•t�9 r s ), •f �: .�` Y_t71sp. /W • 7, i 1 f._717:`•..%11 r a * 1• •arc, :.,A. :nor. 1;1 7• 1. %!V wIn1 l_ -,-1--. :_ t:11) 1' „`cr,:;rc-. "i vC , ! �..' fir. _ J.. € `rs�id. . .✓`• twit '• ['�7 ,. i!!� id �1��y� 211 !'tlf E + 8„0,-)6_,..=.' � TRW ti I • �• +j•IM �l 11 I _i y-. ` '^� I '1 i.::41� 'uj ' • t , a `•:: ,,TG5-_v -1 „ .:,Joy I.i^..�' 'livi -, � !_ ''„Ld r: , y-°.: II la- ,L,1'►emu'Iv,t tt I • ... 7. 1 H .1 1__ •• S N m 1 '•',� 3• HASNl1119 • v 4§x Qs c J t/;.t-h,• ` ` ^any - `'4) 6 - 1 \ 33 3 - f --1 < .2 1\ r 3 '1%,u N •J NI,wMi A 4 1 ' iir w' ��� :r t. ® Q Ij l -. ��— rw~ i1j. 1.:)1, 7 1/i ,1f1 �\ 1-? • 1 7!i--_•7j 1,,-. '� yil awn Ina J:fE ^�� i �s qii I�u `•'V' 1, 4 7n+ o �/��\••L.:'• / ; - G1 1 t�. �1 1 ' `'/s7 �� ! I lT is 04'1 1,'i S. .....• ” 1�L.' _ �"•' �-.. �N1 L:.'aJ B. —l , \ / .�i--mt.': / 11'i. •;. 2 �{I „1 N IY 4 \, - i` i 41 m 4 ... .111.11...1.....-...: V ..: .0. ..1. • I _ "V . 10;1 I( (.77— ID ■ t,\. s,o i!n .1 s. aw„nc 7� �-_. __d___...,�_ c�=j A • T =q"1 t... • �'• fiat • • ..... II k. -' 1 I,:rio c� `/ � ~M r ( • + ..j l ^� E r�` a tiw ;0 I O milmummina. N - to- \.4N / CD t . . ___. _.______ • • lq )------- . . . .a +Z' _•u-r-t r. ._.....tea ..._•..... - _ . - ..y -.r...... -- -- . A .14 / — 41---sad4 lS.rii-. : e. 7 Lii, n.,1111111.11110 - INNI 4p,::AltiWii. .I 1 'Agi:, ,-..„,7„..,.. .d ...__=_..., 0, ..ii,4x.,... .iwi:.:,..,-i. . s .. . ._.4.,.(;\ , cr.. ....,...1c.,...,,I,_.:r„:_,%,, ,... _..1.,......m,1/4, !„e.., ; -- Ilk-;..„.ig:.. .„..,.,,..: . 11- ---14-4„..)..?.1. 10:1;1:: '"-::itii--(,. _ it ."-14.-:;-.1:-.;,:c . • ii _1� Iii;..l n• •- '' ^ .•IIIIY • • 1"1 ssti'� iimiL--. - k it,••.(• '` =_a••••' ...i,.........1.:. III Is) 4i•. .,.",..„.....,,, __, : . ,,, i -1,8, mu' j '......'ff.F:iti . • t3‘.1'3=H.,6. ,_ .....3, k....., ■ .5.trl , .*:.„. ._.......r. k, :.." i', ••5'''' ..,,. --; - 102..-; •v".. ., 11001 ---qk N cr 6- _ - .:. triljtelitUA + Ir . - .� ... . ;. 1 1 „ �.... I ;•' • i .T ,1 _. ., , .. . , ..>..... , • ....... . ”. . . . , 1 t � �, • I I , 1 1 tip t• • . . _ . •_. •TOTAL OF AS LOTS M r •fir WHISPERING M �IIOODS 7r•,afal I. r LOU. 831.7N..n.-7m �p.f11'�� 1 U.171. i u vi.i •IaI�. ;FE a �::.R M: ;w::,:::�1a E� O ELEVENTH ADDITION OVUM IV-.R I. 83.1•.. r+a I•r.R1 4•-83 In V.R 1. 71.183.. y I •� _ �w was.• 71LL1!1f171• 11.183.IV ; r. Oam. 31 ;� 7.111 1. ti`+ c�nwa'"LOS WI. � 1 '� •_y� __�T � � � UM.mnrlR Ii al", 12=a.•r7atnrL t -Iw '�ip�, . P I f•I ram, - r — YpT ul..RI G•iCT.�.�'�',C���:!•w�_3CLS..• 4•Ci �` 7rw1.. �' r+. �I`�� ' r4ra 1 _ `� �`.\ 701 17.•1 ..A { 'i1Fi•�.L•�t'�� •1n�•n11.sl R.fH.f• { , �7T�����..T�.,.`.�f r.IN . .O .1 II.1r..}1 + _6UI 83.RI ` '� 1_7• Ri*4Et r ..1. ` M.711.I IR M.RI I..r7.I .1}.f •a Etrar--•=;rat j.. r yaQ� .r.. _ .��r r.M► ` •... N.I•.. LIT r.RI • 7.1, 4�-�TpA-:2, i G F I y i r.w.7r `� r _:itir3yLr -r •A r • .� \' O +�r7 `. _ u17.R7 al E''+- silly 1 II I 17.471.. I t `-IG.-.174.7==.'" '''' ■ �Mir �..�1>-��3�• �1�l •LZ�S" I'! cl�7• •.r1 . a 1 . 1 ' •• IR M. i • 8w. • 83.1•. C I I I° 17.0.7 i ` a.m.sr w.•.111 mat.. ,ry• SWAPS SCAM N.up r.•I 1 I w 1rr:i.v.w. '`� •'�C{'�t w v�rs¢.�.�� ,_ ( �l 'u.rl . •• — R ,... �• S„ .�.1 •r l0i.m.I jirs. 'ii 11831:al'• ,. .tl It1�. .ft • •. L1• RE(.( c &JVEVMAR2•I9fl5 • ,. (q • Iry~� I ♦iOJ�'.'IW•IWDV •,�•00Q-1•' '` ��wM I sstRO ,..x«. w. w •��/��$QOONIH1�1 tfAS V1053ti1 DN�81'd NOG '.:1�«HiV...w�..nr '1 i ►avid JNI213�NIJN� S(1JiAN =�"" ww.t w.ry .. -- N Cam © r g ! @A 0 F. 6''''' ' 1 :7), " _A! 0 1=. E i A ::.: wec u4uxiq 1 �[t��yt Q r.Ta `1Mb1 Y01 n^ Q.�M� mJ7.�s G��stir to g< t m •N s! J ! P d ,4L\/ A =._- ,....:-.5.- -•=3-_-,--0:01-1_, ‘ ;: ,F.,,e, t4 . e 19.1 //''' 7NriCtr. Iiir*-41 .,.._ -4„ 0,1 ar6 o..\!; Ili 44,'40.411.10*1 _ 1.74, . _ / /2it.* 4.. vii..... _ .4111111‘. _...mmi.,,, IV ot ..r . fl i ..,0 ,o, , i .i.jOr_ r Q�. • i. ,.�-,.Vim. - ��; r t �It 3. AMi - - AtINV,,, . ..441ii,� C)16f6 111014� 4141 A Aft A... �' = /^�%� • :rm�����TT,��,;,i "jam 5 ret_ -) V g ini 1 SRS ? '/ �I ,�.- r .,fit' '# �► _'J irk' �.- )6. : ; :..c(74VIVIII W!-. 1A71Ciartpleghti CO' ., . 7 151(tiork.°4' 1,ein.t.• 5 / ,/ leo, ;, . ,:eir - 7'D`� /�\�k•_' `` [ 111411 �1-, art• Q IIi!',rl // —�� yhi � ice• a�raj ..',7. ' ; ; -.)-,,...:----.Airri g 1 2wa f lealt. 1„01,,,. ,,,q,gm , A.,,,,,:, „..., 4,4terty:iillhli IIM iE� ��k Ii 1�9; 1'� iii prIO;i 31112 1 s bit/*11 1 /10 is� °� 'ilIh'tiIjJ '11'131 it, / '. �• '�•.\ 4��• ��i 0 _- .� \"Al_heal Ai Sinkild 49 g -":„ . z' • r r • r . Z N .! 1'�J_� it _ -- 1I [ g r.:4,,,, ..., ..,....6.0),f3___...moat:IL, . aireilla.... 7 Mil I iii q g :► . M •� '1 i.-. = • 91 �" I . /9 7 . . , • • r.r «I ,«I Ina.«I ILiJ.f In L«I II._ f CITY OF 'r` I*4•*10 BURNSVILLE POND E23 In..an ..��.. . 1.'.w.a r.w.r {.—..---_r• r• i, {A.at -- •\ Ian a,OKI P . wall.r O TatWHISPERING MOODS 1 :1�: �'«;.: + R UTWTY PLAN Ian a.An r.w.! / YI I/.«I • .€A• Y r.wi s .u.r m n.Ma ` i ‘Is M.IM,f y;t. + CITY OF II 4 nao± �• a.LW+•*a.n• BURNSVILLE WAur r.rl g '��. .r ; gg .,.. ..�;,, ; POND E24 1 {i Cl _• • In M.a0 •••�•M ,\ .) 1aL M.•111 IR M.um , Y1 N.WI r.rl.f 1n I.«.. ■ 77.416.f a.w.it 'SAW •V �Ir I.II f •w j� Pi u.e. • O �.° -p In a.rl In r.am •O ! • a.r r ` LW re.a I In«.RI 1: In r.an Wall,a . C I MOP.f wit W.an u r.w >n r. MU'l�lrt In1wn r.4.I i ••�;, w.w.r a.an r • a.le.f .rr. ` an.Tar r�i _ . A wrr /y WANK iCN.E iar a.rl .. .silt=�' , ,Ira it 9 • ~ `tI u A.«I Ie.lr.r ISTERING VAT - �.. 4 or 1 man f ,1 tar r.*1 L f1f Wi lR:1,� ....• �S'` a.ur.f ��+e �Z 's ri In a.7777 urr.la�• a.nl.r lal r rl ul a«1 u r.an r.ne.r 'A arrla w•.. F n.ri.r TA:f w�II.f Im n.rl %At . u.rr.f O R aria. I;u Aik • • I aY OI Ai,, 2 I IVHIOSPE°OG�JG WOODS . e C• „1 :1 okiiiip. . 3 ' ELEVENTH ADDOITOON ,Imp CONCEPT PLAN - 313 14 8 6 5•' 1 4 1 / 27 m tD O VOW a WALE uEJ sus r+s sss 1 26 -d 9 tv p 0 £ a VI �S I 24 0 ' ' mi. �n ,ran®® �s .li 111 117. 6 I jaw: roHU5 us Wei,�' ® ice' e• \��. 1,1.T 411PINFIRP***viii*), fill N. 1 - 0,,.. 4,4,, ili .10 • r \` ....` Rao.3Ae L1 NI711 7•4rt•fielipprib,,- 'It+4'4P.�'p+per A� �- I�,IIM. C 01 I T• ADD.T1 g r I, =AMU/ y'C� MU rl arI cg • m 1135.17M7 w.rlc,rei" noon tau • 71 , , •. ---. - - • - - . i . - • • •'!' q 6,0;,, : iv a so '• c -mak- ''"41 n*., ' 1 ial 4.ILI .L...7/4 .sitiz-.1--.2_ ,,,ttr r,7-?-4,A2e js., litIRE IT(-) 7 PBO a WE NORM I ' .7. PIK.AraEOATIONam....TA; mow? rier,4/"A lp. Lir P. M. lit .:f----111—. p...„,.4.4744 ...,..... 4 iir tk 44441,_ ':.11. - .""-- 41. 341\t"Al5V • LEVerili AD MOH , iss,-----t:±3 ■ ILO t , 1 irwaTzutttlist.71 0,0,410 .4 re1 il:1, .EVInEEMISPErsaisallIPLIPANNyWADTioNOODS 1 ilkiii . - - , ., ',it ......:41CI .. ••• •■ • • • HI iri 40,0 I t7.413°. u•!Ve I Ili , • -a .• •0... '"*. --•=u. 1.14;10Fr ..v,. e er.,...r - __.2„,....,,r 6...,„Th-t.,41e-4Ir .11/ i it\ ---- VI . 011 7,7-Arie i: g 1 v .Valr-V.tii, !eV:leg/ ••: ....- 0. : 11 1 wowszerzz .4 i*-51744 .'7e'r-ry Tr: .11/ ;4,7 2 i 1•-— ill t4 1[5 •=1..1, ,. IN• ireFmairmaff Eit -,'.;:r A-10A-f,rfea,.. ...,.e. .ee./ #4,1■41_6... :.„,;*.ils 0 - - _.--:.. -- .. .... — . ''- imit'l•-trA Air ti 4'0 T'''e‘T,ii Xic-d•41"...;:ir-7ArIAIWI"."-- anon&mr“FtEcTEN , gi'firt$11Ff..'r a&P.7..17: 47,---:-...-4■1/ -.3.4-.44-4.. ...4.04?'.„. ,Aill - ::::: i! • --ifi-Ak; iir: ••-- 144(tcp,t,r,:rjAr r 4e410 m.-'1‘ IC ' A-ri:- '—gltAlgr 14:•• etl?.e-Ji Pl_11-41 ' FAM gykik illti _am 11 .1 ''' 1114010#'2410115t 41$P. .tvg.--"IINICT,IT I: 0 .4 _„r_..4-r-A4.4.410;•50'"'-..v. k-.9;44, .... L.'ri.'' ?Will a=-041. Z . AT 11704 FjOrrer .41.7.4P411d0.11 ,": CIIK-.44'I" ,„,,01,,,,,. r or.g,-_4-48 ■z.1.--4,t, :-''.No ' , ---- .11:14341-7,4'--I"- 111APHIC SCALE "Z.7 g:f4A torer■#47{‘,.,"*. IIPPIfffillif '` -i-2-Nitgani 44. IA • " 0 i 1 '•-„g0,00/ A ir4-‘&11-4.1ClifilA ._ . p„4 maingumi 0 : .‘m.s.t.r,Arv,,,,--Af■-4., 1,`tt4-1-.e.' , .1e, ik,'Vt ),..,iir. ". BENcef NARK . I • ib ri rj frtirik.1 oli.ofteztir-iz ......:7,„...-/- .,.....4.4.-.,,.. lif Lui".trklgif-.F ... fftwimb Orsti, 4*A' '".= %.1.144 ra 417" merhat---------" ww+trAu + AlfararApiop- *he of 1%, ....• ., ;-- ,.. 1 • ••,•,IlEgts.o:',..i.0, g. le I I r 4rillgPw '79! ' -11""7"" ',IL am gr.P.'''' • " 1 ' :=„•,--- -,....--:---,412'••p.',... -..• &um 110TECIIPI 3 L I I sc:11410 PIOTECID1 .n• 4I- 4t•2 .L-1. .--.1,__. . . . • • • e m..7.......,.... - IROLIO10.1 RAT POI r . ---.----- Zi::V:f:::::":*;iii::::•■•:.:i''....:•'A„,iliiii;11:::ggrai:V•iii. :........!!!*1. wFISPEFthIG WOODS 1 - -.............A.:::-i'. ;':iiii:::r:::Sit.:&:::4ti:::::..a:3:44iiiii:::•:.::..ii,ii::::.:, azygpiTH ADDMON T\ -.,4.To..T.AL.OF 411.L13::., „I:am i ligfil7ii:fiAti 0.0t1.616.. ac...g.:::: i /4;3&41.11, im.a n..110 99.2.: "anti . k„:":::::..'iftliiii. :..;:.:LL....:;i:::i.iiiiff:if i ■'.■iiiiiiiii;:::: iP..iiii.&• :::::::").::._.,:.1"..lilliZ:::1"iii =Tn.'.:::::2::::. , .„,......,,..,,,:::-.-- "Ni.::::::":::::;;:if:igtiKtiii.Kil . II . I Ulf lop MOIL V ! k‘.. ..5 .±..r._.__,......„ .....:;.:_:::iiii.:::t.2.,v,..:::::::::::::::: .,. .....:..w1:::.....:::::::::, • .., 1.412m244...-......,u,...,,,-.- itikNi...:.tvz:. ,..mr...0.::::*?....it. ' """' kira=l';mu"."'' 6' s:•''t,._'%•••'......:::••••:::::::ff:::::::;:::§:;;:il..::::.:KI:K:K::*::: ...'.':•--:" . • 1 2 - „::.::: litil3t.P:W.P.K.: 11:: lk.:-4154N.4 g. 4:::::*.%•;,:iii:,., Ak3\k1/4, . :".1!:::::::!..i.....;:e.:. ....N........-‘,... ..!!!:111.::: ';'::::.;;;;I::::::::::.::.::,::::1:* ”':. :... •. .::::::::;:a..-:::::::::::.:..:.:..:,- ....,......:)::::.:$ :::::Iig"-::.:...*:..;-:.._-........ . .•• .,w ,.. , 11 1 ki;::::::::::Z:\ : . ..... •.........,444•Y$4,. •:•:,4.%%4:4.4. 4444;•:.:::::.'..w.40:•.% ••'•'.'''''''.:••.":":''''''.*:•PA.:4,':•'' 4;:tie :4,4.4444.•:4. :444.4444. . :. S•iii:41::Ki.g.':.:•::::::•:4:: • *st, "'•-- j.:.'Pl.:.:i:'..11,41.24;L:...V''''k4W,..."%:;:fte#,„*::::11:.iil.:.......!. .f:;:i.:Ig:.-.:.iiiiiIii:iiiii;:ll••'..iitn1::4'::":::.11:g1111111;i::•:1.: te li,- ''' 0:11 rimiciAL oeuamioN. •'''':4•;.::::•:•*:•;':::•Af:' ''. S.r1::::::::.%11;:;:::11%:11.::::111.4.1.::: .......;14 ini;...:.::.iii..ii:iiiii?..f.iiiiii ig..:;::::::K: r''r.7- la t LEGEND . I •••:::::::::::;•:::KiiK::::: ....:4,::::::::::::'::::::::::::::::::::•:::.• '''.• ■ . ; — ;4.::::''''...*:'::: 461 okitk, 101111111.1,:i: .14.,.,....„ ""%:-::::.:ft.41:::•:.... t. _, ; f:iiiiii.§:i1;::1:1;::1:1•:,..: , i::•:-.:4,.:•:..:...• -ak... , •••••.1....„„Nte,j,ma go 0 •4. 1.I•,;.4.E:V:::i::_Vg-1::-::.'.i:*rM„..-ef,-l.I:li*.....r.,::::ii::i::i.:i:i::K:i::-i::it:i.:i:li::iI•:.1.!,: I 3 i 1 1t:0 :'::\::y.. N. \,,..d‘. ,‘:.•..i:1ii4iil.i:0:::::M::i:::zi,-.1•1:::.::::::-:t"::::::::§t1illiliiiitiiii'ii.i:i i: ..r7",,:f,.',1...‘.0,k t p S.A`C e. t•<*'1w 41V:::-?::•:::.:::0 tp' storm sear Tuk ia 14 "1 \ 11 i I,iim.in:.:.:::::.e.iiiii; , „.::::::.44:::::•;::::?:::::m:We..::::::::....::.:.•,,,%, .,;:iiiiii:::.,,ii:...:;;Ii: ,:it..:iii:::::;.:.:•.::::::.::.....;,...;.,...... ,. „..,........„....,,.:::::::::::::: . ..,:.%.......::::;:::::::*::::::•:...:::::::::.:•::„.:;;;......• - ;K:s.-:......::::::•:•:, •-...v. ...,„0000.. •, !:!.:::::::5A:::i::::::;:::.:, -1-43-•-t-f4. Itt, '..:*.::::.:::::.:::::.. ::::r44,..!§.0;:.::.. .....,•..,, 7.-.....:%.,:::::,:•:•:.?:•.:4i,:•.:•.§.. +.:..% - N.. • :...:•:::e. ;,.:,..::.*.:*.* :::.*::;&.:::::::::::::::: .::::::::::::::: - -:.:-i------. .•:::::::-.::...... --4.......::, :.ftix-f.3:" , ::fif .410::.,: 0 --- 11! :::::::::::::::iiii:Mg:: I ::itgii:•:•::,:::::. •N:::;14;;;K:;:;;:if•,W.0.*::...iAiti+1.4:.:'itaiii4.;::::*::::.,_:::*:-.• ' P! iiii:i§ht,4".W.ff::::id I •::.gr.ZIA::*::: -1::::.:::::.:::::.1,!:**-:„::s';'.0.trIA::::,:::::•:::::::::::?.*::•::::','"'' :::::::2::::52:;*.,..: -5, .......scAg 'a 1 . ;,.,....L$:,*....:::::::,:ii., ii:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::_A,. • .....:: :•- ::::;,.:1 ife:::::::::y:::.- iiiii..wiiii,,,:k 1, , . iii;:li.;:iiiir,:ik.:::::::::..r-t 0,.................... - „..:..::::-,•-.::::::,--.4:-......:2;--...., *War `.....:gift:I.,":4” • .:..Volz, ::::::::;:::::::A.::•:: :::::1'.;i11:::1:: 4:::;:::;:i.§.1k Wi:44:::::/::?: . 11,1411,"---..-1- .•wLIV.7--• •":-‘09 •.,,,, '' ......,.(..pi,. rilmil 1 ..................::::t .....::::.:::::::::::.,:...::::.....,......::::::::::::.:;:.:::,...::::7::::•::.K.:;::•:.:.::::44:::::. ',:lic,• `;'‘ . ..:::..5V.:,„ ..,.,,L. q '..•:•'''•-‘:Pii,:t:•".• :::::::::::::::;::::.:::::.t if4::::.:::.',..:4.:114:•4j0.:.:'4.:.:•••:4.:4•4 44.444.:•44.:".4444.444.444 61i14:::;:t'alifOW' •.' .......•.'44...::•::iilt.:Wa...:4:1::,:iy...:•:.::.::;:.:::1..:$::::::::::1::•:.:::igiv..._ . ., i itv '-'•'''::::•::::::.: 43lie.-117:.."-../140t#4.••11t1FF::::!*:.•p!iik.: 1.Ni: ,&„ 0..:•*"...:/.f. ,,P% 5.7".l'.- ir •....4 •.4f.f.....::” Ot, .A.•:•::•:.:•:.:;44:44,:••:::.:. .4::•:4..::::....:::::......::444:::.:4:::: '....4. .L.L. 4,P.....,•-• ''••:,:',::.:."4::::::.:•::: .*::'::::•:.:::;::•::.....:•::::::,.:•::::•::K •••:. VN.. '1°Ek- .0.*::::.7. 0'. > — -- .,r.4-1'. (,.., , •' . -:•:::.:.:::::::-:::::::::::::::::::::::::.:::,..::;:::::::::.;::::;. -,:,-:::;.-.::::i;.--:: :-..-:. ..- . ,--.. 'i 44 _.... ...._ _ — , . 4 vr,r r. ( 7 , _ • 7' . . ;it i.ti,:), Aci.ji •••... . ...ire2 r• , .. .1 N: a Ri...; c4 it./.. 44" At c 11111 .."... .\,. , 11 III .• -- ii LU / N' Y ;,.?.,) :...ltsii: :•1 • I-- 'i .( - . ` _. 11.1.1.1 .„ . 1 T.I 11 .. \ . Ply g •• s.,1 .. •• .... -. 0 le.../ • r• .p3.....1 .1 .:• „, .. . . . . • Ci) '`—' —' ' . 4" - .- ... .,-•\....` ii- -.1(::: .'":-. >- DOW41. : ;-.. ..,., . •\ ill .N. 14‘2..:•;‘...:.i.i.,.: ,..4;..4--` 3 •. ..--• " • s'‘1\ ... •.:.!7.1....1K6A:r•slc . ie 1 - • 0 • •CO 1 - •-: - ' . 0 . ..\‘ . N.. . .." .... : \\ • \ \ .• . r . ci 1 - - - . t(...11 // -!"..t. '‘• C... ' '‘' • ' ..... OD 1— 7 if) 1 . . . ... .. . 0 U. . . , *ttre. ' .. •p- • -,;;;:---- -----7 -0--t4",-- " :!...,'' •- --- aiall!ncr: 1 eilwiel Z '...." •••:::::•?. CC ). i giq. Adi&‘ . (( ,It• s... ) / • 4fr V. :'''%:.•„ \ '. ‘ . di i_. 1.- --- a (11) --''.°111!" ;;' '‘7. ,:-T&J • ' '.\ • i"' Um a■is . to • -14 • . - '•• s• • N . .... W . 13 .' • ••■ \ . fial 1.2. 1 !.I _____.. __.. •, 's '. 11:\ C1C CC 11-ir -- - .- •\%, a. • - LU- . .....: di ....- I ii• le - • i .. - .- . - , ,i,-„,--. .---,) __, •i 7 (:•••- , S 1 ‘ 170 ol ■ . Ars' s VII 41 — . Ir id 4 1 111 1 1 I. '--- / 1 I I 11 n9nTirfir t■ % . I 1 . ' > . . Z .,,,,,,~■Kr, $ . .. . F" RI--" 1424 xi:-41.4■" a .1; 4 t tqii, La bk- . ti --,z • Aam, \ 4 Itilw- lrekkirgit- ! "-_,„„ ti vl ii„s 0 g I/'re-° g '''. \ \ ir ir ajb■rer ig, _ . mi. .._... ...I ff_ ' ''''.1 ;b1111.•'41 i 'IF/iii irillii 1 \Nit'Pill 114 II," ;7-7 . X . Dtgill! : ut1111111 tlik \ \\ U I . Et. .1.4.... 4011 \ \"=".:••• ..-.:.. , -. - • --- . re inal Illr:We or.=In "••■••....... . \ . 0 • : • ..... .., . . . _..... .. . a Twin". 1,2 C\ASID1 %.-tt . . . - 9 11— IL MI WIZ I 41113 (I' 1"... , , ,. .,.... _v..., 0 cc 0 [ Z ui >- 1/I° I A • /411,- , ca . ...,: t.1,* r.ri-;91111110- I . 05 o „op ..„„,./ le 0. 4,.,/41r,i i . -,,sz, . slz, W u. • N •:.' \, 8 0 ..,::, mt-_,--ird,,, ritti , ' cc 64-11,1, ih-Pi ct-inew.a_,:J 1 1 • 0. . 4444 '‘INi irP-E-4.,„ arj-ll', ... .. \ .• 11,A,V110,1% Pill• -1.74,..1"---,OA 4 I _ _ . . • ( •-_, .---) - III4 '- ell . r— • • •op &moll co! . . • •• Olt bin IN _...44 ....4____ . • - Ibaulnainni•Atiii NW tillb■ Z ' 1 i . • -.• • 44C • • ?A , , • • • 'y (�_r��Nv►_ • V4L • ri ANTE '� , 'fi RAC 15 mat .-�•A.:.; ilk ii rtalni<Nu ,[ I : 4/4��A`i`m PO+T Lull 1 ' ,sy► `i , 31� AR 9 „ 'le. L �� 93(_45,. ; AD. J+J��_ if. • 9 ,,.s: :�.Ir�,;";, vows. �`, , +/ :4‘ .�j • al i �Y" j ~CR 4 , '�:il1g Mlt � + �.-744kNi \ '6. 17t'p....18 /-/ •. C gm* mailkd 011114 . 94 r,, . >.;....HA.. A . ...W. ,.. - !itaisi.,\ - .WiRAti5 1 : �--�' , 92 5.5 • Al I mss- 1.c. A3 ylVAP-ili( l vim. •• 1 �- ii, �'.i i H , ■,,?4, .,T'' "-;14 Ap \-= : 1 /I %.:///'('■ M l/ ' A‹..:' 01-44-. ' - --- --.._._... . „2. •<1 23 W ' .'.; / ----=: , 't . / ....:_i_I ; / '/. • ' / � .� lk PROJECT SITE FIGURE No. 17 • STORM SEWER LAYOUT • LEGEND . • •mom MIAS . MAP ,"TOM MAW NON* ISTONY I NT STATION IANNNO • • STOW LIFT STATION b.......4 . O *TOM Pp10EYAN N.♦.•.0♦.• CITY OF : °^ °N ...... ...... POND NORMAL W A T E R um. • . . . . 900.0 EA G A N POND WIN WATR11Ii1�R • 900.0 oc9\ OVIONAND SAMNA,NOM Agenda Information Memo April 18, 1995 Eagan City Council Meeting B. COMP. GUIDE PLAN AMENDMENT & REZONING - NORI HART • ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: To approve or deny a Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment from Limited Business (LB) to Single Family Residential (D-1) for Lot 1, Block 1, Liebel Addition. FACTS: • The Advisory Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on the Guide Plan Amendment and Rezoning at its meeting of March 28, 1995. • The Advisory Planning Commission recommends approval of both the Guide Plan Amendment and the Rezoning. • The Harts' wish to convert this building (at one time the old Blackhawk School) into a residential use. It is currently a motor cycle shop and general office. • If the Comprehensive Plan Amendment is approved by the City Council, it will be submitted to Met Council for review. The rezoning will then be placed back on the Council agenda as a Consent item in the future. ISSUES: None BACKGROUND/ATTACHMENTS: (2) APC minutes of March 28, 1995 - page 0D3 Staff Report - page CVD11 �a�� (3\0j, Page 8 March 28, 1995 ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION COMPREHENSIVE GUIDE PLAN AMENDMENT AND REZONING NORI HART Chairperson Miller opened the next public hearing of the evening regarding a Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment changing the land use from LB (Limited Business) to D-I Single Family Residential (0-3 units/acre) and a Rezoning from LB (Limited Business) to R-1 (Single Family) for Lot 1, Block 1, Leibel Addition located in the NW'/, of Section 20 at 3850 Beau D' Rue Drive. Project Planner Tyree introduced this item. Ms. Tyree highlighted the information presented in the City staffs planning report dated March 20, 1995. Ms. Tyree noted the background and history, the existing conditions and the surrounding uses of the subject property. Ms. Tyree noted that the applicant's intent is to use the existing structure as a residence. Ms. Tyree concluded that the proposed comprehensive guide plan amendment is compatible with the surrounding area and the request for the proposed rezoning is consistent with the majority of the surrounding uses. Member Heyl stated that she has no objection to the rezoning but inquired as to whether the surrounding uses was residential. Ms. Tyree advised that the property to the east of the subject property is single family and duplexes and the property to the south is park property. Member Heyl moved, Wallace seconded, a motion to recommend approval of a Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment changing the land use from LB (Limited Business)to D-I Single Family Residential (0-3 units/acre) for Lot 1, Block 1, Leibel Addition located in the NW/4 of Section 20 at 3850 Beau D' Rue Drive. • All approved in favor. Member Heyl moved, Wallace seconded, a motion to recommend approval of a Rezoning from LB (Limited Business)to R-1 (Single Family)for Lot 1, Block 1, Leibel Addition located in the NW1/4 of Section 20 at 3850 Beau D' Rue Drive. • All approved in favor. In response to Chairman Miller's inquiry, Ms. Tyree advised that there will be no commercial use in the existing building, but only residential use by the applicant and her family. PLANNING REPORT CITY OF EAGAN REPORT DATE: March 20, 1995 CASE: 20-CG-8-11-94 20-RZ-24-11-94 APPLICANT: Nori Hart HEARING DATE: March 28, 1995 PROPERTY OWNER Roger Grommesch PREPARED BY: Shannon Tyree REQUEST: Comprehensive Guide Plan & Rezoning LOCATION: Lot 1, Block 1, Leibel Addition - 3850 Beau D'Rue Drive. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: LB - Limited Business ZONING: LB - Limited Business SUMMARY OF REQUEST Nori and Daryl Hart are requesting a Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment to change the Land Use Guide Plan designation from LB - Limited Business to D-1, Single Family Residential (0-3 units/acre) and a Rezoning from LB - Limited Business to R-1 Single Family for Lot 1, Block 1, Leibel Addition. AUTHORITY FOR REVIEW RezQnin : Chapter 11.40. Subd.5.E.: "The Council shall not rezone any land or area in any zoning district or make any other proposed amendment without first having referred it to the Planning Commission for its consideration and recommendation." BACKGROUND/HISTORY In 1980, Gordon and Doris Leibel rezoned the approximately half acre site from Agricultural to Limited Business and platted it into one lot. Prior to this action the property was used as a duplex and before that a school. In fact, it was District 104's "Old Blackdog School" and was used as a school from 1905 thru the '50's. (see exhibits). EXISTING CONDITIONS: As it exists now, the building is used as a motorcycle shop in the garage; a general office, an office for the practice of holistic medicine, and a CPA 's office on the top level. The CPA has officed in that location for the last 11 years. Located along the perimeter of the site are many large trees. The building is located in the south central portion of the site and access is from Beau D' Rue Drive. sc: 7 V (( • Nod Hart - Comp Guide Plan Amendment - Rezoning March 28, 1995 Page 2 SURROUNDING USES: The following existing uses,zoning,and comprehensive guide plan designations surround the subject property: North - Beau D'Rue Drive, Langhoven Addition, and unplatted property; zoned R-1 and CSC; guided D-III and CSC. South - Woodhaven Park; zoned P; guided P. East - Woodhaven Park and Marrell Addition;zoned P and R-2;guided P and D-M. West - Cedarvale Lanes; zoned CSC; guided CSC. COMPATIBILITY WITH SURROUNDING AREA: The structure does not appear to look like an office or other type of commercial building. It looks residential in character, and still retains many of the early schoolhouse characteristics. Its rear yard abuts Woodhaven Park pond. EVALUATION OF REQUEST: Introduction. The Hart's are proposing the requested comprehensive guide plan amendment and rezoning to single family so they can reside in the building with their eight children. The house is big enough to accommodate their needs. Comprehensive Guide Plan:The proposed change to the Comprehensive Guide Plan from Limited Business to low density residential will be compatible with the surrounding area. Rezoning The proposed rezoning is consistent with the majority of the surrounding land uses. The area has single family residences as well as duplexes located within close proximity. Prior to its rezoning to office uses it was used as a school, and residential before that. The existing structure looks residential in character and not like a typical office builidng. Grading/Wetlands -The applicant does not propose to do any grading with this change in use. $torm Drainage/Water Ouality - The site is adjacent to Pond AP-1, which is a scenic recreation classified waterbody. Sanity Sewer&Watermain-The existing building is connected to City sanitary sewer and watermain. SUMMARY/CONCLUSION: The proposed Comprehensive Guide Plan and Rezoning from Limited Business to low density residential appear to be non-impacting on the existing neighborhood and more consistent with the general neighborhood. Nori Hart - Comp Guide Plan Amendment - Rezoning March 28, 1995 Page 3 ACTIONS TO BE CONSIDERED: To recommend approval/denial of the requested Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment changing the Land Use Designation from LB- Limited Business to D-1 Single Family Residential(0-3 units/acre)for Lot 1,Block 1 Leibel Addition. To recommend approval or denial of the requested rezoning from LB - Limited Business to R-1 Single Family for Lot 1, Block 1, Leibel Addition. (:) (r" BURNSV/L :£ - ' - ."\ • i . . Li '� I- .1" • - -.�- b , I■• -ti j'vall ' - -' t r .2...., ..1(,, .141) ,....0.,_ , 1 .AtIL - --.___.-..--'--..--'• - -.....--.--„*-,..',.. -., I, --: . '7%--T-.•j-.F.'- '71-1 , . *7/--, - ... .‘ --J:1"- ... L :-;_'rim i &1,r' .0- : . 7 !,. .v_ . 3 ' M . •\. :01:0",.a...... . C 1 . • :',411-4Zi IF pit ) ..iikil., :.*-•__ :13:..•, .. 111.41.7r7— ___44-,-.a , '. ,-.. (r) !WC —3Q1 ZIFF .\ — IOW•. O „�{• � it r^ 7 1 -.•-`� 4.) �. i .,k,..-`.• �i 'act n1. .LL1Y / .. }, I(t j, ii . .1 Pet •r,,_ . •� Y +W ,t, r 4 may` ff'4 K N., �.It�ra Y 1 • • -. - 'I;•-.----r 1, ' 7- “t, 1 r". w n. O• , •' V 1------V.., ...'ki- .-•-:t' . k c,,14,1:.'.... - t !,..., ''t A. ' '4, ..`r. liffAiii *---- - - t ' - _ _. ® -. - A- •_-,-.. ..-,-.=.=dC ,r g L+Y' IE...&?, -_� .••■111 . _ 11t -_ .. N/- -1 !/=1 `;\p1 r•t •,i • . . 1 11�f7�'y�, 4, -To •11.4, \ ~� 1.r ? �' 'p\�I �\ 1' t pie 1•. .g\ r�/ ; ��r i �•f / 1`� ` 1 / %L\ ■ \ 0 %. k% 0•-•... %di! *)0-• •,..'-4.:", If%la, ' it . \\/ i% ...!• t4`.'e .r • 1%111x: 1 �g� ' am y\# 1 .•_ ,,,�• i`; , R r►1 "�i . • .� \0...... 11ti1111j11l �y- ;1�f�lj�fo^y9 �` �:'to‘ ffO `� /�r /1 . 1 = ii /ii !1 1, A41.4)% o'' j 1 - .•♦ %Vdr-1::>,/ O //' 1. .. 1111 t 41.. r y�;I 161,''' '� \ - .1•t > *A - 1 1 I 4411 10 ; '.. "C Jr v.0„. .wo, , '.s . , )?,44,..,•'" * %.... • , s . _ 1 .. 1 I i". +cam° 1 • y �' 1 ♦ \ 11 % 1 0jj - a - o • ♦---..•• -a r 0 Y, . - , - - 1 11'+ /� /1l/ 11,40,+ /// I/ _ ♦'� / : \, '.% g1 .Il1�11 411, ill/ic ` /!Vj 'n4 r % �(' y 1 ,�'�yi / .— y spa' 11 7 .ter/ ,i /' !+ 'll) Jt�I I t / - '�� s"-.. p . �,/,F ' ' l: e ,% 1 014/1 1�!/ ttt\ \\' '�I y ••• ••�• 0 1 ll', to �� ` % \ / 011011111 %•" is Z = ' //i. l�j •., .`. ___ _ ._ _-- ''. )J,� .` 1 p11,11,41‘,6,1,1,t1:-.1.;-% C.\ . ly -4 1619 . + '4e-1A- \ �10 h/!011 11&N R�� II I _ 1. 1 _i ffi � I • joy . d nor,ti � 1 � _ ?�5�` 1 I I r. -... `• ‘1 'IU1j11111 1 1 11,1j/ > 1 pi lda' , led •'9�I 1 / 1 I!t[I,11! (11111)k1 .. r g dal v �� P��i R 1't +� 1 11 q !IIIg41i r:/;���--- 71'.. a�' / Jo•o — ' _ I ---.- - - : 1\ 1 /� /i/j 1111111111!^!///4 �`-4. 1 '1 f I L ■Zle f 4V0 rrti, /1//i _ I n1 / ! /'d/41l /!3/, / 11 _Il " .1- u Ili 11 `t1► / f - / li •�l a t 1 Imo ` „MVO 1,141"i / / 1 1 1) =- i 1t %- i/� , • t a _ I111• /1/Rllil-t c 1rl/ it s...4, �i�i,lpi1 .��/� i rr 1 : 11 v \ es lllff/l1�Q X1141111 o'j �, ���� t�i��`'/„,/,,t. ".e '-• ... , • •• • - \ • (1.166.11. 161011".1%A. f A L --• ...• '. • tee+IVIr r_raM s` .• 15r „,innorumny l _ _ N I� k. & I e , 7—.1.-7"L'''1.--e''':A ,;•i.^ / ;,,;, l jam'"'., c; ! 43a� o ,:+; _t •:t ,.e III.\s v 5 -;.:. pAlovirzkii•. 5 :e.c!...-, '4=6.1•::a ^Pleil Airg5A. - M -!7 , pe • ••. `�O�` _ •.' ;.:r� •\ .r !p°srr�i, tom— yp�{�� ��t ':ice _:,' '•, r Tr-It - -J;.:;`?:• Wiz•••"+- "'- 3• ��' ''' • ?+ a te— *.,• .,, ?;, *.••r r =:,:1.:nj•.•'i1.'' '3 t\'',i:{:'.. ® s '"P•— r J a. ;.�. �Orj�.. ,f• ,Ii•�:•,...,—...,.7.3 T:' .t.6• r`: '....• , ., tW.+4. LZEi;N � •. 44 •-N' 4•: tY .i. :r.,•:IFIVQ-1:' 'r.V: - '*∎T _ `'✓✓/.�/eye• ' f• -p 1� aN- • .:11:.�: Ea 4,, _ • . .,''..N. 1....V.,A:.:'s.,N...`4 V4 V.,;!'‘I: III 5 VI ' '1.7 •t;'': ...-....-'''--■,,_'‘) ‘NNI.!",,,-, .:46 4 Is.. •%• \NIPI \\.:.,,:.,_. 4.-__ .41,11.110 0 Ilt.r2ng,. . — '1 . . --'' \ i \.: J„ • • • • d`tx-� ?��: ;`--:tom 09, IN `,# • - - a - • 'l T,-'.tom-- a'- '. a• K•� -Z"'.."--1=''"=-•- ��. G -Jam,, `�5����-..... -.i',1 q #F -� 1 :• 7r ? "ii g In cp 5 .3:t.:-.:P:” 1;..z. .,,," 11111 'I" 2 I'M g • . ....7:;-.". :;?'.k.' ''''''',;'•EiL.,. 4.›... 44%.6_,& .01 P.,...„, 1 _ 1 e- 8 t AI k , �+ '''� -_ °`i : gam:='�i, 'k' -*4:n _i-�1 / r ‘ _.---•.,g., ..15.--.1.,-;:4.,w_"•:i.:._*---..,--+.7-,_,:-..,,,*.4 .0,,,—...mt„,=•-..•": $1 / :4, --- -*,r _V ... -..-tA -...-.VA. " , . _ . , 4s. LI II ell N 11L-7. 1,.;'''w -7c..,--fZq.›.7- '1�� Q1.! ' = 7',.^. c% . '�� ' 1 ,,F_-_;_c5.- -,..74...---_--.-w -.. ‘.--" 1 ..111111(.41/4, r. 0g.., _ .. •. , , >o .i is 41•u•1 i w o o 'CC�„ i rL .r • • 0 V t.•_V •N�\�1 •VytC _ re V C e �' .• I. v • Ir. Z • • vs '.�Nw�r.A.: ....- 8pE- ~ V • O 3 I ' .c : I C IL r• • i O .yI,t\ • '1F'•• 4J Z N O Y N an 4 C W O ` .0 r. '1•yk'l.:f i•';',.`'.`•::.I'. r. :.. V c a �• 0 1.r• l ,1.r: • •• y `0. 4'• ..1 ice' - ' .- .. 1_ •. a c- •' 'CS .r t 3ti;j .fi :1s� C cq c L. s r lr � ' � 6. t N .l:V 1 nl 1 • • . 4_ •.V. .. • +rli. _•11.4:.f'',4'd�wtli3''t?�.':.6• 7r::`: .t . CA °o it 0 S / • ( � Of ti /, ' 0 H1nOS! ' • ' • 22 OZ £•69I H1f10S •• - - — — - . I O,� OQ O/ % __ 1 1IVJaII 33S I ! ON 3MNO 1 11: ' ••!, �_� ? sva37't lOIIMI in 3111 l A'IN3J53M tl '� 1 J .Cis 1 N A IDS t` 77 1 M . . I.v W 4 Z),`"'•/ F F Q1 •/ 4u 'tt' e t < Rz 4 . yl. Wh `• 1` m • Qy la 0 SW' �� a N' saQ Y �" Z g / l C • Pfd; / Z al U F vg � M r _ a4 N • OS N 4 V y % - o n I in '� co al 111 1 IStl l \ ` S 1p v 0 �� N r I.AI• r.i I • CSi;9 �� ( 0001E - 1•►G61%J - �. 6£zo2 IIJIV r uP 008• 00 09s woos yJ , '' ,�� 1— .419.c 9 Ii '¢OZ. s, `• M P. T� 40 .-I P.7O �* ,O�ti,, ' w/, s r" / N' a \ 4) CO V� $2 v 213 I 1 • \ s O r. �i I °W•• `\ 6' W Of ti IU 1.1 ,i1O'•r �`2 u•W V 3 II J NN 'yJ\1 ` 2 t W W +� _v�/^ °a 0 1.of• 4?44, 1 '/� o ' 0 s • \, ' +01„.�' ' of z i- 'l�� tie `/ //N\NN. / 1,-. 7 % ~r) •1 ,�, \ --- b O �� /r`,, I . . v \ . . t a(o9 N\ . • • _ • _. .•AMa••... • 5 - . _- _ _. . . i••�'�!- 711;1,.. 1,. y �.1• District 104, the"Old 131uckdog �` � s ,"� :; `• School."(John P.liennelly) •.. ..di . e.,. . err. .:rr.,..,t,. .r.'311....44:eite; 1:. , •‘... •„._, 4 ' , . %:-'-'411.:2, Ill - '4.• ..04. • '1!...i v4 Y :'j; District 104 tuden • • h a rr '° �/ „�. ! students,c. 1905(Trustees r `' '•ti. .�_• "' -'r ', \ -''�'= I. James Slater Jinn Kenneuly, Sr. and •, ,:ii-.:. ;. '�� 40.: •4,4't-4., l's ,�4 J41 .f, tip'. •' .. ` R 4, 'Y=x j, r ,��x.�4 „ Mike Burry at top right).From,left to• :.• 1• ^(f,'•• 1,' �: ^"' .rry� `Y. right: William Bradshaw, Marie • 144'7''{ . J ,�+.• ;'f r •, Bradshaw Susan S&:oil Mary Wenzel•f !'s«.:...i 'a .. ;Y�i ... 'c ' . : - � i<, .'" •,*.e:w?• Paul Wenzel,Albert Wenzel,Jue .\ t �+ ,,: f " ' •: i Kenneuly,Elizabeth Burry,Eddie•• • 3 •Y.1 �• ;, ;; : ''.c Burry. Second row:Ceorye Wenzel, )' ti • 1 ,_ y" * : �. Alice l luuse,Mayme Sluier, Ed Sluter, k Mae Kennedy. Third row:1-lowurd ir• Pepin, Cliff Pepin, Mollie Scutt,Jimmie 1(cr� "`` ,•• y •' :r1 r f 7 scot', Lathe House,Joe Slater, 'lbm :ov.?: ;111 '� 't ;• ".;:k, t+4' 4;;'-*w •'r� . Sluier John Slider Joseph Kennedy, 4. •Aar:inr 4f 04,* ' }itsx'Y 1 . , M .,,,;~�'i!'•° 'ti ;.Y 7:y '6, .;:'i'4'�Gr.',. ;k 'rrl - , ,•` 4; Y,..•• •• Tom Kenneuly, Lucy Burry Ann Burry, br"!v:•••{ ...,1•4 •a'Yy t , �:,1 r ,� YI7 �; r Della Pepin, Catherine Burry. Fourth%1 :MI,4 -� , , K : -....1..r:•.1..�}' ` .;f•'4 ■ i row:Elizabeth/louse,•• ,, w, � .• • �+ Olga Wenzel, Nellie&-oii,Elizabeth• `; �;�.40A `1I ei•i�tiOir'•.A...(1,4,' ,' %1',4 ;.,''4'. 4 4 Kenneuly,Bridget St ott, Muthilclu••i, '\„ i • r '; '.-i6 `�I h11++��Y� 4• ■ O'Briun. (Rodger Slater) IVii. 1 w. .•. ..- -.. �.�Yyt.,'.- - +_-y s, ......... y 4 -ti;, Ni.Y .� 5,sia'0.4 :fk '.!::+i t �F„`r te'- r,S”. 1• • i P._.. ___.............. ._W....... 'i, M� E' it:pi �. `1,+;t : 44N3,-~F t • fir "• ':i,.: -•,;, " f�' I. 1 . , de :- •'t,■■ft -.■,.til ...f.. , ,,,....;: '::vri f ..•S.' . t ■ • 1i11 ; , '1 Li : • _t• *'� R P :4:::-.;45,,,i,=•.1,„.... i •, 'fd,-• . J vi l "4 �i` `' ,• ''r :� 4.:' s,�n •• , 1';',;'. ` .at •:ifi'• � ,�it )• sv 1, ' ' • '3 ,ylC.." ..._ ii 1 r` !l e. :",� 1�F4;;; t�;lit: ` �Tf�p.. •ir .14:1/�,'� t+ ti+ 4 1,� Yls r, eG• 11111?kik • "y t .ti+ .i .4.1;C`•F; .iFTi�`i'fili`,.�li+ •k l.J1tn•! •.,.?,� 1 l,Ek it:3 1 ��«1'' i . ' F, �.�j1u� 1 5 101 acp . ._ ___ , , i District 104's spring t•kmunul), 1950. : Front:I.44,yArtclerson. First roar, left '� " . iii ,. . .............,,• .\t• 1 •t, t to right:Shirley 11w:tel.Don Spencer. i.% t "�'�,j ,,t. •. 1lelen ICenneuly.Jo Ann/'riche, Laura �!''r •�. ,�, I'tk4K,Ellen AulWh', Gloria Italia', 1Z1 ..t:r ' ' '.� I ,��• �j• • . >4 Steve I.c►►tg, Nartc y Nichols,li)rrc►i►te :.►•.'t' ' , '� � r, :1.•', r*. r.'r • AtiI ek,Jinnie Retrer:Stm. Second row: " 4.t.. .{�`j it;: ';' 1 S.'. : Jerry l)ittman,Grover Doebel, — . ••s)! •• 6 ,,,i ,l p I Toward Anderson,1311 Slater. Robert _._ .. t • Rahn,Rau Rueyer,Duane Anderson, _ • _� >� ..• Eileen Slater, F.►nta Sieg, Dorothy _ " F A w...9014 Skater.I.on•crine Skater. '1 `' ;~ M 1 f 1•7,t0-•, _ Imo. 1 : '� %�•t. I)isl►iet 104 students, 1946(leacher C, : 1,1:- - 1141 ; f' ' .� • Carol Mc�xdner(tl front). Icli row of •;1314 i,' '6;: ,- li •r %; , 1 , y .t': semis,jronl of photo t bark: 'y t �' t 'i Palette,.terry Dittman, Gloria Kuhn, i��,,,•.fi ! ,r •. �e • I „ . I.ur7•uine Slider,Robert Ituhrt,Jerry •w,k�;��'�"�'."; .�' ''•••� ^� 4 "' ;. '�� •y' •'''•Slater. Second roll,:Bill&aver•s, Eileen ;i l,..;cat, '"•',Y + h ;i. ,,.• ,:-Ki `;; •f•' ••`r y : ••, Slider, Grover 1)oeltel, Billy Slider,Roy +p � '��t t�`t;`v'*.} t.,.--I��.,'•':. : ' F�.,:; ;;' !i4 Itereger, f:Idoris Rohn. Third row: 'f' ''"' ,... ..t '4. h •y -; '' '1 • ; ` Frani•es Adelman, ib)rnmie Skater, Dorothy Slater,Lorna Rahn. IIrnuurd ' Adelman,Loren 1)idl►nun. f-nn-Ih row: • h'rescr Slater.I ter lwrl Adelman, . Charles Lehman,l lnrold Adelman. (1_uplk,Duelte,and 1Melen Slider) • • ,� 1i,�'`. 1. ,Sys` '- t1 q • S'._-0 .' 1** .' v t,At.1 ' r •� t'% ? ,-� • �_ t �,•".�,. T.A1'`.a{ii_ � ryyri ,�4.41" .• i' �W 'r1,`/•'a etf{�''�,7Y1,:--,\..!fii'ii�:;'sJ"rf hr --.- -.•':,.1.. -. <� :yQ ;2''•L. .� ,i• L. ,„,.1,.1 t .. r,,...4 •,:•„ ;...,,,„.....,.,. .„,..„ .d••tic :. .!`1`d .•`{ �yf{�'�'� , ,,•��"{i.f", 'a:..... `,, {' - &. �A,::. i -.,:,. ... ...1• ...,. .. „, ��'� ,' " / ;AI ,:'' I�,,, ►,•iiLyfiR y- Sr '''''111 i it:'1' I ii14 7 •"•� ,. AlIJS. •t. • 'r?� ,\,. �'�{ �uyt il.- . . 0 . ... ',�Ni f::.' •• •i i ill 'e•f� • I !; .:- ":. ',Kt.\ • 1- r: •.f 1,....).•,,_ ' • ' v `' t 7 SasI s ) i 1,1 • ,(� ii•�i rt-4,,:-,.•: �1', y•v?�fLjN ,� ...m,', ' .� , , b•'114...71,1.-VI,pf ire t 1, • �iJ'' .i.�.ti 1-..41.1.. .'l}jrS '"i i - �;t ;` .11`4 '� \ ,71 ' +. 7 "%',7)$.1�- •: 4—(1'i' ,;;'' -ty'�t`%:+�C'�! ', - ifs •Vr. ii.)rc 7`.t' t'•`, P, r;r•: ! M, " ,.:(1' `�tiyli •'51::. -1.• x. r..� ' I j7].- ''Y..'t''. •j:,`•r •yMT,S t.•, �' r' ,” 'c+f. 5 ,• N_• a - �;�, fill y., '•0 (, I 102 • • April 12, 1995 TO: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES FROM: ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT WITT RE: BLUE BELL ICE CREAM SOLICITATION LICENSE Mustafa Qasim Mfaddi, representing Blue Bell Ice Cream, has applied for a solicitation license for 1995. Administrative Assistant, Kent Conyers, has reviewed the application and finds no reason to deny. ACTION REQUESTED: Approve application subject to conditions of license listed below: • 1. Continuation of liability insurance evidenced by an insurance certificate. 2. Hours of operation will be from 12:00 noon to 15 minutes prior to sunset. 3. The license period is from April 19 to October 15,1995. 4. The trucks will not generate a noise level greater than 65 decibels. 5. Caution swing arms will be required on each vehicle. 6. Trucks are excluded from city parks. • • • FEES: ✓S50Investigation Fee(Non-Refundable) • ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••■••••:'•• 7S2S license for up to three solicitors THE APPLICATION FORM MUST BE S 5 For each additional solicitor . . PROPERLY COMPLETED OR IT WILL ' NOT BE PROCESSED. --- LICENSE GOOD FOR UP TO ONE YEAR ••••••••••+•••••••••••••••••••••••••• • - CITY OF EAGAN • BUSINESS SOLICITATION LICENSE (FOR PROFIT) ,APPLICANT'S NAME: M WSJ c`,"- Oa-3 , ,N • iYl proL d at,c' . LOCAL ADDRESS: I9`7 '<A�/ `) .9/4- (middle) (last) s '/ • (street) / (city&state) (ap) HOME PHONE: G If C C o6 4 BUSINESS PHONE: B RH DATE: (5-5/I6/S q SOCIAL SECURITY NO.: 472- 2S_ 7/°3' DRIVER'S IIC.NO. M — /30 ` 6IS 703 - 37/ MsV ( ) APPLICANTS CURRENT AND PREVIOUS ADDRESSES FOR THREE YEARS PRECEDING THE DATE OF APPLICATION: a Q v;su TS R.a EET CITY/STATE/ZIP E TO P /L1.9 4C C,Art/i4 rd S • p c 4 Ai N -- 5/OS 9/9i v ESE?T 10/Q21 ;)fe)e (- // #26.v /9 /a.z.e_ T/ s • ')c•,u R /�/4Cj edI/ /v 044/ • APPLICANTS CURRENT AND PREVIOUS OCCUPATIONS FOR THREE YEARS PRECEDING THE DATE OF • APPLICATION: OCCUPATION FROM TQ • PRESENT NAMES AND ADDRESSES OF APPLICANT'S EMPLOYERS,IF ANY,FOR THE THREE YEARS PRECEDING THE DATE OF APPLICATION: 3 2/9 so�.�,.[,;1,1; AV 4L? �M eC t I c c �c �- I ay FIRM NAME STREET • FROM p LS M N • 5 5 4t o 6 7e_9--5 2.o5 SUPERVISOR CITY STATE . ZIP PHONE •TO • (2) FIRM NAME STREET FROM SUPERVISOR CITY STATE ZIP PHONE TO FOUR CHARACTER REFERENCES (IF APPLICANT HAS•NOT RESIDED IN THE CITY FOR TWO YEARS IMMEDIATELY PRECEDING DATE OF APPLICATION): ' EA= STREET. CITY& STATE ZIP A/p TELEPHONE NO. • • • • CITY OF EAGAN •*****••****•**••••*••••••****••••••• BUSINESS SOLICITATION LICENSE THE APPLICATION FORM MUST BE (FOR PROFIT) PROPERLY COMPLETED OR IT WILL NOT BE PROCESSED. BUSINESS NAME: BL¢-. / t L c- eq.-1A BUSINESS PHONE: 72 9 — 5 2 0 £ LOCATION OF SALES: / /W_i S 14 (�c� it,„ o ci ..(r4 e e f's d (ADDRESS) a (DOOR-TO-DOOR) NAME&DESCRIPTION OF PRODUCT: )/ /9 ece /L e c r:E«,vri '1/ V. 0- ! VEHICLE USED FOR THIS BUSINESS: (IF MORE THAN ONE LIST��SEPARATELY) u 2/z/ MAKE MOTEL YEAR STATE LICENSE NUMBER LENGTH OF TIME REQUIRED IN CITY:. // Ob A/V1 7o S .'3 0 /0 44- DATES OF ACTIVITY IN CITY FROM: 412 /q �� TO: V3-3 v/ 9 OTHER COMMUNITIES WHERE SAME PERMIT WAS ISSUED:_ ,4p/7/e V at(c y //-e i///e Have you ever been convicted of a felony,gross misdemeanor,or misdemeanor,including violation of a municipal ordinance but excluding traffic violations? No _ Yes If Yes,explain on the reverse side,the date and place of conviction and the nature of the offense. ATTACH A COMPLETE LIST OF ALL SOLICITORS, INCLUDING EACH PERSON'S FULL NAME (FIRST,MIDDLE,LAST) ADDRESS(STREET,CITY,STATE,ZIP,PHONE NUMBER,AND DATE OF BIRTH).EACH SOLICITOR MUST COMPLETE AND SIGN A CONSENT FOR RELEASE OF INFORMATION FORM. ORDINANCE ALLOWS A FIVE-DAY (BUSINESS DAY) WAITING PERIOD BETWEEN THE APPLICATION AND APPROVAL OF REGISTRATION DURING WHICH TIME THE POLICE SHALL MAKE AN INVESTIGATION OF THE APPLICANT. THE REGISTRATION MAY BE EFFECTIVE WHEN THE FOREGOING INVESTIGATION IS COMPLETED OR WITHIN FIVE BUSINESS DAYS OF APPLICATION, WHICHEVER IS EARLIER. I SWEAR AND ATTEST TO THE FACT THAT THE PRECEDING INFORMATION IS TRUE AND CORRECT,TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE. I ALSO GIVE MY PERMISSION TO INVESTIGATE ANY OR ALL OF THE PERSONS LISTED,AS DEEMED NECESSARY BY THE CITY. • itafi+e— It/9 / r SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT DATE CL--1, POLICE APPROV' DATE OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK APPROVAL DATE CITY OF EAGAN 3830 PILOT KNOB ROAD EAGAN 55122-1897 681-4600