Loading...
05/15/1995 - City Council Regular ()...... , AGENDA EAGAN CITY COUNCIL - REGULAR MEETING BLACK HAWK MIDDLE SCHOOL MAY 15, 1995 6:30 P.M. I. ROLL CALL & PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE II. ADOPT AGENDA & APPROVAL OF MINUTES (BLUE) • III. VISITORS TO BE HEARD (10 MINUTE TOTAL TIME LIMIT) IV. DEPARTMENT HEAD BUSINESS (BLUE) V. CONSENT AGENDA (PINK) A. PERSONNEL ITEMS rt; B. PLUMBERS LICENSES C. FINAL APPROVAL, Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment, Rezoning and Preliminary • Subdivision; Mallard Park 4th Addition, located south of Diffley, north of Cliff, on the west side of Johnny Cake Ridge Road G D. FINAL APPROVAL, Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment, Rezoning and Preliminary 1 Subdivision; Blackhawk Forest located north of Silver Bell Road, east of Highway 13, west of Blackhawk Road along either side of Robin lane v_-1 E. FINAL SUBDIVISION, Cedar Heights, located on the east side of Slater Road, F. south of Storland Road and abutting the west side of I-35E F. AMEND 1995 Fee Schedule, Buildin& Permit and Plan Check Fees G. FINAL PLAT, Justin Dean Frank Addition, located at 2050 Safari Heights Trail 6f,I 37 on Lot 20, Block 1, Safari Estates 2nd Addition 31 H. CONTRACT 95-03, Approve Plans/Authorize Advertisement for Bids; T.H. 3 and Red Pine Lane Street and Utilities I. CONTRACT 95-05, Approve Plans, Authorize Advertisement for Bids; Blackhawk Hills Addition and Wescott Square Street Rehabilitation 4 J. CONTRACT 94-18, Approve Final Payment; 1995 Sealcoat Aggregate Material e.. PROJECT 643, Receive Feasibility Report, Order Public Hearing; Oslund ■F�� Timberline Addition Street Rehabilitation v S fL. PROJECT 688, Receive Petition, Order Feasibility Report; Eagandale Corporate Center �, 5.3 M. FINDINGS OF FACT and Conclusions on Denial of Variance for Wensman Properties, west of Galaxie Avenue and southeast of I-35E N. FINDINGS OF FACT and Conclusions on Denial of Preliminary Planned �, S/ Development and Preliminary Subdivision for Safari at Eagan, Thomas Lake P0V' / Center . CHANGE ORDERS, Police Building Expansion y la / P. CHANGE ORDER, Civic Arena Dehumidification f) , Q, PROJECT 681, North Nicols Road Street Reconstruction, Consider Request to Modify Scope of Project ,�C�. CONTRACT with Dakota County Soil and Water Conservation District, Erosion TT Control Services IgS. PARKING REQUIREMENTS for Cedarberg Industries, Concur with Staff Direction T. VACATE Drainage and Utility Easements, Receive Petition and Order Public f q Hearing, Cliff Lake Townhomes ` U. VACATE Public Right-of-way, Receive Petition and Order Public Hearing, T.H. n 13 Service Drive, Eagan 13 Industrial Park (Y�/ 0 V. RESOLUTION Setting Public Hearing on Tax Exempt Financing, YMCA of Greater Saint Paul �VI. 7:00 - PUBLIC HEARINGS (SALMON) I), I to VACATION OF Right-of-way, Deerwood Townhomes Addition . VARIANCE, Richard Cossette to the Exterior Building Standards in a Light r(c") I ndustrial District for Lot 6, Block 2, Cedar Industrial Park located on the corner of Kennebec Drive and Seneca Road VIII OLD BUSINESS (ORCHID) f(fe( P A. PEDESTRIAN Crosswalk Study �(� B. STOP SIGN Request, Wilderness Run Road and Wedgewood Drive * � COMPREHENSIVE GUIDE Plan Amendment, Lone Oak Area; ORDINANCE Terminating 7' Moratorium; REZONING, Lone Oak Area, located east of Highway 55 and Lone Oak Road VIII. NEW BUSINESS (TAN) ,q5 A. STOP SIGN R quest, Beaver Dam Road and North Timberwolf Trail B. COMMERCIAL Land Use Plan Amendment - Central Area Plan I,02�4 C. TRANSPORTATION Plan Amendment, Yankee Doodle Corridor D. PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION and Multi-Family Site Plan, Seneca Hills, LGA a Investment Group, Located East of Highway 13 and North of Silver Bell Center /7 /lip E. PRELIMINARY PLANNED Development and Preliminary Subdivision, Indy Lube Addition - Met-Con Companies Located on the west Side of Pilot Knob Road and North of the Phillips 66 Station on Duckwood Drive 1 F. PRELIMINARY PLANNED Development and Preliminary Subdivision, Eagan Woods Office Park 2nd Addition, Old Country Buffet Headquarters; OCB R alty Company Located West of Pilot Knob Road and East of Lost Spur Country Club 17H. PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION, Eagan Corporate Center, NW Mutual Life Located at (1'17. 52-T. the Northeast Intersection of Lexington Avenue and Yankee Doodle Road � PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION, Eagandale Center Industrial Park No. 12, NW Mutual + Life Located on the North Side of Trapp Road South of I-494 PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION, Eagandale Center Industrial Park No. 11, NW Mutual J. Life Located North of Lone Oak Road and East of Lone Oak Circle IR. LEGISLATIVE/INTERGOVERNMENTAL AFFAIRS UPDATE (GREY) R. ADMINISTRATIVE AGENDA (GREEN) XI. VISITORS TO BE HEARD (for those persons not on agenda) XII. ADJOURNMENT The City of Eagan is committed to the policy that all persons have equal access to its programs, services, activities facilities and employment without regard to race, color creed, religion, national origin, sex, disability, age, marital sexual orientation, or status with regard to public assistance. Auxiliary aids for persons with disabilities will be provided upon advance notice of at least 96 hours. If a notice of less than 96 hours is received, the City of Eagan will attempt to provide such aid. • MEMO TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS FROM: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES DATE: MAY 12, 1995 SUBJECT: AGENDA INFORMATION FOR THE MAY 15, 1995 CITY COUNCIL MEETING After approval is given to the May 15, 1995 City Council agenda and minutes for the May 2, 1995 regular City\Council meeting, the following items are in order for consideration. :DEPARTMENT HEAD BUSINESS There are no Department Head items to be discussed at this time. • • 1 1 MINUTES O ' t UUR 111 3b�G OF THE WAN CITY COUN?#1 :: • agan, Minnesota': May 2, 1995 • A regular meeting of the Eagan City' t:Kil #aid'on Tuesday, May 2, 1995 at 6:30 p.m. at Black Hawk Middle School. Present were Mayoftai:i itid.Councilmembers Wachter,Awada, Masin and Hunter. Also present were City Administrator Tom Hedges, Community Development Director Peggy Reichert, Director of Public Works Tom Colbert, and City Attorney Jim Sheldon. • Administrator Hedges noted that''tiie.Coi441' iii rOOsider the Administrative Agenda under Department Head Business if they wish. He noted:iifiiit the st6iiiign request for Wilderness Run Road is being continued to May 15. He also noted there was:.requestby,the applicant to continue the preliminary subdivision and site plan for LGA Investment Gro 0.piunter. rmred, Awada seconded a motion to adopt the agenda. Aye: 5 Nay: 0 Councilmember Awada requested additional language on the bottom of page 1 to read,"While she stated that a city could work to accommodate this requirement, she asked why it was being mandated if they could simply write a letter, in effer,14reating a loophole around the new requirement." She also requested that language be added to pad ragraph 6, at the end of the first sentence to state, "when he was told he could get it last Fall." Wachter i i, ,:blunter seconded a motion to approve the minutes as amended. Aye: 5 Nay: 0 Councilmember Hunter requested; itcriii6tion on page 3 where it states that the executive director position will sunset once the foundation vas fully operational. He remembers that the sunset was for one year. Hunter moved, Masin seconded a motion to approve the minutes as amended. Aye: 5 Nay: 0 Hunter moved, Masin seconded:? i i iiistivri#. ::fitppgiinia:te minutes as presented. Aye: 5 Nay: 0 At this time, Mayor Egan noted that becali$e Mr. Grasser has several items at the end of the agenda, perhaps it would be more appropriate to have him adMiss the Council at the Visitors to be Heard section at the end of the meeting. gem 1. Wachter moved,Awada seconded a motion to schedule Council workshops for May 15 at 5:00 p.m. and May 16 at 8:00 p.m. Aye: 5 Nay: 0 Item 2. Mayor Egan reviewed the meeting that waOild between the Cities of Eagan and Inver Grove Heights relative to the extension of services to Inver Groiie Heights. He noted he made it clear that the City of Eagan would not subsidize tti* Ciily otIsi 0:030a1:feights, and that they wanted to make sure the Infrastructure was property that cannot continue until this issue is resolved and it may take several months before the public..hearings can be held on this. There was a recommendation that joint powers agreements be develop#d: on both the 800 acres that need to be serviced, and for these two developments on an interim basis:to they can proceed. EAGAN CITY COUNCIL MINUTES;MAY 2, 1995 PAGE 2 Representatives of the two subdivg$k ms urged C0011 approval of the interim joint powers agreement. Councilmember Hunter indicated::hi •••�dt 00ve:.a problem with the dual track approach as long as the Council can review it first. Counciimeii'iba.t"titer reiterated that he feels Inver Grove Heights should have a plan first. He feels this is a piecemeal approach. He doesn't feel Eagan should provide services until their development issues are clarified. He doesn't feel Eagan is designed to take on these extra burdens. He noted Inver Grove Heights has other alternatives that haven't been pursued. Discussion followed concerning what expenses will be.reJt .i,irsed by Inver Grove Heights. Councilmember Hunter asked about ii 'eiii ii'itooit'ofYijMee Doodle Road. Administrator Hedges Indicated that Inver Grove Heights would Ike to treat:84s separe3RTy;however he indicated to them that the City of Eagan considers it a related Issue. Councilmember;Hunter indicated he won't even consider extending services unless the Yankee Doodle Road'; ension i spart of the discussion. Director of Public Works Colbert requested clarification of wltM i(#a ea he:cityii$#iould be reimbursed for Councilmember Hunter stated he feels ft should include ,;tuff tirrie. AV4ii a::end Egan concurred. Discussion followed concerning the inclusion of the Yankee Doodle Road extension in the joint powers agreement. Hunter moved, Egan seconded a motion to pursue the drafting of two joint powers agreements dealing both with providing services to the 800 acres in Inver Grove Heights, and providing services to Coventry Pass 5th Addition and Boulder Crest on an interim basis, with the conditions that the extension • of Yankee Doodle Road be included in the:iiik.at:9.rove Heights 5-year Capital Improvement Plan;and that Inver Grove Heights reimburse the City Of:i g$$an..for all costs, including administrative fees. Councilmember Wachter indicated he would like to'SSii:: eir:9verall plan in five.years to make sure they • are becoming self-sufficient. Aye: 5 Nay: 0 In regard to Item D, Award Bid/Miiiicipal Center Remodelina/Roofing and Related Sheet Metal, Councilmember Wachter asked whether this was included in the original bid, and Assistant to the Administrator Hohenstein indicated this portion was recommended to be rebid to save money. In regard to Item E, Chanae Orders/Police Department Building Project,Councilmember Wachter requested a clarification, and Assistant to t0:#10.:MtAi:f0y0t9vHOlonstein gave an explanation. In regard to Item F, Adopt Joint Position on•Aircraft Raparture Profiles, Councilmember Wachter took exception with the statement that the cities sout#j$ast of titg:airport have done their best to provide an area of noise compatible land. He feels the City of*gan is t only city that has done that. • In regard to Item G, Gamblino License RenewaVEiiiiiin Hockey Association. Councilmember Wachter noted the rent seems high. In regard to Item 0, Approve Purchase and Accept Bid/Fire Safety Education Trailer, Councilmember Wachter asked whether this is different than•the one the City had before, and Fire Chief Dale Nelson gave an explanation. A. Personnel Items Item 1. It was recommended to approve the hiring of Ruth Ebert and Cheryl Stevenson as the Clerical Tech Ill's for the Parks and Recreation Department. Item 2. It was recommended to approve the hiring of Pam Marengo as a Clerical Tech III for Central Services Maintenance. • EAGAN CITY COUNCIL MINUTES; MAY 2, 1995 PAGE 3 Item 3. It was recommended to accept the loiter of resignatiop.from Patricia Peterson,a part-time Clerical Tech III at the Fire Department. B. Plumbers Ucenses. It was recommended to approve the plumbers licenses for Cedar Plumbing as presented. C. Wetland Replacement Plan/Eapandale Corporate Center. It was recommended to approve the Wetland Replacement Plan, subject to the following ti lss; 1. Trees#756, 758,761, and 770 in the tree $ntory fOie site shall be preserved by re-orienting Ponds C2A and C2B to the north and 2. The proposed .8 acre wetland mibgataxt Atoe:.due:eastitif MnDNR protected water#135 shall be relocated to avoid Impacts to oaK:#teefi 3. The City will reserve the right to modify the wetland replacement plan based on changes in the Wetland Conservation Act made by the 1995 legislature (which will be known in May 1995). Modification can be made only to the extent necessary to accommodate elimination of tree-related impacts associated with up to .8 acres of replacement wetland. 4. No grading shall be allowed within 30 feet df:the delineated wetland edge of Wetland Basins A and E, except for up to a total of 450 linear feeV:;ali ng ;the south end of Wetland Basin A (for road construction)and north end of Wetland Basin I•(fotdetei*ion basin construction). The 30 foot wide area will be managed to support nature vegetation;06.4 shall be left unmowed. This area shall be clearly marked on both the grading pr;4.: id: i:The field prior to any grading activity. 5. At least .5 acres of replacemerti:wetland shall be established as forested wetland through the planting of tree and shrub species compatible with seasonally saturated soils. The number and types of trees planted shall be based on those shown on the tree inventory which will be removed by filling of Wetland Basin G. 6. The pond level bounce for Pond:Pp 11:..(et%at>Ei:.lAasyt A) should be 3 feet or less for a 10-year storm event and 2 feet or less #br4:2:: 00;et :ev.0.• 7. The developer shall submit for review by the i water re glirces coordinator detailed plans regarding the grading for wetland replacement and Reeding areas, including areas of hydric soil placement and a vegetation planting plan. The plali.must be:e0proved by staff before any grading plan application for the site is submitted to the City. D. Award Bid/Municinal Center Remodeling and Related Sheet Metal. It was recommended to award Bid Division C06, roofing and related sheet metal to Larson-Berry, Inc. in the amount of$29,600. E. Change Orders/Police Department Building Proiect. It viii recommended to approve change orders in the amount of$3,729.81 as presented. F. Adopt Joint Position on Aircraft Deparri, #rp K'at was ommended to approve joint comments with the Cities of Mendota Heights,Mendota,Inver Grove'Heigtits and Sunfish Lake relative to noise abatement , departure procedures. G. Gambling License Renewal/Eaoan Hockey Association. it was recommended to approve a renewal of the gambling license for the Eagan Hockey Association at the Cherokee Sirloin Room at 4625 Nicoll Road. • EAGAN CITY COUNCIL MINUTES; MAY 2, 1995 s PAGE 4 ""' H. Annual City Auction/June 3. 1995/C001 Maintenance lriicility. It was recommended to declare unclaimed property and miscellaneous City'pfd y..to. aurf;►1us and to set the annual City auction for Saturday, June 3, 1995. • I. Vacation of Public Drainage and Utility Easement:Receive Petition/Order Public Hearina.Villas of Violet Lane. It was recommended to receive the petition and schedule a public hearing for June 6, 1995 to consider the vacation of public drainage and utility easements as described within the Villas of Violet Lane Addition. J. Aonoint Reoresentative to Gun Club Lake Water> ji,tl Manapg bent Organization. It was recommended to appoint Mike Foertsch as the City's representative to the GiiWClub Lake WMO. K. Proiect 665. Receive Final AssessreteRiSk914 dP lblic Hearina. Blackhawk Road Street Rehabilitation. It was recommended to reOli e:theifinakgSSOSS:fnent roll for Project 665 and order a public hearing for June 6, 1995. L. Authorize Acquisition of Riaht-of-way.Central Area Transportation Improvements, It was recommended to authorize the acquisition of Parcel#10-01000-030-75 as public right-of-way for the future Central Area Transportation Roadway Improvements through negotiations or condemnation if necessary. • M. Final Subdivision. Prettyman Heiatilii:ACAdgitign. It was recommended to approve the final • subdivision. • N. Final Subdivision. Skyline Heights Addition, 'It was recommended to approve the final subdivision. O. Final Approval of Comprehensive Rezoning. Nod Hart. It was recommended to approve the Comprehensive Guide Plari:A nendment designation from Limited Business to D-1 Single Family Residential and a Rezoning from Limited Business to R-1 Single Family for Lot 1, Block 1, Uebel Addition. P. Waiver of Plat. Duplex Lot Salit. Stephen Pemberton. It was recommended to approve a waiver of plat for a duplex lot split of Lot 4, Block 1, B 1.41:4ae•Ag0iilo:,...,... • Q. Approve Purchase and Accept Bid/Fire Safety OiiatiViiti6iler. It was recommended to accept bids and approve the purchase of a fire safety education:t'railer friii0 Duncan and Associates, Inc. R. Sign Ordinance Interpretation. Concur with Stat#i (Irectioni f':was recommended to direct staff to issue permits for Blockbuster Video,and to work with the Advisory Pl nning Commission on appropriate revisions to the sign code to clarify the intent of the building signage provisions. Wachter moved, Hunter seconded a motion to approve the consent agenda. Aye: 5 Nay: 0 • Mayor Egan reminded the members;Qt;th?:sgnce;.ttIt.there are a lot of items on the agenda and requested that people keep their commekl$.. Ie ;:, • CERTIFICATION OF DEUNQUE .)TILITY BILLS After introductions by Mayor Egan and Administrator Hedges,Mayor Egan opened the public hearing to anyone wishing to speak. There being no one wishing to speak, Mayor Egan turned discussion back EAGAN CRY COUNCIL MINUTES;MAY 2, 1995 PAGE 5 to the Council. Awada moved, Wachter*gnded a motiQt it close the public hearing and authorize certification of the final assessment roll. PROJECT 601A, FINAL ASSESSMENT HEARING, LEXINGTON AVENUE AND LONE OAK ROAD INTERSECTION RECONSTRUCTION AND SIGNALIZATION After introductions by Mayor Egan anit Adtglgiat,9 .H g , Director of Public Works Colbert gave a staff report on this project. After some i>yei ii the breakdown of assessments, Director of Public Works Colbert reviewed the assessment& those WI. Submitted objections. Mayor Egan then opened the public hearing to anyone wishing to speak. '•' Darrell Lundeen,2985 Lexington Averkga. pjAi.i prassiad his objection,noting that land was taken, and the road was placed closer to his honi T.tiBos weir'e:ieiimtived, and the median restricts their access. Two real estate appraisers have stated that their propertji'iWiis devalued as a result of the median. There is more noise, pollution and traffic. He requested to be removed from the assessment roll. RoMe Crawford, representing Malvin and Renate Rahn and Prospector's Properties/Crate Prospects, expressed their objection for the same reasons as the Lundeen's. Marlys Lundeen added that their son is a volunteer firefighter and at times carries:get out of the driveway because of the median. • There being no one else wishing to speak;::Mayor:ggan turned the discussion back to the Council. City Attorney Sheldon explained the objection process; theiti 8gtor of Public Works Colbert reviewed the people objecting and the amount of assessment: Counciirt5eir Wachter stated he doesn't see how the City can assess them when their safety is decreased;:::? iinciimember Awada stated that any time there is an upgrade to a street so that there is an:irtt teas In traffic where the purpose is an Industrial thru street, there is a benefit. These homes will evitiifilly be sold for commercial or industrial property, and any increase in traffic will increase the benefit. However,these are still homes and they are conforming uses, and she doesn't think there is any justification for assessing the homes on Lexington Avenue. Wachter added that Crate Prospects was greatly affected by the median and he feels their assessment is unjust. Councilmember Awada disagreed, stating that the increase in traffic constitutes a benefit to an industrial or commercial use. Some discussion Hunter moved,Awada seconded a motion to close t1i'i#'put llc hearing and adopt the final assessment roll, deleting the assessments for the residential pr erties tIj t;submitted an objection, the amount to be paid by the city street fund. Councilmember Masin cstioned: ttiether the assessment for Crate Prospects should be modified. She feels it will be difficult to jl tify. Mayor Egan stated he feels differently about the commercial business property than he does about the aeidential property. Aye: 5 Nay: 0 Councilmember Hunter emphasized that the reason these assessments are being deleted is because of the median. Some discussion followed concerning the difference between municipal and county state aid. VACATE DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT-BIRCH STREET After introductions by Mayor Egan and Administrator Hies, Director of Public Works Colbert gave a staff report. Mayor Egan opened the pAblI .aearigg, ,.apyope wishing to speak,and there being no one wishing to speak,turned the discussion 'O WO: d iwada moved,Wachter seconded a motion to close the public hearing and approve'tiie'vacatl`dtiiifi'draiiiage and utility easement as described in Torrens Document#105586 filed September 4, 1979, and ai*llorize its recording at Dakota County. Aye: 5 Nay: 0 • • EACAN CITY COUNCIL MINUTES; MAY 2, 1995 PAGE 6 PROJECT 681, NORTH NICC S tQ :•T EET RECONSTRUCTION After an introduction by Mayor Egan, Administrator Hedges noted that staff has met with Lester Spencer,and he generally agrees with the installation of curb and gutter,but has some concerns about the extra expenses. Community Development Director Reichert then gave a staff report. Lester Spencer, 3786 Nicols Road, has, and Indicated he would have to see the ditches before he could approve of them. tigiior Egan:;eked whether he would prefer a rural or urban design for this roadway. Mr. Spencer stated:tie was In'favor of curb and gutter until he found out how much it would cost. Director of Public Works.:Cobert exified the proposal for the ditch under the rural ditch design and the costs for concrete•euth•atj i qutter;.:Cil elderable discussion followed concerning the drainage in this area and the nature 0...S.Spence'e.p nest. Mary Ramnarine, 3785 Nicols Road, presented a letter to the Council stating they accept the iural ditch design with catch basins. Hunter moved, Masin seconded a motion to approve Project 681 and authorize the preparation of detailed plans and specifications based on a rural street design: Director of Public Works Colbert noted that because they deleted the River Valley Trail segment,they also deleted that segment of the water main, so the project that is being approved is rti 2:;the.same as originally proposed. Hunter and Masin clarified that their motion refers to the project as iioi$ffod::::Aye: 5 Nay: 0 STOP SIGN REQUEST, WILDERNESS IZl>N ROADrAND WEDGEWOOD DRIVE • Hunter moved, Wachter seconded a motion:ta on 'i is item to May 15, 1995. Aye: 5 Nay: 0 SHOWS LICENSE, YANKEE DOODLE ARTS AND CRAFTS FESTIVAL, REQUEST TO WAIVE FEES,AND VARIANCE FROM CITY CODE ON RECREATIONAL VEHICLE PARKING, YANKEE DOODLE ARTS AND CRAFTS FESTIVAL After an introduction by Mayor EgakiklipIlistg00:0040 gave a brief explanation of the request. Count lmember Masin expressed a concern about sstfirig CouncilmemberAwada concurred, noting this is a fundraising event. Mayor Egan agreigistating Olio is a nominal fee. After some discussion, • Wachter moved, Hunter seconded a motion to appcoi:e the shgatis license for the Yankee Doodle Arts and Crafts Festival, conditioned upon the receipt of apipropriate 3i*rance documentation, and denying the request to waive the fees; and approve the variance request fiit:tpereational vehicle parking for the Yankee Doodle Arts and Crafts Festival. Gary Morgan, of the Chamber of Commerce, encouraged the Council to waive the fees, thereby encouraging more of these type of events. Aye: 5 Nay: 0 PRELIMINARY PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AND PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION -FORTUNE REALTY After introductions by Mayor Egan and Administrator: # dges, Community Development Director Reichert gave a staff report on this propos4.;; ntfn;Watschlle,Fortune Realty, stated it is apparent that the neighbors don't want anything at this k oatiprt;:•1•0:Itas ta\6sad their plan many times,and the neighbors still will not support it. He urged Council Counciiriiptiroiiiil:etiatiiite, Planning Consultant for Fortune Realty, addressed neighborhood concerns and urged Council approy ; Ron Minette,of Cinema'N Drafthouse in New Hope, urgedeCouncil approval, stating they are interest in locating in Eagan. He noted they haven't had any problems with their New Hope location. Mr.Watchke • EAGAN CITY COUNCIL MINUTES;MAY 2, 1995 PAGE 7 presented a petition containing 475 names#if people who armlti favor of this project. He noted that all of the people on the petition either live or workja , en:• Gary Krueger,4532 South Mallard Trail,representing the Thomas Lake homeowners group,reiterated the reasons the neighborhood does not support this proposal. He doesn't feel the petition Is relevant because those people don't know the history of of this property. Councilmember Awada asked what he would Ike to see there. Mr. Krueger responded the neighbors would like something more compatible with a residential area, such as day care centl ::: alrf:lotf►be.r;;Masin asked why the neighborhood was unwilling to meet with Mr.Watschke agairr::::WKitigiii•ASPOitiid that the residents didn't feel there was any reason to meet because the Cinema Grill wasi:;ill being: posed and they are opposed to it. He Indicated he did meet with Mr.Watschke;however,Mr.WatschWie'indicated he was going to go ahead with the project as proposed. Bob Knudson, 1629 Walnut Lane,in# ted:1Te is o pb t'for the same reasons Mr. Krueger stated. Sandy Unger, 4542 South Mallard Trail, indicated she feels the two story office building is inappropriate. She feels the office building should be located where the theater is being proposed. Councilmember Awada stated the theater seems to be the problem with the neighbors. Mr.Watschke responded that he doesn't think that changing the use is going to alleviate the concerns of the neighbors. They want to put the theater in because:Cin is 'N Drafthouse wants to be in Eagan and they feel they have the site for it. Councilmember Hunter asked what the city's options ire'with the expired planned development. City Attorney Sheldon indicated the planned development cannot:b :terminated until a public hearing is held and the appropriate zoning determined. The zoning:;do$sin'tciiiinl9e.unless specific action is taken.The proposal meets the requirements of the zone and it:0 ;a pesiriitted use within the current zone. Mayor Egan asked whether the city has the right to change khg'zone, and City Attorney Sheldon indicated they do. Mayor Egan stated he feels the objection isn't so much to the type of use, but the intensity. The Council can regulate the intensity., The Council needs to be sensitive to the residential nature of the surrounding area. Councilmember Wachter stated he feels this proposal is too intensive. He feels traffic will be a problem if this goes in. Councilmember Masip.cR lourxe .. taiipg the Council needs to get the health club Cow to provide more parking for its customers: gn :ltgr stated he thinks the biggest objection is the night use, not the theater. Councilmember Wactite'r'disagreed, indicating there is a parking problem during the day as well. Members of the neighbordod conctifred. Discussion followed concerning the nature of the parking problem and how it can be a31e!iilated. O iisiderable discussion followed concerning what intensity is appropriate for this property and:.54.ifiether rgoning this property to Limited Business or modifying the planned development district would be appropfe. Hunter moved,Wachter seconded a motion to deny the preliminary subdivision for Safari at Eagan 3rd Addition due to the fact that the proposal is too intense for the area. Aye: 5 Nay: 0 Hunter moved, Awada seconded a motion to direct the City Attorney to prepare findings of fact on the denial. Aye: 5 Nay: 0 Hunter moved,Wachter seconded a,motiois::t941.000lanning Commission to hold a public hearing to terminate the planned development.' {Ofigi iclidatOihe would like the flexibility of allowing the applicant to come up with an acceptabfe're ii g lon'f0'ttie'''platiiied development district. Councilmember Hunter accepted this as a friendly amendment, but only for::t9 area under this proposal. Aye: 5 Nay: 0 • EAGAN CITY COUNCIL MINUTES; MAY 2 1995 PAGE 8 COMPREHENSIVE GUIDE PLAN AMENDMENT AND REZONING SOUTH Ik''St AARA COGAN After introductions by Mayor Egan and Administrator Hedges, Community Development Director Reichert gave a staff report. She gave a development history of this area and explained the options available. Councilmember Hunter stated that the theigrXifiomp:pmictpypeat Commission and Planning Commission took a lot of testimony and evaluated this sfaatiiiit:Fe& i :Tiieji. a up with some good recommendations. He feels residential zoning is too long-term. He feeliany busilisiss owners are willing to pursue a planned development. He indicated that another option is to.Create a heVJ limited industrial zoning that would be compatible with residential uses. >: Councilmember Wachter stated he faalli:#hfrg:Ed spi0ianit1g'and expressed a concern about lead from the gun club contaminating the water supply. Councilmember Awada noted that the gun club was there first, and people chose to move there. When the land becomes valuable enough, it will be sold. She commended the Planning Commission for their work on this. Mayor Egan concurred, and indicated he doesn't favor rezoning the gun club at this time. He does favor coming up with a new limited industrial zon . Discussion followed concerning the three acres on the Rosemount border. Community Development Director Reichert suggested it could be zzsiig4;agricultural until there is a proposal for development of the property, Rollie Crawford, representing the West Erici:Gun Cluti;.ilid'icated they would like their property left as it is. He feels they are private open space and should:ka;kept that way. Bill Schittz, 4860 Biscayne Avenue, indicated he supports the new zoniii ::': 'im Czajai;'4709 Stratford Lane, stated he feels the proposed modified plan is a nice comprQr:i i..ti: iowever, the gun club is a problem. The area has a residential character. Bob Hosch,a Board:iniitliber of West End Gun Club,reviewed the hours of operation and type of activity that takes place at the gun club. He indicated they are trying to be good neighbors. They limit their membership and number of teams. They aren't recruiting new members and aren't looking to increase their activities. Some discussion followed concerning lead levels in the water supply in that area. Gary Morgan,a member of the Econoiuikbavkiii0.en€:Gommission,indicated he supports restrictions on what can go in there. He is concerned about the.PUD proposal and how much it will cost the applicants. John Young,4870 Biscayne Avenue,expressed cor erns abo t;3. a architectural standards. He noted that 80%of the property in this area is fully developed. Ma SuggesteiCthat the property owners in this area meet with staff and work out some of these issues. I•titiaxpressetl: ome concerning about rezoning this to Research and Development. Councilmember Hunter clarified!:that he is proposing a zone similar to Research and Development, but more intense. Mayor Egan indicated that he feels this has been a good process, but he feels it is time to move forward on this. He feels that straight zoning would be better than planned development, because there would have to be consensus with a planned development and that would be difficult. Jerry Segal, a member of the Planning Commission stud that staff has done an excellent job and feels they deserve credit for coming up, •gowd;•nitema$vs:s;,for this area. Jim Oberg, owner of some property in the area, expressed concerri8: t;: :,:ii*tit zor%ttq. He would like a decision made on this tonight. Councilmembers indicated that unless it is'ioned'to'rfsidential,ft will take some time to come up with an appropriate zoning for this area. Discussion followecp*ceming how long it will take to implement a new zoning classification. Councilmember Hunter sugges#ei that the Council hold a workshop to come up with appropriate zoning for the area north of the gun club. EAGAN CITY COUNCIL MINUTES;MAY 2, 1995 .... .... ..... PAGE 9 Hunter moved, Masin seconded a moddn tq,direct the.P aiming Commission to hold a public hearing • on the rezoning of the area south of the gun abi:#,p;egrtot tisel. Aye: 5 Nay: 0 • Wachter moved, Awada seconded a motion to direct staff to initiate a feasibility study for the installation of public improvements to serve the areas currently zoned industrial. Aye: 5 Nay: 0 Administrator Hedges recognized Ron Voracek for his work on this project. PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION ANp:::14 ;1.. :tirAW.151;3 PLAN/CENTEX REAL ESTATE After introductions by Mayor Egan and Adntrator I, es, Community Development Director Reichert gave a staff report on this project. Dan Blake,a representative of Centex Homes, concurred with the staff recommendation; however, he is concerjd about*:conditions that tie into the neighboring development in the event that property do .d velo0;.:D s ss on followed concerning temporary access and the conditions to the subdivision. Wachter moved,Masin seconded a motion to approve a preliminary subdivision and multi-family site plan for Centex Real Estate,located in the Southwest 1/4 of Section 17,subject to the following conditions: 1. Standard conditions of plat approval Al, B1, B2, 83, B4, Cl, C2, C3, C4, DI, El, Fl, G1, and H1 as adopted by Council action on: i 41;uary 2, 1993. 2. Units located within Lots 7-10, Block 4 shaf:460 approved with a 25' front building setback. •• 3. Private access drives are allowed to be:constructed to a 20' back of curb to back of curb width. 4. The guest parking areas shall pr,Qi i0:0:Xl8'stalls and be surfaced with bituminous and edged with concrete curb and gutter. 5. Tree preservation replacement trees shall be identified on the Landscape Plan. 6. The Landscape Plan shall be revised to provide a more diverse shade tree selection and a higher percentage of the proposed evet r'ppf:y0 ;tl :ta•buffer the site from Highway 13. 7. The Developer shall submit detailed plags.•.and specifications for the proposed retaining wall construction prior to final subdivision approval. 8. The wetland replacement shall be providediai :shown 0:8he wetland replacement plan dated March 17, 1995. • 9. The Developer shall extend the 15"storm sewer line to the edge of the southwestern wetland to prevent future erosion from occurring at the outlet of the 15" line. 10. The extension of the 8" watermain will be require# Cross Highway 13 and connecting to the existing 16"watermain before occupancy of any seeiiid or third phase dwelling unit. 11. If this project develops prior to the;$atiacc I Uf 4 y opment,the developer will be responsible for providing southerly access to Highway 13 prior to occupancy of any Phase 2 or Phase 3 dwelling units. 12. Appropriate public right-of-way width shall be determined prior to City Council action on the Final Subdivision. • I 1 2 EACAN CITY COUNCIL MINUTES;MAY 2, 1995 ••••• "" PAGE 10 13. The developer shall dedicate restriil ad;•access alocig Highway 13. 14. Highway 13/Seneca Road access shall :pi`biidei!prior to final platting the areas designated as Phase 2 and Phase 3 on the preliminary plat. 15. The cost of any modificationslmprovements associated with this shared access point shall be born by the benefiting properties. 16. The Developer shall provide tree"'protec o▪ *ii easut : .e. 4 foot polyethylene laminate safety netting)to be installed at the Drip Line or antis permm kir of the Critical Root Zone, whichever is greater, of the significant trees/woodlands.tc.be preseyed. 17. The Developer shall contact the Cj►:Pe▪ try:. ;iilit least five days prior to any site grading to ensure compliance with the apPiiiied'Yree P ivation Plan. 18. This development is subject to a cash park,trail, and water quality dedication. 19. The Developer shall provide some informal play opportunities In designated open areas. 20. The Developer shall be respor ::;for,preparing and recording, with the plat, appropriate documents establishing a Homeotiviiet5'•::Asspc ation. The documents must be submitted and approved by the City Attorney's office pridi to:ftr 1; itat approval. Transfers of common areas to the Homeowners'Association shall bel;recorded vi►itt;tha.plat. 21. The Developer shall be responsible.:•fio ptepaiiiipr and recording, with the plat, easements for Ingress and egress. The easemenpt ::iiiiiiittbe submitted and approved by the City Attorney's office prior to final subdivision approvar''' . 22. If this project develops prior to Seneca Hills project,the Developer will be responsible for providing a temporary cul-de-sac at the south end of the public street serving this development. 23. The developer shall plat the sutiivfsfpir;:. Aye: 5 Nay: 0 • PREUMINARY SUBDIVISIONiAND MULThFAMILY SITE PLAN LOA INVESTMENT GOO Masin moved, Hunter seconded a motion to table this to May 15, 1995. Aye: 5 Nay: 0 ORDINANCE AMENDMENT,ARCHITECTURAL STANDARDS IN I-1 DISTRICTS After introductions by Mayor Egan and Administrator4dges, Community Development Director Reichert gave a staff report on this, reviewing standards other cities. She indicated that if the Council wants to adopt a more flexible a pp.i:i0 w4h 40.iggisting buildings to allow them to expand, the Council could add the language : i iti i i n D. She noted there is also an optional provision that accessory structures can be metal if a conditional use permit is obtained, which would be decided on a case by case basis. Councilmember Hunth tated he favors the additional language regarding expansion of existing buildings,but not the Ianguags4or accessory structures. Awada and Egan concurred. Councilmember Wachter noted that the ordinance doesn't address poured concrete. Community Development Dir ctor Reichert indicated that would be up to staff interpretation. EAGAN CITY COUNCIL MINUTES; MAY 2, 1995 PAGE 11 Jim Wisnoski, of Lull Industries, ro4uf0ed a cletig0tion on the ordinance and Community Development Director Reichert gave an expressed his concerns over this ordinance and how it will affect his expansion. 'F r n..feel painted block and metal exteriors should be prohibited. Mayor Egan noted that none of the other cities that were surveyed allow those finishes. Mr. W isnoski expressed a concern over the delay on his expansion because of this ordinance. Administrator Hedge noted that if this ordinance is passed tonight,the building permit can be issued tomorrow,assuming it meets all other criteria. Romney Scarp,Production Parts, Iris:asked pbbut'wha l happen to existing metal buildings if this ordinance is passed. Mayor Egan indicated they::would be::tiandfathered in. Mr Scarp asked about expansion of these buildings. Community Developent Direcor Reichert explained that the expansion would have to be built with an acceptable material..the exie ti metal building would have to be brought up to code. Mr. Scarp expressed his con4t0i QVe4tis,':tnd dating these businesses would lose value because they can't grow or sell the buildiri}:'.Coiincilme> :Awada indicated these businesses can grow; they just need to bring the building up to standard. Mr. Scarp stated that would not be economically feasible. Councilmember Awada noted that people have to upgrade all the time; this is the same philosophy. She feels standards need to be kept high. Councilmember Wachter stated he;;feels expansion of existing metal buildings should be allowed. Discussion followed concerning what woiilit03:Allowed under this ordinance for expansion of existing metal buildings. Councilmember Awada stated•site dgi sn't.feel this ordinance is unreasonable. If this passes, these standards would be even lower than the,suriii itt0ijp::communities. John Young concurred with Mr. Scarp '1•#>is:::o dinance will be detrimental to business. Councilmember Awada stated she doesn't think :is::fairrto allow existing metal buildings to be expanded when new businesses coming into the cdiiixjirrrltiiire being told they can't put up a metal building. She reiterated that she feels this ordinance Is•Yeasonable. Mr. Young stated that this ordinance will result in stagnant, declining businesses because the growing, thriving businesses won't be able to work it out economically. He added that Minnesota businesses have high energy,tax and building costs,and his metal building is much more energy efficient than concrete buildings are. Councilmember Wachter noted that the concrete buildings that are built today are much more energy efficient due to new technology. Mayor Egan noted that the city is yfiri iii slob sfi;iriiifafis. These standards can be changed, but this is a starting point. Mike Greaser, of Gresser Concrete Masonr*stated heittoesn't feel the Council should rule out any building material. No one on the Council has a bacltound irx i. nstruction,and they should listen to those that do. The Council should not be telling builders how to build a building. He feels there is too much • regulation. He feels it is unreasonable to hold up the expansion of Lull Industries because of this ordinance. He feels Eagan has a reputation among businesses as being uncooperative. Mayor Egan stated that although Mr.Gresser's professional input in invaluable,he doesn't think that those that have a strong vested interested in the outcome of this ordinance should be the.• res deciding what building materials are appropriate. He is willing to review the language, but this is Otirting point. Mr.Gresser disagreed,stating he feels this should not be decided by people with no experrertce with construction. Councilmember Hunter noted that#lie iii Aipi i 1s $it him are the people who set his standards. He is pro-business, but when it comes to building standards,.the people who set the standards are the people of Eagan. The Council needs to weigh that against tthl :burden that places on business. The people he has spoken to do not like metal buildings. He doesn't feefihis Is overregulating. This ordinance will set standards,but it can still be fine tuned. Councilmember Awada noted that this was started by industrial real estate brokers who indicated they felt standards needed to be set. Mayor Egan added that the Council • EAGAN CITY COUNCIL MINUTES;MAY 2, 1995 •••• •• f PAGE 12 makes many decisions that are binding on tf4Ognmunity on•wrbjaicts that they are not experts in,but make those decisions based on advice and counsef:,eo i:;physical engineers and experts in that field. They surveyed a number of other cities on this stif 16 4;ilid metal and painted concrete buildings are not allowed in any of those cities. Mr.Gresser continue to disagree,stating the Council should listen to those who know the business. Discussion followed. Councilmember Masin noted that whisn.fhe;Council was discussing the southeast area of Eagan, a lot of comments were made about the iiiiiiiiiiiii Many people were saying that those buildings were "downright ugly", so there is'a'.rie0jOitiiitWiin about metal buildings. A lot of the discussion was about the condition of the buildings;n t about:1i land use. Don McTeague, Lehman's Garage, Indicated indicat4thay have. metal building, and are in the process of dividing the property to put up a second tiiiitla Councilmember Hunter indicated he is not concerned about small expansions; his main concern is with major expansions. After some discussion, Hunter moved, Awada seconded a motion approve the ordinance amendment to Chapter 11 entitled Land Use Regulations "Zoning"by amending Section 11.10 regarding regulations on industrial building exterior surfaces and by adopting, by reference, Eagan City Code Chapter 1 and Section 11.99, striking,the following language: "An exterior, exposed side or surface:of lip :;aepa,ssory structure to an industrial building may be constructed of more than 25% of metal materiaf;:ind :cam}vinyl,steel,sheet or corrugated aluminum or Iron, provided a conditional use permIfs first otitainad:•from the City."; and that language be added to state that existing: ioii oohfomiing metal buildings can be expanded 50% or 10,000 square feet, whichever is less;:;:.$die::::5"Nay: 0 Councilmember Awada stated she feels it is wrong to hold someone up for a building *permit just because the city is considering a change to an ordinance. Administrator Hedges noted that the ordinance was intact when the request was made. Staff . could not deviate from the regulatory language of the ordinance. After some discussion, Councilmember Hunter suggested that any time there is an ordinance change pertaining to building materials or something similar, a letter should be sent to everyone who has applied for a building permit so they can find out how it will affect them and attend the public hedi ii 1110: Olir,:::SSoome discussion followed concerning whether those who have applied should be exeriipted•fiiiitriiprosad: tidinance revisions. ORDINANCE AMENDMENT REG )ING DEFINITION OF SETBACKS After an introduction by Mayor Egan, Awadiinoved,4inter seconded a motion to approve the • ordinance amendment to Chapter 11 of the Zoning Code,Sectiiirr'11.03(78)regarding Definition of Setback and by adopting by reference, Eagan City Code, Chapter 1, and Section 11.99. A clarification was requested by Councilmember Hunter regarding parking areas. Aye: 5 Nay: 0 REQUEST BY LULL INDUSTRIES TO WAlV ;CONNECTION CHARGES After introductions by Mayor Egan and Administrator kedges, Jim Wisnoski of Lull Industries, gave the history of his request, stating that thi ::Is just fvf;giffitgilncy purposes. It is not for drinking water, sewer, etc. It Is just for a fire hydrant. should be the obligation of the previous owner of this building. Mayor Egan noted that when the representative of Lull Industries called the city,the employee didn't have all of the paperwork, and therefore,;::wrong figure was given. Therefore, the Council needs to decide whether there was a hardship created:.by this misrepresentation. Councilmember Awada noted that the financial obligation goes with the property, not the owner. Mayor Egan concurred. • S EAGAN CITY COUNCIL MINUTES;MAY 2,1995 PAGE 13 Councilmember Hunter asked whethiii4 a•oity has eyet Oiiiied these fees before. Director of Public Works Colbert noted there was one situation i1'he; tli aJ*t Oiiissessment was deferred until such time as they hooked up to the system. After consIderatilikkaiiiiitiii,Wachter moved,Awada seconded a motion to defer the connection charge until Lull Industries connects to the water system for active use, and that an agreement be drafted to reflect that. Aye: 5 Nay: 0 • /::�':..s�j j:�i:/.: ,%ice: ;i';i% �i;'C�' .f:/;:ice: �; �4:, 'e•://G• Mayor Egan gave an update on the fill(iini'iip ill L, is'fatti? ::iwommission Board meeting he attended relative to the Livable Communities Act. Counciliiiiiinber Hiip er noted he spoke with Representative Pawlenty, and he agrees with the Governor on this:.issue. Some discussion followed. WarillegrAPAPIN Rollie Crawford, representing Home Development relative to the Kingswood 3rd Addition, noted they submitted their application and was informed by staff that the tree preservation ordinance is in effect. They would like to be exempt from this ordinance. After some discussion, Wachter moved,Awada seconded a motion to allow an exemption from the tree preservation ordinance for Kingswood 3rd Addition. Aye: 5 Nay: 0 • Mike Gresser, Gresser Concrete iiiiasQfity;:;exprsssed a concern about the engineering costs• associated with Project 661 R. He asked a.number: :;questions relative to the administrative and engineering fees. He stated he feels the city is;inking miiney:AR these fees and they will protest this. He noted he requested these figures seven months:apo::andj st received them. He feels he was lied to by the City Engineer and doesn't like the way.:h:.:00. ates:••Mayor Egan told Mr. Gresser that this is an inappropriate discussion for a Council meq i aiiii'declared him to be out of order. Mr.Greaser stated that in fight of the lack of trust in government, he feels this warrants an investigation. Councilmember Hunter suggested that the Public Works Committee review the engineering fees on this project. Some discussion followed concerning when the Public Works Committee will meet. Director of Public Works Colbert noted that:;Yankee;.Doodle Road will be closed to traffic for reconstruction starting Monday. Community Development Director Reichert iridkiated stgt#snet with Opus and they are making some revisions to the plan and would Mks to meet again. She asked'viihether the Council wants a representative • there. Councilmember Awada indicated she will attend. Community Development Director Reichert indicated the Council should discuss their vision for this area in the near future. Discussion followed. Administrator Hedges indicated he received a request from District*197 to waive the fees for Trapp Farm Park for an event on May 18 from 5 to 8 p.m. Councfinmbers concurred to not waive the fees. Administrator Hedges noted they st ; s:plbe ;AtfpDerviewing for fiscal consultants and asked whether the Council wants to have a the interviews. The Council didn't feel it was necessary. Councilmember Awada gave an update on the meeting with the Caponi's. She noted that Administrator Hedges will draft a letter to them outlining several options. Councilmembers reiterated that the City will not give him any money. • EAGAN CITY COUNCIL MINUTES;MAY 2, 1995 •••• • PAGE 14 Administrator Hedges asked when tha:00RO wants.t9;Obuss the zoning for the Southeast industrial area Discussion followed concerning Mr • • Wachter moved, Egan seconded a motion to approve the check register dated April 28, 1995 in the amount of$1,030,902.38. Aye: 5 Nay: • The meeting adjourned at 1:40 a.m. on May:; :•;1995. ..;:;:;;;; • DLP Date City Clerk If you need these minutes in an alternative formAtioffiii:lifi*print, braille, audio tape, etc.,please contact the City of Eagan, 3830 Pilot Knob Road, Ea*, MN 5514012) 681-4600, (TDD phone: (612) 454- 8535) • The City of Eagan is committed to the poll:01'4ra persons have-equal access to its programs, services, activities, facilities and employment withbut regard to race, color, creed, religion, national origin, sex, disability, age, marital status or status with regard to public assistance. •••••••• • Agenda Information Memo May 15, 1995 Eagan City Council Meeting There are twenty-two (22) items on the agenda referred to as consent items requiring one (1) motion by the City Council. If the City Council wishes to discuss any of the items in further detail, those items should be removed from the Consent Agenda and placed under Old or New Business unless the discussion required is brief. A. PERSONNEL ITEMS Item 1. Civic Arena Manager -- ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: To approve the hiring of Todd Burkart as the Civic Arena Manager. FACTS: After interviews, it is the recommendation of City Administrator Hedges, Director of Parks and Recreation Vraa, Recreation Superintendent Peterson and Assistant to the City Administrator Duffy that Todd Burkart be hired as the Civic Arena Manager. Item 2. Seasonal Recreation Program Assistant -- ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: To approve the hiring of Robert Hodgman as a temporary, seasonal, part-time Summer Recreation Program Assistant. FACTS: After interviews, it is the recommendation of Recreation Supervisor Oyanagi that Robert Hodgman be hired as a temporary, seasonal, part-time Summer Recreation Program Assistant. Item 3. Seasonal, Part-Time Maintenance/Youth Development Program -- ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: To approve the hiring of Antar Washington as a seasonal, part-time maintenance worker for the Youth Development Program. I Agenda Information Memo May 15, 1995 Eagan City Council Meeting FACTS: After interviews, it is the recommendation of Youth Development Coordinator Ashley that Antar Washington be hired as a seasonal, part-time maintenance worker for the Youth Development Program. Item 4. Temporary Engineering Intern -- ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: To approve the hiring of Brian Blair as a temporary Engineering Intern. FACTS: After interviews, it is the recommendation of Senior Engineering Tech/Supervisor Kirscht that Brian Blair be hired as a temporary Engineering Intern. Item 5. Reorganization/Public Works Department -- ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: To approve the reorganization of the Public Works Department, including the reclassification of Kelley Janes to Utility Operation/Maintenance Supervisor, the reclassification of Paul Heuer to Systems Analyst, the creation of a Water Treatment Tech/Supervisor position, the reclassification of Dale Ronning to Engineering Technician and the reclassification of Nancy Bailey to Office Supervisor/Central Services Maintenance. FACTS: In conjunction with City Administrator Hedges, Director of Public Works Colbert has made an in-depth study as to how the Public Works Department should be organized in order to most effectively and efficiently provide services to the various customers it serves. The study was prompted by the continuous increase in infrastructure, customer service workload, changing technology and the anticipation of the future needs of the community. It is their recommendation that the Public Works Department undergo a reorganization. BACKGROUND/ATTACHMENTS: Summary of Public Works Department reorganization - page 3 . 4c3\ Agenda Information Memo May 15, 1995 Eagan City Council Meeting SUMMARY OF PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT REORGANIZATION Utilities Division: It is recommended that the Utility Division be reorganized into a Water Production section and a Utility Operation/Maintenance Section. Each of these sections will have a designated supervisor reporting directly to the Utility Superintendent. In addition, there will be a new position, System Analyst, reporting directly to the Utility Superintendent and providing administrative, research, purchasing, budget and analysis support to the division as a whole. The current Water Operations Supervisor, Paul Heuer, will be appointed System Analyst and the current Sewer Supervisor, Kelley Janes, will be appointed Utilities Operation/Maintenance Supervisor. The vacant Water Production Technician/Supervisor position will be advertised and filled through the City's hiring procedures. Because of a vacancy in a Utility Maintenance Worker position, there will be no net increase in the number of positions in that division. The Time Spent Profiles (TSP) indicate that the Utilities Operations Supervisor position falls in the Exempt J range,which is currently where both supervisors' positions fall. However, the TSPs for the Water and Systems Analyst positions indicate a reduction of one wage range, down to Exempt I range. There is no adjustment required to the 1995 budget due to this reorganization. Engineering Division: After analysis, it was felt that the current Engineering Aide position description no longer accurately reflected the duties performed by Dale Ronning. In addition, he is needed to perform the more complicated duties as done by Engineering Technicians. Therefore, it is recommended that the Engineering Division be reorganized from one Engineering Aide and three Engineering Technician positions to four Engineering Technician positions. This reorganization has been accounted for in the 1995 budget as approved by Council and no change will be needed in the budget. Central Services Maintenance: Central Services Maintenance provides support services to six division operations (Streets, Utilities, Parks, Forestry, Water Resources and Equipment Maintenance) within two department (Public Works and Parks and Recreation), as well as serving as the main receptionist area for the public at the maintenance facility. With the various maintenance divisions increasing their efficiency and programs through technological upgrades, an increase in public interaction as a satellite government center and increased clerical workloads, an additional Clerical Technician III position was approved for 1995 in the budget and has been filled. The duties of the secretary/supervisor in Central Services have become more administrative and supervisory. Therefore,the position is recommended to be reclassified as Office Supervisor/Central Services Maintenance. This is similar to the Office Supervisor position in the Police Department. The TSP for the position indicates an increase of one pay range. This amount has been accounted for in the 1995 budget as approved by Council. If the Council wishes to see any or all of the new job descriptions, please contact Assistant to the City Administrator Duffy. ■....3 Agenda Information Memo May 15, 1995 Eagan City Council Meeting Item 6. Reorganization/Planning Division/Community Development Department -- ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: To approve the reorganization of the Planning Division of the Community Development Department, including the elimination of the City Planner position, the creation of an additional Senior Planner position and an Associate Planner position, and the reclassification of the current Project Planner positions to Planner positions. FACTS: In conjunction with City Administrator Hedges, Director of Community Development Reichert has made an in-depth study as to how the Planning Division should be organized in order to most effectively and efficiently provide services to the various customers it serves. The study was prompted by the increased responsibilities of the division and the resignation of the City Planner. It is customary following resignations to consider possible reorganization in order to operate more effectively. It is their recommendation that the Planning Division of the Community Development Department undergo a reorganization. BACKGROUND/ATTACHMENTS: Summary of Planning Division reorganization - page Agenda Information Memo May 15, 1995 Eagan City Council Meeting SUMMARY OF PLANNING DIVISION REORGANIZATION It is the belief of the Director of Community Development and the City Administrator that the current double layer of management as provided by both a Director of Community Development and a City Planner is unnecessary. They believe that a flatter organization is needed, one in which individual staff members work together in project-oriented, supportive teams and take on a variety of assignments. In order to provide the division with the needed flexibility and skills, it is recommended that a professional growth ladder be established of a series of planner positions. At each level, the general range of job duties would be the same, but the complexity and diversity of assignments would increase along with the degree of independent judgment exercised. These levels would be Associate Planner (entry level), Planner and Senior Planner. The Senior Planner positions will be responsible for coordinating one or more of the major functions of the Planning Division, economic development, development review, long range planning, and assisting the department director in the general administration of the division. Currently, the City has one City Planner position, one Senior Planner position, two Project Planner positions, one Planner position and various intern/sign inspector positions. For 1995, it is recommended that these positions be reorganized into two Senior Planner positions, three Planner positions and one Associate Planner position. Funding for the two new positions (Senior Planner and Associate Planner) would actually be a cost savings in the 1995 budget, given the elimination of the City Planner position and funding allocations for other vacant positions. The positions would be advertised and filled through the City's hiring procedures. Note: The reclassification of the Project Planner positions requires no budget adjustment; it is merely a title change. Agenda Information Memo May 15, 1995 Eagan City Council Meeting Item 7. Resignation -- Development/Design Engineer -- ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: To accept the letter of resignation from John Wingard, Development/Design Engineer. FACTS: The City has received a letter of resignation from John Wingard, Development/Design Engineer. Mr. Wingard has accepted the Assistant City Engineer position with the City of Prior Lake. BACKGROUND/ATTACHMENTS: . A letter of resignation - page 9 . ■ May 1, 1995 Thomas Colbert, P.E. , Director of Public Works Michael Foertsch, P.E., Assistant City Engineer City of Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55122 Dear Tom & Mike: I have accepted an offer from the City of Prior Lake to be their Assistant City Engineer. This letter serves as written notice of resignation with a two week notice. Therefore, my last day of employment with the City of Eagan will be May 19, 1995. I am grateful for the opportunities and challenges that the City of Eagan has given me over the past six years as a City employee, and the prior three years as a consultant to the City. It has been very rewarding to be involved in the development and growth of the City of Eagan. It is not only one of the fastest growing metropolitan communities, it is one with high standards of development that I am proud to have been a part of. As you know, I have been a resident of the City of Prior Lake for over seven years, and have been active on the Lake Advisory and Watershed committees. The City of Prior Lake is on the threshold of major growth and development, and I am pleased I will be able to offer my expertise gained from my employment with the City of Eagan to promote this. Sincerely, 9teiN 11ALTAT-A-1-- . . John P. Wingard, P.E. • Dev lopment/Development Engineer . JPW/cw cc: T. H dges, City Administrator H. Duffy, Assistant t City Administrator r7 --.s.-. _ Agenda Information Memo May 15, 1995 Eagan City Council Meeting B. PLUMBERS LICENSES ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: To approve a plumber's license for Dave's Professional Plumbing. FACTS: This application is in order for consideration by the Council at this time. r) Agenda Information Memo May 15, 1995 Eagan City Council Meeting C. FINAL APPROVAL - COMPREHENSIVE GUIDE PLAN AMENDMENT, REZONING, AND PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION - MALLARD PARK 4TH ADDITION ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: 1. To approve the Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment from D-111 Mixed Residential and RB (Roadside Business) to D-1 Single Family for approximately 38 acres located south of Diff ley Road between I-35E and Johnny Cake Ridge Road. 2. To approve the Rezoning from R-4 and RB to R-1 for approximately 38 acres of the same property. 3. To approve a Preliminary Subdivision of approximately 52 acres for 63 single family lots on 33.01 acres (Mallard Park 4th Addition) and Variances to cul-de-sac lengths and two outlots on 13.08 acres subject to the 23 conditions recommended by the Advisory Planning Commission located east of I-35E, south of Diffley Road, on either side of Johnny Cake Ridge Road. FACTS: • At its meeting of March 21, 1995, the City Council approved this Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment subject to Met Council review. The Council also indicated that if the Plan Amendment was approved, the Rezoning and Preliminary Subdivision approval would also be in order. • The Metropolitan Council has now reviewed this Comp. Guide Amendment and determined it has no potential impact upon any of the metropolitan system plans. Therefore, the City may place the amendment into effect immediately. BACKGROUND/ATTACHMENTS: (4) Correspondence from Metropolitan C it - page APC minutes - pages through (f Rezoning map - page Preliminary Plat map - page �� . M tropolitan Council Working for the Region, Planning for the Future T ECEl nt® April 25, 1995 APR 1 ? 1995 Mr. Mike Ridley City of Eagan Municipal Center 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan MN 55122 RE: City of Eagan Land Use Designation Change From Mixed Residential to Single Family--33 Acres Metropolitan Council District 15 Metropolitan Council Referral File No. 16142-1 Dear Mr. Ridley: The Metropolitan Council staff has reviewed the city of Eagan's plan amendment received by the Council on March 31, 1995. The amendment proposes to change the land use designation on 33 acres from mixed residential to single family residential. We have determined that the proposed amendment has no potential impact upon any of the metropolitan system plans. Therefore, the city may place the amendment into effect immediately. Because the proposed amendment appears unlikely to affect policies and plans in other chapters of the Metropolitan Development Guide, the Council will waive further review and comment on this amendment. The amendment, explanatory materials supplied and the information submission form will be appended to the city's plan in the Council's files. This concludes the Council's review. Sincerely, Chuck Ballen e Director CB:ret cc: Kevin Howe, Metropolitan Council District 15 Lynda Voge, Metropolitan Council Staff Richard Thompson, Metropolitan Council Staff 230 East Fifth Street St,Paul,Minnesota 55101-1634 (612) 291-6359 Fax 291-6550 Ti)D/TTY 291.0904 Metro Info Line 229-3780 An Equal OPPortunn9 enliknyer • I •1; `t+ili'• 1�1r,.1' , slJif f t,I sI. I:1'iir .:j'•ri i n triiii ' ija;l; l.JI i1't 1' i .•z r r , 1 . 1 r . 116111 •l.rJ I0 ,t/1'� 111 1+ t ,:•,J i•, ; i; • •J •1 �I 1 Ji �1ti i' 11/ 11 • i rEJ1 i+�11� t ;J ,.j 11�J �I.•r• t��+1 tf 1: s J�J• t : ' 1 j I• +E+Jit.I+ij•.i!•1 ti 11 •1 /1! g� ;J{ •;i,1 ,,•lj 1i ,,l•JIa ills iii•. j,{ I 1 � �+_ , .. + , + � ., E + t� r1 .tiril,ii. 11. I si il.111 • '1 111 +1 i M J t 1, H J + 1 .tfs1+0;1.10 11 + • 1 1 J.+ Iii t t.,11 Mt 1 , III ,1 J •���!j' .! li • l.tl, . jf, + j •j ; j ! ��jJt'+�• ! f�` pi t • 1 i 1 i 1� !f �tl;J t '� li11,r,, �1,+1,1 +a J1''� I�;irt!'11,1i'Jt '. f ii i. +I. n ,t, .� i.g, +JtJ+J it t• 14101 '!1 ,1iJli! ' '1';'•• 1 T11J 1 i •. 1 �! J i l:111011 1 +. • j I 13 �; ,s} ,• 1.011. t +1til.,.t11 i 1,•;si+ is-]1�taii`.11 /J:l1 i1.gJt� .h; .t 1111. 1+ I ffj t!•1!i1 i` i' ;1•�/J! /,•;�/t! !:+ ;i1 i1+ rllj' Ii j I gi:i tJ1t.i1JlI hi.rl Ji.j,1IJ.11J11�i11i..Jl�st.�il.1.s�tl,�t,Isttl1i1ilI.�.tt.ejt.JJl1 }� ;tE: I . ■'a IMew11.I=17 O . I •i• •..•�� ,Y�..... .J M .wyl. •. c < ..7..........] . Wil ; i I 4 1 ; . 'll all ' .... I 14 - .) 1 _. . El I; ,:----. i I .Q.a) - ..... kr ° t 3 : 'I 1 t i I 41 E ti *4- `•• ge I i I .:::" • ■-.. -• • ;1 ...' ; b / 44,:.', .„ •t ..V I I •! ` * !In 1 i 1 Illii I II'1 i is 1 hi I ._ til \sk--- —. , — ��wMwwN•wa�• N :1— 1.. .Iwl ; i 0 $1 ie I i i , N4tiop 3 \\ J1, �� t M1 J Ii. \ ms' ! i1. II 1 i ��! � � K \ . Dili ••• I o s - "1 �•• .\......\-- , .• A ICY. .I,I�I7I 117 I 1.1 ' moll. ; . 1• •wmnisImo� '� I '/ 1 f• Ir�1lI w1, r _• •• 0I— I i 1 I _ I N Iii' 4Nbflh lei i ilftli ,� l llii t I ;t��i •11� ' I' i(tl! �. . •.«...• ! Le 11' •• .ipol1.1fh�• I�hj '�'I�r ,,l'1..1,it++64 ],•p1`;! �•j ] 'ir .... 1 ui� it I iliti+y+ .`] i .) 1 N]]l•�111 1' )1••!] ]]`•�1 '1 ]f]i) (1� I I i • is II 11101!1• lil�l� 1 "i'i°Aii11t:1! :'.r'Iipi !flIPJilifløitI ii r I1 h Cir N ;'1 u�! 1!I III; pus 1..11. 4 • • I;1�3�!i _ • • • •• • • •r• •• i I Is • ....tom t...,.... li... .. ta..at .. — —I r • � —rr— 7I . i 4 11 i ill j ale*71/ • .. i AY ', 11 I Atdr . . icolik . . ., I III WS 11 4N/4•• . 1,4 el , ill 4411141, 0.\ 1 i fail;,, h • 3t* \ I kt'� \ 1 di .I �•�, v 7 : \ I i. s: �g ; • - � • 4\ ! iii id I\.,• _ �v .1 Sj \ ! l 0 111 . , S/ ` .'1 >� • ' '1 •i1 �1 i 11'1+4 : • 1 4+; *- %,1 I. ç .._� t EL ., • • % # .% : - Oil .‘.---.1 __.1 Liti g I ! • v . \•• itarbilOalt jr:10 17 ----, 1 I 0 . -; • 1 t I i . It �■ .. ..... I 0 f••.7.7•M.• fi -/ i err_ _� i • M•.,�••.tf7 1 7 I M ib I •I I • ! •ift 'r I 1 ..1 r ;V I! •, 1 I Page 8 Febnuazy 28, 1995 ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION MALLARD PARK 4TH ADDITION - EHW PROPERTIES COMPREHENSIVE GUIDE PLAN AMENDMENT, REZONING AND PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION Chairperson Miller opened the next public hearing of th evening regarding a Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment from D- III, Mixed Residential (6-12 units/acre) and RB, Roadside Business to D-I, Single Family (0-3 units/acre) , a Rezoning from R-4, (Multiple) and RB (Roadside Business) to R-1, (Single Family) for approximately 38 acres, a Preliminary Subdivision of 63 single family lots and two outlots on approximately 52 acres, and two Variances to the maximum cul-de-sac length located south of Diffley Road, east of I-35E, on either side of Johnny Cake Ridge Road in the North ; of Section 29 and the NW; of Section 28. The proposed 63 lot subdivision is located on the west side of Johnny Cake Ridge Road and has a net density of 1.9 units/acre. Project Planner Ridley introduced this item. Mr. Ridley highlighted the information presented in the City staff's report, dated January 18, 1995. Mr. Ridley noted the background, the existing conditions and the surrounding uses of the subject property. Mr. Ridley further noted the proposed density, lot size, setback, and landscaping, grading, storm drainage/water quality, utility and access/street design plans. Mr. Ridley not d that the City's 1988 Comprehensive Guide Plan Update expressed the City's goal in addition to providing a diversity of housing was to promote the development of 300 to 500 high-value homes (in exc ss of $150,000. 00) during the 10-year period of 1987-1999. Mr. Ridley advised the Commission that while staff has not yet completed its analysis of the values of the new single-family homes, which consist of approximately 80% of the total new construction since 1990, it is highly probable that the City has met its goal of adding 300 to 500 units priced over $150, 000. 00. Ridley further noted that the rezoning of the subject property to R-1 would result in a single-family development abutting property currently zoned Roadside Business. Ridley advised that staff suggested to the developer a revision to the dev lopment plan to provide a mixture of residential uses that could allow greater spacing between residential structures and the abutting commercial property. Ridley further noted that staff requested the developer to reduce the designated Street B cul-de- sac by 100 feet in order to avoid a necessary variance to the City Code which requires 500-feet maximum cul-de-sac length and to promote an additional 100 feet of natural barrier of undisturbed vegetation between the residential structures and the commercial land to the west. Ridley stated that the developer chose not to make these changes. Page 9 February Z8, 1995 ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION Several repr sentatives of th applicant, EHW Prop rti s, were present: John Willmus, Bob Willmus, Greg Frank, applicant's planner and Dick Marhula, a representative of EHW Properties. Mr. Frank advised the Commission of the background of EHW Properties and its developments within the City of Eagan. Mr. Frank stated that the subject property is the last piece of property owned by EHW Properties. Mr. Frank opined that there is a large mix of residential uses in the area and that high-value homes are needed to be added to the area. Mr. Frank advised that the City Council suggested in 1990 that the applicant rezone the property to R-1, but the applicant refused because the applicant had already provided park dedications based on multiple r sidential zoning. Mr. Frank stated that if the R-1 rezoning is denied, R-4 is the next best alternative and the applicant will move forward with an R-4 proposal. Mr. Frank further advised that the site's amenities, e.g. woodlands, slopes and wetlands, are ideal for single-family homes. Mr. Frank noted that the nearby Wexford Addition development is also a single-family development abutting a roadside business- zoned property. Mr. Frank noted that the subject property, however, differs from the Wexford Addition property in that the subject property has significantly more trees along the abutting property line to the RB property which serve as natural buffers. Mr. Frank further noted that the developer can take advantage of the natural vegetation to meet design needs for single family and necessary transition into the RB zoning. Mr. Frank further not d that the developer intends to put notices in the purchase documents to notify buyers that the adjacent property is zoned RB. Mr. Frank stated that due to the trees, natural vegetation and wetlands, only "two small windows" directly abut the RB property. With respect to the length of the Street B cul-de-sac, Mr. Frank stated that the developer could have proposed to loop Street C with an ingress/egress to Woodgate Lane which would then result in the Street B cul-de-sac to meet the 500-foot maximum. Mr. Frank explained that by looping Street C out to Woodgate, the point of reference for measuring the Street B cul-de-sac would be at the intersection of Street C and Street B. Mr. Frank stated that the developer decided not to loop Street C out to Woodgat Lane because it would result in an adverse effect of losing significant trees and wetland. Mr. Frank stated that the hardship th applicant would suffer if no variance for the maximum cul-de- sac length would be an adverse effect to the trees and wetland. Mr. Frank did not explain how the trees and wetland would be adversely effected without the variance. Mr. Frank further stated that the cul-de-sac need not be shortened because the existing trees at the back of the lots at the end of the cul-de-sac currently serve as a significant barrier to the abutting RB property. C Page 10 February 28, 1995 ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION Mr. Frank further requested the Commission to consider the applicant's request to move the curb cutout on Johnny Cake Ridge Road to the north to provide access for the future developed RB property. Mr. Frank explained that the curb cutout is currently adjacent to the backyard of the proposed lot. In response to Commission members inquiry, Mr. Frank stated that the applicant has no current plans for the adjacent RB property. A resident of 1747 Drake Drive stated that he supports th development. Dan Dolan, the developer of the Wexford Addition development, expressed his disagreement with Mr. Frank's characterization of the Wexford development. Mr. Dolan further stated that the Wexford development has received no cooperation from the applicant in developing the area together. Member Segal inquired with the applicant as to its "vision" for the adjacent RB properties. Mr. Marhula stated that he has no idea how the RB property would be developed, that there are no plans at the present time to develop the RB property and if it wer to be developed, EHW Properties probably would not be th applicant. Mr. Marhula opined that the adjacent RB property would more appropriately be used for business than residential. In response to Member Carlson's inquiry, Mr. Frank stated that ingress/egress to the southern portion of the proposed plat from Woodgate is not viable because the slopes are to steep and the vegetation would be adversely affected. Project Planner Ridley clarified for the Commission that the staff's request that the applicant shorten the cul-de-sac by 100 feet is not accomplished by picking a new point from which to start measuring. Ridley advised that shortening the cul-de-sac would save a great number of significant trees and create a greater buffer between the RB property and the residential structures, in addition, the cul-de-sac would then meet City Code. Ridley further noted that the staff does not suggest looping Street C to Woodgate Lane in the southern portion of the proposed plat. Member Heyl inquired with staff as to how the recent commercial study results affect the subject property and the adjacent RB property. Peggy Reichert advised that there is currently a neighborhood business center on the west side of I- 35E and thus there is a question whether another or more n ighborhood business areas are needed. • Member Isberg expressed concern that a roadside business zon d parcel would be adjacent to a single-family development which in turn serves as a buffer to the use to the south. Isberg stated that he is concerned whether single-family use is proper for the parcel and expressed concern whether future owners of the single-family lots will argue noncompatability when the RB prop rty s eks approval for development. Isberg stated that ? (1( Page 11 February 28, 1995 ADVISORY PLANNING COMbIISSION single family is not compatible with the adjacent RB-zoned property. Member Isberg stated that he agrees with staff that the cul-de-sac should be shortened and that the applicant has made no showing of hardship to justify this variance in the cul-de-sac regulation. Member Heyl stated she does not support the proposal for the following reasons: (1) the subject property, sought to be zon d R-1, abuts property zoned RB which results in a low intense use against a high intense use resulting in noncompatibility; (2) a change in the zoning is not necessary because the area is g nerally a townhome/quad home development area; (3) the 100-foot cul-de-sac variance is not justified because there is a greater n ed to save trees than to allow two extra lots; and (4) the ar a is generally a multiple residential area and there is a potential for the area to use the subject property for multiple residential dev lopment. Mr. Marhula stated that the 1990 rezoning to R-1 was suggested by the City, not requested by the applicant. Mr. Marhula explained that the City Council asked the applicant to do a down zoning to R-1, but the applicant declined because of the mon y the applicant had already paid in park dedication based on R-4 zoning. Mr. Marhula further stated that to shorten the cul- de-sac would require the loss of two lots which "is a lot to a dev loper". Member Segal stated that the proposal to R-1 is a good use, but a problem arises if the adjacent RB property becomes developed. Segal further stated that the problem is not that the subject property is proposed as single family, but that the adjacent property remains a RB-zoned parcel. Segal suggested that a transitional use for the adjacent RB parcel maybe townhome us , not commercial. Isberg expressed concern that there maybe a potential shortage in the future for R-4 development and thus may need this currently R-4 zoned property. Community Director Reichert added that the City staff has not yet formulated information regarding the inventory of property zoned for R-4 development. Segal moved, Wallace seconded, a motion to recommend approval of the Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment from D-III, Mixed Residential (6-12 units/acre) and RB, Roadside Business to D-I, Single Family (0-3 units/acre) . All approved in favor except Members Heyl, Isberg and Miller pposed. Segal moved, Wallace seconded, a motion to recommend approval of the Rezoning from R-4, (Multiple) and RB (Roadside Business) to R-1, (Single Family) for approximately 38 acr-s. Page 12 B4)=728, 1995 ADVISORY PLANNING COM IISSION All approved in favor exc pt Members Heyl, Isberg and Miller opposed. Segal moved, Carlson seconded, a motion to recommend approval of the Preliminary Subdivision on approximately 52 acres, and two Variances to the maximum cul-de-sac length locat d s uth of Diffley Road, east of I-35E, on either side of Johnny Cak Ridge Road in the North ; of Section 29 and the NW; of Section 28. The proposed 63 lot subdivision is located on the west side of Johnny Cake Ridge Road and has a net density of 1.9 units/acre, subject to the following conditions: Standard Conditions 1. The developer shall comply with these standard conditions of plat approval as adopted by Council action on February 2, 1993: AI, B1, B2, B3, 84, Cl, C2, C3, C4, Dl, El, G1, and H1. Preliminary Subdivision 2. The Preliminary Plat shall be revised to insure all lots meet the minimum lot width requirements. 3. Street B shall be revised on the Preliminary Plat to be a maximum 500' long cul-de-sac. 4. A 450' variance to the length of the Street C cul-de-sac is approved. Landscanina 5. The developer shall revise the Planting Plan to provide plantings along the common lot line on the north and increase the number of plantings along the freeway right-of-way. The Plan will require review and approval by staff prior to Final Subdivision approval. Grading/Wetlands • 6. The developer shall submit detailed plans and specifications regarding the construction of the proposed retaining walls. 7. To protect Pond BP-23, an ungraded buffer strip of natural vegetation shall be maintained which extends 15 feet back from the edge of the wetland. 8. The outlet for Pond BP-23 shall be designed to keep the difference in the normal and high water level to 3 feet or less. Page 13 February 28, 1995 ADVISORY PLANNING COMH(IISSION Storm Drainage/Water Ouality 9. On-site detention basins shall conform to City guidelines for size and design and a cash water quality dedication shall be required for any shortfall in on- site treatment required. 10. The developer shall provide a 12 inch outlet to drain BP-23 to the existing storm sewer line in Woodgate Lane. The flow rate of this outlet shall be as identified in the City's Storm Water Management Plan (SMP) . 11. The drainage from the western portion of the site shall be routed to Pond AP-28. Utilities 12. The developer shall provide an 8" stub to the north to serve the Astleford property (PID# 10-02800-010-28) . 13. Lots with access to Woodgate Lane shall be provided individual 4" sanitary sewer service and 1" copper water service. 14. The developer shall abandon any existing wells or septic systems located on this site per Dakota County Requirements. Streets/Right-Of-Way 15. The developer shall remove the existing street opening to Johnny Cake Ridge Road and a new B618 curb and gutter shall be constructed. 16. The street reconstruction project for Woodgate Lane shall be done as a public improvement project, and the appropriate project shall be approved by City Council action prior to final plat approval for Mallard Park 4th Addition. 17. The developer shall dedicate a 75' half right-of-way for Diffley Road along the north edge of outlot B. 18. The developer shall dedicate restricted access on the final plat along Diffley Road across the north edges of Outlots A & B. 19. Corner lots along Woodgate Lane shall take private drive access from proposed Streets A & B. Page 14 February 28, 1995 ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION Park Dedication/Tree Preservation 20. The developer shall pay a cash trails dedication. 21. The developer shall provide 56 Category B trees as mitigation for loss of significant woodlands. 22. The developer shall install fencing at the critical root zone (a distance of one foot away from the tree trunk for every inch in diameter as measured 54" above grade) around all trees depicted on the Tree Preservation Plan to be saved. 23. The developer shall contact the City so an inspection can be performed of the preventive measures installed prior to any site grading, trenching, filling, compaction, or change in soil chemistry taking place. All approved in favor except Members Heyl, Isberg and Miller pposed. Agenda Information Memo May 15, 1995 Eagan City Council Meeting D. FINAL APPROVAL - COMPREHENSIVE GUIDE PLAN AMENDMENT, REZONING & PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION -BLACKHAWK FOREST ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: 1. To approve a Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment from D-111 and LB to D-1 (Single Family) for a 38 acre site located north of Silver Bell Road, east of Highway 13, west of Blackhawk Road, and along either side of Robin Lane. 2. To approve a rezoning from R-3 and NB to R-1 (Single Family) for the same property. 3. To approve a Preliminary Subdivision consisting of 59 lots on 38 acres on the same property with variances to R-1 setback requirements all subject to the 24 conditions recommended by the Advisory Planning Commission. FACTS: • At its meeting of March 7, 1995, the City Council previously considered this Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment and approved it subject to Metropolitan Council review. The City Council also indicated that if the Comprehensive Guide Plan is implemented, the rezoning and Preliminary Subdivision may also proceed. • The Metropolitan Council has reviewed the Plan Amendment and found it has no potential impact upon any of the metropolitan system plan. The City may adopt the Plan Amendment. BACKGROUND/ATTACHMENTS: (4) Letter from Metropolitan Council - pag J APC Minutes - pages c2 I through 4 Rezoning and Preliminary Plat Maps - pages through g . ItMetropolitan Council Working for the Region, Planning for the Future R[EC(EO VED May 3, 1995 MAY 0 8 1995 Mr. Mike Ridley C/O Kristi Marvin City of Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan MN 55122-1897 RE: City of Apple Valley Blackhawk Forest Plan Amendment--Land Use Designation Change Metropolitan Council District 15 Metropolitan Council Referral File No. 157549 Dear Mr. Ridley: The Metropolitan Council staff has reviewed the city of Eagan's plan amendment re. the Blackhawk Forest Land Use Designation change received by the Council on March 9, 1995. The amendment proposes to change the land use designation of 38 acres from Limited Business and D-III Mixed Residential to Single Family. We have determined that the proposed amendment has no potential impact upon any of the metropolitan system plans. Therefore, the city may place the amendment into effect immediately. Because the proposed amendment appears unlikely to affect policies and plans in other chapters of the Metropolitan Development Guide, the Council will waive further review and comment on this amendment. The amendment, explanatory materials supplied and the information submission form will be appended to the city's plan in the Council's files. This concludes the Council's review. Sincerely, Chuck Balle Director CB:ret cc: Kevin Howe, Metropolitan Council District 15 Lynda Voge, Metropolitan Council Staff Richard Thompson, Metropolitan Council S Ruth Ann Sobnosky, MnDOT n----) 230 East Fifth Street St.Paul,Minnesota 55101-1634 (612) 1-t3 Fax 291-6550 TDD/TIY 291-0904 Metro Info fine 229-3780 An Equal E}npbyer Page 12 January 24, 1995 ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION BLACKHAWK FOREST COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT, REZONING AND PRELIMINARY PLAT Chairperson Miller opened the next public hearing of the v ning regarding a Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment form D-III and LB to D-I, Single Family, a Rezoning from R-3 and NB to R-1, Single Family, Variances to R-1 setback requirements, and a Preliminary Subdivision consisting of 59 lots on 38 acres located north of Silver Bell Road, east of Highway 13, west of Blackhawk Road, and along either side of Robin Lane. Project Planner Mike Ridley introduced this item. Mr. Ridley highlighted the information presented in the City staff's planning report dated January 5, 1995. Mr. Ridley noted the background and history of the proposed use and site of the proposed use, the existing conditions of the subject property, the surrounding uses and compatibility therewith, and the proposed site plan. Mr. Ridley concluded that the proposed subdivision is compatible with the existing development in the area though, the compatibility of the proposal with future development in the area is less certain. Mario Cocchiarella, owner of Maplewood Development, Inc. , the owner of the subject property, stated that due to the topography of the subject site it is a difficult site to develop. He stated that the applicant has examined various potential uses for the subject property from residential to limited business. He stated that single-family use is best because of the tree and wetland preservation policies. Mr. Cocchiarella explained that the single-family use of the property is the only use which allows full compliance with the City's tree and wetland policies. Mr. Cocchiarella, stated that the applicant has three issues to address with the APC: (1) a conservation easement is requested for the backyards of the six lots at Blackhawk in order to preserve trees for those six lots and to use as a backdrop for the other lots in the proposed preliminary subdivision; (2) the applicant requests that all tree removal be completed during one stage of the development in order to avoid potential oak wilt infestation and to allow the applicant to hire its own professional tree removal services as opposed to allowing each home builder to remove the trees; and (3) the applicant requests a 10-foot front setback variance for all lots in order to save the maximum amount of trees, noting that the lots along Robin Lan will have a 30-foot front setback. Robert Brown of 4595 Blackhawk stated he supports a single- family development, but he has concerns about the proposed Red Fox Road cul-de-sac along his rear property line. Mr. Brown further inquired as to the potential adverse affects of the storm drainage from the proposed development on his property; the a i Page 13 January 24, 1995 ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION ✓ taining wall along his property on, Red Fox Road; and whether the City intends to provide trails along Robin Lane. A representative of Centex Homes was present and stated that Centex Homes owns the property to the west of the subject pr perty. He stated that Centex Homes' is currently zoned for t wnhome use and Centex intends to build townhomes on its property. He stated that he believes that the proposed dev lopment and Centex Homes intended development will be c mpatible uses, but he wanted to be on record that when Cent x H mes presents its proposal to the City, it does not want to have t provide special requirements to accommodate the proposed single-family development. The representative further noted that Centex Homes may need waivers with respect to the wetland ✓ gulations in order to provide access to its parcel from a 1 cation other than via the subject property. Assistant City Engineer Foertsch responded to Robert Brown's questions. Mr. Foertsch stated that Brown's property will receive water service from Blackhawk and sanitary sewer servic s from Red Fox Road. Mr. Foertsch further advised that Red Fox Road will require a retaining wall behind Brown's property but that th retaining wall will not be within the City right-of-way. The applicant added that Red Fox Road is not directly adjacent to Brown's property and explained that there is a proposed 30-foot right-of-way between Red Fox Road and Brown's property. The applicant further stated that the proposed location of Red Fox Road is the most practical considering the steep contours of the lots and the presence of the wetland. Member Heyl inquired with staff as to how the circumstanc s are different now than in 1990 when the Area K Study was completed which concluded that the area is properly guided and zoned for multi-family development. Mr. Ridley stated that there are no significant changes since 1990 to the area as a whole, although there are some changes in the industrial area. Mr. Ridley stated that the proposal is the driving force behind the proposed comprehensive guide amendment and rezoning. Th applicant, however, stated that since 1990 the City adopted the tree preservation policy and the wetland regulations which is a major change. The applicant explained that no use other than single-family complies with the tree preservation policy and the wetland regulations. In response to Member Heyl's inquiry, Project Plann r Ridl y stated that the City had recently granted two blanket variances for five feet on other subdivisions. Mr. Ridley advis d that it would be more appropriate for the applicant to specify thos lots for which the 10-foot variance is required. Mr. Ridley xplained that the applicant believes the 10-foot variance along Blackhawk is necessary because the topography falls off to the back of the lot and a variance is n eded to avoid that slope. Page 14 January 24, 1995 ADVISORY PLANNING COMNIISSION Member Miller suggested that the City staff and applicant work together to specify the lots for which the variance is requested to be presented to the City Council. In response to Member Wallace's inquiry, The applicant advised that he has not submitted its wetland replacement plan as required by Rich Brasch, but that Mr. Brasch had extended the deadline date to January 30, 1995. Member Isberg suggested that Condition No. 18 be revised to replace the word "avoid" with the word "prohibit. " Mr. Ridley further suggested that an additional condition be added which requires the applicant to prepare the conservation easement for review and approval by the City Attorney and record the easement with the plat at the Dakota County Recorder's office. Member Heyl further suggested that Condition Nos. 18-23 be revised to read as complete sentences. Heyl moved, Isberg seconded, a motion to recommend approval of the Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment from D-III and LB to D-I, Single Family, on 38 acres located north of Silver Bell Road, east of Highway 13, west of Blackhawk Road, and along ither side of Robin Lane. • All approved in favor. Heyl moved, Isberg seconded, a motion to recommend approval of a Rezoning from R-3 and NB to R-1, Single Family, Variances to R-1 setback requirements, and a Preliminary Subdivision consisting of 59 lots on 38 acres located north of Silver Bell R ad, east of Highway 13, west of Blackhawk Road, and along ither side of Robin Lane. All approved in favor. Heyl moved, Isberg seconded, a motion to recommend approval of a and a Preliminary Subdivision consisting of 59 lots on 38 acres located north of Silver Bell Road, east of Highway 13, west of Blackhawk Road, and along either side of Robin Lane, subject to the following conditions: • Standard Conditions I. These standard conditions of plat approval as adopted by Council action on February 2, 1993, shall be complied with: Al,B1,B2,B4, Cl, C2,C3, C4,Dl,El,Fl, GI,and HI. 02) Page 15 January 24, 1995 ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION Subdivision 2. A variance of ten feet to the front yard setback for all lots. 3. Five foot lot width variance for Lots 2, 3, 5, and 6, Block 1, Lot 18, Block 2, and Lots 13 and 14,Block 3. 4. A variance to allow a 9%maximum street grade for Brown Bear Trail. 5. Variances to allow two cul-de-sac streets exceeding the maximum length of 500 feet. 6. All corner lots shall take access from the cul-de-sac street. 7. The developer shall provide detailed retaining wall plans and specifications. 8. The proposed retaining wall cannot be located within any dedicated public right-of- way. Tree Preservation 9. The developer shall install fencing at the critical root zone (a distance of one foot away from the tree mink for every inch in diameter as measured 54" above grade) around all trees depicted on the Tree Preservation Plan to be saved. I0. The developer shall contact the City so an inspection can be performed of the preventive measures installed prior to any site grading,trenching,filling, compaction, or change in soil chemistry taking place. 11. The developer shall provide 176 category A and B trees for tree preservation mitigation. Water Ouality/Wetlands 12. The developer shall provide a 30 foot natural, ungraded buffer strip along the edge of Pond AP-27, and a 15 foot-ungraded, natural buffer from the edge of wetland basins 5 and 6. 13. The wetland mitigation area adjacent to Wetland Basin 3 shall be dropped because it does not appear to meet Wetland Conservation Act criteria for the use of storm water detention basins as wetland replacement. If needed,this mitigation area shall be located adjacent to other basins in the plat that do not receive direct storm water discharge. °C) Page 16 January 24, 1995 ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION 14. Because they will be expanded to satisfy wetland replacement requirements, wetland basins 2, 5, and 6 shall not receive any direct discharge from the storm sewer system. 15. The wetland replacement plan submitted with the plat application is incomplete. A correct and complete replacement plan must be received by staff no later than Wednesday January 25, 1995 in order to allow sufficient time for public review of the application prior to a City Council decision regarding approval of the plat on February 21, 1995. 16. There are several areas adjacent to wetland basins 2, 3, 5, and 10 where grading contours are shown up to the wetland boundary. These are areas where unintended wetland filling could occur in violation of the WCA. The developer shall address specifically how unintended filling of wetland areas due to erosion will be prevented in these locations. 17. The Developer shall provide a 30 foot ungraded,natural buffer shall be maintained from the edge of the NWL of Pond AP-27, and a 15 foot ungraded, natural buffer from the edge of wetland basins 5 and 6. 18. The developer is prohibited from Discharging raw stormwater into Pond AP-27. 19. The Developer shall rout the discharge from Pond AP-27 directly to the storm trunk in Robin Lane instead of to the proposed stonnwater basin in wetland basin 3. 20. After development of the site is completed, the Developer shall eliminate the pre- treatment basin adjacent to the wetland basin 3 stormwater treatment pond. 21. The Developer shall increase the wet pond volume of the stormwater treatment basin associated with wetland basin 3 by excavation as per water resources staff direction. 22. The Developer shall rout raw runoff from Deer Pond Circle and the northeastern segment of Brown Bear Trail to the proposed stormwater basin north of wetland basin 5. 23. The Developer shall eliminate the proposed pre-treatment basin for stormwater runoff from the southerly segment of Brown Bear Trail that is located adjacent to Pond AP-38 shall be eliminated. 24. The Developer shall prepare a Conservation Easement dedicated to the City over Lots 1-6,Block 2, (from 200 feet west of Blackhawk Road, back to Pond AP-27) for review and approval by the City Attorney and shall be recorded with the plat at the Dakota County Recorder's Office. All approved in favor. Community Development Director Peggy A. Reichert noted that the Comprehensive Guide Plan am ndment n eds to be submitted to C; IC Page I7 January 24, 1995 ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION and approved by th Metropolitan Council which may int rfer with the 120-day period during which the City must act on the applicant's application. The applicant agreed to waive the 120- day period. • a • ••.4 III• ". , ,i, ., X 5, •.. .s. . /••• •" I.j, /•11 fr''''' / '1 „ Ili ' / I,/// /e.4,_•-•:,',..2!„ 1 7-•••••:',:.-_•, .' 4 t all 1 ,1611 ....' , . : 0,7. , / .', , xt-'. . .. 1 „ !//,-,„_ -.- ..v.s,„ . .,... • / ',, „, ./ . .,, 1 . •. '1- / ...,-,,, 34 • 1.1...47');4•.'• I r'-..) •. '' -2 de ' , • - 1-• 11 -"xz------- ,r . -,..,,,,,, / -• /a / Ftfilldit,-/-'4----.- ,. ....../ 1/1( . , / I , •. s.. , •'....1 , • , - / • / • ,,';') , i-e--.•-\ ---.. •••• • • I/. •,/ -' , ../ : / ' ; -. 1111,• I `I , t i i ii••,i I.;I ----•/ ' 14' ' / ./ / I , .„ ....- V• 1 / ' / 1,././ ...- ■ • ‘-• ‘....'''bp •-•-• i i 4' '•••• ' / ...L...6. - •••••.- : -111: 1;:.._:-.1'7'., -11—"'7-. 1-\ , I I , .,:i. 71111'1''111:),'" i II l' . 1, ., •• ' „• :% 4/• / • I • • . • I , , I . i \ 's P.‘ .. 4...• ./ /fr• • " . '' "• ' _ ,1/4■P.-•,..Z.'1011.:-.1.1%7Z-4.4 4 f 1 'ss\ I I , 1 I)(n • I • •i•s A' 14:1••, / /7 •••• •• - /•';' /.' •'••• 5•' ' .--- .- -:- - 7"- ' % • .. 1 1 ... . •A, . , ..".:••••-4' '- '.) ' .-/ ' / ; - --I-V'5-"'-'''. 7-1.- 'T--'vv.- -- - /• -I • 1 / '/ 1 1., .,/ ••' : • 11 l' 1?, -• • .l., - l• : • - , • 1.3-....,i. x -.- 4••■,, / 1 •k'/;'1/11 j / V. \ , ,it r ...ow...! • • c ••••,.,-• • - . -.I / / / ' I l' • 4 I IPA / / • ' („r7/ -. 'l 0/' %e • .'-. .,..6./...(-- - • - -•- ---: • • tki.i.v.I.,....,. • •-. - , • ;,-. . ... ., -.-.-... -- .1•:::;........1, ...., ....- --,.. -r. - '''• / •-•,/ .1,---. .•-■•••.,• ' 1■!. , \1 1 . ,/ .,',., ,A „ii_J•rz. , -r---, „ , is'.!..47//1111 I 1 I. \\$k \ i , /1 a a /, /4,,, "ss,,/jc,„..-4- •-••,!.. .,?;',1/2 r 1 ,,,/--,.... i I r N. ,,. ..... / , . • ,, ,,. .f,,,r ,,•,,,.. , ,./.,.. , -, '-r... /I - 1 ILI I ,-,11 I I II - ,• . \ •;•\\ a I, ./,•-')% ' //,'/ •( • • •/„.:-•••Ii- '..1 % II/I0\ • • //‘ '-A `, `,--,,I..?(I. :-.. . ' ' ' it 1 11 1 ( % ,,\:‘f• - /.. /•%../ / ' / . .e.',. elr%,-•— ":1•0. .1. I -/•I' ' • '- •\'-'4• • .1r• \ k% .\ I I %, I I ,•!.,. ''/ iii/ ,' rif• / , 4'i k .., .'■' ' " V „Ili 1 \ I \ \ \\•\.•Ci's 1 1 .' ' '\\ in " I .J- „ , , (lc ,I i ,, "s‘ . _-.., .s., • ,,• , , , •• , ,,„1, • . • \\ ‘... 'IL. ..L. ,.. I . ' ' 1'1.1 • ''::•,1,./1 ',/,•''..... • -' ' /'4:1!„..11‘\\' \‘`\ • ' --'<••••• - ...\\.-” \\\L ; VII.°\ae"..,.:`\\\A ,z■': `,.1 ‘ ."s - - • 7 '•u ,.,i • ,1 I, , 111,.//,/A/4--, 6-/// ,. ..,‘‘,,i1,,‘,% ■.-41,-/- i'.- `s• k`‘' ttb. C'.../Z.\-'1 -1-7.7./"' .101" • •V " • II.' i 0 i , " / /•••• / • . 1 h s 11 A, , \,\ • . • C : :/j1:1° 1''111=;;;-'''''':•' 1e.4.2" :-c-•'`./1.1‘111111‘‘ .\‘'....---. 1./'. 1.‘0;11N1•:‘, \ ;•••••.‘ -..—s4-• '..i, .... . \.%\ % ,1,‘ • - .i. `:t, I . - • :1 •111.... 4 .. l'"' .'4. •Ik‘ ••••, •:•241_\11.1k1 ..,Z,41. eiti, 1-,4\ ` ••°.,1...-.z---z-, .7.4--*•.,, •--,....4,' :„...';•-:zs,,) 1\ \ 11110 . % --,\\ ......... ,..._ iip,,,,7/,/, 3, „lot 1 ii_, 1.......... ::....... _,,1 ,1I % k\ \ '0-, :";-.7.--1-0-.••4-r- ',...:.-)% " 'VA`, i .. 4' Mii Y 1.NM'r ‘ _i• -- -I■V;11‘ \‘y-s•---r-. : ..is• O\k`‘). •\ \ •..-- ..:.:.5.._-1-:----.--;;-_;.--.L.,'-V .k.•., 1,;.v , . t,• , .. ,.,I. -.*. " - :-.4* -."'...--...,l'f ' =' ,?"."-'-',.s 1 k c‘. ‘s . . .r-'11.--5--4ii. . •:-7-fg‘I k•;‘,...-1,g--•:-. ;, ),‘.',._ • . i a,.,,, „, \\\,,\,.. .,• --.,,,,•,-.1,..r.p...,,t, ...„-....„.........-- "...(.1 -'• ---.— s' "S'•-•,,ks , \‘` %Y1/4 , ,• ...... •• • •••,‘"•.••••:',•: / •••••••• k........—-•••\ :;•4:.--i"-.7:'...A.L..•1 •——-3, i'''-•-•'1 ---- ..- i."'• . ;•. ,i/ .,,,,,i....NO •• ..,.t , -_,•••,74 , IN,.,\x,p,, ,, .. '/V>,-, -;,...-1. .,,„.............k.ei•s• \..1,,„-..-.-_..-k.__,= ...„. 7--_ 1 11_,,,..._,-,:• _ i ,/'•11!......V--- 1/4t...3..., ■A, /( . /// 1 r/V ), .... „.ty, 1 1 1\\\2,\,, ,,,-1-;ef,,..!!,.,<- • 1 ■0.1 '4:-, ei,-.,,,,:''' ,. i -Vti, 1 . , . •...: ' ‘.3. • !;"/ ''• ' •," •'• ., ' ,,...4. ,,,. .•■• I •, I x‘55,s.,•'‘. •,--7.1i./..,_,fr..,---." -*k •• 1/4,,/ AlIV(is-•\.\t- ( o I It/ ))/,1W a•,.; I /' \ *--.....e*-,//..- -• ,5- '.,,N ,.., ) I k,1 I „■ *-:.,:r.,,, ,C, uo '.. ••21. )-c\ 0,t\k\\* //'.,'.4-11.- -1/4. ` • ‹ss, ) t /II\ ;\..-,/-..--; 7:-.4-••''•"`° '''- N ) I .v''"...\\\‘.414i , \ • \", ••• , ' f...1 11 V 1.,;■,/r AY t ; l 1.„ s• - - . : 0.1.,__.,,,, ... ., ••(s.,,,■ l% / X%.-.".:-1'..- , . •••••••••,,\•\„X,• \ - ) - • vt.' • n- • '■'''\ s a,•• - ' I ■ • , --\\\` \Vptletg \ , „ \ `, \@•,,Z' I() ‘ , . ."7- ..',,c.).---,zrck-;: .‘■,_.- \ %. ' .),' s, "--N 5 \ ..\■• N ' \\\\‘‘I '>.I • II .1'. . ..00 • , 1 /1 1 •• „j, •,;••=•6• *.::: 't *• \ , .,..41 ;.• - \ - s•-. \ 'Is, 5, \I M vs.n. i . 1 N.. 1. I ...,,, ...,2,y,,,,..-...,-Ii„...;‘\,.:.. .\s -... .2,4 —7' •••\- - --W 2,.• ,-...)sci.:•,,a;a\A.a)i, , --.)•:.,,,' \ fe .,-, A .i. 'fi '//// , • \ , \‘,./.k ,..,0 ‘ k.\ , , , \ °III a , 4//.9/////•0',,,,,.‘ ‘N,\.1/40.7.1/4 \`,,,,<,, •) .\\\ 1 , , 799.,.! ..„ ,1, 111,11 fahilia■ \-) a 4 \ • 0 : • . . - 1,91001, Isr, 1 (- 4 .•. _ I. ..,•• !I , i ,,./4,,..„.„.::„4)..•;‘„, .t„,..!,....1.,\„,„:‘.. ...„.‘ .,,,,,5‘,•,,,\\ 1 ,,,,, 45 / „\ ri, I - % 111111111I elial0 ,( //4• , . /',X,z" ,'/%•./• '••••4,..^- 0\\,X ••■•,\ y k (I\ li I •• , \_,K -N., ‘. /I-4.71th 10411 41 1 X , • - ...,,r.' '..7,A,%2,%.* • ? kl) 14■1 `‘, ` • Ikl f' _,,,,. .„-„,...,., ,,,,„,,,,,-,..,,, , iiIi11111\,.\\,\\'-4,\l''`,■' 110'11;1 -.'•-. t N., - %. r - 'A.P' •;,•'.$ - "I ' Li • '' ' , \% • I t‘ •' s . • '.--•'/' ".../.'99•11117-1)ri ' .1\ \;• \,- '- •----- -- i • I /- , 4 #"4-/-- - ---11-r9-11‘ s.\ • q1\ .: iij JA, a,,,,...ty-,-?.. iTI 1 III 1 i- - .0.y.irr, •••...,- N, \\\*,1 , - :-.--.--- ,-;,..5•,.....:!■417; Lot41,r-,344/14.,1,it'i,,‘ t -,,c,- -7-----1 -- • 1 ; /; , 3,- • .A/0,,„4,/ ( _ ,iii, , ) __,..i I , ..- 7, / /. //// • 1 \rq 1 11 11 1/4"A'' .-{,4,./,./.,./ / I\ I IVO I.8 II ., , ,.://,/ Z..'', , \,,,‘I. ■ .. .".• V.... % . ' ( I .,,I I ''. \ \ \0. •..I. \ I I I Z f r i•, 1, /. . i„,,,•/ •, \ v,‘13 ., • ••:,• , I .ss....1/4 ,,, 1,, ,,,,A,:,,, .‘ \\ -.v \ U. -I "'•;1/..?(A'.• ,/1. 7 I.i' .'•'•"/„17:1;,,/'/,;;',' ,, ,/, I' ,/ ,IS ,...' \\A •'•',A.,Ak. \ • '''‘.\,\ •• •••;' \\....`• N,\\\\4,,,\‘•,\\' ‘‘ , ' '/,/i'./k•'• ”."4/./r;104 1 ;•s-II ';11 •/•// *.i .'2•4' / 1" I '1.-s \•`■ i'''`Tv -••"'■'''''' .‘ '-••■,''\\f.,-. ",''' ,•\,-''','•,`\,\,‘,11I 1,I• '-•-••,.1• \\ ,\, . •i„/./,•/•/•;/./i1,//,'7;11/,,,••-r,'1, • , 22//4///'%'?).'-'14/' ' • ''7 i 1, \‘.'■■ '.\ 1..1‘'0/1 - - '' ''\''s\\V vv•\‘\\Y.'vl\0.4 % :\ '.--.I--.• ‘•*:- / • ' /•%,/ 4./111 l' ' • 1'1" ,,, /I.•••"/..•Y•it '/'''', 21:;•'•!••••• 4. , 11.00, il:I.... \ 5k5Ii . 4 \\,S,\\,\\will\I\IIIIq will ,41 (1)-(4II --, ,, •// 1*/,./.. //,,///4•////,,''i i 1 i //ti,.//' " 4//• ,I II. 1 I I II i k‘k 1 VM„I.I,\.; 11,‘ NI\ s .,'• ,\\\\\\\\\■%11,%\\ ,le I\IL 4 • I i / • .."A•ii"). rill•a/I/1.1• j /r) //11.///////''''''I‘il•••••:•( 1 1 \ • '' I ‘( Nv.c.' •I/If s`• 11„ •‘_'\\ \\ \)$\v‘ v\-1'''‘ k,1.111"1„'' V' I i a - /''.'/.%/1,0.•,',.•.• ,/' a 1 ‘0 ii'l tot iri ii//// ' / ... ,- A , • /„1, 1, //, (I . . ,\ \ I , ` /I ) \‘•', ,i• la ' i A\ . \` . i i I • ss\ i• !Mow // 1 --..; `...•.•-•••••...; •••/ ' 1 1 I ‘ s\ '\\ *ill I VI 1 '. -.A:kb. .`..t••:N., ' // / 1 I 5\ .. \k`j / 'I 5 1 4 \I \\\\\ \\" 0.\00.,, 1 • _ . . •• Ill i,it „ "ilt‘.,\\' •/ / k's •‘,) "--I• \,zt - - ■ -- '- • I ' V-• 1 i1‘v‘ , 803.7k., •, \‘.1■11.1111"/.1'' -",\‘\`‘ %T.•1)141-tv —,.• . \ I "1.\• ••‘°•.-In).-'•%... '' • ••••■:•.••••••• \• ■•• .•:---Z7.---- '.,•• 1. )11\• 1 ,mi -tx •4, nu, ‘ \ ,-•-• •. 1 I I-) 144 11, '•-•;‘\\N ,1 • illq,1 nil' 1,„'Q-".:j. : 1,,'''A' '.• i . ‘• , ..... , % k • I 1 •I, '1) /0'1, .1,14,*1e,•' I'dlii-,-;,D:.. 11/4••• C Z••••:......1••••:,..... •••' •••••"•1•V . -,‘ ' . ' \••••\ I i \ 1 ,1•••„,,,,„a,,, , ‘‘‘,‘ 1 qui ; 1 , • % ,- * ' ':I \.'1\l'i\,111:1%/1‘11:i1}1\11111111:11\111:111‘111:111111111%;‘\"'rilli.‘\1\:‘,\.111111tItIli.'\,,:)\\'i\I;',1.:\,1\'11111‘\:(:"It=.I‘i,1.rs4'1 -':.11- '? / /;• • f•,- - •/,-i 1/-7 1 14./1 =/)..,Y).• . ..' t-:- •- •Y . .. ,--.* ,\ • ,...., , I 1 / A%i%.;/•% ',4 * 1 I III!4,'"K?"." s•IA::::::*•"...-41"1". i lel,' ■I ' ' ,1.:...•N(.:,,I , 1 ' ,•• '',/ ' ;,;(i1:d. ' is.1, '/ 14- ,, y liz:-.. :-. .•9-•-,. :! ro . \s \ /,,ml,',/,• . ' 1 / - Y ,IIV,',. / •kr,:.---•-•-:--:(-: • . •:- \ ki, I (%\ ••.;' 4,ilt,ti i ,/ //,4 :----... .•. -. ,- ... ,........ , ,,C'I,,2/-..,kiii,,,,..,,. ..,-....., 1 . , ,.s.......cA, \\N \ ,•-•- \k / , • ,;?,4". . . • I ', :' k - --,./J///,... \TZ.: --h-... : •:-...•••• `0, ‘ %\\ \ - ) 1,. ,,,1 ...I .„. .... •,.. .. ,; i ----,--,•_-,..5:-........./.....---r A r...--,...,-•'•i-•:S..-• i . , .,-.\ .i..... .L.-___,1 1 t. ,4.-- • - ..,., : ie,,-• ,,,,,7K.‘ , ,.- • %es,.../. //• ofil■ ).:,:.- '' ( I . t ;,./, /.'n.// ' 1---- .''' , ' ' -:::-:•-•':-Z":-.:„.:. ::-.•s'. ‘Nk;<:-.\s, ` . /r\ \ k'. \---, d/r 1 i I , 1 s--. . e• . , . .. : --,r■ \\ \ '''•'. \-a 1 u d' ''' \".2.L. s•'• ‘k.--,cv,I1t4. IAA•I foli,, " II '.1, 1 IC • r i '' , . -,. . . \ ,N\In ,• k\ :•--.-.- 9.44.to i'• --- ■. "•.. ,,:` PY,14 An•.11t• ' t/.1 ,.. •/ , (.' , - - .1,' ..‘-O' 1. I . . 1 ,‘ v ‘ v, ..\...s.,. -......... ,,„...--..::.kk \\\••■• ....I"".; i ..tk 1 -,___ _ _____,_---„, ., ,i,\ 1\\<•)‘•I' ''.' .8; • ---.. '•-:—‘s — ..\\'. . 'i4ifi," ‘ 't• ) ° ---' ' I /,.,,, ,...._:.■r: / • -77••„1., i i •.•,•• I .t..troill..,..\•„.. \ :t ,, ( /,)i III: it(i s 1 •- 0, . ,. .....•-•0/U•., lip% 1,,, I IV,I I 1 Os\'‘,.„.,........ ::."."-:•••:77•=„="....•••■••••••:.•••:::IT•••• ',,A•......,.‘"'A • - // , . Ili/ ;/ ' • , ,„., i i 1,,1.,\v ,.1/4.\,, t••• ap....,....s.....,..., ...... x 4 4 ,,,, rei II -,11 , ; I • , / 6.:-- ,--/ - \. ' I'11 ;1 a"i' , ' 0 -:-.07.--,--,-.---7_--zicri67-1`4 rg.' ••••4 kk k''''' fp II I. I I.,./e/ ."' • ' " • . „' /1 // Pi11111 I I -17 •••--X;47°" -•-• *• I, .I / . 11 II -• 1 1-1\ l 11 - • 1 / 7 I : re-;"'''.== i -'" ‘‘ ,"4,/• \% '6 .., 1 ) '--- •• -. .. 11, / ( ‘ ' - 1 /1 • I • ,017 - . •.........3' ! ., -• ... :-.-(41__-. ---- " - -- ' ‘Tairelliof Pullp• • • 'N‘ • 1. '‘• ••• 1;.:_ 1114 ili I k. ‘ --• .. • • •,. \ i „7". ,•7 .. 1 pr.r-,1------1.----03).- ' "7._.-"q•0,-..:'.:._t.- - i . AI\k, (6 -- .4 - - -.., .. • ." :‘- ' I.6- -- --7 .1 -., f-,; ` -c -- ' I 1 I • til }(4-41 • I H k-7--r-•,-,,-_, _ titll.,-,. 1 .\-„\ ,/ ,,, „ •' ."(•, — - --::---F---.::--:=7.-'' •-: / _-•.• / "1 • //'---..-'."•• ,' ... .1-----, ,_.-....-_, I/Art—y-1 A (/. i 1 /,;. . , 1 1 r -::--• - ,,• , ..,,, 1 .... :. .1 111 s i- -'•" i -- I f•' a ''• 1-Ir1 --. -: X 1,0111111111•1‘11- it /"'</.': •• . \ V 1 t % \ it\• . .u'l•;771r- • • -•-• - s\•\ I% S'. •./il 11,- ' I I ,•1: 4011trim.• II(higlt'.1 /' v it . '' 014 ,I1'.'''''f':' .',•''.. ' ' ilk\\I..'s'-` 'lip I ot•1/9(,C ial •-t..,-,f,k\e‘k\ ‘. ‘, .„ _ 1,, ‘ . . _..,'4.—7-... ,,,,%.„.....- ; ;1 I \ N 1,--.)-•• l'‘)(.\ 1111‘ )30 s-/,,-•2 N7--•---. --`‘‘,\..■`z 1 .1.. i • ..c.-_. 4.31r. r•te ...0„. ..,1. fl•I')Q. " '-•• -—2-...--- j 3''./ 8' i / k • e.... ,k; di / --F r•-•--:rufetriNsiss• 1■` ',•• ) ,1 . II, 11/4 al,.,r.•..•)1•1').r7--'•'' '' -•••:•Fi••=h4aki • Z,Ig ;.-• /I -7 li • -‘.1- :-.C„)ff/fill :14-e/I.• •,j'.'N''k4.‘t---,IA\ :a7.•-..-,: lAil 114:4 'r •• -<•• s KILT 1,4 fa ...-..i., (1! ;....'i•-_-_,..„ ; , i . . 4. .. i . — / ''''' t-k-re ' • • ••_. 1, 2 ..igf' " r.:'-II-- '‘ 4/4-1.1 ' ',.:;-:•.;•, _J•:" -"... ' '. :;)P.'ig /1 ..k.'''' 7 • S\t1' ‘ : °7 7-4: 1- •-1 . • • • • 1•/ ”•%:'- -t "31 ,...-1-01•11t#411) r.--1■•••••• ?', . t\( rTin% ‘,\, ,).7 1;i I',..,, ‘,.1, 1.az :• ......ar, 11(.....1,... .) ...: !,./../0;‘t.,/,. ,-. A 1‘N, \ \‘‘ ffilin_l; . _......,,__ . 1,\\ r -:--,t-44/-', -.I i 'I I I i p I lit 1 , ' I l'11111.44' I •.' O./ , I i km .. ■ '''''., , ,, ._ ..-„,•-••. /.//5/ ..:..,:.4.../ fir', j/1. tkk‘ `1,-"--._ . v s•-•-,\- , 1,5 I' 11/11/11A.,V ':•• '‘ , I ;1/. 4// , \ ,/ ..--: • _ , //k / . , 4. , ‘,, i ,-. .., 7 Li, : I.', •,,,i, tf 1 ',, ,% 1 i, / 1 ag: • •'•-999 -. II/ 1:4 4 - .....,,/ ,1, ..,,.././. • , 5 ..'" 011.1..; •/ 4c..• . , ., La ,_,— --• . •• •,1,1. , ',//.-I _/ ,. •, ‘s\ -_,..7,.r12- I-117-`.\•--... - D•• _j__ _''.'_' -- ' ••• 1 . ' ri...._IT.:.--,,,, • :•,1 / ca . 1 fir ■N•'• 4 - t. '26 ( 1 • f/.,' C- ; - ... _,.. • - 0 4 • 1' ••• il';/O."-• \iP\ .. ' '1 i V'I 1' I. •, I • y. ‘h I/1,1' II j 1\\S..Yd... --:-.•‘- ^• - tfti111. i I '.I V I 1 i• .. "ZVO t%41--;•. il oi --: IL-I, / , .- ' 1 1 ii ,;i4 ...Fir.;.:.11 , ,-) '1■11 .1 . N •C0_14 f■=4 - s'i; t ;1 it P , 1 1 / . 0, 0 r• :I 11411 , ''r -4,• V,' . 14114p' affe , ! . % .1 I ' , r 1 m • l'. ,,,,, _ ,, I .•. . -;;"" . - ;., - .f.s...::., ,. ,I . I• a: 4 ) ••••• ,' 1 ., 4 i4 Jo ••z• , ., ,„'•" . . Al‘ -- -4-a-j i 11.1 I' ... 1 11 l' ., re.i'lL:1:-1..4r 1 n . '•.,(' • . ...ist .••,,s.'• -r=1; _ T • -I.--'-'-1_'/ V `. III •a! .....1 \to.0.1,0 1 vs .1, , GP..,-- 1 ". ,illhi:21.1:1;17 -7 ...Y•t‘u ; i‘ ' -15511rV ilv 1 '' '''' .' '' 1 ' 1 t•,, ■f s-.... I I, ,,/ -.., id( ..)„, ,, at 1.! .. - - .,..‘ ) •,.1 , (1 ,-..- _-,...-: -.' , _ ,I, ., .. -,:-.7.7 ■ (-- -r .._ .10i --Ikt-r ,.-Id- .. .i•-•-••■-•,— - -• ..,- .-- -- '—'--.-- :- .1.-..--,:4;t4.,-- -- - -- '`'I) •-•"\-:- • -1 0---.1_ — .--- - ••I I VIII I I I I atora N C. \. V % r- f. '\. O \ f .. \\,■\ .%t)j..% '- .: A . \' J`4- - a1...- r ::■ « fir 1' /, Rw { i I U.% 1, lit ` •:11, s a . r f .2g L.i 1 • i i. f .• •t• •. • I Ill I = R ` ---r. \\\ n� .. \\ f • • `\ r J c w-- .� \ „. t \ I 7 jj' jjq,f• i I/ lir \ - \\ \ /I II • �� �— •} >� ..�r i $ _ ; f t 4 \\•%e . 011 I I I ra,,,I; 4r • / � \. ti:: os / L . '* a lit Agenda Information Memo May 15, 1995 Eagan City Council Meeting E. FINAL SUBDIVISION - CEDAR HEIGHTS ADDITION ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: To approve the Final Subdivision for Cedar Heights Addition located on the east side of Slater Road, south of Storland Road, and abutting the west side of I-35E. FACTS: • The final plans, development contracts, and escrow agreements have been reviewed and are in order. Approval of this subdivision is, therefore, appropriate. • A small piece of this original property was severed by the construction of I-35E. It is now being replatted as part of Lot 20, Block 1, Safari Estates 2nd Addition in a new Final Plat called the "Justin Dean Frank Addition". This is a separate item on the Consent Agenda for City Council consideration on May 15, 1995. BACKGROUND/ATTACHMENTS: (1 Final Plat Map, page 30. 1........ i I 1 O/. I O ° f ii 31 1 • i ;qt ,` !:_ 1 I • u I c .,'• •`Q II I 3 •'t, i it. f .. +-%, v s i titi t1„•111 i s c i •1 t ,, I�l c t`.a r ., Ili; 44 a ♦.. P 1_ FS £ i o 41 11 i A � •" A I it I. ,112.1 A=l= ::! gift r« ;!%`;L;�:'' y, i:r g i ) Z u e a •_i,, .� not •w. . ..' yti 'Is"* v,: al*` S I 111: ��y q': i q "R`• //AP R:4 tit^ ',i .•r \; .` .' `•I ,4• . -,r--�` qt ' rat e • +' ~w+•4 r..i. ii /(i) • r =.`:+`14.- ` / C;/ ,`` `s*, ,i N It ',. 1. A. `•t M`; �,`� Lj C' O +••T`4 'i l X i " 1's''... it / .ii„,,,,,,::. .� •;�4•t q )'-- : ..� -? is * . c , Q ''+, -. "Vila a r- Lys.• Ci M hi __55 i,.--..--t.,,,• *...; ,i /4 re i,i r• IA 13i i" Yl A h ?i 1 1 : ii1.4_� 1,# 311 4� ,�� `�='- L- -;1 1 t4 ..1 ‘ r-, , or. , _ a, 1 t •----- I r/ f • 1 1R I la it Mt ' 1 it . 1 11 / r •T, yr 1 , � . i/• ,d i e I •1 • b • NM ww 'i \ ' 1 t / OI ,emu ' R I —t- Of i k wy, r-iiri- t...A-gets= +:;. O N I _ .r..J §. 1. 4Q 1 x , - r ''t'sl�___T_ aJ i • S- 'R■ 1'40`-4! -7.ti' �'S i T a.•sr. ipt{• 1 a ;' j N R q �i.' i 1q L Ig `�.' ' % Iv / ; b! 1l- i 7'— �i!l 9-y' , It n i � '.'�`'"•`t\�- S f `1' { c: R+�� i ;6v :o�oe. arm" y �Ja•w. NOUd39X3 ! --47.1%.1".4 , v 1 l �M 10X..2.0.... L►rKOp/ . __ -__ /� Nptld39X3 •••�rv, �• '•�rc.' i.,aw+I• ....... ■ , l 1' :t K j i it ,rri � d U lL..I 1: l I A � / nni.0 I C; f:: .�C ` f� .. 11 4 : .n11 Agenda Information Memo May 15, 1995 Eagan City Council Meeting F. AMEND 1995 FEE SCHEDULE-BUILDING PERMIT AND PLAN CHECK FEES ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: To approve the new building permit and plan review fee schedule consistent with the 1994 Uniform Building Code. FACTS: • On April 4, 1995, the City Council adopted by ordinance the new 1994 Uniform Building Code. Upon adoption, the City's fee schedule should be changed to reflect an increase to the 1994 fees as required by the Uniform Building Code. • Analysis by the Chief Building Official indicates that the new fees for Eagan will be compatible with those of other northern Dakota County communities. • The plan review fee will be increased over a three-year period to the ultimate 65% plan review fee in 1997. BACKGROUND/ATTACHMENTS: Memo from Chief Building Official, Doug Reid - pages 342--through 3'. 401111° MEMO _ city of eagan TO: PEGGY A. REICHERT, DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT FROM: DOUG REID, CHIEF BUILDING OFFICIAL DATE: MAY 3, 1995 SUBJECT: FEE SCHEDULE CHANGE At its April 4, 1995 meeting, the City Council made an ordinance amendment to Chapter 4, Section 4.01 D. Chapter 1305, to adopt the 1994 Uniform Building Code. Upon adoption, the City's fee schedule should be changed to reflect an increase to the 1994 fees. Our current fees have been in effect since 1988 and as you can see, fees have substantially increased since then. Attached is a comparison outline of 1988 and 1994 fees based on valuations of$150,000, $175,000, $500,001, and $1,000,001. For your information, I am also attaching a copy of Table 3-A, Building Permit Fees, shown in the 1994 Uniform Building Code. Inquiries into five surrounding communities regarding fees revealed the following: APPROVED/ UTILIZING UTILIZING ADOPTED 1994 UBC 1988 UBC 1994 UBC FEES FEES Apple Valley 1 ,r --- Burnsville --- Inver Grove Heights Lakeville Rosemount As mentioned previously, Inver Grove Heights, Lakeville, and Rosemount chose to adopt the 1994 code, but continue to use the fees outlined in the 1988 UBC to remain competitive with surrounding communities. These same cities charge considerably higher SAC and WAC fees than Apple Valley, Burnsville, and Eagan. Rosemount assesses a storm sewer charge of $1,071.00 which puts their fees substantially higher than neighboring cities. As indicated in the attached "Fees Collected on Building Permits" chart, Lakeville collects $2,000 upfront for tree escrow and lawn installation fees. These fees are refunded to the contractor upon completion of this work. The State Building Code allows cities to amend the fee schedule, 1305.0107, Section 107, Plan Review, as follows: "The plan review fee for dwellings, apartment houses and their accessory structures, may be established by the local authority and must not exceed 65% of the building permit fee." I am, therefore, recommending the following: ► adoption of the 1994 fee schedule. ► A 35% plan review for 1995; 50% in 1996; and 65% in 1997 for dwellings, apartment houses and their accessory structures. ► A 65% plan review fee for all commercial/industrial/institutional/public facilities, etc. permits for 1995 and future. A new code change, including a revised fee schedule, is proposed for the year 1998. If you need more information on this item, please feel free to contact me. Chief Buil g Official DRfjs attach. • fee-sche.peg 53 FEES COLLECTED ON BUILDING PERMIT INVER APPLE GROVE VALLEY BURNSVILLE EAGAN HEIGHTS LAKEVILLE ROSEMOUNT SAC CITY 250.00 197.00 100.00 205.00 747.00 1,125.00 MWCC 850.00 850.00 850.00 850.00 850.00 850.00 WAC 460.00 787.00 750.00 1,255.00 2,163.00 1,125.00 ROAD UNIT 400.00 425.00 FORESTRY 60.00 WATER METER 118.00 44.15 115.00 132.46 95.00 PRESSURE REDUCING VALVE 56.49 36.50 S/W PERMIT 30.00 60.00 100.00 S/W SURCHARGE .50 .50 $0.50 ACCOUNT DEPOSIT $30.00 PARKS DEDICATION 850.00 TREATMENT PLANT 372.00 350.00 STORM SEWER 1,071.00 OTHER 1,000.00* OTHER 500.00 1,000.00* (Tree Bond) BASE FEE 1,137.25 1,137.25 1,137.25 814.50 814.50 814.50 STATE SURCHARGE 75.00 75.00 75.00 75.00 75.00 75.00 65% PLAN REVIEW FEE 739.18 739.18 398.04 529.43 529.43 529.43 TOTAL BUILDING PERMIT FEES $4,176.42 4,426.58 $4,352.79 5,061.39 $7,273.93 $5,589.93 COLLECTED ON A $150,000 HOME Will use Will use 1994 Will use Will Will Will 1994 UBC UBC fees & 65% 1994 UBC continue to continue continue fees & plan review. fees and use '88 UBC to use '88 to use 65% plan plan review fees & 65% UBC fees & '88 UBC review. as follows: plan review 65% plan fees & 1995 - 35% review 65X plan 1996 - 50% review 1997 - 65% Lakeville: A tree escrow preservation and landscape escrow of $2,000 are collected and refunded when complied with. * Fees collected and refunded upon completion. Inver Grove Heights: B-line sewer charge of $547.00 applies in some instances. Apple Valley & Burnsville: PRV - fee collected only if a•pressure reducing valve needs to be installed. 3 4 (01.11111° City of Community Development Department Eagan, Minnesota Building and Inspections Division 1988 VALUATIONS $150,000 $175,000 $500,001 $1,000,001 Base Fee $ 814.00 $ 902.00 $2,040.00 $3,540.00 Plan Review 529.00 586.00 1,326.00 2,301.00 TOTAL: $1,344.00 $1,488.00 $3,365.00 $5,840.00 1994 VALUATIONS $150,000 $175,000 $500,001 $1,900,001 Base Fee 1,137.25 1,262.25 2,887.25 5,012.25 Plan Review @ 35% of Base Fee 398.04 441.79 1,010.54 1,754.29 Plan Review @ 50% of Base Fee 568.63 631.13 1,443.63 2,506.13 Plan Review @ 65% of Base Fee 739.21 820.46 1,876.71 3,257.96 INCREASE 8L TOTALS VALUATIONS 1 cr. $150,000 $175,000 $500,001 $1,000,001 Base 8t 35% Plan Review: 15% 1,535.29 1,704.04 3,897.79 6,766.54 Base 81 50% Plan Review 28% 1,705.88 1,893.38 4,330.88 7,518.38 Base 8t 65% Plan Review 41% 1,876.46 2,082.25 4,763.99 8,270.21 DOLLAR INCREASE VALUATIONS Dollar increase would be: $150,000 $175,000 $500,001 $1,000,001 Base 81 35% Plan Review 191.29 216.04 532.79 926.54 Base 8t 50% Plan Review 361.88 405.38 965.88 1,678.38 Base 81 65% Plan Review 532..46 594.25 1,398.99 2,430.21 3830 Pil t Kn b Road, Eagan MN 55122 o (6 - • •^r '•75 c FAX: 681-4612 c TDD: 454-8535 TABLE.3•A—BUILDING PERMIT FEES T TAL VALUATION I FEE 31.00 to $500.00 52!_.00 r- 5501.00 to 52.000.00 S2! .00 for the first 3500.00 plus 52.75 for each additional 5100.00 or fraction thereof, to and including 52.000.00. 52.001.00 to S25.000.00 S62.25 for the first 52.000.00 plus 512.50 for each additional S1.000.00 or fraction thereof, to and including 525400.00. • 525.001.00 to 550.000.00 5349,75 for the first 525.000.00 plus 59.00 for each additional 51.000.00 or fraction thereof. to and including 550.000.00. • $50,001.00 to 5100400.00 5574.75 for the first 550.000.00 I plus 56.25 for each additional 51.000.00 or fraction thereof, to and including £100.000.00. 5100.001.00 to S500.000.00 . SRR7.25 for the first 5I00.000.00 plus 55.00 for each additional 51.000.00 or fraction thereof. 5500.001.00 to 31.000.000.00 S2.R87.25 for the first 5500.000.00 plus 54.25 for each additional 51,000.00 or fraction thereof. • to and including S L000_000.00. 51.000.001.00 and up 55.012.25 for the first 51.000.000.00 plus 52.75 for each additional 51,000.00 or fraction thereof, Other Inspections and Fees: 1. Inspections outside of normal business hours S42.00 per hour* (minimum charge—two hours) . 2. Reinspection fees assessed under provisions of Section 305.8 542.00 per hour* • 3. Inspections for which no fee is specifically indicated s 542.00 per hour* • (minimum charge—one-half hour) 4. Additional plan review required by changes, additions or revisions to plans 542.00 per hour* (minimum charge—one-half hour) 5. For use of outside consultants for plan checking and inspections, or both Actual costs** *Or the total hourly cost to the jurisdiction, whi • ver is the greatest. This cost shall include supervision, overhead, e• ••ment, •ourly wages and fringe benefits of the employees involved. . a **Actual costs include administrative d ov a:• - • costs. • Agenda Information Memo May 15, 1995 Eagan City Council Meeting G. FINAL PLAT - JUSTIN DEAL FRANK ADDITION ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: To approve the Final Plat for the Justin Dean Frank Addition located at 2050 Safari Heights Trail on Lot 20, Block 1, Safari Estates 2nd Addition. FACTS: • This plat involves an existing lot in the Safari Estates 2nd Addition that is adding additional property adjacent to I-35E that was severed from the Cedar Heights subdivision during the construction of the 1-35E freeway. This small sliver of severed property is now being acquired and incorporated into an existing lot. • There are no final development plans, contracts, or escrow agreements ass ociated with this plat. BACKGROUND/ATTACHMENTS: (1) Final Plat Map - page . 3? Agenda Information Memo May 15, 1995 H. CONTRACT 95-03. APPROVE PLANS/AUTHORIZE ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS JTH 3 & RED PINE LANE- ST. SIGNALS & UTILITIES) ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: Approve the plans and specifications for Contract 95-03 (TH 3 &Red Pine Lane- Street, Signals, & Utilities) and authorize the advertisement for a bid opening to be held at 10:30 a.m., on Friday, June 16, 1995. FACTS: • On 7-19-94,Project 673 (Red Pine Lane-Streets&Utilities)was approved as a result of a public hearing and the Council authorized the preparation of detailed plans and specifications. • These plans and specs have now been completed and are being presented to the Council for their consideration of scheduling a formal solicitation of competitive bids with a bid date scheduled for 10:30 a.m., June 16, 1995. • All interagency agreements with MnDOT and CPR Rail have been executed. All necessary easements and rights-of-way are being acquired through the eminent domain proceedings with some early rights-of-entry already being obtained. Latest date of possession is July 15. ATTACHMENTS: (1) • General location map enclosed on page t4(D T _..._..._..._...__._... CLIFF ROAD (C_S.A.H. 32)1 I. . 0111 : E"►/ 4, II : RU I ` ��n CONTRACT LS= _\ elemmi,p i■ ow a .,x4 4r `ii, - .441 111 I tilt PROPOSED T. — '1�.,f Q� �p %tad I. IMPROVEMENTS lti .0600 I—...—...—...—...-'-."—".—lirt 1 it r I /." 111111610 —-C go iv!" _ 404; ! i � __ __R- : . : ,a ,.� i PROPOSED WESTON SCH OL RlAD 1.1( NEW ' HILLS DRIVE ELEME TARP , ,;I SCHO•L itN I L..._ ._ ►' .. ..._..._ .._..i H -----.._...1..._..._..._...� PROJECT LOCATION CONTRACT I : : ti I ti.• . 0 500 ,000 diSinMaail 50016 ti f..► LOCATION PLAN II Bonestroo • Rosene EAGAN, MINNESOTA FIGURE 1 Iry Anderlik & T.H. 3/SCHOOL ROAD Associates CITY PROJECT No. 673—Revised 40 49553F02.DWG MAY 1994 COMM. 49553 Agenda Information Memo May 15, 1995 L CONTRACT 95-05.APPROVE PLANS/AUTHORIZE ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS (WESCOTT SO & BLACKHAWK HILLS ADDN - ST REHABILITATION) ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the plans and specifications for Contract 95-05 (Blackhawk Mills Addition& Wescott Square-Street Rehabilitation)and authorize the advertisement for a bid opening to be held at 10:30 a.m. on Friday,June 16, 1995. PROJECT NO. 664,WESCOTT SQUARE FACTS: • On 4-18-95, as a result of the public hearing,Wescott Square and Ivy Lane were approved for reconstruction and rehabilitation and Council authorized the preparation of detailed plans and specifications. • These plans and specifications have now been completed and are being presented to the City Council for their consideration of authorizing a formal solicitation of competitive bids at a bid opening scheduled for 10:30 a.m., Friday, June 16, 1995. ISSUES: • At the public hearing, Council directed staff to revise the preliminary assessment roll to allocate costs only to those parcels that take either direct driveway or private street access to the public streets being reconstructed. This assessment roll will be revised in conjunction with the preparation of the final assessment roll which should have no bearing on the preparation of the detailed plans or contract award. PROJECT NO. 645, BLACKHAWK HILLS STREET REHABILITATION FACTS: • As a result of the public hearing for Project No. 645, held on 4-18-95, the Council approved the project and authorized the preparation of detailed plans and specifications. • These plans have now been completed and are being presented to the Council for their consideration of authorizing the solicitation of competitive bids for a bid opening to be held at 10:30 a.m., on Friday, June 16, 1995. • On 5-4-95,an informational neighborhood meeting was held with interested property owners to review the proposed detailed plans. A summary memo of that meeting is attached. • The City Attorney's Office will be coordinating the appraisal of 3-4 properties to determine the maximum benefit associated with this improvement. \*"..ka Agenda Information Memo May 15, 1995 Item L (Continued) • With the project being bid with two alternatives(total reconstruction compared to rehabilitating Birch Pond Place with a mill and overlay), an economic analysis will be performed and presented to the Council for their consideration in awarding the contract. • The scope of the project has been reduced to eliminate that portion of Birch Pond Road closest to Ashbury Drive constructed with the Blackhawk Glen Addition and eliminating the bubble on the Blackhawk Point cul-de-sac. ISSUES: • At the public hearing, several residents expressed concern regarding the necessity to reconstruct/rehabilitate portions of the streets in question. Subsequently, the Council directed staff to delineate more specifically with the detailed plans and specifications those portions of the street that could be salvaged and rehabilitated with a mill and overlay rather than full reconstruction. ATTACHMENTS: (1) ( I • Summary of neighborhood meeting enclosed on pages X1.3 through 4S. • General location maps enclosed on pages '4Up throughL 7 . qa- lijili..,1n.y A5nrno.Apt v4t.wN Ana i..l1,I. 8,.I:VIM.1,14.AdI.II'I.p.d+room uylilyr.gn., Bonestroo yglu/lliwr'•gIroJ1. ,,.....A."4„„pi Ilk 110Clyfwn,1.1. WI., .li.1g1.PI Rosene ii.l 71 W 1:.1.1,.•.111 • M'itA 1p.hl•.4.11 Iii.•.If lit14rd,1.1• KI•ii1111 Yg%.'1. I..V.I A.140111.rh w,Arlr It Igoll1...'.M. 1,•1ry II h,Ie Ul►PI•. 11.1u1►n I.11 01.14.PP, • M Alm v,l I.•14.1611.4 Ii 411116..1 W 11.N1,,I9, 11.1111 l AnNn11M.in, YIWWI.II(a Maluuy I:1•. vi Anderllk& K,iimI I. hru,.@I 141v.1(1111r111.41K. isven411 r M.I!Iv Phil' (.III at.111Y116 ri '.i,.1III11"..it •du,II.Iu,.r1,AlA. KYkP Pout.nl:. Pawn.Ina,.l'I. Associates h.'I'h.,I.N,g1•.,PI. h,ly A.IMMrd.w►rk. 6trl,A.Sr.,,l yY. IAA l'tiYd14.1:1. Hru,lllS.11.•IC,Nh MrYAlhvin.tl71. 1..yWM1■IhylI Udn U.tbreUtil IW. i ..m.1.114.Iw•rllt 1 1.A W.I....,14111w1►I,, I'I•. Prd 14.riw1 ALA 11:flny h lllwri.p,,11. Engineers&Architects •4,w.1..Lido... 1,,,‘i IY0.11, 14.11.1 I.EtIquilon.II. h.iE$.I.I;t.n,.PI- rlwwu.rf If AIYIr,us.ALA. A IiN7 W WMII.P1. Luc M At m.P1 I Ia111111',IU.J.w.II,Al. 1•I1I11 I(.1.W4L II:. Mow'A I'I Y►r vs IIw.Iy.1.A.%yfu4 VI' Moll I)WAIL,111: 11,,M v.lwllA►y 1 u,I•n' I.ilydwnli,PI 1AI6..IL!own In 14.rmil M(IImn wort WWI IV.PI I.I'I.yly(i . 1•m A.pe.M uMq *thaw I'k•1.Ii. pnnl M..mv,lU• 1.1u•.I1up•14.d1 111111.1.1%W I11'1•1.Mi I'I 11.y 11.!Amu!'u.III. I To: Mike Foertsch,Assistant City Engineer MEMORANDUM From: Mark Hanson,BRA Subject Informational Meeting(May 4, 1995)for Plan Review Blackhawk Hills Street Reconstruction Project No.645,BRA File 49536 Date: May 11, 1995 An informational meeting to review the preliminary plan for the above project was held on May 4, 1995. The purpose of the meeting was to review the plan and answer/resolve questions raised at the public hearing(April 18, 1995). A list of residents In attendance is attached. Street . reconstruction,storm sewer,and sanitary sewer/water main repairs were discussed, Photos of existing roadways were presented showing each roads condition. Specific issues discussed: • The condition of Birch Pond Road and Birch Pond Place. North 300'of Birch Pond Road constructed in 1986 balance constructed in 1977. Residents agreed,based on photos portions of existing roadway needs to be reconstructed. However,some residents stated if project is being constructed prematurely the City should finance more than 2S%of the cost,After much discussion,residents agreed to leave both roadways in project. Since meeting City Staff is recommending north 300'of Birch Pond Road be excluded from project and be considered with Ashbury Road in the future when it's reconstructed, Lot 1 Block I Blackhawk Hills 2nd Addition will be-excluded from the reject. • The redesign of the 90°curve at Blackhawk Hills Road and Blackhawk Cove. Layouts including center island were presented. After much discussion,all residents agreed to a slightly smoother curve with no modifications made to street width(no center island). Additional storm sewer catch basins will be constructed to eliminate storm water draining across street. • Storm water drainage in general was discussed at each of the 3 low points where deterioration of the street is much greater. It was stated geotextlle fabric,drain tile,and • Improved crown in street will be included to prevent deterioration, ■ 2335 West Highway 36 • St. Paul, MN 55113 • 612-636.4600 a0'd 'OSSV 2 OOd1S3V08 (.....(3 TT£T 8£9 ZT9 SO:9T S66T-TT-S0 • Mike Foerrtscch,Assistant City EngJneer Page 2 May I I, 1995 • Pedestrian traffic was discussed which included stripping of roadway to define pedestrian walkways and possible sidewalk construction. Consensus from residents is not to construct sidewalks;however,stripping of the roadway was asked to be investigated further. Staff has further reviewed stripping following meeting and feels stripping is not warranted and may promote a false sense of security. • Water main construction in Blackhawk Cove west of Birch Pond Road(320 L.F.)and at the connection of Blackhawk Cove and Blackhawk Hills Road was reviewed with residents. Water main construction in Blackhawk Cove(320 L.P.)was not included in the preliminary report and was requested to be added by public works after report was done. • Street reconstruction procedures were reviewed which included bituminous reclamation, new aggregate base,and patch/mill/overlay. Consensus of residents is to construct project right. If bituminous reclamation can be constructed In areas where patch/mill/overlay La justified for not much more cost,It's preferred to construct a bituminous reclamation type project to retard reflective cracking. Following meeting,staff requested plans be prepared to bid bituminous reclamation as base bid and new aggregate base as alternate. Patch/mill/overlay will also be bid as alternate to compare cost to bituminous reclamation . and new aggregate base. • Residents expressed concern with increase traffic if new bridge is constructed over I-35E from Duckwood Drive to Federal Drive. It was stated design would direct traffic to Yankee Doodle Road not to Blackhawk Hills area. It was also stared cost is high and project is in preliminary stages, Hearings have not been scheduled. • The engineer's estimate for concrete curb and water main repair are estimated to be higher than estimated in the preliminary report because additional construction has been added during plan preparation,as listed below: Preliminary Report Engineer's Estimate Concrete Curb $23,465 $35,385 Water Main 5,050 39,500 The engineer's estimate for street reconstruction has not changed from preliminary report. Therefore,the estimated assessment to residential property has not changed. The estimated cost for the City is approximately$46,000 higher than estimated in the preliminary report as shown above. MAR lk ■ £0'd 'OSSV 4 00U1S3V09 TT£T 8£9 ZT9 S7:9T MGT-TT-SO EA' MAINT. FA[. TEL:612-681-4360 May 10 95 15:10 No.013 P.02 . H BLACKHAWK HILLS INFORMATIONAL MEETINO MAY 4,1901 PROJECT#845 8:30 P.M. NAME ADDRESS__ 1 C \r`'S 14°W41414ck 4;4 - , IPANNOMA` 141 kiS t24,.. 2. .! .°!! ..t4t4Sekciel . 142'e eiLl,ctcNoiui 3. W. ce, Ntr- � .. .. ' . 4.UM,% ',. ... . . .. . 'F r. .R.),-4/1/314. .r1.a, 5 044r r /IN. .a . .S. .. .. &ilrclrlt ( qua 6 h‘k 1AP #J l ta , 6.rcfdc '.11.1•.(14. 7 /?14/4 ^!.�' 4!� ... .. .. . . .. 4144 8. . tosar ..brks 3L).:... . . Gi a. . . �.ck./2 �d (.,�A ..aI"rhesn4' f 10. .G r, .. .C)lcr /G!?. 7actclaQ.wl�.. /?/ 11 12, 13 14 16 10 b0'd 'OSSd OOW.S3408 f TT£S 9£9 ET9 9b:9T S66T-TT-SO • : —7:: z=1..---7-__;... i -.. : _-__..., ,r----177.--{ficu..c\, : ,......„. i.... .... t. 1..,.... i ..;.., 1 • :. 1 4 : ■: I - •* •;"• `1••••••■ ••■•••• 1.....‘ I \i i .., 4_4.1 rt9;--•:----.., ' --•--------:-.-... . / \-(e-,.. '...4.? _>--* -, "zs ;::- � � _ �• it: / i...." .. . - - q : I LI---- --,=-11-1`----r--, .--. c.14, &*\\,(el= '. 1-':-- t'''• / ' ! ' q( 3 Keay AIR ; ��jr^\ 1 ,/ ; }w ,. �`•,```+�. (��r `r e.: !' . i^.ti91!16NCiM[,,, r^(' �e ` \ // /� ; ....„::::1iIIt `4.`t...}` ' r.‘: rN,.5. •Ni/ l...4_,....,-.... v N\\ /r\ — _),,g; .-, _ -1— _ .. : r---.! . —7, y , .. , mri I II RUM, \ \\,e 1 \A._ . _ u.v.,. ..4 ii 1. -;,. . Iiis , • ___,, , ,,,, , . N. ._ _ _75%.7: ..,.... .. ____ . H-1 - kr, • lais . •/ ,,,--, : . . ;-'" ' I . i i :57,1-4_,, , 1---L,I.Y L fi': , -=--1-7N \ ' ///' /. ._ . pm I I i I ekstsAAL I ez";# , 007 ., ,„/ . -I....i7.4.74..,,Ai•1 ,‘‘.:.:,..,..aigg.;-1 747 ca.-1._i / .,.- .ft t 4,64.;444_ -.t...a : lel' . • py / f- • . • • .. � �n�— //7 V"... ,I.. - --li'-----AR- /47 :io / 1171.11' gE __.411 _! .: , �, �—� Pry , ! r-_ $! 1 / 1 , III I ' = I' L/ _ro�,ett _Location __,--,1 = 1; � _.-.,;; Wes�a tt Hill L:r' 1'� ' awe.aDOGG[AO ;i , 1 r rASnla OOQDCC A0/D —'' rI i I ,2i• ;e i, T t._,,,... . : ` 1�.i �... , �r� • \ t _, _.] , ,.....„...„.......- . .,‘„,7.,,..0 , 1---1 ..x. . e,t, ..j I—Li±:111 'rte :...1 17,—in-lw----7.7 .aomi...3--,v...0.- , . .:1�, ,�y1�' r� �, / ` l ,.„' 71 P� „,,,,-,44-,C . . .0•' .1:I• 1 7 IALL=Etle L'D 1-7-4( ' . '' I !.i.r7 :... ."f4°7 N.j .3 /7\10P .%a- "..." . .: :win I . ..,,,:e ,, . .,,. .....„,„„ ... ,e.,,,.. , ,„,., • _ • • 1000 x SZEMS km. .I 1..I LOCATION PLAN fil Bonestroo • Aoeen EAGAN, MINNESOTA FIGURE 1 ` And rli t s STRE31 = I : CONSTRUCTION �V� Cl PROJECT No. 66 • 49554R0 .s” 1-- .95 COMM. 49554 mac' • /TT ,` T / i _ YdAY�EE 0000ff �Fi^{'�--I-- r1 i �l r > 4/ I�� �'ATI O N T -; I�(./ ,:.; -, -- .,---- ,I , .4. (\,/ \N.,/ ....A.-____--.--, G fit,. I . -1.1.! �f 1 1 ... i.._. , '...ro`c-1,8r,-_,tt::‘ _1 I-ti• 7.7K% -.l' \,r—r,, 1 IT..m .. ' • 1 1 X1!,4, I I ^d.. /, �' IL t L� �°...I �i1. � {, Cy c'• ��,//��p i `, t n_ -r. .. I 41›.4'•s .3 • rte,A .. ':'/.. %7T11-- ; fi,..t,. , ,..._/, ,, , 74... It__ ., 1,_ ____,_711)1Crti ‘r,-lij \-1 li-i I Fr; / : pl--. 's.;,52.• i.-f • . --)e- . . 7.)--)r- I ,,---,,:11 k\ti.. .ii 1 ,,,,,,,igoo_ I , O m Nt'_ " •-0 i . sr:V egg...' J I�� •iii -tzt ./ '�` 5`' �� g � IV I LI toner A010 � 1 INIY OOA0 JO . — y_— .... -- S' •J I —— N 0 1000 2000 • su,. inNat J LOCATION PLAN Bonestroo Rosene• • • Ion EAGAN, MINNESOTA FIGURE 1 Anderllk 3 Associates BLACK TREET RECONSTRUCTION CI ROJ. No. 645 L:\49\49535\49536FQ1 APRIL 1995 COMM. 49536 iLk,1 Agenda Information Memo May 15, 1995 J. CONTRACT 94-18.APPROVE FINAL PAYMENT (1995 SEALCOAT AGGREGATE MATERIAL) ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: Approve the 1st and final payment for Contract 94-18 (1995 Sealcoat Aggregate Material) in the amount of$43,194.83 to Meridian Aggregates. FACTS: • On I1-15-94, the City Council awarded the above-referenced contract for the purchase of sealcoat aggregate material to be stockpiled at the Central Maintenance Facility for the 1995 sealcoating program. • The material has been satisfactorily delivered in accordance with the contractual requirements and final payment is now in order. Agenda Information Memo May 15, 1995 K. PROJECT 643.RECEIVE FEASIBILITY REPORT/ORDER PUBLIC HEARING (OSLUND-TEVIBERLINE ADDN- ST REHABILITATION) ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To receive the feasibility report for Project 643 (Oslund-Timberline Addition- Street Rehabilitation) and schedule a public hearing to be held on June 20, 1995. FACTS: • On 2-1-94, as a result of a public hearing held for the above-referenced project, the Council denied the public improvement. • On 6-2-94,the Public Works Committee performed a field review of the streets within this project area and subsequently recommended that the City Council reconsider this project through a new public hearing process. • There has been ongoing correspondence and communication with Mr. Sven Borgerson regarding the issues he raised concerning easements and drainage. The summary of these discussions will be provided prior to or at the new public hearing. • As a result of a new Pavement Condition Index(PCI)evaluation,there has been a noticeable drop in the PCI rating indicating a significant expenditures of maintenance dollars for temporary patching will be required without project approval. ISSUES: • Since the last public hearing, staff has received numerous calls from affected property owners expressing support for this project and requesting the City Council to again discuss its merits at another public hearing. ATTACHMENTS: (1) • General location map enclosed on page 5-0 . • R f_ £ NyNMY A . 494 1 �J J t4 �AMIN Ilkvir mi X11 Yli . I�� a A ONA , �♦ __I Hi I, nil „L11 ��8� �' _nf n: t I II 46d. MN ■■IIII f7 ►A � ` nfrmnn -f�4110 P ( f .:ems/ T,..♦ir)1.i, _ 1 Irrrftds Ai ` ■■iutr AN. allaillir., L ogra.....:=. NM _., MP ihr, As• _ i Fr NMI A _ �L..... U11�1�� , G !•,, I II i 1I( LQN RD �,,l��r� swat���', 04 1� rr G J► ■aaa\ ._. •:iI,rr:=_ o , IliaawL- l iiv� I .rt .■ a ,^ 11I- 1 =�[ mum r 'u' 'orl ec k".7"Pil, _ 7....,_ • �` Timberlin = ' o Al . .;ft.e. ! 11111 . 1 .ir ,�'aae+� f it)�1� -f i,-- r: IJ • • \#1 �� A�%.... I j. . Ws:e i - „� • = a NI i o: w i L Y DOOIDLC RD mar paw ROAD { a la i am Cpl y".:1., f ■ if.r ,... y i / t - ,.� �/ lily AM u, MN I :* Wi ■► In Iuuut*w lir nLI t':1 M B rr ! i7�► 11�40////l, ..........rrl il► ILI -.�� • �ti��+1 tH r •a =�r ::::f:::� d ar�� {►i:�, �i��wt�I�l: �Y \rp �' v.;ry Wei a1r ■I w \ ♦ �t?t-. 'V �. ri{pUr �ti �I •.„., �� sok t►„iii _,�� �L� � 'a,tVAL%L 'aLituiu IIIHi'=6=-ir . iA�+i�irt�� 4i. ■f►��1 i�v� .�� r��l��� -s�_��sil tr ri�4•�. �� 1 '4%, =:Albs: , 4 • �. -radio .. .` `)it*rte NESQOTI RD tl11�`+�`,,,,�i 1►���.1 � j � *► ilk'1 i��+i+.4 IV”Nei,o�.16 ∎ "� � �• L.rir,— li ito li\ 1 1 ` -. ♦ 1.l, ♦,r ..�i►'.S ./►� /�. AA o 1000 2000 I Scale in feet • LOCATION PLAN lii Bonestroo Rosene EAGAN, MINNESOTA FIGURE Ander/1k 6 Associat a STREET & UTILITY RECON. PROJECT No. 64 1-0 49532R03.DWG OCTOBER 1993 COMM. 49 2 Agenda Information Memo May 15, 1995 L. PROJECT 688.RECEIVE PETITION/ORDER FEASIBILITY REPORT (EAGANDALE CORPORATE CTR- STS & UTILITIES) ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: Receive the petition and authorize the preparation of a feasibility report for Project 688 (Eagandale Corporate Center- Streets&Utilities). FACTS: • City staff has received a petition from the property owner(Donald L. O'Dell) requesting the City to prepare a detailed feasibility report for streets and utility improvements to the proposed Eagandale Corporate Center Addition located in the northeast quadrant of Lexington Avenue and Yankee Doodle Road. • The petition guarantees the costs of the feasibility report if, for some reason, the project is denied as a result of the public hearing process. • Later on the agenda, under New Business, the Council will be considering the preliminary subdivision of this development. ATTACHMENTS: (1) • General location map enclosed on page Sy • r3 a. = . el 1 O2 W ci.IX Z 11 l O IX o 1 ^ UW i'Q -WtyZ a ii Z 1 Z ". J 0MO w CP 4...) Cs [[ I © a O /� b ) _, r I J 6J cp c, p J I I .: I ii IR r 'L 11 1 lig 4a:A 1 . 2 i..) U I I S_ ( E 'i5 MY j lit, ,1 1 ..,.. 0. i ! imo.4 r `� �r1 %., fa u 1 , 11—it J- u �1 • I R s i 'h c t , Y �i 1 L...4411111111111, jil I (I, lw p i il La • Alk, (#fir).;: pat Ugit' , ' dY ...iv. . T - I , 1 + I • _ _ I I a � ' ` qI� 3 V „ ' Eil'I II 3t1MBn ! �NOl'�Npf3l 6.. — _ � , 1 ' i Agenda Information Memo May 15, 1995 Eagan City Council Meeting M. FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS - DENIAL OF VARIANCE FOR WENSMANN PROPERTIES ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: To approve the Findings of Fact and Conclusions on the denial of the variance for the Wensmann property west of Galaxie Avenue and southeast of I-35E. FACTS: • At its meeting of April 18, 1995, the City Council considered this variance and moved to deny subject to preparation of the Findings of Fact and Conclusions. • The City Attorney's Office has drafted the attached findings for Council consideration. BACKGROUND/ATTACHMENTS: (1) Findings of Fact and Conclusions - pages 5 through ' , c) SENT BY: 5-10-95 ; 4:41PM ;SEVERSON WILCOX SHEL-, 612 681 4380;# 2/ 5 • RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF EAGAN RESOLUTION DENYING WENSMAN PROPERTIES APPLICATION FOR AN 18- FOOT VARIANCE TO THE 30-FOOT SIDEYARD SETBACK REQUIREMENT FOR LOT 6, BLOCK 1, SAFARI ESTATES 2ND ADDITION, LOCATED EAST OF INTERSTATE 135E AND WEST OF GALAXIE AVENUE. EAGAN, DAKOTA COUNTY,MINNESOTA. This matter came rm before hearing before the City Council of the City of ER6au on April 18, 1995. At the Apni 18, 1995,public hearing, the Council heard from all interested parties and considered the matter in conjunction with all the files, records, stuff reports and proceedings herein. BASED ON THE FOREGOING, be it resolved, by the City Council of the City of Eagan, Dakota County, Minnesota, that the application of Wensman Properties for a variance of 18 feet from the 30 foot setback requirement for Lot 6, Block 1, Safari Estates 2nd Addition, located cast of Interstate I-35E and west of Galaxie Avenue is hereby denied based upon the following: 1. The applicant has the burden to establish compliance with City Code provisions and specifically Section 11.40, Subd. 3(c) of the Eagan City Code. • 2. The Comprehensive Guide Plan for Lot 6, Block 1, Safari Estates 2nd Addition is D-1 (Single-Family)and the property is zoned E(Estate), 3. Estate zoning requires a minimum of 20,000 square feet for the lot and larger setbacks than single-family zoning. 4. The adjoining houses meet the setback requirements. 5. There is adequate area on the lot to build a structure that would comply with the setbacks. 6. Lot 6,Block 1, Safari Estates 2nd Addition, is not unique in its physical characteristics. f 4f1 L-, SENT BY: b 10 05 ; 4:42PM ;SEVIRSON WILCOX SHEL) 612 681 4360;# 3/ 5 ?. Tlar.pautug.uf 11w yivt,uncl veuinui is onttuy to the intent of the Zoning Ordinimee and the Comprehensive'Aide Ylan ihir4'rrgniw largrr.lotc and larger setbacks than single family development. • 8. This property can be pat to a reasonable use. There is no demonstrable • hsmdship in putting the property to a reasonable use within the ordinance established setback. 9. Allowing the encroachment of the setback area would change the character of the neighborhood in that it would create more crowding. 10,. Allowing an. encroachment into tbe_setback. area would lower the neighborhood property values. 11. A home ieasuuably euulJJ lac wnsl.u4lca1 and meat the ti..e requirements of the private covenants and the Eagan setback requirements. BASED ON THE FORFCiOTNG, the City Council of the City of Eagan finds that the applicant has not met its—burden of proof--set out in Section 11.40, Subd. 4(c), paragraphs 1, 2 and 3 of the Eagan City Code and that the application is hereby denied. Dated; May 16, 1993 CITY OF EAGAN By:Thomas A. Egan Its: Mayor ATTEST; By: E. J. VanOverbeke Its: City Clerk Agenda Information Memo May 15, 1995 Eagan City Council,Meeting N. FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS-DENIAL OF PRELIMINARY PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AND PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION - SAFARI AT EAGAN ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: To approve the Findings of Fact and Conclusions on the denial of the Preliminary Planned Development and Preliminary Subdivision for the Safari-at-Eagan development located north of Cliff Lake Center and west of Thomas Lake Road. FACTS: • At its meeting of May 5, 1995, the City Council considered this Preliminary Planned Development and Preliminary Subdivision. The City Council took action to deny the proposed planned development and subdivision and directed the City Attorney to draft appropriate Findings of Fact and Conclusions. • The City Attorney's Office has drafted the attached Findings of Fact and Conclusions for City Council consideration. BACKGROUND/ATTACHMENTS: (1) Findings of Fact and Conclusions - pages 5 7 through . • 5co SINE BY: 5-11-95 ; 9:46AM ;SEVERSON WILCOX SLIEL 612 681 4380;# 2/ 3 • RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF EAGAN RESOLUTION DENYING FORTUNE REALTY'S APPLICATION FOR PRELIMINARY PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AND PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION. The Advisory Planning Commission of the City of Flag=held a public hearings on this matter cm Fehr-my 28, 1995 and April 18, 1995.The Advisory Plaiming Commission recommend denial of the application at its February 28. 1995 and April 18, 1995$ meetings. The.aplilin iIiim was then heard'by tho mug=City CouuKil .Al May 2, 19A.5, M the May 2, i OA City council utvatiug, the Council heard from Wtec it*d parties and con.siuclati we waiter in co4Junction with all of the files, records and prior proceedings, all of which constitute the record in this matter. -BASED ON THE FOREGOING,be it resolved,by the City Councirof tle City of Eagan, Dakota County, Minnesota, that the application of Fortune Realty for a preliminary planned development and a preliminary subdivision for land at Safari at Eagan 3rd Addition located north of Cliff Road and west of Thomas Lake Shopping Center on Outlot A, Safari at Eagan, is hereby denied based upon the following: I. The applicant has the burden to establish compliance with City Code provisions and the planned development. 2. At the public hearings and before the City Council issues were raised regarding (1) light intrusion; (2) height of light poles; (3) failure to lower the William's Pipe Line; (4)traffic congestion (which would require public improvements, potential special assessments and easement acquisition to alleviate the problem); (5) food odors; (6) mixture of family theater with alcohol; (7) increase in crime; (8) increase in late-hour noise; (9) incompatibility with surrounding residential uses; (10) unsightly berming; (11) location of trash receptacle; and (12) required improvements for ingress and egress to the subject property including on-street parking and overflow parking from adjacent uses. 3. The applicant's proposal does not adapt itself to the surrounding property by reason of the factors cited above and tends to lower property values of the adjacent neighborhoods. 4. Because of the issues and problems which are cited above, the applicant's proposal is not a benefit to the surrounding area or the community at large. SENT BY: 5-11-95 ; 9:46A1 ;SEVERSON WILCOX SHlL-► 612 661 4360;# 3/ 3 5. The proposal tends to cause an over concentration of activities with late- night hours in an area that has been designated in the City's Interim Commercial Land Use Policy as NB(Neighborhood Business). 6. The proposed activity would diminish the neighboring property owners ability to enjoy their residential properties. BASED ON THE FOREGOING,the City Council of the City of Eagan finds that the applicant has not met its burden of persuasion and the application is hereby denied. Dated: May 15, 1995 CITY OF EAGAN By:Thomas A. Egan • Its: Mayor ATTEST: - By:E.J. VanOverbeko Its: City Clerk Agenda Information Memo May 15, 1995 Eagan City Council Meeting O. CHANGE ORDERS/POLICE DEPARTMENT BUILDING PROJECT ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: To approve change orders for the Police Department-Municipal Center Expansion Project as presented. ATTACHMENTS: • Staff memorandum on page(..06 through( 7 . S-1 AIL MEMO —city of eagan TO: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES FROM: ASSISTANT TO THE CITY ADMINISTRATOR HOHENSTEINc A ' DATE: MAY 8, 1995 SUBJECT: POLICE DEPARTMENT-MUNICIPAL CENTER EXPANSION CHANGE ORDERS Attached are copies of seven change orders for the building expansion project. The changes represent a net addition to the contract price in the amount of$4,100.44. They are detailed as follows: 1. Primary Equipment - Change Order #3/pco #96 - Blocking for reused lockers - $68.22. 2. Lund Martin - Change Order #5/pco #93 - Install additional grab bar - $47.00. 3. Haldeman-Homme - Change Order #2/pco #92 - Additional shelving for interview room monitoring equipment - $445.00. 4. Bartley Sales-Change Order#2/pco#88- Miscellaneous hardware and bathroom mirrors (original mirrors to be incorporated in City Hall remodeling) - $571.20. 5. CLT Floor Coverings - Change Order #2/pco #61 - Delete carpet in basement corridor - ($1,035.00). 6. Petersen Electric - Change Order #13/pco #91 - Changes and additions to security and fire safety systems - $3,423.89. 7. AWR - Change Order #3/pco #73 - Roof systems modifications to accomodate equipment in mechanical shafts - $580.13. These items have been reviewed by the staff and consultants and are in order for consideration by the City Council at this time. LePD CHANGE ORDER PCO No. 96 PROJECT: City of Eagan CHANGE ORDER NUMBER: 03 • Police Facility Eagan, Minnesota INITIATION DATE: April 13, 1995 APR ) ft i cv... TO CONTRACTOR: ARCHITECT'S PROJECT NO: 624.A Primary Equipment CONSTRUCTION MANAGER'S PROJECT NO: 9423 6420 West Lake Street St. Louis Park, MN 55426 CONTRACT FOR: Bid Division 18: Lockers & Benches CONTRACT DATE: Nov 01, 1994 You are directed to make the following changes in this Contract: o Provide all work associated with the following item(s) as per your memo dated April 13, 1995: • Provide blocking for TEC lockers. ADD $68.22 TOTAL $68.22 Not valid until signed by the Owner, the Architect and the Construction Manager. Signature of the Contractor indicates agreement herewith, including any adjustment in the Contract Sum or the Contract time. The Original Contract Sum was $ 39,000.00 Net change by previously authorized Change Orders $ (4,049.00) The Contract Sum prior to this Change Order $ 34,951.00 The Contract Sum will be increased by this Change Order $ 68.22 The new Contract Sum including this Change Order will be $ 35,019.22 The Contract Time will be unchanged by ( 0 ) Days The Date of Substantial Completion as of the date of this Change Order therefore is per original contract. Recommended by Construction Manager Approved by Architect E&V, Incorporated Thorbeck Architects Minneapolis, MN • Minne m l apoli's, MN By: /� J'—�7L`Zc ' By: (De W J.A.---1 Date: 47 / 3/1 5` Date: 41/,...cp/4g Agreed to by Contractor Authorized by Owner Primary Equipment City of Eagan St. Louis Park, MN Eagan, MN t'A B Date: 4°I 7-17,5- Date: By: Date: CHANGE ORDER PCO No. 93 PROJECT: City of Eagan CHANGE ORDER NUMBER: 05 Police Facility Eagan, Minnesota INITIATION DATE: January 25, 1995 TO CONTRACTOR: ARCHITECT'S PROJECT NO: 624.A Lund Martin Construction CONSTRUCTION MANAGER'S PROJECT NO: 9423 3023 Randolph Street NE Minneapolis, MN 55418 CONTRACT FOR: Bid Division 05: Carpentry Mark No.: 300-050 CONTRACT DATE: June 22, 1994 You are directed to make the following changes in this Contract: o Provide all work associated with the following item(s)stated in FCA No.44,dated March 16, 1995,as per your proposal dated March 14, 1995: • Install one grab bar at intoxilation room 164. ADD $47.00 o Provide all work associated with the following item(s)stated in Bulletin No.32,and as per your proposal dated March 9, 1995: • Delete installation of two (2) stone memorials. DELETE $0.00 TOTAL $47.00 Not valid until signed by the Owner, the Architect and the Construction Manager. Signature of the Contractor indicates agreement herewith, including any adjustment in the Contract Sum or the Contract time. The Original Contract Sum was $ 130,500.00 Net change by previously authorized Change Orders $ (1,691.00) The Contract Sum prior to this Change Order $ 128,809.00 The Contract Sum will be increased by this Change Order $ 47.00 The new Contract Sum including this Change Order will be $ 128,856.00 The Contract Time will be unchanged by ( 0 ) Days The Date of Substantial Completion as of the date of this Change Order therefore is per original contract. Recommended by Construction Manager Anaroved by Architect E&V, Incorporated Thorbeck Architects Minneapolis, MN Minneapolis, MN By: 172. Date: '(-/D- 5 Date: el-/Z4/4 Agreed to by Contractor Authorized by Owner Lund Martin Construction City of Eagan Minneapolis Eagan, MN • By: f By: Date:_ t-/---/2—Q,55 Date: By: Date: • • CHANGE ORDER PCO No. 92 PROJECT: City of Eagan CHANGE ORDER NUMBER: 02 Police Facility Eagan, Minnesota INITIATION DATE: April 10, 1995 TO CONTRACTOR: ARCHITECT'S PROJECT NO: 624.A Haldeman-Homme Inc. CONSTRUCTION MANAGER'S PROJECT NO: 9423 430 Industrial Park Blvd. Minneapolis, MN 55413 CONTRACT FOR: Bid Division 15: Casework Mark No. 300-150 CONTRACT DATE: June 22, 1994 You are directed to make the following changes in this Contract: o Provide all work associated with item(s) listed in FCA No. 46, dated March 17, 1995, and as per your proposal dated march 17, 1995: • Deliver& install three (3) 24" x 12" shelving in room 253 and three (3) 32" x 12" shelving in room 237. ADD $445.00 TOTAL $445.00 Not valid until signed-by the Owner, the Architect an-d the Construction Manager. Signature of the Contractor indicates agreement herewith, including any adjustment in the Contract Sum or the Contract time. The Original Contract Sum was $ 73,914.00 Net change by previously authorized Change Orders $ 20.00 The Contract Sum prior to this Change Order $ 73,934.00 The Contract Sum will be increased by this Change Order $ 445.00 The new Contract Sum including this Change Order will be S 74,379.00 The Contract Time will be unchanged by ( 0 ) Days The Date of Substantial Completion as of the date of this Change Order therefore is per original contract. Recommended by Construction Manager Approved by Architect E&Y, Incorporated Thorbeck Architects Minneapolis, MN • Minneapolis, MN By: . -� By: Date: /D 9 S Date: 11/b/15 Agreed to by Contractor Authorized by Owner Haldeman-Homme, Inc. City of Eagan Minneapolis, NON Eagan, MN By: -^�7- / "'"' By: Date: Date: By: Date: • (Q3 r!-" CHANGE ORDER PCO No. 88 PROJECT: City of Eagan CHANGE ORDER NUMBER: 02 Police Facility APR 1 , 1`,j Eagan, Minnesota INITIATION DATE: March 30, 1995 TO CONTRACTOR: ARCHITECT'S PROJECT NO: 624.A Bartley Sales Co., Inc. CONSTRUCTION MANAGER'S PROJECT NO: 9423 6509 Cambridge Street St. Louis Park, MN 55426 CONTRACT FOR: Bid Division 19: Specialities CONTRACT DATE: June 22, 1994 You are directed to make the following changes in this Contract: o Provide all work associated with the following item(s) stated in FCA No. 45, dated March 16, 1995: • Furnish one ASI 3500 series grab bar for sink in room 164. ADD $85.20 o Provide all work associated with the following item(s) stated in FCA No. 25, dated February 1, 1995: • Furnish to job site one 16"x16" access door for masonry wall. ADD $45.00 o Provide all work associated with the following item(s) stated in FCA No. 47, dated March 28, 1995, and as per your proposal dated March 20, 1995. • Furnish two (2) mirrors 56" x 36". ADD $441.00 TOTAL $571.20 Not valid until signed by the Owner, the Architect and the Construction Manager. Signature of the Contractor indicates agreement herewith, including any adjustment in the Contract Sum or the Contract time. The Original Contract Sum was $ 13,970.00, Net change by previously authorized Change Orders $ 244.95 The Contract Sum prior to this Change Order $ 14,214.95 The Contract Sum will be increased by this Change Order $ 571.20 The new Contract Sum including this Change Order will be $ 14,786.15 The Contract Time will be unchanged by ( 0 ) Days The Date of Substantial Completion as of the date of this Change Order therefore is per original contract. Recommended by Construction Manager Anaroved by Architect E&V, Incorporated Thorbeck Architects Minneapolis, MN Minneapolis, MN By:" 7 y'li/ ( -Tz/_'Z}-- By: 11. Date: _'V_ r' y.5` Date: 4/24/46 ,, Agreed to b Contractor Authorized by Owner Bartley S es City of Eagan St. Louis ark, MN Eagan, MN I 1� By: / By: Date: c — — Date: By: CoDate: CHANGE ORDER PCO No. 61 • PROJECT: City of Eagan CHANGE ORDER NUMBER: 02 Police Facility •• Eagan, Minnesota INITIATION DATE: January 11, 1995 TO CONTRACTOR: ARCHITECT'S PROJECT NO: 624.A CLT Floor Coverings, Inc. CONSTRUCTION MANAGER'S PROJECT NO: 9423 2400 Pilot Knob Road Mendota Heights, MN 55120 CONTRACT FOR: Bid Division 14: Carpet and Vinyl Flooring CONTRACT DATE: June 22, 1994 You are directed to make the following changes in this Contract: • o Provide all work associated with the following Item(s) stated in Bulletin No. 21, dated December 7, 1994, and as per your • ,'' proposal dated December 14, 1994. • Delete carpet in Corridor B01. DEDUCT • ($1.035.00) - • TOTAL ($1,035.00) • Not valid until signed by the Owner, the Architect and the Construction Manager. Signature of the Contractor indicates agreement aerewith, including any adjustment in the Contract Sum or the Contract time. The Original Contract Sum was $ 46,486.00 Net change by previously authorized Change Orders $ 0.00 The Contract Sum prior to this Change Order $ 46,486.00 The Contract Sum will be decreased by this Change Order $ (1.035.00) The new Contract Sum including this Change Order will be $ 45,451.00 - • ,.b;; . �The.ContrFt;Time will be unchanged by . .. - (0 ) Days -kte1 0,Dale•' f Substantial Completion as of the date of this Change Order therefore is per original contract. `••r .•, C�.,_i�i ,. , - - :;:� -�;` Aooroved by Architect•Jam• y`.w*' •,A i• 'E&V,. . �''- '�� ' Thorbeck Architects •.ne � Minneapolis, MN By: Pe�'3�T�✓�� By: .t! tOCd .(n•-le-�—. Date: I— G!9S Date: 4/24/4 5 Agreed to bv_.Contractor Authorized by Owner CLT • .r erings, Inc. City of Eagan Mende, 1'b, Eagan, MN B . , A By: Date: liWiWi r Date: By. L� LJ/(`,t•�, Date: Ca:5 CHANGE ORDER PCO No. 91 PROJECT: City of Eagan CHANGE ORDER NUMBER: 13 Police Facility Eagan, Minnesota INITIATION DATE: April 10, 1995 TO CONTRACTOR: ARCHITECT'S PROJECT NO: 624.A Petersen Electric Unlimited CONSTRUCTION MANAGER'S PROJECT NO: 9423 12903 Pioneer Trail Eden Prarie, MN 55347 CONTRACT FOR: Bid Division 25: Electrical Mark No.: 300-250 CONTRACT DATE: June 22, 1994 You are directed to make the following changes in this Contract: o Provide all work associated with the following item(s) stated in Bulletin No. 36, dated March 28, 1995, and as per your pricing sheet dated March 28, 1995. • Connect sprinkler valve indicator, & four additional switches to fire alarm panel. ADD $1,236.29 • Relocate Card Reader from door 147A to 147B. ADD $495.29 • Provide conduit& box system for door monitors in rooms 127 & 131. ADD $840.50 o Provide all work associated with the following item(s) stated in Bulletin 38, dated April 3, 1995, and as per your proposal dated March 31, 1995: • Relocate existing shredder receptacle. ADD $695.35 o Provide all work associated with memo from City of Eagan dated March 30, 1995, and as per your proposal dated April 5, 1995: • Add additional card reader at door 204. ADD $156.46 TOTAL $3,423.89 Not valid until signed by the Owner, the Architect and the Construction Manager. Signature of the Contractor indicates agreement herewith, including any adjustment in the Contract Sum or the Contract time. The Original Contract Sum was $ 417,905.00 Net change by previously authorized Change Orders $ 3085.84 The Contract Sum prior to this Change Order $ 420,990.84 The Contract Sum will be increased by this Change Order $ 3423.89 The new Contract Sum including this Change Order will be $ 424,414.73 The Contract Time will be unchanged by ( 0 ) Days The Date of Substantial Completion as of the date of this Change Order therefore is per original contract. Recommended by Construction Manager Approved by Architect E&V, Incorporated Thorbeck Architects Minneapolis, MN Minneapolis, MN By: By: j/. Date: V/71�1'S Date: 4. 2.7/45 Agreed to by Contractor Authorized by Owner Petersen Electric Unlimited City of Eagan Eden Prarie, MN Eagan, MN By: By: Date: 14, `�S LQCO Date: By: Date: CHANGE ORDER • PCO No. 73 PROJECT: City of Eagan CHANGE ORDER NUMBER: 03 Police Facility Eagan, Minnesota INITIATION DATE: February 24, 1995 TO CONTRACTOR: ARCHITECT'S PROJECT NO: 624.A AWR, Inc. CONSTRUCTION MANAGER'S PROJECT NO: 9423 3023 Snelling Avenue Minneapolis, MN 55406 CONTRACT FOR: Bid Division 08: Roofing and Related Sheet Metal CONTRACT DATE: June 22, 1994 You are directed to make the following changes in this Contract: o Provide all work associated with the following item(s) stated in your proposal dated February 7, 1995: • Move 2 curbs, cut EPDM, move blocking,and refasten and reflash curb for relocated ductwork at mechanical shaft. ADD $580.13 Not valid until signed by the Owner, the Architect and the Construction Manager. Signature of the Contractor indicates agreement herewith, including any adjustment in the Contract Sum or the Contract time. The Original Contract Sum was $ 69,952.00 Net change by previously authorized Change Orders $ 2,114.00 The Contract Sum prior to this Change Order $ 72,066.00 The Contract Sum will be increased by this Change Order $ 580.13 The new Contract Sum including this Change Order will be $ 72,646.13 The Contract Time will be unchanged by ( 0 ) Days The Date of Substantial Completion as of the date of this Change Order therefore is per original contract. Recommended by Construction Manager Approved by Architect E&V, Incorporated Thorbeck Architects Minneapolis, MN Minneapolis, MN By: '' Y\ 1) c< ,k By: Date: 3/0 /ei 5 Date: 4/2.1/4G Agreed to by Contractor Authorized by Owner AWR, Inc. • City of Eagan Minneapoli , MN Eagan, MN By: By: Date: 3 � � Date: By: Date: Ce Agenda Information Memo May 15, 1995 Eagan City Council Meeting P. CHANGE ORDER/CIVIC ARENA DEHUMIDIFICATION ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: To approve a change order to the dehumidification system for the civic arena in the amount of $7,900. FACTS: On March 7, the City Council awarded the bid for the dehumidification mechanical system for the civic arena to Alta Mechanical of Prior Lake in the amount of $87,910. Since then, it has been determined by staff that the performance of the Desi-Air dual wheel unit would be more effective for the civic arena and would realize a cost savings in operation over the other unit. Depending upon what operations take place at the civic arena, the additional cost of $7,900 would be paid back in 2-3 years, and the City would continue to realize a cost savings in years after that. ATTACHMENTS: Staff memorandum on pages 62( through ')0 . l MEMO _ city of eagan DATE: MAY 10, 1995 TO: TOM HEDGES, CITY ADMINISTRATOR f,' FROM: KEN VRAA, DIRECTOR'OF PARKS AND RECREATION SUBJECT: DEHUMIDIFICATION SYSTEM - CIVIC ARENA ISSUE To review issuing a change order to Alta Mechanical to install an alternate dehumidification unit at an additional cost of $7,900. BACKGROUND As part of the civic arena construction, a separate bid package was received for the mechanical system - dehumidification. The Council awarded that bid on March 7 to Alta Mechanical of Prior Lake in the amount of $87,910. REVIEW OF ALTERNATIVE UNITS At the time of the submission of proposals, the project architect and staff reviewed the proposed dehumidification units. The determination was to proceed with the Munters Unit because it met minimum requirements and, as important, helped meet the overall project budget. At the request of staff, the project engineer/architects have subsequently reviewed the performance of the Desi-Air, dual wheel unit. Their review shows that the Desi-Air can be operated at greater efficiency and also provide some air cooling during summer months which the selected unit could not. During summer ice operations, the Desi-Air unit would provide for increased savings as a result of a decreased load on the ice refrigeration unit. Although it is difficult to calculate precisely, it's been estimated there could be a savings (in electrical consumption) of $2,100 at the current electrical rate, during summer ice operations. L2 A calculation has also been made showing a savings of$1,050 for electrical consumption during normal operating periods with this unit. Again, there are certain assumptions made about schedule and heat loads to get this number. It can be concluded that a rough estimate of savings, as follows, could be realized. Operational savings over selected unit $ 950 Reduced demand summer electrical 2,100 Reduced demand normal operations 1,050 $4,100 The change order would result in adding $7,900 to the cost of the project. The pay back period, assuming only the operational saving and reduced demand savings, would be 3.9 years. This figure would drop to less than 2 years if the arena were operational in the summer. SUMMARY The City awarded the dehumidification system in March. The unit proposed would adequately meet the needs of the Civic Arena. Significant savings could be realized-by installing the Desi-Air dual wheel unit. The pay back in a reduction of operational cost is estimated between 2 and 3.9 years dependant on building use. , FOR COUNCIL REVIEW AND ACTION To approve a change order to the dehumidification system in the amount of $7,900. • cls/dehimid.kv Agenda Information Memo May 15, 1995 O. PROJECT 681. CONSIDER REOUEST TO MODIFY SCOPE OF PROJECT (N.NICOLS ROAD- STREET RECONSTRUCTION) ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve/deny the request to expand the scope of Project 681 (N. Nicols Road - Street Reconstruction)to incorporate an urban road design along the east side of Nicols Road. FACT: • On April 18, a public hearing for the above-referenced project was held to consider the reconstruction of Nicols Road from Silver Bell Road to the north along with miscellaneous utility improvements. • At that hearing, Mr. Lester Spencer(3786 Nicols Road) expressed several concerns regarding drainage, trailway and rural ditch vs. urban curb and gutter design criteria. • While the public hearing was closed, the action to approve the project was continued until the May 2 meeting. Staff was then directed to meet with Mr. Spencer to discuss his concerns and present a recommendation for Council consideration on May 2. • On May 2,the staff was then able to get a concurrence from Mr. Spencer to accept 100% of the costs associated with modifying the project from a rural ditch to an urban design with concrete curb and gutter at an estimated cost of$3,250. After hearing additional input from Mr. Spencer, the Council did not authorize the scope of the project as presented at the original public hearing and left the project to be constructed as a rural ditch design. • Mr. Spencer has submitted a letter requesting the Council to reconsider and authorize the installation of curb and gutter along his property. However, he wants to receive a 75' corner lot credit and will agree to a maximum cost of$10 per foot for the remaining 192.66' ($1,926.60). • The City's Special Assessment Policy for street reconstruction states that 100% of the cost of concrete curb and gutter shall be assessed to the benefitted property. ISSUES: • If any credits are allowed or maximum assessment rates established, the City's Major Street Fund will have to finance any difference up to the actual cost. • A decision to reaffirm or modify the scope of the project should be provided as detailed plans and specifications are proposed to be presented to the Council on June 6 for authorization to advertise for competitive bids. • ATTACHMENTS: (1) • Letter from Mr. Spencer enclosed on page 7.2-- • General location map enclosed on page -7 3 May 8, 1995 • Eagan City Council Eagan City Hall Re: Project No. 681 Lester Spencer Property Dear Councilmembers: Apparently there was a misunderstanding about the curb and gutter. I have been told that you thought I did not want them and ordered the project without curb and gutter. I do think curb and gutter are necessary and would like you to reconsider and put the curb and gutter along my property. I understand I will be assessed the cost at $10. 00 a foot, except for the 75 foot corner lot credit I have coming. Also I still think there should be a catch basin near my driveway. Sincerely i,ester M. Spenc r cc: Mike Foertsch 71*-- pr A 11-1!! \ / 0 1000 ,•K c)-(3'P // V cl-‘'' / PROJECT LOCATION c"\-' ■ S 39 ‘41111r Ec21\�G 13 HAZE J v 'Ad RD `��dm SILVER%, � I .j RD. W Q 1 °- f to -J T27N 77 W 1113 R24W '23W \<c� �q 7-''s 1 ® 18 �� ��. y1/ '.24 19) / j ,I'� / // (, is i Ice .4/- ;c2..\).c .\ /� JP L v ��/ / P. v L �P PALE / 1....J ? SEW pg. . . Z r- EST } S I B L E Y L i a` l C4RNE �/ ENE v1 P� 5 I �� C I AN ,�I�r 4A, CHEL SEA �V�` a �E 44 Cy'9 ER �� ' �` M cq JADE � �,�, e PI �� S� A Rq��q� V il o P4 c EA031 EX1 �vs5 I` GA A dR Az A VSIF NICOLS ROAD �� � ° �� CITY OF EAGAN PROD. N . LOCATION MAP ` ci- CONSU1STI OClidERS ty F ���C1 n Agenda Information Memo May 15, 1995 R. APPROVE CONTRACT W/DAKOTA COUNTY SOIL & WTR CONSERVATION DISTRICT FOR EROSION CONTROL SERVICES ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: Approve the contract with Dakota County Soil & Water Conservation District and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute all related documents. FACTS: • The Water Resources Coordinator and Assistant City Engineer have determined that it would be beneficial to have a dedicated individual available to review development and public improvement plans to ensure that erosion control measures are being properly designed and incorporated into the proposed improvement. Also, the City does not have adequate staff available to provide the continuous inspection and enforcement measures necessary to ensure that erosion control efforts are being properly maintained by the developers and/or contractors. • Several years ago, the City had a contract with the Dakota County Soil &Water Conservation District(SWCD)for similar services and the program was very successful. All costs associated with this program would be charged to the developer's escrow account or the public improvement. ISSUES: • City staff has been unable to provide the level of erosion control management due to current and projected workloads. This interagency agreement will allow the City to provide the level of review and enforcement necessary to contain erosion and thereby protecting our natural resources. ATTACHMENTS: (1) • Copy of contract enclosed on page' .- -74 DAKOTA COUNTY SOIL AND WATER � CONSERVATION DISTRICT Farmington Professional Building 821 Third Street Suite 100 Farmington, MN 55024 Phone: (612) 460-8004 FAX: (612) 460-8401 Memo • To: Rich Brasch, Water Resources Coord. From: Lisa R. Rohr, District Administrator Date: April27, 1995 Re: Urban Services Agreement Enclosed is the revised contract between the City of Eagan and the Soil and Water Conservation District. I believe all changes have been made, according to the phone conversation that we held. Please review and sign the contract. Once the contract is signed, please return the original to my office. The Board of Supervisors will be meeting g on May 9th. If possible, please sign and return by that date. Thank you for your patience. Contact me if you have any questions. • AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER I C AGREEMENT Between the DAKOTA COUNTY SOIL & WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT And THE CITY OFEAGAN RELATING TO URBAN GRADING/EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN REVIEW AND SITE INSPECTION SERVICES THIS AGREEMENT is made by and between the Dakota County Soil and Water Conservation District, hereinafter referred to as the "District", and the City of Eagan, hereinafter referred to as the "City". This agreement is entered into between the District and the City for the administration of the urban erosion control services. WHEREAS, the District has the capabilities to provide the needed assistance; WHEREAS, this technical assistance may enable the City to make informed decisions and control erosion occurring in new development areas; THEREFORE, both parties agree to the following: I. TERM OF AGREEMENT • The term of this agreement shall be from the date of signature of the agreement to and including December 31, 1995. (■0 Erosion Control Contract page 2 II. TERMS) OPTION A. This agreement is automatically renewed on an annual basis unless terminated by either party. B. Written notice of Intent Not to Renew shall be given by the District or the City at least 90 days before the expiration of the Agreement term as specified in E.hibit A. III. SERVICES TO BE PROVIDED - SWCD The District shall perform the following work, as per the conditions of this agreement: A. Review of preliminary Grading/Erosion and Sediment Control Plans Using the criteria and procedures contained in the Minnesota Construction Site Erosion and Sediment Control Planning Handbook , hereinafter referred to as the "Handbook", review the plan for adequacy (cover page of the Handbook is attached as Exhibit B). If the erosion and sediment control plan does not meet the criteria set forth in the Handbook, written documentation of which criteria are not met shall be presented to the designated City representative. This activity shall be completed within two weeks (10 working days) of District receipt of the preliminary grading and/or sediment and erosion control plan. It is further understood that the District will complete its review of the plans in the order of priority as determined by the City. B. Review of Final Grading Plans/Erosion and Sediment Control Plans Following the criteria identified in the Handbook and recommendations made by the District under section III.A, review the adequacy of the final grading/erosion and sediment control plan. If the plan does not meet the criteria, written documentation of which elements are not adequate shall be completed within two weeks (10 working days) of District receipt of the final plan. It is further understood that the District will complete their review of the final plan in the order of priority as determined by the City, and within the shortest time frame available. C. Meeting Attendance Upon request by the City, the District will make every effort possible to have a representative present at pre-construction and staff meetings to review and discuss any erosion and sediment control practices contained or recommended in the erosion and sediment control plan. D. Site Inspections & Enforcement Site inspections will be performed by the District for the time periods listed below. An inspection report, Exhibit C, will be completed for each site visited and retained by the District for future reference. ► 1. Prior to the start of any grading, excavation, or filling. ► 2. During each "phase" of construction, but no longer than 7 days between inspections during periods of activity. ► 3. Upon request by the City. Erosion Control Contract page 3 If the site does not comply with the District's recommendations, the District shall draft a letter to the developer or designee, indicating the areas of non-compliance, those erosion and sediment control practices that need to be installed, and an implementation (time) schedule. A copy of this letter shall be sent to the City. A follow-up phone call and/or site visit with the developer or designee will be made or scheduled by the District within 5 days from the issuance of the noncompliance letter. A representative of the City will attend all scheduled meetings. • IV. PROJECTS TO WHICH SERVICES APPLY Services shall be provided for construction or development projects as mutually agreed to by the City and District. V. EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN INFORMATION The City agrees to provide the District with a copy of the preliminary and/or final grading and erosion and sediment control plans. Items required on the plan include: IN- 1. Name, Address, Phone Number of Developer •▪ 2. Signature and Company responsible for erosion and sediment control plan, if different than above ■3. North Arrow ►4. Scale ►5. Property boundary and lot lines 10.6. 2' contours (dashed existing with solid proposed overlay) _ ►7. Extended existing contour lines a minimum of 200' beyond the property lines ►8. Directional site and lot drainage arrows ►9. Percent of slope for streets and parking areas ► 10. OHW and 100 year flood elevations for ponds, wetlands and lakes N. 11. Basement floor elevations 10- 12. Utility plans in the area of proposed development ► 13. Limits of clearing and grading ► 14. A site map that identifies vegetative and structural erosion and sediment control measures to be installed ■ 15. A narrative that describes the project, site, and erosion and sediment control measures. VL PAYMENT FOR SERVICES Payment for services not listed in the following Fee Schedules, shall be made to the District for materials and actual hours worked at a rate of$39.00 per hour. The District shall bill the City on a monthly basis with cost accounting information for each project being billed. The City shall make payment within thirty (30) days upon receipt of the invoice. 7s Erosion Control Contract page 4 VIL FEE SCHEDULE A. Detached Single-Family Subdivision • `��� <: :; ��:::>?:.viii i •��`c�on` .........:. ... k�a ���`e 1 - 5 $125.00 $39.00/Hr. 6 - 15 $180.00 $39.00/Hr. 11 — 15 $225.00 $39.00/Hr. 16 - 30 $300.00 $39.00/Hr. 31 - 50 $350.00 $39.00/Hr. 51 - 75 $400.00 $39.00/Hr. 76 - 100 $425.00 $39.00/Hr. 100 — Up $475.00 $39.00/Hr. DEFINITIONS: # of Lots - Total number of'lots included in subdivision plat, whether or not the entire area of the lots are to be disturbed. Flat Rate Fee - Minimum fee for time spent on plan review, including (a) field review, (b) office review, (c) travel, (d) clerical, (e) material, and (f) administration. Inspection Fee - Fee includes time and travel spent on the inspection of individual lots and general site development, temporary and permanent control measures, and a final report for the total area covered by the agreement. Additional Fees - Any staff, or special meetings, areas disturbed due to work not directly involved in the construction of individual lots, drainage and roadways, including ball fields, recreation area, etc., will be charged $39.00 per hour. B. Multi-Family Residential :;ui>�.Ti ii�ts�: .>:.>�>:<� ::�tat�`e:�<;>.;:::>:;:.<<.:.::<•:•v;�<<:;����'e ..s t> �'.:°� >`��' ��>::�• 1 — 5 $150.00 $39.00/Hr. 6 - 15 $225.00 $39.00/Hr. 16 - 30 $300.00 $39.00/Hr. 31 - 50 $350.00 $39.00/Hr. 51 - 100 $400.00 • $39.00/Hr. 100 — Up $500.00 $39.00/Hr. Erosion Control Contract page 5 PyFINIT1ONS_ # of Buildings Units -Total number of individual buildings. Flat Rate Fee- Same as single-family. Inspection Fee - Fee includes time and travel spent on the inspection of individual lots and general site development, temporary and permanent control measures, and a final report for the total area covered by the agreement. Additional Fees - Same as single-family. • C. Commercial, Industrial, Roads, and Drainage, and Other `Area:�::>:<::::>�:::; ��� :��`�.:;:;::;> >:�• �:t:>';>°�`:>�'> .I s• ....::..:.: .. 'r•.;:yytty.�;.;;S.s.;'.::•:•?,,�;:•;i.• :�;,..5•: y,•;;!vx i;:..:._.;cy,.:::f{"fR:2jSfi}r,.S>f+S.>•y.r>•;;{.... ::�:+;fir;::*:%'::•Y': ';::s .Cv.n'#.,,C.`.d°... > ..5. •. '�.t•. v<3:,.•:Styr ox<;�`•`p?S..•w}a;;o; fir:. 1 - 5 $150.00 $39.00/Hr. 6 - 10 $225.00 $39.00/Hr. 11 — 25 $300.00 $39.00/Hr, 26 - 50 $350.00 $39.00/Hr. 51 - 100 $400.00 $39.00/Hr. 100 — Up $450.00 $39.00/Hr. DEFINITIONS: Area - The total land surface area, in acres, involved in all construction related activities, including but not limited to easements, ingress and egress, general site development, drainage facilities, stockpile areas, and cleared areas. • • Erosion Control Contract page 6 _ VIII. INSURANCE The parties agree that they will at all times during the term of this Contract, have and keep in force, at their own expense, insurance of the types and amounts outlined below, covering any injury caused by any act or omission on the part of each party in the performance of or with relation to any of the work or service provided to be performed under the terms of this Contract, in the following amounts: Workers'Compensation - Statutory Minimum. Such policies of insurance shall apply to the extent of, but not as a limitation upon or in satisfaction of the indemnity provisions herein. IX. INDEMNIFICATION The District shall indemnify up to the limits of its insurance or the statutory limits, whichever is greater, hold harmless and defend the City, its officers and employees against any and all liability, loss, costs, damages, expenses, claims or actions which the City, its officers and employees may hereafter sustain, incur or be required to pay, arising out of or by reason of any negligent or willful act or omission of the District, its agents, servants or employees, in the execution, performance, or failure to adequately perform the District's obligations pursuant to this Contract. The City shall indemnify up to the limits of its insurance or the statutory limits, whichever is greater, hold harmless and defend the District, its officers and employees against any and all liability, loss, costs, damages, expenses, claims, or actions which the District, its officers and employees may hereafter sustain, incur or be required to pay, arising out of or by reason of any negligent or willful act or omission of the City, its agents, servants, or employees, in the execution, performance, or failure to adequately perform the City's obligations pursuant to this Contract. X. SUBCONTRACTING AND ASSIGNMENT Parties to this Contract shall not enter into any subcontract for the performance of the services contemplated under this Contract nor assign any interest in the Contract without prior written approval of all parties and subject to such conditions and provisions as are deemed necessary. The subcontracting or assigning party shall be responsible for the performance of its subcontractors or assignors unless otherwise agreed. XI. DELAYS Neither party shall hold the other responsible for damages or delay in performance caused by acts of God, strikes, lockouts, accidents, or other events beyond the reasonable.control of the other or the other's employees and agents. • 9 ( Erosion Control Contract page 7 XIL MODIFICATIONS Any alterations, variations, modifications, or waivers of the provisions of this Contract shall only be valid when they have been reduced to writing, signed by authorized representatives of the District and the City, and attached to this Contract. • XIII. MERGER The entire and integrated agreement of the parities is contained in this Contract which shall supersede all prior negotiations, representations or agreements whether written or oral. All items referred to in this Contract as incorporated or attached are deemed to be part of this Contract. XIV. WAIVER The waiver of any of the rights and/or remedies arising under the terms of this Contract on any occasion by either party hereto shall not constitute a waiver of any rights and/or remedies in respect to any subsequent breach or default of the terms of this Contract. The rights and remedies provided or referred to under the terms of the Contract are cumulative and not mutually exclusive. XV. TERMINATION The District or City may terminate this Contract without cause and for any reason whatsoever upon giving at least ninety (90) days written notice thereof to the other party. In such event, the District shall be entitled to receive compensation for the services provided in a satisfactory manner up to and including the effective date of termination. The District shall provide the City with all work products upon receipt of compensation for services. XVL LIASON/AUTHORI?ED,REPRESENTATIVES/NOTIFICATION A. Liaison To assist the parties, ensure compliance and provide ongoing consultation, a liaison shall be designated by the District and the City. Mitchell Johnson, Urban Conservationist, shall act on behalf of the District, at 460-8004. Mike Foertsch, Assistant City Engineer, shall act on behalf of the City, at 681-4646. B. Authorized Representative ►City: The Assistant City Engineer is the City Representative who has the authority to modify or terminate this Contract when so authorized by the City Council. ■District: The District Administrator is the District's representative who has the authority to modify or terminate this Contract when so authorized by the District Board. Erosion Control Contract page 8 XVII. NOTIFICATION Notification required to be provided pursuant to this Contract shall be provided to the following named persons and addresses unless otherwise stated in this Contract, or in a modification of this Contract. To the City: To the District: Mike Foertsch Lisa R. Rohr Assistant City Engineer District Administrator City of Eagan Dakota County SWCD 3830 Pilot Knob Road Farmington Professional Building Eagan, MN 55122 821 Third Street, Suite 100 Farmington, MN 55024 XVIII. MINNESOTA LAW TO APPLY The parties agree that Minnesota is both the place of making of this Contract and the place of performance of this Contract and shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the state of Minnesota. All proceedings related to this Contract shall be reviewed in the State of Minnesota. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Contract to be duly executed. City of Eagan Dakota County SWCD By: By: Mayor Chair, Board of Supervisors Date: Date: Attest: Attest: City Administrator District Administrator Date: Date: Erosion Control Contract page 9 Exhibit A NOTIFICATION OF INTENT NOT TO RENEW The District, as evidenced by the authorized signature below, hereby notifies the City of Eagan of its desire to exercise its option not to renew the Contract between the parties, pursuant to Section II of said Contract. Terms or_ggnditions to be changed: • Authorized Signature Date Representing: Erosion Control Contract page 10 . . . - lIZNIIIIMIZITUIffneliMilliiillii 1 1 yl glilluantiffileefUNIMMINISII falialienialIIIIIIM.171■IIIIIIITNNTairlfrearafil■. %,..... .. . .. .. .. • .. , ;48N.;::);:*44:4474MakWi;;J:Y.:PPMW1:%ig ..4101. 4JfU:: ;. .1.0fglii:.- Z : f : ').".C5...?!. .Z.: :::!:'(:':::!.;:.:P ......:).:A.:,:.':;f: kO.:5 xt,...A,..,:cti.$,Z•Pft,, 3d..'::_..s4'„%,%,?%,'"::::,•,'JP,:q.,<....":1;ikAS.:::.6::::•,..t1::•••••:':.if.:••::.:.00,:',.....2;;5;:1,'•;::.?..L.:i•••:.:5_Vlir 41'::t*:We.:V;:•:(Z.I.:..:::...:"I::).;':::,•:• •••%;;;;Y:f•:!::::.:::).Z•7:1•1:7•::::).•:f.E.:.e::i'f?'•::);,:::ii.:,'.::%,..r:::::::::'..";..:::....;•iii'''.:•:•%•%•,:....:•:;'. ••':"g4zot.,;;;'•.*:-......,,"Wir./.r15::::',1::::: ::::$.2.:.?:•••At.::::::::;:::Z:::.:1:,:;;;;-:".::g.q;:::::.nWOR.:K?:,.,::'. .:.:',56:;:::•::::•A:::KX:•;AN:•:;:y•if i::::':::::;•;:•;?2.;:;:...Z;:f:::::1:;:::•:.i.::;;F:.?::::::.::;<:.??....?;:::?:•:.::::;.:,..:•:..•:?;.:n.;;;.K ee....:.:.::;K:.:.:.:::.:.:::.:::,..':...:•:::,:•...:.:......:2..,..:;• 6,41:•1•Z.,..Atlf0$16,4,7•:,,,,?,Itt::5 R'f 4,..*:%;;:,,,!,':_:::.:t,,A,:.k(1.,,*,::;:l..*%:;4.04„..N 2,:f.V.,*:.;:Mx_:•'*.a.p.a::::S:1,1:2:r:%%,•••4::1";::::•IWZ•i:".4:::;•:13%••:• :••••Z%:i.:**.g:.,:::41.::1••:;•!..e:.:::'.•:...,... ..:...:•-...>7.:::?:.•*g.,.:,",•:•:::,1,:.•:.:''•':'•.'!"".:.....'•........F:::::':". I i,":*•.P:K::-::::'&::.SPV-;.*::",<W,:.:•yg'N.1::::::..:;:ii.Z.NA1,:,(*':::.::1.:::::i4...4:.:r.,:i'f•':........................ .........................................................::::::::::.(:..i.d.itf....•.:•:.;•:.:•f:.:.;;.•••.:....:;"/•::.:;:.:::::;?.1::;.,:•::::.::••••::•.:••.1%.:,....:.i..;;;;:::::i;;::.:......-if•::...:;: ...::...•....i.....•::. ,..*;?::K.:•:•..1i.KplAtt:7%.*:**A . P.:: f:.:•:r::::i:•): ..f :'•*1:2.....:0:::;K,,,A'..sfi',;,,,'4::.:.,.*iii:•:?•*::::.:::?::•':".....:",:.:•:::..:','i.::::f.:,:r..,,,::-:$21:1:::.::',:.::::::•:::::;;.::::.::;;;:%.*::.1:,;;,.:.:":•:.:4:,.:.•,...:•:K,•:;i:;:.„-:.••: .:i:....,;F.,: : .,. •:: 1:V ??.:A;:114,V%.,4r...rAX:f:•('•nii3A.:.1:45•:::'W.L::::•:::::::::X,'•%‘2,,,::::':::5:): 0::$•":;%••: ,::••::.6,::•;.,:••?:':::,::::::: „....,':":.:•,::::::...=:•,::•;•••;..1:::%:::.:.ii::::•:•:.:.i::.:•,:,:::::••••:%:.•%.•:.::.:%:.:.••••••••”•,,:`:.••:•:.:•:•-•.:.••'• ... "i.„:,...1,-,„•,•••*Pf 5.,...r....4,Z,;:. :*:,:.,•:■••::•:::.:::•:% :::::$ :...1...:::::_?:.:::%.,.::•,•%•:,:::::.;:I,.•:%:..;:•:::{0:41•1::::',..:::::;:%:•.: ••'.:%,:":".::. : : ::::::: :..x:.;•••:„:;,.:::•..k.i.:::::.::•.:.:;.;.;.•::..::•;:::::...:„:;.:::I,.:•..:::.;„;...:.:•:.....:•:..• . ....., ... ::•..4.:"p„,%`•••0•.A.V”?::•::;::f••:•'::::.::`•X:::14.::.::::f:::••••,V.:.,:•%:::::$4::•:•:,...::.:::.:.:::::::;.:;:::::",:::•::',1".5•1•1;•:,•'',..•"f,•:::::•-:•••"'"''''' '''''''•''''•"'''''''"``'•4:, :M.;;;.,;..Z;.:.::....:,:14 i.....;:x...,......:.i....;•...:.::;;;.„.:.;;;„..,:•:..op.„••••••••••?•;•,.:••.. •::.• :7 .••.. . b.:•:::;,',`••";:"01r:SX":"•:•:::""°::••••••••:4•::.•5•:••'ek...f*•:?:5Zi'•f4i:4::•4•:•:••••:::•:•',1•:•::::::2:•::f••.i:il•.•••V.:::(::•:::: n••: :?•• -•:':i.:•:•':::'::•:%.•:•:::.:::::.:?:*:••?•■••■;:;•:::;:::•::..;:f.•:•::::•.:•:•••••::•::::„:;......::::.::.•••:•';';',.,;"•:•:••••.:•;•;••;..........*"..••.:• ; •:.:::••:.K..., „......*00...t•••':••?."fi::;•i•:::K.:::::•••*.,:•:4.N:•:::••••••••••::...;::1.,:•:::;.*:1K .:;:;M:iiii.ii:41•••:;.::1;'..::::•::P..k Exhibit B 111..,:i.s.::.:„.:.:::..„.;,:,......p.,:::::.....,:.:;:.,::::„..„.::...:............,..,.....:...,..,.......•. ... • .. 1,....sie,,,,it,,,,.,-...._.,,,,,,.:K.:,:5,:2„,:,:.::::::::::::.::::K,::::::::::::::: .::....;::,:::::,:.:,..:::.....:::::..,...›.::Rz::Q 1„...",..xt:.,..,.....vow....,,,...::::,,,,,,:::.;,,,,..:-:::.,.........:...:',::::,:::•.::::.::".M':::•:::;•;f:::%•:::::•%,::::, :,:..4.:•k•A:::w.!;:f.....„....4,;‘,%, ??.?;•.:.;.:•: ..:::::::;::.:•:„•::.r:::$:••„:::::::•••••••.f..,•:•,..............:•,..1::•:•:.:;:.....:•;.•,:•:•.:;.::.::.::'>. ••:••••••::4:•.:*:•::••••1:>::.•:.•,'''','"•:•::.••••:f••••%••••:•••:•••••:•'''•••:;:3::::•%•••:••••:'•c.:.1::r%•:•::•••:x".:::••••••••:':::::,..,,,,,,,,.......”,••••••••re•:•:•:•••••:•••::1••••••”•••••••:•••••:1::::::':':"••:••••••:?:::,;:.:•..,:r:5;..,::::;:::.:..xf.:•:••:•.•:•.••:::::$•••••:•::.:••••:..% ,: . •„•••••••••••••••::..• i....%••.0,..,i'••• •.?r••••)•:::..°0,1.0 .•::::"."..::.::•.;::::::::.'s:::::%.•*';,":::;.•••::::::::•:•:::•••,::••:•••:::1:;::::::::1::'•:::•:::.re''::*:'••:••:4:::• •••.,`'''::•::::".$••••::::•:•:::1,:•::•:•;.•••:?.?.:::.;.;:::••;:•::fk.:•:.;.;*;.:•:;.:1•?.::::',4".•:•:.:••:,..:•:::• •„;:::::.::.::::•;::•;•••:;•.4.::.:r;•:.:;::::.:•:::.:•:r.:•.:V.r.:;:• .:.•;...p.:i: ••••....„:„....:,..,.....,.••........•• +':•:::,..5,"•V$••'As•':•dirf •PJ•.6•?•:::•••••i:•••+:%:S:.0.,,' iiE.4:•:•>:•?..12:i.i.•:.i .:0:::..ii:•:••••X"..... 4:*•;"•:WR.1:;i::"..;7::::0.*:■9::•iYi•Sia::::.:::::::. :•5]..*:i.:X....?•.:;•:::':i.."1:;;:;:i:.?..::: .;;;;:it:47;c:•::::.::.:.*::::::•.Aci;'..::.$;•i'e.:::•••,;?•::A...:;.„••:::;;...::::;i:::::• e::;.•••.,:••• P,...14•0*..kV,:l.,t's;i5.:•.i:::•Ag;•:Val'..;c):L....iY.a....:•••••':i.:r:g;:i;.:.•::M:31:•'• :1'...0,5.*Ki.:M•i•.:•:s..4ig::•.;1:•i.•!.:!M:i":::•:::i::. :::::';.''.'::+*,•:A.•;.:'Igt:•,''..::?:::'Y:':;:•••:::::,:•••;.;:•;J:.;::f:.;%:.:....5::::.::;•::.;:.•: ...,::;•.:1'.•:.•:.1.::••.':•••:*.:';:.:7.4•••.. .:.:1••;•:. ...:•:'•••4,•;:;••••••••' •••••••.•:.:::::::.:',.....4(ne se•:••::•',....:•::::::•:•:,••••::•:.::••••.•:•;••:":•":::::::'::::::•;;.::::.•::.::::.::::•.x: :.:::':',:'•:.:::•:•:••::.::%••••••:M.;;;S:.:'1.4:1:::::::.::..:::•::::;.:::•>•••:::?:;;:•••::.:::•::::::,:::•.;•:::::::•:;.:.•s:%*.:::::.::•:•:.:.:....::.r.:;::•%:,::::,f;.,.:.;;;;;;;I„.:.......:.::xo...::,....::.::••••%•;•IK•;,;:.:•••••••i::.:.: •.:...:.:„...; ;• i.%1•3•4?:',.::',..'"; S.'•••:::::*:ef:::;,::::::::::::1::::::::::•:.:Y•::::.:*•::::•:::ff:•••::•::::;:':•‘:.::/:::::•;•:::.::::ift1"•;::•?...::::"•:•::::*: :,:?.::;;R:.:.•:(.::•.:•:.:;.:.,:::;*;:`,:::.;;.•:.:•:.::::•;;;:::•:::;%.*M:::f.x;;;:kr..;,..›..,::::::•.:::::*:•::::::i.,!..f.': :?::::.m.:•:•.:;...:.:2.;:s...r.:;:•:::.,.%;,:;f0•::::,:'::•.:;::::,•t;.;•,••;:....i;;;;„:..i....'...:.•.•::: Pi.e.'s'ealr43r40.:::::•V••:•::r••••••• •••Yg'Xi4::.?.."?.::T.:':::1:.•:::•;;?:':1;1:.::'::::;:.:::::••.:::::'.:::.:...:Zr;??.::::"g?:.N:••:::•:',...:1::.:.:.%:::e•:;?:•;....i::•::?•.:.::.2,:••••:•:?•.;:. ,%.':.;•;;;:;:••#::',...;: ;;.:iii:':•;?:::.:;;;::ii...;•,W...?;*:v*::??1.:::,:•: ••;:'•:q%•i:i':".....,:..i.:i:ii:n•..F.• .fii...;;;;;••::.•;:...:::::•::...: iii•••••■••:iit:•ii"V.M..":18'&;:"."'•;>:::a.:••••••:•2ni:t::3::•;44: ".:• ii"),..:* :..:::...i.•?.::••4:: •;•:"31.?;:.004.1:::::::::.:::::.:::;;;;"..1.4 :: "::::::'•••:: •RZPI•:•;:•;:v::•;:i.?.:;;.•;::.•:::•••:•;;:;K:,:i'ff.x:eg::;::•§:.:::::::::::„::).:..;.:..:•..nkf..:•::::::::••••••••;5•:>.:*i'•;;;;•::,..:.:1.2%:;,:.::,........V.:f.:••• *"......f.:-.•:?•*4.?•A;;;.::;"5:••••:W&XK'f'...F:;:::‘:.:K•i*:*•1:.::::::'.::;.:%•::•:::•3?:.tij•:.:::....:.•:::••.•:,...;••1.:.::::i:c:••A:::::.i6i,:e.i:Tf;.•,:;X:.,..,:•.i....,...q.::.:....;:•.•;:::...:,::; i;..!:it.....;••?::•.§.5.,!.:•,F.::::::::::.n;;;•:::5,.i.;:‘,...■.>.:•,•::;::::,:...:1•V;yi,:::.i...V.;22K i,.::•:•... ••:.•:...t...?.............:,...::::: .-.....:: '•:1:.'..e;4.'..?.ti, ••WS•n•l:'.??.•%.e.....:•:":"":.,..:C .....V•••Q:0•.:1•::::*25:4/:Zi(••:::.:::,:E:::•.,.t.'••:::?•.::.%;;.:*G.i::•::. :•:•:::::•...•'..:.....:::::•:•:,.;;......:..KkV. . .&.:.1..??:..k, K*5c.p.K6e;,::•;,:••::•:•:•::•••.,Ni.;....:(.:.:.•,:,..:,..:,.:•.•••:••••)......••••••,;;;.;.7.:. .:. aiiii9.4.x:4■:.1.1fr.;F:i.:JI:V.:..f.'..ie:::-..?...1:i.r•••■F•i.';::•••::;j0.:,fflig•:..4:::::%•!'....•';:;•••••••••:.'4•;;.;.•;..4:.:.:•::'.::::;:,..y.:....I.M1:.%.J1:`.•:..1;;Y:":.::::.;;:.::.*:.P..';'•:.:1:k.':....n;ii.:::•?;:.:•::1•:.';':: ::..1....:'•••••...:%.3.,•15%:P'i::•::::::::i:•?gW.:(..'q....::: :•;.F.r.li':;1•1%.. j:•`:.S.:(J:.•:::•.:J:....i i.......i.:,!..:......?. I img.A0r0P.vwgi%Tg.*; .. .N,gkAeiffo*FiNfig?.. : w . t.kvivit4Inpsg7X.:.0. Nw...4p..,....,......... .:,:i..!,.....: .:.....-,11 ...., . eA-V.::)":10%,.?*-JDA:::10:::::::::•;:::.g.::. .....i4.4:.: .,,,.:• ..::: . .::::•:4:::::.::• :,..,1,4•Dtk:.:::::,•:::•:.::: ;..:. . ::,:i::.: ::•,.••:.::...:•':)•:•:,•.::•.:...,.. (4.::: . .?.. .,.:.a.::::;:;-:::.i:..:..."......:;;;&:•:;.-crz-.::.•;.•:.:•.::::.i.:::•iii...is..::.:;•,:•,..::.f.......:::•::•••• ::::::::4;•::::::lare-::::"., ::res•:•::::':*:::••i'.••••:.: .. .:. :'.• .:•?:•::•0:':, _„;.::•:.P.1:).,-:P.N:•:::•:•:::::::.:::,:•..;:•:•. :,...::::,•:•::::..?:•:::::';:.:.:..:•..... : .:•:.:.::-.:•:•, .::•::::: ...i:-i.::,:i.:::.:::•:....;.....m.:;:.:•:•••:.....ii-..i.f.::11:.:.:.:::. i.::•.,........:•:?.:..:::::::::•••••.:::. .i.,,...??r:::".•:?....,:,...„ ...s...V0•i•V.:.:...:::::•::.:.',•••••:::'..i§.•:::::::*VV:7:•:::::•:*:..::::r::::'::'.•:::".:.::::::::::•::::;f::.1•:::•:::.:::),..::.:te••••::.:•:,•::::•::::.:::&:;.::t.:::: .:.;'•::.::%::'•)::..:.$::::.::::<:,;:...:::.:::••.•:::-:;•::::::::::::? : :..:i...:.:...:.::::):..:,:i.:.::..:::•::a....:.:.::•,:..:.::•::•5::,•,z::.i..i.....::.:•••...::•••.•:•:....)..•‘ :4:.3:::.:::•'44*•"<;•;:*3:::::••!...:.%::':::;*:•:;.-Aii::•••::::•::•::•*:::;:•;-.:::::::.;•;:.:1....:•:::•••:..::•:::,•::::::::•:...:••:•:::•::::•5:•-:•::•:'•••::iI'•y*•••::::•:'§V:E' :••.:...:;•.........*ft:::;.:•::::•• •":.:•::• ::::••:xig:.•::.:::::.::::::;:r:;•::::.:.:•.......:•:::..:3::.x•;.• .•:•:••••.:•:.:;;;.•:::;•:: :•:.......":.:•:.2::'.:••:-•, ,:t.:.::::.:,..:•,:.:?•?•••:•:•:.-• :::::•:::::'•:..<>5?*...15.:...1 :.:•: ':':::..,•••:.•: • !.....-.;::•;:','''?•-::'$'.."'-'' ,.....,..,::::.::;•.:::::.. . ' :::.:.•.. :•:••:.-.:4:•:,:-...:.:. •••••. ... .:• . :-•••••......:%:.:::4:?:•.•••:r r*:•:•'..:••••••:::::::Al•:" Minnesota Construction Site ::::.:• • • ::,..:•• : .',.)...: •••§..i.<..:- Erosion and Sediment Control ::::::::„.:.:.:,....,...,.• :..::::.:„.:.:::..••...• Planning Handbook .....:::::: .. .......:.,..... .., • _ . • .....• • ....., ,.:„..:.•••.:.:.:"...„.„. :. •,• • ..,::..... -,•:::::..:::::.•:.:.....„: . ...,...„.„....„:„.„::: ...„. . .. • • ,."•••"• . • ,:: :. .•••. ,.:•,,.r:::::.:::::::::::,...:: ,•,. ...." . .. L 1"• ••• •••:•••••:.•-•,... ,:•,•••::,,,,::,:.:.:„....:,:,,,,,: .-:.....::::,::.:..:::::...::-..si.:1:::.:?:,:::.:.,:.::.::::i'...i,:.1:"::;•.•:**:'':..••;.:':•••.•::K... .c.:. •:.:•:•-•,..:•::••;:•.:,•::',,•:•••••:>:••;::::..:•.•::.::::.::—' ••..,:•••;.:•••::•••.••... ,*:..:• .-)::. ... . •, ... ;;;;;5.....;•.!.:.;":.:Fj.:r..]:.:..:1‘0 .-• ..."- " " • . • . ... . •• .. s . • •• ." ' • :....::•:...,‘:::::::::.•:..:••••••• .:,::.,.•••':•::••••-••••••::•';..-:•::::•:,:••••••••••••:.•••;:.::•••:•::...::::.•)...::....:::•:::.:•,..*.:.::-..,::::•:::.:-.•:............v.I. :•:::.•.•:.-..:....•.....;•:.••.)...•........::::...E..........,.......:,..:........:. ....• -.........:....-..•.:• ... . . , . • :•.:*•••••::::::•!:::::::4 .1.?....::::,:;:.:::.k.;•:::",::::•:...;•....•:::.'.:::':.....*:::::•:•:.•::•::;:':*.;......................::::::::::......‘';::•J.:::::.:::'••:.1?f6f.:V•q:.:',.:*:-:......:;•:•:::••,i•::::::...1cri::*.:.:.:'?;::::;••:::•..i.;::::".:1*.::::::::1•::;.:'::::::::•••'.:i.:;;;;;;";...•:.:....':•;•..:7::..T.:;:::.::.:(.:?.:11......."'•.•:.,. ::.•••• •.. • ...::: ••••• ' .•:,....)•;:::*:.•••:-:"'li'i.......... :U1:'::•:::::••••::-:'••%::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::%•:".i:<•:;:f.::::*;:.• ::?:.::"•::..:::P:1•:::.:"::f.'.::::::.••::.::::::::::::: ...::;::.•7''''';'*••::::':.':::.::::3.::.1.:::'::::::....:;.:':::•:..:::1•7;:..k:-:::••''...:.::.?::.".:..:•:............-.••:.:*•••••... .::,..:•:•:.::.. •.• •.. • .......:•::'•::'::::::•::•:*::::•:.::•::::::;‘••••:is:i":::••'••?:'::::...•::.. ::•:•:,7:x..:.:•:.:i.•.........4'.•:-•.':.::':::%::‘:,•:,•,:::::.::::::*::':;::••:•:',.....:::•.•::•••:.•:•;:::..::K.:.:•110'.:..••••••:;:.i.;::.•.::...::,:....••••."•••••.:.-.:.•;:::::::::;.::::.:,........''......:`.:::,:•:.•:........••.•:::•;:7....•:;' .• .• • .• ...•••:• . ••.... .•::•.::'•••••:"".••••"'•;...‘•,""'"':•••••'-•:•:•••:•:;".:••:::•::-••:"••••:*•••:;:.•-:•:•••,....:v.v..... ,•••*,1*.::•1%.•••".:•.•••:••••••:•:••••••••.:. :..fr.::. •••••:,••:..•.:••••:*.•',:••••:•:••::•:::.:':::::::*(.:..:•'•••••::1':::':::::::::::::: :%;..:'.-....-........•...'.;;•.'.•:,'.• "'„„" ••.,:;.. . • ',.;4.:::••••••.;:••::.'•:.•:•:::•••.:C:i••••:"•';•:;:••:•i*•:::'••::.:•••"•: •:•: ;:i••• •: ••: ::•: :•?1:•••:••:?:::j.i.::•,:•••.:'T.'':::;.:'••:.'"i".m:;.:*.;;;;••":•:&•?..::•:""••••:•*'''.5::::.,:•••::.::':":„;::.•::::::;g•....:.::::••••:;;;:;•„•:•.,•.•:.,•i;.:'•;:•••*.e'I. •..,:;7 -• • . '•• ;.• ;•; i .:::::•:.:::::.:..:.*:.•::i•••••:.•:*:.'••'i'••••':;i•il.:':::•?ii•:".:.":•::•'••••••:;,•:.:••••:.ii';;;:ii.:IT•"'i:J'i:;":•.''''..;:::.1.:::.::::::;•"%::!.*:i.?;••::.':::::?i,:: :: >J:C::•:.•1":a::.":Yi:.:'''•:....:.:*.''•:':::........ •::::••••:::::.•:':::::::;:::'•i'.''..;;:....i•:na:..:•:;f1:'::;":::::::::::::::::::::::i i.::::Iii•:;.::*:••:,:.':::•.....;•.:1::Fi.:....i:....::,•• •;.;;.•.•;:. •. .....-..'• I :.::,•.?"..„. :••:::;;;••'•••::•••••••:•;•:•;*:.:•••••• ••%•'::*•••::•''i::%%:.::•::,:•'''.'•:•••:::::••::*'•'.:•*:::'.:•.e.::i.i•••:.'6;:•:•:%:••••.L:::j:•:••••;•::•:::;:•:*•'•'''''::."i*.••''.......•:::::......:•....:::••••:'.........i S:;•::.....::%..:...'...........:•:k••:.;i':...:.:::•:'•'.1•:••:...,:X;.::.:•:,.;..,f, .•••.•.,..,..;::•, '...•• . ' • . i .... •••:•,..••::•.•••;.::::,:•:4•.:,.....f....?.....;•:::?.;•.•ef......:.:::.:•::X.K.::•:.....e.:,....;:....:;•:::.:••••4:V.'::::''',....R....".:V...:.....::..'•?:::'..3,:: :;*:;•..•....::.,...'.':..•...::'::"...::...;',-;:..::.,' .;::;..,::.:e.t.::;s:..w.:....:•.;..g...;;...:.1.•..,.:.............'-'. ..:,-.......''. . • .......; ;f:..5..Y.::::3:::*:'....:;:f..4..f.,•:.:::::._:::::•••:'":.'.:',.,..::::::::::.ni::::g.:V",:•:;:::::::::•:•'•.::•::........a'"':':.::•:*:::?•..i.;:y.:?...""i'.:',.:.•4::.'....q...,.:•:"..........i.,:n....:::: :::::.....,;.;.-....''',.-::•:....,:.;'''f•:•••••';'.':.::'........;;;.f...;:f...::.•••.:%:"..;;;':';'.;::....:...:i..:.................,...'......,:.:...•i.• •...• : . . •....: . .. ;......*:-g..:;.:.'.:f...::"2:".<•:•.'''':::.:...:.:..::.••':.'''$:.::':::•:*:•::..•:',.......:.::...'.....-:•,.'.:.%..::•:;.••••:‘,:-::*:.'.5.::::•.••:•:'.:,.;.:.::::,.:y...s.:.:.....,-;:•.::.:k ::.•:..:,......•..•.:•;::•:%..t.:,,,y;;:f.........................::.......;;;;;;....:....%.....:.:.....•..•....". ....•.. . • . .:'. .. , i:.:•:••••••:';•:•.'•.•:; ,`:•:',•?..kl.iirs.K.:.•;,:..:-..,:.'::.:...*:-'7:.:.:f.f..:.1.1'''''A.",.•.,:f:•-4.-'7'....:...4.......V.::: .:::..;.'.e.:;.1.;::::.;.F.'••'';',.:::$s.:.••• ...;....',.....:.','::':::.:-....p'..'....i...:..:.f.,;',:::•;:::•;'-;.:..';','.;..;:m.c.,....:„.:..y.:',..,......i....;....,......•-...,::..-...... .;..... . ';• ... I :,:.::.-':-e..?..:-.:::::::::4:'.:::......-..?:.:::::.::••••:,:::',":".-ir::::.:••••::.:"......;: :•:••';•:-.:*::••:":.:•••::::.:.:7::.k.:Y:':::-:::"::::.x.-:-:::•::::.:::::::.:••:::s..:-:)....::••:::.:.v..,.:.:. ::::::::.::::;....:::.•:...."•:::;:.::........::•,::..:::::•:••.:.:•:.•;:. •;.".,.:y.::::.."i:::::.•:-.......;;:::.:.::•:.:•.:......:•. .....:.... - ;• -..:• -.. i :::•••••••......................................................).4.)::.:.:.::::.:1,:;•.:•:::•::::'?..:..::"...::'.•:::::::.....::.::::::•:.:;•:::;...::::.::::-:•:::•4:;:•;:::.:]....:;:::;.:.:::•:;;•*:':•••:..::.:.:. ::."...::.:.::."....3':.%.•:......::•••••••;,,.::,...:-....................4....*.;;;;;;:.:•....t.,..:::•......:i:'.••-•.:%./...,,..-;t::..;•:.....•..:;;,.. ".. '. -s....;.:•• . '''.'....:...::::.''''::::.."... .?::..1•.*''''k.:;:•:•:?.'Vn•7.'..•:•:fir:[."...1':'. .:......:'''il.::.•:•:'.':•:•.:•••',.':'.:::::•:.:.i.:::::::.:.:"?.:?....,%T.1::::".:::....................................::.....:"'0,:.1Z '....**5'...:•••:•:•••••:::''''''.4.::•.:•.•*.:••:...U....:::::;:•::::::..i.t.:;:.Y.;:ii•;.:.:;.'....;,...i.:::•......:;•.:.•;::;:*;.'.........:.•:•1...;::.- ..-•:.t..;•i'.,......: : •.....:.. '.•:';':',•::•.7.;:ill.,:•::::•:::::;.::.:';'';'.1.a.'*..:"...:?.:::::•..:0::..:....:;:;:i......','''.::::: :.''''''::::1:2:::.:::•;•:';i•::.:::::::.:4::::::•:.2.?';':**':::::::;::?:1'.".'.:.:.::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::1::;.:?;.;:•::.:i:::::::::•:...i.';;:::'•:::::.;:•..'Z''&:,::.::1.•.:ii.:;"1:::1.:;;;:§f:'.:•;;;;;:;:.::•;:".;:;::i;:;::::::•;'.....:::1!:::•:•:;T:: :•:::.::::::i.:•:::::.....••••:••••....,:•.......::,‘..S.'. ;•:•.. • I ;:•.:;i:::::::..2..::::•:1:::•.:•Y?....;:......:::.;),Y;•.:;1.1...5..'''.: :::'::•.;:::':.::..... .•'...•::.:::•:.'''%;;.•.:'......%•:.:..i::".i;:.1'2::•*::::?i.1.1::::':•:11::if•:...::.1.::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ''..;'..ri.s...*::::::':::.''...*:''':::•;.•....;:....:.:.:•::;.!•.".:::.:•.f.:11.i..Y:;;::);;:•,;•::•1,:,Ii."::••••;;'....f:.•::::;:,:.::::::5.•:-.... ....*.•'- '..•:',:: ......:• ,.•.. .' •••'•—•••••••••'''s"'•••:''''''••:•.4.:/•:''''''''"''''''''1:•:::.:::.1Y•N'f:".: ••:::':::::::::::::::::::Z3••■•.1F.'J:?..i:•:•.:"1.''''''''Ffr.."......;:::•:•:;::••••:?... ........•:.••.i.:.•i....:::*:•':.\•;:f.•:':::•••;;;;.:::::.::::if:::::::'1.:..r.:::.i•?:::::•.:•:::Y.:;:.::::•:::.:........:::.::.':::::::::::::::::::•...:5•••••••:::::•;::::.:••::'•••': "...: :::;•••:'''''.'..:.;?...?:':':':.:41:::::•.;:::1..:::::..s.::!;:.i..."-.1"?..:1:::::.::::.:;•?;''',;:;:.••.':::::.:":;...3g:':::6......;.:•:.:'.:.).::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::...''''....':;....i.:%.:.....;•:. ..:::::.n'..;::::.:'::.:::0;:::::.:-.i;.:::.;;;a..?1:!;;;;;;;;;';;;:::.;;;';;..s.:,i'::%::;:.. .:::',..;;;::: :cy:....c:••••....'....:"•:"::::::::':• -. • -• ..• , ,::::.,,,.........„.:::::::::„.:::::.::::::::,...„„:„:„:„:„..:.::::::::::.:„.".„":"::::::,„„:„...,:r.,:::".„:„.„.....:..":„::"",,".::::::..„ :::::::::.::::...,::::,::::::::::„..:::'.:1:::::::::::::::::::::::'..f 3';',::::1".:•••*.?: ::::::::::::::::::::::.:•.....::..;,f::.-•i..;.•.'•-- ' . . ... . ... .. ...:.• . ..::::: :....:•••..•:x*.....:.:,./...:.:.:•:),....:...:::1' • rii::::ke:,..,.:..,:7::T.%.. - 4:..0.::::::::::::::::::.:::::„...:::::1:•:•.::::::::..] :::::::.::•:::::.:::•::::::::::::::•::::::::...„::::::::::: ...: ,•:......„,::•.......:::„::,•::,:,:••:, ........„....„.....•.....„...„.„:::::::::.. Board of Water & Soil Resources .:.:::.:,..: ::::::.::,:.:•::::,•..... .....-,.....:::::::,...:..i.?„,:•;:::;:•:,:g2,:,.:,,,::::•••: '....'::::::::::•;.:;:m::.:.:.:::Zile:';'::;'.r:::''.:;.:4*:... • ..,:.,..;::..,."::....::.;..:X.:•-.:.:.,:.*:;;:......-........ all d .:",::.; :...:......::•::•:, , .,...,„•:.„..,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,:.. Association of Metropolitan !:„.„:„.....:.„•::•::::„.:.•,•:•,••:::•:„. ,::::::::,-,-•:........,:•• ... ,, . T.,,.:: •:*::::i:.• I Soil and Water Conservation Districts '.:.... •'• '... .:.....:.:: 's . _ •••••• • • .:.,...:::;I:.1.T::%:•;";:::'.:...::::'-.:,•:...:•::::'.,..-': ' • *:.*'''...••'.?•:.S''.'•...:;;;;.::;• " . ''.."'.:r."`:::::;` • . .-• ::•-..1.;',;-":?::§:•'!....rs•g.T... .i.i.::;:.•'•"''' • ' ;:*.f...:./'1..' ..3..:::'....,• • 7:.::::::"....::.i::::::::1:. . ..,. .:::4".:::•:• .. :'•••::::Y.:.••••'•::?.:•••1,:f"...'•":...1":k*ti::::•:':'..•• .:•,:pnts::::":',....-..,••••••:::•....:.-.........:4.....::::,:::::::::::::::::::::::•:..::•.:;•.:•:•?::...•.;:.;..,.:•;,...,:,::::.::,.,,•!•••••,•Y.....:....:.:•.•:•:{.::::::::::::.?i::;,:.•;•:::::::::;•:•:::%.;.;;V:.:....ir;;•::.-.:•:,::::...,...:•.::•.:3::•.•••::;:::,:••.:::•:.....••,;...,...,..••."..:. • - •• •:..••••••'':•::••:.•::::::.•'V*.::,...:........155,i'..:1■••••;t:,:*::::::::::::::::::::::::::::.•;...1:.?:',•:;:n...::.;: •,••••.•:;••:::::::::••••;:::.••:::`•::•::•.:.:.:.:::..:f.:::*;.:•v••-•::Y.•.;;;•:.;.;;;•••:`.•,›..,......:4:s.:•:::;::::„•:;;;;•••••:.•,;•.;:;•;:•„:...•:....::..•$•••:;;;;;;:.,,ff:'••;•:..• •;•..i........::..;•::::..•. •. '...".*:*"...f'•'+:•:::fr..."1:.•":•;;;;:::fi'l.::•iii•::::::.?••.•:'••::,...%.•...•••• •• •• • ••.• • • ••'••• '•:.:• •••- .. .: .•••-•:.:.• .. •• •', ••••;.•."•:.....'. • ..:;.::‘3...:'. •:-•••••••.• • ••••.:••:••'.•• . ...: .• .••:.:.•.. .. ,.. •••••*•:.:'::::•••:.•..cf::'•:••A:""'•:::.:••:;••••:V.:••••.••:•:•.:i..":*:;:•:•••:•••••:•••••:•••••••:••••'"•::::::Ti.::::::::::::•::'•,:.:`••,.:::.:::::::::c:::::•;:3::':.,:•*:.:••••••••••i:•.•:...:•:••:::::.::::.:::::::::::::••*:::•-........:*•:::•.:•:.•.::•:•./.::::;:•;•:•:•::.,::•:•:::::::::::z...:::..:fs....::..:.)::::::'::::::,.::;•••.:•.::::.'':..'.:'••-.....••••••..:• .. •":••••:•••••?••••••••••••••-:.::;.':::..:',..*::::1:1",'::i13:•..:':::•:'•:.:-:).*::•';:-:'::*".*:':'.:::::•:.:k:::*:..:.:.•::::%•.: •••.:::•::•••••••>:• ::-'•'•...•:.•:i%••;•"•::K-.;:•.:::::::';::.::::.:T•.:::•::::•:;.::....."-..:•:;•):::.,i:::::::::::,.',:•:';•::::::::.;:•.............. ,::`,.:::: ::::':::::••:.:::•.:Z••:::...•''.;:•::..-::::'::.:.•.'":...:..::::::-::Vi...:•• :.:.••.:. ;: 'f:'....g.:::::::::.ii::::.<,.".:•1:4:%5....U..:•>::•:•:.:S:;:::•:`;:•::::.:.:::',.:•*::.:.:":::::•:;•:,•::Z:',.::::::::.,:::::•:•!:.::A•::•::::::.:::::.::::•: ".?;*.•:,:.:.:;:i*::::.,":::..:;'::::::.f.:;:::.:..;.:"•......::.:.:..:•.::-....,.:.:..:::);i....;:::z::::::::•p'.:::::.:::.::•‘•:::::::::;:,:'..::':,:::::;:.:::::•::••••?.::::::•:::::,:•,.:::,.:,:.:.'.::::....:::.:::....". ...•..•••:..::.............•:•.• -:•••••:;.•••••••:::•::::..*"..:•.::*•••••):•:72:::::•:?••••••:•:-.:4:::::;.›..;:;•:•••..:::::••.:••:':::::::•:•f:1,:..:::.::::%:-.-:,:.:::::.::::::*:.:...::::•:•;:.:•:•:::,••••::::.:•:::;:&1::.:-..:.•:::•.:.:::,•••;.•.:::"::.:.::::•••:::•••:•".:••••);•...:::::••:••:::z-:::::::.:•••;f::::.,:.:...:.•:::::.:.4:::::,.....::.:::•:•:•:.:-:.:;•:).,::••.•.:::::::::,.:::.::.•:::-:3...:.:::::;•. ••...: •... ••••••:••:".:••:.••••,:•:-:•••::-s-:,.•:..::::;:•.::•:::::::•*::::•••:•::::::::..,...:•..:%,;:::::,•::•••:.,::....s:•:;...)::).•,:•:..;•::•::::••::::-.s.....-..:•-••,::::•::::••••.::•......:::•::•:.:..I.:?.••••••••:':',.....:.•••:••:•••::::••••:•••••...;•::::, :::.:::,&.••::,::.:::••••...-••:::::•:::,.:•••.:.••••••:•• :..4.•:.:;::.:..::: •:•:••..:.:•.:. -.••:,.•::)• . :-::,_.<-4••:::•••••:-....:s..A..::•:?...:•.,,........-...x.•-•••,:•:1:::-:).•:••••••••::,••••.,.....,•:.,?••••,,•••....:::-;:•:::.*:..,..,: :•::.:::::•;;....,:::.:.:.::.3.•::..u.....:::),:.:.•:••••::,:s:):••::.:::*.:::%::;;;;;;.:•::•:.:...,::,:::.......::;:::••••,•$::::..::•:;;;;;;;„::..:;...,.:..::*.??.:-:.:,:••••.....::•':::::•:••••••:'..1.4.•:••: .••,•••• •• :.;.."::•'•.:•:::::::::''...:::,":,•,.'...'1,:::•:',‘>,,:„.•;.'s•:•:....:..:•:•:•1'••••:::::*....••••„.:‘,:••,.::..:<:•:••:••••••:•:•••0'...::,::::&•>%.,..T.:.•::'::Ye.:,,...,.....:.ts"::.4::::::::•:,::•:%:•.;.*•::,..:::x;::••::,:,....::;:;;;::8:•:.•:":::•,•Y•...,:.•••V,:.....•••••?...:;:•:••••;:f.::•;•• :••••••:.........;•••.. .:.:•,:'•••.:::xt,::•.•:...,i•::.::.:.r.•,•••••.•:••••••:'•"'..•••. r. ::,::•:::.;•%.:IM:*::::::"::-::4:A:::;:-:•:•:::!i:::•:',::::,....,":?..*•*•::::::•':::g.,.fi':'::::.:'.::.::::•-?:.r::.....?::•.::.:;:.::.::1:::::.ci:f::::::i14)..;€::::.a.::::1.]:::.:::::::::A-::.:;•:.:*:,..nis::;:::::;;; :::$::::•-;.;;;;;;: it,::::::::::.::::'•.':::::::'?i;:i:::...........?••••...5..::;L:•::::: .:::::::.:::::•::::•:;;;',:::::::::':•:.•"•:,...-t..•,.: •:::•;.Y:i.....:::.:1••:%?.::::;::11:::,:1::!:::::::'::::•:::::::::::::':..1:::::::%:•:::::: :::•:1:i•;..;.:;:;.::c:g;;:;;;;:::::.:•::•::•:.:;:•::::::•:.•;:.:..i.:.:.,,..*:••..:•.•:.:••:i,....:,:::••"••;;•,:::::::,::::.;.....:.:.....:::•...:::,....1.........i:•.,,,,....,?::".::::::::::::... :::,:„.........:..••..:.:..,:,H:;................:f...:::::::................ . ".:1-:::::•':.:4.:•..•••:::•:::::::.::: '•:••:••% :::::.:::::V::,::::.;:i::%ik:::.::::•;:if::::::::::*-:::::-::::,:•:::.:i::::::::..:;::.:::i.....:..:."*.•:::::••::s*: '.7.::::•••!:.::%;:.•,,,:•:::•..:::::: .,.:::.;:: :.::•:•. '..:.:'::.'..f:.::'...•• • .::::..:... .....:is,:. .;. ;2 • . .: . ...„--......— .. ... ... . _ ..(5,...- Erosion Control Contract page 11 Exhibit C INSPECTION LOG Project Name: File No: Inspection Date: Time: Inspected By: Stage of construction or type of activity: ❑Arc there any denuded areas which require temporary or permanent stabilization? (CC-1) Problem: Corrective Action: ODo any seeded areas require maintenance fertilization,seeding or mulching? (GC-2) Problem: Corrective Action: ❑Is there any evidence that sediment is leaving the site and damaging adjacent property? (GC-3) Problem: Corrective Action: ❑Are perimeter sediment trapping measures in place and earthen structures seeded and mulched? (GC-4) Problem: Corrective Action: ❑Arc all structural practices called for on the plan installed in the proper location & in accordance w/ minimum standards? (GC-s) Problem: Corrective Action: ❑Are all cut and fill slopes adequately stabilized? (CC-s)) Problem: Corrective Action: GIs there any evidence of increased off-site erosion since the project began? (GC-7) Problem: Corrective Action: Erosion Control Contract page 12 Exhibit C INSPECTION LOG (continued) OAre all on-site drainage channels and outlets adequately stabilized? (c.c.$) Problem: Corrective Action: OAre all operational storm sewer inlets protected so that sediment will not enter the system? (GC-9) Problem: Corrective Action: DIs there any work going on in streams that may require stabilization or temporary stream crossing? (G-to) Problem: Corrective Action: OAre utility trenches being backfilled,seeded and dewatered properly? (CC-ii) Problem: Corrective Action: OIs there any evidence of mud on public roads at intersections with access roads? (CC-12) Problem: Corrective Action: OAre there any structural practices that should be removed because they are no longer needed? (CC-13) Problem: Corrective Action: ODo any structural practices require repair or clean-out to maintain adequate function? (CC-U) Problem: Corrective Action: Other observations or decisions made: Verbal/written notification given to: Completion date: Agenda Information Memo May 15, 1995 Eagan City Council Meeting S. PARKING REQUIREMENTS FOR CEDARBERG INDUSTRIES ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: 1. To concur with staffs conclusion that the proposed 55 parking spaces are adequate and sufficient for the Cedarberg Industries expansion. FACTS: • City Code provides that "where a specific requirement is not stated, the Council shall determine the adequacy of parking when approving a site plan" (Chapter 11.10, Subd. 13). • Staff has evaluated the Cedarberg Industry proposal and concluded that 55 parking spaces are adequate and sufficient without any proof of parking. ISSUES: It may be advisable for the City Council to delegate to the staff the responsibility for determining parking standards for those developments where the code does not specify a specific standard. Deferring this level of detailed review and approval to action by the City Council seems to add an unnecessary time and approval step for rather straightforward development projects, especially • involving the expansion of existing buildings. BACKGROUND/ATTACHMENTS: Staff memo on page xi through . - • 40111° MEMO city of eaaan TO: Tom Hedges, City Administrator FROM: Peggy Reichert, Community Development Director DATE: May 9, 1995 SUBJECT: Cedarberg Industries Introduction Staff is seeking City Council approval of parking requirements for Cedarberg Industries. City Code provides that "where a specific requirement is not stated, the Council shall determine the adequacy of parking when approving a site plan"(Chapter 11.10 Subd. 13). Current Situation Cedarberg Industries, located at 1960 Seneca Road, has applied for a building permit to build a 25,000 s.f. building. The plastics/mouldings company intends to use this space as office/warehouse. The City Code is not entirely specific about the requirements for their use. City Code would require 77 parking spaces. The building plans show a total 'of 55 parking spaces and 22 proof of parking spaces. These proof of parking spaces are located in the staging area for the trucks (in front of the dock doors). The owner employs 25 persons and expects that most of the parking spaces will not be occupied. The parking ratio for spaces required is one space for each 400 s.f. of parking up to 6,000 s.f. thereafter the City has used different ratio's such as 1:800 and 1:1,000. In this case, staff believes the 55 parking spaces provided on the plan as provided is sufficient without the proof of parking. Council Action To concur with staffs conclusion that the proposed 55 parking spaces is adequate and sufficient. Agenda Information Memo May 15, 1995 T. VACATION OF DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENTS (CLIFF LAKE TOWNHOMESI ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: Receive the petition to vacate drainage and utility easements within Cliff Lake Townhomes and schedule a public hearing to be held on June 20, 1995. FACTS: • Staff has received a petition to vacate two different drainage and utility easements dedicated over Lot 6 and Outlot C of Cliff Lake Townhomes. • All application materials have been reviewed by staff and found to be in order for favorable Council action of scheduling a public hearing to formally discuss the proposed vacation and receive testimony, if any. BACKGROUND/ATTACHMENTS: (3) • Location map enclosed on page • Outlot C description enclosed on page • Lot 6 description enclosed on page X33 (1 I fl T.n f \�v� -•WA Lril i�iq� ■^ ARPAR N a AA .11LOE L.AlE I � X11 1 DEN 4.. C Lir 4 PT. < „ LAIa■Ar N — i .I CORAL LAi CT. - -' —•�•t r I1BI 7 r J, f V. T OR rn ti R I WE'g• 1 1r N0. Ir '''''il g r• C7. Y1 W !II'gglTJ,_ li CAAPAT CAN A bA "Rf'NS,tl sNAu: pc f &1 Aa n.�r ARI( I� pp "Da K 7� rl _ R. / W , :fiJ ��rr y �C i -�I CL L 'w 4 6 �{ A i1 YAL`Ak L RAHN o �. c„ M PARK 44 CLrrr " c u 3� `�• ��; C LAKE `�� �" KOR�� M r \ C'y i CENT'R � � ��� � n RD. a p CO no. 32 . CLrF Rog) YI"' �I N.'CT. r - - - --- - - -- - � - - -- -`NOKa NoKU��� wAr � 86 'I ," I CALCATXIE NAr0 6 I 1 ()RAM WAY , 4 a' r' ' 'FRCS A`' �v ,� a o IR I KETTL C,LA111E ` sE u . `•y . I �x L., PIN OAK OR. PA .,� ��ti G, CT. ` w �`\�I♦' , • TE,I r ,v�i++ Ctc �� X11`Ly`' i i^i Icon o��N.� x �' try + 1 v V LANC / a(i IR•I5i ®,, A wh ^ 0"r1-- yC% AC C� KINGS RC A , Ij TpN_ C-14,r J ~, RIDCECLIFF PARK or I _ CAL -'/ r� Y GT• ....3 PT. In 17^SALEM/T. u1� N/i 1'iy i-wet PT. IS^AA .T(Jt PT. �Q T„ u 1 .\ :l / 1 S-ll/U IT. ;;:=wall 'L= /..\� - y rte\ VACATION REQUEST SITE I � city ' � r of eagan VACATION REQUEST approved: standard plate r _.�. PUBLIC East 10' of Outlot "C" and the ;� WORKS , North 13' of Lot 6, Block 1, SL 1 _ DEPARTMENT.J Cliff ,Lake T wnhomes 7( . . . • L E G A L D E S C R I P T I O N DATE: March 9, 1995 RE: CLIFF LAKE TOWNHOMES DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT TO BE VACATED The East 10.00 feet of Outlot C, CLIFF LAKE TOWNHOMES, lying south of the North 20.00 feet of said Outlot C and lying north of the South 10.00 feet of said Outlot C, /, / f' y/ . `'I 3 ;' ti f_,1 2 -•2 EASEMENT -+I v TO BE 061, ID .- Fr4 ;, r VACATED- rN 1 Lr� X 1 -.11 • ELY LIZENSIGI OF Ti(S llhE 01 OUILOF 0 � / I�1,»L 1 J ' \ C(°°Z --.- • L E G A L D E S C R I P T I O N DATE: March 1, 1995 RE: CLIFF LAKE TOWNHOMES DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT TO BE VACATED The North 13.00 feet of Lot 6, Block 1, CLIFF LAKE TOWNHOMES, lying between a line drawn parallel with and distant 5.00 feet west of the east line of Outlot C, CLIFF LAKE CENTRE and the following described line: Commencing at a point on the south line of said Lot 6 distant 118.39 feet northeasterly of the most southerly corner of said Lot 6 as measured along said south line; thence North 30 degrees 19 minutes 52 seconds West 36.55 feet; thence North 76 degrees 29 minutes 00 seconds West 57.01 feet to the point of beginning of said line to be described; thence on a bearing of North 151.7 feet to , the north line of said Lot 6 and there terminating. Bearings are oriented to the plat of CLIFF LAKE TOWNHOMES. a W .r, N NEST 3 M1 s " . .)-- ) . 1L\\\ ���`� 1 { .o�, ,51 `'m.'1 I I EASEMENT TO BE VACATED i, • I + ,5` 5-•'.. 1 w 5 /�� sI _ .4952 01•O:z• b■W 36•p' . / �./ orb QFt , i.• p�57-0 �...•• / :....D 0." 6a5 00 A,3 ri EASEMENT ...............,s .•/ `• 'q• :' \ I� 1'� 1.g. 1 I I j 14 r. ., e .,c> •P D,,,.2 --' :• o .% ..N• ,1 No _ .... '~ .►2 0 • 15 9 Agenda Information Memo May 15, 1995 U. VACATION OF PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY(T.H. 13 SERVICE DRIVE. EAGAN 13 INDUSTRIAL PARK) ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: To receive a petition to vacate the T.H. 13 service drive public right-of-way within the Eagan 13 Industrial Park and schedule a public hearing to be held on June 20, 1995. FACTS: • Staff has received a petition to consider vacating the platted public right-of-way as described. • Staff has reviewed the application and found it to be in order for Council consideration with scheduling a public hearing to formally discuss the merits of this request and consider any testimony, if presented. ATTACHMENTS: (2) • Location map enclosed on page ` ) • Legal description sketch plan enclosed on page r 1 LOST tog N U � ' COtANIRY CC 1AB W va . coRn d Atl - CEI _` ....f./ vfw AVE c N (,1• �vrw �vE. k I C or i� N ir Digiz 4 ...,....? ' • .irT y 1 r a -, �[� i RAMC ..)-■— PILOT^ '` KN090 I r Opp rc „ARK. , , Ile $ 26 I 1 G u 1, 1—. :,. I `�TOwCNVEw RD.r Qr(I�` i F 1 ' 1 ERR- y 1 lit AO---r-R--D. 1 r ,q. I , 4. i i;g.,, tisl 1 4Pti e I Ate ) J$, U m r I z I 1 o F 2 PARK 2 1 I ►• i O ...�� W L �I °jr CT Y/ I -- r' PT. / YANKEE D000Le ROAD I / WATER ` ' 1 V. 1( TREATMEN 3 , '° �1 P FACILITY ® q £Cnt. ► d / h O i CITY t. I WANT. • • •:•�h I �, FACILITY r® \jam . I DD N� I UAKA CA. il., 1/.1 1 VACATION REQUEST SITE I standard City of eagan VACATION REQUEST approved: plate #: r- ... PUBLIC STATE TRUNK HWY. 13 ' s ; u ll. ) WORKS • SERVICE DRIVE DEPARTMEN - . q,. 4.i o 8 rN .. 1 87'5 • - BONN 5 0• R Y' Tai•" M , ,./ ��., •III 1.`zwa C:;4;4.14, pool ,,,r.�, • I ::4 • \ 1 ::;: i. ii:;:::. ...-7 iiiii000111111. ■••• ) .:" ''° \ N :i.••:*:.:K:::::.; \ r • )1,4 L C-iii, pat .qe 1 L, : ay Ty w ;• •'' N set a ' r•' 4 tie so- ,,. \ .;Q :' Vac a 0.•""._,...,.• 0#' ''. i.: „ -- ';.•��'�.�''...•^' ' •• �. ‘J �' , N. yam:: 97:::.,..),, ----:. s w t_ i P4+1 4.4 0'.1 / • Y II!d/I I;;SII' K � ��I ....,.,.:°E:, Rggp , 01645 ht vl °A • -_; d°aI \v 86 h `e ae 09 o064° d IP ra 11 y o Cre ate e‘.0a set tet . 4a° \ es" h*A ti o- a a tiara y r a P° et o said L°t2 • yA P vie \at ./Nrksf(ktP�'006 ya∎aP Ot2tco past 9° ∎ • , o{Stake 1 ‘140Q tec�y ono 1 prof Saga Otter°ct mra .0... Khan ok SPA ee ro o.got 2g gays��r ecAy AtO0 • 1,, .emote 0 MN t:'O• °. ' oo 0 to t` so ,. .fr speepers a��35 0o{egt bra svleyo< 05441\yot 2 d 1995 R -9 . Mays, oats. Agenda Information Memo May 15, 1995 Eagan City Council Meeting V. RESOLUTION/SET PUBLIC HEARING/TAX EXEMPT FINANCING YMCA OF GREATER SAINT PAUL ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: To approve a resolution setting a public hearing for June 6, 1995, to consider tax exempt financing for the YMCA of Greater Saint Paul. FACTS: The City of Eagan is being asked to provide conduit financing for the construction of a new gymnasium for the YMCA's Eagan facility and for the construction of a new facility in Woodbury. The bond issue is expected to be less than $3 million and will have no impact on Eagan's ability to issue bonds for its own use as necessary. The City will have no financial obligations regarding the bond issue. The City will engage its fiscal consultant and bond counsel at the expense of the YMCA to review all documents. BACKGROUND/ATTACHMENTS: • loter from Mary Ryseth of Briggs and Morgan, outlining the transaction. pages through C i). q 7 FROM BRIGGS HORBAN SP (THU)I15.11.'95 16112 140. 141 PAGE 2 LAW OFFXCES BRIGGS AND MORGAN P110.731411203t62.ASSOCLa floor svoo rrxtsz 2c zow. x,aLxx svxzanvo 111W? rJVZ,)1171311111110TA e5101 zo SJI7PO ars texa R0•re0o r�osntxzta (e Sea•0460 *02OI2APOLIN olrssos NOD MS awn rvions s>aCT 211..17.,AMOK* May 11, 1995 rmoea.rors,mums=IMO* ssessars w+"101•41400 PACIIM? Ma)esa•Me0 (612) 223-6625 VIA FACSIMILE Mr. Gene Van Overbeke Finance Director City of Eagan 3830 Not Knob Road Eagan, MN 55122 Re: YMCA of Great Saint Paul . Tax Exempt Financing Dear Mr. Van Overbeke: The YMCA of Greater Saint Paul would lice to finance, with tax exempt debt issued by the City of Eagan, the construction of a new gymnasium for its Eagan facility and the construction of a new facility in Woodbury. • The YMCA is a 501(c)(3) organization under the Internal Revenue Code. Consequently, a city that issues conduit revenue obligations for the YMCA could designate the revenue obligations as "qualified tax exempt obligations"under the Code if the city reasonably expected to issue not more than $10,000,000 of governmental and 501(c)(3) obligations in 1995. The advantage to the YMCA is that this designation results in a lower interest rate and a larger market of purchasers for the debt. Since the City of Woodbury will issue over$10,000,000 of governmental bonds this year, the YMCA would like to have the City of Eagan issue the obligations for both projects. The City of Woodbury is required under the Code to give 'host approval" to the project. • Norwest Investment Sery ices, Inc. ("Norwest"), the initial purchaser of the debt, has proposed that the financing be done under a lease purchase arrangement. The following is a general description of the transaction: To-9.7% 612 223 6502 05-11-95 04: 06PM P002 #36 FROM BR1685 $ORBRN SP CTHU)15.11.'95 16112 NO.14 PROS 3 BRIGGS Amp MORGAN Mr. Gene Van Overbeke May 11, 1995 Page 2 1. The YMCA will lease the Eagan and Woodbury facilities to Norwest pursuant to a ground lease; 2. Norwest would enter into a lease agreement with the City, as lessee. The City's payments under the lease to Norwest would be payable solely from the payments it receives from the YMCA under the sublease described in 3 below. 3. The City will sublease the facilities to the YMCA pursuant to a sublease. The payments by the YMCA to the City under the sublease will be equal to the payments required under the lease. The City will assign all of its rights and interests in the sublease to Norwest, except for its rights to indemnification from the YMCA. Assuming the transaction as outlined in this letter is acceptable to the City, the proposed timetable for the issue is as follows: Monday, May 15 The Eagan City Council considers a resolution setting a public hearing for June 6. Tuesday, May 16 Public hearing notice sent to local paper. Thursday, May 18 Publication of notice. Tuesday, June 6 Public bearing and preliminary and final approval by the City of Eagan. Wednesday, June 14 The City of Woodbury holds a public bearing and gives host approval. The closing would be shortly after June 14, 1995. I will send you by facsimile the proposed form of resolution calling for the public hearing and the notice of hearing. gq R-97% 612 223 6502 05-11-95 04:O6PM P003 X36 FROM BRIGES NORBRN SP (THU)85. 11.'95 16:13 NO. 14 PAGE 4 BRIOGS Awn MORG,/.N Mr. Gene Van Overbeke May 11, 1995 Page 3 If you have any questions, please give me a call. . Very truly yours, Mary M. rseth MMD:mw cc: Ms. Kathy Cheng Mr. Michael Olauson Mr. Michael Zack D R■97% 612 223 6502 05-11-95 04:O6PM P004 #36 Agenda Information Memo May 15, 1995 L1c Art . S A. VACATION OF RIGHT-OF-WAY (DEERWOOD TOWNHOMES ADDN1 ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To close the public hearing and approve the vacation of public easements/rights-of-way over a portion of Parcel 47A, MnDOT Right-of-Way Plat No. 19-72 (proposed Deerwood Townhomes) subject to the following condition: 1. The final subdivision and plat for the Deerwood Townhomes Addition is approved by Council action and recorded at Dakota County with adequate replacement easements as required by City star FACTS: • On April 18,the City Council received a petition and scheduled a public hearing for May 15 to consider the vacation of public easements and rights-of-way as described by the attachment. • Notices have been published in the legal newspaper and sent to all potentially affected property owners and utility companies and circulated through City stag As of March 9, staff has not received any objections to this proposed vacation. ATTACHMENTS: (2) • General location map enclosed on page (c- • Legal description and sketch of easements to be vacated enclosed on page (03 and (0 . • ...... -):: �• I. ..i'2{, : ail,. _7 1 n ' • y /' j ' s v?, y I S= � � w/fr� I mum. wltt c 1. - .—AE s .w w �OU�iRr PARR i Oi3 / •.i RL5 i 0i 9.IMJMO1 h i own I , 'e,,, / •• 017TrLJ 0 c] 1.4PN0, `. , ,ii r.1 I t .-_ • — •%/, -- . .— i Y + to ��s�7 Saftl+/ `fM,N�_�f0 Ca 0 7 �C r/ dr. TREATMENT / (AEA tki I / �• FACILIT✓NW WEtN�.°' NE Ll NW W Y 1"� . NE r, arr / /43 ` j qty 9KY MILL /./ melo MAINT MINI n, ' .,• 1I O i . r„ • , • i3.•.ku/ PARK V *o P !1 ..( iT18. � ...„,..„—z---„,,,, S )� \ C /, 7-- _ 71•ti:,_ : ` �r 1 . j1 ' •.�/7• (`4i y xOLSL I Y' *porn • (' EO MM E l 1�... 1."•-{:.., • ICY �✓" 1 KuL.1LL\ Lf ' •� •�'1 E Pm C 4c` / T 417,./.;7---1� w S iii r-et`o'• COAIM. "- II'1'�`„�' 1� ,,,, t IGG', = Try _- •t< t ar cl I r -I y:� h y- . —^''� jj'''''' �v-CST— 4.1 • d I( Dam-• .13401-F-7. ....." SMTT ..—'r'`=..'i'' •�Kea q� `) Aq `�-MI PaUStr„...JI . • •.� //MV MYM/CIPAL _fj OZC rf.1tv4 V ' s rN i cENrLA .w4Lm.rs-4r 1{{{� la+firvrtM. I .4. „p Di u6# • „ '• NF •ll.�!� N r:i(i�. /....5 I '•L ^f6#NE I �;n' � 'I coi • VENPOIIr 1C.'4. 1 `6#, . w..i o��tL•Uwa. ' 1 -JLKJr—'u�N �ronnc4 •a„t �` 1�°.,?.""oGc■ GI�,fT^•Yl1 , Ana I:tNTELL AVEI1 - EII.00I I co _ L 2 1 tg y�rJNO r' - Lpll ° ftC01NTt •_ ^ ll^ •116#-3 EQ rat I$ �p�• wiL„ I 'TJ I T-.41.LESILL,�"p a�ARNEL I� T �; C cT. �� 7 0 ' j�MCr TAkd/� ON- •T aZ •'L.:• N 1 �`� O[UwGC•r �"477CCC�{,n�:9� � �•iai.• �.� I.• �l �1 '1 ME aLLw sr I6#. •' $ !_ Nu.t - I::- nJ J/N SW r tiNELL GLEN ' f / I ,i• ,i ^� Zoo/?IN LN CD tE PT t J �.I .�\«•,��a`S p�C7L -� ..,•; , S R-r.N�... —.;'' \'=``�fiu.E WOfL.11PKTNO 'T IPtM or „• W f ( ��y!_ syl'Lesytrwf, r MtC VT / ..___14 I` (Lt /7/414C.1 M�. rw. a 1 L. 'rlTi --Y ^7- I iiLLY-II•a. Wirt ■�"r_�/.is/ •)fW�L_dl_ ,yam 7. ru..1 l / i I Yi. ua Sr \ n n I f IL l•w\NS ll ( ? e, ,••! A.�`�'�' •--I �',�y/ ?� :1 1` .r. / '\t T I r LYW ` �J•\`\ ..1 rSGw 11„c.69611-11.1._ ,1 T i ( \=1 , I NW d , �y�f;lE L_L (.O_ra •>t .�, t ' l 1 u 1 gi T //c ,�j .r y urxc�M SR ,l' ..... .. I VACATION REQUEST SITE city of eagan standard VACATION REQUEST approved: plate #: T .�. PUBLIC WORKS HIGHWAY EASEMENT DE PARTMEN . . (0 -- ---- Z0'd "rd101 CHERRIER LAND SURVEYORS INC. Tel"' n. 753 -9983 LICENSED PROFESSIONAL •LAND SURVEYORS 1615 93RD Lan K.E. LEGAL DESCRIPTION! stain., MN 5541.9 TRACT 1 That part of Parcel 47A, MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION RIGHT OF WAY PLAT NO. 19-72, Dakota County, Minnesota described as beginning at B44 as designated on said right of way plat; thence North 28 degrees 03 minutes 59 seconds West 97.80 feet to B45 as designated on said nght of way plat; thence North 89 degrees 33 minutes 09 seconds East 160.44 feet to B46 as designated on said right of way plat, said 846 being on the North- South Quarter line of Section 21, Township 27, Range 23 in said Dakota County; thence South 00 degrees 30 minutes 39 seconds East 35.12 feet along said North-South Quarter line to B921 as designated on said right of way plat, said B921 also being the center of said Section 21; thence southwesterly 126.26 feet along a nontangential curve concave to the southeast, central angle 08 degrees 19 minutes 46 seconds, radius 868.51 feet, chord bearing South 65 degrees 26 minutes 22 seconds west to 844 also being said point of beginning. The basis of bearings is as per said right of way plat. TRACT 2 That part of Parcel 47A, MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION RIGHT OF WAY PLAT NO, 19-72, Dakota County, Minnesota described as beginning at B40 as designated on said right of way plat; thence North 66 degrees 32 minutes 33 seconds West 49.86 feet to 841 as designated on said right of way plat;thence North 23 degrees 27 minutes 27 seconds East 20.00 feet to 542 as designated on said right of way plat thence South 66 degrees 32 minutes 33 seconds East 64.93 feet to B43 as designated on said right of way plat;thence South 60 degrees 27 minutes 27 seconds West 25.04 feet to said 540 also being said point of beginning. The basis of bearings is as per said right . of way plat. TRACT 3 That part of Parcel 47A, MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION RIGHT OF WAY PLAT NO. 19-72, Dakota County, Minnesota described as beginning at 818 as designated on said right of way plat; thence North 89 degrees 33 minutes 09 seconds East 220.42 feet to B19 as designated on said right of way plat thence South 60 degrees 27 minutes 27 seconds West 106.11 feet; thence southwesterly 139.85 feet along a tangential curve concave to the northwest, central angle 10 degrees 25 minutes 36 seconds, radius 768.51 feet thence North 00 degrees 26 minutes 51 seconds West 108.14 feet to said B18 also being said point of beginning. The basis of bearings is as per said right of way plat. ('C) ZO'd .e06 £8. ZT9 T £868 £8Z ZT9 I TS:TT Su6T-ZS-t f • 1 MD \' .. • \ \ \ \ \ V ; \ r.......23.t....._-...::. . 77,-•=-. C ■ \ I-- Z W \ • LA, Lai —. • \‘.sk • >-> < I-- ,• 00 c1 S . . MI— 1.- ‘Y:‘• in la. . . \ \ . . a e- I- 14. 0 .61:::::1, C;'71'75- \ . t;: • 0 \ \ \ A1.••• \a_ 4 ci. . . ' 9rOft co . 1 go'. 1-- \ \ 0 z ..3 \ c?",..‘ l.)'.,„L lil M a LLI 4 , in<17,z ‘r \ \ '-.4 sc c, w 0 < >-> \ •\ `‘'' cs\ 1 LrE P. 0 I . 1::,.. \ \. \ 0 1—' \ \ \?;. • i q:/ti. 1 i R \ . 0 se", °Z. v•-■ )/ /1 F. F. \ 4a- \,.•‘ F. 2 Vo" 4,- . \ . \.>) ) 0 0, ' . •••••„, \ \ \*". 0 1 . • \ \1146.• \ fr / A. . \ \ I -- , 1 Agenda Information Memo May 15, 1995 Eagan City Council Meeting B. VARIANCE - RICHARD COSSETTE ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: To approve or deny a variance to allow construction of a 100% color metal clad building adjacent to Mark's Towing building located on part of Lot 6, Block 2, Cedar Industrial Park, in the southwest quarter of Section 17 at 3670 Kennebec Road. FACTS: • City Code prohibits construction of a 100% metal clad building in I-1 districts. • The applicant constructed a metal clad industrial building last year adjacent to the property in question. • The applicant believes there is a hardship because a representative from Lehman's Garage Inc. initially met with Planning staff last November to discuss the procedure for subdividing the subject property. • The City recently considered a similar variance request from Mr. Mark Remick associated with his conditional use permit for a truck and freight terminal on Terminal Drive. In that instance, the City Council did not agree with a variance to the City Code, but did postpone action on the C.U.P.to permit to Mr. Remick time to propose an alternative building exterior design that would meet code. In the interim, his option on the property has expired and he is no longer pursuing this development. BACKGROUND/ATTACHMENTS: (1) Staff Report - pages through //e OJ PLANNING REPORT CITY OF EAGAN REPORT DATE: May 8, 1995 CASE #: 17-V-10-5-95 APPLICANT: Richard Cossette HEARING DATE: May 15, 1995 PROPERTY OWNER Same PREPARED BY: Mike Ridley REQUEST: Variance (to allow a metal building) LOCATION: 3670 Kennebec Road COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: Industrial (IND) ZONING: Light Industrial (LI) SUMMARY OF REQUEST Richard Cossette, owner of Lehman's Garage, Inc. is requesting a Variance to allow the construction of a 100% color metal clad building adjacent to the Mark's Towing building located on part of Lot 6, Block 2, Cedar Industrial Park in the SW 1/4 of Section 17. AUTHORITY FOR REVIEW Section 11.40, Subd. 3, C., states: 1. If the Council shall determine that the special conditions applying to the structures or land in question are peculiar to such property or immediately adjoining property and do not apply generally to other land or structures in the district in which said land is located, and that the granting of the application is necessary for the applicant. 2. That granting of the proposed variance will not be contrary to the intent of this Chapter and the Comprehensive Guide Plan. 3. That granting of such variance will not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate demonstrable hardship or difficulty. BACKGROUND/HISTORY The applicant constructed a metal clad industrial building last year that is now being leased by Mark's Towing. Mr. Cossette is currently in the process (May APC) of subdividing Lot 6, Block 2, Cedar Industrial Park for the purpose of creating an additional buildable lot to construct an identical metal clad building. (, 0 Co Planning Report - Cossette Variance May 15, 1995 Page 2 The City Council adopted an exterior material ordinance on March 7, 1995 that prohibited industrial buildings from being constructed with more than 25%of the exterior being metal. Mr. Cossette submitted a Preliminary Subdivision and building permit application on March 29, 1995. Initial review of the building permit application revealed that a metal clad building was being requested and staff informed the owner of the Architectural Standards Ordinance in effect that prohibits more than 25% of the exterior from being metal. EVALUATION OF REQUEST Mr. Cossette is requesting a variance from the exterior materials ordinance to allow a metal clad building. Mr. Cossette believes there is a hardship because a Lehman's Garage, Inc. representative initially met with City planning staff in November of 1994, to discuss the procedure for subdividing the subject property. The City recently had a similar request. Mark Remick applied for a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) to allow a truck and freight terminal and proposed metal building for a parcel located on Terminal Drive. After the City received Mr. Remick's CUP application, but prior to action being taken, the City Council adopted the Architectural Standard Ordinance regulating exterior materials in the Industrial Zoning District. The City Council postponed action on the CUP to permit Mr. Remick time to propose an alternative building exterior design. His option on the property has since expired and he is no longer pursuing this development. SUMMARY/CONCLUSION Richard Cossette, owner of Lehman's Garage, Inc., has proposed a two lot subdivision (Kenneca Development) which is scheduled for a public hearing at the May 23, 1995 Advisory Planning Commission meeting. Prior to any action on the subdivision, the property owner is requesting City Council approval to construct a metal clad building on the proposed lot located at the corner of Seneca Road and Kennebec Drive. The proposed colored steel sided building will be identical to the Mark's Towing building constructed last year. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED To approve or deny a Variance to allow for the construction of an industrial building with a 100% color metal clad exterior. ( D I ( / I / i I I \ / v.. 1 1 1 1 1 1 O ��ESOjP �`NER I I /4- yy� I c13' �� �y, I ' �� Id' s ' AsN -------- I I 4, 31 5K •RKL\ � I X51• 'Pp •` C T•r L}T'I'o o ' 1�� `p MONTEREY 111 Q piv I G �� i \ \ KYL x � x I 1 I O Rg o . I 0 1HAZEL 19• r`•--_ SLYER BELL I ] I - - __ __ SILVER BELL _, .�, - _ -0_-ct-W ' i !V;..1. '!�J a "' I � et,- -{E:PE wFD , Sp a ` WOODHAVEN : 1 c 4 PARK }'�� .P DAV - ALC50 .4)\4127 F...t. vN- •, "N" � file- . . -41 . . e ` l i AB8R0 iR > �_ i� DEERW000o 0 - K �' . _, ONR 1' i I r a r EY I _ •Iq�„ d/; ) 1 iACONTE TNAL •T•C a • �'. W I WH �� /,� I Za , ; 1.. A * A. SA-- I. lit."�I.A CAR - ARNEUAN a te, I I EMEff4 0 4 J r _ ,=�'�"' PARK 'o I c�� vat a $.7 I nwm r 44B a .. 4, y CEDA 1 1 ' • I ' POND , ad. Y 1 44:,• ZRCON ,L, et. I ..OFFLEY RD. u RK 6 ct '• 6rrJ < CORAL LL�(� 1 _ CT. r�l ' r I n • r I If T � fERRr I I �• '�3'6 a ,• ''. r r y C 7c---1-7---------..,...sfl� i : . R' '� T. • '.►ETCH F FDa'! _� O Y '' • ,I�)z°� I ii rrt )- a Cc AR • • LOo C��0O� . "Dg __ ,_ 05/09/95 09:35 'x'4989951 05-08-169$ 1S:07 Sit 827 0878 X1002/002 LEHMAN'S GARAGE MPLS. P.02 r-Q -i880 14:50 �di'0a'$i 13:43 Itasdish May 14 1995 City of Eagan 3530 Pilot Knob Road Fagan,MN 55122-1597 Re: Vsrianes Request Planning Corwnimien//City Cowl Members: Last year I constructed a contmercial building at 3670 Kennebec Road. This building is a color moat clad building,typical of many other buildings in the immediate ague. This building was located in such a way to aeooromodate a foam land division to crests an Widow!,buildeble lit, I have been involved In the"city required"process to complete bats land division since November 3, 1994. Initial meting with Don McTows(L.alunsn's Garage,Inc.).Jim Swint toad Mike Ridley•to start pecan. The pmlumiasry plat application,with required doeummte,was submitted to this C1ty of Eagan as March 29,1995. I wu informed on Apd16. 1995 that the proposed building was nin in eonfotnwaee with City Code,Chapter 11,Section 11.10,Subdivision 30(25%maximum metal siding allowed). Manzi lad stvtcd this procedure,an ordinance watt created and adapted,which eliminated this type of couurtuotion. All along,it sues our request to build a"duplicate" building es we did last tall. The reason we a e asking for this variance is because we were etpeeaed to have the "Preliminary Plat"requirements met belbre we could apply fora building permit I feel that the City of matt should grant a variance to the applicant who had Mast with the city and were working on the regttksd procedures prior to the city adopting this ordinance(or amending a previous ordinance), Res• - , y . ., 4 I 4� 1 ►� . , ,. ,1 me /.. C)6? ( LEHMAH' S/ Inc. e-° -a AS_ • . ..NI. Serving The Public .4t The Same Location Since 1917 City of Eagan When Lawrence Lehman started his south Minneapolis machine shop in 1917, he probably didn't envision the business growing to the three modern mechanical and collision repair facilities that Lehman's operates today. While Lawrence's sons Fred and Ed operated the business successfully until 1969, it was the involvement of the current owner, Dick Cossette, that brought the leadership position that it enjoys today. In 1969, Dick and a partner purchased the business from the Lehmans. In 1979, Dick bought out his partner and became sole owner of Lehman's Garage, Inc. The original south Minneapolis location (where Fred Lehman, aged 75, still works) has expanded to 16,100 square feet. In 1978, in order to service the volume of business Dick bought out a small shop in Bloomington and used the facilities for overflow from the Minneapolis shop. This is when Lehman's began its practice of estimating and selling in one location and moving the vehicle to another for repairs. When the neighboring buildings became available in 1981, Dick purchased them and moved the Bloomington shop into its current facilities. Initially, part of the space was leased out and part used by Lehman's Equipment, Inc. which sold tow trucks and other equipment. Currently, all 23,000 sq. ft. is dedicated to collision and mechanical repairs. • In 1986, Dick purchased Cedarvale Auto and it's facilities at 1979 Seneca Road in Eagan. This shop has grown steadily and now rivals the Bloomington shop in sales. In 1990, the production area was doubled in size to it's current 15,950 sq. ft. At the same time, a new paint booth, two new prep stations and other equipment were installed. The three locations do represent some special challenges and the shops are linked electronically to automate estimating, sales tracking and production, parts receiving and accounting. Lehman's Garage, Inc. is one corporation with three locations and six profit centers: body and mechanical in each location. Dick manages with a team philosophy. Regular monthly meetings in the Eagan shop's conference room bring the office staff, estimators and customer service people together for training and management discussions. Continual improvement in customer service is sought and this issue is stressed in these meetings. Dick believes that customer service is the key to growth. Lehman's Garage and Dick Cossette are here for the long haul. His business practices demand that all his properties, both buildings and grounds, be maintained and neat appearing. Part of Dick's recent growth has been in the development of the property adjacent to the Eagan shop. Part of this land has been developed with a new steel building just completed in October, 1994 and leased to Mark's Towing. Mark's Towing does towing for the City of Eagan, both private and police towing, using the property for the city impound lot. The current zoning request is due to Dick's desire to develop the balance of the land with a building similar to the one done for Mark's Towing and to lease it out. cerely, -D., ., \ ....._ Donald MacTeague • -"r",-.'" VP of Operations SOUTH MPLS. BLOOMINGTON EAGAN 5431 Lyndale Ave.So. 190 W. 79th St. 1979 Seneca Road Fax: 827-0076 Fax: 888-7229 Fax: 454-4838 Phone: (612) 827.5431 Phone: (612) 888.8700 Phone: (612) 454.1120 0 . 5 N • O Cl - I/\ N</ \ ii aCl / te C / K / •c \ • , F. ii / H- • oe N Z _ , ,c \ Q n- t] a. V N J 1@ / / S \ / a- 5 3 .... . E ' . v : N g z EN \ 4 ff.* . ' ; ,,r hii„ !. i ,,.. .,, ,.:\io,,, / \ :: ,•...„..# •t. / ,) *..ti%, Nts.-. ‘..* f ig 611V 1 •41,:e41.. ,.r I �' ♦ \�I] ` ••V R <1.. • ,' �� x s 10 1 Y F ff. sle. -.... / .., 4 Ai ei C"� Sig Cl 0 N e••;+*7-- / 1 • 4'. X\ • I'd g k,f, it pig ! . 1i51 L.: 6.4"$ . t je a i ,II . .„ , .., ,.•E ■ 111111 ;111C* 1 $ gEi! / . 8 /c., ,_ \ e ,� N F) • • ;41k1 ..ec:)11\ 11.1 1 N / ,-- Cl- it ;Zit ar • \N \'4 0 ) . \ti 1 16 /�,,, �C W Clit r-I . a i 47: • 4, )4i,,..trie / r.c) (7) !; I w c � `� ' .4.;,. �%// it '•• a) a� n yJ ) `•'� 7e...-/;.�, / a 1 iI ii.vo ri En ril ti '4)'4. *Orr' , !zit-. ti / A .4. 4 614 1dr 0 a 14 .5 9 r t s r i ii 14 Rigi \,:s% ;- 1 5 .-1 O c� V 84} .4. . • .,, , . • . , -1- :-1 ! • d i • a s i CV --..(: - o -� i; o • vi j L ` , o cv i 2 ---% ii • , s~ M CO . .r. r 41 C I (' o al • $4 1-i j ; CO O -- -- 1 i J O ; 0" V _ , , o i o a �rn H N 00 .Z 1 i I r7 r i , k t • " ( (1--(3--- ----'-'-}7 . .-, I it .1 r---.. SI . , ... _ . , 4 .... , 1 r , 7 I . ..- .__._.._.., _.._ .1 0 ........- -I H . -i ___________________-..-.1 - ..-..... . ..-...--... 3 __ .„..__ _ ___ . ..._ ... . _ 7 _ ._. ,.. 1.1.) __ __________ ___ .. ._ J__ _____._ crt _.. . ._ __._ . , 4 , 1 , ill , _....,,_ ..1, i.,.....„. . . li':. . . 211 ■■....■ I ...■..■ .■. .. . • • •••■••.... ■.....■■•■... ...... .■....■ ....■..■... . _ • (° I I[. ... ■•■•........= -..-._. ,;_. .• L i:_,:.:414.-:K:4 . . .....„... . . . "1:11 • . . ■ 1 14 11 (1 II il i . V .1 1 X. . . •.._ -4,, ,.. ...„ „ . c..) . < 4; ---a. d __....... 1 • Cr A .• NI' \----- . 1 1 4 \.3.1 . ..cl . i 0 / . 1 d . _._ , 4 , 1 ...,, . ., .7.'. I . - . 1,1C4' '11 • .,... 4..7. • • ... ra I • Agenda Information Memo May 15, 1995 OLD.:BUSINESS A. PEDESTRIAN CROSSWALK STUDY/POLICY ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: Approve/modify the draft pedestrian crosswalk study/policy. FACTS: • In 1993,the Public Works Department initiated a Pedestrian Crosswalk Study which incorporated an inventory, survey of similar communities and review of the Manual On Uniform Traffic Control Devices as it pertains to pedestrian crosswalks. • In 1994 and 1995, this study was expanded to draft a policy establishing criteria to justify the installation of pedestrian crosswalks based on location and the type of crosswalk protection along with a 4-year pedestrian accident analysis, updated inventory, requested installation response procedure and cost estimate for various types of crosswalk protection. • This Pedestrian Crosswalk Study/Policy has been circulated to various City departments for review and comment. It is being presented to the City Council for their review, comments and direction. ISSUES: Many times, the staff receives requests from individuals and/or numerous citizens requesting protected pedestrian crosswalks at various locations throughout the community. In order to maximize the safety and welfare of pedestrians and bicyclists within our community and minimize the City's liability, it would be appropriate to have a policy/guideline to define when, where and to what degree of protection a pedestrian crosswalk should be installed in order to prioritize their installation in accordance with the City's fiscal means. Unwarranted applications can provide a false sense of security for pedestrians and result in a higher percentage of non-compliance by the motoring public due to their unanticipated and/or unnecessary installation. ATTACHMENTS: (1) • A draft copy of the Pedestrian Crosswalk Study/Policy is provided under separate cover. Agenda Information Memo May 15, 1995 B. STOP SIGN REQUEST, WILDERNESS RUN RD e WEDGEWOOD DR ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: 1. Approve/deny the installation of stop signs on Wilderness Run Road @ Wedgewood Drive. 2. If stop sign installation is denied, approve/deny the installation of a pedestrian activated flasher at the existing crosswalk of Wilderness Run Road @ Wedgewood Drive. FACTS: • On September 20, 1994, the City Council received a petition requesting the installation of stop signs on Wilderness Run Road @ Wedgewood Drive. With the petition, the staff submitted the results of the study which indicated that the petitioned stop signs did not meet any of the warrants justifying their installation. Subsequently, the Council was hesitant to authorize this installation. • Discussion then evolved to the option of installing a flashing light at the location of the existing crosswalk in lieu of the requested stop sign. The Council continued consideration of this item until staff could complete the Pedestrian Crosswalk Study which would address the warrant, criteria, and costs for pedestrian crosswalk flashers. • A draft of the Pedestrian Crosswalk Study/Policy was presented and discussed earlier on the agenda. If there are no significant modifications to that policy, the criteria could be applied to this request. • Based on the proposed policy, this location does not meet the warrants to justify upgrading the existing crosswalk with a flashing beacon at an estimated cost of$7,000. • Representatives of the Wedgewood neighborhood have been informed that this item will be considered by the City Council on May 15. ISSUES: • The installation of traffic control devices (stop signs) and/or crosswalk flashing beacons at unwarranted locations and/or prior to the installation of similar devices at other warranted or higher priority locations can expose the City to higher risks/liabilities than would be incurred by not installing/upgrading them at all. ATTACHMENTS: (5) • Cover letter and petition requesting stop sign enclosed on page(?through .Z • Resident's follow-up letter to petition enclosed on pages ��_3 uirou • Staff report evaluating warrants for stop sign enclosed on page (1 through . • Minutes of September 20, 1994 Council meeting enclosed on page • Memo evaluating warrants for crosswalk flashing beacon enclosed on page 130 through 1317-- • /((47 RECEIVED JUN 4 ,993 June 1, 1993 Mr. Michael Foertsch Assistant City Engineer City of Eagan Eagan Municipal Building 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, Minnesota 55122 Dear Mike: I wanted to write to thank you for your attention to my concerns regarding the safety of the crosswalk on Wilderness Run Road which leads from Wedgewood Drive to Walnut Hill Park. As we discussed, many parents in our neighborhood share this concern and are quite anxious to see something done to make this crossing safer. I became an at-home parent last June and since that time, have become increasingly aware of how dangerous it can be crossing Wilderness Run Road. There are advance warning signs for the crosswalk both eastbound and westbound. However, it' s been my observation that many motorists don' t appear to be heeding these warnings, particularly those who are westbound. As we also discussed, there is also a problem with many motorists speeding. With a posted speed of 35 mph, even an additional 5 mph over the posted limit makes crossing Wilderness Run Road much more dangerous, particularly for small children. When considering a 3-way stop at Wedgewood Drive and Wilderness Run Road, I would like you to recall the existing 3-way stop on Wilderness Run Road at Oak Chase Park, just a short distance west of Lexington Avenue. I feel the intersection at Wedgewood Drive and Wilderness Run Road seems an equally important location for a 3-way Stop, particularly given the number of families residing in Wedgewood, immediately across Wilderness Run Road from Walnut Hill Park, who must cross there. Myself, as well as other neighbors, look forward to hearing from you after you have had time to assess the situation. erel y Patti Schilling 4442 Wedgewood Drive Eagan, Minnesota 55123 Home phone: 454-1560 r"( Wedgewood Development Request 'for -wav stop at Wedgewood Drive °& Wilderness Faun Road SIGNAT 'E NAME ?- STRVE ATVRESS X/,( - '. „.7fe•••;(ef• --• "' re • /6 L)- .1 Er..ee4::› '. 1. 54/4';'' 4:::"4,44 .. 7 fr:-: M ) L...(.....,•kL t,; ,valti.tiaja4. iii......,... ' (14i.;I.:. / i,71,:e 1.\--- '') 1 '( t ( • —r. // 74 ,_ , '- ,� , , ��r,..,:.._.l.— ..e.....-_.J.—.---��v--e'er '..L " ---x4/ . . . ; \, C9 lb Wedgewood Development Request for 3-wav stop t Wedgewood Drive- Wilder-ness Run Road SIGNATUF:E NAME STREET ADDRESS C-9-1 LOC a- 1 )e ; d _ I , -7 "1%4, Le0e)e-i4i0oei GA) .17. tO lar.1-60. _/s/.040 Z-4/ erbi 10/7 42/,) Lt..; . ‘0,4_ 14)+,01-gocpci s 4,1/4•2e2a.-4—_ h;-2`79 2ka Ce C&- 619. ,0 ‹ 5 t4.44,it ev-k: a...5- J_G 3 LI ,J . Lckcico • \ LZAcu.ftivS ./0 3 1U/ al2S)gca-tzt, 1C) .17:1 03 -ICA-Lk-2 .1L12Q 1,11eloti.,: cQ Dr . /, '/ j ,7/14 _ A., Wedgewood Development Request or 3-way stop at Wedgewood Drive & Wi1derness Run Road SIGNATURE NAME & STREET ADDRESS 'l i I,. �-.! ; i 5e. -�-i i Pt-e. '- 2 6%D6 Jeco 02. _ l--t•-../ 4= ±6:}1-1.�,(2.b- 1 cC 1v II/ , .f...4 ,y4 N.ectgc:l� 1:1-1 vc_' Acdej /et/6/i ii1,704 .0 C Ai .11. ;11 ill(id NILO" Pr-- D ►ao El►..c c-u,-- _jaitrT --- L01S.__ GotoiLLAdoo4c Lti Al•.VI '4114'c / r-4_ / :- /..,,t20,./..,/ e.%1Ce C/'4/W 1/4211, 1_.z ' A.4. T'U10,6.•� ,isy1Z;LA.sk_., X03 S-- tii 4- , LL614e2_42,,----) JO-y-1 ..,0,0i,2_,..2,-.,..,-■ 4_,,-) ,...._•,, i i / (,ogmfitG F,e&-yr 7 _._'y'''am lg..�.�� 1&11__ai d,iU.1) • K�eey w PETr:Zsotty ■ e-eitru. w• --c c e r t l x--∎ /C. 2-7. Ltl E tSG E iw cam i LAN c J -� � � . Pat-Yt•t:+'c- aVret P. - - 100 ( Gil ec{a5.4,t,dca. Li- l\,)d I 1 t :9.0 sa._71/e.�1.�1 ie c a ‘, E.d am._ccL A.n. _.. rann...c.,...ize9 ,.,4?) 2,244.49.0 _Loc:-.2_t24.20,.N). 0 �. /0 0.4.20,.N y�NV ot_c�:`�c t:io_ 4.0g. s. = - -- - c��L L.T.dcat.s,c;.cscf Lic' quo J 7 &,, 40 6�,..,,Lc_.9 J,44,0-/-i0 PI .. , . 1 WedQewood Development Request +or .?-wav stop at Wedgewood Drive °-: Wilderness Run Road SSIGNATURE NAME °< STREET ADDRESS -Ua+-�- - ----- --- - --- 10, .5 W i,-.-o-cu .^r1/4U--11 t ■'" ''' .% 4:4L___ 1Q322_ _Orlfr5WA /- IN4 i‘J 4/./the.___-_411o43 WEI v.bob u.) • NI , ----,: _ p1 I AcRivotkt&-N ID g3 jt•Aic . tv 4, 111 ...., 2 . i e_____... 1 0 40.. w 6.114,■0 0,0_1 LN) NJ \_;., Ro5I'e kiciss-aaecip Li 1.0_c (41-€4(VaCd. D() - ---R3-6- -S1W.- --11: I'l 450 cifyolp. _LivefoP(. &.' -- - 4 , ____ 4711J_2--- Zej?___ZO*42 --- .r C:fr' -t 'd. on. vl,e.k-6`43 ct.5 ia'` 1 Wedgewood Development Request for 3-way stop • at Wedgewood Drive & Wilderness Run Road SIGNATURE NAME & STREET ADDRESS 4,'t,tg1-C.,Tg 61-f-l.Pt l 4� �.rte 30 3 .1()Lild 1,214inlY • ��--- -- --- August 25, 1Q94 Mr. Tom Hedges, City Administrator City of Eagan Eagan Munic .. pal Building 7,870 Pilot .nob Road Eagan, Minnesota 5512:-1E97 Dear Mr. Hedges: I am writing you in follow-up to my conversation with, Ken Vraa regarding our neighborhood' s desire to appear before the Eagan City Council . ,Our i ssu.e i.A .the.safety., or ,, . `i.ereof, at the crosswalk on Wilderness Run Road and =, ' ' - -Drive adjacent to the Walnut Hill -Park entrance (this s5w l k: is also an exit/entrance for a bike trailway) . With the rapid growth of nearby housing developments, we have seen a significant increase in traffic on Wilderness Run Road. Along with the increased volume of traffic, speeding has also become a problem. The combination of these two factors, as well as the curve immediately east of the park entrance, make crossing into and out of the park very dangerous. In the spring of 1p93 I began relaying our neighborhood' s concerns to the Eagan Engineering Department. I worked with Mike Foertsch who directed a stop sign analysis at the site in the fall of 1593. I have not seen a formal summary of that analysis, but I was told that the intersection did not meet the criteria for a stop sign due to the low traffic volume on Wedgewood Drive. Mr. Foertsch passed our concerns on to the Eagan Parks Department because a study of all city park accesses was underway at that time. Ken Vraa became involved and he recommended pedestrian- activated flashing yellow lights for Wilderness Run Road. The problem now is funding. Mr. Vraa estimated the cost of such a light to be $5i X00 - $10, 000. His concern is that our neighborhood is not alone in experiencing an unsafe park access and he feels that other neighborhoods might make the same request if ours is approved, thereby driving the potential total costs over time toward $100, 000. The consensus in our neighborhood is that if several neighborhoods need engineering attention and financial expenditures to make the Eagan community parks safer, this would be money well spent. If this is such a widespread problem in our community, let' s -fix i t before an Eagan family experiences a serious injury or death: then any amount of money would look like a small amount. 1,a3 We wish to be on the agenda for the Eagan City Council meeting for September CO, 1994. If you need to contact me regarding this matter, please feel free to call me at my home at 454-1560. Thank you very much for your attention to our concerns. S' rely, • ;CS Patti Schilling 4442 Wedgewood Drive Eagan, Minnesota 55123-197.4 home phone: 61 /454-1560 cc: Wedgewood Neighborhood Watch Group • `L MEMO _city of eagan TO: TOM COLBERT, DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS FROM: MIKE FOERTSCH, ASSISTANT CITY ENGINEER DATE: SEPTEMBER 16, 1994 SUBJECT: STOP SIGN PETITION (WEDGEWOOD DR 'rye cc. BD)c_ ; Background Initially, a number of residents in the Wedgewood 1st Addition had requested consideration of the installation of a 3-way stop at the intersection of Wedgewood Drive with Wilderness Run Road. The request from the residents was made early in the Summer of 1993 by a phone call from the resident at 4442 Wedgewood Drive. The resident stated concerns with the ability of residents in the Wedgewood 1st Addition to cross Wilderness Run Drive and utilize Walnut Hill Park located on the north side of Wilderness Run Drive. Following the initial phone contact, a number of pieces of correspondence back and forth between the residents and Ken Vraa and myself were made during the Fall and Winter of 1993 as well as Spring and Summer of 1994. Attached are copies of correspondence for your information. Analysis During the early Fall of 1993, an intersection study was performed analyzing the four following areas: 1. Speed study 2. Intersection sight clearance study 3. An accident analysis 4. Traffic counts A speed study was performed on September 13 and 14, 1993, between the hours of 6:30 a.m. to 8:30 a.m. and 4:00 p.m. to 6:00 p.m. Results of the speed study indicate that with 1,010 vehicles observed at two different times, 619 exceeded the 35 MPH posted speed limit. The highest'recorded speed in this area was 55 MPH. The average speed of the 1,010 vehicles checked was calculated at 36.52 mile per hour. No speeds were checked on vehicles travelling on Wedgewood Drive. • The 85th percentile speed was calculated at 41 MPH. 1 The initial intersection sight clearance study which was performed indicated when a vehicle was stopped on Wedgewood Drive south of Wilderness Run Road, the clear sight distance to the east was 500 feet and the clear sight distance to the west towards Lexington Avenue was greater than 500 feet. In double checking those two dimensions this week, the clear sight distance to the, west towards Lexington Avenue remains as previously stated but the clear sight distance to the east actually is approximately 312 feet versus the 500 feet as originally reported. An accident analysis was performed and results indicated that no reported accidents have occurred within the last two years from the November 16, 1993, original report date. An accident analysis was not performed for the past 12 months. In September of 1993, 48-hour traffic counts were taken at the intersection noted above. The traffic volumes counted reduced to a 24-hour ADT are listed as follows: Wilderness Run Road east of Wedgewood Drive - 1,782 vehicles Wilderness Run Road west of Wedgewood Drive - 1,960 vehicles Wedgewood Drive south of Wilderness Run Road - 178 vehicles In addition to the clear sight distances checked with respect to the stop sign installation requests, additionally clear sight distances were measured for visibility of the existing crosswalk. The entire 41-foot length of the existing crosswalk is visible for a westbound motorist on Wilderness Run Drive approximately 358 feet east of the crosswalk, and eastbound motorists on Wilderness Run Road have clear visibility of the entire crosswalk a distance of approximately 292 feet west of the crosswalk. The crosswalk location is adequately signed on Wilderness Run Drive from the east as well as approaching from the west. Attached is a site plan showing results of the sight distance surveys performed. The Minnesota Manual On Uniform Traffic Devices identifies warrants which must be met before stop sign installation should be performed. They are as follows: 1. Intersection of a less importance with a main road where application of the normal right-of-way rule is unduly hazardous. • 2. Street entering a through highway or street. 3. Unsignalized intersection in a signalized area. 4. Other intersections where a combination of high speed, restricted view and a serious accident record indicates the need for control by a stop sign. The multi-stop installation as requested may be installed if the following conditions are met: 2 PCP 1. Where traffic signals are warranted and urgently needed, the multi-way stop is an interirr: measure that can be installed quickly to control traffic while arrangements are being made for the signal installation. 2. An accident problem as indicated by five or more reported accidents of a type susceptible of correction by a multi-way stop installation in a 12-month period. Such accidents include right and left-turn collisions as well as right-angle collisions. 3. Minimum traffic volume of at least 500 vehicles per hour for any 8 hours of an average day, and the combined vehicular and pedestrian volume from the minor street or highway must average at least 200 units per hour for the same 8 hours in the average day. When the 85th percentile approach speed of the major street traffic exceeds 40 MPH (calculated at 41 MPH), the minimum vehicular volume warrant is 70% of the 500 vehicles previously mentioned. Summary Based on the above information and the intersection analysis performed, the only stop sign installation which is warranted- is the stop condition which currently exists at Wedgewood Drive. The minimum stopping sight distance as required in accordance with the traffic engineering handbook as published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers (225' - 255') is met for the posted speed limit of 35 MPH. Even at the 41 MPH 85th percentile speed as calculated, advanced signage indicating the presence of a crosswalk adequately alerts the motorist of the approaching crosswalk location. If you have any questions or need additional information, please advise. 71 , Assista City Engineer MPF/jj Attachments • • 3 • III ; � , � -- -.. -. , ' �l :4 ' ; ; t / / ZI 61 / , • 1 / ' / 1<% is i1 I III / . ' : /. . • / .. • 026 - II 1 i1� `1 � � • / ' , - • • - � J � li I jil 11 , / / II 1 `i . ••• , ',.. ...• / ' • :- II 1 / . / , f .: ■ • •.'.`'• . _ I 1' �i 1 1 ! • •• • • , , ,/ /•i �•, - • • 1�1 ao 11 1.• /- " . ! .; _ - , 1 '11 c 11 • ... • • /' / ( I / • . -•. .� X11 1 11 to 01 6 —c` amt au •-•r I 111 O _� _4 .1.7,. . i , 1 1 1 , ,.- ..<; a— ,..==p a_ a I 1 tr.1 -u.' \ ‘. r..r .0 k. , 1 1 3 C7) 1' ; ) (1 J �I 11 r% II ( I j. l I ` ► 11z l / .• _ 1 -- ,� / 1 I•■ / /I' / / ;!L/ ,p 1 l 3 / / / / / •- • # 1 • -: -- - _ J = Pi (q ;1 '� / 11 5 1 M /�/ F I/ / , / / - C. r •II I . � ‘ / 0 1 • -f. _ / 1 i a� ►I 1l•F �.1 I`' Ill !ll r 1 yl• /1 ��e //ll / //. • lI if • ' is/i/ I1 \ . .',I/ 1 _ / � �I , 1 l i / /l / , ,l( l Q r 1 . 1 / 1111.1 �Ir 1, i�y, to t , / /, /,' /..,/ r i'_ •,ry • .: m �$•Q �W N 4� 11/////l/�l ,/ , /r. r r/Q N 1: i/l 1 /I 1 I / l '' r '� 1 i�� 'I� I' l I l l 1 1 l 1' o• ' ,I� �, l P� I, I ic.,..7 / 1, 14... \ I/ Nl / , i /, I. 11 1 !, b • EAGAN CITY COUNcn.MINUTES; SEPTEMBER 20, Qi1' PAGE O ..... the Cord to review a use that would be *Opined If It meet#!!f8 conditions. The Council can waive a condition as long as It Is not arbitrary, caprldvij$;m r;vtarQasp fe. Coundmember Wachter stated he wouldltlie':further Information before acting on this. Perhaps a different location on the site would be more appropriate. Hunter added that he would also like to see the Uniform Fire Code sections referenced In the Fire Marshal's memo. Wachter moved, Hunter seconded a motion to continue this to the next meeting. Aye: 5 Nay. 0 PRELIMINARY PLAT BEST BRANDS INC. Mayor Egan introduced this Item it ilmielary;. : f Best Brands, Inc. of one lot on 16.75 acres ;coated along the west side of T.H.:;>F3:aitd t'he rii#ttfi:: a of Yankee Doodle Road. Administrator Hedges noted that the Advisory Planning Commission held a public hearing on this and recommended approval subject to conditions Community Development Director Reichert explained the location and request. She noted they are requesting to combine a planed lot with a metes and bounds parcel. There Is no development proposed at this time. She noted that park dedicatftiA:,,paid on one of the lots at the time It was subdivided. Because the metes and bounds property is'ii ail*.k 5(:subdfvided, It will not be subject to park dedication or water qualtty fees. Wachter moved, Hunter seconded t tion to approve the preliminary plat for Best • Brands, subject to the following conditions: I. The developer must comply wltb:aiaritlard cb'ldftions of plat approval Al,B1, B3, C1, El, Fl, G1 and H1 as adopted by C4iiCiL'•8ction on February 2, 1993. 2. A grading, drainage and erosion control plan must be submitted with the building permit application. 3. The Developer Is responsible,for abandoning all wells and septic systems according to the City and County requiremen s. 4 A sanitary sewer and water main lay* plan aped! be submitted with the building permit application. 5. A tree preservation plan must be submlhed wih: budding permit application. Aye: b Nay: 0 STOP SiG$REQUEST/WILDERNESS RUN41D.i WEDGEWOOD DR. • Mayor Egan Introduced this Item as stop sign regt;iiit , receive petition and approve or deny Installation,Wilderness Run Road&Wedgvwacx :Ktrlv4.:A•dmtNstrator Hedges noted that last year,the City received a petition from adjacent pr operty;:QVriii$:tegitttrip:*,stop sign at this location. A letter was recently received requesting that this item 6e Yeconsid8red'tiy'ttie Council. • Public Works Director Colbert explained the location iiii4iOquest and noted that ifter analysis, staff determined It doesn't meet the warrants for a stop sign. He explained the results of the staff report, and the • s RSTRGAR—ROSCOE-FAUSCH, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS 6c PLANNERS TRANSPORTATION ■ Qvil. ■ STRUCTL'R.�L ■ EN I OMv�vTAL ■ PARI'tc ,SRF No. 0952215 MEMORANDUM TO: Tom Colbert, Director of Public Works City of Eagan FROM: Frank Loetterle, Senior Transportation Planner Jeff Bednar, Senior Traffic Engineering Specialist DATE: April 21, 1995 SUBJECT: CROSSWALK FLASHING BEACON WEDGEWOOD DRIVE AND WILDERNESS RUN ROAD As you requested, we have completed a review of the subject intersection area and a suggestion to install flashing yellow beacons to supplement the marked and signed crosswalk at this intersection. Based on this review the following comments and recommendations are offered for your consideration: 1. Recommended guidelines to install flashing yellow beacons to supplement a standard marked and signed crosswalk indicate these devices are justified when the sight distance to the crosswalk is permanently restricted to less than the safe stopping sight distance, and/or the 85th percentile approach speed exceeds 50 mph. Other special conditions such as a high number of elderly or handicapped persons with crossing desires may also justify these flashing yellow beacons. 2. Based on a study of this intersection by city staff in the fall of 1993 the sight distance is adequate and the 85th percentile approach speed is less than 50 mph. Based on the data from the fall 1993 study, flashing yellow crosswalk beacons are not justified at the subject location. 31 Suite 150, One Carlson Parkway North, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55447-4443 Tom Colbert - 2 - April 21, 1995 3. There are 57 homes in the Wedgewood neighborhood south of Wilderness Run Road and east of Lexington Avenue. Assuming an average of four persons per household, there may be a population in the Wedgwood neighborhood of around 230 persons. Assuming a pedestrian crossing activity rate of 15 percent during the afternoon peak hour (4:30 - 5:30 p.m. typically) there may be as many as 35 persons with a crossing desire during this afternoon peak hour. 4. The highest average daily traffic (ADT) volume on Wilderness Run Road at Wedgewood Drive in September 1993 was 1,960 vehicles. Assuming the afternoon peak hour is 10 percent of the total daily traffic volume, the afternoon peak hour volume is about 200 vehicles. 5. Based on Recommended Guidelines for Establishing Standard (non- school) Marked Pedestrian Crosswalks (see attached guidelines), which SRF developed previously for another municipality, it is found that the subject crossing meets the pedestrian crossing volume threshold and falls just short of the vehicle volume threshold to justify a marked pedestrian crossing (assume a 44 foot wide roadway on Wilderness Run Road). 6. Since the pedestrian crossing volume meets these guidelines and the 1993 vehicle volume was just below the level to satisfy the vehicle volume threshold, it is concluded that the existing marked pedestrian crosswalk is justified. Should you have any questions or comments concerning this review and analysis, please contact us. JRB:bba Attachments 3l RECOMMENDED GUIDELINES FOR ESTABLISHING STANDARD (NON-SCHOOL) MARKED PEDESTRIAN CROSSWALKS Because overuse of marked and signed crosswalks can lead to. driver and pedestrian complacence and actually result in higher pedestrian accident occurrence, it is important to establish marked and signed pedestrian crosswalks only when there is clear justification. Marked crosswalks may be installed at locations where a significant pedestrian/vehicle conflict exists as documented by a traffic engineering study. Crosswalks including pavement markings, signing and road pavem nt messages shall be installed as described in the current Minnesota Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MMUTCD) . Generally, marked pedestrian crosswalks are justified when the average gap in the vehicular flow for any one hour becomes less than the acceptable pedestrian crossing gap for the street width under consideration, and the pedestrian crossing demand exceeds 10 percent of the number of acceptable gaps for the same one hour of the day. The following table lists a typical range of street widths, the associated acceptable crossing gap for that street width, the hourly vehicle volume at which the average gap becomes less than the acceptable gap, and the pedestrian crossing volume that exceeds 10 percent of the acceptable crossing gaps. Acceptable Vehicular Pedestrian Crossing Roadway Crossing Hourly Volume Hourly Volume Width Gap Threshold * Threshold * 28' 11 seconds 328 vehicles/hour 33 pedestrians/hour 32' 12 seconds 300 vehicles/hour 30 pedestrians/hour 36' 13 seconds 277 vehicles/hour 28 pedestrians/hour 40' 14 seconds 257 vehicles/hour 26 pedestrians/hour 44 ' 16 seconds 225 vehicles/hour 23 pedestrians/hour 48' 17 seconds 212 vehicles/hour 22 pedestrians/hour 52' 18 seconds 200 vehicles/hour 20 pedestrians/hour * Note that when both of these volume thresholds are exceeded for any one hour of the day, a marked crosswalk is justified at that location. l Agenda Information Memo May 15, 1995 Eagan City Council Meeting C. COMPREHENSIVE GUIDE PLAN AMENDMENT, LONE OAK AREA ORDINANCE TERMINATING MORATORIUM; REZONING ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: 1. Approval of a Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment changing the land use designation for the area bounded by Lone Oak, Trunk Highway 55, and the Inver Grove Heights city limits from D-11 (Mixed Residential) to RR (Rural Residential) and NB (Neighborhood Business) and adding the Lone Oak Small Area Plan to the land use element. 2. To approve or deny an ordinance to repeal the moratorium on development within the area. 3. To approve or deny a rezoning of approximately 25 acres within the Lone Oak area between Lone Oak and Highway 55 immediately adjacent to Inver Grove Heights from R-4 (Multiple Family Residential) to A (Agricultural). FACTS: • In 1994, the City conducted a land use study to determine the most appropriate long-term land use and zoning for the Lone Oak area. • A moratorium on development was put in effect until May 18, 1995. • On January 17, 1995,the City Council approved the plan amendment subject to approval by the Metropolitan Council and continued action on the rezoning pending approval of the plan amendment. • The Metropolitan Council approved the plan amendment on April 25, 1995. • Final approval of the Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment and the rezoning of the 25 acres is now in order. • The moratorium on development needs to be repealed by an ordinance amending Chapter 11, the City's Zoning Code. �3 ISSUES: • The residents in the affected area are eager to see the plan amendment and rezoning approved and the moratorium terminated. All affected property owners have been notified of this City Council meeting. • Staff has not heard from the owners of the property to be rezoned, but anticipate they will be in attendance at the meeting to express their position. BACKGROUND/ATTACHMENTS: (1) Staff memorandum, page ..9,34, Memo from Metropolitan Council - pa Map of the area to be rezoned - page f?j Resolution amending the Comp. Plan with mps - pages/ 3rthroug (,. Ordinance repealing moratorium - page/ 111(011 MEMO _ city of eagan MEMO TO: Peggy Reichert, Community Development Director FROM: Kristy Marnin, Senior Planner DATE: May 5, 1995 SUBJECT: Lone Oak Area Comp Plan Amendment, Rezoning & Moratorium City Council Agenda - May 15, 1995 Staff requests City Council action on the following items related to the Lone Oak Area, that area of land lying between Lone Oak Road, T.H. 55 and Inver Grove Heights: 1. Approval of a Comprehensive Guide Plan amendment changing the land use designation for the area from D-II (Mixed Residential, 0 to 6 units per acre) to RR (Rural Residential) and NB (Neighborhood Business) and adding the Lone Oak Small Area Plan to the Land Use Element; 2. Approval of a rezoning of approximately 25 acres within the area from R-4 (Multiple Residential) to A (Agricultural); and 3. Approval of an ordinance to repeal the moratorium on development within the area. BACKGROUND In 1994, the City conducted a land use study to determine the most appropriate long-term land use for the Lone Oak Area. An interim ordinance placing a moratorium on development within the area while the study was being conducted was adopted by the City Council on August 2, 1994, effective until May 18, 1995. The conclusions of the land use study led to the need.for: 1) a Comprehensive Guide Plan amendment to change the land use designation and to establish a small area plan, and 2) a rezoning of part of the area (both described above). The Advisory Planning Commission recommended approval of both the plan amendment and rezoning on December 27, 1994. On January 17, 1995, the City Council approved the plan amendment subject to approval by the Metropolitan Council and continued action.on the rezoning pending approval by the Metropolitan Council of the plan amendment. The Metropolitan Council approved the plan amendment on April 25, 1995. A copy of theletter notifying the City of this approval is attached. I )� Peggy Reichert May 5, 1995 Page 2 ACTION REQUESTED Based on the foregoing information, the following action by the City Council is in order at this time: 1. Final adoption of a Comprehensive Guide Plan amendment changing the land use designation for the area from D-II (Mixed Residential, 0 to 6 units per acre) to RR (Rural Residential) and NB (Neighborhood Business) and adding the Lone Oak Small Area Plan to the Land Use Element; 2. Approval of a rezoning of approximately 25 acres within the area from R-4 (Multiple Residential) to A (Agricultural); and 3. Repeal of the moratorium on development within the area. Maps graphically depicting the Comp Plan land use change and rezoning, a resolution for the Comp Plan amendment, and an ordinance for repealing the moratorium are attached. If you have any questions regarding this memo, please advise. attachments Inoak.cc 5(e Metropolitan Council Working for the Region, Planning for the Future IR E t F.•!) APR ; 'r.v; April 25, 1995 Ms. Kristi Marnin City of Eagan RE( Ep fr Municipal Center 3830 Pilot Knob Road APR 2 ? 1995 Eagan MN 55122 RE: City of Eagan Land Use Designation Change From Single Family Residential to Rural Residential--105 Acres Metropolitan Council District 15 Metropolitan Council Referral File No. 15754-8 Dear Ms. Marnin: The Metropolitan Council staff has reviewed the city of Eagan's plan amendment received by th Council on March 9, 1995. The amendment proposes to change the land use designation on 105 acres from single family residential to rural residential. We have determined that the proposed amendment has no potential impact upon any of the metropolitan system plans. Therefore, the city may place the amendment into effect immediately. Because the proposed amendment appears unlikely to affect policies and plans in other chapters of the Metropolitan Development Guide, the Council will waive further review and comment on this amendment. The amendment, explanatory materials supplied and the information submission form will be appended to the city's plan in the Council's files. This concludes the Council's review. Sincerely, --,e1i4 Chuck Ballentlne Director CB:ret - cc: . Kevin Howe, Metropolitan Council District 15 Lynda Voge, Metropolitan Council Staff �-' Richard Thompson, Metropolitan Council Staff 1 3"1 230 East Fifth Street St,Paul,Minnesota 55101-1634 (612) 291-6359 Fax 291-6550 TDD/TTY 291-0904 Metro Info Line 229-3780 An Equal Opportunity Employer REZONING CURRENT ZONING •� r I 1 4\61 I • G SE vo •s�c0 f SW C 414 e- -1' 4k. Qty I J. 7011 ST VI A Q • it I ?ft., R..1 R0 �`�• NE NW s s / Cj G 'r � e' C ►l l 1 i •I�JI ( f ■ 1 6i • SE ` \‘' \gll . '_p= T RQ . • 2: L.+ -+-.r1y ® I PROPOSED ZONING 0 r 4�. �1 x 1,--,-SEN. "4::, •a �op SW C ` / QC 7015 ST. • R0 V NE NMI °r �r� • 7mN �(^ • Rrt �1 p CT. \ GJ O }r \� ''c OV LA c. l n l^^ i i as u M It7 ~ C : i� 1 II 1 4/ 1. S7 "-d.'--.SE _, l L ilYl._S.la IR. 3 •A . - r• ( M . . _ . RESOLUTION NO. 95- A RESOLUTION AMENDING THE EAGAN COMPREHENSIVE GUIDE PLAN WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Eagan is the official governing body of the City of Eagan; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Eagan adopted the Comprehensive Guide Plan on April 19, 1983 , pursuant to the requirements of Minnesota Statutes, Section 473 . 864 ; and WHEREAS, the City conducted a land use study for the Lone Oak Area, that area of land located between Lone Oak Road, Trunk Highway 55 and Inver Grove Heights shown on Exhibit "A" attached hereto, and determined that an Amendment to the Comprehensive Guide Plan was in order; and WHEREAS, a public hearing was held by the Advisory Planning Commission of the City of Eagan on December 27, 1994 at which time the Advisory Planning Commission recommended approval of the Amendment to the Comprehensive Guide Plan; and WHEREAS, on January 17, 1995 the City Council of the City of Eagan approved the Amendment to the Comprehensive Guide Plan on approximately 105 acres changing the land use designation from D-II Mixed Residential (0 to 3 units per acre) to RR Rural Residential (85 acres) and NB Neighborhood Business (20 acres) and adding the Lone Oak Small Area Plan to the Land Use Element, subject to the approval of the Metropolitan Council; and WHEREAS, the Metropolitan Council has determined that the Amendment to the Comprehensive Guide Plan, for the land shown on Exhibit "A" attached hereto has no potential impact upon any of the c �� metropolitan system plans and therefore the City may place the Amendment into effect immediately; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EAGAN, DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA hereby adopts an Amendment to the Comprehensive Guide Plan changing the land use designation of approximately 105 acres of land as shown on Exhibit "A" attached hereto from D-II Mixed Residential (0 to 3 units per acre) to RR Rural Residential (85 . acres) and NB Neighborhood Business (20 acres) and adding the Lone Oak Small Area Plan to the Land Use Element . • THIS RESOLUTION passed this day of , 1995 by the City Council of the City of Eagan, Minnesota. BY: Thomas A. Egan, Mayor ATTEST: E.J. VanOverbeke, City Clerk 4 EXHIBIT A - Z r ` 2 c § I rri Z A rn ri a 1 l C � C y `Y\ 37 izi )/Th4s4 A N° m ,�r T ? R 4 i � • g O J 0 RD'- // • s 0 i (.0) 0 11�/('/far i� Z -r a) _ ' . in o �!� .7 . r 1 csRIT1 k r£ a.DI ? _ _ ___;__ m • O 0 Q pi 1;9„,& - ? a ;r 4°'HEIGHTS : i C7 a N 0 �T11 :■ �:^ Z cp t a) c N w = un - �' o ' 0 mxim ooz z ^ozo M w V ? maxi cm co _iy_. Z 0 s^ 3 0 > rnr- Z2 �rrnx M m0 o ID v w - o° az�v m o = v z 0-aa Z co x Vt r O y r "� w a ■ N s_....;. x..; �7/.'� /1 ;V 1 M YIKC m I • `�ni Irl� V CD (D -y� o' 1 —t, ..... a _. _ `a V N ? v/ A O N " 0) • * �`•DD �, A'i E 0 C nR• .011^1 ,,,' -0. 0 r�s 1,1 i ar" m M fli Tim i - '�.� (O 4:HE/GHTS ‘ ��� Z N co tR �\./ Mil -(4.,( ORDINANCE NO. 2ND SERIES AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EAGAN, MINNESOTA, AMENDING EAGAN CITY CODE CHAPTER ELEVEN, ENTITLED "LAND USE REGULATIONS (ZONING) " BY DELETING SECTION 11 . 04 ENTITLED "INTERIM USE: STUDY AREA" ; AND BY ADOPTING BY REFERENCE EAGAN CITY CODE CHAPTER 1 AND SECTION 11 . 99 . The City Council of the City of Eagan does ordain: Section 1 . EaganiCity Code Chapter 11 is hereby amended by deleting Section 11 . 04, INTERIM USE: STUDY AREA, in its entirety. Section 2 . Eagan City Code Chapter 1 entitled "General Provisions and Definitions Applicable to the entire City Code Including ' Penalty for Violation'" and Section 11 . 99 entitled "Violation a Misdemeanor" are hereby adopted in their entirety by reference as though repeated verbatim. Section 3 . Effective Date. This ordinance shall take effect upon its adoption and publication according to law. ATTEST: CITY OF EAGAN CITY COUNCIL By: E.J. VanOverbeke By: Thomas A. Egan Its : Clerk Its : Mayor Date Ordinance Adopted: Date Ordinance Published in the Legal Newspaper: • Agenda Information Memo May 15, 1995 SIEWIttSISIEgg A. STOP SIGN REOUEST,BEAVER DAM ROAD(7a,N. TIMBERWOLF TR ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve/deny the installation of stop signs on Beaver Dam Road @ N. Timberwolf Trail. FACTS: • On February 18, 1994, the City received a petition representing 15 properties near the subject intersection. In May of that year, a standard stop sign evaluation study was performed by the Engineering Division. The results of that study indicate that none of the warrants identified in the Manual On Uniform Traffic Control Devices(MUTCD)were met. Subsequently, staff could not authorize the installation of the requested stop sign. • Property owners have requested that their petition be forwarded to the City Council for their consideration of authorizing the installation of the requested stop sign. • In April of 1995, staff re-evaluated the intersection sight distances and performed traffic counts and found no substantial change from the earlier analysis. ISSUES: • The installation of stop signs at intersections that are not warranted according to the City adopted Manual On Uniform Traffic Control Devices can create a false sense of security for cross-traffic and pedestrians and introduce an unanticipated traffic control device which will be difficult to obtain full compliance, thereby increasing the City's liability. ATTACHMENTS: • ciqr off stop s evaluation report dated May 31, 1994(updated April 1995) enclosed on pages P }�j P Y ( through l i 4b. • Summary memo from the Engineering Division regarding this analysis enclosed on page Igo • Section from the MUTCD regarding stop sign installation warrants enclosed on pages) (b3. • 3 '411111'11''f4 MEMO _city of eagan TO: MIKE FOERTSCH, ASSISTANT CITY ENGINEER FROM: STAN LEXVOLD, CONSTRUCTION SUPERVISOR DATE: MAY 31, 1994 SUBJECT: STOP SIGN PETITION - BEAVER DAM RD & TIMBERWOLF TRAIL NORTH Attached for Council consideration is a stop sign petition signed by 15 property owners requesting the installation of stop signs on Beaver Dam Road and Timberwolf Trail North. Also attached is a map showing the petitioning property owners in relationship to the above-referenced intersection. In response to this petition, the following issues were investigated to determine if the stop signs are warranted in accordance with the Manual On Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) criteria: 1. An accident analysis was performed and the results were that no accidents have occurred within the last two years. 2. A speed study was performed on May 17 and 18, 1994, between the hours of 6:00 and 8:00 a.m. and 4:00 to 6:00 p.m. Results of the speed study indicate that of the 612 vehicles observed at the two different times, 233 exceeded the 30 MPH posted speed limit. The highest recorded speed was 41 MPH. The average speed of the 612 vehicles checked was calculated at 29.26 MPH. All vehicles checked for speed limit were traveling either north or south on Beaver Dam Road. The 85th percentile speed was calculated at 25 MPH. 3. On May 16 and 17, 1994, 48-hour traffic counts were taken at the intersection of Beaver Dam Road and Timberwolf Trail North. The traffic volumes counted (reduced to 24 ADD for the above-listed intersection and days are as follows: Beaver Dam Road north of Timberwolf Trail North - 1200 vehicles Beaver Dam Road south of Timberwolf Trail North - 864 vehicles Timberwolf Trail west of Beaver Dam Road - 350 vehicles Timberwolf Trail east of Beaver Dam Road - 202 vehicles • 1 4. A visual inspection of the above-referenced intersection was performed to determine the extent of the clear-sight distance. When stopped on Timberwolf Trail east of Beaver Dam Road, the clear-sight distance to the north is 630 feet, and the clear- sight distance to the south is 250 feet. When stopped on Timberwolf Trail west of Beaver Dam Road, the clear-sight distance to the north is 150 feet, and the clear- sight distance to the south is 310 feet. Stop signs presently exist on Timberwolf Trail No., both on the east andwest side of Beaver Dam Road. Also, a 4-way stop sign exists at the intersection of Beaver Dam Road and Bear Path which is located approximately 950 feet south of the above-referenced intersection. If you need any additional information, please advise. J5.(f(21, Construction Supervisor SL/jj • Attachments: Petition Map Showing Petitioning Residents Traffic Counts • Sight Distance Speed Study • 2 I H.5 RECEIVED FEB 18 1994 Er SAM WRSTSNG YOU N 1-IOPE +('HAT + you s ER,IousLY conis.IDEk OUR N EIG 14 gOR HooD S + CoN c EQN Tb SLOtA Dower/ TFC ON jN..� IS 30 r,, P, 1a, sTer. , , eVEQYDA`/ CAPS EXCEED TN-CS SPEED L.� MST Sy AT LEAST 10 Ore AveL MILES PEe woue. 8'f LOOK.fr G AT THIS 1ENcLOSEIb PET.0-.ron1 you CAN SEE SN JuS)" A ONE Nock Ape/9 ALL -f 4e con► cERN E J RESSDEN rS AND ALL 4he CNfDEEN ON TINS ONE QioCK ARIA ALoNt, WE ARE cofVrrcEb -1-H , T sToP SSGN'S ON L O4k AND . Sou-Ati C3oVNb • g E Av£e DAryt RD, WOULD SLOW DoW N AND MACE `T I'1LS A SA (ER AN,b urnEe QOAD, coup you PL EASF RESpONp -To 7 i LETTER ANb PCTrrroN woULD BE EC GREATLY APPeECSATED . v A/vr 7°��,tc � � G vMN,0c/y2 V BEAVF? DArvt EAGt)N, Nt, gri22 GIG- 3123 .••• •• •...✓ 1 A.Y ii 17.'17 P€tition for Stop Sian The undersigned being residence of Eagan in and around the neighborhood of Beaver Dam Road and No. Timbcrwolf Trail would like a stop sign placed on both north and south bound Beaver Darn Road. This would create a four or all way stop at said intersection. Beaver Darn Road Is one of only three Entrances into the neighborhood and is a wide street. The other two Entrances into this neighborhood (Shale laic and Bear Path) have stop signs to slow traffic. Not only is this Intersection a bus stop but there are many children in the area at all times of the day and there have been numerous near miSSES on Beaver Dam. Road. As a result of the construction of Cliff Lake Shopping area and the fact that Beaver Darn Road is a wide street, traffic has Increased and sped up recently. WE deem It necessary to slow the traffic In the area and believe a stop sign at this intersection would do s0. WE feel it is a small price to pay to alleviate the possible harm or death to a child. • I LO N 0 w S4 r h�` }• A � < 1 �Il li 1.., . il N N . • x 13 g rigsfr„14ki . .. ... TIMBER a J`l • �� e • .. ii? j I h i. f (,e44r c•. ;ti' : t:: -a at � • M t / + • r • 9,-..../- • 4 . *1--- -_ ,-fta-,,, ! , • .40.4.4„,, 4000 1 W • -Ai et '''. 400 # ■• .......44070, .4 . . . , „ ,,,0 . , lir .:.:-?:::::::.:.. ' . %>/ ' .:'::i::,:i..r. illillph •J, i •, es �I 'A11 D M � II el .rb .-.4, • it 4iii: • .446 on <NI ..... , $4te . / / # • .. 4. r • r J �� I Jet • 4 414. ir•*44 41 . l a' .tiko. . ' • I -"NM re , 4.jor • Oh • ''' , . ..! a 4 ii r IIP / ,Iitie 10 • • 1* ' I a. • k • . ' ii4 , 44, Lis e litlip . w•cor—ila - • . i . 4,41.... .--N:re. Iv . 7. .4 . :1111) a es . 01. • # r......„ PETITIONING RESIDENTS city of eagan approved: stand#: � -, PUBLIC Petitioning Residents :• Lt WORKS ,q 1 c °� DEPARTMEN u -L, - i t 4 7 N . I/>7 '6:: a 47,1, • 4. Nu.. . • 10 6 • NA ' .r N 0-44.1r. .q' , if . is .:\CL . 91 19 40/44:% B - 6.4044t7. , .1 s ,S . ?:4<.: ss W •r M ` D :114*,./I i•°,1!W.r t • •0 91 r�,/<1� cP . •,�b f N 1"— �� OAF is .i1 ......1-5,-. N,it I: 1 y • •.��w r ∎ el Aor %. itt r �„ 1 �' • •• �i, ;"" • • .- \w :l. . 1 •l� • i ►��t7.°. • ti . • r X —ACV to CD / .4 - .!4 (17 4 a 1 . I/ - ill cz) 4, / • 4.. t V. • • f► 1 111 7 1 4i a 11447 1 i :: '1tk.;4 !ail • A 350 vehicles (24 hr. total) : i' i i B 1200 vehicles (24 hr. total) C 202 vehicles (24 hr. total) D 864 vehicles (24 hr. total) • EXISTING STOP SIGN . city of eagan PUBLIC ' approved: standard Traffic Counts plate 4#: 2 i I ' WORKS DEPARTMENT I ql I • CD . . O. cr M I\ , a • w 11 co II OBSTRUCTED VIEW. P. o • ,9 0 I 3,0, • EX. STOP SIGN TIMBERWOLF TRAI . NCO .0() 4..' — EX. STOP SIGN 111 0 . III o ill 1 city of eagan BEAVER DAM RD. / ` approved: Standard plate # -;:.: PUBLIC TIMBERWOLF TR. N. �{ ��'.. WORKS id_ ' DEPARTMEN SIGHT DISTANCES , , t v ) r • M N N N, R N N A M N q$ sq N ti m m M X to M 11 i n 'I- �° m N IR (1)) CY'l rn N N N Ili Ni `rl V `0 -- ' — - - ,-- 2 � ;: m ' I O no N N IN m NN N � M NN N `\ ' m N I ' SI _ `I ° �n o ken if) __ o. Vl CO N N (NI N rn n i (� N rR IN N N [1! N N� r N a n n' N n N N — N N NO N ` M m M N 1Nl 0 W 3 O M _ ...0 i N M .n is) N N N N N, 'N N N N N M m n -...._ QZ. W NI T --, 1 P. 'f, I i ,3 tr, 4-) , .4. 0 .,.. n NOO H ,� h M � � N n � h N � N �1 I T / 5/ • • • r.._■••._._._.__._1 1 1' I 1.._..7 1 n n I n • NI X n n. • N • • ..... — --• -- —.. . ._ ---••-•-• - - ' =Am MM. ---•1 . _ 01 0 N. , ...._ •••••••• i•••••■•1 •••s•• im.AN..1 w.•••••••• =Pa.. •••••••• ••■•••••••-••••••■1 - Imm■••■ •■•=. ■••■•••• II aaI • O r r II N- •� •_ _ .................. -- — -- (1.) . O • •i W 3 i- 1 i N !I- W • • 1 N kn W _ Q v� a N N N Ni. t n cn h N N ^yl N r'i rig kit W at 11 1.11 ,w —J .— .i 1—' .1�/ •-•-..}.. ..4- L_-.$ .• 4_...•L •.—.Y__Y DTI L J li 3._•_.._ _rJ • a .............._.. • ' r----77.- -1 1 I 1, 1 1 --- - b r , 1 --- 1I t NNN mM Ni N9 m (co Nnl� �`) M N Or O�_ r .•_• •--- -_. __ - . . ___. .. __...._ ___. __. -- . -- 1 _ -._. ---. —_ -- --. —_ - 7 n _ O.. n Q � °, d` � O 'Cr ,9 �' in NMN Nc,) � mnN0\ 'N � Nn � � M >- i i r: - 2 p p15 � . ty, � co � � � N � r k- N cn NN � NnNc� 1� � N N u. '' ' N n N\ M N NI N N NN Kl N o , ,...:,, [ �, —J ....., . : N cN m 0 m Oi ' N N N N M , m N n N N N N N N W Q -, 1 I � , _ Q Q y cN � MN O. tt tg W 1 @ I . [ i J y N nl Ni N N mot- cal in �`n N N n Ni W O W .. // S3 �-----'---'-/ / ----�' � -- | ----'---� ...2 . en »� . ~ . ` 14. '3 ____. N __- __' --. __ ___. _ -_� . a. • ~~ • . _ __ _- w ir. ` / -- __- __' —_'---' - _-_'-_- -__ . __- --- --_-- . �' | | --_ _- -__ -_- ._� '__- __-__� | | ' | | | L- -- _----,------_' '-- _. ' 0 Fis ; ' ~-- 5 } w | _______ _ __ -_____'^� _ ' . ' kJ , ~~J 1 . ' � � n _--___ -_-- __' ---� .-' - _' _ -- __ - _- __. � � - �---�--__ _ / 3 I- ������� ��� A. in . �� � . �� = r~ . . zc.) ----_-7---� Ca 0 ` | • � � �� / - �� - �� �- �� �v �� ~_ �� D. cn W� �� �� m\ `r\ .�v) �� c�) �� �� ^_-�--- F. 5 | / . . ".._ _ _ =_'-/ _ .l_ ■_--Ii :- _9_ I_ 4 .4 __^...._il _ i_ .1 u .4__ .6_ _.1.-^-4 i CS . ' � / - . ' 7-----,. i‘ -., 4io c■I 0 1, ...., 0 ..... 0,. .... ..... --■ N. ...... ss..... . ,.., tr\ tr. w 0 („) Ce% 1.,/ er. or- rn , N et\ 1‘- ts.,.. re) en t•c\ tr.% • .S. 0 4 U., i -- -..— --—. 43 111 /4 kt;4., e.,1 - kl...' ____.• • • N li, ‘.9., •i•-- ■,,, •,--- tr‘ ,..... tr. a. .... ..._ , ..4 ...., ..... ..., al 0 N ix c.. rk csf■ c■I r‘ r1/4 ci tx■ C 4\. 'eg• fn N e. , %1 r•.-, (Nr C*IN r- •., ON X • , I it. t -• 1 (•■•• 1 ' Le .›.. -— — — . ' _ •-.......,......- ---.... lar:> pr"`- 3 tit 4.... ...0 c rt , j... c":4 — . -Z. ri . , ri , le% re■' t-k, r.1 P... rf. ri•N g cl, c.--, rt c'c' 'In 0- is\ 1 ' \ S, 4 I ....0 I 1 I . • , ... Z N, 15 ...._ __. ______ ...... ..._ ___ •..... ...... _II.. (1 [ (.4 (-4- r-• f"") n ' • • iit -1 ___,-,___ __.,_._.r....-....1 0 (IL W 2 0 ' . -.1 . ei ._ __ ___ ... _ _ , , .. .... ; S VI 0.4 NO ka .......... r— r ., fpc, ei tr- o rod, er Ci. 0 N1 C - rk. V‘ r1 rr• (4 et c–' r4N VN \-4 ‘'4N r- c-■ 01 W U% a . 1.- .5- . %. . -•-• — r A \." ‘r, ç' vl it (A cli' 1.1 VI r"-% tt''' c4 rk ct■ rt cr• r1/4 Zq- r.'" c• V\ rt. tr . .-. ;14.•• 1 - i tr- 2 1 0 re■ '....,.. P . • c•-• ...) L ...z..... , _ 1 , _ 11.0 E @ ID @ A. I 1. "Y". ........ ....0 ...9 -- v- 4) 0- 1::$0 Rte r-e A ore: ...r., , ts- \j■ ' Et W V, 1 411 X mil 0 SU f3 1 c i _..,, c . • ' .--- [ ..• [ .3' 1 'IL . •..0-----•-•-----...-.-h — . e -1.---1--• I • icr . . , n ...-- •-- _._ -- .. .._ .__ _ . ---. ._. ._ ._. _ _ __ L_. . ` W 2 L W Z til d. co 1 ZS -_- •—�- ----- .--. — —- --' — i• -- --- -... - F- , 1 rij. 0 - re. M 0 M "Y. r■ „r, is re. N — — r. - --- - -- .—. -- — — --- ( ) . S -•- -- -- - - - - — - -- _ .1. cn (h n 0 C'0 M rv., T M re r'b t;^ c N (-CI rC 4-' f'o re' C'^ t^ Li! i- M a- a- �, Jc 7 O o _ o r^ r6 N (', M rn f`1 f1 r'd in 0 t•P N t~. cn r'l M r rr r" M W: H CO 5 O W v rr, rj- O o" ` a ,M r1 6 0 a.I'm CC I M • I .__ .i-O-L-.1_-_'._- (- 4._-.1 –41.--...•4 .-_ 1�` d- .1__1__.. 1 .-4 - • r L 7 1 I f� 0 a M M !� M (1 r� M NI M1 n el N ( i M n C6 N ~ 4; t•k 15 _ - I - ._�. -- r_ L • w °e N ' N N 1` no * 0 .9 r V .9 .D �. Cr.- N M (∎ MN r{ M M IA r�i cr. cy M (a r"l r1 LA 4 4 Z el N Lt 11 4 °o Li Q- � ^d D`' Q _ rti rt, r, c ('' n M '� M A CY M M Ci N h Pi 3 - - F 0 1/4": ‘ . 2 1 a ■ c)° M 7 s r t- Nl to eo /6 ? f° Iris to . r. N r1 M M ;-> n rn M A c4 Ci r4 c`^ ri rl r ail W W try a- po 0 3) `7- M o- o- 1� C"b - - v � y-. _...__..� I UGC ri s ,' ..- be .,4_._ ---. C=' 0 ct. ^,ea "J"' to 01 --...M rf M n M t(■ rc (-- th rn �` c� 0 -,-*- sr I IA r F i el p, ppW,, '{ 17 _ Cr In .9 — 0•" rt V+ M M t'` rt I` �s� a-- ra M a (b f M (b M M C^ 0 M �f t.,,_ 0 C`l M M (�l f d rn 1 H a • ° X S M J1 '--'--< 1. . s7 L Y Y//M P W g to. Al E d . Ia Al W IIE 1 mp r 0 i , 8 t N L - ------ — - - - F IV i 1 1 • 0 ei v, 4° ri Oo 00 — O f'" ÷.. rn re, o M tp, rb tu 4 (r (6 (Y M 0 Ct r 1"1 C^ r^ M M M X n Cn M cc" F de} • - MI I / „' • CMS W • .a cc :O . o cc ii::.! c • 2 iiI\ cc SITE OBSTRUCTION : z • o . > • N 1, ai Q Li • 1 , SITE OBSTRUCTION I 310, s EX. STOP SIGN 1 ■ X00 • { __ 0 . EX. STOP SIGN P - TIMBERWOLF TRAIL N. 1 ---_„ o [1 . • • , N FUTURE SITE DIST. PROBLEM } I EX. SIDEWALK - - .► • 1 i . .city of eagan • BEAVER DAM ROAD / ! approved: . standard 1.:..k,� PUBLIC* . plate #: (u �l woaKS TIMBERWOLF TRAIL N. �`y► SIGHT DISTANCES J � � DE PARTME 7 . ` �I — — — RI M Woo:+' -. INI64•• 14441 0 + 446A— ',; ' 1 — I 1 M M ' w N 1V' 'y? . , x •.. F • mar I N ♦, ■ 9 2 '� • 1Z / i 'f' ' r N• . • ,l U 1:0:e. 0.4 w .; , ,. f: ... tit . . A.1. :. w le 4e.k<\ e I .6 I i t'. • 4 NC A , . • . , \ 4 % / A cp �o ,� l ' . 6 r‘,, <4\ 105.I t. A. 4z,.. i• , . 0 N 4100 ., s. '. r ' 4 V\ .t\ 4/ '. 4CZ:)‘(" 4C) :..d 4141N J t' 1110°" '4. ,. io of,/,44 \ R 5• ) .: il. ti a, A• gyp' i i As ' iN lia" • A' : 4,. 1•10. '*4 4 4".. I .rw ., /• 4 if 1 ;. • NI "f. •• iii,:111 :.'ill164 .,I1 1! •o �,�, I� •K 1 4 t • ; p '• •V �! \\ r A 111 . A= 368 VEHICLES (24 HOUR TOTAL) B= 1341 VEHICLES (24 HOUR TOTAL) • 1 C= 210 VEHICLES (24 HOUR TOTAL) . D= 852 VEHICLES (24 HOUR TOTAL) • EX. STOP SIGN city of eagan r • approved 'star pP . �plate nda#d l',. r PUBLIC TRA U • (i� ' WORKS a .sDEPARTMENT" h� ■ � • li '11I�1'I�IY',I'�''�hllh� ,r Iii I i..r'f ill MEMO _city of eagan TO: TOM COLBERT, DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS FROM: MIKE FOERTSCH,ASSISTANT CITY ENGINEER DATE: MAY 9, 1995 SUBJECT: STOP SIGN PETITION - BEAVER DAM ROAD &TIMBERWOLF TRAIL NORTH The above-referenced intersection has been under review and studied by the Engineering Division for approximately 15-16 months. The initial request for a stop sign installation was received on February 18, 1994. Subsequent to the receipt of the petition, on February 23, 1994, you had sent correspondence to the lead petitioner stating the request would be analyzed the following Spring. In May of 1994, staff conducted an accident analysis, speed study, traffic counts, and a visual inspection of the above-referenced intersection to determine the extent of the clear sight distances. After the May 1994 analysis,the file does not indicate any activity after that date, until April 1995 when the property owners contacted us again. In April of 1995, the information referenced in the May 31, 1994, memo was verified with the exception of a speed study. Staff did not perform an additional speed study in April of 1995. The Minnesota Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices identifies specific criteria for the placement of stop signs under Section 2b-5. Section 2b-6 identifies conditions which may warrant the installation of a multi-way stop sign as requested by this petition. (Sections attached for your reference.) Currently, there are stop signs stopping North Timberwolf Trail both eastbound and westbound at its intersection with Beaver Dam Road. This stop sign installation on North Timberwolf Trail is in accordance with Section 2b-5 of the MMUTCD. Multi-way stop sign cr' ria as identified under Section 2b-6 are not satisfied at this location. A is an City Engineer MPF/jj I 3. At intersections on a divided highway where the median between the 61 0 X roadways is more than 30 feet wide. At such intersections, a STOP sign II-37(c) may be used at the entrance to the first roadway of the divided highway Rev.5 .. and a YIELD sign may be placed at the entrance to the second roadway. 4. Where there is a separate or channelized right-turn lane, without an adequate acceleration lane. it 5. At any intersection where a special problem exists and where an it engineering study indicates the problem to be susceptible to correction by .4 use of the YIELD sign. A XYIELD signs generally should not be placed to control the major flow of traffic at an intersection. However, YIELD signs may be installed to '` control a major traffic movement where a majority of drivers in that II-37(c) Rev.5 y. movement are making right turns (see page 2A-16). At such an intersection, YIELD signs should not be erected on more than one _'•• approach. .. YIELD signs should not be used on the through roadways of �w expressways. They may be used on an entering roadway without an J...:,, adequate acceleration lane, but in a well-designed interchange, the sign •,>. would interfere with the free merging movement, and it should not be used under those circumstances. • - 2B-9 Location of Stop Sign and Yield Sign )111 A STOP sign should be erected at the point where the vehicle is to stop or as near thereto as possible, and may be supplemented with a Stop line • �, m and/or the word STOP on the pavement, as shown in figure 2-2 (page fr 2A-15). A YIELD sign should be erected in the same manner, at the point :_z -7-, • where the vehicle is to stop if necessary to yield the right-of-way. Where t.:',..‘ there is a marked crosswalk on the pavement, the sign should be erected approximately 4 feet in advance of the crosswalk line nearest to , approaching traffic. • Where only one sign, STOP or YIELD, is used, it shall be on the right- rn:�4 hand side of the traffic lane to which it applies. An intersection where a wide throat exists on the signed approach, observance of the sign may be ,` .• improved by the erection of an additional sign on the left side of the .,, approach road, and by the use of a Stop line. Where two lanes of traffic are subject to the STOP sign, a second sign should be placed where it is . E visible to traffic in the inner lane. At certain channelized intersections, the . . , : additional sign may be effectively placed on a channelizing island. In no n instance shall one STOP or YIELD sign be mounted above-another on the II-37(c) c' 'S Rev.5 1:=f=:.;s, • same posts. .=:r` Where two roads intersect at an acute angle, the STOP or YIELD sign !s . t,_ & should be positioned at an angle, or shielded, so that the message is out of view of traffic to which it does not apply. . NF 2B-5 i■ .,.,, 1, LO 2----- .., In the event the visibility of a STOP sign or a YIELD sign at any location is restricted, the sign shall be located as specified, and a Stop Ahead sign (sec. 2C-15) or a• Yield Ahead sign (sec. 2C-16) shall be erected in advance of the STOP or YIELD sign. I Figures 2-2, 2-7a, 2-7b, and 2-7c (pages 2A-10 and 2D-16 to 2D-18) I show typical STOP and YIELD sign installations. 2B-10 Speed Limit Sign (R2-1) The Speed Limit sign p shalI display the limit established by law, or by regulation, after an engineering and traffic investigation has been made in accordance with established traffic engineering practices. The speed limits shown shall be in multiples of 5 miles per hour. In order to determine the proper numerical value for a speed zone on the basis of an engineering and traffic investigation the following fac- tors should be considered: 1. Road surface characteristics, shoulder condition,grade,alignment and sight distance. 2. The 85-percentile speed and pace speed. • 3. Roadside development and culture, and roadside friction. • 4. Safe speed for curves or hazardous locations within the zone. 5. Parking practices and pedestrian activity. 6. Reported accident experience for a recent 12-month period. Two types of speed limit signs may be used: One to designate passen- ger car speeds including any nighttime information or minimum speed k} , limit that might apply,and the other to show any special speed limits for • buses and trucks. No more than three speed limits should be displayed on any one speed limit sign or assembly. Where a special speed limit . applies to trucks or other vehicles, the legend TRUCKS 40, or such ' ; • similar message as is appropriate, shall be shown below the standard , 44 4 i 1 41 SPEED t A • LIMIT TRUCKS : 5 0 4 0 R2-1 R2-2 24"x 30" 24"x 24" 2B-6 ;,! _ • I Agenda Information Memo May 15, 1995 Eagan City Council Meeting B. COMMERCIAL LAND USE PLAN AMENDMENT - CENTRAL AREA PLAN ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: To approve or deny an amendment to the Commercial Land Use Plan of the Comprehensive Guide Plan including a description, goals, land use plan, and policies for guiding development within the Central Area subject to Metropolitan Council review and approval. FACTS: • The City has been studying its commercial development plan and the Central Area, in particular, since late-1993. This plan amendment reflects the work of the City's Planning Commission, Economic Development Commission, Central Area Task Force, and City Council. • The Advisory Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on this plan amendment on April 6, 1995. Discussion at this hearing centered on the Commission's desire for adding specificity regarding the City's intended development for the Central area while insuring that the design concept for the northeast quadrant depicted graphically in the plan is intended as an example only, not a definite design. • At its meeting of April 25, 1995, the Commission reviewed a revised plan amendment reflecting its previous discussions and took action to recommend its approval to the City Council. ISSUES: • Both Opus Corporation and James Brehl, Attorney for the O'Neils, have submitted letters indicating concerns with the plan amendment. Staff believes that Opus' suggestions #1 and #3 are adequately handled in the plan draft. Staff does not believe that suggestions #2 and#4 are consistent with the clear City Council policy and intent desired for this plan amendment. The Community Development Director also met with Mr. Brehl to discuss his concerns further. He may be providing further correspondence prior to the Council meeting. • On Wednesday, May 9, 1995, City staff was contacted by an attorney representing Joe Miller Homes who indicated he was looking into the Central Area Plan Amendment on behalf of his client. We have no further specifics on their concerns. _ _ _ I �X (-1 BACKGROUND/ATTACHMENTS: (5) Staff memorandum - page (G4-/(ci Commercial Land Use Plan: Central Area Plan Amendment - pages(Wthrough`7( Letter from Opus Corporation - a /77 Letter from Jim Brell - page / (iiyrV . �f/ APC minutes of April 6, 1995 and April 25, 1995 - pages G a( through (-r • 7 4101rP MEMO — city of eagan MEMO TO: Peggy Reichert, Community Development Director FROM: , Kristy Marnin, Senior Planner „PL,vv "-_• DATE: May 8, 1995 SUBJECT: Commercial Land Use Plan Amendment: Central Area Plan City Council Agenda - May 15, 1995 Staff requests City Council action on an amendment to the Commercial Land Use Plan of the Comprehensive Guide Plan which establishes the Central Area, including a description, goals, land use plan and policies for guiding development within the Central Area. The Central Area encompasses land in the four quadrants centered on the Yankee Doodle Road/I-35E intersection. This amendment will supersede those portions of the current Commercial Land Use Plan related to this defined area. BACKGROUND The City has been studying commercial development and land use since late 1993. Several studies and visioning activities have been completed to date, which lead to the production of the Central Area Plan. The Advisory Planning Commission (APC) held a public hearing on the plan amendment for the Central Area Plan on April 6, 1995. Discussion at this hearing centered on the Commission's desire for added specificity regarding the City's intended development for the Central Area while ensuring that the design concept for the Northeast Quadrant, depicted graphically in the Plan, is intended as an example only, not a definite design. The Commission closed the public hearing and continued action on the amendment to the April 25, 1995 meeting, directing staff to revise the Central Area Plan in accordance with their discussion. Staff completed the requested revisions, and the APC recommended approval of the plan amendment at the April 25 meeting. Two comment letters were received regarding the Central Area Plan, one from Opus Corporation and one from James Brehl, the attorney for the O'Neils. The Opus letter indicates objections to the following: 1) use of Figure 3 in the plan; 2) policy 3.a. which states "Long, single strips of commercial uses should be avoided."; 3) requirement for a full service hotel; and 4) requirement for concurrent development of the Main Street Peggy Reichert May 8, 1995 Page 2 component. The Brehl letter objects to the plan amendment on the grounds that it ". . . . imposes requirements and restrictions upon the Northeast Quadrant property,which are not imposed upon other property located in the City or in the central area."One of the issues raised in the comment letters, that of the full service hotel requirement, has been addressed in that the policy was revised prior to APC action to state that development of a hotel is supported, not required, by the City. It is staff's opinion, however, that it would be difficult to fully satisfy the other issues raised in the comment letters without somewhat diluting the work and direction of the APC and Central Area Task Force. Copies of the Central Area Plan and the comment letters are attached. ACTION REQUESTED The Council is requested to approve, subject to Metropolitan Council review and approval, a Comprehensive Guide Plan amendment to the Commercial Land Use Plan which establishes the Central Area, including a description, goals, land use plan and policies for guiding development within the Central Area. Because this Plan amendment involves the establishment of a new land use category encompassing a fairly large area, staff anticipates that the Met Council will initiate a 90 day review. Upon review and approval by the Metropolitan Council, the amendment will be returned to the City Council for final adoption. attachments centarea.cc (0 EAGAN COMPREHENSIVE GUIDE PLAN COMMERCIAL LAND USE PLAN AMENDMENT: CENTRAL AREA PLAN APRIL 25, 1995 COMMERCIAL LAND USE PLAN: CENTRAL AREA PLAN • LOCATION The majority of the southeast and southwest quadrants of the Central Area is fully developed Eagan's Central Area includes the four quadrants with the desired mix of uses. Both the northeast centered on the Yankee Doodle Road/I-35E and northwest quadrants have vacant land intersection. The general boundaries of this available for development. The northeast district are shown in Figure 1. quadrant contains the largest contiguous tracts of vacant land, at approximately 180 acres, which GENERAL DESCRIPTION presents the prime development opportunity in the Central Area. As such, while this plan This land use category encompasses the provides policies for guiding development in the concentrated massing of mixed retail, office, entire Central Area, the opportunity exists to service and residential uses that serves as the provide additional details for guiding development City's Central Area. Uses within the Central Area in the northeast quadrant. node should serve the shopping needs of the POLICIES sub-region, the community at large, and adjacent neighborhoods, as well as providing a significant corporate office employment base. Medium-and CENTRAL AREA OVERALL high-density residential uses, with proper site planning, fit within this mixed use node. Because 1. The City will encourage, through zoning and of its role as Eagan's central business area, infrastructure investments,the development of development of a public space or spaces for one Central Area node to concentrate and community gatherings is essential. create a massing of mixed-use activity. Th four quadrants centered on the Yankee Transportation access requirements will be high Doodle Road and I-35E intersection is the for the Central Area given its scale and draw from appropriate location for this Central Area the community and sub-region. An internal categorization. transportation circulation network is a key component to the area for the efficient movement 2. Dense mixed-use development with a of vehicles both internal and external to the area. complete range of retail, office, service, Transit access and a pedestrian circulation medium/high-density residential and public system will also be needed to assist with the space, will be promoted in the Central Area movement of people, not just vehicles, to, from through proactive zoning, performance and within the Central Area. standards and design guidelines. Comprehensive site planning of the Central Area 3. Development and redevelopment in the will be required not only to ensure appropriate Central Area should accommodate and transitions between the different land use types, provide access to a roadway network but also to provide a uniform appearance to the consistent with the adopted roadway system area. plan in the Transportation Plan Element of the Comprehensive Guide Plan. Figure 2 denotes the general land uses, such as large-scale or small-scale office, retail, high- 4. To foster a unified identity for the area, density residential, etc., located within the Central development and redevelopment, including Area. buildings, signage and lighting, within the Central Area should be compatible with the 4/25/95 1 (La COMMERCIAL LAND USE PLAN: CENTRAL AREA PLAN land use plan and design guidelines Central Area, the City is establishing a specific established for the area. set of goals and land use plan for this quadrant to be used in guiding its development. 5. To further establish an identity for the area, the transportation network, including roads, Goals trails and sidewalks, in and around- the Central Area should be designed with special The Northeast Quadrant should be an integrated treatments such as landscaping, lighting and multi-use neighborhood incorporating a variety of other architectural features that express a activities such as living, shopping, dining, unified theme throughout the four quadrants. socializing and recreating. This area should be This unified design theme for the developed at an appropriate scale and mass with transportation network applies to both public special architectural treatments that will identify it and private roads, trails and sidewalks. and set it apart from the typical suburban development. It should be developed as a 6. Development within the area should be significant landmark and community focal point, designed to foster safe and convenient a place where people could live, work, shop and bicycle and pedestrian movement among the recreate. While auto access and parking are quadrants by providing a sidewalk and trail necessary, the Northeast Quadrant should be a network, and access to this network, linking place where one can park the car and walk to a the four quadrants of the Central Area. variety of shopping and recreation opportunities. 7. Development within the Central Area should accommodate transit as an integrated Land Use Plan component of the area by providing an access network compatible with transit The land use plan for the Northeast Quadrant passengers and vehicles. represents the merging of several different land uses, including a commercial component, a small 8. Parking in the Central Area should be scale "Main Street" with small shops, a central carefully planned and managed to ensure an public park and a moderate-density residential adequate and efficient supply. neighborhood. These separate land uses could be arranged in a variety of ways. a. An over-abundance of surface parking - areas will be discouraged through the All four components are equally important to the promotion of shared parking among the establishment of a community focal point, or various components within the area. sense of place, for the Northeast Quadrant of the Central Area. a. Large parking areas should be divided up to lessen their visual impact through the The commercial component may consist of a use of landscaped islands, pedestrian retail shopping area, offices, sit down restaurants walkways or other similar techniques. and a hotel. While the retail stores may be large single uses as dictated by the 1990's retail NORTHEAST QUADRANT market, building layout and architectural design should minimize the"big box"visual effect. Large Recognizing that the Northeast Quadrant parking lots potentially necessary to serve the presents a prime development opportunity for the tenants of this commercial area should be broken up using a variety of techniques, such as 4/25/95 2 COMMERCIAL LAND USE PLAN: CENTRAL AREA PLAN landscaped islands and pedestrian walkways. uses are seamed together by a boulevard extending northward into the quadrant from Integrated with or adjacent to the commercial Yankee Doodle Road through a "Main Street" component, the "Main Street" component could shops area up to the east-west parallel collector consist of smaller commercial shops on one or road. This street could be designed as a formal possibly both sides of a north-south boulevard grand boulevard lined with trees and landscaping, through the quadrant. The character of this trailways, special lighting, and benches. The boulevard in the area of the small shops would public park component is located along the entire be that of a traditional main street, with on-street length of the east side of this boulevard, with the parking and sidewalks with decorative lighting residential component located immediately east of and street furniture to identify and encourage use the park and extending along the entire northern of the area as a "people place". boundary of the Northeast Quadrant. The commercial component is located on the western A 12-to 20-acre central public park component of side of the quadrant. the Northeast Quadrant would ideally be located on the site to take full advantage of the prime Other arrangements may also be appropriate natural features—the woods and ponds on the provided the proper balance and relationship eastern part of the quadrant. Trails should be between the key elements is achieved. designed to traverse not only the park but also to connect this park to other areas of the quadrant POLICIES and the overall Central Area. The public park area should first include a formal park area, or NORTHEAST QUADRANT "Village Green", where concerts, fairs, and celebrations could occur. At some future date, 1. Any development within the Northeast other features that could be included in the public Quadrant should be planned as a whole and park area are an indoor-outdoor playground and incorporate a mix of uses including a community center. The idea is to first establish commercial, "Main Street", public park and the public park area, begin to use the site for residential components. public activities, and then develop desired capital facilities over time. a. Buildings, roads, trails, signage and lighting should be consistent with a The residential component would consist of a design theme established for the area. variety of medium- to high-density housing unit types in the range of six or more units per acre. 2. Each of the four components—commercial, It should be designed to function as its own "Main Street", public, residential—should be neighborhood, yet be integrated with the other developed at a scale and intensity that allows land uses within the quadrant. each component to exist on its own yet in compatibility with the other uses. One possible example of this land use concept is depicted graphically in Figure 3. This example, 3. Uses within the commercial component that provided for illustrative purposes only,shows how are consistent with the vision include retail, all four of the key elements—commercial, "Main office, hotel and restaurants. Street"small shops,public, and residential—could be arranged to provide the proper balance and a. "Big box"retailers that may be developed appropriate relationships between the differing in the commercial component in land uses. In this example, the different land 4/25/95 3 • COMMERCIAL LAND USE PLAN: CENTRAL AREA PLAN response to market trends should be should be compatible with the design of designed to minimize their visual impact. the commercial, "Main Street" and public Long, single strips of commercial uses park components. should be avoided. b. The residential component should b. The City supports development of a provide pedestrian connections to the hotel. commercial, "Main Street" and public park components. 4. Development of the "Main Street" retaiVservice component is essential to the IMPLEMENTATION Northeast Quadrant. This Main Street commercial should be developed prior to or Implementation of this Commercial Land Use concurrently with any large scale Plan involves the following: development in the commercial component. 1. Transportation Plan amendment 5. Development of public space or spaces for community gatherings within the area is an The Transportation Plan Element of the essential element of the Central Area. Comprehensive Guide Plan will be amended to Design of the Northeast Quadrant should incorporate the Yankee Doodle Corridor therefore preserve options for a public park improvements. component. 2. Quadrant Evaluation a. A single 12- to 20-acre site should be preserved for a public park in the The remaining three quadrants—northwest, Northeast Quadrant. southeast, southwest—will be evaluated and additional details for guiding development and a. The first element established in the redevelopment in these quadrants will be public park component should be a formulated, as needed. formal open space or"Village Green"for programming outdoor community events. 3. Design Guidelines b. The public park component should be Design guidelines and a maintenance plan for located to take advantage of the prime streets, lighting, walkways, signage, landscaping natural features of the site and should be and architectural treatments will be developed of sufficient size and dimension to and applied to development proposals within the accommodate public buildings and Central Area. outdoor public gatherings. 4. Intra-area Trail/Road Network 6. The City supports lifecycle and affordable housing opportunities in the Northeast A trail and roadway network plan will be identified Quadrant by encouraging a variety of housing to encourage pedestrian, bicycle and automobile types, in terms of both price range and unit movement among the four quadrants of the type. Acceptable housing densities would be Central Area. in the six or more units per acre range. 5. Funding Strategy a. The design of the residential component 4/25/95 4 '--7 COMMERCIAL LAND USE PLAN: CENTRAL AREA PLAN A short- and long-range funding strategy will be developed for the public improvements and facilities envisioned for the Central Area. 6. Organization of Central Area Business Community Organization of the business community for cooperative activities beneficial to the success of the Central Area will be facilitated. 4/25/95 5 /7 3 FIGURE 1 CENTRAL AREA • • ' o ., ; t gi a uevIEw L J ED CEDAR D. OWEZV R0. - v ui .40 Ti'.. RD. a /1r- t• :!QUARRY '.7". t ..r 1.0 (4/ 6 1 6 60 4MCON x i _i . uRDY PA ,��. -1 1 1 r _ c 51TE DRIVE z Z A :Yr A • Y 78 QUARRY c x, PARK w• • NORWESTu 1 • —7P L ANKE= DOODLE ROAD YANKS DOODLE "-MAO i 5L•••j ;I� n T \�1st I I YANKED ?! \r•••••.31.. ((Di A HEIGHT- w '' �z <� p, , . /. ,„. i , ..,.10Y At. '/ ' L LILf D G \N/• RKI ig !it , 4 x. . 7 • _(.1...... . oucxwooD C I A --�CT. _ -y, i ..T. / Eli J al- c3ES T REGE ;0-561.04;o orl 4 . =7, C. �a aKE � I "`� H G 1 - '�" ',FU(Cl4'/1,c = yp►•`�: o Ur "-"� Cr) .a 1 y✓ C , � g r(7:741‘.0t0 I� a0 N� z i ^ �a " y 1, c..���� V i ,.7 ��� I f C—� Fc'�� KoL5T.1Dt' J Q VE CT. ;AL C-1----7-4A Y1 —1 L,KN,kVK RII: E DIG.RT L,41A�c 611 (- , . \■ LMARK ! ^ L�" ^y � I �\ `" PARK o�RK/ .0.. = 1 Y BLKHWK\ �\ N V� ` CT. / '" _* < I "(RMS..- W i' II \ C,. MARK \\ 1. _ i c . D 0 1 v. a`Ua Wk l{ Si O y \ `� OaD / 7 / . FIGURE 2 CENTRAL AREA LAND USES O <� E.__:1.. %7 Q \,� \ /// CLU6VIEV a owERV ^' ' ''''7; ."1. i/ 1 'a' T. RD. 1—�I �'k�v / a • • •MARRY I y- \_g c j ,,h c,!.i 3a:.• 3 9 `MOONr .:. I •< I -.Y PA /1:-.41 will • I , • . (•:) I r■ ..: ue. X01 c „viz owes T • MAJOR OFFICE • m ; n ♦ ., 3 v Rr.? c) , MAJOR RETAIL/SERVICE/OFFICE : �4Q` RESIDENTIAL(MED/HI) 8 QUARRY o �.� . PUBLIC SPACE • . ' PARK °' ' C�`�y4 ) . i ,1.... K) 0 • ANKEE 70CDLL ROAD II / YANKEE DOODLE ROAD •i a �=-1 . ! SMALL SCALE'• . 0' \ J/ �R. I �oWti I 1 n ° . ... ;R• RETAIL//) I �'-� \\ „ 1 ! \\sr �` `c r F+eCHT �SERVICE/OFFICE `;" OFFICE/RETAIL/RESDNTL(MED/HI)7R. • " , si 0' !EARY PARK 1 , , .z.;:7fcc v0Qu > / /MAJOR RETAIL/SERVICE ! • IC '' 1 - 6 ,rN y / ARM�� 3 lu• I OUC(WOn Z 3 �� 3p/ yi000 R.• IOL�T I 4; 7 a ZG t] . � r C :;�— : y, 0 i 1 • 7 C''._ )1. O U-CCWOOD '% e 1! is +c TA a b 1�,i JCER8 30SSO cC 1 , 1 v a I mod.. �� /I j c�� /" r:c K�STao,I }COVENC. FAICC�NA''1 . "- ��\1puotk/K Rpm aIGL_RT i LA WE 61) I J �}�^,� \�wAK , ROAO FISH LA j"�' OE'�awRK • :�. W 8l<HV c I i \3RAUN c:I PARK 0ar'IAR1'v 'C". _. / L G r-- C <R I W i i C- .TR , RK �\ i - I � ;Ix i I �•� �• ate., ORE. 0 R , ...�TR. .... l l T 2t'0 , V a J . Wk 11 ►?fr; 1 i,,,1\ C4 iu p. , ,\f �O II • / 7 OZ z 1-- i_ . _ _...t _E..t %� '� .gal.. _ 1?r;iD j r..,;(3.. ,o .....,, ii:,.::;) i r............. _ 'f +r 1�• • • • ...i eri rf, I► ii . ...virM __. ` ( 2 z r ... .._,_..: : i.'.• , . .v. ..._. ___� ,:I 11 1d11N3CIIS3a A g ,....:5,. , - .I r r fll . V f• • _• rp r^ i t -' 4 • C ..•!, y _ ! •` r• f. �1'^�s,r � '� �.a ,(`9-�-:�. ..--.•s �\,•_ .4.. .!'rte.' ' a �■ s' -i7y. ..••••::7:-.1..4-1: C:iidl ,..11�z ..r,, -,:;..',,e11.1-311 .t-- r-:-.- `r '• - ~'.Y=�k t;',..•;!:,_. �i.?.•as r• w ' LIB % : '•a BIZ -fl: .;_• L._ .1 _' �� cn— a�d U AIb: • .En 011 `� } 1. ;. I '�/ III Li -4 �.` U• 0 • �� - �•.- - `�tir.:�\.• I - e...+ ° tin. n� ! �'`"`' i""' J :~a•�.�.'` yi ,� :.a��/� ' 'Y�=i'- 1 iL_CSC �. '''‘''';'1,13 I��� +-\`�==_ H• a • s . ..\.-•.�. .w. I I"'"t�,;' } 1`.C, ` *��k tii _• (1 `/ I i pm. , i i _ r• CD - . *'"`-." -• '''....'.•-...1'''..-.7,'',..,-.:*:-.•,•1"-''.). k\,._'47.).i.1:.:.. ......H":::::. VS,. ...........,H1 . I,'1'„.,,..../ ..2i:,,..... S.-, 1.,,\VO.Ari! id .1;7'1:" 4;2 .1...4. Li. ''' 'IT:. ! :' . I . ''- r-• 'f z� -mow- _4 'F: "�°ii ' •-•••• �.• •I .� -mss,.'ti_ - rx„:re l' -y .t, • .• �,"'_ i^1 ,. ,,, .-.■_y -.._•--.,r .. `o�—,3�'' ; ^i_ ..7II. tt , -•-•.-.•:-.- s.\�...Jr:: '1,_;ate r C?iy^'�:t 4 :1 .-L' `_ • �•:'■ ►.; • i t`` r ..- 44 J , T r•'•.: 1 /i%V , — `�•'r .' I .. ... 0•• f' ., --_•• _ •,,,..„• '. IIIII �:1,1 .5..1.,1•411.%;:,:t.......,•;:'_f ,-��.IL_ ': LL, Z .:-O- ' 1J ! • I . � ' �'1 'LI _,� ,�,ti `• .4.'.. , c.1.1 '/ " :r°• •� � '''t I •r` F • ' ' i " 0.' N• � IT T ' \'.. 0 ' . i ;l :�\ ' • ., - - - A., ,•.y 1 . , ) ---1 , MJus cap:nation OPUS II(ll1 t llxir.(.m1Pr ,4� J9110 0rt n Noltl cast Maxon N.tr)rno P0.Oas ISII Minotonee.M nnovuo i+W 43.9r4r) Mp ow:ria IC.Mirx}ar su bhti40t11m! 012.934 4444 f ex AI)•Hafr4h/'1 April 25. 1995 Ms.Peggy Reichert City of Hagan 3.191 Coachman Point Eagan,MN 55122 Dear Peggy: As you are aware, Opus Corporation has submitted a Development Proposal for the northeast quadrant of Interstate 35E and Yankee Doodle Road. Therefore,in this context we have reviewed the proposed modifications to the Comprehensive Guide Plan for this part of the City. In general, we feel the Comprehensive finn should ontnhlinh generalized objectives for this cite,not specific • site plan layouts or detailed design standards. in addition,we feel the comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment being presented to the Planning Commission on April 25th is more appropriate than that previously submitted to the Planning Commission. However, we do have some specific comments which we would like to make in light of the Development Application for our Eagan Promenade project which is now under review by City Staff. 'These r0Tririam*t , fellinu,o 1. We request that any reference to Figure 3 be deleted. We feel that the policies and implementation"; guidelines are adequate to direct development and that any reference to a specific site plan unduly limits the flexibility and workability for approaching site development on the property. 2. We request that policy 3"b" be amended to delete the sentence "Long,single strips of commercial nses should be avoided." Instead we would recommend the following language, "Architectural elements and landscaping should be included in ordcr to meet this objective." 3, While•we•understand•the•Cityy's•strontq desire.for.development.of a.full.service.hotci.as. part of the central area, it is important that the. City also understand that market conditions will not be favorable for the foreseeable future. 4, Opus objects to the inclusion of objective number 4 to the extent that It requires concurrent development of the Main Street commercial component. We would recommend that the language be modified to Indicate that the Main Street commercial should be developed as market conditions warrant if any reference to timing must be Included at all. It seems unusual that the Comprehensive Plan should be utilized in directing the timing of specific land use components. We appreciate your consideration of our comments. Sincerely, OPUS CORPORATION Michele Costar Timothy W. urnnne Senior Director Vice President Real Estate Development Real Lastate Development MF/bb Oro t;nrnoreeonis anettiintnoItin Onus group nlcomrwa —Archilnts,C ntrAllnntflarnloMrs CI now C.alumbus.(.nitis fasnan Mhvsbn Mirsxmlxtl,0,Llndo.Aswauda IlsarnncSruttir Imps MAEN&SIMON,PLC LAWRENCE J.HAYES. SAINT PAUL OFFICE J.PATRICK BRINKMAN a JEROME B.SIMON RICHARD C.SALMEN JOHN C.JOHANNESON 2300 WORLD TRADE CENTER JOHN J.BOWDEN JAMES W.BREW.... 30 EAST 7TH STREET PHILIP T.COLTON BRUCE G.ODLAUG RUTH SILSETH MARCOTT ALBERT A.WOOOWARD SAINT PAUL,MINNESOTA 55101-4904 TREVOR R.WALSTEN GARRETT E.MULROONEY• TELEPHONE 612-229-2900 JOHN R.LANOIS WILLIAM J.MASSING" TELECOPIER 612-229-2800 MARK R.GLEEMAN JAMES A.GALLAGHER STEPHEN E.YOCH CHARLES BANS JENNIFER A,TENENBAUM BARRY A.GERSICK MINNEAPOLIS OFFICE JEANNE GLADER KILOOW GEOFFREY P.JARPE" DANIEL S.SIMON RICHARD M.GAALSWYK 2900 NORWEST CENTER LARRY B.GUTHRIE 90 SOUTH SEVENTH STREET SETH M.COLTON MINNEAPOLIS,MINNESOTA 55402-4133 OF COUNSEL HAROLD LEVANOER.JR. TELEPHONE 612-338-1113 JOSEPH N.NEMO.JR. TELECOPIER 612-338-2271 RETIRED ALSO ADMITTED IN WISCONSIN MERLYN C.GREEN REPLY TO: JOSEPH A.MAUN St . Paul 1909-1991 April 24, 1995 Mark S. Miller, Chair, and Members of the Advisory Planning Commission City of Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55122-1897 Re: Comprehensive Guide Plan Proposed Amendments for the Central Area; O'Neil Property at the Northeast Corner of 35E and Yankee Doodle Road Dear Mr. Miller and Members of the Planning Commission: We are attorneys for Robert J. O'Neil and the Estate of Grace M. O'Neil, owners of 120 acres at the Northeast corner of 35E and Yankee Doodle Road. As you are aware, Opus Corporation holds an option for the purchase of the O'Neil property and has submitted a proposal for development of that property. , Through some happenstance, the O'Neils, Opus Corporation, and we were not aware of the proposed Comprehensive Plan amendments until subsequent to the Planning Commission meeting of April 6 . We • will appreciate the City adding our firm (with designation to the attention of James W. Brehl) to any mailing list of interested persons with respect to matters affecting property in the Yankee Doodle corridor. We have received today a copy of your proposed amended "Commercial Land Use Plan: Central Area Plan" . We understand that it is the intention of the Planning Commission to receive written comments, but no oral comments or testimony, at the Planning Commission hearing scheduled for Tuesday evening, April 25 , 1995 . PROVIDING OVER 30 YC1R QF E L SERVICES MAUN&SIMON,PLC Mark S . Miller, Chair, and Members of the Advisory Planning Commission April 24 , 1995 Page 2 The option agreement with Opus Corporation in part has been a result of the desire of the O'Neils to present a developer capable of an integrated development of the entire O'Neil property. No developer presently is known to the O'Neils more qualified than Opus Corporation. We remain hopeful that Opus Corporation can be successful in presenting and obtaining approval for a development plan which is both economically feasible and appealing to the City and the public. However, as owners of the largest part of the "Northeast Quadrant" property referred to in the proposed amendments, the O'Neils object to the proposed amendments to the Comprehensive Plan. The amended Central Area Plan imposes requirements and restrictions upon the Northeast Quadrant property, which are not imposed upon other property located in the City or in the central area. The amendments subject the O'Neil property to requirements for a "Main Street, " public park, trails, "special" lighting, and other features or restrictions which are of a design nature. Requirements are made for "Village Green, " "Formal Open Space" and other public park and public building features . Nothing comparable is thrust upon any other property in the City. Opus Corporation and the City have discussed specific plans for development of the O'Neil property. In connection with that and the review of the Opus proposals, certain possible design features likely have been discussed. The transfer of particular design features to the Comprehensive Plan and the imposition of those design features upon the Northeast Quadrant as Comprehensive Plan' requirements is inappropriate, questionable planning methodology, and unfair burdens upon the O'Neil property that no other property faces . We are hopeful that the Opus Corporation proposals will meet with City approval on an economically feasible basis and with appealing features . If that does not occur, the O'Neils will be forced to another program for division and sale of its property, in which case the proposed Comprehensive Plan amendments will be particularly unfair and unworkable . The Comprehensive Plan amendments certainly are not in keeping with the court orders which issued in the resolution of prior disputes . In furtherance of the Opus Corporation efforts to work matters out with the City for its development, the O' Neil family has /1 /77 MAUN&SIMON,PLC Mark S . Miller, Chair, and Members of the Advisory Planning Commission April 24 , 1995 Page 3 • stepped back from continued discussions with the City. In view of their significance, we are prepared to discuss the Comprehensive Plan provisions with the City and its staff' at any time. In doing so, we assure the City and Opus Corporation that we will avoid interference with advancement of the Opus Corporation specific development proposals . We will be in attendance at the City Council meeting on May 2 , at which we understand the Comprehensive Plan amendments will be presented. We look forward to a call from the Planning Commission or the City staff if discussions in advance of that time may be productive . Very truly yours, i 1;,1 ; L ` / J,,1 1 James W. Breh,Y JWB :ea�� cc : :46eggy A. Reichert Robert J. O'Neil, Jr. Michael J. O'Neil Maureen G. O'Neil 4/24/95,JWB,67580 1S S • /10 Page 5 April 25, 1995 ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION COMPREHENSIVE GUIDE PLAN AMENDMENT CENTRAL AREA PLAN Chairperson Miller opened the next item of the evening regarding a Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment revising the Commercial Land Use Plan to incorporate the Central Area Plan which contains the policies for guiding development in Eagan's Central Area located in the four quadrants centered on the Yankee Doodle Road and I-35E intersection. Senior Planner Marnin introduced this item. Ms. Marvin noted that this item was before the Advisory Planning Commission at its April 6, 1995, meeting during which the Commission requested revisions to the Land Use Plan. Ms. Marnin noted the revisions to the Central Area Plan. Member Wallace stated that he still found reference to Exhibit 3 problematic that developers will use Exhibit 3 as a verbatim policy of the City as opposed to simply a conceptual or sample development design. Chairperson Miller noted that the plan specifically states that Exhibit 3 is an example in addition to the words "example only" on Exhibit 3. Member Isberg noted that the Opus Corporation requested that any reference to Exhibit 3 within the plan be deleted to which Member Heyl noted that the Task Force members specifically disagreed with Opus' suggested development of the subject property. Senior Planner Marnin stated that the text of the plan and the illustration of Exhibit 3 must be taken together and not read separately. Member Segal moved, Heyl seconded a motion to recommend approval of a Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment revising the Commercial Land Use Plan to incorporate the Central Area Plan which contains the policies for guiding development in Eagan's Central Area located in the four quadrants centered on the Yankee Doodle Road and I-35E intersection. All approved in favor. Page 6 April 6. 1995 ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION COMPREHENSIVE GUIDE PLAN AMENDMENT CENTRAL AREA PLAN Chairperson Miller opened the next public hearing of the evening regarding a Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment revising the Commercial Land Use Plan to incorporate the Central Area Plan which contains the policies for guiding development in Eagan's Central Area located in the four quadrants centered on the Yankee Doodle Road and I-35E intersection. Senior Planner Marnin introduced this item. Ms. Marnin highlighted the information presented in her March 30, 1995, memorandum to the Advisory Planning Commission. Ms. Marnin noted the background and history of the Land Use Study. She noted that two general conclusions have been reached: (1) the Commercial Land Use Plan needs to be updated to clarify the City's vision for the commercial development into the future; and (2) a central community vocal point with concentration of mixed uses is a desired goal of the City. Ms. Marnin further highlighted the Commercial Land Use Plan Amendment creating the Central Area Plan. She outlined the Plan's general description, policies, specifically the northeast quadrant vision statement design concept polices and implementation. Charles Bartholdi, a representative of Federal Land Company, inquired with the City staff for specific details of the Plan. First, he inquired as to whether there is a specific road improvement proposed for the Town Centre area consisting of Denmark Avenue and Town Centre Drive. Community Development Director Reichert stated that that issue will be dealt with in the next item regarding the Transportation Plan. Mr. Bartholdi further inquired as to'whether there is any proposed zoning changes with the Central Area Land Use Plan. Ms. Reichert stated that the Central Area Land Use Plan goes with the existing zoning and that the Plan is a designation, not zoning change. In response to Mr. Bartholdi's inquiry as to the procedure, Ms. Reichert advised that if the Plan is approved, it then goes to the Metropolitan Council for approval which must be completed within 90 days. Finally Mr. Bartholdi inquired as to whether there should be consideration of the square footage under the existing Plan to which Mr. Reichert stated that it would not be affected. Ms. Marnin added that any new development will follow the policies as working policies until the City Council and the Metropolitan Council officially approve the Plan. Jim Ostenson, the owner of the 56 acres to the very north of the subject property, adjacent to the post office, expressed concern that the Land Use Plan has no detail as to what is desired or required under the Land Use Plan. Mr. Ostenson recognized that it does call for mixed use, including multiple residential, but the Plan is unclear as to what type of multiple residential and what type of architectural standards are required. Ms. Page 7 April 6, 1995 ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION Marvin stated that the Plan's implementation policies will define the standards and the purpose is to have design continuity, and not necessarily be identical. Member Wallace stated that he concurs with Mr. Ostenson's concerns, noting that Figure 3 may be inferred as the Plan's requirements and not as a concept plan or layout. Ms. Marvin advised that Figure 3 depicts the design concept for the proposed northeast quadrant and the term "elements" on page 2 of the proposed Central Area Plan is defined as the proposed design/development components, i.e. retail power center, small scale traditional mainstreet, central park and moderate density residential housing, which are intended by the Plan to be used or required in any development. Discussion ensued among the Commission members that the term "elements" or the Plan itself be revised to be more specific as to the design or development requirements of the Plan. Member Segal suggested that the term "power center" be deleted from the Plan because it does not necessarily have to be a retail use. Member Heyl explained that the Task Force used the term "power center" to mean the development's focal point and the Task Force envisioned that the power center would include a hotel, first-class restaurant and/or office. Member Segal inquired with the members of the audience as to whether the owner of property in the northeast quadrant was present. There was no acknowledgment from the audience that the owner was present. The Commission members concurred that the Central Area Plan needs to be revised to incorporate more specificity as to the City's intended and desired development for the Central Area. Member Heyl noted that the Task Force's main concerns was that: (1) the developer may want high density, which the Task Force did not desire; and (2) that a developer may propose a typical "high power 1990 strip mall" whereas the Task Force desires a higher class, unique shopping area. Heyl concluded that the Task Force's consideration and concerns must be conveyed in the Central Area Land Use Plan. Member Segal further suggested that in paragraph 1 of the northeast quadrant policies on page 3 of the Central Area Plan be revised to read: "[d]development within the northeast quadrant should be generally consistent with the elements identified in the design concept shown in Figure 3." Member Heyl noted that the addition of the term "generally" would not change the intent of the Task Force. Segal further suggested that paragraph 2 of the northeast quadrant implementation objectives on page 3 of the Central Area Plan should be revised to state that the Planned Development Agreement "should be" amended, rather than "will be" amended. Member Burdorf suggested that Figure 2 be revised to incorporate a required percentage amount of each intended.or proposed use in each quadrant. Member Miller disagreed, reasoning that a percentage of each use would not allow flexibility in determining the exact uses in the future. Page 8 April 6, 1995 ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION Discussion among Commission members again focused on the intended use of Figure 3 of the Plan. Member Burdorf expressed concern that developers may use Figure 3 as a policy statement which may not be consistent with Figure 2. Member Wallace noted that paragraph 2 of the northeast quadrant implementation provisions require development pursuant to the vision and design concept which refer back to Figure 3 and therefore the developer will use Figure 3 as a development standard. Member Isberg suggested that the Central Area Plan explicitly provide that Figure 3 is an example or concept plan, not a definite design. Member Heyl moved, Wallace seconded, a motion to close the public hearing. All approved in favor. Member Hey!moved, Isberg seconded, a motion to continue this item to the April 25, 1995, Advisory Planning Commission meeting in order to allow City staff time to revise the Central Area Plan for more specificity. All approved in favor. • MEMO ` —city of eagan MEMO TO: Chair Miller and Advisory Planning Commission Members FROM: Kristy Mamin, Senior Planner....) L. DATE: April 20, 1995 SUBJECT: .APC Meeting April 25, 1995 Old Business Item B - Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment: Central Area Plan SUMMARY OF REQUEST The Commercial Land Use Plan of the Comprehensive Guide Plan is being amended to incorporate the framework for guiding development in the Central Area, which includes the four quadrants centered on the Yankee Doodle Road/I-35E intersection. This amendment will supersede those portions of the current Commercial Land Use Plan related to this defined area. BACKGROUND/HISTORY The Advisory Planning Commission held a public hearing on the requested Comprehensive Guide Plan amendment on April 6, 1995. Discussion at this hearing centered on the Commission's desire for added specificity regarding the City's intended development for the Central Area while ensuring that the design concept for the Northeast Quadrant, depicted graphically in the Plan, is intended as an example, not a definite design. Upon closing the public hearing, the Commission directed staff to revise the Central Area Plan in accordance with their discussion. SUMMARY/CONCLUSIONS The Central Area Plan has been revised to incorporate the comments received at the April 6, 1995 public hearing. Specifically, the text description of the design concept for the Northeast Quadrant has been revised to describe each of the four desired components--commercial, "Main Street", residential and public—in more general terms to encompass a variety of allowed uses. The previous description was taken from the Central Area Task Force Final Report, which described specifically the design concept that was developed during its deliberations. For example, previously the commercial element was described in terms of a "retail power center". The revised plan indicates that the commercial component can include several types of commercial uses, such as retail, Planning Report - Central Area Plan Meeting Date - April 25, 1995 Page 2 office and/or hotel uses. In addition, the residential component description was expanded on to specifically state that medium- to high-density residential uses means 6 or more units per acre. Language has also been added to make it clear that Figure 3 in the Central Area Plan is only an example, intended for illustrative purposes only, of how the • key land uses in the Northeast Quadrant could potentially be arranged. The policies for both the overall Central Area and the Northeast Quadrant have also been expanded on to specify the intent for a unified design theme among all land use components and facilities (buildings, roads, trails, sidewalks, signage, lighting, landscaping, etc.) in the area, to emphasize the need for balance among all four land use components, to specifically state (rather than imply) the importance of the "Main Street" retail and a hotel site, to describe the intended phasing of public park development, and to specify the intended density range for the residential component. A copy of the revised amendment document is attached to this memo. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED To recommend approval or denial of a Comprehensive Guide Plan amendment to the Commercial Land Use Plan which establishes the Central Area, including a description, goals, land use plan and policies. .x • • - Agenda Information Memo May 15, 1995 Eagan City Council Meeting C. TRANSPORTATION PLAN AMENDMENT - YANKEE DOODLE CORRIDOR ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: To approve or deny an amendment to the City's Transportation Plan which focuses on the Central Area of Eagan. FACTS: • This amendment to the City's Transportation Plan incorporates proposed system improvements to the Central Area/Yankee Doodle Road Corridor. • This plan amendment is the result of a transportation study initiated by the City Council in 1993 to examine the short and long-range transportation system improvements needed to support development of the entire Yankee Doodle Road Corridor. • This amendment will require Metropolitan Council review before fmal approval is authorized. • The Advisory Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on this amendment at its meeting of April 6, 1995 and recommends its approval. • ISSUES: • Adoption of this plan will clarify the City's long-range transportation plans for the Central Area. It will also indicate the roadway improvements that are necessary as development proceeds;however, adoption of this plan does not commit the City to the provision of any specific improvements envisioned in this plan nor tie the City to any specific time line for these improvements. The overall system improvements will be constructed incrementally as necessary to accommodate existing and future development. Each individual project will require a public hearing and specific authorization by the City Council prior to construction. BACKGROUND/ATTACHMENTS: (3) /17. April 6, 1995 APC minutes, page 9 through Staff memorandum - page (1t()-- g/ Transportation Plan Amendment - page Ap.througlab 1. ( 7 7 i__ , Page 9 April 6, 1995 ' ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION COMPREHENSIVE GUIDE PLAN AMENDMENT TRANSPORTATION PLAN Chairperson Miller opened the next public hearing of the evening regarding a Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment revising the Transportation Plan to incorporate proposed transportation improvements for the Central Area/Yankee Doodle Road Corridor. Senior Planner Marnin introduced this item. Ms. Marnin highlighted the information presented in her March 30, 1995, memorandum to the Advisory Planning Commission. Ms. Marvin noted the background and history of the Transportation Plan, a summary of the improvements under the Transportation Plan and the rationale thereof. Ms. Marnin also briefly outlined the information in the proposed Transportation Plan Amendment. Ms. Marvin noted that funding for the proposed improvements have two sources: (1) Minnesota Department of Transportation and Dakota County funding; and (2) City funding, which includes street funds, assessments and City-wide levies. Charles Bartholdi, a representative of Federal Land Company, inquired as to whether the City had any plans to widen Yankee Doodle Road further east than as it is depicted in Figure 3 of the Transportation Plan. Ms. Marvin advised that it is not known at this time whether Yankee Doodle Road will be widened further east but that there is a possibility that the widening may occur as far as Lexington Avenue. Mr. Bartholdi further inquired as to whether there is any proposed changes to any road changes within the Town Centre development, especially Denmark Avenue and Town Centre Drive. Ms. Marnin advised that the proposed Transportation Plan does not identify any changes to Denmark Avenue or Town Centre Drive and presently there is no planned road improvements. Community Development Director Reichert added that Figure 3, depicting proposed transportation system improvements, is only a general concept plan. In response to Mr. Bartholdi's inquiry, Ms. Reichert advised that the Transportation Plan is subject to Metropolitan Council review and approval. Further, Ms. Reichert advised that the proposed transportation system improvements is without any timeline and is conditioned on the area's development. In response to Mr. Bartholdi's inquiry, Ms. Reichert advised that the total proposed Transportation System Plan will cost $11-$12 million. Ms. Reichert further advised that approximately $8 million will be funded through City funding if other agencies assist in funding, one-third of which would be funded through assessments. Member Isberg inquired as to whether the proposed Duckwood Drive bridge in the southwest area would cause more interior traffic on Denmark Avenue. In response to Member Isberg's inquiry, Ferrol Robinson, the City's traffic consultant, stated that he test Page 10 April 6, 1995 ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION traveled the two alternative routes via Yankee Doodle Road and then via Blackhawk Lake Drive. Mr. Robinson stated that there was only a one-half mile difference between the two routes and the Blackhawk Lake route is more convoluted; thus there will be no incentive to use the proposed Duckwood route as a short cut. Member Wallace inquired as to whether the limited widening of Yankee Doodle Road would cause delays where it merges back to two lanes. Public Works Director Colbert responded that the concentration of traffic drop off is a consideration as to where to remove a third lane. Mr. Colbert added, however, that there is additional right-of-way area to expand to a third lane if needed in the future. Member Segal moved, Wallace seconded, to close the public hearing. All approved in favor. Member Segal moved, Hey! seconded, a motion to recommend approval of the Transportation Plan. All approved in favor. MEMO _. city of eagan MEMO TO: Peggy Reichert, Community Development Director FROM: Kristy Marnin, Senior Planner DATE: May 8, 1995 SUBJECT: Transportation Plan Amendment: Central Area/Yankee Doodle Road Corridor City Council Agenda - May 15, 1995 • Staff requests City Council action on an amendment to the Transportation Plan of the Comprehensive Guide Plan to incorporate proposed transportation system improvements to the Central Area/Yankee Doodle Road Corridor. This amendment will be included with the Transportation Plan Element as a supplement. BACKGROUND The City's consultant performed a transportation study analyzing the impacts of existing, proposed and potential future development on the transportation system around the .Yankee Doodle/I-35E area of Eagan. The impetus for this study involved several factors, including the current level of congestion, the large amount of vacant land in the area with development proposals on the horizon, and a traffic generation cap over development of the O'Neil property in effect until a traffic study is completed. This study concluded that transportation system improvements are needed not only to support additional development in the area but also to alleviate congestion problems currently occurring. In order to implement the identified improvements, an amendment to the Transportation Plan incorporating the improvements was prepared. The Advisory Planning Commission (APC) held a public hearing on the amendment on April 6, 1995. Comments made were primarily questions about the length of Yankee Doodle Road that would be widened, what improvements(if any)were proposed for Town Centre Drive and Denmark Avenue, the projected cost of the improvements, and interior traffic on Blackhawk Lake Drive. After closing the public hearing, the APC recommended approval of the transportation plan amendment. No written comments have been received. A copy of the plan amendment is attached. Peggy Reichert May 8, 1995 Page 2 ACTION REQUESTED The Council is requested to approve, subject to Metropolitan Council review and approval, • a Comprehensive Guide Plan amendment to the Transportation Plan which incorporates proposed transportation system improvements to the Central Area/Yankee Doodle Road Corridor. Although the roadway improvements proposed with this plan amendment maintain the integrity of the metropolitan transportation system--consistent with Metropolitan Council policies--staff anticipates that the Met Council will institute a 90 day review because it is an amendment to a Plan Element involving a rather extensive set of improvements. Upon review and approval by the Metropolitan Council, the amendment will be returned to the City Council for final adoption. attachment • tranplan.cc ) 7( City of Eagan Transportation Plan Amendment CITY OF EAGAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN AMENDMENT Public Hearing Draft April 6, 1995 PREPARED BY: SRF STRGAR ROSCOE-FAUSCH,INC CONSULTING ENGINEERS Sc PLANNERS 71111141 eaAlOx■=11.■snmQTMAG■arnotoleatGisELOING • Saito 150. O .Ceram Parkway Meth 14 inneapolia, JS:mma! 55447 612/475-0010 . FAX 612/4752429 • 3/28/95 //q ;■ City of Eagan Transportation Plan Amendment TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION 1 Scope of the Amendment 1 Purpose 3 2. TRANSPORTATION PLAN ELEMENT 5 Rationale for Proposed Changes 6 3. FUNCTIONAL CLASSIFICATION 9 4. IMPLEMENTATION 11 5. TRANSIT PLAN 12 Transit Planning 12 Current Service and Ridership 13 Future Service Plans 14 LIST OF TABLES Table 1 Proposed System Modifications 8 Table 2 City of Eagan Functional Classification (Arterials) 11 Table 3 MVTA Existing Transit Service 13 3/28/95 City of Eagan Transportation Plan Am ndment 1. INTRODUCTION The City of Eagan's Transportation Plan is part of a larger planning document called the Comprehensive Plan. The City's original Comprehensive Plan was prepared under the 1976 Metropolitan Land Planning Act. This original document has been amended or added to since its original development. The original plan is often referred to as the "1980" plan. This document is an amendment to the transportation section of the Plan. Scope of the Amendment This amendment is to the transportation section of the City's Comprehensive Plan. The amendment is not considered as a major revision of the Eagan's Transportation Plan; rather it is an update to the existing plan. While some of the transportation revisions cover the entire City, the focus of this amendment is the area known as the Central Area. One of the problems that the City of Eagan has faced is the development of an adequate transportation system The City of.Eagan began its development relatively late in comparison to other suburban areas. This was due primarily to delays in the completion of 1-494 and 1-35E. Once these facilities were completed, rapid growth occurred from 1980 to 1990. The population more than doubled in this period. By the year 2020, Eagan is expected to have a population of 71,000. In addition, Dakota County has been the fastest growing metro area. This growth has placed continued burdens on the State, County, and City transportation systems (Figure 1). The proposed transportation system changes are needed to support the growth associated with this area of the city to the year 2015. This is consistent with the goals established in the City's 1990 Transportation Plan. • To develop a safe and convenient transportation system in order to provide Eagan's citizens access within the City and to other portions of the Metropolitan Area. 1 3/28/95 _ • S I City of Eagan i I f`"' ' 1 1 w a ......... 1`l• ht t � _ o 9 _ _ - 1 7 ...--..-7-, r_ •v _- + .�,1�.,/�.a- } WASHINGTON -:, ti' '1 C. 1 - _ j--- �• -- ��---- ' - _• — I A ` 7 �_ �=fir•,_• — .M1,-.-(_ �� ••`t? 11` , i ~ .,•! ,.77‘0111111ktek: .•1 , 1 _ A' M _ ----/. .. kill _ .,...exairi : , ! _...; 1 )•+ _ .. . -: 1 .. . „:, „.) 9 -1, .,..- - .„ --____ _ __ zlmwattiMil 1 i ' , i. I ,. • )..........1 • 'OIL'S.. I Cam. k v -.;..- :. :.. I _ g il::7 r w y r�'+`3•f:fir. 4. ? _- - : ���.- .i`= 4tyr =-�.•.:: tl tiwr.. I r_ Y„I o7�v '}' .� ''y •+;. r 1� ' 7 11� 1y.© ,, • y��w y i1_I.-.�..\..1� rte./ ., �•. It-. �.pto[ • - _94:::::::::•:::::::.::::: • ,.r...u s , ] I %::3) — .4 .-• , . 11—=---".... .y.. ' .:+1 ---'...• c, : 9 : , 0 ..,,. i , , ■ ,, . c_ _ .... ........,. , ., ..... , ._........_ ....... ,,_., , ,z.,, ..,.. ,..„ ....____., ..., , ,:. s......: ".: 0 , .„. I ..4: `-‘1(gliiiill° . : .,;:::.• it. LL .w.. _ I .1,...... _ - j I I I F - . L_ ._~ ' • •• 1 SRFSTRGAR-ROSCOE-FAUSCH,INC Y OF EAGAN FIGURE CONSULTING ENGINEERS&PL NNERS CAT10N MAP sRF NO.0931937 TRANSPORTATION PLAN AMENDMENT City of Eagan Transportation Plan Amendment • To protect the investment made in Eagan's transportation system by managing development in accordance with the Comprehensive Land Use Guide Plan and not permitting uses which would generate trips in excess of roadway system capacity. Another goal of the City is the development of commercial areas within the City. With the pace of overall development, the City wants to ensure that adequate land areas be available for additional commercial development. This would provide services for its citizens, employment opportunities, and strengthen the tax base. The City undertook a comprehensive commercial land use study in 1994 to ensure a proper balance between residential and commercial properties. The study addressed potential commercial properties among which is an area known as the Central Area, which is located near Yankee Doodle and Pilot Knob Road (Figure 2). In recent years, pressure to develop vacant land in this area has been great. The City, recognizing that the transportation system is a key component in supporting continued • development of this area, completed a traffic study in 1994. This study was called "The Yankee Doodle Corridor Traffic Study". Purpose A transportation plan is vital to a growing community because it provides the framework for the City's future transportation infrastructure. The following objectives were used in developing changes to the existing system: • The plan will support the City's vision for the orderly growth over the ` next 20 years. • The plan will support the access and mobility of travelers, both from within and outside the City. • The plan will help maintain the integrity of the regional transportation system and will complement its function. / 3 3/28/95 1 ma I�: L N 1 V :r . 1 1. �i: e _ r 'r l? •� tiJ F E i i. }.:;:::: Z LU #cirri'`'i cii: :i :?::. 2 y �i':•.v tr`1•.. �I C ••� Z J { W Pj t c Q ``"err,;.;• , :ti:'.:•i:: :`.i:'..: tic .f!F , .4&- I� C, j < LU < � ' z .... ...... s... aa_.. V I — v /e! } .. ....;... is �.;..:•Y�.i.;i::i::;;'::,i:•:;i:�'::;::;.::...::: �``: ;M1 .+�•• .; , ::::: L Ot . : . .: 1 . . f i;: 4{:;::}::::_:::iii::{.:�.::'.•�'t::: .,:.::•. i::: :'} i>ii.C:•igf:::}'v}:>is ■ gs,;:i.....y:::::::.?::?..-...:.. . . .I. 7 .-.7 1`j._ •c ! aYpil NYYtK.n., 3 CI J� : T ,� o. o v � r ?z 0. ` f r • N::, ff M\�\ J O. cu"4 V Q CA 6 tl;1y r L v+ r. /Milk H1dON �T � o a Z 7 0 x C c {n N . - City of Eagan Transportation Plan Amendment 2. TRANSPORTATION PLAN ELEMENT A transportation plan has several interrelated, mutually supporting elements including the roadway system plan, by functional classification, a transit plan and travel demand management plan. These elements were analyzed for in the area designated as the Central Area. Central Area The city is pursuing the development of a Central Area near the intersection of I-35E and Yankee Doodle Road/Pilot Knob. This development would promote a dense mixed use development and would require a high level of transportation access. This area is the largest retail/commercial area in the City of Eagan. It is comprised of the O'Neil and Lance Planned Developments, Town Centre, and Yankee Square. In these three areas there is over 200 acres of land available for additional retail/commercial development. Additional development adjacent to these specific locations and growth in the surrounding communities has led the City to assess the ability of the primary and secondary roadway systems in this area to adequately accommodate the anticipated traffic growth. A review of the traffic volume data over the past five to ten years indicates that traffic in the Yankee Doodle corridor has grown 8 - 12 percent per year. Traffic counts and analysis were performed on nine of the key intersections in this corridor and it was determined that there were existing deficiencies at the following four intersections • Yankee Doodle/Pilot Knob (a.m. and p.m. peaks) • Yankee Doodle/I-35E East Ramp (a.m. and p.m. peaks) • Yankee Doodle/Denmark Avenue (p.m. peaks) • Pilot Knob/I-35E South Ramps (am. and p.m. peaks) In all of these cases, the volume to capacity ratio exceeds 1.0 during one of the peak hours. This means that the peak hour demand exceeds the capacity of the intersection and, as a result, certain movements must wait for more than one signal cycle to get through the intersection. In addition, the I-35E north ramps are at about 85 percent of their capacity, which indicates that limited capacity is available for future growth. In terms of delay, Yankee Doodle/Pilot Knob is at L.O.S. D, which is the maximum acceptable level of service during peak period operation. The Pilot Knob/I-35E south ramp is at L.O.S. E, which is unacceptable both from delay and air quality perspectives. (qs 5 3/28/95 City of Eagan Transportation Plan Amendment In summary there is insufficient capacity available to adequately provide for additional growth and development in this corridor to the extent that the City envisions. To accommodate the anticipated traffic growth and resolve many of the transportation concerns in the corridor, improvements to the existing facilities are proposed. The City of Eagan's current Transportation Plan indicates future freeway bridge crossings in the southwest quadrant of the Central Area at Duckwood Drive/Federal Road and in the northern quadrant approximately 2000 feet north of Yankee Doodle Road. The proposed transportation_plan amendment builds on this initial plan by adding local routes to serve as relievers to minor arterial routes (Pilot Knob Road and Yankee Doodle Road). In addition, it reconfigures the existing access to.I-35E to better separate and distribute trips, thereby improving the operation at the I-35E ramps. The proposed improvements will require modifications to the system as described in Table 1 and shown in Figure 3. Rationale for Proposed Changes The proposed improvements produce the following benefits to the local and regional systems: 1. They create a distribution system that diverts traffic from the minor arterials (Yankee Doodle Road and Pilot Knob Road) and from the I-35E ramp access intersections. 2. They create access capacity for freeway-oriented trips by diverting local trips onto the collector roads where they more appropriately belong. 3. They eliminate a set of double left-turns from both Yankee Doodle Road and Pilot Knob Road onto I-35E ramps. They also eliminate two intersections and two traffic signals at ramp intersections. 4. They result in a road system with complementary functions among the principal arterial (I-35E), the minor arterials (Yankee Doodle Road and Pilot Knob Road), and the collector and local street system that provide additional freeway crossings. 6 3128/95 w M 1 II < z A 2 i ly b , W o Y Q O I 2 • G:3f1N3AY NOIJNIX31 2 a• W �.•'�11''' } w N ■ Z . ■ Cr " • I {tl C W ° Q 0 Q • m�0 ,- W C. • a. �O _::• Qp.. Z Z �xa •••••••••• .1'1'4.. a co m E V F- 1.. z a CC ••. 13 r..m O '• • no c z W n. .,• �• 111 il•,• = o w a Z•• m • •••••••••••E cco= 3f1N3Ay vYN3a a - Z ■ _ E- a. W s 1183 .•3 mo m .. .M.,:.�i ' fi : G C i 13 ioY =i za ell :13- II • W • avow 8ON)UO110 o N ` 3 �o z W Q ac I 'L' =CC .d 1 Y ID o g .: H 03 CD;.4 tOSi' N *OW, a'n lo., = .„-- To G. o c — 3AIkl07.1130 • Q , 0 a ' m O m m c ° a z o�� E 0 m a E a m ° f ^ $ � E ; ° a C �u.o z la Cr) x N i City of Eagan Transportation Plan Amendment Table 1 Proposed System Modifications Map Index Proposed System Changes A Add freeway bridge crossing at Duckwood 'Drive with relocated northbound I-35E off-ramp and new southbound I-35E on-ramp. (Metering and HOV improvements included with ramp) B Close I-35E northbound off-ramp at Pilot Knob Road C Eliminate the left-turn from southbound off-ramp to northbound Pilot Knob. D Add third through lane on Yankee Doodle from Federal Road to Denmark Avenue. E Add northbound I-35E on-ramp from westbound Yankee Doodle Road. (Metering and HOV improvements included with ram.) F Close westbound left on Yankee Doodle to northbound I-35E ramp(loop access ramp) G Improve transit/park and ride facility by separating parking from transit drop-off areas and adding additional capacity by constructing a parking deck. 'Also, investigate options to encourage use of park-and-ride facilities, such as, providing additional amenities. H Construct additional arterial relievers to complete local collector system. Add freeway bridge crossing approximately one-half mile north of Yankee Doodle Road. 8 3/28/95 City of Eagan Transportation Plan Amendm nt 5. They improve the operations of the existing park-and-ride facility and bus transfer service. 6. They enhance pedestrian/bicycle activities by providing more pedestrian/ bicycle-friendly alternatives to Yankee Doodle Road and Pilot Knob Road. 7. The elimination of intersections, traffic signals and corresponding left-turn conflicts, and the resulting improvement of spacing between intersections is likely to result in a reduction in the number of accidents. 8. The benefits enumerated above will result in minimal changes in freeway operations while providing better future (2015) level of service than would be achieved under a No Build condition. 3. FUNCTIONAL CLASSIFICATION Transportation corridors perform many different functions in a community. They can provide space for recreational paths, utilities, landscaping and other public functions. A functional classification system is a way of identifying the corridors and how they balance the mobility of vehicles with the need to provide access, and other public functions. The functional classification is important in that these classifications are usually tied to such things as right-of-way dedication requirements, locations of other public facilities such as recreational paths, ability to provide direct access, and funding availability. The functional classification system for the metropolitan area was recently updated by the Metropolitan Council with the arterial routes being divided into two categories. An "As minor arterial is eligible for federal funding while a "B" minor arterial is not. A review of the city's existing functional classification system was undertaken, and revisions were made to the arterial classifications to conform to the Metropolitan Council's classification system. These changes are listed in Table 2 and shown in Figure 4. (9..b 9 3/28/95 /� J (.---.1... + wi,T/ . 1 L,,, I-494 LEGEND °� I-494 �f �''r"'"` " — ■m� Principal arterial r--'/' ' ^"" '"` �� A minor arterial ': ��+ t �{ ---- 8 minor arterial '."K "~ ■/ . 'i \' ' .: ,; ■ :•:F Jt , •••+r.1 1 I Long Oak Rd. ,•..:-' y- 4 ..;:ii fy, ! , ,�«.. . Yankee Doodle Rd. ..... ow ;if) L •.R,,t,�Nf..• i �. ..-•`....f r • • I/t t r'' :r ••••••, ;••:—...+� f t. Z s— • ■ • A. ,:N s,/.,.'°\ \...`('�,...:.s• f�" .......: ... /� '•.i ..� s ...''. ,..;.:,4'....."...." .. "�.^,.s..✓Zs• � kti. ' A'yam f'/rt ,.M�•%" i•••••? / ...i•V•...: ;,.,� t n.. ' Kt ...:,"•`•.ni .. ` •=r;. .,�'l••` 4./0.1.L''..,.,,,..::..:, •4.:....... , .,.. • ..;..:,..,•...,:.,++...,,ti,�.'•••,.. `• •,;••• ` :/ 1•' ,••..t} :=• '`'''.."'""'i' r`':f ;".,,;:••... ' 1 N7 / }.:..� !+•`:t. yr, „ , ♦•r, ... 4 • ;f.i >.4.f.r ' ■ �J. , , .1.%∎:�1 '. ^t,. N .. 4 :v: Difftey Rd.t.�•. .• . . •r i . � . w •! I r •. .,, a-•,.#nT =i �� . ( � }f if - •,.. y . n.,,' " . f •&s.. .r.. .. V i .w 4,l • ...•.t f•••••,..r +•1 r\,•••.`" \ v t L''''''":"'''''''' � j-. .i ,• ^.!•.. �. r ...6., • „„..1.4i V<i i i ... f f 1 t Y�Y.0 `"f ........1 +.i • ..,:t..,••s,.:.:" �'Y .-M^,'2'•�` �--�, ''�' '- ,.."....1,/......,:....:..4 �:,t ;;�i :„ Cliff Rd. r-4 •• .:.E;' , .% " .,?. `...�ii.�'�3s K.:„.:.,;.`�w,: -sub.k.,t,YS::>:••.:is3 v.,... ot'&Civ,uw..kst xkk;B3fS3e tkk<.w.?r{$(ox:C... :::ii. ,,,,, .. SCALE 1 0 1 2 mi i o . SSTRGAR-ROSC OE-FAUSCH,IIv CITY OF EAGAN FIGURE IRF CONSULTING ENCW EERS do IAL ROAD CLASSIFICATION 4 SRF NO.0931937 TRANSPORTATION PLAN AMENDMENT I - ._ City of Eagan Transportation Plan Amendment TABLE 2 CITY OF EAGAN FUNCTIONAL CLASSIFICATION (ARTERIALS) Route From To Classification - Minor Arterials Cliff Road I-35E Inver Grove Heights 'A' Expander Diffley Road Bumsville TH 3 '8' Expander Lexington Avenue TH 55 Cliff Road 'B' Expander Lone Oak Road TH 13 Inver Grove Heights 'A"Reliever Pilot Knob Road Mendota Heights Apple Valley 'A' Expander Yankee Doodle Road TH 13 Inver Grove Heights 'A' Expander TH 3 TH 149/Inver Grove Heights Rosemount 'A' Expander TH 13 Mendota Heights Cliff Road 'A'Reliever TH 149 TH 55 TH 3/Inver Grove Heights 'A" Expander TH 149 Mendota Heights TH 55 'A"Reliever Other Principal Arterials Cliff Road Burnsville I-35E TH 55 Mendota Heights Inver Grove Heights TH 77 Bloomington Apple Valley I Interstate Freeway I-35E Mendota Heights Bumsville 1-494 Bloomington Inver Grove Heights The City has chosen to divide its collector system into two categories, community collector and neighborhood collector. The community collector is designated to carry traffic along neighborhood boundaries for distances that may cross the entire community. The neighborhood collector is intended to collect traffic within'the neighborhood or typically within one square mile. These classifications were not modified. 4. IMPLEMENTATION • The City is working on an implementation plan for these transportation improvements. Much of the work would have to coincide with the anticipated development in the area adjacent to Yankee Doodle and 11 3/28/95 ic9 City of Eagan Transportation Plan Amendment Pilot Knob Roads. It is anticipated that a mixed use complex will develop in the area within the next three years. Improvements will be scheduled to accommodate development and traffic growth in the area. The City has discussed the interchange access modifications with MNDOT, Dakota County, and the Metropolitan Council. As a result of these discussions there is basic agreement on this concept and the access modifications. The proposed interchange access modifications, which are central to this plan, are going through a review process. A formal change in access request is also in process and will be submitted to the Metropolitan Council concurrently with this transportation plan amendment. It is anticipated that most of the improvements to interchanges and parallel reliever roads would be constructed within the next three to five years. The cost of the improvements is estimated to be 12 million dollars. The city is developing a financial plan for the improvements, which would involve the city, MNDOT and Dakota County. Mn/DOTs and Dakota County's share of the project cost is consistent with their current cost sharing policy. The local cost would be financed through a city wide levy, the Major Street Fund and assessments to development. 5. TRANSIT PLAN Since 1991, transit service has been provided within the City of Eagan by the Minnesota Valley Transit Authority (MVTA). Eagan, Apple Valley, Burnsville, Prior Lake, Savage and Rosemount constitute the MVTA using a joint-powers agreement. Each community as well as Dakota County and Scott County are voting members of the Authority's Board. The MVTA currently contracts for service with bus operators; the bulk of the service is operated by the Metropolitan Council Transit Operations (MCTO). Transit Planning Transit planning activities are the responsibility of the MVTA who works closely with technical staff from each community to coordinate transit planning activities. In addition, operations planning assistance is Dc 12 3/29/95 J City of Eagan Transportation Plan Amendment occasionally provided by the MCTO and the oth r operators. Th former Regional Transit Board completed a Dakota County Transit Plan; the Metropolitan Council provides mid and long-range planning services. Current Service and Ridership MVTA transit service levels have increased in recent years in response to continuing strong passenger demand. Currently, Eagan is served by eight bus routes operating a total of 44 a.m. and 45 p.m. trips Monday through Friday. Three routes provide peak period express service to downtown Minneapolis, two routes provide peak period express service to downtown St. Paul, two reverse commute runs from St. Paul to major employment centers including West Publishing and Blue Cross. In addition, one route provides hourly all-day service to the Mall of America offering connections to and from downtown Minneapolis (Table 3). TABLE 3 MVTA (1) EXISTING TRANSIT SERVICE CITY OF EAGAN Schedule Route No. (A.M.) (P.M.) Destination/Route Type M-F 77B 2 2 Minneapolis-Express 77C 4 5 Minneapolis- Express M-F 77D 4 4 Minneapolis- Eagan 77E 2 2 Minneapolis-Eagan M-F 77J 8 8 MOA- Local (60 min. in-travel) M-F 77G 11 12 MOA/WWA/GSANA- Local M-F 77W 5 6 MOA/Mpls-LocaUExpress M-F 72W 2 2 West Publishing- Express M-F 48E 5 3 St. Paul-Express M-F 19 1 1 Unisys/Blue Cross (1) Routes as of March 15, 1995, from MVTA. 13(0 13 3/28/95 • City of Eagan Transportation Plan Amendment Much of the existing service is oriented around two park-and-ride lots, including the Yankee Doodle and Pilot .Knob lot (approximately 230 spaces) and MNDOTs Blackhawk lot at Cliff Road and Blackhawk Road (approximately 283 spaces). In addition, a small portion • (approximately 35 spaces) of the parking lot at the Cedarvale Shopping Center is dedicated to park-and-ride use Other MVTA routes operate in adjacent communities; some Eagan residents may drive to park-and-rides in these communities if those lots are more convenient for them Ridership has steadily increased since MVTA service began as shown below. According to a 1992 on-board survey, 25% of MVTA riders ar Eagan residents. Therefore assuming the same percentage of ridership in 1994, one can estimate that approximately 1,044 riders/day were Eagan residents. MVTA RIDERSHIP (1) Total Ridership Year Ridershi• Total Year 1991 3,267 NA 1992 3,454 NA 1993 3,845 976,841 1994 4,177 1,046,984 1995 4,806 (January) 1,200,000 (est.) (1) Total rides on MVTA system. 1992 sway estimates 25 percent of rides were from Eagan residents. Future Service Plans Service will continue to be expanded within Eagan as demand warrants and financial resources allow. A major park-and-ride facility is tentatively planned to serve the TH 77/Cedar Avenue Corridor. . pie7 14 3/28/95 Agenda Information Memo May 15, 1995 City Council Meeting D. PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION AND MULTI-FAMILY SITE PLAN SENECA HILLS ADDITION ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: 1. To approve or deny a preliminary subdivision consisting of 40 lots for 38 townhouse units on 9.85 acres for the Seneca Hills subdivision located on the east side of Highway 13 just north of Silver Bell Shopping Center in the southwest quarter of Section 17 subject to the 22 conditions recommended by the Advisory Planning Commission. 2. To approve or deny the multi-family site plan for the 40 lots on 38 townhouse'units on the same property. FACTS: • The proposed townhouse development is consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan and the existing R-3 zoning. • The Advisory Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on April 25, 1995 and recommends approval subject to conditions. • Jim Waters of LGA Investment Group stated that he concurred with the conditions in the staff report. BACKGROUND/ATTACHMENTS: (2) Minutes of the Advis Nanning Commission meeting - pag@520? Staff report on pag'() throught-23> • Page 13 April 25, 1995 ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION SENECA HILLS - PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION AND MULTIPLE FAMILY SITE PLAN Chairperson Miller opened the next public hearing of the evening regarding a Preliminary Subdivision (Seneca Hills Addition) and a Multiple Family Site Plan consisting of 40 lots on approximately 10 acres for 38 townhouse units located east of Highway 13 and north of Silver Bell Shopping Center in the SW1/4 of Section 17. Project Planner Ridley introduced this item. Mr. Ridley highlighted the information presented in the City staffs planning report dated April 17, 1995, as amended • by City staff on April 25, 1995. Mr. Ridley noted the background and history, the existing conditions and the surrounding uses of the subject property. Mr. Ridley noted that the landscaping and the tree preservation plans were unacceptable as originally submitted. Mr. Ridley noted that the applicant has since submitted a revised plan which brings the tree preservation plan more into compliance; however, additional revisions were necessary and the Developer was willing to work with the City Forester. Mr. Ridley concluded that the proposed land use is consistent with the future and existing development of the area. ., . . . Jim Waters of L.G.A. Investment Group, representative of the applicant, stated that he concurs with the staffs report. He further stated that the revised tree preservation plan reduces tree loss to 28% from the 37'/2% as originally proposed. The applicant requests approval of its proposal. A resident who resides at the Shannon Glen Condominiums stated that she was not opposed to the development but was concerned with the development's impact on the wildlife refuge and the poor water quality of the nearby drainage pond. John Wingard, Development/Design Engineer; stated that the pond in the southeast corner of the subject property has had maintenance problems and as a result the applicant has agreed to excavate the pond ten feet for a lower elevation and to install inlet and outlet piping-for water quality management. Wingard further stated that the work done to promote the water quality of the pond will result in tree loss. Member Heyl moved, Isberg seconded, a motion to recommend approval of the Preliminary Subdivision Plan consisting of 40 lots for 38 townhouse units on 9.85 acres located on the east side of Highway 13, just north of Silver Bell Shopping Center in the SW1/4 of Section 17, subject to the following conditions: Standard Conditions Page 14 April 25, 1995 ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION 1. These standard conditions of plat approval as adopted by Council action on February 2, 1993, shall be complied with: Al, Bi, B2, B3, B4, Cl, C2, C3, C4, D1, El, Fl, G1, and H1. Architecture 2. The exterior building materials shall be maintenance free and include a minimum of 20% brick. Site Plan 3. Setback issues will be addressed subsequent to staff approval of a Tree Preservation Plan. Landscaping 4. The Landscape Plan shall be revised to add more plant material, a plant material schedule, and a typical planting plan around each building. 5. The revised Landscape Plan shall be reviewed and approved by staff prior to City Council action on the Final Subdivision. Grading/Utilities 6. The Developer shall revise the Grading Plan to provide a five foot berm along the Highway 13 right-of-way. 7. The Developer shall abandon all well and septic systems on site according to Dakota County and City standards. 8. Detailed plans and specs showing the retaining wall construction shall be reviewed and approved by City staff, prior to any site grading. 9. A fence or railing between 4-6' in height shall be built at the top of the retaining wall system. 10. The Developer shall construct 400' of 8" sanitary sewer to the north of this site along the MnDOT Highway 13 right-of-way line to provide sanitary sewer service to this site. Right-Of-Way • Page 15 April 25, 1995 ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION 11. Appropriate public right-of-way width shall be determined prior to City Council action of the Final Subdivision. 12. If the Centex development to the north does not proceed in conjunction with this project, the Developer shall obtain the additional 2,500 SF of additional right- of-way for the public street connection with Highway 13, prior to Final Subdivision approval. 13. The Developer is responsible for the cost of any required improvements o the Highway 13/Seneca Road intersection. • 14. Highway 13/Seneca Road intersection issues shall be resolved prior to City Council action on the Final Subdivision. 15. The Developer shall dedicate restricted access along Highway 13 (except at the access point). 16. Site Plan approval, as proposed in relation to Lots 4-8, Block 1, is contingent upon City Council approval/authorization of vacation of the easement for the existing 15" storm sewer line. Tree Preservation 17. A revised tree and woodland preservation plan must be reviewed and approved by City staff prior to City Council action on this Preliminary Subdivision. 18. The Developer shall provide tree protection measures (i.e. 4 foot polyethylene laminate safety netting) to be installed at the Drip Line or at the perimeter of the Critical Root Zone, whichever is greater, of the significant trees/woodlands to be preserved. 19. The Developer shall contact the City Forestry Division at least five days prior to any site grading to ensure compliance with the approved Tree Preservation Plan. Dedications 20. This development is subject to a cash park, trail, and water quality dedication. ( Page 16 April 25, 1995 ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION Homeowners' Association 21. The Developer shall be responsible for preparing and recording, with the plat, appropriate documents establishing a Homeowners' Association. The documents must be submitted and approved by the City Attorney's office prior to final plat approval. Transfers of common areas to the Homeowners' Association shall be recorded with the plat. Platting • 22. The Developer shall plat the subdivision. All approved in favor. Member Hey! moved, Isberg seconded, a motion to recommend approval of the Multiple Family Site Plan consisting of 40 lots for 38 townhouse units on 9.85 acres located on the east side of Highway 13, just north of Silver Bell Shopping Center in the SW1/4 of Section 17. All approved in favor. ta- PLANNING REPORT CITY OF EAGAN REPORT DATE: April 17, 1995 CASE #: 17-PP-8-3-95 APPLICANT: L.G.A. Investment Group HEARING DATE: April 25, 1995 PROPERTY OWNER Todd Utecht PREPARED BY: Mike Ridley REQUEST: Preliminary Subdivision (Seneca Hills) and Multi-Family Site Plan LOCATION: 3768 Sibley Memorial Highway COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: D-III, Mixed Residential (6-12 u/ac) ZONING: Townhouse, R-3 SUMMARY OF REQUEST The L.G.A. Investment Group is requesting approval of a Preliminary Subdivision and Multiple Family Site Plan consisting of 40 lots for 38 townhouse units on 9.85 acres located on the east side of Highway 13,just north of the Silver Bell Shopping Center in the SW 1/4 of Section 17. AUTHORITY FOR REVIEW City Code Chapter 13, Section 13.20, Subd. 6. states:In the case of subdivision, the Planning Commission and the Council shall be guided by criteria, including the following, in approving, denying or establishing conditions related thereto: A. That the proposed subdivision does comply with applicable City Code provisions and the Comprehensive Guide Plan. B. That the design or improvement of the proposed subdivision complies with applicable plans of Dakota County, State of Minnesota, or the Metropolitan Council. C. That the physical characteristics of the site including, but not limited to, topography, vegetation, susceptibility to erosion and siltation, susceptibility to flooding, water storage, and retention are such that the site is suitable for the type of development or use contemplated. D. That the site physically is suitable for the proposed density of development. E. That the design of the subdivision or the proposed improvements is not likely to cause environmental damage. a13 Planning Report - Seneca Hills April 25, 1995 Page 2 F. That the design of the subdivision or the type of improvements is not likely to cause health problems. G. That the design of the subdivision or the improvements will not conflict with easements of record or with easements established by judgement of court. H. That completion of the proposed development of the subdivision can be completed in a timely manner so as not to cause an economic burden upon the City for maintenance, repayment of bonds or similar burden. I. That the subdivision has been properly planned for possible solar energy system use within the subdivision or as it relates to adjacent property. (Refer to City Handbook - on Solar Access). J. That the design of public improvements for the subdivision is compatible and consistent with the platting or approved preliminary plat on adjacent lands. K. That the subdivision is in compliance with those standards set forth in that certain document entitled"City of Eagan Water Quality Management Plan for the Gun Club Lake Watershed Management Organization" which document is properly approved and filed with the office of the City Clerk hereinafter referred to as the "Water Quality Management Plan". Said document and all of the notations, references and other information contained therein shall have the same force and effect as if fully set down herein and is hereby made a part of this Chapter by reference and incorporated herein as fully as if set forth herein at length. It shall be the responsibility of the City Clerk to maintain the Water Quality Management Plan and make the same available to the public. BACKGROUND/HISTORY This proposal includes an unplatted 8.6 acre parcel that has had no previous development requests associated with it and a 1.2 acre parcel currently platted as Outlot A, Eagan Metro Center 2nd Addition (Shannon Glen Condominiums), which was platted in 1980. Review of the Eagan Metro 2nd Addn plat file indicates that this portion of the subdivision was platted as an outlot merely for tax purposes. EXISTING CONDITIONS There is an existing home on the site that was built in 1957. The ten acre site is located on a north/west facing slope adjacent to Highway 13 just south of the 40 acre Goodman property (Centex development). The site is approximately fifty percent wooded with a variety of deciduous and conifer species. The existing vegetation is concentrated to the east Planning Report - Seneca Hills April 25, 1995 Page 3 half of the site, surrounding the house, outbuildings and pool area. SURROUNDING USES The following uses, zoning and comprehensive plan designations surround the subject property: North - Undeveloped (Centex proposal) - zoned R-3 and designated D-III. South - Silver Bell Center/Shannon Glen Condos; zoned NB/R-4; designated NB/D-W. East - Shannon Glen Condos; zoned R-4; designated D-IV. West - Hwy 13/assorted industrial; zoned Light Industrial; designated Industrial. EVALUATION OF REQUEST Preliminary Subdivision Compatibility with Surrounding Area-The proposed land use is consistent with the existing zoning(R-3) and Guide Plan designation (D-III). The 10 acre townhouse development will be compatible with the immediate area surrounding the site, as well as the general area of the City. Density-The gross site density of the proposal is 3.9 units/acre. Removing the public right- of-way and wetland area results in a net site density of 5.2 units/acre. Units - The developer is proposing all single story units. Each 1,500 SF unit has two bedrooms and an attached double car garage. The site grade will allow approximately half of the units to constructed with rear walkouts. Architecture -The developer has provided staff a preliminary building design; however, the elevation drawing does not identify the type of exterior materials to be used or the amount of brick. The developer has not finalized the particular materials to be used;however, some percentage (generally 20-40%) of the maintenance-free exterior should consist of brick. Setbacks -All front and rear building setbacks are met;however, the developer is proposing a number of side yard building setback variances. The original submission provided 20'side yard setbacks between buildings and the developer was informed that the required setback between buildings in the R-3 zone is 30'. The revised Site Plan proposes a 5' side setback variance to allow a building separation of 25' between buildings on Lots 6 & 7, 8 & 9, Block 1 and Lots 2 & 3, 4 & 5, 6 & 7, 8 & 9, 10& 11, Block 2. The developer also proposes a 20' setback between the buildings on Lots 12 & 13, Block 1. C(?/15 Planning Report - Seneca Hills April 25, 1995 Page 4 According to the developer, the proposed setback deviations are requested so that more trees and woodlands can be saved. The Advisory Parks, Recreation, and Natural Resource Commission(APRNRC) reviewed the revised plans on April 17, 1995 and directed the City Forester to work with the developer to provide a more acceptable tree and woodland preservation plan. Landscaping-The Landscape Plan submitted is not acceptable. The plan should be revised to increase the number of evergreen and deciduous trees and the incorporation of ornamental trees, shrubs, and ground covers. The plan should include a proper plant material schedule indicating: plant size, root condition, and quantities. Additional information should also include a typical planting plan for each building. Grading/Wetlands - With minor revisions, the Grading Plan submitted will be acceptable. The plan should be revised to add a five foot high berm along the Highway 13 right-of-way. There will be a maximum cut of 20 feet and a maximum fill of nine feet. The Plan also shows a 14-18' tall retaining wall behind units 21-24. Due to the height of the wall the developer should provide a fence or railing at the top of the wall. Neither of the two small jurisdictional wetlands on site that comprise 0.34 acres will be filled or drained. Storm Drainage/Water Quality -The Storm Drainage Plan submitted is acceptable. Storm runoff from this site will be directed to Pond AP-5.2, located on the property to the north. The bottom of the small wetland located in the southeast corner of the site (Pond AP-5) should be lowered approximately ten feet to improve the water quality treatment capabilities of this pond. Utilities - The Utility Plan submitted is acceptable. The developer must extend a sanitary sewer line approximately 400 feet along the Highway 13 (MnDot) right-of-way to serve the site. The developer must also extend watermain approximately 260 feet across Highway 13 at the Seneca Road intersection to serve the site. Although the watermain system in this area is fed from the low level pressure zone, the water pressure to all of the proposed units should be adequate. Sidewalks - The developer will be constructing an 8' bituminous trail along the southerly edge of the proposed street. The trail is proposed to extend through the Vermilion development to Robin Lane. Access/Street Design - The access and street design is acceptable. The site will be served by a single public street that connects to Highway 13 at the Seneca Road intersection, curves 0? / (e Planning Report - Seneca Hills April 25, 1995 Page 5 easterly through the site before turning north and heading into the 40 acre Goodman property. The street design also provides for an eight bituminous trail to be constructed along the south side of the public street. MnDOT has reviewed the proposed subdivision and is requesting modifications to Highway 13 at the Seneca Road intersection. The cost of any modification/improvements shall be born by the developer. City staff is reviewing the design and right-of-way width of the proposed internal public street. Depending on the final configuration of the Seneca Road/Highway 13 intersection, traffic projections may warrant a wider public street to properly serve this development. If this project develops prior to the Centex project, the developer will be responsible for providing a temporary cul-de-sac in the north east area of the subdivision. Easements/Right-Of-Way/Permits-At staff's request,the developer provided a 65'right-of- way for the public street. The ultimate right-of-way width necessary may change when the Highway 13 access issue is resolved. The developer will be responsible for vacating the existing storm sewer easement as part of the realignment of this line. The proposed layout of Lots 4-8, Block 1, is contingent upon City Council approval/authorization of vacation of the easement for the existing 15" storm sewer line. The proposed public street connection to Highway 13 is predicated on the proposed Centex development dedicating approximately 2,500 SF of right-of-way for this intersection. If the Centex development does not proceed in a timely fashion, L.G.A. Investment Group will be responsible for obtaining this additional right-of-way. If a temporary cul-de-sac is necessary due to timing issues, the developer shall obtain an easement for the cul-de-sac if it is to be located off the subject site. The developer will be required to obtain permits from MnDot for work in the Highway 13 r-o-w and the construction of utilities will require permits from MPCA, MCWS, and Minnesota Department of Health. Tree_Preservation Policy - The Tree Preservation Plan submitted is unacceptable. The developer is proposing to remove 69.3% of the significant woodlands on site. This exceeds the allowable removal (without mitigation) of 47.5%. As proposed, the mitigation required for this level of removal is 136 category B or 273 Category C trees. The APRNRC is requesting the developer to provide a more sensitive site layout in relation 4 ^1 C ) Planning Report - Seneca Hills April 25, 1995 Page 6 to significant trees and woodlands on site. In this regard, the APRNRC directed the developer to work with the City Forester to bring the tree loss percentages into a more acceptable range with specific attention being paid to a number of"specimen" trees, which are 30" or larger hard wood trees. The developer should also revise the plan to relocate the tree protection fencing further away from the "save trees" a distance equal to one foot setback for every inch of tree diameter. Any required mitigation replacement trees shall be added to the revised Landscape Plan after it has been approved by staff. Park Dedication - The APRNRC is recommending a cash park and trail dedication. The developer will receive a trail dedication credit for constructing an eight foot wide bituminous trail along the south side of the proposed public street. SUMMARY/CONCLUSION The proposed land use is consistent with the existing zoning and guide plan designation of this property. The development will be compatible with existing and future development in the area. The general development layout, proposed access, and density will provide a suitable site development; however, specific natural resource issues must be resolved. Generally,setback variances have been viewed in a favorable light by the Advisory Planning Commission and City Council, if the departure from the strict application of setback requirements results in an elevated preservation of natural resources. The proposed development,utilizing reduced side yard building setbacks,substantially exceeds the allowed amount of significant woodland removal (without mitigation) for this site. The reduced side yard setbacks have allowed the developer more latitude in building placement; however, the APRNRC was not satisfied with the end result. Depending on the outcome of further design work between the developer and the City Forester, modification to the site layout is likely. If a satisfactory reduction in tree/woodland loss does not occur, the APRNRC has directed the City Forester to bring the item back before the commission at their regularly scheduled meeting in May. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED To approve/deny the Site Plan for a 38 unit townhouse development and a Preliminary Subdivision for Seneca Hills, consisting of 40 lots on 9.85 acres located at 3768 Sibley Memorial Highway in the SW 1/4 of Section 17. Approval subject to the following conditions. %17 f Planning Report - Seneca Hills April 25, 1995 Page 7 Standard Conditions 1. These standard conditions of plat approval as adopted by Council action on February 2, 1993 shall be complied with: Al, Bi, B2, B3, B4, Cl, C2, C3, C4, D1, El, Fl, G1, and Hl. Architecture 2. The exterior building materials shall be maintenance free and include a minimum of 20% brick. Site Plan 3. Setback issues will be addressed subsequent to staff approval of a Tree Preservation Plan. Landscaping 4. The Landscape Plan shall be revised to add more plant material, a plant material schedule, and a typical planting plan around each building. 5. The revised Landscape Plan shall be reviewed and approved by staff prior to City Council action on the Final Subdivision. Grading/Utilities 6. The developer shall revise the Grading Plan to provide a five foot berm along the Highway 13 right-of-way. 7. The developer shall abandon all well and septic systems on site according to Dakota County and City standards. 8. Detailed plans and specs showing the retaining wall construction shall be reviewed and approved by City staff, prior to any site grading. 9. A fence or railing between 4-6' in height shall be built at the top of the retaining wall system. 10. The developer shall construct 400' of 8" sanitary sewer to the north of this site along the MnDOT Highway 13 right-of-way line to provide sanitary sewer service to this site. Right-Of-Way 11. Appropriate public right-of-way width shall be determined prior to City Council action on the Final Subdivision. r Planning Report - Seneca Hills April 25, 1995 Page 8 12. If the Centex development to the north does not proceed in conjunction with this project, the developer shall obtain the additional 2,500 SF of additional right-of-way for the public street connection with Highway 13,prior to Final Subdivision approval. 13. The developer is responsible for the cost of any required improvements to the Highway 13/Seneca Road intersection. 14. Highway 13/Seneca Road intersection issues shall be resolved prior to City Council action on the Final Subdivision. 15. The developer shall dedicate restricted access along Highway 13 (except at the access point). 16. Site Plan approval, as proposed in relation to Lots 4-8, Block 1, is contingent upon City Council approval/authorization of vacation of the easement for the existing 15" storm sewer line. Tree Preservation 17. A revised tree and woodland preservation plan must be reviewed and approved by City staff prior to City Council action on this Preliminary Subdivision. 18. The developer shall provide tree protection measures (i.e. 4 foot polyethylene laminate safety netting) to be installed at the Drip Line or at the perimeter of the Critical Root Zone, whichever is greater, of the significant trees/woodlands to be preserved. 19. The developer shall contact the City Forestry Division at least five days prior to any site grading to ensure compliance with the approved Tree Preservation Plan. Dedications 20. This development is subject to cash park, trail, and water quality dedication. Homeowners' Association 21. The developer shall be responsible for preparing and recording, with the plat, appropriate documents establishing a Homeowners' Association. The documents must be submitted and approved by the City Attorney's office prior to final plat approval. Transfers of common areas to the Homeowners' Association shall be recorded with the plat. Platting 22. The developer shall plat the subdivision. 677 dr STANDARD CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL A. Financial Obligations 1. This development shall accept its additional financial obligations as defined in the staff's report in accordance with the final plat dimensions and the rates in effect at the time of final plat approval. • B. Easements and Rights-of-Way 1. This development shall dedicate 10-foot drainage and utility easements centered over all lot lines and, in addition, where necessary to accommodate existing or proposed utilities for drainage ways within the plat. The development shall dedicate easements of sufficient width and location as determined necessary by engineering'standards. 2. This development shall dedicate, provide, or financially guarantee the acquisition costs of drainage, ponding, and utility easements in addition to public street rights-of-way as required by the alignment, depth, and storage capacity of all required public utilities and streets located beyond the boundaries of this plat as necessary to service or accommodate this • development. • 3. • This development shall dedicate all public right-of-way and temporary slope easements for ultimate development of adjacent roadways as required by the appropriate jurisdictional agency. 4. This development shall dedicate adequate drainage and ponding easements to incorporate the required high water elevation plus three (3) feet as • necessitated by storm water storage volume requirements. C. Plans and Specifications 1. All public and private streets, drainage systems and utilities necessary to provide service to this development shall be designed and certified by a registered professional engineer in accordance with City adopted codes, engineering standards, guidelines and policies prior to application for final plat approval. 2. A detailed grading, drainage, erosion, and sediment control plan must be prepared in accordance with current City standards prior to final plat approval. 3. This development shall ensure that all dead-end public streets shall have a cul-de-sac constructed in accordance with City engineering standards. • .c7q:7 ( • • 4. A separate detailed landscape plan shall be submitted overlaid on the proposed grading and utility plan. The financial guarantee for such plan shall be included in the Development Contract and shall not be released until one year after the date of City certified compliance. D. Public Improvements .1. if any improvements are to be installed under a City contract, the appropriate project must be approved by Council action prior to final plat approval. • E. Permits 1. This development shall be responsible for the acquisition of all regulatory agency permits required by the affected agency prior to final plat approval. F. Parks and Trails Dedication 1. This development shall fulfill its park and trail dedication requirements as recommended by the Advisory Parks, Recreation and Natural Resource Commission and approved by Council action. G. Water Quality Dedication 1. This development shall be responsible for providing a cash dedication, ponding, or a combination thereof in accordance with the criteria identified in the City's Water Quality Management Plan, as recommended by the Advisory Parks, Recreation and Natural Resource Commission and approved by Council action. H. Other 1. All subdivision,zoning and other ordinances affecting this development shall be adhered to, unless specifically granted a variance by Council action. Advisory Planning Commission City Council Approved: August 25. 1987 _ September 15A 1987 Revised: July W. 1990 Revised: _February 2. 1993 TA S TAN DARD.CON FINANCIAL OBLIGATION - Seneca Hills There are pay-off balances of special assessments totaling $5,739 on the parcels proposed for platting. The pay-off balance will be allocated to the lots created by the plat. At this time, there are no pending assessments on the parcel proposed for platting. The estimated financial obligation presented is subject to change based upon areas,dimensions and land uses contained in the final plat. Based upon the study of the financial obligations collected in the past and the uses proposed for the property, the following charges are proposed. The charges are computed using the City's existing fee schedule and connections proposed to be made to the City's utility system based on the submitted plans. Improvement Use Rate Quantity Amount Water Trunk M.F. $835/lot 33 lots $27,555 Lateral Benefit Storm Sewer M.F $45.10.L.F. 75 L.F. 3,382 Storm Sewer Trunk M.F. $.02/sq ft 358,943 sq ft 7.175 Total $37,666 I ._.- �ETENDHp ST /� I ; 97- 7r/; 1 ] • V 1 ` /~/ I f1 W1 _ QI I ,-,,,,,._4.4. /4.1'. IKI I L N , t: :I % E` =1=�1 O1 �Or \\ �/ ._ ...... ,....._..._.w.._a.— i.:=.771 —-- I- may., �• -—- - 'll \ I I ' �1 WA TER TREATN // / 1 tril FACIUT' o C11 �il� I �o� ��4, FA MA I c.°' ,� 'Pry P1 �'� @ � 1 'Z 1 r I ♦ c�' Awt 3 ! SKFtARK L�RDAD 17— —_�----18.E-��1� Ir ; \ ■ n :N.I Cr P"r�,`d A �� I ?,rte i AF St. A \1 MONTEREY i N.s I 7•~`9,A�` AGO ! z V �a ?\‘'Y )cco Ils I �.n ;HAZEL *'''' q. I J,r„ W, R0. y. .o elk / _'�-- I SILVER I �jBE�LL -- / SI.V BELL RO' � - �(�'RiVE ON \ - sl a'`J I� �. r:Az,k .,IL., 'aW i ....„____I `.. \1 , 1 II �J ,I.L. ,�Jr•Y s I�i ti� alt., U I Y^6-W a PARI ......, (Th $,� o�' lv I \ co o � o-ao EpE WF DR '4C es„pp• I PARK 'AORNtLr=-' .; 1 `4L I G�vF. �O. e O G , 1 re . -• K.,./) ' VI'•�'0 `r Vs fi NT. AV ./69 Sa .I CP I tar ABM TR I I " : r — 1 rl 2� 7 �I I t _ ( OEERw00D_�+:. DR. -— l 'I ? LA. s >R S c \ ` TR TwaaE 1wLL C T. .s.I it CIS ,L.. 4Vj• , �1_.r.�� 7 v STONF.p' y• till r �C't, !-• � 1. R r�a CaR I ARNELIAN r -1• ;APP IRE LA� \5!(� ... •_ANE PARK?3 0 J ! 97 ' I.SEA0011LAII er P,•p4p I - _ I• CORAL LA Id.. �y1' 1,19 I I i I I FPMU' uK CT �4 :az, ,, GLORY 0 • -.C4/4R \G all 1 :A• ER';�� 4.1 - -cc. t ))w. ..6:4,72/...( SENECA HILLS .',�• �.,,4 D-II PF :j.. :.':•.]� i l 0 II �fmGNr Ro. C • 04 D■III \ :--t••17 g • 'Yip.e. COMPREHENSIVE GUIDE PLAN ;'' ;_ . ID-H1 Mixed Residential (6-12 units/acre) SwY�p ~� C A r' 0.111 t 1 ' , I D■II d ,':''. '.:::-.%- lik;511P01 AM r .,,,,p4 o-II I — _ Ate/Y —/,- .,,,,' • ` .. ,?�..f,.y+r.M .-•2+.,-... -• . LI• 'ATM E40_F •r��vim—OFF! .r=aces x R� "'-- tante - : 2 e: • • -,-4. OR-1. ,i v k.•, •ZONING `\aaomcw • L \a\ �4 - R-3 s .aoel / r.. ;•-• R-3 Townhouse a sa a�xrA� acRa- , , , ,'....G 7.s.. 4 r9-40 1 ,"" , .... _a . 1401 1���' ',.+•;:n ,..1,'),••`. PARK 1F.0. CS `i .0 N Y' •1 L77-73157'-1'( _ • /"00(_,_,/{ ' — 4160, •fit aEG:-tarts 1b.V x : ' 1 Y A R-4 K ; ___ PK-- .� 4 4. SENECA HILLS ta.(9.....5----- • •) Q i : t1 ..... r a . •• Q ti l - - . ._ , . ,_ . _. ....... .. ...... . % .... . \to•.■=*,..■.. .: 1 . # —\•:44 ''''' ."......■■•"""". . i i t ;111 r i salt -1' i k 4 , , 4• n 41 • a % — ' / gill }} 3 , • ,� CC ' Al* ::44:,.. r ....---.... ..1 Alltir r li'% es E� Y21 � � 1 L I i ,I alit Oi a . 1= S . Or as a r,, o's ...../..., r.............:„.... al, ,, at , . . ... 0:•- k ate ! Iiila - 1 :*: *I ---/..... ailiir % II I ■ .'VI.' ,i4 : . . iii, ....„.,. "7 : ' 2 : .. , , ..* %.%. . • ,.. 1'. 1.1+ tt isr./..\\ -74.4,s. .r {1 Y er . ; .il ' 1 u1= i1 jt. tl i hn��i ® :{ git . iii �� :i e: „2. 1„)......67 _. . • • I 1 / 11'• (4f3 I" 1 N� /,1// • ' r ii • — % / ice` .v • r \ .' ~ ' ..,/ / / r ! , . , . L_ , I 4,,,/;),,,,,, / / _\ 1 \ <, -.7:-.3i 6,,A.:,R!lLiT.r.Ttt/:.„n Iv,04,0 •, 11111 ...z..... "Pi .. 1.01.04= • r'„,'.:.:3.S.c,..Z:■";;Ill.51 *kt7S.t ■t .14v* ,// 8:1 Illtii:ii 1 • i.i ' ;,.....s .4„,,...,.......1\,,41116.------):Miu. 1 in. 70." •A ii,;,,,,,,, jt,'e 'Itl i/Mr • . -, ■ Nyr."'" , .1 fee,'I ,. , '',W' lii [s .a v „,;A #4, '.., la , I I 1 • kir %) v t l■ . \-- • ..",.,•tri b . .. ..,.. ,, , ,„., . ->Z.: ' • 7 trat_gifri.-• ;..g.-1--.: 8 1 ."'' If fir , t,N. 1 r II ..,:e....:"::.---,,„ ...40.• ','; ...,• '-'-zar, • Malt d 1 0/ •( i \ '.......'.? •- • --4 -1 -1111Kiel,mi ViallatiktkpA04111111..r„ 71 / i • . ‘ '• #21141014MANCinfilik, / .., 14.1•. \\ ,..„. .... ..:?:. ,.,,,,,.. . „6„1„... , .„/„.• , ,,..,,. , ii ii,.. ,....,_. ......, .„.„,..,.., . , ........ (....... ..., ,,,... N II ............) . s':z/ \\Z....Ns 4.1\", I .„....."'Ng , .,•11 4 I 8. .`� '\ �f • ..7'. 1 • 11, i 4.\ . ./�'\'', ,�•\ • t.,•..• 1 J J ♦`♦ ». \ �` J=� •■•,.• : ,%\" .• t£ H / . . _ (E) !lai • • ` \. •lie• • • . ey,./It. c9,: 7 . . lo'o Lim • II ii i• • �i -. t I . /,////..-■ ,• if •,_ A \, ,, ...eitn,•• ,, • 1', ///i i ,,,.... NA.12 :II:. t ,% i ! 6 cL••.'L-• i���I?.i .r r P ST/Li." "j ' ' �,/ • 'I,,,* I N 10 . . / �� f //r/// 11 gi . • `. \ G I / 40 /,r,///i//• .4. ,-..tre, ILI -- •••••• --",li ... 4,r i 7441 .2 -4 '''' / Y /// , ..4 „.••• , I 7/0-.� - l ^^� '• � o, 1111 f / 11 l t \ ii ;Z ',4 4' • Tat a . ,..-;- * pia"r 3 . \!data. • \,; j i it sir r let N.- \I\ i1ii I. � ,\ ♦` , % '.,`;; i� sit ■• \ .i• - �,/_' •% , 1 . li .4,9, .,.•-• ,,--.....- .4--....-F04_,.„.,-,` J� -T- N. -7 11 + 1 J /v„•N ..< 14, tos-Jr,r...117 ,<---f : . . •Ii• , S .3 i I '• \ 7J \ 11 �. /' 1 .1 L! �'•,, ` 1\`\ \ • •• 1 1 \ it { '` \ \ \. 0 . i Iil icy `, \�\ \� `�` it. .. `',�. III •:,., Ii. .. \ •iii,,•' lit', {® �� • \ ,�� / �`~'��•' [r7 •i '• I . ,aq/ 8all ZOOd NdZZ:ZI 56-E0-1,0 X1.6.01 y • 366117 n4r1 ow lim•VIIrilipr'" •s•sr.rrsrrww.1l a I 1143Wd017n70 1S.11lIO — Ch101630 /,yrNl•l'1lilr J 1 ' 1 41 4-., r . } I 'r. al t J . T I'. - # , rr.r rr.r / 4 r I I 1 , usr • ,,,,,,,,, IF., ( ii' „ ,I rrr■ Milli ••••rr 1ft I, � ■r-r• III)I film'�•r■ ••r• , r•s t .� ■r•• , rrrr rrrr rrr•, su■ I �I ■rrr som , ass 'srr■ \ F� , ' ■rr■ uir■ I� rss■ ) 1104 .., ;I 11111:111i..ii.... 1:1'. .-iil . I 4.,I I NM=MN I; 1• it. .. , .1-.., . . . ••;...... 4.. . ‘ ifk Vs I i 1 _ I- d II ill r � ❑i ^ 111 i _ 1I � • o ' g �I •�l cam, � lI 1 toa 2/2•d .• 96C0 TO, rid 22:ET S6. Ee add" 7 .• <° � 1 /'—••..• / �✓ � � AOID.J(.bb.tY'h�o•ka -- - • --- - • • /y A, • ; o. I CP-T_, ,>lJ6utrb1,1 929.7• MI_r• ` N �� • 2No AOC. .• 0+ e. PLAN' 111.C.0 / / \,c• I 16 - /... P 826.5 IC E. 829.6 RKS_ 5 ., 'y, w//'HDUSP 'AL% 0 \ 43 bLOG'A I �``�' � m_ ;r�.rrina -1 i‘y A-b y`)4. 790.7 0. • .7 vis 0 7____, ` `��'�"`� q• R1Qlctw ,cam • �• T� r11��,,r��rl' . w' 3s C C . - IcENOF _ ,p� ad SILVER .'' Y 74,5 '- _ .`9 e 7•' � �OIT10N •� • �� '. .3ut *2:ND\/` A-h AP-38 �0' "/� f L•CK• �� "! DALLAS `, / 94/.4 A-0 F3Afj41448c-'12. � �% � :8:• m �� • ./\ ( 7.---- ois�, LL �_ �� OW j -���__11 8 t 4821 1S7 A: y GAN ME1�{9/G � I Ble. y�� ) l yn�j. • %11fi : •� 2Alt- , *1.4 `� F - It-�AS g`(► 14 . \ 9QV.3.�y .�•Ltn� 4��� r� •■ " BLACKHt� 7`3R \olpo oli�i �'k. S. to; ; h c , 1 • ■ 6" o `. - B )O 27 _‘ ,`nom • � - 10E X80:3,: ,i, ' i Ti .-All'r ;lie 401 PARK 'S P-2 ..ti ; l\ M. A-� ';4.,,.. f ■ u i 11��at �i►r. = oru3' 792,:3 "i,•/" N� A P .Up N ` • •4 ''' ,.{1 TIM- , �_ �= .. .' __'F 8P-29.1 ��/7"//:-__.• Il' . ,!�\, 806:6.._._ -• ' • - ail 7 ii)1 ��- - - 916.0 , 9c' ►-cccy•` _�-� r ., • 4� u�� .-Ti... Iwo ii - 920.0 I ., vAi - 7- /..-.4:It II 40 -s 886. �'` ti`t' tt :� .i RTas•R,, ■ f .{4:J Tz' Til r� o� .) : -'1 I-- ... ..rrc n A�t _c me l 1 �r- y1,�.. I PROJECT SITE . . ..._... _ FIGURE No. 17 STORM SEWER LAYOUT LE • MONO M APR' e: .i STOMA SEWERS(ARROW � STORM SEWERS(p..0o•ND STORM LIFT STATION(..IMI1W) a STORM LIFT STATION(prapo.•,Q 0 STORM FORCE MAW ; ♦•• ,r,•,41. CITY O F MAJOR DIVISION POND NORMAL WATER LEVEL. . . . . . . 900.0 E A G A N POND NON WATER LEVEL OVERLAND DRAMApE ROUTE • - - . /- - -1:--- -.:- ., ___ - --T- 12---- ,tV1leiI' ''' • I It .• - -- ■, - 1 i 998.5/o i 6. •- ,.!/ la - / (DTRE4 .. ,,. ,....„, I 61.0/ .... .......- ...c. -„, i 79.8/ PLAN 85.0 61.0 ,'"/ Ns+ 43.1. (V .0 n . ..• -• -0,'' i .s .. . m 4 , .......‘ , iirou / .- „ _ . 1 • . ,..... ., -;',. - z i ‘\` 1950 ' CD 85.6/ ,..cit. ', ...-•I* / 'G' / en" .....,4T.. ?4.0 e ••• - • ,,,•,,,-a. / - c7/0 • • 70.4/1 jr, ui.0 . s 72.0 I . . v,./ / 1NUe r ttt.` ;7A \ 64 .8.10°'CD 80.0/6910 le 1-- 4,, .. 0. / t- .,e•- i , / CD. z..,. • ,,N36.4/ ,.- crji 07 t 08.7/970 .1..- <--- • / / •21 C70.4/80.0 265 180 :-.."-1 ,. 2. 18 I' - -- - 64. 4;.41r7,-.4p i // , ‘71.. / / 697:)70.0, ,,i;<//\ •••. / /••••. :-.0 , •' -1-draig2, - ).„,„ , . , (,) .. 9 ® • . 60.• (' e/ • / it) 234 ,/. . •4.8/65.0 1'. /9. \ 1).LLAS et j .... N,-••• / ',. 4/74.0 staff RA.III A QM. ....-4• ••.....,, r 950 I AP C: .• LAD) k f! •CK,1/0 'r : ;. ;E °.f7r:AirOIEF (Li _____;.__1.,. .,116sic ,,..14.. 411.Q.0 z '"- i 111, 71.;_ 71.0 . t„ 11"741111114111 a a ....--\ ... CD • .:____:. !- -647.P.''' ■ -9 :fry.)'"?,P10 ' Ijcs;-,-1- . Fft ',... . or, . .13_LAc -PO) 3. 12,s S-C*71"t.4. 4 ia..4,;?413140.,. C --Tr.---. . 7.- • - !--- -• ' Sii...} ..Ye'' 41g) IA •In 1 .1.:-- .67-4v gi.:. : 1/4eef.F,-L. • 4 1,7 . ,.-.-'.1..X•0..i.1,,,;,..c<1 ■7 \63.0/,• A 0-ArP-K A N K 4- • ;.s1/1110 Ms.,vik.,?., .A:-.TA 'ITAPP 410 la, .--; //4";1 (...` - WOODHAVEN jegf4,6: ii, *I I4, 1 ,:d- •E KIP/It ..‘<°- PARK ‘AkWredi'iitimums 4 oleo_Air :Alm lig)'I' - Jsco 4,.. ,,,,,,,\`) Avaisimair- „, ■••■421, urrde, li , - , m -..••••'' 1, "• PI' Nei ••■ Ali .?"', 9 'Rug. e P * 4ED.A'al 44 4, - 0 on. _ , .„\ .:?. 4.,.... .. -1 a Ail_0.,•,,ge.trAll, r \\\ME t'q "44'.- IS al;*"VI" era 1.4.1 r; ti‘u. • . 1 4H 1 toas-nuirnie o. 1111411111 .. ,, ./. , . i . • PROJECT SITE . • , . FIG. NO. 8 • . , . WATER DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM . CITY OF • --- 1 , • EAG ----3 ---_.2 . r .- . — _ - fir"[ Ii_..�s . ,_ •. --•-- – -I- . JK ' f N0. I 6 ./ 3�" T . ketropolit�an QWaste./ �, �� N ;ontrol 'Comm] �siq- �,� ~' „ Seneca „Plan/ .1/, ` �4 W-A 7 Ps<36.-• C -D1' , , . ! �} /t, , , moo / 36,t j ...,.�• INDUS I �AR � y� "� `v/ Ito 4 r �( .1 1 f,�� t I •l = .c I �✓ ,' 4 t 2" \ETA _ N p,,,Tr !"'� f ,:_ rl�• K _n 1��.. tl, ; 1211.. ,O -� W . : ,tf4A f 12 ' , CK X41 1 /, G.� UI�LLAS _ ' I _ �: _ �# ��' i �� T AGD // GAN ME R• CE \ 1 ,. t►`�• , l :.ILL i, ' LAI tHOV •_ ~wogs. �+•-,R- •• 1' , . i -;e rM.�AX,.• >< c r • CrC . ; - 'BLACKHAvYK :� '�� '\ , �•� :" f',7O► ' _ PARK ��•.��'•�'� Go•, �. � vl r. � � �sfi�'.`'"-'''' � x- 111/ ��• . =- ` / ��� WOODHAVE,N '� "—r r P/ PARK— iii rii: ti • \V� It • '44i �1 1 \\ /. . m_ d ,.�.um�- • R I I I ■'i► rn..�.�p3�y� ;,`�: 1 .:t i.,iK'-r7-11 1 I F•■�{—,'J^ Y- •1'f I fi- . \1-{"fTIT,�--� I I c'nf 1,T \ ` '�c r ', PROJECT SITE FIG. NO. 7 . SANITARY SEWER TRUNK LAYOUT CITY OF ' EACH A ; ' . 1 t t 1 O2 N 1 1 3 C 1 1 l i 1 l • < 1 {y 0 .,::::•....1........1.....r.":::::::::::::::::.:::::::::-...:-....!.1.......•:.,..... .........;:::.'......1............ ........... ............, ..,::,::,s. s s s :•:::�Inc ~ * ;,�,. • • • '.* ••4411.44.1i:•:•:::.,-V,...'...'...'—... .••:•••:".t:**, .z.:4. .littt::::. ,"; 4:: . ..0..........:•::::::::: . 1 :`,:ti: 'fit;::• J/ _ v 1 �:; $ arc 1 •.v; w j: •::.. •• :y::f' F 1 1•: : •.f� : •:.:`; •iii.•:`;��{ Q Z _L a ........% — o :. - • a: 'Vii•; a. t' :''4•':': • lI ;�I:_;i: ::Oi' • ,ir•,.•. , 1 :11 ::::::::::::::::::::::.:..:.-- i :,....404,..: - \''' .4 %`',. ...iii:::::::.'". ' *::..:4:. ...::. .::•:::: /:::: -'s,..,,s, co <V \\ to r`''*• t m W I +tl • �� � 0 •i Agenda Information Memo May 15, 1995 Eagan City Council Meeting E. PRELIMINARY PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AND PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION - INDY LUBE ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: 1. To approve or deny a Preliminary Planned Development(Indy Lube Addition) consisting of one lot on approximately .6 acres for a motor vehicle repair facility located on the west side of Pilot Knob Road, north of Duckwood Drive, in the northwest quarter of Section 16 subject to the six conditions recommended by the Advisory Planning Commission. 2. To approve or deny a Preliminary Subdivision(Indy Lube Addition) consisting of one lot on approximately .6 acres for a motor vehicle repair facility located on the west side of Pilot Knob Road north of Duckwood Drive in the northwest quarter of Section 16 subject to the six conditions recommended by the Advisory Planning Commission. FACTS: • The Advisory Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on April 25, 1995 and recommends approval of this Preliminary Planned Development and Preliminary Subdivision subject to conditions. • The applicant agrees to the conditions. BACKGROUND/ATTACHMENTS: / Advisory Planning Co is ion minutes o page =y3:(througl23t0 Staff report on page�' throughh� Page 17 April 25, 1995 ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION INDY LUBE ADDITION - PRELIMINARY PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AND PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION - MET-CON COMPANIES Chairperson Miller opened the next public hearing of the evening regarding a Preliminary Planned Development and a Preliminary Subdivision (Indy Lube Addition) consisting of one lot on approximately 0.6 acres for a motor vehicle repair facility located on the west side of Pilot Knob Road, north of Duckwood Drive in the NW'/a of Section 16. Project Planner Ridley introduced this item. Mr. Ridley highlighted the information presented in the City staffs planning report dated April 17, 1995, as amended April 25, 1995. Mr. Ridley noted the background and history, the existing conditions, and surrounding uses of the subject property. Mr. Ridley noted that the developable area of this lot is limited, that the size of the building footprint is also restricted by the required setbacks from the public right-of-ways on three of the four sides of the lot. Mr. Ridley further noted that the City Code requires a 20-foot wide landscaped green area between the parking area east of the proposed building and County right-of-way, which may include a 10-foot trail easement granted to the County. As proposed, the site will not meet this 20' requirement, thus the staff recommends shifting the site development ten feet to the west. Bob Yochum, of Met-Con Companies, which is the general contractor of the proposal, spoke on behalf of the applicant. The applicant agrees with the 10-foot shift to the west to accommodate the setback from the easement as opposed to the right-of-way line. Mr. Yochum inquired about directing runoff from the subject property to the interstate drainage system as recommend by the City. No persons from the public were present. Member Segal moved, Heyl seconded, a motion to recommend approval of a Preliminary Planned Development (Indy Lube Addition) consisting of one lot on approximately 0.6 acres for a motor vehicle repair facility located on the west side of Pilot Knob Road, north of Duckwood Drive in the NWl/a of Section 16, subject to the following conditions: 1. A 2,100 SF Indy Lube oil change center is approved for the future Lot 1, Block 1, Indy Lube Addition. 2. The site development shall be shifted so that a minimum 20' wide landscaped green space is provided along the east edge of the site. No part of said greenspace shall be comprised of any Dakota County right-of-way or easement. 335 Page 18 April 25, 1995 ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION 3. Building signage shall be allowed on the north and east building elevation. 4. The site is allowed one pylon sign along the western freeway frontage and one monument sign on the Pilot Knob Road frontage. 5. The Landscape Plan shall be revised to incorporate a planting bed around the monument sign similar to that provided around the Phillips monument sign to the south. 6. The Landscape Plan shall be revised to incorporate similar plant materials along the berm on the east side of the site to continue the theme previously established by Phillips. All approved in favor. Member Segal moved, Heyl seconded, a motion to recommend approval of a Preliminary Subdivision (Indy Lube Addition) consisting of one lot on approximately 0.6 acres for a motor vehicle repair facility located on the west side of Pilot Knob Road, north of Duckwood Drive in the NWl of Section 16. 1. These standard conditions of plat approval as adopted by Council action on February 2, 1993, shall be complied with: Al, B1, B2, B3, Cl, C2, C4, El, Fl, G1, and H1. 2. Site Plan approval as proposed, in relation to the building setback from the south property line, is contingent upon City Council approval/authorization of a vacation of a portion of the 10-foot drainage and utility easement that is located along the south property line of this site prior to final plat approval. 3. The development will be subject to a water quality cash dedication. 4. The storm water runoff from this site shall drain to the existing storm sewer system in Pilot Knob Road or to the existing ditch system in the MnDOT I-35E right-of-way. 5. The Developer shall dedicate appropriate right-of-way/easement for Pilot Knob Road, as determined by Dakota County. 6. The Developer shall provide a copy of the recorded private ingress/egress easement. All approved in favor. ,73(2 PLANNING REPORT CITY OF EAGAN REPORT DATE: April 17, 1995 CASE #: 16-PP-6-2-95 APPLICANT: Phillips Petroleum Co. HEARING DATE: April 25, 1995 PROPERTY OWNER: Same PREPARED BY: Mike Ridley REQUEST: Preliminary Planned Development, Preliminary Subdivision (Indy Lube Addn) LOCATION: 3565 Pilot Knob Road COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: General Business, GB ZONING: Planned Development, PD SUMMARY OF REQUEST Phillips Petroleum Company is requesting approval of a Preliminary Planned Development to allow a 3-bay oil change service facility (Indy Lube) and a Preliminary Subdivision consisting of one lot on approximately 0.6 acres (currently platted as Outlot A, George W. Giles Addition) located north of Duckwood Drive and west of Pilot Knob Road,just north of the existing Phillips 66 station in the NE 1/4 of Section 16. AUTHORITY FOR REVIEW City Code Chapter 13,Section 13.20,Subd. 6.states:In the case of subdivision, the Planning Commission and the Council shall be guided by criteria, including the following, in approving, denying or establishing conditions related thereto: A. That the proposed subdivision does comply with applicable City Code provisions and the Comprehensive Guide Plan. B. That the design or improvement of the proposed subdivision complies with applicable plans of Dakota County, State of Minnesota, or the Metropolitan Council. C. That the physical characteristics of the site including, but not limited to, topography, vegetation, susceptibility to erosion and siltation, susceptibility to flooding, water storage, and retention are such that the site is suitable for the type of development or use contemplated. D. That the site physically is suitable for the proposed density of development. CR 3 7 Planning Report - Indy Lube April 25, 1995 Page 2 E. That the design of the subdivision or the proposed improvements is not likely to cause environmental damage. F. That the design of the subdivision or the type of improvements is not likely to cause health problems. G. That the design of the subdivision or the improvements will not conflict with easements of record or with easements established by judgement of court. H. That completion of the proposed development of the subdivision can be completed in a timely manner so as not to cause an economic burden upon the City for maintenance, repayment of bonds or similar burden. I. That the subdivision has been properly planned for possible solar energy system use within the subdivision or as it relates to adjacent property. (Refer to City Handbook on Solar Access). J. That the design of public improvements for the subdivision is compatible and consistent with the platting or approved preliminary plat on adjacent lands. K. That the subdivision is in compliance with those standards set forth in that certain document entitled"City of Eagan Water Quality Management Plan for the Gun Club Lake Watershed Management Organization" which document is properly approved and filed with the office of the City Clerk hereinafter referred to as the "Water Quality Management Plan". Said document and all of the notations, references and other information contained therein shall have the same force and effect as if fully set down herein and is hereby made a part of this Chapter by reference and incorporated herein as fully as if set forth herein at length. It shall be the responsibility of the City Clerk to maintain the Water Quality Management Plan and make the same available to the public. • fACKGROUND/HISTORY The George W. Giles Planned Development (PD) was created in 1989 without specified uses identified. The PD Agreement simply calls for GB uses. The two lot Giles Addition was platted in 1990. There have been no other development applications for this outlot; however, numerous inquiries have been made with staff over the years for clarification on allowed uses and required setbacks. ag Planning Report - Indy Lube April 25, 1995 Page 3 EXISTING CONDITIONS The flat,grassy site contains a number of evergreen trees that were planted in conjunction with the development of the Phillips station in 1990. SURROUNDING USES The following uses, zoning and comprehensive plan designations surround the subject property: North - Interstate 35E South - Phillips 66 station; zoned PD/GB; guided GB East - Pilot Knob Road/Eagan Auto Mall; zoned and guided CSC- West - Interstate 35E EVALUATION OE REQUEST A. Preliminary Planned Development Compatibility with Surrounding Area-The proposed motor vehicle service use is consistent with the development in this area which includes the auto mall and two gas stations. Motor vehicle service and repair operations are allowed via Conditional Use Permit (CUP) in the GB zoning district. Within a PD, a formal CUP is not required; however, conditions that would normally be placed on the CUP can be incorporated as conditions in the PD agreement. Proposed Use -Indy Lube is a chain of quick lube centers that opened its first store in 1986 in Indianapolis, Indiana. The corporation now has 21 stores in operation and is expanding throughout the midwest. In addition to full service oil changes, Indy Lube also offers other services including transmission fluid change,differential fluid change,radiator power flush,and air conditioner recharge service. Indy Lube provides a drive-through,no appointment service for customers who spend an average of 15 minutes at the store. A typical store has four to five employees working at one time. j„t-The developable area of this lot is limited. In addition to the small size (25,000 SF), the size of the building footprint is also restricted by the required setbacks from the public right-of-way on three of the four sides of the lot. ,23 Planning Report - Indy Lube April 25, 1995 Page 4 Site Plan - The applicant is proposing a 2,100 SF (30'x 70') building that includes three service bays and a mall office area. As proposed,the building requires an 8' deviation from the standard 50' setback from MnDot right-of-way. Even with this deviation, the proposed building will still be over 150' away from the closest point of the Pilot Knob Road freeway exit ramp. Access to the site is provided at the southwest corner of the property through the Phillips site. Vehicles enter the west side of the building and exit the east side. Site traffic circulates in a counter-clockwise direction. Dakota County originally requested a 100'half right-of-way or an additional 25 feet of right- of-way to be dedicated along the east edge of this site for the future expansion of Pilot Knob Road. The developer offered a compromise to the county that would provide the dedication of an additional 20 feet(10'r-o-w and 10'trail easement)for a total half right-of- way/trail easement of 95 feet. The developer prefers this type of dedication because the City measures setbacks from the edge of the r-o-w not from the edge of the easement; therefore, the site loses only 10 feet of property for setback purposes. On the other hand, the r-o-w/easement scenario results in the City being provided only a 10 foot landscaped green area between the edge of the parking/drive and county r-o-w. The City requires a minimum parking/drive aisle setback of 20 feet along public r-o-w because this is the minimum amount of space necessary to provide a maintainable (max 3:1 slope) 3 foot tall landscaped berm to screen parking areas from public streets. To preserve the City Code required 20' wide landscaped green area between the parking area east of the proposed building and the county right-of-way line, staff recommends shifting the site development 10' to the west. This layout will require a 10' deviation from the standard 20'parking and drive aisle setback from public right-of-way; however, maintaining the 20' landscaped berm along Pilot Knob Road will allow proper screening and provide consistency with the Pilot Knob Road landscaping provided by Phillips. City staff has prepared an ordinance amendment for APC review and Council action that will define setbacks in such a way that, regardless of the dedication situation (r-o-w, easement, etc), the point of measurement will provide the City a minimum 20 foot parking/drive aisle setback along public streets. 02 ViD Planning Report - Indy Lube April 25, 1995 Page 5 Parking - The Site Plan provides a total of nine parking stalls. The City Code does not provide parking requirements for a quick oil change use; however, the nine stalls should be adequate for this use because of the drive-through service provided and the typical employee count at any one time. Signage-The proposed Sign Plan is acceptable. The applicant is proposing a pylon sign on the west edge of the site, a ground sign on the east edge of the property, and building signage on the north and east building elevations. Trashatecycling -The Site Plan provides an acceptable trash/recycling enclosure attached to the northwest corner of the building. The plan calls for the enclosure to be constructed with materials the same as those to be used for the principal building. Landscaping - The Landscape Plan is not acceptable. The plan should be revised to incorporate a planting bed around the monument sign similar to that provided around the Phillips monument sign to the south. The landscape materials proposed along the berm on the east side of the site should be revised to continue the theme previously established by Phillips. Architecture - The developer is proposing a building exterior including an "champagne" colored rock face block and an "executive grey" colored burnished block This two-tone color scheme should be complimentary to the existing exterior materials used for the Phillips store, car wash, and canopy. • Tree Preservation Policy - The Tree Preservation Plan is acceptable. All of the existing trees on site will be replanted around the perimeter of the developed site. B. Preliminary Subdivision Grading/Wetlands - The preliminary Grading Plan is acceptable. A minimal amount of grading will be needed to prepare this site. There are no jurisdictional wetlands on this site. Storm Drainage/Water Ouality - The Storm Drainage Plan is not acceptable. The preliminary plan shows the storm sewer for this site connecting to the privately maintained storm sewer system that drains the Phillips 66 site;however,this storm sewer system was not sized or designed to include the runoff from Outlot A(Lot 1, Block 1,Indy Lube Addition). Storm water runoff from this site can drain to either the existing storm sewer line in Pilot Knob Road or to the existing ditch system north of this site in the MnDOT I-35E right-of- way. 02 V/ Planning Report - Indy Tube April 25, 1995 Page 6 Because of the small size of the development, staff recommends a cash dedication for water quality mitigation. Utilities -The Utility Plan submitted is acceptable. Sanitary sewer service and watermain service are available to serve this site from existing lines. The developer will need to remove and repair a small portion of the existing Phillips 66 parking lot at the connection to the existing sanitary sewer manhole. There is an existing hydrant located next to the car wash on the Phillips 66 site that will provide adequate fire protection to this proposed development. Access/Circulation - Access to this site is proposed through an ingress/egress cross easement through the Phillips 66 site that will provide public street access to the Duckwood Drive/Crestridge Drive intersection. The access through the Phillips 66 site extends through an area that is wide enough to accommodate 2-way traffic leading up to the Indy Lube.site. The entire site needs to be shifted to the west to accommodate the right-of-way requirements for future expansion of Pilot Knob Road. If the site was shifted 10 feet to the west, then there would be a 10-foot strip along the east edge of the site that would be available for berming and landscaping. asemcnts/Right-of-Way/Permits - To allow for future expansion of Pilot Knob Road, the Dakota County Plat Commission originally asked for an additional 25 feet of right-of-way to be dedicated along the east edge of this site. The developer has proposed to the Plat Commission, a dedication of an additional 10 feet of right-of-way together with a 10-foot wide trailway easement. The Plat Commission has indicated a willingness to accept this compromise provided the City requested the variance. The developer and county have to negotiate the appropriate dedication. A 10-foot wide drainage and utility easement along the outside boundaries of Outlot A was - -- dedicated with the George W. Giles Addition. The preliminary site plan shows that the proposed building will be constructed in the existing 10-foot wide easement that is along the south edge of Outlot A. Therefore the developer is requesting that a portion of'the easement along the south edge of the site be vacated to allow the building to be constructed 3 feet from the south property line. The developer will be responsible for vacating this easement prior to final plat approval. The extension of storm sewer into the MnDOT right-of-way or the Pilot Knob Road right- of-way will require a permit from that agency. 0 Planning Report - Indy Lube April 25, 1995 Page 7 ' The developer will be responsible for obtaining an ingress-egress cross easement from Duckwood Drive to this site across the Phillips 66 site (Lot 1, Block 1, of George W. Giles Addition.) Park Dedication - The Advisory Parks, Recreation, and Natural Resource Commission is recommending a cash park and trail dedication. SUMMARY/CONCLUSION This small site is impacted by major thoroughfare right-of-way on three of the four sides of the property. The proposed use should be compatible with the surrounding land uses in the area. The plan requires two setback deviations that will not have any noticeable impact any neighboring property. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED To recommend approval/denial of a Preliminary Planned Development to allow an Indy Lube quick oil change use on Outlot A, George W. Giles Addition. Approval subject to the conditions listed below. and To recommend approval/denial of the one lot Indy Lube Addition Preliminary Subdivision. Approval subject to the conditions listed below. Planned Development 1. A 2,100 SF Indy Lube oil change center is approved for the future Lot 1, Block 1, Indy Lube Addition. 2. The site development shall be shifted so that a minimum 20'wide landscaped green space is provided along the east edge of the site. No part of said greenspace shall be comprised of any Dakota County right-of-way or easement. 3. Building signage shall be allowed on the north and east building elevation. 4. The site is allowed one pylon sign along the western freeway frontage and one monument sign on the Pilot Knob Road frontage. 3. The Landscape Plan shall be revised to incorporate a planting bed around the monument sign similar to that provided around the Phillips monument sign to the south. (,/,3 Planning Report - Indy Lube April 25, 1995 Page 8 4. The Landscape Plan shall be revised to incorporate similar plant materials along the berm on the east side of the site to continue the theme previously established by Phillips. Preliminary Subdivision 1. These standard conditions of plat approval as adopted by Council action on February 2, 1993 shall be complied with: Al, B1, B2, B3, Cl, C2., C4, El, Fl, 61, and Hl. 2. Site Plan approval as proposed, in relation to the building setback from the south property line, is contingent upon City Council approval/authorization of a vacation of a portion of the 10-foot drainage and utility easement that is located along the south property line of this site prior to final plat approval. 3. The development will be subject to a water quality cash dedication. 4. The storm water runoff from this site shall drain to the existing storm sewer system in Pilot Knob Road or to the existing ditch system in the MnDOT I-35E right-of-way. 5. The developer shall dedicate appropriate right-of-way/easement for Pilot Knob Road, as determined by Dakota County. 4-/ L • STANDARD CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL A. Financial Obligations 1. This development shall accept Its additional financial obligations as defined in the staff's report in accordance with the final plat dimensions and the rates in effect at the time of final plat approval. • B. .Easements_and Rights-of-Way 1. This development shall dedicate 10-foot drainage and utility easements centered over all lot lines and, in addition, where necessary to accommodate existing or proposed utilities for drainage ways within the plat. The development shall dedicate easements of sufficient width and location as determined necessary by engineering standards. 2. This development shall dedicate, provide, or financially guarantee the • acquisition costs of drainage;ponding, and utility easements in addition to public street rights-of-way as required by the alignment, depth, and storage capacity of all required public utilities and streets located beyond the • boundaries of this plat as necessary to service or accommodate this development. 3. • This development shall dedicate all public right-of-way and temporary slope easements for ultimate development of adjacent roadways as required by the appropriate jurisdictional agency. 4. This development shall dedicate adequate drainage and ponding easements • to incorporate the required high water elevation plus three (3) feet as • necessitated by storm water storage volume requirements. C. Plans and Specifications 1. All public and private streets, drainage systems and utilities necessary to provide service to this development shall be designed and certified by a registered professional engineer in accordance with City adopted codes, engineering standards, guidelines and policies prior to application for final plat approval. 2. A detailed grading, drainage, erosion, and sediment control plan must be prepared in accordance with current City standards prior to final plat approval. 3. This development shall ensure that all dead-end public streets shall have a cul-de-sac constructed in accordance with City engineering standards. cy2 (-/,r • 4. A separate detailed landscape plan shall be submitted overlaid on the proposed grading and utility plan. The financial guarantee for such plan shall be included in the Development Contract and shall not be released until one year after the date of City certified compliance. D. Public Improvements .1. If any improvements are to be installed under a City contract, the appropriate project must be approved by Council action prior to final plat approval. E. Permits 1. This development shall be responsible for the acquisition of all regulatory agency permits required by the affected agency prior to final plat approval. F. Parks_and Trails Dedication 1. This development shall fulfill its park and trail dedication requirements as recommended by the Advisory Parks, Recreation and Natural Resource Commission and approved by Council action. G. Water Quality Dedication 1. This development shall be responsible for providing a cash dedication, ponding, or a combination thereof in accordance with the criteria identified in the City's Water Quality Management Plan, as recommended by the Advisory Parks, Recreation and Natural Resource Commission and approved by Council action. H. _r 1. All subdivision,zoning and other ordinances affecting this development shall be adhered to unless specifically granted a variance by Council action. Advisory Planning Commission City Council Approved: August 25. 1957 _ September 1;. 1987 Revised: July 10. 1999 Revised: _Febryary 2. 1993 • LTS#s C)? STANDARD.CON FINANCIAL OBLIGATION - Indy Lube Addition There are pay-off balances of special assessments totaling $0 on the parcels proposed for platting. The pay-off balance will be allocated to the lots created by the plat. At this time, there are no pending assessments on the parcel proposed for platting. The estimated financial obligation presented is subject to change based upon areas,dimensions and land uses contained in the final plat. Based upon the study of the financial obligations collected in the past and the uses proposed for the property, the following charges are proposed. The charges are computed using the City's existing fee schedule and connections proposed to be made to the City's utility system based on the submitted plans. Improvement Use Rate Quantity Amount Lateral Benefit Water C/I $25.50/if 115.26 ff $2,939 0 Water Availability Charge C/I $2.745/Ac .574 Ac 1,576 Storm Sewer Trunk C/I $.076/sq ft 9,459 sq ft 719 Storm Sewer Trunk C/I $.04/sq ft 24,987 sq ft 999 Total gag 02 '17 7 NDRfir f2' NO LA ' v V o II - ; ETE ST. ,� W OR. ' 0 1 1 � 1 P1 : ;� IQfARICE < vi if- ° CTI PT. Y J I YANKEE DOODLE ROAD ' JII 1/ _ Y. I.61 1 WATER II � i S# 1� • �R TOW ' TREATMEN� 17.- � �' 'a. 1� 0 �o� I FACILITY ® a�C Y ICHT• ��, '�' a :�, i ` Cmr �, lj MAINT. ` y�,,. �` i FACWTY `� �® /at iir cr1 y ROYAL r N I WA OAK CIR.cL DUK HILL ` CET ROAD LANE . �' • 1 1 �o rP0 , CT. [p� C La o w 1� CRESTRIDGE LA. ..-0 �.A A 0 LN. J BR., .P m •• �e A r w V ^ ' _. r 7� U -I� A ' ~ s COVE 7 � • FISH STA. ill i1 CE ENGLERT L '!E -- 1(:) 1 T. u `•br ROAD 1.. SH K; < x L.BL o .ACT. ;� 7. ZAC,r�hq�� Qa < ��' C CT. 3,-.' y R. . E. B Ai.HAW F PL PV B_ ^ 4-} C . i GE r �4' yy_' BLACKHAWK. -� �` ,� g I Z "Q `,may r ' .y •. • 1 , .Z'J :PARK r1 c N% , u l V KWAY SII •. • w rcTRFST 1 ice; . •' ROCKY.. N• � AVE. • �o L it K CUTTE 1 R°' `� LqT ft ti . i p O �cool 7C 5 ROCKY �' ?+r , j. '� r pp�••f 4., �, 1MJRPHY 1 . • ERwOOD I DR ' _ C d _ DE_ERWOOD_ DRIVE COfTE TRAL a occs �NOOO 1 HOS ORO 1 HILLS 80 71 `/ fBERRY 1AN AR k 1 2. SKYLARK LA. Llt PATH EE r . 4� 1 sit p0,.1,, r+r. ' CT W••D+ ._ �/ ell wf +.tiE�oowurac wAr KN 4 �. BERRY la r a < G 1 4 •WC A, A ' I•. l' • -4. e. , ....t. 1 1 TI/I. 1 I oam IpR 4 ~ -+ 04°-~(�W�p�L I.A. 1 /7 INDY LUBE ADDITION it ,',la+,'fF :T "• a AP y.. �, bra �. • alias - •_ .s� •'•� 5n•h 1'. �.�� •:tai z!4•�-�;i;.�. ip • COMPREHENSIVE GUIDE PLAN jtl .; ;: Jz,..;. • 1 GB General Business au1 , D4115 0., 1 4 LS •- L. ti.,4„,„ joit $ .:'. 04 0 • WESGOIT ••. ......g: 1! 1I 04 111:11 Bill .}•,•• D-I a • ' .' ,,iiii•' 4:41..nu( IIttect A (r�' .:.;Ft• .po_ • ZONING °�,° , Ia1 ;_ PD-GB Planned Development-General Business "', ul l = ►. = /1 ' veor Om. o r 1� • ;,•��Uii7 R-2 .Vag • ;Q I •'411;:d....i L' IleOr• .4;` tai;:_ li:; " ;4 I lae. - � ,,,i.:i =E tz i I1 .•11 • , I . _ ":t- 1-••;`ass"" • rte+ 'I ,1 MOCr � %mil per•.. ...._� .1i1 1 'tl•r1 _'-_'e-'- PK < 1.7� NI IIIIIIIIIIiI ' o 1 ayr4u,k. ..'!';e vir {r .a4vF�E 'o . . -tea INDY LUBE ADDITION (.. ..)456 �• �r Z r rt C i 1! c 1E 1 qiitiji ;' ' Ii ■ 3S a if IIJ I 1 n1!'II1I'1!.1 1. . n''1 l Ir 1 .1 h' i i I i 4. >a . 1111:111!iiffiri 11 ii! A9 II oil Z � J ii hi I l ll i ! 1 1 II 4 , J = ' — —' —"' — .. . I 111. I■1III - — _ == 1 i t / /A-Al'e ' y� i. •}: `Fib'`;�1 ``', •4;,. ......71.%'•7049? '�`�+x��}�,-y�'"�nm��J�.�f,�u��-V.�.�/Q�}� •���y��. ��,+\JAR' WZ..,, \y'��! (rey''•'� w0��i,,��'_� •4�Sn� � bigi?% J a:� "- ..< ",1,' `. .r... . ••Itt...,ey{ i .%//i: \i: � `-,,..k.i..r`'1 •'2 ter• •j- .��r�w•- !�• r. . -i"57-:1./-r.. ,: *,...0. c ..K , .'- ��J(t . .+_ #6.6."'4,1..,i 71 'r t b ` L. .r_i":- .,s. -�� f;}=4'ris _7-t5* .''?'••a bho .yi n r• i^ - a' "4;''r :•� .w` � . ,v. - -:v=;`3- 'i'r-:-+ S x•71 �f • At, 1of R r'.'::..•w.. f tk;k-:. .� ,nlil� "•%'' .r.;t\ 15 iy 4' .'011/1;.,y�� y. 1�;; - ---:;--...:=-„ f Ilj IP . ,?; } J V $ r ti -L i' - -; 1 till ! Y I 1 . c) g 1.,..„/ r 9' L ' e I:I I g . i� 1 e z 3 c� w ._... �.\i1J i I - t ui : hill l J j 1 ! Y. ! ! g III ;e4100 aeod HONE! 1071d 1 full Of,p ���tag . 1 _i gall thin; ____:„........—........7.,...........„ Ns ,2' / �.�fy \ ... ■ti {n „• �� -, l . —• , L SNIMMIIIII`� ' 7 •°! te, ��'� •� r•. •�2 --` •rte o / , r 2 , •1 2/"7/ cal s 411A \( ( / 7 5'/'• N. N. et \\ ."a.1 0/ i cl ;iv \\ Y JIWI - ' ! 1 \\\\ i •a 1' o iii 1 ' y• I Di , °.: . ° — L) / 1 4 1 ti 111 i\' . . v. s h [ I\ it 0 Vt % 'JO( Si '.1:... 0 1._ . I Lc---1 \I \\ , ,. ,,Ti 6 , i , N > \\ .1 0 . \ ‘ 11 , ii. , N ' "'""t• --r-i-N 0, \\ • \\ :It , __.. ...._. N „ • \\� �\,.\. I ri- \ ..„ ... s. s^ `J CD A 7 AZ .... .... ......■........-........ .... • C2CP ii. _...................... ... . .. . .................”............ _. .. 11.I L.....4: (1 II; • : ii....;:iil N 1 (P ,L ti. - -i.-1 :iii ; s I , 414 I i — 1, 1. tel e 2 .! c� .8 li u L..._ .4 )1lr( 1 A I I ' 1'I , Mil IA ! CIVO8 8ONN .L0lId gnu - / •.YW a LL.i�I \ , • • • . . ▪ 1\ ,......_ ......•....... k.q. .. fi , •1111 I. I ili 1 •--\1e•-- - • .. I ' 1 I 91 = i I!#j;t - s ; P Of 0111111! 4,i 10 111111111:11 ' d r _,.. dji • • Ili 12 0-110 ith li 2 • g Xs la 4-1 I 19i . lir* 6 illilkh. 14 ti It! till 1 --- __ a y 4. 4 k: 4 .ii.L.. . • 11 I • 1= n r U :? �. N :\SZ IX ,, rii. ,... .... A 4.11 t i . • AI [ Zri"?i 1 \I- , M 0 tij't 12 II II: \ i i v ., .,..- , : \ 1 k • \l �� --- '. W Q . \.. g \ V \ \ n§ • 1, 7 \\ v V L . „ .1 V ��, 1 \\ ss.---, ,,-. i !rt. , ; I ,,,.....„ , , ¢ U .........` ,,\ \ i11 - e;• I S `\ ,\ r 0 I-,... , 2 �N • 5_3 • O } ` � ` Q ` :li _„ o al it Ja ka ,„ i 1 c ! '� do 1!1 it) rr ._ dal f+, CS .� a a r.�Wei _-f 1 fw, :, mil t ' A 1 • •a aJ. /„ • 11� - —*----7706 80NN l0lld ' 11 •• -=#�j• ■ ■ ------7-.-ti---== f y.o....--fffl.. �� �3✓X({t -��-.•...---.� .....—. • \ .; —_ 1 ' ; / i / , 7 .1 Hsi -.."'.. St .7 , • ' / " i 4p. u. /._ --w.---- -. ; / %i •/ / I /`p / / i I 5 ■ P.i i i ii. Ind 1 q \ ,be a al�.��a it 1 try;; t \ 1@ �!li!! ' �; 9.\tiliiiii.#,##-1 1 1 a '�' J �pd ` 1 ```� •/ /' iii \� 1 1 i 1 ' i 1 ,, \ \ I ils ' I Ili I \1,, \\1,. 1 :1�11—.1 F m. ' � - I \ � \ 1 •\ \\ `' \\\ ,\ \\\ /, to • IiIt _ \ I \ zQ \ 1 I f i 11! 1 g \\\\ ���'\' \, \.�'., - \ °emu 1 ! ������ — \ , „\ \ \c, \ y \ it +� I% \\ `,,\ \ c".\\,\\ \\\,, \\ \,\ �,, \♦\ 0\\\ / 'I\•`, N. i ••\ \\ \s, \ ' \ \\ \\\ \\ ''� \ '� /% .. \ \ ‘ \ , 1 -,. \ • ••• • ss. •„-s. • . ,„ ., „ kl-7.7... a 0. \,, \ �, \ ` ,. \ , 1, \ y\\\tai %1 ■ • I II cNorin tki B '1 st 0 ' \--1 151 is I to I QI h PI II IIP ail I 44 Z hIi � � G b f•' ''� s lilt,2. pis�s�L�Ynrti.�M..�_ - -- - mss+-�.��r+.....y, -A.,... "` +'• - ---' Tay; . .. --^, Na _ ._. .. _- �`_ ----7-71\i,A.),-.) - - 1 r-•••• ....-. -. —,,....1. f� .rte �_ aA ,i' 0 ,.,__... 1,,,,... .a el.--0--mils-1.1 Ve: -. % % I 7A R:t r. 1 ; i ' �t / I F; r r -4 rl 3, ' / 1 1 „ . it ji \ l �, G�d9 C� �'. ,► A. Ar 1 14, 1 1 �a i --‘,....141:' �� . / 1• t , II 1 r,.,,, . . 11 ri n 1' v N• \ . O..• I ! 1 {YY�m�y.tt 1ryry1.. IL :hi) \ `, \ 1 ` 1• I 1 tttiY' ll II ` I j I .. ;I 1i I.._, Ns--j1 1 \\ \ ; ca c' \\\' ,'•;`\, r 1 C. .\ • C: \ g 1 \ \ , \, , ,\\\\. \ A itfa •,.„. _=,_, \,,, 1` \,\ C . 1 r \ % Pi \\\\\ ,\\\I •, . , , Prt,t 1 1 ` 1 I & -` \� .. `!' \ \ \‘‘...\\ , \-■ N ,,,,t.k. it..„..N... ...,:...1 e s• \ � irl : g g t 0 1 i g - i \\.\\.\t-- \\. -.....c) p7 .S S h „ w r w \'\\\\\., .. i t I d 1 1 \\;... '\ ,N\\, ;....\.\..-.4:,:..,\\ �\I _ ..,.+.• ii; 1, . i ."s `\\� J \ .\\X .. �'':��,`�:.1 tip'••. •.___j (,. ......c..5-5. 7 ... _.. . ....._...... J! .4 1 144 1 a ° ! 1 11- sir ail ! 1 h ? I ��i, ' t 1 P. e NI w lo /II fit ie� I < z .52 cc5 s ` O. W j 1- 1i Jul Alit 1 1 • t r4! l 4 I li • MI gli it lit mull - mull --' a L s� �. lill 9y 11111111 -- �g �t : •it d • IE !I r ;aY alt: tilt ��1Eb8 11111111 -- 1 I I — PM __ • f' !111 - `��ilu!!Ilffl�lNl/&AY! �. 1 ; • =oral �I I�I id r■ ■r■ a Z mum - --i r 1111111. �!1 L J1••x• ea ;l!!III!!li!IIEIe�_ -----., alla�IIIII�III olle°Bair • ° ! •' It -_. -- p�p�/ / / / / 14"1- 111 J I r NE/ / / / / .I !!! CQC�/ / / / / / / / ♦ / 1111 __j r i I, 41 1 00 / / / / / piu -----i LI / / / / / 1 ( in / / / / / ■ ' _).. 11i:1: Ei� L : / / / / / . ■: :• iii EN I�I E - -- , / / / / / / / / / / / I l / / / / / _ m 111 , e r :: : I : / / / / o r■■■ : I�� .[ II IllE / /' / /�/ .IH. !MI-iii 111 11E : a ' I C= 4 Q IAA■ d h , Q • EE i 1i �. ( L �a 1 j J7! , ol. 1.1 1 i t I- * � ��. .. ,..410.11 ;IA' I`;��uL"rN �% BBB..•k; . t4 841.9 � :a3U� • r • �at3 COACH AN i FOX PARK _ � a t :4•I RIDGE S a �i" s�' Ns) ' Tiell/. � - DI ,J -'17a ... .::"" .•• C-h urAz _5 r•r, es901 r.829.7 1E{ l 3�A GA *ENS l' / v Inc • WarHr`s 03"; T,•P . ' wP. •�. TOWN E •CP•I2 4 I .A ✓"F•l C N CENTRE :93.0 • 826.5 IC �,/a: .5.0 2nD r . I7 H nn S0-0 �� 89 6 829.6 •H� BLDG. ti �ROY unI I_ If b TOWf, CE R E, ■i • 36' v:+imSr•• .1 I.C.Y`. ti 70 FIRST QP!2i • •27•. =Slli■r-1 �,u;= L.: -, ��• JP-661 \t 12.\‘V urTir-*-3 6- . 4S, „Ip:"Pe• lra8F4W 111147 6. ... "- il • IAV - /- IL,r,- y# CK r.15obma...a awe "i=ti 4{ F1 : • .0:.•'7: ' 'r5■r• ►4. 1■II �NA #1�'y's'*� 1 J i / - '�.•• : 9 ►�' L I I kliti:iti Ife.WAt‘e- -- a_.tifr:t , ' le =w1: -040.0 ' 1 . Apr p...,T1 . 141 2. 10 : 1.16 )I V it .,, , „ • ..,,,, _ , r 1. 4111;rni° 4,',4 ..*A). 1 �A =p. 1 --- /Al ' 834 . .. ' ■�/ CI Y rtniglit BLACKH J 27 .t+ ! Q: H . L Ta i PARK • K ' ' Ill • 4 ' `` � ` Ci nm p141 Mill : 11111 • PROJECT SITE _ - FIGURE No. 17 . . - . • STORM SEWER LAYOUT I MOM SNSAfWAt `'3 • STOW Mau aria) STOMA SEWEMS Wawa* STOMA LIFT LIFT STATION ad•*ip) • • STOW LMT STATION fppomeal 0 STOMA RACE 1NI1Yi CITY OF 11410/1 011N111001 ._. ..._. POND NONWAL WATEN LEVEL. . . . . . 900.0 EAGAN(VSfN MOWN ROM. • 9000. ____ / _I 4-0"‹(---1 :3 • , �� . v' M • 1p 1 I ) t,I 1.Is 1 1 'x'1.1 - Ai 1 � l r � HI! W14J 1 i'•2), i,{ 3 E ,g c O , jjj!� jL• , h r]i I! if ! ! I :: • ,. I€ �/ f: _�1id i. t4 rid OV021 BON)/ 107Id'� 1.. i �lg��gala LIII> ,.> / • _ -- . ..— - Ai l/ 111nngn(r01ItIlIIIIm�Qtly"W�:� I"❑ — -- • 1 '� _ .:• :: �� .'jam' -- — —i •. � I— •j ----)/ i :::::::::::::*0.0:: :::::;:;:NV;:i: tat, i h \ \ . ...**Z:.::;e::•"•:•:•:•:•:1:•:•:•: P115t _ ...., ......j . I r•'. :� 7yy:�Qp. .• :.:} fir t 1 ' R -7 ■\\\ ii.i:.:::::::T:;;;*::::iiiii:::::::::ti:::::4:::: i 1 li , - I I: ti j\\1._ C :I Tr a , . .::::::::::iliiigg.:44.......:.:.'1. ::::iiigiii: :a Jill, 4 V. . :, % t.t,t, l'''\'',.I.47::::::::;*::::::e..:...-': ito ‘3 1 ■•• is x X U ,I i \ ,,I> :::•:. 1‘.. 7\..::;:lit 1,,, ,j . ...\\.\\:\s. ::..,::::: i . z .:::%: _ gay ! I 1 1S ,... • Pa I -‘ - . lig " ♦♦♦ (Pi • t ■ ♦ `\\%\• Z YS� NN.4 it it 41 �� !Q h1 0 I • LL5 A t; :r � /0 - --* -- - - • r �� I k •41 i F.1. ;.-43,....„,„1, .1 T a� w■ Id iii, e* !iI ! t�i-i I _ ilLli: ,! It• • mew 80N)1 1071d i' i � .. — 1:11 1 II • 7i 2. , f - — .. 7/, — • .. .. :, . • '° `� . • 7. i ce' F . 1•• , = •r .,� - „`•• :•:i�:::: •'�.::'r: :'ti •:•::::•fly. •i . .;:::::::•.:.:..:••:••::::i.:...;::.:.::::::.::::: :.::::::.:::::::::.::.::::::::::::::.::•..::::;:::::::1:I'10.1 il:' it•iiii•IN,;:liiiiiiiiiiilitil::::A .17.- i , -11 ,I, !,, . , \ 4:5 'f'. T1 I Hi' . I . i i d...t .N NviNiir -z,/...::,• i, ..I P 1 . 1. w 1 . � . G3 • I. \ 1• • x1,1"rri i , ..,..-714Nwl, I Illik\ . F - , • 4 5 ..:.:.:.:.:.:. • - cc• • N\ ''' i iii 1, 1 . 0 :.:.:.:.:.:.: . 411\ m . ► •\ç\•,,;,. gat: Jilt 01• • • Agenda"Informa 'onMemo;� • • • iviay 1 1995 aganr, iby Dune w,s • • F.' - isiti*J �; 'eY P .>5 i ► tD i IIIOPniF1N Rt:--e; ` u�`; �BRE I��` 4R`Y �aa�:�;�+ar -sr�r, "•S7.•gr yak'. �R�-- �nstxz7s+fi�".t-, �s.�ct�-a 'r�,-•�•^.:-�-.�� :^-- �S' g, l E¢ ,AI:ON`_=lTA .O.E RRY s.: .firILEAGTAN'�.�V alit OVFICE PARk 2ND ADDI uIOI\T • ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: 1. To approve or deny a Preliminary Planned Development (Eagan Woods Office Park 2nd Addition) for a 52,248 sq. ft. office building, a 9,623 sq. ft. training center, a 9,250 sq. ft. restaurant, a 30,000 sq. ft. 90-room hotel, and a 64,800 sq. ft. office building to be located west side of Pilot Knob Road and east of the Lost Spur Country Club in the northeast quarter of Section 4 subject to the eight conditions recommended by the Advisory Planning Commission. 2. To approve or deny a Preliminary Subdivision (Eagan Woods Office Park 2nd Addition) of 30.95 acres, four lots and one outlot, located west of Pilot Knob Road and east of Lost Spur Country Club in the northeast quarter of Section 4 subject to the 18 conditions recommended by the Advisory Planning Commission. FACTS: • OCB Realty Company, a division of Buffets Incorporated which develops, manages, owns, and operates Old Country Buffet restaurants throughout the country, is requesting a Preliminary Planned Development and a Preliminary Subdivision for the area south of I-494 and west of Pilot Knob Road. • Old Country Buffet will be moving its corporate headquarters to Eagan. They will be developing this significant complex over the next ten years. Old Country Buffet will constitute a major addition to Eagan's corporate headquarter community. • All the plans are generally in order and will require simply minor technical revisions. The entire complex is being developed so that it could be sold off as separate properties in the future should that be necessary. BACKGROUND/ATTACHMENTS: (2) /- Advisory Planning Commission minu -s on page €7R(0/through 9 . Staff report on page9CoSthroug rTh7-9P Page 23 April 25, 1995 ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION EAGAN WOODS OFFICE PARK 2ND ADDITION - PRELIMINARY PLANNED DEVELOPMENT & PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION OCB REALTY Chairperson Miller opened the next public hearing of the evening regarding a Preliminary Planned Development and a Preliminary Subdivision (Eagan Woods Office Park 2nd Addition) of 30.95 acres, four lots, and one outlot located west of Pilot Knob Road and east of Lost Spur Country Club in the NE'/4 of Section 4. Project Planner Tyree introduced this item. Ms. Tyree highlighted the information presented in the City staffs planning report dated April 19, 1995. Ms. Tyree noted the background and history, the existing conditions and the surrounding uses of the subject property. Ms. Tyree noted that the applicant is a development division of Buffet's Inc. which develop, manages, owns and operates Old Country Buffet restaurants. They stated that the proposal is for corporate offices and training facilities in a campus setting. He further stated that the proposed uses are a hotel, restaurant, and future office buildings. Tom Lincoln, an architectural consultant for the applicant, stated that the proposal is for a "corporate center" for Buffet's Inc. He stated that the surrounding property owners support the project. Mr. Lincoln inquired as to whether The planned development could be extended for an additional 10-year period. He further stated that the architectural standards of the buildings will match that of the Eagan Woods building. He further stated that the setback for the hotel on Lot 2 is only conceptional at this time and thus the applicant can wait for the approval of a 13-foot setback at time of the development of the hotel. He also expressed concern about Condition No. 11 regarding traffic signals and Condition No. 12 requiring the expansion of Pond HP-7. He said that if the applicant is required to expand the Pond then it should receive a credit towards its cash dedication. A resident stated that he is happy with the development but concerned about the drainage and whether the development will effect drainage into his property. Mr. Lincoln advised the resident that no grading will be conducted in the ravine thus it will not effect the resident's property. Chairperson Miller further noted that the applicant will be required to assure that no drainage problems occur. Another resident of 1427 Highview Drive inquired as to the easement to the south of the subject property. Ms. Tyree noted that there is a 325-foot wide segment of property between the subject property to the residential property which is owned by Lost Spur and will remain undisturbed. Member Burdorf moved, Heyl seconded, a motion to recommend approval of a Preliminary Planned Development (Eagan Woods Office Park 2nd Addition) of 30.95 C9/ Page 24 April 25, 1995 ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION acres, four lots, and one outlot located west of Pilot Knob Road and east of Lost Spur Country Club in the NE1/4 of Section 4, subject to the following: 1. Phase 1: Lot 1: 14.81 acres for a three story, 52,248 s.f. office building, A two story 9,632 s.f. training facility, Rough grading for Lots 2 and 3, Landscaping for Lot 1, and landscaping and screening for Eagan Woods Drive. Improvements to the existing water quality and detention pond. 2. Phase 2: Lot 3: 1.64 acres for a 9,250 s.f. restaurant and 114 parking spaces. 3. Phase 3: Lot 2: 1.77 acres for a 30,000 s.f., 90 room hotel, and 110 parking spaces. 4. Phase 4: Lot 4: 8.684 acres for a 64,800 s.t 3 story office building, and 302 parking spaces. 5. The following plans will be required for final approval of each phase: * Final Plat * Final Site Plan * Final Building Elevation * Final Signage Plan * Final Lighting Plan * Final Landscape Plan * Pedestrian Plan Aircraft Noise Buffering 6. The applicant will certify that all buildings constructed within the subdivision will be acoustically treated to achieve an interior sound level of 50 dBA at the time of occupancy Landscaping 7. The developer shall provide a revised landscape plan for the development of Lot 3 which will provide additional landscaping and screening including but not limited to a three foot high berm in the twenty foot setback areas to help screen the proposed parking lots. • Parking Areas 8. Continued maintenance of all bituminous parking and drive aisle areas shall be properly maintained. Page 25 April 25, 1995 ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION All approved in favor, except Carlson who was absent from the vote. Member Burdorf moved, Heyl seconded, a motion to recommend approval of a Preliminary Subdivision (Eagan Woods Office Park 2nd Addition) of 30,95 acres, four lots, and one outlot located west of Pilot Knob Road and east of Lost Spur Country Club in the NE1/4 of Section 4. Standard Conditions 1. The developer shall comply with these standard conditions of plat approval as adopted by Council on February 3, 1993: Al, B 1, B2, B3, B4, Cl, C2, C4, D1, El, Fl, G1, and H1 Parks Dedication 2. This development shall be responsible for a cash parks and a cash trails dedication. Easements 3. The developer will be required to obtain a slope easement prior to the issuance of the grading permit to allow the grading to occur on Outlot A of Eagan Woods Office Park 1st Addition. Storm Sewer 4. To prevent future erosion of the ravine the storm water runoff from Lots 3 and 4 shall be directed fn a northwesterly direction across Lot 1 and be conveyed by a storm sewer line all the way to the normal water level of Pond HP-7. 5. As shown on the preliminary storm drainage plan, the developer shall provide a storm sewer outlet for Pond HP-7 that will head in a westerly direction across the Lost Spur Country Club property and drain to the existing Highway 13 culvert. 6. A manhole will be required on each sanitary sewer service line to allow the City to inspect and monitor the sanitary sewer lines. Streets/Access/Right-of-way 7. The developer will be required to remove the existing driveway opening that is located fifty feet south of the Pilot Knob Road/Corporate Center Drive intersection. Q( 3 Page 26 April 25, 1995 ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION 8. The driveway openings to the proposed sites shall be a minimum of thirty feet wide at the connections to the public streets. 9. Site plan approval as proposed is contingent upon City approval/authorization of the vacation of right of way Lot 2. 10. The final plat shall dedicate restricted access along Pilot Knob Road except for the one street opening of Eagan Woods Drive. 11. The developer will be responsible for the cost to relocate the traffic signal poles if the final design requires them to be moved. Water Quality 12. The developer shall expand Pond HP-7 to reduce the flow out of the pond to a maximum rate of 21.9 c.f.s. 13. The development will be subject to a water quality dedication, adjusted for any wet pond volume that would be provided in the proposed detention basin. Tree Preservation 14. An additional tree preservation plan shall be prepared for tree removal occurring outside of the proposed development site, i.e. Lost Spur Property. • 15. Tree Protective Measures are required (i.e. 4' polyethylene laminate safety netting) to be installed at the Drip Line or at the perimeter of the Critical Root Zone, whichever is greater, of the significant trees/woodlands to be preserved. 16. The developer will be required to contact the City Forestry Division at least five days prior to the issuance of a grading permit to ensure compliance with the approved Tree Preservation Plan. 17. An individual Lot Tree Preservation Plan will be required for Lot 4 of this development at time of Grading/Building Permit Application. 18. The Subdivision shall be platted. All approved in favor, except Member Carlson who was absent from the vote. Ot3 lG/ >i PLANNING REPORT CITY OF EAGAN REPORT DATE: April 19, 1995 CASE: 4-PP-9-3-95 APPLICANT: OCB Realty Co. HEARING DATE: April 25, 1995 PROPERTY OWNER: Gopher VI Ltd Partnership PREPARED BY: Shannon Tyree REQUEST: Preliminary Subdivision & Preliminary Planned Development - Eagan Woods Office Park 2nd Addition LOCATION: West of Pilot Knob Rd., south of I-494 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: CPD - Commercial Planned Development ZONING: PD - Planned Development SUMMARY OF REOUEST OCB Realty Company, a Division of Buffets Inc. (develops, manages, owns, and operates Old Country Buffet restaurants throughout the Country) is requesting a Preliminary Planned Development and a Preliminary Subdivision of four lots and ne outlot on 30.95 acres located west of Pilot Knob Road and east of Lost Spur Country Club in the NE 1/4 of Section 4. .AUTHORITY FOR REVIEW City Code Section 13.20 Subd. 6 states that "In the case of platting, the Planning Commission and the Council shall be guided by criteria, including the following, in approving, denying or establishing conditions related thereto:" A. That the proposed subdivision does comply with applicable City Code provisions and the Comprehensive Guide Plan. B. That the design or improvement of the proposed subdivision complies with applicable plans of Dakota County, State of Minnesota, or the Metropolitan Council. C. That the physical characteristics of the site including but not limited to, topography, vegetation,susceptibility to erosion and siltation, susceptibility to flooding,water storage, and retention are such that the site is suitable for the type of development or use contemplated. . D. That the site physically is suitable for the proposed density of the development. E. That the design of the subdivision or the proposed improvements is not likely to cause environmental damage. F. That the design of the subdivision or the type of improvements is not likely to cause health problems. G. That the design of the subdivision or the improvements will not conflict with easements of record or with easements established by judgement of court. . H. That completion of the proposed development of the subdivision can be completed in a timely manner so as not to cause an economic burden upon the City for maintenance, repayment of bonds or similar burden. I. That the subdivision has been properly planned for possible solar energy system use within the subdivision or as it relates to adjacent property. (Refer to City Handbook on Solar Access). J. That the design of public improvements for the subdivision is compatible and consistent with the platting or approved preliminary plat on adjacent lands. K. That the subdivision is in compliance with those standards set forth in that certain document entitled"City of Eagan Water Quality Management Plan for the Gun Club Lake Watershed Management Organization" which document is properly approved and filed with the office of the City Clerk hereinafter referred to as the "Water Quality Management Plan". Said document and all of the notations, references and other information contained therein shall have the same force and effect as if fully set down herein and is hereby made a part of this Chapter reference and incorporated herein as fully as if set forth herein at length. It shall be the responsibility of the City Clerk to • maintain the Water Quality Management Plan and make the same available to the public. Planned Development: Chapter 11.20, Subd. 8, B., Determination. states: "In considering any petition for such district, the Planning Commission and the Council in the interests of carrying out the intent and purpose of this Subdivision, shall determine whether or not such planned development will: (1) better adapt itself to its physical and aesthetic setting and that of surrounding lands than does development of the underlying zoning district; (2) be feasible for the owner and developer economically to complete according to proposed plans; (3) benefit the community at large to a greater degree than would development of the underlying zoning district." • BACKGROUND/HISTORY In May 1985, the Eagan Woods Office Park (formally Ravine Plaza Office Park) Planned Development on 18.87 acres was approved permitting the development of office and office and/or hotel of approximately 199,000 s.f and 55,000 s.f. or 160 rooms on 19.1 acres. ci)R (.0 OCB Realty - Preliminary P.D. & Subdivision April 25, 1995 Page 3 At that same time Lot 1, Block 1 was platted for a 4-story office building on 6.6 acres and Outlots A & B for future development of office or hotel. Prior to the rezoning to Planned Development the site was zoned RB - Roadside Business Center. Later an amendment was approved which excluded the use of a hotel in lieu of approval of a hotel within the Wyndham Corporate Center. A five year term was approved for the of the P.D. which expired in May 1990. • A separate P.D., the Wyndham Corporate Center P.D., was entered into in August 1985. This Planned Development included the southern 21.43 acres of the current proposed development. The uses that were approved in the P.D. were office, retail and a hotel. - EXISTING CONDITIONS: The site is currently undeveloped. The site slopes 70' from east to west, towards the river. A ravine is located near the southern portion of the property line and ' a storm water detention pond and easement is located along the northerly property line. Specific sites within the property are heavily wooded. SURROUNDING USES The following existing uses, zoning, and comprehensive guide plan designations surround the subject property: North - Multi-tenant office building(Eagan Woods Office Park);zoned I-1;designated I-1. South - vacant, Lost Spur Country Club, residential and retail; zoned P & A & RB; designated P & CPD. East - Holiday Inn, Eagandale Office Park 2nd Addition; zoned PD & RB; designated CPD and R & D. West - Lost Spur Country Club; zoned P; guided P. EVALUATION OF REOUEST Introduction OCB Realty Company is the development division of Buffet's Inc. currently located in Eden Prairie, employing approximately 150 people. The corporation develops, manages,owns and operates Old Country Buffet Restaurants. They are proposing plans to move their corporate offices and training facility to Eagan. In addition,to the these uses they are proposing a hotel,a restaurant,and a future office building. It is the intention of Buffets Inc. to develop a campus where, in addition to their corporate ' offices, the employees can be trained at a training facility, be housed at the hotel, and operate their restaurant; all on site. The proposed P.D. includes four lots and one outlot to create a phased corporate campus. To achieve the campus character, the developer has proposed to use similar building design and materials as well as the effective use of similar plant materials and design of landscaping. Signage will also be similar in design. (..0 OCB Realty - Preliminary P.D. & Subdivision April 25, 1995 Page 4 Planned Development Land Uses: • Phase I1 Approx. Timing Improvements Phase 1 Lot 1 2.5 - 3 yrs. * 3 story, 52, 248 s.f. office & 2 story, 9,632 s.f training facility. * 262 parking spaces * Public roadway & utilities. • Grading for Lots 1,2, & 3. • Landscaping for Lot 1; landscaping/screening for Eagan Woods Drive. * Water quality and detention pond. Phase 2 Lot 3 3 yrs from date • 9,250 restaurant. of move in. * 114 parking spaces. Phase 3 Lot 2 3 yrs from date * 39,000 s.f., 90 room hotel. of move in. * 110 parking spaces. Phase 4 Lot 4 5+yrs from date * 3 story, 64,800 s.f. office building. of move in. * 302 parking spaces. The term of the Planned Development will be for ten years. Building_Architecture The Corporate Center office building is proposed to be designed as a low impact building, terracing down the hillside using the natural topography of the site. The developer wanted the architectural style to be simple,practical and elegant. The use of brick will match the existing office building. The basic architectural style will consist of horizontal bands of medium to dark colored brick, alternating with bands of continuous glass. There will also be an entry atrium primarily constructed of glass. Conceptual architectural design has not been performed for the proposed hotel, restaurant or the proposed office building,however it is the developer's intent to design the buildings in a way that will compliment the existing buildings and promote a unified theme. Setbacks The proposed building setbacks from Pilot Knob Road, Eagan Woods Drive, side lot and rear lot exceed the building setback requirements. The only exception is the west building setback for Lot 2, The required setback is 30' and the proposed setback is 13'. The minimum parking setback from public right-of-way is 20'. The developer is proposing setbacks of 10' for the southern property line on Lot 2,the proposed north and west property line for Lot 3 and the east property line on Lot 4. a �()°' OCB Realty - Preliminary P.D. & Subdivision April 25, 1995 Page 5 Landscaping The landscape plan was designed to meet several objectives. The first was to fulfill the tree replacement requirements for the Tree Preservation Plan. No tree mitigation is necessary with the proposed first phase. Secondly, the developer would like to create a focal point and a sense of arrival to the corporate campus at the intersection of Eagan Woods Drive and Pilot Knob Road. The plan was designed ' with what the developer is proposing as strong focal points on the corners of the intersection and entering into the development. The proposal indicates landscaping within the median which will tie in to the individual lot landscaping.— Additionally, an objective is to provide landscaping screening and buffering in excess of the 75% opacity requirement, between each lot and the residential use to the south. Finally,the developer proposes to integrate both common and unique elements for each lots.This will be achieved by using similar plant materials,but differing the placement and design on each lot. k Parking/Internal Circulation The amount of parking provided for the proposed development is adequate for each use. The proposed parking stall width is 9'. This is a deviation to the standard of 10'. However, during the entire preliminary planning and development process, minimizing the impacts to the natural surroundings has been a priority. By reducing the size of the individual stall size the overall impervious surface has been kept to a minimum. Both Eagan Woods Office Building and the Holiday Inn both have 9' parking stalls. The Preliminary Site Plan as shown is acceptable with minor street access will be provided to this development by connecting to Pilot Knob Road at the Corporate Center Drive intersection. This is the only access point that will be allowed to connect onto Pilot Knob Road. The developer proposes to remove 500 feet of the existing Eagan Woods Drive as it heads to the north from the Pilot Knob Road intersection. The new street layout for Eagan Woods Drive is shown to go 400 feet in a straight west direction from the Pilot Knob Road/Corporate Center Drive intersection. Then the street system will include a four-way intersection with public streets to the north to serve the existing development of Eagan Woods Office Park 1st Addition and a • • public street to the south to serve Lots 3 and 4. The westerly leg of this four-way intersection will be a private driveway that will be the access point to Lot 1. As shown on the preliminary site plan, the developer proposes to widen the existing street opening of Eagan Woods Drive at Pilot Knob Road. The proposed street widening will require the relocation of two traffic signal poles. The developer will be responsible for the cost to relocate the traffic signal poles if the fmal design requires them to be moved. The developer will be required to remove the existing driveway opening that connects to Pilot Knob Road that is located fifty feet south of the Pilot Knob Road/Corporate Center Drive intersection. (LO OCB Realty - Preliminary P.D. & Subdivision April 25, 1995 Page 6 The driveway openings to the proposed sites shall be a minimum of thirty feet wide at the connections to the public streets. Signage The proposed entry monument will be located on the north side of the entry drive aisle for Lot 1. The proposed sign is in conformance with the existing sign ordinance. The signage will be in the same architectural style as the building architecture with a base of medium to dark brick matching the building. The ground sign is approximately 8' x 3' x 7'. Signage has not been proposed for the remaining phases; individual lot devlopment will show proposed signage with each phase of development. Compatibility with surrounding area The development is located in an area that has been zoned RB or PD for commercial type uses for a long time. Three unplatted single family homes with access to Pilot Knob Road abut the proposed development. The developer is proposing a 20' parking setback and landscaped area next to the closest existing home. When lot 3 is developed the developer will be required to submit a specific landscaping plan shown on the grading plan. Every effort should be made to buffer and screen the restaurant from the home. The landscape plan for Lot 3 will need to show additional plant materials along the south property line showing how year round screening will be developed. • Another residential area is located south of the development (on Highview Avenue) and is buffered by unbuildable property owned by the Lost Spur Country Club approximately 320'wide. It is a steep ravine and heavily wooded. According to the plans submitted the grading limits are at the closest approximately 95' from the south property line, and the building and parking lot are located approximately 160'from the southern property line. There is almost a 450'separation between the closest edge of development to the rear lot lines of the Highview Avenue lots. The last phase of development will not impact that neighborhood. The proposed uses are compatible and complimentary to the existing commercial uses in the immediate area and because of its close proximity to the interstate.. Preliminary Subdivision. Ws The development is proposing a four lot subdivision with one outlot. Lot 1 is 14.80 acres; Lot 2 is 1.77 acres; Lot 3 is 1.643 acres; and Lot 4 is 8.684 acres. The proposed outlot is 1.019 acres. Tree Preservation The tree preservation plan as proposed is within the limits of removal for the tree preservation policy at 22.4% loss. Therefore, no tree loss mitigation is required. grading/Wetlands The preliminary grading plan is acceptable. The middle portion of the site is fairly flat. Along the north property line of Lot 1 is a ravine with steep slopes going down to it and on the south edge of Lot 4 is another ravine with steep slopes. 7Q . • • • OCB Realty - Preliminary P.D. & Subdivision April 25, 1995 Page 7 The preliminary grading plan proposes to locate the buildings and parking lots on the flatter areas • and to avoid any grading in the two ravine areas. The maximum cut shown is eight feet and the maximum fill is also eight feet. The preliminary grading plan shows that a 300-foot wide strip along the west edge of the site will not be disturbed. This is a heavily wooded area that will provide a good buffer and screening between the proposed development and the Lost Spur Country Club site to the west. The preliminary grading plan shows that a small amount of grading will be performed on Outlot -- A of Eagan Woods Office Park 1st Addition. The developer will be required to obtain a slope easement prior to the issuance of the grading permit to allow the grading to occur on this adjacent property. The developer shall provide a three feet high berm in the twenty foot setback areas to help screen the proposed parking lots. Erosion control measures will be required to protect erosion from occurring from this site into the wooded areas that will be protected or into the two ravines. There are no jurisdictional wetland area that lie within the area to be graded. Storm.Drainage and Water Ouality -The preliminary storm drainage plan and water quality plan is acceptable with minor modifications. The storm water runoff from this site is shown to be directed to Pond HP-7, which is classified as a stormwater basin on the City's Water Quality Management Plan. Pond HP-7 was created by the Eagan Woods Office Park 1st Addition by constructing a 20 foot high berm across the ravine located along the north edge of Lot 1. This development will generate stormwater runoff that will eventually discharge to a large wetland complex in the Minnesota River Valley west of Highway 13 across from the Lost Spur Country Club. There are no recreational water bodies identified in the City's water quality . management plan downstream of this development. Pond HP-7 is a small, steep-sided, dry detention. Outflow from this dry detention area is then discharged to an open channel which is severely eroded and flows through the Lost Spur Country . Club property, intersecting an internal road and maintenance area. The current site plan calls for enlargement of the small dry detention basin and conversion to a small wet detention basin. The grading proposed to modify this basin would result in the removal of 22 significant trees. The Public Works Department is requiring that the outflow from the re-configured ponding area be carried in a pipe for about 1,250 feet to Highway 13, where it will be discharged to an existing large culvert that routs runoff from the Highway 13 ROW - • under the highway. -A principle purpose of the pond would be to reduce the peak discharges from the pond in order to allow a reduction in the size and cost of this pipe. However, some (17/ OCB Realty - Preliminary P.D. & Subdivision April 25, 1995 Page 8 water quality treatment would also result. The developer has indicated they may approach the City to reduce fees - including any water quality cash dedication, to defray the cost of pipe installation to address the erosion problem. Staff is recommending a cash dedication for this site, reduced to provide credit for the wet detention volume that will be created in the northwest corner of the site. The preliminary drainage plan shows that storm water runoff from Lots 2, 3, and 4 will be conveyed to an existing 24-inch storm sewer line in Eagan Woods Drive. This storm sewer system outlets into the easterly end of the ravine. There is approximately 20 feet of fall in the ravine as it drains westerly across the north property line of Lot 1. With the limited flow that is draining to the ravine at this time the ravine is not showing any signs of erosion. To prevent future erosion of the ravine the storm water runoff from Lots 3 and 4 shall be directed in a northwesterly direction across Lot 1 and be conveyed by a storm sewer line all the way to the normal water level of Pond HP-7. With full development, Pond HP-7 will receive storm water runoff from 27 acres and approximately 20 acres will be generated from this development. The expanded Pond HP-7 will reduce the flow out from 90 c.f.s. during a five-year rainfall event to a maximum flow out of the pond of 21.9 c.f.s. The preliminary storm drainage plan shows an outlet that will be provided for Pond HP-7 that will head in a westerly direction across the Lost Spur Country Club property and drain to the Minnesota Highway 13 area. This development will be required to provide a closed conduit storm sewer system from the normal water level of Pond HP-7 to the existing .culvert at Minnesota Highway 13. The design of the expansion of Pond HP-7 should include the construction of a 10 to 1 bench at the first foot below the normal water level of the pond. Also, all trees that are located below the NWL of Pond HP-7 will need to be removed. Utilities - The preliminary utility layout plan is acceptable. An eight-inch sanitary sewer that is located along the west edge of Pilot Knob Road is readily available to serve this site. The preliminary Utility Plan shows extending sewer lines to each lot from this eight-inch line. A manhole will be required on each sanitary sewer service line to allow the City to inspect and monitor the sanitary sewer lines. . A twelve-inch water main is located in Eagan Woods Drive and this development proposes to connect to this line to serve the proposed lots. This development is located on the west edge of the City's intermediate pressure zone and the residual pressures are around 55 psi and static pressures are around 70 psi. The water main layout will not be required to loop to the north, west or south since there are not any water lines available to connect to. The existing 12" water main that is located across Lot 2 is shown to be removed and relocated to the new alignment of Eagan Woods Drive. OCB Realty - Preliminary P.D. & Subdivision April 25, 1995 Page 9 Easements/Right-of-Way/Permits-The development will be responsible for vacating the existing right-of-way that is located across the east half of Lot 2. The right-of-way will need to be vacated prior to final plat approval. Site plan approved as proposed is contingent upon City approval/authorization of the vacation of excess right-of-way on Lot 2. The preliminary plat as submitted shows adequate right-of-way to meet the requirements for future upgrading of Pilot Knob Road to a four lane divided highway. The final plat shall dedicate restricted access along Pilot Knob Road except for the one street opening of Eagan Woods Drive. Parks and Recreation. The proposed development is adjacent to Park Service Area 4. A cash parks and a cash trails dedication will be required for this development. SUMMARY/CONCLUSION The proposed planned development is consistent with the City's Comprehensive Guide Plan for development in that section of Eagan. The proposed subdivision appears to meet the findings for subdivision approval. Final plans will be required as part of Final Planned Development and Final Subdivision approval. ACTIONS TO BE CONSIDERED Preliminary Planned Development: To recommend approval/denial of the overall four phase, Preliminary Planned Development for four lots and one outlot on 30.959 acres for the following uses: The term of the Planned development shall be for ten years from the date of approval. 1. Phase 1: Lot 1: 14.81 acres for a three story, 52,248 s.f. office building, A two story 9,632 s.f. training facility, Rough grading for Lots 2 and 3, Landscaping for Lot 1, and landscaping and screening for Eagan Woods Drive. Improvements to the existing water quality and detention pond. 2. Phase 2: Lot 3: 1.64 acres for a 9,250 s.f. restaurant and 114 parking spaces. 3. Phase 3: Lot 2: 1.77 acres for a 30,000 s.f., 90 room hotel, and 110 parking spaces. • 4. Phase 4: Lot 4: 8.684 acres for a 64,800 s.f, 3 story office building, and 302 parking spaces. 3 OCB Realty - Preliminary P.D. & Subdivision April 25, 1995 Page 10 S. The following plans will be required for final approval of each phase: * Final Plat • * Final Site Plan * Final Building Elevation * Final Signage Plan * Final Lighting Plan * Final Landscape Plan * Pedestrian Plan Aircraft Noise Buffering 6. The applicant will certify that all buildings constructed within the subdivision will be acoustically treated to achieve an interior sound level of 50 dBA at the time of occupancy Landscaping 7. The developer shall provide a revised landscape plan for the development of Lot 3 which will provide additional landscaping and screening including but not limited to a three foot high berm in the twenty foot setback areas to help screen the proposed parking lots. • Parking Areas 8. Continued maintenance of all bituminous parking and drive aisle areas shall be properly maintained. Subdivision: To recommend approval/denial of the requested preliminary subdivision of 4 lots and one outlot. If approval of the plat is recommended it shall be subject to the following conditions: Standard Conditions 1. The developer shall comply with these standard conditions of plat approval as •• adopted by Council on February 3, 1993: Al, B1, B2, B3, B4, Cl, C2, C4, DI, El, F1, GI, and Hl Parks Dedication • 2. This development shall be responsible for a cash parks and a cash trails dedication. Easements 3. The developer will be required to obtain a slope easement prior to the issuance of the grading permit to allow the grading to occur on Outlot A of Eagan Woods Office Park 1st Addition. _ OCB Realty - Preliminary P.D. & Subdivision April 25, 1995 Page 11 Storm Sewer 4. To prevent future erosion of the ravine the storm water runoff from Lots 3 and 4 shall be directed in a northwesterly direction across Lot 1 and be conveyed by a storm sewer line all the way to the normal water level of Pond HP-7. 5. As shown on the preliminary storm drainage plan, the developer shall provide a storm sewer outlet for Pond HP-7 that will head in a westerly direction across the Lost Spur Country Club property and drain to the existing Highway 13 culvert. 6. • " 'A manhole will be required on each sanitary sewer service line to allow the City to inspect and monitor the sanitary sewer lines. Streets/Access/Ri ght-of-way 7. The developer will be required to remove the existing driveway opening that is located fifty feet south of the Pilot Knob Road/Corporate Center Drive intersection. 8. The driveway openings to the proposed sites shall be a minimum of thirty feet wide at the connections to the public streets. • 9. Site plan approval as proposed is contingent upon City approval/authorization of the vacation of right of way Lot 2. 10. The final plat shall dedicate restricted access along Pilot Knob Road except for the one • street opening of Eagan Woods Drive. 11. The developer will be responsible for the cost to relocate the traffic signal poles if the final design requires them to be moved. Water Ouality 12. The developer shall expand Pond HP-7 to reduce the flow out of the pond to a maximum rate of 21.9 c.f.s. 13. The development will be subject to a water quality dedication, adjusted for any wet pond volume that would be provided in the proposed detention basin. Tree Preservation 14. An additional tree preservation plan shall be prepared for tree removal occurring outside of the proposed development site, i.e. Lost Spur Property. 15. Tree Protective Measures are required (i.e. 4'polyethylene laminate safety netting) to be installed at the Drip Line or at the perimeter of the Critical Root Zone, whichever is greater, of the significant trees/woodlands to be preserved. r7 OCB Realty - Preliminary P.D. & Subdivision April 25, 1995 Page 12 16. The developer will be required to contact the City Forestry Division at least five days prior to the issuance of a grading permit to ensure compliance with the approved Tree Preservation Plan. 17. An individual Lot Tree Preservation Plan will be required for Lot 4 of this development at time of Grading/Building Permit Application. (_(2 . STANDARD CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL A. Financial Obligations 1. This development shall accept its additional financial obligations as defined in the staff's report in accordance with the final plat dimensions and the rates in effect at the time of final plat approval. B. Easements and Rights-of-Way 1. This development shall dedicate 10-foot drainage and utility easements centered over all lot lines and, in addition, where necessary to accommodate existing or proposed utilities for drainage ways within the plat. The development shall dedicate easements of sufficient width and • location as determined necessary by engineering standards. 2. This development shall dedicate, provide, or financially guarantee the acquisition costs of drainage,ponding, and utility easements in addition to public street rights-of-way as required by the alignment, depth, and storage capacity of all required public utilities and streets located beyond the boundaries of this plat as necessary to service or accommodate this development. • 3. • This development shall dedicate all public right-of-way and temporary slope easements for ultimate development of adjacent roadways as required by the appropriate jurisdictional agency. 4. This development shall dedicate adequate drainage and ponding easements • to incorporate the required high water elevation plus three (3) feet as necessitated by storm water storage volume requirements. C. plans and Specifications 1. All public and private streets, drainage systems and utilities necessary to provide service to this development shall be designed and certified by a registered professional engineer in accordance with City adopted codes, engineering standards, guidelines and policies prior to application for final • plat approval. 2. A detailed grading, drainage, erosion, and sediment control plan must be prepared in accordance with current City standards prior to final plat approval. 3. This development shall ensure that all dead-end public streets shall have a cul-de-sac constructed in accordance with City engineering standards. ( ).7 b --) • • 4. A separate detailed landscape plan shall be submitted overlaid on the proposed grading and utility plan. The financial guarantee for such plan shall be included in the Development Contract and shall not be released until one year after the date of City certified compliance. D. Public Improvements .1. It any improvements are to be installed under a City contract, the appropriate project must be approved by Council action prior to final plat approval. • E. ,hermits 1. This development shall be responsible for the acquisition of all regulatory agency permits required by the affected agency prior to final plat approval. F. Parks and Trails Dedication 1. This development shall fulfill Its park and trail dedication requirements as recommended by the Advisory Parks, Recreation and Natural Resource Commission and approved by Council action. G. Water Quality Dedication 1. This development shall be responsible for providing a cash dedication, ponding, or a combination thereof in accordance with the criteria identified in the City's Water Quality Management Plan, as recommended by the Advisory Parks, Recreation and Natural Resource Commission and approved by Council action. H. Mbar 1. All subdivision,zoning and other ordinances affecting this development shall be adhered to unless specifically granted a variance by Council action. Advisory Planning Commission City Council Approved: August 25. 1987 _ September 15. 1987 Revised: Jy!yf 10. 1990 Revised: February 2, 1993 • LTS#5 g 15TANDARD.CON FINANCIAL OBLIGATION - Eagan Woods Office Park 2nd There are pay-off balances of special assessments totaling$41,967 on the parcels proposed for platting. The pay-off balance will be allocated to the lots created by the plat. At this time, there are no pending assessments on the parcel proposed for platting. The estimated financial obligation presented is subject to change based upon areas,dimensions and land uses contained in the final plat. Based upon the study of the financial obligations collected in the past and the.uses proposed for the property, the following charges are proposed. The charges are computed using the City's existing fee schedule and connections proposed to be made to the City's utility system based on the submitted plans. Improvement Use Rate Quantity Amount Lateral Benefit Water C/I $25.50/if 255 ff $ 6,503 Water Availability Charge C/I $2,745/Ac 7.6 Ac 20.862 Total $27365 1 MENDOTA HEIGHTS 17)0 1550 1!100 1250 INTERSTAT • 2a I 11 1 D.. ....--- -4� I TRAPP ROA `^ •• . I LOST SAP W; m'• L COUNTRY E� CLUB Ill S BLV. • CORPORATE_CM ie. _EAGAN TRIALY 1 cie`∎ ROAD 4, 1 6� � � UI Y CENTER CURVE 'tit 8 - �_ X10 ..�..1L . / I i 1 '�h ) . . . ...: j... .............._" .R°CEVEM�[FJPARK ; 4 <ft4O: • RY / b !' ((( L II 1 Sai• .. � - SERV( 1 LUST I Y W 1 fit. 6m. S In/ Ay n u ff -L14( o Y - - - PLOT" 1�� - -j ���1. t KNOB& c "j/ W i - . .6.....1 126. u l OW,VEW RD 4 R . n '' •: ; i■ OWERV RD. d JOIA• ' TOWERVEW RD f �, �►I '• F , f Q l I ARRY a �C��.:,.%.. mao ll Oer: P ! I'.. OL4 ,AKS RD. 1 L . Nr . : 6 g R PAR ... I:il- MI IS is < gr 1 T . /w t ETENORI Mit n DR. ' 1 •' f rT ( Pr_I � 1 1 1 1 I 1 = T- �- TAMARAC . '� f au o 2 • �- BIRCH PT. o LR FF L./ PARK 1 y+ ST R I . i 0 ....�� l ....; IRONWOOD • „ REDWOOD lip. SPRUCE P - - CT_ - YNI EE DOODLE ROAD YANKEE DC PT. f� AR+REE Pt WATER ` t • 1D7 `.J- — I` t0w4, • t TREATMENO b .r ' • 1 FACILITY �`�'!► I ICHT d C 24 i CITY ■ FACILITY r P. '1 �® ~ 1 ' W �”' . \ al �1 _ ' EAGAN WOODS OFFICE PARK 2ND ■ 1, ti A. .....`,, -AGA --- 1' EA•A W►IfEI ' II ►��I! LOST ' •Ski/HUH Ark %/� . C' k • 8 RUI / wymoNau l WC `. /iiEni am.IviE• ' 'PARK ti ARCS Y ZONING • �= _ . E_ :. J. N_ ,.•.,TIi&IV ... __.11. v' 4-1' TREFR( ACRES 'I _- En M�• (Planned Development) Y . � • • •• gip '�� '1 •PD ( r �a JlL11 p d• ' I U ,e P' ` ��`.•.+► �111 scaoo� rr A I rz:. !�i'„' — A L• K PD +'L• � \ R'•I'-.-• PARK . •■ .4 \ \,,.. 1,- l p�` _ \,.`111 . •.. P �FIL ~ r. i , •11 S. .."/It i J a • R-3, y1 A. -�� ��w ��� ....... . ,...:._____....... ,.... ..... ,,, .,µ ::a.':a4 t n. r f!' PLAN 1.:•:• , ■COMPREHENSIVE GUIDE .: g 001° , . ; CPD (Commercial Planned Development). . -,4:.....:: 1 ip -aY. J caM. ft:• - -t\ }`..:J L f iwit " -2 _ EAGAN WOODS OFFICE PARK 2ND • r • I-- • 0 Er WIN - II BIBi ii QIU...., r o ECEOV ED I t I r APR u it 1995 • ! i! ltd _1 h t >. Ii •aaIEii tittlin QLI tt f` gi 40 � i 111 u - h i ?x;11 11• . iii ew . .� iil _ It tau Si:MY.101V) 1 • R��. un;'O :A ■Old.irr,u1"ar __ 1.11 1 di v • •"rr ronr aPI• HE_ r • N ' N 71'>•.�K uu Tiesr u a, -,,... . • • , I v I 1; �� I. t i ......Hi • •i t'' .1 i !- Q h� I il la I ` —. c i I S $ . P. Re II &77.7 Sd11-61:72 u7dS 1507 r' rr ..•�'• - .r MM 1 Nom rtOSa Qdm'NYOr3 °'� Hind 311S NOIlIaay NZ V° 'oul'na»na ,X I i,—,:w 'Num nu Aw erarm a n warm vd )Ial►d 3310 Sa00M NV013 1 V p• 1 �Or.r� r 1 t i ! 4) 411 i I tit' 1.....174:)- • 1 1 1 IA y V ihhh1Y11 !goo a 411-111 ... _ 0 .i.,, b . i• ,' I ...41 rl 1;w W$ ,_*" 1 w1 L i M 6 IS ii !Y fl-O __ ,,rYa flV 0 _ i u —i ♦ «• •� 11 V'S'O _ .u� _ __ n- •A • OYON 8OXM And lF.•__ , tr -- i fi =.mssi rr"S.d^l.:wu ..r..+r`l._ uL'r7s. 1 r - . .i G 1 . COS Sows!O w) _fns.■c.:.... �u�. '-"tzre; �. —._-.. ..°K Ws •i s Ie.i _ i•On'NVS'� __ Zr-61_•av'tl1' 1 e + ,•. .......0",.•I la 0 1114E I 6f- 1 ' J1r 7 /4 ;:i . ate,•... w..J' �� J �.. - .,1+ •�' _1 map—JJ ` I 7 ' I-j, F ;ri-f lJ 111111111 i QQ hi. I 6 44/ 11 *: !Y — id� y I1 °�Soil�, �► • ^ :`` r t�x�1 I}) Cry— I PE f .T r t`' �. A • �,�� Y„"� I) ,! Cam.= •— = t• 1 p. ♦ ` ' ',I ill '<i ' 1 i/-4 11Ni1 1 y 1 cf ; w �� ti; e f r il I VA, A '. ke <L' sy'C' :/ ,I ' / I oli •C: rri ' iv ..06 lir i.111.t.::_‘s„ ..^ 2? I t H.4.44.6 d I ri 1, kl . 1J 1 Y , / f i\ / di'. 1 ■, I / Q 0`'.-.........._A.....,s, .1 4\0 cit) 17""".........1 i i d . C� r Y. `� 1 r r.===/ , f:3 13° s 0 � C r / ( Q a , 1 Q. fl •* �/ -' fl sr •.ean:s all 1.., !. .:1 iind. a f1't ..... q .. VA SWAM 11110V2-• ....==... ='°" MEEIS ILR NY1d 3OYNiraa �e DNiaVUO NOIiI00V °NZ N . '311%10)P a ,� b '1 �: Ti ow ArmRew{OIII mom 1111 )I IYd 331440 S000M NVJV3 I V r i1 111 1 : •1 ® . 1 ! I i Il . 1lill 11!If 11 lig I • - Sri 111104 Whi h I . '' • , • It 'ON i+vs� i 1 OrON oONN irld 1 r- - — — _ wry _ 'y 4 f ' c_ ('o!so&M 1oUd) .,,,1E!'... __...,__ -.---.�-�--- I ,••+- I _lam - `• ' i _ koN-rem* 1 _ — - --- 1 _ a ~ Mir. T "` 9t !r .4., 7 2 - _T--� itAkire-tr. it 5@ A 2 / / 1 JIIIII! IIIII ill tR / .. 1 == j I IY 1‘ '= 1F_ �- ••. i I °fl. f ar ;7\f �. ii=[ \ i� I 1) It zir-ow. 1. ,,,,,_,...zri \_1..„„ii co ii �Nr r Y _ 7.7t_\,`Ip;ll✓1�\TI���I l . '/ ��'�`• �._' 'J , ,,+. alai ' `�.N,I k( .. ; , I I , „ � i 1I %, i rhn,• :14 / „I;(5',,141,4 I,/..,,f':,.•04,'i or ft- 5 is I wli - ‘. - //// Prie. i ileyrN ,,fr*1 ',.IB `4 \/ 1♦ 0 /-Yi ,7 I — ' 1r:I!1 %1. • ,,,ei iv i / / i ik, A •Vt.. 4k0,.•.4t", 9.--.',,,i T f•1, ' ' — ,-- -.:i.:, ,di it ,P ; + �, `�: ,�.r` �.�! 1 111 �iy. " )!•!!Igi el t,i. y ',IK. Z. , . X 4 la rlj%r r1 r".Sl r l �'~�\`�[��` �1�y� !' i j'- 7 ;Ii�ir�,r.f r%41i ' -.:,•:-.:w)1) • is j. nip',../, •-,,,,.."0."kz.".r.e:, \ ille444,x-_---..--.•: ... - sit, 4'1/(7 i y /IN lI;./.7,., ' vw • /% I I - At,ill j r i ,,,N . \.\\‘,.,\.te:. t /:. 4 ., , .•,....:,.11 .•( ilibkM.., .,,,, . ,per 11)1.1 ly \ ' •'''■`..'`:, :s l ' . .:- Q * . P -/, .4.,:. ,•:,...1„„..471,410, , ,•,:s,..,,,,„„,_,.___ .,\,..b„,1 r3 , ,, .,,,, 1 ,/,......../.2. ?4,,,.41„ ,ri ill ..._ • -*-'1 ,"--- ...."-.. s •■,\‘':"..S,V.‘\ :-...":=7::•k-1. \\■*`It. *//, ////#71,,--' g,Al 1.1111k,' 1.- �� q WSJ -" -1"���=mow - s fr ,�litie 9 �, {: \; , , __, , 1 c_ ____22 ) . ■■■� UMW= 3 =^�'� ,.-szmr:=.:='s �' NV Id 5311 nitn NOIIIAatl aL M m."44aAne b 1 ----'s` .M 7111Ia„!in ArM�1l1 art JmAlo[an'Q4 )WVd 3311d0 S000M NYJY3 C.) I +wry=��r�`�:.. r'�� ! Ii . r1 . . , .1 i ,. 1 Ilk i . El r_'_0-..- .- - _ If 'ON-'MY'S'� - - - i1 OYW! WPM lOYd _ o tau 80NM 1Otld) !• , I. PPP _� .__ "{ T • tt ,,,-t-�f-^-.r ,�,,,_ a___._a_..._ ,rte r r....ff-+,----p-�" I. y Z - IrkON•'NYS'J __-f4-j2-.---•.-- .... ~�� _ _'—�:� ,+ 1 Mini __ I L ._.- _ — — tiLw�-�= _ L`�' 'rte r 't.,i� b %� rt ;� nnnn��lu ': 51 n n n I — i� — � � f 1 ..- 1r.,_ e 1 I _ )l 1. ! I 1111 = %a$d4 k 1 ;'/ ' g 1 I ::::27 .L = ,_ pig .. 1 i�' �� 1 1� mini, , i 4J _y I C - 1 ,( � I / i I • /--). I ; I / ' Li 1 1 % 0, F (c-) , I— r . - te "."" M%N rlOSINNSI'NVOIN r *G'- dEl •� NY1d ONISVHd Nowaav a+Z • 3U 'amine \� b -� i= moans ir>w MUM,an mama•at )lard 33W0 S000M NVNV3 C.) 1• 141) , ii • • • L a 1 .• ` . if •0N •NY5.9 avow 80101 1011d .....- - i_— __ ___ ___ - - — '— - - - - - — - - a our,+n=+.m.. I I - i • •• ('OM 80NM lolld) .I —, term I v3y bits r•- -1unnnnnnnuu I 11(nnuunnuL I C] ►1 _ I L`LJ I / r = Bji 1 ., .1,1_ I !r _ A. I s� PI 1(ffTTO`, _ r \ � I `� � !UMW ' Oeulgi ill` - -- —. • ji--1 • ,-----:=7.:==t?' - irltalfinrATTm I G �` L_ I IP :. ; i I '1 ! N : _ __ __ • , . f \ fv� I tLJ ; I SS 1 I 1, : : )1 s — "i." — — 2 /k i `� C\, N I 77ff r j J \\rte\ / , �/ I — _ Ni V 1 ■ ii $ _. _ _ $ ~ I . t-\ ,, . ..s.) _ '1 , &____7 ........ (--)......., • • • .�...., N. Ha 1 IMMO Y•047NN111 9N10Y3 �`"11 r =wr arca Nr1d 9YA01�113d 33111 NOIiiaav Z •3a1.gia"n8 ZQ� = 4-12='= n,�■ra irw�Im■r>aw a1 inn=Td )IdVd 3011d0 SQOOM NVOV3 5 • J [I' . iiiilti.! • II ! 1 s i / !� t iiill aI Vi `g itl !ill!' II at i ahi� al �E1 1 ' °...° k°4 il ° _ ai 1 iv roN 14TS o avow eo.o lo'ld � tar sow love L—�+•**"'-- --�'T_� —i'l• • It'ON MVS 0`—— �'-- -'---- X11.n _ ® 1 � A,,iliffiliffilliii ICI "1 1 f d, _ I 1 p \ 2E-, .1 I -N .L....:: :•-- 1 1 It _ a- . , At :! 121. • = 1 i' i„._, - saoow _ _J \\\\\\\\\\\ Es\'\' ,e-,\N'..% , :\ \ (/ \ / '7, O' s: s „ 1 i „ 1 . 1,, ;.'■ N ) / `\ \\ \ � 1` \\; tip i ;i ∎ \ . •i • e I \ � • II•ii '• '\ ' • / / ! 1 ks..\\' . 4,14016: .- . . , I \. . ; , or.iiiiii, s.:" • 1---1— –Ced- ` I ° II o ' H ° ° 0 I ° 4 '�--�� 4 o O° I 0 g o o �WYYY� -- - r f` 0 °° ° ° r-Q 8 • J - ./0%Mi ni Y1093NNII I'011101f3 N I- • ° +•_ ^_"•'" _-9• rr = NV1d 3dIr3SONV1 - Noiiiaav aNz a.I%lama I = ='- manna ivy AffiW w on maw Td Nillld 331140 Suvvm NVOY3 ma s THUM iii '- !• I !- 5 • 9• ■ == !' a !i ! I ■ 1 i 0000000100a11HIMP I i i yt i !, f lifq �� I I I 10000000001001108800' 11 Id I Id w 11 id !d , iia � `9r i1 '9 �` o it �' ` �`R it `�g. `i � Q� `� ` 1 1 , lion ' II ail ! __ E pro a g I gt! �EIligii i 1 k • 4 1111111111131 IC '0H 'HY S'= QVOa IMO 10114 O30001:14113170E1000n--— — + I1 r - 111.1 ,<<' .1llpt� ' . --- —' — 'Oa BO101 1011✓ (y�,� if'OH'HYS '�..---iil . . ... L\l■f .111 ——I— I ;too- - ._�t.�r .—t: bc:c.os ! i • �:E. 1► ql- ^1 . !. • �I rani .:1 , 1 ,11! ! ,L �_ _ ._aR �b- 11• , rya I 1 1111 h I 1 i ( !. — I 11 0 11 ,� =I{} iliii {{�� [ —/gi . .ii!!! !!!1 .. !N!e•!?Ili! 'Jl�, 1 ', ' _ •� i LLB', 1 � V 1,iiii i!1 7 $iil Fig hlh l g! ! _ r 1i s 1 = I i = i v ' u C'-I<• 0 I5 ! 1 i of_: I-.1 - 1=,� 11+ 1#F 1 1� –� _� _ i i1 1 ._-e.�1 r+II1111 F. ► ;aE rte' p�j S uq -- — — ---- .r.��_ 11 • �r►� i ____ Q °^ LNY9r3 ,� wow le:'�, t ww•w `� it.-. '4.-*, k pi 1 i IT,1 !,1. , := - =i•r-'1 _7.: _til , it i 1 I ' ■ • ^� - �� E J �/ xs' ,� \ \�+ �I ��' *�f i1-- 1 _11y r` of 1 . I , p .!_1. • : • F$ ,_,..,144•1 !/': , •'_1 11E: _i i 1 - ,� �'•' 'I ' lea-1 '— -�R ;,4 .4c. <I ) 1 1 i -= "": -- 7: "" - . ' l `i I ' 1Zt' w� f � ' ! '�1. III1�1 1 i �\ I .w �� •`,# is 1 i/ , ■ .-'�I I ft/ i • —`� ti- '- , i Or I i 1— mil— — . -J I / < c • o ° ° o o o J ! o 1 , Oo 0 i ° 4 , - illiiiiesami_ I ,A0.-- to o00 0 0 0 Er 0 0 0 . (9 g 1' J r • MM : ,_ = •••�•w rioaawurt wrora �,. "' r--=t '= = �'• NIHON - Aa01N3ANI 33!11 N011laav wiz ."1 na»he `� b :I E = .Matra ow umwaw an a®n IN )Illlid 33W0 Sa00M NYDY3 co i g J a ! 1 l ® i:Brocol" - 1— ' ! t I `° `j �' • • 111013 I ! i ` • ili t i i t _'moo+b , \.,../-------I 8,, e ,� E !t+g + s ems, 9e , �,� �'it°°� ' w II . e� 0. b r o 1..'e�o� o tre' a q °,°. bet ° / ac 0,1) +° •e •b °°% iZ 441 ' 4:rcr,-r•-f-' I o o 00 7 ; e) Q 13 t,. 1 ..) I..' ”. 1 C 4,.,41;f 4"pi ° P° ° o u � `fir� , o o , d' / .° 0 1e ° , Ca il i � t °' Ve t •,.° 1 ` t S e d° °r 4 0 b b P e � a� e _ I S' , .b t3t3 1, II-Co. e o 3 • b J• -...0. ° b b Ise• b b 4' ilif S 'I.6 - b t ' da ii_ a-- ,4,t,14% ,o b y !i •_ 'b b b I, b b bb '6; 'e1 1 9 'e° �° r b e a ) 'd° b , °de' 4 i a, , b bt �� ,b b e , q�y01 d b re Ly,,,,, 41 \:c.'lecli 1 - i a-4.' ' -...t_t_...,..."..4„,...",...,.......),,k(73 .., 151.,› ;, 0 I _ 7 r-4-4147•2 ==—= - O«++�+ vlorawiw'MVOV3 I ' r��?'=== 2' H1AOS - AdO.NEANI 3341 - - • Nowaav wiz b • 'Q''i'u°H '` li '1 =;_ _ WAWA In unurAw an swarm vd )IUYd 301WW0 Sa00M NYOV3 I— i % . ,I; I ter° �iI. .u{ _---- -��� ,,�o f--) g • Q Q Q iI� & • 4.0' : L4 Q / , I 1 I - i i I Ii 1 ; 1 1 , _ t L._ ,, .4.___Itd,i;.,,,:j.,:i.•0......,. qt.!, I r • leo - n , 6 ----t,----.4 """"-'--------'--- 1... --140-14k1- -,i4p Ai t 1 A 1_, , t Jo ^� `6 a 4,"i�f o*I 4 d i ° 4 +9 01• °'• g f rr s Q� '+e,+ i'a b'oo le Ia' 1 1744:11 801 11. r, / i eb N + Jo; /16. • © ,, e + oq + � � f b b i Jo . ° +fie' � r' ,, Via,k- Mkt; it �— N to , Jo > Jo ref e a I 1e Joy I 8 Weill + . Jo % Job, . ,� e; ,, i Jo Jo Jo t e o ,•!6.. Jo 1 , Jo 'e Jot, �9 b ID is e '°eo• I d 'e ��+p .Jo 'o ` . '1%.%,, Pptie Jo ry.ti •.r r f 9' ( • ■ __ _ MU 1 wwtn tl1083NNIM1'Ntlatl3 ."""" " 4— L " SNOLLYA313 ONIGuU181YILLd30N00 NOIlIOatl °NZ a "vs-ming \\in fi ._ � . 1V11■�ns AY11 AYYI■■13W On 1■■EHINY v1 )idtld 301d40 SOOOM NtlJtl3• \ I E �` x. Asir ,;. ; \.; :A . \ A ■ • i:,,, . 4•1.11,-, 1 1 .!'ti 1.4.: . A., ,, \ .,. f 11 G f ., , ..,.. . t volt , 111E i 7 J \1 N t� �`�•l' F / W 1 11 r �a.�l ' \ \ �1 ■ ..*.1'l 1 �: • s e 1 . 1 i t i ,I!I��.'ti1 •� 8 • 1'��' 'I 1• a g y �: i, c• ./k ! �_ 'i►I 1 � II f'i'b •1i'R' li ;!)J II1 1R J ~ -;� W 1 • ■i-I W 1141,1-1 J ! it 1■ ■"` / I' J !iii I, 1 W t 1 ■•,■a I , W F 1111' 'i 1 I W ��: . ,f: .>•a:.■ • .J Ya'1 1 s... (,..,, 0 L c s.,',:--,----i 81; el; R,:or // ) g eui - . - _ 4. s...2.4 . ', "7... co''. , •s -../4., ■ / . -.11., L. _ , _ _. , i d. .__ . ,_ , c.) Is, b . � \ �I - , • -- • - - • .- 11,,to 3.0 m. I 1;4/ N ' "4,7 ' ----.4'''''' ' \\t' Allffl _ 1. I,; i)'. 2 = I Ill P Yrilie�` . , ,,,' 1,, , i ,,,,-,1 ; , ,,,,• .. • • . , I " I, 1 . ,, , . :1g z ,firs ,,' ` �l, I1[ I WA 4 i/ I so 1 , R r F 8t1/+I die d6+ Cr) 10 r ZOig Q1.1.. i t to -- --- — + I I . I I 1 I U i ii . . ,�r, _11 I 1111 I I i17 I:14 �:,gEt ° II 1111111111111111 ii. • I :�z Tc`V ;)c �_��. o I i �y 11 I II1II1IIU II1�II >� I I Lo .:, 11111 1111111111 C.I11.111,.,i�_ - ! 4 2 ,;11 kl- I I a . I 1►I I II . ail I ii 11 8 An I I HIU a R: � I "):)/ 4' I ,g; �1 ,�, I ; � i= I , • �` I I II 11111 II _ r--� ;' :� ' 1 11111111 11111 41a- .111 II1II1IIIIIIIIIIIIII1111111 ` . �� �b �y III 111111111111111111111111111111 1 N'7 J. Es. 1 o 1 1,. ..\--3 . N / � N 08 CD Vi _ � _ � - a Y,,11 , TI II O li ii it=u IS 2 H=11 11— ` cFi E H=11— ~ 3 111 r13 0 Z i !IAN I; vj �,1 � � k. ��-I u 1 2 a !'1 i F9 II11I i!p o =II=1 i A.g. , __1..21.••1 L�L . . .. i 'l=ull Q l � g ''11111- x.� t :r .1m .m I i 4 il i :•.:1:. . ...„-_--ri u 13, i. - • .......u::::• ::-*.i:i:::'741C -g alg 01 !, 1 ildr. 11. 1 4 -‘,. .,. :.:.. .:. . .j• 1 b1 a ! 11,1 s 1 s� 1 P m 11 I ill- -1111• • a 1 3 x1 lia RRC %II I 1 huh l li 5z L I W�� ° II iR 1p 'p 111 lb ! Ey ;', i1 y =: labs •� I i %`� id aepR q j;� 1!. u, z 1 $ �1?; g = I N I �� gs,, II a I�! 1 _ a7 4 . ,_ 11 !nil',mill �N 110P... 1 . 1 • iiiII I ,1I(4!11l ""1. P X11 2 8 _ � ;if •* • 1• an 9 3 Iii1iii n � t qr Di i1 •ii 1t• °' ill: k it t .a�1 gi �,t i1�"I ''E ii 1 111 %.t trhi{�1.11ikp 01,uhr, a _ ._• J I � L v It OH r. .r ..,•,- Ml S] . a x�tro,,,r t rpS 6t7!ii 1v�d "ill sz-al 0.0 Agrr.w..•,...,w. 1 ' _� ail ..oil.....1 / 1 set . ill Lu _, ,�, 7 Laws . JJ� Sts . • • ill . li • '••:' ':':::i:•:'''::::f••••i.i ii a� us ,.. ..x.x.A.....g :MW:;:$2.* 1:::* **.gli r.; 1 i— M -7-7,1L-1:4s ••:;r:;: iiC:SSS1 Nr� .aterera-ss w 1i}1] AYLi' ] tilidS ism I 07 b •. N . . . .....,._. _ ____ 4, . I I � .. �.f, 7* -I ■"- ..,.. I7___ k M --- ----•-- 1 , Jam. — I •4// GAN V 0 A 1T.H. .....1] , ....� .7/ • LOST SP .1, I i / • COUN - � � , CLUB WYN' A / , • , 6 G,a h . ".. 57.2/� N COR • 77 p,�••7 « "` / i' CENTE' --.—�'� 8 A. N _Y" COST NO 3 52• �: �' Ra .�TaR. i ' �' 1 �' 52 oh._ o . °IYYE6y�w 1� � A. // e 0 CV � 57.0 1• 524 24 .N 67.0 !r j// / ,uill p5►6.4 1 ii,�.-rzi I ii~ r • / I tit A1(• l C01(�'� "�L.L O _ 0 ..... -•"}r 77.9/ eb so",:or 6: •_ 11 .1 _ 64.0; ,49.1//34.0 -.ytf: •--� 4, crFr: 1 12" l . I6�I4 t '11--1 6"C 23 II f2):7 . PROJECT SITE FIG. NO. 8 . . , WATER DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM CITY OF • EAGA i ,_ _ • i • . 1 • N • _1 ,....4 . , 4: 6 ir • . N\ , ia,' _ 'Hi _ . /A) . ■ Lig t MENDOTA HTS. - i 1 - rth L i I 4 !� ` - tercDtor MM-eQ -Z _ • /l 1.......L. . I r rly. GaN ✓� _mow "I .� '41 +losINsis .N: .ii-1 1 ---�A ;" ' COUNT' • FICE P K ! ��•�� 1 .-- ^�/ x N W Y N D,' A , - �t i• . __ . W 36 CORPORA. 7���� � ,I CENTE • F O RATE CTR.t •, _ "1/_ - 11 - J VNiii ■1AR; A i- / k: i1 __..,`,.. ' 4, ,0-. _'1+1 g fir' 4,-_\, \-. E 1 Ga . F r�c! _ "` ter+ ' ' 8":4 i-- TR FILE I 1 ACR 1 S- — _4116 .6 i idE.. —--- Ti T_.- 9._:—_ � -� c.I.. A. as ii "' Yom/ v'I' :-7�i 1 II.N I I I 1 1 1 1 • % PROJECT SITE • FIG. NO. 7 SANITARY SEWER TRUNK LAYOUT , CITY OF V, i . •[ _. . , r_ EAGA dip • - 'IA.*I A N_____.. N. \ I. ;r .... - ti-,,:;/-7 . , .c7,..,-„,. ..1.„,_.„.„,„J. ) - , P MENDOTA HTS. ' Age' - 4-1V4 . 7-- i MIA• •-• WI'- ..'"",/ H-p •GAN �� . c AND• . - . - t SD. \':t.( I ....� / i I�ST SP i •• s c e i°/� , �COUN . - FIC / ,�,. _ �� 8 O 6::, CORPDBlI� � .,J `' :.� / 4,41 H-d CEMTE .� 2N�B .■ `•/ 7.-1�nST NO 3 ' +�- L Y I I J-�1. c I ,tra ' "" �A. : r ■■ � � � ACES , �` ` PAPVer/in 13. .�. 1/17:711 , I E R i■■r�■.. . _mot i �.� � — �J� ���- �' IND PAR ��, a Q IA - -mot r laETIF � ~ - r1i G�]■A. ! t 7 / 1. , 1 :. ■ , �� 1 ! D- ,� '1"' r) ati ■I _ SCHOO X1 —1 ,i► • I,, 1 3RD �� 9 or. :� �, P �1�' l■ ■� L • �. ALAN ■ • F•-./�/' �■T cis ■ice c�......., 880.0 V - I J C.- r • PROJECT SITE • FIGURE No. 17 . STORM SEWER LAYOUT LEGEND ' MOM OM AREAL CC, • MAP STOISI OEMERS(acl■IYw STORM SEWERS Mossoll 0.m. ' WORM LFT STATION wows) . . STORM UPT STATION OnommO p STORY FORCE MNN •F♦.F••••••10 CITY OF CORD V OM - -- POND NORMAL WATER LEVEL. . . . . . 900.0 EAGAN OVE PQNNN D I MATER LEVEL • 000.0 RLAND ORAMi tE ROYTE a IL=a m sc n J Agenda Information Memo May 15, 1995 Eagan City Council Meeting H. PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION - EAGANDALE CORPORATE CENTER ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: 1. To approve or deny a Preliminary Subdivision (Eagandale Corporate Center Addition) consisting of 20 lots on approximately 198 acres located at the northeast intersection of Lexington Avenue and Yankee Doodle Road in the south one-half of Section 11 subject to the 13 conditions recommended by the Advisory Planning Commission. FACTS: • Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance Company is seeking approval of this Preliminary Plat for the 200 acres in the northeast quadrant of Lexington Avenue and Yankee Doodle guided and zoned Industrial. • The Preliminary Plat generally meets all City Code requirements. The Planning Commission is recommending a variance from the 100' landscaped setback area wherever I-1 districts abut Residential, Agriculture, or Public Facilities districts. They are recommending a 50' minimum depth for the landscaped area because Yankee Doodle Road will separate this industrial area from the residential to the south. BACKGROUND/ATTACHMENTS: Advisory Planning Co ni ion minutes on page through,3Q Staff report on page4 m D through 3 . • Page 19 April 25, 1995 ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION EAGANDALE CORPORATE CENTER- PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION - NORTHWESTERN MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE CO. Chairperson Miller opened the next public hearing of the evening regarding a Preliminary Subdivision (Eagandale Corporate Center) consisting of 20 lots on approximately 198 acres located at the northeast intersection of Lexington Avenue and Yankee Doodle Road in the south V2 of Section 11. Project Planner Ridley introduced this item. Mr. Ridley highlighted the information presented in the City staffs planning report dated April 17, 1995, as amended on April 25, 1995. Mr. Ridley noted the background and history, the existing conditions and the surrounded uses of the subject property. Mr. Ridley noted that the City Code requires a landscaped area with a minimum depth of 100 feet whenever an "I-1" district is across the street from.an residential, agricultural, or public facility district. He stated that staff believes this setback is excessive in this case because the street separating the two zoning districts is an improved County road. Therefore, staff is recommending a variance to allow a 50-foot minimum depth for a landscaped area located across the street from a residential agricultural public facility district. Dale Huber, a representative of Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance Co., complimented staff with their work on the proposal. He stated that all outstanding issues will be worked out before final plat. A member of the Board of Directors of the Carriage Hills Condominiums which is located across the street from the proposed development, stated that they were never able to review the proposal and inquired as to the reasons for the 50-foot setback variance. Community Development Director Reichert explained that the variance is recommended by the staff because the proposed office park use on the corner of Lexington and Yankee Doodle is a light industrial use which does not require 100 feet. The resident further expressed concern regarding the noise level from proposed industrial uses, in addition to concern of the widening of Yankee Doodle Road. Mr. Huber responded that the widening or traffic control on Yankee Doodle Road is at the County's demand. He further stated that Dakota County demanded that the proposed Neal Armstrong Boulevard be aligned with Golf Drive across Yankee Doodle Road. Another resident of Carriage Hills Condominiums inquired as to the proposed truck uses to which Reichert advised that a conditional use permit must be obtained prior to any truck uses. Ridley further noted that the plan presented to the Commission is merely a conceptional site plan and there is no assurance or guarantee that the shown building footprints will be the actual configuration in the future. A third resident of the 3 co Page 20 April 25, 1995 ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION Carriage Hills Condominiums expressed concern regarding the increase of traffic due to the development. Chairperson Miller inquired with the applicant as to the time frame for the completion of the entire development to which Mr. Huber responded that they hope to complete the entire site between two and five years but that road and utility improvements will start this summer. Member Wallace moved, Hey! seconded, a motion to recommend approval of a Preliminary Subdivision (Eagandale Corporate Center) consisting of 20 lots on approximately 198 acres located at the northeast intersection of Lexington Avenue and Yankee Doodle Road in the south V2 of Section 11, subject to the following conditions: Standard Conditions 1. These standard conditions of plat approval as adopted by Council action on February 2, 1993 shall be complied with: Al, B1, B2, B3, B4, Cl, C2, C3, C4, D1, El, Fl, Gl, and H1. Site Plan 2. An ISP shall be obtained by the applicant, with review and input by the City, prior to City Council action on the Final Subdivision. 3. A variance to allow a 50'minimum depth for landscaped yards located across the street from an "R", "A", or"P" District shall be approved by City Council. 4. Individual lot development plans shall be subject to an administrative site plan review and approval. Grading Plan 5. Detailed plans and specifications of the proposed retaining wall construction shall be submitted prior to City Council action on the Final Subdivision. Access/Street Design 6. The proposed vacation/extension of Aldrin Drive issue shall be resolved prior to City Council action on the Final Subdivision. Page 21 April 25, 1995 ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION 7. The signalization of the Neil Armstrong/Golf View- Yankee Doodle Road intersection shall be resolved prior to City Council action on the Final Subdivision. Wetlands 8. The wetland replacement plan for the development shall be approved, subject to the following conditions: a. Trees #756, 758, 761, and 770 in the tree inventory for the site shall be preserved by re-orienting Ponds C2A and C2B to the north and east. b. The proposed .8 acre wetland mitigation area due east of MnDNR protected water#135 shall be re-located to avoid impacts to oak trees. c. The City will reserve the right to modify the wetland replacement plan based on changes in the Wetland Conservation Act made by the 1995 legislature (which will be known in May 1995). Modification can be made only to the extent necessary to accommodate elimination of tree- related impacts associated with up to .8 acres of replacement wetland. d. No grading shall be allowed within 30 feet of the delineated wetland edge of Wetland Basins A and E, except for up to a total of 450 lineal feet along the south end of Wetland Basin A (for road construction) and north end of Wetland Basin E (for detention basin construction). The 30 foot wide area will be managed to support natural vegetation and shall be left unmowed. This area shall be clearly marked on both the grading plan and in the field prior to any grading activity. e. At least .5 acres of replacement wetland shall be established as forested wetland through the planting of tree and shrub species compatible with seasonally saturated soils. The number and types of trees planted shall be based on those shown on the tree inventory which will be removed by filling of Wetland Basin G. f. The pond level bounce for Pond DP-11 (Wetland Basin A) should be 3 feet or less for a 10-year storm event and 2 feet or less for a 2-year storm event. g. The developer shall submit for review by the water resources coordinator detailed plans regarding the grading for wetland replacement and ponding areas, including areas of hydric soil placement and a Page 22 April 25, 1995 ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION vegetation planting plan. The plan must be approved by staff before any grading plan application for the site is submitted to the City. Tree Preservation 9. The developer shall provide tree protection measures(i.e. 4 foot polyethylene laminate safety netting)to be installed at the Drip Line or at the perimeter of the Critical Root Zone, whichever is greater, of the significant trees/woodlands to be preserved. 10. The developer shall contact the City Forestry Division at least five days prior to any site grading to ensure compliance with the approved Tree Preservation Plan. Dedications 11. This subdivision is subject to a cash park and trail dedication. 12. Issues regarding additional "specimen" tree preservation and possible cash parkland dedication credit for a public connection between the two DNR waterbodies and other potential public "save" areas shall be resolved prior to City Council action on the Final Subdivision. 13. The developer shall plat the property. All approved in favor. • ``S3 PLANNING REPORT CITY OF EAGAN REPORT DATE: April 17, 1995 CASE #: 11-PP-10-3-95 APPLICANT: Northwestern Mutual Life HEARING DATE: April 25, 1995 PROPERTY OWNER: Same PREPARED BY: Mike Ridley REQUEST: Preliminary Subdivision (Eagandale Corporate Center) LOCATION: Northeast intersection of Lexington Avenue & Yankee Doodle Road COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: Industrial ZONING: Industrial SUMMARY OF REQUEST Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance Company is requesting approval of a Preliminary Subdivision consisting of 20 lots on approximately 200 acres located east of Lexington Avenue and north of Yankee Doodle Road in the SW 1/4 of Section 11. AUTHORITY FOR REVIEW City Code Chapter 13, Section 13.20, Subd. 6. states: In the case of subdivision,the Planning 'Commission and the Council shall be guided by criteria, including the following, in approving, denying or establishing conditions related thereto: A. That the proposed subdivision does comply with applicable City Code provisions and the Comprehensive Guide Plan. B. That the design or improvement of the proposed subdivision complies with applicable plans of Dakota County, State of Minnesota, or the Metropolitan Council. C. That the physical characteristics of the site including,but not limited to,topography, vegetation, susceptibility to erosion and siltation, susceptibility to flooding, water storage, and retention are such that the site is suitable for the type of development or use contemplated. D. That the site physically is suitable for the proposed density of development. E. That the design of the subdivision or the proposed improvements is not likely to cause environmental damage. 3o Planning Report - Eagandale Corporate Center April 25, 1995 Page 2 F. That the design of the subdivision or the type of improvements is not likely to cause health problems. G. That the design of the subdivision or the improvements will not conflict with easements of record or with easements established by judgement of court. H. That completion of the proposed development of the subdivision can be completed in a timely manner so as not to cause an economic burden upon the City for maintenance, repayment of bonds or similar burden. L That the subdivision has been properly planned for possible solar energy system use within the subdivision or as it relates to adjacent property. (Refer to City Handbook on Solar Access). J. That the design of public improvements for the subdivision is compatible. and consistent with the platting or approved preliminary plat on adjacent lands. K. , That the subdivision is in compliance with those standards set forth in that certain document entitled"City of Eagan Water Quality Management Plan for the Gun Club Lake Watershed Management Organization" which document is properly approved and filed with the office of the City Clerk hereinafter referred to as the "Water Quality Management Plan". Said document and all of the notations, references and other information contained therein shall have the same force and effect as if fully set down herein and is hereby made a part of this Chapter by reference and incorporated herein as fully as if set forth herein at length. It shall be the responsibility of the City Clerk to maintain the Water Quality Management Plan and make the same available to the public. BACKGROUND/HISTORY The proposed subdivision consists of approximately 160 acres of unplatted property (3 parcels) and approximately 40 acres of Eagandale Center Industrial Park No. 4 (originally subdivided in 1970). • An Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW)was prepared for this property in 1982. In correspondence with the City in late 1992 and early 1993, the developer's consultants indicated that 2.62 million SF of ultimate development was proposed for the subject property. Because the amount of development analyzed in the 1982 EAW was greater than that now proposed and because the environmental review was initiated and completed under the rules in effect from 1977-1982,no further review would be required under the Minnesota Environmental Review Program. 3 DE Planning Report - Eagandale Corporate Center April 250 1995 - Page 3 The 1982 EAW stated that an Indirect Source Permit (ISP) would be required for the project because parking needs would exceed the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) threshold. Although no specific development proposal has been submitted with this subdivision request, given the size of the area and level of development that could occur,the parking needs to serve development within the proposed subdivision will certainly exceed the MPCA ISP threshold of 2000 spaces for a new parking facility. The.MPCA rules also require that if an indirect source(eg.,parking facility) is constructed in increments that individually do not require a permit, they must be added together to determine the requirement for an ISP. EXISTING CONDITIONS There are three homes located on the unplatted portion of the subject 'site. That portion of the site platted as Eagandale Center Industrial Park No. 4 is undeveloped. The site is characterized by largely open grassland/agricultural fields with a number of wetlands scattered throughout. Significant trees and woodland massings are generally concentrated around the two largest ponds which are DNR protected waters and the south and west perimeter of the property. Wetlands,wetland mitigation areas and associated ponding easements remove approximately 18 acres from the total developable site area. SURROUNDING USES The following uses, zoning and comprehensive plan designations surround the subject property: North - Eagandale Center Industrial Park No. 3 & 4; zoned and guided Industrial. South - Carriage Hill apartments/golf course; zoned R-4/PF; designated D-IV/PF. East - Eagandale Center Industrial Park No. 4 & 5; zoned and guided Industrial. West - Undeveloped; zoned Light Industrial; zoned PD/IND; designated CPD/IND. EVALUATION OF REOUEST A. Preliminary Subdivision Compatibility with Surrounding Area-There is no specific development proposal associated with this subdivision request;however,future development within this subdivision will clearly be compatible with existing and future industrial development to the north and east of the subject site. 3D 6 Planning Report - Eagandale Corporate Center April 25, 1995 Page 4 The compatibility of permitted development along the south (Yankee Doodle Road) and west boundary (Lexington Avenue) of the subdivision in relation to the Carriage Hill apartments and the pending Central Area development may be less certain. Permitted uses in the Industrial Zoning District range from office to welding shops; however, outdoor storage of any kind requires a conditional use permit (CUP). The recent ordinance amendment regulating exterior building materials for industrial buildings combined with the City's authority to scrutinize and evaluate potential affects of proposed conditional uses as they relate to the surrounding area affords the City a level of control to determine appropriate future development within the entire subdivision. Under the CUP process, the APC and City Council have the authority to determine the suitability of a proposed location for development of a.heavy use that requires outdoor equipment/material storage or a truck and freight terminal, for example. Phasing - The developer is proposing a two phase development as follows: Phase 1: Streets, utilities, and wetland mitigation. Phase 2: Individual lot development. Parking-An ISP should be obtained prior to City Council action on the Final Subdivision. Lots - All proposed lots meet or exceed industrial zone area and width requirements. Setbacks - The City Code prohibits requires a landscaped yard with a minimum depth of 100' whenever an "I-1" District is across the street from an "R", "A", or "P" District. Staff believes this setback is excessive in this case because the street separating the two zoning districts is an improved county road. Therefore,staff is recommending a 50'minimum depth for landscaped yards located across the street from an "R", "A", or "F District. Site Plan Review - Individual lot development should be subject to an administrative site plan review and approval. Grading/Wetlands - The Preliminary Grading Plan is acceptable. If retaining walls are necessary,the developer shall provide detailed plans and specifications of the proposed wall construction. Also, the developer should be responsible for abandoning all well and septic systems in accordance with Dakota County and City requirements. The site contains approximately 17 acres of wetland in nine wetland basins. The developer is proposing to fill a total of 1.65 acres of this wetland; and provide wetland replacement at a rate of at least 2 acres of created wetland area for every acre filled, as per Wetland Conservation Act requirements. The Advisory Parks, Recreation, and Natural Resource 307 Planning Report - Eagandale Corporate Center April 25, 1995 Page 5 Commission(APRNRC)has recommended approval of this plan subject to conditions listed at the end of this report. Storm Drainage/Water Ouality - The Storm Drainage/Water Quality Plan is acceptable. Much of the run off generated from this site ultimately enters LeMay Lake, which is classified as a Class A waterbody. The developer has created an on-site water quality system that will treat storm water from this site, at full development, so effectively, that it will contain no more nutrient loading than what is generated today (pre-development). The APRNRC recommended approval of the Water Quality Plan at their April 17, 1995 meeting. Utilities - The Utility Plan is acceptable. Sanitary sewer and watermain will be extended throughout the site to serve each lot. Access/Street Design - The preliminary street design and driveway layout require minor revisions. The proposed vacation of a portion of Aldrin Drive requires further staff review to determine if this street should be extended through this site to Mike Collins Drive and further review and discussion with Dakota County is necessary to determine if the Neil Armstrong/Golf View - Yankee Doodle Road intersection should be signalized. Easements/Right-Of-Way/Permits-The preliminary street design provides adequate right- of-way widths for the internal streets throughout the subdivision and also provides right-of- way as requested by Dakota County. Any work within Dakota County right-of-way will require a permit from the County. Also, permits will be required from MPCA,MCWS,and Minnesota Department of Health for the proposed utility construction. Tree Preservation Policy/Park Dedication-The APRNRC has recommend approval of the Tree Preservation Plan associated with Phase 1; however, the commission directed the developer to work jointly with the Natural Resources Sub-Committee & Parkland Acquisition Sub-Committee to explore additional"specimen"tree preservation and possible cash parkland dedication credit for a public connection between the two DNR waterbodies and other potential public "save" areas. ,SUMMARY/CONCLUSION There is no specific development proposal associated with this subdivision request;however, future development within this subdivision will be compatible with the surrounding area. The proposed grading, storm drainage,utility, and street design are acceptable as proposed. There are a number of issues pending further review; however, the ultimate conclusion of L.31j)g Planning Report - Eagandale Corporate Center April 25, 1995 Page 6 these issues most likely will not have a considerable impact on the general subdivision design. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED To approve/deny the Eagandale Corporate Center Preliminary Subdivision consisting of 20 lots on approximately 200 acres located at the northeast intersection of Lexington Avenue and Yankee Doodle Road. Approval subject to the conditions listed below. Standard Conditions 1. These standard conditions of plat approval as adopted by Council action on February 2, 1993 shall be complied with: Al, Bi, B2, B3, B4, Cl, C2, C3, C4, D1, El, Fl, GI, and Hi. Site Plan 2. An ISP shall be obtained by the applicant, with review and input by the City, prior to City Council action on the Final Subdivision. 3. A 50'minimum depth for landscaped yards located across the street from an"R","A", or "P" District shall be allowed. 4. Individual lot development plans shall be subject to an administrative site plan review and approval. Grading Plan 5. Detailed plans and specifications of the proposed retaining wall construction shall be submitted prior to City Council action on the Final Subdivision. Access/Street Design 6. The proposed vacation/extension of Aldrin Drive issue shall be resolved prior to City Council action on the Final Subdivision. 7. The signalization of the Neil Armstrong/Golf View - Yankee Doodle Road intersection shall be resolved prior to City Council action on the Final Subdivision. Wetlands • 8. The wetland replacement plan for the development shall be approved, subject to the following conditions: Planning Report - Eagandale Corporate Center April 25, 1995 Page 7 a. Trees #756, 758, 761, and 770 in the tree inventory for the site shall be preserved by re-orienting Ponds C2A and C2B to the north and.east. b. The proposed .8 acre wetland mitigation area due east of MnDNR protected water #135 shall be re-located to avoid impacts to oak trees. c. The City will reserve the right to modify the wetland replacement plan based on changes in the Wetland Conservation Act made by the 1995 legislature (which will be known in May 1995). Modification can be made only to the extent necessary to accommodate elimination of tree-related impacts associated with up to .8 acres of replacement wetland. d. No grading shall be allowed within 30 feet of the delineated wetland edge of Wetland Basins A and E, except for up to a total of 450 lineal feet along the south end of Wetland Basin A (for road construction) and north end of Wetland Basin E(for detention basin construction).The 30 foot wide area will be managed to support natural vegetation and shall be left unmowed. This area shall be clearly marked on both the grading plan and in the field prior to any grading activity. e. At least .5 acres of replacement wetland shall be established as forested wetland through the planting of tree and shrub species compatible with seasonally saturated soils. The number and types of trees planted shall be based on those shown on the tree inventory which will be removed by filling of Wetland Basin G. £ The pond level bounce for Pond DP-11 (Wetland Basin A) should be 3 feet or less for a 10-year storm event and 2 feet or less for a 2-year storm event. g. The developer shall submit for review by the water resources coordinator detailed plans regarding the grading for wetland replacement and ponding areas,including areas of hydric soil placement and a vegetation planting plan. The plan must be approved by staff before any grading plan application for the site is submitted to the City. Tree Preservation 9. The developer shall provide tree protection measures (i.e. 4 foot polyethylene laminate safety netting) to be installed at the Drip Line or at the perimeter of the Critical Root Zone, whichever is greater, of the significant trees/woodlands to be preserved. 3 / D . Planning Report - Eagandale Corporate Center April 25, 1995 Page 8 10. The developer shall contact the City Forestry Division at least five days prior to any site grading to ensure compliance with the approved Tree Preservation Plan. Dedications 11. This subdivision is subject to a cash park and trail dedication. 12. Issues regarding additional "specimen" tree preservation and possible cash parkland dedication credit for a public connection between the two DNR waterbodies and other potential public "save" areas shall be resolved prior to City Council action on the Final Subdivision. • STANDARD CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL A. financial Obligations 1. This development shall accept its additional financial obligations as defined in the staff's report in accordance with the final plat dimensions and the rates in effect at the time of final plat approval. • B. Easementsand Rights-of-Way • 1. This development shall dedicate 10-foot drainage and utility easements centered over all lot lines and, in addition, where necessary to accommodate existing or proposed utilities for drainage ways within the plat. The development shall dedicate easements of sufficient width and location as determined necessary by engineering standards. 2. This development shall dedicate, provide, or financially guarantee the acquisition costs of drainage; ponding, and utility easements in addition to public street rights-of-way as required by the alignment, depth, and storage capacity of all required public utilities and streets located beyond the boundaries of this plat as necessary to service or accommodate this • development. 3. • This development shall dedicate all public right-of-way and temporary slope easements for ultimate development of adjacent roadways as required by the appropriate jurisdictional agency. 4. This development shall dedicate adequate drainage and ponding easements • to incorporate the required high water elevation plus three (3) feet as • necessitated by storm water storage volume requirements. C. Plans and Specifications 1. All public and private streets, drainage systems and utilities necessary to • provide service to this development shall be designed and certified by a registered professional engineer in accordance with City adopted codes, engineering standards, guidelines and policies prior to application for final plat approval. 2. A detailed grading, drainage, erosion, and sediment control plan must be prepared In accordance with current City standards prior to final plat approval. 3. This development shall ensure that all dead-end public streets shall have a cul-de-sac constructed in accordance with City engineering standards. 4. A separate detailed landscape plan shall be submitted overlaid on the proposed grading and utility plan. The financial guarantee for such plan shall be included in the Development Contract and shall not be released until one year after the date of City certified compliance. D. public Improvements .1. If any improvements are to be installed under a City contract, the appropriate project must be approved by Council action prior to final plat approval. E. Permits 1. This development shall be responsible for the acquisition of all regulatory agency permits required by the affected agency prior to final plat approval. F. "arks and Tamils Dedication • 1. This development shall fulfill its park and trail dedication requirements as recommended by the Advisory Parks, Recreation and Natural Resource Commission and approved by Council action. G. Water Quality Dedication • 1. This development shall be responsible for providing a cash dedication, ponding, or a combination thereof in accordance with the criteria identified in the City's Water Quality Management Plan, as recommended by the Advisory Parks, Recreation and Natural Resource Commission and approved by Council action. H. Other 1. All subdivision,zoning and other ordinances affecting this development shall - be adhered to, unless specifically granted a variance by,Council action. Advisory Planning Commission City Councll Approved: august 25, 1987 September 15. 1987 Revised: _July 10, 1990 Revised: February 2. 1993 TSNS STANDARD.CON TANDARD.CON FINANCIAL OBLIGATION - Eagandale Corporate Center There are pay-off balances of special assessments totaling$24,385 on the parcels proposed for platting. The pay-off balance will be allocated to the lots created by the plat. At this time, there are no pending assessments on the parcel proposed for platting. The estimated financial obligation presented is subject to change based upon areas,dimensions and land uses contained in the final plat. Based upon the study of the financial obligations collected in the past and the uses proposed for the property, the following charges are proposed. The charges are computed using the City's existing fee schedule and connections proposed to be made to the City's utility system based on the submitted plans. Improvement Use Rate Quantity Amount Lateral Benefit Sanitary Sewer C/I $19.20/ff 2,640 ff$ 50,688 • Lateral Benefit Water C/I $25.50/ff 2,490 ff 63,495 Water Trunk C/I $1,740/Ac 32 Ac 55,680 Water Availability Charge C/I $2,745/Ac 32 Ac 87,840 Storm Sewer Trunk C/I $.116/sq ft 3,136,320 sq ft 363.813 Total ;621,516 Areas are 80% of the area not previously charged for listed utilities. n u sI' S. east i \� 1 y TM! `� �,� 94 = \\0L X r� ; =i, CO.LD. 26 -, LONE OAK ROAD \ LONE OAK ROAD 15-' /// i' 0 � •111 all iI 4 ■ 3 CLLrtiwEw al APOLLO_' ROAD I �_ I TRUN,c N . w A IIII I W_. V I `� y� u . 1; 'A I ( ' q' u RITA I 2 A 8I I v l 1 P'pp r r.,,l RD. TL r r—wri /. j dip CH .951 1 R WV -1 — - - - ,- 14.1•.;;t;;;...; •t.�.ti:,:tier;7*.•:ri-- - - T` -...4',. r :gi ::: i i� ..•: # \c.!. il...- TAldARAC PT. g � I NORWAY PT. xa,- FOREST RDCE TR. I ::: '�- IRONWOOD LA.iG- REDWOOD PT. •I ,!7- SPRUCE PT. (� ' ;:4 I I Y ANKEE DOODLE ROAD :ti?:;'r:•,%�'�'�'�'����:�•�'�'�����'��'�:�:� I NCO'I , I O •'��: .:•�' r I-rANKEEPL. Ia - - --- �--.- --- - - - - --- 1 WN' °C� OTt 50 ,I• i � 7k ' '�. CARRIAGE HILLS g' Wgkorl. 7�- Rail I \ti • GOLF COURSE w_ii ' i I, 24__,'LEARY PARK IcaFVEw • ti t 1 ,yJ• %7 x' •`-„p ,. 0'LEA- ' I. .DA 0J "1, \LAKJ I BLUE sI' g o I 2 a�� s WOOp TR. 4� vt I r . • '' -c VI: Cwt..•_•' ND e{r�T aO' eczLCRJ W000 W.., �� BET 1W }AnA Eli r IRD LN. LN. CRTf OAK = WESCOTT •f&t.-K'�, Ina,ci—■\ �I I y, `-ST ,,,ICYt STATION item 3 JAY WA qp PARK i 6 JR th,,....,a,f,„' u �ci 3 MUELLER/' 4-ELBE tL9I 0 DOVE Ci. FAL w11 AL '` �5 CT. % • \ - •VERLOOK PL. � 7.6.r.14 .; DEIMARK ,""""•• I py�. •r. ( 4 yr ski. WA L C T DE i HURLEY 4 ° LC. , 0 x ..-'• T NMARK '`LAKE R. AL I I 1 I ~ MCA �, S R. E. \ 33 .}� wESCOty R - ' : ' 72 f( `+r NTW.. ir�'� _ - - ° 0 WESCOTT ROAD a 1 —A'„, . ,..,.6,...., g , ,,., tt :.-.1 ES T vEw .1''y,n,S Fil :I �.,,,. `*ti y, m _ _ .A .LA. -LI .� , ' •,�, �,+� O '.1• �.�..� '`•LI'I ��" \�� :ROLE RIDGE 2 i k� ,..2 WC�TFI, ' 'x�IZROCE tl�•• NORTNV,Ew PA �' 'yt �(i f C • •' - 2— CAR ___ _ l �rAYC£ P - t` cNOSHURD lyL rr` 60--�' MOS NORTHVEw : '.. " a c1,-1 � 1 r l'9,‘--\ "1. PARK ��� '1c w ��� u I EAGANDALE CORPORATE CENTER 3/6 VW • s a 1 4 Oe~ ;...... •. ........„•:....,. _..... tf,...,,1 • • COMPREHENSIVE GUIDE PLAN . • ' ,� �� V IND (Industrial) °�" ; yi: 1 . .. :: CP0 ... -.kplip - % , . .,.•., 1 - / - • ": .i,...p., ip v = - t 1T suca •. urti . .•-1 . a • • A �r 1:41T;Xl*:%:71 :11\ 11.. 'r; ,L /U S. POSTAL 11111111111 ,�ti \GI j SERVICE II! ". ' �'. ZONING ,,, ��� .1 �;:�, — .11 111.-7 '�.� 1-1 (Limited Industrial) I Le?' /wa1 rr . ' III L, •( tom'.: :.. F..: , . .e . ..... 1 r: 1(711 •I -1 I ft,.. • I '' 7fti,-' •, S' ' ••..• NOS I , M- , !-• , •CG P.O. •71 II ••—.ti ft; . . ' ` 1 TO MH . LB role■ I PD i.'�� _ ' ~app,' CP I .►ticuTT r I- '' � // l T CARRIAGE `'mdWb . 1."./lh Illk:SWIL :4,1 COPP EAGANDALF, CORPORATE CENTER 3J7 , ` .` \-- - n I .-1- 1.-1.-1 - r 7 7 1 7 7 7 r I I w L. Z a tt 1 I I I•:',. I I I I I I I t I I I I I 1 Z J ,° W 1 I I t l '''' I I I I I 1 1 1 1 I I I 1 W J Z N =•I - 1 I R I ° I - 11 = l '41 ' I t1 ° I - 1 1 I II V < < Z VI I%o) V kI , C`i 1: - ,11,,• . - 1 ) _ 3'.+l . _I : 11 : w Q O E. 00 tea.== - : .of h . r� - .. .. ...e' _ Q 4 - QomIJ : x - 's _ ^o_ oo- �- - - U N 0 b W ;:c ?l. ° W Z IA o �. =0 .4. ..k........ I Q tz in sic r < , z 1 ,,, r iiiii, ,,,,,‘,- ..„....1 J , lioz, ,,,, 1 1 ... ,. ... iiii LLI i+�:'%�1;A-L Agr r^ M G .1 �- " ••:` -- d�_ t 1 'i 3 iLk!t•:;:.:',. 3-Elii---- �I'r'i •/`,. g ',•,1 f,1\1 I ,t 11(x1~ 1 '��'�i °p 1711 �' � 'I: i1.: i) ,\:\. fi \'`\' -- - I-- - '•'• 1 c 41 '' 4!1 })}`� , - \\ !i,1 I I { ^ \•:::P �— ---- �'--- - - -- ° -'fib.I - - °I .&‘..„2:.--. i\,pli I•- 1,,/�'1..: if. I Ii - ,/+ �._• `C ° - -_ an.o _ _- 1 -Mil ..Ilse FX, r .i: �;.;., 'f .,( 1 Il �(��(}!+/��'I 1 4. Y�` '�� �\,p=�_ 1, 1� f ° r // 11 t • r r ' I 1 ,•, i .=, _, .r -...p i : i �i t 0 1 �l , - �• - �t j -Gig ),1•1 'T-,--'"7-- 1, Ii -, ,i; 1 %....., )..;//' .-7t,i(c ) • ...:,'/,',-,- - v- , ,,‘ -- ,• , (ii!,',\, i 1 \i "''''.-.1)'4 I ----7`\ 'a1 I '!/;// ` '�\1111 ) ( ! _ yq o 1, ,r •`` ` �. ^ /: I ,vim`. \� 1 : - J- _ i ! - '/ -- ` '• '��\ '$% .it l '`�k iI! <..,..\. G'°�TO`,.e_:: •`•, 1 i i,$�f_�il I 'OAS ONOYISnri VIOLA+ _•'..,.. . �_•_,^1• �' �` --•----4 I 1 (/-1 Oa' O \4 i• !:1i,-..,,\', �. •-.1.-_— --� ", / /• � � 1, !O ---:';.----- ■ '/ • . , s,CF-..0 ‘ \ • ' , 1 a te ' . •, � '11�i O O p o0 O 1 II I. ~ i -- ° iii.4 \ i ' .ice I o L- - v N. \ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ —i — W Z I— w N I I I":•"I I I¢I I I I I I I I I I w Z °' ,- x 1 I ' 151DIRI £. 1 = I;I = 1 = 1 # 1 ° I = 1 = 1 ' 1 = I ' 1 ' ai1 = z 0 ce I I I I I `=1 . I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 l l l'-! aW— �-� w z ' CO - -- -- 1 1 i '-• I ► a"" I 1 11 — . —L r11 ;1 `` 1.i; o I - %i g° J 1iii j1 a Z W = csi c. — ,r �lR'E ii'Mitt!€ W CC 1 1,• a '. .• W i W _ i c I► ,mot'., a 1.:•• j'" M Lrl — it- - - — I ' < Z- it 1. j�1 ,„ ,, III +--- -,— ' -1 — M .�,yo'�: W, i,j;j] 1 di p W 1 [=�1 - - - -e• - - - -^ - - � - - �� 7 11J i 1 .. I 7:- I f - I EJ t;! a i ' r 1� r- I— - '`- - n — ii b11 f . i ! li I-- --I I Y POhI;, ,il I 1 jilt li II 1 _ of itI UJI Ull!1..::, I I :i I _ 11; I — ] —,; „— r' '. I re +r . —1,. I 1I, I _� ` r I -1 1 ; ;%I I ` � lfii11aa11■ S ..a:c■11 s , // h 1 1 333!3!!333!!!! c.. 1 !, 6 T 1 �t // i ' 1,l, i 1 pi, I 1 ;i Lt..) __A .. / :. --NITA-1 I 1.11,;„.....1„, .7.„. _ , "/ Law..... . r VI/ Iia l Ull 111 I I � ._ IZ :N::::: 1 g I i'k n 1 lir rr1.! r:. ` I I P II I it '1 Mei$15 I. i� - w I.... L Ii Ii' .,, I -�� • -r. —`\ I w i fil 113l1S33 I 4 I ,—'—"�,, . I 7i.' I I—I .� V. y 2 J 1 . `i---aa+r---� W,Imo I r1 I .n., -E 1 o I II / / .. ra\+ i 1 I j // /� g g 81 — —=-— rr�,�r N:� ,- a ....r__L.. "� . jig .• I 1 _ .._.. woe R ONDrl5Y11, ma'�.— `Sf'i I - - —"`r — ' 111p i 1 11 11 a5 I 11 r - -- --! a ' II i3 ° 1 — k - i 1 n + i j3 f N 10 li 0 II I iL - I� i ———— —s ain`:. a....c / nti3A 4101.414031 !i — R 7 1 I! \ a;.9 2 I Z ; : 1 • 1 1 7 I 5 2 1 I I I I 1 I , I , , 4. a : I I I I I I i I I, - I I I I Q= 1 I ,1 I , I I I V•J I I I Q=� I I,£ I I 1 : I ; 1 I -tea' c=! . W Q 2 I I I I § I I I I I I I I I •I a qq 5 a -----'------"-...... .\■_.......L...:_ � I I I I 7 I 1 , 1 I _ _j _ . Y 0= O J FE �Y U W is,. Hi J (.0 IX G9 w (II . / K-11.11 '...) C, '') 9 0 Vz6 a _ s I J, 1:1 s = a - • 0 I • 1 T c. ,7--\II,ii .r ill , If i• cd till/U \ _ __P 1 i .\ `� i _ �\`�' a iii \ \ $j 1 iii S ; . • Q i:f" _ of 2 1 � I al E,@ • iri w ,,...„-,,, J� u 1.— aYt5 .. ,-- 0 0 4' 31 I ' h�` ' a - _, i------- ...4/,,,,,,A,. .rte _ i ` _,' ', ...4 , gra 1 A \ .. ,.......< .: i;•1._. ,...fi— .1 \ s ' I 4-P d.• L 9 i , \41., ., (.6:. ,....!iie w\ I 1.41 I I:::1 I I V i I o I l o l I , . LP° I„___,,,.... . 3,_ Li,” , , 0 LJ_ LC p . e - , _ n BR:pa. .a e. ,ins ■ 'l �...:.....0 - _ —"`v war r`yr '$ 1 +111 I 3flN3AYNOLONIX31 a 1 11 I I `may . r- t )1 W al 2 W.12 CO i 6� N 11 Z = 2. yid O 6 11 i s I Q � 1 1 k < < rig v r 6'' W i 6, I ,'1{ �— M a V H if °iii I I�,J 1I:1 A 3 . • 1Y r i, ° f h pp8 0 t! bib z 0 11 1 Y o.,--40 in, ----1=- 1 1 I p .1, I i' I I; Ii]Iit - D - rr 1 1 I a k. C:\M.r / } \� a a 111 i■ I ti b r I \—. \\ /g,,• 1f-, .7.— .}1 1 1 i of I ' r 131 ' ! }}rr/ ��■(1 1 j . , I11 ' i 14 11 iii iii { i --1;_�/ll_ •; 10 • al.! ii iii 1 1 1 big 1 l'PliP1- . 1 b ill •�..1"� ! '{1 ti L iii> 1.r $ i ! I I. ■ 4k_____________IY■r_-_ 1 .: 11 {L- ,®®1 _. ; I yl a I r 1 1� li . s ! `r 11 11 1l G -" r— 1 II Lg f t! fYrr r i II -iir____.__M-� J' 41 •1 .7‘47.-f. itrr 1��� O I i fi b i / �. 1 iY :b `� IE /r; 4 4 i i irrr 4 - i 1 III' tl 1 1 .... l� �___ �� hi t ' s I� '1 4. it ":; O 1 1I 1 i al 1,!.. \ �� �� 1 iiiiii/ . ii t °aa IYr■ i el \\;. MI • R 1'S i , - •- - 'J'i " IC Tt, I! r 1� \ i li 'iii t 1l 1 Illy. : II g 1 I Nit ir w t h. p ` Si ';i "IYrr tii It4>°-' �." !i 11 11 �� Y el hi 111 fir �\ `�_ � __ --- -.Abr.._ ,, !`' g i rill 1 11' ' 11-__ '1' !111! I11 f bE 1 t� �R 1 I. �i r i�1'i° lj1 bi '� '-� X11 11 ..�. f p '1' I': 1qq 1' 1 I II ��i�P �E ;! i81 i? y1 e ` a p I b a {I S 6! 41.11 r : S 1 1 1i' i f : ::_ rYr r r t: 1 ,;�� ,_ _, ___ _%_ ____��, ALMS■ v ' • { it! ; +-- 2 La h • a z ao t � W I. 11$ ' 1 R o a o i � ^ Z n51 lull hi 0 < < 0 W in 1100 ,,u hi F-- < a< I--,�� < 0 W Z W ce Ba t•,r CS { 2 $ 1l' ., W rn $! k. 1. W • �� {i i g < x i ! .ii j1 - c f-- �ii5p 5 ;;; l ■ ! , Z a 1 ■ < 1! 1 w ■i W !I W ii I' ! 1 a 3 1 1 '� 1• i o ;�;' 1C1 1,1f.! r � c.. I riil ! i 1 1:11'; r'r I iii ! ;1;i 1i41, �!� ,,,,.....i1 005 , _���;! — I ! 1M ! R{Y y • _•_ _•1• Jam., -r, ---+ -- r _. i -r -�--� ,['q tr— �\'� $�j y 4 i , W< t �/ it • y1 lY.r re" 0< 7 it Q kl v.• �rna•:.r..�arn� ` i.. _ . ,,`_•_-F� ..Z • , lid 11 . • f' W 1• !' I �t d� ! p Iv 11•II6 --O�W'_fay--71'-i b ' < •{ { 'ill '1R.,/Ir g� Wr 12 i : rt I < Yr I IYr i R < ! I�;; i Ir:°CO ii i CNI 1 b- o - ':-"II I k 4 i t �pr■*9 I !17„,"'"'•,% 1 ij 1 {iii:ti. ° .n[i{iil II { 2 Yr X:I 1 1 . _'I 1 UM fa—'''''',...k1.114 '•I`11_ 1A. lI■r w �r y r-r--r_:r_�r� 1 III tr!!41 1 Ilk 1! O. I. I I V j' use '`• �\ A. Yrrrr d r $ f [ 5 1 {lti B[5 I ,/ I { l... ,r► , 1 .. .... \Z., 0 ... 1 I�i \` , I e i r,S{ 1.13"a 0' 1� �; 1 ��' Yr.`i.r. t• 1 r �r�, T. { i■•$'1 ,it 11. t! -•"'a . i 51^15,1515 01 i�� R"�°1lt= }■5 �f •R 1�1p- .1''=1''-' .,_11:Q,..- - i+ ��,11• rR IYr C 1� � ���1R�11[ '��•Ir�',����t■ �00 ,• •• Y_* ♦ J �. -- I --.,..- 400`'"' \ 'r vt +) fait it �s !" 1 ,/• Ir ,I - -.—��� , `� '� Iv! ' Y{�1� IA k= • }� k:xi: 11 ! ! r I l �• ---_ .r ! R : 12 t■r • M '' a ill 1 I�c 1 ! 1�0 IIII I j �1L 1 09 tka . I;-� t .W i• a I' o 1 !• ! ka Y• la 11 •Iasi tr . iii: Y. '• Ili a •=r i I�+il ra 7 < ;1; k� YYr 1 1lYr Iv.: q , O Z 4i 1 r �1 I •= ¢ ;1' tr'id ` ,i. ,a. r�r it I 1' 1 'r� V< ! i i ;1 1 Za� h i 'up, 7 p i,; ;III,� I� ;�� p R� 7i{ ! t2s{ ! ;1; ; i.Z I: „, a 0 . Yr rr ,F�_ ._ _ Yti ; •, •rte- T .1 y I- IL I A r R- -• t i i r _ _i•vs `,i-- it .rte :;:1 - w • —7 - - • . - • ;16 - CL La Z 0 Z CO r--, Z • 0 0- 0 it I I M 0 cK Z .1,, o ••••••, •••••?---.......-.......--4 I si,_•;,,_ .----- ' 4,\.....1...r..crs...r..; W I- 4 0,.- I- ---t--1---.--,•'. '• I- M Le.1 0 W -•;-w•L-.:. •-_ ----r•--` _ r_e r*, -.-‘------:------='; .cr.' - • -o 4 2 < w „,--1-.....,,,,,------...-7-.--- • • z. . --eo......„'d ..---• _ - ___ r IX CC x 0 0 in 111111111'---- 1--.`-7,,-..,,,...'i'I.-7119!*,/ !IIII-14-4% • 6.,0.! 1-1---•:-:-, l' a. Z 0 le. : 7 P•1111#7;>- -e-._._,.: _ _/W./: : _• . , ) 1 •:(L__I'ri r_I-17,Ifiitak ,!: 1 a :i , ,'. I, iiii ._____L--___________„..0 ‘.. ''•ji i' '' • - ,.4. •.' .‘ '''--='•-"' -''''--- -- •/' IS,. ,:g..Zis, i ‘1 4:t X O 1••• ' -',7.:7,-:------j.:-.' lc .• .76. _./.A1,,,t‘ip.„ 7-_, .--.• .,... :, 1,N, of , , : , . • -, I : 1 •L .I- IF • • , ... NA: \ . :. • .111 • --. ;: I--' I I I I I • I I I I I Z < W 0 O Z Lai di 1 1 • jo lil 1.1 P :: • P d■IPV \ .: . :Ad°:'. 41. -,.r=1 fi or, / (.7) ,1, - • ..._ • ,,,,i .„ . ,, ,..... -., i 1,Cr. _ r;----ij • 11 1Z1 ;I 1 • .g e chi .1 hi .. ; j ,i.. ..t-:'-', :214-16• ;; Agal.. • 1114k1 t, 1. i I I i 1 • 1 •• ..: , I 1 11 • --' ' - '..-:-::'•• \ :.6.. 'PI -k.:4 ‘.4.4.011'4_____•1 , I,,---j if '. .:,/./r 1 ,-.-;-...\ ..•\. .. /,Agailk.,,_ I '•'I N..,• k ,.: Il.•- , 7 . -. . ‘ \ trjr-' --...1 'll 11 • : 1 • '• . ... iii • . .1 S %1 V (//1// II , .\\,1"I''ni 4■ : . • •:..9__ t tit?, .._,.„.„. 0 •. 0 • a o ),),•1•1/4 ' 4 4 %; lillit■ II _Jr. i,,:....I I' .. I, __ i .:-,-,i •-.- -4,---z------- - - - •---7-----.7-=,- \ , i , I. ),/ ! 1 $ . ,k 7!/ rt. .1 1,.....\ -..-4,,,,,, r • 1 ,,,,.., ____„.:::, a "-/.3 .1,.i•ii ,-•:---- .,(71. k tv _.,, .,, , j ...01.1 .. __ - 4 (..--).1 %,)ii - -. \ • Qo •• 4 .i• \Vill.,-11. I :' • 0 ; lig%..4. i p *, \gi J 1 , . r- :. ..--:....., ....r.-„,_.•.-;;..-=0, 1 ... • ._ ---... .---- _.........„,,,.. .._ , ...., .........-:_.„...--- • ,,,,,,,/,......_...,., , ._ ., 1 i • • . t,,,,, _ . .. . i.-11.010.,.t.stz A\ ■ ..--f.-. • mr• rate !,-•/,,,,, ,r 4/ ,,••••• m ,;, .-, ' . --•' 1114\1■• 'Iti '4/ ;4, 11 , .1 .4. ' " \Ai -:.:Ta0-rt::._;-- ',.''''' . A611.4"IMI. fkis'A ,,\.\, -'7:;;;IVe.•'-',1 ...<7 . •:'., -. - A Aikl44--1 - Li...,1 ! -I' -It '.1.1 : -.--i j' -d n :PI.,,,V"111 • :: . :.( :: ' ,''.'--4,,.N.N • AI il ..-.• . 0 0: • 0 ■ 1 W ' ..'+,,..--, . 1k -_,II , . ... . A V , , 'Ir Ilk - - (l'io. 1 - • . • 1 • p 1 1., • . I • 11 . .' ' L'`..1:-Jai. • ' - \ •i r : I r 1. ,0.1 AR: "MININE40,!, 1. 11! 41I II IMtiri. I il 0 I. II) . 1 ; 1111W - I ,. .0 ,P: . !i,: , . •.... '•n't !----- )17-1-: ;;111411.144-41ka-- 111.1,1111,‘ \ h\ ... ■ • , i .: .s, -: 4. i • 11 :::)Iii : • , 'r- - - ,_ ,l-_,„ ,/,',K-T:47, . 4 "' 4 Allitil*Iik . 11 1.;e514,:e • II ti.... - ''I:. '' .‘....4 1 id • rtije. V 1%r i',".:•,-;-----1_,,OF \k 9' 4 tr.Nt ''. Q..,i'li ri 1, 1 • tyl, 1 s.0., .4.1 /.."-- :,'::":AA411 4 f?",/• \1•:, 0.-1---`‘ 4 // . / /.0 ,"';; '. il C . \Q Irl ii,■Ifift Nit.`.. -.,, :. --::- j));_,;=/ _.. 1 7/ N.--‘,....:'.,-. •-•• i41')', 'A111,1,111 11111Wk ,...1 t.14...1i4. •0. "A".7.-- •-'- 'k‘‘. ,....-- • . ,.___....,...:,A .. ...(\(:::,:t....-....2.).,, ‘,„4,2 .,,,. .- ,,br.=.1,..._, 4 N. ‘ki,,..._1!.. I, • ,z7.,-"--- ----_ _F---- i• i . k7-?;?,0t- _______,.. ,,___.,-:1:.--.-_,7- , iii---/-"/ . , __,,L,..j,,,,,,... ..:::::-..-----,•;lili ,111 , 0-1,.,, ,s4;1" ,t q•-, A II i •el).-^‘ • \ ''\\* 40.11. !" .4 \ • 4 IP :}1 ) ' I • C•1, r---- . , , ,0 i • ot , .....,-,_._ Ns . ..___=,-------- . -.en': 1k It t V 'S" -44114ii\e,- .....----. ---"---"-- - -`- 4111P._,r..--,.. ..,- ...2...,.'0.r.t•.4. n '..:-1111 - . II.tc.:::/r1 f r - fr. i)!' '" 10010011 /tii.... %,--- : a r , .4,1; ',...-..."' I • "•,--:. gro---t 71:::: .1 • • - '- •.... • lo • :" II , /,.t . °•.1 ,,, .4, .. ....: p, * " t.: c 1 ,.... .. i • •- : , \ 1 , . -, 1 111 • • -..„; - . ,....,- il: \ ,,lk I\„ +.... 7 : - Va. ij. *- --7_, I 'r 1 ,-,::'• 1: N' 4....... •A ,$)....s. I I; 1: S o' a .. Ilki,„,:.•'NE 1 :I. ft Iii\es, ""--.*::-....."■.......2 - . . . " , /Ai ri.-ie 1 .. 1 -.... .1' • . )-101 c ., '• --; '11'1-11. ._.... ,e''' L , 1 -•••., -t-- 4,dit.... ... ir.t.1._=•_`,-2.AL-.:._- - - .•- .0' -1 :7.r..., ...„......,„,.. ..*-1'. '''• 47-4'...V . r---- .-' 1 i I ---- .."..#2,........ -T--... ---'. •._ ,, • !L.;:;- '......''....-.---'..."'N, .■4%--- I;•''' . 4.. ^%.i. A.".. .S1 '',:3 . '. . ._',4*:1 ' • I. ,, ),::: c";:j. - .C',,c . I" -S,/,••,•• \t, 1 • 1;40 , ........-'1, • ?. • i,'Ir.-n :1% ..... 47: - - _ 13----1 • cc Lai Z )-< gg V1 Li Ir. m I.A.J I- 1. I- I- L-1 >0 1-‘1 Z • CC V) 'A Li 41 .../ Z n La . X C.3 et < V)Z 14 V/ 0 Z R Li i- < >-- ei 03 •:. •': ,, - ' ,_.— I- m Li CC M "• < m 0 Li- 2.0.suom 1111 ' 63_. I I . LVIOtr - CK /...• r7i 0 ..■...' 1----- 0 Z ' . 0- 4.1 0 l• 1".. . . • • 1 i I I . I CC 6 > • ' . , t3' 10 • 1 1 • . 1 C.) (t) it . o Li :' 17171 go..: . - I i ' LI g x • q, ..! :,-::-.........—•-...:,; ' .: ,-,.. 1.4 V) I, iN---___. 4.1% it ; l'. : \,,; i 19,, ... --,. Ly 1 -4-1 = ce I--- '.%," '--. '1 lo......c 1 ' ‘ \`‘:----• 1 'I ' re ),Vt'...t. /7) ----1 -...... ° k 1 1 — Z ..9.-71-.; Qj • , .N. C I .',. r '',... 0 ss 1/.11 r .1 , / 1 , le ; ., / - 1 I C \f I;Bik \ Q^r ' ` 'st 44 nj Z 12.1 • 1 el I i gi II ,■ AS47 I° 1 11 „ 1 ts,1 1 11 11 1 ,... wpm, .1 p....9 , 1 -- i 1• -- \ : , i! : 10 0 I • _ r1 .. o 0 _ '',.,„.,. : L__ . if,Fi , I/ 1 ooti i 4 .: 1 .. i le % °1 i . g k 1/4 :1.7, dIQ ,,.) C.3 41 1 71' / !' b;,,‘ le . I il ri ° ' o \--Licb 0 ...)IIE i 1 c.. . ., .. i___, •,, ,•41•132,.1 • . A21.11.016 -.--- I ---covirr- / • ...” /1?;-*-7:".1.1.I .' . —•. , I sii.ox / 1' • --.''. 1.'' -.-.I AL &I si le k '.. • – 7)/ = I / ,; • -;;4. 10:44 le I i. 0...... lo i 0 '.....,:. . I 1 •.,..../ i f' 0 1 .,.r. i 4,„. , . .., .....te.. a .., , ...., , 7 --,• • ......- ',. ; . iv. oa . /At%'1 7-"•,•'"), --, J 1.60 fil-:,41=0241KEIV$3i., • 4 ,-- 111111,t.gr• ',I, 1''''' , `;', °°:.) 4. , ......-4 liu:11.. . JP '•..", -.1- 7.710 ..2 0 e? rt--3,, .---. ..„ k 14411 01" 1, ...,..„--,—.; I . . .fro„. li t. 11 • .04 AIN _ It : WI 14. ' 3 7] • . i . i ii • . q /; I( , 't..-if Vc3 Ait Ii):. • ii, C.S-----'-' ) N-- . -----....,............--,-----.- c 0 , \ I. I\ . a ' ../0; I _L) 10...44(14 ,. -.ex );(14:C>. le "46,-..\ .., As-e- 't ; • . t • 4,1§ ' .4•••• ' --•■,..---.....=....„ , ,,,,.,f ..,,,,:i'cilk . 3 A' :.°•--..V.: i r,.. le ,..; , 1 i --- i, • 4 1 o "C' .. ---:.,- J / ,. a.•,i , . ,-- l I ;1 :.z- /.---'..\\ ! /.‘ ce'• 't• / ' ‘.11. 0144:1240:* ,,, • a ' • c k /I ! 7 • 10 •t.141ZI...;4ge I i _ • me-V::: ' t 1 ...9.•- •,:.:.0 1 -.4..........401.j.I 1 . ,,.. •,'• .......... . ......... .... .... . ... . ........ ...........ii° --- 11 ‘,.../ •:•,.,„„„ to 11 :le le i -1''.a 1irz •--- -- I \ ., 1 ,..•a: 1 I \ \ Ili cl 1. • 1 • Ia. It 1 • -.... / „.., ,..! . ( g °I 11 ' :5 : 'eit\N .... .. ..--**.., '.........-------• , I - •,.., s I 1 0 i el I 11 100 1 0 01 il Ele Pi ,..... ,... \■\ i I ----.............-- ro ,.. 1/4, goi o 1 m I L i I.;, • . i .. °*"-, /.• ,°°I e 10 o • t : \:\ ''..:Ti.'1. ',/ le • I • o sjo \`;.,.. 1... ...rirt..• ... Ile lei I *sc•- i -1 - r. 1! ' -404 14.. 0.--1.1 . ,\ 010,° 0113W j I I , WA '•- -0-..1 1 I 0 k‘i V 1000 CAL tictiffil it 10 401 it I—, • .., /I i . m 1 1 ,,i0t•irit:40%, i Igo. ,0J , tat . 00,,,4 ,10 10„ ° " .011a 0,1 IAA' to0c----- 0 0 , , 0 ei • — ..,.. 301•13AV t,...7....."NOM= I 1.1.1 i i Pt F.—......-........ 1 ii ......... 11 • . NI ! . k.." . I -.....•---q--------- �,pp W Z a w z CO CD ONO,CH 14 ILL te ^ ��Qtt Eomm��_ 1— y. „�,:gIi o7m z J 4 .; a t ,2�mrnmo'8r8^o W J Z ' o f o`l^- y34,,.3 .o V V n 3 ` Q CO a i • W T +ate, +-i }'``�,• + 0 + 0 0) ,O,6,p'a-a a gi n : Q n � _` 0 I. ° ,\.� ,-I - p p �� NNONNNm4I4 W W 0 0 0 0° ; I i o ° rr—� Z din na°,�nnn� O Z W O. ° ° ° ( "✓Jy b ° oo I I 1 a re W In LLI I N CZ 1 0 —J W I nl l�:!4o W 1,►—►= j — n�n9i v,Bonn W 3 /:,�, 1 t �oo + J l? li�'t/� O� 1111�`F ° >m c 7� + no�o n$gti Q CI O I • ICA i O I I i0 / t /i i`i I o I o.•'o Z 1 r �`- O 1 `� ,�'`"� o /i t L� "&":1P.:-""17: W �► lb / It. + 1 — .�F'u --J1 , r o o r o \we (1 f !/ ,I ,"•c -sV f to is . I 1 /^��a 1 1` ° i e JI 1 -P I 1 0° ca a I o ®` rJ - o �/ j j t 1 a •tj (t a `�• 1••o( ,� ii a 11 li c-il eft,,,,,&\A / 1 i• -t ' ,• 101 ,\ t-i k\ d• ....� ,1 II , i41 Y t.% 1/ 1,to r-r. `=/ I, ° d' o- °�►te, • �.." o ry/ {,t : I I I v �7 , ,\ ,\ 1\1 G A i• I c-,`' I I t-. .—. .r{.-_/�`,'/ I p I 1 0 o b:I 0 I 1 I 1 . +r F; - f J /, a a ♦; 41i, ; °°t t0 r 1 CC \• }i/� i i „,./ .$' ;.to 1Y 1 a a / �,' �� r- , I , O n \` ,7 / �� 1 �LJ + 00 t._ J --`-"t r~��� �/ //i. �l A. - a a- a i1 :�� \ i 111 e i o, ..k.• - i l�` `� \tip °�11 10 i'�Io�1 ,I 0 �:. ' its jor,\h \•� 1`; 0 11 1 //t-',41 SDI Ob 1: o °\ L.-_ 1 1 1 d t • ' `` `_` ''..�,:r Vi i• �� /" 1d • •1 I I p / �� ``� ``__...�ti� `4—_ _ + .., I' it 1' / •/ ,�'., ° morls,w of — ��.� 1. / co1 IyI ,� 4 oill.i .:, '.,%.`; ',cP \\\ i i 1 1• Ie 1 I• 1 • . . t t .�∎` I I I t I °"f° t 0 d 1 1 ,I L' 1 I l�°• •• .�\ I 11 'G `u- 1%.12 , 1,! r l o Y;t,°jiiii .1.� 11 I 11 }°o .L, a`. PITS I ; / I c ott li I I I� - i �� r 0 ,atte. J:- �'. . ggigggO I) I:; : .--L J 7 ;; i I 1, 1 `t 1 °I°1'&odr,! ° ,°� .. .. C!! 1I ''' . i ° • 1 '1 �'I " ' �`YOOI;\��'f- 'o ,., -.,/? o �........ 1- •—1 --L._•��t�k.!..:.__s• B.2 787 B7B• it ' -30 ai:a I R441%2- ji ,� 8 IAW( 12 N 0 rii • I '1 -1: 1\`�` _• a rrr. •.. NNW L.$r30 a S.Q. -�o •E:A 2 -•t3 1/ ! �. E {Y DALE 2 °IroDl�s_, .� EAC,AN At43O L.$.- .\O±-. pit ..Xi Mir ,' 884p u/� +`' SER EE4 ' r. • 0 I OA\ • .: 8.0 •r- t 4.._8 . • r=�.rA• DP-13 I _ I - 882.0 \z, 111.--1- 2.7 884.5 • ( / 8 B S 857.3 r1I1ry1 856 1 - ao se.III 866.5 `I 864 --m ., iir R, D-_ 876 JEP•3‘3 E-c - E-b 836.; ti/ 877.2I •A.Q6 67 6.Q L.S.-7 ��� �� NO.5 1 G( 878. - c 3 - 3 y N I a•• R• 014 M -s CO. •R I' Iw 28 I C-9 42 )� l I& ,Cio t ONE * 'T�}y S _-•I.MR ••- - '� 27 -1418 l., J 3 DP-2 CCN RE 2NC. 8'• " 862.8 ��t\11,��'� �.� HILLS ■V'I"901.d W 1 +v,N 100 A00. TOWN ;2 1 904. i • r 6 :t Q ---c .__..:t-o — CENTRE �Za8 qq;I l • . -08®2o-L S ' ∎' ' sEfor - 70 j 89 .6 Ell ' , ;q 1sT 0-w - ?876.0 :e I u..f: 15. f TIV4 CE R w �rr'i � )r-,��"' - S -tk, GOLF rAR1EN 0/%14 14 70 FtRST� I . .9 �;3` . 0 11C ,.. �73.8SE EP-2 I 1330 g�g�' ../L or l .1 ,r -�882. —864.3 .. �50A• • - ,0 870.1r i. . ji,' G"1f r la'III 4 �, �JP 59 „ �IODl3t1�J• c PROJECT SITE • -7 FIGURE No. 17 - STORM • SEWER LAYOUT LEGEND ' POMOt OAREA$ MAP n011■1 SEWERS WM". STORM SEMIS••••••••. ♦------ STORM LIFT STATION f..I.•r) . • . • STORM L•T STATION DoNI..• 0 STORY FORGE MAN ..4...40.40,40 CITY OF OIVISION — — . /ONO mama WATER LEVEL. . . . . . . 900.0 EAGANIi POND WON MATER LEVEL OVERLAND oRAAE err • .900.0 =a a s s s-.a .. 'r r 4-1:,- -4 j . _ — - Ili 6".5/82.0, N `� ` 64 0 ,.49. ..1 •a '- ''' li° •+ -1.48 a.� I . 12 \ E r. d--- 1 I6" C. 23 1 / _1 1 16"ll ?.�t,A 6 16 L '1�'tK I P4A .]. 2i - I..__- �- . -POPP E.S� n it .T.8 • a I 1"' L.�. r ' 140M i. • •: . `� t R o . •l 1i' 16 —u i' r 6A p P` 12" ie --� 111 iI 1 ir�l• 1 I(I1 ►1�; .'�r A. �c / W 52 53 54 \ I II 1 �! , 1. 7 3/ 72.5/ 78.0 930 91.0 1 ��ti1� � i �,;, U.S. POSTAL I �1 �I '4�� 11 • _ �I �,"` SERVICE 51 c.TAB 4 '529/69. 9.0 /vL, . m A; 8" _A I.4.3 .0 �`' 1, `2=r• 6.0 I 1 —to ,,_,.. _ 1 it..- ))DI710N/, / ' 11 r e / etv % -+e CENT' r 1 ■ 1 12"' -11 18 •12 1 • TAIAI8T'A .may O. V - • • ; I-111111_2 1 ‘ 1/73.0 J ,� ' 176.AI 54: /.=.0 /- 67.0 94/62.0 61.1 75.0 67.8/72.0 N05 -' 8=.0 6 i ,/�-' 20/ N ,18"r '@ nAn 18" 61 18" .L��Q$" R1i » 28 18" I , 20" I. �20 ' I I I (21` . 187 � ./ � HILLS /26,.)T. y �, `I 1 LPJJ 12" r 1}.{, 8w 74.0 1�IN H -6 wv'' S1 .TH tyLEA•, P 69.0 AQOITI• Ca\ r 1 I . ..-_ .RRIAGE - .i r 1 r raiii� ' f� 115 ' ILLF 1 1C' i,A) C• �` �' CO 'SE LOT5 /�,jtc !w .1 *�• V CKWOOD _ M•M J��--- -1 24 . ' -g ,► * TLS 6" " /.. . - .. .._ . . • PROJECT SITE• FJG. NO. 8 r . WATER DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM CITY OF ' SAGA 1 ir --- • • • / ( N - T IA T C .A rt�sf/1 11i L LI�H Br-- I I�LONE K ROAD � ' -I.,–rcal, /7 irfr3 . _!_*iiiii 4"A- I I It I \ -- • T / GANpA �l� 1=.._� .,t;,� R?'� l"��►Nl<`R1TT�T ' itT.H.w r / %NOV __ 801 ' 11111 U.S. POSTAL ' Z•r .) ‘ SERVICE ' 8_J• . 41) ,, . w ON ll I -J� e . , , , _____]... ........ ..... ..„‘_ i, , , co - , . o 01 , L _ /Vin •E't1 1)q�_E ROAD " -—V j� fcO "- ! I - a- -- 111,1117--1.17 I 8W f -2- ---+ 'r -._ Ti.: I • R W HILLS i I 0'L •• ARK AQOITIO Q WESjCOTT ' 90 II , CA RIAGE I J I. �I ' 6 • P� , ILLS I C-H2 �;ti -I. S. .(.:., ELF I GARQEN N �W L T5 —�� "RC R74c5' *S�i fit.jç nv 1 1 it: -t.W� r� TRAILS;leis 4 ..... , 115 4.3 ....-.1`0700 0 wi:0111 P- 411146"" I if %.-—21—As T.9' A?A-.. , =- _ - = . . -. -. - • • PROJECT SITE FIG. NO. 7 SANITARY SEWER TRUNK LAYOUT CITY OF • E . . ,y . _ 14.1 Z 1- �' l 1 rr -r I-r -I r -- rT i r7 -1 r r I I- — W 11 I I'•:.1 1 1=1 1 1 1 I I t I ' 1 1 Z -J z D. Z lb 111 ' 11 ' 1 '.14 1I 1 ' I ' I ' I ` 1 1 ' 1 ' 1 ' 1 ' I hit T m r, C4 V' 1 I I I I ":•:. I z I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I +l.i FW'- = iai Z r CO II cc ATAf�T.T•7�T�LTf.T. .T.1�.+4i.• �ri. Le::u','•:: W.J.I.tiu::,:... , •:;,:::;w.::;:;:•:44:4v`•:w'�•:*:--_—J . i'* {; cc W ct ■g N• 1 • :�: :• ':; :•:•::::;:; y. .},�.?• ::::::::::$:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::t;:; I ilii ;I 0 t- o- f-14 us •1:::%•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•....:y...........:•:.v:• ' :i •:::•:}\�:::•:.;:: : :•:•:p:•:::ti::•:%::} W Z Iw►;iw::;$:::w::;%:;4$$:;;;S rrr. •.. •Z::::r•rer'•is•)--——--� r y -� = a N• • rt ..;�r:•;:Mw, w.... dA•,:w 1 Ix....:44::;;;;;::44:04:14:34::::: :*—• ',• _-•- t' .' Z Z , t riv• •f4,1:::::44.:4::::A:::::!:i4�Y11•.w.i ..rr. IS:'••.;' �.;:; $4. .i;.Lfi:�1::}1,'i, . ——-•l 0�1 r �f r.r., 1 I.t, • as*...::;:e::::::::::::::::§i:::::::::::::::::::11 i::::::::::::.:.:.:......:V.::•61:::t::::::::::::::::•::) oi. i11:••':••: • •;•;••;•;•,,ljC•. ,.;.;.;.;: : ;.}::• ::: ••:x.::y..x . I A — t+lj�' , 1 �. :• :istiii i,::i;i;:;iti;i:;i r:i;i i:'▪ { i;''+ ;i: ?;i,tij:• 3 r::r :) "� 0 ' • ! s i I' My ti• i***::**:w:*;$:*4: ' ''1 r:C1: 7:.:iti:i;::7::▪ R;M::?•�'.::•4— --•••'I i r i Till h 1 to Iciw;••w;vti.�;:w�'rw;:w:vw•▪ ,. ,'OG.,•da}••,i,.ti7GJ.;0:;.;P,C;%?9;.;►?XJA, ! >�{ 11 ; )s (I S. IA I I I i It !:!:;:C;:::;w:::::::,w,,:;�;►•:w:;. .}, ..tir:;:;:;:;:M'r .�.}w:w:;:w:tititi::— -- soli� � i1�{i �� � { 111._. u •.::,.....:-..x.......:.:.:,.........:.:.:.::::.:.,1} •:+:.x.'..x.:} ,. :c.: :.: ;.tiJhi:.:.:4:;.}:•:::• �''' t "itt' 1!t ti 1 lilt • •▪:• .):.:.:6..::.....:.......:.....:..44::.....:.a:::::::. •: _..I.• O)}�ii I lU I! f ui � _ :: :;::: :i:: N ;:u: :, : .,.; .. . —_• • t: •.•..•..•... .: :... I *IMP gut 1t" r —I j ii ` MI i. 1 ,,,� 044.4.4L$ �, \ II jf i slla�sinq;,ll magi I i :: I sa I \ II 1 'uraianrrm 1 — 1 I \ ' G j 1imn/uliill —r,— —51!!43 1 f ) Ipi. • .1 tl:tliitllillil jjj III' .•.........a.nr ST >I ` 1,' i ..•♦ i!11111713133113 . ° I 'r/' 1 1� I% ; • m t I . \\ .' I 'r '• ai 3i ,! 1 l I I I q n.ij i I 1 ! ' t •g iI� g I!1 h II . : .isa1agar __ t ill r 7�.r r • .. I. I • . . 1, 1 us. , r ♦, 1 1 1 ill!31!!13 11 { T ): ' T l 1 i-Z.��i'1'---�..Jr �� 1 •1,1_ J 1 -- %. • 1 p . ' _'',1 t 4 1i-��I La.•_- • •1• 1 ' A - -• i ....;-- - 1 %..... • a i ..• .. ,,. .16..,...........,..) i , /1 . .‘% .fkjorni, %ate),,E x rIi • ---- --•1 V ;.I 1 I rI « •i --- r.-r1-17 •^• • - - II N —•i ai l 1 I lI 1 l 1 '�-'--'71 II 11 I I II y,„ „.......„ . .1.----jt—_--Jl-_�-1�.---Jlr---�---J L .'! JL -s��1� _ �l� _ r- WOW AIL.... a 3,'.34f Weil .Cti..77 . ►t 1 IM{v , 1 _ W N 'r-r-r-�— r � r— r-r -- r-r —�— r— r W I I I I'' I 1 1"I I i l l I I I I i W ,, z °' i id I ' I I ` I ' I °.If ISI ' I ` I ' I ` i I ' I ° I I " I 31;1.:1 cs �' I I I I ^ I •��;. I4I I I I I I I 1 I I �i ! W i °0 I- ° •A%. - \ � ° 1+ !1 d Z W IV r- , ,_ , 1 I r -�l a;l V W If W e I . I , s W W • 1•— d — t————1 w _t z N • .•t•• ▪ r 1, ry •r. cc 41C Z r-- • - ---'•.:: _---•----1 " .. Z 1 CD i - % i .3 - --- il- - ("TV- _...i ----1 ,.. . : - _ F —— I . it—c----""7"...:.. Ili J——— • .. .•__ o W--•g 1 • '••� x _ i p t �! 4. -- °5- "I. - 3••• :� _ I ?11 I , ill II I II; qi": s ' .:sic'- ., ' ��1�i 1 i ':� _& --i- -_ �;... n1ir111 U l i I 0 ,� r. i>�a�t,a� illa 2 AL :4r . li 1 '�� 1 �s H `t\.� ,,.its. V r 1 1 l I1111.1.Pi U11} I \ 11 s1 ;14............ —�t t I I -iMU111iK • I �• ) I. • fY.fiilllS!!•"ii 1 T •' U.•••• im/ r l •.rte I: ..•.`,•ibrx, : 1! 1; 1'• I. .rl J fief r l ::M1 u1I 'I •1 t t::1,y S i i Y t V. s r .Z a l .�•:��•••::•••:•••:•:•}::::::tom:�':•::�••:':•:�••:::�:`. t ��/• :•f r d HIM 1I�� Y .r g I•: s ::91 't i r.. r s '�1S Ir r u 0 t� s r t ii u 1•: y _• a • +y+ i I t• v': :�T I, a< . !1!l�7f �al� i :i 4. is :.•.,i:: •DID :•:•: �:•,:;, ..:4•.:41.• ••,••/ ..rr::•.. .r� .5. 1:• .j : ,r 1• 'ti .!• _ o: i P I:• . . _. It _ I ��1! 1 ':i V. �:4Y. •• IE S a: 11 —NN',':: : +(: :;:�• 1 M�• .... •�Olafwr 74.1&:.,:r.•: .•'�1 I S— --- '--r..,:•:%:::•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•..... :�' .. .... •••' « sd y . •.1 • ill• •:I' :; le 'S 1 11 11 1 ::} :} • I} . r• 0 X31 ' if- Agenda Information Memo May 15, 1995 Eagan City Council Meeting I. PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION - EAGANDALE CENTER INDUSTRIAL PARK NO. 12 ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: 1. To approve or deny a Preliminary Subdivision (Eagandale Center Industrial Park No. 12) consisting of two lots on 11.86 acres located on the north side of Trapp Road, south of I-494 in the northeast quarter of Section 3 subject to the eleven conditions recommended by the Advisory Planning Commission. FACTS: • NW Mutual Life Insurance Company is requesting approval of this Preliminary Plat on land that is guided for industrial development and zoned I-1. • The Advisory Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on this proposed subdivision at its meeting of April 25, 1995 and recommends approval subject to conditions. BACKGROUND/ATTACHMENTS: (2) Advisory Planning Commission minutes oo age 333 through...53(1 'Staff report on page..1.35 througl�--�, i—f' • Page 27 April 25, 1995 ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION EAGANDALE CENTER INDUSTRIAL PARK NO. 12 PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION Chairperson Miller opened the next public hearing of the evening regarding a Preliminary Subdivision (Eagandale Center Industrial Park No. 12) consisting of two lots on 11.86 acres located on the north side of Trapp Road south of I-494 in the NE1/4 of Section 3. Project Planner Tyree introduced this item. Ms. Tyree concluded that the proposal is consistent with City Code standards. Dale Huber, representative of the applicant, had no comment. No persons from the public were present. Member Wallace moved, Isberg seconded a motion to recommend approval of a Preliminary Subdivision (Eagandale Center Industrial Park No. 12) consisting of two lots on 11.86 acres located on the north side of Trapp Road south of I-494 in the NE1/4 of Section 3, subject to the following conditions: Standard Conditions 1. The developer shall comply with these standard conditions of plat approval as adopted by Council on February 3, 1993: Al, B 1, B2, B3, Cl, C2, C4, D1, El, Fl and H1 2. The future development of this plat subdivision will be required to construct 3 foot berming along the north property line to screen Interstate 494. 3. The future development of this site will be required to submit a detailed grading, drainage, and erosion control plan to the City prior to issuance of grading or building permit. 4. The future development of Lot 1 will need to construct a six-inch or eight-inch line across Trapp Road with hydrants on this site to improve the fire protection to this site. 5. The new driveway connections to Trapp Road will need to. be constructed with concrete aprons. 6. The sanitary sewer layout will need to include a manhole on the sewer service at the property line to provide the City with an inspection monitoring structure. 21 Page 28 April 25, 1995 ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION 7. The final plat shall dedicate a ten-foot drainage and utility easement around the outside edges of this development. 8. The final plat shall dedicate drainage and utility easement for the future storm sewer line that will extend across the north edge of Lot 2 to serve Lot 1. 9. The future development will be required to construct their parking lot with a bituminous or concrete surface and concrete curb and gutter around the outside edge of the lot. 10. This plat shall be subject to a cash parks and a cash trail dedication. 11. The property shall be platted. All approved in favor, except Member Carlson who was absent from the vote. PLANNING REPORT CITY OF EAGAN REPORT DATE: April 19, 1995 CASE: 3-PP-7-2-95 APPLICANT: Northwestern Mutual Life Insur. HEARING DATE: April 25, 1995 PROPERTY OWNER: Same as applicant PREPARED BY: Shannon Tyree REQUEST: Preliminary Plat - Eagandale Center Industrial Park No. 12 LOCATION: South of 494, North.o'f Trapp Road, in the North half of Section 3. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: IND - Limited Industrial ZONING: I-1 - Limited Industrial SUMMARY OF REOUEST The Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance Company is requesting a Preliminary Plat of two lots on 11.8616 acres. The site is located in the west of 35E north of Trapp Road south of 494 in the NE & NW 1/4 of Section 3. AUTHORITY FOR REVIEW City Code Section 13.20 Subd. 6 states that "In the case of platting, the Planning Commission and the Council shall be guided by criteria, including the following, in approving, denying or establishing conditions related thereto:" A. That the proposed subdivision does comply with applicable City Code provisions and the Comprehensive Guide Plan. B. That the design or improvement of the proposed subdivision complies with applicable plans of Dakota County, State of Minnesota, or the Metropolitan Council. C. That the physical characteristics of the site including but not limited to, topography, vegetation, susceptibility to erosion and siltation, susceptibility to flooding, water storage, and retention are such that the site is suitable for the type of development or use contemplated. D. That the site physically is suitable for the proposed density of the development. E. That the design of the subdivision or the proposed improvements is not likely to cause environmental damage. 335 Eagandale Center Industrial Park No. 12 • April 25, 1995 Page 2 F. That the design of the subdivision or the type of improvements is not likely to cause health problems. G. That the design of the subdivision or the improvements will not conflict with easements of record or with easements established by judgement of court. H. That completion of the proposed development of the subdivision can be completed in a timely manner so as not to cause an economic burden upon the City for maintenance, repayment of bonds or similar burden. I. That the subdivision has been properly planned for possible solar energy system use within the subdivision or as it relates to adjacent property. (Refer to City Handbook on Solar Access). 7. That the design of public improvements for the subdivision is compatible and consistent with the platting or approved preliminary plat on adjacent lands. K. That the subdivision is in compliance with those standards set forth• in that certain document entitled "City of Eagan Water Quality Management Plan for the Gun Club Lake Watershed Management Organization" which document is properly approved and filed with the office of the City Clerk hereinafter referred to as the "Water Quality Management Plan". Said document and all of the notations, references and other information contained therein shall have the same force and effect as if fully set down • herein and is hereby made a part of this Chapter by reference and incorporated herein as fully as if set forth herein at length. It shall be the responsibility of the City Clerk to maintain the Water Quality Management Plan and make the same available to the public. BACKGROUND/HISTORY Prior to this application the proposed plat was three lots; two platted into the Eagandale Center Industrial Park and one as a lot of record (never platted). SURROUNDING USES The following existing uses, zoning, and comprehensive guide plan designations surround the subject property: North - Interstate 494. South - Applied Power Pro. & Phoenix Intl; zoned I-1; guided IND. East - Opus Corporation; zoned I-1; guided IND. • West - Vendmark; zoned I-1; guided IND. • Eagandale Center Industrial Park No. 12 April 25, 1995 Page 3 EVALUATION OF REOUEST Introduction. The developer is requesting the plat to combine three parcel of land to make two lots. Prior to this plat, two of the lots being combined were previously platted (Lot 15, Block 1, Eagandale Center Industrial Park and Lot 1, Block 8, Eagandale Center Industrial Park). The largest lot to be combined has remained as an unplatted parcel until this proposal. Preliminary Nat. Lots. The proposed plat indicates two lots. Lot 1 is 7.762 acres (338,131 s.f.) and Lot 2 is 4.099 acres (178,561 s.f.) Tree Preservation An individual tree preservation plan will be required for this development at the time of Grading/Building Permit Application. Grading/Wetlands - The developer does not intend to do any grading with this application. The easterly portion of this site has been partially graded with the construction of the Trapp Road Business Park that was located to the east of this site. The developer will be responsible for properly restoring any disturbed portions of this site to prevent future erosion problems from occurring. The future development of this site will be required to construct berming along the north property line to help screen from Interstate 494. •The future development of this site will be required to submit a detailed grading, drainage, and erosion control plan to the City prior to issuance of a grading or building permit. Storm Drainage/Water Quality - Storm water runoff from this development will be required to be conveyed to Pond HP-9 which is located in the northeast corner of this site. The storm water runoff from this development plus the adjacent Trapp Road Business Park was designed to drain to Pond HP-9. The attached letter dated October 4, 1994 addressed to Mr. Dale Huber addresses the design and sizing requirements for Pond HP-9. The pond was constructed in the Fall of 1994 • ----- by Opus and the Pond was constructed to the City's requirements. Water Quality Water Quality requirements have already been satisfied for this development through the construction of Pond HP-9, so no additional mitigation-is required. There are no jurisdictional wetlands within the development. Utilities - An existing nine-inch sanitary sewer is available in Trapp Road to provide sewer service to this development. Four six-inch sewer services were stubbed to this site when the nine-inch sanitary sewer was constructed in Trapp Road in 1967. The sanitary sewer layout will need to include a manhole on the sewer service at the property line to provide the City with an inspection and monitoring structure. S 7 Eagandale Center Industrial Park No. 12 April 25, 1995 Page 4 An eight-inch water main is available to serve this site from the south side of Trapp Road or along the east property line of this site. The Trapp Road Business Park project stubbed an eight- inch water main to the east property line of Lot 2 and that project also provided a hydrant in the north east corner of Lot 2 to help provide fire protection to the future development of Lot 2. The future development of Lot 1 will need to cross Trapp Road to connect to the existing eight-inch water main and construct a six-inch or eight-inch line across Trapp Road. The new line will need to include hydrants to provide improved fire protection to the future development on Lot 1. Access-The development will have street access provided to it from Trapp Road which is a four lane publicly maintained street. The new driveway connections to Trapp Road will need to be constructed with concrete aprons. The future development will be required to construct their parking lot with a bituminous or concrete surface and concrete curb and gutter around the outside edge of the lot. Easements/Right-of-Way/Permits - An eighty-foot wide Northern States Power easement is located across the west edge of Lot 2. Any work performed within this easement will need to obtain a permit from Northern States Power. The final plat shall dedicate a ten-foot drainage and utility easement around the outside edges of this development. The final plat shall also dedicate a drainage and utility easement across the north portion of Lot 2 to allow for the future extension of a storm sewer line that will serve Lot 1 and convey the storm water runoff to Pond HP-9. Parks and Recreation This plat shall be subject to a cash parks and a cash trails dedication. SUMMARY/CONCLUSION The proposed platting of Eagandale Center Industrial Park #12 is consistent with the Findings required for subdivision approval. Site Plan review will occur with the Building/Grading Permit when application is made. ACTIONS TO BE CONSIDERED To recommend approval/denial of the requested preliminary plat of two lots for Eagandale Center Industrial Park #12 . If approval of the plat is recommended it shall be subject to the following conditions: Standard Conditions • 1. The developer shall comply with these standard conditions of plat approval as adopted by Council on February 3, 1993: Al, B1, B2, B3, Cl, C2, C4, D1, El, Fl and H1 Eagandale Center Industrial Park No. 12 April 25, 1995 Page 5 2. The future development of this plat subdivision will be required to construct 3 foot berming along the north property line to screen Interstate 494. 3. The future development of this site will be required to submit a detailed grading, drainage, and erosion control plan to the City prior to issuance of grading or building permit. 4. The future development of Lot 1 will need to construct a six-inch or eight-inch line across Trapp Road with hydrants on this site to improve the fire protection to this site. 5. The new driveway connections to Trapp Road will need to be constructed with concrete aprons. 6. The sanitary sewer layout will need to include a manhole on the sewer service at the property line to provide the City with an inspection monitoring structure. 7. The final plat shall dedicate a ten-foot drainage and utility easement around the outside edges of this development. 8. The final plat shall dedicate drainage and utility easement for the future storm sewer line that will extend across the north edge of Lot 2 to serve Lot 1. 9. The future development will be required to construct their parking lot with a bituminous or concrete surface and concrete curb and gutter around the outside edge of the lot. 10. This plat shall be subject to a cash parks and a cash trail dedication. • ,..5v � STANDARD CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL A. Financial Obligations 1. This development shall accept its additional financial obligations as defined in the staff's report In accordance with the final plat dimensions and the rates in effect at the time of final plat approval. B. Easements.and Rights-of-Way 1. This development shall dedicate 10-foot drainage and utility easements centered over all lot lines and, in addition, where necessary to accommodate existing'or proposed utilities for drainage ways within the plat. The development shall dedicate easements of sufficient width and location as determined necessary by engineering standards. 2. This development shall dedicate, provide, or financially guarantee the acquisition costs of drainage;ponding, and utility easements in addition to public street rights-of-way as required by the alignment, depth, and storage capacity of all required public utilities and streets located beyond the boundaries of this plat as necessary to service or accommodate this development. • 3. • This development shall dedicate all public right-of-way and temporary slope easements for ultimate development of adjacent roadways as required by the appropriate jurisdictional agency. 4. This development shall dedicate adequate drainage and ponding easements • to incorporate the required high water elevation plus three (3) feet as • necessitated by storm water storage volume requirements. • C. Plans and Specifications • 1. All public and private streets, drainage systems and utilities necessary to provide service to this development shall be designed and certified by a . registered professional engineer in accordance with City adopted codes, engineering standards, guidelines and policies prior to application for final plat approval. 2. A detailed grading, drainage, erosion, and sediment control plan must be prepared in accordance with current City standards prior to final plat approval. 3. This development shall ensure that all dead-end public streets shall have a cul-de-sac constructed in accordance with City engineering standards. • • 4. A separate detailed landscape plan shall be submitted overlaid on the proposed grading and utility plan. The financial guarantee for such plan shall be included in the Development Contract and shall not be released until one year after the date of City certified compliance. D. Public improvements .1. If any improvements are to be installed under a City contract, the appropriate project must be approved by Council action prior to final plat approval. • E. perrnits 1. This development shall be responsible for the acquisition of all regulatory agency permits required by the affected agency prior to final plat approval. F. Parks and Trails Dedication 1. This development shall fulfill its park and trail dedication requirements as recommended by the Advisory Parks, Recreation and Natural Resource Commission and approved by Council action. G. Water Quality Dedication 1. This development shall be responsible for providing a cash dedication, pending, or a combination thereof in accordance with the criteria identified in the City's Water Quality Management Plan, as recommended by the Advisory Parks, Recreation and Natural Resource Commission and approved by Council action. H. Other 1. All subdivision,zoning and other ordinances affecting this development shall be adhered to, unless specifically granted a variance by Council action. Advisory Planning Commission City Council Approved: August 25. 1987 _ September 15. 1987_ Revised: July 10. 199p Revised: _February 2. 1993 • LTS#S 31-7/ STANDARD.CON FINANCIAL OBLIGATION - Eagandale Center Industrial Park #12 There are pay-off balances of special assessments totaling $0 on the parcels proposed for platting. The pay-off balance will be allocated to the lots created by the plat. At this time, there are no pending assessments on the parcel proposed for platting. The estimated financial obligation presented is subject to change based upon areas,dimensions and land uses contained in the final plat. Based upon the study of the financial obligations collected in the past and the use proposed for the property, the following charges are proposed. The charge is computed using the City's current fee schedule and the connection and availability of the City's utility system. Improvement Use Rate Quantity Amount None C' city of ocigcin THOMAS EGAN Mayor PATRICIA AWADA October 4, 1994 • SHAWN HUNTER SANDRA A.MASIN • THEODORE WACHTER • Council Members Mr. Dale E. Huber, Regional Manager THOMAS HEDGES Northwestern Mutual Life City Administrator Real Estate Investment Office E.J. VAN OVERBEKE 8400 Normandale Lake Blvd., Suite 1490 cny Clerk Bloomington, MN 55437 Re: Trapp Road Business Park City Project#94-BP-FF Pond HP-9 Dear Dale: The City has reviewed the storm water drainage and water quality ponding requirements for the lots along the north side of Trapp Road from Highway 55 to Corporate Center Drive. The drainage study was performed during the review of the Trapp Road Business Park, City Project#94-BP-FF, to allow for the construction of Pond HP-9. The following is a table showing the areas draining to Pond HP-9: Descriotion ALta Zoning a s$ Trapp Road Business Park Lots 2, 3, 4 & 5 Blk 8 of E.C.I.P. 8:3 Ac. Ind. 0.75 6.2 Pond HP-9 will be in rear area of these lots Lot 1 of Blk 8 of E.C.I.P. Gas Line is 3.3 Ac. 'Ind. 0.75 2.5 along west edge of this lot Parcel 00300-010-05 _ 6.3 Ac. Future 0.75 4.7 Unplatted parcel Ind. When this area is platted, ponding will be required. However, Opus wants to use Pond HP-9 for its ponding requirements. Part of Lot 15 of E.C.I.P. 2.1 Ac. Ind. 0.75 1.6 There is no storm sewer adjacent to this lot. Opus intends to extend storm sewer to this lot and have it • drain to Pond HP-9. Subtotal • 20.0 Ac. 15.0 MUNICIPAL CENTER THE LONE OAK TREE MAINTENANCE FACILITY 3830 PILOT KNOB ROAD 3501 COACHMAN POINT THE SYMBOL OF STRENGTH AND GROWTH IN OUR COMMUNITY EGGAN.MINNESOTA 551224897 EAGAN,MINNESOTA 55122 PHONE:(612)681.4600 PHONE:(612)681.4300 FAX(612)681.4612 Equal Opportunity/Aff rmatIve Action Employer FAX:(612)681.4360 TDD:(612)454-8535 e3 /l.l TDD:(612)454.8535 Mr. Dale Huber October 4, 1994 Page 2 The approximately 20 acres of industrial zoned land draining to Pond HP-9 can be accommodated in this pond provided it meets the following requirements: Pond ' Wet Pond Storage Storage Outlet P nd NWL HWL Volume Volume Pipe • HP-9 a 879.0 a 884.0 = 4.27 AF = 3.50 AF = 18' RCP The 18'pond outlet pipe has a flat slope with 2.4 feet of fall in approximately 960 feet. Therefore,the pond • will help to reduce the flow out of this drainage system to a maximum of 5 cfs during a 100 year storm. The construction of Pond HP-9 will allow the 20 acre area to develop without adversely impacting the existing storm sewer system in Trapp Road and Eagandale Boulevard. The construction of the pond by Opus and Northwestern Mutual Life will also satisfy the water quality ponding requirements of this 20 acre area. Sincerely, W 904%. John Wingard Development/Design Engineer cc Tom Colbert, Director of Public Works Michael Foertsch, Assistant City Engineer Rich Brasch, Water Resource Coordinator Bob Steinhoff, Opus enNMth&Ot • • • • • . 3 NI V 5 19 U U a•• CV N Z tU , Z..,. r.. I t0 to V r N V N * '� v ��'d "" '. 4.67 AC a ": Z' 1 i`l•:,;• N32 ♦n 'a:IJJ i� t , 1 !Z 10 -?'"�• sQ •0c ► 226 ?I,, Tq >>j ,0, - . . •9AA P m • '1 ..f't._•4 ,•1: 1,`.i:•::•�7...:4:i1:w:f'Y.:-�.LI• '.y1 l:'.11:. • '. i" , ° ' :6M c `'4'el 'ENG1nEERING- .;^'`'�'- • ' • ,o�•. 11NISYS . .r:•„, ,,e._ , ,.:..., \\”-r •,i `•:r.+A,,.�.`t::; �•r:}! •°,•;ti;•4.4•:.-:1 i?ti.;,r? "'S,Y,.=1•:{� '?�.fs�•:`'1�:;9 nj.',IY.s :�.•.'•',C„'$,,.,• 'v111,11,0 J,,r , ,IS +• I•�"�.a1i»-'+�n� '�''•.. s,n •.::,,s H:%::(/'��i: ...-.•'; •.v�r'1i.:1. •'%#�v: ,3. x '.';::y,a,v. •A` . v+ :•Fr:,. •-,:•LEXINGTON!` 4;::..,, ;. .' ••'4. + '7.61 AC r. ;• ,:.��' x., ,.,,• r�/]•h , =. •�;'. .�•, COCA 'i N33 .••:,�.�3ti3.>n.s- ` ".J•�`J�t.xw'.'F��iY•n •.%�;�ry.;•,fr. .1� -•;�°l:!,•�'r:'...; -1.,: :�4°<;-,,,, ;;::••.):�; ft r r••• ,...' ••STANDARD:0 I..t.: ., Q{� •EAGANINDIJtiI'RIAI ROA(S vs,n ....;:•,., .•.; /` '.y•• f• -t.•,y :t ;•..• ,,•'r '!•...%;,••7•N; ■ El1-.---1-)z,/".."-----:...' .., ; ..:1 . ..:,.:: '.. 1 • 1. \. fi....:.:../..\ e'71 , • ., ' '.1;: 11. .- .:'.4 4114.7::!.k.(: ".; -ftl. I I 1±-:r.-.I.: r. . 11.S.4 . 14'.."� rte. ,T t •` r ZONING 1 . o - : I-� ;ARKS 474 - I-1 (Limited Industrial) s- . ?$ /,/'A —` c E W . � /o f : t � ° "• .L'1- — _4( K • • I 1 wu ..-� COMPREHENSIVE GUIDE PLAN I - ' 4T° IND IND (Industrial) I!],� • ... . ._ • - I_ IND • 4 s - /....:- • 7 EAGANDALE CENTER INDUSTRIAL PARK #12 3 4 4- r - '1 I ,, 1 I I 1 - t- r 1 si�s1°�Fiill I I. �. 1! ►il��i�! I I-4 i s i -eitil k 1 j ii II , 1t g`11.1sji1i i P —�—t— I i i °;� 1,lisi,i;{1 ; ,11 un� s t i i_ Vii_ 1lifff111f 1 g i. t ¢•! �,i1!s11 "=41 I 1111 !1i t 1 /I !a /.i e ir '.} j l f ., �, lilfihl „ } ;E! i �� ..�#• i} o i t• . a i i ! !t 'nil I �t i I • �., .\I:! If i 441 1'/I I hi, 1 1? ib; II 1 u 1; i' l'•1 1i ; P 1(!i �1- 1111 1„i I ��i 1� ti#s1. . f• 0 1 'i . 1 tl i iii 1 1o� 1II 1 t :: e.tlie '✓ • •• ill # 1 iii;,10,1,1 :ii 1 �� ttl !1i if d ryI .t jy y�[Pst \ �' < , 1 (/ D" i. i �1 ! 11i If �- y 11!!1 1€1 ffl c• 1 V.**,'� Ir56 4S��lk-7111.1 � .'�� I 1 / �' r„.4_1.,,,� ` i ', j� .-`\\� . i11/1 ! ' I 1 t4t -- zt1, I ' ' --rN • '' ! )1\! 1-� 1. ! / �, I, i I 11 4....0.11 '\ _,I4!`r I` JL r 1 % tg-QJ it; !IL ?" ' kcirrrk Ili,- 1 Cm. -- I.Y II.l. , ! Lam!•N`o ! 4&! ' !r.! 1— 1 -) CC 1 U 1 c x A 1 1--,,.4,—_,—'t-- — J I I \tfI Li 17 i . . ! iil 1 U _—_,..7,-,-,a.--..- ,12 - I I 1 1� I 1 _Ili - ,,:_t ' i_--- �1 Ire 2 1-Y 1 -1- i II II 1 11 r II .—'-i-� :g.='i ..4 ,—i�-i i • III y 1 4 a- o I! ' :—>!/1 i ' "� T� _' S I,NI\ ill �, �� it 1 z;/ .mot---_/ 1 iii ` 11 / r . I 1 . y W 1!1a ! L o'- �•-4ii 1 1 I. I' ;�1 ) 1 1 -- iiii ......S..■-•••''''er-- ! t T-. W I e „' ' -'� ! 'Z'. /44P • I - ! J - ' !c11.1-- .-, ,1 1 1 1 / I1 r; 1' 1 Q ' /c w11 `�� !, V�,ti! 1 1 /V'o .1 1 I . ZII — wI • of I 1 j1 r\ i /9g . -\! 1 ! I o' ij Il• Q I a y' \. \� �rn�! ;b \ y II J1 - Q ) w I. 1 f 1 '4.,1 1 1\ ism I .1, I. II1 / ! ! 1 N . J I�� r t / II+ -.i /'` 1 't \ i 1 11'¢11' 1 1 F; 7 u 40.::.4 .t 11ibi /i 1 ! i. !4 V ' it 1 ' 111 r , I ' • i11 1 1 \� \ I �II` 1 ! i�� J ! ! �J-a. ! ! all ! i! I ,yll'' � 1>I >,�y'' ; i�[ 1 ! ♦ I \ 110 : + 1 :t1th li I i:i' !,'\ + 1 /lair i 5♦1 t II! 1 ! II 't i 4 I 11ti►I i ; 1tts�..... 4/ p 1 -11 dl i / !' ' i I---t?.......-V-1 lli 1 11. 11!1:1 ti1� f I i. ... - z! !Ii i ) 1/ 'i ► J, 1 i• 1 t.J 1 ,) ! 1 1 ` I ji'� _ 1 �, 1 I!�, i i h . !t t ♦ \ ` ,s 1 i1i 1 b Iii .! •,•� I11w II I +1 J i �1 ��0/, /ii , ,.1 i•I U . ! r;" . ° i • °° '1111------1:, I xri� I I 1 i y� iv (� I r 1 a w I I I! 1 O �• I ! i i i`- �•—' I a ��f��fJJJJJJ ( i�~--� ; �, '1 '1 Ali s 1' 1�' .' \�.1 rn i M.et.01.o1+ i .. T. .i I I s.. i .., '' i 1 •� ■� J ,J. 1 J ♦/` � V 1 I 1 --- J L . I . , _•• .. . _ S77,,k'-'17 HT .OTA \ .11 k.■_. : : N i ' )-b."------- ---.\--7- 60 - �� �,y ..- n4 Ii-b A4gblf ---1 at:"fp A i ..„,........-0 AST COUNTRY FI C E"P K C \4 . PrIHI1IVIE4V i /� - /` 1 i1 • MU 11111 Hs 12 ACES xi • , �4P"`K A� "j9/) _ 11 X117 L n �r . � - - E N� . '4 88 45, � f 111111 tc . .. ■• TER. /� ,8 �''�� 11 1 1 �q --- INO PAN ��1�1r �� LE N--„1 ∎-• w- 9 W !!_Ar . Q ' NO.� ■ \ - 1{uiii :1:l PAI 85 'Bill,' `! . .>\\ A •-f 11u' • Kr iE F�L I ACRES • I II ' ./ EN ti 9 PANDA ' • E +JHL: .3 _ / J�: h - rii./ ° i e/ LL r ETi6 ��/ 2 - - A. . IB A A �1t •� C 'I rl Jr ITT I' • PROJECT SITE 1 FIGURE No. 17 STORM SEWER LAYOUT LEGEND " MOW ALAI MAP - Iraw amass y.w... STOMA LIFT LIT ITATIMI(.M q) a • MOW LIFT STATION(ry...ip . . o STORM FORCE WNN or •..•♦. - CITY OF MAJOR DIVISION I■11111 _..•• E PWATER LEVEL *00.0 LVERLAMO IRAIIAa1 RONTE ____=— Agenda Information Memo May 15, 1995 Eagan City Council Meeting J. PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION - EAGANDALE CENTER INDUSTRIAL PARK NO. 11 ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: 1. To approve or deny a Preliminary Subdivision (Eagandale Center Industrial Park No. 11) of one lot on 10.06 acres for an office/warehouse located north of Lone Oak Road and east of Lone Oak Circle in the southwest quarter of Section 2 subject to the 16 conditions recommended by the Advisory Planning Commission. FACTS: • NW Mutual Life Insurance Company is requesting approval of this Preliminary Plat for property that is guided Industrial and zoned I-1 (Limited Industrial). • The Advisory Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on this proposed subdivision at its meeting of April 25, 1995 and recommends approval subject to conditions. BACKGROUND/ATTACHMENTS: (2) Advisory Planning iy s ' n minutes age throu Staff report on page throughj7 L gh� � D Page 29 April 25, 1995 ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION EAGANDALE CENTER INDUSTRIAL PARK NO. 11 PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION Chairperson Miller opened the next public hearing of the evening regarding a Preliminary Subdivision (Eagandale Center Industrial Park No. 11) of one lot on 10.6 acres for an office/warehouse located north of Lone Oak Road and east of Lone Oak Circle in the SW1/4 of Section 2. Project Planner Tyree introduced this item. Ms. Tyree highlighted the information in the City staffs planning report dated April 19, 1995. Ms. Tyree highlighted the background and history, the existing conditions and the surrounding uses of the subject property. Ms. Tyree concluded that the proposed preliminary plat meets the City Code standards. Dale Huber, representative of the applicant, had no comment. No persons from the public were present. Member Segal moved, Isberg seconded a motion to recommend approval of a Preliminary Subdivision (Eagandale Center Industrial Park No. 11) of one lot on 10.6 acres for an office/warehouse located north of Lone Oak Road and east of Lone Oak Circle in the SW1/4 of Section 2, subject to the following conditions: Standard Conditions 1. The developer shall comply with these standard conditions of subdivision approval as adopted by Council on February 3, 1993: Al, B 1, B3, B4, Cl, C2, C4, D1, El, Fl, G1, and H1. Tree Preservation 2. To require that a revised Tree Preservation/Tree Mitigation Plan be submitted indicating the species, size, and location of all replacement trees. 3. To require that Tree Protective Measures (i.e. 4 foot polyethylene laminate safety netting be installed at the Drip Line or at the perimeter of the Critical Root Zone, whichever is greater, of the significant trees/woodlands to be preserved. 4. To require that the developer contact the City Forestry Division at least five days prior to the issuance of a grading permit to ensure compliance with the approved Tree Preservation Plan. e3 Page 30 April 25, 1995 ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION 5. A Tree Preservation Plan/Inventory needs to be submitted for the significant woodlands in the SE corner of the property. Mitigation needs to be calculated. Stone Sewer 6. Storm water runoff from the 10.6 acre development shall be directed to proposed Pond EP-9. Utilities 7. The development will be responsible for abandoning any wells or septic systems according to County and City requirements. 8. The developer will be required to construct a manhole over the proposed sewer service lines to provide the City with an inspection and monitoring manhole. Access/Street Design 9. The driveway opening shall be a minimum of 30 feet wide and shall include a concrete apron at the connection to the relocated Lone Oak Circle. Parks Dedication 10. This development shall be subject to a cash parks dedication and a cash trails dedication. Water Quality 11. Construction of Pond EP-9 shall satisfy water quality mitigation requirements for this development. Landscaping 12. A revised landscape plan shall be submitted and approved by staff prior to final plat approval. Parking 13. The cross parking easements shall be submitted to staff for review and approval by the City attorney prior to final plat approval. 14. Continued proper maintenance of the parking lot and all bituminous areas shall be provided. 55.e?'" Page 31 April 25, 1995 ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION Trash/Recycling 15. All trash/recycling shall be located within the building or attached to the building made from the same building material as the principal building with an opaque gate(s). 16. The property shall be platted. All approved in favor. 35..3 PLANNING REPORT CITY OF EAGAN REPORT DATE: April 19, 1995 CASE: 2-PP-3-2-95 • APPLICANT: Northwestern Mutual Life Ins. Co. HEARING DATE: April 25, 1995 PROPERTY OWNER: Same as applicant PREPARED BY: Shannon Tyree REQUEST : Preliminary Subdivision - Eagandale Center Industrial Park No. 11 LOCATION: North of Lone Oak Road and East of Lexington in the SW 1/4 of Section 2 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: IND -Industrial ZONING: I-1 - Limited Industrial SUMMARY OF REQUEST Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance Company is requesting a Preliminary Subdivision of two lots and one outlot on 13.91 acres (606,045 s.f.) located in the northwest quadrant of the intersection of Lone Oak Road and Lone Oak Circle, in the SW 1/4 of Section 2. AUTHORITY FOR REVIEW .City Code Section 13.20 Subd. 6 states that "In the case of platting, the Planning Commission and the Council shall be guided by criteria, including the following, in approving, denying or establishing conditions related thereto:" A. That the proposed subdivision does comply with applicable City Code provisions and the Comprehensive Guide Plan. B. That the design or improvement of the proposed subdivision complies with applicable plans of Dakota County, State of Minnesota, or the Metropolitan Council. C. That the physical characteristics of the site including but not limited to, topography, vegetation,susceptibility to erosion and siltation,susceptibility to flooding,water storage, and retention are such that the site is suitable for the type of development or use contemplated. D. That the site physically is suitable for the proposed density of the development. E. That the design of the subdivision or the proposed improvements is not likely to cause environmental damage. 351 Eagandale Center Industrial Park No. 11 April 25, 1995 Page 2 F. That the design of the subdivision or the type of improvements is not likely to cause health problems. G. That the design of the subdivision or the improvements will not conflict with easements of record or with easements established by judgement of court. H. That completion of the proposed development of the subdivision can be completed in a timely manner so as not to cause an economic burden upon the City for maintenance, • repayment of bonds or similar brden. I. That the subdivision has been properly planned for possible solar energy system use within the subdivision or as it relates to adjacent property. (Refer to City Handbook on Solar Access). J. That the design of public improvements for the subdivision is compatible'and consistent with the platting or approved preliminary plat on adjacent lands. K. That the subdivision is in compliance with those standards set forth in that certain document entitled "City of Eagan Water Quality Management Plan for the Gun Club Lake Watershed Management Organization" which document is properly approved and filed with the office of the City Clerk hereinafter referred to as the "Water Quality Management Plan". Said document and all of the notations, references and other information contained therein shall have the same force and effect as if fully set down herein and is hereby made a part of this Chapter by reference and incorporated herein as fully as if set forth herein at length. It shall be the responsibility of the City Clerk to maintain the Water Quality Management Plan and make the same available to the public. BACKGROUND/HISTORY Most of the land in this industrial area was cleared of vegetation in the recent past and is now being revegetated with softwood deciduous species such as poplar and boxelder. F r several years the City has been working to create a new layout for Lone Oak Circle, in conjunction with the upgrading of Lone Oak Road. This development incorporates the City's layout for the street and the development of the proposed pond on Outlot A. SURROUNDING USES The following existing uses, zoning, and comprehensive guide plan designations surround the subject property: North - Florstar Building, and Martin Trucking; zoned I-l; designated IND. South - Lone Oak Business Center; zoned I-1; designated IND. East - Roadway Express; zoned I-1; designated IND. West - Post Office, U.S. West; zoned I-1; designated IND. • Eagandale Center Industrial Park No. 11 April 25, 1995 Page 3 EVALUATION OF REOUEST Introduction The developer is requesting approval of the Preliminary Plat and site plan review in order to construct two office/warehouse buildings on separate lots. Office/warehouse uses are permitted within the Limited Industrial district. It is the intention of the developer to begin construction of these buildings as soon as final plat approval has been granted. Preliminary Subdivision. Lots. The proposed subdivision includes two lots and one outlot for future development. Lot 1 is 8.917 acres (388,409 s.f.), Lot 2 is 1.698 acres (73,957 s.f.) and Outlot A is 1.45 acres (63,248 s.f.). Outlot A will be used for ponding purposes only. Tree Preservation. A Tree Preservation Plan has been submitted for this development. The associated inventory indicates the presence of 22,500 square feet of significant woodlands and 13 significant trees. The woodlands are comprised of softwood deciduous species, poplar and boxelder. The significant trees are of the same species, poplar and boxelder, with one 36" bur oak (which will be preserved). Most of this new growth is still fairly small in diameter, usually in the four to twelve in diameter range. This particular site has smaller pockets of this type of vegetation on it, as well as scattered smaller diameter trees (less than the four inch diameter classification for significant woodlands). The most significant woodland on site is located in the southeast corner of the property. This woodland will be affected by the construction of Lone Oak Circle Road and pond in Outlot A. Significant woodland in SE corner that will be removed during road/pond construction. It will necessary for the applicant to prepare a revised tree preservation plan showing the following: Mitigation for significant tree/woodland loss in excess of allowable limit calculates to 40 Category A trees or 81 Category B trees or 162 Category C trees. This mitigation for tree loss is in addition to any tree installation for city landscape requirements. Grading/Wetlands - The preliminary grading plan submitted with this application shows that the entire site will be disturbed by the grading required to prepare the site for the building, parking lot, street, and pond construction. The maximum cut shown is 20 feet in the area where Pond EP-9 will be constructed and the maximum fill shown is 13 feet in area where the proposed building will be constructed on Lot 2. The developer intends to use the material that will be excavated from the pond for fill on other areas of the site. The preliminary grading plan has been prepared to try to achieve a balance on the dirt work quantities so there will not be any excess or shortage of material. • 35 . Eagandale Center Industrial Park No. 11 April 25, 1995 Page 4 The elevation of the proposed building on Lot 1 will be approximately 13 feet lower than the elevation of the existing phone company building on the adjacent property to the west. The proposed building on Lot 1 will also be approximately 18 feet higher than the street grade at the intersection of Lone Oak Road and Neil Armstrong Boulevard. Erosion control measures will be required to protect erosion from occurring from this site onto the existing streets. The development will be responsible for abandoning any wells or septic systems according to County and City requirements. Storm Drainage/Water Ouality - The storm water runoff from this site will be conveyed to proposed Pond EP-9 which will be located on Outlot A of this development. Pond EP-9 is a pond shown on the City's Comprehensive Storm Water Management Plan. The City and the developer are negotiating to share in the costs of the construction of Pond EP-9. The ultimate development of Pond EP-9 will receive 46.2 acres of surface water runoff. The drainage area will include the 10.6 acres from this site plus the other industrial developments that are located to the north on Lone Oak Circle. Water resources staff have worked with the Public Works Department and the developer to incorporate adequate wet pond volume in the proposed pond to satisfy water quality treatment requirements for this parcel. Utilities - A 9" sanitary sewer line is located in Lone Oak Circle and Lone Oak Road and the preliminary utility plan shows connecting to this 9" sanitary sewer line in two locations. The developer will be required to construct a manhole over the proposed sewer service lines to provide the City with an inspection and monitoring manhole. The preliminary watermain layout plan shows connecting to the existing 8" water line that is located on the west side of Lone Oak Circle and extending a new 6" line to serve Lot 2 and to provide fire protection to the east half of Lot 1. The utility layout plan also shows connecting to an existing 6" line that is located on the southwest corner of this site and extending the 6" line to the proposed building on Lot 1. The preliminary hydrant layout is adequate and will provide adequate fire protection to the proposed buildings. Easements/Right-of-Way/Permits - The proposed plat will be dedicating 75 feet of half right-of- way along the westerly 270 feet, and 80 feet of half right-of-way along the rest of the property adjacent to Lone Oak Road. These right-of-way widths are adequate to allow for the future upgrading of Lone Oak Road. The developer will need to prepare and record cross easements to allow for the shared drive aisles that will serve Lots 1 and 2. • 357 Eagandale Center Industrial Park No. 11 April 25, 1995 Page 5 Parks and Recreation. This development is located outside any designated neighborhood Park Service Area. There are no park or trail issues; therefore, this plat is subject to a cash parks dedication and cash trails dedication. Site Plan Setbacks/Lot Coverage. All building and parking setbacks have been met. The proposed building coverages meet the City requirements. Building The developer is proposing the construction of a 110,000 s.f. office warehouse building for Lot 1 and a 20,000 s.f. building for Lot 2. The buildings are designed in a way that the office space is located in the front(facing Lone Oak Road) for Lot 1,and facing Lone Oak Circle for Lot 2. The warehouse space and its associated dock doors are facing north For Lot 1 and west on Lot 2. The applicant is proposing the building to be divided into sixteen segments of 40' x 172', 6,880 s.f. All trash and recycling will be located either within the building or in an enclosure attached to the building. Parking Parking for the proposed uses is adequate and meets setback, size and amount requirements. The developer will be utilizing cross parking easements for the two lots. Access/Street Design - The City and the County intend to reconstruct Lone Oak Circle in 1996 when Lone Oak Road will be upgraded in this area. The new location of Lone Oak Circle will connect at the intersection of Lone Oak Road and Neil Armstrong Boulevard. This will allow the Lone Oak Circle connection to have a full median opening. With a fire station and a lot of truck traffic using Lone Oak Circle, the City feels that the street needs to have a full median opening at its connection with Lone Oak Road. The development is proposing two driveway connections to Lone Oak Circle. The driveway opening shall be a minimum of 30 feet wide and shall include a concrete apron at the connection to the relocated Lone Oak Circle. The development is also proposing a driveway connection at the west end of the site that would connect to Lone Oak Road. The City staff supports the driveway connection to Lone Oak Road at the westerly end of this site. When Lone Oak Road is upgraded in 1996, then this westerly driveway connection will be a right-in/right-out only access. .If this development is approved, then the City will request permission from the Dakota County Plat Commission for this westerly driveway connection to Lone Oak Road. Eagandale Center Industrial Park No. 11 April 25, 1995 Page 6 The proposed parking lot will be required to be constructed with concrete curb and gutter around the edges and surfaced with bituminous or concrete pavement in accordance with City Code requirements. Landscaping The landscape plan as submitted is unacceptable. The plan needs to be revised an shown on the grading plan. Also, the planting schedule needs to be revised to include plant material shown on the plan itself. Specifically, Golden Drop Potentillas. Based on the plans submitted, no plant material is shown along the north property line in Lot 1. Plantings will be required along the north property line, in similar design to the rest of the plan. The landscaping shown along the south property line for Lot 1 will need to be revised to show the future, adjusted, right-of way for Lone Oak Road. The current plan show most of the plantings outside of the minimum landscaped area, into the area which will be used for County right-of way once the upgrading of Lone Oak Road is initiated in 1996. Therefore, the plans should be revised to show the landscaping within the 20' setback area. The plant material proposed along Lone Oak Road will be reviewed for its salt tolerance. The area along the southwestern portion of Lot 1 is relatively flat. It is staffs recommendation to tie an undulating 2' to 3'berm into the landscaping from the eastern portion of Lot 1, abutting Lone Oak Road. This will be helpful in providing some screening of the parking lot, when coupled with the plant materials. In addition it will provide some interest to the site whose only feature will be a very long and continuous building. Compatibility with surrounding area The uses in the general vicinity are a mixture of office and warehouse, as well as trucking and freight terminals. The proposed office/warehouse will be compatible with the existing land uses. SUMMARY/CONCLUSION The proposed Preliminary Plat meets the findings as set forth in Section 13.20, Subd. 6, as outlined on pages 1 and 2 of this report. A few minor modifications to the site plan,the landscape plan and the tree preservation plan are necessary for to be acceptable;these modifications can be handled between preliminary and final approval. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED To recommend approval/denial of the requested preliminary subdivision. If approval of the subdivision is recommended it shall be subject to the following conditions: Standard Conditions 1. The developer shall comply with these standard conditions of subdivision approval as adopted by Council on February 3, 1993: Eagandale Center Industrial Park No. 11 April 25, 1995 Page 7 Al, B1, B3, B4, C1,C2, C4, D1, El, Fl, GI, and Hl. Tree Preservation 2. To require that a revised Tree Preservationfrree Mitigation Plan be submitted indicating the species, size, and location of all replacement trees. 3. To require that Tree Protective Measures (i.e. 4 foot polyethylene laminate safety netting be installed at the Drip Line or at the perimeter of the Critical Root Zone, whichever is greater, of the significant trees/woodlands to be preserved. 4. To require that the developer contact the City Forestry Division at least five days prior to the issuance of a grading permit to ensure compliance with the approved Tree Preservation Plan. 5. A Tree Preservation Plan/Inventory needs to be submitted for the significant woodlands in the SE corner of the property. Mitigation needs to be calculated. Storm_Sewer 6. Storm water runoff from the 10.6 acre development shall be directed to proposed Pond EP-9. • Utilities 7. The development will be responsible for abandoning any wells or septic systems • according to County and City requirements. 8. The developer will be required to construct a manhole over the proposed sewer service lines to provide the City with an inspection and monitoring manhole. Access/Street Design 9. The driveway opening shall be a minimum of 30 feet wide and shall include a concrete apron at the connection to the relocated Lone Oak Circle. Parks Dedication 10. This development shall be subject to a cash parks dedication and a cash trails dedication. Water Ouality 11. Construction of Pond EP-9 shall satisfy water quality mitigation requirements for this development. Landscaping 12. A revised landscape plan shall be submitted and approved by staff prior to final plat approval. 60 Eagandale Center Industrial Park No. 11 April 25, 1995 Page 8 Parking 13. The cross parking easements shall be submitted to staff for review and approval by the City attorney prior to final plat approval. 14. Continued proper maintenance of the parking lot and all bituminous areas shall be provided. Trash/Recycling — 15. All trash/recycling shall be located within the building or attached to the building made from the same building material as the principal building with an opaque gate(s). a STANDARD CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL A. Financial_Obligations 1. This development shall accept its additional financial obligations as defined in the staff's report in accordance with the final plat dimensions and the rates in effect at the time of final plat approval. • B. Easements and Rights-of-Way 1. This development shall dedicate 10-foot drainage and utility easements centered over all lot lines and, in addition, where necessary to accommodate existing or proposed utilities for drainage ways within the plat. The development shall dedicate easements of sufficient width and location as determined necessary by engineering standards. 2. This development shall dedicate, provide, or financially guarantee the acquisition costs of drainage,ponding, and utility easements in addition to public street rights-of-way as required by the alignment, depth, and storage capacity of all required public utilities and streets located beyond the boundaries of this plat as necessary to service or accommodate this • development. • 3. • This development shall dedicate all public right-of-way and temporary slope easements for ultimate development of adjacent roadways as required by the appropriate jurisdictional agency. • 4. This development shall dedicate adequate drainage and ponding easements • to incorporate the required high water elevation plus three (3) feet as • necessitated by storm water storage volume requirements. C. Plans and Specifications • 1. All public and private streets, drainage systems and utilities necessary to provide service to this development shall be designed and certified by a registered professional engineer in accordance with City adopted codes, engineering standards, guidelines and policies prior to application for final plat approval. 2. A detailed grading, drainage, erosion, and sediment control plan must be prepared in accordance with current City standards prior to final plat approval. 3. This development shall ensure that all dead-end public streets shall have a cul-de-sac constructed in accordance with City engineering standards. 260-- . • 4. A separate detailed landscape plan shall be submitted overlaid on the proposed grading and utility plan. The financial guarantee for such plan shall be included in the Development Contract and shall not be released until one year after the date of City certified compliance. D. Public Improvements .1. If any improvements are to be installed under a City contract, the appropriate project must be approved by Council action prior to final plat approval. E. 22Empi 1. This development shall be responsible for the acquisition of all regulatory agency permits required by the affected agency prior to final plat approval. F. Parks and Trails Dedication { 1. This development shall fulfill its park and trail dedication requirements as recommended by the Advisory Parks, Recreation and Natural Resource Commission and approved by Council action. G. Water Quality Dedication 1. This development shall be responsible for providing a cash dedication, ponding, or a combination thereof in accordance with the criteria identified in the City's Water Quality Management Plan, as recommended by the Advisory Parks, Recreation and Natural Resource Commission and approved by Council action. H. L 1. AU subdivision,zoning and other ordinances affecting this development shall be adhered to, unless specifically granted a variance by Council action. Advisory Planning Commission City Council . Approved: August 25. 1987 _ September 15. 1987 Revised: July 10. 1990 Revised: _ February 2. 1993 I.T505 363 STANDARD.CON FINANCIAL OBLIGATION - Eagandale Center Industrial Park #11 There are pay-off balances of special assessments totaling $524.02 on the parcel for which the conditional use permit is requested. Based upon the study of the financial obligations collected in the past and the use of the property, the following charge is proposed. The charge was computed using the City's current fee schedule and the connection and availability of the City's utility system. Improvement Use Rate Quantity Amount Lateral Benefit Sanitary Sewer C/I $19.20/if 757.06 ff $14,536 Lateral Benefit Water C/I $25.50/if 757.06 ff 19,305 Trunk Storm Sewer S.F. $.076/sq ft 6,831 sq ft 519 Trunk Storm Sewer C/I $.04/sq ft 23,331 sq ft 933. Total $35.293 &>1 • s. LOT 2 BLK 1 • 55 MATERIAL PROCESSING a .• / • • GENERAL . E-Z ELECTRIC .. SULLY ' i EXCEPTION § AIR K • z EXCEPTION i§ AA . U O TRANS X , VILLAUME . ....: • • . BOX & KNOX'. : '' ••. -;..'• • LUMBER : : ,. . ' LUMBER•^ • - .. ... - . ;, �.• SHELARD • .. .•.• • . •. .-.? ... •, , •`` :.CARSON • WAREHOUSE • 2 ..WAREHOUSE ' MARTIN ROADWAY EXF "93 :TRUCKING" . EXCEP. t4x =29. '.Y N44 • 4Z6 AC 7114 AC �' . N49 N42 , 2s1027D i CD, ...'...L....... 1 o AC _ N43 13 12 ,.. _�.. LONE OAK ROAD 2 .eISAC 1 "«� ':'':LONE OAK.• '• . • ; . ....9.W AC A117 3.00 AC f la? ARMSTRONG ' AN Me 2 ..1 BUSINESS:: :'BUSINESS CENTER '"' ''' • - '.:CENTER. ' 8 .PHASE II ••• :' 1 2 107AC oI �.. �. r• • 3 all AC aso :^- , ;: s2eAC"�A9D ,PHAS MASE -"' A91 ,..•. II t . : : ARMSTRONG • -_BUSINESS CENTER ST CLUBVIEW DRIVE EXCEPTION 795 a.�AC 0'NS7 14 PHASE II Q A1: 0 8 1.92 AC Nail 15 r _ �� 1.92 AC N99 16�s . .; ' 192 AC N90 17 . .•� , - I.Z.1AC NbI 1 .: 'MAC N19 19•• --.7:0.,:•-•••,,s,. 1.23 AC N90 4 ( • , • • .:, , •: ir:il 3 .. f.71 A0 NY1 21 •:-....• ...•, i , • .COMPANY;_" : 11 Z ,CORPORATE pow E: •(".ii:r'� .. . . .• SQUARE COMPA .�;' . •s'•• :27 SERVICE - . , . MAIL `:.:.: - 23 22 • • 'tQ EAGANDALE CENTER INDUSTRIAL PARK#1 I • -4014„:"'?. •,..;......:4 a=lr•.a ••,'... zi,',Vo,P,k.. .IA,i 7 i-, ..4;•:;„ r,,,,. AA ZONING - e .- ;..�_::_..^ • . -1 (Limited Industrial) '` % A ?�; ' 'r.=i :`.�;°ter' ' ��;• '. . is�;. i,1° ,• :/,r2 .... .ft<rw._t--,..:.. t - -i`! `. ':' ..:x t 'UNE 4 .:ROAD° P.4:..,.,,,, ,i ' .,..ui• A.;.! E. ii 3t;1.g &'*'',411-i:,,:;:'.-' . ..;':,•'.., • COMPREHENSIVE GUIDE PLAN P ' s% . IND (Industrial) IND V./R. cer tP V APOLLO RO. • 3, '4 EAGANDALE CENTER INDUSTRIAL PARK #11 p i I I I1 1 r VI t'%1 v I L L n i 1 f 1 .. 1 I i • — T._.3 s.._�._- - -.. - - -:.I l' I � ¢ �' ' I leh 1 i fZ.,7 'A '=-..L'• 1 ti 1 --I 35(////h///4, -, ; 1 I I 3. • li ii f itlx i 1 1 . !/ i/� >y�/�� 1.,1--' 7 1i ci � ";14P111111111151 fI// /// I rl'' 1 i .. J! '' NM �� i ;- t//// ry L *..- !' o /t 11 4/ a ti b, / ! I 9O9 '/ //)--/• 1 • �,� �ii i tp tEttlr;otttrtlitiee�.•II�f fif J / �8i� //' /�I >� ---4, : •'b>� t.44.4!rib. , •' '— ,. ,1Y Z *- tit r! i } r• + --.--�� p 111 it o \ �\ i i i ,k \ 1! !_ ! .1 3 J ijii !! ! f i ; IL ! / 1 �i I\J/ I it (FL, --4 ! 1.! Q ill j` ' II !G ! a S •It Z i a\ ! 1 i/ i�i 1 i�-I� \x \�i !\ 1 th Ili ' !;. '. ; stj(= Fj 1 p /I� _3�_ill- , I \ \ - \ i~i 1F 1 •I 1 . 1 tj r ` in f IL I ) W :,, ;i i / i of l!r I l 11 ;11 ;11 el LC, m, U �� / �•� 2 2 2277: 7 2 jW v7 0 1 /. / ( �- ,1 . � r 1 lh!1 z g' ir ea 111 1' si9 r r Ord i tt! W s �i 1 par ! !) ! `�il / !i I s i} r�Si S,j�i't tai i v • I I I I 1 14, 1 11: 11:ii I ir I ' '�f- y i *' ! ! 'r 1 i !lr 1 i 1 f ++ g r i ' ;If ' l+ sit ;! !Wry I 1 it k' i .1.1:-$-' - �/ 1 , o' Øi� �'- ; >! ' 'Jn 1 ,, __-1-- r ! i E i p ���w-.:\\' f 1 ;1 3 i k: r i lit�i=t! r it Ill 1i s - 1 n a rJ Tr ry i I 18 1 ��' r . A • r1 �l. �-- a LP i i Q /i.. .!• i`.,' IS- 1 i��I M _ 1 W 1 ■ { ,i r ���1���1\���n -s • rLF.le `�,_ �, ;` '• 11 �� a I , ' 4 I %'r I I-' )- 8 \� ' • i 1 U ' 3L_I-2.117)t..4__+ ...---....11114 (-eq . • • r 1 Mvl "- 1 1 , r J• -v y �._1_. � x c % i y F. 0 1------"■.„,\\ 7 - ,-------- \,, ,l•-g....-:::..-_-5...=.,;‘,1 1 . .4e.... • ' 1 I :1 ca o a I■ ;9 i/•.~' ,1� 1 11111111 ■ f f .1VW .'o n liF1 , •i II j. Ii I ISI Ilt!`lI1I _..---- •- _- 1 ��� ,`1`'�:�1' +I X11 �� '� ,.... �` ` ``i.i III I4 r I i. .:•,:„,„, _ E --" $! ` .�� iii I •\. C I• �... . La w\ \ Jo 11/ '� . 1111 5•1 101 `\i 1� tt •')'��� `, •- .. ;111 1 ��v 11/ '• 1-. �r� �I i 1 ��► r t 11 ,t . • a I .. �I; NI!•• • • il-7 .ilt \ - : 1 .' ' -- . - 11-- 1 ;' • d. . 1 li ill i \ ' i• \. s. - • -- - . '-, 111 2 —. .`, ; 1f1 \ . •' •_ r - •i\ •'' ^ ,I III ii 7 • ,. 'i •t 1 • ebb : • . . . . bk. 1 i / !■�� i1i i 1 ti J . .. !ir J 1 e ir,I}ifl ;_." irt111[t' eTi.l ,7 �1 iii 1 ii/ J'i` 1 I ,/111111 •I ' • • . - �1 I 1i i ..I , 41 11111 .U , �.��>IC� i 1 i /!r. 1 1 1 ._ • • ., J , x1,111 .r : -t . . .• •. - — 11 ._. :: y • , r.„...v.,,,,,,,•,...__),..9. �� ..qtr—J�11 i7 cl ��. ....1._______ .r;� - >s.>ig. 11111 I y1as ;,x• ° • 52 .. �`„`- i•�{ W` MrIIIII • ,' . . i�i Siip. id 111111 7 • � - ..t seatudreuRONNO . , • . • ill 3101113 )I1O 3NOl !€w,l !S! L W �, ;, 14, JiI \ \\ ° � ID 11 g111111 'rill • IL + FI1A• bill;Jbl ; ; ! N+ hNd �>t t hi 1 MI 1 '41,Ili• • _ t -- . - rq �t C a 1 pI . I i ± __ ! +it _ t `• 11 ar- •P - ' ' I i I . • i i ' b ii:il tli 1 i • i v F .111Fi •• - t I 1 i .r, • • . . 1 E______:,. �a = : q t1 x;11 .� I_. . ..�._ _ , . f I . . ..1.....1.. , am _-_,, .1; , , 1. ....- .: .::,... .: • .. . :. :,... ..: • ts� � �� 1 '•'-'1 I • . .. , —__ �i -- -I _ . • • . • 1 — re.. .': , = '—'I • ' -' '..• • • • : (ii _ +1 ) . I* - . , ; 1 • - —- ' . I L._:: -b t- , i 4 ii 11 I I I li ' . ff , _...... , iL-4--= I t 1II ; MI,- , ,3627 4 • r----- - 1 1 . to IL D $ Q a std la .. ' i • 1 — 11 1I ce i 11 ."A- C IA ` - :) tA. C4 i, I') Z• ' w� — — —00.oft. ,►nos_ , 4 w_v: :.. • i 1 3 1_ . . , _.‹ - II , it,‘ ,ls Ci 039 a Q --• 1t ° o rY `cl_ a W � � C �c rte' a `,gi I� - (;) ! I , _; 1.1...V� ,• ` - 1,..m.:.: f_ J -- ; - (:) cc L'J (! w ICl / III 1 l I tt 1^1.?••Lii :, o , Fill :::.§ .f•' ! 0 14..5 --1 d 0 . $ :1:::::1 :',1 C 4.,1.1 I 1 i I!: if 1 s si 1112 I-1" - it : ( ::::...!!..0.:.0 -) iv ! 1 'it li ; i! i - lu 1 g AVAVAI §::::3:; . "II! ii I 1 1111 ;I I 1! , ill 1 R C) ! ier.6421...1 it'll) 4 i 111. 2s 5 !I 14 ..1 _ I ,i Ili. it 1+L�af� `o+fir,/, �'`t..1 X v ;C It Ii I11 ii i I, !taco` j '� J `t I frI ifl EJ sv... L -6) - 2 k I 77i1Oral %i I �.. �• `,a, Ii i �;�� � xi 5 t4 III! 1 a; 1 1 . It hi 1E ,' 11 • c lb li l • ~`` I • ' • •ter V'dI; ;1 ff I.-Ii cd1i �; I C' ii 1 • ' ' 370 ; • • 1 totl,R P ' - - apt -. •V 8•.J '>'J -N. ��iO • /�� '�I� to 11 ��,"Si 0. 880.- , � 4 ` �.��---lit� ; FP- _ 6a6o N �ti ; i .. _ .egg . N ` — o �� ���� I Z W 890: • • u t, Vii; S 1-6+4- K. T ` IiU. 0, .t s r.ry 15 p� • 'P I K 41P-I• _m ni m PARK`. • ' k ';►oer 838 tfru $$_'9 5 $ u Inum - "ADgg,Q:j161DGE d ,,g).14.'' � 6 t. min ,, 9��� O e F1 RST �l d ,"9,44 O Winn -EX •; a1.' dF ��• .. potu ,1- r r ►:nib! tia•° h Nip 1N;64. C�� E 1I i,IE -.T K R \_..0 Ap8_,1*0.„..,� 0- £ [tW2!Ig 0 iilI , .3. li 11 tigi ,` .\ Iv .• E.,01\051- NDU9 LS.-30 r' '-' -o. ,, ./.. E-n A `ti 'er j E.. .4 DALE "air:. •I L.S. t•` 0o� EPdit+'IS 1 ••� B90:9.s. P T• , l ECO� 7-Are 829'0' N 0,4 4 SER� b.O 1 - I- 64 ,0• 673.6 I I111111112a `1 85 •• ' T I DP-13■ 884 5,��� IJiIJi1OIk.: • e 8•� DP-6 !l�J DP-I I 82 . 866.5 t 864 r \ L! i. •r w i PROJECT SITE - - - � , --- --- _ FIGURE No. 17 • STORM SEWER LAYOUT MAP STOW SOME goalne* 'TORN.Ew s ( _ .--_-- STORM LIFT STATE*(.WYS.S) , - $TOW LIFT STATION Orepar• 0 STORM FORCE MMN .►•.•4,..0...P CITYOF 'wDR m a m a — -- POND NORMAL WATER LEVEL. . . . . . . 900.0 EAGAN POND NON MATER LEVEL • 900.0 OVERLAND WATER ROUTE 31 , _ 13. i ir. ‘ii, \;.. EiSsUe.-,,,,..5-7 -104\‘`: ' .-la I I -.--N ' T v 1 N . 1 ....eiC•L 1 : - <D49.2/69.0 f ') .j. , 1 I +... .03,, .1 sa 1. .t\I LO . 4, s , ,,,,,->r ,1 \• ® i �2 /� 19 Fes,;12 , -',r ©7,, • .47 _ y�.s/61.o n4$. 166 rAR K:� 652/87 + ©' • 24�`K 1' � "�� std .• . i �/ -52.8/7 • N /�`..: li I I:11IIi�I ' I osi 12.. " 2� .49J \' \ 4 L I I, BLUE"RiGGE\\\*a4, . , � P Go E40,► 'AGANDA 6• • R ( • 40 615/ 2 820, c �/.1� 4 le 3EkL_ C 61 . L ,1K.g OA 1 \ 8 "1° 1-1 t!"///:// ?I .rli sd I I III I1 it • II. I " V,3 67.4/86.0 ''''':21.:°.4 �• ► �, f I ► I 16 84. • 20 rat A���P •- 18" � I� "I � �I �6"� � �. 21� 52 53 54 1 AIL i i IL J , if 78.0 930/ 91.0 .376.0 I I -"�� �� r�r��s r af cot 18r /12 1 ITa�.814..-. • -- PROJECT SITE ' • • FIG. NO. 8 . . . WATER DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM ,' CITY OF 1 EAGAN • 37 • g 4A�.H F:11\ \IA-8.8y LLQ .9r ,,� ‘µ ,• , .^~ 'rt111!',,r —•• ,.., 1 1{ le • 880.b 'ter `- \ �;; FP-3- ` 669/0 ... P-�1 ys,��' h.., , '8 6 9 3 • N ;;` w} daze, .,� .i o�'B9Th.-- �O ,�S9tz'!`�F• 1 2 fal sir et ..., •__, . F-)t-,,,, ._ ........iill\Nt 187 P F� 1 • ��, w \ X4 JiP-la, II[Illi�i PaRK•:.D !+9s,83�8iCY-u 589.5 _ iia}iarum �O�` /� ^_�84316!o,E 9 B ' pun Ali 1�� �m4.4 :1 ir!RST\f ` -ii LEx ,•�/RO w� � �;' { -al `� ,' -A f ..24 S.rit2lA -. 1 � a II 0-k �/ 612-/k. ti 64'PANDA 'E- 839:P-13•dP`I p' �� ! Efl "-` = 844.0�+��, :690 2-. 36.0». � 8 0 '! AA. 1 640.a- 1 ..e�8�_ 7\ 1 M -� E�: ^ Ic R a� `0 2mT• 1 BTB.O evi 3� :� .• I 1 EP-14 S! EP=1; P�3:2 C � ,, - ,i _r 835.5 a. 64Tv 882 0 c, .3B, R .4 .41 - - r as ;`'Jt0 `f f9aa'p v oiiitm it l I . xr ok) �y L.S.-30 IP =-4' c. �. (:-n '—3‘3 t E +N 07-41 512 1 I -11P- 6 E L.S.- � ' r)'� i i"1/se SER - I N E�o0. .� ATz 828:a Rio a/ 6.o Ilii:� - 84 O 973:6 a ! T // _ Epl..„ �' 882.0 �1:, 11 = _ D'P-27® 684.5 > 66 EP •. /a 8•S DP- 4 DP-11 ; M 84 856 •.. 866.5 864. , r--,� II ' II I PROJECT SITE • FIGURE No. 17 STORM SEWER LAYOUT LEGEND MAP • STOW MM.DmIsIllia 1 .3° STORM SEWERS NereNsise ..------ S TORM LIFT STATION WIMP l • . STORM urr swam Irommo p S TORM FORCE MI1,N CITY OF ♦ __ MA 1011 DIVISION a_M ram. POND NORMAL WATER LEVEL. . . . . . . 900.0 E A G A N •• ° WATERY"AS • 900.0 -- - - _3 ? . DRMSS ROUTS 4 - _ ' B . 8" - �•, • t�Lr''`� • , /.....- 1� .I :fit L'•..i�;r•-'!U 31'L N 3049.2/69.0 \ %;J �� \',� +• + Br' �\\ ©4 • •,:\ 'P, r'r 54.8/ I C--,-.... , •`\•i' `\; f _ 51.3/f---712` ~ -_\ ` \ ��) tt , �`` �� 19 \\, t, © , • 8 r / :-.:ti. �4d3/I6b0 4 •t` _����i '`.`` :0 57.5/6L0 0 . .� 652/87A 24 1i 1.,�� ' 12" I8 �� ,' r?� 52.8/74 O 5t:8/FI.0 r; .� y . .x620 sb— -iw- -;� FEZ /0-' r 12. r �``' ,r,' ' ,--��- - !! tl i �•\ �.__ ELUE"RICvE 16, :Thi.. - 6-• ' R \\ \2\\' 4's i \ 4.10 _S � "� :TPI L 1N4. n • . . 6IS/82.0 23� a 6" _l.'.. !i.�a1fi0.0i �G,133,1_,1_, R..�46 .I _ �8--f-. j Slc, 6M / /12t .T8r764 i I i: -' 16"; '. _-. i; l + + ®67.4/86.0 •"`I F o ! 12'I , 10 l 1 I` 20£n�+'`"''' .. I8" , I : el 1 I ' X21' 'I 5 12'� �ti�i 12• ----r _52 I 53 5q i C I �'�j i 59. 74.3/ 725/ / KILA! ' ' 78.0 93:0 91.0 ( �y - I6"\., 8 58:6/!76 i I j 4„� J.S. POSTAL �'I i1 ■ �:*"ne529I69.0/ SERVICE • „ ® I 24 ^ , 1 �1 .12I I ./ :.o , I , 4. I i ce/ i 18''• 1 : ;I 1 _ 12 ' 59 8/76.0 1 j ��io� ' HHIJi1 J 1 I I I' i E`'. : , ' C.ELTER i 19•I I8• ,12• \:r% I TR.r.•8T-1.t - j �•� . I• . 65 i M • PROJECT SITE • • • FIG. NO. 8 . . WATER DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM '. CITY OF • , --7/ EAGAN 0 '1 / . --________:- /-