No preview available
 /
     
09/20/1995 - City Council Regular . P S , AGENDA EAGAN CITY COUNCIL - REGULAR MEETING BLACK HAWK MIDDLE SCHOOL*** SEPTEMBER 20, 1995 6:30 P.H. I. ROLL CALL & PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE II. ADOPT AGENDA & APPROVAL OF MINUTES (BLUE) III. VISITORS TO BE HEARD (10 MINUTE TOTAL TIME LIMIT) IV. CONVENTION AND VISITORS BUREAU UPDATE V. DEPARTMENT HEAD BUSINESS (BLUE) VI. CONSENT AGENDA (PINK) f , I A. PERSONNEL ITEMS B. PLUMBERS LICENSES �'C. PROJECT 674, Receive Final Assessment Roll, Order Public Hearing, Villas of f? Violet Lane Streets and Utilities G D. PROJECT 666R, Receive Final Assessment Roll, Order Public Hearing; Waterview Addition Watermain AD E. CONTRACT 95-10, Receive Bids, Award Contract; Woodgate Lane Streets and Utilities. I F. CONTRACT 95-12, Receive Bids, Award Contract; Deerwood Reservoir / G. APPROVE SUBGRANTEE Agreement, 1995 CDBG I. H. FINAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT and FINAL SUBDIVISION, Twin City Federal Bank, for P. Park Center Fifth Addition located on Cliff Lake Road across from Target and north of Cliff Lake Road r. I(I. FOUNDATION PERMIT, Town & Country Homes, located on the north side of Diffley Road and on the west side of Cedar Avenue Freeway .Z 0 J. PROJECT 694, Authorize Feasibility Report, Eagan Promenade Streets and Utilities - . PROJECT 695, Authorize Cooperative Interagency Agreement with Dakota County, Yankee Doodle Corridor Transportation Improvements L. PROJECT 693, Receive Feasibility Report, Order Public Hearing, Cedar Grove 11th and 12th Addition Streetlights .� M. CONTRACT 89-13, Authorize Final Payment, Cliff Road Water Treatment Facility N. EXTENSION/REAPPROVAL of Fiala Addition, Tom Fiala, located on the north side of Deerwood and east side of Pilot Knob Road f0 . CHANGE ORDERS, Police Department/Municipal Center Expansion • •• ( P. APPROVE 1996 Budget, Convention and Visitors Bureau Q. AWARD BID for Plant Material, Municipal Site R. APPROVE Locker Room Addition, Eagan Civic Arena . S. APPROVE CHANGE to Council Meeting Schedule, from November 7 to November 6 T. APPROVAL OF 1996 Annual Landfill Abatement Grant Application . MASSAGE THERAPY Establishment License, The Tropics, 3942 Sibley Memorial Highway i_I V. ACCEPT RESIGNATION, APRNRC •-' W. RECOMMENDATION, Airport Relations Commission, Support of Continued Sound •'S Insulation Funding OR. CONTRACT 92-EE, Acknowledge Completion, Authorize City Maintenance, Lexington Pointe 8th Streets and Utilities `Y. PROJECT 684, Authorize Feasibility Report, Authorize Plans and 51Z. Specifications, Well #18 5 PROJECT 696, Authorize Feasibility Report, Authorize Plans and Specifications, Well #19 OAA. FINAL SUBDIVISION, Gardenwood Ponds, located south of Wescott Road, north ' rB of Northview Park Road and east of Stoney Point Road • B. REFUSE HAULER'S Commercial License, UWS Transfer Inc. 103fC. FINAL SUBDIVISION, Deerwood Townhomes • - I. :00 - PUBLIC HEARINGS (SALMON) F Go A. PROJECT 691, Clemson Drive Streets and Utilities . 1 B. PROJECT 690, Walden Heights Storm Sewer gp,\(f1C. PROJECT 688, Eagandale Corporate Center Addition Streets and Utiliti s Itqf• VACATE SIDEWALK Easements, Outlot D, Park Center Addition • (260E. VACATE PUBLIC SIDEWALK Trail and Utility Easements, Bell Lexington Addition F. VACATE Public Right-of-Way, Cedar Freewa a , onta a Road North of Diffley �/"` Road Y ;., g Y `G. VARIANCE, Robert J. Rol, of 3 feet to the required 10 foot side yard setback �/4 • for Lot 7 Block 2, Brittany Addition located at 1639 Norwood Drive east of ^� Johnny Cake Ridge Road .� (.3 H. MOVING PERMIT and Variance, Eagan Evangelical Covenant Church, to move a barn onto their property from Soderholm Addition, and a variance of 38 feet P from the required 60 foot side yard setback located on Lexington Way, just north of Diffley Road VIII. OLD BUSINESS (ORCHID) 0,0. 1 A. CONTRACT 95-04, Consider Contract Award, Deerwood Townhome Utilities 1 itiPto B. CONTRACT 95-04, Approve Change Order #1 Deerwood Townhome Utilities • 10C. JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT, Runway 4/22 Mediation Survey gIa. NEW BUSINESS (TAN) /1, 1 gip,. EASTER LUTHERAN CHURCH, COMPREHENSIVE GUIDE PLAN AMENDMENT from D-1 Single Family Residential toPF Public Facility, Quasi-Public, and PRELIMINARY PLANNED DEVELOPMENT/CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT, to allow development of a 79,000 square foot church facility on the northwest corner of Cliff Road and Pilot Knob Road ra? I') B. VIDEO UPDATE, FINAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT and CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT, for a a pylon sign on the northwest corner of Cliff Road and Thomas Lake Road C. PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION, GREGORY L. PRUESSE of 3.05 Ligght Industrial acres located on the west side of old Highway 13, north of Diffley Road WAIVER OF SUBDIVISION, George Bohlig, to move a lot line between Lots 2 and .off s 3, Block 1, Blackhawk Hills Addition, south of Birchpond Road on Blackhawk Cove . RECOMMENDATION, Airport Relations Commission, Dakota County Dual Track Airport Planning Process Position ,j. CONSIDERATION OF Restricting On-Street Parking on Town centre Drive (near 1 8 Waterview Apts.), Thomas Center Drive (near Life Time Fitness) , Rahn Road (near Cliff Lake Townhomes), and Thomas Lake Road (adjacent to school) Z. LEGISLATIVE/INTERGOVERNMENTAL AFFAIRS UPDATE (GREY) II. ADMINISTRATIVE AGENDA (GREEN) III. VISITORS TO BE HEARD (for those persons not on agenda) XIII. ADJOURNMENT The City of Eagan is committed to the policy that all persons have equal access to its programs, services, activities facilities and employment without regard to race, color creed religion, national origin, sex, disability, age, arital status, sexual orientation, or status with regard to public assistance. Auxiliary aids for persons with disabilities will be provided upon advance notice of at least 96 hours. If a notice of lass than 96 hours Es received, the City of Eagan will attempt to provide such aid. ***Note change in location. 9 � e ■ I III I T 1 In 1 MEMO TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCILMEMBERS FROM: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES DATE: SEPTEMBER 14, 1995 SUBJECT: AGENDA INFORMATION FOR THE SEPTEMBER 20, 1995 CITY COUNCIL MEETING R•.•:••i',•i'+.�O•'•''•:�•�:•'••:.•:?4•:•n^.is}n•v?•itiiii:J.?::?.:?\.v..vW W'$t:id{.{?•?•:v.vv}:•i:???•:4:.}�:':.:Oi}:J::C:•..n::.:.....v C After approval of the September 20, 1995 City Council agenda and the September 5, 1995 regular City Council meeting minutes, the following items are in order for consideration. • MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE EAGAN, CITY COUNCIL Eagan, Minnesota :ggptember 5, 1995 • A regular meeting of the Eagan City Council was held on Tuesday, September 5, 1995 at Black Hawk Middle School. Present were Mayor gg n eA I O th lfsgef1bers Wachter,Awada,Masin,and Hunter. Also present were City Administrator Tdi Hi 8ges;:C y Development Director Peggy Reichert, Director of Public Works Tom Colbert, ar :City Attorney Jim Sheldon. PENN Administrator Hedges noted there will be an executive session following the meeting. Wachter moved,Awada seconded a motion to approve the agenda. Aye: 5 Nay: 0 1 S OF *40 e v tt Councilmember Awada requeste#:an amefitltnent to page 1, by rewording the correction to the • August 1,1995 regular minutes to read,'Orify treeholeinosquitos breed encephalitis' Hunter moved,Masin seconded a motion to approve the minutes;#45illt.IxfX0e0:•:6.ye::•5 Nay: 0 • a}}} ..... :w} :}...t,}>r}:::.w.i}}w}}:.;.;}'';%:}: > . };:.+.>}}:s,}}}}»}•.N.v.::. • Councilmember Hunter noted an amendment on page 1, regarding the concept of a monument. He stated he feels It was central area wide signature signage, lighting, etc.,that was discussed, rather than a monument. Hunter moved, Wachter seconded a motion to•.approve the minutes as amended. Aye: 5 Nay: 0 • grAitttglintWVOIMAIESA Administrator Hedges explained that glty,;wass'contacted by the owners of Carriage Hills Golf Course about purchasing it for a municipal golf''cours :;he. weer indicated they have had some proposals for residential development. Some preliminary analysis'h& 1 ee done by fiscal and golf course consultants as to whether It would be a good financial investment for the City. Parks and Recreation Director Vraa further explained that it is hoped to have a preliminary report in the next 30 days. •• fi•I'�'>A��CD'#' In regard to Item I, Protect 567R. Efft ss,Addltion.Storm Sewer. Councilmember Wachter asked whether any damages were figured into tt i•¢ : .D&tgz:;v Public Works Colbert Indicated there were no damages. In regard to Item L,JointPowers.Nreemenj*Runway 4/22 Mediation Survey,Administrator Hedges noted that Mayor Egan expressed I ci;ifiOrA.RI:Kilirlhe amount being spent on this survey. Since the proposals will be received next week, hQ ted It be ignued to the next meeting.• In regard to hem U, Refuse Haulers Commercial Licenses, Administrator Hedges indicated he learned today that there may be a conflict with the name of UWS Transfer Inc. He Is requesting that that license be continued to the next meeting. In regard to hem V, Cigarette Liceeiiggm Companies and Sidco Inc. Councilmember Wachter requested that when these Iicen $;are request r#,these companies should be checked for sign violations. • • EAGAN CiTY COUNCIL MINUTES;SEPTEMBER 5,1995 • PAGE 2 In regard to item C, Hunters Ucexrips, Councilmember Hunter indicated he would like to abstain on his license application. • A Personnel Items Item 1. ft was recommended to approve:the appointment of Renee Sorenson as Skating School Director.•• Item 2. ft was recommended to approve:file hiring of a person to be named as Design Engineer.• Item 3. it was recommended to approve the hiring of Neil Anderson, Sam Schooler and Susan Hitchens as Community Service Officers. Item 4. ft was recommended to appi' 1i!e the hiddig of Chad Holton as a seasonal part-time Arena • Supervisor/Resurfacer. Item 5. It was recommended to appro4the recigiffication of the Supervisor of Forestry position from • Range H, non-exempt employee, to Rarfpglii:$xettO:A. 4pioyee::. • Item 6. It was recommended to revise Section 2.2.8 of the Personnel Policy to include son or daughter-in- - law of the employee and spouse in the definition of"Immediate family." B. Plumbers Licenses. It was recommended to approve the plumbers licenses for Bredahl Plumbing Inc., Central Plumbing, Lafonci Plumbing Inc., 01-Berg Constructiop, Plumrfte Inc. and Randy L Monson as presented. C. Special Hunting Permits. It was rec9000.0 to'approve special hunting permits for Shawn Hunter, Norman E.Svien,Gregory J.Arens,Brian: t Ilins and SteMen Louis Huettle as presented. (Councilmember Hunter abstained from the vote on his licens0::::: D. Resolution Changing Council Meeting Date. It was' eeoiended to approve the resolution changing the date of the City Council meeting from September 19 to'September 20, 1995. • E. Appointment. Gun Club Watershed Management Organization. It was recommended to appoint Scott Merkley as a citizen representative on the Gun Club Watershed Management Organization, for a term to commence immediately, and expire June 1, 1998. • F. Change Orders. Police Department/WI • er sansion. It was recommended to approve change orders as presented. G. Authorize Bumsville/Eagan Cable Cbmmunications Commission Standstill Agreement Cable Franchise Renewal Process. It was recommei*I tg•eOthprize the Bumsville/Eagan Cable Communications Commission to enter into a standstill agr em nt gird Mardi : ible for the cable franchise renewal process. H. Project 692. Sibley Hwy. Streets and Sanitary Sewer. It was recommended to receive the feasibility report for Project 692 and schedule a public hearing to be held on October 2, 1995. I. Project 567R. Effress Addition Storm Sewer. lt.was•tacommended to approve a Stipulation of Settlement • for easement acquisition for Project 567R,•; {ipjt42e:the Mayor and City Clerk to execute all related • documents. J. Project 675R. Red Oaks Addition. Itwas recommended•ffi':receive the final assessment roll for Project 675R, and order a public hearing to be:laid on October 2, 1 t95. • • EAGAN CITY COUNCIL MINUTES;SEPTEMBER 5,1995 • PAGE 3 K Contract 95-13. North Ridge Drive. ft:was recommended to approve the plans and specifications for Contract 95-13 and authorize the advertigeshent for a bid opening to be held at 10:30.a.m. Wednesday, •• September 27, 1995. "' L Approve Joint Powers Agreement.:#iii y4' :A jfin Survey. This hem was continued to September 20, 1995. • M. Approve resolution to Issue and sett::6eneral Obligation Improvement Bonds. Series 1995A: General Obligation Equipment Certificates of Indebtedness. Series 1995B: and General Obligation Improvement Refunding Bonds. Series 1995C. It was recommended to approve the resolution as submitted. N. Final Subdivision.Centex Vermillion.it.Was recommended to approve the final subdivision,located east of Highway 13 and south of Robin Lane :::; O. Contract 93-KK Stonebridge Ponds:: It wash iecommended to acknowledge completion of public improvements under Contract 93-KK arid authdiite perpetual City maintenance subject to warranty provisions. • • P. Contract 94-02.Violet Lane and Yankee i ood(e'Road.''If was recommended to authorize the third and final payment for Contract 94-02 to Northdale Construction, Inc., In the amount of$28,883.45 and authorize perpetual City maintenance subject to warranty provisions. • Q. Contract 93-ZZ, Safaris Eagan 2nd Addition. It was recommended to acknowledge completion of public improvements under Contract 93-ZZ and authodze.jet etual City maintenance subject to warranty provisions. R. Contract 93-I. Lexington Pointe 9th Aid{ftrtii.' it was recommended to acknowledge completion of public improvements under Contract 93-I and authors !9:perpetLial:City maintenance subject to warranty provisions. S. Contract 92-I, Weston Hills, it was recommended:a aQ c i ►ledge completion of public improvements under Contract 92-i and authorize perpetual City maintenarice:iiubject to warranty•provisions. T. Contract 94-EE Trails End Addition. It was recommended to acknowledge completion of public Improvements under Contract 94-EE and authorize perpetual city maintenance subject to warranty provisions. U. Refuse Haulers Commercial Licenses,;: iT ans td Waste Control Systems. St. Paul. It was recommended to approve the commerdioi::hauiers;3ioa(is for Waste Control Systems, subject to submittal of a certificate of insurance showing o ge exti led through September 1, 1996. (The refuse haulers commercial license for UWS Transfer IRp.;was continued to September 20, 1995.) V. Cigarette Licenses.Applebaum Con a rrJ0*Olg:Tbf3: ior.3900 Beau D'Rue Drive:and Sidco. Inca Big Top Liquor. 1282 Town Centre Driver•ft:vuit'slecfl1rlirietided. o approve cigarette licenses for Applebaum Companies and Sidco, Inc., doing business as Big Top Uquor Stores. W. Holz Farm Structural Analysis. it was recommended to authorize staff to seek professional consultant . services to perform a building/structural analysi ,af t olz Farm buildings. • X. Contract 94-03. Blackhawk and BIue,,0t ss:'Ffoad ':EIt? $,recommended to approve the 10th and final • payment for Contract 94-03 In the arntAgof $21,159.830::McNamara Contracting, Inc., and authorize acceptance for perpetual City maintenance subject to warrair provisions. • n EAGAN CITY COUNCIL MINUTES;SEPTEMBER 5,1995 PAGE 4 • Y. Contract 94-M. Stonebrldge Ponds 266:i ddition. It was recommended to acknowledge completion of public improvements under Contract 94-A hd authorize perpetual City maintenance subject to warranty provisions. Z. Contract 93-E. Weston Hills 2nd Addit#i3tit:ii vir letti tided to acknowledge completion of public Improvements under Contract 93-E and atsthcrize perpetual City maintenance subject to warranty provisions. Hunter moved, Masiri seconded`g'motion to approve the consent agenda. Aye: 5 Nay: 0 COVENTRY.•AASS 5TH ADDITION VACATION After a brief Introduction by Mri 1i istrator tiges, Director of Public Works Colbert gave a staff report. Mayor Egan then opened the pti(;lic hear*to anyone wishing to speak. There being no one wishing to speak,Mayor Egan turned the itfiii;'cussion:6eck to the Council. Wachter moved,Hunter seconded a motion to close the public hearing anctigpprw;tp.' a:y e.pn.tf.a public road and drainage easement as described subject to the concurrent recor'illiig:rs#:r ce0141t cements within the proposed Coventry Pass 5th Addition within Inver Grove Heights. Aye: 5 Nay: 0 OAKPOINTE OF EAGAN, COMPREHENSIVE GUIDE PLAN AMENDMENT, PREUMINARY PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AMENDMENT;,AND. PREUMINARY SUBDIVISION • Awada moved,Wachter seconded i4:m tii i 10'app ove the Comprehensive.Guide Plan Amendment changing the Comprehensive,Guide Plai :froiii.Limked Bifsiness to D-II Mixed Residential (0-6 u/ac). Aye: 5 Nay: 0 • Awada moved, Hunter seconded a motion to'8ip fOl .41 Preliminary Planned Development for 35 Zero lot line single family homes, subject to the following co'Iti6jifions: . 1. Execution of the Planned Development Agreement. 2. The term of the Preliminary Planned Development Amendment shall be five years. 3. Final Development Plans st ::#e::sibmjtIikh will include the final plat; final grading, • drainage and erosion control,Vnal sig,t 'c'e'and'final landscaping. 4. Two subdivision monumenV.'Btgns located In the northeast and southwest corners of the entire site (per Landscape Plan).:: 5. The signs shall be subject to'a one-time.$2:50fStjuare foot sign fee at the time of sign permit application. 6. The developer shall be responsible for preparing and recording with the subdivision,appropriate documents establishing a Homeowner :.,. .ociation. The documents must be submitted and • approved by the City Attomey' ;Oftlg*?pd ttbiinal subdMsion approval. Transfers of common areas to the Homeowner's AM,spation shil4i2;:tecorded with the subdivision. • 7. No individual property fenqes,shall be erected of Constructed. • EAGAN CITY COUNCIL MINUTES;SEPTEMBER 5,1995 PAGE 5 8. The common areas shown as;ttlots will be deeded over to the Homeowner's Association shall be recorded with the subdivi0h. 9. All buildings shall be at least•flirt;lee4:aps74::::::: :::::::::::::: Aye: 5 Nay: 0 .......... .... • Awada moved, Hunter seconded: :motion to approve a Preliminary Subdivision for OakPointe of Eagan, subject to the following conditions: 1. The developer shall comply with standard conditions of plat approval Al, B1, B2, B4, Cl, C2, C3, D1, El, Fl,G1 and H1 as adopted by Council on February 3, 1993. (C3,will be revised to read private streets instead i ..Dubuc sheets.) 2. The subdivision for OakPointe:of Eagah 1}e platted. 3. Lots 1, 13, 21 and 35 shall he;I0beled•.as,.;Q44ts,.Ql1 the final.plat. • 4. The following notation should iie'mada'tC'tfie iii f 'The outlots denoted shall be common area. 5. An Individual lot tree preservation plan will be required for Lots 3, 5, 7, 15.39 (excluding Lots 13 and 35, which are streets). 6. Tree protective measures (i.e. 4 foot polyethylef2minate safety netting) shall be installed at the drip line or at the perimeter of the;crft l.;roptt2one,whichever is greater, of the significant trees/woodlands to be preservettr 7. The developer shall contact the;•City:FQrestry Division at least five days prior to the Issuance of a grading permit to ensure compfiat9i :WIthj:the approvedTree Preservation Plan. • 8. The subdivision shall be subject to a cash water gtjality dedication. • 9. The Developer shall abandon the existing sanitary sewer stub from Plaza Drive. 10. The Developer shall submit a concept grading plan depicting the possible grading of each lot In the development. 11. The development is subject xq a cash.:i* det'litattion based on single family rates. L�• 12. The development is subjeGt.4o a cash iriils dedication. Aye: 5 Nay: 0 REQUEST TO RECONSIDER PRELIMINARY PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AND PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION CONDITIONS-SODERHOLM ADDITION Administrator Hedges reviewed the results.of the meeting with the county relative to access onto Diffley Road, noting that the county turned,:tb i $:Alown again. Councilmember Wachter stated he doesn't understand why the county won'f: cJa'this: g 't setting a precedent. He Is disappointed in this decision. Mayor Egan concurred.: sinciimember alitiAla Indicated she is not comfortable with the design without condition 13 relative to a'cce'ss. Councilmeni ie'i Mash concurred. Considerable discussion followed concerning the 'traffic flow*thin the developei ;it and the county's policy on variances. Community Development Director ReIChci .iodlpatad;sha: i:Continue to work with the developer on the • • • EAGAN CITY COUNCIL MINUTES;SEPTEMBER 5, 1995 PAGE 6 layout of this proposal and the traffic flag;:;Further discussion followed concerning improvements to the layout and traffic flow. Mayor Egan stai0. he is not comfortable trying to redesign this. Community Development Director Reichert noted that'this is preliminary approval,and she would be happy to meet with the developers and look at this further to;fee.#:fh, : rtry;dismal rearrangements that would rationalize the traffic flow. Councilmember Hunter emphasl2eti that the reason the Council is so concerned with a private development is because when the traffic iOw doesn't work, people blame the city for allowing It. Hunter moved,Awada seconded a motion to remove condition 13 of the Preliminary Subdivision. Councilmember Awada suggested a friendly amendment to provide for a condition that the internal circulation pattern needs to be modified to meet staff approval before final approval is given. Hunter concurred with the friendly • amendment.. Aye: 5 Nay: 0 Hunter moved, Awada second44:motlon:#dchange condition 3 of the Preliminary Subdivision to read that "the 10,800 square foot retail enter sh #f:be developed concurrently with the Holiday Station store.' Aye: 5 Nay: 0 Discussion followed on the regiJ st i ada::tbA cp wt tyc Councilmember Masin suggested that a letter be written to the county suggesting ti at ffteji need'to b i'iiore flexible and examine certain Issues on . • a case by case basis. Mayor Egan concurred. He feels the county board is somewhat distanced from their constituency. Administrator Hedges noted that both of the commissioners representing Eagan approached him after the board meeting suggesting it might be appropriate to meet to discuss transportation design. Mayor Egan stated he feels that would be a good Idea. CONTRA4 '.:95-12,'DEERWOOD RESERVOIR Director of Public Works Colbert gave a$tatf re port,.indicating he wanted to see whether the city had an Interest In going beyond Its current policy'atioktiliOft the name of the city on the reservoir or whether they would like to also put the logo on the reservoir;even Its high visibility to 35E. If the Council Is interested, he can do an addendum to the bids and get cost estimates. 'He showed several examples of what could be put on the reservoir and Councilmembers gave their preference as the example with the logo and the name'Eagan'. Wachter moved, Awada seconded a motion to authorize an addendum to the bid solicitation for Contract 95-12 to request bid quotations for the installation of a City logo. Aye: 5 Nay: 0 CERTIFICATION OF PROPOSED 19 1102..M.P.guriTOkEVY AND PROPOSED 1996 BUDGET Administrator Hedges gave a sQ::report,.4iliv this budget has no Increase in tax capacity rate. Hunter moved,Wachter seconded a motion to authadze the certification of the proposed 1996 property tax levy. Aye: 5 Nay: 0 Wachter moved,Awada seconefe a ifiti iiriiie the preliminary 1996 general fund budget. Aye: 5 Nay: 0 . Awada moved, Hunter seconded a motion to set the Initial Truth in Taxation hearing for December 5, 1995, and the continuation hearing for Decenibel13, 1995. Aye: 5 Nay: 0 CONDITIONAL USE..0 IT,'AilAXAA UTDOOR ADVERTISING • Community Development Director'Reichert gave a staff:report,noting that this is a replacement sign for a sign that was approved but never a idristructed at Difflefilind 35E. They are proposing to build a one face sign and are asking to bank one s*;and 4he..p4 ;20;,62 ; She noted that the Council will also need • • EAGAN CITY COUNCIL MINUTES;SEPTEMBER 5,1995 • PAGE 7 to revise the list of permanent signs to bring it up to date. Counciimember Wachter indicated he would like to see no more signs on 35E. He asked ether there was any input from Opus. Community Development Director Reichert noted that the adjacent property owners were notified and she hasn't heard anything. Counclimember Wachter indicated he we.figkiEi tti<$( i ( ttt#ion on liquor,tobacco and gambling ads. Bob Graiziger, 1640 Blackhawk hilts•Road, representing the applicant, indicated they can abide by that restriction. Their intent is to use the sf for local advertisers. Discussion followed concerning whether this property will ever develop. "• Wachter moved, Hunter seconded a motion to approve a conditional use permit to allow an off- premise sign on Soo Une right-of-way located south of 1-494,west of Highway 55, subject to the following • conditions: 1. The conditional use pemmitrail be rapOrded at Dakota County within 60 days of Council approval with documentation;#irovidec•:ti};the City. 2. Applicant shall submit a detgi10);41Wpiee::114.10r44jpg the sign location, Including setbacks, drawn to scale prior to issuif iiui: :sigi i't'I?IiG::... 3. The sign will be subject to the one-time sign fee of$2.50/square foot. 4. All applicable city codes. 5. There shall be a restriction on advertisement:.v #*r,tobacco and gambling. Aye: 5 Nay: 0 • Wachter moved, Hunter seconder1.04i i ion.to approve an amendment to Table A of the Sign Code (Section 4.20) as attached. Aye: 5 Nay: 0 • .COMPREHENSIVE GUIDE PLAN AMENb ENT, CITY OF EAGAN Community Development Director Reichert gave a staff report, noting that this Is a housekeeping item. Some discussion followed concerning the Planning Commission's recommendation to deny this. John Young, 16275 Hudson Avenue, Lakeville, emphasized that staff needs to be more accommodating to the development community. He has concerns:ect the nonconforming use and the zoning/comp guide mismatch issues. He has some ideas hp:::.0Xiiiiii.r).09.0#'4§1:14 would like to discuss at a future date. • Awada moved, Hunter seconde i a motlorlr:3o'approve a Comprehensive Guide Plan amendment changing the land use designation of app oximatgly; 0 acres from D-I Single Family Residential, 0-3 units per acre to Industrial, for land consistit of.iIng::Olutted lots In Halley's 1st Addition and two adjacent unplatted parcels located east of Higlitiiisiy'.''3;ariil:;0*t':ot4 n Club Road, in the Southeast Quarter of Section 36. Aye: 4 Nay: 0 (Councilrriemtie'r'WacFifliiiitifiiiried.) Some discussion followed concerning the reason for this decision. PREUMINARY PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AND PREUMINARY SUBDIVISION, FitypttlARIK OFFICE CENTER Community Development Directs # IClierf gave S&ff report,noting there are some Issues relating to storm drainage, parking and access.: ey would like to j ride far less parking than is required, but will provide a proof of parking area in the.euent it is needed. �'$he noted this will require an Environmental Assessment Worksheet, and find no n ifor an EIS. They:ill also need an Indirect source permit. She noted that this is an exciting economi it mplopt Mgitipity for the community. Director of Public • EAGAN CITY COUNCIL MINUTES;SEPTEMBER 5,1995 PAGE 8 Works Colbert added that In addition to:tha access off of Yankee Doodle Road, they are also proposing access off of an extension of Kenebec C$t06, north of Blackhawk Road. Chuck Hall, representing Blue. :l a::::S ield;:.expressed a concern over several of the conditions. Discussion followed concen t : :00.04 d in Mr.Gresser's letter and how they have been addressed. Community Development Director Reichert indicated staff will work with them on the storm drainage and tree preservation Issues. [ ussion followed concerning the amount of parking needed and provided under this plan. Mayor Egan stated he is extremely proud to see this type of development. Wachter moved,Awada seconded a motion to approve the RiverPark Office Center Preliminary Planned Development to permit four • new 100,000 square foot office buildings, subject to the following conditions: 1. The RiverPark Office Center.ifi.iikilmlnar04nned Development allows for the construction of four new 100,000 square foot offlke bulldiris 2. The RiverPark Office Center•;P.Ianned:AQvelopment shall expire 15 years from the date of City Council approval. • 3. A Preliminary Planned Development Agreement shall be executed prior to final subdivision • approval. The preliminary site plan, building elevation plan, sign plan and landscape plan are necessary for this agreement. Upon submission of final plans, provided they are in confor- mance with the Preliminary Planned Development, the Final Planned Development of each lot may proceed to the City Council for approved.;:::::::: 4. City completion of the Environmet l'Assess.iient Worksheet is required. 5. MPCA approval of the Indirect.Source Permit is required. • 6. No transfer or sale of any lot shall occuik l i t#:;*hd unless the owner provides the City with evidence of access to a public street and prof rr iedequate parking for the lot(s) to be sold. 7. Development of Lot 6 shall be limited to parking and driveways as shown on the preliminary site plan. 8. The property shall be platted. Aye: 5 Nay: 0 ' Wachter moved, Masin seconded a motion,to approve the RiverPark Office Center Preliminary Subdivision, subject to the following conditions: 1. The applicant shall comply' it#i'atarrd l L^o 1 ie of plat approval Al,B1,B2,53,134,Cl,C2, C3, C4, D1, El, Fl, G1 and H1, as adopted by Council on February 3, 1993. 2. The property shall be platted. 3. Pond CP-7 shall be expanded to;tom i q ;vglume and outflow requirements of its designated - tributary drainage:district in aGccir ficii' :t City Storm Water Management Plan and Water • Quality Plan. 4. The alignment of the propoi water main shall t revised so that the water main along Yankee Doodle Road north of Tertxiisidl;prN.Q,is;sktov,01 of the city right-of-way. • EAGAN CITY COUNCIL MINUTES;SEPTEMBER 5,1995 PAGE 9 5. As part of the first phase of.#.11s development, Yankee Doodle Road shall be upgraded and reconfigured. ••••" 6. As part of the first phase 9f.:..01.§:.:fleveloprneriti...Kennebec Drive shall be extended from Blackhawk Road to serve 7. BCBS shall provide and recotO declaration or covenants providing the availability of adequate parking and access to publiOreets for Lots 1-5. Aye: 5 Nay: 0 • DELOSH ADDITION PREUMINARY SUBDIVISION Community Development Directeichert We a staff report,noting that they have not heard back from the Environmental Quality Board 0:::10 whet* an Environmental Assessment Worksheet will be needed. • Wayne Brekken, the property oiiogioggootio.::gpprovai. He Indicated he agrees with the people who signed the petition that feel 8:2:footitilidi:Viii61:Wedessary for water quality drainage. He feels It can be handled with surface treatment. Director of Public Works Colbert Indicated they are in the process • of preparing a preliminary feasibility report addressing the extent and scope of the required storm sewer. There have been field surveys done, trying to minimize the extent of storm sewer that may be required to minimize any disturbance to the area. There will be neighborhood meetings held prior to the public hearing to discuss the extent of the storm sewer needed. •• Mike Sullivan, 1478 Bridgeview Aveny8014.1**tehe doesn't feel a storm sewer Is necessary according to an engineering report froy.i:1089::•::•k8 also referred to a letter from Severson Wilcox and Sheldon to homeowners affected by theatat.sewer easement stating that there would be no changes or work on the river beyond the northern edgeititiOleller.property. It also stated that the easement is being acquired to preserve the natural drainage througtiiii0.8g*Ald.that a natural flowing stream runoff exists In the area. He questioned some blanks on the Emilitiffrii&I Assessment Worksheet relative to any governing body that would have any jurisdiction over the city regarding any potentialenvironmental damage resulting from storm sewer construction. Director of Public Works Colbert noted that he Is not aware of any governing agency that would have jurisdiction over the city In this matter. He added that the letter he referred to was for Project 543R which was done in 1989. That project was limited to the Heller property, creating a ditch block dam to restrict the flow from upgrading Skyline Road. It was still planned through the Comprehensive Plan to make these impriii8.418nts..0,tp:Alture. Counclimember Hunter added that if through development there is a lot of nekijiiiiifit pjfs(..8,iatiiiif the city, and It requires a storm sewer, It needs to be addressed. There Is an inOlgsed nirglicr storm sewer that wasn't there before. The facts have changed since that letter was writteiri:'Mr.Suliiñ indicated he was under the understanding that what was stated in the letter would stand at43hat walilipart of the reason he agreed to grant the easement. Discussion followed concerning why thejiolognevokiwis9ulpo. City Attorney Sheldon suggested the city obtain a copy of the easement to revieitiiiiitierfg*Wil* under that easement Mr.Sullivan raised other engineering concerns such as the fact that only half of Bridgeview Avenue has been vacated, and questioned who will own, build and maintain the proposed road or driveway that is In the right-of-way and serves two homes. City Attorney Sheldon noted that that Is an existing public half • right-of-way with no street built upon it. Thegymeigpliprpperty adjacent to public right-of-way have a right • to use it. Mr. Sullivan then questioned wigik4ilig:tialp*Amould be required for emergency vehicles to reach the lot with sufficient room for manfiWing. AccokikOp a report from an engineering firm, It Is their opinion that the right-of-way is not wide:et:laugh and slope El8hAments would have to be obtained from him • - and the adjacent property owner. He woon to say that the engineering firm feels that the topography map for the DeLosh plat seems to be inaccutill* They feel they:40 is much deeper than indicated by the map. • • • EAGAN CITY COUNCIL MINUTES;SEPTEMBER 5,1995 PAGE 10 Director of Public Works Colbert Indicated:pat since this is a preliminary plat, that level of detail has not been done. Further discussion followed 000ceming the access Issue. • Myrel Lundsten, 1488 Bridgeview.MawnJoartAfplok-kennedy, 1440 Highview Avenue;Margaret Sullivan, 1478 Bridgeview Avenue; Dev*A.400:4;::Iigtitir:kigeview Avenue; Jodi Anderson, 1472 Bridgeview Avenue;David Lundsten,1485 gr.iddevfeW AViiiiiietinda Remick,2890 Highridge Terrace raised concerns about the loss of trees and wilcity§; safe access to the park;who Is liable if the lot is found to be undevelopable because of the ravine;whiffler the storm sewer will handle the runoff;safety concerns relative to rip-rap;whether Highridge Terrace needs to be a thru street;and who will be assessed for this project. Director of Public Works Colbert reviewed the methods used for controlling storm water runoff. He emphasized that It Is not the city's Intent to destroy the ravine, but preserve It through minimal disturbance with construction. If it doesn't need a pipe to prevent erosion,the city will not put one In. If there Is erosion that needs to be stopped, the city will trig find the best way to do that—with the least Impact to the area, and most economical. The City does witig.ito pres(0 the ravine and would like to work with the adjacent property owners to come up with the be0:*ay to 05:ihat. He explained that the long term development policies and that the Intent of the city is Wiirovide Iritiirconnection between neighborhoods to provide and promote a sense of community between.pekntOr.t.1:*".c............... Considerable discussion the erosion and physical aspects of the property. Councilmember Awada disagreed with the city's policy regarding thru streets connecting neighborhoods. She feels that from a public safety standpoint,there need to be secluded neighborhoods. Discussion followed concerning thru streets versus cul-de-sacs. Councilmember Hunter expressed a concern about;:a0ass to Lot 1. If It is unreasonably costly to provide access, this will be an empty parcel wbere*Viat:will need to be abated. Councilmember Wachter stated that there are other attematiwaS*filfiridIfijihe ravine, such as building a bridge across the ravine for access. He doesn't feel acceSSIEilossiblei-le feels the Council should let staff take a look at the entire situation and see what is b60..for,:ttkerea.Allayor Egan emphasized that the property owner has development rights to this property. This li::.0i*.t:15*.density development The city wants to be as sensitive to this area as possible without infringlit.:**01:Vavelopment rights of the property owner. Councilmember Awada Indicated she would like to see iiiiiiiiiii back with a cul-de-sac If the property owner is In agreement. She feels It will solve some of the traffic problems. 'Director of Public Works Colbert indicated he can work with the developer on that if the Council wishes. Councilmember Wachter stated he would like to see a cul-de-sac also, but is concerned about safety. Mr. Brekken noted that he brought a proposal with cul-de-sacs before the Planning Commission, and they turned It down. Community Development Director Reichert noted that stsfican work with them between preliminary and final platting to look at alternative ways of providing cul..tril0iii0.§. S110010here is an Issue as to whether there would be assessments with a cul•de-sac. CounarilettibOWOritated he doesn't feel the Council should change its policy on cul-de-sacs. He agrees Wills con*rof interconnecting neighborhoods. Awada moved, Hunter seconcig a motif approve the preliminary subdivision for DeLosh Addition, subject to the following 1. The developer shall comply with standard conditions of plat approval Al, Bl, B2, B3, 64, Cl, C2, C4, D1, El, Pi, G1 and H1, as adopted by Council on February 3, 1993. 2. That the subdMsion be platted. • a Architectural designs and co4016iii7:iiiii0*for new construction within the development will incorporate sound atteratigin standards lent to achieve an interior sound level of 45 dBA. . • • • • EAGAN CITY COUNCIL MINUTES;SEPTEMBER 5,1995 PAGE 11 4.. A notice will be recorded on..eh lot indicating that It Is located within Metropolitan Council Aircraft Noise Zone IV. 5. This development shall be subjeq.to:A: ast .pa ,csdedication. 6. This development shall be subject to a ca'sFi'tra(Is'ded(catlon. • 7. The development be subject:d:a cash dedication for water quality. 8. Tree protective measures(i.e.4 foot polyethylene laminate safety netting be installed at the drip line or at the perimeter of the critical root zone, whichever is greater, of the significant trees/woodlands to be preserved. 9. The developer contact the C .Forestripivision at least five days prior to the issuance of a grading permit to ensure co ipliance v;!hri the approved Tree Preservation Plan. 10. An Individual Lot Tree Presen tlon;.Pi; n.will.be required for Lot 6, Block 1. 11. The developer shall abandoii'ariji'eitist(rig viietis':orseptic tank systems not proposed to be utilized by the development in accordance with the City and County requirements. 12. The developer will be responsible for Installing and maintaining erosion control measures in accordance with the City's erosion/sediment control standards. 13. Any storm sewer deemed necessary.t0.:satve: s.development and the drainage district must be ordered for installation prigs:ip tr 1:p1et:IS proval. 14. Sanitary sewer to serve Lots 2,.3:4,$,,Block 2 shall be constructed along the south side of Lots 2, 3, 4, Block 2 north of Sibley'Hit}s:: rN;e::: • • 15. The developer will be required to remove the exisdrg concrete curb and gutter to obtain access to Skyline Road. 16. Any driveway, roadway section or utility installed by developer or subsequent property owners on Bridgeview Terrace public right-of-way shall be considered private with the City assuming no responsibility for Its constructjgn.or maintenance. Some discussion followed concerning hav rag s`tefi: x dAts tFre'concept of cul-de-sacs in this development, and it was understood that it will be exp lied, but i iat a binding condition. Aye: 5 Nay: 0 t l llTItE # :f AIH f" aik Win! � '••: �wxtt vf•.>.�•rxad•;vv. a•..t•�t •.a a t �+•:xtitia anti+ac::tb.;,crv.tGxc.•xtii ;a:wra Councilmember Hunter reminded the Council of the opening of the Burnsville Transit Station. Community Development Director Reichert,Indicated they were notified by Inver Grove Heights that there is a proposal for a mini-storage area 4000Ri ?(ai; tain Dodd Park, along with outdoor storage of trucks and other hems. They are looking.fo t city' rti#nents on this They will be drafting a letter to Inver Grove Heights and asked whether tlj.*l:g are any concern the Council wants her to convey in the letter, such as screening, etc. Councilmembef�Wunter stated that fte:and others In that area would not like to see any type of Intense use, including trucks:pr anything that rriglos noise. Mayor Egan questioned whether • • • • • EAGAN CITY COUNCIL MINUTES;SEPTEMBER 5,1995 • PAGE 12 It Is consistent with Inver Grove Heights':i i#mprehenslve Guide. He doesn't feel it Is consistent with the adjacent development In Eagan. Community Development DirectapReichert reviewed the status of the Unisys site. She noted it will be an Item on the next work Session. Councilmember Wachter Indicated a concern about signage at gas stations such as E-Z Stop that has ten signs. He feels there needs to be better enforcement of sign code violations. . Mayor Egan Indicated he receivan invitation from the Met Council to participate in a bus tour of the metropolitan area as well as a pane1:0scussio41 Councilmember Masin revieweil4everal i ifnmittee meetings dealing with the relocation of the airport,and national highway funding. Sfie feels tliff'city should contact our legislators to try to keep local control of highway funding. She encoura igW:pwbliq;to:om to the grand opening of the transit station on Saturday, September 16. She noteciViattiiii:Zotifiolf:iiigicti to take a position on whether the city Is interested in the formation of a coalition for a replacement transit system. She noted that the Met Council • Is again not paying MVTA bills, and is asking them to sign a new contract. Councilmember Hunter gave some suggestions to update the Open Issues list. • Wachter moved, Egan secori a.motion toi':approve the checklist dated September 1, 1995 In the amount of$3,144,488.66. Aye: $:'•Nay:.O At 9:57 pm.,the Council adjourned to an executive.session. DLP Date City Clerk If you need these minutes In an altemal't<Ct6:lorm suu.t as large print,braille,audio tape, etc.,please contact the City of Eagan,3830 Pilot Knob Roa . gate,;,M/ ::b5:122,.(612)681-4600, (TDD phone: (612)454-8535). The City of Eagan is committed to the policy that all perso'�isftave equal access to its programs,services, activities, facilities and employment without regard to race, color, creed, religion, national origin, sex, disability, age, marital status or status with regard to public assistance. • • • • Table "A" 1 Number of Signs Location Square Feet surfaces • 1. Highway 3 1.4 miles:sixth of County Road 32 500 square feet 2 2. Highway 55 -junction.;:kith . Highway 149 500 square feet 2 3. Highway 55 - east of • Lexington 110 square feet 2 • 4. Highway 13 between Cedar and Rahn 500 square feet 2 5. (deleted � 24l9 ) 2 I-494 west of Highway'::):i#90 4446 D S) • 756 square feet 2 (588 s.f.) . 6. Highway 13 - between Cedar and County Road 30 250 square feet 1 • 7. MN 77 north of Highway:l;3: • (on railroad) 756 square feet 2 8. MN 77 between County'jtbsds: 30 and 32 756 square feet 2 9. MN 77 - north of Highway 13 756 square feet .2 10. I-35E - north of Lone Oak 756 square feet 2 11. 1 35E - zouth of Diffl (d c ed. : ;): :: 500 square foot 2 Soo Line right-of-way'. youth cf I-494, west of Highway 35 (adde '.9/5/95) 480 square feet . 1 (20 s.f.) (1) 12. Highway 149 south Yankee Doodle Road 165 square feet 3 13. I-494 - west of Pilot Knob Road 756 square feet 2 14. I-494 -junction of I-35i :: • 756 square feet 2 14 8740-5 square feet 24 • 7,797 .27 NOTE ( ) denotes banked , : .•. •• REVISED 9/95 • • Agenda Information Memo September 20, 1995 Eagan City Council Meeting <SENT .. There are twenty-nine (29) items on the agenda referred to as consent items requiring one (1) motion by the City Council. If the City Council wishes to discuss any of the items in further detail, those items should be removed from the Consent Agenda and placed under Old or New Business unless the discussion required is brief. A. PERSONNEL ITEMS Item 1. Receptionist/Clerical Tech II-- ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: To approve the hiring of Mary Mills as a Receptionist/Clerical Tech II. FACTS: After interviews by Director of Finance VanOverbeke, Administrative Assistant Witt and Assistant to the City Administrator Duffy, it is their unanimous recommendation that Mary Mills be hired as a Receptionist/Clerical Tech II. Item 2. Seasonal Park Maintenance Worker-- ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: To approve the hiring of Velta Jean Martin as a seasonal park maintenance worker . FACTS: After interviews,it is the recommendation of Superintendent of Parks Olson that Velta Jean Martin be hired as a seasonal park maintenance employee. Item 3. Football Officials— ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: To approve contracting with Ken Freeman, Jeff Freeman, Mark Samstad, and Sam Secrist as football officials for the adult football league this fall. • - Agenda Information Memo September 20, 1995 Eagan City Council Meeting FACTS: After interviews, it is the recommendation of Recreation Supervisor Oyanagi that Ken Freeman, Jeff Freeman, Mark Samstad and Sam Secrist be contracted with to provide officiating services for the adult football league. Item 4. Detective/Resignation- ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: To accept the letter of resignation from John Stevenson. FACTS: The City has received a letter of resignation from Detective John Stevenson. Detective Stevenson will be taking a medical retirement from the Public Employees Retirement Association. A copy of Detective Stevenson's letter of resignation is enclosed without page number for the Council. Item 5. Personnel Policy/Revision-- ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: To approve the revision to the City of Eagan Personnel Policy which authorizes the Police Department to perform criminal history background investigations for applicants for City employment. FACTS: It is the recommendation of the Assistant to the City Administrator Duffy that the City's Personnel Policy be revised to include an authorization for the Police Department to do criminal history background investigations on applicants for City employment. ATTACHMENT: Enclosed on page 3!is a copy of the revision to the personnel policy. i1! SECTION SIX EMPLOYMENT PRACTICES AND PROCEDURES 6.7 Criminal History Background. The Police Department is authorized to do a criminal history backaround investigation on applicants for City employment. Before the investigation is undertaken, the applicant must authorize the Police Department in writing to undertake the investigation and to release the information to the Personnel Director. and other City staff as appropriate. Should the City reject the applicant's request for employment due. partially or solely, to the applicant's prior conviction of a crime, subject to the exception set forth in Minnesota Statutes Section 364.09_ the Personnel Director shall notify the applicant in writing of the following: a. The grounds and reasons for the denial; b. The applicable complaint and grievance procedure set forth in Minnesota Statues Section 364.06; c. The earliest date the a. .licant may rea• •1 for employment; and d. That all competent evidence of rehabilitation will be considered upon reapplication. 11 September 1994 Agenda Information Memo September 20, 1995 Eagan City Council Meeting B. PLUMBERS LICENSES ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: To approve the plumbers licenses for Hanson-Kleven Plumbing Co.and Piper Plumbing and Heating Inc., as presented. FACTS: These applications are in order for consideration by the Council at this time. Agenda Information Memo September 20, 1995 C. PROJECT 674.VILLAS OF VIOLET LANE ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: Receive the final assessment roll for Project 674 (Villas of Violet Lane - Streets & Utilities) and schedule a public hearing for October 17, 1995. FACTS: • The installation of streets and utilities within Violet Lane to serve the Villas of Violet Lane subdivision have been completed, all costs tabulated, and the final assessment roll prepared identifying the benefitted properties to finance this project. This roll is being presented to the City Council for their consideration of scheduling a public hearing to formally present and discuss the • final costs associated with this project. • • Agenda Information Memo September 20, 1995 D. PROJECT 666R,WATERVIEW ADDITION ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: Receive the final assessment roll for Project 666R(Waterview Addition-Watermain)and schedule a public hearing to be held on October 17, 1995. FACTS: • The installation of public watermain under the above-referenced project has been completed, all costs tabulated and the final assessment roll prepared identifying the benefitted properties and their financial obligation to finance this public improvement. This roll is being presented to the City Council for their consideration of scheduling a public hearing to formally present and discuss the costs and their allocation associated with this project. • This project provided for a continuation of the watermain along Dodd Road from the previous watermain installation which resulted in a collective assessment appeal. The assessment roll for this project has been prepared in accordance with City assessment policy as the court's action and determination did not extend beyond the previously installed watermain. ATTACHMENTS: • Location map showing alignment of watermain installation, page / . r/ • Location map showing benefitted prope 'es and their assessable frontage, page .d . • Proposed final assessment roll, page. (i(2 0 F.; _....:k.-----/ / i ,. t• Li _ -.., _ r ■■•■•1=1■ , I in I 1 I I/ / t _ , 1 - I I I I I 4-->7 / 1 / \, 0 i .-------. I 1 i ' " - • , ; " 11. ip _ f., • i ,,,, / / , \ , w r Connect to Ex. / , 10 PSk 0 y.—...L.L....4„,......„ Af 1 - Water Main , 1 i e • 0 --, 020-28 p I i \ \ / / 4, cCI k040-27 b 031_27 l 031-27 I i 1 / • /o27 I i 7 f i , i i 0 • I 1 030-28 I I 1 I i I 1 t I i ot,-A -roposetri Er , ., : ,/ i ,) 4, # , v 040-28 IF- ' wow: main t -kc/ 0 fr • linprevements t / s\k' C.) g / - , G, q.isp. # i i 0704-27 ', . 050-28 t . , ' i 1 . I 6,-, 1 i ... ; / , : \ / ,.- - ..... , ...\ i ! ...., / , ! IrCi i „I 01 0-51 4 ,, ,, . ....I.:J._ ...._ Z7UTILY IT_ : ''''-‘-.. 0 / — —)1 %x L 1 -EASEMENT i \ - Al 731-N ......—.. . .... CAROL STREET '''`.7.,, N. // e e V , co Future r Water Main „ .1F Waterview Addition to iv/ 411rs School Rood * I / - 4.w PROPOSED .Y Nj 4, ..- t I 7— jp,// I 1// I SCHOOL ROAD L 1) :! 1 0 150 305 IMEeaMeaM . 0 :ij rl Saar in het / 1 IIIIII .727 1 4 I • - Ea- I I' =NI • r--1 I WATER MAIN EXTENSIONS n Bon str o Rosen IN EAGAN, MINNESOTA FIGURE 3 . 11 Associate Anderltk eg WATERVIEW ADDITION CITY PROJECT No. 666R Engine re A Architect. 49548F07.DWG JUNE 1994 St.Paul*Milwaukee OMM. 49548 ---- I.Z CI Li... • - iMmi Moll■ 7.........■.1 I .i4 '''.%.,..,.---..."...S.,..,, S.%.,,,..‘ \ \ 1 1 ttjjL4j.*j TA 41 IE I I -''S \ • I I ' II , -.- .• • I A'.•.•., e . 1 i 1 1 \C I • 1 e__,_ \ I 114 i A1 i 1 i 1 0,Al l 0,4 1 j I \ IIII j / I 1 - II\ ' i i 1 '''111 [ I 1 1 i 1 . y • 1 i t i rt--•* .--\ ; i I s'``,,,. 1 • 1 41111, i i - i •—' t , -1' 1 4 • ! i i 1 I i I i .%'t`•••-'K'.-^r' ' i I • a I IZ I 1 1 .., 1 • I I 1 \ L • , • V',* \I ----1---1-----1_ A , i 06\ sr 020-28 pli ci4(3-271 031-27 . i t I N 1 f 43. 1 • 'i N4 l' '''''.- N ! -I e 507-27 ! i Ncs ii........"..c7N:\::. I;, ! ,1.1,0 1. 4 i045, fz zi ett■ 7----' I I 1 t , 1 ki Z ---- ii 1 040-28 .. ../. Ps C;k / - -........--• 'Ii.. ri_lif IS/ So 70-2 1 I. q 1 / IIRMO■ . -.- 010-51 ---z? MIL —7/ _,. _ _ _ _ _ . 7 CAROL ST ' i q'leFilMPOSED 'FA / ADDITION LEGEND IV 435' .. LATERAL BENEFIT ASSESSABLE FOOTAGE 0 200 SCOVe ifi feet WATER MAIN LATERAL BENEFIT ASSESSMENT n Bon stroo I Rosen . IN EAGAN, MINNESOTA •FIGURE 4 • . 'II Assoolat s WATERVIEW ADDMON CM' PROJECT Nom 666R Engineers & Architects St. Paul•Milwaukee • 49548F08.DWG JUNE 1994 OMM. 49548 ir • 1 W OITMMI�rN/MMP1rPRPPPf�I�RRPPKRAI�I RPV W-+W • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • COil_ VD Za n�fMIVOMMMMMMMMMMIMNMNPIIMMMMMIPIIMMMN v v v N 000�NNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN$. �O mu)oU1N�p NIA Y1 IA IA U1 Y1 IA IA IA IA M1 U1 Y1 IA IA IA IA 1f1 IA IA NN vN.-VNV7 U1NNU1N Y1 IA Ul Y'1 V1 U1 is;11,, U1 1A IA 0.H IA tN K W pP1.a0N.-4 onP.NNeyNNCWNNCyryNeyNN11yiyNNNNM O.O4O�•tPNgIONNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN1.■ .*0t0idi o•O�a0a 4a0a0a aa0a0a a4aaDa0a0a0aDaDa0a a IA1Y t O.-W 0 1;W 4 t3 v-NIA Y1 in 6.11 N,IA Y1 Y1 IA v1 U:1A Y1 1A WI WI UN Y1 UN d0 IAN •fNr►tN • • ► • • • • • ► • ► • • ► • N J Sp pp pp O 2op p pp pp O bb pp pp O pp O pp pp pp pp O pp O O pp 0 0 0 0 0� 0 0 0 a0 S O O O d 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a0 0 • 0 • . 0 . 0 . 0 • <a. N 00000000000000000000 000000000 J H Z. i •O Z. al IaI Z • p V • 4012AN4;rea Mt/2 VVVr/PMrtMtV1VV�•Mv�V•M�•O V O W t.. f N^ ct�g !,N000OpO000000000p0000e 1 MA x CD.∎ .-uu NMMMMMMMIMMMMIMMIMMMIMMMM.2 M W 1 t M Z M r O 00000NU1U1U1U1U1NU1 U1N 2U1U1NU1U1 NU1U1U1M J O 00000.0.0�O.0�0.0�0.O.O.000.000.0.O.O.000�O.ppp rt N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 i g O O O O O O O P 0 0 0 C?0 0 0 0 2 FO r PP PP PP PPOO��PPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPOO��PPPP le g ° C fA M M J Y 88888-8888'* �' ' ' 'trVr•f4 I••'t4V..1••fVaO 4 MM • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •N .. 0. Y 000000000PP.N tst•I∎Pt∎t.1∎1∎1.AA1∎1-1►1∎1∎1∎A s= 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 MQ L 1�I J d . y 1 Z 5 • a) r 0 •� •� ss MIfI 1A MMlA4W W W W WWW WWW WWWWW W W W W W • H l-W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W • W W W W W WUJ W W<!!AC t t t!!<!t t! !!!<!< .-sOcotiP.a)^CO^rss�sssssssssssss IA N N N N N N N N O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 VW • 000 00UU0110yI�0p�p000000.0�00..0pp00opppp0op,,0000002 , J y1 �FOOOOSSCG OOOOOOOSSO00000I-NM•t1A P W Z 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0000 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 000 0 00 1 te00o00000,32E22E1EEiiEEI2E611EIi E q • G 00000000000000000000000000000 Agenda Information Memo September 20, 1995 E. CONTRACT 95-10,WOODGATE LANE ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: To receive the bids for Contract 95-10(Woodgate Lane- Streets&Utilities)and award the contract to the lowest responsible bidder. FACTS: • At 10:30 a.m. on Thursday, September 14, formal bids were received for the installation of utilities to service the Mallard Park 4th Addition and the reconstruction of Woodgate Lane. • All bids will be evaluated for compliance with the bid specifications and any errors or irregularities will be addressed at the September 20 Council meeting. ATTACHMENTS: • • Bid tabulation, page '( . • • 0, OW/ city of eagan MALLARD PARK 3RD. ADDITION STORM & STREET RECONSTRUCTION CITY PROJECT#686 CONTRACT#95-10 BID DATE: SEPTEMBER 14, 1995 ' BID TIME: 10:30 A.M. CONTRACTORS TOTAL BASE BID 1. Valley Paving, Inc. $216,040.85 2. Max Steininger, Inc. 229,602.25 3. McNamara Contracting, Inc. 233,199.50 4. Bituminous Roadways, Inc. 241,383.50 5. Master Asphalt, Inc. 245,887.25 LOW BID $216,040.85 Feasibility Report Estimate $268,000.00 % Over(+) Under(-) -19% Engineer's Estimate $250,300.00 % Over(+) Under(-) -14% MallBid.e n Agenda Information Memo September 20, 1995 LJCONTRACT 95-12.DEERWOOD RESERVOIR ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: To receive the bids for Contract 95-12 (Deerwood Reservoir)and award the contract to the lowest responsible bidder. FACTS: • In accordance with the City's 5-Year CIP,approved 1995 Budget, and the Comprehensive Water Supply&Distribution Plan,our community needs to add another 4.0 MG water reservoir to our intermediate pressure zone system. • The need for this reservoir and its location on the Francis Franz parcel near 35E and Deerwood Drive have been identified in the City's comprehensive plans since at least 1976. • On August 15, the City Council approved the plans and specifications and authorized the advertisement for competitive bids. At 10:30 a.m. on Tuesday, September 12, formal bids were received. All bidders will be reviewed for compliance with bid specifications and any deviations will be addressed at the September 20 Council meeting. The bid submitted by PDM(Pittsburgh- DesMoines) stated that they would not comply with the specification requirement for a 2-year warranty. ISSUES: • This structure is approximately 90'tall and 92'diameter and with its location being on the highest ground water elevation of the Franz parcel, it will be highly visible to a significant portion of the community. Subsequently, staff will be coordinating a press release with the local newspapers to inform the community of this project which is necessary to maintain adequate operating pressures and emergency standby reserves for our community's water system. ATTACHMENTS: • Bid tabulation,page (3 • • it:71" • —city of eagan 4.0 MILLION GALLON STEEL GROUND STORAGE RESERVOIR CITY PROJECT#678 CONTRACT#95-12 BID DATE: SEPTEMBER 12, 1995 BID TIME: 10:30 A.M. CONTRACTORS TOTAL BASE BID 1. Advance Tank $998,660 2. Brown Minneapolis Tank $1,003,800 3. *Pittsburg/DesMoines Tank ($957,900) Does not meet Bid Specs LOW QUALIFIED BID $998,660 Feasibility Report Estimate $1,265,000 %Over (+) Under (-) -21% Engineer's Estimate $ 1,314,000 %Over (+) Under (-) - -24% Agenda Information Memo September 20, 1995 Eagan City Council Meeting G. SUBGRANTEE AGREEMENT - 199$ CDBG ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: • To authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to sign the Subgrantee Agreement between Dakota County H.R.A. and the City of Eagan for the Dakota County Community Development Block Grant Program for Fiscal Year 1995 project that will be carried out directly by City staff. FACTS: • Under CDBG program regulations,the City must be a grant sub recipient whenever CDBG funds are used to pay direct employee salaries. The City's plan for its Fiscal Year '95 CDBG funds includes an allocation of$5,000 to support public service activities currently . being provided to the residents of the Wescott Square neighborhood. • Because of the length and technical nature of this agreement, it has not been included in the packet, but a copy will be available at the Council meeting if anyone wishes to review it. _" r I I Agenda Information Memo September 20, 1995 Eagan City Council Meeting H. FINAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT & FINAL SUBDIVISION - TWIN CITY FEDERAL BANK - PARK CENTER 5TH ADDITION ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: • To approve the Final Development Agreement for Twin City Federal Bank located on Cliff Lake Road across from Target and north of Cliff Lake Road. • To approve the Final Subdivision for Park Center 5th Addition located on Cliff Lake Road across from Target and north of Cliff Lake Road. FACTS: • The Final Planned Development Agreement for Twin City Federal Bank has been reviewed and is in order for final approval by the City Council and signature by the Mayor. • • The Final Subdivision for Park Center 5th Addition which incorporates the lot for Twin City Federal Bank, is also in order for Council approval. Final engineering plans, development contract, and escrow agreements have been provided. BACKGROUND/ATTACHMENTS: (1) Final Subdivision Plat Map, page 14 . • s Ei I'... :3 • o L i. o 7 . .. • '..222 s r a . $Y_3 1 3I=n .§ Ja $ a ac . 1 •.;•20;.' a . r ili ►_. 5 •• c c u o+ :" In ° " � 5.�:1 is 33 ."igi d� 1 3' E3 do I !3 ° •E a i 51 9:I3. i ..I 5 .° �3 I ."21"4c 33..,.35 a 8 a3 2E x.: 'a . i 5 ri a 5. Oi:PCif.::::. 8Y sv•I 8 OS 330.5 6 00 •8 •y YC. i• Cw V S i S. y I S;i.54 11 3 Si 8• ho! o :5v:E:EP21 `5 ' : is : :58I �L -J. e : g °21 �3 •: 2".IYiSC::..3Yn 8 1 S it > Y3.1e� Y \.w. > ' Y 3 Y O a; 8:"S•ISi::t:: 8 S YY ; 8 ! M : 3 1: : Y Lu SE s. ;1?a:1$:;ag = YI a ;.: x s s� a •I a :•5 55 •:2!31-5:8i! :: 1 ;a 5•3b•. .5 S M = "s ° 3. o " 5 SE 441:12 >t° E5 ."•.gY.iuE33�a8Slu 51 S I > : --:'.i YI t £ 3. o € a 8 .•'.'V n 5 n i• z sr• S8: °r:3: 4221 .3 ° 4 • 3 31 Il : u . t i a i r : Z l so so n8.n. : ! y 5 3.51: n • i • EI FY > �..•II °.••iS>O.IY > � 3 i.Y•35 Y� � Y V • !3 Y °11 O 3 i5 31":.5 ;i: 111 =: 31 f 3 PoNg �5 3!3 : I. I 5a ; : • 3 ': i 1.5 0 3 0412 ' ti io 15 8 . 3 1 C2o°g: '�: is 1 55 I.• 3 :a S ' S c n ° — !!as gr + ys ;:,:iBS�� . ac tii .s Aa8 F ° • E I ais ..� a 91 2 a"ici .ni:3i° g h ;C•""=e:a YC 0'1 .► 3 La n5� s> :17.70.44;:1;11 a. 5.3 5» 3t .. 3 "5053"35 . 5• •w•' YC • Y C: ar s5•nsa••jj��1{1{3;:rEs sa =a E .- 5l:s5E Ili € 5g : Q 3' ;S ?;Y]8'Y 1:111'4; 3'° =5 S� I .".3 L:3 0 I as 8 '15 3 l.+ 1� 5■e. >3 3: x e w u Y u�� E1. Z: itai."> r. ..::;i d II g LE°°:3 x S': S 9 LE 2 8 4 52 :11 2: x� t 3�5` s e5 I sI _ •s ., H le :3i 55 C8 •. :88.°. t to !o i 51 ca t 1= \ W -1 Ei.:• \ ' 1435 5 \ 111%.”.43 �J O �v W Z z r- 9 5 kill j,L•t/ \ W �•�a1 \ • 1 5M , w \ A SIM Y 1 Ilk!. 1 I.L. --L�as� 1— .—a.� ..?~—— - • Yl �$ I•- _ -:_'`_`,•vii °e I I I `; 17i3 . NMI! ~ 5 3 MI5 J V `� `: \•t �4 .,�! .aI • . �Al 1 aA .:1.-+s ` r. �j t iii { 1 • rt•�:i' ISM 41 3 I•• ' ' 3w'" x a C I • :1. y- • J ec • I — Agenda Information Memo September 20, 1995 Eagan City Council Meeting I. FOUNDATION PERMIT - TOWN & COUNTRY HOMES ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: • To approve issuance of a foundation permit to Town and Country Homes for two townhouse buildings located on the north side of Diffley Road and on the west side of Cedar Avenue Freeway subject to the following conditions: 1. All final engineering plans related to the Final Subdivision and plat shall be approved by the Engineering Department prior to issuance of the foundation permit. 2. Payment of all associated building permit fees and utility connection fees shall be made prior to issuance of the foundation permit. 3. The foundation permit will authorize construction of footings, foundation, underground plumbing work,and concrete slab only. No wood framing above grade would be allowed with this permit. FACTS: • Allan Block of Town and Country Homes has requested approval of an early start on foundations for two of the townhouse buildings in his proposed development before the Final Subdivision has been approved and recorded. He is anticipating the Final Subdivision will be before the Council at its first meeting in November. • Mr. Block has agreed that all fmal engineering plans associated with the Final Plat will need to be approved by staff prior to issuance of the foundation permit. He recognizes that this may only be a week before Council approval of the Final Plat. Because of the impending winter weather, a one-week jump on construction at that point could still be a significant time savings for him. • The City usually does not grant such foundation permits prior to Final Plat approval except in very unique circumstances as with the construction of a single large building, i.e. a school on a single lot. However, staff is comfortable that as long as final engineering plans have been reviewed and approved establishing grades and lot lines,the slab-on-grade foundations can be initiated prior to formal approval of the Final Plat. This is a deviation from normal practice,but we are trying to accommodate the builder's needs as long as the public interest can be protected at the same time. BACKGROUND/ATTACHMENTS: (1) Letter from Allan Block of Town & Country Homes, pages/e- .9 • 9253799 SEP-14-95 THU 09:43 AN TOWN & COUNTRY FAX NO. 9253799 P. 01 TC N & s i, r ' HOMES September 5, 1995 Minnesota Division Ms.Peggy Reichert City of Eagan Post-it•Fax Note 7671 oats �4,J514° ►a 3830 Knob Road To ,c From / �c . Eagan,MN 55122 coloeat.. k-F 9o—°. -7.11Q-7 ,s Phone+ iJ Pion° RE:Request for Early Start/Eagan Heights Townhomes J Fax if / / 4_3 6 6 Fox e Dear Ms.Reichert: (�J to As a follow up to Friday's conversation,I am hereby formally requesting an early start on foundation construction only of two buildings in the first phase of our Eagan Heights townhome project. See attached map for location. One of the two buildings would be a model situation, as noted. We would anticipate the final plat being recorded within three to four weeks after start of foundations. With early construction starts,there are always concerns about fire protection and emergency services. Please note that there is a paved road (old S.T.H.No. 13)within approximately 75 feet of the model building and Old Sibley Highway is within approximately 125 feet of the other building. We will put forth our best efforts to keep an aggregate base access road to these buildings at all times. Town&Country hereby agrees to hold the City of Eagan and its staff harmless of any claims, should this project not receive final approval. We also agree to hold the City,its staff and its fire department harmless of any claims in the event of a fire or other disaster affecting these buildings. We understand that once the final plat is recorded,but only after this event,may we proceed further with construction of these buildings. It is our understanding that this request will be on the agenda of the City Council for their September 20th meeting. We have made this request,due to the pending change in weather conditions for the winter. As you will recall,our project was delayed because of the retooling of the site plan. Thanks for your consideration. Sincerely, TOWN&COUNTRY HOMES AIlan J.Block President-Minnesota Division AJB/mlw 6800 France Avenue South •Suite 170•Edina,MN 55435 (612)925-3899 MN Builder license#9137 t .I - Ili • 9253799 SEP-14-95 THU 09:43 AM TOWN & COUNTRY FAX NO. 9253799 . P. 02 V K 91 pu el c r� Q t.4 Ilio �t R•., .—� 'fir **r h Vik • rl.s f It Z%. •' �� rl I►1�/� w; 'kJ 0 g Attc... 4,--:;,_* : - oz. . 1,01 ...4 _ : ....,it . nr.::_t . f.-41 .-:. --______ ......., . /il ;...,.,� � w r�r .... : ir ,o,...., , .,,...,_. . • - \ 1,-- ." II if a.morlarV : ividkoli Aritofi-- 0 ,-,,p_ . rtfx3E_4 11,..if,„.. .... -iiiiik,_71.1\ ii gcl.) loair .......,,.. .. ....4„.„,„:„ (..5 44 -..; i., ''..":6?) ,4114:.1-1.7..,....4:)/ n:0„-,)-v44\ , . ,., 1....__ . 4.k..4 tz --. 7*1 O ‘.1,1,0A°°.- -- .1 4,""4-5\..... 4,---l- 4Polo Val ♦ 1 ci ......ow ,i, i, c., V f rirkl g ° : 412joati dt, , via,i; xes./41._ a '' Eft-1 01001011 litz. 10 i _.,............7....„.....„............,„_NNI,;„4-4.41.-:44)..;:l :••:- r? Agenda Information Memo September 20, 1995 L PROJECT 694.EAGAN PROMENADE ADDN ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: Authorize the preparation of a feasibility report by SRF,Inc.,for Project 694 (Eagan Promenade- Streets&Utilities). FACTS: • The City has received a letter from the Opus Corporation requesting the Council to authorize the preparation of a detailed feasibility report for the installation of streets and utilities necessary to serve the proposed Eagan Promenade Addition to be constructed on the north side of Yankee Doodle Road between I-35E and Lexington Avenue. • The City and its consulting engineering firm of Strgar,Roscoe, &Fausch, Inc., (SRF)have been . working dosely with the developer from the early stages of concept design to identify the streets and utilities necessary to service this development. ATTACHMENTS: / • Letter requesting City action,page c2 Opus Corporation OPUS. 800 Opus Center Marling Address 9900 Bren Road East P.O.Box 150 Minnetonka,Minnesota 55343-9600 Minneapolis.Minnesota 55440-0150 612-936-4444 Fax 612-936-4529 August 23, 1995 • Ms. Kristy Marvin City of Eagan Maintenance Facility • 3501 Coachman Point Eagan,MN 55122 Dear Kristy: Opus Corporation requests that the City undertake the necessary Feasibility Studies for the street and utility work associated with our proposed Eagan Promenade project. We would request that this Feasibility Study be authorized at the September 19th City Council meeting when our Preliminary Development Agreement for the project is also considered. Please let me know if you need anything additional. Sincerely, - OPUS CORPORATION 404.6e...44 M.Siele Foster Senior Director Real Estate Development MF/bb • • • Opus Corporation is an affiliate of the Opus group of companies—Architects,Contractors,Developers Chicago.Columbus.Dallas.Denver.Milwaukee,Minneapolis.Orlando.Pensacola.Phoenix.Seattle.Tampa • l • Agenda Information Memo September 20, 1995 K PROJECT 695,YANKEE DOODLE CORRIDOR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENTS ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: To authorize the preparation of a feasibility report by SRF, Inc., for Project 695 (Yankee Doodle Corridor Transportation Improvements) and a cooperative interagency agreement with Dakota County. FACTS: • During the review of the Eagan Promenade development, several significant improvements to the existing central area transportation system have been identified as a result of the increased traffic generated by this development. Many of these improvements involve the Yankee Doodle Road corridor from Lexington Avenue to Washington Drive including the northbound on-ramp from Yankee Doodle Road to 35E and the off-ramp from 35E to Pilot Knob Road. • These improvements have been anticipated in the Central Area Transportation improvement study performed by Strgar, Roscoe, Fausch, Inc., (SRF) in a report dated April, 1994. SRF has continued to refine the scope of these improvements and identify the required involvement by various agencies(County,Metropolitan Council,MnDOT,FHWA). • Due to the schedule of the Eagan Promenade development and the timely coordination of the construction of these central area transportation improvements,the Dakota County 5-Year CIP is unable to handle this program in 1996. Subsequently, the City should be the lead agency in performing these improvements with cost participation provided by other jurisdictional agencies. In order to do this,it is necessary for the Council to authorize SRF to prepare a detailed feasibility report identifying the costs and related financial responsibilities and also authorize City staff to prepare an Interagency Cooperative Participation Agreement with Dakota County providing for the City to be the lead agency. 43) Agenda Information Memo September 20, 1995 L. PROJECT 693, CEDAR GROVE 11TH& 12TH ADDN STREETLIGHTS ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: To receive the feasibility report for Project 693 (Cedar Grove 11th and 12th Addition- Streetlights) and schedule a public hearing to be held on October 2, 1995. FACTS: • In response to a petition submitted by numerous residents of the Cedar Grove 1 ith and 12 Addition,the Council authorized the preparation of a feasibility report for the installation of local residential streetlights. • This feasibility report has now been completed and is being forwarded to the City Council under separate cover for their consideration of scheduling a public hearing to formally present and discuss these proposed improvements with all affected property owners. • An informational neighborhood meeting is tentatively scheduled for September 21, 1995, at 7:00 p.m. • • 33 . . Agenda Information Memo September 20, 1995 M. CONTRACT 89-13.CLIFF ROAD WTR TREATMENT FACILITY ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: To authorize the 21st and final payment for Contract 89-13 (Cliff Road Water Treatment Facility) in the amount of$3,300 plus escrow account balance to Penn-Co Construction,Inc., and accept the project for perpetual City maintenance. FACTS: • The construction of the CliffRoad Water Treatment facility for the final amount of$8,128,586.41 was the largest single expenditure for a public facility. With the complex operational features associated with this facility, there were numerous items requiring corrective action by the contractor and subsequent monitoring to ensure compliance with contract specifications. • All work has now been satisfactorily completed and/or adjustments to the final payment amount have been made. This contract is now in order for final close-out and full adjusted payment by Council authorization. • • 627 V Agenda Information Memo September 20, 1995 Eagan City Council Meeting N. EXTENSION/REAPPROVAL - FIALA ADDITION ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: • To approve an extension/reapproval of the Final Plat of the Fiala Addition for one year, until August 2, 1996, located on the north side of Deerwood and east side of Pilot Knob Road. FACTS: • Tom Fiala is requesting an extension and reapproval of his Preliminary Plat because of unforeseen delays in seeking his Final Plat approval. His letter explains numerous problems in completing his Final Plat. BACKGROUND/ATTACHMENTS: (1) Letter from Tom J. Fiala, page • • • i AUG 2 1 1995 t_ August 21, 1995 City of Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN. 55122 ATT:Mike Ridley RE:Fiala Addition Dear Sirs: • I am writing to formaly request reinstatement of the preliminary plat approval dated August 2, 1994, relating to the parcel of land at the corner of Pilot Knob Rd and Deerwood,to be called The Fiala Addition. Final Plat approval was not obtained by the due date, August 2, 1995,for the following reasons. *In mid May 1995 all paperwork and surveyors drawings were submitted to Dakota county for approval of the final plat. *On June 5, 1995 the Dakota County Plat Commission rejected our request for final plat approval because of new traffic projections on Pilot Knob Road. These new projections showed a need for future expansion of Pilot Knob Road to a 6 lane road sometime in the next 20 years. (see letter dated June 5) Dakota County demanded 40 feet of my land along Pilot Knob Road as additional right of way before they would approve my request for final plat. This would leave only 25 feet of frontage on Deerwood for driveway access. *The result of such an action would remove legal access to my property, as the City of Eagan requires 50 feet of frontage for a conforming driveway. (see highlighted section, • compliments of Mike Ridley) *Many phone and in person discussions followed with Gary Stevenson, of the Dakota County Plat Commission, Mike Ridley and Marilyn Wucherpfennig of the City of Eagan Planning Division, and my attorney Paul Hauge. *On August 7, 1995 I attended the bi-weekly Dakota County Plat Commission meeting in a effort to resolve this problem or obtain a compromise. *On August 21, 1995 I attended the next Dakota County Plat Commission meeting and agreed to a compromise dedication of 10 feet of right of way,which will leave 55.05 feet of frontage on Deerwood for a driveway access. Because of these unforseen delays and the time necessary to correct the problem I respectively request the you reinstatement the preliminary plat approval so that I may again seek a Final Plat Approval from the County. Please call with any questions at 882-1030 or 819-6419. Thank You in advance for your cooperation. Sincerly; Thomas J. Fiala • ae • • Agenda Information Memo September 20, 1995 Eagan City Council Meeting O. CHANGE ORDERS, POLICE DEPARTMENT MUNICIPAL CENTER EXPANSION ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: To approve a change order for the Police Department project in the amount of $1,030.95 and for the Municipal Center expansion in the amount $12,685 as presented. FACTS: The Police Department project continues to close out paperwork on the 29 contracts which were awarded for that building. One of the remaining items covers installation of a support stand or a boiler expansion tank which could not be anchored to a wall or ceiling of the boiler room. • Of the $12,685 for Municipal Center change orders, $8,579 are related to general conditions,the purchase of projection screens which were separately budgeted in the amount indicated and plumbing connections for the irrigation system which was bid separately this fall. ATTACHMENTS: • Staff memorandums on pagethroug� 4=77 np MEMO _city of eagan • • TO: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES FROM: ASSISTANT TO THE CITY ADMINISTRATOR HOHENSTEIN DATE: SEPTEMBER 13, 1995 SUBJECT: POLICE DEPARTMENT CHANGE ORDERS The City is in receipt of two change orders for the Police Department in the net amount of $1,030.95. The changes are described below: 1. Romark Inc. - Change Order #8/pco #116 - Supply and install support stand for boiler expansion tank in mechanical room - $1,093.62. 2. Peterson Electric- Change Order#18/pco#113- Backcharge for damaged ceiling tiles - ($62.67). These items have been reviewed by staff and the consultants and are in order for consideration by the City Council at this time. If any Council member wishes to review the change in more detail, please let me know. gie • �9a to I MEMO __city of eagan TO: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES FROM: ASSISTANT TO THE CITY ADMINISTRATOR HOHENSTEIN DATE: SEPTEMBER 13, 1995 SUBJECT: MUNICIPAL CENTER EXPANSION CHANGE ORDERS The City is in receipt of nine change orders for the municipal center remodeling in the net ' amount of $12,685. The changes are described below: 1. The Builders - Change Order #4/pco #24 - Delete installation of wood blocking at roof and unforeseen demolition - ($1,233.00). 2. DAKA Corp. - Change Order #1/pco #4 - Modifications to north vestibule to accomodate change from stone to brick - $545.00. 3. Pink Companies - Change Order #1/pco #31 - Reduce carpet installation in area where tile is being retained - ($132.00). 4. The Builders - Change Order #5/pco #32 - Removal of floor adhesive and wood blocking (to be charged to general conditions) - $3,573.00. 5. The Builders - Change Order #6/pco #37 - Furnish projection screens as budgeted - $2,234.00. 6. McGuire Mechanical - Change Order #6/pco #38 - Plumbing connections for irrigation system - $2,772.00. 7. Romark - Change Order #1/pco #12 - Modify connections for return air and shaft ductwork due to conditions not shown on original building construction plans and provide natural gas connections included in late addendum - $4,961.00. 8. DAKA Corp. - Change Order #3/pco #26 - Modifications of steel design to accomodate field variations in topping thickness - $265.00. • e9q . • 9. McGuire Mechanical - Change Order #5/pco #34 - Deletion of plumbing modifications for lower level water fountain - ($300.00). These items have been reviewed in detail by the staff and consultants and are in order for consideration by the City Council at this time. If any Council member wishes to review the change in more detail, please let me know. • • • 3 0 Agenda Information Memo September 20, 1995 Eagan City Council Meeting P. APPROVE 1996 BUDGET, CONVENTION AND VISITORS BUREAU ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: To approve 1996 Eagan Convention and Visitors Bureau budget. FACTS: • As a condition of implementing the lodging tax to support the Convention and Visitors Bureau, the City Council has the authority to review and approve the Convention and Visitors Bureau annual budget. • The Convention and Visitors Bureau fiscal year runs from October 1 to September 30 • each year. • The budget as presented is to be reviewed by the Convention and Visitors Bureau board on Monday, September 18, 1995. Any changes or adjustments will be pointed out at the City Council meeting by Ann Carlon. ATTACHMENTS: Eagan Convention& Visitors Bureau 1996 Marketing Plan,pages 32-- thru . Eagan Convention & Visitors Bureau 1996 Budget, pages ,(. thru 3? . Comparison of 1996 and 1996 budgets, pages top thru tI I . Fiscal year 1995 collections from the lodging tax, page y . 3 / . • ece • EAGAN C O N V E N T I O N AND VISITORS $UREAU 1 • 800 • EAGAN • 20 Eagan Convention & Visitors Bureau 1996 MARKETING PLAN Mission Statement: To promote Eagan as a preferred destination and to advance the economic impact of tourism in the Eagan area. . 13 8 0 GOALS: 1.Increase off-season promotion and events-Thanksgiving to April 'Corporate 2.Increase awareness of Eagan 3.Diversify the funding base Center Curve 4.Prepare technologically for the future 5.Top 5 Hotel Occupancy market in the nation Suite 116 OBJECTIVES: 1. Fill the down-time from Thanksgiving to April weekends E agan,'M N with leisure&group tour travelers-focus on Canada and top feeder cities 55121 2.Strong Public Relations&Service orientation to promote general awareness of destination Am. Marketing strategies designed to address the#1 objective: Fill the down-time from Thanksgiving to April ANAL alltEe with leisure&group tour travelers-focus on Canada and top feeder cities NATIONAL N.IN A•WgAT10N.MC. MARKETING STRATEGY Timeline Estimated COST Leisure Market 1.Eagan°s 1996 Tourism Brochure Print 35,000 1/1/96 $15,000 2.Eagan Coupon Book Print 20,000 1/1/96 $ 5,000 3.Print Advertising-newspaper coupon ads,travel magazines group tour magazines,meetings publications Twin Cities Visitors Guide 11/2/95 $3,802.50 Phone Japanese Guide 11/1/95 $935.00 Eagan Telephone Book 12/1/95 $152.50 (612)452-9872 Minnesota Meetings&Events Sp/Fa $3,600 • FAX (612)452-8978 �� • . . ece • EAdAN C O N V E N T I O N - AND VISITORS BUREAU 1 • 800 • EAGAN • 20 t. MARKETING STRATEGY Timeline Estimated COST Travel Weekly $1,580 AAA Magazines $9,800 Home&Away Jan/Feb/96 $3,500 Tour Book 1,018,100 circ. 10/6/95 $2,580 Midwest Living Winter/Spring $7,020 Better Homes&Gardens March/Sept/Oct $7,722 Great Lakes Group Tour Magazine $2,220 Midwest Vacation Guide Newspaper Insert April $5,060 Iowa Newspaper Assn.Brochure Pages Ap/Sept $2,790 1380 Destinations-Milwaukee Journal Aug $949 MSP Airport News $285 :Corporate NTA Courier May/Aug/Oct $1,969 Twin Cities Insiders Guide 1/3page Sept. $500 Center Curve Minnesota Explorer Summer/Fall/Winter $250 Kansas City Star Brochure Page Oct/Jan. $600 Suite 116 Eastern Iowa DMA April $362 Twin Cities Reader $50 Eagan, MN Tri-State Newspapers Dec. $146.96pci $4,300 Senior Group Traveler Feb/Aug $1,150 55121 Eagan Ice Arena advertising Winter $1,200 Advertising Agency&Creative-ad production $5,000 • • 4.Mall of America/Northwest Airlines/Park&Fly $10,000 weekend packages-Coupon ads,direct mail rs • �f�• 5.Airport posters at carousels or phone wall $5,000 NATIONAL tOUR ASSOCIATION.INC. SUB-TOTAL $102,377 Group Tour Marketing-direct mail,sales calls to top feeder $5,000 mSAcities,telemarketing,research,gifts NTA Annual Convention 11/2-5/95 $3,500 ABA Annual Convention 12/2-8/95 $2,000 Jack Rabbit Show 2/2-4/96 $1,000 Winnipeg Tour Operators 3/96 . - $1,800 Phone GLAMER Shows •$1,400 FAM tours $500 (612)452-9872 SUB-TOTAL $15,200.00 • FAX (612)452-8978 3 5 • • . . e •• • ••EAGAN C O N V E N T I O N AND VISITORS EUREAU 1 • 800 • EAGAN • 20 Convention Marketing-sales calls,direct mail,telemarketing $1,500 MSAE Expo 5/96 $650 SUB-TOTAL $2,150.00 Corporate Marketing-Sales calls,direct mail,gifts $1,000 Corporate Appreciation Reception/Annual Meeting $3,000 SUB-TOTAL $4,000.00 Events-special promotions,festivals,direct mail,ads $8,000 $5,000 offered as a matching grant to community events 13 8 0 SUB-TOTAL $8,000 Corporate International Marketing-sales calls,direct mail,Sister City $1,000 Destinations`96 2/12-18/96 $2,500 Center Curve TIA International Pow Wow 6/8-12/96 $2,500 SUB-TOTAL $6,000.00 • Suite 116 • Marketing strategies designed to address the #2 objective: Eagan, MN Strong Public Relations&Service orientation to promote general awareness of destination 55121 1. Travel Trade Shows • AC:TA Thunder Bay 10/13-15/95 $1,500 Iowa Winter Fun&Vacation Show 11/3-5/95 $1,400 Des Moines Sport&Travel Show 2/27-3/2/96 $1,800 Active America Travel Summit 6/4-7/96 $1,000 ACTA Showcase-Calgary 9/12-13/96 $2.000 /AgalAtaiN0.` SUB TOTAL $7,700.00 2. Outdoor Billboards $6,000 111"11 ; 3. Telephone answering system to route calls for direct contact $60 4.Postage for direct mail&fulfillment. $10,000 5.Audio/Visual-slide set reproductions,information booklet with • Phone slides for motorcoaches on tour $2,000 I' (612)452-9872 6.Media Kit&Press Releases $1,000 FAX • 3 (7/ . (612)452-8978 . • • , .• • • •EAOAN C 0 N V E N T 1 0 N AND VISITORS BUREAU 1 • 800 • EAGAN • 20 7.Develop City of Eagan "Picture Book"with city entities $2,000 8. Tourist Information Center in downtown Eagan 9.Brochure Racks at gas stations,etc. $250 • 10.Front-line Education of employees in Eagan $1,500 Offer scholarship program to hospitality industry 11.Research-Smith Travel Research compare scats $800 -. 1380 12.Associations-MACVB,MMA,TMA,TCTAA, Corporate NTA,ABA,MSAE,IFA,TIA,Metro Assn. $4,000 IACVB-Annual Meeting 7/20-23/96 $1,500 Center Curve SUB-TOTAL $29,110.00 • Suite 116 OPERATIONS: PERSONNEL: Eagan, MN Rent $13,720 Wages $80,000 Administrative Fee $9,600 Payroll Taxes $5,000 5 5121 Accounting $1,200 Health Insurance $1,345 Depreciation $800 Expenses $3,500 Education $2,000 Pension $2,800 Insurance $2,000 SUB-TOTAL $92,645 Supplies $3,000 Telephone $2,500 EQUIPMENT/MAINTENANCE LE* J SUB-TOTAL $34,820 $1,000 DNATIONAL TOUR ANOCIATION.WO. 1996 TOTAL $303,002.00 .. Comparison to 1.5)95 $278,957.00(est.) 1994 $176,842.69 • MSA Estimated Income for 1996 3%Lodging Tax $282,000 Membership Dues $ 1,500 Advertising/Coupons $ 1,000 Events $ 4,000 Phone MOT Co-op Fund $ 13,875 Investment Income $ 500 (612)452-9872 TOTAL $302,875.00 FAX (612)452-8978 EAGAN Convention & Visitors Bureau 1380 Corporate Center Curve #116 Eagan, MN 55121-1200 (612) 452-9872 1-800-EAGAN-20 1996 BUDGET OPERATIONS Rent $13,720.00 Administrative Fee $9,600.00 Accounting $1,200.00 Depreciation $800.00 Education $2,000.00 Insurance $2,000.00 Supplies $3,000.00 Telephone $2,500.00 TOTAL $34,820.00 EQUIPMENT Computer/Software Maintenance&Repair $1,000.00 TOTAL $1,000.00 PERSONNEL Director Wages $45,000.00 Assistants Wages $35,000.00 Payroll Taxes $5,000.00 Health Ins. $1,345.00 Expenses $3,500.00 Pension $2,800.00 TOTAL $92,645.00 ADVERTISING Eagan Telephone Book $152.50 Twin Cities Tourism Book $3,802.50 Minnesota Meeting&Events $3,600.00 Travel Weekly $1,580.00 AAA Magazines $9,800.00 Midwest Living $7,020.00 Better Homes&Gardens *7,722.00 Great Lakes Group Tour Magazine$2,220.00 Japanese Guide Book - $935.00 - • - Insiders Guide to the Twin Cities $500.00 Minnesota Explorer $250.00 M tro Iowa Plus $2,790.00 Midwest Vacation Guide Insert $5,060.00 3(t, _ _ Selected Newspaper Coupon ads $4,300.00 Kansas City Star Brochure Page $600.00 Tour Book $2,580.00 Home&Away $3,500.00 Destinations-Milwaukee Journal $949.00 MSP Airport News $285.00 NTA Courier $1,969.00 Eastern Iowa DMA $362.00 Twin Cities Reader $50.00 Senior Group Traveler $1,150.00 Eagan Ice Arena Advertising $1,200.00 Advertising Agency&Art $5,000.00 Mall of America/NWA weekend Packages-coupon ads $10,000.00 Airport Posters-baggage carousel$5,000.00 TOTAL $82,377.00 OUTDOOR BILLBOARDS $6,000.00 MEETINGS&CONVENTIONS-TRAVEL TRADE SHOWS ACTA Thunder Bay $1,500.00 Iowa Winter Vacation Show $1,400.00 Des Moines Travel Show $1,800.00 Active America Travel Summit $1,000.00 ACTA Calgary/Edmonton . $2,000.00 TOTAL $7,700.00 ANNUAL MEETING • $1,500.00 TOURISM BROCHURE Art Production&Printing $15,000.00 COUPON BOOK Art Production&Printing $5,000.00 INTERNATIONAL MARKETING • Destinations`96,Sales calls, $6,000.00 direct mail,Sister City Hsu Chin Travel Industry of America-International Pow-Wow GROUP TOUR MARKETING Direct mail,sales calls to top $5,000.00 feeder cities,telemarketing • Jack Rabbit Show $1,000.00 • Glamer Shows $1,400.00 • °57 . • • NTA Annual Convention $3,500.00 FAM Tours&Materials $500.00 ABA Marketplace $2,000.00 Winnipeg Tour Operators $1,800.00 TOTAL $15,200.00 CONVENTION MARKETING sales calls,direct mail, $1,500.00 MSAE Expo Show $650.00 TOTAL . 2,150.00 CORPORATE MARKETING&PROMOTION Sales,calls,direct mail,gifts $1,000.00 Corporate Appreciation Party $1,500.00 TOTAL $2,500.00 MEDIA&EDUCATION Video Tape&Slide Show $2,000.00 Media Kit&Press Releases $1,000.00 Front-line Education $1,500.00 Scholarships TOTAL $4,500.00 SPECIAL EVENTS PROMOTIONAL SUPPORT FUND • $8,000.00 - • POSTAGE-fulfillment $10,000.00 • TELEPHONE direct route calls $60.00 RESEARCH $800.00 BROCHURE RACKS-Gas Stations$250.00 CITY OF EAGAN Economic Development Book $2,000.00 TOURIST INFORMATION CENTER ? Lease space,equipment,operations ASSOCIATIONS MACVB $200.00 Minnesota Motel Association $12.00 IACVB $1,320.00 . . Nat'l.Tour Association $425.00 American Bus Association $395.00 T.C.Tourist Attractions Assn $450.00 Tour Managers Assoc. $100.00 • MN Soci ty of Assn.Executives $175.00 Internt'l Festivals and Events $75.00 Minnesota Executives in Tourism$75.00 Travel Industry of America $725.00 IACVB Annual Meeting $1,500.00 TOTAL $5,500.00 • 1996 1995 1994 TOTAL EXPENSES $303,002.00 $297,460.00 $176,842.69 REVENUE (Estimated 3%tax) $282,000.00 $272,000.00 $176,842.69 (Membership Dues) *1,500.00 12,500.00 $2,027.00 (Ad Sales&Events) $5,000.00 $3,500.00 $3,905.00 (Fund Interest) $500.00 $660.00 MOT Co-op Fund $13,875.00 TOTAL REVENUE $302,875.00 $278,660.00 $182,774.69 OPERATIONS RESERVE FUND: BOND FUND$20,000.00 (1996 Operating Reserve Expense)$10,000.00 • • 1996 Eagan Convention & Visitors Bureau Budget 1995 Proposed 1996 Budget ud et Operations: Rent 8,750.00 13,720.00 • Administrative Fee 8,400.00 • 9,600.00 Accounting 3,000.00 1,200.00 Depreciation 2,000.00 800.00 Postage 5,000.00 10,000.00 Dues/Subscriptions 3,000.00 0.00 Education 2,000.00 2,000.00 Insurance 2,000.00 2,000.00 Supplies 2,000.00 3,000.00 800 Number 2,000.00 2,500.00 Total 38,150.00 44,820.00 • Personnel: Wages & Payroll Taxes 44,500.00 80,000.00 • FICA 4,000.00 5,000.00 Health Insurance 1,100.00 1,345.00 Expenses 2,400.00 3,500.00 Pension 2,000.00 2,800.00 Total 54,000.00 92,645.00 Tourism Marketing: Tourism Brochure 13,500.00 15,000.00 Coupon Book 1,500.00 5,000.00 Total 15,000.00 20,000.00 Advertising: Print Advertising 37,602.50 67,377.00 Radio Advertising 0.00 0.00 Mall of America Promotion 0.00 10,000.00 Airport Posters 0.00 5,000.00 Total 37,602.50 82,377.00 Media & Education: Video Tape & Slide Show 5,000.00 • 2,000.00 Press Releases 1,500.00 1,000.00 Front-Line Education 800.00 1,500.00 FAM Tour for Travel Editors 1,000.00 0.00 Travel Trade Shows 0.00 7,700.00 _ • Outdoor Billboards 0.00 6,000.00 Telephone Answering Service 0.00 60.00 City of Eagan Economic Dev. Book 0.00 2,000.00 Brochure racks at gas stations 0.00 250.00 Research - Smith Travel Research 0.00 800.00 Total 8,300.00 21,310.00 ' V 1996 CVB Budget-Continued 1995 Proposed 1996 Budget BtAgg Advertising Agency: 8,500.00 0.00 Computer& Fax Services: 300.00 0.00 Group Tour Marketing: 5,200.00 15,200.00 Convention Marketing: 4,000.00 2,150.00 Corporate Marketing & Promotion: 12,000.00 2,500.00 International Marketing: 2,800.00 6,000.00 . Special Events Promotional • Support Fund: 5,000.00 8,000.00 Associations: 3,988.00 5,500.00 Equipment & Maintenance: 0.00 1,000.00 Annual Meeting 0.00 1,500.00 TOTAL 194,840.50 303,002.00 • • • QO 0. m V., 01 9• O vv. c`�,• c? c? co co M O '- .Ny1 r• G) c�) O m O O M N r. O c' M Co CD qt. ch. ww v. H ., N '- N N N N Co CO M (p O ccy if N x .J} �'f .. C...- .w3. k .� •y ,.' , g,1 `'f - is � F C) CD D. ` � 1? ,>< a= y 0 Q t `z K ` y %gY 7 1 - ` /, i f% :v' ; ;a ' .'< "x 4. J• csi N to . . .... , _ Lf Pif - ; . 0 Ql `Z !�`�t ri r1 •. sJ„/i a,;4 :y ..s ,.ff s, N W z c 4. *f,;A Mil IFl •.r• *At rn ::;,4' .24'4- .- i, .fti •f 0 ✓� Eli 5Y'% A: r4� � '^F•�� '4 ' o F W .0 r 3r i C-r •v. •.f tCI 0 IN.. rL`•'..• =;4i •.:s 4 to tr) Q R iC,,, 4.JJ Jl5 Y .. i ,• i%Y` 4^•.- •x,T W 0) V t 'V �'' ,: r F ern �:%}i, v "G;, J{• .���', • U = to 1...., Yrs ,s;✓ ,;i ;•7.4;:! v;- Y=3" f .Y• . n J d1 '.#% dye? y .o... .. f, 'y }' .,;"Fl tg.: 'fe•1 .4, 4,,,, ,';,..'1-d ti4 "1 :.F} y.'" .t, Wig: •! At• .Z. NI rii Jy' et iii, J NI 0' •' •? •r 'a 'f 0 �ta Tom'+ .` � �.r •v >R �.': r (� Q• Cpl/ /� �•;t; $•k / r 54 r 7,,„ If. . , • , Y . 70 N- E A • • _s 0 I Qi !Af N;- . .-.1. i ` -•, , y, .x}; 0 0 2 CO .23 F i4: Y •G • •d� c 13 co c ku fz t . J 7 f-t I .j .Q LLA� fir D:, .,,r, Fl _. _-.,,, -,94 %. ',-; 1 4 -, . _2 ;z 1,... i to-1 ..,-i - =sa,.,. .c.„, 11.'?r,- 'le'l ,"'04 `a N ; :S :r t; t x F I. + C Z .' tv Q o` N O N to CO w .. X30 . v p Z Z 0 '0D to 0 E w rn tr) E ECU E Q J .a to J d cower s, d E to 2 �_ rn °' as n� Q , ' Q 000 V o m c .a •c c '7 0 a . 0 .t.•a, : . i- Z N. Z 0 -t0i Li. 0 Q 0 --a <• V) �O a • .2., . Agenda Information Memo September 20, 1995 Eagan City Council Meeting Q. AWARD BID FOR PLANT MATERIAL, MUNICIPAL SITE ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: Award of Phase 1 landscaping materials for Eagan Municipal Center to Grove in the amount of$29,647 for the base bid. FACTS: • Funding for the landscaping is from the Community Investment Fund,Site Development Eagan Municipal Center. • Bids came in below estimate. • Plant material is "park quality", non-guaranteed, which is typical for City park projects. • Other bids received were as follows: Bachman's $34,634 Schumacher $35,844 MN Valley $36,505 • Wilsons $36,699 Greten Greenhouse $36,769 • Prices are firm until June 1, 1996. • Prices do not include soil, fertilizer, mulch or edging which are additional budget items. o The City may purchase some items from the other suppliers where Grove may have been higher or is unable to supply specific sizes. 43 Agenda Information Memo September 20, 1995 Eagan City Council Meeting R. APPROVE LOCKER ROOM ADDITION, EAGAN CIVIC ARENA ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: To approve construction of locker room addition; Eagan Civic Arena for use by Minnesota Moose. FACTS: • The City Council authorized a working agreement with the Minnesota Moose Hockey Team (Council action, July 11, 1995) • The agreement provides for the construction of a team room. • A.C.C., the Civic Arena architects, have prepared floor plans. The plans have been reviewed by the Minnesota Moose. • The cost for the team room, including fees, is estimated at $100,000. The Moose have a four year agreement to pay for the cost of construction. • A.C.C. will prepare individual plans for electrical, mechanical and structure to be competitively bid. In effect, the City will be the general contractor. • Construction could start as early as late October. Completion by March/April is targeted. ATTACHMENTS: Floor plan, page qie . (-(Y/ 4�'-0" _ 88�� 8" -1 ' 0" • 1 14'-0" ,a 12'-0" I1-0"a HAND DRYERS MOUNTED 6 HAIR DRYING HEIGHT kl 1-1 LY ye, - MECI-!. ' ROOM ' S WER TRAINING - QQ 0 • 6'X10' -,a ROOT 1 9 , ROOM r /i2xlO\NT.1 1 2'x1 ' s, . '� •3T WALLS MIRROR C9 5" C.M.U. MARKER BOARD J.,-" N WALLS -WALL MOUNTED —.----- 011 °l LOCKER ROOM �T' 16.14"x4114" >( i .�l_=,.J I ∎ I I I I I T- I I I W r.:=,-- , klgfir) riV44/141 \--- SHELF, ROD 4 1 41110490 BENCH (TYP.) 1 4'-0 1/16" *--L - - ' -iie-- W aLOCKER ROOM ADDITION e 0_ 6 ALE: we" . 1'-0. • 48'-0" —12" INSULATED PRECAST WALLS • 7NEW LOCKER ROOM (LOW ROOF) - BLOCK (TYP.)—SCUPPER 4 SPLASH A �� [STOOP. iA '. p • eh PARTIAL. ROOF PLAN f(V SCALE: 1/16' • 1'-v" 1 •• (( . Agenda Information Memo September 20, 1995 Eagan City Council Meeting S. APPROVE CHANGE TO COUNCIL_MEETING SCHEDULE FROM NOVEMBER 7 TO NOVEMBER 6 ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: To set the first City Council meeting of November on Monday, November 6 in lieu of November 7, election day. FACTS: • While the City will not have an election in an odd year, staff has been informed that the likelihood of excess levy referendums by one or more of the City's school districts will take place on November 7. F. APPROVAL OF 1996 LANDFILL ABATEMENT GRANT APPLICATION ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: To approve the 1996 application for the Dakota County Landfill Abatement Grant program in the amount of $40,466.. FACTS: • Dakota County provides landfill abatement funding assistance to cities to'support their residential and business recycling efforts. Eligible expenses for grant funds include direct salaries, out-of-pocket costs and promotional materials. A portion of these funds is utilized to pay a proportionate share of the Recycling/Communications Coordinator position and the temporary Recycling Intern position. Application materials are being finalized. ATTACHMENTS: • County reimbursement schedule on page 147 ,tcp ATTACHMENT D-Community Landfill Abatement Funding 1996 1996 Funding Amount Maximum Reimbursement Schedule City 1994 Housing 1995 Landfill Innovation Total Count* Abatement Funding** lundina*** Payment Apple Valley 12,981 $25,761 $1,947 $27,708 Burnsville 20,592 $37,889 $3,089 $40,978 Eagan 20,298 $37,421 $3,045 $40,466 Farmington 2,390 $8,884 $359 $9,242 Hastings 5,807 $14,329 $871 $15,200 Inv r Grove 8,814 $19,121 $1,322 $20,443 Heights .Lak vill 10,401 $21,650 $1,560 $23,210 Lilydal 288 $966 $200 $1,166 M ndota 70 $619 $200 $819 Mendota 3 ,839 $11,193 $576 $11,768 Heights Rosemount 3,551 $10,734 $533 $11,266 Rural SW 4,805 $17,300 $3,800 $21,100 Comm. S. St. Paul 8, 015 $17,847 $1,202 $19,050 Sunfish Lake 157 $758 $200 $958 W. St. Paul 8,528 , $18,665 $1,279 $19,944 Total 110,536 $243,135 $20,183 $263,318 * Based on Preliminary Metro Council 1994 Household Estimates, Final Counts to be released mid-August, 1995 **Funding Formula: Communities over 5,000,$1.57 per Household, plus $5,000 base. Communities under 5,000, $1.57 per Household plus $500 base. 1996 Funding Amounts increased based on 1.5% COLA. ***Innovation Fund Formula: All communities, 0.15 per Household or $200 base per community, whichever provides the greatest. amount. 41 Agenda Information Memo September 20, 1995 Eagan City Council Meeting U. MASSAGE THERAPY ESTABLISHMENT-LICENSE, THE TROPICS, 3942 SIBLEY MEMORIAL HIGHWAY • ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: To approve a massage therapy establishment license for The Tropics located in Cedarvale Mall. FACTS: • Separate applications for individual massage therapists will be necessary and processed upon, their receipt. • Staff and the Police Department have reviewed the application and find no reason to deny it at this time. ATTACHMENTS: • Application form enclosed without page number. • Agenda Information Memo September 20, 1995 Eagan City Council Meeting V. ACCEPT RESIGNATION!APRNRC ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: To accept the resignation of Thomas Wallington as a member of the Advisory Parks, Recreation & Natural Resources Commission. FACTS: • The City received a letter of resignation from the APRNRC dated September 11,from Thomas Wallington. • This position will be filled with other vacancies as a part of Organizational Business in January. ATTACHMENTS:■ Letter of resignation, page 5-0 . • • • • septette) 11, 1995 Mayor City ofr Eagan 3830 Pttot Kaob Qoad ` Eagan, Ma. 55322-18Q' Dear Mayor, TRotas Egait: It is slid deepest neg)et that I test iai on t you ofr 'Ay deeisioa to resign frxoM My positioK as a tembe t ofr tie Advisory Park, Pe mention aad)Ifatunat Qesounees Cowutissioa. I freet vent' sthot(gty about tie work ofr tde. COMMissiot( acid the positive note that it Ras it( the CoststuKity. Ut(froxtut(atety, tReae iaoe beet two sigaifric,aat ehat(ges tint afrfrect My ability to fruity participate iK tie work of t&e CossissioK. ' inst, sty job tespoksibitities Witt be. CRaKgixg Aid Witt teak ide.atifryiag Kew objectives acid time tikes tiat would teatre wte. via Less frtexibitrty to pahtiCipate it( Comsissioa acid CoMtittee business. Second, I Pave bee) accepted to cliasttiae U7ai�veasity's Graduate Public.Ad&iaistratioa Pnogras wRe t . I Witt be puhsuiag a Doetortate Ia Yubtic.�dstiaistnatioa witR a {focus lit aoK pllo{jit MaKage.Meat OK a pant-time basis. My tonst class begins t&is evet(iKg. Re. excitesectt I {fett WReit I tint applied to be OK tRe CoMtissioK is Stitt with Me. *I Rave bee) very itpttessed witR, the work ofr tde. ComsissioK and tRe support tdat it re eaves frost you and aite.sbens pofr tde. City Couaeit. So, it is lot easy boll to to step down. Since I Witt be unable to fruity Costit sysetfr to tRe aetioities ofr tRe Cosstissioa and lit panticutar tRe work ofr tRe. diotz �Jalust Taste orCe, r believe I Lust allow someone else tde. oppolctuaity to sent .Ro Cat( devote tie neeessaiuj asouat ofr tine.. TRavk you fror allowing to to seltve. I wilt Coatiaue to wateJ tde progrtess oft Eagan as it ptaKs fron the fruture. wit:R parks, recreation and aatunal resources as a part ofr tRe web-01r Nye tRat Retps to take Eagat( a tivabte eomtuaity. SiaC , 42nAt■ LD4\9÷, TRotas Vatkiagtoa Cc: Kea QUraa John Oyaaagi 51.1° --- -'-------- - �i - - -- - - , '2,i - Agenda Information Memo September 20, 1995 Eagan City Council Meeting W. RECOMMENDATION, AIRPORT RELATIONS COMMISSION SUPPORT OF CONTINUED SOUND INSULATION FUNDING ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: To approve a resolution recognizing the success of the Part 150 Sound Insulation Program and encouraging continued funding by all agencies. FACTS: • The Airport Relations Commission has found that the Part 150 Sound Insulation Program is one of the most beneficial opportunities available to severely noise impacted residents to improve the livability of their properties. • Funding for this program is dependent upon annual allocations buy congress, the FAA and the MAC. Federal funding for the program is under consideration along with other budget elements in the upcoming congressional session. • Commission members recommend that previous actions by the MAC and FAA be recognized and that funding for this program continue to be supported. ATTACHMENTS: • Staff memorandum and draft resolution on pages..5A—through C _ _ ti J. 1 104 ; MEMO • __.city of eagan TO: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES FROM: ASSISTANT TO THE CITY ADMINISTRATOR HOHENSTEIN DATE: SEPTEMBER 13, 1995 SUBJECT: ARC RECOMMENDATION - SUPPORT FOR SOUND INSULATION FUNDING At its meeting of September 12, 1995, the Airport Relations Commission recommended that the City Council formally recognize the ongoing success of the Part 150 Sound • Insulation Program and the contributions of the MAC and FAA to that program. Further, the Commission recommended that the City Council take a policy position supporting continued funding for the program by Congress and the MAC to insure that the work which has begun can be completed for all eligible homes in the Twin Cities metropolitan area. A draft resolution to that effect is attached for Council consideration. • der.. Assi-tnt to + - City Administrator • • - -- � ------ -- -------- ------ -r. 'i6 CITY OF EAGAN RESOLUTION RECOGNIZING THE SUCCESS OF THE PART 150 SOUND INSULATION PROGRAM AND ENCOURAGING CONTINUED FUNDING BY ALL AGENCIES WHEREAS, the Minneapolis-St. Paul Metropolitan Airports Commission and the Federal Aviation Administration have jointly funded the region's Part 150 Land Use Compatibility Program consisting of sound insulation improvements to eligible homes around the international airport, and WHEREAS,the Part 150 Program is among the most successful and effective aircraft noise abatement strategies available to communities affected by aircraft noise impacts, and WHEREAS, the continued growth of air commerce is an essential element of the health of our national and global economies, and WHEREAS, the ability of airports to meet those demands for growth is largely dependent upon the capacity of those facilities to control and minimize the impacts they cause, and WHEREAS, the federal government is considering levels of funding for this and other programs as a part of the Airport Improvement Act, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City of Eagan acknowledges the contributions of the Metropolitan Airports Commission and the Federal Aviation Administration to the success of the Part 150 Sound Insulation Program and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City strongly encourages Congress to support continued funding for the Part 150 Sound Insulation Program as a part of the Airport Improvement Act. CITY OF EAGAN CITY COUNCIL By: Its Mayor Attest: • • Its Clerk 53 Motion made by: Seconded by: Those in favor: Those against: Dated: CERTIFICATION I, E.J. VanOverbeke, Clerk of the City of Eagan,Dakota County, Minnesota, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted by the City Council of the City of Eagan, Dakota County, Minnesota, in a regular meeting thereof assembled this day of , 1995. E.J. VanOverbeke, City Clerk City of Eagan • I� Jl Agenda Information Memo September 20, 1995 X. CONTRACT 92-EE,LEXINGTON POINTE 8TH ADDN ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: Acknowledge completion of Contract 92-EE (Lexington Pointe 8th Addition-Streets&Utilities) and authorize perpetual City maintenance subject to warranty provisions. FACTS: • The installation of public streets and utilities to service the Lexington Pointe 8th Addition(located east of Lexington Avenue between Diffiey Road and Lexington Pointe Parkway)was installed privately by the developer under the terms and conditions of the development contract agreement for that subdivision. All public improvements have been completed in accordance with authorized plans and specifications and they are now in order for formal acknowledgement of completion and authorization of perpetual City maintenance subject to warranty provisions. • • SC Agenda Information Memo September 20, 1995 Y. PROJECT 684,WELL NO 18 ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: Authorize the preparation of a feasibility report, detailed plans and specifications for Well No. 18. FACTS: • The approved 1995 Budget provided for the drilling and development of another well(Well No. 18)to be performed during 1995. • This next well will be developed in the south well field (Pilot Knob and Cliff Road area). However, the exact location could not be determined until the geologic groundwater model analysis had been performed. Now that this computer model has been completed, it has been . determined that the most efficient location for Well No. 18 will be north of Cliff Road between Pilot Knob Road and ChesMar Drive. This is referenced as Site"A" on the attached location map. ATTACHMENTS: • South well field location map, page 5 S•To - O O 2 -,,,,, k LQ N in F _ 17 N N J �j Z W OZ (�� Cl) a a O 3 Whh V/ F F Lt G Q Q Q W 6t V W H W ¢ O N p O m i" Q 0 I � pwel g x xW x xr. ° e. Ea ° R �.L. . 1 W W C W W 6. p d Z d . -• _ -W 0 LL �0 —+=1 , 0- 0-�o—o ® - -- - __ : 1 ^r,vl • ,`1�11V/'4 .'� 01, 11111 '.`". .,: i:_„, 1: 0,11t.. .0 .4., Liviekoliiii.. ipaie 4 ........=.;:.::::,. s'"_ ,,,ormi .._._ \' / TT\moor-litt s .. • . ' rgi _ It MI - OtALW 01111 ' OA 110 : NM TAIWAN" 0 AM AI ?Irk ilkii..40, 1111111 ei ■ • . MI , ‘,111151M 111171 al a . 2 la ...,...,-, 741■ 11114 6 •� Ci i .0 i .Irk x W �,'� N MN 111111 *1 LEW! op , limi Trap 11011Z, 111111 I-41 VA" _ • - ;p — F�+■ - I I Tyr / _- ' ..,fir FAO :� , ..nr, , , I ( III 1 I • ay k. mu- p■iuns As' li NW* , . tok figlia‘ In 211 ON_C El II- , i � a Nob jai :•;:a;: i � l` L ' , AI 111111 — zWe=0 -.,;: - ' -^ I I _' II "r of 1 "----• YZ .,0Z a WN■ /if uo , 6 hi � _� 1 1 1 1 1 1 • I I �� —41 Z . 11 i fa. N �� t�. �u �' p I� o .NIU'JV a oohs ar 40 4111r a it � . I •9) Ei_v_4. LN`I ` •.' 1 M�-It 1 ,I2 , `∎ N .. –414111111111 0. 111. . I NI �J W ‘:L- . f- _ ' 1 1 I 110 ro I :] 4"3'' � aVi CrwoN I I C 1 j /c ,, _ - 2144Fivp ,x."--j ,,-, 1 Agenda Information Memo September 20, 1995 Z. PROJECT 696.WELL NO.19 ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: Authorize the preparation of a feasibility report, detailed plans and specifications for Well No. 19. FACTS: • The draft 1996 Budget and Capital Improvement Program proposes to develop the next well (Well No. 19)in the south well field during 1996. • Due to recent State Legislation restricting the development of new wells until completion and adoption of wellhead protection, emergency contingency and conservation plans, it would be timely for the City to submit an application to drill this next well prior to October 1, 1995. • Since 1989,the City has added only one new well to its water supply system while the number of connections will have increased by 40% (12,500 to estimated 17,500), the total volume of water pumped will have increased by 27% (additional 550,000,000 gallons per year), and the population will have increased by 47%(40,500 to estimated 59,500). • According to the recently completed geologic groundwater modeling analysis,the best location for this next well in the south well field has been determined to be near the intersection of the Hlighline Trail and Thomas Lake Road as shown on the enclosed location plan of the south well field. ATTACHMENTS: • Location map, page Sfer • • Smg - - — . • Qa N r In O = = dt a a O Z Z Z r 41 F J z a Q «'Yt� Z G 3 3 f7 W = W W J W ,L1 y I 1 �s�p '''.-=-::-:,1% " ,, Z O W 3 ZW f WW a al*� 5 L' J 0 w a a ° ° u3 ° J ~ _' Z ° N N @ N 3 p a O F- O Q Q W 1f >< W Q N J W W a W W eL x e. F. i d O ^.'_L.:: .. .. .Q o w V I sN t -D-�_.0 ® __. ___-_ �� %1 1 1 F O r i l 1 \ I I I H 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 jVt ! B 1F2) # ' • vats INFO, _ 1.5. _*a— .E. Adir 0. l'. lb, wire. salli ---. 0,Kilv . tO bib. MO NB III I IiIID1, �, \�►imilu _ - as 1....._ -1 •••:_'-;r•j,:',-.,..,::::.]. ?qv OM 414 u N .Mt, 1.1 Z . 1110111111 -, IIIK7 war 2 lit4P"Acti— . I 16/ Ilia .. . 40i al / tsup.. , / ' .., .44 NIP 1 / � AIQ : ' W -rw • a mot- 1 1 1 1 1 �•y� 'r;l . %mg A: •116 Fur • -:. .5. ....., ... ,„.0/ .-:::...,,., : Mg) V 1 1 1 r SI% Ara .- .. 1 / ! OZ 11 „pZ• / el Mons au MI Y v , . _..] :- - I I 1 1 1 1 2 W -- - :•. WN s Hz W sIL I Tim'——r– Ill I .:.::.:1 :c:r phi ilk — 411,4, 1 II I cs791/ lI s1 11,411711111111 sNi 1 PI, killig 3 = i 411111111111 = .,[Ti I i% , w.v111111. . jo I il 0 : N � ' _ I I •■•• - a- � . = ilk r woHi � I I I Weft L15:VIT(7)> .....:• 1 , C�' I MI Mt MP VW UM ion IMP MP rola Mg Wm MN atm era ow Imo = IMF IMP 'il. Agenda Information Memo September 20, 1995 Eagan City Council Meeting AA. FINAL SUBDNISION - GARDENWOOD PONDS ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: • To approve a Final Subdivision for Gardenwood Ponds located south of Wescott Road, north of Northview Park Road and east of Stoney Point Road. FACTS: • George Seagraves, representing D.R. Horton, has requested approval of the first phase of the Gardenwood Ponds Final Subdivision. Issues regarding wetland preservation and roadway alignments have been resolved. The final engineering plans, escrow agreements, and development contracts should be in order for City Council final approval on September 20, 1995. If there are any problems suggesting this item is not ready for final approval, staff will so note at the Council meeting. • A final plat map will be available at the City Council meeting. • • toe 0 _ _ — Agenda Information Memo September 20, 1995 Eagan City Council Meeting OB. REFUSE HAULER'S COMMERCIAL LICENSE UWS TRANSFER INC. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: To continue indefinitely the consideration of a commercial refuse hauler's license for UWS Transfer Inc. FACTS: • United Waste Systems of Connecticut has purchased Poor Richard's, a previously licensed commercial hauler operating in the City of Eagan. The company submitted a hauler license application to accommodate a name change for the business. At the time of submission, the company hadn't received certification from the Secretary of State permitting to use the name UWS Transfer Inc., in the state of Minnesota. In the interim,a Minnesota corporation,United Waste Systems of Lakeville,successfully challenged the Secretary of State's action and an order has been issued limiting the Connecticut firm's use of the United Waste Systems or UWS names in Minnesota. As a consequence, staff has informed the applicant of the need for a formal certification from the Secretary of State indicating the business name they will operate under prior to approval of this business license. • This item was previously continued at the Council meeting of September 5. Until the name issue can be resolved at the Secretary :of State's office, staff is recommending an indefinite continuance. • • W 1 Agenda Information Memo September 20, 1995 Eagan City Council Meeting CC. FINAL SUBDIVISION - DEERWOOD TOWNHOMES ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: To approve a Final Subdivision for Deerwood Townhomes project located north of Deerwood Drive and east of I-35E.. FACTS: • Final plans, escrow agreement, and development contract are being reviewed and should be in order for City Council approval of the Final Plat on September 20, 1995. • Staff is trying to get this Final Plat reviewed and ready for Council approval on September • 20 so that a related contract for public improvements can also be authorized at the same meeting. Otherwise,the contract bid will expire and we will need to commence the process all over again. If there are any problems with final approval, staff will so advise the Council at its meeting on September 20th. BACKGROUND/ATTACHMENTS: (1) Final Plat Map, page (.0 • . (P.'1glNaor4 orrostse r O to w walla+wort or Mr rut I .tan) PM .as) [i t • ♦ r ora•el•• 41640 a - 1 j■~ i r •Y,•bgtl',1• M• 4,4 . .• r I. . • „- I UtCitit All e ifli ,... �M tAla • `T' ,fro • • \,...\ c:-. 1,,... IS It 0 •�� term.' •� •• ` +•e� � • 4 ,• L J \ ;•"46. t�j ) .1 �j� 4 •�•,a •e4,•.• ` -p y� • Y it N 0 . . . 41\Nd • it .$ ..„. ta . . \ . , . 12.4;,6,0;0:11,1111114..,Iss IN _ yy Z• �/ •6• Dom• �"� �!� I. �', • A y ?_' \'- •1 04 ' • + 1.00.0.` %-P-1)..t.. rft ..\.-.% ' ,. .•*• 000.• + y �'.'`' ~� .. h co 4. \ _ 's.,„' .,47k. sefe:• .VAN• it i:444•44:*• 7 %..4 • • s%, • *44,•• .,,, ;PI" 54 4°s'.� + ',,,, s moss't / 4roa ! •w•rq 1 ' A+0 4.—tan' •xx.alr I 1 UMW V/IEVII2 In, 1 HEIM FRANZ a\ tut=Hum WPM SUM MOM% • . I j s� 2b mm .4@ 1 d S Afp Q O ,3=i� ay c.1 a e C9 Q: F., Q• i - • • d q; M I M �: N m =• i y :1;t z a R° • tS 4 •Cr kNf/" v Al / A I o Z yew ! s - � ; m C �.. .g - s �I (.17.3 . • • Agenda Information Memo September 20, 1995 A. PROJECT 691,CLEMSON DRIVE ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: To close the public hearing and approve/deny the installation of Project 691 (Clemson Drive- Streets &Utilities), and, if approved, authorize the preparation of detailed plans and specifications. FACTS: • In response to a petition submitted by the Dakota County Housing&Redevelopment Authority (HRA), the City Council authorized the preparation of a feasibility report. This report was presented to the City Council on August 15 and a formal public hearing was scheduled for September 20 to formally present and discuss these proposed improvements. • All notices have been published in the legal newspaper and sent to all property owners affected by either the construction or assessments associated with this project(ISD#196, County HRA and City Parks Department). As of this date, staff has not received any objections to the proposed project which provides for continuation of the previously planned extension of Clemson Drive to its intersection with Johnny Cake Ridge Road. ATTACHMENTS: • Feasibility report, pages ( S 4 4. city of Qacjan Report for Clemson Drive Street and Utility Improvements City Project No. 691 Eagan, Minnesota August 1995 File No. 49569 Bonestroo Rosene Anderlik & Associat s Enpin ors et Architects St. Paul, Mlnnssota • CO S Bonestroo,Rosene,Anderllk and Associates,Inc.Is an Affirmative Actlon/Equal Opportunity Employer Bonestroo Otto G.Bonestroo,P.E. Howard Sanford,P E. Michael C.Lyneh,P E. Brian K Gage,P1. Robert W.Rosene,P.E.• Keith A.Gordon.,P.E. James R.Maland,P.E. F.Todd Foster,P.E. Rosene Joseph C.Anderllk,P.E. Robert R.Pfefferle,P.E. Jerry D.Pertzsch,P.E. Keith R.Yapp,P.E. EZZMRichard E.Turner,P.E. David 0.Marvin L Sorvala,P.E. Richard W.Foster,P.E. Scott J.Arganek,P.E. Douglas J.Benoit,P.E. s Anderson,P E. ecilGustafson,P E.Anderlik Si Glenn R.Cook,P.E. Robert C.Ru ek,AA. Mark R RoifE. Co Olivier,P ri Thomas E.Noyes,P.E. Jerry A.Bourdon,P.E. Mark A.Selp,P.E. Kent J.Wagner,P.E. ASSOCidte�1 Robert G.Schunicht,P.E. Mark A.Hanson,P.E. Gary W.Morten,P.E. Paul G.Heuer,P.E. Susan M.Eberlln,C.P.A.• Michael T.Rautmann,P.E. Paul J.Gannon,A.I.A. John P.Gorder,P.E. Engineers & •Senior Consultant Ted K.Field,P.E. Daniel J.Edgerton,P.E. Dan D.Boyum,P.E. 9 Thomas R.Anderson,A.I.A. A.Rick Schmidt,P.E. Jeffrey.1.Ehleringer,P.E. James R.Rosenmerkel,P.E. Dale A.Grove,P.E. Joseph R.Rhein,P.E. Donald C.Burgardt,P.E. Philip J.Caswell,P.E. Lee M.Mann,P.E. Thomas A.Syfko,P.E. Mark D.Wallis,P.E. Charles A.Erickson August 31, 1995 Frederic J.Stenborg,P.E. Mlles B.Jensen,P.E. Leo M.Pawelsky Ismael Martinez,P.E. L Phillip Gravel,P.E. Harlan M.Olson Michael P.Rau,P.E. Karen L Wlemerl,P.E. Agnes M.Ring Thomas W.Peterson,P.E. Gary D.Krlstofltz,P.E. James F.Engelhardt ■ City of Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan,MN 55122 Re: Clemson Drive Street and Utility Improvements Project No. 691 Our File No.49569 • Dear Mayor and Council: • Attached is ow report for the Clemson Drive Street and Utility Improvements associated with the Dakota County • HRA Family Housing project. The proposed utility extensions and street/trail improvements are presented and discussed within the report along with detailed cost estimates and a preliminary assessment roll. We will be pleased to meet with the Council and other interested parties at a mutually convenient time to discuss the report. Sincerely, , BONE TRO , ENE,ANDERLIK&ASSOCIATES,INC. /// 4/744a _- MarIA,Hanson PLG:cmi Encl. I hereby certify that this report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Registered Professional Engineer the laws of the State of • Minneso G4 / Mark A.Hanson ' � Date: August 31. 1995 _ Reg.No. 14260 Reviewed .y: D- r,artment of Pub,'c k orks Reviewed by: Finance Department Date: 2335 West Highway 36 • St. Paul, MN 13 ■ -636-4600 CLEMSON DRIVE STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS EAGAN,MINNESOTA PROJECT NO.691 TABLE OF CONTENTS • PAGE LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS 2 SCOPE 3 FEASIBILITY AND RECOMMENDATION 3 DISCUSSION 4 SANITARY SEWER 4 WATER MAIN 4 STORM SEWER 4 STREET 4 TRAIL 5 STREET LIGHTING 5 COST ESTIMATE 6 EASEMENTS AND PERMITS 7 AREA TO BE INCLUDED 7 ASSESSMENTS 7 REVENUE SOURCES 9 PROJECT SCHEDULE 9 APPENDIX A-PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE APPENDIX B -PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL FIGURE NO. 1 -LOCATION PLAN FIGURE NO. 2- SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENTS FIGURE NO. 3 -WATER MAIN IMPROVEMENTS FIGURE NO. 4- STORM SEWER, STREET, AND TRAIL IMPROVEMENTS FIGURE NO. 5 - STREET AND TRAIL IMPROVEMENTS • FIGURE NO. 6 -TYPICAL SECTIONS FIGURE NO. 7 -ASSESSMENTS C•01 REPORT FOR CLEMSON'DRIVE STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS EAGAN,MINNESOTA PROJECT NO. 691 Scope This project provides for the improvement of Clemson Drive east of Johnny Cake Ridge Road to Clemson Circle. The improvements include utilities, trail and street. The project is being considered at this time due to the proposed Dakota County HRA housing project through the Eagan Family Housing Limited Partnership. The report is the result of a June 23, 1995 petition and was authorized by the City Council on July 11, 1995. In addition to the Eagan Family Housing property, other properties directly adjacent to this project are owned by the City and the School District. Provisions for the improvement of Clemson Drive have been made through previous improvements to the east and west of the project area. The scope of this report includes only the street and utility work associated with Clemson Drive. However,the internal street and utilities for the Family Housing Development could be added to the project if requested by the Developers. Feasibility and Recommendations The project is feasible from an engineering standpoint and is in accordance with the objectives established in the Eagan's Comprehensive Sanitary Sewer and Water Plans. The project can best be carried out as one contract. 49569sps 3 Log • •. . it Discussion Sanitary Sewer Sanitary sewer service for the project will be provided by extending sewer westward from the Trails of Thomas Lake Development. A drawing of the proposed sewer is shown on Figure No. 2 at the • back of this report. Sewer will be extended to the east and west entrances to the proposed • development and will be stubbed into the development. An alternative sewer alignment through the school property was considered as part of this report but was eliminated because of additional sewer depth and required easements. Water Main Water main proposed herein will consist of connecting to existing water main stubs at the east and west ends of the project. The water main will be 8 inches in diameter with stubs into each of the development's streets. A drawing of the proposed water main is shown on Figure No. 3 at the back of this report. The project area is located in the high pressure zone and is expected to experience static and residual pressures of approximately 91.1 to 82.5 and 70.2 to 61.6 psi(pounds per square inch), respectively based on a preliminary grading plan for the housing project. Storm Sewer Storm sewer proposed herein is shown on Figure No. 4 at the back of this report. Storm sewer consists of piping to collect direct runoff from Clemson Drive as well as outlet piping from two storm water ponds located on the Family Housing Development. The storm sewer will discharge into an existing 18" storm sewer and flow southward through city park property to Pond BP-6. Storm water ponding for the development will be defined as part of the final grading plan for the development. Total flow from the two ponds should be limited to 6 cfs. Direct runoff from Clemson Drive can not be diverted to the proposed ponds due to grade differences. Therefore,the 3.9 acres of direct runoff will be conveyed directly into the existing sewer. • 49569spt ' 4 (429 Street Proposed street construction for this project consists of improving Clemson Drive between Johnny Cake Ridge Road and it's existing terminous in the Trails of'Thomas Lake Development. The proposed street improvements are shown on Figure No.5 at the back of this report. Typical sections • for Clemson Drive are shown on Figure No. 6. The street widths for Clemson Drive will vary for three reasons: 1. A right turn lane will be constructed at the intersection with Johnny Cake Ridge Road. 2. A parking lane will be included along part of the south side of the road. 3. The east end of the proposed street construction will match the in-place 32'wide road. Street construction will include curb radii for the two street connections for the proposed development and will connect to an existing parking lot entrance for the school. Grading for the street will be completed as part of this project. The proposed street section is shown below. 1" Type 41B Bituminous Wear Course 2" Type 31B Bituminous Base Course 6" Class 5 Aggregate Base Trail Bituminous trail is proposed to be constructed along the south side of Clemson Drive between Johnny Cake Ridge Road and Clemson Circle. Trail within the proposed development and any required trail on the north side of Clemson'Drive will be completed by the developers. Trail easements will be required from the school property and Lots 11 and 12 on the east end of Clemson Drive. • Street Lighting Street lights are proposed to be constructed along both sides of Clemson Drive between Johnny Cake Ridge Road and the existing terminous in the Trails of Thomas Lake Development. The proposed street light improvements are shown on figure No. 8 at the back of this report. 49569.rpt 5 O i -- Cost Estimate A detailed cost estimate is presented in Appendix A located at the back of this report and is summarized below. The total estimated project cost is $279,920.00, which includes 5% contingencies and 30%,for indirect costs. Indirect costs include administrative,engineering,interest, and legal expenses. Clemson Driye Estimated Costs Sanitary Sewer $41,900 Water Main 49,040 Storm Sewer 42,200 Street • 116,710 Trail 15,500 Trail Easements 5,500 Street Lights .0 970 Total Estimated Project Cost $279,920 49569w 6 ral • Easements and Permits The majority of the easements and right-of-way required for the project will be acquired as part of the plat for the Family Housing Development. A 10'wide trail easement will be required from the School District and Lots 11 and 12, Block 1 of the Trails of Thomas Lake along Clemson Drive. A temporary grading easement will also be needed from the School District. Permits for the project will • be required from the following units: • MPCA Sewer Extension Permit MHD Water Main Extension Permit MPCA Storm Water Permit Area to be Included Wilmus Addition • Lot 1,Block 1 (School District) Outlot A(City Park) * * Assessments to this parcel will be distributed to other properties based on an April 10, 1989 City agreement titled "Land Dedication Agreement between City of Eagan and EHW Properties". • NW 1/4 Section 28 PID 10-02800-025-50 Mallard and Park 4th Addition(PID 10-2800-024-50) Assessments Assessments are proposed to be levied against the benefitted property in accordance with Eagan's assessment policy. Sanitary Sewer Sanitary sewer proposed herein is lateral sewer. It is proposed to assess 100% of the sanitary sewer costs to the proposed development. The estimated total assessment is $41,900.00. a 49569.tvt 7.11, ! I II 11 i Water Main Water main proposed herein is lateral water main. It is proposed to assess the water main costs to the adjacent benefitting properties (including the school and park properties) on a front foot basis. The estimated assessable cost is $49,040.00. The assessable footage is 1839 feet. Therefore,the proposed water main assessment rate is$26.67/assessable feet. Storm Sewer It is proposed to assess 100% of the storm sewer costs to the proposed development. The estimated assessment is$42,200.00. Street It is proposed to assess the street costs to the adjacent benefitting properties on a front foot basis. The estimated total street cost is$116,710.00. The total assessable footage is 1839 feet. Therefore, the proposed street assessment rate is$63.46/assessable foot. Trail 100% of the bituminous trail costs and trail easment costs are to be funded through the Park Trail Dedicated Fund. Street Lighting It is proposed to assess the street light costs to the adjacent benifitting properties on a front foot basis. The estimated total street light cost is $9,070.00. The total assessable footage is 1,839 feet. Therefore,the proposed street assessment rate is $4.93/assessable foot. Trunk Assessments No trunk area assessments are proposed as part of this project. The following trunk assessments have been previously paid for the development areas: Storm Sewer. Sanitary Sewer. Water Main. 49569.'pt 8 City Park Property The terms of an agreement with EHW Properties calls for assessments against the City Park property (Outlot A of WlImus Addition)to be assessed against other properties in the Wilmus Addition. This agreement is titled`Land Dedication Agreement between the City of Eagan and EHW Properties and is dated April 10, 1989. The parcels identified in the 1989 agreement as responsible for the Outlot A assessment include Parcel 10-2800-024-50 and Parcel 10-2800-025-50. Revenue Sources Revenue sources for Project 691 are shown below. Item Project Cost Assessable Cost Balance Sanitary Sewer $41,900 $41,900 0 Water Main 49,040 49,040 0 Storm Sewer 42,200 42,200 0 Street 1 16,710 116,710 0 Trail 15,500 0 15,500 Trail Easements 5,500 0 5,500 Street Lights _ 9.070 9.070 _ (_ Totals $279,920 $258,920 $21,000 PROJECT SCHEDULE • Present Feasibility Report August 15, 1995 Public Hearing September 20, 1995 Approve Plans and Specifications September 20, 1995 Open Bids/Receive Easements/Award Contract October 17, 1995 Substantial Completion of Utilities November 30, 1995 Complete Construction June 1996 . Assessment Hearing Fall 1996 - First Payment Due with Real Estate Taxes May 1997 • 49569 r, I I 9 i 1 u 11 APPENDIX A PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE CLEMSON DRIVE STREET& UTILITIES IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT NO.691 $anitary Sewer • 290 LF 8" PVC sanitary sewer 0'-10'deep @ $21.00/1f $ 6,090.00 160 LF 8" PVC sanitary sewer 10'-12'deep @ $24.00/lf 3,840.00 180 LF 8" PVC sanitary sewer 12'44'deep @ $25.00/lf 4,500.00 180 LF 8" PVC sanitary sewer 14'-16'deep @ $29.00/lf 5,220.00 5 EA Std 4'diameter MH w/cstg @ $1,400.00 ea 7,000.00 12.5 LF MH depth greater than 8 ft. deep @ $80.00/1f 1,000.00 810 LF Improved pipe foundation @ $3.00/1f 2,430.00 1 EA Connect to existing MH @ $620.00 ea 620.00 Subtotal • $30,700.00 +5% Contingency 1.535.00 Subtotal $32,235.00 +30% Indirect Costs • 9.665.00 Total Sanitary Sewer $41,900.00 Water Main 20 LF 6"DIP water main @ $19.00/1f $ 380.00 1,030 LF 8" DIP water main @ $23.00/if 23,690.00 2 EA Connect to existing water main @ $700.00 ea 1,400.00 5 EA 8" gate valve&box @ $700.00 ea 3,500.00 2 EA 6" gate valve&box @ $400.00 ea 800.00 2,094 LB Fittings @ $1.60/1b 3,350.00 2 EA Hydrant @ $1,400.00 ea 2,800.90 Subtotal $35,920.00 +5% Contingency 1.890.00 Subtotal $37,720.00 • +30% Indirect Cost - 11.320.00 Total Water Main $49,040.00 49569.rpt • 10 1 c • Storm Sewer 290 LF 15"RCP CL5 @ $24.00/1f $ 6,960.00 365 LF 18" RCP CL5 @ $27.00/1f 9,855.00 7 LF 4'dia Standard CBMH @ $1200.00/ea 8,400.00 2 EA 2'x 3'Standard CB @ $800.00/ea • 1,600.00 2 EA . 15" RCP Apron @ $600.00/ea 1,200.00 30 CY CL2 Rip Rip @ $65.00/cy 1,950.00 2 EA Structure Markers @ 50.00/ea 100.00 1 LS Locate and connect to exist pipe @ $835.00/ea 835.00 Subtotal $30,900.00 +5% Contingency 1.545.00 Subtotal $32,445.00 +30% Indirect Cost 9.755.00 Total Storm Sewer $42,200.00 Street 1940 LF B618 Concrete curb &gutter @ $8.00/1f $11,640.00 96 SY Concrete valley, gutter @ $20.00/sy 1,920.00 3000 CY Common excavation @ $6.00/cy 18,000.00 140 LF Remove existing concrete curb @ $4.00/1f 560.00 200 SY Remove existing bituminous @ $2.00 400.00 1 LS Subgrade preparation @ $5,000.00/ls 5,000.00 450 CY Subgrade correction @ $8.00/cy 3,600.00 1800 TN Class 5 Aggregate base @ $7.00/tn 12,600.00 440 TN Type 31B Bituminous base @ $25.00/tn 11,000.00 220 TN Type 41B Bituminous wear @ $29.00/tn 6,380.00 250 GAL Bituminous tack coat @ $1.48/gal 370.00 6 EA Adjust manhole @ $300.00/ea 1,800.00 4 EA Adjust gate valve @ $150.00/ea 600.00 250 CY Topsoil borrow (LV) @ $6.00Icy 1,500.00 1700 SY Sod in place @ $2.50/sy 4,250.00 0.9 AC Seed w/mulch&fertilize @ $1,200.00/ac 1,080.00 1 LS Traffic Control @ $4,800.00/1s 4,800.00 Subtotal $85,500.00 • +5 % Contingency 4.275.00 Subtotal $89,775.00 +30 % Indirect Costs 26.935.00 Total Street $116,710.00 49569.tpt 11 (49 Trail 20 CF Remove existing curb and gutter @ $4.00/1f $ 80.00 30 SY Remove existing bituminous @ $2.00/sy 60.00 20 LF Concrete curb and gutter @ $10.00/1f 200.00 1 LS Trail base preparation @ $1,500.00/1s 1,500.00 530 TN Class 5 Aggregate base for trail @ $8.00/tn 4,240.00 175 TN Bituminous wear for trail @ $30.00/tn 5.250.00 Subtotal $11,330.00 +5 % Contingency 570.00 Subtotal $11,900.00 +30 % Indirect Costs 3.600.00 Total Trail $15,500.00 Street Lights • 6 EA 100 Watt Street Lights @ $1,200.00/ea $7.200.00 Subtotal $7,200.00 +5% Contingency 3.60.00 Subtotal $7,560.00 +20 % Indirect Costs $1.510.00 Total Street Lights $9,070.00 49569.tpt 12 °..—/ el? APPENDIX B PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL CLEMSON DRIVE STREET AND UTILITIES IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT NO. 691 Parcel Sanitary Water Storm Street Description ewer Main Sewer Street Trail Lights Total Wilnlus Addn. Lot 1 Block 1 0 $11,280 0 26,845 0 $2,088 $40,213.00 OutLot A* 0 13,947 0 33,192 0 2,580 49,719.00 NWI/a Sec. 28 Parcel025-50 41.90Q 23.813 42.200 56.673 Q 4.402 168.988.00 TOTAL $41,900 $49,040 $42,200 $116,710 0 $9,070 $258,920.00 * Assessment to this parcel to be distributed to other properties per Land Dedication Agreement between the City of Eagan and EHW Properties dated April 10, 1989. Properties identified as responsible for the Outlot A assessments include Parcels 024-50 (proposed Mallard Park 4th Addition) and 025-50 (proposed HRA Development). • • Ao440 vrd . , 11 I I i d li • �l� •'- -- rot ar-M l I)iI1 - - - ,. - - "� /.{tr:'•': �t���: 111111 1{ 1 .rr.�r �'�� l�'1111111.■ •� Y �. •V-z at •• # u:�_..011" .�� P.• I ; r Mr �ry� ♦ 4_ 111:«�■1 I I • •w" I t fir _ z, it ,` ;����� 11. �PI.l O :/.'�. • _ ... I \\ �' �s, +s a. ♦AI r t: ( �? t,%�.1T 4545. ♦.1111 :S4 qo. ■U" 2 ►w....., i4 + P VW a 115,45! Alvan minim - , .L■ 1111 v II.:- .. . ` ♦...%t 11LJf - ti e .��♦1• r„:■.■ °::ifi%/F.`no r�„aanara . / �_,/ + C.��I m 45111 n r.r 4 / l=11.1111: . rata...r w I11n! r ..Gr:.rte r:X11 CLEA/SON . - ...dill I h1 1 L A OI✓ECTLOCA emu_ • law 11 • I'f"' LEY ROAD r --i ',� I .� ,�,r ►; I"�Is -i Aril iG •'D> • ' ' 1 u lk cut• Q 1 Plink i„ - i I I ,���' �• tar E nit� :* rv. ,..._- I' 1!■l1!r Q A . g- S t ••r R ll ' om r y \ / j ;± i. ■ dit• 7,.. 14,..Am s 1, Fp--4,,z. et• :"k-04 VIII w.:::.:..!: rza Sri _ if 4JIJ K.77'-*- , ; 430:1 Lee E.,,STA%S.-;:t1,214,,...t4 ii* r-' '' I , `�/ 1 11111 �'■ '` ... ,:ii, 1.11 .,,:,�! a (/1\''''.\ ME".. V "4 7gYi•. ”-1:'‘;....:: "'O..'11111.44 0 . -- — —! -- 171_ L11� _ _1111�j //��/V^'I Cif-I��, I�lil r�� ILs .. ', �_ j l Flill a. +cii ;&� :+ J1Y 'i, 4!t� I "l .,„,,,,e. ..11 11 I in; fir.4545 .` i'1�: .rid rt.� i • *{s! 0.•Tit,�r11ts♦ �:► fiF' 11: 0„,..z.` t mu 1 � -—- _ I/I r Ilhitt‘ _• st qty' ` • M�± ���I N. fit IliIii 4R G •I► I I Ialtra "1�r:. / •� I 4e• a 64 • . I<r„- •�;I I 1 II, • gilli..4. I NI I 1 ilk.1 --f -- _ _ --- --1-- -- 0 1000 2000 • Seats In fed • LOCATION PLAN Bon atroo • • Roe n EAGAN, MINNESOTA And rllk b CLEMSON DRIVE - STREET & UTILITY IM Fl CO 11 ASSoclat a CITY PROJECT No. 691 •neCnrn• n IIn — - --- Ii I I l- y \19 22 23 QO oac9� �� SANITARY SEWER 1°'IRAI►\0 21 24 `,26,, Q 13° 40 41 .r �. BY OTHERS ' 17 'S' 2 4\ .DAKOTA Co. H,R.A. - ,. 14e 45 / 025-50 �.,� 11 `3 / V sZs ■ ? 0 SS/ / Y Y 33 `V '� o` PROPOSED 7 °= 1 / ss o�F\ SAN/TARY -�.�e •° •ss 3° 35 J -- Aso SEWER 3 4 37 . Cl SS —SS-4k 2\ 2. I 3. �e 71 • I / \�~' "� � 4s SS `.. '� �`?ii � r,�` � r 11 SS I �3 • \ / II 1 . 10 9 2, yt - ; ,'II p,DDil e 1 i '��`!1 1r,-- �I' CRV PARK \ 4 ! 1 g., 015--U ...lam - `I I` 1 1 I I r OUROT A { j1 WILM / If 1 12-_-_-_434- e sal .0 ' / 1 L J L J /,AS f7....„.. t_rrc;; , �' `�N — - ~'r • N 0 150 300 Seal, in feet SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENTS Bonestroo . • _ .-- • Rosene EAGAN, MINNESOTA, FIGURE Anderlik 6 CLEMSON DRIVE — STREET AND UTILITY IM , • Associat s CITY PROJECT No. 691 • D 4� /� 7 022-50 O }} `\ 19 22 23 /� Q °°o A WATER MAIN +ate „Ls� - 24. /26 O\w cy� BY OTHERS „ .. /26 30 41 / "y2,\ ,° ry s- , ./ 42 TA Co. H.R.A. „1 w � 46 ` \\, 025-50 ` 11s' 13 / *0 / // �` 10 91�{ 3 `C C'O /tM/ PROPOSED 7 `i" l ��B"IIMTEi9 .�6 ° X36 J5 —�,49 y MQ/N ° 3�' �, - 2 w 40 t1`Q �t w '���t m �'t w �/ `.:11 4;'a —0:1`0„1,4 r 11 ON ° 4° 47r' 10 9 w t ,,� 7 w -w, U ,y„�J62/1 Cm PARK 4 r l L 11-5.) OtmOT A � X167 WI" Yj- 1 -_--rL J L J ° ffl- akii 1/Ex. Water Main AS 2 Constructed �- , `)_ - �1\ TN/ J • / With School �----------:-- "-- _.„----4,...„ With m ! 1, .. i • t 4 • N 0 150 300 Seoie to feet WATER MAIN IMPROVEMENTS J 1 Bon stroo - - - - —- - — ■,' Ros ne EAGAN, MINNESOTA FIGURE 3 Anderlik & • Asaoclates CLEMSON .DRIVE - STREET AND UTILITY IM CITY PROJECT No. 691 1 AOSAQFn4 nwr Al in I C T 1 04&_ - — -_ rOMtit_ do_ (3 • 'I /7 1 022-50 4:OV/ % • ii„ i t9 22 23/ 00 ---- `y0o 0. / 111 26 I39 41 �4�,LJ`;;`� Di' i�DAKOTA Co. H.R.A.•--.�_ is 16 '~, '26 2 I. 4/' �..__ 14 / 29 t ' s 1i �. ( 46 43 f .!• 9880 025-50 11 13 ; �V _ 45 .�\ -.2 e//' PROPOSED -, ,o i 32 3 �� (; Q /;' ♦.\ , �'.r. 67/ORI 7 9 i 1 ..\. ''' .,,,;�,,�� t.. SEVER 6 / / 36 .. - . ' \:� ' " ,/ r $ Fk ., � iY fr� /MP. 3 5 4/ / 3 Cl , , . s �..r , �. , , Q 49 f C?„,,\ 1 i y MYl-9]6.0 4 1 i 40 2 xf 1' �, -j-` 'Q/ -- _.. / i 41 4 /' i l II ‘‘,;:k VI s, ��� --' '.a 1 44 / // Vt i -�f 1 L- 4.'�i� ��c, -7 r- ., 11 1 `43 5 45�; ;:- V ; ,j il .7 R' �'•� i 10 ,a 47 5 s > . ' ,.- - ����;� ���/�",0°III Ex. ` tdrm Sewer'; k/ �'-_--- ' __-- ;�y »V' 1`. Coxlstructed \ 5 --............-...7.7:::::.1 1 i jS \ '• /• t/1 i 1- i .Wit�l i School } t / Me h�> 7'1 rI' WI-M `!-- '/f I 1.:=- .1 L J 6 �, _f 6 2 l59sd� I' \ /I'�/' ( I%' �� ounor A / 2 -- %Y. ,2,4e..4: -:'-;;? ,,,.- " ... //(1) I A / '--- �� , f- f ' I S',,\ THOMAS/ / N 0 150 300 Seale in feet • STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENTSll Bon stroo Rosen EAGAN, MINNESOTA FIGURE 4 Anderlik 6 CLEMSON DRIVE — STREET AND UTILITY I Assoclat s CITY PROJECT No. 691 ( . 49569F06.DWG AUGUST 1995 COMM, 9569' I I I IIL i --- 022-50 Q� , // ,r , %/ .l./ /I�/ �� 19 22 `� !� 0� \�•O� .k ///// E �RA/ ` ° 21 24/ 42 ``� �,;,%�' DAKOTA Co. _ H.R.A. `'�- -' 1 s �; r Trail -�--- ._'"� --.,� 14 , 29 43 �i / '� / 025-50 ` ~- 11 ``-� 13 /r�� ��� ,// , y other. __ 12 ,!, ► 32 • / /� '' `/'Y•, ///�, .__ �.�10 ~�`-/L '1 ' / /,/, , .;/ i 9 V f/1 33 --//,„v.. PROI±V)9;12 ,..., 7 ----...., /r r • ��-�,l-����\ 4 <v,' _ ,'STREET -__�_ 6 5 �O 1� I -..36--"--- / / 377 -- 1 ; C ‘,../ ,1 �/ \r11 _ �--�� - _ I 1 i�i s~41 -- ti/' ��,�/ t'��'~y 1. "( �!- ,�`.. .___1 r 7 11 _.12_^� r 43 ~ J,t i -, is ii r ' '-`.PROPOSEv -�- � ' 45 `4' ����� 'ti' a �i r� i �,� 10 9 y t t 48 7,.-"'''' \\\ ..-.': / —..--------1—...., _ 4 �; �� .t,'i � i_-i \ CITY PARK i� \\ ��/ 4 1y WI ; �II vS. 1 '��� / ^1_ r OUTLOT A 6 % 'rf At, tti_-- '� f, r �. .� �_.._�.__.__�_.� SAS 1t t'1 ,-- TNp 2 / / `� 1� i t l 1 - N 0 100 200 IliMi Scale in rest STREET AND TRAIL IMPROVEMENTS � Bon stroo • _ _ _ Rosene ■ ri EAGAN, MINNESOTA FI And rlik & CLEMSON DRIVE STREET AND UTILITY l P. Associates CITY PROJECT No, 691 R NORTH SOUTH R 10' 40' 30' . a . Easement 14' to 26' 16' ■ M. , 14' 8' 2;�� . . 24' 14' 12' B618 CONC. CANDG L TurJn Lane Driving Lane Driving Lane - 1 10:1 TAPER TYPIAL SECTION BITUMINOUS TRAIL 1 +70 to 2+50 0+00 to 2+50 It NORTH SOUTH it 40' I 30' 10' ' Easement 3' 8' 13' 16' f 20' 10' 8' 2' B618 CONC. �. 12' •“11 8' /CANDG Parking __ Driving Lane Driving Ln Lane ' I r"_ BITUMINOUS TRAIL 5:1 TAPER BITUMINOUS TRAIL (3+00 to 5+50) 2+50 to 2+70 TYPICAL SECTION 2+50 to 9+00 It t NORTH SOUTH R. 40' 30' 30' 16' 16' 5' 8' 1 ' B618 CONC. C AND G 10:1 TAPER- 1---• \1 9+00 to 9+40 BITUMINOUS TRAIL TYPICAL SECTION 9+00 to 9+72.69 TYPICAL STREET SECTIONS 111A1 Bonestroo Rosene ---f in EAGAN, MINNESOTA FIGURE 6 Anderlik s CLEMSON DRIVE — STREET AND UTILITY IMP ci II Associates CITY PROJECT No. 691 49569F02.DWG AUGUST 1995 COMM. 495 _ " �a 022-50 Q i _ V // "� \\\ 19 2 P� G ` 004 r / 18 RAC . 21 _ ',' 15 r �� DAKOTA Co. H.R.A. -- _ � , I 29 43 `,� ,iii 025-50 .---- 11. ``� ,' 1 • �i Sanitary Sewer and ^`` `--. 12 ;' / ` 32 ��,/ /� •�\ 0cF Storm Sewer 100% �`� �a 9 11 ; 33 'mss Assessable to this parcel 7 , , .......":::::11111.'%j".4 ill /.if-..°+y , C 1 > `. MN — 44 I �! �� ° �_ _ / , 45 � 5 + ;' ,� ADD `. ,�g . ` _ - ` I1` \' -. ; r —ry I r_..i \1 CITY PARK \ti 'J \ // 4 ` 1• {� A U�j y r i •i i OUTLOT A `) — ;� �._ 4 _, _ SAS A 2 / / .."?--._,,,-",_ 4-...-.....-,•;:.:.-'-.. ...'" ---0-..-^,,, / 0 , / / r..-- �. `'� i NN N 523' LEGEND Nu I= Street and Water 'Main Assessable Footage o 100 200 NOTE: Exact footage to be Seale in feet verified with final plat. ASSESSMENTS iii Bonestroo J Rosen NI •EAGAN, MINNESOTA FIGURE 7 Anderiik 6 Associates CLEMSON DRIVE — STREET AND UTILITY IMP. CITY PROJECT No. 691 49569F07.DWG AUGUST 1995 COMM. 495 9 r'w e ,r; Vim/ ; 4 022-50 ''0;/ /;� li ._ \.(232 -. 0, ,, r7.18-rpAllo 21 42 2 .,'`�\'\ // ,4';/ DAKOTA Co. H.R.A. ~-..,, ,_1.5 16 \ I 1 r '2 14 '— 1) (�29 43' f// ;/ �/ 025-50 .....� 11 1 1 f 32 '/ '/ \ . h> /.` r/ 10 �� r r -`-_4, / // Z r,/ /� ~—. 9 C) rf I 33 �/ /i/ w/ /,,� PROPOSED ----- 7 _'-- r+ i '/• ,,;,// /,.ti- ,/-c� 4:, � STREET p ) ___6 5 ,' ; 36-f ',/r/` ;/ F�s° \\��.;// `, r i iL,��.717T(T// ./ 3 ~�! -.4.--- , ri if 37 / �? r .Ji f i t --�?v f r 40 J -�2 lS r- 1 ' _.« r 4_ ! ----..,,„/ 12 I 43 r. ..-. -t t. . / ' ti I f .r, _ ^11 r 45 , `1, "*, ) t I/ I j --.� r'r r>,rri �!I I 0 .� — , xks, 47 �� ,� �, r 1/Y ADD , 8 -__ / / / — ......... 1 \t1 \\ -fit\//// t — • 'J/ I .. It t 1 ..�' I ,C.�=.., (�--`t ,1 CITY PARK '� - \\ / 4• WI ; M�5 1 ,,, ire— I i OUTLOT A —_ 6—1 L 11�1� i'i I • N( 2 //—__� _—. `� ...1 N LEGEND 100 WATT LUMINAIRE 0 100 200 Scale in feet - • STREET LIGHTING n Bon stroo Rosene `.J EAGAN, MINNESOTA FIGURE 8 AndeNik 6 Associates CLEMSON DRIVE — STREET AND UTILITY IMP. CITY PROJECT No. 691 '49569F08.DWG AUGUST 199'5 COMM. 49569 I I i I I i Agenda Information Memo September 20, 1995 B. PROJECT 690,WALDEN HEIGHTS STORM SEWER ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: To close the public hearing and approve/deny Project 690(Walden Heights- Storm Sewer)and, if approved,authorize the preparation of detailed plans and specifications along with the acquisition of easements through condemnation, if necessary. FACTS: • In response to a petition submitted by several property owners in the Hillcrest Addition along Richard Lane, the City Council authorized the preparation of a feasibility report to identify various corrective measures to address the erosion being created by lack of storm sewer facilities across Outlot A of Walden Heights Addition. • • This feasibility report was completed and presented to the City Council on August 15 and a public hearing was scheduled for September 20 to formally present and discuss the proposed improvements. • All notices have been published in the legal newspaper and sent to all property owners proposed to be assessed as well as the original petitioners informing them of this meeting. ISSUES: • The majority,if not all, of the erosion problems is contained within Outlot A of Walden Heights Addition. Staff has met with the owners of this property who have expressed an interest in developing it and providing for continuation of the storm sewer outfall as a part of the ultimate storm sewer design system. However, with Outlot A presently being landlocked, it is dependent upon the development of the westerly adjacent property owned by the estate of John Brown. Staff has also met with the Brown estate representatives who have also expressed an interest in developing the property and providing access to Walden Heights. It is staff's best estimate that this development could likely take place during 1996. • Any interim improvements and/or temporary storm sewer installation prior to designing the final subdivision layout would very possibly have to be removed and wasted or possibly render a less efficient layout for future development. • Early acquisition of easements to accomplish this proposed project would result in additional costs beyond those estimated for construction in lieu of those easements being dedicated with the final subdivision process. ATTACHMENTS: • • Feasibility report, pages 9 V f c . .c7 city of Qa9an Report for Walden Heights Storm Sewer r. Improvements City Project No. 690 Eagan, Minnesota July 1995 File No. 49568 Bonestroo Rosene InAnd rlik & Associat s Engineers 6 Ar hit eta OFff 3t. Paul, Minnesota Bonestroo,Rosene,Anderlik and Associates,Inc.Is an Affirmative Action/Equal Opportunity .Employer Bonestroo Otto G.Bonertroo,PE. Howard Sanford,P.E, Michael C.Lynch,PE Brian K Gage,P.E. • Robert W.Rosene,P.E.• Keith A.Gordon.,P.E. James R.Maland,P.E. F.Todd Foster,P.E. Rosene Joseph C.Anderlik,P.E. Robert R.Pfefferle,P.E. Jerry D.Pertzsch,P.E. Keith R.Yapp,P.E. 11111 Marvin L Sorvala,P.E. Richard W.Foster,P.E, Scott J.Arganek,P.E. Douglas J.Benoit,P.E. Anderlii . , GlennrR.Cook,P.E. Robert C.Russek,M.A. Mark R.Rolfe,Anderson,P E. Shawn ec I C Gustafson,P E to Olivier,P1. Thomas E.Noyes,P.E. Jerry A.Bourdon,P.E. Mark A.Selp,P.E. Kent J.Wagner,P.E. Associates Robert G.Schunicht,P.E. Mark A.Hanson,P.E. Gary W.Morten,P.E. Paul G.Heuer,P.E. Susan M.Eberlin,C.P.A.• Michael T.Rautmann,P.E. Paul J.Gannon,A.I.A. John P.Gorder,P.E. Engineers &Architects •Senior Consultant Ted K.Field,P.E. Daniel J.Edgerton,P.E. Dan D.Boyum,P.E. • Thomas R.Anderson,A.I.A. A.Rick Schmidt,P1. Jeffrey J.Ehieringer,P.E. James.R.Rosenmerkel,P.E. Dale A.Grove;P.E. Joseph R.Rhein,P.E. Donald C.Burgardt,P.E. Philip J.Caswell,P.E. Lee M.Mann,P.E. Thomas A.Syfko,P.E. Mark D.Wallis,P.E. Charles A.Erickson Frederic J.Stenborg,P.E. Miles B.Jensen,P.E. Leo M.Pawelsky July 26, 19(19()5 Ismael Martinez,P.E. L Phillip Gravel,P.E. Harlan M.Olson Michael P.Rau,P.E. Karen L Wlemerl,P.E. Agnes M.Ring Thomas W.Peterson,PE. Gary D.Krlstofltz,P.E. James F.Engelhardt Honorable Mayor and Council City of Eagan • 3830 Pilot Knob Rd. Eagan,MN 55122 Re: Walden Heights Storm Sewer Project No. 690 Our File No. 49568 Dear Mayor and Council: Attached is our Report for Walden Heights Storm Sewer Improvements. The proposed improvements are presented and discussed within the report along with detailed cost estimates. We will be pleased to meet with the City Council and other interested parties to discuss this report at a mutually convenient time. Yours very truly, BONESTROO, ROSENE,ANDERLIK&ASSOCIATES, INC. /fre t,/ //a Mark A.Hanson, P.E. I hereby certify that this report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly • Registered Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Review- by: /1/4 Mark A.Hanson,P.E. ref_ ,-, Date: ,July 26. 1995 Reg.No. 14260 Department of Pu• 'c W Finance Department Date: 7?' 2335 West Highway 36 • St. Paul, MN 55113 • 612-636-4600 REPORT FOR WALDEN HEIGHTS STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENTS Project No.690 TABLE OF CONTENTS ITEM PAGE NO. LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL 1. TABLE OF CONTENTS 2. SCOPE 3. FEASIBILITY 3. DISCUSSION- STORM SEWER 3. EASEMENTS/PERMITS 4. COST ESTIMATE 5. ASSESSMENTS 5. AREA TO BE INCLUDED 5. REVENUE 6. PROJECT SCHEDULE 6. APPENDIX A-EAGAN STAFF REPORT/RESIDENT PETITION APPENDIX B -PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE APPENDIX C -PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL FIGURES 1-3 2 SCOPE • This project provides for the construction of storm sewer in an eroded area. The eroded area is located immediately west of Hillcrest Addition in Outlot A of Walden Heights 1st Addition as shown on Figure No. l located at the back of this report.. Walden Heights 1st Addition and Hillcrest Addition are located southwest of CIiff Road/Pilot Knob Road and were developed in 1983. The erosion has resulted because development has not occurred in Outlot A not allowing permanent storm sewer improvements to be constructed to prevent erosion. At the time Hillcrest Addition was approved, it was felt development downstream would occur in a timely manner. However, development has not occurred and erosion in a few areas has continued to grow causing nearby residents and City staff to become concerned. • Attached in Appendix A is a memo from Craig Knudsen (Eagan Staff)and a petition from nearby residents documenting their concerns. At this time,development proposals do not exist for this area, therefore, storm sewer improvements are proposed herein for the City's consideration. It should be noted that estimated project costs are based on visual inspection and not a detailed field survey. FEASIBILITY This project is feasible from an engineering standpoint and is in accordance with Eagan's Comprehensive Plans for storm sewer serving this area.The project, as outlined herein,can best be carried out as one contract. DISCUSSION - STORM SEWER The erosion in Outlot A of Walden Heights 1st Addition is the result of a 21" RCP storm sewer which discharges storm water from Hillcrest Addition. The storm sewer was constructed in 1983 in conjunction with Hillcrest Addition. The storm sewer accepts storm water runoff from approximately 14 acres as shown on Figure 2 located at the back of this report. The erosion has resulted due to concentrated storm water flows across steep slopes and sandy soils. The area of erosion is heavily wooded area resulting in poor conditions to develop good ground cover to prevent erosion. The eroded area exists completely within Outlot A. As noted on Figure No. 2, a small existing low area collects storm water runoff from the area of erosion along the west line of Oudot A. Although the low area which also ponds water has a natural overland drainage route from / • 3 • its northwest corner to Pond BP- 6 erosion has not occurred along the overland drainage route to Pond BP-6. The storm sewer improvements proposed herein are shown on Figure No. 3 located at the back of this report. As noted, no improvements are proposed beyond Outlot A because erosion has not occurred beyond Outlot A. The recommended improvements provide for constructing 600 lineal feet of storm sewer(18"-21")between the existing 21" RCP flared end and the low area located along the west line of Outlot A. Also included is common borrow and seeding to properly restore the area of erosion after installation of storm sewer. Access to the project will be over the existing access drive serving the lift station for Pond BP-6 and horse trail adjacent to the west line of Outlot A. The construction proposed herein provides for storm sewer within the entire area of erosion. However,in interest of saving cost and difficulty in anticipating future development, approximately • 250 lin. ft. of pipe could be eliminated. The area where pipe would be excluded an open channel including rip rap and fabric would be constructed to control storm water flow and minimize erosion. Other alternatives in lieu of open channel may include less expensive pipe materials, such as polyethylene. In addition, bends could be considered in lieu of manholes. In summary, it is recommended City Staff and the property owner of Outlot A work together to determine the most • efficient project to satisfy all concerns. EASEMENTS/PERMITS Easements are required over Outlot A in Walden Heights 1st Addition to construct the storm sewer improvements and restore the areas of erosion. The alignment is proposed over the existing area of erosion. A development concept is shown over Outlot A which was presented in:,1983. It is recommended the property owner and staff review the alignment and determine if adjustments should be made to anticipate future development. Access to construct the project is required over the unplatted property west of Walden Heights (Parcel 040-03). It is also recommended potential borrow sites be reviewed with this property owner to determined if borrow material from Parcel 040-03 can be used to properly restore the areas of erosion. Access would be provided over the existing driveway serving the lift station and horse trails adjacent to Outlot A. Permanent Temporary Outlot A-Walden Heights 1st Addition 0.4 acres Parcel 040-03 -NE'/a Section 33 0.8 acres 7.2,07- 4 COST ESTIMATES A detailed cost estimate for storm sewer is presented in Appendix B located at the back of this report. An alternate estimate is also included for 250 lineal feet of open channel (rip rap/fabric)in lieu of storm sewer pipe. Each cost is summarized below: Storm Sewer $85,520 Storm Sewer/Open Channel $77,050 The total estimated project cost for each alternative includes contingencies and indirect costs. Contingencies are estimated at 5%while indirect costs(including legal,engineering, administration and bond interest) are estimated at 30%. It is assumed all easements will be granted for no cost. ASSESSMENTS The proposed storm sewer improvement is a lateral improvement which does not warrant City participation. It is proposed that the improvements constructed be assessed completely to Outlot A Walden Heights 1st Addition. The City policy for utility assessment is that each property is responsible for the extension of utilities (sanitary sewer,water main,and storm sewer)through their property to continue lateral service to properties upstream and/or downstream. The estimated assessment is$85,520 to Outlot A Walden Heights 1st Addition which includes storm sewer pipe. In the event the property owner and City are agreeable to a less expensive project, the assessment would be based on the project constructed. • AREA TO BE INCLUDED Assessment Area Construction Area Walden Heights 1st Addition NEV Section 33 Outlot A Parcel 040-03 5 • --, i i l i l II]i 1 - REVENUE A summary of project costs and revenues is summarized below: Storm Sewer Project Cost Revenue Balance Lateral $85,520 Lateral Assessment $85,520 $85,570 $85,520 -0 PROJECT SCHEDULE Present Feasibility Report August 15, 1995 • Public Hearing September 20, 1995 Approve Plans/Specifications October 3, 1995 Award Contract November 7, 1995 Substantial Construction Completion December 22, 1995 Assessment Hearing July 1996 1st Payment Due with Real Estate Taxes May 1997 • • 6 • . • APPENDIX A r ; : PAGAN STAFF REPORT/RESIDENT PETITION itMEMO _..city of eager . - • TO: TOM COLBERT,DIRECTOR OF PUBUC WORKS .• FROM: CRAIG KNUDSEN,ENGINEERING TECHNICIAN . DATE: JUNE 6,1995 SUBJECT: HILLCREST ADDITION-EROSION PROBLEMS AS PER • NEIGHBORHOOD LETTER DATE MAY 15,1995 The City has recently received a letter from residents within the Hillcrest Addition regarding severe erosion within outlot A Walden Heights First Addition. The source of the problem Is general surface runoff and the ' primary contribution of concentrate flows from a 21 inch R.C.P storm sewer outlet which was installed to serve . Hilicrest Addition. . This storm sewer comes from Richard Lane and runs between Lots 14 and 15,Block 1 Hilicrest Addition and ' terminates at the plat boundary. The area of the storm sewer outlet is a heavily wooded part of outlot A Walden Heights 1st Addition with significant slopes which have crested a ravine washing out soh and trees. According to the plans and Development Agreement, there were no further requirements of the developer to provide storm sewer beyond this plat boundary. In other words, all improvements to this subdivision are in compliance to the plans and Development Agreement. Although a 20 foot utility easement was provided over the storm sewer,the existing topography and landscape does not allow access with the required equipment necessary for repairs. Alternate access from the west Is not accessible due to extreme slopes and lack of easements. If access were to be made available by right-of- entry agreements and a temporary construction road it would require a tremendous amount of fill and an aggressive restoration process to stabilize the site. This would not guarantee the problem would not re-occur and could only be considered a temporary solution. The City's utility department was requested to see if a maintenance solution could be possible. However,it was determined that any corrective action would be beyond the scope of the utility departments resources. Ultimately,the solution to this problem would require the extension of storm sewer from the existing termination point to Pond BP-6. This would be more feasible with the development of adjacent properties to the west. The improvement could be coordinated with future alignments and require approximately 1,200 to 1,500 L.F.of storm sewer. The elevation difference between the existing F.E.S and NWL of Pond BP-6 is approximately 62 feet. As of this date,there are no formal applications for development to the west,although,several inquires have recently been made regarding this property. Enclosed,please Ind copies of the residents letter,copies of photos,plan&profile of the existing storm sewer, and topo sh g possib alignment for storm sewer to Pond BP-6. gineering Tebhnician ' CEK/cb Enclosures: Resident Letter Copies of photos,plan&profile of storm sewer • Topo for storm sewer to Pond BP-6 q3 . I I Illii i . , r. j li\‘ 3 ; May 15, 1995 J To Eagan City Council, The intent of this letter is to seek action from the City of • Eagan regarding a significant public safety hazard as well as an environmental concern in our neighborhood. The Problem There has been massive erosion of land and the loss of at least 5 mature trees caused by runoff fron a drainage pipe located on the west side of 4800 block of Richard Lane. This runoff has caused a huge gulley. ( Photos are enclosed. ) This will .not only have a long-term environmental impact but could cause loss of a life and/or a potential lawsuit for the City of Eagan. Adults and es- pecially children are vulnerable to slipping or falling into it. Recently there were 6 children under the age of 5 playing in or around the gulley. Additionally,. this affects the value of our pro- perties both aesthetically as well as monetarily. Attempt To Resolve 'The City of Eagan Engineering Department, Craig Knutson and Mike Foertsch were contacted several times from Vay to August of 1993. Their response was that it would be checked into and reported back to us. Nothing happened. A city forester also looked at it in July of 1994. Recommendations The actions we are seeking is for the City of•Eagan to a) Immediately halt any further land erosion and the loss of trees by making the necessary alterations to this drainage system. C767 (2) • b) Fill in the area of land loss to ensure public safety and prevent long-term environmental damage. We look forward to hearing from you soon on this important matter. Sincerely, COArTAc r re R3•14 ... /, •/ 4.1171 K►cjwrd "Pe ja,.,, Mt.) 143-2.• I I (4( .4.1.44_tz, G2A-o L . , 6.) xy.74,A, carrA u , u.c • :I- _Tao:, kL,,, Zet .1 , sea P.42,tropy,\ • . / � • Ce. . 'tom Coocsur CITY C 4 xp IJi 141 • �,V •yt 1 •"I., , u. •i L e....vv..+ Lh r 4_`'f`,A-' r•Lj: k i,01.''.4••• •.% :}f. �rf I� •,r•. i . •1, f Y Y r rL' /��! '�j;„ '/ , 'WT.:. f l 1 r• / t ;. ' ...C I" • 4 I� '`'��,�'.. •61.1.• 1 .�•� .•ir •� ,fir '•1 ,,•• 1, �rC ;•%. �•• •"% �'• r ' •Vi 'ill eg ' � •s':11.r.. r •L•,}•t• 1 f fir ) 1 41 ! •' �•. �f A{ •.' I :71 �r•;i s / ,...a V : .". •.` • I j,K!j k'•�. .Sj''�'1 �'�l' of ��1;r}i:E`a 1 • �x p a�.� l:4..0-. /(1,,,� .. r Sal/ '; Ail-•(..�. j. l•�,:1 1•fi7.• ..e• ',?m 1i.,,.. •.Mry; ' Y ,�.' �'• •, ., t • .7. ",1 I/,; • r�• ' r '( Ir+ �.v,i.,/f �' , 1 ,0 t,A, !!'-• rr� •,;a t•M4'�, i .i i4.".7• rf .t \• O!w"�'J- l 7 lb.0 Ain 9 • 'j i.ui!� nt '• 4. ..:)}n .,,11 4 M, l.. 9f i. :1 •.. J1: '�i 1.1.1: ji i ';�oLI•y`Y+ja, 1'x1,:iYLkj "at,.w,'1��s'„tf"i niJ ,r' L+ 1e' _ ' • A� ///[,►f` rjl, sy'.,) !� 'Vi" /� ,T'��"i`7•4•-i ..7•-ti' 1'°Y'•'Il'<�M rt r.irl•tlif7 i• r.fT .!�• `�Y.1 ,nr e,',C i5 fdtC; ------ . . i ' '' i k,r 1..11 V.• "..-': . -erl •• t.. 1 .. .1. ....,• -Li ii ;.- . Iv I`.. ;•,•• • .q... I..:. ii .,..0 • ./# -/1-%•••• - a ••••,f4r 1.*-1 - , .'. le" 1/i e? •,••'' •• "4) •1*.4'4-iram /r" t!•14. el 1 • .1, 1 Eitf4(..,1,41, -..u, ii....- • iii _ . fc .... •.., •. .•. .•,. ,1 .. 4.14 4,..1% ;I( •a......1....h. . .-...... rt:-. .. 4" r • ql Li ...• / t, • 11..!sytt Via.1,,,,,:t I:% li...i 1. IV•lr 4 • gr' t .'f:i.'....?"141 '' ,ok... . • 41 Si#4 ;wt. • IfN • . ilv%Al) i%•:. , ••t • hi- ,"'r I / • Ai.?. - ; - we 4'.. c, ' ' ' A, '' . ''0 1.' Irv, • / st 0: •it0.. ? . .1,„,,.'• I .;• f,s 3••;•41.. 1 'el f(ff■, .. •• ' I. 'I •clin.i.i ' . -`4..k. 4•.? '.1"' '1.1 i '1,,,,- I i '0 e/ 41. . , .. tr. •• •1. "' .". F.':1. )1, • '• • ";14.:4114: • i Ok . pt •.LI- .‘ i'& 41r,t,t ...-../.....,„4.11-th• '-... Jo:.-...i: iL..v.., i ..0' . Li• - - . . tr.. • - ....At. .y.,...s. -1 Lit••.. '.1* lr 4' 1.1.,'p• • Om irs r.i ' A H.re/RA',1 • •.-1.1;11.:*:,•-linfiy.;••,:c. 9 , )...4.4..-.1:.• 99-v,...:„... " , . i ' • •11.1,9 11".01.I 4:14 4,..i ..1).;•••••tlf 4,..4%/UF:Aketai.jSril VC' ;7.1....t.04.,T,..11,1?,Fil% 1 . ... . I: C.4tF '. ..• )l. I i•I 9 • lot. 1.,J;;`,.. ' ,..d.v.lpi..., ,.....:A.,:... .-....,...- "ta..g .., ..-te 6.pli. .. r4.1,1..;,,..,.,:. • 1.••44 . i.'? r..,...;:?. • 1... i . ,... , ... .'r• ••••11rrein,•.- i e•pf '4 ..nA4 .4., •A. , .... * ;v•.. 4•At•a,-,lilt? . . ••• s 11'04 • . 1 . .•e ''7...' '''•T• *'1, _.,...7...11.2 I:4..._yir,..„...i:1‘..1. Mitfityrigi, . •.,'t ....:.t.•,..p.,,„.;r:',"..1:1 ."11::...1 ,:),'.1 7 .4 ..**X 1•.i. Ojit:41,:f - ••. rt. ,-.L.,-... .•; '•,,, 1:i.• .4. 7M4-34.0...•....•;- sr%f..-.• , ;._., -1-,t• ri.-.:,..1.:!-.4,31„ifiti.r.iy..lilt...Y",,,- • .:1.4.,..:. ,f: /11:1,, .r.•%. I.-ii. • i • '• / f ' . •'''' • •'' %.04S(a. a 4-'•• h 4 }i:.. • ••,--. vcA,,v"...444„037,..0:,q,:,...1-4.1r,,t.A.,,74-...1,/..„, iw;•..,„.14 ,..-j.,,,,jo.,,r,i 1 • At i •• i •. , •rii.ii? .' :t••. . . • 14.,, • \ • . V,•- . -•,oil, .. '1,14... •:•,'. v.yi_L.-gr•;‘,1•.! .F.4:1,:frft.J.3.•••-gek•?ir.11:rerri.„1;441. y .,s•lit. ' • ., j • . • il. 1.4 I ti ...r.l.-- • J....."-•••::."111...I 114V.5.LL'ari...p..t:IA•P..t11,1•14.11t.:11P '0.'‘.(f.:re pc , ' ml r6r.. ' : . ,4 is.titi-.i.,. ..yst.,,I1 ni.t• i , • c1,•;;.-,- , .... - P•47,-,. 1 .;..-..,i ,,y,f.._4.0.,, ,,..,.;44,,,,..,..vpv ki.l.:.•,. .... „ ml. . , .• ; ,A.,. ..,, i ' 'I • i 1;-.. . ..,, .4.p, -p.,.4.4-44trap ...1".•,•■• :7 rtp, .ft.i.y . tt, i •1,-'.--1;r•A -• ••••■ . r....1.02,1!... .0.1%W:tr. .• • • :ii• •Pt•-•t: • .'• ' • e ”1..i. •x,'.-..,IP /I • I . •:.1.t.1-41. • /. . °•• . 'AS .. 4.,Ta'frf-4 '4.•-;',11,)11.4:1r.:`. 4;•±4.• '..,. :',...41)- •':'y• -0414, - 4''.14•Ii-n.411'i 4' . •ff.W. ' . .r ( • •1 ir.1..11,tili•::04:•,:,...i..:5.it.t-,4,%Ii-,... 1.1.E.IU(ti"fixi.,1f.:11.1.,...:T,'.'4:4'..s:4:-.rtt4 .....P, Vint..),".:'.•..,ii..-A i ' I I : . IL: ' 'd . it ( itvii, ,..1. • 't * k . F‘ 47",k,:•.*..!..7;11,0..11; ...1/41gii... f...A...v .. ,,F,f;•11....4A:';,,-,4,.:''Ai..b... -'•', .. .. .,,;..',..fwo ,•,4.4...:.‘".. ,., T..A i, '.1.-!'.7itt 't.F.9:r4,11:',.4.'.:•:Mt?,41+:4C1,"i.V.;. ;■,,•14;11".-;:t"1„..!!•.Otti5.N69. 14 e• ,,•4."40;L:legfi....,„iiiit..44: .,, .4...it,AN .14 „iii ". '-ar, ''":t7"•elf‘1.4r,- %Writ'."'-1, ,:-.1t-A. .":.•''''?\NM i!-ity,ri. ar4:!#t: IP'-‘ ,,..,''...-ait'ifi;•414c,,..7.;',1',V4•#- ..;aldif 1•X_,.1-'6;t ea I; liq't '•1‘4 7% .,,t....„,'1011,,T• :,....tit; IR, •;....,e.,,. ...71,.,, i.„ ..,.,...„,i.f.x.A.4-. . 1...,,s,,,,.• ..:•v,,I,,.41 •,,.,.!.,;.4,,.-..:.i.t. '• - I 1 ': .. ' .',•,., .,.. if...11..2., 42,14.71.: ''r.l'IPtr..$41 'Ff:',1'4:11 . '-•ItPr. 1,AP 44Vri ITA 01.4 l''%.41..c.L7f.lifilealiir*Off'!.?;{ .1 1414,1P: . `Jk • • '." . • ...•JtiNtr'2,1 ft.':.' fi. 14,i1iCit.qia. :il ,•-.4T,l'.'..; -€. :et:', :.t.V.tiptily •• Nil:1(4a , .,Fairel.AreATO:4i _.'. ..,.• .V. .4, _*; . 1t7f.k.41114....kl)ei'e",„.-1103V4/.1.1, Fik I\ist .1 .„."■44,E ''.14*,.'3 10" .4. 4417'1'g...1J.' '•.,-1!:i A ....F:Wr. :1 .. 44-1)..711. No. ..'.■ -IV A.1;11'Jft.i•a1414"e1111.4‘rs's, ‘'. ;'td;I Ft". . '111.7•6*-VA"ifill4allirtP4 );Ilit;I' tre• • *.q,---Iiio "*.i -••;;Ili_ '` -.411,Lcis,.r.• •,•'.:1 t /.-1.,....,,,„J P...A. -• A... Itile` 2 . ‘t;I:F.'". ..q'f-4141.....1.1. _t•t•O!r..• "741:1?..;44%-ttlq'.:'6,..i•IV.0"-t4-1;'',141'..1.- 's -11--4.17114.01VA.'1;:( 4`4\.11.17:.iirrenirith14:14'...?‘bkl:',..13•4.le ...i i's.. '"717,:b.k:•11'.;•'•11---F.. gar.t:'4:01 •e. ;-.!•01444-6•01- ,.•-:•,•44 ••••••,-Iiietitro'lte.,-4,14.1,,,,, ).• 'icizto•-li--4•Lit,-fg-:•.‘••,'516 07 -•L'e.sit'.71-4',':';',?I'ji.1 .. ,1•••••'• 4.:;.V,ibt.!....,vr)I. .4:4 S' NJ244.•Z rt.'v•sj,;?..if,••1..7,1:14; „ziloia,itiF.,.•.1,•,:,;,;.7.4•4:4.5--.?..kr-f,•. •• ,'..!4;:F.D:„1 4.,•:•;L:,...-k-4:7,,114,1:4"..1r13,,:f.f:.- .) 4 INI.,if .*•!' ...in 1 ... Ti'll7,1? D„I...;.-11/22. ,-...1......e,dr 41.7.-i7-...„:',..f:-.; !..3.4t,, •...,711,.;',"befi'll. 1,01r.:ittylprt . .111.1,; T•i;k11,7,Eatirf,iy. ..1.:.„719/'i-,-,L-4.:;:gt 4,,..fili•;:.•:%1...0 L% •:•.A.ti 4.. . fj-■ -1 j'er cit.7,rilit..;4v 4.4./.1.14;'.,_-..0' .r. .aldt..:11,144_0...s; .,-,c.1t,,,vv.svp,44;,:-.4.,..1.1.14 si......-....1,,T 1,r.t,._•---.a...k.,1....- -t.ardr .'1.-Mogi. ra- ill •.„,l. '...k......- . 4-,,i-:"';4-'''..f.■'-.).l.i,6,,,V•pi., ...', •::....4 -We?'',4-4rjr...44-..i.4.F.I're . -Vi:4111/r•-•71 i,kr••if I.T, c -1..• •••1%,;--X •tii Iv tee.-11.-.to•-' fl.t•11.,.•-,'•-•-•. ..i."'.‘ cJ‘ti...•*'' •liWlv:11 It"--••--7-4-,-=-•_. 4.-• ••41;:•"•.. „•;'4411, ■Iferi•ir''k,,441-15,,,f(,•••414cAttse;:tir.'Nfi.;.".1-4.''..0tAA'A 10.0 ti,;;;,.....„-flo i,7,4_,., ;.,„ •• vil••••/„.,.....,.....1v,„,...4-•.,...,,,,.?.c.1,... ..4: .-,,1/2,..,..:•:,. .; .,:,, - porAti,„vs ,,,p,,•_3:-...?„,-,••,0.4...1:7-__.,,-":14,:tipe.::,..?..7t,3 '7;174,4,Ni:4.114;r•,......A... ,,, ,..,.,-,,,,,,.„. ...,..?, ;.s.,..„,,,.„,;....:.,,,,,,,,,f..x,•,-4•.,..1/2,-:(::- , ,:.„„ .• ..,-.,.. ,,, .1/2.......-::.,• .„...,-,,...,...i. •,,,.._. .....„.„.: .m.,.....„..,,..t.„,,..,1„ :. . ...„...ii.,,,„:•„0.,..„,-it.,17.,-y9";if;....,..m,::::,.;...y.....s.c...,,,,..1....,...,-.14:r...4-. .;-...,.,--i!.7..„. ..1.•-.H.v.'i,..1' 10 ....li ,s,,0,1;,.. ...,1r,„..,..51.i,234 , ....:• pAvv.z- ip.i.,:rit.....1,7.31J0.10„:„.ir4eio,1.....,..w1„....14::;qzive.t•iii....4.4:,..„,_;.,:.:. „, .I: • a • ,...\'.:”.',......i.c.:•-ii. -it-. I /Mti-..51:1,ktraP.,'.".1a.:.:W4y, •i-; • r ie.e,pckiNrr.4114747. 11.,..:1,3v.:.1,.. -.i„•,...z.4„..:...ik,...!.. i....,.,•,.1.',./..-..,...,:-3.1.tei::1'... •it., - . Air.. '•''''• 7•:,1'4eidt., .'"T'• :"..ilt.i.- --.?!..1.'.,...'-'144;iit.T....-‘4.6.4-...0...Sr."' • -.1i...0 ,....-4.1. .L:"..3:-....:- :-,,: t•i!!!'•:;:-.1.I rt't, ••It.V.:A ' ••••••41:.••:':;.;•,..t•.5.1:-...-::-...:•tv•-ii .4Lftiv I A, 2 i ••.;?!it•IN '';WV/,- .ri. ,1111.!.°P - •::•,. 1...!•-,..,111/4,.7•4•'&_r.:4,?4.4V-Vii 44'4/ ' /1141 V;W!•*'"" •iieF13.frY4....•AS'..thi '''.L1.57•••t,7-1,•-•10:41-4N,..- i.-11.ii!N 4::%.1i'i..'1, If . ''''X.r•-i ,•,...; : ',....5..•,; ••••••-It'- ,tit'S,0;;;.`;1 . ..L.-11 '.'',1i,k7.1ki-116t; '.f '-Ail, .Rt.,-, •i;-J.1-.4•1••.,. - 4.4...-.:11,•;!:C4•11::"...•,:t;t•Rlici:140:,.:...41:.:11. sr•_,,.• • *.. ;Va....lel 1:11'...MH1i.-17.'14 :3.''''.4 r: 7. f"4, -4,!,et,.7:7-;,■.74-14:2.;,..• 1,,',.',-.-1,:Al f',-4.-!..•21Wit.Z. 'N.-.. - 'Pr 4:02 ,.... .;P.Arv,--44-,-•'''-`,...,..'.'1,-' -''.*4•4* •'.ifh•t-.--4; ---'FIN:4 .., ,:zrf ...044isp-4.-la I'. -:(.. '..--'; ""- ■••• •••• 44: . ".--1 ."' 1 ,'.....• 0.',.•■■•11.4.'!1 . I '0;; *xl•ri%6•::•••1•41.A.1- . .... 4. I... .,..._'Nt....:.v...10.,...,.‘!;•,ii.f...,"-,2....i.„ „..--,,.........-,k._•..1.144tel 414-1,,..10Aidl.. .44.4.4t"-.40.0"18:. I .••• ... • ,.- i . . , • . ....:{".•..: 1T,51g••••;:"-••••o..r•A,....;•■..1.11-;*n'f."."3- .._`• %,. ::I..';I.,. 11,14L-.7•-7,-t.„1.'w1r....t:.•1;;.74„,...11:1,.._leo` t• ...i,•••ristj'ar4tWF !''-..•1•41:411i...iig PIP:ilint'- . 1H. 7 , _... .... ' .. ';•:*-7 .,"11••,•-" • '`'•••••44114/1•1411;H•li:?•!;),t1 • '''.1- Arb•-twv..1,4 Co:-,...%,........1 ...■:.;:t• ,... , I • .1..4: ..ict. .,, lk ...00 .s.A.,,,A. ,. - • "-Y 1" ` '•At• •411.. -...441. .i.. .1 l'...•... .,L..••■•03.4141 : -r-I ...44,40 4. ' , P" '.A. 1 .' - ' -'s w`.1. •'.1•.:-. ;!,3r1 44.1 V%i.1 • ' ••44ttil'tly',11-.:7'OA 1,1TA:t••10.',•.;11.111.',%-it illettl. •ItiVt,ilv •*•,-...4410.,-••W•,--. fvf..i 1:-,,,„f1;,,...- „,,A.1; •• .f.:-1••••• • Li-iii• ' ...4•Vei :•:••,...4_ .y., • 41, Pslk 1...M. ‘1,X9,14•••-1 • • • - tit ...,:iii..%:tibir •,,A•:.',Ii-eci,•4:4.4kidMafTltraVO•04.1#--•'•••• ..).• el,rt.A. 4' •.,A,1t, .14, ..k.•I+1,,`,&,__A•••• :. i.4•14.7:. ,.•"' • , •"13.1.t.. .;. • `i.: ri,.. ' ,..-. •,-6••.;1 '1,14: ? ,ar:_rz/il t?.• ••••■.!..,L..V.I. " .• -..1.'4 "la k,'I:. ‘‘.13■0.ior'141W5 4'1'. . ..-lik•. i ; '77- ' m•,c7ito --;:l.. - ,----,ir.o., -...v.-.t.. ‘, 4.2,., ... • ;„-44:- *%, ..;,,,. .,• .. , .t4:1•41 •;:t•-* ...T041.;(1:-.. : ?I/tic:1:17..;:jkls"?..'f.1/1: '' ..‘•k : - '‘.1.410' .. 41,12,14.)1T-141„..kr%. naC. ....%.,...`1‘11 . .., 4,5:...).: ;Ism. - . -.I.-A-A.1,e, • La. 14 ,, ,1 -4, . :ir • ,. • , sei.,.- • ...;.1,4.;•,.... .....„:.q..1.- - . . . :., , . IL; ,,... .,t,_. ...4. ... ••1511:16ta:..-f•if"•,...... / • !Yrigl.... I. n•• • ••■ •••0 i' W4 •.. r 7041 ■ 47fr 04 '.......Pt . • . m•.'•.• '.. .i witoi..4' - ,• my . t. - t..,,, ■• ' 's •41-41 N.A.& ,........`. '..71/,...10.1':' •■••1 •.142:4 %; 'L'71r••.'• •ir" •)loopier'..016-7,V01.,;..k-ZiP1'4'.119:1,•:- i f.• ••--1-_,A ' ' , 0 , 4.PirroWt .4 . '' •Alk,4e.t‘i '4:•'6 it ' •I• -AbtAr7 -' ,.... •11;,44 ;.4.,f AA 4 lb.arum. ; ' --'...**C*. I'"....iit 1.1:'41111V 4.11•I'L.:4r: J 11111W- / t• . .•••^ • •," ..."46-4,11. ;fa es: :. a . . ..w ,'. • 4'• ..• - • 4.4,4 .; ,.....- r".11.1 ''..-- "14);"...14. . • \ .2.....' ., . ,..... . .:1-..,..7.1.- N.. I- •I • . .4 .0...:. ,.. (trting?!.:74; ...4.44'. 1k.. .." '''.1 ' • .0 •/, ..3 7' , .,•'v.. . .,:... to.;It;: 1 .:1!;' . -"MI .I : • .. .. . .' . . * a •h •• . • "•4,..''......"4 ,1*'1_1.4' r• •.1144•171!.• . .•F• ,,. II .. . .... .II . •at • ,.14 •4, . 41, „...j..,1 -_.A, • .. . . • .a.•• ......7.re-rf.„..:,•-• .. 1.: ..,."3..-...r. •.,%. .,... ;;;...0‘,..• ,,..... , .. ',-.•.).t.-.••4,-' :- ,.,...P.. I t P •••• . „„K•Ti • ' ....,:fte,x14,....:,31c.gor ., . . ac •• 4 • ... 1.._ • ....'- ':•,..qa.--•"' - - if' •vaiCPP:: ' ri I t■ " ; P. ''.....*■C..jtair4.7.:2.• • * .. '• .1,4 , ,,, • • .j..1.e.4 A.. .;,..74.1,::::(":,-- 1; ..;. ... 1,, ...1th •*;•!,'4• ".,..,•:-.. .i.: ...44:. ..41F-, .•'k'''' •-. -. :"• .'4.14 14''-‘4., ,4,..1.1.•;;;.••,:i1,;.;,•4,-,1_74.12, ....7;....,,j4g,,,I,..i.f.,....ii4,-1,4441#14 rA 1, .i.,!...; -.• ,:..-ireAmisit.$._ ,"4-- .„:.4..;•..rP:A..77;.f. .1 %.;ail ,,,, ..7•41.: • 1 '1..W.Y11!r•-.14`...-4 ..A.: # ' •bk.,'iv'.-.;44-ir..-1"..:2.. . --, •.--.. ..,_.-4..., L_.,1,--••=r;:.,'.#4::;';;,.';',14, '.: '-•,i, 'Y A't •A let.-4•140, WI if- ,1 '.. '' 1 .4.7.2 .- 44.4- trgy .'y',I• ...Its , r tmlif.101%-. : ... if.41517f.VL-14101-ijil0f41,1:1?4;1.10,,W•:iiik...' i •11,4i 7.p•.• . ..:4 ••,.r.l'-64-1 1•. .. . • sa •.. ,vit,V4....1. •• 7brz •4.,:!..ix..41.41,4. . P.;; I• .)1-,..,!.,•;-.r.k.:.,,,..,...44.1:,,, •i;...1 . 41•::,.'t'''',;',• 14 0." • •. 11.,:ii,•,..%.-, •ei9.4;,,II„lic,.. • •, , 31.114:,IV •,,. ,-.4 I 71r„ 71..1,„ 7).`,41.4:. ' • ' ., . , ..tt to...4.., .1 V.14, .; .1,1 ..,‘,;:f....7 ..... 2,;.••■•■•t.lr.1.4..6.iiiiii•LH.,i.:::•`... ;••••••• If::„4 A.4.•.:4•••x•rrtv,,,,•A.7i,r4;•„1,:.:.,,‘:....,:. i.,,, v . ..N.1- it Pi%NZ„Nit,. r".'7f. , "1..-:.:1ttLfre le.re: 41.??.r.■'14 tit.'447 7 fit •, •4, 4 ity',, ,-.„1 . •%- •. " i 4;4.. ; t ' ,.. ...I.•ti;4/.4....ii,.. •. .. ..:Jr.: e 4. 4 ',.. A . ;It .:44'...,,'•ii.S- '.:',4), Ja.....;• 11..,.!Sit 1,.;,- 1.12 Ili t 1.,,,.3...:,..;•„;/.., ,,, it• ,,. , • ' i ,!,. .. ,'.„ - v.:. •7si-lt:JiJai.:1, ''-'4••:..''Ll-ai'litl•? • rit iq 1,:i, ,,,NPu.If .' !1•41 .!,, .:4- ., ..r; ,,. • ..,, . .."".•1 ,‘ .:-,V;1,, ,,i,...iIiil..,°.,.•:t-t,p• •••:. •iiii...._; 077.i. :',105...,,:rWre:POPAI:4:,,.!‘•,11•If t,rect• •,:.,, \ v....T.• ,,A7 •,.• ..4.- .. -.„,r, .i,i .•- . • ltele44 2, . . :11. ‘.• ..T..:•. ", . •)44ht.,_t '4,- , .1:4*...k:kr1:4;/P*1734-A ir''"-r- •17r.' '.1 • .1.in '''.*._;! ,,,_ It 3*. \4.1.iiic2 '-:ile 7-et . „.I 3k1C*4-.4 .---"I 7f..::..a..:1:1-11V:9,: dirfN 4‘.71Y-IN, 51. 1- ' . TC.: ■•i' ',7-■•••:\ .. .11....;4' '' .%,.keim- . •-. ... ' • •1...› ...kA ''''•-I ,-,. .•,ag,';44.:,-: ir f:1, /1•.1.-T l'•''•••• ._ 'IN,.. . 4.,,k..t, p„,4y.c1 ••„. ,I.,.; . e• - .1 . . A*.iw's .../1_,L yi.; ii.j.liarWKIILL-6.141f. C._;', ; qlt ,',k-,,, ' 9itte -, ft 'Z •s . .rt`•••-•:01 '1.1 -:.• .41r.: !,--.7•1 'ANIXtrr--2q.1.t" '; ;r^.7,*-; .!•1;e'.. •0‘. v.if4 44\ • [ 1"-.:. -:......„.. 1 x.'..+.V.'. ....• --:S;5°•:■,ii..••Iii+\•' 4•11M.A1P4'1•• 1 s ii f ••••%41)1•■• • ••••■•-..?•i•V*4 ' .. 1. 74 cm,.Ike°•••ff ,;.si.... -,It,rli ...01. ..z.atic .T. le-. • t..i. ,-,- .. .t..,.,4.... gorii• ... : - ' ' s'`‘'''' ' '''. .-"--4b. ''''•it. • , --a...4.,v,i,titP . ...• , 6,,s..„,,,„ , .,, , .4, 1,L . . • ..)...-.1. .r....-,.. iv-.., • • • ,... , 1. 1 r..... '• 44...1,4elt, .4' 4' 40 ': - 711. riI4:.4E:IL) .il. '7;' 1414. ' • X . •••••• ..11. .• 111:v■•• '• : elk ef,.. .-.............wr •- .--1. 7 ._ni irrayfr. 4?0 " 16:e.ifir'16.1111S. . • 1. :%.-.1 . vtlritr• ..„ 1‘14.;.:**4 . -1% . . ..410 ..'_'7' ..:.':L. ...i. it.'. .0E- i p' " 4"3,4,C;;Iiii* • . •• • • i71%,:•'..'.. 144 .4.. •• ' ,':r-'46:irit-l'&_2.'•'54" 1 ttis- •- ,r4'+....4. 3i;VP.. .",,', -••• .,, . -1/4,%,, L.. ...+.4„ ..•14:., .:4.41..-• .rt N„,11.,..4t.k. J!:.;.-1 -, .-':■-'. --v ta -47.,..i.r.' a li.ii' '47 T., ' •ti. -• :yr,* • A ••if ' 'w•^1... :tir 1'.% ei7.Q.. .. 1.71.'ts... I • AN o ..• .44- A •,_. • , , - -.,Ii•%...• •• 1.• i h. • it.:g:f. V%Zt'dn!•:.11,Riicrir,•Q, 40.•IIT,,,j • ...: .. .• ..k.s.■ .711 . ,,... ibiik ft,...-..,•....!•.;.:,..,, •cS••,••e..0al,-z10e..".11.6. •:..... t.%•P4h.-. '-t•'-•,/,' k 1. •°.r '• •• 6 1 4011.0r,... ... . "4 * 44 I • . ' f,-i A 4 • .....-L.:-..... ..: • q (.... . • I I I II 1 1 ........ vt. • ••' •. „ 11 i ' : ' t : 1 ; 11: • • : W ig. :? +: . - .....; OD16 „ N ‘ s•-• . 1- li : f 1 . : , . : : • I ! . • • V • 1- W ' • f i • . ..; , . 1 flll 111 : 1 : 11 : Iii• I fii • . . . -: I . , i . . • 6 .•.: , . '.:1: • ` : Into t • 12i • : ; 1 ' • • • . : ! t , ttitt • • : t : ,• • • • • . • •, 1 • : : : : • . : : . .. i1 111 ' 1 : I : I " . ; ! ; 1 iii ' lg ...t - i •••i i ' •.• i-I ; :*• $. ' • • • - ' ; s • 1 III :. Ii II ' • 11t. . _, .. i . :. re") . . • c: • :. • : . • tt , ,, ,, II ; , • t : . : 2 • ; ' !. 't••• ;" i i 1 ! I i i 1 1 1 1 1 ! i I : : I i : . 1 • : : : ! 1 1 • t . • . . ' • ! • 1 : i • • II . ' • . l';:•- :: ,..i.- • : . .: I.; • • -, : ; • ..., . . , • i - . .4: : . • ; i • 11 : s [ 1 : ! ! : I 11 ! . ; i . , II' I • • : • • ' • ••• ' ••• ••. ; WI : 11111 ' 1 11ill ! ! ' '• 111 : 1 • ' ' - I : • iIi . ' ea : , , . 1 • ' i i .' : • i 3 . . : 41. ! it .. •• ; : •. I • • •1 °4 . >: : Hill 1 1111t 11 111111111 " 11111 • , ! •• I ', ..; t : 1 • • : • . • 000: 1 . • • 1a1 (1.: . ., 1 , WI 11 ; 11, 1 I i Iiiii : 111 41 ! : 111 : : . : :•;•.I.41.• .1 I). : . 7,4 • . :. . ., . ,. , . : • : 1 ; i ititi : . i 111 ,•: • 1 •1 ! ibi•66'6: • u) a, t : i s ; i il , 1 . 1 * , 1 • : . 1 . 1 . . 4 • tl - • • •••4 .., Iii ! : • • • ia/ •• • • ii . 1 • I 1 1 • • • 1 • ' ' I I : • iti. i ' ll ' il I iiiii. j : II Iilliiill iiill . th+ • 2 : 1 ' ! I : : 1 : : • 4 ! : f 1 1 t ' • • 1 ! . . 11111 1 ! 11 : ' ' 1 i. 11111. 1 : 1 1111i : 1 ; • • I .. I . ' -- • • -, • ' • I lii' . : 11 , I. ii ; i1• • •. : : Hi - ii- '.: , . 1. „" : • : . : . . -• • • 1 . . . . ' ' I il ! IjI111 1 III , II IlliIII : 1 : 11 ; ! i ' • " .. .. 1 -• • • •• •• :•• • • • • : " - • IiiiIII iii : : : . ; . I1 . 11i : • ..• i .. •. :.'•; ; ; • :• • t • ... . • iiii : : 11• I I. IIII II. WWI : ii : IL i : •. 0%..., ..- . : ! • , , , , , ! ii . ; , 1 iii•f I I : 3 • ' Ii • • • • 0 : : ; 1 • 1 ' lie " I 'l iiIiiii • I ' • 11. 4 ; ••:-.. i ` ; :', ; . 4 . . : ! ! : . . • -.• . ! . ii . II ; i : : IL. I . , i , • •• 1 ,•• • : : : , - 1. • ; I . 1 • 04 . • ! : : ! • • 1 : : 1 : : 1 tliill : : it • : : 1 . ; 1 ,.a . . . : ; ; ' . " ! • ' •• . . .: 0 : • ; : • I 1 1. l • I 1 ! It I 1 1 1 i : ; i i 1 1 l• ! I i : ' • ,-, • - • , ... \ . . - ! . I ,^, .: •• s•• I 1.s : ; .1 !.; : ; 1.:' 'y ; i..1 • WI . • i • i I • •!. IT . i '.•is i 1 •i 1 1 ! ; 1 1 : I 1 1 1 1 i 1 1 i : i I i I 1 ' II i .• 1 .4 .. i*;••••i i'i ■ : • : if : i • Xi :. . i ;• 41.r ., : i „:5 '. ! ! , '. 1 1.1 .. ., ! ! ! ' l, i1111 ! . ! 11Hilil . , •.: .4, i. ... ...t • ! •••• : • 4 1 ••• •1- i ' el a • ,, . . ; . • . Thilf ■ sl . : • ! I . ' itif ' • 1 - ' f ti • I • i •/".. . :" . •.:1 .I, ';' % • ' • . : • • • .' •to : : ! ei ; t • ' i •be, ' i , • 1 ; ' ! ! . i f ' W . : : . . • it • t ••% • , : . • •: ‘ , I • t : , : • ' • , ,. , , • • ! ..lut i If ii , : .• i,:::".• ! : „ :...: '.;,..•',• •• ., . : • . • .)_, • • ; i-o• • i • I ' ; '• : : : I t:I -. 4 .. . 1 1.• . • • I . ‘• • .4 • • . ' Ilj... . . T ••, ; CrIVr• • • I I 1 • ' ; 14 • I • • I. '-• : . : . • : 11 .' 1. il. .. .. • , • I . : 1 . I >CCI I III • 4 ' : ! IgIi : . : • • `.I :,. ■ ..; : I.. • • . . ',..t . • ; • : % •i.,! .• ;• '. .1. i. 1 !I). ; : • :. • i Z4I I 11111 ! . .11 ' , I i I • . ! . : ,•SI. • ;• . 1. • • ! . .'• i :•i : • : I 'N : HI . • 4;(0 . ! i4* 1 .7iLii I ; 11 • • 1 •1ii , • iliIIH : ... .. • • . I - C.00 ..• ' ' '' • 1 ..j•••Ji ! Ii il ! Hill ' • ?: i . i : i . . 1 ' • •• . IIiii.• •• : ..! • : ii .. . . .. f : ; •. 1 . i i... ‘ i : ....jU: 1 : i t • .• . : .4 . " . t • I " Z • I • • • ' • :\ i 1 ••%! '.;• 1 .... t ! • 1 IiiIIII ' l • • . • ! I . . ' . ;. •.1., itt•'.- , , . •, '. .. . t. ' • • • ; 1 : , . ,r, • ••• . 14;••••,. , • : • , t , i , t - t • ti • • • : , • • •I I : • • ; : • t : : • • • • t , • ; • • lift :P.. : : , ' t . ' Li " : t i : t I , ' t • ,s, • -, • • • ,;•••• ••• ' . • :- - •- .:1,:'.1.i. .;•,1 !..1.41 a .: : I.! i. .. .1..•••••;::•! • 1 ; 1. : • ' t'r: ' i 1 1 .• . in •I ' lli I • 91"0 16.96 C Iti tits! it • . \.,, , , , II , ' 4 " . ..• i•1"; I••1 1 ; 1.1..•; , •e..1 •• ; • i• • . • 1 : 1 i • . • . 1 i , er iiiHI. :i zrtee.z96 •.,.i .. i.1.1 •i •-•:. ' ! •••• ! • •• : , Lk' • i : • ' I *.tf),,f 1 • ' • ' ! ' • 1 , I ' i : 4,141..-100 Z9:6 • $....-1.:•4 i ' t '''' • • '' • ' • ' : • • cb "--i• In' : , cl..! • - ' : ' ! t ' ! illi ' l . . . - - 4.1 • i', 1 t'' r *I* . . i . • 41. .ii - .1 . Ii . . , I i • i1 ; 9L + , ... • ....1 • , 1 girl • .1: : ' • • : ; . , • tit • • ••! • . 114 : ' -•. ••'• '. .. .. f ) ;.1 • ,•-• , • • • : . ; III • • • Iii ; : : . i_ : I • : • •• _ . •m ert • • ( , • - • : . , • '.1 : = : . , • 1..! : . • • . . •• 1 Pli• I i il ••,,f1I-re) • j. . 1 i . : ' .: i • : 1 saRs LI, ! I : 1•41 I .1.1-.:,•! .r. ', I • • --. •• . , • ' kli;.1 1 • LJO • " ! •• i : 1 ; K : ; : , . : !c••••it..1 I. ii ‘ i • .. • ••1..0.; ' e I 1,,....,• •...., t.: *.,r •.: t : ': : u„T : t 1... .: • • • ; v 1 ,. : • ; .13011 i I i ! :: ,. . ! 1 ... • ; ., : - •:- ti ; :A:, .•••' 4 • ,.. .: •• , 2 ; t 141 I it....1.1•.. .1 ) 1•.••4 !.i 1..: .. ...-• ':. ill= 1. • I : 1 i . • • • Ni 1 '. : . • ce:Oi I 1 . , : : • I 1 , :. , ,. 1 .1 ; it . • g i • 11 . 1 : . i'-'• *::•L'i i i ,-; .*:i. :••• '. l: .,:".* ::'• ' : L_LIJ (...)2' • i !•1 ' ' '1 1 A, , . ir-III HIV: i : ' : : : • Ii ' i t•.:•• l'I....1:111.;•:•-11 • ; • ! ,• .-4••i .' 1 ;•11-- I ; II1 ' „ ICJIIi ; 1 • Ift • : , - ,,, 4..,:: ,_ 1,' •_.• :• : ..• :_, : : 14 : I 0 _.-.1Z • / I • • • 'el i , I : ; ' , 1 . 1 I i. ' • 11,11,1• 1 -11r.11 10. i.1i1 .1. .41, 1Z. ,,CP. ; • 131 : 11111 IiIIIN •• rt..1J,11111111 : 111 ! " : 1 ; ii! ,:r. 1. 41 .1.1 ..;. • . ,,11. 11 . 1. cf111111 , ii. i . • 1 , ! , , , 1,1 ,4.,. . ic.00, 111 . i . .. .. . .. I '..4. 1.1 t; 1 • 4 1 11 ii.: *4 1.‘ 1 I 1.111.111 ' I . : .1 i 1. 111 1 ! Hi • 1- --!--i_LI.1:411 ! I ; I 8 bi li 6 : . • ; 'i i .1 ',:'j..,...!•,:...: :1 ... i :.. : I I ... • •.:i ; ,.' . ,• : 1 ' : : , ; : •• I • I-A [4-1- . , ".' : ! . : • .. ; I '. 1l9 . 1.I•I I" *:1:.i .1:1 t'. i 'i. .: ; j•i•, 1 I . ; ifIt : 11.1 , 1itt : iti *. ; 1•Iiii"7•1,-,1 i . '. 1i1111-1-• ., „ -, it...L.L .I. • 1. I.I I I it. 1111 i• I 1 ri [H. I 11 II 1 .1 14 1 H11111 111111/1V‘i111011111 11111F.: • • •11.111. Ji' •1:1..a ! iii.: 4 , 11•11 , !•: ! ! lie if..•; 11 : : • : e1111 / i•11 i : ' I hi ! ! Iii..: Ii • . Ht.'.rif• -, ,. iiii •II•.• esi '• • i1 -let l 'I '• . - ' . 1• i • I . I .I .%1 ' ' 'i ' , , 'i , . •' i II 1 ! • i • 1111 . 1 et . • i 1 : 1111.1.1•1 / 1i ! i* C. : 111..11• , .. ' 1' iiri , 1 - 1 . : 11 , 1 ‘ III Idi : 11 ' 411 1,•:,• , 1•it ' l rl 1..ri ' l • I ! .111 .•:•.1 ., if ,: iiiii • :• • • ni , ii \NI • • •• ii : i , 1 fel : I 1 /*I.!' i ;•11‘..1.1 1.1 ., it, /, 4 , • •i• ii'fili t : . 11111 : : : : sItt ! i 1 : 1 • i ' l ! 1 ; 1'81.1' 141 : C1. 1.i i IM•Tittl ! ' ', ! ' 1 '• : • :• i : z±1 • 11 ' kali ' , IIH : t . , '• •,' I'l 1.,..1171 ,1 ! it f.,. ../ : fil hill _ itii ! ; 1.t ..-, 00)11 - , • •11,,• . 111 , . 112; : I • %AI 111-1 ,••1 1 .1 itt ` t-t 1• 1 . 1 : 1111 Jt1 , 1 ; tir t • ft 11 -.2+ 1 iti, t ,1 : r . 111 1• 1111•i1 : ! 1•4 : 1 1. -1. 11 : i. ; • ! : ! 1 • , • 11 ; i: ' td_rtugpill, [ 11.c.7c1 ,.n , ! : • I ii., 4 . iif .Hil i•iflifinji ., ! ; 11 ! ; • ! ! • n : ! . ' :.•iii.....ci ,.. ---41z51, 111 : 1 ' , ,,•' . • , i• i!,%..d : 14 !- ,Iliti.iii ••• : ; 1 ,. . 11 iii , : ii .! • : • ! !. . 1 - .. i• 1• ! iii .Hinwilli : !: iii ; . , • ..,•1.. : ii .ii ! . • I , •.I , ! , ; : , 1 ,, , • , 11 • iir-.. . ;•' '.1 ! :.f.imit : .' 11 ; t !, ! 1 : 1 : • • " 11 • .. i\ gil ! ! ! ! 1 : INP. I1 /111i. 11111 I1W, ! !" • . II , = • , . • • Liii , . ., ; , •, , . . 1 , 1 . 11 . , 11.fli • ! , 111 . 1 -: : . : : . . : -• t.., .1., , i. „ 1 to i • .; i Lilt H , , I „ ill, 1 : ! ii I 1144111111•_ 111 :.! ri . .e1 ; 11.1. : ! .. • •i ! ! •41 , '..: . ili ! ; i • Jiii I f fil ! , 11 , ! ill ! ' .; i '. : . I • : 1.4 : 1•1•• ir•I • tr , • ! ' , 1i e • :. III ! ..r ! iii ; ; l ' . . . . . ' 1 •111 : ! • I : . 1 it • i ! eis . ei , • ' • ' ' : ! : ! . 1 ' 1 I . : • !: i,s. 1 : : i • II ' : .• • ' • ! • : 41 ,__1i 17 • •., "m• . ! ' •, 1• ft ; ! 111 . : •. t1 ; 1111. 111; ! 1111 . 1t1111111 . ; I 1A...a.-• : . Ii1C11ii • • , 1 • Ii1 ; V: 4 ' ' 1 ! ii : 1 1 • Ii il.,'••0111 " : 1 ; i gr! . .. r • ' ' • • • . 1 : • • ,•: '" ii ! i • I • ! .• " Ii . . .. : i ••litli ' l : ' • . . i. 14. 1 ", ii • • - . ".• . . : ' • .• ' ,'..i _ _------- __ ---- --- __________---, - - •.----- • • • •00'19 N . .. . •. ♦ •• • • : C�• • .. Vii'.• al . •t / / • .• • • .. - 0 LA.I ., , •• 1 •• ..e 9. ..... , i . 4 ` 10:Z • ..Q �� d . . . •X(/)I—• •• 3 .••• • ON •. • 2„i• +,. OM1. • ', j;••./ •`” •• •y:•• .: •`•: -••••.• . . W y+. .. f y .'' �'. L CO R• Imo! . ... •� 'y' ',�' •.'' ,•..• in Li.< Fes- +Q.�'' �� " • : ��: N • Q W r 3` • l • •.., •b• • N.� '• ••` � • •• • — C •• » I ;•� •• , • Ed • • ; • • (I' p • • • • • ,•• • • -- . . 1 1 I - • • 's' 4" • .f rt. •.�•.•' `�r�iai•q•( /.`. 1. y ••' .•A• ,•;,1• �f 1 etc/vb. ,;.,.......:.4.. '•:• � � • - >". ;4,/J✓r''. • •••2�.�hy�: )ib +A..t,•47 •!/y"•m: '1•' '{6) • , 315 ••; ,1• A•.:• • 4: .....:• .'•'/' •• ,r� ^ .`..'""l.3•.•••A.!11:, ..Z1'.10 y 'tn Y i y y:' .• .7.►q Herr. Jo. r� ,•� 11;:i• "1 •;4,'.• I-' . . %-•___-•.r -- -r _ ^..!': ...`1'�� a. ,,• .r'i!'f1 •1I;; •�.:,y `� .. 4% N ��i,lesrL'n�;d;e�d ~si.av- V►;F ". .7'qs' .• '.r..13. . �" ,G! 1 avr� , .!b�'+; •,., Ira ,, •- �� ..i_:.� ': '- .y ..'�.. ;y// .,•• /.:• 1 I•,;•.:k: �-,- . •�1 ,.I :t' * ..- �,•r.. 7_..>+ ryr�I.. ///j/ .1.. 1 f /1111 �• / �1 1.A 4\j` .�1. Ii ` - r �.�'��, t_"ter' i'!E " �/ / 11 1/J f .' 1 '1:� . '•s:t1 _ r ;-���i� ..� TC a _"/ 'r' � �'.y.� :•��''�''' '1�'i✓/ ev.\ flf�\111\\ ft, J•l• �s�e '`r▪' - .........."..••••, �"~a ^+��: �r�'�'0.....,...........••_ -r,...-70%.„u,-.....01.•.....•' ..4a """.... .:•;. r✓ i •1111IJ,tiI;' 1;�\;• /e• x:F. rrr-_.1�, �___.▪ _y ��`,• "+1.�..•,r r/,. - .` •• 111111 I I I \\ \ ,/. • ;\ti _ f_' rrr.fti.+ .. •.•••�S. : ...•••.. ••--r.0�� ./ •^ •i /Illli�`l' I 1\\ \• .�i. rr���-. ▪ r rr it • ►err'. r /ir. `/�f rr� • I • \••::/re•'i' ..r r rarC_-j ,..r~ �. r r r.. �. •:� 44;./. //Il4. 1 \ ;\ I. f. •.•„.!; '••-•• r :9•1�r..O •!• �•.'.' ►.r%r �:r.'i'r�'SOr Ti." .1;44i 1.%A.\\ \\\♦�•'.. %si . r. / •j r - r M,r 'r' ••••••••...1.•`"• i //111• \\h \ \ \r•...r. ~� 1r. .„....,;,•' '.'4•, ' `-yam I. , L•r \ 1 •�:/ ./,�!r� T+'/ -am.--"���_��"_ 0 b.: -. •.11\. ,\y`\-,�` ./ . S. -.«.1 •�� V v '1' ,/ r �: • APPENDIX B PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE WALDEN HEIGHTS STORM SEWER Project No.690 Al Storm Sewer 1 LS Mobilization @ $5,000/Is $5,000 450 LF 21" RCP storm sewer @ $45.00/if 20,250 150 LF 15" RCP storm,sewer @ $40.00/1f 6,000 4 EA Std. M1H w/cstg. @ $1,600/ea 6,400 1 EA Remove/reconstruct ex. 21" apron @ $500/ea 500 10 CY Rip rap/fabric @ $60.00/cy 600 1 LS Clear 8c grub trees @ $5,000/1s 5,000 2,200 CY Common borrow (on-site) @ $6.00/cy 13,200 120 CY Topsoil borrow @ $10.00/cy 1,200 30 AC Seed w/mulch, fertilizer @ $1,500.00/ac 4.500 Subtotal $62,650 +5;% Contingency 3.130 Subtotal $65,780 +30% Indirect Cost 19.740 Total Storm Sewer • • . $85,520 496.Tt c�3 B) Storm Sewer/Open Channel 1 LS Mobilization @ $5,000/1s $5,000 250 LF 21"RCP storm sewer @ $45.00/1f 11,250 100 LF 18" RCP storm sewer @ $40.00/If 4,000 2 EA Std. MH w/cstg. @ $1,600/ea 3,200 1 EA Remove/reconstruct ex. 21" apron @ $500.00/ea 500 2 EA • 18" RCP apron @ $700.00/ea 1,400 130 CY Rip rap/fabric @ $60.00/cy 7,800 1 IS Clear&grub trees @ $5,000.00/if 5,000 2,100 CY Common borrow (on-site) @ $6.00/cy 12,600 120 CY Topsoil borrow @ $10.00/cy 1,200 3.0 AC Seed w/mulch &fertilizer @ $1,500.00/ac 4.500 Subtotal $56,450 +5% Contingency 2.820 Subtotal $59,270 + 30% Indirect Cost 17.780 Total Storm Sewer/Open Channel $77,050 4956/11% D APPENDIX C PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL WALDEN HEIGHTS STORM SEWER Project No. 690 Parcel Description Total Assessment Walden Heights 1st Addition $85,520 Outlot A • • .9 . oS -, , I I I IIL I • • D/FFLEY ROAD (Co. Rd. 30)- t . f" .—'s—'� _ 1 (-T= ( —;-rrrrnTt r m'I► I I r _--_ 44\Y loore u Its .. . I�"; / .,.�, it. 11 4 1 _ 7 ik , A.. ■n■Ufll .; _ s� u:i w� 0, 414 0 -C n m 9 1 inn _ j Iw/ I .: 1 rdi -v - .v.,,,....P= 4/fa's illlii ; mIll In LTiNiTiP3- IP ' ' li;' 41 ffi2 -- 19 1 / ®lal�bg'8 .u, .I i , , c:..!. . ,.......:.„_,,,, .4 zw,.. „ ii.,,,, ,.., qv II.Vili il N -- -4'(//' k`:</iPz...5 ••\•61..uu �e�5, 4;av--1 . '� rst■t► . —iillii gIT.0,11 .,, ..,,,,,. k;k1 • W" 0 /II i o LI , “?.11,49..._/ *inc.-% .„-- €71.44 • f i 1 CLIFF I 1'-'•7 )• C l� II % mi; 2 (�„ ®�) !Q.717-1\4....47 (Co. Rd.3�) �1t�1.1\ 4e951-16,l< uur A i' �,. e , ,� j 7'��1. r `• % t r 1 . /cam A .. 1 . ,,,,,,c; j `l !1(r�., ill •�Y_N•liCr;i 1 1��1 N • �.. ..-.10\gr ,;1A-1---;-- e• ‘0---- ..; , 1 . 1 Ivi-di- .., fs E "1 ,d T i \ i �;' lX ' qj (�% �lf WALDEN rr , i, I ' PROJECT L OCA770N N I :I i 0 700 1403 Sean in fast LOCATION PLAN JABon stroo - __ Rosen EAGAN, MINNESOTA r_, And Mk d WALDEN HEIGHTS -- STORM SEWER IMP. Associat s CITY PROJECT No. 690 <49568FD1.DWG JULY 1995 COMM. . � j CLIFF ROAD1 , 1 - 1 I - I (Cq. Rd.32) I I J 2�2�, 2 ' 3 4 , Q.. 1 3 1 O2 , -1 .,1 CHAP,A_ .1 ` 5 3(1,-Q gli , 1 . k •-.. %■,_ —I �? ` 4 - �.�f 1� o "` 1 1 040-03 ; _ 4 10 7��J (1)20-0 '- j V - , t ' D30-0i I Q � , 8 6 !'7 • ���, 7 17 8 1 --I 12 11 L9'' 7 -� 4 cc - J z-\ 8�� 15 .-' J Ex.,ACCESS ; _.. �3 F�� 9 2 -t TO SERVE 11•-• 1,..._''10\\ \ 7 DOLOR_ S LA LIFT STATION,II 25 24 ` 11 29 • 1 �r. F.C■72....1 4 28 7 1 tit .+'"��• ���. 1 >3 12 27 {Z 8 " 2 1......—.7....— Q I iV-. ��\ i • �� 22 13 26 f g m -•N• `: !� ry21 14 ' 25 3- (n 3311 BP-6 `:� I �`' 0 © 4: 4� 19 5 W 5• , ; , \16 �1 X 11 :-C1:1 -(~_���OG, EXISTING `, 17 \ 1 12 6 6 / i OVERLAND ri 1- i 1 ' �.G� DRAINAGE ii' Ex. LOW ` 1. 2D 1 5 3 1 3 i 2 11 Ja q 18 .. - 0 4 \2 1 5 �(` 10 \i'12 } EXISTING II �l' (-x-17 7 5 \,3 1 _ I_ Aj.....! 1 : ....... ,.-r' HORSE TRAIL `�, OUTLl93\A I t I ��'�� l01!AT:I ,� EMOTED J ' ---'►5 `l y�l .. I 1 \.15 RAVINE t 4 \ 10 ,/ 030-29 I • �i% t• 0�,. 5 26 27 28 12 --—— — — 1 - N v -�,'�`\ I . 011-.78 i I f I . . • ill . DRAINAGE BOUNDARY • 0 200 400 Seele in fist i DRAINAGE AREA Bonestroo - Roeene EAGAN, MINNESOTA IGURE 2 Anderpk 3 Associat a WALDEN HEIGHTS — STORM SEWER IM . i Za-1 CITY PROJECT No. 690 ' ' 49568F02.DWG JULY 1995 COMM. 49 I I 1 111 i . . ,POND • /BP-6 I 28 7 , ,7'®' 23 r � . 040-03 27 i-, 8 ' ;,� EXISTING 22 Z 12" F.M. • _ 26 v _ 20 `'- Z EXISTING _ �� 2 15� 24 X10 LIFT 4_--- = 0 �' .'' STATION 19 �-' ,\.-` ( ) 16 23 11 EXISTING 1-..-'18 0 22 OVERLAND ,1 17 12 �� DRAINAGE r1/ 21 (NO EROSION) 602 ,7 Ex. LOW ;; 20 5 AREA ; (PONDED WATER) 1: :2,.:',,,,_____,.. _ - 19 4 t?- CD, :: --1— ,1,7-„ dt1TLOT A , i I \ J , 1 8 ,, y,I i •5.EXISTING , 1\ \ 1 r___---- � `\ 7 HORSE TRAIL ��, _;�___ ,_'��. , `i, \V. - • 16 1•EXISTING t ' ' ERODED ,- � x 15 .a, RAVI N E . - ' ` `� - • � _ _ PROPOSED - ---"�- - Z - STORA�/SEWER \ \'-- e' 13 (>B"l0 21') ` N ' ' 011 -78 12 ;, — — 1 0 100 200 liiMil Seae h feat PROPOSED 1983 LOT LAYOUT • STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENTS IA Bon stroo Ros n NI EAGAN, MINNESOTA FIGUR And rllk b Associates WALDEN HEIGHTS — STORM SEWER IMP. IVIII6 CITY PROJECT No. 690 49568F04.DWG .JULY 1995 . COMM. 49568 • Agenda Information Memo September 20, 1995 C. PROJECT 688,EAGANDALE CORPORATE CTR ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: To close the public hearing and approve Project 688, Eagandale Corporate Center (Streets & Utilities) FACTS: • In response to a petition submitted by Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance Company,the City Council authorized the preparation of a feasibility report for the installation of streets and utilities to service the 200 acres of the proposed Eagandale Corporate Center Addition. • The feasibility report was completed and presented to the City Council on August 15 and a public hearing was scheduled for September 20 to formally present and discuss the proposed improvements. • All notices have been published in the legal newspaper and sent to all potentially affected property owners informing them of this public hearing. As of this date, the City has not received any objections to the proposed improvements. ISSUES: • On September 7,the City received a letter from Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance Company indicating that they have requested that the City put a total stop to processing any subdivision and related public improvement process. Subsequent discussions with their representative,Mr.Dale Huber,indicates that they are not financially ready to proceed with development of the property at the present time. However,they would like to have the City Council approve the project to facilitate the future process if conditions change within the next year. ATTACHMENTS: • Feasibility report, pages/I° -/q3 • .0(2■ • city of ccigcr n Feasibility Report for Eagandale Corporate Center Utility and Street Improvements City Project No. 688 • Eagan, Minnesota - September 1 , 1995 File: 112-037-10 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY REGISTERED PROFESSIONA NGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF SOTTA�. • DA 9///pr REG.NO. -42 7,5y • CONSULTING ENCQIEERS - O FEASIBILITY REPORT FOR STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS FOR EAGANDALE CORPORATE CENTER EAGAN, MINNESOTA PROJECT NO. 688 I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly registered Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Xe 2 f/As Stev- ' 0. Gatlin, P.E. Date Reg. No. 12754 Reviewed by: MSA, Consulting Engineers 1326 Energy Park Drive St. Paul, MN 55108 : : Phone: (612) 644-4389 Fax: (612) 644-9446 PEAS-112.037 112 4337-10 i 4r IsiI 1 O1S1'L1116!`tiCIIEERI September 1, 1995 1326 Energy Park Drive File: 112-037-10 St.Paul,MN 55108 612-664-489 Honorable Mayor and City Council 1.800.888.2923 Ciry of Eagan Fax:612-6444446 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55122 RE: EAGANDALE CORPORATE CENTER STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS CITY PROJECT NO. 688 Dear Mayor and Council: Please find enclosed a copy of the feasibility report for the street and utility improvements . `°JI[ENG∎NE°-?ING. for Eagandale Corporate Center. The total estimated project cost is $2,657,655. ENV;RCNMENTA1 MUN;CPAI The project is proposed to be funded with assessments to the Developer, Northwestern PLANNING Mutual Life, Municipal State Aid construction funds; and City funds. We are prepared SCUD WASTE to present the report at the Public Hearing planned for September 20, 1995. JiRUC"JRAL SURVE:NG Sincerely, TRAFFC TRANSPC'RTA7CCN MSA, CONS ING ENGINEERS • • ,G,,,E, s-R EL T CN Ste en D. Gatlin, P.E. 5C;D Project Manager j(.S'A CCy1RC:S Reviewed by (Al D-,.artment of orb Reviewed by: Finance Department Date: OFFICES iN: MINNEAPOLIS SDG'pd PRIOR LAKE ST.PAUL WASECA FEAS-112.037 An Equal Oppornmi Em to re. • 112-037-10 • INDEX EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 INTRODUCTION 2 SCOPE 2 Exhibit 1 - Location Map 3 PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS 2 A. Sanitary Sewer 2 Exhibit 2 - Sanitary Sewer 4 B. Watermain 5 Exhibit 3 - Watermain 6 C. Streets 5 Exhibit 4 - Street Improvements 7 Exhibit 5 - Lighting Improvements 8 D. Storm Sewer 14 Exhibit 6-9 - Street Typical Sections 10-13 • PERMITS, EASEMENTS, AND LAND ACQUISITION 16 Exhibit 10 - Storm Sewer 15 • PROJECT COSTS 16 Table 1 17 Table 2 18 PROJECT FINANCING 17 ASSESSMENTS 18 PROJECT SCHEDULE 19 CONCLUSION 1 19 APPENDIX A - PROJECT COSTS APPENDIX B -PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL PEAS-112.037 111 112-037-10 IllIIl: EAGANDALE CORPORATE CENTER STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS CITY PROJECT NO. 688 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Introduction This preliminary report addresses the proposed utility and street improvements to the Eagandale Corporate Center as petitioned for by the Developer, Northwestern Mutual Life. The development consists of approximately 160 acres and is located northeast of the intersection of Lexington Avenue and Yankee Doodle Road. Proposed Improvements and Schedule The improvements include the installation of eight-inch gravity sanitary sewer, twelve-inch watermain, individual utility services, trunk and lateral storm sewer, and the construction of both Local Commercial Industrial and Municipal State Aid Streets. The project is proposed to be let in the spring of 1996 and completed by the fall of 1996. Project Costs and Financing The estimated project costs total $2,657,655. The method of financing this project will consist of a combination of funds including property assessment to the developer (approximately $2,436,650) and City funds (approximately $221,005). Of the total City cost, it is anticipated that the total amount will be eligible for Municipal State Aid funding. Conclusion In summary, the Eagandale Corporate Center is technically feasible from an engineering standpoint. Economic feasibility should be determined by the City's financial department and the project should be reviewed by the City Attorney. FEAS-112.037 -1- l 112-037-10 PRELIMINARY REPORT FOR STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS FOR EAGANDALE CORPORATE CENTER EAGAN, MINNESOTA PROJECT NO. 688 INTRODUCTION This feasibility study was initiated by petition from the Developer, Northwestern Mutual Life, and authorized by the Eagan City Council in April of 1995. The are a proposed for development is located east of Lexington Avenue, north of Yankee Doodle Road, west of the platted areas known as Eagandale Center Industrial Park No. 4 and 5, and south of Eagandale Center Industrial Park No. 3. The parcel is approximately 160 acres in size as shown by Exhibit 1, and is currently undeveloped and zoned Light Industrial. This study was conducted to determine the feasibility of providing City sanitary sewer and water service, storm drainage, and street improvements to the commercial development, hereafter called Eagandale Corporate Center. The Developer intends to grade the entire site under a private contract. The City would install the utilities, street, and storm sewer during the spring and summer of 1996. SCOPE The purpose of this study was to determine the most feasible method of providing streets and utilities to Eagandale Corporate Center. The scope of this study includes: preliminary design, layout, and analysis of sanitary sewer, water, storm sewer, and streets. Also included in the scope of this report is the preparation of a preliminary construction and project cost estimates and the preparation of a preliminary assessment roll. The project schedule and financing methods will also be discussed. PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS A. Sanitary Sewer Sanitary sewer is currently available to serve the site. Existing sanitary sewer lines are located along both Lexington Avenue and Yankee Doodle Road right-of-ways. A sanitary sewer stub and manhole exist at both Aldrin Drive and Neil Armstrong Boulevard. It is proposed that the sewage flows from the development be conveyed by 8-inch lines to be installed in the proposed streets with flows to the existing sanitary sewer, as shown on Exhibit 2. Sewage from lots adjacent to Aldrin Circle will flow west and north to the existing manhole located within the right-of-way of Neil Armstrong Boulevard just north of the proposed plat. An existing manhole located east of the pavement along Lexington Avenue will provide the means of collection for sewage from the two lots located in the northwest corner of the development. Another existing manhole located on the west end of existing Aldrin Drive will provide the connection point for the 8-inch line that will be FEAS-112.037 - 2 I ( 112-037-10 a i u i r r - • i. C ,��. . b> 'Q� A W 2 mQ 6 / o �>- oLv1 z. �. 03 O Q 3A121a SNf100 3>IIW fx S g a --.• fa z W A Q O v Y, I o :rte, <c : co U 0o J 'ellj , ° O v� ❑ `'��°. fa O W N 41:-) 1 :.:.:-:. : .: :-: . 0 3 3 1V3�f3 os ■ • • • • •: •41i :. : : 3AINCI ST1IH 110OS3M• .J ,•" •(,) .I ; < .. • .W J •a}Q;, ZI :� Z:�� Q v v ix !Q :Q. i W;1 }- W as 3 • *;: :; • . 3AINCI W Y •( :iii8- V:W1 : : : M31/�3100 z Q -�� z -(b•�i i�` zip •:: ¢ 3 i r 1 W w ::'aA18:0HOZi 1aY• :113N :• 51- ./ J • co co 3liff 131..\..): 3f1N3AV NOlONIX31 . a o �S•Z�� ' l \ § 12 Y ¢ ' 11 ck>s >- t) EL) LI-ce '`-- \--5 P-ItilFce . �\7 xW A Nw 1' � z ix wQ �\s O z ■ J 7---13-313NDi VW W r U . •13 HS118H1 Q 1- a�dSYn" < dh O = aO cx3 – \o — gi '-c,--11 boo ° A � v NO3O q►�7 Q � Q w id �.. � , r; o0 � o cti ' d ¢ cd o` l� --77 -Tr to to to a oo 'OS QTD SS D 3 in bls�3l ��a ,� F-7 N/ and �12idWN3Q , W '10 '-c ' iila- r . , _ i= , . 0 , .g c LL., b C j U LV fa 0 N o J W �3 " 0 b e X Q II CL W Q _.:.,f.::_73; {� LtJ Ct I I O- 5-- W a_ Z 'cc < m CC CC 1 Z = U CC 0 N L Zoo i W3 ofX0QX I— (i) I U O ?AQCLI UQ • ZaQvaO _ Ua r : UZU) LLJZ ---,_QQxNQ CC W -D inw _Dcn I W Li < >- I' z Z= z \a N Q 1.4 cn v) . a:.7,_._ . • . .;_ i,.,, . ' i .. z - - - ar : IN= .— - - - – - - - ; Z OQ I I 1 _ �JJ ¢ U V) / W O YY L I ", • l o In X LC CI u.4 I o dA 18 ��Idb� 113N o o cc .: r o zz _I y 11 o a 13M3S. VS„Z rX3, 3nN3n 11 .1f it ,...V . 1 "1`..P'.--1 -4 1 c -,--r ,. - III I FI1 I extended to the proposed cul-de-sac. The connection at Aldrin Drive will require jack- boring the pipe under the existing railroad tracks. The remainder of the development will have its sewage conveyed, by 8-inch lines, to the existing stub located at the intersection of the Neil Armstrong Boulevard extension to Yankee Doodle Road. Eight-inch sanitary sewer service stubs will be installed at each proposed lot. B. Watermaip Existing watermain is available to serve the site. Existing 12-inch watermain is located along Yankee Doodle Road, Aldrin Drive, and the north end of Neil Armstrong Boulevard. Existing 18-inch watermain is located along Lexington Avenue. The water system within the development was analyzed using Cybernet, a computer program, which modeled the proposed conditions to determine the watermain size required for the Eagandale Corporate Center ultimate development. The model utilized the pressures shown in the City of Eagan's "Water Supply and Distribution Plan", which was approved in 1988, and a fire flow of 3,500 gallons per minute (GPM). The 3,500 GPM fire flow is the basic fire flow rate for the City of Eagan as determined by the Insurance Services Office (ISO) in May of 1986. The 3,500 GPM flow rate is minimum flow rate required. The actual demand required by each building within the development will vary depending on the type of construction. For design and modeling purposes, a 3,500 GPM fire flow was used for a three hour period. The sizing of the watermain was reviewed with the City Fire Marshal, and it was determined that providing 12-inch watermain throughout the proposed development will provide the necessary fire protection. Based upon that analysis, 12-inch watermain is required within the entire development. This coincides with the 12-inch watermain as shown in the City's Water Supply and Distribution Plan. The development contains three cul-de-sacs, which will be looped to the system in order to balance.pressures and prevent problems associated with "dead ends". The new 12-inch watermain'will also be looped to the existing 18-inch watermain along Lexington Avenue by extending a 12-inch line from Neil Armstrong Boulevard along Challenger Drive. This connection will require open cutting of Lexington Avenue; therefore, a detour will be required. Connections to the existing watermain will also be made at both the north and south ends of Neil Armstrong Boulevard,just west of Wescott Hills Drive, and at Aldrin Drive. Similar to the sanitary sewer connection, the watermain connection at Aldrin Drive will require jack-boring under the existing railroad tracks. Two water service stubs will be placed per lot, consisting of an 8-inch service for sprinkling and 4-inch service for potable water. The proposed watermain improvements are shown by Exhibit 3. C. Streets In accordance with the City of Eagan Master Traffic Plan, streets within the development will be required to meet local commercial industrial design standards. The, two most heavily used access points proposed for the Eagandale Corporate Center will be the proposed intersection at Lexington Avenue and Yankee Doodle Road, as shown by Exhibit 4. Currently, Neil Armstrong Boulevard and Aldrin Drive are dead end streets; however, FEAS-11 2.039 - 5 - 112-037-10 I- G 0o c Z e @? G, co Z JW Q M d Q aU z z0 - - - - - Z � Z � .v w - R < Ug a ISM R ' II` _ w3 • < 0 V �� �d — - ` . fx . z 1 U < � Q w —Hw tx ° z WZ. _ 5 < W wQ �✓� ce pa w3 a O 1 ° ° 0 •Q F- � w 0 - 5 N W Z CC U � dZctI5Z ' I W3 _fin LIZ ZD •A OQ Q > Z. i ° V) (7vi = � p: ate ? C t 8 � a � R., aQLI :D Z pNI- I-� m W .� 3 Q _ Zr0 I--1:12 r LQ- _ — -Z3--- > 1 -.66/ . —ae / W Z �� CI Q .-_-_:= , , : = . : I U QQ 0 I I _¢ - 1 I / z - — - - - - - • 0 pN fj. L___, '§ i J ' HI1H / E a L . `® x. 04.13 8 JNOaLSk�R/ "132N w i � � ZQ .: " - ---• T — o I o -cn 'I Q o0 w .- 1 r } , 5 .. I - - - ... NIVW2131VM ,$L .�� ONILSIX3 01 103NNO / q r „ I I l II 1. I a= C ct w I i 1:r cil (.., a 9 i 0 X Q III a p �•- .wi V W cc III IL LL) _.z -�- �_,. III r 0 t,' �4. . r 0 Li_I (1 16 x \ , _ �p 1 Q o0 a- ° J I Mp � Q CI = ' _ 1 Z WO b I r: --- N � J � � _ �p • W .I p Li 0 1 < ei-rf,r_ov) w17:- ' 1 b lo , 5 . Luo ,, • . . N (i) 1 L . . 1 0 z , _ _____ „, cd O i z d t i b i 1I - � � O I 1 (.‘ i W.Z ° --—— t t. . Y� :s — k GA 18 11194d`d 19N , c� w Lt.) W u WW Oo • O OW OLLWC � 0_ W :: 3 „ :� ' ow W.02 Cr � - ° O: OO � Z= Q o 0 , 0_ V) r ,o o 11 c2 - ii L 0_ in0) < 0] 0- o- A .711 ..i. , T ^ ;I X , /• )-D 1 ii i V L cc W in 0_ _, w 0 g g c, a _ _ _ _ _ Z W O P m ----n-li — < 4:t - AO R Zr. Iii i a o 2 = ;=4w rx in 1 TI�,. - v r ac p : ° I J J_ , _ -` • G If I a 7/ I ■ .z 6 il / , 1 1 i T - I . 0,0,,c" O --rte I ----- , \... 1 C 1 . -..., dA18 Imo' 13N •., 0 o b o � II , iL 0.,--- ,i ° 3f1N' NIX3-1 r"� -1 r 1 11 q I Neil Armstrong Boulevard will be extended south to Yankee Doodle Road and Aldrin Drive will be extended west and terminate with a standard cul-de-sac. Aldrin and Neil Armstrong Circles will also be local commercial industrial streets that terminate with cul- de-sacs. Challenger Drive will be constructed to provide access to Lexington Avenue, and will require right and left turn lanes. An 8-foot wide bituminous trailway is proposed from Lexington Avenue to Aldrin Drive via Challenger Drive, Neil Armstrong Boulevard, and along the south side of Aldrin Circle to Aldrin Drive. This trailway will provide a direct route to the new North Park on the "Bochert-Ingersoll" property, as requested by the Eagan Parks and Recreation Department. . It is proposed that Neil Armstrong Boulevard be designated as a Municipal State Aid Street (MSAS), and it therefore must meet State Aid Standards. Currently, the MSA designation through the proposed development is from Wescott Hills Drive, northwest to Lexington Avenue, and across Lexington Avenue to the west. An additional through lane at Challenger Drive would be included in each direction in preparation for the future crossing of Lexington Avenue to link up with the future ring road proposed for the O'Neil property. Traffic projections of the development were done based on the developers site plan of the lots within the development and the 20-year projected average daily traffic (ADT) of 6,200, estimated for Neil Armstrong Boulevard. The projected traffic volume from southbound Neil Armstrong Boulevard to westbound Challenger Drive warrants a free right turn. The free right turn lane will require additional right-of-way at the northwest corner of Challenger Drive and Neil Armstrong Boulevard. The proposed street section for all the other streets, except Aldrin Circle, fit within the right-of-way shown on the proposed plat. Aldrin Circle will require a 66-foot right-of-way to allow space for the 8-foot wide bituminous trailway. It is proposed that Neil Armstrong Boulevard be a 40-foot wide street, with concrete curb and gutter and an 8-foot wide bituminous trailway from Challenger Drive to Aldrin Circle. This is the minimum street width, required by State Aid, which will allow parking on both sides of the street should the City choose to allow it. The 40- foot width also allows additional space for truck turning movements, and is consistent with the existing street widths both north and south of the proposed Neil Armstrong Boulevard construction. Aldrin Circle, Neil Armstrong Circle, and Aldrin Drive will be collectors with less traffic; therefore, the required street width will be 36 feet for one lane in each direction. Aldrin Circle will be extended to the existing Aldrin Drive and will have an 8-foot bituminous path on the south side of the street. An alternate to connecting Aldrin Circle and Aldrin Drive is the construction of cul-de-sacs. The cul-de-sacs will have a radius large enough to allow semi-trucks with trailers sufficient turning area. Challenger Drive will have four lanes, two in each direction separated by a 6-foot wide concrete median, for a total street width of 58 feet. The final determination of the number of lanes required will be done during the design phase of this project. Aldrin Drive will require an at-grade crossing of an existing railroad line just east of the proposed cul-de-sac. The crossing will require a resolution from the City, and the crossing must be reviewed and approved by the Minnesota Commissioner of Transportation prior to construction. The Commissioner of Transportation will determine if signalization of FE&S-112.037 - 9 - e,/ 112-037.10 CC Q c D. . ID 1Z � w c vi a 4/3 z 03 °ra .:. , • ./ g .J W LTL n `Y= V W • i 1.$5 I:121 c ZU aW U 7 z-•-• - O =E • 0 X 3Q f ma . . . . . . ma w° OW ma f W 12 aC' �a Y 1 �U) U ~ z iv`° 0 :O Z t w •N Q O ! Q ' ) N • - 0 Mo=ray digs +; R I Q<a c) o ;�v' asp :�sA L- 3 m m g r O , 11 NN1W,m ............................. . ... ... . . . .. .. ..... ZZWQ .:.:::.:.:.:.:.: .:.:.:.: .:•:. . .:. .:. : • . .. . .. . .. . .. .: . :.:...:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.: : :.: :.: . : ...... : •:•:. CD 1 2 2 X 5/ CD a i mmam W c am►n�' N N ;77) Jpp J U I W W U tD CO M M ' NN N N A 1 • ... (.................. • i (C2g■ 1 _ I gl. ' , . I-, I II I 44/,ii '- ''''''''2'..S's%.%.**%%.*%.%'%........*%**%. QQ0� v 0O Z � c � � O / 9 ' • • • • • • • • • 1 4,:e i,i■/. hy • v .. . I ao Q � 3 CO OJ j °�O O vct- . Q co 1:-;q/Pt. qi co m IS N- . c4) r V~ Ai CO • /1'... .l....."%%.,:if ''.'''''...,.......1 • '-'..--------,........ .. • . illr/4 ey* • 4 ,*,/, ,Ykki 447/-1(14,419.4V■Cb e L7 mr el Nr et A_v 41 0 a_v ...... ...........,,,,.,,,,,,,. ...,..., . . .. ...‘ . .. . • •. . . . v ta ■c- ( ---;-:1,:i..7... .,..,....,,..„.. . .. . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . -.'. . . . .. . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . , , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ,,v . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . - • -.. .... ......*: *.*.*. . .* •;.'. *. • *.*. . .*.* . . . *;;.'. ; ..• . • . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .64. • . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. i. %.,. ..% . . . .... . 1 . .. . . . . . . • * .-..i./......,.. ..... ..... . .*. .. ... . . . .... .- . ,.... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . .. . .. . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . k' . . . . ... . .. . .. . . . . • . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . O' 4. .. .... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . i . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4' Lk . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . • . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 r,." . N-4/ • • • • • • • - • 4. - * c>y co `blif-49- 44 . . . . . . . . . . . . t..,., ct... _... ., Ilk/ CY.Cpi i 4\f II /1/4 4.z•t.„,, cV A3 (N/ , A 4 / at ...N. Ic • 11.1- . . . . ' . ."..".'.•;.".".*.'.'. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . z. •■■•/4114, 41 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . ( . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . ................... ,,, ,, 0) 4 ............................. . . .-.-.-............................. . . TIT. g, . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . vq- 1Z%. AP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ;."..'.....'.1.1.1.*.*.*.*.*:.':.'.'.".'„*...*.•.".".'.'2.';.•.".".*.'."."." .*;.". . *%%%lk% • .■ 4/AtO NV h_V . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . • . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ,..... "Rti7 1i ...................... . . . .. . . .. . . ................................... .,.............. . • • " " " ' ,,y el - A . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1/40 -tir., .4i, -....g..':". .. •■,„ ' •.............-..... . . . •.-...-.........-.-.....•... 2.-.. ....-.... .-........;...-.......... '.;;*- ‘,..ii* . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . -A•;.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..................................................... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . .....-...... ' ......... 7 ''..."•.....,„,.. . . . . . . . . . . . -..,.. 4. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . a) kt . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . z, . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .c.)49 . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . .. . . . .. . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . •.4„. ..................-.-;.'.'. . . .'.'.-.....-.-.....-...-..... . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . O *, .. . . . ... . . . . .. .. .. . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . 0 . ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . iz: (.›. q) .0,,.‘: ■ ...-.-.............-. . . . ............................ . ..... ....... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (04-, 41W . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . - . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4Z.. / . . . . . .. .... . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . ....................... irs{'.24/441 1 Qoizr40 Co . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 0 N- Q, ■.1 0 _ i i..,sit.S. , ,, . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . • . . . . . . . . .. . . . . (1., 4— ... . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . k 4,4 4.„„f. .... ..s., 0 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .7..i..i.......i...i.....i...........i......r.......:........i.......i......"........i......:........i......:........i.......i.......ii......................................................... . .cv....... ................................................. ZZ co V47(s• . . . . . . . • . A?, 4Z, 4, 1,..4 i . . . . . . . • • • • • 9. 14., C.) (t) '14. . .............................................. • • •• • • " • • •• • " • • • • • " • • . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4:14°' ke‘igv;VA3 . . . . . . . . . . . . . , lb . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Co* . . . . . . . . . . . 04k.b./ • 0 . I 4"44/ ---"q1/41144erzt. ger . .,. ..„.. ..... / lovcs° _ . cy (V i „ aili,.•-■r./ .4... • 4./ 4?A, c• the crossing is warranted. Although signalization of the crossing is unlikely, we have included the cost of this work in the cost estimate in case the Commissioner determines it is warranted. Soil borings were taken over the site, and an estimated soil factor of 75% was used in determining the pavement design. The soil factor assumes that the roadways will be graded such that a minimum of 18 inches of granular material be placed in the street subgrade. According to the soil borings, granular material is available at the site; however, for estimating purposes, we have assumed that all of the granular material must be hauled to the project site. If material is available on-site, project cost can be reduced. • Exhibits 6 through 9 show the proposed typical street sections specific..to each street segment within the proposed development, but all the streets have the same pavement section; 18-inches of granular borrow, 9-inches of aggregate base, and 4-inches of bituminous. Draintile will also be placed along the edge of the street as necessary to . provide subgrade drainage. The street widths shown on the exhibits are the same as that proposed by the developer with the exception of Neil Armstrong Boulevard. Street improvements will also include street continuous lighting and boulevard trees. The proposed lighting improvements are shown on Exhibit 5. D. Storm Sewer The construction of new streets and the proposed commercial development results in the need for storm drainage improvements. The site contains an existing Department of Natural Resources (DNR) protected water, 134W, and four other wetland basins which cover approximately eight acres. A preliminary storm drainage plan for Eagandale Corporate Center was submitted by the Developer, and was used as a basis for the design and determination of storm sewer costs. A wetland mitigation plan has previously been submitted by the Developer and approved by the City, the Local Governing Unit (LGU) under the Wetland Conservation Act (WCA). Included in this plan was the construction of wetland mitigation ponds within the Eagandale Corporate Center development. We understand that City staff has reviewed the developed runoff volume calculations relative to the existing wetland and the proposed water quality ponds. MSA, Consulting Engineers is also reviewing all storm drainage calculations for the design phase of this project. These calculations will provide the basis for final design. The proposed storm sewer is shown by Exhibit 10. The storm sewer system will collect storm water runoff from the streets and developed lots and convey the runoff to one of nine water quality ponds. The water quality ponds will help remove sediment and suspended solids from the stormwater prior to discharge into one of four existing wetlands, to proposed wetland mitigation ponds, or to the existing 30-inch storm sewer stub west of Aldrin Drive. Two of the wetlands are identified as district ponding areas as shown by the City's "1990 Stormwater Management Plan". This plan identifies ponding areas and overflow pipe systems as "trunk" facilities while lateral storm sewers collect storm water from adjacent development. Discharge from these two wetlands to the existing City system will be via trunk storm sewer pipes. Outlet control structures with skimmers will FEAS-113.037 - 14 - 112-037-10 -- - , / , r. I I I III I - r , m N CC • CAW a l! ' C Z CD(.6zw° W A ° O 0.1 N a. Wce�� Q V �� C. w IU to C _ _L- W m Q ti ZO _ _ _ �O� Z w 0 co W 1n m Z L L �i�1 X a 1 Z Y F V ° °Wce ° 1 ZOGQx < 2 O =Ti. I • �ji• M7 W II_ 8o VI� W f c_Cr CO o°(-� n' • 1 Doff I O 0 0 1 ° lry�' o o I V joj°° ° 0 0 o po 1 I 0o 0 0 -. 4r1A --01 I .,°°° o aw yt, 1 l� 1 -J ° ZZ z� f' 1 c o\ o F _• Et., s 1 1L. Z 3 L iir' 1 igl ,A.6,i � Y o L\ i1 s ( � we.-6- . oo j\` gi . 0 ri _, 2 03.- :�3 ' w51 0 p g 'tea I - + -a ° � °J•• , _, 7 'PO 0 0 V)V) . r vi .„) . 0 . . 4 4 \ . • 1 : I - 11 , jf 1 OfT •E J 71 _ .- o if"� �� _ o, _�Cr 3 �W ZX z `� is 3 / E'er a°� N, o '"' V3 1—FRW L cc 1 0 1"RWI �V)N 11 •• 1 �Ni � �� --�w -117 •"<< • 7 1!F a �^.. ,, . ,, , 4 Q W 4 0 le k 1., I. I ' -.4" ,-. g l'.1 • •4 i 4 k e..... .A:, a \\,..). bc' . L o I c!r) '1 \1‘...,ww1111 % ..164.• iiv c.,,. . _.. , r e .,,r■'. . ,/ 0 .• 4 , r-3IN '' i U 1 WU 2E= (1) .....41- la o C- _ 3a a ° 00 ono ui--z-L...........,_= Cr:). 411"4 0 I El -- -- °°1- °° Mo,o,p « •fd\ . 'ii i. 0.f All iilli . i • --... 7 '.... '*.h 1 .N • prevent floatable debris from entering the outlet pipes which convey the stormwater discharge to the City's existing storm sewer system. The Iateral storm sewer that will collect runoff from the proposed streets and developed lots will be designed,for a 10-year recurrence interval. The dead storage volume for the water quality ponds was sized by the developers engineer based on runoff from a 2.5-inch rainfall. During final design, MSA, Consulting Engineers will verify that the pond volumes meet the City of Eagan's stormwater management plan and MPCA "Best Management Practices". Pond C, which is DNR Protected Water 134W, will be utilized as storage for a 100-year storm event. Stubs for future connection to the proposed storm sewer system will be provided to each lot for internal storm drainage improvements. It was assumed for the purposes of this report that the land required for the proposed ponding areas and trunk storm sewer pipes outside of the street right-of-way will be dedicated as drainage and utility easements to the City as part of the final platting process. In addition, since the grading of the development will be completed by the Developer prior to the installation of the storm sewer system, costs for the construction of the ponds including excavation and grading have not been included in this report. PERMITS, EASEMENTS AND LAND ACQUISITION The construction of the municipal utilities and streets to serve Eagandale Corporate Center will require the following permits and easements: • Sewer extension permit from the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency. • Water extension permit from the Minnesota Department of Health. • A permit from the railroad for jack-boring and street construction at the existing railroad tracks. • A permit from Dakota County for any work within their right-of-way. • The Developer will be responsible for acquiring any permits required by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources for work within existing wetlands, as well as the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency for grading of the site. As stated previously, we have assumed that all easements required for ponding and storm sewer will be granted by the Developer. In addition, right-of-way will be required for the stretch between Aldrin Circle and Aldrin Drive, if the cul-de-sac alternate is not constructed. Additional right-of-way will be required for the free right turn onto Challenger Drive from southbound Neil Armstrong Boulevard. 1 PROJECT COSTS The estimated costs for the proposed improvements includes the sanitary sewer, watermain, storm sewer, and street improvements. The total project cost includes the construction cost, a 5% contingency, and 30% for overhead, which includes administrative, engineering, fiscal, and legal expenses. The project cost,includes the construction of Aldrin Circle to Aldrin Drive. No costs ins-112.037 - 16 - • 112 os7-co • 1 ( 1111 1 have been included for the acquisition of right-of-way, utility, or drainage easements or site grading. These additional costs are the responsibility of the Developer. Table 1 presents the costs for the proposed improvements. TABLE 1. ESTIMATED IMPROVEMENT COST SUMMARY A. Sanitary Sewer Construction Cost $176,300 B. Watermain Construction Cost $322,000 C. Street Construction Cast $915,700 D. Storm Sewer Construction Cost $533,000 • Total Estimated Construction Cost $1,947,000 Contingency (5%) $97,350 Overhead (30%) $613,305 TOTAL PROJECT COST EAGANDALE CORPORATE CENTER $2,657,655 A detailed breakdown of the costs presented in Table 1 is included in Appendix A. PROJECT FINANCING The total cost of the improvements, less the cost for the bituminous path and trunk•storm sewer, is proposed to be assessed to the Developer. The total project cost for the watermain, sanitary sewer, lateral storm sewer, and streets to be assessed to the Developer is .approximately $2,436,650 and is shown in Table 2. This amount includes the cost for signalizing the railroad crossing at Aldrin Drive. The City of Eagan's current assessment policy states that the City will pay for the trunk storm sewer project cost. If Neil Armstrong Boulevard is designated as a Municipal State Aid Street, a portion of the street and storm sewer improvements will be eligible for State Aid Funds. The pathway costs will be paid by the City Park and Recreation Department's Pathway Fund. • FEAS-112.037 • 17 - • 112-037-10 TABLE 2. FINANCING EAGANDALE CORPORATE CENTER TOTAL PROJECT COST $2,657,655 Developer Assessment Watermain Project Cost $439,550 Sanitary Sewer Project Cost 240,650 Lateral Storm Sewer Project Cost 537,800 Street Improvement Project Cost 1,123,100 Railroad Crossing Signal Project Cost 95,550 Total Developer Assessment $2,436,650 City Contribution Trunk Storm Sewer $189,735 Bituminous Path 31,270 Total City Contribution $221,005 Total Developer Assessment& City Contribution $2,657,655 ASSESSMENTS Assessments are proposed to be levied against the benefitting properties as outlined in the City of Eagan's current assessment policy. A summary of the assessment policy for this project is summarized below: Zoning Type Commercial/Industrial Local Commercial/Industrial Streets Assessed City Street Construction 100% 0% Lateral Storm Sewer Improvements 100% 0% Trunk Storm Sewer Improvements 0% 100% Watermain Improvements 100% 0% Sanitary Sewer Improvements 100% 0% • With the exception of the trunk storm sewer and the bituminous path, it is proposed that the Developer of Eagandale Corporate Center be assessed the total cost for the improvements, since these improvements provide benefit solely to the Eagandale Corporate Center property. The total project cost for the watermain, sanitary sewer, storm sewer, and streets is approximately $2,436,650, and is shown by Table 2. Based on conversations with the Developer and the City Public Works Department, it has been determined that the assessment to the Developer will be on a unit basis, with each lot assessed one PEAS-112.037 - 18 - i I 112-037-10 1I 1111 1 unit. Based on the preliminary plat, the development will have 20 units. A breakdown of the proposed assessments is as follows: • Sanitary Sewer Assessment = SW4Q.650 = $12,032.50/Unit 20 Units Watermain Assessment = $439.550 = $21,977.50/Unit 20 Units Lateral Storm Sewer Assessment = $537.800 = $26,890/Unit 20 Units Street Assessment = $1.218.650 = $60,932.50/Unit 20 Units TOTAL ASSESSMENT/UNIT = $121,832.50/UNIT Appendix B shows two assessment rolls, one for the parent parcels and the second, requested by the Developer, based on the proposed lots as shown in the preliminary plat. PROJECT SCHEDULE Northwestern Mutual Life has indicated it would like to have all of the improvements constructed during 1996. The following project schedule assumes the final plat will be approved in Iate 1995 and permits from the appropriate agencies will be received in sufficient time to allow each task to be completed as proposed. City Council Accepts Feasibility Study and August 15, 1995 Authorizes Plans and Specifications City Council Holds Public Hearing, September 20, 1995 City Council Approves Plans and Specifications February 20, 1996 and Authorizes Advertisement for Bids Open Bids March 28, 1996 City Council Awards Contract April 16, 1996 Construction Starts May 15, 1996 Construction Complete September 1, 1996 City Council Receives Assessment Roll September 1996 Final Assessment Hearing October 1996 FEAS-112.037 - 19 - r 1124037-10 l This schedule assumes that the developer will have all the site clearing and grading complete prior to the initiation of the City contracts. Although the Developer may waive the right to a public hearing, the City normally elects to hold a hearing due to the allocation of City funds to this project. CONCLUSION The Eagandale Corporate Center utility and street improvements include the construction of sanitary sewer, watermain, storm sewer, and street construction within the entire area. The project is proposed to be completed in 1996. The estimated total project cost for the • improvements are estimated at $2,657,655 and this cost includes all construction costs, contingencies, and project overhead. The project would be financed primarily through property assessments to the Developer with some contribution from the City of Eagan Stormwater Utility Fund for trunk storm sewer and Municipal State Aid street funding. The proposed assessment amount is estimated at $2,436,650 and the estimated City cost is approximately $221,005. The Eagandale Corporate Center Utility and Street Improvements project is technically feasible from an engineering standpoint and conforms to all standards and guidelines of the City of Eagan. The project should be carried out as a single contract—specifically, a combined sewer, water, street, and storm sewer contract to be let in 1996. The economic feasibility of the improvement should be reviewed by City staff and fiscal consultants. • HAS-112.037 - 20 - 3 112-037-1C APPENDIX A PROJECT COSTS • FEAS-112.037 112-037-10 APPENDIX A PRELIMINARY CONSTRUCTION COST ESTIMATE EAGANDALE CORPORATE CENTER PROJECT NO. 688 ITEM ! NO. ITEM UNIT QTY UNIT PRICE TOTAL PRICE A. ESTIMATED SANITARY SEWER CONSTRUCTION COST 1 CONNECT TO EX MANHOLE EA 2 $500.00 $1,000.00 2 JACK-BORE 8" PVC LF 80 $175.00 $14,000.00 3 8" PVC (8=10') LF 200 $16.00 $3,200.00 4 8"PVC (10'-12') LF 746 $17.00 $12,682.00 5 8" PVC (12'-14') LF 1061 $20.00 $21,220.00 6 8"PVC (14'-16') LF 875 : $24.00 $21,000.00 7 8"PVC (16-18') LF 570 $26.00 $14,820.00 8 8" PVC (18'-20') LF 600 $27.00 $16,200.00 9 8" PVC (20'-22') LF 300 $28.00 $8,400.00 10 STANDARD MANHOLE EA 20 $1,200.00 $24,000.00 11 MANHOLE EXTRA DEPTH (>8') LF 128.13 $100.00 $12,813.00 12 OUTSIDE DROP CONNECTION EA 2 $700.00 $1,400.00 13 DROP EXTRA DEPTH LF 6 $70.00 $420.00 14 8"X 8"SERVICE WYE EA 24 $70.00 $1,680.00 15 8"PVC SERVICE PIPE LF 1210 $12.00 $14,520.00 16 GRANULAR MATERIAL TON 1312 • $6.00 • $7,872.00 17 SODDING, BOULEVARD SY 150 $2.10 $315.00 18 DENSITY TESTS EA 20 $40.00 $800.00 T ESTIMATED SANITARY SEWER CONSTRUCTION COST-TOTAL $176,342.00 • 112037EE.WK4 r L J 112-037-' •-, • , I i l Hi 1 • APPENDIX A PRELIMINARY CONSTRUCTION COST ESTIMATE EAGANDALE CORPORATE CENTER PROJECT NO. 688 ITEM NO. ITEM UNIT QTY UNIT PRICE TOTAL PRICE; B. ESTIMATED ATERMAIN CONSTRUCTION COST 1 12"X 18"WET-TAP EA 1 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 2 CONNECT TO EX. 12"WATERMAIN EA 4 $600.00 $2,400.00 3 JACK-BORE 12" DIP LF 80 $210.00 $16,800.00 4 4"DIP SERVICE PIPE LF 790 $12.00 $9,480.00 5 6"DIP LF 130 $15.00 $1,950.00 6 8" DIP SERVICE PIPE LF 790 $18.00 $14,220.00 7 12"DIP LF 8460 $22.00 $186,120.00 8 12" BUTTERFLY VALVES EA 10 $1,400.00 $14,000.00 • 9 HYDRANT WNALVE EA 13 $1,600.00 $20,800.00 • 10 FITTINGS LB 22425 $1.75 $39,243.75 • 11 GRANULAR MATERIAL TON 1820 $6.00 $10,920.00 12 INSULATION SF 200 . $1.10 $220.00 13 DENSITY TESTS EA 20 $40.00 $800,00 T ESTIMATED WATERMAIN CONSTRUCTION COST-TOTAL 6321,953.75 (So 112037EE.WK4 112-037-' • • APPENDIX A PRELIMINARY CONSTRUCTION COST ESTIMATE EAGANDALE CORPORATE CENTER PROJECT NO. 688 II ITEM NO. ITEM UNIT QTY UNIT PRICE TOTAL PRICE !, C.1 ESTIMATED STREET CONSTRUCTION COST 1 MOBILIZATION LS 1 $10,000.00 $10,000.00 2 RAIL ROAD CROSSING SIGNALIZATION LS 1 $70,000.00 $70,000.00 3 STREET LIGHTING LS 1 $129,000.00 $129,000.00 4 SELECT GRANULAR BORROW CY 19,943 $8.00 • $159,544.00 5 4"DRAINTILE LF 3,000 . $4.00 $12,000.00 6 SUBGRADE PREPARATION RDSTA 76 $125.00 $9,500.00 7 AGGREGATE BASE, CLASS 5 TON 19,797 $6.00 $118,782.00 8 TYPE 41A,WEAR COURSE MIX. TON 3,994 $21.00 $83,874.00 9 TYPE 31B, BASE COURSE MIX. TON 3,994 $20.00 $79,880.00 10 BITUMINOUS PATH SY 3,993 $4.50 $17,968.50 11 BIT. MATERIAL FOR TACK COAT GAL ' 1,568 $1.25 $1,960.00 12 CONC. CURB & GUTTER, B618 LF 16,455 $5.25 $86,388.75 13 4"CONCRETE MEDIAN SY 333 $17.00 $5,666.67 14 PAVE. MESSAGE (TURN ARROW) EA 4 $35.00 $140.00 15 SILT FENCE, HEAVY DUTY LF 13,000 $1.75 $22,750.00 16 CATCH BASIN SEDIMENT BARRIER EA 47 $60.00 $2.820.00 17 SODDING, LAWN & BOULEVARD SY 20,006 $1.75 $35,010.50 18 PAVE. STRIPING, 4" EQUIV.WIDTH LF 7,745 $1.80 $13,941.00 19 SIGNING LS 1 $3,000.00 $3.000.00 20 BOULEVARD TREES EA 310 $150.00 $46,500.00 21 TESTING LS 1 $7,000.00 $7,000.00 T ESTIMATED STREET CONSTRUCTION COST—TOTAL $915,725.42 C.2 ESTIMATED_BITUMINOUS PATH CONSTRUCTION COST 1 CLASS 5 AGGREGATE BASE TON 825 $6.00 $4,950.00 2 BITUMINOUS PATH SY 3993 $4.50 $17,968.50 ESTIMATED BITUMINOUS PATH CONSTRUCTION COST—TOTAL $22,918.50 • 112037EEE.WK4 I 51 112-037-1i --, ' . o I I I n] I APPENDIX A PRELIMINARY CONSTRUCTION COST ESTIMATE EAGANDALE CORPORATE CENTER PROJECT NO. 688 ITEM II NO. ITEM UNIT QTY UNIT PRICE TOTAL PRICE I' D.1 ESTIMATEEL$TORM SEWER CONSTRUCTION COST • 1 CONNECT TO EX. STORM SEWER EA 3 $400.00 $1,200.00 2 12"RCP, CLASS V LF 1380 $22.00 $30,360.00 3 15"RCP, CLASS V LF 274 $24.00 $6,576.00 4 18"RCP, CLASS III LF 2830 $28.00 $79,240.00 5 21"RCP, CLASS III LF 1997 $32.00 $63,904.00 6 24" RCP, CLASS III LF 508 $34.00 $17,272.00 7 27"RCP, CLASS III LF 532 $37.00 $19,684.00 8 30" RCP, CLASS III LF 200 $40.00 $8,000.00 ' 9 33"RCP, CLASS III LF 500 - $45.00 $22,500.00 • 10 36"RCP, CLASS III LF 254 $55.00 , $13,970.00 11 42" RCP, CLASS III LF 342 $85.00 $29,070.00 12 48"RCP, CLASS III LF 684 $90.00 • $61,560.00 13 JACK-BORE 30" RCP LF 50 $250.00 $12,500.00 14 GRANULAR MATERIAL TN 2292 $6.00 $13,752.00 15 OUTLET CONTROL STRUCTURE EA 14 $2,000.00 $28,000.00 16 OUTLET STR. W/SKIMMER EA 6 $2,500.00 $15,000.00 17 2 X 3'CATCH BASIN EA 4 $900.00 $3,600.00 18 STANDARD MANHOLE EA 29 $1,200.00 $34,800.00 19 60"DIAMETER MANHOLE EA 8 $1,700.00 $13,600.00 20 72" DIAMETER MANHOLE EA 3 $2,300.00 $6,900.00 21 84"DIAMETER MANHOLE EA 2 . $2,700.00 $5,400.00 22 96"DIAMETER MANHOLE EA 2 $3,000.00 $6,000.00 23 MANHOLE EXTRA DEPTH ( > 8' ) LF 132 $70.00 $9,240.00 24 18"RCP FES EA 3 $400.00 $1,200.00 25 21"RCP FES EA 21 $450.00 $9,450.00 26 24"RCP FES EA 2 $500.00 $1,000.00 27 48"RCP FES EA 3 $1,000.00 $3,000.00 28 FES MARKER POST EA 29 $65.00 $1,885.00 29 RIP-RAP,CLASS III CY 144 $80.00 $11,520.00. 30 TRASH GUARD FOR FES LS 1 $2,000.00 $2,000.00 31 DENSITY TESTS EA 20 $40.00 $800.00 T ESTIMATED STORM SEWER CONSTRUCTION COST-TOTAL $532,983.00 112037EE.WK4 112-037 APPENDIX A PRELIMINARY CONSTRUCTION COST ESTIMATE EAGANDALE CORPORATE CENTER PROJECT NO 688 ITEM it ' NO. ITEM UNIT QTY UNIT PRICE TOTAL PRICE; D.2 ESTIMATED TRUNK STORM SEWER CONSTRUCTION COST 1 CONNECT TO EX. STORM SEWER EA 2 $400.00 $800.00 2 18" RCP, CLASS III LF 2535 $28.00 : $70,980.00 3 JACK-BORE 30"RCP LF 100 $250.00 $25,000.00 4 GRANULAR MATERIAL TN 509 $6.00 $3,056.21 5 STANDARD MANHOLE EA 7 $1,200.00 $8,400.00 6 60" DIAMETER MANHOLE EA 1 $1.700.00 $1,700.00 7 MANHOLE EXTRA DEPTH ( > 8' ) LF 99.65 $100.00 $9.965.00 8 18" RCP FES EA 5 $375.00 $1,875.00 9 OUTLET CONTROL STRUCTURE EA 4 $2,000.00 $8,000.00 10 TRASH GUARDS FOR FES LS 1 $1,500.00 $1,500.00 11 RIP-RAP, CLASS III CY 96 $80.00 $7,680.00 T ESTIMATED TRUNK STORM SEWER CONSTRUCTION COST-TOTAL $138,956.21 • • • • 112037EE.WK4 112-037--I r ti 3(11 illy 1 • APPENDIX B PRELEVIINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL • • • • PEAS-112.037 O 112-037-10 • 'I-, ; . . ••W I • . o' �! N I C' O I• I .4,11 •r• .01 'C)I 1 r• CT,:01011 OI 'NI ;r I ,{OI M7! 1 •. WI 1 lull Imo. . ! -• I �i .Q I I I j I : NI I ;.,-•I : i^! INI : 101 •Ni I I I ' ! I. i I i •1• Q: :se Wi �1 1 I I I I 1 : i I i I i I I I 1 I ; 1 I I 1 If.i �I lull 1 �• 1 ICN91 I ;01 I I 1 W I • I I(01 I I 1 1 1(CI t0 I I I IW ir: 17711 1 ,^1 I I 1 1 o1 I{ ' I I IF�..i� �'I anol i-; Ir-, I ral.V1 i01 COI ►r' C r' i !WI I 1.r, t+1 vl i t I I I ► ! I�'1 1 w1 I !wI I I"'I {"'I I 1 I ■ : I 1 i ; I I .■ : j I I I ICI 1 Ir. Qll ml i Iv.; 1 101 I i I 4 1 10 ► ki! (O I I al 1 I I I lallwi4,i 1 Imp in' i I Ir. I In;► 110131m ;: ICI I . I ICI 11 1 1 ' I INiN a I(AI I Ind frHl I�j col Iii I lei I . i I { I I I IZ: ; I. I 1 r1 I l ,-! I I I I Ia1 ,.: (I I/I INI CI I I oil II it I l=lNl I r1 NI I01 Irl Iof1 Wiai 1,1 C O1 �, MI QI V'I QI N9I I V'I w III 31 i I Iwf ICI I(AI Iwi ICI ' • 1 1 1 I I I I 1 1 1 1 I i 1 1 ��� l ; °I Imo' lot�I of Iol mit I I I pet W 4,i l X11 f 101 F.!! oil I ,,D.! ini 1 ;d' i IJI 1 !~;31v11 I •In t01 ICI lc, t� I ..II i INIfA a, I ICI I IlVI Iml ICI 1 I I '2 ! I ct! 1 1 I 1 I I 691 EA! l I IV I Zi 1Xi I I I I I I I I I I { :W I 1 Wj I :0141 iWl I jcii �1 0{ IaI I 'I'' ! 2I 1 W.Z.xi I 101 I ICOI 1 oii I I I (AI ( la V 1CJ1 I co; I 1 rt I I•I o col tAI at Qi I`cl I�•I I Iii f rl iQI rf I 1 1 1 ..IX �� III 1 I IIi ' { 1 :O , <i I t i I I I I I :wl > I1 l III 1 I l 1 � { lQ Z; 1 1 1 1 III I { 1 I I II-, N i I I I , I I HI .Z 1 G I I I 'C) r• I NI IM 'ZI IQ I J Z1 : I uN u?! IIn! WI 1WI :0 1,,,,ol of 1 of I CI 21 . { ;CD ; I �; 11= { ?I © Ioi IoI WI I W , 10.1 ICI- I oI of loi I °I WI I 1 1 Iv I I ? ��I al 1°0l 1°0l I� I . r r1 I I i !WI i ► C)? o1 of 101 1 1� I G: al I o CI Io1 '61 I I j ' I I.' Iri rl 'f-'I I I I 1 1 1 ■ 1 { I la ii l I I I I I I- Ill I I I k i ' I { i,' i ( I I 1 ' I j i 1 I I I I I I I 1 1 1 I ! I I I I I I I { I j I 1 I 1 I ► 1 1 1 1 I I I I I i I ! 1 1 ! 1 1 I I 1 , I i I I I I I 1 I I I i 1 Ii ! ■ I III I i I Lill WI Iu11 'WI 1 JI 1J1 IJI 1 11 1 ; 11 1 I s1 al lal IZI. 1 1 I I I 1 I MI MI 1 IWI I I ICI I Imo; { M' I ICI I 1 1 I ! 21 I 21 i Ii1j w. 1I:�' zi ; Iz: 'zI 1 1 1 1 4a' I IWI cc, I IwI !WI I 1 I I ! i 1 II' l'UJ-11 I- 11-' I I-'i I I I i 1 I WI 1 IWI I IWI I 1 I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1I: 11I3 �, I 1111 1 1 i 1 I 1 61 81 of o) II I 1 ► 1 z: z z: z. I I i I { l I I I I 1 I I , I • I I; I C I I , Il ur i • • I I 1 1 I..., 1 'z' I°! 0. 01 0' of •0, i !01 • ICI 'oi . :K)I to1 . 101. .tot :01 , ,1[11 ;In1 •to; ! , ' • ;a11}�.l 'N, 'Ni N. , 'NI •N, N1 IN! 'N1 'N! 'NI :N; • 2 !!71 • thI tn 1 MI M' •c i .M1 ,1"')I '471 'M, en, • • 1 e !0121 :eo! : 1.901. 0. ! .m; , lea; • ••co! I Iea! ; ,co! ; 1 R •c»; _�i ! W I.�, ;-• '-• • ,-• ,�• .rI I •. •.'-• .•! ir12i INI t .NI NI , ;NI 1 N, ,NI 'NI , NI I INI ,(V1 'NI • ! ; •.•' ...• r I .• ' ..- ....• ....• I !.■I I r ^• t i 1 I ! ! , a :wI ! !401 • ;w1 I Iwi .i i •e .i 1401 ' Iwl !wi i ;401 vii•i • ! I ! I I i I j ! I ! i ! I I I I I I I ! " 1 : { ! I• I I I ' 1 1 !� ill 01 Ioi ! ioi ' oI i Iol . I0I ! 01 Ioi Cl I lal i Ioi 1 I (to �I I u)1 I In I ;In.1 ;� ; !� i"I I 111)1 1 I In i In 1 I i Iw y INI ( ,N! 121 N I I NI j (V INI ! INI I M {{{ C7 f C.) cm ! C�1 tom) R) ,R7 1 R1. ! C')I [ry I 1 I ! I15,,,9 Io1 I !O)I I '10)1 IQ)I 10)1 ; TI 1 Q)1 O)1 1 101 1 101 1 10; 1 { 1 iji2 I01 ! I°I ! I�1 (�i iii ! 10I °1 �I ! 1(0 01 t»1 'M W I tri I I 131 t9 /A ! t9I (A 11 I III 1111. 1 ! 111 111 ! " 1111 11 � II ; I Ili I , I poI 1 ! i ! p t ; 1 I f I I ! I 1 , ;• I I ► I I ICI I :01 ,01 1 Ci I o I 110 OI Io 1 OI I OI 1. 01 I 1 101 01. C t0! Io o I o I a IoI 1 oI ■ ( CC w (0 o! 1 Iol IoI I o l Ioi I Io of 1 c I of of I of I I 1 0)t 0)1 0)I 0) 1 0) 0) O)1 0) 0)1 O1 rn { I O,tau a mI Ia1 1(DI "ao Im 1 �ao1 901 ea, t I op. 1 1(0 I 2 2 (O 1 ;tD I I tC I (O I !tC I (0 I I CD co I(0110.1 I (D , I(,j 1 I I I 1 I�! i ;�i !w! 1.w ! jwi i �40i I IN 1401 1 101 ; !401 1 �w! j 1 1 1 ; 1 I " ; i I 1 1 I ! (�•+ i IQI IoI I {ai 1 of I o lai of Ial 101 I 10, ! 101 j 10 I I l 0)( ! In 1 I to l I 1'0.1 In 1 I I IA I I u'? I to! to 1 1 I to l .1411 I to! ' 1 ! j IWI t (�S(0 I:! i ,�, I jr-i t- Ir..; r. 1.t I 11■ ! t- , I -• 1 ,^; 1 ti• ti. r., I\1 ( f., f. r., r.1. r.; r.1. It,, I I =I i W 2 1011 I 10)1 ! •0)1 0)1 O)! O)1 10)I CI I0)! I 10)1 10)1 i {I- Q r, .-" I 1�, ._1 �, I ICI �, ICI I 1,..1 ! I 1 wi I I I! 1 1.1 , ImoI 401 , 401 I 1;; . 169; 1401 ,te1 i 1401 1 I . • I 1 ' 1. I I I 1 1 1 I I 1 1 I I i t 1 1 1 1 I I ICI o1 o I a o of 01 101 0 CI 1 IoI I aI 1 I I I r' In I to 11 11n 1 1 to 1 )In I i i In 1 1n I In I 1 u)! v)1 I I W1 1 1QIW??IVj NI (VI ,NI (4 NI I NI (VI cVi INI 1 IN I INI Il,f. ! d1 l~!}Itn Ci ! Lh1 I I(1)I C I ,ot )tat I(r) I Ie")t I IMI "R)1 ! tnl 101 oI of oI . at ,o IoI of I o ' Iol • I 01 I ZIWIQ INI 1 'oil I INI N! INI I 1N N! ! I(VI INI i INI ( 1 a I • 1Z I IWI I i I2, irsl , ,(si I la;•1 491 I Itot I 1691 It91 1 1.491 ,�I ■ Iv)! I 1tA! I ! v I kill 1 111 1 ! 1 1 I I i i I i f I l i I I ' I i Ian of { �1wi in ► 1 1 1 i ' ! 1 I I I l I I 11 , 11...! : 1,_1 ! iiii • I I l I i! I 1 Qlm LL ~ I I 1 I I ! I I 1 ! I i I I I IQ Q1 Ial ! 101210 I I I I I l I I I I I I i I 1 i ! , 1 1 1 ! 1 1 i CNI 1 i I 1 1 1 1 i I I 1 11 ! ; 11 ! 11 S i Ia f I �; TI III o I I I I I I I 1 I I _ 1 1 , 1 1 I ! . I l i 1. 1O I I °X' °! ! I I I I I I S I I 1 I I I 1 I I I S I I Hi I S I I I 1 1 c I 1 �; 1 I 1 1.i• I I Ii ;Y.! CC 1 Ir, I 1 1.i, 1.i I 1 1 ,m! , Iz! ' 1 m l I WI IWI I tWi WI WI I WI W 1 1W1 IWI 1W1 I IWI 1 IJ i WI Z' I IZ1 1 'Z: ZI I IZ I ;Z1 1Z! I (ZI I IZ! I •Z! " iZI 1 , Ia 1 ( g! 1 1 W1 RIP I •WI , WI :WI IWI WI I !WI IWI " 1W ; IWI • 1 IG ' 10)1 I i I IU! 101 ;C)I 1 IC)! 1 ICI 1 1U1 I C)I I IU 1 1C)I I ;C)I ! IVI 1 'Z Cl)) I WI ,WIT1 'WI 1 WI r IWINI ,WIN ,W!e)I WI() WI�I Wlt�i IWI�j I IQ I w zi 1-' IF-I i !f-; 1-' I 11-1 I l~I 1-1M1 1..•, 1 • • t1.•-• l- !C`7I Cl)lI 10 QIYI 1Q, • IQ/y11 QIY ,Q,Y, ,QIYI <IY, IQIY Q•Y! IQiY! IQIY: I 1 1-1 Ir•U ct,01 II•a!oi cc,o1 x•Q) !� 0I ce'0I a 01 CCtQ1 iCC;QI CC.()1 I 1Q • Cl)) ai .0101 10101 (0101 0101 10101 ;0101 0;01 10101 0101 '0101 1010: ,W Q1 1 111 0•�l, 0:J1 a;Jl J1 a.JI 10:.11 19,.11 10;J1 10!.11 l0•�Jl 10,.11 I , I :L1; IccIm! icc:ml Itx:0; =im; ;m:01 Itr:0l oi0I ;cd'm1 1m:m1 Ilr:ml 'lx:Ial 1 }'; 1 'C)1 101r1 QIN! !01(01 Olen 10,..! 101Ni 'OIr-1 OINI OIMI 101.71 :01tn. I 1 I I z, 1 !2I 0I�; 1C)11-1 IUII_ 1 C)11•-1 IUIF, !Oi!-. 101)1 1011.-I 1°'i-., I( IF• 'C)II•-. ; I j j 1pi WiOI 1WIO1 :WIOI WIO1 IW1O1 1w1OI 1WI01 1111101 WIO! .WIOI .WIOI z J;JI 1J!J .J1JI JIJ J1J1 1J ..JI IJIJ •JJ! JIJI •-•I!JI JIJ, III ! ; 1 ¢' ,Q: j ;Q; , IQ: Q! , ¢i I Q , I¢' 1 Q: !Q11 I ! I 0" I CI 01 1.‹;C CI 1 101 1 101 . 10! 1 DI I :0: I 01 • 1111 I ; z' !z! I ,z• z1 1 Iz! IZ: 1 1z1 Iz' Z: IZ' I J I , <1 Q1 Q: Q IQ1 1<1 i QI Q1 Q• I .¢ 1 1Z:Q,1 1 �I I I 4I I 4I 141 14 114! IQS 1 IQI I¢I I QS i !QI 1 lal , I1 l a.i WI iWI IWI IW I IWI I IW I W IWI W 11W1 WI I 'I 1 1 I 1 1, I 1 1 • I ( ! I I I 1 . I I I 1 1 I I • I 1 I I I , I ! 1 f I I I I , I i l I l I l i i i l ! I 1 I i I i I I ' " I tit 111 111111 I1. I , 111 11 1 1 I I I 1 1 1 I i i I i 1 I 1 j i i I LL, I_, I ItW_L LWLI I IUW.I I ILL. I W. I •LWWI I !U.. 1 I.-I I ILL: I I 1 • ' 1 'JI JI I IJ JI i.11 J1 1 Jl 1 'J 1 1J1 -I J( Jl 1 I 1 { •j ! i 1 .JI IJI J J1 11J! 11JI I J IJI II !JI 1J1 1 i t II I I a: IQ• IQ, Q 1Q: 1¢I ¢I a iQ 11•Q• I la I I I I CI 101 •CI C I ',CI 0; I > >1 I01 101 1 1.01 I I i 1..., 1.., II-' 1-I ,1-' 11-1 I.., 1- p. I ip. I 1-.• , I I i I =1 101 • ;0c1 I CI I ;01 CI 1 01 SC 1CI 1 101 1 10c1 ! I 1 i 1 ! Wi 2. !2; 1 11.,, ! ICI 2. 1.2" ■ ZI 121 121 2i ' ,`! 1 i I ' ' I ICI z' I Iz: 1 z: I zI ( jz! Iz1 1 z1. IZI I Iz1 I iz; i Iz! • 1 I I I 11<; �! ,�, I �! �! ,�! 1�I I ,�' a �! l ice, ,�: 1 ill WI IW: 1 WI ! WI I WI IWI ,I IWI 11WI I 'WI I iWI !WI , I ! I 1 I I Vr)! I II-.v) i 1u~)i I Ni yi I i~• 1(01 ! IF- i(0 , r• (01 ! i I I I. INI ! :21 1 (n! 1 cm • 1u)1 :fn1 I I 1 ' Wi ■ 'WI I IWI W; :W ; 1Wi , ;WI IWI )WI i •iWl I iWl 1 I ! ! ► ! ! I : 1 ! ! ! I 1 I ! 1 I , 1 I II 1 , I 1 1..; 1 , 1 i I I 2, IS; t 1 'Si !2i 21 21 I •+• ' Ii'1 ' ! F-' H• 111 r II- , H1 1•- 1 •• I-, I H• I ," I I I 1 z! IX: �I �: IX: l� Imo! I , �I Ce! ICC! 1 !z1. 1 I f ; I ! OI I OI 1 101 01 10. ' 1 OI j01 ( IOI OI 1 101 1 101 l 1 I I 1 IZl Iz, 1=I 1 zi I IZI 11z: I IzI I z 1 Iz, I Iz' 11z • 11 1 I 1 ► j 111 1. i 1. i I1 ! 1i . • • ! IZ' I 'O O• O. _ O' '01 OI 0: 01 •0: IOi 1 I 1 '•WI I . 1�1 111' . 10: 101 • '101 • cnI U). '4) • • IQi�I I M. MI • 01 NN7� iMi l een1 l eel( mi �eNhi ( I I�I t • 101(1)1 I jm <: ca.! Cal i Ical j e>DI • ,ml �1 IQI I iP9t j ! I . • . I�1 WI • r• ,r. ; .r. , lr. r: ! ; r. •r• i Ir f i 1H N NI :N. NI •NI , •Nt INI I 'N1, NI 1 'NI I NI 1 • { 1�! I hl .{/)VI - yl ' WI IeAI , !(tAl 1 I�I �, I !w! I I i ; , i I � . I 1 Q f i ! j ( 1 ! li i 1 I 1 I I i . I I I , ! i i ; 1 ! . I l i ! 1 1 • ' I•I 1 1 ; ! i 1 I I : • Io1 I of I j ! !01 ! OI 1 i0I : 10, 1 101 I io 1 OI 'O' 11 I I 1 I I 1- 1ui1 . 1LgI 'u�1 j I n.I 0. I 1 1 I41I •u�i I ((0 I 1 I lNl NI 1 :NI 1 INI ! INI IN jN NI 1N I W I N 1MI I ;NI I •01 i I MI ! r1I I Ie'9I mi I !oil I 10)1 I NI I I I I 1 CC N 0! I 'ol i !a11 ,a)1 ; T! 011 I Ia)I ;01 w r F.IQ Io, Io1 Oi Io1 Idi I Io of i dI I Il __I i I I I IN 101 1 1(01 1 '101 . c01 I ;c01 lecl 1 I�1 ' 'e0! 1 101 I 1 1 1 1 i I Iwl I `pI !�� I 1�I 1 I"'I I :�. i 1�1 I iii I I I "''1 I i 1 1 I ! i 1 1 I . . 1 I I ! : 1 . 1 ' 1 i ' 1 I 11 1 1 1 ' . i I lIc`i101 I 101 I ;01 ;91 1 ;01 ! 101 ' '•01 ICI 1 'O! ! ' OI I I I I I I I ! Wy ',di I ;di id; I of :61 di !di 1 Io1 , cal ea I 1 i I a)1 O)1 Q)I 1 :0 1 i 0 1 . 0 1 a)1 a1 l 011� II 1 isl 1 m! 111 I ao1 iaoj ieoa Iml I°" �I I N'N'a I IC4I ' !di. I i�I ' I I i �i I IN , IN ! i1l 1Ni I �I I ( � I ! ! II Il , '. l , . ! . !� II ! I I I 1zl I lI jo! i ioi 1 1oi I oI I !oI 1oi I !oI I Io1 I o I I I I i •i Q Si en IC iu1! , ;Ir11 I o le in1 1 1 • 2I 0A N1 IN N: 1 1N! Nt I tit I� I !N 1t) I I IWIy ► N. Its,' �; i of t I 10)1 of t 0)1 al l I 10)1 10)! 0)1 I 10)1 0) i IQ r, .ri Iri !�• rI r1 I ! It rl Q el 1 f NI I 'NI INI INI NI I1 IN1 .N1 INI HI I I I lw! I I '! I IQI 1 691 �I I I :�► 1 i i ! i i ! I I I I I 101110 I I ! 1 i ! 11=Ix I 01 I I°i 1 1°1 1 ;e°c)1 I I 11L 1 .irr)I I :1°n! I ,101 I tI I• ! I I I 1 QIWIch INI 1 !Ni I :N '(V1 1 NI 1 NI INI ' •N1 N1 wi 1 1 ' F'' 1rn1 ` of io! I 101 ■i ;o! o! lo! :ell I ;0 GI I C I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Z W Q INI I IcVi Ni I NI NI INI t.il 1 iCVi N_1 I I N • IN I r• i r• • Ir• r. r� I (tA! i 'fAI 691 I ' I I (11 I I eAl I I IH1 I 1 491 I •691 /fll I fAI 1 ; I ! I I ! 1 1 1 11 I 1 ' 1 I 1 I I I 1 I 1 III • 1 I I I I I I I 1 1 �' ' 1111 ; 111 ! ; 1 I ! ! , III { 11 ( 11 ..1I WI t7) 1 1 ; i 1 , I 1 i 1 1 1 I I I�ImIW IrI 1 1x1 I IrI I Iri rl i irl i Ir : Irl I IrI OI I O Z j 1 1 ! ! i I • I i i I I I N I I r:•°I_I + i l i 1 I I I ( V I I I I I I 1 Ijz1 , III ! III ! IIIIi1 1111 I e i , =I ! I li ! I I I ! < I C. ` 1111 IIIlI f 111 1 ! �! III 'al I i�I ' 1=, 1 �: CC/ llz, 1 IaI I I=1 �! 2 I 1 I , I I 1LIJi I (WI 1 !WI WI I WI IW1 w1 WI WI II 1.. f" ;I , I f�' I H 1 ' Imo. , i1-' ;I-1 1 N I I !•IZ: IZ' I .Z' . Z. Z• Z i .Z. z i Z. uU 1 I ' , i i 1 1 'WI I ILL!! ! :WI !WI ' WI IWI 11W1 ' :111; !WI I y! 1 I 'U! iUl iUi IUI I UI I UI i UI ! U I Iii! ! U, I I I I 1 WI i iw! I ;WI ' ;WI WI1 lt.U.I.M1 1WIea1 WIC !W1r11 I I 1 l 1.7Im 1-imi F..mI 1H;NI I� I t H; 1 1-, 1I-' -.11 OI I IaIY 1aI ! 1a1Y1 Ia,Y! Ia1Ul aiUl ia1Y. Ia1Ul la!YI I I , Ia.UI ia,U1 .a OI ,a,Ui 1-' la• a!0I !a, 010 ! ! '�1 0101 010 '0101 0101 O;ol 0!01 10101 ;0101 0101 61 I ; 10.1 1 !a:-11 1a:-11 ;a:-1I 1a:,11 a:-'I a:-+l 1a.-1t •a;-' la1-' 1 ice •, ..a:ml !a:lnj !a:m1 ia!mi la!oi a:m1 a1N' 'a:°,°I :Ix �1 I 1 I 1 i , 1 1 IOleo1 101x1 1010+1 !O•o! •0Ir. 01r, 0lrf i ..-t IUir1 1 NI 1 1011-! 10!1-; ;011-, UI0-! 0I�; 01�, 0!�I Qlj I �, I 1 1 ,w1 1 !WIC)! 1w101 iw101 1WIOI w1O1 1wi01 WIO, •Wi01 W101 I i 01 I '-11-11 :-1.-11 '-11-11 .-11,11 JIJI I-1IJ H1_11 •JIJI '-11-11 I . 1 I • I•1 1 . 'a: : ;a; 'a; . :a' • a. Ial 1 a a! :a, 1 I I I I I 1 f 1 10: ' 10i ! i0 01 I 0I 1 !O1 1 IEl 1 IGi 1 DI 1 1 i IZ' ! ;ZI 1 IZ, 1 Iz; I Z. I IZ I 1‹, ! !z• 1 1Z. 11 1 I I • 1 'cc ' lai I ;a' I .a' I I ial 1 aI ; I<: ; !a1 I , 1 I '0Q1 I IQI :0, !Q• 1 aI I IQI I I i I I I ;0.11 l 1WI 1 iWi !WI 1 WI I IWI 1 !WI ,W( 1 WI ! I ! j 1 I • 1 1 1 1 I I i 1 .! i 1 1 1 8 1 ' � i 1 1 1 1 I I I 1 I , 1 1 ' 1 I I I I I I j ! 1 I I ; I ! ' I I ! i ! il 111111 I II 1 I Ili I I I I ; I I j 1 1 I I I I ' I I I I 1 I I 1 1U' I it, I IQI 1 IL.; I '�! I '1,1 I !�, 1 ,U.. �. i I i 1 I I-1I t ,.•fi 1 tJ IJI I JI III I IJ! JI `I I-1i 1 i-1i JI J! -11 i Ji .4! ,-1! IJI I I I ia; ia! i 1a' I' i 1 a' J aI 1174 a' I ;a: a 1 1 int I Ina !=i I=i Mi , II, MI . Inl =i I ill 1 IQI !�1 1 .71 i �I I IQI ' Ill I '1 I ii„, I I2' 1 121 i2i ' 12; Si 1 'SI I2! 2! 1 121 11 I 121 z! Iz: !z! 1 1Z: ! ZI Z! 1 I Z I 1Z! 1 1 1 IQI 1 1a: I ,a: 'a; :cc; 1 a• I a1 12!a' I ;aI i !W1 ! ! z! 1 'WI WI ;W1 I .W, , WI I W( WI WI 1 :1-• ,I..... 1 I-' ! •1-' I I-' ! I-' I 1I-. I !I-• I '~' 1 I I 1 1-I I 1Wi I um: 1 1Wi 1 !W: 1 Cl)! 1 lWI I WI I •WI 1 IWI I : 1 I • 1 1 : I : ;�. ' ;3: • 3; I I�' i 13: ( 13. i 1! I I I i I 1 =: 1x' Ii' i 1 I II-1 I I= �: I Iii . I j �I II-1 I �' I �' 1 la! Iz: 1a: la. ! la' z' a: Ia1 la: I 1 1 1 I !01 ! 101 I OI 1 ;01 I OI I Z! 1 .01 1 101 101 1 ' I I iZI 1 z' ' Iz! ; iz: z' I I : `! i ' 1 I ' I I i ! i I l 1 1 i I I I 1 1 1 1 I ! I ! 1 I 1 1 I 1 I i ! i I I I. I I 1 I 11 , 1 . 1 ' i 1 1 I ! 1 . I , t 1 1 - 1 ! Ial I 1 Agenda Information Memo September 20, 1995 D. VACATE SIDEWALK EASEMENTS, PARK CTR ADDN ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: To close the public hearing and approve the vacation of the sidewalk easement as described over Outlot D, Park Center Addition, authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute all related documents, and approve its recording at Dakota County concurrent with the final subdivision of the Park Center 5th Addition. FACTS: • On August 15, 1995, the City Council received a petition from the developer of the proposed Park Center 5th Addition requesting the vacation of an existing sidewalk easement location along the west side of the old Rahn Road alignment. This petition was received by the Council and a public hearing was scheduled for September 20 to formally discuss the merits of this request. • All notices have been published in the legal newspaper and sent to all potentially affected utility companies, property owners, and jurisdictional agencies. As of this date, the staff has not received any objections to this request. ISSUES: • While the applicant has indicated that the easement will be rededicated and the sidewalk relocated as a part of the development of the Park Center 5th Addition(TCF), the development agreement and final subdivision process has not yet been completed. Therefore, it would be appropriate for the Council to close the public hearing and approve the vacation subject to its recording being concurrent with the final plat of the Park Center 5th Addition. ATTACHMENTS: • General location map,page i • Legal description of easements to be vacated,page 11(0 . • Sketch of easement ar to be vacated, page/%f7 . • Staff report, page :1/(fp • I li . I .I . I I II II • II I, '! h II PI1.1111"1.- 11 r _ . _ C H Cl/ 4 POND -, 2RCDN LA ILi, .c W P RK < 6 y tt. fe UIFfLEY f�U./� 6•• c rimer R PI ill , (65> p--1 R ( CORAL LA.N , 4P,Auw cr. q. _ OW) ,,,,;1/31 Z $ 'r. `' r 0. ce 4/4? 4 1SktigHH• . •P 0 rsiii • i - O A' PAT cA .4• CEDAR KV i i o x i,. , i S � " SHALE i ADOWIAN� E - �; . ,�1 ,i ,44A1,1 'ARK q p -v0__ - ____ ¢ -f C7 : _@�in• i e.]r �1 . RDA ��. } ERM1 CLFFV W I 46 Mil•Sl$��333L""" I 1 „ V •, AMO A \ RD' & 321 iR 4 FD. • �1J. �� i• �6 R WAY �— - . HLL fQ cc ,� 5� 7P11'.q'�`' i• NANCr 4I KETTL �LAx�E ' \+ !! HER d --.M. . j 4hbCAryY C E W4 C T ; < " 1 , •'•. - Qr�E . 3 EY X <a �� °� � - PAR � ', ; y, w i 3 HENNA LANE t JAAES 5 TER ( C4 RD. %f i COYTON Ilk } y/ S7. 2— • VACATION REQUEST SITE City of eagan OUTLOT D ( r approved: standard � .-. PUBLIC PARK CENTER 1st ADDITION . plate #: -d ` WORKS TRAIL VACTION REQUEST - ' $ —r DE PARTMEN ... • . . i cir • b'le 44•f Z0413 08/25/95 13:22 FAX 812 447 5048 CREATIVE GRAPHIC lit 002 I • CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY i 4 RE: PARK CENTER FIFTH ADDITION SIDEWALK EASEMENTS TO BE VACATED • Sidewalk easement dated March 30, 1984, filed June 20', 1984 as Document Number 657938, described- as follows: The west 2.0 feet of the east 35.0 feet • of the south 780.0 feet of the Southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of Section 30, Township 27, Range 23, • Dakota County, Minnesota. • Sidewalk easement reference retained by the City of Eagan in vacation of road, dated July 19, 1988, recorded August 17, 1988, as Document Number 852660, described as follows: • Commencing at the southeast corner of Section 30, Township 27, Range 23, Dakota County, Minnesota; thence North along the East of said Section 30, a distance of 544.40 feet to the point of beginning; thence: North along the East line of said Section 30, 235.60 feet, thence West 33.00 feet; thence South parallel with said section line 350.00 feet; thence Northeasterly to the point of beginning, there terminating. • SEE ATTACHED GRAPHIC -N- • • SCAI.t IN PEer • O 18 30 60 I A•r•ey certify ?Aat this 'vivo'. oleo or r•p•rt was pr.per.d by we or wader my ■ lt•st s•p•r.iaAa and tA•t 1 la • , o State• t.•• $•ivy. BOERHAVE LAND SURVEYING motor a less et tA• stars at all - ---F�l�r. - cb 7o45 14243 Mitoka Circle N.E. • E. Wa fts•.• a1.' a; • . Dues vjl� � ,�1� _ e•a. Na. 7093 .15 Prior Lake,Mm =us 612.445.9154 .( rrar I I Lam! ' • 0 . S • • A, 1 /• DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT / E 1/4, SEC. 30, TWP. 27, ROE. 2 23 - --..... V, / NORTH LINE OF TRACT AND ITS EASTERLY EXTENSION PER DOC. NO. 671333 �+� r�►� r - 226.39 - •V.4 1 �� / D� ��— 20.C , `-,��-- 491.13-�N89•d8'3B"E3SA . ,.,±;�{.��12T���� •/� (Z--tom b� N 82'97 E .:..• ^ 228.27-- in{'i. �� / — 1-H 2.00 ':i :'!� ice. 4, / 20.0 / ?� � :: -t �'►,o°' ory t"' ./ ti *... v. 8 : SEmot oyc W ::: ;: I / 0 •0�tioOI* 111.1 Z 4 / , .�::�:•,:: / . ,, Os?i 1 I / • W a N W •;. 0 ♦ •1/ Z y Z n ;3:• ca. • • QOO N� a: `/ 0i i Z WM ./ /' q 4 Z 40 , , {a.0V 4Z Ai j %� }Zg la u �A 1 '7t :ice O •O U T L O T D _PO I j 1 INDICATES EASEMENTS 3 p • 12 TO BE VACATED n a 1 -1 W i �"' on t N N I c • Nk W 40 • •1 20.0 .. C w v 5 N , ....ii • t W Y I z 3 0 N89•08'38"E I H Q a F �' 247.31 o 1 J °s z o L» a f1 31 I •"iv o N� u L.. • Q OUTLOT E _ . W I..)J o Z o V I N o, N ( w 383.00 _ �_2d4.00 _ _ ~� --_ ' ' 1 ~ N • I ' 0 1 W _ o° 33.00.i- b L. I r- r- F) 0�A L! t S 89,58138uw 1 / SW COR., SW I/4, SEC. 29 ROE. 23 — ' SE COR., SE 1/4, SEC. 30 DAK. CO. CAST IRON MONUMENT • 0 o ■ • I 7 1 1 MEMO .city of eagan TO: TOM COLBERT, PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR FROM: MIKE FOERTSCH, ASSISTANT CITY ENGINEER • DATE: SEPTEMBER 15, 1995 SUBJECT: SEPTEMBER 20, 1995 CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC HEARINGS • BELL LEXINGTON SIDEWALK EASEMENT VACATION ( PARK CENTER OUTLOT D TRAILWAYEASEMENT VACATIOI • DIFFLEY AND CEDAR FREEWAY FRONTAGE ROAD VACATION City staff has received and pr•cessed requests for the above referenced vacations. Notices were sent to parties wh h may have an interest • the proposed vacation and have identified the following issu= : • Bell Lexington Sidewalk asement V- ation-Attached is a memo from Dave Zech, of Dakota County ighway ';epartment dated August 30, 1995. The County has recommended e not vacate the easement for two reasons: 1.) The trailway cannot -e idened in the future to the State standard for a two-way bike trai •f ten -et. 2.) The area b= een the e 'sting trailway location and the building is necessary o maintain a dra age system which was required as a part of the L• e Oak Road upgra•e. Staff received,a written response from Meredith Cable, Peoples Natural Gas, Minnegasc o and Dakota Electric indicati g no concern with the vacation of the proposed trailway easement. RECOMMENDATION: Vacate only that portion of the easement which the building encroaches on. • • - . ( tIrl -- • Park Center Outlot D Trailway Easement - Staff received responses from Minnegasco, Peoples Natural Gas, Meredith Cable, Dakota Electric and Northern Natural Gas indicating no concerns with the proposed sidewalk easement vacation. The current easement document #852660 identifies retained utility, drainage, and sidewalk rights within this area. The request is to vacate the "sidewalk rights only portion of that document. The utility and drainage rights conveyed by the document need to be retained. • Diff ley and Cedar Freeway Frontage Road Vacation - City staff received responses from Dakota Electric, Northern Natural Gas and Minnegasco. Northern Natural Gas Company and Dakota Electric indicated they have no interest or concern relative tc. the proposed frontage oad vacation. Minnegasco responded to the notification, -ting they have a -xisting high pressure natural gas transmission pipeline acros a portion of e area proposed to be vacated. Please refer to the attached Augu t 31, 19•- correspondence from Minnegasco. Minnegasco is requesting that th_it e sting easement rights be maintained across that portion of the frontage • •posed for vacation. Since the property identified un• -r this v=cation request was conveyed from the State of Minnesota to the C• of Eagan or "highway purposes" by quit claim deed, the action required • ' the City is to re ' quish its rights to the property for highway purposes. Th= elease of these rig s by the City does not affect the underlining rights wh'-- Minnegasco has to the • ••erty for its existing pipeline. - In order for the •eveloper to include this property in his development plan, requires him • obtain marketable title to the property. Please refer to the attached • •gust 10, 1995 memo from the City Attorney's office. The above information identifies concerns or issues that City staff is aware of to date. If you need additional information or have any questions please advise. • PubHeermem (C, Agenda Information Memo September 20, 1995 E. VACATE SIDEWALK,TRAIL& UTILITY EASEMENTS. BELL LEXINGTON ADDITON ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: To close the public hearing, deny the vacation of sidewalk,trail, and utility easements.as described, but approve the vacation for a reduced area incorporating the footprint of the existing building only subject to staffs approval of the revised legal description. FACTS: • On August 15,the City Council received a petition from the affected property owners requesting a vacation of a portion of the sidewalk, trail, and utility easements located along the south side of Lots 1 and 2,Block 1,Bell Lexington Addition. Upon receipt of this petition,the City Council scheduled a public hearing to be held on September 20 to formally discuss the merits of this request. • All notices have been published in the legal newspaper and sent to all potentially affected property owners, utility companies, and other jurisdictional agencies. The City has received a letter of concern from Dakota County regarding this requested vacation due to the installation of improvements associated with the recent intersection upgrade and signalization of Lone Oak Road and Lexington Avenue. • While the building encroaches into the easement area by 1.57'on the west corner and 0.69'on the east corner,the applicant is petitioning the vacation of 4'across the southern edge of the building. ISSUES: • Based on the concerns expressed by Dakota County and follow-up research by City staff it would be inappropriate to vacate the petition as requested. However, favorable consideration could be given to vacating that portion of the sidewalk,trail,and utility easements encroached upon by the footprint of the existing building only. This would require a revision of the legal description and sketch which could be reviewed and approved by City staff if so directed by Council action. ATTACHMENTS: • General location map, page to. • Legal description of easements to be vacated, page 1,)44— . • Sketch of easement area requested to be vacated, page/S 3 . • Staff report, pages,,?(./ " 500 1 1 J 1 ix • I �• `.i 1 1 1 1 CORPORATEAGAN �O115T1tlAl�� ROADI � At I TER CIAVE rG'� , ' .i.r% AVALON_ VE' _ ; _ _ _ , j _ N.:. 40 -„,.. „., ,3 •.. -Y i4 KATIE ST. s, in It+ �' \ I,IeKEe ST. LEXWGT �.�•`'� V' 1011 1 - I 1 il . IR �t 4 § � . POST I I � ~104 « c 90 '• -- c0. . 8 LONE OM I10AD `I • - Fr alsVEw OR 1 APOLLO ' ROAD oWER RD. I/ X I.' id ''LSE . I 1 1 1 . 1 MUNI RD. 1 iv 11.0.1 I ......, I �.:�,� -------- + ---- --- — —I' 1 mown .4 tI I II .% I 1& i ALDRPI OR. I IE l I� I ■ 1 I g 1 _TAMARAC PT. 55121 . I I . U , - NORWAY PT. I ( I FOREST R.� '. _REDWOOD W ` 1 I I , . Q I I -_-" «. . fin.w.v�.+w�r.�r..�,•�,r +►...... __,. �•.. I� ( L I 0 0 ,-: !�'!!R!'I �� 41L,EL-: ® g5 1 �Ot*'Z N 1 RD. r'IL—J.1 :' ' CARRIAac Kra u wE- h 1 24 ' LEARY PARK , 4.9 r, O'LEA I ,o_ii VACATION REQUEST city of eagan VACATION•REQUEST approved standard • — ..: PUBLIC Lot 1, ,Block 1, Bell Lexingt n Addition plate #: i ". WORKS . 1 °c DE PARTMENL C ( . - • • DESCRIPTION TO VACATE PART OF AN UTILITY EASEMENT Part of an existing utility easement within the plat of Bell Lexington Addition, Dakota County, Minnesota, described as follows: That part, of said utility easement created by the Bell Lexington Addition plat filed March 26, 1986 in the office the County Recorder as Abstract Document No. 720399 • and duly recorded in Book Ten of Plats on Page 56, being located in the northerly four (4) feet of the southerly.ten (10) feet of the easterly ninety eight (98) feet of the westerly one hundred and thirty eight (138) feet of Lot 1, Block 1, Bell Lexington Addition; according to the recorded plat thereof. • • DESCRIPTION TO VACATE PART OF A SIDEWALK AND TRAIL_EASEMENT Part of an existing sidewalk and trail easement within the plat of Bell Lexington Addition, Dakota County, Minnesota, described as follows: That part, of said sidewalk and trail easement created and recorded as Torrens Document No. 157330 filed March 26, 1986 in the office of the Registrar of Titles and as Abstract Document No. 720401 filed March 26, 1986 in the office of the County Recorder, being located in the northerly four (4) feet of the southerly ten (10) feet of the easterly ninety eight (98) feet of the westerly one hundred and thirty eight • (138) feet of Lot 1, Block 1, Bell Lexington Addition; according to the recorded plat thereof. • • 19046.02000%14132 i ,IT i :471111 , 97.23 1 • �n/ • 6 qff IA Q N \s, E 1 STORY BRICK 1 � i NO. 2990 0 ce 1"11.D. � O to -;.Z.1 r. v3 2 lig T-A iv CI--cr t •.. § 8 1 i o2 i:- . c tSa o8 c O �t. c 2a••70.c W \ma ���,, :l PART OF EASEMENT I ° lA' : i TO BE VACATED 1 -,to 3 , L ° rte) 50 m 10 ,ETUMP 41 y G tv . , a:`55 c.� ,o NI tq 1. . 25.10V 69.16 Ogg 415.5 - t' . 4'i -■:is�*��.;r=_ AEM ffi '.TM aaMMM 7L b 4' -, :::t.. = 't:*% ... .. _._, . :. . 9¢f.. 1381 D 348.95 , TRAIL LOCATION N89'29'00 in In • • .S.AJL NO. 26 ('LONE i___ ..... .,. - _ ... ..s. .• % ...�.DAKOTA COUNTY CAST IRON MONUMENT (FOUND) S.W. CORNER OF SEC. 2, TWP. 27, RGE. 23 %----SOUTH LINE DrscfarioN TO VACATE F'AR'E OF AN V!!Y+'FACPn7a1T Disaurnori TO VACATE PAST 0T A SIDFWYALK AND TtAIL EASEMENT Part of an eahtlne milky mum=within the Ow at fell Le1lopoa Addition.Dakota Pan o f a Ml sidewalk described easement within DER plat of Dell tsxlttwo Addition, • Cower/.MWoewu,deaeni eel u follows That pert.of said utUlry easement comae by the fell L ntntmo Addoloo plat filed That part.of said sidewalk and trail anentare erased sod recorded u Torten Much 26.l9Mr in U(With the County Manta as Abstract Document No.720399 Docuneat No.157330 Mod March 26,1916 in lbs office of the Replan:of Tides and duly monad in Book Tea of Plan oa Pap 56,berg famed in the oortheriy and at Abstract Dactwua No.720401 filed March 26.1966 an We office of Ur fury(4)feu of tM southerly tea eight f 31 t feat ter 1.BIaeks4 tleu61 few the fleeoeder,Ming l e (VS)the eorth1tly (4) of the ten`1101 sod thirty smarmy es brodtad sod thirty 1 ( ) Addition: (1311)Rd of Pat t.Loch 1,fell 1aaitrerat Addition: l oordenj to the tesetded plat tiered. aawedia j a the reeseded plat dated. • .33 . • • MEMO _city of eagan TO: TOM COLBERT, PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR FROM: • MIKE FOERTSCH, ASSISTANT CITY ENGINEER • DATE: SEPTEMBER 15, 1995 SUBJECT: SEPTEMBER 20, 1995 CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC HEARINGS • BELL. LEXINGTON SIDEWALK EASEMENT VACATION • PARK CENTER OUTLOT D TRAILWAY EASEMENT VACATION • • DIFFLEY AND CEDAR FREEWAY FRONTAGE ROAD VACATION City staff has received and processed requests for the above referenced vacations. Notices were sent to parties which may have an interest in the proposed vacation and have identified the following issues: • Bell Lexington Sidewalk Easement Vacation-Attached is a memo from Dave Zech, of Dakota County Highway Department dated August 30, 1995. The County has recommended the City not vacate the easement for two reasons: 1.) The trailway cannot be widened in the future to the State standard for a two-way bike trail of ten feet. 2.) The area between the existing trailway location and the building is necessary to maintain a drainage system which was required as a part of the Lone Oak Road upgrade. Staff received a written response from Meredith Cable, Peoples Natural Gas, Minnegasco and Dakota Electric indicating no concern with the vacation of the proposed trailway easement. RECOMMENDATION: Vacate only that portion of the easement which the building encroaches on. /5. 1 i 1 1 III I I • I - l • _ DAKOTA COUNTY pACOuNTYiENGINEER O P.E. (612►t391-%100• ��LA ey�� HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT Fax(612)8914127 • �`i. I 14955 GALAXIE AVENUE.3RD FLOOR APPLE VALLEY.ty11NNFS(�Tn 5512A 857-0 I FO.::)t::17, ,e4. ) -1,"V1•: l • R August 30, 1995 To: Tom Colbert, Eagan Public Works Director From: Dave Zech, Dakota County Highway Design Engineer Subject: Walk Easement Vacation on Crate Prospects' Property Dakota County staff has reviewed the proposed vacation of 4 feet of walk easement by the City, and I am sending a few comments. The trail constructed south of the Crate Prospects' building is 8 feet wide. The proposed desirable State standard for a two-way bike trail is 10 feet of width. The trail could not be widened to the desirable standard in the future, if 4 feet of easement is vacated, without purchasing an easement from Crate Prospects. There is a rock and tile drainage system between the trail and Crate Prospects' building. The drainage system abuts the building foundation and is currently on the City's walk easement. If 4 feet of easement is vacated, the drainage system will be on private property and cannot be maintained by the City. It is necessary to keep the easement for access to this area for proper maintenance. • t221lITC, Pr181Etl on r.Cy01.a WPer.20%pos: oAsum:r `I+• AN EQUAL OP ORTUNITY EMPLOYER 200 'N17 'AN3S 1•WaLSS�1-A1NrIOD d10 Q .57 Sb' S6/02i80 I- Agenda Information Memo September 20, 1995 F. VACATE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY.CEDAR FREEWAY FRONTAGE RD ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: To close the public hearing and approve the vacation of public right-of-way and conveyance of City rights via the Quit Claim process and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute all related documents. FACTS: • • On July 11, the City Council received a petition from the developers of the proposed Eagan Heights Addition(formally Splashland)requesting the City to vacate a portion of excess right-of- way turned back to the City from MnDOT after the construction of the Cedar Freeway. This excess right-of-way incorporates the frontage road north of Diffley Road on the east side of the Cedar Freeway that was installed to service the landlocked parcel that is being incorporated into the Eagan Heights Addition development. • The public hearing was held on August 19 to formally discuss and consider this petition. However,due to a technical error in the legal description, it was continued to the September 20 meeting. • During the interim,it has been determined that the City cannot formally vacate this excess public right-of-way previously acquired by MnDOT,but can only Quit Claim away its rights and interest back to MnDOT from whom the property owner can pursue formal vacations, releases, and/or repurchasing from MnDOT directly. However, since the public hearing was formally noticed and advertised,it would be appropriate for the City Council to open and close the public hearing and take the appropriate action. • Through a series of public notification, City staff has not received any objections to our vacation and/or release of rights through the Quit Claim process. ATTACHMENTS: • General location map, page. 7 . • Legal description and graphic of etitioned vacation,pages('$n "1. (6'.O • Staff report, pages/(, f&s J K 11 11 11 ;1 • 11 .1 . Ir ,; • ` - -• �1. _ \ - r . ,7- -V • I A ..Azn ,......... . . e SBUU ' \ �:A.AR BELL SL VCR BELL ;� Wn i C. .'74 N u. • z n -;.-t s , 1 Iwo- 40 . r 'j YD. ,--,-- a / 69 9.4'' W\--1414AOODH A V EN .13: a I 7:y0i <5.91-p PARK .400 4000 I y/ ' F ��� il q � ACONI W. Qa , P. r V ~EY r, 1 1 " 4 q 07011% . & ) .0 S E- A EME�� �JAOC'�If ,- 3 W � 1' g \t aD'It 4 .cr. o , , I lk 4-, ao�f I MU : FT 1 : EDARI ' �• ( r t Ic POND IRCON LA.' ti W C1• IIII " 6 - 1. sArti■ - 420 - DIFFLEY RD. sP RK 3 - �,.` C_ orncr I6N V --I • ` ( CORAL LA.iL Cf• -. ---7. : .0-4 :4 3 v L., , al, ID 1tc1; RIVER g 1 �, •HILLS 1 4 �. p Q PARK �' v ' 3 o _ �• `��CEOAR OCS • o. f t � ir���L �� - CR� SHALE = LANE q■ ADOWL r 4400 12auc W t�:f1 ARK 1.Q :..:._ 7 0 �j w ■ + r . } s 8 . / it0 1 l • • VACTION REQUEST SITE • '— - — — - - _ r city,of eagan EXCESS MINN. D.O.T. RIGHT OF WAY approved plate acrd E .;.• PUBLIC DIFFLEY AND CEDAR FREEWAY $I WORKS FRONTAGE ROAD I , ` DEPARTMENT . ( 5 7 • • Parcel C: • That part of the Southwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section 19, : .: Township 27 North, Range 23 West of the 4th Principal Meridian, Dakota %r_ = County, Minnesota, desc.gybed as follows: Commencing at the southwest corner of said Southwest Quarter of Section 19; thence on an, assumed bearing of North 89 degrees 5.3 minutes 52 seconds East, along the south line of. said Southwest Quarter a distance of 807.09 feet to a ;point on the southerly extension of a right—of—way line of Parcel 216A, designated as 8531 per MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT RIGHT OF WAY PLAT NO. 19-5, recorded as Document No. 480494 Dakota County, Minnesota; . • thence North 00 degrees 06 minutes 08 seconds West along said extension a distance of 50.00 feet; thence continuing North 00 degrees 06 minutes 08 seconds West along said right—of—way a distance of 150.00 feet to a point designated on said plat as 832; thence North 89 degrees 53 minutes 52 seconds East along said rignt—of-•way, a distance of 228.30 feet to a point designated on said plat as 833; thence North 44 degrees 52 minutes 40 seconds East along said • right—of—way a distance of 166.12 feet and the point of beginning of the land to be described; .thence continuing North 44 degrees 52 minutes 40 seconds East along said right—of—way of 17.79 feet to a point designated on said plat as 834; thence North 00 degrees 08 minutes 33 seconds West along said right—of—way a distance of 131.02 feet to a point designated on said plat as 835; thence North 89 degrees 51 minutes 27 seconds East along said right- of—way, a distance of 200 feet to a point designated on said plat as 836; thence South 41; degrees 28 minutes 01 seconds West a distance of 188.61 feet; thence southwesterly a distance of 189.13 feet along a curve concave to the northwest and not tangent with the last described line, said curve has a radius of 205.00 feet, a central angle at 52 degrees 51 minutes 38 seconds and the chord of said curve bears South 29 degrees 05 minutes 04 seconds West. to a point on a line that bears South 00 degrees 30 minutes 18 seconds West from said point of beginning; thence North 00 degrees 30 minutes 18 seconds East a distance of 156.70 feet to said point of beginning. • • ( • - Parcel D: / That part of the Southwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section 19, Township 27 North, Range 23 West of the 4th Principal Meridian, Dakota /di County. Minnesota, described as follows: Commencing at the southwest corner of said Southwest Quarter of Section 19; thence on on assumed bearing of North 89 degrees 53 minutes 52 seconds East, along the south line of said Southwest Quarter a distance of 807.09 feet to a point on the southerly extension of a tight—of—way line of Parcel 216A, designated as 8531 per MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT RIGHT OF WAY PLAT NO. 19-5, recorded as Document No. 480494 Dakota County, Minnesota; thence North 00 degrees 06 minutes uti seconds West along saui extension a distance of 50.00 feet to the point of beginning of the land to be described; thence continuing North 00 degrees 06 minutes 08 seconds West along said right—of—way a distance of 150.00 feet to a point designated on said plat as 832; thence North 89 degrees 53 minutes 52 seconds East along said right-of--way, a distance of 228.30 feet to a point designated on said plat as 833; thence North 44 degrees 52 minutes 40 seconds East along said right—of—way a distance of 166.12 feet; thence South 00 degrees 30 minutes 18 seconds West a distance of 156.70 feet; thence southwesterly a distance of 123.02 feet along a non—tangential curve concave to the northwest having a radius of 205.00 feet a central angle of 34 degrees 22 minutes 59 seconds, and a chord bearing of South 72 degrees 42 minutes 23 seconds West; thence South 89 degrees 53 minutes 52 seconds West, not tangent t said . curve, a distance of 103.30 feet thence South 18 degrees 57 minutes 24 seconds West a distance of 79.35 feet to a line parallel with and 50.00 fe t north of said south line of the Southwest Quarter; thence South 89 degrees 53.minutes 52 seconds West, along said parallel line, a distance of 99.08 feet to said point of beginning. • 5•1" . _ — y-t 4.- ,, ,... 44%7A1. mr 04( % ..---------"e\ 0/40,* -Ps C9 • 4:kiN \ s-, . ..-).1, \ 4/). V \ \• 14,0 / 4 es, . . A‘ \ 4*,11, 1,p fr •• 0 47■0 NO / to 44"‹ \ . 0 ilso 1/4 / "1r / \Itt4i.*‘,..._.. • , slee / • . /00O =8 \\/) • 0,‘ . titfc' - ---• :;:a". '"Airbii••is_ "0.re, ,er •1 a, ,\c. ,g.f.--...====usIntt ....... • r ... (.!..sitg,„,21ext-a_mtakttr .r... .v4m._ • M .t0,9Z.VP s -- .44..'"41 " ."41141 •■•■ .M aZO,Se.tir S •••--..., .. •'99 t .uIIIIIIIMMINIIIIIIIIIIN—.=mr:=7., ■imrxm,■.._ .-.:. .c.-_ •_ ... ....._"t.r-AAIMIP• NEN,.441?qp. 47nIr -,=■• ..... •• . - Ir--''i=i - ., ••• NOM. Terbi, .... . • ! .... ii. - .47:0—:::■!", 46b° • . . <61; ,61114 > ,9Re ....... - sow „.. ::: . jo. • ... + d* S_ iliail\ O S e r ..dinr .0tMiir s -- • / ....I. 4. 4),.., •on N., m.k ,•., ...—,. .:.. ....s:, :'.fier..-ti:,:_i?:..1.4.,.._ ... • ..; / % -4. - ... La-::..„ &- . ues.• • :... • ■- 8 ".. ....., Stg;:ttr-jw1143:••\ N,, Nr, ,.. "" v.,. . - .. ••• , • .., „,,,,,, • - 4$5 . ..•••••.,:kqt$,:. fe N'y *. - ,,„....t.... .:• , .4, o / (...-- V AIL _.1■111M,Sd . ' 4.06‘ r lb 4.* _.., ,, •0,4... et,,,—__I-J, , ....■•._ i Am& .—.144:44Tp/ , ,...s— ' -____ - ...' 44tr,& Nagivitttster / / to, i'r V4,,o _, ' vttarttur / /4 N44‘ 4%.r• '-`- kt --9' 'sr \\ / • ,./r . 4%A._ --- .12. ,,,, . _ / / -‘43.051. e • IWO' \ . , VT / .. / . / / ##.# ..64k Ck• -‘' S / • 4% C.t... 40 / • . , . • 0()if kr \\j‘1%••9) . , . . • L. MEMO ._city of eagan TO: TOM COLBERT, PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR FROM: MIKE FOERTSCH, ASSISTANT CITY ENGINEER „4., DATE: SEPTEMBER 15, 1995 SUBJECT: SEPTEMBER 20, 1995 CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC HEARINGS • BELL LEXINGTON SIDEWALK EASEMENT VACATION • PARK CENTER OUTLOT D ?RAILWAY EASEMENT VACATION DIFFLEY AND CEDAR FREEWAY FRONTAGE ROAD VACATION City staff has received and processed requests for the above referenced vacations. Notices were sent to parties which may have an interest in the proposed vacation and have identified the following issues: • Bell Lexington Sidewalk Easement V- •ation-Attached is a memo from Dave Zech, of Dakota e•unty Highway D partment dated August 30, 1995. The County has recomm=nded the Cit not vacate the easement for two reasons: 1.) The trailway can •t be idened in the future to the State standard for a two-way bike trail ,•f -n feet. 2.) The area betw=-n ,e existing trailway location and the building is necessary to •aintain = drainage system which was required as a part of the Lone %ak Road 'grade. Staff received - written response rom Meredith Cable, Peoples Natural Gas, Minnegasco - d Dakota Electric in•' -ting no concern with the vacation of the proposed =ilway easement. RECOMMENDATION: Vacate only that portion of the easement which the building encroaches on. • Park C nter Outlot D T -ilway ,sement - Staff received responses from Minnegasco, Peoples N- ral r as, Meredith Cable, Dakota Electric and Northern Natural Gas indi•-ti'g no concerns with the proposed sidewalk easement vacation. The ent easement document #852660 identifies retained utility, drainage, and i•-walk rights within this area. The request is to vacate the "sidewalk rig on portion of that document. The utility and drainage rights conveye- by the • •cument need to be retained. • Diffley and Cedar Freeway Frontage Road Vacation - City staff received responses from Dakota Electric, Northern Natural Gas and Minnegasco. Northern Natural Gas Company and Dakota Electric indicated they have no interest or concern relative to the proposed frontage road vacation. Minnegasco responded to the notification stating they have an existing high pressure natural gas transmission pipeline across a portion of the area proposed to be vacated. Please refer to the attached August 31, 1995 correspondence from Minnegasco. Minnegasco is requesting that their existing easement rights be maintained across that portion of the frontage proposed for vacation. Since the property identified under this vacation request was conveyed from the State of Minnesota to the City of Eagan for "highway purposes" by quit claim deed, the action required by the City is to relinquish its rights to the property for highway purposes. The release of these rights by the City does not affect the underlining rights which Minnegasco has to the property for its existing pipeline. In order for the developer to include this property in his development plan, requires him to obtain marketable title to the property. Please refer to the attached August 10, 1995 memo from the City Attorney's office. . The above information identifies concerns or issues that City staff is aware of to date. If you need additional information or have any questions please advise. • PubH..r ram • city of acigcin August 21, 1995 THOMAS EGAN Mayor r. . ` C i✓ J PATRICIA AWADA SHAWN SANDRA HA.NMASIN THEODORE WACHTER Council Members THOMAS HEDGES City Administrator E.J. VAN OVERBEKE City Clerk Re: Notification of Public Hearing to Vacate Public Easement/Right-of-Way Difftey &Cedar Freeway Frontage Road The City of Eagan has received a request to vacate public easements/right-of-way as shown and described on the attached graphic. A public hearing is scheduled to be held at 7:00 p.m. on September 19, 1995, at the Eagan Municipal Center located at 3830 Pilot Knob • Road to hear any comments or concerns. If you have any questions pertaining to this vacation, please contact the Engineering Department at 681-4646. Please check one of the boxes below and return by September 1, 1995. Thank you. ❑ !/we have no interest or concern in this vacation proceeding. We have a concern and would like to address it at the public hearing. (Please submit concern in writing along with this notification.) " � h 11 _ t Company Agency Michael P. Foertsch,.. E./L'.S. c` / , j Assistant City Engineer Name MPF/jj Title Enclosure: Graphic • VACATION DISC MUNICIPAL CENTER MAINTENANCE FACILITY 3830 PILOT KNOB ROAD THE LONE OAK TREE 3501 COACHMAN POINT FAGAN.MINNESOTA 55122 1897 THE SYMBOL OF STRENGTH AND GROWTH IN OUR COMMUNITY EAGAN.MINNESOTA 55122 PHONE:(612)681-4600 PHONE:(612)681.4300 FAX:(612)681.4612 Equal OpportunIty/AffIrmatIve Action Employer FAX:(612)681-4360 TDD:(612)454.8535 TDD:(612)454.8535 !nne • M asco.g A MORAN.ENERGY COMPANY RECEIVED SEP 0 1 1995 August 31, 1995 _ Michael P. Foertsch, Assistant City Engineer City of Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN. 55122-1897 RE: Street vacation at Diffley & Cedar Frontage Road D ar Mr. Foertsch:' With reference to the proposed street vacation mentioned above, Minnegasco does have an existing high pressure natural gas transmission pipeline. in that portion of Parcel "D" proposed to b vacated. The easement for this transmission line was executed on July 20, • 1939 and filed with the Dakota County Recorder on August 26, 1939 in Book 204 of Deeds on page 463. The easement was reduced to an 80-foot strip by Modification and Amendment of Easement Grant dated March 8, 1972, ' recorded April 10, 1972 as document number 396996, and was assigned to Minnegasco according to document number 717470. Since this transmission pipeline supplies natural gas to most of th southern metro area, easement: rights must be maintained. Th refore, Minnegasco, a division of NorAm Energy Corp. , 'a Delaware, corporation, requests that: The above easement be referenced and included within the document establishing the street vacation and filed with the Dakota County Recorders office. Thank you for the advance notice and please send me a copy of the final action on this proposed vacation. Sincerely, Steven Von Bergen Real Estate Specialist Minnegasco pc: R. J. Pilon, Minnegasco Ron Wilson, Minnegasco 7011 1%'est[mien avenue P. /b "1.i O,Box ll(i5 i •_ . . • RFCFryFC AUG ! 71995 To: TOM COLBERT, DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS From: BOB BAUER,ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY MEMORANDUM ; Subject SUBSEQUENT CONVEYANCE OF PROPERTY RECEIVED FROM THE'STATE OF MINNESOTA FOR HIGHWAY PURPOSES Date: August 10, 1995 M issue has been presented by a developer as to whether the City of Eagan may convey to the developer a portion of property that the City acquired from the State of Minnesota. For background purposes,the City of Eagan acquired a portion of property near Diffley Road and Cedar Avenue from the State of Minnesota in 1989.The conveyance was made pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 161.16, Subd. 4,which allows the State to convey existing roads that are no longer used for trunk highway purposes to a municipality for highway purposes.The Deed that the City of Eagan received from the State of Minnesota contains a restriction clause in which states that the City of Eagan is to use the property for highway purposes.This restriction is required to be placed in the Deed according to the above statute. I contacted an attorney with the Minnesota Department of Transportation to determine the State's position with regard to any subsequent conveyance. Donald Goedken, an attorney for the Department of Transportation, indicated that the State of Minnesota would have no objection to a conveyance by the City to the developer. However,the other issue present is whether the developer acquires marketable title to the property. Mr. Goedken indicated that based on prior practices where such conveyances have occurred,the entity or individual who acquires the property would then be required to bring a quiet title action or an action to register title to the property.The entity or individual would need to name the State as a Defendant in the action and the State will routinely not oppose the action. In light of this information,the City of Eagan can execute a Quit Claim Deed to the developer, however, if the developer desires to include this property in its development plan,the City should require the developer to quiet title to the property or pursue a title registration proceeding. cc Michael G. Dougherty, City Attorney • • • I( J Agenda Information Memo September 20, 1995 Eagan City Council Meeting G. VARIANCE - ROBERT J. ROL ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: • To approve or deny a Variance for Robert J. Rol of 3' to the required 10' side yard setback for Lot 7, Block 2, Brittany Addition, located at 1639 Norwood Drive east of Johnny Cake Ridge Road. FACTS: • Mr. Rol would like to convert an existing deck at the northwest corner of his dwelling unit. The deck is located 7' from the lot line; Code requires a 10' side yard setback for • living space. • The severe grade associated with this lot made it necessary to shift the dwelling unit and attached garage 5' to the west. Granting a 3' Variance would result in a total encroachment of 24 sq. ft. into the IQ' setback area and would allow the home to be • completed according to its original plan for a three-season porch where the deck exists. BACKGROUND/ATTACHMENTS: (1) Staff Report, pages i (?through '7z /LPL _ PLANNING REPORT CITY OF EAGAN REPORT DATE: September 8, 1995 CASE #: 33-V-15-9-95 APPLICANT: Robert J. Rol HEARING DATE: 9-20-95 PROPERTY OWNER: Robert J. Rol PREPARED BY: Erik Slettedahl REQUEST: Variance (side-yard setback) LOCATION: 1639 Norwood Drive Lot 7, Block 2, Brittany Addition COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: D-1 (Single Family Residential 0-3 units/acre) • ZONING: R-1 (Single Family Residential) SUMMARY OF REQUEST The applicant has requested a three foot variance to the required ten foot side-yard setback for Lot 7, Block 2, Brittany 1st Addition (10-15000-070-02) located in the SW 1/4 of Section 33. AUTHORITY FOR REVIEW Section 11.40, Subd. 3, C., states: 1. If the Council shall determine that the special conditions applying to the structures or land in question are peculiar to such property or immediately adjoining property and do not apply generally to other land or structures in the district in which said land is located, and that the granting of the application is necessary for the applicant. 2. That the granting of the proposed variance will not be contrary to the intent of this Chapter and the Comprehensive Guide Plan. 3. The granting of such variance will not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant,but is necessary to alleviate demonstrable hardship or difficulty. CODE REQUIREMENTS City Code Section 11.20, Subdivision 6., A. requires a ten foot side-yard setback for a dwelling unit and a five foot side-yard setback for any permitted accessory structure in single family residential districts. An enclosed structure used as living space is considered part of the dwelling unit and must meet the required ten foot side-yard setback. - • . co BACKGROUND The Brittany Addition was granted final plat approval on August 10, 1979. According to the applicant,the home located on the subject lot was originally designed to have an octagon shaped, three season porch attached to the dwelling unit. This was deleted from the approved plan, yet structural accommodations were made to add the three season porch later. In addition, the applicant stated that the dwelling unit and attached garage were moved so that the garage was located ten feet from the east property line to provide access for building equipment. On September 21, 1994 a building permit was approved for an octagon shaped deck at the northwest corner of the property. At that time, the applicant was told he would need a variance to the side- yard setback if the deck was to be covered/enclosed. EXISTING CONDITIQ,j Several lots in Block 2 of the Brittany Addition have severe grade changes from front to back. The subject lot drops approximately forty feet from the northwest corner of the dwelling unit to the pond at the rear of the property. The 2,308 square foot dwelling unit and attached garage were built in 1985 and located ten feet from both side lot-lines. The octagon shaped deck attached to the northwest corner of the home extends to a point no less than seven feet from the west side lot-line. The deck, roof line, and northwest corner of the dwelling unit appear to be unfinished as they currently exist. EVALUATIQN OF REQUEST The applicant is proposing to enclose the deck to conform to the original design of the home. The proposed enclosure would not extend any farther than three feet within the required ten foot side-yard setback and the intrusion into the setback area would be limited to 24 square feet. The applicant believes the hardship is that the severe grade and a neighbor's retaining wall on the west side of the subject lot made it necessary to use the east side of the home for equipment access. This access required the house to be located five feet further to the west than originally planned. According to the applicant, the roof line and footings necessary to accommodate the enclosed deck were approved with the building permit. SUMMARY/CONCLUSION The applicant is requesting a three foot variance to the ten foot side-yard setback for Lot 7,Block 2,Brittany Addition to enclose an existing deck at the northwest corner of the dwelling unit. The severe grade associated with this lot made it necessary to shift the dwelling unit and attached garage five feet to the west. The variance would result in a total encroachment of 24 square feet • into the ten foot setback area and would allow the home to be completed according to its original plan. ( ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED To approve/deny a three foot variance to the required ten foot side-yard setback for Lot 7, Block 2, Brittany Addition. A. PI) ce SIGFRID L F 3 "' i IE- `�,. CLEMSON Ep — T. CIR I tr> WEFOR• � O B Y I { EOME c �' cam``` A A/ OODGE __ PON :RO A CAN ASEiA • r a c • -GREE ST, I`AMARYI1 •RA • 11 'T V 6 9 PAR .QQ.. '� LA. • I- • - i �`,y ' ,i,-: - :i•..' .j,j. 1�•,,z.'- -',... �y '4l,N''A.l, :2.:.i...!•::. ° i i •. i� o°� , r• • " MHO • 1'1 3 ,000,0G c I I %;Js=.':.:, .["ARK;F :.: i .r E` • A5 :: •:THOMAS �� -. . g5.1101°. r �. I :, 4 3 V ORY ��. I ,�• mo a• _ cox) zer .QP: •itt'....) _t, I •' •< . • mil .0, , cr,,, ROAD A T C °'I - NOKIA ' '�' ( WAY c = •CO `LANCASTE: 353 RJR , 3 I. T- TON H S '1 Lar 71TV(Plit`1/4( o B WALDEN JO0, 74.` .t i a ;; gyp• IaJ ILA' HEIGHTS < >° NU2.',`l Q. G C: a :, a PARK ..1 ....1 s ( - ,•I DELORES • �h . I I I coy , . LN• O4. µ a o v a fI `'i` J i .,,,cji ::::::;:s.. .0 6 !Eli 0 . < ■g g A *I ' 2 I .Cr A r mW • • N. �'�" 3 RIDGECLIFF PARK 'cc . _ • °• - � ' t2.- SALEM PT. • - �. - - �c SCE 13.- ,IAacsTOPE PT. g u O- • CIR. I WELLINGTON I 14.— IAN= PT. :Z I L., I WAY ! - 1S- TitAVERSE PT. d • _ . WELL. ta- soRa. Pr. A SEER. 8 . �j. 17.- NRTA PT. < 1a- LITA PT. V RW rip W A Y - I 19.- NIATEN PT. . ' • CA 20.- STAVEAN PT. )- I ." ., i ..21.— ALTA PT. , . S o , • ,I EG�oNPL I 63 ' . .; A • ... .., . . ,. p WI)I • • ■ - . LOCATION - (( 13 - -, „ i 1 I-I it I I i 1 1 .;•••••• ....... •... ...\\- ,,. . \b,.. \ ..k.., ,\.. w 1 .114\ • A A ' ■ \\- 1 .4.4_ \ \ It • kIkk P7- . :',6.` . \%, 001-4A i . • . . ,. _.. . ,i. : ,... . ,- ., . - \\ , , . • . . ... • ..:. 1.1..:. \ %. . \ \r. . .\ al .. . co. , . ... :,,, ' Illr, ,.. k ' - • €N1 . . .. . ' ' ''. .' . b %. ":140%.. Ar4 . . . .., . . . .. ilitiv..‘it .3; . .16, i . .. .... . .. . . . : -,,, „ ,,,,, P., SUBJECT LOT N• . . I Ni"'■ \, 9.. tt).0 M / 11111 ( ka .- � �Da• ,t , �1�� 1�4\ 110 . . . ....- .. ... ,sr) 044 ' , • . .• s 14,"" .%'' l i 1 k :II° 1 . • Ikk‘ i‘1 ill \\w %:ga ' t t 1 • . •&..1.. .:Z. ..". 1 . ' 4 ) i 1 1 - ■ _MM•1•• ■ r11■1■D -_ . / DRAINAGE EASEMENT 1 i i 1 [ EXISTING DECK T . T C - , 1,518 SQ. FT. DWELLING UNIT ■ 6_.' . • , [ ' I II • . 780 SQ. FT. GARAGE -10'--' • . 1 I1 Agenda Information Memo September 20, 1995 Eagan City Council Meeting H. MOVING PERMIT&VARIANCE-EAGAN EVANGELICAL COVENANT CHURCH ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: • To approve a moving permit for Eagan Evangelical Covenant Church to move a barn onto their property from the Soderholm Addition and to waive the cash escrow requirements, as well as the maximum 90-day time period allowed for remodeling. • To approve or deny a 38'Variance to the required 60' setback for the barn in its relocated position on Lot 1, Block 1, Eagan Evangelical Covenant Church Addition. FACTS: • The Eagan Evangelical Covenant Church is proposing to move a 1,920 sq. ft. barn from the adjacent Soderholm property and place it in the 70' of open space between the church's parking lot and its south property line. The church plans to upgrade the barn over time and utilize it as a youth center. • The church is requesting a waiver from Section 4.10 requirements for the cash deposit regarding abandoning the well on the Soderholm property because this will be taken care of as part of the Soderholm Planned Development. • • The church is requesting a waiver Of the cash deposit to insure conformance with applicable building code requirements. • The church is also requesting that the 90-day restriction on completing all remodeling, additions,and repairs be waived since the church is planning to redo the building over time. • Approval of this moving permit will also require a waiver of Section 4.10, Subd. 13G of Chapter 4 that prohibits relocating a structure that will be ten years older than the oldest existing abutting structure. • Regarding the Variance, City Code requires a 2' setback for every 1' in height in the Public Facility zoning district. The barn is 30' tall which requires a 60' setback. The church is requesting a Variance of 38' from the south boundary line. BACKGROUND/ATTACHMENTS: (2) Staff Report, paged"ti through h /$( Letter from applicant, pages f'l througha.L • • 1 • 1 J 1 PLANNING REPORT CITY OF EAGAN REPORT DATE: September 14, 1995 CASE: 23-V-14-9-95 APPLICANT: Eagan Covenant Church HEARING DATE: September 20, 1995 PROPERTY OWNER: Eagan Covenant Church PREPARED BY: Scott Harlicker REQUEST: Moving Permit, Variance (setback) LOCATION: 4100 Lexington Way COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: PF (Public Facility) ZONING: PF (Public Facility) - SUMMARY OF REOUEST The applicant is requesting approval of a Moving Permit to relocate a barn from the northeast corner of Diffley Road and Lexington Way to Lot 1, Block 1, Eagan Evangelical Covenant Church Addition and a 38 foot Variance to the required 60 foot setback for the barn in its relocated position. The Eagan Evangelical Covenant Church is located at the northeastern end of the Lexington Way cul-de-sac in the SW 1/4 of Section 23 • AUTHORITY FOR REVIEW Moving Permits-City Code Chapter 4, Section 4.10,provides the Protective Inspections Division authority to issue permits to move a building and authority to the City Council to issue a permit to move a building to a location within the City. City Code Chapter 4, Section 4.10, Subd. 13 states that a moving permit shall be denied for any one of the following reasons: A. The applicant has not complied with any,requirement of this Section; B. Persons or property in the City would be endangered by moving the building; C. The building is in such state of deterioration or disrepair or is otherwise so structurally unsafe that it would constitute a danger to persons or property in the City; D. The building is structurally unsafe or unfit for the purpose for which it is moved: °°"? Eagan Covenant Church September 20, 1995 Page 2 E. The equipment for moving is unsafe and persons and property would be endangered by its use; F. The building or its use would not be in compliance with zoning, building codes or other provisions of the City Code; G. If the building to be moved is in substantial variance with either the established or the expected pattern of building development within the neighborhood to which the building is to be moved. Comparative age, bulk, architectural style and quality of construction of both the building to be moved and the other buildings in the neighborhood shall be considered in determining whether a building is in substantial variance. If the building to be moved is more than 10 years older then the oldest building situated on lands abutting the land to which the building is to be moved, such fact shall be evidence that the building to be moved is in substantial variance. • Variances - City Code Chapter 11, Section 11.40, Subd. 3, C states: 1. If the Council shall determine that the special conditions applying to the structures or land in question are peculiar to such property or immediately adjoining property and do not apply generally to other land or structures in the district in which said land is located, and that the granting of the application is necessary for the applicant. 2. The granting of the proposed variance will not be contrary to the intent of this Chapter and the Comprehensive Guide Plan. 3. That granting of such variance will not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate demonstrable hardship or difficulty. BACKGROUND/HISTORY Lot 1, Block 1, the Eagan Evangelical Covenant Church Addition received final plat approval on October 17, 1989. The subject lot was issued a building permit for the church in 1989. EXISTING CONDITIONS The subject lot is 4.84 acres in size and contains an 8,500 square foot church and an 87 space parking lot. The portion of the lot that is not developed is mostly grassland. The current access from Lexington Avenue is temporary until a permanent access is provided through the ' development of the Soderholm property to the south. According to condition #8 of the Development Contract entered into between the City of Eagan and the Eagan Evangelical Covenant Church, the temporary parking lot improvements must be brought into conformance with the current City Code by October 17, 1996. • 7 ' • • Eagan Covenant Church September 20, 1995 Page 3 EVALUATION OF REOUEST Moving Permit - The church is proposing to move a 1,920 square foot ( 32' x 60' ) barn from the adjacent Soderholm Property to the south, and place it in the 70 feet of open space between the church parking lot and their south property line. The proposed side yard setback is 22 feet. The church is intending to use the barn as a youth center. The Protective Inspections Division has reviewed the material submitted as part of the application, and has determined that the church request is in conformance with City Code requirements. The placement of the barn on the property should not require the need for additional parking spaces because the use of the barn as a youth center will not conflict with the use of the parking lot for church services. The church is requesting a waiver to Section 4.10, Subd. 4.B.4. which requires a cash deposit from the owner of the lot from which the building is to be removed in the sum of$2,000 as an indemnity to ensure that the well will be capped, the sewer system will be abandoned, all excavations will be filled to grade, removal of all rubbish, and leaving the site in a safe and sanitary condition. The provisions of Subdivision 4 will be met as part of the Soderholm Planned Development. The church is requesting a waiver to Section 4.10, Subd. 4.B.5. which requires a cash deposit or a letter of credit in the amount of 75%of the estimated cost, as determined by the City,to bring the building into conformance with applicable Building Code requirements. The City has some control to ensure that the barn will be brought into compliance because a C.O. for the barn will not be issued, and the barn can not be occupied, until it is brought into compliance with the Building Code. The church is requesting an extension beyond the 90 days allowed to complete all remodeling, additions and repairs. Section 4.10, Subdivision 4.E.3. requires that if the building is relocated . within the City, within 90 days after removal, all remodeling, additions or repairs as indicated in the application, any documentation filed in support thereof, or building permit must be completed. The church intends to remodel the structure over time and initially will use it as a seasonal ( warm weather ) facility. City Code Chapter 4, Section 4.10, Subd. 13.G. prohibits moving a building to a site that would result in the relocated structure being more than 10 years older than the oldest existing abutting structure.This provision appears to have been included in the Code to pertain to residential structures. If the Council approves this moving permit, it should note the granting of a variance • • Eagan Covenant Church September 20, 1995 Page 4 from Provision G. Variance Setback-The City Code requires 2 feet of setback from a lot boundary for every 1 foot in height of any structure in the Public Facilities Zoning District. The barn is 30 feet tall which requires a 60 foot setback. The proposed placement of the barn on the church property will require a variance of 38 feet to the setback required from the south boundary line. Hardship-The applicant has indicated that the hardship is that there is not enough room between the parking lot and the south property line to meet the 60 foot setback requirement. SUMMARY/CONCLUSION The applicant is proposing to move a 1,920 square foot barn from the northeast corner of Diff ley and Lexington Way to the side yard along the southern boundary of the Eagan Covenant Church property located at 4100 Lexington Way. A permit is required from the City Council authorizing the movement of a building,to a location within the City. The proposed placement of the barn on the church property requires a 38 foot side yard variance from the side yard lot line. The church is requesting that the City Council waive the required cash deposits and the 90 day time limit allowed for completing all repairs and renovations. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED • Moving Permit To approve/deny a permit 'to move a barn from the northeast corner of Diffley Road and Lexington Way to Lot 1, Block 1, Eagan Evangelical Covenant Church Addition. If approved, the moving permit shall be subject to the following condition: 1. All other City Code requirements shall be met. To approve/deny a waiver of the $2,000 deposit used to ensure that the service connections are removed, plugged or shut off and that the site is left in a clear and safe condition. To approve/deny a waiver of the cash deposit or letter of credit in the amount of 75% of the estimated cost to bring the building into compliance with the Building Code. To approve/deny a waiver to the 90 days allowed to complete all repairs and remodeling. • ( ? • I i iat. i I Eagan Covenant Church September 20, 1995 Page 5 To approve/deny a waiver to the moving of a building to a site that is more than 10 years older than the oldest existing abutting structure. Variance To approve/deny a 38 foot variance to the required 60 foot side yard setback for Lot 1, Block 1, Eagan Evangelical Covenant Church Addition. If granted, the variance shall be subject to the following condition: 1. All other City Code requirements shall be met. • ( 7g .. . _ i'%> X11 .. ,40 rvo .■-•"-•.-. r 27 sai b it Q K }c iR. ‘ot‘�i 4Y --=7-7=s .. - - • i.k.;".' -1•?:---■ \\ r I •P, ,,„. ./r • \ ‘,, /1\ jur 110/'- ' I It% ( •••• • II IL r 0 14):s " 4;\ • • \r/0 -.1 / ° vie . Ili:\ NA(' ' .),,,„ '■ ..., ‘ '''' /it C ''000 ' . • • II II 1 " I-? o 41,0P 7,,,s, 4iPpi, \ - _.11 ID_ vAgi, \ \4-.(t. \ ; ',00-miK 11/4 40)„s • \ • ` I Ate' 0® i �� ``� %' \\ v`\ O ,... ... ,. �I 4b Preec;.p.► ..,,,,,.-77. ................. ...................\ \\' \ \\ .. I 1 , • . ,�-ej • -- 1 'A1u.11 T” �� ,L1 ct�ion lSctrr)• ��\ `\� .. II ,•. . 1.. II 3 1I ;r 0 ° i II \% 1l, II a CITY OF EAGAN CITY OF EAGAN v.\ II 1� j 014-54 i 031.54 I% \•B 1�11 If II ■�: a �•� • II 'I � 5-5' - `� \016-54!It I � i Ii ._, `EAG'AN.o., k3QNI 034-54• -I' 11•• a `' ' Iii 0 _,......1 ix. . 1 77 , i t u l i I un I L .. �.. .., �i lI J[i �.J z %. . •• u w 1/,' 2'\ , �• Q / \ t a ■ , I W H(9.../:. •,.\ \ ir . Cn i. (..( , 1 L '. 41117*, \ -1b\i, . 4 n1.115 I� - l.. . / i i 0111111L iIII0 i' 1 • e ^ 1 i t ' ■ ..._ .tf:1.11.1.11.11 11.0.� x \. S ' , UJJJ!JJJIJIJIJU I 0 a ........,,,.,., Lbi■,.. ; a al re 1111111 WWI i l : '.,\ .. . \ C 9 ± - 2 \ ,\ s :t 111 _wlw�____ \ J./CC — Cl... 4. I I ` \ U z ■ 14 . ct - 4, W Z .. 2 s W q 'cc co a.W ..Q..p E• . Y. &I <.,• ,a C • Z - > ro • < O *.n. < cc 3. Z r ... W J • .« 0 .. O <. 2:11.: -. • �.•m•,• N V r -•.a.. N m /fel . . • 1/4/0/0/c-filetc • DATE: S ptember 12, 1995 TO: Eagan City Council and Staff FROM: Eagan Covenant Church SUBJECT: Proposal Re: Barn On Former Soderhoim Property Goal: Gain Approval To Move Barn Onto Church Property For Further Development The Eagan Covenant Church would like to move the historical barn from the former Soderholm property (NW corner of Diffley and Lexington Ave.), which is being developed, to the church's property for development into a youth activity center and multi-purpose building for the church and community. A similar style barn was renovated and converted into a youth center by the Bethany Fellowship Church in Bloomington. This barn was completely renovated and updated inside to provide very effective space for youth activities. The outside has been maintained in a way to retain the original character of the barn and allow it to tastefully fit into?a more modern surrounding development. The Bethany Fellowship barn is one design idea we are considering for our proposed renovation of the Soderhoim barn. Pictures of the Soderhoim barn and the Bethany Fellowship barn and proposed site are on pages 3-7. The developers of the Soderholm property, Ray and Jo Connelly and Dell and Maylu Einess have graciously agreed to donate the barn to the church and to help pay for the moving of the structure to the church's property. • Our goal is to move the barn to our property as soon as possible and get it placed on a new foundation. The barn is in good condition and we will maintain and enhance its appearance and the surrounding area on our site. Then we would begin renovating the inside of the structure and turning it into a youth activity center and multi-purpose building for the church and community. We plan to use the facility as a seasonal building to serve the church and community and to keep awareness and support up until the renovation can be completed. We would anticipate this renovation being done in phases, starting with the first floor and spanning several years. We are currently raising funds and obtaining volunteers to assist with this project from within our-church and our community. We believe this structure has historical significance to our community and is a salute to the rural midwest and a visible reminder of our roots. Therefore, w _7"I I I I I 111 I 1 • Eagan Covenant Church Proposal Re: Barn On Former Soderholm Property September 12, 1995 Page 2 would ask that the building be moved onto our site under a local historical designation to allow us the needed time to fully renovate this large structure into a youth activity center and multi-purpose building. Also, we would ask that a letter-of-credit or cash bond to ensure compliance with building codes within a specified time be waived under these circumstances. The church agrees to work closely with, and cooperate with, the city in regards to the renovation of this structure and compliance with building codes. Also, in regards to the reclaiming of the old barn site and capping of the well, etc., it is our understanding that the developers have a separate agreement with the city to ensure that the existing site is reclaimed properly in relation to the property being developed. • • • Agenda Information Memo September 20, 1995 s A. CONTRACT 95-04,DEERWOOD TOWNHOMES ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: To receive the bids for Contract 95-04 (Deerwood Townhomes-Utilities) and award the contract to the lowest responsible bidder. FACTS: • On July 11,the City Council approved the detailed plans and specifications for the installation of utilities to be installed along Deerwood Drive to service the proposed Deerwood Townhome development located north of Deerwood Drive and east of 35E. • At 10:30 a.m. on July 28, 1995, formal bids were received in response to an advertised competitive bid solicitation. The attached bid tabulation shows the relationship of the low bidder to the engineer's estimate based on detailed plans and the estimate contained in the feasibility report presented at the public hearing held on March 21, 1995, for Project 682. All bids have been reviewed for compliance with the specification requirements and accuracy and found to be in representative. • On August 1,the City Council received the bids and continued the contract award indefinitely due to the fact that the necessary utility easements, public rights-of-way and developer financial commitments associated with the final approval of the Deerwood Townhomes Addition were not in order. • All easements required beyond the scope of the Deerwood Townhome development are being acquired through negotiations and/or acquisitions with rights of entry being available on September 25. ISSUES: • If the final subdivision process is completed in time for Council approval earlier on the agenda, it would then be appropriate to award this contract. • Although the specifications obligated the bidder to guarantee his bids for 45 days(to August 25), the low bidder(Northdale Construction Company) has agreed to extend his bids an additional 30 days(September 30)to allow the developer to complete his final plat process. ATTACHMENTS: • Bid tabulation, page t f . • Location map, page (15. ) P3 _city of eagan DEERWOOD TOWNHOMES SANITARY SEWER&WATER MAIN CITY PROJECT#682 CONTRACT#95-04 BID DATE: FRIDAY, JULY 28, 1995 BID TIME: 10:30 A.M. CONTRACTORS TOTAL BASE BID W/CHANGE ORDER#1 1. Northdale Construction $254,504.05 $214,178.43 2. Ryan Contracting 266,873.20 3. S & M Hentges 320,781.00 4. Bonine Excavating 358,206.20 5. Dave Perkins Contracting 256,868.00 LOW BID $254,504.05 Feasibility Report Estimate $195,930.00 %Over (+) Under () + 29.90% +9.3% Engineer's Estimate $240,000.00 %Over (+) Under (-) + 6.04% N/A I h ea nV N N to o • N in 0 N IN c,4 chht Cs1 CNI .t ._ 0N N O � O Q N ,..., • .t N 1 , M M] Z N O :,_, , 0 ._� N V ° 0 ___ ,., _� R C n i M 04107411110@g1 r N I .- N � ei WI ARV er jjlaJPPER5.- OM ,,‘ 6 1111; • O N M al ,I31 / 0 r. N N 1 g .c 4 in ziNN,, ii N N Q IT L bl4� M N •- AN P I „*is ‘ I I Y SO te h d��� . :.—. )) ;4: F o In 0 to G; it co °i o 4 h a i S3 b i �O 0 a 1 o J 0 8 el X 0 3i 1 ,nom N ' I \\ i 80-OM Itil hill.: j-- . i \ , '""! 4,- `,.. .0., h i a: \ a ii, ,,,11., .-I:A I ,:iii0„ .ON■....°3""`I R k , . . 6.1 ir ‘). 4 ft,.... ;; 4. _. 4, .. ., ~ink x �, I ligliPA 9- 7>)41140. I Agenda Information Memo September 20, 1995 B. CONTRACT 95-04, CHANGE ORDER#1 (DEERWOOD TOWNHOMES) ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: Approve Change Order#1 to Contract 95-04 (Deerwood Townhomes-Utilities) and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute all related documents. FACTS: • When the bids were received for the above-referenced contract,the low bid significantly exceeded the engineer's and feasibility report estimates. Staff began an evaluation to determine where costs could be reduced. • During this process, Rottlund Homes approached the City with a proposed development plan incorporating the Francis Franz and Bieter parcels. After reviewing the proposed grading plan, it was determined that the sanitary sewer elevation could be raised approximately 10' and still provide service for future development. This reduced depth then allowed the City to consider an "open cut" crossing of Deerwood Drive rather than,the more expensive "tunnel" method of construction. The combination of this reduced depth and open cut result in a Change Order DEDUCT of$40,325.62. • This Change Order also extends the original contract completion date from November 15, 1995, to December 15, 1995. ISSUES: • Contract 95-04 must first be awarded by Council action before this Change Order can be considered. • °84‘ 4 Agenda Information Memo September 20, 1995 Eagan City Council Meeting C. JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT/RUNWAY 4/22 MEDIATION SURVEY ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: To continue indefinitely consideration of the Runway 4/22 mediation survey joint powers agreement pending specification of a dollar amount for each participating agency. FACTS: • The Metropolitan Council is in receipt of one response to the request for proposals for a survey of mediation alternatives for the Runway 4/22 extension. Responses to this survey may also provide information for the dual track discussion. • The participating agencies will meet on Thursday, August 21 to discuss alternatives associated with the proposal. The proposal has provided price breakdowns for various combinations of work elements. Staff will participate in the mediation discussion on the 21st to determine an actual cost to the community or whether the Met Council will readvertise to attract additional proposals. That information will be provided to the City Council at the earliest opportunity. No action is suggested until a final amount can be determined. / g7 -f II T- -I I -- • Agenda Information Memo September 20, 1995 Eagan City Council Meeting A. EASTER LUTHERAN CHURCH,COMP. GUIDE PLAN AMENDMENT & PRELIMINARY PLANNED DEVELOPMENT/CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: ► To approve a Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment of 12.9 acres from D-1 Single Family Residential to PF (Public Facility) to allow the development of a 79,000 sq. ft. church facility to be located on the northwest corner of Cliff Road and Pilot Knob Road in the southeast quarter of Section 28. ► To approve or deny a Preliminary Planned Development/Conditional Use Permit to allow the development of a 79,000 sq. ft. church facility to be located on the northwest corner of Cliff Road and Pilot Knob Road in the southeast quarter of Section 28 subject to the 15 conditions recommended by the Advisory Planning Commission. FACTS: • In December 1994,the City Council denied a somewhat similar request by Easter Lutheran Church for a Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment and Preliminary P.D./Conditional Use Permit for its proposed church because of the excessive impervious surface area. Since then, two members of the City Council who voted against the proposal have met with the church and indicated that they would be more comfortable with an impervious surface area in the 25-35% range. The church was encouraged to revise its plan to address the City Council's concerns. • Easter Lutheran Church has submitted a revised plan. The impervious surface cover is proposed at 34.7% as opposed to 52.6% under the original proposal. The applicant now also proposes on-site water quality treatment and the present proposal incorporates a .72 acre pond which is feasible to accommodate water quality treatment requirements. • The primary way in which the plan has been modified to reduce the impervious surface is to stack the future parking required by Phase III development of the church; tat is, the parking will be a structured facility. • The term of the Planned Development is 15 years with Phase I commencing by January 1, 1997. • li • Approval of this Preliminary Planned Development/Conditional Use Permit will enable the church to commence its fund raising program. There are significant additional detailed plans to develop over the coming years to insure that the project is implemented correctly. The church is aware of these responsibilities and commended to fulfilling all conditions of the Preliminary Planned Development approval. • The Advisory Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on this matter at its meeting of August, 22, 1995 and recommends approval of both the Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment and the Preliminary Planned'Development/Conditional Use Permit subject to conditions. BACKGROUND/ATTACHMENTS: (2) Minutes of the August 22 1995 APC mee ' g, pages ege through /g1 �throu h / . Staff Report, pages A g • • Page 5 August 22, 1995 ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLIC HEARINGS EASTER LUTHERAN CHURCH COMPREHENSIVE GUIDE PLAN AMENDMENT&PRELIMINARY PLANNED DEVELOPMENT/CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT Chairman Miller opened the first public hearing of the evening regarding a Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment of .12.9 acres from D-1 Single Family Residential to PF (Public Facility), Quasi-Public, and a Preliminary Planned Development/Conditional Use Permit to allow the development of a 79,000 square foot church facility to be located on the northwest corner of Cliff Road and Pilot Knob Road in the SE'/. of Section 28. _ Member Burdorf inquired with City Attorney Dougherty as to whether he had a • conflict of interest due to the fact that he is a member of the applicant church and on a special committee. City Attorney Dougherty advised that Member Burdorf would only have a conflict of interest requiring his abstention from the issue if he had a financial interest in the APC's decision. • Chairman Miller advised the Commission that the City Council denied the applicant's request in December 1994 because of the excessive impervious surface area. Chairman Miller further stated that the City Council indicated to the applicant that it would be comfortable with an impervious surface area in the thirties range: He further stated that the City Council encouraged the developer to revise his plan in to address the City Council's concerns. Chairman Miller stated that the developer obviously took heed to the City Council's statements and has now submitted a revised plan to meet the City Council's concerns. Chairman Miller further stated that the APC's role is to determ ine whether the proposal is a permitted land use and further noted that the applicant has advised-him that the applicant is willing to meet the tree preservation policy and mitigation as required. Planner Tyree introduced this item. Ms. Tyree highlighted the information presented in the City staffs planning report dated August 9, 1995. Ms. Tyree noted the significant changes from the original proposal to the present revised proposal, noting that the impervious surface cover is 34.7% as opposed to 52.6% under the original proposal. Ms. Tyree further noted that the applicant now proposes on-site water quality treatment and noted that the present proposal incorporates a .72 acre pond which is feasible to accommodate water quality treatment requirements. Pastor James Borgschatz, a representative of the applicant, stated that the revised plan allows a lot more green area and will allow the Church to develop the area with a park-like atmosphere. He stated that the C ii urrcf h continues to grow and wants a site that ° Page 6 August 22, 1995 ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION will allow the Church to expand as its needs expand. He further advised that in 1991 when the subject property was purchased, the City Code allowed a 50% impervious surface. He stated that he appreciates that changes in the Code can exist and noted that the City Council's concern was the amount of impervious surface and not the location of the use at that site. He further stated that the City Council encouraged the applicant to revise the plan with on-site water quality treatment and reduce tree loss with mitigation. He stated that the revised plan does accomplish what the City Council encouraged the applicant to do. He further opined that a church is a preferred use then residential on the subject property. In response to Member Isberg's inquiry, Pastor Borgschatz stated that the proposed parking will occur in phases, the first being the sanctuary parking located in the front, the second phase will result in an unsurfaced recreational parking to the east of the sanctuary and the third phase will come with the development of the educational building _ at which time the ramp will be constructed. Larry Frank, a resident and member of the applicant Church, stated that the site is currently zoned single family but that a church is the best use because of the busy intersection and ability to open the Lake to public access which option would not be available if singe family was developed. Mr. Frank further stated that he conducted a new tree survey for the Church and counted 110 significant trees as opposed to 149. He further stated that 36 were coniferous trees and 32 soft woods which are not quality trees. Member Carlson inquired as to whether the applicant would object to moving the Cliff Road access 30 feet to save the Colorado Spruce trees to which Pastor Borgschatz stated that the applicant chose that location of the Cliff Road access because of the existing curb cut by the County. He stated that it would be difficult to deal with the County in moving the access but the applicant is open to moving the access if there are no significant economic implications and the County approves._ Planner Tyree noted that moving the Cliff Road access 30 feet is merely a suggestion, not a requirement of staff due to staffs acknowledgment that' it will be difficult in dealing with the County to move the access location. Pastor Borgschatz also stated that an option for tree replacement would be having a program through the Church which would allow members who have lost loved ones to plant a tree on the site in their memory. Ms. Tyree further stated that the applicant has the option of tree transplanting because of the delay in time of any development on the subject property. Member Heyl stated that the tree removal issue and the impervious surface issue have been addressed with the revised plan and therefore supports the applicant's proposal. Member Heyl moved, Member Isberg seconded, a motion to recommend approval of the Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment of 12.9 acres from D-1 Single Family Residential to PF (Public Facility), Quasi-Public. All approved in favor. tq Page 7 August 22, 1995 ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION Member Heyl moved, Member Isberg seconded, a motion to recommend approval of a Preliminary Planned Development/Conditional Use Permit to allow the development of a 79,000 square foot church facility to be located on the northwest corner of Cliff Road and Pilot Knob Road in the SE1/4 of Section 28, subject to the following conditions: Planned Development 1. The applicant should enter into a Planned Development Agreement in accordance with Section 11.40 Subd. 6. Planned Development with the City prior to the Final Planned Development/Preliminary Subdivision application. Conditional Use Permit 2. This Conditional Use Permit shall be recorded with Dakota County within 60 days of its approval with documentation of its recording provided to the City. Planned Development Phasing Sequence - 3. To permit Easter Lutheran Church to construct a church facility in three phases of development: Phase I; Building Program: Multi-Purpose Great Room(Future Gymnasium) and support Space 12-13,000 GSF building area Worship seating for approximately 400 • Preschool Classrooms small office support spaces Estimated Cost: $2.2-2.3 million Parking Spaces: 150 (400 seats/2.7 seats/space) Time Frame: 1997-1998 - Phase II Building Program: Balanced Facility for 650 seat sanctuary Expand phase I development from a Great Room serving multiple purposes to a fully developed balanced facility for a sanctuary capable of seating 650 (expandable in the future to 1,050). • 49-50,000 GSF building area total (addition of 37,000 GSF) Estimated Cost: $5.2 million Parking Spaces: 91 spaces (241 total) Time Frame: 2001-2002 Page 8 • August 22, 1995 ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION Phase III Building Program: Balanced facility for 1,050 seat sanctuary Expand phase II development by increasing the sanctuary seating capacity to 1,050 and enlarging all other church facilities to support this size increase. 78-79,000 GSF building area total (addition of 29,000 GSF) Estimated Cost: $3.6 million Parking Spaces: 143 additional including 143 spaces in structured parking. (384 total spaces) Time Frame: 2007-2009 Summary of Impervious Area by Phase: Estimated Estimated Total Percent Bldg Cov. Site Cov. Coverage Coverage Phase One 10,000 s.f. 52,900 s.f. 62,900 s.f. 14.6 Phase Two 13,000 s.f. 52,350 s.f. 63,350 s.f. 15.1 Phase Three 12,250 s.f. 0 s.f. 19.250 s.f. 4.5, • Total ; 42,250 s.f. 105,250 s.f. 147,500 s.f. 34.2 Planned Development Tgrra 4. The term of the Planned Development shall be 15 years from the date of City Council approval, and Phase I shall be commenced by January 1, 1997. The site must be platted prior to the initiation of Phase I. Final Planned Development 5. Prior to the issuance of building permits,the following plans shall be approved. This may be approved in stages as development ensues. * Final Plat - * Final Site Plan * Final Lighting Plan * Final Utility Plan * Final Grading,Drainage&Erosion Control Plan * Final Landscaping Plan * Final Signage * Final Building Elevation * Tree Preservation Plan Financial Obligation 6. At the time of development, financial obligations will be charged for Lateral Benefit Water, Lateral Benefit Sanitary Sewer, Storm Sewer Trunk, WAC, (all at the rate effective on that date). / 1 _ Page 9 August 22, 1995 ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION grading 7. The grading plan shall be revised to reflect grading slopes of 3:1 or gentler. Tree Preservation 8. Replacement of 97 significant trees with 214 Category "B" trees shall occur either on-site or off-site. A replacement plan should be submitted to indicate exact planting locations. Parking 9. The revised site plan shall show the additional 15' of right-of-way which may affect the proposed parking layout and setbacks. 10. The development will permit a total of 384 nine foot parking stalls. _ Water Quality 11. A minimum disturbance/minimum maintenance plan for pervious areas within the site shall be developed and submitted for City approval prior to issuance of a • grading permit. The intent of this plan will be to preserve existing vegetation whenever feasible and to minimize' the need for applications of fertilizer and pesticidesliierbicides. 12. A 50'buffer strip in which no existing vegetation may be disturbed or impacted shall be established extending back from the OHWM of Thomas Lake shall be established. The boundary of the buffer strip will be clearly marked in the field prior to grading. 13. Through on-site ponding a minimum phosphorus load reduction of 90% of that needed to met non-degradation standards for Thomas Lake shall be met. Any remaining mitigation requirement will be met through payment of a supplemental cash dedication. Wetlands 14. No filling or draining of the fringe wetland along Thomas Lake. Streets/Access 15. All revised plans shall be revised to show a total of 75' half right-of-way for Cliff • Road(County Road No. 32). All approved in favor. fqV PLANNING REPORT • CITY OF EAGAN REPORT DATE: August 9, 1995 CASE: 28-CG-6-5-95 28-RZ-10-5-95 APPLICANT: Easter Lutheran Church HEARING DATE: August 22, 1995 PROPERTY OWNER: Easter Lutheran Church PREPARED BY: Shannon Tyree REQUEST: Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment & Preliminary Planned Development Amendment • Easter Lutheran Church LOCATION: Northwest corner of Cliff Road and Pilot Knob Road. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: D-I, single family residential (0-3 u/ac) ZONING: R-1 Single Family SUMMARY OF REOUEST Easter Lutheran Church is requesting a Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment changing the existing Land Use Guide Plan designation from D-I Single Family(0-3 u/ac)to PF-Public Facility, and a Preliminary Planned Development/Conditional - Use Permit to allow the development of a 79,000 s.f. church facility to be located in the northwest corner of the intersection of Cliff Road and Pilot Knob Road. AUTHORITY FOR REVIEW • City Code Section 13.20 Subd. 6 states that "In the case of platting, the Planning Commission and the Council shall be guided by criteria, including the following, in approving, denying or establishing conditions related thereto:" A. That the proposed subdivision does comply with applicable City Code provisions and the Comprehensive Guide Plan. B. That the design or improvement of the proposed subdivision complies with applicable plans of Dakota County, State of Minnesota, or the Metropolitan Council. C. That the physical characteristics of the site including but not limited to, topography, vegetation,susceptibility to erosion and siltation, susceptibility to flooding,water storage, • and retention are such that the site is suitable for the type of development or use contemplated. D. That the site physically is suitable for the proposed density of the development. ( i Planning Report - Easter Lutheran Church August 22, 1995 Page 2 E. That the design of the subdivision or the proposed improvements is not likely to cause environmental damage. F. That the design of the subdivision or the type of improvements is not likely to cause health problems. G. That the design of the subdivision or the improvements will not conflict with easements of record or with easements established by judgement of court. H. That completion of the proposed development of the subdivision can be completed in a timely manner so as not to cause an economic burden upon the City for maintenance, repayment of bonds or similar burden. • I. That the subdivision has been properly planned for possible solar energy system use within the subdivision or as it relates to adjacent property. (Refer to City Handbook on Solar Access). J. That the design of public improvements for the subdivision is compatible and consistent with the platting or approved preliminary plat on adjacent lands. . K. That the subdivision is in compliance with those standards set forth in that certain document entitled"City of Eagan Water Quality Management Plan for the Gun Club Lake Watershed Management Organization" which document is properly approved and filed with the office of the City Clerk hereinafter referred to as the "Water Quality Management Plan". Said document and all of the notations, references and other information contained therein shall have the same force and effect as if fully set down herein and is hereby made a part of this Chapter by reference and incorporated herein as fully as if set forth herein at length. It shall be the responsibility of the City Clerk to maintain the Water Quality Management Plan and make the same available to the public. Planned Development: Chapter 11.20, Subd. 8, B., petgrmination. states: "In considering any petition for such district, the Planning Commission and the Council in the interests of carrying out the intent and purpose of this Subdivision, shall determine whether or not such planned development will: (1) better adapt itself to its physical and aesthetic setting and that of surrounding lands than does development of the underlying zoning district; (2) be feasible for the owner and developer economically to complete according to proposed plans; (3) benefit the community at large to a greater degree than would development of the underlying zoning district." • • Planning Report - Easter Lutheran Church August 22, 1995 Page 3 Conditional Use Permit required findings: A. Will not be detrimental to or endanger the public health,safety,or general welfare of the neighborhood or the City. B. Will be harmonious with the general and applicable specific objectives of the Comprehensive Plan and City Code provisions. C. Will be designed, constructed, operated and maintained so as to be compatible in appearance with the existing or intended character of the general vicinity and will not change the essential character of that area, nor substantially diminish or impair property values within the neighborhood. D. Will be served adequately by essential public facilities and services, including streets, police and fire protection, drainage structures, refuse disposal, water and sewer systems and schools. E. Will not involve uses, activities, processes, materials, equipment and conditions of operation that will be hazardous or detrimental to any persons, property or the general welfare because of excessive production of traffic, noise, smoke,fumes, glare or odors. F. ' Will have vehicular ingress and egress to the property which does not create traffic congestion or interfere with traffic on surrounding public streets. G. Will not result in the destruction, loss or damage of a natural, scenic or historic feature of major importance. • SURROUNDING USES The following existing uses, zoning, and comprehensive guide plan designations surround the subject property: North - Thomas Lake Park; zoned P; guided P. South - Twin Manor Addition; zoned R-1; guided D-I. East - South Water Treatment Facility& Clearwater Park,zoned P&PF;guided P&PF. West- Thomas Lake& Thomas Lake Add*n (single family d/u )zoned R-1; guided D-I. $ACKGROUND/HISTORY Since 1991 the church has been involved in the development of its future church at this location. In 1994,the church proposed a four phase development which included the ultimate development of 73,385 s.f. of building, 380 nine foot parking stalls and an impervious surface coverage of 52.6%. At that time the plans included a approximately nine different parking areas. Parking lots surrounded the building on the north, east, and south sides. The plans were denied by the City Council due to the intensity of the development and associated high impervious surface coverage. • • .. , • • Planning Report - Easter Lutheran Church August 22, 1995 Page 4 Since that time the church has reevaluated its development possibilities for the site, and have reapplied after revising its plans to minimize the impervious surface coverage. The Natural Resources Subcommittee voted to recommend denial of the development proposal based on unacceptably high impacts to the woodland resource. A portion of the impact is due to the construction of detention basins needed to meet water quality treatment requirements for the site. EVALUATION OF R EOUEST Introduction. Easter Lutheran Church is proposing to develop a church facility including worship, education, and family life activities at the proposed site. ,Actual development of the approximately 79,000 s.f building and associated 384 parking spaces will occur in phases. The Preliminary Planned Development/Conditional Use Permit process is being done in order to establish the feasibility of the project (for both the church and the City). The Conditional Use Permit is required when the impervious coverage exceeds the 25% maximum allowed by the shoreland zoning code. The church is proposing 34.7%. By developing in phases through the Planned Development process,the church can accommodate its projected growth with development of incremental phases, and the City will have an opportunity for detailed review of the specific requested development. Final development plans will be required with each phase of development. The primary difference in the plan is the reduction in footprint square footage of the building and the reduction in surface parking stalls. By reducing these two components, the overall impervious surface has been reduced by approximately 18%. ' For comparison purposes,the 1994 plan showed surface parking lots covering the majority of the buildable property, other than the 73,385 s.f. building (see exhibit). The building had a much larger footprint than it does now because the church has decided to stack or layer some of the uses rather than develop a building that is spread out on one floor. The current plan has a total square footage of 79,000 s.f., larger than the '94 plan. Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment: Currently, the site is guided D-I Single Family residential. The request by the applicant is to change the land use guide plan designation to PF - Public Facilities. The Comprehensive Guide Plan does not address churches or their specific locations. However, the City has approved church uses in a variety of locations including residentially guided property with access to major arterials such as Pilot Knob Road and Lexington Avenue. Preliminary Planned Develonment/Conditional Use Permit Phasine The proposed development will occur in phases over the next 14 - 15 years. According to the church, a significant factor in the proposed timing is the success of a fund raising campaign. The church's current plan anticipates following three phases of development. /T1 Planning Report - Easter Lutheran Church August 22, 1995 Page 5 base I: • Building Program: Multi-Purpose Great Room (Future Gymnasium) and support space 12-13,000 GSF.building area Worship seating for approximately 400 • Preschool Classrooms Small office Support spaces Estimated Cost: $2.2-2.3 million Parking Spaces: 150 (400 seats/2.7 seats/space) Time Frame: 1997-1998 Phase II Building Program: Facility for 650 seat sanctuary Expand phase I development from a Great Room serving multiple purposes • to a fully developed balanced facility for a sanctuary capable of seating 650 (expandable in the future to 1,050). 49-50,000 GSF building area total (addition of 37,000 GSF)) Estimated Cost: $5.2 million Parking Spaces: 91 spaces (241 total) • Time Frame: 2001-2002 Phase III Building Program: Facility for 1,050 seat sanctuary Expand phase II development by increasing the sanctuary seating capacity to 1,050 and enlarging all other church facilities to support this size increase. 78-79,000 GSF building area total (addition of 29,000 GSF) Estimated Cost: $3.6 million Parking Spaces: 143 additional including 143 spaces in structured parking.(384 total spaces) Time Frame: 2007-2009 Summary of Impervious Area by Phase: Estimated Estimated Total Percent bldg Coy. Site Coy, Coverage Coverage Phase One 10,000 s.f. 52,900 s.f. 62,900 s.f. 14.6 Phase Two 13,000 s.f. 52,350 s.f. 63,350 s.f. 15.1 Phase Three 12,250 s.f. 0 s.f. 19.250 s.f. 4.5 Total 42,250 s.f. 105,250 s.f. 147,500 s.f. 34.2 . ? • a1i] i I - Planning Report - Easter Lutheran Church August 22, 1995 Page 6 • Lot The three unplatted parcels (P1D No.'s 10-02800-010-79, 10-02800-020-79, & 10-02800- 010-80) will be required to be combined through the platting process prior to building permit issuance. Parcel 010-79,the northernmost, is approximately 3.0 acres (2.62 less highway right- of-way) South of that parcel is 020-79 which is 3.0 acres (2.66 less highway right-of-way) The largest parcel is located along both Cliff and Pilot Knob Road, and is 9.09 acres (7.59 less highway right-of-way. • Combined, the lots total 15.09 acres (gross) or 12.87 (net) acres. The area of developable land remaining above the ordinary high water mark (OHWM) is approximately 10.2 acres. Setbacks Thomas Lake is a designated as a General Development Lake in the City's Shoreland Zoning Code. Any building occuring adjacent to this Lake is required to maintain a minimum 50' setback from the Ordinary High Water Mark (OHWM). The building and parking were designed to meet this setback requirement. J1eight The maximum allowable building height in a General Development Lake shoreland zone is 35'. At this point the church has no definitive architectural plans for the building. When Phase I is developed architectural plans will need to be submitted and reviewed. Parking Ordinance requires a minimum of one space per 3.5 sanctuary seats. The church, based on its experience at the Pilot Knob/Diffley Roads location, believes it needs to provide parking at a much higher ratio than the minimum. The concept plan has been developed at a rate of one space per 2.7 sanctuary seats, or 384 seats. As a result the church will be providing 84 seats above the code requirement. Phase III includes the construction of a parking ramp to accommodate the increased seating in the worship area. The ramp, or structure parking, is an effort to minimize the amount of impervious surface on the lot. This phase of development is not expected to develop for 12 or more years from now. Tree Preservation The tree inventory for the site identified 149 significant trees and approximately 40% of the site is covered by trees (crown coverage). The current sketch plan indicates that 97 trees or 65% of the significant trees identified will be removed. This exceeds the 30% allowable removal and will necessitate the replacement of 214 category "B" trees. It is the intent of the tree preservation policy to encourage development of buildings and parking lots that would take into account the significant tree locations and design around them where possible. With regard to that, staff is suggesting that the access on Cliff Road be moved 30'east • •of the proposed location. In doing so, approximately 25 of the 28 30' Colorado Spruce trees would be saved. By avoiding these mature spruce trees the church's removal would drop from 65% to approximately 50%, and the church would not need to acquire an easement from the neighboring property to the west. a-cs _ _ • Planning Report - Easter Lutheran Church August 22, 1995 Page 7 • Another option discussed between the City Forester and the church is "root pruning". Because the church is not proposing development for a year and a half or two years,they are in a position to do root pruning on some of the other spruce trees and birch trees scattered throughout the site. This will allow the church to transplant trees already existing on site. This will further reduce the percentage of removal to approximately 40%. • Water Quality This proposed development is located along the southeastern shore of Thomas Lake directly across the lake from Thomas Lake Park. The development would generate runoff that would discharge to Thomas Lake, a Class I direct contact recreation lake with a mean depth of about 4 feet and a maximum depth of 6 feet. In late 1995, the City reviewed a development proposal for this same site by the applicant. The City Council denied the development proposal,in part due to impacts on water quality in Thomas Lake and tree/woodland impacts. Water quality impacts stemmed mainly from the high impervious coverage of the site which was projected to generate a much larger runoff volume than could be adequately treated by on-site ponding within the development parcel. The applicant has revised the site plan to reduce the impervious coverage from 53% (based on the area of the site above the ordinary high water mark of Thomas Lake) for the original proposal to just under 35%for the current proposal. With the reduced impervious coverage,the site would require about one acre of properly located and designed ponding to meet the non-degradation standard for Thomas Lake, as well as some other design modifications. While the current site plan incorporates just under.5 acres of ponding,it appears feasible to accommodate water quality treatment requirements at the reduced development intensity proposed. The Natural Resources Subcommittee met on July 25, 1995 to review the June 29, 1995 site plan proposal. Because of unacceptably high impacts to tree resources on the site, the Subcommittee voted unanimously to recommend denial of the current development proposal. The Subcommittee did not deal specifically with the water-related aspects of the development proposal in its recommendation, but did acknowledge that construction of ponding for water quality treatment would exacerbate tree loss within the site and that an even lower density development may be the only way of meeting all natural resources management objectives for the site. The outlet and the northerly inlet for the proposed'pond in the southwest corner of the site are situated too closely together to function properly for water quality purposes. The developer will need to revise the storm drainage plan to ensure that those pipes have proper spacing in accordance with City's Water Quality standards. Wetlands. The only wetland located on the site is the fringe wetland associated with Thomas Lake which extends back from the edge of the lake anywhere from several feet to 75 feet depending on the location within the site. The June 29, 1995 site plan shows grading within this wetland fringe for a detention basin. Staff has requested that the developer avoid any grading O Planning Report - Easter Lutheran Church August 22, 1995 Page 8 within the wetland fringe in order to provide maximum protection of the shoreline of Thomas Lake,and the developer has agreed to modify the site plan in this regard by moving the proposed ponding area further to the north. No filling or draining of the wetland fringe should be allowed. The development will be responsible for installing and maintaining erosion control methods in accordance with the City's Erosion/ Sediment Control standards. Grading The preliminary grading plan as shown needs some revisions. The plan shows three areas where disturbance is encroaching into the 50' buffer area (measured from the OHWM). The proposed grading along the east edge of the site indicates slopes steeper than 3:1. City standards require that all graded slopes be 3:1 or gentler. The applicant should revise the grading plan to reflect either slopes of 3:1 or gentler or the construction of a retaining wall to meet the slopes requirements in that area. The plan also proposes to utilize the decked parking configuration on the south side of the development as a "retaining wall" on the slice extending from Cliff Road. However, the parking deck is not proposed to be constructed with the first phase of development, nor is a retaining wall in accordance with City standards. The applicant will be responsible for submitting plans and specifications with the final grading plans detaining the construction of any retaining walls for the development. Utilities An existing 8" sanitary sewer in Cliff R oad has been provided to serve this site. The invert elevation of the 8" line is 907.5'. Existing watermain is available in Cliff and Pilot Knob Roads. An 8" water main stub has been provided to the site in the southwest corner from Cliff Road and in the northwest corner of the site from Pilot Knob Road. Access/Street Design Street access for the proposed development is available from Cliff Road to the south and Pilot Knob Road to the east. The preliminary site plan shows a driveway connection to Cliff Road along the west property line of the site approximately 600 from Pilot Knob Road. The shared driveway along the west property line will require an easement from the adjoining property to the west. The driveway connection to Cliff Road is at a location where a median opening has been provided on Cliff Road. If the access is moved 30'to prevent the loss of the Spruce trees the County would have to approve the new location and grant a permit. The County plat commission recommends that a right turn lane be required to be built by the developer for the Cliff Road driveway opening. • North/south access is provided from Pilot Knob Road,the City's water treatment facility and park are located opposite of this site and the church's ingress/egress location will be matched directly across from the Water Treatment Facility's access. The County's approval of the driveway connection to Pilot Knob Road is contingent on the removal of the three existing driveway connections to Pilot Knob Road. ■ "'")0 • • Planning Report - Easter Lutheran Church August 22, 1995 Page 9 Easements/Right-of-Way Dakota County will require 75 feet of half right-of-way on Cliff Road, therefore an additional 15 feet of right-of-way will be required to be dedicated on the final plat. This additional right-of-way should be reflected, for planning purposes, on all plan sheets submitted. Compatibility with Surrounding Area. Locating churches in or near residential neighborhoods is typical and can be compatible land uses. Locating a church facility near a public facilities district is also a compatible combination. SUMMARY/CONCLUSION Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment The requested change in land use from D-I (0-3 units/ acre) to PF - Public Facilities would be compatible land uses. Preliminary Planned Development/Conditional Use Permit Developing the site as a Planned Development matches the church's desire for phasing the project over a number of years and the City's interest in reviewing specific development as it occurs. The proposal generally meets the requirements for lots and setbacks. An outstanding issue (related to the Conditional Use Permit) for the Advisory Planning Commission and the City Council to decide is whether to permit the 9.7% impervious surface above the 25%maximum. The revised proposal is 34.7%; 17.9%lower than the 52.6%originally requested in 1994. Specific plans will be required with each phase of development. .The Church is interested in gaining approval of the proposed land use change and approval of its Preliminary Planned Development so it may move ahead with more detailed plans involving fund raising and site development. Detailed plans are required with each phase of development for review by the City. Prior to reviewing those plans a revised grading plan should be submitted which will not show any encroachment into the 50' buffer area. A couple of options have been discussed with regard to reducing the percentage of tree removal. The Commission may want to consider how these options can be incorporated into the development. Any changes to the plan would require a revised plan to be submitted. ACTIONS TO BE CONSIDERED To recommend approval or denial of the requested Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment from D-I (0-3 units per acre) to PF - Public Facilities. • To recommend approval or denial of the proposed Preliminary Planned Development/Conditional Use Permit for a 79,000 s.f. church facility with a total of 384 parking spaces and a maximum impervious surface coverage of 34.7% subject to the following conditions: Planning Report - Easter Lutheran Church August 22, 1995 Page 10 Planned Development 1. The applicant should enter into a Planned Development Agreement in accordance with Section 11.40 Subd. 6. Planned Development with the City prior to the Final Planned Development/Preliminary Subdivision application. Conditional Use Permit 2. This Conditional Use Permit.shall be recorded with Dakota County within 60 days of its approval with documentation of its recording provided to the City. Planned Development Phasing_Sequence 3. To permit Easter Lutheran Church to construct a church facility in three phases of development: Phase_I� Building Program: Multi-Purpose Great Room (Future Gymnasium) and support Space • 12-13,000 GSF building area Worship seating for approximately 400 Preschool Classrooms small office support spaces Estimated Cost: $2.2-2.3 million Parking Spaces: 150 (400 seats/2.7 seats/space) Time Frame: 1997-1998 • base II Building Program: Balanced Facility for 650 seat sanctuary Expand phase I development from a Great Room serving multiple purposes to a fully developed balanced facility for a sanctuary capable of seating 650 (expandable in the future to 1,050). 49-50,000 GSF building area total (addition of 37,000 GSF) Estimated Cost: $5.2 million Parking Spaces: 91 spaces (241 total) Time Frame: 2001-2002 Phaffi Building Program: Balanced facility for 1,050 seat sanctuary Expand phase II development by increasing the sanctuary seating capacity to 1,050 and enlarging all other church facilities to support this size increase. 78-79,000 GSF building area total (addition of 29,000 GSF) Estimated Cost: $3.6 million • Parking Spaces: 143 additional including 143 spaces in structured parking. (384 total spaces) Time Frame: 2007-2009 • G20 . . Planning Report - Easter Lutheran Church August 22, 1995 Page 11 Summary of Impervious Area by Phase: Estimated Estimated Total Percent Bldg Cov. Site Coy. Coverage Coverage Phase One 10,000 s.f. 52,900 s.f. 62,900 s.f. 14.6 Phase Two 13,000 s.f. 52,350 s.f. 63,350 s.f. 15.1 Phase Three 12,250 s.£ _ 0 s.f. 19.250 s.f. 4.5 • Total 42,250 s.f. 105,250 s.f. 147,500 s.f. 34.2 PlanngdJ)evelopment Term 4. The term of the Planned Development shall be 15 years from the date of City Council approval, and Phase I shall be commenced by January 1, 1997. The site must be platted prior to the initiation of Phase I. Final Planned Development • 5. Prior to the issuance of building permits,the following plans shall be approved. This may be approved in stages as development ensues. * Final Plat * Final Site Plan * Final Lighting Plan * Final Utility Plan * Final Grading, Drainage & Erosion Control Plan * Final Landscaping Plan * Final Signage * Final Building Elevation * Tree Preservation Plan Financial Obligation 6. At the time of development, financial obligations will be charged for Lateral Benefit Water, Lateral Benefit Sanitary Sewer, Storm Sewer Trunk, WAC, (all at the rate effective on that date). Grading 7. The grading plan shall be revised to reflect grading slopes of 3:1 or gentler. Tree Preservation 8. Replacement of 97 significant trees with 214 Category "B" trees shall occur either on-site or off-site. A replacement plan should be submitted to indicate exact planting locations. Parking 9. The revised site plan shall show the additional 15' of right-of-way which may affect the proposed parking layout and setbacks. 10. The development will permit a total of 384 nine foot parking stalls. • ' Lai I • Planning Report - Easter Lutheran Church August 22, 1995 Page 12 • Water Ouality 11. A minimum disturbance/minimum maintenance plan for pervious areas within the site shall be developed and submitted for City approval prior to issuance of a grading permit. The intent of this plan will be to preserve existing vegetation whenever feasible and to minimize the need for applications of fertilizer and pesticides/herbicides. 12. A 50' buffer strip in which no existing vegetation may be disturbed or impacted shall be established extending back from the OHWM of Thomas Lake shall be established. The boundary of the buffer strip will be clearly marked in the field prior to grading. 13. Through on-site ponding a minimum phosphorus load reduction of 90% of that needed to met non-degradation standards for Thomas Lake shall be met. Any remaining mitigation requirement will be met through payment of a supplemental cash dedication. Wetlands 14. No filling or draining of the fringe wetland along Thomas Lake. • Streets/Access 15. All revised plans shall be revised to show a total of 75' half right-of-way for Cliff Road (County Road No. 32). • (OP FINANCIAL OBLIGATION - Easter Lutheran Rezoning - Financial Obligation The properties under consideration for rezoning to public facility were charged for their share of the City's public utility infrastructure at single family rates. There is no additional charge at the time of, or as a condition of rezoning. There are,however,additional charges due at the time of platting. The following estimate of charges due was prepared using the 1995 rates. The financial obligation will be computed at the rates in existence at time of final platting. Improvements Use Rate Quantity Amount Lateral Benefit Water P.F. $25.50/if 1578.41 ff $40,249 Lateral Benefit Sanitary Sewer P.F. 19.20/ff 630.79 ff 12,111 Storm Sewer Trunk P.F. .04/sq. ft. 435,600 sq. ft. 17,424 WAC P.F. 2,745/Ac 10 Ac 27.450 TOTAL ;97234 • I • � �1 LA T / J 41111111111&4!• y �.71' v � 1 — L V y:. t CT, - - v, Y I CRESTRDGE LA. II.•OS,p ' E T. . I °u'�7T'T`Lf�: W GG 1;4 - • f. N r� K A I JAY WA ,` r• V U CCC���JJJ VS 'T- yi? 1 ::. 3 7 4 ! 6 D 1 ru f;ShJ Kt1�STA. • .''.V C • p� WA I •� �Mx A;1^ OLAOT ISFiEL�,K 0 ,A L i�u` < - 1)J ,„,,., i, 'ARK°r1.- ARK ( cr- E- ii'/r �I �G,_�' ,. IMESCO 1 4 a.KHAWK 4'4"GI NCSk [/ ® �'' P r, � L..!4� RK 52 96 L . ���� I RKWA. N, AVE. - E S I Wle,lty - ROCKY LA. q1� ... STVEW s AL. CUTTERS LA 1 �' , A \ �1 :EC, - 5 z l ROCKY 4 8 '!Y > ,.- Z -2; I —t-!Zsg:_x_4„ err •r.,. DEERWOOD DRIVE CARTHY 455•Oil- �./ `4 80 �.5' BERRY AR I 72'OEERw s1�-- \J ' I r� ---\.-J' . tiAaAlc LK ( PATH ; � �z pE�p�•• PATRICK A10R v1E1 LA.PT, I C -LT• •.` EAGAN J9!• •�• W + BERRY 45 PARK > a. - s■ ere". �. W .° '^d .: Iel ¢ - ' 1 po 1-711//•1�t� T3s Z. flRLn IIOA9� • \\1t�1 .r _1 �\ (Co.RD. 30) --—-- j1' �u„�r' EAST : :®c__,„ Lr -i. O •e LEY 1 N . .' A-2' �' a a1TFLET CLIT , ,., T. CR II 5 I Ro 4 1 a �L RL'pN /� �D-rL, c O • ST- II-E o�IE.LA. �� CP1i.Lio.t. ,� \f„,' � O 1 ; ,_�� COAT e RGREE .-. . le i • 43 PAR ;� A ;� PL •• i o ,,1. .P D-< , _ _( > RD . ;o �_4 till ARK 1 N. I- � THOMAS • bp....r - �. OAKg .1-y, eta' —-� �`'� , 4 PARK T PA f y'En�r. ot Y la, Effk DERIIESS I = /T/Q� S THOMAS (- E _ -T 0 - OAK ,k, 1 LDC% �.�s- , 'S1-"c ... . . • . 7 15 CE4-se.4 . -0; -,,v, .,_ ,a _maim- -,- - .; C -- --— - - RKFIA- -- ---- --`-------- -- /IECIall 35 �4 • k Ili r N°N WALDEN s g O I 62 ,Q�' HEIGHTS i hL K i �,. PARK -+ .: 1411 Pca VEW b LOCATION . 2,Ci . : • • I Ie[r iltfit - .. vim,C( c ..::1 aS.1.AI I,, : .:^r+o• •'�tt.�' H ,... ) ! .auk ZONING r it �' _ :8:3!4 �';21:rr: k...,, r .-:F' .CSC. ti A '.: 4:4 ,-. . �s R-1 (Single Family Residential) ;N «.-p, ► I" - -g • • •:�,,- • ~ ti •= ire _--.1m17---,g r 'I, O . .• GO . 1 •I f DI I i jri /• 011 1 • PF ll PF I t PF 17 • P ' °'Y t ; ` r ■ i \COMPREHENSIVE GUIDE PLAN ! . . 1 1 , _ •D-I (Single Family Residential) ° • • • '•° 4 ,( , ► — CSC • I•' G,I •r� ) P �...i • •111 . . J !•, r i ';F PF i 1. ' ,-. ;[ ' /IL �,\� PF �._L.. . ) •• i"1 �� o•I • • • ) r r _____, ' ' t 1. ,..X . 1 ---1_l:j,_- PF • • „....;,07 . „ „ , , , • . ...., . . MIMINNION&. .4MIIMMilemili , . • • III ' ,•/ • II I ' NORMAL .., •• • • li ATI:It . . . ..• • ... .. . . 1:1J.ParI0N . ■ / .• • HARD COVER 901 I / Site Area (9.9 Acres) 461,244 sq.ft. I . Ett,Impervious Ares 147,500 scilt. I .•". , * -. • I Percent Impervious 34296 .• /Am 1 : I P a ARKING 0 Ultimate Development 284 spaces * 6 :21„, Stmcnuay Capacity 1,050 seats Parking Ratio 27 • i , • ) .... ill51 • • •% 0,7,------• i _pi .` \ .er--s— \ ' 1 .1 s ' I litill4 sf,„„-NA, (so/swift i i I • AM: Peed 871 . \.,....., \ I 1 1• iMglyi Tilli■ill.'‘ArTAII Al PLAN1 .1 I - ) 1 Ii I V I - p L) I ..„ 1 1,Al■r, .. 61r0 \ • .. . I. _9•_d.is.f • _ • - • 0 . J • .2 e..•. • . da 0010.11. -•- . 1,.• -8 1 . -,•e----w ike • ,:„...,F... ...,•-•ill a:. • fem,a..4,0100 P1LASE____1 ,?HARE • .- .; I• . 470111011 ‘17.Pill 'fHR.E--1—• TWO .....-!--.- ..-..- , • • ISA •-77.44.0-■ U 0.c '1 I i 1 . i I " I kkiif .?HA E "I ' il • I.,--ft-- -i..-.0A . 'tete- :„._,„,,,..11.- _____, - -------=.--...--' '' • e 'I il • 46,„ r • Chrlitha atlas --,---,. -_----7 .. I !I . • ....--- 5. :5 i• llii\l°.L Q...-i lel .,.. ---17_, !woo ' .AI 1 ''''' ',—... ...______. ::•..: • 2:7 -.--7•::—`-"-----i.- • :y • I .... .!"----7----7":.7"-----■-____----• if i . .., /. •-■ f I 1 / • s'Qlsilm ..- ..' . .S. /. ,lip PLINIO.,ad Two heft al AB grade..' • . , '' ,. :" • e ,' I I / ^-....... • . ..- '[ 111Speo Abele . , . .. .I .. . . -*N.• ..... ,•14.$.8pAce Salm . , ' ' •"-t-j•)• ., ... ....- . .. .. . . •. •— — Clff Road • 1)1i ,.-•• — ( • . . Note. • iscilcdory urvc't obtained irons H•linm• II. St-Inr.Dti• 171111i Sur :)IP r• 1,1 • Topogrdpfly oblm114.41 (111111 I)711Wi II (.011111.) 1■11111111A.11111: 1)(I1/1 "In 7:::•=41".4:: --- .eML . NORTH ' .•••■•••■•■•■. 111406.. 01 6,1■7100 1100 •CONCEPT PLAN s irm....■Immims.•■■•••••••••••••=rommums Roisingtob xeesier Group Inc. EASTER LUTHERAN CHURCH '.... ' ..“. . .... NA,... li . Thomas Lake Site : Eagan, Min . • • . 4,4 u.../1.0....w . Plush;/Mtg. 7500 Metre Houlenrd.Suite 020 ■ • - .• lattitspililbalitvgas 55439 - . . , rd.,.., ., • E ,:: , ,, Significant Trees to be Replaced .'"'— NORMAL i � Hardwoods 8• to 2G 19 I V.V.WATER !. y•, -". '" +20 3 1 904.1 �,!' .i' • Softwoods 12 to 24- 25 •� , ' '`' +24- 8 I .�• - • i Conifers 12' to 24' 3 -!v• -- : +24' 40 I .0-' ••• •-• .- .wei u ' • •' • i ::::,, ,....,. ,,,:.Ordinnr; High e u .ai 1r•' -)frl ' .:. Key inter stark: 908 0^1• M • • s� CE Chinese Elm I ' s'o __ I• f•BE s�elder 50' Setback from" vita.- ••.� i •! CS Colorado Spruce Ordinary High \ w pillow ; - _ ,. .1 • CK Cottonwood Water Level �� ^'� i'y� 'j' CA Crabapple I • '% ` '`,` :III J I':i w s1i Silver Maple i.THOMAS ' ''• :'•' c i 80 Sur Oak 'R a !! ;%:;' C PO Pin Oak I •• - w.44.oa': 9 QA Birch c Aspen Disturbance I LAKE •'1 •3S'.'•::' 'r''''i a•A? Austrian Pine Boundary I ... •,• ',. ','I, o �T� 11 • _.--1—.._ -++-r--'�'� ; I :: .1... i.... ..,.. . . .. .. :. ,. . . • • --- — Cliff Road • • • -•T_.. :a be • Note: • Boundary Surrey obtained from Delmar H. Scbwans land Surveyors Inc. • Topography obtained from Dakota County Engineering D�ept. p" ' .._ • I'- • •. .... Nos • 4 Preliminary Tr Inventory . . .■ 100 100 . Hol.ington Tyler Group Inc. Mama imam EASTER LUTHERAN CHURCH `" 1 1< ado VIVO . i I Thomas Lake Site: tan/ Minnesota a,+.... ..00 /4/ ■./••••••••,1 • w.o•/a•M • �!• • NN;:. \Q►IMAI. - — /. ' III K ATER I 1•U:VATIIIN � 11011 ,.,.-r, /j' rIl I- f / / j , I I • I I / 0 I • I : I ............-•----, I —AT, r'""•-111.(.( \ I l' .., 3 I \l ` \� WATCH TIiI:ATMI:N'f PLANT 1 ' i:NTRY 1)II)VI TrxoMAS �1 I ,0 LAK11, • , II 0 • .../ • • . fdirs 41 II I . — r -- - - - - ' ' ' w, VI . c IMisses Cf.t.tiao• I .. •: • 1 /, /I •••••. A (II Ak i0).1 Worship .._•,i if L■ittraw I 1 8 HU vpr.: I.i 1 . / . l Woe � \ ` " lef I 1 • . Art f i�r ir Z I I I ..... ..................................................;>/ I' 1 0 ,,."1011111:iiii) A es, . I - -- - Cliff Ro1lfl - - - - - ( Nolo • Boundary $urvc•■ oII min d from Below IL N.lev.xn•' Lund Si,r '■orr, in,• • Topography obl mood (ron, Ilnhula Cnnnly I•:nFnn••rn,g I)(•pl. I` , NOR H . : ' o Do 100 006 PRELIMINARY GRADING PLAN �� Holeiagtoa Koehler Group Inc. EASTER LUTHERAN CHURCH """'t 111 Thomas Lake Site : Eagan, Minnesota • ■ • 7300 Metro Douleverd, Sutte 525 IWaeapOiL W , nonota 66400 312/033-3050 •I • . • ell - ' •'•' ':••••:..glfzi•••• -•••111111111■1111■111• ■ Mr Om fawa■•• MN de _ gi 1 • 1.......te.4,i. • •/.•' .'''..: • -; •• :•'—',■••••• • 411t11 SI ' 0,,e • ..• = 1 .100. —''— tibusts ‘ 1.13 MS% . " sal I ' ,,' e•' 40* :•., ••.•:•. . I . .,- ' .. • . ••,:•••.:• . . ...• , . . • —1;,. . • I , . • 4 • /AI • .•. • rai imicaw••••••••■•■••••••• • .• 1 . • 5 ar'' ) I .: ;" • . ia! niftily FAQ Sag_ .. . . • IL ( I. . 1 .• L , , • . . , • • ......,... . • . v -.. . , . ., , . ....,,,s.„. • .. . , i r........\\. . . •.: . )2:1 Mao of asap Nom - .. ..... •••••%•• SID 1••• 11,-. --- • it . 1110 . sza kiwi moo*i••• :-.• '- . ‘ •• •• • . • ". . • • •' 1 II • . ,L • • • g 1. .. i • II ]=1 .. 1.• -....:,. ...„ .., .. AT. 1; .• -.11A7121 IMMO? MI • 61:/ PINY Mira . =1 .. •'•" • : 11.11()M IQ ' - '#-I- I -•'. • ' • — •1 . ,. •. •=_---_ a • - ; • I 1 ..; • ., . e. -• • I:=2 ... • ••• i . , . .......• •• : •s'11" ..1...'• 1 k,..t11...."; .‘: • • .‘ 1 LAINE ..., /.• . . .. , •.... .. . .. . . . . . . • . •I I . . • . 1... •••=_ ■•• . . ...• .1 .•:. -- :-• .,. 1.--,• ...-...;:„' ;,..: . 7.- ': • 7••• I I Alas' .. . 111,' • ' .1.4 • '.•■1:••‘ ••••) .. 1 , (•/7 - ' . • •• :1'1 ' , i 1 i - . •011111 0_ • •4 '1.1‘ V e . I . • " .• 4 1.;;: ...) .. e . • .1" '• • 4;1 -- . ..10.1 •;,•::1 V:. . r .. ■N\ - . . ... ..., . . •• ...-------- f ../.,„...y....zi.-",17; ,,.- . • .•. , .,...4.: .. ... .--.----...,_ -274' ...T 17: .. ■••• i • . t :a I . - •:■ : .1 : • al ....'r •' I ,iii./1 i '' ,i'• li ''''"' . ,. ."' . • 'At' -:I a: .Z. ..• • • ::: I li ••••• ; I. .,'11111.1"."4:.17:177)7/:..' V . 1111111°: ' ,i oi g 1 I * .1 .4 • 1....• ..... ,, • 174- . :i;Impolo.' 1 a": 9: la i 110 • . im •• •:•• i 7 . gr.• - 1' ' • . . .. . 00 ' ••ei•• :, 1.-1," Minis • ...loft' I 6 ■ i , ' % L= N. "11 .1.f!!!. • ; .. • . .; • • , : ., •• • .5,,_,A._ P. ...11= • 4,1 • • . i Imola _ II I . I I • . •,lif•Aa' . •—•= da• , r i .• .. . . . 1 • • • ..1111, .. str4. , *III■-st&. • '•11 lei li I ,, . . , • • • • 4...- e,...• = • ..4.1A 1.111° -I.- ii 1 Tr\.."1" i i " ;;* ■ : ..-L• • = III 1 '.•‘• '. •• .• • ..., il. •, . ---_4i1,4. ," ', ..•. .. : Z ! . • I , • * ry I • • . ... • I MI"!el •••• IiihI •" :- Marrl• ' ., 81=1• • . -t.'•I 111 , • • • • • . :.: '• ••• 1 r 'i • ' 1 .. i IL i ' • 7.'"l' •••. • . . • ' . • 4 Zi.1■ ... . -, . __,--..r.- tit - • . , I ...-...-,......." • • 144 l' I : I . . . ' " I-."1 _ . • _ ' . - ,ftwainal211)PI 1 I la V..% 11; if • ' '• -i . . i '' • ;-* . •••.;„ ± .*... ..00'• • •• ....•dr . .. . • , .." . . • . .. . . . ...,. A. .•6..,.....zua,s...7.r.40 . ••:.:::.7 ., ••••• IP ' '"' . ' 7 ...:.:. •• .....• .•••• •••• ••• ••• r • , I. •• • cliff itund : •••IP•••MD 0••••••• • • • •••• •• ... • 1 ': . 11994 PLAN 1 . • 1— / • • lista • lkaandon loom". slalomed loos Winer II •••18s ss•• wool tionwpirs, Int• I . • • • Twissariiels) 6.1•1•Nsassl 81•01.1 $,e •4* 1.4“•4 Cows:..form Iwo . . . i . • ' •• ••• i . • • • • 111 0 0 0 1 • .•• • ••3• ..,• • r•, • , • . - CONCEPT PLAN . -. ,. , . il to ass so • Cr . \ - I Illsiriallas Semler — lao. o• mp'mown SOO • • EASTER LUTHERAN • CHIJRCII " --,Mk aro 111111111POPIMUIPS . - lbw Orrous. • ....;.••i•. • Thomas Lake Site : Eagan, Minnesota •1111111•0 1 . ••r ' .I 1"1,4141 Ilelril":1""Is•AsZ4. 11•1112 Ur. • II . simmtvirgooges WO . , ...,...._... - .,....._..„-. -- ...i- . -. -- - . , • ,._. __ = ,, I 1,, , , 1 ` .. - Z _ v•• • I . • " a to e, e . F u° go tO 1 4 W D e ri .c N • la W ■ • • • ■ . �rnrri�li9NINUiW��Akia�ti�gti i iauuny�nmientpin�pNmte.iiraal y1144161101=1.. i lui�il1wrMtr�IrNrtilr , . — ..1.; , -' \ :..1.:.::::::.`iilif::::::`:?:Iiiillifili::::::i: iii:•1:::::::::::::::::iiiiiIiiir:::::::::iiiiii.:::::::::::ilitii.;.:::::::.. iii::::ii.:Ent.:::r•:::::;:iiriiiiiiiiiinilii - A �]���� _ • �c��l3:. •r f 1 v i • i 1 I 1 11:;1 ''i i 111.11iIII'I _'\• `!r'.�' �•‘•� imp� I, , 11!: I I ! • 1 � r�'� I1 11 Yid 10$111,11,i r'If . ,::: :: :: :: :...:- c jl Ihrill Yid :,I 1i;'1 ! ill ; : .:::::::: 1 0, In I 1 ; .,t 11111 1 111.1 X11 1 , :� .. W,L 1 .I Is ,I11191 illnill 111114 li IIt1l11 4 ' I ', '0.". •1'111it�1.11:11i1.I'1 11,i'111 .fI ''— Q 0 Ildilt� IIIIItllll�tl 1 0 • 0 ',fig .0 ••■)) . . : . , -.9 - ,, • Agenda Information Memo September 20, 1995 Eagan City Council Meeting • B. FINAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT- VIDEO,UPDATE (THOMAS LAKE CENTER) ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: • To approve or deny a Final Planned Development proposal to construct a Video Update store and 49 parking spaces on Lot 3, Block 1 of Thomas Lake Center in the Blackhawk Park PD subject to the 5 conditions recommended by the Advisory Planning Commission. • To approve or deny a Conditional Use Permit to allow a pylon advertising sign on Lot 3, Block 1 of Thomas Lake Center subject to the 3 conditions in the staff report. FACTS: • The Final Planned Development for Lot 3, Block 1, Thomas Lake Center proposed by Chesapeake Partners will include a 7,117 s.f. Video Update store and 49 parking spaces (three shown as future spaces), landscaping, signage, lighting and building materials as shown on plans submitted. • Chesapeake Partners is proposing a free-standing pylon sign in the southeast corner of the lot near the intersection of Cliff Road and Thomas Lake Road. The pylon sign will be 27 feet in height with a sign area of 120 s.f. per face. It will be located 300 feet from the existing pylon sign for Thomas Lake Center as required by Code. • The Advisory Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on this proposed Final Planned Development and Conditional Use Permit at its regular meeting on August 22, 1995. • • The Commission recommends approval of the Final Planned Development subject to the 5 conditions in the staff report. • The Commission recommends denial of the Conditional Use permit for a pylon sign stating that it is not compatible with the character of a small neighborhood shopping center. ISSUES: • The Commission questioned the need for the proposed pylon advertising sign, given the proposed building signage and the existing pylon sign for Thomas Lake Center. They • (72 • further determined the pylon sign and potential proliferation of pylon signs in the area would change the neighborhood character of Thomas Lake Center. As such, the Commission found that the proposed pylon sign was inconsistent with criteria C of City Code Section 11.40, Subd. 4 C which states that such use "Will be designed, constructed, operated and maintained so as to be compatible in appearance with the existing or intended character of the general vicinity and will not change the essential character of that area..." BACKGROUND/ATTACHMENTS: (2) APC minutes of August 22, 1995, pager7througO Staff Report, pages6'througl0. te..2( T_�- ,_ Page 11 August 22, 1995 ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION VIDEO UPDATE-FINAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT & CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT Chairman Miller opened the next public hearing of the evening regarding a Final Planned Development of Lot 3, Block 1, Thomas Lake Center and a Conditional Use Permit for a pylon sign located on the northwest corner of Cliff Road and Thomas Lake Road in the SW'/z of Section 28. Planner Farnham introduced this item. Ms. Farnham highlighted the information presented in the City staffs planning report dated August 10, 1995. Ms. Farnham highlighted the background and history, the existing conditions and the surrounding uses of the subject property. Ms. Farnham further noted that the applicant is requesting signage on the east and west sides of the building and a pylon sign in the southeast corner of the lot adjacent to the intersection of Cliff and Thomas Lake. Ms. Farnham noted that the applicant is requesting a deviation from the signage code to allow a sign over the store entrance which does not face a major street. Ms. Farnham noted that the applicant's building signage is substantially less than the 20% allowable building signage. Finally, Ms. Farnham noted that the proposed pylon sign meets the standards for free-standing business sign. • Peter Huger, a representative of the applicant was present but made no comment. Member Segal inquired with Mr. Hilger as to the need for a pylon sign since the site has great visibility at Cliff and Thomas Lake Road. The applicant explained that the building signage is limited and not visible to all traffic on Cliff or Thomas Lake. Member Carlson stated that she agrees with the applicant and that all retail business needs visibility through signage. Member Burdorf noted that video stores tend to serve the local neighboring community and members of that community will know the location of the video store. Mr. Hilger responded that the building proposed signage is below the ordinance requirements and a pylon sign is needed in-anticipation of development across the street which could obstruct the east building signage. Member Miller stated that the Commission has two issues: (1) the building signs meet City Code and noted that the applicant's building signs are smaller than allowed by Code; and (2) does the proposed pylon sign meet the conditions of a pylon sign, which the proposal does. Member Miller went on to state that if the Commission denies the request for a Conditional Use Permit for the pylon sign, it must stale its reasons. Member Heyl noted that the applicant is requesting a deviation from the building signage regulations by requesting a sign over the entrance that is not on a public street. Planner Farnham noted that the applicant is not requesting any building signage on the Cliff Road side which is permitted but is requesting signage'over the entrance instead. Mr. Hilger stated that any building signage on the Cliff Road side would not be visible to any a • • Page 12 • August 22, 1995 ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION eastbound traffic and therefore it is not feasible to place the building signage at that location. Member Segal stated that a pylon sign is too intense for the small shopping area character of the Thomas Lake Center although recognized that a conditional use permit should be approved if the applicant meets the performance standards and conditions. Member Segal moved, Carlson seconded, a motion to recommend Final Planned Development of Lot 3, Block 1, Thomas Lake Center located on the northwest corner of Cliff Road and Thomas Lake Road in the SW'/2 of Section 28, subject to the following conditions: 1. The Final Planned Development for Lot 3, Block 1, Thomas Lake Center will include a 7,117 s.f. Video Update store and 49 parking spaces (three shown as future parking spaces), landscaping, 'signage, lighting and building materials as shown on plans submitted. 2. Recording of a cross-parking agreement at, Dakota County to allow the proposed parking lot to adjoin the existing parking lot to the west. 3. Execution of a Final Planned Development Agreement. 4. The developer shall submit a detailed erosion control plan in accordance with City Erosion/Sediment Control Standards. 5. Cash dedication for trails. • Member Hey!noted that with respect to the pylon sign conditional use permit, the Commission can deny a conditional use permit if it does not meet the general standards for the issuance of a conditional use permit. Member Hey! noted that a conditional use permit may be denied if it is not harmonious or compatible with the character of the surrounding area. Member Heyl submitted that a pylon sign at this location would not be harmonious or compatible with the character of the area. Member Heyl moved, Member Isberg seconded, a motion to recommend denial of the Conditional Use Permit for the pylon 'sign. Member Carlson concurred with Member Heyl stating that Thomas Lake Center is a too small of a commercial node for a pylon sign and that the major concerns of the neighborhood residents was to keep the shopping center small. The applicant requested that the matter be continued before the Commission votes on Member Heyl's motion in order to allow the applicant to work with staff to change the appearance of the pylon sign. Member Segal advised Mr. Hilger that the basis for denial is not the appearance, but that a pylon sign itself is not harmonious or compatible with the character of the area. All approved in favor except Chairman Miller opposed. • �f - PLANNING REPORT CITY OF EAGAN REPORT DATE: August'10, 1995 CASE #: 28-RZ-12-6-95 PD APPLICANT: Chesapeake Partners HEARING DATE: August 22,1995 PROPERTY OWNER: Eagan Center Associates PREPARED BY: Julie Farnham REQUEST: Final Planned Development and Conditional Use Permit (pylon sign) LOCATION: Lot 3,Block 1,Thomas Lake Center(NW corner of Cliff Road and Thomas Lake Road). COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: Community Shopping Center (CSC) • ZONING: Planned Development (PD) SUMMARY OF REQUEST Chesapeake Partners is requesting Final Planned Development approval to allow construction of a Video Update store on Lot 3, Block 1,Thomas Lake Center in the Blackhawk Park PD and a Conditional Use Permit to allow a pylon sign on the lot. The 1.07 acre site is in the SE corner of Thomas Lake Center at the intersection of Cliff Road and Thomas Lake Road. The Final Planned Development allows review of final development plans specific to this lot. AUTHORITY FOR REVIEW City Code Chapter 11, Section 11.40 Subd. 6, D., Final Development Plans, states: "Prior to the construction or the issuance of building permits, the following information shall be approved. This may be approved in stages as development ensues". 1. Final Plat: This shall be in accordance With Chapter 13 of the City Code and revisions thereto. 2. Final Building Drawings and Specifications: These shall be presented to the Building Inspector for review and recommendation to the Planning Commission and Council. • 3. Final Site Plans and Landscape Schedule: These shall be presented to the City staff for review and recommendation to the Planning Commission and Council. These shall be scaled drawings and include all site detail. 0? • Planning Report - Chesapeake Partners August 22, 1995 Page 2 City Code Chapter 4, Section 4.20 Subd. 1 states that pylon signs are considered conditional uses and Subd. 6, Free-Standing Business Signs. Standards. defines the standards for pylon signs as follows: 1. Up to one allowed per building. 2. No pylon sign may be located within 300 ft. of any other pylon sign, measured on the same side of the street. 3. No pylon signs shall project more than 27 ft. above the lot level, roadway level, or a specified point between the two levels as determined by the Council. The level shall be based upon visibility factors from the adjacent roadway(s). • 4. No pylon sign shall exceed 125 s.f. in area per side. • BACKGROUND/HISTORY The original planned development proposal for the 600 acre Blackhawk Park PD area was submitted to the City in 1972 as "Eagan 500". The Blackhawk Park Planned Development Agreement was executed in June 1977 for a 15 year term, expiring in June 1992. Both designated this site for retail/commercial development. To date, no action has been taken to formally terminate the Planned Development. The PD designates the site for commercial development (CSC-Community Shopping Center). No previous development has occurred on this lot; however, the site was graded and some perimeter landscaping installed, possibly in conjunction with development of Thomas Lake Center. EXISTING CONDITIONS The site is relatively IeveI with slight berming parallel to the north lot line. The lot is covered with grass and includes existing shrub masses, deciduous overstory and evergreen trees parallel to the east and south property lines. There are also existing trees planted along the drive aisle .through Thomas Lake Center adjacent to the north lot line of this site. The applicant intends to preserve the existing landscaping. The lot abuts an existing parking lot for Thomas Lake Center to the west. SURROUNDING USES . - The following existing uses, zoning, and comprehensive guide plan designations surround the subject property: . I 2III] i • I Planning Report - Chesapeake Partners August 22, 1995 Page 3 North - Thomas Lake Center; zoned PD; guided CSC (Com. Shopping Ctr.) South - Beacon Hill Subd. (single family); zoned PD; guided D-1 (single family) East - Large lot residential; zoned R-1 (single family); guided D-1 (single family) West - Thomas Lake Center; zoned PD; guided CSC EVALUATION OF REOUEST If approved, the proposed site plan will constitute the Final Planned Development for Lot 3, Block 1,Thomas Lake Center (Blackhawk Park PD), which requires the developer to submit the following plans: * Final Site Plan * Final Building Elevations • Final Sign Plan • * Final Landscape Plan The proposed site plan will achieve Final Planned Development status when it has been reviewed by the Advisory Planning Commission and approved by the City Council. Compatibility with Surrounding Area-The proposed video store is compatible with surrounding commercial/retail uses in Thomas Lake Center. The proposed building and landscaping were designed to blend with Thomas Lake Center. • Setbacks-All building and parking setbacks are met. The parking setback along Cliff Road (32 ft.) matches the adjacent (existing) parking tot. A 5 ft. parking setback will be provided along the north edge of the site. • Parking/Access- The developer has proposed to connect to and expand the existing parking area of Thomas Lake Center to serve the Video Update area. The site plan indicates a total of 49 parking stalls; 46 for initial construction and space allotted for 3 additional stalls for future parking if needed. Based on a parking rate of 1 stall per 150 s.f.,47 stalls are required by code. All stalls and drive aisles meet code requirements for length and width. The proposed site plan also indicates that a portion of the parking will overlap onto the adjacent lot to the west. The intent is to physically join this lot with the existing parking lot. A cross-parking agreement is required. Access to the site is provided off the shopping center drive aisle and through the existing parking lot to the west. A one-way drive aisle is proposed to access the video drop-off and some angled parking on the north side of the building. Landscape Plan/Tree Preservation - The applicant intends to utilize existing landscaping which • • Planning Report - Chesapeake Partners August 22, 1995 Page 4 consists of fairly mature shrub clusters, deciduous and evergreen trees. The existing landscaping will be supplemented with plantings around the building foundation and in the parking lot islands. Two existing trees along the north edge of the proposed parking lot may need to be relocated or replaced if damaged during construction. An irrigation system will be installed in the green area around the building and parking lot. • Building Materials-The Blackhawk Park PD Agreement does not specify architectural standards. Building materials and colors are proposed to match the Thomas Lake Center. All building facades will be brick with a'stucco sign band. Rock face block will be used at the base of the pilasters. The west(front) facade has a peaked gable over the entrance similar to store entrances in Thomas Lake Center. The applicant is proposing stucco panels in the area above the sign rather than dark glass which is used on the Center. The stucco panels will be square and dark colored to achieve a similar appearance as the glass. The gable roof above the main entrance will be covered with metal ribbed roof material to match the Center. Trash/Recycling Enclosure- An enclosure for trash/recycling extends from the northeast corner of the building. It will consist of 6 ft. walls of brick to match the building. The area can be accessed from the one-way drive. All trash/recycling containers should be stored within the principal building or in the enclosure. Signage -Proposed signage includes two facade signs and one pylon sign. Signs are proposed for the east and west facades which face Thomas Lake Road and the parking lot, respectively. The sign proposed on the east facade is 40 s.f. (2.2% of facade area) and the sign on the west facade is 70 s.f. (3.5% of facade area). This is substantially less than the.20% of facade area allowed by code for building signs. The Sign Code,only allows signs on building facades facing major streets. As such,the applicant is requesting a deviation from the sign code to allow a sign on the west facade, over the store entrance. Placing the sign over the store entrance makes practical sense and is also consistent with signage placement on Thomas Lake Center. A similar deviation from the sign code was approved for Penn Cycle in the Winkler-Jackson PD. No signage is proposed on the facade facing Cliff Road. The Blackhawk Park PD Agreement does not place special limits on signage, therefore signage is subject to standard procedures. As such, a Conditional Use Permit is required for a pylon sign. The proposed pylon sign will be located in the SE corner of the lot adjacent to the intersection of Cliff and Thomas Lake roads. As proposed, the sign meets the standards for pylon signs. The sign will be setback 10 ft. from the south property line and 39 ft. from the east property line. It will be 300 ft. from the pylon sign for Thomas Lake Center. The sign height is proposed to be 27 ft. above grade and the sign area will be 120 s.f. per race. Grading-The site is relatively flat and open with existing landscaping along the south and east edges of the site. Proposed grading on the site will require minimal cuts and fills. No berming to provide screening is proposed along the street frontages because it would disturb existing C:2;;;) • i � ill I • Planning Report - Chesapeake Partners August 22, 1995 Page 5 landscaping. Developer must submit a detailed erosion control plan in accordance with City Erosion/Sediment Control Standards. Storm Drainage/Water Ouality - The preliminary storm drainage plan is acceptable with some modifications. The developer is proposing the routing of storm water run-off to the existing storm sewer along the north edge of the site. The existing storm sewer drains to Pond BP-13 and eventually to Thomas Lake. Pond BP-13 is classified as a Class 5 Nutrient Trap while Thomas Lake is classified as a Class 1 Direct Contact Water Body in the City Water Quality Management Plan. One of the proposed connections to the existing storm sewer is to an existing 12" P.V.C. storm sewer which runs through the northwest corner of the site. When this line was constructed in 1987 it was identified as a temporary installation to be removed upon development of this parcel. The development can connect to and utilize the portion of this storm sewer needed to drain the site. The connection and proposed storm sewer to existing storm sewer in the northeast of the site will require removal and replacement of the existing bituminous surface of the driving lane serving Thomas Lake Center. Utilities - The preliminary utility layout is acceptable. The developer proposes to utilize the existing sanitary sewer and water stubs previously constructed to this site. These stubs are of sufficient size, depth and capacity to serve this development. Park Dedication - Park dedication has been fulfilled for this PD. A cash dedication for trails is required. SUMMARY/CONCLUSION The proposed video store is compatible with the commercial/retail uses in Thomas Lake Center which serves the needs of surrounding residents. Proposed landscaping,brick and stucco building materials, and discrete signage are compatible with the neighborhood scale and character established by Thomas Lake Center. The proposed pylon sign meets the standards for free- standing business signs and should be compatible with the surrounding development and neighborhood. The applicant is requesting a deviation from the Sign Code to allow a sign over the main store entrance, which does not face a public street. Placing signage over the store entrance is consistent with signage placement on Thomas Lake Center. The sign area is designed to appear similar to signage on Thomas Lake Center. The overall signage proposed for this development is considerably less than allowed by code. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED A. To recommend approval or denial of the proposed Final Planned Development to construct daR Z 3 • Planning Report - Chesapeake Partners August 22, 1995 Page 6 a Video Update store on 1.07 acres at the NW intersection of Cliff Road and Thomas Lake Road subject to the following conditions: 1. The Final Planned Development for Lot 3, Block 1, Thomas Lake Center will include a 7,117 s.f. Video Update store and 49 parking spaces(three shown as future parking spaces), landscaping, signage, lighting and building materials as shown on plans submitted. 2. Recording of a cross-parking agreement at Dakota County to allow the proposed parking lot to adjoin the existing parking lot to the west. 3. Execution of a Final Planned Development Agreement. 4. The developer shall submit a detailed erosion control plan in accordance with City Erosion/Sediment Control Standards. 5. Cash dedication for trails. • B. To recommend approval of a Conditional Use Permit to allow a pylon sign on Lot 3, Block 1, Thomas Lake Center as shown on plans submitted subject to the following conditions: 1. The Conditional Use Permit shall be recorded at Dakota County within 60 days of Council approval with documentation provided to the City. 2. The sign shall be subject to the one-time sign fee of$2.50/sq.ft. 3. All applicable City Codes. • • , , „, i i i • . • . , • .•.0-' .'f.;---:,`..-- .:-ii :1,,`.;::• M J// Igir,....4-0;if-. , 4irt •-•••- z•.-•:..r._..41.,-.i-, _iip._.... f;Z.' f••■V i ;."SS 1: .-' ":: ,,,P4::T•-.VI .k.n:•7....{yr':it''' •1 E • .• ..LS/•B.■4;25 ., ,.-..lim&l:01.%•: Z.I .;.. '''.r';'•-• ale Ce t, -.. .ialk-01. -11F7-713=.... 2E•Cr=rZtrz.Z:_..2........ _ . ,... :11.1:4...,...mr! ,..7.•-";.:4-..,_ -"3=41.:147.tt•L.9.....;---;•:,..:1,_,•_.__T-L.7-:,,,_.._;-:::: ,......t-,,:f.-:=1..T-Tc--,...1 po.,,,:•"'.7_,,••I..... ZONING ___i...,c.:: . ... •_. .sc-,:i.,--E-;::-.e.-.4-:35:i.::.-... .. ____ _ ...:,--7,,,...,;,,,m.- ,- -,, •k-k;.;,,_" .).=-,...x_6111 .. . : ,.. 4.- -,_:-....,... ,.._:.,....-:: -'1.1.rii.=, -:::.,Ire.4.7;:,;":11, ■ ,.,,...',.[.., IM,...,..... ..-....x.'.. -`,-., .''TN;.•,''.'.7..:111.:5,..:..■:_,, -,-::;:.1.e.4-'•-. A:v...tWr- -_,1-1F-41C1-., PD (Planned Development) . ,7i.I.F:e..- -4' .- -'...::'•g'.'-r-:.1-----.1.-v-*,,iN.-,--.-• - - I '. 1,12,_, -- --.•-•,4,--:•-•-••-•z.„ic--,,:sw• „a it,--,• is— -\_ _,,,,,.._1 ■ -,,-•-•.-.-.fA... ...",%-:...., , ...-•.---... -47: A 'v.'''. ',..1• •r.ad A''' .1 .- `qi■-■•■:,•41.1 .'-';:l.. .r._41-•'-i1;..7-..11, -.. 44,..,■41.t . - A MI. '•••••• 74..4.11'er..7t:::::•ZZ... ";:-.;:` ,*:Abe"........., ,41)IN At.Au -_,....N.t...1,...,...:-tt ,-..,4,,,,-..1...,L,..-1._;.%...:.4, .70-2••■ I IOW -:;;A7....'"/-4-:-:; •,"--.7"."'.7..,. .47-Ft-il • EL ---.:F tt --.2,--4-- ./7 •-..-2:- TT,..,..z.- .4.L4, AI NA r --) -!\•.:%:-.--- -", fl '' j L.1-7.<:-H", ...........10_4,„ , . k.... '-‘•. ,, 4 77-::::a.:,-...... PK ' ..717. .....p:,... ..._ ..,:,, cir,Fry•••-7::•Cii:4:-•:;•=. • '•• :tk F.: :- •:• _. ,,,•t zel.N._ ,-;:i.7..;:.:-_: M :. ; .r...■ obs, NI '.:-_,:t .fcm - -•• I ab;UM --..-.•4---,f 1 ,:-.-•-'• • , ....., -.: •••■ -:,-• :-.I: ------% .. •••,1■;1. eibl•,euro. -t-:-1 pr 311 ::.7-i--7-.F-z":"--413. pP iiit - 1 •-" - : al .7.-■.,..,,,...- ... , .4. . ,•^,, .1*.err, . - .1 ItA -._ ..,-,.. -.z-. — .. , - •:•1-,- .....,. .- this. .:-=: ,-.:1:-,", ---4 . ■ . =....-.„, :I '1 v:,,..•''',.=-7. .35'4D- - ^.'" ...: . .717.7.,''.'77;77 "--.14!&444"11 ...9 ,:•7.4.'," .1 • '.-----;-=1-'--z•r_q_•:-.e• ;••!-Ampaus -,-04...- i , ,_,..,.. . , r---.3--.-7,..7- ...:7...---,_„,-.,--•• *:.--•.,-14-„,i..116.1,:.--:010 .."4-4'. -,•;:-:"-..•',---•.-t- ;"•-:i I , sly 1%,:la','24117%*41:1;Ce • -......,......,• ' .. I 41 .44. : • .,)„, , 1.. .. i ii 041 PF PF . 1 COMPREHENSIVE LL i GUIDE PLAN 6.. „ b .......... • 111 1 CSC (Community Shopping Center) 1 D. . / r"T" ..,),.. aid • sit D4 CSC 04 r _ I , ' , I •yr —r . i • s pr.: ra • - t D-le N / :MI% IF . h_ 9• cp. • 041 i / , .... i.)"....r%:::j • 1,i 04 • 1 . ' • • • L • , • e!t9 ) °.°.' • • w g y r `D IN 1��t al AW4 •r P'r'`•' u4, ,` ' �e� I C AWE I L 1/.IRPMY .... �l OEEaw00o I _ + a\Cp� oEERwcoO_ __ 9 cjz1; rACartF reu 1 �Ea+4� 1 �gw000 cY 1 1 80 7 - 169-BERRY PA i _Lac, I A ARPA�RKN _ 2t•Tr . �t� ARK 7.0 P ':arm, 1 2 icAcAiK u ut I OEEPATII DEERy. • �' / 1 it cr. g '�` ,., • IcAOOwAwc R. c ..' . 45 tl.In1 i" / A A0A •Ar ' t 41 9RRY ''1 •Au.a n. ,< = f y ` H lA. 1 7Q• ' �a. aOAO -T i.,. F--- I � , I �+� STER A. 41140. i-clis .• ::: ....... e.• /... . 9 Ry 'A r ( CL IrSON - ' •• 1; ! ..6 T. ST. 1'! '1 RL OI t I `*1 NO. 6.y 1 O •Y i OAE l A _ 1 PARI,Cti =. ~� R iP. E�9 e.. ..�A1 a, l o ®I : LAKE 1 A A PATij CAN•Ay:A �.: ERGREE • • A 1I•DO rAK ® 43 ®PAR c�� _SAS:: ! _ •. 1�: y ' rill/ -I-�^", - 74_64Pte' L..,..,-;,-+:-'12- T 11 N THOMAS `W r 1:J ,_.... .4, �` ` 4 LAKE T . '. `.]LJ V • OAK 1•ROAp ' W•'• i #, , 7PARK ,r wig RNESS i°� i -�f - ' �` THOMAS E I '� & :1 CHER oR.s y 1 •GARY S .ARD q 1 = OAK CLIFF 4. LAKE j • mot. , ` 1 3•=� -:Jr 1 �1� 011 CUT ROAD_- 'IS>. e 'P T C . - — . ca -- if 1 ��- -- - — - —i- -�NOKIA gOK1A r- ;1 A1'�=c,- , - -— 3 5 RK7tA-"S 'Ai ' �.�p,_.i�CT wAYO ; ' ` SAT. WALDEN C . CI �s • HEIGHTS - RAt' ��j,1 1 - PARK <• PARKVE# b 1 M a GOLF cz:,- .71 1% X1111 1 H COLASE 111'/ 1 I. 1 1 CO .•]L• CM a s : Si 4 g-Y•1,_., �t� $ W ` r 90 CA1.0.. :. 13.N, �� w i 4. ✓�v I S 3 GEORGE �! t ' 2 3 . PARK " RIDGECLIFF ARK PARK T- o. tr R. tt-SAlE11 R. ... �V _— I-DACE DR. Sr AWE R w�AAOtSIOK R. I v *ELLHOT N 1= j.UPC'T 14 YMOUE R. M T R. 11,TRAY R. L. 1 1I - I4/ kr a- /L = 11L R. 1 �... -'•,,�IOTA PT. 7, 7r MOM PICTIRIELL PT!► N_�mi R. 1 i CARRIAC£ I r ♦M MOM R. �tTAYOM R. ' 1 i• OgYp4 ZI.�ALTA R. J T ® 1L_WT1bmWl R. I .E'&W IAKEI 11r..,�,^y",�R. i o4 user M,a-s- aE ,A.. LAI(F 1 s3 I I 041‘15I .b I • LOCATION C)240 CO . .. •• I I d lI 0I- I 1 • C st- F I i j fi Ig 111 LI a II 1 pl Q iii h 1,; M 1 j Ilk 5 , .. , -../--- r) ,..,, m a. _ it fit 41 I ill . ]. ] IIil !Ii Ili • IA 0 s C- 1 V Cr. 'C'. • V i - -- ___-_ Ii CVr" mmunerimmwu I .] r— - [I ltt y�y,� ar r^rrb .un1n OMt IIMAttit roan to -1 II if C.. i r---1 ---;-?'"..4 S z4 Iki ' I 'I [1 ,,. - I ¢ gi LI I H ill ' 1 J : ' 1 i�x c. g . i z i I !jilt' 1 ' H rte, ♦ E tef -----i 9Al aA�YOhi'ECtiA6�►1f7.Afi�l7r9aaM'-{_—• 0t i l__J !,[ { ,> i { i - 1 IPS • `,/% z 6:2-37 .. : 01 c . . , ,..• ,, . • air=, y i, , _ _ ____ _____ ._ ____ I�T i �' . • • X g 1 . ., • .. p∎• _ 1;• IR I. - I f 1 c z g3 1 OVOH 3)Ibl SYWOHI - -- _ w • 1 } I ■ I I # € 3 Qx gc I t } i j p a I I .• 1 1 i 11 • g P.441% -• ow I A --mum . 0 �'''�� 'IOtt .'b r= 1 HP . �' I 1 I 0 y --I;I' ����r �l I• L. r . . IA,: . r ;Iiiii4; ! 1:ii, ., t Ibilii. t Opt • :.. .._._ --7,---- r : t I. I -- ir I aid 1 / 'rte ��1� `"1 ;` 1 I i �_� T:<}i s ViLzN4..J 1 ... • ill. 1 { 1 tI 1 i �; r r ':1 {r •E t { I 1 It s 1 1 1 is ,v r I I z1 ' z== Wa. t c=0 c:::Rg V ¢` Z i — IIi ] ti, !1il�� t 1 $ rla 9116 „-, ``-ate : \'' vlcs3+r+1w !{yp ;criii • I r g + i 1 1.. n??•.►�.�t �F*� Y3� ) �LCyii WI'MD12 1 ! rt s ..i1 4 !1C _JL;..I a`-- a3 N3 3IVI same kid ii ' 9J,V�dA oaclA a (1� ;� ISLe C N C t Ilp f1 - � r 'MOH - 3)4V 1 BYWOH1 i ,.._,.......r_r_..---%.\\\ a. 1 I !l wl lw_y co . I^, >1 :i ...,:, . >, / 1: 1 I 1 � 1 _ i 0 �wc r , nRi`rJl04l•1Ai00t! ■ I c p I J ' i.0.1 C41 e I Will I I j I 0:1 Ni -....)--- _NM. - -------F-- . . J' I 1 is wg iW �u. Z „ ' t W I vl� C.) • NL I • 4 [Huilliliiiii .lii (� I m C.........--t)__________,__...,Th 1 0 I . i_ 1 , . . n I a ____ . _ _ ________- 1I i 1 i l r a[1 IMd-OdY3saNn 1 ; .--1 r Oil\ �T\'x�,� vtil3 1,C,-Ill , i "c i'r' .tm—MYDYS R b si at, ,4 �, 1 ©©s.•"..",mt a31N333W1SvNOHI 11th):. ! • sl �svaan-oaa�n �� � � : A 5, if, ay, 0i-17.: , F3 i ill w eI If 8. We V I N 1 #.o sx � R i 41 )` a�g 0 • ua 41w a 4 W aVOa ar seg �s :, „�S a�Ya 3>W1 SV141OH1 1 a �� a1 q a ! _DI i C w�: 4 1 / S1 e. "A1�, Q- — _•i s°° is CO oI1 aU �� I �`�I a ���6G '�.. <Glo Z ;7111.1 [ 111;II I 1 , �'��\i r 4_ aW 1 � ��� `ff∎ �� O roc ; [�� �g `\ Ix c,.... LL 0 3 ((E bk p I / ow§e# 'g II ill* y��W r 3' ,� 1 I. `Y ;1: W 1--- e.t[I'd sii'.i li[ "lit7 /l+r_7I?� �'': I - 4111 ' All .■ i •■ 7 #41fit " , Nei - 1 L5 F p 1 ►r- i t 416• r---' 0Ic Vqiir , .. 1 \ J gym\ i =1� D ill r Q CC CC I i I--W LU � n I I; U C) II W l [ si ‘...4 —--— J g �1 cQ a) [1 �I I 1 , C z 1 , , 1` 1 • 1• 1 . (-,e- -.......D I 'I it III- 1 1 N� �osryn�r�3 �� FE �p��! 'NW-NY`JYa I ••�Ih�I�.H ; Ii ' aa1N33 SW"svwu fiii'Fiai 3 3LVaan-O U1A y1 rr 0 0 Q .►.» - • .O-.PC w-nc • —'4' -- --- r { : _ .. 1 I C I 1 O - - - - - -L-- - - - - _�. I , 4 d\ A I .iiiiik- \" • • 5-•••■�uii►� 'Nile AIIIIIMIEW' 4UU US wURII• ■••••r • -Tati7imisaii `� I .■■■■a• NaV■■■Ea■P 9 Olf J \r■■■b, �/i"1■w40_aq.��, tail 1 \■■1111•, .i■�u-e■■•■■ U 'IIIII .411111r rili \1111■■■■■■■. Cmi: p 1 \■■1111■ --• Num r. 1111■•I mum r■ . . I MUM . MINN \ — — M1■■■• ■■■aiaa■■m■aa.�, a © - . .an a-.s{ — — — ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■�`� 4 ■• NIMME•■W1 1 "�.1111111111111111111 . I � J ' m \ K w.:3 NW i Ill 7 h tz■.JO■C\L— N • ■ZEIENUNNICINIIII - N■■■FERMIC2 Z 1 f•IINERfrI J I I 0 b fin . ott,n z ID D f J 4 C 1 �� � ',..:1-:."4.-C,• , , 0 ,t:11 t 6lIOlLYA813 It 111 A •. �t . "r3v3 ��' ` I1r1:O ' 'N/ll—NYJY3 i 3 re tr I (p ! E C C _5 Imo;°' viiN» s>tv,"'GU !Q!llCio1 2 I 31VOd11-0801A i I I i 1 • =E _ 111111111111111E1 k =1:: A ElE3l _ IhAlli- i IPN'l I'I!I III! .-- = . A . Al ° .■ 0 ----, . H •• I_7_ "i-i I��1tL]I W .i.J J G 2 W r .i•. r 7 c.�.�• -1-1117 I1 {rmrrn 11 y. J ■■i • i II (1811 i�� e S M ;flllluuil „ I e t i 11Itili 1 I i i si... . 1, ■ 1� I __ .. M 10 .E ►9 i A •ffll1111fll �i it - 'I I . I LIf , ..44 !: .. H- . , , ...HSI. ILl! =11111 iii ' ■e HJIi �I 111111. kILt W I 1 I,!11111E7 W 111111 :{ ( . i Agenda Information Memo September 20, 1995 Eagan City Council Meeting C. PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION, PREUSSE ADDITION ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: To approve or deny a Preliminary Subdivision for two lots on approximately three acres located at 4141 Old Sibley Memorial Highway, north of Diffley Road, east of Highway 13, and south of Sibley Court on the west side of Old Sibley Memorial Highway subject to the eight conditions recommended by the Advisory Planning Commission. FACTS: • The proposed subdivision will create two industrial lots, one of which contains an existing accounting office. • The Advisory Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on this proposed Preliminary Subdivision at its regular meeting on August 22, 1995. The Commission recommends approval of the Preliminary Subdivision subject to conditions. BACKGROUND/ATTACHMENTS: (2) • APC Minutes of August 22, 1995, agesWthrough � Staff Report, pagePthrougG 612 432 3780% SENT BY: 9-15-95 ;10;46AM ;SEVERSON WILCOX SHEL-+ 612 681 4300;# 2/ 2 Page 16 August 22, 1995 ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION PREUSSE ADDITION - PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION Chairman Miller opened the next public hearing of the evening regarding a Preliminary Subdivision (Preusse Addition) of 3.05 Light Industrial acres consisting of two lots, one with an existing building on it, located on the west side of the old Highway 13, north of Diffley Road, in the SW' of Section 19. Planner Ridley introduced this item. Mr. Ridley highlighted the information presented in the City staffs planning report dated August 1, 1995. Mr. Ridley noted the background and history, the existing conditions and the surrounding uses of the subject property. Mr. Ridley further outlined the City staffs evaluation of the applicant's request noting that revisions are necessary to the storm drainage plan and to the utility plan. The applicant, Greg Preusse, had no presentation but stated that he agreed with the planning report and that staff was great to work with and very helpful in putting this proposal together. Mr, Preusse stated that his only comment would be that the planning process takes much to much time. No discussion was had by the Commission members. Member Isberg moved; Burdorf seconded, a motion to recommend approval of a Preliminary Subdivision (Preusse Addition) of 3.05 Light Industrial acres consisting of two lots, one with an existing building on it, located on the west side of the old Highway 13, north of Diffley Road, in the SW% of Section 19, subject to the following conditions: Standard Conditions 1. The developer shall comply with these standard conditions of plat approval as adopted by Council on February 3, 1993: Al, B1, B2, B3, Cl, C2, C4,D1,E1, F1, Gl, and Hi. 2. The applicant shall plat the property. • Right-Of-Way 3. Preliminary subdivision approval is subject to the 50' wide vacation of old Sibley Memorial Highway right-of-way. 4. Vacation of areas designated to be vacated by the City and the acquisition by applicant of the vacated areas. c,2, Page 17 August 22, 1995 ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION Grading 5. The applicant shall submit a revised grading and erosion control plan prior to Council action on the final subdivision 6. The applicant shall provide plans and specifications for all retaining walls to be constructed. Utilities 7. Storm water run-off generated by the building and parking area of Lot 2 shall be directed, by storm sewer, to the ditch on the east side of Old Sibley Memorial Highway. Access 8. The developer shall prepare covenants to file with the plat assuring driveway access to both parcels. All apprpved in favor. • I J i , i � - PLANNING REPORT CITY OF EAGAN REPORT DATE: August 1, 1995 CASE: 19-PP-25-6-95 APPLICANT: Gregory L. Preusse HEARING DATE: August 22, 1995 PROPERTY OWNER: Same PREPARED BY: Mike Ridley REQUEST: Preliminary Subdivision (Preusse Addition) LOCATION: 4141 Old Sibley Memorial Highway COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: Industrial (IND) ZONING: Industrial (LI) SUMMARY OF REQUEST Gregory Preusse is requesting approval of a Preliminary Subdivision consisting of two lots on 3 acres (P1D# 10-01900-011-51) located north of Diffley Road, east of Highway 13, and south of Sibley Court on the west side of Old Sibley Memorial Highway in the SW 1/4 of Section 19. AUTHORITY FOR REVIEW City Code Section 13.20 Subd. 6 states that "In the case.of platting, the Planning Commission and the Council shall be guided by criteria, including the following, in approving, denying or establishing conditions related thereto:" A. That the proposed subdivision does comply with applicable City Code provisions and the Comprehensive Guide Plan. B. That the design or improvement of the proposed subdivision complies with applicable plans of Dakota County, State of Minnesota, or the Metropolitan Council. C .That the physical characteristics of the site including but not limited to, topography, vegetation,susceptibility to erosion and siltation,susceptibility to flooding,water storage, and retention are such that the site is suitable for the type of development or use • contemplated. D. That the site physically is suitable for the proposed density of the development. • (93(p. Planning Report - Preusse Addition August 22, 1995 Page 2 E. That the design of the subdivision or the proposed improvements is not likely to cause environmental damage. F. That the design of the subdivision or the type of improvements is not likely to cause health problems. G. That the design of the subdivision or the improvements will not conflict with easements of record or with easements established by judgement of court. H. That completion of the proposed development of the subdivision can be completed in a timely manner so as not to cause an economic burden upon the City for maintenance, repayment of bonds or similar burden. I. That the subdivision has been properly planned for possible solar energy system use • within the subdivision or as it relates to adjacent property. (Refer to City Handbook on Solar Access). J. That the design of public improvements for the subdivision is compatible and consistent with the platting or approved preliminary plat on adjacent lands; K. That the subdivision is in compliance with those standards set forth in that certain document entitled "City of Eagan Water Quality Management Plan for the Gun Club Lake Watershed Management Organization" which document is properly approved and filed with the office of the City Clerk hereinafter referred to as the "Water Quality Management Plan". Said document and all of the notations, references and other information contained therein shall have the same force and effect as if fully set down herein and is hereby made a part of this Chapter by reference and incorporated herein as fully as if set forth herein at length. It shall be the responsibility of the City Clerk to maintain the Water Quality Management Plan and make the same available to the public. BACKGROUND/HISTORY The property is unplatted. The parcel had direct access to Sibley Memorial Highway prior to the realignment associated with the upgrading of Cedar Avenue. EXISTING CONDITIONS The site contains a home that was built in the 1950's and was recently converted to an office. The structure is currently being used as an accounting office. The majority of the site contains a large woodland massing and the topography of the site is severe. The site grade falls sixty feet from the high point in the southeast corner of the site to the low point at the northernmost point of the site. • I III Itll- I I Planning Report - Preusse Addition August 22, 1995 Page 3 Proposed Lot 1 contains minimal grade change. The development of Lot 2 will require a substantial amount of grading to prepare a buildable area for a building and parking lot. SURROUNDING USES The following existing uses, zoning, and comprehensive guide plan designations surround the subject property: North - Undeveloped and a Mini-storage facility; zoned and designated Industrial. . South - Group W cable; zoned Industrial; designated General Business East - Northern Natural Gas Co.; zoned Planned Development; and designated Industrial. West - Undeveloped; zoned and designated Industrial. EVALUATION OF REQUEST The applicant has incorporated a 50' strip of City right-of-way within the plat boundary. The applicant has petitioned for this right-of-way to be vacated but the City has yet to act on the vacation request. It appears a substantial amount of grading will be necessary to prepare Lot 2 for development. The proposed two lot subdivision will create one developed parcel currently used for office space (Lot 1) and one undeveloped parcel (Lot 2). The applicant is uncertain if he will develop Lot 2 or sell it to another developer. Compatibility with Surrounding Area -The applicant is not proposing a specific development at this time; however, uses permitted within the Limited Industrial Zoning District should be compatible with existing and future land uses in the area. Mr. Preusse has provided a conceptual design for a 9,000 SF building Lots - The applicant is proposing Lot 1 to be a 0.5 acre lot and Lot 2 to be a 2.5 acre lot. Each lot meets the minimum size and width requirements of the LI zoning district. Grading/ Wetlands - The topography of lot 2 is steep and will be difficult to develop. The applicant has not provided grading impacts or limits on the grading plan and therefore, it is unclear what impact the conceptual building and associated grading will have on the site. The applicant shall revise the grading plan, prior to final approval by the City Council, to include grading limits, plans and specifications for proposed retaining walls, and erosion control information. There are no jurisdictional wetlands on site. Storm Drainage/Water Ouality -Revisions are necessary to the storm drainage plan. Storm water run-off from the building and parking area of Lot 2 should be directed by a storm sewer system away from the slope to the east side of Old Sibley Memorial Highway. L38 Planning Report - Preusse Addition August 22, 1995 Page 4 The topography of the site prohibits any on-site ponding and as such, staff is recommending a cash water quality dedication to the Advisory Parks, Recreation, and Natural Resource Commission (APRNRC). Utilities - Minor modifications are necessary to the utility plan. Sanitary sewer and watermain are located along the east side of Old Sibley Memorial Highway. The sanitary sewer elevation is sufficient to serve the first floor elevations;however,the basement floor sanitary sewer service will have to be pumped to the main. The proposed water main layout for individual water service and hydrant for fire'protection is acceptable. Access - The site currently has one access from Old Sibley Memorial Highway and the applicant is proposing one additional access point also from Old Sibley Memorial Highway and widening the existing access to act as a shared access for both lots. The developer should prepare covenants to file with the plat assuring driveway access to both parcels. Easements/Rights of Way/Permits-The applicant has petitioned the City to vacate 50'of right-of- way along Old Sibley Memorial Highway. This request is being reviewed. Tree Preservation - According to the plans submitted, the applicant will not be removing any significant trees or woodlands; however,the plans submitted do not provide grading limits or tree protection measures. Mr. Preusse should revise the grading plan to illustrate grading impacts and proposed tree/woodland protection measures. Dedications - The developer will be responsible for a cash park and trail dedication. Site Plan - The applicant has prepared a site plan that also incorporates a 50' wide strip of City right-of-way that has not been vacated. The plan shows the existing building on Lot 1 and a conceptual building on Lot 2. Setbacks - The existing building and parking lot on Lot 1 will meet all LI setback requirements regardless of whether or not the previously mentioned right-of-way is vacated. The conceptual building design on Lot 2 will not meet building setback requirements if the right-of-way is not vacated. The parking and drive aisle design for.Lot 2 (including the proposed right-of-way to be vacated) does not meet the 20' setback from public right-of-way. The ultimate development plan will have to meet all setback requirements. Parking-The existing parking area for the office building on Lot 1 meets Code required parking. Because the ultimate land use of Lot 2 is not known,parking requirements cannot be determined at this time. The ultimate development plan will have to meet all on-site parking requirements. oc,?3? • I afar I Planning Report - Preusse Addition August 22, 1995 Page 5 SUMMARY/CONCLUSION The applicant has not identified a specific user for Lot 2; however, the topography of the site limits the area available for future development. Permitted uses in the LI district should be compatible with existing and future development in this area. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED To approve or deny the Preusse Addition Preliminary Subdivision consisting of two lots on 3 acres. Approval subject to the conditions listed below: Standard Conditions 1. The developer shall comply with these standard conditions of plat approval as adopted by Council on February 3, 1993: Al, B1, B2, B3, Cl, C2, C4, D1, El, Fl, Gl, and Hl. 2. The applicant shall plat the property. • Right-Of-Way 3. Preliminary subdivision approval is subject to the 50' wide vacation of old Sibley Memorial Highway right-of-way. • -4. Vacation of areas designated to be vacated by the City and the acquisition by applicant of the vacated areas. Grading 5. The applicant shall submit a revised grading and erosion control plan prior to Council action on the final subdivision 6. The applicant shall provide plans and specifications for all retaining walls to be constructed. jJtilities 7. Storm water run-off generated by the building and parking area of Lot 2 shall be directed, by storm sewer, to the ditch on the east side of Old Sibley Memorial Highway. Access 8. The developer shall prepare covenants to file with the plat assuring driveway access to both parcels. STANDARD CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL A. Financial Obliaations 1. This development shall accept its additional financial obligations as defined in the staffs report in accordance with the final plat dimensions and the rates in effect at the time of final plat approval. B. Easements and Riahts-of-Wav 1. This development shall dedicate 10 foot drainage and utility easements centered over all lot lines and, in addition, where necessary to accommodate existing or proposed utilities for drainage ways within the plat. The development shall dedicate easements of sufficient width and location as • determined necessary by engineering standards. 2. This development shall dedicate, provide, or financially guarantee the acquisition costs of drainage, ponding, and utility easements in addition to public street rights-of-way as required by the alignment, depth, and storage capacity of all required public utilities and streets located beyond the boundaries of this plat as necessary to service or accommodate this development. 3. This development shall dedicate all public right-of-way and temporary slope easements for ultimate development of adjacent roadways as required by the appropriate jurisdictional agency. 4. This development shall dedicate adequate drainage and ponding easements to incorporate the required high water elevation plus three (3) feet as necessitated by storm water storage volume requirements. C. Plans and Specifications 1. All public and private streets, drainage systems and utilities necessary to provide service to this development shall be designed and certified by a registered professional engineer in accordance with City adopted codes, engineering standards, guidelines and policies prior to application for final plat approval. - 2. A detailed grading, drainage, erosion, and sediment control plan must be prepared in accordance with current City standards prior to final plat approval. 3. This development shall ensure that all dead-end public streets shall have a cul-de-sac constructed in accordance with City engineering.standards. 09C(C72- • 4. A separate detailed landscape plan shall be submitted overlaid on the proposed grading and utility plan. The financial guarantee for such plan shall be included in the Development Contract and shall not be released until one year after the date of City certified compliance. D. Public Improvements 1. If any improvements are to be installed under a City contract, the appropriate project must be approved by Council action prior to final plat approval. E. Permits 1. This development shall be responsible for the acquisition of all regulatory agency permits required by the affected agency prior to final plat approval. F. Parks and Trails Dedication 1. This development shall fulfill its park and trail dedication requirements as recommended by the Advisory Parks, Recreation and Natural Resource Commission and approved by Council action. G. Water Quality Dedication 1. This development shall be responsible for providing a cash dedication, ponding, or a combination thereof in accordance with the criteria identified in the City's Water Quality Management Plan, as recommended by the Advisory Parks, Recreation and Natural Resource Commission and approved by Council action. H. Other • 1. All subdivision, zoning and other ordinances affecting this development shall be adhered to, unless specifically granted a variance by Council action. Advisory Planning Commission City Council Approved: August 25. 1987 September 15, 1987 Revised: July 10. 1990 Revised: February 2, 1993 • LTS#S STANDARD.CON 3 I Liar , , FINANCIAL OBLIGATION - Preusse Addition There are pay-off balances of special assessments totaling $44 on the parcels proposed for platting. The pay-off balance will be allocated to the lots created by the plat. At this time, there are no pending assessments on the parcel proposed for platting. The estimated financial obligation presented is subject to change based upon areas, dimensions and land uses contained in the final plat. Based upon the study of the financial obligations collected in the past and the uses proposed for the property, the following charges are proposed. The charges are computed using the City's existing fee schedule and the connections proposed to be made to the City's utility system based on the submitted plans. Improvement Use Rate Quantity Amount • Water Trunk C/I $1,740/Ac 3.05 Ac $ 5,307 Water Availability Charge C/I 2,745/Ac 3.05 Ac 8,372 Lateral Benefit Sanitary Sewer C/I 19.20/ff 518.33 ff 9,952 Lateral Benefit Water C/I 25.50/ff 518.33 if 13,217 Storm Sewer Trunk C/I .04.sq ft 132,843 sq ft 5,314 Storm Sewer Trunk SF .076/sq ft 103,143 sq ft , 7.839 Total S50.001 • • 4((1 ' I IF 3400; ' •..,:•:,.W.•4..% —-- I . 1 14tkt• 111011 1 yo:, �'I C+cti,w I I r 31 36001----------18——.., g �` 4 • i I s -N a(2- —eZ,,A„4-. g, 1 4-. I 111 .- ,,. '1 ^c , I �,r,�4r ,'tom { t� `�NONTERE, _ ,' ,,1 r _-„'.4__4 ev_ ,.14'-. ISM jKYLLO - 1. - ' 1 1 , I ;wm `sc • ; 1 yb RD. _ — - --____ SLVER BELL __ 4 -_- SLVER BELL — Qv .:* 3 i in I )100...:Ippir X41 #. o. .:.. , - ” .- ` .,,� � a�4° �'1,`' c„.50 \ioorArit 1 P. 3p a _ D I C50 I a*. it.i• 43' A „.4.- 4,4 . m.....101:. •.. : _ A Al AIW: 4000 �� •n _ °�1 MI 1--"••■kilijal TAO 4RAtz 401110% LA ; . 4 ‘ . .,:. ■ 1 W I 1y� ;y i�-/ &� AR III 6.y �► �� LANE , 7.0 pro I. .. . 4.-• 4.. OP" V I 3 4„,...... 4( fly a .0. . . A'; .: iXi RO6. a ' • " --—-- J/ 7 I ` :I CORAL LA.i� CT. r 65 EW' r p Pi/ IDR[� w .r �; Serruv �.' :q • r _ o � J, 0 t� FILLS -�4y E 1 c , A It cc cc PARK �- C£DAR 1 [4\H: %Ned � 1 1- S SH W "I. , AK II �� �, ow:LI ARK �' 4400 , ,� _ ' 6;) a° r 48 l La W '` i5 68 y' /ill., ��`J � ^ 1 O. = wa �•f ERH DRS f�Fivirr .:.�.C� .,� .. 0 V 5•0°.°$. LOCATION • • . " ..I t.• ,•• •, --•:::. -1 • 7.• i/ A "-""' A•?• / • .. 1 LI \.P1 : / .,",, • CSC .:4.1 . .. ..":„N. • \\II A R-4 -•:-7. ".'-'4"?:*:17.-: ,,r ,LI-47:;‹,:\ -E . 'aii.:-. ..• E.7- ..'•..1 nr:-%.'``..` : ...,-_•,.-.....-.;••- -.71 _.1:4#.v.t 4: • WI ''' -.7.11.A-.....1------:.. .6::: . LLLJ:711..Lti. -- ZONING . - ,,,,,,,,V- • ; , .:L.:,' ...."-z..., ;;;•:.:.:•‘.1,7_-:-. . R-IC " 1 • ..s,- . • •- ' :: :% ..-,.:-...,S--...,--•,,,.._—__..1 le. I-1 (Limited Industrial) ..., 0.-' r 4.f•1....-,..;.-.-!_:._"_13,."-,/ ! . eii;",'',,'r1,F-.4/y±7i,,kC.--.:-.':n",z.i:rf;..'-...6;':-••'1--.71,r :,N.:....)......,.;.:f. - , AM - ..-,. , mama I ...--1 au sumo* 71 I Aye,. Z. .F--,rm rrifticg• xt smum7,,,. :-..... k P I II,. ji gr,,,FIN.: :, ',.•.•.,......-"*.:-.....: 10014 IV Y' Etki ../...:-..1(i!R411:1:::i I-Z,"*.s,,...b. I 1 • •sebum I! 1 cr\" w: • Cie,"' ".. I IL ! I 9 111 '-'•. '•'' '.,1 L -CM/1'##' `' , . :"--'".'"-• :.--,7 '..\. •-%r, Vit),V4'. ,. *-.....prr-s- _•-:1 I I MET ----7.- s. '••:`z1.'.. `,..;/4:-:;- -r*---4%!* .__ •-•!-- •--■". ..,....'..:..- :.?/-.7 . t''•• • ,R•3C-' •••••• ." .t I• . ...,... -• ".:-... - ... .....•,• ...-I. ,,,,,-_,_. t .7 ,:...j 1 , -,K.-..;:: ! I ,-.1 :..--:•:• .,it..2.., .-vs.N: . ..: riT •ri-..:•,..t -6.41-4 ..q.avr ?Pore--467::-I:— = --=; Fr( ... . . —...... , rr."--Y If 7 — 1■ 77..- / I.—-1 2L-1.....L,, 63 DA 7"--...m,•' .-. .--) • ,,I.. . / IND ID° /Asa 67\ J / • / ; 41: pl... . . ,,, COMPREHENSIVE GUIDE PLAN f edlio..... \ . 11111 .... IND (Industrial) I Ir : A .11,*•I'•• • • I . " f,/ PF I P"1 PF ...0. PF 1 11• PF 41110 wil‘ . PF- kilp 41, I V • , , i • ' I • p I l 11 I 1 t I a 1 Ia 11; . I ,i t^ — �i p R il 1 � �i I 1 t 9 3 1 ' 1 1i ' l 1 1 4 i. *1 i , t s rill 1 fr':1 1 s .-�• Q� °e 111! t ! 1 le li r__ I - I. I i .. . i 11i its 1- - ! . 11 1 1 _!1 1 • • �� ;it i1 i!'i1i"� 'I' III �ta 1 t. : F4! ii 4' �_ 1��� It •� �� !' ilio�� 11as a° Z! �Ii; ',lilt !a` °'iii:I.di t 1.1 'i 1 � i! ; i;�"f:itI iii ��11� A Ijf �i , ;e1;I gill! .t;i ! af! .1111`1!. iRg ili1P ii L�..�+ vi jitzJI 11111'11 l! Ilya! a!`t !1°9 ii • % \-11,11i•csK ' N _ - 10‘N)‘ •N_‘ %\■• ' \\v•- '*';` .11 } �\ \\ ti. \\.ii -1 e \.r` , \\X*\%\‘‘‘‘‘‘t■V\'•tr",\ '.I,S N N 'N E-1 \,\ ,::\,%;%,'`,..‘‘k,Ni■sti,"'“z-i-c, 1.c).."1•\,... 4. N. F•�I \�\\\I\ t\� \\\\\�t�`tt`\`�„\\t\eI`•K•l ♦`I•�. ► ' �1)NN• ♦q%♦ Cl) \ \\ \\. �`���\\ cam `1; y \ N Na, 1 �` \„`ti ` 1i1ii1t�i1i� �I� ' i \[ t /y a. a i . >— r \\Is; ,‘I.\,,„%.;' ,•,,‘„.,'N,, i;I 1 \III \ N : X CC ‘4\11.f\‘\ SWPY■4■ \ '- - .. .---Al•\ . Z 'ice \ — IW;'''‘,"'‘‘,%\,■%‘;::-:.7,-;:';:::-;-,I:1,1.V LIJ \\\ \i \ \�\t\\\ \..\\\� Yi+ \,\ l a \ \t \\\\ \•\\\+ •..I 1\1 ,N,\\\\`•'\\\ , , a. .--...,4 . \ \ \%‘‘ Viltg4111. i. \ a 1; NOUvlineltilII \I1 UJlma LY.IDSiuI n 11 1 rg - i. \—�/Lt�I.a 010 w..na \ .•.,\ , d '1 i \', —...— r .a... a • • , . (ti.7 ' ' 1 d II II I- I I I -- ` I ii fix^.7 — '1'� .g �i , III . iIi i 3 III! I 13 31 LkQI . + ±r' I b L. ih i1'ji!1d i 11 ilfil' _1! II 8 1 r{ i ,ri1 t, - in 'e 1 + 11 1At !1 1"i'i Vi iii' s: _ S Ei 1II1 !UII1 a !ill , l liaiti;tq it I Ii ! ti! 113 t1i_ ii ' 1i 11]]jj 1,-� Ei; ii" Iii ""I11" 111"1 iEi !_j f 1 r Et �, f��1�.ar � it1s f ! llIiithll il= .\ \N d 1 • A �\ \\ g• ~'+ 1\.N. Q1 �� \\`v.: � 4r + ' CA: rn () \.'s \ 4 i- f— w {4, \ , \ l c a CL ;� r \,\8*,..\\ \\,,\ • i if;OA ' '. CC X. \ . / J ■\ \ , . LA LLI -"v",'. .- Ii+ s.,'s. 7 i \\1;-.1 ,,;Cl r ava"Bral • • r ty.{`u — t�.,n—=w.r,= •`.\r. *0 it \- I/M.. f x1 .,,,,?(( .,, , • al iv — it I -4 4 : I I ., I .. F J1Ihfl !"� # 11 I: ,[ii vii i i y!i ll lid 1 AI( i 1 I II Ili tit 3 i It jji 111 i p iibi�1j ij�t ► 1 ••!llsi,.' i • I ,II j111" IliWil !i1 1�l;gis:i!jti1 ••ii --�— 1 I II!iiiiihi!1iI jf! li Itf i ,�;1 if i, �itp- 1,1, 11 gim„titiii iii l� of{i l i 6zj! .0{{ss Issji sl/= loss ii >. \\♦;ia 3EI; illl�$iit Ili hikiiiiillishiII i <" N,,,,.. .N. , • ' NN . ♦ \ N z \ j‘N ' A ' \\ �� r W erg? \ .-++\\ r , I� \`�\... \.� � �' ♦ `+ \ r IJ z �ti6°` +•z a M + \ \ .� / .�� • p E— CC \ \\\ ' • 11n Q (f) a. 4 ,l 0t !! 1 \■ 1`4'';� '• ,i,, gas ' • ' 1 Ili •s `�\ � �. • g. : � j III ." ....\/M��.nrr�.nr +�\.' W .ar. • t• • I • . t • . i i-31 (ti , • .- I I ii i I -I r__ _ _T_ _ _ ,. . . . .1 . I ; ;, i {i5 I., ' 1.11 !A + r r , 1t 1II p :11 • I I I -1 j1 1 ! l 1111111 c l i1 11 y I 1 I I. al !ij i ! V -./ - •r `= � 'M: 1 • , is so 4>, ,i ��� �, ! t II �� Of � i • •• • ! 11' ' I iL-- - I I : i'1i I , lb . J ,.1t >< + f + ]a ;�+ ; 1/If +�I + 1Iib1!W;liJ 11 t �� 1 Itti 1 + -ii .rr: { a ;i ii!ijIjtij'i r I-+t� ii t ili I y 11. 1 -I c:jl i:Ie:j!j ,,l 1tg ili�1I11111L� :I� 1;it .s' ;1 k Ili isi:i1 iiialii; f ttil Is; . • • • ‘' ,N.N,- "I I" liriNil I'd F' 'iniAiii'. 11 . • N.NN N i 7, A: N,• 111 -- I .. • i `•,j_III: i� 1..-1 \ 11\i'\... . N\ NNs., .. Ni.N..X,. 11 ' al \ \\V\ .. . N :. :N.t.t••■. '. 1.1: ":=4 <''''Ilt\d'w,,. NN. i ir...41;;;:kh.t.i., ..'N'■)H6 ..N''..'s` .. 0 \ N N N 0_ 6/) ka ,-. \ Vi\ ' " k - v-: CL .i> , }• w , Q 1'x••4 a \ ` ,� ; '•.� J z /1 v �` \,1 _.)� • 1� L 1 � N. 6E`. iY d ` \ . w ' i. it I ! � +tl PS , 1 . ii - t* 1,1t i \W t `Y(AYM JO JA L � 'r l j' rl N NCfYWY3d+NAIL weri4d30 _Y10S3NW1 • _2 Illii 11 I . IA), I.1_ ,:eau; I L +II ' ,""�,,ii • _ %;:-. ,�' t...• ,i 11 ' it •20 i i •. , _ -de::::?. .5.7) • • •'■w, .■,11■111171/1011.001011 r____. ___ --__1._ ..._ ..__.1 - - -- . - • r"."-P---------------"--- • • . • . g 7 It di I - ill 1 i t I . . 1 'i • - . . )2 111 illi: ' •i , k zi - • , • • ; . •. - • 1. i . • . iir 2 11 i ... ./ 4 ill/ - • 0 - 4 • i e• .• ; „..., • I Fi ;?: !II di • 1 P' -' • . 1--. .--s.....■__IL__.___r__., , 1 (.. ir , • . ./ , 1 • ,J kif ,•• lig g i .•,.? ,1 ; , e .. )I: ill i 9% '' ....... w.,a., ..........11 1.4I.• 't q ? ".-7 )•..)1 ' '' 4 ' • I 1 1.1: IS• •.: r ; i i , : II . • -,:-. u•i , r;k ; ;.'' 4 ..• J Pi f -"g: .i f i '4 x:: • . f.5 ii.. I 1 / s; 1 4 P` I • 1 41:3'0.:"./ • t.- — 1-- • --I I :ii',1:: •'...,,i.:1 1-53..'-z,.. . , ' r ;:r l' II: 1 I 1 :' k, '411. ill III 4 11 ..--11 ,•••1.k,. ' fo I i ' 3 . 4 ! ... ,..1 . III a .:;4 . II ".."----•A I i ' •,. : • „ • 1 .: S; .4i: 1 * A ,'i I- 2! g .: ll ---•-\"--4— --M • , ra: t i • hi • " Ilim /1 I . ; „ . . • , . , 134 , r I ,... • 4..c.d. z •:‘ id$1i als Pr I i :et, ••;:...,;:v'y''.•.'. 1 ;h i il 1 ifs Isle% a , . Iiiii iri 11 • t, ., •:.,,! :3;;.:,5-1••••••:.,, / 1 1 „zi 13-1„ • ..% :.-- - -1) ., ; •- - 3 ': . '••7!..:.•• " t f :1• (- i-fali1/4/t '11 in .• '•:•:.P.O.';'.* ".j.' it4Z.,:lir Vi.` 1. mg . • .: f.: • ' e•-.!•114.fi.: A ....1,5 v whi I ii irl) . :.• ;,: , tii v :- ;1'13 II ,11 t i--■0111111Sfik.... 1; ii V. - ., ,i,,t-.,•-•;z1,. Rif : , • 11,„, A i. .. k ; ' -• ::P - • P•- •1:•i'..;;;'si- ' -til ji r•li i ..- 4.. .tt. . e. !i■ ! '.;..:!.Or ni fi. f li 4' I , = 1. ::',2: ;q:=-:- 4, ti ); •viii , 11101 11 ., r..ii ',.:!;.!t;114' ■ 8 11111.11 arIIN 1 :.::: •F '' •..•11,15 ',-Vi; I. •I i .3 el 1 •'I„..., • .-'s l't '1?,..4..i...14?" v r Pillri' 111.. b ,..: ...:,•,...t:,- .,. 71.. e i i , ..., i , ••-. : N,. .:0.2 I , 4• \VI!:.! ' ''‘• • . • 11' t'llf?Iii,iiii ?II .A,:i li iiiili a • k,`0‘,.'"v*.., , .,••••1/4 A.... %•••.\..4.'....?S.!....:, i ••,‘ ;,-t > \. ss,...• • N ' . ‘ ■\■.:,'.t,i-,'.. '•■••st , .Li 1. ' :. 0.,t‘ . a‘ .• v.. N. :\;:, \., ..‘ , . . • j .5- I I,...,..., . , I %'..:,.k • / ,‘... ''' . • = ) 1 *•5; II 1,'<1.••‘ I .1 I:.../. e 1.2%■.':('''''I.' ' I4.•••'. • f !- Z ; \ ,:st-,i'.: . •- .•.t; • I, - s ''...! • "•'-, ' .• .. ........ . . • 0 , , .. , „„ /..-: . •.. . •\,'..s. ,. ..,..\. ,‘, •■ 1 .. •.•,-.• • • • i FM C:21 1--I E—I ...,‘,. \\•.,\. ‘',.4. ‘ 'is - . ...,,s .. ;.4•1•6 ',.s.' ,• ‘ ' •S,_, • '. . I ' ......... . .... ...... . . ;.....■•••■•• • i'' 41.(:...... :V., V,•• s:-.'\ \. • ...... .......S.•;,..\'.., gj,'•:, . . P•8 .. ...:. • .i.• • .N ' •‘ •‘1''\;:••' ••••••••••.'k •'i• " •• •••.' • ' . • .''-' i . ;1," .• '' .L•.'■ • • ..s•i . 'e\ :••■ '••• % \ '‘OZ:',‘ st."..• / ;.......:.• • ■ • s ' "t4 \,‘ ', \% •N,• •k#4.. •••■•,„.,, "k• •, 1 t ..... 1 ' ..-st). .:41111r,•4,%`.. •-et, • ‘••%.', •\4%._` N.:ZW• :-.AV ' i r,,..*,..vg. - i • t, -.- ••1.,.......v..„.,.,....--?.. -,,,...::„.1. , •- ,../.,.........—.,, I• ,. ..`....,, . .,',, .. %. .,. . A. ■A .••N, N. ,•••: ,'IP i,4/.. i • •• '4.•••••4441.p.'',..., • . • %\ s .% %\ '. : .... • -..")‘• • Y 4.:-1. .... • • .,. .. -. 4 -- •.kr. LI: u) . • . f., .,...., ■ .. 0 V) ' '; ..'.'... ..",''., ...\k.:.t.':...:'..;‘'■-''.,1,.. ...,"61 4 I ,` N.'. . 'Z'...., : .! . • ., &.•\..•■ •1• . II• . 4 .4.•!I:11/4\ . • . 0 k k ■ . , , \ % r ,.1 .. . Z a- fa., • ••'. • ••• L ■ • • I *.k*. -'• •••.••.1:.... . • . < • '••N . 4) \•I''• .\-! 'N ':.\ • I !r-r.;_„,..p• - \• •., . . i>-- • 4 Nk ‘•.‘,N • Nr•-• ' . A s..I) •-:••...•• . O. `...%, , 1:Z1t•-•... •. !-“.- •' .;;A . . . . . < • • ,:,, ,% •.-::,-..,. ._•..:!,..4,4 %, / • — • ■ C.1:.:i •..": . ‘• ,' N` •:. s..`,..,.....*--••-:: .1 ...... . ''•'::; .'■•- .\ '\ -....■ 1; .1:... • . ,:. i . A• • • \ I ,, . • ...- i iil. s, \ " \■• . Z .t.y,..1 .. . .• . <lui ' ..j,-t-i•\d I IN ti 1 . . X CC .7!" d 1111,thi All:li a . , \ •64fiV:"`• ' .- • • ' . . CD CL ".;e: . 1.4 rill 4 il I 11;114 .. .- .../ *.-!...,'.....‘ •,' 2. r'• V. g. - • • ...,_.-. .3.4•4 0:94''e+‘ II2.‘,..ti.sr0e/ • - .1 • . . i Ill gill iillik 11111 OP 1114111 . . •,.k •°kit.,,.• , NI'..1 I.:.' • • • • •I , • ' •.) ' I•••-lf-7."..% • ..ie !hill kilil . •,••• • )•• , i,•••• . • . — • . Si " • • . • • ' • . . Al 0 • • -S. ,. „ .. . .._ . . • 40 • I: • . 3 . . . .., 1 • 1 • . igia . .imw 1 I . .. ...:,...,,, •4 I, .. .. , . _ • 1 . • . - • '-Ass •"f' . • • 1 . . • . . _ im, 1. • • J .4 I-5_1i 11.11mi it . , • • , ..... . . ' . . ' '-iiii•P'. ' " I , • •'''"--.. - - — •• . .....- . .. . .. • . : pi • 1 • • . . ' . .. . , .. .. . ••• .. . . . .•• ' 2 . . • , • )t L.. - • " --)4 • - , .• •••. . . • . . . - ' • • - . • . • I I 1 • ' . .1___ _ T _ t r LI I ( •-e •I i i1i, itif ! i ill lil lilt/ - I : I ill oli !f j 1 ��.� 1 eh1li43 s i -i III il! R 1.L t'* _ , 11 1 .1 .• • II ii lit tif 1 4 i . i i i _il . 1 li /1J+ �,,,Pit; f il t1�t1; ;, s ,.;•� Y {i .II 11 ,i=tt �t �-t 1_!lphili � ;i} � 11 I � t tI � ' Ii! � 13 ; t1;J ' ; � f .. ' U! iu: ! i _i; � l tgw= l s ,'t4� [ t II 1 � • Ii1tiif > iiitilriii i <\ ,\\ w N / o N \�\ Ili . Z 44, - \N H � `; \• \ EI A \\:, . .. ‘,....,.....\_.,...,:N`..., ti • , w g n \!'‘• ,, 1‘ a- ' lla " \10 k"\ . , 41 ?�• � i LIJ zCe \ .• 0 la's `'‘ qq` 6", �� 6 • \ Cif `.tt�AY*W�An , cN ��►3;.wie� •y��CS3 H\ \td inC= • r • • F .4‘11:7qr5=11 .... • . .— — --r —; — _ , I *I1 d . ♦' 1 4 1 ' I rl 1113 I t al� • r i I •s Ili lad • ° Ott i l Sri I .. .. Is 1ji 1 � II If '11 ' !.,,M lii 1 , 1 1! � JIiI f 1 . t •_ i _ f l7 Ill! toy , .14 �' 1 11 1 i . 1tt I . • fil tom* 11 .. 1 I • 111 ilidgaili ji illiiiiiiiisilt4i. 1 • • • ;II 1110111;A s;j1111;siliefaNi 11 w 't- f I ii • {!g iJi!ti'ihuitI 1!g 11', 1: o kiistri , Pi p1 iii ;t� )a ;lii• 1 � Ji J jji �11 , I .•, ,I Usi t 3 : . 1 ,, c ,• ...........N .1, . \ :S4..:" "? 1::.t IliN,,._ N Ili • \s, -e.i.ltIc....N.::.. ... ...• , 1.....4 -s Atillit. '3V"IIA: _ ''.. I ,,, • ... N.. Qtsl . ,s :_"__:;.A:4%..,.•.. ;1„. 1•\\ _•; _ -Nev.. -X 1;111.1,, k� ��' \•• fi •;. ■W \;:,: t.. , V• 0 En 4�y` -:� :F 1111, 1,4 n'..� 1 .: ; ;=0. _11 1111:::: +v :: :: _. •1; 1111 ''rYr: \�. z Net‘', . . : I Li w ~ 1'�'iisl=:"::i'; 111-:'1,. (1) a. Y i t' 's:�'c•;u i1.„. o N a ! m b g t 8 ZL3 3tn3 Is-siore\g O 4 c0 oo Z. :::::::::::::* ,........177 +.1\:,..4 I E aw sF ____ 5,_.., w Agenda Information Memo September 20, 1995 Eagan City Council Meeting D. WAIVER OF SUBDIVISION - GEORGE BOHLIG ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: To approve or deny a Waiver of Subdivision allowing a minor lot line shift of the common lot line between Lots 2 and 3, Block 1, Blackhawk Hills Addition, at 1670-1680 Blackhawk Cove located south of Blackhawk Hills Road, north of Blackhawk Lake in the southwest quarter of Section 16 subject to the one condition recommended by staff. FACTS: • Both lots involved with this request are developed and there is no additional development associated with this request. Mr. Bohlig (Lot 2, Block 1) is requesting this lot line shift because it will provide a more accurate reflection of the natural lay of the land in a more logical division of land between the two lots. • The Waiver of Subdivision will eliminate any of the typical subdivision requirements of our ordinance and allow this simple lot line shift to be recorded at the County. • An easement is needed for drainage and utility along the Blackhawk Lake shoreline. The applicant has informed staff that he objects to this easement dedication. ISSUES • • The City Council will need to determine whether the easement dedication requirement along the Blackhawk Lake shoreline is appropriate and should be made a condition of this approval. BACKGROUND/ATTACHMENTS: (1) Staff Report, page$ c)SS• ,P51 • PLANNING REPORT CITY OF EAGAN REPORT DATE: September 8, 1995 CASE #: 16-W-4-5-95 APPLICANT: George E. Bohlig HEARING DATE: Sept. 20, 1995 PROPERTY OWNERS: G.E.Bohlig/L.G.Wass PREPARED BY: Mike Ridley REQUEST: Waiver of Subdivision LOCATION: 1680 Blackhawk Cove COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: D-I, Single Family ZONING: R-1, Single Family SUMMARY OF REQUEST George Bohlig is requesting approval of a Waiver of Subdivision to allow a minor lot line shift of the common lot line between Lots 2 & 3, Block 1, Blackhawk Hills Addition at 1670 & 1680 Blackhawk Cove located south of Blackhawk Hills Road, north of Blackhawk Lake in the SW 1/4 of Section 16. AUTHORITY FOR REVIEW City Code Section 13.40, Subd. 3 states that the Council may grant variances from the strict application of the provisions of the Subdivision Regulations and impose conditions and safeguards in the variances so granted where practical difficulties or particular hardships result from carrying out the strict letter of the regulations of Chapter 13. BACKGROUND/HISTORY The Blackhawk Hills Addition was platted in 1970. EXISTING CONDITIONS Both Lots 2& 3,Block 1,Blackhawk Hills Addition are adjacent to Blackhawk Lake and contain existing homes. EVALUATION OF REOUEST Both lots involved with this request are developed and there is no additional development • Planning Report - Bohlig Waiver of Subdivision September 20, 1995 Page 2 associated with this request. Mr. Bohlig (Lot 2, Block 1) is requesting this lot line shift because it will provide a more accurate reflection of the natural lay of the land and a more logical division of land between his property and that owned by Mr. Lloyd Wass (Lot 3, Block 1) who owns the adjacent parcel located at 1670 Blackhawk Cove. The proposed Waiver will shift the common lot line approximately 40' to the east at the street or north side of the lots and approximately 40' to the west where the line is adjacent to Blackhawk Lake along the south edge of the lots. Easements - The Blackhawk Hills Addition did not dedicate a drainage and utility easement around Blackhawk Lake; therefore, the applicant should dedicate such an easement to the lake's established high water level (HWL) elevation of 801. The applicant has informed staff that he objects to this easement dedication. SUMMARY/CONCLUSION Both lots involved with this request are developed and there is no additional development associated with this request. The applicant (and his neighbor) believe this lot line realignment will provide a better division between the two lots. The applicant has also stated an objection to dedicating a drainage and utility easement as part of this Waiver request. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED To approve/deny a Waiver of Subdivision to allow a lot line shift of the common lot line between Lots 2 & 3, Block 1, Blackhawk Hills Addition with/without the condition listed below. 1. The applicant shall dedicate a drainage and utility easement along the Blackhawk Lake shoreline incorporating a HWL of 801. /5(e uri ar t • I I 4 'ARKS I I =' Lei/SKYLINE D Y i I v ' DARY � • rT AL e�. cv I LS A a yLa a w ___L.__________ _ __,.. :x__ IP I c�P"� =i ;i MC pro ° �• �� ADOW.VIEW RD a w RED CEpAR R (-NO Q I r' ' 1 f M 1!F < \/ 4` . P OAKS R0. � r , 4. < 'C I Y TENOR: 1' u .NO DLR A u 0� Q cc !?:1 ' , ■ I ^ , W K 2 y W < = 27 PARK �ue� F 0 ER BLUFF .c PARK I iF I�'1y o CONALL� TUR o ih_ +_L- 'p0, ' PT. II YAW •/_s:�.....,...,....... ..1 --- , �r4 -- ---- WATER g 11 L'jzin I I I TREATMEN 5 p� ' FACILITY �o � 1 g 04% , c ' CITY < f �,� P° f, c. O I MAINT. 1ar,. N s.+` I �, FACILITY �' 4k • 1 # -1 BO :TWA .•+S I g I� .LACK HA SK HILL cil . 31 'RILL ROAD _.n_• _ll r. 1--- 1� - - or IN(}71:1!gHig:I� m , - II(`�7 I ,, G ASH: - I L 1 1? .2.04 r Pfy `�MONTEREY L� o . 'II3 !, Ar 4,q .2,4, 1 4..L. , ` mil' CO ''%,,- ,- 6 ,.EUR-1-PL. 0 C0. t 1T c•.i IAZEL ��S Qa 1 GqC•� i°• k.i If Ir.AVER BELL _ -_ SILVER BELL RIk _ -- A•yHA�iK. �Cx•I�I IWE I� AKF PI �\ u -- 0 W m 3 IIN(Ilro� `� .1 IA © ` 74. 14.., • , " Ya w I EILACKHAWK �Ak I la < „ PARK C n • + r we og IF vT 5 L �� . . `. ` ci • • -/MAY GF' ., $O• \II:m1Y0004-1AVEN AK • 1.P ' V •ORT° k. i PL. NTIPFI 4 01' 44- 0I � 911•0. C+ •K.n1 Avt 1 D NP'C' v'' W; 0 I i' • ,(A SA,,,,h1 AVE 1 • IMJRPMY .S C BBRO T(. OEERWOOD J •• DR. •..0 1- ,.STONE n r - .r. e-4.-rn.nwrc=,a-1 I r,,, , - --,.- .o LOCAT10N i57 . . _ ____ _ . _ ____ _ 1 , $£ c , gg €a pi QM 1! i l 12 i 3'4,14,11 ll1llRJ!1IL qr¢{ {E:; sI i13 '` jj! j + 4 t . _#a 1z" _ia- i#a $i R��s�i f' 1 1 c i 1. 031 _ Y8 � _ _ - J, _ r 0 y, ■ 0 II 9 Z. 11 a. 1 0 \ - .... .-- \ 3 ` W \ y 44a. c:::::1-9°-:::3_,....--8,-_-:--i— 4. �\�QL� •6.A`∎ _ , e4 \\ \ 9I O \ \ '4-14'.\P � v • 1 1 3,s c) c' \ - a 1 J •rte ``` 4. a / 1 m a > 3 .sw�►s 6 \ ry1 m t hi � \ J ✓3 F 1 -� •, , „ , I ft g£ p - I jil q g g i"'�s3s:•.9 ;$� =L a F ' <°�' o§ io U a c 11 j ci ER^ I �s o .Ql epW � O,.g.�p•b Wed . ! t § t. �Z'--� a ''; <�.,II .o 111.2 .224. 8 55.°be31E pV� o W i L ° <O \W..1 o E1i 'EZ u c u-V° e.}9Ya G� F. t w yp d m V wig d It ittld. . V W C 7 60 �p K„'S > `u`d g'e§•— WV:, cuog'o:- ° i— s C = : , fi Spq gv` o a §q°1 e-i9 Ali ,•• c 2 i n 2 L4.1'^ II1H11II !i�r a ����� L.t} i 12 l =gn 1 rat at • a Z . 1 ° 0 o ro 1 s S o 1 N-- m g - a O N 8 O N • Y N a _q CI II • 0 8 °. 0 .... 1 �c o.. 0 ID 401 F 4 U oo \ I o I Q e\ / \ t war \ \ \ i\�\ \\\\ \\\\`\\`\ \\ \ \ mr r- \\ \\\\ \`‘ \\\\\\ \\ \\ \ '%. \ .•� ! \ %, • `\\ 1 • _X11, ,_ I‘,'% •‘,_ % \,„ \\ vvc \\\\ s' ' \ a \ \ 1 \ •\'% '\ •'\\\ `—\ '\ 1 \ .q \` \` V t `` ``\\ ---- •‘x>'. \ `vim, %”'\,4\4 �� % ,ytc-- .∎ .,,\ `\\\\\1`\\t\ \••R, iiCa \ `\ V \ \ \ \■\ \\\\\ \�\\ \\ W- 0 \\\•\\\\\ 1\\\\\ ja •\ I\ C. \1 1`1 \ r. \ I 1 l 1 Q 'I ' la� -eV \ 4 4.. ' ' All, tY.:I• . 314% I 67 a1 � L.-- 3rs AP • Agenda Information Memo September 20, 1995 Eagan City Council Meeting E. RECOMMENDATION, AIRPORT RELATIONS COMMISSION DUAL TRACK AIRPORT PLANNING PROCESS POSITION ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: To adopt a position for presentation to the Dakota County Board relative to its consideration of the Dual Track Airport Planning process. FACTS: • Members of the Dakota County Board are pursuing an action to have the County formally oppose the airport relocation track of the dual track process and land banking as a contingency mechanism. While the County's process to date has not included input from its constituent cities or a large portion of the public, Commissioner Bataglia encouraged the participation of affected cities in the discussion. The County Board has delayed consideration and requested that northern Dakota County cities submit noise mitigation recommendations to be considered with the County's draft position. • The County Board has been informed of the City's time line for its position on the dual track process. • The Airport Relations Commission is recommending a city position and presentation which will reinforce the City of Eagan's advisory commission and public process and encourage the County to open its process to the public. ATTACHMENTS: • Staff memorandum covering commission's recommendations on page through mil . • Draft minutes of the Se tember 12, 1995 Airport Relations Commission meeting on page through J a 62 C7 Intl ' Ilo 1 dP MEMO _city of ea an TO: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES FROM: ASSISTANT TO THE CITY ADMINISTRATOR HOHENSTEIN DATE: SEPTEMBER 14, 1995 SUBJECT: DAKOTA COUNTY CONSIDERATION OF A DUAL TRACK POSITION At its meeting of September 12,the Airport Relations Commission considered the fact that the Dakota County Board has expressed an intent to take a position on the Dual Track Process in advance of the cities in Dakota County which are also considering this issue. The action is being promoted by Commissioner Joe Harris who represents the district where the airport would be located. Commissioner Harris has opposed the relocation track from the time that Dakota County was first considered as the relocation alternative and has indicated this at meetings relative to the issue. While Other issues are noted, Commissioner Harris' primary motivation is environmental impact to his district. Eagan is still in the process of forming its position in the process and is anticipating receiving updated economic impact data, transportation information and environmental analyses. This information together with deliberations by the APC, EDC and ARC and a public hearing in November will form the basis of the recommendations which will come - to the City Council in December. As a consequence, the City is in a unusual position because the outcome of its deliberations may ultimately correspond with the County's proposed position. It appears, however, that the County's decision should take into consideration the final positions of its cities and more public input than it has received to date. Discussion of the issue and the ARC's recommendation follow. Background At its meeting of August 22,the Dakota County Board's Physical Development Committee scheduled a presentation by SOAR, a southern Dakota County lobbying group which is opposed to airport relocation. The presentation was used as a springboard for Commissioner Harris to suggest that the County direct staff to prepare a resolution for the County to oppose relocation to be presented at an upcoming Commission meeting. Commissioner Patrice Bataglia, who represents northern Eagan, Mendota Heights, Mendota and Lilydale contacted staff prior to the meeting suggesting that other cities attend the meeting in the event that the presentation was used as a basis for Committee . Ace / • or Board action. Staff discussed with the Commissioner the fact that the City is in the process of completing its consideration of the same issue and that an action by the County would be premature. Staff then contacted Commissioner Jim Mueller who represents southern Eagan and Inver Grove Heights to express our concern that a decision now by the County would fail to consider the interests of its most populous areas. Staff made several calls to ARC members to see if anyone could attend on short notice. Staff also contacted the cities of Mendota Heights, Inver Grove Heights and Burnsville, most of whom attended the meeting. City Administrator Hedges,ARC Member Jon White and Assistant to the City Administrator Hohenstein A copy of the Physical Development Committee's agenda, packet dictation and its support information is attached. It should be noted from the SOAR letter that Commissioner Harris asked that they make the presentation. At the meeting, the Commissioners acknowledged the City of Eagan resolution, also attached, but the Committee Chair stated a belief that it was broad and general. In its presentation, SOAR stated that they have appreciated the County staff's information for their activities to date and asked that the Board allocate funds to support their activities in 1996. They indicated that they are opposed to relocation or land banking and that they are interested in encouraging mitigation for the areas which will be affected by expansion. They stated,a desire to work with other cities, but acknowledged that most of their activities to date have been with other relocation opponents. Commissioner Harris stated his position that the time had come for the County to take a position. His reasons were that relocation would cost the region too much, that it affects 15,000 to 20,000 acres of prime farm land, that it will affect growth and transportation patterns and that the airport site will be lost tax base to the County. He also quoted a MAC consultant who had indicated the need for new airports to have extra land for noise, expansion and on-site commercial development. He noted that even though the new Denver airport is in a remote location, it is closing two runways to night flights because of noise. A memorandum discussing each of these reasons is attached. The Committee did not invite further comment from those present, but City Administrator Hedges did ask about the future process and made comments regarding the City's process for approaching the issue. Commissioners Bataglia and Mueller spoke to the need to invite more input from the other affected cities before rushing to a conclusion. Other commissioners agreed that more input would be appropriate. The Committee then directed the staff to prepare,a draft position paper opposing relocation and land banking or site preservation and to allocate funds to oppose these efforts at the legislature through a contract with SOAR. • In a reference to the cities present, the Committee indicated that the position should also • address correction of impacts of the existing airport on Communities in northern Dakota County. This draft is ;;to return to the Physical Development Committee Tuesday afternoon, September 26 and will likely be forwarded to a County Board meeting soon thereafter. dce 1r I IIiit I I � • Action to Be Considered The City is expected to make presentation at the meeting on the 26th. We are in an awkward position due to the fact that our Advisory Commissions and Council will not complete their review and public hearing process until November and December. One of the possible outcomes of the City's deliberations may be to support expansion at the current location with mitigation requirements, but an informed decision is three months away. We will also not know what mitigation recommendations the various Commissions will identify for the effects of each alternative. Some of the County Commissioners expect that the northern cities will simply submit their mitigation needs for the position paper. At its meeting of the 12th, the ARC recommended that the City reiterate its expectation to form a position on the Dual Track Process by December and: 1. Request that the County's decision be delayed until the City's position is determined. 2. Reiterate the City's resolution that the County consider all impacts of both alternatives before making a decision. 3. Encourage the County to hold public hearings, conduct public opinion survey research or use other means to engage all potentially affected residents and businesses about the issue. 4. Encourage the County to inform the public in a balanced and unbiased manner regarding the benefits and consequences of each alternative to provide a reasonable basis for public input. 5. Offer preliminary mitigation recommendations. 6. As,a matter of principle, oppose County funding of interest groups for lobbying purposes. If the County chooses to fund interest groups, equal funding should be provided for interest groups supporting other alternatives. 7. Indicate that more County residents will be affected environmentally by expansion of the current airport than will be affected by the relocated airport. By distance from a runway end, approximately 245,000 of the County's 300,000 residents will be closer to expanded MSP than the Dakota County site as indicated in the attached graphic and table. In addition, because the predominant destinations - from MSP (southeast, south and southwest), the most populous portions of the • County will be more affected by expansion of the current site than will be affected by relocation. 'C 19 43 8. Present evidence to the County that there would also be benefits to the County associated with an airport southeast of the metropolitan area and that because of the complex nature of the issue, no decision should be made without full consideration of all impacts. The Commission stressed that their recommendation is not intended to predetermine the City's position, but rather to permit the City to form a position which can inform the County position. If the Council adopts the Commission's recommendation, staff will draft comments in this regard for presentation at the County meeting of the 26th. The Mayor or one of the Councilmembers may wish to present the City's position at that meeting. Staff has requested a time certain for this agenda item to facilitate elected official participation. Due to the importance of public participation in this regard, staff would also request direction from the Council to brief our newspaper reporters on this issue to inform constituents of the County's potential action in this regard. -f. stant to the City Administrator • • Y 88/21/95 10:21 DAKOTA COUNTY—ADMINISTRATION a02 • M"AOENDA" DAKOTA COUNTY PHYSICAL DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE • August 22,1!95 • WESTERN SERVICE CENTER . . _ ROOM L139 . - . 'r• • • 1. CALL 'TO CRDRR AND RCJ L CALL. - 10:30 A.M. or Invnedletely IoIlawing the Community Services • Comtnittse of the Whale meeting. • Z. APPROVAL OF THE AGENDA 2, pmortuG'ooN or:NEW 121.0y€Es 4. i► lT)1 NCE . B. pOtISENT/INFORMATIONAL . 5.1 Approval of Minutes.for the Physical Development Committee of the Whole Meeting of July 18, 1995(Page 1) 5.2 Botld Waste Management Coordinating Board Update, RORMA Environmental Management(Page 7) ' 0.3 Plea Commission Update,INFORM03TION,Survey and Land Information(Page 0) ' 0.4 Summary of Cannon River Summit,Office of Planning(Page 18) • 5.5 Change of County Bikeway Designation In Apple Valley to Include Plot Knob from Diamond Path ID County Road 42 On the Bikeway System,Office of Planning(Page 25) • • 5. REGULAR/PDJ.JCy AC ENDA rmmn 8.1 grange of County Bikeway Designation In Burnsville and Capital Improvement Request,One of Planning (Page 28) 52 Solid Waste Facility Menge for SKS Source Separated Organic Waste Composting Facility, Environmental Management(Page 32) 1:00 P.M. 0.3 Presentation by SOAR.(Page 36) • B. t:1THER fUSINESS 0. AJMENLI 'r . NEXT SCHEDULED MEETING IS SEPTEMBER 28,1995 • 10:30 AM. LIBRARY CONFERENCE ROOM(L139) WESTERN SERVICE CENTER • NOTE: My action taken by this Committee of the Whole constitutes a recommendation tb the County Board for Seel approval. For additional information,please cap 891-7000 • P:1200842 ' . • • • • ts•s5X 8 08-21-95 10: 18AM P002 #A'2' 08/18/95 +.;:09 F` 1b7.2 456 0626 F.HIAR/TRASBTRAI la1002/001 k57 . OAK TA COUNTY — PI4Yr!CAL CET'l-rA.OPIVIOIT COMMITTEE OF 114E WHOLE` + iREOuESi.FOR Cdjli IIIITr _REV ON --- - D1V1SiO14: - -- PHYSIA1.DETEbF BIV I iEE itC DA E: AtIeLIS2,1595 0WAJ7kEM: OFACE OPKARlitNO E3CPENDITURE: Cor[t`ct Person: JACK IbITiJlO CE Budgeted: YA6ptrotie Humber: 891-T007 kon•Budgeted: Prepared By: JOHN TOCHO ' . Other Funding: __ __ ' IN/A: ... ■ , • Public Cslahe 1nrom:t on s • (TEM: Preset ion by SOAR EACKGatIUMO • . On August 10, 199E,Dako County rived a latter from SOAR,a registered non-profit corparation based in Dakota County. SOAR has actively morn cred the Dual Trot Airport Planning Process since 1891. In that leer,Wendy Wastenberg,President of SOAR,request:4 an opportunity to make a brief presentation to the,Physical Devehlpmertt ' Cornrr ee of the Whole The letter is atb,thed to this Request for Committee Review form for reference. (sea Attachment t.) ••Aj ✓ / e• gr._ a Low J. Brelmf a,Dir •r Jack Ditmore,Deputy Director PHYSICAL DEVELOPMENT DIVISION PHYSICAL DEVELOPMENT DIVISION • .C7raftetEr21g.--L—L . ' y Brandt Richardson COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR • tt Jta8-22 • i . . 2 604(e• 000 036 2'98x 626 06-18-95 04:08PM P002 #31 - . .. . 11a I I 1 -- - F.Ri4R/.TRAs..HTRA1 003/O0 08/18/95 18:09 FAS 2:2 456 0626 • - P.141- "' - • - '� •�• •fir� ���• • • , . • • • • • . • . • • •• • • • • ' '• •.A.0 tta,Jas . • . • . . . • •• • .▪ ='1'0•'• Mt. Lou Er .ashexe .- '• ••Frq Wendy rir+• - fist. .R,,•l t..: ••. . • .•s .t• . � Maude, oz. ' ' • : . •• • roaming rzgn t of camet nii X,i this• +o =tree=dm SOAR. . • • /no.he fr�d n appot y to a&dst3 t tP ysica1 Development Cor-uaims on Axigt st Z.•! for the p trpo ; or dis ussing the status.of, the Dual.'13 :c Airport P. aini.• • P▪ ry. S :R;, Xi&k a re ter nonprofit cremation.b.ased.in.I) l nta County which • • • •s•xcorc tk:. sere 1193: Irks be the pri�v ege of many of us os�the Board . • to two appointe3 poetion in v,_tiol'+ it r' fer Mots Cotmty. At•thy ti ne ww, • • that• ar- srd mcm m world ai,tettilud he avallable for qa 1 ones: Part I"zc14, - r r,-- ;-.66gtir;"-t:ityann a calast g;hem Canrall..r ie ttag th City ofR.oseniaut: '. • .Mora P reittsa ling bats Ccxmt r be:. t. MAC Poky T2& Farce aud SU& • .• 1 d risoty Car.... 1 on ltport.Plag y a S le/ tint of SOAR Only one of=4 .•. hotzsvg,wou d to be rottri IS fc t pruxpos:.of a hid'5.10 minute pre,sr.�ticn. • •• >sai itsroration! &1, . e-•fed tia to coa ct m~sat 450-sue. Thank you j •£.s 2 me cv- r� • • •• - • �... Ifir . •• • • • . • . a083it Abler& fiwa.wrr6N•.Waef♦. ... • .. . '. • . ove 7 , . • • •. . : •• • •tieuC i ea. R12 41 • , . • •• • 000031 612 456 0626 •08-18795 04:08PM P003 #31 . I ; - G • • • city oFacigcin ' THOMAS EGAN Mayor PATRICIA AWADA SHAWN HUNTER SANDRA A.MASIN August 14, 1995 . • THEODORE WACHTER g Course"Members • THOMAS HEDGES CMy Administrator E " COMMISSIONER JOSEPH HARRIS, CHAIR CLNClerk J. VAN OVERlEKE DAKOTA COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS 1590 WEST HWY 55 HASTINGS, MN 55033 • Dear Commissioner Harris: In official action taken at its meeting of August 1,the Eagan City Council formally adopted the attached resolution urging the County Board to look after the interests of Dakota County residents regardless of whether the airport expands or relocates as a part of the dual track airport planning process. As a community which lies between the two alternatives, the City of Eagan is acutely aware of the economic, environmental and public service ramifications that both alternatives will have. While it is anticipated that the City will ultimately support one alternative or the other,we have an intense interest in the mitigation of all of the impacts of the airport's future. We appreciate the significance of the decision before the region and the Legislature and the effects it will have in the longterm for our common constituents. If you have any questions concerning this correspondence or the attached resolution, please do not hesitate to contact our office. We look forward to your cooperation In this regard. Sincerely, • Thomas L. Hedges • City Administrator Enclosure • TLHNmd • . l J MUNICIPAL CENTER MAINTENANCE FACILITY 1630 PLOT KND6 ROAD In. 4 3601 COACHMAN PONT EAGAN.MINNESOTA 65122.1697 THE SYM1OL F STRENGTH AND G •WTH ,, OUR COMMUNITY SAGAN.MNNESOTA 65122 PHONE:(612)661.4600 A4 PHONE:(612)6614300 FAX(612)661.4612 EquOI Opportunity/400.1- `C n Employer SAX:(612)661.6360 1DD;(612)454.6535 1DD:(612)45441535 - I - CITY OF EAGAN • RESOLUTION • URGING DAKOTA COUNTY TO CONSIDER ALL ASPECTS OF BOTH ALTERNATIVES OF THE DUAL TRACK AIRPORT PLANNING PROCESS WHEREAS, the Metropolitan Council and Metropolitan Airports Commission are conducting the Dual Track Airport Planning Process to analyze alternatives to meet the Twin Cities'regional aviation needs in the future, and WHEREAS,the cities of Dakota County will be significantly affected regardless of the track ' chosen in the Dual Track Airport Planning Process, and WHEREAS, Dakota County and its cities and townships are participating in the study process by analyzing costs, benefits, public service needs and potential mitigation opportunities, and WHEREAS, the City of Eagan has yet to take a formal position in support of either expansion or relocation of the airport, and WHEREAS, Dakota County has an obligation to support the interests and needs of all of its residents, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City of Eagan strongly urges Dakota County to thoroughly consider all aspects of both alternatives of the Dual Track Airport Planning Process, including their costs and benefits to all Dakota County residents, and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the County should support adequate and appropriate mitigation of financial, environmental and public service impacts regardless of the airport alternative ultimately selected by the State of Minnesota. • QTY OF EAGAN CITY coUNQL • is or Attest: , _ i • is Cler • C:::2 6*? Motion made by: Awada Seconded by: Masia Those in favor. All Those against None Dated: August 1, 1995 CERTIFICATION I,EJ.VaxOverbeke, Clerk of the City of Eagan,Dakota County,Minnesota, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted by the City Council of the City of Eagan, Dakota County, Minnesota, in a regular meeting thereof assembled this 1st day of August, 1995. • E.J. anOverbeke, City Clerk • City of Eagan • • • • S i ?7) a. K!� Id� wr MEMO _city of eagan TO: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES FROM: ASSISTANT TO THE CITY ADMINISTRATOR HOHENSTEIN DATE: SEPTEMBER 14, 1995 SUBJECT: COMMISSIONER HARRIS' REASONS FOR OPPOSING AIRPORT RELOCATION AND/OR LANDBANKING At the most recent Dakota County Board of Commissioners Physical Development Committee meeting, Commissioner Joe Harris outlined six reasons why the County • should take a position now to oppose the airport's relocation to the Dakota County site or landbanking. The reasons are paraphrased and may not represent all of the reasons the Commissioner listed, but they are reasonably accurate. The reasons proposed were that the relocation of the airport represented too high a cost to the region, that it affects 15,000 to 20,000 acres of prime farm land, that it will have effects on growth and transportation in the County, that the tax base for the airport would be lost to the County and that indu.ced commercial development will occur on that property, that the new Denver airport has closed two runways to night flights because of noise complaints and that either alternative will affect Dakota County cities. • While the City has yet to take a position and may ultimately support the current site, the reasons outlined disregard significant issues which ought to be considered by any agency considering this issue. Some of those issues are outlined below. • 1. Too High a Cost for the Region - It is necessary to compare apples to apples. The existing airport is a 3,100 acre site which can accommodate about 155 operations per hour under ideal circumstances if two new runways are added. The Dakota County site is 9,700 acres and has an initial capacity of about 270 operations per hour if all six runways are used, which will be possible under most weather conditions. • If the expanded current airport is not adequate in ten, twenty or thirty years and the region needs to buy developed areas adjacent to the existing site to accommodate more runways, the relocation site will have been a bargain. For example,the 4,500 acres which make up Richfield have a current market value of $1.2 billion dollars, • ic)-7 t . • • not including relocation allowances, highway relocation and site preparation. Extrapolating to a size equivalent to the relocated airport would require additional land area currently worth $1.75 billion dollars, which is the current estimated cost difference between the two alternatives. If this is even a remote possibility, then landbanking would be the region's insurance policy against the need to revisit this process at a time when the alternatives are even farther away and more expensive. 2. Affects 15,000-20,000 Acres of Prime Farm Land -The effects on farm land relate to the actual area necessary for the airport. Farming itself is extremely compatible with adjacent airport operations because it keeps land in production with relatively low concentrations of workers. It involves loud, heavy machinery itself and is less affected by other noise sources. Dakota County has not opposed the urbanization of vast areas of prime farm land which have caused it to be the most rapidly growing county in the state. Urbanization in Dakota County has absorbed far more than the 9,700 acres for the proposed site in less time than is anticipated for the development of the airport • itself. 3. Affects on Growth and Transportation While the costs of infrastructure should be borne in an equitable way by the region and the state if the airport is moved, Dakota County has not opposed growth and development and transportation improvements in the past. Dakota County communities have all dealt with the phenomenon of being "south of the river,"with the downtowns, 494,the airport and other economic engines on the other side. The induced development of the airport would shift the center of the metropolitan region to the southeast and make Dakota County an even bigger'player in the region than it has become to date.' 4. Lost Tax Base to the County/Commercial Development on Excess Airport Land - Certainly the 9,700 acres for the site itself will be publicly owned, but in the negotiations surrounding the Dual Track Process, that does not mean that it cannot contribute to cost of services for the local jurisdictions. In addition, it is reasonable to assume that substantial commercial development will occur on the site, but that especially should be expected to contribute to the local jurisdictions. Even if the scenario presented were to occur, the induced development along the Highway 55 corridor and other areas of the county would more than offset the taxes lost on 9,700 acres currently taxed as agricultural homesteaded property,the lowest rate category in the state. 5. Denver's Closing of Two Runways to Night Flights There are fewer operations at night than at any time in the airport day. It is reasonable to use the runways which will affect the fewest people in those time periods when it is possible. • riisir I I � 6. Either Alternative Will Affect Dakota County Cities - Of the two alternatives, more Dakota County residents will be affected environmentally by the expansion of MSP than would be affected by relocation. Because the predominant destinations from Minneapolis-St. Paul are southeast, south and southwest, Dakota County residents will be affected more as long as the airport is north of the County. Be that as it may, the County's primary focus should be on mitigation and compensation for all effects regardless of the alternative chosen. Despite the variety of reasons given, the primary reason for Commissioner Harris' opposition to an airport in eastern Dakota County is environmental. Equal weight for all impacts on all constituents, or the majority, of the constituents, should determine the County's position when the best available information and full public input is in hand. • • • • • 0-7 3 . Board of Commissioners . County Commissioner Districts,Board of Commissioners,Committees of the Whole,Meetings,and Appointments. . EST LILYDALE ST. PAUL • ' - r �+""�' ST PAUL ' YETiDOTA . . ,,,:_bi DlSTQICT 2 iiii • aw - • 3 �� D r ' SCI LAI D4ff014 COUNTY iimam I Oa Cc JSSIONEI DISTIUCTS A, Flo GROVE • fiVi IEIaRS - - ,1 r- , ..i raggebi ofsirLie 1 : r.egp. , L.■.. s i 11111116,11r'T T 1 • nun= VALL. 11 NGS rit 11 a j a Ith , __ compmel 8 'i p ,1 1 1_1-1 . 1 1 1 D,STIR C • I VERMILLION RAVENNA SPIRE I ,_ A u I -- v I 1 1 ( � - 4ri CT 9'� - -- -- ------I I --si- rl MI a , I CASTLE ROCK WIPTON I DOUGLAS t I ' • I , I -- -- ,------1------ — . e i i i SQ07A . 'I iREEltVALE - I c• •; • • t IATERFORD I • • . • .ii:27 - SCRTWIELD ' Dakota County Population by proximity to Airport Alternative (1994 Estimates) Closer to Expanded MSP Closer to New Airport Apple Valley 38,261 Burnsville 53,363 Eagan 54,957 • Lilydale 542 • Mendota 166 M ndota Heights 10,466 South St. Paul 20,235 West St. Paul 19,304 Inver Grove Heights 22,000 2,332 Lakeville 20, 000 10, 149 Rosemount - 7,000 3,478 Farmington 6,574 Hastings 16,143 Townships 13,709 Totals 246,294 (82%) 52,385 (18%) Dakota County 298, 679 41;17C- _ — _ __ _ . . _ __ _ . . 1 /96- • E�S ; County Board to. take:stand on airport •relocation issue • By EVELYN HOOVER agreed, saying the board shouldn't reach a conclusion Now that many cities in Da- before the issue is discussed. "I kota County have developed a think that we owe these people • position on the proposed new an opportunity to come to a airport, the County Board plans Meeting and;give us their opin- • to enter the debate. ion,".he added. - On Sept. 26, the board will But Commissioner Joe Harris • meet as the Physical Devel- and other commissioners said opment Committee and discuss the issue"had a fair amount of its position on the dual-track discussion" at the last.commit- airport planning process. tee meeting. They said the And if the Sept. 5 mini- language used to give staff di- debate is any indication, de- rection on the issue shouldn't • veloping a position won't be an matter since the board would easy task. be discussing the issue in The direction to staff on the depth at the Physical Devel- airport issue was part of the opment Committee meeting. board's consent agenda but Despite that, the board - was pulled off consent by adopted new language to use . Commissioner Patrice Bataglia for providing staff direction. for discussion. • The new language directs staff j Bataglia objected to some of to develop a position paper es- • the language in the memo pro- • tablishing the board's "position viding staff direction on the on" the relocation and on • • issue. The memo stated that landbanking and to consider •the position paper should the "pros and cons"of SOAR's "establish the board's opposi- request for funds. tion" to the airport relocation, Although the county has been - the board's "opposition to • monitoring the airport issue, it landbanking" and consider us- has taken no formal position on ing existing funds to "contract the potential relocation of the with SOAR (Stop Our Airport airport to a site in eastern Da- • • Relocation) to forward the kota County near Hastings. • county's position" on the air- - The issue came to the fore- port issue. front Aug. 22 when SOAR and Although Bataglia said she representatives of several ' isn't aware of differing views northern Dakota County cities among cities in Dakota attended the Physical Devel- County, she said she didn't opment Committee meeting to think the county should make a discuss the airport issue. statement before testimony is The' Sept. 26 committee , heard on The issue at the meeting will be held following Physical Development Corn-• the conclusion of the Commu- ' mittee meeting Sept. 26 • . nity Services Committee meet- t "I would just be, I think, a bit ing, which begins at 9 a.m. cautious in terms of what we're Both meetings will be held at presenting to.the public," she the Dakota County Western explained. - Service Center in Apple Val- Commissioner Steve Loeding • ley• • . 76) alit t � Subject to Approval MINUTES OF THE EAGAN AIRPORT RELATIONS COMMISSION September 12, 1995 A regular meeting of the Eagan Airport Relations Commission was held on Tuesday, September 12,1995 at 7:00 p.m. Present were Pat Todd,Lois Monson,Bob Cooper,Mike Schlax,Jonathan White, Jane Vanderpoel and Lance Staricha. Also present were Assistant to the City Administrator Hohenstein, Commissioners Jim Mueller and Patrice Bataglia of Dakota County. Absent was Steve Soderling. AGENDA Upon motion by Cooper, seconded by Schlax, the agenda was approved as presented. All members voted in approval. Hohenstein Introduced Dakota County Commissioner Jim Mueller and stated that he was present to discuss the pending consideration by Dakota County of an airport position and suggested moving New Business to be heard first. Schlax moved to discuss New Business before Approval of Minutes, seconded by White, all members voted in favor, except for Staricha and Cooper who voted against. NEW BUSINESS A. Dual Track Airport Planning Process- Hohenstein reviewed a memo that Informed the commission of the activities of the citizen's lobbying group SOAR and their efforts to prevent airport relocation, as well as the push by Dakota County Commissioner Harris to pass a resolution for the County to oppose relocation of the airport. He stated that the presentation to the County was not shown as an action item but, based upon it, commissioners will be considering taking a position on the dual track planning process in the near future. It was determined that it would be continued to the next Dakota County Board's Physical Development Committee meeting in September. Then,depending on their action, it will go before the County Board. Since the commission is reviewing a dual track position It's not anticipated that the City Council will be taking a position until sometime in December. As a consequence,the action by the County Is premature to that time frame. The Issue before the group is to provide input to that decision making process. Schlax stated that this seemed to come out of the blue and asked Mr. Mueller to give background on how this came to be so quickly. Mr. Mueller stated that he believes Mr. Harris was approached by SOAR and the pressure was put on him so he went ahead with it. Mr. Mueller stated that he's before the commission to get their input. Cooper asked Mr. Mueller If this was a result of the article In the This Week newspaper • concerning the Dakota Board getting Involved In the selection of the airport. Mr. Mueller responded that he was not aware that It was. Hohenstein stated the first issue before the commission was whether to take a position at all in this regard. The second question is if they do, what form should that position be in since the • commission Is still In the process of forming a recommendation to the City Council. a 4.7 4#11? ARC Minutes/September 12, 1995 Page 2 White stated that It's Important to survey the citizens to find out what they think. They need to educate the public about the actual affects of the airport to surrounding areas. The process needs to be slowed down. It seems like It's being railroaded through. He asked Hohenstein how other cities are developing their positions and whether it's feasible for the commission to recommend a position to the City Council before they have finished the planning process. Hohenstein stated that there are a number of cities In the same position as Eagan, particularly Inver Grove Heights,who are considering their position in the same time frame. Other cities who are not as severely Impact have not been as active in the process but could potentially be affected if a north/south runway were added or a third parallel were added at some point in the future. Hastings and surrounding townships have supported SOAR, as well as the city of Rosemount. Those cities who lie between the two options see benefits both ways and are considering recommendations. White asked how appropriate it would be for the commission to make a recommendation at this stage. Hohenstein responded that It depends on what the recommendation is. The City is not in a position to make an informed policy decision on a track, consequently, the commission is not In a position to say absolutely yes or no as to relocation of the airport. The options the commission could consider are listed in the memo on pages 90 through 92 of the packet and the commission could choose any of those options as a recommendation to the County. Monson stated that the commission reports directly to the Council and that If the County • has something they want to look Into they should be talking to the City Council after we make our recommendation to the Council. She questioned why the County came to the commission asking for direction and that the information provided Is not complete. She asked why the commission should make a decision on this now while they're working on their own proposal. Todd replied that the County is not coming to us with a proposal. They are saying that they are considering a stand and want the input of cities to help them make a decision. Cooper referred to pages 91 and 92 and stated that a combination of number 3-encourage the County to hold public hearings, conduct public opinion survey research or use other means to engage all potentially affected residents about the issue,and 4 request that the County's decision be delayed until the City's position is determined, would be a good option. Hohenstein stated that Dakota County is not going out soliciting cities'positions. The cities went to the County and asked them to allow them to give the County input before they made a decision. The commission would make a recommendation to the Council,then It would be modified or ratified and they would act on this to the County. Monson stated that it also seems to be written in a way of persuasion rather than fact finding. Hohenstein responded that the memo includes reasons Mr.Harris made for making a decision now and making that decision to oppose the airport. What follows Is a staff review of each of those reasons. It's not Mr. Harris' support of those reasons, in many cases ft's evidence opposing. Hohenstein displayed overheads showing impacted areas for both relocation of the airport and expansion of the airport. The cities of Apple Valley, Mendota Heights, Lilydale, Burnsville, Eagan, Mendota, South St. Paul and W. St. Paul are closer to an expansion of MSP than they would be to a relocated site. The cities of Inver Grove Heights, Lakeville and Rosemount would be divided but the more populous portions are closer to MSP than not. The cities of Hastings, Farmington and townships would be closer to the relocated airport. Monson stated that these are 1994 estimates. She asked when the new airport would be built. Hohenstein replied around 2010 or so. Monson stated that expansion of the airport would be sooner and a new airport many years away, consequently, that could affect those figures. Hohenstein stated that more than 80% of the county's population is closer to one than the other. Cooper stated that the crux of what the commission does is to influence the Dakota County Commissioners and we should be Informing them of what we're doing. He continued that MASAC is always saying that Minneapolis is more densely populated so they should be getting noise mitigation.This is the --6 • a f a r t 1 ARC Minutes/September 12, 1995 Page 3 point of our discussion, if we relocate the airport,the County could take the steps necessary to isolate the areas of growth and put them in areas where residents will not be Impacted by the airport. Hohenstein Introduced Dakota County Commissioner Patrice Beteglia. Ms. Beteglia asked for clarification on whether this commission does not have a position but the Council does. Todd replied that the commission will make a recommendation to the City Council in regard to this issue and they will make the final recommendation. Ms. Beteglia stated that approximately two months ago Mr. Harris put the County Board on notice that he thought that the County Board should take a position this year on the dual track process. She stated that she was surprised that the issue was presented recently at a Board meeting. She stated at that point she contacted Mendota Heights and Eagan to notify them of this issue. She said that she is very disappointed In the fast track that is proposed for the County and for the cities in the northern portion of the County. She stated she is also disappointed that a citizen group and a commissioner • would request that the County,who are to represent the County's best interest as a whole, provide funding through taxes. Governmental groups such as the County should not be funding citizen groups and she stated she will vote against such a measure. Ms. Bataglia emphasized that she is not at the meeting to force a recommendation. Vanderpoel asked Ms. Beteglia that when she is talking about funding for SOAR or Mr. Harris'resolution, isn't SOAR currently funded by the County? Ms. Beteglia responded that the funding for SOAR is to partner with them In contract. The resolution as prepared stated that 'now, therefore be it resolved, that Dakota County Board of Commissioners directs staff to prepare the September 26, 1995 Physical Development Committee of the Whole meeting appropriate agenda items that will establish the board's opposition to the relocation of any new major international airport to Dakota County, establish the Board's opposition to land banking or any type of site preservation that would make possible at some future date the relocation of any new major international airport to Dakota County and to make clear Dakota County's support for Northern Dakota County cities in their demand for noise impact mitigation'and also #4`consider use of existing funds to contract with SOAR to forward the County's position on the dual track airport planning process.' She stated that Hastings has already voted to combine and contract with SOAR for lobbying. The County's position should not be to partner with special interest groups. She stated that Met Council and the legislature will be addressing this Issue making decisions based on six.years of study. What does that mean to the County commissioners and advisory commissions on airport issues? What do we base our decision on? All the criteria that has been studied is for the best future for the state of Minnesota, not Just Dakota County or Eagan. For instance, the current Minneai olis/St. Paul Airport has 3,000 acres and the proposed site is 14,000 acres;the new airport in Denver is 40,000. That doesn't mean It can't be done where It's at but what is the criteria for that decision. We're looking at the future of Minnesota and where it fits into the world as a global economy. There are other options but this Is one Issue that we have to give consideration to because of the amount of money and time professionals have expended and we need to base our decision on facts and findings of fact. Schiax stated that the draft informational impact study that the commission has been waiting for Is due in November and the economic study due In December. There are five or six major source documents that aren't available to anyone. Why is Dakota County trying to make these decisions in this vacuum at this time? If a decision is made can it be reconsidered at a future time? Ms.Beteglia stated that she can't speak for other commissioners but that Mr. Harris stated that he's ready now and has been for some time. Whether he votes today and/or in December, he will not change his mind. One of the commissioners stated that he knew exactly how he would vote but he would like an open process to listen to communities. Schiax stated that these discussions need to take place and the whole process at the County is premature and should be delayed for two or three months. Vanderpoel asked Ms. Beteglia how the County has been preparing to make a decision on the dual track planning process so far? Ms. Bataglia responded that Mr. Harris sits in on all the airport commission meetings and he works with the SOAR group so he has been prepared. The County Board has not spent any kind of committee or meeting time preparing for a decision. She stated that the remaining " 012 w71 • ARC Minutes/September 12, 1995 - Page 4 commissioners are knowledgeable and have been informed as to pros and cons and Impacts but are not really prepared for such a decision. Vanderpoel stated that the County Board must have assumed It would take one side or the other on the recommendations. Ms. Beteglia responded that this is true. Vanderpoel continued that if ft's clear that most of the residents of Dakota County, in terms of population, would be • negatively affected by leaving the airport where it is rather than moving it to a new location, why do you think it Is that Mr. Harris would win on his resolution? Ms. Bataglia responded that when you say the majority of residents are negatively impacted by the airport, perhaps by noise or being in close proximity to the airport. There are those who like the airport where ft's located and want to keep it there. In terms of commissioners and how they vote on a particular issue has to do with their beliefs and familiarity with the Issues. Cooper motioned to advise the City Council to consider#3-encourage the County to hold public hearings, conduct public opinion survey research or use other means to engage all potentially affected residents about the issue and #4- request that the County's decision be delayed until the City's position is determined. Vanderpoel seconded. Staricha stated that this is too drastic a motion and is not sure the commission is in a position to dictate to the County what they should do. We should encourage them not to make a decision at this time and let the commission keep them informed. • Schlax stated that the language should be even stronger. He stated that all of the positions should be considered with the exception of numbers 1 and 5. Staricha suggested amending the motion to include all items numbers 1,5 and 7. He also suggested that on number 3 that the County educate not only itself and commissioners but also people who are affected before they go ahead and take a public opinion survey. He stated that people in Burnsville will not react the same without additional information on new runways that may affect them. Second was made by Schlax. The amended motion reads as follows: The commission will advise the City Council to consider all Items on the list°except for numbers 1, 5 and 7 and add on as number 12 - educating the County, commissioners and cities on the dual track planning process. All members voted in favor of the amendment and the motion. Todd stated the commission may want to take a position as to whether to support the funding of SOAR. Staricha motioned that the commission advise the City Council to include in Its recommendation to the County that the County considering funding to the SOAR group Is premature at this time, second was made by Vanderpoel. White stated that as far as being premature he would agree with that. He stated he has an ethical Issue with that because It is Inappropriate for the County to fund lobbying efforts in this manner. It's as if SOAR is lobbying the residents of Dakota County to change opinions. • Schlax asked if in regard to the Northern Dakota County Airport Relations Coalition there would be an advantage if the County funded SOAR they would have to fund this too. The commission could demand the same type of funding for this group. Hohenstein responded that the main question before the commission is whether they want to see equal funding. Should the County be contracting with a private agency at ail? There are two issues, whether the County should be doing ft at all and equal treatment for all. c? I • ARC Minutes/September 12, 1995 Page 5 Vanderpoel stated that it would be highly inappropriate and unusual for the County to enter into a contract lobbying arrangement with a special interest group. The County already spends an enormous amount of money for lobbying. She stated that the commission needs to take a strong position against this. If the County should decide to proceed with this they should open up an equal amount of funding for other groups. Ms. Bataglia commented that the use of funds for SOAR dl be a separate decision. If the County should support the funding of SOAR, that would not guarantee or ensure an equal chance for funding for other agencies. Schlax stated that this Is a very parochial issue-everyone has their own vested interest in this. If you start looking at the global Issue, It affects the County and It may end up becoming a north/south issue. Hohenstein stated that Ms. Bataglia's point is that having a broader perspective of a wide variety of criteria. He went on to explain how the commission started out on a broad scale and narrowed these down. Staricha withdrew the motion. White made a motion that the City take opposition to disposition of funds to support SOAR and that If that should occur that equal funds be distributed to groups with alternative positions as stated In number 6. Second was made by Schlax. All members voted in favor. White thanked Ms. Bataglia for standing up against this and encouraged her to continue. He stated that her comment that ft's a global Issue was looked at by the commission and It Is also a local Issue. Ms. Bataglia said that her statement about a global issue was the reason the dual track process was begun. It was partly noise, partly the Increase in air traffic and knowing that if we don't expand beyond where we are today,they are all relevant to each other. She stated she appreciates the work the commission is doing and would like to be kept informed about the decisions the commission makes. Hohenstein stated that there is a public hearing for the City's position scheduled for November 15. Mr. Mueller and Ms. Bataglia will be notified of the meeting. Monson stated that whether a decision is made to build a new airport or expansion of the old one, SOAR has been around for a long time. Schlax asked whether the commission would have a plan of action for the public hearing and if they will be making a formal presentation. Hohenstein stated that it depends on the action the City Council takes at its next meeting. e;7 $ 1( Agenda Information Memo September 20, 1995 F. ON-STREET PARKING RESTRICTIONS ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: To approve/modify/deny proposed restrictions for onstreet parking as specified. FACTS: • In response to observations of increased onstreet parking throughout the community,the staff prepared the report and presented it to the City Council at a Workshop Session held on September 5. • As a result of that discussion, the City Council directed staff to bring all requests for restricting on-street parking directly to the City Council for review and formal action. • Staffhas identified 4 priority locations for immediate Council consideration. These are identified as follows: 1. Town Centre Drive&O'Leary Lane near Waterview Apartments 2. Thomas Lake Road near Thomas Lake Elementary School 3. Thomas Center Drive near LifeTime Fitness 4. Rahn Road near Cliff Road Townhomes and Rahn Park • In addition to the publication of the agenda identifying these areas, letters were sent to adjacent affected property owners informing them of this review at the September 20 Council meeting. ISSUES: • If on-street parking restrictions are approved, it is recommended that Town Centre Drive be authorized 30 days after mailed notice has been sent to the residents of the Waterview Apartment complex allowing them time to make other parking arrangements. ATTACHMENTS: • Staff reports, page ! t'3 TI PARKING RESTRICTIONS RESIDENTIAL AREA TOWN CENTRE DRIVE: Mann Theatre east property line to Lexington Avenue O'LEARY LANE: From Town Centre to Yankee. Doodle Road SPEED LIMIT: 30 mph STREET WIDTH: 48 feet 24 HOUR TRAFFIC COUNT: Town Centre Drive south of Yankee Place -3920 Town Centre Drive west of Lexington Avenue - 2336 STRIPING: 4 traffic lanes -double solid yellow centerline with skip white inside lanes SIGHT LINES: Poor at the driveway accesses and the intersection of O'Leary Lane and Town Centre Drive -curve in the road on O'Leary Lane and Town Centre Drive DRIVEWAY ACCESS: Emission Testing -2 10-Story Blue Cross office bldg.- 1 Waterford Apartments - 3 O'Leary Lane - 1 Children's World - 1 Rapid Oil Change on O'Leary - 1 BUSINESS OR ACTIVITY Town Centre and Mann Theatre to the west IN THE AREA: Waterford Apt. to the south Childrens World, Emission Testing, 10-story Blue Cross office building,plus additional future development potential to the north and west for commercial land use COMMENTS: • This area has vehicles parked consistently on both sides of the street. Because•this street is striped for four lanes of traffic this creates a problem in the outer lanes,especially during peak traffic flows from the Mann Theatre. Snow and ice control are also restricted during the winter. With three entrances to the townhomes on the south side and five on the north side including O'Leary Lane plus the curve in the road the sight lines are restricted. Waterford Apartments consists of 24-one bedroom units and 98-two bedroom units. For these 122 units they have 127 numbered (reserved) outside stalls and 132 private garage stalls. There is one future resident stall but no visitor stalls. Cars are also parked along the three entrance drives to the apartments. It appears they have already increased the number of parking stalls from the approved 112 to the current 128 through restriping from 10'stalls to 81/2' - 9' in width. There appears to be room to provide an additional 14 stalls with selective expansion. RECOMMENDATION: • Post no parking on both sides of Town Centre from Mann Theatre to Lexington Avenue. Post O'Leary Lane on both sides from Town Centre Drive to Yankee Doodle Road. • • _ 02 8°3 • y - L..__ sr — - — -r-.- -= — — I "�.° ;//iii I I ( [ •~ I 1 , cI U( # I I ,1, I / - - — fig' 1 ! 'F \ I`'`I � � { r .. // rowN o� F� ,, I I ..�.o I i ro „'� °`�, I I ,u. /1 CL..) I i oarrroM I ( F`Fyr ',y�yF ;;;.i�i� /`0,,� I i r A t f � ' �' ti \ I I I `�'.� ° °.1 1'''. I I I I TOWN'CENTRE 100 ' , ,• arm i• I it Z IL, Ir. NINTH ADDITION N,i I I;I _4.., rrr;r+r ,Irr.r,4 ,r L.. -w l ;A1I ',i, „.140',_ — —•— �I rl i-i rv. il'r, r y•nu rxrl', ,rlr ii,n lrr, �i Ui:rl.l?r'r'14 ri11'i' .r 1.� 'tl{.iia'I; rir.'r 1Ur �u 'r r r'rrr r J I'r.'I ``..— .�..'f�� ,_� rr�- -'.��_ _.r✓ 1 \1l" 1 'Irl li,ii r rr ± �.— — — — .— —. .—. — — —.'_ _,_,._ —.—..— _ —• ! ,: ,, \a �<`.IuLuL2wV:p'. rvu.:,li 41',y ;liTO •CENTRE'bRiVE"'"IIJr.rrl„,4WJ q,r,r;;rl :.,rr,.,r },-. •.. .r.,r�' % Est. I NI•'ON 1 i+ , roK'v � '' . ,•c0 ei'� ' I La 1 1 1 °°£,Gy y , 1 n I SKIT A I _`. J r I It 1 — — , I DUCKWOOD TRAIL — z .41 II — � -- — — — - ..,.. L , L �/ I ,ry TOWN CENTRE 100 TF#RD AODI770N ! 1.43147 133L1173 muff SW. 0 / COAT (�j�� / C 1 s,r� 1 w C\..-. • 11 1111 SAP ��\ an \ 111)j mo 10) I I, 1---6? 11000 v 2 Ali ii 1:;;:i.-LJ , . _L. _ 1 ..... i - .. , I, s _ 1 . 4Wotsorif-4 , 1 . i „ .... -- ._ ...„.... ..., ii,, s 4 , , -r DUCkWOOb T V 1• ••L. I. ✓((-_ ,, / ■ \ / Saw. `V = _..= ✓ '' ` — ` .... M, \Y ^ ( t V Fyn- ,o,, / r 1 W\ {- \ • AREA \ \ =.ate 4'4 ?we? 7 __ L1,� 1 .fl 1 I g •O I i Q ��? \ \ L Woo —s �� I aC`- I , I 1I Ir — -- I r RESIDENTIAL AREA PARKING RESTRICTION 'ti• _,,,,e / ,.. . 4ii , ,, , ,1- I I I 09-I1%95 MON 11:50 FAX 612 681 4738 612 681 4738 E:1GAN POLICE z002 l' ides s or■ lour~ C°e C... be-k wC' 'U ‘ CAD CLOSED CALLS NON, SEP 11, 1995, 11:35 AN i.��X t r 4*r berWrOjek page 1 of 1 q . CALL-TYPE CALL-DESCR LOCATION •RECV-TNON Auc�. VA `Z r ` r zs +4 9444 N&R 1120 TOWN CENTRE DR 014 92/09/18 16 9444 ACCIDENT-PD 1101 TOWN CENTRE DR " 92/10/28 14 9444 HER 1130 TOWN CENTRE DR 08 7 92/12/10 11 9444 PD ACC CLEARY / TOWN CENTRE OR " 93/01/20 15 9444 ACCIDENT-PD CLEARY / TOWN CENTRE DR : 93/01/20 17 • 9444 ACCIDENT-PD 1195 TOWN CENTRE DR 93/04/09 16 9444 N & R 1130 TOWN CENTRE OR," 93/04/26 10 9444 N * R 1160 TOW CENTRE DR 111 93/08/30 22 9424 ACCIDENT-P1 LEXINGTON / TOWN CENTRE DR 93/10/14 20 9424 ACCIDENT-PO 1195 TOWN CENTRE DR • 93/10/21 15 9444 NIT AND RUN 1110 TOWN CENTRE OR 83 93/12/19 00 C44 aq �..a,.�{c eS 9444 ACCIDENT-PD 1195 TOWN CENTRE DR • 94/03/18 12 _[[ 9444 ACCIDENT-PD LEXINGTON / TOWN CENTRE OR 94/07/23 14 9444 ACCIDENT-PD 1150 TOWN CENTRE DR 09 94/09/27 10 9444 ACCIDENT-PD 1225 TOWN CENTRE DR 95/02/17 12 9444 ACCIDENT-PD 1130 TOWN CENTRE DR /18 95/03/31 14 C144`1.7. P(oee<41 9444 ACCIDENT-Pp 1195 TOWN CENTRE DR 95/04/01 18OIQ ._. 9444 ACCIDENT-PD 1120 TOWN CENTRE OR 95/05/05 19 9444 M • R 1225 TOWN CENTRE OR 95/07/08 18 9444 N/R 1140 TOWN CENTRE DR 015 95/07/16 22 r„.4. s. Vour t'eorcd c)gsese--- 1 , • SEPTEMBER 13, 1995 • RE: PARKING RESTRICTIONS ON TOWN CENTRE DRIVE FROM MANN THEATRE EAST PROPERTY LINE TO LEXINGTON AVENUE AND YANKEE DRIVE FROM TOWN CENTRE DRIVE TO YANKEE DOODLE ROAD Dear Property Owner: This notification is to inform you of the City Council consideration to impose parking restrictions on Town Centre Drive from Mann Theatre east property line to Lexington Avenue, and. Yankee Drive from Town Centre Drive to Yankee Doodle Road. This item will be discussed on the September 20, 1995 (Wednesday) City Council meeting which will be held at the Blackhawk Middle School. If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact me at 681- 4300. Thank you. Arnie Erhart Superintendent of Streets and Equipment AE/nab cc: Mayor & City Council Tom Hedges, City Administrator Tom Colbert, Director of Public Works i:119blpanting.256 I II i 1 dI. I I _. PARKING RESTRICTIONS COMMERCIAL AREA THOMAS CENTER DRIVE: Cliff Road to Thomas Lake Road SPEED LIMIT: 30 mph STREET WIDTH: 44 feet 24 HOUR TRAFFIC COUNT: North of Cliff Road -5393 West of Thomas Lake Road -2003 • STRIPING: None SIGHT LINES: Poor because of driveways access and curves in the street DRIVEWAY ACCESS: Texaco Station - 1 Thomas Lake Centre - 3 Lifetime Fitness -2 BUSINESS OR ACTIVITY IN THE AREA: Lifetime Fitness Center on the north Thomas Lake Center on the south COMMENTS: Parking on this street seems to be a convenience more than a necessity. The parking lot for Lifetime Fitness is adequate for parking but the on-street parking is closer to the entrance door. The on-street parking is more consistent in the winter which interferes with snow&ice control operations. The curvature of road reduces the sight lines especially at the six driveway entrances. RECOMMENDATION: Post no parking on both sides of Thomas Centre Drive from Cliff Road to Thomas Lake Road. • • • ■ 4? g7 . _ N.uoQ+ •, Tom . \ . i . .C 9.......-.‘... _>3.2•I• _ f.4,14:p — — — — -- , ill J . 1 I ,� I 4 r ` a urn .. - r :2"w I I It' �. p air' I I Y I \ � \ � � ( I. 1■ 1 `.. ... `f w 9 23 � -' I Qo ,I I I I � ' 1 1 WE I f 917.3 I • I I [ I I I I 1 I SAFARI AT EAGAN ��r, ,s,,„, I 1 O — f I inOT A IP/ ^. '.7N I & I 0„ - - - . — .-. y ,,,tl" I 11 1 r I I ,, 1'i - ..'-. -...7 ... - „,'' / I I �pn�l'M ,i�d.�4Mwc' �'' M mr�'gm s�,ia�'b""r ,;r�1.�i Nl�k"'' I I $ I r// ;,,s u� ' w - J- — l 1 I r r /'II'i 1 /AT /i —1 �C\I�R �� \ - 1 I l�!� 1 1 GPK� I I r I t K 1 �� I - r I :;� II\ , ` - - - Ir - - - -I,� \ 11 : 1 . I —' f— i I \ I� I :. ' 11 1� I � I I i 1 1 11 Ejil: 4 1 1 1 I 1 1 J �� / . J _ — .- - - - - -- \ ..— 1 �- - - - - - 1-= CS.A_H.A1Q-324 IEF.-.EQ L - / 3 2 1 1 0 0 2 II 7 . Allr IS) sC-; ( _ r- — —— — — — \ �_„ lir ,..,..?„ -n \ lb. 0 er.-_-:1 ,...... f .. .. ... . \ .q I .. 1 I . \ , CSI • • COMMERCIAL AREA P'RKI G T ION AL"V"400;' ' I 1 u TE 11r 1 f 1 612 681 4738 09/11/95 ION 11:50 FAX 612 681 4738 EAGAN POLICE Z1003 f`CC, Ct'�"� Cr\ .r\Or %ft,.02.1,11rrrL. 4..3r V� CAD CLOSED CALLS NON, SEP 11, 1995, 11%63 AN pogo 1 of 1 CALL-TYPE CALL-DESCR LOCATION *RECV-YIOH 9444 ACCIDENT-PROPERT THOMAS CENTER DR & THOMAS LAKE R 89/05/02 19 9444 ACCIDENT-PROPERT CLIFF RD i THOMAS CENTER DR 89/11/04 17 9424 MC/VEH THOMAS LAKE / THOMAS CENTER DR 90/06/19 11 9444 NV & DEER THOMAS LAKE / THOMAS CENTER DR 91/01/02 18 9444 ACCIDENT PD CLIFF / THOMAS CENTER DR 91/12/06 10 9444 PD ACC CLIFF / THOMAS CENTER DR 92/02/07 10 9444 N/A CLIFF / THOMAS CENTER OR 92/06/11 16 9444 PD ACC CLIFF / THOMAS CENTER DR 92/11/05 22 9444 DEER HIT THOMAS LAKE / THOMAS CENTER DR 93/05/20 16 9444 NV VS DEER CLIFF / THOMAS CENTER DR 93/10/25 06 9444 ACCIDENT-PD CLIFF / THOMAS CENTER DR 93/11/16 14 9444 ACCIDENT-PD CLIFF / THOMAS CENTER DR 94/01/08 10 9444 NIT DEER CLIFF / TNOMAS CENTER DR 94/01/09 16 9444 NV & DEER CLIFF / THOMAS CENTER DR 94/10/26 20 9444 ACCIDENT-PD CLIFF / THOMAS CENTER DR 94/12/26 19 9444 ACCIDENT-PD THOMAS LAKE / THOMAS CENTER DR 95/01/04 19 tf ;;;7 SEPTEMBER 13, 1995 RE: PARKING RESTRICTIONS ON THOMAS CENTER DRIVE FROM CLIFF ROAD TO THOMAS LAKE ROAD Dear Property Owner: This notification is to inform you of the City Council consideration to impose parking restrictions on Thomas Center Drive from Cliff Road to Thomas Lake Road. This item will be discussed on the September 20, 1995 (Wednesday) City Council meeting which will be held at the Blackhawk Middle School. If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact me at 681- 4300. Thank you. Arnie Erhart Superintendent of Streets and Equipment • • AE/nab cc: Mayor & City Council • • Tom Hedges, City Administrator Tom Colbert, Director of Public Works i:119b1parking.256 cm21A0 ai it r • PARKING RESTRICTIONS PARK AND SCHOOL AREA THOMAS LAKE ROAD: Auburn Court to Highline Trail SPEED LIMIT: 35 mph STREET WIDTH: 44 feet 24 HOUR TRAFFIC COUNT: Thomas Lake Road at Highline Trail crossing -2772 STRIPING: Double solid yellow centerline with solid white safety lanes on both sides SIGHT LINES: Poor because of curve in the road DRIVEWAY ACCESS: Thomas Lake Elementary -3 BUSINESS OR ACTIVITY IN THE AREA: Thomas Lake Elementary School on the east Townhomes on the west that are facing Clemson Drive COMMENTS: A problem exists when special events take place at the school. The curvature of the road and the 35 mph speed limit compounds the problem. This is a safety concern when cars are parked on the west side of street and pedestrians cross the street to enter the school grounds. RECOMMENDATION: Post no parking on the west side of Thomas Lake Road from Audubon Court to Highline Trail. • • °? • • , / A " mi._a b._ Imo - ariat-Irs7 Xlarej-41rft 10 I 1 \ « I I \ \ � �`, 1 i i :ligt 4 "I V * / \\ 4 ilt rim i armor...0■1 NM 1114 3 I / / ! V•/ \ ` (tit�. v<1 �i+a� BOLDER R • , II II 1 d.,... „„,,,,„.�� \ ■\ ���` ���� ivy IDGE .. • \ \ • or riim l�y • \ 1\ 3 xr..4 ■ ‘ ( ,414f°1 71.11: : ✓ .. ,....... .........,_. ....,. /Ir. , �O • ` \„ � , , D < 4 O / f PM. a a l I - , - • ' \ is WM 1 1114-01 IS a I /' ' 3 �� i i 11 • AS LAKE EIGHT' • I Ott `' ��A ` I l 7v.„ °°° ' l 2 j <3 i --I 1C , , • ED� Q\ ' / / / d I I 1 � .1 a o, 4S' - \ 1 I D , /III I IN i• o, D ■ l I ' /I � I 2 �a C � / �O - / Q i _ ipfr RN s.i - V l r� / / ■ Gi I I� OMAS LAKE I�EI '�If, •Du ..43,.. ;MU �c' I t;!"� / ,end l 44* �4 j'■1 Q v. _.R�._ /32 a, lef / / '1S 16' ,�r% ' 7., ,[, \ J / 1+�1 `�� J I�:/ / ` r~. ` — + - hj +/ ` �l '� 9OO t fir IV '/r0 / / • / .-/■ Nws % ' . ---- I NAY AIWA / / • ''." / — �7// r . i I • / . , i . - a l \ 1 , ''V \ I. SCHOOL & PARK A � . PARKING RESTRICTIO ;,,', ;�r:ams . . +'ha. . '"' 1 .Ii it i I 612 681 4738 09/11/95 MON 11:50 FAX 612 681 4738 EAGAN POLICE [J 005 Rcc∎d as on `t'hta S CaKe. bt4u e r f*kvbur rl , CAD CLOSED CALLS MOH, SEP 11, 1995, 11:47 AK 414' CJ l Ft l a e/p ,+- pppt 1 of 1 CALL-TYPE CALL-DESCR LOCATION •RECV-YIDR 9444 Pp ACC CLIFF / THOMAS LAKE RD 92/11/05 22 9444 DEER NIT THOMAS LAKE / THOMAS CENTER OR 93/05/20 16 9444 M AND R 1530 THOMAS LAKE PT 1110 93/06/22 21 9444 M 4 R 1520 THOMAS LAKE PT 93/06/23 23 9444 ACCIDENT-PO CLIFF / THOMAS LAKE RD 93/09/10 23 9444 MV AHD PEER CLIFF / THOMAS LAKE RD 93/09/24 22 9424 10-52 CLIFF / THOMAS LAKE RD 93/10/14 09 9444 ACCIDENT-PO THOMAS LAKE / THOMAS LAKE PT 94/02/24 10 9444 10-50 MALLARD / THOMAS LAKE RD 94/03/00 00 9424 ACCIDENT-PI MALLARD / THOMAS LAKE RD 94/06/06 16 9444 ACCIDENT-PD CLIFF / THOMAS LAKE RD 94/09/22 21 9444 CAR VS DEER CLIFF / THOMAS LAKE RD 94/10/30 23 9444 ACCIDENT-PD CLIFF / THOMAS LAKE RD 94/12/0' 10 9444 ACCIDENT-PD THOMAS LAKE / THOMAS CENTER DR 95/01/04 19 9444 NIT DEER CLIFF / THOMAS LAKE RD 95/05/30 22 • • 1_7)1 q.0:43 • SEPTEMBER 13, 1995 RE: PARKING RESTRICTIONS ON THOMAS LAKE ROAD FROM AUBURN COURT TO THE HIGHLINE TRAIL Dear Property Owner: • This notification is to inform you of the City Council consideration to impose parking restrictions on Thomas Lake Road from Auburn Court to the Highline Trail. This item will be discussed on the September 20, 1995 (Wednesday) City Council meeting which will be held at the Blackhawk Middle School. If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact me at 681- 4300. • Thank you. Arnie Erhart Superintendent of Streets and Equipment AE/nab cc: Mayor & City Council Tom Hedges, City Administrator Tom Colbert, Director of Public Works i:119blparking.256 • . 62 V • I iIl- PARKING RESTRICTIONS PARK AND SCHOOL AREA RAHN ROAD: Shale Lane to Cliff Lake Road SPEED LIMIT: 30 mph STREET WIDTH: 44 feet 24 HOUR TRAFFIC COUNT: Rahn Road west of Cliff Lake Road - 3635 STRIPING: Double solid yellow centerline only SIGHT LINES: Poor at curve in the road and entrance to Rahn Park parking lot. Also a site problem at new private street (Jan Echo Lane) for townhome development on the east side of Rahn Road DRIVEWAY ACCESS: One at Jan Echo Lane and one at entrance to parking lot. One at residence on Shale and Rahn Road BUSINESS OR ACTIVITY IN THE AREA: Cliff Lake Shopping Center and townhomes to the east Rahn School and Park on the west COMMENTS: • During ball games or other events cars are parked on both sides of street from Shale to Cliff Lake Road even though the park's parking lot is not full. There are 65 parking stalls in the parking lot but it is closer or more convenient to park on the streets. This creates a safety problem when pedestrians are crossing the street at mid- block or if vehicles are entering Rahn Road from the townhouse complex. RECOMMENDATION: Post no parking on east side of Rahn Road from Shale Lane to Cliff Lake Road. • i:119bipar ing.254 • 6:2q. .<„,....7„ „..,.. \ ...:Noc.2 \ /.e4;430, A ,17., 3 Iv14 0..„. ".' //. liiliii tJG \\, . ,4:,c/3 \ . 0 , ,-- ,- , 4) ,/, ,,,,5 ,„ 10 • i '. E(L._ ..:__\ \ C' , S / 4Ft A.b (ail • , ...":34:, ..., El 1 1 Ly / t e./4Q,----, ' Ift_g■r _- 1 /* .-7 a 0 En ' ; ouet Ate .1? I �= . i 111 a .5 flrC� I RAY ANA I [ ICJIIp _t - I_ .p "�] I II - IJ I - ; _: ) .... I - - -I 1- �� "— - - - - - - 1 _ SHALE LANE — — — _ — —-— u a' I �� i�Mi ❑ l I I M Y I I I 1 1 Ilia 1 Ali Y M M I r M M I& I ' P ■ I I ,meAww 1711D Ii a . 'I w.s f � �w•... I �ll o- / / \- -,-.- I I l I i;l r Cat �4.WN 0 61 -- -�„ iI. - -- - - .1. l',iil /17 ,e,c, - .....„. - ...- ''''Vj ) ...... .... .J ... . X, . ' (/ / / ':•• III 1 ri ill; Y/ / z/ II ,iA,a� ) .R -11 ,�,+I v;�:'i1,„ / \ o 1 .F 1� `' � THE / l( MN' i 161' 1 CLIFF 1:� ',CT E► • / / i > / I ..:. ; .I 2.1AC? , \ • i 4 \ \,40)/<-.• � \,c'/.., ,,, i� �. I. I + I \ �� " 7��� � _ 1 1 _ r1lt/)/ ( I / � ∎ �._—.M.. IC PIO �i4, / / I r I, .11 1 / / r _Ir� I I" 1 ,,1 //`,,, \IsS II i .e. I . I /// \ / / / I •/// \\\ / •"-"= - - I /// ..# /// I /// F \ \ ....•.... \ < I • SCHOOL & PARK AREA PARKIN ICON .-."'a r.h,;,i, -ii ii I r I i 1 612 681 4738 09/11/4CCA Q1 7 612 6^ 4738 ` EAGAN_ Pe u3e '■ hcLk Iaj004 CAD CLOSED CALLS MOM SEP 11, 1995 11:45 AM G A `e.•G o. , of 1 '1r'f X52. ► CALL-TYPE CALL-DESCR IOTION �RECV�YNDN 1• t 'a 9444 ACCIDENT-PD CLIFF LAKE / RAHN RD `94/01/31 16 9444 ACCIDEMT•PO CLIFF LAKE / RAHN RD 94/10/07 21 SEPTEMBER 13, 1995 RE: PARKING RESTRICTIONS ON RAHN ROAD FROM SHALE LANE TO CLIFF LAKE ROAD Dear Property Owner: This notification is to inform you of the City Council consideration to impose parking restrictions on Rahn Road from Shale Lane to Cliff Lake Road. This item will be discussed on the September 20, 1995 (Wednesday) City Council meeting which will be held at the Blackhawk Middle School. If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact me at 681- 4300. Thank you. Arnie Erhart Superintendent of Streets and Equipment AE/nab cc: Mayor & City Council Tom Hedges, City Administrator Tom Colbert, Director of Public Works i:119blparking.256 art n- t -'saes: _,_6300 investigation(non-refundable) CRy of Eagan "' 6300 license fee(prorated for calendar year) 3630 Pilot Knob Rd License Term: July 1-June 30 f• Ir ` n /y Eagan,IAN 55122 G `.J 661.4600 Fax: 661.4612 • CITY OF EAGAN APPLICATION FOR MASSAGE THERAPY ESTABLISHMENT BUSINESS LICENSE 1. Name of applicant: C�Ar 11 l/ti. jc 14 t c°_ i ' DOB:L / ti/ owner, lessee or erator) Address: / 90 3 G c1� o e // lid 3 vZ� City,State,Zip :4A/ / /Yf A) S S/ 2- 2- Phone:A gl--/f/S 2. Description oqf Pj/.4-/-e isep:(i.e.,�� ding, step mall,part of existing health facility, etc.) -- I' a'r¢� / �wy 3. Location of Premises: 9 4/ s1_6 a'y M - 1 u yid address phone 4. Corporate applicants having beneficial interest: Name: g r, ;I /9 - /a} ' Address: /�7 03 S/ L vc,2 6 e // Cl Phone: t/—K5-/-1— Name: 770409- DOB cif/6s� Address: 13 7 7 fA2S it-IL G4ti� Phone: 4 $ 3— G 7 6.7 Name: Address: Phone:,, Name: Address: Phone: 5. On-Premise Manager (A/' Gr/ A/A 2d et) Residence Address:/90-3 5/4/44 ,j // Phone: , 4 r/--/-5"/<_s— 6. Have you ever been con Acted convicted If yes, give information as to the time, place and offense for which convictions were had: • • '1 ?. List the names, residences and business addresses of three people, (prefer residents of Dakota County) of good moral character, not related to the applicant or financially interested in the premises or business, who may be referred to as to the applicant's character. Name-77/4 41A-Ald Oe/ Phone 6 fnr ResidenceAddress_ /V3 7 S% ri'i e j d• 4,,4~u-MAJ Business Address ''JJ !. z � — f7 7- 9a ? v/n 7111_N It7 S y p'44- /P7107P/4, • Name C -r _ Phone qS3 - 7 6 c1 / 7 A/el kt 7` 4 c �i/r %//�//-� Residence Address � ,�r1/ �9�5/ /�- 7 /Y1 ti Business Address A/5 / /,7r/r /J d _j0/iwt/f' Name 2i da1 S A 2g g SA Phone 7? - 7/ 7 Residence Address _,5-4/.1- 3 3 V 114/1--i /1/fl it/ M A' s f /74 j Business Address , � c t �►.���� /!7/ 1-� 4/l7, 3 31-- $'So c7 In accordance with City Code Section 6.39,the City Council may require other information upon request. Date: -3 (Signatfure of Applicant) Subscribed and sworn to before me this .304- da y of A rsr A/IZ- G(" Z()GZ. P Rak . o t ublic N ... l _ 1T_ TT ✓ T .. { � • ••• ELIZABETH A.WWI I'� i RY PUBLIC-MINNESOTA • �; -al)NOTA DAKOTA COUNTY •"••' My Commission Expires Jan.31,2000 • 6.95