The URL can be used to link to this page

3905 Eagan Outlets Pkwy Use BLUE or BLACK Ink For Office Use V Eap Permit City ~ I / a I I Permit Fee: 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan MN 55122 ! ) I Date Received: (40'Z) f3 I Phone: (651) 675-5675 I I Fax: (651) 675-5694 Staff: an- 2013- COMMERCIAL PLUMBING PERMIT APPLICATION ❑ Please submit two (2) sets of plans with all commercial applications. Date: Site Address: 3 `I0~- fi-✓~fi.4N f/vtkts ~i4-at t.~.c~., Tenant: ~o►C/~ 6P~ Suite z Property Owner Name: Phone: Name: ~k3 G~ Q~,.~n ~i G nL l nC. License G '4 L4 ^ -R In Contractor Address: S City: )AjQti-•"`5 State: Zip: Phone: 19 '730U Email: _ 1L Q r I y~lr\ Ko~ l A\ . C.y''h Type of Work -New _Replacement -Repair _Rebuild - Modify Space - Work in R.O.W. Description of work: T-'Qr*%P 3L*3 COMMERCIAL New Construction Modify Space Irrigation System yes no) RPZ PVB) • Rain sensors required on irrigation systems Permit Type . Avg. GPM (2" turbo required unless smaller size allowed by Public Works) Meters Call (651) 675-5646 to verity that tests passed prior to picking up meter. Domestic: Size & Type Fire: 1 Avg. GPM High demand devices? -Yes No Flushometers Yes No COMMERCIAL FEES Contract Value $ r J X.011 $55.00 Permit Fee Minimum _ $ Permit Fee *If contract value is LESS than $10,010, Surcharge = $5.00 = $ Surcharge* **If contract value is GREATER than $10,010, Surcharge = Contract Value x $0.0005 ***If the project valuation is over $1 million, please call for Surcharge = $ TOTAL FEE Following fees apply when installing a new lawn irrigation system $ Water Permit Contact the City's Engineering Department, (651) 675-5646, for required fee amounts. $ Treatment Plant $ Water Supply & Storage $ State Surcharge TOTAL FEE CALL BEFORE YOU DIG. Call Gopher State One Call at (651) 454-0002 for protection against underground utility damage. Call 48 hours before you intend to dig to receive locates of underground utilities. www.-qopherstateonecall.org I hereby acknowledge that this information is complete and accurate; that the work will be in conformance with the ordinances and codes of the City of Eagan; that I understand this is not a permit, but only an application for a permit, and work is not to start without a permit; that the work will be in accordance with the approved plan in the case of work which requires a review and approval of plans. Y x ~1oSS x Applicant's Printed Name Applicant's Signature FOR OFFICE USE Approved By: Date: Required Inspections: -Under Ground -Rough-In -Air Test Gas Test Final PRV Required: - Yes No Page 1 of 3 Use BLUE or BLACK Ink 2013 SEWER AND WATER CONNECTION AND AVAILABILITY CHARGES EXISTING COMMERCIAL PROPERTY (if applicable) Date: FOR OFFICE USE ONLY Property Owner: - PRV required _ City R-O-W Permit Address: Phone Number: County R-O-W Permit Plumber: Contact Name: SEWER WATER Sewer Service Water Service Sewer lateral charge Water lateral charge Sewer trunk Water trunk City SAC @ $100/unit Water supply storage MCES SAC @ $2,4351unit Receipt ,,Date: Receipt Date: Treatment Plant @ $801/unit Permit Fee $60.00 Permit Fee $60.00 State Surcharge $5.00 State Surcharge $5.00 TOTAL: "Plumbing Permit Required - water meter to be acquired with building permit TOTAL: SEWER & WATER Y~ Sewer Service Water Service Sewer lateral charge Water lateral charge Sewer trunk Water trunk City SAC MCES SAC Receipt # Date Water supply & storage Receipt # Date Treatment plant Permit Fee $120.00 State Surcharge $5.00 `Plumbing Permit Required - water meter to be acquired with building permit TOTAL: Number of SAC units is determined by the Metropolitan Council Environmental Services (651) 602-1000. Sanitary Sewer Trunk Connection Charge applies if not charged sewer trunk by assessment in the past. 1-5 SAC units 1,780.00 per SAC unit ----------I I I 6-10 SAC units 8,900.00 plus 445.00 per SAC unit over 5 I For Office Use 11+ SAC units 11,130.00 plus 178.00 per SAC unit over 10 I I Permit I I I I Permit Fee: I I I I Date Received: I I L Staff: I Cc: City of Eagan Finance Department Page 2 of 3 S _Use BLUE or BLACK Ink For Office Use I Permit I City of Eap r~= C~ L I Permit Fee: ----J- I 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan MN 55122 I Date Received: Phone: (651) 675-5675 I Fax: (651) 675-5694 I Staff: 2 013 COMMERCIAL PLUMBING PERMIT APPLICATION ❑ Please submit two (2) sets of plans with all commercial applications. Date: Site Address: 39.QJr- 15a4 wit 14kS P/t-a k. way. ~ too Tenant: Suite Property Owner Name: Phone: Name: VdZi\ P( U A,, ar%c- License 6 7 Contractor Address: ).-/r .S"fn Sr S City: 4CQkly►S State: Zip: I Phone: qf-l C13t 9300 Email: to ®!/USa / ~n .Goy New -Replacement -Repair _Rebuild _ Modify Space - Work in R.O.W. Type of Work Description of work: COMMERCIAL New Construction Modify Space Irrigation System yes no) RPZ PVB) Rain sensors required on irrigation systems Permit Type . Avg. GPM (2" turbo required unless smaller size allowed by Public Works) Meters Call (651) 675- 646 to verity that tests passed prior to picking up meter. Domestic: Size & Type (IZ ' Fire: 1 Avg. GPM High demand devices? _Yes _No Flushometers _Yes _)C _No COMMERCIAL FEES Contract Value $ %oo, rj o O X.01 $55.00 Permit Fee Minimum = $ Permit Fee *If contract value is LESS than $10,010, Surcharge = $5.00 = $ Surcharge* **If contract value is GREATER than $10,010, Surcharge = Contract Value x $0.0005 ***If the project valuation is over $1 million, please call for Surcharge = $ TOTAL FEE Following fees apply when installing a new lawn irrigation system $ Water Permit Contact the City's Engineering Department, (651) 675-5646, for required fee amounts. $ Treatment Plant $ Water Supply & Storage $ State Surcharge _ $ TOTAL FEE CALL BEFORE YOU DIG. Call Gopher State One Call at (651) 454-0002 for protection against underground utility damage. Call 48 hours before you intend to dig to receive locates of underground utilities. www.gopherstateonecall.org I hereby acknowledge that this information is complete and accurate; that the work will be in conformance with the ordinances and codes of the City of Eagan; that I understand this is not a permit, but only an application for a permit, and work is not to start without a permit; that the work will be in accordance with the approved plan in the case of work which requires a review and approval of plans. x Ins V r,sS x Applicant's Printed Name Applicant's Signature FOR OFFICE USE / Approved By: 5 Date: `I Required Inspections: `Under Ground Y "Rough-In _Air Test Gas Test _j%Final PRV Required: _ Yes No Page 1 of 3 Use BLUE or BLACK Ink 2013 SEWER AND WATER CONNECTION AND AVAILABILITY CHARGES EXISTING COMMERCIAL PROPERTY (if applicable) Date: FOR OFFICE USE ONLY Property Owner: - PRV required Address: Phone Number: City R-O-W Permit ; - County R-O-W Permit Plumber: Contact Name: SEWER WATER R Sewer Service Water Service Sewer lateral charge Water lateral charge Sewer trunk Water trunk City SAC @ $100/unit Water supply storage MCES SAC @ $2,435/unit Receipt Date: Receipt Date: Treatment Plant @ $801/unit 5 Permit Fee $60.00 Permit Fee $60.00 State Surcharge $5.00 State Surcharge $5.00 TOTAL: *Plumbing Permit Required - water meter to be acquired with building permit TOTAL: SEWER &WATER_. .._v...., s..._, . Sewer Service Water Service Sewer lateral charge Water lateral charge Sewer trunk Water trunk City SAC MCES SAC Receipt # Date Water supply & storage Receipt # Date Treatment plant Permit Fee $120.00 State Surcharge $5.00 *Plumbing Permit Required - water meter to be acquired with building permit TOTAL: Number of SAC units is determined by the Metropolitan Council Environmental Services (651) 602-1000. Sanitary Sewer Trunk Connection Charge applies if not charged sewer trunk by assessment in the past. 1-5 SAC units 1,780.00 per SAC unit r 6-10 SAC units 8,900.00 plus 445.00 per SAC unit over 5 1 For Office Use I 11+ SAC units 11,130.00 plus 178.00 per SAC unit over 10 I Permit I I I Permit Fee: 1 I 1 1 I 1 Date Received: I I I 1 Staff: L------------- Cc: City of Eagan Finance Department Page 2 of 3 Use bLUk or BLACK Ink - -i ! For Office Usesi i ) l `f. Eapt Permit: ! (p I t V ,~DtP I 3830 Pilot Knob Road i Permit Fee: I Eagan M 55122 I I Phone: (651) 675-5675 I Date Received: I Fax: (651) 675-.5694 ! i ~ Staff:. ! 2 013 MECHANICAL PERMIT APPLICATION El Please submit two (2) sets of plans with all commercial applications. Date: Site Address: Tenant: _ ResldentltJvrier Name: Phone: a Address f City l Lih. r r, Name: License -,'7' l Address. - City Contractor - - State: - Phor - - - - - Contact, E i i -iai! 1 i`I w Replacement Additional i,l ,gyration Cr nnciition Type of Work Description of work: NOTE: Roof rriounted and ground mounted mechanical equipment is required to be screened by City I Code. Ploa.~e contact the Mechanical Inspector for information on permitted screening rnethods. FESIDENTIAL COMMERCIAL Furnace New Construction Interior Improvement Permit Type Air Conditioner Install Piping Processed - ~ Air Exchanger Gas Exterior HVAC Unit I Meat Pump x _ Under/Above ground Tank Install I_ Remove) Other ,M RESIDENTIAL FEES $60.00 Minimum Add or alteration to an existing unit (includes $5.00 State Surcharge) $100.00 Residential New (includes $5.00 State Surcharge) TOTAL FEE COMMERCIAL PEES Contract Value $ Z'0 X.01 $55.00 Permit Fee Minimum $70.00 Underground tank installationfre oval = $ _ T Permit Fee *If contract value is LESS than $10,010, Surcharge = $5.00 ' 14 = $ Surcharge* **If contract value is GREATER than $10,010, Surcharge = Contract Value x $0.0005 -If the project valuation is over $1 million, please call for Surcharge (off _ $ q(3 TOTAL FEE ! hereby acknowledge that this information is complete and accurate; that the work will be in conformance with the ordinances and codes of the City of Eagan; that I understand this is not a permit, but only an application for a permit, and work is not to start without a permit; that the work will be in accordance with the approved plan in the case of work which requires a review and approval of plans. x Appiicanit's Printed Name - At t.rc~tit JGJn ~ ~ ; _ FOR OFFICE USE Required Inspections: Reviewed y: c~ Y Date:~7 I f 1 Jnderground Rough In Air Test Gas Service Test In-floor Heat ~tr' Final HVAC Screening • City of Ekon 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan MN 55122 Phone: (651) 675-5675 Fax: (651) 675-5694 JUN 1 2013 Use BLUE or BLACK Ink For Office Use Permit 1 I I UV) (k41- Permit Fee: siO114-14, Date Received: 17 -Io (3 Staff: 2013 COMMERCIAL BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION Date: May 16, 2013 Site Address: 3905 Eagan Outlets Parkway (Building 100) Tenant Name: Paragon Outlets Cedar Grove (Tenant is: X New / Former Tenant: N/A Existing) Suite #: Name: Paragon Outlets Eagan LLC. Phone: 410-856-1812 Address / City/ Zip: c/o Paragon Outlet Partners LLC. , 217 East Redwood St. - 21st fir. Baltimore, MD 21202 Applicant is: X Owner Contractor Description of work: A new 116,927 s.f. (GBA) shell retail structure including site work Construction Cost; $11,437,440 — 'tear, . A-0=-- I 1 4Z7 44-0 . 0.47 Name: Ryan Companies US, Inc. License #: N/A Address: 50 South 10th Street, Suite 300 City. Minneapolis State: MN Zip: 55403-2012 Contact: Brian Kombrink Name: Phone; 612-492-4312 Email. Brian.Kombrink@RyanCompanies.com Dal Pos Architects, LLC/Taras Pawliw, AIA Address. 101 N. Clinton Stree, Suite 300 State: NY Zip: 13202 Contact Person: Dennis E. Cox, AIA Phone: Registration #: 43971 City: Syracuse 315-422-0201 EmaU cd ox@dalpos.com Licensed plumber installing new sewer/water service: "V0elt441.04"ift Xeciva. rt(.) Phone #: .9S2-98 9300 Ians at you „Obt*/11, are considerec! to be id*); information may be classified'AaPOni. you pr v pec conclude that they gre trade secrets. !nformation. Portions ef at would permit the City to CALL BEFORE YOU DIG, Call Gopher State One Call at (651) 454-0002 for protection against underground utility damage, Call 48 hours before you intend to dig to receive locates of underground utilities. wvvw.00phersteteonecalLore 1 hereby acknowledge that this information is complete and accurate; that the work will be in conformance with the ordinances and codes of the City of Eagan: that I understand this is not a permit, but only an application for a permit, and work is not to start without a permit; that the work will be in accordance with the approved plan in the case of work which requires a review and approval of plans. x 1‘),,,,,,ert={41c. Applicant's Printed Name Applicant's Signature Page 1 of 3 30105 Ear Okk41th err.kij IA/ TE DO NOT BELOW THIS LINE i I Wo SUB TYPES Foundation Public Facility Commercial / Industrial Accessory Building Apartments Greenhouse / Tent Miscellaneous Antennae WORK TYPES s/ New Addition Alteration Interior improvement Exterior Improvement Repair Replace Water Damage Salon Owner Change DESCRIPTION Valuation Plan Review (25% 100%V) Census Code # of Units # of Buildings Type of Construction 11)4Z-0, ii -tor • V .0-‘) Occupancy Code Edition Zoning Stories Square Feet Length Width REQUIRED INSPECTIONS Footings (New Building) Footings (Deck) Footings (Addition) Foundation Drain Tile V Roof: Decking `/Insulation Ice & Water jFinal /Framing Fireplace: _Rough In Air Test _Final V/ insulation Meter Size: Exterior Alteration—Apartments Exterior Alteration—Commercial Exterior Alteration—Public Facility Siding Reroof Windows Fire Repair Final C/O Inspection: Schedule Fire Marshal to be present: Reviewed By: It--frito" , Building Inspector Demolish Building* Demolish Interior Demolish Foundation Retaining Wall *Demolition of entire building — give PCA handout to applicant A4 Vo7kAsse PD 1 /i(,47-1 MCES System SAC Units getweos LIot_cce-rt City Water Booster Pump PRV Fire Sprinklers Sheetrock s/ Final / C.O. Required Final / No C.O. Required V Other: Pit 5I-kettAile Pool: Footings Air/Gas Tests Fi al V Siding: _Stucco Lath Stone Lath Brick Windows z Retaining Wall V Erosion Control V Yes No Reviewed By: Erni • , Planning COMMERCIAL FEES Base Fee Surcharge Plan Review MCES SAC City SAC S&W Permit & Surcharge Treatment Plant Treatment Plant (Irrigation) Park Dedication Trail Dedication Water Quality 4711.413. 7S". R.2-/.117 3 0. gte'l Water Quality Water Supply & Storage (WAC) Storm Sewer Trunk Sewer Trunk Water Trunk Street Lateral Street Water Lateral Other: A TOTAL iv rd --17 T. OP Page 2 of 3 Use BLUE or BLACK Ink For Office Use Q C I Permit J 1 I City of EaEdIl ~2ss Permit Fee: T I 3830 Pilot Knob Road I I Eagan MN 55122 I `13 Phone: (651) 675-5675 I Date Received: I Fax: 651 675-5694 I Staff: - 2013 FIRE SUPPRESSION SYSTEMS PERMIT APPLICATION* Date: C?S /3o j'a 13 Site Address: 3905 Ecg pn cl.~I e FS Pa r lcwo ~ , ( as n , M N 55122 Tenant: Parc. c, a, G~Jte 4- MG l\ Suite M Name: Phone: Property Owner Address / City / Zip: Applicant is: Owner Contractor Type of Work Description of work: nS air w~~ C, s~.PPr~SS: erg Sys~e 3 20-C 5 Construction Cost: 1 i 1 r 3 (G Estimated Completion Date: ~o ~ Z5 Zoe Name: Ah z r n rrr Pro ~cc4'c>r1 License 0039 Contractor Address: 13-701-5 2GF'` 1~ve mssJe_ R0 City: ~iy mom l h State: MN Zip: ~jNH ( Phone: 7 03 - 2~8 oai5 Contact: ~hG r t e NZ Ili Email: Crr1r 11 e rC o.h ern 1-r re _ C-rrl FIRE PERMIT TYPE WORK TYPE K Sprinkler System of heads Uphj X New _ Addition Fire Pump _ Standpipe Alterations _ Remodel Other: Other: DESCRIPTION OF WORK: N Commercial _ Residential _ Educational FEES Contract Value $ f ! 1, 3 Gd X.01 $55.00 Permit Fee Minimum = $ I I r3 , (pfd Permit Fee *If contract value is LESS than $10,010, Surcharge = $5.00 **If contract value is GREATER than $10,010, Surcharge = Contract Value x $0.0005 = $ ~j~j . (08 Surcharge* ***If the project valuation is over $1 million, please call for Surcharge _ 11 (49 r 2d $ TOTAL FEE 3/4" Displacement Fire Meter - $245.00 = 7;5,00 Fire Meter 19 o L4. Z$ TOTAL FEE *Requirements: 2 complete sets of drawings and specifications, cut sheets on materials and components to be used I hereby apply for a Fire Suppression System permit and acknowledge that the information is complete and accurate; that the work will be in conformance with the ordinances and codes of the City of Eagan and with the Minnesota Building/Fire Codes; that I understand this is not a permit, but only an application for a permit, and work is not to start without a permit; that the work will be in accordance with the approved plan in the case of work which requires a review and approval of plans. X C-h,,Cl,° e M 11er x r-'~ Applicant's Printed Name Applicant's Signature FOR OFFICE USE REQUIRED INSPECTIONS V~Hydrostatic Flow Alarm Drain Test Rough In Trip Pump Test Central Station _J,~~Final Conditions of Issuance: Permit Reviewed by: Date: FTG 1tiP4V,* '17rK! rZOW/T ONLr7 Use BLUE or BLACK Ink Use j I For Office i Permit ' ~ 014 0 City of Eakan a j 3830 Pilot Knob Road i Permit Fee. (D t _C)Z 9 1 Eagan MN 55122 Date Received: 1 Phone: (651) 675-5675 1 0 t5 1 Fax: (651) 675-5694 Staff: , 2013 COMMERCIAL BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION Date: May 16, 2013 Site Address: 3905 Eagan Outlets Parkway (Building 100) Tenant Name: - Paragon Outlets Cedar Grove (Tenant Is: X Newl Existing) Suite Former Tenant: N/A N„me; Paragon Outlets Eagan LLC. Phone: 410-856-1812 Property Owner Address /City/ Zip: c/o Paragon Outlet Partners LLC. , 217 East Redwood St. - 21st fir. Baltimore, MD 21202 Applicant is: X Owner Contractor Type of Work Description of work: A new 155,441 s.f. (GBA) shell retail structure including site work Construction Cost: $15,456,000 (VA441j,etj0A SA-iwb Olv to.-aoo°'b Name: Ryan Companies US, Inc. License N/A Contractor Address: 50 South 10th Street, Suite 300 City: Minneapolis St: i1 : MN Zip: 55403-2012 Phone; _ 612-492-4312 Contact: Brian Kombrink Email: Brian.KombrinkpRyanCompanies.com Marne: Dal Pos Architects, LLC/Taras Pawliw, AIA Registration : 43971 Architect/Engineer Address: 101 N. Clinton Stree, Suite 300 City:. Syracuse - - State: NY Zip: 13202 phone: 315-422-0201 Contact Person: Dennis E. Cox, AIA Email, dcoxgdalpos.com Licens_ed.pttrmberinsta~lingnfwsewerlwaterservice: Phone 1: NOTE: Plans and supporting documents that you submit are considered to be public information. Portions of the information may be classified as non-public if you provide specific reasons that would permit the City to conclude that they are trade secrets. CALL BEFORE YOU DIG. Calf Gopher State One Call at (651) 454.0002 for ptotection against underground utility damage. Cali 48 haurs before you intend to dig to receive locates of underground utilities. www,aouher~tateonecall.org I hereby acknowledge that this information is complete and accurate; that the work will be in confor ance with the ordinances and codes of the City of Eagan; that I understand this is not a permit, but only an application for per , a d work is not to start without a permit; that the work will be in accordance with the approved plan in the case o ork which s a view and approval of plans, x Steven Trainer, Paragon Project Manager I . I- If Applicant's Printed Name Appl is gnature aV_ rl (1J Ywj, t ea-e 4 Page 1 of 3 DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE SUB TYPES Y` Foundation Public Facility Exterior Alteration-Apartments _ Commercial / Industrial Accessory Building Exterior Alteration-Commercial Apartments Greenhouse / Tent Exterior Alteration-Public Facility Miscellaneous Antennae WORK TYPES New Interior Improvement Siding _ Demolish Building* Addition Exterior Improvement Reroof Demolish Interior Alteration Repair Windows Demolish Foundation Replace Water Damage Fire Repair Retaining Wall Salon Owner Change *Demolition of entire building - give PCA handout to applicant DESCRIPTION Valuation /V/ 00~ • e-a Occupancy MCES System Plan Review Code Edition Zeo7 MSAe SAC Units 4~ (25 Zoning City Water °u i 100%__!j' Census Code Stories ! Booster Pump # of Units Square Feet 137 X83 PRV r of Buildings ! Length Fire Sprinklers Type of Construction ~•,6 Width REQUIRED INSPECTIONS ✓ Footings (New Building) Sheetrock Footings (Deck) Final / G.D. Required Footings (Addition) Final / No C.D. Required Foundation Other: Drain Tile Pool. _ ...,Footings -Air/Gas Tests ,-Final Roof: ,_Decking ,Insulation -ice & Water Final Siding: Stucco Lath Stone Lath -Brick Framing Windows Fireplace -Rough in Air Test -Final Retaining Wall Insulation Erosion Control Meter Size: Final C/O Inspection: Schedule Fire. Marshal to be present: Yes No Reviewed By: crW& , Building Inspector Reviewed By: Planning COMMERCIAL. FEES Base Fee f Water Quality Surcharge ° o Water Supply & `Storage (WAC) ~r Plan Review 1 7 • Storm Sewer Trunk MCES SAG //Z1 D/D . e.a Sewer Trunk City SAC 4 Ce oo . Water Trunk S&W Permit & Surcharge / Z~• a-a' Street Lateral Treatment Plant 3G~ S1(1- s-ts Street Treatment Plant (irrigation) Water Lateral l~D/Gf'T7O~tr' /3~ ZoQ. Park Dedication Other: -/jEAM Trail Dedication Water Quality TOTAL /&7s /0° Page 2 of 3 Dale Schoeppner April 29, 2013 Chief Building Official City of Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55122-1810 Dear Mr. Schoeppner: The Metropolitan Council Environmental Services (MCES) Division has determined the SAC to be charged for the wastewater capacity demand for Paragon Outlets Build~g_, to be located at 3905 Eagan Outlets Parkway within the City of Eagan. The City will be charged no additional SAC Units for this project, as determined below. SAC Units Charges: Trench Drain 8.67 f.u. @ 17 f.u./SAC Unit 0.51 Retail (speculative) 137683 sq. ft. @ 3000 sq. ft. /SAC Unit 45.89 Total Charge: 46.40 ff, Credits: Cedar Grove Phased Development 46.00 Net Charge: 0.40 or 0 At the time the finishing permits are issued, if the use changes from its speculative use to a different use, then the SAC assignment needs to be reviewed based on that change. The business information was provided to MCES by the applicant at this time. It is the City's responsibility to substantiate the business use and size at the time of the final inspection. If there is a change in use or size, a redetermination will need to be made. If you have any questions, call me at 651-602-1118 or email karon.cappaert@metc.state.mn.us. Sincerely, Karon Cappaert SAC Program Technical Specialist Environmental Services Division KC: kg: 130429A6 Determination expiration: 04129/2015 cc: J. Nye, MCES Amy Griffin, Eagan (email) Salem LaHood, Paragon (email) A 390 Robert Street North I St. Paul, MN 55101-1805 Phone 651.602.1000 1 Fax 651.602.1550 1 TTY 651.291.0904 metrocouncil.org METROPOI. [TAN • Opportunity Employer u C i L Use BLUE or BLACK lnk 2012 SEWER AND WATER CONNECTION AND AVAILABILITY CHARGES EXISTING COMMERCIAL PROPERTY (if applicable) April 12, 2013 Date: FOR OFFICE USE ONLY Property Owner: Paragon Outlets Eagan LLC. _ PRV required - City:R-O-W Permit to-Para oYrOutlet`PartnerS L~-C 40562 ress: g Phone Number: 217 East Redwood St. - 21st fir., Baltimore, MD 21202 _ County R-O-W Permit Plumber: ST. LakVL l IU1l07' Contact Name: "Mrs SEWER Gt2 S&I. 3e6-4- WATER Sewer Service Water Service Sewer lateral charge Water lateral charge Sewer trunk Water trunk City SAC @ $1001unit Water supply storage MCES SAG @ $2,4351unit Receipt , Date: Receipt Date: Treatment Plant @ $8011unit Permit Fee $60.00 Permit Fee $60.00 State Surcharge $5.00 State Surcharge $5.00 TOTAL: *Plumbing Permit Required - wa6 r meter to be acquired with building permit TOTAL: SEWER & WATER Sewer Service Water Service Sewer lateral charge Water lateral charge Sewer trunk Water trunk City SAC MCES SAC Receipt # Date Water supply & storage Receipt # Date Treatment plant Permit Fee $120.00 State Surcharge $5.00 *Plumbing Permit Required water meter to be acquired with building permit TOTAL: Number of SAC units is determined by the Metropolitan Council Environmental Services (659) 602-9000. Sanitary Sewer Trunk Connection Charge applies if not charged sewer trunk by assessment in the past. 1-5 SAC units 1,780.00 per SAC unit x------------------ 6-10 SAG units 8,900.00 plus 445.00 per SAC unit over 5 1 Fror 0' ce usj l I 11 + SAC units 11,130.00 plus 178.00 per SAC unit over 10 Permit#: l -14l !I 1 I I Permit Fee: I I Date Received: I I I Staff: I --J 1--------------- Cc: City of Eagan Finance Department Page 2 of 3 . -f PERMIT City of Eagan Permit Type: Building 3830 Pilot Knob Rd Permit Number: EA110740 Eagan, MN 55122 , Date Issued: 05/24/2013 n (651) 675-5675 ~ of fLL~'uI www.ci.eagan.mn.us Q Site Address: 3905 Eagan Outlets Pkwy Lot: Block: Addition: PID: Use: Paragon Outlet Center - Buildi Description: Sub Type: Foundation Construction Type: II-B Work Type: New Description: Census Code: 101- Occupancy: M Zoning: PD Square Feet: 137,683 Comments: Fee Summary: BL - Base Fee $191.75 0801.4085 Valuation: 10,000.00 City SAC (01 Unit) $4,600.00 9376.4681 Plan Review $124.64 0720.4222 Sewer Permit $60.00 6201.4532 Surcharge - Based on Valuation $5.00 9001.2195 Surcharge-Fixed $5.00 9001.2195 Treatment Plant $36,846.00 6101.4685 Water Permit $60.00 6101.4507 SAC - Commercial/Industrial $112,010.00 9220.2275 Tree Mitigation $13,200.00 9001.2120 Total: $167,102.39 i Contractor: - Applicant Owner: Ryan Companies, US Paragon Outlet Partners LLC 50 S Tenth St #300 217 E Redwood St Minneapolis MN 55403 21st Floor (612) 492-4232 Baltimore MD 21202 (410) 856-1812 1I hereby acknowledge that I have read this application and state that the information is correct and agree to comply with all applicable State of Minnesota Statutes and City of Eagan Ordinances. Applicant/Permitee: Signature Issued By: Signature Use BLUE or BLACK Ink r For Office Use 1 Permit 17' City of Ea~a~ I Permit Fee: C~~ I 3830 Pilot Knob Road I I Eagan MN 55122 I I Phone: (651) 675-5675 1 Date Received: I Fax: (651) 675-5694 I I Staff: L-----------------I 2013 SEWER AND WATER CONNECTION AND AVAILABILITY CHARGES EXISTING COMMERCIAL PROPERTY Date. ~ l -l 1 FOR OFFICE USE ONLY Property Owner: PRV required Address: 9161 -5/"t e T- V Phone Number: sa~~C - City R-O-W Permit _ County R-O-W Permit Plumber 57`-/4~ Contact Name: SEWER WATER Sewer Service Water Service Sewer lateral charge Water lateral charge Sewer trunk Water trunk City SAC @ $100/unit Water supply storage MCES SAC @ $2,435/unit Receipt , Date: Receipt , Date: Treatment Plant @ $801/unit Permit Fee $60.00 Permit Fee $60.00 State Surcharge $5.00 State Surcharge $5.00 TOTAL: "Plumbing Permit Required - water meter to be acquired with building permit TOTAL: SEWER & WATER Sewer Service Water Service Sewer lateral charge Water lateral charge Sewer trunk Water trunk City SAC MCES SAC Receipt # Date Water supply & storage Receipt # Date Treatment plant Permit Fee $120.00 State Surcharge $5.00 'Plumbing Permit Required - water meter to be acquired with building permit TOTAL: Number of SAC units is determined by the Metropolitan Council Environmental Services (651) 602-1000. CALL BEFORE YOU DIG. Call Gopher State One Call at (651) 454-0002 for protection against underground utility damage. Call 48 hours before you intend to dig to receive locates of underground utilities. www.gopherstateonecall.oro Cc: City of Eagan Finance Department Use BLUE or BLACK Ink -----------------t I For Office Use , n ; Permit* City OfEa j Permit Fee: VG~ °o'D , 3$30 Pilot Knob Road I Eagan MN 55122 I I Phone: (661) 6756675 I Date Received, t I I Fax: (651) 675-5694 ~ Staff: I 2014 COMMERCIAL FIRE ALARM PERMIT APPLICATION* Date: 3 - i `t - 14 Site Address: 1 C5 E7At1L,,r d ~-cL it ?'S Ply k w At ~r Tenant: (<.A G 0-, O',rV LC^ T_ Mkt L-(- Suite M Name: Phone: Property Owner Address /City 1 Zip: Applicant is: Owner Contractor Type of Work Description of work: T., S'~A AI a I~.r I~r~ /A {+M S yr4c Construction Cost: Estimated Completion Date: Name: l 4 S4, Te J+•.o 4 j)f 6;ey,, a License A T Sat 1? Contractor Address: ~3SSS Z.~r.A S'T W City: V AG C- ~A State.. Zip: SS 3~7 Phone: QS 2 " cl b C ` S4r $ y2-- Contact: S"~c vt c l~ Email: S cJn m C 6. LC_ A,%TG . Co r % 59ew _ Remodel Work Type Addition Other Alterations DESCRIPTION OF WORK: -A-tommerciai Residential Educational FEES Contract Value $ x Al $55.00 Permit Fee Minimum = $ _ {X Permit Fee *If contract value is LESS than $10,010, Surcharge = $5.00 **If contract value is GREATER than $10,010, Surcharge = Contract Value x $0.0005 = $ Surcharge* ***If the project valuation is over $1 million, please call for Surcharge n pJ _ $ TOTAL FEE *Requirements: 2 complete sets of drawings and specifications, cut sheets on materials and components to be used I hereby apply for a Fire Alarm permit and acknowledge that the information is complete and accurate; that the work will be In conformance with the ordinances and codes of the City of Eagan and with the Minnesota Building/Fire Codes; that I understand this is not a permit, but only an application for a permit, and work is not to start without a permit; that the work will be In accordance with the approved plan in the case of work which requires a review and approval of plans. x !A-e y a Art C x Applicant's Printed Name icant's Signature FOR OFFICE USE Reviewed By: Date: Required Inspections: Rough-In Final Fire Alarm Test �lt 0� �� Il �ei�o � � �� TO: Dale Schoeppner, Building Inspections Scott Peterson, Building Inspections Craig Novaczyk or Mike Lence, Building Inspections Mike Ridley, Planning Pam Dudziak, Planning Joe Gibbs, Utility Billing Darrin Bramwell, Fire Department Russ Matthys, Engineering John Gorder, Engineering Aaron Nelson, Engineering Leon Weiland, Engineering Tim Pahr, Engineering Paul Olson, Maintenance Eric Macbeth, Maintenance Linda Dralle, Utilities Jon Eaton, Utilities Mark Anderson, Electrical Inspector FROM: Mike Lence DATE: July 23, 2014 SUBJECT: Final Inspection for: Twin Cities Premium Outlets (Paragon) Shell Buildings 3905 Eagan Outlets Pkwy— Building 100—111660 3995 Eagan Outlets Pkwy—Building 200— 111662 3965 Eagan Outlets Pkwy—Building 300— 111670 3925 Eagan Outlets Pkwy—Building 400—111672 3985 Eagan Outlets Pkwy—Building 500— 111676 3945 Eagan Outlets Pkwy—Building 600—111678 3885 Eagan Outlets Pkwy—Building 700—111790 The Protective Inspections Division will be performing a final inspection at the above referenced property on July 30, 2014. If you have cause for not granting the Certificate of Occupancy, please submit a "hold request" to my attention. The person/department requesting a hold is responsible for notifying and resolving problems with the affected parties. ' �e�o Cit of �a �� TO: J Scott Peterson, Building inspections # 22 H henstein Communit Develo ment �/Jon o , y p ✓,Mike Ridley, Planning �Darrin Bramwell, Fire Marshal Russ Matthys, Engineering John Gorder, Engineering Aaron Nelson, Engineering �eon Weiland, Engineering ,Jon Eaton, Utilities ✓`Eric Macbeth, Maintenance v`Gregg Hove, Maintenance Lt. Mike Fineran, Police FROM: Craig Novaczyk, Senior Building Inspector DATE: 5/15/2013 RE: Plan Review For: Paragon Building #100 3905 Eagan Outlets Parkway The plans are in our plan review section for your review and comment. Please return this form to my attention with your signed comments within 7 days. Please indicate any concerns you have with these plans and resolve these issues with the affected parties. If you are requesting that issuance of the building permit be held, please submit the praper"hold request"form to me. Comments: Indicate below any fees that are to be collected with the building permit. Amount ❑ Yes ❑ No Landscape Security Required Zoning: ❑ Yes � No Water Quality Dedication Meter Size: ❑ Yes ❑ No Park Dedication ❑ Yes ❑ No Trail Dedication ❑ Yes ❑ No Tree Dedication ❑ Yes ❑ No PRV Required Signature Date G:\Building Inspections\FORMS\Commercial Bldgs Final & Plan Review Letters Clt of �a a� �e�o � � TO: Scott Peterson, Building Inspections #�2'Z`� Jon Hohenstein, Community Development Mike Ridley, Planning Darrin Bramwell, Fire Marshal Russ Matthys, Engineering John Gorder, Engineering Aaron Nelson, Engineering Leon Weiland, Engineering Jon Eaton, Utilities Eric Macbeth, Maintenance Gregg Hove, Maintenance Lt. Mike Fineran, Police FROM: Craig Novaczyk, Senior Building Inspector DATE: 5/15/2013 RE: Plan Review For: Paragon Building #100 3905 Eagan Outlets Parkway The plans are in our plan review section for your review and comment. Please return this form to my attention with your signed comments within 7 days. Please indicate any concerns you have with these plans and resolve these issues with the affected parties. If you are requesting that issuance of the building permit be held, please submit the proper"hold request" form to me. Comments: Indicate below any fees that are to be collected with the building permit. Amount ❑ Yes Cy No Landscape Security Required Zoning: ❑ Yes ��_ No Water Quality Dedication Meter Size: ❑ Yes ❑ No Park Dedication ❑ Yes ❑ No Trail Dedication ❑ Yes ❑ No Tree Dedication ❑ Y No PRV Requir � � �� Signatur Date G:\Building Inspections\FORMS\Commercial Bldgs Final & Plan Review Letters Clt of �a a� �e�o � � TO: Scott Peterson, Building Inspections #,�"�� Jon Hohenstein, Community Development Mike Ridley, Planning Darrin Bramwell, Fire Marshal Russ Matthys, Engineering John Gorder, Engineering Aaron Nelson, Engineering Leon Weiland, Engineering Jon Eaton, Utilities Eric Macbeth, Maintenance Gregg Hove, Maintenance Lt. Mike Fineran, Police FROM: Craig Novaczyk, Senior Building Inspector DATE: 5/15/2013 RE: Plan Review For: Paragon Building #100 3905 Eagan Outlets Parkway The plans are in our plan review section for your review and comment. Please return this form to my attention with your signed comments within 7 days. Please indicate any concerns you have with these plans and resolve these issues with the affected parties. If you are requesting that issuance of the building permit be held, please submit the proper"hold request" form to me. Comments: ,` NQ�y � Indicate below any fees that are to be collected with the building permit. Amount ❑ Yes ❑ No Landscape Security Required Zoning: ❑ Yes ❑ No Water Quality Dedication Meter Size: ❑ Yes ❑ No Park Dedication ❑ Yes ❑ No Trail Dedication ❑ Yes ❑ No Tree Dedication ❑ Yes ❑ No PRV Required _ IS 13 Signature Date G:\Building Inspections\FORMS\Commercial Bldgs Final & Plan Review Letters �l� 0� ��. �11 �e�io � � TO: Scott Peterson, Building Inspections �� Jon Hohenstein, Community Development Mike Ridley, Planning Darrin Bramwell, Fire Marshal Russ Matthys, Engineering John Gorder, Engineering Aaron Nelson, Engineering Leon Weiland, Engineering Jon Eaton, Utilities Eric Macbeth, Maintenance Gregg Hove, Maintenance Lt. Mike Fineran, Police FROM: Craig Novaczyk, Senior Building Inspector DATE: 5/15/2013 RE: Plan Review For: Paragon Building #100 3905 Eagan Outlets Parkway The plans are in our plan review section for your review and comment. Please return this form to my attention with your signed comments within 7 days. Please indicate any concerns you have with these plans and resolve these issues with the affected parties. If you are requesting that issuance of the building permit be held, please submit the , proper"hold request"form to me. Comments: �,' l � L1—v�., �-..�i Indicate below any fees that are to be collected with the building permit. Amount -�� ❑ Yes � No Landscape Security Required = L�,- �."C��';t Zoning: ❑ Yes No Water Quality Dedication Meter Size: ❑ Yes � No Park Dedication ❑ Yes �. No Trail Dedication �rYes �. No TreeDedication � �(j r,;e.-� �,.�., L.v�v.:�-��L-�- ❑ Yes ❑ No PRV Required � ��`-� � i 3 Signature Date G:\Building Inspections\FORMS\Commercial Bldgs Final & Plan Review Letters �It of �a a� �e�o � � TO: Scott Peterson, Building Inspections #�� Jon Hohenstein, Community Development Mike Ridley, Planning Darrin Bramwell, Fire Marshal Russ Matthys, Engineering John Gorder, Engineering Aaron Nelson, Engineering Leon Weiland, Engineering Jon Eaton, Utilities Eric Macbeth, Maintenance Gregg Hove, Maintenance Lt. Mike Fineran, Police FROM: Craig Novaczyk, Senior Building Inspector DATE: 5/15/2013 RE: Plan Review For: Paragon Building #100 3905 Eagan Outlets Parkway The plans are in our plan review section for your review and comment. Please return this form to my attention with your signed comments within 7 days. Please indicate any concerns you have with these plans and resolve these issues with the affected parties. If you are requesting that issuance of the building permit be held, please submit the proper"hold request" form to me. Comments: Indicate below any fees that are to be collected with the building permit. Amount ❑ Yes ❑ No Landscape Security Required Zoning: ❑ Yes ❑ No Water Quality Dedication Meter Size: ❑ Yes ❑ No Park Dedication ❑ Yes ❑ No Trail Dedication ❑ Yes ❑ No Tree Dedication ❑ � ❑ No PRV Requir d � • �-��I-.� Signature Date G:\Building Inspections\FORMS\Commercial Bldgs Final & Plan Review Letters Clt of �� a� �e�o � � TO: Scott Peterson, Building Ir�spections #� 20 Jon Hohenstein, Community Development Mike Ridley, Pianning Darrin Bramwell, Fire Marshal Russ Matthys, Engineering John Gorder, Engineering Aaron Nelson, Engineering Leon Weiland, Engineering Jon Eaton, Utilities Eric Macbeth, Maintenance Gregg Hove, Maintenance Lt. Mike Fineran, Police FROM: Craig Novaczyk, Senior Building lnspector DATE: 5/15/2013 RE: Plan Review For: Paragon Building #100 3905 Eagan Outlets Parkway The plans are in our plan review section for your review and comment. Please return this form to my attention with your signed comments within 7 days. Please indicate any concerns you have with these plans and resolve these issues with the affected parties. If you are requesting that issuance of the building permit be held, please submit the proper"hold request" form to me. Comments: D�v �t G-t-crg o..r. a�.��-_„�s Cc..� --t� !R,�.�`�� p�,.,_-�— o�-.—, �-� �-.....c r�.�;t..i�9 �y J�V. G��- Indicate below any fees that are to be collected with the building permit. Amount ❑ Yes ❑ No Landscape Security Required Zoning: ❑ Yes ❑ No Water Quality Dedication Meter Size: ❑ Yes ❑ No Park Dedication ❑ Yes ❑ No Trail Dedication ❑ Yes ❑ No Tree Dedication ❑ Yes ❑ No PRV Required Signature Date G:\Building Inspections\FORMS\Commercial Bldgs Final & Plan Review Letters Clt of �a a� �e�o � � TO: Scott Peterson, Building Inspections #,�2°.� Jon Hohenstein, Community Development Mike Ridley, Planning Darrin Bramwell, Fire Marshal Russ Matthys, Engineering John Gorder, Engineering Aaron Nelson, Engineering Leon Weiland, Engineering Jon Eaton, Utilities Eric Macbeth, Maintenance Gregg Hove, Maintenance Lt. Mike Fineran, Police FROM: Craig Novaczyk, Senior Building Inspector DATE: 5/15/2013 RE: Plan Review For: Paragon Building #100 3905 Eagan Outlets Parkway The plans are in our plan review section for your review and comment. Please return this form to my attention with your signed comments within 7 days. Please indicate any concerns you have with these plans and resolve these issues with the affected parties. If you are requesting that issuance of the building permit be held, please submit the proper"hold request" form to me. Comments: Indicate below any fees that are to be collected with the building permit. Amount ❑ Yes ❑ No Landscape Security Required Zoning: ❑ Yes ❑ No Water Quality Dedication Meter Size: ❑ Yes ❑ No Park Dedication ❑ Yes ❑ No Trail Dedication ❑ Ye ❑ No Tree Dedication ❑ Y ❑ No PRV Required SI30� t� i a ure Date G:\Building Inspections\FORMS\Commercial Bldgs Final & Plan Review Letters . C�t of �� a� �e�o � � TO: Scott Peterson, Building Inspections # 22 Jon Hohenstein, Community Development Mike Ridley, Planning Darrin Bramwell, Fire Marshal Russ Matthys, Engineering John Gorder, Engineering Aaron Nelson, Engineering Leon Weiland, Engineering Jon Eaton, Utilities Eric Macbeth, Maintenance Gregg Hove, Maintenance Lt. Mike Fineran, Police FROM: Craig Novaczyk, Senior Building Inspector DATE: 5/15/2013 RE: Plan Review For: Paragon Building #100 3905 Eagan Outlets Parkway The plans are in our plan review section for your review and comment. Please return this form to my attention with your signed comments within 7 days. Please indicate any concerns you have with these plans and resolve these issues with the affected parties. If you are requesting that issuance of the building permit be held, please submit the proper"hold request" form to me. Comments: ,r'�� Gi'�S d`' %'YCC's r�, S' i�l��hvd u 6-1 �5 �o o ci Indicate below any fees that are to be collected with the building permit. Amount ❑ Yes ❑ No Landscape Security Required Zoning: ❑ Yes ❑ No Water Quality Dedication Meter Size: ❑ Yes ❑ No Park Dedication ❑ Yes ❑ No Trail Dedication ❑ Yes ❑ No Tree Dedication ❑ Yes ❑ No PRV Required �� -/�/�� Signature Date G:\Building Inspections\FORMS\Commercial Bldgs Final & Plan Review Letters Cit of �� a� �e�o � � TO: Scott Peterson, Building Inspections # 20,22 Jon Hohenstein, Community Development Mike Ridley, Planning Darrin Bramwell, Fire Marshal Russ Matthys, Engineering John Gorder, Engineering Leon Weiland, Engineering Jon Eaton, Utilities Eric Macbeth, Maintenance � Gregg Hove, Maintenance Lt. Mike Fineran, Police FROM: Craig Novacyzk, Senior Building Inspector Mike Lence, Senior Building Inspector DATE: March 11, 2013 RE: Plan Review For: Paragon Outlets at Cedar Grove The plans are in our plan review section for your review and comment. Please return this form to my attention with your signed comments within 7 days. Please indicate any concerns you have with these plans and resolve these issues with the affected parties. If you are requesting that issuance of the building permit be held, please submit the proper"hold request" form to me. Comments: Indicate below any fees that are to be collected with the building permit. Amount ❑ Yes ❑ No Landscape Security Required Zoning: ❑ Yes ❑ No Water Quality Dedication Meter Size: ❑ Yes ❑ No Park Dedication ❑ Yes ❑ No Trail Dedication ❑ Yes ❑ No Tree ae"aication �""� %C7 ��.�_�ra,c� �lGE' C� � �� 3�2D0.a� ❑ Yes ❑ No PRV Required 3-�r-�3 Signature Date G:\Building Inspections\FORMS\Commercial Bldgs Final & Plan Review Letters 1. Tree mitigation requirements shall be fulfilled through a combination of upsizing landscape trees on site, installing off-site trees, and cash. 2. The applicant shall fulfill tree mitigation through the following: a. The applicant shal) upsize the 105 overstory landscape trees and conifers to be installed on site (per plan sheet L-1.1, Preliminary Landscape Plan dated 9-19-2012) from 2.5" caliper to 4" caliper (single-stem deciduous trees), and from 6' height to 12' height (coniferous trees and multiple-stem deciduous trees). b. The balance of required tree mitigation shall be fu(filled by installing 22 additional Category A trees: i. on-site, or ii. offsite (either at Outlot C, new city park, or in nearby Woodhaven Park), or iii. provide a cash paymer�t.-of $_1�r200: c. Fulfill item b above through a combination of trees and cash. � ' ( R��iVEC� ��II�� MAY 1 6 ��1� � DALPOS � ARCHITECTS & INTEGRATORS May 15,2014 Mr.Dale Schoeppner Chief Building Official Building Department City of Eagan City Hall 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan,MN 55122 Re: Building 100,Tower#7 Paragon Outlets at Cedar Grove Eagan,MN Dalpos Job No.12021 Dear Dale, We have been informed by Mr.Steven Trainer of Paragon Outlets that you are asking for the section within the code that allows Tower#7 at building 100, not to be sprinklered. Per 2010 NFPA 13: Installation of Sprinkler Systems, 8.15.1.2.2, "Concealed spaces of noncombustible and limited-combustible construction with limited access and not permitting occupancy or storage of combustibles shall not require sprinkler protection". The tower is constructed with noncombustible construction(Type IIB,noncombustible)and has limited access. With the proposed addition of partitions, to create a walkway from the roof hatch to the 3' x 3' roof access, we feel that this creates the "limited access"and will not allow"occupancy or storage"within the tower as stated in the NFPA 13 requirements above. If you have any additional questions regarding the Paragon Outlets at Cedar Grove project, please do not hesitate to call me. Sincerely, :._ �� °; � , `Z* 'i . ,yn�, � �r � J mes R.Mi er,Jr.,AIA Partner Cc Mr.Steven Trainer,Paragon Outlets Mr.1eff McKee,Ryan Companies 101 N. CLINTON ST. � SUITE 300 I SYRACUSE NY 13202 , 315 $22 0201 f FAX: 315 422 0776 wvmw.dalpos.com A Structural Steei Speciai Inspection Final Report Cedar Grove Outlet Mail—Snow Melt Enclosure 3905 Eagan OutNets Parkway Eagan, Minnesota Prepared for Paragon Outlets Eagan LLC Project BL-12-04579A July 31, 2014 Braun Intertec Corporation � ' Braun Intertec Corporation Phone:952•995•2000 . iiooi Hampshire Ave S Fax: 952•995•2020 Minneapolis,MN 55438 Web: braunintertec.com July 31,2014 Project BL-12-04579A Mr. Steven Trainer Paragon Outlets Eagan LLC 217 E Redwood Street, 21st Floor Baltimore, MD 21202 Re: Structural Steel Special inspection Procedural and Final Report Cedar Grove Outlet Mall—Snow Melt Enclosure 3905 Eagan Outlets Parkway Eagan, Minnesota Dear Mr.Trainer: Please find attached to this procedural report the Structural Steel Special Inspection Final Report for the Cedar Grove Outlet Mall Snow Melt Enclosure Project and the supporting Special Inspection Daily Reports. Special Inspection and Testing Procedures The special inspection services were periodically provided by International Code Council (ICC) certified special inspectors in accordance with the requirements of the Minnesota State Building Code, Chapter 17 of the lnternational Building Code (IBC) and the project plans and specifications. The purpose of special inspections is to provide a review of the contractor's work designated by the project structural engineer as needing special inspection under the guidelines of the IBC to determine compliance with the approved construction documents. The special inspector does not have the responsibility or authority to, nor is it the intent of special inspections to have them,judge or modify the construction documents. Only the structural engineer of record can do this. As the special inspections were completed, a Special Inspection Daily Report was prepared to summarize the results of our inspections and testing. A copy of this report was provided to the contractor's site representative for their review and records. Plans and Specifications The plans and project documents available at the site were used for our inspections. Visual Examination of the Field-Made Welds Visual examination of the field welds was conducted in accordance with American Welding Society (AWS) D1.1-2010, Figure 5.4 and Table 6.1 requirements and the requirements of the project plans and specifications. Metal Deck Weld and Fastener Observations Metal deck weld observations were conducted in general accordance with AWS D1.3-2008, Section 6A requirements and the requirements of the project plans and specifications. Items reviewed included the quality,size and spacing of the welds. In addition,the location and the completeness of the side-lap fastener installation were observed and evaluated. AA/EOE Providing engineering and enuironmental sotutions since 1957 • Paragon Out�ets Eagan LLC Project BL-12-04579A July 31, 2014 Page 2 General In performing its services, Braun Intertec used that level of care and skill ordinarily exercised by reputable members of its profession currently practicing in the same locality. No warranty, express or implied, is made. Thank you for the opportunity to provide the special inspection and testing services for this project. After review of the attached Special Inspection Final Report, if you have any questions or require additional information, please call Dan Graham at 952.995.2524 or Marv Denne at 952.995.2510. Sincerely, BRAUN INTERTEC CORPORATION � ��1��' �,r��'��z- % � Daniel P. Gra am ICC Certified Special Inspector-Structural Steel and Welding �'�-- C%�'�� Christopher R. Kehl, PE Principal-Senior Engineer Attachment: Structural Steel Special Inspection Final Report c: Jeff Graham, PE;Thorson Baker&Associates, Inc. Mark Kronbeck;Alliant Engineering, Inc. James Miller; Dalpos Architects& Integrators Craig Novaczyk; City of Eagan Michael Thorson, PE;Thorson Baker&Associates, Inc. Brad McCarter, PE; Braun Intertec �� . � ' Braun Intertec Corporation Phone:952•995•2000 . iiooi Hampshire Ave S Fax: 952•995•2020 Minneapolis,MN 55438 Web: braunintertec.com Structurai Steel Special Inspection Final Report City of: Eagan Date: July 31, 2014 Attention: Mr. Steven Trainer Project: Cedar Grove Outlet Mall—Snow Melt Enclosure 3905 Eagan Outlets Parkway Eagan, Minnesota Braun Intertec Project: BL-12-04579A In accordance with the Minnesota State Building Code,Section 1704 of the International Building Code and the agreed-upon scope of services, the required special inspections and testing have been provided for the following items Structural Field Welding. The welded connections detailed in the attached Special Inspection Daily Reports were observed in general accordance with the requirements of the project plans and specifications. There are currently no outstanding or unresolved structural welding-related issues. Metal Deck Welding and Fasteners. The metal deck welding and side-lap fasteners detailed in the attached Special Inspection Daily Reports were observed in general accordance with the requirements of the project plans and specifications.There are currently no outstanding or unresolved decking- related issues. Conclusion Based upon the inspections conducted,the testing perforrned and the attached reports, it is our professional judgment that, to the best of our knowledge,the inspected work was performed and completed in accordance with the approved plans, specifications, structural-engineer-provided modifications and applicable workmanship provisions of the Minnesota State Building Code and the International Building Code. inspecting Firm: Braun Intertec Corporation � t.i� �� I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report ;��'st`.�:'�`�;`��;'-._;, was prepared by me or under my direct supervision . �=�a°` �'°��'°. and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer 6_� , ��,��R°� *. under the laws of the State of Minnesota. !`*��.-�� '. � � :°� �� //��/f �� ,�'rs:b« :�y� ` �o-� s � • � -.'� u „ �� .. t��•,°��^��'°�`�`'' � Christopher R. Kehl, PE , Principal-Senior Engineer License Number: 43459 July 31, 2014 Attachments: Special Inspection Daily Report 1 AA/EOE Providing engineering and environmental solutions since i957 � � ��"£� Issue Date: 2413t01JQ1 Rev No.: 4 ��..��` ��r`�e�� `�`.� � �t�z�� 'x��y � ��:��r3�s��xi�»� �-�� . : ., ' a��`', � �� F �� j�� F�`�� , ��.y��`��:� Special inspection Daily Report City of Eagan, MN. Page 1 of 1 Report No.: Structural Steel#1 Date of this Report: 5-13-14 Project Name: Snowmelt Enclosure Project No.: BL-12-04579A Project Address: Client: Paragon Outlets Eagan Cfient Project Na: Weather: Partly Gloudy PM Brad McCarter Temperature: 45 ° F Type of Inspection: Inspecfion Coverage: ❑ Continuous ❑ Masonry ❑ Rebar Placement ❑ Foundations ❑ Special Cases: � Periodic � Welding & Bolting ❑ Concrete ❑ Fireproofing ❑ Piles& Piers ❑ Tendon Placement ❑ Soils Did the architect or engineer authorize changes to City-approved plans? ❑ Yes (Listed Below} ❑ No Description and lacatian af work compteted: _ Visual weld observations were performed in accordance with AW5 D1.1 and D1.3 criteria an the following: 1) Bar joist fillet welds per Nucor Vulcraft details and 2/S2,8. No discrepancy noted , 2) Puddle weld and side lap fasteners detail 2/S2.8. No discrepancy noted 3) Deck support angle fillet welds d�tail 2lS2.8. Na discrepancy noted __ _ _ _. __. __. __ __ ___ _ __. __ _ _ _ _ _ List tests perFormed: . _ __ __ _ _ _ __ _ _. _ _ Visual _ __ _ __ __ __ _ _ _ __ _ _____ _ • Are there any discrepancies noted from this day's observatians? Yes ❑ No � ■ Are there any outstanding discrepancies on this project? Yes ❑ No � o If yes, see attached Summary Sheet. ■ Report given to Contractor: Yes � No ❑ To the best of our knowledge, work inspected was done in accordance with the approved plans, specifications, and applicable workmanship provisions of the cu�rent 18C, except as noted above. --' Graham Dan Signed: �� Date: 5-13-14 Print Fuli Name: Daniel P. Graham I.D. Na.: 1054095 S1&S2 � � I II ,,�i�l DALPOS � ARCHITECTS & INTEGRATORS May 28,2013 Mr.Craig Novaczyk Senior Building Inspector 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, Minnesota 55122 RE: Preliminary Plan Review Comment Response Dear Craig, In reference to your letter dated April 4,2013 we have the following responses: 1. Since there are six(6J separate buildings in this project, we will require six separate building permit applications. We will submit six individual building permit applications for the project. 2. The following building permit submitta/ requirements were not included with your preliminary proposal. We will be submitting or have submitted the items that were not included in the original submittal as we assume that two(2)sets of civil and landscape plan that had been submitted to the City of Eagan were also for your department. I guess my assumption was wrong. �a. One (1) Certificate of Survey. The Certificate of Survey was recently submitted by Alliant Engineering, Inc. ✓b. Two (2) sets of civil plans (i.e. site, grading, erosion and utilityJ. Civil plans have recently been submitted by Alliant Engineering, Inc. �� c. One (1J Soils Report. Soils report prepared by Braun Intertec, Inc. has been submitted by Alliant Engineering, Inc. �/f d. One (1J Sewage Availability Charge (SACJ determination letter, per building (6). Please contact Karon Cappaert of Metropolitan Council at (651)602-1118 with any questions re/ated to SAC determination. The Metropolitan Council has responded with the Sewage Availability Charge(SAC)documentation letter dated April 29,2013. ✓fe. One completed Specia/Structura! Testing and Inspection Program summary schedu/e, per building (6J. Special Structural Testing and Inspections Program form has been circulated and signed by appropriate parties for the six buildings and submitted to the Building Department. �f. Two(2J set of landscape p/ans.Two sets of Landscape Plans have been submitted by Alliant / Engineering, Inc. J g. Two (2)sets of comp/eted HVAC Energy Code Compliance forms, per building. Completed HVAC Energy Code Compliance forms for each building are included in this submittal to the Building Department. ✓ 3. The current footing and foundation p/ans are of conventional design. If the design is changing to some alternate engineering method, p/ease revise your p(an accordingly. Footing and foundations are to be of conventional masonry design as Geopiers and cast-in-place concrete were 101 N. CLINTON ST. � SUITE 300 � SYRACUSE NY 13202 315 422 0201 � FAX: 315 422 0776 www.dalpos.com ! " r contemplated as an alternate foundation designs but were found not to be cost effective solution and will not be used. ? 4. The Code Analysis shall designate a specific approach to meeting the allowable area requirements of the Code. The code analysis has been revised to clarify the methodology used to meet the allowable area requirements of the Code see architectural drawing A0.3. � 5. The accessible toilet compartment c/earance shall comply with Section 604.3.1 of the 2007 • Minnesota State Accessibility Code(MSBCJ, Chapter 1342. Toilet compartment clearances requiring 4'-0" in front of the accessible water closet have been indicated in detail��and 65/A4.1. ?� '� 6. Provide cut sheets for the/ocks and latches portion of the door hardware'schedule,so we can verify ' that they comply with code. Cut sheet for locks and latch sets are included in this submittal. 7. The required graspab/e handrails for stairs and ramps sha/l comply with Section 1012.5 of the 2006 IBC. Details 43 and 61 on Sheet A9.1 do not seem to have any returns to the wall, guard or walking surface. Graspable handrails for stairs or ramps have been revised and return either to the adjacent wall or to the floor. 8. The /ocations of accessib/e T.P. dispensers and sanitary product receptacles shall comply with Section 604.7 of the 2007 MSBC, Chapter 1341, Toilet paper dispensers and sanitary product receptac s comply with Section 604.7 of the 2007 Minnesota State Accessibility Code as show in details 3 nd 65/A4.1. � ? . 9. All above ceiling water heaters are limited to a maximum six(6)gallon capacity. All water heaters greater than six(6)gallons shall be floor mounted. See"Water Heater Detail P3-2". 10. Roof hatches and rooftop equipment within ten (10J feet of the roofs edge shall be protected with a comp/ying guard. All roof hatches are provided with fall protection guard rails for fall safety. See Specification Section 077200 paragraph 2.4.G. 11. If possible, we wou/d like you to install remote testing switches for all inline smoke detecrors. A remote testing switch shall be provided for all inline smoke detectors. Thank you for your help . , l�/�^ Dennis E.Cox,AIA Partner Dalpos Architects&Integrators 101 N.Clinton Street—Suite 300 Syracuse, New York 315-422-0201 x243(phone) 315-422-0201(fax) Envelope Compliance Test Results Building_100 Project Summary Information Name:Building_100 Address: 3905 Eagan Outlets Parkway City/State/Zip: Eagan,MN Climate Location: Eagan,Minnesota Standard EnvStd climate data is used for compliance Criteria Table: 6A Floor Area;(ftz): 157663 Gross WaIlArea{ft2):55010 Window Area(ft2): 12609 Window WaIJ Ratio:0.229 Gross Roof Area(ft2): 157663 Skylight Area(ft2): 0 Skylight Roof Ratio: 0.000 Door Area(ft2):0 Com liance Summa --PASSES EPF Pro osed Standard Mar in Roofs 12535 18803 6268 Skylights 0 0 0 Exterior Walis and Windows 18529 21274 2745 Below-Grade Walls 0 0 0 Floors 0 0 0 Slabs 0 0 0 Daylighting Potential 33661 35241 1579 Total 64725 75317 10592 O a ue Construction Schedule Code Descri tion Net Area/Len th U-factor HG R-Gav R-Shth C-1 Metal Framing-Metal Framing-3.5 in. (89 mm) 42401 0.055 n.a. 13.0 1OA studs at 16 in.{400 mm)o.c.-Wall,Above Gratle Rcav-13+Rshth-10 G2 Insulation Entirely Above Dsck or Mass- 157663 0.042 n.a. 0.0 23.0 Insulation Entire�y Above Deck or Mass-Roof R- 23 Total 200064 Fenestration Schedule Code Descri fion Area U-factor SHGC SG Tvis G-1 User Defined-Window-Fixed-Aluminum with Thermal 12609 0.500 0.730 0.849 0.800 Break-Clear-Tenant_Glass(User Defined) Total 12609 Area Space Category:BJdg_100 Floor Area(ftz): 157663 Gross Wall Area{ft2)i 55010 Window Area(ft2): 12609 Window Wall Ratio: 0.229 Gross Roof Area(ft2): 157663 Skylight Area(ftz):0 Skylight Roof Ratio: 0.000 Door Area(ft2):0 Surfaces Name T e Const. Cade Area Orient Notes Roof Roof G2 457663 n/a n.a. North Wall Wal! C-1 19008 North n.a. West Wall Wall G1 6382 West n.a. ASHRAE/IESNAStandard 90.1-2004 05/20/13 Envelope Compliance Test Results Building_100 East Wall Wall' C-1 7270 East n.a. South East W Wall C-1 646 Southeast n.a. all South Wall C Wall C-1 3026 South n.a. enter South_Wall,_ Wall C-1 4386 South n.a. West,_No_can oPY South_Wall,_ Wal� C-1 4148 South n.a. W est,_W ith_C anopy ' South_Wall,_E Wall G1 4262 South n.a. ast,_No_canop Y South_Wall,_E Wall C-1 3638 South n.a. ast,_W ith_Can opy West Wall wit Wall G1 1564 West n.a. h Canopy South West Wall G1 680 Southwest n.a. Wall Total 212673 O enin s Name T e Const. Code Area Orient. Notes West Glass_w Window G-1 468 West Overhang PF=0.44 ith overhang West Glass w Window G-1 1104 West n.a. ithout overhan 9 East Glass wi Window G-1 708 East n.a. thout overhan J — South_East_GI Window G-1 216 Southeast Overhang PF=0.44 ass South Glass Window G-1 1287 South Overhang PF= 1.33 Glass_with ov Window G-1 1706 South Overhang PF=0.44 erhang Glass_12_high Window G-1 528 South Overhang PF=0.33 Glass Window G-1 2079 South Overhang PF=0.35 Giass with_ov Window G-1 1463 South Overhang PF=0.44 erhang South Glass Window G-1 198 South n.a. without overha ng Glass Window G-1 1809 South Overhang PF=0.35 West_Glass_w Window G-1 828 West Overhang PF=0.35 ith_Canopy Southwest_Gla Window G-1 216 Southwest Overhang PF= 1.11 ss with 10' ov erhang Total 12609 ASHRAE/IESNA Standard 90.1-2004 05/20/13 ' ` • ' - • � • • • . :• • ', • . Project Name: Paragon Outiets Building 100 Project Address:3905 Eagan Outlets Parkway Eagan, MN Date: 3/4/2013 City: Eagen Zip: 55122 HVAC System Designer of Record:Jeffrey M.Zunt Telephone: 330-659-668$ Contact Person:Jeffrey M.Zunt Telephone: 330-659-6688 Qualification o Exception:An energy recovery ❑ (j)Piping is insulated in accordance with ventilation system is prouided in Table 6.8.3.insulation exposed to weather is ❑ The building is 2 stories o�less in height and accordance with the requirements in suitable for outdoor service.Cellular foam has a gross floor area is less than 25,000 ft2. §6.5.6. insulation is protected from water and solar Requirements o (fi�The system shall be controlled by a radiafion. manual changeover or dual setpoint o Exception:Piping is9ocated within ❑ (a}All systems serve a single HVAC zone. thermostat manufactured HVAC units. o (b)Cooling(if any)is provided by a unitary o (g)Heat pumps equipped with auxiliary o (k)Ductwork and plenums are insulated in packaged or split-system air conditioner that internal electric resistance heaters(if any} accordance with Tables 6.8.2A and 6.826 is either air-cooled or evaporatively cooled have controls to prevent supplemental heater and sealed in accordance with Tables and meets the e�ciency requirements shown operation when the heating load can be met 6.4.4.2A and 6.4.4.2B. in Table 6.8.1.List equipment in the table by the heat pump alone. below. o (I)Construction documents require air O (h)The system controls do not permit reheat systems to be balanced in accordance with ❑ (c)The system has an air economizer as or any other form of simultaneous heating industry-accepted procedures to within 10% required by Table 6.5.1,with controls as and cooling for humidity control. of design airflow rates. required in Tables 6.5.1.1.3A and 6.5.1.1.36. The economizer has either barometric or o (i)Systems are provided with a time switch ❑ (m)Where separate heating and cooling powered relief sized to prevent that(1)can start a�d stop the system under equipment serve the same temperature zone, overpressurization of the building,.Outdoor air different schedules for seven different day- thermostats are interlocked to prevent dampers for the economizer use are provided types per week;(2)is capable of retaining simultaneous heating and cooling. with blade and jamb seals, programming and time setting during a loss of power for a period of at least 10 h;(3) o (n)Exhausts are equipped with g�auity or o Exception:The cooling e�ciency meets includes an accessible manual override that motorized dampers that will automatically or exceeds the efficiency requirement in allows temporary operation of the system for shut when systems are not in use. Table 6.3.2.Document in table below. up to 2 h;(4)is capable of temperature setback down to 55°F during off hours;and � Excepfion:Design capacity is less than o (d)Heating(if any)shall be provided by a (5)is capable of temperature setup to 90°F 300 cfm. unitary packaged or split-system heat pump, during off hours. ❑ Exception:SysEem operates a fuel-fired fumace,an electric resistance heater or a baseboard system connected to a o Excepfion:Sysfem serves hotel/motel continuously. boiler.All heating equipment meets the guest rooms. O (o)Systems have optimum start controls. e�ciency requirements of the Standard.List ❑ Exception:System operates equipment in table below. continuously. o Exception:Supply air capacity is less than 10,000 cfm. ❑ (e)The outdoor air quantity is less than or ❑ Exception: System has both a coaling equal to 3,000 cfm and less than or 70°!0 of or heating capacity1ess than 15,000 the supply air quantity at minimum outdoor air Btu/h and a supplyfian motor power design conditions. greate�than 3l4'hp. E ui ment Efficienc System Mfg.& Equipment Heating Cooling Tag(s) Model Type No. Rated Rated Minimum Rated Rated Minimum Econ. Capacity Efficiency Efficiency Capacity Efficiency Efficiency Min. E�ciency y�P a ANSUASHRAE/IESNA Standard 90.1-2004 � � E m � • i •;' � � � � ` . .. • - ; Project Name:Paragon Outlets Building 100 Project Add�ess: 3905 Eagan Outlets Pa�kway Eagan,MN Date: 314/2013 HVAC System Designerof Record: Jeffrey M.Zunt Telephone: 330-659-6688 Contact Person: Jeffrey M.Zunt Telephone: 330-659-6688 Ciry: Eagen ClimateZone: 6A Zip:55122 1%Summe�DB Temp: 91 F 1%Summe�'WB Temp: 73 F 99.6%Winter Temp: -16 F Mandato Equipment Efficienc Worksheet 6.4.1.1 System Tag Equipment Type(Tables Size Category(Tables Sub-Category or Rating lJnits of Efficiency Minimum Efficiency(Tabies 6.8.1A through G) 6.8.1A through G) Condition(Tables 6.8.1A (Tables 6.8.1A 6.8.1A through G) through G) through G) Rated >_ Required 1.5 Ton Air Cond.Air Cooled <65,000 BTU Single Package SEER 13.0 >_ 12.0 2 Ton Air Cond.Air Cooled <65,000 BTU Single Package SEER 13.0 ? 12.0 3 Ton Air Cond.Air Cooled <65,000 BTU Singie Package SEER 15.0 ? 42:0 5 Ton Air Cond.Air Cooled >65,000 <135,000 Single Package SEER 15.0 > 12A 6 Ton Air Cond.Air Cooled >65,000 <135,000 Single Package EER 12.6 >_ 10.3 7.5 Ton Air Cond.Air Cooled >65;000 <135,000 Single Package EER 13.0 >_ 10.3 > Mandato Non-Standard Centrifu al Chiller Worksheet 6.4.1.1 System Tag Leaving CHW Entering CW Condenser Flow Rate Size Category Minimum Efficiency(Tabies Temperature(°F) Temperature(°F) (gpm/ton) (Tablesfi.8.1H 6.8.1H through J) through J) Rated >_ Required > > > > GeneraF Mandatory Requirements p� Piping insulation meets or exceeds the Special Mandatory Requirements requirements of fhe Standard(§6.4.4.1.3). ❑ Load calculations are provided for selection ❑ Freeze protection or snow/ice melting of all equipment and systems(§6.4.2). � Construction documents require record systems(if any)have controls to prevent o Stair vents,elevator shaft vents,gravity drawings(§6.7.2.1),manuals(§6.7.2.2), operation in warm weather(§8:4.3.7). systembalancing(§67.2.3)and system hoods,gravity vents and gravity ventilations commissioning(§6.7.2.4). ❑ Independent perimeter heating systems(if are provided with moto�ized dampers. any)comply with the control requirements of ❑ Exception:Gravity dampers are used §6.4.3.1.1 and§6.4.3.2. since the building is less than 3 stories ❑ Independent heating and cooling thermostatic or in climate zones 1-3. controls(if any)are interlocked to prevent ❑ Exception:No venfs are required as crossover of set points(§6.4.3.2). these systemsventilate unconditioned zones. h�4 0 ANSI/ASHRAE/IESNA Standard 90.1-2004 � "' E � � . ' • : � � • • . .. • - Project Name: Paragon Outlets Building 100 Contact Person:Jeffrey M.Zunt Telephone; 330-659-6688 S stems Worksheet 6.4 System Tag 1.5 Ton 2 Ton 3 Ton 5 Ton 6 Ton 7.5 Ton Supply GFM 600 800 1200 2000 2400 3000 Supply ESP(in.w.c.) q" 1" 1" 1" 1" 1" Fan System HP 1/8 1/4 1.0 1.0 1.0 3.75 OA CFM{i.e.Outdoor Air CFM) 50 60 240 400 480 600 Automatic Shutdown(§6.4.32.1) C1 C1 C1 C1 C1 C1 Deadband(§6.4.3.1.2) N2 N/A N2 N/A N2 N/A N2 N/A N2 N/A N2 N/A Setback Controls(§6.4.3.2.2) C1 C1 C1 C1 C1 C1 Setup Controls(§6.4.3.22) C1 C1 C1 C1 C1 C1 Optimum Start(§6.4.3.1.3) N3 N/A N3 N/A N3 N/A N3 N/A N3 NIA N3 N/A Zone Isolation(§6.4.3.1.4) N3 N/A N3 N!A N3 N/A N3 N/A N3 N/A N3 N/A Shutoff Dampers(§6:4.3.3:3) C2 C2 C2 C2 C2 C2 Heat Pump Aux Heat(§6.4.3.4) N1 N/A N1 N/A N1 N/A N1 N/A N1 N!A N1 N/A Humidifier Preheat(§6.4.3.5) N1 N/A N1 N/A N1 N/A N1 N/A N1 N/A N1 N/A Humidification/Dehumidification Deadband(§6.4.3.6) N1 N/A N1 N/A N1 N/A N1 N/A N1 N/A N1 N/A Ventilation Control(§6.4.3.8) N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A DucUPlenum Insulation(§6.4.4.2.1) C1 C1 C1 G1 C1 C1 Duct Sealing Levels(§6.4.4.2.1)Suppiy/Return A A A A A A Duct Leakage Test(§6.4.4.2.2) Y Y Y Y Y Y In the table above,enter the appropriate codes Setup Controls Heat Pump Aux Heat from this list: • C1 Setup provided(up to 90F) • C1 Complying controls provided Shutdown • N1 N/A continuous operation • N1 N/,4 system is not a heat pump C1 Complying nonresidential time switch ' N2 N/A s15 kbtu/h or Gi/4 hp • N2 N/A auxiliary is not electric or is not • with override � N3 N/A 1%Sum DB<=100F provided . C2 Complying residential time switch with • N4 N/A no cooling • N3 N/A heat pump covered by NAECA override Optimum Start Humidifier Preheat • N9 N/A continuous operation . C1 Optimum start provided • C1 Complying controis provided • N2 N/A s15 kbtu/h or Gi/4 hp . N1 N/A continuous operation • N1 N/A no humidifier • N3 N/A hotel/motel guestroom . N2 N/A�5 kbtu/h or Q/4 hp N3 N/A su 1 <-10,000 cfm Humidification/Dehumidification Dead Band Dead Band � pp y . C1 Complying controls provided • C1 Dual setpoint control Shutoff Dampers • N1 N/A no humidification and/or • C2 Manuai change over control . C1 Motorized shutoff dampers on OA and dehumidi�cation • N1 N/A special occupancy(requires Exh approval) • C2 Gravity shutoff dampers on OA and Exh Duct/Plenum insulation • N2 N/A heating or cooling only . N9 N/A continuous operation • C1 Complying insulation provided N2 N/A s15 kbtu/h or Ci/4 h • N1 N/A ali ducts located in conditioned Setback Controls . N3 N/A OA/EA<=300 cfm p space • C1 Setback provided(down to 55F) Duct Sealin • N1 N/A continuous operation Zone Isolation g • N2 N/A_<15 k6tu/h or Ci/4 hp � • Enter highest seal level(A,8 or C)for C1 Isolation zones provided • N3 N/A 99.6%Win DB>40F . Nl N/A continuous operation suppty and return • N4 N/,4 radiant heating . N2 N/,4 515 kbtu/h or C3/4 hp Duct Leakage Test • N5 N/A no heating . N3 N/A all zones on same schedule • Y Ducts will be fesfed for leakage • N4 N/A OA/EA<=5,000 cfm • N Ducts wili not be tested forleakage h�p 0 ANSI/ASHRAE/IESNA Standard 90.1-2004 � � E � � . � � � . _ � � , , � , p, �. , ,. Project Name: Paragon Outiets Building 100 Contact Person: Jeffrey M:Zunt Telephone: 330-659-6688 Prescriptive Checklist heat addition and loop heat rejection(if any) Prescriptive Economizers(§6.5.1) Specify economizer exemptions: comply with the requirements of§6.5.2.2.3. m Systems employ airside economizers ❑ System pumps greater than 10 hp employ (§6:5.1.1). variable flow controls(§6.5.4.1),pump � Economizer provides up to 100%design isolation(§6:5.4.2)and temperature�eset airflow in outdoor air(§6.5.1.1.1). Prescriptive AirSystem Requirements (§6.5.4.3). � Economizer is integrated with the mechanical o Simultaneous Heating and Cooling Prescriptive Special System Requirements cooling system(§6.5.1.1.2 and§6.5.1.3). (§6.52.3). O All heat rejection equipment with motors?7.5 � Economizer high limit shutoff complies with � Zone minimums were set to meet the hp employ controls that comply with§6.5.5. §6.5.1.1.3. requirements of Standard 62. o Exhaust Air Energy Recovery:all fan systems � Economizer dampers meet or exceed � Zone minimums were set to<_0.4 cfm/ftZ of that have both a design supply capacity of>_ leakage requirements(§6.5.1.1.4). zone conditioned floor area. 5,000 cfm and a minimum outdoor ait supply of>_70%of the design suppiy air employ an � System provides�elief for up to 100%design � Zone minimums are less than 300 cfm. energy recovery system that complies with airflow in outdoor air(§6.5.1.1.5). ❑ Other(requires special documentation and §6.5.6.1. m Economizer complies with the heating system approval). ❑ Heat recovery for service water heating is impact requi�ements(§6.5.1.4). O Humidity controls(if any)comply with the provided for facilities that operate o Systems emp�oy waterside economizers. requirements of§6.5.2.3. continuously,have a total water-cooled heat rejection capacity exceeding 6,000,000 btu/h, ❑ Economizer can provide 100%0 of the load at o Systems that employ hydronic cooling and and have a design service water heating load either the outdoor conditions of 50°F db/45°F have humidification(if any)use a waterside exceeding 1,000,000 btu/h.The heat wb or 45°F db/40°F wb where required for economizer that complies with§6.5.1. recovery system(if any)corriplies with dehumidification purposes(§6.5.12.1). ❑ Variable air volume fan controls comply with §6.5.62. ❑ Precooling coiis and heat exchangers have the requirements of§6.5.3.2. o Kitchen hoods with exhaust flows>5000 cfm either a<_15 ft of WC pressure drop or are comply with the requirements of§8.5.7.1. Prescriptive WaterSystem Requirements bypassed when economizer is not in use(§ o Fume hoods with a total exhaust system flow 6.5.1.2.2). ❑ Three-pipe systems are not used(§ >15,000 cfm comply with the requirements of � Economizer is integrated with the mechanical 6.5.2.2.1). §8.5.7.2. cooling system(§6.5.1.3). ' ❑ Two-pipe changeover heating/cooling ❑ Radiant heaters complying wifh§6.5.8.1 are m Economizer complies with the heating system systems(if any)comply with the used to heat unenclosed spaces(if any). impact requirements(§6.5.1.4). requirements of§6.5.2.2.2. O Hydronic(ground-or water-loop)heat pump o The cooling equipment with hot-gasbypass o Systems are exempt from the economizer systems that have equipment for both loop controis(if any)meets the unloading requirements. requirements of§6.5.9. ��P ANSI/ASHRAE/IESNA Standard 90.1-2004 � d F � �, '' � � - � - . . , , . Pro�ect Name: Paragon Outlets Building 100 Contact Person: Jefft'ey M. ZUrtt Te�ephone: 330-659-6688 Complete one worksheet for each fan system>5hp Prescriptive Fan Power Limitations 6.5.3.1 Supply Fan Retum Fan Exhaust Fan Series-Style Fan-Powered Total System ` Box Motor(hp) Tag Supply CFM Motor(hp) Tag Motor(hp) Tag Motor(hp) Tag Motor(hp) e—Total Supply CFM Total System Motor HP—3 Table 6. . . e hp/cfm Total 5upply CFM X cfm Constant + 1,000 HP Allowance = hp(=Value X CFM/1000) � Credits and/or adjustments'� Adjusted HP Aliowance* hp(see§6.5.3.1) z 'Attach calculations and documentation if credits or temperature adjustments are used.Refer to§6.5.3.1 for the formulas Credits and adjustments are available for the following: • Clean flilter pressure drops in excess of 1 in.w.c.; • Pressure drop due to heat recovery coils or devices or evaporative cooling eguipment or devices; • Relief fans that operate during peak cooling due to high ventilation rates;and • Room to cooling air supply temperature diffe�ences that are greater than 20°F(e.g.low temperafure supply). ��p 0 ANSI/ASHRAE/IESNA Standard 90.1-2004 � � E � � � ' ' • � � � • •, � i � ' � � , P�oject Name: Paragon Outlets Building 100 Project Address:3905 Eagan Outlets Pa�kway Eagan, MN Date: 3/4/2013 City: Eagen Zip: 55122 HVAC System Designer of Record:Jeffrey M.Zunt Telephone: 330-659-6688 Contact Person:Jeffrey M.Zunt Telephone: 330-659-6688 QuaIIflC8t1017 ❑ Exception:An energy recovery O (j)Piping isinsulated in accordance with ventilation system is provided in Table 6.8.3.lnsulation'<exposed to weather is o The building is 2 stories or less in height and accordance with the requirements in suitable for outdoor service.Cellular foam has a gross floor area is less than 25,000 ft2. §6.5.6. insulation is protected from water and solar Requirements o (�The system shall be controlled by a radiation. manual changeover or dual setpoint o Exception:Piping is located within ❑ (a)Ali systems serve a single HVAC zone. the�mostat. manufactured HVAC units. o (b)Cooling(if any)is provided by a unitary o (g)Heat pumps equipped with auxiliary ❑ (k)Ductwork and plenums are insulated in packaged or split-system air conditioner that intemal electric resistance heaters(if any) accordance with Tables 6.8.2A and 6.8.2B is either air-cooled or evaporatively cooled have controls to prevent supplemental heater and sealed in accordance with Tabies and meets the efficiencyrequirements shown operation when the heating load can be met 6.4.4.2A and 6.4.4.2B. in Table 6.8.1.List equipment in the table by the heat pump alone. below. o (I)Construction documents require air ❑ (h)The system controls do not permit reheat systems to be balanced in accordance with ❑ (c)The system has an air economizer as or any other form of simultaneous heating industry-accepted procedures to within 10% requiredby Table 6.5.1,with controls as and cooling for humidity control. of design airflow rates. required in Tabies 6.5.1.1.3A and 6.5.1.1.3B. The economizer has eitherbarometricor O (i)Systems are provided with a time switch ❑ (m)Where separate heatingand cooling powered relief sized to prevent that(1)can start and stop the system under equipment serve the same temperature zone, overpressurization of the building.Outdoor air different schedules for seven different day- thermostats are interlocked to prevent dampers for the economizer use are provided types per week;(2)is capable of retaining simultaneous heating and cooling. with blade and jamb seals. programming and time setting during a loss of power for a,period of at least 10 h;,(3) ❑ {n)Exhausts are equipped with gravity or ❑ Exception:The cooling efficiency rneets includes an accessible manual override that motorized dampers that will automatically or exceeds the efficiency requirement in allows tempo�ary operation of the system for shut when systems are not in use. Table 6.3.2.Document in table'below. up to 2 h;(4)is oapable of temperature p 9 p ty is less than setback down to 55°F during off hours;and � Exce tion:Desi n ca aci o (d)Heating(if any)shall be provided by a (5)is capable of temperature setup to 90°F 300 cfm. unitary packaged or split-system heat pump, during off hours. ❑ Exception:System operates a fuel-fired fumace,an electric resistance continuously. heater or a baseboard system connected to a ❑ Exception:System serves hotel/motel boiler.All heating equipment meets the guest rooms. o (o}Systems have optimum start controls. efficiency requirements of the Standard.List ❑ Exception:System operates equipment in tablebelow. O Exception:Supply air capacity is less continuously. than 10,OOd cfm. ❑ (e)The outdoor air quantity is less than or ❑ Exception: System has both a coolirtg equal to 3,000 cfm and less than or 70%of or heating capacity less than 15,000 the supply air quantity at minimum outdoor air Btu/h and a supply fan motor power design conditions. greater than 3/4 hp. Equipm,ent Efficienc System Mfg.& Equipment Heating Coo►ing Tag(s) Model Type No. Rated Rated Minimum Rated Rated Minimum Econ. Capacity E�ciency E�ciency Capacity Efficiency E�ciency Min. Efficiency ��9 0 ANSI/ASHRAE/IESNA Standard 90.1-2004 � � E � � • • i'' • . � • i ■ . . • - ` Project Name: Paragon Outlets Building 900 Project Address: 3905 Eagan Outlets Parkway Eagan,MN Date: 3/4/2013 HVAC System Designer of Record: Jeffrey M.Zunt Telephone: 330-659-6688 Contact Person: Jeffrey M.Zunt Telephone: 330-659-6688 City: Eagen Climate Zone: 6A Zip:55122 1%Summer DB Temp: 91 F 1%Summer WB Temp: 73 F 99.6%Winter Temp: -16 F Mandato Equipment Efficienc Worksheet 6.4'.1,.1 System Tag Equipment Type(Tables Size Category(Tables Sub-Category or Rating Units of Efficiency Minimum Efficiency(Tables 6.8.1A through G) 6.8.1A through G) Gondition(Tables 6.8.1A (Tabies 6.8.1A 6.8.1A through G) fhrough G) through G) Rated >_ Required 8.5 Ton Air Cond.Air Cooled >65,000 <135,000 Single Package EER 13.0 >_ 10.3 10 Ton Air Cond.Air Cooled >65,000 <135,000 Single Package EER 12.5 >_ 10.3 95 Ton Air Cond.Air Cooled >135,000 <180,000 Single Package EER 12.0 >_ 9.7 > > > > Mandato Non-Standard Centrifu al Chiller Worksheet 6.4.1.1 System Tag Leaving CHW Entering CW Condenser Flow Rate Size Category Minimum Efficiency(Tables Temperature(°F) Temperafure(°F) (gpm/ton) (Tables 6.8.1H 6.8.1H through J) through J) Rated ? Required > > > > General Mandatory Requirements � Piping insulation meets or exceeds the Special Mandatory Requirements requirements of the Standard(§6.4.4.1.3). ❑ Load calculations are provided for selection o Freeze protection or snow/ice melting of all equipment and systems(§6.4.2). m Construction documents require record systems(if any}have controls to prevent ❑ Stair vents,elevator shaft vents,gravity drawings(§6.7.2.1),manuals{§6.7 2.2), operation in warm weather(§6.4.3.7). system•balancing(§6.7.2.3)and system hoods,gravity vents and gravity ventilations o Independent perimeterheating systems(if commissioning(§6.7.2.4). are provided with motorized dampers. any)comply with the control requirements of o Exception:Graviry dampers are used §6.4.3.1.1 and§6.4.3,2. since the building is less than 3 stories o independent heating and cooling thermostatic or in climate zones 1=3. controls(if any)are interlocked to prevent o Exception:No vents are required as crossover of set points(§6.4.3.2). these systems ventilate unconditioned zones. y�P 0 ANSI/ASHRAE/IESNA Standard 90.1-2004 � � E � � . • . • � t . • ; ' ': . • - Project Name: Paragon Outlets Building t00 Contact Person:Jeffrey M.Zunt Telephone: 330-659-6688 S stems Worksheet 6.4 System Tag 8.5 Ton 10 Ton 15 Ton Supply CFM 3800 4000 6000 Supply ESP(in.w.c.) 1" 1" 1° Fan System'HP 3.75 3.75 3.0 DA CFM(i.e.Outdoor Air CFM) 760 800 1200 AutomaticShutdown{§6.4,3.2.1) C1 C1 C1 Deadband(§6.4.3.1.2) N2 N/A N2 N/A N2 N/A Setback Controls(§6:4.3.2.2) C1 C1 C1 Setup Controls(§6.4.3.2.2) C1 C1 C1 Optimum Start(§6.4:3.1.3) N3 N/A N3 N/A N3 N/A Zone Isolation(§6.4.3.1.4) N3 N/A N3 N/A N3 N/A Shutoff Dampers(§6.4.3,3.3) C2 C2 C2 Heat Pump Aux Heat(§6.4.3.4) N1 N/A N1 N/A N1 N/A Humidifier Preheat(§6.4.3.5) N1 N/A N1 N/A N1 N/A Humidification/Dehurnidification Deadband(§6.4.3.6) N1 N/A N1 N/A N1 N/A Ventilation Controi(§6.4.3.8) N/A N/A N/A DUCUPIenum Insulation(§6.4.4.2.1) C1 C1 C1 Duct Sealing Levels(§6.4.4.2.1)Supply/Retum A A A A A A Duct Leakage Test(§6.4.4.2.2) Y Y Y Y Y Y In the table above,enter the appropriate codes Setup Controls Heat Pump Aux Heat from this list: . C1 Setup provided(up to 90F) • C1 Complying controls provided Shutdown • N1 WA continuous operation . N1 N/A system is not a heat pump • Gl Complying nonresidential time switch ' N2 N/A_<15 kbtu/h or_<3/4 hp • N2 N/A auxiliary is not e%ctric or is not with override • N3 N/A 1%Sum DB<=100F provided . C2 Complying residential time switch with • N4 N/A no cooling • N3 N/,4 heat pump covered by NAECA override Optimum Start Humidifier Preheat • N1 N/A continuous operation . C1 Optimum start provided • C1 Complying controls provided • N2 N/A s15 kbtu/h or Q/4 hp . N1 N/A confinuous operation • N1 N/A no humidifier • N3 N/A hotel/motel guestroom . N2 N/A�'15 kbtu/h or C3/4 hp N3 N/A su I <-9 Humidification/Dehumidification Dead Band Dead Band • pp y - 0,000 cfm . C9 Compfying controts provided • C1 Dual setpoint confrol Shutoff Dampers • N1 N/A no humidification and/or • C2 Manual change over control . C1 Motorized shutoff dampers on OA and dehumidification • N1 N/A special occupancy(requires Exh approvai) • C2 Gravity shutoff dampers on OA and Exh DucUPlenum Insulation • N2 N/A heating or cooling only . N1 N/A continuous operation • C1 Complying insulation provided N2 N/A�15 kbtu/h or Gi/4 h • N1 N/A all ducts located in conditioned Setback Controls ' p space • C1 Setbackprovided(down to 55F) • N3 N/A OA/EA<=300 cfm ' p Zone Isolation Duct Sealin N1 N/,4 continuous o eration 9 • N2 N/A s15 kbtu/h or Gi/4 hp � • Enter highest seal level(A,8 or C)for C9 Isolation zones provided supply and return • N3 N/A 99.6%Win DB>40F . Nl N/A continuous operation • N4 N/.4 radiant heating . N2 N/A_<15 kbtu/h or_Q/4 hp Duct Leakage Test • N5 N/A no heating . N3 N/A a/!zones on same schedule • Y Ducts wil!be tested for leakage • N4 N/A OA/EA<=5,000 cfm • N Ducts wili not be tested for leakage h�4 0 ANSI/ASHRAE/IESNA Standard 90.1-2004 � °' E � � ' � . �' � ` -� � = ° - . . „ • . .. Project Name: Paragon Outlets Building 100 Contact Person: Jeffrey M.Zunt Telephone: 330-659-6688 Prescriptive Checklist heat addition and loop heat rejection(if any) Prescriptive Economizers(§6.5.1) Specify economizer exemptions: comply with the requirements of§6.5.2.2.3. m Systems employ airside economizers p System pumps greater than 10 hp employ (§6.5.1.1). variable flow controls(§6.5.4:1),pump � Economizer provides up to 100%design isolation(§6.5.42)and temperaturereset airFlow in outdoor air(§6.5.1.1.1). Prescriptive Air-System Requirements (§6.5.4.3). � Economizer is integrated with the mechanical o Simultaneous Heating and Cooling Prescriptive Special System Requirements cooling system(§6.5.1.1.2 and§6.5.1.3). (§6.5.2.3). ❑ Ali heat rejection equipment with motors?7.5 � Economizer high limit shutoff complies with � Zone minimums were set to meet the hp employ controls that comply with§6.5.5. §6.5.1.1.3. requirements of Standard 62. ❑ Exhaust Air Energy Recovery:all fan systems 6�J Economizer dampers meet or exceed ❑ Zone minimums were set to<_0.4 cfm/ft2 of that have both a design supply capacity of_> leakage requirements(§6.5.1.1.4). zone conditioned floor area. 5,000 cfm and a minimum outdoor air supply o ❑ Zone minimums are less than 300 cfm. of>70%of the design suppiy air employ an � System provides relief for up to 100/o design energy recovery system that complies with airtlow in outdoor air(§6.5.1.1.5). ❑ Other(requires special documentation and §6.5.6.1. � Economizer complies with the heating system approval). ❑ Heat recovery,for service waterheating is impact requirements(§6.5.1.4). O Humidity controls(if any)comply with the provided for facilities that operate ❑ Systems employ waterside economizers. requirements of§6.5.2.3. continuously,have a total water-cooled heat rejection capacity exceeding 6,000,000 btu/h, ❑ Economizer can provide 100%of the load at � Systems fhat employ hydronic cooling and and have a design service water heating load either the outdoor conditions of 50°F db/45°F have humidification(if any)use a waferside exceeding 1,OOQ000 btu/h.The heat wb or 45°F db/40°F wb where re uired for economizer that complies with 6.5.1. q § recovery system{if any)complies with dehumidification purposes(§6.5.1.2.1). ❑ Variable air volume fan controls compiy with §6.5.6.2. ❑ Precooling coils and heat exchangers have the requirements of§6.5.3.2. o Kitchen hoods with exhaust flows>5000 cfm either a<_15 ft of WC pressure drop or are comply with the requirements of§6.5.7.1. Prescriptive Water-System Requirements bypassed when economizer is not in use(§ ❑ Fume hoods with a total exhaust system flow 6.5.1.2.2). o Three-pipe systems are not used(§ >15,000 cfm comply with the requirements of 6.5.2.2.1). m Economizer is integrated with the mechanical §6.5.7.2., cooling system(§6.5.1.3). O Two-pipe changeover heating/cooling O Radiant heaters complying with§6.5.8.1 a�e systems(if any}comply with the m Economizer complies with the heating system used to heat`unendosed spaces(if any). impact requirements(§6.5.1.4). requirements of§6.5.2.2.2. o Hydronic(ground-or water-loop)heat pump � The cooling equipment with hot-gas bypass o Systems are exempt from the economizer systems that have equipment for both loop controls(if any)meets the unloatling requirements. requirements of§6.5:9. H p 0 ANSI/ASHRAE/IESNA Standard 90.1-2004 � �� ; � � � . � �, � � � ' ' .• Pro�ect Name: Paragon Outlets Building 100 Contact Person: Jeffrey M. Zunt Telephone: 330-659-6688 Complete one worksheet for each fan system > 5hp Prescriptive Fan Power Limitations 6.5.3.1 Supply Fan Retum Fan Exhaust Fan Series-Style Fan-Powered Total System Box Motor(hpj Tag Supply CFM Motor(hp) Tag Motor(hp) Tag Motor(hp) Tag Motor(hp) �Total Suppiy CFM Total System Motor HP� Table 6. . . hp/cfm Total Supply CFM X cfm Constant + 1,000 HP Allowance = hp(=Value X CFM/1000) 2 Credits and/or adjustments*� Adjusted HP Allowance' hp(see§6.5.3.1) 2 'Attach calculations and documentation if credits or temperature adjustments are used.Refer to§6.5.3.1 for the formulas Credits and adjustments are available for the following: • Clean filter pressure drops in excess of 1 in.w.c.; • Pressure drop due fo heat recovery coils or devices or evaporative cooling equipment or devices; • Relief fans that operate during peak coo/ing due to high ventilation rates;and • Room to cooling air supply temperature differences that are greater than 20°F(e.g,tow temperature suppiy). y�P 0 ANSI/AS:HRAElIESNA Standard 90.1-2004 � d � � BUILDING 100 � • �� .� • �� .� . : - �� , - �� . � �, - . Pro�ect Name: PARAGON OUTLETS AT CEDAR GROVE Project Address: TB� Date: 3.4.2��3 �esi9nerotRecorci: JEFFREY MITERKO Te�ephone:330.659.6688 contact Person:GREG SUTYAK Te�ePhone:330:659.6688 c�ty:EAGAN, MINNESOTA Mandatory Provisions Checklist' Automatic lighting shutoff controls are provided m Each space enclosed by ceiling-height ❑ Two-lamp tandem-wi�ed bailasts. based on either a scheduling device or an partitions has an independent,accessible occupant sensor. control that operates general lighting in the � Display lighting has a separate control. ❑ Exception: Space is intended for 24- space, ❑ Case lighting has a separate controL hour operation. ❑ Exception: The control is located in a remote location for safe or securit � Hotel/motel guest roorns have a master ❑ Exception: Space is smalier than 5,000 tY Y ft=. reasons. switch at the main entry. ❑ Exception: Space for patient care. ❑ For spaces iess than or equal to 10,000 ft2,a � Task tighting has a separate control. separate space control is provided for each ❑ Nonvisual lighting has a separate control. 2,500 ft2 of area. ❑ Exception: Space where aufomatic Z ❑ Demonstratian lighting has a separate lighting shutoff would endanger safety or � For spaces more than 10,000 ft,a separate controL space control is provided for each 10,000 ft security. of area. � Exit signs do not exceed 5 W per face. ❑ Either a photosensor or an astronomical time ❑ Exterior building grounds luminaires greater switch controls exterior lighting applications. than 1b0 W have lampswith minimum ' ❑ Excep6on: Lights must remain on for efficacy of 60 IurnensM/. safety,security or eye adaptation ❑ Exception: Luminaire is activated with a reasons. motion sensor. Interior Li htin Power Allowance Buildin Area Method, Building Lighting Power Density Building Area Lighting Power Allowance ' TYPe (W/ftz) (ft2) �W) Total Interior Li htin Power Allowance,Space-b -S ace Method- Building Common/Specific Lighting Power Density Space Area Lighting Pawer Allawance - TYPe Space Type (W(ftz) (ft2) (W) . . .. . . �� oFFICE.... . . . �1.1 . � � �� 71 ..� .. . . � �78.1�� . .. . . �. . RESTROOM 0.9 73 fi5.4 C4RRIDOR ' 0:5 1908 954.0 ' ELECT/MECH 1.5 t874 2811,0 WORKSHOP 1.9 1360 , 2584A . . . . . . .. . . . STORAGE � . . �0.8 . � � . :. 709 . . . . 567�.2 . � �. . . , Total 7059.7 y�p ANSI/ASHRAF_/IESNA Standard 90.1-2004 � ` E � �' � • : ' `� . ; � �; " ! .. �` ',• - Project►vame: PARAGON OUTLETS AT CEDAR GROVE co�tactPerso�: GREG SUTYAK Te�epho�e: 330.659:6688 Interior Connected Li htin Power TYPe ID Luminaire Description g � � � � �� Number of Watts/ Totai (including number of lamps per fixture,watts per lamp,type of � ` � � m ��a'`. Luminaires Luminaire Watts ballast,type of fixture) �..�� ' �- r='� �c. � � ay � U N �� 0 �`� N �- -�'� � ��. O �-d�xt � _ . ""��U �� 7 �i C � t � �C P?:��LL. �� J ;� O �� AA HIGH ABUSE,2-32W T8,ELECTRONIC 0'�.�� ' Q ��Q , 32 60 1920 F��, �� BB 4'INDUSTRIAL,2-32W T8,ELECTRONIC ��(� {��Q �;' Q 57 60 3420 � FF 2x4 INDIRECT,3-32W T8,ELECTRONIC Q�� Q ��; Q 2 96 192 �.�0 ��0 �' ",Q ��0 �.��0 �`��Q ��-0 �Q�O �.' Q ��0 �-..�0 `��;�-��Q 0,�0 �0�0 �': 0 � � � ��0 ��0 �� Q� � � � � � „.�. . ��0 ��"�Q �:. Q Total ', 5532 Addifional lnterior Li htin Power Allowance TYPe Space ID Space Name ��'� �'�� Area(ftz) Unit Aliowance Allowance Luminaire Installed _� � `c'fr (W(ft2) (W) ID's Power(W) �� ; rn: :y� � �= �� n s �' ��f6 � ��f: �?� O � � � �:,a�s,��! `z/�0 ��.�'s� ��0 �� 0�0 ��;� ��0 �� .�� , �„�0 �`'�-��, Q��O �� O`�O �tO� .�� , C��O �� ANSI/ASHRAEHESNA Standard 90.1-2004 �" E � � � . • � . � �; . - � � �' - „ � .. . Project Name: PARAGON OUTLETS AT CEDAR GROVE contact Perso�: GREG SUTYAK -re�ePho�e: 330.659.6688 Additional Interior Connected'Li htin Power Type' , � �"°� ,� ID Luminaire Descri tion �z �� Y Number of Watts/ Total (including number of lamps per fixture,wafts per lamp,type �� ;�,�� Luminaires Luminaire Watts of ballast,type of fixture) ��.�' �� `� c ��` rn : %'y� V �� d �^�� .��. . ;;�Rf�. O �`��.�N �'�e'� � . . ,� � �� C 'C . '�� lL �.,T{�: J .�O� . . � . � .. O�O �'�O �� O�. . . .. , 0�0 ��Q � RD .��O ��O �, O 0�0 ��0 � 10 O��O ��O O ��O �t:O � O �.��.'O ��0 ��0 ��0 ��.�0 � 0 O�O �.�--�-'`�O �E) O Total + y�p ' ANSI/ASHRAE/IESNA Standard 90.1-2004 � � � � . ~• Special Structural Testing & Inspection Program Summary Schedule Project Name Paragon Outlets Cedar Grove Project# 12021 Location 3905 Eagan Outlets Parkway, Eagan, MN Permit# (1) (Building 100) Technical (2) Description (3) Type of Specific Report Assigned Firm (6) Section Article Inspection (4) Frequency{5) 1704.3 Steel Constr. Mat'I Verification SI -S Periodic High Strength Boltin SI -S Periodic Welding SI -S Continuous 1704.4 Conc. Constr. Reinf. Steel SI -S Periodic Anchor Bolts SI -S Continuous Design Mix SI -S Periodic Strength Test SI-S Continuous Placement SI -S Continuous Curing SI -S Periodic Formwork SI -S Periodic 1704.5 Masonry Constr. Inspection SI -S Periodic Prior to Grout SI -S Periotlic Grout Placement SI -S Continuous Grout/Mortar Pris SI -S Continuous Constr. Doc./Submi al SI -S Periodic Compliance 1704.7 Soils Subgrade SI -S Periodic Excavations SI -S Periodic Controlled Fill SI -S Periodic Placement of Fill SI -S Continuous Subgrade Prep. SI -S Periodic Note:This schedule shall be filled out and included in a Special Structural Testing and Inspection Program. (If not otherwise specified, assumed program will be "Guidelines for Special Inspection & Testing" as contained in the State Building Co'de and as modified by the State adopted IBC. *A complete specification-ready program can be downloaded directly by visiting CASE/MN at www.cecm.orq. 1. Permit number to be provide by the Building Official 2. Referenced to the specific technical scope section in the program 3. Use descriptions per IBC Chapter 17, as adopted by MN State Building Code. 4. Special Inspector-Technical (SIT); Special Inspector-Structural (SIS) 5. Weekly, monthly, per test/inspection, per floor, etc. 6. Name of firm contracted to perform services Acknowledgements (Each appropriate representative shall sign below) Owner Firm Paragon Outiets Eagan LLC. Date ¢' 26 �3 Contracto �"'�� Firm Ryan Companies US, Inc. Date S'�!r—/3 Architect � Firm Dal Pos Architects, LLC. Date�� SER r Firm Thorson Baker&Associates Date '�J' �/�3 SI-S e�`�r Firm Braun Intertec, Inc. Date � I.� 3 TA Firm Braun Intertec, Inc. Date %�� l.3 F ��` � �� Firm Linco Companies Date y�� J3 . If requested by Engineer/Architect of Record or Building Official, the individual names of all prospective Special Inspectors and the work they intend to observe shall be identified as an attachment. Leqend SER=Structural Engineer of Record SI-T=Special Inspector-Technical TA=Testing Agency F = Fabricator SI-S =Speciat Inspector-Structural Accepted for the Building Division By Date BCSD-PR019 4/03 Special inspector Final Report Date: To City or County of: Attention: Street Address: City: State: Zip Code: RE: Final Project Report Project Name: Address: To Whom it May Concern: This is to certify that I performed special inspections on the following portions of the work at the above address which required continuous inspection, and which I was employed to inspect Based on my personal observation and written reports of #his work, it is my judgment that the inspected work was performed, to the best of my knowledge, in accordance with the approved plans, specifications, and the applicable workmanship provisions of the Uniform Building Code. Sincerely, Special Inspector's Signature Date Print full name ID Number cc: Client/Owner Architect/Engineer _ • �� 'g�.r �' �t �i �t*`P;� �' A '� ?* ....�_��{�, ^."'>'1- ° Y ..7 r. � ...m�..'�,es,,.�,.�.x,y u j�S �y, � ' � ,1�p .r •�� « 't . � 4 fi c� ��,� � "`� *` � -- � � . � tira� (g�:r►}:' ^:�R� ',rS. � �. �4 � / "�� . 'i� S' ��.. 4 �Z � ��y`d �:�,. .��,' �.t.+i.�. °,� •'t3ffi° �''�,; .,.� , �_r <. ,�, ,�. � �. k, , `� � � - � s . , �...,{ �' , '' .. t `.`.�� . ��. � r' �: �° '� i: ` �� ' � `��/��.i T� k �l ��.t C'' �{i `� /�• . y � � \ �� 't�� . . � d+ � + �. ��b, � 0 `� �� d ti A -V�y< ,i' - ♦� a • U� �`'`�,..�. �� '@`-r. �� 3�4 .<C € � �. �> '- � �� : �r li �� us' ( ��.a •.�: =�. ,� ' � � i t �' . 5 � , •.., �,` � S {li y#'P-.;�.� � . �'� � �M1 ' "8' /� : O . . - .� , � � G t , .;. ;:�' � 'r � • t � � w '[ ' 4 � " +` ";-` �, � ,.� � , f .�� < � �� '� ''s � �r, � �+t :; . s �� + p i�r `4 . �a l �� '�� ' � -�v� !t� �'� a�' �� , ..� Hf �,� � o ��.''�'� C,t� �� _�j'� ,�," �� ,t =�� _ �� •f§ `t. g 'x.p� '�4S i"f, t � . `� . �t N � ♦ �t�'1i �.. �s �f nt.� ♦�'..�. f t�� s�`,r,� �'� � . t� 14i I � .�F�: �.. � ♦ m L �..,� , • t .S f .�b / , ` O �` r� '.y��l�F�. p � �` i ..� '� . 1 ��.a 1 ,�-� �, r �� ('� S�b� I b 3� r J J' -0 f s L a �, ,v� , o^ v _ ��.��' � � '� �\. �. N �.'� � :,`'.'�� ' . "'�' �,s � . 'r. �� t, a� ��..+ ,. .y - . � ' � v�t a� �� . �� .0 -�,. u .�� A:r�y...J' .. . ,, . '�`e � !! � 1 •�i � � �� .. � � � �., . - � t. � '; �y}{ � r � :5�� '�y �, 't � ,�' ��." � . . �' �� _ ��X�� f ts� � �i,;``\� 3�� +. �� _ � � � r " :�� '�� .'+�, � TR, `.��,�,7� ,i`, o�'�. � - ,�n, �;a;"r�r�� d_,� �� .z -, ' .. . � . � ' � � �.� � �'_�� . �J �i�y i\,�� ;, � t 4�� t � y� - �. e � � � � r Xx X - �+� �� \iS � A . .: . �-,, �., .�. � /G 1 ��r "�' � � ` ��4�� y♦\,��i ��j �`'q� ♦:' ;�d �4 : i t � -.f t llt�AF ar`tP+. - c�r �,�i � �� / �r,1 . iP �i�''i��..��t'C ; <� '��$ �} � L. Cl 4 �1 f7. -^��fi�w��'4 ` \ ; � �{ � �' �s ��, �� ,� ro � t � ' t:��t ,,t . `�,�, f. i x {� � � / ��' /t;i'� �5t /�t. A \ 4 x �' ,c.�,�+g >�\��y �yR ��` ��°J' \� ��" � S�f � t'.r.w a w ')/ r�' `�i �. ' � a..yt�,, g 7`l' �•i�Ea' �" /� \ rt , ' # -��/ -...: ti:�rr � �L e`, �� r'�# '" �\��'' �'' 4% �' � �jr4 ; v v � :� -T Y a✓ ��' t t� �� , i-� �� }�� 1� ��` + ' �� k�' � �.. � ..„ � � Y. P i.e � � •, `. ��y�,� � \l�\ '� t. �u� �s �s �e�.�b�v,�wcfy,.`y�_.4. ,�t,1 e ,�`� s�� Zi '\� ��y� � d�. k". /=:: H C *�. „ . . , , � . . .... ,' .. 4T ` •, , � .4� . . � .� ��. � �� .. Q� _ ��t. . .- 4.' .. '`y � ' -,� , V y� J � e � � `�\,�\ �,�S�.r?�,\" y �f�'d � ��v+.�. Z V' y r t�' � • N �� N '`F', \ ��dJ�� y ��,\ �� i v' ,f�. � 'J /'��1 f� *•. � ; �1 �d 1 #r i� s �a.'� +.,s ,J1 \�� h��. . �4t� ��/�j �� '� i4��±� •-'a. l.iz 7�.(�'��k�. �� '� � `� ` ' 4� � `� \\ �, ��0'�" �?, � � y�,� .1 Irn-��a ., i� \� . ' .. � �.�'� � ,� �� •` ` r� ,� ��. i� �,.'��.. , i `, � �� :,� ��,�'� �♦, �` ``G �.�, �.�� , � °u � #},� �.�'��:`� � \`` t b :\' � �. =� ��'��`-, ; �,t i��;; ��ti ` I4. c� �.� � `. � � ' r * •` . �` ,�T `q, M ey'^~ii �� , � �� ,,�. � i .. �� 1 J�, � . `t� '� � �' + ' �,�� G) .j� �i' t� ,�„�`y�t �]�'i � �� ``� ; �t�k�,s,� C � � � � � � � �� N � � � �` '�� ` `, � ,y'� � �,,, � � � ,�; r . .�� . � �T� '� � � � ,��,,„, � ,:� '' �� *v @� '�. � ��`�s "�''' R� �' + ` 3 d' ; : ,� � '��"�� ,�t�� m y tCS , ��>. a s� *� ' � a l� � ...c�� y � i � �.. � , ��'�.� I��.7 �� '�Q"�. •Q/�� Q 4 �. � \ � t '" ,' yXJ +, (' �. � � � / C '�V 0 �'v \�� 9�� f �� '��;"'r�� ; ��. �. �� _ ` �� ' y �^ ��.: • � �.!r '!`� I%SJ��! �� , 1� � �G x f� � � . � � ��, r� _ : o \ �'`` i. , ` , �, . E , , . �i �• ' �' s.. ,� � _ �' ' - • ��w� �' >� � � -- ; _ _��'y� �� ,i.+ � , C � , �; �' � ; � �:�� f � � �` L � � ' �� v� ` $ '` a a . � . n � ��:.� � �� 4 �� N � _� � . � . - '? ��' tn w � � �� . ;� . , �� s� �� > � � � � .� �� _ �;�-., > � �,-. � �� `° ; O , � ��, � � o . � . : ., , � c ;, � �4 � � o � L � . � � �� F� � . � � � .- . " � � � ..�'��' • . Cj n. Y A Structural Steel Special Inspection Final Report Cedar Grove Outlet Mall-Building 100 3905 Eagan Outlets Parkway Eagan, Minnesota Prepared for Paragon Outlets Eagan LLC Project BL-12-04579A luly 31, 2014 Braun Intertec Corporation i � ' Braun Intertec Corporation Phone:952•995•2000 . iiooi Hampshire Ave S Fax: 952•995•2o20 Minneapolis,MN 55438 Web: braunintertec.com July 31, 2014 Project BL-12-04579A Mr. Steven Trainer Paragon Outlets Eagan LLC 217 E Redwood Street, 21st Floor Baltimore, MD 21202 Re: Structural Steel Special Inspection Procedural and Final Report Cedar Grove Outlet Mail—Building 100 3905 Eagan Outlets Parkway Eagan, Minnesota Dear Mr.Trainer: Please find attached to this procedural report the Structural Steel Special Inspection Final Report for the Cedar Grove Outlet Mall Building 100 Project and the supporting Special Inspection Daily Reports. Special Inspection and Testing Procedures The special inspection services were periodically provided by International Code Council (ICC) certified special inspectors in accordance with the requirements of the Minnesota State Building Code, Chapter 17 of the International Building Code (IBC)and the project plans and specifications. The purpose of special inspections is to provide a review of the contractor's work designated by the project structural engineer as needing special inspection under the guidelines of the IBC to determine compliance with the approved construction documents. The special inspector does not have the responsibility or authority to, nor is it the intent of special inspections to have them,judge or modify the construction documents. Only the structural engineer of record can do this. As the special inspections were completed,a Special Inspection Daily Report was prepared to summarize the results of our inspections and testing. A copy of this report was provided to the contractor's site representative for their review and records. As part of this report, items needing correction or discrepancies observed from the approved construction documents were noted. We also summarized the discrepancies documented in a Discrepancy Log. As needed, we also contacted the project structural engineer for additional clarification on specific issues related to the drawings or discrepancies observed. P�ars a�d Spe�ificati��s The plans and project documents available at the site were used for our inspections. From time to time, we received plan modifications from the structural engineer. When received,these were used to evaluate the work completed in the field. Visual Examination of the Field-Made Welds Visual examination of the field welds was conducted in accordance with American Welding Society (AWS) D1.1-2010, Figure 5.4 and Table 6.1 requirements and the requirements of the project plans and specifications. AA/EOE Prouiding engineering and enuironmental solutions sittce 1957 � Paragon Outlets Eagan LLC Project BL-12-04579A July 31, 2014 Page 2 Tension-Control Bolted Connection Observations Tension-control bolted connection observations were conducted to determine if the bolt holes were filled, if the correct bolts were used, if the nuts were fully engaged and if the splined end of the tension- control bolts had separated from the body of the bolt. Removal of the splined end is a direct indicator the bolt has been torqued to the minimum snap-off load. At connections where the splined ends were not, or could not be removed, the torque applied to the bolt by the contractor was determined using a hand-held torque wrench. In addition, each connection was observed for fit-up and to determine if the various plies were in contact with one another. Hex-Head Bolted Connection Observations Hex-head bolting observations were performed to determine if the bolt holes were filled, if the correct bolts were used, if the nuts were fully engaged and if they appeared to be snug tight. Each hex-head bolted connection was observed for fit-up and to determine if the various plies were in contact with one another. Random bolts were also selected at various connections to determine if the nuts were snug tight. This was done using a wrench and cheater bar. I Metal Deck Weld and Fastener Observations Metal deck weld observations were conducted in general accordance with AWS D1.3-2008, Section 6.0 requirements and the requirements of the project plans and specifications. Items reviewed included the quality, size and spacing of the welds. In addition,the location and the completeness of the side-lap fastener installation were observed and evaluated. Column Anchor Bolt Observations The column anchor bolts were observed to determine if they were in place, and if the nuts were installed,fully engaged and snug tight. The base plates were observed to determine if they were in full contact with the adjoining surface. If required by the construction documents,we also observed if the plate washers were installed. � Cold Form Metal-Framing Mechanical Fasteners Visual observations were conducted to determine if the mechanical fasteners used in the cold form metal-framing construction were placed in conformance with the requirements of the structural details, plans and specifications. �� Paragon Outlets Eagan LLC Project BL-12-04579A July 31, 2014 Page 3 General In performing its services, Braun Intertec used that level of care and skill ordinarily exercised by reputable members of its profession currently practicing in the same locality. No warranty, express or implied, is made. Thank you for the opportunity to provide the special inspection and testing services for this project. After review of the attached Special Inspection Final Report, if you have any questions or require additional information, please call Dan Graham at 952.995.2524 or Marv Denne at 952.995.2510. Sincerely, BRAUN INTERTEC CORPORATION �."'�"�"��,��/��`�� ,��'�__--�' Daniel P. Graham ICC Certified Special Inspector-Structural Steel and Welding i // / � Christopher R. Kehl, PE Principal-Senior Engineer Attachment: Structural Steel Special Inspection Final Report c: Jeff Graham, PE;Thorson Baker&Associates, Inc. Mark Kronbeck;Alliant Engineering, Inc. James Miller; Dalpos Architects& Integrators Craig Novaczyk; City of Eagan Michael Thorson, PE;Thorson Baker&Associates, Inc. Brad McCarter, PE; Braun Intertec �� , � ' Braun Intertec Corporation Phone:952�995•2000 . iiooi Hampshire Ave S Fax: 952•995•2020 Minneapolis,MN 55438 Web: braunintertec.com Structural Steel Special Inspection Final Report City of: Eagan Date: luly 31, 2014 Attention: Mr.Steven Trainer Project: Cedar Grove Outlet Mall 3905 Eagan Outlets Parkway Eagan, Minnesota Braun Intertec Project: BL-12-04579A In accordance with the Minnesota State Building Code, Section 1704 of the International Building Code and the agreed-upon scope of services,the required special inspections and testing have been provided for the following items: Bolting. The bolted connections detailed in the attached Special Irispection Daily Reports were observed in general accordance with the requirements of the plans and specifications.There are currently no outstanding or unresolved bolted connection-related issues. Structural Field Welding. The welded connections detailed in the attached Special Inspection Daily Reports were observed in general accordance with the requirements of the project plans and specifications. Discrepancies were noted and documented. These connections were found to be acceptable following the required corrections or review with the structural engineer. There are � currently no outstanding or unresolved structural welding-related issues. Metal Deck Welding and Fasteners. The metal deck welding and side-lap fasteners detailed in the attached Special Inspection Daily Reports were observed in general accordance with the requirements of the project plans and specifications.There are currently no outstanding or unresolved decking- related issues. Mechanical Fasteners. The mechanical fasteners detailed in the attached Special Inspection Daily Reports were observed in general accordance with the requirements of the plans and specifications. There are currently no outstanding or unresolved mechanical fastener-related issues. AA/EOE Providing engineering and enuironmental sotutions since i957 t Paragon Outlets Eagan LLC Project BL-12-04579A July 31, 2014 Page 2 Conclusion Based upon the inspections conducted, the testing performed and the attached reports, it is our professional judgment that, to the best of our knowledge,the inspected work was performed and completed in accordance with the approved plans, specifications, structural-engineer-provided modifications and applicable workmanship provisions of the Minnesota State Buifding Code and the International Building Code. tnspecting Firm: Braun Intertec Corporation I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. ��4t.61ir�alPd/�Ng��,, %/%� . T��-� Ct� �c.�t�/� rd,•,�� / o� ,E t��.� � � �4�� , n�s eb°e� `d � h �i° � 'E,;, �.4 i.1��0:9G Christopher R. Kehl, PE �`� ��F tt��m_,G'�. •�w , �r Principal-Senior Engineer !`":: )� gry °/��p. �� ...�•i� <��.�4�e'a Q 4A�� . License Number: 43459 ��'�� ;�,�.��° , o. July 31, 2014 P,,`��^��-r�°��,�,"�';�a"' � ..r�€i::.r��=� Attachments: Special Inspection Daily Reports 1 through 14 Summary of Discrepancy Log ��`�� ,� ,; -�_ tssue Date: 2013101l01 Rev No.: 0 . �� _ � � Speciai Inspection Daily Report City of Eagan, MN. Page 1 of 1 Report Na.: Structural Steel#1 Date of this Report: 7-26-13 Project Name: Building 100 Project No.: BL-12-04579A Project Address 3905 Eagan Outlets Parkway Client: r'aragon Outlets Eagan Client Project No.: Weather: Sunny PM Brad McCarter` Temperature: 70 ° F Type of Inspection: Inspection Coverage: ❑ Continuous ❑ Masonry ❑ Rebar Placement ❑ Foundations ❑ Special Cases: � Periodic � Welding 8�Bolting ❑ Concrete ❑ Fireproofing ❑ Piles 8�Piers ❑Tendon Placement ❑ Soils Did the architect or engineer authorize changes to City-approved plans? ❑Yes (Listed Below) ❑ No Description and location of wark completed: __ __ __ _ . __ _. _ _ __ _ _. _ _ _ _ _ Visual weld observations were performed in accordance with AWS D1.1 Section 6 2010 criteria on the following: 1) Bar joist fiHet welds Roof Level Grid A-D 2.05-5.98 per Nucor Vulcraft details. No discrepancy noted 2) Anchor bolts at Foundation Level Grid A-D 1.8-5.98 plies in direct contact with full nut engagement present. 3} Tube steel/X-brace ang{e fillet welds at Tower framing Grid GD 1.8-2.05. No discrepancy noted 4) Need ver�cation from the SER on Sheet S5.1 moment plates at columns for bar joist and truss girders(detail states typical, not specified on shop drawings)if they are required and what Grid locations. Work in progress 5} Need verification from the SER on 5heet S0.1 Structural Steel note#7 slip critical bolts (currently mating surfaces are painte�{primed)if requir�� and whdt Grid Ic�cations Items#4 and#5 requiring verification from the SER were reviewed on site with Mr. Dan Harlander with Ryan. _ _ __ _ __ __ _ _ __ List tests performed: __ _ _ __ __ _ _ . _ _ _ __. __ _ _ Visual _ _ _ _._ _ __ ___ _ ___ _ _ _ ■ Are there any discrepancies noted from this day's observations? Yes ❑ No � - Are there any outstanding discrepancies on fhis project? Yss ❑ No � � If yes, s�e attached Summary Sheet. • Repo!�given to Contractor: Yes � No ❑ T�tf�e upst�f our knowledge, work inspected was done in accordance wi�h the appraved plans, spec�cations, and ��Plic��i�v��,r�:rx:��hi��rct✓asic��s;;t�e curre�:�#�C, excep�wv �o�� a:;�°✓v. Signed: �ate: 7-26-13 -,°�� :e�� :�; ��,i�t �'. G��a;r l.�. �l�.; 1�J�^�'S S1uS2 e E��i i Sff3 i • � ��'f��'.�?�. i . tR �: ' � Issue Date: 2013/01/01 Rev No.: U �� _ � Special Inspection Daily Report City of Eagan, MN. Page 1 of 1 Report Na: Structural Steei#2 Date of this Report: 8-01-13 Project Name: Building 100 Project No.: BL-12-04579A Project Address: 3905 Eagan Outlets Parkway Ciient: Paragon Outiets Eagan Ciient Project No.: Weather: Sunny PM Brad McCarter Temperature: 70 ° F Type of Inspection: Inspection Coverage: ❑ Continuous ❑ Masonry ❑ Rebar Placement ❑ Foundations ❑ Special Cases: � Periodic �Welding 8�Bolting ❑ Concrete ❑ Fireproofing ❑ Piles 8� Piers ❑ Tendon Placement ❑ Soils Did the architect or engineer authorize changes to City-approved plans? �Yes (Listed Below) ❑ No Description and location of work completed: _. __ _ __ _ . _ . __ __ _ _ _ __ __ _ . . _ Visual weld observations were performed in accordance with AWS D1.1 Section 6 2010 criteria on the following: 1) Bar joist fillet welds Roof Level Grid B-D 5.98-12 per Nucor Vulcraft details. No discrepancy noted 2) Rnchar bolts at Foundation Level Grid B-D 5.98-12 plies in direct contact with fuli nu#engagement present. 3) Tube steel/X-brace angle fillet welds at Tower framing Grid A-B 5.6-5.98 and D 4-5.6. No discrepancy noted 4) Item#4 and#5 on Report 7-26-13 Sheet S5.1 moment plates at columns for bar joist and truss girders and Sheet S0.1 Structural Steet note#7 slip critical balts addressed in RFI#91. 5) A325 3/4"Tension controi batts at Roof Level Grid A-D 1.8-5.98 (various randam locations spiines end stil!intact, bolts hand iightened with wrench and bar). No discrepaney noted 6) Light gauge framing PAF and tek fasteners at Grid C-D 2.05 and A 2.05-5 per Excel drawings. No discrepancy noted List tests performed: _ _ ___ _ _ ___ _. - _ _ _ _ ._ _ __ _. __ __ __ . . _ __ _ __ _ _ _ _ _._ _ _ - _ Visual ___ ___ _ _ _ __ ._ . _ . . __ _ _ . _ ■ Are there any discrepancies noted from this day's observations? Yes ❑ No � • Are there any outstanding discrepancies on this project? Yes ❑ No � o If yes,see attaehed S�mmary Sheet. , • Report given to Contractor: Yes � Na ❑ �', To the best of our knowledge,work inspected was done in accordance with the approved plans, specifications, and appiicable workmanship provisions of the current IBC, except as noted above. Signed: Date: 8-01-13 Print Fult Name: Daniel P. Graham LD. No.: 1054Q95 S1&S2 E�1�� R�T��a�z€�€a�d��aal� Pa�e 1 c�f� � �6� �k�Q7�AY7$� E " ' � � + I �` � � � �?tkptaons �' �Faffwrard � S�aas�g � ,�; ?�ttaeh � � �' i � � `�' � � `'1 � ,_} i �enerai �Vorfcflov�r �c#ivit��csq �ttacFasraents(&} .'<.� , .; �.�Z; Linec� �te!c�ing f�uestior� ��?3�) �Answer S�bmi'tf�d M�in j Drawencrs � Pre�.ertie�` — --- — — --- � �GENERA� —,_�_._ _ _ _ _ FYIa �ur�e�st�ate Mswe€�S�lsmitted For y�uc ie�forsnatian S�€Fejeet Lin�Welding Questian sent syr �ek V�Prinsen Nt�mbet' D134 Toc F��ioaity RtC1RP�A�: lVarma6 . _. ..__._ _ _ , •Ryan S Harstad - f�QUESiI4kv � __ .. _ __ . Due: _.,— -_ - _ ___,. _ [�ANS�AFER 2Q-Aug-2013 � __._ �he rnretd is to be sized!�y Vute�a��r the mc�e�tent sh�tre syc� Mess�$ea t6t�ir sha�c#Pa�ntongs< At^��c� �_. ._ _ .__� Reasc�n for�rtsvser C6ar€fEcafaan Ru�Dat� 2EB-Aug-2CSI3 finswer S�ttt t�ate 2E3-Aug-2[I13 Cane�ay Main�ant�E S�suece CoMact�c�s�sc�€� 5aker$r A��rcda�es ��ff Gr�ham .�,rt�rv�r Source €)rigice�!e,oesfiract Dasz�me�t� Sote�Gontraet CI Cf}ST IM€'ACT� _i_ ._ . _ — ---— — . � _ __ �_ _�.. . _. _ : _ . � : = _ _ _ . :- - . , _ 0 S��-IEt�IJC.E IP6P,R��1' �AFtEAS _ . _ - � - - -- - •- - - _ C��ATCfsQRI�S . .. - . �DISCIPLItSfE s . _ . _ _ � - - _. _ _ - - - ,. _. _ _ r „,� . � _�..�, . .�,. , ,, .�. _ .._.,:_ , � ... .> �..,. . _ __-- _. ..��., _,_. _. ., ,..��.., __.., . ht�a.lApmpro.x�ancamgani�s.ccarn,�pz�ii�nee/vvebuifaf�cel'r�RFIi7��sc�ssivn��zal.asgx`?pre.. �I/��I� � i I I i I �E:ff�{lf��ff� fS adec�uat�. if nQt, ', suPPl�required �tr�1t�. I i � �� E i�a � �3K �� QTA� TE� ��lGLES. � � c€�. �4,fi r�a�s �'I� A�v��'S i��t��'�t ��`� �: ��' S�Q�'S-5" GA, Tf�P CF-64R�5. �tXiA� �.E�.�D T�2�4i�S�E�S T�93�Q��-f A��LE �x� J� � 3" �� t ( E ! � i 1 ( 1 F 1 f � � g �� N�EL� �I�EF� �SL� f�E�? �� LQ��S AR� 3N PLA�E ��f� �� ya CQLl�t��4 —��.€" F�€. F'U�.�. �'GX Graham, Dan From: Jack Prinsen [Jack.Prinsen@RyanCompanies.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 31, 2013 8:10 AM To: Graham, Dan Subject: RF191 with answer and inspection report Attachments: �91.pdf Attached is the answer for RFI 91. =� � .�� t�.� ( � � , -.. `� v..�,� 3 �_�� _. � � � "i5 � __. � jack.prinsenC�?ryancornpani�s.�orr� � 1 � �i�� 9�. — S�ru�t�ral �t�� u�s�i��a� fro� In�pector Qu�sti�n 1. Need ver►fication from tt�e SER o� Sheet 55,1 moment plate�a#�olumns for bar joist and truss girc3ers�detail states typicai, �ot specifie�!vn shop drawing�)if they are required and what Grid locat�ons.Work in progre$�. Z. f�e�d ver�fii+cation fr+�m th�S�R on Sheet S�D.1 strucutrai steel note#7 s�ip cirkical bolts (currentty mating surfa�es�re paintedJprir�ed}if rec�uired and v+rh�t Grid iocatians, �uestions�are from Dan Gr�ham, Braun Intert�ec�tructural Inspectar AiiSW@!": 1, Mamerrt p1�t�s are specified t�rt t�e sha� drawings. Refer#v de#ai�she�ts-1�?5 induded w�h �ach building submissi�n. 2.51ip critical k►o(ts wa�ald e�nly c�c��r at crvs�bracirtg if a bo�t�d�t�nr�ectic�€� is used. -.� � - �� issue Date: 2013l01t01 Rev No.: 0 � � `�"�� '. . �"f��:�€��., �, �� ,�.. �' � �� z Special Inspection Dai1y Report City of Eagan, MN. Page 1 of 1 Report No.: Structural Steei#3 Date of this Report: 8-06-13 Project Name: Building 100 Project No.: BL-12-04579A Project Address: 3905 Eagan Outlets Parkway Client: Paragon Outlets Eagan Client Project No.: _ Weather: Sunny PM Brad McCarter Temperature: 70 ° F Type of inspection: lnspeetion Coverage: ❑ Continuous ❑ Masonry ❑ Rebar Piacement ❑ Foundations ❑ Specia! Cases: � Periodic �Welding &Balting ❑ Concrete ❑ Fireproofing ❑ Piles& Piers ❑Tendon Placement ❑ Soils Did the architect or engineer authorize changes to City-approved plans? ❑Yes (Listed Below) ❑ No Description and location of work completed: _ _ _ __ ___ Visual weld obsenrations were performed in accordance with AWS D1.1 Section 6 2010 criteria on the following: 1) Bar joist fillet welds Roof Level Grid B-D 12-18 per Nucor Vulcraft details. No discrepancy noted 2) Anchor bolts at Foundation Level Grid B-D 12-18 plies in direct contact with fuEl nut engagement present. 3) Light gauge#raming PAF and tek fasteners at Grid B 5.98-12 per Excel drawings. No discrepancy noted List tests performed: . _ _ _ . _ _ __ _ _ __ _ _ Visual . _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _.. _ _ ___ ■ Are there any discrepancies noted from this day's observations? Yes ❑ No � • Are there any outstanding discrepancies on this project? Yes ❑ No � ', o !f yes,see attached Summary Sheet. • Report given to Contractor: Yes � No ❑ To the best of our knowiedge,work inspected was done in accordance with the approved plans, spec�cations, and applicable warkmanship provisions of the current IBC, except as noted above. Signed: �fi\�� Date: 8-06-13 Print Fulf Name: Daniel P. Graham LD. No.: 1054095 S1&S2 < .� � Issue Date: 2013/01/01 Rev No.: 0 ' �' .�:' � � ��` gy, � ,�� , ;, . Special Inspection Daily Report City of Eagan, MN. Page 1 of 1 Report No.: Structural Steel#4 Date of this Report: 8-08-13 Project Name: Building 100 Project No.: BL-12-04579A Project Address: 3905 Eagan Outlets Parkway �lien4: Paragon Outlets Eagan Ciient Project No.: Weather: Sunny PM Brad McCarter Temperature: 70 ° F Type of lnspection: Inspection Coverage: ❑ Continuous ❑ Masanry ❑ Rebar Placement ❑ Foundations ❑ Speciai Cases: � Periodic �Welding &Bolting ❑ Concrete ❑ Fireproofing ❑ Piles 8�Piers ❑Tendon Placement ❑ Soils Did the architect or engineer authorize changes to City-approved plans? ❑Yes (Listed Below) ❑ No Description and location af work completed: _ __ . . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ Visual weld observations were performed in accordance with AWS D4.1 Section 6 2010 criteria on the following: 1) Truss girder fillet welds at Roof Level Grid A-D 1.8-5.98 and B-D 5.98-18 per Nucor Vulcraft details. No discrepancy noted 2) Tube steel to plate fitlet welds Grid D 5-18 detail 23/S5.2. No discrepancy noted 3) Puddle welds and side lap fasteners at Roof Level Grid A-D 1.8-7 per S2.6 note. No discrepancy noted 4) Deck support angle/splice plate fillet welds Grid A-D 1-7 per sheet S5.1 and S5.2 notes. No discrepancy noted _ _ __ _ _ List tests performed: _ . _ __ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ __ _ Visual _ _._ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ . _ _ ___. __ __ ■ Are there any discrepancies noted from this day's observations? Yes ❑ No � • Are there any outstanding discrepancies on this project? Yes ❑ No � o If yes, see attached Summary Sheet. - Report given ta Contractor. Yes � No ❑ To the best of aur knowledge, work inspected was done in accordance with the approved plans, specifiications, and app{icable workmanship provisions of the current IBC, except as noted above. e Signed: ��'°�' Date: 8-08-13 Print Fuii Name: Danie! P. Graham I.D. No.: 1054095 S1&S2 7; � �� issue Date: 2013l09101 Rev No.: 0 �. �. , � . �� .y�;� i .(y .a,��.,��- . .�� . � Special Inspection Daily Report City of Eagan, MN. Page 1 of 1 Report No.: Structurai Steel#5 Date of this Report: 8-12-13 Project Name: Building 100 Project No.: BL-12-04579A Project Address: 3905 Eagan Outlets Parkway Client: Paragon Outlets Eagan Ciient Project No.: Weather: Sunny PM Brad McCarter Temperature: 70 ° F Type of tnspection: Inspection Coverage: : � Continuous ❑ Masonry ❑ Rebar Placement ❑ Foundations ❑ Special Cases: ❑ Periodic �Welding 8�Bolting ❑ Concrete ❑ Fireproofing ❑ Piles&Piers ❑Tendon Placement ❑ Soils Did the architect or engineer authorize changes to City-approved plans? ❑Yes (Lis#ed Below) ❑ No Description and location of work completed: _ ___ _. _ _._ _ _ _ . _ . _ _. _ Visual weld observations were performed in accordance with AWS D1.1 Section 6 2010 criteria on the fotiowing: 1) Bar}oist fiillet welds at Roof Level Grid C-D 18-28 per Nucor Vulcraft details. No discrepancy noted 2) Tower tube steellx-brace angle filiet welds Grid B-B.5 10-12. No discrepancy noted 3} Puddle welds and side lap fasteners at Roof Level Grid B-D 7-16 per S2.6 note. No discrepancy noted 4) Deck support angle/splice plate fillet welds Grid B-D 7-16 per sheet S5.1 and S5.2 notes. No discrepancy noted 5) Tube steel to tube steel partial penetration splices at Tower 10 columns (qty.4)fitup, root pass and cover passes observed. Need verification from the SER inspection criteria. Work in progress. _ ___ _ _ _ __ _ ._ __ _ _ _ _ __ List tests performed: ____. __ _ _ _ _ __ . _ _ __ _. _ __ _ ___ ____ __ __ Visual __ _ __ __ ___ _ _ -- _ _ _. ___._..._ ___ _ . _ __. ■ Are there any discrepancies noted from this day's observations? Yes ❑ No � ■ Are there any outstanding discrepancies on this project? Yes ❑ No � o If yes, see attached Summary Sheet. • Report given to Contractor: Yes � No ❑ To the best of our knowledge,work inspected was done in accordance with the approved plans, specifications, and applicable warkmanship provisions of the current IBC, except as noted above. �igned: Date: 8-12-13 Print Full Name: Daniel P. Graham I.D. No.: 1054095 S1&S2 Y-.�..€ � ;fl . _ } ; fssue Qate: 2013/01f01 Rev No.: 0 ' � �� :�,��„ :, .a ��`aw n , �. � Special Inspection Daiiy Report City of Eagan, MN. Page 1 of 1 Report No.: Structurai Steel#6 Date af this Report: 8-15-13 Project Name: Building 100 Project No.: BL-12-Q4579A Project Address: 3905 Eagan Outlets Parkway Ciient: Paragon Outiets Eagan Ctient Project No.: Weather: Sunny PM Brad McCarter Temperature: 70 ° F Type of Inspection: Inspection Coverage: ❑ Continuous ❑ Masonry ❑ Rebar Placement ❑ Foundations ❑ Special Cases: � Periodic �Welding & Bolting ❑ Concrete ❑ Fireproofing ❑ Piles &Piers ❑Tendon Placement ❑ Soils Did the architect or engineer authorize changes to City-approved plans? ❑Yes (Listed Below) ❑ No Description and location of work completed: _ _ _. _ ____ - _ _ _ _ Visual weld observations were performed in accordance with AWS D1.1 Section 6 2010 criteria on the following: 1) Bar joist fillet welds at Roof Level Grid C-D 28-30 per Nucar Vulcraft details. No discrepancy noted 2) Puddle welds and side lap fasteners at Roof Level Grid A-B 7-16 and A-D 16-18 per S2.6 note. No discrepancy noted 3) Deck support angle/splice plate fillet welds Grid A-B 7-16 and A-D 16-18 per sheet S5.1 and S5.2 notes. No discrepancy noted 4)Truss girder fil(et welds a#Roof Level Grid GD 18-30 per Nucor Vulcraft details. No discrepancy noted 5) Tube steel to tube steel partial penetration splices at Tower 10 columns(qty.4)fituq root pass and cover passes obser�eci. Per RFI#127 visua! irspection only requireci. Weld ments found acceptabte _ . _ _ _ _ __ __ __ List tests performed: ____ _ _ _ ._ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _.. _ _ _ __ ___ _ Visual --._ __ __ ___ __ ___ _. _ • Are there any discrepancies noted from this day's observations? Yes ❑ No � ■ Are there anyoutstanding discrepancies on this project? Yes ❑ No � o If yes, see attached Summary Sheet. ■ Report given to Contractor: Yes � No ❑ To the best of our knowiedge, work inspected was done in accordance with the approved plans, specifications, and appiicable workmanship provisians of the current IBC, except as noted above. �..._--� Signed: Date: 8-15-13 Print Full Name: Daniel P. Graham I.D. No.: 1054095 S18�S2 -��"-.�� .� �" Issne Date: 2013101t01 Rev No.; 0 �}�� ,�}�, I �T� � ��R4�� : ° �, , _ _ � Special Inspection Daily Report �i _ � I City af Eagan, MN. Page 1 of 1 Report No.: Structural Steel#7 Date of this Report: 8-19-13 Project Name: Buiiding 100 Project No.: BL-12-04579A Project Address: 3905 Eagan Outlets Parkway Client: Paragon Outlets Eagan Ciient Project No.: Weather: Partfy Cloudy PM Brad McCarter Temperature: 70 ° F Type of inspection: inspection Coverage: ❑ Continuous ❑ Masonry ❑ Rebar Placement ❑ Foundations ❑ Special Cases: � Periodic �Wetding 8�Balting ❑ Concrete ❑ Fireproofing ❑ Piles&Piers ❑ Tendan Placement ❑ Soils Did the architect or engineer authorize changes to City-appraved plans? ❑Yes (Listed Befow) ❑ No Description and location of work completed: _ _ _ _ _ Visual weld observations were performed in accordance with AWS D1.1 Section 6 2010 criteria on the folfowing: 1} Bar joist fillet welds at Roof Level Grid B-C 18-30 and B-D 30-35 per Nucor Vulcraft details. No discrepancy noted 2) Truss girder fillet welds at Roof Level Grid B-C 18-30 and B-D 30-35 per Nucor Vulcraft details. No discrepancy noted 3) Anchor bolts at Foundation Leve{ Grid A-D 18-30 plies in direct contact with full nut engagement present. _ _ _ _ _ ___ _ __ List tests performed: _ _._ . _ _ Visual _ . _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ ___._ - Are there any discrepancies noted from this day's observations? Yes ❑ No � ■ Are there any outstanding discrepancies on this project? Yes ❑ No � o If yes, see attached Summary Sheet. - Report given to Corrtractor: Yes � No ❑ To the best of our knowledgs, work inspected was done in accordance with the approved plans, specifications, and appficab(e worC�manship provisions of the current IBC, except as noted above. �--._ Signed: Date: 8-19-13 Print Full Name: Daniel P. Graham I.D. No.: 1054Q95 S18�S2 ��xw .� ��'' lssue Date: 2413l01l04 Rev No.: 0 4 4 ..� .�.,�� „ . �. €= � ..-..�`,w'�zv'�e;�3, ,� . _'$ £ �.,�.,'��' ` _ . . . ;F ',4 � �� a� Special Inspection Daily Report City of Eagan, MN. Page 1 of 1 Report No.: Structural Steel#S Date of this ReporE: 8-23-13 Project Name: Building 100 Project No.: BL-12-04579A Project Address: 3905 Eagan Outlets Parkway Client: Paragon Outiets Eagan Ctient Project No.: Weather: Partly Cloudy PM Brad McCarter Temperature: 90 ° F � Type of lnspection: inspection Coverage: ❑ Continuous ❑ Masonry ❑ Rebar Placement ❑ Foundations ❑ Special Cases: � Periodic � Welding 8�Boiting ❑ Concrete ❑ Fireprooflng ❑ Piles�Piers ❑Tendon Placement ❑ Soils Did the architect or engineer authorize changes to City-approved plans? ❑Yes (Listed Below) ❑ No Deseription_and location of work completed: __ _ __ _ _ __ _ _ _ ._ _ _ _ __ __ _ _ _ _ _ �sual weld observations were performed in accordance with AWS D1.1 Section 6 2010 criteria on the following: 1) Bar joist fil{et welds at Roof Level Grid B-D 35-41 per Nucor Vulcraft detai(s. No discrepancy noted 2) Truss girder fillet welds at Roof Level Grid B-D 35-41 per Nucor Vulcraft details. No discrepancy noted 3) Anchor bolts at Foundation Level Grid A-D 35-41 plies in direct contact with full nut engagement present. 4) Tower framing (elevation T10)x-brace angle/tube steel fillet welds. No discrepancy noted 5) Ligh gauge framing PAF and tek fasteners Grid B 12-17 per Exce(drawings. No discrepancy noted I _ _ _._ _._ _ .__ List tests performed: ---___ _ _ _____ _ _ _ _ _ Visual _._ _ - __ _ __ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ ■ Are there any discrepancies noted from this day's observations? Yes ❑ No � • Are there any outstanding discrepancies on this project? Yes ❑ No � o If yes, see attached Summary Sheet. ■ Report given to Contraetor: Yes � No ❑ To the best of our knowledge,work inspected was done in accordance with the approved plans, spee�cations, and applicable workmanship provisions of the current EBC, except as noted above. � Signed: Date: 8-23-13 Print Fuli Name: Danie{ P. Graham I.D. No.: 1Q54095 S1&S2 � Issue Date: 2U13l01t01 Rev No.: 0 � t . *"' � g . . ., : e Specia! Inspection Daify Report City of Eagan, MN. Pa9e 1 of 1 Report Na.: Structuraf Steel#9 Date of this Report: 8-28-13 Project Name: Building 100 Project No.: BL-12-Q4579A Project Address: 3905 Eagan Out{ets Parkway Ciient: Paragon Outlets Ear�an Ctient Praject No.: Weather: Partly Cloudy PM Brad McCarter Temperature: 90 ° F Type of Inspection: Inspection Coverage: ❑ Continuous ❑ Masonry ❑ Rebar Placement � Foundations ❑ Special Cases: � Periodic �Welding 8�Bolting ❑ Concrete ❑ Fireproofing ❑ Piles& Piers ❑Tendon Placement ❑ Soils Did the architect or engineer authorize changes to City-approved plans? ❑ Yes {Listed Below) ❑ No Description and locatiun of work comp{eted: _ _ _ _ . __ __ _ _ _ _ _ __ . _ Visual weld observations were performed in accordance with AWS D1.1 Section 6 2010 criteria on the following: 1) Ligh gauge framing PAF and tek fasteners Grid B 17-22 and D 28-30 per Exce{ drawings. No discrepancy noted 2) Puddle welds and side lap fasteners at Roof Level Grid A-D 18-27 per S2.6 note. No discrepancy noted 3) Tower steel/x-brace angle filfet welds at Tower Support Framing Grid A-B 17-40. No discrepancy noted 4) Deck support angle/splice bar fillet welds at Roof Levei Grid A-D 18-27 per sheet 55.1 and S5_2 nates. No dsscrepancy noted 5) Lower g;rt tube sieel to plate filiet we(ds at Grid D 32-38 detail 16/S5.2. No discrepancy noted _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ List tests pertflrmed: _ _ _ _._ _ _ _ . _ __ _ __ _._ _ Visuai _ _ ___ _ __ __ _ __ _ _. ___ _ __ _ ._ ■ Are there any discrepancies noted from this day's observat�ons? Yes ❑ No � = Ar�there any outstanding dis�r�pan�ies on this project? Yes ❑ No � � If yes, see attached Summary Sheet. ■ Report qiven to Contractor: Yes � No ❑ To the best of our knowledge,work inspected was done in accordance with the approved plans,speeificafions, and appficable workmanship provisiorts of the cur�ent IBC, exeept as noted a6ove. � 3igned: � . Da#e: 8-28-13 R��t F��I �Easne: Danief P, Graham l.Q. Na.: 1054095 S1�S2 . �.�.# ''. �`, � issue Date: 2093l01f01 Rev No.: 0 + yj s i:$ � � �_ �� Special Inspection Daily Report City of Eagan, MN. Page 1 of 1 Report No.: Structural Steel#10 Date of this Report: 9-03-13 Project Name: Building 1 QO Project No.: BL-12-04579A Project Address: 3905 Eagan Outlets Parkway Client: Paragon Outiets Eagan Client Project No.: Weather: Sunny PM Brad McCarter Temperature: 72 ° F Type of Inspection: Inspeetion Coverage: ❑ Continuous ❑ Masonry ❑ Rebar Placement ❑ Foundations ❑ Special Cases: � Periodic �Welding 8�Bolting ❑ Concrete ❑ Fireproofing �] Piles&Piers ❑Tendon Placement ❑ Soils Did the architect or engineer authorize changes to City-approved plans? ❑ Yes (Listed Below) ❑ No Description and location of work completed: _ __ _ _ _. ._ _ _ _ Visual weld observations were perFormed in accordance with AWS D1.1 Section 6 2010 criteria on the following: 1)Puddle welds and side lap fasteners at Roof Level Grid A-D 27-35 per S2.6 note. No discrepancy noted 2} Deck support angle/splice bar fillet welds at Roof Level Grid A-D 27-35 per sheet S5.1 and S5_2 notes. No diserepancy noted 3) Moment piate to bar joist fillet wefds Roof Level Grid A-D 1-41 per S5.1 notes. No discrepancy noted 4) Drag strut angle from truss girder to beam F2oof Level Grid A-D 1-41 per Section S4 detail. No discrepancy noted _ __ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ __ . List tests perFormed: _ __ _ ___ ___ _ ._ _ ._ _ _ _ _ _ _ �lisual __ _ _ __ _ _. __ _ _____._ ____ __ __ _. ___.. _ • Are there any discrepancies noted from this day's observations? Yes ❑ No � ■ Are there any outstanding discrepancies on this project? Yes ❑ No � o If yes, see attached Summary Sheet. • Report given to Contractor: Yes � No ❑ To the best of our knowledge, work inspected was done in accordance with the approved plans, specifications, and applicable workmanship provisions of the current IBC, except as noted above. � .�--'' Signed: �� Date: 9-03-13 Print Full Name: Daniet P. Graham I.D. No.: 1054095 S1&S2 � .._� % °� Issue Date: 2013/01/01 Rev No.: 0 . � _„��s�,��'�.�� •� c ,�, �g � Speciai Inspection Daily Report City of Eagan, MN. Page 1 of 1 Report No.: Structural 5teel#11 Date of this Report: 10-18-13 Project Name: Building 100 Project No.: BL-12-04579A Project Address: 3905 Eagan Outlets Parkway Ciient: Paragon Outlets Eagan Ciient Project No.: Weather: Sunny PM Brad McCarter Temperature: 50 ° F Type of Inspection: inspection Coverage: ❑ Continuous ❑ Masonry ❑ Rebar Placement ❑ Foundations ❑ Special Cases: � Periodic � Welding 8� Bolting ❑ Concrete ❑ Fireproofing ❑ Piles&Piers ❑ Tendon Placement ❑ Soils I � Did the architect or engineer authorize changes to City-approved plans? ❑Yes (Listed Below) ❑ No I Description and location of work compfeted: _. _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _. _ _ _ _ __ _ _ Visua!weld observations were performed in accordanee with AWS D1.1 Section 6 2010 criteria on the folbwing: 1) Puddle welds and side!ap fasteners at Roof Level Grid A-D 35-41 per S2.6 note. No discrepancy nated 2) Deck support angle/splice bar fillet welds at Roof Level Grid A-D 35-41 per sheet S5.1 and S5.2 notes. No ,iiscrepancy nated 3) Bar joisUtruss girder bottom chord to column stabilizer fillet welds Roof.Level Grid A-D 1-41 per Nucor Vulcraft details and S5.1 notes. No discrepancy noted 4) Uplift angle from bar joist to truss girder fillet welds at Roof Level Grid A-D 1-41 per Nucor Vufcraft details and S5.1 notes. No discrepancy noted 5) A325 3!4"and 1"tension control bolts at Roof Level Grid A-D 18-41. No discrepancy noted List tests performed: _ ___ _ _. Visual _ . • Are there any discrepancies noted from this days observations? Yes ❑ No � ■ Are there any outstanding discrepancies on this project? Yes ❑ No � � If yes, see attached Summary Sheet. • Report given to Contractor: Yes � No ❑ To the best of our knowiedge, work inspected was done in accordance with the approved plans, specificatians, and applicable workmanship provisions of the current IBC, except as noted above. ,;igned: �`�""°°— Date: 10-18-13 Print Full Name: Daniel P. Graham l.D. No.: 1054095 S1&52 ��_ ,� ��_ffi � ,� , �� ,� �� lssue Date: 2013/U1i81 Rsv No.: 0 � � _ � � � . � � , ,�, �• ,�, �,�s��' �. —•� «.�'��s=��.� -�" . s �.9 .... � +_.. . -��- � a=�' Special inspection Qaily Report City of Eagan, MN. Page 1 of 'L Report Na.: Structural Steel#12 Date of this Report: 12-17-13 Project Name: Building 100 Project No.: BL-12-04579A Project Address: 3905 Eagan Outlets Parkway Client: Paragon Outlets Eagan Client Project No.: Weather: Indoors PM Brad McCarter Temperature: 50 ° F Type of Inspection_ Inspection Coverage: ❑ Continuous ❑ Masonry ❑ Rebar Placement ❑ Founda#ions ❑ Special Cases: � Periodic �Wefding 8�Bolting ❑ Concrete ❑ Fireproofing ❑ Piles&Piers ❑Tendon Placement ❑Soils Did the architect or engineer authorize changes to City-approved plans? ❑ Yes (Listed Below) ❑ No Description and location of work compfeted: __ _ ___ ._. . ___ _ _ _ _ _ __ The following visual observations were performed on bar joists from slab on grade(various areas with damaged chords/lacings). Results as fallow to be reviewed by the joist supplier, Nucor: 1) Grid C 34 5th apex south of C, damaged diagonal bent approx. 1/2"-3/4" 2) Grid D 34 2nd apex north of D damaged diagonal bent approx. 1/2"-3/4° 3) Grid C.75 32 (approx. 12' north af Grid D) bottom chord of joist bent/twisted (approx. 3"-3 1/2"out of plumb)on east side of joist(hit mark apparent on bottom chord of joist). There is a 1/2"gap between top chord of joist to decking on the east side of joist. 4) �rid B-C 27 3rd joist west cf 27, 6th apex from C towrards B damaget! dia�onal bent a�prox. 1/2" 5) Grid B-C 27 4th joist west of 27, 5th apex from C towards B damaged diagonal bent appnc 1/2" 6) Grid B-C 27 5th joist west of 27, 6th apex from C towards B damaged diagonal bent approx. 1/2" 7) Grid B-C 25 5th apex from C towards B damaged diagonal bent approx. 1/2"-3/4" List tests performed: _ __ __. _ __ _ _. _ _. __ . . _.__ _ Visual _ _ _ __ ■ Are there any discrepancies noted from this day's observatians? Yes � No ❑ • Are there any outstanding discrepancies on this project? Yes � No ❑ o if yes, see attached Summary Sheet. ■ Report given to Contractor: Yes � No ❑ To the best of our knowledge,work inspected was done in accordance with the approved plans, specifications, and applicable workmanship provisions of the current IBC, except as noted above. Signed: Date: 12-17-13 Print Full Name: Daniel P. Graham &Troy Bauman I.D. No.: 1054095 S1&S2 � q�� tssue Date: 2013101f01 Rev No.: 0 ,�,3, '�, `9� he'� � � . .* �� ,� �:�,_t," . �� 4� � . � ��`' � � � � . ��`� � �� Special Inspection Daily Report �.. Page 2 of 2 City of Eagan, MN. Report No.: Structura!Steel#12 Date of This Report: 12-17-13 Project Name: Buiiding 100 Project No.: BL-12-D4579A Note: This is a continuation of a report. The first page of this report has information which should nof be separated from fhis continuation 8) Grid B-C 25 1 st joist west of 25 6th apex from C towards B damaged lacing approx. 1/2" 9) Gnd B-C 25 3rd joist west of 25 5th&6th apex from C towards B damaged lacings approx. 1/2"-3/4" 10) Grid B-C 24 2nd joist west of 24 3rd apex from G towards B damaged diagonal and vertieal bent approx.314" 11) Grid A.7-B 21 5th joist west of 21 2nd apex from B towrds A.7 tore aprrax. 1/2°midspan on diagonat 12) Grid B-C 21 2nd joist west of 21 8th and 9th apex from C towards B diagaonal bent approx. 1° 13) Gnd B-C 21 3rd and 4th joist west of 21 5th apex from C towards B diagonal bent approx. 1/2" 14) Gnd GD 9 1st joist east of 9 6th apex from D diagonal bent approx. 3/4"and bottom cord bent in approx 1/2" 15) Grid C-D 9 6th apex from D diagaona!bent apporx.3/4° 16) Grid GD 5 1st joist east of 5 5th apex C towards D diagonal benat approx. 1/2" 17) Grid GD 5 1 st and 2nd joist west of 5 6th apex from D vertical bent approx. 1l2" 18) Grid B.5 33.8 and C.75 27.5 bridging splices not wefded and/or not welded to joist 19) Bri�ging chord has�een cutout and remove�zt Grid B 34-34.5,g 3?-38,8 36 due to pipe penetratians(upli#t bridging,bridging removed in two spans between joists,x-bridge not installed) Note: majority of bent lacings/damage apparent fram handling(exduding Item 3 of fhis report). Random sample pictures were taken To the best of our knowiedge,work inspected was done in accordance with the approved p}ans,specifications and applicable workmanship provisions of the current IBC/UBC, except as noted above. Signed: �� Date: 12-17-13 Print Full Rfame: Daniel P. Graham &Troy Beuman I.D. No: 1054095 S1&S2 �" � „�,�°`z � . � . �� ; �,� Issue Date: 2013/01/01 Reu No.: 0 -�� , � � �� _ .�,,. �� =X�� Special Inspection Daily Report City of Eagan, MN. Page 1 of 1 Report No.: Structural Steel#13 Date of this Report: 2-26-14 Project Name: Building 100 Project No.: BL-12-04579A Project Address: 3905 Eagan Outlets Parkway Ctient: Paragon Out{ets Eagan Ctient Project No.: Weather: lndoors PM Brad McCarter Temperature: 5� ° F � Type of Inspection: Inspection Coverage: ❑ Continuous ❑ Masonry ❑ Rebar Placement ❑ Foundations ❑ Speciai Cases: � Periodic �Welding & Bolting ❑ Concrete ❑ Fireproofing ❑ Piles&Piers ❑ Tendon Placement ❑ Soils Did the architect or engineer authorize changes to City-approved plans? ❑ Yes (Listed Below) ❑ No Description and location of work completed: _ _ _ ___. _ _ ____ _ _. __ _ _ _ _ _ _ 1) Outstanding discrepaney on Report#12 92-17-13 Items 1-2,4-17 damaged bar joists have been repaired per Nucor fixes (Item#3 at Grid C.75 32 not completed). No discrepancy noted except the following: *A) Grid C 34 (south side)the diagonal from the end of joist up to the bar joist shoe has been heated and straightened rapprox.4"area west angle)with a spacer plate installed at top of angles. `B) Grid C 34 (south side) 1st apex south, south diagonal bent approx. 1/2" *C) Grid C 34 (south side)2nd apex south, north and south diagonal bent approx. 1/2". "D) Grid C 34 (south side)3rd apex north diagonal bent approx. 1/4". 2) Outstanaing discrepancy on Report#12 12-i 7-i 3 Item 1$) Grid i3.5 33.8 and C.75 27.5 bridging splices now we{ded andlor now welded to joist. No discrepancy noted 3) Outstanding discrepancy on Report#12 12-17-13 Item 19}Bridging chord has been rep{aced/reinstafled at Grid B 34- 34.5, B 37-38, B 36 at pipe penetrations now instal{ed and completed. List tests performed: __ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _. __ Visual ___ . _ _ . _ _ _ ■ Are there any discrepancies noted fram this day's observations? Yes � No ❑ ■ Are there any outstanding discrepancies on this project? Yes � NQ ❑ a If yes, see attached Summary Sheet. ■ Report given ta Contractor. Yes � No ❑ To the best of our knowiedge, work inspected was done in aceorciance with the approved plans, specfications, and appiicabfe warkmanship provisions of the current kBC, except as nated above. Signed: Date: 2-26-14 Print Full Plame: Daniel P. Graham I.D. Ido.: 1054(�95 S18�S2 , � x ��`�` ��` �`�-�� ; Issue Date: 2013l01/01 Rev Rio.: 0 I � �� ,� � {�._`� �`� �=,y i . ,� �� i, � ,,�� ' �'�-�� '- `,�'�'�r t`�'��m.�.j�.4�4�� '�(�s#i . . I�� ,�--��t.��' g, � �,��'��,��;,�� ; i �_��; Special inspectian Daily Report � . � i I i Gity of Eagan, MN. Page 1 af 1 ' Report No.: Structural Steei#14 Date of this Repart: 5-13-14 Project Name: Buiiding 100 Praject No.: BL-12-Q4579A Project Address: 39Q5 Eagan Outlets Parkway Ctient: Paragon Outiets Eagan Ciient Project No.: Weather. indoors PM Brad McCarter Temperature: 50 ° F Type of Inspection: Inspection Coverage: ❑ Continuous ❑ Masonry ❑ Rebar Placement ❑ Foundations ❑ Speciai Cases: � Periodic � Welding 8� Bolting ❑ Concrete ❑ Fireproofing ❑ Pifes& Piers ❑ Tendon Placement ❑ Soils Did the architect or engineer authorize changes to City-approved p{ans? ❑Yes (Listed Below� ❑ No i?escription and location of work completed: _ _ _ __ _ -__.._ _ _ _ _ 1) Outstanding discrepancy on Report#12 12-17-13 and#13 2-26-14 Grid C.75 32 and C 34 new bar joist installed in accordance with Nucor details. A490 1" hexhead bolts top chord tension bottom chord snug tight. Bar joist fillet welds to existing steel and tek fasteners to roof deck. No discrepancy noted _ List tests perFormed: _ _ _ _. _ _ __ _ _ Visua! _ __ __ __ _ _ . _ ._ _ _ _ _ • Are there any discrepancies noted from this day's observations? Yes ❑ No � ■ Are fhere any outstanding discrepancies on this project? Yes ❑ No � o If yes, see attached Summary Sheet. ■ Report given to Contractor: Yes � No ❑ To the best of our knowledge, work inspeeted was done in accordance witk�the approved plans, specifications, and applicable workmanship provisions of the current lBC, except as noted above. Signed: ��—f� �rC�h�m, �C�n Date: 5-13-14 Print Full Name: �aniet P. Graham I.D. No.: 1054095 S1&S2 Nolan Beron From: Jeffrey O. Graham <�Grahar-i@thorsonbaker.com> Sent: Friday, April 18, 2014 1:42 PM To: Dan Harlander <<� Nolan Beron;Jeff McKee Subject: RE: Paragon Da n, Please ignore the last part of my previous email regarding the screw attachment in the same deck ffute as the weld on the damaged joist. I mistakenly thought the damaged joist was staying. The 36/4 screw pattern is ok but should be located at a flute undamaged by the original deck welding. Sorry for the confusion. Thanks '� I Jeffrey 0. Graham, PE Project Manager � Structural Engineering Thorson Baker+Associates CONSULTWG ENGINEERS p: 330-659-6688 f: 330-659-6675 c: 330-523-5519 www.thorson ba ker.com Please consider the environment before printing this e-mai!or any of its attachments.Go Paperless and Go Green! The information contained in this message and any attachment may be proprietary, confidential,and privileged or subject tc the u.ark p�oduct doctrine and thus protecte�from discicsGre. �f the reader of this messa�e is not the intended recipient,or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination,distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify me imrr�ediately by replying to this message and deleting it and all copies and backups thereof.Thank you. -----Original Message----- From:Jeffrey O. Graham Sent: Friday; April 18; 2014 1:27 PM To: 'Dan Harlander' Cc: Nolan Beron;leff McKee 1 Subject: RE: Paragon Dan, . I talked to ITW Buildex and they toid me a 5 point TEK screw is not the proper screw for this application. Because the deck is only 22 gauge,the screw should probably to a 3 point. But in order to select the proper screw they would need to also know the joist top chord angles thickness. They said you can called them directly with this information and they could tell you the proper screw size. The 36/4 pattern is acceptable just ensure the TEK screw is in the same deck flute as the puddle weld on the damaged joist. leffrey 0. Graham, PE Project Manager � Structural Engineering Thorson Baker+Associates CONSULTING ENGINEERS p: 330-659-6688 f: 330-659-6675 c: 330-523-6819 www.thorsonbaker.com Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail or any of its attachments.Go Paperless and Go Green! The information contained in this message and any attachment may be proprietary,confidential, and privileged or I subject to the work �roduct doctrine �nd thus protected frorr� disclosur?. If the reader of this message is not the ��I intended recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient,you are hereby notified that any dissemination,distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify me immediately by replying to this message and deleting it and all copies and backups thereof. Thank you. -----Original Message----- Fr�m: Dan Harlander [�ailto:Dan.HarlandPr�RvanCompanies.com] Sent: Friday, April 18,2014 9:35 AM To:Jeffrey O. Graham Cc: Nolan Beron;leff McKee Subject: FW: Paragon Jeff Enclosed are the drawings of a couple joist we are replacing because of damage.Vulcraft is requesting verification of the fastening. A proposed fastening system is described below. We have requested that Vulcraft design the fastening however they need you to comment since Vulcraft is not aware of all design criteria of the building. Please let me know if you have any questions. Good to talk to you again,we must be getting close to the end. 2 Dan Dan Harlander � Project Manager II _ Ryan Companies US, Inc. � 50 South Tenth Street, Suite 300, Minneapolis, MN 55403-2012 651-280-5590 cell dan.harlander(a�rvancompanies.com -----Original Message----- From: Krystal Praught [mailto:krvstalCa�lincosteel.com] Sent:Thursday,April 17, 2014 4:05 PM To: Dan Harlander - Cc: 'Kristin Praught' Subject: Paragon Replacement joist drawings. We need to know how the structural engineer wants us to fasten the deck to the newjoist. We were thinking tech 5 screws with a 36-4 pattern from the bottom side through the joist into the deck. Let us know ASAP Thank you Thanks, Krystal Praught Linco Companies 12786 60th St. N.E St. Michael, MN 55376 Phone: 763-497-2660 Fax: 763-497-3986 E-mai1: krvstal@lincosteel.com Your message is ready to be sent with the following file or link attachments: Email Final 14 J13 1D52 JDS6 Note:To protect against computer viruses, e-mail programs may prevent sending or receiving certain types of file attachments. Check your e-mail security settings to determine how attachments are handled. 3 " ��£��°��k�u�,�= Issue Date: 2013I01/01 Rev No.: 0 t� � �� : �� x¢ ,t .�. '.� -��__; : � . �4 � � � = Summary of Discrepancies Needing Correction or Review � � . - � by the Design Engineer or Architect Project Name: Building 100 BL-12-04579A PM Brad McCarter Project Address: Eagan,MN. Structural Steel The following items must be reviewed by the engineer and/or corrected and/or inspected before work can continue in the area. Report No. Report Description Resolutian to O/C Status Date Discre anc 12 12-17-13 various random locations with damaged/bent bar joist lacings Nucor fix closed 2-26- 14 12 12-17-13 various random locations bridging not completed/cutout and welded/installed closed 2-26- remove 14 3} Grid C.75 32(approx. 12'north of Grid D)bottom chord of joist bentJtwisted(approx.3"-3 If2" out of plumb)on east side new bar joist closed 5-13- 12 12-17-13 of joist(hit mark apparent on bottom chord of joist). There is a installed 14 l/2"gap between top chord of joist to decking on the east side of'oist. 1) Outstanding discrepancy on Report# 12 12-17-13 Items 1-2, 4-17 damaged bar joists have been repaired per Nucor fixes (Item#3 at Grid C.75 32 not completed). No discrepancy noted except the following: *A) Grid C 34(south side)the diagonal from the end of joist up to the bar joist shoe has been heated and straightened(approx. new bar joist closed 5-13- 13 2-26-14 4"area west angle)with a spacer plate installed at top of angles. �stailed 14 *B) Grid C 34(south side) lst apex south,south diagonal bent approx. 1/2° *C) Grid C 34(south side)2nd apex south,north and south diagonal bent approx. 1/2". *D) Grid C 34(soutr side)3rd agex north diagonal bent ap rox. 1/4". �