The URL can be used to link to this page

3885 Eagan Outlets Pkwy _ _ Use bLUlt: or t3LA(:K mK I-Ftsr Office Use I I ri,`' ( I Permit City of 1 I Permit Fee: R v I 3830 Pilot Knob Road I I Eagan N 55122 I l Phone: (651) 675-5675 I Date Received: Fax: (651) 675-5694 I Staff; I I 2013 MECHANICAL PERMIT APPLICATION El Please subunit two (2) sets of plans with all commercial applications. Date: Site Address: Tenant: Suite 4: Resident/Owner Name: Phone: Address t City 1 Zip: Name:_ License Address: City: Contractor - Slate: Ci-1: F')one: Contact: - Email: New Replacement Additional Alteration Demolition Type of Work Description of work: NOTE: Root mounted and ground mounted mechanical equipment is required to be screened by City Code. Please contact the Mechanical inspector for information on permitted screening methods. RESIDENTIAL j COMMERCIAL Furnace New Construction Interior Improvement Permit Type -Air Conditioner Install Piping Processed 41 _ Air Exchanger Gas Exterior HVAC Unit Heat Pump Under/Above ground Tank Install Remove) Other s = RESIDENTIAL FEES $60.00 Minimum Add or alteration to an existing unit (includes $5.00 State Surcharge) $100.00 Residential New (includes $5.00 State Surcharge) _ $ TOTAL FEE G COMMERCIAL FEES Contract Value $ ~Do x .01 $55.00 Permit Fee Minimum $70.00 Underground tank installationlremoval = $ Permit Fee If contract value is LESS than $10,010, Surcharge = $5,00 Surcharge* **If contract value is GREATER than $10,010, Surcharge = Contract Value x $0.0005 If the project valuation is over $1 million, please call for Surcharge TOTAL FEE I hereby acknowledge that this information is complete and accurate; that the work will be in conformance with the ordinances and codes of the City of Eagan; that I understand this is not a permit, but only an application for a permit, and work is not to start without a permit; that the work will be in accordance with the approved plan in the case of work which requires a review and approval of plans. x , x Applicant's -riinted Name Signature FOR OFFICE USE g - Required Inspections: Revlvwed By: \ Date: / Underground Y Rough In Air Test Gas Service Test In-floor Heat final HVAC Screening ____Use BLUE or BLACK Ink I For Office Use C~tt 6 V Eapn 1(a n vt~ Permit I I Permit Fee: 3830 Pilot Knob Road I - - I Eagan MN 55122 I Date Received: ` I S Phone: (651) 675-5675 I I Fax: (651) 675-5694 Staff: r'1 1 2013 COMMERCIAL PLUMBING PERMIT APPLICATION ❑ Please submit two (2) sets of plans with all commercial applications. Date: Site Address: _ 3&r s- r-~4GM~y UV1<-l 1 ~/}n1C t v~,.~, J# ~VV Tenant: _ Suite Property Owner Name: Phone: Name: ` WO✓\ 12[LfA6rA( t4,%(- License#: (p7GPyS -Pry1 Contractor Address: 1` (S ~~'h S t d ~ .s City: 6T s State: MA Zip: Phone: 91Z y3 cY "9100 Email: Gw e U OSv✓) 114-4 . &f1-1,I Type of Work ~ New -Replacement -Repair _Rebuild - Modify Space - Work in R.O.W. I Description of work: COMMERCIAL New Construction Modify Space 9 _ Irrigation System yes / _ no) RPZ / _ PVB) • Rain sensors required on irrigation systems Permit Type . Avg. GPM (2" turbo required unless smaller size allowed by Public Works) Meters Call (651) 675-5646 to verity that tests passed prior to picking up meter. Domestic: Size & Type Fire: 1 Avg. GPM High demand devices? Yes No Flushometers Yes No COMMERCIAL FEES Contract Value $ 100, u tio X.01 $55.00 Permit Fee Minimum _ $ Permit Fee *If contract value is LESS than $10,010, Surcharge = $5.00 = $ Surcharge* **If contract value is GREATER than $10,010, Surcharge = Contract Value x $0.0005 ***If the project valuation is over $1 million, please call for Surcharge = $ TOTAL FEE Following fees apply when installing a new lawn irrigation system $ Water Permit Contact the City's Engineering Department, (651) 675-5646, for required fee amounts. $ Treatment Plant $ Water Supply & Storage $ State Surcharge TOTAL FEE CALL BEFORE YOU DIG. Call Gopher State One Call at (651) 454-0002 for protection against underground utility damage. Call 48 hours before you intend to dig to receive locates of underground utilities. www.oopherstateonecall.ora I hereby acknowledge that this information is complete and accurate; that the work will be in conformance with the ordinances and codes of the City of Eagan; that I understand this is not a permit, but only an application for a permit, and work is not to start without a permit; that the work will be in accordance with the approved plan in the case of work which requires a review and approval of plans. x I V-N, Y\ l, uos> x Applicant's Printed Name Applicant's Signature FOR OFFICE USE Approved By: Date: l3 Required Inspections: ZU-nder Ground ugh-In _ it Test Gas Test Final PRV Required: - Yes No Page 1 of 3 Use BLUE or BLACK Ink 2013 SEWER AND WATER CONNECTION AND AVAILABILITY CHARGES EXISTING COMMERCIAL PROPERTY (if applicable) Date: FOR OFFICE USE ONLY Property Owner: _ PRV required City R-O-W Permit Address: Phone Number: County R-O-W Permit Plumber: Contact Name: SEWER - WATER Sewer Service Water Service Sewer lateral charge Water lateral charge Sewer trunk Water trunk City SAC @ $100/unit Water supply storage MCES SAC @ $2,4351unit Receipt Date: Receipt Date: Treatment Plant @ $801/unit Permit Fee $60.00 Permit Fee $60.00 State Surcharge $5.00 State Surcharge $5.00 TOTAL: *Plumbing Permit Required - water meter to be acquired with building permit TOTAL: SEWER & WATER _ Sewer Service Water Service Sewer lateral charge Water lateral charge Sewer trunk Water trunk City SAC MCES SAC Receipt # Date Water supply & storage Receipt # Date Treatment plant Permit Fee $120.00 State Surcharge $5.00 *Plumbing Permit Required - water meter to be acquired with building permit TOTAL: Number of SAC units is determined by the Metropolitan Council Environmental Services (651) 602-1000. Sanitary Sewer Trunk Connection Charge applies if not charged sewer trunk by assessment in the past. 1-5 SAC units 1,780.00 per SAC unit r -----------------I 6-10 SAC units 8,900.00 plus 445.00 per SAC unit over 5 I For Office Use I I 11+ SAC units 11,130.00 plus 178.00 per SAC unit over 10 I I Permit I I I Permit Fee: I I I I Date Received: I I I L Staff: I Cc: City of Eagan Finance Department Page 2 of 3 ity of Eaiali 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan MN 55122 Phone: (651) 675-5675 Fax: (651) 675-5694 ,L) 11‘1°0 2013 COMMERCIAL BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION Date: May 16, 2013 Site Address: 3885 Eagan Outlets Parkway (Building 700) Use BLUE or BLACK Ink For Office USE* Permit #: 1 1OCI , I 44- tiA- 61'1' : Permit Fee: I • Date Received: 1) 11 113 Staff: Tenant Name: Paragon Outlets Cedar Grove (Tenant is: X New 1 Existing) Suite #: Former Tenant: N/A Name: Paragon Outlets Eagan LLC. Phone: 410-856-1812 Address 1 city / zip: c/o Paragon Outlet Partners LLC. , 217 East Redwood St. - 21st fir. Baltimore, MD 21202 Applicant Is: X Owner Contractor Description of work: A new 40,838 s.f. (GBA) shell retail structure including site work Construction Cost: $4 018,560 Name: Ryan Companies US, Inc. License It; N/A Address: 50 South 10th Street, Suite 300 city: Minneapolis Phone: 612-492-4312 State: MN Zip: 55403-2012 Contact Brian Kombrink Email: Brian.Kombrink@RyanCompanies.com Name: Dal Pos Architects, LLC/Taras Pawliw, AIA Address: 101 N. Clinton Stree, Suite 300 State: NY zip: 13202 Registration #: 43971 city. Syracuse phone: 315-422-0201 contact Person: Dennis E. Cox, AIAEmail: dcox@dalpos.com U , Exceoiccheln Licensed plumber instaltin • sewer/water service: .-3113MITfiti (0S -q - phone GALL BEFORE YOU DIG. Call Gopher State One Call at (651)454-0002 for protection against underground utility damage. Call 48 hours before you intend to dig to receive locates of underground utilities. wwwdooherstateonecalLorg I hereby acknowledge that this information is complete and accurate; that the work will be in conformance with the ordinances and codes of the City of Eagan; that I understand this is not a permit, but only an application for a permit, and work is not to start without a permit; that the work will be in accordance with the approved plan in the case of work which requires a review and approval of plans, x e811:7300.1 Irt (471.33,414_ Applicant's Printed Name Applicant's Signature Page 1 of 3 5U5 Ear nALA-s 14-1 DO NOT WRM BELOW THIS LINE 1c10 SUB TYPES Foundation V Commercial / industrial Apartments Miscellaneous WORK TYPES /New Addition Alteration Replace Public Facility Accessory Building Greenhouse / Tent Antennae Interior improvement Exterior Improvement Repair Water Damage Salon Owner Change DESCRIPTION gab Valuation 1, 1'1 II D4'0 Occupancy Plan Review V Code Edition (25% 100% V ) Zoning Census Code Stories # of Units 0 Square Feet # of Buildings Length Type of Construction rf Width REQUIRED INSPECTIONS Footings (New Building) Footings (Deck) Footings (Addition) */ Foundation ,Drain Tile v/ Roof: Decking I/Insulation Ice & Water Final Framing /Fireplace: Rough In Air Test Final Insulation Meter Size: Exterior Alteration -Apartments Exterior Alteration-Commercizil Exterior Alteration -Public Facility Siding Demolish Building* Reroof Demolish Interior Windows Demolish Foundation Fire Repair Retaining Wall *Demolition of entire building - give PCA handout to applicant MCES System SAC Units City Water Booster Pump PRV 4/1-C-Tre:/e— Fire Sprinklers Sheetrock ,0/ Final / C.O. Required Final / No C.O. Required v/ Other: Pi, -6' 5riPP/A/ Pool: Footings Air/Gas Tests Final Siding: Stucco Lath Stone Lath /Brick Windows /Retaining Wall ,/ Erosion Control Final C/O Inspection: Schedule Fire Marshal to be present: v Reviewed By: tin I- Building Inspector Yes No Reviewed By: r Planning cOMMERCIAL FEES Base Fee /9 e32. • 75 - Surcharge 1,1/41•4e //, 721 -29 Plan Review MCES SAC City SAC S&W Permit & Surcharge Treatment Plant Treatment Plant (Irrigation) Park Dedication Trail Dedication Water Quality 7, 7 . 10. Water Quality Water Supply & Storage (W Storm Sewer Trunk Sewer Trunk Water Trunk Street Lateral Street Water Lateral Other: 1141f 109q. 614/ Page 2 of 3 Dale Schoeppner Chief Building Official City of Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55122-1810 Dear Mr. Schoeppner: July 2, 2013 1 O The Metropolitan Council Environmental Services (MCES) Division has determined the SAC to be charged for the wastewater capacity demand for Paragon Outlets Building 700 to be located at3005 • Eagan Outlets Parkway within the City of Eagan. 3885' The City will be charged 4 SAC Units for this project, as determined below. Charges: Retail 38,687 sq. ft. @ 3000 sq. ft. /SAC Credits: Cedar Grove Phased Development Net Charge: SAC Units 12.90 9.00 3.90 or 4 The business information was provided to MCES by the applicant at this time. It is the City's responsibility to substantiate the business use and size at the time of the final inspection. If there is a change in use or size, a redetermination will need to be made. If you have any questions, call me at 651-602-1118 or email karon.cappaert@metc.state.mn.us. Karon Cappaert SAC Program Technical Specialist Environmental Services Division KC:ms: 130702A9 Determination expiration: 07/02/2015 cc: File, MCES Amy Griffin, City of Eagan (email) Salem R. LaHood, Paragon Outlets Eagan, LLC. (email) 390 Robert Street North 1 St. Paul, MN 55101-1805 Phone 651.602.1000 1 Fax 651.602.1550 1 TTY 651.291.0904 1 metrocouncil.org An Equal Opportunity Employer M ETROPOI,ITAaN C. C) ll N C L. Use BLUE or BLACK Ink For Office Use City of Ea an I Permit I S~ I Permit Fee: ~ • I 3830 Pilot Knob Road I I Eagan MN 55122 I ; Phone: (651) 675-5675 I Date Received: / (O )3 Fax: (651) 675-5694 I I ; Staff: ~ 2013 FIRE SUPPRESSION SYSTEMS PERMIT APPLICATION* Date: 09 ) Ztp 1 13 Site Address: 3805 E«4 U., jo, -ir ~s Porkwo,!4 Tenant: Suite Name: Phone: Property Owner Address / City / Zip: Applicant is: Owner Contractor Type of Work Description of work: new we f •c, EE' r mss; a n S.~se.rn Construction Cost: S3,000 Estimated Completion Date: to 1 Name: ,Ahrarr, P-rc Prv~C s -t-,on License Co 3!3 Contractor Address: 13'705 24f' Ave.- Su-}c \\n City: nni nne «pa 1 5 State:. M nl Zip: 5-4 44 1 Phone: C-7 62,) 2( .8 115 Contact: Cnc-l1'e N►,`PIC..r Email: C- rn - 1) y-OP, c+hcrnf,~re .Cann FIRE PERMIT TYPE WORK TYPE Sprinkler System of heads 3ga X New - Addition Fire Pump _ Standpipe Alterations - Remodel Other: Other: DESCRIPTION OF WORK: Commercial _ Residential _ Educational FEES Contract Value $ 5 3.ooo X.01 $55.00 Permit Fee Minimum = $ 530 Permit Fee If contract value is LESS than $10,010, Surcharge = $5.00 **If contract value is GREATER than $10,010, Surcharge = Contract Value x $0.0005 = $ 2rs _ 5n Surcharge* ***If the project valuation is over $1 million, please call for Surcharge _ $ SS to . 50 TOTAL FEE 3/4" Displacement Fire Meter - $245.00 2A5 Fire Meter 80J-50 TOTAL FEE *Requirements: 2 complete sets of drawings and specifications, cut sheets on materials and components to be used I hereby apply for a Fire Suppression System permit and acknowledge that the information is complete and accurate; that the work will be in conformance with the ordinances and codes of the City of Eagan and with the Minnesota Building/Fire Codes; that I understand this is not a permit, but only an application for a permit, and work is not to start without a permit; that the work will be in accordance with the approved plan in the case of work which requires a review and approval of plans. x C hmr I e M; 11 r x Applicant's Printed Name Applicant's Signature FOR OFFICE USE REQUIRED INSPECTIONS Hydrostatic Flow Alarm Drain Test _L,~<ough In Trip Pump Test Central Station Final Conditions of Issuance: i s 1 Permit Reviewed by e= Date: /0 / 11-3 I C!ty of Eaall 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan MN 55122 Phone: (651) 675-5675 Fax: (651) 675-5694 Use BLUE or BLACK Ink For Office Use Permit #: 1 Permit Fee: Date Received: Staff: 2014 COMMERCIAL FIRE ALARM PERMIT APPLICATION* Date: 3 - (`1- 14 Site Address: 3 SSS EA r' a. r, Tenant ?ARA 40✓` OrsTC, ET /v vu_ f»TC.rrr ?t;rLrwAy J Suite 8: State: ^' Zip: S S 3 Z 55 Contact: S#eut MA .IC DESCRIPTION OF WORK: FEES Commercial Residential $55.00 Permit Fee Minimum *If contract value is LESS than $10,010, Surcharge = $5.00 **If contract value is GREATER than $10,010, Surcharge = Contract Value x $0.0005 ***If the project valuation is over $1 million, please call for Surcharge Educational Contract Value $ _$ _$ =$ x .01 Permit Fee Surcharge* TOTAL FEE *Requirements: 2 complete sets of drawings and specifications, cut sheets on materials and components to be used I hereby apply for a Fire Alarm permit and acknowledge that the information is complete and accurate; that the work will be in conformance with the ordinances and codes of the City of Eagan and with the Minnesota Building/Fire Codes; that I understand this is not a permit, but only an application for a permit, and work is not to start without a permit; that the work will be in accordance with the approved plan in the case of work which requires a review and approval of plans. x ..34-e 01- fu\nt iC Applicant's Printed Name Clt of �a a� �e�o � � TO: Scott Peterson, Building Inspections # 20 Jon Hohenstein, Community Development Mike Ridley, Planning Darrin Bramwell, Fire Marshal Russ Matthys, Engineering John Gorder, Engineering Aaron Nelson, Engineering Leon Weiland, Engineering Jon Eaton, Utilities Eric Macbeth, Maintenance Gregg Hove, Maintenance Lt. Mike Fineran, Police FROM: Craig Novaczyk, Senior Building Inspector DATE: 6/13/2013 RE: Plan Review For: Paragon Building #700 3885 Eagan Outlets Parkway The plans are in our plan review section for your review and comment. Please return this form to my attention with your signed comments within 7 days. Please indicate any concerns you have with these plans and resolve these issues with the affected parties. If you are requesting that issuance of the building permit be held, please submit the proper"hold request"form to me. Comments: 1(��`�e�,,-�. �y ,��-��r Indicate below any fees that are to be collected with the building permit. Amount ❑ Yes ❑ No Landscape Security Required Zoning: ❑ Yes ❑ No Water Quality Dedication Meter Size: ❑ Yes ❑ No Park Dedication ❑ Yes ❑ No Trail Dedication ❑ Yes ❑ No Tree Dedication ❑ Yes ❑ No PRV Required Signature Date G:\Building Inspections\FORMS\Commercial Bldgs Final & Plan Review Letters Clt of �� a� �e�o � � TO: Scott Peterson, Building Inspections # 20 Jon Hohenstein, Community Development Mike Ridley, Planning Darrin Bramwell, Fire Marshal Russ Matthys, Engineering John Gorder, Engineering Aaron Nelson, Engineering Leon Weiland, Engineering Jon Eaton, Utilities Eric Macbeth, Maintenance Gregg Hove, Maintenance Lt. Mike Fineran, Police FROM: Craig Novaczyk, Senior Building Inspector DATE: 6/13/2013 RE: Plan Review For: Paragon Building #700 3885 Eagan Outlets Parkway The plans are in our plan review section for your review and comment. Please return this form to my attention with your signed comments within 7 days. Please indicate any concerns you have with these plans and resolve these issues with the affected parties. If you are requesting that issuance of the building permit be held, please submit the proper"hold request" form to me. Comments: Indicate below any fees that are to be collected with the building permit. Amount ❑ Yes ❑ No Landscape Security Required Zoning: ❑ Yes ❑ No Water Quality Dedication Meter Size: ❑ Yes ❑ No Park Dedication ❑ Yes ❑ No Trail Dedication ❑ Yes �No Tree Dedication ❑ Yes No PRV Required �.—.�... G � 27 - r3 Signat Date G:\Building Inspections\FORMS\Commercial Bldgs Final & Plan Review Letters r 4 Clt of �a a� �e�o � � TO: Scott Peterson, Building Inspections # 20 Jon Hohenstein, Community Development Mike Ridley, Planning Darrin Bramwell, Fire Marshal Russ Matthys, Engineering John Gorder, Engineering Aaron Nelson, Engineering Leon Weiland, Engineering Jon Eaton, Utilities Eric Macbeth, Maintenance Gregg Hove, Maintenance Lt. Mike Fineran, Police FROM: Craig Novaczyk, Senior Building Inspector DATE: 6/13/2013 RE: Plan Review For: Paragon Building #700 3885 Eagan Outlets Parkway The plans are in our plan review section for your review and comment. Please return this form to my attention with your signed comments within 7 days. Please indicate any concerns you have with these plans and resolve these issues with the affected parties. If you are requesting that issuance of the building permit be held, please submit the proper"hold request" form to me. Comments: Indicate below any fees that are to be collected with the building permit. Amount ❑ Yes ❑ No Landscape Security Required Zoning: ❑ Yes ❑ No Water Quality Dedication Meter Size: ❑ Yes ❑ No Park Dedication ❑ Yes ❑ No Trail Dedication ❑ Yes ❑ No Tree Dedication ❑ Yes ❑ No PRV Required Signature Date G:\Building Inspections\FORMS\Commercial Bldgs Final & Plan Review Letters Clt of �a an �e�o � � TO: Scott Peterson, Building Inspections # 20 Jon Hohenstein, Community Development Mike Ridley, Planning Darrin Bramwell, Fire Marshal Russ Matthys, Engineering John Gorder, Engineering Aaron Nelson, Engineering Leon Weiland, Engineering Jon Eaton, Utilities Eric Macbeth, Maintenance Gregg Hove, Maintenance Lt. Mike Fineran, Police FROM: Craig Novaczyk, Senior Building Inspector DATE: 6/13/2013 RE: Plan Review For: Paragon Building #700 3885 Eagan Outlets Parkway The plans are in our plan review section for your review and comment. Please return this form to my attention with your signed comments within 7 days. Please indicate any concerns you have with these plans and resolve these issues with the affected parties. If you are requesting that issuance of the building permit be held, please submit the proper"hold request"form to me. Comments: Indicate below any fees that are to be collected with the building permit. Amount ❑ Yes No Landscape Security Required Zoning: ❑ Yes No Water Quatity Dedication Meter Size: ❑ Yes ❑ o Park Dedication ❑ Yes ❑ No Trail Dedication ❑ Yes No Tree Dedication ❑ Y No P V Required -- U �'�j // Signature Date G:\Building Inspections\FORMS\Commercial Bldgs Final & Plan Review Letters Clt of �� a� �e�o Y � TO: Scott Peterson, Building Inspections # 20 Jon Hahenstein, Community Development Mike Ridley, Planning Darrin Bramwell, Fire Marshal Russ Matthys, Engineering John Gorder, Engineering Aaron Nelson, Engineering Leon Weiland, Engineering Jon Eaton, Utilities Eric Macbeth, Maintenance Gregg Hove, Maintenance �-� `t1�ci e��n�r� Police �T-' FR�. Craig Novaczyk, Se ior Building Inspector DATE: 6/13/2013 RE: Plan Review For: Paragon Building #700 3885 Eagan Outlets Parkway The plans are in our plan review section for your review and comment. Please return this form to my attention with your signed comments within 7 days. Please indicate any concerns you have with these plans and resolve these issues with the affected parties. If you are requesting that issuance of the building permit be held, please submit the proper"hold request" form to me. Comme s: � Indicate below any fees that are to be collected with the building permit. Amount ❑ Yes ❑ No Landscape Security Required Zoning: ❑ Yes ❑ No Water Quality Dedication Meter Size: ❑ Yes ❑ No Park Qedication ❑ Yes ❑ No Trail Dedication ❑ Yes ❑ No Tree Dedication ❑ Yes ❑ No RV R ired �--- � Signat e Date G:\Building Inspections\FORMS\Commercial Bldgs Final & Plan Review Letters A Structural Steel Special Inspection Final Report Cedar Grove Outiet Mall-Building 700 3905 Eagan Outlets Parkway Eagan, Minnesota Prepared for Paragon Outlets Eagan LLC Project BL-12-04579A luly 31, 2014 Braun intertec Corporation 4 Braun Intertec Carporation Phone:952•995•2�� . iiooi Hampshire Ave S Fax: 952•995•2020 Minneapolis,MN 55438 Web: braunintertec.com July 31, 2014 Project BL-12-04579A Mr. Steven Trainer Paragon Outlets Eagan LLC 217 E Redwood Street, 21st Floor Baltimore, MD 21202 Re: Structural Steel Special Inspection Procedural and Final Report Cedar Grove Outlet Mall—Building 700 3905 Eagan Outlets Parkway Eagan, Minnesota Dear Mr.Trainer: Please find attached to this procedural report the Structural Steel Special Inspection Final Report for the Cedar Grove Outlet Mall Building 700 Project and the supporting Special Inspection Daily Reports. Special Inspection and Testing Procedures The special inspection services were periodically provided by International Code Council (ICC) certified special inspectors in accordance with the requirements of the Minnesota State Building Code, Chapter 17 of the International Building Code (IBC) and the project plans and specifications. The purpose of special inspections is to provide a review of the contractor's work designated by the project structural engineer as needing special inspection under the guidelines of the IBC to determine compliance with the approved construction documents. The special inspector does not have the responsibility or authority to, nor is it the intent of special inspections to have them,judge or modify the construction documents. Only the structural engineer of record can do this. As the special inspections were completed, a Special Inspection Daily Report was prepared to summarize the results of our inspections and testing. A copy of this report was provided to the contractor's site representative for their review and records. As part of this report, items needing correction or discrepancies observed from the approved construction documents were noted. We also summarized the discrepancies documented in a Discrepancy Log: As needed, we also eontacted the project structural engineer for additional clarification on specific issues related to the drawings or discrepancies observed. Plans ar�d Specificati��s The plans and project documents available at the site were used for our inspections. From time to time, we received plan modifications from the structural engineer. When received,these were used to evaluate the work completed in the field. Visual Examination of the Field-Made Welds Visual examination of the field welds was conducted in accordance with American Welding Society (AWS) D1.1-2010, Figure 5.4 and Table 6.1 requirements and the requirements of the project plans and specifications. AA/EOE Prouiding engineering and environmental solutions since i957 - Paragon 0utiets Eagan LLC Project BL-12-04579A July 31, 2014 Page 2 Tension-Control Bolted Connection Observations Tension-control bolted connection observations were conducted to determine if the bolt holes were filled, if the correct bolts were used, if the nuts were fully engaged and if the splined end of the tension- control bolts had separated from the body of the bolt. Removal of the splined end is a direct indicator the bolt has been torqued to the minimum snap-off load. At connections where the splined ends were not, or could not be removed, the torque applied to the bolt by the contractor was determined using a hand-held torque wrench. In addition, each connection was observed for fit-up and to determine if the various plies were in contact with one another. Hex-Head Bolted Connection Observations Hex-head bolting observations were performed to determine if the bolt holes werp filled, if the correct bolts were used, if the nuts were fully engaged and if they appeared to be snug tight. Each hex-head bolted connection was observed for fit-up and to determine if the various plies were in contact with one another. Random bolts were also selected at various connections to determine if the nuts were snug tight. This was done using a wrench and cheater bar. Metaf Deck Weld and Fastener Observations Metal deck weld observations were conducted in general accordance with AWS D1.3-2008, Section 6.0 requirements and the requirements of the project plans and specifications. Items reviewed included the quality, size and spacing of the welds. In addition, the location and the completeness of the side-lap fastener installation were observed and evaluated. Column Anchor Bolt Observations The column anchor bolts were observed to determine if they were in place, and if the nuts were installed,fully engaged and snug tight. The base plates were observed to determine if they were in full contact with the adjoining surface. If required by the construction documents, we also observed if the piate washers were installed. Cold Form Metal-Framing Mechanical Fasteners Visual observations were conducted to determine if the mechanical fasteners used in the cold form metal-framing construction were placed in conformance with the requirements of the structural details, plans and specifications. ��.� • Paragon Outlets Eagan LLC Project BL-12-04579A July 31, 2014 Page 3 General In performing its services, Braun Intertec used that level of care and skill ordinarily exercised by reputable members of its profession currently practicing in the same locality. No warranty, express or implied, is made. Thank you for the opportunity to provide the special inspection and testing services for this project. After review of the attached Special Inspection Final Report, if you have any questions or require additional information, please call Dan Graham at 952.995.2524 or Marv Denne at 952.995.2510. Sincerely, BRAUN INTERTEC CORPORATION ,r°� /�'��`�� c'�.�''�-�--� �f�'C__.:� Daniel P. Gra am ICC Certified Special Inspector-Structural Steel and Welding � �� hristopher R. Kehl, PE Principal-Senior Engineer Attachment: Structural Steel Special Inspection Final Report c: Jeff Graham, PE;Thorson Baker&Associates, Inc. Mark Kronbeck;Alliant Engineering, Inc, James Miller; Dalpos Architects& Integrators Craig Novaczyk; City of Eagan Michael Thorson, PE;Thorson Baker&Associates, Inc. Brad McCarter, PE; Braun Intertec ��°�_,..��.�,�� Braun Intertec Coaporation Phone:952�495•2c�oo . uooi Hampshire Ave S Fax: 952•995•2020 Minneapolis,MN 55438 Web: braunintertec.com Structural Steel Special inspection final Report City of: Eagan Date: July 31, 2014 Attention: Mr.Steven Trainer Project: Cedar Grove Outlet Mall—Building 700 3905 Eagan Outlets Parkway Eagan, Minnesota Braun Intertec Project: BL-12-04579A In accordance with the Minnesota State Building Code, Section 1704 of the International Building Code and the agreed-upon scope of services,the required special inspections and testing have been provided for the following items: Bolting. The bolted connections detailed in the attached Special Inspection Daily Reports were observed in general accordance with the requirements of the plans and specifications. There are currently no outstanding or unresolved bolted connection-related issues. Structural Field Welding. The welded connections detailed in the attached Special Inspection Daily Reports were observed in general accordance with the requirements of the project plans and specifications. Discrepancies were noted and documented. These connections were found to be acceptable following the required corrections as provided by the engineer. There are currently no outstanding or unresolved structural welding-related issues. Metal Deck Welding and Fasteners. The metal deck welding and side-lap fasteners detailed in the attached Special Inspection Daily Reports were observed in general accordance with the requirements of the project plans and specifications.There are currently no outstanding or unresolved decking- related issues. Mechanical Fasteners. The mechanical fasteners detailed in the attached Special Inspection Daily Reports were observed in general accordance with the requirements of the plans and specifications. There are currently no outstanding or unresolved mechanical fastener-related issues. AA/EOE Prouiding engineering and enuironmental solutions since Y957 - Paragon Outlets Eagan LLC Project BL-12-04579A July 31, 2014 Page 2 Conclusion Based upon the inspections conducted,the testing performed and the attached reports, it is our professional judgment that,to the best of our knowledge, the inspected work was performed and completed in accordance with the approved plans, specifications,engineer-provided modifications and applicable workmanship provisions of the Minnesota State Building Code and the International Building Code. Inspecting Firm: Braun Intertec Corporation I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engir��er, under the laws of the State of Minnesota -;�"�j��t ��f`�r� �4-, �pH ��c:�,�. �.,rr�sW� � ,:,. ��Gl i� � _ .. � //s�� P , , > r•, 5 Z�� yfi ±i� f��;4 ,W, ��,.... ._� .., . . . ristopher R. Kehl, PE , ;A, Principal-Senior Engineer �',.> "_� License Number: 43459 .. f July 31, 2014 Attachments: Special Inspection Daily Reports 1 through 7 Summary of Discrepancy Log � � �I��;�. �'.� � �� ° Issue Date: 2013/01101 Rev Na.: 0 �� :��. >,; � g . �� . � �� . ' �. `.�.: ��.,,�� Special Inspection Daily Repart City of Eagan, MN. Page 1 af 1 Report No.: Structural Steel#1 Date of this Report: 9-03-13 Project Name: Building 700 Project No.: BL-12-04579A Project Address: 3905 Eagan Outlets Parkway Client: Paragon Outlets Eagan Client Project No.: Weather: Sunny PM Brad McCarter Temperature: 72 ° F Type of Inspection: Inspection Coverage: ❑ Continuous ❑ Masonry ❑ Rebar Placement ❑ Foundations ❑ Specia! Cases: � Periodic �Welding 8�Bolting ❑ Concrete ❑ Fireproofing ❑ Piles� Piers ❑ Tendon Placement ❑ Soils Did the architect or engineer authorize changes to City-approved plans? ❑Yes (Listed Below) ❑ No Description and location of work completed: _ __ _ __ _. _ - _ . _ _ _ _ . Visual weld observations were performed in accordance with AWS D1.1 Section 6 2010 criteria on the following: 1) Bar joist fillet welds Roof Level Grid B.5-G.1 40.5-44.2 per Nucor Vulcraft details. No discrepancy noted 2) Anchor bolts at Foundation Level Grid B.5-G.1 40.5-44.2 plies in direct contact with full nut engagement present. 3) A325 3/4"Tension control bolts at Roof Level Grid B.5-G.1 4Q.5-44.2 (various random locations splines end still intact, bolts hand tightened with wrench and bar). No discrepancy noted 4) Bar joist moment plate fillet welds Roof Level Grid B.5-G.1 40.5-44.2 per sheet S5.1 noted. No discrepancy noted 5) Drag strut angle from truss girder to beam fillet welds Roof Level Grid B.5-G.1 40.5-44.2 per Section S4 detail. No discrepancy noted _. _ .__ __ _ _ _ _ __ . _ ___ _ __ ___ List tests pertormed: _ _ -- _ _ _ _ _ _ . . __ _ _ _- .__ Visual _ _-_. _..__ _ _ __ _ _ _ , __ .___ __ _- ■ Are there any discrepancies noted from this day's observations? Yes ❑ No � ■ Are there any outstanding discrepancies on this project? Yes ❑ No � o If yes, see attached Summary Sheet. • Report given to Contractor: Yes � No ❑ To the best of our knowledge,work inspected was done in accordance with the approved plans, spee�cations, and applicable workmanship provisions of the current fBC, except as noted above. 3igned: �-"�t�.y�.�l.� Date: 9-03-13 Print Futl Name: Daniel P. Graham I.D. No.: 1054095 S1&S2 � _- �_��;. `�"� -��-�-�-; `,�_t. Issue Date: 2013/01/Oi Rev P{o.: 0 . '.� �� - � _ :�' � � �t� = � Special Inspection Qaily Report City of Eagan, MN. Page 1 of 1 Report No.: Structural Steel#2 Date of this Report: 9-05-13 Proje�t Name: Building 700 Project No.: BL-12-04579A Project Address: 3905 Eagan Outlets Parkway Ciient: Paragon Outlets Eagan Client Project Na.: LNeather: Sunny PM Brad McCarter Temperature: 72 ° F Type oi inspecfion: Inspection Coverage: ❑ Continuous ❑ Masonry ❑ Rebar Piacement ❑ Foundations ❑ Speciai Cases: � Periodic � Welding 8�Bolting ❑ Concrete ❑ Fireproofing ❑ Piles&Piers ❑Tendon Placement ❑ Soils Did the architect or engineer authorize changes to City-approved plans? ❑Yes (Listed Below) ❑ No Description and location of work completed: _ _ _ _ __._ __ ._ __ _ _ . _ _ Visual weld observations were performed in accordance with AWS D1.1 Section 6 2010 criteria on the following: 1) Bar joist fillet welds Roof Level Grid G.1-J.9 40.5-42.9 per Nucor Vulcraft detai4s. No discrepancy noted 2) Anchor bolts at Foundation Level Grid G.1-J.9 40.5-42.9 plies in direct contact with full nut engagement present. 3) A325 3/4"Tension controt bolts at Roof Level Grid G.1 J.9 40.5-42.9(various random locations splines end still intact, bolts hand tightened with wrench and bar). No discrepancy noted 4) Bar joist moment plate fillef welds Roof Level Grid G.1-J.9 40.5-42.9 per sheet S5.1 noted. No discrepancy noted 5) Drag strut angle from truss girder to beam fillet welds Roaf Level Grid G.1-J.9 40.5-42.9 per Section S4 detail: No discrepancy noted _ _ _ __ __ _ _ . . _ _._ _ -__ _ _ List tests performed: __ _ _ _ _ Visual _ - - _. . _ _._ . _ _ _. _ __ _ _ • Are there any discrepancies noted from this day's observations? Yes ❑ No � ■ Are there any outstanding discrepancies an this project? Yes ❑ No � o If yes, see attached Summary Sheet. ■ Report given to Contractor: Yes � No ❑ To the best of our knowledge,work ir�spected vras done in accordance with the approved plans, specificatians, and applicable workmanship provisions of the current IBC, except as noted above. :iigned: Date: 9-05-13 Print Fult Narr�e: Qaniel P. Graham I.D. Pto.: 1054095 S1&S2 �-�� t -�� • � �`'��' � ��- Issue Date: 2013t01/47 Rev No.: 0 ��.: „i '��a: 3 .. . 7� � � � � �� F £, fa �1 , ��,# �Ri�" 3a ��. A � Special Inspection Daily Report City of Eagan, MN. Page 1 of 1 Report No.: Structural Steel#3 Date of this Report: 9-09-13 Project Name: Building 700 Project No.: BL-12-04579A Project Address: 3905 Eagan Outlets Parkway Client: Paragon Outlets Eagan Client Project No.: Weather: Sunny PM Brad McCarter Temperature: 92 ° F Type of Inspectior�: Inspection Coverage: ❑ Continuous ❑ Masonry ❑ Rebar Placement ❑ Foundations ❑ Special Cases: � Periodic � Welding 8�Bolting ❑ Cancrete ❑ Fireproofing ❑ Piles&Pisrs ❑Tendon Placement ❑ Soils Did the architect or engineer authorize changes to City-approved plans? ❑Yes (Listed Below) ❑ No Description and location of work completed: __ __ .__ __ _. __ _. . Visual weld observatians were performed in accordance with AWS D1.1 Section 6 2010 criteria on the following: 1) Truss girder fillet welds Roof Level Grid B.5-G.1 40.5-44.2 and G.1-J.9 40.5-42.9 per Nucor Vulcraft details. No discrepancy noted _-- _ __ _ ___ . _ _ . _._ List tests perFormed: _ __ ___ _. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ ._. __ . Visual _ _ __ __ _ _ __ _ . _ _ _ __ _ • Are there any discrepancies noted from this day's observations? Yes ❑ No � ■ Are there any autstanding discrepancies on this project? Yes ❑ No � o If yes,see attached Summary Sheet. ■ Report given to Contractor: Yes � No ❑ To the best of our knowledge, work inspected was done in accordance with the approved plans, specifications, and applicabie workmanship provisions of the current IBC, except as noted above, Signed: Date: 9-09-13 Print Full Name: Daniel P. Graham i.D. No.: 1054095 S1&S2 �`� � �� Issue Date: 2093l01I01 Rev Na: 0 � �% 'j {• .�insx+-�'�.> � '"i� . � ^ ,.Y �� -�ae�.a > � . �;.. .��9, �.�. - � . y � �� Special inspection Daily Report r.�, City of Eagan, MN. Page 1 of 1 Report No.: Structural Steel#4 Date of this Report: 9-25-13 Project Name: Building 700 Project No.: BL-12-04579A Project Address: 3905 Eagan Outlets Parkway Client: Paragon Outlets Eagan Ciient Project No.: Weather: Sunny PM Brad McCarter Temperature: 72 ° F Type of Inspectian: Inspection �overage: ❑ Continuous ❑ Masonry ❑ Rebar Placement ❑ Foundations ❑ Special Cases � Periodic �Welding 8�Bolting ❑ Concrete ❑ Fireproofing ❑ Pi{es& Piers ❑Tendon Placement ❑ Soils Did the architect or engineer authorize changes to City-approved plans? ❑Yes {Listed Below) ❑ No Description and location of work completed: . _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ Visual weld observations were performed in accordance with RWS D1.1 and D1.3 criteria on the following: 1) Puddle welds and side lap fasteners at Roof Level Grid B.5-G.1 40.5-44.2 and G.1-J.9 40.5-42.9 per Nucor Vulcraft details. No discrepancy noted 2) A325 1/1/4"hexhead bolts at Raof Level Grid F.4-G.1 41 turn of the nut performed. No discrepancy noted 3) Light gauge metal stud PAF and tek fasteners at slide cilp Roof Level Grid B.6-G.1 44 per Excei drawings. No discrepancy noted 4) Column cap plate fillet welds at Roof Level (misaligned bolts holes, fillet welded on al!4 sides)Grid E.6 41, C.5 42- 42.9. Weld quality found acceptable 5) lntermediate tube steel to plate fillet we{ds Grid B.5-G.1 40.5-44.2 and G.1-J.9 40.5-42.9. No discrepancy noted 6} Tower tube steel/x-brace angle fillet welds Grid B.5-G.1 40.5-442 and G.1-J.9 40.5-42.9. No discrepancy noted 7) Deck support anglelsplice bar fillet welds at Roof Level grid B.5-G.1 40.5-44.2 and G.1-J.9 40.5-42.9. No discrepancy noted _ _ _ __ _ List tests perfiormed: _ . _ _ _ . _ _ Visual . __. _ . __ __ _ __ ____ ■ Are there any discrepancies noted from this day's observations? Yes ❑ No � • Are there any outstanding discrepancies on this project? Yes ❑ No � o If yes, see attached Summary Sheet. • Repork given to Contractor: Yes � f�o ❑ To the best of our knowledge, work inspected was done in accordance with the appraved p(ans, specifications, and applicable workmanship pravisions of the current IBC, except as noted abave. Signed: Date: 9-25-13 Print Fuii Name: Daniel P. Graham I.D. No.: 1 Q54095 S1&S2 � � ��` �� Issue Date: 20i3l01/01 Rev No.: 0 -ti� ��-�'�• � • � ;� � �1�� , ,�� ._��,. � �� Special inspection Daily Report City of Eagan, MN. Page 1 of 1 Report No.: Structurai Steel#5 Date of this Report: 10-31-13 Project Name: Suiiding 700 Project No.: BL-12-04579A Project Address: 3905 Eagan Outlets Parkway Client: Paragon �utlets Eagan Cfient Project No.: Weather: Partfy Cloudy PM Brad McCarter Temperature; 42 ° F Type of Inspection_ Inspection Coverage: ❑ Continuous ❑ Masonry ❑ Rebar Piacement ❑ Foundations ❑ Special Cases: � Periodic �Welding &Bolting ❑ Concrete ❑ Fireproofing ❑ Piles 8�Piers ❑Tendon Placement ❑ Soils Did the architect or engineer authorize changes to City-approved plans? ❑Yes (Listed Below) ❑ No Description and location of work completed: _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ___ _ _ Visual weld observations were performed in accordance with AWS D1.1 and D1.3 criteria an the following: 1) Bottom chord joist/truss girder to column stabifizer plate fillet welds at Roof Level Grid B.5-G.1 40.5-44.2 and G.1-J.9 40.5-42.9 per Nucor details. No discrepancy noted 2) Upliff angle from bar joist to truss girder/beam Roof Level Grid B.5-G.1 40.5-44.2 and G.1-J_9 40.5-42.9 per Nucor details. No discrepancy noted List tests perFormed: _ . _ _ . _ _ _ _- _ ____ Visual ■ Are there any discrepancies noted from this day's observations? Yes ❑ No � ■ Are there any outstanding discrepancies on this project? Yes ❑ No � � ff yes, see attached Summary SheeE. ■ Report given to Contractor: Yes � No ❑ To the best of our knowledge, work inspected was done in accordance with the approved plans, specifications, and applicable workmanship provisions of the current IBC, except as noted above. Signed: ��' Date: 10-31-13 Print Full Name: Danief P. Graham I.D. No.: 1054095 S1&S2 '� �'`� > � F� � �� 'f�� .��,��'� , {ssue Date: 2013/01/01 Rev Rfa.: 0 �� • � �`��.�-�� . � �- � � a�., £'� �"m,.,�."e�� `��r�� ` � ��,�-; �4�� ,6�� : Special Inspec#ion Daily Report City of Eagan, MN. Page 1 of 1 Repor� Fdo.: Structural Steel#6 Date of this Report: 12-30-13 Project Name: Building 700 Project No.: BL-12-04579A Project Address: 3905 Eagan Outlets Parkway Client: Paragon Outlets Eagan Client Project No.: Weather: Indoors PM Brad McCarter Temperature: 70 ° F Type of Inspection: inspection Coverage: ❑ Continuous ❑ Masonry ❑ Rebar Placement ❑ Foundations ❑ Special Cases: � � Periodic �Welding 8�Bolting ❑ Concrete ❑ Fireproofing � ❑ Piles&Piers ❑ Tendon Placement ❑ Soils � Did the architect or engineer authorize changes to City-approved plans? ❑Yes (Listed Below) ❑ No I Description and locati�n of work completed: _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ __ ._ _ The following visual observations were performed on bar joists from slab on grade (various areas with damaged chords/lacings). Results as follow to be reviewed by the joist supptier, Nucor: '`A) Grid J.2-J.7 40.7-42, 2nd joist south of J.2, 5th apex from 42 towards 40.7, east diagonal bent approx. 1/2" *B) Grid J.2-J.7 40_7-42, 3rd joist south of J.2,4th to 5th apex and 5th to 6th apex from 42 towards 40.7 bottorrt chord bent apprax. 1/2" *C) Grid B.5-C.2 42-44, 5th joist south of B.2, 5th apex from 44 towards 42, diagonal bent approx. 1/2" List tests performed:. _ _ _. . _ __ ___ _ . Visual ■ Are there any discrepancies noted from this day's observations? Yes � No ❑ • Are there any outstanding discrepancies on this project? Yes � No ❑ o If yes, sse attached Summary Sheet. ■ Report given to Contractor: Yes � No ❑ To the best of our knowledge, work inspectsd was done in accordance with the approved plans, specfications, and appiicable workmanship provisions of the current IBC, except as noted above. Signed: Date: 12-30-13 Print Full Name: Daniel P. Graham &Troy Bauman I.D. No.: 1054095 S1&S2 � '' ��'�` ��f` Pssue Date: 201310U01 Rev No.: 0 � �� -��•� -�,,.� r4:..,._3 �` ��'�� ."� � ' ,.., ��_�� -- � - �� Special Inspection Daily Report City of Eagan, MN. Page 1 of 1 Report No.: Structural Steel#7 Date of this Report: 4-14-14 Project Name: Buiiding 700 Project No.: BL-12-04579A Project Address: 3905 Eagan Outlets Parkway Ctient: �aragon Outiets Eagan Client Project No.: Weather: Indoors PM Brad McCarter Temperature: 70 ° F Type vf Inspection: Inspection Coverage: ❑ Continuous ❑ Masonry ❑ Rebar Placement ❑ Foundations ❑ Special Cases: � Periodic �Welding &Bolting ❑ Concrete ❑ Fireproofing ❑ Piles&Piers ❑ Tendon Placement ❑ Soiis Did the architect or engineer authorize changes to City-approved plans? ❑Yes (Listed Below) ❑ No Description and location of work completed: �sual weld observatians were perfiormed in accordance with AWS D1.1 2010 criteria on outstanding discrepancies listed on Report#6 12-30-13 on Item A} Grid J.2-J.7 40.7-42, Znd joist south of J.2, 5th apex from 42 towards 40.7, east diagonal bent approx. 1/2", Item B) Grid J.2-J.7 40.7-42, 3rd joist south of J.2, 4th to 5th apex and 5th to 6th apex from 42 towards 40.7 bottom chord bent approx. 1/2" and Item C) Grid B.5-C.2 42-44, Sth joist south of B.2, 5th apex from 44 towards 42, diagonal bent approx. 1/2" have now been repaired per Nucor fixes. No discrepancy noted __ __ _ _ _ List tests performed: _ _ _ _ Visual _ _ _ _. _ _ _ ._ __ _ _ _ _ _. ■ Are there any discrepancies noted from this day's observations? Yes ❑ No � ■ Are there any outstanding discrepancies on this project? Yes ❑ No � o If yes, see attached Summary Sheet. • Report given to Contractor: Yes � No ❑ To the best of our knowledge, work inspected was done in accordance with the approved plans, specifications, and appficable workmanship provisions of the current IBC, except as noted above. Signed: Date: 4-14-14 Print Full Name: Daniel P. Graham &Troy Bauman I.D. No.: 1054095 S1&S2 � ��'� y;�� , "� �� :� � Issue Date: 2013l09I01 Rev Plo.: 0 � ` �,��,�' ��`�� : .� ��` ,r a�..�m�.�. �' �. . �� - � Summary of Discrepancies Needing �orrection or Review � . � �T � _� � by the Design Engineer or Architect Project Name: Building 700 BL-12-04579A PM Brad McCarter Project Address: Eagan,MN. Structural Steei The following items must be reviewed by the engineer and/or corrected and/or inspected before work can continue in the area. Report No. Report Description Resolution to O/C Status Date Discre anc The follow�ing visual observations were performed on bar joists from slab on grade(various areas with damaged chordsllacings). Results as foilow to be reviewed by the joist supplier,Nucor: *A) Grid J.2-3.7 40.7-42,2nd joist south of J.2,Sth apex from 6 12-30-13 42 towa�'ds 40.7,east diagonal bent approx. 1/2" repaired per closed 4-14- *B) Grid J.2-J.7 40.7-42,3rd joist south of J.2,4th to Sth apex Nucor fixes 14 and Sth to 6th apex from 42 towards 40.7 bottom chord bent approx. 1/2" *C) Grid B.5-C.2 42-44, Sth joist south of B.2,Sth apex from 44 towards 42,diagonal bent a prox. 1/2" �