The URL can be used to link to this page

3925 Eagan Outlets Pkwy ;J Use BLUE or BLACK Ink For Office Use I I Permit City of Eapn I pus I Permit Fee: 3830 Pilot Knob Road J I Eagan MN 55122 I Date Received: Phone: (651) 75 Fax: (651) 675-5694 I Staff: I 2013 COMMERCIAL PLUMBING PERMIT APPLICATION ❑ Please submit two (2) sets of plans with all commercial applications. Date: -7-1- 13 Site Address: EAR G n U (,H4 k5 k4rk C4, b~ Z,(o U Tenant: Suite Property Owner Name: Phone: Y Name: V VSGv-\ Cyt L License 65 y Contractor Address: r . City: TG j,,S State: A IA Zip: -Tf3y a Phone: 91 00 Email: ~Gw/ J (/US~•'1~/~.vyFi•h .Lo.~ ) Type of Work New _Replacement _Repair _Rebuild _ Modify Space _ Work in R.O.W. Description of work: COMMERCIAL New Construction Modify Space Irrigation System yes / _ no) RPZ / _ PVB) • Rain sensors required on irrigation systems Permit Type • Avg. GPM (2" turbo required unless smaller size allowed by Public Works) Meters Call (651) 675-5646 to verity that tests passed prior to picking up meter. Domestic: Size & Type 0~,- Fire: 1 Avg. GPM High demand devices? _Yes No Flushometers~LYes _No COMMERCIAL FEES Contract Value $ d U 1 0 0 o X.01 $55.00 Permit Fee Minimum _ $ Permit Fee *If contract value is LESS than $10,010, Surcharge = $5.00 = $ Surcharge* **If contract value is GREATER than $10,010, Surcharge = Contract Value x $0.0005 ***If the project valuation is over $1 million, please call for Surcharge = $ TOTAL FEE Following fees apply when installing a new lawn irrigation system $ Water Permit Contact the City's Engineering Department, (651) 675-5646, for required fee amounts. $ Treatment Plant $ Water Supply & Storage $ State Surcharge TOTAL FEE CALL BEFORE YOU DIG. Call Gopher State One Call at (651) 454-0002 for protection against underground utility damage. Call 48 hours before you intend to dig to receive locates of underground utilities. www.gopherstateonecall.org I hereby acknowledge that this information is complete and accurate; that the work will be in conformance with the ordinances and codes of the City of Eagan; that I understand this is not a permit, but only an application for a permit, and work is not to start without a permit; that the work will be in accordance with the approved plan in the case of work which requires a review and approval of plans. x ` CL L l>y > x `2 Applicant's Printed Name Applicant's-Signature FOR OFFICE USE Approved By: Date: j Required Inspections: Under Ground Rough In Air Test Gas Test [Final PRV Required: _Yes _ No Page 1 of 3 Use BLUE or BLACK Ink 2013 SEWER AND WATER CONNECTION AND AVAILABILITY CHARGES EXISTING COMMERCIAL PROPERTY (if applicable) Date: FOR OFFICE USE ONLY Property Owner: _ PRV required i Address: Phone Number: City R-O-W Permit ~ - _ County R-O-W Permit Plumber: Contact Name: .._._--..v._....~__..._._ SEWER WATER Sewer Service Water Service Sewer lateral charge Water lateral charge Sewer trunk Water trunk City SAC @ $100/unit Water supply storage MCES SAC @ $2,4351unit Receipt Date: Receipt Date: Treatment Plant @ $801/unit Permit Fee $60.00 Permit Fee $60.00 State Surcharge $5.00 State Surcharge $5.00 TOTAL: "Plumbing Permit Required - water meter to be acquired with building permit TOTAL: SEWER & WATER Sewer Service ..............w._.. _....,...._...._w.,.._.,. Water Service Sewer lateral charge Water lateral charge Sewer trunk Water trunk City SAC MCES SAC Receipt # Date Water supply & storage Receipt # Date Treatment plant Permit Fee $120.00 State Surcharge $5.00 'Plumbing Permit Required - water meter to be acquired with building permit TOTAL: Number of SAC units is determined by the Metropolitan Council Environmental Services (651) 602-1000. Sanitary Sewer Trunk Connection Charge applies if not charged sewer trunk by assessment in the past. 1-5 SAC units 1,780.00 per SAC unit x----------------- 6-10 SAC units 8,900.00 plus 445.00 per SAC unit over 5 1 For Office Use 1 I 11+ SAC units 11,130.00 plus 178.00 per SAC unit over 10 I 1 Permit I I I 1 Permit Fee: I I I I Date Received: L 1 I I I I Staff: L----------------~ Cc: City of Eagan Finance Department Page 2 of 3 use BLUL or BLACK Ink For Office Use l Permit CRY U t 3830 Pilot Knob Road Permit Fee: q Eagan MN 55122 i i Phone: (651) 675-5675 l pate Received' I Fax: (651) 675-5694 I staff: 2013 MECHANICAL PERMIT APPLICATION ❑ Please submit two (2) sets of plans with all commercial applications. Date: Site Address: _ Tenant: _ Suite Resident/Owner game: Phone: - - . Address I City l Zip: Name: License Contractor Address: City: State: Phone: o"`'ct Email: c New Replacement Additional Alteration Demolition Type of Work Description of work: NOTE: Root' mounted and ground mounted mechanical equipment is required to be screened by City Code. Piease contact the Mechanical Inspector for information on permitted screening methods. Furnace New Construction T Interior Improvement Air Conditioner Permit Type _ Install Piping _ Processed Air Exchanger _ Gas Exterior HVAC Unit Heat Pump Under/Above round Tank r 9 InstallRemove) ~ Other 3 RESIDENTIAL FEES $60.00 Minimum Add or alteration to an existing unit (includes $5.00 State Surcharge) $100,00 Residential New (includes $5,00 State Surcharge) _ $ TOTAL FEE COMMERCIAL FEES - / Contract Value $X.01 $55.00 Permit Fee Minimum $70.00 Underground tank installationfremoval $ Permit Fee *If contract value is LESS than $10,010, Surcharge= $5.00 **If contrast value is GREATER than $10,010, Surcharge = Contract Value x $0.0005 - $ Surcharge* ***If the project valuation is over $1 million, please call for Surcharge $ TOTAL FEE I hereby acknowledge that this information is complete and accurate; that the work will be in conformance with the ordinances and codes of the City of Eagan; that I understand this is not a permit, but only an application for a permit, and work is not to start without a permit; that the work will be in accordance with the approved plan in the case of work which requires a review and approval of plans. X__ x Applicant's l-,rated blame Appti(.an` Sic Mature°- - - FOR OFFICE USE Required Inspections: Reviewed Sy: n Date: t~ Underground _)!~'Rough in Air Test YGas Service Test In-floor Heat Final HVAC Screening Date: Ea�aIl 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan MN 55122 Phone: (651) 675-5675 Fax: (651) 675-5694 JUtN Sg,1 II\'o15 Use BLUE or BLACK Ink For Office Use Permit #: 1144, ' Permit Fee: IM I.S9 Date Received: 46-1 Staff:�J 2013 COMMERCIAL BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION May 16, 2013 Site Address: 3925 Eagan Outlets Parkway (Building 400) Tenant Nam Paragon Outlets Cedar Grove (Tenant is: X New / Existing) Suite #: Forrner Tenant: N/A Name: Paragon Outlets Eagan LLC. Phone: 410-856-1812 Address / City / Zip: c/o Paragon Outlet Partners LLC. , 217 East Redwood St. - 21st flr. Baltimore, MD 21202 Applicant is; X Owner Contractor Description of work; A new 77,645 s.f. (GBA) shell retail structure including site work Construction Cost: $7,728,000 Name: Ryan Companies US, Inc. Address: 50 South 10th Street, Suite 300 State: MN Zip: 55403-2012 Phone: 612-492-4312 Contact: Brian Kombrink Email: Brian.Kombrink@RyanCompanies.com Name: Dal Pos Architects, LLC/Taras Pawliw, AIA Address: 101 N. Clinton Stree, Suite 300 Registration #: 43971 City: Syracuse State: NY Zip: 13202 Phone: 315-422-0201 Contact Person: Dennis E. Cox, AIA Email: dcox@dalpos.com Sf ctLtl (A f ) . r1t J*ve4 r<rj to51- •• - ' 7( Licensed plumber installing new sewer/water service. ' ' •• • Phone #: �-- CALL BEFORE YOU DIG. Call Gopher State One Cali at (651) 454-0002 for protection against underground utility damage. Call 48 hours before you intend to dig to receive locates of underground utilities. www:gopherstateonecal.org 1 hereby acknowledge that this information is complete and accurate; that the work will be in conformance with the ordinances and codes of the City of Eagan; that I understand this is not a permit, but only an application for a permit, and work is not to start without a permit; that the work will be in accordance with the approved plan in the case of work which requires a review and approval of plans. x -3R.T4Q oir isesxe_ Applicant's Printed Name Applicant's Signature Page 1 of 3 9)5 Ci.(Att,r‘ o(kAtt-6 ? K6)1 DO NOT WIFE BELOW THIS LINE Vld SUB TYPES /Foundation Commercial / Industrial Apartments Miscellaneous Public Facility Accessory Building Greenhouse / Tent Antennae W9RK TYPES New Interior Improvement Addition Alteration Replace Salon Owner Change DESCRIPTION Valuation Plan Review (25% 100% Census Code # of Units # of Buildings Type of Construction Exterior Improvement Repair Water Damage 7, 72' 00'0 04, 17 REQUIRED INSPECTIONS i/ Footings (New Building) Footings (Deck) Footings (Addition) V Foundation Occupancy Code Edition Zoning Stories Square Feet Length Width Drain Tile ‘,/ Roof: Decking Insul tion Ice & Water Final V Framing Fireplace: Rough In Air Test Final ./ Insulation Meter Size: Exterior Alteration—Apartments Exterior Alteration—Commercial Exterior Alteration—Public Facility Siding Reroof Windows Fire Repair Final. CIO Inspection: Schedule Fire Marshal to be present: Reviewed By: aftf6' , Building Inspector Demolish Building* Demolish Interior Demolish Foundation Retaining Wall *Demolition of entire building — give PCA handout to applicant 2067 iiiscit pp 1 13461 7— MCES System SAC Units City Water Booster Pump PRV Fire Sprinklers •/Sheetrock I./ Final C.O. Required Final / No C.O. Required -74 Other: bee $ro rot& Pool; Footings Air/Gas Tests _Fi. /Siding: Stucco Lath _Stone Lath Brick Windows Retaining Wall V Erosion Control v Yes No Reviewed By: Pfrii4 0 • , Planning COMMERCIAL FEES Base Fee Surcharge Plan Review MCES SAC City SAC S&W Permit & Surcharge Treatment Plant Treatment Plant (Irrigation) Park Dedication Trail Dedication Water Quality 32, 1548 .7r Water Quality / 4. 34. • Water Supply & Storage (WAC) 2/, 34.'4.61 Storm Sewer Trunk 1/0/ 1375. 6-0 Sewer Trunk Z CO e • •"-' Water Trunk 2-5-• dt-o Street Lateral 20/ LS" • Street Water Lateral Other: TOTAL sf /3Cf 3q4W Page 2 of 3 Dale Schoeppner Chief Building Official City of Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55122-1810 Dear Mr. Schoeppner: April 30, 2013 IIS The Metropolitan Council Environmental Services (MCES) Division has determined the SAC to be charged for the wastewater capacity demand for Paragon Outlets building 40Q to be located at 3925 Eagan Outlets Pkwy. within the City of Eagan. The City will be charged 25 SAC Units for this project, as determined below. The Council understands this building is speculative retail. SAC Units Charges: Retail (speculative) 73586 sq. ft. @ 3000 sq. ft. /SAC Unit 24.53 Net Charge: 24.53 or 25 At the time the finishing permits are issued, if the use changes from its speculative use to a different use, then the SAC assignment needs to be reviewed based on that change. The business information was provided to MCES by the applicant at this time. It is also the City's responsibility to substantiate the business use and size at the time of the final inspection. If there is a change in use or size, a redetermination will need to be made. If you have any questions, call me at 651-602-1118 or email karon.cappaert@metc.state.mn.us. Karon Cappaert SAC Program Technical Specialist Environmental Services Division KC: kg: 130430A2 Determination expiration: 04/30/2015 cc: J. Nye, MCES Amy Griffin, Eagan (email) Salem LaHood, Paragon (email) 390 Robert Street North 1 St. Paul, MN 55101-1805 Phone 651.602.1000 ( Fax 651.602.1550 1 TTY 651.291.0904 ( metrocouncil.org An Equal Opportunity Employer TAN 4,11`° C!tyofEaaafl 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan MN 55122 Phone: (651) 675-5675 Fax: (651) 675-5694 etaim Use BLUE or BLACK Ink For Office Use Permit #: I 1°19-00 1 VVf. ()‘.) Permit Fee: Date Received: Staff: 2013 FIRE SUPPRESSION SYSTEMS PERMIT APPLICATION* Date: 10127_12nt 2 Site Address: 3925 E . n Qu +tc i- 5 Po. r le car, v Tenant: Suite #: Property Owner Name: Phone: Address / City / Zip: Applicant is: Owner Contractor Type of Work Description of work: (.n- 'k,t /Or Sy6 fr Construction Cost: (38 f000 Estimated Completion Date: eJ09J2o / 3 Contractor Name: i9h ern e're Pr©Frc 4,-o n License#: (039 Address: /3705 2 " Ave_ . u.J-c 110 City: Plyrrio,.,d-h State: /") A/ Zip: 551:i Nl Phone: (76:3) 2.a8 _ OS/5 Contact: Cin arIt' C M. i(rf Email: CrnI'll el- /,e.,-n+*e(• Civil FIRE PERMIT TYPE Sprinkler System (# of heads ) WORK TYPE }/ New Fire Pump Standpipe_ _Addition Alterations Remodel Other: _ Other: DESCRIPTION OF WORK: Commercial Residential Educational FEES $55.00 Permit Fee Minimum Contract Value $ 138 r o00 x .01 .$ 1138© Permit Fee *If contract value is LESS than $10,010, Surcharge = $5.00 **If contract value is GREATER than $10,010, Surcharge = Contract Value ***If the project valuation is over $1 million, please call for Surcharge x $0.0005 = $ C,9 Surcharge* .$ 1/1-01i9 TOTAL FEE 3/4" Displacement Fire Meter - $245.00 = $ 216 Fire Meter = $ // (2 9 y TOTAL FEE Requirements: 2 complete sets of drawings and specifications, cut sheets on materials and components to be used I hereby apply for a Fire Suppression System permit and acknowledge that the information is complete and accurate; that the work will be in conformance with the ordinances and codes of the City of Eagan and with the Minnesota Building/Fire Codes; that I understand this is not a permit, but only an application for a permit, and work is not to start without a permit; that the work will be in accordance with the approved plan in the case of work which requires a review and approval of plans. x C('1G,.r 1.e Mi (i of Applicant's Printed Name Applicant's Signature l 19Yoo City of Eaffali 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan MN 55122 Phone: (651) 675-5675 Fax: (651) 675.5694 Use BLUE or BLACK Ink For Office Use 1)61 Permit*: Permit Fee: Date Received: Staff: (If v 3 00 IN 2014 COMMERCIAL FIRE ALARM PERMIT APPLICATION* Date: 3 " i ` t `4 Site Address: 3 G 2.5 EA (A r' c sT c Tt �'iA t'~tcL.0r►Y ga Tenant _ VRA Coo r' 08.,1"! T i M LL Suite d • i %a ,j�:,� , i �fef Work � ��-�; j r Name: Phone: Address / City/ Zip: Applicant is: Owner Contractor Description of work: Construction Cost: a t i ;Ore n Sr �1 y,,.. �1-+'i S"E 1` �1 ��+� J'� Estimated Completion Date: /, /%�� ! �� /r CQnfracfor f __ ii j %i iii ''-'•,--f--- %j/% / Name: Arse/ 1 7[c�.,.{o tS�r.�� S O (S�-1moi ��I �' License #: Address: SvAC & ct3S� S (23 ST v`/ City:A State: (" t t� Zip: S �j c(S 2 - �i'co o • Sof` .; 2 p Phone: . 'S'# eve- AA k ccup c c c Caw. Contact Email: 5'� �^ ~r C AA 'VG / �� orC R -% ..C? ryeW _ Addition Remodel Other: — Alterations DESCRIPTION OF WORK: Commercial — Residential Educational FEES $55.00 Permit Fee Minimum _ Contract Value $ `., / x .01 = $IPPermit Fee *If contract value is LESS than $10,010, Surcharge **If contract value is GREATER than $10,010, ***If the project valuation is over $1 million, please = $5.00 Surcharge = Contract Value x $0.0005 = $ Surcharge* call for Surcharge U ,ay _ $ i + TOTAL FEE *Requirements: 2 complete sets of drawings and specifications, cut sheets on materials and components to be used I hereby apply for a Fire Alarm permit and acknowledge that the information is complete and accurate; that the work will be in conformance with the ordinances and codes of the City of Eagan and with the Minnesota Biilding/Fire Codes; that I understand this is not a permit, but only an application for a permit, and work is not to start without a permit; that the work will be in accordance with the approved plan in the case of work which requires a review and approval of plans. x Ske t& /" SAG k Applicant's Printed Name n/L4. A • icaant's Signature C�t of �a a� �e�o � � TO: Scott Peterson, Building Inspections #�', 20 Jon Hohenstein, Community Development Mike Ridley, Planning Darrin Bramwell, Fire Marshal Russ Matthys, Engineering John Gorder, Engineering Aaron Nelson, Engineering Leon Weiland, Engineering Jon Eaton, Utilities Eric Macbeth, Maintenance Gregg Hove, Maintenance Lt. Mike Fineran, Police FROM: Craig Novaczyk, Senior Building Inspector DATE: 5/15/2013 RE: Plan Review For: Paragon Building #400 3925 Eagan Outlets Parkway The plans are in our plan review section for your review and comment. Please return this form to my attention with your signed comments within 7 days. Please indicate any concerns you have with these plans and resolve these issues with the affected parties. If you are requesting that issuance of the building permit be held, please submit the proper"hold request" form to me. Comments: ��<2r1�C.J �o �.. ��^^� ��/' Indicate below any fees that are to be collected with the building permit. Amount ❑ Yes ❑ No Landscape Security Required Zoning: ❑ Yes ❑ No Water Quality Dedication Meter Size: ❑ Yes ❑ No Park Dedication ❑ Yes ❑ No Trail Dedication ❑ Yes ❑ No Tree Dedication ❑ Yes ❑ No PRV Required Signature Date G:\Building Inspections\FORMS\Commercial Bldgs Final & Plan Review Letters Clt of Ea a� �e�o � � TO: 1.Scott Peterson, Building Inspections # 22 ��n Hohenstein, Community Development ✓Mike Ridley, Planning ✓'�arrin Bramwell, Fire Marshal Russ Matthys, Engineering John Gorder, Engineering Aaron Nelson, Engineering �eon Weiland, Engineering Jon Eaton, Utilities v'�ric Macbeth, Maintenance ✓Gregg Hove, Maintenance Lt. Mike Fineran, Police FROM: Craig Novaczyk, Senior Building Inspector DATE: 5/15/2013 RE: Plan Review For: Paragon Building #400 3925 Eagan Outlets Parkway The plans are in our plan review section for your review and comment. Please return this form to my attention with your signed comments within 7 days. Please indicate any concerns you have with these plans and resolve these issues with the affected parties. If you are requesting that issuance of the building permit be held, please submit the proper"hold request"form to me. Comments: Indicate below any fees that are to be collected with the building permit. Amount ❑ Yes ❑ No Landscape Security Required Zoning: ❑ Yes ❑ No Water Quality Dedication Meter Size: ❑ Yes ❑ No Park Dedication ❑ Yes ❑ No Trail Dedication ❑ Yes ❑ No Tree Dedication ❑ Yes ❑ No PRV Required Signature Date G:\Building Inspections\FORMS\Commercial Bldgs Final & Plan Review Letters � �eI[10 Clt of �a a� � � TO: Scott Peterson, Building Inspections #� Jon Hohenstein, Community Development Z`=� Mike Ridley, Planning Darrin Bramwell, Fire Marshal Russ Matthys, Engineering John Gorder, Engineering Aaron Nelson, Engineering Leon Weiland, Engineering Jon Eaton, Utilities Eric Macbeth, Maintenance Gregg Hove, Maintenance Lt. Mike Fineran, Police FROM: Craig Novaczyk, Senior Building Inspector DATE: 5/15/2013 RE: Plan Review For: Paragon Building #400 3925 Eagan Outlets Parkway The plans are in our plan review section for your review and comment. Please return this form to my attention with your signed comments within 7 days. Please indicate any concerns you have with these plans and resolve these issues with the affected parties. If you are requesting that issuance of the building permit be held, please submit the proper"hold request" form to me. Comments: Indicate below any fees that are to be collected with the building permit. Amount ❑ Yes ❑ No Landscape Security Required Zoning: ❑ Yes ❑ No �Nater Quality Dedication Meter Size: ❑ Yes ❑ No Park Dedication ❑ Yes ❑ No Trail Dedication ❑ Yes ❑ No Tree Dedication ❑ Yes ❑ No PRV Required Signature Date G:1Building Inspections\FORMS\Commercial Bldgs Final & Plan Review Letters Clt of �a �� e�o � � TO: Scott Peterson, Building Inspections #� Jon Hohenstein, Community Development �a Mike Ridley, Planning Darrin Bramwell, Fire Marshal Russ Matthys, Engineering John Gorder, Engineering Aaron Nelson, Engineering Leon Weiland, Engineering Jon Eaton, Utilities Eric Macbeth, Maintenance Gregg Hove, Maintenance Lt. Mike Fineran, Police FROM: Craig Novaczyk, Senior Building Inspector DATE: 5/15/2013 RE: Plan Review For: Paragon Building #400 3925 Eagan Outlets Parkway The plans are in our plan review section for your review and commerit. Please return this form to my attention with your signed comments within 7 days. Please indicate any concerns you have with these plans and resolve these issues with the affected parties. If you are requesting that issuance of the building permit be held, please submit the proper"hold request"form to me. Comments: � Indicate below any fees that are to be collected with the building permit. Amount ❑ Yes ❑ No Landscape Security Required Zoning: ❑ Yes ❑ No Water Quality Dedication Meter Size: ❑ Yes ❑ No Park Dedication ❑ Yes ❑ No Trail Dedication ❑ Yes ❑ No Tree Dedication ❑ Yes N PRV Required 1 r3 Si Date G:\Building Inspections\FORMS\Commercial Bldgs Final & Plan Review Letters ��^ Clt of �a �� e�o � � TO: Scott Peterson, Building inspections #�2',� Jon Hohenstein, Community Development Mike Ridley, Planning Darrin Bramweil, Fire Marshal Russ Matthys, Engineering John Gorder, Engineering Aaron Nelson, Engineering Leon Weiland, Engineering Jon Eaton, Utilities Eric Macbeth, Maintenance Gregg Hove, Maintenance Lt. Mike Fineran, Police FROM: Craig Novaczyk, Senior Building Inspector DATE: 5/15/2013 RE: Plan Review For: Paragon Building #400 3925 Eagan Outlets Parkway The plans are in our plan review section for your review and comment. Please return this form to my attention with your signed comments within 7 days. Please indicate any concerns you have with these plans and resolve these issues with the affected parties. If you are requesting that issuance of the building permit be held, please submit the proper"hold request"form to me. Comments: � � ��; Indicate below any fees that are to be collected with the building permit. Amount �� ❑ Yes � No Landscape Security Required Zoning: ❑ Yes No Water Quality Dedication Meter Size: ❑ Yes �. No Park Dedication ❑ Yes �. No Trail Dedication ❑ Yes � No Tree Dedication ❑ Yes ❑ No PRV Required � , �'`�v�l� r �r�� J 1 ��1 �� Signature � Date G:\Building Inspections\FORMS\Commercial Bldgs Final & Plan Review Letters Clt of �a a� �e�o � � TO: Scott Peterson, Building Inspections #�� Jon Hohenstein, Community Development Mike Ridley, Planning Darrin Bramwell, Fire Marshal Russ Matthys, Engineering John Gorder, Engineering Aaron Nelson, Engineering Leon Weiland, Engineering Jon Eaton, Utilities Eric Macbeth, Maintenance Gregg Hove, Maintenance Lt. Mike Fineran, Police FROM: Craig Novaczyk, Senior Building Inspector DATE: 5/15/2013 RE: Plan Review For: Paragon Building #400 3925 Eagan Outlets Parkway The plans are in our plan review section for your review and comment. Please return this form to my attention with your signed comments within 7 days. Please indicate any concerns you have with these plans and resolve these issues with the affected parties. If you are requesting that issuance of the building permit be held, please submit the proper"hold request"form to me. Comments: Indicate below any fees that are to be collected with the building permit. Amount ❑ Yes ❑ No Landscape Security Required Zoning: ❑ Yes ❑ No Water Quality Dedication Meter Size: ❑ Yes ❑ No Park Dedication ❑ Yes ❑ No Trail Dedication ❑ Yes ❑ No Tree Dedication ❑ Yes ❑ No PRV Required _��-�-- ��/ 3 Signature Date G:\Building Inspections\FORMS\Commercial Bldgs Final & Plan Review Letters Clt of �a �� e�o � � TC?: Scott Peterson, Buiiding Inspections #�� Jon Hohenstein, Community Development Mike Ridley, Planning Darrin Bramweil, Fire Marshal Russ Matthys, Engineering John Gorder, Engineering Aaron Nelson, Engineering Leon Weiland, Engineering Jon Eaton, Utilities Eric Macbeth, Maintenance Gregg Hove, Maintenance Lt. Mike Fineran, Police FROM: Craig Novaczyk, Senior Building Inspector DATE: 5/15/2013 RE: Plan Review For: Paragon Building #400 3925 Eagan Outlets Parkway !i i i The plans are in our plan review section for your review and comment. Please return this form to my attention with your signed comments within 7 days. Please � indicate any concerns you have with these plans and resolve these issues with the affected parties. If you are requesting that issuance of the building permit be held, please submit the proper"hold request" form to me. Comments: Indicate below any fees that are to be collected with the building permit. Amount ❑ Yes ❑ No Landscape Security Required Zoning: ❑ Yes ❑ No Water Quality Dedication Meter Size: ❑ Yes ❑ No Park Dedication ❑ Yes ❑ No Trail Dedication ❑ Ye ❑ No Tree Dedication ❑ Ye 1 ❑ o PRV Required , � � � 3� � ►3 � Si at re Date G:\Building Inspections\FORMS\Commercia► Bldgs Final & Plan Review Letters Clt of �a a� �e�o � � TO: Scott Peterson, Buiiding Inspections # 22 Jon Hohenstein, Community Development Mike Ridley, Planning Darrin Bramwell, Fire Marshal Russ Matthys, Engineering John Gorder, Engineering Aaron Nelson, Engineering Leon Weiland, Engineering Jon Eaton, Utilities Eric Macbeth, Maintenance Gregg Hove, Maintenance Lt. Mike Fineran, Police FROM: Craig Novaczyk, Senior Building Inspector DATE: 5/15/2013 RE: Plan Review For: Paragon Building #400 3925 Eagan Outlets Parkway The plans are in our plan review section for your review and comment. Please return this form to my attention with your signed comments within 7 days. Please indicate any concerns you have with these plans and resolve these issues with the affected parties. If you are requesting that issuance of the building permit be held, please submit the proper"hold request"form to me. Comments: ��l ��C�, r-�ti.r/ �t S � f��Y��h �od c� Indicate below any fees that are to be collected with the building permit. Amount ❑ Yes ❑ No Landscape Security Required Zoning: ❑ Yes ❑ No Water Quality Dedication Meter Size: ❑ Yes ❑ No Park Dedication ❑ Yes ❑ No Trail Dedication ❑ Yes ❑ No Tree Dedication ❑ Yes ❑ No PRV Required S' � �/26 J � 3 Signature Date G:\Building Inspections\FORMS\Commercial Bldgs Final & Plan Review Letters , Envelope Compliance Test Results Building_400 Project Summary)nformation Name:Building_400 Address; 3925 Eagan Outlets Parkway City/State/Zip: Eagan, MN Glimate Location:Eagan, Minnesota Standard EnvStd climate data is used for compliance Criteria Table: 6A Floor Area(ftzj; 83647 Gross Wall Area(ft2): 18225 Window Area(ft2):9414 Window Wall Ratio: 0.517 __ ___ ___ _. . _ _. __ __ Gross Roofi Area(ft2): 83647 . . . Skylight Area(ftZ);0 Skylight Roof Ratio:0.000 Door Area (ft2):0 Com liance Summa --PASSES EPF Pro osed Standard Mar in Roofs 6650 9976 3325 Skylights 0 0 0 Exte�ior Walls and Windows 8075 8398 323 Below-Grade Waps 0 0 0 Floors 0 0 0 Slabs 0 0 0 Daylighting Potential 17610 18545 934 Total 32336 36918 4582 O a ue Construction Schedule Code Descri tion Net Area/Len th U-factor HC R-Cav R-Shth G1 Metal Framing-Metal Framing-3.5 in. (89 mm) 8811 0.055 n.a. 13A 10.0 studs at 16 in. (400 mm)o.c.-Wall,Above Grade Rcav-13+ Rshth-10 C-2 Insulation Entirely Above Deck or Mass- 83647 0.042 n.a. 0.0 23.0 Insulation Entirely Above Deck or Mass-Roof R- 23 Total 92458 Fenestration Schedule Cotle Descri tion Area U-factor SHGC SC Tvis G-1 ' User Defined-Window-Fixed-Aluminum with Thermal 9414 0.500 0.730 0.849 0.800 Break-Clear-Tenant Glass (User Defined) Total 9414 Area Space Category:Bldg_400 Floor Area(ft2);83647 Gross WaII Area(ft2): 18225 WindowArea(ft2):9414 Window Wall Ratio:0.517 Gross Roof Area(ftz):83647 Skylight Area(ft2); 0 Skylight Roof Ratio: 0.000 Door Area (ft2):0 SurFaces Name T e Const.Code Area Orient Notes Roof Roof G2 83647 nla n.a. North_Wall,W Wall C-1 3210 North n.a. ith Cano ASHRAE/IESNAStandard 90.1-2004 05/'13/13 Envelope Comptiance Test Results Building�400 North Wall,_W Wall C-1 2415 North n.a. ith_No_Canop Y North West_ Wall C-1 450 Northwest n.a Wall West_Wall Wall C-1 2805 West n.a. South_Wall,_ Wall C-1 3300 South n.a. With Ganopy � � South_Wall,_ Wall C-1 2595 South n.a. ` With No Cano PY — — South_East_W Wall C-1 570 Southeast n.a. all East_Wall,_Wi Wall C-1 1380 East n.a. th Canopy East_Wall_Wit Wall G1 930 North n.a. h No Canopy Northeast_Wal Wali C-1 570 Northeast n.a. I Total 101872 O enin s Narne T e Const. Code Area Orient. Notes Glass Window G1 1674 North Overhang PF=0.35 North_Glass_w Window G-1 1278 North Overhang PF=0.44 ith Overhang Glass Window G1 153 Northwest Overhang PF= 1.11 West_Glass Window G-1 1422 West Overhang PF= 1.11 Glass Window G-1 1728 South Overhang PF=0.35 South Glass_ Window G-1 225 South Overhang PF= 1.11 with 10' Over hang South Glass Window G-1 981 South Overhang PF=0.44 with 4' Overh ang South Giass Window G-1 261 South n.a. Without overh ang Southeast_Gla Window G-1 162 Southeast Overhang PF= 1.11 ss Glass Window G-1 828 East Overhang PF=0:35 East Glass Window G-1 486 North Overhang PF=0.44 Northeast_Gla Window G-1 216 Northeast Overhang PF= 1.11 ss Total 9414 ASHRAE/IESNAStandard 90.1-2004 05/13/13 ' � • � • � • •' • • � • • ' • Project Name: Paragon Outlets Buiiding 400 Project Address:3925 Eagan Outlets Parkway Eagan,MN Date: 3!4/2013 City: Eagen Zip: 55122 HVAC System Designer of Record:Jeffrey M.Zunt Telephone: 330-659-6688 Contact Person:Jeffrey M.Zunt Telephone: 330-659-6688 Qualification o Exception:An energy recovery o (j)Piping is insulated in accordance with ventilation system is provided in Table 6.8.3.lnsulation exposed to weather is ❑ The building is 2 stories orless in height and accordance with the requirements in suitable for outdoor service.Cellular foam has a gross floor area is less than 25,000 ft2. §6.5.6, insulation is protected from water and solar Requirements ❑ (f)The system shall be controlled by a radiation. manual changeover or dual setpoint ❑ Exception:Piping is located within o (a)All systems serve a single HVAC zone. thermostat. manufactured HVAC units. o (b)Cooling(if any)is provided by a unitary ❑ (g)Heat pumps equipped with auxiliary o (k)Ductwork and plenums are insulated in packaged or split-system air conditioner that intemal electric resistance heaters(if any) accordance with Tables 6.8.2A and 6.82B is either air-cooled or evaporatively cooled have controls to prevent supplemental heater and sealed in accordance with Tables and meets the efficiency requirements shown operation when the heating load can be met 6.4.42A and 6.4.4.2B. in Table 6.8.1.List equipment in the table by the heat pump alone. below. o (I)Construction documents require air ❑ (h)The system controis do not permit reheat systems to be balanced in accordance with o (c)The system has an air economizer as or any other form of simultaneous heating industry-accepted procedures to within 10% required by Table 6.5.1,with controls as and cooling for humidity control. of design airFlow rates. required in Tables 6:5.1.1.3A and 6.5.1.1.3B. The economizer has eithe�barometric or o (i)Systems are provided with a time switch o (m)Where separate heating and cooling powered relief sized to peevent that(1)can start and stop the system under equipment seNe the same temperature zone, overpressurization of the building.Outdoor air different schedules for seven different day- thermostats are interiocked to prevent dampers fo�the economizer use are provided types perweek;(2)is capable of retaining simultaneous heating and cooling. with blade and jamb seals. programming and time setting during a loss of power for a period of at least 10 h;(3) o (n)Exhausts are equipped with gravity or o Exception:The cooling e�ciency meets includes an accessible manual override fhat motorized dampers that will automaticaliy or exceeds the efficiency requirement in allows temporary operation of the system for shut when systems are not in use. Table 6.3.2.Document'in table below. up to 2 h;(4)is,capable of temperature setback down to 55°F during off hours;and O Exception:Design capacity is less than O (d)Heating(if any)shall be p�ovided by a (5)is capable of temperature setup to 90°F 300 cfm. unitary packagetl or split-system heat,pump, during off hours. ❑ Exception:System operates a fuel-fired furnace,an elect�ic resistance heater or a baseboard system connected to a ❑ Exception:System serves hotel/motel continuously. boiler.All heating equipment meets the guest rooms. p (o)Systems have optimum start controls. efficiency requirements of the Standard.List ❑ Exception:System operates equipment in table below. continuousiy. o Exception:Supply air capacity is less ❑ e The outdoor air uanti than 10,000 cfm. ( ) q ty is less than or ❑ Exception: System has both a cooling equal to 3,000 cfm and less than or 70%of or heating capacity less than 15,000 the supply air quantity at minimum outdoor air Btu/h and a supply fan motor power design conditions. greater than 3/4 hp. Equipment Efficienc System Mfg.& Equipment Heating Caoling Tag(s) Model Type No. Rated Rated Minimum Rated Rated Minimum Econ. Capacity Efficiency Efficiency Capacity Efficiency Efficiency Min. Efficiency � N�� ANSI/ASHRAE/IESNA Standard 90.1-2004 6 � � E � � . � .` C� � �" • ; . � ; . �,:� ., Project Name:Paragon Outlets Building 400 Project Address: 3925 Eagan Outlets Parkway Eagan,MN Date: 3/4/2013 HVAC System Designer of Record: JefFrey M.Zunt Telephone: 330-659-6688 Contact Person: Jeffrey M.Zunt Telephone: 330-659-6688 City: EBgen Climate Zone: 6A Zip:b5122 1%Summer DB Temp: 91 F 1%Summer WB Temp: 73 F 99.6%Winter Temp: -16 F Mandato Equipment Efficienc Worksheet 6.4,1.1 System Tag Equipment Type(Tables Size Category(Tables Sub-Category or Rating Units of Efficiency Minimum Efficiency(Tables 6.8.1A th�ough G) 6.8.1A through G) Condition(Tables 6.8.1A (Tables 6.8.1A 6.8.1A through G) through G) through G) Rated >_ Required 1.5 Ton Air Cond.Air Cooled <65,000 BTU Single Package SEER 13.0 >_ 12.0 2 Ton Air Cond.Air Cooled <65,000 BTU Single Package SEER 13.0 >_ 12.0 3 Ton Air Cond.Air Cooled <65,000 BTU Single Package SEER 15.0 >_ 12.0 5 Ton Air Cond.Air Cooled >65,000 <135,000 Single Package SEER 15.0 ? 12.0 6 Ton Air Cond.Air Gooled >65,000 <135,000 Single Package EER 12.6 >_ 10.3 7.5 Ton Air Cond.Air Cooled >65,000 <135,000 Single Package EER 13.0 > 10.3 > Mandato Non-Standard Centrifu al Chiller Worksheet 6.4.1 1 System Tag Leaving CHW Entering CW Condenser Flow Rate Size Category Minimum Efficiency(Tables Temperature(°F} Tempe�ature(°F) (gpm/ton) (Tables 6.8.1H , 6.8.1H through J) through J) Rated >_ Required > > > > General Mandatory Requirements � Piping insulation meets or exceeds the Special Mandatory Requirements requirements of the Standard(§6.4.4.1.3). O Load calculations are provided for selection O Freeze protection or snow/ice melting of all equipment and systems(§6.4.2). � Construction documents require record systems(if any)have controls to prevent ❑ Stair vents,elevator shaft vents,gravity drawings(§6.7.2.1),manuals(§6.7.2.2), operation in wacm weather(§6.4.3.7). system balancing(§67.2.3)and system hoods,gravity vents and gravity ventilations commissioning(§6.7.2.4). o Independent perimeter heating systems(if are provided with motorized dampers. any)cflmply with the control requirements of o Exception:Gravity dampers are used §6.4.3.1.1 and§6.4.32. since the building is less than 3 stories O Independent heating and cooling thermostatic or in climate zones 1-3. controls(if any)are interlocked to prevent o Exception:No vents are required as crossover of set points(§6.4.3.2). these systems ventilate unconditioned zones. H p ANSI/ASHRAE/IESNA Standard 90.1-2004 � �� E m � . • . • " _ � • • . . . • - Project Name: Paragon Outlets Building 400 Contact Person:Jeffrey M.Zunt Telephone: 330-659-6688 S stems Worksheet 6.4 System Tag 1.5 Ton 2 Ton 3 Ton 5 Ton 6 Ton J.5 Ton Supply CFM 600 800 1200 2000 2400 3000 Supply ESP(in.w.c.) 1" 1" 1" 1" 1" 1" Fan System HP 1%8 1/4 1.0 1.0 1.0 3.75 `OA CFM(i.e.Outdoor Air GFM) 50 60 240 400 480 600 Automatic Shutdown(§6.4.3.2.1) C1 C1 C1 C1 C1 C1 Deadband(§6.4.3.1.2) N2 N/A N2 N/A N2 N/A N2 N/A N2 N/A N2 N/A Setback Controls(§6.4.3.2.2) C1 C1 G1 C1 C1 C1 Setup Controls(§6.4.3.2.2) C1 C1 C1 C1 G1 C1 Optimum Start(§6.4.3.1.3) N3 N/A N3 N/A N3 N!A N3 N/A N3 NIA N3 N/A Zone Isolation(§6.4.3.1.4) N3 N/A N3 N/A N3 N/A N3 N/A N3 N/A N3 N/A Shutoff Dampers(§6.4.3.3.3} C2 C2 C2 C2 C2 C2 Heat Pump Aux Heat(§8.4.3.4) N1 N/A N1 N/A N1 N/A N1 N/A N1 N/A N? N/A Humidifier Preheat(§6.4.3.5) N1 N/A N1 N/A N1 N/A N1 N/A N1 N/A N1 N/A Humidification/Dehumidification Deadband(§6.4.3.6) N1 N/A N1 N/A N1 N/A N1 N/A N1 N/A N1 N/A Ventilation Control{§6.4.3.8) N/A N/A NiA N/A N/A N/A Duct/Plenum Insulation(§6.4.4.2.1} C1 C1 C1 C1 C1 C1 Duct Sealing Levels(§6.4.4.2.1)Supply/Return A A A A A A Duct Leakage Test(§6.4.4.2.2) Y Y Y Y Y Y In the tabie above,enter the appropriate codes Setup Controls Heat Pump Aux Heat from this lisf: . C1 Setup provided(up to 90F) • C9 Complying controls provided Shutdown • N1 N/A continuous operation • N1 N/A system is not a heat pump C 1 Complying nonresidential fime switch ' N2 N/A s15 kbtu/h or�3/4 hp • N2 N/A auxiliary is not electric or is not • with override • N3 N/A 9%Sum DB<=100F provided • C2 Complying residential time switch with • N4 N/A no cooling • N3 N/,4 heat pump covered by NAECA override Optimum Start Humidifier Preheat • N1 N/A continuous operation . Cl Optimum start provided • Cl Complying contro/s provided • N2 N/A_<15 kbtu/h or Ci/4 hp . N9 N/A continuous operation • N9 N/A no humidifier • N3 N/A hotel/motel guestroom . N2 N/A�'15 kbtu/h or Q/4 hp • N3 N/A su 1 <-1q000 cfm Humidification/Dehumidification Dead Band Dead Band pp y . C1 Comptyfng,controls provided • C1 Dual setpoint control Shutoff Dampers • N9 N/A no humidification and/or • C2 Manual change over control . C1 Motorized shutoff dampers on OA and dehumidification • N1 N/A special occupancy(requires Exh approva!) � Duct/Plenum Insulation C2 Gravity shutoff dampers on OA and Exh • N2 N/A heating or cooling only . Nl N/A continuous operation • C9 Complying insula6on provided N2 N/A_<15 kbtu/h or Ci/4 h • N1 N/A all ducts located in conditioned Setback Controls � p space • C1 Setback provided(down to 55F) • N3 N/A OA/EA<=300 cfm • N1 N/,4 continuous operation Zone Isolation Duct Sealing • N2 N/A_<15 kbtu/h or Ci/4 hp . C1 Isolation zones provided • Enter highest seal level(A,8 or C)for • N3 N/A 99.6%Win DB>40F . N1 N/A contin�ous operation supply and retum • N4 N/A radiant heating . N2 N/A_<15 kbtu/h or Gi/4 hp Duct Leakage Test • N5 N/A no heating • N3 N/A a/I zones on same schedule • Y Ducts will be tested for leakage • N4 N/A OA/EA<=5,000 cfm • N Ducts will not be tested for leakage h�p 0 ANSI/ASHRAE/IESNA Standard 90.1-2004 � �' E � � . � . � � � � . . - Project Name: Paragon Outlets Building 400 Contact Person: Jeffrey M.Zunt Telephone: 330-659-6688 Prescriptive Checklist heat addition and loop heat rejection(if any) Prescriptive Economizers(§6.5.1) Specify economizer exemptions: comply with the requiremenfs of§6.5.2.2.3. m Systems employ airside economizers ❑ System pumps greater than 10 hp employ (§6.5.1.1). variable flow controls(§6.5.4.1),pump � Economizer provides up to 100%design isolation(§6.5.4.2)and temperature reset airFlow in outdoor air(§6.5,1.1.1). Prescriptive Air-System Requirements (§6.5.4.3). � Economizer is integrated with the mechanical O Simuftaneous Heating and Cooling Prescriptive Special System Requirements cooling system(§6.5.1.1.2 and§6.5.1.3). (§6.5.2.3). ❑ All heat rejection equipment with motors>_7.5 m Economizer high limit shutoff complies with � Zone minimums were set to meet the hp employ controls that comply with§6.5.5. §6.5.1.1.3. requirements of Standard 62. o Exhaust Air Energy Recovery:all fan systems � Economizer dampers meet or exceed ❑ Zone minimums were set to 50.4 cfm/ft2 of that have both a design supply capacity of>_ leakage requirements(§6.5.1.1.4). zone conditioned floor area. 5,000 cfm and a minimum outdoor air supply o ❑ Zone minimums are less than 300 cfm. of>_70%of the design suppiy air employ an � System provides relief for up to 100/o design energy recovery system that complies with airflow in outdoor air(§6.5.1.1.5). ❑ Other(requires special documentation and §6.5.6.1. m Economizer complies with the heating system approval). ❑ Heat recovery for service water heating is impact requirements(§6.5.1.4). ❑ Humidity controls(if any)comply with the provided for facilities that operate o Systems employ waterside economizers. requirements of§6.5.2.3. continuously,have a total water-cooled heat rejection capacity exceeding 6,000,000 bfu/h, ❑ Economizer can provide 100%of the load at � Systems that employ hydronic cooling and and have a design service water heating load either the outdoor conditions of 50°F db/45°F have humidification(if any)use a waterside exceeding 1,000,000 btu/h.The heat wb or 45°F tlb/40°F wb where required for economizer that complies with§6.5.1. recovery system(if any)complies with dehumidification purposes(§6.5.1.2.1). O Variable air volume fan controls comply with §6.5.6.2. ❑ Precooling coils and heat exchangers have the requirements of§6.5.3.2. ❑ Kitchen hoods with exhaust flows>5000 cfm either a<_15 ft of WC pressure drop or are comply with the requirements of§6.5.7.1. Prescriptive WaterSystem Requirements bypassed when economizer is not in use(§ o Fume hoods with a total exhaust s stem flow 6.5.1.2.2}. O Three-pipe systems are not used(§ >15,000 cfm comply with the requ�ements of 0 Economizer is integ[ated with the mechanical 6.5.2.2.1). §6.5.7.2. cooling system(§6.5.1.3). o Two-pipe changeover heating/cooling ❑ Radiant heaters complying with§6.5.8.1 are systems(if any)comply with the m Economizer complies with the heating system requirements of§6.5.2.2.2. used to heat unenclosed spaces(if any). impact requirements{§6.5.1.4). o Hydronic(ground-or water-loop)heat pump � The cooling equipment with hot-gas bypass o Systems are exempt from the economizer controls(if any)meets the unloading re uirements. systems that have equipment for both loop q requirements of§6.5.9. y�N 9 ANSI/ASHRAE/IESNA Standard 90.1-2004 � �°"� � � ��° . � ., � _ �� - - . . . . .- Project Name: Paragon Outlets Building 400 Contact Person: Jeffrey M. Zunt Telephone: 330-659-66$8 Complete one worksheet for each fan system > 5hp Prescriptive Fan Power Limitations 6.5.3.1 Supply Fan Return Fan Exhaust Fan Series-Style Fan-Powered Total System Box Motor(hp) Tag Supply CFM Motor(hp) Tag Motor(hp} Tag Motor(hp) Tag Motor(hp) F-Total Supply CFM Total System Motor HP--� Table 6. . . e hp/cfrn Total SuppIyCFM X cfm Constant + 1,000 � HP Allowance = hp(=Value X CFM/1000) z Credits and/or adjustments'-� Adjusted HP Allowance" hp(see§6.5.3.1) z 'Attach calculations and documentation if credits or temperature adjustments are used.Refer to§6.5.3.1 for the formulas Credits and adjustments are available for the following: • Clean frlter pressure drops in excess of 9 in.w.c.; ` • Pressure drop due to heat recovery coiis or devices or evaporative cooling equipment or devices; • Re/ief fans that operate during peak cooling due to high Gentilation rates;and • Room fo cooling air supply temperature differences that are greater than 20°F(e.g.low temperature supply). ��'P 0 ANSIlASHRAE/IESNA Standard 90.1-2004 � � E m � ' • ' • � • • • � � • � ■ Project Name; Paragon Outlets Building 400 Project Address:3925 Eagan Outlets Parkway Eagan, MN Date: 3/4/2013 City: Eagen Zip: 55122 HVAC System Designer of Record:Jeffrey M.Zunt Telephone: 330-659-6688 Contact Person: Jeffrey M.Zunt Telephone: 330-659-6688 QU111fIC8tiOn � Exception:An energy recovery D (j}Piping is insulated in accordance with ventilation system is provided in Table 6.8.3.Insulation exposed to weather is ❑ The building is 2 stories or less in height and accordance with the requirements in suitable for outdoor service.Cellular foam has a gross floor area is less than 25,000 ft2. §6.5.6, insulation is protected from water and solar radiation. Requirements ❑ (f)The system shall be controlled by a manual changeover or dual setpoint ❑ Exception:Piping is located within ❑ (a)All systems serve a single HVAC zone. thermostat. manufactured HVAC units. O (b)Cooling(if any)is provided by a unitary ❑ (g)Heat pumps equipped with auxiliary ❑ (k)Ductwork and plenums are insulated in packaged or split-system air conditioner that intemal electric resistance heaters(if any) acco�dance with Tables 6.8.2A and 6.8.2B is either air-cooled or evaporati�ely cooled have controls to prevent supplemental heater and sealed in accordance with Tables and meets the e�ciency requirements shown opetation when the heating load can be met 6.4.4.2A and 6.4.42B. in Table 6.8.1.List equipment in the table by the heat pump alone. below. ❑ (I)Construction documents require air o (h)The system controls do not permit reheat systems to be balanced in accordance with ❑ (c)The system has an air economizer as or any other form of simultaneous heating industry-accepted procedures to within 10% required by Table 6.5.1,with controls as and cooling for humidity controL of design airflow rates. required in Tables 6.5.1.1:3A and 6.5.1.1.3B. The economizer has either barometric or ❑ {i)Systems are provided with a time switch o (m)Where separate heating and cooling powered relief sized#o prevent that{1)can start and stop the system under equipment serve the same temperature zone, overpressurization of the building.Outdoor air different schedules for seven different day- thermostats are interlocked to prevent dampers for the'economizer use are provided tYpes per week;(2)is capable of retaining simultaneous heating and cooling. with blade and jamb seals. programming and time setting during a loss of power for a period of at least 10 h;(3) o (n)Exhausts are equipped with gravity or o Exception:The cooling efficiency meets includes an accessible manual override that motorized dampers that will automaticaliy or exceeds the efficiency requirement in allows tempocary operation of the system for shut when systems are not in use. Table 6.3.2.Document in table below. up to 2 h;(4)`is capable of temperature setback down to 55°F during off hours;and O Exception:Design capacity is less than ❑ (d)Heating(if any)shall be provided by a (5)is capabie of temperature setup to 90°F 300 cfm. unitary packaged or split-system heat pump, during off hours. ❑ Exception:System operates a fuel-fired fumace,an electric resistance heater or a baseboard system connected to a ❑ Exception:System serves hotel/motel continuously. boiler.Ali heating equipment meetsthe guest rooms. o (o)Systems have optimum start controls. efficiency requirements of the Standard.List ❑ Exception:System operates equipment in table below. continuously. ❑ Exception:Supply air capacity is less ❑ e The outdoor air uanti than 10,000 cfm. ( ) q ty is less than or ❑ Exception: System has both a cooling equal to 3,000 cfm and less than or 70%of orheating capacity less than 15,000 the supply air quantity at minimum outdoor air Btu/h and a supply fan motor power design conditions. greater than 3/4 hp. E uipment Efficienc System Mfg.& Equipment Heating Cooling Tag(s) Model Type Na Rated Rated Minimum Rated Rated Minimum Econ. Capacity Efficiency E�ciency Capacity Efficiency Efficiency Min. Efficiency ��9 0 ANSI/ASHRAE/IESNA Standard 90.1-2004 � � � � ' � . • • ;'. � . � •' • . .:� � . , Project Name:Paragon Outlets Buiiding 400 Project Address: 3925 Eagan Outlets Parkway Eagan,MN Date: 3/4/2013 HVAC System Designer of Record: Jeffrey M.Zunt Telephone: 330-659-6688 Contact Person: Jeffrey M.Zunt Telephone: 330-659-6688 City: Eagen Climate Zone: 6A Zip:55122 1%o Summer DB Temp: 91 F 1%Summer WB Temp: 73 F 99.6%Winter Temp: -16 F Mandato Equipment Efficienc Worksheet 6.4.1.1 System Tag Equipment Type(Tables Size Category(Tables Sub-Cafegory or Rating Units of Efficiency Minimum Efficiency(Tables 6.8.1A through G) 6.8.1A through G) Condition(Tables 6.8.1A (Tables 6.8.1A 6.8.1A through G) through G) through G) Rated ? Required 8.5 Ton Air Cond.Air Cooled >65,000 <135,000 Single Package EER 13.0 >_ 10.3 10 Ton Air Cond.Air Cooled >65,000 <135,000 Single Package EER 12.5 >_ 10.3 15 Ton Air Cond.A�r Cooled >135,000 <180,000 Single Package EER 12.0 >_ 9,7 > > > > Mandato Non-Standard Centrifu al Chiller Worksheet 6.4.1.1 System Tag Leaving CHW Entering CW Condenser Flow Rate Size Category Minimum Efficiency(Tables Temperatu�e(°F) Temperature(°F) (gpm/ton) (Tables 6.8.1 H 6.8.1 H through J) through J} Rated ? Required > > > > General Mandatory Requirements � Piping insulation meets or exceeds the Special Mandatory Requirements ❑ Load calculations are rovided for selection requirements of the Standard(§6.4.4.1.3). p ❑ Freeze protection or snow/ice melting of all equipment and systems(§6.4.2). ca Construction documents require record systems(if any)have controls to prevent ❑ Stair vents,elevator shaft vents,gravity drawings(§6J.2.1),manuals(§6.7.2.2), operation in warm weather(§6.4:3.7). system balancing(§6.7.2.3)and system hoods,gravity vents and gravity ventilations commissioning(§6.7.2.4). ❑ Independent perimeter heating systems{if are provided with motorized dampers. any)comply with the control requirements of ❑ Exception:Gravity dampers are used §6.4.3.1.1 and§6.4.3.2. since the building is less than 3 stories ❑ Independent heating and cooling thermostatic or in climate zones 1-3. controis(if any)are interlocked to prevent o Exception:No vents are required as crossover of set points(§6.4.3.2). these systems ventilate unconditioned zones. H p �0 ANSI/ASHRAE/IESNA Standard 90.1-2004 � °E"� , � � , • . y • •, ' • °, . , � � _ Project Name: Paragon Outlets Builtling 400 Contact Person:Jeffrey M.Zunt Telephone: 330.659-6688 S stems Worksheet 6.4 System Tag 8.5 Ton 10 Ton 15 Ton Supply CFM 3800 4000 6000 Supply ESP(in.w.c.) 1" 1" 1" Fan System HP 3.75 3.75 3.0 OA CFM(i.e.Outdoor Air CFM) 760 800 1200 Automatic Shutdown(§6.4.3.2.1) C1 C1 C1 Deadband(§6.4.3.1.2) N2 N/A N2 N/A N2 N/A Setback Controls(§6.4.3.2.2) C1 C1 C1 Setup Controls(§6.4.3.2.2) C1 C1 C1 Optimum Start(§6.4.3.1.3) N3 N/A N3 N/A N3 N/A Zone Isolation(§6.4.3.1.4) N3 N/A N3 N/A N3 N/A Shutoff Dampers(§6.4.3.3.3) C2 C2 G2 Heat Pump Aux Heat(§6.4.3.4) N 1 N/A N 1 N/A N1 N/A Humidifier Preheat(§6.4.3.5) N1 N/A N1 N/A N1 N/A Humidification/Dehumidification Deadband(§6.4.3.6) N1 N/A N1 N/A N1 N/A Ventilation Control(§6.4.3.8) N/A N/A N/A Duct/Plenum Insulation(§6.4.4.2.1) C1 C1 C1 Duct Sealing Levels(§6.4.4.2.1)Supply/Return A A A A A A Duct Leakage Test(§6.4.4.2.2) Y Y Y Y Y Y In the table above,enter the appropriate codes Setup Controls Heat Pump Aux Heat from this list: • C1 Setup provided(up to 90F) • G1 Complying controls provided Shutdown • N1 N/A continuous operation . N1 N/A system is not a heat pump • C1 Complying nonresidential time switch ' N2 N/A�95 kbtu/h or Q/4 hp • N2 N/A auxiliary is not electric or is not with override • N3 N/A 1%Sum DB<=100F provided . C2 Complying residential time switch with ' N4 N/A no cooling • N3 N/A heat pump covered by NAECA over�ide Optimum Start Humidifier Preheat • N1 N/A continuous operation . C1 Optimum start provided • C1 Complying controls provided • N2 N/A S15 kbtu/h or C3/4 hp . N1 N/A continuous operation • N1 N/A no humidifier • N3 N/A hotel/mote!guestroom . N2 N/A s'15 kbtu/h or Q/4 hp N3 N/A su I <-10,000 cfm HumidificationlDehumidification Dead Band Dead Band ' pPy . C1 CompJying confro/s pcovided • C1 Dual setpoint control Shutoff Dampers • N1 N/A no humidification and/or • C2 Manual change over cont�ol . C1 Moforized shutoff dampers on OA and dehumidification • N1 N/A speclal occupancy(requires Exh approval) . C2 Grav�ty shutoff dampers on OA and Exh Duct/Plenum Insulation • N2 N/A heating or cooling on/y . N1 N/A continuous operation • G1 Complying insulation provided N2 N/A_<15 kbtu/h or G3/4 h • N1 N/A all ducts located in conditioned Setback Controls ' p space • C1 Setback provided(down to 55F) • N3 N/A OA/EA<=300 cfm • N1 N/A continuous operation Zone Isolation Duct Sealing • N2 N/A_<15 kbfu/h or_Q/4 hp � • Enter highest seal level(A,8 or C)for C1/solation zones provided • N3 N/A 99.6%Win DB>40F � supply and return N1 N/A continuous operation • N4 N/A radiant heating . N2 N/A_<15 kbtu/h or G3/4 hp Duct Leakage Test • N5 N/A no heating • N3 N/A al!zones on same schedule • Y Ducts will be tested for leakage • N4 N/A OA/EA<=5,000 cfm • N Ducts will not be tested for feakage H p 0 ANSI/ASHRAE/IESNA Standard 90.1-2004 � d�m � � � � � � ' ' . • - Project Name: Paragon Outlets Building 400 Contact Person: Jeffrey M.Zunt Telephone: 330-659-6688 Prescriptive Checklist heat addition and loop heat rejection(if any) Prescriptive Economizers(§6.5.1) Specify economizer exemptions: comply with the requirements of§6.5.2.2.3. m Systems employ airside economizers O System pumps greater than 10 hp employ (§6.5.1.1). variable flow controls(§6.5.4.1),pump � Economizer provides up to 100%design isofation(§6.5.4.2}and temperature reset airflow in outdoor air(§6.5.1.1.1). Prescriptive AirSystem Requirements (§6.5.4.3). � Economizer is integrated with#he mechanical O Simultaneous Heating and Cooling Prescriptive Special System Requirements cooling system(§6.5.1.1.2 and§6.5.1.3). (§6.5.2.3). O All heat rejection equipment with motors?7.5 � Economizer high limit shutoff complies with � Zone minimums were set to meet the hp employ controls that comply with§6.5.5. §6.5.1.1.3. requirements of Standard 62. ❑ Exhaust Air Energy Recovery:'atl fan systems � Economizer dampers meet or exceed ❑ Zone minimums were set to 50.4 cfm/ft2 of that have both a design supply capacity of>_ leakage requirements(§6.5.1.1.4). zone conditioned floor area. 5,000 cfm and a minimum outdoor air supply a ❑ Zone minimums are less than 300 cfm. of>_70%of the design supply air employ an � System provides relief for up to 100/o design energy recovery system that complies with airflow in outdoor air(§6.5.1.1.5). ❑ Other(requires special documentation and §6.5.6.1. � Economizer complies with the heating system approval). o Heat recovery for service water heating is impact requirements(§6.5.1.4). ❑ Humidity controls(if any)comply with the provided for facilities that operate o Systems employ waterside economizers. requirements of§6.5.2.3. confinuously,have a total water-cooled heat rejection capacity exceeding 6,000,000 btulh, ❑ Economizer can provide 100%of the load at O Systems that empioy hydronic cooling and and haye a design service wafer heating load either the outdoor conditions of 50°F db/45°F have humidification(if any)use a waterside exceeding 1,000,000 btu/h.The heat wb or 45°F db/40°F wb where re uired for economizer that complies with 6.5.1. q § recovery system(if any)complies with dehumidification purposes(§6.5.1.2.1). o Variable air volume fan controls comply with §6.5.6.2. ❑ Precooling coils and heat exchangers have the requirements of§6.5.3.2. ❑ Kitchen hoods with exhaust flows>5000 cfm eithe�a 5 15 ft of 1NC pressute drop or are compiy with the�equirements of§6.5.7.1. Prescriptive Water-System Requirements bypassed when economizer is not in use(§ o Fume hoods with a total exhaust system flow 6.5.1.2.2}. ❑ Three-pipe systems are not used(§ >15,000 cfm comply with the requirements of 0 Economizer is integratetl with the mechanical 6.5.2.2.1). §6.5.7.2. cooling system(§'6.5.1.3). o Two-pipe changeover heating/cooling o Radiant heaters complying with§6.5.8.1 are systems(if any)comply with the m Economizer complies with the heating system requi�ements of§6.5.2.2.2. used to heat unenclosed spaces(if any). impact requirements(§6.5.1.4). ❑ The cooling equipment with hot-gas bypass o Hydronic(ground-or water-loop)heat pump o Systems are exempt from the economizer systems that have equipment for both loop controls(if any)meets the unloading requirements. requirements of§6.5.9. h�p a ANSI/ASHRAE/IESNA Standartl 90.1-2004 � d E � � �. �, � � �� , � � � � • •� � . . r Pro�ect tvame: Paragon Outiets Building 400 Contact Person: Jeffrey M. Zunt Telephone: 330-659-6688 Complete one worksheet for each fan system >5hp Prescriptive Fan Power Limitations 6.5.3.1 Suppiy Fan Return Fan Exhaust Fan Series-Style Fan-Powered Total System ' Box Motor(hp) Tag Supply CFM Motor(hp) 7ag Motor(hp) Tag Motor(hp) Tag Motor(hp) FTotal Supply CFM Total System Motor HP-� Table 6. . . e hp/cfm Total Supply CFM X cfm Constant + 1,000 �� HP Allowance = hp(=Value X CFM/1000) ? Credits and/or adjustments"� Adjusted HP Allowance* hp(see§6.5.3.1) >_ *Attach calculations and documentation if credits or temperature adjustments are used.Refer to§6.5.3.1 for the formulas Credits and adjustments are available for the following: • Clean filter pressure drops in excess of 9 in.w.c.; • Pressure drop due to heat reco�ery coils or devices or evaporative cooling equipment or devices; • Relief fans fhat operate during peak cooling due to high ventilation rafes;and • Room to cooling air supply temperature differences that are greater than 20°F(e.g.low temperature supply). h�p 0 ANSI/ASHRAE/IESNA Standard 90.1-2004 � � E � BUILDING 400 •° �, • �; .� .i . = i � _ . , � . . . . Pro�ect Name: PARAGON OUTL'ETS AT CEDAR GROVE Project Address: TB� Date: 3.4.20�3 �esignerofRecord: JEFFREY MITERKO Te�ephone:330.659.6688 Contact Person:GREG SUTYAK Telephone: 330.659.6688 ciry: EAGAN, MINNESOTA Mandatory Provisions Checklist Automatic lighting shutoff controls are provided m Each space enclosed by ceiling-height ❑ Two-lamp tandem-wired ballasts. based on either a scheduling device oFan partitions has an independent,accessible occupant senso�. control that operates general lighting in the � Display lighting has a separate control. ❑ Exception: Space is intended for 24- space. ❑ Case lighting has a separate control. hour operation. ❑ Exception: The controi is located in a � Hotel/motel guest rooms have a master ❑ Exception: Space is smalier than 5,000 remote location for safety or security switch at the main ent ftz reasons. ry. ❑ Exception: Space for patient care. ❑ For spaces less than or equal to 10,000 ft2,a � Taskiighting has a separate control. separate'space control is provided for each ❑ Nonvisual lighting has a separate controL 2;500 ftZ of area ❑ Exception: Space where automatic Z ❑ Demonstration lighting has a separate lighting shutoff would endanger safery or � For spaces more than 10,000 ft,a separate controL space control is provided for each 10,000 ft2 security. of area � Exit signs do not exceed 5 W per face. ❑ Either a photosensor or an astronomical time ❑ Exterior buiiding grounds luminaires;greater switch controls exterior lighting applications. than 100 W have lamps with minimum ❑ Exception: Lights must remain on for efficacy of 60 lumens/W. safety,security or eye adaptation ❑ Exception: Luminaire is activated with a reasons. motion sensor. Interior Li htin Power Allowance Buildin Area Method Building Lighting Power Density Building Area Lighting Power Allowance TYPe (W/ftz) (ftz) (W) Total Inter,ior Li htin Pow;er Allowance S ace-b -Space Method Building Common/Specific Lighting Power Density Space Area Lighting Power Allowance " TYPe Space Type (Wlftz) (ft2) (W) CORRIDOR 0.5 4557 2278:5 ELECT/MECH 1.5 527 79os: RESTROOM 0.9 712 640.8 STORAGE o.s is2 153:6 . Total 3863.4 h�p � � o � ANSI/ASHRAE/IESNA Standard 90.1-2004 E m . . � r • i .ji ' z � � ' + � ' .s - Project Name: PARAGON OUTLETS AT CEDAR GROVE co�tactPerson: GREG SUTYAK -re►ephone: 330:659.6688 Interior Connected Li 'htin Power TYPe ID luminaire Description �� ' � Number of Watts/ Total (including number of lamps per fixture,watts per lamp,type of ��,� m ca', ' Luminaires Luminaire Watts ballast,type of fixture) ��,�" �� ''��,�' � �� m �o� � . . ��`�,', �:U ��'*� . � . �� :�l ��'� � � � �t�6�`r O �;�'� d ��; � . .�C'� ��a .C ��. t . � u. � � �.� � 0 � �� AA HIGH ABUSE,2-32W T8,ELECTRONIC Q`�� Q � Q 38 59 2242 BB 4'INDUSTRIAL,2-32W T8,ELECTRONIC Q��(� ��Q ��Q 9 59 531 F2 DOWNLIGHT,1-32W CFL,ELECTRONIC Q�� Q ��. Q 7 36 252 S 6"RECESSED,2-32W T8 PER 4',ELECTRONIC ��(b �' Q � ;Q 56' 59/4' 826 ��Q �.,��0 ��Q �Q�,��O �,�± {`0 ��0 � � �O_ ��0 � �. � � O�O� ��O � U � � � � � � ��0 ��0 �-� n0 �� C��O, ��Q �'��O � � � Total 3851 Additional Interior Li htin Power Allowance Type Space ID Space Name �'�� °`� Area(ft2) UnitAllowance Allowance Luminaire Installed �� (W/ftz) (W) 1D's Powen(W) �3 �� .� �,. �,>> $� a,�!; �`m�� N �m; �� p �un"i� �� > ��`� �� - O�O �"_; C��O �0�� ; O ��f y� ��:. ��0 �j�`�� 50�0 �1� Q�0 �,�� E� O �� 0 ��_._ h�p 0 ANSI/ASHRAE/IESNA Standard 90.1-2004 �` E � � . .. � �'� ��, �� . �' �; � � �� . �� _ ; .�. Project tvame: PARAGON OUTLETS AT CEDAR GROVE Contact Person: GREC� SU�(AK Te►ephone: 330.659.6688 Additional In#erior Connected Li h#in Power Type ID Luminaire Descri tion � ��"� P �.� �� Numb�r of � Watts/ �� Total (inc(uding number of lamps per fixture,watts per lamp,type ��„� �£¢ co ��,�m� Luminaires Luminaire Wafts of baAast,rype of fixture) �x �,�� YA`t� V �e.r��x N �'�` 7 N tA O ��O rn ;C, � �.�.� � i�s ��. � ��'L� C �". L � �°O � LL ��_� J ,�_; O .��.,? �:�� . . . .�� k�-�� . . . . Oxzs3`O �;,.,r'�O O . ��V�O �s.��O .s+��..�0 � � �?�o �:�.40 �?��o Q�,o �o��o ��o o��o �o�o ��o o��.o �X�o ��o Q��o �o"�o �?�o o'�o g�'�o ��o o��o ��o o�o Total y�p < ANSI/ASHRAE/IESNA Standard 90.1-2004 � � � � Special Structural Testing & Fnspection Program Summary Schedule Project Name Paragon Outlets Cedar Grove Project# 12021 Location 3925 Eagan Outiets Parkway, Eagan, MN Permit# (1) (Building 400) Technical 2 Description (3) Type of Specific Report Assigned Firm (6) Section Article Inspection (4) F.requency(5) 1704.3 Steel Constr. Mat`I Verification SI -S Periodic High Strength Boltin SI -S Periodic Welding SI -S Continuous 1704.4 Conc. Constr. Reinf. Steel SI -S Periodic Anchor Bolts SI -S Continuous Design Mix SI -S Periodic Strength Test SI -S Continuous Placement SI -S Continuous Curing SI -S Periodic Formwork SI -S Periodic 1704.5 Masonry Constr. Jnspection SI -S Periodic Prior to Grout S1 -S Periodic Grout Placement SI -S Continuous Grout/Mortar Pris SI -S Continuous Constr. Doc./Submi al S1 -S Periodic Compliance 1704.7 Soils Subgrade SI -5 Periodic Excavations SI -S Periodic Controlled Fill SI -S Periodic Placement of Fill SI -S Continuous Subgrade Prep. SI -S Periodic Note: This schedule shall be filled out and included in a Special Structural Testing and lnspection Program. (If not otherwise specified, assumed program wiJl be "Guidelines for Special Inspection & Testing" as contained in the State Building Code and as modified by the State adopted IBC. *A complete specification-ready program can be downloaded directly by visiting CASE/MN at www.cecm.orq. 1. Permit number to be provide by the Building Official 2. Referenced to the specific technical scope section in the program 3. Use descriptions per IBC Chapter 17, as adopted by MN 5tate Building Code. 4. Special Inspector-Technical (51T); Special Inspector-Structural (SIS) 5. Weekly, monthly, per test/inspection, per floor, etc. 6. Name of firm contracted to perform services Acknowledgements (Each appropriate representative shall sign below) Owner �� Firm Paragon Outlets Eagan LLC. Date �/z+6/�3 Contractor Firm Ryan Companies US, Inc. Date s=/y-�.3 Architect �� Firm Dal Pos Architects, LLC. Date__��' -�-J-,�� SER � Firm Thorson Baker&Associates Date SI�Y'1�,3 SI-S � Firm Braun Intertec, Inc. Date ✓� l3 >�3 TA � Firm Braun Intertec, Inc. Date `��3 � F ��/!��,�, Firm Linco Companies Date S��-- ��_ If requested by Engineer/Architect of Record or Building Official, the individual names of all prospective Special Inspectors and the work they intend to observe shall be identified as an attachment. Leqend SER =Structural Engineer of Record SI-T=Special Inspector-Technical TA=Testing Agency F= Fabricator SI-S =Special Inspector-Structural Accepted for the Building Division By Date BCSD-PR019 4/03 Special lnspector Finai Report Date: To City or County of: Attention: Street Address City: State: Zip Code: � RE: Final Project Report Project Name: Address: To Whom it May Concern: This is to certify that I performed special inspections on the following portions of the work at the above address which required continuous inspection, and which I was employed to inspecfi Based on my personal observation and written reports of this work, it is my judgment that the inspected work was perFormed, to the best of my knowledge, in accordance with the approved plans, specifications, and the applicable workmanship provisions of the Uniform Buitding Code. Sincerely, Special Inspector's Signature Date Print full name ID Number cc: Client/Owner Architect/Engineer . -, � �. � ��" � � " ��r} � �—'�s�t�� _.��..,_..e....��}� .. +ar=rn ��.�- `� « • �� ' � � ?�- ��, �$}�..�::��. Y"5. � ' . � 1�V•�`� � .y �Y" i� t. �� y+=� .�. '�3.,�S; .*�' � t"�� •y+,� �,�� ,. , ,�' # �Z . . , ; ' . .. . {, £� . q�.' <E,; � . . �° ° ".w� � ` •.� ✓ � .r j : S 1/� .��. ..+�'f 5� +�� } , �� : � �'.'�:< ' °��t�� ;�*;�� ' � . � �` �' ` �' '� �-�- � �� ''C;�` `` ��+��s��w s .; '� � � ' ,— � ' .� �> �-� '�,f � r �.. .�� •��a .�;� ��" ... � s�t� :Z�•• '�c � , ° � �� ` �:.. ��, . ! {„ "",.`. r ` � " � } . z , � ' # 'k4 `� =; �' �,� l ''.�'� �� `�` ;�y r . �P'r� . s 5. �, 1 ,�� '' �` y.�` ..*it',C}�i ` �� . '� �� .,,�� o . � . . , � , r� � i' L,. : .. h!. � . �' . „r rt`' u) 1�`.'y'6 fi �� . `�y .. � .4 �„ t 4" •`� ' �. �\ � j �� 5*.. " �q. � � Fs:'�t f� 'A ��` 'e. g�, � a � "• ,j'.,, � �^ ^�•. m � ��J� y � a�w�l� r , �a ��. Q�� - ��' � � O � �:�/�l�h�'� p � � �. '� � � �y� t ~� � ;•s � � m z� � �`�`�� O N ,,• v „°p .. . �� !; �� t `i � �� Q �t � •' . .. . .. � � ` F' 'r� \ `�`�� r �i. i `�� :'�* ��V�` � 'Y � ` j �; �;:� . - `�� y /� : ,, � /y' �'s �Y s � 4. �y � � ' ' ; ��,_ . < ., � .�� y!::, , �,+,``, �;� ��;... ` . � �.; —�� Y �i1 «�/ �"�, ��'\ •��a;�. i;�, ;��g S� .;� x s''�"' ..'-�. . . T / �� '� r Er � t � _,�/'/[ �,� �ij� � ��y' �%s,a ca s� �� `l�l y t t�5}ff d..' � �1 r�.!� a `- � i % lG � ��r' �� 7 `` r�` 1,�1', �� ' '`�d ��. `� �� 4 " -- � i ! lY � !i X W/ �YA \�� \�� , �q . ;.r' ��va+� S � i f � f k. • `+.fv. � ;k*a � �G �� % � s� `�� ,�� ° 'ti: a t a .@t �' ,�'sF >4r{ ...�� '�� "lT�,.. , 0'�\�' F�ji��\ ��`r��'Yir�L ' � <X 1�.�a rs.y� ��ro.0 � #r��"'�'��xiatt��. .. ,��, i k '�%�+ �l�„_��:C�`� :/�'" � �'�' ��—,. c,`iD� p Y �pt �,� �� . ,� �, a ' a� � ,�� < .'t , �'�a„��' .YC`� ��.✓/� � . ��'� .. � J-.'D �..--.a�"°^ c tt� g. t � � ` � � 4 ...'l} � � -yk °�r v" .!'' N4� '., '�� \'-,�'i6+` � � � ':y �_ �� ;j I i _-��t '�:, ' 1 • i\ � y � i� °� .`-` r -^,.«s .� � '� Zl ` d� � .1 t� 1 ��Y„�a,;;+A... � ��\;1 � '� vVP 5 ..�" .,y �-. �'ac�_. ,r� , . �-.+�`� �- � 't {:r?�� pVj ;��\ �y�� s• � v�� . r� 4� .` . �,�` �, �� 'r'� .w. �s � ;'6. � ' v�G +� �,. \ \ �:p N t � .,- . M1 � . . l,� .,�, � \ � ��',,v7✓,4�' \ �j,.'y�, � � ��aM �• Z�t .I .��F�,� � ��. .� � �. •� . �`�J�`' V, O,� � � � �„ty, �,t.'�11' �. p �.. Qy \ (''") �.. �� . �� . v�� y � t�� +� .4t � '� ��`' 1 ��ya� '� 7d '�,. ,�•S{'.'. � ft�'.:,, �. �.: � fiS ;, r� r +:�`"' :1 .�i�,.,�1?�3�Yr�� \`, �' �,; � �\ ��A�, � ''�`��_�� ` � � � .a ��a . ��-� ti �¢� � �,p �i�,.� � ��, � �,� \% �� ?.\ .�.� i� �:y ��..��- "i�..} �,n.. N� , � i�. 1. ". �r� '-� � i ,_ i . � � �' � , �� .,`��= ��r" 1 • K50p� � �•�„3 ;:i�h ` i� � �• S 1 b x . Q '`� � � �`+�` �+.+��,` .`R {L � \', � . ,i �R� C7 LF' � � � ,� j`� � M \'� �` � a � �� , _ �\ ti�� `1, `. � k �t ''� y�' ��`'� m � � � � � C� \•� , C�p 1� �t�'��P % 1� � ' •� �` cco �C" � O� i� �� . N `\, � � �y, , ` ` ` . 1 4y ;wi�.'� �... i�'A �'ii, ,/$� j�N . y � ��..,. .�.. �� ,'7' � R d' �s �r �� ,� g �.�� g, \7•�N � � �L et � �! . � .��'`�v'�lls�.•a'r"�r '� �'� fii �N iY 5. �+, �' ` . .�� ` a • �-..�� . N ,��,� .�� Q� . � � _ � ��M1 f .. • � ' � .'O Q ` �. . L. , \\ * t Y � f,�� 4�4' ° � � � . \\ .��, i� M J1k �il� l�j� •�y Q O �'s+e � C>F iy� �. \ ,ti, .�;� �� ' � � ' � � .� ;l c �"�",r, '� � ,��, �� -'��-' � �. . �� -�� \� ,� �,�� ,� :`, o �� c� �.fi,�`��```;�4s� �.w��r� �A+, � � � � �� —_—_ -___._..___. �,f_ � ,wt � � � , �#, � � r � ��a�: -s 'a _ � � , �p a c :j�fi � . . n . � \V p � L ��'h � ., � �, � � ��`E.C� � ` ' '�a .. - �S , ._- � �F� VJ � � -�.„ ., . ��..<. , � ciR :�... . .� ,i�+ ' ��`'° _. � ' � � � � <:R�., f � .ry ,��_ t y k a ' . .. .. F 5 �� O � � � < � . , � f � �'�z . .. ,-- O �� '. �>� �"�" � , � �� ` . ; � _ � �� 4,�� « 4 � ,i L � � `i� ` � � . � � ;- � - " � i ° � y' � . Ri �f � � . va Y A Structural Steel Speciai inspection Final Report Cedar Grove Outlet Mall—Building 400 3905 Eagan Outlets Parkway Eagan, Minnesota Prepared for Paragon Outlets Eagan LLC Project BL-12-04579A July 31, 2014 Braun Intertec Corporation � ' Braun Intertec Corporarion Phone:952•995•2000 . iiooi Hampshire Ave S Fax: 952•995•2020 Minneapolis,MN 55438 Web: braunintertec.com July 31, 2014 Project B1-12-04579A Mr. Steven Trainer Paragon Outlets Eagan LLC 217 E Redwood Street, 21st Floor Baltimore, MD 21202 Re: Structural Steel Special Inspection Procedural and Final Report Cedar Grove Outlet Mall—Building 400 3905 Eagan Outlets Parkway Eagan, Minnesota Dear Mr.Trainer: Please find attached to this procedural report the Structural Steel Special Inspection Final Report for the Cedar Grove Outlet Mall Building 400 Project and the supporting Special Inspection Daily Reports. Special Inspection and Testing Procedures The special inspection services were periodically provided by International Code Council (ICC) certified special inspectors in accordance with the requirements of the Minnesota State Building Code, Chapter 17 of the International Building Code (IBC) and the project plans and specifications. The purpose of special inspections is to provide a review of the contractor's work designated by the project structural engineer as needing special inspection under the guidelines of the IBC to determine compliance with the approved construction documents. The special inspector does not have the responsibility or authority to, nor is it the intent of special inspections to have them,judge or modify the construction documents. Only the structural engineer of record can do this. As the special inspections were completed, a Special Inspection Daily Report was prepared to summarize the results of our inspections and testing. A copy of this report was provided to the contractor's site representative for their review and records. As part of this report, items needing correction or discrepancies observed from the approved construction documents were noted. We also summarized the discrepancies documented in a Discrepancy Log. As needed, we also contacted the project structural engineer for additional clarification on specific issues related to the drawings or discrepancies observed. Pians ar�d Specifications The plans and project documents available at the site were used for our inspections. From time to time, we received plan modifications from the structural engineer. When received, these were used to evaluate the work completed in the field. Visual Examination of the Field-Made Welds Visual examination of the field welds was conducted in accordance with American Welding Society (AWS) D1.1-2010, Figure 5.4 and Table 6.1 requirements and the requirements of the project plans and specifications. AA/EOE Prouiding engineering and environmental solutions since i957 - Paragon Outlets Eagan LLC Project BL-12-04579A July 31, 2014 Page 2 Tension-Control Bolted Connection Observations Tension-control bolted connection observations were conducted to determine if the bolt holes were filled, if the correct bolts were used, if the nuts were fully engaged and if the splined end of the tension- control bolts had separated from the body of the bolt. Removal of the splined end is a direct indicator the bolt has been torqued to the minimum snap-off load. At connections where the splined ends were not, or could not be removed,the torque applied to the bolt by the contractor was determined using a hand-held torque wrench. In addition,each connection was observed for fit-up and to determine if the variousplies were in contact with one another. Metal Deck Weld and Fastener Observations Metal deck weld observations were conducted in general accordance with AWS D1.3-2008, Section 6.0 requirements and the requirements of the project plans and specifications. Items reviewed included the quality, size and spacing of the welds. In addition,the location and the completeness of the side-lap fastener installation were observed and evaluated. Column Anchor Bolt Observations The column anchor bolts were observed to determine if they were in place, and if the nuts were installed, fully engaged and snug tight. The base plates were observed to determine if they were in full contact with the adjoining surface. If required bythe construction documents,we also observed if the plate washers were installed. Cold Form Metal-Framing Mechanical Fasteners Visual observations were conducted to determine if the mechanical fasteners used in the cold form metal-framing construction were placed in conformance with the requirements of the structural details, plans and specifications. � �� • Paragon Outlets Eagan LLC Project BL-12-04579A July 31, 2014 Page 3 General In performing its services, Braun Intertec used that level of care and skill ordinarily exercised by reputable members of its profession currently practicing in the same locality. No warranty, express or implied, is made. Thank you for the opportunity to provide the special inspection and testing services for this project. After review of the attached Special Inspection Final Report, if you have any questions or require additional information, please call Dan Graham at 952.995.2524 or Marv Denne at 952.995.2510. Sincerely, BRAUN INTERTEC CORPORATION - ��/�G�.'��?�� `�' �L�� ,'� Daniel P. Grabam ICC Certified Special Inspector-Structural Steel and Welding r�Cj� `�� ristopher R. Kehl, PE Principal-Senior Engineer Attachment: Structural Steel Special Inspection Final Report c: Jeff Graham, PE;Thorson Baker&Associates, Inc. Mark Kronbeck; Alliant Engineering, Inc. lames Miller; Dalpos Architects& Integrators Craig Novaczyk; City of Eagan Michael Thorson, PE;Thorson Baker&Associates, Inc. Brad McCarter, PE; Braun Intertec �� ' Braun Intertec Corporation Phone:952•995•2000 . riooi Hampshire Ave S F�: 952•995•2020 Minneapolis,MN 55438 Web: braunintertec.com Structural Steel Special Inspection Final Report City of: Eagan Date: July 31, 2014 Attention: Mr.Steven Trainer Project: Cedar Grove Outlet Mall—Building 400 3905 Eagan Outlets Parkway Eagan, Minnesota Braun Intertec Project: BL-12-04579A In accordance with the Minnesota State Building Code, Section 1704 of the International Building Code and the agreed-upon scope of services,the required special inspections and testing have been provided for the following items: Bolting. The bolted connections detailed in the attached Special Inspection Daily Reports were observed in general accordance with the requirements of the plans and specifications.There are currently no outstanding or unresolved bolted connection-related issues. Structural Field Welding. The welded connections detailed in the attached Special Inspection Daily Reports were observed in general accordance with the requirements of the project plans and specifications. Discrepancies were noted and documented. These connections were found to be acceptable following the required corrections or review with the structural engineer. There are � currently no outstanding or unresolved structural welding-related issues. Metal Deck Welding and Fasteners. The metal deck welding and side-lap fasteners detailed in the attached Special Inspection Daily Reports were observed in general accordance with the requirements of the project plans and specifications.There are currently no outstanding or unresolved decking- related issues. Mechanical Fasteners. The mechanical fasteners detailed in the attached Special Inspection Daily Reports were observed in general accordance with the requirements of the plans and specifications. There are currently no outstanding or unresolved mechanical fastener-related issues. AA/EOE Prouiding engineering and environmental solutions since 1957 • Paragon Outlets Eagan LLC Project BL-12-04579A luly 31, 2014 Page 2 Conclusion Based upon the inspections conducted,the testing performed and the attached reports, it is our professional judgment that,to the best of our knowledge,the inspected work was performed and completed in accordance with the approved plans, specifications, structural-engineer-provided modi�cations and applicable workmanship provisions of the Minnesota State Building Code and the International Building Code. Inspecting Firm: Braun Intertec Corporation I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that l am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under th laws of the State of Minnesota. `y��it��;`��,��✓r� ,� •�es.«w�sP V s"- � �� Y ��pe e�e°� �r' . . . ro'w�° • *"" � 3?`• '��R•°a[��. � . �� e��''t's^�'N:»:!� . . . Christopher R. Kehl, PE ��; ��i"�� ,� Principal-Senior Engineer `:`a �°�'�-�� °�4��'� ,� .� �� ;, License Number: 43459 :�;� .�, �� : JUIy 31, 2014 ' "'�a�°''`�� 4�`�k ` - .. s �, Attachments: Special Inspection Daily Reports 1 through 13 Summary of Discrepancy Log �� y � � } (ssue Date: 2013l01/01 Rev No.: 0 s Special inspection Daily Report City of Eagan, MN. Page 1 of 1 Report No.: Structural Steel#1 Date of this Report: 9-09-13 Project Name: Building 400 Project No.: BL-12-04579A Project Address: 3905 Eagan Outlets Parkway Ciient: Paragon Outlets Eagan Client Project No.: Weather: Sunny PM Brad McCarter Temperature: 92 ° F Type of Inspection: Inspection Coverage: ❑ Continuous ❑ Masonry ❑ Rebar Placement ❑ Foundations ❑ Special Cases: � Periodic �Welding &Bolting ❑ Concrete ❑ Fireproofing ❑ Piles&Piers ❑Tendon Placement ❑ Soils Did the architect or engineer authorize changes to City-approved plans? ❑Yes (Listed Below) ❑ No Description and location af work completed: - - -- ---..- -- _ _ --- --- ----- . __ _ Visual weld observations were perFormed in accordance with AWS D1.1 Section 6 2010 criteria on the foAowing: 1) Bar joist fillet welds Roof Level Grid G-J 34-39 per Nucor Vulcraft details. No discrepancy noted 2) Anchor botts at Foundation Level Grid G-J 34-39 plies in direct contact with full nut engagement present. 3) Truss girder fillet welds at Roof Level Grid G-J 34-39 per Nucor Vulcraft details. No discrepancy noted _ - ----___ __-_ _ -- -_ _ _ _._--._ ___---____ __ _ List tests performed: _ __ __. __._ _ ___ __._. __ ----__ _. ____ ._ ______ _ Visual --_ ------ __ .-----___ _---- ---___ _.--___ ___----- ----_____.___ ___.._____ _ _--_ _----- -__- - -- ■ Are there any discrepancies noted from this day's observations? Yes ❑ No � ■ Are there any outstanding discrepancies on this project? Yes ❑ No � o If yes, see attached Summary Sheet. • Repart given to Contractor: Yes � No ❑ To the best of our knowledge,work inspected was done in accordance with the appraved plans, spec�cations, and applicable workmanship provisions of the current IBC, except as noted above. 5igned: Date: 9-09-13 Print Full Name: Daniel P. Graham I.D. No.: 1054095 S18�S2 Issue Date: 2013/01/01 Rev Plo.: 0 • a +u d, � $�4 Special Inspection Daily Report City of Eagan, MN. Page 1 of 1 Report No.: Structurai Steel#2 Date of this Report: 9-11-13 Project Name: Buiiding 400 Project No.: BL-12-04579A Project Address: 3905 Eagan Outlets Parkway Client: Paragon Outlets Eagan Client Project No.: Weather: Sunny PM Brad McCarter Temperature: 86 ° F Type of lnspection: Inspection Coverage: ❑ Continuous ❑ Masonry ❑ Rebar Placement ❑ Foundatinns ❑ Special Cases: � Periodic �Welding & Bolting ❑ Concrete ❑ Fireproofing ❑ Piles &Piers ❑Tendon Placement ❑ Soils Did the architect or engineer authorize changes to City-approved plans? ❑Yes (Listed Below) ❑ No Description and location of work completed: _.__._ _ _ _ __ __.. _ . . . _ __ _ _. _ Visual weld observations were performed in accordance with AWS D1.1 Section 6 201Q criteria on the following: 1) Bar joist fillet welds Roof Level Grid GJ 32-34 per Nucor Vulcraft details. No discrepancy noted 2} Anchor bolts at Foundation Level Grid G-J 32-34 plies in direct contact with full nut engagement present. 3) Truss girder fillet welds at Roof Level Grid G-J 32-34 per Nucor Vulcraft details. No discrepancy noted _ ___ _ _ _ . _ ___ _.. _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ List tests performed: _ ___ __ . _ __ __ . . . Visual _ __ __ ___ __ ___ __ __ __ • Are there any discrepancies noted from this day's observations? Yes ❑ No � ■ Are there any outstanding discrepancies on this project? Yes ❑ No � o If yes,see attached Summary Sheet. ■ Report given to Contractor: Yes � No ❑ To the best of our knowledge, work inspected was done in accordance with the approved plans, specifications, and applicable workmanship provisions of the current IBC, except as noted above. :igned: \�� Date: 9-11-13 Print Full Name: Daniel P. Graham I.D. No.: 1Q54095 S18�S2 �ro�� i ''�'' Issue Date: 2D13/01/01 � Rev No.: 0 � � � Special Inspection Daily Report City of Eagan, MN. Page 1 of 1 Report No.: Structural Steel#3 Date of this Report: 9-23-13 Project Name: Building 400 Project No.: BL-12-04579A Project Address: 3905 Eagan Outlets Parkway Client: Paragon Outlets Eagan Client Project No.: Weather: Sunny PM Brad McCarter Temperature: 70 ° F Type of Inspection: Inspection Coverage: ❑ Continuous ❑ Masonry ❑ Rebar Placement ❑ Foundations ❑ Special Cases: � Periodic �Welding 8�Bolting ❑ Concrete ❑ Fireproofing ❑ Piles& Piers ❑ Tendon Placement ❑ Soils Did the architect or engineer authorize changes to City-approved plans? ❑Yes (Listed Below) ❑ No Description and location of work completed: Visual weld observations were performed in accordance with AWS D1.1 Section 6 2040 criteria on the following: 1) Bar joist fillet welds Roof Level Grid E-G 33-39 per Nucor Vulcraft details. No discrepancy noted 2) Anchor bofts at Foundation Level Grid E-G 33-39 plies in direct contact with full nut engagement present. 3) Truss girder fillet welds at Roof Level Grid E-G 33-39 per Nucor Vulcraft details. No discrepancy noted . __ _ _ _ List tests performed: Visual _._ __. __._ ___ ___ __._____ ___ __ __ ____ _ __ ___. ___ ____ ■ Are there any discrepancies noted from this day's observations? Yes ❑ No � • Are there any outstanding discrepancies on this project? Yes ❑ No � o if yes, see attached Summary Sheet. ■ Report given to Contractor: Yes � No ❑ To the best of our knowledge, work inspected was done in accardance with the approved plans, specifications, and applicable workmanship provisions of the current IBC, except as noted above. iigned: Date: 9-23-13 y, Print Full Name: Daniel P. Graham I.D. No.: 1054095 S1&S2 �� ' issue Date: 2013/U1/01 Rev No.: 0 � Special Inspection Daily Report City of Eagan, MN. Page 1 of 1 Report No.: Structural Steei#4 Date of this Report: 9-27-13 Project Name: Building 400 Project No.: BL-12-04579A Project Address: 3905 Eagan Outlets Parkway Client: Paragon Outlets Eagan Client Project No.: Weather: Sunny PM Brad McCarter Temperature: 70 ° F Type of Inspection: lnspection Coverage: ❑ Continuous ❑ Masonry ❑ Rebar Placement ❑ Foundations ❑ Special Cases: � Periodic �Welding 8�Bolting ❑ Concrete ❑ Fireproofing ❑ Piles 8�Piers ❑Tendon Placement ❑ Soils Did the architect or engineer authorize changes to City-approved plans? ❑Yes (Listed Below) ❑ No Description and location of work completed: Visual weld observations were perFormed in accordance with AWS D1.1 Section 6 2010 criteria on the following: 1) Bar joist fillet welds Roof Level Grid E-J 30-33 per Nucor Vulcraft details. No discrepancy noted 2) Anchor bolts at Foundation Level Grid E-J 30-33 plies in direct contact with full nut engagement present. 3) Truss girder fillet welds at Roof Level Grid E-J 30-33 per Nucor Vulcraft details. No discrepancy noted 4) Moment plate at bar joist and truss girders at Roof Level Grid E-J 33-39 per S51. notes and revised detail. No discrepancy noted _._ _--- _ __ -- ---- __ _--- _ _- __ __ List tests performed: _ __ --_ _ _ Visual ___ _ ____-- ---__ ____ _. ___.___ _.__._ ._--. _ _ _____ ___ _._ _._._ ___ __---- ■ Are there any discrepancies noted from this day's observations? Yes ❑ No � ■ Are there any outstanding discrepancies on this project? Yes ❑ No � o If yes,see attached Summary Sheet. ■ Report given to Contractor: Yes � No ❑ To the best of our knowledge, work inspected was done in accordance with the approved plans, spec�cations, and appficabie workmanship provisions of the current fBC, except as noted above. Signed: ��, _ Date: 9-27-13 Print Fult Name: Daniel P. Graham I.D. No.: 1054095 S1&S2 s i ., Issue Date: 2013/01/01 Rev No.: 0 � �� '�'� � � . i Speciai Inspection Daily Report City of Eagan, MN. Page 1 of 1 Report No.: Structural Steel#5 Date of this Report: 10-01-13 Project Name: Building 400 Project No.: BL-12-04579A Project Address: 3905 Eagan Outlets Parkway Client: Paragon Outiets Eagan Client Project No.: Weather: Sunny PM Brad McCarter Temperature: 70 ° F Type of inspectian: Inspection Coverage: ❑ Continuous ❑ Masonry ❑ Rebar Placement ❑ Foundations ❑ Special Cases: � Periodic �Welding 8�Bolting ❑ Concrete ❑ Fireproofing ❑ Piles 8�Piers ❑Tendon Placement ❑ Soils Did the architect or engineer authorize changes to City-approved plans? ❑Yes (Listed Below) ❑ No Description and location of work completed: --_ __ ____ ___ __. ___. ___ ___ _.__ Visual weld observations were performed in accordance with AWS D1.1 Section 6 2010 criteria on the following: 1) Bar joist fillet welds Roof Level Grid E-J 26-30 per Nucor Vulcraft details. No discrepancy noted 2) Anchor bolts at Foundation Level Grid E-J 26-30 plies in direct contact with full nut engagement present. 3) Truss girder fillet welds at Roof Level Grid E-J 26-30 per Nucor Vulcraft details. No discrepancy noted 4) Moment plate at barjoist and truss girders at Roof Level Grid E-J 26-33 per S51. notes and revised detail. No discrepancy noted _ _ ._ __ _ _____ _ __ _ _ _.__ _ __ _ _ ---_._ List tests performed: -_._ - _. _. __ __ _ _ . __ __..._ _ _ ___ _._ Visual _ . __ _---- __.. — _ __ ___ _ .._ _ _- -- - -- _. _ ___ • Are there any discrepancies noted from this day's observations? Yes ❑ No � ■ Are there any outstanding discrepancies on this project? Yes ❑ No � o !f yes, see attached Summary Sheet. ■ Report given to Contractor: Yes � No ❑ To the best of our knowledge, work inspected was done in accordance with the approved ptans, spec�cations, and applicable workmanship provisions of the current IBC, except as noted above. Signed: � Date: 10-01-13 Print Ful! Name: Daniel P. Graham I.D. No.: 1054095 S1&S2 ,q�'�. ��5� � i� ' . issue Date: 2013i01/01 Rev No.: 0 , �� s��` �� s'd�' �" � � : Special Inspection Daiiy Report City of Eagan, MN. Page 1 of 1 Report No.: Structural Steel#6 Date of this Report: 10-07-13 Project Name: Building 400 Project No.: BL-12-04579A Project Address: 3905 Eagan Outlets Parkway Client: Paragon Outlets Eagan Client Project No.: Weather: Sunny PM Brad McCarter Temperature: 70 ° F Type of Inspection: Inspection Coverage: ❑ Continuous ❑ Masonry ❑ Rebar Placement ❑ Foundations ❑ Special Cases: � Periodic �Welding 8�Bolting ❑ Concrete ❑ Fireproofing ❑ Pifes& Piers ❑Tendon Placement ❑ Soils Did the architect or engineer authorize changes to City-approved plans? ❑Yes (Listed Below) ❑ No Description and location of work completed: . ___ __ _ . ___ __---- ---- ___ ___ __ __ __ __._ _._ Visuaf weld observa#ions were performed in accordance with AWS D1.1 Section 6 2010 criteria on the following: 1) A325 3/4"tension control bolts at Roof Level Grid E-J 27-40 (Grud F 27 misaligned bolt holes column cap plate too beam flange, fillet welded on all 4 sides. Weld quality found acceptable.) No diserepancy noted 2) Puddle welds and side lap fasteners at Roof Level Grid E-J 30-40. No discrepancy noted 3) Deck support angfe and splice plate fillet welds at Roof Level Grid E-J 30-40. No discrepancy noted 4) Drag strut angle from truss girder to beam flange fillet welds Roof Level Grid E-J 26-40. No discrepancy noted List tests performed: . Visua! __ __ __._ _ _-__ _ _ __ _ _ _. __ _ _._ _ __. • Are there any discrepancies noted from this day's observations? Yes ❑ No � ■ Are there any outstanding discrepancies on this project? Yes ❑ No � a If yes, see attached Summary Sheet. • Report given to Contractor: Yes � No ❑ To the best of our knowledge,work inspected was done in accordance with the approved plans, spec�cations, and applicable workmanship provisions of the current IBC, except as noted above. Signed: �y;,�' Date: 10-07-13 Print Full Plame: Daniel P. Graham I.D. No.: 1054095 S18�S2 � ' � Issue Date: 2413/01l01 Rev No.: 0 tl' s �� Special inspection Daily Report City of Eagan, MN. Page 1 of 1 Report No.: Structural Steel#7 Date of this Report: 10-09-13 Project Name: Building 400 Project No.: BL-12-04579A Project Address: 3905 Eagan Outlets Parkway Client: Paragon Out{ets Eagan Ciient Project No.: Weather: Sunny PM Brad McCarter Temperature: 70° F Type of inspection: Inspection Coverage: ❑ Continuous ❑ Masonry ❑ Rebar Piacement ❑ Foundations ❑ Special Cases: � Periodic �Welding 8�Botting ❑ Concrete ❑ Fireproofing ❑ Piles&Piers ❑Tendon Placement ❑ Soils Did the architect or engineer authorize changes to City-approved plans? ❑ Yes (Listed Below) ❑ No Description and location of work completed: -_____ ____ _.___ _.__ .__ ___ __. _._- __ __ -__ _ _ __..__- Visual weld observations were performed in accordance with AWS D1.1 Section 6 2010 criteria on the fallowing: 1) Tube steel to plate/channel to tube steef/channel to deck support angle fillet welds at perimeter of building Grid E-J 33- 40. No discrepancy noted 2) Light gauge framing PAF/tek fasteners at deck support angte at perimeter of building Grid E-J 33-38 per Excel details, No discrepancy noted "3) Puddle welds at Roof Level Grid G.6-J 26-28(area was over stocked with roof sheetrock). Appears welds are still fused to bar joist(no ripped/tore welds apparent). Also observed from ground level no crfacked/b(istered paint observed on bar joists (no access to joist at this time). Fillet welds on bar joist to be reviewed at a later time from a lift when s(ab on grade is poured. The general contractor, Ryan was informed. _ . __ . ._ ___ _ List tests performed: __..._ __._ -__ __ ____ __.._ _ ____ _ _ __ _ _ _ __... �sual _ _ __ ___ --_ _ . ._ ___ _ _ ____ ___ __._ __ __. _ ■ Are there any discrepancies noted from this day's observations? Yes � No ❑ ■ Are there any outstanding discrepancies on this project? Yes � No ❑ o If yes, see attached Summary Sheet. • Report given to Contractor: Yes � No ❑ To the best of our knowledge, work inspected was done in accordance with the approved plans, specifications, and applicable workmanship provisions of the current IBC, except as noted above. Signed: �� Date: 10-09-13 Print Full Name: Danie! P. Graham I.D. No.: 1054095 S18�S2 ', , � � � Issue Date: 2013/01/01 Rev No.: 0 . ,y '� h Special Inspection Daily Report City of Eagan, MN. Page 1 of 1 Report No.: Structural Steel#8 Date of this Report: 10-18-13 Project Name: Building 400 Project No.: BL-12-04579A Project Address: 3905 Eagan Outlets Parkway Client: Paragon Outtets Eagan Client Project No.: Weather: Sunny PM Brad McCarter Temperature: 50 ° F Type of Inspection: Inspection Coverage: ❑ Continuous ❑ Masonry ❑ Rebar Placement ❑ Foundations ❑ Special Cases: � Periodic �Welding 8�Boiting ❑ Concrete ❑ Fireproofing ❑ Piles�Piers ❑Tendon Placement ❑ Soils Did the architect or engineer authorize changes to City-approved plans? ❑Yes (Listed Below) ❑ No Description and location of work completed: _ _ ___ ___ ___ ______ _._ . _ . _ _.__ _ Visual weld observations were performed in accordance with AWS D1.1 Section 6 2010 criteria on the following: 1). Puddle welds and side lap fasteners at Roof Level Grid E-J 27-30 per S2.6 note and RFI 176. No discrepancy noted 2) Deck support angle/splice plate fillet welds at Roof Level Grid E-J 27-30. No discrepancy noted 3) A325 1"tension control bolts at Roof Level Grid E-J 27-40. No discrepancy noted _ __ _ _ _ __ _ __. _ __ _ __ __ List tests performed: _ ___ __ _ . Visual _ _. _ _ —_ __ _. ■ Are there any discrepancies noted from this day's observations? Yes ❑ No � ■ Are there any outstanding discrepancies on this project? Yes � No ❑ o If yes, see attached Summary Sheet. • Report given to Contractor: Yes � No ❑ To the best of our knowledge,work inspected was done in accordance with the approved pians, specifications, and applicable workmanship provisions of the current IBC, except as noted above. Signed: �� Date: 10-18-13 Print Full Name: Daniel P. Graham I.D. No.: 1054095 S18�S2 � �� REQUEST FOR INFORMATION �YAH� .�,o,��,.,,,�u�„o,�s, Project: Paragon Outlet Mall RFI#: 0176 Project No: 003334000-LIVE Date: 11-Sep-2013 To: Thorson Baker&Associates Attn: Jeff Graham Subject: Building 400 Steel Question: updated with part 2 Please review the following matter and advise us how to proceed: See attached According to the Contract Documents, the steel beams on centerline 26 are at the main roof elevation and the roof deck bears directly on them. Please clarify. Part 2: the second attachment is a photo of the area where there is a gap in the deck. The decking on the main roof s�ops at the columns that support the tower roof. The column line over the left arrow (which isn't attac�ied to any decking) doesn't have much lateral support,because the tower decking is above that bearr�(and the main roof deck). This gap in the decking also leave's an area above the entire West end of th interior of the building open to the tower above. � - Suggested Response Response to part 2: fill in the gap with decking. This helps support the column line and fills in the gap in the ceiling. Cost Impact• Unknown Estimated Cost Amount: 0.00 Schedule Impact: Unknown Impact Day Type: Calendar Day Estimated Impact Days: 0.00 Further information regar�iing the above questi6n (ques�ion clarificat�on}: Please respond no later than 13-Sen-2013 to minimize delay or interference with our ability to proceed with the work. Reply To: Daniel J Harlander Company: Rvan Companies US,Inc. Please respond via Proliance if you have a Proliance User Account,otherwise please respond via email. Reply: REQUEST FOR INFORMATION �YAH� .��.,��u.w.�b, Run a 6" CSJ metal stud lengthwise to support the edge of inetal deck at the stud wall. Ensure that the deck span does not exceed 6'-0". Further information regarding the above reply (answer clarification): Reply provided by: Jeff Graham Company: Thorson Baker&Associates Attachments/References: • FW Paragon Building 400 Question.msg • East building 400 decking.pdf • Response to RFI 176 part 2.pdf Drawin�s: Nolan Beron From: leffrey O.Graham <JGraham@thorsonbaker.com> Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2013 1029 AM To: Nolan Beron Subject: RE: Building 400 Steel Question: updated with part 2 (#0176), Readand Review Nolan, I can't figure out how to respontl again to this RFL So here's my response: Yes the main roof deck shoultl continue to column line 26. Jeffrey O.Graham, PE Project Manager� Structural Engineering � ��FO�� , ,...a.ax�,w,.0. .+r.?r. .e ....,-.�;u..t'—�«,+Yu3�,. .��x..��.v r.._ . � x�`<_.i:»m` .,,a.v?��Ja- .w,.,., '.:a .v„, r,.,;�...o .>..�.. ';. ..� ,.,�..i: Xm—x.ev-_� . :X�..�2K.�-'�'.,4�.:�4`En�'°�_�.7m;'�,f`s°"Y:�9tti.a..=.2`„fi°,.. Thorson Baker+Associates � ��, CONSU�TING ENGINEERS �* ��: p:330-659-6688 f: 330-659-6675 c:330-523-6819 www.thorsonbaker.com � Please consider the e�vironment before printing this e-mail or any of its attachments.Go Paperless and Go Green! The information contained in this message and any attachment may be proprietary,confidential,and privileged or subject to the work product doctrine and thus protected from disclosure.If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient,or an employee or agent responsible(or delivering this message to the intended recipient,you are hereby noUfied that any dissemination,distribution or copying ot this communication is stricily prohibited.If you have received this communication in error,please notify me immediately by replying to this message and deleting it and alI copies and backups thereof. Thank you. � From: Proliance Notification [mailto:�roliance.notificationCa�ryancompanies.coml Sent:Thursday, October 03, 2013 10:33 AM To: Jeffrey 0. Graham Cc: brianCa�lincosteel.com; krvstal@lincosteel.com; dan.harlanderCalrvancompanies.com; Euqene.DrinkmanCa�RyanCompanies.com; ryan.harstadCa�ryancompanies.com; ,jim.madorinCalryancampanies.com; nolan.beronCalryancom�anies.com; 7efF.McKeeCa�RyanCompanies.com; ellis.po(ing(a�ryancompanies.com Subject: RFI: Building 400 Steel Question: updated with part 2 (#0176), Read and Review � � �_ : ��RFI: Building 400 Steel 4uestion:updated with part 2 t#0176) �PROJECT: Paragon Outlet Mall (#003334000-LIVE) ;Proliance Notification f� r 10/3/2013 9:32 AM(GMT-05:00) _.� ".allolan P Beron (Ryan Companies US, Inc.) =t� ��Distributed � , . -�Answer Submitted �.,��..�_::�� :�� ...� -�r�c;Normal j i � � � �` x�� `�� Read and Review 10/7/2013 � � � �, �n�' please see Part 2 to this RFL People receiving this notice: _ .. � _ Brian Schmitz Linco Fab Inc None Daniel J Harlander Ryan Companies US, Inc. �None Ellis R Poling Ryan Companies US, Inc. None Eugene Drinkman Ryan Companies US, Inc. None James B Madorin Ryan Companies US, Inc. None � Jeff Graham Thorson Baker&Associates Read and Review 7effrey M McKee Ryan Companies US, Inc. None Krystal Praught Linco Fab Inc (None Nolan P Beron Ryan Companies U5, Inc. None � Ryan S Harstad Ryan Companies US, Inc. None This message was sent by an automated system.Any replies to this email will be ignored. 2 � Issue Date: 2013/01/01 Rev No.: 0 ,, , . � � Special Inspection Daily Report City of Eagan, MN. Page 1 of 1 Report No.: Structural Steel#9 Date of this Report: 10-29-13 Project Name: Building 4Q0 Project No.: BL-12-04579A Project Address: 3905 Eagan Outlets Parkway Client: Paragon Outiets Eagan Ciient Project No.: Weather: Partly Cloudy PM Brad McCarter Temperature: 40 ° F Type of Inspection: Inspection Coverage: ❑ Continuous ❑ Masonry ❑ Rebar Placement ❑ Foundations ❑ Special Cases: � Periodic � Welding 8�Bolting ❑ Concrete ❑ Fireproofing ❑Piles&Piers ❑ Tendon Placement ❑ Soils Did the architect or engineer authorize changes to City-approved plans? ❑Yes (Listed Below) ❑ No Descnption and location of work completed: _----- ---_ ___ __ __ ----- _.__ -_ __ _..__ _._ _ _ _, _ Visual weld observations were performed in accordance with AWS D1.1 Section 6 2010 criteria on the fotlowing: 1) Puddle welds and side lap fasteners at Roof Level Grid E-J 26-27 per S2.6 note. No discrepancy noted 2} Deck support angle/splice plate fillet welds at Roof Level Grid E-J 26-27. No discrepancy noted 3) A325 1"tension control bolts at Roof Level Grid E-J 26-27. No discrepancy noted 4) A325 3J4"tension control bolts at Roof Level Grid E-J 26-27. No discrepancy noted 5) Tower x-brace angleltube steel fillet welds Grid E-J 26-27. No discrepancy noted --- -- _ _ ___. _ __ . _ . _ __ List tests performed: ____ __ _-__ __ _ - -- --__ Visual - . _ __ __ ___ __ _ ___. _ ___ _ _ ____ _ __ • Are there any discrepancies noted from this day's observations? Yes ❑ No � ■ Are there any outstanding discrepancies on this project? Yes � No ❑ o If yes, see attached Summary Sheet. • Report given to Contractor: Yes � No ❑ To the best of our knowledge,work inspected was done in accordance with the approved plans, specifications, and applicable workmanship provisions of the current IBC, except as noted above. Signed: � Date: 10-29-13 Print Full Name: Daniel P. Graham I.D. No.: 1054095 S18�S2 �� .�-� REQUEST FOR INFORMATION �Y�� wmwHC iur��c uuno�uun � Project: Paragon Outlet Mall RFI#: 0259 Project No: 003334000-LIVE Date: 18-Nov-2013 To: Thorson Baker&Associates Attn: Jeff Graham Subject: Food court angle splice plate 2 part RFI Please review the following matter and advise us how to proceed: Per the detail2/52.11 -please confirm the splice plate at the radius angle can be the same thickness as the angle. Per the detai127/S5.2 -please confirm a splice plate is needed at the angle (not shown) supporting the deck at the mid level roof. Suggested Response Cost Impact: Unknown Estimated Cost Amount: 0.00 Schedule Impact: Unlrnown Impact Day Type: Calendar Day Estimated Impact Days: 0.00 Further information regarding the above question (question clarification): Please respond no later than 20-Nov-2013 to minimize delay or interference with our ability to proceed with the worl�. Reply To: Nolan P Beron Company: Ryan Companies US.Ina Please respond via Proliance if you have a Proliance User Account,otherwise please respond via email. Reply: the splice plate at the radius angle can be the same thinkness as the angle. at detail 27/S5.2 a splice plate is not needed if the angle is welded to the curved tube a maximum of 6" from the ends of each piece of angle. otherwise provide a splice plate. Further information regarding the above reply(answer clarification): REQUEST FOR INFORMATION �Y�N� �unu�c uni.c�curroxsx�n Reply provided by: Jeff Graham Company: Thorson Baker&Associates Attachments/References: Drawin�s: 'z " �- Issue Date: 2013/01i07 Rev No.: 0 - , p ,, �� " o m Special Inspection Daily Report City of Eagan, MN. Page 1 of 1 Report No.: Structural Steel#10 Date of this Report: 11-21-13 Project Name: Building 400 Project No.: BL-12-�4579A Project Address: 3905 Eagan Outlets Parkway Client: Paragon Outlets Eagan Client Project No.: Weather: Indoors PM Brad McCarter Temperature: 30 ° F Type of Inspection: Inspection Coverage: ❑ Continuous ❑ Masonry ❑ Rebar Placement ❑ Foundations ❑ Special Cases: � Periodic �Welding & Bolting ❑ Concrete ❑ Fireproofing ❑ Piles&Piers ❑Tendon Placement ❑ Soils Did the architect or engineer authorize changes to City-approved plans? ❑Yes (Listed Below) ❑ No �escnption and location of work compfeted: __ _._-- _---_ __ -_ _ __ _____. ._--. _._ ___ _ --- Visual aveld observations were perFormed in accordance with AWS D1.1 Section 6 201d criteria on the following: 1) Outstanding discrepancy on Report#7 10-09-13 bar joists at Roof Level Grid G.6-J 26-28 (area was over stocked with roof sheetrock}. Joist lacing/chords reviewed from a lift, did not observe any shop welds to be cracked/broken loose. ._ _ __ _ __ _ _ _ . _ _ _ __ List tests pertormed: _ _. __ __ __ _______. __-- _ _ _ - -__ ___ _ _ _ . _ Visual __ _._ __ __ _ __ _.. _._ -. __ _. _ _ - ■ Are there any discrepancies noted from this day's observations? Yes ❑ No � ■ Are there any outstanding discrepancies on this project? Yes ❑ No � o If yes, see attached Summary Sheet. ■ Report given to Contractor: Yes � No ❑ To the best of our knowledge,work inspected was done in accordance with the approved plans, specifrcations, and applicable workmanship provisions of the current IBC, except as noted above. . Signed: Date: 11-21-13 Print Fu{I Name: Daniel P. Graham I.D. No.: 1054095 S18�S2 Issue Date: 2013/01/01 Rev No.; 0 L � Special Inspection Daily Report City of Eagan, MN. Page 1 of 1 Report No.: Structural Steel#11 Date of this Report: 12-10-13 Project Name: Building 400 Project No.: BL-12-04579A Project Address: 3905 Eagan Outlets Parkway Client: Paragon Outlets Eagan Client Project No.: Weather: Indoors PM Brad McCarter Temperature: 50 ° F Type of Inspection: Inspection Coverage: ❑ Continuous ❑ Masonry ❑ Rebar Placement ❑ Foundations ❑ Special Cases: � Periodic �Welding 8�Bolting ❑ Concrete ❑ Fireproofing ❑ Piles&Piers ❑Tendon Placement ❑ Soils Did the architect or engineer authorize changes to City-approved plans? ❑Yes (Listed Below) ❑ No Description and locat�on of work completed: ---- __-----__ --- __ _- -_ _ _ ---- -- - -__.. -.... .- ----- -_ _ Visual weld observations were performed in accordance with AWS D1.1 criteria on the following: 1) Bar joist/truss girder bottom chord to column stabilizer fillet welds at Roof Level Grid K-M.2 4-18.7 per Nucor Vulcraft details and S5.1 notes. No discrepancy noted 2) Uplift angle from bar joist to truss girder/beam fillet welds at Roof Level Grid K-M.2 4-18.7 per Nucor Vufcraft details and S5.1 details. No discrepancy noted ___ . _ _ _: ___ __ ___ List tests perFormed: __ __- - _ _ __ __ ___ _ _ _ __ _ _ Visual __ __ __... _ __ __ __ ____ ___ ___ __ .._ ■ Are there any discrepancies noted from this day's observations? Yes ❑ No � • Are there any outstanding discrepancies on this project? Yes ❑ No � o If yes,see attached �ummary Sheet. • Report given to Contractor: Yes � No ❑ To the best oF our knowledge,work inspected was done in accordance with the approved plans, specifications, and applicable workmanship provisions of the current IBC, except as noted above. iigned: Date: 12-10-13 Print Ful1 Name: Daniel P. Graham I.D. No.: 1054095 S1&S2 " �" �+ Issue Date: 2013101101 Rev No.: 0 r, � � +� , ',�, �� - Special Inspection Daily Report City of Eagan, MN. Page 1 of 1 Report No.: Structural Steel#12 Date of this Report: 12-30-13 Project Name: Building 400 Project No.: BL-12-04579A Project Address: 3905 Eagan Outlets Parkway Ciient: Paragon Outlets Eagan Client Project No.: Weather: Indoors PM Brad McCarter Temperature: 70 ° F Type of Inspection: Inspection Coverage: ❑ Continuous ❑ Masonry ❑ Rebar Placement ❑ Foundations ❑ Special Cases: � Periodic �Welding 8�Botting ❑ Concrete ❑ Fireproofing ❑ Piles&Piers ❑Tendon Placement ❑ Soils Did the architect or engineer authorize changes to City-approved plans? ❑Yes (Listed Below) ❑ No Descr�ption and location of work completed: _---. ------ __ ____ ____ ____ __ ___ ._ The following visual observafions were performed on bar joists from slab on grade (various areas with damaged chords/lacings). Results as follow to be reviewed by the joist supplier, Nucor: *A) Grid H-J 36-37 1st joist east of 36, 6th apex from H towards J, north diagonal bent approx. 1/2" "B) Grid G-H 34-35 3rd joist east of 34, 5th apex from G towrards H, north diagonal bent approx.314" *C) Grid E-F 33-34 3rd joist east of 33, 6th apex from E towards F, north diagonal bent/fwisted aprrox. 3/4" _ .__ _ . _. ___ _ _ ___ _ List tests performed: _ ____ __ _ ---__ . __ __ Visual ._ __ _. _ _ _ __ _ . __ __ _ . _ _ : ■ Are there any discrepancies noted from this day's observations? Yes � No ❑ ■ Are there any outstanding discrepancies on this project? Yes � No ❑ o if yes, see attached Summary Sheet. • Report given to Contractor: Yes � No ❑ To the best of our knowledge, work inspected was done in accordance with the approved plans, specifications, and applicable workmanship provisions of the current IBC, except as noted above. Signed: �' Date: 12-30-13 Print Full Name: Daniel P. Graham 8�Troy Bauman I.D. No.: 1054095 S1&S2 j' � +�� ''' {ssue Date: 2013/01/01 Rev No.: 0 ' •b � § �� Special Inspection Daily Report City of Eagan, MN. Page 1 of 1 Report No.: Structural Steel#13 Date of this Report: 4-14-14 Project Name: Building 400 Project No.: BL-12-04579A Project Address: 3905 Eagan Outlets Parkway Client: Paragon Outlets Eagan Client Project No.: Weather: Indoors PM Brad McCarter Temperature: 70 ° F Type of Inspection: Inspection Coverage: ❑ Continuous ❑ Masonry ❑ Rebar Placement ❑ Foundations ❑ Special Cases: � Periodic �Welding 8�Bolting ❑ Concrete ❑ Fireproofing ❑ Piles 8�Piers ❑ Tendon Placement ❑ Soils Did the architect or engineer authorize changes to City-approved plans? ❑Yes (Listed Below) ❑ No Description and location of work completed: �sual weld observations were performed in accordance with AWS D1.1 2010 criteria on outstanding discrepancies on Report#12 12-30-13 Item A) Grid H-J 36-37 1 st joist east of 36, 6th apex from H towards J, north diagonal bent approx. 1/2", Item B) Grid G-H 34-35 3rd joist east of 34, 5th apex from G towards H, north diagonal bent approx. 3/4"and Item C) Grid E-F 33-34 3rd joist east of 33, 6th apex from E towards F, north diagonal benUtwisted aprrox. 3/4" have now been repaired per Nucor frxes. No discrepancy noted __ __ . __ _ _ _ ___ _ _--_ _ _ ___. . _ __ _ __ List tests performed: _ _ _ _ _ . ___ Visual . -____. ___ ___ __ _._._ _ ___ .____ _ ___ ___ ___ ■ Are there any discrepancies noted from this day's observations? Yes ❑ No � ■ Are there any outstanding discrepancies on this project? Yes ❑ No � o If yes, see attached Summary Sheet. ■ Report given to Contractor: Yes � No ❑ To the best of our knowledge,work inspected was done in accordance with the approved plans, specifications, and applicable workmanship provisions of the current IBC, except as noted above. Signed: Date: 4-14-14 Print Full Name: Daniel P. Graham I.D. No.: 1054095 S1&S2 ' ' � ��'� ��`� Issue Date: 2013/01/07 Rev No.: 0 1 ,� � � �.� _ � Summary of Discrepancies Needing Correction or Review � - by the Design Engineer or Architect Project Name: Paragon Outlets Eagan Building 400 Structural Steel Project Address: 3905 Eagan Outlets Parkway,Eagan,MN. BIr12-04579A PM Brad McCarter The following items must be reviewed by the engineer and/or corrected and/or inspected before work can continue in the area. Report No. Report Description Resolution to O/C Status Date Discre an *3) Puddle welds at Roof Level Grid G.6-J 26-28(area was over stocked with roof sheetrock). Appears welds are still fused to bar joist(no ripped/tore welds apparent). Also observed from closed 11-21- 7 10-09-13 ground level no crfacked/blistered paint observed on bar joists joist reviewed 13 (no access to joist at this time). Fillet welds on bar joist to be reviewed at a later time from a lift when slab on grade is poured. The eneral contractor,Ryan was infortned. The following visual observations were performed on bar joists from slab on grade(various areas with damaged chordsllacings). Results as follow to be reviewed by the joist supplier,Nucor: *A) Grid H-J 36-37 lst joist east of 36,6th apex from H repaired per closed 4-14- 12 12-30-13 towards J,north diagonal bent approx. 1/2" Nucor fu�es 14 *B) Grid G-H 34-35 3rd joist east of 34,Sth apex from G towards H,north diagonal bent approx.3/4" *C) Grid E-F 33-34 3rd joist east of 33,6th apex from E towards F,north dia onal bent/twisted a rrox.3/4"