The URL can be used to link to this page

3965 Eagan Outlets Pkwy Use BLUE or BLACK Ink For Office Use / 41 I City of Eapn Permit l0 I I Permit Fee: 4 3830 Pilot Knob Road I I Eagan MN 55122 Date Received: I Phone: (651) 675-5675 Q/ I Fax: (651) 675-5694 Staff: f F"1 2013 COMMERCIAL PLUMBING PERMIT APPLICATION ❑ Please submit two (2) sets of plans with all commercial applications. L{-C il,A 0 /_jf0j P/6&k.t.!V it 3Un Date: -7-j-13 Site Address: r Tenant: Suite Property Owner Name: Phone: ~n Name: 1~5.. License 6lL~ 'PrvA Contractor Address: 15-/S S~f'1 ST Gp S City: 1Ao0k-.,n S State: /"n Zip: Phone: 7 f Z ~'3e y3 CV Email: (Gv~( VGtSr✓i1 I~~+b~ . (,lrrh Type of Work New _ Replacement - Repair _ Rebuild - Modify Space -Work in R.O.W. Description of work: COMMERCIAL New Construction Modify Space Irrigation System yes / _ no) RPZ / _ PVB) • Rain sensors required on irrigation systems Permit Type . Avg. GPM (2" turbo required unless smaller size allowed by Public Works) Meters Call (651) 675-5646 to verity that tests passed prior to picking up meter. Domestic: Size & Type Z 11 Fire: 1 Avg. GPM High demand devices? Yes No Flushometers Yes No COMMERCIAL FEES Contract value $ 3 2. dt UVO X.01 $55.00 Permit Fee Minimum _ $ Permit Fee *If contract value is LESS than $10,010, Surcharge = $5.00 = $ Surcharge* **If contract value is GREATER than $10,010, Surcharge = Contract Value x $0.0005 ***If the project valuation is over $1 million, please call for Surcharge = $ TOTAL FEE Following fees apply when installing a new lawn irrigation system $ Water Permit Contact the City's Engineering Department, (651) 675-5646, for required fee amounts. $ Treatment Plant $ Water Supply & Storage $ State Surcharge = $ TOTAL FEE CALL BEFORE YOU DIG. Call Gopher State One Call at (651) 454-0002 for protection against underground utility damage. Call 48 hours before you intend to dig to receive locates of underground utilities. www.gopherstateonecall.org I hereby acknowledge that this information is complete and accurate; that the work will be in conformance with the ordinances and codes of the City of Eagan; that I understand this is not a permit, but only an application for a permit, and work is not to start without a permit; that the work will be in accordance with the approved plan in the case of work which requires a review and approval of plans. x V/'--R 1, l) v 5> x Applicant's Printed Name Applicant's Signature FOR OFFICE USE Approved By: Date:1 3 Required Inspections: Under Ground Rough-In Air Test Gas Test Final PRV Required: _ Yes No Page 1 of 3 Use BLUE or BLACK Ink 2013 SEWER AND WATER CONNECTION AND AVAILABILITY CHARGES EXISTING COMMERCIAL PROPERTY (if applicable) Date: FOR OFFICE USE ONLY Property Owner: _ PRV required Address: Phone Number: _ City R-O-W Permit County R-O-W Permit Plumber: Contact Name: SEWER WATER Sewer Service Water Service Sewer lateral charge Water lateral charge Sewer trunk Water trunk City SAC @ $100/unit Water supply storage MCES SAC @ $2,435/unit Receipt Date: Receipt , Date: Treatment Plant @ $801/unit Permit Fee $60.00 Permit Fee $60.00 State Surcharge $5.00 State Surcharge $5.00 TOTAL: 'Plumbing Permit Required - water meter to be acquired with building permit TOTAL: SEWER & WATER Sewer Service Water Service Sewer lateral charge Water lateral charge Sewer trunk Water trunk City SAC MCES SAC Receipt # Date Water supply & storage Receipt # Date Treatment plant Permit Fee $120.00 State Surcharge $5.00 'Plumbing Permit Required - water meter to be acquired with building permit TOTAL: Number of SAC units is determined by the Metropolitan Council Environmental Services (651) 602-1000. Sanitary Sewer Trunk Connection Charge applies if not charged sewer trunk by assessment in the past. 1-5 SAC units 1,780.00 per SAC unit r -----------------I 6-10 SAC units 8,900.00 plus 445.00 per SAC unit over 5 1 For Office Use 11+ SAC units 11,130.00 plus 178.00 per SAC unit over 10 1 Permit 1 I I I 1 Permit Fee: 1 I 1 I 1 I Date Received: I I I Staff: Cc: City of Eagan Finance Department Page 2 of 3 Use BLUE or BLACK Ink I-,_________.__ _ For Office Use Permit City of Eap 3830 Pilot Knob Road I Permit Fee: 3 Eagan MN 55122 i i Phone: (651) 675-5675 I Date Received: 1 I I Fax: (651) 675-5694 i ~ Staff` i 2013 MECHANICAL PERMIT APPLICATION Please submit two (2) sets of plans with all conirnerc;-l applications. t Date. Site ,address Tenant _ Suite Resident/Owner Nam --lone: Address f City / Zip Name: License Contractor Address: - - - - - - - City: - - Stut~-: , 74) - Phone: - _ Err : N'~)w Repl: ement Dem fl;ion Type of Work Description of work: NOTE: Roof mounted and ground mounted mechanical equipment is required to be screened by City Code. Please contact the Mechanical inspector for information on permitted screening methods. dR'ESIDENTIAC. COMMERCIAL _ Furnace" New Construction Interior Improvement Permit Type ® Air Conditioner Install Piping Processed Air Exchanger Gas Exterior HVAC Unit E - Heat Pump _ Under/Above ground Tank Install! T Remove) Other RESIDENTIAL FEES $60.00 Minimum Add or alteration to an existing unit (it-Ictudes $5.00 State Surcharge) $100.00 Residential New (includes $5.00 State Surcharge) _ $ TOTAL FEE COMMERCIAL FEES qLZ6 Contract Value X.01 $55,00 Permit Fee Minimum $70,00 Underground tank installationtremoval Permit Fee *If contract value is LESS than $10,010, Surcharge = $5.00 Surcharge* **If contract value is GREATER than $10,010, Surcharge = Contract Value x $0.0005 ***If the project valuation is over $1 million, please call for Surcharge TOTAL. FEE I hereby acknowledge that this information is complete and accurate; that the work will be in conformance with the ordinances and codes or the City of Eagan; that 1 understand this is not a permit, but only an application for a permit, and work is not to start without a permit; that the work will be in accordance with the approved plan in the case of work which requires a review and approval of plans, x - - x - - - - Applicant's Printed Name Appl'icar `'S Signature FOR OFFICE USE Required Inspections: Reviewed By: Date:2 r< Underground Rough In Air Test KGas Service Test In-floor Heat tC'" Final HVAC Screening Date: Cit o Ea 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan MN 55122 Phone: (651) 675-5675 Fax: (651) 675-5694 S W_ It\&11 Use BLUE or BLACK Ink For Office Use Permit #: lttp10 Date Received: 6'1013 Stat#. ' /�% Permit Fee: 311 2013 COMMERCIAL BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION May 16, 2013 Site Address: 3965 Eagan Outlets Parkway (Building 300) Tenant Name Paragon Outlets Cedar Grove (Tenant is: X New / Former Tenant: N/A Existing) Suite Name: Paragon Outlets Eagan LLC. Phone. 410-856-1812 Address / City / Zip: c/o Paragon Outlet Partners LLC. , 217 East Redwood St. - 21st flr. Baltimore, MD 21202 Applicant ist. X Owner Contractor Description of work; A new 80,906 s.f. (GBA) shell retail structure including site work Construction Cost: $8,064,000 Name: Ryan Companies US, Inc. Address: 50 South 10th Street, Suite 300 Contact: Brian Kombrink City; Minneapolis Phone: 612-492-4312 Email: Brian.Kombrink@RyanCompanies.com Name: Dal Pos Architects, LLC/Taras Pawliw, AIA Registration #: 43971 Address: 101 N. Clinton Stree, Suite 300City: Syracuse State; NY Zip: 13202 Phone: 315-422-0201 Contact Person: Dennis E. Cox, AIA Email dcox@dalpos.com at '00 U t xcnva. Licensed plumber installing new sewer/water service: -i r'Anr Flu,nbiug Phone #:442-9-3'84-3Q44" NOTE Flans d suat you'submit are:ctipsrdE the information maybe cla si led as non publ%./f yrau provide per conclude that tile' ,are trade see toS I 1 public inforrriation Poi rns thertti d perrriit the CALL BEFORE YOU DIG. Call Gopher State One CaII at (651) 454-0002 for protection against underground utility damage. Call 48 hours before you intend to dig to receive locates of underground utilities, www.gopherstateonecali.orq I hereby acknowledge that this information is complete and accurate; that the work will be in conformance with the ordinances and codes of the City of Eagan; that I understand this is not a permit, but only an application for a permit, and work is not to start without a permit; that the work will be in accordance with the approved plan in the case of work which require a rgriew and approval of plans. x RrxriJ 1 ti L x — Applicant's Printed Name Applicant's Signature Page 1 of 3 1261(05 Ck.91i0vill, OkitklAS DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE i ROO SUB TYPES Foundation V Commercial / Industrial Apartments Miscellaneous WORK TYPES i/ New Addition Alteration Replace Salon Owner Change DESCRIPTION Valuation Plan Review (25% 100% */) Census Code # of Units # of Buildings Type of Construction Public Facility Accessory Building Greenhouse / Tent Antennae interior improvement Exterior Improvement Repair Water Damage 01 - two --- Occupancy Code Edition Zoning 0 REQUIRED INSPECTIONS s/ Footings (New Building) Footings (Deck) Footings (Addition) V Foundation Drain Tile ,/ Roof: __Decking Insulation v/ Framing Fireplace: /Rough In /Air Test V insulation Meter Size: Stories Square Feet Length Width 1// */ Ice & Water Final Final Final C/O Inspection: Schedule Fire Marshal to be present: Reviewed By: Cl'Alt/ , Building Inspector Exterior Alteration—Apartments Exterior Alteration—Commercial Exterior Alteration—Public Facility Siding Reroof Windows Fire Repair Demolish Building* Demolish Interior Demolish Foundation Retaining Wall *Demolition of entire building — give PCA handout to applicant 2-orp7 Ai:56A 1) 1 MCES System SAC Units City Water Booster Pump PRV Fire Sprinklers V/i Sheetrock Final / C.O. Required Final / No C.O. Required J Other: PM4 11117/NC" Pool: Footings Air/Gas Tests Fiyal / Siding: Stucco Lath Stone Lath Brick Windows Retaining Wall Erosion Control • V Yes No Reviewed By: • , Planning COMMERCIAL FEES Base Fee Surcharge Plan Review MCES SAC City SAC S&W Permit & Surcharge Treatment Plant Treatment Plant (Irrigation) Park Dedication Trail Dedication Water Quality Water Quality Water Supply & Storage (WAC) Storm Sewer Trunk Sewer Trunk Water Trunk Street Lateral Street Water Lateral Other: , TOTAL I ) .0 , / Page 2 of 3 Dale Schoeppner Chief Building Official City of Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55122-1810 Dear Mr. Schoeppner: 1"Iflo April 30, 2013 The Metropolitan Council Environmental Services (MCES) Division has determined the SAC to be charged for the wastewater capacity demand for Paragon Outlets building 300 to be located at 3965 Eagan Outlets Pkwy. within the City of Eagan. The City will be charged 5 SAC Units for this project, as determined below. The Council understands this building is speculative retail. SAC Units Charges: Office 588 sq. ft. @ 2400 sq. ft. /SAC Unit 0.25 Meeting 214 sq. ft. @ 1650 sq. ft. /SAC Unit 0.13 Retail (speculative) 67514 sq. ft. @ 3000 sq. ft. /SAC Unit 22.50 Counter seating 42 ft. /1.5 ft. /seat @ 10 seats/SAC Unit 2.80 Indoor seating (non -fixed) 5689 sq. ft. / 15 sq. ft. /seat @ 10 seats/SAC Unit 37.93 Total Charge: 63.61 - Lct Credits: Cedar Grove Phased Development 59.00 Net Charge: 4.61 or 5 At the time the finishing permits are issued, if the use changes from its speculative use to a different use, then the SAC assignment needs to be reviewed based on that change. The business information was provided to MCES by the applicant at this time. It is also the 390 Robert Street North 1 St. Paul, MN 55101-1805 Phone 651.602.1000 1 Fax 651.602.1550 I TTY 651.291.0904 I metrocouncii.org An Equal Opportunity Ernployer M. oTROt�O TAN 010 City's responsibility to substantiate the business use and size at the time of the final inspection. If there is a change in use or size, a redetermination will need to be made. If you have any questions, call me at 651-602-1118 or email karon.cappaert@metc.state.mn.us. Sincerely, Karon Cappaert SAC Program Technical Specialist Environmental Services Division KC:kg: 130430A4 Determination expiration: 04/30/2015 cc: J. Nye, MCES Amy Griffin, Eagan (email) Salem LaHood, Paragon (email) Page - 2 1 April 30. 2013 I METROPOLITAN COUNCIL 411' CityofEaaali 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan MN 55122 Phone: (651) 675-5675 Fax: (651) 675-5694 Use BLUE or BLACK Ink For Office Use Permit #: i a(i Li Permit Fee: ( 77. 63 Date Received: I Staff: Ln2 2013 FIRE SUPPRESSION SYSTEMS PERMIT APPLICATION* Date: IJ J2.5 jZO)3 Site Address: 39(5 /..c,yan °Ad-5 Paf&wcoy Tenant: Suite #: Name: Phone: Address / City / Zip: Applicant is: Owner Contractor Description of work: Nei.) w°.# S y5km, dry S year m f Wu f! hydro n 5 Construction Cost: /S I, 000 Estimated Completion Date: Of] 1?)2oii Name: Ahern Ire P(Gi-rt-+ion License #: C_039 Address: 13705 2.(04' Ave_ , Suer- 110 State: A41.1 Zip: S51-141 City: ekyrnocxl, Phone: (7103) 2,&- OSi5 Contact: Char VC.- 1v t\e( Email: Crr1: IA crag ca.hern..Cre •. C6In. FIRE PERMIT TYPE )( Sprinkler System (# of heads NO) _ Fire Pump _ Standpipe Other: WORK TYPE X New _ Addition Alterations Remodel Other: DESCRIPTION OF WORK: X Commercial Residential Educational FEES $55.00 Permit Fee Minimum *If contract value is LESS than $10,010, Surcharge = $5.00 **If contract value is GREATER than $10,010, Surcharge = Contract Value x $0.0005 ***If the project valuation is over $1 million, please call for Surcharge Contract Value $ 154 eG00 x .01 _ $ 1,540 =$ 17 =$ I,(pt-1 Permit Fee Surcharge* TOTAL FEE 3/4" Displacement Fire Meter - $245.00 = $ 245 Fire Meter _ $ I r BGaZ TOTAL FEE *Requirements: 2 complete sets of drawings and specifications, cut sheets on materials and components to be used I hereby apply for a Fire Suppression System permit and acknowledge that the information is complete and accurate; that the work will be in conformance with the ordinances and codes of the City of Eagan and with the Minnesota Building/Fire Codes; that I understand this is not a permit, but only an application for a permit, and work is not to start without a permit; that the work will be in accordance with the approved plan in the case of work which requires a review and approval of plans. x C -ha r l; C 1Vl it C r Applicant's Printed Name Applicant's Signature a oosy Gity of Eaall 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan MN 55122 Phone: (651) 675-5675 Fax: (651) 675-5694 Use BLUE or BLACK Ink For Office Use Permit alt: ‘ Q 1 )3 Permit l=ee: LI 01 Date Received: 5 j 1 q Staff: ..1 2 2014 COMMERCIAL FIRE ALARM PERMIT APPLICATION* Date: J ' - tC't Site Address: S (5 EA se, OUT Lf TS ?•'t r rN-1 Tenant: Pt'0t1Z Pv C.ok,.. 0 ,-)T t i suite*: � y Name: Phone: Address/City/Zip: Applicant is: Owner Contractor Description of work: AA l N w F„ r c Construction Cost: Estimated Completion Date: Name: VIM if T.ect w fogy Cl 0u [ Address: cb SS r 17,3f4 State: %fir, Zip: S S 37 t Contact: 5A --e" Mac L DESCRIPTION OF WORK: v Fie License #: `t S o (s 7-1 City: SetV dPr G 6 Phone: R 5.2-- R(00- Sof e)?- Contact: 2 Email: St10 CQ cat.c.nnTG. Carty _ Remodel _ Other. 1C Commerciai _ Residential _ Educational FEES $55.00 Permit Fee Minimum *If contract value is LESS than $10,010, Surcharge = $5.00 **If contract value is GREATER than $10,010, Surcharge = Contract Value x $0.0005 ***If the project valuation is over $1 million, please call for Surcharge Contract Value $ x .01 = $ (Y Permit fee = $ � Surcharge* = $ W V a\) TOTAL FEE *Requirements: 2 complete sets of drawings and specifications, cut sheets on materials and components to be used I hereby apply for a Fire Alarm permit and acknowledge that the information is complete and accurate; that the work will be in conformance with the ordinances and codes of the City of Eagan and with the Minnesota Building/Fire Codes: that I understand this is not a permit, but only an application for a permit, and work is not to start without a permit; that the work will be in accordance with the approved plan in the case of work which requires a review and approval of plans. cue. AAq 4/1 Applicant's Printed Name 1 A _, clt of �� e�o � � TO: Scott Peterson, Building Inspections #� Zo Jon Hohenstein, Community Development Mike Ridley, Planning Darrin Bramwell, Fire �llarshal Russ Matthys, Engineering John Gorder, Engineering Aaron Nelson, Engineering Leon Weiland, Engin�ering Jon Eaton, Utilities Eric Macbeth, Maintenance Gregg Hove, Maintenance Lt. Mike Fineran, Poliee FROM: Craig Novaczyk, Senior Building Inspector DATE: 5/15/2013 RE: Plan Review For: Paragon Building #300 3965 Eagan Outlets Parkway The plans are in our plan review section for your review and comment. Please return this form to my attention with your signed comments within 7 days. Please indicate any concerns you have with these plans and resolve these issues with the affected parties. If you are requesting that issuance of the building permit be held, please submit the proper"hold request" form to me. Comments: �--+i.��e�.¢--� �+`� �-�`,....�.�r->9.fl.r Indicate below any fees that are to be collected with the building permit. Amount ❑ Yes ❑ No Landscape Security Required Zoning: ❑ Yes ❑ No Water Quality Dedication Meter Size: ❑ Yes ❑ No Park Dedication ❑ Yes ❑ No Trail Dedication ❑ Yes ❑ No Tree Dedication ❑ Yes ❑ No PRV Required Signature Date G:\Building Inspections\FORMS\Commercial Bldgs Final & Plan Review Letters Clt of �a �� e�o Y � TO; �/�cott Peterson, Building Inspections # 22 Jon Hohenstein, Community Development ✓9llike Ridley, Planning �Darrin Bramwell, Fire Marshal Russ Matthys, Engineering John Gorder, Engineering Aaron Nelson, Engineering Leon Weiland, Engineering �/ on Eaton, Utilities �ric Macbeth, Maintenance ✓Gregg Hove, Maintenance Lt. Mike Fineran, Police FROM: Craig Novaczyk, Senior Building Inspector DATE: 5/15/2013 RE: Plan Review For: Paragon Building #300 3965 Eagan Outlets Parkway The plans are in our plan review section for your review and comment. Please return this form to my attention with your signed comments within 7 days. Please indicate any concerns you have with these plans and resolve these issues with the affected parties. If you are requesting that issuance of the building permit be held, please submit the proper"hold request" form to me. Comments: Indicate below any fees that are to be collected with the building permit. Amount ❑ Yes ❑ No Landscape Security Required Zoning: ❑ Yes ❑ No Water Quality Dedication Meter Size: ❑ Yes ❑ No Park Dedication ❑ Yes ❑ No Trail Dedication ❑ Yes ❑ No Tree Dedication ❑ Yes ❑ No PRV Required Signature Date G:\Building Inspections\FORMS\Commercial Bldgs Final & Plan Review Letters C�t of �a �� e�o � � TO: Scott Peterson, Building Inspections #�� Jon Hohenstein, Community Development Mike Ridley, Planning Darrin Bramwell, Fire Marshal Russ Matthys, Engineering John Gorder, Engineering Aaron Nelson, Engineering Leon Weiland, Engineering Jon Eaton, Utilities Eric Macbeth, Maintenance Gregg Hove, Maintenance Lt. Mike Fineran, Police FROM: Craig Novaczyk, Senior Building Inspector DATE: 5/15/2013 RE: Plan Review For: Paragon Building #300 3965 Eagan Outlets Parkway The plans are in our plan review section for your review and comment. Please return this form to my attention with your signed comments within 7 days. Please indicate any concerns you have with these plans and resolve these issues with the affected parties. If you are requesting that issuance of the building permit be held, please submit the proper"hold request"form to me. Comments: Indicate below any fees that are to be collected with the building permit. Amount ❑ Yes ❑. No Landscape Security Required Zoning: ❑ Yes �e No Water Qua�ity Dedication Meter Size: ❑ Yes ❑ No Park Dedication ❑ Yes ❑ No Trail Dedication ❑ Yes ❑ No Tree Dedication ❑ Y No PRV Required _ � l��i � Signature Date G:\Building Inspections\FORMS\Commercial Bldgs Final & Plan Review Letters Clt of �a a� �e�o � � TO: Scott Peterson, Building Inspections #�?2` Jon Hohenstein, Community Development � Mike Ridiey, Planning Darrin Bramwell, Fire Marshal Russ Matthys, Engineering John Gorder, Engineering Aaron Nelson, Engineering Leon Weiland, Engineering Jon Eaton, Utilities Eric Macbeth, Maintenance Gregg Hove, Maintenance Lt. Mike Fineran, Police FROM: Craig Novaczyk, Senior Building Inspector DATE: 5/15/2013 RE: Plan Review For: Paragon Building #300 3965 Eagan Outlets Parkway The plans are in our plan review section for your review and comment. Please return this form to my attention with your signed comments within 7 days. Please indicate any concerns you have with these plans and resolve these issues with the affected parties. If you are requesting that issuance of the building permit be held, please submit the proper"hold request" form to me. Comments: N�N� Indicate below any fees that are to be collected with the building permit. Amount ❑ Yes ❑ No Landscape Security Required Zoning: ❑ Yes ❑ No Water Quality Dedication Meter Size: ❑ Yes ❑ No Park Dedication ❑ Yes ❑ No Trail Dedication ❑ Yes ❑ No Tree Dedication ❑ Yes ❑ N PRV equired .•�— � �� Sig tu Date G:\Building Inspections\FORMS\Commercial Bldgs Final & Plan Review Letters �/�Yv ' Clt of �a �� e�o � � TO: Scott Peterson, Building Inspections #r2�L'� Jon Hohenstein, Community Development Mike Ridley, Planning Darrin Bramwell, Fire Marshal Russ Matthys, Engineering John Gorder, Engineering Aaron Nelson, Engineering Leon Weiland, Engineering Jon Eaton, Utilities Eric Macbeth, Maintenance Gregg Hove, Maintenance Lt. Mike Fineran, Police FROM: Craig Novaczyk, Senior Building Inspector DATE: 5/15/2013 RE: Plan Review For: Paragon Building #300 3965 Eagan Outlets Parkway The plans are in our plan review section for your review and comment. Please return this form to my attention with your signed comments within 7 days. Please indicate any concerns you have with these plans and resolve these issues with the affected parties. If you are requesting that issuance of the building permit be held, please submit the proper "hold request"form to me. Comments: � �a � �, Indicate below any fees that are to be collected with the building permit. Amount �� ❑ Yes ,��No Landscape Security Required Zoning: ❑ Yes � No Water Quality Dedication Meter Size: ❑ Yes L� No Park Dedication ❑ Yes � No Trail Dedication ❑ Yes � No Tree Dedication ❑ Yes ❑ No PRV Required - - ,� �' ' �,;�.� �a�� Z-�-( ( l� � Signature Date G:\Building Inspections\FORMS\Commercial Bldgs Final & Plan Review Letters Clt of �a �� e�o � � TO: Scott Peterson, Building Inspections #32' Jon Hohenstein, Community Development � Mike Ridley, Planning Darrin Bramwell, Fire Marshal Russ Matthys, Engineering John Gorder, Engineering Aaron Nelson, Engineering Leon Weiland, Engineering Jon Eaton, Utilities Eric Macbeth, Maintenance Gregg Hove, Maintenance Lt. Mike Fineran, Police FROM: Craig Novaczyk, Senior Building Inspector DATE: 5/15/2013 RE: Plan Review For: Paragon Building #300 3965 Eagan Outlets Parkway The plans are in our plan review section for your review and comment. Please return this form to my attention with your signed comments within 7 days. Please indicate any concerns you have with these plans and resolve these issues with the affected parties. If you are requesting that issuance of the building permit be held, please submit the proper"hold request" form to me. Comments: Indicate below any fees that are to be collected with the building permit. Amount ❑ Yes ❑ No Landscape Security Required Zoning: ❑ Yes ❑ No Water Quality Dedication Meter Size: ❑ Yes ❑ No Park Dedication ❑ Yes ❑ No Trail Dedication ❑ Yes ❑ No Tree Dedication ❑ Yes ❑ No PRV Required v � J `[.�� I� Signature Date G:\Building Inspections\FORMS\Commercial Bldgs Final & Plan Review Letters Clt of �a a� �e�o � � TO: Scott Peterson, Building Inspections #�2' Jon Hohenstein, Community Development � Mike Ridiey, Planning Darrin Bramweil, Fire Marshal Russ Matthys, Engineering John Gorder, Engineering Aaron Nelson, Engineering Leon Weiland, Engineering Jon Eaton, Utilities Eric Macbeth, Maintenance Gregg Hove, Maintenance Lt. Mike Fineran, Police FROM: Craig Novaczyk, Senior Building Inspector DATE: 5/15/2013 RE: Plan Review For: Paragon Building #300 3965 Eagan Outlets Parkway The plans are in our plan review section for your review and comment. Please return this form to my attention with your signed comments within 7 days. Please indicate any concerns you have with these plans and resolve these issues with the affected parties. If you are requesting that issuance of the building permit be held, please submit the proper "hold requesY' form to me. Comments: Indicate below any fees that are to be collected with the building permit. Amount ❑ Yes ❑ No Landscape Security Required Zoning: ❑ Yes ❑ No Water Quality Dedication Meter Size: ❑ Yes ❑ No Park Dedication ❑ Yes ❑ No Trail Dedication ❑ Y 's ❑ No Tree Dedication ❑ Y s No PRV Required sI ,3o01� � n ture Date G:\Building Inspections\FORMS\Commercial Bldgs Final & Plan Review Letters Clt of �a a� �e�o � � TO: Scott Peterson, Building Inspections # 22 Jon Hohenstein, Community Development Mike Ridley, Planning Darrin Bramwell, Fire Marshal Russ Matthys, Engineering John Gorder, Engineering Aaron Nelson, Engineering Leon Weiland, Engineering Jon Eaton, Utilities Eric Macbeth, Maintenance Gregg Hove, Maintenance Lt. Mike Fineran, Police FROM: Craig Novaczyk, Senior Building Inspector DATE: 5/15/2013 RE: Plan Review For: Paragon Building #300 3965 Eagan Outlets Parkway The plans are in our plan review section for your review and comment. Please return this form to my attention with your signed comments within 7 days. Please indicate any concerns you have with these plans and resolve these issues with the affected parties. If you are requesting that issuance of the building permit be held, please submit the proper "hold request"form to me. Comments: �`/ �^G'�!J-5 , MGr�r�i � /��f'"h�'oo s�S G1 G�/� Indicate below any fees that are to be collected with the building permit. Amount ❑ Yes ❑ No Landscape Security Required Zoning: ❑ Yes ❑ No Water Quality Dedication Meter Size: ❑ Yes ❑ No Park Dedication ❑ Yes ❑ No Trail Dedication ❑ Yes ❑ No Tree Dedication ❑ Yes ❑ No PRV Required 5 P Sf�� /�3 Signature Date G:\Building Inspections\FORMS\Commercial Bldgs Final & Plan Review Letters Envelope Compiiance Test Resuits Building_300 Project Summary Information Name: Building_300 Address: 3995 Eagan Outlets Parkway City/State/Zip; Eagan, MN Climate Location:Eagan, Minnesota Standard EnvStd climate data is used for compliance Criteria Table:6A Floor Area (ft2):91704 Gross WaIJ Area(ft2):25104 Window Area,(ftZ)`. 11403 Window Wall Ratio: 0.454 Gross Roof Area(ft2): 91704 Skylight Area(ftZ): 0 Skylight Roof Ratio: 0.000 Door Area(ftz):0 Com liance Summa --PASSES EPF Pro osed Standard Mar in Roofs 7291 10936 3645 Skylights 0 0 0 Exterior Walls and Windows 10823 11322 498 Below-Grade Walls 0 0 0 Floors 0 0 0 Slabs 0 0 0 Daylighting Potential 18188 19565 1376 Total 36303 41823 5520 O a ue Construction Schedule Code Descri tion Net Area/Len th U-factor HC R-Cav R-Shth C-1 Metal Framing-Metal framing-3.5 in. (89 mm) 13701 0.055 n.a. 13.0 10.0 studs at 16 in. (400 mm)o.c.-Wall,Above Gratle Rcav-13+ Rshth-10 C-2 Insulation Entirely Above Deck or Mass- 91704 0.042 n.a. 0.0 23.0 Insulation Entirely Above Deck or Mass-Roof R- 23 Total 105405 Fenestration Schedule Code Descri tion Area U-factor SHGC SC Tvis G-1 User Definetl-Window-Fixed-Aluminum with Thermal 11403 0.500 0.730 0.849 0.800 Break-Clear Tenant_Glass(User Defined) Total 11403 Area Space Category:Bldg_300 Floor Area(ft2);91704 Gross Wall Area(ft2):25104 Window Area{ftZ}: 11403 Window Wall Ratio:0.454 ' Gross Roof Area(ftZ): 91704 Skylight Area(ftz):0 Skylight Roof Ratio: 0.000 Door Area(ftz}:0 Surfaces Name T e Const. Code Area Orient Notes Roof Roof G2 91704 n/a n.a. North_Wall,_W Wall C-1 3660 North n.a. ith Gano ASHRAE/IESNAStandard 90.1-2004 05/13/13 Envelope Compliance Test Results Building_30Q North Wall,_W Wall C-1 2595 North � n.a. ith_No_Canop Y Northwest_Wal Wall C-1 570 Northwest n.a. I West Wall,_W Wall C-1 1380 West n.a. ith Ganopy West_Wall,_W Wall C-1 930 West n.a. ith_No Canop Y Southwest Wa Wall C-1 570 Southwest n.a. II South Wall,_ Wall C-1 3660 South n.a. With Canopy South_Wall,_ Wali C-1 2910 South n.a. With No Cano PY East_Wall Ten Wall C-1 945 East n.a. ants East Wall_Foo Wall G1 3072 East n.a. d Court Food Pavilion Wall G1 2332 West n.a. W est Food Pavilion Wali C-1 1060 North n.a. North Food Pavilion Wall C-1 1060 Sauth n.a. South Food Pavilion Wall C-1 360 East n.a. East Total 116808 Openin s Name T e Const.Code Area Orient. Notes Glass Wintlow G-1 1944 North Overhang PF=0.35 North Glass Window G-1 1193 North Overhang PF=0.44 North Glass_w Window G-1 90 North Overhang PF= 1.11 ith 10' overha ng— Northwest Gla Window G-1 216 Northwest Overhang PF= 1.11 ss Glass Window G-1 828 West Overhang PF=0.35 West Glass Window G-1 495 West Overhang PF=0.44 Southwest Gla Window G-1 162 Southwest Overhang PF= 1.11 ss Glass Window G-1 1917 South Overhang PF=0.35 South Glass Window G1 1211 South Overhang PF=0.44 South Glass Window G-1 315 South Overhang PF= 1.11 with 10' overh ang East_Glass Window G-1 477 East Overhang PF= 1.11 East_Glass fo Window G-1 180 East n.a. odcourt doors East Glass_fo Window G-1 550 East Overhang PF= 1.45 odcourt West_Glass_F Window G-1 586 West n.a. ootl Pavilion North Glass_F Window G1 530 North n.a. ood Paviliorr South_Glass Window G-1 530 South n.a. Food Pavilion East_Glass Fo Window G-1 180 East n.a. od Pavilion Total 11403 ASHRAE/IESNA Standard 90.1-2004 05/13/13 �� • ' �' �� " ' � �'� � � � � + Project Name: Paragon Outlets Building 300 Project Address:3965 Eagan Outlets Parkway Eagan,MN Date: 3/4/2013 City: Eagen Zip: 55122 HVAC System Designer of Record:Jeffrey M.Zunt Telephone: 330-659-6688 Contact Person:Jeffrey M.Zunt Telephone: 330-659-6688 Qualification o Exception:An energy recovery O (j)Piping is insulated in accordance with ventilation system is provided in Table 6.8.3.Insu�ation exposed#o weather is o The building is 2 stories or less in height and accordance with the requirements in suitable for outdoor service.Cellular foam has a gross floor area is less than 25,000 ft2. §6,5.6. insulation is protected from water and solar Requirements o (f)The system shail be controlled by a radiation. manual changeover or dual setpoint ❑ Exception;Piping is located within o (a)All systems serve a single HVAC zone. thermostat. manufactured HVAC'units. o (b)Cooling(if any)is provided by a unitary o (g)Heat pumps equipped with auxiliary ❑ (k)Ductwork and plenums are insulated in packaged or split-system air conditioner that internal electric resistance heaters(if any) accordance with Tables 6.8.2A and 6.8.2B is either air-cooled or evaporatively cooled have controls to prevent supplemental heater and<sealed in accordance with Tables and meets the etficiency requirements shown operation when the heating load can be met 6.4.4.2A and 6.4.4.2B. in Table 6.8.1.List equipment in the table by the heat pump alone. below. ❑ (I)Construction documents require air ❑ (h)The system controls do not permit reheat systems to be balanced in accordance with o (c)The system has an air economizer as or any other form of simultaneous heating industry-accepted procedures to within 10% required byTableB.'5.1,with controls as and cooling for humidity control. of design airflow rates. required in Tables 6.5.1.1.3A and 6.5.1.1.36. The economizer has either barometric or o (i)Systems are provided with a time switch O (m)Where separate heating and cooling powered relief sized to prevent that(1)can start and stop the system under equipment serve the same temperature zone, overpressurization of fhe building.Outdoor air different schedules for seven different tlay- thermostats are interlocked to prevent dampers for the economize�use are provided types per week;(2)is capabfe of retaining simultaneous heating and cooling. with blade and jamb seals. programming and time setting during a loss of power for a period of at least 10 h;(3) o (n)Exhausts are equipped with gravity or ❑ Exception:The cooling e�ciency meets includes an accessible manual override that motorized dampers that will automatically or exceeds the efficiency requirement in allows temporary operation of the sysfem for shut when systems are not in use. Table 6.3.2.Document in table below. up to 2 h;(4)is capable of temperature setback down to 55°F during off hours;and � Exception:Design capacity is less than O (d)Heating(if any)shall be provided by a (5)is capable of temperature setup to 90°F 300 cfm. unitary packaged or split-system heat pump, during off hours. o Exception:System operates a fuel-fired furnace,an electric resistance heateror a baseboard system connected to a ❑ Exception:System serves hotel/motel continuously. boiler.All heating equipment meets the guest rooms. o (o)Systerns have optimum start controls. efficiency requirements of the Standard.List ❑ Exception:System operates equipment in table below. o Exception:Supply air capacity is less continuously. than 10,000 cfm. o (e)The outdoor air quantity is less than or ❑ Exception: System has both a cooling equal to 3,000 cfm and less than or 70%0 of or heating capacity less than 15,000 the supply ai�quantity at minimum outdoor air Btulh and a supply fan motor power design conditions. greater than 3/4 hp. Equi ment Efficienc System Mfg.& Equipment Heating Cooling Tag(s) Model Type No. Rated Rated Minimum Rated Rated Minimum Econ. Capacity E�ciency E�ciency Capacity Efficiency Efficiency Min. Efficiency h�p ANSI/ASHRAE/1ESNA Standard 90.1-2004 � � E � � , : � , � ' �, �. . - . . . Project Name:Paragon Outlets Building 300 Project Address: 3965 Eagan Outlets Parkway Eagan,MN Date: 3/4/2013 HVAC System Designer of Record: Jeffrey M.Zunt Telephone: 330-659-6688 Contact Person: Jeffrey M.Zunt Telephone: 330-659-6688 City: Eagen Climate Zone: 6A Zip:55122 ` 1%Summer DB Temp: 91 F 1%Summer WB Temp: 73 F 99.6%Winter Temp: -16 F Mandato Equipment Efficienc Worksheet 6.4.1.1 System Tag Equipment Type(Tables Size Category(Tables Sub-Category or Rating Units of Efficiency Minimum Efficiency(Tables 6.8.1A through G) 6.8.1A through G) Condition(Tables 6.8.1A (Tables 6.8.1A 6.8.1A through G} through G) through G) Rated ? Required 1.5 Ton Air Cond.Air Cooled <65,000 BTU Single Package SEER 13.0 >_ 12,0 2 Ton Air Cond.Air Gooled <65,000 BTU Single Package SEER 13A ? 12,0 3 Ton Air Cond,Air Cooled <65,000 BTU Single Package SEER 15.0 >_ 12.0 5 Ton Air Cond.Air Cooled >65,000 <135,000 Single Package SEER 15.0 ? 12.0 6 Ton Air Cond.Air Cooled >65,000 <135,000 Single Package EER 12.6 >_ 10,3 7.5 Ton Air Cond.Air Cooled >65,000 <135,000 Single Package EER 13.0 >_ 10.3 > Mandato Non-Standard Centrifu al Chiller Worksheet< 6.4.1.1 ' System Tag Leaving CHW Entering CW CondenserFlow Rate Size Category Minimum E�ciency(Tables Temperature(°F) Temperature(°F) (gpm/ton) (Tables 6.8.1H 6.8.1H through J) through J) Rated ? Required > � > > General Mandatory Requirements p� Piping insulation meets or exceeds the Special Mandatory Requirements requirements of the Standard(§6.4.4.1.3). O Load calculations are provided for selection O Freeze protection or snow/ice melting of all equipment and systerns(§6.4.2). m Construction documents require record systems(if any)have controls to prevent ❑ Stair vents,elevator shaft vents,gravity drawings(§6.7.2.1},manuals(§6.7.2.2), operation in warm weather(§6.4.3.7). hoods, ravit vents and ravi ventilations system balancing(§6.72.3}and system g y g ty commissioning(§6.7.2.4). O Independent perimeter heating systems(if are provided with motorized dampers. any)comply with the control requirements of o Exception:Gravity dampers are used §6.4.3.1.1 and§6.4:3.2. since the building is less than 3 stories o Independent heaGng and cooling thermostatic or in climate zones 1 3. controls(if any)are interlocked to prevent O Exception:No vents are required as crossover of set points(§6.4.3.2). these systems ventilate unconditioned zones. �i�p 0 ANSI/ASHRAE/IESNA Standard 90.1-2004 � �' E � � s € � • '� . ' �;' � . .:. • ' . Project Name: Paragon Outlets Building 300 Contact Person:Jeffrey M.Zunt Telephone: 330-659-6688 S stems Worksheet 6.4 System Tag 1.5 Ton 2 Ton 3 Ton 5 Ton 6 Ton 7.5 Ton Supply CFM 600 800 1200 2000 2400 3000 Supply ESP(in.w.c.) �� , �„ �„ �,� �„ Fan System HP 1/8 1/4 1A 1.0 1.0 3J5 OA GFM(i.e.Outdoor Air CFM) 50 60 240 400 480 600 Automatic Shutdown(§6.4.3.2.1) C1 C1 C1 C1 C1 C1 Deadband(§6.4.3.1.2) N2 N/A N2 N/A N2 N/A N2 N/A N2 N/A N2 N/A Setback Controls(§6.4.3.23) C1 C1 C1 C1 C1 C1 Setup Controls(§6.4.3.2.2) C1 C1 C1 C1 C1 C1 Optimum Start(§6.4.3.1.3) N3 N/A N3 N/A N3 N/A N3 N/A N3 N/A N3 N/A Zone Isolation(§6.4.3.1.4) N3 N/A N3 N/A N3 N/A N3 N/A N3 N/A N3 N/A Shutoff Dampers(§6.4.3.3.3) C2 C2 C2 C2 C2 G2 Heat Pump Aux Heat(§6.4.3.4) N1 N/A N1 N/A N1 N/A N9 N/A N1 N/A N1 N/A Humidifier Preheat(§6.4.3.5) N1 N/A N1 N/A N1 N/A N1 N/A N1 N/A N1 N/A Humidification/Dehumidification Deadband(§6.4.3.6) N1 N/A N1 N/A N1 N/A N1 N/A N1 N/A N1 N/A Ventilation Control(§6.4.3.8) N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Duct/Pienum insulation(§6.4.42.1) C1 C1 C1 C1 C1 C1 Duct Sealing Levels(§6.4.4.2.1)8upplylRetum A A A A A A Duct Leakage Test(§6.4.4.2.2) Y Y Y Y Y Y In the table above,enter the appropriate codes Setup Controls Heat Pump Aux Heat from this list: . C1 Setup provided(up to 90F) • C1 Complying controls provided Shutdown • N1 N/A continuous operation • N1 N/A system is not a heat pump • Cl Complying nonresidential time switch ' N2 N/A�15 kbtu/h or Gi/4 hp • N2 N/A auxiliary is not electric or is not with override • N3 N/A 1%Sum DB<=100F provided . C2 Complying residential time switch with • N4 N/A no cooling • N3 N/A heat pump covered by NAECA override Optimum Start Humidifier Preheat • N1 N/A continuous operation . C1 Optimum start provided • C1 Complying controls provided • N2 N/A s15 kbfu/h or Q/4 hp . N9 N/A continuous operation • N9 N/A no humidi�er • N3 N/A hotel/motel guestroom . N2 N/A s15 kbtu/h or G3/4 hp N3 N/A su 1 <-10,000 cfm Humidification/Dehumidification Dead Band Dead Band � pP y . Ct;Gomptying controls provided • C>Dual setpoinf control Shutoff Dampers • N1 N/A no humidification and/or • G2 Manualchange over control . C1 Motorized shutoff dampers on OA and dehumidification • N1 N/A special occupancy{requires Exh DucUPlenum insulation approval) . C2 Gravity shutoff dampers on OA and Exh • N2 N/A heating or cooling only . N1 N/A continuous operation • Ci Complying insu/afion provided N2 N/A_<15 kbtu/h or�i/4 h • N1 N/A all ducts located in conditioned Setback Controls ' p space • C1 Setback provided(down to 55F) • N3 N/A OA/EA<=300 cfm Duct Sealin • N9 N/A continuous operation Zone Isolation g • N2 N/,4 Si5 kbtu/h or Q/4 h • Enterhighest seal level(A,B or C)for P • C1/so/ation zones provided supply and return • N3 N/A 99.6%Win DB>40F . N1 N/A confinuous operation • N4 N/A radianf heating . N2 N/A_<15 kbtu/h or Ci/4 hp Duct Leakage Test • N5 N/A no heating . N3 N/A aN zones on same schedule • Y Ducts will be tested for leakage • N4 N/A OA/EA<=5,000 cfm • N Ducts wili not be tested for leakage y�p 0 ANSI/ASHRAE/IESNA Standard 90.1-2004 � � E � � o "� � � �� :� �' � ° �� ,• Project Name: Paragon 0utlets Building 300 Contact Person: Jeffrey M.Zunt Telephone: 330-659-6688 Prescriptive Checkiist heat addition and loop heat rejection(if any) Prescriptive Economizers(§6.5.1) Specify economizer exemptions: comply with the requirements of§6.5.2.2.3. m Systems employ airside economizers ❑ System pumps greaterthan 10 hp employ (§6.5.1.1). variable flow controls(§6.5.4.1},pump � Economizer provides up to 100%design isolation(§6.5.4.2)and temperature reset airFlow in outdoor air(§6,5.1.1.1). Prescriptive Air-System Requirements (§6.5.4.3). � Economizer is integ�ated with the mechanical o Simultaneous Heating and Cooling Prescriptive Special System Requirements cooling system(§6.5.1.1.2 and§6.5.1.3}. (§6.5.2.3). ' o Ali heat rejection equipment with motors>7.5 � Economizer high limit shutoff complies with � Zone minimums were set to meet the hp employ controls that comply with§6.5.5. §6.5.1.1.3. requirements of Standard 62. ❑ Exhaust Air Energy Recovery:all fan systems � Economizer dampers meet or exceed � Zone minimums were set to<_OA cfm/ft2 of that have both a design supply capacity of>_ leakage requirements(§6.5.1.1.4). zone conditioned floor area. 5,000 cfm and a minimum outdoor air supply a ❑ Zone minimums are less than 300 cfm. of>_70%of the design supply air employ an � System provides relief for up to 100/o design energy recovery system that complies with airflow in outdoor air(§6.5.1.1.5). ❑ Other(requires special documentation and §6.5.6.1. � Economizer complies with the heating system approval). o Heat recovery for service water heating is impact requirements(§6.5.1.4). O Humidity controls(if any)comply with the provided for facilities that operate ❑ Systems employ waterside economize�s. requirements of'§6.5.2.3. continuously,have a total water-cooled heat rejection capacity exceeding 6,000,000 btu/h, ❑ Economizer can provide 100%of the load at o Systems that employ hydronic cooling and and have a design service water heating load either the outdoor conditions of 50°F db/45°F have humidification(if any)use a waterside exceeding 1,000,000 btu/h.The heat wb or 45°F db/40°F wb where re uired for economizer that complies with 6.5,1. 4 § recovery system(if any)complies with dehumidification purposes(§6.5.1.2.1). ❑ Variable air volume fan contro�s comply with §6.5.6.2. 0 Precooling coils and heat exchangers have the requirements of§6.5.3.2. ❑ Kitchen hoods with exhaust flows>5000 cfm either a<_15 ft of WC pressure drop or are comply with the requirements of§6.5.7.1. Prescriptive Water-System Requirements bypassed when economizer is not in use(§ o Fume hoods with a total exhaust s stem flow 6.5.1.22). O Three-pipe systems are not used(§ >15,000 cfm comply with the requ rements of 6.5.2.2.1). m Economizer is integrated with the mechanical §6.5.7.2. cooling system`(§6.5.1.3). ❑ Two-pipe changeover heating/cooling o Radiant heaters:complying with§6.5.8.1 are systems(if any)comply with the m Economizer complies with the heating system used to heat unenciosed spaces(if any). impact requirements(§6.5.1.4). requirements of§6.52.2.2. ❑ Hydronic(ground-or water-loop)heat pump o The cooling'equipment with hot-gas bypass ❑ Systems are exempt from the economizer controls(if any}meets the unlaading re uirements. systems that have equipment for both loop q requirements of§6.5.9. h��p 0 ANSI/ASHRAE/IESNA Standard 90.1-2004 � d E � � � ' • �� s � , �.. Project tvame: Paragon Outlets Buiiding 300 Contact Person: Jeffrey M.Zunt Telephone: 330-659-66$8 Complete one worksheet for each fan system > 5hp Prescripti�e:Fan Power Limitations 6.5.3.1 Supply Fan Retum Fan Exhaust Fan Series-Style Fan-Powered Total System ` Box Motor(hp) Tag Supply CFM Motor(hp) Tag Motor(hp) Tag Motor(hp) Tag Motor(hp) �Total Supply CFM Total System Motor HP� Table 6. . e hp(cfm Total Supply CFM X cfm Gonstant + 1,000 � . HP Allowance = hp(=Value X CFM/1000) � Credits and/or adjustments'� Adjusted HP Allowance"` hp(see§6.5.3.1) >_ •Attach calculations and documentation if credits or temperature adjustments are used.Refer to§6.5.3.1 for the formulas Credits and adjustments are available for the following: • Clean filter pressure drops in excess of 1 in,w.c.; • Pressure drop due to heat recovery coi/s or tlevices or evaporative cooling equipment or devices; • Relief fans that operate during peak cooling due'to high ventilation rates;and • Room to cooling airsupply temperature differences that are greaterthan 20°F(e.g.low temperature supply). h�p 0 ANSI/ASHRAE/IESNA Standard 90.1-2004 � � � � c � � �'; [ i � � � � .� � � Project Name: Paragon Outlets Building 300 Projecf Address:3965 Eagan Outlets Parkway Eagan, MN Date: 3/4/2013 City: Eagen Zip: 55122 HVAC System Designer of Record:Jeffrey M.Zunt Telephone:330-659-6688 Contact Person:Jeffrey M.Zunt Telephone: 330-659-6688 QU81ifIC8t1011 � Exception:An energy recovery ❑ Q)Piping is insulated in accordance with ventilation system is provided in Table 6.8.3.Insulation exposed to weather is ❑ The building is 2 stories or less in height and accordance with the requirements in suitable for outdoor service.Cellular foam has a gross floor area is less than 25,000 ft2. §6.5.6. insulation is protected from water antl solar radiation. Requirements ❑ (f)The system shail be controiled by a manual changeove�or dual setpoint ❑ Exception:Piping is located within o (a)Ap systems serve a single HVAC zone. thermostat. manufiactured HVAC units. o (b)Cooling(if any)is provided by a unitary ❑ (g)Heafi pumps equipped with auxiliary o (k)Duetwork and plenums are insulated in packaged or split-system air conditioner that internal electric resistance heaters(if any) accordance with Tables 6,8.2A and 6.8.26 is either air-cooled or evaporatively cooled have controls to p�event supplemental heater and sealed in accordance with Tables and meets the efficiency requirements shown operatiion when the heating load can be met 6.4.4.2A and 6.4.42B. in Table 6.8.1.List equipment in the table by the heat pump alone. below. ❑ (I}Construction documents require air o (h)The system controls do not permit reheat systems to be balanced in accordance with o (c)The system has an air economizer as or any other form of simultaneous heating industry-accepted procedures to within 10% required by Table 6.5.1,with controls as and coolingfor humidity control. of design airtiow rates. required in Tables 6.5.1.1.3A and 6.5:1.1.3B. The economizer has either barometric or o (i)Systems are providetl with a time switch o (m)Where separate heating and cooling powered relief sized to prevent that(1)can start and stop the system under equipment serve the same temperature zone, overpressurization of the building.Outdoor air different schedules for seven different day- thermostats are interlocked to p�event dampers for the economizer use a�e provided types per week;(2)is capable of retaining simultaneous heating and cooling. with blade and jamb seals. programming and time setting during a loss of power for a period of at least 10 h;(3) � (n)Exhausts are equipped with gravity or o Exception:The cooling:efficiency meets includes an accessible manual override that motorized dampers that will automatically or exceeds the efficiency requirement in allows temporary operation of the system for shut when systems a�e hot in use. Table 6.3.2.Document in table below. up to 2 h;(4)is capable of temperature setback down to 55°F during off hours;and o Exception:Design capacity is less than o (d)Heating(if any)shall be provided by a (5)is capable of temperature setup to 90°F 300 cfm. unitary packaged or split-system heat pump, during offhours. o Exception:System operates a fuel-fired furnace,an electric resistance heater or a baseboard system connected to a ❑ Exception:System serves hotel/motel continuously. boiler.All heating equipment meets the guest rooms. ❑ (o)Systems have optimum start controls. efficiency requirements of the Standard.List ❑ Exception:System operates equipment in tablebelow. continuously. ❑ Exception:Supply air capacity is less o e The outdoor air uanti than 10,000 cfm. O q ty is less than or ❑ Exception: System has both a cooling equal to 3,000 cfm and less than or 70%of or heating capacity less than 15,000 the supply air quantity at minimum outdoor air Btu/h and a suppiy fan motor power design conditions. greater than 3/4 hp. E uipment Efficienc System Mfg.& Equipment Heating � Cooling Tag(s) Model Type No. Rated Rated Minimum Rated Rated Minimum Econ. Capacity E�ciency Efficiency Capacity E€ficiency Efficiency Min. Efficiency N � 0 ANSI/ASHRAEJIESNA Standard 90.1-2004 � d�� :� . • . �� f;� � � � „� . Project Name:Paragon Outlets Building 300 ProjectAddress: 3965 Eagan Outlets Parkway Eagan,MN Date: 3/4/2013 HVAC System Designe�of Record: Jeffrey M.Zunt Telephone::330-659-6688 Contact Person: Jeffrey M.Zunt Tefephone: 330-659-6688 City: Eagefl Climate Zone: 6A Zip:55122 1%Summer DB Temp:91 F 1%Summer WB Temp: 73 F 99;6%Winter Ternp; -16 F Mandato Equipment E�cien.c Worksheet 6.4.1 1 System Tag Equipment Type(Tables Size Category(Tables Sub-Gategory or Rating Units of E�ciency Minimum E�ciency(Tables 6.8.1Athrough G) 6.8.1Athrough G) Condition(Tables8.8.1A (Tables 6.8.1A 6.8.1Athrough G) th�ough G) th�ough G) Rated >_ Required 8;5 Ton Air Cond.Air Cooled >65,000 <135,000 Single Package EER 13.0 >_ 10.3 10 Ton Air Cond.Air Cooled >65,000 <135,000 Single Package EER 12.5 >_ 10.3 15 Ton Air Cond.Air Cooled >135,000 <180,000 Single Package EER 12.0 >_ 9.7 > > > > Mandato Non-Standard Centrifu aI Chiller Worksheet 6.4.1.1 System Tag Leaving CHW Entecing CW Condenser Flow Rate Size Category Minimum Efficiency(Tables Temperature(°F) Temperature(°F) (gpm/ton) (Tables 6.8.1H 6.8.1H through J) through J) Rated >_ Required > > > > General Mandatory Requirements � Piping insulation meets or exceeds the Special Mandatory Requirements requirements of the Standard(§$.4.4.1.3). o Load calculations are provided for selection ❑ Freeze protection or snow/ice melting of all equipment and systems{§6.42). � Construction documents require record systems(if any)have controls to prevent o Stair vents,elevator shaft vents,gravity drawings(§6.7.2.1),manuals(§6.7.2.2}, operation in warm weathe�(§6.4.3.7). system balancing(§6.7.2.3)and system hoods,gravity vents and gravity ventilations commissioning(§6.7.2.4). o Independent perimeter heating systems(if are provided with motorized tlampers: any)comply with`the control requirements of o Exception:Gravity dampers are used §6.4.3.1.1 and§6.4.32. since the building is less than 3 stories o Independent heating and coofing thermostatic or in climate zones 1-3. controls(if any)are interlocked to prevent o Exception:No vents are required as crossover of set points(§6.4.3.2). these systems ventilate unconditioned zones. h�4 a ANSI/ASHRAEIIESNA Standard 90.1-2004 � d E � ,:� �. � �� • '� • �: �.':� � . , � r':• ' Project Name: Paragon Outlets Building 300 Contact Person:Jeffrey M.Zunt Telephone: 330-659-6688 S stems Worksheet 6.4 System Tag 8.5 Ton 10 Ton 15 Ton Supply CFM 3800 4000 6000 Supply ESP(in.w.c.) �� ^ Fan System HP 3.75 3.75 3.0 OA CFM(i.e.Outdoor Air CFM) 760 800 1200 Automatic Shutdown.(§6.4.3.2.1) C1 C1 G1 Deadband(§6.4.3.1.2) N2 N/A N2 N/A N2 N/A Setback Gontrols(§6.4.3.2.2) C1 C1 C1 Setup Controls(§6.4.3.2.2) C1 C1 C1 Optimum Start(§6.4.3.1.3) N3 N/A N3 N/A N3 N/A Zone Isolation(§6.4.3.1.4) N3 N/A N3 N/A N3 N/A Shutoff Dampers(§6.4.3.3.3) C2 C2 C2 Heat Pump Aux Heat(§6.4.3.4) N1 N/A N1 N/A N1 N/A " Humidifier Preheat(§6.4:3.5) N1 N/A N1 N/A N1 N/A Humidification/Dehumidification Deadband(§6.4.3.6) N1 N/A N1 N/A N1 N/A Ventilation Control(§6.4.3.8) ' N/A N/A N/A Duct/Plenum Insulation(§6.4.4.2.1) C1 C1 C1 Duct Sealing Levels(§6.4.4.2.1)Supply/Return A A A A A A Duct Leakage Test(§6.4.4.2.2) Y Y Y Y Y Y In the table above;enter the appropriate codes Setup Controls Heat Pump Aux Heat from this list: . C1 Setup provided(up to 90F) • C9 Complying controls provided Shutdown • N1 N/A continuous operation . N1 N/A system is not a heat pump C1 Complying nonresidential time swifch ' N2 N/A_<15 kbtu/h or Ql4 hp . N2 N/A auxiliary is not electric or is not • wifh override • N3 N/A 1%Sum DB<=100F provided . C2 Complying residential time switch with ' N4 N//i no cooling • N3 N/A heat pump covered by NAECA override Optimum Start Humidifier Preheat • N9 N/A continuous operation . C9 Optimum start provided • C1 Complying controls provided • N2 N/A_<15 kbtu/h or C3/4 hp . N1 N/A continuous operation • N1 N/A no humidifier • N3 N/A hotel/motel guestroom . N2 N/A_<15 kbtu/h or-�i/4 hp • N3 N/A su 1 <-10,000 cfm Humidification/Dehumidification Dead Band Dead Band ppy . C1 Complying controls provided • C1 Dual setpoint control Shutoff Dampers • N1 WA no humidifrcation and/or • C2 Manual change over control . C9 Motorized shutofi dampers on OA and dehumidification • Nl N/A special occupancy(requires Exh approval) � Duct/Plenum Insulation C2 Gravity shutoff dampers on OA and Exh C1 Com I �n �n p • N2 N/A heating or cooling only . N9 N/A continuous operation ' PY� 9� sulation rovided N2 N/q_<15 kbtu/h or c3/4 h • N1 N/A all ducts located in conditioned Setback Controis • N3 N/A OA/EA<=300 cfm p space • Ct Setback provided(down fo 55F) � Ducf Sealin • N1 N/A continuous operation Zone Isolation 9 • N2 N/A_<15 kbtu/h or Gi/4 hp . C1 Isolation zones provided • Enter highest seai level(A,8 or C)for • N3 N/,4 99.6%Win DB>40F � supply and retum N1 N/.4 continuous operation • N4 N/A ratliant heating . N2 N/A_<15 kbtu/h or Q/4 hp Duct Leakage Test • N5 N/,4 no heating . N3 N/A all zones on same schedule • Y Ducts will Be tesfed forleakage • N4 N/A OA/EA<=5,000 cfm • N Ducts will not be tested for leakage H p 0 ANSI/ASHRAE/IESNA Standard 90.1-2004 � �� •. � � � - . � � � � .. � . • - Project Name: Paragon Outlets Building S00 Contact Person: Jeffrey M.Zunt Telephone: 330-659-6688 Prescriptive Checklist heat addition and loop heat rejection{if any) Prescriptive Economizers(§6.5.1) Specify economizer exemptions: comply with the requirements of§6.5.2.2.3. m Systems employ airside economizers ❑ System pumps greater than 1 O hp employ (§6.5.1.1): variable flow controls(§6.5.4.1),pump � Economizer provides up to 100%design isolation(§6.5.4.2}and tempe�ature reset airflow in oufdoor air(§8.5.1.1.1). Prescriptive AirSystem Requirements (§6.5.4.3). � Economizer is integrated with the mechanical o Simultaneous Heating and Cooling Prescriptive Special System Requirements cooling system(§6,5.1.1.2 and§6.5.1.3). (§6.5.2.3). ❑ All heat rejection equipment with motors>7.5 � Economizer high limit shutoff complies with � Zone minimums were set to meet the hp employ controls that comply with§6.5.5. §6.5.1.1.3. requirements of Standard 62. ❑ Exhaust Air Energy Recovery:ali fan systems � Economizer dampers meet or exceed ❑ Zone minimums were set to<_0.4 cfm/ft2 of that have both a design supply capacity of? leakage requirements(§6.5.1.1.4). zone conditioned floor area. 5,000 cfm and a minimum outdoor air supply o ❑ Zone minimums are less than 300 cfm. of>_70%of the design supply air employ an � System provides relief forup to 100%design ene�gy recovery system that complies with airflow in outdoor air(§6.5.1.1.5): ❑ Other(requires special documentation and §6.5.6.1. � Economizer complies with the heating system approval). O Heat recovery for service water heating is impact requirements(§6.5.1.4). ❑ Humidity controls(if any)comply with the provided for facilities that operate o Systems employ waterside economizers. requirements of§6.5.2.3. continuously,have atotal wate�-cooled heat rejection capacity exceeding 6,000,000 btu/h, ❑ Economizer can provide 400%of the load at � Systems that employ hydronic cooling and and have a design service water heating load either the outdoor conditions of 50°F db/45°F have humidification(if any)use a waterside exceeding 1,000,000 btu/h.The heat wb or 45°F db/40°F wb where re uired for economizer that complies with 6.5.1. q § recovery system(if any)complies with dehumidification purposes(§6.5.1.2.1). O Variable air volume fan controls comply with §6.5.6.2. ❑ Precooling coils and heat exchangershave the requirements of§6.5.3.2. O Kitchen hoods with exhaust flows>5000 cfm either a<_15 ft of WC pressure drop or are comply with the requirements of§6.5.7.1. Prescriptive Water-System Requirements bypassed when economizer is not in use(§ ❑ Fume hoods with a total exhaust system flow 6.5.1.2.2). ❑ Three-pipe systems are not used(§ >�5,000 cfm comply with the requirements of 6.5.2.2.1). m Economizer is integrated with the mechanical §6.5.72. cooling system(§6.5.1.3). ❑ Two-pipe changeover heating/cooling O Radiant heaters complying with§6.5.8.1 are systems(if any)comply with the m Economizer complies with the heating system used to heat unenciosed spaces(if any). impact requirements(§6.5.1.4). requirements of§6.5.2.2.2. ❑ Hydronic(ground-or water-loop)heat pump o The cooling equipment with hot-gas bypass ❑ Systems are exempt from the economizer controls(if any)meets the unloading systems that have equipment for both loop requirements. requirements of§6.5.9. ��p 0 ANSI/ASHRAE/IESNA Standard 90.1-2004 � � E � �, � s' . - - � > _ �, � , � ' �. . . •- Pro�ect Name: Paragon Outlets Building 300 Contact Person: Jeffrey M. Zunt Te►ephone: 330-659-6688 Complete one worksheet for each fan system >5hp Prescriptive fan Power Limitations 6.5.3.1 Supply Fan Retum Fan Exhaust Fan Series-Style Fan-Powered Total System Box Motor(hp) Tag Supply CFM Motor(hp) Tag Motor(hp) ` Tag Motor(hp) Tag Motor(hp) FTotal Supply CFM Total System Motor HP� Table 6. . . e hplcfm Total Supply CFM X cfm Gonstant r 1,000 � HP Allowance = hp(=Value X CFMl1000) z Credits andlor adjustments'� Adjusted HP Allowance" hp(see§6.5.3.1) z 'Attach calculations and documentation if credits or temperature adjustments are used.Refer to§6.5.3.1 for the formulas Credits and adjustments are available for the following: • Clean filter pressure drops in excess of 1 in.`w.c.; • Pressure drop due to heat recovery coils or devices or evaporative cooling equipment or devices; • Relief fans that operate during peak cooling due to high ventilation rafes;and • Room to cooling air supply temperature differences that are'greater than 20°F(e.g.low temperature supply). �i�p 0 ANSI/ASHRAE/IESNA Standard 90.1-2004 � d � � BUILDING 300 �; ; � � __ � • • � • . . � f� � � � ��- ;�� , . � . _ o � w . , � � _ :: �.�., � n � , . . - � Project tvame: PARAGON OUTLETS AT CEDAR GROVE ', _ � ProjectAddress; TB� Date: 3.4.2��3 I �eSi9nerotRecord: JEFFREY MITERKO Te�epho�e: 330.659.6688 Contact Person:GREG SUTYAK Telephone:330.659.6688 c�ty: EAGAN, MINNESOTA Mandatory Provisions Checklisf Automatic lighting shutoff controls are provided 0 Each space enclosed by ceiling-height ❑ Two-larnp tandem-wiredballasts. based on either a scheduling`device ar an partitions has an independent,accessible occupant sensor. control that operates general lighting in the � Display lighting has a separate controL ❑ Exce tion: S ace is intended fo�24- space. P p ❑ Case lighting has a separate control. hour operation. ❑ Exception: The control is located in a remote location for safe or securi � Hotel/motel guest rooms have a master ❑ Exception: Space is smaller than 5,000 reasons: � ry switch at the main entry. ftz. ❑ Exception: Space fo�patient ca�e. ❑ For spaces less than or equal to 1D,000 ft2,a � Task lighting has a separate control, separate space control is provided for each ❑ Nonvisual lighting has a separate control. 2;500 ft2 of area ❑ Exception: Space where automatic 2 ❑ Demonstration lighting has a separate ❑ For spaces more than 10,000 ft,a separate lighting shutoff would endanger safety or control: : space control is provided for each 10,000 ft2 secunty. of area. � Exit signs do not exceed 5 W per#ace. ❑ Either a photosensor or an astronomical time ❑ Exterior building,gcounds luminaires greater switch controls exterior lighting applications. than 100 W have lamps with minimum ' ❑ Exception: Lights must remain on for efficacy of 60 lumenslW, safety,security or eye adaptation ❑ Exception` Luminaire is activated with a reasons: motion sensor. Interior Li htin PowerAllowance Buildin Area Method Building Lighting Power Density Building Area Lighting Power Aliowance TYPe (W/ft2) (ft=) (V1I) Total Inferior Li htin Power Allowance Space-b -S ace Method Building CommonlSpecific Lighting Power Density Space Area Lighting Power Allowance TYPe Space Type (W/ft2) (ftz) M�) °�i��FO°�P?EP 1.1 / 1.3 1093 / 424 1202.3 / 508.8 DININGFAMILY' 2.1 8443 17730.3 RESTROOM 0.9 2114 1902.6 . CORRIDOR o:5 ' s3t5 2657.5 ELECT/MECH 1:5 520 780A � . . . . . . � STORAGE � � O.S�.. .. 101 . � .. 8O.$... . . . . � . � CONFERENCE/LOBBY��' 1.3�� .. � . . . �b58 �. . . . � :725A ��. . . ... . _ Totai ;25587.7 h�p o. ANS1/ASHRAE/IESNA Standard 90.1-2004 � d � � � , • • � . � � " �"e • ; � ,.�,. ' Pro�ect Name: PARAGON OUTLETS AT CEDAR GROVE co�tact Perso�s GREG SUTYAK Te�ePnone: 330.659.6688 Interior Connected Li htin Power TyPe.,. . ID Luminaire Description � < �� „Y. Number of Watts/ Total (including number'of lamps per fixture,watts per lamp,type of � �� Luminaires Luminaire Watts ballast,type offixture) ' � �. �a��. � ' � o� " �� m � �° m;� �ar� " u, o � � �� , A �� u. ��;T� � � O �� '�:� � ,�° � � HIGH ABUSE,2-32W T8,ELECTRONIC 0�� Q �„ 0 37 60 2220 $B 4`INDUSTRIAL,2-32W T8,ELECTRONIC !��(� �'�Q ��Q 13 60 780 �� :, � � � DD DOWNUGHT,2-32W CFL �� Q ��Q 10 65 650 EE 2x2 INDIRECT,3-17W T8,ELECTRONIC 0�0 ��0 ��0 79 60 1140 fF 2z4 INDIRECT,332W T8,ELECTRONIC Q�� Q ��Q 15 96 1440 �� ..s� �I :FF1 � 2x4 INDIRECT,2-32W TS,�ELECTRONIC � � � � � � �� . Q ��Q �' Q 17 60 1020 �F2 � 2z4 INDIRECT,.3-32W T6,ELECTRONIC � � . .. . � � ::�:�(�,..�� O 1 . � 96 � . �6 I F2 DOWNLIGHT;132W CFL (�� Q ��Q 15 36 540 A 2z2 LAYIN,3-17W T8,ELECTRONIC '(�: .� ��Q Q 4 60 240 S 6"RECESSED,2-32W TS PER 4',ELECTRONIC '� °(� ''��Q � -tt fl 216 60l4' 3240 5ub-Total 11366 Additional Interior Li htin PowerAllowance COt1t'd on page 2b TYPe Space ID Space Name �� `�' Area(ftz) Unit Allowance Allowance Luminaire Installed : �,�' (W/ftZ) (W) ID's Power�W) -; €��~ .c': �� 3 > a, �,. �� r: x.?� �' ��' �� p �arn�, � � �� 0 � .. � ��0 �� 0 �� a�a �� O O� � Q��O ��;� �t x�0 �� y�p ANSI/ASHRAE/IESNA Standard 90.1-2004 � � � � • ' �` � � � � 1 �. " � �.; ; . �:� . >i Pro�ect►varne: pqRqGON OIJTLETS AT CEDAR GROVE contact Person; GREG SUTYAK Te�epnooe: 330:659.6688 Interior Connected Li htin Power Type � �ID Luminaire Description� � � � �� -�'�� v� � Number of Wattsl � Total� (including number of lamps per fixture,watts per lamp,rype of �� s m �� Luminaires Luminaire Watts ballast,type of fixture) �`� ��`�'� � t-� ��. � � �`�* a�i "�;��' m m�� n„� �d�; rVn ;�� o o�..�. . . � � ��` O �a � d � � �,. � . �� " �. �n�� :C �p�.:� . � . . '�`�"'� :W ��-..�.J �J��O . . g PENDANT, 1 25W°T8,ELEGTRONIG Q��'.�� O �T O 33 30' 99� C PENDANT,2-32W CFL,ELECTRONIC s�� ,�`� 65 � -� � 0 �a�0 38 2470 D PENDANT,4-32W CFL,ELECTRONIG 0��, �O�wO ��O 2 130 260 � PENDANT, 1 26W CFL,ELECTRONIC Q�� OO�;O ` ;O 4 30 120 H WALL MOUNT,1-26W CFL,ELECTRONIC Q�''� �O�'`�O �-. O 16 30 480 � ¢� - __�< � � WALL MOUNT,2-26W CFL;ELECTRONIC O�.�� '� O ��`O 2 60 120 ' �� :K WALL MOUNT,2-40W CFL;ELECTRONIC °'��` `�_� C__�� C��O �,�0 10 95 950 N DOWNLIGHT, 1-100W MH,'ELECTRONIC ��`.:O ��O �,��,�O 21 130 2730 P DOWNLIGHT,1-39W MH,€LECTRONIC ;0�0' ��;Q �"` , � ,2g 45 1260 ��O ��O �fl�Q Page 2a 11366 Total 20746 Additional Interior Li,' htin Power-All,owance TYpe �� ;<. Space ID Space Name � �>� Area(ft2) Unit Allowance Allowance Luminaire Installed � � = m�p � ,��, (WJft2) (W) ID's Power(W) m�� -�a�"; � � � �� `��s ��°' �I �n ��sa,. ��`v '� F �� =w� p �mF?�' °� > ��< � �"��? � �,�' � � � � � � � 0�0 �� CO�O �O� O�O �O� ��0 �� O�O ��< �M��O ��.. - � � ��; ��0 �,� ��O ,�J�. � o p ANSUASHRAE/IESNA Standard 90.1-2004 ��,� , ,. � � `, ° �� ' � ` � ' '� :.. ��; �. � � , ° � �_ � ' ' . �_?�� Project Name: PARAGON OUTLETS AT CEDAR`GROVE Contact Person: C�fZEG SUTYAK Telephone: 330.659.6688 Additional Interior Connected Li htin :Power TYPe ID Luminaire Description ' �� Number of Watts/ Total (including number of-lamps per fixtute,watts per lamp,type Y�� to� Lurninaires Luminaire Watts of ballast,type of fixture) �`�� '° �,s: �� ' �� '-�� '�� m .cc� �� uvi ��4� o ro��" �c� �o �`-�� a>i �;�'� a� �°i'� o c o�? -� .� tL �� J �� 0 O�O ��O O�O O�O O�0 ��O �,��O '��O Q,�O r� �� C7:��0 „�... 0 ��;0 ��0 ��0 ��0 �� O ��O �O�O' ��0 �,O��O �0�0 m�O ��O �'��O � 0��0 ��O ��O Total" �o�p ANSI/ASHRAE/IESNA Standard 90.1-2004 � E � � Special Structural Testing & Inspection Program Summary Schedule Project Name Paragon Outlets Cedar Grove Project# 12021 Location 3965 Eagan Outlets Parkway, Eagan, MN Permit# (1) (Building 300) Technical 2) Description (3) Type of Specific Report Assigned Firm (6) Section Article Inspection (4) Frequency(5) 1704.3 Steel Constr. Mat'I Verification SI -S Periodic High Strength Boltin SI -S Periodic Welding SI -S Continuous 1704.4 Conc. Constr. Reinf. Steel SI -S Periodic Anchor Bolts SI -S Continuous Design Mix SI -S Periodic Strength Test SI -S Continuous Placement SI -S Continuous Curing SI -S Periodic formwork SI -S Periodic 1704.5 Masonry Constr. Inspection SI -S Periodic Prior to Grout SI -S Periodic Grout Placement SI -S Continuous Grout/Mortar Pris SI -S Continuous Constr. Doc./Submi al SI -S Periodic Compliance 1704.7 Soils Subgrade SI -S Periodic Excavations SI -S Periodic Controlled Fill SI -S Periodic Placement of Fill Sl-S Continuous Subgrade Prep. SI -S Periodic Note:This schedule shall be filled out and included in a Special Structural Testing and Inspection Program. (If not otherwise specified, assumed program will be "Guidelines for Special Inspection & Testing'' as contained in the State Building Code and as modified by the Sfate adopted IBC. *A complete specification-ready program can be downloaded directly by visiting CASE/MN at www.cecm.orq. 1. Permit number to be provide by the Building Official 2. Referenced to the specific technical scope section in the program 3. Use descriptions per IBC Chapter 17, as adopted by MN State Building Code. 4. Special Inspector-Technical (SIT); Special Inspector-Structural (SiS) 5. Weekly, monthly, per tesUinspection, per floor, etc. 6. Name of firm contracted to perform services Acknowiedgements (Each appropriate representative shall sign below) Owner Firm Paragon Outlets Eagan LLC. Date ¢/2� �3 Contractor � �1 Firm Ryan Companies US, Inc. Date 5 N��3 Architect Firm Dal Pos Architects, LLC. Date� � SER Firm Thorson Baker&Associates Date �/ � SI-S �' � � Firm Braun Intertec, Inc. Date s/�� TA ; -�� Firm Braun Intertec, Inc. Date `r�� /-3 F � Firm Linco Companies Date S- Z�� If requested by Engineer/Architect of Record or Building Official, the individual names of all prospective Special Inspectors and the work they intend to observe shall be identified as an attachment. Leqend SER=Structural Engineer of Record SI-T=Special Inspector-Technical TA=Testing Agency F = Fabricator SI-S =Special Inspector-Structural Accepted for the Building Division By Date BCSD-PR019 4/03 i � Special Inspector Final Report Date: To City or County of: Attention: Street Address: City: State: Zip Code: RE: Final Project Report Project Name: Address: To Whom it May Concern: This is to certify that I perFormed special inspections on the following portions of the work at the above address which required continuous inspection, and which I was employed to inspect: Based on my personal observation and written reports of this work, it is my judgment that the inspected work was performed, to the best of my knowledge, in accordance with the approved plans, specifications, and the applicable workmanship provisions of the Uniform Building Code. Sincerely, Special Inspector's Signature Date Print full name ID Number cc: Client/Owner Architect/Engineer r---- � .� ' � `. '� &��., � . �tti "('�.� �� ,^.y,�y ...��.�� ., �n+ ��' � � �i•f�V � ,r. ��' .. i�.�. � 4$Z i r� �'}y' ,.�i '" �. � � ;I`€+ � � " ,<' 'r`' ,�,y, "`��' ��`�/ ..r� �• � ��,,_,,� � , `�' '� ��ti �z � . �� id-�., . �. o-, - , . l ��' � i �� •. , }Y`' ' � '� v°X • $h,( � • .+ f� �� Y � *jA��j ' ' �_ f � � ji. .� `�h � '.:8 i� i y{ � �;�i'.��, i � ' � � � `�:F ^�-• �(.�Y � �._ ��t t E`�£ � � �S � '� � �.� `.� �� : � < �o7R �a t 1,�S*S 3 �" ' s`' _ N c',��. `� ' 'to. �. �,.5 ; ' .. � . ="' , � �( ' j' m . � �t t 4 c• �rw, � �` r' ' `° � 3 k" �- , , . , s �,. ,. :�, � ��c .�;:_ � . .` ' , - r�� .�""� ��r. a w � }� + ; ,e��m� � .�, 5� � �+ ' ' r �„��`:'`w J - , t � �, s F t / � �.`� 1r w.i3 v . +i�s '� � . �` ., � r' / f�� - =��,�r ..I , ��.� �� ..�' : ,`.1�;�� af �` �` ,� ��`;y *k;',� ->4 �r, �, � :r �.�� , o �� ' , .�� s �a� �'� � r ..�' .: � .t da j ��;G {. (. �; '�' ��\ : �_ t" � o�'�� ;,s ��"', .'e �. "�.. � m CNi � y '.� " . ,` � � �� ;i � �_ l'?s,, � .•��1, � v� '� . � L� ie � O \ , a+ . � V r r \` � ��rt�. � (G r J n � '.: . ,. � , p' 'y, M � �.�. ' �",y ` `'., �� f d t � , ?y: � .:d t� y//r� . �� y �N \'�`.: ^ t�`�, �...�a �,,[�, f r �� ; '�" \�� r ..`? (t S ,,d SS .. .. . . �.�' ` Y s . . . �-� •��r �a \ \ �� ,�;� r � �y, °';�.� � ai � . . ♦ � � � � � `��'� • ; i �'< \<�� iy�� . �' � T�:�.' � � - . �,r �, �i �fi y : ` � `i �,.` . � �� y �` `<< � * \�� tUy r 7 � l� � � �T -.,,1 '�\\� � � .� . -.4 ��''Y �. t �. � �T � � �� (6. .ro' ,l�� \ \� y, 2tx v �-.�� .J�R ` . �� yy�� .i ` �J�. � �1�\� ,LR�i`� �- _,�b S i t r,. Sx .� , �-, ,�,`�� o-, i �r�� iy � � .�'Y;� \,� _,��1 �� `i4 !";, * Y:� t .;� ��' ,7 r '"� , �.a�w i z� X '-s i .t� 1 �i � �[ �t�rE � � ` K"� ; � o-� �\1�r y�\C� .'v $�, } F � � at 1� � p {<�t ' �y ,g� � A a r �, 111, i r J r r�.,ef ,`� � ?�} %�� , � J�� tj. ,!'� M 1� � tiY. $ � F ro C. 5 �'i�o +'+! �� / ��,5 � ,* \\�� LS,`��.A�; ��\l :��i S �ti1 i t�' ��..�.R ��~` ��t � �J �� r a � � �+ .� < < :f � Y P� � a*,k�� .,F� S t,� ��9 � ,,;�' '� i # �„�:'L3_� —.,.-_,.. . %� �J �.i � 4 ,�.. � :\G� �`� , +� „�� 17 r � �.,� + �4 a�_,' �" x3:� At,� \c S � + N � /Y j,, ��a.r \ `5 �1 �' �� 1 �`� �`Q`\�` � �``, M1'1. �u � � } F9 A•�'�l:_s .ty`v� _. a-�-f{"� .. T,f� �:�-r,s. 't � Y \i �`:\�� tR�1,1 \ tf�. i' </�' ftj C ' �.. . y ; ..�� t '';,.. � �- c'7 t41.. .\• �+��» '�'� � ' ',��a o � � ] '.s� .e. �` .�.,! . ��`r� ` �;�;� ..\��% �C��°7,i `\�\, '3✓Gd�,�\ �'��'��'a`a��: z� �.t ,`„lC�,�j ;� ;"� � l7 ` �� ; ai� � � ��.. �. � �`c�.� � �J.� . V, � A 7/, �� _��C!,t R . Y 1 ' ('7 �� .T �� >> �N c R�;�� . .Yv,.'"t s.,,�.l \. ��el�.. . ` . ' f �c ` .t �;. 1 � ''��l,y�� . 70 } �'• �-i .G "�{9 .��yy�'� t,. \4 � `�' �>.� . ; '�\ �"�.�, � '� ,j�i.y " �,,�_i�''q •�` ,�,+t . `•i � 4 ,; �d `:.._ � p ��O' t ��..,� y_ ti•x1 S� � t , s � . � 4 6�+ �� '�r ��.. • �o �, � �,�� /� ��'��,`�co�� '„ `` r` � ,�"a a,. � r' ��z , ' '`� � .�,�,� � � � ln �,'.."� � .rt / � . . � ! y � �� sr � �;.� ',, ..�,� ,��.�� %,` � �.� � � � °° �� y'�Y� .� \ \i f �„ (',� f � �i \]7it� ` ,..SSA 'S. . . � �l�' .' ' (�. . •� : s� : � . . �.. . ,v�� 1 'k: �je ,, � �'�fi` �1.� � \\ M l�C-s. � 1�ti ��i' � � `� O> �C .� � � 6�i tl� +,�', ,�� t ��A m ui ` ' - c'O ,l� % '``�a ' �' •� `d' il. r � F- v � ,\'`�. ��4 �<� } e7'��•.. , ,��a3 3� � d? y ' ��°��;��, y�P �`,' ` �` ,� �r � `'�t ��t�� `�`��\ � ` a i��' ,�t ,�� * ` �. . � , ° ,� ��'j Q � �� `� i �, � ,� t} ,� � `�Wk y�� o � ,� _ Q �� `�.. c7 ,� �',��"�r�i H�. p o `.� �� . ',� ,`tj Y �� :��ir �,�/" `r j , \ � � , ♦, � .t � S;�X� i��J�Z�� , \� � �G �. ��" �F � , '�� ,f�� . o '�, • �� ,; �� ' i - ' � �11!' 1t`�1:�.�k4��w��—�—_-1j� ��" � ., ° � ----- -------- ---:-._r...._�,___ »+ � � � , �+�� ' � � a � ��:��,i�L �-r C $ - a �'r � ` . ' r' - Rt ca c,:�w�._ � t ' � �� aac:•c e +�+ tn � �� > � � ,�� , - �sa . . . �:'�`'�� ' V� d � � �� , . � � . � .i.+ � � � � � �� ,� �� O 0 - . � : . �. � . � �� `� fi , �� r � C � � '_ �� ' '� � O � � , .� � � `�' �4_ � `� � � � � L � ° �` � � + � � � � ' ° � � �� "a s. . r ; ,, ` �� G� � � � � � � � � �� '� � � Ua ,� Dale Schoeppner April 30, 2013 Chief Building Official City of Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55122-1810 Dear Mr. Schoeppner: The Metropolitan Council Environmental Services (MCES) Division has determined the SAC to be charged for the wastewater capacity demand for Paragon Outlets buildin�300 to be located at 3965 Eagan Outlets Pkwy. within the City of Eagan. The City will be charged 5 SAC Units for this project, as determined below. The Council understands this building is speculative retail. SAC U n its Charges: Office 588 sq. ft. @ 2400 sq. ft. /SAC Unit 0.25 Meeting 214 sq. ft. @ 1650 sq. ft. /SAC Unit 0.13 Retail (speculative) 67514 sq. ft. @ 3000 sq. ft. /SAC Unit 22.50 Counter seating 42 ft. /1.5 ft. /seat @ 10 seats/SAC Unit 2.80 Indoor seating (non-fixed) 5689 sq. ft. / 15 sq. ft. /seat @ 10 seats/SAC Unit 37.93 Total Charge: 63.61 .^�. L� Credits: Cedar Grove Phased Development 59.00 Net Charge: 4.61 or 5 At the time the finishing permits are issued, if the use changes from its speculative use to a different use, then the SAC assignment needs to be reviewed based on that change. The business information was provided to MCES by the applicant at this time. It is also the •� -•.- -- . �. � :� • . - . .� �� . . .� � . • �•�- - . . . . .�1.�`��.�P+�LI�"� • . .... .. - � � � a� � � � City's responsibility to substantiate the business use and size at the time of the final inspection. If there is a change in use or size, a redetermination will need to be made. If you have any questions, call me at 651-602-1118 or email karon.cappaert@metc.state.mn.us. Sincerely, t�, Karon Cappaert SAC Program Technical Specialist Environmental Services Division KC:kg: 130430A4 Determination expiration: 04/30/2015 cc: J. Nye, MCES Amy Griffin, Eagan (email) Salem LaHood, Paragon (email) Page-2 � April 3Q 2013 � METROPOLITAN COUNCIL A Structural Steei Special inspection Final Report Cedar Grove Outlet Mall—Building 300 3905 Eagan Outlets Parkway Eagan, Minnesota Prepared for Paragon Outlets Eagan LLC Project BL-12-04579A July 31, 2014 Braun Intertec Corporation � ' Braun Intertec Corporation Phone:952•995•2000 . uooi Hampshire Ave S Fax: 952•995•2ozo Minneapolis,MN 5543g Web: braunintertec.com July 31, 2014 Project BL-12-04579A Mr. Steven Trainer Paragon Outlets Eagan LLC 217 E Redwaod Street, 21st Fioor Baltimore, MD 21202 Re: Structural Steel Special Inspection Procedural and Final Report Cedar Grove Outlet Mall—Building 300 3905 Eagan Outlets Parkway Eagan, Minnesota Dear Mr.Trainer: Please find attached to this procedural report the Structural Steel Special Inspection Final Report for the Cedar Grove Outlet Mall Building 300 Project and the supporting Special Inspection Daily Reports. Special Inspection and Testing Procedures The special inspection services were periodically provided by International Code Council (ICC) certified special inspectors in accordance with the requirements of the Minnesota State Building Code, Chapter 17 of the International Building Code (IBC) and the project plans and specifications. The purpose of special inspections is to provide a review of the contractor's work designated by the project structural engineer as needing special inspection under the guidelines of the IBC to determine compliance with the approved construction documents. The special inspector does not have the responsibility or authority to, nor is it the intent of special inspections to have them,judge or modify the construction documents. Only the structural engineer of record can do this. As the speclal inspections were completed, a Special Inspection Daily Report was prepared to summarize the results of our inspections and testing. A copy of this report was provided to the contractor's site representative for their review and records. As part of this report, items needing correction or discrepancies observed from the approved construction documents were noted. We also summarized the discrepancies documented in a Discrepancy Log. As needed, we also contacted the project structural engineer for additional clarification on specific issues related to the drawings or discrepancies observed. i�ians and Specificatians The plans and project documents available at the site were used for our inspections. From time to time, we received plan modifications from the structural engineer. When received,these were used to evaluate the work completed in the field. Visual Examination of the Field-Made Welds Visual examination of the field welds was conducted in accordance with American Welding Society (AWS) D1.1-2010, Figure 5.4 and Table 6.1 requirements and the requirements of the project plans and specifications. AA/EOE Providing engineering and enuironmental solutions since 1957 • Paragon Outsets Eagan LLC Project BL-T2-04579A July 31, 2014 Page 2 Tension-Controi Bolted Connection Observations Tension-control bolted connection observations were conducted to determine if the bolt holes were filled, if the correct bolts were used, if the nuts were fully engaged and if the splined end of the tension- control bolts had separated from the body of the bolt. Removal of th� splined end is a direct indicator the bolt has been torqued to the minimum snap-off load. At connections where the splined ends were not, or could not be removed,the torque applied to the bolt by the contractor was determined using a hand-held torque wrench. In addition, each connection was observed for fit-up and to determine if the various plies were in contact with one another. Hex-Head Bolted Connection Observations Hex-head bolting observations were performed to determine if the bolt holes were filled, if the correct bolts were used, if the nuts were fully engaged and if they appeared to be snug tight. Each hex-head bolted connection was observed for fit-up and to determine if the various plies were in contact with one another. Random bolts were also selected at various connections to determine if the nuts were snug tight. This was done using a wrench and cheater bar. Metal Deck Weld and Fastener Observations Metaf deck weld observations were conducted in general accordance with AWS D1.3-2008,Section 6.0 requirements and the requirements of the project plans and specifications. Items reviewed included the quality, size and spacing of the welds. In addition,the location and the completeness of the side-lap fastener installation were observed and evaluated. Metal Deck Mechanical Fasteners Observations of the metal deck mechanical fasteners were completed to document the screw fasteners were installed as required in the construction documents and in accordance with the requirements of the manufacturer, Items noted were the placement. Column Anchor Bolt Observations The column anchor bolts were observed to determine if they were in place, and if the nuts were installed, fully engaged and snug tight. The base plates were observed to determine if they were in full contact with the adjoining surface. If required by the construction documents,we also observed if the plate washers were installed. Cold Form Metal-Framing Mechanical Fasteners Visual observations were conducted to determine if the mechanical fasteners used in the cold form metal-framing construction were placed in conformance with the requirements of the structural details, plans and specifications. � �� - Raragon Outlets Eagan LLC Project BL-12-04579A July 31, 2014 Page 3 General In performing its services, Braun Intertec used that level of care and skill ordinarily exercised by reputable members of its profession currently practicing in the same locality. No warranty, express or implied, is made. Thank you for the opportunity to provide the special inspection and testing services for this project. After review of the attached Special Inspection Final Report, if you have any questions or require additional information, please cal) Dan Graham at 952.995.2524 or Marv Denne at 952.995.2510. Sincerely, BRAUN INTERTEC CORPORATION � ��'��`"C"-�.�''��e'�'�-� ��---� Daniel P. Graha� ICC Ce ified Special Inspector-Structural Steel and Welding Christopher R. Kehl, PE Principal-Senior Engineer Attachment: Structural Steel Special Inspection Final Report c: Jeff Graham, PE;Thorson Baker&Associates, Inc. Mark Kronbeck; Alliant Engineering, Inc. James Miller; Dalpos Architects& Integrators Craig Novaczyk; City of Eagan Michael Thorson, PE;Thorson Baker&Associates, Inc. Brad McCarter, PE; Braun Intertec �� ' Braun intertec Corporation Phone:952•995•2000 . uooi Hampshire Ave S Fax: 952•995•2020 Minneapolis,MN 55438 Web: braunintertec.com Structural Steel Special Inspection Final Report City of: Eagan Date: July 31, 2014 Attention: Mr. Steven Trainer Project: Cedar Grove Outlet Mall—Building 300 3905 Eagan Outlets Parkway Eagan, Minnesota Braun Intertec Project: BL-12-04579A In accordance with the Minnesota State Building Code, Section 1704 of the lnternational Building Code and the agreed-upon scope of services,the required special inspections and testing have been provided for the following items: Bolting. The bolted connections detailed in the attached Special Inspection Daily Reports were observed in general accordance with the requirements of the plans and specifications.There are currently no outstanding or unresolved bolted connection-related issues. Structural Field Welding. The welded connections detailed in the attached Special Inspection Daily Reports were observed in general accordance with the requirements of the project plans and specifications. Discrepancies were noted and documented. These connections were found to be acceptable following the required corrections provided from the engineer. There are currently no outstanding or unresolved structural welding-related issues. Metal Deck Welding and Fasteners. The metal deck welding, deck fasteners and side-lap fasteners detailed in the attached Special Inspection Daily Reports were observed in general accordance with the requirements of the project plans and specifications. There are currently no outstanding or unresolved decking-related issues. Mechanical Fasteners. The mechanical fasteners detailed in the attached Special Inspection Daily Reports were observed in general accordance with the requirements of the plans and specifications. There are currently no outstanding or unresolved mechanical fastener-related issues. AA/EOE Providing engineering and enuironmental solutions since i957 I . � ; • Paragon Outlets Eagan LLC Project BL-12-04579A !� July 31, 2014 !� Page 2 '� I Conclusion I Based upon the inspections conducted, the testing performed and the attached reports, it is our �� professional judgment that,to the best of our knowledge, the inspected work was performed and completed in accordance with the approved plans, specifications, engin�er-provided modifications and applicable workmanship provisions of the Minnesota State Building Code and the International Building Code. Inspecting Firm: Braun Intertec Corporation I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer��,e{5�3;;: °,�; < under th aws of the State of Minnesota. :''�`h�`� `�"°� '� e��, ,,�(- d a» .� �,.. " _ �1W m'y�Ai b4M �e4 N . . .I�/�`-- 4 ��e , i :�:`° °� fY;f"4 �fi'�t Ft 'Y .Y�°�e �a�.:f'�� " ��d .�'• a�p %� — Christopher R. Kehl, PE �� a �" �«t.,' s�.� �i p'_.Y e ,� ' . Principal-Senior Engineer J�,�_ �.�� '' ,. License fVumber: 43459 °f `f�f�s-� � °�°� "` July 31, 2014 � Attachments: Special Inspection Daily Reports 1 through 14 Summary of Discrepancy Log �� ry � :P a issue Date: 20131ti1/01 Rev No.: 0 �� - s �� 3 �. '��<• =a �� u � Special Inspection Daily Report City of Eagan, MN. Page 1 of 1 Report Na.: Structurai Steel#1 Date of this Report: 1�1-11-13 Project Name: Building 300 Project No.: BL-12-04579A Project Address: 3905 Eagan Outlets Parkway Client: Paragon Outiets Eagan Client Project No.: Weather: Sunny PM Brad McCarter Temperature: 70 ° F Type of Inspection: Inspection Coverage: ❑ Continuous ❑ Masonry ❑ Rebar Placement ❑ Foundations ❑ Special Cases: � Periodic �Welding 8�Boiting ❑ Concrete ❑ Fireproofing ❑ Piles 8�Piers ❑Tendon Placement ❑ Soils Did the architect or engineer authorize changes to City-approved plans? ❑Yes (Listed Below) ❑ No Description and location of work completed: _ _ __ _ _ __ ___ _ _. __ .__ _ Visual weld observations were performed in accordance with AWS D1.1 Section 6 2010 criteria on the following: 1) Bar joist fillet welds Roof Level Grid G.8-H.8 12-18 per Nucor Vulcraft details. No discrepancy noted 2) Anchor bolts at Foundation Level Grid G.8-H.8 12-18 piies in direct contact with full nut engagement present. 3) Truss girder fillet welds at Roof Level Grid G.8-H.8 12-18 per Nucor Vulcraft details. No discrepancy noted List tests performed: _ _ _ _ __ __ _ __ __ _ _ . _ _ __ __ __ _ _ _ __ Visual _ _ _ _ __ __ ■ Are there any discrepancies noted from this day's observations? Yes ❑ No � ■ Are there any outstanding discrepancies on this project? Yes ❑ No � o If yes, see attached Summary Sheet. • Report given to Contractor: Yes � No ❑ To the best of our knowledge,work inspected was done in accordance with the approved plans, specifications, and applicable workmanship pravisions of the current IBG, except as noted above. 3igned: � �� '�'°o� Date: 10-11-13 Print Full Name: Daniel P. Graham I.D. No.: 1054095 S1&S2 �; � ".�� - ,� ' ` ' • � Issue Date: 2013/07/01 Rev No.: 0 , , ,�, � �, '',kS . . .�'�. 4� � I Special Inspection Daily Report '',, � - , City of Eagan, MN. Page 1 of 1 ' Repcsr:N�.: Structural Steel#2 Date of this Report: 10-15-13 III Project Name: Building 300 Project No.: BL-12-04579A ' Project Address 3905 Eagan Outlets Parkway ��I Client: Paragon Outlets Eagan Client Project No.: ��, Weather: Sunny PM Brad McCarter Temperature: 50 ° F I' Type of Inspection: Inspection Coverage: ❑ Continuous ❑ Masonry ❑ Rebar Placement ❑ Foundations ❑ Special Cases: � Periodic �Welding 8� Bolfing ❑ Concrete ❑ Fireproofing ❑ Piles 8�Piers ❑Tendon Placement ❑ Soils Did the architect or engineer authorize changes to City-approved plans? ❑ Yes (Listed Befow) ❑ No Description and location of work completed: _ _ _ _ _ __. _ _ _ _. __ _ _ _ _ _ Visual weld observations were performed in accordance with AWS D1.1 Section 6 2010 criteria on the following: 1) Bar joist fillet welds Roof Level Grid D-G.8 12-18 per Nucor Vulcraft details. No discrepancy noted Z) Anchor bolts at Foundation Level Grid D-G.8 12-18 plies in direct contact with full nut engagement present. 3} Truss girder fiilet we(ds at Roof Level Grid D-G.8 12-18 per Nucor Vulcraft details. No discrepancy noted 4) Moment plate fillet/groove welds to top and bottom beam flange at Roof Level Grid E.8&G.95 18 detail FlE307 and 13/S5.2. No discrepancy noted List tests performed: _ _ _ _ _ _ Visual • Are there any discrepancies noted from this day's observations? Yes ❑ No � ■ Are there any outstanding discrepancies on this project? Yes ❑ No � o If yes, see attached Summary Sheet. • Report given to Contractor: Yes � No ❑ To the best of ou�knowledge, work inspected was done in accordance with the approved plans, specifications, and applicabfe workmanship provisions of the current IBC, except as nated above. Signed: Date: 10-18-13 Print Full Name: Daniel P. Graham I.D. No.: 1054095 S18�S2 '�� issue Date: 2013/01/01 Rev No.: 0 � - � �}� ��'� - � : � `§��, ' ..f, :� � Special Inspection Daily Report City of Eagan, MN. Page 1 of 1 Repost Ido.: Structaral Stee!#3 Qate o#this Report: 10-23-13 Project Name: Building 300 Project No.: BL-12-04579A Project Address: 3905 Eagan Out{ets Parkway Client: Paragon Outlets Eagan Client Project No.: Weather: Partly Cloudy PM Brad McCarter Temperature: 40 ° F Type of Inspection: Inspection Coverage: ❑ Continuous ❑ Masonry ❑ Rebar Placement ❑ Foundations ❑ Special Cases: � Periodic � Welding 8�Bolting ❑ Concrete ❑ Fireproofing ❑ Piles & Piers ❑ Tendon Placement ❑ Soils Did the architect or engineer authorize changes to City-approved plans? ❑ Yes (Listed Below) ❑ No Description and location of work completed: _ _. _. _ _ _ __ _ _ _ . __ __ _ _ Visual weld observations were perFormed in accordance with AWS D1.1 Section 6 2010 criteria on the foflowing: 1) Bar joist fillet welds Roof Level Grid F-H 5.1-12 per Nucor Vulcraft detaEls. No discrepancy noted 2) Anchor bolts at Foundation Level Grid F-H 5.1-12 plies in direct contact with full nut engagement present. 3) Truss girder fillet welds at Roaf Levei Grid F-H 5.1-12 per Nucor Vulcraft details. No discrepancy noted List tests performed: _ _ _ __ ___ _ _ _ _ _ _ _._ __ _ . _ _ Visual . _ _ _ _ _ - _ • Are there any discrepancies noted from this day's observations? Yes ❑ No � • Are there any outstanding discrepancies on this project? Yes ❑ No � o If yes, see attached Surnmary Sheet. ■ Report given to Contractor: Yes � No ❑ To the best of our knowledge,work inspected was done in accordance with the approved plans, specifications, and applicable workmanship provisions of the current fBC, except as noted above. Signed: Date: 10-23-13 Print Full Name: Daniel P. Graham I.D. No.: 1054095 S1&S2 ��"� �;=��,;� Issue Date: 2013/01i01 �Rev No.; 0 � , '^u��'�� ; . �. ��•y �� : � . � � Special Inspection Daily Report City of Eagan, MN. Page 1 of 1 Report Na.: Structura� Stee6#4 Date of this Repo�t: 1�-29-13 Project Name: Building 300 Project No.: BL-12-04579A Project Address: 3905 Eagan Outlets Parkway Client: Paragon Outlets Eagan Client Project No.: Weather: Partly Cloudy PM Brad McCarter Temperature: 40 ° F Type of Inspection: Inspection Coverage: ❑ Continuous ❑ Masonry ❑ Rebar Placement ❑ Foundations ❑ Special Cases: � Periodic � Welding 8� Bolting ❑ Concrete ❑ Fireproofing ❑ Piles& Piers ❑Tendon Ptacement ❑ Soi{s � Did the architect or engineer authorize changes to City-approved plans? ❑Yes (Listed Below) ❑ No Description and location of work completed: _ - _.. _ __ __ _ _ _ _ Visual weld observations were performed in accordance with AWS D1.1 and D1.3 criteria on the following: 1) Bar joist filfet welds Upper Roof Level Grid E.8-H 18-20 per Nucor Vulcraft details. No discrepancy nated 2) Truss girder fillet welds at Upper Roof Level Grid E.8-N 18-20 per Nucor Vulcraft details. No discrepancy noted 3) Puddle welds and side lap fasteners at Roof Level Grid E-H.8 12-18. No discrepancy noted 4) Deck support angle/splice plate fillet welds at Roof Level Grid E-H.8 12-18. No discrepancy noted 5) Llight gauge framing slide clip to deck support angle/light gauge stud Grid Fi.8 8-18 per Excel drawings. No discrepancy noted List tests performed: _ _._ Visual _ __ __ ■ Are there any discrepancies noted from this day's observations? Yes ❑ No � • Are there any outstanding discrepancies on this project? Yes ❑ No � � If yes, see attached Summary Sheet. ■ Report given to Contractor: Yes � No ❑ To the best of aur knowledge, work inspected was done in accordance with the approved plans, specifications, and applicable workmanship provisions of the current IBC, except as noted above. Signed: � Date: 10-29-13 Print Full Name: Daniel P. Graham f.D. No.: 1054095 S18�S2 � �� ; �, � Issue Date: 2013/4A101 Rev No.: 0 s�. - � � F s �: ' '� '��' � ' �.� ��.� —� ,.a � � Special Inspection Daify Repart City of Eagan, MN. Page 1 of 1 Report�lc.: Structural Steel#5 Date of this Report: 10-31-13 Project Name: Buiiding 300 Project No.: BL-12-04579A Project Address: 3905 Eagan Outlets Parkway I Client: Paragon Outlets Eagan Client Project No.: �', Weather: Partly Cloudy PM Brad McCarter Temperature: 40 ° F �'�I Type of Inspection: Inspection Coverage: ❑ Continuous ❑ Masonry ❑ Rebar Placement ❑ Foundations ❑ Special Cases: � Periodic �Welding 8�Bolting ❑ Concrete ❑ Fireproofing ❑ Piles 8�Piers ❑ Tendon Placement ❑ Soils Did the architect or engineer authorize changes to City-approved plans? ❑ Yes (Listed Below) ❑ No Description and location of work completed: __ _ __ __ . _ _ _ _ . __ Visual weld observations were perFormed in accordance with AWS D1.1 and D1.3 criteria on the folfowing: 1) Bar joist fillet welds Roof Leve! Grid E-F and H.8-J 5.1-18 per Nucor Vulcraft details. Na discrepancy noted 2} Truss girder fillet welds at Roof Level Grid E-F and H.8-J 5.1-18 per Nucar Vulcraft details. No discrepancy noted 3) Llight gauge framing slide clip to deck support angleilight gauge stud Grid E 8-18 per Excel drawings. No discrepancy noted List tests perFormed: Visual _. _ __.. __ _ ■ Are there any discrepancies noted from this day's observations? Yes ❑ No � ■ Are there any outstanding discrepancies on this project? Yes ❑ No � � If yes, see attached Summary Sheet. ■ Report given to Contractor. Yes � No ❑ To the best of our knowledge, work inspected was done in accordance with the approved plans, specifications, and applicable workmanship provisians of the current IBC, except as noted abave. Signed: Date: 10-31-13 Print Full Name: Daniel P. Graham I.D. Mo.: 1054095 S1&S2 ' i � -��Y""��`�"��x` tssue Date: 2013I01/41 Rev No.: 0 `��".� � �c '.��`� � 3 -� � �� •� �� —� � : Special Inspection Daily Report ' City of Eagan, MN. Page 1 of 1 ', Report Pia.: 8tructural Steel#6 Date of this Report: 11-11-13 !, Project Name: Building 300 Project No.: BL-12-04579A , Project Address: 3905 Eagan Outlets Parkway ', Clienfi Paragon Outlets Eagan _ __ Client Project No.: _ _ __ ,, Weather: Sunny PM Brad McCarter Temperature: 30 ° F �i Type of Inspection: Inspection Coverage: ❑ Continuous ❑ Masonry ❑ Rebar Placement ❑ Foundations ❑ Special Cases: � Periadic �Welding 8� Bolting ❑ Concrete ❑ Fireproofing ❑ Piles &Piers ❑Tendon Placement ❑ Soils Did the architect or engineer authorize changes to City-approved plans? ❑Yes (Listed Below) ❑ No Description and lacation of work completed: . ___ ____ __ _ __ __ __ _ _ _ Visual weld observations were performed in accordance with AWS D1.1 and D1.3 criteria on the following: 1) Puddle welds and side lap fasteners at Roof Levef Grid E-J 5.1-12. No discrepancy noted 2) Deck support angle and splice bar fiAet welds Roof Level Grid E-J 5.1-92. No discrepancy noted 3} Bar joist fillet welds at High Rotunda Roof Grid F.3-G.819-21. No discrepancy noted 4}Truss girder fillet welds at High Rotunda Roof Grid F.3-G_8 19-21. No discrepancy noted 5) Moment plate fillet welds an bar joist/truss girder at Roof Level, Mid Roof and High Rotunda Roof Grid E-J 5-12. No discrepancy noted 6) Tube steel/x-brace angle fillet welds at Towers Grid E-J 5-12. No discrepancy noted List tests performed: _ ___ __ __ __ _ _ _ _ Visual _ _. • Are there any discrepancies noted from this day's observations? Yes ❑ No � ■ Are there any outstanding discrepancies on this project? Yes ❑ No � o If yes, see attached Summary Sheet. ■ Report given to Contractor: Yes � No ❑ To the best of our knowtedge, work inspected was done in accordance with the appraved plans, specifications, and applicable workmanship provisians of the current IBC, except as noted above. >igned: Date: 11-11-13 Print Full Name: Daniel P. Graham I.D. No.: 1054095 S1&S2 - � _. 3. � Issue Date: 201310'il01 Rev No.: 0 �?�� aF e �� ' .� � ` ��.�;: � • � = ;� ,..�� _:�� ,.�� _ � Speciaf Inspection Daily Report City of Eagan, MN. Page 1 of 1 Repor#l��.: Structural Steel#7 Da±s of this Repert: 11-�3-�!3 Project Name: Building 300 Project No.: BL-12-04579A Project Address: 3905 Eagan Outlets Parkway Client: Paragon Outlets Eagan Client Project No.: Weather: Sunny PM Brad McCarter Temperature: 40 ° F Type of Inspection: Inspection Coverage: ❑ Continuous ❑ Masonry ❑ Rebar Placement ❑ Foundations ❑ Special Cases: � Periodic � Welding & Bolting ❑ Concrete ❑ Fireproofing ❑ Piles&Piers ❑ Tendon Placement ❑ Soils Did the architect or engineer authorize changes to City-approved plans? ❑Yes (Listed Below} ❑ No Description and location of work completed: _ _ -__ . -__ . _ _ _ _ _ _ Visual weld observations were performed in accordance with AWS D1.1 criteria on the following: 1) A325 3/4"and 1"tension control boltsat Radius Grid R.1-R.7 and Roof Level (low, mid and high)Grid E-J 5-18 ( misaligned bolt holes at knife plates fillet welded with full vertical and returns at Grid G.95 20 mid level, H 5.2 (north side �f co{umn), F 5.2(south side of column)weld quality found acceptable. Misaligned bolt holes at clip angles fillet welded � with full vertical and retums at Grid H.5 &E.5 5.2, E 5.3, 14' 19.4-20 weld quality found acceptable). No discrepancy noted 2) Knife pfate fillet welds at Radius Grid R.1-R.7. Weld quality found acceptable 3) Tube steel to column fillet welds at Radius Grid R.1-R.7 detail 17/S5.2. No discrepancy noted 4) Tube to beam fillet welds at Radius Grid R.1-R.7 detail 17/S5.2. No discrepancy noted List tests perFormed: _- _ __ __ . _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ Visua! ■ Are there any discrepancies noted from this day's observations? Yes ❑ No � • Are there any outstanding discrepancies on this project? Yes ❑ No � o If yes, see attached Summary Sheet. ■ Report given to Contractor. Yes � No ❑ To the best of aur knowledge, wark inspected was done in accardance with the approved plans, specifications, and applicable workmanship provisions of the current iBC, except as noted above. ii ned: � 9 '� Date: 11-13-13 Print Full Name: Daniel P. Graham I.D. Na.: 1054095 S18�S2 . �; � ,� �� a�. �� REQUEST FOR INFO TION �Y� � � w�m+nc u.sruw uunoHSwn . Project: Paragon Outlet Mall RFI#: 0256 Project No: 003334000-LIVE Date: 13-Nov-2013 To: Thorson Baker &Associates Attn: Jeff Graham Subject: Structural detail E/S6.1 Please review the following matter and advise us how to proceed: Would it be ok if the bottom weld is not done at the connection shown in detail E/56.1,where the horizontal HSS8x8x5/16 meets the vetical tube? Due to the parapet walls being built and wrapped in EIFS or roofing, there is not enough room to get the bottom weld. Suggested Response YeS Cost Impact: Unlrnown Estimated Cost Amount: 0.00 Schedule Impact: Unknown Impact Day Type: Calendar Day Estimated Impact Days: 0.00 Further information regarding the above question (question clarification): Please respond no later than 20-Nov-2013 to minimize delay or interference with our abil ity to proceed with the work. Reply To: Nolan P Beron Company: Rvan Companies US,Inc. Please respond via Proliance if you have a Proliance User Account, ctherwise please res�,ond via email. Reply: yes it is acceptable to not weid the tube across the bottom. provided sealant at the joint to prevent moisture from entering inside fhe tube. Further information regarding the above reply (answer clarification): �ep�y provit�ed�iy: Jeff vraham Ccm�a►�y: T1-iorsori Ba�cer&Associates TeL- Fax: Emai!: �F1 Top stee! radius at ficsod court Number 003334000-LIVE ProJect N�me Paragon Outlet Mall Address Information � Notes Tel: Fax: ► GENERAL Current State Answer Submitted Subject Top steel radius af foad court Number 0241 Priority HtGH ► QUESTICJN Questfon The top steel radius(cniumn�oistsJbeams}at the food court daes not appear to connect with the meta! stud wall. Detaii 7AlS5.2 shows the angie,for the steel stud wall,attaching directiy to the bearn. The angie is curved,and the beams are not. This leaves a space approximatly 12"fram the joist taii ar beam to the cur+red ang(e, The centerline radius of ths crolumns is 28'-9 9/2",and the outsitte of stud wa8 is 30'-3 5/8". °.:t��h�'is�pi�iure af the pro�se��x f�r this. Can a piec�o#2-1!2"x 2-1!2"tube k�Gse�te�xtend the joist tai)or beam out to the curoed angle? The tube overlaps#he jaist by about 12 inches,and has$ inches of we(d to the joist. Suggested Respanse Reason tor fluestion C}ariflcation � QuesfJon Sent Date 31-Oct-2013 Questfon 8ource Company Ryan Companies US,Inc. Question Source Contact tdalan P Beron Question Source Cantract R ANSWER Answer see attached Fieasan for Answer Clarifica�ion Due DaEe Q1-Nov-20't3 Ptr�/lance Prirtted On: 13-Nov-2813 3:38 PM �� A� Fage t of 5 �umb�r 003s344t3�-Lill� Project Nam� Faragmn f3utlet[�iaf! Top steet radius at food court Rnswer Sent Date 11-Nov-2013 Answer Sourc�Company Thorson 8aker&Associates Answer Source Contact Jeff Graham Answea Source Contract w COST/MPACT Coat Impact Unknov�rn Estimated Cost Amount $0.00 Cast Impact Nate i SCNEDULE IMPACT Schedule impact Unknown Impact Day Type Calendar Day Estimated impact�ay$ OAO Schedule Imaact Note r a�Eas l�rea Cod� Rre�De�cription i CATEQORlES Category Cods Catagory Description Prollance PHrrtgd On: 13-Now2U13 3:38 PM Page 2 of b r�� ooy��oa��v� Proj�c�Atamd Paragoc�t3utlet P�lail Top steel radius at#o�d��ur� M l�ISClPLINES Discipline Code DlsCipllns Description ► �RAWINGS �'kfe Detall Section Post Date Impact Indicat�r Note TYPg R RPVfEW PROGESS Step Number Reviewing Reviewing Actua!Start Actual Fln�sh Reeommendatiutt Review Sent For Contact Company Dafs Date Corrtmenta� Reason DescrEption ► G�A{ERAL Greated By Nolan P Beran Creation Date 31-Oct-2013 2:05 PM �O�jf��C��Y �O�iS�t'�G�liit� Modifled Date 11-Nov-2013 11:57 AM Uoc Sub Tyoe Fiame RFI Tempiate Imported Dacument No Languag� er�-US AuEhar Project Logo URE. Authar Gom�sany Lago URL Fi'otldtlCe Prirrted Orr: 13-Flosr-2013 3:38 PM _.____. � �.p��v�_�,.. RI u�cer Cc�3334�i�G-Li�fE �r��e��h�am� �arag�n�u�Set E4�ai9 Ta{a st�e9 raSicas at faod cou�t ► ,4UTHOR lWFORMIATtOM Souroe Contact Nolan P Beron Source Corrapany Ryan Companies US, lnc. ► c�ocu�rEnrr s�rrrn+Gs p DOCUA9ENT REFEREIVCES 6ocument Type Trtie iD ► FILES AND L/NKS Descriptfon Doe Attachment Typ� Upload Date Flle Name Fi4e size Fii� 31-Oct-2093 food court radius.pdf 1253070 — __�...._.,_. _ _____ -- �id� 05-Nov-2013 RFi 241.pdf 1802788 igPCti08i3Cv f?��tst!�3Z: ?3=!'#O�a2Ql33:38?!N . ' Page 4 oi 5 Nus;ib�s Ov33��t3CY-�E�OL Project Narrse Paragan 63u#!e#Ma9i Top steei ratfius at food court � LllVKED SMALL PRt}.1�CTS Sma Nurn Note UDF UDF UDF UDF UDF UDF UDF UDF UDP UDF UDF UDF UDF UDF UOF UDF UDF UDF UDF i! ber s Loo Look Lov Look Laok Laok Text Text Num Num Curre Curre Date�ate Date Date Booi Boal Memo Pro] kup up1 kup up2 up2 up 2 1 2 e�ic e�ic ncy 1 ncy 2 1 2 / / ean ean 1 ect 1 peser 1 Code Descr 4 2 Tim Tim 1 2 Tit1e Cod iptlon Iption e 1 e 2 e ► L/MK S�TTlIVGS Prctllance Printed On: 13-Nnw2093 3:38 PM -�A�-T v�T Paga S of 5 - �� issue Date: 2013l01f01 Rev No.: 0 - ,s: . � "��' � �� s- .� - -�: Special inspection Daily Report City of Eagan, MN. Page 1 of 1 Report Na.: Structurai Steel#8 Date af this Report: i 1-18-13 Project Name: Building 300 Project No.: BL-12-04579A Project Address: 3905 Eagan Outlets Parkway Ctient: Paragon Out{ets Eagan Ciient Project No.: Weather: Partly Cloudy PM Brad McCarter Temperature: 40 ° F Type of inspection: Inspection Coverage: ❑ Continuous ❑ Masonry ❑ Rebar Placement ❑ Foundations ❑ Special Cases: � Periodic � Welding & Bolting ❑ Concrete ❑ Fireproofing ❑ Piles&Piers ❑ Tendon Placement ❑ Soils � Did the architect or engineer authorize changes to City-approved plans? 0 Yes (Listed Below) ❑ No Description and locatian of work completed: _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ �sual weld observations were performed in accordance with AWS D1.1 criteria on the following: 1) Outrigger tube s#eel extension fillet welds per RF{#241 at High Roof Rotunda fi(let welds. No discrepancy noted List tests performed: _ . __ _ ___ _ _ _ . Visuai _ _ _ _ _ . _ _. ■ Are there any discrepancies noted from this day's observations? Yes ❑ No � ■ Are ther�any autstanding discrepancies on this project? Yes ❑ No � n If yes, see attached Summary Sheet. ■ Report given to Contractor: Yes � No ❑ ', To the best of our knawledge, work inspecteci was done in accordance with the approv�d plans, specificatinns,and '� applicable wtirkmanship provisions af the current IBC, except as noted abave. �, iigned: Date: 11-18-13 Print Ful! Name: Daniel P. Graham I.D. No.: 1054095 S1&S2 �" � �: � 6ssue Date: 2013/01t01 Rev No.: 0 ; �.,,� �; � p. �&�=��,�. _:�,� _� , � .n� ;� � f � Special Inspection Daiiy Report � City of Eagan, MN. Page 1 of 1 Report No.: Structurai Steel#9 Date of th9s Repor±: 11-21-13 Project Name: Building 300 Project No.: SL-12-04579A Project Address: 3905 Eagan Outlets Parkway Client: Paragan Outiets Eagan Client Project No.: Weather: Partly Cloudy PM Brad McCarter Temperature: 40 ° F Type of Inspection: Inspection Coverage: ❑ Continuous ❑ Masonry ❑ Rebar Placement ❑ Foundations ❑ Special Cases � Periodic �Welding 8� Bolting ❑ Concrete ❑ Fireproofing ❑ Piles &Piers ❑Tendon Placement ❑ Soils Did the architect or engineer authorize changes to City-approved plans? ❑Yes (Listed Beiow) ❑ No Description and location of work completed: _ _ . Visual weld observations were performed in accordance with AWS D1.1 and D1.3 criteria on the following: - 1) Puddle welds and side lap fasteners at Mid Roof level Grid E-J 18-20. No discrepancy noted 2) Deck support angle fillet welds (RFI #259) at Mid Roof Level Grid E-J 18-20. No discrepancy noted List tests performed: Visual _ _ ■ Are there any discrepancies noted from this day's observations? Yes ❑ No � ■ Are there any outstanding discrepancies on this project? Yes ❑ No � o ff yes, see attached Summary Sheet. • Report given to Contractor: Yes � No ❑ To the best of our knowledge, work inspected was done in accordance with the approved pfans, specifications, and applicable workmanship provisions of the current IBC, except as noted above. �igned: Date: 11-21-13 Print Full Name: Daniel P. Graham 1.D. No.: 1054095 S1&S2 �'�=-�i?�s,. �'�'��:�-�,''��az�,, - �� ; Issue Date: 2013/01/01 Rev No.: 0 � 4 � • �� . � �� i� � � �-s�'�� 3'�3�"- .s,yF�'�". . �'%�_�":Rfi�� rc�i � � :e�'3-s°� az8 .�k� . . �� a Special Inspect�on Daily Report City of Eagan, MN. Page 1 of 1 Report No.: Structural Steei#10 Date of this Report: 12-30-13 Project Name: Buiiding 300 Project No.: BL-12-04579A Project Address: 3905 Eagan Outlets Parkway , Client: Paragon Outiets Eagan Client Project No.: Weather: Indoors PM Brad McCarter Temperature: 60 ° F Type of Inspection: Inspection Coverage: � ❑ Continuous ❑ Masonry ❑ Rebar Placement ❑ Foundations ❑ Special Cases: � � Periodic �Welding 8�Botting ❑ Concrete ❑ Fireproofing ❑ Piles& Piers ❑Tendon Placement ❑ Soils Did the architect or engineer authorize changes ta City-approved plans? ❑Yes (Listed Belaw) ❑ Na Description and location of work completed: __ . _ _ _ _ The#oNowing visual observations were performed on bar joists from siab on grade (various areas with damaged chordsllacings). Results as follow to be reviewed by the joist supplier, Nucor: *A) Grid E.8-G 'l8-19, 1st jaist east of 18, 6th apex from E.8 towards G, north diagonal bent approx. 1!2" *B)Grid H-H.8 10, 6th apex fram H towards H.8,south diagonal bent apprx. 1/2" "C) Grid H-H.8 11-12, 1 st joist west of 12, 6th apex from H towards H.8, north diaganal bent approx. 1/2" *D} Grid H-H.8 12-13, 1 st joist east of 12, 5th apex from H towards H.8, south diagonal bent approx, 1/2" *E} Grid Grid E-F 12-13, 1 st joist east of 12-13, 1 st apex from E towards F diagonal to shoe bent approx. 1/2",vertical bentftw�ste� ap��ox 1" (see�icturej. Afso 6rh apex from E towards F, south diagonal t�ent approx. 112". List tests performed: _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . __ _ __ __ _ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ Visua[ ____ ._ _ _ __ _ _ _ • Are thsre any discrepancies noted from this day's observations? Yes � No ❑ • Are there any outstanding discrepancies on this project? Yes � No ❑ o !f yes, see attached Summary Sheet. ■ Report given to Contractor: Yes � No ❑ To the best of our knowledge, work inspected was done in accordance with the approved pfans, specifications, and applicable workmanship provisions of the current BC, except as noted above. Signed: Date: 12-3d-13 Print Full Name: Daniel P. Graham 8�Troy 8auman I.D. No.: 1Q54Q95 S1&S2 � 5'" _F� s' � v ' . . �+�,,�,�,3��.�� ; issue Date: 2013/01101 Rev No.: 0 � � � � , • .� �� a� �� t� � �� ` � '-. #' ��- ��-� Special inspec�ion Daify Report City of Eagan, MN. Page 1 of 1 �'� � Report No.: Structural Stee(#11 Date of this Report: ?-26-14 Project Name: Building 300 Projec# No.: BL-12-04579A Project Address: 3905 Eagan Outlets Parkway , Ctient: Paragon Outlets Eagan Client Project No.: Weather: Indoors PM Brad McCarter Temperature: 50 ° F Type of Inspection: Inspection Coverage: ❑ Continuous ❑ Masonry ❑ Rebar Placement ❑ Foundations ❑ Special Cases: � Periodic � Welding & Bolting ❑ Concrete ❑ Fireproofing ❑ Piles& Piers ❑ Tendon Placement ❑ Soils Did the architect or engineer authorize changes to City-approved plans? ❑ Yes (Listed Below) ❑ No Description and location of work completed: _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ . Visua{weld observations were performed in accordance with AWS D1.1 criteria on the following: 1} Bar joist/truss girder bottom chord to column stabilizer fillet wefds at Roof Level Grid E-H.8 5-18 per Nucor Vulcraft details and 55.1 notes. No discrepancy noted 2) Upfift angle from bar joist to truss girder/beam fillet welds at Roof Level Grid E-H.8 5-18 per Nucor Vulcraft details and S5.1 details. No discrepancy noted List tests performed: Visual _ ■ Are there any discrepancies noted from this day's observations? Yes ❑ No � • Are there any outstanding discrepancies on this project? Yes � No ❑ o If yes, see attached Summary Sheet. • Report given to Contractor: Yes � No ❑ To the best of our knowledge, work inspected was done in accordance with the approved plans, specifications, and applicable workmanship provisions of the current IBC, except as noted above. : Signed: � Date: 2-26-14 Print Fult Name: Daniel P. Graham I.D. Na.: 1054095 S1&S2 �� '� issue Date: 2013/01/01 Rev No.: 0 � ��.t � • � � ��, �' �� y.��, ,� �� . �� ° , � � ��`� �� Special inspection Daily Report Ciiy of Eagan, MN. Page 1 of 1 Report No.: Structural Steel#12 Date of±his Report: 4-14-14 Project Name: Buiiding 300 Project No.: BL-12-04579A Project Address: 3905 Eagan Outlets Parkway Client: Paragon Outlets Eagan Glient Project No.: Weather: Indoors PM Brad McCarter Temperature: 60 ° F Type of Inspection: Inspection Coverage: ❑ Continuous ❑ Masonry ❑ Rebar Placement ❑ Foundations ❑ Special Cases: � Periodic �Welding 8�Bolting ❑ Concrete ❑ Fireproofing ❑ Piles�Piers ❑ Tendon Placement ❑ Soils Did the architect or engineer authorize changes to Csty-approved plans? ❑Yes (Listed Below} ❑ No Description and location of work completed: I� __ _ _ Visual weld observations were performed in accordance with AWS D1.1 2010 criteria on outstanding discrepancies on �i Report#10 12-30-13 on Item A) Grid E.8-G 18-19, 1 st joist east of 18, 6th apex from E.8 towards G, north diagonal bent approx. 1/2", ltem B) Grid H-H.8 10, 6th apex from H towards H.8, south diagonal bent appnc. 1/2", Item C) Grid H-H.8 11-12, 1st joist west of 12, 6th apex from H towards H.8, north diagonal bent approx. 1/2"and Item D} Grid H-H.8 12- 13, 1st joist east of 12, 5th apsx from H towards H.8, south diagona! bent approx, 1/2"have now been repaired/reinforeed per Nucor fixes. No discrepancy noted Item '`E) Grid Grid E-F 12-13, 1st joist east of 12-13, 1st apex from E towards F diagonal to shoe bent approx. 1/2", vertica! bentltwisted aprrox 1"(see picture). Also 6th apex from E towards F,south diagona!bent apprax. 1/2"has not been repaired _ _ _ _ List tests performed: Visua! _ _ _ __ __ _ _ __ _ _ _ __ . _ __ _ ■ Are there any discrepancies noted from this day's observations? Yes ❑ No � ■ Are there any outstanding discrepancies on this project? Yes � No ❑ o If yes, see attached Summary Sheet. • Report given to Contractor: Yes � No ❑ To the best of our knowledge, work inspected was done in accordance with the approved plans, spec�cations, and applicable workmanship provisions of the current IBC, except as noted above. Signed: � Date: 4-14-14 Print Fuli Name: Daniel P. Graham I.D. No.: 1054095 S1&S2 � t?'� � ' ' �- ., �r� '"� �, �;. Issue Date: 2013/01l01 Rev No.: 0 . � � ,.:� �; $ � ��a +� '�^� t � a'� . r�, � ,�..��.. _ �;-` �� . .. � �;: ��_ �� . � �. _ � �LL�- R � Special Inspection Daily Report City of Eagan, MN. Page 1 of 1 Repost No.: Structural Steel#13 Date af this Report: 4-15-14 Project Name: Buiiding 300 Project No.: BL-12-04579A Project Address: 3905 Eagan Outlets Parkway Client: Paragon Outlets Eagan Client Project No.: Weather: Indoors PM Brad McCarter Temperature: 50 ° F Type of inspection: Inspection Coverage: ❑ Continuous ❑ Masonry ❑ Rebar Placement ❑ Foundations ❑ Special Cases: � Periodic �Welding 8�Bolting ❑ Concrete ❑ Fireproofing ❑ Piles 8�Piers ❑Tendon Placement ❑ Soils Did the architect or engineer authorize changes to City-approved plans? ❑ Yes (Listed Below) ❑ No Description and location of work completed: Visual weld observations were performed in accordance with AWS D1.1 criteria on the following: 1) Bar joist/truss girder bottom chord to coiurnn stabilizer fil{et welds at Roof Level Grid E-H.8 1&20.8 per Nucor Vulcraft details and S5.1 nQtes. No discrepancy noted 2) Uplift angle from bar joist to truss girder/beam fillet welds at Roof Level Grid E-H.8 18-20.8 per Nucor Vulcraft details and 55.4 details. No discrepancy noted i List tests performed; _ Visual _ _ _ _ _ _ • Are there any discrepancies noted from this day's observations? Yes ❑ No � • Are there any outstanding discrepancies on this project? Yes � No ❑ o If yes, see attached Summary Sheet. • Report given to Contractor: Yes � No ❑ To the best of our knowledge, work inspected was done in accordance with the approved plans, specifications, and applicable workmanship provisions of the current IBC, except as noted above. Signed: __��'�� Date: 4-15-14 G Print Full Name: Daniel P. Graham I.D. No.: 1054095 S1&S2 �'�'�� ''�s�.. , ��,�'��k ��y�� ,; Issue Dat�: 2013(Q1101 Rev No.: 4 � q�. ��r ��;. �° � �� . • <�:� , ,�`� �,.� � ° ��-� �''�,� ��,.�°�'��,`�'`�.��, � -�`�� ,"�i�`� '��^ �� x' � ��Y�' `� �X �� Speciat Inspection Daily Repart _��. �.�.�� City of Eagan, MN. Page 1 of 1 Report No.: Structurai Steel#14 Date af fhis Report: 5-13-14 Project Name: Buiiding 300 Project No.: BL-12-04579A Project Address 3905 Eagan Clutlets Parkway Client: Paragon Outlets Eagan Ciient Praject No.: Weather: indoors PM Brad McCarter Temperature: 50 ° F Type of Inspection: fnspection Coverage: ❑ Continuous ❑ Masonry ❑ Rebar Placement ❑ Foundations ❑ Special Cases � Periodic � Welding & Bolting ❑ Concrete ❑ Fireproofing ❑ Piles & Piers ❑ Tendon Placement ❑ Soils Did the architect or engineer authorize changes to City-approved plans? ❑ Yes (Listed Below) ❑ No Description and location of work completed: Visual weld observations were perfiormed in accordance wifh AWS D1.1 criteria on the following: 1) Outstanding discrepancy on Report#10 12-30-13 Item E) Grid E-F 12-13 has been replaced with new bar joist in accordance with Nucor details. A490 1" hexhead bolts top chord tension, bottom chord snug tight. Bar joist fillet welds too existing and tek fasteners too roof deck. PJo discrepancy noted ; I _ _ _ _ _ _ List tests performed: Visual _ _. _ __ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _. _ ■ Are there any discrepancies noted fram this day's observations? Yes ❑ No � • Are there any outstanding discrepancies on this project? Yes ❑ No � o Ef yes, see attached Summary Sheet. ■ Report given to Contractor: Yes � No ❑ To the best of our knowledge,wark inspected was done in accordance with the approved plans, specifications, and appficable warkmanship provisions of the cu�rent 1BC, except as noted above. S�gR��: ��"�� Graham, Dan Date: 5-13-14 Print Full Name: Daniel P. Graham LE7, No.: 1054095 S1&S2 ' �� lssue Date: 2013f01I01 Rev No.: 0 � � `��`"�� . �.,irb�� c-� . . � � �- �� Summary of Discrepancies Needing Correction or Review g by the Design Engineer or Architect Project Name: Building 300 BL-12-04579A PM Brad McCarter Project Address: Eagan,MN. Structural 5tee1 The following items must he reviewed by the engineer and/or corrected and/or inspected before work can continue in the area. Report No. Report Description Resolution to O/C Status Date Discre anc The following visual observations were performed on bar joists from slab on grade(various areas with damaged chords/lacings). Results as follow to be reviewed by the joist supplier,Nucor: *A) Grid E.8-G 18-19, lst joist east of 18,6th apex from E.8 towards G,north diagonal bent approx. 1/2" *B)Grid H-H.8 10,6th apex from H towards H.8,south Per Nucor fixes � � Items A B,C,D diagonal bent app�. I/2" � closed 5-13- 10 12-30-13 *C) Grid H-H.8 11-12, lst joist west of 12,6th apex from H Item E new bar 14 * towards H.8,north diagonal bent approx. 1/2" joist installed per D) Grid H-H.8 12-13, lst joist east of 12, Sth apex from H Nucor towards H.8,south diagonal bent approx, 1/2° *E) Grid Grid E-F 12-13, lst joist east of 12-13, lst apex from E towards F diagonal to shoe bent approx. 1/2",vertical bent/twisted aprrox 1" (see picture). Also 6th apex from E towards F,south diagonal bent a rox. 1/2". II I � , � MINNESOTA ' , DEPARTMENToFHEALTH f ��`$,. � ,�� Protecting, maintaining and improving the health of all Minnesotans May 6, 2013 Paragon Outlets Eagan, LLC 217 East Redwood Street-21 st Flr Baltimore,Maryland 21202 Dear Ladies and Gentlemen: Subject: Paragon Outlets Cedar Grove,3965 Eagan Outlets Parkway,Eagan,Dakota County, Minnesota,Project No. 130461 Thank you for submitting plans to the Minnesota Department of Health(MDH). We are enclosing a copy of our report covering an examination of plans and specifications on the above designated project. The plans appear to be in general compliance with the standards of this department and have been approved with the following changes.Please see the enclosed report for the changes andJor comments. Ten working days prior to completion of the project, please contact me in order to arrange for a final opening inspection. A final opening inspection can not be conducted until a license application is submitted with the appropriate fees to MDH. Please submit application and fees to: Minnesota Department of Health Environmental Health Services Section 625 Robert Street North, P.O. Box 64495 St. Paul, Minnesota 55164-0495 If you have any questions,please contact me at 651-201-5244 or at barbara.lcrech@state.mn.us� Sincerely, �� Barbara Krech,R.S. Environmental Health Services P.O. Box 64975 St. Paul,Minnesota 55164-0975 barbara.krech@state.mn.us BJK:cb Enclosures CC: Dal Pos Architects,LLC Ms. Peggy Spadafore,Minnesota Department of Health Mr. Dan Disrud,Minnesota Department of Health Mr. Dale Schoeppner,Building Official Mr. William Adams,Plumbing Inspector Mr. Ronald Gnotke,Electrical Inspector General Information: 651-201-5000 • Toll-free: 888-345-0823 • TTY 651-201-5797 • www.health.state.mn.us An equul opportunity employer MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH Division of Environmental Health REPORT ON PLANS Plans and specifications on New Food: Paragon Outlets Cedar Grove,Project No. 130461 Location: 3965 Eagan Outlets Parkway,Eagan,MN 55122,Dakota County Date Approved: May 6,2013 Date Received: March 12,2013 Submitted by: Dal Pos Architects,LLC, 101 North Cl'mton Street- Suite 300, Syracuse,NY 13202, (315)422-0201 Ownership: Paragon Outlets Eagan,LLC,217 East Redwood Street-21 st Flr,Baltimore,MD 21202, (410)856-1812 Scope of Proiect: Build a mall,with a common dishroom used by the food court(5 food establishments)for washing trays. Review also includes indoor recycling rooms and mop rooms. License as a Limited Food Establishment. Approved Finish Schedule Finish Area Walls: Ceilin : Floor&Basecove: Dishwashing room FRP Vinyl coated ceiling Quarry/quarry tiles Indoor recycling FRP Vinyl coated ceiling Sealed concrete rooms tiles Mo rooms FRP Vin Uvin 1 Construction Specifics: Pay particular attention to the bolded items You are responsible for all aspects of the Minnesota Food Code.This code is available at http://www.health.state.mn.us/divs/eh/food/code/index.html. 1. Equipment Standards—General Requirements: Food and beverage equipment shall meet the applicable standards for one of the following: • National Sanitation Foundation(NSF). � Edison Testing Laboratories(ETL)to NSF Standards. • Underwriters Laboratory(LTL)to NSF standards. • Canadian Standards Association(CSA)to NSF Standards. Equipment shall bear the NSF or equivalent sticker and manufacturer information. 2. Ventilation System: Greenheck,model G,Type II hood provided for: dishmachine. All ventilation systems, furnaces and water heaters shall be designed, installed and operated according to chapter 1346 of the Minnesota Mechanical and Fuel Gas Codes, chapter 1305 of the International Building Code and chapter 7510 of the State Fire Code. Paragon Outlets Cedar Grove New Food 130461 Page 2 5/6/13 All rooms shall ha�e sufficient tempered make-up air and e�aust ventilation to keep them free of excessive steam, condensation,vapors, obnoxious or disagreeable odors,smoke and fumes. Sufficient tempered make-up air(at least 55°F)shall be provided and interlocked with ventilation equipment. All open sides of a canopy hood shall overhang equipment by at least six(6)inches. E�aust ventilation systems shall be esigned to prevent grease or condensation from draining or dripping onto food,equipment,utensils,walls, ceiling, linens and single-service articles. Custom fabricated hoods must be m e to NSF International or equivalent standards and bear the sticker and name of the manufacture . Galvanized hoods are not permitted. 3. Warewashing: AM Select Hobart, lectric All floor mounted equipment shall b elevated on six(6) inch NSF legs or casters. I High Temperature Sanitizing Mac ine: A warewashing machine shall be eq ipped with a pressure gauge,transducer or similar device that measures the pressure in the hot wat r rinse cycle. High temperature sanitizing ware wa hing machines shall ha�e space for a minimum of three racks for air-drying utensils. Warewashing Machine General: A warewashing machine shall be pro ided with a data plate affixed to the machine that includes temperature required for the wash an rinse, pressure required in the sanitizing cycle and conveyor speed for conveyor machines and cy le time for stationary rack machines. A warewashing machine shall be equ pped with a temperature measuring device that indicates the temperature of the wash and rinse cy le. Integral drainboards,utensil racks,or tables large enough to accommodate all soiled and clean items shall be provided. All warewashing activities require an area for disposal of garbage and scrapping. 4. Hand Sink: NSF International or equivalent hand sink will be provided in the following areas: • One handsink is installed i the dishwashing room. Each handwashing sink shall be prov ded with hot and cold water through a mixing valve or combination faucet. Paragon Outlets Cedar Grove New Food 130461 Page 3 5/6/13 5. Walls: Wall surfaces in splash zones or high moisture areas such as warewashing,food preparation sinks, handsinks and janitorial sink areas shall be finished with smooth, light colored,durable,non- absorbent materials.Approved materials include: a. A fiberglass re-enforced panel(FRP), or b. Ceramic tile that is smooth and cleanable. c. Stainless steel or equivalent materials. Wood is not an approved material for a wall finish. Utility service lines and pipes shall not be unnecessarily exposed. 6. Floors: Floors in kitchens,bars, other rooms where food is stored,prepared or washed, employee dressing or locker rooms,toilet rooms and janitorial rooms shall be smooth,non-absorbent, durable and easily cleanable. Approved materials include: quarry tile,ceramic tile, and terrazzo or an epoxy flooring system installed on a concrete surface. Epoxy or polyurethane base grout shall be utilized. Where a wall meets the floor it must be properly coved within any foodservice area. A four inch integral base cove shall be installed at all floor/wall junctions. �;�rreet�Iethod Iar�rrec�t�fethnd � � : ;. . �` �` � �,� '� � Concrete flooring is not approved as floor covering in this area. Non-slip tile may not be located underneath equipment. Paragon Outlets Cedar Grove New Food 130461 Page 4 5/6/13 7. Interior Refuse Area: In exterior or attached refuse areas,concrete flooring shall be sealed. Interior garbage storage and refuse rooms shall have smooth and easily cleanable wall,floor and ceiling surfaces and be equipped with hot and cold running water and a floor drain connected to the sanitary sewer. • In the interior recycling rooms,approved floors,walls and ceiling finishes have been provided as detailed in the chart above. • Hot and cold running water and a floor drain is being provided to these rooms for cleaning. 8. Ceitings: Ceilings in kitchens,bars and bar service areas,other rooms where food is stored,prepared,or washed,toilet rooms and janitorial rooms shall be smooth,non-absorbent,durable and easy to clean. Acceptable materials include: a. Vinyl coated acoustic ceiling panels; b. Semi-gloss painted gypsum board(washable); c. Non-absorbent; d. Smooth in texture; and e. No exposed rafters bar joists or trusses are permitted. 9. Janitorial Area: Janitorial areas shall have FRP, ceramic tile or equivalent, stainless steel or cleanable block walls in j the splash area. Unfinished gypsum wallboard is not acceptable in the janitorial area. Provide vacuum breakers at all threaded hose bibs.No wye adapters. Chemical or detergent dispensers shall provide appropriate backflow prevention devices. 10. Plumbing: A plumbing plan approval letter has not been received at this time.Provide at opening inspection evidence that the ptumbing system has been inspected and approval given by the local building official or a representative from the Department of Labor and Industry(DOLn. A separate on-site inspection will be conducted by the Minnesota Department of Labor and Industry plumbing inspector or delegated agent to determine compliance with the Minnesota Plumbing Code. All plumbing equipment shall be installed in accordance with the Minnesota Plumbing Code for a commercial establishxnent. All pipe chases that pass through walls shall be tightly sealed and covered. Paragon Outlets Cedar Grove New Food 130461 Page 5 5/6/13 All utility pipes shall be enclosed 'm walls or ceiling. Utility lines must not be placed on the floor and must be installed at least 6"off the floor. Wye adapters are not permitted. Indirect waste pipes shall not discharge into hand sinks,prep sinks or three-compartment sinks. Telltale drains are required for food service sinks(3 compartment, food preparation and dump sinks) or as required during the plumbing plan review. Grease traps shall be installed in accardance with the Minnesota Plumbing Code, Chapter 4715. 1. Grease trap installation and requirements are determined by the local Building Official or local Sewer Authority. 2. A grease trap shall be easily accessible for cleaning. 3. Location recommendations: Flush mounted units i. Preferred installation ii. Grouted in iii. Do not create an indentation iv. All vent piping for the unit must be buried in the floor.Extra piping through the floor is not permitted under the three comparhnent sink. Floor mounted(sealed to floorl i. Smooth sides,no baffles ii. Provide concrete curb around w/integal cove or a stainless steel cove base iii. At least 6"space surround the unit for cleaning,no storage on top of unit All hot water generating equipment(water heaters)shall be of adequate capacity to meet the needs of the anticipated demand of the establishment. • Hot water heater submitted: Commercial water heater,40 gallons. Provide a stand, 6 inch legs, or collar supplied by the manufacturer for the water heater,water softener,COZ bulk tank, or other floor mounted equipment located in the food preparation or warewashing area. ll. Lighting: Food preparation areas in which food or beverages are prepared, utensils are washed shall provide a minimum of 50 foot-candles of shielded light measured 30 inches above the floor. 12. Employee Lockers,Restrooms and Break areas: Lockers or other suitable facilities shall be provided for the orderly storage of employee's clothing and other possessions. Paragon Outlets Cedar Grove New Food 130461 Page 6 5/6/13 13. Other Code Requirements: For information on the Minnesota Clean Indoor Air Act(MCIAA)contact 651-201-4601 or visit their website at http://www.health.state.mn.us/divs/eh/air. Contact MN Electrical Licensing&Inspection at 651-284-5026 or visit their website at http://www.dli.mn.�ov/CCLDBIectrical.as�for information on electrical requirements and the name of the electrical inspector in your area. Sincerely, �� . Barbara Krech,R.S. Environmental Health Services P.O.Box 64975 St.Paul,Minnesota 55164-0975 barbara.krech@state.mn.us ... A Structural Steel Special Inspection Final Report Cedar Grove Outlet Mall - Pavilion 3905 Eagan Outlets Parkway Eagan, Minnesota Prepared for Paragon Outlets Eagan LLC Project BL-12-04579A July 31, 2014 Braun intertec Corporation � Braun Intertec Corporation Phone:952•995•2000 . iiooi Hampshire Ave S Fax: 952•995•2020 Minneapolis,MN 55438 Web: braunintertec.com July 31, 2014 Project BL-12-04579A Mr. Steven Trainer Paragon Outlets Eagan LLC 217 E Redwood Street, 21st Floor Baltimore, MD 21202 Re: Structural Steel Speciai Inspection Procedural and Final Report Cedar Grove Outlet Mall - Pavilion 3905 Eagan Outlets Parkway Eagan, Minnesota Dear Mr. Trainer: Please find attached to this procedural report the Structural Steel Special Inspection Final Report for the Cedar Grove Outlet Mall Pavilion Project and the supporting Special Inspection Daily Reports. Special Inspection and Testing Procedures The special inspection services were periodically provided by International Code Council (ICC) certified special inspectors in accordance with the requirements of the Minnesota State Building Code, Chapter 17 of the International Building Code (IBC) and the project plans and specifications. The purpose of special inspections is to provide a review of the contractor's work designated by the project structural engineer as needing special inspection under the guidelines of the IBC to determine compliance with the approved construction documents. The special inspector does not have the responsibility or authority to, nor is it the intent of special inspections to have them,judge or modify the construction documents. Only the structural engineer of record can do this. As the special inspections were completed, a Special Inspection Daily Report was prepared to summarize the results of our inspections and testing. A copy of this report was provided to the contractor's site representative for their review and records. Plans and Specifications The plans and project documents available at the site were used for our inspections. Visual Examination of the Field-Made Welds Visual examination of the field welds was conducted in accordance with American Welding Society (AWS) D1.1-2010, Figure 5.4 and Table 6.1 requirements and the requirements of the project plans and specifications. Metal Deck Mechanical Fasteners Observations of the metal deck mechanical fasteners were completed to document the screw fasteners were installed as required in the construction documents and in accordance with the requirements of the manufacturer. Items noted were the placement and the depth of penetration. AA/EOE Providing engineering and environmental solutions since 1957 1 � Paragar Outlets Eagan LLC Project BL-12-04579A luly 31, 2014 Page 2 General In performing its services, Braun Intertec used that level of care and skill ordinarily exercised by reputable members of its profession currently practicing in the same locality. No warranty, express or implied, es made. Thank you for the opportunity to provide the special inspection and testing services for this project. After review of the attached Special Inspection Final Report, if you have any questions or require additional information, please call Dan Graham at 952.995.2524 or Marv Denne at 952.995.2510. Sincerely, BRAUN INTERTEC CORPORATION p !�'�� C.t� � �f G'�'��C�•G .�`.C-�"/� i Daniel P. Gra am ICC Certified Special Inspector-Structural Steel and Welding r ' �� Christopher R. Kehl, PE Principal-Senior Engineer Attachment: Structural Steel Special Inspection Final Report ca Jeff Graham, PE;Thorson Baker&Associates, Inc. Mark Kronbeck; Alliant Engineering, Inc. James Miller; Dalpos Architects& Integrators Craig Novaczyk; City of Eagan Michael Thorson, PE;Thorson Baker&Associates, Inc. Brad McCarter, PE; Braun Intertec s�� , i � ' Braun Intertec Corporation ' Phone:952�995•2000 . iiooi Hampshire Ave S Fax: 952•995•2020 Minneapolis,MN 55438 Web: braunintertec.com Structural Steel Special inspection Final Report City of: Eagan Date: July 31, 2014 Attention: Mr.Steven Trainer Project: Cedar Grove Outlet Mall—Pavilion 3905 Eagan Outlets Parkway Eagan, Minnesota Braun Intertec Project: BL-12-04579A In accordance with the Minnesota State Building Code, Section 1704 of the International Building Code and the agreed-upon scope of services,the required special inspections and testing have been provided for the following items: Structural Field Welding. The welded connections detailed in the attached Special Inspection Daily Reports were observed in general accordance with the requirements of the project plans and specifications.There are currently no outstanding or unresolved structural welding-related issues. Metal Deck Fasteners. The metal deck fasteners and side-lap fasteners detailed in the attached Special Inspection Daily Reports were observed in general accordance with the requirements of the project plans and specifications. There are currently no outstanding or unresolved decking-related issues. Conclusion Based upon the inspections conducted,the testing performed and the attached reports, it is our professional judgment that, to the best of our knowledge, the inspected work was performed and completed in accordance with the approved plans, specifications, structural-engineer-provided modifications and applicable workmanship provisions of the Minnesota State Building Code and the International Building Code. Inspecting Firm: Braun Intertec Corporation �a��°�� `,°°gp��4,o,. � �,��C� �`�::�`�"�5``'�;;.. � ,� �,;.» •.�C)jo f�� I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report :��.�oB "'�"". was prepared by me or under my direct supervision ' m'�a-�;�0�'��R.;r�=�: •�g i�E�st...P� :�M:. and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer �.:r�� ,: under the laws of the State of Minnesota. ;.��=`_ ��aa :cc�.; s�. 4s�',;. :� `- ,,r,F�� I�. �� / _ � ,Rk° .. _. `ts�w�� 'p��fi"�L°e.�v��a a x:,a.;.�� '0 Christopher R. Kehl, PE Principal-Senior Engineer License Number: 43459 July 31, 2014 Attachments Special Inspection Daily Reports 1 and 2 AA/EOE Prouiding engineering and envfronmental soluriotts since i957 � � � � '��`�� j - �� {ssue Date: 2013l01/01 Rev No.: 0 ;�� , �;; � �� €��' - �,_,� Y � _ �- � � � Speciai Inspection Daily Report City of Eagan, MN. Page 1 of 1 Report No.: StructuraE St�el#1 �ate of this Re�ort: 3-03-14 Project Name: Pavillion Project No.: BL-12-04579A Project Address: Building 100 to Building 300 Client: Paragon Outfets Eagan Client Project No.: Weather: Partly Cioudy PM Brad McCarter Temperature: 10 ° F Type of Inspection: Inspection Coverage: ❑ Continuous ❑ Masonry ❑ Rebar Placement ❑ Foundations ❑ Special Cases: � Periodic �Welding 8� Bolting ❑ Concrete ❑ Fireproofing ❑ Piles& Piers ❑ Tendon Placement ❑Soils Did the architect or engineer authorize changes to City-approved plans? ❑Yes (Listed Below) ❑ No Description and location of work compieted: _ _. _ _. . __ Visual weld observations were performed in accordance vvith AWS D1.1 criteria on the following: 1) Bar joist fillet wetds at Pavillions Roof Level per Nucor Vulcraft details and 1/S6.1. No discrepancy noted List tests perFormed: Visttal ___ _ _ ■ Are there any discrepancies noted from this day's observations? Yes ❑ No � ■ Are there any outstanding discrepancies on this project? Yes ❑ No � � !f yes, see attached Summary Sheet. ■ Report given to Gontrac#or: Yes � No ❑ To the best of our knowledge, work inspected was done in accordance with the approved plans, specifications, and applicable workmanship provisions of the current IBC, except as noted above. iigned: � Date: 3-03-14 Print Full Name: Daniel P. Graham I.D. No.: 1054095 S1&S2 � � =� � � � ` �� Issue Date: 2013/01l01 Rev Na.: 0 , � �� = � � . �°� � � -°� � ��-��, �� ; ',� '� � ;�. �� Special inspection Daily Report City of Eagan, MN. Page 1 of 1 l2eport No.: Structural Steef#2 Da4e of this Report: 3-21-14 Project Name: Pavillion Project Na.: BL-12-04579A Project Address: Building 100 to Building 300 Client: Paragon Outlefs Eagan Client Project No.: Weather: Partly Cloudy PM Brad McCarter Temperature: 40 ° F Type of Inspection: Inspection Coverage: ❑ Continuous ❑ Masonry ❑ Rebar Placement ❑ Foundations ❑ Special Cases: � Periodic �Welding 8�Bolting ❑ Concrete ❑ Fireproofing ❑ Piles& Piers ❑Tendon Placement ❑Soils Did the architect or engineer authorize changes to City-approved plans? ❑Yes (Listed Below) ❑ No Description and location of work completed: Visual weid observations were performed in accordance with AWS D1.1 criteria on the following: j Hilti pin fasteners and side lap screws on Roof Deck on Pavillion Roofs per Hilti drawings. No discrepancy noted 2} Tube steel fillet welds at Pavillion Roof Level per sheet S6.1 and SER direction. No discrepancy noted . _ _ List tests performed: Visual _ _ _ _ ___ _ _ _ _ _ ___. ■ Are there any discrepancies noted from this day's observations? Yes ❑ No � • Are there any outstanding discrepancies on this project? Yes ❑ No � � !f yes, see attached Summary Sheet. ■ Report given to Contractor: Yes � No ❑ To the best of our knowledge, work inspected was done in accordance with the approved plans, spec�cations, and ^pplicable workmanship provisions of the current IBC, except as noted above. Signed: Date: 3-21-14 Print Full Name: Daniel P. Graham I.D. No.: 1054095 S1&S2