The URL can be used to link to this page

3985 Eagan Outlets Pkwy Use BLUE or BLACK Ink For Office Use j - S l lAJ` (rC I I j ` VA v I Permit City of Eakan I Permit Fee: 3830 Pilot Knob Road I ? I Eagan MN 55122 I Date Received: I Phone: (651) 675-5675 Fax: (651) 675-5694 I Staff: A6 I I 2 013 COMMERCIAL PLUMBING PERMIT APPLICATION ❑ Please submit two (2) sets of plans with all commercial applications. Date: Site Address: MAIL&,,s. r#5;t,o Tenant: Suite Property Owner Name: Phone: Name: Ua~Gn IPIstn-b►'M Pr t- License Contractor Address: /.~lS S' ~11-r• $l S City: 14-0ko%j Stater P! Zip: Phone: 9-f2- 43k' 9300 Email: 14w a (JOicA (1e"b1 . Cc," Type of Work -<New -Replacement _Repair -Rebuild - Modify Space -Work in R.O.W. ~ Description of work: COMMERCIAL New Construction Modify Space Irrigation System yes / _ no) RPZ / _ PVB) • Rain sensors required on irrigation systems Permit Type • Avg. GPM (2" turbo required unless smaller size allowed by Public Works) Meters Call (651) 675-5646 to verity that tests passed prior to picking up meter. Domestic: Size & Type I a# Fire: 1 Avg. GPM High demand devices? _Yes No Flushometers Yes No COMMERCIAL FEES Contract Value $ ~C~ , vG n X.01 $55.00 Permit Fee Minimum _ $ Permit Fee *If contract value is LESS than $10,010, Surcharge = $5.00 = $ Surcharge* **If contract value is GREATER than $10,010, Surcharge = Contract Value x $0.0005 ***If the project valuation is over $1 million, please call for Surcharge = $ TOTAL FEE Following fees apply when installing a new lawn irrigation system $ Water Permit Contact the City's Engineering Department, (651) 675-5646, for required fee amounts. $ Treatment Plant $ Water Supply & Storage $ State Surcharge _ $ TOTAL FEE CALL BEFORE YOU DIG. Call Gopher State One Call at (651) 454-0002 for protection against underground utility damage. Call 48 hours before you intend to dig to receive locates of underground utilities. www.gopherstateonecall.org I hereby acknowledge that this information is complete and accurate; that the work will be in conformance with the ordinances and codes of the City of Eagan; that I understand this is not a permit, but only an application for a permit, and work is not to start without a permit; that the work will be in accordance with the approved plan in the case of work which requires a review and approval of plans. x 1(Am- v U!~, x 54 Applicant's Printed Name Applicant's Signature FOR OFFICE USE Approved By: Date: Required, Inspections: --kUnder Ground - ~ughdn _k7Vir Test Gas Testk! Final PRV Required: _ Yes No Page 1 of 3 Use BLUE or BLACK Ink 2013 SEWER AND WATER CONNECTION AND AVAILABILITY CHARGES EXISTING COMMERCIAL PROPERTY (if applicable) Date: FOR OFFICE USE ONLY Property Owner: _ PRV required _ City R-O-W Permit Address: Phone Number: _ County R-O-W Permit Plumber: Contact Name: SEWER WATER Sewer Service Water Service Sewer lateral charge Water lateral charge Sewer trunk Water trunk City SAC @ $100/unit Water supply storage MCES SAC @ $2,435/unit Receipt , Date: Receipt Date: Treatment Plant @ $801/unit Permit Fee $60.00 Permit Fee $60.00 State Surcharge $5.00 State Surcharge $5.00 TOTAL: 'Plumbing Permit Required - water meter to be acquired with building permit TOTAL: _ SEWER & WATER Sewer Service Water Service Sewer lateral charge Water lateral charge Sewer trunk Water trunk City SAC MCES SAC Receipt # Date Water supply & storage Receipt # Date Treatment plant Permit Fee $120.00 State Surcharge $5.00 `Plumbing Permit Required - water meter to be acquired with building permit TOTAL: Number of SAC units is determined by the Metropolitan Council Environmental Services (651) 602-1000. Sanitary Sewer Trunk Connection Charge applies if not charged sewer trunk by assessment in the past. 1-5 SAC units 1,780.00 per SAC unit r-----------------I 6-10 SAC units 8,900.00 plus 445.00 per SAC unit over 5 1 For Office Use 11+ SAC units 11,130.00 plus 178.00 per SAC unit over 10 I Permit I I I I Permit Fee: I I I I Date Received: L I I I I Staff: Cc: City of Eagan Finance Department Page 2 of 3 Use bLUE or 16LA ;K Ink - - _ _ _ _ _ l- For Office Use I I t I -7 Permit I City Eap z I i Permit Fee: I 3830 Pilot Knob Road i 2 I Eagan MN 55122 I Phone: (651) 675-5675 { Date Received: C I Fax: (651) 675-5694 staff: I 2013 MECHANICAL PERMIT APPLICATION 0 Please submit two (2) sets of plans # all corn morcial applications. i' Date:. _ t Site Address: Tenant: _ Suite Resident/Owner Name: - ' - - Phone: Addressl City r 21, i.,_ Name: license Contractor Address City: i State 11D: - Phone F ~ contact: Email- New Replacement Additional Ali, +-ation Lemolition i Type of Work Description of work. . x. ,.nx.,., NOTE: Roof mounted and ground mounted mechanical equipment is required to be screened by City Code. Please contact the Mechanical Inspector for information on permitted screening methods. RESIDENTIAL COMMERCIAL _ Furnace New Construction Interior Improvement Permit Type -Air Conditioner Install Piping _ Processed _ Air Exchanger _ Gas Exterior HVAC Unit _ Heat Pump I _ Under Above ground Tank Install Remove) Other RESIDENTIAL FEES i $60.00 Minimum Add or alteration to an existing unit (includes $5.00 State Surcharge) $100.00 Residential New (includes $5.00 State Surcharge) _ TOTAL FEE i I COMMERCIAL FEES Contract Value $ l 6 .~U X.01 $55.00 Permit Fee Minimum I $70.00 Underground tank i nstallationlrem oval = $ Permit Fee r *If contract value is LESS than $10,010, Surcharge = $5.00 **If contract value is GREATER than $10,010, Surcharge = Contract Value x $0.0005 $ Surcharge* s ***If the project valuation is over $1 million, please call for Surcharge = $ TOTAL FEE I hereby acknowledge that th€s information is complete and accurate; that the work will be in conformance with the ordinances and codes of the City of Eagan; that I understand this is not a permit, but only an application for a permit, and work is not to start without a permit; that the work will be in accordance with the approved plan in the case of work which requires a review and approval of plans. s Applicant: Printed Name FOR OFFICE USE Required Inspections: Reviewed By: Date: Underground Rough In Air Test Gas Service Test In-floor Heat Final HVAC Screening City of Eapft 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan MN 55122 Phone: (651) 675-5675 Fax: (651) 675-5694 1. sg_HRil7 Use BLUE or BLACK Ink For Office Use t 1 (i # Pennit Fee: Date Received. Staff: 6H0» 2013 COMMERCIAL BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION Date: May 16, 2013 Site Address: 3985 Eagan Outlets Parkway (Building 500) Tenant Name: Paragon Outlets Cedar Grove (Tenant is: X New / Existing) Suite #: Former Tenant: N/A Name: Paragon Outlets Eagan LLC. Phone: 410-856-1812 Address / City / Zip: c/o Paragon Outlet Partners LLC. , 217 East Redwood St. - 21st fir. Baltimore, MD 21202 Applicant is: X Owner Contractor Description of work: A new 44,302 s.f. (GBA) shell retail structure including site work Construction Cost: $4,410,000 Name. Ryan Companies US, Inc. Address: 50 South 10th Street, Suite 300 State: MN Zip: 55403-2012 License #: N/A City: Minneapolis Phone. 612-492-4312 Contact: Brian Kombrink Email: Brian.Kombrink@RyanCompanies.com Name: Dal Pos Architects, LLC/Taras Pawliw, AIA Registration #: 43971 Address: 101 N. Clinton Stree, Suite 300 City: Syracuse State: NY Zip: 13202 Phone 315-422-0201 Contact Person: Dennis E. Cox, AIA Email. dcox@dalpos.com 6;(,11,tA.L.1 Etakkt°' Licensed plumberinstalling new sewer/water service; VoGOT1 Prumumg NOTE: Plans and supporting docurnents that you submit are considered tii,liWONklattrirtatkifigiPeitiaieV wfiftp#0.014010-L *Olaaakledi*khoav-W*kOOg:roogorh*jg(t7oitloaoi*that w90,0pgrOti#10k.City o , conclude that the are trade secrets. wagetimgoothia2 f1) ivs -41.4 - Phone #: -9-52-93R-9300— CALL BEFORE YOU DIG. Call Gopher State One Call at (651) 454-0002 for protection against underground utility damage. Call 48 hours before you intend to dig to receive locates of underground utilities. www,gopherstateonecall.oro I hereby acknowledge that this information is complete and accurate; that the work will be in conformance with the ordinances and codes of the City of Eagan; that I understand this is not a permit, but only an application for a permit, and work is not to start without a permit; that the work will be in accordance with the approved plan in the case of work which requires review and approval of plans. xs1v ko"te.4.Pe. Applicant's Printed Name Applicant's Signature Page 1 of 3 SUB TYPES Foundation Commercial / Industrial Apartments Miscellaneous W,PRK TYPES / New Addition Alteration Replace Salon Owner Change DESCRIPTION Valuation Plan Review (25% 100% v) Census Code # of Units # of Buildings Type of Construction 3 C1135 Okkttt+S DO NOT wRitE BELOW THIS LINE Public Facility Accessory Building Greenhouse / Tent Antennae Interior Improvement Exterior Improvement Repair Water Damage 1 .$ awl Occupancy Code Edition Zoning Stories Square Feet Length Width RE9UIRED INSPECTIONS Footings (New Building) Footings (Deck) ,Footings (Addition) V Foundation Drain Tile /Roof: Decking vInsulation & Water /Final Framing [replace: Rough In Air Test Final insulation Meter Size: Final C/O Inspection: Schedule Fire Marshal to be present: Reviewed By: Building Inspector Exterior Alteration -Apartments Exterior Alteration -Commercial Exterior Alteration -Public Facility Siding Reroof Windows Fire Repair Demolish Building* Demolish Interior Demolish Foundation RetainingWall *Demolition of entire building — give PCA handout to applicant 2-007 Aci$g PP / 45; 4 / \--// heetrock MCES System SAC Units City Water Booster Pump PRV Fire Sprinklers Final / C.O. Required Final / No C.O. Required /Other f[f 577/1/9/V‘ l5/Lerreit, Pool: Footings Air/Gas Tests Final VSiding: Stucco Lath Stone Lath N./Brick Windows /Retaining Wall %V Erosion Control Yes No Reviewed By: , Planning COMMERCIAL FEES Base Fee Surcharge Plan Review MCES SAC City SAC S&W Permit & Surcharge Treatment Plant Treatment Plant (irrigation) Park Dedication Trail Dedication Water Quality ; citit .eto 117.37 .of 347 5 -7,5 -.0 -- Too• 12-, 0/5.0-u Water Quality Water Supply & Storage (WAC) Storm Sewer Trunk Sewer Trunk Water Trunk Street Lateral Street Water Lateral Other: TOTAL 93, ciVo, Page 2 of 3 Dale Schoeppner Chief Building Official City of Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55122-1810 Dear Mr. Schoeppner: May 6, 2013 The Metropolitan Council Environmental Services (MCES) Division has determined the SAC to be charged for the wastewater capacity demand for Paragon Outlets building jato be located at 3985 Eagan Outlets Pkwy. within the City of Eagan. The City will be charged no SAC Units for this project, as determined below. The Council understands this building is speculative retail. Charges: Retail (speculative) 43416 sq. ft. @ 3000 sq. ft. /SAC SAC Units 14.47 or 15 At the time the finishing permits are issued, if the use changes from its speculative use to a different use, then the SAC assignment needs to be reviewed based on that change. The business information was provided to MCES by the applicant at this time. It is also the City's responsibility to substantiate the business use and size at the time of the final inspection. If there is a change in use or size, a redetermination will need to be made. If you have any questions, call me at 651- 602-1118 or email karon.cappaert@metc.state.mn.us. Karon Cappaert SAC Program Technical Specialist Environmental Services Division KC:kg: 130506B1 Determination expiration: 05/06/2015 cc: J. Nye, MCES Salem LaHood Amy Griffin, Eagan (email) 390 Robert Street North 1 St. Paul, MN 55101-1805 Phone 651.602.1000 1 Fax 651.602.1550 1 TTY 651.291.0904 1 metrocouncil.org An Equal Opportunity Employer MLTRO NOLLT l City of �aoa� �` ‘(°) 3830 Pilot Knob Road RECEIVED Eagan MN 55122 Phone: (651) 675-5675 ,AN 2O' Fax: (651) 675-5694 Use BLUE or BLACK Ink For Office Use LPermit #: -IC e?Li.-No Permit Fee: Date Received: Staff: 2014 FIRE SUPPRESSION SYSTEMS PERMIT APPLICATION* Date: 01108/Z0144 Site Address: _ 3 LT 6.47arf Owl -lei -5 Parkway Tenant: Suite #: J Property Owner Name: Phone: Address / City / Zip: Applicant is: Owner Contractor Type of Work Description of work: Wei. 5P,%hkte.- 5y, kc Fr% Construction Cost: 140,700 Estimated Completion Date: O11/2014/ Contractor Name: Ahurn Pre Pn itti.ton License #: C039 Address: 13705 24,01 Ave, 5t411.e 110 City: Ptymov. th State: M A% Zip: 4-5-414 1 Phone: (743) 2%8 - 0415 Contact: Chat -tic AV(; /I to" Email: Cm► fl ee 69 aitern4re . (pm FIRE PERMIT TYPE X Sprinkler System (# of heads IVO Standpipe WORK TYPE X New Addition _ Fire Pump _ _ Alterations Remodel Other: Other: DESCRIPTION OF WORK: Commercial Residential Educational FEES $55.00 Permit Fee Minimum Contract Value $ S-3 1 7 _..01 = $3`7, rS7 Permit Fee If contract value is LESS than $10,010, Surcharge = $5.00 **If contract value is GREATER than $10,010, Surcharge = Contract Value ***If the project valuation is over $1 million, please call for Surcharge �,q x $0.0005 = $ —°4,0 " f Surcharge* _ = $ TOTAL FEE 3/4" Displacement Fire Meter - $260.00 = $0 , Fire Meter = $ - . �D'LLI TOTAL FEE equirements: 2 complete sets of drawings and specifications, cut sheets on materials and components to be used I hereby apply for a Fire Suppression System permit and acknowledge that the information is complete and accurate; that the work will be in conformance with the ordinances and codes of the City of Eagan and with the Minnesota Building/Fire Codes; that I understand this is not a permit, but only an application for a permit, and work is not to start without a permit; that the work will be in accordance with the approved plan in the case of work which requires a review and approval of plans. x �h ar t<e /V); Applicant's Printed Name Applicant's Signature FOR OFFICE US REQUIRED INSPECTIOIiS Hydrostatic Trip Conditions of Issuance: pain Test Central Station Permit Reviewed b ty of Eaall 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan MN 55122 Phone: (651) 675-5675 Fax: (651) 6755694 Use BLUE or BLACK Ink For Office Use Penn* I i.a 1 3o Permit Fee: WO , C Date Received: Staff: J 2014 COMMERCIAL FIRE ALARM PERMIT APPLICATION* Date: j — (( ( r.Site Address: g cl S E A.5.4." OuT (..eT a'r (:)A r k w r4y Tenant ?eve e1/4 ( ' ci T (— T jv‘ H G c Suite ale: Phone: A g4e.- T -e a r5y Cp:u+r License: T S cl 1577 DESCRIPTION OF WORK: FEES mmerciai _ Residential _ Educational $55.00 Permit Fee Minimum "If contract value is LESS than $10,010, Surcharge = $5.00 **If contract value is GREATER than $10,010, Surcharge = Contract Value x $0.0005 **if the project valuation is over $1 million, please call for Surcharge Contract Value $ ` \ )1k.01 _ $ r Permit Fee = $ Surcharge* = S (1),0 TOTAL FEE *Requirements: 2 complete sets of drawings and specifications, cut sheets on materials and components to be used I hereby apply for a Fire Alarm permit and acknowledge that the information is complete and accurate; that the work will be in conformance with the ordinances and codes of the City of Eagan and with the Minnesota Building/Fire Codes; that I understand this is not a permit, but only an appkcation for a permit, and work Is not to start without a permit; that the work will be In accordance with the approved plan in the case of work which requres a review and approval of plans. x S4- VZ AA A Applicant's Printed Name icant's Signature (nr\eJ,._ .. a 105372 Use BLU� or BLACK Ink CALL FOR CREDIT CARD PAYMENT i-----------------, 612.843.3210 � For Office Use � . 1�D�'G 1^� I �� `i' I C�� n n �n I Permit#: I y 1 1 l� 1 1 j G� I +Ct� � Permit Fee: � 3830 Pilot Knob Road ��,'�`1� � I Eagan MN 55122 �� Date Received: � Phone:(651)675-5675 Fax:(651)675-5694 �� '� � I � Staff: � `��_____��__��J 2014 FIRE SUPPRE f�S10N SYSTEMS PERMIT APPLICATION* oate: 6/10/14 site Address: 3985 Ea�an Outlets Parkwa� Tenant: Adldas ' Suite#: 500 Name: Phone: Property Owner Address/City�Zip: Applicant is: Owner Contractor Type of Work Description ofwork: Inst modify coverage for �rotection in new tenant spaces Construction Cost: $4000.00 Estimated Completion Date: 7/1/14 Name: Ahern Fire Protection �icense#: C039 Contractor ` Address: 13705 26th Ave #110 �;ry: Plymouth � State: Mn1 zip: 55441 Phone: 763.268.0515 co�tact: Ray Polos Ema;i: rpolos@ahernfire.com FIRE PERMIT TYPE WORK TYPE X Sprinkler System(#of heads 19) New _Addition Fire Pump _Standpipe XAlterations _Remodel Other: Other: DESCRIPTION OF WORK: X Commercial Residential Educational FEES Contract Value$ x.01 � $55.00 Permit Fee Minimum =$ Permit Fee 'If contract value is LESS than$10,010, Surcharge=$5.00 `*If contract value is GREATER than$10,010, Surcharge=Contract Value x$0.0005 -$ Surcharge* "`*If the project valuation is over$1 million, please call for Surcharge _$ 60.00 TOTAL FEE 3/4" Displacement Fire Meter-$260.00 =$ Fire Meter � _$ TOTAL FEE � "Requirements: 2 complete sets of drawings and specifications,cut sheets on materials and components to be used I hereby apply for a Fire Suppression System permit and acknowledge that the information is complete and accurate;that the work will be in conformance with the ordinances and codes of the City of Eagan and with the Minnesota Building/Fire Codes;that I understand this is not a permit,but only an application for a permit,and work is not to start without a permit;that the work will be in accordance with the approved plan in the case of work which requires a review and approval of plans. X Barb Barnes 612.843.3210 X y`' - -� ApplicanYs Printed Name ApplicanYs Signature I ,. . . ��38�� FOR OFFICE USE REQUIRED INSPECTIONS Hydrostatic Flow Alarm Drain Test �ugh In Trip Pump Test Central'Station `, �Final Conditions oflssuance: c ! Permit Reviewed by• Da#e:' �/�/� Clt of �a a� ��o � � TO: Scott Peterson, Building Inspections #'�Q 20 Jon Hohenstein, Community Development Mike Ridley, Planning Darrin Bramwell, Fire Marshaf Russ Matthys, Engineering John Gorder, Engineering Aaron Nelson, Engineering Leon Weiland, Engineering Jon Eaton, Utilities Eric Macbeth, Maintenance Gregg Hove, Maintenance Lt. Mike Fineran, Police FROM: Craig Novaczyk, Senior Building Inspector DATE: 5/15/2013 RE: Ptan Review For: Paragon Building #500 3985 Eagan Outlets Parkway The plans are in our plan review section for your review and comment. Please return this form to my attention with your signed comments within 7 days. Please indicate any concerns you have with these plans and resolve these issues with the affected parties. If you are requesting that issuance of the building permit be held, please submit the proper"hold request"form to me. Comments: �'L°.�.tP� � J ��s� l-�2�� Indicate below any fees that are to be collected with the building permit. Amount ❑ Yes ❑ No Landscape Security Required Zoning: ❑ Yes ❑ No Water Quality Dedication Meter Size: ❑ Yes ❑ No Park Dedication ❑ Yes ❑ No Trail Dedication ❑ Yes ❑ No Tree Dedication ❑ Yes ❑ No PRV Required Signature Date G:\Building Inspections\FORMS\Commercial Bldgs Final & Plan Review Letters ' �e�o �lt 0� �� I1 � � TO: v �cott Peterson, Building Inspections # 22 +�Jon Hohenstein, Community Development „d'Mike Ridley, Planning �%Darrin Bramwell, Fire Marshal Russ Matthys, Engineering John Gorder, Engineering Aaron Nelson, Engineering /Leon Weiland, Engineering `'fJon Eaton, Utilities ✓Eric Macbeth, Maintenance �'�Gregg Hove, Maintenance Lt. Mike Fineran, Police FROM: Craig Novaczyk, Senior Building Inspector DATE: 5/15/2013 RE: Plan Review For: Paragon Building #500 3985 Eagan Outlets Parkway The plans are in our plan review section for your review and comment. Please return this form to my attention with your signed comments within 7 days. Please indicate any concerns you have with these plans and resolve these issues with the affected parties. If you are requesting that issuance of the building permit be held, please submit the proper"hold request"form to me. Comments: Indicate below any fees that are to be collected with the building permit. Amount ❑ Yes ❑ No Landscape Security Required Zoning: ❑ Yes ❑ No Water Quality Dedication Meter Size: ❑ Yes ❑ No Park Dedication ❑ Yes ❑ No Trail Dedication ❑ Yes ❑ No Tree Dedication ❑ Yes ❑ No PRV Required Signature Date G:\Building Inspections\FORMS\Commercial Bldgs Final & Plan Review Letters Clt of �a a� �e�o � � TO: , Scott Peterson, Building Inspections #`2�2' Jon Hohenstein, Community Development 2v Mike Ridley, Planning Darrin Bramwell, Fire Marshal Russ Matthys, Engineering John Gorder, Engineering Aaron Nelson, Engineering Leon Weiland, Engineering Jon Eaton, Utilities Eric Macbeth, Maintenance Gregg Hove, Maintenance Lt. Mike Fineran, Police FROM: Craig Novaczyk, Senior Building Inspector DATE: 5/15/2013 RE: Plan Review For: Paragon Building #500 3985 Eagar� Outlets Parkway The plans are in our plan review section for your review and comment. Please return this form to my attention with your signed comments within 7 days. Please indicate any concerns you have with these plans and resolve these issues with the affected parties. If you are requesting that issuance of the building permit be held, please submit the proper"hold request"form to me. Comments: Indicate below any fees that are to be collected with the building permit. Amount ❑ Yes ❑ No Landscape Security Required Zoning: ❑ Yes No Water Quality Dedication Meter Size: ❑ Yes No Park Dedication ❑ Yes ❑ No Trail Dedication ❑ Yes ❑ No Tree Dedication ❑ s ❑ No PRV Re ired �� at Date G:\Building Inspections\FORMS\Commercial Bldgs Final & Plan Review Letters Clt of �a a� �e�o � � TO: Scott Peterson, Building Inspections #� Jon Hohenstein, Community Development � Mike Ridley, Planning Darrin Bramwell, Fire Marshal Russ Matthys, Engineering John Gorder, Engineering Aaron Nelson, Engineering Leon Weiland, Engineering Jon Eaton, Utilities Eric Macbeth, Maintenance Gregg Hove, Maintenance Lt. Mike Fineran, Police FROM: Craig Novaczyk, Senior Building Inspector DATE: 5/15/2013 RE: Plan Review For: Paragon Building #500 3985 Eagan Outlets Parkway The plans are in our plan review section for your review and comment. Please return this form to my attention with your signed comments within 7 days. Please indicate any concerns you have with these plans and resolve these issues with the affected parties. If you are requesting that issuance of the building permit be held, please submit the proper"hold request" form to me. Comments: � �� - Indicate below any fees that are to be collected with the building permit. Amount ❑ Yes ❑ No Landscape Security Required Zoning: ❑ Yes ❑ No Water Quality Dedication Meter Size: ❑ Yes ❑ No Park Dedication ❑ Yes ❑ No Trail Dedication ❑ Yes ❑ No Tree Dedication ❑ Yes ❑ N PR Re red !3 Signature Date G:\Building Inspections\FORMS\Commercial Bldgs Final & Plan Review Letters I"�� Clt of �a a� �e�o � � TO: Scott Peterson, Building Inspections #�� Jon Hohenstein, Community Development Mike Ridley, Planning Darrin Bramweil, Fire Marshal Russ Matthys, Engineering John Gorder, Engineering Aaron Nelson, Engineering Leon Weiland, Engineering Jon Eaton, Utilities Eric Macbeth, Maintenance Gregg Hove, Maintenance Lt. Mike Fineran, Police FROM: Craig Novaczyk, Senior Building Inspector DATE: 5/15/2013 RE: Plan Review For: Paragon Building #500 3985 Eagan Outlets Parkway The plans are in our plan review section for your review and comment. Please return this form to my attention with your signed comments within 7 days. Please indicate any concerns you have with these plans and resolve these issues with the affected parties. If you are requesting that issuance of the building permit be held, please submit the proper"hold request" form to me. Comments: �` I `� ��v�. �,� Indicate below any fees that are to be collected with the building permit. Amount �;5� ❑ Yes I�' No Landscape Security Required Zoning: It�.IrJ ❑ Yes �, No Water Quality Dedication Meter Size: ❑ Yes � No Park Dedication ❑ Yes �No Trail Dedication ❑ Yes L� No Tree Dedication ❑ Yes ❑ No PRV Required �_. � `�I�� I �� Signature Date ` G:\Building Inspections\FORMS\Commercial Bldgs Final & Plan Review Letters Clt of �a a� �e�o� � � TO: Scott Peterson, Building Inspections #�� Jon Hohenstein, Community Development Mike Ridley, Planning Darrin Bramwell, Fire Marshal Russ Matthys, Engineering John Gorder, Engineering Aaron Neison, Engineering Leon Weiland, Engineering Jon Eaton, Utilities Eric Macbeth, Maintenance Gregg Hove, Maintenance Lt. Mike Fineran, Police FROM: Craig Novaczyk, Senior Building Inspector DATE: 5/15/2013 RE: Plan Review For: Paragon Building #500 3985 Eagan Outlets Parkway The plans are in our plan review section for your review and comment. Please return this form to my attention with your signed comments within 7 days. Please indicate any concerns you have with these plans and resolve these issues with the affected parties. If you are requesting that issuance of the building permit be held, please submit the proper"hold request"form to me. Comments: Indicate below any fees that are to be collected with the building permit. Amount ❑ Yes ❑ No Landscape Security Required Zoning: ❑ Yes ❑ No Water Quality Dedication Meter Size: ❑ Yes ❑ No Park Dedication ❑ Yes ❑ No Trail Dedication ❑ Yes ❑ No Tree Dedication ❑ s ❑ No PRV Required - .��„� � �'/.3 Signature Date G:1Building Inspections\FORMS\Commercial Bldgs Final & Plan Review Letters Clt of �a a� �e�o � � TO: Scott Peterson, Building Inspections #�� Jon Hohenstein, Community Development Mike Ridley, Planning Darrin Bramwell, Fire Marshal Russ Matthys, Engineering John Gorder, Engineering Aaron Nelson, Engineering Leon Weiland, Engineering Jon Eaton, Utilities Eric Macbeth, Maintenance Gregg Hove, Maintenance Lt. Mike Fineran, Police FROM: Craig Novaczyk, Senior Building Inspector DATE: 5/15/2013 RE: Plan Review For: Paragon Building #500 3985 Eagan Outlets Parkway The plans are in our plan review section for your review and comment. Please return this form to my attention with your signed comments within 7 days. Please indicate any concerns you have with these plans and resolve these issues with the affected parties. If you are requesting that issuance of the building permit be held, please submit the proper"hold request" form to me. Comments: Indicate below any fees that are to be collected with the building permit. Amount ❑ Yes ❑ No Landscape Security Required Zoning: ❑ Yes ❑ No Water Quality Dedication Meter Size: ❑ Yes ❑ No Park Dedication ❑ Yes ❑ No Trail Dedication ❑ Y s ❑ No Tree Dedication ' ❑ Y s ❑ No PRV Required , _sl 3a �� S' na ure Date G:\B ding Inspections\FORMS\Commercial Bldgs Final & Plan Review Letters Clt of �a a� ��o � � TO: Scott Peterson, Building Inspections # 22 Jon Hohenstein, Community Development Mike Ridley, Planning Darrin Bramwell, Fire Marshal Russ Matthys, Engineering John Gorder, Engineering Aaron Nelson, Engineering Leon Weiland, Engineering Jon Eaton, Utilities Eric Macbeth, Maintenance Gregg Hove, Maintenance Lt. Mike Fineran, Police FROM: Craig Novaczyk, Senior Building Inspector DATE: 5/15/2013 RE: Plan Review For: Paragon Building #500 3985 Eagan Outlets Parkway The plans are in our plan review section for your review and comment. Please return this form to my attention with your signed comments within 7 days. Please indicate any concerns you have with these plans and resolve these issues with the affected parties. If you are requesting that issuance of the building permit be held, please submit the proper "hold request" form to me. Comments: � �� GX �-��-� a /'��!sz S cf /J�'7 h�'�o<�t S /�GG � Indicate below any fees that are to be collected with the building permit. Amount ❑ Yes ❑ No Landscape Security Required Zoning: ❑ Yes ❑ No Water Quality Dedication Meter Size: ❑ Yes ❑ No Park Dedication ❑ Yes ❑ No Trail Dedication ❑ Yes ❑ No Tree Dedication ❑ Yes ❑ No PRV Required �� /z.-6 //3 Signature Date G:\Building Inspections\FORMS\Commercial Bldgs Final & Plan Review Letters Envelope Compliance Test Results Building_500 Project Summary Information Name:Building_500 Address:3985 Eagan Outlets Parkway CitylState/Zip: Eagan, MN Climate Location: Eagan, Minnesota Standard EnvStd climate data is used for compliance Criteria Table: 6A Floor Area(ft2);45336 Gross Wall Area(ftZ): 17391 Window Area(ft?):4176 Window Wali Ratio;0.240 Gross Roof Area(ft2):45336 Skylight Area(ftz):0 Skylight Roof Ratio:0.000 Door Area(ftZ):0 Com liance Summa --PASSES EPF Pro osed Standard Mar in Roofs 3605 5407 1802 Skylights 0 0 0 Exterior Walls and Windows 6640 6980 341 Below-Grade Walis 0 0 0 Floors 0 0 0 Slabs 0 0 0 Daylighting Potentiai 9618 9836 218 Total 19862 22223 2361 O a ue.Construction Schedule Code Descri tion Net Area/Len th U-factor HC R-Cav R-Shth C-1 Metal Framing-Metal Framing-3.5 in. (89 mm) 13215 0.055 n.a. 13.0 10.0 studs at 16 in.(400 mm)o.c.-Wall,Above Grade Rcav-13+Rshth-10 G2 lnsuiation Entirely Above Deck or Mass- 45336 0.042 n.a. OA 23.0 Insulation Entirely Above Deck or Mass-Roof R- 23 Total 58551 Fenestration Schedule Code Descri tion Area U-factor SHGC SC Tvis G-1 User Defined-Window-Fixed-Aluminum with Thermal 4176 0.500 0.730 0.849 0.800 Break-Clear-Tenant_Glass(User Defined) Total 4176 Area Space Category:Bldg_500 Floor Area(ftZ):45336 Gross Wall Area(ftz): 17391 Window Area(ft2):4176 Window WaII Ratio:0.240 Gross Roof Area(ft2):45336 Skylight Area{ft2):0 Skylight Roof"Ratio: 0.000 Door Area (ft2):0 Surfaces Name T e Const.Code Area Orient Notes Roof Roof G2 45336 n/a n.a. North_Wall,_W Wall C-1 4148 North n.a. ith Gano ASHRAE/IESNA Standard 90.1-2004 05/13/13 Envelope Compliance Test Results Building_500 North_Wal1,_W Wall C-1 2941 North n.a. ith_No_Canop Y North West Wall C-1 680 Northwest n.a. Wall West_Wall Wall C-1 1288 West n.a. South_Wail Wali C-1 6630 South n.a. East_Wall Wall C-1 1704 East n.a. Total g2727 O enin s Name T e Const.Code Area Orient. Notes Glass Window G-1 2079 North Overhang PF=0.35 North_Glass_w Window G-1 1251 North Overhang PF=0.44 ith Canopy North Glass_w Window G-1 198 North n.a. ithout_Canopy Glass Window G-1 216 Northwest Overhang PF= 1.11 West_Glass Window G-1 216 West Overhang PF=0.44 East_Giass Window G-1 216 East Overhang PF= 1.11 Total 4176 ASHRAE/IESNA Standard 90.1-2004 05/13/13 � ` • ' • � • ! • i � • � � Project Name: Paragon Outlets Building 500 Project Address:3985 Eagan Outiets Parkway Eagan,MN Date: 3/4/2013 City: Eagen Zip: 55122 HVAC System Designer of Record:Jeffrey M.Zunt Telephone: 330-659-6688 Contact Person:Jeffrey M.Zunt Telephone: 330-659-6688 Qualification O Exception:An energy recovery ❑ (j),Piping is insulated in accordance with ventilation system is provided in Table 6.8.3.Insulation ezposed to weather is o The buiiding is 2 stories'or less in height and accordance with the requirements in suitable for outtloor service.Cellular.foam has a gross floor area is less than 25,000 ft2. §6.5:6. insulation is protected from water and solar Requirements ❑ (f)The system shali be controlled by a radiation. manual changeover or dual setpoint O Exception:Piping is located within o (a}All systems serve a single HVAC zone. thermostat. manufactured HVAC units. ❑ (b)Cooling(if any)is provided by a unitary O (g)Heat,pumps equipped with auxiliary O (k)Ductwork and plenums are insulated in packaged or split-system air conditioner that internal electric resistance heaters(if any) accordance with Tables 6.8.2A and 6.8.2B is either air-cooled or evaporatively cooled have controls to prevent supplemental heater and sealed in accordance with Tables and meets the efficiency requirements shown operation when the heating load can be met 6.4.4.2A and 6:4.4.26. in Table 6.8.1.List equipment in the table by the heat pump alone. below. ❑ (I)Construction documents require air O (h)The system controls do not permit reheat systerrrs to be balanced in accordance with o (c)The system has an air economizer as or any other form ofsimultaneous heating industry-accepted procedures to within 10% required by Table 6.5.1,with controls as and cooling#o�humidity control. of design airflow rates. required in Tables 6.5.1.1.3A and 6;5.1.1.36. The economizer has either barometric or O (i)Systems are provided with a time switch ❑ (m)Where separate heating and cooling powered relief sized to prevent that(1)can start and stop the system under equipmenf serve the same temperature zone, overpressurization of the building.Outdoor air different schedules for seven diffe�ent day- thermostats are interlocked to prevent dampers for the economizer use are provided types per week;(2)is capable of retaining simultaneous heating and cooling: with blade and jamb seals. programming and time setting during a loss of powerfor a period of at least 10,h;(3) o (n)Exhausts are equipped with graviry or ❑ Exception:The cooling efficiency meets includes an accessible manual override that motarized dampers that will automatically or exceeds the efficiency requirement in allows temporary operation of the system for shut when systems are not in use. Table 6.3.2.Document in table below. up to 2 h;(4)is capable of temperatu�e setback down to 55°F du�ng off hours;and � Exception:Design capacity is less than ❑ (d)Heating(if any)shall be provided by a (5)is capable of temperature setup to 90°F 300 cfm. unitary packaged or split-system heat pump, during off hours. O Exception:System operates a fuel-fired fumace,an electric resistance heater or a baseboard system connected to a ❑ Exception:System serves hotel/motel continuously. boiler.All heating equipment meets the guest rooms. O (o)Systems have optimum start controls. efficiency requirements of the Standard.List ❑ Exception:System operates equipment in table below. continuously. O Exception:Supply air capacity is less than 10,000 cfm. ❑ (e)The outdoor air quantity is less than or ❑ Exception: System has both a cooling equal to 3,000 cfm and less than or 70%of or heating capacity less than 15,000 the supply air quantity at minimum outdoor air Btu/h and a supply fan motor power design conditions. greater than 3/4 hp. ' Equi ment Efficienc System Mfg.& Equipment Heating Cooling Tag(s) Model Type No. Rated Rated Minimum Rated Rated Minimum Econ. Capacity Efficiency Efficiency Capacity Efficiency Efficiency Min. Efficiency q�p 0 ANSI/ASHRAE/IESNA Standard 90.1-2004 � a E � � . ` • . • � ! � ' • , � - Project Name:Paragon Outlets Building 500 Project Address: 3985 Eagan Outlets Parkway Eagan,MN Date: 3/4/2013 HVAC System Designer of Record; Jeffrey M,Zunt Telephone; 330-659-6688 Contact Person: Jeffrey M.Zunt Telephone: 330-659-6688 Ciry: Eagen Climate Zone: 6A Zip:55122 1%Summer DB Temp: 91 F 1%Summer WB Temp: 73 F 99.6%Winter Temp: -16 F Mandato E uipment E�cienc Worksheet 6.4.1.1 System Tag Equipment Type(Tables Size Category(Tables Sub-Category or Rating Units of E�ciency Minimum Efficiency(Tables 6.8.1A through G) 6.8.1A through G) Condition(Tables 6.8.1A (Tables 6.8.1A 6.8.1A thraugh G) through G) through G) Rated >_ Required 1.5 Ton Air Cond.Air Cooled <65,000 BTU Single Package SEER 13.0 >_ 12.0 2 Ton Air Cond.Air Cooled <65,000 BTU Single Package SEER 13.0 >_ 12A 3 Ton Air Cond.Air Cooled <65,000 BTU Single Package SEER 15.0 z 12.0 5 Ton Air Cond.Air Cooled >65,000 <135,000 Single Package SEER 15.0 >_ 12.0 6 Ton Air Cond.Air Cooled >65,000 <135,000 Single Package EER 12:6 >_ 10.3 7.5 Ton Air Cond.Air Cooled >65,000 <135,000 Single Package EER 13.0 >_ 10.3 > Mandato Non-Standard Centrifu al Chiller Worksheet 6.4.1.1 System Tag Leaving CHW Entering CW Condenser Flow Rate Size Category Minimum Efficiency(Tables Temperature(°F) Tempe�ature(°F) (gpm/ton) (Tables 6.8.1H 6.8.1H through J) through J) Rated >_ Required > > > > General Mandatory Requiremen#s � Piping insulation meets or exceeds the Special Mandatory Requirements requirements of the Standard(§6.4.4.1.3). o Load calcuiations are provided for selection o Freeze protection or snow/ice melting of aIl equipment and systems(§6.4.2). � Construction documents require record systems(if any),have cont�ols to prevent ❑ Stair vents,elevator shaftvents,gravity drawings(§'6.7.2.1),manuals(§6.7.2.2), operation in warm weather(§6.4.3.7). system balancing(§6.7.2.3)and system hoods,gravity vents and gravity ventilations o tndependent perimeter heating systems(if are provided with motorized darnpers. �mmissioning(§6.7.2.4). any)comply with the control requirements of ❑ Exception:Gravity dampers are used §6.4.3.1'1 and§6.4.3.2. since the building is less than 3 stories ❑ Independent heating and cooling thermostatic or in climate zones 1-3. controls(if any)are interlocked to prevent ❑ Exception:No vents are required as crossover of set points(§6.4.3.2). these systems ventilate unconditioned zones. � ��p d � � ANSI/ASHRAE/IESNA Standard 90.1-2004 E � � . ' • . ' • • ' •' . ` • . . .:• - Project Name:Paragon Outlets Building 500 Contact Person:Jeffrey M.Zunt Telephone: 330-659-6688 S stems Worksheet . 6.4 System Tag 1.5 Ton 2 Ton 3 Ton 5 Ton 6 Ton 7.5 Ton Suppry CFM 600 800 1200 2000 2400 3000 Supply ESP(in.w.c.) �� , �,� �� „ Fan System HP 1/8 1/4 1A 1A 1.0 3.75 OA CFM(i.e.Outdoor Air CFM) 50 60 240 400 480 600 Automatic Shutdown(§6.4.3.2.1) C1 C1 C1 C1 C1 C1 beadband(§6.4.3.1.2) N2 N/A N2 N/A N2 N/A N2 N!A N2 N/A N2 N/A Setback Controls(§6.4.3.2.2) C1 C1 C1 C1 C1 C9 Setup Controls(§6.4.3.2.2) C1 C1 C1 C1 C1 C1 Optimum Start(§6.4.3.1.3) N3 N/A N3 N/A N3 N/A N3 N/A N3 N/A N3 N/A Zone Isolation(§6.4.3.1.4) N3 N/A N3 N/A N3 N/A N3 N/A N3 N/A N3 N/A Shutoff Dampers(§6.4.3.3.3) C2 C2 G2 G2 C2 C2 Hsat Pump Aux Heat(§6.4.3,4) N1 N/A N1 N/A N1 N/A N1 N/A N1 N/A N1 N/A Humidifier Preheat(§6.4.3.5) N1 N/A N1 N/A N1 N/A N1 N/A N1 N/A N1 N/A Humidification/Dehumidification Deadband(§6.4.3.6) N1 N/A N1 N/A N1 N/A N1 N/A N1 N/A N1 N/A Ventilation Controf(§6.4.3.8) N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N!A DucUPienum Insulation(§8.4.4.2:1) C1 C1 C1 C1 C1 C1 Duct Sealing Levels(§6.4.42.1)Supply/Retum A A A A A A bucf Leakage Test(§6.4.4.2.2) Y Y Y Y Y Y In the table above,enter the appropriate codes Setup Controls Heat Pump Aux Heat from this list: . C1 Setup provided(up to 90F) • C1 Complying controts provided Shutdown • N9 N/A continuous operation • N1 N/A system is not a heat pump • N2 N/A_<15 kbtu/h or Q/4 hp • N2 N/A auxiliary is not electric or is not • C1 Complying nonresidential time switch N3 N/A i%Sum DB<=100F provided with override . N4 N/A no cooling • N3 N/A heat pump covered by NAECA • C2 Complying residential time switch with override Optimum Start Humidifier Preheat • N1 N/A continuous operation . C1 Optimum start provided • C1 Complying controls provided • N2 N/A s'15 kbtu/h or S3/4 hp . N1 N/A continuous operation • N1 N/A no humidifier • N3 N/A hotel/motel guestroom . N2 N/A_<15 kbtu/h or Ci/4 hp • N3 N/A su I <-10,000 cfm HumidificationlDehumidification Dead Band Dead Band Pp y • C1 Gomplying controls provided • C1 Dual setpoint control Shutoff Dampers • N1 N/A no humidification and/or • C2 Manual change over control . C1 Motorized shutoff dampers on OA and dehumidification • N9 N/A special occupancy(requires Exh DuctlPlenum Insulation approval) . G2 Gravity shutoff dampers on OA and Exh • N2 N/A heating or cooling only . N9 N/A continuous operation • C9 Complying insulation provided N2 N/A 515 kbtu/h or Q/4 h • N1 N/A alP ducts located in conditioned Setback Contrals ' p space • C1 Setback provided(down to 55F) • N3 N/,4 OA/EA<=300 cfm N1 N/A continuous o eration Duct Sealing ' P Zone Isolation . Enter highest seal level(A,8 or C)for • N2 N/A 515 kbtu/h or Q/4 hp . C1 Isolation zones provided • N3 N/A 99.6%Win DB>40F � supply and retum N1 N/A confinuous operation • N4 N/A radiant heating . N2 N/A_<15 kbtu/h or Q/4 hp Duct Leakage Test • N5 N/A no heating . N3 N/A all zones on same schedule • Y Ducts will be tested for leakage • N4 N/A OA/EA<=5,000 cfm • N Ducts will not be tested for leakage y�p 0 ANSI/ASHRAE/IESNA Standard 90.1-2004 � � E � r �� . � �� . � � �� . ,: . . • - Project Name: Paragon Outiets Building 500 Contact Person: Jeffrey M.Zunt Telephone: 330-659-6688 Prescriptive Checklist heat addition and loop heat rejection(if any) Prescriptive Economizers(§6.5.1) Specify economizer exemptions: �mply with the requirements of§6.5.2.2.3. � Systems employ airside economizers (§6.5.1.1). ❑ System pumps g�eater than 10 hp employ variable flow controls(§6.5.4.1),pump � Economizer provides up to 100°/a design isolation(§6.5.4.2)and temperature reset airflow in outdoor air(§6.5.1.1.1). Prescriptive Air-System Requirements (§6.5.4.3). � Economizer is integrated with the mechanical o Simultaneous Heating and Cooling Prescriptive Special System Requirements cooling system(§6.5.1.1.2 and§6.5.1.3}. (§6.5.2.3). ❑ All heat rejection equipment with motors?7.5 � Economizer high limit shutoff complies with � Zone minimums were set to meet the hp employ controls that compiy with§6.5.5. §6.5.1.1.3. requirements of Standard 62. o Exhaust Air Energy Recovery:all fan.systems � Economizer dampers meet or exceed ❑ Zone minimums were set to<_0.4 cfm/ftz of that have both a design supply capacity of>_ leakage requirements(§6.5.1.1.4). zone conditioned floor area. 5,000 cfm and a minimum outdoor air supply of>_70%of the design supply air employ an � System provides relief for up to 100%design � Zone minimums are less than 300 cfm. energy recovery system that complies with airflow in outdoor air(§6.5.1.1.5). ❑ Other(requires special documentation and §6.5.6.1. � Economizer complies with the heating system approval). ❑ Heat recovery for service water heating is impact requirements(§6.5.1.4). o Humidity controls(if any)comply with the provided for facilities that operate ❑ Systems employ waterside economizers. requirements of§6.5.2.3. continuously,have a total water-cooled heat rejection capacity exceeding 6,000,000 btu7h, ❑ Economizer can provide 100%of the load at o Systems that employ hydronic cooling and and have a design seivice water heating load eithe�the outdoor conditions of 50°Fdbl45°F have humidification(if any)use a waterside exceeding 1,000,000 btu/h.The heat wb o�45°F db/40°F wb where required for economizer that complies with§6.5.1. recovery system(if any)complies with dehumidification purposes(§6.5.1.2.1). §6.5.6:2. o Variable air volume fan controls comply with ❑ Precooling coils and heat exchangers have the requirements of§6.5.3.2. o Kitchen hoods with exhaust flows>5000 cfm either a<_15 ft of WC pressure drop or are comply with the requirements of§6.5.7.1. Prescriptive Water-System Requirements bypassed when economizer is not in use(§ O Fume hoods with a total exhaust system flow 6.5.1`2.2). O Three-pipe systems are not used(§ >�5,000 cfm comply with the requirements of 6.5.2.2.1). 0 Economizer is integrated with the mechanical §6.5.7.2. cooling system(§6.5.1.3). o Two-pipe changeover heating/cooling o Radiant heaters complying with§6.5.8.1 are m Economizer complies with the heating system systems(if any)comply with the used to heat unenclosed spaces(if any). impact requirements(§6.5.1.4). requirements of§6.5.2.2.2. o Hydronic(ground-or water-loop)heat pump � The cooling equipment with hot-gas bypass ❑ Systems are exempt from the economizer systems that have equipment for both loop controls(if any)meets the unloading requirements. requirements of§6.5.9. �o ~ 0 ANSI/ASHRAE/IESNA Standard 90.1-2004 � �� r . � � � . � � . .. ,, �: Pro�ect Name: Paragon Outlets Building 500 ContactPerson: Jeffrey M. Zunt Telephone: 330-659-6688 Complete one worksheet for each fan system >5hp Prescriptive Fan Power Limitations 6.5.31 Supply Fan Retum Fan Exhaust Fan Series-Style Fan-Powered Total System Box' Motor(hp) Tag Supply CFM Motor(hp) Tag Motor(hp) Tag Motor(hp) Tag Motor(hp) F-Total Supply CFM Total System Motor HP� Table 6. . e hp/cfm Total Supply CFM X cfm Constant + 1,000 HP Allowance = hp(=Value X CFM/1000) 2 Credits and/or adjustments*-� Adjusted HP Allowance"` hp(see§6.5:3.1) z 'Attach calculations and documentation if credits or temperature adjustments are used.Refer to§6.5.3.1 for the formulas Credits and adjustments are available for the following: • Clean frlter pressure drops in excess of 1 in.w.c.; • Pressure drop due to heat recovery coils or devices or evaporative cooling equipment or devices; • Relief fans that operate during peak cooling due to high ventilafion rates;and • Room to cooling air supply temperature differences that are greater than 20°F(e.g.low temperature supply). ��p 0 ANSI/ASHRAE/IESNA Standard 90.1-2004 � � � � Y � . �, . � � � , . � ;, � Project Name: Paragon Outlets Building 500 Project Address:3985 Eagan Outlets Parkway Eagan,MN Date: 3/4/2013 City: Eagen Zip: 55122 HVAC System Designer of Record:Jeffrey M.Zunt Telephone:330-659-6688 Contact Person: Jeffrey M.Zu'nt Telephone: 330-659-6688 Qualification o Exception:An ene�gy recovery ❑ Q)Piping is insulated in accordance with ventilation system is provided in Table 6.8.3.Insulation exposed to weather is o The building is 2 stories or less in height and accordance with the requirements in suitable for outdoor service.Cellular foam has a gross floor area is less than 25,000 ftz. §6.5.6. insulation is protected from water and solar radiation. Requirements ❑ (f)The system shall be controlled by a manual changeover or dual setpoint O Exception:Piping is located within � (a)All systems serve a single HVAC zone. thermostat. manufactured HVAC units. o (b)Cooling(if any)is provided by a unitary O (g)Heat pumps equipped with auxiliary ❑ (k)Ductwork and plenums are insulated in packaged or split-system air conditioner that intemal electric resistance heaters(if any) accordance with Tables 6.8.2A and 6.8.2B is either air-cooled or evaporatively cooled have controls to prevent supplemental heater and sealed in accordance with Tables and meets the efficiency requirements shown operation when the heating load can be met 6.4.4.2A and 6.4.4.28. in Table 6.8.1.List equipment in the table by the heat pump alone. below. o (I)Construction documents require air ❑ (h)The system controls do not permit reheat systems to be balanced in accordance with o (c)The system has an air economizer as or any other form of simultaneous heating industry-accepted procedures to within 10% required by Table 6.5.1,with controls as and cooling for humidity controL of design airFlow rates. requi�ed in Tables 6.5.1.1.3A and 6.5.1.1.3B. The economizer has either barometric or ❑ (i)Systems are provided with a time switch o (m)'Where separate heating and cooling powered relief sized to prevent that(1)can start and stop the system under equipment serve the same temperatu�e zone, overpressurization of the building.Outdoor air different schedules for seven different day- thermostats are interlocked to prevent dampers for the economizer use are provided types per week;(2)is capable of retaining simultaneous heating and cooling. with blade and jamb seals. programming and time setting during a loss of power for a period of at least 10 h;(3) o (n)Exhausts are equipped with gravity or ❑ Exception:The cooling e�ciency meets includes an accessible manual override that motorized dampers that will automatically or exceeds the efficiency requirement in allows temporary operation of the system for shut when systems are not in use. Table 6.3:2.Document in table below. up to 2 h;(4)is capable of temperature setback down to 55°F during offhours;and � Exception:Design capacity is less than ❑ (d)Heating(if any)shall be provided by a (5)is capable of temperature setup to 90°F 300 cfm. unitary packaged or split-system heat pump, during off hours. ❑ Exception:System operates a fuel-fired furnace,an electric resistance continuously. heater or a baseboard system connected to a o Exception;System serves hotel/motel boiler.AI(heating equipment meets the guest rooms. O (o)Systems have optimum start controls. efficiency requirements of the Standard.List ❑ Exception:System operates equipment in table below. continuously. 0 Exception:Supply air capacity is less than 10,000 cfm. o (e)The outdoor air quantity is less than or ❑ Excepfion: System hasboth a cooling equal to 3,000 cfm and less than or 70%`of or heating capacity less than 15,000 the supply air quantity at minimum outdoor air Btu/h and a supply fan motor power design conditions. g�eater than 3/4 hp. E uipment Efficienc System Mfg.& Equipment Heafing Cooling Tag(s) Model Type No. Rated Rated Minimum Rated Rated Minimum Econ. Capacity Efficiency Effibiency Capacity Efficiency Efficiency Min. Efficiency ' H p �,� 0 ANSI/ASHRAE/IESNA Standard 90.1-2004 � _E m � . °.. • . • � � ; � . . � � . : Project Name;Paragon Outlets Building 500 Project Address: 3985 Eagan Outlets Parkway Eagan,MN Date: 3/4/2013 HVAC System Designer of Record: Jeffrey M.Zunt Telephone: 330-659-6688 Contact Person: Jeffrey M.Zunt Telephone: 330-659-6688 City: Eagen Climate Zone: 6A Zip:55122 1%Sumrner DB Temp: 91 F 1%Summer WB Temp: 73 F 99.6%Winter Ternp: -16 F Mandato Equipment Efficienc Worksheet 6.4.1.1 System Tag Equipment Type(Tables Size Category(Tables Sub-Category or Rating Units of E�ciency Minimum Efficiency(Tables 6.8.1A through G) 6.8.1A through G) Condition(Tables 6.8.1A (Tables 6.8.1A 6.8.1A through G) through G) through G) Rated >_ Required 8.5 Ton Air Cond.Air Cooled >65,000 <135,000 Single Package EER 13.0 >_ 10.3 10 Ton Air Cond.Air Gooled >65,000 <135,000 Single Package EER 12.5 >_ 10.3 15 Ton Air Cond.Air Cooled >135,000 <180,000 Single Package EER 12.0 >_ 9.7 > > > > Mandato Non-Standard Gentrifu al Chiiler Worksheet 6,4.1.1 System Tag Leaving CHW Entering CW Condenser Flow Rate Size Category Minimum Efficiency(Tables Tempe�ature(°F) Temperature(°F) (gpm/ton) (Tables 6.8.1H 6.8.1H through J) through J) Rated >_ Required > > > > General Mandatory Requirements � Piping insulation meets or exceeds the Special Mandatory Requirements requirements of the Standard(§6.4.4.1.3). ❑ Load calculations are provided for selection o Freeze protection or snow/ice melting of all equipment and systems(§6.4_2). m Construction documents require record systems(if any)have controls to prevent ❑ Stair vents,elevator shaft vents,gravity drawings(§6.7.2.1),manuals(§6.7.2.2), operation in warm weather(§6.4:3T}. system balancing(§6.7.2.3)and system hoods,gravity vents and gravity ventilations �mmissioning`(§67.2.4). O Independent perimete�heating systems(if are provided with motorized darnpers. any)compiy with the control requirements of o Facception:Gravity dampers are used §6.4.3.1.1 and§6.4.3.2. since the building is less than 3 stories ❑ Independent heating and cooling thermostatic or in climate zones 1-3. controls(if any)are interlocked to prevenf o Exception:No vents are required as crossover of set points(§6.4.3.2). these systems ventilate unconditioned zones. ��9 0 ANSI/ASHRAE/IESNA Standard 90.1-2004 � � E � � •r � i i � � � ' ". �'- Project Name: Paragon Outlets Building 500 Contact Person;Jeffrey M.Zunt Telephone: 330-659-6688 S stems Worksheet 6.4 System Tag 8.5 Ton 10 Ton 15 Ton Supply CFM 3800 4000 6000 Supply ESP(in.w.c.) �^ �^ �� Fan System HP 3.75 3.75 3.0 OA CFM{i.e.Outdoor Air CFM) 760 800 1200 Automatic Shutdown(§6.4.3.2.1) C1 C1 C1 Deadband(§6.4.3.1.2) N2 N/A N2 N/A N2 N/A Setback Controls(§6.4.3.2.2} C1 C1 C1 Setup Controls(§6.4.3.2.2) C1 C1 C1 Optimum Start(§6.4.3.1.3) N3 N/A N3 N/A N3 N/A Zone Isolation(§6.4.3.1.4) N3 N/A N3 N/A N3 N/A Shutoff Darnpers(§6.4.3.3.3) C2 C2 C2 Heat Pump Aux Heat{§6.4.3.4) N1 N/A N1 N/A N1 N/A HumidifierPreheat(§'6.4.3.5) N1 N/A N1 N/A N1 N/A Humidification/Dehumidification Deadband(§6.4.3.6) N1 N/A N1 N/A N1 N/A Ventilation Control(§6.4.3.8) N/A N/A N/A Duct/Pienum Insulation(§6.4.4.2.1) C1 C1 C1 Duct Sealing Levels(§6.4.4.2:1)SupplylRetum A A A A A A Duct Leakage Test(§6.4.4.2'.2) Y Y Y Y Y Y In the table above,enter the appropriate codes Setup Controls Heat Pump Aux Heat from this tist: . G1 Setup provided(up to 90F) • C1 Complying controls provided Shutdown • N1 N/A continuous operation . N1 N/A system is not a heat pump C1 Complying nonresidential time switch ' N2 N/A 515 kbtu/h or<3/4 hp . N2 N/A auxiliary is not electric or is not • with override • N3 N/A 1%Sum DB<=100F provided . C2 Complying residential time switch with • N4 N/A no cooling • N3 N/A heat pump covered by NAECA override Optimum Start Humidifier Preheat • N1 N/LI continuous operation . Ci Optimum start provided • C1 Complying controls provided • N2 N/A S15 kbtu/h or Q/4 hp . N1 N/A continuous operation • N1 N/A no humidifier • N3 N/A hotel/motel guestroom . N2 N/A_<15 kbtu/h or Gi/4 hp N3 N/A su I <-10,000 cfm Humidification/Dehumidification Dead Band Dead Band � pP y . C1 Complying contro/s provided • C1 Dual setpoint control Shutoff Dampers • N1 N/A no humidification and/or • C2 Manual change over control . C1 Motorized shutoff dampers on OA and dehumidifrcation • N1 N/A special occupancy(requires Exh approval) . C2 Gravity shutoff dampers on OA and Exh Duct/Plenum Insulation • N2 N/A heating orcooling only . N1 N/A continuous operation • C1 Complying insulation provided N2 N/A_<15 kbtu/h or 4i/4 h • N1 N/A all ducts located in conditioned Setback Controls ' p space • C1 Setback provided(down to 55F) • N3 N/A OA/EA<=300 cfm ' p Zone Isolation Duct Sealin Ni N/A continuous o eration 9 • N2 N/A s'15 kbtu/h or Gi/4 h • Enter highest sea/level(A,8 or C)for p • C1/solation zones provided • N3 N/A 99.6%Win DB>40F suppiy and return + N7 N/A continuous operation • N4 N/A radiant heating . N2 N/A_<15 kbtu/h or Q/4 hp Duct Leakage Test • N5 N/A no heating . N3 N/A al!zones on same schedule • Y Ducts will be fested for leakage • N4 N/A OA/EA<=5,000 cfm • N Ducts wiN not be tested for leakage y ~ 4 0 ANSI/ASHRAE/IESNA Standard 90.1-2004 � �� • -� � . � _ � � , .. . . � . � . . . . ... Project Name: Paragon Outlets Building 500 Contact Person: Jeffrey M.Zunt Telephone: 330-659-6688 Prescriptive Checklist heat addition and loop heat rejection(if any} Prescriptive Economizers(§6.5.1) Specify economizer exemptions: comply with the requirement5of§6.5.2.2.3. m Systems employ airside economizers o System pumps greater than 10 hp employ (§6.5.1.1). variable flow controls(§6.5.4.1),pump � Economizer provides'up to 100%design isolation{§6.5.4.2)and temperature reSet airflow in outdoor air(§6.5.1.1.1). Prescriptive AirSystem Requirements (§6.5.4.3). � Economizer is integrated with the mechanical O Simultaneous Heating and Cooling Prescriptive8pecial System Requirements cooling system(§6.5.1.1.2 and§6.5.1.3). (§6.5.2.3). o All heat rejection equipment with motors?7.5 � Economizer high limit shutoff complies with � Zone minimums were set to meet the hp employ controls that comply with§6.5.5. §6.5.1.1.3. requirements of Standard 62. o Exhaust Air Energy Recovery:all fan systems � Economizer dampers meet or exceed � Zone minimums were set to 50.4 cfm/ftz of that have both a design supply capacity of>_ leakage requirements(§6.5.1.1.4). zone conditioned floor area. 5,000 cfm and a minimum outdoor air suppiy of>_70%of the design supply air employ an � System provides relief for up to 100%design � Zone minimums are less than 300 cfm. energy recovery system that complies with airFlow in outdoor air{§6.5.1.1.5). ❑ Other(requires special documentation and §6.5.6.1. m Economizer complies with the heating system approval}. ❑ Heat recovery for service water heating is impact requirements(§6.5.1.4). ❑ Humidity controls(if any)comply with the provitled for facilities that operate ❑ Systems employ waterside economizers. requi�ements of§6.5.2.3. continuously,have a total water-cooled heat rejection capacity exceeding 6,000,000 btu/h, ❑ Economizer can provide 100%of the load at o Systems that employ hydronic cooling and and have a design service water heating load either the outdoor conditions of 50°F db/45°F have hurnidification(if any)use a waterside exceeding 1,000,OOO,btu/h.The heat wb or 45°F db/40°F wb where re uired for economizer thaf complies with 6.5.1. q § recovery system(if any)complies with dehumidification purposes(§6.5.1.2.1). ❑ Variable air volume fan controls comply with §6.5.62. ❑ Precooling coils and heat exchangers have the requirements of§6.5.3.2. ❑ Kitchen hoods with exhaust flows>5000 cfm either a_<15 ft of WC pressure drop or are comply with the requirements of§6.5.7.1. Prescriptive Water-System Requirements bypassed when economizer is not in use(§ o Fume hoods with a total exhaust system flow 6.5.1.2.2). o Three-pipe systems are not used(§ >15,000 cfm comply with the requirements of m Economizer is integrated with the mechanical 6.5.2.2.1). §6.5.7.2, cooling system(§6.5.1.3). ❑ Two-pipe changeover heatinglcooling o Radiant heaters compiying with§6.5.8.1 are systems(if any)comply with the m Economizer complies with the heating system requirements of§8.52.2.2. used to heat unenclosed spaces(if any). impact requirements(§6.5.1.4}. ❑ Hydronic(ground-or water-loop)heat pump � The cooling equipment with hot-gas bypass o Systems are exempt from the economizer systems that have equipment for both loop �ntrols(if any)meets the unloading requirements. requirements of§6.5.9. 9�p 0 ANSI/ASHRAE/IESNA Standard 90.1-2004 � � E � � �� - � � � . . � � _ Project tvame: Paragon Outlets Building 500 Contact Person: Jeffrey M.Zunt Telephone: 330-659-6688 Complete one worksheet for each fan system > 5hp Prescriptive Fan Power Limitations 6.5.3.1 Supply Fan Retum Fan Exhaust Fan Series-Style Fan-Powered Total System Box Motor(hp) Tag Supply CFM Motor{hp) Tag Motor(hp) Tag Motor(hp) Tag Motor(hp) E-Total Supply CFM Total System Motor HP� Table 6. . . e hp/cfm Total Supply CFM X cfm Constant + 1,000 � HP Ailowance = hp(=Value X CFM/1000) z Credits andlor adjustments"'� Adjusted HP Allowance' hp(see§6.5.3.1) >_ "Attach calculations and documentation if credits or temperature adjustments are used.Refer to§6.5.3.1 for the formulas Credits and adjustments are available for the following: • Clean filter pressure drops in excess of 9 in.w.c.; • Pressure drop due to heat recovery coils or devices or evaporative cooling equipment or devices • Relief fans that operate during peak cooling due to high ventilation rates;and • Room to cooling air supply temperature differences that are greater than 20°F(e.g.low temperature supply). d��P 0 ANSI/ASHRAE/IESNA Standard 90.1-2004 � d E � . • BUILDING 500 :s • � • . - � � r ' . � ~, � . . - � Pro�ect Name: PARAGON OUTLETS AT CEDAR`GROVE ' Project Address: TB� Date: 3:4.2d�3 oesignerotRecord: JEFFREY MITERKO -re�ephone:330,659.6688 Contact Person:GREG SUTYAK Telephone: 330.:659.6688 c�cy: EAGAN, MINNESOTA Mandatory Provisions Checklist Automatic lighting shutoff controls are provided m Each;space enclosed by ceiling-height ❑ Two-lamp tandem-wired ballasts. based on either a scheduling device or an partitions has an indepentlent,accessible occupant sensoc control that operates general lighting in the � Display lighting has a separate control. ❑ Exception: Space is intended for 24- space. ❑ Case lighting has a separate controL hour operation. ❑ Exception: The control is locafed in a � Hotel/motel gaest rooms have a master ❑ ft2 ception: Space is smaller than 5,000 re sonsocation for safety or security switch at the main entry. ❑ Exception: Space for patient care. ❑ For spaces less than or equal to 10,000 ft2,a � Task lighfing has a separate control. separate space control is provided for each ❑ Nonvisuai lighting has a sepa�ate controL 2,500 ft2 of area. ❑ Exception: Space where automatic 2 ❑ Demonstratian lighting has a separate lighting shutoff would endanger safety or � For spaces more than 10,000 ft,a separate controL space control is provided for each 10,000 ftZ security. of area: m Exit signs do not exceed 5 W per face. ❑ Either a photosensor or an astronomical time ❑ Exterior building grounds luminaires greater switch controls exterior lighting applications. than 100 W have lamps with minimum ❑ Exception: Lights must remain on for efficacy of 60 IumensiW. safety,security or eye adaptation 0 'Exception: Luminaire is activated with a reasons:` motion sensor. Interior Li htin Power Allowance Buiidin Area Method Builtling Lighting Power Density Building Area Lighting Power Allowance TYpe (W/ft2) (ftz) (W) Total Interior:Li htin Power Allowance S ,ace-b -Space Method Building CommoNSpecific Lighting Power Density Space Area Lighting Power Aliowance TYPe Space Type {W/ft') (ft2) (W) . . . . . � . . � CORRIDOR� � �� 0.5 � . . . . . �� 753 � � � � . .. 376:5 � � . . . . ELECT/MEGH 1S 501 751:5 Total 1128A h�~q4 0 ANSI/ASHRAE/IESNA Standard 90.1-2004 � �� . • � � � �. � . . : � .: ` " � � � ` � - . . �- , Pro�ect Name: PARAGON OUTLETS AT CEDAR GROVE contact Person: GREG SUTYAK Te�ephone: 330.659.668$ interior Connected Li htin Power TYPe „ �, ID Luminaire Description � �� Numberof Watts/ Total (induding number of lamps pe�fixture,watts per lamp,type of �� m �� Luminaires Luminaire Watts baliast,type of fixture) �� - �s �� m � � �,�;a� � m s�� o �a � � � �� ut� � ��d`� c z��:- � �,-�c� u_ 2,� � �`=r� O �� ' � AA � HIGH ABUSE,2-32W T8,ELEETRONIC� � � ��`�;�(� {��Q '(��-�� Q� � 10 60 � � 600 s �,�:. s-�,.,�; �' BB 4'INDUSTRIAL,2-32W T8,ELECTRONIC ��(� �_'�'„:a �; Q 8 60 480 �.�,. ��e� 0�;�0 ��0 �„�,��0 l�0 ��0 ��Q 0=:�0 =0��0 ��,0 ��0 �<�0 `� p' O��Q �O�O �::� O Q��O ��0 ��0 ��0 ��0 �� ;�p �. 0�0 ��0 ��0 Total 1080 Additional Interior Li htin Power Allowance _ Type Space ID Space Name �' ' Area(ftz) Unit Allowance Allowance Luminaire Installed ��'` (W/ftz) (W) ID's Rower(W} ��.� " � > �a'3= �� w �.c�� t`� `�a�: �-�*' p ��rn �� n� ��0 �� 0 ��, �0 �`�° '� � �:��; ��0 ��" �� 0 �� k±�0 ��`�_ 0�,0 �� , _ _„ ��0 �� h�p 0 ANSI/ASHRAE/IESNA Standard 90.1-2004 � E �,�`, . ' � � ._. � .. � �� I . � >, � . •�: , ' � ' ' ,,_ v . , �_ �..'�.':^ Project Name: PARAGON OUTLETS AT CEDAR GROVE Contact Person: GRE�'7 SU�A{'� Telephone: 33�.6�J9.66�8 Additional tnterior Connected Li htin Power TYPe p �, � �� Number of Watts/ Total tD Luminaire Descri tion (includingnumber of lamps per fixture,watts per lamp,type '�, '� �� m �m� Luminaires Luminaire Watts of ballast,type of fi�u�e) = � �� 1=� � a� �� c �- '�: rn rn� i�� a� �� o m s: . ,N y .��x p Q,�: .'O� � � � -�r��&.. . �,�� O ��F : � �Y�ti � '� � ��'. C �-a-� L� . . . ,� � � ' J �� Q. - -.� �`:x»v,s� . � . � . '#� �' .�'� '«:� � . . r-,s'�O tr��a�..�O ��..��0.. a�0 ��0 ��d O 0 `��,0 ��O O��O ��0 �U�0 ��-��`'0 �,��0 ��0 Q�O �`�O ��p �O ��0 ��0 Q` O O.�'�'O ��0 �r.�� 0�O �-'�0 ��Q Total h�p ANSI/ASHRAE/IESNA Standard 90.1-2004 6 E m �' ._Lfi. � . . � � . . � . Special Structural Testing & Inspection Program Summary Schedule Project Name Paragon Outlets Cedar Grove Project# 12021 Location 3985 Eagan Outlets Parkway, Eagan, MN Permit# (1) (Bu,ilding 500) Technical 2) Description (3) Type of Specific Report Assigned Firm (6) Section Article Inspection (4) Frequency(5) 1704.3 Steel Constr. Mat'I Verification SI -S Periodic High Strength Boltin Si -S Periodic Welding SI -S Continuous 1704.4 Conc. Constr. Reinf. Steel SI -S Periodic Anchor Bolts SI -S Continuous Design IVlix SI -S Periodic Strength Test SI -S Continuous Rlacement SI -S Continuous Curing SI -S Periodic Formwork SI -S Periodic 1704.5 Masonry Constr. Inspection SI =S Periodic Prior to Grout SI -S Periodic Grout Placement SI -S Continuous Grout/Mo►tar Pris SI -S Continuous Constr. Doc./Submi al SI -S Periodic Compliance 1704.7 Soils Subgrade SI -S Periodic Excavations SI -S Periodic Controlled Fill SI -S Periodic Placement of Fill SI -S Continuous Subgrade Prep. SI -S Periodic Note:This schedule shall be filled out and included in a Special Structural Testing and Inspection Program. (If not otherwise specified, assumed program will be "Guidelines for Special Inspection &'Testing" as contained in the Sta,te Building Code and as modified by the State adopted IBC. *A complete specification-ready program can be downloaded directly by visiting CASE/MN at www.cecm.orq. 1. Permit number to be provide by the Building Official 2. Referenced to the specific technical scope section in the program 3. Use descriptions per IBC Chapter 17, as adopted by MN State Building Code. 4. Special Inspector-Technical (SIT);Special Inspector-Structural (SIS) 5. Weekly, monthly, per test/inspection, per floor, etc. 6. Name of firm contracted to perform services 1 , Acknowledgements (Each appropriate representative shall sign below) Owner Firm Paragon Outlets Eagan LLC. Date 26 j Contractor Firm Ryan Companies US, Inc. Date J��y—/� Architect Firm Dal Pos Architects, LLC. Date !� � SER Firm Thorson Baker&Associates Date �j�1�,3 SI-S Firm Braun Intertec, Jnc. Date ��.� � TA Firm Braun Intertec, Inc. Date `s�� F �1�,�w� Firm Linco Companies Date S �Z I ) If requested by Engineer/Architect of Record or Building Official, the individual names of all prospective Special Inspectors and the work they intend to observe shall be identified as an attachment. Le end SER=Structural Engineer of Record SI-T =Special Inspector-Technical TA=Testing Agency F= Fabricator SI-S =Special Inspector-Structural Accepted for the Building Division By Date BCSD-PR019 4/03 <�; ��; Special lnspector Final Report Date: To City or County of: Attention: Street Address: City: State: Zip Code: RE: Final Project Report Project Name: Address: To Whom it May Concern: This is to certify that I performed special inspections on the following portions of the work at the above address which required continuous inspection, and which I was employed to inspect: Based on my personal observation and written reports of this work, it is my judgment that the inspected work was performed, to the best of my knowledge, in accordance with #he approved plans, specifications, and the applicable workmanship provisions of the Uniform Building Code. Sincerely, ' Special Inspector's Signature Date Print full name ID Number cc: Client/Owner Architect/Engineer 1 ' . � �y� 'rvb�� { �`�� F '` �M�„�: { �� #�� w'"!��"3+ms2.�s. d � ��t �',�b# �Y . .4� }1 j 5�` `/ r g�� iA.�� 2 �� '�v�, .. y4:*�� '..;� •..�` � �� zj . � '} t` •�^ �Z `4''� �.�v; . , N � • ""e ��a,` , .. '' �� J t .�' , .,;� ' A s;�� d r 4 �'. �yy' r 4 1 iK �Y f ,� c/� � P - � S �. `P�'` ' .�#�Y� t�;k.��G . Y��t� � « � � � ��.: '�^- Z�i��A `q. y��<<.�E � S :�� ' �. . � :..�. N� �l�y`,. S� 8_ ��`p' � �* LL . . � "d� ,4�� ' ' +s;��Ci � } ��t�� ._+ ` �'� . � �/ � .4��. c�• i � y '� O �'r � .� � -✓ �� " � J// �� y4�$$A + � �• 11yy �� '� l ;�� w � , k�" . . % � � � .. � b.. { •/ 4 "S�I�.,. W� • €" `� r��}��'n ../ j �' '. F, �„"' 1 ° �-� �� • � �a�n M°'�'A4 �� x.�, . t' �� O '��+�� ib, , ,�"�`��l �. � „� •„"� :.� � �r , . � �n '�µ; .�*,. ' �s� � � y ;��, �� ,`��t �1'.. ` � � '�..� �� a {� 9��,. . � � Y `� f. .f � �Y..� �,`` // �•� m � � •� . � ' ,E� �� ,lr� � � O . � � e �..e / �. � ... - ' N Y s"�� ';� � r�c`..' .:+^ .. r^ s ; , ..1'�: ��r . . '•�c .� � M r ��'� � \`u�'\ O �, r � �� '�'w Y � . . � �.,� { a ��a -./"'" `� �, � � rz . :� r i . �:' �_ 4 i� � '� �' ��'� \2-. �. �✓� �`� a � .> . . ,�s� �i d e �N � y � %}` .; �. - : y �� i��i� � ' � � . �� X ��f \�'�1 �1\,\ �j•4 ¢=~ +.� � . ��; , y �- . �� `\� ':a � �S '�� G r �. 1'7" �� ,�y ` �`.� 4, 1 �(tt g .a �a". 'a- �� %�� :� �� . �7 . � ��k�� 1�",, �,., � i�� 4; 4 d �T .7,.� tt -`� ~�.,a+,_. , � .N' � � � \1�� 1 ` r' • �1 ��.' �t,.' 1� �� j e,�Y��!�\�'�`��'�� 4J . e :�T�;t� �.k�.� t�r.��. t .i� i a vi� '. �.m�w \0' `� . 4 - � �4 1 �14 ` � �r %�� '� . � .�� F �� r , . Yi �yj �l �� 1 .'P•+� 1 y�' R�,�r,\3 ✓` � Y 4 (p C �'i'./ , �� '' �d � ,�,t �: �; : �� _ ,. c n . y; w i i' �r�-• �.�.. `' ��`,``� 4, y��; � � �; � E o' ,. \ �'�� e 1 '� �� x`�l� ,�� ,�� / }� 1 '�4.�' � ��' � �i . kr � '*. �/� �� > �:J�—•:---��s"^� .. �� F �\�� .}.l< G� \ ': �� ,�wZ? , � �.� q `� �,2� ��c'%^ . C", G , :�� c , s- RL 4! �� ,�.\� � `�♦ '3�'/ Tr ;S=A�.3 � - � x� r� .� � �� ` �. �� v � ' Y � ;T' ��< :J" . . 1�`�� . �� €�'�� :. V D� �,,.�� q �O� �t �,� -c-' � �. '�� '�� , i�S'� �P � � � � c ,yit. � ' � ' '� M � .' • p,�� J� Y O R . �� .'i, ,� .. .. � � q . V" , U L �'��`�+ :� ` \ �` �, ' �✓4�� .�SF P� Z¢ - { y_C ry ." � t` �:: N <` `i ,�•a �,✓J�, '��V�\ •�,�y, r�, . � t,��r .'}`d"��'�`, ,t ;� O) �� '�.��'� O . °��% ,,t� �,., � ) "� ch �� 'r J� .* �y �� t 4+ti � . ,, � , � 4 7 * ' �� . ` \\ c• � `` �t{� P � .t +�s+ah��.�( >�� a , ��. `�', '�r '. � T3"��,r . '�t i � �'��tie� `. � � �, � , � ,._ ,o ��0�t �, `-�"�,�` '� .3�' .(� • � 4: ,�r; �, o�.� ,�..'i�. j"�`�„�'� � .�'� �j � t+ .. � �� .., p''�"#C � r',�� `., �b(�� .k`'9 �:: .�� "� ; �� .` �� ` {�"'a . ..i+.e \ � O� ,4'w� � '•�O�t � •e� +}�. , r V''� �� O if '� ��'�� R \� �� ' A`F`,, �� '�%� � � �.# y� .� . L7. �' . � f . � �`�'� � �,., t�`,�i1 ' `�� \t � `;� �£� + `�� ' ` '4 � M `t` ��i' `�A•��•�� .. , , ` �ric1`� '� � 67 � � �kE :� � ,r�,} � �4, ' t t +p�� +� vt� � .�U�� . . C cn � co �, �s'' �� ! �` � rn �� '> . �.�`� !' �'� .� �' � `� �,� `'ti'ti; � ��, ?'��,�'•,�` � / , t @��`ss � �'fr �e''�' �`,r*.r-„��'�```jJ EL` 3 tt . �.� �� P Y � F��;��i �� ,��. � � ttl � �° .r\ a r`. .\, , ,• ,,�' \ � �'�/,�h m � � `�� `� '� rr;3�� a v �'€, Q � '' p�j � (Z� �r �j' ��, � N . '� �. . � �,• 4;�.�c� 'y� �� A �� .� _ \ '� ��1 f`� i��'� f' � �`t ' � W� .. ' ` �:. �. ��ry j` �� k�� _ y �,. ' � V��'�� J'f'j��S��{J, �� p,,�� .Y�� . i I ti � �" V .`� i� � �� -�E , � d - � ` L �' . . .. \ ��J4� .� » � ��___� � � .: � .. �"'�_-� _____""' '� . . �. .,�_..,:_: w� t„+ � . %�� * �� , t��l ts'a��i..;��r t� '� . �� ' i a � , � � i .ro [_�:�-.K.. � � 3 � .;� 3�f- t!! :�a t�-c e � N � �4 . _ //� .�/.�+� � ,� � ... � � HC � V/ W , ; � �. s � _� .-. � � t � " � �� ' �� ,. .. . � .:.. � O .;, � � � :.r s ' � :�� ' � , ; -,�` � j� � � �� '�,��Y€ . ?` �� . A/ � '� „� ' ,z ,�:��z '� #, L � ^' �� ` � � '�a e � .a � . � ,- _ � � � < � � � � � , - , . _ . , � Ua �� "�� ,_ � �► Structurai Steei Special inspection Fina1 Report Cedar Grove Outlet Mall—Building 500 3905 Eagan Outlets Parkway Eagan, Minnesota Prepared for Paragon Outlets Eagan LLC Project BL-12-04579A July 31, 2014 Braun Intertec Corporation Braun Intertec Corporation Phone:952•995•2000 . iiooi Hampshire Ave S Fax: 952•995•2020 Minneapolis,MN 5543g Web: braunintertec.com July 31, 2014 Project BL-12-04579A Mr.Steven Trainer Paragon Outlets Eagan LLC 217 E Redwood Street, 21st Floor Baltimore, MD 21202 Re: Structural Steel Special Inspection Procedural and Finai Report Cedar Grove Outlet Mall—Building 500 3905 Eagan Outlets Parkway Eagan, Minnesota Dear Mr. Trainer: Please find attached to this procedural report the Structural Steel Special Inspection Final Report for the Cedar Grove Outlet Mall Building 500 Project and the supporting Special Inspection Daily Reports. Special Inspection and Testing Procedures The special inspection services were periodically provided by International Code Council (ICC) certified special inspectors in accordance with the requirements of the Minnesota State Building Code, Chapter 17 of the International Building Code (IBC) and the project plans and specifications. The purpose of special inspections is to provide a review of the contractor's work designated by the project structural engineer as needing special inspection under the guidelines of the IBC to determine compliance with the approved construction documents. The special inspector does not have the responsibility or authority to, nor is it the intent of special inspections to have them,judge or modify the construction documents. Only the structural engineer of record can do this. As the special inspections were completed, a Special Inspection Daily Report was prepared to summarize the results of our inspections and testing. A copy of this report was proviaed to the contractor's site representative for their review and records. As part of this report, items needing correction or discrepancies observed from the approved construction documents were noted. We also summarized the discrepancies documented in a Discrepancy Log. As needed, we also contacted the project structural engineer for additional clarification on specific issues related to the drawings or discrepancies observed. Plans and Specifications The plans and project documents available at the site were used for our inspections. From time to time, we received plan modifications from the structural engineer. When received,these were used to evaluate the work completed in the field. Visual Examination of the Field-Made Welds Visual examination of the fabrication shop welds was completed after the fabricated members were delivered to the site in accordance with American Welding Society(AWS) D1.1-2008, Figure 5.4 and Table 6.1 to document only the weld quality. AA/EOE Prouiding engineering and enuironmental solutions since 1957 � Paragon Outlets Eagan LLC Project BL-12-04579A July 31, 2014 Page 2 Tension-Control Bolted Connection Observativns Tension-control bolted connection observations were conducted to determine if the bolt holes were filled, if the correct bolts were used, if the nuts were fully engaged and if the splined end of the tension- contro! bolts had s�parated fr�r� t"e body of the bolt. Removal of the splined e��d is a direct indicator the bolt has been torqued to the minimum snap-off load. At connections where the splined ends were not, or could not be removed, the torque applied to the bolt by the contractor was determined using a hand-held torque wrench. In addition, each connection was observed for fit-up and to determine if the various plies were in contact with one another. Metal Deck Weld and Fastener Observations Metal deck weld observations were conducted in general accordance with AWS D1.3-2008, Section 6.0 requirements and the requirements of the project plans and specifications. Items reviewed included the quality, size and spacing of the welds. In addition,the location and the completeness of the side-lap fastener installation were observed and evaluated. Column Anchor Bolt Observations The column anchor bolts were observed to determine if they were in place, and if the nuts were installed, fully engaged and snug tight. The base plates were observed to determine if they were in fuil contact with the adjoining surface. If required by the construction documents, we also observed if the plate washers were installed. General In performing its services, Braun Intertec used that level of care and skill ordinarily exercised by reputable members of its profession currently practicing in the same locality. No warranty, express or implied, is made. Thank you for the opportunity to provide the special inspection and testing services for this project. After review of the attached Special Inspection Final Report, if you have any questions or require additional information, please call Dan Graham at 952.995.2524 or Marv Denne at 952.995.2510. Sincerely, BRAUN INTERTEC CORPORATiON �..� �,��h�.��,�'- C �/ ��G�G'�-C-�'. / a��----`� Daniel P. Graha`m ICC Certifi d Special Inspector-Structural Steel and Welding � ��'L ��=2�G�� C istopher R. Kehl, PE Principal-Senior Engineer �� i �� Paragon Outlets Eagan LLC Project BL-12-04579A July 31, 2014 Page 3 Attachment: Structural Steel Special Inspection Final Report c: Jeff Graham, PE; Thorson Baker&Associates, Inc. Mark Kronbeck; Alliant Engineering, Inc. James Miller; Dalpos Architects& Integrators Craig Novaczyk; Gity of Eagan Michael Thorson, PE;Thorson Baker&Associates, Inc. Brad McCarter, PE; Braun intertec ��.��..�..��.. �� .,, � ' Braun Intertec Corporation Yhone:952•995•2000 . iiooi Hampshire Ave S Fax: 952•995•2020 Minneapolis,MN 55438 Web: braunintertec.com Structural Steel Special inspection Final Report City of: Eagan Date: July 31, 2014 Attention: Mr. Steven Trainer Project: Cedar Grove Outlet Mall—Building 500 3905 Eagan Outlets Parkway Eagan, Minnesota Braun Intertec Project: BL-12-04579A In accordance with the Minnesota State Building Code, Section 1704 of the International Building Code and the agreed-upon scope of services,the required special inspections and testing have been provided for the following items: Bolting. The bolted connections detailed in the attached Special Inspection Daily Reports were observed in general accordance with the requirements of the plans and specifications.There are currently no outstanding or unresolved bolted connection-related issues. Structural Field Welding. The welded connections detailed in the attached Special Inspection Daily Reports were observed in general accordance with the requirements of the project plans and specifications. Discrepancies were noted and documented. These connections were found to be acceptable following the required corrections as recommended by the engineer. There are currently no outstanding or unresolved structural welding-related issues. Metal Deck Welding and Fasteners. The metal deck welding and side-lap fasteners detailed in the attached Special Inspection Daily Reports were observed in general accordance with the requirements of the project plans and specifications.There are currently no outstanding or unresolved decking- related issues. AA/EOE Prouiding engineering and environmental solutions since 1g,57 • Paragon Outiets Eagan LLC Project BL-12-04579A July 31, 2014 Page 2 Conclusion Based upon the inspections conducted, the testing performed and the attached reports, it is our professional judgment that,to the best of our knowledge,the inspected work was performed and completed ir accordance with the approved plans, specifications, engineer-provided m�difications and applicable workmanship provisions of the Minnesota State Building Code and the International Building Code. fnspecting Firm: Braun Intertec Corporation I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer��ky k�id under the laws of the State of Minnesota. t��„ ��:�F��;,��-,, � `w ..'µy«p.p .,,,��0p� N,,^ . //�<�/ ��„��+�g `k"�� t:::. / o�<i�a� 6ea.1,. �r`,;�„�✓�1"�'.,'C�i�.u� .,, � . � ' e°.+Y't5 e?.P�&:: Christapher R. Kehl, PE � �;yY �C�� `�� - ��,.$ �Lde7�ti o.:�aF ,:�� . . Principal-Senior Engineer 4,;,�b ,��,_ ` 4�J1�°p�^ fl License Number: 43459 ��,°a ��'��z�� July 31, 2014 ♦�„� ��'��~ �` � �F � Attachments: Special Inspection Daily Reports 1 through 7 Summary of Discrepancy Log ��"��$�:�.», ��: � �y �� Issue Date: 2U13/01I01 Rev Ido.: 0 � � <. i��._.�,�.-�.r _ � �� . - �a ` � Speciai Inspection Daily Report City of Eagan, MN. Page 1 of 1 Report No.: Structurai Steel#i Date of this Re{��rR: 11-27-13 Project Name: Building 500 Project No.: BL-12-04579A Project Address: 3905 Eagan Outlets Parkway Client: Paragon Outlets Eagan ' Client Project No.: Weather: Partly Cloudy PM Brad McCarter Temperature: 20 ° F Type of Inspection: Inspection Coverage: ❑ Continuous ❑ Masonry ❑ Rebar Placement ❑ Foundations ❑ Special Cases: � Periodic �Wefding &Bolting ❑ Concrete ❑ Fireproofing ❑ Piles 8�Piers ❑ Tendon Placement ❑ Soils Did the architect or engineer autharize changes to City-appraved plans? ❑Yes (Listed Below) ❑ No Description and location of work completed: _ _ _ __ _. . _ _ __ _ _ _ __ __ _ Visuai wefd observations were performed in accordance with AWS D1.1 criteria on the fo{lowing: 1) Bar joist fillet welds Roof Level Grid K-M.2 13-18.7 per Nucor Vulcraft details. No discrepancy noted 2) Anchor bolts at Foundation Level Grid K-M.2 13-18.7 plies in direct contact with full nut engagement present. 3) Truss girder fillet welds at Ro�f Level Grid K-M.2 13-18.7 per Nucor Vulcraft details. No discrepancy noted List tests performed: _ . VFSUaI • Are there any discrepancies noted from this day's observations? Yes ❑ No � • Are there any outstanding discrepancies on this praject? Yes ❑ No � o If yes, see attaehed Summary Sheet. ■ Report given to Contractor: Yes � No ❑ To the best of our knowledge, work inspected was done in accordance with the approved plans, spec�cations, and applicable workmanship provisions of the current IBC, except as noted above, Signed: Date: 11-27-13 Print Fu{I Name: Daniel P. Graham t.D. No.: 1054095 S1&S2 � �� , �; Issue Qste: 2013/0'1f01 Rev No.: 0 � � > .s� h� . . ,� ;'� � �a -� : �� . 7 � a a� �� j �� <� � ��; . - �� Special fnspection Daily Report City of Eagan, MN. Page 1 of 1 Report R�.: Structurai Steei#2 Date of 4his Report: i2-03-13 Project Name: Buiiding 500 Project No.: BL-12-d4579A Project Address: 3905 Eagan Outlets Parkway Ctient: Paragon Outlets Eagan Client Project No.: Weather: Partly Cloudy PM Brad McCarter Temperature: 35 ° F Type of Inspection: Inspection Coverage: ❑ Continuous ❑ Masonry ❑ Rebar P(acement ❑ Foundations ❑ Special Cases: � Periodic �Welding &Bolting ❑ Concrete ❑ Fireproofing i ❑ Piles&Piers ❑ Tendon Placement ❑ Soils Did the architect or engineer authorize changes to City-approved plans? ❑ Yes (Listed Below) ❑ No Description and location of work completed: . __ _ _ __ _ Visual weld observations were perFormed in accordance with AWS D1.1 and D1.3 criteria on the following: 1) Bar joist fillet welds Roof Level Grid K-M.2 11-13 per Nucor Vulcraft details. No discrepancy noted 2) Anchor bolts at Foundation Level Grid K-M.2 11-13 piies in direct contact with full nut engagement present. 3} Truss girder fillet welds at Roof Level Grid K-M.Z 11-13 per Nucor Vulcraft details. No discrepancy noted 4} Puddle welds af Roof Level Grid K-M.Z 13-18.7 per structural details. No discrepancy noted 5) Deck support angle/splice bar fillet welds at Roof Level Grid K-M.2 13-18.7. No discrepancy noted List tests performed: . __ _ . _ _ _ _ __ Visual ■ Are there any discrepancies noted from this day's observations? Yes ❑ No � ■ Are there any outstanding discrepancies on this project? Yes ❑ No � o Ifi yes,see attached Summary Sheet. ■ Report given to Contractor: Yes � No ❑ To the best of our knowledge, work inspected was done in accordance with the approved pians, specifications, and appficable warkmanship provisions of the current iBC, except as noted above. Q 3igned: � Date: 12-03-13 Print Ful( Name: Daniei P. Graham I.D. No.: 1054095 S1&S2 ��' Bssue Date: 2013/01/01 Rev No.: Q � �� : '� �� ;m��-� �_ �� • � . � �: � � :�� `�9 � �� Special Inspection Daily Report � City of Eagan, MN. Page 1 of 1 r'tepori ivo.: Struciurai Steei#3 Da4e of this �Feport: 12-1 u-i 3 Project Name: Building 500 Project No.: BL-12-04579A Project Address: 3905 Eagan Outlets Parkway Client: Paragon Outlets Eagan Client Project No.: Weather: Partly Cloudy PM Brad McCarter Temperature: 5 ° F Type of Inspection: Insoection Coverage: ❑ Continuous ❑ Masonry ❑ Rebar Placement ❑ Foundations ❑ Special Cases: � Periodic � Welding 8� Bolting ❑ Concrete ❑ Fireproofing � Piles 8� Piers ❑Tendon Placement ❑ Soils � Did the architect or engineer authorize changes to City-approved plans? ❑ Yes (Listed Befow) ❑ No Description and location of work completed: __ .._ _ . _ _ __ . __ _ _ _ __ __ . _._ _ Visual weld observations were performed in accordance with AWS D1.1 and D1.3 criteria on the following: 1) Bar joist fillet welds Roof Level Grid K-M2 4-11 per Nucor Vulcraft details. No discrepancy noted 2) Anchor bolts at Foundation Level Grid K-M.2 4-11 (at accessible locations) plies in direct contact with full nut engagement present. 3) Truss girder fillet welds at Roof Level Grid K-M.2 4-11 per Nucor Vulcraft details. No discrepancy noted 4} Side lap fasteners on roof deck at Roof Level Grid K-M.2 13-18.7 per structura! details. No discrepancy noted List tests performed: _ _ _. __ __ _-. _ ___ _ Visual ■ Are there any discrepancies noted from this day's observations? Yes ❑ No � ■ Are there any outstanding discrepancies on this project? Yes ❑ No � o Ifi yes, see attached Summary Sheet. ■ Report given to Contractor; Yes � No ❑ To the best of our knawledge, work inspected was done in accordance with the approved plans, specifications, and applicable workmanship provisions of the current IBC, except as noted above. �igned: "'�'V Date: 12-10-13 Print Full Name: Daniel P. Graham I.D. No.: 1054095 S1&S2 ��LTES� �f3R INFORIVIATI010T �Y� 0 N,��,�,�.�wn�,�a, Project: Paragon Outlet Mall RFI#: 0283 Project No: 003334000-LIVE Date: 13-Dec-2013 To: Thorson Baker&Associates Attn: Jeff Graham Subject: Building 500 short joist tail Please review the following matter and advise us how to proceed: Between grids 11 and 12 on grid M.2, there are 7 joist tails that are too short, which carry the outside building angle. Attached is a photo of the iron workers proposed fix. They have added 6x6 tubes and 3x3 angles to the tails of the joists to carry the outside building angle. Is this acceptable? Suggested Response Cost Impact: Unknown Estimated Cost Amount: 0.00 Schedule Impact: Unknown Impact Day Type: Calendar Day Estimated Impact Days: 0.00 Further information regarding the above question (question clarification): Please respond no later than 20-Dec-2013 to minimize delay or interference with our ability to proceed with the work. Reply To: Nolan P Beron Company: Ryan Companies US,Inc. Please respond via Froliance if you have a Proliance User Account,otherwise please respond via email. Reply: this is acceptable Further information regarding the above reply (answer clarification): Reply provided by: Jeff Graham Company: Thorson Baker&Associates Attachmentsf References: � SG^v joist tail iZFi.pdf � �� , � -- x � Issue Date: 2013l01/01 Rev No.: 0 � � v � ;�.. a r, a..� � `"i�; �� -. *'; � �� ',�: � � . �. �� .'��' :<"� � - �� Special Inspection Daily Report City of Eagan, MN. Page 1 of 1 Repo�Ro.: Structural Steel#4 Date of�his Repor�t: 1-'i3-i4 Project Name: Building 500 Project No.: BL-12-04579A Project Address: 3905 Eagan Outlets Parkway Ctient: Paragan Outlets Eagan Client Project No.: Weather: Partly Cioudy PM Brad McCarter Temperature: 30 ° F Type of Inspection: Inspection Coverage: ❑ Continuous � ❑ Masonry ❑ Rebar Placement ❑ Foundations ❑ Special Cases: � Periodic �Welding & Bolting ❑ Concrete ❑ Fireproofing ❑ Piles& Piers ❑ Tendon Placement ❑ Soils Did the architect or engineer authorize changes to City-approved plans? ❑ Yes (Listed Below) ❑ No Description and location of work cornpleted: _ _ _ _ _ . __ . _ _ Visual weld observations were performed in accordance with AWS D1.1 and D1_3 criteria on the fallov+ring: 1) Puddfe welds and side lap fasteners at Roof Level Grid K-M.2 4-13 per structural details. No discrepancy noted 2) Deck support angle/splice bar fiflet welds at Roaf Level Grid K-M.2 4-13. No discrepancy noted . 3} Tower framing tube steel/x-brace angle fillet welds Grid K-M.2 4-18.7. No discrepancy noted 4) Lower girt tube steel to plate fillet welds (mid-level tube) Grid K-M.2 4-18.7. No discrepancy nated List tests performed: _ _ . __. _ __ _ _ __ Visual • Are there any discrepancies noted from this day's observations? Yes ❑ No � • Ars there any outstanding discrepancies on this project? Yes ❑ No � o If yes, see attached Summary Sheet. • Report given to Contractor. Yes � No ❑ To the best of our knowledge,work inspected was done in aecardance with the approved plans, spec�cations, and applicable workmanship provisions of the current IBC, excepf as noted above. Signed: Date: 1-13-14 Print Fult Name: Daniel P. Graham l.D. No.: 1054095 S1&S2 - �; ��-° ,�� ,� ; Issue€3ate; 2013(�1l�9 Rev No.: f� �� .- �,� .: � � �� t � � �� . �� ti��'� � �,�,�� _� Special Inspection Qaily Report �� ,�.._ �. City of Eagan, MN. Page 1 of 1 Report No.: Structural Steel#5 �ate of this Report. 1-15-14 Project Name: Building 500 Project No.: BL-12-04579A Project Address: 3905 Eagan Outlets Parkway Client: Paragon Outlets Eagan Client Project No.: Weather: Partiy Cloudy PM Brad McCarter Temperature: 30° F Type of irtspection: Inspection Coverage: ❑ Corrtinuous ❑ Masonry ❑ Rebar Placement ❑ Foundations ❑ S�cial Cases: � Periodic � Welding �Bolting ❑ Goncrete ❑ Fireproofing ❑ Piles&Piers ❑Tendon Placement ❑ Soils Did ths architect or engineer authorize changes to Gity-approved plans? ❑Yes (Listed Belaw) ❑ No Description and focatian of work comp}eted; _ _ _ __ _ 1} PerFormed visual observations of A325 TC Bolts. Roof framing grid J.8-M.S,4.44-19.1. No Discrepancies Noted. _ _ _ List tests performed: _ _ __ _ _ Visual � Are there any discrepancies noted from this day's observations? Yes ❑ No � ■ Are there any outstanding discrepancies an this project? Yes ❑ No � � If yes, see attacheti Summary Sheet. • Report given to Contractor: Yes � No ❑ To the best of our knowledge,work inspected was�one in accordance with the approved plans, s�ecifications, and applicable workmanship provisions of the current 1BC, except as noted above. Signed: ��----"�— Date: 1-15-14 Prirrt Fut1 Name: Troy Baumann LD. IUo.: 5067860 S1&S2 Providing engineering and environmentat solutions since 4957 a "� '° � Issue Date: 2Ai3101lfl9 Rev fUo.: D _ ;,�a �`� � �� -°- �� t, �� .�;�� ;; ,�� .�'�� - ��-�� Speciai Inspection Daily Report City of Eagan, MN. Page 1 of 1 Re�crt No.: Strt,ictural Steei�S Date of this R�poet: 1-25-14 Project Name: Building 500 Rroject No.: BL-12-04579A Project Address: 3905 Eagan Outlets Parkway Ciient: Paragon Outlets Eagan Client Project No.: Weather: Partly Cloudy PM Brad McCarter Temperature: 30° F Type of Inspection: inspection Coverage: ❑ Corrtinuous ❑ Masonry ❑ Rebar Placement ❑ Foundations ❑ Special Cases: � Periodic � Welding& Botting ❑ Concrete ❑ Fireproofing ❑ Piles&Piers ❑Tendon Placement ❑ Soils Did the architect or engineer authorize changes to City-approved plans? ❑Yes (Listed Below} ❑ No Description and)ocation of work completed. __ _ _ The foliawing visual observafions were perfiormed on bar jaists from stab on grade(various areas with damaged chords/lacings). Results as follow to be reviewed by the joist supplier, Nucor: *A) Grid L-M, 12-13,2nd joist Sauth of L,6th apex from 12 towards 13, east diagonal bent approz. 1J2" *B} Grid K-L, 5-6, 1 st joist North af L, 6th apex firom 5 towards 6, east diagonal bent approx. 1/2" *C) Grid K-L, 8-9, 2nd joist North of L, 6th apex from 8 towards 9, east diagonal bent approx. 1/2" *D} Grid K-L,$-9, 3rd joist North of L, 6th apex from 8 towards 9, east diagonal bent approx. 1/2" *E} Grid K-L, 17, joist North of L,6th apex from east diagonal bent approx. 1/2" ___ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - __ _ List tests pertormed: _ _ _ Visual • Are there any discrepancies noted from this day's observations? Yes � No ❑ ■ Are theee any outs#anding discrepancies on fhis project? Yes � No ❑ o If yes, see attached 8ummary Sheet. ■ Report given to Contrador: Yes � No ❑ To ihe best of our knawledge,work inspected was done in accorriance writh the approved plans, specifica#ions, and applicable workmanship provisions of the current lBC, except as noted above. S igned: ��— Date: 1-29-14 Rri�rt Full Name: Troy Baumann i.D. No.: 5Q67860 S1&S2 Providing engineering and environmenta/sotutions since 1957 � � � ��`�.� � � . ��,�� ' issue Date: 2413/01/01 Rev No.: 0 �'h�. , 'F'�� Y �h _.Y� � ' �"�� a -�t 3 r�'",�, . �� s � ��.��,..�`"s.�.' � '; .. � � ��=g Speciaf inspection Daily Report .�,:�.� �� :{� w City of Eagan, MN. Page 1 of 1 �teport No.: Structurai Stee!�? Date of this Rep�r±: 4-14-14 Project Name: Building 500 Project No.: BL-12-04579A Project Address: 3905 Eagan Outlets Parkway Client: Paragon Outlets Eagan Client Project No.: Weather: Indoors PM Brad McCarter Temperature: 60 ° F Type of Inspection: Inspection Coverage: ❑ Continuous ❑ Masonry ❑ Rebar Placement ❑ Foundations ❑ Special Cases: � Periodic �Welding & Bolting ❑ Concrete ❑ Fireproofing ❑ Piles &Piers ❑Tendon Placement ❑ Soiis Did the architect or engineer authorize changes to City-approved plans? ❑Yes (Listed Below} ❑ No Description and location of work completed: . _ . _ _ _ �sual weld observations were performed in accordance with AWS D1.1 2010 criteria on outstanding discrepancies on Report#6 1-29-14 Item A) Grid L-M, 12-13, 2nd joist South of L, 6th apex from 12 towards 13, east diagonal bent approx. 1/2", Item S} Grid K-L, 5-6, 1st jaist North of L, 6th apex from 5 towards 6,east diagonal bent approx. 1/2", ftem C) Grid K-L, 8-9, 2nd joist North of L, 6th apex from 8 towards 9, east diagonal bent approx. 1/2", Item D) Grid K-L, 8-9, 3rd joist North of L, 6th apex from 8 towards 9, east diagonal bent approx. 1/2"and Item E) Grid K-L, 17, joist North of L, 6th apex from east diagonal bent approx. 1!2"have now been repaired/reinforced per Nucor fixes_ No discrepancy noted 1) Bar joistJtruss girder bottom chord to column stabilizer fillet welds at Roof Level Grid J.8-M 26.8-40.8 per Nucor Vulcraft details a�u S5.1 notes. Pdo discr�pancy noted Z) Uplift angle from bar joist to truss girder/beam fillet welds at Roof Level Grid J.8-M 26.8-40.8 per Nucor Vulcraft details and S5.1 details. No discrepancy noted List tests performed: _ __ _ Visual _ _ ._ _ _ _ _ _ ._ _ _ _ ■ Are there any discrepancies noted from this day's observations? Yes ❑ No � ■ Are there any outstanding discrepancies on this project? Yes ❑ No � � If yes, see attached Summary Sheet. • Report given to Contractor: Yes � No ❑ To the best of our knowledge, work inspected was done in accordance with the approved plans, specifications, and appticable workmanship provisions of the current IBC, except as noted above. � Signed: `�� Date: 4-14-14 Print Ful! Plame: Daniel P. Graham l.D. No.: 1054095 S1&S2 f � �s� � � �� ; issue Date: 2093(01/01 itev No.: 0 � � � � �.�' "� �.�� A ��" � ` ''� ��a6 ' � � �� _Y �� ; Summary of Discrepancies Needing Correction or Review � � � by the Design Engineer or Architect �� . , Project Name: Paragon Outlets Eagan Project Address: Building 500 The following items must be reviewed by the engineer and/or corrected andlar inspected before work can cantinue in the area. Report No. Report Description Resolution to O/C Status Date Discre anc The following visual observations were performed on har joists fram slab on grade(various areas with damaged chords/lacings). Results as follow to be reviewed by the joist supplier,Nucor. *A) Grid L-M, 12-13,2nd joist South of L,6th apex from 12 towards 13,east diagonal bent approx. 1/2" *B) Grid K-L,5-6, 1st joist North of L,6th apex from 5 repaired per ciosed 4-14- 6 1-29-14 towards 6,east diagonal bent approx. 1/2" Nucor fixes 14 *C) Grid K-L, 8-9,2nd joist North of L,6th apex from 8 towards 9,east diagonal bent approx. 1/2" *D) Grid K-L,8-9,3rd joist North of L,6th apex from 8 towards 9,east diagonal bent approx. 1/2" *E) Grid K-L, 17, joist North of L,6th apex from east diagonal bent a prox. 1/2"