3519 Sawgrass Tr E
r.~ r
c 110o.,00 Use BLUE or BLACK Ink
Ea For OfficeUse----___--
City o1 o11 j Permit 1 J
3830 Pilot Knob Road t ~ Permit Fee: a -1-44 I
Eagan MN 55122 I
Phone: (651) 675-5675 j Date Received:
Fax: (651) 675-5694 1 I
I Staff: I
I
I
S W I~a~31
2013 RESIDENTIA"/L BUILDING PERMIT' PPLICATION
Date: Site Address: 35I Sew ric-S. '-T~-1
Unit
Resident/ Name: LPhone:_52-2
~
Owner Address /City /Zip:
Applicant is: Owner Contractor
Type of Work Description of work: AJew_UQIm., (~'Aq4r Lc.c~),011
Construction Cost: Multi-Family Building: (Yes / No
Company: L evvl v t A Ir' Contact:
Contractor Address: 16305 30o -M- f~, e City: R Igoe
State: yV Zip: Phone: q5z-.~q -
License q l~ Lead Certificate
If the project is exempt from lead certification, please explain why: (see Page 3 for additional information)
1
COMPLETE THIS AREA ONLY IF CONSTRUCTING A NEW BUILDING
In the last 12 months, has the City of Eagan issued a permit for a similar plan based on a master plan?
_Yes _No If yes, date and address of master plan:
Licensed Plumber: CIav-x c er Al P-r-kairl I on I Phone: -TaG q15` J f ~
Mechanical Contractor:
Phone:
Sewer & Water Contractor: 1~~La S ~~i(/~ Cc "44' Phone: 2-q& _ /ryZyCt I
NOTE; Plans and supporting documents, that you submit are considered to be public' information. Portions of
the information may be classified as port-public if you provide specific reasons that would permit the City to
-conclude that the are trade secrets.
CALL BEFORE YOU DIG. Call Gopher State One Call at (651) 454-0002 for protection against underground utility damage. Call 48 hours
before you intend to dig to receive locates of underground utilities. www.aooherstateonecall ora
I hereby acknowledge that this information is complete and accurate; that the work will be in conformance with the ordinances and codes of the City of
Eagan; that I understand this is not a permit, but only an application for a permit, and work is not to start without a permit; that the work will be in
accordance with the approved plan in the case of work which requires a review and approval of plans.
Exterior work authorized by a building permit Issued In accordance with the Minnesota State Bull
dyys mlt Issuanc . 9 e must within 180
x
Applicant's Prin d ame x t
ApplicaZt'
atur
e
Page 1 of 3
`3Sl ~ SAw~i~gs ~Tv'_ ~Y
DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE ,
SUB TYPES
- Foundation - Fireplace _ Porch (3-Season)
_ Storm Damage
- Single Family Garage _ Porch (4-Season)
- Multi _ Deck Exterior Alteration (Single Family)
Porch (Screen/Gazebo/Pergola) Exterior Alteration (Multi)
01 ofV Plex - Lower Level Pool -
Accessory Building - -Miscellaneous
WORK TYPES
- New Interior Improvement
Addition ~ Siding _ Demolish Building'
- Move Building _ Reroof Demolish Interior
Alteration _ Fire Repair -
_ Windows Demolish Foundation
- Replace -Repair -
- Egress Window Water Damage
- Retaining Wall
*Demolition of entire building - give PCA handout to applicant
DESCRIPTION
Valuation/ Occupancy
Plan Review MCES System
Code Edition SAC Units
(25%_ 100% Zoning ty Y')
Census Code City Water
Stories Booster Pump
# of Units Square Feet -0
# of Buildings PRV J~- EIH Length / Fire S rinklers
Type of Construction VN Width p
REQUIRED INSPECTIONS
Footings (New Building)
Meter Size:
Footings (Deck)
Final / C.O. Required
Footings (Addition) Final / No C.O. Required
Foundation HVAC _ Gas Service Test Gas Line Air Test
Drain Tile Other:
Roof: -Ice & Water -Final Pool: -Footings Air/Gas Tests -Final
Framing
Fireplace: Rough In ~Air Test Siding: -Stucco Lath tone Lat -Brick
Insulation -XFinal Windows
Retaining Wall: _ Footings _ Backfill Final
Sheathing Radon Control
Sheetrock Erosion Control
Reviewed By: , Building Inspector
RESIDENTIAL FEES ~
Base Fee W
Y, ,
Surcharge
Plan ReviewQ sf
MCES SAC
City SAC
Utility Connection Charge f t P n
S&W Permit & Surcharge
Treatment Plant' n~Copies
TOTAL A ,
~/P4e2of3
New Construction Energy Code Compliance Certificate
Per N 1101.8 Building Certificate. A building certificate shalt be posted in a permanently visible location inside Dale Certificate Posted
the building. The certificate shall be completed by the builder and shall list infornation and values of
components listed in Table NI 10L8.
Mailing Address of the Dwelling or Davetang Unit City.
3519 SAWGRASS TRAIL EAST EAGAN
Name of Residential Contractor MN License Number
THERMAL ENVELOPE RADON SYSTEM
Type: Check All That Apply X Passive (No Fan )
c u -
Active (01itb fan and monometer or
E' h > o1het system monitoring 4vice )
c a Fi
u 4 U
Pa OQ °~i U a
Insulation Location z _ U 0 5
z w w t w° i:2 iii Other Please Describe Here
Below Entire Slab X
Foundation Wall 10 INTERIOR
Perimeter of Slab on Grade X
Rim Joist (Foundation) 10 INTERIOR
Rim Mil (1St: Floor+) 10 INTERIOR'
Wall 21
Ceilin ;flat 44
Ceilin , vaulted 44
Bay Wiadotts or cantilevered areas 38 21 10 5
Bonus room over garage X
Describe other insnlatedareas-
Windows & Doors Heating or Cooling Ducts Outside Conditioned Spaces
Average 1.1-Factor (excludes skylights and one door) U: 0.28 Not applicable, all ducts located in conditioned space
Solar Heat Gain Coefficient (SHOC): 0.29 X R-value R-8
MECHANICAL SYSTEMS Make-up Air Select a Type
Appliances Heating System Domestic Water Heater Coolie System X Not required per mech. code
Fuel Type Natural Gas . NaturaLGas ' Electric Passive
Manufacturer Lennox AO Smith Lennox Powered
interlocked with exhaust device-
Model ML193UH070XP24B. GPVH50N 13ACX-024-230 Describe:
Input in Capacity in Output in 2 Other, describe:
Rating or Size BTUS: 66,000 Gallons: 50 Tons:
Heat 46
l oss:' ,471 Heat Gain' 15,691 Location of duct or system:
Structure's. Calculated '
AFUE or SEER:
HSPF% 13
93 Calculated
Efficiency coolie load: 18,425 Clin's
PLAN KINGSTON " round duct OR
Mechanical Ventilation System " metal duct
Describe any additional or combined heating or cooling systems if installed: (e.g. two f imaces or air Combustion Air Select a Type
source heat pump with gas back-up furnace): Not required per mech. code
Select Type X Passive
Heat Recover Ventilator (HRV) Capacity in cfins: Low: High: Other, describe:
Energy Recover Ventilator (ERV) Capacity in cftms: Low: High: Location of duct or system:
X Continuous exhausting fall(s) rated capacity in cfins: 80 Mechanical Room
Location of fan(s), describe: Owners bath Cfm's
Capacity continuous ventilation rate in cfins: 60 " Insulated Flex
Total ventilation (intermittent +continuous) rate in cfins: 435 " metal duct
Created by BAM version 052009
PLAN REVIEW FOR COMPLIANCE WITH AIRCRAFT NOISE ORDINANCE
Compliance with Procedures to Ensure
Submitter: Noise Impact Area Adequate Noise Attenuation:
Lennar Airport - MSP International Exterior wall construction:
1630536th Ave. No. Noise Zone - 4 LP Smart Board
Suite 600 15/32" sheathing
Plymouth, MN 55446 New Infill Residence is a "COND" Tyvek wrap
952-249-3000 use in Noise Zone 4 2x6 studs 16" O.C.
R-21 batt insulation with 1/2" gypsum board
Roof Construction:
Plan Reviewed: /~O~e7 A/ A'37HQS~1L~t f't/Ltg oT Peaked roof with manufactured trusses 24" O.C.
Roof vents
351q `JJC'cRIA 'TftA?L Shingles
Information Submitted: 15# felt
Annotated architectural drawings including: 1/2" sheathing
Blown insulation R-44
Windows: Atrium 5/8" gypsum board
Swinging Patio Doors: Atrium
Entry Doors: Therma Tru Mechanical Ventilation System:
Skylights: N/A 3-ton central air conditioning unit
Compliance with STC Requirements: Window, Door Frame, Perimeter and Other Seals:
All window and door openings are to be caulked
Average window/wall area for exterior wall: D 0/ with butyl-based caulk
O
With this window/wall area ratio and STC 40 walls, windows Fireplace Chimney Cap:
with an STC 30 can be used to meet the noise reduction Built-in flue damper, chimney cap, glass enclosed
requirements;
Ventilation Duct Exterior Wall Penetrations:
Summary: All exterior ducts will have bends as required
by the ordinance
Other measures including duct bends and caulking are being
taken to ensure minimum transmission of noise through the Door and Window Construction:
exterior building shell so that the construction should meet Windows: Atrium (30 STC)
the compatibility guidelines.
Sliding Patio Doors: Atrium (30 STC)
Therefore, the materials and construction as proposed should
meet the requirements of the Eagan aircraft noise ordinance. Entry Doors: Therma Tru (29 STC)
Skylights: N/A
Review Completed (date): TUty 9 041
Other Exterior Wall Penetrations:
Review Completed by: Tom Tamte Sill sealer between plates and blocks
Ventilation, Makeup and Combustion Air Calculations
Submittal Form For New Dwellings
These blank submittal forms and instructions are available at the City website and at City Halt. The completed form must be submit-
ted in .duplicate, at.the'tlme of applicatlon of a mechanical permit for new construction. Additional forms may be downloaded and printed at;
Site address 1 S-l L ~r~ f / / Date
p tf3
Contractor • Completed
l .c e By 6
Section A
Ventilation Quantity
(Determine quantity by using Table N1104.2 or Equation 11-1)
Square feet (Conditioned area Including HZI-CT-ritinuous basement-finished or unfinished) tal required ventilation Number of bedrooms ventilation JIM
Directions - Determine the total and continuous ventilation rate by either using Table N1104.2 or equation 11-1.
The table and equation are below.
Table N1304.2
Total and Continuous Ventilation Rates (in cfm)
Number of Bedrooms
1 2 3 4 5 6
Conditioned space (in Total/ Total/ Total/ Total/ Total/ Total/
sq• ft.) continuous continuous continuous continuous continuous continuous
1000-1500 60/40 75/40 90/4S 105/53 120/60 135/68
1501-2000 70/40 85/43 100/50 115/58 130/65 145/73
2001-2500 80/40 9S/48 110/55 125/63 140/70 155/78
2501-3000 90/45 105/53 120/60 135/68 150/75 165/83
3001-3500 100/50 115/58 130/65 145/73 160/80 175/88
3501-4000 110/55 125/63 140/70 155/78 170/85 185/93
4001-4500 120/60 135/68 150/75 165/83 180/90 195/98...:.1
4501-5000 130/65 145/73 160/80 175/88 190/95 205/103
5001-5500 140/70 155/78 170185 185/93 200/100 215/108.
5501-6000 150/75 165/83 180/90 195/98 210/105 225/113'
Equation 11-1
(0.02 x square feet of conditioned space) + [15 x (number of bedrooms + 1)) = Total ventilation rate (cfm)
Total ventilation - The mechanical ventilation system shall provide sufficient outdoor air to equal the total ventilation rate average,
for each one-hour period according to the above table or equation. For heat recovery ventilators (HRV) and energy recovery ventila-
tors (ERV) the average hourly ventilation capacity must be determined in consideration of any reduction of exhaust or out outdoor
air intake, or both, for defrost or other equipment cycling.
Continuous ventilation - A minimum of 50 percent of the total ventilation rate, but not less than 40 cfm, shall be provided, on a con-
tinuous rate average for each one-hour period. The portion of the mechanical ventilation system intended to be continuous may
have automatic cycling controls providing the average flow rate for each hour is met.
WSAFETINKlVent-makeup-comb air submittal (2).docx Page 1 of 6
Section B
Ventilation Method
(Choose either balanced or exhaust only)
Balanced, HRV (Heat Recovery Ventilator) or ERV (Energy Recov- ® Exhaust only
ery Ventilator) - cfm of unit In low must not exceed continuous venti- Continuous fan rating in dm
lation rating by more than 100%.
Low cfm: High cfm: Continuous fan rating in cfm (capacity must not exceed
continuous ventilation rating by more than 100%) chi'
Directions -Choose the method of ventilation, balanced or exhaust only. Balanced ventilation systems are typically HRV or ERV's.
Enter the low and high cfm amounts. Low c fm airflow must be equal to or greater than the required continuous ventilation rate and
less than 100% greater than the continuous rate. (For instance, if the low cfm is 40 cfm, the ventilation fan must not exceed 80 cfm.)
Automatic controls may allow the use of a larger fan that is operated a percentage of each hour.
Section C
Ventilation Fan Schedule
Description Location Continuous intermittent
U
Directions - The ventilation fan schedule should describe what the fan is for, the location, cfm, and whether it is used for continuous
or intermittent ventilation. The fan that is chose for continuous ventilation must be equal to or greater than the low c fm air rating
and less than 100% greater than the continuous rate. (For instance, if the low cfm is 40 cfm, the continuous ventilation fan must not
exceed 80 cfm.) Automatic controls may allow the use of a larger fan that is operated a percentage of each hour.
Section D
Ventilation Controls
(Describe operation and control of the continuous and intermittent ventilation
c,i r C
Directions -Describe the operation of the ventilation system. There should be adequate detail for plan reviewers and Inspectors to verify design and
installation compliance. Related trades also need adequate detail for placement of controls and proper operation of the building ventilation. If
exhaust fans are used for building ventilation, describe the operation and location of any controls, indicators and legends. if an ERV or HRV is to be
installed, describe how it will be installed. if it will be connected and interfaced with the air handling equipment, please describe such connections as
detailed in the manufactures' Installation Instructions. If the installation instructions require or recommend the equipment to be interlocked with the
air handling equipment for proper operation such interconnection shall be made and described
Section E
Make-up air
Passive (determined from calculations from Table 501.3.1)
Powered (determined from calculations from Table 501.3.1)
Interlocked with exhaust device (determined from calculation from Table 501.3.1)
Other, describe:
Location of duct or system ventilation make-up air: Determined from makeup air opening table
CFm size and type (round, rectangular, flex or rigid)
(NR means not required)
Page 2 of 6
Directions -In order to determine the makeup air, Table 501.3.1 must be filled out (see below). For most new installations, column A
will be appropriate, however, if atmospherically vented appliances orsolid fuel appliances are installed, use the appropriate column.
For existing dwellings, see iMC501.3.3. Please note, if the makeup air quantity is negative, no additional makeup air will be re-
quired for ventilation, if the value is positive refer to Table 501.3.2 and size the opening. Transfer the cfm, size of opening and type
(round, rectangular, flexor rigid) to the last line of section D. The make-up air supply must be installed per 1MC501.3.2.3.
Table 501.3.1
PROCEDURE TO DETERMINE MAKEUP AIR QUANITY FOR EXHAUST EQUIPMENT IN DWELLINGS
(Additional combustion air will be required for combustion appliances, see KAIR method for calculations
One or multipltiple fan- One atmospherically vent Multiple atmospherical-
vent or direct pliances and gas or oil appliance or ly vented gas or oil
pliances or no or direct vent one solid fuel appliance appliances or solid fuel
tion applianceappliances
Column C Column D
Columumn a
1.
a) pressure factor 0.15 0.09 0.06 0.03
(cfm/sf)
b) conditioned f loor area (sf) (including 'J
unfinished basements)
Estimated House Infiltration (cfm): (la 5n 5...
x lb].
2. Exhaust Capacity
a) continuous exhaust-only ventilation
system (dm); (not applicable to ba-
lanced ventilation systems such as
HRV
b) clothes dryer (cfm) 135 135
135 135
c) 80% of largest exhaust rating (dm); . QK i'CY7
Kitchen hood typically
(not applicable if recirculating system
or if powered makeup air is electrically tom:
interlocked and match to exhaust)
d) 80% of next largest exhaust rating
(cfm); bath fan typically Not
(not applicable if recirculating system
or if powered. makeup air is electrically Applicable
interlocked and matched to exhaust)
Total Exhaust Capacity (cfm); 413~--
(2a + 2b +2c + 2d]
3. Makeup Air Quantity (dm)
a) total exhaust capacity (from above)
b) estimated house Infiltration (from
above)
Makeup Air Quantity (cfm);
[3a-3b] Al.
(if value Is negative, no makeup air is
needed)
4. For makeup Air Opening Sizing, refer
to Table 501.4.2
A. Use this column if there are other than fan-assisted or atmospherically vented gas or oil appliance or if there are no combustion appliances. (Power vent
and direct vent appliances may be used.)
B.- - Use this column If there is one fan-assisted appliance per venting system. (Appliances other than atmospherically vented appliances may also be in-
cluded.)
C. Use this column If there is one atmospherically vented (other than fan-assisted) gas or oil appliance per venting system or one solid fuel appliance.
D. Use this column if there are multiple atmospherically vented gas or oil appliances using a common vent or if there are atmospherically vented gas or oil
appliances and solid fuel appliances.
Page 3 of 6
Makeup Air Opening Table for New and Existing Dwelling
Table 501.3.2
One or multiple power One or multiple fan- One atmospherically Multiple atmospherically
vent, direct vent ap- assisted appliances and vented gas or oil ap- vented gas or oil ap- Duct di-
pliances, or no combus- power vent or direct pllance or one solid fuel pliances or solid fuel ameter
tion appliances vent appliances appliance appliances
Column A Column B Column C Column D
Passive opening 1-36 1-22 1-15 1-9 3
Passive opening 37-66 23-41 16-28 10-17 4
Passive opening 67-109 42 - 66 29 - 46 18 - 28 5
Passive opening 110-163 67-100 47-69 29-42 6
Passive opening 164-232 101-143 70-99 43-61 7
Passive opening 233 - 317 144-19S 100-135 62 - 83 8
Passive opening 318-419 196-258 136-179 84-110 9
w/motorized damper
Passive opening 420 - 539 259-332 180 - 230 111-142 30
w/motorized damper
Passive opening S40 -679 333- 419 231-290 143 -179 11
w/motorized damper
Powered makeup air >679 >419 >290 >179 NA
Notes:
A. An equivalent length of 100 feet of round smooth metal duct is assumed. Subtract 40 feet for the exterior hood and ten feet for each 90- degree elbow to
determine the remaining length of straight duct allowable.
8. If flexible duct is used, increase the duct diameter by one Inch. Flexible duct shall be stretched with minimal sags. Compressed duct shall not be accepted.
C. Barometric dampers are prohibited In passive makeup air openings when any atmospherically vented appliance Is installed.
D. Powered makeup air shall he electrically interlocked with the largest exhaust system.
Sections F
Combustion air
Not required per mechanical code (No atmospheric or power vented appliances)
Passive (see IFGC Appendix E, Worksheet E-1) Size and type
Other, describe:
Explanation - ff no atmospheric or power vented appliances are installed, check the appropriate box, not required. If a power vented
or atmospherically vented appliance installed, use iFGCAppendix E, Worksheet E-1 (see below). Please enter size and type. Combus-
tion air vent supplies must communicate with the appliance or appliances that require the combustion air.
Section F calculations follow on the next 2 pages.
Page 4 of 6
Directions - The Minnesota Fuel Gas Code method to calculate to size of a required combustion air opening, is called the Known Air
Infiltration Rate Method. For new construction, 4b of step 4 is required to be felled out.
"GC dix E, Worksheet E-1
Combustion Air Calculation Method
e, Boiler, and/or Water Heater in the Same Space)
plete vented combustion appliance Information.
iler:
od _ Fan Assisted k Direct Vent Input: Btu/hr
or Power Vent
er:
_ Draft Hood Fan Assisted _ Direct Vent Input: 56) C6 0 Btu/hr
or Power
Vent
Calculate the volume of the Combustion Appliance Space (CAS) containing combustion appliances. ¢ ~7
includes all spaces connected to one another by code compliant openings. CAS volume: J / /L,
ft3
etermine Air Changes per Hour (ACH)1 L x W x H L W H
lt ACH values have been incorporated into Table E-1 for use with Method 4b (KAIR Method).
year of construction or ACH is not known, use method 4a (Standard Method).
etermine Required Volume for Combustion Air. (DO NOT COUNT DIRECT VENT APPLIANCES)
p4a.5tandarddMethhod
dard Method
/hr input of all combustion appliances input:
Btu/hr
dard Method column in Table E-1 to find Total Required TRV: ft'
(TRV)
If CAS Volume (from Step 2) Is greater than TRV then no outdoor openings are needed.
If CAS Volume (from Step 2) Js less than TRV then go to STEP S.
4b. Known Air Infiltration Rate (KAIR) Method (DO NOT COUNT DIRECT VENT APPLIANCES)
Total Btu/hr Input of all fan-assisted and power vent appliances Input: 5"o~t? Btu/hr
Use Fan-Assisted Appliances column in Table E-1 to find RVFA: 7 ~p ft3
Required Volume Fan Assisted (RVFA)
Total Btu/hr Input of all Natural draft appliances Input: Btu/hr
Use Natural draft Appliances column in Table E-2 to find RVNFA: ft'
Required Volume Natural draft appliances (RVNDA)
Total Required Volume (TRV) = RVFA+RVNDA TRV= - -3. -7 -re) TRV ft'
If CAS Volume (from Step 2) is greater than TRV then no outdoor openings are needed.
If CAS Volume (from Ste 2) Is less than TRV then o to STEP S.
Step 5: Calculate the ratio of available interior volume to the total required volume.
Ratio =CAS Volume (from Step 2) divided by TRV {from Step 4a or Step 46)
Ratio= 1742 / 7s~ _ r
Step 6: Calculate Reduction Factor (RF}.
RF = 1 minus Ratio RF =1- 70 _ ~Z
Step 7: Calculate single outdoor opening as if aft combustion air is from outside.
Total Btu/hr input of all Combustion Appliances in the same CAS Input: So.
(EXCEPT DIRECT VENT) a Btu/hr
Combustion Air Opening Area (CAOA):
Total Btu/ hr divided by 3000 Btu/hr per in' CAOA = SY0 e'2xi / 3000 Btu/hr per in' _ ) o . in=
Step 8: Calculate Minimum CAOA.
Minimum CAOA = CAOA multi lied by RF Minimum CAOA = to fn"1 x S _ cf. G 7 in'
Step 9: Calculate Combustion Air Opening Diameter (CAOD)
CAOD =1.13 multiplied by the square root of Minimum CAOA CAOD =1.13 V Minimum CAOA = 3. 33 !n. diameter
go up one inch in size If using flex duct
1 If desired, ACH can be determined using ASHRAE calculation or blower door test. Follow procedures in Section
G304.
Page 5 of 6
wrightsofta Project Summary Job: KINGSFIELD TWIN
Date: July 12, 2013
Entire House By: Scott M
ELANDER MECHANICAL INCORPORATED
591 CITATION DRIVE, SHAKOPEE, MN 55379 Phone: 952-445-4692 Fax: 952-445.7487 Email: SALES@ELANDERMECHANI CAL. COM
c~ Project Information
For: f c.rc,~~ J!J~
Notes:
Design Information
Weather: Minneapolis-St Paul Int'I Arp, MN, US
Winter Design Conditions Summer Design Conditions
Outside db -15 OF Outside db 88 OF
Inside db 70 OF Inside db 75 OF
Design TD 85 OF Design TD 13 OF
Daily range M
Relative humidity 50 %
Moisture difference 31 gr/lb
Heating Summary Sensible Cooling Equipment Load Sizing
Structure 33012 Btuh Structure 15411 Btuh
Ducts 854 Btuh Ducts 401 Btuh
Central vent (78 cfm) 7110 Btuh Central vent (78 cfm) 1079 Btuh
Humidification 5495 Btuh Blower 0 Btuh
Piping 0 Btuh
Equipment load 46471 Btuh Use manufacturer's data n
Rate/swing multiplier
Infiltration Equipment sensible load 1569 tuh
Method Simplified Latent Cooling Equipment Load Sizing
Construction quality Tight
Fireplaces 1 (Tight) Structure 1070 Btuh
Ducts 46 Btuh
Heating Cooling Central vent (78 cfm) 1618 Btuh
Area (ft~) 3340 3340 Equipment latent load 2733 Btuh
Volume (ft') 15678 15678
Air changes/hour 0.10 0.05 Equipment total load 1 Btuh
Equiv. AVF (cfm) 26 13 Req, total capacity at 0.70 SHR Pton
Heating Equipment Summary Cooling Equipment Summary
Make Lennox Make Lennox
Trade MERIT 90 Trade 13ACX SERIES - RFC
Model ML193UH070XP24B " Cond 13ACX-024-230'15
AHRI ref 4792132 Coil C33-25*++TDR
AHRI ref 4633724
Efficiency 93AFUE Efficiency 11.0 EER, 13
Heating input 66000 MBtuh Sensible cooling S16213tuh
Heating output 62000 Btuh Latent cooling Btuh
Temperature rise 75 OF Total cooling 23200 Btuh
Actual air flow 773 cfm Actual air flow 773 cfm
Air flow factor 0.023 cfn'l/Btuh Air flow factor 0.049 cfrn/Btuh
Static pressure 0 in H2O Static pressure 0 in H2O
Space thermostat Load sensible heat ratio 0.86
Sold/italic values have been manually overridden
Calculations approved by ACCA to meet all requirements of Manual J 8th Ed.
2013-Jul-19 09:06:55
*wrightSOW Right-SuiteO Universal 2012 12.1.06 RSU13410 Page 1
ACCK ...klop%Heat Losses 20131Lennar Kingston Eagansup Cale - MJ8 Front Door faces: N
WIN
ly 1 1 Job: 2,2013
Compponent Constructions Date: JuKINGSFIELD
, 2013
wrightsoft®
Entire House By: Scott M
ELANDER MECHANICAL INCORPORATED
591 CITATION DRIVE, SHAKOPEE, MN 55379 Phone: 952-4454692 Fax 952-4437487 Email: SALESCELANDERMECHANICAL.COM
Project Information
For:
Design Conditions
Location: Indoor: Heating Cooling
Minneapolis-St Paul Int'IArp, MN, US Indoor temperature (°F) 70 75
Elevation: 837 ft Design TD (°F) 85 13
Latitude: 45°N Relative humidity 50 50
Outdoor: Heating Cooling Moisture difference (gr/lb) 54.5 31.3
Dry bulb (°F) -15 88 Infiltration:
Daily range (°F) - 18 (M) Method Simplified
Wet bulb (°F) - 72 Construction quality Ti ht
Wind speed (mph) 15.0 7.5 Fireplaces l ?Tight)
Construction descriptions or Area u-value Insul R Htg HTM Loss Clg HTM Gain
W auhlR'-'F W-°FA3uh 9tuhAF 9tuh 6tuhl11' Otuh
Walls
12F-Osw: Frm wall, vnl ext, r-21 cov ins, 1/2" gypsum board int no 607 0.065 21.0 5.52 3355 0.93 562
fnsh, 2"x6" wood frm se 302 0.065 21.0 5.52 1670 0.93 280
sw 509 0.065 21.0 5.52 2813 0.93 472
nw 261 0.065 21.0 5.52 1442 0.93 242
all 1680 0.065 21.0 5.53 9279 0.93 1556
15B-10sfc-8: Bg wall, heavy dry or light damp soil, concrete wall, ne 480 0.050 10.0 4.25 2040 0 0
r-10 ins, 8" thk se 304 0.050 10.0 4.25 1292 0 0
sw 480 0.050 10.0 4.25 2040 0 0
nw 294 0.050 10.0 4.16 1224 0 0
all 1558 0.050 10.0 4.23 6596 0 0
Partitions
(none)
Windows
Stonehaven: VINYL Insulated Glass Double Hung; NFRC rated ne 41 0.270 0 23.0 935 23.3 953
(SHGC=0.33)
Stonehaven: VINYL Insulated Glass Double Hung; NFRC rated se 21 0.280 0 23.8 488 27.3 560
(SHGC=0.29) sw 119 0.280 0 23.8 2820 27.3 3239
nw 81 0.280 0 23.8 1926 21.1 1707
nw 10 0.280 0 23.8 229 21.1 203
all 230 0.280 0 23.8 5465 24.9 5709
Doors
11JO: Door, rntl tbrgl type se 19 0.600 6.3 51.0 983 15.3 294
sw 20 0.600 6.3 51.0 1040 15.3 312
all 40 0.600 6.3 51.0 2023 15.3 606
Ceilings
16CR-44ad: Attic ceiling, asphalt shingles roof mat, r-44 cell Ins, 1742 0.022 44.0 1.87 3258 0.86 1493
518" gypsum board int fnsh
2013-Jul-19 09:06:55
* wrightsoft` Right-Suitee Universal 2012 12.1.06 RSU13410 page 1
~GA ...ktop\Heat Losses 20131Lannar Kingston Eagan.rup Cale = MJ8 Front Door faces: N
Floors
20P-38c: Fir floor, frm flr, 12" thkns, carpet flr fnsh, r-5 ext ins, r-38 144 0.030 38.0 2.55 367 0.27 39
cav ins, amb ovr
21A-32t: Bg floor, light dry soil, 8' depth 1598 0.020 0 1.70 2717 0 0
i
2013-Jul-19 09:06:55
* wrightSOW Right-Suke® Universal 2012 12,1.06 RSU13410 Page 2
,4G~ ...ktoplHeat Losses 20131Lennar Kingston Eagan.rup Calc - MJS Front Door faces: N
is
I
3
C
Do
O'D
Zf R4
Z. Vo La cq
a
000 `o
O x a n. o. c) c' z
U U LU
m c `c W 10 a x a m
Q ,J m [1 Y 0 (9 of 1
4 Q j.
k X r
Gi i W N a x ^
C'4 P-
N Q Z CiN C2 X r X c3 fXp o
M V' i4a' ~ N ~ Of l
to
- ~n I
it o 2 Z ;w w W w w w
12 0
C7 co z ®'z z z z z z
a. °o, !L
t
0) CO Q I
z (9 co zw
y R N O Q
a L N N N vi Z x^
o N
s; l0 Z7 i F N F z V i
u [Li L z Q
QU' f C7 co
y
31 !3 3
IW
Uj N Q uj .
s r :C ' V ~ V
N N i7 (j v vj
C; w Lo
i> U N
z m
C9 U~ J M J
3 r Q t Q Q z Fes- chi 6 Q 1
f Sd Q `I i F co _j t
fn fn ' y
W C z z F Z-
. 2 W! L<L c- CD 0 0 j Q >
z z z x to z z 4
n co) Co CO u-- w
O~; 4y1 f ~ ~ O 4 Q p p
;a a
Of
j Z ¢
u o z o o c a
UJ (p ' a& uJ N oo N M N
p. .
? = ` o
i Cw a 0. 0 ~3 2w W f~ a
µ uy a s a x gg x x o X
r'~, . U Q to ° C W c3 A cq
t`pW
° M li i
I ~ ~
LOT SURVEY CHECKLIST FOR RESIDENTIAL
r BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION
PROPERTY LEGAL: 4:11
DATE OF SURVEY: h~~/~J3
LATEST REVISION:
as
a~
c
ca
U
Q ~
O z ¢ DOCUMENT STANDARDS
❑ ❑ Registered Land Surveyor signature and company
❑ ❑ Building Permit Applicant
❑ ❑ Legal description
J;r ❑ ❑ Address
❑ ❑ North arrow and scale
❑ ❑ House type (rambler, walkout, split w/o, split entry, lookout, etc.)
❑ ❑ Directional drainage arrows with slope/gradient %
❑ ❑ Proposed/existing sewer and water services & invert elevation
❑ ❑ • Street name
0 0 • Driveway (grade & width - in R/W and back of curb, 22' max.)
~J ❑ ❑ • Lot Square Footage
❑ ❑ • Lot Coverage
ELEVATIONS
Existing
❑ 0 • Property corners
0 0 Top of curb at the driveway and property line extensions
❑ ❑ Elevations of any existing adjacent homes
❑ ❑ Adequate footing depth of structures due to adjacent utility trenches
❑ ❑ Waterways (pond, stream, etc.)
Proposed
❑ ❑ Garage floor
Jd' 0 0 • Basement floor
❑ ❑ Lowest exposed elevation (walkout/window)
❑ ❑ Property corners
Jd' 0 0 Front and rear of home at the foundation
PONDING AREA (if applicable)
❑ 0 Easement line
❑ ❑ NWL
0 f~ 0 HWL
❑ ❑ Pond # designation
❑ 0 Emergency Overflow Elevation
0 0 • Pond/Wetland buffer delineation
Y • Shoreland Zoning Overlay District
Y' • Conservation Easements
DIMENSIONS
D 0 • Lot lines/Bearings & dimensions
❑ 0 • Right-of-way and street width (to back of curb)
0 ❑ • Proposed home dimensions including any proposed decks, overhangs greater than 2', porches, etc.
(i.e. all structures requiring permanent footings)
❑ ❑ • Show all easements of record and any City utilities within those easements
g 0 ❑ • Setbacks of proposed structure and side yard setback of adjacent existing structures
0 0 • Retaining wall requirements:
Reviewed By: Date
,4~z~
G:/FORMS/Building Permit Application Rev. 11-26-04
C/)
n
o~- en~i- W -r' p W CA M ivQ e~ open Pe~~~e~ oo-oenenSr oo-otnenSr 0
3 C 3 (D N O C 3, -'.-ro O c: 3 artO o
3 0 3 z~ n. O n , T N m D (7 (7 U) 0 a N D
O O 0 rt fl N N N O 0
0 o o 0 •o 0-0 o `n o o m N ° 5•a o~ m
(n 0 0 to
? n S O 0 c 3 W Z O Q Q DO+ 0 ,Z F 0 Q OC O "
to g m N -io o O N N 3 0 h 0 5E: 'n 0 m fl Q p 0 ° D p°
3 0 0 ° o 0 o (n < 0(D m < nco m II
7- M z ° ° p II II II o a ° ° II II I~
D-0 Co ro 0 3 o-F.v 0 0 (n 3 l
oC.oc~~'D °voiQ ° 3 3 ° o m11II(W°NN 11 II(0 00 O
N N
3. rt p 3 O N p- . (D O (D c c- O On (D (D ° (n N O p O)
C m o ~o `n rto~ of ---a(o rt~ II m ~o~v~ II m Wo~~~
. O (D -U , p (n N U)
in° :3 :300 -0'D ~Q(D toll men ~l~ II~~ m~
O O o O (D p (D O O Q i
N 0_ O -^LO to to (n p (n a d c 01 Sam
~:3 M ~
p L. o p O O < 0- spy
6-0 En
o C S o to 03 (D ~ (D p O 0° 20 \ 3
(D (n V 0 to 3 p m a T(D _ 42 l rt
= to
Q v°i o I oD
° o oa E-.:3 to 0
C
0
(n m o o , (D p , (i o \ 1" t` O fr t r
3 0 03 (D~ (D 0 pjCD~
o p 1 (A (D 0
CD *w1111
i
3 (o m o 3 r8
3 ? na 0 0 M~ 0 0 3 96 ~m
-.0 0 :3 0 10
(A 0 (n :3 0
Ul ° , (n
0 o rt o ,
C: D- C 0 :3 CD C
(D -.0 (D r'. \ \
T
3 °o 0 0 a 5 \ Ca
:3 3
00
,0 1
o w
M m 1(89p Or
MZ \ eoso;~o
00 I I N \ e~e9e U \ o N 0
O I fp~a \a n
- 1 \ er A f/,jf X n
W W. CL
'A O O U° I w ca Q
X, 0 03 (D
M -,Do, (891
G7 r S (D (D 1 O Ch I X . W / OD
n+ (n Q-
a v° 0 0 0 ^ x ° 1 03 1 o(D m (891.5) ~ ® C: o
R W.
p rn (n o ° 110. I .0 - - - cD W
a U,
00 U1
co ■ 00 I 1 (892.0 e 0(D 3 .3 = _ + tv ID
0 0 0 ; o ° 0(0 32.00 ep 892.0 01i 110° B ( 0 W
07 0 < 0- CD
0 (1)
Q- rI ° v o'o 'o CD M 0 CD o' o' o' _ 1 I W P \ \ 3 00 31. O i I Q 0 O
o (<D (n m Sr CD N N N (D I~ f1 POsed \ \ -P 00
I I GIN T`
® rn o o o N (89 4.9) 0,4
o o ..°F BPHoposed
~„Q tel. N Q
o (D 3 ° a N A'2 8, ) Use "lam I 0 N ~
N
°o m a m o O v x 4' F•e.\pv I ~`Q I Ro °
-M~~' rt 583 ) I~ 1~~ 7 -1 V')
n n n -D Qrt o~ o o F F o D7 ~ ~
00 00 00 0. N
(0 (0 00 N -P ° 0 m° 0 0 (D - CO V \ 5.8'3 I I (D N) Q (D O Q q
a :f 0 ° CJl co °o ~ cO + p 11 s• 83r ac \ rn I I N N (D z + 010
'J 0
0 3 U1 O a v
Z
0 3 N 41.50 "'9, Gor 3- I N I I --10
W 00 N' 3 (n C) ' 89 2.0 9e~ GO e
rO ' I I Q O C c' 0
D F' a I ~ g 111. SOc°', f I =j o
i _ 0 \ -X 020.5~`~ rv 892.0 O v l~ ? Q Q z
cNO (892.4~se to. 0.42.0 w N° "AI /~I I D Q 0
\ \ S ~Oj o PROPO ED 892.4) m °o m «ti °~I ~'1 :3 C -P
W . DRIVEW <
PROP VI -
~8\ AY DRI OSED o (~l I'I ra
906J 0i\\ 70~ VEWAY 10 0 -A ~I I I11 D~ (D D
7.5% 0
/ I I
0-4 0
OD r-t-
~ I I C7 0 0
0D tT1
CV 70 \ I OY
01
o St 1 r
0-0
(D (14 CA z
to ° U
0 0~ O,A
(D 0-0
(D CL (D IVGR'q S 3
0 D (T F- (0
u) 1< S
rT
(n
. a a 3 RA/~ mm 0
0 (D G) 0
(D #
C) 0 U)
C) C4 (D
D (T)
r-
o rn 0<30 R
m (n :3
p- lD
U) 1-2
ozo rn0rt ?
(D O S O
C
NORP"
0 N r _ m ~ v1
n < <
o (D O_
vl N
3 cn p o <
C: Ort 7
< -0 p
S 3 3
0 (D 0-
.
0
,
Revisions:
1.) 6_13_`3 adStake dress House Certificate of Survey for:
P18NEERengineering a, 6_ls_ls aa~(ess
Lennar Corporation
CIVIL ENGINEERS LAND PLANNERS LAND SURVEYORS LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS
68t-1914 16305 36th Ave N Ste #600
Ph.: (651)
Plymouth
2422 Enterprise Drive Fax: (651) 681-9488 , MN 55446-4270
Project # :.112207005 Phone: 249-3000 / Fax: (952) 404-1909
Mendota Heights, MN 55120 www.pioneereng.com Folder 7386 Drawn by: kks (952)
n ?nnR Pin-, RnoinoPrino
February 21, 2014
Lennar Corporation
16305 36th Ave N, Suite 600
Plymouth, MN 55446
Attn: Rodney Chwialkowski
fv, �\l3z`6
1 hereby certify that this plan, specification or report
was prepared by me or under my direct supervision
and that 1 am a duly licensed professional engineer
under the laws of the Stat, ofJpihnes ota.
Nick Hanson
Date: 2-21-14
Minnesota Registration No. 46665
Subject: Foundation Wall Assessment
3519/3521 Sawgrass Trail, Eagan, MN
Hanson Group Project: 4.041
To Whom It May Concern:
The purpose of this letter is to report the findings of a structural engineering review of the
existing condition of the interior shared house foundation wall at the above address.
ASSIGNMENT
The Hanson Group has been retained to provide a structural engineering review of the existing
cracked condition of the shared foundation wall toward the front of the structure at SS15V3521
Sawgrass Trail in Eagan, MN, as directed by Rodney Chwialkowski of Lennar Corporation.
BACKGROUND
The above referenced home is currently under construction. Cracking toward the front of the
shared house foundation wall between the two residences was noticed by the Builder who is
requesting that an independent structural engineer assess the condition of this area and
comment on the foundation wall.
DESCRIPTION
The residence is a multi -family house with a two-story wood framed structure with a full height
basement. The foundation walls are concrete cast -in-place with a concrete slab -on -grade floor in
the lower level.
Lennar Corporation
Hanson Group Project: 4.041
February 21, 2014
Page 2
OBSERVATION AND COMMENTS
1. The following information was obtained through a site visit on February 19th, 2014 by
Nick Hanson, PE of The Hanson Group:
a. The site visit included visual observation of a very limited portion of the exposed
foundation wall around at the interior exposed areas between the units of the
multi -family residence. At the time of the observations, heat had been introduced
in the lower level foundation; however the main level was unheated.
b. The foundation wall in question is 14" thick concrete cast -in-place at the shared
units and is approximately 8'-4" tall with a future concrete slab -on -grade
basement floor that has not yet been installed.
c. The 14" cast -in-place concrete foundation walls are reportedly reinforced with (2)
rows of #4 horizontal bars (at the top and bottom). The engineering specifications
used by the concrete contractor were submitted to the City for review and
reference prior to the foundation being poured.
d. The foundation wall in question supports the TJ1 floor joists of the main level
above.
e. The crack occurred approximately 16'-0" from the front wall and could be seen
from both units in the lower levels. The foundation wall at this cracked location
was measured with a 48" level and found to be approximately plumb (1/8" +-)
across the level as determined on each side of the interior cracked wall.
f. The crack was approximately 'A" wide with minor spalling of materials. The crack
was relatively vertical with approximately 6"-9" of horizontal variation from top to
bottom.
g. There was no distinctive or measurable offset of the crack from one side to the
other.
h. The footing was measured to have approximately 51/2" of projection on each side
of the concrete wall. There was a'''A" crack through the footing approximately 16"
from the foundation wall crack toward the front of the structure.
i. The footing appeared to be relatively level across the crack with no distinctive
• offset that could be measured by a 48" hand level.
j. The grade is relatively level around the perimeter and was held approximately 6"-
8"down from the top of the full height foundation wall.
k. Grade is reportedly a sandy -clay material (Group 11) and suitable for bearing and
backfill. The soils within this area visually appeared to be consistent with a Sandy -
Clay classification based on the soils exposed.
1. No water intrusion was noted or reported at the crack in question. No movement
of the framing materials above was noted or reported during the construction and
after the wall was in place.
2. The following information is noted in regard to the above observed conditions:
Lennar Corporation
Hanson Group Project: 4.041
February 21, 2014
Page 3
a. A foundation wall of this nature is intended to primarily support vertical Toads
with little horizontal loading requirements and no lateral soil pressures.
b. Based on the above reported information, the foundation wall in question likely
resulted from frost heave at the footing location due to a lack of heat present to
prevent frost. The introduction of heat reportedly brought the crack back closer
to the original condition. The frost protection measures of the Code require that
the interior of the basement be a heated structure. The interior should continue
to have heat present throughout the life of the structure to prevent future frost
heave.
c. The movement that appeared to occur should not dramatically inhibit the ability
of the foundation wall to perform its necessary functions. The crack appears
minor in nature and the current state of this structural element appears in
acceptable condition as the intended load paths have not been permanently
altered to resist the required loads. Due to the fact that the wall is early in the life
of the structure and the crack does lack some continuity however, and epoxy
injection is therefore recommended to regain structural stability and strengthen
the wall.
d. The orientation of the crack indicates that it is suitable for epoxy injection as a
method to re-establish continuity. No substances (water, sealants, paint, etc.)
were noted on the wall that would inhibit a suitable epoxy -to -concrete bond
provided standard manufacturer recommended practices to be completely
followed.
e. The crack within the strip footing will not dramatically inhibit the ability of the
footing to perform its necessary functions. The concrete foundation wall has the
ability to span over this area and does not require any further repair or corrective
action.
f. All waterproofing measures are not discussed in this document as they are non-
structural and outside our expertise. All waterproofing issues and measures are to
be the responsibility of the contractor.
PROFESSIONAL OPINION
3. It is our professional engineering opinion that the existing interior/shared foundation wall
near the front of the multi -family residence noted appears to be suitable for epoxy
injection as a structural repair. The means and methods of the epoxy injection are out of
the scope of this report, and all manufacturers' recommendations are to be closely
followed for the product to fully re-establish the structural continuity sufficiently.
GENERAL
4. The observations and opinions expressed in this report are based on our professional
engineering judgment and professional practice, as well as limited visual observations of
exposed materials only. No testing or removal of materials was performed to determine
physical condition and state of structural foundation components, nor compliance with
Lennar Corporation
Hanson Group Project: 4.041
February 21, 2014
Page 4
the present Building Code. Contact The Hanson Group should evidence contrary to the
above observations and findings noted be found during construction.
5. No other engineering was performed or requested for this project. This document
pertains to the general assessment of the exposed crack at the existing residence located
above only. All waterproofing and verification, as well as means and methods of
application, are the responsibility of the owner and/or contractor.
6. All work shall be done in accordance with this document, standard industry practice, and
the requirements of the Code.
7. These conclusions are based on preliminary and limited examination and analysis
described above. We reserve the right to supplement and/or amend these findings
and/or opinions should new information become available. Concealed discrepancies
and/or defects limit the accuracy and scope of this report. No warranty, either expressed
or implied, for any portion of the structure is given.
If you have any questions, please contact us.
Sincerely,
The Hanlon Group
Nick Hanson, PE
Photo 1: Foundation Wall Crack
L
of Eapn
y
Address: 3519 Sawgrass Tr E Zip: 55122 Permit J#: 112328
The following items were / were not completed at the Final Inspection on: S 1 ~'2 I
Complete Incomplete Comments
Final grade - 6" from siding
Permanent steps - Garage
Permanent steps - Main Entry
Permanent Driveway y, 1
Permanent Gas
Retaining Wall or 3:1 Max Slope
Sod / Seeded Lawn 1~-
Trail / Curb Damage ~l
Porch
Lower Level Finish
Deck
Fireplace ~)ov
• Verify with your builder that roof test caps from the plumbing system have been removed.
• Turn off water supply to the outside lawn faucets before freeze potential exists.
• Call the Engineering Department at (651) 675-5646 prior to working in the right-of-way or installing an
irrigation system.
Building Inspector:
GABuilding InspectionsTORMS\Checklists