Loading...
12/21/1993 - City Council Regular AGENDA REGULAR MEETING EAGAN CITY COUNCIL EAGAN, MINNESOTA MUNICIPAL CENTER BUILDING DECEMBER 21, 1993 6:30 P.M. I. 6:30 - ROLL CALL & PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE (BLUE) II. 6:30 - ADOPT AGENDA & APPROVAL OF MINUTES (BLUE) 0. ( III. 6:35 - RECOGNITION - PLANNING CONSULTANT JOHN S. VOSS : ii.. IV. 6:40 - EAGAN LEGISLATIVE DELEGATION UPDATE - SENATOR DEANNA WEINER/ P. ' REPRESENTATIVE TIM COMMERS/REPRESENTATIVE TIM PAWLENTY V. - DEPARTMENT HEAD BUSINESS (BLUE) VI. - CONSENT AGENDA (PINK) P• c A. PERSONNEL ITEMS Q B. EXTENSION, Autumn Ridge 4th Addition, for Recording Final Plat C. CONTRACT 93-15, Receive Bids/Award Contract, Water Quality Pond Improvements (� {is D. RESOLUTION Authorizing Call of Sperry Tax Increment Bonds 1 ( E. APPROVAL of Deloitte + Touche Engagement Letter for Audit and Arbitrage Rebate P' Services for the Year Ending December 31, 1993 r, ( 0 F. FINAL PLAT, Town Centre 100 - Twelfth Addition (Mann Theaters) 2. Q G. FINAL PLAT, Lexington Meadows ��2 yH. RECEIVE Petition/Schedule Public Hearing, Request for Cedarvale Area Special Service District Legislative Authorization 7 I. APPROVE Joint Powers Agreement (Street Sweeping, Striping & Sealcoating) 1(..117J. PROJECT 662, Receive Feasibility Report/Order Public Hearing (Cedar Grove 7, 8, 10, (2 11 and Applebaum Additions - Street Rehabilitation) (p ! K. PROJECT 665, Receive Feasibility Report/Order Public Hearing (Blackhawk Road - Street Rehabilitation) I L. CONTRACT 93-W, Acknowledge Completion/Authorize City Maintenance (Deerhawk - Services) M. Stonebridge Ponds Addition, Easement Vacation Reimbursement VII. 7:00 - PUBLIC HEARINGS (SALMON) '-. A. ISSUANCE of Multifamily Housing Revenue Refunding Bonds - Surrey Gardens Apartments n,(03 B. ISSUANCE of Multifamily Housing Revenue Refunding Bonds - Aspen Woods of Eagan F ,(p C. PROJECT 666, Waterview Addition - Trunk Sanitary Sewer and Watermain Extension VIII. OLD BUSINESS (ORCHID) p91 A. RECONSIDER Conditions of Preliminary Plat, United Stationers IX. NEW BUSINESS (TAN) D q ! A. FINAL PLAT, United Stationers Vt1B. DUPLEX LOT SPLIT, Custom Design Builders, located at Lot 9, Block 5, Vienna Woods Addition, NE 1/4 of Sec 31 (, ( iD a.C. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT, Panino's of Eagan, to allow on-sale liquor, 3.2 beer or wine in a CSC (Community Shopping Center) district within the Eagan Heights Commercial Park Planned Development on Lot 1, Block 1, Town Centre 100 Sixth Addition, located along the east side of Denmark Avenue, south of Town Centre Drive in the N 1/2 of Sec 15 p g D. LICENSE, On-Sale Liquor, Panino' s of Eagan, 3450 Denmark Drive ` ` ‘ 0E. WAIVER OF PLAT, Commonwealth Land Title Insurance Company, to split a portion of Lot P 14, Block 6, Woodgate 2nd Addition and combine it with Lot 15, Block 6, Woodgate 2nd Addition located along the west side of Hickory Hill in the SE 1/4 of Section 29 (aF. REZONING, Lyman Development Company, of approximately 1.6 AG (Agricultural) acres to fq an R-1 (Single Family) district located along the west side of Highway 3, south of Diffley Road in the NE 1/4 of Section 25 0,24 G. WAIVER OF PLAT, Lyman Development Company, to split Lot 6, Auditor's Subdivision No. P42, Eagan, and Lot 2, Auditor's Subdivision No. 43, Inver Grove Heights, located along the west side of Highway 3, south of Diffley Road in the NE 1/4 of Section 25 /��H. REZONING, Arcon Development Incorporated, of 14.80 AG (Agricultural) acres to an R-1 P° (Single Family) district located along the east side of Dodd Road, west of Highway 3 in Section 36 19A-SL/I. PRELIMINARY PLAT, Waterview Addition/Arcon Development Incorporated, consisting of 20 lots located along the east side of Dodd Road, west of Highway 3 in Section 36. X. ADDITIONAL ITEMS (GOLD) XI. LEGISLATIVE/INTERGOVERNMENTAL AFFAIRS UPDATE (GREY) fl A. RESOLUTION in support of Dakota County's request for state bonding authority, Juvenile Detention and Treatment Facility XII. ADMINISTRATIVE AGENDA (GREEN) XIII. VISITORS TO BE HEARD (for those persons not on agenda) IX. ADJOURNMENT The City of Eagan is committed to the policy that all persons have equal access to its programs, services, activities, facilities and employment without regard to race, color, creed, religion, national origin, sex, disability, age, marital status, sexual orientation, or status with regard to public assistance. Auxiliary aids for persons with disabilities will be provided upon advance notice of at least 96 hours. If a notice of less than 96 hours is received, the City of Eagan will attempt to provide such aid. MEMO TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCILMEMBERS FROM: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES DATE: DECEMBER 17, 1993 SUBJECT: AGENDA INFORMATION FOR THE DECEMBER 21, 1993 CITY COUNCIL MEETING OPT A After approval is given to the December 7, 1993 City Council agenda, the regular meeting minutes for the December 7, 1993 City Council meeting and special meeting minutes for the November 16, 1993, November 23, 1993 and December 7, 1993 meetings, the following items are in order for consideration. RECOGNITION/JOHN S ±[ SS. As the Council is aware,John Voss of Urban Planning&Design has announced that he will no longer be serving as 1,,he City's planning consultant. A copy of his letter in this regard is enclosed on page . Also enclosed on page is a copy of a proclamation recognizing John's service and commitment to the City. Upon adopted by the City Council, the proclamation will be presented to Mr. Voss who will be present at Tuesday's meeting. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve a proclamation recognizing 25 years of service by planning consultant,John Voss, and recognize his contributions to the development of the City. 1 PLAN1VtlNC ALM. 7300 W 147th St. • Suite 504 • Apple Valley, Mn. 5S 4 • PP Y 12 (612)431-4401 AND DESIGN, INC. John S. Voss, President October 27, 1993 Mayor Egan Members of City Council City of Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan MN 55121 Re: Planning Consulting Services Dear Mayor Eagan and Council Members: This letter is notice that Urban Planning & Design, Inc. will no longer serve as the City Planning Consultant effective November 15, 1993, except for any specific contract which may develop between both parties in the future. It has been my pleasure to serve the City for 25 years. During that time I've established lifetime friendships with many of the people involved. I thank the City Staff, Council, Planning Commission, and Park Commission for the many curtesies extended over the years and for the professional opportunity to grow with our great City. Yours Truly, Jo S. Voss Urban Planning& Design, Inc. JV: fmw PLANNING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE SITE DESIGN C CITY OF EAGAN RESOLUTION FOR JOHN VOSS DECEMBER 21, 1993 WHEREAS, John Voss has served the city of Eagan, its staff and the citizens with dedication, loyalty and integrity as a City Planner, and WHEREAS, this service has extended over twenty four and one- half years, since the early days of the Eagan's Parks and Planning Departments, and WHEREAS, John Voss was integrally involved in, and had Opersonal responsibility for the development of Eagan's Zoning rdinance and Comprehensive Guide Plan, and WHEREAS, John Voss was the best "Ship's Captain" the City of Eagan and its Park Committee ever had, NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that John Voss be recognized for his valuable service to the City of Eagan, and BE TT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City of Eagan and its staff extend best wishes to John Voss and his family in future endeavors. SO SAY WE ALL , THIS TWENTY FIRST DAY OF DECEMBER, NINETEEN HUNDRED AND NINETY THREE. Mayor Tom Egan Councilmember Pat Awada Councilmember Shawn Hunter Councilmember Sandra Masin Councilmember Ted Wachter 3 Agenda Information Memo December 21, 1993 City Council Meeting Senator Deanna Wiener, Representative Tim Commers and Representative Tim Pawlenty will be present at Tuesday evening's meeting to provide an update concerning the upcoming legislative session for the City Council. It will also be an opportunity for the Council to briefly provide the legislative delegation with an indication of community priorities for the coming year's Legislature. It is anticipated that the update will take approximately 15 minutes. It would be appropriate to express the City's appreciation for the interest by the legislative delegation in taking this opportunity to be present at Tuesday's meeting. There is no action anticipated on this item at this time. Agenda Information Memo December 21, 1993 City Council Meeting osNT < There are thirteen (13) items on the agenda referred to as consent items requiring one (1) motion by the City Council. If the City Council wishes to discuss any of the items in further detail, those items should be removed from the Consent Agenda and placed under Additional Items unless the discussion required is brief. PERSONNEL ITEMS. A. PERSONNEL ITEMS: Item 1. Seasonal Winter Recreation Leaders--After interviews, it is the recommendation of Recreation Supervisor Oyanagi that the following persons be hired as seasonal winter recreation leaders for the 1993/1994 winter recreation season: Manotham Bounnak,Nancy Chellman, Holly Confer, Robert Foreman, Tim Gill, Aaron Halash, Colin Johnson, Rod Larson, Brock Libby, Gina Prescott, Prentice Rankin, Jason Sakry, Jeffry Schuller, Jason Schwamb, David Soutor and Sam Vaughn. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the hiring of Manotham Bounnak, Nancy Chellman,Holly Confer, Robert Foreman,Tim Gill, Aaron Halash, Colin Johnson, Rod Larson, Brock Libby, Gina Prescott, Prentice Rankin, Jason Sakry, Jeffry Schuller, Jason Schwamb, David Soutor and Sam Vaughn as seasonal winter recreation leaders for the 1993/1994 winter recreation season. Item 2. Contractual Broomball and Boot Hockey Officials--It is the recommendation of Recreation Supervisor Oyanagi that the following persons be contracted with to perform referee services for the adult broomball and boot hockey league games: Mark Bush, Wayne Fox, Rob Hagstrom, Rick Kamrud, Chris Larson, Vincent Mergens, Scott Merkley, Bryan Mohr and Douglas Monro. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve contracting with Mark Bush, Wayne Fox, Rob Hagstrom, Rick Kamrud, Chris Larson, Vincent Mergens, Scott Merkley, Bryan Mohr and Douglas Monro as officials for the adult broomball and boot hockey league games. Agenda Information Memo December 21, 1993 City Council Meeting PERSONNEL ITEMS CONTINUED: Item 3. 1993 Compensation/Benefits for Regular,Temporary and Seasonal Non-Collective Bargaining Employees—Upon direction of the City Council to prepare a compensation adjustment plan for the City's non-collective bargaining employees,the City Administrator, in consultation with the management team, has prepared a recommendation for the Council's consideration. The recommendation takes into account the approved 1994 budget of the City of Eagan, the current Consumer's Price Index (CPI), surveys of other municipalities and the private sector. The amount recommended is below the CPI and is roughly equivalent to the average of increases in other municipalities. The recommendation is for a 2.5%increase in compensation for all non-collective bargaining employees with the exception of the election judges. (NOTE: The compensation for seasonal maintenance workers is covered by a collective bargaining agreement.) The recommendation also includes an increase in the City's contribution toward employee plus dependent health insurance coverage from $286.81 per month to$288.21 per month. The City Administrator also recommends that the car allowances for the City Administrator, Director of Finance, Community Development Director,Director of Public Works and the Director of Parks and Recreation be increased 2.5%and that the paid mileage amount for other employees be set at the Internal Revenue Service mileage amount for 1994. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve a 2.5% increase in compensation for regular, seasonal and temporary non-collective bargaining employees for 1994 (except for election judges), an increase in the City's contribution toward employee plus dependent health insurance coverage for those employees who choose such coverage to $288.21 per month, an increase of 2.5% for car allowances and setting the mileage reimbursement amount at the 1994 IRS mileage amount. Agenda Information Memo December 21, 1993 City Council Meeting EXTENSION OF FINAL PLAT/AU'T'UMN RIDGE 4TH ADDITION, B. Extension,Autumn Ridge 4th Addition,for Recording Final Plat--Pioneer Engineering is requesting a 30 day extension to record its final plat. Staff has been informed that the County Surveyor's Office is backed up on its recording procedures. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the 30 day extension of the final plat approval for the Autumn Ridge 4th Addition. Agenda Information Memo December 21, 1993 City Council Meeting APPROVE BIDS/AWARD CONTRACT/WATER QUALITY POND IMPROVEMENTS C. Contract 93-15,Receive Bids/Award Contract,Water Quality Pond Improvements--Bids for this contract were opened on Thursday morning, December 16, 1993. A copy of the bid tabulation along with staffs recommendation regarding the awarding of this contract will be included with the Administrative Agenda packet on Monday. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM:.To approve the awarding of the contract for Contract 93-15 for Water Quality Pond Improvements to the appropriate qualified low bidder. Agenda Information Memo December 21, 1993 City Council Meeting RESOLUTION/SPERRY TAX INCREMENT BONDS D. Resolution Authorizing Call of Sperry Tax Increment Bonds—There is currently an outstanding principal amount due on the Sperry tax increment bonds of $145,000. The original principal amount issued in 1986 was $700,000. The remaining principal is due for payment on August 1, 1994. Since there are now adequate funds on hand, it is staffs recommendation that these bonds be called at the next available date,which is February 1, 1994, when an interest payment is due. The call will save six months of interest, which is $4,894, and will make the remaining balance and subsequent tax increment collections available to Northwest Airlines per tile terms of the agreement with them for the semi- conductor facility. Attached on page (0 is a copy of the resolution providing for the call. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the resolution calling the Sperry tax increment bonds for redemption. 9 CITY OF EAGAN RESOLUTION CALLING BONDS FOR REDEMPTION BE IT RESOLVED by the City of Eagan, Minnesota, that the City shall call for prior redemption on February 1, 1994, its outstanding General Obligation Tax Increment Bonds, Series 1986, dated July 1, 1986, and the City Clerk is authorized to mail and publish notice of such redemption in the manner required by law. CITY OF EAGAN CITY COUNCIL By: Its Mayor Attest: Its Clerk Motion made by: Seconded by: Those in favor: Those against: CERTIFICATION I, E. J. VanOverbeke, Clerk of the City of Eagan, Dakota County, Minnesota, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted by the City Council of the City of Eagan, Dakota County, Minnesota, in a regular meeting thereof assembled this 21st day of December, 1993. E. J. VanOverbeke, City Clerk Agenda Information Memo December 21, 1993 City Council Meeting APPROVAL/DELOITTE & TOUCHE ENGAGEMENT LETTER FOR AUDIT AND ARBITRAGE REBATE SERVICES E. Approval of Deloitte & Touche Engagement Letter for Audit and Arbitrage Rebate Services for the Year Ending December 31, 1993--The City's auditing firm, Deloitte & Touche, has prepared an engagement letter to cover auditing and arbitrage rebate calculation services for the City for the year ending December 31, 1993. Current City policy covering the selection of an auditing firm requires a Request for Proposal process covering a three (3) year period with up to three (3) one year annual extensions, if approved by the City Council. The last three (3) year RFP covered the years ending December 31, 1989, 1990 and 1991. The proposal which is attached as pages through covers the second one (1) year extension. The proposal is consistent with previous services and is comparable to other cities of similar size and complexity. The proposed fee for auditing services (excluding arbitrage rebate calculations) for the year ending December 31, 1993 is $31,200. This compares favorably to the 1992 proposal of$30,000. The actual amount paid for 1992 was also $30,000. Staff is recommending acceptance of the proposal by the City Council. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve Deloitte & Touche as the independent auditors and providers of arbitrage rebate calculation services for the year ended December 31, 1993 per the terms of the engagement letter. 4 Deloifte & Touche 400 One Financial Plaza Telephone:(612)397-4000 120 South Sixth Street Facsimile:(612)397-4450 Minneapolis,Minnesota 55402-1844 November 12, 1993 The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council Eagan,Minnesota Dear Mayor and City Council Members: We are pleased to serve as independent accountants and auditors for the City of Eagan(the City). Mr.Jeff Radunz will be responsible for all services we perform for you. It will be the responsibility of Mr.Radunz to make sure that your management receives quality service. He will,as considered necessary,call upon other individuals with specialized knowledge,either in this office or elsewhere in our firm. He will be assisted by Ms.Beth Monsrud,Manager,in the performance of our services. While auditing and reporting on your annual general purpose financial statements is to be the recurring basic service we provide,we would also like to assist you on issues as they arise throughout the year. Hence,we hope that you will call Mr.Radunz whenever you feel he can be of assistance. Audit of General Purpose Financial Statements: The purpose of our engagement to audit the City's financial statements for the year ending December 31, 1993 is to evaluate the fairness of presentation of the statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles,in all material respects. Our audit will be conducted in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards and Government Auditing Standards,issued by the Comptroller General of the United States,which involves obtaining an understanding of the internal control structure,including the control environment,the accounting system,and the control procedures established by management. Based on our understanding,we will design our audit to provide reasonable assurance of detecting errors and irregularities that are material to the financial statements. However,because of the characteristics of irregularities,particularly those involving forgery and collusion,a properly designed and executed audit may not detect such items. Therefore,an audit conducted in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards is designed to obtain reasonable,rather than absolute,assurance about the general purpose financial statements. An audit includes examining,on a test basis,evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in DeloitteTouche Tohmatsu International The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council November 12, 1993 Page 2 • the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management,as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. The objective of our audit is the expression of an opinion on the City's general purpose financial statements. Our ability to express that opinion and the wording of our opinion will,of course, be dependent on the facts and circumstances at the date of our report. If our auditors'report requires modification,the reasons therefor will be discussed with you prior to its issuance. Managements Responsibility: We direct your attention to the fact that the financial statements are the responsibility of management. In this regard,management has the responsibility for designing effective internal controls, for properly recording transactions in the accounting records, for making appropriate accounting estimates,for safeguarding assets,and for the overall accuracy of the financial statements. Other Communications Arising from the Audi In connection with the planning and the performance of our audit,generally accepted auditing standards require that we communicate certain matters to the City Council. We will communicate to the City Council,to the extent that they come to our attention,irregularities and illegal acts that are clearly not inconsequential, and reportable conditions. Reportable conditions are significant deficiencies in the design or operation of the internal control structure that could adversely affect the City's ability to record,process,summarize, and report financial data consistent with the assertions of management in the general purpose financial statements. In addition,we will communicate to the City Council certain other matters related to the conduct of our audit,including,when applicable: • Significant accounting policies • Management judgments and accounting estimates • Significant audit adjustments(recorded and unrecorded) • Other information in documents containing audited financial statements • Disagreements with management 13 The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council November 12, 1993 Page 3 - • Consultation by management with other accountants on significant matters • Difficulties encountered in performing the audit • Major issues discussed with management prior to our retention as auditor We may also have other comments for management on matters we have observed and possible ways to improve the efficiency of your operations or other recommendations concerning the internal control structure. With respect to these other communications,it is our practice to discuss all comments,if appropriate,with the level of management responsible for the matters prior to their communication to the City Council. Audit Reports; In connection with our 1993 audit,we expect to issue the following reports: • Our report on the City's Comprehensive Annual Financial Report for the year ending December 31, 1993 • Independent Auditors'Report on Compliance • Management Letter(including Independent Auditors'Report on Internal Control) • Audit Communications Letter Audit Tuning: We plan to perform our interim field work in January 1994,and our final field work is scheduled to begin March 21, 1994. Final report drafts will be available for review with management in early May 1994. We expect to attend a City Council meeting in late May or early June 1994 to present the financial statements. Professional Fees: Our fees are based on the amount of time required at various levels of responsibility,plus actual out-of-pocket expenses(travel,typing,report production,etc.). • 1 $ The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council November 12, 1993 Page 4 • We estimate that our total fees for the audit, including management letter, compliance tests, and reporting thereon in accordance with the Minnesota Legal Compliance Audit Guide for Local Governments and presentation to the City Council, including out-of-pocket expenses and additional services anticipated for implementation of GASB Statement No. 14,will be$31,200. We have quoted rates for recurring audit services for which we can reasonably estimate the time required to render services. These estimates assume that we will receive a comparable level of audit support as in 1992. The above fee estimate does not include procedures associated with a single audit of federal program funds. It has currently been determined that such additional auditing procedures will not be necessary in 1993. However, if such procedures are necessary, an additional fees estimate will be provided based on the number of federal programs and the nature of such programs. Normally,such procedures encompass 35 to 40 hours of professional service time per federal program and would be expected to range in price from $2,000 to$3,000. It is our policy to request no additional fees for budget overruns unless such overruns are due to extensions of work requested by the City or because of circumstances not within our control. In these situations,we would discuss the condition with management prior to incurring any additional time. It is our desire to closely control audit time and fees. This is best accomplished by good communication with your personnel during the planning phase of the audit. This allows us to jointly determine requirements,assign tasks, and minimize overlapping and duplicative work. Tax Services: As requested, Deloitte&Touche will calculate the arbitrage rebate amount,if any,and will issue an arbitrage rebate report for the following bond issues with the following estimated fees: Bond Issue Estimate $13,400,000 General Obligation Improvement Bonds,Series 1988A $ 400 $9,325,000 General Obligation Improvement Bonds,Series 1989A (includes preparation and review of Form 8038-T for the rebate payment due at the end of the five-year computation period) 1,500 $5,250,000 General Obligation Improvement Bonds,Series 1990B 1,200 $5,460,000 General Obligation Improvement Bonds,Series 1992A 1,200 $3,540,000 General Obligation Improvement Bonds,Series 1992B 1,200 $325,000 General Obligation Equipment Certificate of Indebtedness, Series 1993A 400 • • The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council November 12, 1993 Page 5 • In addition,Deloitte&Touche will read the following bond issue documents to ensure that they are in compliance with the Escrow Account Investment Proceeds section of their respective Arbitrage Certificates and will issue a report for each issue with the following estimated fees: Bond Issue Estimate $1,220,000 General Obligation Refunding Improvement Bonds,Series 1990D $0-400 $3,290,000 General Obligation Improvement Refunding Bonds,Series 1991A 0-400 $2,440,000 General Obligation Park and Recreation Refunding Bonds, Series 1991B 0-400 $7,275,000 General Obligation Water Revenue Refunding Bonds,Series 1993B 0-400 $1,285,000 General Obligation Fire Facilities Refunding Bonds,Series 1993C 0-400 $950,000 General Obligation Improvement Refunding Bonds,Series 1993D 0-400 Our fees for tax services are based on our best estimate of the charges you will incur provided we receive complete information from you. Any research that may be required during the course of our engagement will be billed separately. You will be notified in advance if we think it is necessary to research an issue. Any additional charges will be billed at our usual standard rates. In addition,in connection with our audit of the City's 1993 financial statements,we will perform certain procedures(e.g.,inquiries)to ascertain that no significant changes on the arbitrage rebate status exists for the following bonds: • $1,850,000 General Obligation Facilities Bonds,Series 1988B • $290,000 General Obligation Equipment Certificates of Indebtedness Bonds,Series 1989B • $9,300,000 General Obligation Revenue Water System Bonds,Series 1990A • $250,000 General Obligation Equipment Certificates of Indebtedness,Series 1990C • $600,000 General Obligation Equipment Certificate of Indebtedness,Series 1991C • $400,000 General Obligation Equipment Certificate of Indebtedness,Series 1992C a + : • * � L 1 The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council November 12, 1993 Page 6 We appreciate the opportunity to continue to provide professional services to the City. If the above terms are acceptable to you and the services outlined are in accordance with your understanding,please sign the copy of this letter and return it to us. If you have any questions,please call Mr.Jeff Radunz at 397-4222. Yours truly, jeet)rts..._ Accepted on behalf of the City Council by: Signature Date I `� Agenda Information Memo December 21, 1993 City Council Meeting FINAL PLAT/TOWN CENTRE 100 12TH ADDITION F. Finn al Plat,Town Centre 100-Twelfth Addition(Mann Theaters)--Staff has been working diligently to complete the final details so that this plat for the Mann Theater can be approved before the end of 1993. We are in the process of finalizing the development agreement and securing a letter of intent on the financial guarantees. Planning and engineering review of the final plat documents has been completed. If the legal and financial instruments are completed and executed in time for Tuesday's meeting, this item will be in order for consideration by the City Council. If not, staff will recommend that it be continued at the time of agenda approval. For a copy of the final plat as it appears for recording at Dakota County, please refer to page 1 . ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the final plat for Town Centre 100 12th Addition as presented. IF I _* rr Allt I 401 I 1 . 1 I v I. li rilltpigtil itithiiitiiii illi i 1 1 11 ' 10111 " I iii I iill I 41 11 I I) . ii ply ti Ili 1, 1 ph k i iliiii L d'I 1 1 I 14 1 LI hi. ' ! it f !1! 11 1i . , , 1.11 e • • 1 F l I Z r 1,1A1 1Ii r . " I ' ' '>> = I1 j i i1 1 � j " ii 4I fI 1 ail; � 1 Ii �l i t• O 1 Ei + , It i Lit, ,i: t t t I a poi t jib 1 i 1 1� �� i s• a01 ! iiI 'V'i Om 1; , # � � � 1. : = lb a h f f' I1 . !; 1 oilli$ _ 1-- u. 11. ii nil f e SS g 4lli n .i P w J I.— W 4 I- - ii , h ' • i 1 0 -±" Q ;Ii ii !i ' liI, 1 s ;t �C o u 1itii11Ø1hifjti 1 . I i II i 1,11 Ph, Hi! 1 I 11;1 ., a 4 r I x;11 • • iIi i VI ,,Z � 1 w V ,.w � Z i .. � 1. . - _ _ 1 •118 Q 1, ? 'V i i it i s I ip • 1:fr I i-- lip JR=i Iii I g . • - i ; Ili i IN id d 1i ; I a I tilli . -- a - ' • Arid `0 i r -.....! - 51 I ill i vi el Agenda Information Memo December 21, 1993 City Council Meeting FINAL PLAT/L XINGTON MEADOWS G. Final Plat, Lexington Meadows--Final plat documents are in the process of being completed by staff and the applicant. If all items are completed and executed in time for Tuesday's meeting, this item will be in order for consideration by the City Council. If not, staff will recommend that it be pulled at the time of agenda adoption. For a copy of the final plat as it appears for filing at Dakota County, please refer to page At . ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve a final plat for the Lexington Meadows as presented. COO :::::AO! r IV 1.1 AbVINI'N I3tW ��:..}...' '� • yOJ �''�i :••• _•{Alga* �� i�N1 Ol butt • �►i: •••..:� •3•Isms `�/ SiIdxIV���I IIOI'jt11X3 .•q►~ A l at 1 1 � I 1 1 . - • , • • • 1 • ft • , �it'44t 4 • I z is• • W Z Q . �� 2 - a< &Q ..a w , �- 0 .•!- - r t • /11• • — ,.:.1 —a - ..0\s‘ ) 1 1 0 1 1 1--.7-1:7:::::;q:77:-....::- al . Agenda Information Memo December 21, 1993 City Council Meeting PETITION/SET PUBLIC HEARING/CEDARVALE AREA SPECIAL SERVICE DISTR CT H. Receive Petition/Schedule Public Hearing, Request for Cedarvale Area Special Service District Legislative Authorization--At its meeting of October 28, 1993, the Economic Development Commission considered the above-referenced item. The item had been previously discussed by the Commission in concept and had been reviewed with the Cedarvale area merchants and property owners by Gary Morgan in his capacity as Government Action Committee Chairman for the Eagan Chamber of Commerce. Based upon Mr. Morgan's discussions with those owners, a petition was circulated requesting the establishment of a special service district to provide: 1. Signage identifying the overall retail area; 2. Preparation, mowing, maintenance and repair of landscaping; 3. Lighting; 4. Parking facilities; 5. Public safety; 6. Maintenance, operation, repair and replacement of existing public improvements; 7. Other municipal services; and 8. Administration, coordination, studies and preparation of designs. A copy of the background information relative to this item is enclosed in the staff memorandum on pages can 4 through C�..�_ As noted in the memo, the owners felt it PP ro a riate to begin with inclusive list of services with the understanding that subsequent appropriate will be held on an annual work plan and budget which will define the specific services and costs to be implemented. To adopt the special service district, Council must receive a petition from owners representing more that 25% of the affected property valuation or square footage. At the present time, staff is in receipt of petitions from owners of property totaling $6,619,200 of the $13,429,700 of value in the area. This is approximately 50% of the value and approximately the same amount of the square footage. Mr. Morgan expects additional petitions to be received before next Tuesday's meeting. A list of affected properties with those petitioning noted is enclosed on pageL Upon receipt of the petition, the Council may schedule a public hearing to consider a request of authorization for the district for the services identified at the next legislative session. The 1994 Legislature will convene on February 22. Therefore,the public hearing should be scheduled no later than the February 15, 1994 City Council meeting. To permit a continuation as necessary, staff is recommending that the Council set the public hearing for its meeting of February 1, 1994. If the Council is predisposed to adopt the special service district at the close of the public hearing, it will forward a resolution to the Legislature requesting special legislation. If that legislation is adopted, Council may then take action to adopt the ordinance forming a Agenda Information Memo December 21, 1993 City Council Meeting district. The affected date of the ordinance will be at least 45 days following the adoption by the City Council. If within that time, the City receives a valid petition from owners of 35% of the land area or 35% of the tax capacity within the affected area, the ordinance does not become effective. If no such petition is received, the district is implemented and the City may establish a final budget and set a hearing date to implement the special service district. For a copy of ille.iminutes of.the EDC meeting of October 28 relative to this item, please refer to pages 9 through ., (4, As you will note, the Commission is recommending that the City Council set a public hearing as provided for by statute on the basis of the receipt of petitions from more than half of the property in the area. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To accept the EDC recommendation, receive a petition and schedule a public hearing for January 18, 1994 for the Cedarvale area special service district legislative authorization. rwi � _city of eagan • MEMO MEMO TO: CHAIR JOHNSON AND ALL MEMBERS OF THE EAGAN ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR REICHERT FROM: ASSISTANT TO THE CITY ADMINISTRATOR HOHENSTEIN DATE: DECEMBER 8, 1993 SUBJECT: CEDARVALE SPECIAL SERVICE DISTRICT SUPPORT INFORMATION At its meeting of October 28, 1993, the Economic Development Commission requested additional information including a budget for the potential Cedarvale special service district. Gary Morgan, as chair of the Chamber of Commerce Government Action Committee, prepared the draft budget and tax estimate which is attached as Appendix A for your review. The spreadsheet assumes a pylon sign at $30,000 and two ground monument signs at$10,000 each. It also anticipates additional mowing in the amount of $3,000 annually and sign maintenance increasing from$2,000 to$3,000 over the term of this estimate. These estimates were shared with Cedarvale property owners at.an area wide meeting on December 1, 1993. One of the next steps will be for the area to retain a sign consultant to determine an overall sign plan including the height and size necessary for the pylon sign to be effective. This may result in the modification of the draft budget, depending upon whether sufficient funds had been identified for this purpose. This additional information will be gathered in the coming months. However, as noted in the special service district legislation which is also attached as Appendix B, the establishment of the special service district and the implementation of service charges within it occur in two separate actions. The first is the identification of the types of services anticipated for the district which culminates in a request to the legislature for authorization to form the district with those powers. The second element is a public notice and public hearing process concerning the work plan and budget for the district which occurs once the district is formed. On the basis of this two step process, Mr. Morgan, in consultation with City staff, prepared the petition form attached as Appendix C. At the present time, Mr. Morgan and other Cedarvale business people are collecting signatures which they hope to present to the City Council at its meeting of December 21. In order to begin the process of requesting legislative authorization for the district, a petition must be received from • CEDARVALE DECEMBER 8, 1993 PAGE 2 property owners representing 25% of the market value and 25% of the square footage within the Cedarvale area. It was anticipated that several large property owners may be able to exceed these percentages by themselves. Regardless, the Cedarvale business owners are attempting to amass as many signatures as possible to show support for the concept and to anticipate any opposition which may come from other property owners. This is important since a petition from owners representing 35% of the market value or square footage can overturn the City's ordinance if received within 45 days of Council action following legislative authorization. Based on examples received from the city of Apple Valley, staff has drafted the necessary documentation for formation of a special service district in the Cedarvale retail area which is attached as Appendix D. Those documents are also attached and include: 1. A resolution requesting special service district legislation. 2. Proposed enabling legislation identifying the area and services to be provided. 3. A resolution accepting the powers to establish the special service district which would effectively adopt the authority received from the legislature. 4. A proposed ordinance reflecting those same services. Once this authorization is received, the City may prepare the detailed work plan and budget and hold the second public hearing to establish the actual service rate for the area. The current scheduled laid out before the Economic Development Commission at its October meeting, anticipated that a recommendation would come from the commission concerning this item in time for a public hearing before the City Council to be held at its meeting of January 18, 1993. If approved, this would permit the Council to forward its recommendation to the legislature in time for the beginning of the legislative session in February. Depending upon the commission's meeting schedule, it may or may not meet before the January Council meeting at which the public hearing would be held. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED BY THE COMMISSION: To approve or deny a recommendation to the Eagan City Council concerning the establishment of a special service district in the Cedarvale retail area to have the powers outlined in the petition prepared by the area or as modified following commission discussions. At its meeting CEDARVALE DECEMBER 8, 1993 PAGE 3 of October 28, the commission reviewed other alternatives including private association and a do-nothing alternative that were not supported at that time. Staff will be present at Thursday's meeting to respond to any questions concerning this item. istant to the City Administrator Attachments JDH/jeh Ei8 ZO0d Malt:60 E6-LO-ZI I106EEE X963 APPENDIX A CEDARVALE SPECIAL SERVICE DISTRICT SAMPLE BUDGET ESTIMATED COST SIGN INTEREST 6.00% 81GNAGE 50.00 1994 1999 SIGN TERM 5.00 years MOWING 0.00 13.586.80 0.00 MOWING MGNTANf� 3`000.00 3,000.00 3,000.00 2,000.00 2,00040 8,000.00 18,586'80 8,000.00 ANT PER 1000 0.00138 0;00046 1994 1999 1993 LAND 1993 BLDG 1993 TOTAL SOD TAX SOD TAX U-Hall 10-01900-010-03 70,500.00 43,000.00 113,500.00 156.68 50.57 Sherwin Williams 10-13700-02001 100,000.00 181,200.00.00 482,100.00 325.14 12 .70 M Transmission 10-1 1,200.00 282.600.00 389,38 125.70 Meeotrerranean Chile* 10-13700-050.-01 10,900.00 85,900.00 194,800.00 206.88 8620 Old Domhoe 10-13700-08001 41,200,00 48,800.00 150,000.00 90,000.00 12423 40.10 Old sawn Auto 10-13700-070-01 53,700.00 151,300.00 205,000.00 282.96 91.34 HHousea of 10-01900-100-08 78,400.00 96,700.00 174,100.00 240.31 77.57 Sin Hardware 10-o1900--001008 152,400.00 34,900.00 187,300.00 258.53 83.46 Ace _ ,500.00 96,900.00 134,400.00 185.51 59.89 Old Pius 00-01900-040-08 47,900.00 83,000.00 110,900.00 153.08 49.41 Sara Self Self Landry 1001900-060-.08 ,x.00 86,900.00 131..400.00 181.37 58.55 25,900.00 34,100.00 60,000.00 82.82 25.73 Valley Bike and Ski 10-01900-080-06 55,500.00 111,900.00 167,400.00 231.08 74.59 10-01900-070-08 74,100.00 147,800.00 221,700.00 306.01 98.78 Colonial Pride Car Wash 10-01900-090-08 58,800.00 57,900.00 116,700.00 161.08 62.00 lancer Koltlege 10-01900-020-07 88,200.00 148,000.00 236,200.00 323.03 105.25 AWR 10-01900-090-06 64,700.00 154,200.00 218,900.00 302.15 97.54 Sick Kid Kare 10-01900011-07 17,400.00 155,200.00 172,600.00 238.24 76.91 Oedemale Mall 10-01900-061-06 1,007,300.00 1.192,700.00 2,200,00000 3,036.67 980,27 Flat Star Bank 1001900-010-08 214,300.00 235,700.00 450,000.00 621.14 200.51 Cedarvale off--Med 10-16850-031-01 101,900.00 18,800.00 120,700.00 166.80 5378 Ced Off vac 10-16850-040-01 Cod Off Vac 10-16850050-01 4,300.00 4,200.00 5.80 1.87 Ced Off Et 4300.00 4,300.00 5.94 1.92 Ellingson 10-16850-081-01 58000.00 12,100.00 68,10040 94.00 30.34 Ced Off Dakota Realtors 10-16850-08001 7,200.00 7,20000 9.94 3.21 Ced Off Pe o/Dental 10-16850-122-01 52,700.00 10,300.00 63,00000 86.96 28.07 Cad Off Trans ht 10-18650-123-01 76,100.00 12,600.00 88,700.00 122.43 39.52 Norwest Bank 10-16901-040-01 64,000.00 519,100.00 583,100.00 804.86 259.82 Perkins 10-16901-030-01 117,500.00 228,900.00 346,400,00 478.14 154.35 Texaco(old Rex) 10-18901-020-01 121,600.00 110,700.00 232,300.00 320.65 103.51 age6 indoor 10-01900-050-04 105,000.00 242,400.00 347,400.00 479.52 154.79 10-01900-020-04 88,600.00 103,400.00 192,000.00 265.02 85.55 Express Donuts 10-01900-010-04 90,000.00 71,400.00 161,400.00 ?22.78 71.82 Twin City Poultry 10-01900-030-04 75,800.00 212,500.00 238,300.00 397.94 128.46 Cedavaie Lanes 10-18901-010-01 289,200.00 903,400.00 1,172,600.00 1,618.55 522.48 SIMet Bell Center 10-68100-0�01 57 500.00 ��� 4'��•00 58028 18732 MEI 10-13520-020-01 51,300.00 106,x. 1,258,100.00 1,21823 7045 Copiers/Fax 10-13520010-01 600.0 158,100.00 21823 49.86 �� 43,600.00 111;800.00 154.46 49.86 instant Testing 1001900-020-12 74.900.00 70,200.00 145,100.00 20028 64.85 Pet Clinic 1001900-030-12 77,000.00 131,000.00 238,000.00 287.10 92.88 OfeasawGym 1001900-011-11 380,000.00 83,700.00 . 443,700.00 612.44 197.70 D.P.Photo/Lumber 10-01900-012-11 87,100.00 47,300.00 134,400.00 185.51 59.69 BCet male Highlands 10 01900-010-10 73,00000 542,500.00 615,500.00 849.58 274.25 �y Hagen,CPA 58,800.00 51x.000 0 110,00.000 0 151.83 49.01 TOTAL 5,366,000.00 8,099,700.00 13,485,700.00 18,586.80 6,000.00 These we only estimates of costs. The final numbers will be based on the final sign plan and budget approved by you at a Public Hearing. Values are assumed correct,please notify GarY (333-1413)with any changes. Z`8 39Wd ' If7,1 CCFf{ �ar,r�r+� wL..• ..+ ..,... .� • 12/86/93 22:48 3339841 MASS 'M AL PAGE 83 CEDARVALE SPECIAL SERVICE DISTRICT SAMPLE BUDGET ESTIMATED COST • . SIGN"INTEREST 6.0096 SIGNAGE 50,000.00 8,718.46 2004 SIGN TERM 10.00 years 3,000.00 3,003.00 SIGN MOWING MAINTNNCE 2,000.00 2,000.00 3,000.00 3,03000 ASSESMENT PER 1000 13,718.46 6,000.00 0.00102 0.00045 • 1994 1993 LAND 1993 BLDG 1993 TOTAL ODD TAX ODD TAX U-Haut 10-01900-010-03 43,000.00 113,500.00 115.63 Superior Collision 10-13700-010-01 110,500.00 01.50 Sherwin Marna 10-13700-020-01 100,900.00 181,20000 282,100.00 461.40 20260 Motec� 10-13700-040-01 108,900.00 S5 166!80 Mediterranean Cruise 10-13700-050-01 ,x.00 1 .00 152.82 86.84 Old Dominos 10-13700-060-01 x•500.00 64,500.00 150,000.00 152.82 88.84 41 Old Crown Auto 10-10-13700-070--01 01 0.00 48,800.00 90,000.00 91.69 40.10 House f r3,Wing 10-01900-100-06 63,700.00 195,300.00 374,100.00 177.37 71.37 _ �,�,� 95,700.00 �7a,too.00 177.37 77,57 Sin Hardware 10-01900-010-08 152,400.00 34,900.00 187,300.00 190.82 83.46 1 's 10-01900-030-08 X500.00 98,900,00 134,400.00 136.92 68.89 Old Pizza Nut 10--01900-040-08 47,900.00 631000.00 110,900.00 112.98 49.41 X Sara Sell Self Laundry 10-01900-050-06 500.00 88,900.00 131,400.00 133.87 58.55 Valley Bike and Ski 10-01900-080-08 55,500.00 111,900.00 167,400.00 170.54 74,59 Goodyear 10-01900-070-08 74,100.00 147,800.00 221, Colonial Pride Car Wash 10-01900-090-08 58,800.00 700.00 118.89 98.78 Kinder 10-01900-020-07 57,900.00 116,700.00 118.89 52.00 Kinder 10-01900-060-06 64.70300� 148,000.00 236,200.00 240.63 105.25 Sick IQd Kara 10-01900-Ot t-07 17 154.200.00 218,900.00 223.01 97.54 Oedarvale Mall 10-01900-051-06 t 007 400.00 155,200.00 172,600.00 175.84 76.91 First Star Bank 10-01900-010-08 214 300.00 1,192,700.00 2 450,000.00 2,241.29 200,5 Cedarvale 3,N--Mad 10-16850-031-01 235,700.00 450,000.00 458.45 200.51 Ced Off vac 10-16850-040-01 .101,900.00 18$00.00 120,700.00 122.97 53.78 Cad Off Vac 10-16850-050-0i 4,300.00 4,200.00 4.28 1.92 Cad Off Ellingson 10-16850-081-01 56,000.00 12,100.00 4,300.00 4.38 0.34 Ced Off Dakota Realtors 10-16850-090-01 7,200.00 68,100.00 67.34 30.34 Ced Off ParrantolDental 10-16850-122-01 52,700.00 10,300.00 63,000.00 64.18 3.21 Ced Off Trans hit 10-1850-123-01 76,100.00 12,600.00 88 700.00 90.36 39.02 NoiwestBa>k 10-16901-040-01 64,00000 519,100.00 583,100.00 594.04 59.82 Perkins 10-16901-000-01 117,500.00 22 154.32 Texaco(old Aar) 10-16901-020-01 121,800.00 110,703.00 232,300.00 296.66 103.51 StatballIndoor 10-01900-060-04 105,000.00 232,300.00 353.92 103.51 Arians 10-ol9ao-333-33, 242,400.00 347,400.00 353.92 153,.79 Donuts 10-01900-020-04 88,600.00 103,400.00 192,000.00 195.60 85.55 Twin Express outs 10-01900-Op0-04 9020020 71,400.00 161,400.00 164.43 71.92 'Win Cale Lanes 10-18901-010-01 59,800.00 212,500.00 288,300.00 293.71 128.46 Mc oonatds 10-01700-.020-54 '�'� 903.400.00 1.172,600.00 1,194.61 �,.�g Mc D Bel Center 139,900.00 280,500.00 420,400.00 4,28.29 187.32 10-88100-010-01 572,500.00 . 627,500.00 1.200,000.00 1,222,52 534.69 MEI 10-13520-020-01 51,300.00 106,800.00 158,100.00 161.07 Copiers/Fax 10-13520-010-01 68,300.00 43,600.00 111,900.00 70.45 Pet Clinic 10-01900-020-12 74,900.00 70,200.00 100.00 147.82 49.86 10-01903-030-12 77 0 108,000.00 11.90 64.65 ��Gym 10-01900-011-11 �'1D00'00 1st,00000 zog.aoo.00 2i t.90 92.68 D.P.Ptah/Lumber 10-01900-012-11 87,100.00 47,300.00 134,400.00 136.92 197.70 Cedarvale Highlands 10-01900-010-10 73,000.00 542,500.00 615, 136.92 74.25 Big Top 10-01900-020-10 48,700.00 12d 000.00 627.05 275.30 Larry Naugen,CPA 120,300.00 169,000.00 . 172.17 75.30 110,000.00 112.06 49.01 These are only estimates d TOTAL 5,307,200.00 8,048,500.00 13,465,700.00 13,718.46 6,000.00 M costs. The final numbers will be based on the final sign plan and bud Pubic Hearing. Values are assumed correct,piece nosy Gary Morgan(�- with any chance d at a =-961r 3339041 12-07-93 09i11P3i P003 lr13 . r 12/06/93 22:40 3339041 MASS MUTUAL F1ASE 84 �*gA4\ EABAN OF COMMERCE ` A dlv ton oleo Northern t1 Canty 1 Chombe s of Canrn� • �► - 1501 CORPORATE CB4TER CR. 1115 EAOMI, W156121-1259 �,,lo' p312)4524 872 •FAX:012)4524178 December 3, 1994 Dan Sjoiseth Superior Collision & Paint 3985 Cedarview Drive Eagan, MN 55122 . Dear Dan: • As you may Imow, the Eagan Chamber of Commerce has been organizing and facilitating meetings for the benefit of the Cedaivale area land owners and merchants. We have worked hard to revitalize the area including roadway improvement feasibility studies, additional mowing, elimination of weed trees, new street lights and an overall sign plan. We have been working very well with the full cooperation of city staff in a public/private partnership. This brings me to the next point of action. In working with the aty's Economic Development Commission, city staff,and area merchants,it has been decided that a special service district should be established to further help the area. The district will provide the funding authority to pay for mowing, overall signage, landscaping and maintenance of these items. We also have left the description broad enough so we don't have to go back • to the legislature for approval is the area needs change. There is a sample initial budget attached to provide an idea what the cost could be Hopefully the person that presented this petition and letter to you can answer any questions you may have . an that as owner of the property you will sign this petition and return it by December 15th. If not, please • . feel free to call me as I have been involved with this since it's beginning. Sincerely, • • Gary Morgan, ern, CbFC Phone Number. 333-1413 Government Action Chairman • ORM/Ic • nccseoutaa 1■95% 3339041 a, 12-07-93 09:4IPhn Pena 1513 APPENDIX B SPECIAL SER%7CE DISTRICT PROCEDURES 425A.02 • , CHAPTER 428A •SPECIAL SERVICE DISTRICT PROCEDURES own s0aeia semis disks pecefrest 4211&Os send: • QUIP Advisory beard 4244.02 Establishment of speninl orris district. 4214.04 Minion require!. 42IA.03 Service�uirsree�•metier zed 42K09 Vow Rover ofowera 4ri4.0r Wallowa(of amid eerierdistricts. 12aAL10 Eadnsie.ryes ratitieo,pe1,a„d,� • 4284.0$ Crawler etsstvier asps act neap revs ' 428(01 SPECIAL,SERVICE DISTRICT PROCEDURES;DEFINITIONS Subdivision 1. Applicability. As used in sections 428A.01 to 4284..10,the terms •• defined in this section have the meanings given them. Snbd. 2. tit. "(Sty"means the city in which the special service district is authorized to be established under a special law. Subd. 3. Special services. enabling legislation. "Special services"has the meaning given in the city's . " Special services do not include a service that is ordinarily provided throughout the sty from general fund revenues of the city unless an increased level of the service is • provided in the special service district. Snbd. 4. Special service district. `Special service district"means a defined within the city where special services are rendered and the costs of the special service are paid from revenues collected from service charges imposed within that area. Subd. S. Grass tax capacity. "Gross tax capacity"means the gloss tax capacity most recently certified by the county auditor before the effective date of the ordinance • or resolution adopted under section 4284..02 or 428A.03. Subd. 6. land area."Land area"means the land area in the district that is subject to property taxes Illetory: a 719 art S s dl;art Js s 1 4284.02 EST ABLZSHMENT OF SPECIAL,SERVICE DISTRICT. • Subdivision 1. Ordinance. The governing body of the city may adopt an ordinance establishing � . fishing a special service district. Only property that is classified under section 273.13 and used for commercial, industrial,or public utility vacant land zoned or designated on a land use plan for commercial orpindustrial use and located in the special service district,maybe subject to the charges imposed by the city on the special service district. Other types of property may be included within the boundaries of the special service district but are not subject to the levies or charges imposed by the city on the special service district. If SO pe • Value ofa parcel ofproperty is classified under section 273 percent ass cco�ro ci the dusts market al,or vacant land zoned or designated on a land use plan for commercial industrial use,or public utility for the current assessment year,then the entirt;mark the property is subject to a service charge based on value of sections 428A.01 to 4284..10. The ordinance shall describe itcapacity ula purposes of within the city to be included in the district and the Pad the area • the district. The ordinance may not be adopted until special a publclic to be furnished hearing has been • held on the question. Notice of the bearing shall include the time and place of hearing, *Map showing the boundaries of the proposed district,and a statement that ill persons owning property.in the proposed district that would be subject to a service charge will be riven opportunity to be heard at the hearing. Subd. 2. Notice. Notice of the bearing must be given by publication in at least t"'o moues of the official newspaper of the city.The two publications must be two weirs I apart and the hearing must be held at least three days after the last publication. Not i • (.3 D • 4211A32 SPECIAL,SERVICE DISTRICT PROCEDURES rig • less than ten days before the hearing,notice must also be mailed to the owner of each Parcel within the area proposed to be included in the district. For the purpose ofgiving i mailed notice,owners are those shown on the records of the county auditor. Other records may be used to supply the necessary information. For properties that are tax exempt or subject to taxation on a gross earnings basis in lieu of property tax and are not listed on the records of the county auditor,the owners must be ascertained by any practicable means and mailed notice given them. At the public bearing a person affected by the proposed district may testify on any issues relevant to the district. The hearing may be adjourned from time to time and the ordinance establish- ing the district may be adopted at any time within six months after the date of the conclusion of the bearing by a vote of the majority of the governing body of the city. Subd. 3. Charges relationship to services. The city may impose service charges under sections 428A.01 to 428A.10 that are reasonably related to the special services provided. (barges for service shall be as nearly as possible of furnishing the service, Proportionate to the cost i rag ce,and may be fixed on the basis of the service directly rendered, or by reference to a reasonable classification of the types of premises to which service is furnished,or on any other equitable basis. Subd. 4. Besefit objection. &fore the ordinance is adopted or at the bearing at which it is to be adopted,any affected landowner may file a written objection with the city clerk asserting that the landowner's property should not be included in the district or should not be subjected to a service charge and objecting to: (I) the inclusion of the landowner's property in the district,for the reason that the • property would not receive services that are not provided throughout the city to the same degree; • (2) the levy of a service charge on the landowner's property,for the reason that the property is exempted under sections 428A.01 to 428A.I0 or the special law under which the district was crated;or (3) the fact that neither the landowner's property nor its use Is benefited by the prop0Sed special service. The governing body shall make a determination on the objection within 30 days of its filing. Pending its determination, the governing body may delay adoption of the ordinance or it may adopt the ordinance with a reservation that the landowner's property may be excluded front the district or district service charges when the determination is made. Subd. S. Appeal to district court. Within 30 days after the determination of the objection,any person aggrieved,who is not precluded by failure to object before or at the bearing,or whose failure to object is due to a reasonable cause,may appeal to the district court by serving a notice upon the mayor or city clerk. The notice shall be filed with the court administrator of the district court within ten days after its service. The city derk shall furnish the appellant a certified copy of the findings and determination of the governing body. The court may affirm the action objected to or,if the appellant's objections have merit,modify or cancel it.If the appellant does not prevail upon the appeal, the costs incurred shall be taxed to the appellant by the court and judgment entered for them. All objections shall be deemed waived unless presented on appeal. • History:1988 c 719 art 5 s 84;art 14 x 2 428A.03 SERVICE CHARGE AUTHORITY;NOTICE AND HEARING REQUIRE' MENTS. Subdivision 1. Hearing. Service charges may be imposed by the city within the special service district at a rate or amount sufficient to produce the revenues requir'e° to provide special services in the district. To determine the appropriate rate for a service charge based on gross tax capacity,taxable property or gross tax capacity must be determined without regard to captured or original gross tax capacity under section 469.177 or to the distribution or contribution value under section 473F.08.Sergi charges may not be imposed to finance a special service if the service is ondinaril• 3 � • Pig SPECIAL SERSYCE DISTRICT i PROCEDURES � provided by the city from its general fund revenues unless the service is provided in • the district at an increased level. In that case,a service charge may be imposed only in the amount needed to pay for the increased level of service. A service charge may not be imposed on the receipts from the sale of intoxicating liquor,food,or lodging. Before the imposition of service charges in a district,for each calendar year,a hearing . most be held under section 428A.02 and notice must be given and must be mailed to • any individual or business organization subject to a service charge. For purposes of 1 this section,the notice shall also include: (I) a statement that all interested persons will be given an opportunity to be hard St the hearing regarding a proposed service charge; -r-- (2) the estimated cost of improvements to be paid for in whole or in n w titarges imposed under this section,the estimated cost of by the improvements during the first year and upon operating and emnt te proposed method and source of pen completion of the improvements,the operating and maintaining the improvements,and the annual cost of tng the improvements; (3) the proposed rate or amount of the proposed service charge to be imposed in the district during the calendar year and the nature and character of special services to be rendered the district during the calendar year in which the service charge is to (4) a statement that the petition requirements fsection 428A.08 have either been met or do not apply to the proposed service • Within six months of the public bearing,the city may adopt a resolution imposing a service charge within the district not exceeding the amount or rate expressed in the notice issued under this section. • Subd. 2. Exemption of certain properties from taxes and service charges. Property exempt from taxation by section 272.02 is exempt from any service charges based on gross tax capacity imposed under sections 428A.01 to 428A.10. Subd. 3. Lim llmtt. Service charges imposed under sections 428A.01 to 428A.10 are not included in the calculation of levies or limits on levies imposed under law or -charter. History:1988 c 719 art 5 s 84;art 14 s 3 428A-04 ENLARGEMENT OF SPECIAL SERVICE DLSTRIC'IS. Boundaries of a special service district may be enlarged only after hearing and notice as provided in sections 428A.02 and 428A.03. Notice must be served in the original district and in the area proposed to be added to the district. Property added to the district is subject to all service charges imposed within the district after the property becomes a part of the district if it is property of the type that is subject to service charges in the district. On the question of erJargement, the petition require- ment in section 428A.08 and the veto power in section 428A.09 apply only to owners, • individuals,and business organizations in the area proposed to be added to the district. History:1988c719 art!4s4 428A,05 COLLECTION OF SERVICE CHARGES. ServiQe charges may be imposed on the basis of the gross tax Property on which the service charge is imposed capacity of the i capacity of the taxable property Q0�but must be spread only upon the gross P petty loated in the ordinaaee.Service geographic area described in the at the charges based on gross tax capacity may be payable and collected same time and in the same manner as provided for ad valorem taxes. Other service payment and collection y charges imposed must be collected as provided by �tnance. Service charges based on gross tax capacity collected under sections X1.01 to 428A-10 are not included in computations under section 469.177,chapter 473p,or any other law that applies to general ad valorem levies. History:1988c719artSs84;art!4sS i ^1 3 .... 42M.06 SPECIALSERVICE DISTRICT PROCEDURES luSp 428A.06 BONDS. • • • At any time after a contract for the construction of all or part of an improvement authorized under sections 428A.0I to 428A.10 has been entered into or the work has been ordered done by day labor,the governing body of the city may issue obligations in the amount it deems necessary to defray in whole or in part the expense incurred and estimated to be incurred in making the improvement,induding every item of cost from inception to completion and all fees and expenses incurred in connection with the improvement or the financing. The obligations are payable primarily out of the proceeds of the service charge based on gross tax capacity imposed under section 428A.03, or from any other special assessments or nontax revenues available to be " pledged for their payment under charter or statutory authority,or from two or more of those sources.The governing body may,by resolution adopted prior to the sale of obligations,pledge the full faith,credit,and taxing power of the city to assure payment of the principal and interest if the proceeds of the service insufficient to pay the principal age in the district are • - accordance with chapter tin ex and interest. The obligations must be issued in • P except that an election is not required,and the amount 1 of the obligations need not be included in determining the net debt of the city under I the provisions of any law or charter limiting debt. History:1988 a 719art S s 84;art 14 s 6 428A.07 ADVISORY BOARD. • The governing body of the city may create and appoint an advisory board for each special service district in the city to advise the governing body in connection with the construction, maintenance, and operation of improvements, and the furnishing of special services in a district. The advisory board shall make recommendations to the governing body on the requests and complaints of owners,occupants,and users of property within the district and members of the public. Before the adoption of any proposal by the governing body to provide services or impose service charges within the district,the advisory board of the district shall have an opportunity to review and comment upon the proposal. History:1988 a 719 art 14 s 7 428A.08 PETITION REQUIRED. No action may be taken under section 428A.02 unless owners of 25 percent or •• • more of the land area of property that would be subject to service charges in the proposed special service district and owners of 25 percent or more of the gross tax capacity of property that would be subject to service charges in the proposed special service district file a petition requesting a public hearing on the proposed action with the city clerk. No action may be taken under section 428A.03 to impose a service charge based on gross tax capacity unless owners of 25 percent or more of the land area subject to a proposed service charge and owners of 25 percent or more of the gross tax capacity subject to a proposed service charge file a on the proposed action with the city derk No action omaaygbe ken public der section 428A.03 to impose any other type of service charge unless 25 percent or more of the individual or business organizations subject to the proposed service charge file a petition i^equesting a public hearing on the proposed action with the city clerk. If the boundaries of a proposed district are changed or the Land area or gross tax capacity subject to a service charge or the individuals or business organizations subject to s • service charge are changed after the public hearing,a petition meeting the requirements of this section must be filed with the city derk before the ordinance establishing the district or resolution imposing the service charge may become effective. History: 1988c719 art Ss8t;art,4s8 428A.09 VETO POWER OF OWNERS. Subdivision 1. Notice of tight to file objections. Except as provided in section • 33 • • iol SPECIALSER% CE DISTRICT PROCEDURES 4284.10 • a a.10. the effective date of any ordinance or resolution adopted under sections a_Sa.02 and 428A.03 must be at least 45 days after it is adopted. Within five days after adoption of the ordinance or resolution,a summary attic ordinance or resolution must tic mailed to the owner of each parcel included in the special service district and any Individual or business organization subject to a service charge in the same manner that notice is mailed under section 42$A.02.The mailing must include a notice that owners subject to a service charge based on puss tax capacity and individuals and business • organizations subject to a service charge imposed on another basis have a right to veto • the ordinance or resolution by filing the required number of objections with the city clerk before the effective date of the ordinance or resolution and that a copy of the ordinance or resolution is on file with the city Berk for public inspection. 4% Subd. 2. Requirements for veto. Ifowners of 35 percent or more of the land area in the district subject to the service charge based on gross tax capacity or owners of 35 percent or more of the gross tax capacity in the district subject to the service charge based on gross tax capacity file an objection to the ordinance adopted by the city under section 428A.02 with the city desk before the effective date of the ordinance, the ordinance does not become effective. If owners of 35 percent or more of the land area object to the service charge based on gross tax capacity orowners of 35 percent or more of the gross tax capacity subject to the service charge based on gross tax capacity file an objection to the resolution adopted imposing a service charge based on gross tax capacity under section 428A.03 with the city derk before the effective date of the resolution,the resolution does not become effective. 1.115 perccent or more of individu- als and business organizations subject to a service charge file an objection to the resolution adopted imposing a service charge on a basis other than gross tax capacity _ under section 428A.03 with the city clerk before the effective date of the resolution,the resolution does not become effective. In the event of a veto, no district shall be established during the current calendar year and until a petition meeting the qualifiat- •- ions set forth in this subdivision for a veto has been filed. History:1988a719 art 5ad4;err 11s9 428A.I0 EXCLUSION FROM PETITION REQUIREMENTS AND VETO POWER. The petition requirements of se tiion 428A.08 and the right of owners and those subject to a service charge to veto a resolution in section 428A.09 do not apply to second or subsequent years'applications of a service charge that is authorized to be in . . . effect for more than one year under a resolution that has met the petition requirements of section 428A.08 and which has not been vetoed under section 428A.09 for the first year's application. A resolution imposing a service charge for more than one year must not be adopted unless the notice ofpublic hearing required by section 42$A.03 and the notice mailed with the adopted resolution under section 428A.09 include the following information: (1) in the case Of improvements,the maximum service charge to be imposed in any year and the maximum number of years the service charges imposed to pay for the improvement;and (2) in the case ofoperating and maintenance services,the maximum service charge to be'm1rosediih any year and the maximum number of years,or a statement that the service charge will be imposed for an indefinite number of years,the service charges wdI be imposed to pay for operation and maintenance services. The resolution may provide that the maximum service charge to be imposed in any year will increase or decrease from the maximum amount authorized in the preceding • Year based on an indicator of increased cost or a percentage amount established by the resolution. History:1988 c 719 art 14s 10 • • 3 APPENDIX C FOR CiTY USE ONLY Petition # Date Received Presented to Council PETITION LOCATION/SUBDIVISION i/We, the undersigned, owners of the real property within the Cedarvale Retail Area, hereby petition: To establish a Special Service District in the Cedarvale Area to promote it as a trade and shopping area with the ability to provide the following special services within the boundaries of the district to be rendered or contracted for by the City: 1. Signage Identifying the Overall Retail Area 2. Preparation, Mowing, Maintenance and Repair of Landscaping 3. Lighting 4. Parking Facilities 5. Public Safety 6. Maintenance, Operation, Repair and Replacement of Existing Public Improvements 7. Other Municipal Services 8. Administration, Coordination, Studies and Preparation of Designs 1/We understand that this petition does not in itself request the installation of these improvements or provision of these services. It represents my/our interest in the City requesting the statutory authority to provide such services. I/We understand that upon receipt of this petition, a public hearing will be held at which time we may voice our positions with respect to the establishment of the Special Service District. We further understand that pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, a detailed study of costs will be prepared and a public hearing will be held prior to the imposition of any charges for the improvements and services and that an annual public hearing on the budget for the coming year's workplan will afford the opportunity to address the proposed costs. Signature of Land Owner Address of Property 1. 2. • C c APPENDIX D CITY OF EAGAN RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION REQUESTING SPECIAL SERVICE DISTRICT LEGISLATION WHEREAS, the City of Eagan is a statutory city operating under the laws of the State of Minnesota, and WHEREAS,Minnesota Statutes Chapter 428A specifies special service district procedures which a city may enact through special legislation, and WHEREAS, special service districts are a defined area within the city where special services are rendered and the costs of the special services are paid from revenues collected from service charges imposed within that area, and WHEREAS, the City of Eagan has reached a stage in its development where the use of special service districts would facilitate redevelopment in and more equitably fund the increased level of services to be provided for certain areas of the City. NOW,THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Eagan, Dakota County, Minnesota, that it does hereby request its legislators to introduce and sponsor the necessary enabling legislation that will allow the creation of the districts under Minnesota Statutes Chapter 428A. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that certified copies of this resolution be sent to Senator Weiner and Representatives Pawlenty and Commers. CITY OF EAGAN CITY COUNCIL By: Its Mayor Attest: Its Clerk Motion made by: Seconded by: Those in favor: Those against: Dated: • (40 CERTIFICATION I, EJ.VanOverbeke, Clerk of the City of Eagan,Dakota County, Minnesota, do hereby certify that the foregoing proclamation was duly passed and adopted by the City Council of the City of Eagan, Dakota County, Minnesota, in a regular meeting thereof assembled this day of , 1994. EJ. VanOverbeke, City Clerk City of Eagan • • • PROPOSED BILL PROVIDE EAGAN LEGISLATION ENABLING FOR EAGAN SPECIAL SERVICE DISTRICT#1 Section 1. DEFINITIONS Subd. 1. For the purposes of Sections 1 and 2, the terms defined in this section have the meanings given them. - Subd. 2. "City" means the City of Eagan. Subd. 3. "Special services"means: 1. The promotion and management of a special service district as a trade or shopping area with the ability to provide the following special services within the boundaries of the district to be rendered or contracted for by the City. 2. Signage Identifying the Overall Retail Area 3. Preparation, Mowing, Maintenance and Repair of Landscaping 4. Lighting 5. Parking Facilities 6. Public Safety 7. The repair, maintenance, operation and replacement of existing public improvements, and those authorized by Section 429.021, within the boundaries of a special service.district established under section 2. & Other Municipal Services 9. Administration, Coordination, Studies and Preparation of Designs Section 2. ESTABLISHMENT OF SPECIAL SERVICE DISTRICT. Subd. 1. Ordinance. The governing body of the City may adopt ordinances establishing special service districts to include the land identified as the Cedarvale Retail Area as follows: Beginning at the centerline intersection point of Silver Bell Road and Beau- De-Rue Drive, then south along the centerline of Beau-De-Rue Drive approximately 660 feet to the south right-of-way line of Gold Trail, then southeasterly along said right-of-way approximately 100 feet to the east line of Leibel Addition, then south along said east line approximately 190 feet, then westerly along the south line of Leibel Addition approximately 290 feet to the centerline of Beau-De-Rue Drive, then southwesterly along said centerline approximately 430 feet to the centerline point of Beau-De-Rue Drive and Rahn Road, then southeasterly along centerline of Rahn Road 410 feet to the extended south line of Parcel 010-10,then southwesterly along said south line approximately 770 feet to its intersection with the west line of parcel 031-10, then south along said west line approximately 780 feet to the north line of Outlot A of Cedar Grove No.3, then west along said north line approximately 1,595 feet to the west line of the NE 1/4 of Section 19, then north along said west line approximately 1,150 feet to the extended south line of MnDOT Right-of-Way Plat No. 19-6, then northeasterly along said south line approximately 2,795 feet to its intersection with the southwest line of MnDOT Right-of-Way Plat No. 19-8, then easterly along said southwest line approximately 330 feet to the NE corner of the NE 1/4 of Section 19, then north along the east line of said right-of-way plat No. 19-8 approximately feet to the northwest comer of Parcel 120-54, then northeast approximately 185 feet to the north corner of said parcel, then southeast approximately 176 feet to the northeast corner of said parcel, then south approximately 192 feet to the centerline of Silver Bell Road, then west approximately 260 feet to the point of beginning at the centerline intersection of Silver Bell Road and Beau- De-Rue Drive. The provisions of Section 428A.01 govern the establishment and operation of special service districts in the city, except to the extent otherwise specified in Sections 1 and 2. Section 3. LOCAL APPROVAL. This article is effective the day after the governing body of the City of Eagan complies with Minnesota Statutes, Section 645.021, Subdivision 3. • • 39 i i ND # .. • .40 LLAS 2014.1t.le4IIIL I IIIIP�1DAY . ' ar 8T �•�.' . Cat --ri...........,...._,,L,...„. . . .., . Init WS, _ • ''-. J, a; OY- ! _ �'.. Ili fit•W • ' -. ,:iiiiiik ...:::47.. z.\•: :::. . • : 1 • ,afttir;‘...4ilii:: :::: :... : ` _ -.....::.' r Ad a ..:.. 0 ..:.x.x.:.:.:x.:::::::::::: : . :a :. ..::::::- .::::::::::::::::::::m PP - 4 OV3 le ; ill;revilferrivao e PaiPird ipp 12410 SAO 111Plar itto Ibiiii// 1 gip :: we_ 1 411 Rip am Nu 10 VI" 41,1■1140.- 24 glal.J1110411 rile NI■ ki 111111 fOrk t.. v41 ZV ID %NW 4111 IN IN Imo: 1001 ■► •/ �• ..i, 4. qrI/ SIN1 - ■� kis. 4i ♦ Is /11Ull1� 1 I�� t!�! 111 —= .Ilti 4 Si i r rr . •: �i ���I�awl.l, L.- E.A4AN AAA 1!.• 1 CEDARVALE AREA • PROPOSED SPECIAL SERVICE DISTRICT qo• CITY OF EAGAN ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EAGAN, MINNESOTA, AMENDING SECTION 14 OF THE CITY CODE BY PROVIDING FOR SPECIAL SERVICE DISTRICT #1 FOR LAND IDENTIFIED AS THE CEDARVALE RETAIL AREA The City Council of Eagan ordains: Section 1, That Sections 14.1 through 14.4 of the City Code shall be added to Chapter 14 of the City Code to read as follows: Title 14. Eagan Special Service District #1 Sec. 14.1 Purpose. The purpose of this ordinance is establish a Special Service District #1 capable of providing city services not ordinarily provided throughout the city from general fund revenues. Sec. 14.2 Services the district may provide. The Special Service District #1 may render or contract for such additional services as: 1. Promotion and management of the Cedarvale Retail Area as a trade or shopping area. 2. Signage Identifying the Overall Retail Area 3. Preparation, Mowing, Maintenance and Repair of Landscaping 4. Lighting 5. Parking Facilities 6. Public Safety 7. The repair,maintenance,operation and replacement of existing public improvements, and those authorized by Section 429.021, within the boundaries of a special service district established under section 2. 8. Other Municipal Services 9. Administration, Coordination, Studies and Preparation of Designs Sec. 14.3 Payment for services. The Special Service District #1 costs of services shall be paid from revenues collected from service charges imposed within the district. Sec. 14.4 Area included in district. L\. - The special service district shall include the land identified as Cedarvale Retail Area as follows: Beginning at the centerline intersection point of Silver Bell Road and Beau-De-Rue Drive,then south along the centerline of Beau-De-Rue Drive approximately 660 feet to the south right-of-way line of Gold Trail, then southeasterly along said right-of- way approximately 100 feet to the east line of Leibel Addition,then south along said east line approximately 190 feet, then westerly along the south line of Leibel Addition approximately 290 feet to the centerline of Beau-De-Rue Drive, then southwesterly along said centerline approximately 430 feet to the centerline point of Beau-De-Rue Drive and Rahn Road,then southeasterly along centerline of Rahn .Road 410 feet to the extended south line of Parcel 010-10,then southwesterly along said south line approximately 770 feet to its intersection with the west line of parcel 031-10, then south along said west line approximately 780 feet to the north line of Outlot A of Cedar Grove No.3,then west along said north line approximately 1,595 feet to the west line of the NE 1/4 of Section 19, then north along said west line approximately 1,150 feet to the extended south line of MnDOT Right-of-Way Plat No. 19-6, then northeasterly along said south line approximately 2,795 feet to its intersection with the southwest line of MnDOT Right-of-Way Plat No. 19-8, then easterly along said southwest line approximately 330 feet to the NE corner of the NE 1/4 of Section 19,then north along the east line of said right-of-way plat No. 19- 8 approximately 190 feet to the northwest corner of Parcel 120-54, then northeast approximately 185 feet to the north corner of said parcel, then southeast approximately 176 feet to the northeast corner of said parcel, then south approximately 192 feet to the centerline of Silver Bell Road, then west approximately 260 feet to the point of beginning at the centerline intersection of Silver Bell Road and Beau-De-Rue Drive. Section 2, Effective Date. This ordinance shall take effect upon its passage and publication PASSED this day of , 1994. Thomas A. Egan, Mayor CERTIFICATION I, EJ. VanOverbeke, Clerk of the City of Eagan, Dakota County, Minnesota, do hereby certify that the foregoing proclamation was duly passed and adopted by the City Council of the City of Eagan, Dakota County, Minnesota, in a regular meeting thereof assembled this day of , 1994. EJ. VanOverbeke, City Clerk City of Eagan • < o i g �gyyigppoyg11§Igpp§§RE�gpp§�§yyp§§ §pp1M1N• OPPIE1§1g§§§§g§F§g§Egg§ 1 s ,NWPNPO^ciAFIA .*:i �I�0YO1 -m N•f Rs*spM•.�p{ raro- O8 rN M} -m O r..Nrr N C.ju- (Jr. .► r YfMN grrNr.. �o . .-,- • ii N �: r M N M N M M M N N 0 M N 0 M N 0 M M M Mao N 0 0.0 0 0 00 00 0 N 0 M 0 0 00 0 N 0 M N N M M N > t E ��pp��pp��pp��pp nn oo ..pp ..pp.pp ,.pp��pp..4p.pp , 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 0 6 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 d O O d 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 8 3 S 0 I 0 0 0 V V =0 0 0 0 NQOas oO O Q 01QQD Q O Q r r 0 r 0 rrN OM o0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O Q r N 0 0 M 6....... OO O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O O OO O O O §EFFE$E§§§§§ §§§§ § §§§§ IEEE§§§ §MM§§§§Ri M M M M M M 00000000000000 O O O O ��yy p O O O O r 0 r 0 0 0 0 A al000000000000000000000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 t .r r r•f�O '1 al§IOIOPNgPNO a§§i PO§N M�d3N M 5S I§§§1NHON 1• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •'•fNMNhNMrNMPNM � pNNM PfMN PNp� �MMM r r r N j NIV 3 • y OC,►ii . 1 g , : . . W d nee I piii 11 - '� J H iJ.i 6 i J >W> -W W C W <i2ZNYWr� I[ M d><O um >0 W ]t 1 t 0OW Z! > 't 1< W-50'W y i<t d04 W.._ W K 6gt_pIC ..1 M F>d W<> W> gi`Y�16 Li ..W N 4i W V 07 r N - q 3 MINUTES OF THE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION Eagan, Minnesota Thursday, October 28, 1993 A meeting of the Eagan Economic Development Commission was held on Thursday, December 16, 1993 at 7:00 a.m. Present were Chair Eldon Johnson, Cathy Clark-Matuszak, Gary Morgan, Karl Oestriech, Tom Pederson, Kirk Duholm, Roger Hughes, and Pat Grinde. Also present were City Administrator Tom Hedges, Assistant to the City Administrator Jon Hohenstein, Community Development Director Peggy Reichert, Project Planner IGm Eggers, and CVB Executive Director Ann Carlon. AGENDA Pederson requested that an item to discuss the seven consensus items be added to the agenda under Old Business. The agenda was approved as modified. MINUTES Pederson requested that the minutes of the October EDC meeting be amended to state that the City Council directed the EDC to present issues as a group to the City Council, due to the fact that consensus item #2 states that "the EDC will report to the Council through staff reports and written memos from the EDC." The minutes as amended were approved by acclimation. OLD BUSINESS Cedarvale Special Service District Hohenstein reviewed the Special Service District information contained within the packet. Since the last EDC meeting, it has been determined that two public hearings are necessary for implementation of a Special Service District. The first public hearing concerns receipt of the petition by the Cedarvale merchants to the City Council followed by a request to the legislature to empower the City to form the district. The second public hearing will involve the approval of the Special Service District budget by the City Council. As such, it is not necessary to have a final budget until the special legislation is passes. Hohenstein and Morgan stated that the items included in the current petition are services that were specifically requested by the participating Cedarvale merchants. Morgan went on to state that on December 1st there was a merchants meeting to review the original petition and those merchants present wanted to add other potential services to the final petition. Morgan stated that the merchants feel that since the process for Special Service District approval is fairly involved and lengthy, it is appropriate to request LL01) all potential services at this time. Morgan reviewed the preliminary draft budget information contained in the EDC packet. He explained that one of the proposed budgets is for a five year term on the signage, and one is for a ten year term. Johnson noted that the Cedarvale Mall will pay the largest amount of money - $3,000. Morgan stated that 50% of the petitions have been submitted, and that these petitions are for properties totalling roughly 61% of the land and building values of the area. Only 25%of the property values within the proposed district are needed to forward the petition to the legislature for approval. Morgan stated that most of the large players in the area have signed, including Cedarvale Mall, Cedarvale Highlands, Fitzgerald's bowling alley, Norwest, and McDonalds. Morgan stated that he has spoken with Ted linker, property manager for the Silver Bell Center. Morgan believes that Silver Bell Center may sign the petition, and feels that if they do not sign the petition,they will not oppose it either. Morgan stated that he would like to include the Silver Bell Center in the Special Service District for now, simply because they account for 9% of the property value in the area, and it would be a good way to spread the assessments out. He strongly believes that Silver Bell Center will benefit from the Special Service District. Pederson pointed out that not all people who did not sign the petition would oppose the Special Service legislation. He asked Morgan to give an example of a person who did not sign the petition, but would not oppose it. Morgan stated the case of Randy Quam, who owns the old Crown Auto building. Mr. Quam feels he is already paying high taxes on the building and, on principle, would not sign anything that would raise his taxes. However, it does not appear that he would oppose the legislation. Hohenstein stated that the Special Service legislation requires a separate public hearing regarding the work plan and budget for the year. Hohenstein reviewed the steps required to enact a Special Service District: 1. 25%of property owners in the affected areas must sign petitions in favor of the Special Service District. 2. The City Council must hold a public hearing to approve the request and create a resolution to forward to the legislature. 3. The draft legislation must be presented at the State level. 4. If the legislation is approved, the City Council has authority to approve the ordinance creating a Special Service District. There is a 30-45 day waiting period in which property owners can oppose the legislation. 5. If there is not opposition from 35% or more of the affected properties, then a budget hearing is scheduled by the City Council. Hughes made a motion that the EDC recommend approval of the Special Service District to the City Council. Grinde seconded the motion. The motion passed unanimously. Morgan added that he would like Silver Bell Center included in the process, assuming that at worst they will remain neutral. Reichert pointed out that the City Council can make the determination to include or exclude Silver Bell Center. Once again, it was stated that the EDC approves the petition and recommends that it go forward. ILL> Agenda Information Memo December 21, 1993, City Council Meeting APPROVE JOINT POWER AGREEMENT (STREET SWEEPING. STRIPING & SEALCOATING) I. Approve Joint Powers Agreement (Street Sweeping, Striping & Sealcoating)—Every year for the past five years, the City has entered into a Joint Powers Agreement with Burnsville, Apple Valley, Rosemount, Lakeville, and Savage for the competitive bidding of street sweeping, traffic lane striping, pavement symbols/messages and sealcoating services in an attempt to get better unit prices through the economies of scale theory. This Joint Powers Agreement is again being presented to the City Council for their approval to again participate in this program for 1994. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the Joint Powers Agreement (Street Sweeping, Striping & Sealcoating) and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute all related documents. RECEIVE FEASIBILITY REPORT/ORDER PUBLIC HEARING (CEDAR GROVE 7. 8. 10 & 11 & APPLEBAUM ADDITIONS) J. Project 662,Receive Feasibility Report/Order Public Hearing (Cedar Grove 7,8, 10, 11 & Applebaum Additions - Street Rehabilitation)--In accordance with the City's 5-Year CIP, the staff has prepared a feasibility report addressing the rehabilitation needs of the residential subdivisions referenced above. An informational open house meeting was held on Monday, December 13, at Deerwood Elementary School to introduce the residents to the need for improvem is in their neighborhood and solicit input to the proposed project. Enclosed on pages k through j ,, is a summary of that meeting. A draft copy of the feasibility report at will be presented and discussed at the ublic hearing scheduled P 8 for January 18 will be distributed with the Additional Information Packet on Monday. This project affects approximately 420 property owners and incorporates approximately 6.2 miles of streets. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To receive the feasibility report for Project 662 (Cedar Grove 7, 8, 10, 11 &Applebaum Additions - Street Rehabilitation) and order a public hearing to be held on January 18, 1994. MEMO _city of eagan TO: FILE: PROJECT 662, CEDAR GROVE 7, 810 & 11 PROJECT 665, BLACKHAWK ROAD FROM: TOM COLBERT, DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS DATE: DECEMBER 17, 1993 SUBJECT: SUMMARY OF INFORMATIONAL OPEN HOUSE MEETING At 7:00 p.m. on Monday, December 13, the Public Works Department hosted an open house informational meeting for all property owners within the Cedar Grove 7, 8, 10, 11, and Applebaum Additions (Project 662) and adjacent to Blackhawk Road from Deerwood Drive to TH 13 (Project 665). Of the 500+ notices that were mailed, approximately 104 property owners were in attendance. The attached sign-in sheet reflects those who documented their attendance and are referenced on the attached maps. A coordinated presentation was made by the Director of Public Works, Superintendent of Streets/Equipment, Superintendent of Utilities, Director of Parks & Recreation, Assistant City Engineer, and the consulting engineer. The residents were informed of the history of their development,the current condition of the infrastructure and various improvements proposed to rehabilitate these facilities and add additional facilities (curb and gutter, trailways) to meet today's standards. At the conclusion of the 75 minute presentation, the meeting was adjourned to an open house format with all staff personally speaking with interested citizens and recording their concerns. This open discussion lasted approximately 40 minutes, with the meeting concluding at approximately 9:15 p.m. These two projects were combined for the informational open house due to the fact that several property owners are affected by both projects and it is likely that both projects would be awarded under the same contract for construction. The following is a list of the various issues and concerns that were shared with staff: Project 662, Cedar Grove 7. 8. 10. 11. and Applebaum Additions • Resident Near Carnelian Park - requested storm sewer be extended into the park to collect excessive drainage from skating rinks (will be incorporated into final storm sewer design.) 1 e • Resident On Pumice Lane - objected to same assessment for all single-family properties when some streets were in better condition requiring less corrective work as compared to others. (All properties of similar zoning must be assessed equally. Not practical to assess each homeowner based on the cost of just that portion of the street abutting their property.) • Realtor In Area - Questioned why the proposed assessments were higher than Cedar Grove 6 and 9. (Explained that assessments were based on City policy and would be reviewed for possible adjustments based on property appraisal similar to Cedar Grove 6 and 9 improvements in 1993.) • 3916 Riverton -General questions on assessment policy and procedure. Generally agrees with need for project. • 1831 Carnelian - Requested storm sewer be extended to pick up park drainage. (Will be done.) • 1937 Jade Lane - General questions regarding cost of project, percentage of participation and assessment formulas. • 3881 Palisade Circle - Strongly suggested that the City consolidate garbage collection to minimize the number of heavy truck loadings on local streets which add to the accelerated deterioration of streets. • Resident from Cedar Grove #8 - Inquired as to how streetlights could be installed in the neighborhood. (Informed him of the petition process requiring at least 51% of the property owners supporting such a request.) • Unknown Resident - Retired senior citizen expressed concern over financial impact of special assessment on his fixed income. (Informed him of City's Senior Citizen Deferment process at the time of final assessment hearing.) • 1721 Monticello Avenue (see attached letter) - Wanted assessment spread on front footage rather than per lot equivalent basis so that corner lots would pay more. (Explained the theory that each house benefits approximately the same based on their usage regardless of the amount of frontage.) • 4031 Pumice Lane - Inquired into difference between trail and sidewalk on Blackhawk Road. Purchased home in 1990 from previous owner who stated he had just finished paying for street reconstruction. (Will research assessment history on parcel but knew of no previous assessable project.) 2 • • 1745 Davenport - Suggested we should just overlay instead of reconstructing the street similar to how he handled his recent driveway improvement. (Explained the need to provide more structural support underneath pavement requiring removal and replacement.) • ooac Palisade Circle - Inquiry as to what the PCI rating was for his cul-de-sac. (This short cul-de-sac did not have a rating available.) • moo( Taconite Pointe - With the trail/sidewalk proposed along Blackhawk Road through his backyard, who would be responsible for the cost and maintenance. Also had general inquiries into the City's Pavement Management Program and PCI rating process. (Informed him that sidewalk improvement would not be assessed and presently the City does not require sidewalks and trailways to be maintained during the winter season.) • 1915 Jade Lane - Current low point in street floods into his yard during most rainstorms. (Will evaluate existing storm sewer system and provide additional inlet capacity if possible.) • Several Unknown Residents - Expressed general interest into neighborhood streetlights. (Were informed of the local improvement petition process.) Project 665. Blackhawk Road • 3750 Blackhawk Road (Ross Kramer) - Expressed strong opposition to proposed street improvement and trailway due to severe impact on privacy resulting from removal of extensive screening vegetation and large oak trees. Pleased with storm sewer design proposed to address ongoing drainage problems. (Explained the need to pursue alternative designs to minimize the impact of project on existing vegetation and incorporate landscaping improvements under project to mitigate impact.) • 3755 Blackhawk Road (Pomroy) - Stated concern with current drainage near Blackhawk Road and Robin Lane and objected to assessments for Blackhawk Road after paying substantial assessments for upgrading of Robin Lane in 1983. (Will review storm sewer design to ensure drainage problem is corrected, and will investigate previous assessment and possible credit for Blackhawk Road improvement.) • 3690 Blackhawk Road (Nelson) -Concerned about increased traffic and noise. Did not like the two-lot equivalent assessment and expressed displeasure with the need to provide additional trail easement and pay for a road used mostly by Blue Cross/Blue Shield. (Staff will review the appropriateness of the two-lot equivalent assessment and explained Blackhawk Road served the community at large in addition to Blue Cross/Blue Shield.) 3 �1 . • 3710 Blackhawk Road (Garza) - Objected to the proposed widening of Blackhawk Road and trail installation bringing pedestrians and traffic closer to her house. (No additional right-of-way required and house presently meets all proper setbacks.) • 3735 Blackhawk Road - Does not want trail along west side but felt the road improvements were needed. • Parcel 011-02, Section 17 (Mary Ann Wilson) - Inquired into the possibility of having sanitary sewer installed to her property as a part of project. (Staff will investigate best method to serve this and adjacent parcels with sanitary sewer and include in the project if appropriate.) • Parcel 012-02, Section 17 (Adjacent To Previous Parcel) - Similar inquiries as to potential sanitary sewer service. Also felt Blue Cross/Blue Shield should assume a heavier assessment due to their use of Blackhawk Road. (Explained the assessment policy and the proposed amount of assessment for BC/BS.) • Townview Addition (Allen Irish) - Expressed appreciation of informational meeting. Questioned how the townhome association's assessment would be spread over the entire complex and wondered whether the City's tree spade can.relocate smaller trees. Strong support for trail system, even at the expense of some trees. Suggested the City have replacement landscaping included in project. Based on these comments, staff will perform additional research and include the information in the final feasibility report proposed to be presented to the City Council on December 21, with the public hearing scheduled for January 18, 1994. /^\ Di ctor of Public Works TAC/jj Attachments: Sign-up Sheet Improvement Area Map cc: Mike Foertsch, Assistant City Engineer Arnie Erhart, Superintendent of Streets/Equipment Wayne Schwanz, Superintendent of Utilities Mark Hanson, BRAA 4 S • ! i•• 11 1 ' ' git'il 1! I St " try • I • , 14111 t, , , , I , . N . 4 4 .4 le) .I o h 1 i :1 , 1 4i •I t, . ••/ Ilk I I - -4 - ; 4zio %/.1 :*;,,,,,_ ;, 9 be 1.1 iiisi , . 6\ ... . 1 I S I � � 602 ,.... 4 . ,, .\1 , ■ f 1 1 ` • • ili..,, • 111 I 0 ta. I• •. , • .i .: _. . i , . ,,„. , ; .:=. ..1 . , ..... i • . , . _: i .); _, , ,b . ........ c4.., . _ cii . . ) 1 , 1 I 0 . ,.. . . I 1 ,� ` ` .; t • • s. 4- . , , LAI 1 j . : : 1 . 1 1 , .: I 'T ,:i I: °31'' • 1, 1 ...: 1 ' re. 'i - ' I ' .1 .‘1 il • 1 • _ ,i : _� a 1 i .N.1111 • . ' •■ t'' • : _t j 41 1 .., -. 1, i, . _1 :''' 11 • 1 _ . ;� i\ 5 C) . • It . • NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING CEDAR GROVE 7, 1, 10, 11 E ZEN APPLEBAUX ADDITIONS 6 BLACZBAmm ROAD MONDAY, DECEMBER 13, 1993 MAKE ADDRESS 1. 0 ,2)4, 4630 //k o, ,t A- 3±f /yr,g ,c3.11/ 3. I YIe)∎.‹..-gnu)bard 4O S BJGr k hG ui I� 4.SchMm ) rJ s. /o_f, T.sci, e, .�81 A ( i sck of t mitt)) 6.i T t f l Ai {Z 1 19S-3 .i 1 . Lew f_ 7., Deem; S E 3948 B IetcA3a4.,/k C rc1 , 9J111016 ,1 Cifi NEL,o w L w io.pa4v/cd 37/ re► vc,eJ-on) 4'E 11. 661/;9141 P t ict 13.42 t' ,4 7-Zueeft r /P37 L4 . • 14. aky . c- - (7(o S&lr�e(( 15..b, 14 :+ �l, riOS( Dn . 16. # CA w GC sps C"'erfj &lac 0a1-1--�i � t1 17. ,/2/AN R-491411 E(tOk "e■fts, 74K� 1s. ;t4 /C Scl ze Yo76 0 -,s,,,tc L+►�. 19.a ;LTh 6c " It 20. el r/,4 / • _ /715 3406 2 tr/Ed LTS#5 • DEIGEBOREOOD MEETING CEDAR GROVE 7, $, 10, 11 i I= APPLEBAIIX ADDITIONS i BLACESAWX ROAD I[ONDAY, DECEMBER 13, 1993 NIKE ADDRESS 1."Aft i /),-Nece.( .• 17 -J $A-ttrk'c t_ 411 Cote nA, G-mac ttkly S. J. ' • 0 gC L 1 dif, A 6. . And4r10.18._ 3 `61 Grti--K4 , 4, . 7. , F ,r B. / Y 9/g-get-J14,..4 sde�_ 041(0 r 3 v( E, ✓eat,r 'L • -‘ 11 '*v\ [held a ck cL 9-� 10. (ReLraa.c. 3sir- Qhrk.l . 12,1 11. �M 376, 9 ,?1.na Gl< 12. LL444,4- ?I - 17 yl 13. 14. 15. 1s. 17. 1$. 19. 20., LTS#5 NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING CEDAR GROVE 7, 1, 10, 11 & UN APPLEBAUM ADDITIONS BLACEKAIZ ROAD MONDAY, DECEMBER 13, 1993 EA ADDRESS 1. //e Irish 1733 Bl tee A// 1)c.'ve 2. 4,ehuo /117 44e14- /la 4u ' 3. vt v{ 4„� (737 f a t ;Sa/e C i rA �ICk 4. l.,l L.a11t Lt!7 S y CI • 14AQAP 641v,1 s. Lao" c w tr ,e��c 6• • ct� bk C /?G 2 /fri A'&/ 7 AMtifr 45'1 /7 Re .0fe4ESte-1 9. Of. $/rVi 'get:JIMA/4 AN so. :N• f .;11� kasse. 3 851 `odthii•te_ C; 11■ i . . i < 2 'f4� ' ��9c r 7;er 12. 4114 -a-A . %.121.1:42.4640.1.11(zza.244_,/ 13 _ J4111.7411440 /0 13. a.,.,�.,.d- 3'T S sat c_L.L. u.J k 11 16. .. oN Poiro , 375c 6 (ae kilo L.0 lc gal 4 /44 Atrilt LJf J 7PWWSLZatika 1$. • 19. 20. LTS#5 NEIGHBORHOOD KKEETING CEDAR GROVE 7, 5, 10, 3.1 5 ZEN APPLEBAUX ADDITIONS BLACEEAIIX ROAD MONDAY, DECEMBER 3.3, 1993 NAME ADDRESS 1.7&./ teda fol4S2, 3,74If- Q101.J •0. 62V. s./rte =d __,_ s <� , 7es 6.22/ 3. /7 SAS g/iSee�i A 4• LOA Li0c3 Unto-NA, • tkelnef 5. v ,4 ur 4 rl� 6. .11/1 D11iL M.�.2 nial?. 04.4.vL tii Q.. L . 7. ask pr.rs.�N S.ar.44e 64•417i-- 39 f- t4( (+440)K 2. CL MO/41 Zgi dorektar 1 , 10 �++. A killv'N- /9T 7 0-Aa w im 11.(e, , 4. lets (6 VYla_rle.s /7 9, gA.&NO-4 A Al LA.v& 12. �/J.I� SA i1v ' S X.�• 13. MO/LW_ i,ko , b`(0 ke1'cIa A,3 k p, 14. in n_ />l. .=3h q PCP . 15 tAl Sf\JM $(\tVii COCUltift 11-10 1 ritkilattAki, 11.�-TL/1 C' 4 ' �'ir.- 381'6 A i v t.eroiv 4v - • 17., I dM ! LAS 44 E► .)l3A444 1811 6,11--41•r. R 4 is, eN L t o o k 3 110,1 L. e skeme- . 19.` ieff.1 AQ.16 2 3x2 cour rrof Gtif4x Lill s0.3r.t4U2 y*LEImA 4oc'mAN/ 1741 DAll pater 4 LTS#5 570 • _111,1 - 1W ViNf 1110 - .** Volum - _**# * ;tit *AI ma_ 1111111 WIN Is go NOR • 1 \ ttlis tow 10-0111m J. .,01; at$UPE LI a .1167Viiii - a Amor sia ----I - IC --I- Ili MIN III . . .- CEDAR GROVE No. 7, cm PROJ. No. 652 . I::::::. reap. ::::::::.:::::.: :::::::::::::::: . - 11104740111 a 4 '''4,40111 Ul . S . 3411 4 t °` 1 'Midi, ... . , --1:itticic Nalklm. :::::::::::::::::::: "••••• "tin , I..::: 1 pm, ,,,eimg .::::::::::::::::.:.:::. ........... _ ::::::::::: , :.:.:.:.:.:. • ;::::::::::::::::::::::: . ......„ , .. _ „.i.: 1 , . rr__..„ aa.. lie& drill \ . imp. Ippon L .- IIII 1 iiii 0 .......,.: __, A, ,...._ -,--. Htitiothill11 1::::::11: CEDAR GROVE No. 8 & io, CITY veo+.so. 662 • l SAAR BELL ROAD Pa 1 . pi L . ,,,, ......, Tilkilv „,,,,,* . ,, 1 n.g . . , ,,,kf .E , " ' III . I- Nj • �N APPFI�UM 1 }• . . Ni • CEDAR GROVE No. 11 & CITY PR . No. 662 KEN MPl[9gUM IDg110N ` J is d .' . Ae+r NJ • y • 3 4__ rso Soo �W So*MNw 740' �-' 9'— ^i�.r, ` ., -~> C11Y OF EAGAN 450• :0..4'. 2 95' SIC( PILL PitRIC 010-77 :::: 2LE .-� � l I LI 0 R, TRIbG` - 020-78 , I I I mmr'E JEW ACPES 030-78 ZLf vk kOWTRY U( LEGEND •Cifilititilii:::::::::iiiii::::::::::::S: ZI1 I I ZE—MNBER LOT'EOtJNALEW7S(t£,) ...•.... - . KYILO IA••FRONT FOOT ASSESSAIEM ,,' 11-75• (NON RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY) :::.:•:::•::X::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::.:*:::::.::::. ••..• : ?tE .." —DRIVEWAY ACCESS :o ti~ : ---ELF 010-80 030-80 `�= 1� 040-751 1LE •020-80 411.0811 ':.12 *14:? 1LE 060-75 - ....***Is47 r * . I.+*.., , • 061=00 ;Q• .i .... : :: 0-75 t uE ,41> i to 01x 6 • SILVER DEL R --------II111 I I ) tflt 6LACKHAWK ROAD CITY PROJECT No. 665 L2,-D . Agenda Information Memo December 21, 1993, City Council Meeting RECEIVE FEASIBILITY REPORT/ORDER PUBLIC HEARING (BLACKHAWK ROAD STREET REHABILITATION/UPGRADE) K. Project 665, Receive Feasibility Report/Order Public Hearing (Blackhawk Road - Street Rehabilitation/Upgrade)--In accordance with the City's 5-year CIP,Blackhawk Road has been scheduled for rehabilitation and upgraded improvements for 1994. Subsequently, a feasibility report has been prepared identifying the details of this project. In addition to street and utility rehabilitation, the Parks & Recreation Department's Master Trail Plan proposes to install a 6' concrete sidewalk on the west side and an 8' bituminous trailway on the east side of this project. An informational open house meeting was held on Monday, December 13,at Deerwood Elementary School in combination with Project 662. The results of that meeting are addressed in the summary memo included in this agenda under the previously referenced pages. A draft copy of the feasibility report that will be presented and discussed at the public hearing scheduled to be held on January 18, 1994, will be included with the Additional Information Packet on Monday. This project will have more of an impact on adjacent property owners due to the fact that there will be some widening of the existing 2-lane rural road section north of Silver Bell Road and the installation of the sidewalk and trailways affecting some landscaping improvements that have been performed within public right-of-way over the years. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To receive the feasibility report for Project 665 (Blackhawk Road Street Rehabilitation/Improvements) and schedule a public hearing to be held on January 18, 1994. ACKNOWLEDGE COMPLETION/AUTHORIZE CITY MAINTENANCE (DEERHAWK ADDITION) L. Contract 93-W, Acknowledge Completion/Authorize City Maintenance (Deerhawk Addition - Services)—The installation of individual sanitary sewer and water services to service the newly created single-family lots within the Deerhawk Addition located in the southeast corner of Deerwood Drive and Blackhawk Road were installed privately under the terms and conditions of the development contract agreement. They have been inspected by City authorized personnel and found to be in compliance with the authorized plans and specifications and ready for formal acknowledgement of completion and authorization for perpetual City maintenance. • ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To acknowledge completion of Contract 93-W (Deerhawk Addition- Services) and authorize perpetual City maintenance subject to the warranty terms and conditions as identified in the development contract agreement. (C) Agenda Information Memo December 21, 1993, City Council Meeting STONEBRIDGE PONDS ADDITION - EASEMENT VACATION REIMBURSEMENT M. Stonebridge Ponds Addition-Easement Vacation Reimbursement—On December 7, the City Council held a public hearing to consider the vacation of a utility and ponding easement for Pond JP-27 subject to its rededication as a part of the Stonebridge Ponds Addition located in the northwest corner of Diffley and Dodd Roads. Because the area of the rededication on the final plat was less than the area requested to be vacated under the public hearing,the City Council approved the vacation subject to the developer reimbursing the City for the cost of the City's previous acquisition of this ponding easement in the amount of $4,575. In addition, the City Council directed staff to research the costs associated with the private installation of the 12" trunk water main along Dodd Road and to negotiate a credit with the developer for the reimbursement of the pond easement vacation. The estimated cost of the oversizing of the Dodd Road trunk watermain was approximately $6,000. In negotiating a credit, the developer was reminded that it was his choice to perform the installation privately rather than petitioning for a City project whereby he would be obligated only for a lateral benefit portion. Subsequently, the Director of Public Works reached an agreement with the developer for a credit of 50% ($2,287.50) to be applied against the required reimbursement for the vacation of the ponding easement. This credit is being brought to the City Council's for formal ratification. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To authorize a credit of $2,287.50 towards the reimbursement requirement for the vacation of a ponding and utility easement within the Stonebridge Ponds Addition. Agenda Information Memo December 21, 1993 City Council Meeting X At the November 16, 1993 City Council meeting, a public hearing was set for December 21, 1993 to consider the refinancing of the Surrey Gardens and Aspen Woods Apartments. Although the bonds were originally issued through the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency, the City would be the issuer on the refunding bonds. Enclosed on pages — and is a copy of a letter from Dan Gustafson, representing the applicants, which answers the questions raised at the previous meeting and further explains the transactions. Dave MacGillivray of Springsted, as the City's fiscal advisor,has reviewed the proposal and sees no problems with it. Steve Rosholt of Faegre & Benson, as bond counsel, has made a preliminary review and will continue to review all documents on behalf of the City. Due to the nature of the refundings, two separate public hearings have been noticed. The transactions must close before January 28, 1994 to have funds available for a March refunding. REFUNDING BONDS/SURREY GARDENS APARTMENTS A. Issuance of Multifamily Housing Revenue Refunding Bonds - Surrey Gardens Apartments--This refunding issue is for an amount not to exceed $2,555,000 of aggregate principal. The applicants have made a determination to switch from a variable rate loan to a fixed rate transaction on Surrey Gardens. Consequently, final approval can be given if approved by the City Council. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To close the public hearing and to approve, deny or continue the resolution giving final approval to the issuance of the multifamily housing revenue refunding bonds -Surrey Gardens. REFUNDING BONDS/ASPEN WOODS OF EAGAN B. Issuance of Multifamily Housing Revenue Refunding Bonds -Aspen Woods of Eagan-- This refunding issue is for an amount not to exceed $6,210,000 of outstanding principal. A decision about the final form of the financing has not been made on this issue. Consequently, only preliminary approval can be given at this time. Assuming approval of the preliminary resolution by the City Council, a resolution for final approval will come before the Council in January. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To close the public hearing and to approve, deny or continue the resolution giving preliminary approval to the issuance of multifamily housing revenue refunding bonds - Aspen Woods of Eagan. t.2� D. H GUST ON COMP, REAL ESTATE DEVELOPMENT AND MANAGEMENT SINCE 1968 December 9, 1993 Mayor Thomas Egan and City Council Eagan City Hall 3830 Pilot Knob Road P.O. Box 21199 Eagan, MN 55121 RE: SURREY GARDENS AND ASPEN WOODS APARTMENTS ISSUANCE OF TAX EXEMPT REVENUE BONDS Dear Mayor Egan and Members of the City Council: Surrey Gardens and Aspen Woods Apartments were constructed in 1984 financed with tax exempt revenue bonds issued by the Minnesota Rousing Finance Agency. The revenue bond program was designed to provide affordable rental housing tc "low and moderate income" households without the use of Section 8 or other federal subsidies. The Department of Housing and Urban Development also provided mortgage insurance on these properties. The mortgage was underwritten on the basis that rents and expenses would increase at the same rate; however, . expenses over the past 10 years have exceeded revenues and these properties have lost their economic viability over the years. In March, 1994 the owners have an opportunity to refinance, changing the interest paid from a current rate of 11.10% (including mortgage insurance and servicing) to a rate between 6 1/2 & 7 % The Minnesota Housing Finance Agency no longer provides a mortgage program such as the one used in 1984. Accordingly, we are requesting the City of Eagan to act as !sourer .of the bonds. Your positive response to our request will serve to enhance the continued quality of these properties and ensure the ongoing availability of affordable rental housing to the residents of Eagan. specifically the public purpose served in providing this form of financing is as follows: I. Under the bond program, owners agree to rent at least 75% of units to households that qualify as "low and moderate income" under HUD guidelines. 144661 Chicago Avanue Sash,Bwrnsviue,MN 55306 (612)432-8240 T 2. The City will receive an annual fee of 1/8 percent of the original amount of the mortgages (approximately $9,000) to be used as it chooses for the development of housing in the community. 3. Reduced interest rates will allow the owners to return to the income expense ratios under which the properties were constructed. This will provide a stronger economic base for operation and additional funds for maintenance and ongoing improvements to the properties. I will be pleased to provide any further information regarding our request prior to or at the public hearing on December 21. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, YANKEE DOODLE ASSOCIATES S - Y GARDEN APARTMENTS i • Dan H. Gustafs• General Partner DHG/sh • • Agenda Information Memo December 21, 1993,City Council Meeting 3VATERVIEW ADDITIQN (TRUNK S4NITARX SEWER&WATERMAIN) C. F q ect 666, Waterview Addition Trunk Sanitary Sewer & Watermain)--On November 16, the City Council received a feasibility report for the public installation of trunk sanitary sewer and Nvatetmain extensions to service the proposed Waterview Addition development and Scheduled a public hearing to be held on December 21. Enclosed on pages a a sj. is a copy of the feasibility report for the Council's reference. An informational ne '�' +"' '�hcd meeting was held with interested affected property owners on lhesday, December 14, at 7:00 p.m. at City Hall. A summary y of that meeting will be distributed with the Additional Information packet on Monday. All notices have been published in the legal newspaper and sent to all potentially affected property owners informing them of this public hearing. Due to the fact that the need for this project is precipitated by the proposed Waterview Addition development, it may be appropriate to continue the public hearing and consider action after the disposition of the rezoning and preliminary plat have been fully addressed by the City Council which is scheduled for later on the agenda. If the development proposal is approved, it would then be appropriate for the Council to give favorable consideration to this petition. However,if the development is not approved, this project is not necessary and should be denied. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve/deny Project 666 (Waterview Addition-Trunk Sanitary Sewer&Watermain)and,if approved,authorize the preparation of detailed plans and specifications. ce \ r. city of cac�cn Report for Waterview► Utility Extensions City Project No. 666 Eagan, Minnesota November File No. 49548 1993 Bonestroo n Rosen. Ander!Ik & Associates a Ahlta ,Enns roa straut Mlnnaot Q� p } Co Q G,?anker a>RE. Howard A.Sanford P.E. Agnes 4.Reg AJC.P. treks B Jensen.PE. B 'ne `roo Ititzen W.Rowe RE!' UIRh A.Gordon.P.E. Philp J.Pyre.P.E. L I�ep Greek P.E. Joseph C.Andni&P.E. Robert 1!Veneer.P.E. Therms W.Peterson.P.E. Karen 1.Wemen.PE. Rose Marvin t.Soerntt.tE. mow W Few Ck Mkswael C.Leith.tic. Gary Q Khstder.PE trig Itched E Tone PE. Dare 0 Loslate.P1. .Notes R.Malang.PE. F Todd Foster.PE 11 1:313 JMtR ..1 Q bents*cock.pi. Robert C Menet ALA. lefty 0 Pettish.P.E. . Keith R.Tapp.PE Ande(tin & Thomas,1 Nayes.RE. Jerry A.Rounder.PE.. Scott J Agganek.PE. Douglas.1 Benoit.P.E. Rltben G.Sc't cht.P.E. Mark A.Hanson.P.E. Kenneth P.Anderson.P.E. Shawn D.Gusteson.RE Associates Soon M Seen CPA Michael T.R+w*mam,P.1. Mark R Roes P.E. Cecil's,ORvtet.P.E *Senior Corselet Ted K.Field.PE. Mark A.SecµPE. Paul G.Feuer.PE. Thomas R.Andersors.AS.A. Gary W.Morena.P.E. John P Gorder.P.E. Engineers & Architects Donald C.etegm t.PE. Daniel J.Edgerton.PE. Charles A.Erickson Thomas E.Angus.PE. A.Ride Schmidt.P.E. Leo M.Pawelsky L, y 1 M towel Martins.PE. Philp J Caswell.PE. Harlan M Olson November 11, 1993 Michael P Rau.PS. Mark D.TuaRS.P.E. James F Engelhardt City of Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Rd. Eagan,MN 55122 Re: Waterview Addition Sanitary Sewer & Water Main Extensions Project No. 666 Our File No.49548 Dear Mayor and Council: Attached is our report for the Watiew Addition Sanitary Sewer and Water Main Extensions. The proposed utility extensions are presented and discussed within the report along with detailed cost - estimates and a preliminary assessment roll. We will be pleased to meet with the Council and other interested parties at a mutually convenient time to discuss the report. Yours very truly, BONESTROO,7 OSENE,ANDERUIK& ASSOCIATES,INC. • Mark A. Hanson MAH:po End. I hereby certify that this report was prepared by me . or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Registered Professional Engineer under the laws of the Stat of Minnesot . 4C/1/ a d . Mark A. Hanson , , / A...Rip, s ate: November it 1993 Reg. No. 14260 Reviewed . L ..s A ,.., . 0 epartment of ' '■ Works . cs Reviewed by: w Fins ce Department Date: , ,r. It / _ ._ G . I 2335 West Haghway 36 • St. Paul, MN 55113 • 612-636-4600 ti WATERVIEW ADDITION SANITARY SEWER & WATER MAIN EXTENSIONS EAGAN, MINNESOTA PROJECT NO. 666 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL, I TABLE OF CONTENTS 2 SCOPE 3 FIGURE NO. 1 - LOCATION PLAN FEASIBILITY AND RECOMMENDATION 3 DISCUSSION 5 SANITARY SEWER 5 WATER MAIN - 6 COST ESTIMATE 7 EASEMENTS AND PERMITS 7 AREA TO BE INCLUDED 8 ASSESSMENTS 8 REVENUE SOURCES 9 PROJECT SCHEDULE 10 APPENDIX A - PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE 11 APPENDIX B - PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL 13 FIGURE NO. 2 - OPTION A T.H. 3 UTILITY EXTENSION FIGURE NO. 3 - OPTION B DODD ROAD UTILITY EXTENSION FIGURE NO. 4 - T.H. 3 UTILITY EXTENSION FIGURE NO. 5 - TRUNK AREA ASSESSMENT REPORT FOR WATERVIEW ADDITION SANITARY SEWER& WATER MAIN EXTENSIONS EAGAN, MINNESOTA PROJECT NO. 666 Scope This project provides for the extension of sanitary sewer and water main to serve the southeasterly corner of Eagan adjacent to T.H. No. 3. The project is being considered at this time due to the proposed Waterview Addition located south of Pond LP-26 between T.H.No. 3 and Dodd Road, as shown on Figure No. 1. Waterview Addition incorporates one platted parcel and three unplatted parcels. Approximately 20 single family residential lots are proposed in the Waterview Addition plat. Feasibility and Recommendations The project is feasible from an engineering standpoint and is in accordance with the objectives established in the Eagan's Comprehensive Sanitary Sewer and Water Plans. The project can best be carried out as one contract. Two options(A and B)were investigated to extend utilities to serve this area, as shown on Figures No.2 and 3. Option A provides for extending sanitary sewer and water main along the west side of T.H.No. 3 (east side Pond LP-26), while Option B provides for extending sanitary sewer and water main in Dodd Road (west side Pond 12-26) south of McFadden Trail in Lakeview Trail Addition. Option A is recommended for the following reasons: • Area B can be served with gravity sewer, therefore not requiring a lift station as shown on Figure No. 3. The estimated cost for the lift station and forcemain to serve Area B is nearly equal to the cost for the sanitary sewer extension along T.H. No. 3 and the jacking required to serve Area B under T.H. No. 3 and CP Rail System (Soo Line). 49548.ipt3 - OIFFLEY ROAO(Co. Rd.30) ic'.-----. *�•-. ' '.. =1103 �' �� 3'11/ • 'M Pt ER iii r r� rw iii MI mil :,.. � 1t 411.=r - r tiff* 4 sei "� Cr) et:. lli, .1 • y T �Qi*�'��� N i... 1, �! r `•� ` i"fi t.op 1 I- "`r`% "� 11 1u ����� .:� 1 Z�`� �ii "f ,,i fl .. 111t �� ht �..t matte ,.� .ij, ...L.+�s� • y�'� i Mini Ili' mg P. •,". oil,instant f1 COM �tt. ,h tu.!'�� CD ,��t l f tl i �� it �: �. „ 6 *,*4b. i! IIdli' iuI . �g`'�'"'S• ,[ -E 1 1..... �j: �� �t�7" �ff■...�..��1� 11f .. 71.` - 1t1 arw c'."%\ #`NI- --- � CLIFF ROAD( Co. di,I 1 i ; O WOE /0/11411 m 11 : ,t T 4"044 , r 11 yii f. � •.�, s z I - -=• • , PROJECT L?CATION j i ah, PRO.OS£O WATERS/1EW ',ITION .! F_ ;"� •Nj "MN i l� I IIII ROSEMO UN T 0 1000 2000 Wii Seok in feel • • • LOCATION PLAN n Bonestroo Rosene EAGAN, MINNESOTA FIGURE 1 Iii Anderiik Q WATERVIEW ADDITION, CITY PROD, No. 666 Associates 49548F02.DWG NOVEMBER 1993 COMM. 49548 1 • The sanitary sewer extension in Dodd Road (Option B) requires cuts of 20' plus to properly serve the Waterview Addition. Presently, sanitary sewer and water main are not required or desired by the property owners along Dodd Road. • The costs for Options A and B, including the extensions in T.H. No.3 and Dodd Road, are nearly equal (Option A = $190,000; Option B = $170,000). However the cost to construct a lift station to serve Area A will more than offset the $20,000 cost savings difference. • Option A enables the C1► to defer constructing sanitary sewer in Dodd Road until it's required by further development or needed by existing property owners. Option A requires the existing bituminous shoulder and guardrail in T.H. No. 3 to be removed and reconstructed, due to the location of Pond LP-26 (DNR wetland). It's recommended Option A be submitted to the DNR and Mn/DOT for their review. It's also recommended soil borings be taken along the sewer alignment in conjunction with Mn/DOT's review to confirm cost estimates presented herein. The relocation of NSP's gas main will have to be reviewed and coordinated with NSP. It's expected that,because the gas main is located in Mn/DOT's right-off-way,'the City will incur costs for NSP to reconstruct the gas main: Discussion Sanitary er Two options (A and B) were investigated to serve the Waterview Addition and the remaining southeast corner of Eagan, as presented on Figures No. 2 and 3. Option A provides for extending sanitary sewer along T.H. ;No. 3 in accordance with the Comprehensive Sewer Policy Plan for Eagan, dated 1991. Option A also allows Area B,as shown on Figure No. 2, to be served with a gravity sewer,while Option B requires a sanitary sewer lift station and forcemain to serve Area B. The Dodd Road sanitary sewer extension proposed as part of Option B is not deep enough to properly serve Area B with a gravity sewer. As previously discussed, the recommended Option is A, which provides for the sanitary sewer extension in T.H. No. 3 right-of-way. Internal sanitary sewer serving Waterview Addition will be constructed privately by the developer. 5 gTh As noted on Figure No. 4, due to the location of Pond LP-26, the existing bituminous shoulder and guardrail along T.H. No. 3 will have to be removed and reconstructed. In addition, it's expected the existing NSP gas main will have to be removed and reconstructed. Traffic control and Jersey Barriers will be required along T.H. No. 3 to maintain two-way traffic and protect the southbound traffic lane. The average annual daily traffic (AADT), per Mn/DOT, in T.H. No. 3 south of Cliff Road is 9,000, based on latest available counts ('89 -'90). It's proposed that the sanitary sewer in T.H. No. 3 be 8" in diameter. This 8" diameter sewer assumes no future extensions into the cities of Inver Grove Heights and Rosemount which is in compliance with the City's most recent Comprehensive Guide Plan. Water Main It's proposed to serve the Waterview Addition with water main along the same alignment as sanitary sewer. It's presently felt, due to the number of lots in the Waterview Addition, that the looping of water main in Dodd Road with the existing 8" water main serving Lakeview Trail Addition is not required at this time. The water main construction proposed herein includes only that water main in T.H. No. 3 right-of- way, as shown on Figure No. 4. Internal water main serving Waterview Addition will be constructed privately by the developer. The Waterview Addition is located in the high pressure zone and is expected to experience static and residual pressures of approximately 91.0 and 63.2 psi (pounds per square inch), respectively. Homes in the Waterview Addition below elevation 950 may require individual pressure reducing valves because it's expected their static pressures may exceed 85 psi. 49548.rpt 6 -13 • Cost Estimate A detailed can estimate is presented in Appendix A located at the back of this report and is summarized below. The total estimated project cost is $189,870, which includes 5% contingencies and 30% for indirect costs. Indirect costs include administrative, engineering, interest, and legal expenses. Sanitary Sewer $148,750 Water Main 41.120 Total Estimated Project Cost $189,870 It should be noted the total estimated project cost includes $13,400 to relocate the existing gas main by NSP. Easements and Permits The proposed sanitary sewer and water main construction along T.H. Np. 3 does not require permanent easements. However, it is expected temporary construction easements may be required from Parcel. 021-27 and the easterly part of Waterview Addition along TH. No. 1 Permits are required from Mn/DOT to work in the T.H. No. 3 right-of-way. It's not expected a permit will be required from the DNR because no work is required below their NOHW. However,because the work is directly abutting a DNR wetland, the plans will be sent to the DNR for their review. Permits are also required from the MPCA, MWCC, and MHD for sanitary sewer and water main extension. Coordination with NSF to reconstruct their existing gas main due to the sanitary sewer construction in T.H. No. 3 right-of-way is also required. .rpt 7 Area to be Included Section 36 Dodd View Addition Parcel 010-07 (Waterview Addition) Outlot A Parcel 02-004 (Waterview Addition) Parcel 010-51 Outlot B Parcel 031-04 Parcel 010-82 Outlot B Parcel 032-04 Parcel 020-06 (Waterview Addition) Outlot B Parcel 033-04 Parcel 020-51 Outlot C Parcel 04-004 Parcel 021-27 Lot 1 Block 1 Parcel 021-79 Lot 1 Block 2 Parcel 022-79 Lot 2 Block 2 Parcel 030-28 Lot 3 Block 2 Parcel 040-28 Lot 4 Block 2 Parcel 050-27 Lot 1 Block 3 Parcel 050-28 Lot 2,3 Block 3 Parcel 032-03 Parcel 060-27 Lot I Block 4 Parcel 070-27 (Waterview Addition) Moroni Addition Lot 1 Block 1 Lot 2 Block 2 Assessments Assessments are proposed to be levied against the benefitted property in accordance with Eagan's assessment policy for this work. Sanitary Sewer and Water Main Sanitary sewer and water main proposed herein is trunk, as identified in Eagan's Comprehensive Sewer and Water Policy Plan. It's proposed to assess two properties their lateral benefit from trunk rate for trunk sewer and water, based on their assessable footage shown on Figure No. 4. It's also proposed to assess trunk area charges to those parcels shown on Figure No. 5. Listed below are the 1993 trunk rates for lateral benefit and area charges. 49548.rpt Trunk Area Lateral Benefit Rate/Area &WM Sanitary Sewer $17.80/F.F. $1540/acre $740/lot Water Main $15.80/F.F. $1615/acre $775/lot Revenue Sources Project Cost Revenue Balance Sanitary Sewer Trunk Sewer/Water $189,870 Lateral Benefit Sewer $ 8,366 Lateral Benefit Water 7,426 Trunk Area Sewer 93,298 Trunk Area Water 76.522 Total $189,870 $185,612 -$4,258 The estimated project deficit is$4,258,which will be the responsibility of the trunk sanitary sewer and water main funds. 4948.rpt 9 PROJECT SCHEDULE Present Feasibility Report November 16, 1993 Public Hearing December 21, 1993 Approve Plans and Specifications February 1994 Open Bids/Receive Easements/Award Contract March 1994 Substantial Completion July 1994 Complete Construction August 1994 Assessment Hearing October 1994 First Payment Due with Real Estate Taxes May 1995 49548.rpt 10 APPENDIX A PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE WATERVIEW ADDITION SANITARY SEWER & WATER MAIN EXTENSIONS PROJECT NO. 666 Sanitary.Sewer 900 L.F. 8" PVC, 0'•15' deep in place @ $45.Q0/L.F. $ 40,500.00 350 L.F. 8" PVC, 15'-22' deep in place @ $50.00/L.F. 17,500.00 4 Each Std. 4' diameter manhole w/casting @ $1,200.00 ea 4,800.00 15 L.F. MH depth greater than 8' deep @ $80.00/L.F. 1,200.00 3.6 L.F. 8" outside drop @ $150.00/L.F. 540.00 1,800 L.F. Improved pipe foundation, 6" deep @ $2.00/L.F. 3,600.00 l Each Connect to exist. MH @ $500.00 ea 500.00 Subtotal $68,640.00 5% Contingency 3.430.00 $72,070.00 + 30% Indirect Cost 21,620.00 Total Sanitary Sewer $93,690.00 • 49548 rpt 11 Water Main 1,250 L.F. 8" DIP water main in place @ $18.00/L.F. $22,500.00 20 L.F. 6" DIP water main in place @ $16.00/L.F. 320.00 3 Each 8" gate valve and box @ $450.00 ea 1,350.00 • 2 Each 6" gate valve and box @ $400.00 ea 800.00 2 Each Hydrant @ $1,200.00 ea 2,400.00 1 Each Connect to existing 8" water main @ $500.00 ea 500.00 1,500 Lb. Fittings @ $1.50/Ib. 2.250.00 Subtotal $30,120.00 5% Contingency 1,510.00 $31,630.00 + 30% Indirect Cost 9.490.00 Total Water Main $41,120.00 T.H. 3 Restoration/Gas Main Relocation 650 L.F. Jersey barrier @ $5.00/L.F. 3,250.00 LUMP SUM Traffic control @ $2,000.00 2,000.00 1,200 S.Y. Remove bituminous pavement @ $1.50/S.Y. 1,800.00 700 L.F. Remove & reconstruct exist. guardrail @ $5.00/L.F. 3,500.00 60 L.F. Remove & reconstruct exist. culvert @ $5.00/L.F. 300.00 40 L.F. Remove & reconstruct exist. storm sewer crossing @ $20.00/L.F. 800.00 LUMP SUM Shoulder grading @ $3,000 3,000.00 600 Ton Class 5 aggregate base @ $8.00/ton 4,800.00 150 Ton Bituminous base course @ $23.00/ton 3,450.00 110 Ton Bituminous wear course @ $25.00/ton 2,750.00 40 Ton Class 2 aggregate for shouldering @ $15.00/ton 600.00 120 Ton Topsoil borrow @ $8.00/ton 960.00 1.6 Acre Seed w/mulch & fertilizer @ 1,200.00/acre 1,920.00 700 L.F. Silt fence @ $2.00/L.F. 700 L.F. Relocate gas main @ $14.00/L.F. 1,400.00 9.800.00 Subtotal $40,330.00 5% Contingency 2_ $42,350.00 + 30% Indirect Cost 12.710.00 Total Sanitary Sewer $55,060.00 49548.rpt to\ APPENDIX B - PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL WATERVIEW ADDITION SANITARY SEWER &WATER MAIN EXTENSIONS PROJECT NO. 666 I. Sanitary Sewer A. Lateral Benefit Assessable Parcel Description Footage Rate/FY, Total Section 36 Parcel 020-06 70 $17.80 $ 1,246.00 Parcel 021-27 ` 400 17.80 7.120.00 Total $8,366.00 B. Tink Area Total Pond Street Assessable Rate Total Parcel Description Area Credit Credit Area Acre,Lot Section 36 (acre) (acre) (acre) Parcel 010-07 0.6 0.6 $1,540 $ 924 Parcel 010-51 4.6 20% 3.7 1,540 5,698 Parcel 010-82 8.7 20% 7.0 1,540 10,780 Parcel 020-06 5.8 3.3 2.5 1,540 3,850 Parcel 020-51 4.7 20% 3.8 1,540 5,852 Parcel 021-27 6.3 2.3 20% 3.2 1,540 4,928 Parcel 021-79 8.2 1.4 20% 5.4 1,540 8,316 Parcel 022-79 0.9 0.1 0.8 1,540 1,232 Parcel 030-28 0.9 0.9 1,540 1,386 Parcel 040-28 4.6 3.7 1,540 5,698 Parcel 050-27 1 lot 1 Lot 740 740 Parcel 050-28 4.3 20% 3.4 1,540 5,236 Parcel 060-27 1.1 0,4 0.7 1,540 1,078 Parcel 070-27 6.5 2.5 20% 3.2 1,540 4,928. DODD VIEW ADDITION Outlet A Parcel 02-004 2.8 2.8 1,540 4,312 Outlet'B Parcel 031-04 0.7 0.7 1,540 1,078 Outlet B Parcel 032-04 0.5 0.5 1,540 770 Outlet B Parcel 033-04 1.7 1.7 1,540 2,618 Oudot C Parcel 04-004 2.9 2.9 1,540 4,466 Lot 1 Block 1 1 Lot 1 Lot 740 740 Lot 1 Block Z 1 Lot 1 Lot 740 740 Lot 2 Block 2 1 Lot 1 Lot 740 740 Lot 3 Block 2 1 Lot 1 Lot 740 740 Lc4 4 Block 2 1 Lot 1 Lot 740 740 Lot 1 Block 3 1.4 • 1.4 1,540 2,156 Lot 2,3 Block 3 Parcel 032-03 1.7 1.7 1,540 2,618 Lot 1 Block 4 Li 1.1 1,540 1,694 MORONI ADDITION Lot 1 Block 1 3.0 3.0 1,540 4,620 Lot 2 Block 2 3.0 3.0 1,540 4,620 TOTAL 57.7 Ac $93,298 6 Lots 49548.n,t T�, • • II. Water Main A. Lateral Benefit Assessable Parcel Description Footage Rate/F.F. Total Section 36 Parcel 020-06 70 $15.80 $ 1,106.00 Parcel 021-27 400 15.80 6.320.00 Total $7,426.00 B. Trunk Area Total Pond Street Assessable Rate Total Parcel Description Area Credit Credit Area Acre,Lot Section 36 (acre) (acre) (acre) Parcel 010-07 0.6 0.6 4.6 $1,615 $ 969 Parcel 010-51 4 20% 3.7 1,615 5,976 Parcel 020-06 5.8 3.3 2.5 1,615 4,038 Parcel 020-51 4.7 20% 3.8 Parcel 021-27 6.3 2.3 20% 3.2 1,615 5,168 1,615 ,168 Parcel 030-28 0.9 � Parcel 040-28 0.9 1,615 1,453 4.6 3.7 1,615 5,976 Parcel 050-27 1 lot 1 Lot 775 775 Parcel 050-28 4.3 20% 3.4 1,615 5,491 Parcel 060-27 1.1 0.4 0.7 1,615 1,131 Parcel 070-27 6.5 2.5 20% 3.2 DODD VIEW ADDITION 1,615 5,168 Outlot A Parcel 02-004 2.8 2.8 Outlot B Parcel 031-04 0.7 1,615 4,131 Outlot B Parcel 032-04 0.7 1,615 1,101 0.5 0.5 1,615 808 Outlot B Parcel 033-04 1.7 Outlot C Parcel 04-004 1. 1,615 2,746 2.9 2.9 9 1,615 5 4,684 Lot 1 Block 1 1 Lot 1 Lot Lot 1 Block 2 1 Lot 775 775 1 Lot 775 775. Lot 2 Block 2 1 Lot 1 Lot 775 775 Lot 3 Block 2 1 Lot 1 Lot 775 775 Lot 4 Block 2 1 Lot I Lot Lot 1 Block 3 1.4 775 775 Lot 2,3 Block 3 Parcel 032-03 1.7 1.7 1,615 2,741 Lot 1 Block 4 1.7 1,615 2,746 1.1 1.1 1,615 1,777 MORONI ADDITION Lot 1 Block 1 3.0 3.0 1,615 4,845 Lot 2 Block 2 3.0 3.0 1,615 4 845 TOTAL 44.5 Ac $76,522 6 Lots 49548.rpt K 14 • SUMMARY PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL WATERVIEW ADDITION SANITARY SEWER &WATER MAIN EXTENSIONS PROJECT NO. 666 Sanitary Sewer Water Main Parcel Lateral Trunk Lateral Trunk Description Benefit Area )3enefct tal Parcel 010-07 924 969 1,893 Parcel 010-51 5,698 5,976 11,674 Parcel 010-82 10,780 10,780 Parcel 020-06 1,246 3,850 1,106 4,038 10,240 Parcel 020-51 5,852 6,137 11,989 Parcel 021-27 7,120 4,928 6,320 5,168 23,536 Parcel 021-79 8,316 8,316 Parcel 022-79 1,232 1,232 Parcel 030-28 1,386 1,453 2,839 Parcel 040-28 5,698 5,976 11,674 Parcel 050-27 740 775 1,515 Parcel 050-28 5,236 5,491 10,727 Parcel 060-27 1,078 1,131 2,209• Parcel 070-27 4,928 5,168 10,096 DODD VIEW ADDITION Outlot A Parcel 02-004 4,312 4,522 8,834 Outlot B Parcel 031-04 1,078 1,131 2,209 Outlot B Parcel 032-04 770 808 1,578 Outlot B Parcel 033-04 2,618 2,746 5,364 Outlot C Parcel 04-004 4,466 4,684 9,150 Lot 1 Block 1 740 775 1,515 Lot 1 Block 2 740 775 1,515 Lot 2 Block 2 740 775 1,515 Lot 3 Mock 2 740 775 1,515 Lot 4.Block 2 740 775 1,515 Lot 1 Bock 3 2,156 2,261 4,417 Lot 2,3 Block 3 Parcel 032-03 2,618 2,746 5,364 Lot 1 Block 4 1,694 1.777 3.471 MORONI ADDITION Lot 1 Block 1 4,620 4.845 9,465 Lot 2 Block 2 4,620 4,845 9.465 TOTAL 8,366 93,298 7,426 76,522 185,612 • 49548.mt 1 S 1 V I I II, ,■ EN PROP! /��/ ``/"J us WATE° EW �.��1 ,�:�'�= ' , 'd!1 ADD , ON ►bI/�lli' , 4•,- � ■ P P■V141111,1114wr 4 # ill ----ThrlifP' At Q lt‘� 1:12°-28 -ROPOS '� �: 040-27 8" SANITARY S ER qk o,°-so o.o-te F� — - _ ./ /WATER MAIN oi-- PROPOSEDr. _ l* 7 vuroj, 2 WATERVIEW 'k r ' �' 'V mu ADO(TION i' AREA C 'i314.,_' °T ? ' !��I' `a , oso-te sb o6.0 Y 022_,„:„. [„..., sAL s s...,._ . FA0t0-51 . ,� v `t,3� 1 zit 010-s, 1 1 :d - ... t.... _�� 0,c7---75 s t l�?1= 111 30i. �Ar oto-et - a k ►-i i + • rd�" 014-7g LOT LAYOUT r 1I '�, • , Y i 1 r��� ♦ ` ��� •tg 7g t ri well Et -44 t--'-, sC e is■ v , 015-75 -..1 I 5 .1.:47 • FUTURE ►.._.,_.._. r; E;J . .44 - � : FUTURE �:. it 020-51 Z .. /Ii r,_ . 4 4 MI is SEWER t AREA A 1. A: 021-79 ' © RD j U CLUB ROAD 1 g 0 Y �� EA B A A STATION FUTURE � SEWER ,,: „.:cp,:t?„..,..:..::::'•.''. AREA B 010-77 1 2 t "' x z m s 7 1 - .....,,,,„,,IfFnei G ..,..v.:, i 0 AREA D 'R^xy 4 . rt ?r 010-01 .: f':' s Pt o,t-ss °'0-78 ;' 0 L a...:: . � .: '., �� ..dad? • .7. '! ■0 300 °°° LEGEND • Sane In bet Service Area Boundary OPTION A T.H. 3 UTILITY EXTENSION w/AREA B SERVED BY GRAVITY n Bonestroo Rosene ITI EAGAN, MINNESOTA FIGURE 2 Associates A t d es WATERVIEW ADDITION, CITY PROJ. No. 666 49548F01.DWG NOVEMBER 1993 COMM. 49548 �� 1 11, IIIf�. I ' %# riw ' NIP". ■ PR0- s;,. i i 1 ADD 0 ►'ii��I�I�r �..a�t •al • ...* 111111 Pleriefiffprziiiptit •.:7. 0/4■4‘4100,, I. t• . .... ........ . iiiiiiihNso.zajlIP.4-nikirtirlitir al,47*47,4p,i-sikth,781 al * 020-20 : '? 7 ', /:MY o,0-50 r P�OR�5ED ao-s" 030-20 iffir - 1r' �'. ®"!ice ilia S SAIViT SEWER I. ,/• + �, '\''.'t .�� �/ - • w/WATER „ /% ./► i AREA C If _ ''' :,: 022 i ® \IIRNI gi .030—'� 4t +i .z 0"' es. 3. t . r......r :�t 010 7S �; .' �.: .. .j�•i.:f g: O,0-Sf 1T 'vs t3 III 3 '4j a 010-!2 aca 1 L01 1{OUT 4 jar" ♦ -- NO�� .18-T6 ' Ir", 0 r x' .. 015-7S ' I ...'' - 11111[11111 - ilk ,),.. i ,...-4- tf .: 'I FVNRE 116 A ;E -,- rde.rrr �' SEWER 02 A C "T/ .1 AREA AI. i s. ,, 1. Aw :021-'7!{ ..IIIILI MI 1 r 1 .,7-76 0,e-70 � . ; � 1 ti M •N E 1 1 1. 010-52 ° ',. .�-,� a �Nr* e^ ., re I . A A 1 ,r,' -EA B 1 FVNRE >£ 1 SEWER < 1 ",' .),. AREA 8 1' Al. 010-77 o AREA D km , .,I 1. 1 k 1 3 � . • 1 010 , 1 ' - 1 4: ri y; ' 4 010-70 012-55 „1 1 Q10-57 r� ' : .... . fi 030-S, K 'a s �.. )'fi. yyCg.k=.�.:} fF :tt —�- Mob.M —ML- .�--�sr�� .3iY.v � s.3f... � .:.' •s az�:•....v.{ '',e,YCZ �a`�'i g'x>��l a° '°° LEGEND Seek In ' IrrarnernOM Service Area Boundary TION... . DODD RD. UTILITY EXTENSION w/AREA B SERVED BY LIFT STATION g:::?°° Anderlik d EAGAN, MINNESOTA FIGURE 3 Associates 1NATERVIEW ADDITION, CITY PROJ. No. 666 49548F01.DWG NOVEMBER 1993 COMM. 49348 [l . LATERAL BENEFIT ASSESSMENT PROPOSED ASSESSABLE FOOTAGE i1Rllommii I>Emorm IWATERVIEW t ADDITION illth 11111111rhan 4 4 /I Ex. 8" w. / q-1 ■■A %%■■ .. it IA%020-28 O , o° 040-27 IPii _ PROPOSED 030-27 ASSESSABLE 474 '' SA ITARY SEWER• _._. rill FOOTAGE � w�WATER MAI N 030-28 alr ' i1 'PROJECT 666 040-28 ,! 14 �050-28 X20 0610 022-08 Is 2 i 1817 ; -07-0-75"--- ----tEt)"_ 010-51 ;A116 1L14 13 12 •�e-ee v t_ • A•� OLD T l 1 010-82 ' il 1 1 1 --1 t I 1 i �� 1 i r`��� . \- Future 075-75 ei 1 G 016-76 N ASSESSABLE 8" Sewer Jacking POSSIBLE FUTURE FOOTAGE under T.H. 3 & C.P. Rail LOT LAYOUT To serve Area B NO SCALE mrmitinammumminm P Ex. POWER POLE T.N. 13 — �C Variable — 20' to 40' South Lone North Lone 12, 12' 12' jtar RECONSTRUCT Ex. GAS t 10 s MAIN BY OTHERS . .__,..1..e... .-!•1111 ----� SILT FENCE PROPOSED I JERSEY BARRIER FOR CONS-RUCTION 92y 26 REMOVE/RECONSTRUCT o Ex. BITUMINOUS SHOULDER AND GUARDRAIL PROPOSED 8" I ._._10. 27' WATER MAIN PROPOSED 8" :915 SAN. SEWER T.H. 3 UTILITY EXTENSION Bonestroo Rosene vi EAGAN, MINNESOTA FIGURE 4 A Associates 6 WATERVIEW ADDITION CITY ABeociates , ITV PROD. No. 666 49548F01.DWG NOVEMBER 1993 COMM. 49548 111111bitt ii. . ..i!,',#,Vititk, 4* 411P44k I,' •-' Ili ab • iikribiikp,,s4"44§1--4.1 02641 i 7am a3e-xr ate` �., � � ,�� .r. . ViILt : t MI, at "41:4" le. or 11.1'd 4411.1 ,F;E:p.rAt,kt,..,.—.1.b.:A.,,,p, sq, „.. ,k i .;:r^^ 411° y AO% All ILI," all ,... � • C d S Bf3 f � " .* i ; ligs 46 _ �yiJvnJ ;4" if/45'1/44-+�j �.�. �..{�. II err Rooto -- .'": Y r b:z r 3 yY 7,C a .010'75 or I, ,y ,-nb: £ l3M�.,..,- 1 -6# .r.,:kp Akio,. t.,.,.54, .,.4-......-.. I N , sus 7sxn' � =1.4.--:::.....*-di lei ini 1 ..'31"I 1 113 0. /� 'w rt 'd It t.. A 1,x� Sit t x -46 , ° e • xt t ;rrti,Ai•7.7 tam tM 1 `"`° 031.03 wa►s Elmo M, b414,400,7 a. a. `( , all:/4..einaii ., al 1111=1,44144 il.,i,- Tffiliti itilltiiip*,‘ \ 444,.. ligiiTD-d1► V 119 s .. A1$ "4 vole EN - :..;;::4:r: ,,,p1r4P.PrArt-l'. raio , 6 . 10 111111k, 411i .ist�."iii,s ,:v.7 s _1}� 'a• ,>: r6- �} 14. � ''f . .�'.brE .,..„.•:,.•_W4"•k7$ ,AMY-. - t =''' r�,4 ' 1 _I• }', '"'4`��•i` ,y! .M.d' ' - . '#'•''',1"'.***-' :wa ,.. ten"u•.«"711B:suk. (if R,..7R Qth75 �� I kl ;TStfY4flifiliMtai. ,ft?07, c.„..... ". .. ...), ,......„.;.„.„,....., " ....,....../. ,..,.,.. ..., . ..,... ,,, . ....„.......,,..„ •.• i yy 2* ,.1•4,i .k. r. S¢`' , :„, x �- SANITARY SEWER AREA •9*Fir Y{4. Wi:'' 1 —.1 ..� 011,,111 ' 0163 _ °r �� Y",• Sean i1 M$ w : . m u TRUNK AREA ASSESSMENT Bonestroo Rosene • Andertik b EAGAN,, MINNESOTA FIGURE 3 Associates WATERVIEW ADDmON, CITY PRO No. 666 • 49548F03.DWC NOVEMBER t993 • , COMM. 49548 Agenda Information Memo December 21, 1993 City Council Meeting UNITED STATIONERS ADDITION/PRELIMINARY PLAT CONDITIONS A. Reconsider Conditions of Preliminary Plat,United Stationers--Representatives of United Stationers have once again requested reconsideration of condition #8 for its approved preliminary plat of United Stationers Addition. Condition#8 originally read"Meadowview Road is required to be upgraded in accordance with City Code requirements." As the staff report on pages through indicates, the City Council approved an amendment to this condition at its last meeting whereby Meadowview Road would not be upgraded at this time but the applicant would agree to waive their right to object to future assessments associated with the upgrading of the road. United Stationers apparently did not understand the implications of this revised condition and they now object to it. They have requested an opportunity to have this condition reconsidered once again. Background information on this request is included in the staff report. If the conditions are agreed upon under Old Business, the final plat can then be approved as the first item under New Business. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny a revision to the preliminary plat conditions for United Stationers Addition. l s, MEMO #a TO: PEGGY REICHERT, DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT FROM: MIKE RIDLEY, PROJECT PLANNER DATE: DECEMBER 16, 1993 SUBJECT: CONDITIONS OF PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVAL UNITED STATIONERS ADDITION United Stationers Supply Company has again approached the City with a request to amend condition on #8 of Conditions of Preliminary Plat Approval. •,Following is a chronological summary of events leading to this request: • May 23. (991 • Staff requested, and City Council authorized, the preparation of a feasibility,report for Project 615 (Meadow View Road) -Streets and Utilities. • Auger 20. 1991 A public hearing NW for PrOject 615. Affected property owners, Including;'United Stationers, object and the City Council denies the project with direction to staff to revise the feasibaty report and renotice all affected property owners for a new public hearing. • July 15. 1993-R.L.Johnson submits a Prellirdriary Plat application. United Stationers Supply Comp y's 150,000 sq.ft. covers 32.5%of their 10.5 acre lot. Future expansion needs will exceed the City's maximum lot coverage allowed in the light Industrial district of 35% Therefore, United Stationers negotiates purchase of adjacent property to increase allowed building coverage for expansion. • Speer SeMenter 21,1 . The C ncdi approves the Preliminary Plat for United Stationers Addition • #8. "Meadow View Road is required to be upgraded in accordance with: Code requirements". • November 15. 1933 • R.L. Johnson submits letter on behalf of United Stationers requesting an amendment to conditions ons 2 and 8. • December 7. 1993 •The City Council approves the revised conditions s as presented in staff's memo. 2q • December 14. 1993 - United Stationers requests a complete waiver of any condition regarding the upgrade of Meadow View Road. United Stationers Supply Company contends that nothing has changed since the Meadow View Road Project#615 was denied in 1991 and tying this plat to an upgrade that will not benefit them because they do not take access from Meadow View Road is unfair. In addition, United Stationers is unwilling to agree to a compromise of waning their right to object to an assessment that has yet to be calculated as approved on December 7, 1993 by the City Council. The purpose of this land acquisition and replatting of property is to allow United Stationers Supply Company future expansion of the existing building which will result in a more intense use of their property. The Public Works Department feels strongly that this street upgrade should occur as part of this platting request or the applicant should agree to waive their right to appeal assessments associated with the future upgrade of Meadow View Road. At this time, the City Council has the following options available: 1. To approve the original condition of requiring the upgrade of Meadow View Road in accordance with City Code requirements. 2. To approve the current condition of waiving the upgrade of Meadow View Road provided United Stationers Supply Company agrees to execute and record a waiver to appeal future assessments associated with the upgrade of same. 3. To waive condition #8 in its entirety. If you have any further questions, please do not hesitate to contact me. 44_ Project Planner MR/js • • cp:( oo r ".. try •. ! ## * •► ./{ ! ,+ t ... {ii 1.alit ti' //� / '// `•�„ jet#i I e+`..:,% l . �11 T �, ! i s C .. l i�+ )1, i/> # 1 / •.1 / I , 6 ►! ,S. ow* , 1 tt♦ r •�J►� #I!i'J' /ill //0144!"1 Ji in '-,:0-. :. . ‘`'‘‘it i :� y I o-- 'h1 / ' k. t/. # ,. t 11 . ``s y / ♦ ,E�' {) t" 1414 .r •i+;1414 n 'Y t a 1414 ,////:I/ ' w+r4r.rp•+....+.r....+ ,, °. ,}'7'. wi�a sa..e w.ar.aA. 41A..... -tut.- -aner. ! } . ._ _ - J / I .t I t; `•�:�.�. jJ� ,p4.14.- If sr } c 500,:, ,' T A. f r 4..'1414 ra/ 1414 `" k►, 1414%. , l ° s r/ 4'/ w� # / wI I/ I s •. y w !t • .'/I l y` ..• ''` ,e.. "'�: o". r '+ ;Y% � I «()1414.,•+►■ �fl� ,� . ; • •1,,i- • ; Agenda Information Memo May 23, 1991, City Council Meeting • AU'T'HORIZE FEASIBILITY REPT/MEADOWVIEW RD Q. Project 615, Authorize Feasibility Report (Meadowview Road • Street & Utilities)-- Presently, Meadowview Road is a gravel surfaced roadway from TH13 west to Fort Snelling State Park servicing the R.L Johnson and Meadowview Additions near the intersection of Four Oaks Road with TH 13. This roadway has been identified in the draft 5-year CIP plan as being upgraded in 1991. Recently, staff has received comments from adjacent property owners regarding concerns associated with uncontrolled surface water drainage runoff and the related erosion of the gravel road surface. Subsequently, staff is requesting Council authorization to prepare a detailed feasibility report identifying the public improvements necessary to bring this up to City standards along with the estimated cost and method of financing the appropriate improvements. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: Authorize the preparation of a feasibility report for Project 615 (Meadowview Road - Streets & Utilities). SETTLEMENT AGMT/ASSMT APPEAL/NELSON R. Settlement Agreement, Project 466, Assessment Appeal (Nelson)--As a result of an assessment appeal certified with District Court, the City and the property owner have -reviewed the proposed improvements in relationship to the benefit to the property and have reached a settlement the day before the case was scheduled for hearing by District Court. Enclosed on page is a Resolution authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to enter into and execute the Settlement Agreement on behalf of the City of Eagan. This Settlement Agreement has been prepared by the City Attorney's Office and reviewed by the Public Works Department and found to be in order for favorable Council action. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the Resolution authorizing the execution of a settlement agreement for Project 466 Assessment Appeal (Nelson). 1 ► �PAGE S FAistlCIT COUNCIL `, 'k Mayor Eau iotrodotoad this hwy. aft its4 idosc bear far peeled.60,Meadesn ew Road R lair. l� N ci 1't os, d oa the locat100, the y1; "he the e d ass ume the proposed.'to be ass ed. of of Y icasibsiby c Warts Cart and that' so a!` eiaeta had bees banded ha the bit. .' � 3° 'Memor l gUway.were represented by Oak daughter and all the bit iii t aeee+ss en Terminal Die and woodered why Meadowviesr Road seeded to be u ade i!and why it to'be deae awer. rat Public Wry Cobest said that became Medsd to isa road,it iilbec ieiiri difficult as a sway, to sial�tsua. The Clty has evahuted ice prioritized s8 the strests in the rettaimi*lty and bared upon.eadipl and asahnteaaac a costs, b bd a�ated: It is one tithe i du is Bops that is p:avrei• iefersses tad *asset di sed.'?lie current uaderlyis the asaa ie l idustrist dreetar ed, Yorks$olbert said there are ao deferments available other the Light or citizen a r. ; would be which would defer r a portion of the Oadtarorthy's tomtit the ► t asd bent use. Mr.Dave Schneider, Ling United Stathe ,floc*dad to the tot`Meadowelevw ss aeit •seeded. ' hat peaieted ots that�` : bad sat Wasted any eases to the aty to elides the road. for of Works Colbert that:fie rat-e�tirsy was Scanted wish tits piattina s ed property. Addit onar y,t it ►Sheldon that eau and riibt-ada►�ay acquisition.mats a a t eif the prat asid the star bearing. Mr.Da se Reese,who Svett err the east side of littoral yS asked P be.ras Included is the prat and vat told his prtpei s Included Ala the state sewer seam mess» ' "y d,Di recta cat Public Works Colbert said additional alternatives d be poked at d a col de sac,hocp d&straws'deist sso r e sett boeisgs; .'h said the method of been dot to determine end that as wont l also be ..T� *geed*bare t tams to a .s dad einatiom lads stsd a sew study. t3tist spa s dbattthe pa c i be dosed sad staff dire tut to prepare a smisad for P 61 itttoaehoe aw d(bets aid tltSitiesj. After coo:ideration,°"1111446 de ' . It t' . aid Wsedaer moved,Oustafsoe seconded, as motion so a the public and deny Project Meesdt Road (Streets and Utilities)with direstion to staff to revise the_feasibil tY #HOC this erect alter presentation to the aty , tae alt alk4ted propatdiomen for sitter i is� t �Yt r:� . ll J;Tree AAt EtainsfpECLll<AYZCn,,N CI DEEA ,T woollier mom„,ter p . eh aa.t a tioa to S paac aomde rti o of the Pia 4' Declaration of Default at b ' EAGAN CITY COUNCIL MINUTES SEPTEMBER 21, 1993 115111? a 1. These standard conditions of plat approval as adopted by Council action on February 2.1993,shall be complied with: A1.91,152,83,114,Cl,Q C3, El,,F1,Of,and Hi prior to 2. The� site shall be removed and the shed located along Alexander Road shall be relocated Meadow/view Road. plat shall dedicate 60' of right-of-way &entered over existing Alexander Road and 4. The final plat shall provide a drainage and utility ailment fora future storm sewer line that will divert the flow from the existing 48'line along the north edge of this site to Pond CP-8. S. Detailed grading, drainage and erosion control plans,utility layout plans, and site plans shall be submitted for further review by City staff and City Council before any building expansion can occur oe this site. 6. The drainage from the proposed development is required to be directed to Pond CP-8. 7. The development is required to upgrade the existing parking lot to current City Code requirements. I. Meadowview Road is required to be upgraded in aedordinte with City Code requirements 9. Since the property has already been platted,there Is no path dedication requirement. 10.There Is no trails dedication requirement with this plat. 11.A cash water quality dedication for the site will be required and will be based on the difference in Impervious coverage of the site between existing and future conditions. 12.The developer must demonstrate compliance with the Wetland Conservation Act prior to preliminary plat approval. This will include hiring a qualified wetlands consultant to determine the status of the possible to the southwest of the existing building. 13.An easement across the developer's property sufficient to allow re-routing of the storm sewer along Alexander Road to Pond CP-8 should be required as a condition of plat. 14. Future expansion plans for United Stationers are to be reviewed and required to meet Tree Reservation Guidelines • immimminiimmmilmil■krgitk.,v. s • R r ® � •• t�MlNCIMt lid +. IRE F a ' - cOHsTmJcTIOW MA11A $T fiber 15, 1993 x{ NOY 17 993 www. �w.� 3830?gat w w �w •r MN 55122-1897 RE: TFED 1"Ailizo RS ADDITION fi Dear ldrkyor Egan& Members: K.1..fohn y requessts that i:mididons t$and 88 of the preliminary plat mkpmfal be opened for tecotishletathrkk at dre-*Mies'available cramcil mestirt I f Condition 112 addresses Ilse removal of a image and shed f the c ite. This has always been United Stathmers intent Their Diner 4 the property is to upon the Tamil pt being filed at the county so that the closing may cccee: Therefore,'#wenbl be prude*to proceed with*hi*ital.the llool Pkt ter the Piot to the final plat. To sstisfy the ciottnoll. utt ibis totraticat will be ma,we WOO itirettt.w lea in ter sr die Oty of Baran the colt at this demolitito worlr. CkssatkIn 8 remdrinlvforsdewAriew Rosa to be urkmadetseenur to be a peripheral issue beat atkkessed outside this ' **big Isom.. 'rim central e 'this plat is a kit "" and a subseque t land porclmrse hi circler to rilow fcir f ; with zoning R. L Jdmscm Company and United Stationets �y. in-the:tante Meadowview Road'may be scheduled for itirpov.fertwrits and neaesemy be • We look forward to heating from you regardift this moat, '' ".1•7'''' „ 't tirades a Yon g t, • •mf OttcAYU*0 . •c t tkt� T5 : iilr + FAX: _city of eagan • • • IL MEMO TO: PEGGY REICHERT, DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT FROM: MIKE RIDLEY, PROJECT PLANNER • DATE: DECEMBER 2, 1993 SUBJECT: UNITED STATIONERS ADDITION PROPOSAL: R.L Johnson Companies, on behalf of United Stationers Supply, has requested an amendment to Conditions 2 and 8 of the approved Preliminary Plat for the above-referenced project. Condition #2: The garage on-site shall be removed and the shed located along Alexander Road shall be relocated prior to Final Plat approval." United Stationers Supply will not have ownership of the property until the Final Plat is recorded at Dakota County. United Stationers Supply is agreeable to a compromise whereby the structures will be removed within 120 days of Final Plat approval or prior to the City issuing any building permits for this property, whichever comes first. Condition #8: `Meadowview Road is required to be upgraded in accordance with City Code requirements." Meadowview Road is an unimproved public street. Staff places conditions requiring upgrades of streets as a condition of plat approval whenever a plat abuts an unimproved street. Because this platting process involves only a land transfer, (although future expansion of the existing building is likely), United Stationers Supply would like the City Council to waive this condition. An alternative to requiring the street upgrade with platting would be for United Stationers Supply to execute a document in a recordable format which would waive the property owner's right to object to future costs associated with the upgrade of Meadowview Road. C " ' A :� Y I r. lON TO , ,'. .: ''. '- .8 .:/ . : ' , to t o pry P�# 2. tit be days Of Fif18! Pit f ' this roper ► i : y �� t rto U ner's Supply assess a �. , ,- .tom' tip f `9 assessments k k R : • �4 i ,,„ x'r y�i 1 ; rs e .i - _ s_ t .-J r y $',.`1 a ] `. b s. 1. :7;'om,kc r e�-. ..� -. ,�x _,. ... Agenda Information Memo December 21, 1993 City Council Meeting IEW BUSINESS• FINAL PLAT/UNITED STATIONERS A. Final Plat, United Stationers Addition—Approval of this final plat for R.L. Johnson, Company is contingent upon resolution of the roadway improvement requirements set forth in the preliminary plat. If this item is satisfactorily resolved between the petitioner and the City Council under Old Business at the Council meeting December 21, the final plat can then be approved, subject to compliance of the final resolution of the roadway improvement conditions. Fo ,copy of the final plat as it appears for filing at Dakota County, please refer to page ' ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the final plat for United Stationers Addition. i Z O Q t / X Q ��� . :t CC . �Ar '' w A. Z 'j ` �� O :7:,M / ti;; -..,, d 'craw'..r"rr f. , 1-..._ V/ . - V . ILI • _ _� f f / / A I At f441:a ' AO / V '4 4 171 4 0 t. .a' - • I f ii i i rk ,./''°.....' I � !' ` 44,4\ i _fiii ,,#,/,. • 1 Iii // `� ��\ \ f.... .1... \,... W s i jQ5 ' r� , X il \?.,' ,..iL‘... .. \ 1. 4 t \\ / .\ \ \\,,,,,,,,,‘ . N.....\\:.. N \ X41 -1‘11. \ 4. . .....4—1 I I 3 X,s\ .N44S. / 1/, . • . _ 5 ; _joi N' . N • ■ ....... ci P . . Agenda Information Memo December 21, 1993 City Council Meeting DUPLEX LOT SPLIT/LOT 9,BLOCK 5, VIENNA WOODS ADDITION B. Duplex Lot Split, Custom Design Builders, located at Lot 9, Block 5, Vienna Woods Addition,NE 1/4 of Sec 31 (2043/2045 Vienna Lane)—Staff report on this requested waiver of plat for a duplex lot split is enclosed on pages)pa through (n( . ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny a waiver of plat for a duplex lot split on Lot 9, Block 5, Vienna Woods at 2043/2045 Vienna Lane, subject to the conditions set forth in the staff report. SUBJECT: WAIVER OF PLAT/DUPLEX LOT SPLIT APPLICANT: CUSTOM DESIGN BUILDERS LOCATION: LOT 9, BLOCK 5, VIENNA WOODS NE QUARTER SECTION 31 EXISTING ZONING: PD (PLANNED DEVELOPMENT) DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: DECEMBER 21, 1993 DATE OF REPORT: DECEMBER 15, 1993 COMPILED BY: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT APPLICATION SUMMARY: An application has been submitted requesting a Waiver of Nat for a duplex lot split to allow individual ownership. The proposed duplex will be located at 2043/2045 Vienna Lane (P.LD. #10-81950-090-05) and will meet all building setback requirements. Currently,there is one sanitary sewer and one water service available - to serve this lot. The applicant must provide an additional sewer and water service to serve the proposed parcel A. If approved, this Waiver of Plat shall be subject to the following: 1. The applicant must record the Waiver of Plat Resolution with Dakota County within 60 days of approval with documentation provided to the City. 2. All standard R-2 duplex setback requirements shall be met. 3. Both units shall be served by individual sewer and water services. /� _7t p I NEADOlKAAO .i. W a C* I Tk7:-Vr/.'...-T 6.'"" ''''...... 0 l '0.17 .. - .11'.', '!'!.Liti:.> i ' to A sw 1.,.._._0141 :‘!..1 , 7 g - i \ 014. 0'rr N IL , -, 1-,--.-„,„ , nil, @el's; 1 ` r ti.-- lib '4'' 0 j . t".: IAM rit =�,rf"• � art / I'• i� _ ` �, f c40 1• 1 viamr R PT 8,-oacsiota it.$1111/.11$ R }�„ ® 4. Pt MANNA M.Y 1 te/ q•Man t 1 I . _ l ' $: " R "1:117t a : � •IO R p pd i �� a. sae K� { W/ T 4 • ti — T z 0 N N us OW .- sym �o S .r i'l 5F " E ie W ri ou j �� •o z * i..°. id I-2 Z Z O. °Lw WD 0 = � imams U- b 12. iii i IS ' "....11.......111111111111# CO O W V W 'y s g CC ems-.. !i oo e u re o_.M J W a W W JOIi.WO VW NW¢ f o WR . T r-. LU ` CC 6w v 1 S a ¢<2 ,Q lQ < , OP °:°N ` WQ n.. r W . _ CO Is gyp`- i.iLi'.e WWO-CO C.. gii.-- .+ si' OO?Wm•- 1 =e..1 •".tY.u:n 11 II II J a r�= gl _��I W tr •Y,: low L._, Cl) f Lqi if. 7i=5„ItI4 a. C. fg '. x !'111.:3 emu' iL WIZ MO =i vigil Iii 11 i 8 r m 4 w..' 4 t.4 I 01. : 1 bh p}►' \ C • 3 r u. r« 3 i *"�' _LL w: i�■wa �;� :-t N �ry - °e•sa••. �. N 4t'. /1.Z 201N 0% y �; i t 'a s Th `•r -1 < (f1' 00'01: If 1 W 0 ♦t i F O =ji Z a I 1- ■.• a a I z=f < W=d.z. W F W a O t9,0 i �)1 g c Wv Agenda Information Memo December 21, 1993 City Council Meeting CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT/PANINO'S OF EAGAN C. Conditional Use Permit, Panino's of Eagan, to allow on-sale liquor,32 beer or wine in a CSC (Community Shopping Center) district within the Eagan Heights Commercial Park Planned Development on Lot 1,Block 1,Town Centre 100 Sixth Addition,located along the east side of Denmark Avenue, south of Town Centre Drive in the N 1/2 of Sec 15—The Advisory Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on this proposed conditional use permit at its meeting of November 23, 1993. The commission recommended approval of the conditional use permit subject to the conditions set forth in the staff report. The Planning Commission minutes and the staff report are enclosed on pagesVt).3through f7. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny a conditional use permit for an on-sale liquor, 3.2 beer or wine, for Panino's of Eagan within the Eagan Heights Commercial Park. MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF TEE EAGAN ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION EAGAN, MINNESOTA NOVEMBER 23, 1993 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT • PANINO'S OF EAGAN Chairman Voracek opened the first public hearing of the evening regarding a Conditional Use Permit to allow on-sale liquor, 3.2 beer or wine in a CSC (Community Shopping Center) district within the Eagan Heights Commercial Park Planned Development on Lot 1, Block 1, Town Centre 100 Sixth Addition located along the east side of Denmark Avenue south of Town Centre Drive in the north 1/2 of Section 15. City Planner Sturm introduced this item to the Commission. He stated that the applicant is proposing a Class I restaurant in Town Centre on a site currently occupied by New Horizon Daycare. Mr. Sturm described the proposed restaurant as a 5,000 sq. ft. building with a seating capacity of approximately 150 people. He further stated that the applicant currently has two other locations in the Twin City area, namely in Roseville and North Oaks. The applicant, Matthew A. Starr, gave a brief overview of the character of the proposed restaurant. Mr. Starr stated that the restaurant is similar to a Chilis, Applebees or TGI Fridays restaurant. He further stated that it will have an approximately 150 person seating capacity and an anticipated $1.3 million volume, 80% Page 2/EAGAN ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES NOVEMBER 23, 1993 of which will be food volume. Mr. Starr stated that the restaurant will cater to the family. Member Merkley inquired as to the status of available liquor licenses in the City of Eagan. Community Development Director Reichert explained that currently 18 liquor licenses are available, 15 of which are issued and 3 reserved for hotel or motel businesses. She noted the Council recently released one of the 3 reserved hotel/motel liquor licenses. She further noted that the number of available liquor licenses may not be increased until the year 2000 when the U.S. Census is released unless the Minnesota legislature in the meantime passes special legislation granting the City of Eagan additional licenses. She stated that City staff is currently in contact with a state legislator who may sponsor a bill for 5 additional licenses for the City. In response to Member Hoeft's question regarding the -process to obtain the one released liquor license, Community Development Director Reichter stated that the Council made no promise to the applicant for said liquor license. Member Hoeft questioned Mr. Starr regarding the restaurant's intended use of the area which is currently a playground for the New Horizon Daycare. The applicant stated that it may use the area as an outdoor patio or leave it as a play area for the children of customers. Member Hoeft inquired as to whether a change in use will require the play area to revert back to required parking area. City Planner Sturm replied that if the use is retail, then the area may revert back to parking area. Reyl moved, Wallace seconded, the motion to approve a Conditional Use Permit to allow on-sale liquor, 3.2 beer or wine in a CSC (Community Shopping Center) district within the Eagan Heights Commercial Park Planned Development on Lot 1, Block 1, Town Centre 100 Sixth Addition located along the east side of Denmark Avenue south of Town Centre Drive in the north 1/2 of Section 15, subject to the following conditions: 1. This application must record this Conditional Use Permit with Dakota County and provide documentation to the City within 60 days of City Council approval. 2. All applicable City ordinances must be met. All present voted in favor. IpL( SUBJECT: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT APPLICANT: MATTHEW A. STARR DBA PANINO'S OF EAGAN LOCATION: NW QUARTER SECTION 15 3450 DENMARK AVENUE EXISTING ZONING: PLANNED DEVELOPMENT/COMMUNITY SHOPPING CENTER (PD/CSC) DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: NOVEMBER 23, 1993 DATE OF REPORT: NOVEMBER 9, 1993 COMPILED BY: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT APPLICATION SUMMARY: An application has been submitted requesting a Conditional Use Permit for on-sale liquor,3.2 beer or wine in a CSC district,in conjunction with a Class I restaurant to be located on Lot 1,Block 1, Town Centre 100 6th Addition, specifically at 3450 Denmark Avenue. APPLICABLE REGULATIONS: Chapter 11, Section 11.40, Subd. 4, Conditional Use Permits. PROPOSAL: The proposed site is currently occupied by New Horizon Day-care. The applicant is requesting a Conditional Use Permit for on-sale liquor, 3.2 beer or wine, for a 5,000 sq.ft.restaurant with seating for approximately 150 people and will employ 10-15 full- time and approximately 40 part-time persons. The applicant believes on-sale liquor is necessary to compete with area restaurants such as Applebee's and Chili's, but also states that the liquor service will be complimentary to the food service. The applicant anticipates a June 1994 opening date. The four existing Panino's restaurants are family owned and operated. Two have been operating for fifteen years in Colorado Springs, Colorado;two are in the Twin Cities area- one in Roseville for five years and one in North Oaks which opened in January of this year. PLANNING CONSIDERATIONS: This proposal is consistent with the seven standards identified in Section 11.40, Subd. 4. FINANCIAL OBLIGATION • Conditional Use Permit 15-CU•22-1143 There are levied assessments with an unpaid balance of$15,100 on this parcel. The financial obligation is subject to change based upon the areas and dimensions of the plat contained in the final plat Based upon the study of the financial obligations collected in the past and the uses proposed for the property, the following charges are proposed. The charges are computed using the City's current fee schedule and the connection and availability of the City's utility system based on the submitted plans. Improvement Use Rate Quantity Amount None 1 This financial obligation is presented for informational purposes. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: To approve/deny the Conditional Use Permit with the following conditions: 1. This applicant must record this Conditional Use Permit with Dakota County and provide documentation to the City within 60 days of City Council approval. 2. All applicable City ordinances must be met. • 1 ggl emu -»...-.:: SUJUIK ULN3D Nm°l •,,1°.: laf'1t 1Q r� 1{•��y�7ti t'k 'r' ' r. I a w Ivia et M r • N `, w O. 1 O. a. At O , I - '''°. ''' N :, - Z • •i :. �. 1 Q< •1• mg . .i e 0 I..• r _k •. ::r 1e—•— co Z , g .. i 0• LU a. o E :. t 111 .01113hal . 4'...- • 3 11:' 117. :"/ '-, ..----I --- • it -0 • :. . . . ,.. , . . if „ , . 1 im- • : . 7 v.:::: ' . . ,4: .:. . - •.•1./*... o*i•iiiiiiii•i ; Gli1.1111-1-1-[1]-1-11.0 1 1 • 1 3f1N3AM)11:1Y11N30 --.) ( . ,,,N ir._-....---... ............--1 1 . Agenda Information Memo December 21, 1993 City Council Meeting LIOUOR LICENSE/PANINO'S D. License, On-Sale Liquor, Panino's of Eagan, 3450 Denmark Drive—Enclosed on page is a letter received of Matthew Starr on behalf of Panino's of Eagan requesting that the review of the application for liquor license be temporarily postponed. Pursuant to the applicant's request, staff is recommending that the item be continued indefinitely. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To continue indefinitely consideration of an application by Panino's of Eagan for an on-sale liquor license for property located at 3450 Denmark Drive. • l 1.7V FROM LOTS-W-600-Wp 12. 16. 1993 12:32 P. 1 • • • Pest-W'brand fax transmittal memo 7671 1 y�3 is fi . 106 /667 .g/ • • December 16, 1993 John Stephenson • Cky of Eagan 3830 Pilot Icnob Rd Eagan,MN 5122 Dear Mr. Stephenson: • Due to some difficulties our soup is having in completing a lease agreement for a proposed restaurant in Town Centre Shopper, we are requesting that review of our application for a liquor license be.temporarily postponed until we are able to complete the lease. We will notify you, and the city of Eagan, when the lease is signed, and we are ready to procood. At which point, we will be happy to moot with you. Thank you Sincerely, /)2241,pr--A- Matthew A. Star Panino's of • • • • • • • • 1O°\ +sENOrs• Agenda Information Memo December 21, 1993 City Council Meeting ' ' u i v a./ L 1 V E. Waiver of Plat,Commonwealth Land lisle Insurance Company,to split a portion of Lot 14, Block 6,Woodgate 2dditn d it with , Block 6,Wood 2nd Addition located along the nd A west side io an of Hickorycombine Hill in the Lot SE 15 1/4 of Section gate 29--The Advisory Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on this proposed waiver at its meeting of November 23, 1993.The commission recommends approval of the waiver subject to the five conditions included in their minutes. The staff report on this matter is enclosed on pages through 111. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny a waiver of plat for Commonwealth Land Title Insurance Company affecting Lot 14, Block 6 and Lot 15,Block 6, Woodgate 2nd Addition, subject to the five conditions set forth in the Planning Commission minutes. l l'd Page 6/EAGAN ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES NOVEMBER 23, 1993 WAIVER OP PLAT - COMMONWEALTH LAND TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY Chairman Voracek opened the next public hearing of the evening regarding a Waiver of Plat in order to split a portion of Lot 14, Block 6, Woodgate 2nd Addition and combine it with Lot 15, Block 6, Woodgate 2nd Addition, located along the west side of Hickory Hill in the SE 1/4 of Section 29. City Planner Sturm stated that the applicant was seeking a waiver of plat to realign a common property line of Lots 4 and 15, Block 6, of Woodgate 2nd Addition. He further stated that Woodgate 2nd Addition was platted in 1974 and both subject lots have existing homes. He explained that as a result of a survey conducted this past summer, the property owners discovered the actual location of the property line was not where the property owners believed it to be. Mr. Sturm stated that there were no concerns regarding zoning issues. Martin Henschel, counsel to Commonwealth Land Title Insurance Company, stated that the property owners seek to match up the lots/ line with the actual occupancy of the property owners respective properties. Merkley moved, Heyl seconded, the motion to approve 'a Waiver of Plat in order to split a portion of Lot 14, Block 6, Woodgate 2nd Addition and combine it with Lot 15, Block 6, Woodgate 2nd Addition, located along the west side of Hickory Hill in the SE 1/4 of Section 29, subject to the following conditions: 1. The applicant must record this Waiver of Plat with Dakota County and provide documentation to the City within 60 days of City Council approval. 2. The applicant shall cause the execution of two separate lot combination agreements to be recorded at Dakota County to : legally attach the land exchange to each parcel. 3. The applicant shall vacate the 10' drainage and utility easement centered over the existing common lot line. 4. The applicant shall dedicate ten foot drainage and utility easements centered over all lot lines and, in addition, where necessary to accommodate existing or proposed utilities for drainage ways within the subject properties. The applicant shall dedicate easements of sufficient width and location as determined by engineering standards. tt. Page 7/EAGAN ADVISORY PLANNING COMIISSION MINUTES NOVEMBER 23, 1993 S. The applicant shall dedicate adequate drainage and ponding easements to incorporate the required high water elevation plus three feet as necessitated by storm water storage volume requirements. All present voted in favor. • SUBJECT: WAIVER OF PLAT (R•1 SINGLE FAMILY) APPLICANT: COMMONWEALTH LAND TITLE INSURANCE CO. LOCATION: SE QUARTER SECTION 29 1759/1761 HICKORY HILL EXISTING ZONING: PLANNED DEVELOPMENT (PD) DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: NOVEMBER 23, 1993 DATE OF REPORT: NOVEMBER 17, 1993 COMPILED BY: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT APPLICATION SUMMARY: An application has been submitted requesting a single family Waiver of Plat to realign the common property line of Lots 14 and 15, Block 6, Woodgate 2nd Addition, located at 1759/1761 Hickory Hill, respectively. APPLICABLE REGULATIONS: Chapter 13, Section 13.40, Subd. 3, Waivers. EXISTING CONDITIONS: Woodgate 2nd Addition was platted in 1974 and both lots contain existing homes with attached garages. PROPOSAL: Through a survey conducted this summer, the affected property owners discovered that the actual location of the boundary line was not where the parties understood it to be. Site improvements have been made based on the perceived location of the property line that,in reality,result in an encroachment from one property to the next. PLANNING CONSIDERATIONS: ° The proposed waiver is a mutually agreeable solution to both parties and will result in a minor land exchange that will not involve any additional development. In addition, the proposed lot line shift will not create any building setback deficiencies. o This proposal does not impact surrounding properties. • No grading will be necessary for the proposed Waiver of Plat. The drainage both in the front yard and the back yard will not be affected by this waiver. The new lot configuration will allow an existing wood retaining wall to be located all on Parcel A. UI • Sanitary sewer and watermain service will not be affected by the waiver. Each lot is currently served with City sewer and water service. • Access to Lots 14 and 15 will not be affected by the waiver. Each lot will continue to have their street access from Hickory Hill. • The proposed waiver of lot lines will require the vacation of the existing 7.5 foot easements on the old lot line, and the dedication of new 5 foot easements on both sides of the proposed lot line. PARK&TRAIL DEDICATION: This Waiver of Plat does not create a new lot. There are no park and trail dedication requirements. WATER QUALITY/WETLANDS: This proposed relocation of a lot line on two developed parcels will not result in any change in runoff characteristics of either parcel, so no water quality mitigation requirement will be recommended by staff. Each parcel contains a portion of Pond BP-22 (a pond classified for wildlife habitat in the City's Water Quality Plan) as well as the adjacent wetland fringe. However,no draining or filling of either the pond or the fringe is proposed,therefore staff will recommend a no-loss determination be made for wetlands on the site. FINANCIAL OBLIGATION •Waiver of Nat 29•W-9-10.9 , Lots 14 and 15,Block 6, Woodgate 2nd There are levied assessments with an unpaid balance of SO which will be allocated to the parcels created by this waiver of plat. The financial obligation is subject to change based upon the areas and dimensions of the plat contained in the final plat. Based upon the study of the financial obligations collected in the past and the uses proposed for the property, the following charges are proposed. The charges are computed using the City's current fee schedule and the connection and availability of the City's utility system based on the submitted plans. Improvement Use Rate Quantity Amount • None � ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: To approve/deny the Waiver of Plat subject to the following conditions: 1. The applicant must record this Waiver of Plat with Dakota County and provide documentation to the City within 60 days of City Council approval. 2. The applicant shall cause the execution of two separate lot combination agreements to be recorded at Dakota County to legally attach the land exchange to each parcel. 3. The applicant shall vacate the 10' drainage and utility easement centered over the existing common lot line. • 4. The applicant shall dedicate ten foot drainage and utility easements centered over all lot lines and, in addition, where necessary to accommodate existing or proposed utilities for drainage ways within the subject properties. The applicant shall dedicate easements of sufficient width and location as determined by engineering standards. 5. The applicant shall dedicate adequate drainage and ponding easements to incorporate the required high water elevation plus three feet as necessitated by storm water storage volume requirements. • IJ ft, .�... - -- 6101►Y aYI YY•w••• . _ j t\ I� a • .• Y •a ' f • t• i i .4 I • a a �. A D 1 TIO as . tt v. a ta ... . ,/ I i A- i' f f t. A Mt lb `R •- „ '♦ f • rte 1 116� C .t.. tf IF::‘'t Yj''�E' 7•,?t • 4-way i Y •f t.4. ^ Ili ft g of •.yI- ,r• .. -.. il 14( ...0% , . Apt a . WI 49 , b. •i, At . .. 1 .. -, . „.4 e w ! 4 • t •• 1 t. ! n •• `•• t • �� •• ti ;f. .. •�' .•t••..- 1 • kb to {' � I. :r .Fx Be t DD =LION/ ' 4' OODGATE ' � - y� .a • • I. + -iik 10..! 1 1 ' VW' I J a •••t a f t"-�.�r•f •i r t leg • I•'? • I tt •ww•hr • � } ... ..e. • F SIX i 1111L XIS Olt�. .. .1•'..:i: f`- �tS a -t sii +e. •r. . ,• • .• ,5 Icy „# ! �• 1 ••>.� s • t� fa•f • .St, g .: t •• ttL ��t: 1 • L j t ,e t1 a,�. • • v t Irv' • ' + a • 1 b ,{y,, a >. A • y • • • dr OM M • ...r •.•u Yw ii��•. q -•*w• i ,"717- :: -4,1; ,1 cr• -: t ' r- fv,,, . 101- 102- • iille +D CLIFF ROAD —— t1 A ... -- _MOM_ ._ .••.ss .-�•t_� —a3t•,_ _ .--.. e. 11 ('P LOCATIO 1 1tera.1te:Ir.1=):1,1111ie CAW' agYSIKIVIIII0W lifetCANI tSICIMA TRANS— AMERICA SURVEYING TITLE INSURANCE CO . 8ERVICg8 INC. and Eon.l `E' Mr . Mrs . • pprr.0012)452907 PAUI, HAUGEN 1159 dickory dill . all logo'', U 55122 nitv Scale: t"=30' Ns, - Set°Pi'38"E 136.30 — -. 1 O ampules Iron Ape V6 ` I k ' Q5 '� 1 - ' ' 3410 , — 100.00• Varf• 43 . • 00 . /• . i I m • a`a�v e'Po • �,;/ EXISTING :<.2 • 5 " `� koy4ei i i I.....• N I / ...• •'�s` ,f/ _� y t'i a ` -ios%i/,e `�1 �' `` 414'4 Syro `� 4 a /v./A V . •s` a5/ L y 17? / L:i 1 . --,,ja �,� �^� ° o. 1LJ 19y \` OY ��A �, tv C e e a j e lv �' ' IPROPOSED�.� ,. , ` o/,:'''4 00 `' ' 6 Qef , lbr'' p 7 n to �., 4vy • 40' _ - ;7•. : �Gr 43 Z 4t ic. * See Skeet Z for Ae se riptiens * • -SU RYEYORS CERTIFICATION- I hereby certify that this survey. plan or _ report was prepared by aye or under ay direct supervision and that 1 am a duly Registered land Surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota. "IPA-6'`t om Date: -Ay Wayne D. Cordes. Minn. :kg. No. 14675 7 'Yaks gtvin si; SI4t• New Pi. +Ilion 1.3..e (1o'01:t Ow L:11.w0, Agenda Information Memo December 21, 1993 City Council Meeting REZONING/LYMAN DEVELOPMENT COMPANY F. Rezoning, Lyman Development Company,of approximately 1.6 AG (Agricultural) acres to an R-1 (Single Family) district located along the west side of Highway 3, south of DiMey Road in the NE 1/4 of Section 25—The Advisory Planning Commission conducted a hearing on this proposed rezoning at its meeting on November 23, 1993. The commission recommended approvak of the rezoning as consistent with the City's comprehensive plan. Enclosed on pages t l`lthrough 1,13 is a copy of the staff report on this item. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny a rezoning of approximately 1.6 acres of agriculturally zoned land to R-1 (single family) for Lyman Development Company located along the west side of Highway 3, south of Diffley Road in the NE 1/4 of Section 25. • 1 1 Page 8/EAGAN ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES NOVEMBER 23, 1993 AESONING - LYMAN DEVELOPMENT COMPANY Chairman Voracek opened the next public hearing of the evening regarding a Rezoning of approximately 1.6 AG (Agricultural) acres to an R-1 (Single Family) district located along the vest side of Highway 3 south of Diffley Road in the NE 1/4 of Section 25. City Planner Sturm introduced the item, stating that the applicant seeks to rezone 1.5 acres consisting of Lot 6, Auditor's Subdivision No. 42 Egan and Lot 2, Auditor's Subdivision No. 43 Inver Grove Heights, from Agricultural to R-1. He explained that the subject property is located vest of Highway 3, north of Hawthorne Woods 3rd Addition and south of Diffley Road. Mr. Sturm stated that the subject property currently contains a single family dwelling on the north half. He stated that the subject property is designated as D-II (Mixed Residential) with 0 - 6 units per acre permitted under the City's comprehensive guide plan. He noted that the applicant is also requesting a Waiver of Plat to split the subject property into 2 parcels. Steve Ryan, a representative of Lyman Development Inc. , was present for questions. Miller moved, Gorman seconded, the motion to approve a Rezoning of approximately 1.6 AG (Agricultural) acres to an R-1 (Single Family) district located along the west side of Highway 3 south of Diffley Road in the NE 1/4 of Section 25. All present voted in favor. ` � MEMO _. city of eagan DATE: DECEMBER 6, 1993 TO: TOM HEDGES, CITY ADMINISTRATOR ,FROM: KEN VRAA, DIRECTOR OF PARKS AND RECREATION SUBJECT: LYMAN DEVELOPMENT COMPANY - WAIVER OF PLAT/LOT SPLIT The Advisory Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission reviewed the above referenced proposal at their December 3, 1993 meeting and make the following recommendations to the City Council relative to Lyman Development Company's request for waiver of plat/lot split: 1. This lot will be subject to a cash parks dedication. 2. This lot will be subject to a cash trails dedication. 3. This lot will be subject to water quality dedication 4. There are no woodland preservation issues associated with this plat. KV:cm cc: Marilyn Wucherpfennig, Planning Aide Ed Kirscht, Engineering Technician SUBJECT: REZONING APPLICANT: LYMAN DEVELOPMENT, INC. . LOCATION: NE QUARTER SECTION 25 EXISTING ZONING: AGRICULTURAL (A) DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: NOVEMBER 23, 1993 DATE OF REPORT: NOVEMBER 9, 1993 COMPILED BY: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT APPLICATION SUMMARY: An application has been submitted requesting a Rezoning of the 138 acre, Lot 6, Auditor's Subdivision No. 42 Egan, and Lot 2, Auditor's Subdivision No.43 Inver Grove, from A(Agricultural) to R-1 (Single Family). The site is located west of Highway 3, north of Hawthorne Woods 3rd Addition, and south of Diffley Road. APPLICABLE REGULATIONS: Chapter 11, Section 11.40, Subd. 5, Amendments (Including Zoning.) EXISTING CONDITIONS: The site currently contains a single family dwelling and a detached garage on the north half; the southern half is cultivated field. CONSISTENCY WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: The property is guided D-II Mixed Residential (0-6 units/acre). Rezoning to R-1 would, therefore, be consistent with the Comprehensive Guide Plan designation. RELATED ACTIONS: The applicant has also submitted an application requesting a Waiver of Plat to split this property into two parcels. PLANNING CONSIDERATIONS: There have been no concerns raised related to this rezoning request. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: To approve/deny the Rezoning request. lay I rPc, 4 ' — \ \ _■••••ag.• 0 t • .. .., - • • . c• .......1 • • • ",.. . • I — . :al , CT. - US* 1--4200— . I"'• •: /=, .r.-...)'ic,, 10An ..------- • ••,, tgi 14.1 c LOCATION `......!. 7 .. . _ . il ----4441411— PI--Kirelr-mmilli * Ak...--•■•—•-• S'' 1 NiVellIW:. ArAr a.. I -s, ""' -i -..'• , it-t■ b4 / J I - Cliti ---ny,r ,: -t..,...,_,--,-..-, --•;* .if A - • . ell % 1 :1'117 1...• -.2-**,......":11:;:7' 1 II •V !Ir. B.! ...p ..,,,..- : ,...1.,... 4, ..,,, 4j -• • .,a , --..-:.-- • •,-. .. .. .4-z--1L 1+vTn.. I auaoor s ZONING . 1 *..., ...4 •••44:12 t - •.„.• !.;...f:'"i ..' 1 ,i i *. , • 1- --..--: ii:‘,•- • -. ''s''---• ...// ' I it — A •'T l •t...,:.- ": • 1 ii-11.. ._ - am ■.l .; % - - PI( -•,-- 111 nom ' 7idituill' 44( stoma ucryr,! !!!= Pc . .,-.,., iti....;:„;.--;•:.-.-- P , ,... o.. . . • .4, ‘,....: . ... !..t:' -..- , 'Yu:. ,s. ;.' ''',. . ,,.'':.,':. z' , , : . /4."—• . , • •.• • :4'- .... • • •-,..... •r` • • • ';r1ki-,... . . .-. _ •'-'•• •';' - - • , . - ■ t , 3 t'.t., ' .,r6`. ■ .4;r 1't,:,.:.',f 1,.• 7,`,.'...k • • 4 ,e 4., .....,S'.,.."... .,'S.^.,7,:15,e. x)i^',...J 7,...4,,'..7. '^■■•, ' •: , , •,. GUIDE PLAN , -T ..... pc_ -',' - * ‘..,..,..k.l.t- 4',,s;• B ,e)t. : ...... ,-.., 1 v , 4' 11.t.,‘V' 111 v..,,, z '6.'''""q,..CII.•?..'Y ' ) •• <:,..\' ''$.;: r'''''1.i.:;.. i. s"..N...r.*# . .. r -,.....0,,,,.,,,,w../xx.,.... 0 .,.... ...„. , . 0 w . ..,., , • -- . .. ..,... r-- ......., . . . r. .- ; ... ,,,,........* -- ..., , / 0--1 ) —W-'—`*---..: I, •■ 1-i — DIFFLEY ; . . re. ..,„„i. \..... 1 040.08 ' - . % •;• •tip`� • •• `• aY - , ; UB. NO. 42 EG A N SUBJECT 11""•• ••• s•t•a .:!!_.. Y:•_ 'e A' �— �• • :. •., r .•• ¶ , - . • 1 ; H•, ., J a lit a-st»:: W• thi CAST 114.1.1 . : E. . .'``'. .. ' .. - , .._. 1 '. ; ' '---111 • s9R t•..: a... , ) , 7 is I. 4 1 . .a 1 i I-. • •...a • ill.. . ien 7; "."` _. , ::..t.-_-_:.....: ''.11,;,,, . ••••„... ' i.ii ; ; * •. : E. . .. • .... • -4 .!,.., , * : 1//.6.4, • A ' 'TT" _ .'��•� ` ; • -. u; 4•.`,1 • .r • •- •• •....1 .. 024-30- - .44. • tAV s 1• ......'4ZZ.••■■■••••■••:\ 1 ` 1401-- ...- toi47.1 ram.,..z, osa.ara ; i . i 8 ' lq fi-0,as,•e• :b6.• . r • t.. 3 *. 1 'f ii t 1)13. ti .y i. • \�. a N A a _ . 1•.r i 1. .,,,.. ,. 1,....41..1,iii..; / i t//,, w I`�y �Alt f�h f• e • ''w._ w • • •fir t • : • • \.•-••33 • Agenda Information Memo December 21, 1993 City Council Meeting WAIVER OF PLAT/LYIVIAN DEVELOPMENT COMPANY G. Waiver of Plat,Lyman Development Company,to split Lot 6,Auditor's Subdivision No. 42,Eagan,and Lot 2,Auditor's Subdivision No.43,Inver Grove Heights,located along the west side of Highway 3, south of Diffley Road in the NE 1/4 of Section 25—Lyman Development,Inc.,has requested the waiver of plat to split Lot 6,Auditor's Subdivision No. 42, Eagan, and Lot 2, Auditor's Subdivision No. 43, Inver Grove Heights, located west of Highway 3 uth of Diffley Road. The staff report on this waiver is included on pages/2_5:7 through The Advisory Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on this matter at its meeting on November 23, 1993. The APC recommended approval of this waiver subject to the nine conditions set forth in the minutes enclosed in this packet. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the waiver of plat for Lot 6, Auditor's Subdivision No. 42, Eagan, and Lot 2, Auditor's Subdivision No. 43, Inver Grove Heights,located along the west side of Highway 3,south of Diffley Road in the NE 1/4 of Section 25, subject to the nine conditions set forth in the Planning Commission minutes. l � Page 9/EAGAN ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES NOVEMBER 23, 1993 'Arm OP PLAT - LYMAN DEVELOPMENT COMPANY Chairman Voracek opened the next public hearing of the evening regarding a Waiver of Plat in order to split Lot 6, Auditor's Subdivision No. 42 Egan and Lot 2, Auditor's Subdivision No. 43 Inver Grove Heights located along the west side of Highway 3 south of Diffley Road in the NE 1/4 of Section 25. City Planner Sturm stated that the applicant was requesting a Waiver of Plat to split Lot 6, Auditor's Subdivision No. 42 Egan and Lot 2, Auditor's Subdivision No. 43 Inver Grove Heights into 2 lots. He noted that the applicant has developed all of the Hawthorne Woods Additions located in the area of the subject property. He stated that the parcel split will result in one 3/4 acre lot and one vacate lot approximately 2/3 of an acre. Mr. Sturm further stated that the major issues involved are Parcel B's (southern lot) access onto Highway 3 and whether Parcel B may be attached to the property to the south. He noted that the applicant had received approval from MnDOT for an access driveway to Highway 3. Steve Ryan, a representative of Lyman Development Inc. , stated that he had no additional comments. City Planner Sturm added that there may be an opportunity for Parcel B to share Parcel A's driveway. He further stated, in response to Member Merkley's inquiry, that Parcel B is buildable width-wise. Chairman Voracek stated that he previously viewed the subject property and envisioned any access from Parcel B to Highway 3 as questionable. He further stated that he would like to see Parcel B "merge" with the property to the south and that Parcel B's access would be via the cul-de-sac to the south. Member Miller asked if Parcel B was improved with a home, would a Highway 3 access be necessary. Mr. Ryan stated that access to Highway 3 would be difficult because of the extreme slope on the property. He further stated that the property owners acknowledge those difficulties. Markley moved, Wallace seconded, the motion to approve a Waiver of Plat in order to split Lot 6, Auditor's Subdivision No. 42 Egan and Lot 2, Auditor's Subdivision No. 43 Inver Grove Heights located along the west side of Highway 3 south of Diffley Road in the NE 1/4 of Section 25, subject to the following conditions: t Page 10/EAGAN ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES NOVEMBER 23, 1993 1. These standard conditions of plat approval as adopted by Council action on February 2, 1993 shall be complied with: Al, B1, B2, B3, B4, Cl, El, Ti, G1 and H1 2. The applicant must record the Waiver of Plat with Dakota County and provide documentation to the City within 60 days of City Council approval. 3. All applicable City ordinances must be met. 4. The maximum slope of the driveway to serve Parcel B shall be 10%. 5. The lowest entry level of the proposed house on Parcel B shall be constructed at an elevation 3 feet above the HWL of Pond JP-26.1 or higher. 6. A detailed grading, drainage and erosion control plan shall be prepared and submitted with the building permit application and the plan shall show the house and driveway location. 7. Drainage swales shall be provided around the proposed house to perpetuate surface drainage away from State Trunk Highway 3 to Pond JP-26.1. 8. This development shall dedicate 5-foot drainage and utility easements along all lot lines. 9. The development shall dedicate a drainage and utility easement over Pond JP-26.1 up to 3 feet above the HWL of the pond. All present voted in favor. • • I SUBJECT: WAIVER OF PLAT (R-1 SINGLE FAMILY) APPLICANT: LYMAN DEVELOPMENT, INC. LOCATION: NE QUARTER SECTION 25 EXISTING ZONING: AGRICULTURAL (A) DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: NOVEMBER 23, 1993 DATE OF REPORT: NOVEMBER 17, 1993 COMPILED BY: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT APPLICATION SUMMARY: An application has been submitted requesting a Waiver of Plat to split Lot 6, Auditor's Subdivision No. 42 Egan and Lot 2,Auditor's Subdivision No. 43 Inver Grove into two lots located west of Highway 3, north of Hawthorne Woods 3rd Addition, and south of Diffley Road. APPLICABLE REGULATIONS: Chapter 13, Section 13.40, Subd. 3, Waivers. PROPOSAL: The applicant has developed all of the Hawthorne Woods additions in this area. The public improvement project associated with the Hawthorne Woods 3rd Addition required water main and sanitary sewer lines to be extended north to tie into lines in place along Diffley Road. This resulted in the need to acquire utility easements across Lot 1 and Lots 3-7, Auditor's Subdivision No. 42 Egan. The developer successfully negotiated easements from all property owners. The easement agreements were executed as planned until the owner of Lot 6 refused to sign unless the developer agreed to purchase half of her property. The property owner intends to use the proceeds from this sale to pay the pending assessment from this same public improvement. This Waiver of Plat application would split the parcel in the negotiated way. CONSISTENCY WITH COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: The Comprehensive Land Use Guide Plan designates this area D-II Mixed Residential, (0-6 units/acre) density. PLANNING CONSIDERATIONS: • The split will result in one .75 acre lot with an existing single family home and detached garage and one vacant .67 acre lot. The existing structures will meet R-1 setback requirements and the newly-created lot is large enough to accommodate all setback requirements. • The applicant has received approval from MnDOT for an access driveway to Highway 3 for the proposed Parcel B. • o Lot 7,Auditor's Subdivision No.42 Egan,separates the subject property from the northern edge of Hawthorne Woods 3rd Addition. This parcel has gone tax forfeit and does not have frontage on Highway 3. The City cannot require the applicant to purchase this property; however, staff has encouraged Lyman Development to acquire the property. The applicant does not believe the parcel has any value, but has agreed to purchase the property provided the fee is nominal • Due to the steep incline along State Trunk Highway 3,a large amount of grading will be necessary to prepare the lot for the new driveway if they decide to accept direct access to State Trunk Highway 3. The City Code allows for a maximum slope of 10%for driveways. Grading will also be necessary for preparing the new lot for building construction. o The developer shall submit a detailed grading,drainage and erosion control plan prior to building permit issuance. The plan shall show the location of the house and driveway and it shall show the elevations of the house. The drainage from this site slopes from State Trunk Highway 3 and generally flows westerly, draining into Pond JP-26.1, which is a pond on the City's Comprehensive Stormwater Management Plan. During the preparation of the lot for building construction, drainage swales shall be provided to keep drainage of this lot flowing away from State Trunk Highway 3 and to Pond JP-26.1. Also, the lowest entry level that the proposed house can be constructed at is 839.0 feet, 3 feet above the high water level of Pond JP-26.1. o During the construction of the new lot, the builder will be responsible for providing erosion control. o Sanitary sewer of sufficient depth and capacity and water main service of sufficient pressure and capacity is readily available to serve this development. An 8"sanitary sewer and 6"water main were installed along the eastern lot line during the summer of 1993 under City Project 650, Hawthorne Woods 3rd Addition. 4" sanitary sewer and 1"water services were provided to the existing house on Parcel A and to the proposed house on Parcel B. The sanitary sewer service for the house on Parcel B is stubbed to the lot at elevation 835.0. o Access to the existing lot is currently from State Trunk Highway 3. However,the existing driveway does encroach into the adjacent lot to the north. • This lot split shall dedicate all right-of-way and easements necessary for State Trunk Highway 3. A 150-foot permanent right-of-way is required for State Trunk Highway 3. Also, 5-foot easements shall be dedicated along the new lot lines. The development shall dedicate a drainage and utility easement over Pond JP- 26.1 up to 3 feet above the HWL of the pond 1 ° The development will be responsible for ensuring that all regulatory agency permits (MPCA, MWCC, Dept. of Health, MnDOT, etc.) are acquired prior to final plat approval. PARK &TRAIL DEDICATION: The Advisory Parks, Recreation, and Natural Resources Commission will be reviewing this Waiver of Plat at their December meeting. Cash parks and cash trails dedications are anticipated. WATER QUALITY AND WETLANDS: This lot split will create another developable parcel which will change runoff characteristics for Parcel B. Thus, staff will recommend a cash dedication for water quality based on the area of Parcel B. There are no wetlands on either parcel, so wetland impacts are not an issue. These recommendations are subject to approval by the Advisory Parks, Recreation, and Natural Resources Commission. FINANCIAL OBLIGATION -Waiver of Plat 25-W-6-9-93, Lot 6,Auditors Subdivision 42, Egan There are levied assessments with an unpaid balance of $0 which will be allocated to the parcels created by this waiver of plat. The financial obligation is subject to change based upon the areas and dimensions of the plat contained in the final plat. Based upon the study of the financial obligations collected in the past and the uses proposed for the property, the following charges are proposed. The charges are computed using the City's current fee schedule and the connection and availability of the City's utility system based on the submitted plans. Improvement Use Rate Quantity Amount Storm Sewer Trunk S.F. .071 sq ft 60,113 ■ There I a pending assessment of $10,631 on the parcel that is proposed for splitting. This pending assessment is for a water and sanitary service,water and sanitary sewer laterals,water and sanitary sewer trunk charges. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: To approve/deny the Waiver of Plat with the following conditions: 1. These standard conditions of plat approval as adopted by Council action on February 2, 1993 shall be complied with: Al, Bl, B2, B3, B4, Cl, El, Fl, Gi, and H1 2. The applicant must record the Waiver of Plat with Dakota County and provide documentation to the City within 60 days of City Council approval. 3. All applicable City ordinances must be met. 4. The maximum slope of the driveway to serve Parcel B shall be 10%. S. The lowest entry level of the proposed house on Parcel B shall be constructed at an elevation 3 feet above the HWL of Pond JP 26.1 or higher. 6. A detailed grading, drainage and erosion control plan shall be re ared and P P submitted with the building permit application and the plan shall show the house and driveway location. 7. Drainage swales shall be provided around the proposed house to perpetuate surface drainage away from State Trunk Highway 3 to Pond JP-26.1. 8. This development shall dedicate 5-foot drainage and utility easements along all lot lines. 9. The development shall dedicate a drainage and utility easement over Pond JP-26.1 up to 3 feet above the HWL of the pond. 3O 1 STANDARD CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL A. Financial Obligations 1. This development shall accept its additional financial obligations as defined in the staff's report in accordance with the final plat dimensions and the rates in effect at the time of final plat approval. B. Easements and Rights-of-Way 1. This development shall dedicate 10-foot drainage and utility easements centered over all lot Ines and, in addition, where necessary to accommodate existing or proposed utilities for drainage ways within the plat. The development shall dedicate easements of sufficient width and location as determined necessary by engineering standards. 2. This development shall dedicate, provide, or financially guarantee the acquisition costs of drainage,ponding, and utility easements in addition to public street rights-of-way as required by the alignment, depth, and storage capacity of all required public utilities and streets located beyond the boundaries of this plat as necessary to service or accommodate this development. 3. This development shall dedicate all public right-of-way and temporary slope easements for ultimate development of adjacent roadways as required by the appropriate jurisdictional agency. 4. This development shall dedicate adequate drainage and ponding easements to incorporate the required high water elevation plus three (3) feet as necessitated by storm water storage volume requirements. C. Plans and Specifications 1. All public and private streets, drainage systems and utilities necessary to provide service to this development shall be designed and certified by a registered professional engineer in accordance with City adopted codes, engineering standards, guidelines and policies prior to application for final plat approval. 2. A detailed grading, drainage, erosion, and sediment control plan must be prepared in accordance with current City standards prior to final plat approval. 3. This development shall ensure that all dead-end public streets shall have a cul-de-sac constructed in accordance with City engineering standards. 4. A separate detailed landscape plan shall be submitted overlaid on the proposed grading and utility plan. The financial guarantee for such plan shall be included in the Development Contract and shall not be released until one year after the date of City certified compliance. D. Public Improvements .1. If any improvements are to be installed under a City contract, the appropriate project must be approved by Council action prior to final plat approval. E. permits 1. This development shall be responsible for the acquisition of all regulatory agency permits required by the affected agency prior to final plat approval. F. Parks and Trails Dedication 1. This development shall fulfill Its park and trail dedication requirements as recommended by the Advisory Parks, Recreation and Natural Resource Commission and approved by Council action. G. Water Quality Dedication 1. This development shall be responsible for providing a cash dedication, ponding, or a combination thereof in accordance with the criteria identified in the City's Water Quality Management Plan, as recommended by the Advisory Parks, Recreation and Natural Resource Commission and approved by Council action. H. Other 1. All subdivision,zoning and other ordinances affecting this development shall be adhered to, unless specifically granted a variance by Council action. Advisory Planning Commission City Council Approved: August 25. 1987 September 15. 1987 • Revised: iJuly 10. 1990 Revised: February 2. 1993 LTS•5 STANDARD.CON 1 3 - • • • I �JCJIi• g N. MR E • s CT. l u> 1 _ ., . -- .,- •- 5 111)1 LOCATION - ''` W �� g n....cil Z till '411r7VIr 4''IN II J� t �1d / ;W:;;;;L:..,'...•::7- ' ( kkioi- " .. el, , .1,10) .:'.- ..4.::::-..--1 -- ,• 4141 I'i - ! .I_ ,A1 : .1 ,;r . _ PO 42C ZONING _ .�.- -.: .it ; ALI R..mous sum. Nu 411 11 .- . _ s-;; pit r , J? n! -1 I' -- t • ' .'ir Ilium 44( 1.�..._. P, . g P t ti.. .-. _sfr. i. . . rt GUIDE PLAN � . _ t • II 1..--) -- 6." r :x 1/ • T • \ ,..,,3 ;.,,v,, ....? . . . • • ,...... .. I • . ■ • • sastmay NO 30 I*. _g23.06 •ME a .. 1 1• 1 N 'it.. -,•ice•••{ a•{tY L!• , i'i' `'-'••- j •it:g 3 ♦ ' •'' .••• ••••' •,• .... _. 1 UB. NO. 42 E G • N , . .. --.�-- .... .. Isuamarl .., 4 Oi /_4,0/10;•1 ' ...wareir• : 4:t • - 1 i : , • 26 lip I ...- ; : ... . .. , ....--..• .. a , • ' - • •..11Pgi a . 'Y lei•••y* ,:.i ".-"••1... '..• '.. ••• • ..-•••• J \It SA:I&. • W t .•r 4 4- • a ....e.,3 ..11*-74r u .— --' -. .. 1"11,- 411 1, •6666 I:: IN t it I i \ 6 / ':% 9,6 ..- �M Vi • '• tV r•••::'..." / s• % • t Y 19T3 i .. . .• •. • •4 / •J • • • � ' • • *uottoR'S 1 i s;, • At � . ..„L......"• .i .•....• •-- • �,0.42 • . .hip f • . `tsl!-•p, . ••• • , .-.4w•— • • •1 .M.., • . . K4• :• y r. • P r' • . /a }s.• • • t • . " •j a q.*: .4h1M''' ' 3•'. 'Th %**: 1." CV —Wm^ . i .6 f %% , NIG. ./,:: • : ... ...4 k 114itf If 30. ''. I 4 ' IP I •• ..,. .../. 41711111#11p1.4011476.0:17.4 "a." : /4;") / L ••vat- -... V i*iit Z.• 1a. t w. it/• t •. ,� f f. •\ N�.�• ::• i 3 t ei • ..... .... '6 ii go,�� NMN� NO + N % t 0 \SI Iki L ir flool. t g..• _ ,.:1. --- or � 1....we gi tit 1ti j O. •• 0 INA as too 1 +I j= i _. a AE or 4 +• 0 II c c. CC 5 141 W i ; CC 0 0 41 1♦ d d o %i • s = aA i . - a r. f.■ s� 3 = _ m ..._ __ T2 W O +� go .. ow r.+d1 , • N*6'I N • 2 II N CC } t 61 N MBA i 0.di' li + `v g ..■...... � i:r' ��. ,n• �'t\ !~ , y r pail* q .5+ . igew or W a • 41 I ..... g . II ` s = It 1 •+ 3 _ i lk --i---------- • '1 ;54.11E a Wit it v, 7 ili sill ill 11:11 I i go. g a r • • " � Z . 11!1 ! ' • . ''I !R; 1 1 lif lirt Jew lit is = silt!w i • 4 lc. • 1" i ...:- 11 a I II/ ... 4i rlisi ,is. rtri . r ri r t 44 illi ri I; i 15 ri 1; ii N 4 iii iiil II 31 !Ili 'WA iii iiii ilii - ii 1 " vli ra y t I , IM N0 ii .....-..-- OHMA � item ..... NE .... ..... ...., , it H 1111 ti • ,..,,,,„ (11;10.4.Ili".t 217 li irs''..:',' .:•.•. i'..!• 1 a , \ s 1 1‘ I ill 001 0 1 ....5 s,:y3: `i -�--r �` '��.•ice' 'W...-`'S ifi E: !R M r.�� .. yh .. r •••t _ } . .. i i k a r 0... I i A $ , 1, le r i 1111 ..:iit ,6 . k iti t : 1 = . ilit / nil Hi x 1 ��� urn:s —L---- ,Ly , — . aria 3..6.1.110 S - _.._,•,017•a► a.•Mi 3.aun•3,n a ass • . aay.-wvs 'c a l m m Y at is 0777.. r.= •^: T . . f 1 r si. •,";'.•{4 • lI 11 U . 1 3( 1 I . . ' I e ( (...\..-:,1 :Ai sl ..-: 10. i',411111"ilar441.•;■ !V So °Z. I 44 1- N • #, . / faD 11.1 = 1 57.3/7 1.0 ffi a 0 et > 0•"' \ la ....... •„.... •• • •,....• , Lli Z C4 14 --77 0 ik,: :".•,_:51 37,611&! ■ , I \('; , e .i. , , • - 00 ‘...,... i. ..........8- .I LI.;.:- - --- 13 . . 1... . : : .„. or . i.5. i L :... EGm; , r..er4.2%. 4-,,, E C4 , / 5; 1-11641 ScrifTL :87__:1 4.. .;.z).\-- . 696/96.0 - -3- A DDITION .47 1:-> ..1.1...d.: CD 41) 41,- 1 1 T77/i-- -1_,,_-. la lg.. 4 7 .... 1020 dm ).-W-i-re-_- LIV 41.trIP' 427/6... _ / --- er) . • . 7,... - " El :: . ,, ..„..„,...,..„:. ,... . . A ,',. X.•;_',:,%,,..‹.41:11.- ; 1 1 39.0/56.• Lula 4 , . .. (LE) 20" '-?-6\'' DIFt..EY 1020 41.10Aj k .--41 Ow INZI 1\ 46:0/62.0 (1/4,..- 1' di) 4.2.3;83,4;I i :'-' ' .1/1(:) 1 .... .A .... . 0 c .-, .1% i..'/-• . . -711--*-- t., mOt.:4ET:4 —FH-.....":-. .• e9• L. .-1 ii3 1_, fri: ..:. -.4_ i 7 7, 7 ,_ --•' 78.7/1010 b, neat 1 \,.: e I % • ..7: '1-17 :1-1 - "13 — , •y I 211,711.77r'i‘94E171 t__IW4 P*.li,In 11; 9' , CD 719/95.0 1 ~ :'-i4.41'''''' -:.'',47 ' , t —w um , . 4.1.OM WM MO=Ile IMIM IIIINE 11 f ..•• '1' 414 i'''',',1-- -k."&.4 - es Ain" 6, •f t•-:i_.1...ri, I, ( ,..,1/41,01,1;. A . r „ _.... ,c „3, --...4,, ,• . . .....- : . . : 1 I '-., ,.01 I •'::r i I . -;„•,1-,..- ..,1.--.7e.:,,/..„,- , :---.L 2. -.1. • 1 -- 7'''.- // . ! .1-7-7-15,.„-: v.:,k\-,,1-,._,,v.,-,r,,:is.., my nzt• , ,, 1,111% lei 12' ‘.. g I limb um MO=MO .....,,, '* 47 ..1_? L •I It 1 6 : I il 1 ir , t.r•;•104..'. FT. „% i \,. T7-:--?- i r:-.N.I-• •• I -I IM" 2:5._ L ti >OE PI R K 1 59.4 8/0 t-,•.,1-1',(At:._ LAFE Ti 755/9g10 Pr-1 ;FLA 4z) 1 I yi!h-7.;- i ..•_. ,,s. ..--.-1 IS P;, Dt.• ,A: s"f..:,27 • di k,1-:..:-". t •Ti..1„1,s:4• ' 1 211 ,44.1X;t4370,27 'LI, mil ..t_ • %Z ,L ) 1 le.,.,. ' ,I -„c-. I • ty,„,.., ._ --,,,,s, ,1„ - ,.. . -,.....- -1., 07. CZ) -,--'1 F...,-0 ,. ... ' lei riv M -:...:. 1-..v'1"r' /1 " (ELV.44.41311 '_.....fall 7,4 ■ . 0 ). tq li "i. If. : I „of, p_.,..-. 1 i., ,..„,,,9,6w4 ,43,_ - . .,.. , ...... r---1 - - ' --1' . ■ 1 •,/,. . - " . ' • 1 -..;kiQ-,I . !''.-----2751rIk F: -'PY .It 44.= Ilik. ..la ti 1 r-1--,4... I :1 --.,-p- • :,--Ibt;-:•,ce-,s,,,,,>--Y\v pliti Re- In■ le:35.0 - n I.... - L.:.:::...4... ‘D. • -7->•",t2k-v..e..:::y <'\ - 45. ' iial , diq1 /2"Vk IC) ' I ii 7.11 I Itto,„*.LL... 1.4 1 Is" IL , fW--- /1 / I 1 . SITE • FIG. NO. 8 WATER DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM CITY OF • • . EAG A ( si - - • . - . .1 . ;,,•I ...im70 - w .7-7•:.:-.ziwt-0,447. .4.m. ••:;.1. _..-±..0" z...- .1 • .. m ,,t��=:[ • ;_•?le.i: h �' lT-!%� r 84 ` ��•r ::;J,,•,; _( r jl )47!s COI. 'r. ' 1'.�•k •03.3 ;R.;.-...-1�.1 jp-y ' . : ; �.81 ■ .. t_ • ( ' , ':. _00 : ,:1 z( ki �- �, ,�, �� - ", x,25, t,i11.-•• !A 4,,,;•1..3 I. •. • 4*. •..... . „1,0..4 ‘.),0 •Mt: 0 st •`•';. :,- `. �i..• trir: .' 7T, L.S.-_. t+P�:c•. a. . =''�"""lllP - • .• t' /•. ;JP-23l -- JP- c. 4V- -l- �. -81 �a. ;` � 4 822 ■ ,,` .13$ S 1?1.8 _ . 4 x_.30 ti,.• r Ala ' �-�P= ' i ; WTI. • A a. «�.z " V: # r 934.0}- 98$ti crluRrl � P - i r • • Peg J /2.a s fi r^ ■ ( :3 ,0■ - .;ihmt, .� , �y1 4'I 4)j E ]� i. JP-82 f-4�.0 - 1;-f2 .r 862.0 )--C - 4P=-4•41'^'_.J -- 26.0 877.0 •, '/833.8 �loi : .� ETE S r \‘ '\�•• i,,9.64t .. a� - ti •�a AODi ION .a'= - J^�•1 t _A '•fR,L- "� LP-611 '`-11144�lUlL — m ■■ ' -- 900.0 _ _r r t,•/lilliliri� M P• _ 4 I ::tP I ``• PAP LAKE I-, ir. M R �afe2 �Pe 111 4444 . 74 y% N�!Df' ..1 �j/tom "Italli-R411N ak�:pt. �,, a �i ' .' � 4111k4',P- 9• - \ ! IILx .. ` � / I S • SITE . . .. FIGURE No. 17 . . STORM . SEWER LAYOUT LEGEND MOM N *s d MAP .,�.E . --- • . STOW. rRS a..■. S TORY MT STATIMM I..SOr1 • • STOW LIFT STAMIOM re._. p STORY MCI WM .► 40•S■•••.► • CITY OF . . _ -- OOHS NORMAL WAVIER UMW. . . . . . . 100.0 .O MAWS trt 100.0 O R0111111111111111 EAGANcJTO p U I • 1 11111.1 111111 !IIIIIIIIII4 Ili ■ 1 , .1/11 . � ti CS . i 1:l:id ill tic . F i. • ti= = 0 :::::::::::::::::::. l'a' — f �� .s _ _ - Jo Vii: 3 0 NNAr N'iJ -- 616 ,—j ■ i � a1E... ::- -- 1 1 I -Iii Ilt 5 ,r ••'• .. T ,r .. .******.',•****. •..:1 -- - - -- '....•... -NAI— ' 'le••i.ei•W:e;•f.t'e•:........:;•,..e.".1:.•:::::::::"'"••••••. 1••• ... .-... . ..,_\, .... .. 4:.'....1;-•:. '....f.....:2,1•• ';'.::::•....:::::',$tiitittli:e.•....... ‘‘, ...,?1.- \ --1.- \C . • .* • "' 'rm.. ::•:•:•::: ..... .....F.T......x....:......:::.... ,.... ..... ...,_ .. /1 ' ► :'fit?' :�:•• : •i . Y! ::: ; ! O A • it / IN 1:51 . b:''■'-' .:315.1.11.1.!!!"...... :::::::::01 rNef ,/ a so il 1 , ‘ 11 i/e/ip'.1("L. - ( I •nc?'i�:,. \ \ . 1111 u a• ri O ts:LL9 cr::.* 'rat')*:v 2rilsortin,:e'rs 1111 II r III! \p30\ Agenda Information Memo December 21, 1993 City Council Meeting ' ZONING/ARCON DEVELOPMENT, INC. H. Rezoning,Arcon Development Incorporated,of 14.80 AG (Agricultural) acres to an R-1 (Single Family) district located along the east side of Dodd Road, west of Highway 3 in Section 36—The Advisory Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on this proposed rezoning at its meeting of November 23, 1993. As the attached minutes indicate,there was a very lengthy public discussion of this proposed rezoning. Residents in the area, south of Cliff along Dodd Road, are concerned with the urbanizing nature of their neighborhood. After a great deal of discussion with both the residents and the applicant, the Advisory Planning Commission recommended voted 5 to 2 to recommend the rezoning to the City Council. Enclosed on pages t t4( through 1M is the staff report on this item. Subsequent to the Planning Commission meeting, Director of Public Works Colbert and Community Development Director Reichert met with the residents of the area to discuss their concerns. Staff also described the public improvements that would be required in the area and the resulting financial impact through assessments on the unplatted properties in the area. At that meeting, the residents indicated they were interested and that they realized they may need to accept area assessments for sewer, water and storm sewer but they are interested in seeing zoning and comprehensive plan amendments that would reduce the intensity of development. They may be raising this issue with the City Council and asking for estate zoning on this property which would require a minimum 20,000 square foot lot. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny a rezoning of approximately 14.8 agricultural acres to R-1 (single family) located along the east side.of Dodd Road, west of Highway 3, in Section 36. 7(10 Page 11/EAGAN ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES NOVEMBER 23, 1993 ==ZONING - ARCON DEVELOPMENT, INC. Chairman Voracek opened the next public hearing of the evening regarding a Rezoning of 14.80 AG (Agricultural) acres to an R-1 (Single Family) district located along the east side of Dodd Road west of Highway 3 in Section 36. City Planner. Sturm stated that the applicant was requesting a rezoning of 14.8 acres from Agricultural to an R-1 district located along the east side of Dodd Road west of Highway 3 in Section 36. He stated that presently Lakeside Animal Hospital is on the eastern portion of the site but the applicant intends to remove it before development. The City's comprehensive guide plan designates the subject property as D-II (Mixed Residential) and the proposed rezoning to R-1 is consistent with the guide plan. Mr. Sturm noted that the applicant was also requesting a preliminary plat consisting of 20 lots to be heard on the next agenda item. Scott Johnson, president of Arcon Development Inc. , was present but stated that he had no additional comments regarding the rezoning request. Doug Johnson, 4775 Dodd Road, stated he owns property across Dodd Road from the proposed development. He stated that he is representing the property owners located on the west side of Dodd Road, south of Cliff Road and north of Farm Road. Mr. Johnson stated that the property owners' first concern is that the proposed development is inconsistent with the neighborhood, noting that the existing lots are 1-6 acre lots which have been there for approximately 30 years. Mr. Johnson further noted that a majority of the existing lots are approximately 5 acre lots and many have horse farms. He stated that the proposed development will take away the rights of these horse owners. Mr. Johnson stated that his community is on the southeast end of Eagan and is not typical of Eagan. He stated that 95 to 99 percent of the properties in this area are developed as a community with s pa ce an d privacy. He stated his concern is that the neighbors do not have a voice. He further stated that their concerns for the development are the same as if they lived in a residential area and the proposed development was an apartment building. The residents wished to see the proposed development to have 2 to 4 acre lots. Mr. Johnson stated that their second concern was the proposed City utility services extension along Dodd Road. He explained that the existing property owners are not asking for or interested in the (4( Page 12/EAGAN ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES NOVEMBER 23, 1993 proposed utilities and that the developer should pay for the utilities. He again stated that the subject property is the last piece of land to be developed and therefore the developer should pay for the utilities. He also addressed the following questions to the Commission: (1) whether the utilities are for this one development; (2) what will happen to the condition of Dodd Road when heavy construction equipment uses it; (3) why the development cannot be required to have larger lots; and (4) what is the comprehensive guide plan and when was it put into place. Charles Morgan, 4785 Dodd Road, stated that he bought his property approximately five years ago and chose the location because of the character of the neighborhood. Jim Thompson, 4875 Dodd Road, stated he has 335 feet of frontage along Dodd Road and therefore is concerned with respect to any assessments for the proposed utilities. He stated that the assessment would be greater than the price he paid to build his house. Mr. Thompson further stated that he should not have to pay for utilities when he bought 5 acres to avoid City utilities. He stated that the developer should pay for the utilities. Bob Hawkins, 4711 Dodd Road, stated that his house is 600 to 700 feet from Dodd Road and therefore should not have to pay for the utilities. He further stated that he concurs with the other residents and that he bought his property to enjoy the area. Mr. Mooseback, 4795 Dodd Road, stated that he is a 16-year resident and concurs with the other residents regarding the composition of the development and concerns regarding the utilities. He also stated that he has no need for or interest in running utilities to his property. Ann Johnson, 4775 Dodd Road, stated she is "strongly opinionated" regarding the proposed development. She stated that the subject property should not be rezoned but continue to exist as is. She stated that should the rezoning request be approved, she asks that the subject property be platted with minimum two-acre lots. Ms. Johnson further stated that City water utilities are not wanted in that area. Community Development Director Reichert responded to Doug Johnson's questions. She explained that the City's comprehensive guide plan was in response to a state requirement and was required to obtain the Metropolitan Council's approval. She further explained that the City was required to decide whether the City would remain as 1 t(- Page 13/EAGAN ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES NOVEMBER 23, 1993 it was or whether the City would be "urbanized." She stated that the City told the Metropolitan Council at the time the plan was approved that the City wanted to be urban. Ms. Reichert, referring to the Eagan zoning map, explained that the southeast corner of Eagan has continually been rezoned from agricultural since 1991 as a result of the City's policy for urban development. With respect to the utility connection charges to the properties along Dodd Road in connection with the proposed development, Community Development Director Reichert explained that the burden of the utility costs are on the properties that are to be served now or will be eventually. This policy is the City Council's reaffirmed wish to have the City "fully urbanized." Assistant City Engineer Foertsch explained that there are two options available to extend City utility services to the proposed development: (1) extend services along Dodd Road; or (2) 'extend utility services along Highway 3 to the subject property. He stated that City staff recommends Option 11 (extend services along Dodd Road) . He noted that there will be connection charges but Option 11 will have less of an impact. Mr. Foertsch explained the policy behind trunk area connection charges, stating that the cost for oversizing a system to handle the added use is paid by every City resident. He noted that it was not mandatory for the residents along Dodd Road to hook up to the City utilities. He further noted that the proposed charges are not for hook-up but for trunk charges (cost for oversizing the system) . This is a policy that has long been followed by the City and is consistent with past practices. He stated that under Option 11 the property owners will be charged $1,540.00 per acre for sewer trunk charges and $1,615 per acre for water trunk charges. Under Option 12 the property owners would be charged the connection charges, plus assessed for installation costs along Dodd Road. Member Hoeft suggested to the property owners that they take the issue of trunk connection charges up with the City Council and suggested that they seek a waiver. Assistant City Engineer Foertsch stated that he was not familiar with any case of waiver of connection charges by the Council, but noted the Council has negotiated with property owners with respect to payment plans of such charges. Community Development Director_ Reichert stated that an area in the southeast corner that was removed from the "community area" was not required to pay connection charges but added that the property owners were required to waive any right to subdivide their property in the future. A cheer of agreement echoed throughout the audience. c Page 14/EAGAN ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES NOVEMBER 23, 1993 Ron Armstrong, a resident of Dodd Road, stated that he was concerned with the heavy equipment on Dodd Road because the road was just recently paved and the property owners were assessed. Chairman Voracek inquired of City staff as to how small a parcel can be subdivided without City utilities being required. City Attorney Dougherty stated that the Metropolitan Council and Dakota County are hesitant to allow more wells and septic systems. He further stated that he is unaware of any standard to determine how many acres are required for a well or septic system. Member Hoeft stated that the only issue presently before the Commission was rezoning and that he was not in favor of "holding the parcel hostage" by requiring larger lots. He stated that he favored the rezoning of the property. Member Miller concurred with Member Hoeft stating that the issue is whether to change the property from Agricultural to R-1. Chairman Voracek stated that he recognized a policy for urban development in the City but would like an opportunity to see a section of this City allow larger lots, not just residential size lots. He suggested to continue the matter to request a policy statement from the City Council addressing the issue of leaving an area of this City as agricultural or limit it to larger lots. Alternate Wallace concurred with Chairman Voracek and added that the utility trunk charges concerned him. Member Miller stated that he acknowledged the neighboring property owners' rights but also that the applicant has aright as a property owner to rezone the property from Agricultural to R-1. Chairman Voracek responded by stating he was not looking to deny the applicant his rights as a property owner but as a responsible member of the Commission representing the residents he believed the City should take time to make a decision in this matter and not be hasty. Member Miller stated that it would not be necessary to continue this matter to ask the Council for a policy statement regarding the rezoning issue because the Council may make that determination when the rezoning issue in this matter is before them. Page 15/EAGAN ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES NOVEMBER 23, 1993 Member Heyl stated that she would recommend approval of the rezoning because it is consistent with the comprehensive guide plan. Scott Johnson stated that the City Council's policy for urbanization is affirmed in the City's comprehensive guide plan. He further stated that the City Council can address the issue of rezoning in this area at its meeting on this matter. He further stated that the financial burden is not the developer's responsibility pursuant to the City Council's policies. Member Merkley concurred with Member Miller stating that the rezoning issue was before the Commission and the question of lot size is a plat issue to be decided during the next item. Community Development Director Reichert stated that there is a 12,000 sq. ft. minimum lot size in a R-1 district and it is questionable whether the City may require larger lots. City Attorney Dougherty stated that the issue is whether to approve the request to rezone. He stated that the denial must not be arbitrary or capricious. Member Hoeft stated that the proposed plat indicates that several lots have a large area but 2/3 may be under water. He questioned how much area was under water. City Planner Sturm showed the proposed plat regarding the lot lines. The developer stated that the water lines meet all ordinary high water mark requirements. Merkley moved, Miller seconded, the motion to approve a Rezoning of 14.80 AG (Agricultural) acres to an R-1 (Single Family) district located along the east side of Dodd Road vest of Highway 3 in Section 36. Merkley, Miller, Hoeft, Heyl, Gorman approved; Voracek, Wallace opposed. Passed 5-2. T SUBJECT: REZONING APPLICANT: ARCON DEVELOPMENT, INC. LOCATION: PART OF N 1/2 OF SECTION 36 AND OUTLOT A, DODD VIEW ADDITION EXISTING ZONING: AGRICULTURAL (A) DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: NOVEMBER 23, 1993 DATE OF REPORT: NOVEMBER 17, 1993 COMPILED BY: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT APPLICATION SUMMARY: An application has been submitted requesting a Rezoning of 14.80 acres from A (Agricultural) to R-1 (Single Family). APPLICABLE REGULATIONS: Chapter 11, Section 11.40, Subd. 5. Amendments, (including zoning). LOCATION/EXISTING CONDITIONS: The site, located in Section 36, is south of Fitz Lake, east of Dodd Road, west of Highway 3, north of Carol Street (unimproved), and consists of one parcel. P.I.D. #10-03600-070-27 is currently zoned A (Agricultural). Lakeside Animal Hospital is located on the eastern portion of this site and takes access from Highway 3. CONSISTENCY WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: The Comprehensive Land Use Guide Plan designates this area as D-II Mixed Residential (0-6 units/acre). The proposed rezoning to R-1 is consistent with the guide plan. RELATED ACTIONS: The applicant has also submitted an application requesting a Preliminary Plat consisting of twenty lots. PLANNING CONSIDERATIONS: There have been no concerns related to this rezoning request. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: To approve/deny this rezoning request. 146 LOCATION PLAN WTLEY , a Co. Rd.30 4h 1 nn._ f �1 f 1 1/! 1 :I:ll: •tr����� • � �nnu �•.,�i a :►;it't ;;S`�`�•.� ii '�ski-=-. �liri say = _�_ 'Z,. :' ::: `. !l 1 f 1 _ '� ITS G.Tnnl.in lui�wd natal • - ,l G• u1 \fit I` r i7,111111r-IF it 0:-._ ..,./ :,...): ,.:,,. in rill • Ct.) .12. <Op....11111 �5,�/1 11 q1_%a M1♦ :4„1i`nl,..— tik ; hY 4-•t/-`1 , , _ ,, ki ,..r g Illiatia -': .1.,,' 'e781"■U ,,,,,,, ,„, .a. 4at 6011 — s • it rs , ni ` is 40[, /'U ' .` ,4 ^'cp 1 I . 1.... ,. , iiil ,' PRWFC Q' 11�0N ` : :IIC -05(0 WA w // it "all I 'III , 1 1 NROSEMOUNT • sums in. • • k(Al • Waterview Addition , 1 - \--. - -1.4-i--:ti a / , — —;5 ,;::7, --- [ - • . ikii ".... : cmg imp k 1 -'ii it ‘j'clia:sr-rnd,ft.: - 7.'14— .4 e4 It) !? 02(4 • A* e . 4 .., pi' LOCATION ! v ,... • or ( II 2 •1 .„. if.m. Sun I SW .-.1.:=:=-T --/ 1 1 . .0,,...,.,4% w ,, f „ it, _ ., , ,,i. _ .0. !..; . , . .-;,..„,!. \,. . ..... ,,...: t, , . \ H ,____ I A .4 ZONING -•. . A , qt if • A r1( A I... /7 -Lil h,g3 411 4 .r..._ • . 1 f 1411■4 a :IL, 42.___ iii '•17 ./ .-t.-... °•-•7,5": - ' GUIDE PLAN . 1 N .;;_.,_•.., ...„ _ 1,...P---,,,T, 4 ' 0 4 • :,e. ':'rf V. •', its; . . AitXtdeptfie .•;1 1 '• ' 131ln Mir- .-41 'I • • 1... ..,i.: . -.._ .\ . • 4AALrb� MEMO city of eagan TO: PEGGY REICHERT, DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT TOM COLBERT, DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS FROM: JIM STURM, CITY PLANNER tO DATE: DECEMBER 10, 1993 SUBJECT: MTG. WITH AREA RESIDENTS REGARDING WATERVIEW ADDITION On Monday evening, December 6, a meeting was held with approximately 15 residents of South Dodd Road with discussion focusing on general development/public improvements in the Waterview area. Peggy gave an overview on urban service areas and explained that Eagan has plans to become totally urbanized. Approximately 50% of the residents in attendance live on the east and west sides of Dodd Road, with most south of Fitz Lake. Tom gave an overview of the utility comprehensive plans, including sanitary water and storm sewer, noting that 93%of Eagan drains toward the Minnesota River and is included in the Gun Club Lake Watershed District. Someone raised the question, Who pays for the trunk utilities?" Tom responded by providing a history of how Eagan has handled assessments; the oversizing of trunk utilities; and distributed a handout on special assessments, noting that trunk utilities are usually assessed over a 15-year period; laterals are assessed on what is actually needed. No oversizing occurs. He also explained that while there are three kinds of assessments, each is only done one time and that R-1 development costs are roughly$20,000/acre. There was discussion regarding the costs associated with the upgrading of Dodd Road and the residents strongly expressed their desire to leave the road "as is." The residents expressed repeated concern with the Waterview Addition, stating that they would like much less density. They felt it was incompatible with the general area and that Fitz Lake is a natural breakpoint with the single family development to the north. They were in favor of Estate size lots as they felt they would be much more compatible with their property which ranges in size from one to five acres. There were general questions regarding the procedLre for the December 21 City Council meeting and it is my impression they will have one Spokesperson for their group. 4°\ Agenda Information Memo December 21, 1993 City Council Meeting PRELIMINARY PLAT/WATERVIEW ADDITION I. Preliminary Plat,Waterview Addition/Arcon Development Incorporated, consisting of 20 lots located along the east side of Dodd Road,west of Highway 3 in Section 36--The staff report on this preliminary plat for 20 lots on 14.8 acres located along the east side of Dodd Road, west of Highway 3, in the vicinity of Carol Street is included on pages/x1 through (oR The Advisory Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on this proposed plat at ifsmeetin of No ember 23, 1993. The minutes of the Planning Commission meeting are enclosed on meeting of through ( During the discussion of the plat , the adjacent residents once again raied issues coiicerning the intensity of development. The commission discussed with the applicant the option of subdividing into larger lots. The applicant did not support such a revision. On a 5 to 2 vote the APC agreed to recommend approval of the plat, subject to the 17 conditions included in the Planning Commission minutes. The commission recommended the addition of condition#17 "No construction equipment shall take access from Dodd Road. All access should be taken from Highway 3." The applicant agreed to comply with this condition. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the preliminary plat for 20 lots on 14.8 acres for Arcon Development, located along the east side of Dodd Road, west of Highway 3 in Section 36, subject to the 17 conditions set forth in the APC minutes. I cD SUBJECT: PRELIMINARY PLAT (WATERVIEW ADDITION) APPLICANT: ARCON DEVELOPMENT, INC. LOCATION: PART OF N 1/2 OF SECTION 36 AND OUTLOT A, DODD VIEW ADDITION EXISTING ZONING: R-1 (SINGLE FAMILY) & (A) AGRICULTURAL DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: NOVEMBER 23, 1993 DATE OF REPORT: NOVEMBER 19, 1993 COMPILED BY: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT APPLICATION SUMMARY: An application has been submitted requesting a Preliminary Plat of twenty lots on 17.84 acres. APPLICABLE REGULATIONS: Chapter 13, Subdivision Regulations (Platting). BACKGROUND: Rezoning and Preliminary Plat applications were submitted for review by the Advisory Planning Commission at their August 24, 1993 meeting. The original applications were for a Planned Development district allowing a mixture of single family and animal hospital uses. The plat indicated Carol Street to be vacated which was not the case and this item was continued a month to vacate Carol Street. The street vacation was heard at the September 21, 1993 City Council meeting where it was again continued due to site- related issues associated to landlocking Outlot B, Dodd View Addition, and was to be considered with the Final Plat. It was again continued at the September 28 and October 26, 1993 Advisory Planning Commission meetings. During this time, staff reviewed revised plans submitted by the developer in an effort to develop a new Preliminary Plat. The current owner, Clarence Fitz, has decided to discontinue Lakeside Animal Hospital, thus requiring the rezoning and preliminary plat applications to change. The rezoning is to R-1 (Single Family) only and the Preliminary Plat was revised to exclude the animal hospital and its access to Highway 3. The developer and City staff have worked out a possible solution to the vacation of Carol Street. In earlier plans, seven lots would have had double frontage from Waterview Court and Carol Street. The revised Preliminary Plat eliminates these double frontage lots. IS ( PROPOSAL: Arcen Development is requesting twenty single family lots on 17.84 acres. Proposed access to the lots is from one cul-de-sac (Waterview Court) off Dodd Road. No access will be taken from Highway 3. The lots range in size from 12,981 sq.ft.to 85,050 sq. ft. and meet all minimum zoning requirements. PLANNING CONSIDERATIONS: Shoreland Zoning: Fitz Lake has been deemed a General Development Lake within the Shoreland Zoning Ordinance and is subject to all its regulations. TREE PRESERVATION: A Tree Preservation and Tree Replacement Plan has been submitted for this development. The plan indicates a total of 154 significant trees located on this site. Twenty-seven trees, or 17% of the total,will be removed as a result of initial site development. This is within the standard of the Tree Preservation Guidelines and no tree replacement will be required. Of the 27 trees to be removed,several of these are large oak trees which occur within the location of the proposed Waterview Court cul-de-sac. Staff has reviewed this loss of trees with the developer, but unfortunately there does not appear to be adequate space to redesign the cul-de-sac in order to save an appreciable number of these trees. It should also be noted that the presence of significant trees on Lots 4-11 and Lot 20,Block 1,will require future builders of these sites to prepare individual lot tree preservation plans at the time of building permit application. PARK&TRAIL DEDICATION: The Advisory Parks, Recreation, and Natural Resources Commission will be reviewing this Preliminary Plat at their December meeting. Cash parks and cash trail dedications are anticipated. i �Y GRADING/DRAINAGE/EROSION CONTROL: The proposed development consists of lightly rolling hills that contain a mixture of grass areas and wooded areas. The north edge of this site abuts Fitz Lake which is designated as Pond LP-26 in the City's Comprehensive Storm Water Management Plan. The outlet for Pond LP-26 was provided in 1992 with the Lakeview Trail Addition, City Project #635. The preliminary grading plan shows the majority of this site will be disturbed to prepare the streets and to construct the houses in this development. The maximum fill shown is 8' and the maximum cut is 14'. Storm water drainage from the proposed east/west street called Waterview Court shall be directed to a water quality pond that is located in the northwest corner of this site. The water quality pond shall be designated as Pond LP-263 and shall have a storm sewer outlet with a maximum discharge rate of 1 cis that drains to Pond LP 26. The grading along Pond LP-26 shall provide a 30'buffer zone to help prevent erosion into Pond LP-26. The grading plan shall show that a 30' section along the south edge of the pond shall.not be disturbed. The existing buildings for the animal hospital are shown to be removed. Any existing wells or septic systems on this site shall be plugged and abandoned according to County requirements. The development will be responsible for installing and maintaining erosion control measures in accordance with the City's Erosion/Sediment Control Manual Standards. WATER QUALITY&WETLANDS: This development is located in Drainage Basin L and will generate runoff that will discharge to Pond LP-26, a 13-acre pond classified to support indirect contact recreation. Water chemistry data collected in 1992 for this pond indicate that the pond's present water quality is excellent.A treatment pond of at least 0.7 acre-feet in wet volume, having a minimum average depth of 3 feet, constructed according to NURP design standards, and located to intercept all runoff from impervious surfaces within the proposed development will be recommended by staff. It is especially important to construct the 10 foot wide 10:1 bench at the NWL for this pond since it will be located in a residential area. The developer's consultant has identified the wetland associated with Pond LP-26 as the only wetland on the site. The wetland has been delineated and the delineation reviewed and approved by staff. No filling or draining of this wetland is planned and none will be allowed, since the wetland provides a valuable buffer for Pond 12-26. It should be noted that Pond LP-26 is identified as a general development lake in the City's shoreland zoning ordinance. Staff will strongly recommend that the restrictions applying to shoreland alterations for general development waters apply. These provisions prohibit clear- cutting and intensive vegetation clearing within the shore impact zone (25 feet of the ordinary high water mark, in this case) and otherwise limit vegetation-disturbing activities within this zone. (S3 These recommendations are subject to approval of the Advisory Parks, Recreation, and Natural Resources Commission. UTILITIES: Sanitary sewer service of sufficient depth and capacity and water main service of sufficient size, pressure and capacity is available to serve this development from two locations; the first location is 1200'to the northeast at the south edge of the Lakeview Trail Addition along the west edge of State Trunk Highway 3. The sanitary sewer at this location is a 15" RCP line with an invert elevation of 908.8 and the water main is an 8" line. The second location is 800'to the north at the intersection of Dodd Road and McFaddens Trail in the Lakeview Trail Addition. The sanitary sewer at this location is an 8" line with an invert elevation of 913.3 and the water main is also an 8"line. The developer has petitioned the aty to construct the sanitary sewer extension to this development and the City has assigned this project as City Project No.666,Waterview Addition-Utility Extensions. The developer then intends to construct the utilities in Waterview Court to serve the proposed houses in this development. The City intends to hold the public hearings for the sanitary sewer and watermain extensions before this development receives preliminary plat approval from the Council. The City Council must approve City Project No. 666 prior to final plat approvaL The development will be required to stub 8" sanitary sewer and 8"watermain to the south edge of the plat in the stub street where the temporary cul-de-sac is proposed. STREETS/ACCESS/CIRCULATION: Street access for the proposed development will be provided from Dodd Road, an existing 24'wide bituminous street with rural sections. The development proposes to construct an 800' long cul-de-sac that will connect to Dodd Road to serve proposed lots 2 through 16 of Block 1, and Lots 1 through 3 of Block 2. Proposed Lot 1 is shown to have its driveway access connecting directly to Dodd Road. The development also proposes to construct a 200-foot long stub street to the south to serve proposed Lot 4 of Block 2. In order to final plat Lot 4 of Block 2, a temporary cul-de-sac with a 45-foot radius shall be constructed at the south end of the stub street. EASEMENTS/RIGHT-OF-WAY/PERMITS: The development shall dedicate all easements required for Pond LP-26 to three feet above the high water level of the pond which is elevation 925.0. The development shall also provide an easement over Pond 12263 to cover an area 3' above the high water level of this pond. The lots along the east edge of the plat abutting Highway 3 shall dedicate a'30' utility easement to allow for the extension of sanitary sewer and watermain along Highway #3. As shown on the preliminary plat,the development shall dedicate a 40'half right-of-way for Dodd Road. The developer has submitted a petition to the City to vacate the right-of-way of Carol Street which abuts the development along the south edge of the plat. If the vacation of Carol Street is not approved, then Lots 14, 15 and 16 of Block 1 and Lot 4 of Block 2 will be below the City's minimum lot size of 12,000 sq. ft. Lc- 4 This development will be responsible for ensuring that all regulatory agency permits (MPCA,MWCC, Mn.Department of Health,MnDOT, Mn.DNR, etc.) are acquired prior to final plat approval. FINANCIAL OBLIGATION•Waterview Addition Based upon the study of the financial obligations collected in the past and the uses proposed for the property, the following charges are proposed. The charges are computed using the City's existing fee schedule and connections proposed to be made to the City's utility system based on the submitted plans. Improvement Use Rate Quantity Amount Sanitary Sewer Trunk S.F. 6740/lot 16 lots 611,840 Water Trunk S.F. 775/lot 20 lots 15,500 Storm Trunk S.F. .071/sq ft 411,206 sq ft Z2.26 Total gs • J ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: To approve/deny the Preliminary Plat with the following conditions: 1. These standard conditions of plat approval as adopted by Council action on February 2, 1993 shall be complied with: Al, Bl, B2, B3, B4, Cl, C2, C3, D1, El, Fl, Gi, and H1 2. All Shoreland Zoning regulations shall be met. 3. Individual lot tree preservation plans shall be prepared on Lots 4-11 and Lot 20, Block 1, at the time of building permit application. 4. Lakeside Animal Hospital shall cease operations prior to initial construction. 5. Permits shall be obtained for the abandonment of the operational well in accordance with Dakota County and State of Minnesota regulations. 6. Permits shall be obtained for the abandonment of the septic system in accordance with City of Eagan and State of Minnesota regulations. 7. The developer is responsible for complying with the Tree Preservation Plan as submitted which states that no mitigation will be required if 17%of the existing tree mass, or less, will be removed from the site. 8. The grading shall preserve a 30' buffer zone of undisturbed vegetation along the south edge of Pond LP-26. 9. The proposed lots abutting Highway#3 shall dedicate a 30'wide drainage and utility easement on the final plat to allow for the extension of sanitary sewer and water main along Highway #3. 10. A water quality treatment pond (Pond LP-26.3) of at least 0.23 acres in surface area at the NWL, 0.7 acre-feet in wet pond volume, a minimum average depth of 3 feet, and a maximum discharge rate of 1 cfs shall be constructed to treat all runoff draining to Waterview Court. 11. The development will be required to stub 8"sanitary sewer and 8"water main to the south edge of the plat in the right-of-way of the proposed stub street. 12. The installation of sanitary sewer and watermain to serve this development must be authorized by the City Council prior to final plat approval. 13. The final plat shall dedicate a ponding and utility easement for Pond LP-26 and Pond LP-26.3 to an elevation 3' above the calculated HWL's of the ponds. • 14. The vacation of the existing right-of-way for Carol-Street is required prior to final plat approval. 15. The development shall financially guarantee the costs for the installation of all public utilities and streets necessary to service or accommodate the proposed development located beyond the boundaries of said development. 16. In order to final plat Lot 4 of Block Z a temporary cul-de-sac with a 45 foot radius shall be constructed at the south end of the stub street. Ji STANDARD CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL A. Financial Obljgations 1. This development shall accept its additional financial obligations as defined in the staff's report in accordance with the final plat dimensions and the rates in effect at the time of final plat approval. B. Easements and Rights-of-Way 1. This development shall dedicate 10-foot drainage and utility easements centered over all lot lines and, in addition, where necessary to accommodate existing or proposed utilities for drainage ways within the plat. The development shall dedicate easements of sufficient width and location as determined necessary by engineering standards. 2. This development shall dedicate, provide, or financially guarantee the acquisition costs of drainage,ponding, and utility easements in addition to public street rights-of-way as required by the alignment, depth, and storage capacity of all required public utilities and streets located beyond the boundaries of this plat as necessary to service or accommodate this development. 3. This development shall dedicate all public right-of-way and temporary slope easements for ultimate development of adjacent roadways as required by the appropriate jurisdictional agency. 4. This development shall dedicate adequate drainage and ponding easements to incorporate the required high water elevation plus three (3) feet as necessitated by storm water storage volume requirements. C. Plans and Specifications 1. All public and private streets, drainage systems and utilities necessary to provide service to this development shall be designed and certified by a registered professional engineer in accordance with City adopted codes, engineering standards, guidelines and policies prior to application for final • plat approval. • 2. A detailed grading, drainage, erosion, and sediment control plan must be prepared in accordance with current City standards prior to final plat approval. • 3. This development shall ensure that all dead-end public streets shall have a cul-de-sac constructed in accordance with City engineering standards. • • • 4. A separate detailed landscape plan shall be submitted overlaid on the proposed grading and utility plan. The financial guarantee for such plan shall be included in the Development Contract and shall not be released until one year after the date of City certified compliance. • D. Public Improvements 1. If any Improvements are to be installed under a City contract, the appropriate project must be approved by Council action prior to final plat approval. • E. Permits 1. This development shall be responsible for the acquisition of all regulatory agency permits required by the affected agency prior to final plat approval. F. Parks and Trails Dedication 1. This development shall fulfill its park and trail dedication requirements as recommended by the Advisory Parks, Recreation and Natural Resource Commission and approved by Council action. G. Water Quality Dedication 1. This development shall be responsible for providing a cash dedication, ponding, or a combination thereof in accordance with the criteria identified in the City's Water Quality Management Plan, as recommended by the Advisory Parks, Recreation and Natural Resource Commission and approved by Council action. H. Other 1. All subdivision,zoning and other ordinances affecting this development shall be adhered to, unless specifically granted a variance by Council action. Advisory Planning Commission City Council Approved: August 25. 1987 September 15. 1987 Revised: July 10. 1990 • Revised: - February 2. 1993 • LTS#5 S TANDARD.CON LOCATION PLAN • WTLEY ' ' Ca_ Rd.JO .tom 1 ........------ � `,tl'Ay61 N{,�,'//k 2;5 ' �,' _�■� ""'� --j�if ``/ `a 1 poi = 1411= I": re=0,0� �1' .ion i,.. �/ • ►� / ♦ _ -re �,i)i11 ui4' lbw w . .r±;• [. ii; 07—=IOU %.1 :��s i' :?iti •sue !,.,In �-..;11,1 ;0∎„.i;,,,,„ • . _ �l'�Z v id 1111 iV. i; t ,�,ti :,•_`iiit gi ,• rju� .,..... ,•��f=1� ,C r., ii ,L,. 4 l iii 4 i 11 nn •.i. ( nn 11 .. �' /�_ � G:7�t ,u�, hui►w `� u.l uG>t .0 ��L L� v uwe, %W.!, 1 II I ........ 1.■11,V. "11'.7",,iirS. 4'3 i a 41 rtn n. ,,,,,,li I-LJ ,.�` ■ 611 i�� � ': X1111111 `7�U li.:t.i tt ' -• � � A/1 W .tA 116 Nili1�i -- . ,.......... in firr -" l-i i11=1Wil I ,11 0 r......... RIPII NE ...,, .:• : ' - ' `,- ' li.4170 o� r ' It i'=► ,z 1■Iiimi FA N ROSEMOUNT ...1.M Mw • i k4 C) . Waterview Addition . . •.::. TvtivIrii____ter , i ...1 ii _ ,k , ., ...k, .. _ _iii..4 4 4 A - s') -1"471i 4) L) I - —WO' .i:-7/ -- --- • kii "' 04 NCI 5 P.4" 4-,1:11 6 ILA 4c59/13 ‘ , LOCATION • . NW 4D • iNi,nt E / f .Te • in I T •.• / 4. / ./. .....t / 1 ._ . .. . _..... I -- --..s.., itnn i/ •.. • ••• . . • , SW /I MI5 l ---==7.-—1•SE IIE • - - •••■•t t etv t tol.10•11■Will_Li it S'^g I —} I , 106- l• l . 4-: (i.1:1_111 .• \ I i ■.-......L■-■ A ZONING ., -, A ■' si/ _(1 c: D ir I L _.. . : A il A :1 444 ,.. Ell _ .. £3 IN • ___ L., . I ., 64kVial a 0 • ri-T-si Fiat:4 4. '07 (r-In / • ./.3 „ ki-, ■V'.3' f':al- f Mg , ' % _GUIDE PLAN . P T •. 011 I.-, 1 a• ' 04, .,,....1 4• tti, 1 , •:.,-i - ; . • ___...... ... , , . • OIMIIMMINNII. . ,t. i: 'gilt * tttit i a�• s...-- _��-- 3 41111 a jij lluii f tIii s s S f j oil iiiiip ,Iii t.i , 21 : iiii ii �. \\ i dig;eat si i ,14,[1! i \∎■ • ., N. - ...�Ce- - 1~ \ s \ 4 I �� \ • I \ 3 44..y `. ' ; \\ a M� 1�1 �: 3 , ' i fte:• / I a � • • 11 J i : #/ IJ it -- \ \ 1 ••I 1 I. : ;-4. - _ ` Oi •....N.. / 1 I' .4. i I �h,._.....„_____Tra.,.. , .....__ - i i ; I 1 ,:: ..t ,.. .::: .111111111Fr 1 . Id • IIII'llIlll"Illifflg'r. • :!ii '4 t i : ; 1.� g :% icf I IS ;' 4 ,I s IP y. 41, C y Z ll j i` / a • wt I 1 i , f ./ /a : 1 elli I :....; Il j •XN•... I i .... .• L._ t _sue __ E M, " . • �_•' M!f•Y U1 } M W ti. ......- t t._ 0000 W= :. 0 akji _ fa OHMS 4 JMO l 4'2- . ! j it ti,it 1: 3 #fl t d i - NHI .7Si i•• I iiltiui,,,,uk}•tsI v.!eiY:.is1:,,c, = r7-141 ! • _._;ts•:::air;:-:,•:ate'l:: s z • . ';5.-4> ...% ` i I J 1 I333;.t;3:::i111�:ti:j:::itt33II3 5; yy ,- •• •- • i 7jf 4414./•t' I.t:t t t . si! t t t i!•-'\\\ \`\ -'�_-`` -•- i I{, 1117.•::t1:::::::iitt:;:itith14liii'3ii;i;ilini Sit r _ E]j , � • \ � s4s_-i.._►fe=':f'a'r=iiksilkh?.fittlK4 !fYl.4iffitYsNfiiflkf 1: C� • • % .� \ t\ '.\. `.�"'<- {It 3333311;)i=ii ii3ii3it3t13ItIIIIII33iiIiillillllliillliiiti3 `§■ s'°1 \ ��\�M� 1, / 1�3 .a::a.s:•.::_: :.zss. :.s_ FS? :..,, , g �: • _ \`, is / ! 6i•i ti �;� ..•sa�f•- itF' _, i•..Ui,t.et t i'i s.�• Q �y illti7_=l , r-f _ \ ..-)ii:� ,s.ir 'r'.+:'a1:ir:I!F'::.tt� �i3liat:K:.1 �` +t••• w f�.� �1 _` ••`\� `• ' ' �� s►ssa:.:�ssf•.. ,.•:-....'z'.".y•.ii':... a:ii ii.}i'c1 $ i /i/ ' / _ �_ \ \\ :.∎ I ili33i3N ':ts. • I3ji3 3llli)333i13..31)�3333 Y / l \' �i3 \,��—�_`•` \ �� 'ti\ 's\ -•s.:,::Ins:.-:.i:.Ict.lsss-aa.su.....i nit uasas za.s 1 ' 'r • �' . '\ ■\\` :--, ∎� S is . • .,/ ) 1 ���» `\\\\ \_�\ ` • �I 1 • !..1,41_ • - �� `.`fit - - • • ..• ).-. ......., •• .. ........... . ..,„. ,, ,,,.....,. 'tiat ....'%.>. ..,,.'. 7.' . •// I �'/ .._ -mil ' -` . .� �.•, ; ti •�.... ._ . 4• •••-• ''' <2.1 .--ii,„, • di,' .\ � v,.....‘ 4 ff: freor /• , ffli:' P''' =;"'°' ;! . 04, d 11 ,' ' ' — •,1 ,- '. far t .Ii‘' fill//....r ' % 1 '• .01.11311 .; ill 1:40 Is...... . v., . / -• 411.1r . Ari.././'.....".\ ' -. . \ 'i 'A% r • 'il,"ILIX%-■ �-=� ∎ .` ' ' `1 'I - _ ' , A.. I .' �.� fit,. CS�a Ifi J 114° [A I' ' ur E . , i �r"�l' � I � /. . ((c! I . 3!jIl _. .. • 41 . 11 I , , ___ ... .... /4 . • I �y '`'�., ►4r`i4�'4•.��_t: � �;.--fi=r - - I' 4-„ ,,,o,. i 1 2.--_A-4,- I • •-, --- ..- --7441.,;,-,:hilkoo,,i! IPt%. O , ,..,,,,,, ,...L.,___A----r.:....,.. , 4 e-L al Z Alj 17141411V1:4`10 i E g 1 d■ i i ” '- 4...u• ••.......C.,.,,•: •.;,-...7..,„.::TIA if .."41443/4-TAt AU \\NJ" ,• ..• I.? lc.*'', 1,:i°.*%;:.-:'‘■_ __,._ rajani 1.79ZitC1/4 ■ . _ I % . .-i tn.,- r ---....-k.00,-----__,1/4.......a4:,... ........:14, TA: %...4.____,t- •__.... -... . - ti' ,', /.1.,?"v igati arivi limy - , ..--- , , 'r.'-tia--,,, --'71 --,11 ' t� _ / 1! ;j `•''1 • 0 `� • • ♦' -.i c ' ; ' `, - ICa3 1. lit ii Out . _ i".' !trill i � 41 � 1 • \ r• ....1=9- s 1 #41, 1.., �i s .,- .... ' 3 I I .--' r • • - c. 1 $ i ! ` ,/ 0 — q '• / ----t / 1/4 * • II! 4, if I*/ ,__, ril ... -1-;: tr LJ 1k; 1 / I L "*"""""'-'— j• III I 2 t.L., iiiii- I R r- j a li. kg sli I: i I II i } 4.- s= z ---- i cE.j I...__•- = s •�- ` s .... _.._ ............ W Z a �JI k..y , ...r. _ � � , 0 ---i--- ------If _ •M . `� J ZV +. uw 90 �. 04 " - "Tins 60 . ,� p...42 1 • • Iiii 891.3 --R-6 Sc. :°CI 2 LAKE h I6.2C 4N 12. I_ • 594.0 1,89,4.4. PAR l' a M1 R /8.0 [�7 4 4.4., 111_ ' 8478 '• . ou+Lir' ' • ; Ot'aiii-1.4R; - ;p. a rr `96 'i•-1 ! 4 75,vi 1717 l)1L i - •y4 _ it:d , ► , / LP-E .0 LP- -- 5 ' 3 3� - . 611. -I I .i _, p. T 918. v ! 1 - i I 1 ■ -30 92a.. )gg :i288,3-1Y'.r0, g' °�' 08.3 9646 ' • ,087=0 �1LB97 ` . > v�ail' i.1 rip., y- 6i /3.0 :--., 'P-45 ii ■/ nom,;- Q 7 ��: • Z AO }�'' w� ti = % LLp e.` • §24. 920;2 ,� �, • LP-24 _-: ,2� `9 "7D 922.;5 6, �. I 986:0 r' • f..7. 4/ , LP-27 i E .. cli)3: .'. -1.;.. ...._....H..f..1.....r. _. e . „. LP-I9 3 4�...- 1__ iw / .., .1 ,Ar. 1 ' k •eltHICti,. II) ;9841.02 12 0- --23_•- • 1 1 ' 930:0 f • ��'AA-17 LP-661 IP -�928.7 ( - y) 93/.O / a P 23 i (bi-.'" ; 11 • SITE . FIGURE No. 17 STORM SEWER LAYOUT LEGEND MONO - MAP ••••10.1.1 $?ONN L9'T 9TM1ew fn11NW • M01M IET 9TATMNI rwr G 9TONl1 PONCE ww • ♦••♦.• CITY OF 1 •POND N0NNAL Orma Lmm&L. . . . . . . 900.0 E A G A N 01 °OA Le J .j. � , • ' . LUrte, 9 F 1 / i• = .... 't' ...4. •=-L•':i.! If t � AYOITOR•s ftlllD. N0.• ;V:vItir..y'•,'.;1 s ,r'', f.to;_ _.A i �' C - L L ' N •1•' ='iii, ,V�'�9�r►9• --- • 1 ? sap.,4 i� -- •- -• - ••--•6 r', .• / . c Y C BB :=,r�..1 :" 'xi . , ,, i r.._R.''.,? W. .Lir • ' LAKESIDE PARK SCNwAN2 LE • AK /'..Fr , 1 .t•.T" .. rA P 1 ‘ \ �11.•,.;�• ,:▪J117vtt: T• �$�1...�1' rflt 1 • `-'5142,1\ ‘,.__, 41). . tit,....r.• -- .1.1, iti . ,-.\, , t • . -•:. -- ;0 _ ,, ,c..714, Is. ,: ,1,----.,:,/' 7.11.,t......;,:.;:`;`,;.. . $.1t*TdE 6 6 - • ' 12" C - E E r- ...„.........u, ...,,A., . .....i...,,,..,;,.A.::‘,..:...,,,,„:„..... .., . 0 1 � ___Ltuit._ Lim ,111All I -- i Lij, gol: i -: ,f rr -:\.-.100- e..,,. 1 *if 4. F F • ) r- , ..., 1 , _._ - _)\..,• , D• 0 , /?' ' K- o•• ' MAR�IZ E! t � AOD. �� G • - ` • i di . I jilt in R23w SITE. FIG. NO. 7 SANITARY SEWER TRUNK LAYOUT CITY OF . . EAGANçJ 1 I i In it PT. /i���, �p � MPuIi88g l8 • N ti�aip�'�; IHI 1 KESCE PORK l ' 2 �� 59.48 .0 SCHWA CARE 1T 755/9: r' -- �) "�`` PAR � .� �/ ,,,----. J " 0 4:40 IF2 a 'i \ t iv, Minn, • FA- (al _ 7 � lc ts� , i4.4 , 2I1 5441:9)" _ El t ow i!A... .1..v:, , 2.,A411-. :IT ass MP aill ill o . 10 !8 I .r -MI ax,' li, ,, ,_,,,,\,, millt-- J., • . ,..d -r-- lam t . ,e . "'"� -in ,„„..,:i 6 .2/91.0 0 "<,?.' ix 11, Inzg AROT4E _d8'it 8' to ADO. 4®X1.0 Ar6:6/:'?1.0 F R23W • SITE FIG. NO. 8 • . WATER DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM CITY OF • • EAGA ._ l'. 116 )42 '. . . . ini .1 ilif . gdII. i J i i • ---,i'll i ; ' ll a' tliiii::::illiPifili . ... s1/4; . 1 i 0 5 :::::::::::%;.:::.-...:" 4... . 1/4-• • ..' • . i 5 . . ... . -... 1 i 0 .off• . . d 4::::Iiici viiiiIiiggiN::":.. . . ..:V:::::::iiki:i1:?:•::::::*:,gi:iii:*.. I 1 .. ..:::......•.•:::::i:::::::::::.. .:.:::*::iiii::::::?Vi:iliMi.•:•:'. . I I a • .'ilii:i::::::::iiiii: •.....:.:iiiiiiigii::.:i n Itik i 'I ::::;:;:i:ra.:::::.:.:.: :::::,::::m . :- • . ;:mi:.:T: :::.:;:::qii.111 : - •:•:▪•:•:w.:0::: .:•:•ar'.• ' A Er ::•,.: F 4-- it i st -tti :,1:::::::::::::::::: ::iii lei iiiii Si tit - g o „by, •;"•:•::::ii• ::::ffliiii:.%. .*Y. •iiiii.4::iiiiiiiiii:::::::. :: 1 I , tilliki.giiiiii::;:::;fre/4i*::::::•::::%::•:•::iiiftiiiii*E.; :1:::: e:;:;:::..::: •:: ...:::,..:•:::iiii:i:;:;:;:*::. -, I 1 i . : i ti :: :ti :•:•:•:::::• :• : .,..• c:::::t:7 :.:4+e"::•••••••:::: :0.:.:. ::::::coo••••••:::::::c•:. 1 el t igili i:wry: 4::::Iiii :o.:::::ti •• �s � • ,� II gWv Page 16/EAGAN ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES NOVEMBER 23, 1993 PRELIMINARY PLAT, WATERVIEII ADDITION - . ARCON DEVELOPMENT, INC. Chairman Voracek opened the next public hearing of the evening regarding a Preliminary Plat consisting of 20 lots on 14.8 acres located along the east side of Dodd Road west of Highway 3 in Section 36. City Planner Sturm stated that the current owner had decided to discontinue Lakeside Animal Hospital presently on the subject property. He stated that the preliminary plat was revised to exclude the animal hospital and its access to Highway 3. He further stated that the revised preliminary plat vacates the existing Carol Street which would eliminate double frontage on 7 lots. Scott Johnson, president of Arcon Development Inc. , stated that the initial preliminary plat included 20 lots plus the animal hospital. He stated the animal hospital was removed in the revised plat. Mr. Johnson stated that there is currently no plat on the property and Carol Street was established 20 years ago and is now detrimental to the development of the property, making the lots along Carol Street very small. The development seeks vacation of Carol Street and this issue was addressed in several neighborhood meetings. Mr. Johnson stated that the proposed lots meet lot size requirements and the location of the proposed cul-de-sac has the least impact on the trees, saving 83%. He further stated the preliminary plat is in accordance with all regulations and requirements for drainage into the wetland - Fitz Lake. He concluded that he felt the proposed preliminary plat would blend well with the area. Doug Johnson, 4775 Dodd Road, expressed concern regarding heavy equipment traffic on Dodd Road. He stated that Dodd Road was not designed to hold heavy equipment traffic and such road has weight restrictions. Scott Johnson responded by stating that the proposed property has access from Highway 3 and he is agreeable to conditional approval of the preliminary P lat on the developer r accessin g the ro ert from Highway 3 and not Dodd Road. P P Y Ann Johnson, 4775 Dodd Road, had concerns regarding the proposed development. Ms. Johnson invited City staff and Commission members to visit the area. Nancy Gustafson, 4822 Dodd Road, inquired with City staff whether the guide plan was adopted before the existence of Lebanon Regional Park. Community Development Director Reichert stated that she / (*QCk Page 17/EAGAN ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES NOVEMBER 23, 1993 believed the park existed at the time the comprehensive guide plan was adopted. She further inquired as to whether the intersection of Dodd Road and Waterview Court could be controlled by 3-way stop signs. City staff responded that that would be an issue to be addressed at a later date with the County. Stuart Weirke, 4675 Dodd Road, stated he lives north of the proposed subject property. He stated that financially he is not bothered by the proposed development but is concerned about the heavy equipment traffic on Dodd Road. Member Heyl inquired with City staff as to the meaning of condition 115. Assistant City Engineer Foertsch explained that the financial obligations apply to the utilities within the boundaries of the development. Member Gorman stated that the issue of trunk connection charges needs to be addressed by the property owners with the City Council and the only issue is whether R-1 development is appropriate. He stated that R-1 is compatible with the area. Member Markley stated that he questioned the proposed development's compatibility and density. He stated that he favors less lots but acknowledges that the developer followed all standards and requirements. He suggested that the developer reexamine the proposed lot sizes. Scott Johnson replied by stating he wants to stay with the proposed preliminary plat. Member Markley stated that he would support the approval of the preliminary plat because it meets the standards. Member Wallace expressed concerns with the density, noting the lot sizes range from 12,000 to 85,000 sq. ft. Member Miller stated that he would like to see the developer work with the neighbors and that it may be "more pleasing to the eye for larger lots" especially on the east portion of the site. Member Heyl stated that she would have to support the preliminary plat as proposed. Member Hoeft stated that the developer had meet the standards but . he cannot support the proposed preliminary plat due to the lot sizes. Chairman Voracek asked Member Hoeft why his decision was not D • Page 19/EAGAN ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES NOVEMBER 23, 1993 6. Permits shall be obtained for the abandonment of the septic system in accordance with City of Eagan and State of Minnesota regulations. 7. The developer is responsible for complying with the Tree Preservation Plan as submitted which states that no mitigation will be required if 17% of the existing tree mass, or less, will be removed from the site. 8. The grading shall preserve a 30' buffer zone of undisturbed vegetation along the south edge of Pond LP-26. 9. The proposed lots abutting Highway 13 shall dedicate a 30' wide drainage and utility easement on the final plat to allow for the extension of sanitary sewer and water main along Highway 13. 10. A water quality treatment pond (Pond LP-26.3) of at least 0.23 acres in surface area at the NWL, 0.7 acre-feet in wet pond volume, a minimum average depth of 3 feet, and a maximum discharge rate of 1 cfs shall be constructed to treat all runoff draining to Waterview Court. 11. The development will be required to stub 8" sanitary sewer and 8" water main to the south edge of the plat in the right-of-way of the proposed stub street. 12. The installation of sanitary sewer and watermain to serve this development must be authorized by the City Council prior to final plat approval. 13. The final plat shall dedicate a ponding and utility easement for Pond LP-26 and Pond LP-26.3 to an elevation 3' above the calculated HWL's of the ponds. 14. The vacation of the existing right-of-way for Carol Street is required prior to final plat approval. 15. The development shall financially guarantee the costs for the installation of all public utilities and streets necessary to service or accommodate the proposed development located beyond the boundaries of said development. 16. In order to final plat Lot 4 of Block 2, a temporary cul-de-sac with a 45 foot radius shall be constructed at the south end of the stub street. ( � • Page 18/EAGAN ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES NOVEMBER 23, 1993 arbitrary to which Member Hoeft responded his decision was not arbitrary because: (1) area in which the proposed development is located is unique in. character; (2) the existing area has 3-5 acre lots and the proposed lots would not be compatible; (3) the proposed development would require a transition; and (4) the area backs up to a park making it unique. Member Miller concurred with Member Hoeft. Member Markley questioned whether the east lots could be combined to increase lot size. Scott Johnson responded by stating that those lots are already wide lots, being greater than 100 feet. He stated that he would sit down with City staff to see if there are "incentives" to increase lot sizes. Member Wallace inquired whether the developer's financial obligations include connection charges. . He raised issue with the developer's financial obligation for sewer and trunk charges totally approximately $12,000 and $15,000.00 respectively, whereas a property owner owning 5 acres would be charged approximately $15,000.00. • Chairman Voracek stated that based on that information property owners would be forced to subdivide. Heyl moved, Miller seconded, the motion to approve a Preliminary Plat consisting of 20 lots located along the east side of Dodd Road west of Highway 3 in Section 36, subject to the following conditions: 1. These standard conditions of plat approval as adopted by Council action on February 2, 1993 shall be complied with: Al, 81, 82, 83, 84, Cl, C2, C3, D1, El, Fl, G1 and H1 2. All Shoreland Zoning regulations shall be met. • 3. Individual lot tree preservation plans shall be prepared on Lots 4-11 and Lot 20, Block 1, at the time of building permit application. 4. Lakeside Animal Hospital shall cease operations prior to initial construction. S. Permits shall be obtained for the abandonment of the operational well in accordance with Dakota County and State of Minnesota regulations. 1711 • • • Page 20/EAGAN ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES NOVEMBER 23, 1993 17. No construction equipment shall take access from Dodd Road. All access shall be taken from Highway 3. Voracek, Markley, Miller, Heyl, Gorman. Wallace, Hoeft. • Passed 5-2. • MEMO city of eagan DATE: DECEMBER 6, 1993 TO: TOM HEDGES, CITY ADMINISTRATOR WROM: KEN VRAA, DIRECTOR OF PARKS AND RECREATION SUBJECT: WATERVIEW ADDITION The Advisory Parks Recreation and Natural Resources Commission reviewed the above referenced item at their December 3, 1993 meeting and make the following recommendations to the City Council relative to Waterview Addition: 1. This proposal will be subject to a cash parks dedication. 2. This proposal will be subject to a cash trails dedication. 3. This proposal will be subject to the developer providing on-site ponding to meet water quality treatment requirements. This pond shall have a minimum average depth of 3 feet and a wet pond volume of at least .7 acre feet. 4. The design of the wet pond must be approved by City Water Resources staff. 5. Filling or draining of the wetland is prohibited. 6. The developer shall install permanent monuments identifying the boundary of the protected shoreland zone. • 7. The Advisory Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission acknowledges that the Waterview Addition preliminary plat tree preservation plan complies with the City's Tree Preservation Guidelines and the developer will not be responsible for tree replacement provided that no more than 27 trees, as are now identified, are removed. KV:cm cc: Marilyn Wucherpfennig, Planning Aide Ed Kirscht, Engineering Technician 4 • Agenda Information Memo December 21, 1993 City Council Meeting EG1SLA'iivEI #JTAiRS IIATC COUNTY BONDING AUTHORITY/JUVENILE DETENTION & TREATMENT FACILITY A. Resolution in Support of Dakota County's Request for State Bonding Authority,Juvenile Detention and Treatment Facility--Enclosed on page is a copy of correspondence received of Dakota County Commission Chair Steve Loeding requesting City support of the County's effort to secure state bonding authority to construct a juvenile detention and treatment facility within the community. Also enclosed on page is a copy of the resolution in this regard. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny a resolution supporting state bonding authority for Dakota County for a juvenile detention and treatment facility as presented. DAKOTA COUNTY OFFICE BO THE (612)438-4418 DAKOTA COUNTY GOVERNMENT CENTER 1560 HWY.55- HASTINGS,MINNESOTA 55033 Ir--IV . Y. DEC November 23, 1993 The Honorable Thomas A. Egan, Mayor Eagan City Hall/Municipal Building 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55122 Dear Mayor Egan: Dakota County is in the process of planning for a juvenile detention and treatment facility. The County is fast growing - and, to this point, we have had no County juvenile detention and treatment facility. The County purchases detention and treatment beds from other counties. County staff have studied this issue for the past year and are recommending that a 48-bed regional facility be built in Dakota County. No decision regarding location of the facility has been made. The purpose of this correspondence is to ask for your endorsement and support to pursue state bonding authority for the construction of a juvenile detention and treatment facility. A resolution from your Council supporting our efforts would be useful to us in the legislative process. Enclosed is a draft resolution for your use. Please call if you have questions. We would appreciate a response by December 30, 1993 so we can prepare our legislative request. Sincerely, IC5AJC:;E4 Steven G. Loeding, Chair Dakota County Board of Commissioners (/: 5;l7) AN EQUAL PPORTUNITY EMPLOYER RESOLUTION SUPPORTING STATE BONDING AUTHORITY FOR DAKOTA COUNTY JUVENILE DETENTION AND TREATMENT FACILITY City of Eagan WHEREAS, the Dakota County Board of Commissioners wishes to pursue state bonding authority for the funding of the construction of a Dakota County juvenile detention and treatment facility; and WHEREAS, a facility is needed to meet present juvenile detention and short- term needs; and WHEREAS, stat e bonding authori ty is available through existing Minnesota Statute for the construction of a regional facility; NOW,THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED that the City of Eagan supports the building of a juvenile detention and short-term needs locally; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City of Eagan supports Dakota County's effort to secure state bonding authority for the construction of a juvenile detention and treatment facility in Dakota County. CITY OF EAGAN CITY COUNCIL By: Its Mayor Attest: Its Clerk Motion made by: Seconded by: Those in favor: Those against: CERTIFICATION I,E.J. VanOverbeke, Clerk of the City of Eagan, Dakota County, Minnesota, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted by the City Council of the City of Eagan, Dakota County, Minnesota, in a regular meeting thereof assembled this 21st day of December, 1993. E. J. VanOverbeke, City Clerk tri t r%�� :K^ )rte'Y'tC, Y Ru,e. (7.--- l 9TH n' �F.G�V .c r � .,x S �x v <, tiw L ^ .r.ii ray :x 'a�. ,?-:' city of ccgcln Report for Cedar Grove No. 7,8,10,11 and Ken Applebaum Addition 0121 Street and t)sji‘fert c Utility Reconstruction City Project No. 662 Eagan, Minnesota December 1993 File No. 49545 inBonestroo Rosene • liAnderllk & Associates Engineers d Architects St. Paul, Minnesota Otto G.Bonesnoo.P.E. Howard A.Sanford.PE. Michael P.Rau.P.E. Mark D.Wallis.P.E. Bonestroo Robert W.Roane•P.E' Keith Gordon.PE. Philp J.Pyre.P.E. Miles B.Jensen.P.E. Joseph C.Anderlik.P.E. Robert R.PlRerle.P.E. Agnes M.Ring.A.I.C.P. L.Phinip Gravel M.PE. �" Marvin L.Somata.P.E. Richard W.Foster.P.E. Thomas W.Peterson.P.E. Karen L.Wlerred.P.E. Rosene Richard E.Turner.P.E. David 0.Loskota,P.E. Michael C.Lynch.P.E. Gary D.Kristo(itz P.E. • il Anderlik & GAR ECook.P.E. Robert C.Russek.A.I.A. James R.Maland.P.E. F Todd Foster,P.E. Noyes.P.E. Jerry A.Bouillon.P.E. Jerry D.Pertzsch.P.E. Keith R.Tapp P.E. Associates Robert G.Schunicht P.E. Mark A.Hanson.P.E. Kenneth R Anderson.P.E. Douglas J.Benoit PE. • Susan M.Ebernn.C.P.A. Michael T.Rautmann.P.E. Mark R.Rolls.P.E. Shawn D.Gustafson.P.E. *Senior Consultant Ted K.Field.P.E. Mark A.Sea.P.E. Cecnio Olivier.P.E. Engineers & Architects Thomas R.Anderson.A.I.A. Gary W.Morten.P.E. Charles A.Erickson g Donald C.BurgardL P.E. Daniel J Edgerton.P.E. Leo M.Pawelsky Thomas E.Angus.P.E. Allan Rick Schmidt.PE. Harlan M.Olson Ismael Martinez.P.E. Philip J.Caswell.P.E. James F Engelhardt December 17, 1993 Honorable Mayor & Council City of Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55122 Re: Cedar Grove No. 7, 8, 10, 11, and . Ken Applebaum Addition Street and Utility Reconstruction Project No. 662 Our File No. 49545 Dear Mayor and Council: Attached is our report for the Cedar Grove No. 7, 8, 10, 11, and Ken Applebaum Addition, Street and Utility Reconstruction, Project No. 662. This report discusses the proposed street and utility reconstruction and presents costs estimates for these improvements. Also included is the estimated assessment rate per lot. We will be pleased to meet with the City Council and other interested parties to discuss this report at a mutually convenient time. Yours very truly, 4 BO ESTRO ROSENE, ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES, INC. Gi,,N. Gz n/J,------ Mark A. Hanson I hereby certify that this report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Registered Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Min) esota Reviewed by: Mark A. Hanson Eagan Public Works Dept. Date: December 17, 1993 Reg. No.. 14260 Date: Reviewed by: 1 Finance Department Date: 49545.rpt . 2335 West Highway 36 • St. Paul, MN 55113 • 612-636-4600 CITY OF EAGAN CEDAR GROVE NO. 7, 8, 10, 11 AND KEN APPLEBAUM ADDITION STREET AND UTILITY RECONSTRUCTION PROJECT NO. 662 TABLE OF CONTENTS Item Page Number LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS 2 INTRODUCTION 3 SCOPE 4 FEASIBILITY AND RECOMMENDATION 4 STREET EVALUATION 6 DISCUSSION 11 Street Improvements 11 Storm Sewer 16 Sanitary Sewer and Water Repairs 20 COST ESTIMATE 20 AREA TO BE INCLUDED 21 ASSESSMENTS 22 REVENUE 23 PROJECT SCHEDULE 23 APPENDIX A - PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE APPENDIX B - PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL 49545rp► 4 STREET AND UTILITY RECONSTRUCTION • INTRODUCTION: The City of Eagan similar to other communities is responsible for providing utilities and streets to serve existing and new developments. The City officials and its Public Works Department are also responsible for maintaining and upgrading these facilities as they approach the end of their useful design life. Typically, utilities have a design life of 40 to 80 years dependent upon how they've been maintained and constructed while streets have a design life of 20 to 25 years. The design life for streets is considerably less due to the nature of the materials that are used to build them and deterioration resulting from weather and traffic. Local streets and utilities serving Cedar Grove No. 7, 8, 10, 11, and Ken Applebaum Addition were constructed privately, approximately 20 to 25 years ago, with gravel and bituminous sections which do not meet today's standards. Therefore, the streets in this area have exceeded their useful design life and are in a condition where street reconstruction should be considered. It's also important that all homeowners and City officials know and are confident that these facilities are being maintained and replaced at the most opportune time and at a reasonable cost for the longest period of time. In an attempt to better inform homeowners of the condition of their streets, the City of Eagan recently had structural and surface evaluations done on the streets in Cedar Grove No. 7, 8, 10, 11, and Ken Applebaum Addition. The results of the evaluations are presented in this report to help homeowners better understand the condition of their streets. These evaluations are based on technical and objective observations made by representatives trained in this work. 49545rp1 3 SCOPE: This project provides for reconstructing 5.2 miles of existing streets in Cedar Grove No. 7, 8, 10, 11, and Ken Applebaum Addition as shown on Figure No. 1. A breakdown of length of street per subdivision is listed below: Cedar Grove No. 7 2.5 miles Cedar Grove No. 8 1.8 miles Cedar Grove No. 10 0.1 miles Cedar Grove No. 11 0.6 miles Ken Applebaum Addition 0.2 miles Also included is the construction of new storm sewer and upgrading portions of the existing storm sewer system. Improvements are also proposed to the existing sanitary sewer and water main systems. FEASIBILITY AND RECOMMENDATIONS: This project is feasible from an engineering standpoint and is presently identified in the City's current 5 year Capital Improvement Plan. The project can best be carried out combined with a similar contract. 49545rpt 4 t YANKEE DOODLE ROAD 11 A .Or cp litP . tali 0 0 IllirAdt*J1 4 s'i. •.,�. � 1ISSSn prior 4,. Inloss ow I<wsurs! Cil t, +Ilrsr:is"1.1 lik A j tea_ , 7ra' _ le. f -r� i *I ,- BEI- ).P9W 4 reurinit,,*kir.T. y1.v� � scTUtx.. ill►s `.�. ' ■ al" 6 111 NOVI{. TIE 141. ~ \'v a 1 a•y 3.ttlr. "lb. .4 "I' i/V 0 ;0". 4 die !t Mn. Millir V ..4.wit. ,.rt-estr■r..r b . eit ttti° •�} li Fe :; w;ittu• . "!f'�"1�",A! ..tt,. ■167-461.! �T..���i i t j 1 let -711114e �� •r.•+s;Rr � .i�.el.Ir+�•�■• Fe t+rr 4-4-40.441,4 v* .#t.As. •.Tel ttrtAi . s. rr ., :S rt �.� +r...#.. l Pr i1 i rir srrt+rt":4.1 JEka --.:-:r• ..31111:nit i 1.::::::: f.i11i 16,„. ri +yr4Jtn1:ra.r.:sasmw...... 1�� 1 t)O ,.,t rr htj t444,t1' .... •. 4 71...;,<N014,4,, « �'4;4*r.17,,,i': R .■ j !fir.. x= R. � ir Ihi ttA# H. DIFFLEY ROAD Co. Rd. 30 KEN APPLEBAUM ADD. CEDAR GROVE No. 7 N 0 ,000 2000 Iiiiiin Scale In feet LOCATION PLAN iji Bonestroo Rosene vi Anderlik & EAGAN, MINNESOTA FIGURE 1 Associates CEDAR GROVE No. 7,8,10&11 & CITY PROJ. No. 662 KEN APPLEBAUM ADDITON 49545F06.DWG NOVEMBER 1993 COMM. 49545 , STREET EVALUATION: The streets in Cedar Grove No. 7, 8, 10, 11 and Ken Applebaum Addition are proposed to be reconstructed as part of this project. The justification for street reconstruction is based on the following: - Street Age - Structural Strength - Surface Condition - Long Term Maintenance In accordance with engineering standards, the anticipated life of a properly built pavement is 20 to 25 years. As previously mentioned, the life of a street is based on the materials used to build it and the rate of deterioration due to traffic and weather. The streets in Cedar Grove No. 7, 8, 10, 11, and Ken Applebaum Addition were built from 1969 to 1973. Therefore, each street has approached the end of it's design life based on its age. The desired structural strength of a local street is 7 to 9 ton design. The heavier design thickness is recommended due to the size and number of services vehicles (garbage trucks, school buses, etc.) presently serving residential neighborhoods. In the case of the streets in the Cedar Grove Additions, the recommended overlay thickness for all streets ranged between 11/2" to 21/2" based on the test results. This structural testing was accomplished by use of the Road Rater which is an electro-hydraulical device which imposes a load to the roadway and measures its deflection. Based on the measured deflection, a recommended equivalent overlay thickness is determined to prevent the deflection based on the required load. The final and most important consideration for evaluating an existing street is its surface condition. The Pavement Condition Index(PCI)ranks the surface condition of each street. Table 1 presents the categories which define PCI Rankings. Table 1 PCI MAINTENANCE REQUIRED 55-100 Routine (Crack Seal/Seal Coat) 35-55 Patch/Repair and/or Overlay 0-35 Reconstruct 49545rp1 6 In general, PCI Rankings below 35 require removal of the existing bituminous pavement before constructing a new bituminous surface. In some cases, based on soil borings, the existing aggregate base may also have to be reconstructed. PCI Rankings between 35 and 55 require spot patching before constructing a bituminous overlay. PCI Rankings over 55 typically don't require bituminous overlays and generally routine maintenance such as crack sealing and seal coat is still adequate for the short term. Figure No. 2 shows typical PCI Rankings over the life cycle of a street. As noted on Figures No. 3, 4, and 5, many of the PCI Rankings are below 35. In summary, based on the age, structural strength, and surface evaluation of the streets in Cedar Grove No. 7, 8, 10, 11, and Ken Applebaum Addition street reconstruction is required. 49545,0 7 t I NUMBER VERBAL CONDITION TYPICAL MAINTENANCE RATING RATING GROUPING NUMBER RATING REPAIR —100------ COST/Sq .Yd . Excellent ■aaa —90 Pavements that Typical Street Life have little or — 80 no distress. N. Seal Coat ($0.45-$0.80) Very Good \\ (50-100) Z. Pavements that hove \ O —70 a significant level \\ I— of distress. \ non-load related. \ Z — 60 Good Pavements that have \\ O a significant level ■ U of distress. H- —50 load related. ■ Z Overlay ($2.00-$7.00) W Fair (30-60? w -40 ■ QPavements that have \\ a Poor major distress. \ " -30 \ \ Reconstruction \($9.00-$15.00) —20 Very Poor Pavements that have (0-40) \e significant amounts Na of major distress. a e — 10 .a 0 Failed 3 1 I5 (YEARS) 20 25 STREET LIFE CYCLE n Bonestroo Rosene EAGAN, MINNESOTA FIGURE 2 Anderlik & CEDAR GROVE No. 7,8,10,11 Associates & KEN APPLEBAUM ADDITION CITY PROJ. No. 62 L:\49\49545\49545F99 DECEMBER 1993 COMM. 49545 r BLACKHAWK ROAD - . I -, 6 1 gal '"1 I ONIIE PT; 1 64 im el --, -, , MIIII __, vow g,t, ......„ AV W-11 LI I --—— 1 ,,Z-. ._._. —1-1 111171W ilk 0 PER/D0 PATH \---- ‘ Kit,"CINNABAR IDR 1--- 1- It , -, e , Ls„,.. r---. . og 111D-----\ WI . i I G,N 'MAG Ts i CO I 0P01T E 1 OAK 1 1- mpg ___1* . E ij-- .-^.,,,. l n I-�-� Z s --i i- . 01iii ct PUMI"' LA I ® e 0 150 300 1 11111111 Se in feet 1 I I PCI INDEX CI JJBonestroo Rosene is Anderlik b EAGAN, MINNESOTA FIGURE 3 Associates CEDAR GROVE No. 7, CITY PROJ. No. 662 49545F03.DWG DECEMBER 1993 COMM. 49545 . ■ .. ----1 i 1 i 1 .,..c,,,,i . ., I f a�� lioht..:,. -.7......-1-,......,...„1 riTZE CT: ; ,. , e i ........_ I I I • 111040,4140$1.,_„„ , --.41-.--;,_i . 1 , ,,i, ,, i ® :� fip,,, � •c 4w ' u I ... • -- COCH• 1 a IV --i. IL:' PORT gRCL£ ' 1P'e .m OK' ' 61 I! "I— rD-1---‘ opi : 0 _____I ri.r...wl ‘ i . (0 ; ' i 0 AVM ilD jI J i I I ; 4 • ` i * 1 ____. ( 12 24 ,' T,,, ' = I — --03 i 1 1 W= l I DEERWOOD I DR I I I I 0 150 300 Scale In feet PCI INDEX ® zi Bones troo Rosene • li EAGAN, MINNESOTA FIGURE 4 Anderlik &s Associates CEDAR GROVE No. 8 & 10, CITY PROJ. No. 662 49545F01.DWG DECEMBER 1993 COMM. 49545 • I ri SILVER BELL ROAD I 1 I mirei - -4 lim . . ti i c„\. 'MI'a : 1 F.- � � L� � „wet C/R 1 ._..._..� CO4/NTRy,CREEJ w.y I WS .``� 1 0 1 _... N I os 1 I I 1 11- ..- J 0 150 300 Scale in feet I I W WJADE LA AID KEN APPELBAUM _ N 0 150 300 Seel* in feel PCI INDEX ) ja Bonestroo Rosene EAGAN, MINNESOTA FIGURE 5 Anderlik b Associates CEDAR GROVE No. 11 & CITY PROD. No. 662 KEN APPLEBAUM ADDITION 49545F02.DWG DECEMBER 1993 COMM. 49545 DISCUSSION: Cedar Grove No. 7, 8, 10, and 11 Street Improvements: Streets proposed to be improved in Cedar Grove No. 7, 8, 10, and 11 are identified on Figures No. 6, 7, and 8. The existing street section in Cedar Grove No. 7, 8, 10, and 11 is presented on Figure No. 9. The existing street section incorporates a 32' wide street with surmountable concrete curb and gutter. Street construction proposed herein for Cedar Grove No. 7, 8, 10, and 11 includes removal of the entire bituminous surface between the concrete curbs. A new 3" thick bituminous pavement is proposed to be constructed on a new 3" thick aggregate base as presented on Figure No. 9. The existing aggregate base will be checked for thickness and test rolled. If additional aggregate base is required, it will be added as directed by the Engineer as discussed earlier. It's assumed a new 3" thick aggregate base will be placed on all streets. It's also estimated 9,500 lineal feet of concrete curb and gutter will be reconstructed due to its condition (approximately 34% of total). It's also assumed all catch basins and leads will be removed and reconstructed. Driveway repair will be required where concrete curbs are repaired at each driveway. Sanitary sewer manhole and gate valve box adjustment is also required. Streets proposed to be improved in the Ken Applebaum Addition are identified on Figure No. 8. The existing street section in the Ken Applebaum Addition is presented on Figure No. 9. The existing street section incorporates a 32' side street with surmountable concrete curb and gutter. Due to the poor condition and flat grades of the concrete curb on Jade Lane, street construction proposed herein for Ken Applebaum Addition includes removal of the entire bituminous surface and concrete curb and gutter. New B618 concrete curb and gutter in conjunction with a new 3" thick bituminous pavement constructed on a new 3" thick aggregate base is proposed to be constructed as presented on Figure No. 9. Due to the new concrete curb and gutter construction, driveway, and boulevard restoration is required. Driveway restoration will include reconstructing the bottom portion of the existing driveway. The driveway will be reconstructed of the same material (bituminous or concrete). Sanitary sewer manhole and gate valve box adjustment is also required. 495451,1 12 BLACK AW ROAD • ---rA A N A i/ iaraa� aa aa aaaaaars; ""•••,,,„... _ 11101111111.111 I I. .446.1\11 5' 2 f T ONItE PT i N o le o o a:. O O ys PROPOSED STREET e � WIDTH REDUCTION _ ,. . �r N .�.r..�* i ''17,%'*.,;.a.- ' ;,,.,,.!.,.4., ',: 7 .,,,,,,, , Aiii-�.+��a Ili , IrE LA " „ a K N n f a CEDAR GROVE —3 " N N " NO. N N dP " N N " i ). INa 'I M;GIETI „ 1 /j .4 5 8 N N I N POI „ 4'. 1 "...2 It2 ,s;,,,,,,..0 - el ' ", . ` a I i LIMONITE 1111411W '' m r �` DINE 1O N I N h • a S3 LT�i S N v. 'w""" "711 " d --1 71s. ..., .. ;:, p. O ! 5 N . 1 " ` (5 F.45 _IA a I D: ' ^ N .1 ■" I paw. ......0 ---- — Z,....... —1 n : :... f Y 1." ' 1 4_ , IX7. N :5 I N 0 150 300 el r) N „ n Sour. In fait I . 3 „it sai uai# as /iia ruira.II mere roue, iT Iaa I 1 ! i LEGEND I 1 I DRIVEWAY LOCATION • STREET IMPROVEMENTS ASSESSMENT AREA .aaaaa. kJ Bonestroo Rosene Anderlik 6 EAGAN, MINNESOTA FIGURE 6 Associates CEDAR GROVE No. 7, CITY PROJ. No. 662 49545F03.DWG DECEMBER 1993 COMM. 49545 • i as is a iaasasiaaa aaa�iiiaaaaaa f.. iasial C � * 6 l 5 2 1 1 12 `i'1• x`10 9 = ! 3 O £>f.✓ 11 ' _�.. 8 Not ,� r� 10 F as : '13 N_ S 12 ••••:<a 4 3. 2 �:: r, �,1 s �' S it,' n .. s ), 15 76 rm .I.. loom!yam -1 ..# . 4 t'` r..1 13 ``i1 2 I 1 : $ . 8 iHi2FIr 3 .. , } 3+ '"s t 8 i E, t 1 I kg ,, OMB • ] 3.3 • .. 5 •. 11 17 7 8 .:.20 21 �...I 6 r 1 Vic';>✓....._ .•�. /j +daaaiaia t0 ! gtr. •1 ' y Wi �f 9 z 24 ' t 9 -1----i....,5 23 22 10 ' ( 9 25 •.Med:4'T ROLE I 7 `1 a;;;;,`t..... 4 2:PeRr.' z , \If; --' '-''i a • 12 28 29 t 12 i ____Ii 13 14 I 15 7 27 VENPORTli 7 a I `::.:�:::VENU.:.: 11 t o ® 16 t Kx 1 F(( 1 A4ENUE F 9 i '1 6 5 4 13 2 1 f 1 • It AKNnCEULO A %+f - -.i``4"xk:a za^.t x '�'.s X 9..3'�°s, ;'"'s r a' „= x.>. , az as,�:.x...-,;z gar'...._.... .. :�,,: :.,....»...,. a fi 2 �`� _.R 6 Sad, 6 1 7 18 7 8 9 10 + t l• 19 3 ( . ` ▪ 5 4 3 2 1 6 5 4 3 2 1 t' it i o m ▪ - W AVE I :LI it .t., , :•••••• • ksrf;'�:>'<: f'.°r�.>.:.�,.:�.,x:, .>.r..s�'�:.h"�"s`z.:xn'w.:m.F, a'?rw;::1't.:=Se�id i�.:4&`�r...''.�_..K'..�.°.'`:!�'' �„�.. �°AU'�,�V?5�ro� ';saz%x;;w '�`r`��f�;$vw>�...ia1. tk3':�..�`�,1'��'�`'�-ra..:.. .�;. '....."■ . i r 8 13 14 1 15 16,•-. 17 18 19 . 20 21 22 23 24 ,,:' r ( r T ?sal MI.i . . a a'Maai iaa , • a '---- .......? » el 12 1 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 1 3 2 1 , , 4 8 N 'V 1 _ : zeta iFtitraiaiai* LEGEND 0 150 300 DRIVEWAY LOCATION stole In feet ' ASSESSMENT AREA iiiiiiiia STREET IMPROVEMENTS JJBonestroo Rosene Anderlik 3 EAGAN, MINNESOTA FIGURE 7 VI Associates CEDAR GROVE No. 8 & 10, CITY PROJ. No. 662 49545F01.DWG DECEMBER 1993 COMM. 49545 C.^• A lO. Parcel Parcel 031-01(2 Units) I a fell iii BE �taYiiY ,.� v 7 g » 10 fg.' . ajar 12 3 L.._.._... 3 a 15 � ---\' v i_.._ cii 1g 18 3 2 1 } 8 -1 20 1 c (S7bN C/R g p 7 8 g Q .,,,,_,,,; ... :<C 6 CO` WRY CREEK W'Y 1 - V 11 .._ a A 1- C".: 1 it 22 23 24 25 Z l 1 0 7 k 16 4 15 14 13 1 12 O VV i rasa a aai ■a re; , 1t nee I waaafisaa as Tures, i • 0 LEGEND DRIVEWAY LOCATION 0 150 300 ASSESSMENT AREA ■aaaUUUUaa■ Seale in feet REMOVE AND REPLACE ENTIRE LENGTH OF CURB & GUTTER TO IMPROVE ST{REET DRAINAGE I I t' flu owl. Law laa3+si€aao liaaaiaaadaa Imo O 13 12 11 10 9 a ( 7 6 5 4 3 . 2 1 Q JADE'. LA APl }} j R Al a. 1240F.F. • KEN APPELBAUM ' e aaaaafiiaf�aaaaaaaaaaaaa 6aaaaaaaaaaaaaasiiaaaaaaaa LEGEND N DRIVEWAY LOCATION ASSESSMENT AREA ■....u..... 0 150 300 Seale in feet STREET IMPROVEMENTS iii Bones troo Rosene • EAGAN, MINNESOTA FIGURE 8 Anderlik 3 11 & Associates CEDAR GROVE No. CITY PROD. No. 662 KEN APPLEBAUM ADDITION 49545F02.DWG DECEMBER 1993 COMM. 49545 32' _ 16' _ _ 16' Ex. Surmountable q Conc. Curb 1 1 2"—2 1/2" Bituminous Existing Aggregate Base (Variable Thickness) EXISTING SECTION CEDAR GROVE No. 7,8,10,11 and KEN APPLEBAUM ADDITION 32' 16' 16' Ex. Surmountabl Conc. Curb DESIGN GRADE l /6" CROWN L.Note: 1" Type 41 Bituminous Wear Course Remove existing bituminous 2" Type 31 Bituminous Base Course surface. Repair existing concrete curb & gutter 3" Additional Class 5 Aggregate Base as required. Salvage existing aggregate where feasible. PROPOSED SECTION CEDAR GROVE No. 7,8,10,11 32' 16' 16' DESIGN B618 CONC. C&G DESIGN GRADE 6" CROWN Note: l"- -- Remove existing bituminous 1" Type 41 Bituminous Wear Course and concrete curb & gutter. 2" Type 31 Bituminous Base Course Replace with new concrete 3" Additional Class 5 Aggregate Base curb and gutter. PROPOSED SECTION KEN APPLEBAUM ADDITION eonestroo TYPICAL SECTIONS • Rosene Anderlik� EAGAN, MINNESOTA FIGURE 9 11 Associates CEDAR GROVE 7,8,10,11 & CITY PROJ. No 662 Enptneers� Architects & KEN APPLEBAUM ADDITION Engi west Architects Highway ite is 49545F04.DWG DECEMBER 1993 COMM. 49545 St. Paul, Minnesota 55113 Storm Sewer: The existing storm sewer systems serving Cedar Grove No. 7, 8, 10, 11, and Ken Applebaum Addition were reviewed to determine their present capacity. In addition, the performance of the existing storm sewer system in each area was reviewed to determine if any major flooding has occurred since its construction. For the most part,the existing storm sewer systems have performed fairly well. It is proposed to reconstruct all the existing catch basin structures and some catch basin leads in each of the Cedar Grove Additions to bring them to City of Eagan standards. Also presented on Figure No. 10, 11, and 12 are new storm sewer extensions proposed from the existing storm sewer systems in Cedar Grove No. 7, 8, 10, 11, and Ken Applebaum Addition. The storm sewer extensions are recommended to improve intersection drainage and provide greater inlet capacity into the storm sewer system. In addition, the upstream drainage area beyond the recommended storm sewer extension is approximately 3 acres, which is an engineering standard for how far a storm sewer should extend into a drainage area. 49595rp! 17 r t 1 BLACKHAWK f ROAD --- . , _- _. H o _ -• 1 T' ON1.E PT] , i •ROPOSED flir 1 , STORM SEWER 5' —. PRQ'OSED 'DDITI I NAL —Ill. I I 1 1 -L. ..,/ ' I HAL.w V p.. `)t lTE SLA 1 a ctsi *A„,,,,a/it-r-i .1 -\\ \\ ....L....j AIR/ -s- i --_, I__ t 1" -"""""" -' ". - t "r -" III vc 11 .BAR DR -7r---- . 1 t t R . P P: p-O OS: -.41 GO ; 1 t.. `S1=0RM SEW. -, i i • MAG4ET7 f t { 1; 'PROF .�•S i DITINA ' POI T 1 • A - :A IN \ LA 1 i t is • ---1 -- ' 1°° i I -- " - i 1 LIM NI7E 1 t 1 _W *----------- L4 NE (-- .__......I I 1 1E11 } i I._ P:• 1� b ---- I H STOR S E" H:-.....:3.i IN t c Ut f �i ---- . z �,PR . i STORM R .. i PUM! LA i -Z 1 ,_ (, •._ I 1 o 150 300 �. Scale M feet I --•-- • j• ► I if STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENTS il Boneatro° Rosene • Til Anderlik 4 EAGAN, MINNESOTA FIGURE 10 Associates CEDAR GROVE No. 7, CITY PROJ. No. 662 49545F03.DWG DECEMBER 1993 COMM. 49545 . ----1 ' ' 1-`}n :, «,>7 ; . ,i„ • .. .4 II C.- PAUT • 44/1/744,-•(• • - imi M Mil B \\ Umi „., 1 t MI ..,.. ,-. A MI • • . i , 1 ill. J • v •' ' PORT dRCL£1 a °A , -'. VEN PRO OSE, ir_t ST RM S ER DAVENPORT_. A/QNAC£lt0 A '" 1 PROPOSED I ..1. PROPOSED SEWER OVE E . NE ; ! i i 1 4ARIE'L. AVE i ` 'Y N l 1 DEERiOOD IDEERiVODDR I i 150 300 Scots in toot STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENTS El Bonestroo Rosene • Anderlik b EAGAN, MINNESOTA - FIGURE 11 Associates CEDAR GROVE No. 8 & 10, CITY PROJ. No. 662 . 49545F01.DWG DECEMBER 1993 COMM. 49545 • Et SILVER BELL ROAD I\ ift. 1 ----1---E \ I /- `_- lia - -a-•S, D ADrITI0 ` •. ' o A CH Z j�{Et I 2 CO• - CRE W Y v L j , —4 1 tfiX. „...,4sr ' --0 Z 1 co r- 1 0 0 \'‘ ' N W i.� � °o i 1 4 J 0 150 00 Scale In feet 1 PRO() •ED CAT :H ' SIN i LI o JADe LA. OV. R . L NE D cc -iii. 1 - C _ PELBAUM N _r I KEN...AP W • Nj 0 150 Scale In feet Bonestroo STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENTS Rosene Anderlik b EAGAN, MINNESOTA FIGURE 12 Associates CEDAR GROVE No. 11 & CITY PROD. No. 662 KEN APPLEBAUM ADDITION 49545F02.DWG DECEMBER 1993 COMM. 49545 Sanitary Sewer and Water Service Reconstruct: Utility reconstruction includes minor improvements to the existing sanitary sewer and water system. These improvements include the removal of all 24" diameter sanitary sewer castings and replacing with new 27" diameter casting. The existing 27" diameter covers with pick holes will also be replaced with new 27" diameter covers with concealed pick holes. Many existing sanitary sewer manhole precast sections will be either added to or removed to increase or reduce the amount of adjusting rings on each structure. These adjustments are necessary for the depths of adjusting rings on existing manholes to fall within limits specified by the City. All existing gate valve boxes will be adjusted to match new street grades. In addition, 25 existing water shutoff valves serving each home are not properly working or can't be found. Therefore, it's proposed to repair all existing water shutoff valves which aren't working and locate those which can't be found and repair them if necessary. It's also proposed to remove and replace water main as shown on Figure No. 13 due to the poor condition of the water main pipe as evidenced by the relatively high amount of water main breaks in the area shown. COST ESTIMATE: A preliminary cost estimate is presented in Appendix A located at the back of this report which is summarized below: I. STREET A. Bituminous Street Improvements $1,184,880 B. Repair Existing Concrete Curb 327,730 III. STORM SEWER 126,270 IV. SANITARY SEWER AND WATER REPAIR 288.390 TOTAL $1,927,270 The total estimated project cost is $1,927,270 which includes contingencies and indirect costs. Contingency costs are estimated at 5% while indirect costs are estimated at 30% which include legal, engineering, administration, and bond interest. 49.545,1 21 r 1' . . .} j I I1 ' ` \ , !,J{ 1 N t h A 1 ---d rstE �' , Ni. . lit _ ". im ,i._. .,, , , ,, . 9. 1 , i I Y 'aF 1................ i :1.;:d Afro ,,.. 1 a . EAa r Ika il. / I 'ST(4G--1 COCHRANE AWN � EXISTING 6" WATER MAIN 1 1 .I WATER MAIN { t 1 r !I i _w i.. JJ� 1 ifs" i 1�� 1 ,a f01lI CIRCLE 1 • L I f Q4 PORT VEN . PR•PO D 6" MI EXISTING 16" WAT R MAIN °e�"' WATER MAIN " • 1 R JC ri \ACNUE 1_,JkINTIC.. a 0 Ayr' r _ I -' ' PROPOSED 6" w i „ ? ; WATER MAIN• N':= i ii CONSTRUCTION -TELL AVE — . 1 _...1 .k f, I )'Y EX I G 8" N IA WA ER t MAI 1 t - i ! DEERNOOD DR 1 i f O ,0 Scale in feel El Bonestroo IMPROVEMENTS WATER MAIN Rosene • TN Anderlik b EAGAN, MINNESOTA FIGURE 13 Associates CEDAR GROVE No. 8, CITY PROJ. No. 662 49545F98.DWG DECEMBER 1993 COMM. 49545 AREA TO BE INCLUDED: The area to be included for assessment purposes is presented on Figures No. 6, 7, 8, and are listed below: Parcel Description Number of Lots KEN APPLEBAUM ADDITION Block 1, Lots 1-13 13 Block 2, Lot 1 N/A CEDAR GROVE NO. 5 Block 9, Lot 2 1 CEDAR GROVE NO. 7 Block 1, Lots 1-35 35 Block 2, Lots 1-32 32 Block 3, Lots 1-3 3 Block 4, Lots 1-11 11 Block 5, Lots 1-38 38 Block 6, Lots 1-4 4 Block 7, Lots 1-12 12 Block 8, Lots 1-28 28 Block 9, Lots 1-24 24 Block 10, Lots 1-12 12 Subtotal 199 SE i/4 SECTION 20 Parcel 010-77 Carnelian Park N/A CEDAR GROVE NO. 8 Block 1, Lots 1 1 Block 2, Lots 1-11 11 Block 3, Lots 1-12 12 Block 4, Lots 1-16 16 Block 5, Lots 1-8 8 Block 6, Lots 1-29 29 Block 7, Lots 1-9 9 Block 8, Lots 1-12 12 Block 9, Lots 1-18 18 Block 10, Lots 1, 13-24 - 13 Subtotal 129 CEDAR GROVE NO. 10 Block 1, Lots 1-12 12 .rousrpr 23 CEDAR GROVE NO. 11 Block 1, Lots 3-18 16 Block 2, Lots 1-10 10 Block 3, Lots 1-7, 10-25 23 Subtotal 49 CEDAR GROVE NO. 12 Parcel 031-01 2 Parcel 081-01 4 Subtotal 6 ASSESSMENT: Assessments are proposed to be levied against the benefitted property in accordance with the City of Eagan's Assessment Policy for Street Reconstruction which is summarized below. A preliminary assessment roll is included in Appendix B located at the back of this report. All costs will be revised based on final project costs. Property Type Residential/Duplex All Other Assessed City Assessed City Bituminous Street Reconstruction 75% 25% 100% 0% Repair Existing Concrete Curb 0% 100% 0% 100% Storm Sewer 0% 100% 0% 100% Sanitary Sewer/Water Repair 0% 100% 0% 100% A summary of the cost/lot is listed below: Estimated Cost/Lot Cedar Grove 7, 8, 10, 11, and Ken Applebaum Addition Bituminous Street Reconstruct $2,073 Repair Existing Concrete Curb 0 Total $2,073 The homeowner will have the option at the time of the assessment hearing to pay the assessment in full following the assessment hearing or include the assessment as part of their property tax statement. If the assessment is included on their property tax statement, the assessment will be spread over 15 years and at an interest rate determined by the bond 4954s� 24 sale used to finance the project. If the assessment is spread over a 15 year period at an estimated 7% interest rate, the following payment schedule would result: Assessment = $2,073 Principal Interest Cost Per Cost Per Per Year Per Year Year Month 1st Year $138 $145 $283 $24 15th Year 138 10 148 12 REVENUE: A summary of revenue sources is listed below: Project Cost Revenue Balance I) Street a. Bituminous Street Reconstruction $1,184,880 $888,726 $-296,154 b. Repair Existing Concrete Curb 327,730 - 0 - -327,730 II) Storm Sewer $126,270 - 0 - -126,270 III) Sanitary Sewer/Water Repair $ 288,390 - 0 - -288,390 TOTAL $1,927,270 $888,726 $1,038,544 The anticipated project deficit is $1,038,544 which will be the responsibility of the major street fund and respective utility renewal and replacement funds. In addition to the above City costs, Carnelian Park is proposed to be assessed for their front footage abutting the street improvement which is estimated to be $13,151. PROJECT SCHEDULE Present Feasibility Report January 1993 Public Hearing February 1993 Approve Plans & Specifications March 1994 Award Contract April 1994 Substantial Completion Fall 1994 Assessment Hearing Fall 1994 First Payment Due w/Property Tax Statement Spring 1995 49545rp1 25 1 APPENDIX A Preliminary Cost Estimate Cedar Grove No. 7, 8, 10, 11 and Ken Applebaum Addition Street and Utility Reconstruction Project 662 I STREET A) Bituminous Street Reconstruction 98,800 SY Remove bituminous pavement @ $1.50/sq.yd. $147,000 8,500 CY Common excavation @ $7.00/cu.yd. 59,500 17,000 TN Class 5 aggregate base @ $7.50/ton 127,500 11,400 TN Bituminous base course @ $21.00/ton 239,400 5,700 TN Bituminous wear course @ $23.00/ton 131,100 4,900 GL Bituminous material for tack coat @ $1.50/gal. 7,350 260 SY Concrete valley gutter @ $30.00/sq.yd. 7,800 1 LS Traffic control @ $40,000.00/1s 40,000 1 LS Field office @ $5,000.00/Is 5,000 40 EA Remove/reconstruct existing CBMH/CB w/cstg. @ $1,400.00/ea 56,000 30 EA Adjust CBMH/CB precast structure w/cstg. @ $700.0 0/ea 21,000 30 EA Remove and replace CBMH/CB rings and cstg. @ $300.0 0/ea 9,000 350 LF 15" RCP storm sewer @ $24.00/lin.ft. 8,400 45 EA Adjust GV box @ $200.00/ea 9.000 Subtotal $868,050 +5% Contingency 43,400 $911,450 +30% Indirect Cost 273,430 TOTAL BITUMINOUS STREET IMPROVEMENTS $1,184,880 B) Repair Existing Concrete Curb 11,900 LF Remove concrete curb and gutter @ $4.00/lin.ft. $47,600 11,900 LF Concrete curb and gutter @ $10.00/lin.ft. 119,000 150 EA Driveway repair @ $400.00/ea. 60,000 4,500 SY Sod w/topsoil @ $3.00/sq.yd. 13,500 Subtotal $240,100 +5% Contingency 12,000 $252,100 +30% Indirect Cost 75,630 TOTAL REPAIR EXISTING CONCRETE CURB $327,730 59545.appx.a II STORM SEWER 2,500 LF 15" RCP storm sewer @ $25.00/lin.ft. $62,500 30 EA Standard MH/CB w/casting @ $1,000.00/ea. 30,000 Subtotal $92,500 • +5% Contingency 4,630 $97,130 +30% Indirect Cost 29,140 TOTAL STORM SEWER $126,270 III SANITARY SEWER AND WATER REPAIRS 30 EA Adjust MH precast section @ $640.00/ea. $19,500 120 EA Salvage existing casting @ $60.00/ea 7,200 120 EA Remove and replace rings and casting @ $300.00/ea 36,000 5 EA Locate curb stop and box @ $150.00%a. 750 24 EA Furnish and install curb stop and box @ $300.00/ca 7,200 100 LF 1" Copper water service @ $17.00/lin.ft. 1,700 4,300 LF 6" DIP water main @ $24.00/lin.ft. 103,200 15 EA 6" GV & box @ $500.00/ea 7,500 8 EA Hydrant @ $1,200.00/ea 9,600 2,000 LB Fittings @ $1.00/lb 2,000 65 EA Corporation stops @ $25.00/ea 1,630 65 EA Connect ex. copper water service @ $200.00/ea 13,000 4 EA Connect to ex. water main @ $500.00/ea 2,000 Subtotal $211,280 +5% Contingency 10,560 $221,840 +30% Indirect Cost 66,550 TOTAL SANITARY SEWER/WATER REPAIRS $288,390 59345.appx.a a . Appendix B Preliminary Assessment Roll Cedar Grove 7, 8, 10, 11, and Ken Applebaum Addition Street and Utility Reconstruction - Project No. 622 PARCEL DESCRIPTION NO. LOT COST PER LOT TOTAL EQUIVALENTS EQUIVALENT ASSESSMENT CEDAR GROVE NO,.5 Block 9, Lot 2 I..: 1 I 2,073 I 2,073 CEDAR GROVE NO 7 Block 1, Lots 1-35 35 2,073 72,555 Block 2, Lots 1-32 32 2,073 66,336 Block 3, Lots 1-3 3 2,073 6,219 Block 4, Lots 1-11 11 2,073 22,803 Block 5, Lots 1-38 38 2,073 78,774 Block 6, Lots 1-4 4 2,073 8,292 Block 7, Lots 1-12 12 2,073 24,876 Block 8, Lots 1-28 28 2,073 58,044 Block 9, Lots 1-24 24 2,073 49,752 Block 10, Lots 1-12 12 2,073 24,876 CEDAR GROVE NO. 8 Block l, Lot 1 1 2,073 2,073 Block 2, Lots 1-11 11 2,073 22,803 Block 3, Lots 1-12 12 2,073 24,876 Block 4, Lots 1-16 16 2,073 33,168 Block 5, Lots 1-8 8 2,073 16,584 Block 6, Lots 1-29 29 2,073 60,117 Block 7, Lots 1-9 9 2,073 18,657 Block 8, Lots 1-12 12 2,073 24,876 Block 9, Lots 1-18 18 2,073 37,314 Block 10, Lot 1 1 2,073 2,073 Block 10, Lots 13-24 12 2,073 24,876 ........... .... ... ........... CEDAR GROVE NO. 10 Block 1, Lots 1-12 I 12 2,073 24,876 CEDAR GROVE NO. 11 Block 1, Lots 3-18 16 2,073 33,168 Block 2, Lots 1-10 10 2,073 20,730 Block 3, Lots 1-7 7 2,073 14,511 Block 3, Lots 10-25 16 2,073 33,168 CEDAR GROVE NO. 12 Parcel 031-01 2 2,073 4,146 Parcel 081-01 4 2,073 8,292 KEN APPLEBAUM ADDITION Block 1, Lots 1-13 13 I 2,073 26,949 TOTAL 409 $847,857 49545/appr.h 1 TOTAL PARCEL DESCRIPTION FRONT FOOT COST/F.F. ASSESSMENT Ken Applebaum Addition Block 1, Lot 2 1284.45 $21.58 (2) $27,718 SE '/4 Section 20 Parcel 010-77 (Carnelian Park) 609.39 2138 13,151 TOTAL I I $40,869 (1) Rate equals 75% of bituminous street (888,660) minus assessment to Carnelian Park and Jade Estates ($888,660 - $40,869 = $847,791) divided by lot equivalents(409). (2) Front foot rate equals street cost for bituminous street ($1,184,880) divided by total front foot for bituminous street (27,456 x 2 = 54,912 F.F.) = $21.58/F.F. • 49545/app.b 4 O .d.iD<` s ,a ,1 city of cctgcin Report for Blackhawk Road Street and Storm Sewer Ds, '" Reconstruction City Project No. 665 Eagan, Minnesota December 1993 File No. 49546 Bonestroo • Rosene Anderllk & Associates Englnssra &Architects St. Paul, Mlnnssota Otto G.Bonestroa P.E. Howard A.Sanford.P.E. Michael P Rau.P.E. Mark D.Walvis.P.E. Ti Bonestroo Robert W.Rosen.PE' Keith A.Gordon.P.E. Philp J.Pyne.P.E. Miles B.Jensen.PE. Joseph C.Anderlik.PE. Robert R.PhRerie.PE. Agnes M.Ring.AJC.P. L.Phillip Gravel M.P.E. Rosen Marvin L.Somata.P.E. Richard W.Foster.P.E. Thomas W.Peterson.P.E. Karen L.Wiemeri.P.E. Richard E.Turner.P.E. David O.Loskota.P.E. Michael C.Lynch.P.E. Gary D.Kristofiz.P.E. IICIIII Glenn In Anderlik & R E.Noyes.P.E. Robert A.Bo�urdokn.P.E. Jerry D.Pertzsch.P.E. Keith R.Foster. Taappp.P.E. Robert G.SChu nichL P.E. Mark A.Hanson.P.E. Kenneth P.Anderson.PE. Douglas J.Benoit.PE. ■ Associates Susan M.Eberlin.C.P.A. Michael T.Rautmann.P.E. Mark R.Rohs.P.E. Shawn D.Gustafson.P.E. `Senior Consultant Ted K.Field.P.E. Mark A.Sell x P.E. Cecil()Olivier.P.E. Thomas R.Anderson.A.IA. Gary W.Mores.P.E. Charles A.Erickson Engineers & Architects Donald C.Buogardt.PE. Daniel J.Edgerton.PE. Leo M.Pawelsky Thomas E.Angus.P.E. Allan Rick Schmidt.P.E. Harlan M.Olson Ismael Martinez.P.E. Philip J.Caswell.P.E. James F.Engeitnarck December 17, 1993 . Honorable Mayor & Council City of Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55122 Re: Blackhawk Road Street and Utility Reconstruction Project No. 665 Our File No. 49546 Dear Mayor and Council: Attached is our report for the Blackhawk Road Street and Utility Reconstruction, Project No. 665. This report discusses the proposed street and utility reconstruction and presents costs estimates for these improvements. Also included is the estimated assessment rate per lot. We will be pleased to meet with the City Council and other interested parties to discuss this report at a mutually convenient time. Yours very truly, BO ST OO ROSENE, ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES, INC. 4/Mar A. Hanson I hereby certify that this report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Registered Professional Engineer under the laws of the Sta of inne o a. 4/(614-\ 64.4'‘.47 '---- Reviewed by: Mark A. Hanson Eagan Public Works Dept. Date: December 17, 1993 Reg. No. 14260 Date: Reviewed by: Finance Department Date: 2335 West Highway 36 • St. Paul, MN 55113 • 612-636-4600 CITY OF EAGAN BLACKHAWK ROAD STREET AND UTILITY RECONSTRUCTION PROJECT NO. 665 TABLE OF CONTENTS Item Page Number LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION 1 SCOPE 1 FEASIBILITY AND RECOMMENDATION 2 STREET EVALUATION 4 DISCUSSION 7 Street Improvements 7 Concrete Sidewalk and Bituminous 7 Storm Sewer 16 Sanitary Sewer and Water Repairs 21 Street Lights 21 EASEMENTS/PERMITS 22 COST ESTIMATE 23 AREA TO BE INCLUDED 24 ASSESSMENTS 25 REVENUE 28 PROJECT SCHEDULE 29 APPENDIX A - PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE APPENDIX B - PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL APPENDIX C - RESIDENTIAL EQUIVALENT STREET ASSESSMENT STREET AND UTILITY RECONSTRUCTION INTRODUCTION: The City of Eagan similar to other communities is responsible for providing utilities and streets to serve existing and new developments. The City officials and its Public Works Department are also responsible for maintaining and upgrading these facilities as they approach the end of their useful design life. Typically, utilities have a design life of 40 to 80 years dependent upon how they've been maintained and constructed while streets have a design life of 20 to 25 years. The design life for streets is considerably less due to the nature of the materials that are used to build them, the weather they're exposed to and the amount of traffic they experience. The condition of each facility is a concern from a public safety standpoint. Blackhawk Road and its utilities were constructed, approximately 25 to 30 years ago. Therefore, Blackhawk Road has approached the end of its useful design life and is in a condition when street reconstruction can be considered. It's also important that all homeowners and City officials know and are confident that these facilities are being maintained and replaced at the most opportune time and at a reasonable cost for the longest period of time. In an attempt to better inform homeowners of the condition of their streets, the City of Eagan recently had structural and surface evaluations done on Blackhawk Road. The results of the surface evaluations are presented in this report to help homeowners better understand the condition of their streets. These evaluations are based on technical and objective observations made by representatives trained in this work. SCOPE: This project provides for reconstruction of Blackhawk Road from Deerwood Drive to State Highway 13 as shown on Figure No. 1. Also included in accordance with the Comprehensive Trail System Plan is the construction of an 8' wide bituminous trail along the 49546.rpt 1 east side of Blackhawk Road between Deerwood Drive and State Highway 13. A 6' wide concrete sidewalk is proposed along the west side of Blackhawk Road from Deerwood Drive to Silver Bell Road. Blackhawk Road is considered a Community Collector in the City of Eagan. Property abutting Blackhawk Road for the most part is residential with the exception of Sky Hill Park, Blue Cross/Blue Shield, and Townview Townhomes located at Silver Bell Road. Two unplatted parcels are presently undeveloped and zoned Townhouse (R3) and Neighborhood Business (NB). New storm sewer and upgrading portions of the existing storm sewer system are also included. Improvements are also proposed to the existing sanitary sewer and water main systems as determined by Eagan Public Works. FEASIBILITY AND RECOMMENDATIONS: This project is feasible from an engineering standpoint and is in accordance with the 5 Year Capital Improvement Plan for the City of Eagan. The project as outlined herein can best be carried out as one contract. Blackhawk Road will be upgraded based on projected traffic counts. Street reconstruction costs estimated herein assumed an R value of 30 for the subgrade soil type. In the event, soil borings indicate a higher R value, reconstruction costs estimated herein may be reduced. 49546.rpt 2 LONE OAK ROAD Co. Rd. 26 tus .: 1 • 4 _ P is .�� t. ... N 7 • Yal NAN t,i,,,r Il,r ii . III 40,4110 a ' *I' 0 1000 2000 **tip •°4;! t O 1 i c Seas �� red • w • O • wii elm = , -- sa •NK=aitio,231 ROAD !....• ... ,El, Dui P' i g# LO ni k off L I j i A,* .,--- -� .G � At—I l\isA ,t, 1 III i . iniiiing 44/ I tr 41A111 y 1 i • �,, JLQ (� : 4,400, 1r" > tsas� � ' �; _. „fie . mazus, 40 l't a tr- • Nei- 00 0.*” 4'. 4 . .04 NI• °° N► 11. .7. tail . t r4ill► ►+ri S4. II ui 474 eitietttev..:=1."*A.swfeit 0144 ji! 4), • • �' �s�,� t stun � r :r-♦irA. 'SINE A .RAC!:... �s{>a. ���w w 1.44,i Ir► 4 •: I It •E►; P ' ,ay; -W •I.4 or its itimitett04. -•I ♦44.401'� tua:it 44,...,+Dt 't' ',r iilu > + Mir '• : •:*ti 4.0 ,,410, '� ► * # l 1 ,,P...ss.�W-. is *'• a� '' s t t1 s.s �4$*4;44i-in ltJill•• •.r 1 J ! at�w■ _'r 1 __ To :L 4 ��s 01.4 tlerrt♦P• It*rx : aM # r' ��:• . : : rrt :it * :r I -«.+ ... I v.0 • w woe,$ •ills 't'e.410#t'\. *4,10-". : `f lEEE llss3• w. °f s {Il L • no�•1.1i1 �v- ,�OJ. T 0 >RillttOtti##r irp ,il I y,<:r i CWW{1 its . II eras.,...as� •� Att. it,1 i.b. ..„..12,,,,,,,,m yr Asia .I 1w .,,,4„., ami_..._...c.•IR.. 3• _..._..._... DIFFLEY ROAD • LOCATION PLAN Al Bonestroo Rosene • vii Anderlik & EAGAN, MINNESOTA FIGURE 1 Associates BLACKHAWK ROAD CITY PROJECT No. 665 L:\49\49546\49546R01.DWG NOVEMBER 93 COMM. 49546 STREET EVALUATION: Blackhawk Road is proposed to be reconstructed as part of this project. The justification for street reconstruction is based on the following: - Street Age - Structural Strength - Surface Condition - Existing and Future Maintenance In accordance with engineering standards, the anticipated life of a pavement is approximately 25 years. As previously mentioned, the life of a street is based on the materials used to build it, the weather it's subjected to and the amount of traffic it experiences. Blackhawk Road between Deerwood Drive and Silver Bell Road is 24 years old and has exceeded it's useful design life based on its age. The desired structural strength of a Community Collector street is a 9 ton design thickness. In the case of Blackhawk Road, a bituminous overlay is recommended to comply with a 9 ton design. This structural testing was accomplished by use of the Road Rater which is an electro-hydraulical device which imposes a load to the roadway and measures its deflection. Based on the measured deflection, a recommended equivalent overlay thickness is determined to prevent the deflection based on the required load. The final and most important consideration for evaluating an existing street is its surface condition. The Pavement Condition Index (PCI) ranks the surface condition of each street. Table 1 presents the categories which define PCI Rankings. TABLE 1 PCI MAINTENANCE REQUIRED 55-100 Routine (Crack Seal/Seal Coat) 35-55 Patch/Repair and/or Overlay 0-35 Reconstruct 49546.rpt 4 In general, PCI Rankings below 35 require removal of the existing deteriorated bituminous pavement before constructing a new bituminous surface. In some cases, based on soil borings, the existing aggregate base may also have to be reconstructed. PCI Rankings between 35 and 55 indicate a pavement is reasonable adequate, however, patching is required before constructing a bituminous overlay. PCI Rankings over 55 typically don't require bituminous overlays and generally routine maintenance such as crack sealing and seal coat is adequate. As noted on Figure No. 2, all of the PCI Rankings from Highway 13 to Robin Lane (south intersection) are below 40. Also as shown on Figure No. 2, the PCI Rankings from Silver Bell Road to Deerwood Drive are somewhat higher than Silver Bell Road to Highway 13. However, all the rankings fall within the 35-55 category requiring patch/repair and/or overlay. Therefore, based on PCI rankings, various street improvements are required for street reconstruction. 49546.rpt 5 NN> 0 O �� 6'4q- it- , --.-- Y --NN., _/.._..._..._... ©I ...1_ .FSda .._ .c.,,,, , r-° �• � • . ‘74, 6 -....c \ I LAN L.D F.-- -k 1 ,.--,4- ,._ . lor 1 1 .,,, , 11 \ 0 -- ir-- - •N.u, 1 :j E ; . EL._._.R . IL ER BOA ._ i 48 -.1 .tom.. _ r ;.� s» �: j11, � . 0'v, \V PP \ • Elig •‘. 1 ' –1, — #4tbi.-----,--rA/c :-ji:q "tz 1 i ■.--- — .41p,S4S1 I ili `" ; ! tit 401 = voriPirir . : II - . ,...11' CID866 41% = 4 ,�, 4 _ . • 4011 k:-.*.,;,,,, ''' i i ,::::. •1► 'I _ �� �� �.. err• j thin 4 l sw - ( ll = I 11A 1 ti f r - • �irL _BUS nn ....,. mot al . * Milt '!: 'IP Itift*EM111111 — 0 40o eoo ("+� Ti ligAI N is A • • ��� __ Stak in laet -1Th t f i i 1 l N 1 r! Z T. I DRIV I�� PAVEMENT CONDITION INDEX = 48 Bonestroo • Rosene EAGAN, MINNESOTA FIGURE 2 Anderlik & ins Associates BLACKHAWK ROAD CITY PROJECT No. 665 49546R02.DWG NOVEMBER 1993 COMM. 49546 DISCUSSION: Street - Blackhawk Road from Deerwood Drive to Highway 13 was previously constructed in 1969. That construction included a 44 foot wide roadway with concrete curb and gutter from Deerwood Drive to Serpentine Drive and a 24 foot wide roadway with no concrete curb and gutter from Serpentine Drive to Highway 13. Bituminous shoulder with concrete curb and gutter was added to west side of Blackhawk Road from Serpentine Drive to Robin Lane (south intersection) in 1973. The existing sidewalk from Silver Bell Road to 800 feet south was constructed in 1976. The existing typical street section is a 2" thick bituminous surface constructed over a 6 inch aggregate base as shown in Figure No. 3. Blackhawk Road is considered a community collector street in the City of Eagan and funnels traffic to higher density collectors and arterial streets, such as Diffley Road, Cliff Road, and Highway 13. Projected traffic counts (average daily traffic, ADT) for Blackhawk Road (year 2013) based on the Eagan Transportation Study are listed below: Existing Projected 2013 ADT Blackhawk Road 1993 ADT (1.5% Annual Growth Rate) Deerwood Drive to Silver Bell Road 7540 9957 Silver Bell Road to Blue Cross Road 5600 7542 Blue Cross Road to Highway 13 3650 4916 Street construction proposed herein for all of Blackhawk Road is a new 41/2" thick bituminous pavement over a new 10" thick aggregate base as presented on Figure No. 4. Based on forecast traffic volumes, existing conditions, and state aid design standards, it is recommended that a 36 foot wide roadway with new B618 curb be constructed in the section between Silver Bell Road and Highway 13 as shown on Figures No. 5, 6, and 7. This cross section will provide two 18'wide traffic lanes. An 8' wide parking lane could be considered on one side of the roadway. However, by not providing the parking lane, the extra wide driving 49546.rpt 7 lanes (18') will allow turning movements to abutting driveways and side streets, allowing thru traffic to pass without being delayed or significantly encroaching over the center line. Street widening for the most part will occur on the west side of the street, so the east curb line will match the edge of the existing bituminous pavement. The section between Deerwood Drive and Silver Bell Road will remain a 44'wide roadway maintaining the existing concrete curb and gutter as shown on Figure No. 4. The cross section between Deerwood Drive and Silver Bell Road will continue to provide two traffic lanes with a parking/stalled vehicle on both sides of the street. In accordance with the City's Master Trail Plan, an 8' wide bituminous trail with an 8' wide boulevard between the trail and curb will be constructed on the east side of Blackhawk Road between Deerwood Drive and Highway 13. A 6' wide sidewalk will be constructed on the west side between Deerwood Drive and Silver Bell Road maintaining at least an 8' wide boulevard between sidewalk and curb. Existing trees and bushes in the street right-of-way will be saved where possible by slight adjustments in the trail alignment. Figure No. 7 presents the typical roadway and boulevard sections for Blackhawk Road between Deerwood Drive/Silver Bell Road and Silver Bell Road/Highway 13. In addition, to safely and efficiently accommodate increasing traffic volumes in the future, it will be necessary to widen Blackhawk Road on its northbound approach to Robin Lane at Highway 13. The proposed 6' - 8' widening at Robin Lane will permit left turn lanes to both intersections greatly facilitating turning movements and increasing capacity efficiency. It is also proposed to widen Blackhawk Road on its southbound approach to Blue Cross Road. The proposed four foot widening will permit a left turn lane to Blue Cross Road. Signing and pavement markings are necessary to promote proper lane use. 49546.rpt 8 A signal warrant analysis was performed in October of this year at Blackhawk Road and Highway 13 to evaluate the possible need for street signals at that intersection. This included analysis of average traffic delays, average traffic counts, and yearly traffic accidents. The information gathered showed that street signals are not justified at this time. Figure No. 3 - Existing Sections 49546.rpt 9 III 50' 50' . [.. . . 44' . . - 22' 22' Ex. Conc. Curb 1‘.:": c fl J 2" Bituminous Mat 6" Cl. 6 Gravel Base 9" Cl. 3 Gravel Subase Deerwood Drive to Silver Bell Road Original Construction R VARIABLE VARIABLE R 24' - 6' 8' '1�� Z =4 t L Z ��J _II J L. •Bituminous Mat Ex. Conc. Curb 6" Cl. 6 Gravel Base added w/Plat 'Bituminous Shoulder I 9" Cl. 3 Gravel Subase (Added by Maintenance) Silver Bell Road to Blue Cross Road Original Construction IE VARIABLE C. VARIABLE R 1 ins - 24' 8' 8' 8' t - i { s „v 2" Bituminous Mat 6" Cl. 6 Gravel Base Blue Cross Road to T.H. 13 Original Construction EXISTING STREET SECTION il Bonestroo Rosene • Anderlik& EAGAN, MINNESOTA FIGURE 3 Associates BLACKHAWK ROAD Enpineersa Architects CITY PROJECT No. 665 2335 West Highway 36 49546R11.DWG NOVEMBER 1993 COMM. 49546 St. Paul, Minnesota 55113 R. t IL 50' I_ 50' Var. 16' I Va r. 1"' 44 8' i 8' J , 12' 22 22 r Save Existing ill Conc. Curb li i 1 �-- th - -1" Type 41 Bit. Wear Course L4" Conc. Walk —1 1/2" Type 31 Bit. Binder 6" Select Granular 2" Type 31 Bit. Base Course 10" Class 5 Aggregate Base Ex. 2 1/2" Cl. 3 Gravel Base 2" Type 41 Bit. Wear Course 6" C. 5 Aggregate Base Deerwood Drive to Silver Bell Road Street E t ROW E Variable Variable 7' to 11 ' " 36' to 40' - 8' 8' 3' to 7' �' 18'1/4"/Ft. to 20' 18' to 20' — Design Conc. 4' to Curb & Gutter itot6" Crown 1 Type 8'41 Bit.. Wear Course —1 1/2" Type 31 Bit. Binder 2" Type 31 Bit. Base Course 10" Class 5 Aggregate Base Ex. 2 1/2" Cl. 3 Gravel Base 2" Type 41 Bit. Wear Course 6" C. 5 Aggregate Base Silver Bell Road to T.H. 13 PROPOSED STREET SECTION ii g: : °° ne vii Anderlik& EAGAN, MINNESOTA FIGURE 4 Associates BLACKHAWK ROAD Engineers& Architects CITY PROJECT No. 665 2335 West Highway 36 49546R11.DWG NOVEMBER 1993 COMM. 49546 St. Paul. Minnesota 55113 • • o #0 °o Y"a W f..:o cc L am molt cc a_ veva FITr--r T --- U) ��-� 0 0 C 4 , • 1 1 ---- r°- N - m a Q Q A I Q / i, ` ! `�'�! '- Z ------------ Z) �:� Q w.,Fr I `'- - _ 1 = °w ati eEic pla+or ji- , e J.� i i ! .-_Z_ -J r-, i 1 p am t--, t / 1 1 W ! r , /yV 0R ur ' i_(.wI °r 1 0 DU � •+ W i ~. R �� u' ,Y 1 1 s• 3 U 0 co 1 W 1--T L. ..„ � 1 n n 1 �_ I N •3 " ..• AWM t L 1 .�_ cn i o o n, PROVIDE PEDESTRIAN i R 4. 1 -- -t- 1 r • 0 OZ i I -;��8� 1 r Z ,.__J`R - _ �_ m Q Q Q'O n l 1 l I ! U '�^ , 1 I s < 1 J .1 Z 1 1 �_ R ` 1 ® a , Z I I 1 �1Qy� �_3 �.0 _.1 11._'='1--- Q' �' i. 1 1'� 1 3a-_-_, W ci p 1 '0 (ti 1 1 E ``' j ea - c� .: S {__1 w ,i : ,"- -----"f a < , _-_, f '---,-fir^'- ---:•,, �1 1 ' I , --�� 1 BL�II. /ri,//� �� -1, 0 n 1 ! ? 1- n 1c I 1 fA l -1---.1 W II 1 n 1 TR,4! :ti I T - 1 0 1 ----1�, I __.j L t_J ® x n i L.n w 1 I �- --©� 1(n 1 i l L, - 4 -_2` X k M a.' ' p i , W 1 1 Q m r L.....-_J L— I W ce SARTELL yy,trUE- 1 U U -.Rf If / _ __ J I 1 - L 0 - { _�_ Q. i W • f i _ -� 1 _ - -_-.__--- 1 Q 1 1 a "' i I � ' L ^1 am ' o to to aR _ u W ce0 z i f--, • -"--..."'"---, ••• _i I tt _--T— J o 1 C I p O= _.1— I-. 0 m ___ ' a w V 1 # 6 •Q 1 ° T ; # � 1 acs`aczatacaanots><st1 g Pin 4 O 0 6 O I 1 ot1-75 a _ ...... 1 1j --- U p z re LL 3�s)Hatnn m O Z Y 0 3 3 e IN WL 8c, i m o d 4 C ..• • e 11 • U •--i '' b.r— e b._L.0 l' \ 1 ' t le I gym^ Cr., m 0 - ;- i . 1 0 to n 4 0 1 W . „0; cc n 0 ;n *; +T N1. ': i-- 1 , gg a hg8S1^iL -3 o 1 ` t IX . I /` I . can —� 1 _ - )a 1 ,®Y O STOP{ I`,.,, a � ) % , 1 O lc-� � i f N 6 . a Q 1 m o ■ x0 N� __I f" ^ I 0 . 0 I--• I t 1 1 •d o w. I � -* . U TT _ i 1 s,_.1-1 Pd-•4--1 W n o et a. r-TiC-� In H� N N 4 SW= •_._. Rao p Z M It)co a .--• ---�.. o co z° g o l 1 s W 8 g 3 n v Lt 1 a. T X 1 aW + t a h W Z a I F-lf� W E U i1 l r- - _ .c� ! 5 O s Tr 0 0 10 a. N a F 5 • °a ci ---- r----- L r-« 1 U U ji 7 t.° t 44' 1 1 ix�'�C� _` I I I i---tom-1 I I • O kJ • O Y o 7C a Clp q O O O C W CO Q Q Q oo •. \ 9- 1 \ .... (.7 4:IP I :.••■� A 1 N h - cc(L• Q W•ate.. % • �.e; m G� m o wD ❑ W® E 4 O ` �' a U z • \28 a_ w N W a aM 10 wa• V wvE I E T 5 QQ _0, rii --7 eiwl io E z Q re U o O • • a p El w 0 aii piss a m - /�A O 5 co rt ; - \ r gym► d U C1t � r1 i�'_ rAUOLANE l °. �$$ / o P.Igg • to •.,pi, • a El co iiik • o l z c° 7 I' MI rd v �' o a } 5 U ,, i F___. N iss (...) ..... m ii ' Lai z 6 • . i A o - / ' 1 ).. g --.):zos • "--,....._1(r u -c -0 \ \ ,'I f d� 2 • 8 �' � N. a► t5 f' 2t C,, 4.44 o. o , \ c, v Z \ '. \ . v `', , t \ ao 9 m \ Z ` aD C 1-, ) : t 1 I ri" ° 't, N 41 I r t s , 6 I o '....: z \‘', (1' f •\.` , • . e • bms 6 23'D , am . 1 I r.aPK / ' se.stom f.;1 § v 4110•tn A Y —i Z • C %••°.‘0.•b A • ap / o N'� t'(-;''...°''';' • • gat A 1)~m Z--- DMI QI e ti N.amZ =.a * a$ 0 � * F 8 . a Fell vs" e * 9• 8 co n Storm Sewer - The existing storm sewer systems serving Blackhawk Road were reviewed to determine their present capacity. It's proposed to reconstruct either wholly or partially all the existing catch basin structures and catch basin leads on Blackhawk Road. Presented on Figures No. 8, 9, and 10 are new storm sewer extensions proposed from the existing storm sewer systems. The storm sewer extensions are recommended to improve intersection drainage and provide greater inlet capacity into the existing storm sewer system. The existing storm sewers conveying drainage from Blackhawk Road at Deerwood Drive;between Davenport Avenue and Cochrane Avenue into Cedar Grove No. 6; Robin Lane opposite Blackhawk Lake; and Crestridge Lane are proposed to be utilized as part of this project. Although the capacity of these existing storm sewers are slightly less than the required 5 year storm event, based on past history and the condition of each storm sewer, it's not recommended any upgrades be made at this time. 49546.rpt 16 x U► t F____. ■ g 1Ni g . , g N`J v Y Is j B i o m ,. 1 ° 41h1' li n J u i ti , I' • z d Z o so U co cn o 4 if C,' i 1 . Awn onW/LA \ • 1 AMA o c ■ a 1 r m , D 1u1y f' ,.. \ e o 91 OX O 41 1 �g r17-1 m i 1 z r 1 m z m� A 1 awn err, - m 1 V Cal 1 I N1 t •• n1 0 e 8 0 5 , c 1 m a • ._. 1)96 ° . rcoil ►Z y- O rn a 00x 0 glt gun 4. m m O isa z ■ 0 to 8 ; 8a �. � O z � � a ,ro �nm N� oP O 2° 2 mn n m � � `� rl �� \ •-i ■ r, g xi rn °- a }rit31„..T, . .. . , N o .-11. v-) : • I6 i . • b V 4 -u c f . ! ..., e3 1 Miii_- i m o 1 _.))t t--• 4a .-I [ 1 L , L a I 2 g 4 4 t ? l x_ 01 1 O t t p `s, \I-1 I %I .t. i.._. t. 6 4 _. 4 1 IN .1 1_ilig. �- ® -----_____r i `L+ � p 1 O r i A t .__ O r .___ / q-.ri-r_ le: . . t s y r._ww... . _...A 1....t\ t 7� � 3N MOW z ° L__..1 ` ol i r C m o -13 0 m 23 1 N 1,1 rr u ....4 t —f' 0 o ro _.1T-rit ox tie u)4 • p . x M � � • r - I* PI Ui -�t t r 0 4 , �►/fJh O rl �-, n g as 0 0 1 i g g mo X Z 0 Nmm _ _ M ICH LIIE Z v �- y SL-ll0 I y 0 D ''0 •� '•-• tl 9C 3 -- 9f�x3 A G D A W • /A —1 O 11 a ..t y 3NNQ 00 aM21330 7:1 m 1. t5i• 1 I 62- I] 16/ .fa. rn?' t.. I 1 T ...?; ri —1,F.,,, 2 F"'-' h.. m 1 A 4 t3 4..... .', t.2 K m m Z b-- 1 'T C5 eJ m N Z I • -. 0 ► + Jam'-, 7 - Meer 0133 ex 0D 1 _-1 J _. __ u a • 1 0 il ,__.. j —1.72.3.- - ._.. ° Y- _ 0 L—J 1 3l1N�1 7731NVS torn r- 1 Q �; , It • Ti ;fl GI V A:I et s-[ ; 11 U r1 "/ 11 ',. L. .. —V es .7-L 1 1 LE;j---i 11 ,/1I/��pP��� ,...infeiTaimpow 111:11 1.---r_ v J Q (nom 1� r� ��.--r 1 - ii�..;f1. `i . m NV 11 ' 11 V�__ 1 V n � N I1 �j CI �� F. i1T_ 43 ► x�67e f _'L o X '� O • 1 a a __ N i. IN iii. 1 --_] L..„- ..-1-1_, i_ .i 1 I / ii --' c - = - _ l 11 ;; rkr y ... r w a L_ 11! Y CI.o. 11 I T . -rm.` -- U • -•~ y_,1.� 5.7 ft- 1 • 'O . -_---J 11 • ` 1-1 �� ii �7 = a L_ _ I J z 23 m 1- l • 11 :__ 40 g ii ��11 It E .O...1J1 C O •L: eta ==tN ==# .. ,mom-- - 1 {/-71" o —1 Ll . . _...-Cb 1 a o Q ►--J 1 j„.......,,...,......... _ aki al •3 C Li O hq f • N X z / / Z W ` �/ n 0 0 Z 4 ` \ o • U M 0 C; 1` o Q m • v M 0 • M \1 . r En xi to - 0 �> N O . o 1 N 1, 0 4, o V•s\`1 r i 8 . sy./ . - : N / • .0 / • f// I/. ' / / V / r q , Y 11 • ' D ` F \ t o - r ,e' t� \AN. m700 n C `.b. maw = x a ow * s c 0 o A ° rl Sanitary Sewer and Water Service Reconstruction - Utility reconstruction includes minor improvements to the existing sanitary sewer and water system. These improvements include the removal of all 24" diameter sanitary sewer castings and replacing the new 27" diameter casting. The existing 27" diameter covers with pick holes will also be replaced with new 27" diameter covers with concealed pick holes. Through the televising of the sanitary sewer lines on Blackhawk Road, two sanitary lines were discovered to be in need of repair. It is proposed that portions of these pipe be excavated and repaired as needed. All existing gate valves will be adjusted to grade. In addition, a few of the existing water shutoff valves serving each home are not properly working. Therefore, it is proposed to repair all existing water shutoff valves which aren't working. It's also proposed to install two new gate valves in the existing water main system, one at Silver Bell Road and another at Robin Lane (north intersection). Street Lights: It's proposed to have Dakota Electric construct 14 street lights along Blackhawk Road. 49546.rpt 21 EASEMENTS/PERMITS: To construct the bituminous pathway between Silver Bell Road and Highway 13 and maintain an 8' wide boulevard, a small permanent easement (approximately 1200 sq. ft.) is required from Parcel 011-75 at Kyllo Lane. Temporary easements will be required at various locations to maintain the 8' wide boulevard and bituminous pathway. The extent of temporary easements could be minimized in some cases with retaining wall construction. Listed below are the parcels where temporary easements may be required: Silver Bell Road to Highway 26 Parcel 010-76 Parcel 090-75 Parcel 010-81 Parcel 070-75 Parcel 011-75 Parcel 010-79 A permit will be required to work within MnDOT right-of-way at Highway 13. 49546.rpt 22 COST ESTIMATE: A preliminary cost estimate is presented in Appendix A located at the back of this report which is summarized below: I. STREET A. Blackhawk Road (Deerwood Drive to Silver Bell Road) a) Bituminous Street Reconstruction $310,820 b) Repair Existing Concrete Curb 36,730 B. Blackhawk Road (Silver Bell Road to Highway 13) a) Bituminous Street Reconstruction $460,380 b) Concrete Curb Improvements 75,760 II. CONCRETE SIDEWALK (Deerwood Drive to Silver Bell Road) $52,420 III. BITUMINOUS PATHWAY a. Blackhawk Road (Deerwood Drive to Silver Bell Road) $ 47,770 b. Blackhawk Road (Silver Bell Road to Highway 13) 99,850 IV. STORM SEWER a. Blackhawk Road (Deerwood Drive to Silver Bell Road) $113,300 b. Blackhawk Road (Silver Bell Road to Highway 13) 168,170 V. SANITARY SEWER AND WATER REPAIR a. Blackhawk Road (Deerwood Drive to Silver Bell Road) $ 17,170 b. Blackhawk Road (Silver Bell Road to Highway 13) 29,550 VI. STREET LIGHTS $ 20,160 TOTAL $1,432,080 The total estimated project cost is$1,432,080 which includes contingencies and indirect costs. Contingency costs are estimated at 5% while indirect costs are estimated at 30% which include legal, engineering, administration, and bond interest. Indirect costs for street lights are estimated at 20%. 49546.rpt 23 • AREA TO BE INCLUDED: (BLACKHAWK ROAD - PROJECT NO. 665): DEERWOOD DRIVE to SILVER BELL ROAD ASSESSMENT AREA CONSTRUCTION AREA NE 1/4 Section 20 Cedar Grove No. 6 Parcel 010-03 Lot 1 Block 5 Lot 1, 2, 53 Block 6 Cedar Grove No. 6 Lot 1, 18 Block 8 Lots 54-61 Block 6 Lot 1 Block 9 Blackhawk Oaks Addition Cedar Grove No. 8 Lot l Block 1 Lot 1, 9 Block 7 Lot 5, 6, 11, 12 Block 9 Lot 12, 13 Block 10 Cedar Grove No. 10 Lot 4, 5, 12 Block 1 Cedar Grove No. 11 Lot 1, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11 Block 1 Blackhawk Oaks Addition Lot 2 Block 1 Lot 1 Block 2 SILVER BELL ROAD to T.H.NO. 13 ASSESSMENT AREA CONSTRUCTION AREA SE 1/4 Section 17 Parcel 010-76 Ridge View Acres Parcel 010-77 Lot 9 Block 2 Parcel 010-78 Lot 8, 9 Block 3 Parcel 010-79 Lot 7, 8 Block 4 Parcel 010-81 Parcel 011-02 Parcel 011-75 Parcel 012-01 (Sky Hill Park) Parcel 012-02 Parcel 020-78 Parcel 030-75 Parcel 030-78 Parcel 040-75 Parcel 050-75 Parcel 060-75 Parcel 070-75 Parcel 090-75 Town View First Addition Lot 1 Block 21 Blackhawk Acres Lot 1-5 Lot 6 (061-00) Blue Cross Addition Lot 3 Block 1 49546.rpt 24 ASSESSMENT: Assessments are proposed to be levied against the benefitted property which take direct driveway access onto Blackhawk Road in accordance with the City of Eagan's Assessment Policy for Street Reconstruction which is summarized below. A preliminary assessment roll is included in Appendix B located at the back of this report. All costs will be revised based on final project costs. Property Type Residential/Duplex All Other Assessed City Assessed Bituminous Street Reconstruction 75% 25% 100% 0% New Concrete Curb 100% 0% 100% 0% Repair Existing Concrete Curb 0% 100% 0% 100% Storm Sewer 0% 100% 0% 100% Sanitary Sewer/Water Repair 0% 100% 0% 100% New Sanitary Sewer/Water Service 100% 0% 100% 0% Similar to other street reconstruction projects in the City of Eagan and the Cedar Grove area, it's proposed to assess residential property which take direct driveway access on a lot equivalent basis, one lot equivalent for each standard residential lot. In the event an unplatted residential property can subdivide further based on Eagan's required lot size, street frontage, and available open space, it's proposed to assess that property the number of lot equivalents that it can subdivide too. Listed below are the existing residential properties along Blackhawk Road that can subdivide further which are also listed in Appendix B and shown on Figure No. 13 located at the back of this report. Parcel Estimated Lot Equivalents SE 1/4 Section 17 Parcel 010-76 5 Parcel 010-78 2 Parcel 011-02 3 Parcel 011-75 2 Parcel 030-78 2 Parcel 070-75 2 49546.rpt 25 The cost per lot equivalent for bituminous street reconstruction and new concrete curb are presented in Appendix C and are listed below. The cost per lot equivalent is based on reconstructing a standard 32' wide residential street to a residential design thickness between Silver Bell Road and Highway 13 as presented in Appendix C. It's proposed to assess the same bituminous street reconstruction rate per lot equivalent to the assessable residential property between Deerwood Drive and Silver Bell Road as shown on Figure No. 14 located at the back of this report. It's not proposed to assess the new concrete rate to the properties between Deerwood Drive and Silver Bell Road because concrete curb already exists. Cost/Lot Equivalent Bituminous New Concrete Blackhawk Road Street Reconstruction Curb Total Deerwood Drive to Silver Bell Road $2073 N/A $2073 Silver Bell Road to Highway 13 $2073 $1914 $3987 Properties which aren't residential (commercial or multiple) are proposed to be assessed on a front foot basis. The front foot rate is determined by dividing the bituminous street reconstruction cost ($460,380) and new concrete curb cost ($75,760) for Blackhawk Road between Silver Bell Road and Highway 13 by the total front footage (8,000 F.F.) as presented in Appendix B. Town View 1st Addition constructed concrete curb when it developed, therefore, it is proposed to provide a curb credit in determining the front foot rate for Town View 1st Addition. The rate per front foot with and without a curb credit is presented below: Silver Bell Road to Highway 13 Rate/F.F. Commercial/Multiple Property $67.02 Town View 1st Addition (Curb Credit) $52.94 49546.rpt 26 Project costs associated with concrete sidewalk, bituminous trail, new storm sewer, and sanitary sewer/water main repairs are not proposed to be assessed. However, sanitary sewer and water main extensions to serve future subdivisions or development will be assessed to the abutting property they serve. The property owner will have the option at the time of the assessment hearing to pay the assessment in full following the assessment hearing or include the assessment as part of their property tax statement. If the assessment is included on the property tax statement, the assessment will be spread over a period of time and at an interest rate determined by the bond sale financing this improvement. If the assessment is spread over a 15 year period at a 7% interest rate, the following payment schedule will result based on the following assessment amounts: Assessment = $3,987 Principal Interest Cost Per Cost Per Per Year Per Year Year Month 1st Year $266 $279 $545 $45 15th Year 266 19 285 24 Assessment = $2,073 1st Year $138 $145 $283 $24 15th Year 138 10 148 12 49546.rpt 27 REVENUE: A summary of revenue sources is listed below: Project I) STREET Cost Revenue Balance A. Deerwood Drive to Silver Bell Road 1. Bituminous Street Reconstruction $310,820 20,730 -290,090 2. Repair Existing Concrete Curb 36,730 0 -36,730 B. Silver Bell Road to TH 13 1. Bituminous Street Reconstruction 460,380 2. New Concrete Curb 75,760 Subtotal (Part B) 536,140 289,837 -246,303 II) CONCRETE SIDEWALK A. Deerwood Drive to Silver Bell Road 52,420 - 52,420 III) BITUMINOUS PATHWAY A. Deerwood'Drive to Silver Bell Road 47,770 - 47,770 B. Silver Bell Road to TH 13 99,850 - 99,850 IV) STORM SEWER A. Deerwood Drive to Silver Bell Road 113,300 - 113,300 B. Silver Bell Road to TH 13 168,170 - 168,170 V) SANITARY SEWER/WATER MAIN REPAIRS A. Deerwood Drive to Silver Bell Road 17,170 - 17,170 B. Silver Bell Road to TH 13 29,550 - 29,550 TOTAL $1,432,080 $310,567 $1,121,513 The anticipated project deficit is $1,121,513 which will be the responsibility of the major street fund and respective utility funds. 49546.rpt 28 PROJECT SCHEDULE Present Feasibility Report January, 1994 Public Hearing February, 1994 Approve Plans & Specifications Winter 1994 Award Contract Spring 1994 Substantial Completion Fall 1994 Assessment Hearing Fall 1994 First Payment Due w/Property Tax Statement Spring 1995 49546.rpt 29 • • Appendix A Preliminary Cost Estimate Blackhawk Road Street and Utility Reconstruction Project 645 I. Street A. Blackhawk Road (Deerwood Drive to Silver Bell Road) a) Bituminous Street Reconstruction 15,000 SY Remove bituminous pavement @ $1.50/sq.yd. $ 22,500 750 CY Subgrade excavation @ $5.00/cu.yd. 3,750 1,000 CY Select backfill @ $4.0 0/cu.yd. 4,000 9,000 TN Class 5 aggregate base @ $8.00/ton 72,000 1,700 TN Bituminous base course @ $21.00/ton 35,700 1,300 TN Bituminous binder course @ $21.00/ton 27,300 900 TN Bituminous wear course @ $23.00/ton 20,700 800 GL Bituminous material for tack coat @ $1.50/gal. 1,200 135 SY Concrete valley gutter @ $30.00/sq.yd. 4,050 1 LS Traffic control @ $25,000.00/lump sum 25,000 4 EA Remove/reconstruct existing CBMH/CB w/cstg @ $1,400.00/ea 5,600 5 EA Adjust CBMH/CB/MH precast structure w/cstg @ $700.00/ea 3,500 2 EA Remove and replace MH rings and cstg. @ $300.00/ea 600 50 LF 15" RCP storm sewer @ $24.00/lin.ft. 1,200 3 EA Adjust GV & box @ $200.00/ea 600 Subtotal $227,700 + 5% Contingencies 11,390 $239,090 + 30% indirect Cost 71,730 TOTAL BITUMINOUS STREET IMPROVEMENTS $310,820 b) Repair Existing Concrete Curb 1,750 LF Remove concrete curb & gutter @ $4.00/lin.ft. $ 7,000 1,750 LF Concrete curb & gutter @ $10.00/lin.ft. 17,500 800 SY Sod w/topsoil @ $3.00/sq.yd. 2,400 Subtotal $26,900 + 5% Contingencies 1,350 $28,250 + 30% Indirect Costs 8,480 TOTAL REPAIR CONCRETE CURB $36,730 49546.appendix.a B. Blackhawk Road (Silver Bell Road to Highway 13) a) Bituminous Street Reconstruction 16,000 SY Remove bituminous pavement @ $1.50/sq.yd. $24,000 7,500 CY Common excavation @ $7.00/cu.yd. 52,500 1,500 CY Subgrade excavation @ $5.00/cu.yd. 7,500 1,500 CY Select backfill @ $4.0 0/cu.yd. 6,000 10,500 TN Class 5 aggregate @ $8.00/ton 84,000 2,200 TN Bituminous base curse $ @21.00/ton 46,200 1,600 TN Bituminous binder coarse @ $21.00/ton 33,600 1,100 TN Bituminous wear course @ $23.00/ton 25,300 850 GL Bituminous material for tack coat @ $1.50/gal 1,280 270 SY Concrete valley gutter @ $30.00/sq.yd. 8,100 1 LS Traffic control @ $25,000.00/lump sum 25,000 12 EA Remove/reconstruct CBMH/CB w/casting @ $1,400.00/ea 16,800 3 EA Adjust CBMH/CB/MH precast structure w/cstg @ $700.00/ea 2,100 3 EA Remove and replace MH rings & casting @ $300.0 0/ea 900 50 LF 15" RCP storm sewer @ $24.00/1in.ft. _ 1,200 4 EA Adjust GV & Box @ $200.00/ea 800 50 EA Clear &grub @ $300.00/ea 1,500 10 EA Relocate mailboxes @ $50.0 0/ea 500 Subtotal $337,280 + 5% Contingencies 16,860 $354,140 + 30% Indirect Costs 106,240 TOTAL BITUMINOUS STREET IMPROVEMENTS $460,380 b) New Concrete Curb Improvements 1,450 LF Remove concrete curb @ $4.00/lin.ft. $ 5,800 8,500 LF B618 concrete curb & gutter @ $5.00/lin.ft. 42,500 18 EA Driveway restoration @ $400.00/ea 7,200 Subtotal $55,500 + 5% Contingencies 2.780 $58,280 + 30% Indirect Costs 17,480 TOTAL NEW CONCRETE CURB IMPROVEMENTS $75,760 49546.appendix.a , i . II. Concrete Sidewalk a) Blackhawk Road (Deerwood Drive to Silver Bell Road) 7,700 SY 4" concrete sidewalk @ $1.50/sq.yd. $11,550 300 CY Common excavation @ $7.00/cu.yd. 2,100 200 CY Select granular borrow @ $8.00/cu.yd. 1,600 7 EA Driveway repair @ $400.00/ea. 2,800 4,000 SY Sod w/topsoil @ $3.00/sq.yd 12,000 17 EA Clear & grub @ $300.00/sq.yd.. 5,100 3,250 SF Remove ex. 4" sidewalk @ $1.00/sq.ft. 3.250 Subtotal $38,400 + 5% Contingencies 1,920 $40,320 + 30% Indirect Costs 12,100 TOTAL CONCRETE SIDEWALK $52,420 III. Bituminous Pathway a) Blackhawk Road (Deerwood Drive to Silver Bell Road) 2,300 SY 2" Bituminous pathway @ $3.00/sq.yd. $ 6,900 600 CY Common excavation @ $7.00/cu.yd. 4,200 800 TN Class 5 aggregate @ $8.00/ton 6,400 1 EA Driveway repair @ $400.00/ea. 400 4,500 SY Sod w/topsoil @ $3.00/sq.yd. 13,500 12 EA Clear & grub @ $300.00/ea 3,600 Subtotal $35,000 + 5% Contingencies 1,750 $36,750 + 30% Indirect Costs 11,020 TOTAL PATHWAY (Deerwood Drive to Silver Bell Road) $47,770 49546.appendix.a i . b) Blackhawk Road (Silver Bell Road to Highway 13) 2,600 SY 2" Bituminous pathway @ $3.00/sq.yd $ 7,800 650 CY Common excavation @ $7.00/cu.yd. 4,550 1,000 TN Class 5 aggregate @ $8.00/ton 8,000 7 EA Driveway repair @ $400.0 0/ea. 2,800 4,500 SY Sod w/topsoil @ $3.00/sq.yd. 13,500 2,100 SF Retaining wall @ $15.00/sq.ft. 31,500 30 EA Clear & grub @ $150.00/ea. 4,500 20 CY Landscape rock @ $25.00/cu.yd. 500 Subtotal $73,150 + 5% Contingencies 3,660 $76,810 + 30% Indirect Costs 23,040 TOTAL PATHWAY (Silver Bell Road to Highway 13) $99,850 IV. Storm Sewer a) Blackhawk Road (Deerwood Drive to Silver Bell Road) 150 LF Remove existing storm sewer @ $8.00/lin.ft. $ 1,200 1,550 LF 15" RCP storm sewer @ $26.00/lin.ft. 40,300 27 EA Std. MH/CB w/cstg. @ $1,500.00/ea 40,500 2 EA Connect to Ex. MH @ $500.0 0/ea 1,000 Subtotal $83,000 + 5% Contingencies 4,150 $87,150 + 30% Indirect Costs 26,150 TOTAL STORM SEWER (Deerwood Drive to Silver Bell Road) $113,300 b) Blackhawk Road (Silver Bell Road to Highway 13) 400 LF Remove existing storm sewer @ $8.00/lin.ft. $ 3,200 2,500 LF 15" RCP storm sewer @ $26.00/lin.ft. 65,000 36 EA Std. MH/CB w/cstg. @ $1,500.00/ea 54,000 2 EA Connect to Ex. MH @ $500.00/ea 1,000 Subtotal $123,200 + 5% Contingencies 6,160 $129,360 + 30% Indirect Costs 38,810 TOTAL STORM SEWER (Silver Bell Road.to Highway 13) $168,170 49546.appendix.a J' V. Sanitary Sewer and Water Repairs a) Blackhawk Road (Deerwood Drive to Silver Bell Road) 2 EA Adjust MH precast section @ $650.0 0/ea. $ 1,300 3 EA Salvage existing casting @ $60.00/ea 180 3 EA Remove and replace rings and casting @ $300.00/ea 900 1 EA Furnish and install GV & box @ $1,000.00/ea 1,000 1 EA Furnish and install curb stop & box @ $350.0 0/ea 350 50 LF 1" Copper water service @ $17.00/lin.ft. 850 2 EA Repair sanitary sewer lines @ $4,000.00/ea. 8,000 Subtotal $12,580 + 5% Contingencies 630 $13,210 + 30% Indirect Costs 3,960 TOTAL SANITARY SEWER (Deerwood Drive to Silver Bell Road) $17,170 b) Blackhawk Road (Silver Bell Road to Highway 13) 5 EA Adjust MH precast section @ $650.00/ea. $ 3,250 15 EA Salvage existing casting @ $60.00/ea 900 15 EA Remove and replace rings and casting @ $300.00/ea 4,500 1 EA Furnish and install GV & box @ $1,000.00/ea 1,000 3 EA Repair sanitary sewer lines @ $4,000.00/ea. 12,000 Subtotal $21,650 + 5% Contingencies 1,080 $22,730 + 30% Indirect Costs 6.820 TOTAL SANITARY SEWER (Silver Bell Road to Highway 13) $29,550 VI. Street Lights 14 EA Street lights @ $1,200.00/ea $16,800 16,800 + 20% Indirect Costs $ 3,360 TOTAL STREET LIGHTS $20,160 49546.appendix.a 1 • , y M d M Ina' ' o0N -Idt, t, t- t"d• t- t, N N N MN M b . d N 00 N M V1 ts N 00 NO t� 00 00 00 00 N CO 00 00 N 00 a E O q Ow.-4 O; (1 O1 O'01 Ow Ow 01 01 01 0 O; O; 01 01 o0 al a. O in to ~S. Qr N N .�-4en et. .-i MMMt� MMMrM t� - M O .. T FF�??? 0 6 h a . 1 00 'O 0 'O O 0 0 .. gr; en 1 .. = r` qq a 0 d C a 44 N V TA w z 2, 8 W E , Fl O V1 O O 06 IS z `" • a 5 a - �,' a tt et _4 d -F � -4 �t et ,-l -4 4 • v7 � et d• V' O O% OA OA ON ON ON O. ON ON ON ON ON ON O' O. O' O' JD WI V . . . • .-1 I .-1 ri .-1 4 .-1 .-1 4 .-I .-4 .-I .-I .-4 .-4 .M • = Q . ° 4 W a. � r i E.R. ., C ila' 61 1,1 1*A CA O v P ` g .. M M M M M M M M M M 4 M M M M M M M M M O Lir C� ai N N N O O 0000000000000 00 i'^i44 N N • N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Q p04 o ai Q y � �► Q .t-' Z" 8 5 3 3 > mop oo V Z W .-4 00 V1 . N • .-I M N -I •-1 .■4 N ■■4 .-4 .� N .•I $ Y1 -4 et �W � W4.. , , oo X ao ., CI Cr).. 4 �. � gfE„ U 4. ^ g a. z II 2 w �, • o y O „a ' I.• c 8 m q Z 0 I. no m 5 NON000' .-4N V1tiN00In00 In in V1 V1 V1 � � 0 a .� 65 a ... o NNNN 000N00NNNNNNNN qrj 11 II .y� �p F ” W "" q 0 ., 0000000000000000 4N U F qr, x 2ww Pi $ d a. o �0.t Z , W Q ." �, T c O 0 g o Pq ,�, 8 Dal rnUCS: w d a O)) a4 (� ••' S .-i r i 'O a t4 N M d W 3 .y •. q w to � .a �, v 0 q g to � a � v � � � v ua .. 1 I APPENDIX C RESIDENTIAL EQUIVALENT STREET ASSESSMENT BLACKHAWK ROAD STREET AND UTILITY RECONSTRUCTION Project No. 665 File 49546 Blackhawk Road (Silver Bell Road to Highway 13) Equivalent 32' wide street I. Bituminous Street Reconstruction 16,000 SY Remove bituminous pavement @ $1.50/sq.yd. $ 24,000 1,200 CY Common excavation @ $7.00/cu.yd. 8,400 2,500 TN Class 5 aggregate @ $8.00/ton 20,000 1,600 TN Bituminous base course @ $21.00/ton 33,600 800 TN Bituminous wear course @ $23.00/ton 18,400 750 GL Bituminous material for tack coat @ $1.50/gal. 1,130 1 LS Traffic control @ $20,000/lump sum 3,000 5 EA Remove/reconstruct CBMH/CB w/cstg @ $1,400.00/ea. 7,000 100 LF 15" RCP storm sewer @ $24.00/lin.ft. 2,400 6 EA Adjust GV & box @ $200.00/ea 1,200 Subtotal $119,130 + 10% Contingencies 5,960 $125,090 + 35% Indirect Costs 37,530 TOTAL BITUMINOUS STREET $162,620 II. New Concrete Curb 1,450 LF Remove concrete curb @ $4.00/lin.ft. $ 5,800 8,500 LF Concrete curb & gutter @ $5.00/lin.ft. 42,500 18 EA Driveway repair @ $400.00/ea. 7,200 9,000 SY Sod w/topsoil @ $3.00/sq.yd. 27,000 Subtotal $82,500 + 5% Contingencies 4,120 $86,620 + 35% Indirect Costs 25,990 TOTAL CONCRETE CURB $112,610 49546/appendix.c • • . • • III. Residential Cost/Lot Equivalent • - Street Length Highway 13 to Silver Bell Road Highway 13 = Station 97+05 Silver Bell Road = Station 5705 Total Lineal Feet = 4000 L.F. Total Front Feet = 8000 F.F - Non Assessable and Non Residential F.F. Property Highway 13 R/W 175 F.F. Robin Lane R/W (N & S) 120 F.F. Parcel 010-77 (Comm.) 450 F.F. Lot 3 Block 1 Blue Cross (Comm.) 740 F.F. Blue Cross Road R/W 60 F.F. Parcel 010-79 (Multiple) 645 F.F. Ridge View Acres (Non Assessable) 1105 F.F. Town View 1st Addition (Lot 1 Blk 1) 450 F.F. Silver Bell Road 40 F.F. 3,785 F.F. - Residential Equivalent Street Reconstruction Cost = (8,000-3,785)F.F.x$162,620 x 0.75 = $64,260 8,000 F.F. Cost/Lot Equivalent = $64,260/31 Lot Equivalent = $2,073/Lot Equivalent - Residential Equivalent New Curb Cost = 4215 F.F. x $112,610 = $59,330 8,000 F.F. Cost/Lot Equivalent = $59,330 = $1,914/Lot Equivalent 31 Lot Equivalent - New Curb Rate/F.F. = $112,610 = $14.08/F.F. 8,000 F.F. 49546/appendix.c . . • � 0 P 3 .• 0 250 500 Stale in feet 1030' '%% A'''. .. CITY OF EAGAN ~rte N '' RK `?'"'"''450' ti §<v 131E 1LE Sr'$KY t4ILL P 010-77 0 01 1-02 2LE p'\p/ CRE T RI GE LA 1LE 020-78 m RIOGE VIE`' ACF ES 030-78 , . 2LE MO■7ERY LA z A LEGEND 0 2LE —NUMBER LOT EQUIVALENTS LE 010-79 ti KYLLO LA 6451 FRONT FOOT ASSESSMENT _ (NON RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY) <9. 12LE 5 `'tr 1LE 1 - DRIVEWAY ACCESS ` 030-75 -- 1LE 010-80 030-80 t- 1 r1C 1LE-....2 040-75 1LE 020-80 Z''`'1LE l� 050-75••—1LE EMI 060-75 �' m LE z 1 1LE 1 LE tut" 061=00 2LE b. 070-75 010-81 1LE "." --090-75 1LE it op r ® o i 010-76 4> 1 2 5LE SILVER BELL ROAD III ) II ) 111H ASSESSMENTS n Bonestroo , • . Rosene EAGAN, MINNESOTA FIGURE 13 Anderlik d BLACKHAWK ROAD Associates CITY PROJECT No. 665 49546R12.DWG DECEMBER 1993 COMM. 49546 . • r N 0 250 500 SILVER BELL ROAD Scene in feet cum mss, P PA I II =" 4•400r.`Aamw* ii mi 2.14 ' ,--4, % 4= vgir 14 mil vs., 1ii 4` • III ii1IIa - L 'D 0 `40i w ip, ■ 1111■ ■n -- u i1 /■ a vCC -. . . 1 = allir011/ 101/V ,.„1„. 6 /11. . skOravitan 7#1'm r,Foo° . � V 0 HRA NE AVE. ■1■■■■1 A► Ilp m / 1111111110 # ... A 06 16 Illr-o§' ma 011 _ ...*, :LAC wly K R wall := _:A■ - •• . ■ LL A E. ■■■ SIR 0 -AI am, • i V 1-1E -1 na • illippr I DEERW000 DR LEGEND sxt, 1 LOT EQUIVALENT EACH ./ DRIVEWAY ACCESS ASSESSMENTS EA Bones troo Rosene EAGAN, MINNESOTA FIGURE 14 Anderlik 6 Associates BLACKHAWK ROAD CITY PROJECT No. 665 49546R12.DWG NOVEMBER 1993 COMM. 49546