Loading...
09/21/1993 - City Council Regular AGENDA REGULAR MEETING ' EAGAN CITY COUNCIL EAGAN, MINNESOTA MUNICIPAL CENTER BUILDING SEPTEMBER 21, 1993 6:30 P.M. I. 6:30 - ROLL CALL & PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE (BLUE) II. 6:35 - ADOPT AGENDA & APPROVAL OF MINUTES (BLUE) III. 6:40 - RECOGNITION - FIREFIGHTER ED ENGELHARD IV. 6: 45 - DEPARTMENT HEAD BUSINESS (BLUE) A. POLICE DEPARTMENT P, k 1. Request to Change Ordinance to Permit Indoor Splatball V. 6:55 - CONSENT AGENDA (PINK) 0. .3 A. PERSONNEL ITEMS L B. PROCLAMATION, Adult Literacy Week, September 27 - October 3 - IOC. PROCLAMATION, Waste Reduction Week, September 27 - October 2 .L3 D. APPLICATION, Dakota County Community Landfill Abatement Funding 4 E. LICENSE, Liquor, Change Managers for Holiday Inn, 2700 Pilot Knob Road f' .„, F. CONTRACT 92-09, Acknowledge Completion, Final Payment and City Maintenance (Great Oaks P Addition - Streets & Utilities) a,1 G. VACATE Public Utility Easement (Town Centre 70 - 2nd & 11th Additions) .2q H. FINAL PLAT, Lakeview Trails 2nd Addition T-- .29► I . FINAL PLAT, Autumn Ridge 4th Addition 234 FINAL PLAT, Town Centre 70 - 15th Addition tJ( . AUTHORIZE Appointment of New Hearing Examiner, Tobacco License for Suspension � , L. AUTHORIZE Correspondence, Dakota County Long-Term, Solid Waste Funding Program Py.r M. TRANSFER of Automobile, Drug Task Force to Police Department P' Y N. RATIFY Amendment to Planned Development Agreement, Pondview Addition P 0. PROJECT 639 , Receive Final Assessment Roll/Schedule Public Hearing (Aldrin Drive - PStreets & Utilities) j3 P. PROJECT 609, Receive Final Assessment Roll/Schedule Public Hearing (Cliff Road & Rahn P Cliff Road - Streets & Utilities) 53. PROJECT 641, Receive Final Assessment Roll/Schedule Public Hearing (Wenzel Addition - Streets & Utilities) 5:1( R. CONTRACT 93-C, Acknowledge Completion/Authorize City Maintenance (Park Center 3rd tr. Addition - Storm Sewer) S t� S. VACATE Public Right-of-Way, Receive Petition/Schedule Public Hearing (Birch Street & V. Trails End Road VI. 7 :00 - PUBLIC HEARINGS (SALMON) P. 6-5: A. FINAL Assessment Hearing, Delinquent Utility Bills (pp B. FINAL Assessment Hearing, Project 627, Oak Cliff 6th Addition - Streets & Utilities 1- c2 cf C. FINAL Assessment. Hearing, Project 631, Lone Oak Road & Eagandale Boulevard - Street P' & Signals 9 D. VACATE Public Right-of-Way, Carol Street (S1/2 of Sec 36) (' VII. OLD BUSINESS (ORCHID) P �1t,f A. EXTENSION, Preliminary Plat, Wilson Addition, Located along the west aide of Blackhawk l ( 1 Road in the East 1/2 of Sec 17 ei C. B. PRELIMINARY PLAT, Town Centre 100 - 12th Addition/Mann Theaters Inc. , consisting of ' approximately 6.7 previously-zoned CSC (Community Shopping Center) acres within the yy Eagan Heights Commercial Park Planned Development, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT for a pylon sign and a VARIANCE for parking requirements located along the south side of Yankee Doodle Road, east of Yankee Place in the NE 1/4 of Sec 15 VIII. NEW BUSINESS (TAN) P (9 ,A. VARIANCE, Douglas P. Watschke, of 5' to the 5' parking and drive aisle setback ' requirement on Lot 1, Block 1, Norwest 1st Addition, located in the SW1/4 of Sec 10 1 i B. VARIANCE, Wesley Construction, of 15' to the required 50' building setback from Pilot g `t Knob Road, for Lot 1, Block 1, Hidden Valley, located in the NW1/4 of Sec 22 i q' C. SPECIAL USE PERMIT, Bill Brabec, to allow Christmas tree sales on Lot 3, Block 2, Knob Q1.2-(D Hill Professional Park, located in the SE1/4 of Sec 21 1 �I D. SPECIAL USE PERMIT, James Bartizal, to allow Christmas tree sales on Lot 3, Block 1, P' Thomas Lake Center, located in the SW1/4 of Sec 28 1 E. SPECIAL USE PERMIT, Troop #510, to allow Christmas tree sales on Lot 1, Block 1, Town � ' Centre 70 - 2nd Addition, located in the NW1/4 of Sec 15 (, F. SPECIAL USE PERMIT, Troop #345, to allow Christmas tree sales on Outlot D, Park Center 2 ` Addition, in the SW1/4 of Sec 30 �--((,G. PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AMENDMENT, New Ulm Enterprises, changing the use from an office V or medical clinic to a motel on Lot 2, Block 2, Rahncliff 3rd Addition, within the V , Rahncliff Planned Development located along the east side of Rahncliff Court in the NW1/4 of Sec 32 . PRELIMINARY PLAT, United Stationers Addition/R L Johnson Company, consisting of one Pt lot on approximately 12.4 LI (Light Industrial) acres located along the south side of Alexander Road, west of Highway 13 in the NE1/4 of Sec 8 s l I. PRELIMINARY PLAT, Town Centre 100 - 13th Addition/Eagan Heights Commercial Park, consisting of one lot and two outlots for future development, located along the west side of O'Leary Lane, north of Town Centre Drive in the NE1/4 of Sec 15 IX. ADDITIONAL ITEMS (GOLD) X. LEGISLATIVE/INTERGOVERNMENTAL AFFAIRS UPDATE (GREY) XI. ADMINISTRATIVE AGENDA (GREEN) XII. VISITORS TO BE HEARD (for those persons not on agenda) XIII. ADJOURNMENT The City of Eagan is committed to the policy that all persons have equal access to its programs, services, activities, facilities and employment without regard to race, color, creed, religion, national origin, sex, disability, age, marital status, sexual orientation or status with regard to public assistance. Auxiliary aids for persons with disabilities will be provided upon advance notice of at least 96 hours. If a notice of less than 96 hours is received, the City of Eagan will attempt to provide such aid. MEMO TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCILMEMBERS FROM: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES DATEr SEPTEMBER 16, 1993 SUBJECT: AGENDA INFORMATION FOR THE SEPTEMBER 21, 1993 CITY COUNCIL MEETING :ADOPT AGENDA/APPROVE MINUTES After approval is given to the September 21, 1993 City Council agenda, the regular meeting minutes for the September 7, 1993 City Council meeting and special meeting minutes for August 31, 1993 and September 7, 1993, the following items are in order for consideration. REEOGNITIGN IREFIGHTER El) ENGELHARD Volunteer Firefighter Ed Engelhard is retiring from the Eagan Volunteer Fire Department after the completion of 21 years of service. Firefighter Engelhard will be present at the City Council meeting, as will former Fire Chief Ken Southorn, representing Fire Chief Dale Nelson who will make a presentation to Firefighter Engelhard. The Mayor will also present a certificate to Firefighter Engelhard recognizing his many years of service as a volunteer firefighter. DEPARTMENT HEAT? BUSINESS: A. POLICE DEPARTMENT: Item 1. Request to Change Ordinance to Permit Indoor Splatball--At the September 7, 1993 City Council meeting, staff was directed to contact the city of St. Paul and discuss the indoor splatball operation, located at 601 North Prior Avenue, before any further consideration is given to an ordinance that would permit indoor splatball. Project Planner Ridley has completed this research and for a copy of his findings, refer to page ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To provide direction to the staff regarding an ordinance amendment to permit indoor splatball. )11t • MEMO _city of eagan TO: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR REICHERT FROM: PROJECT PLANNER RIDLEY DATE: SEPTEMBER 16, 1993 SUBJECT: SPLATBALL INDOOR I contacted John Hardwick, Zoning Officer for the City of St. Paul, regarding the above- referenced proposal and requested that he review the City of St. Paul's computer complaint files on Splatball Indoor at its 601 North Prior Avenue location. The only business-related complaint pertained to selling "smoke grenades". At this time, the City's Fire Marshal is trying to determine if these grenades should be considered an explosive/pyrotechnic. Eagan Fire Marshal Wegleitner was advised by the St. Paul Fire Marshal that they have no other complaints regarding the business. The applicant, Rick Nordberg, said he was not aware there was a potential problem selling the grenades, but he would be willing to discontinue selling this item. Also Mr. Nordberg states that in two years of operation, Splatball Indoor has a near perfect safety record with the most notable injury being a sprained thumb. In addition, I asked Eagan Police Sergeant Rick Swanson to check with the St. Paul Police Department for any problems/complaints they may have encountered. Rick spoke with Commander Wills who stated they had not had any problems with the business. It may be appropriate to add additional conditions limiting what items can be sold or offered as part of this business. If you have any further questions, please do not hesitate to contact me. /ileteZ Project Planner M R/js ■ a Agenda Information Memo September 21, 1993 City Council Meeting CONSENT AGEN There are nineteen (19) items on the agenda referred to as consent items requiring one (1) motion by the City Council. If the City Council wishes to discuss any of the items in further detail, those items should be removed from the Consent Agenda and placed under Additional Items unless the discussion required is brief. PERSONNEL ITEMS A. PERSONNEL ITEMS: Item 1. Health Insurance Requests for Proposal--The City of Eagan is required by law to advertise and solicit Requests for Proposal (RFP) for health insurance coverage for City of Eagan employees every five years. It has been four years since our last formal RFP for health insurance. The Insurance Committee which is comprised of employees of the City of Eagan has been meeting regularly to review the current health insurance situation and the draft request for proposals. The Personnel Committee met on Thursday, September 16, 1993, to review the draft RFP. A copy of the RFP as recommended for approval by the Personnel Committee is enclosed without page number. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the request for proposals as recommended by the Personnel Committee of the City Council and to direct the advertisement and solicitation of proposals. Item 2. Early Retirement Option--During the last legislative session (1993), the Minnesota Legislature approved a law which provides an early retirement option program for local government employees at the option of the city. If a city decides to offer this option, it would only be eligible for employees who have at least 25 years of combined credit in any state pension plan or who are at least 65 years of age with at least one year of combined credit,who are immediately eligible upon retirement from an annuity from a defined benefit plan and who are at least 55 years old. The employee must retire before January 31, 1994. The incentive which the City could choose to offer the employee would be an increase in the multiplier percentage used to calculate the retirement annuity for each year of service up to 30 years (the multiplier increase is .25). This option has no direct cost impact on the City of Eagan. We have had a request from one employee to consider offering this option. The employee does not know whether or not he/she wishes to retire at this time; however, he/she would like the option available if he/she so decides. If this option is offered it must be offered to all eligible employees. Also, the City Council must specifically act to hire a new person for the position. This item was reviewed by the Personnel Committee of the City Council and it is the committee's recommendation that this option be approved. Agenda Information Memo September 21, 1993 City Council Meeting A. PERSONNEL ITEMS (Con't): ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve offering an early retirement option to eligible employees wherein if they retire prior to January 31, 1994, the multiplier percentage used to calculate their retirement annuity will be increased by .25 for each year of service up to 30 years. Item 3. Resignation/Patrol Officer--The City of Eagan has received a letter of resignation from Patrol Officer John G. Serier II from his position as a patrol officer with the Eagan Police Department. Officer Serier is resigning order to make a career change to the investment/finance field. Attached on page ,5 is a copy of Officer Serier's letter of resignation. This position will be filled through adding an additional opening to the current two patrol officer openings for which the City is presently completing its hiring process. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To accept the resignation of John G. Serier II as a patrol officer from the Eagan Police Department and authorize filling the position. September 10 , 1993 Patrick Geagan Chief of Police Eagan Police Department 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan , Minnesota 55122 Dear Chief Geagan , It is with great regret that I submit this letter as my formal notice of resignation from the Eagan Police Department. This is to be effective as of September 26 , 1993 . My resignation as a police officer of this department is in no way a reflection of any negative feelings on my part towards the organization or the people working within it . Quite the opposite , it is a great detractor of my choice to leave what I believe to be one of the finest police departments in the state of Minnesota and undoubtedly in the nation . However , I have been given the opportunity to serve as a stockbroker/ investment advisor for the investment firm of Edward D. Jones and Co. This opportunity allows me to fulfill one of my longtime goals of entering the investment/finance field and to do so with an excellent company. The people of the Eagan Police Department have become a very important part of my life and one of the hardest things I have ever had to do was to make the decision to leave part of my "extended family. " I will always look back at my life as a part of the Eagan Police Department fondly and will be forever grateful to its people for their mentorship and friendship. Respectfully Submitted , • J hn G. Serier II S Agenda Information Memo September 21, 1993 City Council Meeting ADULT LITERACY WEEK PROCLAMATION B. Proclamation, Adult Literacy Week, September 27 - October 3--The City of Eagan has received a request from the Minnesota Valley ABE project to proclaim the week of September 27 - October 3 as Adult Literacy Week in the City of Eagan. Enclosed on pages through q are a copy of the letter of request from the Minnesota Valley ABE project and a copy of the proclamation. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To proclaim the week of September 27- October 3 as Adult Literacy Week in the City of Eagan. [7:;n,:, ,Ar.411eN' _:.,.:-, 1 m4 jr,4a Minnesot. Valley ,,, ':,--- ,:, . "C, ..,':- o o AiIE E Pro) ect „..,._ , District 196 - Community Education - Grace Site September 7, 1993 The Honorable Tom Egan, Mayor Co-Coordinators City of Eagan Cathy Koering Administrative Office, 3830 Pilot Knob Road Faith McCaghy Eagan, MN 55122 Site Coordinators Dear Mr. Egan: Kathryn DeLuca - 191 Cathy Koering - 196 On behalf of the Minnesota Valley Adult Basic Education (ABE) Project, I am Faith McCaghy - 192, 4, 5 writing to request that you pass the enclosed resolution at the next Eagan City Public Relations Council meeting declaring September 27 to October 3 to be Adult Literacy Week. Perilyn Olsen Minnesota Valley ABE Project serves adults in five Dakota County school districts Volunteer who wish to complete high school, brush-up on reading, writing, math skills or Organizer learn English as a Second Language (ESL). During the last year, from May 1, Sharon Heikkila 1992 - May 1, 1993, the project served 1,500 adults at 13 class sites located Diploma throughout northwestern Dakota County. Lead Teacher Joan Dornfeld According to the 1990 census, there were 18,000 adults living within the Project's service area who had not completed high school. This figure does not SERVING THE take into account the number of persons who have moved into the area in the last SCHOOL DISTRICTS few years, nor does it reflect the refugee/immigrant population. We are certain OF: that the number of adults needing our services will increase as the population increases. Burnsville - Eagan - Savage Thank you for bringing this urgent matter to the attention of the Eagan City Farmington Council, as we celebrate Adult Literacy Week. If you have any questions, or would like me to attend the Council Meeting, please contact me at the number Lakeville below. Randolph Sincerely, Rosemount /� Apple Valley - L -UCE /'zi-44-/ `b Eagan Claudia Kinville Public Relations 7800 WEST COUNTY ROAD 42 • APPLE VALLEY, MN 55124 . 431 -8316 r? CITY OF EAGAN PROCLAMATION MINNESOTA VALLEY ABE PROJECT ADULT LITERACY WEEK SEPTEMBER 27 - OCTOBER 3, 1993 WHEREAS, one in five Minnesotans cannot read; more than 15,000 adults over the age of 25 in Dakota County have not finished high school; many more are functionally illiterate -- or functioning below a ninth grade level in math, reading, writing skills and require English Literacy Training; and WHEREAS, many new Dakota County residents are immigrants from China, Iran, Laos, Vietnam, Cambodia, Thailand, Afghanistan, Japan, Yugoslavia, Russia, Venezuela, India, Honduras, Korea, Brazil, Hong Kong, Palestine, France and other countries, and need to learn English as their second language; and WHEREAS, the future requires a work force that has learned how to learn: by the year 2000, 65% of jobs will require education beyond high school, and only 4% of new jobs can be filled by people with the lowest skills; and WHEREAS, education takes place within communities whether at home, at work or at school, beginning in infancy, fostered by literate parents, and continuous throughout a lifetime of change and growth; and WHEREAS, adult learners bring with them life experiences, needs for childcare, easy access to sites, free or low cost classes, and a yearning for success within their communities; and WHEREAS, Minnesota Valley ABE Project is a consortium of community education departments of School Districts 191, 192, 194, 195, and 196 which provides free classes to adults, 16 and older, who are not currently enrolled in school; and WHEREAS, Minnesota Valley Adult Basic Education Project educates adults for success in jobs, families, and personal lives. The School for Adults offers classes for adults wishing to finish high school; improve English language skills, to enhance skills in reading, writing and math; and to provide family learning opportunities; NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that I, Thomas Egan, Mayor of the City of Eagan do hereby proclaim September 27 - October 3 as Adult Literacy Week and urge all citizens of Eagan to promote literacy in their area by either attending classes themselves, or referring individuals to classes;and by eliminating barriers which may prevent adults in this community from achieving their learning goals. CITY OF EAGAN CITY COUNCIL By: Its Mayor Attest: Its Clerk Motion made by: Seconded by: Those in favor: Those against: Dated: CERTIFICATION I, E.J. VanOverbeke, Clerk of the City of Eagan, Dakota County, Minnesota, do hereby certify that the foregoing proclamation was duly passed and adopted by the City Council of the City of Eagan, Dakota County, Minnesota, in a regular meeting thereof assembled this day of , 1993. E J. VanOverbeke, City Clerk City of Eagan Agenda Information Memo September 21, 1993 City Council Meeting WASTE REDUCTION WEEK PROCLAMATION C. Proclamation, Waste Reduction Week, September 27 - October 2--Enclosed on pages L through a- is a staff memorandum covering the City's proposed Waste Reduction Week activities to be held in connection with the state and county waste reduction activities. The memo also covers a copy of a proclamation designating September 27 - October 2 to be Waste Reduction Week in Eagan. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve a proclamation designating September 27 - October 2 to be Waste Reduction Week in the City of Eagan. TO: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES FROM: RECYCLING SPECIALIST MOGA DATE: SEPTEMBER 14, 1993 SUBJECT: WASTE REDUCTION WEEK PROCLAMATION Attached please find a proclamation making September 27 to October 2 Waste Reduction Week in the City of Eagan. Similar proclamations have been passed by Governor Arne Carlson and the Dakota County Board of Commissioners. There will be activities throughout the state aimed at educating the public on the importance of reducing the amount of waste we produce. Activities at the City include a Least Waste Potluck and rummage sale for City employees. The Eagan Cub Foods has agreed to have an information booth on waste reduction in conjunction with their Community Week from September 20-24. iA4S 21f/' ary Moga, 'ecycling Sp- 'alist CITY OF EAGAN WASTE REDUCTION WEEK PROCLAMATION WHEREAS: The City of Eagan is concerned about wise waste management and pollution prevention; and the City has exceeded its recycling goals for four years; and WHEREAS: The City of Eagan has its own in-house Waste Reduction and Procurement Policy Committee whose job it is to examine ways the City can reduce the amount of waste it produces; and the City Maintenance Facility is participating is a pilot waste reduction project in conjunction with Dakota County and the Office of Waste Management; and WHEREAS: The Minnesota Waste Management Act calls for reducing waste and pollution at their sources of generation; and WHEREAS: Statewide and City activities will revolve around the State of Minnesota's environmental hierarchy of reduce, reuse, and recycle; NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that I, Thomas Egan, Mayor of the City of Eagan, Minnesota, do hereby proclaim September 27 to October 2, 1993 be Waste Reduction Week in the City of Eagan. • CITY OF EAGAN CITY COUNCIL By: Its Mayor Attest: Its Clerk Motion made by: Seconded by: Those in favor: Those against: Dated: CERTIFICATION I, EJ. VanOverbeke, Clerk of the City of Eagan, Dakota County, Minnesota, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted by the City Council of the City of Eagan, Dakota County, Minnesota, in a regular meeting thereof assembled this day of , 1993. EJ. VanOverbeke, City Clerk City of Eagan Agenda Information Memo September 21, 1993 City Council Meeting COUNTY LANDFILL ABATEMENT FUNDING APPLICATION D. Appli ation, Dakota ounty Community Landfill Abatement Funding--Enclosed on pages 14 through 02 is a staff memorandum covering the proposed 1994 funding application for the County's landfill abatement program. The application has been prepared consistent with the proposed 1994 recycling budget and has been reviewed by the City's Solid Waste Abatement Commission. The application is required to be submitted on or before October 1, 1993. Program activities anticipated by the funding are outlined within the application. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the City's application for funding through the Dakota County Community Landfill Abatement program as presented. ATTACHMENT 1 1994 DAKOTA COUNTY COMMUNITY LANDFILL ABATEMENT FUNDING GUIDELINES Dakota County Board of Commissioners will provide landfill abatement funding assistance to communities in Dakota County. Dakota County Board Resolution No. 88-651 states that the County's portion of funding of recycling implementation and operating costs incurred by cities and townships will be through performance-based funding. A community requesting funding must demonstrate that a recycling program is currently in operation in its municipal buildings, that the program is consistent with the approved Dakota County Solid Waste Master Plan and that the Targeted Community Program outlined in the Dakota County Recycling Implementation Strategy, as amended, is maintained. At this time, the Target Community Program for single family dwellings includes at least bi weekly recyclables collection using a recycling container. All multi-family dwellings must also have recycling containers available. Under both programs, newspaper, cans (food & beverage) 3 colors of glass, corrugated cardboard, plastic containers with a neck and magazines must be collected for recycling. Dakota County Board Resolution 91-482 states that the County will reimburse recycling haulers for residential recyclables curbside/multi-family collection at a rate of $15. 00 per ton in 1994 . The County will also produce and distribute at least three recycling promotional items County-wide in 1994 . The County will accept the responsibility for community recycling programs and will assess the residents of the community for costs incurred (including the County's administrative, monitoring, and public education costs) in the event that a community does not maintain the level of service outlined in the Dakota County Recycling Implementation Strategy. APPLICATION/REVISION PROCEDURE Applications for funding of local landfill abatement activities for 1994 must be submitted no later than October 1, 1993 . Applications submitted after the specified deadline will not be considered. 1 ( (4 Applications will consist of the following: o Completion of Attachment 1: Application Form o An official resolution from the governing body requesting the funding allocation or a certified copy of the official proceedings at which the request was approved. Any changes or revisions in the request for funding must be submitted no later than July 1, of the funding year. This change must be requested on Attachment 2: Revision Request, and must be accompanied by the official resolution or certified copy of the proceedings approving such change. ELIGIBLE EXPENSES Eligible administrative expenses are the salary, benefits, and mileage for reasonable use of personal vehicles or personnel only while working directly, part-time or full-time, on the planning, implementation and promoting of eligible programs. Also included are subscriptions, memberships and training, not to exceed $300 per year. Eligible promotion/education costs are the production and distribution of flyers, brochures, newsletter articles, advertisements and posters necessary to promote residential and commercial recycling/reduction programs. FUNDING ALLOCATION: Communities over 5, 000 population are eligible to receive up to $2 . 00 per household, based on 1991 household estimates. Communities under 5, 000 population are eligible to receive up to $2. 00 per household, based on 1991 household estimates, with a $1, 000 base. Cities are encouraged to work together to cooperatively implement their recycling programs. REIMBURSEMENT PROCEDURES: Communities with an approved application for 1993 funding will receive 100% of approved costs which will be distributed in two installments according to the following schedule: Payment to Community: February 1 Assuming Joint Powers Agreement completed, no progress report required. CJ' 2 Payment to Community: August 1 Assuming July 15 Progress Report completed including residential tonnages collected through June 30, 1994 , and June 15 objectives are met, or such time as they are met. Progress reports must compare actual progress with the schedule in the application and should be submitted to the Dakota County Environmental Management Department. A 1993 Community Annual Report and a request for final evaluation must be made no later than January 30, 1995 and must include a completed Attachment 3 : Annual Report. In no event will the total amount given to a community exceed the amount shown on Attachment 4: Maximum Reimbursement Schedule - 1994. Based upon the Community Annual Report, the Monitoring Reports and the formula outlined below, a final evaluation of each community's performance will be made. The performance results for the year will be used to adjust the second quarter payment of the following year, if required. Dakota County reserves the right to request documentation for information submitted. o Met a 20% residential abatement 75 pts (3 . 75 points per 1% of waste abated) . Only 15% of tonnage used to calculate may be yardwaste. o Conducted promotional programs as 25 pts outlined in application and approved by the County. Adjustments to community payments will be based upon the following Performance-Based Funding Schedule: 50 pts. = 50% of net eligible costs reimbursed 51-75 pts = 75% of net eligible costs reimbursed 76-90 pts = 90% of net eligible costs reimbursed 91-100 pts = 100% of net eligible costs reimbursed Net eligible costs means project costs after deducting: - Other grants received for the project. - Revenues from the sale of recyclable materials and/or compost. (P 3 ATTACHMENT 1 1994 COMMUNITY LANDFILL ABATEMENT FUNDING APPLICATION City/Township: Eagan Date Submitted: September 21, 1993 Address: 3830 Pilot Knob Rd Program Period: 1/1/94 to Eagan, MN 55122 12/31 94 I. If this is a multi-community project, please list all participating communities and the lead community or agency for the project, and attach a copy of the Joint Powers Agreement. N/A II. Please provide a brief overview of 1994 abatement activities; indicated whether these are a continuation of existing programs expansion of existing programs; or new programs: (If more space is needed use extra sheet. ) See Attachment 1 . 4 / 1 Attachment 1 1994 Landfill Abatement Funding Application II. Overview of 1994 abatement activities Weekly curbside collection of recyclables is available for single family and four unit households the same day as trash collection. A number townhome complexes are also served. Residents are supplied with two stackable containers for recyclable materials. The materials collected curbside include: newspapers, glass, food and beverage cans, plastic bottles, corrugated cardboard, and magazines. Some haulers do collect additional materials. Residents living in multi-unit housing complexes (5+units) also have the opportunity to recycle. Collection systems vary from complex to complex. The most common system is the use of 90 gallon containers placed adjacent to or near trash enclosures. There are drop-off opportunities for aluminum cans and plastic (LDPE) grocery and produce bags. The local Cub Food Store and Rainbow Foods collect plastic bags. There is a recycling program in operation in City Buildings. All of the items in the curbside program are collected. With the change in refuse haulers, the City has been able to add additional types of paper to its office paper recycling program. With the work of an in-house committee, the City of Eagan is always examining ways to reduce waste in its daily operations. An aluminum can recycling program • continues in City parks. On January 1, 1993, the City's business recycling ordinance went into effect. Refuse haulers are required to offer recycling service to their business and commercial customers. Haulers must pick up at least two of the items from business that are collected in the curbside program. A yard waste compost site, run by a private vendor, operates in Eagan near Yankee Doodle and Elrene Roads. The City's Maintenance Facility is participating in a Source Reduction Grant, coordinated by Dakota County and a consulting firm. The Grant is funded by the OWM. The City is continually increasing its purchasing of recycled materials each year. This policy will take a written form in 1994 . C. 9 III. Complete the following section for all applicable activities, whether a continuation or expansion of existing activities or new activities for 1994 : A. Curbside Collection of Recyclables: 1. Number of households to be served: 18.716. . 2 . Frequency of collection: weekly bi weekly other 3 . Number of Residential Recycling Haulers: 16 • 4 . Materials collected (circle all that apply) : newspap e-i-> mixed paper food cans (ceverage cans h (g1as cs,; used oil L min corrugated cardboar� other (specify) Some haulers collect additional materials . 5 . Expected abatement from curbside: 4400 _ tons. B. Drop off Center for Recyclable Materials: 1. For each drop-off center please provide: a. Operator: Gary Bergstrom, Store Manager Address: Cub Foods, Cliff Lake Rd. Days/Hours of Operation: Same as store hours. Materials Collected: Aluminum cans, plastic (LDPE) and paper bags. b. Operator: Rainbow Foods Address: Town Center Drive, Eagan Days/Hours of Operation: Same as store hours. Materials Collected: Plastic (LDPE) bags 2 . Expected abatement from Drop Offs: 40 tons. (_C\ mommommommm C. Multi Family Recycling 1. Total number of units served: 7 , 200 . 2. Total number of buildings served: 335 . 3. Frequency of collection/collection method(s) used (description) : See Attachment 2. 4 . Materials collected (circle all that apply) : news a er mixed paper food can (beverage cans glass1' plastics ) used oil (magazines:" corrugated cardboard other (specify) 5. Expected abatement from multi family units: 600 tons. D. Yard Waste Program 1. Please provide a brief description of the community's role in yard waste collection. See Attachment 2 . 2 . Drop off: (Complete the following only if this is a community owned/operated yard waste collection site) . Location: N/A flours: Fees: 3 . Expected yard waste abatement in 1994 (curbside/drop off) : (cCY' tons. 6 Attachment 2 [Multi-Family C.3. Most operate with containers for recycled materials adjacent to trash enclosures. Some buildings have separate container areas in parking garages or free spaces. Collection is a minimum of once a week. Yard Waste D. 1. Refuse haulers may collect separate yard waste from residents. Back yard composting by residents is still increasing. There is a yard waste compost site in operation in Eagan located at Yankee Doodle and Elrene Roads. 'zr=.<2 E. Describe any commercial/industrial recycling activities you will undertake in 1994 (this is not a required program) . See Attachment 3 . F. Describe program specification public education/promotional activities that will be undertaken in 1994. residential: a minimum of one written communications must be sent to each household in 1994. See Attachment 3 . institutional (schools) : a minimum of 4 presentations must be made in schools in 1994 . See Attachment 3 . commercial/industrial See Attachment 3 . G. Describe your in-house recycling/procurement program. See Attachment 3 . IV. Work Plan Dakota County will distribute any approved funding in two equal payments, provided communities meet specified development objectives. Please provide a work plan for 1994 and highlighted the objectives to be met by the following dates: See Attachment 4 . o June 15 o December 31 7 Attachment 3 E. Eagan's commercial recycling ordinance went into effect on January 1, 1993. Haulers are required to offer recycling service for at least two of the materials collected curbside to their business customers. There will be continued technical assistance for waste reduction and recycling as requested by businesses. The City also distributes white office paper recycling boxes when requested. A survey to Chamber of Commerce members was recently distributed and the results of the survey will help determine future business recycling activities performed by the City. F. Describe program specification public education/promotional activities that will be undertaken in 1994. residential: Eagan publishes and distributes four citywide newsletters per year. Each newsletter has a four page section on recycling information. There will be at least one citywide brochure for the year which will cover program basics and other information. There will be other promotional efforts such as newspaper articles and ads. - institutional (schools) : There will be four to six school visits with some of these centered around Earth Day activities. - commercial/industrial: Possible meeting or workshop with the Chamber of Commerce on business recycling. G. Describe you in-house recycling/procurement program. There is collection of the six items collected curbside at all three City buildings. The City continues to increase its purchase of recycled materials and a written policy will be put into place in 1994 . There is also a committee composed of a representative from each department of the City the meets regularly regarding recycling and waste reduction issues. The City is also participating in a waste reduction grant through Dakota County and funded by the OWM. Attachment 4 1994 Landfill Abatement Funding Application 1994 Work Plan DATE PROGRAM ELEMENT 1/30/94 Community Annual Report Due 1/94 to 6/94 Continued program promotion -monthly newspaper display ads -multi-family promotion -2 citywide newsletter distributions with sections on recycling/waste reduction information -2-4 school presentations -citywide flyer Final recommendations from source reduction pilot project will be examined for implementation 2/1/94 Payment one disbursed 4/94 Earth Day Celebration 5/94 Community Clean-up Day 7/94 to 12/94 Continued Program Promotion -monthly newspaper display ads • -multi-family promotion -2 citywide newsletter distributions with sections on recycling information -school presentations 7/94 Program Revision Due 7/4/94 Fourth of July Parade 7/15/94 Progress Report Due 8/1/94 Payment two disbursed V. Budget January 1, 1994 to December 31, 1994 . County Community Reimbursement Share Total Administrative Costs: Direct Salaries 11, 139 1,353 12,492 Direct Mileage 0 400 400 Direct Membership/Training 300 300 600 Other Promotional Education: Residential Printing 12 ,900 0 12 ,900 Residential Distribution 8, 100 0 8, 100 Commercial Printing 1, 500 0 1, 500 Commercial Distribution 1,500 0 1, 500 Other 2, 000 0 2 , 000 Other Costs: Reference Materials 100 100 Local Meeting Expenses 900 900 Dues and Subscriptions 200 200 TOTAL 37 . 439 * 3 ,253 40, 692 Requested funding $37 .439 from County**: * Unexpended funds may not be carried over to 1994. ** Request may not exceed that amount shown on the Maximum Reimbursement Schedule - Attachment 4 . Agenda Information Memo September 21, 1993 City Council Meeting LIQUOR LICENSE/HOLIDAY INN E. License, Liquor, Change Managers for Holiday Inn, 2700 Pilot Knob Road--The manager of the Holiday Inn located at 2700 Pilot Knob Road has changes. Therefore, it is necessary for the City Council to approve a liquor license for the new manager of that facility, John Zavada. The Police Department has investigated this license application and finds no reason to deny the issuance of the liquor license in the name of the Holiday Inn/ John Zavada. Enclosed without page number is a copy of the investigator's report regarding this item. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve a liquor license in the name of Holiday Inn/John Zavada. c;2 � Agenda Information Memo September 21, 1993, City Council Meeting ACKNOWLEDGE COMPLETION/FINAL PYMT & CITY MAINTENANCE F. Contract 92-09,Acknowledge Completion,Final Payment&City Maintenance(Great Oaks & Woodlands North 2nd Additions - Streets & Utilities)--The installation of public streets and utilities to service the Great Oaks Addition and the Woodlands North 2nd. Addition has been completed according to the plans and specifications, and all final. inspections have verified satisfactory compliance. With the final payment being processed on the September 7 Council meeting, it is appropriate for the Council to formally acknowledge the completion, final payment and authorization for City maintenance subject. to related warranty provisions. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To acknowledge completion and final payment of Contract 92-09 (Great Oaks & Woodlands North 2nd Additions - Streets & Utilities) and authorize perpetual City maintenance subject to all related warranty provisions. VACATION/TOWN CENTRE 70 - 2ND & 11TH ADDITIONS G. Vacate Public Utility Easement (Town Centre 70 •• 2nd & 11th Additions)--On June 15, a public hearing was held to consider the vacation of various drainage and utility easements within the Town Centre 70 2nd & 11th Additions to accommodate the proposed. final plat the Town Centre 70 - 15th Addition (Kohls Department Store). Enclosed on. page ��. is a legal description and graphic showing the location of the easements proposed to be vacated. The only concern raised at that public hearing was by the Public Works Department who wanted to ensure that the affected utilities were properly relocated. within newly dedicated easements prior to vacating the existing easements and alignments. Subsequently, the City Council closed the public hearing and continued consideration of vacating these easements until such time as the final plat was considered for approval and. the relocation of the utilities and the rededication of the necessary easements were committed through an executed development agreement and secured with adequate financial securities. With the approval of the final plat for the Town Centre 70 - 15th Addition. scheduled for the September 21 agenda, it would be appropriate for the City Council to take final action on this petitioned vacation. The Public Works Department's concerns have been properly addressed in the development agreement for this final plat. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the vacation of drainage and utility easements as described within Town Centre 70 - 2nd & 11th Additions and. authorize its recording simultaneously with the final plat for the Town Centre 70 - 15th. Addition. ai1 I ^ `1 i > a a+ t 7 m u _-___ C• p• i 0 4. • ` I -_1 !1, o? .`i ?:12 `:' :r`: 1'•1 :� r..l 0 m 3n80,00.I S 89'288 4 OS sob — — — — — _ , i in -- _ --- 4�� - - . - __ - - ---l. -• n r I1 • I Z . I i< , S• ta N f f8 , N �. -- — • 1N3N3Stl3 J !� ONtl 39tlNItlNO d0 3NIl!l3YN30t F m m ^ 3„IC,Zb.O S 1 3„IC,2b.0 S -- - IL” =bbf06 t_ -- 0 9 092— --- — ' gyp\ ; 7 1 J1• 7� M1 Ti Oa u •3 ds \ Q r� yN of o -) . �`�•\�� W o {�:J aN m . 1 .1 0 i NN °� r, Z d : „ — N 1 . ' I / -1 1 O 7; I w y- ►- 0 (5) (_.).3 f'�e -, __ I Nm '' 4 1. ---\._ mo °� I a� 1, 0 Im. \ .,3 \ . . , .. _ _ a m b r-• - 1 N �' `� 3 W • �, .'a • I• A..a, 11 O I W cn v v a L m ■ )40i - Fl C It II 6,I.0 � rn OEft O� I I J I M c .0 OS •- - NI 7, 4 r` I _ I r •• o 1 yt vu vy a co- - - J i _ • -/ I ,y O w n m n M i sf C rn • w co rn d m G OM w `` /�/ 3,.IS,...,O_s: ∎ i `..• C4 • $ i7 O • . >,C1F 0 � . / / _'�,t / a ■1 II _, 00 el t,i Er n v r- .-, y a3 H > Bt. S ' - e b1: tl. +� �y` // - te O to O 7.-I L C �,,AA b --00'062--- ' ed g0 W 43 ro N Z -8 •.9. ,�1• 0 - 006 o c m • 33 p: :di v C Ci0,7U V f ao� p iFL "F. OG w ci H e 1. B Cr ro 2CI.C :g \ 4.0 IV • .1 . ....4, •:1 tr-I . j EI w q 173 w it, t0 0 n a3 U ,,..„08 / . .' Z cia O • t, O 4).-I 0 : ... -.4 •,‹;4„;.//,.1, ,' = c N\ , 5 � U C a33 1 u ~, v i + V .4 i s a - 0 J 0 .-4 w. •:2 Q W ei 0 U IJ O c N L to \ 0 _.. O 4413312 O 0 •p 04:4 p C i"''tcOOOO11 � �' • ii °04o3 H O� Q \ • [N� bbO I Aiv.1 liv, , a, , a% $ . ,. w .. i 4/ 7, ,r • Agenda Information Memo September 21, 1993 City Council Meeting FINAL PLAT/LAKEVIEW TRAILS 2ND ADDITION H. Final Plat, Lakeview Trails 2nd Addition--Final plat documents are in the process of being finalized by the applicant and City staff. If they are completed and executed in time for Tuesday's meeting, this item will be in order for consideration by the City Council. if not, staff will recommend that it be continued at the time of agenda approval. For a copy of the :final plat as it appears for recording at Dakota County, please refer to page‘30 ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve a final plat for Lakeview Trails 2nd Addition as presented. i Vii; ii ili 1 iloi �j: ii ! I t�i= = j i I . 1 1'� _" 1i� E = 1 • 3': ixi i, t4. L sq.:, nip 1 zos 1 I f 1 i ;, a a _ l �1 ! ` iI g+pt 1 1 iI i! i a s: • ist ;; t s • lift :! a lij y t I i?i :tit i i - !s i s =I3. Il �! ;s=i r 1 3 + 1 t==i '1 3 El! it 'I + i. t} = } i I I sii.= i II ; _) i it •; ii s � __'; _ - �: j '1li .1=fit. _ I/I a je_i {; �! ill;i i , I I;_ ,l1 l/zit i!s ! '-i:i i! ° . / ,, Ii, a+ 1 d +- 1 '• i ialt .�► ri Ill/ 2.! • i Sd_:l + ! is I f I fr g� i •-.- . _ Dili _ _ 1 0 i"s_ i tZI e� + � + Fi C Q �_ t illi VI wwfi, -, col I 1 CV ,t) il ; Pli � , I r cn W W .,� 1 11211 L) / 0 / �\ 1 w I I W 'r`-'� `t� ) 'i I• t�o•..� ` 3 *ras•r ar..��.w S8 ....1 / . fir,r— ,. _ —•, --- �-% i'',./..F I ,. _ `' a ! I- i I'to.^: ► �a, _ _ ,$ ' I a,• T, 1 ! 11 L 1 . Iris .1.s l' ., t tv J A \ H = ei • -, gc IN ii II } O ti 3D Agenda Information Memo September 21, 1993 City Council Meeting FINAL PLAT/AUTUMN RIDGE 4TH ADDITION I. Final Plat,Autumn Ridge 4th Addition--Final plat documents are in the process of being finalized by the applicant and City staff. If they are completed and executed in time for Tuesday's meeting, this item will be in order for consideration by the City Council. If not, staff will recommend that it be continued at the time of agenda approval. For a copy of the final plat as it appears for recording at Dakota County, please refer to page,._. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve a final plat for Autumn Ridge 4th Addition as presented. 3 1 q1 1 1 . a ti �I '-2 C-io CCCa s I �I r 1 1 � I •...• Ji "")/I/ 7 O i. Ill �♦ C 041.1.— ..i I \ //^/ q ''ocbr i 8 a ^y, :,-. 2 E �,`��,, , t b L 7 b s — J I a J J 1 1 01 1.1J M ,..m I B W I r .. 1.1_� •t 4 . 1. ;I 111 r .t 6 •0 8 .0 8 it 1ft < t : I Q 1 _' ' �YS 1 W J r_ .i.r�i..ms J Th ,tn.00s _ I �$ 'BI FJ 1b •.1 8 1 o Z 5 _ LJ- 1 L. . J I L 1 1 • L ..«� _ 1 C :.r.'. J I N rI ES B H e > E • t f Y c` t '1 - .) ?P • O R y 1 i_ I r~ _� �: y r OVOJ I DOOa y t o yOt4D s 't 2L la fs E y 6` I • • Agenda Information Memo September 21, 1993 City Council Meeting FINAL PLAT/TOWN CENTRE 70 - 15TH ADDITION J. Final Plat, Town Centre 70 - 15th Addition--Final plat documents are in the process of being finalized by the applicant and City staff. If they are completed and executed in time for Tuesday's meeting, this item will be in order for consideration by the City Council. If not, staff will recommend that it be continued at the time of agenda approval. For a c py of the final plat as it appears for recording at Dakota County, please refer to pag TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve a final plat for Town Centre 15th - Addition as presented. 4- ; , : ; 11.: : • : • 1 • ; 1 Ji 3 51 1:1 "• i •i-t 1 ..t.; • i ' , • I: -. ii2 ! :LA. ii i .• 1 • ;1* , ."1 1 • 41 • 1! .:i 111 : ,•■■• 1 I.: I :1 i • 1.1 2 : : • 1 .- 1 p i , ! I ; : .; I: 'd 1 .!. 1 1; . 2 7• -1 . 1 . • - -• :i • 22; "• 1 12. • --.i I' :2 7 ! ,- ' 11 ' i• • . . ; : 2 1 : T i 1 2 12.: 3 i I.! %di: • . ' 1 :, I 11; 1 41„! I f 1..i!.l,...:;1 i: f1L11i4:1: i= i i 1*s1t 2 i.1• :: 1 1.,- 1. : 21 , iv . ..2(71 • : 01 0 , i ; 1 li 1 ' I ifl: 2 21:! ! '.. ' '2% : i i" - :- ; :3 • 3 4 .; i 1.i• ! 3 . %.: 21921 i . j:. ; : ' ! 1 .1 ii i i l' ' ;i3 . ;.i 8 1: 1 1 if i q ;.:.:! , .: - , ir . .-!:1 :Of]; ; 3 • 3. 1 • ; 1 i I '' : ; •.--t • -. I - 1 1 : 11-4:;,:: li .i-t ; I .. ! I 1J: ; i;iiii if i . i 1 L 3 1 1 -2: .11 -12: :2 .! 11 " j ! i=i% I 'li711 .. 2 • t - il gi! ; ! li 1 i - i II 1 P. 1 1:i1:91 '1 3: : i ji i f !rs. i • .1„ .1 : 1 1 i.; . • . . . I . ! ! i211.1* 1. Lail • I. • 1 il ! i •s-i i Pi:11 il il' ; K 1 C 21 1 1 11. 1 1 1: ..x -; 2 2 11!- i ;;-, s s .41 ; i ' 2 - ; - . . - ' ' :;1 il ifil I - 4- 4 - -1 .1 1'31.'1 • ' I 2; 2 • -• i 1 8 i ' - . / ■1 Z /1•1!i 2 rirli U 3' ' - i 1 j i II .. I . ;F.': 1 4I-1,01 sli • ii2 • :L'I'l ; .. • 3! , g.. :.1.;:': 3.1 :%..3 . 1 ..'7 :: I II II. - : :_ : :1 i . : 1 - .1i , 111 -:.:1 1 i .7- ; I!" . li:: .-. ,I. 1-- - t Ifiziss ! i 1 i Ili 4 4:111: t-1 11 .1S : 1 I :t.- t 1 I 1 i ' fl : 1.:1 .:1: ftf 2: 4: i a il 3 2: i iiiii1.3 :if 11 is a a a -. .1. I ' • 4' 1-ill: 113 it ' '2 I I . 1 1 11 1 1 • ..33 ill ll 11 il il Ili::: ...:141 li 11 . 11 11 il 2 12* 1 -21 fte ::0::73 30 3:(1;ei ISIiiir:_i 0 2 -----__ _ 3 11-•.:■17.:* ---------i----- :■•37.-.:4 i,: : 0 'If g:i e . .. 4 i . /7! 11 ...... o . . ..-.J ... ,-, 4 11. .:.1.r.,) i f / ::8 / I < •. , n 0 r. H , -... I i 1 .'1 / X i q I ,.:, , 1 ___ eZ:__ ___ _L .ii-is ..y / I e 4.4 1-114.2 \ ■• . . LU ,d, ... .,..•,k-//, ..,:\ 4 / . Lii - w s- .. / : / •b L1 • 2 • i / w 21. :• u e q. s• ii ..--- 2! . ... Ifl : I . x I I 12. .1 Lt - !&71 4 1- . i II !I 11 77 '*•;• Li- : i x n 1 lic 1 fil I ; u I . s t ' liti m ' I 3 0: 1 o w 1 ' 13 t " l' -1 .., .., 7 . 64 a' sem ia i: I i 4 tfl 21-3/ -.1t•- . v.,__ ..,„.....• I ' I __I -e:31 A§ ...\ ), :: i,:. 0 A II L.; ! 1 :1 Eli - .__ Id, vi :Is r's IAD -. II II: i; i 1 a: -----,----.! a i F" II 1 Z >. • n . -. :-.. . • LAJ I --- -zo, - I /1 •-lr, JAI... I 3; biz i (-) 4, 0 -2 „ 4 ri -11. i 1 i JJJ Z , I 1 Off Iiii 3 , 1 ---... .i.,.., - . 1,F;;I I i ., --..., „...., ii ; .G.,. .4 1.,. ....:‘,.•.,• •• la I: / II 2 11 .., ..-* 1 013 I I Illit i • lilii • • 1 .4-.5 ----' Agenda Information Memo September 21, 1993 City Council Meeting APPOINTMENT OF NEW HEARING EXAMINER TOBACCO LICENSE SUSPENSION K. Authorize Appointment of New Hearing Examiner, Tobacco License for Suspension--In official action at the July 6, 1993 Eagan City Council meeting, staff was directed to pursue enforcement of section 6.34 of the City Code as written which section permits a suspension or revocation of a license to sell tobacco when the licensee has violated the conditions of the license, and to appoint Kandis Hanson as a hearing officer regarding a specific case/ violation of the code. Unfortunately, Administrative Intern Hanson resigned from her position in order to become City Administrator at the city of Eyota prior to the date of the hearing. It is the recommendation of City Administrator Hedges that the City's current Administrative Intern, Joyce Pruitt, be appointed as hearing officer for this matter and that the hearing be rescheduled. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To pursue enforcement of section 6.34 of the City Code as written, to appoint Joyce Pruitt as hearing officer, and to reschedule the hearing. CITY COMMENTS/COUNTY LONG-TERM SOLID WASTE FUNDING L. Authorize Correspondence, Dakota County Long-Term Solid Waste Funding Program-- Enclosed on pageS374Ois draft correspondence prepared by Recycling Specialist Moga concerning work being done by the County Solid Waste Management Advisory Committee concerning long-term solid waste funding. As noted in the correspondence, it has been the City's position that dedicated solid waste abatement funds such as landfill surcharges and state recycling transfer funds flow to the county and not directly to individual cities. As such, to the extent that the county encourages its constituent cities to undertake solid waste abatement and recycling activities, these funds should continue to be passed through at an adequate level to the cities for those programs. The time frame of this study by the county • has precluded an opportunity to review this correspondence with the Solid Waste Abatement Commission. It does, however, reflect in large part previous policy statements by the commission and the city with respect to solid waste funding. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To authorize correspondence to Dakota County concerning the Long-Term Solid Waste Funding program as presented. TO: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES FROM: RECYCLING SPECIALIST MOGA DATE: SEPTEMBER 15, 1993 SUBJECT: LONG TERM FUNDING LETTER The City of Eagan received a letter from Mike O'Connor Chair of the Dakota County Solid Waste Long Term Funding Subcommittee. The letter requested cities in Dakota County inform the Subcommittee on future program funding needs for cities recycling programs. City administrators and Mayors received copies of this letter. Attached you will find the City of Eagan's response to this letter for approval by the City Council. I am also including a copy of Chair O'Connor's letter. diLlALi At&ea' M. "Moga, R cling Speci.flst 1 I 5e-1 KOTA COUNTY BARRDYC. S OR ICT (612)891.7011 ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT FAX(612)891-7031 (IDA COj� 14955 GALAXIE AVENUE APPLE VALLEY MINNESOTA 55124-8579 September 7, 1993 Mary Moga, Recycling Coordinator City of Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55122 Dear Mary: Options for County funding of local government solid waste abatement activities for 1995 - 1997 are being reviewed by a Dakota County advisory committee. The Long Term Funding Subcommittee is discussing what are the solid waste abatement roles of local government for 1995 through 1997 and what are the local government funding needs from the County in order to accomplish them. To assist the Subcommittee in this review, please submit a letter outlining what you would like your City's solid waste program to be for 1995-97 and what are your funding needs by September 22nd to Dakota County Environmental Management Department, Attn: Gavle Prest, 14955 Galaxie Avenue, Apple Valley, MN 55124 . Dakota County has provided funding to local governments for solid waste abatement activities in two, three year funding rounds, from 1989-1991, and from 1992-1994 . Funding provided to local governments comes from the Solid Waste Management Enterprise Fund which is made up from over 12 sources including the County surcharge at the landfill and SCORE funds. The local government Recycling Coordinator has played an integral part in building the successful solid waste abatement program that exists in Dakota County today, including program implementation, keeping Councils and Department Managers informed, and educating the public. The outlook for 1995 through 1997 is that there is much work to be done on waste reduction, continued public education, commercial waste management, household hazardous waste, organic composting, and reaching a goal of 60% abatement by the year 2000. Please take time to consider these questions thoughtfully and be visionary in planning what will be the roles and funding needs of your community to implement a successful solid waste management program in Dakota County for 1995 through 1997. If you have any questions, please call Gayle Prest at Dakota County at 891-7025. Sincerely, Mike O'Connor, Chair Dakota County Solid Waste Long Term Funding Subcommittee cc: Mayor , U City Administrator Printed on Recycled Paper AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER city of ecigcin THOMAS EGAN Mayor PATRICIA AWADA SHAWN HUNTER SANDRA A. MASIN September 15, 1993 THEODORE WACHTER Council Members THOMAS HEDGES City Administrator Mike O'Connor, Chair E.J. VAN OVERBEKE Long Term Funding Subcommittee City Clerk Department of Environmental Management 14955 Galaxie Avenue Apple Valley, MN 55124-8579 Dear Chair O'Connor: I would like to thank you and the Long Term Funding Subcommittee for giving the City of Eagan the opportunity to give our input on the future direction of County funding to cities in Dakota County. In action taken at its meeting of September 21, 1993 , the Eagan City Council directed staff to make the following comments in that regard. Under separate cover, you will be receiving a letter with items on which the recycling staffs of the various cities reached consensus. There are some points I would like to emphasize from that letter which the City of Eagan believes to be particularly important. First, it is imperative for cities to maintain maximum latitude to plan the direction of their recycling programs until the County Board makes a final decision on the management of solid waste in Dakota County. In addition, cities will need more flexibility with regard to program funding amounts and eligibility requirements if there are any additional expectations from the County including increases in abatement goals and the expansion of the cities' role in commercial/industrial recycling and waste reduction. The City would also like to see a continuation of the Special Assistance Grant Program. The program allows for projects to be tailored to the special needs and circumstances of each city. It also allows for the formulation of innovative projects in individual communities. The list of eligible items should be expanded to further encourage this. The City is not advocating funding without accountability. Eagan has a good record of encouraging recycling. The City has always met or exceeded its recycling goals. The City does an excellent job of educating its residents on recycling issues. Eagan is one MUNICIPAL CENTER THE LONE OAK TREE MAINTENANCE FACILITY 3830 PILOT KNOB ROAD 3501 COACHMAN POINT THE SYMBOL OF STRENGTH AND GROWTH IN OUR COMMUNITY EAGAN,MINNESOTA 55122-1897 EAGAN,MINNESOTA 55122 PHONE:(612)681-4600 PHONE:(612)681-4300 FAX:(612)681.4612 Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employei FAX:(612)681-4360 TDD:(612)454-8535 �Q TD D:(612)454-8535 of the few cities in the County with an in-house committee to examine ways to reduce waste in City activities and a citizen advisory commission on solid waste issues. The City of Eagan is committed to operating a viable recycling program, however, fiscal realities put limits on the programs and types of services cities can provide their residents, including recycling. The County has access to the primary solid waste abatement funding sources, namely landfill surcharge fees and SCORE funds. The City of Eagan only has access to these funds through the County. It is necessary for the County to continue to show its support by maintaining adequate funding and latitude of local program operations. Again, thank you for this opportunity to share the City's views regarding future funding from the County. Sincerely, Mary Moga Recycling Specialist LiS) Agenda Information Memo September 21, 1993 City Council Meeting TRANSFER OF AUTOMOBILE/POLICE DEPARTMENT M. Transfer of Automobile, Drug Task Force to Police Department--It is the recommendation of Chief of Police Geagan that the City of Eagan purchase a Toyota Camry from the South Metro Drug Task Force for use by the department's school liaison. Enclosed on page 9-3_ is a copy of a memo from Chief of Police Geagan regarding this item. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the purchase of a Toyota Camry from the South Metro Drug Task Force for use by the City of Eagan's school liaison officer. police department PATRICK GEAGAN Chief of Police RICHARD SWANSON ' Captain Administration&Investigation city of eoc�on JAMES SEWALD Captain Patrol 3830 PILOT KNOB ROAD THOMAS EGAN EAGAN, MINNESOTA 55122-1897 Mayor PHONE:(612)681-4700 TDD: (612)454-8535 PATRICIA AWADA FAX: (612)681-4738 SHAWN HUNTER September 14, 1993 SANDRA A. MASIN THEODORE WACHTER Council Members THOMAS HEDGES TO: TOM HEDGES, CITY ADMINISTRATOR CityAdministrator E.J. VAN OVERBEKE FROM: PATRICK J. GEAGAN, CHIEF OF POLICE City Clerk SUBJECT: PROCUREMENT OF AUTOMOBILE For :budget year 1992, a decision was made to take Police vehicles to 100, 000 miles. It was a good decision. However, the Department now finds itself in a position where we have three vehicles at 100,000 miles with no replacements. These vehicles were mostly used by non-sworn personnel. At this time, we are proposing elimination of three vehicles: Squad 15, Suburban; Squad 31, Chevrolet Caprice; and Squad 32, Ford Crown Victoria. Public Works is having an auction in November where we will sell these vehicles and should get some money for them. We are also proposing the purchase of the Toyota Camry which was used by our last Drug Task Force agent. Our current Drug Task Force agent is using a car we received in a forfeiture. In August, • 1993 , Captain Swanson asked the South Metro Drug Task Force Board if they would approve a motion for Eagan to purchase the Toyota for $6, 000. The motion passed. Our School Liaison, Doug Matteson, will be using the Toyota. We are requesting that the money for this purchase come from unused Capital Outlay monies, namely, money proposed for 6 Portable Radios which will not be purchased this year. With the elimination of certain positions and other changes in staffing, we feel replacing one car at this time will be sufficient. However, we will be monitoring the situation closely. The Department is mindful of budget constraints of the city, but at the same time we are in need of vehicles. We hope these proposals will meet with your approval. Patrick J. Geagan Chief of Police \ THE LONE OAK TREE . . . THE SYMBOL OF STRENGTH AND GROWTH IN OUR COMMUNITY Equal Opportunity/Affirtive Action Employer Agenda Information Memo September 21, 1993 City Council Meeting PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AMENDMENT/PONDVIEW ADDITION N. Ratify Amendment to Planned Development Agreement, Pondview Addition--At its meeting of April 5, 1993, the City Council approved an amendment of the Pondview Planned Development Agreement to permit the construction of a Class II restaurant on Lot 1, Block 2, of the Duckwood Crossings subdivision. The Planned Development Agreement document has been amended to reflect that action. A copy of the amended agreement is enclosed on pages Ct through S.,2___for your review. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To ratify the amendment to the Planned Development Agreement for the Pondview Addition as presented. • AMENDMENT PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT PONDVIEW 'THIS AMENDMENT, made this 5th day of April, 1993, by and between the CITY OF EAGAN, a Minnesota municipal corporation (hereinafter the 'City'), and Four Crowns Inc., a Wisconsin corporation, (hereinafter the 'Applicant). WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Eagan is the official governing body of the City of Eagan; and WHEREAS, the City and Pilot Knob Developers, original Owner and Developer entered into a Planned Development Agreement for Pondview Addition (hereinafter the `Agreement' as amended) on the 12th day of July, 1988; and WHEREAS, the Agreement was amended on the 15th day of August, 1989, by the Duckwood Crossings amendment; and WHEREAS, the Agreement and any amendments thereto, run with the land until terminated and are binding upon the successors and assigns of the original Owner and Developer; and WHEREAS, the Eagan City Code and the Agreement provide for amendments to said Agreement upon application of the original Owner or its successors and assigns and approval of the City pursuant to the Eagan City Code; and WHEREAS, Four Crown, Inc. is the Owner and successor in interest of Lot 1, Block 2, Duckwood Crossings, which is located directly south of Crestridge Drive on the east side of Pilot Knob Road in the City of Eagan, Councy of Dakota, State of Minnesota, as shown on Exhibit `A" attached hereto; and WHEREAS, the Applicant has applied for an amendment to Exhibit A of the Agreement to allow a Class II restaurant on the site, as shown in Exhibit 'B' attached hereto; and WHEREAS the Advisory Planning Commission of the City did hold a public hearing on March 23, 1993 and did recommend approval of the amendment to the Agreement on that date; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City did review the amendment to the Agreement on April 5, 1993, and did concur with the recommendation of the Advisory Planning Commission to approve an amendment to the Agreement as amended. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby agreed to and between the parties hereto as follows: 1. The Agreement shall be further amended to revise Exhibit "A" of the Pondview Planned Development Agreement as amended, to allow a Class II restaurant on Lot 1, Block 2, Duckwood Crossings. 2. The Agreement shall be amended to include specific conditions to the development as set forth herein. All other requirements of the Agreement, • except as otherwise amended, shall remain in full force and effect as fully set forth in the Agreement. Said specific conditions are: (A) A planned development agreement amendment shall be executed. (B) The trash/recycling containers shall be attached to the building per the site plan. (C) The landscape plan shall conform to the overall Planned Development landscape plan. (D) An irrigation system shall be installed for all green areas. (E) An overall sign exhibit as shown in Exhibit 'C" shall be submitted as an attachment to the Planned Development Amendment indicating: 1)building-mounted signs depicting size of letters, colors, and location; 2) directional signs, height, location, and color; and 3) the location of the pylon sign. J (F) The development is required to maintain a 50 foot buffer zone above the HWL of Pond JP-3. (G) The grading plan shall be revised to provide a maximum slope of 2 to I. (H) Drainage from this development shall connect to the existing 12" storm sewer stub provided from Crestridge Drive. (I) The sanitary sewer service line from the 8" sanitary sewer line in Pilot Knob Road to the proposed building shall include a manhole at the right-of-way line of Pilot Knob Road. (J) tf grading is performed by this developer on the adjacent property, written permission will need to be obtained prior to grading permit issuances. (K) Screening of rooftop mechanical equipment is required. 3. This Agreement shall run with the land until terminated and shall be binding upon the successors and assigns of the Applicant. 4. This Agreement shall become part of the original Agreement, fully binding upon the parties, as if fully set forth in the Agreement. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement on the day and year first above written. CITY OF EAGAN, a Minnesota municipal corporation By: Thomas A. Egan tts: Mayor By: E.J. VanOverbeke Its: City Clerk 4c0 FOUR CROWNS, INC., a Wisconsin corporation By: Its: By: Its: STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF DAKOTA ) On this day of , 19_, before me a Notary Public within and for said County, personally appeared THOMAS A. EGAN and E.J. VANOVERBEKE to me personally know, who being each by me duly sworn, each did say that they are respectively the Mayor and Clerk of the City of Eagan, the municipality named in the foregoing instrument, and that the seal affixed on behalf of said municipality by authority of its City Council and said Mayor and Clerk acknowledged said instrument to be the free act and deed of said municipality. Notary Public STATE OF ) )ss. COUNTY OF _) On this day of , 19_, before me a Notary Public within and for said County, personally appeared and , to me personally known to be the person(s) described in and who executed the foregoing instrument and acknowledged that the executed the same as their free act and deed. Notary Public �C 1 APPROVED AS TO FORM r . l.. �.� .I - __'r►�► mc, I APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: Pew Peiohart Community Devetopmerrt Director Dated .......r..._ THIS INSTRUMENT WAS DRAFTED BY: SEVERSON, WILCOX & SHELDON, PA. 600 Midway National Bank 6uiidIn 7300 Wet 147th Street Apple Vrllley, Minnesota 55124 (612) 432-3136 II - II ;i S' i1 ii 1k 1 von ) n '' • - • 1�Tc7'i l/ 1'l' . l l.l l" --6AESXR/DGE DRIVE- . .r•..'. I •• / ••N . r--- i 1 )11 BLOCK I :�.. � ' . r I 1 t, I N 1 lil I. - 1 I i > . 1 i�i - -----_ —Z I.r — — -- ----- Y-- --- 1 -- 41 ••• '• f :_.('7 1.•A1.0 A .1 .!'1.1'ti'T-.l 'i'.�.'1'1 �i!`.li' A 1'.:.a;. 1 11'..$ 1.'.I! • -- a� _I;t_—__-- cn,., 1. Cl)� ' _ .■ liw l mm t, 1 C CO il i 'lI 1 el- (r ( It ill 11 11 e 1 i Ii i ii 1 , !�iI 1 �I il I I II e,I 11 ' 'tII I L� i i ( I'l! lt ill` (III i 1 �� � ' I I I I I11I1101 .1 O •it e I iI sl I � I !; z1 it I i ( 1 s , l` ji . II ( I. I !I I 11 ��I I t I i I I 1 .1 I ji'l i ( ' '1 a LI lifi;t ' '1 I 1, I � l I I 11 Ir i iflj1 ;i ! I . I i ` I 1 1 ., I I ,!j I� I I li el 1 ! I I, 1 I !] ;1 i i ri l' lit I !t I 1 fl I e It III ,I I 1 I t! fl . i1 , , 1 II1,'j i , t 1 I I n r,' 1 11 I1 l I i E f� 1 �!! 111 111111* 11 1• I' ( I; `f f 1_1 ' I! I' I 1,1 11 . I r 1 � ! —---— ! ya0I ---- • Q1 \\1• OwN •0% `JM.! es.: _--_- �- ice' 4 -, �.` �� �14G`'-- �M -sue»e• - css i L_1 ..v `�;\ ■ �\ ~ •- i- A•�- +• • .•- .1/..- . . . ......— ','— __EL.,. ▪ `,` ``p{oa CRESTRIDGE DRIVE , ��� ther.Wm •� �! 1 fi Ll .!i . , r-vu__ Baas 1 7pfM(7 ,,>� �► 1 ♦ (pjY.wa 77 ,MLL �wLl �.1 , ` Yaw j `, ♦ rn[Kroy�tY �T—_ �a atssis—}ss l4sssss saV �_ \ ♦'` ♦` tr EIMfWtatwa %. G eulsaa *„.�)).r Y• I `♦ ` `Ww ) Wee I _/ei i Op.VS3• arltwR--- /--=.---♦ ..� Icy yfoU 1 ♦♦ \\ ,`♦. _ _ 1 ' 1 W ,.ICI • � MH3RIT�ONIA I 1 L I . ♦♦♦♦ ♦♦ \ • .,., Nasa• + ■ a. Y ♦ _V \ d/t' (• I Yf'I 1 �`� \� \ `, ! 11YY ♦1(VENDY'S .a`_�` __Y•_ I I a ! L▪ ,` . \ `` 1n .s. 7 • Os SO FF �f It ! I aas•5 . ,\ .\ \ `` , 1 ` I 1 =�u1 MI a jl 4 :W.' f w a .e.n ♦ - �` Y \ . , • ♦` r ` ar.1) uua]o.r Tr i 't ! 1•`` ``b\\ `. `. ` ,` f sell t! 1 nl - •/ -an ',;.�.71G I 'I }t }W�a\ . . 11 i▪ `�. '` \ �. \ ` w�T • t 1' (1 1 i / i I I # 1 \ \ 'a \• ` \ \ EMI w , _M= T i 1 CC co • • 1 i \ • • ` •1 . ogee. .. I �' 1 f I I 1 , •� \\\`� `\`. \ \ `` `` 171 ' t�• .♦ Wit• i I 1 1 `• �� . rn a 1I ew 1 n I• /I r I it�`'V„. \\ ` ‘,\‘‘‘ , a j , `\ • `\ `\ ..J1;',a• I 1 +ia f/ 1 L T e.■Ia`s'{� \ ` • Vii' °�\ .\\ �` • `\ ♦ 1 I+t Z I i- »y)aa• 11 ``.�` \ `� , `\ \• `\� `•`. \\ ` •• M ,, .. r• MIS 114 I H Illr+ I' I i %I 0 ` ”. 1\Y♦'' \ • \ % \ . ( ` t•arrum�x�+thaw/DIM. 11 p f I \ ' \' Ii , \\ ` •� ` ` sV ♦\ Od(C D.C.UFC✓J[S+3i Syyr 11 ti \, `s♦s \\ •)T;1 I` •`` \ Y Y .. -• •.\ Ce "M#MM` ..." 1ai� i 71)11 I j 1 Nee) ♦ • esj` \�`[5{45V.t \ I- I 0•e,y LE \ \ !!" , , '••‘,4 s%•,\\ '• \ ‘, ‘, •trrT •• k• •• ‘‘f ilkilk \ 1 , 1 I ,f `, . . \ I \ r i/i, t! %t' ° `,, . ,\ ` t I 1 1 ♦ ‘• \ `, % ( I 7 1 •{ ` :.510 1 t I 1 - `` ` \ \ • • f ' 1 ,1, 1 1 \\ , Ns ii \ % c t ``♦ ..,.."; • \` ♦ 1 ♦ C. Y.n • %, \pia♦ a `♦/♦ g7a a 1. f 1••• \ r %, • t 11AD 7 1 •t...wM..ao.a L.E..1112113 LAKE ` \�'a �..1r5 ` • . . \ .`▪ ` . 1 I 1NAlERELEVATION 12 07 92 ,,,s \ ‘.•...,♦` ♦ s• -• . , , 1 1 • ♦ I . I \ N, r `` 1 t I 1 1 ♦ • • • 1 1 1 �` A�� !) t1 - C —.i_ 1T EXHIBIT 1Cn • i< >I 4eS:e' 4.t .. It, • ~ '''C' O�C F s =t a .• s Rte"_ __ `` It _—_—_ 7 10" -- -----7 ,----; __ -7_7-7 a il .-- - - ;- ir•Egg - _ _ ---7----_::7--..-7 .• __ .T._ _- .- - - - -a IIODFS11i11.4 ! .. OLD FASHIONED • WP100 a HAmBuRGERs - :_._ , __ . . . • _____ M 5•-2" Y I MSR p =7 ARSE woOLD > - 8E ) 4to" VRIOGING TYAL SIGtJ k E I G HT To" �'7 011 a FOUNDATION REQUIREMENTS: Concrete Base-4'-0"D1a_a S'-0"Deep. (Foundation specifications subject to local soil conditions and code require- . -7 'Dents.)Direct burial installation. • ci EXHIBIT C" • Ilima.f■ -06–, _ _ _.__....,....:;.:: ___,_:_: ...._.2:': VAS Y I.....I...5...33.4.-/—h1i5N,V/.t.3 A- 0,i%:t1 i polYA773 O3.I i:I t!t0 I I 11;ill-gt:11) li hil li • ii Hi ____,.... 4 • .. lit iti „ hi • _ ,_. I ,ii id.. Li i •• t! ik • . ; . , i ••ii i f — ..—." I.); I, k , , . .0 i ..rt. --..,..._ u'• '.'f.' i/!: • - - i Al il , • - ( ni :• \ : -‘,.. _.,) I II 1 i , i ■• 1 •t, ,1 ,? -e-.7".. ■ I ' 1 il \ 1 - —ij 6. 11 I ' ' -..'" \ .:. ' .1 II t• i , I i 11 • r. ,1 i $.11 11 '‘ . , f . ■1 . %. i ;i L., ,.. ,- , i 1,i-, 1 I = . .1 'l '1- -. 1 gt•ll ' , , ._=-.• !, 1 1 1, _.— 1 . Ill t ! ■ 1 I t , \ ; i I; • . ,I 41 . ; ; • • , , .. . 1 I). It • , • , , . In 1 . . i ---7 . 1 ti 1 k 1, / II Emmiii 1 ... : j ..,:,,-,., ; I ., , ,..._ „ I 1 1 • 11 —.•. ,44-,--_-;- Of • 1 \ 1 ,,, ... ... ..... . ill I i, I, \ i! V 1 ' r • 0:. c. . , . ,. , :, „it • , - . 1!.;i \ 1\ I, . . 7,--_,„_,7::I i e Ai, ,. I. , 13 ' I 3 ex I; WI 3.41 ■I li ii 101 • I 11 i; 111:1 ii!! 1 iill 011 VI ., I I _;.________(1 , .__ ._ 1•Is li., t . , P !, li ,, " -_-...z._::-,f, , ti . . . ...ijf : • ' 1 ; I ..,..___. . •_ .—..., _-::i . : . ... . . ' ' l' \N .-L-- t 1111111-1 If.;;HIl / .1 = - -- '11 I li • 11114171 I; ii .... _- •;:i-' ri;;, ;1.:H '' I li ' I 1') 11!. _ • : — , , , lussami 't II 11:1 . ._ _ i ,. .. i, \ •__ _ .. ; \ hi,, ,, — ' J — -44--■ ..i ,. .•• • III f . -- Itit ..N.,.... 11'.1 ! I il Il 1'1 - . •-••-•-.. ' g 1•114, I {! 1 \11 ;1 I /, ,... ..: it ;1,,•1; " I I 1 ..I • - . . . . 1 / '. v 1..i.'''• 1 . 'I!i V, 1 ; 1 . 9 • -- .. • j . 1 .. li.7:!. I; • I il \ \ . 1 ,i , li tt ti %; • •11..11 ' II_ k 11! ,., ; ,•1, ti' .' . $ ' • 1 ' 1 ''''' '.' : * ! .•1 / ; I! .: 7 '.1 L. 3.....„ 1 1; , _ •.- - --- 1, i 0 Li . „.. • .l 11 • II ..._ ...... ... . Agenda Information Memo September 21, 1993, City Council Meeting RECEIVE FINAL ASSMT ROLL/SCHEDULE PUBLIC HEARING O. Project 639,Receive Final Assessment Roll/Schedule Public Hearing (Aldrin Drive- Streets & Utilities)--The installation of public streets and utilities within Aldrin Drive has been completed, final costs tabulated and the final assessment roll prepared. This roll is being presented to the City Council for their consideration of scheduling a public hearing to formally present the final costs and assessments to the affected property owners. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To receive the final assessment roll for Project 639 (Aldrin Drive - Streets & Utilities) and schedule a public hearing to be held on October 19, 1993. RECEIVE FINAL ASSMT ROLL/SCHEDULE PUBLIC HEARING P. Project 609, Receive Final Assessment Roll/Schedule Public Hearing (Cliff Road & Rahncliff Road - Streets & Utilities)--The installation of public streets and utilities within Cliff Road & Rahncliff Road has been completed, final costs tabulated and the final assessment roll prepared. This roll is being presented to the City Council for their consideration of scheduling a public hearing to formally present the final costs and assessments to the affected property owners. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To receive the final assessment roll for Project 609 (Cliff Road & Rahncliff Road - Streets & Utilities) and schedule a public hearing to be held on October 19, 1993. RECEIVE FINAL ASSMT ROLL/SCHEDULE PUBLIC HEARING Q. Project 641, Receive Final Assessment Roll/Schedule Public Hearing (Wenzel Addition - Streets & Utilities)--The installation of public streets and utilities within Wenzel Addition has been completed, final costs tabulated and the final assessment roll prepared. This roll is being presented to the City Council for their consideration of scheduling a public hearing to formally present the final costs and assessments to the affected property owners. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To receive the final assessment roll for Project 641 (Wenzel Addition - Streets & Utilities) and schedule a public hearing to be held on October 19, 1993. s3 Agenda Information Memo September 21, 1993, City Council Meeting ACKNOWLEDGE COMPLETION/AUTHORIZE CITY MAINTENANCE R. Contract 93-C,Acknowledge Completion/Authorize City Maintenance (Park Center 3rd Addition - Storm Sewer)--Public storm sewer facilities installed privately by the developer of the Park Center 3rd Addition, under Contract 93-C, have been completed according to the authorized plans and specifications, final inspections have been performed by representatives of the Public Works Department, and the improvements have been found to be in order for favorable Council action of acknowledging and authorizing perpetual City maintenance according to warranty provisions of the development agreement. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To acknowledge completion of Contract 93-C (Park Center 3rd Addition - Storm Sewer) and authorize perpetual City maintenance subject to appropriate warranty provisions. VACATION/RECEIVE PETITION/SCHEDULE PUBLIC HEARING (BIRCH ST & TRAILS END RD) S. Vacate Public Right-of-Way,Receive Petition/Schedule Public Hearing (Birch Street & Trails End Road)--The City has received a petition requesting the vacation of Birch Street and the southern portion of Trails End Road to accommodate the proposed platting of the Woodlands 4th Addition. All application materials have been submitted, reviewed by staff and found to be in order for Council consideration of scheduling a public hearing to formally present and discuss this petitioned request. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To receive the petition to vacate public right-of-way (Birch Street & Trails End Road) and schedule a public hearing to be held on October 19, 1993. Agenda Information Memo September 21, 1993 City Council Meeting PUBLIC E INGS FINAL ASSESSMENT HEARING/DELINQUENT UTILITY BILLS A. Final Assessment Hearing, Delinquent Utility Bills--A public hearing is scheduled for the September 21, 1993 City Council meeting to receive input from affected property owners regarding the assessment of delinquent utility bills. The assessment roll consists of the parcels as listed on pages 56, through . ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To close the public hearing and to approve the final assessment roll and authorize its certification to the county for collection. CLOSED ACCOUNTS 101230003003 131028011 6.20 101352001001 234025061 146.09 101370007001 234032072 84.45 101375010004 128398094 7.46 101417507006 244606022 8.73 101430103001 234206072 42.24 101499013001 250013062 90.41 101499209001 250043006 21.04 101499305002 250136086 44.54 101499307002 250141011 12.24 101499308001 250138065 97.33 101499323001 250075013 460.51 101499709001 371220092 31.10 101499713002 371199062 13.44 101500301001 119005031 50.67 101550007004 367046091 10.50 101660203001 126082045 32.35 101670332008 101074071 79.42 101670417006 235114054 40.54 101670910001 241006045 11.61 101671104002 237121022 23.75 101680002201 234095012 143.32 101690102001 234059053 41.50 101710402102 113085176 190.68 101715002003 121052011 11.55 101740006201 126227005 28.36 101740016900 126184017 64.97 101740019400 126155061 14.60 101740306201 126327253 95.86 101740506201 126330612 72.18 101827517004 375041072 15.29 101830003001 363115045 19.83 102560003004 130225041 30.61 102560004003 130239082 32.49 103295101004 239172062 79.85 103295102004 239173053 27.54 104490012101 361036041 9.89 104506008005 370152031 43.30 104506011005 370149091 48.86 104507702002 377177092 19.40 104725213002 111247083 55.89 104728501001 234106081 445.33 105210001005 122216021 279.75 105380109201 121330052 33.06 105621006001 122032041 39.54 105880009001 362323041 17.33 106398301005 128107014 34.99 106398303004 128103053 47.32 106398401015 128156016 34.60 106398404003 128201062 40.83 106398404008 128187042 98.74 106579502001 116211091 6.71 106590521002 248321071 125.35 107250012002 371093032 21.66 107250012004 371160011 32.31 107250012005 371163081 11.84 107250040004 371116061 125.05 107585201003 120220001 15.29 107585202003 120219031 10.75 107585203003 120218041 13.90 107587514005 380070013 17.09 107587807001 380119041 7.95 107587812001 380114092 35.30 107587816001 380110031 6.82 107595009003 125057073 20.36 107595112002 125082061 29.07 107595120002 125090062 9.86 107640007001 111207061 161.98 107710001016 240081043 50.52 108195012002 120100053 47.09 108195013003 120145022 11.75 108446011001 243339081 48.99 108447609001 369062041 6.82 108460205003 111045027 106.76 108460216002 111073074 65.68 108460230002 111055094 25.88 4,446.86 OPEN ACCOUNTS SEWER AND WATER 100090002006 362060010 186.73 100130001005 370085050 238.04 101170007001 235020080 77.53 101660201102 126114064 37.56 101671101101 237140090 269.35 101671101201 237141080 380.20 101671102001 237139020 183.04 101740016700 126182030 97.15 101740201105 126318000 337.74 101830009105 363070070 145.78 102275038003 129075070 46.15 104465138001 364320030 147.54 104775008003 365086040 577.02 104805003204 117153150 287.87 104810005000 362181050 230.87 105380105002 121352080 46.24 106398104006 128039040 46.15 106398301008 128124000 311.01 106920010000 126441000 198.48 10759501000,3 125058065 205.36 107650304012 243115080 229.11 108460021003 105065090 46.15 108460226003 111020010 84.07 4,409.14 S7 STREET LIGHTS 105540006001 363065610 17.45 105880002002 362334010 17.33 105880002003 362338070 17.33 105880003003 362339060 17.33 105880008001 362322050 17.33 105880010001 362324030 17.33 105880012001 362326010 17.33 105880016001 362330050 17.33 105880017001 362331040 17.33 106399504001 362311080 17.33 106399506001 362309020 17.33 106585013001 120019050 15.29 107585201001 120221090 15.29 107587523004 380020020 10.97 107587821001 380105000 7.04 107587822001 380104010 7.04 108195003005 120140070 15.29 108195003005 120141060 15.29 108195005006 120178020 7.04 108195008005 120130090 15.29 108195008005 120131080 15.29 108195009005 120128030 15.29 108195009005 120129020 15.29 108361215001 370055010 34.88 108361216001 370056000 23.93 108361217001 370057090 34.88 108361218001 370058080 34.88 108361219001 370059070 34.88 108361220001 370060040 34.88 108361221001 370061030 34.88 108361222001 370062020 34.88 108361223001 370063010 34.88 108361224001 370064000 34.88 108427505002 108335070 15.29 108427509002 108331010 15.29 108427516002 108324000 15.29 108427524002 108316000 15.29 744.17 STORM DRAINAGE 100020005025 355031010 36.69 100100006030 355014020 36.69 100120003002 355057000 7.37 100140001301 355098010 7.37 100170001053 255003070 32.99 100190001151 255005050 32.99 100250001052 155159010 7.37 100250001476 155089060 7.37 100260001051 155067020 32.45 100260001053 155065040 32.45 100260003077 155057040 7.37 100270001201 155098050 7.37 100340002076 155048060 32.45 100360001051 155082030 32.45 100360001082 155139060 32.45 100360001281 155090030 32.45 100360006027 155163050 32.45 100380003002 355050070 34.82 100380007002 355051060 7.37 100380008002 355049010 36.69 100390002004 155127000 32.45 102090004003 155086090 12.87 103985001001 155093000 32.45 104870001200 355066090 34.90 105360001002 155115040 32.45 105360002002 155114050 7.37 108370003403 355095040 8.06 108425019001 155037090 7.37 657.53 Agenda Information Memo September 21, 1993, City Council Meeting FINAL ASSMT HEARING (OAK CLIFF 6TH ADDN) B. Final Assessment Hearing,Project 627 (Oak Cliff 6th Addition-Streets&Utilities)-- On August 17, the City Council received the final assessment roll for the above-referenced project and scheduled a public hearing to be held on September 21. Enclosed on page is a summary tabulation of the amended assessment roll showing the final assessment rates as compared to those estimated in the feasibility report presented at the public hearing held on April 9, 1992. All notices were published in the legal newspaper and sent to all affected property owners informing them of the final assessment hearing and the proposed final assessments. In response to those notices, staff received an objection from the developer of the Oak Cliff 6th Addition pertaining to the quantities of roadway improvement from Cliff Road that was used for calculating the street related assessments. After reviewing this issue with the developer, the staff amended the assessment roll to be in conformance with a Resolution prepared by the Dakota County Board of Commissioners as part of a lawsuit providing an entrance from Cliff Road (County Road 32) to Oak Cliff 6th Addition. A final meeting is scheduled for 11:00 a.m., on Monday, September 20, to further address concerns by this developer. The final assessments against this development are less than the estimate contained in the feasibility report. Subsequent to that public hearing, the developer entered into a development ajgreement with the City waiving his right to object to the assessments. Enclosed on page -3-are excerpts from that development contract pertaining to this issue. Also, enclosed on page (p,?j is a written objection submitted from Dakota Electric Association pertaining to the assessments against the electrical substation located on the northwest corner of Cliff Road and Cinnamon Ridge Trail. The staff will be available to provide an update regarding these objections and address any other questions that may arise during the public hearing process. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To close the public hearing and approve the amended final assessment roll for Project 627 (Oak Cliff 6th Addition - Streets & Utilities) and authorize its certification to Dakota County. FINAL ASSESSMENT HEARING PROJECT NUMBER: PROJ. 627 ASSESSMENT HEARING DATE: SEPTEMBER 21, 1993 SUBDIVISION/AREA: OAK CLIFF 6TH ADDITION PUBLIC HEARING DATE: APRIL 9, 1992 IMPROVEMENTS INSTALLED AND/OR ASSESSED: F.R. - Feasibility Report FINAL F.R. FINAL F.R. SANITARY SEVER RATES BATES ;TOR/ SEVER RATES RATES ❑ Trunk ® Trunk $.104/sq. ft. $12,039.22/L.S. $ 9,890.00/L.S. © Laterals $2,909.70/Ac. $3,546.00/Acre E Laterals $11,575.28/Ac. $12,418.00/Ac. 190.58/cfs 274.00/cfs ❑ Service ❑ Let. Benefit/ Trunk ❑ Lat. Benefit/ Trunk WATER STREETS ❑Trunk ❑ Gravel Base $ 9,137.62/L.S. $ 6,800.00/L.S. Q Laterals $2,796.84/Ac. $3,596.00/Ac. L^ ! Surfacing 46.65/F.F. 39.93/F.F. ❑ Service ❑ Res . Equiv. ❑Lat . Benefit/ ❑ Multi Equiv. Trunk ❑ C/I Equiv. ❑WAC 0 Trail SERVICES STREET LIGHTS ❑ Water & San. Sewer © Installation $ 747.53/Ac. $ 537.00/Ac. ❑ Energy Charge CONTRACT * OF INTEREST AMOUNT CITY NO. PARCELS TERMS BATE ASSESSED PIRANCED 92-05 $198,740.55 (12.25) 31-21 7 10 Yrs . 6.5 % $208.102.00 F.R. -0- F.R. COMMENTS: AMENDED SEPTEMBER 9, 1993 5. City Improvements. The City shall install the following local improvements: utility and street improvements under City of Eagan Public Improvement Project No. 627. Said improvements shall be assessed against the benefited property in accordance with Minnesota Statutes S429 . The Developer and Owner waive objection to any and all defects in the proceedings for the ordering in of the improvement, the awarding of the contracts for the improvements and the assessment of the cost of said improvements levied by the City pursuant to the Minnesota Statutes S429, including change orders necessary for the completing of the improvements. However, the Developer or Owner may file an objection to the award of the Contract referenced herein provided such objection is made in writing between the time of the opening of the bids for the installation of said improvements and prior to Eagan City Council approval thereof. If Developer objection is received, the Eagan City Council shall have the option of readvertising the bids, continuing with the improvement or deleting the improvement from the contract. If any improvements as referenced in paragraph 5, "City Improvements" are deleted, they shall become the responsibility of the Developer as defined in Paragraph 6, "Developer Improvements" . The Developer and Owner hereby waive hearing and notice of any and all hearings necessary for the installation of said improvements or improvements installed due to the default of the Developer as provided herein. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, we have hereunto set our hands and seals. CITY OF EAGAN DEVELOPER: s.�O 4^ VERNON R. COLON d/b/a CEDAR. CLIFF fANAGEMEN DATED: • .0 - ... . .-. AllaL �= j , . . M/12-/ l �� n By: Vernon R. Colon Date Its: Mayor T} AIM • ILA Y R :L„ELECTRIC . ckl..,/ A T / O N September 14 , 1993 The Eagan City Council 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55121 RE: Parcel Number 10-03000-010-52 Assessment Dakota Electric Association, the owner of the above referenced property, is by this letter objecting to the special assessment of $8 , 443 . 65 being considered under project number 627 . We do not believe our property benefited by this amount for the following reasons: 1. The property was already served by a paved road. 2 . The widening of the road caused Dakota Electric to reconstruct the entry and parking area for employee safety. 3 . We believe the special assessment of $8, 443 . 65 represents approximately 20% of the market value of the property. Thank you for your consideration of this matter. Sincerely, -1157Cik.. 75 Ed Brunkhorst Right-of-Way Engineer EB:rl A Consumer-Owned. Nonprofit Electric Utility 4300 220th Street West/Farmington, Minnesota 55024- 9583 Telephone: (612)463-7134/ 1-800-874-3409/FAX: (612) 4 -6256 An Equal Opportunity Employer (.00/ Agenda Information Memo September 21, 1993, City Council Meeting FINAL ASSESSMENT HEARING (LONE OAK RD & EAGANDALE BLVD) C. Final Assessment Hearing, Project 631 (Lone Oak Road & Eagandale Boulevard - Streets, Utilities & Signals)--On August 17, the final assessment roll for the above- referenced project was presented to the City Council and a public hearing was scheduled for September 21 to formally present and discuss the final costs and assessments associated with this project. This project provided for the widening and upgrading of Lone Oak Road (County Road 26)from Burnside Avenue to Eagandale Boulevard along with the installation of utility services to adjacent properties, sidewalks and signalization of the intersection of Eagandale Boulevard. Enclosed on page ( ,', is a summary tabulation of the final assessment roll comparing the final rates with those estimated in the feasibility report presented at the public hearing held on May 20, 1992. This final assessment roll has been reviewed with interested affected property owners. Enclosed on pages (4,(2 and Ct is a memo summarizing those discussions. Subsequently, staff is recommending that the assessment roll be amended to reflect the lower density zoning classification of Parcel 010-27 in Section 10 resulting in a reduction of the proposed assessment from $18,125.62 to $12,138.59 which is approximately $1,200 less than the estimate contained in the feasibility report. In addition, an error was discovered in the calculation of the assessable frontage for the Eagandale LeMay Lake Apartment Complex resulting in a reduction of assessments from $9,124.92 to $7,410.75 which is $73 more than the estimate contained in the feasibility report. Information regarding these corrections have been forwarded to the affected property owners. It is not known whether they will continue their objection or not. The staff will be available to address these and any other questions that may arise during the final assessment public hearing. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To close the public hearing and approve the final assessment roll for Project 631 (Lone Oak Road/Eagandale Boulevard - Streets, Utilities & Signals) and authorize its certification to Dakota County. Le FINAL ASSESSMENT HEARING FROJECT NUMBER: Proj . 631 ASSESS/1En SEALING DATE: September 21. 1993 SUEDIVISION/AREA: Lone Oak Road/ Eagandale PUBLIC REARING DATE: Nay 20, 1992 Boulevard IlXFROVEMERTS INSTALLED AND/OR ASSESSED: E.L. Feasibility Report • FINAL F.R. FINAL F.R. SANITARY SEVER RATES RATES $TORN SEVER RATES RATES 0 Trunk ❑ Trunk Laterals ® Laterals $12a4.5a i s_ $ q67_00 I _s_ [' Service ❑ Lat. Benefit/ Trunk ❑ Let. Benefit/ Trunk WATER STREETS ❑Trunk ❑ Gravel Base © Laterals $$_514.43 L.S. $4,300.00 L.S. ❑ Surfacing Service (1) ® Res . Equiv. $ 33.18/ff ❑ Lat . Benefit/ (1) ® Mtrlti Equiv. $36.15:/ff $35.B11/4 Trunk (1) © C/I Equiv. $37.14,/ff $ 37.02/ff ❑WAC ❑ Trail SERVICES STREET LIGHTS ❑ Water b San. Sewer ❑ Installation ❑ Energy Charge CONTRACT * OF INTEREST AMOUNT CITY NO. DLRCELS TERMS RATE /1SSESSED County jIPANCED $ 20,753.92 $243,554.62 26-18 _ 3 10 Yrs . 6.5 % S ?9 nai_nn F a COMER TS: (1) The rate is comprised of street drainage, concrete curb and gutter and overlay improvements. • Amended September 1, 1993 - Additional street light cost Amended September 10, 1993 - Property Classification #10-01000-010-27 Amended September 16, 1993 - Frontage (.10 � MEMO —city ea of an 9 TO: FILE - PROJECT 631 FROM: MICHAEL P. FOERTSCH, ASSISTANT CITY ENGINEER DATE: SEPTEMBER 17, 1993 SUBJECT: PROJECT 631, FINAL ASSESSMENTS LONE OAK ROAD/EAGANDALE BOULEVARD On Tuesday, September 7, 1993, Mike Foertsch and Gerry Wobschall met with the property owner for parcel #010-27 located in the northwest 1/4 of Section 10 (Easton) regarding the proposed assessments to their property. The feasibility report for the project and subsequently the final assessment roll for the project identified the Easton's parcel to be assessed for an 8" water lateral stub as well as a portion of the cost of the street construction for Lone Oak Road based on a D-4 Comp Guide classification for the property. The amount identified for the water lateral stub was $8,529.97 and the amount identified for a portion of the Lone Oak street reconstruction cost was $9,595.65. The total of these two numbers equals $18,125.62 as compared with the feasibility report estimate of $13,317.00. In reviewing this information, the Easton's questioned why their property was being charged for an R-4 residential zoning classified property when their existing zoning is agricultural. Staff explained that assessments for lateral improvements are proposed based on the highest and best use of the property. In this case, the assumption was made that the highest and best use of the property was based on a D-4 land use guide plan classification. The Easton's questioned the rationale behind the City charging them for the water service stub which was provided to their property at this time when they currently are utilizing a • well and have no future plans for connection to the City's water system. Staff explained that the final assessment roll was compiled based on current special assessment policy which was identified in the preliminary assessment roll included in the feasibility report as a part of the presentation at the public hearing for the project. The Easton's questioned whether the cost for the water lateral as identified in the final assessment roll couldn't be levied as a future connection charge when in fact they do connect to the water system. Staff explained to the Easton's that they could not make changes to the current special assessment policy as adopted by the City Council, but that the Eastons could request City Council consideration of a future connection charge for the water lateral cost versus the levying of the water lateral charge as a final assessment cost at this time. Page Two September 17, 1993 At the meeting, the Easton's questioned the water level of the pond on their property. At the time of this memo, staff had not had the opportunity to go out and field verify the existing water elevations on the pond. As a result of the meeting with the Eastons, staff further reviewed the land use guide plan classification for their property. In reviewing the current land use guide plan dated March, 1993, the comp guide plan designation for the Easton's property is D-2 versus the D-4 assumption which was made in the preparation of the feasibility report as well as the final assessment roll which was previously presented to the City Council. As a result, the final assessment roll which was initially prepared by staff and presented to the City Council for consideration of scheduling the final assessment hearing date on September 21, 1993 has been revised to reflect the changes in the land use for the Easton's property. This revised assessment roll is being presented to the City Council for their consideration at the hearing on September 21. I, ira .g g"� Mich el P. oertsch MPF/je (cr7 Agenda Information Memo September 21, 1993, City Council Meeting VACATION (CAROL STREET) D. Vacate Public Right-of-Way, Carol Street (S1/2, Section 36)--On August 17, the Council received a petition from the developer (Arcon Development, Inc.) of the proposed Waterview Addition residential development requesting the vacation of the Carol Street public right-of-way as platted within the Dodd View Addition connecting Dodd Road with TH 3 south of Fitz Lake in the S; section of 36. Enclosed on page (2 9s is a legal description and graphic showing the public right-of-way requested to be vacated. Enclosed on pages 70 and 7/ is a letter from the applicant justifying the request for this petition. This public right-of-way vacation is requested to accommodate the proposed 21-lot residential subdivision of the proposed Waterview Addition which is being considered by the Advisory Planning Commission on September 28. Enclosed on page -7 .is a copy of the preliminary plat showing the relationship of Carol Street. Notices have been published in the legal newspaper and sent to all potentially affected property owners informing them of this public hearing. The staff has received an objection from the owner of Lot 2, Doddview Addition, relating to the creation of landlocked property (Outlot B, Doddview Addition) that would result from this vacation. Outlot B has been further subdivided into three parcels (031-04, 032-04 and 033-04) as shown by the vacation sketch. Parcel 033-04 is owned by Lot 2 who has expressed the concern regarding landlock. Parcel 032-04, adjacent to Carol Street, is owned by the owner of Lot 4 and 031-04. No comments have been received to date from this property owner. Enclosed on page 73 is a potential scenario of subdividing Outlot B and C of the Doddview Addition eliminating the need for Carol Street as a public right-of-way. However, until that subdivision occurs, the issue of creating landlocked parcels needs to be addressed with this vacation request. The owner of Lot 2 has indicated that if an agreement could be reached whereby Outlot B retained right of public access to Dodd Road, their objection would be greatly minimized. Because of the legal complexities associated with this vacation,potential future development requirements and need to maintain public access to prevent landlocked parcels, staff is recommending that the public hearing be closed and the vacation request denied or continued to be considered simultaneous with the final plat of the proposed Waterview Addition. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To close the public hearing and deny/continue the vacation of Carol Street for consideration with the final plat of the proposed Waterview Addition. . ROBE - . constICTING C4G1NE�RS, ': ENGINEERING PLANNERS and IRHO SURVEYORS COMPANY, INC. „MOD EAST 146Th STREET, BURKEY1L== , 611NNE:OTA 55237 PH 43c-3CDO -1••"• ./ Certificate of Survey • Legal Description : PARCEL TO BE VACATED All that part of Carol Street as platted within DODD VIEW ADDITION, Dakota County, Minnesota, according to the recorded plat thereof, which lies easterly of the easterly right of way of Dodd Road and that part of Carol Street which lies westerly of the westerly right of way of State Trunk Highway No. 3. Containing 1 .21 acres more or less. I LOT i - EXCEPTION BLOCK / OUTLOT A AREA TO BE VACATED . ...............CAROL STREET:::.:: / S' I 4' O LOT t `%,,At\ :.S3P 1 I v3?-opt OUTLOT B o if/ LOT 2 0 33-0 9' V OUTLOT C , LOT 3 O U4 CO``Q* -NOTE: SHADED AREA DENOTES LOT 4 031-04 • THE AREA PROPOSED TO BE VACATED _ NAL� Sr. I hereby certify that this is a true and :arrest representation of a tract of land as shown and described heron, As prepared by me on this 11111 day of 010-)605r ,19 - . ,/),A,-IfirsIn //6-11-416-- Minn, Reg. Ho. ct MtJ -,ow" ,46,,,,,„- �7.,..,� ,a ARCON DEVELOPMENT, INC. .„..„;os`.co I DEVELOPERS - PLANNERS - CONTRACTORS PHONE 612/835-4981 • FAX 612/835-0069 • 7625 METRO BLVD. • SUITE 140 • EDINA, MINNESOTA 55439 August 11, 1993 To: City of Eagan From: Scott Johnson, President Arcon Development, Inc. Item: Petition To Vacate Carol Street Right Of Way in conjunction with Waterview Preliminary Plat Arcon Development, Inc. requests the vacation of the Carol Street Right of Way on the south border of the Clarence Fitz property (to be platted as the Waterview residential development). I believe this vacation is appropriate and desirable for both the City and the adjoining land owners for the following reasons: 1. Vacating Carol Street will eliminate a double-frontage condition that would result from the development of the Fitz property due to insufficient distance between Fitz Lake to the north and Carol Street R.O.W. to the south. 2. The parcels to the south of the Carol Street R.O.W. have few owners, with common ownership situated so that a cul-de-sac constructed north from the existing Hall Street R.O.W. would more efficiently serve this area (see Exhibit). 3. If Carol Street is not vacated, the Fitz property may have to obtain access through a newly constructed Carol Street. The adjoining property owners would have to share in the cost of the construction of utilities and street for this access. 4. Vacating Carol Street eliminates Lot 1, Block 1 and Lot 1, Block 2, Dodd View Addition from becoming corner lots, avoiding resultant loss of value to these lots from traffic concerns and significant street and utility assessments. AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER (-1b The vacation of Carol Street will benefit all adjoining land owners and allow for efficient access and orderly development for each of these properties. The Carol Street Right of Way was dedicated as part of an older plat that is no longer efficient or desirable. Thank you. Sincerely, Scofdohnson President Arcon Development, Inc. • ); I r114 am 11H- :!y I . 1 :s : isi : f n II ! 1!1 ! i ri !'.11 '2.11 0 P .3 I •• i 5 4 ; I : * 2* • t - - .., ..: 1 , -s Asi,, 44. r:: ;!:-..11:),,1,1„ ! . • • !it••11 1-rE1 1-- 0 thli• 'Li . Op!!! 1.;1:, :I i;tif,:ifiiiiii V I '' 7C• U 1 z ( i; ::1: j' i-iVi 1: 1'4 1'1 . ‘ . I . i • 1 1 2 I I! 1 i!';I: 19pl!t-i: .i, w22 . -.i! •-• !! il!lit! i!!:;! _ -0 ,,..ii,; t .•..illt - - • 4 1 - 3 1 i ti ! 1,t1;.; i 144'-'•;;:;i!..il - 9:: 2-c-: g , ; :.. 2 4 § 5 § , ! ; ii II. !!!'it: li;% 4 i' ilieAlti!::11.11 _ it li w:•:.; ii !, II±iikt.; !-111 1 !.1 ,111:1;1,-;PV2 i g.tyl‘Vii a .—I.— ■__'- - .. .:i I. : iiiiiiIIIS ° =., li I:",' !.1).;.1 .. r .11-irt 4 " 1 g* '-' .ii j" ;;ii;;Ir '!"•1 311-1 J;:.21 fWi;;_i t••■ 6 .., . ,....... , i„ , 0 ii...•1 z,,,,, .1 1.g.i:::,..,..r.F.:, - _._ . i i 1 ti i n:!.ri! j:!. !rt I e 5 's l' Wi'': 4!.7 1 'El ..:).si;,s: .0 ) 11 T‘,1:23-= ti III !--:! i'-,io-'_i';i N. i I.:I I J "---.,:•'-.. , 21 ni fili:11:!!;,I:11 7 4.7.1 11 ., _ • • I 1 :1,2 4,..,,, i ,;•!..;: 1 •-, • "N.. 4.;•• ,i; Irv:. 3 1 IN / b... ..i ,,j, ' / s „ ...`-• 1 i a „ 1 ,/ . ; ? • I 1. QV '■. 4.44. 4 '4.1 44,4 4. e01.4.4) -----_ , 3, i x > "••■ - 0 _, ---•-- • ,..., Z . uj .: -.: '.--- ..___ :, _ _____ .:. ‘I.1 X < <: C"\ ,, 1.. . II. / - • g .! •::::::. . ______________-- /...... a ; - i.::••••`= i 4/, i / .,.;t.::....::".... .. t I - i - . 44:::::* e• . /:.:.:. g :; r t 1 1 1 0 2 7 I • .• E At 2.. .. /::::::- 11 1 • I - . :•:-:-: .• - _ _ I i I ! ! ■ I ___ 22• ale ..) . " • . r. III 111 /::::::' ._, •, . I • •••• i I ! il i t ti.:• :. 2.) ,-- i I I ] •: • - "- - : • i- :t. - E::: . , :. 1- (__, 11 ... ; . t:•:.: .. . . a (-_,-N „, .Al■::s .•.•. . I -- -'---- , -- . . .- <7 i • !..- ' f:•:.. I- - Is ! 4 . : _ i , • t:t:- 1 i . ..z.o . i - 2 ' . 2 : ,-• - _. , ..., ..., , •.; ,I . '.i ...,... .: t'a en .... . l',1 : •• ' .!:: I 1 IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIj' I 2,.•/ 3 1 3- 0 t /1 f:;:: : ...,.... a t•:-:). J r, ! : 11144/1111:),•• ..- ! •:•:•: 2- 1 1 •i- 1::.:.:: _ ” : I t _____ i.I <•• - AI, .•.-. •• •• 0 L-1 I I ,.. • . . ' ' f . - - ......„ ,-, _ , .. : 5 I 1. .\ t 1 . • I,••• ... ..2 L._• ' • e 1 :. :: 0 I Z-.1... L -- :-. , . . z t• -- 1....,... ..: _ ...., - _ r., ..J -------- --.-,____ _____ •---, 'b0"■ .*:'... _ _J _ < ■••• 2 away w ---. • • 0 OVi -- • . . tz Z aulim !'"7 :•-':' ....".'A ra 1 :1-.•-n..-.! • AT1G—J2-33 THU 4.11 :21 ARCON DEVELOPMENT INC FAX NO. 6128350069 P. 02 ,i. 4 : i ./IR 0 4 0 '1 - 41:---- 030-?$ ' 'gyp► •q 1 ` • ti 17! ,_•,... , .I, .__.1 J 1111K .-■;:'; it i 41111‘ '�.._ OOCit• is j tr r•` X c' :. : "'"' NNE O.••• . N WO. . lair V . ■ OM 04 Alk:us A • 'CO LANE o it '� f 1 , . I ' /0,, LoTic z triK .,. !not .........._. ,. / / . r • -. 4 7. av • ::lir • ~Hi 01 _c ::' / 010'78 FULL STREET rr 'og I ! _ . • J2) h' l`I 14 ot.o FOR DISCUSSION ONLY `1!-'THIS DRAWING SUOMS A POSSIBLE STREET LOCATION TOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY AND IN WO WAY IMPLIES OR .COARANTEES THIS CONFIGU' OULD BE APPROVED OR CONSTRUCTED. ...1•..I. .. ...;ut(7 ''' t , . ... - J r l c ac svgs 4=ag• "._F ROAD _ — ---1�; o,��,, �i ►� I�0 4 # C3on79�• !� ..n• Agenda Information Memo September 21, 1993 City Council Meeting ................................................... ................................................... ................................................... PRELIMINARY PLAT/WILSON ADDITION A. Extension,Preliminary Plat,Wilson Addition, Located along the west side of Blackhawk Road in the East 1/2 of Sec. 17--During August, 1992, the City Council approved the Wilson Addition consisting of four (4) lots and 4.6 previously zoned R-1 acres along the west side of Blackhawk Road, south of the Blue Cross property. The City has received a preliminary plat extension requesting that the Wilson Addition plat be extended for a period of one (1) year. It is recommended that the plat extension be granted through September, 1994, if an extension is to be considered by the City Council. For additional information on the item, refer to a copy of memos from the City Planner and Director of Public Works; a request by Brad Swenson onalf of the owners of the Wilson Addition and the original report enclosed on pageT7 through q (. The Finance Department has researched the Wilson Addition and, based upon the study, the financial obligations collected in the past and the uses proposed for the property, it is the City staff's recommendation that the Wilson Addition preliminary plat extension include a financial obligation for storm sewer trunk in the amount of $7,376. For a copy of that financial obligation, refer to pagesq -throughc?3 . ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny a preliminary plat extension for Wilson Addition with the condition for a financial obligation as presented. ri MEMO ,„ city of eagan TO: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR REICHERT FROM: CITY PLANNER STURM DATE: SEPTEMBER 15, 1993 SUBJECT: WILSON ADDITION In August 1992 the City Council approved the Wilson Addition consisting of four lots on 4.6 previously-zoned R-1 acres along the west side of Blackhawk Road south of the Blue Cross property. The City has received a Preliminary Plat extension and this request was reviewed at the in-house development meeting on August 30. Last year the Council eliminated proposed Condition #8 dealing with the requirement to execute a waiver of hearing/objection to the costs associated with the 1994 upgrading of Blackhawk Road. This condition is again being added for Council consideration and Director of Public Works Colbert is following up with a separate memo on this issue. Also, some expiration date should be added as a condition (typically plat extensions are for one-year periods). Attached are copies of the applicant's letter, August 4, 1992 City Council minutes, and the staff report. If you would like additional information, please contact me. City Planner JS/js attach. 1-1 ( MEMO __city of eagan TO: MAYOR & CITY COUNCIL C/O THOMAS L HEDGES, CITY ADMINISTRATOR FROM: THOMAS A COLBERT, DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS DATE: SEPTEMBER 17, 1993 SUBJECT: EXTENSION OF PRELIMINARY PLAT - WILSON ADDITION CONSIDERATION OF ADDITIONAL CONDITION OF APPROVAL On August 4, 1992, the City Council considered a preliminary plat for the 4-lot residential subdivision of the Wilson Addition fronting on the west side of Blackhawk Road just north of the Blue Cross Road intersection. In reviewing and processing that subdivision application, the Public Works Department identified the schedule of upgrading Blackhawk Road in 1994 as a part of the City's approved 5-year CIP. Subsequently, the following condition was suggested for inclusion: The development is required to execute a Waiver of Hearing/Objection to the cost of improvements associated with the future (1994) upgrade of Blackhawk Road. The applicant/developer (Mary Ann Wilson) objected to that condition. Although the Planning Commission included that condition in its recommendation to the City Council, it was deleted by Council action with the preliminary plat approval on August 4, 1992. The Public Works Department would like to have the City Council again consider the merits of including this condition. With the approval of the plat and the sale and development of the single-family lots, experience has shown that new property owners do not take into consideration the proposed future assessments associated with the 5- year CIP and are financially strained with a lot purchase and new home construction. Subsequently, there are strenuous objections and potential for assessment appeals resulting from a scheduled and much needed public improvement. In addition, Subd. Code 13.30, Subd. 15.b.3 and Subd. 4 states that "... design standards are to be followed unless the Council shall permit a variance because of unusual circumstances due to the topography, placement of buildings or other factors making it reasonable to vary the standards set forth ...". The Public Works Department is proceeding with the schedule of proposing to upgrade Blackhawk Road to City standards with concrete curb and gutter from TH 13 south past this development during 1994. I will be available to provide additional information and discussion as necessary. Respectfully submitted,/4/44/114__ or .Director of Public Works TAC/jj cc: Peggy Reichert, Director of Community Development Jim Sturm, City Planner Mike Foertsch, Assistant City Engineer 2 Ms. Marilyn Wucherpenning City of Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan,Mn 55123 Re: Wilson Addition Dear Marilyn: I would like to request an extension for preliminary plat for Wilson Addition. We would like to bring on the parcel when the ajacent property is developed to better faciliate planning for utilities to service the property. Please contact me should you have any questions regarding this request. Very truly yours, TRI LAND SURVEYING 1.> Lei Bradley J. Swenson cc: Mary Ann Wilson f � 1 iL is Page 9/EAGAN CITY COUNCIL MINUTES August 4, 1992 5. The final plat shall provide a 20'wide easement along the common lot line in between Lots 1 and 2 to provide for the storm sewer run-off from the cul-de-sac to Highway 55. Aye: 5 Nay: 0 COMPREHENSIVE GUIDE PLAN AMENDMENT/PRELIMINARY PLAT WILSON ADDITION Mayor Egan introduced this item as a preliminary plat for the Wilson Addition/Mary Ann Wilson, consisting of four lots on approximately 4.6 previously-zoned,R-1 (Single Family) acres located along the west side of Blackhawk Road in the East 1/2 of Section 17. City Administrator Hedges said the application had been reviewed by the Advisory Planning Commission at their July 28 meeting and they had recommended approval. Director of Community Development Runkle desaibed the application and its location. Mary Ann Wilson, the applicant read a letter of object:on to Condition #8 of the preliminary plat approval. In answer to a question, Director of Public Works Colbert said the condition is one that has been imposed in the past with assessments being prepaid or paid without ohjection at the time of assessment. Some members of the Council indicated they were uncomfortable with the condition and indicated they would not support it. McCrea moved,Awada seconded,a motion to approve a comprehensive guide plan amendment for the Wilson Addition/Mary Ann Wilson of approximately 4.6 D-III(Mixed Residential)Acres to D-I(Single-Family). Aye: 5 Nay: 0 McCrea moved, Awada seconded, a motion to approve a prelim++nary plat consisting of four lots on previously zoned R-1 (Single Family) property located along the west side of Blackhawk Road and subject to all conditions except Condition #8: 1. These standard conditions of plat approval as adopted by Council action on July 10, 1990, shall be complied with: Al, B1, B2, B3, Cl, C2, D1, El, Fl, G1, and H1 2. Tree protection during site grading shall include enclosing trees to be saved with snow fencing or other suitable material. 3. A 40' half right-of-way shall be dedicated for Blackhawk Road. 4. Individual driveway trunarounds hall be consturcted for each of the three newly created lots. 5. All required permanent and temporary construction easements for the sanitary sewer shall be dedicated on the plat or acquired by deed conveyance prior to final plat approval. 6. The driveway connections at Blackhawk Road will require culverts to convey the drainage along the ditch system of Blackhawk Road. 7. This development shall extend sanitary sewer to all four lots. Aye: 4 Nay: 1 (Wachter) Director of Public Works Colbert asked • -- - r of bearing/objection'condition should be required for cimitar developments in the future and Councilmember Awada indicated that it should be included and the Council would decide whether or not it was appropriate on a case by case basis. • SUBJECT: COMPREHENSIVE GUIDE PLAN AMENDMENT & PRELIMINARY PLAT (WILSON ADDITION) APPLICANT: MARY ANN WILSON LOCATION: NE QUARTER SECTION 17 EXISTING ZONING: R-1 (SINGLE FAMILY) DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: JULY 28, 1992 DATE OF REPORT: JULY 7, 1992 COMPILED BY: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT APPLICATION SUMMARY: Separate applications have been submitted requesting a Comprehensive Land Use Guide Plan Amendment of approximately 4.6 D-III (Mixed Residential, 6-12 units/acre) acres to D-I (Single Family, 0-3 units/acre) and a Preliminary Plat consisting of four single family lots. The site is currently zoned R-1 (Single Family) and is located south and west of the Blackhawk Road and Blue Cross Road intersection. BACKGROUND: The existing home was built in 1947. On November 6, 1985, the City Council approved a Waiver of Plat splitting the property into two parcels. The Waiver was requested to allow the Wilsons to sell the house on the approximately two-acre Parcel A. A condition of the waiver required platting of the approximately 2.5 acre Parcel B before any further development could occur. To insure the platting of the property, a $10,000 deposit in favor of the City was required as a condition of the waiver approval. The applicant is drawing against this deposit for the current application and escrow expenses. EXISTING CONDITIONS: The site is relatively flat and treeless on the northern one-third, however the southern two-thirds contains moderate to severe slopes and significant tree growth. COMMENTS: The City Code requires an 85' minimum lot width at the building setback line and a minimum lot size of 12,000 sq. ft. in R-1 districts. The four proposed lots are all larger than one-half acre. The lots range in size from 28,875 sq. ft. to 86,000 sq. ft. All lots exceed lot width and area requirements. Access to all lots will be from Blackhawk Road. Due to the existing vegetation and range in grades, the applicant is proposing no site grading at this time. Individual lot preparation will be done by custom builders. Tree preservation should be achieved with a physical barrier. Protection of trees to be saved during site preparation should be enclosed with snow fencing or other suitable materials. PARKS & RECREATION: Parks & Recreation staff will be recommending a cash parks and cash trails dedication for the three undeveloped lots to the Advisory Parks, Recreation, and Natural Resources Commission at its August 6, 1992 meeting. The lot with the existing structure will be exempt from both parks and trails dedication. GRADING/DRAINAGE/EROSION CONTROL: There is no grading proposed other than that required to construct the houses on the three new lots. The houses are proposed to be situated on the north edge of the wooded area, so the trees in the backyards will not be disturbed. The existing drainage pattern of this four-lot subdivision is for the front yards to drain to the ditch system along Blackhawk Road which drains westerly to Highway 13. The backyard areas drain in a southerly direction to Pond AP-27 or to Robin Lane. The surface drainage for the new houses should continue in the existing patterns to minimize the grading. The driveway connections at Blackhawk Road will require culverts to convey the drainage along the ditch system of Blackhawk Road. The house construction will be responsible for erosion control measures. WATER QUALITY: On-site ponding for a development of this size and type is undesirable. In addition, runoff from the proposed development will not discharge directly to a recreational class waterbody. Therefore, staff will recommend that the development be subject to a cash dedication to meet water quality requirements. The amount of the cash dedication is estimated at $1,036. This recommendation is subject to approval by the Parks, Recreation, and Natural Resources Commission. UTILITIES Sanitary sewer of sufficient size, depth and capacity is readily available from an existing 9" line that runs across the east lot line of the adjacent lot to the east of the Wilson Addition. The developer proposes to extend the sanitary sewer to the four lots of the Wilson Addition by connecting to the existing 9" line at Blackhawk Road and Crest Ridge Lane. The proposed sanitary sewer would be extended along the south side of Blackhawk Road and the line would be approximately 25 feet deep at the Blue Cross Road intersection. Sanitary sewer service would also be stubbed to the existing house on Lot 1 which is currently served by a private septic system. Water main of sufficient size, pressure and capacity is provided along Blackhawk Road through the existing 12" trunk water main. Individual water services will be provided to each of the three newly created lots from this trunk water main. The house on Lot 1 is already hooked-up to the City's water system. The construction of the three water services for Lots 2, 3 and 4 will require the removal and replacement of the street section of Blackhawk Road since the existing 12" water main is located 10' south of the centerline. STREETS: Access to this proposed development will be obtained from Blackhawk Road, which is presently a substandard 24' wide bituminous surfaced road with gravel shoulders. Blackhawk Road is identified for upgrading in 1994 as a part of the City's 5-Year Capital Improvement Program. Blackhawk Road is a designated Community Collector street in the City's Comprehensive Guide Plan. However, due to the existing elevations, curvature of the road and present (1989 A.D.T = 4,742)/future (projected A.D.T. = 7,100) traffic volumes, there is limited visibility creating safety concerns for individual driveway access onto Blackhawk Road. Therefore, each newly created lot shall be required to construct its driveway with a turnaround to eliminate the need for backing out onto Blackhawk Road. EASEMENTS/RIGHTS-OF-WAY/PERMITS: A 40'half right-of-way shall be dedicated for Blackhawk Road. In addition, sufficient easements shall be dedicated along Blackhawk Road for the installation of the sanitary sewer line. If detailed construction plans indicate the need for permanent or temporary construction easements from the adjacent property to the east, it shall be this development's responsibility to acquire all permanent and temporary utility easements prior to final plat approval. Permits will have to be obtained from the City of Eagan for construction within the Blackhawk Road right-of-way required by the installation of the individual water services. Permits will have to also be obtained from the MPCA and MWCC for the proposed sanitary sewer lateral extension. Detailed plans and specifications prepared by a registered engineer shall be submitted for review and approval by staff prior to final plat approval. FINANCIAL OBLIGATION - Wilson Addition Based upon the study of the financial obligations collected in the past and the uses proposed for the property, the following charges are proposed. The charges are computed using the City's existing fee schedule and connections proposed to be made to the City's utility system based on the submitted plans. Improvement Use Rate Quantity Amount Storm Sewer Trunk S.F. .069/S.F. 103,884 S.F. 71 CONDITIONS FOR WILSON ADDITION: 1. These standard conditions of plat approval as adopted by Council action on July 10, 1990 shall be complied with: Al, Bi, B2, B3, Cl, C2, D1, El, Fl, G1, and H1 2. Tree protection during site grading shall include enclosing trees to be saved with snow fencing or other suitable material. 3. A 40' half right-of-way shall be dedicated for Blackhawk Road. 4. Individual driveway turnarounds shall be constructed for each of the three newly created lots. 5. All required permanent and temporary construction easements for the sanitary sewer shall be dedicated on the plat or acquired by deed conveyance prior to final plat approval. 6. The driveway connections at Blackhawk Road will require culverts to convey the drainage along the ditch system of Blackhawk Road. 7. This development shall extend sanitary sewer to all four lots. 8. The development is required to execute a waiver of hearing/objection to the costs for improvements associated with the future (1994) upgrade of Blackhawk Road. 3 STANDARD CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL A. Financial Obligations 1 . This development shall accept its additional financial obligations as defined in the staff 's report in accordance with the final plat dimensions and the rates in effect at the time of final plat approval . B. casements and Rights-of-Way 1. This development shall dedicate 10' drainage and utility easements centered over all common lot lines and adjacent to private property or public right-of-way. 2 . This development shall dedicate, provide, or financially guarantee the acquisition costs of additional drainage, pending, and utility easements as required by the alignment, depth, and storage capacity of all required public utilities and streets located beyond the boundaries of this plat or outside of dedicated public right-of-way as necessary to service this development or accommodate it. 3 . This development shall dedicate all public right-of-way and temporary slope easements for ultimate development of adjacent roadways as required by the appropriate jurisdictional agency. 4 . This development shall dedicate adequate drainage and pending easements to incorporate the required high water elevation necessitated by City storm water storage volume requirements. C. Plans and Specifications 1 . All public streets and utilities necessary to provide service to this development shall be designed by a registered professional engineer in accordance with City codes, engineering standards, guidelines and policies. 2 . A detailed grading, drainage, erosion, and sediment control plan must be prepared in accordance with current City standards prior to final plat approval. 3 . This development shall insure that all temporary dead end public streets shall have a cul-de-sac constructed in accordance with City engineering standards. 1511 STANDARD CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL PAGE TWO 4 . A detailed landscape plan shall be submitted on the proposed grading plan. The financial guarantee shall be included in the Development Contract and not be released until one year after the date of installation. 5 . All internal public and private streets shall be constructed within the required right-of-way in accordance with City Code and engineering standards. D. public Improvements 1 . If any public improvements are to be installed under a City contract, the appropriate project must be approved at a formal public hearing by Council action prior to final plat approval . t. Permits 1 . This development shall be responsible for the acquisition of all regulatory agency permits in the time frame required by the affected agency. F. Parks and Trails Dedication 1 . This development shall fulfill its parks dedication requirements as recommended by the Advisory Parks and Recreation Commission and approved by Council action. G . water Ouality Dedication 1 . This development shall be responsible for providing a cash dedication in addition to/in lieu of ponding regJirements in accordance with the criteria identified in the City 's water Quality Management Plan. • E. Other 1. All standard platting and zoning conditions shall be adhered to unless specifically granted a variance by Council action. Advisory Planniag Commission City Council Approved: August 25, 1987 September 15, 1987 Revised: July 10, 1990 p1ataprv. con LTS #2 FC/- -- ; j 1 4� . / _ � 1 / `''� WATER �j TR£ATM£NT / .f EAC/L/TY - NWj NE V/ NM Wz ,O .. 7 Cl) q/N ?. HILL / �AC2/T' c ,o 11 L. l'13 LOCATION r�� _� •� °::,7D.� o M SW E o� •u.E B-. I Ar -- fir-, ,, f),.•t at.. .1. 1.0 p, y UR K --.14.. ..: [)►r7v7- ( 9'- .ltlY� � : j .x.: e. Y � •4' %-:' - - .-.- 'Yls.-i-F4 i.,t.k -' VAr:,..- _;-,::=••, Al.- /:.k4..‘1•>4407 •&- ' ,,..- ,,,/ ,v--,,- •, f, f_® _f _ may. 4 it `+.sue• ZONING „is -{ �.- r` ._. ;, -,.aa. .. . KJiE& �"�'` ..-.: �� ON > r R'3 �� yaw .*4f //, ea N ± - Imo H , .._a:' c. -- ro.a�_R.. r^r s'1`-1. :?..fit ». /-.. 2:::..— y -S.d '' _ �J�.f� I7,1. ' �.' R ~ s - �" t c GUIDE PLAN ,�__. i D-I .•-.....!,.. , .c... ild.1111111 D•m 1d8 n 0.$r •�; 0 i., >:y 4 m mi, I (DIL:licig 1 � .-.j..--^�^ . . Y_ i , . • I N O — r 11.1 11!1 WI! Wag ..=. 2 I I ail: I a Wog i71/4 11 1 y & ,;, g : i�`- = hi ►- - i ....r.k i l -'4 . 8 1 I r . s, p —_1-1- _ 2 eIaF. 1 I = 0 1 -11-1 r� =iwa I ---.... i s--•{ a � p4�y Z as {12:i i W S . J . V • a 11 OM 1 8 i�� � g .F.iiiiia : a °it O Z o. oy \ boy �� . " JJ I- el � - 4 , \ -0 1 IJt a 0 / N� 0 p 11•,11?01 a® / ti F, I t,='III iijiil Q / . i� ..... .„-c,,F4. 1 1 f Q / 9 / � y "- S a Jiil 114Jj'111' fi, _1; 11 ■ Si.. .•••„....... I li 11 • Z / 11100101.11 J;'� t ' 1 ' °off :i S jl jj ' 1 m r it j•lli aJ11'l O r s 1 i# •IlliJ'111 J l /a.;, / , Jji 41141111j' /I I its.i, Q I `.�1 0 .�r Z I ii �`�� U I .\ ' Q I s a e , 1l..211.��qIt I I I r t i1:ij r''J'j 1 11J ll ;i;, • IJ:Il;1l1� , 1 101,�Jlli '� 0,-`. 0 r JJ1+1 `"1 i� �'t,e•�, ) I 1 I li 4 J'l 11 p 1 t -- •t I1. 1 yr -I J' sill I {{� Ii • — N C . Z a• W r e. .4.11 8 Z J °ci R • Q 0 Cr e4a �' .r 2 „ . t 7 o . 1° s • • • v •• • -v J Z Z •'• • 00 a_ Y-.� ■ • O < C) X •• _,- • l2 t.--- - w { ® .. - - _ . /W .6y ` - 'O^ Z 0 -- T"� .. „ T. , . : . %VApp t..• I' / e s•. s"::: _- " Cr ' ' X / ...-'% ". ' ' '''..• . . 4b 0 Ct . ; . . ■ ....• 7 ....,e Z. 1 / / I / j Q Y ; 1 I I / I I . Q U '` I i t ii 0,.. l i •CC Q _ / 11 I I / o I I V I , ,an I / co `- I,•, / �� i ' ' ' = I `.` / ,i,/ 1 // I I Cy l // , • r .00 te. ♦ -. , / I / . • ! / // N / ' / / I m 0 al o ill; r di 1 11 W s 3 , � .. il • W Qom\ 3 O' a • • u. , z 1 2 # . —1-�_ : t 3 { 1 1;s --�1— St !tie Z 0 "; :O 4 O y 2 m N – —� wli ■ i„�' ../ . $ ' 1 Y9 sss sr LA e S t x w = . y t •t l ? •N• • t G_ w cE . .. ` 9CC = 1 ' = o L ; r ce � III i � , EN ' r � Z •�? a ,,�., • • a 4 s • I- •� 4 �: O i �. �.� } ) i i ! i . I F.. Y • a . a ' s s : • ; i2 ri/ • r Ctil • • ili : oo . ,; ".\ .pp ` • i \ , 47). ! ,.%‘ 1 ,\\ ! \\ 1.4' i3 I `\ \\ \\m\4. 1 r / `. l i II lv ! 03• Q !t:/ j 01 I 2 • M 1 3 69'.• 1 Oo 10i. . 1 3 ti ! r .'°.\ . • \`f • I d 11 I 0 li • Y Z P u., .cr ! w. 1 i; J je II! in CD • 1 i tM 0 l _i i l _ Z t C ^t' m a I Is93 4 0 IL ..77 r 4; I y r J7 �a 1.1 VP .s s i i . i . r i • . .. I = 1 . el, I ' •.. i 4 17 I . 1 E I ■ • ; & I • t Z . • • . • ■ ,.•. > i t 1- Y • • . • ' • : i ■ ■ • il0 i Q .. ' • • i y. • , O 0 z. , • • .�' • iii ...II \ • �Q r . Iron • ti,: '°' • `:: y' �• •�• CIA Jr . I J .�: • ;. :�1-•� �• i�� f • :<!i•: F . , t r may.• •,..:. .,.. •f. ..::: ::;;.y.:: . 0 ......................: s + it�, '�'� a. C b vex ^�-,c4`c't' . ,,4,' 7 NI AL �, 0.0 •„ -- -!- ���� Cq SER •�\- :, 802.E %' �_ /% a V NO. I 6 0 82 3. ;� _ - -- �4 ,.' \ 769.4 i� •.oi + 829.‘1 ''SX, .../ _I �j i P 826. _ •_ le,i . ,� � j 629. VOS ••I -__..�-' a / INDUSTRIAL eA ��� �. CP-6 1 A-b ■'),, „„ofer- 806.0 2,0,// .a ►, yt,. • '� 12-- ����` tee. ,L - —. 18 - - - . "-/ A ''' ,,( I I 4a1F•;1 D.----617/1E\Fri!,\"/- - - \ ' / �__ 1/ 0A � / A-bbb - tL'77..c,,, ,,6z,._:_r_. 1_1-t-k A. \ ---' X‘ , t DITION \.4' ' ...T__Li _ ,L AP-38 �•— 4—f∎RDF1 800,0 t zar7t4 IT i � Ni A-kk A-n 839.8 g� ..—�AR&84 ;¢� / ~i A__M B4/.4 -c _ / ii;I LVf: ! 112 �� � C3\� ., ) \ ,, . �' \ Tff L. i-i j:N. �-rvi GAN ME 11316C2, ____/N7�� �' ' , �4 mm --- SiL� I APES; + T } r.,_ r. •y �q o tA987VEi_ ,, �•iR C• ,-ri. c<�i-,�1..aDDJ L3 � �\--;,,,,_ p 0 ki IA � �A .� - a ; BLACKH■ ` ...7.....- `� ° ` i � ARt33, `:'� �■ rra ��1 - PARK � . a vi��.' !DE 803.6 1� 'i1' r �....„ ,_ �✓ -,6 4 , 1�1� 1�.� Ti!%t4> -7 \, , ) A N SUBJECT PARCEL WILSON ADDITION FIG. # i City of eagan ' - approved: standard �• PUBLIC STORM SEWER plate # : _ == WORKS q I. r)a=DADTP,ACNIT MASTER PLAN FINANCIAL OBLIGATION - WILSON ADDITION: Based upon the study of the financial obligations collected in the past and the uses proposed for the property, the following charges are proposed. The charges are computed using the City's existing fee schedule and connections proposed to be made to the City's utility system based on the submitted plans. Improvement Use Rate Quantity Amount Storm Sewer Trunk S.F. .071/S.F. 103,884 S.F. $7,376 C171 Sg c 1; I. fl) i fll co 4 i !I E g o= W O-1 LL ' 1 j! ; lr R it _11_; c3 '`i! , I :-I I II !IH 4 Q W p I Z j 1 Z S. o ei II!1 O -: i LL II a 4 .1{ 2 C` ' i`ILF a Ns III I cA I ' s � ` � w i ' � ill Z • O . F a F ��. r• • • 1 i i • 1 ° M a w K O • c Z ' 'Q J /c'' // \Y` `' s ' \ a / ` .r 1� � // < ` `\\ H \\ i Z i t O I` / `\ �`� :>' .q//' . : -I I3r .:::..:•.:...:.. �.t. ix I ?� !' ' 10 I 1 i s II l t. i :.^,• (T3) . . Agenda Information Memo September 21, 1993 City Council Meeting PRELIMINARY PLAT/VARIANCES TOWN CENTRE 100 - 12TH ADDITION/MANN THEATERS B. Preliminary Plat, Town Centre 100 - 12th Addition/Mann Theaters Inc., consisting of approximately 6.7 previously zoned CSC (Community Shopping Center) acres within the Eagan Heights Commercial Park Planned Development,Conditional Use Permit for a pylon sign and a Variance for parking requirements located along the south side of Yankee Doodle Road, east of Yankee Place in the NE 1/4 of Sec. 15--At its meeting July 27, 1993, the Advisory Planning Commission considered the above-referenced application for a preliminary plat for the Mann Theater proposal located in the Town Centre 100 subdivision. The City Council heard this item at its meetings of August 17 and September 7, 1993 and continued it on both occasions with direction to staff and the applicant to provide additional information with respect to outstanding issues. Following Council direction at the meeting of September 7, the principal remaining issues appear to be 1) parking ratio, 2) pedestrian access and 3) wetland and woodland preservation. Staff has met with the applicant's representatives on two occasions since September 7. Revised submittals based on the Council's direction were provided and information relative to those submittals is enclosed. Enclosed on page - is a memorandum from the City Administrator arding the pr cess undertaken on this development to date. Also enclosed on pages 7&through /((f is a supplemental staff memorandum providing background, a description of the proposal, identification of the issues resolved, discussion and analysis of the remaining issues, analysis of alternative solutions to those issues and proposed conditions of approval if the remaining issues may be resolved. By way of background information, enclosed on pages 1. fi through the is the original Community Development Department staff report relative to this item. Also enclosed on pages(6((, through ' are the Advisory Planning Commission minutes. The APC had reconimencied denial of.e application as it was presented at that time. Also enclosed on pageaj hrough,=203s a memorandum covering the recommendations of the Advisory Parks„ Recreation and Natural Resources Commission from its meeting of August 5. Finally, enclosed on pages pagesWehroughZOgis a copy of correspondence from Blue Cross/ Blue Shield of Minnesota, owners of the Waterview Office Tower, covering a petition signed by their employees relative to this application. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny 1) a preliminary plat for Town Centre 100 - 12th Addition/Mann Theaters consisting of approximately 6.7 previously zoned CSC (Community Shopping Center) acres within the Eagan Heights Commercial Planned Development, 2) a variance of one foot to the 10' parking stall width for the theater use and 3) a variance from the City's 1:3 parking ratio for theater uses for property located along the south side of Yankee Doodle Road, east of Yankee Place in the NE 1/4 of Section 15 as presented. 1 C- 1 MEMO _city ea of an 9 TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCILMEMBERS FROM: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES DATE: SEPTEMBER 15, 1993 SUBJECT: MANN THEATER PROPOSAL At the September 7 City Council meeting, the Mann Theater proposal was continued until the September 21 City Council meeting, allowing City staff and representatives of the developer (both Federal Land Company and Mann Theaters) to meet and further review issues that have been raised by the City Council, developer and City staff pertaining to the proposed development. The staff has continued its meeting with the developer's representatives in two additional work sessions since the last City Council meeting. It should be noted that a number of issues have been jointly resolved while others remain. I commend the City staff for their ongoing attempts to facilitate a resolution to all the development issues raised during the past several weeks regarding this proposal. Not unlike other development proposals--case in point, the Kings Wood 3rd Addition considered at the last City Council meeting--there is typically a need to address some deviation to City policy. In the enclosed report, staff has specifically outlined those issues that have been resolved and those that remain as a public policy matter. To assist the reader, they have identified first the issue, then the various alternatives and last, a simple risk analysis for each of the alternatives. Hopefully, the report provides enough information on each of the remaining policy matters to allow the City Council and the developer to generate a dialogue for a decision on this project. If any member of the City Council desires additional information or has questions about materials as presented, please contact the City Administrator's office prior to the meeting on Tuesday. Also for your information, the City Administrator has had discussions with representatives of Blue Cross regarding their concerns as a neighbor, with Jim Greupner representing the Mann Theater group, and with Martin Colon for Federal Land Company in an effort to address the various policy issues and suggest a format to discuss differences and their resolution. City Administrator V TLH/jeh cr M E M O R A N D U M TO: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES FROM: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT DATE: SEPTEMBER 16, 1993 SUBJECT: TOWN CENTRE 100 - 12TH ADDITION/MANN THEATER Background The applications for preliminary plat, conditional use permit and parking variances for Town Centre 100 - 12th Addition for the Mann Theater proposal were received in June and reviewed by staff for consideration at the Advisory Planning Commission meeting of July 27, :1993 and the Advisory Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission meeting of August 5, 1993 . Staff met with the applicant on Monday, June 28 as a part of the standard application review process. The variances to City Code and City policies were identified and alternative solutions were discussed to minimize or eliminate those concerns. The applicant submitted revised plans the following Friday. The majority of the substantive concerns raised in the original site plan remained. The City staff and the applicants had numerous discussions in an attempt to creatively resolve these issues and identify win-win alternatives, but were unable to identify solutions acceptable to the applicant without variances. Since staff is legally prohibited from approving variances to the standards established by the City Code and adopted policies, the background materials and reports which were prepared for the advisory commission meetings identified the variances to code, variances to city standards and policy issues which remained for consideration by the Commissions and City Council . The APC recommended denial of the application as it was presented for the reasons noted in the commission minutes. The APRNRC made recommendations outlined in the staff memo of August 12 , 1993 regarding elimination of pond encroachment and mitigation, tree preservation and sidewalk access. The application was first heard by the City Council at its meeting of August 17, 1993 . The item was then continued to further address the concerns discussed. At the direction of the Council, the City retained the services of Short, Elliot, Hendrickson to prepare alternative site plans and assist in the review of additional materials to be submitted by the applicant. Staff met with the owner, the applicants and/or their representatives on August 24, August 31 and September 2 . The applicant submitted a revised proposal on September 2 which aligned the principal access to the site with Town Centre Drive, but increased the parking ratio. Other issues identified in the staff report and commission reviews remained unchanged. Based upon this submittal, staff prepared a review of the resolved issues and remaining requested variances and outstanding issues for consideration by the City Council at its meeting of September 7. At that meeting, the item was again considered and again continued to address alternative solutions to the unresolved issues. At that time the Council reviewed the outstanding variance and policy issues to identify those which had been resolved to the Council 's satisfaction. Those are outlined below. The principal remaining issues at the conclusion of that meeting appear to be: 1. Parking Ratio - Whether the proposal must meet or approach the minimum 1: 3 on-site parking stall to seat ratio required by the City Code or a variance for a lower ratio and/or off-site parking is acceptable. 2 . Pedestrian Access - If off-site parking is permitted as a part of the proposal or is anticipated as a consequence of site design, whether traffic levels are appropriate and adequate traffic control measures can be implemented to insure safe pedestrian crossings of City streets. 3 . Pond Encroachment, Tree Preservation and Park Like Amenities - Whether the site can sufficiently accommodate the use being proposed in this plat and the uses proposed in concept at the northern end of the site while adequately protecting and enhancing the natural amenities, including the pond, the woodlands and the pedestrian trail system. • Proposal The current proposal consists of an eight screen, 1648 seat theater to be platted on 6. 64 acres. The net site area excluding the pond is 4 . 78 acres. 366 nine foot parking stalls are shown on site for a ratio of 1 stall per 4 .5 seats (50% variance) . Proof of parking is being proposed for an additional 58 stalls at the southeast corner of the site. If constructed, this area would bring the on- site parking total to 424 stalls or 1 stall per 3. 9 seats (30% variance) . A concept plan for the northerly 2. 5 acres anticipates the addition of two restaurants comprising approximately 12 , 000 square feet to be served by 129 ten foot parking stalls. Revised plat, site plan, grading and landscaping submittals together with an area-wide Town Centre plan were received of the applicant on September 14 and are enclosed on pages ( )fl through Lt ( qr- Resolution of Issues The following issues appear to have been resolved either by negotiation with the applicant or by Council direction at the meeting of September 7. 1. Variance to the 10 Foot Parking Stall Width - The Council indicated that as a consequence of the typical two hour frequency of turnover associated with a theater and the unique nature of a theater use as opposed to other commercial uses, a variance may be permitted to allow 9 foot parking stalls for the theater use only. A question was raised at the last Council meeting whether large and small stalls could be interspersed to accommodate different sized vehicles. The City's traffic engineer does not recommend such combinations since drivers will use the most convenient stalls, regardless of size, thus defeating the intended efficiencies of such an approach. 2 . Platting of a Portion of Outlot G, Town Centre 100 1st Addition - The Council indicated that if conditions including the dedication of the additional 15 feet of county road right of way, standard set-backs and a site plan meeting City Code standards were incorporated as an amendment to the Eagan Heights Planned Development Agreement, the Code requirement to plat the entire outlot may be waived. Further, the applicant indicated an intention to cap the total restaurant seating on the northern portion at 350 as a part of the agreement. 3 . Site Access Aligned with Town Centre Drive - The current proposal meets this requirement. 4 . Off-Site Pylon Sign and Pylon Sign Size Variance - The applicant has withdrawn these requests at the present time. The owner anticipates raising these issues again at the time of platting of the northern portion of the P g P site. 5. Variance for Chasing Lights on the Theater Marquee - The applicant has withdrawn this request. 6. Permitting Access to the Northerly Conceptual Uses Through the Theater Parking Lot - If additional uses are permitted on the site, the Council has indicated a willingness to allow shared access through the theater lot. If approved, easements to assure access from the northern lots to a public street be executed and approved by the City Attorney's office for review prior to final plat approval. 7 . Building Materials - The Council has indicated a willingness to permit the use of the proposed precast panel material in lieu of brick as the building finish. Remaining Issues 1. Parking Ratio - As submitted, the proposal identifies 366 on-site parking stalls (1:4.5) and a proof of parking for an additional 58 stalls, providing a maximum on-site potential of 424 stalls (1:3.9) . City Code requires 549 stalls (1: 3) . The applicant indicates that while other cities have similar 1: 3 parking ratios, no theater in the Twin Cities metropolitan area has a ratio less than 1:4 . The most recent theater proposal approved in the region is the United Artists facility in Woodbury which is providing a ratio of 1: 3 .5. The Thomas Lake Centre theater proposal which will come before the APC in September provides a ratio of 1: 3 . General Cinema 's real estate development division provides parking equal to 35% of seats or a ratio of approximately 1: 3 . On behalf of the applicant, Benshoof and Associates has submitted a parking study and traffic control plan which anticipates that, in addition to the proposed on-site parking, 37 to 50 cars per Saturday night will park off- site, necessitating a pedestrian crossing of Town Centre Drive and/or Yankee Place. The study also anticipates 25 to 34 cars to cross park in stalls at the proposed restaurants in the same time period. A cppy of this report is enclosed on pages / J through A general site analysis including parking demand calculations previously submitted to he Council indy Gray of SEH is enclosed on pages /o?/ through �� At the time, estimates of 65-70% theater seating capacity and three persons per vehicle trip were used for peak parking demand calculations. This percentage was based on figures used by the applicant in seeking approval of the same facility in Maple Grove. Since that time, the applicant has reviewed ticket receipts for selected Saturday evening peak attendance at the Maple Grove facility. The Benshoof report indicates that the typical peak occupancy is 40 percent and that the maximum peak occupancy observed in the study period was an average of 49 percent of all seats for the 7 : 00 and 9 : 00 banks of shows. The applicants indicate that they are unable to individually calculate the occupancies of the two banks of shows, but state that in the summer, the occupancies of the two banks are relatively equal. The peak referenced occurred during July of this year. January, June and July are identified by an Urban Land Institute study to by the peak parking accumulation months for theaters. The Benshoof report also suggests a lower occupancy per vehicle at 2 .4 persons per car, an overlap of 75 cars arriving for the second bank of shows and four employee parking stalls. The applicant has not provided the number of employees present at the peak shift, but has indicated that four stalls would be sufficient. Based upon these assumptions, the report suggests that a typical Saturday peak of 40 percent occupancy requires 354 stalls, while the busiest observed Saturday peak requires 424 parking stalls. The risk associated with this calculation is the accuracy of the assumptions and the assumption that the two banks of shows have equal occupancy. If the split were 60-40 or 70-30, different peak calculations would result. Using the same vehicle occupancy, overlap and employee assumptions as in the Benshoof report and a range between the observed occupancy of the Maple Grove theater and the occupancy referenced during that facility's approval, the following parking demands would result: 50% capacity 424 stalls 1: 3 . 9 55% capacity 457 stalls 1: 3 . 6 60% capacity 491 stalls 1: 3 . 4 65% capacity 525 stalls 1: 3 . 1 70% capacity 560 stalls 1:2 .9 Further analysis of the parking demand and pedestrian crossing elements of the Benshoof report is included in the econd SEH emorandum which is enclosed on pages -Z q through -F-�,F-. The issue before the City Council is whether to apply the City standard requiring a 1:3 ratio to insure on-site parking for peak weekend parking demands or permit a variance from Code. If sufficient parking is to be on site, an appropriate ratio must be defined. If not, is sufficient adjacent parking present and available to accommodate the off-site demand? Finally, should the land area proposed for proof of parking be incorporated into the final plat? 2 . Pedestrian Access - If off-site parking is permitted as a part of the proposal or is anticipated as a consequence of site design, the Council indicated the need to determine whether pedestrian crossings of Town Center Drive and Yankee Place could be accommodated safely. Again, the revised site plan depicts pedestrian crossings and traffic signage and controls and the Benshoof report previously referenced provides a discussion of peak parking demands and assumed locational distributions. The adequacy of these measures and conditions related to their implementation ar addressed, n the Engineering memorandum on pages -6 through N:1: The two most likely locations for off-site parking are Town Centre Shoppes where Mr. Colon has offered to provide a cross parking agreement and Metropolitan Bank/Edina Realty which is owned privately. Each of these facilities has approximately 70 parking stalls within the same radius of the theater entrance as the most remote portions of the proposed theater parking lot. The issue before the City Council is to determine whether adequate off-site parking is available and can be secured and to determine the adequacy of the sidewalks and pedestrian crossings of Town Centre Drive and Yankee Place to safely accommodate off-site parking. 3 . Pond Encroachment, Tree Preservation and Park Like Amenities - As a condition of the Eagan Heights Planned Development Agreement, the owner is obligated to design and install a "park like amenity, " which has generally been interpreted to mean the installation of a continuation of the Blue Cross-Blue Shield trail and a sensitivity to the wetland and vegetation in the area. Comments relative to the wetland encroachment and miti atio e included ,i(n! the Water Quality memorandum on pages jL through t7(7t. Comments relative to the tree preservation policy and trailF;lepIties is included in the Parks memorandum on pages /(1,S through lCr? . The intensity of the development of this site as proposed gives rise to the compromises outlined in those reports. Whether the proposed plans and any related mitigation of impacts is adequate in the context of City standards must be determined by the City Council. Analysis of Alternatives The following alternative solutions to the issues above may be considered. The narrative identifies the merits and consequences of each alternative. It should be noted that the alternatives are broader than the proposal submitted by the applicant. They are provided to permit the Council to consider alternative solutions to the remaining issues. 1. Theater Only on Outlot G - As described in the SEH memorandum, the only means of achieving or approaching a 1: 3 parking ratio on-site is to expand the plat to incorporate all of Outlot G. This would allow a minimization of impacts on the wetland and woodland amenities and allow maximum visibility and signage on Yankee Doodle Road. At the present time, the Mann Theater group does not own the remainder of the site and the owner, Mr. Colon, indicates that he cannot achieve a satisfactory level of return by selling it to the Mann's as a part of the theater transaction. This option presents the least risk to the public, except to the extent that a minimum level of informal off-site parking would likely occur. The option also limits the tax base enhancement to the theater improvement itself. 2 . Theater and Proof of Parking on Outlot G - A variation of Alternative 1 would be to require the northern portion of the Outlot G to be set aside as proof of parking for the theater site for a specified period of time. During that time, actual theater parking demand would be analyzed. If at the conclusion of the review period, it is found that the applicant's estimates are correct and a 1:4 or lower ratio is adequate to serve ordinary peak parking demands, the property could be released from the proof of parking restriction and be made available for development. This alternative has the same benefits, liabilities and relative risks as Alternative 1 with the difference being the potential economic benefit of future development of the northern portion assuming the applicant's projections are accurate. If this development occurs, however, its intensity would need to be managed to minimize impacts on the wetland. 3 . Theater and One Restaurant on Outlot G with Proof of Parking Southeast of the Site - Under the revised site plan, 129 parking stalls are identified to support two restaurant uses. The Benshoof report anticipates cross parking in the restaurant lots of 25 to 34 cars on a Saturday night. This reduces the available parking stalls for restaurant use to approximately 100 during busy weekend evenings. This number of stalls may be insufficient to support more than one successful restaurant use. By comparison, Applebee's has 106 stalls approved for its Town Centre location for 181 seats. Chili's has 142 stalls for 217 seats. While both of these restaurants exceed the City's minimum parking ratio, neither has large numbers of spaces available during peak occupancy. Applebee's recently added approximately 20 of the 106 stalls to accommodate actual demand and to eliminate the need for patrons and employees to cross Town Centre Drive. A memorandum concerning restauranking in the City of Burnsville is enclosed on page t C5—)-—1 This alternative has the advantage of permitting the owner to enhance his return on the site by permitting one use in addition to the theater. It has the disadvantage of creating competition for on-site parking thus increasing the need for proof of parking southeast of the site and increasing the likelihood of off-site parking and the attendant pedestrian crossings. 4 . Theater and Two Restaurants on Outlot G with Proof of Parking Southeast of the Site - This is the alternative presented by the applicant in the revised submittals. It anticipates the parking of approximately 62 to 84 cars off-site on a Saturday evening. Up to 46 of these will involve pedestrians crossing Town Centre Drive or Yankee Place. The Benshoof analysis does not anticipate implementation of the proof of parking, but it does rely on the adequacy of the pedestrian crossing facilities and traffic control signage. Due to the intensity of use on the site itself, this alternative appears to present the greatest likelihood of off-site parking and off-site pedestrian movements. If the applicant's parking demand estimates are incorrect, it presents the fewest alternatives for on-site or adjacent mitigation. The owner indicates that this alternative is necessary to provide a sufficient level of return on this site. 5. Requirement of Cross Parking Easements to Approach a 1: 3 Ratio - This alternative may be utilized with any of the alternatives outline above. The applicant has already indicated an intention to provide a cross parking agreement with Town Centre Shoppes. Due to proximity, it is likely that cross parking will also occur at the Metropolitan Bank/Edina Realty location as well. The applicant may augment or minimize the proof of parking necessary if binding agreements can be reached with the adjacent compatible land uses. Uses such as offices and typical retail facilities are compatible for cross parking with a theater due to their different occupancy peaks. Uses such as restaurants or convenience stores are not compatible for that purpose due to similar peak occupancies. If incompatible uses locate within Town Centre Shoppes or if the professional buildings along Town Centre Drive prohibit theater parking, the need for on-site parking is increased. If cross parking is anticipated, it is recommended that the City be a party to the easements or agreements to insure that they remain in force unless and until it is determined that they are not necessary. t-(2) Other alternatives or combinations of these alternatives may be possible. The scenarios simply depict the range of options from the scenario necessary to meet the City Code minimums to the proposal brought forward by the applicant and owner. If you require any additional information, our staff will provide it for you. Conditions If the Council chooses to approve the application under any of the scenarios presented, the following conditions should be attached to any final approval based on the referenced site plans. 1. These standard conditions of plat approval as adopted by Council action on February 2, 1993 shall be complied with: Al, , B2 , , B4 , Cl, C2, , , , ,The landscape Bi plan B3 shall be submitted C4 Dl on E1 a grading Fi G1 plan and H1 at 2. Final Plat application. 3 . All landscaped and green areas shall be irrigated. 4 . Rooftop mechanical equipment shall be screened so as not to be visible from any property line. 5. 9 x 20 foot parking stalls shall be permitted for theater parking. 6. This development shall provide an additional 0. 8 acre feet of wet pond volume in Pond DP-20 in order to meet the water quality treatment obligations of this 6. 6 acre parcel. 7 . The development shall provide a park like amenity including a continuation of the Blue Cross/Blue Shield trail adjacent to Pond DP-20. 8. Where the installation of the trail results in encroachment of the 902 foot contour into the pond, slopes shall be flattened to no more 5: 1, stabilized and revegetated or multiple short retaining walls shall be installed. 9. Areas between the trail and Pond DP-20 shall be seeded with a wet prairie mix and the mow line between the trail and the pond shall be minimized to the greatest extent possible. 10. Existing vegetation adjacent to Pond DP-20 shall be preserved to the maximum extent possible by methods outlined in the City's Tree Preservation Policy. 11. Reforestation adjacent to Pond DP-20 shall incorporate native, lowland vegetation and trees to be visually compatible with the natural vegetation around the undisturbed portions of the pond. 12 . A wetland replacement plan shall be submitted to and approved by staff prior to final plat approval which provides for 1: 1 acreage replacement. 13 . A sidewalk is to be incorporated along the west and south side of the site. 14 . The development will be responsible for maintaining a minimum of 8. 0 acre feet of pond storage volume between the NWL and the HWL in Pond DP-20. 15. The grading plan for this development shall include emergency overland outlets to Pond DP-20 no higher than 15" above the low points on Town Centre Drive. 16. A storm sewer stub shall be provided to serve the 2 . 0 acre residual undeveloped property to the north. 17 . The utility plan shall include a minimum 8" sanitary sewer and 6" watermain stub to the residual undeveloped property to the north. 18 . The existing 36" storm sewer outfall from Town Centre Drive to Pond DP-20 shall be realigned and connected to the parking lot low point outlet approximately 125 ' west of the east property line. 19. No landscaping shall be installed in the boulevard or setback area of Town Centre Drive from the south entrance drive southeasterly to a point in line with the east building line of the movie theater. 20. A Maintenance Agreement shall be prepared and recorded against the property addressing the all-season maintenance requirements of the sidewalks feeding the pedestrian crosswalks and retaining walls adjacent to Pond DP-20 with a foundation elevation less than 904 .0. 21. Pedestrian crosswalks with required identification and advance warning signs shall be installed as directed by the City. 22 . Additional sidewalks to the Town Centre Shoppes and along the west side of Yankee Place from Town Centre Drive to Yankee Doodle Road shall be installed with this development. 23 . An additional 15' of public right-of-way shall be conveyed along Yankee Doodle Road with this plat or the Planned Development Agreement shall be amended to provide for future dedication with subsequent platting. 24 . The Planned Development Agreement shall be amended to prohibit setback variances for the future development of the residual of Outlot G. 25. A restricted access easement shall be conveyed adjacent to Yankee Place from Town Centre Drive to Yankee Doodle Road. 10) 26. An internal access easement shall be dedicated from the Town Centre Drive/Yankee Place intersection to the residual outlot (future restaurant sites) . 27. Cross parking easements shall be required for any off-site parking considered for this development prior to final plat. l �� - -... '''"-' -- - - T■tr..‘*1.tg — ----t,"',5-P--7".:4.14.''''''''''''', /mid adeospuri N) 'NYDV2 at.Lr2H.1 NYDY3 --- _ ....._-... sa2 ToOsSy 7 itauupA < %--- 1' '11/1="11117:1M10171:111/71■0/1/7•71.:I I /Mali 1 . 1 --- •, .1 7 • I•■•- / •;,/o '.7 '7---....7"...':77Z1 7.::-.7'...=--"7".'-'. '..,'::: • • I , --. . , ... ., ........,...,.., ,...,....,,,f,,,,..,... s,,,„,, — - • ._....j___ :"..--&-[ . 1 ....'' .-.'. —..— .. ,- ..... . ... 1, 1 1 WO St I t SIMI 70 WY.. VIM NiANCO Mt 42/11 ..... .. ._. , , _ _....,..---, 1•7•10 ANVI/I I ....-. . .% ;---.• •■■ r' -I • • *1 --r-- ' 1 I I r 1 . ..........._---._ 4 ■ i- ... 4 '% -;:i - _____— r ......_ 4 t ■ t . i , 1 ._i_ / 1 -.._...., ........ . , 1 t , / ,... ,..s.._.,.. --, \ 1 I . I t , t ■ r ( 5 .._ „....._ , • i 1 ! '- . I ' ' , i, A _-,".•. --,\ ! ' t ! ' ' ' -...„\ -;.--e„..„ ; ; i , , ; , Ili/ , E ....,.\ ‘, ,, / •,..••. \N '- .......,......am...., .-, , , _, J , , . .„,, , 01.,)! ) ; -, 1 I i ,---%' . 1i ;-- RI, 1 Tisr.,.,.--...-..6..;,t-i-t-t- - ,--r----- : til i i, % 1\ 1 1 .__ 1 , , ea evil 7 ' t 1.4 &P / L -- ... . . , i ',\ Z1 1 Iffirsourr ____L____ t 4 , : '. 7 \___-7, ti v t, ,: i i — --1— .• : , ,,,, t- __E-__„, : _i- .... — it -.1 \ i,:- __ -- 1 ‘\ 0. 1,1,. t/ ,„. \ • , -, a 1_ ,1_ i , mh - 1 ..... la ___ _ , 1.- ..-1 . .1 ,i / i .0 t .4 --___. _ •?:. , „,- / / ,t• : 1:4 t- ,-- -/.,.. a, • - , , I . ''---- ,i I i i ■ .-. I. ' ' -----'• ' N ,.t I • - _ . ..., 1 ' t ! , in -. . '"., . II .„-11,'":i ! ' . .-..1 Alil . .-1-- ----0 . Ai _ r•-, , , , !,,,--, , /........„ , .___ , , , , , , (,.. „ r„, •-. `':.. ,-. i / \ .1„,..-...— 'I --....-• - .--,- . ' '•■,, , \ \ : _ reS? ... t_.:. -, 1 '', i, ;7., .:-. 1.1%.,,... .\--:- • „..........,_,...._ _._,. .11, , .• , ..1 L--- n q '.7 • ‘;..../•,,,/ , • , , - \.- I _.,. , , . , -,1 i----- 41r- ,O, i• t 13 •:! \' ' .• '•\\ :.'t \ 4%,..? ' -.1 _, ,, _it =Z I''-fi for _,.. __ i.,., .., ,... , I , , , ... .1...„ I.. L__.f, r4.' \ ` Z0- • 5, • , 4 r . - ,')I 1, 111 HO e .-• _.. `• f `4 • ` c - ....e,„:0, s , 1 a•P, .-...,..-!,4741...a.,....._, 3 ..1 •,.1 . r, ,_ ...., 1r- .• ' ! '■•eigire- k .4 i-`-l• . ft 511 . . . _\•-• ‘ 1 ' i ! ! : 1 1=n• i ,,,----- • .. '\ \ t , , y\V,...,,,;"C-\ :'- 1 \ __ - II 1 ' l' ll ' IllP li • \r`\ • \ ,.., ,=, i'.., L: 11 111 , i • \ \ , , , _,,,„vr,,\}:;--:;,,•: ' -.,T - 1 t r: 3,1 ' , "\\ ‘•Air __Oil', -,,,,---,- '-'-,-\ , f1, , . • - , " , . , . , 1. g.`/A 1 z \ "I'l .iiiecti • --' ; •,i, , , _, i , , , 1 \ . ,, ,i--- ..._ <\-,..•• ,,, • ck› ,..• --yaw-_ -14------ 1 .1 ..., ■-')...' If ---•• . ....,is_ ,t..,....., • ..,...,---...e.-: • -Th,,,... — — - t.,--• . s 0 tl, \ \\ It k 32rd 71)•/,:,,, *, ==‘, t —1 e______,-.4----:' \ 1,. • - = 1 -1 ,,...,, \\ \ \---- • - -...„...ic \ , Att.: - -- - • , — _.-- , i ..- i, . i'■ -- ,-- .---, i ......■ I il — — ■ _ _ i r ■- -- — _- ___JIL_ II ° N . -----7- E___ vi __7 . • i - 1111111 t- (i _ .. • • • . ___ • - - . ,- , ; -, , , IIII li 11111 I I L-7: _ . .._ .... t ..._ ■Nioni■to t- —— I .....,,==,, •• 11Pid @/TS NI1' 'N'YDY::: SaLY3H.1. NTYDr2 SG1PTDOSSI\-- I A.GIIIIPA 2-- ...... ../r /----... •<-- , ---. ,,, ,‘,.. ...,, ,..„ ___ -::,, - -11 H ,;... 1 i‘.,----•— Ii-.7- . _ & H ! ,. k; , ti ,- . ..:, - --- -7- 1 III' I--- -7,- i 1. I _ __,_ ___i_ _ -. — =---1— t r- 7 , . ....: 1 ,. --- 1 , , , ■ =, 1 , ; • , . _7: — —1— H • I 1 1 1 r I I ! I it ■ I i I A '`,.—.(1/4—. ',"=,-:, ■ 1 ; tr,\ N'-r-<• 1 ', 1 ! . I 1 ■ I 1 1 7MIL : 11II IIi ! ,,,,, N 1 ' ■ • i .7'.:' - ----,--1-7-77- ,---..-.1---- i i 1—;'7,:',1 ,, i i I i—3 1 1 k'/ i Z I i 3.1 / X ,, r 9 \ E• ! , — -- -- — I —.-1 r -- , r A \ 1 --!---- ‘t- -1 ---I \ -lt s 7 1 /l't ...„ I — t : i , s_- 4... .1,‘ t I — •, ' [Z'''C i I > t'ttx rt.,t \ / lei' ' I; 1‘'N ,,\ ft. 21 — I, tA a I , . - ‘1 '1 ' \ Z,.. ,1 .,',•t i 4 a — 41...1._ t_ -— IP 1 1 1 l'[..1 iri- l ': -- \' 1. ,,tk'i ' .--i 0- ' - i'"` _., . , . [i 1 ; 1 1 ! ,,, ,,‘,..,:, ,k ,l, i 1 I ---------- '/ I) I i 1 1 1 i i I , ,-,,,,\,44,,, "GI,S ktti t „WI::,''. 7:-7 1 0. ---. \. -, , „.. '---- ''-^ 11 I I r."' i / ' ‘:-./ , •---i- 1 , .n.,.! [ , : i ,Alli J-I,\.\ 'D-1 --7-{rts..,•-i \ ' " '\ \ \ ' -t 17 , _• i , i.L.,; scr, t 4 11 I I - -I,• , `,1:i•t A--•— = • — , , • , , 7 , 1 1 t‘ -.■ H'I 1, L I i '7711. •F ..%,, .', ti4 . \ \ ,_ ' , \\ \ ‘, _.----7,, I II! i ' I I • 1, •\_., U0 , 111i1 , , i ' ' .. . ,',,• •= 1:=■„4-, r‘4• ! .S. r---1• 7-- ' 'c\ , ,\ ''-‘":7(..k.--- 1 I 1 11111 I ■ \ \ , >1 ,„. . .. r 7 I i Hi-I, "'.- ' ' . I I I 1 j I 1 ,i , [ ,1; H. d 1 i i 1 1 I 1 1 \ _.,.. - I , I 1 ■ • • . . I I I' 1 !* i I I l■ti I I III it ■ I I ! I ,q)‘\ \.\,1 P4Ct' 0 cooll• 1 I lt- • ----24,--- IIC • • - , a.- 1,11 k -e...:--...° ,c,„. V .•■•1` - c A e ti t _,_., # r 1 It -A----\''''''''' ' , -'-' 1 il _ 21v^d . 7.."),.U;'), '"--,1_,°- '... tS / .•t 1., El • 0 _....., ....__ 1 . .mew■mt ;--1 ''. IN- 1 ..-...... ■ \....._ •r i i , --- % — ikk \ \ ... —a ,...., , ,•,,, - •• 1 111, \.•,. ---) c:b __.. = 1 1 1 I I t (, ) ( ) • .._. ---__ : .._ _ 111I 1 1 I I F . - 1 1 —1-1 ___,• / 1 • ., .,,, _ ......, z t .._ .,.: I-1 Nyi •NYova azavara SYDY3 1 --74 r,•-----. 4[11:■:_. -- urld El.rpt..10 alls ,... - ...., -..„ ..._ -...........”....■•••••••••■••-yw ■--•- ".4.7":.."...."..' ........"....Z.= —...---.. --.7. 7.--r. .::-- "' ..._ • ,___ r, 1, , . il 1 • :114 ----. --- j '1 1 I • ;:,1■1, / . . 1"1 I ' II 1 ,, :z 1:.,,, ., ■ '\ ■!I, ism= ---7-n ,:,..,...\ 1 I 1)1 Iti, i \ PL -.., .\ I. :7.k,, i 1 , ..P I r\ 11' ' k ; .. ; :1 ■\,1 i i i ,1 ;* • ' 1 I / ) 1:11' \All .. 1,' s,'‘ .. •`, i ,. 31, :. ' i ' ' \ I \ s.7•. . / ■ //)/ * H' Z 7 \\\ 41,4111111011110r- 1111 - - } 1 rri 1' 2 \\\ . \ \ I • bk.._ \ \ .. 1 • / \ \ \ \ ...1 . • 1111M1111111111111"111111111111i 11101. Ill!widr ' :* /'P Nihk Lq. linilli /1 .' . / ---171-\:1,', r 16. - 1..111111r-m- - ---7,/AM"g".11■1, '-- -.%1: - . t •'---'- / •-•-----/, -.1111.1".- . • . . • .. ./.. ' . , . . . ,,,....._. 1 1 \ \ ( ■I ;-. ..,. .....--------- i 1, ... .,_____:..____ ___.• _ - ...„--_ . . ---=---- ....--------- ... •■••.■. ---- .. _ _ ... 301•1•1 33NN•A -.....„.. 2 ----- --,-.' - - ----:--------------..,•<" , .....---0. . --------. • . .. . • . • ■2 ,r-,, i!! r!,'.'.1 t; !;:1; VI '.. V 1.i. !I ii : I ; " - ' II ... L.....,j f., • ! 5 1 :!,03.:ig :i th',.. ...II; .•■ 1.----1.:,•.'.:.; ti::5 ! -J--'11 I.•• ;' l ;;;ii ii. : I VII i t 2: - , ;,- ..• !.:-; ;,:,• - •r-t'C r-, i sil !,,•'. ;, .5! 5 Vi'5 ,:i ' ,-.,•Yc ; 41, : .ii'i '7; r. •■ illi '• 5 „ 1 ki1i1. I I 1 il:11 - .1' I:IL/1i!itin 1 1111 lid i +I ! Li :. ".: .- .,-:t, \,,,'711111 i'l—,A1-7-!-I—,' •1_ .-fr<– : ::: I !I si - ::- •• :.-i- i tE '— ---7.‹—E,,, ,,,,..,- L,., \ ''' ''.7,.•:' tt .!...4 1 , .1..■:.:-A i. )- -'--:C_F-7.' .-2=2.•,._-. !•• i. '----- -------- liall 1 =.011.111=11 .1 tows. ' 6300 ..... a... Z • ma". ,...........•■••• ,,,d Ca.,. a,_.....0 , I I NW 'N'YDY:i 2C.I.,Y7:14.1.. !,NDY:i ---.. •--“••-• —,....—.. '---- , I Uzla i:177:n 1---foe:.... ■•■••••••....e...e.....••■••••,.. :..1-7.*:::::.7.::"....7.77"--n7--1::r.- ...- .-- . \ I • i r .---1--,. 1 :: •s f ) f 1 t ■ :: . • I . 1, ! I . 1 . • 1 . „..‹....,, I i I . i 7 8.8, 1 I : ■ .-----. 8 .... II i C727 1 I 1: 1 ! i H 1 1 I\ \ I T------ 1 ' - i:', r>"--'--- 1 fr 9) / 7 o t cc .. "'A° I • i 11 !:',: ',1''' 1 • i '1 7•2 *-i 1 ////ii i: ',0i I i 1,1. iii„•1; a 11, I , i,i ,.,.•p- ,/ .ii ,.,..// / , : ;'. ..: ,•/; " i: : - • /: - , ,-::: • ,.- : ,..:,, .,,, ... .: ,. ; Iy•:: ii I,/ : II 1 1 , . • . .,,,..•-‘ i: ''':: Y I, II I:i: - ii•.1 ': :_i ' , . • . : :. ,:: •• ..... a: - ii• ; •s..---- ---, ' I/ ; ,i'. i.: '/': 1/ .1 — f, •/->„-----•,. ,A)9. ... -- :2 ii LI/ W.:: `,,` I . i'l !! 7.•.I.:i: . ‘ ...,,,_____, '': i',: ,..-•°' - i ,... i ' .-i., • ,____;_>•,_::'... .. '-'.'''.--1-.- I ‘ ...-• t,,,-(EY8 _ :::: .-- -.------- •. ‘ ,... ..., ........— niNA e„.„------8.‘ ....-----8--"- .23)1 321/1c1 ........ . .41 ,; I:..• • 3 I , ' • Titlii , 1 .' .,..!„:, ..,.. - ,,,,,! i ii; , ..... N • . i i,I;;;,i1.;!„;!:';,;!■-i'..7i!;:r:: n'l ' " i i:g 1 1 1 - : hill 4.1 . i i lill. I•' ,1-: H , __..i(-----'4L-;)------'' IIIIi II 1 •:. ,. . , _-.•., .1,i, , ,. ; i '1 4.4 1 .1,., •'; .1.- :i-;:_./.,--r i ; .E. ••••:, • • 41, :II '!":;1 I .73 ,...,`,-H7--,i•' "'I- 0.8. ii y 2 x ''. 4.1. i ; : r t g ; 5, . :, ,- i . •,, :. . - ; •• r• ' : 3 g 0 :, .'8 i ..,.1 -;ff7108' --,,, E;• X, . ,.•;' ;I I • 2: ; ; ; ; I' ; ; = ; ; pz' t 0 • • -; •7•,: I - ...-.0 ; - • 1\'.-.........0"1 - :::..,-.I .: - I'-'' ,-..._ : t Eig ' 'I= 1E .25Iii 1••• ' • i - -,,..-:.0°1"!‘ 7 --.'.- I z,--'" i --it- 1--' • '- 7.1 : i - " -- ' !I, r i il 27,777,1; 77"--7,1: Fer"—*771:,,:, • :-: :":7;1 ....L.--•---, ; -s- ,,.• 1.•,,7, 1 c , , i Z • ••1+1 _ •-•—• i 1=-;.-- "---- : --;-- ,'IStl.,1 is , - '''.- ' •- _ I III li ■ II I:E * t ' I I') . I zlz."-.. • z z;? li;R 1 Z • I 7, (- -3"---..7,F.;-j ;i I : i... 1 ''''' 1;• :: I ;,..,i ,:i..„.1 F ti it '/L.)'' ■Ff.ii: in ijilj!■:! 1 l!i 14--i ----■r-H '; ill 8 .1,:::.i rii:..:11iji;?- i :i i ■::7 : :"--' :r".' ilij—• 411: . V. 1 ' .__I • -4,61 - ..:1,,,,,,■[i :i, . ,...-.....! !: ,, .k .:i :•/, ;; .:''! ,,•; /:..1 • '..,..... .:,:--... :. , ......... •Iiii:;,•..ti,,,:, ; ...,„ .•••a :, !., , 111,1 '1:-.:1 •I / ri• - "I /5•• • . 1! o!.;,:, I: I .il II ..— I) . ,. i i HI:=1 l'Iiii IL. • :1-.• 'I:- Ii.)11II!':•11iIIIIIL., -, „---"7-77--..., •1,:ii:_.-_-.4,:.,,-.::. . --,, . ,. ..,... ..1-- i i t .,) 9 :, .. ' I l''r•IP i. g, s : r ,---,....,— iii.,,, il_rA4, '----"^— ,;,•::'':::::::1 f ■1 :i r';',.."„ s—it .Ji ' ![7:7','!•,r---, ,.1, 2 I I:/3—,..--- -- \ ' 3:;‘".--,, ..I '' , --nN.I 1;,:i• .....!.... — . - -- --._ •,• 34 IH 1 Till F-,/-7-1---i-:---2_,-Q57. -- i ,..:7(--- --,i .'... .1,,1-..,, , :::. E r „ cj,,1-- , -f',,,.'..;*■N ' . 5i s',.4,1„,,:. :1 ".'1:: , o I .. 'i i'V '., . ■:•--- -‘,..-. .1:::'.; I • 1 ,_,.._ .--.--....:' il . ..c ,., , -,...________ .• _ ..-- Eta lima lialt-L_.:. . . • ,\ - ' • , - . fq ! ■4‘ ' • , 11 ' . ,,G 1 •<'.N, ,,,.;\ .\ (I fii • x ,1 \ I i . 4 \\‘'\'''\,-.','\ A ':1 • i I . . .. . 'lir p■r■r■r..cfpli 4• _ _ • ■ ,- ----------I--PILOT KNOB ROA):AsJC.G(4.11.1.(0...31)•'-'" • . •• t __ __I .7-,__Iot.______.11,46_,. 44 •...--, • 7-*---.',7N-'4 \t'(" . . i 1 1 .■ . , , J \: , • „ • , \ ' • , ',--,i I l 1 ' ' i . . ,,,, itk„ ''' • , . . .., • 1. S \---;"-------1,----,-;--- --:---_,--,.. /0 ' NiN,N ' •, s N 's c'r*‘r -,-.• -i. • i ,., , ...„ , • . . ss,.:. , ,,,..„. i -pp T,, ,)-o,i,i•;,,, 1 --', ,,, ,,,,. ..1 ,,-:. I - ,-..,q6••e '- ,. 2 ,I 1 1 1111' ..b.: It ■O t .r.'''::. '' . i• -., i /IA k • i I 1 • -A ' - i -'' •r_1 u''. — '.7:__':-:-.11/) 1‘121-7.---r6--- r--'-' • \ ( ) t /1 --- iz z I; g I - 1 g--• it) .1*,,, \,,i7,,;,;,-, ,,,,, .h iti I t,11 -4 -e vi lj - ) Ti oue_ • . • 5lik -14 ,6T i ? a t.1 j ,-1,_•,--1 g—;r-I -.7.---_-.14, ! i 1 0 ;:,, oil. //,',' , a is R 1 v- - • 1 li I 1 - --t u----1--. • - k ,: i Milt -, .1 -•1 7-- I r 11 !I ELI • I t' 1)11i'cl):-.E:0 -esh)- -0 --t-- MT-)tft---(K)_14a- 4t.--660tfttige,V--.*•• . :=9 6 , i -, 0 IS • . .‘ iiliWiliinlitHi l '. , . 1 [0.- -----.<55 ; i, ,?' • _ i 1'1 -6' *8 i F , 1 5- •,!. E i; A.. , 0:. (LL.. • .• lia5 li' l .n 6 - 7■1 1 1 ,.? QC- • ... F . 'I. li 11\1. Cl.: ----,;j:-.4i,l■ 1 4' Z ii q J1. , . immoiii ,) (4-,,,, :,,,,. ,•,-_,..,-.40, t.n.-- , ; ; . 1-1 \1 • till )1 ;I , ' 1:,.dre.,,,f1 \,__It M .t', i , .. . . • Ii •• f II, i „-------,-,,,, - i.--1--1-,, o ( dlt rj- di,. I 1 , 5 . I ---08-:,-.1,____:- ___,-=-7-, • I \ \ r r) . I 1 , . • p II lit 6 ; to . , , . 4 ' 10;0'0 1 . '=-•--. •-''- • . - c) Cr 10:: 1 . / 1 - k:. . I'l • ',-; > . lie 1 '' -"\-L-7- 171:1: i 11H I I I / . ,) it...IC'Aii, , . I r . .. 4, .. . 'cl'ele-r-ii „ F Z n t ' 41)01 C A 1__ 11 1 . • c s. -- 8 - et 90 . , ,, . .r! * . • ) I 1111 I ' 0 / f.-----=_.----:jiZ:4111,, II,6 j t• 1, .. ' f -•.— _ , ,_ , ,_ , ' -...=.---- ° 7° ! G - 1-11 :. u iii ffi 11.... r: _ //' i 'I) 7 IIP ) --I. fll f 1 . : )' :-,•,,i c..) . \1,•---- .:...) )))•- I CI ,__, NI; \ •:.-. .-) m i_ie,,• -.. - ;_,-, -,-; e-I ; i z HI Z -----= !:= ' I 1 •I'r ‘--i . ,I -7-r1 HT 3 I'T'ic9' _ iii 6 i = I[= - '-`•17-7-1 m , . :. . '‘j i i jj 1-1 1 r\___._■ , ' ; .5 In rn 'fi---iim )4' '* . i I U..F.41 cnn, 1,4 I . Iii f rA AVPNI IF- nn rni I.,il _ \'' BENSHOOF & ASSOCIATES, INC. TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERS AND PLANNERS 7301 OHMS LANE, SUITE 500/EDINA, MN 55439/(612) 832-9858/FAX (612)832-9564 September 15, 1993 REFER TO FILE: 93-38 MEMORANDUM TO: Martin Colon, Federtl Land Company a._ FROM: James A. Benshooand Dennis L. Hansen RE: Traffic Analyses for Town Centre Theater BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE A movie theater is proposed in the southeast quadrant of Yankee Doodle Road and Yankee Place (Town Centre 100-12th Addition). On this approximate 6.7 acre site an eight screen, 1648 seat theater is planned. Construction is proposed to begin in the fall of 1993 with opening in the spring of 1994. On the parcel immediately adjacent to the south side of Yankee Doodle Road and east of Yankee Place, the developer plans two restaurants. No timetable has been established for the development of the restaurants. It is the purpose of this memorandum to: 1) Determine the traffic volumes generated by the theater and restaurants and distribute these volumes to the site driveways and street intersections. 2) Analyze the parking demands of the theater and evaluate where this parking will occur. 3) Develop a plan for effective traffic control at the site driveways and for the safe movement of pedestrians to and from the theater. TRAFFIC FORECASTS Based on the proposed theater and restaurant developments, traffic forecasts were made for the intersection of Town Centre Drive and Yankee Place, and for the proposed entrances to the theater/restaurant site. The traffic forecasting process consisted of the following three step process: 1) To establish existing volumes, manual turning movement counts were made at the following intersections: . Town Centre Drive and Yankee Place • Town Centre Drive and the driveway to Town Centre Shoppes . Yankee Place and the driveway to the Bank These counts were made between the hours of 4:00 PM and 8:00 PM on Wednesday, August 11, 1993. 1 ii Mr. Martin Colon -2- September 15, 1993 2) Traffic generated by the theater was developed using generation rates set forth in an article entitled "Movie Theater Trip Generation Rates," William E. Baumgaertner which appeared in the June 1985 issue of the ITE Journal. Shown in Table 1 are trip generation volumes for an eight screen theater for each hour between 4:00 PM and 8:00 PM on a typical weekday (Monday- Thursday). It was assumed that the theater would have weekday matinees and that there would be no modal split in traffic generation. TABLE 1 EIGHT SCREEN MOVIE THEATER TRIP GENERATION FOR WEEKDAYS - MONDAY THROUGH THURSDAY (WITH WEEKDAY MATINEES - NO MODAL SPLIT) (Passenger Vehicles) Time In Out Total 4 - 5 PM 79 124 203 5 - 6 PM 59 45 104 6 - 7 PM 115 79 194 7 - 8 PM 134 60 194 Directional distribution of all theater traffic to and from the site was designated as primary (new) trips. It was assumed that none would be passby trips. The directional distribution of the primary trips was assumed as follows. . 35% from the west on Yankee Doodle Road . 25% from the east on Yankee Doodle Road ▪ 25% from the west on Town Centre Drive . 15% from the east on Town Centre Drive 3) The third step in forecasting traffic was to develop the traffic generation of the restaurants. Generation rates presented in the ITE publication Trip Generation. 1991, were used. During the peak hour (4:00 to 5:00 p.m.) restaurants with a total seating capacity of 350 would generate a total of 270 trips - 142 entering the site and 128 exiting. For the 7:00 to 8:00 PM hour, the trip generation of the restaurants is estimated to be 50 percent greater than the 4:00 to 5:00 PM period. In determining the directional distribution of the restaurant traffic, it was estimated that 70 percent was primary (new) traffic while 30 percent was passby trips. It was further estimated that the primary trips to and from the restaurants would distribute in the same manner as the theater traffic (see point 2 above). The restaurant passby traffic was assumed to arrive 55 percent from the west on Yankee Doodle Road and 45 percent from the east on Yankee Doodle Road. Accounting for the three preceding points, the resultant traffic forecasts for the time periods of 4:00 to 5:00 PM and 7:00 to 8:00 PM are shown in Figures 1 and 2, respectively. \ YANKEE DOODLE ROAD N 4 REALTY g it RESTAURANT SITE w I W M BANK } �C��a — — QaN I TOWN CENTRE DRIVE •/ k v 311128 l, I I 25/28/28 0/7/29 ► I 62/69/69 THEATER I SITE *' o �o i TOWN CENTRE °' \T__ctioLo____‘, SHOPPES � I N Ar?ti 1 I 3 3j388 N ° • I NOT TO SCALE \ I . p 1993 VOLUMES (8/11/93) T 1993 VOLUMES +THEATER VOLUMES A 1993 VOLUMES +THEATER VOLUMES % 0/3/3 + RESTAURANT VOLUMES E 144/153/ 0/0/0 0. XXX/XXX!X ;K �c 1 / ) 111/130/142 OA? / FIGURE 1 FEDERAL LAND COMPANY TOWN CENTRE FORECAST TRAFFIC _ THEATER VOLUMES FOR TYPICAL Sy BENSHOOF&ASSOCIATES,INC. WEEKDAY PM PEAK TRANSPORTATIDNENGINEERS AND PLANNERS HOUR - 4:00 TO 5:00 PM ar Si 1 c4, C N YANKEE DOODLE ROAD N REALTY v I g [ ES TAURANT SITE I EL' w I w BANK } Tr W co cc) TOWN CENTRE DRIVE J 1,/ o o� 1�I.\g3 ir_9` a I 19/21/21 >I 0/13/46 0, I 58/71/71 THEATER N E co 0 ` SIT I n TOWN CENTRE n' N SHOPPES I I yy2 NOT TO SCALE ■ .� I 1993 VOLUMES (8/11/93) 1993 VOLUMES +THEATER VOLUMES 1993 VOLUMES +THEATER VOLUMES 1. 0/5/5 + RESTAURANT VOLUMES 2 58/73/93 ��07/0�/�0�2 xxx/xxx/xxx FAA/ —.i_ az,9 71/79/97 • J FEDERAL LAND COMPANY FIGURE 2 Sly TOWN CENTRE THEATER FORECAST TRAFFIC VOLUMES FOR TYPICAL BENSHOOF&ASSOCIATES,INC, WEEKDAY 7:00 TO 8:00 PM TRAM SPQRTATIpNENGINEERSANOP�ANNEAS Iri Mr. Martin Colon -5- September 15, 1993 PARKING DEMAND AND ACCOMMODATION Based on interests expressed by City staff and Council Members, parking usage characteristics for the theater have been examined for two scenarios: typical busy period and peak period for the year. Both scenarios address conditions experienced on Saturday evenings because that is the busiest time during the week for theater attendance. Throughout most of the year, experience by Mann Theaters is that peak occupancy for Saturday night showings is about 40 percent of the total theater seats. To address the peak condition during one of the busiest Saturday nights of the year, Mann Theater staff have provided data regarding seat occupancy experienced on Saturday nights during the summer of 1993 at the Maple Grove Theater, which is an eight screen facility. This occupancy information represents a peak condition for three reasons: 1) the summer period typically is the busiest time of year for the theater industry, 2) theater attendance during the summer of 1993 has set an industry record, arid 3) the Maple Grove Theater has been highly successful. The occupancy results for this peak condition at the Maple Grove Theater are presented in Table 2. TABLE 2 PEAK PERCENTAGE OF THEATER SEATING CAPACITY OCCUPIED ON SATURDAYS DURING BUSIEST TIMES OF YEAR Date Day of Week Percentage of Capacity 12/26/92 Saturday 38 6/19/93 Saturday 45 6/25/93 Saturday 41 7/17/93 Saturday 49 7/31/93 Saturday 37 8/13/93 Saturday 37 8/20/93 Saturday 33 The next step is to translate the theater occupancy characteristics previously discussed into parking demand. One key factor for this purpose is the car occupancy, i.e. average number of theater customers per vehicle. The article, "Movie Theater Trip Generation Rates" by William E. Baumgaertner previously referenced indicates a occupancy rate for theater destined vehicles of 2.4 persons per vehicle. This is based on a survey of two theaters in the Maryland/Virginia area. Our sense is that the average vehicle occupancy for the proposed Mann Theater may be higher. One reason for this comment is that we have reviewed substantial car occupancy data for events at the Met Center in Bloomington. These data indicate that the average for hockey games is 3.0 persons per car with a distinctly higher vehicle occupancy ratio experienced for family shows. Another factor that needs to be accounted for in the parking demand calculations involves customers who arrive prior to the departure of patrons from a previous movie showing. Based on their operating experiences, Mann Theater staff have indicated that this overlap parking demand amounts to 50 to 75 vehicles during a busy period. In addition to customer parking, it also is important to account for employee parking. Based on their operating experiences at the Maple Grove Theater, Mann Theater staff have indicated the following two points: 1) about 12 employees would be working at the theater during a Saturday evening period and 2) about four employee vehicles would be parked on-site during this time period. The reason for the parking count to be less than the employee count is that the majority of the employees are teenagers who either ride together or are dropped off by a parent. i Mr. Martin Colon -6- September 15, 1993 Utilizing the four factors previously discussed (seat occupancy, vehicle occupancy, overlap parking demand and employee parking), the total expected parking demand for the proposed theater has been calculated for the two analysis scenarios as follows: Peak Parking Demand for a Typical Saturday Night Applying the 40 percent occupancy to the total 1648 seats results in 659 occupied seats. Applying the 2.4 vehicle occupancy rate to the number of patrons results in 275 parked vehicles. Accounting for the estimated maximum overlap parking demand of 75 vehicles and four employee vehicles results in a total peak parking demand of 354 vehicles. Peak Parking Demand for One of Busiest Saturday Nights of Year Applying the 50 percent occupancy to the total 1648 seats results in 824 occupied seats. Applying the 2.4 vehicle occupancy ratio, and the 75 vehicle overlap parking demand and the four spaces for employees, as above, results in a total peak parking demand for this scenario of 424 vehicles. From the standpoint of parking supply, the proposed theater plan provides 366 on-site parking spaces. In addition, a "proof of parking" commitment has been made that would provide, if necessary, construction of 58 additional parking spaces on property immediately east of the theater site on the north side of Town Centre Drive. For the two analysis scenarios, the expected distribution of theater parking among the various facilities is shown in Table 3. TABLE 3 EXPECTED DISTRIBUTION OF PARKED VEHICLES FOR THEATER USERS DURING PEAK PARKING DEMAND PERIOD Percentage of No. of Parked Vehicles Theater for Theater Users Total Parking Parking Typical Sat. Peak Sat. Spaces Available Parking Facility Demand Night Night in Facility Theater Lot 80 283 339 366 Town Centre Shoppes 9 32 ' 38 711 Restaurants 8 28 34 129 Other 3 11 13 N/A 100 354 424 1 Just eastern portion of Town Centre Shoppes development I1 � Mr. Martin Colon -7- September 15, 1993 PLAN FOR TRAFFIC AND PEDESTRIAN MOVEMENTS Considering the significant level of traffic and pedestrian activity that will be generated by the theater, it will be important to safely accommodate such movements. As mentioned in the parking analysis section, it is expected that 32 to 38 vehicles for theater users will be parked in the Town Centre Shoppes parking lot on Saturday nights. Thus, a plan needs to be established that will provide a high level of safety for persons walking between the Town Centre Shoppes lot and the theater. One important item to accomplish such safety is to encourage the pedestrians to cross at marked intersection crosswalks, rather than at unmarked mid-block locations. Another important point involves the relationship between the traffic volumes on Town Centre Drive and the volume of pedestrians who would cross Town Centre Drive. Since traffic and pedestrian movements will peak quite sharply at the beginning and end of movie showings, this analysis focuses on expected conditions during the peak half hour on a typical Saturday night. From a traffic volume standpoint, Figure 2 shows that the expected two-way volume (after completion of the theater and restaurant developments) on Town Centre Drive south of the Yankee Place intersection will be 234 vehicles from 7 to 8 PM on a typical Monday - Thursday evening. Accounting for higher restaurant and theater traffic on a Saturday night, but lower background traffic, it is expected that the peak half hour traffic volume on Town Centre Drive south of Yankee Place will be 175 to 225 vehicles. From a pedestrian volume standpoint, it is expected during the peak half hour on a typical Saturday night that about 55 pedestrians would cross Town Centre Drive. This projection is based on the number of vehicles that would park in the Town Centre Shoppes lot, the 2.4 car occupancy factor, and expected peaking characteristics. The preceding traffic and pedestrian volumes are significant, but do not pose any extraordinary safety or capacity difficulties. Utilizing these projections, the next step was to develop an effective traffic and pedestrian plan. Major feat:::-es of the recommended plan are described next. All three site access driveways are recommended to be controlled by stop signs on the approaches to Town Centre Drive. The existing stop sign for eastbound Town Centre Drive at Yankee Place is recommended to remain in place. At the intersection of Town Centre Drive and Yankee Place it is unlikely that traffic generated by the theater alone will warrant a four-way stop. However, with future development within Town Centre, including the restaurants, such traffic control likely will become warranted and needed. Analysis of the volumes shown in Figures 1 and 2 indicates that the intersection of Town Centre Drive and Yankee Place would operate at better than level of service C under four-way stop control. From these figures, the post-development peak hour volumes entering the intersection are 723 for the 4 to 5 PM hour and 730 for the 7 to 8 PM hour. The Highway Capacity Manual indicates'that this type of intersection could accommodate 2,000 vehicles per hour at level of service C - 2.7 times more traffic than the projected volumes. Two major conclusions established from this analysis are: . When warranted and installed, four-way stop control . "1 accommodate the projected post-development volumes at a high levee -rvice. . Since the intersection volumes could increase 2.7 and still remain within level of service C, the four-way stop control will e to effectively accommodate traffic growth expected with future opment in the Town Centre area. IC Mr. Martin Colon -8- September 15, 1993 Marked crosswalks are recommended across all four approaches at the intersection of Town Centre Drive and Yankee Place, and across Town Centre Drive on the north side of the middle driveway. These crosswalks are recommended to be longitudinally striped with markings to increase their identity and safety for pedestrian movements. Pedestrian crossing signs are recommended for installation in advance of and at the crosswalks on Town Centre Drive. New sidewalk connections to link the parking areas with the theater via the marked crosswalks should be constructed. For the safety of pedestrians, it is recommended that additional street lighting be provided at the intersection of Town Centre Drive and Yankee Place and at the middle driveway. Currently, there is a street light in the northeast corner of Town Centre Drive and Yankee Place. This street light should be supplemented with a similar unit in the southwest corner of the intersection. A street light should also be provided in the northeast corner of the Town Centre Drive/middle driveway intersection (adjacent to the marked crosswalk). The recommended traffic and pedestrian plan, which includes all the items previously mentioned, is shown in Figure 3. CONCLUSIONS Based on the traffic forecasts, parking demand evaluation, and traffic control considerations, the following conclusions have been established: 1) With the theater generated traffic, the street system will operate at an effective level of service. 2) For a typical Saturday night condition, the peak parking demand will be about 354 vehicles, which is less than the on-site parking supply of 366 spaces. 3) For one of the busiest Saturday nights of the year, the peak parking demand will be 424 vehicles. This parking demand will be effectively accommodated, with most users parking on-site. About 38 theater users would be expected to park in the Town Centre Shoppes lot and about 34 in the lots for the restaurants. Ample spaces are available for this parking, and no adverse impacts are expected. If it is found that additional parking stalls are needed for the theater, "proof of parking" for 58 additional spaces is being provided. 4) Pedestrian safety and convenience in crossing Town Centre Drive to and from the theater will be accomplished by providing appropriate sidewalk connections, marked and signed crosswalks, and street lighting. As further development occurs in the Town Centre area, four-way stop sign control likely will become warranted at the intersection of Town Centre Drive and Yankee Place, which will enhance pedestrian safety. esmomm IN a _ STREET LIGHT ... — / -N - I -IL *ç �� CROSS�VAIK _ �111111111 .7 � .-22� 1' 1 a ii„�.r u 0 S1OE, 4T\ ►•+ 2 1 - - -- ��11N �N1 - 0_ t� \ W e 1 \ EF l • STREET LIMIT / 17 W I• o N Z / e, J6 / ,il - / o� / s>6'\ \ \‘‘, o \ \ \‘‘ -\W , STREET ■ �� LIGHT -1_,I I\ K f\ \ G OSE,,S4 r`�`\ . I. i 6 S\oE�'r�- COENTRE / se-.r� �� SHOPPES \ iir-. 1 ,! . ' \ ‘, ---N NOTE: ADVANCE PEDESTRIAN CROSSING SIGNS TO BE PLACED ON NORTHBOUND ' TOWN CENTRE DRIVE AND SOUTHBOUND YANKEE PLACE 1" = 60' FIGURE 3 FEDERAL LAND COMPANY TOWN CENTRE -' THEATER RECOMMENDED PLAN FOR -� TRAFFIC CONTROL AND iii? BENSHOOF&ASSOCIATES,INC. PEDESTRAIN MOVEMENTS TRANSPORTAIIONENCINEERS AND PLANNERS • ( .„)---D APPENDIX r5Arapri Ari MEMORANDUM _ ST PAUL MN _ P,NNEAPOLIS MN N ST CLOUD-MN N CHIPPEWA FALLS WI N M,D!SON_ l"✓1 To: Tom Colbert, Director of Public Works Jon Hohenstein, Assistant City Administrator From: Cindy Gray, Transportation Planner Tom Sohrweide, Traffic Engineer Date: September 3, 1993 Subject: Proposed Multi-Screen Movie Theater, southeast corner of Yankee Doodle Road and Yankee Place, Eagan, Minnesota SEH File No. A-EAGAN9401.00 INTRODUCTION As you requested, we have reviewed the proposed site plan for the eight-screen theater at the southeast corner of Yankee Doodle Road and Yankee Place in Town Center of Eagan. We believe that the City's concerns expressed to us in the areas of parking capacity, access location and on-site circulation are very valid and need to be addressed. You requested that we determine the extent of the site which would need to be used to meet the city's zoning requirement of one parking space per three seats, minimizing impacts to the pond/wetland, incorporating the additional 15 feet of right of way on the south side of Yankee Doodle Road while maintaining a 20 foot parking setback, and adhering to all other applicable setback requirements. We were also asked to place driveways in locations which would minimize impacts to traffic flow on Yankee Place and at the intersection of Yankee Place and Yankee Doodle Road. This memo summarizes our concerns about the proposed site plan for the theater and describes the advantages and disadvantages of three alternative site layouts which we developed over the past week. PROPOSED SITE PLAN Parking The City's zoning ordinance requirement of one parking space per three seats results in a parking requirement of 549 parking spaces for a theater with 1648 seats. This requirement is closely supported by Institute of Transportation Engineers (IfE) data in the 2nd edition of Parking Generation (1987), which shows a Saturday evening parking requirement for a movie theater with 1648 seats at 502 spaces (1 space per 3.28 seats). The II'E data was taken from a somewhat limited sampling of nine theaters, ranging in size from 750 to 3150 seats, with an average of 1542 seats. Nevertheless, two of the theaters studied had Saturday night peak occupied parking ratios of approximately one space per 2.4-2.7 seats. Both theaters have approximately 1700 seats. To illustrate the situation,assume that two thirds of the theaters seats are taken during the early evening showing of movies on a busy Saturday night. Assuming an average of three persons per car,362 parking spaces would be used. The proposed site plan provides 365 theater parking spaces,, including the nine handicapped parking spaces. Assuming full use of the nine :handicapped spaces, this would leave 3 spaces open for use by early arrivals to the late showing of the movies. Customers who arrive after these spaces fill up will have to choose between circulating around the lot until the people from the early movies begin to leave, or will look elsewhere in the area for a parking space. In the case of the proposed site plan, with a conceptual restaurant plan on the north side of the site,the restaurant parking will be an attractive alternative,as will the other ;parking lots across Yankee Place. This could ultimately result in the City having to deal with unhappy property owners on neighboring sites where overflow theater parking is unwelcome. Furthermore, it could result in safety concerns for customers who need to cross Yankee Place to get to and from the theater. We recommend that the City require the entire site to be used for on-site theater parking at this time. If there is still a desire to place restaurants on the site in the future after the theater has 'become established in the community, the owners could conduct peak occupied parking studies during the busiest months of the year(July and December,according to ITE Parking Generation) to show whether or not adequate parking capacity is available. Access Locations The site presents an excellent opportunity to align the main entrance with Town Center Drive inr the other existing driveway approximately 225 feet south of Yankee Place on Town Center Drive. The proposed site plan shows accesses at both of these locations. The location and design of the northerly driveway which aligns with Town Center Drive appears satisfactory. The close proximity of the building to this driveway could cause drivers to drop off or pick up passengers in the driveway instead of turning down the drive-aisle in front of the building. If drivers notice that traffic behind them is beginning to back up toward the main entrance, they will most likely either circulate around the parked vehicle into the parking area north of the building or they will turn down the aisle which runs along the front of the building. Our main concerns with the south driveway include 1) the close proximity of the driveway to the building, 2) the interaction between vehicles entering and exiting the site, pedestrians walking to and from the building and 3) dropping off and picking up of passengers just inside the site. First, the driveway is so close to the building that the row of parking along the south side of the building blocks the approach into the right outbound lane. Furthermore, back-up of exiting vehicles in the driveway will block traffic flow in the north/south drive-aisle along the front of the building. 2 Another concern is with the interaction of vehicles and pedestrians at this location. Most of the parking on the proposed site is located south of the building. People walking to and from their vehicles will concentrate at the southwest corner of the building,just inside the south driveway. Other vehicles will be dropping off and picking up passengers in this area. This will cause queues of traffic in the driveway that could inhibit the smooth progression of traffic along Town Center Drive. The concentration of vehicles and pedestrians at this location is undesirable. If the building is approved at the proposed location,we recommend that the southerly driveway be moved south approximately 220 feet, where it will be more centralized to the parking area and cause less interference in the area adjacent to the building. An improved approach to the two lane exit could be developed in this area as well. A driveway at this location would, however, require great care in planning the boulevards around the curve, to insure that berms, plantings, and signs do not interfere with the necessary lines of sight around the curve. On-Site Circulation The most significant concern over on-site circulation is the close proximity of the building to the south driveway, as described above. As previously mentioned the point of congestion which will result from a driveway in the proposed location will not only result in inconvenience for customers, it will also impact the progression of traffic on Town Center Drive, as drivers wait for traffic in the driveway to clear so they can pull into the site, and also brings up some safety concerns for customers walking to the theater entrance. ALTERNATIVE SITE DESIGN CONCEPTS The attached site design concepts were prepared with the purpose of determining how much of Outlot G would need to be used in order to meet the City's parking requirement, minimize impact to the wetland,and incorporate the additional 15 feet of right of way requirement on the south side of Yankee Doodle Road. The architect's building footprint was used, as well as information provided on the site plan regarding the boundaries of the wetland. Alternative A The dashed lines on the site layout indicate the parking areas which are designated as restaurant buildings and parking areas on the applicant's site plan. Advantages: - Driveway aligns with Town Center Drive Driveway designed with two outbound lanes - No access along Yankee Place between Town Center Drive and Yankee Doodle Road 3 D,3 - Dropping off of passengers could take place in the drive-aisle in front of the building, farther away from the driveways - Building location cuts down on impact to wetland Meets City parking requirement using nine foot stalls, and meets the need indicated by ITS; information using ten foot stalls Disadvantages: Parking located in northeast corner of the site is over 500 feet from the theater entrance. Since the aisle in front of the building would serve as both a parking aisle and a drop-off and pick-up aisle, congestion and delay in the aisle will occur. - Handicapped spaces located in the dead-end aisle north of the building need to be well signed and marked so drivers can see that they are handicapped spaces from the driveway. Alternative B Advantages: - Access aligns with Town Center Drive - Access provides two exit lanes - No access along Yankee Place between Town Center Drive and Yankee Doodle Road Dropping off and picking up of customers could take place along drive-aisle in front of the building, farther away from the main driveway. Meets City parking requirement using nine foot stalls and provides enough parking according to ITE information using ten foot stalls Disadvantages: Distance between parking at northeast corner of the site and the main entrance is approximately 570 feet. South driveway could become a point of congestion if drivers drop off passengers at the southwest corner of the building. South driveway is located on a curve, making it very important to prevent any sight distance restrictions i.e. berms, landscape plantings, signs,� etc. . The drive aisle in front of the building will serve as both a parking aisle and a drop-off aisle, resulting in congestion and delay. 4 Alternative C This alternative was drawn up mainly for the purpose of showing an improved drop-off aisle in front of the building and improved overall on-site circulation. The disadvantage of extremely remote parking is listed below. Advantages: Main entrance aligns with existing driveway on Town Center Drive south of Yankee Place Main entrance has two outbound lanes. Highly visible location for theater - Drive-aisle in front of building serves as a circulation aisle rather than a parking aisle, making it easier to drop off and pick up passengers without blocking parking spaces,and blocking access to large parking areas. Disadvantages: - Extremely remote parking south of main entrance - Inability to meet parking requirements using this site design SUMMARY The attached concepts provide some guidance as to what is needed to meet the City's parking requirement, and suggest ways to improve the access and on-site circulation. As previously stated, the g P plan osed lan showin a subdivision of Outlot G to provide a parcel for restaurants on the north side of the site is not recommended, as it does not leave enough space for on-site theater parking. This is likely to result in future difficulties for the city in terms of neighboring properties which experience overflow theater parking,and pedestrian crossings of Yankee Place. In addition to the parking situation, on-site traffic operations problems are anticipated at the proposed south theater entrance due to the close proximity of the building.. • If you have any questions regarding the proposed site or the attached concepts, please contact us at 490-2071 (Cindy) or 490-4072(Tom). Thank you for the opportunity to work on this project with the City of Eagan. 5 yo.:,Kit L.0.,..E SAC ` -- -- r -- -- -- 1 a} 0 ;,1 -- — 1. i'_1, -"T--' L-T'� --T— T f IYL® ---4 r I' 1 1 1 �,I Z Q 1\1 I� 1 1 :IZQ �I 5 i '1 T— --- J I 1 i 1 Y it / ////1 1 . / 7 G Ja II3 ©I' Z I / S Go*" ,�, ' vf1 — AI+e, a+ive A -----... (-7• Theo+<. Onky ' ID' St�11 /pflh e acust ' \l � \ � ��3 sp,i ib OE QLU w \\\ t`=`�,o Sic tpral 1.1,.1\/3-Z��r..� 4...:..--,-. Ilory� 0 QCC[S`-= I a,9 OGulln OG attest 2 trial I FloU /2.419 Sea+= \ \ \ / . h� V1 - J \ \ \(r.,) 0 � J rJ, \ \ Y 1 . tea ✓ 1, J LI l! ) i., (-- ;,'1. ° - - -- -- - --- —1— 5 -r--- ,° -7 - e:-..7_,..7...::: �--1 -' °-- - ,— ---- - ---� ; .ia , , 1 1 J , I , 1 t is 6 �'® O He Z_J A / N ALT ER N AT I V E B c / 'Treater Qn Iy '- / 10' Sratl5 \ 0 O 1 324 Plonk OC GGGf55 195 5G•147,oC a«•SS �� 519 +c-GI 1 e•an/Big'Sen-: f� ��A • �� � 1--"I' Stalls • , • \\ " r ra,.of acce4• t\ \• \ • \ 5(07 -•-c',., 1 '.ai1/291 sea-hs • \\ �� e �c``o t \:j,,., \ \`. \,..„.K...4......, 0...,.\' ‘,.., .... .... \\ __ _ ___ ....,,,. _ \ \ , \,...,___------ . ....,... :., \-,-. , _.., __.,.., , \,...\ (,,. „ ----1 \, ,...,,/ r \ .\ \ j (/- c J 1 (.,------ 7-1 1--- i "I— ■ Imo- i ,its I 14. IA li ri J �4c; 1C ., /�"' • -o (,9 I"i ...1111111,,, H ) . i :...,',- \ 1 .-7 / / ALTER NATIVE C / Theckkr Only / Ip' Stalls L-7!{ nurtt1 of access II 3 5,1,:�r. c=o.cc55 442 i'ulal :lall/5.-3 Seats .5 �� q' Stalls \ 301 rorall of occess I4j 53t{t, 04-0CC?SS 452 tcm/ 1 -_,!ulf/3.42 seats Aa Q* C,51r. <, to 'G/Kiec:‘ xu,/...o driveway: ax,, "v' {ee+ ,1' 4 a a� \ i i6 C)4 ,,-1.:L.-_-; .,.."--'5-";.----*"--;'----- -----‘ -7 --' - D K e 21 a 5',47, J , 09/17/93 14:22 FAX SEH ST. PAUL - -4 EAGAN Cm002/004 rA•Prse MEMORANDUM ❑ ST.PAUL,MN 0 MINNEAPOLIS,MN 0 ST.CLOUD,MN U CHIPPEWA FALLS,WI ❑ MADISON,WI TO: John Hohenstein,Assistant City Administrator Tom Colbert, Director of Public Works FROM: Cindy Gray,Transportation Planner DATE: September 17, 1993 SUBJECT: Eagan, Minnesota,Town Center, Mann Theatre Proposal,Yankee Doodle Road and Yankee Place SEH File No. A-EAGAN9401.00 As you requested, I have reviewed the September 15, 1993 traffic analysis prepared by Benshoof and Associates, Inc. for Martin Colon of Federal Land Company. Their analysis addressed*heater traffic volumes,2)parking demands,and 3)driveway traffic control and pedestrians at Yankee Place/Town Center Drive. This memo responds to these items. 1. Theater Traffic Volumes and Traffic Forecasts 2. The volumes shown in Figures 1 and 2 represent weekday volumes. Although background volumes may be somewhat less on Saturdays, theater volumes would be significantly higher and would increase most of the turning movements shown. 3. The weekday analysis shown does not take into account any future development in the remaining lots within Town Center or on the property north of Yankee Doodle Road. 4, Parking Demand The parking demand was calculated based on the percentage of theater capacity occupied at the Mann's Maple Grove Theater. According to the Benshoof analysis,these percentages were developed by using the total number of tickets sold and averaging them between the early and late movie showings. Generally, the early showings of movies have a significantly higher attendance than the late shows which start at 9:00 pm or later. Therefore, I do not believe that the peak percentage of 49 percent represents a true peak which would occur during the early evening movies. Unfortunately,none of my sources on parking generation or trip generation for movies provide any information on the peak number of occupied seats at movie theaters, so I 09/17/93 14:23 FAX SEH ST. PAUL -►-►-► EAGAN Z003/004 John Hohenstein Tom Colbert September 17, 1993 Page 2 am unable to offer any alternative percentages which could be applied to the early movie showings. However, the data provided by the ITh Parking Generation publication, and the Urban Land Institute's publication entitled Shared Parking show parking demand which closely supports the City's current parking requirement of one space per three seats,indicating a higher percentage of occupied theater seats during the early movies on a Saturday evening. I reviewed the article on movie trip generation referenced in the Benshoof analysis and agree that it is appropriate to use a vehicle occupancy factor of 2.4 persons, especially for the hours which we are concerned about on Saturday evenings. I feel it is inappropriate to assume shared parking at the restaurants proposed on the north side of the site,because the peak parking occupancy at the restaurant could very likely occur during the same time period as peak parking demand at the theater. If the vehicles parked at the restaurant are reassigned to the Town Center Shops, the total number of vehicles parking across Yankee Place would be increased. Using the Benshoof figures shown in Table 3 of their analysis,this would increase the parking at Town Center Shoppes from 38 to 72, filling up the spaces in the eastern portion of that site. Assuming an average of 2.4 people per vehicle, this would result in 173 people crossing Yankee Place in the 30-40 minutes during which movies are scheduled to begin. However, I feel that these figures should actually be higher,given that they are based on only 49 percent occupancy of theater seats. Traffic Control and Pedestrian Provisions Our retain concern over using a 4-way stop at the intersection of Yankee Place and Town Center Drive is the potential for stacking of southbound vehicles which could impede the smooth flow of traffic from the Yankee Doodle Road/Yankee Place intersection.. This is not likely to be a problem with today's level of 'development, but could very well become a future problem given the amount of development which can still occur to the north, and the remaining parcels to be developed within Town Center. If a 4-way stop were installed now, and removed later to eliminate vehicle queuing problems, drivers would be placed in the situation of having free-flowing cross-traffic where there once was stopping traffic. This is difficult to adjust to,and can result in an increase of accidents. 09/17/93 14:23 FAX SEH ST. PAUL 444 EAGAN ( 1004/004 John Hohenstein Tom Colbert September 17, 1993 Page 3 At this time,marked crosswalks,pedestrian crossing signs,sidewalks along the project entrances and the additional street lighting discussed in the Benshoof analysis are recommended. The four-way stop is not recommended for the reasons discussed above. If a restaurant is developed on the north side of the site, and four-way stop control appears to be necessary, the warrant analysis could be prepared based on actual traffic counts. Conclusion In summary, it does not seem appropriate to base peak parking demand on a combined early and late show occupancy of 49 percent, since the early shows are more heavily attended. We recommend holding off on the installation of a four-way stop until such time as existing traffic volumes warrant this type of traffic control. We do not recommend approval of the site given the current number of parking spaces proposed on the site. It has been shown that the entire outlot can closely meet the City's parking requirement for movie theaters. Given winter conditions, future increases in traffic volumes,and the fact that many movies are geared toward attendance by families with children, an assurance of adequate on-site parking is optimal. run 1 1.1.•■■ 09/09/93 16:39 FAX SEE ST. PAUL 4-•-■ EAGAN a002/007 / /.. ..,,, _..., ..A..;_j: ..„.../ . I L'. it,&1 .• . . . . ........._.............1................z. , ., .,;..... :.,;....:::.::..:.,:;.C.:....,ti. ...Th..777,..i.„?..,!: 5_,....0:01.....4........\,... li •••• - 4.11. y lb.,:,:it.....Ir.. 4 .....-. ... .s" .44:re. .4;.:1•-4 7.!...r. ; ,.. . It:Z.7;-'.,„ -.:7'..r,".'.. -'..,_ . . ' ••l'ati•,,.:11..0.T."-•••-•"-...._ •.". ..:,,,..:?..L.,.!.1•• ,zf, ..,'.7,.;.,,,>,1,4:••- '.• ••?'..., ....4.,,..4.‘)1,4"...: -; 7'..,-0! .scbr,•%.--.,.."--.- '.7....s.ir''-, .z;<-37, ....,,,45-- :-.-, -...4,-,-., ....-:-..,,>-;...\,..,..,,,,- .D.,if..:,w,,,v,,::_-,, ,--• ,-, - -..J ..... • - - , -,..-,-.-.4;-...rzvi,...-2::---. 4,0L-74t, :::.-- .c•c••!' '''".. ---.-1:zzeitttrt. pw.7.-..4a*,... ..-.4..s . . --:.....:v:ttrc,...--..,--z...----vrv--:_,_..._....:r-_-c 77::::,7: .:::-..• ,-.. • .. .....,. a, ,...,„_,„:7..'-7 Z-C....". .'' - ':,,•- • " •••41.4-,it,....c,ilT .- -'. •• rf.7. -.7.... "5%14. ....Al.:4'7.1 - 4.4._.-ti..... '. '..-.1iy • .....;47!...; : .::-....7.::: ."..'.'r2i.:.•:::::.-1.:41 ,14.'`"''', -- - ...k-'• ,*7.4.--•"■;.: 3 C'Z!..:?.....7f: .-.._..:.,-;.:::6 -#:,:”ip',.. . -.. i 4 zi.,• ... :,...„..4. ,---,41.4.--. - •". "".1".:L -..., • . ,....:,4<-...1.- ... - .. '..,.......-:?..,,,,,--i4 ---t,..-..kx..----...,-,.. . -a...--- • - i:,..4,i. 4:1,4z-,.....7; .1'....,...? :t4te".4iv. • .Xl.f,„?..... •1* -. '1.0.."-!■.• 4'so---'I•r• - ... ..W.I. -.Zi'.rik • -:::....:}::?: . ::i.W.'' C"II- 1tellt.:1% i; '.V1:. .--:';.1::1:,;47:.*:.-:.-f., :,..7.2.1:r W'P.I. :::::..i."*.;-;.f.'?:... ,vpi„...1.,. . _,,........P.4•,,Z.;:rpArAr....- .-71.1,02 4•;•,?7,11,:' • . "Ir•'•.. es...t .1%.•••-'-‘.%-••••t, •••■......... ..••i • ,1 d• • • ,... .•::)10.ti. n- -;es.% .1. ---• +I, ••.-...ge.,.11;-., -,---4,7' ....:A.• ...-.. ,.trit t '--140 ....29:c. 7.tie,- ....;e2`.._..‘.;.., •7....;4, •:4% • • V9 .1 ...791I.X:ir. .•:::;,......iKat. • •4•4....0. -40! -... 'Werte'. .;:e ". . •% , -Cei ix .1!.113 ;44."-. .■::,....4. ':.".41:1•Zt.-.:i 7:4 t?;. lit:-!.1i -;:.."7:.;!t7.i:: f 7.ci::1.4'.?■;':5:?";; :::iiit;S:: ..1:::•••.;;:::.7:.i-1 I.:* ;.tt ;:::....iii;".17P-.41,.'•''.4'..7.Z-... :: ; ,‘.:ef...ijie"......-il- 1 , ,...... • vf.+,..,.. ...--7..;* ' ......• •;-• .• .. •4,,..,:.:...!•=•. - '• I" • " . 4.-tkiir...f1;41 i.1,7t7... '.:•••■•;il... --*••••' 4 s...'.;:;.11 11"1-::.e.,.... .......:..it,..i.:i"F..;Ia.:..:"....,t7;...41:4.4,4.,...:4...i 71.ii.•":3:1.;:::i.:::::.,e..1...v....:tti izt i. ...!.....t.:::::;...,;"1:.4.-.1 i..;.:.:;:i.;":1 w:.....,,.:11.1‘.;".:'...,.4',.,..is-.41.:::',...ci.1.......,..::.....11..c.x:.,....,. _:::::,:i.....f.,..,.,..:..1.4:i.:f4,:,.......::..".......;.........1..:.; :;.;,......ii ;l . _......,‘.._.:...::::.;-........;...::.„.:..........*..,:.....t:-:..,...i.::::.-.:i ...-.......,.........:-;.:.:.........:_..-!..-.....,:-....4......i,........?....e......:•::........:7_...iii.........i...::::.......::..-..:;:r-sr.::...:::::.- ..,.. .,....:i.i.. ........).,.,...:",:;,;;,. 4., • ..1.1. :•:s:1:.:i.-.. 4--...i:t ...,;,........:.4„,..5:7 ..:.•;:ea: ::•.f.'..;:!;.;; gi . 1:•:.." -' ......e...._,,nerew..................................,............,..... ..---_ ..........-......._,....,_ '''''4'4:74_13-'jg,-.:14•-• 4.itir . . ' . • - rir, ,471t, ...:;....,:i. ,.l..... at ....- ... - . . I ,-.•., ...— --..--,....--:-...,...._!,,,,...,. --,7.:--,7..........,.. ,.............. ...,4.-rr...7............,„....,77-.,........t..c.—,...." .—:..--7..t.„, - —,,,.. 1.0„4„...... ..,.,.. •• ,...,,,.. ....„w„.., 7 __-..." 1,124 ..- .MAO .1.;•.,-/ ....,. .. • .,■.1. --..... ,. st " ri....44...,.. :"t"1%- 11•.a.■••■... .:::.#•- : .,t, ; 7 . .... 7: . .. • ....t r......›. 'tir _ ... :•, •••• • k 4,,,,i-. , - ..,...:....•,--,-.7,,-z% ..r.-.4. - t.... ..-...r ::‘-L.'..''''''''...,C.°.,•4 , 1 / . 1. • .' -..-.1k.. !i ,, 5. Jo , ..... • - ',..41:,... ' - "• . . -......,. • -.4.1.7::.'.7.•...7.4.-.. .:7...zi.:::„;, . .....-:‘.-.:.-...•...,;..•...i.:.. .... aj•.:.:.',,.:;--;;.•.-.f.•..::..... . .• ,.:.... . ,,,,•-;z:.:_;:.-...,>,... - • , . ., ‘. ..•. ..•.,'• .....:-.4.'Vx........-...-"....•-••......... .7,!..:7.....-:-. ..............•. to .. ... 4 ..... •-' '• • •. " r , 1 . A STUDY CONDUCTED UNDER THE DIRECTION OF Illi—THE URgAll LAND INSTITUTE II. . _ BY BARTON-ASCHMAM ASSOCIATES, INC. —_ ..... . .... R-95% \. "J) —;)— . . • 09-09-93 04: 37FM P002 #45 09/09/93 16:40 FAX SEH ST. PAUL -+4+ EAGAN ei 003/007 io et be a )cited ratio between 4.0 and 5.0 for centers having EWTERTA E11T PAil�UKC BEMAWD en 40D,000 and 600,000 square feet.31 dost bevie This study addressed two types of entertainment wed . INKY ACCOMULTIOM most typically found in mixed-use and multiuse proj- k for ects—restaurants and cinemas.Restaurants surveyed °m' The aggregate parking accumulation surveys for a in the study were high-quality, sit-doom-type restate veep weekday and a Saturday are shown in exhibit 7.On the rants, with lounge facilities of substantial size. Cin- 1P°' weekday, a steady buildup of demand typically oc- emas were high-quality, multiscreen movie theaters x Re. curred after 8:00 a.m.,reaching a smooth peak shortly favoring current, popular motion pictures. after 12:00 noon and slowly tapering off until 6:00 p.m.,when a shorter evening peak took place.Certain IISTAUAJIS " retail facilities,however tend to cater either to midday The survey included eight suburban restaurants, or evening hour demands during the weekday.In these ey �' facilities, the weekday parking accumulation curves , fig size from 5,400 to 17,000 square feet of le• eaked.Thus,the curves in exhibit 7 rep. floor area. Many of these restaurants experienced a were sing p p resent fully used facilities,which eve were more common high volume of patrons during the late afternoon hours as a result of their lounge facilities. On Saturday, demand accumulated steadily during in this study Peak Unit Demand. The results indicated that the �parking accumulation did not occur consistent) 4 the morning and early afternoon, reaching a single P P g y smooth peak at midafternoon,followed by a slow and on either a weekday or a Saturday. The peak parking • steady decline until the close of business in the late demand ratios varied between 7.2 and 25.8 spaces per 1,000 square feet, with a 90th percentile value of j evening' approximately 20.0 spaces per 1,000 square feet,The wide difference in demand ratios was not related to nom mum differences in the size of the restaurants or regions Unlike office demand,the seasonal parking demand where they were located but appeared to be influenced • for regional retail space varies significantly, present by local market factors. o shared parking. Accumulation. The aggregate parking ac- ing type of opportunity f r s i n'P P g cumulation curves for a weekday and a Saturday are just as differences in the hourly peaking characteris- tics vary among different land uses, so too do the shown in exhibit 9.Both curves reveal that peak actin- characteristics. December is the ity occurred at the noon lunch hour and the evening seasonal peaking dinner hours. On a weekday, demand was more pro- peak month for retail sales and retail parking demand; Y p demand in the remaining months of the year is signifi pounced,caused primarily by employees'driving from candy lower. Based upon annual parking and traffic nearby commercial areas. On both days. the demand data from two shopping centers included in this sur- after 5:00 p.m.was significant and sustained, caused • vey,a conservatively high estimate of the percentage of by a greater volume and lower turnover of patrons at peak parking time of day.king accumulation for each month,relative to Seasonal Variation. Seasonal variations for high- quality is shown in exhibit 8. Retail activity q ty restate ants are significant. Based upon the was not used as a measure of parking demand, be• cause the volume of sales per person also varies annual sales of two restaurants included in the survey, throughout the year, most notably in December. conservative estimates of the percentage of peak sea- sonal parking accumulation for each month are shown 'Wilbur smith ASSOrS2toc,op. LIT. in exhibit 10. Unlike retail sales. per-person restau- rant sales are more constant throughout the year and thus are closely related to relative monthly changes in peak parking demands. EC � dMQtAs Three major suburban cinemas were surveyed.Each has over 900 seats and multiple screens. One cinema • 19 R-96%o 09-09-93 04: 37PM P003 St45 09/09/93 16:41 PAX SEE( ST. PAUL -+44 EAGAN Qb 004/007 I„ f 1 1 • H. It . RESTAURANT/LOUNGE PANG ACCUMULATION• • '' loo :• 'i • • . Z 80 . .. . •_ ' . i 6°•-: ' 1,. !' Li a, 50 -. ;' w i . ',� Q, 40 . r • • i 30 t,, ,. . . A . : r ■ C.) 20 . i, �� ' • w ,, ,, a., i a I; . r• �M'� 1! . II 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 .;. j NOON `— HOUR HOUR OF THE DAY T;. { --- -SATURDAY 3 1 �� provided in-depth analysis of daily attendance for an mand for spaces (as patrons wait for patrons of the . entire year earlier show to depart), depending on the transition ( __„o/ Auk Unit Demand The survey results indicate time between shows,which is typically very short,and 'r ' peak values of approximately 0.25 parking space per the design of the parking facilities. The relative im1 03 SW-f4 seat on a Thursday and 0.30 ear ' space per seoron, pacts of these effects have not been documented,and 4 ki a Friday and Saturday,These results have two signifi• much more detailed study is needed, cant TIPl;fications. First, the cinemas surveyed heal Hourly Accumulation. The hourly parking ac ether two or thre_Scr en.s,which decreases the proba- cumulations relative to the daily peak hour are stabler bi].ity of achieving full seating capacity cimnitarirously and are very sensitive to the relative popularity o• at all screens. Second, each turnover of patrons at certain show times: Exhibit n shows conservative each screen creates congestion and conflicting de- values of hourly demand expressed as a percent of r 20 R■95% 09-09-93 04 : 37PM P004 #45 1 09/09/9 16:41 FAX SEH ST. PAUL .44-4 EAGAN Z005/007 i •�..... EXHIBIT 10 • RESTAURANT/LOUNGE MONTHLY VARIATION IN PEAS. PARKING ACCUMULATION t• 100— : •; r,r4 - 90 .raw,. •�: ,: 4_ ��i ��'j" z ,�-• •'Y��~- tiff Y?u LP., .�_: •�...•i %.' n-p`f i YGr•1♦ i 0 7v �.^_.�. O ��•.•° „�a C IN 9 t �,t� t.' ` ' � _ :c -- -'♦ � •eP7 t,r`i 4.1 w~ V 4 Z Yy. ` `p t ; 4 _ '+.; _,:---==.... ,y +4 t K.t tTT 't �� "( � - to •LL :-- • rr L � y, , L �i r ".. W + : Y ',-~ � -` • - " - . ri �2 -1 ` -4-,,-,..,.)?r" r. - s:* _ 'yy 'L• Y �w 1•• ..+ .•, +i • . rip:• .�•~.Y. :t + , �' - n.....f"'",-;;:11,;...4„.%. r"�: l.: • .'Cy 4,,,,-..-. t S.1 V• J. .7 ff f� 1'�R: . pis.,-,--�t '�a:.o y } �' •'., f:' t om,•-,T✓ y,.�, •may -'•-•=,_'••••s P--^,. .- - , .-i, r.Vii. ` 1 , - i .,tY a a .,.:*.•J f4 .-sit • = ' _Ott.- t ': .-..c;-:_„,`-- ;. ,er'ki' ti �• •T., 7 -i.,;:-...z4 f 1 5-.--.Q,._ ET• .FVF�♦S� ;.i.�-.. .ii'.!..`9 iMty .; i±-' -t.:k ,�•� 10 20--:•._� "� „ ,,-: • K- J,� , • `'I f y . : Y' - , - _•t 0 ff•' - . „ °. -tn e 1' '^t,`.,,` r.•M'f' ) 6-..-•:-.z-N- •.4.• .�:= ..11 i .+ sr .e.. -,,:. ,....,......-...3 Y�;.Y•i.•.% 1,-..F.;--;.--_, r1.••rr1 :a ✓ JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT OV DE of the won peak accumulations for weekdays and Saturdays. Lion periods., and Y day P largest peak occurs in June and July, ive However, cinemas that operate during evening hours followed by a slightly lower post-Christmas peak and im- ,- and only on weekdays would not generate afternoon park- an early fall peak.Based on the year-long survey data. ing demand except on weekends. ezhbit 12 shows an estimate of monthly demand varia- n ac- Seasonal Variation. Cinema parking demand has a lions for a Thursday and a Saturday. The estimated s stable substantial seasonal variation.Even though variations value for each month would be the maximum during are large, cinemas featuring the most currently re- that month. The exception would be the last week in .rity of leased films follow a more or less predictable pattern. December, which is more characteristic of the month cent of Three seasonal peaks tend to occur corresponding to of January than pre-Christmas December. the seasons of new film releases and students' vacs- . g-95% 09-09-93 04:37PM P005 #45 09/09/93 16:42 FAT SEE ST. PAUL --# EAGAN X1006/007 I EXH BIT 11 CINEMA PARSING ACCUMULATION 100 • ' i� • t k. . 90 +i t • ••..::i.,..,:.,.._.:d ' ' .. 47. ' - ts‘, ‘..:4 • • ! , 5 . . . i ; . : .. . . w i 0 0 30 i . W • a 1= •10 0 G I I I l I 1 I I I 1 I 1 f I I 1 I- 12 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 1.2 , 7 8 9 10 11 �. '! NOON 80UF OF THE DAY ., NQ fE: THE LEFT HALF OF 11 E WEEKDAY C1.1�YE. �1�SATIIRAAI' WOULD NOT APPLY AT CINEMAS NOT • SIAvr[o WEEIDAY AFTERNOON SHOWS .t '1 r�!eat _^!"V'7r-r1:9 Uy,1•.••":11-'47G�J+ •:•. .s, + i il•111 • ••'.,: ...^t`• ^.�•-...` � .�`..•�•. :. �Aln7��/:��."I. •.�• Il'... 1 i : :7,:1;;i .Y-1.:& r:4*sa-•:.Y{ iA'%W". **ayy .. ,1y :.'��. ��� i�i:Y�.Y .�Y. is f 1 ir. • 1 •,'' • 22 2 ii R-95% J 09-09-93 04 : 37PM P006 #45 09/09/93 16:43 FAX SEE ST. PAUL -0-.4 EAGAN Z007/007 • I A , •■ r t mlmilh ..!. 1 .' MD= 12 • ...- . CINEMA MONTHLY VARIATION IN PEAK PARKING ACCUMULATION .• 15 c 4,‘4-1\61 .. • 6 ; 100-s .....mkel :....7:7-.1: .'...',.■; .j..C..4" \' ..1 A.; '4:4...• 't.,',4i r.' ..4. :-..."...f..• ,4 ,...Z1.-; 4.)611 4, • 90 ...:,..„-..,-,,.T,.....÷..I..z.-..Z,...„.Z..,, :. - - .....-.' •--.'•7i..•..,--'7..-..-.:-.-, * 80 ,:-- • - 7 k0 114 6r. 4A V v Vk,). •Ivi.t 0r"4f v0-1- .• ''... , • ‘ % '..'41;1' .-*-1:41-r- •.7 [..1 .1719..e. i11•5=:-; 4 z .• .__•,, • ft, , . \I ci. 70-.._... ...• ..... ...... . •..,, ••.,....,...,.. . ..• .. . : ..,..:. ,•„. ....,..., Veld ,,,,idr .., .--- e- • - . * .5. ,'.....• .. . .Jtir.„,j.1 '''•:C1--,e110- :'i....i.f,w61: ...,.4..4,14). . .• • I .1A°1111:11.1114. \Pitj-VV°S • -... .:J — '.- .‘r i ' •. ... .-.4!-,^r..”. -•- r ..1......twz.. —::, ..- . -.- J%....-,',,, - p..., . •1 lig.■ -• , . . . . 0 - . . . -., , .....,,... .,,, .... „..-t: ....,;:-..., ..- . . I ..... .4. . .•. 7,7...m54. .:lie...."...... 4..........• ....Z.:41,.: f::•..t.4 .• . , et••■••=, .'..-..*,._..... -.. % 4.; ''•W. •..4.•A. - .••: , - . ..,...e....:■ ......... .. •••.•114... .ye •:;..e. •-..;..0 0 : 4.. 1•J -IN 4 4:,- •• ,--r ,.---e . i_.(.. i -, ,,, :-:.-14,..,..- .-,.1...-z. .- , -,..-:q.I -.P.....4. _, •:, .-ets ----tr- .It -x.-••••iite: . • .- •.r.sefs' .:•••.4. ^.--:•.• -•;:q.4ex. 41. ! .1::.•.:-.,v itt Or, 40- . --.:..:.... • .-.rpoz,- :-.4,-0,111 :14.-7/... -47.--z4-3,. t.....,.. , • -....,, ..... ......._,.....„ _,..z,-..y:• • ....-:„. !..1 Jr.o.:-. :0..1...Z, 'so. %NI ....•ea.1: '0: ..-- "'";:ii".%";?. •-•744"Z•er *:!•44. v.:;,%:,i•1, -,;=....tv4. ..-.5F-4.2? . .....•: ig ..1.14',*•,,,-,,k •-:-.*-...- .• ..,... ,,,-, ...,,......: ..,..:.•. ,,,,, :,,....vr 3,...• .,,I.,.....- •••,,,..,.._ •,:.....or, •,,g.-..4.... ---I..e.. -..4,:- ••":10°Pr •...."-4.4. :43.vriZi".1..• ' r.X1 ,.-..4*I.4. • 1 -.4,0r: 4:•••;..eir4:' --:.;:i..i.I1,4 -;,.1,`-.4: 'oni..?'•-•::. :••:r.sa.:.: -,..trit -".:3 -.... reAes:** • :.•i2..-1..2% ';,,,:.--,-,,41,-,-• '7_71,4.. --. ...4.4 ,--414 w- -I-'KV-1 :e'- 41 il . i 4 30- ...,.....rg . . -;74:,14.. ra,...ori it.-Zeit.: 'f'.+:■.,.4 -;Witt?'-' .-.;l'ir•i': ."'...tak; ;.i.14.itt i:'.17-g...e.' ';-.1....1.4:: ........V**. :::....,.4" '%741.•V.:: •.,'`..,Afel ..-1-:.1:• '..e.....''''..A.0. ...04.■ N••••..2.16. '''1.-trel. .2..1".,47.rer- --.47-•"..... ;-,-,....... ',.^.43,5.1.it ;• til,"' <111,-`clkie ...1.V. 41riraz, ',..r."70p,r, -'-:.':,;-,Z..0. :----•:.-.1r40. .---Zifs.eg. r',....- ,.. ;•-•%%Ay- -45...PI,. o '.-si• .4 Ll'I'"'"" :-.T.124.4:: :IA'u1.4-: ...;f4 : ..: o: 4, 0. : :vv4..f..! .,..=... 't. 12 :;-: •. ...:011ATE. -;!%, ,, .•..:-,,,r,s- z-z...v•-•.-4- !..172,44: -CZ :-;:r"1-: 1;4 '-... Al:4- ..t.-tke-1%. ,'1"...i-'4:4-' -4..r.tnezi; r...- r...;:! ,-:..-sw- tr 20- , --s..-kra ..„,,r_......, ,..., ,,..., ...-,z-.e.. 7 ■••17., :3•Ets. .,_........_:. .;:akt,g. ,,,,2#1.-Z..„ -.4-,A. 4,1-,...--- •••!. itIii.-- ..,- p•-•:4-r•' , ."-.44.2";7.- -.:7;-qAt. .41:••WO;•• -''•=0*--• :ii<Ira ■.4.3;ititT vi::' .r. s,1...--,,,.--. -0 ;-?1.,...,::.+,;:''. • ;,-: 111/4-... :-V.,.. It. -,4,110‘,P4. ..7.-v, •:,;,!-^,-4::„.-0:- .,;,414,1 g„..4 -.-C2....1., r4..:.: sr•-, . t,-7.2. .e i...,,,.",. :.':-.'-''•,::-...!! . - ,:"/' -..V: 1:ZIA .-;-.-"V '-*F.. "TA0 '..-31.40,,..,7i ...T,›It,..-.,,.: .... .. • feet,,,,,r117i, f '-,T.,:---%',, ?•=1:,, ::.-T-1 :_,- -. *.N. . ' .7.1; - :VAite!. ni.•...*;-0 -titiii-,-; •7‘.",,,---k. ' 4" '.- ii," ' '...."......".''' :UNE " — '2.‘ ,. -'4.2 • - ' -.• -Vr% 4-..ika... ......'A.A.; .... '4,100:. t.s..:.A.: : 'AI :,•■•-■::"..:•?' • -f;i:'4:f «SI., • 7„:ferivi, -st' -'t l'*•'•(4.,.*_ .4.:-....:0:-.:! -1.!...,••:,., -:..!,-...A.:, -, *-• :tr.,t_.! 10- . -.4 -..;17.4.; $04... .,..-e lArr. ,-4kAe. 'AMNIC:- 7.-1:71 , :If:;"' ,%.'i:•',..T. 4:1.,..:•:',4 urs •;.‘" -., , .....:. 4,... ,,,,,•,,,,..; .i.e, 0-.:. r,...., ..e.. .,,-,..... ..,,„e.,,,,,,r„,,-, ,f,.,„.., ,_.,,„,,,,...,. ''. ..1•1. '.. . ...1:4;0`11' ....,C, c; •'../**,i; 4a .',1..., X.:547.9,,,...' ,:i tirq't r v....x-1 .,%:::-;.?;..4 1, . , _..,.,:„. ..:,..„ ....: .."...V4.7, ....1-M. .1..'''''4,.., . t. "..-•'. ir 4;44., \..-,, ..,'. •"":■ • ti-4,.:,..-,.' -,,,• • ., Ineol •_._ : ......m.v,.. ....-••,,,c,,.... -....q,„- ..... •:.:. ....:314 .-,,,,...,...k.,. • ,.;,...r. .-....0.,.-A-9 c „,:i 'ftg .Ae ZS'--''. .•74),,..r7--"i: Y:ria• :;:i;,2-4 r- aigic Zr. ZSI . 7,q r '.5 ''' '''''.1 „.4 ... JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC •• EMS'WEEKDAY r-----1 FRIDAY/SATURDAY • • • . . . . R-95% • . .... 09-09-93 04 : 37P1.1 P007 #45 r MEMO __city ea of an 9 TO: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL C/O THOMAS L. HEDGES, CITY ADMINISTRATOR FROM: THOMAS A. COLBERT, DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS SEPTEMBER 15 DATE: 15, 1993 SUBJECT: TOWN CENTRE 100-12TH ADDITION (MANN THEATERS) REVIEW OF REVISED SITE PLAN (9-14-93) On this date, I have received a copy of the Traffic Analysis Memo dated September 15 from Benshoof & Associates, along with a revised site plan and landscape plan from Vanney Associates dated September 14 and a revised site grading plan and utility plan, both dated September 14 from McCombs Frank Roos & Associates as it pertains to the above referenced development proposal. These revised plans have addressed many of the concerns identified in the staff report dated July 20, 1993 that was forwarded to the Planning Commission and City Council previously. Therefore, the following comments relate to residual concerns either not addressed since the original report or result from the subsequent revised plan submittal. GRADING AND DRAINAGE Ponding Requirements Pond DP-20 located in the east central portion of this development requires 8.0 acre feet of storage capacity while maintaining its normal water level (NWL) elevation of 901 and limiting the 100 year high water level (HWL) to 904.2. As of this date, neither the architect nor the engineer could verify whether this storage volume is being provided with the revised grading plan. This could have an impact on the final site plan and parking stall numbers if additional surface area is necessary. Drainage There presently exists a 36" storm sewer that drains to Pond DP-20 from Town Centre Drive in the southeast corner of this development. This storm sewer outlet is presently located too close to the pond outlet minimizing the benefits of proposed water quality treatment requirements of this proposal. Therefore,the 36" storm sewer outlet from Town Centre Drive must be aligned to the low point catch basin for the southeast portion of the parking lot and their outlets combined. Page Two September 15, 1993 No storm sewer outlets have been provided for the future development of the proposed restaurant sites. This storm sewer must be properly designed, located on the final site plan approvals, and installed with this development due to the extensive retaining walls around the perimeter of the wetland. Grading Although recommended in the original staff report, the revised grading plans do not show grading of the residual property adjacent to Yankee Doodle Road (future restaurant sites). It is strongly recommended that the rough grading to future proposed elevations be performed with this development approval. This is necessary to define the drainage basins conveying runoff to the proposed storm sewer outlets draining into Pond DP-20. Adequate erosion control measures must be provided for the entire site both during construction and after completion to eliminate erosion into Pond DP-20. UTILITIES The revised Utility Plan still did not address the need to provide the future restaurant pad sites with sanitary sewer or watermain. This must be designed and installed with this development. TRAFFIC ACCESS AND CIRCULATION Access With the revised plans providing for the major and secondary entrance opposite Town Centre Drive and the Town Centre Shoppes driveway respectively, many of the original concerns have been adequately addressed. To provide adequate site clearance to the south on Town Centre Drive the landscaping plan should be revised to ensure that no landscaping berms or plant material shall be placed in the 20' parking lot setback from the south entrance access drive to a point on the Town Centre Drive right-of-way line directly south of the east building line of the movie theater (adjacent to the curve on Town Centre Drive). Site Plan Layout/Circulation The parking island separating the row of parking stalls between the two theater entrances should be increased by eliminating one parking stall on each end to provide a wider pedestrian sidewalk from the street to the internal parking lot. The dedicated internal driving island located immediately north of the movie theater should be narrowed to allow the row of parking stalls to be shifted northeast (approximately 5-7 feet) away from the wetland thereby minimizing its encroachment. It is anticipated that at most two parking stalls would be lost. Page Three September 15, 1993 Pedestrian Sidewalks and Crosswalks The installation of painted crosswalks at the Town Centre Drive/Yankee Place intersection and the south theater entrance along with adequate identification and advanced warning signs helps to address the concern regarding pedestrian crossing of these four lane public streets. However, the proposed sidewalk from the Town Centre Shoppes should be relocated to the center of the current landscaped island providing more visible and direct access for pedestrians from this parking lot to the crosswalks at the corner of Town Ce ntr e Drive and Yankee Place. In addition, a boulevard sidewalk should be extended north from Town Centre Drive along the west side of Yankee Place to the e xit drive sidewalk connection of the bank and a s de d e from the bank parking lot in the northwest corner of Town Centre Drive and Yankee Place to this boulevard sidewalk extension. There will be no disturbance of existing landscaping necessary by this sidewalk addition. Also, additional painted crosswalks should be provided across the internal dedicated parking drive for the restaurant sites immediately north of the theater's main entrance and north side exit door. Although the traffic analysis report identified traffic generation and distribution projections, it did not identify the anticipated number and frequency of pedestrian crossings at this location. It is anticipated that a significant number of theater patrons will use the Town Centre Shops for parking due to the convenience of the proposed sidewalks and proximity to the theater entrance. There is not a specific quantifiable number that would eliminate the need for the proposed crosswalks nor justify further traffic control measures that couldn't be addressed by the City at a later date as may be warranted. It is imperative that a Maintenance Agreement be entered into requiring the developer or his agent to maintain all of these referenced sidewalks twelve months of the year through all weather conditions. RIGHT-OF-WAY/EASEMENTS/PERMITS Right-of-Way If the additional 15' of right-of-way required for Yankee Doodle Road is not dedicated with this plat, the Eagan Heights Commercial Park P.U.D. should be amended to ensure its dedication with the subsequent platting of this residual outlot. 1 L..k? U Page Four September 15, 1993 Easements The final plat shall describe and dedicate a ponding easement to the HWL for Pond DP- 20. The retaining walls must be located outside of this ponding easement and the maintenance obligation must be defined as the responsibility of the developer and/or his agents for problems that result from fluctuating water elevations of the storm water pond. The final approval must be contingent upon the conveyance of a restricted access easement along Yankee Place from Yankee Doodle Road to the Town Centre Drive entrance. Cross easements must be provided over the internal dedicated driving aisle from Town Centre Drive/Yankee Place to the residual developed outlot (future restaurant pads) to ensure adequate public access. Permits This development shall be responsible for ensuring that all regulatory agency permits are acquired and their conditions complied with prior to the final plat approval. SUMMARY The following conditions should be attached to any final approval based on the reference site plans. 1. The development will be responsible for maintaing a minimum of 8.0 acre feet of pond storage volume between the NWL and the HWL in Pond DP-20. 2. The grading plan for this development shall include emergency overland outlets to Pond DP-20 no higher than 15" above the low points on Town Centre Drive. 3. A storm sewer stub shall be provided to serve the 2.0 acre residual undeveloped property to the north. 4. The utility plan shall include a minimum 8" sanitary sewer and 6" watermain stub to the residual undeveloped property to the north. 5. The existing 36" storm sewer outfall from Town Centre Drive to Pond DP-20 shall be realigned and connected to the parking lot low point outlet approximately 125' west of the east property line. 6. No landscaping shall be installed in the boulevard or setback area of Town Centre Drive from the south entrance drive southeasterly to a point in line with the east building line of the movie theater. Page Five September 15, 1993 7. A Maintenance Agreement shall be prepared and recorded against the property addressing the all-season maintenance requirements of the sidewalks feeding the pedestrian crosswalks and retaining walls adjacent to Pond DP-20 with a foundation elevation less than 904.0. 8. Pedestrian crosswalks with required identification and advance warning signs shall be installed as directed by the City. 9. Additional sidewalks to the Town Centre Shoppes and along the west side of Yankee Place north of Town Centre Drive shall be installed with this development. 10. 15' of public right-of-way shall be conveyed along Yankee Doodle Road with this plat or the P.U.D. Agreement amended to provide for future dedication with subsequent platting. 11. A restricted access easement shall be conveyed adjacent to Yankee Place from Town Centre Drive to Yankee Doodle Road. 12. An internal access easement shall be dedicated from the Town Centre Drive/Yankee Place intersection to the residual outlot (future restaurant sites). Respectfully submitted, Thomas A. Colbert cc: Peggy Reichert, Community Development Director Mike Foertsch, Assistant City Engineer TAC/je EAGAN MRINT. FRC . TEL :612-681-4360 Sep 16 93 13 :08 No .003 P.02 • TO: JON IiOHENSTEIN ASSISTANT TO THE CITY ADMINISTRATION FROM: RICH BRASCH WATER RESOURCES COORDINATOR RE: COMMENTS ON REVISED SITE PLAN FOR EAGAN THEATER PROPOSAL- MANN THEATER COMPANY DATE: SEPTEMBER 16, 1993 I've quickly reviewed the above referenced project and have recorded my comments below. They are as follows: 1. The developer has apparently decreased the proposed wetland fill from .4 acres down to .2 acres by re- positioning the building and use of retaining walls. In addition, there does not appear to be any encroachment below the normal water level of the pond. However, there are several vertical drops where installation of the trail causes the 902 contour to be pushed out into the pond. These slopes should be flattened to no more than 5:1, stabilized, and re-vegetated or more short retaining walls should be installed. The former action will, of course, increase slightly the amount of wetland fill. 2. If the Council believes that expanding parking to the north of the proposed development is not a viable option for further reducing wetland filling, it appears that the developer has done as much as can reasonably be expected within the limits of the development to mitigate regulated wetland impacts under the Wetlands Conservation Act. 3. The plan to re-establish and manage vegetation around the pond is unclear. I would strongly recommend that areas between the trail and the pond be seeded with a wet prairie mix (not turf grass) and that the shrub/woodland vegetation mimic what's around the remainder of the pond, if possible. Maintenance of the vegetation between the pond-ward edge of the trail and the pond edge should be kept to a minimum to preserve aesthetic and wildlife values. 4. The developer will need to submit a plan to replace the filled wetland area on an acre-for-acre basis, assuming the preliminary plat is approved by December 15, 1993. The wetland replacement plan is generally reviewed by staff prior to preliminary plat approval and approved at the same time as the preliminary plat, could make it a condition of preliminary plat approval. The developer and I have already discussed several 3 A=97% j4 612 681 4360 09-16-93 01 : 11PM P002 #15 options involving land adjacent to O'Leary Pond. 5 . The developer has agreed to meet his water quality pending requirement by excavating Pond DP-20. An excavation plan will need to be submitted for the pond, although this again could be attached as a condition of plat approval. Please contact me if you have any questions. R ch Bresch Water Resources Coordinator cc. Shannon Tyree t144 R-97% 612 681 4360 09-16-93 01 : 11PM P003 #15 LI# ZOOd ➢QdSZ :ZO C6-91-60 09£17 189 Z19 %L6=01 city of eagan MEMO TO: JON HOHENSTEIN, ASSISTANT TO THE CITY ADMINISTRATOR FROM: JOHN K. VONDELINDE, SUPERINTENDENT OF PARKS DATE: SEPTEMBER 16, 1993 SUBJECT: TOWN CENTER 100 - 12TH ADDITION, MANN THEA 1 RS, INC. - TREE PRESERVATION At your request, I have reviewed the latest set of plans submitted in reference to the proposed Town Center 100 - 12th Addition, Mann Theater Development. As you. may recall, the Advisory Parks, Recreation, and Natural Resources Commission recommended at their August 5, 1993 meeting that the developer of this site fully comply with the Eagan Tree Preservation Guidelines and that all significant trees and significant woodlands be identified on the grading plan. The plans that have been forwarded for my review are not in compliance with the Eagan Tree Preservation Guidelines. While the grading plan does identify the general perimeter of the woodlands along the edge of Pond DP-20, it does not specifically identify significant trees or significant woodlands. Consequently,lacking this information, it is not possible for staff, at this time, to understand in specific terms what the impact of the proposed development will have on the existing woodland resources;determine what measures the developer should be required to institute in order to preserve existing woodland resources; and to establish a plan to mitigate tree loss through compliance with the Tree Replacement Guidelines. If it is the desire of City Council to require that a full Tree Preservation Plan be submitted as part of the review requirements for this site, then a Tree Preservation Plan overlay on the grading plan will need to be prepared before staff can offer any further comments relative to compliance/non-compliance with the Tree Preservation Guidelines. Lacking a Tree Preservation Plan, I did have an opportunity to walk a portion of the site to examine the woodland resources in the context of the intent and objectives of the Tree Preservation Guidelines. Based on my observations, it does appear that there are a small number of trees on the site which meet the definition of significant trees and pockets of woodland areas representative of significant woodlands (as defined in the Tree Preservation Guidelines). One of the most impressive features of the existing woodland is that it envelopes a large portion of the wetland edge within the proposed Mann Theater Page 1 of 3 ZO' d 1700' oN ZZ : t7T £6 9T daS 09£t7-T89-ZT9: 131 ' Od.d ' INI3W NdJd_ L13; COOd Nd9Z :ZO £6-91-60 09£h 189 Z19 %L6•0:1 • Development. The mix of existing native trees and other riparian vegetation provides an ideal ecological system for the nesting and propagation of waterfowl, songbirds, and other wetland species. Based on the grading plans and landscaping plans submitted, it would appear that the majority of the existing woodland mass and edge vegetation will be removed as a result of the proposed site grading and development. Reflected on the landscape plan is the proposed installation of 13 non-native Niobe Weeping Willows to be placed along the edge of the wetland between the proposed retaining wall and pond proper. These trees, when mature, will offer some attendant benefits to the pond wildlife and songbirds, but will not came close to re-establishing the mix or concentration of trees which currently exist along the edge of the pond. Further, the re-establishment of a maintained cultured turf grass edge will only further reduce the amount of natural habitat which the pond currently supports and create a dissonance with the more naturalized wetland edge which currently exists on the Blue Cross/Blue Shield property directly to the east. After making my analysis, I spoke with Duane Engel from Vanney Associates to relay my concerns relative to the current grading and landscaping plans for the site. I mentioned to him that from a perspective of tree resource preservation and wildlife habitat retention,that alternatives should be explored to better preserve and re-create the natural plant community which occurs on the existing wetland edge. Specifically,I suggested the following measures: First, that attempts be made to preserve as much of the existing vegetation as possible during the grading process, including the erection of construction fence around woodland vegetation to be saved. Second, I recommended that the balance of the disturbed wetland edge be revegetated in a natural seed mix which is more reflective of the existing riparian vegetation (as opposed to a high maintenance cultured bluegrass variety). Third, he and I discussed possibility of introducing pockets of native lowland tree vegetation, in lieu of the weeping willows, for the purpose of re-creating a more natural mix of wetland species capable.of supporting a greater variety of wildlife and songbirds. As currently proposed, the Niobe Willows will give the appearance of a much more ornamental monoculture style planting,which is out of character with the type of vegetation the pond currently supports, including the trees within the Blue Cross/Blue Shield property. Finally, we also discussed and he agreed that the mow line between the edge of the proposed sidewalk and the pond itself be minimized to the greatest extent possible in order to preserve the greatest amount of re-created wetland vegetation. As you are aware, the City has been promoting the concept of an unmaintained buffer strip around all lakes and ponds in the community as a way of enhancing the scenic and wildlife value of ponds, while at the same time serving as a natural edge for absorbing nutrient and chemical runoff from adjacent yards and parking lots. Page 2of3 20' d 1700' 0N 2Z: VT 26 91 deS 092t►-189-ZT9: 131 ' Did ' 1NIdW Nd9d= LI# b00d ➢Qd93 .Z0 C6-91-60 09C' 189 Z19 9%L6=21 In conclusion, if the above four measures are executed by the developer in the landscaping of the site, I believe that the character, purpose, and function of the resulting woodland edge would be more reasonably consistent with the intent and objectives of the City's existing Tree Preservation Guidelines, If I can offer further assistance or answer any questions that you may have,please feel free to contact me at Ext. 316. 11 ' Jo `/onDcL inde Su i erintendent of Parks V/cm cc: Ken Vraa, Director of Parks and Recreation Peggy Reichart, Community Development Director Jim Sturm, City Planner Page3of3 b0' d . o da _ _ . b00 N i_Z• bT �6 9T S 09� T89 ZT9' X31 add 1NIdW Nd9d_ 4), A! { MEMO .—city of eagan TO: PEGGY REICHERT, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR FROM: SHANNON TYREE, PROJECT PLANNER DATE: SEPTEMBER 17, 1993 SUBJECT: MANN THEATER PROPOSAL After your request for supplemental information, I contacted the Community Development, Department at the City of Burnsville. They provided me with staff reports for requested restaurants, as well as parking code requirements. Burnsville's parking requirements for restaurants (class I) are 1 stall per each 3 seats or 1 stall per each 100 square feet of net floor area, plus an additional stall for each employee at peak shifts, whichever is greater. Parking for a bar/tavern/night club is 1 space per 50 square feet of net floor area. Stall size is 9' x18'. Olive Garden, Bakers Square, and Red Lobster are all located within planned unit developments. Bakers Square and Red Lobster were developed in 1978 and Olive Garden in 1990. The staff reports did not detail seating capacities; however, each report, listed the size of site, building size or building coverage, as well as parking number. Acreage Square feet Parking required Parking provided. Olive Garden 1.85 9,100 125 130 Bakers Square Not available 4,800 36 89 Red Lobster 1.30 7,266 Not available 66 The staff reports do reflect that all the restaurants meet or exceed parking requirement: standards. If you require additional information, please advise. Project Planner ST/mgt \A.q SUBJECT: VARIANCE, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT, & PRELIMINARY PLAT (TOWN CENTRE 100 12TH) APPLICANT: MANN THEATRE, INC. LOCATION: OUTLOT G, TOWN CENTRE 100 1ST ADDITION EXISTING ZONING: (PD-CSC)PLANNED DEVELOPMENT-COMMUNITY SHOPPING CENTER DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: JULY 27, 1993 DATE OF REPORT: JULY 20, 1993 COMPILED BY: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT APPLICATION SUMMARY: Separate applications have been submitted requesting a Preliminary Plat consisting of one lot for a movie theater, a Conditional Use Permit to allow a pylon sign, and a Variance of 143 less parking stalls. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This site is located within the Eagan Heights Commercial Park Planned Development south of Yankee Doodle Road, east of Yankee Place and Town Centre Drive, north of Town Centre Drive, and east of Town Centre 100 and Town Centre 100 9th Additions. The surrounding property is zoned Planned Development. The Land Use Guide Plan designates this site,as well as the surrounding properties,CPD (Commercial Planned Development). The site is mostly an open grassy field sloping down toward Pond DP-20 along the easterly property line. There is a stand of trees located around the pond; it appears most of which will be, lost during grading. PROPOSAL COMMENTS: The Mann Theater group is proposing an eight screen movie theater (approximately 24,978 sq. ft. building) with seating space of 1,648 sq. ft. The proposed building material is a pattern on precast wall panels. The decorative precast wall panels have diamond shapes with accent bands. The marquis and front doors are located on the west side of the building. During staff review a drop off/pick up area in front of the main doors was discussed to allow drop off/pick up to occur without pedestrian/car conflict. The trash/recycling enclosure is located on the east side of the building and made of the same materials. As proposed, the building meets setback and area requirements. The proposed lot area is 289,547 sq. ft. or 6.64 acres. The ponding easement for DP-20 is 80,990 sq. ft. or 1.85 acres for a net total of 208,557 sq. ft. or 4.78 acres. The plat submitted does not include the northern 180' of Outlot G, Town Centre 100 1st Addition. The portion of Outlot G along Yankee Doodle Road has not been included, though the applicant is showing a sign easement to have off-site signage located on this portion. After reviewing this plat, the City is requiring the remaining portion of Outlot G be platted as Outlot A, Town Centre 100 12th Addition. A concept plan was submitted indicating potential building pads and parking areas. Staff has concerns with the concept plan as it does not take into account the additional 15' of dedicated right-of-way which will be required by Dakota County. This right-of-way dedication will force the shift of the conceptual plan 15'to the south, adversely impacting Mann Theaters'proposed layout. The concept plan also shows the only ingress/egress points into these future lots through the Mann Theaters parking lot. These and more questions will need to be worked out due to the interrelatedness of the entire site. According to City Code, 549 parking stalls would be required, one parking stall for three seats. The applicant is requesting a Variance to the City Code reducing the number of parking spaces by 143 or one parking space per 4.06 seats. The City Code allows the Council to consider variances where "practical difficulties or particular hardships result from carrying out the strict letter of the regulations." A hardship may not be self-imposed or purely economic in nature. The applicant has stated the following reasons for the variance request: 1. A one to four parking ratio is more than adequate parking for a theater as a practical matter. None of our existing theaters have parking in excess of a one to four ratio, and we do not experience a parking problem. 2. The cost of acquiring and improving the land required to meet a one to three parking ratio is prohibitive and significantly adversely affects the economics of constructing a free-standing theater. The developer is also requesting nine foot stall widths; City's standard is to require 10' wide stalls. This one foot reduction is an overall reduction of 40 stalls. Without the deviation for the stall width, this increases the total number of deficit parking spaces to 183. If the variances are not approved, the proposed site is not large enough to accommodate this proposal. Three access points have been proposed; two are located along Town Centre Drive and the northernmost one is on Yankee Place. It is staffs recommendation that this access point line up with the intersecting Town Centre Drive. The southern access should also line up with the one across the street. The Town Centre Pylon Sign Agreement provided for a pylon sign 300' from the southeast intersection of Yankee Doodle Road and Yankee Place. Exhibit "A" of the sign agreement shows one pylon sign for the entire Outlot G as the concept plan indicated one use for the entire lot. It appears from the concept plan most recently submitted, it is the intention of the property owner to divide this into three lots (Mann Theaters and two buildings to the north). A Conditional Use Permit has been applied for to allow an off-site,joint-user, pylon sign in a 15' x 15' sign easement at the southeast corner of Yankee Doodle Road and Yankee Place. This is an amendment to the Pylon Sign Agreement. In addition, the applicant is requesting a Variance of 60 sq. ft. to allow the sign to exceed the maximum sign area of 125 sq. ft. to 185 sq. ft. The most recent concept plan did not indicate any future pylon or ground sign locations although they are typically associated with freestanding uses such as are shown in the concept plan. The building-mounted sign will be in the form of an illuminated reader board with chasing lights-marquis. The chasing lights need to be intermittent to appear to be chasing. The City Code expressly prohibits intermittent or flashing lights except intermittent display of time and temperature. The landscape plan shows a mix of overstory and understory trees consistent with the Town Centre area. SUMMARY: The following issues need to be addressed by the Advisory Planning Commission and City Council: o A Variance of 143 fewer parking spaces than the 549 required by City Code. o To allow 9' stalls rather than the 10' standard. To allow only a portion of Outlot G, Town Centre 100 1st Addition, to be platted. To permit the northernmost access point to not match center line of the Town Centre Drive and Yankee Place intersection. To allow .4 acre of the wetland associated with Pond DP-20 to be filled. • To allow an off-site pylon sign, not designated for the corner lot, to be permitted and to allow a 15' x 15' sign easement for this pylon location. o An increase in the allowable square footage for a pylon sign from 125 sq. ft. to 185 sq. ft. • To permit chasing lights on the illuminated reader board (marquis) - not allowed by Code. o To permit access to the two northern conceptual uses to occur through the theater parking lot rather than by a public access. 5l GRADING/DRAINAGE/EROSION CONTROL: This site was previously rough-graded in the mid-1980's to prepare the area for development. The site contains Pond DP-20 along the east property line and the pond has a row of trees along the edge of it. The remaining portions of the site contain grasses and open field. A preliminary grading plan submitted with this application shows a maximum cut of 10' in the northwest corner of the site and a maximum fill of 6' along the edge of Pond DP-20. A majority of the trees located on this site will be removed during the grading of this site. The grading plan shows that a strip of approximately 50' of wetland along the west edge of Pond DP-20 will be filled. As shown on the preliminary grading plan, the parking lot shall direct its storm water runoff to an internal storm sewer system that will discharge directly into Pond DP-20. Pond DP-20 is included on the City's Comprehensive Storm Water Management Plan and has a 12" outlet that drains to the south to O'Leary Lake (Pond DP-7). The preliminary layout shows that a new driveway will be constructed in the southeast corner of the site that will connect to Town Centre Drive where an existing catch basin is located. If the new driveway is built where the existing catch basin is located then the developer shall add a new catch basin on the west side of the driveway at the connection to Town Centre Drive. The intersection of Town Centre Drive and Yankee Place is a low point and the emergency overland outlet shall be provided from this intersection to Pond DP-20. The high point of the emergency overland outlet shall be no higher than elevation 909.6. The low point of Town Centre Drive at the southeast corner of this site shall also have an emergency overland outlet to the north across this site to Pond DP-20. The maximum elevation of the emergency overland outlet shall be 908.2. These emergency overland outlets will allow a maximum of 18" of ponding in the street during the 100 year rainfall event. The preliminary grading plan shows that grading will occur on the residual undeveloped property to the north of this development (Outlot G). City staff recommends that the developer grade the residual undeveloped property to the north to the future grades with this development. Then the volume of dirt could be balanced for the two sites. Before any grading can occur on the adjacent property, written permission shall be obtained and submitted with the grading permit or final plat application. The storm sewer layout for this development shall include a storm sewer stub properly designed to serve the remaining property to the north of this site up to Yankee Doodle Road. The area to the north is approximately 2.0 acres and the area is designed to be drained to Pond DP-20. As shown on the preliminary grading plan,the developer proposes to add fill within the high water level of Pond DP-20 and this will result in a decrease in the available pond storage volume. With the drainage area of 31.5 acres of commercially zoned development draining to Pond DP-20, the pond shall provide a pond storage volume of 8.0 acre feet to meet the 100 year rainfall event. The development will be responsible for installing and maintaining erosion control measures in accordance with the City's Erosion/Sediment Control Manual. The development shall provide a 30' buffer strip along the edge of Pond DP-20 to help prevent erosion into the pond. The buffer strip shall be measured from the normal water level of the pond. WATER QUALITY: This proposed development lies in drainage basin D and would discharge stormwater runoff to Pond DP-20, a pond classified as a nutrient basin in the City's water quality management plan. Pond DP-20 then discharges to O'Leary Pond, a small lake classified to support indirect contact recreation. Because of the proximity to a recreational classified water body, on-site ponding will be recommended to meet runoff treatment requirements for this development. The developer has agreed to modify Pond DP-20 to meet treatment obligations rather than excavate an additional pond on the site. Staff will recommend that the developer excavate Pond DP-20 to create approximately 0.8 acre-feet more wet volume in the pond in order to meet treatment obligations for this parcel. The only wetland on the site is that associated with Pond DP-20. The developer's consultant has delineated the wetland and the delineation will be recommended for approval by staff. The developer proposes to fill approximately 0.4 acres of the wetland as part of this project. Staff recommends against approving of filling of the wetland, since expansion into the vacant parcel to the north or east (which is currently owned by the developer) appears to be a reasonable option for avoiding/minimizing the area of the wetland filled. If the City decides to allow the proposed fill, the Wetland Conservation Act requires that the area of the wetland filled be replaced on an acre-for-acre basis. The developer will therefore need to submit a wetland replacement plan to the City for approval. In addition, the developer should be required to make up by excavation in Pond DP-20 any wet pond volume in Pond DP-20 lost due to filling. This excavation would be in addition to that required for water quality treatment. These recommendations are subject to approval by the Advisory Parks, Recreation, and Natural Resources Commission. UTILITIES: Sanitary sewer of sufficient size, capacity and depth has been stubbed to this property from Town Centre Drive. An existing 6" sewer service has been stubbed to the property and the preliminary utility plan shows extending the 6"line up to the building. The development shall add a manhole on the sanitary sewer service at the connection to the existing 6" stub. Watermain of sufficient size, capacity and pressure has been provided in Town Centre Drive„ The existing 12" watermain in Town Centre Drive includes two 6" watermain stubs to this development. The preliminary utility plan shows connecting to one of the 6" �3 watermain stubs and extending water up to the building and also to a hydrant on the east edge of the building. The existing hydrants on Town Centre Drive plus the proposed hydrant on the east edge of the building will provide adequate fire protection to this development. The preliminary utility plan submitted with this application does not show how sanitary sewer and water would be provided to the residual property north of the proposed site.This development will be responsible for providing an 8" sanitary sewer and 6" watermain stub to this undeveloped parcel. STREETS/ACCESS/CIRCULATION: The preliminary site plan proposes three driveways to be constructed out to Town Centre Drive or Yankee Place. The driveway connections to the public streets shall include concrete aprons built to City standards. Outlot G, Town Centre 100 1st Addition is bounded on the north by Yankee Doodle Road, and on the west and south by Yankee Place and Town Centre Drive. With the initial platting of the Town Centre 100 Addition, restricted access was dedicated to Dakota County along the entire frontage of Yankee Doodle Road. The initial platting of the Town Centre 100 Addition also provided for an 80' right-of-way width for Yankee Place north of its intersection with Town Centre Drive and a 66' right-of- way for Town Centre Drive southerly and easterly of the Town Centre Drive, Yankee Place intersection. The 80' right-of-way dedication on Yankee Place was provided in anticipation of the extension of Yankee Place northerly across Yankee Doodle Road through the O'Neil property. It is anticipated with the future development of the O'Neil property, the Yankee Place intersection with Yankee Doodle Road will become a signalized intersection with raised medians and channelization constructed both north and south of Yankee Doodle Road. Since the Yankee Place intersection with Yankee Doodle Road is anticipated to be opposite the major entrance point to the O'Neil property, the development of Outlot G should provide a major access point opposite Town Centre Drive. This major access point opposite the Yankee Place/Town Centre Drive intersection would provide the major access point to Outlot G with secondary access allowed along the southerly boundary of the Outlot G adjacent to Town Centre Drive and proposed access to Outlot G along Yankee Place northerly of its intersection with Town Centre Drive will have to be restricted. The traffic circulation of the proposal as submitted does not provide full access to a public street for the residual property, not included as a part of this proposal, which is adjacent to Yankee Doodle Road. RIGHT-OF-WAY/EASEMENTS/PERMITS: The final plat shall include easements for the proposed sanitary sewer and watermain lines that will be stubbed to the adjacent property to the north. The developer shall obtain a temporary easement for grading the residual undeveloped site to the north. ( s This development shall dedicate an easement over Pond DP-20 up to the high water level. The existing ponding easement for Pond DP-20 does not cover the area of the pond up to the high water level. Restricted access shall be dedicated along the east side of Yankee Place from Yankee Doodle Road to the north edge of the Town Centre Drive intersection. This development shall be responsible for ensuring that all regulatory agency permits (MPCA, MWCC, Mn. Dept. of Health, etc.) are acquired prior to final plat approval. . FINANCIAL OBLIGATION • Town Centre 100 12th Based upon the study of the financial obligations collected in the past and the uses proposed for the property, the following charges are proposed. The charges are computed using the City's existing fee schedule and connections proposed to be made to the City's utility system based or the submitted plans. Improvement Use Rate Quantity Amount None There are levied assessments with an unpaid balance of S81,613 which will be allocated to parcels created this subdivision. CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL FOR TOWN CENTRE 100 12TH ADDITION 1. These standard conditions of plat approval as adopted by Council action on February 2, 1993 shall be complied with: Al, B1, B2, B3, B4, Cl, C2, C4, D1, El, Fl, G1 and H1 2. The landscape plan shall be submitted on a grading plan at Final Plat application. 3. All landscaped and green areas shall be irrigated. 4. Rooftop mechanical equipment shall be screened so as not to be visible from any property line. 5. The development shall add a manhole on the sanitary sewer service at the connection to the existing 6" stub. 6. The grading of the site shall direct its storm water runoff to an internal storm sewer system that will discharge directly into Pond DP-20. 7. The development will be responsible for maintaining a minimum of 8.0 acre feet of pond storage volume between the NWL and the HWL in Pond DP-20. 8. The grading plan for this development shall include emergency overland outlets from the low points on Town Centre Drive to Pond DP-20 with a maximum pending in the streets of 18". 9. Before any grading can occur on the adjacent property to the north, temporary easements from the adjacent property owner shall be obtained and submitted to the City with the grading permit or final plat application. 10. A storm sewer stub shall be provided to serve the 2.0 acre residual undeveloped property to the north. 11. If a driveway connection to Town Centre Drive occurs where an existing catch basin is located, then existing catch basins shall be reconstructed with a flat grade and a new catch basin shall be added on the upstream side of the driveway. 12. The utility plan shall include an 8" sanitary sewer and 6" watermain stub to the residual undeveloped property to the north. 13. This development shall provide an additional 0.8 acre feet of wet pond volume in Pond DP-20 in order to meet the water quality treatment obligations of this 6.6 acre parcel. 14. The filling of the wetland along the west edge of Pond DP-20 to provide additional area for parking and building for this development shall not be approved. 15. The development shall provide a 30 foot buffer strip along he edge of Pond DP- 20 to help prevent erosion into the pond. Z.C" 16. The driveway connections to the public streets shall include concrete aprons built to City Standards. 17. Restricted access shall be dedicated along the east edge of Yankee Place from Yankee Doodle Road to the north edge of the Town Centre Drive intersection. 18. This development shall revise the site plan to shift the northerly driveway opening to match the centerline of the Yankee Place/town Centre Drive intersection. 19. All driveways shall line up with any existing ones. (g9 STANDARD CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL A. Financial Obligations 1. This development shall accept its additional financial obligations as defined in the staff's report in accordance with the final plat dimensions and the rates in effect at the time of final plat approval. B. Easements and Rights-of-Way 1. This development shall dedicate 10-foot drainage and utility easements centered over all lot lines and, in addition, where necessary to accommodate existing or proposed utilities for drainage ways within the plat. The development shall dedicate easements of sufficient width and location as determined necessary by engineering standards. 2. This development shall dedicate, provide, or financially guarantee the acquisition costs of drainage, ponding, and utility easements in addition to public street rights-of-way as required by the alignment, depth, and storage capacity of all required public utilities and streets located beyond the boundaries of this plat as necessary to service or accommodate this development. 3. This development shall dedicate all public right-of-way and temporary slope easements for ultimate development of adjacent roadways as required by the appropriate jurisdictional agency. 4. This development shall dedicate adequate drainage and ponding easements to incorporate the required high water elevation plus three (3) feet as necessitated by storm water storage volume requirements. C. Plans and Specifications 1. All public and private streets, drainage systems and utilities necessary to provide service to this development shall be designed and certified by a • registered professional engineer in accordance with City adopted codes, engineering standards, guidelines and policies prior to application for final plat approval. 2. A detailed grading, drainage, erosion, and sediment control plan must be prepared in accordance with current City standards prior to final plat approval. 3. This development shall ensure that all dead-end public streets shall have a cul-de-sac constructed in accordance with City engineering standards. 1-4 4. A separate detailed landscape plan shall be submitted overlaid on the proposed grading and utility plan. The financial guarantee for such plan shall be included in the Development Contract and shall not be released until one year after the date of City certified compliance. D. Public Improvements 1. if arty improvements are to be installed under a City contract, the appropriate project must be approved by Council action prior to final plat approval. E. Permits 1. This development shall be responsible for the acquisition of all regulatory agency permits required by the affected agency prior to final plat approval. F. Parks and Trails Dedication 1. This development shall fulfill its park and trail dedication requirements as recommended by the Advisory Parks, Recreation and Natural Resource Commission and approved by Council action. G. Water Quality Dedication 1. This development shall be responsible for providing a cash dedication, ponding, or a combination thereof in accordance with the criteria identified in the City's Water Quality Management Plan, as recommended by the Advisory Parks, Recreation and Natural Resource Commission and approved by Council action. H. Other 1. All subdivision,zoning and other ordinances affecting this development shall be adhered to, unless specifically granted a variance by Council action. Advisory Planning Commission City Council Approved: August 25. 1987 Septemb 1 er 5. 1987 Revised: July 10. 1990 Revised: • February 2. 1993 LT S*5 STAN DARD.CON i 1 i E E i ; . E:, i :: •- % : ; ; •,c2,1 ,:: ;..1--.-.:• !! i T.,!,I; :II I“i:••-•. 1 : i! •:!;.i 1,::::1-.:: t"-k. •i: Ili 3;;'!:: . , I 1 ;:i •2 . i : . .; .::.; - :2 2-, 2 2•-• : 1 _ r i . t t m •:. :a.-:. I - .; -2; ... f ' i - • , 1 • f i 1 i : ; : ; • 27. i! :'::•'-':. : : k . , i i -: • : :: 13 :iiiti:. i 0 i 1 7 1 1 1 il ! i I . • 1 1 : 1 1 i 4 .; J1 ' z—___ _. ,:: 4.--: • : i - ti T V iii . iiii I 1 i 3 i i 1 i 9 i ! li ZI13 - II !. • • . - • i --.-- :" :, :• .• • I' • ..- `..-• ; 1 •-.' t: :•7 !..' - t.;i r . I. .•:' ::' i . ,... -. . ;4•• • ' =.' :I / .7. ; . ... • : • -'- i ,... Th• 11:i! Iti.'; t.I.: n i 1! '''' 1.: : r 2 - ;; 'iii i i: :. i :, - : DI • • \ . ,I, ! . , - ..,-- .j.'- .,)6,7•.*t •.....— ■■77,71—"..._.7.7_ _...4—, — t ■ ''' I' ' — ' .... .• ' . ., ,. . \ .... \ i , , t el s I` .'— 7 L ! • -. .... 1,....., ;- \ .. . F. ' -') : ..s- , a ., , , s...; 1 .1 i :z c I- P .1 t i' I :1 0 (:\' '‘'' \ N ''- ; ; / c 1 ..- ' / — t .Y.— . s,..., 1 , • ,,, , 's -. -.z....,',.._. . .. .....--:::---7".• ..-'.,' ,' -' ,- ,-,/ ,..., I, -, 1 ! i \ • --• . e-_--- -- ' --- • ,' / ,./ / i ,- ! , t. 1 ,,11 .1 ( I ,,,,-,s — , I • . .., , , - ----- - .•- --- — '-‘1.: ! !'s, s•----"' • I.!. \\:;.\...... ss.... --------------- ,-„-,- J., ,,-,----;'7 .1: " ii;" '. • ' ' \ s s: -,..` --- --. — , , .. ,,,,,.,./..//2.2 . , ; / i:' ,i ///,,,,,,,,, ,--/ ,,, / , , \ --_,._,-----._ /,,,,,-/ :,, •. \ , ,.. , ‘ .....„. , - ___0 - ----,/ ,,,, ,, ,,, ---; s : , ... .s , - __......_- • ..• i'(.....:: •• /1. / '' ' '' -- - - / , - X ' 1 --•,e„\,-•„ -••„ ,„, ----- -0--..„... ' ' .1 ' :)%%:17"------::::: -''.-". "‹...'„:-.--Z--.- --:--:::■,.............. _i.„4,-,:: ,.....,,-',,,,,,,,,,- --'.::": ' , `„ '-"....."■„:„....'---- -------- '....„ _... , --;...---<.---- .." .:-.7 -'.. ' . ,, "-., ........„:'------- "., . ,...-- ...• ,-".„............,..../</" ' ‘,..., I -::‘'::" 's,‘,.... '.s,_ ''',...7.7":„....7 ,A) ...,1...,•••)72.'..-'"•‘''''...--- .,,,'(•!....... X I , : ; ______ :..s.'■ :4.;'•""'.'---::'':.'.- - --...-'• ,-'''' • 1. ' - — — • ----""-------PL'":-.7------------...........:..... • ' , ..: • . t \ 77'''''-'.----'- . - ---...--- • . z — •- •.--.--...---Tr•i------Z.--.-.- .., • .— ---r. . -""'. '.--''.---... ---• ". ..''''''':••••-:.'.--''...:4:.;;I':'....:.: :,;-;;.°.' l i '..i., ..... __...)..■•A - '7 z.';'. ; , ......--. It 3:•,41 / . 7,... .............. 17. ( i . /Le 0 IOMMIS■14.14.111■M4.44 .• .... . —..---....... _.... 4.......m,4. .■■•,. • amp o■MACE FY.• lii MO woman....,hi 14115 WYDY3 salepossv 7 _.....•...... -.---.-.,,r---,•r= --- aro•MEW.TV NV weld a VS 121.1.r3J-1.1. OY3 . Ih.11..,.L.IL•••• X a Utre A < i Cr ••■•• • • ''.1 t 'IiIIH ili ....lilloiq ... I - . .,. .. ..... t . 3 I TAI'L‘'`. . • ■ , • . II; 'Ns. i . t h'''.. ,N. s.3.1 4 g .--------- -- ,,.. \\$g , 4 ..... E - ..7-1. ag 1: 1, -.- -, , -,..A0 ‘\ , r • r • -- .----• „A t*\\\\''...\ .,..-.•-—I,.._2... \ \ . ;' '''' . 1 I t i ;i:;' k \\ '• \ 0 T _„:/, it:17 _1 ..1 yv :11 -- • 14 . ?.' I 3 \\\\ ■ \b\\ E _ : Toe,TOY, ■‘ f• ' '\* 1 \ ..... , ...1 . .. ■ .. . , •\ I \.■ , ,z,.... . ..... all 1 2 ot ., ° P: .'. 1 t L >r - ,I , 4 • I I I 1'. I , i 4 5 .4 r..qPfg 'y 4 r-21 ■:: i i22.i■Lit li i 4.1 -?') - • f —"` ... - . ..M..•••• ......I.11■1, .. . :1,1,E..1.la•4 Or a 1 4 .......... ... ..........4 ........... ■■■4.0 . .... - aw■.......■• ■•■..■.... .■4:,.• 7.''. at ........... --.0- am•••ow.a NY( 'srvOY3 SQletJOSSV 7 .,....„........... ..____ ir.,........,,i tivId at Tell.V.11-11 x'"YOY3 - jalli Ta '. i GI ... 1 ? 3 '• I - i- i-.,„' ! ■I ; 7 =-. , c==i . 1-"-i- - -H- 121 — ----ii . --,--- _ i ---,--- _ r •. , --=-T--,--- = .__. _, _ — I' '., .. = ---- II I i j ' i d i ,.. .N.'.. c., ,, .,. • --1---- _ t---- .1 1111 1 . .,, .- t --7--- _ I ., ..••-.... ---T-- -..,-,-- , = i-- - 4 --,-- _ 4: ■_..._ ..=1. ' I - ,.---- . — I - .....,..,. I. • \ \ '....N.N........N.L..'4'k. ..'.--t • 1-11-•„ ;__-- -1 ' - ---. 4:t• rf •-- _ --7--- — = - ••.%,„ '"7' i 4 . :7. .0' •••■••• , 0 ...^\\\ s \\... T _ • . „ ...., ......_.. .., . . . „..... . .._ • i , ..., , : ,: , , __... , ....,, _ . „ . • ,.., •„_.. • = = , ,t .,...,, T = ., , :„, \ N , \ \A ..N. ,' , . 3 ., ‘) • .‘ \\ \ 1 t . .•••■ . ,, i ,.... h- 1 -„-- — ! . •.■ n ' ' - s . \ \ \''.. -s..■ ''.7. .'. \ . • 7- .. . -_r.-- --, • r--- v 4' • 1 " s i i' .- - \\ \''.1.. , \\ , ..,;_z_-7.-'. ,_ C :.'1• 4-2 ,-- .„1.•=,=,,:7-.1 ---1 , , .---- _ \ •t, .. \'s\\ '„.-- - , , --- -, ._. \ •,. ' , _,_-_ ____, , • c r -- — ,. \\.-......a...r--;....;7.-- i• . , \\ //' . , ; -_-1.--- 4:____________-•,-..---...0,,, . , .., , ■-- . . , .. ei- 11 --- 7... .lit Ili ' j., \ \ .•• SS '.1'.-.-7- 11,. . .; . u . ....— H ,, .• 6-■ ....— t .:: . . ' ..-. • ; '.. • ■ ....... 9 ' ..... . 1-4•CcA. e ,..,.: ■T,4 . "rr . Fit:: z ill ,1 ! 4 2 t 1 , c I k 7.::•:: I i i"" I > - t " . ‘ , ‘A • I • 1'. i , ..‘ , !:ili,• 1 i , 1 1 -.01•41-11 1 ■., t-,d:: 1 1 • , t ' ! I:■ ; !:,-5:: 1 4 li 1 i i i • I ' 11 ' ! ' , - a - - .. - — -x" "-- --ariarif I:x....3:::=411 a: .r.--7-= ft -...- ■•■■••■ - — —sxm sesumm,...■.',....:;.1!:', WPC 'NYDY3 saveIoossv 1 ..., ____,, z,....••.........: mid 2urprip alts IILLY31-1.1 HYDY3 XatILIPA 0 . . ., • . ‘ • 1 / , % N \\,.........\\„...:......-----s-----............. !GP '■ i li / : N -., < II if/ ••• e• N\ i ■ ',..-....■..-----_ , '''''JD. N. Z i' -'' -..'''.•...\ '' / / (/',KJ, / F.... // :71 . ■ iii ( .7. 1).1 \ ` N',:s ' , amain . , I•, ..t , , . _ .1 : I \ 1 t t. . \ • - IIII , i ,, \ • t . , \ , .z t, . , it t. ) jiik -.or 11 1,I1,---.\•, - ,, • \, ,, ‘.,\ \ . 11 .. as■ Ey I 1 ss ' Y \'\,,\-.; ,,■-.,\..\\, \ , 1.• , INIL , ... t ' Ell I. or / •i!` ., :1, \' \ •,- • , '‘ \ \ -,:,. \ •• ' ..... - /, ,I, \,.\ , ' . • .' \.:\ \ 2 ii ) ' r , ' st I f, t. -'- - is ';' • il ! • /-\ i il i. >Is./ "_ - : Mr / 1 ''\ ,1) •1•• ....,110,0•011".op', 1 I ,.. / • 4 / • ,1:...1 \.•,),' ..\ ,\\\- ,..°'‘. .7.,...--.. / ',II,, ',', ::/,- ' • Ili , I , N ,7-s. ) --,_-" -----.....s7,-:(11ktiv,11- 4:Ie' Y,K\'‘ //-.. -.=' / ---tr--...-•111.v X\ % I 1 \ -- .... - . 0.(0S!:". 1101,T--'44,r.; '. ' . I. . \ \\‘‘,.. i 1 ‘\,' A. ' ' .. 7"--,.::----;-4.4-"." --,.:.4"-7.- .---;# 11!.i'17- 1. -.4 I 1 4 6 I 5 h"V\\\ //)t..i/ / ■ ,1,i ) 1 1, 1 \ • •z)`I'l 4 1,1 I ,)'', 1-"'"'" ir.i ,;,....0111111.....- \ A )2,,A / ' ,,• ' I • ■ i .':,i , \ 711W11111111111E 00°\,/1.• /7/ ' I ' 1 A I \ I , \ \ ii \ • APP. '''' /7,.." ' /7./ I • 1101male ' ' — % \ \ ,)7 ' /-x, •, / . , ..., 1.-1 , I'11 Mfr.. .,.‘,-__.._.-_1.,1'.-„.-.,,',,.-„'_--- s„,,- .■ Iii=2LMII•1IN I1.M1o111w M11 1 IIIIlIlIiIrai...•lm,PmP.-\i\os\„\,\.,. /,‘s,7 7/ /z'// '/ „ / _ _./ / `-... •• ' • 4110212IMINIMM11.1 I , ' .-..- • z' -"7-' /--;' `•7-N - AIM. 1.. .."1/44-1,4monalimr-' , / \---...: . , v--`f.--`-.„ . ..,j--. ,..1.•.■-..,101111m1 ,,,,,,,,,..;-------".; :.., '''--„,„:_._±, i -- . > I I.,I,:i'1"-i-- - .1 ..• — ,I 2 . c,f-> .•-• ...... - Mffirgialgmm— / I ....___ ' 7:7. / , , _.,•- ---. _-- . „ , .....„ .• sh , 1 ..;.11 ![ -- li 1 1: 1! = L'".....1, II .., :4 1 j .r.,‘•:....:.:.• (1.1.1. 1 :: :., • ik & ,,.., . i x _,. , i ro,fr ), .-1,, -IA. M• Fil /4: i I! 1 I liant ..; • "iiii. 11 1,.1 1;11:illiliiilallh { 11'1 III! ;:•::: ei I 5 •■''.1. Wrt; ii 3 . li"i 1 !ii::1 I ; I 1.111;i: . 1 i : iiii.” :: : il li t r-i-ii ft li!I YilliTli:1 I A l' --it I I!:.: : .: 1 !ill:: ri;!t!■It 11:1!1!tiiill !!I! hill I j 1 : iiti : 1 j1 l' I. fitt;i; I li if ;I, li'VI I ; •-. ti x , r 11■ h '1 . • :i 1 ' 1 II ir l I t, 06 ' • 1' .1.1. ' '; !I %At: . i i ! f i 1 1 1■ - • , 1 _I 4 . ....... .. - . , . . . . _= -r.a...CA.i.r_i ..,1.. .... ... .. ...■. ._. . — --., ._ -- - , - , . e- - _v_ — " . ,, ,yDy salrSOis C,\ I uelo kvrrpn 311.1:41H1 WYDr1 , .. ........: AauurA (-) . - ' . • . — • 7.-.-...---.......-- ----- • it...--- .. - . , -,---t -..-:-..----1 It . r. . . -. i - I li . 2 • , •... / -..------,.. ...- ...' I 1= / ••,.,..., ,.orIP'. , \ \ — —I 1— --, -r-. i;-:::i.:-r: ! : : ;.; ,— --r, , ,\\ \' '• i: ::•ii,.:; .. ::',, . :: 1— , ., --. , d, ir';: ::•; i; ; !, I= 2--___:. 1 \ \ r--72 ------ ;\\ ,. ,,. i :',i '.,;;;: ; !; . r;': - ' :. 1— —1____!---■// •' 't.t 1 \ — , , „.• . . - u... I. •.:i :::', :::. . i : . I'. .. 6 . ..1.'\ \ .:. ,, . ,•,,.. .; . : . : :1: i i ... I I 1 I i 1 ■ \'''.. .1.1.....1 : : , , , , ...... 1. , ..-.■= '.. n l' . I i I I 1 ■.' '' • ! :' SI: .. _. ..- .. .' . ■ ' ' ' . OPP" • ---...;*'•'':. ................. - 1 , ..-•-•' . -- . . . , . . II , :9.: _,..--, - • a;.,•-c ;-_-.)t,„ •,•- _ - . • ,-.-: ....., ,_________ _ .1:: il _(.--- •;: •• • i•• : 1 .' 3 :• . : : i I I ,•,-;!:. ,': 1 ;;:::,::::1; i „i :- 1 ,. . .... • : 7 , , 4.,. :::,it 1! vi,•;:,; — : r: ■ '1 I}:." •;: •;••!.;'•ii : i ri •I. : ••••• . ti” i itti!a 71. _)..11_::n iia • E I - Ili i I \ 41!'• j:-. a t I , ; 41: l'% 4;•1 I : \\-= • i - 1 : . :., z,:: :Ittir-=' El * tEn ! •j IN!,;.iit!..:7,,!, •1 '..:,%." ,,Z) •1 :-;:,,,z;7-1 -LI. : 11r F = :t. 1 ; 1 !, 11h ; . 1; ' .. \ ,.• 1 ..... ! •.,. . _ .._ ! i ............,...00- i __,,, iiii : H1 ,11 :11 Iif___ - i 1.•,, ;.....,.....,, L.,,:. .....„;!, 1,•...,;!1:1 : 44)• - -- -4-- L.--.1-...- iftai •-• • 1.! 1:;ii' rr-!!! 4 ' III I .4• i ,itili; fit ii • k I II.;low • : t Pi:, ;-,,,, . .i i! !';Iti' i Pi '-'!'' <":-. .17:F12 ILL. r n 1 ;:ii..41;11 : ;i i.V.It 1 II '1',.. , --, '1,, 1• i•i ii,,• i .-t- I', • VI!! if.:. . ,e/,:■ 1' 0: jr;4 Li Or 23, wz 1 j-,,:!.:I ;:iii!:‘!1:, ' n!; 1 i ',.: ,.. '1.2diiiii-i i I, 1-t,'-.. 1-1 P!;1:;'.1;,i!■;', `.--€.! :: . 1 t a;I:ii'Y■11:- Ii i B I el -as U...1-"ii Itit:nil.i i I.:I,s, ;iv:,I. 1 21. li- i H .17" ---. '-'.4°0, _ ,i!! 4211'41'1i IL: , III J. I:1 2 A ,----'-‘4, 7 i: -r•-•N , Ixtt , .., ' '-li 7.!! .f,4, -- f-1 •72. .. r.r=r .1- al l'-'■''' 1 'I '1 -', -"*" ---_-.7, :,s, ..0:I Ik,.., ,— $i, ; ' 17. ':1-'.'"."'II, . .....• ;, , _ , ., ,, \\__ i /!1.12::) - giI;; 1 --``•1•4i VII. , lir 1 ....., ) '1.0111 1 ". ' • . 'F--- -=. il :15 `... .Ji '..-.4::: ,'Itei: .__. . - 0 I .1 / — -,a=- ,—„,...•. ••••V....•3!L., ea tive ./..//4.yy, v...../..., ...=.44 / /.44/4. twoommy.44 44 ...".... ..... . '1.j,,...•V maul..1.•J MI .NY Dri saiuloossv 7 VIIMBBOVIVIVIII NY1d 3dYDSCNY1 3):1.1Y1}1./ NYDY3 La LI LI VA < :::--... ..................... ...,...........,2 11 IC, iirirA,'cA ; i •••••• r>,'"''''ir.›. 74."T ; 4-"•••• 1 itlarialliral. I 'limr,, , , I Mr r rel i- i ==.1al ea 1 V Cli C Clik—I: ! 0 is 1 1 dur.1„ 1 Ns. Z t i e. • 11 _•- 'to . .1 •Val .. 0 t•1 „€1002 ... ...., ,, f '9 ......-"" .• III 1..... ...."'' \\00\ \O Ir,■ .\\ \ A 1 - — .. . 1 p 7 I ,-• •Noliii • \00. I 1.4- .-2..—' ',1 , /ph • :1' • — — - \ -- 1 44 \ if. j . i--:.- — .,\ ,,,...wr ,___ _ \ \ \\\\jar.A1-- i :, ,, t__-. ; . \\ ,„ ..-.. ,pr• i --, — ; - 1--1--- 1 ` ''S ' , •.'.. i• ......"'" r , _.,..'''\•.'- a 7 ----h -( ) • -.--, :..., - !' S..i: , \ \....0\\ r). .. ' , • ; : . ..11°. .: 1: ' ... z 1111.-- ! 1 1 1 1„.---■! \ \ 1,--.'- \ -1. 1 P . \<,..!,.... Isiii— "L'"--=:,- ‘ I • k . •y .4 111\l'' ti Fl 1 --( ...... t. I r- •1 1 k • _.,...-_,.......„______, in''''S C .......-."--.......r.....s....--."-..."--.. 111111411tail.."1.. ..:11 - .• ,,_,......__, cr.--7,m, . _ '".•---.11..-.^:-....r.--:...-/,/ . , 4,.- •'i 7...•=7■4. ...;:"...ow.4../ ..:e• 'rt 4 414114.VMS 1..doe i Pil.441/4.1•%V V •v .4 4/•=4•./.7÷,:/"....Zy MI 0 eV .4 OV-.4..IVY. Y.//0 1) t I Via I •..,-1,...., , I NM 4,V•• V IV I/ 444 y 4 II 6/VV.41•7/6 v.o • VW /4 , ....VM•V.III Nam war.. saw maw.a .a. • ..•• ' ' ).1,..-: t"i 1' , • MY..4/V .....yr, _.........„.t. 1 "'"'"..I.=..%.?'.......;:,''''Ai t\ 1 ...14‘,7T.,.... . ... \S• 'moo tomumn. (felZ, . e _ ■...■.... I A . %.. .. ..._ . _ . . . _ —.— — • —.. .. -- ---- --._ _ ........ ............. .,,■•■• 1.... •.;`. N V!)V:i soie!oosv c? JoI.J.);• :I i,..,. "1: .,■:)r.1 X3uut2.\ < ........_ , , — . , ii I Li ri 4 ..,, I • i f ! i I I i . t 1 I • . . /\ 1 111 ..._ . I ....,..... . T 7 , n * . I: 1 1 i . •■•■■• 111■ ..• , 1 ..--... • fl i II 1 . .:. , = 4::■ r f--- .• 1 I. -.1 . T J'-7-.-' : r c■ E , , • . i . ..i•.,;;1 7 f.0...., ----- !,1 I! v• T a i I L 4 / , 0i IA 1,L„.. ) ins•a i n■.,-- r , ,1_, , ! .. ll [ 1 .:. .... ...._ ; 1 i... - ., ; . 1 L iil ' J i r •' 77 ---, ,.2. 11 1r; • • g I ' 11 \ : 17 . ;n , • 1., ., 1 I k, 1 . le: ,,Ht. , '• • n 0 0 . . • . • . .. . • (CD ce' SITE i ji. , .e. ... , , ,-- . ....,_ 1 ••• "• f.: N .,. 010,... /7/ r________ Iti 1 :.5 TS i. 67 0./_,i 0)//1/ , i \) •.1.4 -,.., 67.15/ 557/ 5,•. 1 ::.)-1, i C6li • • 7JD fl 4O 0 t5i1.0/ V)43i/67.0 61.1/75.0 678/72.0 I c. 9 4/62.0 ) C) L ? ets ,..7......,.— 20 . le 1)n*n 18`C) 18" RI _.. 1tv ,20'' _J i . 17IJF.E i11■TNT:t1 4.S....1 11 : -,\ V 0 r 8I 4.- • - Ir5- .l'W 5•5 0 Ce ' a . // "- 126 a 7 Pi 7 67• 1,' ) 61 1 ki .. 1 J I)\7etgPI'...9.C.R3'4 - , / / ■/7,,11j,6,, e Z, ._,..o 7 , , ,_ ,,,..-_-.?, _ ..;.' •%-- 119 / •- -- / 4/1) ? . -re" ' .."--/.:,;•4 ./:577'...01!ir.-, . ' c,,R•.:•• 54 yip.151-i>.,.. ..... .., kt:.{ ,r.,.,L,K VI= 49 6•41V. 11,-r-, - - op ego 1/111 SO :, r. __, 24 gtED-riFt - 4i : iiN ... f ' -..? .. -.- le' i554711..0- -i- • (2 ... ., .. . ■7,4y, ..:-r-, -'1'/\- i 1 • ..--7e 1/ 2...-.. -3,%\":1 =:"=, ir -.; C "' .. 47' • \ ' ) c-, •: .A_ , 1 ' TI•,„4 / . I / j*' .-g;''''iE . .6-5L41:1°/Tio- , ,•.- .-4,' set--; -4"...__:z3'..A;-' ., i'0,/::;.1::. 1 ' r 7} 4tr' .!,.u..,r, <• ' • • , • 0.sreto,— i /- -,__L: _, - 12 _ .\___. _ ....1..... ...... z.,... --ty_i a, ,-0 \ - i 1 -- — 3.-,. ..,L 4..A..,,,, • , ? l-1..,:. 1, i, ' ‘', NI,4IMO 8 411, -5(1‘?.•' ''. .....1_,... .......,-7 • -, 12'1 ' issi, . • - ' 1 /• [ 4“_.3, - ,.2 ._1....f._,. , . , ,--• — .— • -1-1SCOT ,, , . '.1 ! 7 12 \ '" - L' 411)72.6/83.0 \S- • I ,_ • c1.5 61 4/77.0 :).-..-,. - • : • .--'-.-=-'1 '-‘• te,i./Fs-b•-; -- i- t / c._'-' ,_., ,i...-.:, . - 'a-- _._. , H LL 1 _ 1-- 1.;:-.-.7 t- - • ,-.-■ ---1 411. ...' . ,,__,1.1,r-lz., ,...._ ::„•-,.. .._,, • ...1- ., :..7...1 •.0 -i•—,, ,.. f.,__ _ ,n. ,,,, , , Kci:•,fi _ --:,f.J:-..4.t4,,.-".- w-__---- -- . ,L , ., • •• .j... ..... Lc • li 7 1/' --kft---H---,--i-• ,-- -14-7-6,4991:?,, ... * 31.." 'ESA v• 7, ---• I-I 7.X7Nfi -...7:,1:)., -=".: -1 ....7.1_217 1 Wn17.1 / i 1- I ET .433) 7 le -./N ‘ICP;;L: -:' --••_:-7,17"; . fr-11 T-7=-J _, :-TE—' )"-=, ----).- .,,,,. ir/ - 1 655-7771.37,tr,71\- . c.i_-.,. ... ; „,■ z,,j,.. -- -•-•-s7-7L-7 ---F-R-74,7-7. ,y,•=1 • . NO 2 ,1",;1-_-, .; tc:73,) 1,,:.-.-.,,2.4ii • , 41),-::=4,.-_. • . . FIG. NO. 8 . . . WATER DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM . CITY OF . . EAGAN • ., • • t, :-...,, —.1.----limm' 7."'), )/ Y"'"' "D P 19 . -D• ,........., >,, , ,,,,,tiir ,....,,...5 , ,,., . 8 8 4,0 Y S -N 890.0 S. PcjIDT i ii,z 16.Ii.4171•■ r:17--;:;, —....L....!!4 1.p • SERigg..c, . L , ',....... '•' 1,, , ,t1L". . ,, A , 4 j 1 , I I i . i • PI'. CP-4 :- ' '--:V,-,...\V' e r "1 873.6 , t , i E, / b_li a o • 6'1 i: 842.f 4 ..,k,,. ,., , „ L.. ..i; .,/„.. ... 7,/ _ _ . POP---20 DP-I3 882.0 . ■S. .........., r•-.. a ,e it. /...0D,Tiotii1/4; ,/,,/ 876.o Dp..6! 884.501 / DP-I I /• 8711.5 857.3! ' 011 / 114 856.Q 7 Zr /7.73.0/1 •/ I 866.5 tki fa 864.0 875..9 I I° -. i 11-, P a - . _ 1. 1 '7/ 011/4g - DP 838,5 1 V . 855_. .-- 7 Tiff,, DP-2/61 48-6 DP-4 L.S.-7 4/111""IP- 1 / --,---- ve Q : 6 • c-h ' .8749-, 1 N , U A-:I/ • ° 31 D-s , 01 CO. ' RDitimmi4e .... -f") Aix e- -110 SIT, , -5 4 • N I C..7 C.111 orap ix oN 9 'I- N S•Ni.T38481•( D •-g C .6k-4--N,TY. , / ." >,--,-- - --j---i-' -',$ DP-2 N.,RE 2NC. 86a19..) 8 ) 4-$>- -901.0 8 • .7.... - • ,,, eEti 70v,N ,;,L D .4 —•P-71 1 i 1 0 ' C1% c, re--*W7i T V.C.L.EATIPI •E!P':Z glil: 21•111■• .I / !'itITH , p_rx_10-r, • ir il i /77-4... .! WI -5 .' *.'") ) '. ' .-1':i. 2 TO,6 Pi CE\ 0;4..T ' "I I •- (.. __,.4 L-.', - 70 F IRS T ; I.P.P._:22-'miliP , "..K , ,00 D - 1 j ,42.2)1,1F-87.J,0 n•-."1"1-' ' ' °PA . 5 -1.---, .frag'.4i-li ......„.... ,........ 4,.... ie. /846. n rt-18f6704:.-. rlf,Vi.1 7.--•: 73 ....., . _.9_1, J..;'t).895,, .ii„,...,q.87 .,,-.. ' --813/I° •T';1 g.$ ."---'. ' 'L' Is.‘,_ .. (i1, jP-e-.1 -5- '''' 7 i 7-- N) / 1 t7r1 '''" ..-% gitjc5) f'21r_1411i '?-.10(,-;;•975 9•f-9-"V°14"-IN ;i 1 ri-' S.') 1 ..2- . 4_ • 1-"1:.L1--- '• ir litik -. • . 12. T- --r,„- -i..,____L I \ ..- - 1 I :■-:•J P.=4 7-4:6-c, ---.,..— v( ._, . JP-II v 44.0 *,--, \.1"..\1../ \N.'r-s \ ..-.... • FIGURE No. 17 • STORM SEWER LAYOUT • • MAP :, . . . CITY OF EAGAN 4. . 740g Page 9/EAGAN ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES JULY 27, 1993 TOWN CENTRE 100 12TH ADDITION XANN THEATERS, INC. Chairman Voracek opened the last public hearing of the evening regarding a Preliminary Plat consisting of approximately 6.7 previously zoned CSC (Community Shopping Center) acres within the Eagan Heights Commercial Park Planned Development, a Conditional Use Permit for a pylon sign, and a Variance for parking requirements located along the south side of Yankee Doodle Road east of Yankee Place in the NE 1/4 of Section 15. City Planner Sturm stated that all building and parking setback requirements are met with this proposal. He stated that the applicant is proposing a variance to allow 143 fewer parking spaces than required by Code and to allow 9 feet stall widths instead of the standard 10 feet width. Further, the applicant is requesting a pylon sign with a square footage of 185 sq. ft. instead of the allowed 125 sq. ft. Lastly, the applicant is proposing a marquis with chasing lights which is not allowed by Code. Member Merkley arrived. Jim Greupner, a representative of Mann Theatres, stated that they have been in business for 46 years and currently have 19 theatres in Minnesota. He mentioned that they were looking to build a theatre somewhere in the south metro and decided that Eagan was the best location. Mr. Greupner then discussed the concerns that City staff has with this proposal. He stated that they are requesting a 1: 4 parking ratio, which is a standard for the theatre industry and one which their other theatres have. Any overflow on holidays or Saturdays could use the adjoining office building parking lots as the hours of operation would be different. Mr. Greupner stated that they also are requesting 9 foot stalls. Their other theatres have 9 foot stalls and they have hx:1 no problems. He mentioned that customers will not be loadirg or unloading their vehicles with merchandise using a shopping cart as in other types of businesses. Regarding the filling of .4 acre of wetland, Mr. Greupner stated that there was no way around it. He did mention that the developer is willing to increase another wetland in the City in exchange for the filling in of this wetland. Mr. Greupner commented that they need the off-site pylon sign for better visibility. The chasing lights on the marquis would not effect any residential homes and would be very tasteful and attractive. He ((t9 Page 10/EAGAN ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES JULY 27, 1993 stated that they are opposed to conditions #14 and 15. In conclusion, Mr. Greupner stated that he believed this site would work for a theatre and,they were very excited about this proposal. 've of the developer, stated that ' hael Colon, are representative P , Mic p they were proud to bring this application to the City. . He mentioned that not every City has an opportunity to have a first rate theatre such as Mann Theatre in their community. Mann Theatre is considered to the main "player" in the state in regards to theatres. Mr. Colon reiterated that the City will not lose any wetland with this proposal as they are prepared to increase another wetland in the City, such as O'Leary Lake. He also •mentioned that the accesses are proposed as they are so that the main traffic flow is not in front of the theatre. Dave Nash, a civil engineer for the applicant, stated that by working with City staff they can alleviate any problems stated in conditions #8 and 12 . An attorney for Blue Cross/Blue Shield stated that the theatre will be located adjacent to one of their office buildings and they are opposed to this proposal. She stated that there is mostly office buildings in this immediate area and a theatre is not compatible and consistent with this area. She was concerned that with the shortage of parking stalls, customers from the theatre will use their parking lot which would cause them problems especially during the afternoon showings. Larry Guthrie, a resident of Drexel Court, stated that he was in • favor of this proposal and believed that it would be a good addition to the City. He mentioned that Mann Theatres has a good reputation and believed that an office building and a theatre were a good mix. He questioned if there would be bicycle racks available at the theatre. Mr. Greupner stated that bicycle racks are proposed on the site. Member Merkley stated he was very excited about Mann Theatre coming into the City. However, his major concern was access and circulation. He felt that not having the access points line up could create traffic congestion. Another concern was the two future restaurants sharing the same access as the theatre. Basically, he felt that the traffic flow for this site was not adequate and unsafe and therefore he could not support it. He mentioned that he had other concerns with this proposal, however, he suggested that the Commission concentrate on the site plan first before getting into details. /,:)4 I / / &ot-eLd /l7c�lru , , 7/0 /7/--' /PN Page 11/EAGAN ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES JULY 27 , 1993 Chairman Voracek concurred with Member Merkley's comments. He also felt there would be a shortage of parking spaces when the restaurants were developed. Member Heyl stated that she too had a concern with the access points and felt they were not acceptable. She mentioned that the applicant stated that there will be parking problems on Saturdays and holidays and that customers will be parking across the street. She did not feel comfortable with customers walking across a street to get to the theatre. She also mentioned that she had a concern with the wetland. Member Wallace felt that the site could be workable. He is familiar with the Mann Theatre located in Maple Grove and stated that it is very nice. Martin Colon, the developer, stated that the proposed access points would best serve the development. He stated that they could adjust the northerly access to line up with the access across the street. He felt that by moving the south access it would force the traffic in front of the theatre which would create a safety concern. Mr. Colon stated that his company paid a great sum of money to build the internal road system in Town Centre so future businesses could have access. He was confused as to why the City was now saying they could not use the accesses on the roads that they built. He further mentioned that excess parking is proposed in the concept plan for the restaurants . Lastly, the proposed exterior material for the theatre is very expensive and will be aesthetically pleasing. Member Merkley agreed with Mr. Colon in that moving the access point without moving the theatre would create traffic in front of the building. He mentioned that previously he was not implying that only the access be moved. He stated that even if Mr. Colon built the roads, the City still needed to be concerned with safety. Member Isberg also stated his concern with the traffic circulation and the probability of stacking of vehicles. Michael Colon mentioned that if the access is denied, it will be almost impossible to get a first class restaurant into that area. He said that to market a particular area, access and visibility is "everything. " From a marketing standpoint this site plan has been revised to bring in top quality businesses. He stated that they would be agreeable to an added condition which would require the developer to increase a wetland elsewhere in the City so that the wetland on this site could be partially filled. A l/gb Page 12/EAGAN ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES JULY 27, 1993 Chairman Voracek stated that he was excited about the prospect of Mann Theatre coming to Eagan and the Commission was not trying to impede the marketing of this area. He stated that the Commission's basic concern was with the health and welfare of the citizens of Eagan. He stated that the Park and Recreation Commission could deal with the wetland issue. • Bob Vanny, architect for the applicant, explained the reasoning behind the positioning of the accesses. He stated that their design forces customers to park in the south parking lot. Member Hoeft felt that the north access does not work because of its proximity to Yankee Doodle Road. Mr. Greupner commented that they can not move the theatre any where else on this site. He requested that the Commission take action on this matter that evening. He mentioned that if this site does not work, they will find another site. Member Gorman wanted it noted that he is not in favor of the building being constructed of precast material and requested that the building be constructed of brick. Member Hoeft mentioned that the theatre would be a welcome addition to the City, however, without knowing what will be developed north of the theatre and how it would affect the traffic flow and access points, he could not support this proposal. Hey]. moved, Gorman seconded, the motion to deny a Preliminary Plat consisting of approximately 6.7 previously zoned CSC (Community Shopping Center) acres within the Eagan Heights Commercial Park Planned Development located along the south side of Yankee Doodle Road east of Yankee Place in the NE 1/4 of Section 15. Hey]., Gorman, Merkley, Hoeft and Isberg voted in favor; Voracek and Wallace voted against. Motion Passed 5-2 . ADJOURNMENT Isberg moved, Hoeft seconded, the motion to adjourn the July 27, 1993 Advisory Planning Commission meeting at 10: 00 p.m. All voted in favor. Secretary - Eagan Advisory Planning Commission 1 ( MEMO city of eagan TO: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES ACTING COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR HOHENSTEIN FROM: ' CITY PLANNER STURM DATE: AUGUST 12, 1993 SUBJECT: TOWN CENTRE 100 TWELFTH ADDITION At the July 27 Advisory Planning Commission meeting, the Town Centre 100 Twelfth Addition consisting of one 6.7 acre lot for a Mann Theatre was denied 5-2 after a lengthy presentation and question and answer period. The site is located along the south side of Yankee Doodle Road immediately west of the Blue Cross/Blue Shield 10-story building on a parcel zoned Community Shopping Center (CSC) within the Eagan Heights Commercial Park Planned Development. The plan leaves a residual 180' along the north side of the lot for future development that the applicants are anticipating as restaurant sites. The site plan shows a conceptual layout that could accommodate two 324 and 234 seat restaurants based on one parking stall for every three seats. The following issues were discussed: • The off-site pylon sign at the intersection of Yankee Doodle Road and Yankee Place. • 9' wide parking stalls. • The Variance to allow 406 parking stalls as opposed to 549 required by Code (one stall for every three seats). • Ingress/egress and internal circulation. • The filling of the wetland and the building exterior proposed to be a decorative precast panel. 1 _ On August 11, the applicant submitted a revised site plan that shifted the building slightly to the south and now provides an uninterrupted drive lane to the proposed restaurant pads to the north. This reduced the number of parking stalls on the theater lot to 373, or one stall per a 4.4 seat ratio. The southerly access point does not line up with the one for the Town Centre Shoppes across the street as called for in Condition #19. The applicants are objecting to Conditions #14 and #15 regarding wetland requirements. if you would like additional Information, please contact me. City Planner JS/js 17 = II i . • 41111 ;11 a1 i 1 fit;i1T 1)!ii! ti .2 4 111 1 YMY.;L FA "`� �°�'�i" -1•� � ' F i i l l I I I I - I LLL.LI.I , I_.. .i_2,.._1 r+L ' 4 /' \\ ` , 11 1 I s rm .a \ \ I ' \ ,ice -� Imo+ I ;-1 _ :� v. \ \.\\1-\ - — -- = r. VA\A \ \A =1 �S 4 1 gt i _ \ p \ .1'.\\ 1i S� 3. K , �f� •\\� v .V'\\�,� .,� � y — -� LI,1 — 7,1'.' (1 k\\\''\ ' ,\\ ____i :, ..\ \\\\ . ___: r! ' i .\\\\\\\\\\_\:: 9:41`, --7— , :e --"" a ///: . i I -1 ---- ' C '■ ;11 =—i ■ Y i —r1 ('-'' ) D — nom_ •i 4 /i Vanney -_— .� :� _ R EV i S E D E CAN THEATRE _. — I- Associates EACAN, YN v��r, �- - --- - - r i L� �.--- -- - I , I , 1 AUG 1 1 1993 , - ..„..,-, .ig' t . U I 1i.1 'f! cr ;1 • >•? t;13i.k,11 t * 7411 1 vIwt■ lit i?. 1 4 IWI'II : • 11■!.1 1 .1 * ?i n --t L. -- .•r 1.. ,1 .e--J 1 .0;:....... . • ••••• . .• c . ; * _..._........ ..,..v•., ....-- \ • \ \ 1 I , I*, , 1__J - , - '''''''' \ I ' II ' Ll• III --IIIII ! . .. • 1 — I Ik . --%. ' --= -i.---. n . i •'i ; -n si .• _ • II ' ! 1 1 . 1.t ' ' \ \= \ Hi t__ ,. 7.__J,-- , —• ,r;,.. . \ '\. ■--"'"--- ..,, ,i - = --- ---. -... .....-, ',,,'d'. 4 ' •, I -..-..:-.... --- ' -•• ,- --- — t'ij (11. 1 1---• • = . • i -- i z .1 ^ .1 —.—.1--- g — /,' . \ \ \ ' ' '• 4 •-•'. . ' .•■• 41 \'' S ' , N 11: \\\ • ' 1 — i.7.; " i—. =7---- • e. ' — ,;., ;7 ,_._ --L--- . )-..:- . , , .,\ . .. • __ . , 1._._ ___•___ , • , • ... ........_ _ \ _ .,• I ... . • ' s ' ' '. ,. (1"L'.' • . .__ •;,. \\ , ‘ \ a'•,... .. . ......-• .c. if :3.1 • , tavip.... — .......4.--.. . j — .--.. '• .......4_.... i ' . \\\\\ -*:.- • .. .-•-.'"' ...*-... .s-+ Jill - i I ILLLI - • \\\■\ t - I . ,..-'.... . , 1.1 ....-1.--. . IS\ . ..' ...-•"... 7. -.......L-... 1 . 1 :e., ■.. t = Lt. —L-- .••'... •-•• ' 1.. . ... " .' i I • 1..i . .. .. L.... • 1 ''. P i ---• L .... 0.• --. :i • fit,I• I • n±-7 . T. = .. = , — 1 I I 1 i:-11 = C = ! . !i- b--- 41)1 di120 60414, aim.keeer ......-------*— *.-*........---wy ClIv J -- 7.... . > IFT•rney II EAC AN THEATPE EACA.N MN I S i I e 18,yre• AMP sm.V NO •••••...••••••aipir—■•■ mal•••••••■• "..•4-77"..1. °...-"'"••'micas- Inc.— = u••••a.••••• _ MEMORANDUM ,PTO: 40M HEDGES, CITY ADMINISTRATOR FROM: KEN VRAA, DIRECTOR OF PARKS AND RECREATION DATE: AUGUST 12,1993 RE: TOWN CENTRE 100 12TH AD DI'11ON MANN THEATERS, INC. At the Advisory Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission Meeting on August 5, the Commission reviewed the Town Centre 100 - 12th Addition proposal. The Development and owner were present at the meeting. There was significant review and discussion regarding the proposal by the developer to fill in .4 acres of wetlands. Mr. Colon, developer of the Town Centre additions, explained his perspective on the history of the pond. He went on to say that filling in the .4 acres of wetland would be made up on the project site through expansion of the wetland area adjacent to O'Leary Lake. Commission members expressed their perspective that construction around the pond would do more than just remove the wetlands; that would be a loss of existing vegetation, general degradation of the site and creation of a great deal of asphalt. Members questioned why the developer could not purchase additional land to the north to provide sufficient parking for the theater site. The owner, representing Mann Theaters, explained that Mann Theaters did not own that property and that the expense of additional acquisition did not make the project feasible. The representative then went on to explain that they were looking for a variance from the city for parking space as it was their impression that the ratio of parking was excessive at 3 to 1. Further review of the proposal, members of the Advisory Commission also raised questions and recommendations for a sidewalk along Town Centre Drive and the potential for a trailway around the pond. Currently, an asphalt trail does exist on the east side of the pond servicing the office building. Members reasoned that a trailway around the entire perimeter of the pond would be beneficial to both developments. (gle Town Centre 100 - 12th Addition Page 2 August 12, 1993 Members also questions if this development met the city ordinance requirements regarding greenspace within impervious areas. This ordinance requires 5% of the area to have landscape islands. After additional discussion by the Commission regarding the wetland,the Commission felt that the filling in of the wetland for this development did not seem appropriate given current wetland regulations. Members felt that removal of the wetlands to provide for parking space was not appropriate and it would be better for the city to provide a variance for reduction in parking than to fill in the wetland area. The Commission then recommended the following eight items for Council consideration. 1. The developer is to excavate Pond DP-20 to provide .8 acre-feet additional wet pond volume to meet water quality treatment requirements for the proposed development. 2. The developer is to be required to obtain water resources program staff approval for the excavation plan. 3. The developer's proposal to fill .4 acres of wetland associated with Pond DP-20 be denied and alternatives to avoid or minimize filling be pursued. 4. If the City allows any filling of the wetland, a plan must be submitted for approval by staff to replace the filled area on a acre-for-acre basis as required under the interim program of the WCA. 5. Any wet pond volume lost due to filling is to be made up by additional excavation in Pond DP-20. 6. The City of Eagan Tree Preservation Guidelines are to be followed and applicant must identify size and species of significant trees on the grading plan. 7. A sidewalk is to be incorporated along the west and south side of the site. KV/nh n lmann.mem cc: Marilyn Wucherpfennig, Planning Aide Joe Merchak, Construction Analyst Mike Foertsch, Assistant City Engineer 7r7 BlueCrossilueSrl►e,d (JP © of Minnesota P.O. Box 64560 • St. Paul, Minnesota 55164-0560 August 12, 1993 Mayor Tom Egan City of Eagan Eagan, Minnesota 55123 Re: Mann Theaters, Inc. Development Dear Mayor Egan: I am writing in follow-up to the meeting on July 27 of the Advisory Planning Commission and their decision to oppose the Conditional Use Permits and Variance which were requested in connection with the proposal to build movie th eate r s a nd potentially, two restaurants on the site adjacent to our Waterview Office Tower on Yankee Doodle Road. Legal counsel representing Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Minnesota attended the meeting to express our opposition to this development. It is our position that this retail development would be incompatible with the office properties located in the immediate vicinity. It is our understanding that there will be a projected parking shortage of between 120 and 150 spaces, which we feel will result in use by restaurant and theater patrons of our parking facilities. In addition, we are concerned that the additional traffic generated by these businesses during our normal business hours will jeopardize the safe exit of our employees and customers from our parking lot, particularly at the end of the business day. Finally, we were dismayed to learn of the plan to fill in a portion of the pond which is partially located on our property and enjoyed by our employees during lunch and other break times. Certainly, when we originally leased the property several years ago, there was no indication that Federal Land would permit the alteration of this green space. Please note the attached petition signed by our Waterview Office Tower employees. We agree that movie theaters would be a positive addition for the residents of Eagan, providing that the site can adequately accommodate the needed parking and ensure the safe flow of traffic. We respectfully submit that another site would better serve the long-term needs of these types of retail establishments. Sincerely, Sharon Zau r Assistant Vice President Administrative Services SZ/cj • (lAfe - • ri BlueCross BlueShield CU) V of Minnesota P.O. Box 64560 • St. Paul, Minnesota 55164-0560 TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: MANY EMPLOYEES WHO WORK AT THE BLUE CROSS/BLUE SHIELD WATERVIEW OFFICE TOWER OBJECT TO THE PROPOSED THEATER SITE WEST OF WATERVIEW. OUR POND OR (WETLAND) IS ENJOYED BY ALL EMPLOYEES AND TO FILL IT WOULD BE A TRAVESTY. PLEASE CONSIDER ANOTHER SITE FOR THE THEATER LOCATION. THANK YOU FOR YOUR CONS:[DE RATION. MRS. DORIS KRAEMER 4069 DEERWOOD TRAIL EAGAN, MINN 55122 NAMES ADDRESSES PHONE #'S e uVci rd 5 -S?R 2. _ 3. 1(Y1 C' c , C-{- 4. Cam'' �✓� 5. 6. 6 x..6L s 7. 8. , 9- Li/ , • A . / °Li(', „ 11. )7 r �%,:-1- 41/ 12. \ "' dF-S`-V 13. ( Y L'J'�/«_ 14. �� �, , 11.0 1�.�., .- 1.�-J 15. 16. ; /z"q //.( , G1',' vsr$ USA orca'sconso'���� U S 0'Y- 7i2q y/ aec G C'Z '74 e ire S/ --/e ct 60j , ? c e 72-71--- --to Zth-i-er- i .9c,,2) Bc_467c, Pho' i/ie /Voi-nie A-7;0_t-cfs 1-/y 1-- ah.....1 40- ://;11-L /GJNWv 1 591°1( ( ' S/ • W/. lwl{. V`^-lam // 4. J�o {. r 1,> / 5)(t4zie-c— / -15t t 91 Ce P0± At - nom.-u €C e -110 Upper 1 3rd T G (-I r i C - L ; e 1-) . . 3. CO.( 1 c ' Li-) l^)n i 5\3� ` - Sit. ;, .-1 � I I' r! / - r\-. - c - r 1 1ji: chnQc.t 1574 7 E.: Au tit-IAA:a) t ae...- r- / =2. • /----e-(- t L� " 1 1' . 7 °- Agenda Information Memo September 21, 1993 City Council Meeting MEW W USI S DRIVE AISLE SETBACK VARIANCE/NORWEST 1ST ADDITION A. Variance, Douglas P. Watschke, of 5' to the 5' parking and drive aisle setback requirement on Lot 1, Block 1, Norwest 1st Addition,located in the SW 1/4 of Sec. 10--An application has been received of Douglas Watschke on behalf of Norwest Banks for a 5' variance to the 5' side yard setback for a drive aisle proposed to be constructed on the northwest side of the Norwest drive-up banking facility. The variance would result in a zero lot line configuration for the bypass lane. For additional information with respect to this application, please refer to the Community Development Department staff report which is enclosed on pages ( (ofor your review. City Code requires that a hardship unique to the property be demonstrated to qualify for a variance to minimum City Code requirements. The applicant has indicated that the intention to activate all drive-up lanes as well as an automatic teller machine in the current traffic lanes constitutes this hardship. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny a variance of 5' to the 5' drive aisle setback for Douglas Watschke for Lot 1, Block 1, Norwest 1st Addition as presented. I� l SUBJECT: VARIANCE APPLICANT: DOUGLAS WATSCHICE LOCATION: SW QUARTER SECTION 10 EXISTING ZONING: PLANNED DEVELOPMENT-LIMITED BUSINESS (PD-LB) DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: SEPTEMBER 21, 1993 DATE OF REPORT: SEPTEMBER 14, 1993 COMPILED BY: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT APPLICATION SUMMARY: An application has been submitted requesting a 5'Variance to the required 5' side yard setback for parking/drive aisle on Lot 1, Block 1, Norwest 1st Addition, located at the northeast corner of Pilot Knob and Yankee Doodle Roads. EXISTING CONDITIONS: The existing Norwest Bank drive-up is designed to accommodate seven drive-up lanes, five of which are currently active. The northernmost lane is presently located 10' from the property line. Staff noted a trash dumpster stored in the eastern portion of the drive-up area which must be removed. COMMENTS: According to the applicant, the bank has an immediate need to install an automatic teller machine (ATM) on the last island (seventh lane). Also,the bank anticipates a future need to install another drive-up station for the sixth lane. The bank currently has a 24-hour ATM in the building foyer. There is enough space to activate both lanes without any physical site modification, however the proposed ATM lane currently operates as a bypass lane. The applicant believes the hardship for the Variance is that the additional ATM in the drive-thru area will eliminate any bypass lane. The bank prefers a bypass lane; the City Code does not require one. The City requires a minimum 5' parking/drive aisle setback from interior lot lines which provides a minimum green area for landscaping, snow storage, etc. of 10' between neighboring uses. As proposed, the new bypass lane will have a zero setback and construction of this lane will require the bank to encroach temporarily on private property. Norwest Bank must obtain a temporary construction right-of-entry easement from EPP Properties to expand the drive. A Preliminary Plat application is being presented to the Advisory Planning Commission on September 28 that proposes parking set back the required 5' from this property line which will result in a 5' green space that parked cars will overhang to approximately 3' from the bank's new curb line. k6\- If approved, this Variance shall be subject to the following: I. The applicant shall obtain a temporary construction right-of-entry easement from EPP Properties. 2. Any additional signage associated with the expanded use will require a sign permit and be subject to the one-time sign fee of $2.50/sq. ft. 3. The dumpster located in the drive-up parking area shall be removed. 4. All applicable Code requirements must be met. M *► i•JoRWEt e--,'uRT Le,T I f7LocK I Nor wFsT 21,10 Aoornt= rJ )/ / /. , 7 fYl'/fI46 16e IT 4 i6 (re, RENvo.l`I 114141/4. EXISTtue. SITE LIbNT rat-E(ToU.)\MN / 4P r 1 1EY1 61-PASS LJ,NE /> •( ,JEW LAN6 t)IvIDEIZ `�_ .�.s� Nip,-,_ _I Pw AT �t I .,\ • , ' 1 II1 �, hi -i ,. / eRIb11N6 � o TREJ: T ' Q , \ `� REt•AA 10 / \ ' xt'7 iIFI6 i ‘ . ■ a ■ 4\ /D / / 1, z.,/, .. \0 4.” .74 '.. t ioRT N • yxAt E ICI= 4c5 os.rti.....■ •t SAIS111111.1141 ` f JpRWEST BANK Mtl1+ 1 �� SITE PLAN aSSID*ii. s _ EAcaIiN erfRE F-271 ti_- __-_---_-_-- -- _., ---r---'Pi .,j _ _ . . , . . , ly . •I �30'-0'PUBLIC (STREET ; IoI I I «. 1 BUILDING SETBACK 4 �� -� I-, f a;,• -- - --- -r--- ° I PARKING ,,,, �'0 ~�`++, ,� I i N DECK . , / I••- H+-- _� S��SPAO ES �, , 6,.0. -- -_ I� • 1' ' U o fi a m 3 H.C. SPACES X , T I V to en •._ . KIST/ND 20'-0' DRAINAGE' j ! �+�,/ / UTILITY EASEMENT I �,\y PROPOSED OIIFICE BUILDING ----- — — — r I i '\ J — — - .STORIES •EMbVE EXTSTNO CURB & - I - -/ ! J'� -` 0\ %IIUMNOUS AS REOD.fOA r i PEW CURB CUT. I .l I ®` -ATCM BR.TO MATCH EIIlTNQ. // _\ L'` � � \ / � cy.2 / . ,el / • ' \e'_:12. e `'' r /I' / / , r , /' / 11 --- -- (( '.mob. 1! `` 7/-,, /, , i i pti C,. CXIST�10 ' ��y ,e4� I? /// ' 4•CURB / i ' MPLOTEE'S - ' '-.- �"j��c�S, j j/ ARRMG � / er ,� \ , 10 / . / / / EXISTING BANK M . N -. 1 10'-0' SIDE YARD " / .r • :BUILDING SETBACK 15'-0' SIDE YARD 1 . PARKING SETIBAtK • £ DRAINAGE & UTRrty EASEMENT j PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT i (- ,, (APC 9128193) ExIsTINC-1 -- w J3IEVJ ATM INI}y-cNINL tor£I2rf LINE J I v vlv1v15.16. IsLD ;" a. o'' 6' 9- 0' "(446 ATM ATM LA■JE s ( FS"( Ass L^NIE 34, ! •es a.a_Rs;wc• 1.IoRWEST BANK MINT Sac.Ti or.t .'� fROf�sEC 9Y PASS ssiti ins - En,Ga� cPFtcE •.c 4;e•-:11r--- - ^ ! / LM.I S/ATM I.MJ rz •le e a-l116C 9-sl o F°1 LAT K 1O ' R o f .,e. e.c 1 la o• •01J,•V•• o C�.6�•.rJ WSJ SS%L1 a COMM.HO'NN.1E4 DATE 4..1.9�DAAwWDV✓ SHEEt WIMP Agenda Information Memo September 21, 1993 City Council Meeting PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY SETBACK VARIANCE/WESLEY CONSTRUCTION HIDDEN VALLEY ADDITION B. Variance, Wesley Construction, of 15' to the required 50' building setback from Pilot Knob Road, for Lot 1, Block 1, Hidden Valley, located in the NW 1/4 of Sec. 22—An application has been received of Wesley Construction for a 15' variance to the required 50' minimum setback from Pilot Knob Road for the above referenced lot on Michelle Drive in the Hidden Valley Addition. For additional information with respect to this application, please refer to the Community Development Department staff report which is enclosed on pages through for your review. The City Code requires that a hardship unique to the property be demonstrated to qualify for a variance from code requirements. The applicant indicates that the remaining buildable area on the site is too small to accommodate a home compatible with the neighborhood within the required setback area. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny a variance for Wesley Construction of 15' to the required 50' building setback from the public right-of-way of Pilot Knob Road for Lot 1, Block 1, Hidden Valley Addition as presented. / q7 SUBJECT: VARIANCE APPLICANT: WESLEY CONSTRUCTION INC. LOCATION: LOT 1, BLOCK 1, HIDDEN VALLEY ADDITION EXISTING ZONING: R4 (SINGLE FAMILY) DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: SEPTEMBER 21, 1993 DATE OF REPORT: SEPTEMBER 14, 1993 COMPILED BY: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT APPLICATION SUMMARY: An application has been submitted requesting a 15'Variance to the required 50'setback on Pilot Knob Road for Lot 1, Block 1, Hidden Valley Addition. COMMENTS: Wesley Construction is requesting a 15' Variance to the required 50' minimum setback from public right-of-way to alleviate a perceived difficult building restrictions on this lot. The applicant believes the lot configuration (narrower in the rear) combined with the 50' setback from Pilot Knob Road leaves only 40' of buildable area and does not have any building plans that could fit into such a small area. The existing homes in the neighborhood are priced in excess of$160,000 and a narrow home would not appear compatible to the developer. In May 1989 a 10' Variance to the 50'setback was approved for the lot directly south of this lot. Wesley Construction feels that if any design could be found to fit the lot with existing setbacks, the street appearance would be lessened because it would appear quite"off center" and squeezed onto the lot compared with the neighboring homes. If constructed at the 35' setback, the house would meet all other setback requirements. If approved, this Variance shall be subject to all applicable Code requirements. .Y . °.,F - .•..tsu„ f Ctrrlll+..% . ..c v illinift: . .,.. _rE it; : 11E44 • . 4•Wellfr . \-. 7'' -• - '6''.. 9- ,5, ft -- ' I fr*•+ n•C« O !•', _;W f/•1 d+'••,- C Rigd‘'. Wesley Const, Inc. �j ��. it 11/C./ �� ti.` 1t v( Ill i 1 ` ∎� CITY or EAGAN �\ 4 II It, III t N J _.�� 013-76 h ( �� ih III => i ) ( III Ih -O- \ 111 I!I \ -n- -( y 111 _ ._ _- - -\ y,� -0- It� II _ _, i i 111 ,. - -^-.�� 1 11i ~-,_JJ 1 111 I �II �- 1 r'�~ 1 111 l l ��. '� I) \�.�a 11 . III — .�/---.. I � .k nom"" a 15 tiL�`i. l�T I t Z 1 \ ..,//\( K .� t III, III ) L� ` t I 7\11 4 III- is T\� ' 1M-, ] \,k l ): 1 \�_, 1 5 III II M 1 ( 1t - I )I I 1i1 IIRw 1- \.<_-- ==-j - - _(.; ,.,y . _ III III II \ C - �� i.l, F„1-; ;� 1 r \ ...,_k� I I I ' 7 '`�� 1 L 1 I1 ill, , ) ' \∎ N■�, `■\.-' Ill 3. ‘4::::7 111 S' II ; $� e� l0 I 1'1- / N" .`'1... _ • {i ITO 1„ \ter. •, / ,,� 11( n II 11 4 �" // .0 ,,, irt:3. Pillill'-.4.':- ._ d e■ir ± f3. --ci,,,o. --- Z - \ v - 0 a, ,, ___4--- - 11 I . i_ ..-'...- '1. . '.- \ \ \ 4 / ,i t V. '\ 14. x ( r , sill ))) c4fi -t I II Oil 1µ; '� c - - • Iii Y�iI , ' ;. — . -O. I / ''-■_ -e // III' ill )i I ) 1 1 4 4' 19 on,� SK(;' ®AL�� , o��� o0 x li 111 I I RI 1 e Rw IT, 4 =� - s a 3;�. . ..) >♦11� I'I , f-\-. f 1., �,�..� 1 _�_, r)Ti 00 or 11 f{) LL' iI r tl *(Pii \\ ';I f millI,eau iy// --. a=== t -- - - - VP na J. { 'rr.T' , �x ■o a ar ro P P,f W(7 — — (,-q . 4t 7472 tnle,r,ke t...461, U It * ►iendotn IIe1Q',1! MN 5S17n * P I O N E E q (e12) eel-1914ro1 en1-�4ne u,O s02c, S •em tMOt ong neerTn© t R ,:.. • ► vir, 7 . o•nc•S 1$75 IIIQ .ny In ►L.Ih.n•1 14- vin.. MN SC434 41 * * s "(15l2) 7153-1eno•ror 7n3-1FR^3 Certificate or Survey for Wesley Homes, Inc. House Address: Michelle drive. togon, MN With Variance S c'191-5\.0 - 1 1 1 )_.__-) o " t 1 r i 1 ,e_.--r— co n t v1 1 ,1 0 I ,ao J ut C°7 p o t ca m• cr - SftY NV'S! te \ to ., t 1 24,0 1 d pn S.o - I -Ie,15 0 1 O _, r' 1 o r t v1 J V' J O n -s- N 6lR a 1 N I N 1 z tt•• t Y 1 I- -- - - ; - 1— I 1. _ 35.00 L-85.i f��' S 89.59'05" W R .. 313 " -- - MICHELLE ()RIVE t- • .000 Denotes EvIstIng Elevallon PROPOSED HOUSE ELEVATION •riooln Denotes Proposed Elevation lowest Floor Etevalinn: Denotes Drainoge & Utility Easement ?op of Block Elevotlon• penotes Drolnoge Flow Dkectlon Garage Slob Elevotton: --o-- Denotes Monument ___ei . Denotes Offset Nub SeorIngs shown are assumed LOT 1 • BLOCK 1 HIDDEN VALLEY DAKO1A ro1141Y MINNESOr4 ew.., iww s•A•A•,I•.. A,, 1 I..$.,15••1,1,0,, ,,,,.,.,..•f,PI•^w, 0,,,,w•,C'.n••«I M 4.''NW tVIIIV h ♦fl.. ...«M I4...4 A .wv. v...,,..b.,••..,,,H.S,•..e,M,.•...01U 41..••4 049 gr.Asa', A. ,I9.1._ s Mch, lees .. ., 1 V .- h Scyle 19 _ C Cert11lcut3 of 5'Jtvwy rot: Wesley Homes, Inc.. 1't()l1RR Addr ts: ktoten . utlyii .ya(},_Mt4 l Without Variance S 695' t` ■ c .."-------::---: -:te-14,..f --' .4) , ' rc'f' • .� \ x,5, 1 \ 1, tr. Q 1 1, t.,+∎., O - t L. to \\ ,,, se moo M V -I \ • C) to 1 + Z : : : 1 \- \ 1 I— O ��f r,.1Ei EL 3.,.OU 13'04'03' S E39'69'05' W R . 373.41 • MICHELLE ORNE. 1 Sole Denotes Existing Elevotlon pRopoSttp HOUSE Elf-V/0104 •r1 3 Denotes Proposed Elevation Lowest Floor rlevotlnn: Denotes Drotnope 1c Utility teeement top et Block Elevotic,t,: Denotes DroinoQe T1ed Dtreotton r op et Stab E.levatlo►,: - ._e._ Denote' Monument .-44-,Denetse Offset EUub 8eortnpt st,ean ere assumed LOT 1 _., BLOCK 1 HIDDEN VjLLLY oAKOTA MINTY, WtWWtSOtA Scale: bL ••.t • 5771 12314.02 __. .._ . _... 7412 Ent•�p•l*• O,�•e * * * Veneolt, IleIghte. U4 55110 * r I O U , 1 ...o (612) 601-1914.ra% 661-9465 e YeK� ( * * ereinep �...KR :l.17 •t«ts vs ►nsh.ey in rlMt«,et,.t Biok,•. to+ 55434 * * * ■ _(612) 753-1eeo4row 7e3-1AA3 Certificate of Survey for: Wesley Homes. Inc.. Clouse Address: Michelle Drive. Einar?, MN. With Variance / - 1�3 o •5 6 95 i'1 /i\' 1,... J / I / \ .c.--T— �o •n •11 \ \ N I 1 t Q I lit 0 ' \ ip 0 ' o \ LO A s.c NoesE 4 \ r+ o I � I \ o ID'� I 14.0 \ i 0 ° � J I 0 ` \ �' •6112. ., \ O m N I ~ t Z I , 2z,e \ Y 1 \ • -4—i fc o —-7 , O 1 J 35.00 1-=85.18 - AR .,. t 313. S 89'59'05- W R A7 - _ _ MICHELLE DRiVE t- • •xo Denotes Existing Elevation PROPOSED HOUSE ELEVATION . ooln Denotes Proposed Elevation Lowest Floor Elevation: • Denotes Drolnoge & Utility Eoeernent Top of Block Elevation Denotes Drolnoge Flow Direction Geroge Slab Elevation: —o- Denotes Monument __mss._ Denotes Onset Hub seortngs shown ore assumed LOT 1 , BLOCK 1 HIDDEN VALLEY DAKOTA COUNTY, 1004E501A I 1»••bv,...of,th.t MN,•r..••.toe.,.+ • N■.p4,�O'T••M M••`a v.:*•..v e1.Rt wor,41.,e..-4/..N 1...,1H.,v flp:,,wt.4 I.*4 t•”...•. n*,r 1M I..,et H.,t1N•et I..-,,, t>NM tt.N Id.J..L.A.t I.t r1•PT A.O 1.55. ( C;-C):;4- n.,Arn• w t!VII t•.,I ■ l 1 I . r C i.r N ) c , . U -a, : \\\,, 1 E - .-- i w1' , ;-._-� ,Ty l — o r-) ET-1 6 ' \. 1 1 r.• _ _ . - t , r {,�„1 � /.,4' � II — - -- ���� � I-• _ � Ili I C cts b , / ��,�, � 1_►_ 111 Ell ( ► I I ill I I I'� °s a) I , , F 1. .11i, 11il1��11 z it.10 \ \ 1 OR 11 I1 _ oC11 11_ i �I , .ni.- 11 li \ s ly 1 . _ ❑ 1__.1111 [I C. 11..-11 _ t I Eli-1E11—__ 1 1, i \\ \ � qF. , -,0 iht ,-t: },I • Z)3 Agenda Information Memo September 21, 1993 City Council Meeting SPECIAL USE PERMIT/CHRISTMAS TREE SALES KNOB HILL PROFESSIONAL PARK C. Special Use Permit, Bill Brabec, to allow Christmas tree sales on Lot 3, Block 2, Knob Hill Professional Park, located in the SE 1/4 of Sec. 21—An application has been received for a special use permit to allow temporary Christmas tree sales on vacant property located at Knob Hill Professional Park. A special use permit has been granted for Christmas tree sales at this location in previous years. For additional information with respect to this application, please refer,to the Community Development Department staff report which is enclosed on pages through(o for your review. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny a special use permit for Bill Brabec to allow Christmas tree sales on Lot 3, Block 2, Knob Hill Professional Park as presented. i do L..-' SUBJECT: SPECIAL USE PERMIT APPLICANT: BILL BRABEC LOCATION: LOT 3, BLOCK 2, KNOB HILL PROFESSIONAL PARK EXISTING ZONING: LB-PD (LIMITED BUSINESS-PLANNED DEVELOPMENT) DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: SEPTEMBER 21, 1993 DATE OF REPORT: SEPTEMBER 14, 1993 COMPILED BY: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT APPLICATION SUMMARY: An application has been submitted requesting a Special Use Permit to allow temporary Christmas tree sales on Lot 3, Block 2, Knob Hill Professional Park. COMMENTS: The applicant is requesting a 100'x 100' temporary Christmas tree sales lot on undeveloped property located between Knob Lane and Pilot Knob Road from November 22 through December 24, 1993. The proposed tree lot will be open: Monday - Friday 3:30 p.m. - 9:00 p.m. Saturday 9:00 a.m. - 9:00 p.m. Sunday 12:00 p.m. - 9:00 p.m. The applicant has sold Christmas trees in Eagan for the past four years. If approved, this Special Use Permit shall be subject to the following: 1. This permit is temporary and chatl expire after December 25, 1993. 2. All signage will require a sign permit and be subject to the one-time sign fee of $2.50/sq. ft. 3. The permit shall be subject to all applicable code requirements. =ck1 ... .,.. ._.6.. _•wOpp �'f re cR OO[T 1 ' f: _ . ia• av ,. i i Mc 30 1 Lt eT-.. (t €A . _ ' A. QNj C pO� fir._. '� 1 . ,,� ' = 1, FDC r.,,t ten—, e S.iF D fJ , � S I ... ..- ii.:757 fir' 1 drabec- Special Use Permit / 1: \ Z1) \ 14y 4C1 ft e. / .. ... .ii: p1 i c t .•s. . y:,� � rt. 44.1 try•, r- "'yr-44%► • • I • • 1 1. .. 11 , t1 .1 s 4 1 MI. 11 1 /1 w•1-.j..r .. �.. ... r':.'..- ,.- tii•era. ... .. ,. .i - .-.-._. '' _ ',�M _. tl // . ' f --'H, ' i1 a ,' r : tom + , I II ..g....,,7 H. n.. __ . ? 1 % '', N t \, . ,e ei)...._ _ 1 I ' .."•; •11,1„ 1 (144 se ; . . . ' ' t 1 + r .�t „, ,j i t 1 r _ r.e.r /.I .• , i ♦ �.. . • 4 r' (., .• ,� - '' t ~ ' .11, !° ' ~ . ~ BEAUTIFUL SAVIOR NDS -/;' - `. w1 ` `k ° I FIRST I : �s Q 1 { \V :ar ( j..1' 1.r., 41u AM:111*ft to ,,iQV• 1 • 70 W AbbITION tot 4 •I .yli • \ / �� . •• 1 t- •w►w� r Mw ' . 1 •1 • ,o Q�Q . HIL;LTOP ♦ S \ Il t 1 --1s" , ►_ /0- 1 .s. q . •D r t 0 1 ii ..- 10,,Y__ 1/Atl issrail a.. _.. _ `Z ,�' . 4 �Q) i R �. - 11 ; v32 -01 1 031-01 ' • I t • j - I h ..r 1t r t. _ 0 w ,�_ . ♦a. ih uusiof 1 1u,.el I ♦. (4' Wt.t • !:!!I ... ill ,t 1MII •..•M w.l •M/. MO tl I it 1 ( UEi%' IWAo l R I 1.4..1. �, ._ sun, ,.h,..____ 30 !mil- ��_ I 4z9_,0 CO Agenda Information Memo September 21, 1993 City Council Meeting SPECIAL USE PERMIT/CHRISTMAS TREE SALES THOMAS LAKE CENTER D. Special Use Permit, James Bartizal, to allow Christmas tree sales on Lot 3, Block 1, Thomas Lake Center, located in the SW 1/4 of Sec. 28—An application has been received for a special use permit to allow temporary Christmas tree sales on vacant property located at Thomas Lake Center. A special use permit has been granted for Christmas tree sales at this location in previous years. For additional information with respect to this application, please refeA to the Community Development Department staff report which is enclosed on pages. D through .'for your review. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny a special use permit for James Bartizal to allow Christmas tree sales on Lot 3, Block 1, Thomas Lake Center as presented. c 07 SUBJECT: SPECIAL USE PERMIT APPLICANT: JAMES BARTIZAL LOCATION: LOT 3, BLOCK 1, THOMAS LAKE CENTER SW SECTION 28 EXISTING ZONING: CSC (COMMUNITY SHOPPING CENTER) DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: SEPTEMBER 21, 1993 DATE OF REPORT: SEPT E BER 14, 1993 COMPILED BY: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT APPLICATION SUMMARY: An application has been submitted requesting a Special Use Permit to allow temporary Christmas tree sales on an undeveloped lot at the Thomas Lake Center shopping mall. The applicant would begin set up around the 10th of November with sales beginning on November 26. The sales operation tear down and clean-up will be completed by December 31, 1993. The applicant has been granted a Special Use Permit for temporary tree sales at this site for the past six years. If approved, this Special Use Permit shall be subject to the following: 1. The permit is temporary and shall expire after December 25, 1993. 2. All signage will require a sign permit and be subject to the one-time sign fee of $2.50/sq. ft. 3. The permit shall be subject to all applicable Code requirements. /fir ., t,C� . III ✓`c<� ': '�j`` I • .� Z ^off CCw[t S , 14, �!W 0411.°(. `.. -er 4� ,,-, S1 E y l"CC��"41,101' of C `gyp _ '^� : .7...'“ - e Alk -b, "e Hof- 1 i=."." - r . .►, .A AO �,.M� s -'t ► ^ '� C► [FROM/ '.�` Os < or '_ f N e ayr 4 ` I\aliF r .e.A.€ :: I I( co,!■ ■•■■■/'"a11-.":1 ' %,. frehe■i- 1 ap- 17 --''' ' Dvo14 exY1211101 ti • --) Nu: 1/ .I r: ti) J N Cjil I 74--F4-1 , 7 N a - r ) Z-1 0( ft.e. 1.....9. J J A. . i 9F m : :.. .i1 o i P 446, : , G .0 g F - z 1..... c) -0 ,t JL ° . 0 i <, 1 le u: t u: o � 0 e g "41 13 I ID 0 " i t • ,(3-e`A . Agenda Information Memo September 21, 1993 City Council Meeting SPECIAL USE PERMIT/CHRIS'T'MAS TREE SALES TOWN CENTRE 70 - 2ND ADDITION E. Special Use Permit, Troop #510, to allow Christmas tree sales on Lot 1, Block 1, Town Centre 70 - 2nd Addition, located in the NW 1/4 of Sec. 15--An application has been received for a special use permit to allow temporary Christmas tree sales on vacant property located at Town Centre 70 - 2nd Addition. A special use permit has been granted for Christmas tree sales at this location in previous years. For additional information with respect to this application, please refer to the Community Development Department staff report which is enclosed on pages through02/ or your review. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny a special use permit for Troop #510 to allow Christmas tree sales on Lot 1, Block 1, Town Centre 70 - 2nd Addition as presented. a �� SUBJECT: SPECIAL USE PERMIT APPLICANT: BOY SCOUT TROOP #S10 LOCATION: LOT 1, BLOCK 1, TOWN CENTRE 70 11TH ADDITION EXISTING ZONING: CSC (COMJ fUNTTY SHOPPING CENTER) DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: SEPTEMBER 21, 1993 DATE OF REPORT: SEPTEMBER 14, 1993 COMPILED BY: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT APPLICATION SUMMARY: An application has been submitted requesting a Special Use Permit to allow the temporary sale of Christmas trees,wreaths, garland, tree bags, and tree stands„ COMMENTS: As a fund-raising event,Boy Scout Troop #510 is planning to sell Christmas trees for the fifth year at Town Centre. This year, Troop #510 is proposing their lot to be located abutting Town Centre Drive in the WalMart parking lot. Sales will commence November 26 and cease December 24, 1993. Clean-up will be completed by January 1, 1994. Hours of operation are 11:00 - 9:00 p.m. Monday through Friday and 9:00 a.m. - 9:00 p.m. weekends. If approved, this Special Use Permit shall be subject to the following conditions: 1. This permit is temporary and shall expire January 1, 1994. 2. All signage will require a sign permit and be subject to the one-time sign fee of $2.50/sq.ft. 3. This permit shall be subject to all applicable code requirements. .� _ 7,_-,) , -- 7---3 rr-- 1 if , rPE ? 1 ! 14W,i 9 w..a wd V .1 ,—;t5,n 'a ., k I 1 J 1,1 `` i I� `. j) iJU' If. irro w ,•'"/�• i rl I ill irf r;r7 , ' r 1 VT 1 1 a y,..1111 A. 12-0 021( /r • / li Z--_; �+ ,'• 1,., , e r `1 ' r i . ` I h t'1" t•1' I; p ./// ,i/J� A I ��}} t,vi 7 1 •,fir 1 1\ tp' 11413 ./ �. fi ^', J`y//� I ii• • ` / ' jf.' ` a4i ^ 44, I _f.0-=_t1'�{•(, /i•/ / / ////� `• ` `�� /11•,1 /�•3 . r •• ••14.••••a►L ����.+ti�+.+-,r eJ• /r 7� , ✓ R�� ' \ /� 1 — _ ��,/ // ,/,i'/ '' ,/,il1tt•• r�fj1•'.'srj•---.�--• it h '1, I ;1:,1/('a�// ' /�� ! r� !, (ice•' f Mlklll: 1 I 1 • • ,t , ,w ‘ lc l' 1 rt ! 1 g r I AM yr VI k /• Ail 1/ ' V" 1 ,' 44\ , f ‘. . I AI.,4,46:[..ra-aee.r•et+4, '"1" ..°4----1"' r • C /. /'J ,,, .i y 1..1.1 ., 1 �11�^'{, t 1 k [ ,..if i• r "P �/'//. r� ��I �S ..,t,n, ra 1 ::J AM IAA' �1 ttl •T, ,•0� � y 11'1' •1 1 4\ ji-L—.--7141----1 -1 (4 1 1 r/1, —_\; 1 1 I t i “I., •,1 h n I --! • :,4 r> 1 r� 1 I j • ` ::::•::Kc :::: 1t 'm czvi 1E 70 Eta tl1thi11 At►t11 1IL) •41 1 1----' , /.7 1 ,I'‘, ; )- -;l i +r" 1 11 1 . • „Tl'ili, \ ,— -- ••' RI-�w 1 ',. ' J t,. .-i . ' e''''-. --------, -- z' • 131, 4v-11 14\ . ,.7". 7 Il A . V 1/1 �,r, ‘ I e ! •\ 1114 ,► -'� Ra (qtr-lnt•f1 ► '=IT. 3 fA % • r� w �� R 1 ► s• `�i / 1 -- 1 ft t t 44? 1 1 , �• ' raw tall tit i • 1 t1r 1 `► 1 1 ' `1'A'f7ti k4,. tit •y ' , C l -1��D -T - .ewa 1 I'\ `T�_`1w' •'=------ -r -_• it, 0 1 I + .. ., 1�/�,� S1tt(`'I ;VI.S/' �f • j1I t' 1 i■• 1 1 1171 •T • C a(6L-- Agenda Information Memo September 21, 1993 City Council Meeting SPECIAL USE PERMIT/CHRISTMAS TREE SALES PARK CENTER ADDITION F. Special Use Permit,Troop #345,to allow Christmas tree sales on Outlot D,Park Center Addition, located in the SW 1/4 of Sec. 30--An application has been received for a special use permit to allow temporary Christmas tree sales on vacant property located at Park Center Addition. A special use permit has been granted for Christmas tree sales at this location in previous years. For additional information with respect to this application, please refer to the Community Development Department staff report which is enclosed on pages through for your review. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny a special use permit for Troop #345 to allow Christmas tree sales on Outlot D, Park Center Addition as presented. SUBJECT: SPECIAL USE PERMIT APPLICANT: BOY SCOUT TROOP #345 LOCATION: OUTLOT I), PARK CENTER ADDITION EXISTING ZONING: CSC (COMMUNITY SHOPPING CENTER) DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: SEPTEMBER 21, 1593 DATE OF REPORT: SEPTEMBER 14, 1593 COMPILED BY: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT APPLICATION SUMMARY: An application has been submitted requesting a Special Use Permit to allow the temporary sale of Christmas trees,wreaths, garland, tree bags, and tree stands. COMMENTS: Boy Scout Troop #345 has received permission to sell Christmas trees as a fund raising event on vacant property owned by Federal Land Company. The site is north of Cliff Road, west of the Oak Woods of Eagan, south of Rahn Park, and east of Rahn Road and Target. Sales will begin November 26, 1993 and run through December 24, 1993. Hours of operation are 11:00 s.m. - 9:OOn a. Monday-Friday weekends t p.m. Clean up will be completed by January , 99 This is Boy Scout Troop 345's fifth year at this location. If approved, the Special Use Permit shall be subject to the following conditions: 1. This permit is temporary and shall expire January 1, 1994. 2. All signage will require a sign permit and be subject to the one-time sign fee of 52.50/sq. ft. 3. This permit shall be subject to all applicable code requirements. ---t--T ; 5► L—iii ii t k t' x}11!7. .rl i MI • . i qtn ■q�~• 04": k.V1 t 1�~ E Sw t---g ('0 ' --'1 i� 3 ' -,t \I, tt :, 4. 5f N'.'. r� =i, � i�t.E-219 i'm \ ,litt_.7„it_T.: pLot Iv 5 0 . /15 ' ' . '�r. ., if (, IV_ S.U.P. - Troop 345 1 t . ci.�f r I ` L Aa<E •• I PUCK I I CF.t1111E • ',y ?.nd AD1). ,,/- Rahn Park j 1 •% 021-00 1 I } I /g, ,4. �v•� smorwiwom. ,, 1._ ^•� --T.:7_' - - =.,1,111 I. ■ , 4 ,lyrt` iiir, t 0 c `\ __1,,, , , _ - := it• 7::�' ' , �.„•,•� — f•.� s + �l/ '/IS !IQ 's= i• 7 . I lQ _ / '``i`` Site I G�tl.ot D ■ . / C.3 ( _ ( II fl 1 w t t ou l ltor E u■ SI 1)--• \ 41 , `, •.. ., •. ,... Cliff Road .,\ -.. -._.____..-.--- - -cvvii%_ _.Ir _-.-_.....___----- ... - - -- - — - le:,71s Agenda Information Memo September 21, 1993 City Council Meeting PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AMENDMENT/RAHNCLIFF ADDITION HOLIDAY INN EXPRESS G. Planned Development Amendment, New Ulm Enterprises, changing the use from an office or medical clinic to a motel on Lot 2, Block 2, Rahncliff 3rd Addition, within the Rahncliff Planned Development located along the east side of Rahncliff Court in the NW 1/4 of Sec. 32--At its meeting of August 24, 1993, the Advisory Planning Commission considered the above-referenced planned development amendment relative to Lot 2, Block 2 of Rahncliff 3rd Addition. For additional information with respect to this item, please refer to the Community Development Department staff report which is enclosed on pages j3througli for your review. Also enclosed on pages a7throughe . are the APC minutes relative to this item. The APC is recommending approval, subject to the conditions listed in the minutes. It should be noted that a ninth condition was added which requires that the building be 80% brick of a kind compatible with Rahncliff strip center and Bakers Square. In addition, certain submittals received at or after the Advisory Planning Commission meeting are inch ded in the supplemental staff memorandum which is enclosed on through . ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny a planned develop- ment amendment for New Ulm Enterprises, changing the use from an office or medical clinic to a motel on Lot 2, Block 2, Rahncliff 3rd Addition within the Rahncliff Planned Development located along the east side of Rahncliff Court as presented. n I SUBJECT': MANNED ED DEVELOPZE NT AM ENDMENT (RAHN CLIFF PLANNED DEVELOPMENT) APPLICANT: NEW ULM ENTERPRISES LOCATION: LOT 2, BLOCK 2, RAHNCLIFF 3RD ADDITION (NW 114 SECTION 32) EXISTING ZONING: PD (PLANNED DEVELOPMENT) DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: AUGUST 24, 1993 DATE OF REPORT: AUGUST 17, 1993 COMPILED BY: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT APPLICATION SUMMARY: An application has been submitted requesting a Planned Development Amendment to change the approved use on Lot 2., Block 2, Rahncliff 3rd Addition. This site is part of the 17-acre Rahncliff Planned Development that was approved in.September 1988 for a mixture of commercial uses. The existing agreement allows a 12,000 sq. ft. office or medical clinic to be built on the subject 1.8 acre lot. The applicant is proposing a two-story 70-unit Holiday Inn Express. In July of 1993 an application was submitted for a three-story 63-unit Super 8 Motel which was denied by the City Council. COMMENTS: The site is located immediately south of Bakers Square abutting I-35E and does not contain any significant vegetation. An overall landscaping plan was prepared with the original Planned Development that the applicant has agreed to follow. This will provide consistency along I-35E and throughout the Planned Development. As proposed, the building meets Code setback requirements and the number of parking spaces shown exceeds Code requirements. A physical connection to the Bakers Square parking lot and the lot to the southwest is necessary to allow cross parking ingress/egress movements that were a condition of the Rahncliff 3rd Addition plat. No building-mounted signage is shown on the submitted elevations. A condition of the original agreement stated that all trash areas must be contained within the building except for the Burger King facility. Another condition is that no rooftop mechanical equipment be visible from the adjacent roads or I-35E. The proposed building exterior will be stucco with a blue, open seam gabled roof. No pylon sign has been proposed at this time. The original approved sign plan and the 1989 amendment do not show a pylon sign on this lot. Therefore, if a pylon sign is proposed, an amendment will be required. A ground sign is approved along Rahncliff Court. GRADING/DRAINAGE/EROSION CONTROL: A limited amount of grading will be needed to prepare the site for the hotel and its parking lot. The site was previously graded in the late 1980's with the Rahncliff 1st and 2nd Additions. The Developer will be responsible for submitting a detailed grading, drainage and erosion control plan as a part of the building permit application. Drainage from this site will be directed to the existing storm sewer on Rahncliff Court which drains to the south to Pond AP-44. Pond AP-44 is classified as a wildlife habitat basin and is a pond on the City's Comprehensive Storm Water Management Plan. The pond was reconstructed with the Rahncliff 2nd Addition to provide adequate pond storage volume and wet storage volume to meet the future development requirements of the Rahncliff development. UTILITIES: Sanitary sewer and watermain stubs have been provided to Lot 2, Block 2, Rahncliff 3rd Addition with the Rahncliff 2nd Addition project, City Project #88-NN. The Developer shall submit a utility layout plan with the building permit application. STREETS/ACCESS/CIRCULATION: Street access is readily available to the site from Rahncliff Court which is a looping street that connects to Rahncliff Road. The City reconstructed Rahncliff Road and the Cliff Road intersection during 1992 under City Project #609. Rahncliff Road was widened, a center median was added, and a traffic control signal was added at the intersection with Cliff Road. The Developer will be responsible for submitting a site plan and parking lot layout plan with the building permit application. The preliminary site plan submitted with this application shows a shared driveway with the Bakers Square restaurant along the north property line of this lot. Staff recommends that the second driveway opening to Rahncliff Court shall also be a shared driveway opening for the future development of the property to the west. This driveway location would conform to the site plan submittal with the Rahncliff 2nd Addition. The shared driveway opening would be centered on the west property line of this lot. If approved, this Planned Development shall be subject to: 1. All signage shall conform to the Planned Development Agreement and Code requirements. 2. If a pylon sign is proposed, an amendment to the Planned Development Agreement shall be required. 3. The parking lot shall allow cross parking ingress/egress movements. Easements shall be provided to the City prior to the Planned Development Agreement ratification by the City Council. 4. The Planned Development overall landscaping plan shall be followed. All green areas shall be irrigated. 5. A trash recycling area shall be contained in the building. 6. Rooftop mechanical equipment shall not be visible from adjacent roads or I-35E. 7. The developer will be responsible for submitting a detailed grading, drainage and erosion control plan, a utility layout plan, and a site plan with the building permit application. 8. The westerly driveway opening onto Rahncliff Court shall be shifted to the west property line to allow for a shared driveway access. ,79-8 RAHNCLIFF PLANNED DEVELOPMENT (Proposed Holiday Inn Express) • • • _ AUTO MALL , i, Bt.). IN3 1%•,•ef�I; I. `• tt. 1 ' t 1 1 r' i i •' /• ji 1 - y' , 1 ii �. a �. /r l ill / 1 ' i, . .l_y� 0 t `1 k\ l t �1 I . • •"' i,l/ r . / / .•tu) ., , 1 �' , I ( i ` ' 1 ' 1 / ' 1 , / I// I / / '°'ftk,'- CLIFF COURT--- `�\ I.,:,I 3� ,/ S4� �,` /;I; '7 J/ / , / , . -- • , • It t / I Vi 11 ' / /, -- \ . • , lel • ®. I. 1 i ; ss� 11 , • ,'r.4 ti I) — t`` .. •\ \ . v • e� • F� /' , /, ;� ,',' //,' // 1' (\I•.�r�. / i \ /,: _, $ t7 1 M , / ,, 11 �' I I / • 7 , •I• / h r 1 i/ i _L �/ / k_I BANK 1 ' •• /, s - /l114/� ,,. , , '7/ y• • • lr .__fit. r1 , �/� G RIP M C •S� 1///,/ , ,,'`' '///1 / �/i /7//�// • I % i , LEI 3„" r ///' //i / / �/ // // / //�i /-,�'. Pew - /, .' j j 1 (IS ,� \/ r /// ,', ..,...), ,,?,./.,/,,,,,,,,,.//,/ /' • 'AnEt : iiii //////: ///111• 711/1/ /.. / /:".7/r'/P4 r, �, • '/' 1 // f / '// / ' , /lY/j//, /` o •••• /e r.: • • .41a, , It /.; rib- , /1 42/./ ;1.0...•• 4/I , / '- - G\� \ N/ ' ' - /' //&iS f. /4 1•/ /l am• '•••• 1• ! 1 I'7'/ 1 \ \ \\K//�/"/4 / // /j/�\, / • /7 / , r I / - -1 // / r 7/ // r... ,...v,. /Sr „,, • „, ,/ //,7 / ' /4.te,. .. I / ,, - igif • ao . . . ..„ .,„/„‘ / .,e7,. ,,./.. , - ,;..., „, ,, .. :.... , ,.?... . , , , 4, „, , ,., • , ...,.. ....., /, , ,,,, ,, ), , /,. ,.7.. . ,. , , , . , , ,/,... .,. , • • i . . )//l/ lAk /d//4,761 // ' //./ •'"/ I . • • • I • "Ifi r / • // 1 f /./ i ,.. • / •• ./ .•/ •/'..1.. /.... • 1 I C,.....:(„<„/") \..) ■ .......... , \•,.%) i le i / 1-- -7= ) < — .... / ,l ‘ " 1111111-it --------- c / . j i. i In 17_ r - - 1.- --:-: , \ \ --, 1 l il = i _::::: \ i, 0 ,, 1 * / / ( IIIIL H � � f :,,, ,,, ..., ) , I � FIIi11 ∎ , t ! I� IIIII ! l (' a , ...?(:: - / r. , , / 0 • II-1 N s NN '/ 1 _ e . I _ +..',0►04 \ // v M , {1 0 N . 7 - m 'tee`0 \ I...\\N‘`..\\ * / .•1:9.-\ • Z Q J ' CL at Wi n i 0 1— Z W v} ro o`to ix a o Q i G� x W CO o Q W N w 0 cc a. 0 Cr =r 6-a 0 >< Q> OU I1 • 111 : O o O 1 1:C;) 4 I / •-wn.moot� N� '`P 1 c ..E 0 a. 4 (ail: (�40 E - • < W co I /1 ',r4 n o U K a • (. W fl 0 H z IN "- Y / t• . O / `_ J r. • o x w W — O o — •1 lip 4.i.„- — III U 1.• II IUIUP lit• • •z• • ,d,,,,i.)-- i —■ I —i i FAIIM i I. MI_ =HI mo• i ,@, 1 11 ��� �� t E OM NM i E 11.1 MI .._. - - - i.� 1-- lib BOW MI SE imo mot' WI all ho z ma i alt ■ • ® — — , 1n Il€ a < 1•1, • ', _.E Of ME • -= 5 lit 0 - .e :G m= up i ��— �= _ -- fig !_ O .-E i2 F- - < /11 -_ 'moo Mz /4 «.] 1 III III= W - ,_ t 1=N in. . W Z ...1>♦` !E ` O Z i= i`= . 1�• ■0 IN_ INr. lia4mm < :' El =2 r-I-1 IE._ ...., - lb _ «- VJ WM .T loimis _ •� E i�- E < — Ime Z 1 I•E al N. g I .......„._ _.__. _ _, _ i ,Nmo am E il C a ' . !II Y--. r� •- -. 'u. T I�X AP-2-4-4s 77 2. 1 •8732.25-- r-',+• 8 0�� ./ s -i ^y ,fir( 9%O. N 1, . :.t i,.:r ! t BT8.2-, B80.0 �L--11 .900.0i \7 ,.Rr, _909.8:` 6-pc_w,a `,` e°q is 12' 18` .• G''r�. , v 9/6.0 - . t '- 333 5 I cS'`C, I �� :`� B 1` T':'�r' 9ti 9ggc 98. A-cc r' �.P : 1916.0: _;• ••:� r t 'g 1577 AP=2 /4,--•11T 90.E - aA. 7 . C5 AC1-iy �./� 889.3 /,� i� �. �'�2 AP.-49 X900,2 (v 'I r% _ 840 C I L A C ,� 'rct,/ A ,49. -,..,1 .....11....915-� T 9 \AP 1912.1 •S E Q J z0 i[ 855.0 �.C-91b.0= 080.5 �' -.� 30120, •. �A,9ZQQ ,,,_24,,,,,7 AP-50 85.0 MA .:BP; 2 't 1 886.0 895 .<, c ar r9 60>�r .8� �; :Zf -- 892.0 lle_in A -i • I!"��J 5' ' -jT3s.1I_._,..,::92,9_.9. -9 1 P 5a.2`t( A 4-1T'U+ ^`„ bi935 0 rt_ II --,_,A- "� 90U.4 �� �gg: �� ,'W-f t 9.37.9 ,� 1//f: -QaT BP-32 9 } �'9Z�6 933 9 t�' i� / � SITE 9 ', RAayA , •�4,, „J.:: 937.9 ....i 1 � ,10Bt './640,&m-'- vel_■". .- ;.;,`1-, \-4--'I.R I D`- - c-\js."1""7 2 9 �``� � 0 z T / ,' y 4.-,,�2 LZ4yA' c /mot v � ^� X4:9 ° 1._ _ '--- ----- .-t --\\A.,„,6,-'p' ,;-.-4 934. - z.8LP-,4', , BL I 1 i - ) 9/4.8 9 262 " <+ dr- 9I 1.0I"1 I > {��P-3• I 9/3.5 I �. -4i , ` 'y'-, 'f wpb il, _� •". ; •p ;` ' ..-% %...,^t .f 'r ./JJ' //i�926.0 A• - /., L.S.;19 'r771:.' BLP-59 �� .. 940.0 E 992.0 'Z,, OAKCT(COUVTY P...n 893.3 �S� �` , i -t, F $944, �. .0,„„4A-yy 900.0 LP- i ! ' �� \'' t r 887.0. \ - \ ' 7'). 'BS i i BLP-i _; 0/0.0,, a 1 911.6 .-..•��L� ' .. A-:: 1 1 9/7.8 • FIGURE No. 17 • STORM SEWER LAYOUT • . • . • MAP � . • • . • CITY OF EAGAN9c4 • . . N _u� ,� 17. r•,r .w ,r'C.-." I PARK ' r /L. , IV M I _I , r, I ,, 11111;111 4 1 TT1 ��, .`�t---(112, 1 a . ,,...".),.... , --r-- —7-;,. , , , , , O,_ 11111//Ul// R:MN --� / ''��L'1 \t- 14,P-, r t PARK j w J >� ,I y^'�� r\\�, .•. �L.. - ,64 i:,`„.41 18,Ali /- ��11 � `,/// / 1' TV,.s ,r !' aliondi:7 • , —,". 'Tr _ l r11 �Di _I Da:OTa 3�LiFF l ///� 1 II W s1L �' ?, Lih' �`- , �" /I f1n 71--i- 12 1Tf VEp 1AR� " r � n[n il: � r 1.s 1 .' . `i';;r, ' SITE _ 5 %j'/ -,, 1 - F7D 4.t;, 1.' 2r 4 /� �, r ■ �,,1 _, • i L:1111�1 1! —T I — "12 , a`IT �\, y �� ` . —.1•'J r, ,,_ i� f_ C , „:s ;DC '1 ;, ��• Jill f r he4 u - a ' l •, ll1�T,'�V/ �, /A �p,' T., -t jiTlj�l -, , 1, • i''&17[' * / �I - 17-1rr'4, _' ,/71177 T-1+(�5 R f;GF Cl IFF F�4N '\li \\\ W' S i i A �" ♦ DAKOTA COUNTY PARK I 2I r /'''C .1;41- s ./.11 ,./%•:>:>11-"-" \- • trip: 1,v • FIG. NO. 7. • . 1 1 SANITARY SEWER TRUNK LAYOUT 1 CITY OF . EAGAN &/ • A k'il 1 7 1993 _______ August 13, 1993 Jim Sturm City Planner City of Eagan Eagan, Minnesota Dear Jim: Just a short letter to let you know that I support the idea of a new 70 room Holiday Inn Express on 35E and Cliff Road. Eagan is in need of hotel space and I feel a development of this quality would enhance our hospitality business and give us the added hotel room we need. Sincerely, • f , 1 ' 604„4 V tj /1■:4°W.)‘'‘' Norman C. Storbakken Group Vice President & Chief Financial Officer Blue Cross Blue Shield of Minnesota NCSry CO Page 14/EAGAN ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES AUGUST 24 , 1993 NEW ULM ENTERPRISES - PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AMENDMENT Chairman Voracek opened the next public hearing of the evening regarding a Planned Development Amendment changing the use from an office or medical clinic to a hotel on Lot 2 , Block 2, Ranhcliff 3rd Addition, within the Rahncliff Planned Development located along the east side of Rahncliff Court in the NW 1/4 of Section 32. City Planner Sturm stated that the site is located immediately south of Baker's Square and the strip mall abutting I-35E. He noted that at the present time no pylon sign is proposed and mentioned that the proposed building will be constructed of white stucco with a blue roof. Gerald Danheim, a representative of the applicant, stated that the proposed amendment is a 2-story, 70 unit Holiday Inn Express which will provide meeting rooms and complimentary breakfast for its guests. He further stated that the hotel's target clientele is business people , Eagan residents' weekend visitors, and the area's new tourism visitors. A resident from 2023 Pin Oak Drive, stated that the hotel was not consistent with the neighborhood development and that a medical clinic or office building would be more compatible with the area. Diane Hoey , 1355 Cosmos Lane, expressed her support for the proposed planned development amendment, reasoning that there is a need for a hotel or motel in the area for her business associates. She also stated that it was her belief that the hotel would be good for businesses in the strip mall in that it would give that area more traffic. Member Heyl stated that the City needs a hotel more than an office building. Member Isberg concurred with Member Heyl. Member Hoeft raised his concern as to the exterior construction material of the proposed building. Mr. Danheim explained that the hotel's building would be compatible to the neighborhood buildings, that it is to be constructed with a white stucco with a brick facet with the hotel's focal points being the pool facing I-35E. Mr. Danheim further stated, in response to Member Hoeft's inquiry, that Holiday Inn Express is not restricted by the corporation from using brick , however, it encourages compatibility with other Holiday Inn Expresses for visual identification purposes. 1 Page 15/EAGAN ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES AUGUST 24 , 1993 A discussion with respect to the compatibility of the hotel's exterior construction material with the other buildings in the area, i.e. Baker's Square and the strip mall north of Baker's Square, ensued. Member Miller proposed to add a condition which requires the north, east, and south side of the motel be 50% brick. Member Merkley suggested the hotel's exterior construction be 100% brick. Member Hey' indicated that she was against requiring the developer to use 100% brick stating that by doing so the Commission would be "micro managing" a business and the Commission should not control a color scheme used for identification purposes by a business. Miller moved, Hoeft seconded, the motion to approve a Planned Development Amendment changing the use from an office or medical clinic to a hotel on Lot 2 , Block 2 , Ranhcliff 3rd Addition, within the Rahncliff Planned Development located along the east side of Rahncliff Court in the NW 1/4 of Section 32 , subject to the following conditions: 1 . All signage shall conform to the Planned Development Agreement and Code requirements. 2 . If a pylon sign is proposed, an amendment to the Planned Development Agreement shall be required. 3 . The parking lot shall allow cross parking ingress/egress movements . Easements shall be provided to the City prior to the Planned Development Agreement ratification by the City Council. 4 . The Planned Development overall landscaping plan shall be followed. All green areas shall be irrigated. 5. A trash recycling area shall be contained in the building. 6. Rooftop mechanical equipment shall not be visible from adjacent roads or I-35E. 7. The developer will be responsible for submitting a detailed grading, drainage and erosion control plan, a utility layout plan , and a site plan with the building permit application. ;IJ)1 Page 16/EAGAN ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES AUGUST 24 , 1993 8 . The westerly driveway opening onto Rahncliff Court shall be shifted to the west property line to allow for a shared dr- e..ay access. 9 . A exterior sides of the building shall consist of 80% b«ck compatible in size and color to that used by the strip mall and Baker's Square. All present voted in favor. P(21 1 MEMO F city of •agan TO: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR REICHERT FROM: CITY PLANNER STURM DATE: SEPTEMBER 15, 1993 SUBJECT: RAHNCUFF PLANNED DEVELOPMENT At the August 24 Advisory Planning Commission meeting, the Planned Development Amendment to allow a 70-unit Holiday Inn Express motel in the Rahncliff Planned Development was approved unanimously. This site is located immediately south of Bakers Square along l-35E. The area was rezoned from Roadside Business to a Planned Development district in 1988 and was designated for a medical clinic/office building. A neighborhood meeting was held on August 16 with five residents in attendance and only two residents attended the Planning Commission meeting. There was considerable discussion regarding the building exterior finish and Condition #9 was added as follows: 9. All exterior sides of the building shall consist of 80% brick compatible in size and color to that used by the strip mall and Bakers Square. The applicant has submitted a revised site plan that places the easterly ingress/egress totally on the lot while keeping the shared one on the west property line. A landscape plan needs to be upgraded to blend in with the surrounding area. The plan also calls for seeding and sodding should be required for better erosion control. The applicant has submitted a letter agreeing to meet City requirements. Also, attached is a letter of support from Michael D. Haverkamp of First American Bank Metro which was received after preparation of the Planning Commission packet which was handed out at the meeting. If you would like additional information on this item, please let me know. Y P City Planner JS/js attach. / / • . 411 ii '� • EXISTING Ou40wG i� M i� RAHNCLIFF ,.,-- . - .. ---,„,,,,,y . ......e..•• 4-• •-•:■ PA/‘ O aO{ ;tc*.c. , i r‘it,','e q). i 4r O 1:5 ly n 0 J ../ , a■ b • • " &-'- S - • ..9 .,6 (V (r i / O • i.. " o / -'..--' 7/ w / • C 4 AA , 9 cjVi 41.6 r ,. /A O a� .� s,• eo G 49 @:),/i .r .o---€., •t SITE PLAN Felt Nose RECE VED - ccpn1tgo -22-3 L . j \?"" .V ICF n,,, RAHNCLIFF r� •� TT --9L� --- �f • /ANN �:� t" sc p IL/ f y' t 1� aoir io �. .� 2 t, o s r c o ,121..„. _ �1�1 // tir 4. /`� oc' 4 7,- -� ri u� � QVh Vv v o•s �• • �d" O� sow /N N, 1110p 1 4,33A `t1 �' yid Gj Wilt& g -" '\ ,�� �rNn, 1 t �' 1,�1 �V t, OV "oc ,� r' ' ,�P QQV V / I b LOO• .b - S/ ��. ►.. \ / N •L � ° b I t M. v/' 0 0.4... 0 40/ \e' -1/ b � b 0 b/ J O u O•-----• `s k 0 _\ C , ', j., (6' a L • / 4 o,4i 4. 1 pf--,J.5 � / \. lite_ a • .44, a .. i r... -- - 0 1- I- $- a- f- 1- • /- L) J • Ja t ti SO ao d 1 at X � 5 3 3 5■ N N= • N I N N 40 N N in 0.11 N N1 v C. 5^ u u J J it( R as L '�i °15 ° to d o[ N �. V N — JK Li. s/-• 2 6, g LE 4A m a 04 d m W3 ° a J 1w itJ t • h- aL .-r - .s Y C: 1 D 11. •-y a A. Li 0.-- 2 Li CC 0 Z d Z7 i DC v v Cie 7 i . .2 at iic u as 4,01 .. v W - V as Z V N L9 • 2 I- ZZ d . Z .-. W O - Z Q V 1 W h- - � � W� te • L.3 Z n 411 u • _ i Z to v z LN=i.1 g ..i .4./ i i aC g in g z t � � '''ce La ..+ N � R R LD .J.r .J... i H ✓ W LLJ H I- N_ N H 8 a z — L � � 3 L=.J g R ci d° A. c. a 1 N d --� — — — — wit OW 0 v L, J m e — 0 C. u A. V1 LO / ?..- 33 n D Hospitality Builders, Inc. P.O. Box 4090 615 Camelot Drive •Aberdeen,SD 57401 August 4 , 1993 605.229.5945 Kim Eggers City of Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55122 612/681-4690 RE: Eagan, MN Holiday Inn Express Motel Landscape Requirements Dear Kim: Per our conversation on Tuesday, August 3rd, you requested landscape plans for our project in coordination with the surrounding development. Since I do not know the names and types of trees in the surrounding landscaping in the development, I am writing this letter guaranteeing to you that the developer will conform to the existing landscaping scheme. The landscaping on the Holiday Inn Express project will match or compliment the existing landscaping of the surrounding properties to meet the satisfaction of the city. If you have any questions or problems with any of this, please contact me immediately. Sincerely, HOSPITALITY BUILDERS, INC. LA4 J• J. . okales Ve Pr`sident Projects Administrator JJK/pjb cc: Steve Warren Thomas Helling Emmett Erpelding First American Bank Metro .. Memoe &remer FinancLa'Corporal on south St.Paul Inver Grove N.IgPrta Eagan Mo..wMe Watertown 633 So Concord Street 6800 Cand,Avenue East 1995 RahnClrft Court 1715 W County Road B2 301 Terntoriai Street East P.O Box 359 Inver Grove Heghts.MN 55076 Eapan,MN 55122 Roseville,MN 55113 P.O.Box 398 South St Paul MN 55075 (612)451.8581 (612)452.2265 (612)633-4097 Watertown,MN 55388 (612)451.6822 FAX(612)451.8581 FAX(612)452.8037 FAX(612)636-9203 955-1916 Metro(612)4461446 FAX(612)457.9093 August 20, 1993 RECEIVED �1�; 3 1993 Mr. Jim Sturm, City Planner ________ City of Eagan ------ 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55122-1897 . RE: Advisory Planning Commission Hearing regarding New Ulm Enterprises' request for plan development amendment, changing the use from a medical center/professional office building to a motel on Lot 2, Block 2, Rahncliff Third Addition, located along Rahncliff Court in the Northwest 1/4 section of 32. Dear Mr. Sturm: I have reviewed the proposed Holiday Inn Express project at the above referenced location with Mr. Tom Torgerson, President of Torgerson properties. The project as described to us would be an enhancement to the Rahncliff development. The facility appears to be of high quality and profile. It is a two story building that accommodates quality rooms, pool facility and meeting rooms which could be utilized by the community. The Holiday Inn name is a National Franchise which provides additional merit and long term stability to the facility. Based on our knowledge of the proposal this facility would be compatible with our building and other surrounding businesses and, in our option, this project meets the test of equal quality to the original plan and development use of this property as a medical center/professional office building. It is our understanding that the Advisory Planning Commission for the City of Eagan will consider the plan development amendment change at its meeting on August 24, 1993. We encourage the Planning Commission and City Council to support the necessary zoning change to accommodate this particular project as proposed. Thank you for your consideration. Yours tr 1 , Michael D. H verkamp - Executive Vice President MDH/tds cc: Thomas R. Torgerson Agenda Information Memo September 21, 1993 City Council Meeting PRELIMINARY PLAT/UNITED STATIONERS ADDITION R.L. JOHNSON COMPANY H. Preliminary Plat,United Stationers Addition/R.L.Johnson Company,consisting of one lot on approximately 12.4 LI (Light Industrial) acres located along the south side of Alexander Road, west of Highway 13 in the NE 1/4 of Sec. 8--At its meeting of August 24, 1993, the Advisory Planning Commission considered the above referenced preliminary plat consisting of one lot of previously zoned light industrial property located at 1720 Alexander Road. For additional information with respect to this application, please refer to the staff report wh. is enclosed on pages 37through for your review. Also enclosed on page g approval are the APC minutes relative to this item. The planning i commission is recommendin a proval subject to the conditions noted in the minutes. Also enclosed on pagerbis a memorandum covering the recommendation of the Advisory Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission which heard this item at its meeting of September 9, 1993. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny a preliminary plat for United Stationers Addition/R.L. Johnson Company, consisting of one lot on approximately 12.4 LI (Light Industrial) acres located at 1720 Alexander Road as presented. SUBJECT: PRELIMINARY PLAT (UNITED STATIONERS ADDITION) APPLICANT: R.L JOHNSON CO. LOCATION: NE QUARTER SECTION 8 EXISTING ZONING: LIGHT INDUSTRIAL (IA) DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: AUGUST 24, 1993 DATE OF REPORT: AUGUST 9, 1993 COMPII.ED BY: COM NNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT APPLICATION SUMMARY: An application has been submitted requesting a Preliminary Plat consisting of one lot on approximately 12.4 acres located on the previously-platted Lot 1, Block 1, R.L. Johnson Addition, and a portion of Lot 2, Block 1, Sibley Terminal Industrial Park located at 1720 Alexander Road. The property is zoned Light Industrial and is designated Industrial on the Comprehensive Land Use Guide Plan. EXISTING CONDITIONS: United Stationers currently has a 150,000 sq.ft.building located on Lot 1, Block 1, R.L. Johnson 1st Addition. The site is east of the railroad, south of Meadowview Road, west of Alexander Road, and north of Terminal Drive. The applicant is proposing a split involving the northern 80,000 sq. ft. of the 5.12 acre Lot 2, Block 1, Sibley Terminal Industrial Park Addition and combining it with the R.L Johnson lot resulting in the new 12.4 acre Lot 1, Block 1, United Stationers Addition. COM] 1ENTS: R.L. Johnson is proposing this replat to accommodate a future expansion of the United Stationers building. Currently this building covers approximately 28% of the site. City Code allows a maximum building coverage of 35% in the Light Industrial zoning district which will allow for an expansion of approximately 11,000 sq. ft. Acquisition of the additional 80,000 sq. ft. will allow an expansion of approximately 40,000 sq. ft. for a total building square footage of approximately 190,000 sq. ft. on the 12.4 acre lot. There are no development plans with this proposed plat. According to the applicant, the timing for a building expansion is undetermined at this point. That 80,000 sq. ft. portion of Lot 2, Block 1, Sibley Terminal Industrial Park, to be combined with the adjacent lot contains a shed that shall be relocated a minimum of 30' away from the Alexander Road right-of-way and a garage which will be removed prior to Final Plat approval. 337 GRADING/DRAINAGE/EROSION CONTROL: An existing building and parking lot is located in the northwest corner of the proposed development. The southwest corner of the development is vacant and the property that the developer is acquiring in the southeast corner of Lot I is essentially undeveloped. The south property line contains a 30' slope that is quite steep and suspect to erosion. The applicant did not submit a grading, drainage and erosion control plan with this submittal. Detailed grading, drainage and erosion control plans shall be submitted for further review by City staff, the Planning Commission and City Council before any construction can occur on this lot. The drainage from Lot 1 of Block 1 shall be directed via a storm sewer system from the existing and proposed parking lots of this development to Pond CP-8 which is located along the southwest edge of this site. Pond CP-8 is a pond in the City's Comprehensive Storm Water Management Plan. An existing 48" storm sewer line does exist along the north edge of this site and the line drains across the railroad tracks into Pond CP-9. WATER QUALITY AND WETLANDS: This development is located in Drainage Basin C. The development will generate stormwater that will discharge first to Pond CP-8, then to Pond CP-9. Pond CP-9 is a flooded gravel pit with a maximum depth of 45 feet and extremely good water quality, though it is classified as a nutrient basin in the City's water quality management plan. Staff will discuss with the Advisory Parks, Recreation, and Natural Resources Commission whether to re-classify this pond to a recreational use. Staff will also discuss with the Commission whether to recommend to the City that it require an easement for a future storm sewer line that will divert the flow from the existing 48" line entering Pond CP-9 near the Alexander Road terminus to Pond CP-8. This easement would preserve the option of re-routing the 48" line which currently discharges directly to CP-9 through Pond CP-8 for pre-treatment of stormwater discharge. Finally, staff will recommend a cash water quality dedication based only on the additional lot to be secured by United Stationers as well as that portion of the lot south of the existing building that will be affected by a proposed building expansion. The developer has not submitted any wetland report for the site. It does appear that a wetland located between the existing building and Pond CP-8 could be affected by the proposed development. To facilitate compliance with the Wetlands Conservation Act, the developer must submit wetlands report to staff by Monday August 23 in order for this item to be considered at the September meeting of the Advisory Parks, Recreation, and Natural Resources Commission. These recommendations are subject to the approval of the Advisory Parks, Recreation, and Natural Resources Commission. UTILITIES: Sanitary sewer service has been provided to the existing building on Lot 1. Sanitary sewer service drains to a at station on the west end of Meadowview Road. The lift station pumps the flow easterly along Meadowview Road and Alexander Road to a MWCC interceptor line that is located along the easterly edge of this development. Water main service has been provided to the existing building from an 8" line that runs along the southeasterly edge of the building. The 8" watermain connects to a 12" watermain in Meadowview Road. Before any building expansion can occur on this development, the developer shall submit detailed utility plans showing bow sanitary sewer and watermain service will be provided to this development. The utility plan shall show how fire protection will be provided to all sides of the existing and proposed building. STREETS/ACCESS/CIRCULATION: Street access is readily available to this site from Alexander Road which is a bituminous street with concrete curb and gutter. Meadowview Road also abuts the lot along the north edge of this site. Meadowview Road, which is a gravel street with rural ditches, was proposed to be upgraded in 1991 (City Project 615), however, the City Council denied this project. The upgrading of Meadowview Road was proposed to include a 36'wide bituminous street with concrete curb and gutter and a cul-de- sac on the west end of Meadowview Road adjacent to this site. Future building and parking lot expansion will require the parking lot to be constructed to City standards with bituminous or concrete surfacing and concrete curb and gutter around the perimeter of this site. EASEMENTS/RIGHT-OF-WAY/PERMITS: The final plat shall dedicate 60'of right-of-way for Alexander Road and Meadowview Road. The final plat shall also include a drainage and utility easement for a future storm sewer line that will divert the flow from the existing 48" line on the north edge of this site to Pond CP-8. The existing utilities that are located within this development shall be field verified and easements shall be dedicated over the existing lines. This development will be responsible for obtaining all regulatory agency permits prior to final plat approval. FINANCIAL OBLIGATION - UNITED STATIONERS Based upon the study of the financial obligations collected in the past and the uses proposed for the property, the following charges are proposed. The charges are computed using the City's existing fee schedule and connections proposed to be made to the City's utility system • based on the submitted plans. Improvement Use Rate Quantity Arno= Because no utility plans were submitted with the plat application, no financial obligation is a presented in this report. At the time of building permit application the charges to the property for City utilities will be reviewed to determine if a connection or availability charge will be collected. 4239 , CONDITIONS OF PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVAL FOR UNITED STATIONERS ADDITION 1. These standard conditions of plat approval as adopted by Council action on February 2, 1993 shall be complied with: Al, B1, B2, B3, B4, Cl, C2, C3, D1, El, Fl, G1, and H1 2. The garage on site shall be removed and the shed located along Alexander Road shall be relocated prior to Final Plat approval. 3. The final plat shall dedicate 60' of right-of-way centered over existing Alexander Road and Meadowview Road. 4. The final plat shall provide a drainage and utility easement for a future storm sewer line that will divert the flow from the existing 48" line along the north edge of this site to Pond CP-8. 5. Detailed grading, drainage and erosion control plans, utility layout plans, and site plans shall be submitted for further review by City staff the Planning Commission and City Council before any building expansion can occur on this site. 6. The drainage from the proposed development is required to be directed to Pond CP-8. 7. The development is required to upgrade the existing parking lot to current City Code requirements. 8. Meadowview Road is required to be upgraded in accordance with City Code requirements. STANDARD CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL A. Financial Obligations 1. This development shall accept its additional financial obligations as defined in the staffs report in accordance with the final plat dimensions and the rates in effect at the time of final plat approval. B. Easements and Rights-of-Way • 1. This development shall dedicate 10-foot drainage and utility easements centered over all tot lines and, in addition, where necessary to accommodate existing or proposed utilities for drainage ways within the plat. The development shall dedicate easements of sufficient width and location as determined necessary by engineering standards. 2. This development shall dedicate, provide, or financially guarantee the acquisition costs of drainage, pending, and utility easements in addition to public street rights-of-way as required by the alignment, depth, and storage capacity of all required public utilities and streets located beyond the boundaries of this plat as necessary to service or accommodate this development. • 3. This development shall dedicate all public right-of-way and temporary slope easements for ultimate development of adjacent roadways as required by the appropriate jurisdictional agency. 4. This development shall dedicate adequate drainage and pending easements to incorporate the required high water elevation plus three (3) feet as necessitated by storm water storage volume requirements. C. Plans and Specifications 1. All public and private streets, drainage systems and utilities necessary to provide service to this development shall be designed and certified by a registered professional engineer in accordance with City adopted codes, engineering standards, guidelines and policies prior to application for final plat approval. 2. A detailed grading, drainage, erosion, and sediment control plan must be prepared in accordance with current City standards prior to final plat approval. 3. This development shall ensure that all dead-end public streets shall have a cul-de-sac constructed in accordance with City ttY e n engineering rin standards. Jqi( • 4. A separate detailed landscape plan shall be submitted overlaid on the proposed grading and utility plan. The financial guarantee for such plan shall be included,in the Development Contract and shall not be released until one year after the date of City certified compliance. D. Public Improvements 1. tf any improvements are to be installed under a City contract, the appropriate project must be approved by Council action prior to final plat approval. E. Permits 1. This development shall be responsible for the acquisition of all regulatory agency permits required by the affected agency prior to final plat approval. F. Parks and Trails Dedication 1. This development shall fulfill its park and trail dedication requirements as recommended by the Advisory Parks, Recreation and Natural Resource Commission and approved by Council action. G. Water Quality Dedication 1. This development shall be responsible for providing a cash dedication, ponding, or a combination thereof in accordance with the criteria identified in the City's Water Quality Management Plan, as recommended by the Advisory Parks, Recreation and Natural Resource Commission and approved by Council action. H. Other 1. All subdivision,zoning and other ordinances affecting this development shall be adhered to, unless specifically granted a variance by Council action. Advisory Planning Commission City Council Approved: August 25, 1987 September 15. 1987 Revised: Jul 10. 1990 Revised: February 2. 1993 LTS*S STANOARC CON , /\ 100 1 , •- I/ N. — / 1 / / / ' • /' � � 021101 I 01061 i' \ I -1 o cue, 1 I , % \ 1 Ii - - j'--\-- \ ;Ilk.--I` -Ji \_ ,_ 1 �� % 1 = ?!_ 1r �.�'=_ I 1--;�---•_ y r J (1 1 II 1111 010 02 /1 ll '/// //�, f,'�y _ _, III \111 10 1 �/1 /// /// /' rl'' .. 7 U0 -•• I I 11 1 // \( "i/ / // / / ao- .\ � -N l 'll/tl i f l .1 j ji. 0., //ILL' • • - -- - _ioo=J \fit — -- - _—+_ � I/ � //s "���� -�llf/ _ . _ _ _ ., t' Illl/-//i// •s\q--1//` /I//III?S 1 ' - 11 ��1 1 /,•/ � 111,/ 'III) :. _ r \ / ' �/ f \ • I - / !■ &,•-• /•\ i �j/ '-/ cr/1/ c➢IV f , //k f/I \ '� 1 III//// / ,.., " 'ye1 /' /If111 'r/1 (t/ y 010 03 ' / f /'4 ( � / 1/ 1 \( 1 .%/ /•l3 , / II, (7/I 1 1 S4, 4,_, ',f l III//l l/i ///.:5// ,//y:'r- %/?7// (4∎R, 1 // •2G fl / '/, .l-I, --�. \vvAvAI\ Gil ' ',(��l�aj ,(3 'A 11> ) ,I 1; _=. t_T• .ti I Ti \ /�" 11/ ,�'i�\ \\�I'11111111 ,'i/'/(1,- lei / 7 i '' ` I• � 1 � , v �ti,. / ill ' \ lII) 111 J� �'� rr . l .. At/ A I�t0 1' I 1.r• I� \ v- I -�JL' I ,5i (r/ Y \ R p I Iii l i• ' f';'''-' '..• ,i - _1 / /ice \ ,/,;/, J \vl �. .�i_ 1 / y l i ✓ _. b- �.\, ft'A � .'Z� 1 _ _ 1 Y^ ■ ,;/J(f //f � '\ �'�'r t'.j/��,' �'�.�1;tvb/��;,,, � t)321)1‘\\ _ i;f11 t 0,.(e);) '' �) i l r'' !;-,,s ;� °� rf RfgI�A9. ��1�Y,RIAd ,1A!M•i Y l /,y l/% �i4 -.e_g �1 1 t 1 -,,-- b...__1,.. J- I , t ' �'y /f Ni✓ t 1.. v•\ •.•. \III • .� ..- 1�I`t...(�1 t.-) : . /c. r h s c albs � L I' ,I Y / ,/7. , . -r- - - " �1- Ir,/, '_,•,114-.1 ,,i42,:,0 I I `, I / ' I / I II'x, ;t` � ;� �'..�" - r- t f •,i- • , �l � ) )OIOb2 ' I 1 ,i q 2-q3 ,.....4._ 4■11 1E r . . imill . , 2 1 •7 i .."... , ,...... ...,..2\.,.. .. \ ■ .0... ..... , : 044/0 ..N... •- • 4 CO \ ffl.'''' ....Cr.....\.... 1 ..4 :r i 4(5•,: . '''\,<!.,): ''A . '4 4/4..'''''.%\.,„ ‘....•co ,0 0 ::....) .. ..‘',.. ...fit s ■,,,. . a - ' e ..-..) '''''•.,'''' . .''''' 4:`,.:).',,4id 4,,,y4 ss'''"---,... \---_ ..... ,,,.._,-. ..... ■ ..., •,,,94,...„.. \.,,,.., . --.-- '-,-- t., ) _,.. 111 , •=-- • . : \ im - ..., pi ; l'''''''''',.•. \. ,./....■....\ ••• 4, ; .4. in Pil 1 ;,, •, • % t / 1; ,,.- /Th . : vt ts...../ '.(•,. "4,< • '... • '7," ... k. . ■ ••E, , •, i.,i _:= / \ •,...,. -.. - ,.. ; ..i-i...„„ ,, i i ii Tr: / .\ 7.-- ,•./.: -....., ,; ..,,, . :•,/ / / irr% . f.... •;: a.r . -.....:..1. ‹..)... r ' II-,k , i:: • • . \ ---•."...7"P. ,..,.,..........(■._.,.'‹... .....,„ ...• .._r e 1:7 •0. .c - / "••,..\\ ■ ,; .'/ / i •i o 1!:: i: $'''' • .:.,... .. > ..• =. . .. . ....,- . . NI • ;! - fi- i, \ \' . •-■ - - .., _,•3-‘ ...„.•--...gi.. : 4- 71 , X.c.... .e.-.1 •••••\ •! .• '•• t4a ".."•-••• .a Z ' .....tc1C'.. - • . i • ,/: i N"-- - •• - va ...- -,.. ....,7. .t. / , fr, .., - " cn \ . -,.-'--• 4 ` .i-Th, >\ A -•:_--, ..i / ...,-- , ... , ..--- ..--- -. .......„ -- t-- _ .. • ..-. ...--- •. .-• ....-- ,....• ,.., , ..... _ \ \\I c.. ...... ..-,.... .: . < Z = - 3 '-.- ...) -, k, •., t. - s-w rrj •••••, cr. i •1 ,.... • • v% .. .6 t' Aar. k .4 • 1 • S. .t-i ...il c 7:. •1 ..._,.. . , • ,,D t • a - •0 Z r r • 4 E. i. c•\ . .. :' : aig ft. / •-'i = . ... i ... /.... / C...* .. . ..--r' • li 4. •. / 7% C .... •I 4 / As 0 A 0 ' Si. Z 47/ Cf) g "2" -----.'"42%-ec...:' AN•, ?•-- , .N. 0 •• n I:: ...•A a.•••■... ..... . . .....,... .......... . 7 t: 0 ..•.4....7... ...I....7 L. 'Pi ; = C...) '2 .. 2, / •911 = . E > / / 74 C i MI ,?, • P< I I I t 1 I 5 m i z > ti . ›.. < . !I - I •- • = «.., ..e . >. ..< 1 I 1 1.—■ aa "0 i 2 - i C 0 . I i • 1 I I I ;I' Z H 1 2 II 11 I 1 i-........— ■...L. TAT / ----- ,-.//,.; ,. L. /I/ f,, H____.• • 1. //1 - •- a ,� f AT ��� �� r. _- —.. ', It�l1��S ..• a' --,� ,_—E Y '- b i o / a. ! i // -...-• • • al. ' 771 if(79 i'.0 4.-k.1°''s. ‘1.,.' / ► rn. - .. • . . 36_ 1 ! " ' I1 �, . i r • •• , JOHN • I I ; • � _, �-• Ist ICOACMN,GP I• .. __ g 1 -t2- -,1 -Y T ,M� - A 044.-g SITE 2 `,� ,unLAkO1 T Eagan - , ) : • •Inter Ceptor 4��� 301 s or _ �� � � `,� FO X • �`� • \ / r^ RIDGE !�// • No 1 \Neste f 30/ . • • FIG. NO. 7 • S ANITARYSEWERTRUNK LAYOUT CITY OF . • • • AGAN . . • N • . . .,,,, 0. t •.1, .. •• N., , /II. • / ! ' t- I . ra .• / •. ., ' 33 • 67 p • / i. ...•.•/1; -. : ! 11 • _ .1 - • /,,,,,,,,/ . +.1.........;-ff---- ) ".."")... -- -.) )),) --1- , __. v 4,,,,,,,, _. _ // . ., ; _ \ ,.\,,,,i ___. . --,7ill' i4 Is i -• ' /-7 I'1 u r!! •a t;/'// y b 1.1.7 y / 0-0 Hi{i1+ s ` ...._ . r,. / Qty l i l _- ��. � .... o r , '._ - — �, CP-9 R.L. �a; L.,*` J '- .. __ .., 698.7 . JoMt...5- J CP-9J 2,, 702.0 “856.0^+ 8624 aLU_r I � C P _ �- • lib I- - ,/ / 7/9 71••••■4 tta ..�_� i/ • C—c • i GML�k� • - a, - .' � 2r' Ili' U IA 'kK r �s SITE \ -.7117:, "`��-I FOx PARK ���, ! C`0 - F-.. , , . RIDGE ua.� . `• , _ Bo2. C--71 s / L�' = t V v A D� o i .0 • • — - - J, .-. � _ No. I • P-7 / — to — -• R'2 � '/ . �� A69.4,65.0 // 823.5 [i+ / l /, )� 829.7 �a� .�. /. ��. AC/ .iii . th cp ' . . �` , h FINV) \ •,ti••••••• FIGURE No. 17 • • . • STORM SEWER LAYOUT MAP . . CITY OF ..._ EAGAN .• . - , , 1 1 7 . . Page 17/EAGAN ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES AUGUST 24 , 1993 UNITED STATIONERS ADDITION - R.L. JOHNSON COMPANY Chairman Voracek opened the next public hearing of the evening regarding a Preliminary Plat consisting of one lot on approximately 12 . 4 L-I (Light Industrial) acres located along the south side of Alexander Road west of Highway 13 in the NE 1/4 of Section 8 . City Planner Sturm stated that the applicant is proposing to purchase a portion of Lot 2 , Block 1 , Sibley Terminal Industrial Park Addition and combine it with Lot 1 , Block 1 , R.L. Johnson 1st Addition, resulting in a new 12 . 4 acre Lot 1, Blcok 2 , United Stationers Addition. He noted that the proposed replat is to accommodate for future expansion for which there is no existing development plans at this time. Chuck Youngquist , a representative of the applicant , concurred with the City staff report with the exception of condition #5 under which a grading, drainage and erosion control plan, utility plans, and sites plans, must be submitted to the APC and the City Council before any building expansion. He requested that for any expansion in the future, the developer need only complete a permit process, not a planning process . Assistant City Engineer Foertsch responded that if the APC does not want to review any such plans, condition #5 may be deleted. Isberg moved , Merkley seconded, the motion to approve a Preliminary Plat consisting of one lot on approximately 12 . 4 L-I (Light Industrial ) acres located along the south side of Alexander Road west of Highway 13 in the NE 1/4 of Section 8 , subject to the following conditions: 1. These standard conditions of plat approval as adopted by Council action on February 2 , 1993 shall be complied with: Al , Bl , B2 , B3 , B4 , Cl , C2 , C3 , D1 , El , Ti, Gi and Hi 2 . The garage on site shall be removed and the shed located along Alexander Road shall be relocated prior to Final Plat approval. 3 . The final plat shall dedicate 60' of right-of-way centered over existing Alexander Road and Meadowview Road. c .0 L' Page 18/EAGAN ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES AUGUST 24 , 1993 4 . The final plat shall provide a drainage and utility easement for a future storm sewer line that will divert the flow from the existing 48" line along the north edge of this site to Pond CP-8 . 5. Detailed grading, drainage and erosion control plans, utility layout plans, and site plans shall be submitted for further review by City staff and City Council before any building expansion can occur on this site. 6 . The drainage from the proposed development is required to be directed to Pond CP-8 . 7 . The development is required to upgrade the existing parking lot to current City Code requirements. 8 . Meadowview Road is required to be upgraded in accordance with City Code requirements. All present voted in favor . MEMO _ city of eagan DATE: SEPTEMBER 10, 1993 TO: TOM HEDGES, CITY ADMINISTRATOR i/FROM: KEN VRAA, DIRECTOR OF PARKS AND RECREATION SUBJECT: UNITED STATIONERS The Advisory Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission reviewed the above referenced proposal at their September 9, 1993 meeting and make the following recommendations to the City Council relative to United Stationers. 1 . Since the property has already been platted, there is no park dedication requirement. 2. There is no trails dedication requirement with this plat. 3. A cash water quality dedication for the site will be required and will be based on the difference in impervious coverage of the site between existing and future conditions. 4. The developer must demonstrate compliance with the Wetland Conservation Act prior to preliminary plat approval. This will include hiring a qualified wetlands consultant to determine the status of the possible wetland to the south west of the existing building. 5. An easement across the developer's property sufficient to all re-routing of the storm sewer along Alexander Road to Pond CP-8 should be required as a condition of the plat. 6. Future expansion plans for United Stations are to be reviewed and required to meet Tree Preservation Guidelines. KV:cm cc: Marilyn Wucherpfennig, Planning Aide Ed Kirscht, Engineering Technician Joe Merchak, Construction Analys• ��O Agenda Information Memo September 21, 1993 City Council Meeting PRELIMINARY PLAT/TOWN CENTRE 100 - 13TH ADDITION EAGAN HEIGHTS COMMERCIAL PARK I. Preliminary Plat, Town Centre 100 - 13th Addition/Eagan Heights Commercial Park, consisting of one lot and two outlots for future development, located along the west side of O'Leary Lane, north of Town Centre Drive in the NE 1/4 of Sec. 15--At its meeting of August 24, 1993, the Advisory Planning Commission considered the above referenced preliminary plat for one lot and two outlots currently platted as Outlot A of Town Centre 100 - 11th Addition. The purpose of the plat is to facilitate future development which is as yet undefined. For additional information with respect to this application, please refer to the Community Development Department staff report which is enclosed on pages.75a-- througl�(�� for your review. Also enclosed on pages g.D.through12!' re the Advisory Planning Commission minutes relative to this item. The APC is recommending approval subject to the conditions listed in the minutes. The Advisory Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission considered this item at its meeting of September 9, 1993. A copy of a memoralidum covering the commission's action with respect to this item is enclosed on pagece_Ci ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny a preliminary plat for Town Centre 100 - 13th Addition/Eagan Heights Commercial Park consisting of one lot and two outlots for future development, located along the west side of O'Leary Lane, north of Town Centre Drive as presented. SUBJECT: PRELIMINARY PLAT (TOWN CENTRE 100 THIRTEENTH ADDITION) APPLICANT: EAGAN HEIGHTS COMMERCIAL PARK LOCATION: NE QUARTER SECTION 15 EXISTING ZONING: PLANNED DEVELOPMENT/COMMUNITY SHOPPING CENTER/LIMITED BUSINESS (PD/CSC/LB) DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: AUGUST 24, 1993 DATE OF REPORT: AUGUST 10, 1993 COMPILED BY: CONgNNTTY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT APPLICATION SUMMARY: An application has been submitted requesting a Preliminary Plat consisting of one lot and two Outlots on approximately 5.7 acres of previously-zoned Planned Development/Community Shopping Center and Planned Development/Limited Business land located south of Yankee Doodle Road, west of O'Leary Lane, and north of Town Centre Drive currently platted as Outlot A,Town Centre 100 Eleventh Addition. The site is designated Commercial Planned Development on the Comprehensive Land Use Guide Plan. EXISTING CONDITIONS: The site was replatted as an Outlot as part of the Town Centre 100 Eleventh Addition (Valvoline Instant Oil Change). As part of the Valvoline development, zoning designations were changed in that the northern part of the site was rezoned from PD/LB to PD/CSC while the opposite occurred for the southern portion. The site contains scrub grass with no significant topography or vegetation. COMMENTS: The applicant is proposing to plat the .68 acre portion adjacent to the west property line of Valvoline Instant Oil Change as Lot 1, Block 1, Town Centre 100 Thirteen and split the remainder into two 1.8 and 3.2 acre outlots. There are no development plans associated with this plat. Access to Lot 1 is provided through an existing easement dedicated on the Town Center 100 Eleventh Addition with no access to Yankee Doodle Road. As a Planned Development, any development on the proposed Lot 1 will require site plan review by City staff, the Advisory Planning Commission, and the City Council. *c;- GRADING/DRAINAGE/EROSION CONTROL: The Developer does not propose to perform any grading with this application. Detailed grading, drainage and erosion control plans shall be submitted for further review by City staff, Planning Commission and City Council before any construction can occur on this lot. The drainage from Lot 1 and Outlots A and B shall be directed via storm sewer system from the proposed developments to the existing storm sewer in O'Leary Lane or to an existing 18" line along the west property line of this development. The existing storm sewer lines in this area drain in a northerly direction to Pond DP-5 which is a pond on the City's Comprehensive Storm Water Management Plan. WATER QUALITY AND WETLANDS: The proposed development consists of one lot and two outlots located in Drainage Basin D. Runoff from the site will discharge to Pond DP-5, a nutrient basin in the Water Quality Management Plan. Discharge from Pond DP-5 will travel through several other stormwater ponds before reaching LeMay Lake, the nearest downstream recreational water body. Because of the small site of the development and the intervening stormwater ponds between it and the nearest downstream recreational lake, a cash dedication will be based on Lot 1, Block 1 only and is estimated at $6,485. Water quality requirements for the outlots will be established when they are submitted for preliminary plat approval prior to development. There are no wetland issues associated with the parcel. These recommendations are subject to the approval of the Advisory Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources C::emission. UTILITIES: Sanitary sewer service of sufficient size, depth and capacity has been provided to Lot 1 and the two outlots from an existing 12" trunk sanitary sewer line that runs along the west property line of the development. Watermain service of sufficient size, pressure and capacity is readily available from an existing 12"watermain on O'Leary Lane and from an existing 12"watermain on Town Centre Drive. As shown on the preliminary utility layout plan submitted with this application, the water service for Lot 1 shall be provided by extending a 6" wa°,ermain from O'Leary Lane along the north edge of Outlot A. STREETS/ACCESS/CIRCULATION: Street access is readily available to this site from O'Leary Lane and Town Centre Drive. The future deve ;pment on Lot 1 will have its street access provided to it from the existing driveway of the Valvoline Rapid Oil Change development on Lot 1 of Block 1 of Town Centre 100-11th Addition. EASEMEN"TS/RIGHT-OF•WAY/PERMITS: The existing utilities that are located within this development shall be field verified and easements shall be dedicated over the existing lines. The existing 12"sanitary sewer that runs along the west property line is approximately 30' deep. Therefore, a 30' wide drainage and utility easement shall be dedicated along the west property line of Outlot B. Along the north edge of Outlot A a 20' drainage and utility easement shall be dedicated for the proposed 6" water service that will be stubbed to Lot 1. • FINANCIAL OBLIGATION • TORN CENTRE 100 13TH ADDITION Based upon the study of the financial obligations collected in the past and the uses proposed for the property, the following charges are proposed. The charges are computed using the City's existing fee schedule and connections proposed to be made to the City's utility system based on the submitted plans. Improvement Use Rate Quantity Amount Water Availability Charge $2,550/Ac. .68 Ac. 11,Za There are levied assessments with an unpaid balance of 52,659 on the property proposed for this plat. This unpaid balance will be allocated to the succeeding parcels created by the plat. CONDITIONS OF PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVAL FOR TOWN CENTRE 100 THIR'1>:..t N"TB ADDITION 1. These standard conditions of plat approval as adopted by Council action on February 2, 1993 shall be complied with: Al, Bi, B3, Cl, C2, D1, El, Fl, G1, and H1 2. Development of Lot 1, Block 1,Town Centre 100 Thirteenth Addition will require site plan review by City staff and the Advisory Planning Commission and the City Council prior to issuance of a building permit. 3. The Final Plat shall dedicate a 30' drainage and utility easement along the west property line of Outlot B for the deep 12" sanitary sewer line. 4. The Final Plat shall dedicate a 20' drainage and utility easement along the north property line of Outlot A for the proposed water service extension to Lot 1. 5. Detailed grading, drainage and erosion control plans, utility layout plans, and site plans shall be submitted for further review by City staff, Advisory Planning Commission,and City Council before any building expansion can occur on this site. STANDARD CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL A. Financial Obligations 1. This development shall accept its additional financial obligations as defined in the staff's report in accordance with the final plat dimensions and the rates in effect at the time of final plat approval. B. Easements and Rights-of-Way 1. This development shall dedicate 10-foot drainage and utility easements centered over all lot tines end, In addition, where necessary to accommodate existing or proposed utilities for drainage ways within the plat. The development shall dedicate easements of sufficient width and location as determined necessary by engineering standards. 2. This development shall dedicate, provide, or financially guarantee the acquisition costs of drainage, ponding, and utility easements in addition to public street rights-of-way as required by the alignment, depth, and storage capacity of all required public utilities and streets located beyond the boundaries of this plat as necessary to service or accommodate this development. 3. This development shall dedicate all public right-of-way and temporary slope easements for ultimate development of adjacent roadways as required by the appropriate jurisdictional agency. 4. This development shall dedicate adequate drainage and ponding easements - to incorporate the required high water elevation plus three (3) feet as necessitated by storm water storage volume requirements. C. Plans and Specifications 1. All public and private streets, drainage systems and utilities necessary to provide service to this development shall be designed and certified by a registered professional engineer in accordance with City adopted codes, engineering standards, guidelines and policies prior to application for final plat approval. 2. A detailed grading, drainage, erosion, and sediment control plan must be prepared in accordance with current City standards prior to final plat approval. 3. This development shall ensure that all dead-end public streets shall have a cul-de-sac constructed in accordance with City engineering standards. • 4. A separate detailed landscape plan shall be submitted overlaid on the proposed grading and utility plan. The financial guarantee for such plan shall be included in the Development Contract and shall not be released until one year after the date of City certified compliance. D. Public Improvements 1. tf any improvements are to be installed under a City contract, the appropriate project must be approved by Council action prior to final plat approval. E. Permits 1. This development shall be responsible for the acquisition of all regulatory agency permits required by the affected agency prior to final plat approval. F. Parks and Trails Dedication 1. This development shall fulfill its park and trail dedication requirements as recommended by the Advisory Parks, Recreation and Natural Resource Commission and approved by Council action. G. Water Quality Dedication 1. This development shall be responsible for providing a cash dedication, pending, or a combination thereof in accordance with the criteria identified in the City's Water Quality Management Plan, as recommended by the Advisory Parks, Recreation and Natural Resource Commission and approved by Council action. H. Other 1. All subdivision,zoning and other ordinances affecting this development shall be adhered to, unless specifically granted a variance by Council action. Advisory Planning Commission City Council Approved: August 25. 1987 _,September 15. 1987 Revised: July 10, 1990 Revised: February 2. 1993 9---75(P LTS*5 l.• •••■ ■•Inn r.nki _ S . • (Eb 'ON 'Od '0 ) a '3r'rN TDt < ; '41;'''''' <„ .. _.. ) , 0 " • 'lap ,.. .• W i , 1 Z 7 .• ID W CT ... .a 4 wd t \ V/ �� - tU W c. tC Z� i'-Z < gC '^N \r T a: L v ....... Qk . .1. W . ire v U `C "' pp M ( . N */ N «n. W . • 4 . �,� — Q Q 1 Z «.1 \, "' W iv .„.." ,. 7 . Y n //W . � , v.4. s W g i .A, K; s .. r J., J 0 N C � � _ _ ` U 'N`C1 C /. s+ Cr W 1 NUB;••- m /• e ` J Q J9Y W W E S U 0 f-Z =rt." 0 V I- Val irk 111' _ tflJlLS� ._ ' Y S Z I I :C* I W t I 0 ILI :c - W S«. J GA - ° f I � S$5 0 Za �_ �� I CVs,• r a Qa'�Wa=li • CV)et:( ......?,.. , I ;E " -.....Al.7".. ..:... ! n W W • I -I • a• : i iliii i = t • : t it 1 i 1 i I s =, P !�' s • ' i E � `t' i'i'i iii _.�z-- ,li € :� Iii+ '- 1 II to ii ii ! € Ft litfit : i IV til,3 I I ill " IT : a ' i ;If 2 4.: . . I 1 c i i i I:: :::i P O ; . i Ili 1slj: -1:11 t } : : : : : 1 li 1.6 111 i it3 L li 1 t E: li II:: f: t-1 1 Ft iii : E CrF ? !1: .t 1`I 2i t z I;t - E 1 1 1 i . ? t- to -i - 't-. i •111 i 1 1 1 4 i t!! i:%. f i t t e: 11 1 3 1 1 1 I l I�tri '�T� _ i� - / / 1 /. X11 i ,- '1 �. + `�,t� ''0 ... }} J I I I i ' ` `` , `I ` // 1 -- --- ,y.• y,, L _ ,-- x`,11, 1`'!.);; - ' ,,4,,..---,, ' t / -'- =..: ; , •+ — . N ! • ' i i 11 11 /. / 111 r i I 1,I It 11 / /1 if ill 1 ti y _ 1 I .a(S(� \1 S /-' 1 I I i ' 11' ',I'III I 1 + ' II ,'�Iii'I = I. V .'� 1 / ti/ t ♦ l I ' I ■II,1 I 111,1 \ ' >[ +1��� / \ , . O_ 1 1 11 I 11 11'11,t 1 , 1 1 I I O ■ t * ".rte. ♦ i \- ♦ I /I I I I 11 1 `\ 1 • s `� i ' ' • V I -;rt�j"------j -', a:::::;,/ i r'/ i ,t Vii. / i i '--y....s..0 1•T i . t ,-p-:- i d_ttlf.„.... ... . • I • i; • u 1 a3PjE Y . i 1 , a , ! 114 i i t 1 I . is..1 I s I I • .t • I I ' ; I. 4 I1 iR - 1 t l A 313 11111111 +'' I b. j► i ii,� ; � �, Iii. 11 ; 1 1 I = I. Ns ..11 , Z. . . j ,.. Ii= 4i i iii i :1 aI'1' Z >c I r i � `jljt 0 > �t�� j st a 1 - C9 �i 3i ii i Z 3 iii i Il Is. • • I I 1 I i € C W iti Q W Ii :1. iji ,1 13 I _ . . t I t i _ "t i i Z z1; •ii iss iZ• Q f 1 11 i' It-i :II _1 t i 11 I = i = s Z ; 31 it ?_ :. t•{i�, sip :_ is _ _ _ . i r: i. i 1 }t ! 1 , 2� ;il' lit1 I ; _ =i I ` I . :1_ 1 1411 . 1:1 t - '11- 't1 1 : 1 i t •: w' 711; 1111 1 tit 1113 1111 tit t i .: ! i 1 1j* 1 I : 3 :i'. _ i i 3 - I i i 1 I S •t ,%' ,..! r�1�=Jof .1 is i 11' t ,�„'•' •%1 t' ', ;1 .'', ,; ' 1 i, 1,1' ' I''I, l p //No,' •":•' it I i , f I I I 1 1 I '■ 1 I I 'I' ' 4 r• !• ` 'i .1 II 1 ( I 1 i' / "1.:: 1 j.. .,v1 . , 7.,., .i \ ,,;1 11 1 '/ / (' 11 � _ I � 1, ,1 � 1 ,.., _, .1� � ';` ., ---- - .1 t ;�; lip .r ; � �, _ .,. . ._ ._ X11 / t 1/ / V• :- - �,i e 1 ,�•-... `•I `,II ".1 11.1, i,,,,// / i .,I>'' ��r.r�__ - �• 1 . 1 / • 1"1'1 '/ ' ', �' 1111 ' O /. �.aa�diS i{� a `t. -t '41 i 1111111 i IIi rit � 11e 1 ��I` �t ,.1 ( ' I I l l 1 1II/ 1 11 ',II O ` i..c ,'i \ .!' `•a__•', ,i/ 1 1 I :1;,; 111 , 1 1 � , .f ,r`--��,r —___�,- 11; I I t 1 1 1, 1 1 , i .� y,� ' � 1 1111,,1 ,\',1 1 , \ . I 'I '�$i `�- �.� 1,l--,?... .- - -"-.-- -,' '-1/'//1 ;i I i 1,1',,` , •.\1,11,1 '=,\1.a I 1• i fL.:) J F ---' t{ ' i 1 I 1 Y =�iaedil I i ii n j; I I it l ii r 01- S-e\ . • • • i:i--, riiii'di;Ni.7•.:....-.01 ei 3,1-7 "r? 'V ■ inum.". el.,y cr■.. 13 N _ ..:1 ..'4,,■ 1 DP* ,,II i .„...7Dir,9:31D 1715D.g v..7,LOP-IS 56 L—E 73.0 866.5 --F-i 864 ) 7.' ..J -,r—875,917i ,/.i... • vl I .--- ___„.. •-: S. OP---5 8313.3 855.4 CN1 hi7D6-i, u; A. ,,,Q., -e 76.Q ' _la] '878-2 1 r,fT7-..._ttr . le !I ' 28 --7.„---," -----------1---7 i. .,:___T__,17 —...... F.D.; \....=-'_._- To f5- 0. -a:— "7". D•j / ,U)! r• ),/,,,, k;-j- 4116-.9 PC' 0241 D. -20 .\1Z' ' ' E.' 1528;A...9' DP.IN 1 /.... ,,,:,...----11 1.,:,„,,,, 1 1 _9 0 ' .\i•;.. ;-,E 2N,L. 1-...-_--.J 2y2:35, , , 0. cEN7c—. E..4'.., --* ig 897 61T • i! -1:1-f -.7-1) . ,.p.- •85_4 21 .„. -* ' 56.0-CE , IN""a-. ."■---- 15',.--), -7-7 -: . t I ...,-, •.- '15 lib 1,41;ca .. tiliC,11.(1 ki :•-,ES2. .,. . Noi -'.:' . , ,..„?..../... . - .;,) 70 FSRST N 1 ,...., .., .... ,, .,,, , 7. ,,,: ).„..1,,. ........1_1___,, .. *48 SE ' C 4,-, JP-66). . ! • ;ics'.3_ ,..: • \:t. -w,..7.?._..-:± i L,., , jp..46 e /4-51z3n,";-7-1371.0 , ."----'''' Bea° 1 -ro,-,:•■•\;asi",,,H-,.: 1- -^7r-,DP.-'25.--! 1.±.--,eg .ry... 882.' ,r—,r.,!- 2/,',41-. ....,...\ . e5,, ,-/-4 ?,r1-‘.--, .7 1111p• BS6 4 i_Jr 4„ .5 r 'I ,°9•4.,1 :=1-1T-TipffV7,' --II". -7i?'-6:.., f17.--.-17:_;:=4.sCL" 2 .0.04 SITE .t 14, ;-.3.YJR'-tt.r''•-,----'- '---.---'' ' el:.--,...- /I-SS B.7,. 149370 j:::::;:.49-4e,k: Ie. rit-.4 76.0 kf ' -. -169/..7,. -.‘,8.-94.9 -. /... -42 .73,-. ' / - —if.. : -.-. ' ' ..':'• .r --- ' i - L.S.- I- .-- --, —.■ - ; 1 JP43 .1)- -5-.)0,`'.'4 \?: . ,.■'411,17—. JP••I I '^7'ril"947/..9 jP.-,32,J'668:0 ',• . S44,• '` . %-t‘ec,\:c-,'6. 1 t i F-'' ■ Legg 5,..Li?90.0. ‘, I . i....;.1. , ‘F.^, :-■-• •"4 i/. '-'' 1, , --- -- :„.„....-.------.0. JP•44 '-4`.-1; ' -'..; 7.4...t7z4L7-: ?!_s_ ---c)7-YrIT\''.---- J-i ' ---L--,- CITY 1 t. .:::: ::zt '01''IL • J. • • FIGURE No. 17 . STORM SEWER LAYOUT • . • . - MAP . • . . . . CITY OF • EA G A t c;-(c001) • .......„------ N 5'9/76-0 �1 % •' ..7.3.)-.,11p., /.,/,:.ii 10 / / �\ 1i 18 ,12 • -, 7) I1 / /� ,/ • ' (2r' 1r:, 15 O 6..0/x .0 '' / `�i `v VI . _ .5/ 557/ i6-----I- ((:?r, .0 .,'74 0 ;c r '/ i -, �, 45 .0 \;. 5 4/67 0 4/62 0 61.1/75 0 67.8/72.0 7a u pp / 20«'....�.•tg'i 69 ;,;., 18. 61 is" C=.3-113° F' 2C _ /�i' ' I , 12 lit l ■ I 18" 59 3/ 6) iT11 iKI L .. ' .� J _ 1 59 I a _ _ 4� / 7 _ i rt G l _r�t,`1 r. ti 69 0 C, Eegrxo �— 72 --�--, .4. 541,,. ii •8'` ' i 1 1' '�KV.':::: 496%72b- C' ti 2 r ,15' 5/ 3.0—T-- 2a SITE iO4 -0�8.,.c. I ,� X2,4°' - 409 ��\I-.3 ,- _ - .•,r .. 1-1 1 ll ` 565/ViD (' ,, 1.:1•`.,...ry ;' 1 . • t i iIV --,t- ', fr• ,'1' s'. 1: I \ , AD 72 6/82 0 ',05 ` — 1 � 1 614/77.0 ;••---;••--- '� i: - • • • • • • FIG. NO. 8 . . WATER DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM • CITY OF . • • E • . Page 19/EAGAN ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES AUGUST 24 , 1993 TOWN CENTRE 100 13TH AI>DITION — EAGAN HEIGHTS COMMERCIAL PARK Chairman Voracek opened the next public hearing of the evening regarding a Preliminary Plat consisting of one lot and two Outlots for future development located along the west side of O'Leary Lane north of Town Centre Drive in the NE 1/4 of Section 15. City Planner Sturm related the background of this application to the Commission. Michael Colon, a representative of the developer, stated the developer' s opposition to condition #4 under which the final plat must dedicate a 20 foot drainage and utility easement along the north property line of Outlot A for proposed water extension to Lot 1 . Mr. Colon indicated that such a condition is unnecessary because an easement already exists on the Valvoline property. City Attorney Dougherty stated that the developer should submit verification of such easement to the City and such required verification should bc -.:ome a condition of plat approval . Member Miller sugnested that condition #5 be revised to require the developer to provide proposed site plans . Merkley moved , Miller seconded, the motion to approve a Preliminary Plat consisting of one lot and two Outlets for future development located along the west side of O'Leary Lane north of Town Centre Drive in the NE 1/4 of Section 15, subject to the following conditions: 1 . These standard conditions of plat approval as adopted by Council action on February 2 , 1993 shall be complied with: Al , B1 , B3 , Cl , C2 , D1, El , Fl, G1 and H1 2 . Development of Lot 1, Block 1, Town Centre 100 Thirteenth Addition will require site plan review by City staff and the Advisory Planning Commission and the City Council prior to issuance of a building permit. 3 . The Final Plat shall dedicate a 30' drainage and utility easement along the west property line of Outlot B for the deep 12" sanitary sewer line. ar4 Page 20/EAGAN ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES AUGUST 24 , 1993 4 . The Final Plat shall dedicate a 20' drainage and utility easement along the north property line of Outlot A for the proposed water service extension to Lot 1 or provide proof of a utility easement to the City's satisfaction prior to final approval approval . 5. Detailed grading, drainage and erosion control plans, utility layout plans, and site plans shall be submitted for further review by City staff, Advisory Planning Commission, and City Council before any building expansion can occur on this site. 6 . Provide proof of access to Lot 1 to the City Attorney's office prior to final plat approval. 7 . Provide concept plan of the Town Centre area for review before any additional construction occurs. All present voted in favor. Si raw. MEMO city of eagan DATE: SEPTEMBER 10, 1993 TO: TOM HEDGES, CITY ADMINISTRATOR FROM: KEN VRAA, DIRECTOR OF PARKS AND RECREATION SUBJECT: TOWN CENTRE 100 13TH ADDITION The Advisory Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission reviewed the above referenced proposal at their September 9, 1993 meeting and make the following recommendations to the City Council relative to Town Centre 100 13th Addition. 1 . Parks dedication has been fulfilled with the P.U.D., therefore no parks dedication is required. 2. No trails dedication is required with this plat, however, Outlet B, which abuts Town Centre Drive will be required to install a trail at the time of development. 3. The development will be subject to a water quality cash dedication based on the area of Lot 1, Block 1 only. 4. There are no wetland issues associated with this parcel. 5. This development will not be required to submit a Tree Preservation Plan. KV:cm cc: Marilyn Wucherpfennig, Planning Aide Ed Kirscht, Engineering Technician Joe Merchak, Construction Analyst aL04