More
Help
About
Sign Out
No preview available
/
Fit window
Fit width
Fit height
400%
200%
100%
75%
50%
25%
View plain text
This document contains no pages.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
05/04/1993 - City Council Regular
AGENDA REGULAR MEETING EAGAN CITY COUNCIL EAGAN, MINNESOTA MUNICIPAL CENTER BUILDING MAY 4, 1993 6:30 P.M. I. 6:30 - ROLL CALL & PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE (BLUE) II. 6:35 - ADOPT AGENDA & APPROVAL OF MINUTES (BLUE) III. 6:45 - DEPARTMENT HEAD BUSINESS (BLUE) IV. 6:55 - CONSENT AGENDA (PINK) f42 A. PERSONNEL ITEMS 1 Aimed. B. LICENSES, Tree Contractors C. CONTRACT 93-07, Receive Bids/Award Contract (Menzel Addition - Streets & Utilities) P� 9 D . PROJECT 651, Receive Petition/Authorize Feasibility Report (Cedar Grove 6th Addition - Streetlights) P3o E. CONTRACT 91-11, Final Payment (Well 16 - Well House & Pumping Facilities) . 2( F. SET Date/Time, Second City Council Meeting in May y YC. AGREEMENT, Special Assessments Reallocation ',erg H. STATEMENT of Qualifications (SOQ) , Consulting Engineering Firms ▪ REQUEST for Proposals (RFP) , Construction Manager J. LICENSE, On-Sale Liquor, Manager of Chili' s, 3625 Pilot Knob Road ▪ LICENSE, Beer & Wine, Village House II (Que Viet) 1272 Town Centre Drive �� L. LICENSE, Gambling, Eagan Hockey Association for Pull-Tabs at Cherokee Sirloin Room .40q M. DECLARE Surplus Property for May 22, 1993, Public Auction ( P_ N. CONTRACT 88-H, Acknowledge Completion (Town Centre 100 - 5th Addition, Waterford Apartments Phase I - Utilities) 19,(40. CONTRACT 90-Y, Acknowledge Completion (Town Centre 100 - 8th Addition, Waterford Apartments Phase II - Utilities) 09.1P. AMENDMENT to 1993 Fee Schedule, Permit Fee for Motorized Golf Cart 1 e0 Q. VACATE Utility Easements, Receive Petition/Order Public Hearing (Town Centre 70 - Second & Eleventh Additions) 1(R. PROJECT 653, Receive Petition/Authorize Feasibility Report (Cedar Grove 4th Addition - Streetlights) Oo S. PROJECT 652, Receive Petition/Authorize Feasibility Report (Cedar Grove 3rd Addition - Streetlights) en T. PROJECT 654, Receive Petition/Authorize Feasibility Report (Cedar Grove 5th Addition - `` Streetlights) Ip4111117. FINAL PLAT, Bur Oak Hills 3rd Addition ' 'IS.V. FINAL PLAT, Engstroms Deerwood 2nd Addition P V. 7:00 - PUBLIC HEARINGS (SALMON) PL1 A. PROJECT 601A (Amended) , Lexington & Lone Oak (Intersection/Signalization Improvements) VI. OLD BUSINESS (ORCHID) VII. NEW BUSINESS (TAN) ( A. CONSIDER a Recommendation by the Airport Relations Commission to Support House File Q` 1 431 and Senate File 508 Concerning Metropolitan Airports Commission Representation NEW BUSINESS (continued) ft /331. AMENDMENT, Ordinance, City Code Chapter 10, Regulations for Impoundment of Barking Q Dogs & Rabies Control or/ C. AMENDMENT, Ordinance, City Code Chapter 10, Fire Lane Signage Requirements r /D. SPECIAL USE PERMIT, Target Store, to Allow Temporary Outdoor Bedding Plant Sales at U7 / 2000 Cliff Lake Road (Lot 3, Block 1, Cliff Lake Centre) /rt. SPECIAL USE PERMIT, Marvin Smith & Son, Inc. , to Allow Temporary Outdoor Sales at 3380 Highway 149 South (Lot 2, Block 1, Gopher Eagan Industrial Park Second Addition) Ij?F. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT, Aagard Environmental Services, to Allow Outdoor Storage on Lot 11 to' 8, Block 1, Sibley Terminal Industrial Park Located along the West Side of Terminal AA Drive in the SE 1/4 of Sec 8 14 75G. COMPREHENSIVE GUIDE PLAN AMENDMENT, Total Petroleum, from RB (Roadside Business) to CSC (Community Shopping Center) , a REZONING of Approximately 2.1 Acres from RB to CSC, and a CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT to Allow Outdoor Storage Located Along the South Side of Cliff Road East of Rahncliff Road in the NW 1/4 of Sec 32 jO i. LICENSE, Off-Sale Beer, Total Petroleum, 2000 Rahncliff V c) I. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT, John J. Young, to Allow an Advertising Sign on Parcel 013-56 P• Located Along the East Side of Highway 13 North of Diffley Road in the West 1/2 of Sec 19 VIII. ADDITIONAL ITEMS (GOLD) IX. LEGISLATIVE/INTERGOVERNMENTAL AFFAIRS UPDATE (GREY) X. ADMINISTRATIVE AGENDA (GREEN) XI. VISITORS TO BE HEARD (for those persons not on agenda) XII. ADJOURNMENT The City of Eagan is committed to the policy that all persons have equal access to its programs, services, activities, facilities and employment without regard to race, color, creed, religion, national origin, sex, disability, age, marital status or status with regard to public assistance. Auxiliary aids for persons with disabilities will be provided upon advance notice of at least 96 hours. If a notice of less than 96 hours is received, the City of Eagan will attempt to provide such aid. MEMO TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCILMEMBERS FROM: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES DATE: APRIL 29, 1993 SUBJECT: AGENDA INFORMATION FOR THE MAY 4, 1993 CITY COUNCIL MEETING COPT AGENPANTROVE.MMTES After approval is given to the May 4, 1993 City Council agenda, regular meeting minutes for the April 20, 1993 City Council meeting and special meeting minutes for the March 30 and April 5 special City Council meetings, the following items are in order for consideration. DEPARTMENT'HE BUSINESS: At this time there are no items to be considered under department head business. Agenda Information Memo May 4, 1993 City Council Meeting CONSENT AGENDA ............................................................... There are twenty-two (22) items on the agenda referred to as consent items requiring one (1) motion by the City Council. If the City Council wishes to discuss any of the items in further detail, those items should be removed from the Consent Agenda and placed under Additional Items unless the discussion required is brief. PERSONNEL ITEMS A. PERSONNEL ITEMS: Item 1. Seasonal Park Maintenance Workers--Due to the resignation of a number of seasonal park maintenance workers, it was necessary for City Administrator Hedges to approve the hiring of five seasonal park maintenance workers as recommended by Superintendent of Parks VonDeLinde. Those persons are Randy Bryant, Kenneth Cooley, Gary Hedman, Wayne Johnson and Rolf Simonson. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To ratify the hiring of Randy Bryant, Kenneth Cooley, Gary Hedman, Wayne Johnson and Rolf Simonson as seasonal parks maintenance workers. Item 2. Seasonal Street Maintenance Worker--In order to have a seasonal street maintenance worker start work on April 26, 1993, City Administrator Hedges approved the hiring of Dan Hekrdle as recommended by Superintendent of Streets Erhart. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To ratify the hiring of Dan Hekrdle as a seasonal street maintenance worker. Item 3. Personnel Policy Revisions--Department heads have reviewed and are recommending two revisions to the current personnel policy. The first revision would be to section 8, outside employment. As currently stated in the personnel policy, employees must notify their supervisor in writing and receive written approval from their supervisor for plans to engage in outside work. Staff has received a petition from a number of employees objecting to needing to receive permission from a supervisor for each and every outside work undertaking. After thoroughly discussing the request from the employees, staff determined that written notification from the employee for all outside work undertakings was necessary in order to protect the employee, the supervisor and the City. However, permission was not necessary in most cases. Therefore, the personnel policy has been revised so that the supervisor would only notify the employee if the planned outside work 4 w uld violate conditions as outlined in the outside employment section. Enclosed on page is a copy of the proposed revision. t2..., ill Agenda Information Memo May 4, 1993 City Council Meeting The second revision would be to section 10, working hours and overtime pay. Before the City was required to follow provisions of the Fair Labor Standards Act, employees who worked overtime had a choice of either overtime pay or compensatory time off. When the Fair Labor Standards Act came into effect, compensatory time was not allowed by that law. Therefore, the City discontinued the use of compensatory time. However, compensatory time is now legal according to that law for public employees. In a number of bargaining contracts, the City has allowed employees to choose between compensatory time or overtime cash payment. It is the recommendation of the department heads that this choice also be extended to non-collective bargaining employees at the City. Therefore, there is a proposed revision to the personnel poli ection regarding overtime pay. A copy of that proposed change is enclosed on page for the Council's information. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve revisions to section 8 (outside employment) regarding notification to and from the supervisor of outside work and to section 10 (working hours and overtime pay) extending a choice of either cash payment or compensatory time for overtime work for non-collective bargaining employees. 3 SECTION EIGHT OUTSIDE EMPLOYMENT 8 . 1 Generally: The City Council does not encourage outside work by the City employees. The impact of any outside work will be evaluated as it relates to job performance. Each department shall be responsible for the regulation of outside work by its employees in accordance with the provisions of this policy. 8 . 2 Employees may not engage in any outside occupation, employment or business which might hinder their impartial or objective performance of their public duties, be incompatible with their City employment, impair their efficiency on the job, or create the appearance of or an actual or potential conflict of interest between City duties and the outside duties or interests that they are permitted to undertake through this section. 8 . 3 Employees shall notify their supervisor in writing and receive written approval from thcir department supervisor of their plans to engage in outside work, excluding work cngagcd in while on approved leave time. If the supervisor believes the planned outside work would violate conditions as outlined in this section, the supervisor will so notify the employee in writing within ten working days of receipt of the notice from the employee. Outside work shall be regarded as secondary to regular City employment and shall not interfere with the availability of employees for emergency or call in duty. The City's worker' s compensation insurance does not cover any individual injured in the course of outside employment. 8 . 4 No employee shall, while on duty, accept pay or compensation from anyone for work rendered. The employee may engage in outside employment during vacation and holiday leave as long as all rules of this policy are complied with. 8 . 5 Employees are prohibited from working for any contractor or company that has a contract with the City during the period of construction work for the City. 12 May 1993 SECTION TEN WORKING HOURS AND OVERTIME PAY 10. 1 For all non-exempt employees as defined by the Fair Labor Standards Act, forty hours shall constitute a normal working week and all hours worked in excess of 40 hours per week shall be referred to as "overtime. " A work week shall begin on Sunday at 12 : 01 a.m. and end on Saturday at 12 : 00 midnight. 10. 2 The work year of 2080 hours per year represents an average work year and shall be used to calculate benefits and wage rates only. It in no way alters, affects or expands the overtime provisions or periods defined above. All daily, weekly, and monthly work schedules or shifts will be determined by the department head and City Administrator. 10 . 3 All time worked over 40 hours per week by non- exempt employees shall be compensated for in a cash payment which will be calculated at the rate of one and one-half (1-1/2) times the employee ' s regular rate of pay. Regular employees may elect to receive compensatory time off at the overtime rate (time and one half) instead of cash. An advance three day notice is required for reouest for use of this time. A maximum of 40 hours of compensatory time can be earned and used during a calendar year. Any compensatory time remaining in the bank as of the last payroll ending date of any year would be paid in cash. 10. 4 Approved leave time shall be added in computing 40 hours for overtime purposes. 10. 5 Breaks 10. 5. 1 For all full-time, non-exempt employees, coffee breaks or rest periods shall consist of a total of one-half hour of non-compensable time for lunch break and a total of two fifteen-minute rest/break periods. The break periods may be taken as one fifteen-minute rest period per day and one forty-five (45) minute lunch break, as two fifteen minute rest periods and one thirty-minute lunch break per day or as two seven and a half minute rest periods and one forty-five (45) minute lunch break. Such times are to be 14 May 1993 Agenda Information Memo May 4, 1993 City Council Meeting TREE MAINTENANCE CONTRACTOR LICENSES B. Licenses, Tree Contractors--The City has received applications for tree maintenance contractors' licenses from the following businesses: Huston's Tree Service 13401 Morgan Avenue South Burnsville Roggen Buck Tree Care 3967 Westbury Way Eagan Outdoor Specialties 1535 Cliff Road Eagan The appropriate documentation has been provided and staff finds no reason to deny these licenses. Copies of the license applications are enclosed without page number for the Council's information. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve tree maintenance contractors' licenses for Huston's Tree Service, Roggen Buck Tree Care and Outdoor Specialties. Agenda Information Memo May 4, 1993 City Council Meeting RECEIVE BIDS/AWARD CONTRACT (WENZEL ADDITION) C. Contract 93-07,Receive Bids/Award Contract (Wenzel Addition-Streets &Utilities)-- At 10:30 a.m. on Friday, April 30th, formal bids were received for the installation of streets and utilities to service f e proposed Wenzel Addition under the above referenced addition. Enclosed on page is a tabulation of the bids received with a comparison of the low bid to the estimate contained in the feasibility report presented at the public hearing held on March 16, 1993. All bids will be reviewed for accuracy and compliance with bid specification requirements and any discrepancies will be specifically addressed at the May 4th Council meeting. All easements necessary for the installation of this public improvement have been dedicated with the final plat approved by Council action on April 20, 1993. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To receive the bids for Contract 93-07 (Wenzel Addition-Streets & Utilities) and award the contract to the lowest responsible bidder and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute all related documents. ri WENZEL ADDITION PROJECT 641 CONTRACT 93-07 EAGAN, MINNESOTA BID DATE: April 30, 1993 BID TIME: 10:30 A.M. D.S.T. CONTRACTORS TOTAL BASE BID 1. Richard Knutson $ 546,903.45 2. Northdale Construction 558,032.85 3. Ryan Contracting 584,232.42 4. Barbarossa & Sons 588,664.42 5. S.M. Hentges & Sons 597,719.00 6. Nodland Construction 611,216.92 7. Arcon Construction 615,557.80 8. S.R. Weidema 625,272.82 LOW BID $ 546,903.45 Feasibility Report Estimate $ 648,380.00 % Over (+) Under (-) - 15.65% Engineer's Estimate $ 580,000.00 % Over (+) Under (-) - 5.7% 2 Agenda Information Memo May 4, 1993 City Council Meeting RECEIVE PETITION CEDAR GROVE 6TH ADDN. - STREETLIGHTS D. Project 651, Receive Petition/Authorize Feasibility Report (Cedar Grove 6th Addition-Streetlights)--Enclosed on pages (d through 'Cj is a copy of a Petition and a location map the staff received from 73 citizens representing 141 properties requesting the installation of streetlights within the Cedar Grove 6th Addition. These properties constitute 52% of the project area. This Petition is being presented to the City Council for their consideration of authorizing the preparation of a feasibility report to estimate the project cost, benefitted area and preliminary assessment roll. Upon completion of this report, it will be presented to the City Council for their consideration of scheduling a public hearing to formally present this information to all affected property owners. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To receive the Petition and authorize the preparation of the feasibility report for Project 651 (Cedar Grove 6th Addition- Streetlights) and schedule a public hearing for June 1. VEO ‘3\) RECE +EOTA �3 Petition # 1p � ` Date Received Presented to Council 4.--v- f3 PETITION LOCATION/SUBDIVISION C 6b4J 6 , o v E No, G I/We, the undersigned, owners of the real property adjacent to (Street) or within Dp te 6 /e0 U/+ No , G Subdivision, hereby petition for: Street Improvements Sanitary Sewer Water Supply (Check requested items) Storm Sewer Streetlights Other (Explain) I/'ae understand that this petition does not in itself request the installation of these improvements, but rather, request the preparation of a feasibility report in which the estimated costs of these improvements will be tabulated. I/We understand that upon receipt of this petition and the preparation of the requested feasibility report, a public hearing will be held at which time we may voice our support or opposition based on the costs as prepared in said feasibility report. Signature of Land Owner Address of Prorerty•2 . - '• + �r� /7 �5 5� . �, 3. 5 G � I ? �7 3 1 Th 4. 17 ?) C 5. / Ad i t . • ( 7 c2 477 1 Ind /1 Air 17 5 ,(4 ) , ae,;,1,1,_ 1 ? 76 Dt, to A 2 AQR Q �� FOR CITY USE ONLY `\' Petition # Date Received Presented to Council PETITION LOCATION/SUBDIVISION C FOAR 6 KC UE HO, C. I/We, the undersigned, owners of the real property adjacent to 1 (Street) or within C rDpF 6 Po v/.,.. No, w Subdivision, hereby petition for: Street Improvements Sanitary Sewer Water Supply (Check requested items) Storm Sewer Streetlights Other (Explain) I/We understand that this petition does not in itself request the installation of these improvements, but rather, request the preparation of a feasibility report in which the estimated costs of these improvements will be tabulated. I/We understand that upon receipt of this petition and the preparation of the requested feasibility report, a public hearing will be held at which time we may voice our support or opposition based on the costs as prepared in said feasibility report. Sienatare of Land Owner Addr- • • • •e t IWO .krign _ 2. _,L;� _ ' 'I nom.,,,-v-�--z-- 6 Z - .s I - �� - 5572 Z 3•` 47 J?. _/ , ile , sip ly (�1 ti. 4. „ ' < cam_ /71., • - --4- / 7.. . ..._ --I._ 3`/. 5. 161111= J . • •_, . .L.. _: .•L • 1' A S/2' -- •,•- 1 , ' t' �1 ,� M t�$7 6. 7, w • _ . .....'� / 7 ?7 _ /c), iiimme,!o ` 4, 1 ° / ' . AI's/ 5'r"2 2 PQ�� FOR CITY USE ONLY `�'� Petition # �` Date Received Presented to Council PETITION LOCATION/SUBDIVISION e Ei J G K e U E j./o, I/We, the undersigned, owners of the real property adjacent to (Street) or within C �Df►K G go v/r, N0 , 6 Subdivision, hereby petition for: Street Improvements Sanitary Sewer Water Supply (Check requested items) Storm Sewer Streetlights Other (Explain) I/We understand that this petition does not in itself request the installation of these improvements, but rather, request the preparation of a feasibility report in which the estimated costs of these improvements will be tabulated. I/We understand that upon receipt of this petition and the preparation of the requested feasibility report, a public hearing will be held at which time we may voice our support or opposition based on the costs as prepared in said feasibility report. $ignatu e of Land Owner Address of Prouestx 1. / `3 5110lKI'l;/G CO C L t, 2 — ;gze 3. 4• 1 ; `- it/r7 77,,,&.,3 E(Sci 41,52y2kAt. 0. S. / '� D,rra.Gta-L 1770 144/2.444, i Q/L- 7, 6 c21A)'5. 1 $1FLTmot ,o '.1 011SIMA `I �erpcNT 1—fir Aria ! ��' FOR CITY USE ONLY i-Q`Q Petition # !`ivy Date Received 054T1 le.. Presented to Council PETITION LOCATION/SUBDIVISION C 61 g 6 Ke UE Ho. G I/We, the undersigned, owners of the real property adjacent to • (Street) or within G t f 4 G f 0 U6 N0 , 6 Subdivision, hereby petition for: Street Improvements Sanitary Sewer Water Supply (Check requested items) Storm Sewer Streetlights Other (Explain) I/We understand that this petition does not in itself request the installation of these improvements , but rather, request the preparation of a feasibility report in which the estimated costs of these improvements will be tabulated. I/We understand that upon receipt of this petition and the preparation of the requested feasibility report, a public hearing will be held at which time we may voice our support or opposition based on the costs as prepared in said feasibility report. Signature of -nd Owner Address of Property 1 ' z. /..i..), ;, /A ' ��/94), t i ( � - 1 to *01) /Ai7 ' 3. ht�.-a/7 /'78-3 4 ZnL e✓ / 7L-7.J 7 ' - .si4ti-cam 5. /47/...Uf Ze s 39 /l T RaLeis` !''T- 6. rk,ti ,2 rr�c.. r cz 3S0 l wry, ,4c P-L. . 7, ?t N L c_q ry f)14 3 ' 'IJ i,A.sr�: t pT }a g C�- L, . w 1,,, .- 61 774, p-i, i C, • i _(.0/i44.1-;( '')Lf."". w- \' • le ! /V FOR CITY USE ONLY y�` Petition # - Date Received Presented to Council PETITION LOCATION/SUBDIVISION CEUAK G ,C r v E Flo, C. 1/We, the undersigned, owners of the real property adjacent to (Street) or within G n/t+K 6 ,0 Ur No , G Subdivision, hereby petition for: Street Improvements Sanitary Sewer Water Supply (Check requested items) Storm Sewer Streetlights Other (Explain) I/We understand that this petition does not in itself request the installation of these improvements , but rather, request the preparation of a feasibility report in which the estimated costs of these improvements will be tabulated. I/We understand that upon receipt of this petition and the preparation of the requested feasibility report, a public hearing will be held at which time we may voice our support or opposition based on the costs as prepared in said feasibility report. Signature of Land Owner Address of Property J 2 ,, % 1.,./ .�.Lcxv,,., 14 </1ettA / ) S --r4.44,7_,,..",-(.44, v 2. ��:- ,,,,:./? /2 7 3 /.� <- 3. , ! Cr ,/ $ 3922 U II_c.,?,u 105 C1edLE 4. 7(!L,--�S<�'57 /7:7 ;Lr t rr,,,..-- . —"It_____,..ZZ--,-i '...... -o_..r 1 6. r1.1W Q ! -1 l�(c !iC( i of J TT, 7 I-77S 'Ta2QuotSE7cA(L , g n .A,. i bi,r C F. \-11 J'c t, 5 r U \ 1, , i .. . .� � . r - - ea � r cev% J i 14 . FOR CITY USE ONLY Petition • Date Received Presented to Council PETITION LOCATION/SUBDIVISION C Etf i G Jac vE HD, C I/We, the undersigned, owners of the real property adjacent to (Street) or within G Dpi 6 Pour Na, 6 Subdivision, hereby petition for: Street Improvements Sanitary Sewer Water Supply (Check requested items) Storm Sewer Streetlights Other (Explain) 1/ge understand that this petition does not in itself request the installation of these improvements, but rather, request the preparation of a feasibility report in which the estimated costs of these improvements will be tabulated. I/we understand that upon receipt of this petition and the preparation of the requested feasibility report, a public hearing will be held at which time we may voice our support or opposition based on the costs as prepared in said feasibility report. $itnature of Land Owner Address of Property I. 4'4- 3%3 /9e/ of,,-e- 2 fad / - 3. , ,i/ • tom, _ =/ �,� 3 5 5 I /I • 4• /t4 5. f� V jj'ZIAIL ( � G 7 6, Ghn 6. 43)J I 1 40 7 CG'g bb re 1ra , / i 7 /� y / 2 G C �0114_,-e4 e d Ci i� ' ` �- /7'V (f".,‘k-0 9 '4 '1 ftly 1 47� 63 �' •f-c ; / 1 � - 'a "*- ( S // /t 6. - l / t, :; • PO USE ONLY L r, Petition # K , IYt 0 AP it 3 0 1993 Date Received Presented to Council S-4 -11 PETITION LOCATION/SUBDIVISION C E DA 72 G R cd C MO . & I/We, the undersigned, owners of the real property adjacent to (Street) or within C E D A JZ C, RD (1 E / ). (o Subdivision, hereby petition for: Street Improvements Sanitary Sewer Water Supply (Check requested items) Storm Sewer Streetlights lerr Other (Explain) • I/We understand that this petition does not in itself request the installation of these improvements, but rather, request the preparation of a feasibility report in which the estimated costs of these improvements will be tabulated. I/We understand that upon receipt of this petition and the preparation of the requested feasibility report, a public hearing will be held at which time we may voice our support or opposition based on the costs as prepared in said feasibility report. Signature of Land Owner Address of ProvesIy 2. / _ d .�.. _. VM, ( • • _ E _ 4. m/ / -i Ama4mAlf FF 4 F 7 i >~lat 5 27 d'r /Ada 6. , 35 /6 0j, :l+ ;„F Er(le, ,11 41t,..1- 111- iffilM1111.4 ;4147.i 1 Ft MO Inv CI 0(J 7Y q l/� • FOR CITY USE ONLY r Petition #-ELECELVE0-42944) 1193 Date Received Presented to Council 1-•4-Q3 Q PETITION LOCATION/SUBDIVISION C E D A g G R o ci E Ho. 6 I/We, the undersigned, owners of the real property adjacent to • (Street) or within C E DA R G Ro V E Na , et, Subdivision, hereby petition for: Street Improvements • Sanitary Sewer Water Supply (Check requested items) Storm Sewer Streetlights Other (Explain) I/We understand that this petition does not in itself request the installation of these improvements , but rather, request the preparation of a feasibility report in which the estimated costs of these improvements will be tabulated. I/We understand that upon receipt of this petition and the preparation of the requested feasibility report, a public hearing will be held at which time we may voice our support or opposition based on the costs as prepared in said feasibility report. Signature of Land Owner Address of Properly 1 Q(7-4-1\sc)r\ -\ /F5G -Fp\ cc9ctr\ • 2 i/ 3. V.0.--0"1; /7i 7Z1R(2 LAW i`t 77? tc 4L— 4. d n'1 -7S0 " t.-(COrt 5. 6. • /c — _ -0 (I) C .* coo CO aP 1 L. M i l 11 I — ; ' I 1 i o iii ii.. iii a 0. _ItL / 1 ... Jo g CO •..° - cm3i, _. ■ . i. -: 311,- :_-*"-_-1 _i-*-- '7 r Y M O 7 1.__ .0 _ . - — r a 1 _. !0 S7 _ T c. O Q t R .— _ Z O 1 _ �� — �� - _ W O I N.‘,._1-' � I --a f�' x%� ,���. 1 , l j ° a I Ln ,,,c,. . ,..,...."..\-‘ \....,.....,-,..,",". CCCCCC r ' F- % "�,;� � , , , w �; � . 3nd a ,' ��� - r-1 r____ m m cr a O »- a 3 0 0 ,��_� ±' ;TI Td V ' 0492[ \.(::\ Agenda Information Memo May 4, 1993 City Council Meeting FINAL PAYMENT WELL #16 E. Contract 91-11, Final Payment/Acceptance (Well #16 - Well House & Pumping Facilities)--The staff has received a request for final payment for the above-referenced contract along with a certification from the consulting engineering firm of satisfactory compliance with City approved plans and specifications. Final inspections have been performed by representatives of the Public Works Utility Division and found to be in order for favorable Council action. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the 6th and Final payment for Contract 91-11 (Well #16-Wellhouse and Pumping Facilities) in the amount of S13,365.33 to Richmar Construction, Inc. and authorize acceptance for perpetual maintenance subject to all appropriate warranty provisions. a6 Agenda Information Memo May 4, 1993 City Council Meeting SET DATE & TIME/SECOND MAY COUNCIL MEETING F. Set Date/Time, Second City Council Meeting in May--Due to the fact that School Board elections are being held on the second Tuesday in May which is May 18, and also due to the fact that Councilmembers and staff members have conflicts on other days in that week, it is the consensus of Council and staff that the meeting be held on Tuesday, May 18, as would be normal procedure. However, because of the School Board election, the meeting should begin at 8:00 p.m. rather than 6:30 p.m. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To set the date and time for the second City Council meeting in May for May 18 at 8:00 p.m. t Agenda Information Memo May 4, 1993 City Council Meeting AGREEMENT/SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS REALLOCATION G. Agreement, Special Assessments Reallocation--At the April 20, 1993 City Council meeting, an application was received which would have reallocated $168,147 of pending assessments from Outlot D of Lexington Pointe Addition to Outlot A of Lexington Pointe Eighth Addition. Enclosed on pages ea3 through .,(,, is a copy of that reallocation request. Concern was expressed that that might create an unreasonable burden on Outlot A and staff was directed to initiate a request for a different reallocation. That has been completed and enclosed on page is a copy of the modified request. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the agreement authorizing reallocation of special assessments and waiver of hearing and right of appeal with the modification. AGREEMENT AUTHORIZING REALLOCATION OF SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS AND WAIVER OF HEARING AND RIGHT OF APPEAL THIS AGREEMENT is entered into this ,3r(_',) day of November, 1992 . WHEREAS, C. David Schenkel is the owner of Outlot D, Lexington Pointe Addition located within the City of Eagan, County of Dakota , State of Minnesota ; and WHEREAS, C. David Schenkel as owner and Robert Engstrom Companies, a Minnesota corporation, as developer have requested and received approval by the City Council of the City of Eagan for rezoning and subdivision of Outlot D, Lexington Pointe Addition; and WHEREAS, Outlot D, Lexington PointE? Addition is to be platted into Outlots A, B, C and Lots 1 through 14 , Block 1 , Lots 1 through 14 , Block 2 , Lots 1 through 14 , Block 3 and Lots 1 through 15 , Block 4 , Lexington Pointe Eighth Addition; and WHEREAS, on the date hereof prior to the final plat approval by the Eagan City Council for Lexington Pointe Eighth Addition, there is a pending assessment against Outlot D, Lexington Pointe Addition for the upgrading and improvement of Diffley Road (Public Improvement Project No. 607) which abuts the northern border of Outlot D, Lexington Pointe Addition; and WHEREAS, as a condition of the plat approval for Lexington Pointe Eighth Addition and upon request by the owner and developer, the parties agree to allocate the total pending assessment for Public Improvement Project No. 607 (Diffley Road upgrade) against Outlot A, Lexington Pointe Eighth Addition; and WHEREAS, C. David Schenkel and Robert Engstrom Companies acknowledge the benefits accruing to them as a result of the approval of the plat of Lexington Pointe Eighth Addition. NOW THEREFORE, based on the foregoing facts, the parties agree as follows : 1 . The pending assessment against Outlot D, Lexington Pointe Addition for Public Improvement Project No. 607 (Diffley Road upgrade) shall upon the filing of the plat of Lexington Pointe Eighth Addition be allocated and subsequently levied solely against Outlot A, Lexington Pointe Eighth Addition. 2 . The present pending assessment for Project 607 (Diffley Road upgrade) is preliminarily calculated in the amount of $168 , 147 . 00, tabulated as follows: 1 , 570 front feet x $107 . 10 commercial rate of assessment. This amount represents the maximum assessment which will be due and payable against Outlot A, Lexington Pointe Eighth Addition for Project 607 , and at the time of levy shall be spread over a fifteen ( 15) year period of repayment together with interest as determined at the tame of levy using a basis the interest paid by the City for the general obligation bonds . Any reduction in the commercial rate of $107 . 10 shall accrue to the owner of Outlot A, Lexington Pointe Eighth Addition. 3 . The undersigned for their heirs, successors and assigns , waive their right to object and appeal the adoption of the assessment for Project 607 (Diffley Road upgrade) as set forth in Minn. Stat. §429 . 081 . 4 . C. David Schenkel and Robert Engstrom Companies acknowledge that they voluntarily and knowingly entered into this Agreement . a � IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have set forth their signatures on the date set forth below. j ).?, _ ()l / i C. David Schenkel ROBERT ENGSTROM COMPANIES, a Minnesota corporation By: Robert E Engstrom Its: Pr sident STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ss. COUNTY OF l4k e T17 ) // On this 3 ,, day of /Z/v v e,0, .5-w , 1992 , before me a Notary Public within and for said County, personally appeared C. DAVID SCHENKEL, to me personally known to be the person described in and who executed the foregoing instrument and acknowledged that he executed the same as his free act and deed. ... ....CD'°"'.' r[.rnt 1 N.tary Public V STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ss. COUNTY OF Pii/zvJ?1 ) / On this a -7 day of /1 0 y�-(----_-_, 1992 , before me a Notary Public within and for said County, personally appeared ROBERT E. ENGSTROM to me personally known, who being by me duly sworn, did say that he is the President of Robert Engstrom Companies, the corporation named in the foregoing instrument, that said instrument was signed on behalf of said corporation by authority of its Board of Directors and said President acknowledged said instrument to be the free act and deed of the corporation. kio��MICfIAFL G CA;l.'GI{L(I r ����■ M "RrPUCiC "'"u"i:,'" No :ry Public L......... MNOIA :June littlY tbmm+ss° Erp�res June It 1996 .».......... .. f ( 65 APPROVED AS TO FORM: 4 City Attori�J g -' Dat- • APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: Fi t)344S&PtL e Department Date: %( • "s* in THIS INSTRUMENT WAS DRAFTED BY: SEVERSON, WILCOX & SHELDON, P.A. 600 Midway National Bank Building 7300 West 147th Street Apple Valley, MN 55124 (612) 432-3136 MGD/wkt a4 APR 33 '93 12 27 ROBERT ENGSTROM CO'S P.2 • city OF acigcin THOMAS EGAN Mom PATRCIA AWADA SHAWN HUNTER April 23, 1993 SANDRA A.MASIN THEODORE WACHTER Cowen M6mber6 ROBERT ENGSTROM ROBERT ENGSTROM ASSOC INC THOMAS HEDGES CIN Atlm'rri5fialor 4801 W 81ST ST MINNEAPOLIS MN 55437 Si,. VAN OVERBEKE City Clerk Re: Agreement,Ruthorisi1�g Reallocation of Spew �issessmenttig and Waiver of 'HWaring and Right at AppoW - . . Dear Mr. Engstrom: Per our telephone conversation of Wednesday, April 21, 1993, I am proposing that the above-referenced agreement be modified as follows: The pending assessment against Outlot D, Lexington Pointe Addition for Public Improvement Project No. 607 (Diffley Road Upgrade) in the amount of $168, 147 be allocated and subsequently levied against Lexington Pointe Eighth Addition as follows: Outlot A $ 92,148 Outlot B 60,052 Outlot C 15,947 Total IlaW12 This changes the original reallocation of the total amount against Outlot A and is within the City Council's parameters for acceptance. If this is acceptable, please sign and return one copy of this letter to me. I will return the modified agreement to the City Council as a consent item for their approval per their direction. I apologize for any confusion created by this process. Thank you for your assistance. Sincerely, Eik.)Mft—C4440.11A14— E. J. VanOverbeke I concur ith the proposed modification to the agreement. A' ' qt;;3-■-, 4/4e As Robert E. Engstrom Date MUNICIPAL CENTER MAINTENANCE FACIIWV THE LONE OAK TREE 3501 COACHMAN POINT 20.60 Ptlor KNOB THE SYMBOL OF STRENGTH AND GROWTH IN OUR COMMUNITY EAGAN.MINNESOTA TA 551221897 EAGAN,MINNESOTA 55122 PHONE:(612)6BI-4600 PHONE:(612)661.000 FAX:(612)681-4612 Equal Opportuntry/A1fIrrnotNe Action Employer FAX (612)681.4360 MD.(614)15l-8535 MO'D'(612)46 -6556 MD. p=o6° 612 89? 1841 04-30-93 12 : 28FM F002 #47 Agenda Information Memo May 4, 1993, City Council Meeting STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS CONSULTING ENGINEERING FIRMS H. Statement of Qualifications (SOQ), Consulting Engineering Firms--In 1987, the City Council determined that it would be in the City's best interest to publicly solicit interest from multiple consulting engineering firms to allow the City to select a pool of firms to work with for a minimum of 3 years and a maximum of 5 years. Various firms were selected in 1988 and were subsequently retained and used for the following 5 years. Recently, the City Council directed City staff to proceed with a similar process to again resolicit interest from existing and potential firms for the next 3-5 year time frame. In accordance with the City's policy on the selection and retention of professional consulting services, the solicitation will be through the Statement of Qualifications (SOQ) process in lieu of a specific Request For Proposal (RFP) process. The SOQ process allows the City to evaluate the qualifications of various firms to be retained for projects yet to be determined. The RFP process is used for specific projects with a defined scope of services and end product. Enclosed on pages ..2 through �(o is a memo from the Public Works Director forwarding the propose schedule and SOQ packet which is being presented to the City Council for their information and subsequent authorization to formally advertise and solicit interested firms through this process. If the Council has a desire to be directly involved in the proposal review/interview process, it would be helpful in officially designating those Council members so that schedules can be coordinated accordingly. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To authorize staff to proceed with formal request for Statement of Qualifications (SOQ) for perpetual consulting services. .,t,p.a... .I' LC-- MEMO _city of eagan TO: THOMAS L HEDGES, CITY ADMINISTRATOR FROM: THOMAS A COLBERT, DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS DATE: APRIL 23, 1993 SUBJECT: CONSULTANT ENGINEERING SERVICES SELECTION PROCESS & SCHEDULE In accordance with the City Council's directive, I have begun the process of soliciting consultant engineering firms interested in providing professional services to the City of Eagan. This process will be similar to the one performed approximately 5 years ago. The solicitation of interested firms will be in accordance with the City policy "For Engaging Professional Consulting Services" approved by Council action on March 19, 1991, which solicits interest through the request for a Statement of Qualifications (SOQ) process. Attached is a schedule that will be followed to complete this process. Also enclosed is a copy of the SOQ document that will be distributed to all interested firms. Before this is distributed, I would appreciate it if you would confirm the Public Works Committee's level of involvement and inform me if there are any other staff members who would be interested in sitting in on the interview panel with Mike Foertsch and myself. If you have any questions or concerns regarding the schedule or the packet information, please let me know as soon as possible. I intend on presenting this information to the City Council at the meeting of May 4 for concurrence and authorization to advertise and solicit responses. 1 --/A/-C-- - Director of Public Works TAC/jj cc: Mike Foertsch, Assistant City Engineer (W/Enc.) Enclosure: Schedule SOQ Document &9 SCHEDULE STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS ENGINEERING SERVICES City Council Approval of SOQ May 4, 1993 Advertise;Distribute SOQ's May 5, 1993 Pre-submittal/Proposer Conference May 20, 1993 8:30 a.m. Thursday SOQ Submittals May 27, 1993 Staff Evaluation June 1-4, 1993 Staff/Public Works Committee Interviews June 7-11, 1993 City Council Approval June 15, 1993 3i ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS REQUEST FOR STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS I CITY OF EAGAN MAY 4, 1993 �J � ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS REQUEST FOR STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION 2 II. STATEMENT INSTRUCTIONS 2 III. STATEMENT CONTENT 3 IV. CATEGORIES 4 V. STATEMENT EVALUATION AND CONTRACT AWARD 7 VI. CONSULTANT SERVICES PERFORMANCE REVIEW 9 VII. CONTRACT EXECUTION 9 VIII. CITY INFORMATION 11 I. INTRODUCTION This request for STATEMENTS OF QUALIFICATIONS has been prepared by the City of Eagan in order to retain the services of consulting firms to provide municipal engineering services for the City. The City desires to establish various categories of services to which professional consulting firms will be assigned. The City of Eagan hopes to retain up to three firms for each specific category listed within. It should be noted that firms are eligible to be retained in as many of the areas as they are qualified for. The municipal engineering services desired include all the planning, engineering, and support activities necessary to implement various public improvements. The services include: • comprehensive system/facility plans and studies • preliminary engineering feasibility reports • environmental worksheets • detailed design plans • specifications • estimates and construction contract documents • competitive bid solicitation and evaluation • construction engineering, inspection and observation services • the preparation of record plans and final contract close-out reports • miscellaneous specialty/technical services identified herein All work assignments will take into consideration the work load, expertise and performance of the firm. II. STATEMENT INSTRUCTIONS A. All responses, questions and correspondence should be directed to: Thomas A. Colbert, P.E. Public Works Director City of Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan MN 55122-1897 (612) 681-4646 All statements must be received no later than 4:30 p.m., May 27, 1993. 2 3� III. STATEMENT CONTENT A. Title Page Include the name of the firm, local address, telephone and fax number, name of the contact person, and the date. B. Table of Contents Include a clear identification of the material by section and page number. C. Consultant Profile 1. The areas of general services and/or technical expertise proposed to be provided directly by the firm. 2. The qualifications of the firm as related to the services to be provided. 3. A statement should address the basis of the firm's interest for each of the specialty categories for which the firm wishes to be considered. 4. The name, experience, and qualifications of the person(s) that will be responsible for the management and administration of a contract with the City. 5. The qualifications and resumes of the professional staff that will be assigned to various City projects. 6. The short and long-term availability of the aforementioned staff. 7. A list of municipal clients where related services were provided by staff identified in #5 and the name and telephone number of a person who may be contacted at that municipality. 8. A list of current municipal clients identifying projects in progress, the specific activities being performed, and the name of a person who may be contacted at the municipality. 9. A list of previous or current services provided to the City of Eagan. 3 3� 10. A list of private clients for whom work has been or is being performed within the City of Eagan, the type of project, the specific activities performed, and the name of a person who may be contacted at the client. 11. A current fee schedule including hourly rates, specialty rates, multipliers, percentages, etc. for the various classifications of personnel proposed to provide services under a contract with the City. Identify what services are included in these rates (i.e. mileage, etc.) 12. Specifically state the firm's preferred method of calculating fees for different types of services provided. IV. CATEGORIES OF CONSULTANTS There are three (3) primary categories of consultant services anticipated. A. General Municipal Engineering B. Technical/Specialty Services C. Retained Consultant Services A. General Municipal Engineering Summary of Services: Provide technical engineering expertise in the preparation and development of site specific and/or comprehensive system plans: prepare special studies, feasibility reports and detailed plans and specifications for specific improvement projects; provide the necessary professional and technical manpower to supervise and manage improvement contracts and provide technical assistance to the City's professional staff as required. 1. Planning • Prepare, review, update and revise comprehensive sanitary sewer, storm sewer, water main, water quality, transportation and park systems plans for the City of Eagan. • Advise staff and Council of estimated costs, alternative financing methods and recommended schedules of needed capital improvements to implement provisions of the comprehensive plans. 4 2. Construction • Prepare preliminary engineering and feasibility reports for proposed public improvement projects. • Prepare detailed plans, specifications and technical drawings necessary for the construction of public improvements. • Advertise and evaluate bids. • Conduct public hearings and assist with necessary neighborhood meetings. • Determine and provide legal descriptions and assist in the acquisition of necessary easements. • Conduct preconstruction meetings and coordinate with other utility , companies, contractors, governmental agencies, etc., to ensure the proper scheduling, permit applications and general supervision of public and private improvement contracts. • Perform construction staking and location surveying. • Perform inspection and construction observation services to ensure compliance with City standards and approved plans and specifications. • Document the type and location of public improvement installations and prepare accurate record plans reflecting all changes or modification. • Prepare contract Close-Out Reports and perform the testing and inspections necessary to recommend acceptance to staff and the City Council. • Provide overall contract/project management acting on behalf of and as an agent for the City. 3. Assessments • Assists the City staff in determining the proper and equitable assessment rates to properly finance public improvement projects. • Provide cost breakdown of all related project costs to allow City staff to prepare a detail assessment allocation. 5 3 (e 4. Miscellaneous • Review, evaluate and submit suggested revisions to existing fee schedules and assessment policies, utility user rates, public improvement financing surcharges, and general financing of public improvement projects. • Provide technical assistance and representation for the Municipal State Aid street programs. • Assist in maintaining and updating City utility and street index maps. • Provide necessary information as requested by staff in preparation of annual reports, budgets, bond obligation finance statements, etc. • Perform other related duties as requested in writing by the City Council or authorized staff. B. Technical Specialty Consultant Services These services are for consultants who are specialized in technical or limited areas of expertise for occasional specific work programs or on-going limited services relating to their area of particular expertise (soil testing, erosion inspection, etc.). 1. Architectural • park shelter buildings • utility operation structures (well houses, reservoirs, etc.) • municipal buildings (expansions, remodeling, etc.) • landscape architecture 2. Communications • radio • telemetry • alarms • SCADA 3. Electrical 'Mechanical • street lights • energy management • pump efficiency 6 31 4. Land Surveying • subdivisions/plats • certificates of survey • easement descriptions • lot corner (re)placement 5. Natural Resources • water quality studies • monitoring • hydrologic/hydraulic analysis • erosion control • lake restoration • wetland delineation and mitigation analysis 6. Soils and Materials • construction density and material testing • soil borings • pavement structural analysis/testing 7. Structural • reservoirs • buildings • retaining walls • bridges 8. Traffic/Transportation • traffic impact/mitigation analysis • signal/sign justifications • circulation/site plan layout and analysis C. Retained Consultant Services Consultants who can provide professional/technical personnel to serve as an extension of City staff to review development plans for conformance to City comprehensive plans and standards. A retained consultant may also provide regular or Technical/Specialty consulting services if so qualified. V. STATEMENT EVALUATION AND CONTRACT AWARDS A. The City intends to award a contract to the firms evaluated to be best qualified to perform the work for the City with cost, compatibility and other performance factors also considered. 7 B. Based upon the overall evaluation, the City Staff Selection Committee will recommend to the City Council the selection of the firms judged to be the most responsive and responsible applicants. The actual selection will be made by the City Council. C. The City shall not be liable for any expenses incurred by the applicant including but not limited to expenses associated with the preparation of the statement, attendance at interviews, preparation of a cost statement or final contract negotiations. D. The City of Eagan reserves the right to reject any and all statements or to request additional information from all applicants. E. In evaluating whether a consultant is to be included in one of the categories. numerous factors shall be considered. Among those factors are the following: 1 . An evaluation of the consultant's technical qualifications, work experience and available personnel. 2. Recommendations of past and existing clients. 3. Previous experience with the City of Eagan. 4. Actual or potential conflict with other clients doing business with the City. F. Selecting Criteria For Projects For each project requiring consulting services, a municipal engineering consultant will be considered from the proper category of consultants approved by the City Council. The following criteria are used for considering a consultant: 1. The expertise and experience of both the firm and assigned personnel with projects or activities similar to the one under consideration. 2. The consultant's knowledge of particular equipment, methods, time frames and services required. 3. The consultant's ability to mobilize and make sufficient time, and appropriate personnel available to complete the project or activity within a specified time frame. 8 4. The appropriateness and flexibility of the consultant's fee schedule in relationship to the industry, the City's desires and the scope of services to be provided. 5. The past performance of the consultant with regard to existing or previous projects or activities with the City. 6. The current work load of the consultant. VI. CONSULTANT SERVICES PERFORMANCE REVIEW The City intends to assist the successful firms in providing satisfactory services through periodic performance reviews. A copy of this Review Form is attached. VII. CONTRACT EXECUTION A. Negotiations and Contract Execution The City reserves the right to negotiate the final terms and conditions of the contract to be executed. Should the City and a consultant be unable to mutually agree upon the entire contract, the City reserves the right to discontinue negotiations, select another consultant or reject all of the statements. Upon completion of negotiations agreeable to the City and consultant, a contract shall be executed. Contracts will be for a minimum of three (3) years and will be re-evaluated after no more that five (5) years. B. Contracting Ethics 1. No elected official or employee of the City who exercises any responsibilities in the review, approval or implementation of the proposal or contract shall participate in any decision which affects his or her direct or indirect financial interest. 2. It is a breach of ethical standards for any person to offer, give, or agree to give any City employee or Council person, or for any City employee or Council person to solicit, demand, accept, or agree to accept from another person or firm, a gratuity or an offer of employment whenever a reasonable prudent person would conclude that such consideration was motivated by an individual, group or corporate desire to obtain special, preferential, or more favorable treatment than is normally accorded to the general public. 9 1� p 3. The firm shall not assign any interest in this contract and shall not transfer any interest in the same without the prior written consent of the City. 4. To remove any potential or actual conflict of interest, a Regular or Specialty consultant representing any private party client submitting a project or activity to the City shall not represent or review the project or activity on behalf of the City. 5. The firm shall not accept any private client or project which, by nature, places it in ethical conflict during its representation of the City of Eagan. 6. The City requires affirmative action and, therefore, the firm selected shall not discriminate under the contract against any person in accordance with federal, state and local regulations. C. Policy For Engaging Professional Consulting Services 1. SOQ and RFP Procedures All consultants for various services will be selected in accordance with the attached City's Policy. 2. Affirmative Action The City of Eagan, Minnesota, has adopted a policy that it will not discriminate in employment practices on the basis of race, color, creed, religion, national origin, sex age, marital status, public assistance status, veteran status, handicap or disability; that it has agreed to take affirmative action to recruit minorities, women and handicapped persons into its employment; and that it will transactbusiness only with firms who have adoptedsimilar non-discriminatory and affirmative action policies. In cases where a contract with the City of Eagan will exceed $50,000 and the number of full-time employees exceeds twenty (20) in the company making a Proposal, in its Proposal the company must furnish the City of Eagan with documentation that shows the company has adopted a written affirmative action policy. Contracts which exceed $50,000 will not be awarded to companies of more than twenty full-time employees which fail to provide vertification of an affirmative action policy. 10 VIII. CITY INFORMATION A. City Organization The City of Eagan was incorporated in 1974 as a statutory Plan A city. It has a Council-Administrator form of government. The City provides a full array of municipal services and general administrative functions. 1. City Council The Eagan City Council is the final review and approval authority regarding all contracts, payments, plans, improvements, policies, procedures and other business of the City. The City Council, composed of four members and the Mayor, is the legislative and policy making body of the City. The Mayor, who presides over the City Council meetings, and all Councilmembers are elected at large for four-year terms. Set forth on the following table is certain information pertaining to the City Council: NAME TITLE TERM EXPIRES Thomas Egan Mayor 12-31-94 Shawn Hunter Councilmember 12-31-96 Theodore Wachter Councilmember 12-31-94 Pat Awada Councilmember 12-31-94 Sandra Masin Councilmember 12-31-96 2. City Administrator The City Administrator reviews and coordinates all matters coming before the City Council. He is responsible for the implementation of Council direction and coordination and management of City departments on a daily basis. 11 3. City Staff The City Administrator implements Council directions through the Department Heads of six (6) City departments. For purposes of this proposal, the primary department shall be Public Works. However, other Department Heads shall act as the project manager and principal liaison to the consultants for projects/work orders initiated by that specific department. a. Public Works Department This Department consists of 45 employees within three (3) divisions as shown by the organizational chart attached. B. City Statistics 1 . Population The City of Eagan is a rapidly growing suburban community of 34 square miles that has increased its population as shown by the following census figures: 1980 20,700 1985 30,456 1990 47,409 1993 53.500 estimated 2000 63,500 projected 2. infrastructure The City is responsible for maintaining approximately 210 miles of streets. 275 miles of water main, 232 miles of sanitary sewer (10 lift stations) and 160 miles of storm sewer. There are more than 375 lakes, ponds, and/or wetlands interconnected through a complex storm drainage system incorporating 20 lift stations. The City's two Gravity Water Filtration Plants (12 and 16 MGD) are supplied by 17 deep wells and support five separate reservoirs (15.5 MG) and two booster stations (5k gpm) and numerous pressure reducing stations. All utility operations facilities are being interconnected with a System Control and Data Acquisition (SCADA) program. 12 J\ 3 3. Comprehensive Plans The City has accommodated its growth through periodic updates of the following master plans showing the date of latest revision: • Comprehensive Sewer Policy Plan (1988) • Water Supply & distribution Plan (1988) • Stormwater Management Plan (1990) • Water Quality Management Plan (1990) • Storm Water Utility Policy (1990) • Comprehensive Transportation Study (1990) • Park Systems Plan (1993) • Comprehensive Land Use Guide (1993) 4. 5-Year Capital Improvement Program (CIP) The City Council has adopted a 5-Year ('93-'97) CIP with the following major components: Streets (local and county reconstruct) 518,810,000 Utilities (trunk facilities) 5,270,000 13 '44 • �' CONSULTANT SERVICES + or JtOCM" 'I S°" PERFORMANCE REVIEW FIRM: DATE: PRIMARY REPRESENTATIVE: PROJECT MANAGER(S): CITY REVIEWER: CITY PROJECT MANAGER: PROJECT DESCRIPTION: TYPE OF REVIEW (Check One) ❑ Project Initiation Discussion ❑ Periodic Interim Review ( months) ❑ Post-Project Performance Review ❑ Annual Performance Review SERVICES PROVIDED (Check All That Apply) ❑ Research (Reports, Studies, Evaluations, Estimates) ❑ Design (Plans, Specifications, Detail Plates) ❑ Field Services (Inspection, Staking) ❑ Contract/Project Management ❑ Public Presentations Is a detailed Scope of Services necessary for this work? ❑ No ❑ Yes (Attach) 1993 � t v Special Emphasis Needed NA Exceeds * Meets Needs * (For Project Expectations Expectations Attention Initiation Only) (See Comments) (See Comments) CONSULTANT ATTRIBUTES A. EXPERIENCE & KNOWLEDGE 1. Previous experience of ❑ 0 ❑ 0 ❑ assigned personnel with services required on project 2. Technical knowledge of D ❑ ❑ O desion construction techniques. means and methods. 3. Understa nd ng of project's ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ relations`:ip and impact to acacent prope"yes anc or overa'l'l community • (soc o-en. 'C impacts etc ) 4. Inncvat ve thinking ❑ D ❑ ❑ ❑ apprcp•.ate so'u eons and a!tennat ,,es. 5. Kn0.0.7ed2e o' Community. ❑ ❑ D ❑ ❑ State .,o nt, a i'it, and other ag •nc.as and the:- standards, prccedu'es requirements and time fra-nes 6. A:a'iac t. o' experienced ❑ ❑ D ❑ D bac�-up s.;pport personnel 7. ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ D * COMMENTS: (410 / F Special Emphasis Needed NA Exceeds * Meets Needs * (For Project Expectations Expectations Attention Initiation Only) (See Comments) (See Comments) B. COMMUNICATIONS 1. PERSONAL • Presentations. ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ • Frequency of contacts, ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ status reports, inquiries ('How are things going?'), etc. 2. WRITTEN • Complete clear neat ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ cone:se 3. ACCESSIBILITY OF KEY PERSONNEL • Rea : available ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ • Co-,.en ence of leaving ' ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ recei..^^ messages 4. PUBLIC RELATIONS • Em a b, for a"ected ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ p ar.ec • Po"e co.:'te:us ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ professionai 5. ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ * COMMENTS: Special Emphasis Needed NA Exceeds * Meets Needs * (For Project Expectations Expectations Attention Initiation Only) (See Comments) (See Comments) C. SERVICES/WORK PRODUCT 1. PERSONNEL and PROJECT ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ O MANAGEMENT (Project Team and schedule well organized, planned ahead and coordinated with related agencies and control factors). 2. THOROUGH • Researches all pertinent ❑ O O ❑ O resources. • Ouc'ry control (minimal ❑ ❑ O ❑ ❑ re.'.s�ons o' corrections recuired) • Necess^y of Change ❑ ❑ O ❑ ❑ Orders • Addenda 3. CONFORMANCE to community ' ❑ O ❑ ❑ ❑ Indust-, agency standards, perm"s prccec.zes, guide- lines 4. ACCURACY • plans specs, ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ tac,es • Cost estimates (eng neenng ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ se-.ices and construction) 5. PUNCTUALITY (Meets preset ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ or stanca-c time frames or obtains extens.cns in advance) 6. COST CONTROL - (Cost effective- ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ness, value of services provided). 7. FOLLOW-THROUGH • Reviews and checks to insure O O O ❑ ❑ completeness, compliance and satisfaction 8. PRESENTABILITY of Work Product • Garit; of In.,oices O ❑ O ❑ ❑ • Completeness clarity. O ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ appearance of reports, plans. correspondence (See Next Page) 4 l Special Emphasis Needed NA Exceeds * Meets Needs ' (For Project Expectations Expectations Attention Initiation Only) (See Comments) (See Comments) C. SERVICES<:WORK PRODUCT (CONT.) 9. ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ' COMMENTS: D. RELATIONSHIPS 1 Co of Key ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ persc--.e assigned to Cr„, d' inb ,io�ai pr 2 Perso^ne ate responsi.'e ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ coope-at .e and interested in the best ,-terests of ;ease of doing b.:s. _ss 3 B..ji: an_ 7a ,:a'. resat ohs-, ;s v tr • aooto;✓'iate City staff. O ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ • C`,'-e' age-cies and or ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ^panes • contractors ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ 4. Accoan:ability-Willingness ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ to aoHnowledge and correct errors anc deficiencies 5 ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ * COMMENTS: ACKNOWLEDGEMENT & COMMENTS City Representative: Date: (Signature) General Comments: Consultant: Date: (Signature) General Comments: S-0 GUIDELINES FOR EFFECTIVE REVIEW OF CONSULTANT SERVICES INTRODUCTION Professional consultants can be an important part in performing and providing services and programs to the public through various agencies. It is inherent that government officials and consultants work together in a partnership to provide the best in public service. One of the best ways to improve this working relationship is through communication. It is important to identify those things that are necessary for a successful project and areas where special attention and/or additional effort may be necessary. Government officials should recognize the mutual benefits of helping the consultant perform to the best of their abH in meeting the owner's needs and expectations. Similarly, the consultant has a respons : ' t-y to seek out and respond to the suggestions and requests of the owner in provid nc p ai ty services. While evaiustions of consultant services are usually based on past performance, it's greatest benefit will be received if it is also periodically used as a communication tool to maintan and improve the working relationship between the owner and consultant. However. the review of performance can sometimes be difficult. Fortunately, specific tools and p-ocedures can simplify the process and significantly increase the objectivity of this task. The attached Consultant Services Review Form and Guidelines are presented and recornmentet as one of these tools. SUGGESTED WAYS TO USE THE FORM This gene-ai form can be modified for any agency's particular use recognizing that agency needs often vary. This form can also be modified dependent upon its intended use. The fv'iowng are some suggested and recommended uses: • An instrument for discussion during a pre-project planning/scoping meeting to ensure the consultant understands the needs of a particular project. Certain needs would be emphasized while other items may not be as important for a particular project. • An effective tool for continued communication regarding performance and clarification of expectations during work on a project allowing corrective steps to be taken in a timely manner. • A post-project performance review. Based on the needs of a particular project; consultant performance and response to earlier discussion can be evaluated. Pane 2 • An annual (or more frequent) general performance review. Composite performance on all projects can be weighted to reflect the importance of various aspects of the work performed by the consultant. It is strongly recommended that two or three key people from the owner's staff independently complete a preliminary review. They should then meet to discuss and reach a consensus on a composite review which would then be furnished to the consultant prior to a scheduled meeting to discuss the various points in the review form. IMPORTANT: Make sure that significantly positive or corrective ratings are explained and or documented. Use this meeting as an opportunity to mutually agree on how the owner could be better served by the consultant. The goal of the consultant should be to meet the needs of the client. This can be best achievec through frequent communications. This review form is one such method to identify those needs and expectations. ADVISORY NOTE The primary purpose of this form is to assist you in receiving the best consultant services poss e. Wnlle it inherently involves the review of past performance, its greatest benefit wili be received if it is periodically used as a communication tool to improve the working relationship between the owner and the consultant. This standard form is r.lot intended to be used in providing a recommendation for consultant seleotlon to other agencies. The needs of different agencies can vary widely. The abilities and performance of different consultant personnel and how they relate to agency personnel also can often vary. Therefore, an evaluation of a consultant and their representatives in one community may not represent how the consultant will perform for another community. It should be a mutual goal of both the agency and the consultant to have the consultant receive an excellent rating. When used properly, this process can result in a "win - win" situation for both parties with the public being the ultimate winner. 6-4?- EAGAN CITY POLICY FOR ENGAGING PROFESSIONAL CONSULTING SERVICES Professional consulting services such as engineering, legal , architectural and planning do not fall under the state or city competitive bidding process due to the subjective nature of the service provided. Cities, therefore, have latitude to define which vendor or consultant best meets their particular needs and are not constrained to the lowest responsible bid. The public interest should be served, however, through a mechanism which will insure quality service for the dollar spent. The public interest is also served by the maintenance of ongoing ,relationships with reputable and qualified consultants. Nothing in this policy is intended to limit the ability of the City to solicit services and undertake projects in an expeditious manner, presuming that due care is taken to insure a reasonable price for the service provided . I . REYUESTS FOR PROPOSAL • A Pe.7,uest for Proposal (RFP) should be utilized whenever consulting services are retained by the City of Eagan in the following circ..nstances : 1 . A new or previously undefined service, the cumulative value of which exceeds $15 , 000 in any twelve month period. 2 . A regularly retained service (legal , planning, etc. ) at least once every three to five years. 3 . A significant individual project, the service for which exceeds 5100 , 000, if not previously identified in the current scope of work for the RFP for that retainer. A Request for Statements of Qualifications (SOQ) may be used to define an appropriate pool of consultants from which an RFP will be advertised or solicited under the procedures used in the competitive bidding process . An RFP will not be required for significant projects (in excess of 5100 , 000) if a pool of qualified consultants has been retained by Council action and such pool is regularly reconsidered through an RFP process every three to five years. II . CONSULTANT WORK ORDER REQUEST/AUTHORIZATION FORM A Consultant Work Order Request/Authorization Form may be substituted for the RFP/SOQ process whenever consulting services are required by the City and: 1 . The dollar amount does not meet the levels listed above , 2 . The highly specialized services are required for which the qualified firms are relatively few and well known, 3 . The City Council has previously approved the firm as a part of the pool of service providers in the desired discipline through an open selection process or 4 . Time constraints prevent the use of the ordinary RFP/SOQ process . In cases *1-2 , City staff will complete the form, forward it to the Consultant and to the Council for subsequent approval . In case *3 , the consultant will be deemed to be authorized at the selection of the pool by the Council and the approval of the specific project. In case *4 , staff must request prior approval from the City Council to utilize the form and request subsequent approval when arras;errents have been completed. Arrrcved : City Council Action Date: March 19 , 1991 Sc)-- S IL '� : R CONSULTANT WORK ORDER RESPOND BY: REQUEST/AUTHORIZATION FORM ary REQUEST Billing & ❑ Original (Date: ) Correspondence Reference: ❑ Supplemental (See Original Dated: ) Description of Work: I Primary Contact Person: I Requested/Initiated By: Financing Method ❑ Public Improvement Bond (Proj. ) ❑ Other ❑ Development Escrow Account ( / %) ❑ Dept. Budget ( - - - ) % ( %) (_-- - - ) Fund Acct Prog Dept Time Frame CompletionDates'Misc.: CONSULTANT RESPONSE Firm: Attention: Project Manager. - Company File *: Other Ker Ind:v duals . signed Task: 1. 2 Time Schedule Completion Date: Additional Consultant Outside Services Required or Expected: Method of Billing: ❑ % Fee ( Curve A _ Curve B) ❑ Labor & Materials (S ) ❑ Lump Sum (S ) Other Corr.ments: CI'T'Y AUTHORIZATION Approved By / City Authorized Limit: , Employee Date S Council Authorization Date: Processing & Distribution List: Comments: White • City File Copy Green • City Finance Dept. Yellow • Consultant (Final Auth) Pink • Consultant (Pend. Appl) Gold • Department Secretary NOTE: All invoices must be presented to the City within 35 days of incurring chargeable costs to be eligible for payment. Invoices should include current charges. total billings to date and City's authorized limit if identified herein. 5:<- . 3-91 e N P N C 0 U > X L = C .. U J {CCJ� 0• C M U d CC N C N 1 C.7 ' Z = W .- W J Z = - a N C.7 4 2 = O w m O N U (NJ M Cc N W W N W 0 W '- U Z C L7 O U V U 1 L' \ a 0 -, 0 Z .-• W f9 W • N C ) C 4 O U cc W V t27 C - Z 0 - CC) C CD a )- 0 a w C -- O) C Z CC I- .l N 3 \ Y a 6) 0 W U W U Ci O C = a an co Z J W Z Y ' t U Z U C) V) 4 d - > O W O co 7 C - Z N f.7 f- Z W - b- N N L L f7 A 0 Z N 0 a = U CO J W 0 N w N w U 0 4 a N W W , •• N M Q -- N N 1 ' Z I - O .0 a U = L ... U - A W Y U) • W fY N Y CC w C fCpa c` O N > Z W N C) L .C C) E N Qf N .- 7 4 Z Q/ a N Y N E f9 W L Z Z w f9 X L C >, U f7 7 W Cl CC N N CY L fl, O m O f7 W W .- E Z Cc o- Y Z O w = c.7 CC Z .- • = N a a d N C d — - w C — — L7 Z O. V N H Z L Y L It T E w L O = fc -1 I w U -, 3 W m m li. D Q� I 1 0 L W W L • LL O Z O U U I - C I Y W CY CC E , W W C d [Y L 0 R U) N W C C! 0 0 Q Z U J -- O, N 1..... U ' N N a > 1 W Z C, C Z 0 � U w 6) 1 1 Z L D �1 — w a C)•-• LU 0 � U 0 Yil O I 0 U Z Z = N CC w a N W L (-a 0. 10 I i= u o CC U N F- LL. -- W N U C U a• Q )- C W d Y J W N d' [[ 1- - C .- . -6) � W a) C W 1 a O. 10 f(o V -, U W ..�r ^ U^ U ? 4✓ N W N C W ..• - C) U W - 1 A J Ca L .0 d -, U -, Z U CO U N m N M 1 • N [ Z t7 N W O w W C CC N Q U J u1 V( Z CC N W A Q 1 0 .N.I Y .0 N• 1- N W > W ' � ZO •- C CC O L Z � 2 O: N >• N U 0) 7 0 N.- L ■ W C., '■••■•.∎ Z CY 3 W CY •• O Cr ^ U a W - w > C) a = N 0 ° d 1 ° U -* C) L. L d 4 'D N .- C Y J m -5 Z C Z W a O go 3 ♦ N M .t fn .0 0 C N K C w v °a a) ac .- ... C w a j W L N - _ N CC L 1 U L A Z 0• 4 Z W C) Z W N P 3 - O CC)) Cl - fo • C L U - W ce W = _ W 0 C) .0 .. - - S CC OC E - E U O C • _ - N L — N 4✓ m O U a f9 t7 a.W • 0 Z W U Y C) N >. W CO . C[ [[ O ? 0 -•O 0 • GI . .O .0 - U U •0 L - N 3 0 fo 0 Cr - J 7 a) m S CO 3 CC 1C K CY a W N d ea O M N N - . N M J N .O v J c(Q Agenda Information Memo May 4, 1993 City Council Meeting CONSTRUCTION MANAGER RFP S./ through equest for Proposals (RFP), Construction Manager--Enclosed on pages S O through 44 is a memorandum covering the proposed request for a proposal for construction management services for the law enforcement/municipal center expansion. The RFP includes the tentative construction schedule and selection schedule for the construction management firm. Staff has reviewed the RFP and the Scope of Work of the construction manager and find it in order for consideration by the City Council. If approved, RFP distribution will begin on Wednesday, May 5, for those firms which have contacted the City in advance and notices will be placed in the official newspaper and the Construction Bulletin in the first available edition following Council approval. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the RFP for construction management services for the law enforcement/municipal center expansion as presented. 57 MEMO -" —city of eagan TO: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES FROM: ACTING COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR HOHENSTEIN DATE: APRIL 28, 1993 SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL FOR CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT SERVICES - MUNICIPAL CENTER/LAW ENFORCEMENT EXPANSION Attached you will find a copy of the draft Request for Proposal for Construction Management Services associated with the law enforcement/municipal center expansion. City staff has reviewed the RFP and find it in order for consideration by the City Council. Please note that the document includes schedules for the project itself and selection of the construction manager. If approved by the City Council, the RFP notice will be published and copies of the document will be distributed to interested parties. It would be appropriate for the City Council to determine whether they wish to participate in the interviews of finalists or wish staff to complete all screening prior to presentation of a selected proposer at the City Council meeting on June 15, 1993. If you desire additional information with respect to this item, please let me know. This item has been placed on the City Council agenda of May 4, 1993. Thank-you for your attention to this matter. Acti Co unity Development Director JH/js attach. REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT SERVICES CITY OF EAGAN, MINNESOTA I. Project Description The City of Eagan (pop. 53 , 500) is requesting proposals from interested firms to provide construction management services for the construction of an expanded administrative and public safety facility. The facility will be approximately 30, 000 square feet in size encompassing a basement and two floors. The location will be adjacent to the existing Eagan Municipal Center on a parcel of property currently owned by the City. The site and building will be designed to accommodate limited future expansion as service needs require it. The City of Eagan seeks to select a construction management firm to manage and complete this project within the defined time schedule, within a prescribed budget, and within specific quality and program guidelines. The City of Eagan will be contracting with an architectural firm for architectural (plans and specifications) services. A tentative construction schedule is as follows: Selection of Project Architect 7/93 Develop schematic building & site design 8/93 Design development 9/93 Site work begins (by Owner) 10/93 Construction documents 12/93 Bidding 1/94 Start construction 2/94 Final Occupancy 4/95 This project is being coordinated by a Project Team consisting of the City Administrator, Department Heads and the heads of the Protective Inspections and Government Buildings Divisions. The Chief Building Official has been designated as the Project Team Coordinator and will be the principal liaison between the Project Team and the Construction Manager.. From time to time, the Project Team will be augmented by various City Council and staff members for specific tasks or reviews of matters within their areas of expertise. II. Schedule for Contracting with a Construction Management Firm it Council Approval of RFP 5/4/93 Publication of RFP 5/6/93 &/or 5/13/93 5>-,' II RFP's mailed Proposers meeting 5/24/93 Last date for receipt of proposals (4 : 30 pm) 6/02/93 Interviews held for selected proposers 6/14/93 Contract awarded by City Council 6/15/93 Contract period begins 6/21/93 III. Contract between City of Eagan and Construction Manager The STANDARD FORM OF AGREEMENT BETWEEN OWNER AND CONSTRUCTION MANAGER (printed AIA Document B801) will be used as the basic contract for construction management services. The City of Eagan reserves the right to make additions to this AIA document as listed under Article 16 of this document. The City reserves the right to make deletions and modifications to this document which will be detailed in a supplemental document. In the event of any conflict between the terms and conditions stated in any amendments and those in any part of AIA Document B801, the amended document shall supersede the AIA Document B801 and shall govern in all respects. IV. Scope of Work of the Construction Manager 1) Advise the City on the selection of the project architect. 2) Assist in the development of the project budget from information provided by the Owner and architect. 3) Design of the management plan and strategy based on the Owner' s project parameters. 4) Scheduling of project delivery from design through construction. 5) Formation of contract conditions to facilitate the use of the construction management project delivery system. 6) Review of the contract documents prior to issuance to bidders for proposals. 7) Determination of divisions of work to facilitate the multiple bidding process. 8) Identification of Owner-direct purchase items. 9) Review designs during their development. 10) Communicate with and assist architect with bidding contractors to clarify conditions and resolve discrepancies in bidding documents. 11) Assist the Owner during the bidding process to ensure that the receipt of proposals is properly conducted. C.v 12) Review of proposals to determine if those being considered are complete and in the Owner's best interest. 13) Negotiate with contractors on behalf of the Owner and in the best interest of the Owner. 14) Coordinate the signing of contracts and accumulation of required documents. 15) Organize and chair preconstruction meetings with contractors. 16) Develop and implement the construction schedule including the determination of divisions of work to facilitate the phasing of the project in relation to ongoing operations of the facility. 17) Coordinate the contractors at the site on an as needed basis up to and including a full-time basis as directed by the City. 18) Organize and chair project and progress meetings with contractors. 19) Organize and administer a contractor system for expediting material and equipment. 20) Establish and administer a project reporting system. 21) Institute and coordinate a progress payment procedure for contractors. 22) Coordinate and control construction support requirements for the project. 23) Assist the Owner and contractors with respect to any labor relations efforts connected with the project. 24) Prepare and implement the project' s quality management program. 25) Administer contract changes and change order procedures. 26) Maintain and administer a tracking system for the Owner's cost accounting program. 27) Assist in the resolution of disputes arising from the performance of the contractors. 28) Monitor work site for safe working conditions. 29) Coordinate securing of all appropriate building permits. 30) Coordinate the administration and filing of warranties and guarantees. 31) Application of Value Engineering including direction in "constructibility" and "contractibility" decisions. 32) Coordinate with contractors for all required inspections by the City. 33) Coordinate the submittals of Operating and Maintenance Manuals for Owner. 34) Communicate on a daily basis with the Project Manager and on a regular basis with the Project Team concerning the status of the project. V. Instructions to Applicants 1) Applicants must submit ten (10) copies of their proposal by 4 : 30 p.m. , Wednesday, June 2 , 1993 . 2) Proposals should be mailed/delivered to: Jon Hohenstein Acting Community Development Director 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55122 Questions concerning the RFP may be directed to the above- mentioned person at 612-681-4695 until 4 : 30 p.m. , Tuesday, June 1, 1993 . Responses to questions will not be honored after this time. The package containing copies of proposals should be clearly marked "Eagan Municipal Center Expansion Construction Management Service Proposal . " 3) Proposals must provide the following information in this order: a) Company background information. b) Approach to scope of services. c) Construction management approach to this project. d) Basis for compensation. This element must provide a detailed description of the proposed fee schedule to include estimated hours, hourly rates and breakdown of actual and reimbursable costs. The description must also include a total compensation (not-to-exceed) amount. Proposals submitted containing fees determined as a percentage will be disqualified. e) List of references; a minimum of five each for (1) public clients, (2) trade contractors, and (3) architects. f) Qualifications and experiences of individuals of the firm who will be working on this project. g) Any additional information proposer wishes to submit. 4) Applicants are prohibited from contacting any elected official for purposes of lobbying to secure this contract. 5) Proposers will not be permitted to provide any of the archi- tectural , construction or contracting services for this project. (12 6) Individuals of the firm who would be working for the Owner on this project must be present at the interview. 7) The City shall not be liable for any expenses incurred by the proposer in preparing the proposal or making presentation in its regard. VI. Selection Criteria The primary selection criteria will be the proposer's approach to the scope of services. In addition, the firm selected by the City must have demonstrated previous experience in construction management with other municipal center/law enforcement/public safety facilities. Additional criteria used in the selection process will be compatibility of the applicant ' s construction management approach with the requirements of this specific project, cost control methods, definition of fees, rates and actual and reimbursable costs, not to exceed fee, and demonstrated ability to effectively and efficiently manage the project within the Owner' s stated requirements. VII. Affirmative Action The City of Eagan, Minnesota has adopted a policy that it will not discriminate in employment practices on the basis of race, color, creed, religion, national origin, sex, age, marital status, public assistance status, veteran status, handicap or disability; that it has agreed to take affirmative action to recruit minorities, women and handicapped persons into its employment; and that it will transact business only with firms who have adopted similar non-discriminatory and affirmative action policies. In cases where a contract with the City of Eagan will exceed $50, 000 and the number of full-time employees exceeds twenty (20) in the company making a Proposal , in its Proposal the company must furnish the City of Eagan with documentation that shows the company has adopted a written affirmative action policy. This proof is not necessary at the time of the RFP. Contracts which exceed $50, 000 will not be awarded to companies of more than twenty full-time employees which fail to provide verification of an affirmative action policy. VIII. Rights Reserved The City reserves the right to waive any irregularities in any proposal and to select the proposal evaluated to be most advantageous to the City. Further, the City reserves the right to disqualify any proposal or to reject all proposals if it is deemed to be in its best interest. The City shall not be liable for any expenses incurred by the proposer including but not limited to expenses associated with the preparation of the RFP. The City of Eagan reserves the right to reject any and all RFP's or to request additional information from all proposers. L ) The City Council reserves the right to reject any and all bids, to waive irregularities and informalities therein and further reserves the right to award the contract to the best interests of the City. Agenda Information Memo May 4, 1993 City Council Meeting OFF-SALE LIQUOR LICENSE/CHILI'S J. License, On-Sale Liquor, Manager of Chili's, 3625 Pilot Knob Road--Chili's Southwest Bar and Grill was approved for an on-sale liquor license at the October 8, 1992 City Council meeting. The restaurant was not scheduled to open until the spring of 1993. Council directed that the license could not be issued until an as yet unnamed manager had successfully completed the investigation process. Chili's has since named Mr.Phillip Coursin to be manager of the restaurant. Police investigation has uncovered no reason to deny final approval of the on-sale license for Chili's Bar and Grill with Phillip Coursin as manager. A copy of the application is enclosed without page number for the Council's information. (For your information, Chili's is scheduled to open May 24, but it may be later depending upon how fast construction and landscaping are completed.) ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve an on-sale liquor license for Chili's Bar and Grill with Phillip Coursin as manager. BEER AND WINE LICENSES/VILLAGE HOUSE II (QUE VIET) K. License, Beer and Wine,Village House II (Que Viet) 1272 Town Centre Drive--The City has received an application for a beer and wine license at a restaurant to be known as Que Viet at 1272 Town Centre Drive. The application is from Yuri Duc Bui who is president of Village House II, Inc. The conditional use permit to allow beer and wine at this restaurant was approved by the City Council at its April 5 meeting. Investigator John Stevenson has reviewed the beer and wine application and finds no reason to deny it. A copy of the application is enclosed without page number for the Council's information. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve a beer and wine license for the restaurant Que Viet at 1272 Town Centre Drive. Agenda Information Memo May 4, 1993 City Council Meeting GAMBLING LICENSE/EAGAN HOCKEY ASSOCIATION/CHEROKEE SIRLOIN ROOM L. License,Gamblin g,Eagan Hockey Ea an Hocke Association for Pull-Tabs at Cherokee Sirloin Room-- The Eagan Hockey Association has made application for a premises permit to conduct a pull-tab operation at Cherokee Sirloin Room at 4625 Nicols Road. Investigator John Stevenson of the Eagan Police Department has investigated this application and finds no reason to deny it. The license would go into effect August 28, 1993. Enclosed on page Cam( is a copy of the resolution of approval of a premises permit for the Eagan Hockey Association at the Cherokee Sirloin Room. Also enclosed without page number for the Council's information is a copy of the application form. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve a gambling license for the Eagan Hockey Association for pull-tabs at the Cherokee Sirloin Room to go into effect on August 28, 1993. CP RESOLUTION CITY OF EAGAN GAMBLING PERMIT FOR EAGAN HOCKEY ASSOCIATION, INC. ON CHEROKEE SIRLOIN ROOM PREMISES WHEREAS, the Eagan Hockey Association, Inc. has applied for a gambling premise permit to conduct a pull tab operation at Cherokee Sirloin Room, 4625 Nicols Road, and WHEREAS, the Eagan Police Department: has reviewed the application and has not identified any reason to deny. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of Eagan, Dakota County, Minnesota, hereby approves the Eagan Hockey Association application to conduct a pull tab operation at Cherokee Sirloin Room, 4625 Nicols Road. CITY OF EAGAN CITY COUNCIL By: Its Mayor Attest: Its Clerk Motion made by: Seconded by: Those in favor: Those against: CERTIFICATION I , E. J . VanOverbeke , Clerk of the City of Eagan, Dakota County, Minnesota, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted by the City Council of the City of Eagan, Dakota County, Minnesota, in a regular meeting thereof assembled this 4th day of May, 1993. E. J. VanOverbeke, City Clerk Agenda Information Memo May 4, 1993 City Council Meeting DECLARE SURPLUS PROPERTY/PUBLIC AUCTION M. Declare Surplus Property for May 22, 1993 Public Auction--The Council has set May 22, 1993 as the date of the annual City auction. Traditionally, bicycles and other unclaimed property from the Police Department must be declared surplus so they can be included in the auctic ~. Also, there is some equipment owned by the City which is not used at this time and/or has a limited life left. These items also need to be declared surplus property so they may be sold at the auction. A complete list of items to be declared surplus property will be included with the Administrative Agenda packet on Monday, May 3. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To declare bicycles, unclaimed property and miscellaneous City property to be surplus property, all such surplus property to be sold at the annual City auction on Saturday, May 3, at 3830 Pilot Knob Road. LOQ Agenda Information Memo May 4, 1993, City Council Meeting ACKNOWLEDGE COMPLETION (TOWN CENTRE 100 - 5TH ADDITION) N. Contract 88-H,Acknowledge Completion (Town Centre 100- 5th Addition,Waterford Apartments Phase I - Utilities)--Staff has received a request for acknowledgment of completion of utilities installed privately by the developer under the terms and conditions of the Development Agreement under the above-referenced contract. All inspections have been performed by representatives of the Public Works Department and found to be in order for favorable Council action. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To acknowledge completion of Contract 88-H (Town Center 100-5th Addition, Waterford Apartments Phase I-Utilities) and authorize acceptance for perpetual maintenance subject to the appropriate warranty provisions of the Development Contract. ACKNOWLEDGE COMPLETION (TOWN CENTRE 100 - 8TH ADDITION) O. Contract 90-Y,Acknowledge Completion (Town Centre 100-8th Addition (Waterford Apartments Phase II - Utilities)--Staff has received a request for acknowledgment of completion of utilities installed privately by the developer under the terms and conditions of the Development Agreement under the above-referenced contract. All inspections have been performed by representatives of the Public Works Department and found to be in order for favorable Council action. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To acknowledge completion of Contract 90-Y (Town Center 100-8th Addition, Waterford Apartments Phase II-Utilities) and authorize acceptance for perpetual maintenance subject to the appropriate warranty provisions of the Development Contract. Agenda Information Memo May 4, 1993 City Council Meeting AMENDMENT/1993 FEE SCHEDULE P. Amendment to 1993 Fee Schedule, Permit Fee for Motorized Golf Cart--At the March 16, 1993 City Council meeting, the ordinance allowing motorized golf carts on designated streets for purposes of transporting persons with disabilities was approved. Included in the ordinance was reference to a permit fee to be set by the Council. It is recommended by staff that the fee be set at $25 to cover the cost of processing and related record keeping. The permits cover a period of one (1) year from its date of issuance. Permit renewals are required to complete the same application process. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To amend the 1993 Fee Schedule to include a $25 Permit Fee for operation of a motorized golf cart on designated city streets for purposes of transporting persons with disabilities. l-0 Agenda Information Memo May 4, 1993, City Council Meeting VACATION/TOWN CTR 70 - 2ND & 11TH ADDITIONS Q. Vacate Utility Easements,Receive Petition/Order Public Hearing (Town Centre 70 -2nd & 11th Additions)--The staff has received a petition from the developer of the proposed Town Center 70 - 15th Addition (Kohls Department Store) requesting a vacation of an existing drainage and utility easement to facilitate the replatting of a portion of the Town Center 70 - 2nd & 11th Addition to accommodate this new facility. All application materials have been reviewed by staff and found to be in order for favorable Council action of scheduling a public hearing to formally present and discuss this request. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To receive the petition to vacate certain. utility easements located within Town Centre 70 - 2nd & 11th Additions and schedule a public hearing to be held on June 1, 1993. RECEIVE PETITION CEDAR GROVE 4TH ADDN. - STREETLIGHTS R. Project 653,Receive Petition Authorize Feasibility Report (Cedar Grove 4th Addition Streetlights)--Enclosed on pages ..through 21 is a copy of a Petition and a location map the staff received from 116 citizens representing 201 properties requesting the installation of streetlights within the Cedar Grove 4th Addition. These properties constitute 58% of the project area. This Petition is being presented to the City Council for their consideration of authorizing the preparation of a feasibility report to estimate the project cost, benefitted area and preliminary assessment roll. Upon completion of this report, it will be presented to the City Council for their consideration of scheduling a public hearing to formally present this information to all affected property owners. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To receive the Petition and authorize the preparation of the feasibility report for Project 653 (Cedar Grove 4th Addition- a g Streetlights) and schedule a public hearing for June 1. i � ) P � I FOR CITY USE ONLY Petition # . S Date Received iiMPIMall • ' • 2 9 1992 Presented to Council, PETITION LOCATION/SUBDIVISION C EPA , G R o ✓E No, 4 I/We, the undersigned, owners of the real property adjacent to (Street) or within CEP R C Pot/ E No. 4 Subdivision, hereby petition for: Street Improvements • Sanitary S Water Supply (Check requested items) Storm Sewer Streetlights Other (Explain) I/We understand that this petition does not in itself request the installation of these improvements, but rather, request the preparation of a feasibility report in which the estimated costs of these improvements will be tabulated. I/We understand that upon receipt of this petition and the preparation of the requested feasibility report, a public hearing will be held at which time we may voice our support or opposition based on the costs as prepared in said feasibility report. natu e of La d Own/ Address of Property 2. rr •°'f 2, ' 7LJ • 3 C 1 / G`s7 c7,307 4. . ! 73 2oret___ fp 6 Wit . 4► 2.12C G( c� �, C14.. '3 — R •1 'I ` �!, f At357 1 �A. ►.� q, l b4P, 4., hj 3 y IA-ri.r'N O O PC4,gry � ' D ' Dr, 1 FOR CITY USE ONLY Petition / (., 53 Date Received 2 9 199 Presented to Council C.-41.- 7 /PETITION 1I3tAT]:oN!StBDIVISION C E P /Alt : R O V E AI 0 ' 4 I/ e , the undersigned, owners of the real property adjacent to (Street) or within C EDA2 G ROke KD , 4 Subdivision, hereby petition for : Street Improvements Sanitary Sewer Water Supply (Check requested items) Storm Sewer Streetlights L! Other (Explain) :;e understand ;hat this petition does not in itself request the installation ' cf these imprc•:ements , but rather, request the preparation of a feasibility report in which the estimated costs of these improvements will be tabulated. I ..e understand that upon receipt of this petition and the preparation of the requested feasibility report , a public hearing will be held at which time we may voice our support or opposition based on the costs as prepared in said feac=h; ' '`• report . Si. cna-ure of Land O vner Address of Property i . Lbvcktc /�Ct X053 o��v ���—� I // 2 . G �.v,� al��'1 411 g�_ • 3. 2 2 t./ : _ _0l, s'ir Qc. Q..---{Z C-%-/ ZA ca_41___41.14_At_2_1:&____ 5. 4'-(Ziot j9e74''a-- &.e.,64,e.4.4— Zel 6. ?‘re-// 4",- X0.1''7 C�ccez."- z. (a,,ti2_ 1 , �� Q `.H / '1 dal/ a . QA' r 1.11. i as 8 1 , QSA-an A-1 17- 4-N , Fef-:440ti $t GoS3 RECEIVED APR 2 9 1993 Przfsewz, ro cov..4: I S- 4- -93 • 2c4-ut _ oe- Gc ate_ - • °P - zo 7 Y • CcCC ji"y1-rr 34c77 020'9 Q c.c4z-h. fin. ' 7. ' _ ! / > - . • ' lecic„(.0 • 61)1 Lk.A. a c2,./a4 3 / iii 414 944 ta-re ?/C'b , i / ) p 1 • FOR CITY USE ONLY Petition # l r_�,r- ntyse - 2 g 199ii Presented to Council s`- ¢ •93' PETITION LOCATION/SUBDIVISION c Es) G R o ✓E No, 4 I/We, the undersigned, owners of the real property adjacent to • (Street) or within C E PA R C ROC, E l`io. 4 Subdivision, hereby petition for: Street Improvements Sanitary S Water Supply (Check requested items) Storm Sewer Streetlights i Other (Explain) I/We understand that this petition does not in itself request the installation of these improvements, but rather, request the preparation of a feasibility report it which the estimated costs of these improvements will be tabulated. I/We understand that upon receipt of this petition and the preparation of the requested feasibility report, a public hearing will be held at which time we may voice our support or opposition based on the costs as prepared in said feasibility report. ,Signatur-€ cf Land Owner Address of Property 1 . _ —Z _AO 31,t"4-- r (.)1 r� 2_ / A � , ?Z 7 Cb r• 2-7k 12.!7_7 / 3 , %'- �.3� 7 � W' /� s. 2----/a,- „,_ t`..3 f.z As oK � D/' 6. / /,/././1/77-7 i r/ 11 �� d ' f5 y3G 5' Duman a Li3 2 D ,._, CDC, q _.r . � "),\3,t---\a • 701 it USE ONLY "Petition O " S Date teceived i1-11l l&'A I • • • 2 9 19' Presented to Council — PETITION LOCATION/SUBDIVISION c P,4 le G g o ✓E No, 4 I/We, the undersigned, owners of the real property adjacent to - (Street) or within CEDAg ROLE Mo. 4 Subdivision, hereby petition for: Street Improvements • Sanitary Sr Water Supply (Check requested items) Storm Sewer Streetlights Other (Explain) I/We understand that this petition does not in itself request the installation of these improvements, but rather, request the preparation of a feasibility report in which the estimated costs of these improvements vill be tabulated. I/We understand that upon receipt of this petition and the preparation of the requested feasibility report, a public hearing will be held at which time we may voice our support or opposition based on the costs as prepared in said feasibility report. $icnature of ,xnd Owner � _Address of Property 1• 11/. .. 4 I J//alf _ •' _ ■.: 3. . ice— _� _ s % l _���� 4. 2e J L CooPe e L,4 nom_ 5. ' �M--- 2a 9D . Cam' , S' . • y35y Coe 4 e •/j �,20�� 021 - �� Zr- 1, C• P e)- 44— , S-444- df- A016 y FOR CITY USE ONLY Petition # 643 Date Received RELINED AR 2 9 ;.9a3 Presented to Council $ - 4 • 3 PETITION IACATION/SUBDIVISION C D fk G go V E N o, I/We, the undersigned, owners of the real property adjacent to (Street) or within CEDAR C Po v E 14. 4 Subdivision, hereby petition for: Street Improvements Sanitary S , Water Supply (Check requested items) Storm Sewer Streetlights Other (Explain) I/We understand that this petition does not in itself request the installation of these improvements, but rather, request the preparation of a feasibility report in which the estimated costs of these improvements will be tabulated. I/We understand that upon receipt of this petition and the preparation of the requested feasibility report, a public hearing will be held at which time we may voice our support or opposition based on the costs as prepared in said feasibility report. ,Signs ure of Land Owner Address of Prooerty T�`'• I. J`pr . �s4 ce p 2. I y3 i 41 Pt, `� , 3. f � AD-51 ear 6A,,t.[ 4. --- 117146, 0.-90/14 r2Z514 0-41:11.14 1741. 5. // '1l� Ac// 4/ 2oW CeyrtG j 6.( i _ ?CAI' Vag'j • yyy 4/4111•.' a r 1 S- ... ea (3G 7 o /rt.KmkcC 9, 44-4.-424---:?f .f5160 101.Co 1 . Pi. I° „�,G,- PA CITY USE ONLY Petition # 653 Date Received : . . N , ' 2 9 1933 Presented to Council ;Arnow PETITION LOCATION/SUBDIVISION c FDA g G go ✓E No. it* I/We, the undersigned, owners of the real property adjacent to • (Street) or within C EPA g ,C P01/ E /'o. 4 Subdivision, hereby petition for: Street Improvements Sanitary S - Water Supply (Check requested items) Storm Sewer Streetlights Other (Explain) I/We understand that this petition does not in itself request the installation of these improvements, but rather, request the preparation of a feasibility report in which the estimated costs of these improvements will be tabulated. I/We understand that upon receipt of this petition and the preparation of the requested feasibility report, a public hearing will be held at which time we may voice our support or opposition based on the costs as prepared in said feasibility report. Sitr,ature of Land Owner Address of Proterty 1. trat-a AZ0 . C1mQo 1K) �/D 'S/ 2.M.A' * 5 n�to. ( Z1 Z-Z S t L _ 3. 9\133 _S14.40L6 L./0 4. - � >G 10 Ce S. i' _. a-0 4 / C ff0/�>� Or/ 49,s, 6• 5 1-�-fJ Gf ao 93 r a C_i'o SkL 4. / / o a.:7,,a.7r, 47'..7.x/ T\ • • • FOR CITY USE ONLY Petition if 6,53 Date Received. _ 1A6 Presented to Counc _.1--IF- • PETITION LOCATION/SUBDIVISION C F P14 g C got/6 N o, 4 I/We, the undersigned, owners of the real property adjacent to (Street) or within C EPA Poi E t o. 4 Subdivision, hereby petition for: Street Improvements • Sanitary S Water Supply (Check requested items) Storm Sewer Streetlights y Other (Explain) I/We understand that this petition does not in itself request the installation of these improvements, but rather, request the preparation of a feasibility report in which the estimated costs of these improvements will be tabulated. I/We understand that upon receipt of this petition and the preparation of the requested feasibility report, a public hearing will be held at which time we may voice our support or opposition based on the costs as prepared in said • feasibility report. $ienature of Land Owner Address of Property 2. ' . 0 ( lo }�44 LF C�,z1 g .O I � I� 3 ♦�,. . 1 _4_L:� alb.4044 • MGM 4. .•— c-o F3 5. ,.6.L.C.•(/).-et.4-r)-- do 6• q 33- (' { , e C' — — TOR CITY USE ONLY Petition # 4,5—i � Date e EIVEI arr. 2 9 1913 Presentrated d to to Count - PETITION LOCATION/SUBDIVISION C FDA g Giza ✓E No, 4 I/We, the undersigned, owners of the real property adjacent to • (Street) or within C EPA D2 C Pot/ E No. 4 Subdivision, hereby petition for: Street Improvements Sanitary S - Water Supply (Check requested items) Storm Sewer I. Streetlights Other (Explain) I/We understand that this petition does not in itself request the installation of these improvements, but rather, request the preparation of a feasibility report in which the estimated costs of these improvements will be tabulated. I/We understand that upon receipt of this petition and the preparation of the requested feasibility report, a public hearing will be held at which time we may voice our support or opposition based on the costs as prepared in said feasibility report. Sirnatur .f Land a Address of Property 1. i�'�i� :':. A __ b,9' Co • • ' r 40)ily 2. �' /ir I/��//LL1/ 6 r Cam./' j%iI 0 3 9 S c /3. /l J e cry ��fL 1 I 4. Ont i q,3 9- 1)r. 5. 4/375 . Sal7dstah2H , 6. kciUt/Q-- i/l/ka'c.. gZi /. q, tO- • � • FOR CITY USE ONLY • Petition # 4.41:r Date Received RitCF VI O - - 2 Presented to Council S— -q j' PETITION •LOCATION/SUBDIVISION C G g o ✓E No. '- I/We, the undersigned, owners of the real property adjacent to • (Street) or within C PM g C go E /40. 4 Subdivision, hereby petition for: Street Improvements • Sanitary S - Water Supply (Check requested items) Storm Sewer Streetlights Other (Explain) I/We understand that this petition does not in itself request the installation of these improvements, but rather, request the preparation of a feasibility report in which the estimated costs of these improvements will be tabulated. I/We understand that upon receipt of this petition and the preparation of the requested feasibility report, a public hearing will be held at which time we may voice our support or opposition based on the costs as prepared in said • feasibility report. ,Signa,ture of Land Owner Address of Property I i 2 '. ,'s_ /. �CJ 5 S4'// i 3 • _ A 4. � _ .41,...1 Bk. r 5. .261 L/ 6. �� � a. I dr go. _ c c 6 �✓ 1 c f (/c/ V Z u/C q, 11111111111111A119111111i1,1510111ri (...1 AA/ Mr � v • FOR CITY USE ONLY Petition # (053 Date Received RECEIVED ^^ 2 2 1 S Presented to Councils-4 -g3 PETITION LOCATION/SUBDIVISION C CDR g G g o ✓E No. 4 I/We, the undersigned, owners of the real property adjacent to • • (Street) or within C E P,4 , C Po ti E No. 4 Subdivision, hereby petition for: Street Improvements • Sanitary S . Water Supply (Check requested items) Storm Sewer Streetlights i Other (Explain) I/We understand that this petition does not in itself request the installation of these improvements, but rather, request the preparation of a feasibility report in which the estimated costs of these improvements will be tabulated. I/We understand that upon receipt of this petition and the preparation of the requested feasibility report, a public hearing will be held at which time we may voice our support or opposition based on the costs as prepared in said • feasibility report. $iznature of Land Owner Address of Proter y 1. i • X L� , 4410---4- 4-7/3 55 y 3. 4. S. 6. 4, O • • • FOR CITY USE ONLY Petition Q 0%3 Date Received i� Presented to Council �'— 4- f PETITION d LOCATION/SUBDIVISION C �D A g C> fZ o VE No, T I/We, the undersigned, owners of the real property adjacent to (Street) or within C E PA g C (.'0 L' E /ro. 4 Subdivision, hereby petition for: Street Improvements Sanitary S - Water Supply (Check requested items) Storm Sewer Streetlights Other (Explain) I!We understand that this petition does not in itself request the installation of these improvements , but rather, request the preparation of a feasibility report in which the estimated costs of these improvements will be tabulated. I/We understand that upon receipt of this petition and the preparation of the requested feasibility report , a public hearing will be held at which time we may voice our support or opposition based on the costs as prepared in said • feasibility report . S r re of Lan der Address of Proterty I 2. ' 7' `l� �;� �� V x �y • - 3. �i �; l� � � � �V �� ��' A 1, , 4 7\4: L t'� Y �4� I ✓ 6 . `� 7 2) • FOR C DSE ONLY Petition # SOS Date Received NE_Ci- \, Presented to Council S— ¢ - 43 PETITION LOCATION/SUBDIVISION C D14 g G R 0 ✓E NO, 4 live, the undersigned, owners of the real property adjacent to • (Street) or within C E P,4 g C RD l/ E /4o. 4 Subdivision, hereby petition for: Street Improvements • Sanitary S Water Supply (Check requested items) Storm Sewer Streetlights Other (Explain) I/We understand that this petition does not in itself request the installation of these improvements, but rather, request the preparation of a feasibility report in which the estimated costs of these improvements will be tabulated. 1/we understand that upon receipt of this petition and the preparation of the requested feasibility report, a public hearing will be held at which time we may voice our support or opposition based on the costs as prepared in said feasibility report. $ienature of Land Owner Address of Proterty y 1. a 4(2 x .2 /1-./i c,zs 2. • y ,v,"le 0- _1 s Foy 3 � - sue �jl�3 FSQ s A s-r et �� o 4. 5. 6 . 1 9, S RECE".`_n hr.7 r ,- . . _ ,.1_ FOR CITY USE ONLY Petition # GS3 Date Received nrArt11_L Presented to Council 3-4. - 9L3 PETITION d LOCATION/SUBDIVISION C FDA 2 C F 0 ✓E No. 4 I/We, the undersigned, owners of the real property adjacent to • (Street) or within CEP A y2 CPO l/ E No. 4 Subdivision, hereby petition for: Street Improvements Sanitary S - Water Supply (Check requested items) Storm Sewer Streetlights V Other (Explain) • I/We understand that this petition does not in itself request the installation of these improvements , but rather, request the preparation of a feasibility report in which the estimated costs of these improvements will be tabulated. I/'»e understand that upon receipt of this petition and the preparation of the requested feasibility report, a public hearing will be held at which time we may voice our support or opposition based on the costs as prepared in said • feasibility report. Signatxre of Land Omer Address of Prooert 1. Q-i J/7 v " _ 2. / I 1 .. ,. i. 2g a4_.e . '',I1 ( - 3. 1k' */ MIS \ c L a 01, , 4. ` ill,C_ �" a- -.-ate -3`3 r- 57, - - _ (L _ 6. 4? Z - <---- i a /. ' 3 I . a 6 It' - r • L-}3 yL4 DY\yx ! r 1 , --/ h i L;},6,_. T dElliellr 1,1:(222.. Q . • v__. I • FOR CITY USE ONLY Petition '/ �es3 Date Received RECE y i i Presented to Council S- ¢-Q; /PETITION LOCATION/SUBDIVISION C E 6 A � 1, R 0 I/We, the undersigned, owners of the real property adjacent to • (Street) or within C E D A R G R 0 V a /f b . ¢ Subdivision, hereby petition for: Street Improvements Sanitary Sewer Water Supply (Check requested items) Storm Sewer Streetlights Other (Explain) I ^We understand that this petition does not in itself request the installation of these improvements, but rather, request the preparation of a feasibility report in which the estimated costs of these improvements will be tabulated. I/We understand that upon receipt of this petition and the preparation of the requested feasibility report, a public hearing will be held at which time we may voice our support or opposition based on the costs as prepared in said feasibility report. Si€naturl of Land O r Address of Pr nerty 1 . L / 'nu' "l4 L Lf% <�., l 3 . - _ 5 . 6 . (JD CO c� :° Cri (1) a Z—C t OvO ' VHb�! m �— 1 a .-�- > Q. -� \ " " .rink■ co et° 3N01 SONVS / •1 - 1-7--- N Lzoz otoz■ IcOZ V1615.440 .. .:. *.*:0.11: ::o _ 4Q� h O ® .....,.' V:. ,)4o` .SOZ• y,\ \,:_,./414110 4 .4':- 471 090?■ Z -- \ \ \-1' ....7! kin ''' rh Ell 9902 • O `\ / Q _\ ' O o , e` \ ±&IfrAfin : •. tLO2 •■ L (CI Z Q P, . • ac W -- -- 7. .... $ 1 s1t` u u u Z > Z L °A1a6 8 } \, 9 L 6' CI) CC O 1• '■ 1 W 4�.• Z90Z 1602 ' H H• , Ze 0 l�\ r cztoet 3 Z0Z u u= O J t st 660? to c•. O W 0 r ' tetz x •ti>■ a 0 W ep•W �� 2 8cor L 0 t Z fitft.f■ , u o a A U - . U T .4:JP, JP t .°�' `'90� t t t Z BO t Z ■ o" u CO t O •� z n�®� • a a, a, ,{�y.�.,.,� 4.6 1 0. . 9 4 :., .. S t t z v 0 0 opt s5ot. r6�, F• it-a--.X.> C: 6 t t z ••� u u C d' . 9 t t Z ■ -%i ¢i.r.: d b3 -0O tztz L cr �6o fC � u o . a >';. ,� t. •rt•cz. so t z oo .::' :a�. � N e a. Szst: 43 =: s bs:t� =. z• dO -NOrrria u L L Z — _ • 00 N i tttZ c I I V 1 I - i n 'Sir}.'Y riC:• .•�'p�_ OI \ rr _ ,.., w�f 1 :44 CO . C, a 1 Q OVOM S 1O IN '� D a 3 0 >+ f lifr.; 11.? U Oc 9z Agenda Information Memo May 4, 1993, City Council Meeting RECEIVE PETITION CEDAR GROVE 3RD ADDN. - STREETLIGHTS S. Project 652,Receive Petition/Authorize Feasibility Report (Cedar Grove 3rd Addition Streetlights)--Enclosed on pages through ql is a copy of a Petition and a location map the staff received from 80 itizens representing 177 properties requesting the installation of streetlights within the Cedar Grove 3rd Addition. These properties constitute 45% of the project area. This Petition is being presented to the City Council for their consideration of authorizing the preparation of a feasibility report to estimate the project cost, benefitted area and preliminary assessment roll. Upon completion of this report, it will be presented to the City Council for their consideration of scheduling a public hearing to formally present this information to all affected property owners. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To receive the Petition and authorize the preparation of the feasibility report for Project 652 (Cedar Grove 3rd Addition- Streetlights) and schedule a public hearing for June 1. FOR CITY USE ONLY Petition # 6 Z- V\, Date Received �^ ? 9 tggd /r ,.,2 Presented to Councils' Q — PETITION LOCATION/SUBDIVISION C E D A P C ROVE NO 3 I/We, the undersigned, owners of the real property adjacent to • (Street) or within C c..10.- 6✓-0.„4.e., N4 , 3 Subdivision, hereby petition for: Street Improvements Sanitary Sewer Water Supply (Check requested items) Storm Sewer Streetlights ✓ - Other (Explain) I/'We understand that this petition does not in itself request the installation of these improvements , but rather, request the preparation of a feasibility report in which the estimated costs of these improvements will be tabulated. I/We understand that upon receipt of this petition and the preparation of the requested feasibility report, a public hearing will be held at which time we may voice our support or opposition based on the costs as prepared in said fea=4 'ity report. S'Ena- e of Land Owner Address of Property 3. /" [,. 1... r 9 L e(i—-4--r u—,</ U 4 . ,lv/-"4—r� 4,6-- .. co.P 9-C 5 , Zee __..., ,...ei , 44.4/,-) 3 eii-ii4e..4,- XI r 7, CL—,_ 3. _ .a v-1 O C ti-,-- 14,, , 9 , ` -\..c.� 4-1 a 2_0`) 3 C.r1 rit �.�r •.• . v 1: `,_..:),uiL,-,-��r 3- �i 11 g Cc tinr h 1 J • b9 • FOR CITY USE ONLY Petition # (752- Date Received ri.7- i 'i `" ' 2 Presented to Council S Q -q1 it PETITION LOCATION/SUBDIVISION C E D A.e C R Q v E NO I/We, the undersigned, owners of the real property adjacent to • (Street) or within 6 e J 6r e N o, 3 Subdivision, hereby petition for: Street Improvements Sanitary Sewer Water Supply (Check requested items) Storm Sewer Streetlights ✓ Other (Explain) I/'we understand that this petition does not in itself request the installation of these improvements , but rather, request the preparation of a feasibility report in which the estimated costs of these improvements will be tabulated. I/We understand that upon receipt of this petition and the preparation of the requested feasibility report, a public hearing will be held at which time we may voice our support or opposition based on the costs as prepared in said feasibility report. Signature of Land Owner Address of Prooerty 1 . ' 5 . it "'� ' l7' /i J 6 f �1. � - C f- 04 Dom°/� ' _ _' FOR CITY USE ONLY Petition # 6 5y Date Received R .L. V- Presented to Council S-4 47 PETITION LOCATION/SUBDIVISION C E P A le GROVE NO 3 I/We, the undersigned, owners of the real property adjacent to • (Street) or within C P.pLa r G U{i Ai 0 . 3 Subdivision, hereby petition for: Street Improvements Sanitary Sewer Water Supply (Check requested items) Storm Sewer Streetlights ✓ • Other (Explain) I/We understand that this petition does not in itself request the installation of these improvements , but rather, request the preparation of a feasibility report in which the estimated costs of these improvements will be tabulated. I/'tee understand that upon receipt of this petition and the preparation of the requested feasibility report, a public hearing will be held at which time we may voice our support or opposition based on the costs as prepared in said feasibility report. yicnature of Land Owner Address of Property 1 . r_ ` ' c` / �-- 4. 177 . ,�.�, �-� D .Q t tee . ' ( 1 FOR CITY USE ONLY Petition 0 [2SZReM..�..,-, _ _ Date Received 2 9 19 Presented to Council 5 4 PETITION LOCATION/SUBDIVISION C FDA C GROVE N D 3 I/We, the undersigned, owners of the real property adjacent to • (Street) or within C, pd Ar 6 r0 cr N0, 3 Subdivision, hereby petition for: Street Improvements Sanitary Sewer Water Supply (Check requested items) Storm Sewer Streetlights ✓ - Other (Explain) I/We understand that this petition does not in itself request the installation of these improvements , but rather, request the preparation of a feasibility report in which the estimated costs of these improvements will be tabulated. 1/We understand that upon receipt of this petition and the preparation of the requested feasibility report, a public hearing will be held at which time we may voice our support or opposition based on the costs as prepared in said feasibility report . i€nature of Land Owner -Address of Property 1 . L YJ �i \ ,,'. ,k_r J . LL ---7 ia,l.._LLct'Y\S_ L� 2 -s. 71----1 7.-.0'5"--3 �/Lc.S /- -C �c-, ri I 4. `� -, :2 C q C� l� 4a,...„..c.4, 5. � ' Z:-7-17:167 / 6.Al i /! �0 /c �e 5 To I,r 42- � 01 7 /' 8 cc ,'/vim ZQ/Q i 9 ,�-*�✓ w� �Zo33 Pyres C.rC- „ZQ,f_e 1._..a.:7 1-712/-/11.7 01 Z 3 0 45,ii_u;__41_4r-1,2_74.f qt. - FOR CITY USE ONLY Petition # 4,52- Date Received R '1A1VELj t pr 2 9 1!.-191.Presented to Council 5-447' PETITION IACATION/SUBDIVISION C E PA' 6 R o V E NO 3 I/We, the undersigned, owners of the real property adjacent to • • f� (Street) or within (12, e G(, Q•f' 6 r'O VL° AJd, 3 Subdivision, hereby petition for: Street Improvements Sanitary Sewer water Supply (Check requested items) Storm Sewer Streetlights ✓ • Other (Explain) I »e understand that this petition does not in itself request the installation of these improvements , but rather, request the preparation of a feasibility report in which the estimated costs of these improvements will be tabulated. I;»'e understand that upon receipt of this petition and the preparation of the requested feasibility report, a public hearing will be held at which time we may voice our support or opposition based on the costs as prepared in said feasibility report . 5io,rature of Land Owmer Address of Property �C c J/L E S fz4? L /1) i 3 Z 4 l77. i/�C J lYike, C/;/ £1 L'f c ?YJP G+Ct fr 4. /• f L. - i 1 C/7-7 J 5. Ci,_k1 ,r� i C1,..) 3,0 -. 19/U r°,S ?�,fl e rv. /"i l7 1 r /� l iII ' ''03 ,--i. ,� L-Z v\ C----(___°) . FOR CITY USE ONLY Petition 0 ` 5:1 Date Received Presented to CjilFrEiVEktn 2 9 1995 q_7 !v e PETITION L' LOCATION/SUBDIVISION c e p A g 6 ^ a V e, o I/We, the undersigned, owners of the real property adjacent to (Street) or within L' e 0 A 2 GROVE No, 3 Subdivision, hereby petition for: Street Improvements Sanitary Sewer Water Supply (Check requested items) Storm Sewer Streetlights Other (Explain) I/:;e understand that this petition does not in itself request the installation of these improvements , but rather, request the preparation of a feasibility report in which the estimated costs of these improvements will be tabulated. I 'We understand that upon receipt of this petition and the preparation of the requested feasibility report, a public hearing will be held at which time we may voice our support or opposition based on the costs as prepared in said feasibility report . Sifnat -.e of Land Owner Address of Property 1 . A mil . t, ./ ._ �� .20 2 �/ , ' t•\I 1 • 7 3, ;4k,); —a L2 I Q -- 070 .. ,/. ' ,dip 4. 6 . 1Lt .- YL / • ,2040 6 8-7-07 -:95 021o1 FOR CITY USE ONLY Petition # 6,52- Date Received -"1E_ A.' 4 2 9 199 Presented to Council 1- 4 PETITION LOCATION/SUBDIVISION C E DAB' G R O V E NO . 3 I/We, the undersigned, owners of the real property adjacent to • // (Street) or within C e � - y r 6- f D Ve- NO . 3 Subdivision, hereby petition for: Street Improvements Sanitary Sewer Water Supply (Check requested items) Storm Sewer Streetlights ✓ • Other (Explain) I we understand that this petition does not in itself request the installation of these improvements , but rather, request the preparation of a feasibility report in which the estimated costs of these improvements will be tabulated. I/We understand that upon receipt of this petition and the preparation of the requested feasibility report, a public hearing will be held at which time we may voice our support or opposition based on the costs as prepared in said feasibility report . Sixnature cf Land Owner Address of osertv �1 a' _ :i .a �2 . -9D J/4 n 7 3. .'1�.1�.`;- r P / 3 ! - - /0 T 4. � . � v a, /'' / 116 6 .,hi v l'o.,., Ln . 5 . TS ;11 aW ? C,arne_lrctn L.qn *e- 6 . ti II. - _ c iorp Corneba.n La.ne ef F(- [ • -`Ate%ti 043 , ' 01. ■ / (/ - C?..) - • FOR CIj'Y USE ONLY Petition / (o5 1 Date Received 2 9 191 Presented to Council 5-4- PETITION LOCATION/SUBDIVISION CEDA.2 6RDVE No 3 I/We, the undersigned, owners of the real property adjacent to • (Street) or within C °� 0( a•-r- 6-T'b yr, N0 , 3 Subdivision, hereby petition for: Street Improvements Sanitary Sewer Water Supply (Check requested items) Storm Sewer Streetlights ✓ - Other (Explain) I !We understand that this petition does not in itself request the installation of these improvements , but rather, request the preparation of a feasibility report in which the estimated costs of these improvements will be tabulated. I/ 'e understand that upon receipt of this petition and the preparation of the requested feasibility report, a public hearing will be held at which time we may voice our support or opposition based on the costs as prepared in said feasibility report. Signature of Land Own r Address of Property 1 . C 2 ✓ !/ 4111Car y,._% / /3 , / 4. F'; Y c44.()&Z *2 4>• 5. h? / (it,'4.4- ---n- 6. �► i`. 7■�►� ' ._AO .�' )7/ "762/ .11� _iA.�..i. / 41 rite/ _ C Afft #.1.5 _ ' • 5 /,"4 r I . ■ .■ ..■ .A■I , � J I• rw7- O\ Cc> FOR SZTY USE ONLY Petition # ��t� Date Received RareVEL NR' 2 s `? Presented to Council 5- 4 -93 PETITION LOCATION/SUBDIVISION C E P A E 6 ROVE N D_ I/We, the undersigned, owners of the real property adjacent to • � e /L, tt (Street) or within l ` eI dn"' GeV V� Al.! G 1 43 Subdivision, hereby petition for: Street Improvements Sanitary Sewer Water Supply (Check requested items) Storm Sewer Streetlights ✓ Other (Explain) I ^tee understand that this petition does not in itself request the installation of these improvements , but rather, request the preparation of a feasibility report in which the estimated costs of these improvements will be tabulated. I% e understand that upon receipt of this petition and the preparation of the requested feasibility report, a public hearing will be held at which time we may voice our support or opposition based on the costs as prepared in said feasibility report . Signature of Land 0 -ner Address of Property l --r. �_ c-‘, r = 47/-/ rs fi 4. , 5. 6. F 9 _ R � • ANEW , RI C m CO 03 v As- t' o r .0tOZ U90y:©� >lOL t OZ olgligh 010Z a• *: >c '' 810Z 4i0 Z 810Z .L lam' �' L t 0Z 810Z a Ig; cz a02: L0 Z 1 z0L ZZOZ 0 co ZZ' LLOZ ZZk7I �SLOd $M. SZ�Z ..k StOt 9t SZOL 9Z0Z � f Ot •Z0 F.. DfAZ -Qe 6Z0Z OCOL *6Z0Z i7fOZ q<le. rFOt . ictoz S : BfOZ 40.0z tip Fr rr�Ot - L 4 �} 4r r odo1 c�t?Z $tflZ ZooZ� 5y 0= Fir ` , p Z1, c, 20a5 44c 9tpr t: ■�`�1 94F}� 2°/G,0 h . osot 52 trot � ryrGZ m OSOL opt \ °� r�q $rpr. 96Ot ' �y� 11 ' `ti 0 CCOt 0( �6+0Z rso w' o� ^ zOt �: t r z i o p; �o /dam ZOt FSLO 7 i ° _ v h �� ry�� d 4).''''N.. 990t N/, 'BSOt Z ` t s co v u, /7�� 6g 9 ,V,'� no v - - -J 0 C3 O ►4QZ. 0t 90t , /Q._ ,t (N w v 411 (0 Z J N '.90 $��, o'ot 71Q3•: a `W V) eZ V r� �/ ; , i u N 41 o / W • 5 p tg0 Ot z 6- .gg t LO ` I u u _ p p 3 3 rkiz 581,,-,,,et r9�. �,7> T< Q�� o o W tt2�� • z60Z • r60t 9802 0, te. v OC 4♦� I0,t CT 8 _ �60e '' / , / c ❑ Er 0 J Lu Q r- sore dd14: 60t o u u a W liJ n Rs Sa,4. 4Qit. 8601 o T a w 0 3 CC ca d y O c t 0 o ` a cc Hms,C,1 (n v -id o .. ..T 007,Z °0 o w s CC ti $3Z o o ONp pR _ 'o o co �: p1AM e e a cc 0 0 • •l0 . ii sc L. lX Y 2 _. .... - V l+ L f'lag a j p QNQ,.:fir: L�1L ,:� ,° - ti-•.— _ L 1 gi °. f n -id(13NdViD t'Q .L31 3NdV: Z nr — . Z • �1Z. Qt? C cw / 0>04 n• ►90♦ 1 J Y CC QQec57030141 d 3w l o 0 ›N takii;i11. � PT AT 0911zc • 9 � Agenda Information Memo May 4, 1993, City Council Meeting RECEIVE PETITION CEDAR GROVE 5Th ADDN. - STREETLIGHTS T. Project 654,Receive Petition/Authorize Feasibility Report (Cedar Grove 5th Addition Streetlights)--Enclosed on pages 1pp through is a copy of a Petition and a location map the staff received from 110 citizens representing 208 properties requesting the installation of streetlights within the Cedar Grove 5th Addition. These properties constitute 539 of the project area. This Petition is being presented to the City Council for their consideration of authorizing the preparation of a feasibility report to estimate the project cost, benefitted area and preliminary assessment roll. Upon completion of this report, it will be presented to the City Council for their consideration of scheduling a public hearing to formally present this information to all affected property owners. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To receive the Petition and authorize the preparation of the feasibility report for Project 654 (Cedar Grove 5th Addition- Streetlights) and schedule a public hearing for June 1. FOR CITY USE ONLY Petition 0 45+ Date Received Ru Z �yED ApR Presented to Co 2 9 1993 f PETITION LOCATION/SUBDIVISION C FU*r G .'e H o. e adjacent to the undersigned, property ad j I/�7e, th ned, owners of the real prop rt g (Street) or within G EDPL 6 PO - r No , Subdivision, hereby petition for: Street Improvements Sanitary Sewer Water Supply (Check requested items) .storm Sewer Streetlights Other (Explain) I/7,e understand that this petition does not in itself request the installation of these improvements , but rather, request the preparation of a feasibility report in which the estimated costs of these improvements will be tabulated. I/We understand that upon receipt of this petition and the preparation of the requested feasibility report, a public hearing will be held at which time we may voice our support or opposition based on the costs as prepared in said feasibility report. Signature of Land Owner Address of Property 1 . 1/. 71 7-4-1_ P‘ g7 3. 1 � ,. 'R7 -7 4. -;(// I 4:4 /4-11.1l-i' 4-1C; 5. ,� '3qc,c Putki ,c.,2 L N 6 . 1 c�z�I l E 7 ��t ,i,,t e LL '�� �Z J e /c�, le(-r.� c (S 77 2. 6:;4-,*,-/* -I:114 7—wo s€_ I c� 1 �—t�-� 7 S."6( ' 3 9.3 7 -\ 00 4 FOR CITY USE ONLY tRece . 4 Date RECEIVED AFR 2 g lgg3 Presented to Council Jr-4- 91r PETITION LOCATION/SUBDIVISION 0411- G -0 v--c- I/We, the undersigned, owners of the real property adjacent to • 1 //` ,``,) (Street) or within (v,/k.- Cjr.•,,_ e.c---- Subdivision, hereby petition for: Street Improvements Sanitary Sewer Water Supply (Check requested items) Storm Sewer Streetlights Other (Explain) I/We understand that this petition does not in itself request the installation of these improvements, but rather, request the preparation of a feasibility report in which the estimated costs of these improvements will be tabulated. I/We understand that upon receipt of this petition and the preparation of the requested feasibility report, a public hearing will be held at which time we may voice our support or opposition based on the costs as prepared in said feasibility report. Signatur,' of Land 0 . er Address of Property / 4 2. a ../A•i� `7/0 G V in c !e[ Ii 4 ,.1 ,, j A )0'\ 0'16..= 11, CCZ- i&, . //�5. r74 ,-"( < 3>' /2/(9 %x' . 6. 01W-1 (, 4_U4 -6o (fOial 11'CcL I r(u 9 g w ',.:)(.r, „ (-7/6 )..2 (12,ca T& 10 ,,/ 961'11 rives -i ' \0 \ - FOR CITY USE ONLY Petition f 654 Date Received R. CEIVED4PR 2 9 1993 Presented to Council 3--4,- PETITION LOCATION/SUBDIVISION C 614R G KC 4,'E Ho, S I/S7e, the undersigned, owners of the real property adjacent to • I (Street) or within G A G fa K G f at. r No , G---- Subdivision, hereby petition for: Street Improvements • Sanitary Sewer Water Supply (Check requested items) Storm Sewer ` / Streetlights Y Other (Explain) I/..e understand that this petition does not in itself request the installation of these improvements , but rather, request the preparation of a 'feasibility report in which the estimated costs of these improvements will be tabulated. I/We understand that upon receipt of this petition and the preparation of the requested feasibility report, a public hearing will be held at which time we may voice our support or opposition based on the costs as prepared in said feasibility report. S _n_rure of L d e er Add s • P • •er • 2. J .dl ' I'� c ..I A L101��I • .�A.. . , - 3. -._. =" ' /j 1—/ I - ,,/ A "S'c at, L. 8. 4• IOLA'_.a ....... •ir -' -1. - 6 . I O • 9 • i / „ w I c •_ _ air _g9_5:c /i /, , Ar FOR CITY USE ONLY Petition f 65ECtwFp Date Received - �PR 2 9 1993 Presented to Council 9j PETITION IDCATION/SUEDIVISION C Fb/liz 6 Jac 1,,e N o, 5— 1/We, the undersigned, owners of the real property adjacent to • (Street) or within G D,A/ 6 f 0 L N o , ,S-- Subdivision, hereby petition for: Street Improvements Sanitary Sewer Water Supply (Check requested items) Storm Sewer Streetlights Other (Explain) I/We understand that this petition does not in itself request the installation of these improvements , but rather, request the preparation of a ' feasibility report in which the estimated costs of these improvements will be tabulated. I/We understand that upon receipt of this petition and the preparation of the requested feasibility report, a public hearing will be held at which time we may voice our support or opposition based on the costs as prepared in said feasibility report . Signature of L::. Ow1er % Address of Prove tv' :'-&-, //—/- — ' 3 92- / c 2. NI'Ibi ,, IV • oll ! RI-- 64 _ o.' . 1 '/3. it gr? arld (, ..,A .4 iL. 3?: ?8 AK/ 1 -44 4. 1,4%4, r ` Ls-.4 i . 4 U J J'_'I ii..,'' '5 . f w q l) t. 1e.3-� Aw►•Q.t .c j /r— 6 le' • - /ifilial .. / e,r ..., ___zz--; ‘,I,..., _,. 7..)c , ,� . •. vr /�,.�- I i, k,.. a ►►►nj ,'T , (J 41 0573) Ain urp �. FOR CITY USE ONLY Petition 0 C,S4 Date Received RECEIVED eca 2 9 1933 Presented to Council S- 4 -93 PETITION LOCATION/SUBDIVISION C EL)AR 6 /retie H °, I/Le, the undersigned, owners of the real property adjacent to • (Street) or within C. D,4/€ G AO L i N o , Subdivision, hereby petition for: Street Improvements Sanitary Sewer Water Supply (Check requested items) Storm Sewer ` / Streetlights Y Other (Explain) • I/We understand that this petition does not in itself request the installation of these improvements , but rather, request the preparation of a 'feasibility report in which the estimated costs of these improvements will be tabulated. I/We understand that upon receipt of this petition and the preparation of the requested feasibility report, a public hearing will be held at which time we may voice our support or opposition based on the costs as prepared in said feasibility report. _nat re of d • er Address of Property AMPIPAI 1 . L 72 2. ;ille - / A, As? " . .. _ _ 3. f d ii.. 0 - a. f Mgr qL "0 %/"�' _ ,d A5. . /.. ' .t iy rif 404Pli.11711 . .,..........--A _ 4.- a , IC •. .._!.... 11 ' ! - . . . ■ - FOR CITY USE ONLY Petition fl '54 4 Date Received RECEIVED APR 2 9 1933 Presented to Council S.- T -QJ PETITION LOCATION/SUBDIVISION e f_UPIZ G Kr U E Ho, I/We, the undersigned, owners of the real property adjacent to (Street) or within G D,A G go c- r N o , Subdivision, hereby petition for: Street Improvements Sanitary Sewer Water Supply (Check requested items) Storm Sewer ` / Streetlights v Other (Explain) l, e understand that this petition does not in itself request the installation of these improvements , but rather, request the preparation of a -feasibility report in which the estimated costs of these improvements will be tabulated. I/W'e understand that upon receipt of this petition and the preparation of the requested feasibility report, a public hearing will be held at which time we may voice our support or opposition based on the costs as prepared in said feasibility report. Signature of Land Owner Address of Property 2 - // (-// ' ( _ 3. C-:-.-y-di,./Y-A..,( -' .iL- ' 4-7,j/)-z,/ri / ,c:33 I L4 yl w 0 1 5-__e )-- - 4. \ ..,E:v" //v l<I�'L"�...`i ( O 3.` ! -,- 5 L" • S ` � �`t . � � cr > 2() 6. /,7/ 11 `ice J \ .1 40 L A...._ . . 9', c � . /� t'' , 1° <- . i � a a '/J 3 Air FOR CITY USE ONLY Petition 0 (ps� 2 /$3D Date Received f G2� IVED rR 29 19i3 Presented to Council s- 4. PETITION LOCATION/SUBDIVISION C f 1 i G X c ci t fl o, 5 I/W'e, the undersigned, owners of the real property adjacent to (Street) or wi thin C, Dp R 6 PO (- 6 N o , S--- Subdivision, hereby petition for: Street Improvements • Sanitary Sewer Water Supply (Check requested items) Storm Sewer Streetlights Other (Explain) I /'.:e understand that this petition does not in itself request the installation of these improvements, but rather, request the preparation of ar feasibility report in which the estimated costs of these improvements will be tabulated. I/We understand that upon receipt of this petition and the preparation of the requested feasibility report, a public hearing will be held at which time we may voice our support or opposition based on the costs as prepared in said feasibility report. Signature of L.:nd Ovner Address of Property 1 . NON e N- N o u- I q .-2 sA R1Ue-2- r WE 2. . 4_ J 4 illii IL.A.. ..If iii- . . L.4 3. , L., / .4011PArir • 0 _14 41 4. - --' // _ .. .. s. P( i 94- 9eNVA IV,4''w ) q - li CARNtJ /AN .-AP a 7i , ; e_ii./Lz-J / / (?/6' C 4,x ,< r - v <= - .9. �u--'- u" °�a/ / G i -c� , 9., Vf\. .,c VI— -4/)//,g /1 --.1_;&-s :/GI---F J \Cpc . 1 FOR CITY USE ONLY Petition f g S4 Date Received r' Presented to Cotilf�M _ 3 2 9 1993 PETITION LOCATION/SUBDIVISION C EUhr 6 ,rr (.'E No, 1/We, the undersigned, owners of the real property adjacent to • (Street) or within C DP J G go c- 6 No , .S--- Subdivision, hereby petition for: Street Improvements Sanitary Sewer Water Supply (Check requested items) Storm Sewer Streetlights Y Other (Explain) I/We understand that this petition does not in itself request the installation of these improvements , but rather, request the preparation of a 'feasibility report in which the estimated costs of these improvements will be tabulated. I/W'e understand that upon receipt of this petition and the preparation of the requested feasibility report, a public hearing will be held at which time we may voice our support or opposition based on the costs as prepared in said feasibility report. Signa re of land Owner Address of Property 1 I A,1 L. 1 . A. r ALAI* • • • 2 Iii/ �.._ 11,.. 11_. 1' ' i /IA! 6 i / (4--__.; 3. i‘;: -/' / ,, -.C' 447 ()/, v/ ,e PR E r) 5 -rte 0 ai- e P) , `- . C2. .' 1 +) �C"4-7 Oh'0.).4 9 Dr, 1�ya � ' 1, :.!.i, �1. _A4 o...4a . i OA IC , \iC) . FOR CITY USE ONLY Petition # (p s Date Received ECtivEn Apk 2 8 1 a Presented to Council 5- 4-91 PETITION LOCATION/SUBDIVISION I/We, the undersigned, owners of the real property adjacent to • (Street) or within C{ k#Y &rove 5 Subdivision, hereby petition for: Street Improvements Sanitary Sewer Water Supply (Check requested items) Storm Sewer Streetlights Other (Explain) I/We understand that this petition does not in itself request the installation of these improvements, but rather, request the preparation of a feasibility report in which the estimated costs of these improvements will be tabulated. I/WE 1.:nderstand that upon receipt of this petition and the preparation of the requested feasibility report, a public hearing will be held at which time we may voice our support or opposition based on the costs as prepared in said feasibility report. Signature of Land Owner Address of Property 2 ( 17 o l/-aj 2. ` . ,L.o ....?9;7a- )7 -4_, 7/{-4 3. 3 9/ 9 9''- .e, 4. ''i ► QI 1 <<, j 1 5. /J► 3 / / 7 1 ( /4- ' N i L 6_ A, 2) 7O i 1,4 C 1?,A end ((C /3/N; A /-41 1Th 611;0r n�^►.� _ 13 �rc Lazo G lv1,0t nor Ct; • 0-% TO* CI USE ONLY Petition # ..5-- Date Received nay I . -,r, Presented to Council - - _ - ' Q PETITION IDCATION/SUBDIVZSIO N 5r y-1\_ Ro 0 ek . I/We, the undersigned, owners of the real property adjacent to • (Street) or within (1 dior -Irty‘i Qi Subdivision, hereby petition for: Street Improvements Sanitary Sewer Water Supply (Check requested items) Storm Sewer Streetlights Other (Explain) I/We understand that this petition does not in itself request the installation of these improvements, but rather, request the preparation of a feasibility report in which the estimated costs of these improvements will be tabulated. I/We understand that upon receipt of this petition and the preparation of the requested feasibility report, a public hearing will be held at which time we may voice our support or opposition based on the costs as prepared in said feasibility report. • Signature of Land Owner Address of Property l'/4-■e/L72 , 1 ,,r L1 /7 ' . 2. Ca .f e--4,01-K.1-..- /O 53 i ,. 3. F � ,i -c 4- , : 4/ e3 ,d e P,,4 ` s. . ! L-It5g' /77/ a _ oc 6. 2_y .C1/9 I `1 nom- J Al i1. .. 0 /S/rt �• - /o h:' - .IRIS • / • b Ati I \Cil C\ . FOR CITY USE ONLY Petition f 2 �g Date Received Presented to Council, 5– 4._43 PETITION LOCATION/SUBDIVISION Cr-1R G X N o, 5 I/We, the undersigned, owners of the real property adjacent to • • (Street) or within G EDA,K G g0 t- r No , ..-- Subdivision, hereby petition for: Street Improvements Sanitary Sewer Water Supply (Check requested items) Storm Sewer • Streetlights V Other (Explain) I/We understand that this petition does not in itself request the installation of these improvements, but rather, request the preparation of a ' feasibility report in which the estimated costs of these improvements will be tabulated. I/We understand that upon receipt of this petition and the preparation of the requested feasibility report, a public hearing will be held at which time we may voice our support or opposition based on the costs as prepared in said feasibility report. Signature of Lend Owner Address of Propel, 1. /. . '/ %'■■ A 7 L // X75-. .,..".e.i E.; .--4' , 2.7 1J ,ff-s3 14 3. �/ �`t `%S /1/lll�r ' 5�1 „ef.` 4. —rm a/iLl Ptn4-612/ 396 ,e_ _41,6 Jed 5,..--A(---77(7(s- 26_,-,H e,-6 7e., 3_952. 6e/e_fre Pie_ . 1 ,, 6. w C?-ch Ar . f&r 1 Qc 7 -.,s<a _ •P : , ,-; 4 ,_ ,e ry ' i. (:/.... ,, t`=C_1 9. • 0 • _3 917 '. fZ Rp , FOR CITY USE ONLY Petition f 435-4 Date Received 9 f3 Presented to Covnc S_ I _ 3 PETITION LOCATION/SUBDIVISION C EL J 6 K e L'E Ho, I/We, the undersigned, owners of the real property adjacent to (Street) or within G E g G , 'O G i No , Subdivision, hereby petition for: Street Improvements Sanitary Sewer Water Supply (Check requested items) Storm Sewer ` / Streetlights Y Other (Explain) I/1e understand that this petition does not in itself request the installation of these improvements , but rather, request the preparation of a feasibility report in which the estimated costs of these improvements will be tabulated. I/'»e understand that upon receipt of this petition and the preparation of the requested feasibility report, a public hearing will be held at which time we may voice our support or opposition based on the costs as prepared in said feasibility report. SiEnature of Land Owner Address of Property 1 . a, _ 2. /A" f�/7�6 ci, A(�4a�- 3. 1,0-12,11. n n °t r 5. 6. 7 E. lc 111•■1111111111■ - - ----- - co li "0 cr, c 4., : .__., - CC 03 01 CI —t. V AI • • III Si III II II • frill 11 • • •-rolll p 10131 I g gi SO6 i a CINNIBAR RIVE ma -00..- -- • \ \ - a a -1- ---- \ ' - ii*-la--,, \ ` -.--"A _ CU 0060. \ \ --c‘--\ , _ I crr6i Z4riit i.. . ZU;ii L Cef ....., 905 , \ ill ----1 \ \ \_ _ _ • _ LA 1 Ilil--- _tot,. , .... El-- ts • \ I ..._. _ cimoNiTE_____ _ , 1 ,, _.....- — c ------- - 44 6i5Z 'K 1 --▪ --Stsi Va7 ... .r) - - -\ __ .,4 --..-1Y---\--- 1 _ - ...._. I_LI W) I Of6 —Li-..._ , r 1 12__ -----(111 J ,..15,32' 2 e c' 9c6C L,,...4J ri / I li o F C ra,' 1 . _i444.. CI. Z c‘. , <1,9 4i-t6i4 LC) 11 cr:. - ''tf' •7 81,6i' ■.44. 1,..4 0 • , ,, (..) ci 64- I -I 1-- 0 • , ,,,AlcE st A ct 'VI P96i'm Z Li, < Z 111 i •'' ), S.-tg (5- (5r' • Q. S • —j 0 —J 096i.II — — L-k-i N -T, vb49 igto,ifli 996i t(7 331611c1 ' ct 1 • ..---,,,, ,, I11,11:11 Z4 a --/J . 117,1 Wiltig40k iti aka a 006i ' LI V W 00 /NM * 4., cl) . 9. op o v. • 41 wad Lij _ 0 3 ‘ri 5Gla - t —4 CC o, 0, .-- '■ cf.,,--- .. I-- . $." _cli a. • 0 ()"• 4.I a cn t VI 4.J 311^ # '\C31' 405 416'4. . ('• 5*:1). Z ila E lion . • VI Q.+ ..1 J. --' '5' • > cu 1:, Z 5 CI . LtEr i cc i.., , 0 i; *1151 —2 't Itt 8 8 r8 arsJ i . , it ,.. . ... -. rt 4. g '* 111111 -115 al rrN, LIU ca Cri6i - rn v. GYOd d38 Iv ci,• . C as z W -11-11-111 ZS64 1:1- 1—, = 03 D cc cc < o, ••••• a 9964 a ' • .......:::: • 14 0 ., . \-- .4:‘,vi riTa 1 . ... Delat • \\t ----- Agenda Information Memo May 4, 1993 City Council Meeting BUR OAK HILLS 3RD ADDITION FINAL PLAT U. Final Plat, Bur Oak Hills 3rd Addition--The applicant and City staff are in the process of completing final plat documents for the above-referenced subdivision. If all items are executed in time for Tuesday's meeting, this item will be in order for approval by the Council. If not, staff will recommend that it be pulled at the time of agenda adoptio . A copy of the plat as it appears for recording with the County is enclosed on page 1 N for your review. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the final plat for Bur Oaks 3rd Addition as presented. _ 1�3 F 1. 1. "I, it::}j 1 1-I. @ _ - v I ► Iilj —` ■ ', I I _I{ -i — — — —403 N1- _ 71` /• i Lat L n /r .e. `Y i ..•1. � �.� m:,) .' ' . fir• ' •: .e w ' / ") ' - !: , - L. — __ 11711.— _ ypp ��/ CND WI.1 t ?C:1 = 1 —6----"--7-7- --� / b fi j I' I I I it WI :' f i I � ►� j t! y •! { ( 11 j I f ICI �I f e :i ! !I '�• • li 1 j = III- fI 't 1 •• i s i; - r Ij ! i 1 11 lift It 1 11:41 < Ii i i i t 11 ,i1 It l t 13 1 1 i � .} i1_I 1 1 , i 1 I �i 1 i•i! It iii !i I . • t i1 ( I 1l 1'' i1 II` ' .I - t I I I' i', t 11 s _e li 1 i 1 I �1 Ii0 I • Y• g tj t i If II 11 fit1 • Ii I t I1 r 1111 :t I t :1. t=1 i • ` I j i 1 ti ili 1 III I t - t 1 ! 1 f �� jI i, o E j 1 I •, II III I'j •f ,i i1 1 (' (! f; E s r I. �_� Ij s it' i 1 1 ` 1 • I' I t EI I.' I I I 01 11 I 1 III j �I 1 ' iii Iii ' Ii Iii I • �i i ill ti, ( [ I I, ( 1 E f II , !l 'ii I., 1� jr i t•1� 1 i t 1 1 I 11 !� 1 1 I; 11 j i fl it I ;I 1( 1 fl 1 • -- \ 4 .. ..._ ___. _ Agenda Information Memo May 4, 1993 City Council Meeting ENGSTROMS DEERWOOD 2ND ADDITION FINAL PLAT V. Final Plat, Engstroms Deerwood 2nd Addition--The applicant and City staff are in the process of completing final plat documents for the above-referenced subdivision. If all items are executed in time for Tuesday's meeting, this item will be in order for approval by the Council. If not, staff will recommend that it be pulled at the time of agenda adoption. A copy of the plat as it appears for recording with the County is enclosed on page 1( (e for your review. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the final plat for Engstroms Deerwood 2nd Addition as presented. 7c I ^,,jag r=_,_ �Ei s ..._ aD_:r,L•N �T'Iy� ; >t El / I f= -1 o+& w..0o..r.r • N Q293.59 W I L 29569 C ' —s -ter== L — ---{� N. . \ + ., \ YA_/.:.U.10—i , `) 1 • I iiiii a \,`-4 4 .rte _ --11 1 ta t "' `\N‘‘.'`i \ co , II .1i a=�� [a 3 'A.,, I In Ee ill o n L:, \� C \� i l' a811 11 R;I >i ` , —\r rt.x p 1 2 I .. \` + \ I,�e �7 \- k \° ` P Ig± �' ,--. \ 4 \ c'' I 140 I E e E, 1.4'. f1 "_Alarmarz_1�'—I z 3 _ ! a £ i£ i !{ iii £.> % \t,/ .,,�/awl `.I^ � rn , ,, i ai CZ) P.'r _a,t1 "';;?_ \ 6�\ \ 7C Q CLIPPER o @ °S -S33 £ \\ \4 e s I I f. i YF °bY ;_. ��, i n � ' i i iii .1 E-t z t..$2 � \ 1 '^ .Inj towns ` 1 i ; d ;s. ;7. u\,x Al,,,,,\ iE o0 it. £ R. \ s^- ;C ? E i £ £. ii• '• .• fI z I``61 S I it• i . J li "ice :1 3 , � (61 `s i !c LLA i. ,n 0` n Wall L°�a K t b .0 LIZ L..7O.. MO, N 'y I ' O cg i € � ; r 11 s . £ R.� s;1[I t FIT- a , E i 5, A £ Er}n r -.. ry,l S i «P s ii II 1 ill Y, li ; 0 iY? ill rtit>� • i .i � £i i 1 3 FYIggqi• ; >i 'I i _ �` yt 4 ! c e t i. £! 1 1I i iI Xv i . i I. > Fi 1 IllEi I i i . Ii r. i; 111111£ F t f'! p9 s 5, LI i 2 ig:3 ig s' t, t c'2 . at E tzt3S>;I I .1 (. (..q Agenda Information Memo May 4, 1993, City Council Meeting . .. ..... ..... .... .... . . ...... ... PUBLIC HEARINGS LEXINGTON AVE & LONE OAK RD (INTERSECTIONJSIGNALIZATIONIMPROVEMENTS) A. Project 601A (Amended), Lexington Avenue & Lone Oak Road(Intersection/Signalization Improvements)--On March 16, 1993, the City Council received the amended feasibility report for Project 601A which provides for the intersection and signalization improvements for the intersection of Lexington Avenue (County Road 43) and Lone Oak Road (County Road 26). Enclosed on pages through N9is a copy of this feasibility report for the Council's reference during thi public hearing. This project has a history that dates back to the late 1980's when the City and County were preparing 5-year CIP's. While this intersection and Lone Oak Road from I-35E to TH 149/55 were originally proposed to be improved in 1991 under both the City and the County's 5-year CIP's, the City Council requested that Diffley Road (County Road 30)which was originally scheduled for 1994 be accelerated and that Lone Oak Road be delayed in its place. However, recognizing the traffic volumes and problems associated with the intersection, the County requested that the intersection/signalization improvements remain on schedule for 1991./ Enclosed on pag�'y�+%�s"a schedule of the various significant meetings associated with the progression of this impr vement bringing. it to its fifth public hearing scheduled for May 4. Enclosed on pages � 7G through / Z is a written list of safety issues as raised by representatives of Crate Pros ects and the County Traffic Engineer's response. Enclosed on pages /S___3 through /(p3are various letters received from individuals and companies who use this intersection. Enclosed on pages LC/ `t" through J4 is a summary report prepared by the County's Traffic Engineer presenting the justificatio for the design and scope of the project being proposed. Enclosed on pages (t ind (D' is a letter from the City's consulting engineer showing a cost analysis between thi‘ proposed improvement with the intersection improvements currently under construction at Lexington Avenue and Diffley Road. The slight difference in costs can be attributed to the increased amount of utilities and trailway combined with adjusting for the financial benefit of including an intersection improvement with an entire County road improvement program (i.e., economics of scale). Because of the complexities of right-of-way acquisition appraisals and condemnation procedures associated with different zoned properties, it is difficult to prepare an accurate cost estimate for the 79,300 sq.ft. of property at Lexington and Lone Oak. The Lexington/Diffley intersection required 58,000 sq.ft. of acquisition. If the average $1.00 /sq.ft. is applied to Project 601A, the cost estimate is further reduced by $120,000. ) \ 1 Agenda Information Memo May 4, 1993, City Council Meeting (Project 601A Cont'd.) The following is a 5-year history of accidents recorded at this intersection: Accident Type 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 As of 4-29-93 TOTAL Property Damage * * * 7 10 2 Personal Injury * * * 1 3 0 TOTAL 6 9 4 8 13 2 42 * Breakdown not available. This intersection has also witnessed significant increases in traffic volumes as identified by the following average daily traffic (ADT) counts: (Note: The total volume through this intersection is arrived at by dividing the sum of traffic from each leg by two.) Year North Leg East Leg South Leg West Leg INTERSECTION TOTAL 1980 6,000 3,800 4,800 2,600 8,600 1990 . 7,600 8,000 11,000 15,200 21,000 1992 7,800 10,500 12,000 18,000 24,000 2010 Forecast 13,100 17,600 21,600 27,100 40,000 Presently, this intersection is one of the busiest 4-way stops in Dakota County. The project that is being presented at this public hearing is not available for any design modifications as previously addressed. The project to be considered should either be approved as presented or denied. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To close the public hearing and approve/deny Project 601A (Amended) for the intersection/signalization of Lexington Avenue and Lone Oak Road and, if approved, authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute all related cooperative agreements with Dakota County. '" l LEXINGTON AVENUE & LONE OAK ROAD INTERSECTION/SIGNALIZATION IMPROVEMENT MEETINGS Date City Meeting Action Project # 7-2-91 601 Public Hearing Based on requests for additional information,the public hearing was continued to 7-16. 7-11-91 601 Neighborhood Info. Presented details of project to interested/affected property owners. 7-16-91 601 Public Hearing Approved project with condition that County modify medians. 7-30-91 601 County Physical Dev. Board Cmte. Reviewed City's request for design modification with affected/interested property owners and their attorneys. 8-6-91 601 County Board Denied City's request to modify median design. 8-6-91 601 Regular Council Cancelled intersection improvement based on County's position. 10-20-92 601R Regular Council Council takes action to schedule another public hearing to reconsider intersection improvements along with upgrading of Lone Oak Road to TH 149/55. 11-10-92 601R Neighborhood Meeting Met with affected/interested property owners to review expanded/revised project scope. 11-17-92 601R Public Hearing Denied Lone Oak Road upgrading and continued consideration of intersection signalization for 60 days. 1-6-93 601A Neighorhood Meeting Reviewed alternate intersection design (shortened median - north leg) with affected/interested property owners. 1,4CL EAGANDALE CENTER S L INDUSTRIAL PARK No. 9 Y L. 0 Ii o il °' 1 1 ® 1 c 11. r_- 051-77 030-:77 020-77 010-77 2 96.98' 300.02' 272.71 ' £4 2' 101 .5 ' 45 ilfj1 * POND CREDIT i\\\�\\\\\\\\\\\\� L- v. 2 10 - 15 _ _ r 60' d' 30' 261 .40''----' 100' 100' 250' , 1,I 265' 151-60 152-t-: 010-26 010-25 1 2 *75' C.L.C. I p75' C.L.C. EAGANDALE CENTER Q 3 INDUSTRIAL PARK No. 3 0 1 00 200 —1•■•• *75' C.L.C. =CORNER LOT CREDIT faa Scale fn feet C.R. 43(LEXINGTON AVENUE) EAGANDALE EAGANDALE CENTER BELL CENTER PARK No. 10 LEXINGTON ADDITION PARK No. 2 0 050-77 1 2 « � lu ' 1 2 ' 1 3 010-50 13 T -' . I � ,I 20"' 14 '•5 , 3i.33 170 �1 _ ,I ,_:?=_e_:••A_��►*!i 4!. &i'! .. i!!i!i!i!i!il l:.: 90 95 - - - 100 145 EAGANDALE 1 Q 100' 24 0' 100' 0106)0' 100' 8 9 10 CENTER Q ° EAGANDALE CENTER PARK No. 9 X INDUSTRIAL PARK No. 3 J N W Bituminous Overlay Rate ($10.56/FF) = Overlay & Concrete Curb ($25.41 /FF) 0 1 00 2ao .:•: :•:Y. Reconstruct Rate ($108.25) Scole in feet STREET ASSESSMENTS ii, Bonestroo Rosene Anderiikdi EAGAN, MINNESOTA (, FI URE 6 Associates LEXINGTON AVE. (C.R. 43) Engineers& Architects LONE OAK RD. (C.S.A.H. 26 NO. 601A Amendment 2335 west Highway 36 49\49525\49525F99 JANUARY 1993 COMM. 49525 St. Paul, Minnesota 55113 e o ` O Y O u �� c m v om oocm FII m¢Q¢ apJ!O fop auol J I 1 ? ° 4GP--- --- V u O al 1 q r-' a N o Z Z W 11 19 (7) cc m c•.■ 0 /1 Z I1 Iil •� I z I I i � 1 a (ainj) m — — PMB 61uo�;suuy 1!&N r�i i -� o Ln f pg w n 6ualsuy !!aN z 1 J f N C cr i 11 I 1 I 1 Lai j ' n a 1 1 z z° _ a 1 CC o I I rJ a E c 0 ,,,sr ' I I ct z° Pil 7 1 c o t I ^J W c 0 W 11tH "o it Z c ' t 1 6 a N Jr W n as CG _ I \ O U O-J r, I' �1. O4 J 0 �d o Z O i N W , ` T i W o •o °m ° Y`m\ .- u _ 7�--- C O O G m CO Q Q Q W+ag 'inn HIIYII M S 41GP r l o z D "L Q r 'I 1 r_ o_ ci Q O II ; 1 '-. o ■ 1 I I VV) t.X Z ix z Z ® o o I k ____ L--__, c.) D Wi�z,.,, 0 C- L Z L.,.1 to m I n Q l] t. - - ----- - any uo16u xa1 �L'l II l { 9 ,, ��N\V1 1 L - 1 Itl' /r 0 1 I 1 i 1 1 1 li i 'I { ;I I 1I I i 1 I .I z ...'////-- i• ce //r / I LC r// I !I 11 �" IHi o z o cm 1i H' L 0 0 I 1F". Z s ' ,1 W U A 0 1 � I- p w � z,o z I I i' o Q0 .....4_1- - z W 1 , i f— I �! ,o uo,�H 3 g ^ h III , V/ a . I1 I I - Lo 1 , j m U c°., Co LI CL N CL to J 2 I I 1 I I- < 1 O (a N I. 'I I II 1i 4J O4 h 1 II F [1 Z Z U-1 I i I JH 0 A 6 O J ic ,, L' I Z I , 1 ii l I I u Z:::=u o Z !° N M � 0 o - x —. z 1 cc D 1 ki, ' LC o `li L_ I j I _ I ‘, 0 _ a, T- - �.w..0 1 ■ pooh )1Dp ouor�� : �� _ — 1 i! lI ii I j I 0 E 11 ; 1 1 u •`a /- BIN 0 Z h /7-M7'// i t , .... 7 T a e • z \1 I I o .p rw.gn10 •'^ • I 'y i T M Z , —'—--- ,___O-71' -t k lII S < o 2 o s E2 z t II z Q z It'-I L7 w . il ILLIS: I Q 1 ki ,1 APPENDIX B PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL LONE OAK ROAD (DAKOTA CSAH 26) RECONSTRUCTION PROJECT 601A-Amendment ASSESSMENTS PARCEL ASSESSABLE RATE LONE OAK LEXINGTON SERVICES TOTAL FOOTAGE PER FF ROAD AVENUE ASSESSMENT Section 2 (SW 3/4) Parcel 010.50 170 108.25 18,402.50 3,790.00 22,192.50 Bell Lexington Addn. Lot 1, Block 1 (1) 265 (2) 25.41 6,733.65 Lot 1, Block 1 200 108.25 21,650.00 (3) 28,383.65 Lot 2, Block 1 140.95 108.25 15,257.84 15,257.84 Lot 3, Block 1 131.33 108.25 14,216.47 14,216.47 Eagandale Center Industrial Park No. 2 Parcel 151.00 260 12) 25.41 6,606.60 6,606.60 Parcel 15200 10 (2) 25.41 254.10 254.10 Section 3 (SE 1) Parcel 010-77 45 121 25.41 1,143.45 1,143.45 Parcel 020.77 101.59 (21 25.41 2,581.40 2,581.40 Parcel 03077 112 12) 25.41 2,845.92 2,845.92 Parcel 051-77 272.71 121 25.41 6,929.56 6,929.56 Section 10 (NE 3/4) Eagandale Center Industrial Park No. 9 Lot 1, Block 2 300.02 10.56 3,168.21 3,168.21 Lot 2, Block 2 96.98 10.56 1,024.11 1,024.11 Section 11 (NW 3/4) Parcel 01025 261.14 10.56 2,757.64 2,757.64 Parcel 01026 30 10.56 316.80 316.80 Eagandale Center Industrial Park No. 3 Lot 1, Block 5 100 10.56 1,056.00 1,056.00 Lot 2, Block 5 100 10.56 1,056.00 1,056.00 Lot 3, Block 5 (1) 250 10.56 2,640.00 Lot 3, Block 5 100 108.25 10,825.00 (4) 13,465.00 Lot 4, Block 5 210 108.25 22,732.50 22,732.50 Lot 5, Block 5 100 108.25 10,825.00 10,825.00 Lot 6, Block 5 100 108.25 10,825.00 10,825.00 Lot 7, Block 5 100 108.25 10,825.00 10,825.00 TOTAL 135,559.31 39,113.44 3,790.00 178,462.75 (1) Includes 75' Corner Lot Credit (2) Assessment Rate = Bituminous Overlay and Concrete Curb (3) Total Assessment for Lot 1, Block 1 (4) Total Assessment for Lot 3, Block 5 49525 Amend.rnnt 20 1 7-a 1 APPENDIX A ASSESSMENT RATE CALCULATION BITUMINOUS OVERLAY RATE (52' Wide Street) Rate/F.F. 0.20 Gal. Bituminous material for tack coat C' $1.50/gal. $ 0.31 0.30 Ton Bituminous wear course (a; $14.00/ton 4.20 0.02 Ton Bituminous material for mixture (a; $130.00/ton 2.60 $ 7.11 10% Contingencies .71 $ 7.82 35% Legal, Engr., Admin. & Bond Interest 2.74 TOTAL $10.56 CONCRETE CURB RATE Rate/F.F. 1 C.Y. Common excavation (a $2.00/C.Y. $ 2.00 1 L.F. Concrete curb & gutter (a $5.00/L.F. 5.00 2 S.Y. Sodding (a $1.50'S.Y. 3.00 $10.00 +5% Contingencies 1.00 $11.00 ±30Y Legal, Engr., Admin. & Bond Interest 3.85 TOTAL $14.85 49525 Amend.mnt 19 n � 3 PROJECT SCHEDULE Present Feasibility Report March 16, 1993 Public Hearing May 4, 1993 Approve Plans and Specifications Spring 1993 Open Bids/Award Contract Summer 1993 Complete Construction Fall 1993 Assessment Hearing Summer 1994 First Payment Due with Real Estate Taxes May 1995 II 49525 Arne ndmint 18 131 City of Eagan Dakota County Total Street $248,000 $302,000 $ 550,000 Traffic Signal 75,000 75,000 150,000 Bituminous Trail/Concrete walk 18,000 22,000 40,000 Storm Sewer Catch Basin & Leads 32,000 39,000 71,000 All Others 58,000 1,000 59,000 Sanitary Sewer/Water Main Adjustment 18,000 22,000 40,000 Sanitary Sewer'Water Service 3,790 --- 3,790 Right-of-way 90,000 110,000 200,000 TOTALS $542,790 $571,000 $1,113,790 Revenues from the proposed street and utility service assessments are listed below: Street $174,672 Sanitary Sewer & Water Service 3,790 TOTAL $178,462 Based on these assessments, approximately $364,000 ($542,790 - $178,462) will be required from the major street fund and trail dedication fund to cover the remaining City of Eagan share for this project. 49525'Amend.mnt 17 136 REVENUE SOURCES As previously indicated, the City of Eagan and Dakota County will enter into a cost sharing agreement for this project. Costs for right-of-way acquisition are estimated based on previous acquisitions by Dakota County. A summary of City/County cost allocations is presented in the following table: City of Eagan Dakota County (Percentage). (Percentage) Street (Grading, surfacing, utility reconstruction and restoration 45 55 Traffic Signal 50 50 Bituminous Trail!Concrete Walk Existing Lone Oak & Lexington 45 55 Lone Oak E. of Lexington N. side 0 100 Lone Oak E. of Lexington S. side 100 0 Storm Sewer Catch Basins & Catch Basin Leads 45 55 All other 100 0 Sanitary Sew er'Water Main Adjustment 45 55 Sanitary Sewer and Water Service 100 0 ROW & Construction Easements 45 55 49525 Antend.ntnt 16 J 3 ASSESSMENTS Assessments are proposed to be levied against the benefited properties in accordance with assessment policies established in the City of Eagan. A preliminary assessment roll is included in Appendix B located at the back of this report. Assessments are separated into street and sanitary sewer/water service. Sanitary sewer/water service is proposed to be assessed entirely to the benefited property they serve. Street is separated into two rate categories which are listed below: Overlay Rate (52' wide street) $ 10.56/F.F. Concrete Curb Rate $ 14.85/F.F. Street Surfacing w,/Grading & Storm Sewer Commercial/Industrial Rate $108.25/F.F. The determination of the concrete curb rate is presented in Appendix A. It's expected the overlay and curb rate will be revised based on final bid unit prices. The street surfacing rate with grading and stotlli sewer is included in the 1993 Fee Schedule for Eagan. Properties proposed to be assessed the concrete curb rate include those properties on Lexington Avenue. In addition, the properties on Lexington Avenue north of Lone Oak Road are also proposed to be assessed the concrete curb rate because concrete curb does not exist north of Lone Oak Road. Properties on Lone Oak Road east of Lexington Avenue are proposed to be assessed the full rate for street surfacing with grading and storm sewer because total street reconstruction is proposed in this area. All properties are proposed to be assessed at their highest and best use which is considered commercial/industrial. Therefore, all property is to be assessed as commercial/industrial property which reflects a 52' wide equivalent street. 49525 Arnend.mnt 15 13L M AREA TO BE INCLUDED Listed below are the parcels proposed to be assessed which also abut the project: Section 2 (SW 1/4) Parcel 010-50 Eagandale Industrial Park No. 2 Parcel 151-00 Parcel 152-00 Bell Lexington Addition Lot 1. 2. 3. Block 1 Section 3 (SE 1/4) Parcel 010-77 Parcel 020-77 Parcel 030-77 Parcel 051-77 Section 10 (NE 1/4) Eagandale Center Industrial Park No. 9 Lot 1. 2. Block 2 Section 11 (NW 1/4) Parcel 010-25 Parcel 010-26 Eagandale Center Industrial Park No. 3 Lot 1-7. Block 5 4952c Amend.mnt 14 ( 33 COST ESTIMATE The estimated cost for this project is summarized below which includes overhead costs. Other costs are estimated at 35% and include legal, engineering, and administration. However, it does not include the yet unknown costs for the easement acquisition process being performed by the County. Street $550,000 Traffic Signal 150,000 Bituminous Trail/Sidewalk 40,000 Storm Sewer 130,000 Sanitary Sewer & Water Main Adjustment 40,000 Sanitary Sewer/Water Service 3.790 TOTAL PROJECT COST $913,790 RIGHT-OF-WAY AND EASEMENT The project will require additional street right-of-way(R.O.W.). Listed below is the approximate area and additional right-of-way required for each section of road. The easement acquisition/negotiation process is administered by Dakota County. Dakota County. at this time, has not specifically identified right-of-way requirements for each parcel. Lexington Avenue north of Lone Oak Road: Additional R.O.W. West Side - Existing 1 R.O.W. = 33', Proposed = 40' 4,800 sq.ft. East Side - Existing 1, R.O.W. = 50', Proposed = 60' 5,200 sq.ft. Lexington Avenue south of Lone Oak Road: West Side - Existing % R.O.W. = 60'. Proposed = 75' 10,500 sq.ft. East Side - Existing % R.O.W. = 50', Proposed = 75' 14,400 sq.ft. East Side - Parcel 010-25 - Existing 1/2 R.O.W. = 50'. Proposed = 60' 2,600 sq. ft. Lone Oak Road east of Lexington Avenue North Side: North side - Parcel 010-50 - Existing 1/2 R.O.W. = 33', Proposed = 75' 11,300 sq.ft. South Side - Existing 1/2 R.O.W. = 50', Proposed = 75' 30.500 sq.ft. TOTAL 79,300 sq.ft. 49525 Amend•mnt 13 3 Sanitary Sewer and Water. Sanitary sewer and water main of sufficient size and capacity exist in both Lone Oak Road and Lexington Avenue. As a result, no improvements or upgrades are recommended to these systems. However, adjustment of manhole structures, gate valves and relocation of existing hydrants is required. In addition, due to the grade changes proposed in Lone Oak Road east of Lexington Avenue approximately 350' of 16" water main is proposed to be reconstructed and lowered approximately 3'. It's also proposed to extend a 6" water main and 8" sanitary sewer service to serve future development in Parcel 010-50 and Lot 13 of Eagandale Center Industrial Park No. 2 as shown on Figure No. 5. 49525 Amend.mnt 12 \ 3 Storm Sewer: Storm sewer exists in Lexington Avenue and Lone Oak Road west of Lexington Avenue. Storm sewer improvements proposed in those sections include extensions to the existing system as shown on the attached drawing. Storm sewer does not exist in Lone Oak Road east of Lexington Avenue. Therefore, it's proposed to extend a 27" diameter storm sewer westerly in Lone Oak Road from the existing 36" storm sewer in Neil Armstrong Boulevard as shown on Figure No. 4 and 5. The existing 36" storm sewer in Neil Armstrong Boulevard is limited in capacity. Therefore, in accordance with the Comprehensive Storm Sewer Plan and previously proposed as part of Project No. 601R, its P P recommended a future ponding area (Pond EP-9) be developed on the north side of Lone Oak Road between Neil Armstrong Boulevard and Lone Oak Circle. It's recommended the ponding area be developed when Lot 12 of Eagandale Center Industrial Park No. 2 develops or Lone Oak Road (C.S.A.H. 26) is upgraded west of Neil Armstrong Boulevard. In the future. the existing 27" storm sewer will be disconnected from the existing 36" storm sewer and will be redirected into the new ponding area (Pond EP-9) once its developed. Figure No. 3 shows the proposed storm sewer extensions in Lexington Avenue. 49525 Amend.mnt 11 \ 3d0 OM 7-111■ 0 n m O Y \ m G=U o m U o O O C o CO Cr Q Q 3Nfi HOlVW n ��� I �k� epn0 ,ioO auo1 J fI 41 r' Z 1 1 r_-' Y o a. 0 i �I. t < -1 1 N N Q ` W Q ; U O z r- Z O I. I t O ® N J O .tt .S�` w z w W z i III � ` fI N g 5 Ct `'- -- w -- = pI � 1 m r--, -', o J ! H 00 O W \iHL 1 m ° O ay o Z ( < —n j ■[Jr�I I — d 1 (a.n}n4) I 1 ' , •pnlg 6 u uoa}suy IeN L -.. --r — — — -- — II •pnIg 6uo4suuy IiaN o -J n_ cc C 1 tn( } Z ,L 0 Ct •t co O w p Z vl Y o, © t z° _ - Q a < ; O 0 rn Y .. Q Y O O C ce. < Z Y G r O I ' w 0: In H O w ± Y W O �y I s r CY°z Z 1, . a_ < J 2 Z o 0 U I o \N - -- z w i1 z __ L-, , O Ei Z c" ;Ow U < I = z 1 — w z O W Do U I /r fQ UO} WON N w I �I U U 1 I r I W Q U O r� Ct t0 U c O < i ` U a c$ 0 O a Z r-- I p W H I n z m n z m 3N I1 HO1VW Z i 1 N ,-6 O I I l.os oi 1 j i fill o CV 01 I 11 u • 1 : ' I # ill � ' r II Q C I o N o f z W CC 1G I- ll ?z r' 0 j o I; o a W m 1 ■ —0 , *AVM, R .r W p Z PDD�J ADO DuO1\ it 1 1.11J> z° Q : 1 , Y a Z Z a I Z CA CC I- Cl. - o r^ Z V E e z Z D J x C U z W E • `..■ CC a J v wa I l - 6 o r z £ 1 I 0 a ,5 0 1 Z W o Cl. : . o Z 0 U IH o cc w Z n rn �,.! m ro z Jp Ma nqn 0 ' n O 8 L LI Z N Z I.l J Q Z JW ■ N b Li zi, 1 \°- g tz n6J Lii Q I , 1 1 Z j 0 0 ■ BUILDING I 0 ' I' D Z gUIL X I 1 V w 14' 12 14'I'' 14' 14' 01 J 1 8' BIT TRAIL LONE OAK ROAD - EX 8' BIT TRAIL / ; //' ' 14' 14' 441111mimmim 112'2 14' 41111mimmilm � -. i __ ■■sse A ' 'nsrz 14 14' ill 14' 12' 12' __ 14' / //, // : y TR• 4 % ''C , 3 r , _ , ,,.., 4 , C.S.A.H. 26 -` . , ,,, r------ % , N Z Ste; /;1 14' 14' F; 14' 12i12' 14' N 0 25 50 Scale in feet INTERSECTION LAYOUT 6,-)D a Rosene Anderlik& EAGAN, MINNESOTA FIGURE 2 U Associates LEXINGTON AVE. (C.R. 43) & Engineers& Architects LONE OAK RD. (C.S.A.H. 26) PROJ. NO. 601A—Amendment 2335 West Highway 36 49\49525\49525F02 MARCH 1993 COMM. 49525 St. Paul, Minnesota 5511 that includes grading and storm sewer improvements. The design street width each direction from the intersection provide for four driving lanes and left turn lanes separated by a center median. An additional right turn is provided on Lone Oak Road west and east of Lexington Avenue and on Lexington Avenue south of Lone Oak Road. The design street widths at the Lone Oak Road and Lexington Avenue intersection are shown on Figure No. 2. As previously mentioned, a new traffic signal is also included. Figures No. 2A and 2B show the street improvements beyond the intersection. 49525 .Amend.nint 7 E FEASIBILITY AND RECOMMENDATION The project is feasible from an engineering standpoint and is in accordance with the Master Utility and Street Plans for the City of Eagan and Dakota County. The project as outlined herein will be administered by Dakota County. The City of Eagan will be required to enter into a cost sharing agreement with Dakota County similar to past agreements. DISCUSSION Street: The proposed street improvements include widening and reconstructing Lexington Avenue and Lone Oak Road approximately 700' in each direction from their intersection. Lexington Avenue north and south of Lone Oak Road presently exists as a 4 lane roadway with concrete curb to the south and bituminous curb to the north. Lone Oak Road west of Lexington Avenue exists as a 5 lane roadway with concrete curb and was upgraded as part of the construction of I-35E. Lone Oak Road east of Lexington Avenue exists as a two lane rural section roadway. A four way stop sign presently exists at the intersection. The specific improvements for Lexington Avenue and Lone Oak Road west of Lexington Avenue include removal of existing concrete and bituminous curbs and constructing new concrete curbs to accommodate the design street width. The existing street section will be maintained and the area between the new concrete curb and existing street section will be constructed with bituminous. The center medians will be constructed on the existing street surface. Once the new concrete curbs, center medians, and bituminous patching is complete. the entire street surface will be overlaid with a 1-1/2" thick 2341 Bituminous Wear Course. The street improvements proposed for Lone Oak Road east of Lexington Avenue include complete reconstruction to a 4 lane divided urban section 49525 Amendh nt 6 �.s 0905747 MW NO 494 16. ...,---' C 6 11111 11111 I -01 ax CEMIW RD 3R0 ALY! ,"•' 15 010-05 * ., 27 26 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 38 ll Z Moo 132-02 ,0 9 8 7 8 5 av 3 A 1 r4FA11111 14 60 11 liff:44S. *'I � as e` ; O w •o a �.�zs_„.o©coal g mtrir m17eNii 0741* im■ A ............. 11010 46(10.1, mmid00 1 I 1 I Wirt, o mldG�`d"0©DD oe6 00 050-CO 171 04 ` e` Ell= mar / --.. misih 31= 161-04 i "0-7 PROJECT 12 lir LOCATION 15 " ; 1E. 9 , 3 24 9 LONE OAK RD 3 8 7 6 0 10 11 1213 6'#5 010-03 0 A.,= 010-25 v ,.P�p 14 6' ' 15 04 }p 3132 34 1-03 AgXLO!d7 010-28 e it 8 ZJ 7 l I I , 6 2 0 e _ Q zo �� 21 3 037-08 _ if 010-06 0 ' '•� 26292423 22 v ‘'" 010-05 =IN 8010 4 'Z 072-04 JZ � W 2345 081-C4 10 N 5 010-57 ' 3 2 1 2 , r 2 • ill( 2 010-50 0 t000 2000 iiiWTGTTG 010-7e m 3 ® 4 Scale in feet LOCATION PLAN n Rose n. . Anderliket EAGAN, MINNESOTA IGURE 1 Associates LEXINGTON AVE. (C.R. 43) & EnginssrsQ Architects LONE OAK RD. (C.S.A.H. 26) PROJECT NO. 601A—Amendment 2335 wear Highway 3Q 49\49525\49525701 DECEMBER 1992 COMM. 49516 St. Paul, Minnesota 55113 Project 601R provided for improvements not only to the intersection of Lone Oak Road/Lexington Avenue, but also upgrading Lone Oak Road to TH 55 and approximately 600 feet to the east. The basic differences between Project 601, 601A and 601A- Amendment are associated with the following items: - The length of center median in Lexington Avenue north of Lone Oak Road. The full length center median restricted access to the first four properties while the shorter median did not. - Whether to construct the bituminous trail along the west side of Lexington Avenue north of Lone Oak Road. - Whether to construct the right turn lane in Lone Oak Road for west bound traffic wanting to turn north onto Lexington Avenue. Listed below is how each item was proposed to be constructed as part of those projects: Project Project Project 601A- 601 601A Amendment Center Median Lexington Avenue full length short full length (north of Lone Oak Road) (300') (70') (270') Construct bituminous trail west side Lexington Avenue (north of Lone Oak Road) yes no no Construct right turn lane for west bound traffic on Lone Oak Road no yes yes Project 601R was similar to the previous projects, however it obviously was much larger. A few of the issues discussed at the public hearing for Project 601R but not previously discussed at the public hearings for projects 601, 601A, and 601A-Amendment are listed below: - Whether concrete center medians the entire length of Lone Oak Road from Lexington Avenue to T.H. 55 are justified. - Removal of the railroad bridge and construction of an at-grade crossing. - Dart Transfer Corp. driveway access onto Lone Oak Road. - The alignment of Lone Oak Road in the vicinity of Dart Transfer Corp. - The cost of the project, the cost for right-of-way acquisition, and the proposed assessments to the benefitted property. 49525,'Amend.mnt 4 SCOPE: This project provides for the reconstruction of the intersection at Lexington Avenue (C.R. 43) and Lone Oak Road (C.S.A.H. 26) which includes the installation of a traffic signal (Figure No. 1). The existing utilities will be reconstructed and upgraded as required. The intersection improvements are proposed at this time due to the existing traffic volumes and turning movements resulting at this intersection. The existing traffic volume meets warrants for a traffic signal. Listed below are the 1988 average daily traffic volumes (ADT) as determined by Dakota County and the projected traffic volumes for the year 2010. 1993 ADT 2013 ADT Lone Oak Road (C.S.A.H. 26) West of Lexington Avenue 18,900 37,800 East of Lexington Avenue 13,300 26,600 Lexington Avenue (C.R. 43) South of Lone Oak Road 13,300 26,600 North of Lone Oak Road 8,400 16,800 PROJECT HISTORYBACKGROUND The project proposed herein has been discussed numerous times at informational and public hearings since 1991. The associated project numbers and times are listed below: Hearing Date Hearing Result Project 601 July 1991 Not approved Project 601R November 1992 Not approved Project 601A January 1993 Not approved Project 601A-Amendment May 1993 Pending In summary, Project 601, 601A. and 601A-Amendment provided for only improvements to the intersection of Lone Oak Road/Lexington Avenue including the traffic signal. 49525 Arnend.mnt 3 LEXINGTON AVENUE (C.R. 43) & LONE OAK ROAD (C.S.A.H. 26) INTERSECTION RECONSTRUCTION/SIGNALIZATION EAGAN, MINNESOTA PROJECT NO. 601A-AMENDMENT TABLE OF CONTENTS SCOPE 3 PROJECT HISTORYBACKGROUND 3 Figure No. 1 5 FEASIBILITY AND RECOMMENDATION 6 DISCUSSION 6 Street 6 Figure no. 2 8 Storm Sewer 11 Sanitary Sewer and Water 12 COST ESTIMATE 13 RIGHT-OF-WAY AND EASEMENT 13 AREA TO BE INCLUDED 13 ASSESSMENTS 15 REVENUE 16 PROJECT SCHEDULE 18 APPENDIX A 19 APPENDIX B 20 Figure 3-5 Utility Layout Figure 6 Street Assessment Arnend.mnt � a � Oro G Bdnesrrx PE Howaro A Sanford. PE Michael P Rau PE M ies B Jensen PE Bonestroo Robert A Reserve. PE' Keith A Gordon PE Agnes Al Ring ALCF L Phmp Grave!II, FE Joseph C Anderhk.PE Robert R Pfeffene PE. Thomas W Peterson,PE Karen L Werner PE Rosene Ma Sor az PE Richar V Foster.PE Mchaei C Lynch.PE Gary D Kustohv PE E� Pcharm E Turner PE David O Loskota PE James R Ma:and.PE F Todd Foster. PE vii Anderlik & Gen^F Cook FE Robert C Russek ALA Jerry D Pertzsch. PE Kern R Yap.PE Thomas E Noyes PE Jerry A Bourdon,PE Kenneth P Anderson.PE. Shawn D Custzrspn PE Robert G Schuo.ch! PE Mark A. Hanson. PE Mark R Rolfl PE Cecmo Chyle, PE Associates Susan V EDerhn CPA Michae!T Rautmann PE Mark A Seep PE Charles A Enckson 'Senor Consultant Ted K Feld. PE Gary W Morten,PE Leo M.Pawe!sky Thomas R Anderson,A.I.A Danie!J Edgerton.PE Harlan M Oisor. Engineers & Architects Donald C Burgardt PE Daryl K Kirschenman PE James F Engelhardt Thomas E Angus.PE. Philip J Caswe!!.PE Ismael Martinez. PE Mark D Wallis,PE March 15, 1993 Honorable Mayor and City Council City of Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55122 Re: Lexington Avenue (C.R. 43) & Lone Oak Road (C.S.A.H. 26) Intersection Reconstruction/Signalization Project No. 601A-Amendment File No. 49525 Dear Mayor and Council: Transmitted herewith is c ur report for Lexington Avenue (C.R. 43) and Lone Oak Road (C.S.A.H. 26). Intersection Reconstruction/Signalization, Project No. 601A-Amendment. The proposed improvements associated utility construction and cost estimates are discussed and presented in this report. A preliminary assessment roll is also included. It should be noted this project is similar to Project 601 presented in the summer of 1991 with slight modifications which are discussed herein. We V,ill be pleased to meet with the Council and other interested parties at a mutually convenient time to discuss this report. Yours very truly. BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES, INC. 7t. ,' L/. /fit,/ G .- - Mark A. Hanson MAH:tk I hereby certify that this report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly / Registered Professional Engineer under the laws of the St- e of rnn s ta. /erA Reviewed by: l . ,,/.alt ...� , �( 2 ept. of Public "Irks Mark A. Hanson Date: /6/1 Date: December 24, 1992 Reg. No. 14260 ,. ,,,,,,,L.,,13...0_ Reviewed h\: _A Fina - Director Date: ` \ (.o — a 2� 2335 West Highway 36 • St. Paul, Minnesota 55113 • 612-6364600 ,, ; city of Cagan Report for Lexinc. ton Avenue (C.R. 43) and Lone Oak Road (C.S.A.H. 26) Intersection Reconstruction/Signalization City Project No. 601A-Amendment Eagan, Minnesota March 1993 File No. 49525 Bonestroo Rosene Anderlik & Associates EnglrNn d Archltact• St. Paul, MInnNOta Date City Meeting Action Project # 1-19-93 601A Public Hearing Council did not approve the intersection signalization project and requested further modifications to median designs beyond what County staff proposed. 1-26-93 601A County Physical Dev. Board Cmte. Reviewed Council's action and County staff's modification and recommended to the County Board that no modifications be considered for intersection improvement. 2-2-93 601A County Board Resolution passed supporting original design with no median breaks or shortening of medians and reaffirming original County Board action of 8-6-91. 2-25-93 601A Public Works Cmte. Reviewed County Board's position with local County Commissioners regarding median design modifications. 3-2-93 601A-Amended Council Workshop Agreed to reconsider original design through a new public hearing process. 3-16-93 601A-Amended Public Works Cmte. Met with Crate Prospects to review list of safety concerns. 5-4-93 601A-Amended Public Hearing 9 X6 S FE T`I 1 SS )E S EX T 77zl-n ( CTiZ_vcK 5 EX ; Ti N 4. r osT o CC W /.I c',s S L —F etc. p Nl u S T cypTe M p t 7'r vtJ % r TrZ�a •r , C.- o L/5 - Sa M? N 2T a) S . 0 - T ‘./ 1f�.1+ C L v 7 P.-0 r--∎ f S 77) P ),)c) t+-41,) ^�t iZ e roc rz _ S V'J C'V 12-C- TL fit.. -r Z Sr @ J^i1? (✓4 J Tt1 c5 C.ex_ ,J4, 4 tJc A ° 6 Moo s A- -C fl 1,0/`''Th^-3‘. ID r t ^ - 2- -= ✓v; 4 J: i26 SST /17 ��, c S v C to S-r T} tt¢A-,— —rte t40 4-7-4 by r+4 e� -• 'C�r.e S Ve ++∎C L-L--'S "Cu;F 1hD , A-1 G do 2 7-t+ A---1 S Fp e '-3 L Tr` t 12- b r�- wJ cc- o c t-n P P c r„.4.r r; a . J ti. "., �J rst-'2 iD S T v -- r 4 " .4 L MJ ST S► Ta A-1J b �0 t- Al � t't-G E - r�� .�ti n 1 S �i t' 5 1 1 CC 1 S.)0*.S �JL C M/�� !L t i o 4..7- J C. ■4.2 S -e , •1 G Ao D RE.t,S t') k\Lk CP THE GREIF COMPAN I ES i i CD �� �-4 M-f�oJ.., y , ,..) L S i"7VA-s-i o� 3 i S —7—)4-E, tiI c c..J ral-,, D i 71 o.D o C i4- �i 4. hf-r 'r,,a,J L A,.4 wk ,ct AL(et...)S r- LPL- t`ti0VEMeaT ( RSSV.tin� ),„ y ;et. a iZi G ttT /t rJ L c s --0 G S-P P CS) v 3 F-A T r`f-A-;-; ._ +-1.4)w ; NJ c A— Sete A0 � v..)1. 1-A--; ; "J iV∎ R S -7 f,-, � --Zee J 04-3)-1:,RtS S t -= ►- ye S 1/4.4) g 4-I- I _ 1t M11 s/ 131 I! r !�i G u T Tj r L Aa c. p rJ I o a& 0A-14- -To - �'�J y$ t�5SU2c 5�4 - a� mcc�F �s 49 't-t1 0ST ey7LA- t-) 1Aa I erJcy - , "Pc 2. e gni .4q THE GREIF COMPANIES • ..25'4 }'; a ." . r' -- ,-. - - - ---_o.a.- - �..\_ t S r______J., IL . , 1 ;i I CJ C C O • I� o( -- — G. LL_L L 9 c --, ,...., x T 0 C,:,` • •'I •r I `o 'I 0 i U C I I O o CO = 3 v I _ ,,,---.. h Li• S C— F?;� I I �' w -! `-E �J �o G� _ . , ---1 . r Po, z C. O L L' I ---- q9 `.." z......i U ' '-i 1 IQ * = L iN -�r K E Ul I _— -C ,n'.- * T ---' i - U • . . •:________„, •i I O . 3 a —Th c ,c-e Cc: Rc MA-C-,... N 9--75 . c onestroo UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS Fosene Anderlik EAGAN, t',.'NNESOTA FIGURE 4 171 Associates LEXI'NG-CN AVE.(C.R. 43 • , _ OAK ROAD(O S A H. 43) E'acneo-- E. Arci• tetts -- -- - c ,/, '57::' / 57 : ! 23:` Mi.os Yi vey 36.. S SS∎.1 vJ S i N Teiz v¢-l.. e i W E ' i b-H-rL G o', ►.) -c Th,Ra rio►J LA`. -r.e a") +a C 4r4- key "TVRr t �+S'S n E �c-r'_- r `'--- 1` Li,...) 4- F' /..)e ti.,) C1-✓? �� a�� lc 't off'+�L T y v�k5 vs/* tom d � e 0744 If i 7 l 4 'S 0 W µa ,1 a '1 G N es JJ rid (qC THE GREIF COM PAN I ES l iu 1 .nK L U i�:'J DAKOTA COUNTY DAVID LTEVERDS` P.E. HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT Fax 6-Z' E=' "--:" .olh, Cpp 4_ u;A--} _ ,E N__ APp�E JA__L�' ';'''���FS A k kjNlVE01. March 24 , 1993 Thomas A. Colbert, P.E. Director of Public Works City of Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Rd. Eagan, Minnesota 55122-1897 Re: 28-19, Safety Issues Dear Tom: This is to provide a discussion regarding the written issues handed out at our meeting on March 16, 1993 . Al. The speed limit on Lexington Avenue north of Lone Oak Road is 40 mph. The conditions facing driveways downstream from the intersection are normal driving conditions in urban areas and require motorists actions consistent with the conditions at the time. In addition, the ultimate relocation of the post office should serve to diminish the conflicts. A2 . The center medians proposed will move the left turning vehicles away from the intersection providing a safer transition for motorists when dealing with the intersection. Once through the intersection, motorists will have the necessary space to deal with the traffic conditions downstream. A3 . The design will reduce the unexpected maneuvers close to the intersection. Traffic stream issues are common and not necessarily hazardous when moved away from an intersection. A4 . The right turn lane mentioned will not allow a free movement. Traffic in this lane must stop when the signal is red. This movement will have the same motorists rights and obligations as other right turns at signalized intersections. Pr r,ec c-Re-,_ ;_:e. C Q AN EOJA'L OPPOPTUN'TY EMPLOYER Mr. Thomas A. Colbert Page Two March 18 , 1993 A5 . The plans indicate over 17' from the face of the curb to the building. The roadway design uses a standard 6" barrier curb design which is common on the County's roads. A6. The median length to the south of the intersection provides full storage for 300 ft. This length is designed to permit room for the storage of northbound left turning vehicles for the traffic expected. The median length to the north of the intersection is designed to accommodate much lower left turning volumes and its length is determined by the tapers required to move southbound traffic away from the center of the roadway so as to line up with the through lanes south of the intersection. The greater median length south of the intersection is due in part to the higher speed of traffic and the related taper designs to safely move traffic over and in part to the much higher traffic volumes approaching the intersection. B1. The traffic signal designed for this intersection is full-traffic actuated and will vary the signal green times continuously to meet the traffic demands. B2 . The traffic counts taken and the traffic forecasts indicate that two car length left turn lane for southbound traffic would be adequate to handle the volume. B3 . The double left turn for northbound traffic to turn west is necessary to handle the volume of traffic at the intersection. If the intersection was designed with a single left turn lane the northbound traffic would take 15% more of the signal green times and the forecasted traffic would exceed the intersection capacity. B4 . Issues regarding the freeway operation should not be used to justify an inadequate design at Lexington Avenue and Lone Oak Road. Mn/DOT has the latitude to Mr. Thomas Colbert Page Three March 18 , 1993 increase the current metered flow rate onto I-35E (currently 630 vehicles per hour in the A.M. peak hour) and Mn/DOT is also looking at a project in 1996 to reconstruct the I-35E Lone Oak Road merge area to reduce the present lane-weaving volume restriction on I-35E. When the problems show up at the correct location they can be addressed by the appropriate agency. At the meeting it was suggested that the intersection of Yankee Doodle Road and Lexington Avenue works well and a similar intersection at Lone Oak Road and Lexington Avenue should be considered. The intersection of Yankee Doodle Road and Lexington Avenue was designed and constructed in 1985 and 1986. The traffic data used as a basis to support that design was substantially lower than the data used to support the proposed design at Lone Oak Road and Lexington Avenue. The traffic data collected indicate over 45% higher traffic volumes at the Lone Oak Road/Lexington Avenue intersection than what was measured at the Yankee Doodle Road/Lexington Avenue intersection to determine its design. In addition, the left turning traffic at the Yankee Doodle Road/Lexington Avenue intersection clearly did not indicate the need for double left turns as is indicated on Lexington Avenue at Lone Oak Road. Please feel free to contact me further as necessary if you have any questions or concerns regarding these issues. Sincerely, Peter L. Sorenson Traffic Engineer PLS/ckj cc: Patrice Bataglia, Commissioner, 3rd District Sandra Masin, Eagan City Council Theodore Wachter, Eagan City Council Thomas L. Hedges, Eagan Administrator Dave Everds, County Engineer Jim Roberts p: Colbert WARNER LAW OFFICE :,.445 WASHINGTON DRIVE SUITE 204 EAGAN. MINNESOTA 551 TEL (0I2!452-8224 FAX iC:l2;452-5510 -s.RN 175 A LAW FIRv1 FOR TT UNfl ,7 LA\\ THE WORKPLACE \t 5_cr 2c February 18. 1993 Honorable Thomas Egan Mayor of Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan. MN 55122 Re: Traffics Lights Dear Tom: an- writing to lobby you on an issue that is of some importance to my office. I am concerned about the issue of traffic lights installed at the intersection of Lone Oak Road and Lexington Avenue near the Post Office. My secretary travels this way every nicht to deposit mail and has to contend with the backed up traffic at this intersection. There have been many occasions where she has told me that she has almost been hit at this f ou r-w a y st op. Drivers are rushing t o get o Interstate 35E to get t h m e after e r w r k, and frequently feel they do not need to stop at this intersection. I myself have experienced the frustration of the delays at this intersection. I realize that you have many oche- Bens on your agenda, but I really feel that traffic lights are much needed at this intersection to avoid potential accidents. Thank you for your consideration of this request. Sincerely, Dame E. Warner A~orney at Law DE`t'v.cak S-3 ES c. ST4T7 -1- : SEPVICE '41P- ST =4L MA 552 -2288 1111=111111 7.7_ (C' EE'-2-32 6'2Y6 -2'02 !! .;_ 2S%1-SP. :ATE: !,!arch 19, 19,,'33 REF: !'SF EMC:2AG:RFS:LHoglin:2166 S2EIECT: Project No. ECIR, Lone Oak Road Streets & L:-Y 'ties To: Thomas A. Colbert, P.E. :irector of Public Works City of Eagan Municipal Center Pilot Knot Road Eagan '.12. 55:22-:597 : would like to express my support for the improvements planned for the Lexington Avenue and ECT.E. Oak Road intersection. Fou: hundred over-the-road mei: vans arrive at or leave the !.:inneapolis St. Paul Sulk Y.L: a: ::-. an average day. Projections indicate this truck traffiow i:: increase to four h..:nd:ed seventy trips per day by E. In addition we receive an average of ten vendor deliveries car day for our stock rota and food vending services. Our employees add as many as t :o hundred vehicles to Lexington Avenue traffic during the periods before and after shift oh,..nces. The majority of the trucks and a high percentage cf our commuters use the Lexington Oak Road intersection to gain access to interstate Highway 35E. Ac has been discussed previously with the city, the Posta: Service is planning tc construct Office on property owned by the Postal Service at the southwest corner of E . :::::e and Lexington Avenue. This will result in still more Posta: and CUSIOMEr Lexington Avenue south of Lone Oak Road, many turning left toward the InIersedtion. I.:-..a design for the intersection. The left and right turn lanes on east bound Lone Oak Foad will smooth the flow of tra" - exiting Interstate Highway 35E. The double left turn lane and sincle right ;urn lane for north bound Lexington Avenue will ease congestion that sometimes reaches pas: Olutvie',. :rive. These changes will help the commuters and residents of Eagan, the t.:siness and industrial community, and the Postal Service and it's customers, by providing faster, safer access to this par: of the city. ie EppfeC:7'- ''' city's efforts to plan and implement improvements such as this. ' ' . 4 ....441114, ..... / .-......, _ .0 fr — ."..nneapolis St .aul Sulk Mail Center , --. R. .z..- - mv _. .- „,,___„... file PRO- -0l6 ,....— . Hoz lin, do Take Time To Be Safe: ( 3 (/ -1I7c1A9 /0 7 - D e,' ,,i/VE °I' - 2- E,Y,ti -tv N , c>701(6,. -;)/(-)(g/Sat. i'.2-'i 4. , Ci/i / w,/e4.S.nr-Eu-yz, c iio d-71/ <A- .„iie, ix/ ; 1,4xe,,,e_ sPe.(, 2)et-t. Ace bl-a -fi 1 - Ar .,i_j,(,,ii-ti-teri,Xe M-4-el -6:e; - ie ' , rez-cf, (/,- itt. 'r27k-e-1, � � .tC�,Of7/1,.2en r!J � -A? - yet .�� � ,i:�-tE� (z,rt � �/ylL L J "X-C- et . , -ii-r22‘ 47:7/ 4.2 7Zerlf i ,ee'77t1-• e-2,7ei : LAY , ki,' _Ide, .6/72 -/tAe.iztptee€ 6,(1 /tx-,W! ,4",t--e ..a,,e- e.-7-L„,_ ,i0,,A„,,,,,„ . eft);$,z ,yeu.ems . . - .>-,---a.- .3-9,t . r IC < ' 5-''- ''' - lomm. S._,Ite 149C stern mutual Life' Te.eP-:.,e 6'2-9:1 210C Facs rre E.. .2-921-205-3 REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT OFFICE AT7: 13, 1993 '.■!:- 'T.,. Wachter B:ackha,k Road E-7an. MN 551:2 Ms. Sandra Macin 1-95 Carnelian Lane Eagan, MN '-'''....22 RE: Project 601 Lexington & Lone Oak Road Interchange Improvements De : MS. MasTh: I a:n v.r1', 7,-.g to encourage you as a member of the Eagan City Council to support the -,,rcoosta up-zrad:nz of the intersection at Lexington Avenue and Lone Oak Road. Th.. : a needed irnpro%ement for the area and it is time to have the work completed. L -7 :1-',7, 7a.. -: and support for Project 601 will be appreciated. /--- _.---- / ..----,---- , ..,---- ,--- / 2 : ' / / DL::: E- Huber Rec':Dna: Manager DEH =1._-) .5450._ --a, \--,;,--,..„E,Fp..„ ,,,,_-_ .%. ,E r, •N(.:4"r- '-‘`,,,','\' • k.' 1 APERTUS TECHNOLOGIES TEL No . 612 828 0773 Apr 28 ,93 22 : 13 P .01 e‘i/9/ ,26 April 20, 1993 Shawn Hunter City Couneilmember, City of Eagan Eagan City Hall 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55122 Dear Councilmember: 1 am writing you as a resident of Eagan, who also works in the city, regarding the current issue before the city council of installing traffic lights at the intersection of Lone Oak and Lexington. I am encouraging you to please vote In favor of the installing the lights. I live near the intersection of Lexington and Cliff and travel the length of Lexington approximately 10 times a week. The Lone Oak - Lexington intersection is definitely a highly travelled and extremely dangerous area. I have personally witnessed numerous accidents and near collisions there. I understand, through the media, that one of the reasons a traffic light has not yet been approved is because of the pressure from local landowners due to a requirement necessitating the addition of a median. I can sympathize with their situation but feel the needs and safety of the people travelling this area far outweigh the inconvenience. I am not convinced that this issue cannot be resolved without the addition of the median. This may be a matter outside your scope of authority, but there could be ways of getting this done. I hope you agree we need to have this problem resolved as soon as possible before further injuries and damage result. THIS PROBLEM WILL NOT GET BETTER! In fact, it is my opinion that other intersections along Lexington also need traffic lights. But the Lone Oak area is definitely the most dangerous. I have been very frustrated with many of the actions of the city council in the past. AIthough I don't blame them entirely, since they have also responded to the pleas of others in the community, l am getting tired of the selfishness of a minority of residents preventing the rest of us from doing what is best for Eagan as a community. The council is repeatedly deciding issues on the personal desires of individuals without regard for the needs, safety, and betterment of the city as a whole. COMMON SENSE WILL TELL YOU THE RIGHT THING TO DO IS TO VOTE IN FAVOR OF THE TRAFFIC LIGHTS, I cannot understand how anyone could see this issue any other way. And I will tell you now that I will not vote for anyone in the next election who does not support the installation of the traffic lights. Again, I urge you to please support and fight for those of us who want to improve Eagan as a safe and enjoyable community. Thank you for your time and attention. Sincerely, I "' ' —j ' CAtf £ Tim Day 3 R=90‘ 612ES-0: 04-29-93 11 : 20AM P001 #25 l April 20, 1993 Mr. Tom Egan ---� City Hall 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55122 Dear Mayor Egan: This letter is to encourage the Eagan City Council to install traffic light control at the intersection of Lexington and Lone Oak, in Eagan, MN. This intersection is becoming dangerous to the residents of Eagan as well as those traveling to Eagan for other purposes. I a- employed by Cray Research, 655 Lone Oak Rd., Eagan, and live southern metro area. The direct route for me to travel to work is N-35E to the Lone Oak Exit. Because of the delays and dangerous situation at the Lexington/Lone Oak intersection, I travel an alternate route that skirts me around Eagan. r� Because of the alternative route I take home from work I no longer shop at Rainbow Foods and Walmart - Eagan Town Center, or Cub Foods on 35E and Cliff Road. I miss the convenience of these shopping trips on the way home from work. But not enough to put myself in danger and travel through the Lexington/Lone Oak intersection! Please consider my request for stop light control at the intersection of Lexington and Lone Oak. Thank you. • • i _ Kathleen K. Capps Cray Research Inc. 655 Lone Oak Road Eagan, MN 55121 kkc, r !roc- Mayor and City Council Members, The following letter was circulated at Cray Research and I - 2 2 d_.' t agree more. I can't believe that 3 or 4 homeowners' inaonvenaen:e could hold up such a much needed civic arpravement . What' s even more unbelievable is if that anaonvenaen:e is considered serious enough to stop the -- prc-,ect, why isn' t the project done without the median ? A new stop light system was installed at Pilot Knob and 2eerwccd�recently without a median. Why does it have to be e_:her with a median or not at all at Lone Oak and Lexington ?? let' s get this intersection fixed. This is the letter that was ___ __._atEC. :' s__e rimy :f yr_ have been as upset as I am about the Lone Oak and -terse: - and the lack of stop and gc lights . The delays wei_-_ _-.. ___.. , the sp ,Y snowy and rainy - of 2-..a• an.. e., eoial a^ sno we _: _==- - t - _' s a real hazard, .'ve nearly been ha- er_ - E - __ mostly because of impatient pe:p-E E -- wa-.t axe-tu_ns'proper_y. e aware that there have been several town ree: of _ m:_ _- `c ass-e and the .gaff:.. __ghts have been voted ^: n de^-accrof -n€ 'wa r _ne coun.ty•ans:sts has tc be done to be ffe ne s have come fro-. the few homeowners wffeet_ _ • ` -E __ hwes' corner ant dawn the block towards wh=sE ..___es s. _ _-. :'.E northwest r. a^^a mea_ar which would Y72), - - -he _aunty wants to put r _�: __, �E_ se homeowners tc t;._ into their property . t :'__ _ -�-- a==__ to _.ne ..the -cK a- turn ar ^.d in order to u -.a':E -��E- t - �_»`� ,s �_- _ c -ms's would be an inconvenience ` ge t Ea safety -25ue and the eE-ac+ when. ea: oar` has to stop, __ _".Em --- _tne- : `-c^ flow o f f f far ooutweagns their objections. -h...__ are- = .t_. v c -- -•' .. ,.r2_ --! the town meetings so that est - EVE:- :near -2w.='er _ These -e __ e :rang ever hear The County Co*'¢*._ss,one_ told c-._ =-.E s_�E :_ -•-_ - - f _ of the traffic lights, :nth_. "E _.._e __ - . -- y s y red of all the delays . We've go_ .__- CE d= e a-c__fere- =encr someday, someone as gain; to be killed at -r _ - ---- . ��a- wo__d be a shame to wait then . ;rmstr=- - - _ v _e-'.2 La-.e Eaga- , r. --_2: c April 26 , 1993 . ,� 2 8 Mayor Tom Egan 3830 Pilot Knob Road l ~ Eagan , MN 55122 Dear Mayor Egan , As a resident of Eagan for 32 years and an employee of Cray Research , I ' m writing in regard to the lack of proper traffic lights at the intersection of Lone Oak Road and Lexington in Eagan . I understand this issue will be discussed at the City Council meeting on May 4 , 1993 . I do intend to be at the meeting . I pass thru that intersection twice a day Monday thru Friday enroute to work at Cray Research . I ' m amazed no one has been seriously injured or killed there as a result of no stop and go lights . I ' ve come so close to being hit on several occasions mostly because drivers don ' t wait to take their turn as they should . The delays we sit thru most mornings are long especially on bad weather days . I called the DOT after one snowy morning and told them they should put a policeman on that corner to direct traffic and keep it moving smoothly on these kinds of days . I understand 28 , 000 cars and trucks pass thru that intersection Monday thru Friday . I feel the safety of all these people plus keeping traffic moving smoothly far outweighs the concerns of the few homeowners along Lexington between the corner and Knox Lumber Co . The majority certainly doesn ' t rule in this case does it? I realize these families have been there a long time but the roads have to keep up with progress . But this is like saying that just because the Mall of America was built and has to handle so many more thousands of cars each day , they shouldn ' t change any roads or add signs because they might inconvenience a few homeowners that live nearby . Please try and see the position that the thousands of us that use that intersection are taking . Traffic lights are extremely necessary and the sooner the better before a serious accident happens . Sincerely , Colleen Linnan Colleen Linnan 4265 Amber Drive Eagan , M Eagan , MN 55122 — Mayor Tom Egan (CC) 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan , MN 55122 Mayor Tom Egan (\ 7'.PR 3 City Hall 3830 Pilot Knob Rd. Eagan, MN 55122 .- Dear Mayor Egan : I will be unable to attend next Tuesday' s town meeting, but I did want tc voice my concern over an issue that will be discussed at that meeting. The issue is that of traffic lights at the juncture of Lexington and Lone Oak Road. I pass through this intersection twice each working day, and have done so for more than a year. I travel more than 40 miles round trip daily, and this one intersection is the most hazardous part of my daily trip. The lack of stop lights is completely incomprehensible to me. This is a heavily traveled intersection, not just with automobiles but also with LARGE trucks and other vehicles . I can ' t count the number of times I 've nearly been hit because of people making improper turns or because of bad road conditions due to snow, ice or poor visiblity. I often go several miles out of my way to avoid this intersection when weather conditions are bad because I am afraid of what might happen at this poorly lit, poorly plowed, and dangerous intersection. If it ' s impossible (for whatever reason) to put in traffic lights , could please just put stop signs on the Lexington corners and make Lone Oak a you P-- _.- - � P P thru-way. This is how it ' s done on most other very busy streets that I travel -- the traffic on the lesser-traveled street has to wait for traffic to pass on the heavily traveled street . This would, perhaps , alleviate some of the congestion and the indecision when people approach this corner . I urge to you consider putting traffic lights at this hazardous intersection . If you want the office parks and the businesses in that portion of Eagan to continue to grow, I would hope that you would try to provide a safe environment for the people who have to travel to and from those parks on a daily basis . Thank you . 1 :Jean. Wilson 4640 139th St . W. Savage, MN 55378 cc: Patricia Awada Shawn Hunter Sandra Masin Tom Wachter �-E� f • M l c h o • I J . M • r c h o n t • n, 3 0 April 28, 1993 _._.--------- --- --The Honorable Tom Egan Mayor Eagan City Hall 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan,MN 55122 Dear Mr.Mayor. I am writing to ask your support in installing a traffic signal at the intersection of Lone Oak Road and Lexington Avenue. I understand that the issue is on the agenda for the next City Council meeting,on May 4th. As an employee of Cray Research,I have occasion to pass through Lone Oak and Lexing- ton every work day.For the past several months,however,I have taken to driving several miles out of my way just to avoid this intersection,particularly during afternoon rush hour. It just isn't safe. I have often seen cars and big trucks lined up 10 deep, two lanes in each of the four direc- tions.Even the careful,patient drivers have a difficult time knowing when to go and when to wait. And one impatient,careless driver can create a real hazard for everyone. Lone Oak is the same two-lane country road that it was when I moved to Eagan 11 years ago.Unfortunately,it is now carrying heavy industrial and commuter traffic.There are actually several improvements needed to accommodate the increased traffic,but a signal at Lone Oak and Lexington is the most urgent need. I have family and loved ones who travel these roads,and I just hope that the roads can be improved before tragedy strikes. Sincerely, Michael J.Merchant • 3460 GotMew Drtve#2111 Eagan Minnesota 55123 (61 )454.3497 APR-30-1993 0850 FROM METRO MARKETING TO 6814612 P.01 RECEriEr MEMOLIMUM 111110, To: Mr.Tom Egan From: Metro Marketing Associates 1000 Apollo Road Eagan,MN 55121 Re: Dangerous Intersection of Lone Oak Road and Lexington It has been recently brought to our attention that at the upcoming council meeting the above named intersection will be considered once again for a traffic light. As a business located near this intersection we feel it is crucial at this time to install traffic lights. All of our employees HAVE to use this intersection daily. It may seem unimportant to you,but this is a big factor in our employees being "late"for work". PLEASE consider at least having these lights operational at peek travel times!!! (a-3 April 29, 1993 County Project No. 26-19 CSAH 26 (Lone Oak Rd) and CR 43 (Lexington Ave) Background County Project 26-19 for the reconstruction of CSAH 26 (Lone Oak Road) between I-35E and TH 55 has been planned by the City of Eagan and Dakota County since the early 1980's. The project was included in the 1985 five year Dakota County Capital Improvement Program (CIP) for 1989 construction. During the CIP reviews in 1990 the City asked Dakota County to accelerate the construction of Diffley Road and delay the construction of Lone Oak Road. The 1991 CIP was modified to include a project to construct the intersection area on Lone Oak Road with Lexington Avenue and install a traffic signal in 1991 and the larger Lone Oak Road reconstruction project was rescheduled to 1993. The City Council at their July 16, 1991 meeting asked Dakota County to modify the proposed design to allow the property owners on Lexington Avenue to be able to make left turns to and from their property. The Dakota County Physical Development Board Committee met on July 30, 1991 and reviewed City request and heard directly from the property owners. The Board members endorsed the original design and a resolution was passed at the August 6, 1991 County Board meeting restating the need for the center medians and asking that the City re-address this subject and approve the plans. The city did not approve the plans and the intersection project was subsequently cancelled. The intersection work was proposed to be combined back into the larger CSAH 26 project programmed for 1993 . Lexington Avenue Center Medians The area of greatest disagreement is the proposed construction of a center median on Lexington Avenue which will prohibit left turns to and from private driveways close to the intersection. The purpose of the center median on Lexington Avenue near Lone Oak Road is two fold. The first is to control traffic near the intersection to reduce the likelihood of safety problems. Driveways close to busy intersections are a source of unexpected vehicle maneuvers at a time when traffic is distracted by intersection activities. County policies have encouraged new 1 � developments to provide substantial distance between intersections and driveways. This center median will prohibit left turns within the reaction distance area of the intersection. Secondly, the center median will provide a positive barrier separating opposing traffic on an extraordinarily wide approach. The south approach to the intersection is 6 lanes wide with 4 lanes coming into the intersection and 2 lanes going away. The directional control provided by the median will assist traffic. Traffic Traffic data was collected at the intersection of Lone Oak Road at Lexington Avenue in October and November, 1990 and included hourly approach counts and peak hour intersection turning movement traffic studies. These data and year 2010 Traffic Forecast from the Dakota County computer traffic forecasting model became the basis for the proposed design which was presented to the City of Eagan in July, 1991 at a neighborhood meeting and at the City Council meeting. Additional traffic data was collected in October, 1992 to determine changes in patterns since the 1990 studies were made. These counts further illustrated the need for the proposed design and indicated a pattern of continuing growth. The 1990 traffic studies indicated 21, 000 daily trips traveled through the intersection and the 1992 studies showed an increase to 24, 000 vehicles entering the intersection daily. The year 2010 traffic forecast indicates that the intersection should be designed to handle 40, 000 vehicles per day. The intersection is designed to accomodate double left turning lanes for northbound traffic to turn west. This double turn design is recommended when the traffic volume making the turn is expected to exceed 300 vehicles per hour. The traffic counts taken in 1990 and again in 1992 indicated existing northbound to westbound left turn exceeds 400 vehicles in the A.M. P eak hour. The traffic counts also indicated that the P.M. peak hour is currently very close to 300 (287) . The proposed signal and lane arrangements are needed for present traffic as well as the expected traffic growth. Interim Design In an effort to help secure City approval of the larger Lone Oak Road project (I-35E to TH 55) , County engineering staff agreed to recommend a compromise design to the County Board in which the construction of the raised median on Lexington Avenue north of Lone Oak Road would be delayed until problems developed. This proposal was not met with agreement at the County Board and the Board restated their approval of the original design. // (e9 Scope of Project The City Council did not approve the larger Lone Oak Road project and the 1993 program was revised to include the Lexington Avenue intersection area with a traffic signal. The County has prepared preliminary plans illustrating the limits of construction and lane arrangements. Detailed construction plans have not been completed and therefore detailed engineering estimate of costs is not available. The preliminary design indicates that Lone Oak Road would be reconstructed from a point 900' west of Lexington Avenue to a point 1300' east of Lexington Avenue. This work would include widening, curb and gutter, storm sewer, sanitary sewer and trails. The project would be designed to minimize duplication of reconstruction anticipating that Lone Oak Road reconstruction to the east would occur in the near future. Some tapers to the old roadway would be necessary, however, to handle traffic in the interim. The Lexington Avenue reconstruction would begin 800' south of Lone Oak Road and end 500' north of Lone Oak Road. The total project reconstructs 3500' of roadway. I-35E Freeway Operation The I-35E east ramp intersection with CSAH 26 is- over 1200' west of CR 43 . It is not recommended that operational issues associated with I-35E be used to limit design issues at the CR 43 intersection. When operational problems occur at I-35E, they can be properly identified and appropriate actions taken at that time. Prepared By : Pete Sorenson County Traffic Engineer Dakota County Highway Department (PS-4/29/93) n:2619 // (.( (e0 APR- 28 - 93 WED 1 4 : 1 6 8 O N E S T R O O 11 ASSOCIATES P _ 0 2 B �y (]r,ei icuvIckx,PP ritMyc)A Woad,Pt Mew P tiu rr M.,I, VAMP, 1'I ot /estroo )t><wi w bow r.Ph• Kcsr,A (iMMn PE P1Wp 1 Prr,t,Pt Mir,11 h.rrcl t•f iiiii rl` knew,C h w.W.Pt mu"r' ',went PC. PoNes N RYA A IC P 'A'f v.►M M.PI sene twn�l kt'v.uv Ph ItitruP/W Pcpltt. Pt fROpLs W PM.PSnn Pt 4n.ci r uw.rrr, PI NUN �/�p t�/' & I 1604 f turret Pr t].vv)r r iota Pi What!C lyric,,P( c y t) KrAr,dt/.Ye Y IV�iI�IP� f.>; G~rv1k (n51 rl IIu0tA( Ls'. AMA JY+wsM AyaanC.PE P kMkif q PI rrvnnei P Allyn.Pf .Ihry A ROAT1111,PE Ntry()Penh Pt Meth R ryyr PI 1111 Associates I 'ter G 4 Nutt 111 0'1. 04,01 A Oturoart Pc vermin P Anuerwn P• ChsAiu% 1 TOT" r.1 k,sn he Clwmt t P urnur;t RALIT MM it SMO P Aoh Pt Pww+I) t,wswv., PI 'Meru,C ra.rtaw kd K 6.•t1.Of Wilt A.7W PE Cecru)rr,w, of Engineers & Architects Tl.urr.■c A'vt"„or,A A ,try W Ataltn,Pt Pune,A I n t,un IfOnaal r antleteit.PE ArieN 1 Pixeeon PC IM M rtrw+ar Irtbr•■C AINAA.PI• Mon bOt tePln&Pr Pt w M tom, April 28, 1993 •( I MWn0.-/ Pt PI• J Cat* Pf 0/..e.I I rwrourtr City of Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, Minnesota 55122 Attn: Thomas Colbert Re: Lexington Avenue/Lone Oak Road Intersection Reconstruction/Signalization Project 601A-Amendment Our File No. 49525 Dear Tom: We have determined the cost to construct the intersection improvement at Diffley Road and Lexington Avenue based on the recent low bid received for that project. We have compared the low bid cost to the amount estimated in the feasibility report for the improvements at Lone Oak Road and Lexington Avenue. It should be noted the estimated cost in the feasibility report for Lone Oak Road and Lexington Avenue includes 5% contingency and 35% for overhead, Therefore to make an accurate comparison between the construction cost for each project we have reduced the project cost to include the contingency and overhead costs estimated for Lone Oak Road/Lexington Avenue. Lone Oak Road Feasibility Report Lone Oak Road Diffley Road 5%+35% Overhead No Overhead Construction Bid Street 550,000 C 111 Signal Traffic 1 111 106,000 91 Bituminous 1111 28,000 St02131 SeWeT 130,000 92,000 Sanitary Sewer/Water Main Alignment 1 111 28,000 .• 1,11 495,30'7 R-9 5%2335 West Highway 36 • St. Paul. MN 5511 - • •1 - - i1 _ r il 04-26-93 02 : 19PM P002 #14 APR - 28 - 93 WED 14 : 17 B O N E S T R O O & ASSOCIATES P . 03 Mr, Thomas Colbert Re: Lexington Avenue/Lone Oak Road City of Eagan Page 2 As noted the estimated construction cost to construct Lone Oak Road and Lexington Avenue is higher than the low bid amount for Diff ley Road and Lexington Avenue. We have noted in reviewing the low bid for Diff ley Road the bid unit prices are less by approximately 10% than estimated in the feasibility report. This savings may result when the project is bid however the Lone oak Road project is significantly smaller than the Diffley Road project ($642,000 verse $3,000,000). In addition the difference between the low bidder and 2nd bidder for Diffley Road is approximately $500,000 ($3.0 million verse $3.5 million). The storm sewer cost for Lone Oak Road is higher because additional pipe is required (1630' verse 1295'). If you have any questions please contact me at this office. Yours truly, BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES, INC. (//2Aek a #"-ii-eze Mark A. Hanson MAH:dh (bi g.g_g 61263611311 04-28-93 02 19P P003 #14 Agenda Information Memo May 4, 1993 City Council Meeting METROPOLITAN AIRPORTS COMMISSION LEGISLATION POSITION A. Consider a Recommendation by the Airport Relations Commission to Support House File 431 and Senate File 508 Concerning Metropolitan Airports Commission Representation--Enclosed on pages 1111 through 1'p-is a staff memorandum covering minutes of the City's Airport Relation Committee's consideration of HF 431 and SF 508 regarding additional representation on the MAC. In effect, the legislation would provide an additional member of the Metropolitan Airports Commission for the City's of Eagan, Mendota Heights,Bloomington, Richfield and Minneapolis. Under the proposed legislation, each City's representative would be appointed by that City much as representatives of the Minneapolis and St. Paul Mayors offices are now. As noted in the minutes, the committee indicated that additional direct representation would be beneficial and would respond to the current situation in which a single representative attempts to balance the interests of Bloomington, Eagan and Mendota Heights. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny a recommendation by the Eagan Airport Relations Committee to support HF 431 and SF 508 to provide for direct representation on the Metropolitan Airports Commission for cities immediately adjacent to the airport. \ Le 1 t .x MEMO _city of eagan — TO: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES FROM: ACTING COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR HOHENSTEIN DATE: APRIL 20, 1993 SUBJECT: AIRPORT RELATIONS COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION - SUPPORTING HOUSE FILE 431/SENATE FILE 508 REGARDING REPRESENTATION ON THE METROPOLITAN AIRPORTS COMMISSION At its meeting of April 13, 1993, the Eagan Airport Relations Committee recommended that the City Council take official action to support House File 431 authored by Representative Edwina Garcia and its companion bill Senate File 508 providing for a city representative on the Metropolitan Airports Commission for all cities of which portions are within the Ldn 65 noise contour. Under this legislation, the appointments would be made by the city and the representative would serve for the same term as the mayor of that city. The legislation will provide an additional MAC representative for the Cities of Eagan, Mendota Heights, Bloomington, Richfield and Minneapolis. Depending upon the Ldn 65 contour used, it may or may not include an additional seat for the City of St. Paul. In taking this action, the Committee referenced the fact that Eagan's current representative attempts to balance the interests of Eagan, Mendota Heights and Bloomington and that more direct responsibility and accountability would be served by a more representative Airports Commission. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny a recommendation by the Eagan Airport Relations Committee to support House File 431 and Senate File 508 relative to the Metropolitan Airports Commission representation. Act g Community Development Director JDH/vmd MINUTES OF THE AIRPORT RELATIONS COMMITTEE Eagan, Minnesota April 13, 1993 A meeting of the Eagan Airport Relations Committee was held on Tuesday, April 13, 1993 at 7:00 p.m. Present were Jane Vanderpoel, Pat Todd, Al Bache! and George Martin. Absent were Lois Monson, Dustin Mirick, Tim Ring, Greg Langen and Bob Cooper. Also present was Acting Community Development Director Hohenstein. ACTING CHAIR In the absence of the Chair and Vice-Chair, George Martin consented to serve as Chair for the meeting. AGENDA The agenda was accepted as presented by acclamation. OATH OF OFFICE Hohenstein administered the Oath of Office to Alternate Members Pat Todd and Al Bache'. MINUTES Upon motion by Todd, seconded by Vanderpoel, all members voting in favor, the minutes of the March 9, 1993 meeting were approved as presented. AIRPORT LEGISLATION Hohenstein overviewed the two areas of legislation being considered in the 1993 session. He stated that the bills concerning stopping the dual track airport planning process which have been opposed by the City of Eagan had not been reported out of committee and appeared to be dead for the session. He indicated that there was also legislation Introduced by Representatives Garcia and Ranum modifying the representation on the Metropolitan Airports Commission to permit cities adjacent to the airport to have additional representation on the MAC. He stated that the Garcia bill would give each city partially included within the 65 Ldn contour one additional MAC seat to be appointed by the individual city, much as Minneapolis and St. Paul have now. He stated that the Ranum bill would only permit representation If 5,000 or more people within the City were within the Ldn 65 contour. He stated that the City of Eagan would have a MAC seat under the Garcia bill but would not have one under the Ranum bill. Martin asked how the City is currently represented. Hohenstein stated that there are typically broad, multi-city districts with individual commissioners appointed by the Governor. He stated that Eagan's current district includes Bloomington, Eagan and Mendota Heights and that the representative lives in Bloomington. Martin stated that it would be positive to have a closer relationship with the City's MAC representative. Todd stated that she agreed with Martin that there was a need for better representation of noise- affected cities on the MAC. Vanderpoel stated that the City should support the Garcia bill to ensure better representation. Page 2/EAGAN AIRPORT RELATION COMMITTEE April 13, 1993 Chair Martin opened the discussion up to the public and Don Grant of 1275 Towerview Road stated that the City's current MAC representative did not support Eagan on the corridor issue and that the City's Interest should be better reflected by its MAC member. Martin stated that even if the airport moves, Eagan remains affected by noise and would have similar Interests. Grant stated that other large areas around the region and state have one representative as well. John Grund of 1431 Lone Oak Road stated that many aircraft are currently outside the corridor and that the MAC Is not responsive to the City's needs relative to this issue. Upon motion by Todd, seconded by Vanderpoel, all members voting in favor, the Committee recommended that the City Council support the Garcia bill expanding MAC representation to Include one representative from each city touched by the Ldn 65 contour, such representative to be appointed by the city. INVER GROVE HEIGHTS CORRIDOR RESOLUTION Hohenstein introduced the item and stated that residents of the City of Inver Grove Heights had forwarded a request to MASAC requesting that all traffic be turned at the three mile turn point. He stated that he had contacted the City of Inver Grove Heights and that this was not an official City position but was put forward by individual residents on that City's Airport Relations Committee. Martin asked If Inver Grove Heights had supported Mendota Heights In the corridor discussion. Hohenstein responded that they had. Todd asked how MASAC representatives are chosen. Hohenstein stated that they are appointed by the individual cities. Todd stated that she felt Inver Grove Heights' representatives should represent official positions of the City rather than positions of groups of residents. Martin stated that as long as the request was not an official position of the City of Inver Grove Heights, the City of Eagan should not make too much of the issue and draw unnecessary attention to it. Vanderpoel agreed with that statement. Todd stated that staff should work aggressively with the MASAC Operations Committee to prevent further consideration of the Inver Grove Heights residents' proposal, but indicated that she felt this was consistent with previous City policy and did not require a separate action at the present time. She stated that if the issue is reported favorably out of the Operations Committee, staff should return it to the Committee and the City for further conskeration. Martin stated that he felt staff had sufficient direction with previous policy statements by the Committee and City to move forward with this item without further action. CORRIDOR UPDATE Hohenstein stated that there was no additional information relative to the corridor at the present time. Grant and Grund reiterated their concerns that substantial numbers of aircraft were south of the corridor boundary. DUAL TRACK AIRPORT PLANNING PROCESS Hohenstein highlighted the responses from the MAC to the comments by the City of Eagan contained In the dual track scoping report comments. He also referred the City to the items In the packet outlining the upcoming steps in the dual track process. PART 150 LAND USE PROGRAM Hohenstein reported that the construction activity on the 1992 homes was continuing and that the design activity on the 1993 homes had begun. Martin requested that residents of the Part 150 homes be a.- Agenda Information Memo May 4, 1993 City Council Meeting ORDINANCE AMENDMENT/IMPOUNDMENT OF BARKING DOGS/ RABIES CONTROL B. Amendment, Ordinance, City Code Chapter 10, Regulations for Impoundment of Barking Dogs and Rabies Control--An ordinance amendment to Chapter 10, Section 10.11, regarding the impoundment of habitually barking dogs and rabies control regulations has been reviewed by all departments and is presented to the Council with the recommendation for approval. A copy of the ordinance with suggested endments marked appropriately is included for the Council's information on pages M through 141 ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny an amendment to City Code Chapter 10, Section 10.11 regarding the impoundment of habitually barking dogs and providing for rabies control regulations. ORDINANCE NO. 2ND SERIES AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EAGAN, MINNESOTA, AMENDING EAGAN CITY CODE CHAPTER TEN ENTITLED "PUBLIC PROTECTION, CRIMES AND OFFENSES" BY AMENDING SECTION 10 . 11 REGARDING IMPOUNDMENT OF HABITUALLY BARKING DOGS AND RABIES CONTROL REGULATIONS; AND BY ADOPTING BY REFERENCE EAGAN CITY CODE CHAPTER 1 AND SECTION 10. 99 . The City Council of the City of Eagan does ordain: Section 1 . Eagan City Code Chapter Ten is hereby amended by changing Section 10 . 11 , subd. 6 , to read as follows: Subd. 6 . Public Nuisance. 1 . Unlawful Acts . It is unlawful for the owner of any dog or cat to: • A. Permit such animal to habitually bark, cry, whimper , howl , whine, or emit any other loud or unusual noises ; B. Permit such animal to damage or defecate in or upon public property or the property of another; C. Permit dog or cat feces to accumulate on the owner' s premises for more than 24 hours; D. Interfere with any police officer, or other City employee , in the performance of his/her duty to enforce this Section; E. Keep or own four or more dogs or cats , or combination thereof , over six (6) months of age without a kennel permit. 2 . Impoundment. The animal control officer or police officer may seize, impound or restrain any doq or cat which has been permitted to habitually bark, cry, whimper, howl, whine or emit any other loud or unusual noise for a period of two or more hours whenever the owner of such animal cannot be immediately located or has failed, upon order by the animal control officer or a police officer, to prevent such animal from habitually making such noises . Subdivisions 4 and 5 of this Section shall apply to any doq or cat impounded under this subdivision. Section 2 . Eagan City Code Chapter Ten is hereby amended by changing Section 10 . 11 , subd. 10 , to read as follows : n1 c) Subd. 10 . Rabies Control . A. Inoculation. Any -Ever3 owner of a dog or cat over six months of age must have such dog or cat inoculated against rabies in accordance with this Subdivision and possess a certificate of a veterinarian duly licensed to practice veterinary medicine within the State of Minnesota which certificate shall state that the dog or cat has a current inoculation against rabies. Any dog vaccinated with a modified live or trimmune killed rabies vaccine shall be revaccinated at no more than 24-month intervals ; any dog vaccinated with any other killed rabies vaccine shall be revaccinated at no more than 12-month intervals. Any cat shall be revaccinated at no more than 12-month intervals for any and all types of vaccines used. B. Animal Bites. 1 . Persons Bitten. a . Whenever any dog or cat has bitten a person, the owner, having been so notified, either orally or in writing, must: (a) provide a certificate of current rabies inoculation; and (b) immediately quarantine the dog or cat at the owner's home or other suitable place of confinement as directed by the responsible officer of the City for a period of ten (10) days after the occurrence. -�- b. During the quarantine, the dog or cat shall be securely confined in a building, locked kennel or a yard which is enclosed by a fence not less than five (5) feet high and so constructed that the animal cannot escape or otherwise leave the enclosure, and which will not permit other animals or persons to enter, for the purpose of preventing the animal from biting or otherwise coming in contact with persons or other animals. c. If the dog or cat dies or shows signs of illness or if it escapes, the animal control officer or Police Department must be notified immediately. The confinement, testing and treatment costs , in addition to all other expenses incurred, as the result of a dog or cat biting a person, shall be at the expense of the owner of the animal. - - d. In the event that a certificate of current rabies inoculation is not provided or upon a reasonable suspicion that the dog or cat may be rabid, the dog or cat shall be immediately seized and subjected to the necessary tests by a doctor of veterinary medicine for the purpose of determining if it is infected with rabies. Any animal, other than a dog or cat, which has bitten a person may be destroyed and taken to the University Diagnostic Lab to be determined if the animal has been infected with rabies. 2 . Dog or Cat Bitten. a . Whenever any rabid-bearing animal has bitten a doq or cat, the owner of the bitten dog or cat , having been so notified, either orally or in writing, must: (a) provide a certificate of current rabies inoculation to the Police Department; (b) immediately_ revaccinate the dog or cat; and (c) immediately quarantine the dog or cat at the owner' s home or other suitable place of confinement as directed by the responsible officer of the City for a period of 180 days . The dog or cat may be released from quarantine after forty (40) days if the following are satisfied: 1 . The dog or cat was vaccinated for rabies at least 21 days before exposure; 2 . The dog or cat was revaccinated for rabies immediately after exposure at which time the forty (40) -day period shall begin; and 3 . A written report as required by state law is received by the Board of Animal Health. b. Any quarantine of a dog or cat under this Subparagraph shall be in accordance with Section 10 . 11, subd. 10 (B) (1) (b) . c. If the dog or cat dies or shows signs of illness or escapes, the animal control officer or Police Department must be notified immediately. The confinement, testing and treatment costs, in addition to all other expenses incurred, as the result of a dog or cat bitten by another animal shall be at the expense of the owner of the dog or cat bitten. d. In the event that a certificate of current rabies inoculation is not provided, or the owner of the dog or cat bitten failed to comply with the provisions herein, or upon a reasonable suspicion that the dog or cat may be rabid, the doq or cat shall be immediately seized and sublect to the necessary test by a doctor of veterinary_ medicine for the purpose of determining if it is infected with rabies and shall be quarantined as provided in Section 10 . 11 , subd. 10 (B) (1) (b) . Any animal , other than a doq or cat, which has bitten a dog or cat shall be destroyed and taken to the University Diagnostic Lab to be determined if the animal has been infected with rabies . Section 3 . Eagan City Code Chapter 1 entitled "General Provisions and Definitions Applicable to the Entire City Code Including 'Penalty for Violation'" and Section 10 . 99 , entitled "Violation a Misdemeanor" are hereby adopted in their entirety by reference as though repeated verbatim. Section 4 . Effective Date. This ordinance shall take effect upon its adoption and publication according to law. ATTEST: CITY OF EAGAN City Council By: E. J. VanOverbeke By: Thomas A. Egan Its: Clerk Its: Mayor Date Ordinance Adopted: Date Ordinance Published in the Legal Newspaper: Agenda Information Memo May 4, 1993 City Council Meeting ORDINANCE AMENDMENT/FIRE LANE SIGNAGE REQUIREMENTS C. Amendment, Ordinance, City Code Chapter 10, Fire Lane Signage Requirements--An ordinance amendment to Chapter 10, Section 10.40, regarding Minnesota Uniform Fire Code, Subdivision 6, Fire Lane Signage Requirements has been reviewed by all departments and is presented to the Council with the recommendation for approval. (Subdivision 6 is a new subdivision.) A copy of the ordinance wit suggested amendments is included for the Council's information on pagest4through (J ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny an ordinance amendment to City Code Chapter 10, Section 10.40, regarding Minnesota Uniform Fire Code, Subdivision 6, Fire Lane Signage Requirements. l q' ' ORDINANCE NO. 2ND SERIES AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EAGAN, MINNESOTA, AMENDING EAGAN CITY CODE CHAPTER TEN ENTITLED "PUBLIC PROTECTION, CRIMES AND OFFENSES" BY AMENDING SECTION 10. 40 REGARDING MINNESOTA UNIFORM FIRE CODE; AND BY ADOPTING BY REFERENCE EAGAN CITY CODE CHAPTER 1 AND SECTION 10. 99 . The City Council of the City of Eagan does ordain: Section 1 . Eagan City Code Chapter Ten is hereby amended by adding Section 10. 40 , subd. 6, to read as follows: Subd. 6. Fire Lane Signage Requirements. A. Purpose. The purpose of this subdivision is to create a uniformity in fire lane signage throughout the City thereby furthering the prevention and control of fires and fire hazards . B. Standards . All fire lanes on private and public property as designated and approved by the fire chief shall be marked by signage in accordance with the following standards: a . The sign plate shall be 12 x 18 inches; b. The sign plate shall be made of aluminum and shall have red lettering on a white 3M or equal engineers' grade reflective sheeting; c. The sign shall only read: No Parking Fire Lane d. A sign shall be posted at each end of the fire lane and at every 100 foot interval along the fire lane; e. The sign shall face the direction of travel; f . The post on which the sign is attached shall be set back at least two (2 ) feet but not more than three (3) feet from the curb or driving surface; and CC)\ g. The bottom of the sign plate shall be at least seven (7) feet above the ground. h. The sign post and its foundation and sign mountings shall be so constructed as to hold signs in a proper and permanent position, to resist swaying in the wind or displacement by vandalism. Section 2 . Eagan City Code Chapter 1 entitled "General Provisions and Definitions Applicable to the Entire City Code Including 'Penalty for Violation'" and Section 10. 99, entitled "Violation a Misdemeanor" are hereby adopted in their entirety by reference as though repeated verbatim. Section 3 . Effective Date. This ordinance shall take effect upon its adoption and publication according to law. ATTEST: CITY OF EAGAN City Council By: E. J. VanOverbeke By: Thomas A. Egan Its: Clerk Its: Mayor Date Ordinance Adopted: Date Ordinance Published in the Legal Newspaper: Agenda Information Memo May 4, 1993 City Council Meeting SPECIAL USE PERMIT/TARGET/TEMPORARY GREEN HOUSE D. Special Use Permit, Target Store, to Allow Temporary Outdoor Bedding Plant Sales at 2000 Cliff Lake Road (Lot 3, Block 1, Cliff Lake Centre)--An application has been received of Target stores for a special use permit to allow temporary outdoor storage and sales of greenhouse products at the store's location in Cliff Lake Centre. Additional information regarding this application is covered in the staff report which is enclosed on pages,/1. through jfor your review. As noted in the graphic attached to the report, the temporary greenhouse will be located south and west of the main entrance of the Target store on the southernmost side of its parking lot. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny a special use pei mit for target stores for temporary outdoor storage and sales of greenhouse plants at 2000 Cliff Lake Road as presented. SUBJECT: SPECIAL USE PERMIT APPLICANT: TARGET STORES LOCATION: LOT 3, BLOCK 1, CLIFF LAKE CENTRE EXISTING ZONING: CSC (COMMUNITY SHOPPING CENTER) DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: MAY 4, 1993 DATE OF REPORT: APRIL 29, 1993 COMPILED BY: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT APPLICATION SUMMARY: An application has been submitted requesting a Special Use Permit to allow a temporary greenhouse located at 2000 Cliff Lake Road. PROPOSAL/COMMENTS: Holasek Greenhouse of Chanhassen will be constructing the hoop-framed 22' x 44' greenhouse. Target will be locating this in the SE corner of their parking lot, taking up 4.5 parking stalls. Target would like to commence May 8, 1993 and the sale would last through June 12, 1993; the greenhouse would be completely removed by June 19, 1993. Target employees will be at the sale site throughout the duration of the sale. If approved, this Special Use Permit shall be subject to the following conditions: 1. This permit is temporary and shall be valid from May 8, 1993 - June 19, 1993. 2. The permit shall be subject to all applicable Code requirements. \ILLL.\/) O 2 Q — _k.- I/ U „„. c ; k m caN :ex "" f-"^'� +r"r'+f• - ...s-..+ �� fie/'+- ' _ MEADOM2 AND I �¢� ,, :Air / Wal 1 sw a 9 lj _ 1-- , ,�®i l(/' PN A :MEP. •KI `V C) d (3 ■ . ,i1' IQ RAl1N WG 1 -54 i _ ' v 0 ib �rR'ETTLE + a� �. SENJ , , t fD' PAEY/' / 1 N E ism o �lvi li'Villi . / C „FA a+ — EEE333 lll/// 1993Sre�e�Map I &)OuLb Q vir& 4 •tr ki • S 005 iv sell I,lams Inst•k pt•t&h t- i,trt, I P%*s}�c E-2D 1 (SLAWD. j I =S�-AwDI I =SLAND 1 ■ i TY1 kill) BUILDING LA OD StAKD R 1 Submitted by Target Store a X93 Agenda Information Memo May 4, 1993 City Council Meeting SPECIAL USE PERMIT/MARVIN SMITH/OUTDOOR SALES E. Special Use Permit, Marvin Smith & Son, Inc., to Allow Temporary Outdoor Sales at 3380 Highway 149 South (Lot 2,Block 1,Gopher Eagan Industrial Park Second Addition)-- An application has been received of Marvin Smith & Son, Inc., to allow temporary outdoor sales associated with a tent sale at the above-referenced address. The tent would be located immediately in front of Smitty's Outlet Store which is associated with the business. For additional information with respect to this application, please refer to mmunity Development Department staff report which is enclosed on pages `ff and /5 for your review. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny a special use permit for Marvin Smith & Son, Inc., to allow temporary outdoor sales at 3380 Highway 149 South. / f/ SUBJECT: SPECIAL USE PERMIT APPLICANT: MARVIN SMITH & SONS INC LOCATION: SE 1/4 SECTION 12 EXISTING ZONING: 11 (LIMITED INDUSTRIAL) DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: MAY 4, 1993 DATE OF REPORT: APRIL 27, 1993 COMPILED BY: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT APPLICATION SUMMARY: An application has been submitted requesting a Special Use Permit to allow temporary outdoor sales on Lot 2, Block 1, Gopher Eagan Industrial Park 2nd Addition. The site is located on Kutoff Court at the northeast corner of the intersection of Yankee Doodle Road and Highway 149. COMMENTS: For the second year in a row, the applicant is proposing a "tent" sale to promote Smittys Outlet Store. The wholesaler/importer has proposed erecting a 20'x 50' party-style tent on the southern driveway of their property. The sale will run from June 16 through 19, 9:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. daily. The applicant is requesting to erect the tent a week early to air it out and floor plan the merchandise. Customer parking will occur on the north side of the building. Just as last year, the applicant will provide the following: 1) No smoking will be allowed on the grounds or in the building or tent. 2) After-hours security will be provided. 3) The tent shall be removed promptly after the sale is over. If approved, this Special Use Permit shall be subject to the following conditions: 1) This Special Use Permit is temporary and shall be valid from June 16 through 19, 1993. 2) Set-up shall not take place prior to June 9, 1993. 3) The tent shall be removed no later than June 22, 1993. 4) The permit shall be subject to all applicable City policies and ordinances. `1 ` ° 5 - S . 111 @ffiate.-"4 NW M. IMIIIIIMM ••••,••••X:.....•-....,..•.. • ••.••••,,,,..,...,....•L....•Jr....,4■t'.•:•■•••)..,..•GIP)*.....7•4.,awes.:•,),••J''.,.."Or.41.••^N q,..........,,,,,.....-N,ylri ch,.•••1..`,..14,•,...1:::••..1.t'• ..,...,..••,0• •;.,......... r•-- tic ■ l ' 1314 i 4* 1 L7/4 1?lb-NM , ,, ... I . , 411, 7C is -r -46 . z -I .30 41t4 Iri i / ://1/2//,/ izzi /../ // 0 kA f44"7" ''' • .o G V cc• c''' , . ...... f -I / / 4. /'... I de; C ." . ...iv. , "4) fo 0 ; I 1 ' / tr / , • 1„......t 7.... cp •/// /./ / . / 1/ • . . . .. ...) ...„. . • ‹. > A„i„A3p,rd a. .... ._ ..._. _.„-..--_-___—_.-4,..."....."■L•Ao--7••1•• ••;•-•0••41.6...Wa...K e.41,4,44•"*".1••...011."*.•••••■••),,./A 10",411./.....-T ct.x....71'*ZA7 f, .■t,A AO•U.;••• boDi,t. R a /q(Lo Agenda Information Memo May 4, 1993 City Council Meeting CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT/AAGARD ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES OUTDOOR STORAGE F. Conditional Use Permit, Aagard Environmental Services, to Allow Outdoor Storage on Lot 8, Block 1, Sibley Terminal Industrial Park Located along the West Side of Terminal Drive in the SE 1/4 of Sec 8--At its meeting of April 27, 1993, the Advisory Planning Commission considered a conditional use permit application from Aagard Environmental Services to allow outdoor storage of roll-off containers associated with its refuse business. With additional information with respect to this item, please refer the Community Development Department staff report which is enclosed on pages j 3 through 1 for your review. As noted in the staff report, this is the former location of Nitty Disposal which had received a temporary conditional use permit for the outdoor storage of recycling materials contingent upon proof of financial hardship relative to conditions of that permit. This application concerns containers rather than recyclable materials and, therefore, certain conditions of the previous permit were not applied to this one. Also enclosed on pages 4�through e the Advisory Planning Commission minutes relative to this item. Please note t APC is recommending approval subject to modified conditions as noted in the minutes. For additional information with respect to the changes in the conditions, please refer to the supplemental staff report which is enclosed on page ic 7. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny a conditional use permit for Aagard Environmental Services to allow outdoor storage on Lot 8, Block 1, Sibley Tel iiunal Industrial Park as presented. /a' 7 SUBJECT: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT APPLICANT: AAGARD ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES LOCATION: LOT 8, BLOCK 1, SIBLEY TERMINAL INDUSTRIAL PARK (SE 1/4 SECTION 8) EXISTING ZONING: L-I (LIMITED INDUSTRIAL) DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: APRIL 27, 1993 DATE OF REPORT: APRIL 19, 1993 COMPILED BY: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT APPLICATION SUMMARY: An application has been submitted requesting a Conditional Use Permit to allow outside storage on Lot 8, Block 1, Sibley Terminal Industrial Park. The property is zoned Light Industrial and is located just north of the Yankee Doodle Road and Terminal Dr i%e intersection. BACKGROUND: The site in question was most recently occupied by Nitti Disposal Inc. In December 1991 Nitti Disposal applied for a Conditional Use Permit to allow outside storage. This item was discussed and continued a number of times until mid-1992. At this ti r e.�Nitti Disposal was granted a six-month Conditional Use Permit to allow City staff and N:::i to work on possible solutions for enclosing the applicant's recyclable storage area. Prior to the expiration of the six-month Conditional Use Permit, Nitti Disposal was bought cut by BFI and the property - was vacated. Also, the three-sided concrete block recyclable storage area was removed. Early this year, Aagard Environmental Service purchased the propertm and they have begun moving their operation from St. Paul to the Eagan facility. COMMENTS: According to the applicant, Aagard is strictly a commercial refuse hauler so they wil: not handle recyclables on site. Also, the majority of their on-site operations will take place within the existing building. The outside storage requested pertains to the storage of roll off containers, delivery inventory storage, and an inventory rehabilitation area. Although it is not the applicant's intent, hazardous waste shall not be allowed at this site and all material brought to and from the site shall be covered while being transported. The proposed operation shall comply with all federal, state, and county guidelines. if GRADING/DRAINAGE/EROSION CONTROL: Lot 8 of Block 1 of Sibley Terminal Industrial Park has been graded to serve the building and parking lots on the site. The south half along Terminal Drive which contains the building and bituminous parking lots has a steep slope that drains to the street. The north half of the site which contains the gravel parking lot is fairly flat. The Cite has a public 21" storm sewer line along the north edge and a 15" storm sewer line along the east edge of Lot 8. The storm sewer lines that serve this area drain to Pond CP-8, which is a Class VII Stormwater Basin in the City's Water Quality Management Plan. Pond CP-8 is a designated ponding area in the City's Comprehensive Storm Drainage Plan and the pond is located on City owned property. The drainage from the site that will be conveyed to the City's storm sewer should be monitored to see how much debris from the recycling center washes into the City's storm sewer. The runoff from the site can carry leaves, paper and other debris to the City's storm sewer and the debris can plug up the storm sewer and degrade the water quality of the downstream ponds. The design of the upgraded parking lot shall prevent debris from the recycling center from washing into the City storm sewer. Also, during the upgrading of the parking lot, the development will be responsible for installing and maintaining erosion control measures in accordance with the Cit 's Erosion/Sediment Control Manual Standards. UTILITIES: A 9' sanitary sewer and a 12" trunk water main are located in Terminal Drive and these lines provide service to the existing building. The existing hydrant located along the south edge of Lot 8 provides fire protection to the existing building. STREETS1.ACCESS/CIRCULATION: The access to Lot 8 is off of Terminal Drive from two existing driveway openings. City staff recommends that the entire parking lot be upgraded to include concrete curb and gutter around the outside perimeter of the lot to control drainage and to define the limits of where vehicles and storage bins will be stored. Also. the parking lot shall be upgraded to current City standards by constructing a bituminous or concrete surface over the entire lot. FINANCIAL OBLIGATION - 8-CU-11.3.93 Lot 8, Block 1, Sibley Terminal Industrial Park Based upon the study of the financial obligations collected in the past and the uses proposed for the property, the following charges are proposed. The charges are computed using the City's existing fee schedule and connections proposed to be made to the City's utility system based on the submitted plans. Improvement Use Rate Quantity Amount None There are no pending assessments on the property. The levied assessments are paid. ( P9 If approved, this Conditional Use Permit shall be subject to the following conditions: 1. All material brought to and from the site shall be covered while being transported. 2. No hazardous waste shall be allowed on site. 3. All federal, state, and county guidelines shall be met. 4. City of Eagan approval is subject to approval by the Metropolitan Pollution Control Agency and Dakota County. 5. The applicant shall provide written documentation to the City of MPCA and Dakota County approval. 6. The Conditional Use Permit shall be recorded with the Dakota County Recorder within thin 60 days of approval with documentation provided to the City. 7. This Conditional Use Permit shall be subject to all other applicable City ordinances. S. A detailed grading. drainage, erosion and sediment control plan must be prepared in accordance with current City standards and approved by staff prior to issuance of a grading permit or building permit. 9. The storm sewer layout for this site shall be designed in accordance with the Cir 's Stormwater Management Plan and Water Quality Management Plan. 10. Current City Code requires that parking lots shall be surfaced with bituminous or concrete and the edge of the parking lot shall be constructed with a concrete curb and gutter to contain all vehicles and to convey surface water runoff to the proposed storm sewer. The design of the upgraded parking lot shall prevent debris from the recycling center from washing into the City storm sewer. q.6.7 t - A �NN ' � dye - * �� - *- - • — r D o -,,/ t. r o ii- 5 / / > / Y ��� _ 4 N ,`� �' ,,pp �� ' Li 4 N -P ce ,V• ,, N ` N ti/ v � 7 e. �V 1 o �� y� r \ r \' `L / 1 N y 0 \`� �•:„.. ,., J- 4- O _ i / ,, t r , ,.. ..., .....,...., . . . , _ , ,, \ � �'� t H p,. ,....... • �) , ......., � 0 W ill N /'O - . c .� .ti tom_ =� � ^ - Z � � ��� 0 v r '�-v^ N /q.1 . . . , . — —• . - -- • - - t t 7! - — ton O 0-Si1 i ■ I ' P ' I 1 V .7) l ,,.. .'■ - — _,1. r.‘,•I. .-_--_._.•,..-_. - :i i m•I •.7!,.I:;;f z/! _ ',.74 1...•7'.I E . -. 1 I I I,'. , . • -, ,,,: _• , ._. .z ., .. t .. - I •/' •.1 f -._ __ i - -2; . , --- "I" .: ----------------------_'_-2 r 1 I I . • r, , ,.. . ! - - h • ■ . . t , , I - , • -. • ... _ 4 E- -, _--- --..,-- • -4.,81 i - , ..---.. ,,, , I I A ,-' '_ -, •—, + ' ' , .,; , ■, '-s I 1—.117 1 ' --- - , — - 1 : -- ---- ....._ -- — - I ? : - ____ _-- 2----___ ___ ____ ___ _ . r < •E c,.., :::■',' ..". ,t.. .."" ''''' ' ..".. "."'. ' ." '. ■ I ' 1 ...... ,. .. ,.. .. . . . — _ --- , , ''. ---- ! ""•" " '''' ..7,..- EA" V.,..,... A 1 -- i L.. I. r: oc •,,E,_E •...,., ,•,...•■•• •••*,, --. ., 1 i s• ;..., MN ,-.A Si,I.t,•.......,... l■ .-...*?'-`-=-•■—"..e;.''.---- ---- t.4. i 3eE -.■13.•..0...74:....IVO: ...■••■-- ,...----- 111111 P r 's - / i D c 0_0\...\ t4 °_ . -, CP-9 ea. L,'."--=" CP-9.2 i " ` -=•8570 ' ` .. 702.Q I-'-^"1�^ / / C-j i CP-9.1 �7 ii 66.0 ' U i,i� - 307 C-o i ':c856 0 , 11 �/ C g'� 662.0- ( .. /7 7�9,r - , ■ , _ e'q1' - •r ''iv _ " ., ''': ;, �s.-4� 2i �„' �_ ��_�— �} _ 1 — -e ;1�� a C P-3 D �' r� ;;I -, 841 9 ../ . ., i �i .'1"-1iL`" FC.x F".;i1n C-a it , --� �N ?a P-10 c —' - ti 00 E 1--r--' �P-' ` 79+0.0 �''�1- yt,.;, 7E5 0 823.5 -_ . -76.9.4 / • r't'//�`62 9.7 's' - _ ` `,n _..,,,,' 40 C.g A r v / 1S� r4— - v 7 CP- 12 �� ,' GP^I• 826 5 825 0 y 629.6 ^ ;, - - 6297. ' ...-... -- \ ��, c ---8 O , 27 - 1 y r' a. P d 'C I7 d e 2a ('\ �', — 4/ ' PROJECT SITE FIGURE No. 17 STORM SEWER LAYOUT MAP CITY OF EAGAN Page 12 /EAGAN ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES APRIL 27 , 1993 CONDITIONAL VSE PERMIT - AAGARD ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES Chairman Voracek opened the next public hearing of the evening regarding a Conditional Use Permit to allow outdoor storage on Lot 8 , Block 1 , Sibley Terminal Industrial Park located along the west side of Terminal Drive in the SE 1/4 of Section 8 . City Planner Sturm stated that in mid-1992 Nitti Disposal was granted a six-month Conditional Use Permit to allow outdoor storage on this site . Since then Nitti Disposal has vacated the site and Aagard Environmental Service purchased the property. He mentioned that Aagard Environmental Service will not handle recyclables on this site . Tin Herman , the applicant , stated that he would like to clarify a few of the proposed conditions . Regarding condition #2 , which states that no hazardous waste shall be allowed on site, he mentioned that a new state law defines hazardous waste to include fluorescent tubes , which he intends to handle . Regarding condition #10 , which requires the parking lot to be surfaced with bituminous or concrete , Mr. Herman agrees to this condition, however , needs some time in which to dc this . He stated that the paving could be accomplished by the end of 1995 . Mr . Herman commented that he cannot pave to the storm drainage system as the City is requesting because that is on his neighbor ' s property. He commented that he has no plan to handle recyclables on this site at the current time, however , in the future the possibility exists . Mr. Herman further stated that his intent is to have a good relationship with the City and is looking forward to doing business in the City of Eagan. City Planner Sturm commented that if the applicant wished to recycle in the future , the Conditional Use Permit would have to be revised . Member Miller stated that he could only approve this application if all the conditions stay as presented. He requested that a condition be added which prohibits the applicant from handling recyclables . Member Merkley suggested that condition #10 have a time limit attached to it . After discussion it was decided that the paving of the parking lot must be accomplished by the end of 1995 . Page 13/EAGAN ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES APRIL 27 , 1993 Mr. Herman stated that condition #2 was impossible to comply with because many items that he uses in the course of business would be considered hazardous waste, i . e. paint . City Planner Sturm commented that this was not the intent of condition $2 . After discussion Member Merkley suggested that City staff work with the applicant on the wording of condition #2 before the City Council meeting. Chairman Voracek mentioned that anything used in the normal course of business should not be considered hazardous waste. Hey: moved , Isberg seconded , the motion to approve a Conditional Use Permit to allow outdoor storage on Lot 8 , Block 1 , Sibley Terminal :ndustrial Park located along the west side of Terminal Drive in the SE 1/4 cf Section 8 , subject to the following conditions : 1 . All material brought to and from the site shall be covered while being transported. 2 . No hazardous waste shall be allowed on site. This does not include items used in the course of business . 3 . All federal , state , and county guidelines shall be met . 4 . City of Eagan approval is subject to approval by the Metropolitan Pollution Control Agency and Dakota County. 5 . The applicant shall provide written documentation to the City of MPCA and Dakota County approval . 6 . The Conditional Use Permit shall be recorded with the Dakota County Recorder within 60 days of approval with documentation provided to the City. 7 . This Conditional Use Permit shall be subject to all other applicable City ordinances. 8 . A detailed grading, drainage, erosion and sediment control plan must be prepared in accordance with current City standards and approved by staff prior to issuance of a grading permit or building permit. 9 . The storm sewer layout for this site shall be designed in accordance with the City's Stormwater Management Plan and Water Quality Management Plan. ( 9 Page 14 /EAGAN ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES APRIL 27 , 1993 10 . Current City Code requires that parking lots shall be surfaced with bituminous or concrete and the edge of the parking lot shall be constructed with a concrete curb and gutter to contain all vehicles and to convey surface water runoff to the proposed storm sewer. This shall be accomplished by the end of 1995 . 11 . The design of the upgraded parking lot shall prevent debris from the recycling center from washing into the City storm sewer . 12 . Handling of recyclables is not permitted. All present voted in favor . Chairman Voracek requested that the boundaries of the parking lot for this application be defined. ¢''1,.. MEMO _city of eagan TO: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES ACTING COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR HOHENSTEIN FROM: CITY PLANNER STURM DATE: APRIL 29, 1993 SUBJECT: AAGARD CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT At the April 27 Advisory Planning Commission meeting, the Conditional Use Permit for Aagard Environmental Services allowing outdoor storage of refuse products and trucks was approved unanimously. There were no public comments on this item. The site is located along the west side of Terminal Drive. In mid-1992, Nitti Disposal was granted a six-month Conditional Use Permit for outdoor storage of recycling materials, but they were bought out by BFI and have since moved off the site. Aagard has purchased this property. The applicant requested that Condition #2 prohibiting hazardous waste be amended to read: 2. No hazardous waste shall be allowed on-site. This does not include items used in the course of business. Condition #10 regarding the r a e u adm of the parking lot/storage area was amended 9 9 upgrading P 9 allowing until the end of 1995 for that to occur. The applicant agrees with the condition, only he felt financially they wouldn't be able to comply until at least 1994; however, it is their intent to put in an improved parking lot with curb and gutter as soon as possible. Condition #12 was added to read: 12. Handling of recyclables is not permitted. If you would like additional information, please contact me. City Planner JS/js Agenda Information Memo May 4, 1993 City Council Meeting COMPREHENSIVE GUIDE PLAN AMENDMENT/REZONING/ CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT/TOTAL PETROLEUM G. Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment,Total Petroleum,from RB (Roadside Business) to CSC (Community Shopping Center), a Rezoning of Approximately 2.1 Acres from RB to CSC, and a Conditional Use Permit to Allow Outdoor Storage Located Along the South Side of Cliff Road, East of Rahncliff Road in the Northwest Quarter of Section 32--At its meeting of April 27, 1993, the Advisory Planning Commission considered separate applications for a comprehensive guide plan amendment, rezoning and conditional use permit as outlined above for the Total Petroleum location at the intersection of Cliff and Rahncliff Roads. The applicant has requested the amendment and rezoning to bring the facility into a land use designation which will permit the sale of 3.2 beer. The roadside business zoning for this parcel is the remainder of a zoning district which was replaced by the Rahncliff PD. The comp guide amendment and rezoning would be consistent with surrounding zonings in the same area. At the time of this application, Total Mart was notified of the City's outside storage requirement and submitted an application for a conditional use permit for the outside storage of water softener salt and firewood. The conditional use permit application is coincidental to the guide plan amendment and rezoning applications and is not directly related to them. They are merely being processed simultaneously. For additional information with respect to this item, please refer to the Co unity Development Department staff re o hich is enclosed on pages ethrough yr your review. Also enclosed on page throughre the Advisory Planning Commission minutes relative to this item. ote that the APC is recommending approval of the comp guide amendment and rezoning and denial of the conditional use permit for the reasons noted. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny: 1) a comprehen- sive guide plan amendment for Total Petroleum from RB (Roadside Business) to CSC (Community Shopping Center), 2) a rezoning of approximately 2.1 acres from RB to CSC and 3) a conditional use permit to allow outdoor storage located along the south side of Cliff Road, east of Rahncliff Road as presented. SUBJECT: COMPREHENSIVE GUIDE PLAN AMENDMENT, REZONING, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT APPLICANT: TOTAL PETROLEUM LOCATION: LOT 1, BLOCK 1, RAHNCLIFF 1ST ADDITION EXISTING ZONING: RB (ROADSIDE BUSINESS) DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: APRIL 27, 1993 DATE OF REPORT: APRIL 21, 1993 COMPILED BY: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT APPLICATION SUMMARY: Separate applications have been submitted requesting a Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment changing the land use from RB (Roadside Business) to CSC (Community Shopping Center), a Rezoning of approximately 2.1 acres from RB to CSC and a Conditional Use Permit to allow outdoor storage on Lot 1, Block 1, Rahncliff 1s: Addition. The site is located along the south side of Cliff Road east of Rahncliff Road. BACKGROUND: Earlier this year. the applicants wanted to acquire a liquor license to sell off-sell 3.2 beer at the Total Mart gas station, however Roadside Business districts do not all w sale of any type of liquor, 3.2 beer, or wine as either a permitted use or through the coed::ional use permit process. As a result, the Rezoning and Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendments became the vehicle to allow this potential use. All of the businesses within the auto strip center support the rezoning request. '� N Mart Use COMMENTS:TS: Tonal . lart is also requesting a Conditional Lse Permit to allow outside 9 g storage of water softener salt and firewood. The applicant is proposing to store the merchandise in a 10' wide area on the front sidewalk of the building. The required storage enclosure will be open in front and on top. The building has an existing 6' overhang and Total Mart would like to use the existing storefront as the rear of the enclosure and construct two 4. x 3' contour concrete block sidewalls on the front sidewalk which is 7' wide. This request meets all outdoor storage standard requirements except for the proposed location. Outside storage is not allowed to encroach into any established front building setback area which is measured from the building foundation and the enclosure is not allowed to interfere with any pedestrian movement. This enclosure will occupy 4' of the 7' wide sidewalk in front of the store. The landscaping on site does not appear to have been maintained with any regularity and as shop;n on the attached approved landscape plan, should be brought up to current standards by removing and replacing any dead, or dying plant material throughout Lot 1, Block 1. Rahncliff 1st Addition. FINA.NCLAL OBLIGATION - 32-CU-12-4-93 Lot 1, Block 1, Rahncliff 1st Based upon the study of the financial obligations collected in the past and the uses proposed for the property, the following charges are proposed. The charges are computed using the C:r'\ s existing fee schedule and connections proposed to be made to the City's utility system based on the submitted plans. Improvement Use Rate Quantity Amount None There are pending assessments totaling 520,918 for Project 609 on the parcels or units for h.:h the condi:iona use permit is requested. If approved, this Conditional Use Permit shall be subject to the following: 1. The Conditional Use Permit shall be recorded with the Dakota County Recorder within 60 days of approval with documentation provided to the City. 2. Outside storage shall be limited to water softener salt and firewood. 3. The storage area shall be relocated outside of the established front building setback. 4. All dead and damaged planting material shall be removed and replaced throughout Lot 1, Block 1, Rahncliff 1st Addition. � a0 ■■■■■1=MMIMIMIll — . 5 0.,.42'3t4-3E—;°" ,R,.4 1-1• . —4.-----'',..—.,--'--■ , 24 0-6 1-- .-•,$—,4.1',7-/3—0‹-:-,r,•*-o.-,.:8.- - I r .;-.. :, -• r4. -•- 1 ••-.,1,• t .. - .r-t .. ' c '- a -:::' 7, - '•_• : .- : . ..(-); , - O • -..•, •. , ,c t 3 r7 Cil !'' :. t.• % t.d, Z "i.q , ' ' ' z !' i ° ? ; h ti r•• •••,i s - sn s,=3 `• •--.• , a 5... , •;-••.-- g r ; CO-; o • ._ •", -, - -;;71-. . . --, : = • , i `",, !-- • ,. -, 2 ". ' 7.: . , n, ' -.1)",) :.r- .1) a .t. . r- • . _ o .",1.-. . - - o = ;o ■-..• t * (-=, ' -• ul - : , „ ; •.,,:: ., . , _, r... --, s 7 '• • ' •. ■• 7 .1. r) • : 7 , . 0 ' • •„ ,.7 : (..)I ••• i 2 ..i 0 - '' it • ,',,..'• ..'. rt . i 0 ;.. c ,•••• : - ..., . (...) .,. z It Z \\ •• • • 1 ‘" C) • ---••••'„ • • : .;4••• .,2, 1 . i - \• M .... •„ it '7, •• A •• . •,.•07 r t1.10 .. • '','..'''. ' ' ,, 1' t. to •, .., .4.,• -' -,, . '1 -' C) > 'i IS'• . ,„ '. „„_ ,/ •'-'..._ .4. „....lig., '-'----. _ _____, _ .-:. ....1 e .1". 0';‘‘, e‘ ""•-s., •.2 -.., 4.. '‘.•■• ■ s:, ', ... .. c..‘ -■• . -••,• •..00..••,,.- .1. • •.!, :•",. ' 4.. . :_ •• --' ./ ' , . ..=..e. .....,. .. ,' 46,' 'A ° ••••••7..,...7A"'••*it•0*,.A .•• ,,tr.." • JD (•• ,' •-- _2_ __ ,0 C' I i %t! '''■.' :••., ;7 2 • 0 ....e . ' t! i!; 4A, •- - Z . ;, •. - •-•..., Is o.:7 , 0 L____— •(..,. 'I t ..- _,, ,1 • :.' n1 P "... i.!: , • - - - ' • _ -- . ^. 0 • ‘.0 t z .4 -- •... - ---.__,..„. ,•:, .. *. ...: ,,s,•• ."2 E V , • , 2,..• t;e '....7 ; , .....t________--■---Z , . 06.. ----4.-`' Z6' ..,.3, -;-. _:•••". i .., . II's"( , =,,. ,, •,.- k a", 1 g g . .., , — ,,,_, -., 2 ----, 0 C - 1-f 2 0 ;., '. :' b ., e I•••••• ,5 =; o ' . 7 ••••2•• t 2; ,• ._ :i; ' :-.7. „ -••.i a > _,,:.,-, .., C. . _ a;' -------7-- : i !1- ,T.,.T, , a!• • C . ',•• e-; Jt• <•••••,.:.-' ...,'...7 D ; :sc. :4 ;' ' ;C.' i . ;:i' • • ..;.• C R i 2 ; ...: •-t A -, •• :•. a" •::i, ; '---a .7: cr, -•. - :. c„. -4 . •. ", 4 Ch c.r1 ::i • n• .., ••''.1 0,SIC.il i .. t ...- ' - ' f ::7, ''`-..•t- = . :'3 C 4 '' : '.-2 -.• - .-..i Ti.'; t-, •:-;i,t i '2 _ 1-=t 4 •7-7 F.z7. R .;- s:,_;_ • -t,--._ ?.-.7.'-- - -?-,, , .. .:-.: --•• - s :, .-.-,'• ..7.::: - --*• -- —. fiiriii- --. -,,,e . ..... .4.. ...... . o • , - • .., ' • t. t ^. . i? '■ '1' t t...,t - t f-- _s. a-'1!!., 1,• 1 ..C •-- -. :.7.`E ••• --,--.. ...'. ;, - t r.:.-- " - r:;, ' • f. :2; :- s-. ,_ -. . s.. - . _ ;= ; ; !; ;- !,!•7-'!. >-,. ;: 7 -; > - -- ' -• .,.--2 •-•. . ;-; ...:. .7.1 r•.I• -•■• :7 i 7 •C M. `":• - • — • 1. -..il: ! -• :-_- z 1 1,57'''5 '- .:',"•'4'4 T. .--- 7 '\••t_j:.:' -• - M i:=: : -•.■:. 7- ::: '77' i!: •* 7 . •2 .: < Ul i- ;; Ii '-e'`;•; I.' :7;2.f.- 3.,;„ ni :. 7.., .4-.•• ;7.;.-4 •a . '‘'. 7 -- - •• • - -" _ : ! kwil i • ' - 13. --• 7 , , .• ". •2,: ;•. ..; - =‘ •'._ _ "';: „ ?•z - a — ,...1.- -:'- ',•:.;'.!.: •7.-; ..i - 1r gl- G" -, ,_ _ • . _ .. E. - ..4. ' A : : `,-: _ - - ... Z CI v„ 00 — _ v. -- E. 9 V y _ T.' p ",,0 \'."' "' °o°-• N 0•42'53"W A 's •yc� ti— 4000- ,-2 N 0°42'53"W 159.67 --� r — \ { R:', - fIN _•/ 1 COMMON ELEMENT __ • I - °y y• " ; -H 56 3C � I 1,/ ! -7 ► — s V � r P. S I T I COMMON E A _ l to : C cr <__ IIZ + E 1 8 i f z � ' - C) s i i � w ?� I I 0 o I - — p o gg �ja I I f o I � ii a' _J ,� f, : = v Z -' ) ` I p \' :i -,m i c � £� L_ , - t. �� y g 8� /ig m F =t ° • 2 t .. I I ' \J Z 14•• _J � 0 1 1V 2 ,' i 2-12 ■-. -I Z I L / I -- yy V, ID CI•6,ywi it �1��1M—�1^^• V I / �� „,± 't" �• •o.�,• — _ _� it ' •33'32"E 233.07 -- S 3 , t? 1 li w 7, I — • P r 11. 15 r : f l'L _...j..._��:1 ' --41. 11m..7. ..... ..'' i M _ 1-11-____.•— µ11M 110AO _ 1 • 0 K � • promdlIS .. ,' — VIP S Ili , iiii ' 1 ••frviRo. ; ,:v ...., -:, 1 :.,;_ �,,,.. I1H If eve_ . ...„.Is. A 11,........0.1:-: -N. 1 Il ! L. L. ! 1 7,7 vi.t 1 .i _I ; I 1 L. i; j ii i1 Pil Ir . I , es...l. ;ilii � ii ji., I r , i =1i I 1 N ' ,1 ) . . 1 or•1 til . , _ II ill t ' liiiii '1.: i —1 i '.i I..' [ — 111 4 i . III x . • pp r m � ✓ ,1 ;st } o :11111P • . // • ' .'4 !lift' X � � � G � ` =� — � � � • 111 it is i Il -j ai. ( r II 4 II co l• i . rd . I • ��1 �' 1 i —1 yl • > , 1 . 1 if o , :It , fEi I,4i ' i I I 2 t .-- \ gt4P.,p, - • „op+ _ _,_ , . ., ......,„, z : . .1,,■.-2,-.24 -..s.rilW- 7......a.ogariam. -,,ar,t'!,..„,jaigjor. sr- -+-1 MT ... i 5._______1:17—":31 D c HI 11 t 1 o I' + Ir 0 . , 1 i 1 > ,o II 1 ii > ;I ' 1 1, I i 0) _ 11AMN UfF 1ST ADO. - LOT 1, K. �' z , , i ; ; t ••.•--- =_-= James R. Hill, inc ;, e_ I 1 MAL onAOu•c • tPIoS10N O• OL ►La =r - t -1 • i 1. ►i RANNLAS/ENGWEERS/SuRVEtOF' r a Aritural � 411411T ' el' ....- - Arrr• ,-, ' - . 1 ?,,'' `,1 :7 ,.. .2 f-;:, Y.'' 21 ':.‘ 4' // / / / I : 71 / -,141 / ,/ I .* 1 C7 ' f...+5• ' 0 i C.,C 1.• I 1,C—..!$ 1 i I 1 Ili\ ! r I DO rT 0 ! ;!----■,__i% 1 >(...i tp - -9, /0 r n . -- , .. .. :ID .R 7„.... ® , D , • ,,1 1 1.- 1 ; 1 ! -----"! — z cr, 4. . I • • , 1, A ■ 7 ; 1 6.0:7• 1 &CC... i! li ____, _ , ..___ 1, 6 , •LA-1,.../ 1 ..A.A,.,, 1, 1 5 -4 1. S1...o 1 cve 1../ I, -.,,,. 0 ,k . t. -1 • r , r t,...-- .1,--1.-'r .2 1 ..j,:,-,,-.. AA ,,:',MI rn N ■ : ,-------, C . 1.------J : r) 1----N ,..—N ■ -io,— 1 ., ,......./ ■. F.s . a, ;.. c• • , .. .— . ,.. • CD .1-1) 7-----.1—,k. • - - ,____, I 50. 11 1"--•.',.. 7...)] i j.• r 1: H ,H ; 0 '''.. ,.: . ,, - ,i ;,•,.1, ,. .. o , .._ ; ..;• = ) I ',.f. , n 1 ----/ I ;;:3■. ' 1*.:P,'.. ; ...JO • I ..,A, 0 7---TH ,..c - ‘ •&. :,.. !, ; ‘...,,, ' 1-'*--,, 4..c. 41-'il 4...i,-.- 7 7 _,..=,-, ' ,■,' !' -7----,x o! .,,,,- 1 ' (i.,.. , 2 j. C • t 1 i 4 1 ; I ! 1 ? ,i . CD C77° lc Z . • . - - pi r'l i ! , i, \").-s-/H .4. .•?i I ! r..,,,,,.... "r11 1 t_12:1.c...2j • ..... ,.1 ,A/740 o /Th '44h; F--,--r------; '..\'/ 1, 1.-.-.L I I T 7:0' 1r I c_.c.A.- 1, —_,.. .■,..._... ........„ ...... "r<"— Ar k i ----- . ! , ...:..tr._<.•rt: FR.EF.:ER 1 ' 1 -. 4•1M1.0■■1rW AI . • a °, Cr .. ) •4("-lerl C-C-'%C.A4.4.27.4._. LA...)a L.Oct ,I,.) t.---\ - \,.._. r• 44.4 4 4e r•Nor,r4.11 ii ‘Ye>7-'..\te--, .,-,,4 s.■,._ oc we,A-er.:0-,,,,er soli- a r■J r1atruJc)00, C:;,..4 r te-‘,./ j\•, r- ! S, C;!!! Page 15/EAGAN ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES APRIL 27 , 1993 REZONING - TOTAL PETROLEUM Chairman Voracek opened the next public hearing of the evening regarding a Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment from RB (Roadside Business) to CSC (Community Shopping Center) , a Rezoning of approximately 2 . 1 acres from RB to CSC, and a Conditional Use Permit to allow outdoor storage located along the south side of Cliff Road east of Rahncliff Road in the NW 1/4 of Section 32 . City Planner Sturm stated that the primary purpose of the Comprehensive Guide Plan and Rezoning applications is to allow the applicant to sell off-sale 3 . 2 beer. He mentioned that the. neighboring businesses have agreed to the rezoning. City Planner Sturm stated that the applicant is also requesting a Conditional Use Permit for outdoor storage. He mentioned that the City Council will be reviewing the outdoor storage of propane tanks at a Special Council meeting in the near future. Len Swanson, a representative of the applicant , requested that the conditional use permit issue be left open until the City Council decides on the propane tank issue. Miller moved, Heyl seconded, the motion to approve a Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment from RB (Roadside Business) to CSC (Community Shopping Center) located along the south side of Cliff Road east of Rahncliff Road in the NW 1/4 of Section 32 . All present voted in favor. Miller moved, Heyl seconded, the motion to approve a Rezoning of approximately 2 . 1 acres from RB to CSC located along the south side of Cliff Road east of Rahncliff Road in the NW 1/4 of Section 32 . All present voted in favor. Member Heyl asked the applicant if the location of the proposed enclosure could be moved to meet City Code requirements. Mr. Swanson stated that it could not be moved because the clerks inside the store could not monitor the merchandise if the enclosure was on the side of the building. He also stated that having the merchandise on the front sidewalk is much more convenient for customers . He did not feel that having the enclosure on the front sidewalk would impede pedestrian or vehicular traffic. Page 16/EAGAN ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES APRIL 27 , 1993 Member Miller stated that, in general, the City is not in favor of this type of proposal . He felt that the proposed enclosure would interfere with pedestrian and vehicular movement. Member Merkley stated that he also is not in favor of this application. He stated that it does not meet City Code and that it would interfere with customer traffic and would also encroach into the front building setback area. Merkley moved, Heyl seconded, the motion to deny a Conditional Use Permit to allow any outdoor storage located along the south side of Cliff Road east of Rahncliff Road in the NW 1/4 of Section 32 . All present voted in favor. 0- 0 Agenda Information Memo May 4, 1993 City Council Meeting OFF-SALE BEER LICENSE/TOTAL PETROLEUM H. License, Ofd Sale Beer, Total Petroleum, 2000 Rahncliff--If the previous agenda item regarding the comprehensive guide plan amendment and rezoning for Total Petroleum from RB to CSC was approved, it would be appropriate to consider Total Petroleum's application for an off-sale beer license. The application has been made by Lynn Swanson, who is manager of the Total Service Station located at 2000 Rahncliff Road. The license application has been reviewed by the Eagan Police Department and the Police Department has found no reason to deny this license. A copy of the application is enclosed for the Council's information without page number. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny an off-sale beer license for Total Petroleum at 2000 Rahncliff Road. a �� Agenda Information Memo May 4, 1993 City Council Meeting CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT/YOUNG ADVERTISING/ADVERTISING SIGN I. Conditional User Permit, John J. Young, to Allow an Advertising Sign on Parcel 013-56 Located Along the East Side of Highway 13, North of Diff ley Road in the West Half of Section 19--At its meeting of April 27, 1993, the Advisory Planning Commission considered a conditional use permit application for John J. Young to allow a single-sided billboard advertising sign to be located on the east side of Highway 13, north of Diffley Road. This is one of four applications which the City Council directed be reviewed under the existing ordinance before adoption of the amended ordinance which will cap the number of billboard advertising signs, faces and square footage. The remaining applications together with the ordinance amendment itself will be processed at the second meeting in May at the request of the applicant. For additional information with respect to this application, please refer to the Community Development Department staff report which is epclosed on pagesa through..gel-for your review. Also enclosed on pages:k5througl 'faare the APC minutes relative to this item. Please note that a motion to approve this application failed by a vote of 2 to 4. Also enclosed on pages,?((througllis a supplemental memo from the Community Development Department covering a summary of the billboard history to this point, correspondence from the Cedarvale Management Company and a petition from Cedarvale merchants and owners relative to this matter. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the conditional use permit for John Young to allow an advertising sign on Parcel 013-56 located along the east side of Highway 13, north of Diffley Road as presented. &of SUBJECT: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT APPLICANT: JOHN J. YOUNG LOCATION: NW CORNER OF SW SECTION 19 (P.I.D. #10 01900 013 56) EXISTING ZONING: L-I (LIMITED INDUSTRIAL) DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: APRIL 27, 1993 DATE OF REPORT: APRIL 19, 1993 COMPILED BY: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT APPLICATION SUMMARY: An application has been submitted requesting a Conditional Use Permit to allow a single-sided advertising sign to be located on the east side of State Highway 13 approximately one-third of a mile north of Diffley Road (County Road 30). COMMENTS: The proposed sign would be located on Industrially-zoned property less than 500' from the nearest single family residential dwelling. The proposed sign would measure 10' x 25' (250 sq. ft.) and would be single sided. The proposed sign will not exceed 40' in height, would meet, or exceed all setback requirements and would be lighted with direct halophane lighting. If approved, this Conditional Use Permit shall be subject to the following conditions: 1. The Conditional Use Permit shall be recorded with the Dakota County Recorder within 60 days with documentation provided to the City. 2. The sign shall meet the required 10' setback from the property lines. 3. The sign shall be subject to the one-time sign fee of $2.50/sq. ft. 4. This Conditional Use Permit shall be subject to all other applicable Code requirements. ? FINANCIAL OBLIGATION • 19-CU-5-1-92, John J. Young Based upon the study of the financial obligations collected in the past and the uses proposed for the property, the following charges are proposed. The charges are computed using the City's existing fee schedule and connections proposed to be made to the City's utility system based on the submitted plans. Improvement Use Rate Quantity Amount None fD / 7 , ,, „ ,, , . -- .._ __. , . ___3 .,. t I( fir— — 1 �_-- 1 , , r(,,--; , , ,, i ,/ / / , „ ■ ,,, f, i ,: , L_____ i , ..,- ,>'' - ,/ ,i/ r .a , — � ( [ � i / I � �� tA ,A's i RS I �r 1 ',' 4i �� ,r 4- /.� - Rya - - r7l�° iiiiitirfct/1/ l Alf / � ��/,0l ,% �/ o 1 /'' / i , 0 e ,,i/i , KS\ It I s1. /1 fpm �/ 1•1 2 ILJ_ 1 ' ` 1/ ''•'-., , hIR, d,, ‘{ liI I 1 i o ./,i !1� ( - '�;7 �7 I . 1 %- I a ', 1, r i Y r,1; Ei 1 (1,-r:13 -- ;. "'. -94111e - // i It ' '' i „ / / I ,,) 1 , T 1 ' , / ., (r �' •1 vA i�� �, I il 1 i I / �( I I trao + i1 r �� � � y , ' I( I.I J an iL> \ !! I I I -,�� '„ 11 ,4 I I D i irl l' ' , \ _ i / ��1 !I i I ` {, ' ,ate , i 1 1 , �- i, �/‘ '1 / / 1 .�1 .�Yf� •;/ L 1 1 I 1 11 /l I , - -__i___7_r___ri r_r? . , _ _ _._, ■ 1 35 Ii it 1 i I,� _ -_ 11���1 ;i,1in - — R --- MOM li r -- - � =1e- - .. ._ . . - - - !i' !'!�. - -- - pi 11 1 II II _.• . 1' LOLUw+N LAPvea w■•rr+ ACCIfs ' TO LOw.'!Q REA2 WAb,KwAY 11 150 59. If S,q, r.,c .5,nz le 5,ded L Page 22/EAGAN ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES APRIL 27 , 1993 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT JOHN J. YOUNG Chairman Voracek opened the last public hearing of the evening regarding a Conditional Use Permit to allow an advertising sign on Parcel 013-56 located along the east side of Highway 13 north of Diffley Road in the west 1/2 of Section 19 . City Planner Sturm stated that this billboard would be erected on Highway 13 , approximately one-third of a mile north of Diffley Road. He mentioned that the billboard would be one-sided and the proposed site is rather open. John Young, the applicant, stated that he had heard it commented at a previous City Council meeting that there were concerns with the Cedarvale area. He felt that the Cedarvale area could use a billboard to make people more aware that there are businesses in this area. Mr. Young spoke with the Cedarvale businesses and found that 44 of 46 of the businesses were in approval of the billboard. He stated that Cedarvale businesses would have first priority to rent the billboard and that the billboards would mostly be directional signs. Mr. Young mentioned that he would rent the billboard to Big Top Liquor and similar type businesses. Member Merkley stated that he is generally opposed to billboards , however, he did feel that the Cedarvale area needs some type of help. Member Miller stated that he did not feel one billboard would save the Cedarvale area . He mentioned that the billboard did meet City Code requirements. He was concerned with how the approval of this billboard would add to the "no net gain" policy. Member Isberg felt that access is the main problem with the Cedarvale area . Chairman Voracek stated that one billboard will not rescue Cedarvale and felt that the billboard would stand out against the skyline. He mentioned that some businesses in the Cedarvale area are thriving. Miller moved, Merkley seconded, the motion to approve a Conditional Use Permit to allow an advertising sign on Parcel 013-56 located along the east side of Highway 13 north of Diffley Road in the west 1/2 of Section 19 , subject to the following conditions: (77 /3 Page 23/EAGAN ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES APRIL 27 , 1993 1 . The Conditional Use Permit shall be recorded with the Dakota County Recorder within 60 days with documentation provided to the City. 2 . The sign shall meet the required 10' setback from the property lines . 3 . The sign shall be subject to the one-time sign fee of $2 . 50/sq. ft. 4 . This Conditional Use Permit shall be subject to all other applicable Code requirements. Miller, Merkley voted in favor; Voracek, Gorman, Heyl , Isberg voted against. Motion failed 2-4 . MEMO —city of eagan TO: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES ACTING COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR HOHENSTEIN FROM: CITY PLANNER STURM DATE: APRIL 29, 1993 SUBJECT: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT JOHN YOUNG At the April 27 Advisory Planning Commission meeting, the Conditional Use Permit to allow an advertising sign located along the east side of Highway 13 approximately one- third of a mile north of Diffley Road was not approved. After a presentation by the applicant and discussion by the Commission regarding the sign itself and the Cedarvale area situation, a motion to approve the sign failed 2/4. Since then, the applicant has stated his desire to make another presentation of the merits of a sign to the City Council and discuss some of his personal ideas that he feels would revitalize the Cedarvale area. Attached is a copy of a petition of Cedarvale area merchants, as well as a letter from the Cedarvale mall property manager, both previously submitted and a chronology of the billboard history over the past several years. If you would like additional information, please contact me. Thank-you. City Planner JS/js attach. EAGAN BILLBOARD HISTORY August 1990 - CC approves temporary moratorium on billboards September 1991 - CC votes to retain existing sign ordinance October 1991 - APC recommends denial for Adams billboard request November 1991 - CC denies Adams request March 1992 - CC approves new moratorium on billboards June 1992 - CC organizes Sign Task Force August 1992 - Task Force begins meetings November 1992 - Task Force recommends denial to CC March 1993 - CC approves "no net gain" policy for billboards a � � UMMC Repry to April 23, 1992 John Young 16275 Hudson Avenue Lakeville MN 55044 RE: Billboard Sign to be located in Eagan Dear Mr. Young: We are in receipt of your letter of April 17, 1992. In reference to your proposal to place a billboard sign on Highway 13 between the SuperAmerica station and Cedar Avenue, we are in full support. of your efforts to build the sign. As the City Council always appreciates written evidence of support, we offer this letter to you to present to the City. We believe the City of Eagan is making great strides in helping all of us rejuvenate the Cedarvale Area and we hope they will consider your request for the billboard sign fairly. In addition, we have discussed your billboard sign (location referenced above) , as a possible advertising site for the Cedarvale Mall, and we have decided it is quite desireable for our advertising needs. Therefore, should you get City Council approval to erect the sign, we would be honored indeed to accept your offer of April 17, 1992 to rent the sign. Let us know if we can be of further assistance in your efforts. Sincerely, Lisa Wendt Property Manager CEDARVALE MALL LW/hs 1106 S. Broadway, Box 834 Upper Midwest Management Corporation 18300 Minnetonka Blvd. New Ulm, MN 56073-0834 Deephaven, MN 55391 (507) 359-2004 (612) 475-0072 FAX # (507) 354-1638 ( 7 FAX # (612) 475-0072 (9- TO THE CITY OF EAGAN We the undersigned , support John J . Young' s request for an Outdoor Advertising Devise to support the Cederrvale Business Area. We agree with Mr . Young 's analysis that outdoor advertising can effectively promote, and direct customers to , the Cedervale business area . DATE NAME (Print) SIGNATURE TITLE BUSINESS NAME 4- -92 ►4 7,+7R ,�v �s��.,..,.Z g-to - ,c4A.4.0.4.4- 1 A-9-9z Dale Q 55e ber , e Ai 1A: S./Wt.,— Qir.S- is, a LoPi)4 Mat--1,,? a2n,ti "7/1/2"' /�c i a y r /, 0e/9.1- A /I I/ 0 ; To/A. f /C/ Jot)-(-. G-'tll ) /kf=`: 5 M/ PI r. i 1 , / (,- L Z" LL-- Nf___2____:_2 ,,-t_.„,____/2ro--e---,---:---;__44.e...-CA-e\-t------- -o ----- Ys("))---J-&-:,- J i4/ (i,L. ,-(/ / �1�" ('/u.// (/e/// ��liGc-�j,�'2 4/2 //((e/ sl/l Y 5 !//_- � , 11 isms (),,z-.-424„.nit o_.i.,tf-i.c__.--. 4. -2.....i 1i `z4A- 'I/2 1/4Z Z lam/z, 7/.=_ G/`l GL -✓- ir c7/rdt„,z" a .2 t--. J/ -+-- Y- // )- cam.-,/E- THa" ( fiV ��c S�� CI I y- IL i Z � pct ,,-.c Sc L vv.,- c '- )-- C4 ,,0 k -AZYi 1'2_ -9--la rr _-,)( `(sk I Y r�J 0(I ) ktl/i' - fiZ h/ -1-7 Lit'1:\(`0 k U. /� �/C y CtrkS /9..teE-CIAFIVALE BARBER SHOP /e;: /1#,�' C QARVALE BARBER SHOP ( i TO THE CITY OF EAGAN We the undersigned , support John J . Young ' s request for an Outdoor Advertising Devise to support the Cedervale Business Area . We agree with Mr . Young 's analysis that outdoor advertising can effectively promote, and direct customers to , the Cedervale business area . DATE NAME (Print) SIGNATURE TITLE BUSINESS NAME //-/° -- '2 az ; ,-i//s/4047 ,/e-re&z(Z2 ..,"7 ‘-<;:czz ?C7 _C 4-2-- >(677 ,/,. „,,_ ,,,, , , " ,I tf 7 f'(___-_, — / .5 2 W/tip A/F/ (''l2/(-- 7, 1.4 e,c, 6.1,4-72 41 J i4 c 144 t--(- 1 3 -4-1, . .c f A_;--I-- t ci6 /6-&-- 1 LL It-I,AvoAc,-, nigCN4 A-) Ace 471,0, , • /3 SL A� ,S;O/Srl I, lXk'�. v 5 :—± 14 - 13 53— U Jc■50,. L^%ch /1Aetj c4.._ LA-HA LA 4t—( 3 i J ! I/ --(3.— )--- d A.,1124...„ , 414 eft/ r,,j,,,,./ 7 irt 4-/ky 4 4/' 13 c r ,ft C 1 C - r, rin e ..■_./)9, 7 . --) " g ,Ir&g: /11.,.11/) 11rri LI-- ___. 1/ ._; A , 6 i , k6 h 1/: *i A/6-S ,pr 7:-s / r4-3) 11- I 3-q.2-....-, ....._ 74c-ry,4,-,-,....) _ 10_,q Tkrimacize1/4, I)■-rqtry----- - c. i) l' Ar`42_,., ' • TO THE CITY OF EAGAN We the undersigned, support John J . Young' s request for an Outdoor Advertising Devise to support the Cedervale Business Area . We agree with Mr . Young 's analysis that outdoor advertising can effectively promote, and direct customers to , the Cedervale business area . DATE NAME (Print) SICNAT1TRE TITLE BUSINESS NAME 4l 6' 0 (1 /1,c‘;.5 .....__._ 1 .4v4 er 1 11 1 vt eiti a.— /92 l5 Di rz 7 fr2.5 cw � 7 -1— 1-. -' Z Ti- t 1 = 11'A-r (t-S -Y . ,f ,'p - 1�3 -C . ,l? L CC--,,.. K \ • i.\ -ti,(11bv C- tr6,,L,.v-' • .. _ ; .__, • _ i 4// 471/4)_ ----7-De„,„1; 5 47re /4---/-- C.— •71-1_,-(-- ‘44----)-- v *- ‘ . 6 „I/ 7 57 - . _,;�.; I(-)' IL 7 \ - -\ ' N. - C--\-f-TtV\(- CI .--I - I'Ll- 4;1 1- V_ ;i1-C..-a It( C C;'Idt/A'(2/L.---) '-i41 (1-) /CO 3 V--/4/ -CI 2_ _7" ._..-;.4 rj;/-,-.-c - --77 .4r? _ , I-7,-!. --- .7 _ .- --,,--,,_-,--,-j--k, r9i , n y" /y- 9�- �,� �/r �'lp�l�/1iL) U��/ `�J�1«�l ©�1 X112 , � C ,�� .1.4 /4. , 92_111(411-?- rico•u_. so c l_ ci_Jci_y_2_ Y(/`• ,c-ct .orQ 02-52/1. ?-7-cAi- PKL' c -f'3 c.,,_ c ( (r c ' DATE -3171 CITY OF EAGAN NEW ON SALE FEE 3830 PILOT KNOB ROAD RENEWAL OFF SALE FEE EAGAN,MINNESOTA 55122 TEMPORARY TEMPORARY FEE$25.00 APPLICATION FOR NON-INTOXICATING MALT UQUOR LICENSE PLEASE PRINT APPUCANT Metro Oil OWNER'S NAME Total Petroleum, Inc. t) (F (Middle) st ( (Middle) Address 999 All St. , Ste Y1u)0 999 1.8�Ai �t. , Ste. 9)0 (Street) (Street) Denver CO 80201 Denver, CO 80201 Pity) (State) PP) (may) (State) PP) Phone 303-291-2000 Birthdate Phone Birthdate TRADE NAME Total MANAGER'S NAME Swanson Leonard 144,.de. (Last) (First) (Middle) Address 2000 Rahncliff Address 2435 E. Old Shakepee (Street) (Street) Eagan MN 55122 Bloomington MN 55425 (City) (State) (Zip) (City) (State) PP) Phone 612-452–163 2 Phone Birthdate HEREBY APPLIES FOR NON-INTOXICATING UQUOR LICENSE for the year 1993 ,from 3 / 1 _ to / (month) (date) (month) (date) Event Location: (for temporary license) (Address) Are you the actual proprietor? Yes ( ) No (3 Are you the owner of the property of the business location? Yes ( ) No*) Has any other license of this kind been granted to you? Yes (i No ( ) Where See Attachment A (City) (Year) Are any taxes,assessments or utility bills for the permises unpaid or deliquent? Yes ( ) No (). tf yes,give reason. During the past year,has a summons been issued under the Liquor Civil Liability Law MS 304.A802? Yes ( ) No (3. If yes,attach summary copy. Have you ever been convicted? Yes ( ) No () City (Other than a traffic offense) is this a joint ownership or silent partnership? Yes ( ) No (X).If yes,please attach a lisling of complete names,dates of birth,addresses and telephone numbers fo everyone involved. I HEREBY VERIFY THAT THERE HAS BEEN NO CHANGE IN OWNERSHIP OR MANAGERS IN THE PAST YEAR. THE LICENSEE HEREBY AGREES TO INDEMNIFY AND HOLD EAGAN HARMLESS FROM ANY AND ALL CLAIMS OR SUITS INCLUDING ATTORNEYS FEES AND OTHER DEFENSE COSTS,WHICH THE CITY OF EAGAN MAY INCUR BY REASON OF ANY ACTIVITIES ARISING FROM THE GRANTING OF THIS 3.2 BEER UCENSE. I(we) HEREBY AGREE TO OPERATE SUCH BUSINESS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LAWS OF MINNESOTA AND THE ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF EAGAN. THE FOREGOING STATEMENTS ARE TRUE AND CORRECT TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE AND BEUEF. E • r ■ AUTHORQED SIGNATURE lI < L J rl f 1' /� t � • • first) ,, Full Middle) (Last) FOR CITY USE ONLY POLICE APPROVAL: YES c14, NO () SIGNED /.�/'0>L Q-''-4y--- DATED 17/–/s- ( 3 — CRY COUNCIL APPROVAL YES () NO ()SIGNED DATED -y CITY OF EAGAN 3830 PILOT KNOB ROAD EAGAN, MINNESOTA 55122 PART II - PERSONAL INFORMATION DIRECTIONS: This form must be filled out in duplicate with typewriter or by printing in ink by the sole owner, by EACH partner, by EACH manager, proprietor or other agent in charge of the premises, by EACH person who by combined ownership or poptrol has an interest in a corporation or association in excess of 5%. DATE: 71 1 1. TRUE NAME: t n t CDw x-17 Last First Middle 2. RESIDENT ADDRESS: 177"1 9. 1\1 txt.9 (_0 TT 7,A:3---CH2e Street Home Phone ( -ice )..AN 55tz City State Zip 3. BUSINESS ADDRESS: —Pt-c v<NC 13 717'i> Street Business Phone IV/ j E�NN (A 557i 22 City State Zip 4. PLACE OF BIRTH: t,wAtivc�� 1Y►��W�}v'�J� tiNZ City County State 5. DATE OF BIRTH: '+�t 63 Month Date Year • 6. U. S. CITIZEN? Yes t' No NATURALI7.FD? Yes No If yes, give date and place: 7. ALIAS: If you have ever used or been known by a name or names other than the true name given in #1 above, list such name(s) and information concerning dates and places names have been used: Name(s) Dates, Places & Circumstances 8. MARITAL STATUS: Single Married 'Widowed Divorced Separated 9. If married, true name, place and date 9.1 birth and residence address of spouse: True Name: Place & Date Of Birth: Iy ' 196/ p■%.21-AN3 >7&rzv; ►k5 Residence Address: • Street City,State,Zip 10. Address(es) at which you have lived during preceding ten years. (Begin with present or last address and work back) Number and Street City and State Dates 17" MtV y1 13 7 - 3J1 .j`t3 — rrrv,��i:��-�.-r_ ,.•:I ti.4. .1:Vf� ?4.- C�?s�~ Iltsi 11 i'z - A(2.-6: n �4I rtT 7 - iv i.i.:ka.an�� v�(IK ►<5 IL; ;"_, u� r`l Sf �ti a [,rtr, r4}-r-A 1 11 11. Address(es) at which your spouse has lived during preceding ten years. (Begin with present or last address and work back). Number and Streeter City and State Dates IrIY t IILIZ VJ IL;..A rte. 4�.D � f - ) .. L pi44244 K 5 k("f/t'`, — 12. Kind, name and location of every business or occupation you have been engaged in during the preceding ten years. (Begin with present or last address and work back) Business or Occupation Street Address,Citv,State Nature of Business or Occupation CH 5 R-E-- ., 'r,Jky2411- MN 59i it. C M >t( -1,N4r y'e_ev;,N x114.5 1L k,oCL/ any. N z> c. rr}. 13. Kind, name and location of every bus:.ness or occupation your spouse has been engaged in during the preceding ten years. (Begin with present or last one and work back) Business or Occupation Street Address,Cirv,State Nature of Business or Occupation C4-- (`('r Si Y1 ' N�N;.;{..3T7 LP, F1_,y w 5.5,1 72: 3A Ht.," �rHr A i �1�� yv `Irir' �j� C�IkUtA/�) �[�i.'.. ✓..5 L' -,Z �r'i`�`�c- .44Z 14. Names and addresses of your employers and partners, if any, for the preceding ten years. (Begin with present or last one and work back). NA_MES:Partners or Employers Street Address,Citv,State Dates 15. Names and addresses of your spouse's employers and partners, if any, for the preceding ten years. (Begin with present or last one and work back). NA.MES:Partners or Employers Street Address,Citv,State Dates 16. Have you, your spouse, or child of either of you, ever been convicted of any felony, crime or violation of any ordinance, other than traffic? Yes__ No 7 If yes, give information as to the time, place and offense for which convicted: 17. Have you, your spouse, or a parent, brother, sister or child of either of you, ever been engaged as an mployee or in operating a saloon, hotel, resta irant, cafe, tavern or other business of a similar nature? Yes V No If yes, give information as to the time, place and length of time. Sri . IZ 13 r`c■L N1t �► 1 +-Tt n 'N ih) .1(J tv+r51: 18. Have you ever been in military service? Yes No / If Yes, was discharge(s) ever other than honorable? Yes No (upon request, you may he required to exhibit all discharges.) 2 19. Names, residence address, business address and telephone numbers of each person who is engaged in Minnesota in the business of selling, manufacturing or distributing intoxicating liquor and who is nearer of kin to you or your spouse than a second cousin, whether of whole or half blood, computed by the rules of civil law, or who is a brother-in-law or who is a sister-in-law of you or your spouse. 1. Full Name rvc Relationship Residence Address phone Business Address phone 2. Full Name Relationship Residence Address phone Business Address Phone 20. Are you a manufacturer or wholesaler of intoxicating liquor or interested directly or indirectly in the ownership or operation of any such business? Yes_ No 21. Are you directly or indirectly interested il-other establishments in the City of Eagan to which a license of the same kind has been issued? Yes No / 22. Are you the spouse of a person who would be ineligible for a license? Yes No_:! 23. What is the amount of investment that you will have in the business, including building, premises, fixtures, furniture, stock in trade, etc., and what was the source of such money? Nay 24. Have you had ant" terest in any previous intoxicating liquor license that was revoked, suspended or not renewed? Yes No ✓ If yes, explain in detail. 25. Have you ever individually, or with others, made ap, 1ication in any municipality for an intoxicating liquor license and had such application denied? Yes No ;/ if so, where and what were conditions of denial? 26. REFERENCES: Name, residence address, business address and telephone numbers of three persons, residents of Twin Cite Metropolitan area, of good moral character, not related to the applicant or financially interested in the premises or business, who may be referred to as to the applicant's character. Name - rN Residence Address Phone Stree'. City-State-Zip Business Address i5"."--5L: t.T 1\4 .S. 5. yti IZ... phone CH L.- -- Z Stre « Mme+ City-State-Zip Name L,C (^ Residence Address `t`I P1`.1 5 \•,j 4■3 phi ,_-71,i1 373 - c`c.c;ti Street City-State-Zip Business Address phi �jt�btil�_ Street City-State-Zip Name v,�� 2x�5 Residence Address Phone 7 37 - Street City-State-Zip Business Address --:;,ti -tw't I Jt) A NN . (JAN phone ;( -e ft Street City-State-Zip 3 City of Eagan Fee: $25.00 ' 830 Pilot Knob Road APPLICATION FOR LICENSE License year •k. Eagan, MN 55122-1897 TREE MAINTENANCE CONTRACTOR For ladividual,partnership or corporation who cart, trim, prune, remote spray or treat trees. I, Jeff' 1-kts ion hereby make application for a TREE MAINTENANCE CONTRACTOR license for the year /71; from the City of Eagan. OWNER:.'Tea' //,,,,10,1 ADDRESS/j7 /1 rwol9,1017 /4't.So. PHONE # /„„,) (street) /.51.4 rrtSf-1%/e /1/rti „SS"33 7 (city) (state) (zip) BUSINESS // NAME: uSfa/1s J JGrt,r ADDRESS:)39ey j;7un j4e.,<6, PHONE #4,42-0,4-S.:t ' (street) (714 tide /77,11 X53337 (city) (state) (zip) EMPLOYEES PERFORMING TREE MAINTENANCE: Name: LT(efr c v AJ//L s /7 (first (middle) (last) Name: /vyA, /9Cl/"0'DS1 1-4_.010/1 (first) (middle) (last) Name: (first) (middle) (last) Name: (first) (middle) (last) (ATTACH ADDITIONAL NAMES) VEHICLES USED FOR TREE MAINTENANCE: I/?G Ird R.VO atrrlp r K .2l .) 74' (name) (year) (make) (model) (license number) 19ge? Aeti C-30, 151) 1glrt Boom, u ‘,74630 (name) (year) (make) (model) (license number) sr>rarle. railer .YJ7.2 S� (name) (year) (make) (model) (license number) (ATTACH ADDITIONAL VEHICLE INFORMATION) EQUIPMENT USED FOR TREE MAINTENANCE: (e.g., stump grinder, brush dipper,chainsaws,sprayer,etc.) 6-116;J1 $611A-S. / AuL)1e >� 4ruck1 Octr►o/9 Ircit , ad Avis ✓er, (name) (function) (name) (function) (ATTACH ADDITIONAL EQUIPMENT INFORMATION) City of Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Road APPLICATION FOR LICENSE Eagan, MN 55122-1897 TREE MAINTENANCE CONTRACTOR For individual,partnership or corporation who cut, trim, prune, remove spray or treat trees. I n " }c�� { } hereby make application for a TREE MAINTENANCE r E_ CONTRACTOR license for the year </ from the City of Eagan. OWNER:j 1 ��c' r'/1 Y1 i1t' ADDRESS: �1/ i ''S f)1 L t r/ / vPHONE #4A-5/--9s19-6-2 -'� (street) Fie:/t) /I)ibf (city) (state) (rip) BUSINESS ( _ NAME: �,c"C 11 t.ri (C�' �1 ee(rt DRESS: 'zY ry► e- t -> 1 it 2L/ PHONE # (street) (city) (state) (zip) EMPLOYEES PERFORMING TREE MAINTENANCE: Name: ' (first) (middle) (last) Name: (first) (middle) (last) Name: (first) (middle) (last) Name: (first) (middle) (last) (ATTACH ADDITIONAL NAMES) VEHICLES U ED FO TREE MAMTENANCE: mtk-tiy Mr) .) 6) (nam ) (year) (make) (model) (license number (name) (y ear) (make) (model) (license number) (name) (year) (make) (model) (license number) (ATTACH ADDITIONAL VEHICLE INFORMATION) EQUIPMENT USED FOR TREE MAINTENANCE: (e.g., stump grinder, brush dipper,chainsaws, sprayer,etc.) C)1 ■ � r� e_. 11 . 1) r`t/ cA (name) (fun Lion) att.L.[ C.!2... {ti � tt� £' �Iv,' (name) (function) (ATTACH ADDITIONAL EQUIPMENT INFORMATION) , City of Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Road APPLICATION FOR LICENSE Eagan, MN 55122-1897 TREE MAINTENANCE CONTRACTOR For individnal,� urG h On who taut, trim, prnut --temove spray or treat trees. I,C(40e1,576070 PccM4A)&) hereby make application for a TREE MAINTENANCE CONTRACTOR license for the year 9 from the City of Eagan. OWNER:9 ' /Y/ �'� ADDRESS: / 7f9 PHONE '-'(--S'.0CJ L?S50'14JAJ (street) 4 h CAC) J 6/1/ S.,S"Jc-.): (city) (state) (zip) BUS ,.n / 7��J / NAME: Mile ��&&. -% S ADDRESS: " 5 (-37c �� 4 PHONE # C�S� '�f,5 cY) (strett) (546410 5 sus--13,(). (city) (state) (zip) EMPLOYEES PERFORMING TREE MAINTENANCE: Name: p >m (first) (middle) (last) Name: (first) (middle) (last) Name: (first) (middle) (last) Name: (first) (middle) (last) (ATTACH ADDITIONAL NAMES) VEHICLES USED FOR TREE MAINTENANCE: Q6 I 9 (- __Cpa)/0 ocK s z (a u;) (yer)a (.m,.kt fi-) i"model) (license number) a/h2 m(J< vo kto F- = ao C (name) (year) (make) (model) (license nu ber) (name) (year) (make) (model) (license number) (ATTACH ADDITIONAL VEHICLE INFORMATION) EQUIPMENT USED FOR TREE MAINTENANCE: (e.g., stump grinder, brush clipper,diainsawss,, sprayer,etc-) 7 ,1LT-411-1 t,(name) (function) T]/ _ 5 , � 544o 5 (name) (function) (ATTACH ADDITIONAL EQUIPMENT INFORMATION) FOR _ EGA 14' c" E FEE Minnes Lat fuI Gambling CHECK_ IN ^ta Premises Permit Application - Part 1 of 2 D TE s DATE Type oAtapiication - — - - --- Class of premises permit Renewal (check one) Organization base license number I I A($400) Pull-tabs,tipboards,paddlewheels,raffles,bingo Premises permit number X jj B($250) Pull-tabs,tipboards,paddewheels,raffles FXl New ❑ C($200) Bingo only 1 L D($150) Raffles only Organization Ir}formation Name of Organization Eagan Hockey Association, Inc business Address of Organization-Street or P.0 Box(Do not use the address of your gambling manager) PO Box 21481 City State Zip Code County Daytime phone number Eagan MN 55121-0481 Dakota 612) 688-7235 Name of chief executive officer(cannot be your gambling manager) Title Daytime phone number John R. Freeman President ( ) same Bingo Occasions If applying for a class A or C permit, fill in days and beginning & ending hours of bingo occasions: No more than seven bingo occasions may be conducted by your organization per week. Day Beginning/Ending Hour Day Beginning/Endtng Hours Day Beginning/Ending Hours to to_. — to to to^--- to to U bingo will not be conducted,check here Gambling Premises Information Acme of establishment where gambling will be conducted Street Address(do not use a post off ice Eox number) Cherokee Sirloin Room 4625 Nicols Road Eagan, MN 55122 Is the premises located within city limits? IX]Yes f-1 No If no,is township j organized unorganized r l unincorporated City and County where gambling premises is located OR Township and County where gambling premises is located it outside of cy limits Eagan, MN--Dakota County Name and address of legal owner of premiss City State Zip Code Rick, Tom and Jim Casper same aka ye (Cheretke Si rl ni n Raoml Does your organization own the building where the gambling wll be conducted? Ezi YES rya NO If no,attach the following: • a copy of the lease(form LG202)with terms for at least one year_ • a copy of a sketch of the Moor plan with dimensions,showing what portion is being leased A lease and sketch are not required for Class D applications. Address of sto - :e t i ace of :ambl n_ e I ui•went -Do not use a PO box rutrnber 1128 Tiffany int Ewan !i e � • (Home of Gambling Manager, L. Schmidt; Brinks Security System installed, Feb. 1993) . PremiEs c . :,_it A- ''ci - tier - Pcrt 2 of 2 Garnbling Bank Account Inforrnatio Punk Ac:cJ-t ".. _- First Bank Ea an To he cl nec afte• - - --.-se e: - c ess CIty State _- - k 3629 Krestwood Lary = an t ; Name a.'�ass, a::: _ of Fcrs,r.s a.:;:.-,...: : . __ _—k_a a;:d mike ck-pcs,s a., • ;. .:s. C'anrzar--s rroa= -- ^at fro"die cams~':-g s:.;.-,d Frame Az:: ., T�ta Lynn Schmidt 112J, -iffani iThint Gamblinc I':: = :er F a rl 0 n . V Acknowledgement Gambling Site Authorization •I am the chief executive officer of the organization; I hereby ccnsent that local law enforcement officers,the •I assume full responsibility for the fair and lawful opera- bca,d or agents of the board, or the commissioner of tion of all activities to be conducted; revenue or public safety,or agents of the commissioners, •I will familiarize myself with the laws of Minnesota may enter the premises to enforce the law. governing lawful gambling and rules ct the board and Bank Records Information agree, if licensed,to abide by those laws and rules, The board is authorized to inspect the bank records of the including amendments to them; gambling account whenever necessary to futfill .any changes in application information will be submitted requirements of current gambling rules and law. to the board and local unit of government within 10 days Oath of the change; and I declare that: .1 understand that failure to provide required information •I have read this application and all information submitted or providing false or misleading information may result in to the board is true, accurate and complete; the denial or revocation of the license. -all other required information has been fully disclosed; Signatur chi ex • e officer Date -- 4 -0,1� March 5, 1993 Local Government Acknowledgement 4. A copy of the local unit of government's resolution ao- 1. The city 'must sign this application if the gambling prem- proving this aoolication must be attached to this application. ises is located within city limits. 5. If this application is denied by the local unit of gcv�rnment, 2. The county"AND township" must sign this application if it should not be submitted to the Gambling Control Bca-d. the gambling premises is boated within a township. 3. The local unit government (city or county) must pass a Township: By signature below,the township acknow edges resolution specifically approving or denying this application. that thEi organization is applying for a premises permit within township limits. City' or County** Township" City or County Name Township Name Eagan (Signature of,p�erson receiving application Signature of person receiving application Tide ( ate Received Tide 1 Date Received (. ii Le ic ._ j ) J / ) Refer to the instructions for required attachments. Mail to: Gambling Control Board Rosewood Plaza South,3rd Floor 1711 W.County Road 13 Roseville,MN 55113 LG214(Part 2) (Pe.-•2'51) mmmmimmmmm .LG202 (10/28/92) Minnesota Lawful Gambling Lease Agreement Premises Information Name and Address of Lessor Address City/Zip Code Phone Cherokee Sirloin Room Rick , Tom , and Jim Casper 'i625 Nicols Road , Eagan ,MN5 177 61 —454-6744 Name of Legal Owner of Gambling Premises Address City/Zip Code Phone same same ( ) same Name and Address of Leased Premises Address City/Zip Code .S2me same same Name of Organization Leasing the Premises (lessee) License Number, 'rf known FT-IL Hnrkey ARsociation , Inc . New Application Gambling Activity The lawful gambling activity which the organization will conduct is (check all that apply): I bingo I I raffles I I paddlewheels pull-tabs ( I tipboards Rent Information (See Rules 7861.0060, Subp 2D) Class A and C premises permits: Class B and D premises permits: Rent for bingo and all other gambling activities conducted Rent for gambling activities not including bingo during that bingo occasion may not exceed: is a maximum of $1000 per month. $200 for up to 6,000 square feet; $300 for up to 12,000 square feet; and $400 for more than 12,000 square feet. Rent to be paid per bingo occasion $ Rent to be paid per month $ 1 0 0 0 . 0 0 Rent may not be based on a percentage of receipts,profits from lawful gambling,or on the number of participants attending a bingo occasion. An organization may not pay rent to itself or to any of its affiliates for space used for the conduct of lawful gambling. Premises Description The area(s) leased within the premises are 8 feet by 8 feet,for a total of 64 square feet. feet by feet,for a total of . square feet. feet by feet,for a total of . square feet. [Combined total_ b ri square feet Sketch Attach a sketch which shows the location and dimensions of the leased areas. Effective Dates The lease will go into effect at 12:01 a.m. on A u g u a t 2� 93 , and will end at 12:00 a.m. on August 2 8 19 94 . for a period of at least one year. Times and Days of Bingo Activity (If none, indicate N/A) 5;7 N/A The bingo occasions will be held (a maximum of 7 bingo occasions per organization): from(hours) (a.m./p.m.) to (a.mJp.m.) on (days of week) _ from (hours) (a.m./p.m.) to (a.mJp.m.) on (days of week) _ from (hours) (a.m./p.m.) to (a.mJp.m.) on (days of week) _ from (hours) (a.m./p.m.) to (a.mJp.m.) on (days of week) from (hours) (a.m./p.m.) to (a.mJp.m.) on (days of week) _ from (hours) (a.m./p.m.) to (a.mJp.m.) on (days of week) _ from (hours) (a.m./p.m.) to (a.mJp.m.) on (days of week) _ By,agreeing to the terms of this lease, it is mutually agreed that: • When leasing from a licensed bingo hall,the lessor must be legal owner of the property. •The owner of the property or the lessor may not manage gambling at the premises. •The lessor of the premises, his or her immediate family, and any agents or employees of the lessee may not participate as players in the conduct of lawful gambling on the leased premises. •The lessor and the lessee do not have a direct or indirect financial interest in the distribution or manufacture of gambling equipment. •The lessor of the premises will allow the Board or agents of the Board,the Commissioner of Public Safety or agents of the commissioner, or the Commissioner of Revenue or agents of the commissioner, and law enforcement personnel to inspect the premises at any reasonable time,and permit the organization to conduct lawful gambling at the premises according to the terms of this lease.The lessor may not impose any conditions on the organization regarding distributors of gambling equipment, services, or the use of profits. • The organization must obtain an organization license, gambling manager license and a premises permit from the Gambling Control Board. The organization will be responsible for complying with the laws and rules of lawful gambling. •The organization must have, at the gambling premises, a current inventory of gambling equipment, a sketch with dimensions of the premises available for review, and a clear physical separation or divider between the lessee's gambling equipment and the lessor's business equipment. •The organization will be responsible for ensuring that the lessor's business activities are not conducted on the leased premises. • The lease shall be terminated immediately for any gambling, liquor, prostitution or tax evasion Violations occurring on the premises. •The lessor of the premises shall provide the lessee access to the licensed premises during any time reasonable and necessary to conduct lawful gambling on the premises and as agreed upon in this lease. •(Write in any other conditions or restrictions that will be included as part of the lease.Attach additional sheets if necessary) If , for some reason , the Eagan Hockey Association is unable to obtain a stat gambling license , this lease will be null and void . This lease is the total and only agreement between the lessor and the organization conducting lawful gambling activities. There is no other agreement and no other consideration required between the parties as to the lawful gambling and other matters related to this lease. Any changes in this lease must be submitted to the Gambling Control Board within 10 days of the change. •na re of Le- or I Date Signature of organization official (lessee) Date 4-15-93 Title Title CF. O President , Eagan Hockey Assn . Inc . A copy of this lease and sketch with dimensions must be submitted with the premises permit application renewal or when changes in the lease occur to: Gambling Control Board 1711 W. County Road B, Suite 300 S Roseville, Minnesota 55113 (10/28/92) VeZ0 'JSti\ S lk�kk AffietHtZW C%cteit = city of cccjan IPtIP Report for Lexington Avenue (C.R. 43) and Lone Oak Road (C.S.A.H. 26) Intersection Reconstruction/Signalization . e City Project No. 601A e ot Eagan, Minnesota '� December 1992 4/ 1 P y Air ,zsts File No. 49525 Date EA ENGINEERING DEFT Bonestroo Rosene MSS Anderlik & Associates Engineers &Architects St. Pant, Minnesota r Otto G.Bonestroo.PE. Howard A.Sanford,P.E. Michael P.Rau.P.E. Miles B.Jensen,P.E. etalBonestroo _ Robert W.Rosene,P.E.* Keith A.Gordon,P.E. Agnes M.Ring,A.I.C.P. L.Phillip Gravel It,P.E. Bonestroo V Joseph C.Anderlik,P.E. Robert R.Pfefferle,RE. Thomas W.Peterson,P.E. Karen L.Wiemeri,RE. Rosene Marvin L.Sorvala,P.E. Richard W.Foster,P.E. Michael C.Lynch,RE. Gary D.Kristofist,P.E. „ t S`;_; Richard E.Turner,RE. David O.Loskota,P.E. James R.Maland,RE. F Todd Foster,P.E. ,.„�, �@�{ �/ & Glenn R.Cook,P.E. Robert C.Russek,A.I.A. Jerry D.Pertzsch,P.E. Keith R.Yapp,P.E. Anderilkk bit Thomas E.Noyes.PE. Jerry A.Bourdon,P.E. Kenneth R.Anderson.P.E. Shawn D.Gustafson,P.E. Robert G.Schunicht,P.E. Mark A.Hanson,P.E. Mark R.Roth,P.E. Cecilio Olivier,P.E. Associates Susan M.Ebedin,C.P.A. Michael T Rautmann,P.E. Mark A.Seip,P.E. Charles A.Erickson "Senior Consultant Ted K.Field,P.E. Gary W.Morien,P.E. Leo M.Pawelsky Thomas R.Anderson,A.I.A. Daniel J.Edgerton,PE. Harlan M.Olson Engineers & Architects Donald C.Burgardt,PE. Daryl K.Kirschenman,P.E. James F.Engelhardt Thomas E.Angus,P.E. Philip J.Caswell,P.E. Ismael Martinez,P.E. Mark D.Wallis,P.E. December 24, 1992 Honorable Mayor and City Council City of Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55122 Re: Lexington Avenue (C.R. 43) & Lone Oak Road (C.S.A.H. 26) Intersection Reconstruction/Signalization Project No. 601A - Our File No. 49525 Dear Mayor and Council: Transmitted herewith is our report for Lexington Avenue (C.R.43) and Lone Oak Road (C.S.A.H.26), Intersection Reconstruction/Signalization, Project No. 601A (Alternate). The proposed improvements associated utility construction and cost estimates are discussed and presented in this report. A preliminary assessment roll is also included. It should be noted this project is similar to Project 601 presented in the summer of 1991 with slight modifications which are discussed herein. We will be pleased to meet with the Council and other interested parties at a mutually convenient time to discuss this report. Yours very truly, BONES'1'RO , ROSENE, ANDERLIK& ASSOCIATES, INC. M A. Hanson MAH:lk I hereby certify that this report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Registered Professional Engineer under the laws of the State o sota Reviewed by: GIr4 � 14 1s Dept. of Public Works Mark A. Hanson Date: Date: December 24, 1992 Reg. No. 14260 Reviewed by: Finance Director Date: 2335 West Highway 36 • St. Paul, Minnesota 55113 • 612-636-4600 LEXINGTON AVENUE (C.R. 43) & LONE OAK ROAD (C.S.A.H. 26) INTERSECTION RECONSTRUCTION/SIGNALIZATION EAGAN, MINNESOTA PROJECT NO. 601A TABLE OF CONTENTS Page No. LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS 2 SCOPE 3 Figure 1 5 FEASIBILITY AND RECOMMENDATION 6 DISCUSSION 6 Street 6 Figure 2 8 Figure 2A 9 Figure 2B 10 Storm Sewer 11 Sanitary Sewer and Water 12 COST ESTIMATE 13 RIGHT-OF-WAY AND EASEMENT 13 AREA TO BE INCLUDED 14 ASSESSMENTS 15 REVENUE 16 PROJECT SCHEDULE 18 APPENDIX A 19 APPENDIX B 20 Figure 3-5 - Utility Layout Figure 6 - Street Assessment 2 SCOPE: This project provides for the reconstruction of the intersection at Lexington Avenue (C.R. 43) and Lone Oak Road (C.S.A.H. 26) which includes the installation of a traffic signal (Figure No. 1). The existing utilities will be reconstructed and upgraded as required. The intersection improvements are proposed at this time due to the existing traffic volumes and turning movements resulting at this intersection. The existing traffic volume meets warrants for a traffic signal. Listed below are the 1988 average daily traffic volumes (ADT) as determined by Dakota County and the projected traffic volumes for the year 2010. 1988 ADT 2010 ADT Lone Oak Road (C.S.A.H. 26) West of Lexington Avenue 12,700 27,100 East of Lexington Avenue 6,900 17,600 Lexington Avenue (C.R. 43) South of Lone Oak Road 7,500 21,600 North of Lone Oak Road 2,800 13,100 A similar project(Project No. 601) as proposed herein was presented to the City in the summer of 1991. However, after much discussion Project No. 601 was rejected due to concerns with the concrete raised center medians on Lexington Avenue and the bituminous trail construction on the west side of Lexington Avenue north of Lone Oak Road. In the fall of 1992, Project No. 601R was presented to the City which was similar to Project No. 601; however, it was expanded considerably. Project No. 601R not only included the intersection/signalization improvements at Lone Oak Road and Lexington Avenue, but also included upgrading Lone Oak Road up to and through T.H. 55. After much discussion Project No. 601R was also rejected based on many concerns. A few of those concerns are listed below: - Concrete center medians on Lexington Avenue 49525A.rpt 3 - Concrete center median the entire length of Lone Oak Road from Lexington Avenue to T.H. 55. - Removal of the railroad bridge and construction of an at-grade crossing. - Dart Transfer Corp. driveway access onto Lone Oak Road. - The alignment of Lone Oak Road in the vicinity of Dart Transfer Corp. - The cost of the project, the cost for right-of-way acquisition, and the proposed assessments to the benefitted property. The project proposed herein (Project No. 601A) is similar to Project No. 601 presented in July, 1991 with the following exceptions: - The bituminous trail construction on the west side of Lexington Avenue north of Lone Oak Road has been deleted. Therefore, the right-of-way acquisition is not as great as proposed in Project No. 601. - The center median in Lexington Avenue north of Lone Oak Road will only be constructed a short distance to the north. Therefore not preventing any left turn movements to the adjacent property. - A right turn lane on Lone Oak Road west bound to north bound Lexington Avenue is proposed similar to Project No. 601R discussed this fall. The right turn Iane was not previously proposed in Project No. 601 discussed in July 1991. 49525A.rpt 4 ,�` WIERSrA7E MW NO 494 111116,, C B BLUE CENR4N R7 u11"; 070-05 116.1E•00%. 1 r II , ,, .rte 27 2B 129 30 31 132 33 3< 35 38 � mi 2 II.D;32-02 11 10 9 B 7 8 5 q S 3 A EACAN lNLil577F" R) 2$ ) 4 IIIWV‘ir4F OW�; tae ® dpar �tr��F1� Ifl�o ME m uati tten ■ to , A man= 0o��0�0 111110EINIMIll %* ° Eel SI--g, ©d 050-00 WI�ri EE4715CE 0 CEx1Ers lRnusrrwc PARK ru0.a EAOAMOALE/ il � a 171-04 .... . .a.,._.. ., IIIIIPPY 152_00 M r, . MOMIEMMOMI 191-04 Mir 1 liaC MMEMBIOMMI Efir PROJECT ,s Ew Fr =an, 12 1 4',x LOCATION- 4 / A, >f 51 3;:y. yy c i:.,. > coo 010-03 ©El P ' Z F „x''” fi 7 8 9 10 11 1213 Q1 3 2 M 010-25 �j g c.c.PR A © "1 �S - ® to - 280-D4 �i 1-03 Sp 31 323435 I i o" 010-26 15 P, APOLLO RD 1 _�y 18 1 _Si�"f>' 17 4 IP Ff' t,, 18 2 s� 20 qty lc 037-05 21 p .3 I 010-08 ' 28 25 24 23 22 010-05 b44 �WOVI R04D 4 1 t45 072-04 \. 1 2 3 4 97 S. 0 -OB 10 j 5 T ..‘„J 4 1 3 2 1 - ` u a 1:1) 010-57 2 010-50 0 1000 2000 1 010-76 @ 3 ® 4 Seale in feat LOCATION PLAN fi Bonestroo Rosene ■ InEAGAN, MINNESOTA FIGURE 1 Associa e► Asocia4es LEXINGTON AVE. (C.R. 43) & Engineers Architects LONE OAK RD. (C.S.A.H. 26) PROJECT NO. 601A 2335 West Highway 36 eo\A.ac,7c\Aac9riFf11 DECEMBER 1992 COMM. 49516 St Paul, Minnesota 55113 FEASIBILITY AND RECOMMENDATION The project is feasible from an engineering standpoint and is in accordance with the Master Utility and Street Plans for the City of Eagan and Dakota County. The project as outlined herein will be administered by Dakota County. The City of Eagan will be required to enter into a cost sharing agreement with Dakota County similar to past agreements. DISCUSSION Street: The proposed street improvements include widening and reconstructing Lexington Avenue and Lone Oa k Road approximately 700 ' in each direction from their intersection. Lexington Avenue north and south of Lone Oak Road presently exists as a 4 lane roadway with concrete curb to the south and bituminous curb to the north. Lone Oak Road west of Lexington Avenue exists as a 5 lane roadway with concrete curb and was upgraded as part of the construction of I-35E with Lone Oak Road. Lone Oak Road east of Lexington Avenue exists as a two lane rural section roadway. A four way stop sign presently exists at the intersection. The specific improvements for Lexington Avenue and Lone Oak Road west of Lexington Avenue include removal of existing concrete and bituminous curbs and constructing new concrete curbs to accommodate the design street width. The existing street section will be maintained and the area between the new concrete curb and existing street section will be patch. The center medians will be constructed on the existing street surface. Once the new concrete curbs, center medians, and bituminous patching is complete, the entire street surface will be overlayed with a 1-1/2" thick 2341 Bituminous Wear Course. The street improvements proposed for Lone Oak Road east of Lexington Avenue include complete reconstruction that includes grading and storm sewer. The design street width each direction from the intersection 49525A.rpt 6 provide for four driving lanes and left turn lanes separated by a center median. As previously discussed, the median in Lexington Avenue north of Lone Oak Road will only be constructed a short distance to the north. An additional right turn is provided on Lone Oak Road west and east of Lexington Avenue and on Lexington Avenue south of Lone Oak Road. The design street widths at the Lone Oak Road and Lexington Avenue intersection are shown on Figure No. 2. As previously mentioned, a new traffic signal is also included. Figures No. 2A and 2B show the street improvements beyond the intersection. The proposed improvements on Lone Oak Road discussed as part of Project No. 601R at Neil Armstrong Boulevard are presented on Figure No. 5. 49525A.rpt 7 0 I 1 L1 It Z go «'. BUIy0ING 1°— I �- y INS s BUILD a" W14' 12 14' 14' 14' iiii { l /per ,. :„..y N OAK R� .» i ..:! dn'r � B� Bm - ...:-: :. 14' 14'. I . . . . ^ ) 14'•14' C e i 6' 12' 14' 12' -_ 14' 14' giN .Fes:: 11.:..:..l_ ".:::::. ?f i" ........ „,.. 4te 7 C.S.A.H. 26 0 Egg zY xzi 1. 14' 14' • 14' 12112' 14' N o zs so Scale In feet INTERSECTION LAYOUT jil Bonestroo �. Rosen Anc0erlik 8i EAGAN, MINNESOTA FIGURE 2 Associates LEXINGTON AVE. (C.R. 43) & Engineers 6 Architects OAK RD. (C.S.A.H. 26) PROD. NO. 601A 2335 west Highway 36 do\d0r.7ci\ALOROcFr17 fFt fl4RFR 1009 (YAM 4Q St Paul. Minnesota 55113 e I ` I I� , I [[ I i I I I I I I 111 ' I I I 1 I i I I I I 1 Hampton Dr i , I I TTh : : I I / I I //z// / , / // I If _�// x / o x I IN __/ C F, I I 5 o x s o I Ia i $ He nernq O • _ I I I 3 - 4 CR 43 Lexington Ave :115. _ I 1 1 1 1 I 1 I 1 J i i Lone OaF Circle n I I I I, N -T1 _ 7-1----- ! i I § 3 I, 2 , 4 R1 ? s D _ o 6 _ I I so o 01 6 - G • r 1 I X 0 r � F A N I V I I • t I i j I 1 1 1 I II; g I 1 j 1 I I, i. I '0 I I 1 0 1 , I I I I - ZS 10 I I I 1 A l I 5 I 20 i I 1 I a` E PN 400 auol 92 HMSO — — — — y a x \_V I I r 1 1 � 1 I 1 1 1 , 1K 1 g IF 1 IJ 16 I I , 1 1 I 1 1 1 ' , //- 1 1 / i I • / I 11 / I I I , 11 ,I 0 I S I I I I jj II I I 41.+N9^:3 I I Storm Sewer: Storm sewer exists in Lexington Avenue and Lone Oak Road west of Lexington Avenue. Storm sewer improvements proposed in those sections include extensions to the existing system as shown on the attached drawing. Storm sewer does not exist in Lone Oak Road east of Lexington Avenue. Therefore, it's proposed to extend a new storm sewer system westerly in Lone Oak Road from the existing 36" storm sewer in Neil Armstrong Boulevard as shown on Figure No. 4 and 5. The existing 36" storm sewer in Neil Armstrong Boulevard is limited in capacity. Therefore, in accordance with the Comprehensive Storm Sewer Plan and previously proposed as part of Project No. 601R, it's recommended a future ponding area (Pond EP-9) be developed on the north side of Lone Oak Road between Neil Armstrong Boulevard and Lone Oak Circle. It's recommended the ponding area be developed when Lot 12 of Eagandale Center Industrial Park No. 2 develops or Lone Oak Road (C.S.A.H. 26) is upgraded west of Neil Armstrong Boulevard. The 27" storm sewer proposed herein will connect to the existing 36" storm sewer at Neil Armstrong Boulevard. In the future, the existing 27" storm sewer will be reconstructed and discharge directly into the new ponding area (Pond EP-9) once its developed. Figure No. 3 shows the proposed storm sewer extensions in Lexington Avenue. 49525A.rpt 11 Sanitary Sewer and Water: Sanitary sewer and water main of sufficient size and capacity exist in both Lone Oak Road and Lexington Avenue. As a result, no improvements or upgrades are recommended to these systems. However, adjustment of manhole structures, gate valves and relocation of existing hydrants is required. In addition, due to the grade changes proposed in Lone Oak Road east of Lexington Avenue approximately 350' of 16" water main is proposed to be reconstructed and lowered approximately 3'. It's also proposed to extend a 6" water main and 8" sanitary sewer service to serve future development in Parcel 010-50 and Lot 13 of Eagandale Center Industrial Park No. 2. 49.525A.rpt 12 COST ESTIMATE The estimated cost for this project is summarized below which includes overhead costs. Other costs are estimated at 35% and include legal, engineering, and administration. However, it does not include the yet unknown costs for the easement acquisition process being performed by the County. Street $600,000 Traffic Signal 150,000 Bituminous Trail/Sidewalk 55,000 Storm Sewer 150,000 Sanitary Sewer & Water Main Adjustment 60,000 Sanitary Sewer/Water Service 8,000 TOTAL $1,023,000 RIGHT-OF-WAY AND EASEMENT The project will require additional street right-of-way (R.O.W.). Listed below is the approximate area and additional right-of-way required for each section of road. The easement acquisition/negotiation process is administered by Dakota County. Dakota County, at this time, has not specifically identified right-of-way requirements for each parcel. Additional R.O.W. Lexington Avenue north of Lone Oak Road: West Side - Existing 1/2 R.O.W. = 33', Proposed = 40'; 4,800 sq.ft. East Side - Existing 1/2 R.O.W. = 50', Proposed = 60'; 5,200 sq.ft. Lexington Avenue south of Lone Oak Road: West Side - Existing 1/2 R.O.W. = 60', Proposed = 75'; 10,500 sq.ft. East Side - Existing 1/2 R.O.W. = 50', Proposed = 75'; 17,000 sq.ft. Lone Oak Road east of Lexington Avenue North Side: Parcel 010-50 - Existing 1/2 R.O.W. = 33', Proposed = 75' 11,300 sq.ft. South Side - Existing 1/2 R.O.W. = 50', Proposed = 75' 30,500 sq.ft. TOTAL 79,300 sq.ft. 49525A.rpt 13 AREA TO BE INCLUDED Listed below are the parcels proposed to be assessed which also abut the project: Section 2 (SW 1/4) Parcel 010-50 Eagandale Industrial Park No. 2 Parcel 151-00 Parcel 152-00 Bell Lexington Addition Lot 1, 2, 3, Block 1 Eagandale Center Industrial Park No. 2 Lot 13 Section 3 (SE 1/4) Parcel 010-77 Parcel 020-77 Parcel 030-77 Parcel 051-77 Section 10 (NE 1/4) Eagandale Center Industrial Park No. 9 Lot 1, 2, Block 2 Section 11 (NW 1/4) Parcel 010-25 Parcel 010-26 Eagandale Center Industrial Park No. 3 Lot 1-10, Block 5 III 49525A.rpt 14 ASSESSMENTS Assessments are proposed to be levied against the benefited properties in accordance with assessment policies established in the City of Eagan. A preliminary assessment roll is included in Appendix B located at the back of this report. Assessments are separated into street and sanitary sewer/water service. Sanitary sewer/water service is proposed to be assessed entirely to the benefited property they serve. Street is separated into two rate categories which are listed below: Overlay Rate (52' wide street) $ 10.56/F.F. Concrete Curb Rate $ 14.85/F.F. Street Surfacing w/Grading & Storm Sewer Commercial/Industrial Rate $108.25/F.F. The determination of the concrete curb rate is presented in Appendix A. It's expected this rate will be revised based on final bid unit prices. The street surfacing rate with grading and storm sewer is included in the 1993 Fee Schedule for Eagan. Properties proposed to be assessed the concrete curb rate include those properties on Lexington Avenue. In addition, the properties on Lexington Avenue north of Lone Oak Road are also proposed to be assessed the concrete curb rate because concrete curb does not exist north of Lone Oak Road. Properties on Lone Oak Road east of Lexington Avenue are proposed to be assessed the full rate for street surfacing with grading and storm sewer because total street reconstruction is proposed in this area. All properties are proposed to be assessed at their highest and best use which is considered commercial/industrial. Therefore, all property is to be assessed as commercial/industrial property which reflects a 52' wide equivalent street. 49525A.rpt 15 REVENUE SOURCES As previously indicated, the City of Eagan and Dakota County will enter into a cost sharing agreement for this project. Costs for right-of-way acquisition are estimated based on previous acquisitions by Dakota County. A summary of City/County cost allocations is presented in the following table: City of Eagan Dakota County (Percentage) (Percentage) Street (Grading, surfacing, utility ec r onstruction and restoration 45 55 Traffic Signal 50 50 Bituminous Trail/Concrete Walk Existing Lone Oak & Lexington 45 55 Lone Oak E. of Lexington N. side 0 100 Lone Oak E. of Lexington S. side 100 0 Storm Sewer Catch Basins & Catch Basin Leads 45 55 All other 100 0 Sanitary Sewer/Water Main Adjustment 45 55 Sanitary Sewer and Water Service 100 0 ROW & Construction Easements 45 55 49525A.rpt 16 City of Eagan Dakota County Total Street $270,000 $330,000 $ 600,000 Traffic Signal 75,000 75,000 150,000 Bituminous Trail/Concrete walk 25,000 30,000 55,000 Storm Sewer Catch Basin & Leads 36,900 45,100 82,000 All Others 66,800 1,200 68,000 Sanitary Sewer/Water Main Adjustment 27,000 33,000 60,000 Sanitary Sewer/Water Service 8,000 --- 8,000 Right-of-way 90.000 110,000 200,000 TOTALS $598,700 $624,300 $1,223,000 Revenues from the proposed street and utility service assessments are listed below: Street $227,649 Sanitary Sewer & Water Service 8,000 TOTAL $235,649 Based on these assessments, approximately $363,000 ($598,700 - $235,649) will be required from the major street fund and trail dedication fund to cover the remaining City of Eagan share for this project. 49525A.rpt 17 PROJECT SCHEDULE Present Feasibility Report October 20, 1992 Public Hearing (continued from November 17, 1992) January 19, 1993 Approve Plans and Specifications Winter 1993 Open Bids/Award Contract Spring 1993 Complete Construction Fall 1993 Assessment Hearing Summer 1994 First Payment Due with Real Estate Taxes May 1995 49525A.rpt 18 APPENDIX A ASSESSMENT RATE CALCULATION BITUMINOUS OVERLAY RATE (52' Wide Street) Rate/F.F. 0.20 Gal. Bituminous material for tack coat @ $1.50/gal. $ 0.31 0.30 Ton Bituminous wear course @ $14.00/ton 4.20 0.02 Ton Bituminous material for mixture @ $130.00/ton 2.60 $ 7.11 10% Contingencies .71 $ 7.82 35% Legal, Engr., Admin. & Bond Interest 2.74 TOTAL $10.56 CONCRETE CURB RATE Rate/F.F. 1 C.Y. Common excavation @ $2.00/C.Y. $ 2.00 1 L.F. Concrete curb & gutter @ $5.00/L.F. 5.00 2 S.Y. Sodding @ $1.50/S.Y. 3.00 $10.00 +5% Contingencies 1.00 $11.00 +30% Legal, Engr., Admin. & Bond Interest 3.85 TOTAL $14.85 49525A.rpt 19 APPENDIX B PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL LONE OAK ROAD (DAKOTA CSAFI 26)RECONSTRUCTION PROJECT 601A ASSESSMENTS PARCEL ASSESSABLE RATE LONE OAK LEXINGTON SERVICES TOTAL FOOTAGE PER FF ROAD AVENUE ASSESSMENT Section 2 (SW%) Parcel 010-50 269.72 108.25 29,197.19 3,790.00 32,987.19 Bell Lexington Addn. Lot 1, Block 1 (1) 265 (2) 25.41 6,733.65 Lot 1, Block 1 200 108.25 21,650.00 (3) 28,383.65 Lot 2, Block 1 140.95 108.25 15,257.84 15,257.84 Lot 3, Block 1 13. 1.33 108.25 14,216.47 14,216.47 Eagandale Center Industrial Park No. 2 Parcel 151-00 260 (2) 25.41 6,606.60 6,606.60 Parcel 152.00 90 (2) 25.41 2,286.90 2,286.90 Lot 13, Block 1 110 108.25 11,907.50 11,907.50 Section 3 (SE 34) Parcel 010-77 134 (2) 25.41 3,404.94 3,404.94 Parcel 020-77 101.59 (2) 25.41 2,581.40 2,581.40 Parcel 030-77 112 (2) 25.41 2,845.92 2,845.92 Parcel 051.77 272.71. (2) 25.41 6,929.56 6,929.56 Section 10 (NE /4) Eagandale Center Industrial Park No. 9 Lot 1, Block 2 300.02 10.56 3,168.21 3,168.21 Lot 2, Block 2 96.98 10.56 1,024.11 1,024.11 Section 11 (NW 34) Parcel 010-25 261.14 10.56 2,757.64 2,757.64 Parcel 010-26 30 10.56 316.80 316.80 Eagandale Center Industrial Park No. 3 Lot 1, Block 5 100 10.56 1,056.00 1,056.00 Lot 2, Block 5 100 10.56 1,056.00 1,056.00 Lot 3, Block 5 (1) 250 10.56 2,640.00 Lot 3, Block 5 100 108.25 10,825.00 (4) 13,465.00 Lot 4, Block 5 210 108,25 22,732.50 22,732.50 Lot 5, Block 5 100 108.25 10,825.00 10,825.00 Lot 6, Block 5 100 108.25 10,825.00 10,825.00 Lot 7, Block 5 100 108.25 10,825.00 10,825.00 Lot 8, Block 5 100 108.25 10,825.00 10,825.00 Lot 9, Block 5 100 108.25 10,825.00 10,825.00 Lot 10, Block 5 40 108.25 4,330.00 4,330.00 TOTAL 184241.50 43,407.73 3,790.00 231,43923 (1) Includes 75' Corner Lot Credit (2) Assessment Rate = Bituminous Overlay and Concrete Curb (3) Total Assessment for Lot 1, Block 1 (4) Total Assessment for Lot 3, Block 5 49525A.rpt 20 4 14,4114411.,411..0, .141 74,35 MI VI 5154.441.I 51411.10 lirlft 1:0110.• .4.;;..,.: IV. 101111*Oeinf lit NNN 8111.YM ,MAUS ANYLNYS W3M3S NNOI.S n.......n,'red Is V1.09 'ON 103PONd ALIO a 14 CAM., I?NIP0PLIV otioisog irwil.:11 OnN3AV NaLONIX31) 24 'N'3 ? '""' ,...T7"..."'" '"'.."=?Pr'''''7.77.11:".n.7.1 11......... ..uPeucie 111 V_LOS3NNI II 'NVDV3 ..,,,,,,,, 41 LIVIrtt ECI140..TM It,214 1.1.4.11.1 MR.I_ :: CC ■ 01 Si O31 l'i 1 . ? _ 1 . I 1 In 1 . r , "4 o \ • • N. F 0 — . I ' z - j' . I ._ — _ ... _... c) II o w 01 sw ix •,:- -1 ._______________________D- 0 --4---1 1 11111 -- ---- . i 0 --4 , ° 0,0(D I Plr' 9 • iti C)-- : . .. - -- . .., . (--- (_ 0 ..i. t___________. . ___. _ __ ....._. 00 zo 0 I il=r— .. ;• A 0 I _____..____....__ ____________________. I , I ,k 0 r------ • . I i • ___ ______ I • i I 11. ° ; r•--• _ I 0 i j 0 I 71 ; 6 I i ; , ,, 0 I I c 1 , ill I I e•—■ ./ ii ll 4 . i Z - .•, : . oc.) 0 ,d ' iN , i _r 0 • 9 ..... , w : 1 - I k.•______, >_, --1 ; ... 1- ----1.--T-.-=,=._ -.3 INIMINWIEN•11..olng•Milin W q i I . , Z i I - 0 i - —.--o-..- 1..... '"1,141.i 11),_— ■ le o ex..4:a go a....%raa to am • — '0.—:=,_,---- I—, 0 - ---- i • ‘ \ 1. Z X i i . I • pcxxs )100 Dual\ \\,, 1 I . !A 1 R ' — 0 • •I, 1 .: ' , 4 ......1 1 1 : k ro 1 , 1 . 1..,-'; i 11 .--■-■-..-1 .4. _________,________ ; 1 N r: . .• • 4.4 4' C..) I ! 1-II ____-_._- - --i-• i , a It . - i • 1 . 1 1 41 i I. i • . . .. I iii 1 RI, ir ../ Ile I . / - 11 0 r / / i I 1.. ',... NM // .:s c:1 ... . / 1 / ,, .i9 _ • . . llii• - 1 . I • ......_ _ I . . 1 i . ------- ----( Y II1 T ••••____ • JO AMIACITIID")\ l . J. ______.__IT-.. ;■-1-- : 0: 0: —t---1 II —I ' 1 a ,...1 ,i)! Mx ,...E ., n.., �...., .w , mo •••uNM•@+d IS 9ajafoo9By'I L oo+B6 o 00+19 YIP arm. 9 46380OV iL'S V608 'ON 133r d -S1N31f3A0iIdNl A1t11111 a `. ,,,,,,u„,,,,n I„s„ euaaoy (9z 'HYS'0) OVO8 >IVO 3N01 )t'A _ ,— +..� n r' �„„„ro, ,,,3 oafeeuog YIOS3NNfW .NVDV3 1 S g m ry _ 0, cc oo col co co co "" Spry$ i ;..a fcn.133NS 335 —moo—Z--- g s d = ' 00+96 3Nn Fto1Vf 1 .-� \ [[//,477 :It, M ---' /� 00':4•[8(I1S'Jd - fri V o Y - m-- _ IL igm ,3 • O O - \ I I[ II \i 4,T..;) 0 0 i o t- I f i� W V Z O 1 T U Z , ' --------- \ I � I \I -- m + (1 *1 ;; W CO \ II Al I Pt ¢ 7d 4 N a ■ II ' I 11 ■ W £B7.£+ a cs PS '03 c3)1 � 1\Ii 16 I ! T ---In- I 'r— 5 £1 'PN 'o3 --- - ----- ro"� 2 r. — H LO 90 t. - - ti _j 0.,.., 1,, , 1.?,,'1"-a-FATT-3"--n——*-IS Ilt `1 �\� ;o`'�anVtuol6ufxei a Fa dI ;III N j r r tb� { ;..,., ;G v o F, I' J� I• i , r r r (n II _ 1Y 11 ®O f 0,....ei ,: 1 11I z° ' 1 I z rk O I 07 // I!S . `, .1 e _ , ., ���� I III •• , — '. ® II,i j g ; a 1i f' 2 11 1I• Z I,i, , r 01 . r.t 4 1,.ill e, 1 , —J k\s\si w i�� S Ii 1 _ Eon 8 Y , I,,,Ii i Mir )1,-_ a i CCCC�7777 I�I�'i 8 n _— -f-uolciW 1 --. co 3NrINItl11- a ,1 I , 1 / I '1 n ro ,. 'ia uo}�H 1 f;. ,t I I , I 02 3•111N/V14 , I - I. i ti•BS•98-ro1S'3'd I I -' eU {{k II 1 i i6 i! 3NI1NIPN I L4 80498- '1'd 1 1,I I■ 11 f '-- - —___ aD •.-e *I!I' I+� ox r rY-ar :4-.1; ' 1 :°xa I .., :;:ii i de .,I it 3NIlNrtlN I'�i I I 00.5 1S 3d ;- . y ,,11 I I' 1 I o ` I; I ti;I I, 74 lE I ,1 ? r 111 I 2 8 o 0 "� wro, ai+xai , ua te!Bpotty k31. VIM 'ON 133 DSd-S1N3V13A02!d111 Ai11Ufl s 00+913 MS .41.l 1174730 Jo,m,,u„,,,,,a m„ ouetoy (9Z 'HYS'0) OF/02! ?NO 3N01 mosanrod rot,raw Icripand-s°°a'°" °, .: 460,400,9.000003 ooJ!souog d10S3NNiW 'Nd`Jtf3 s 01 03I 21 °I CO CO CO, Wli CO; COI tO CO PaAOU7a8 ern 133,0 Mil ®—,,domii— g a9 o} oo+tll '3281 H31.61 g 1 (161x3) OP-H0 xDd"8U0'rl 11111 V'P� , i i J — N �A_ I I II I I z --dry f• "I •t3 '7DO t ..I _.—e 1 m —tg+ _ —� W Ir 1.1 I,. i1' . € 1 1 /11 III III * ■i W ' �' I I j I II o 'ij as a �—._ h "�r II'� I I EL CO Z "" - - '� i I a�' r z 'd 1101 EL 7 Ifi�I I,I�i o sees± -- w i 11 �Q re liII I 4P o `f I I I ' 1141 i1 I ooa 1, 0 ■ 'l. 11.11 114 01 O CT' -- "?fix ( r` 6 1e I L Q.) }ueuJUSpoaa : h 'a-I1 '4° O Pa60doid :l -�Il l �I hJ L- p N .PA18 5u04smuy 4I9N ;, .11 u 1.n,r� __ ` - z — f�17 °�• -_- - — _ _ _ MI iii ra .. 1�1�►. !I-.s.AS ".e t 8 t— 0 'DN6 6 wn/6 otJ'd - , _ , le p ,• l ."' ++ 'PM®5uoi}y ZION I O D_ o o .111 11 �..I ' J ± - ' II b c� (n o 11 Ix o a 1 II lid NI ° , U 0 "--1 -'3 4+11 II 0 ( 0 z c LII I I n �0 ® In w ,, j ii �.Irl 7 ; 0 1. w 467 Q O 1 ' 1 _ _ 0 �r ' - 0 w . is . Q A _ 0_ i I j co / - © m �C Z i ` m ^ ' w —& f- -�___..f F ' .....1 i xi � i 14 .., ■., i,, . _ 1. \ , ` !''a• I ;I o 1 . 4;A$ 1:--- . ----..: N, i 1 P'41-0 , ' b1S'1'd 5 lyJ Iji d w . ,rY ; i i( I .`ru�'d92.66-tl1S'J'd 1 t Q --� t 11 ' �--_ • « I p ' O B/'9Z.66.. \ , 075.+ o 'rye [C'7� "1 VIS'1'd,, �, mmmS, , ones z : I" i 9 ' ,, ' 1,11 :;, ..„.,,, ..., II r . IP! c6 1 I --- ,,-....,-,-.,-.z ----,.."—.. .— ., , m 00+98 o 0 0 o a'3Nri 1401Y11 2 Izn 12356 3361 .1,. m EAGANDALE CENTER o INDUSTRIAL PARK No. 9 8 1 i l' i 1 'i _ 051-77 030_77 020-77 010-77 2 o i; � 272.71 ' L� 2' 101 .52' 134' 96.98' 300.02 �_ , , • * 0. O e i ` * POND CREDIT �,, �.-" "i►''y"" d _ 1Q 1_5 o, i � 1 _ -TAT= .—. - . ,Ay Areity 4051,- "AISKITAgar t\NN � � '\ \1\` �'.\ \ , r - ----X265' 60' _ 190' 30' 261.401'--- 100' 100' I i 1 1-00 151-00 152-10 o10-26 010-25 1 2 ` *75' C.L.C. ; 75' C.L.C. EAGANDALE . CENTER ® 3 INDUSTRIAL PARK No. 3 0 100 200 '''' *75' C.L.C. =CORNER LOT CREDIT Scale in feet C.R. 43(LEXINGTON AVENUE) < �. ;- .�' .:.y"' <�y``.'. V :: \:".sxsS. tiY ,;,.,j.II'_CtN'.'.z: '"`i;::£"::`�3:" uiFG,C :`2. `3 .,�---,""4+.... r."0:�,- :� . .�.�..C ..mac.. ,...<. 3,4,0:,, .:a� .. �. �:.;..,,\ ,<,,,2'`.„>�.q r, :. ♦ �pil a� � uu�e'e,�iF ?#f°.":b�t�i�`,a2h.LtiF",,<.s'�Y�`.`�}' _,....,.., - «a..<,...:<.:'i...w.,....�,.F.'Fi� wt.'F,�:���t.....i4xx�? �?� �� v.v' ,oA.���i�33<���V�Q .i.�.,. �.., :,cM ,�,`�A ..C,� . C 2k� 2. '�\., � .��' EAGAN DALE EAGANDALE CENTER BELL CENTER PARK No. 10 LEXINGTON ADDITION PARK No. 2 2 05017c,05017c, e t �"11 I 2 it 3 010-50 13 L—J � I e 20 14�� '5 a ff3 :33' 269.72 110' I I 90 95 -— , _ 100 105_ EAGANDALE 1 Q 100' I 210' 100' ©100' 100' 100' 10# ' 40' CENTER ® if 0 EAGANDALE CENTER PARK No. 9 X INDUSTRIAL PARK No. 3 Bituminous Overlay Rate ($10.56/FF) E22L.. Z Overlay & Concrete Curb ($25.41/FF) 0 100 200 e∎0.AA, Reconstruct Rate ($108.25) iiiiirTgiiiiieTnsia Scale in feet Bonestroo STREET ASSESSMENTS Rosene EAGAN, MINNESOTA FIGURE 6 win Anderlik & Ul Associates LEXINGTON AVE. (C.R. 43) & Engineers Architects LONE OAK RD. (C.S.A.H. 26) PROJECT NO. 601A 2335 West Highway 36 Page 5/EAGAN CITY COUNCIL MI UT£5. • i May 4, 199. U. Final Plat. Bur Oak Hills 3rd Addijipn • • It was recommended that the final plat foi`But;E3alc:Hills 3rd Addition be approved. V. Final Plat.Eng troms Deerwood 2nd Addition It was recommended that the final plat for.Engstroms Durwood 2nd Addition be approved. Before a motion was made regarding the Consent Agenda,Councilmember Wachter indicated he would not vote against the Humane Society in favor of the Eagan Hockey Assodation's gambling license. Awada moved, Hunter seconded,a motion toiapprove the Agenda as amended. Aye: 5 Nay: 4 EXCEPT: Item L. license, Gambling, Eagan:HOckeY AisOciatiOn for Pull-Tabs at Cherokee Sirloin Room. Aye: 4 Nay: 1 (Wachter) gepp :Fwd PROJECT 601A/LEXINGTON & LONE OAK INTERSECTION Mayor Egan introduced this item•::a::::Project 601A (Amended), Lexington & Lone Oak (Intersection/Signalization Improvements). After the CityAdministrator provided brief background on this item, Director of Public Works Colbert summarized the:.project's history.. He noted that this improvement is.a part of both the County's and the City's five-year plans.::He stated.that tl a total estimated cost is SI. million with the City responsible for approximately half. Of the City's:share :apprinimately S178,000 is expected to be assessed. Director of Public Works Colbert then referred to the objections that had been received from the adjacent property owners relating to the design of the intersection. He discussed the proposed improvements to the intersection and the traffic volume. Mr. Colbert noted the accidents that have taken place at the intersection but said no detailed analysis had been done as to what type of accidents, rearend, broadside, . etc., had taken place. Mr. Colbert turned his attention tQ the net4at>s and:the::restricted access. He indicated that attempts had been made to mitigate the medians;however,Dakota County had determined that the length of median was necessary to accommodate the speed and amount of traffic through':this intersection. In closing, Mr. Colbert pointed out that Mark Hanson from Bonestroo, Rosette;Anderlik.:& Associates, was present to address any issues, as well as Dave Everds and Pete Sorenson of Dakota CouiiO. Before opening the bearing to the public, Mayor Egan noted that early in the process, the trailwav system had been deleted from the project west of Lexington and north of Lone Oak all the way to Knox. He said the rhaqe was made in order to preserve trees and lawns;however,it was unlikely any further modifications to the proposal would be entertained by Dakota County. He said.the.City was cognizant of the issues but was willing to listen. Patrice Batagglia,Dakota County 40;:tas`t41t*xis attending the public hearing to show good faith. She stated that the project had taken i ifi ie and:slie:itiii ware of the differences of opinion on what should be done. She further stataed she was aware some residents_.are unhappy with the project but added that government must look at the big picture. She said it was not aboikfriendships but what would best represent the needs of the entire community. The Commissioner allowed that the City and County must be sensitive to transportation issues but realistic as well. She said there is no compromise for safety and the needs of certain roads and certain improvements will not go away. Page 7/EAGAN CITY COUNCIL MINUTES: • ''> May 4, 1993 City Councilmember Wachter reiterated his concerns abc ut the impact of the median on the residential and commercial properties; however, his overt g:concery is;:the cost of the intersection.. He questioned whether the right turn lane would be beneficial wliei01.:ic�oirl3:oiily overload the one-lane ramp onto I-35E. He indicated the money would be better spent to improve'the ramp onto I-35E from Yankee Doodle Road. He then asked how Opus Corporation could be paying 81% of the assessments. Mark Anderson said that 62% of the front footage belongs to one of the companies he and ' a$ ngs pant represents an if one considers the dollars they have alread •paid and the e dollars they will be it amounts to 81% of the total. Further ' p y assessed, discussion took place regarding the costs; however, Mr.Everds reassured:the:Co! r .ber that costs are no higher than any other project of this nature. Pete Sorenson of Dakota County said that_.any problems with I-35E will not be solved by this improvement but the project should also not be vetoed ots..that basis. `He indicated that such problems are best handled by the State. Mr. Everds added that'tht.:County: ►x ciid:.be happy to join the City in working with MnDOT on effecting improvements to interstate access in €Iie::City. • Councilmember Hunter stated there had been unprecedented public input on this project and the City had bent over backward for the benefit of a few. He said they now owed it to the rest of the people who must use this intersection to signal;7p it. Councilmember Masin cited a total lack of:impact of the citizens and the City Council on this project. She said sbe would like to see a rhange whereby.:the::County Board and the Physical Development Board Committee would field the process. But even though it is a lot of money,she would vote for the project because as'-part of the industrial park the improvements are needed. Mayor Egan stated that the City Council has.made every effort on this project to alleviate the concerns or le abutting property owners, but, he addc. ,.the issues of safety, traffic management and convenience must al be considered. He said the City has sent the project back to the County a number of times in an effort to change the design but the County has indicated they have done all they can do. The Mayor dosed by saying the Council had to balance all factors and they have tried; however, it is time to move forward. Awada moved, Hunter seconded, a.m,otion .to..close the public hearing and approve Project 601A (Amended) for the intersection/signalization iJexi t nAveuuc:arid Lone Oak Road and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute all related cooperative agreements-wiii Dakota County. Aye: 4 Nay: 1 (Wachter) There were no Old Business items. METROPOLITAN AIRPORTS COMMISSION LEGISLATIVE POSITION Mayor Egan introduced this item as consideration of iccommendation by the Airport Relations Commission to support House File 431 and.Seaat :Fi :308:;txsac.Cruing Metropolitan Airports Cornmcsion representation. City Administrator Hedges:hided that;t :O fl caion has indicated that additional direct representation would be beneficial and would respond to the current situation in which a single representative attempts to balance the interests of Bloomington, Eagan, and Mendota Heights. After brief discussion,Awada moved,Wachter seconded,a motion to approve a recommendation by the Eagan Airport Relations Committee to support HF 431 and SF 508 to provide for direct representation on the Metropolitan Airports Cornmiaion for cities immediately adjacent to the airport. Aye: 5 Nay. 0