The URL can be used to link to this page

4232 Blackhawk Rd - Former HomeEAGAN i OWNSHIP BUILDING PERMIT Owner .... 00-.-A-..... - .................................... -•----•--•-- •--------- Address (present) ._ ............... --•------•-----• • .. ... .. ......•-----------•----...----•--- Builder ........ S?_................. °.......... -......... ................ Addsess ........... ---•--••--•-?--...--••-? •--•-•-••--•-•---•--•---••--••-••-•---• •-••--•-••-•--.. DESCRIPTION AT° 3141 Eagan Township Towa Hall Date ..... 1-................ - ? --•-°-----°--•....... 5lories To Be Used For Fron! Depih Height Esi. Cosi Permi! Fee Remarks 0-71 su-, '?'.--`..?..'??'`' ?m `r?0 ? `-? ''? /? ` °?' /'`s?° ? ? r ?o ? ? " U ° LOCATION 113.3"-o Streei, Road or other Description of Locaiion ? Lot Block Addition os Trac! ? G7o C.?o -2- ,; This permii does noi suihorize the use of streets, xoads, alleys or sidewalks nor do-es it give the owner or his agent the right to creafe any situation which is a nuisance or which presenYs a hazard to the health, safeiy, convenieace and general welfare !o anyone in the communilp. THIS PERMIT MUST BE KEPT ON THE PF?EMISE WHILE THE WORK IS IN PROGAESS. This is to certify, 3hat.... e??..... . --- S-- ....................................... has permission to erect a.... .............. - ? .......... ° upoa ---•-•-• °-•-- ---...--•. - the above described premise subject fo the provisions of the Building Ordinance for agan Township adopted April 11, 1955_ _...---•-• (1.i....... -.... ?. ........ % _' Building Ittspecfor -A is EAGAN TOV1!"N S H I P BUILDING PERMIT , ? owne= ----+..???tw?r.=---,?--- ----•-?---- -;;----------•------------------ --- Address (present) ?? -?? ? ? • •••-•=.:`:=----•••••••-••°-•••--.._t!??..:-•--- Buildes ....r.?::?:°? ...• ......................................•••••-••...........••••••-•......_.. Address .....................••....................................................................... DE3CRIPTION N? 2321 Eagan Township Town Hall Date ....d ./...> ............................. S3ories To Be Used For Froni Depth Heigh! Esi. Coa! ' Pssmit Foe Re:narks °-`' LOCATION Street, Road or olher Description of Location I Lo! Block Addition os Tract ? o-w) ()?? '? ? E ci- ri A ? C: Dy This permit does aot aulhoriae the use of streets, roads, alleya or sidewalks aor does it give the owner or his agent the right to create anp situation which is a nuisance or which presents a hazard to the health, safely, convenience aad geaeral welfare 3o anyone in the community, THIS PERMIT MUST BEPT?Q?T THE PREMISE WHILE THE WORK IS IN PROGRESS, This is to ceriify, ihai__.... ---- ,_IL??•-••-•-----•-•---------•-•••-•---..has permission to erect a---...-c:?--=•-••-••--- --•- upoa . ............... . the above described premise subject to ihe provisions of the Building Ordinance for Eagaa Townshi adopted April 11, 1955. .......................... - • •- - • !?`?::-:'•-••-•••••••--•---•--.. Per ..................... ?': :??•?.-??C:-------.P- .............. •• ....._...-•-•-........... Chairmaof Tn? Board Buildin Ins ector ? . ._.°..?_:?''.z.?.... Eagan Township PEfC1?fIT NO Dakota Counfy, Minnesota Dafe ---- --- --• -?/` , ---------•••..----•-•-- ? ApglBCation for Building Permit Type of building or work contemplated. Circle correct de scriptions. Residential Commercial Industrial Othe --•-••••. ??-•--•---'?-- ?! ------------------------------------- -• -....................................... 8ui1 Ealargs Alter Repsir Install Move Wreck Other------------------ ---------- ----------•---•-.-------....----••-•-•-----. Dimensions•-•-•.._?..X_?..?.- ............. Cost.-/09? . ..-••••-••••-... Details or remarks---------••-• --•--••--•--•••----•-•--....------•-..---- •--•-•••-•••-•---•-----••-----------••---••--••--•--••••••------•---.-•--•--•-••-•-..._...---••••--•-••-••-•------••-•...-•--------- Location Nuanber 54reet ? Between what cross slreets I Sizo ? Est. Valuation Lo! Block Addit:on Rearrangement or Tract Owner ly-----• G.?-----•-------•-----•---•---•--°-----. Address . ?---?-----------•-----------------------•.-•-••----------° ConYractor -----? ?----••-------•-_............................................. Address ........ --•--- -•-•-----•-•--••------°------------------------•-------•----•------------------ The undersigned hereby makes application for a permit !o $ do work as herein specifisd, agreeiag to do all work in strict Total fee collecfed. accordance with the building ordinance adopted April 11, 1955 by t ag ownsh' Boar f S erviso . Permi4 fees are not refundable. ? -- ----•-- -••-••--- - - •..... ----•-----°--•-- • - •? ....... .............. -•-•-•------°-- 5igned CITY of EAGAN BUILDING PERMIT owri.r ..._......1.?.?-.?4??'.? :....................t. Addreas (presen!) ..? ......... ?..?.?.?..?. ?.? .fA.?? Builder .................... C4-'r._.<....r .......................................... .......• .........................•-•.....•••.................•••••••.........•••...........••- DESCRIPTION ? i? N2 3766 3795 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, Minnesota 55122 454-8100 Dals..??.••-.?Q......7,? .............. Stories To Be Used For Front Depth Heigh! Est. Cost Permi! *e Romarks / 1'? ?? r Y? o? b 'q 0 ,?t?d ? js 0 q ? LOCATION Streel, Road or oiher D'escription of Localion ' Lo! Block Additioa or Traa! ? --/ L, ? ?. ?? 660, This permit does noi suihoriae the use of sfree2s, roads, alteys or sidewslks aos does it give the ownes os his sgen! the right io create any situaiion which is a nuisance or which presents a haaard !o the health, safely, conveaiance and general welfare !o anyone in the cotnmunity. THIS PERMIT MUST BE KEPjT ON ?fi/Fi REMISE WHILE THE WORK IS IN PROG This is to certify, that?kZ!'4--1•?-.._.5.?!.P..???!.f ................... has permission to erect a._..! _upoa the above described remise subject to the provisions of all appl' inances for the City f. Eagaa. f ........... .. /"' .••r..Z..-. -•. •-• ........ ............ ..... Per ..... .• •••••-•-•-•.?•• •-•--=--•••-•-••-•••-•.............................. ?'..••--• --....•--.. .... Mayor $uildiny Iaspectos This request void 121 months frocn 18 W ??? ? ? la 6 z4'QO 103 0 -3 34`t -f> qa, ob Request Date ? ?^ ?7 Fire No, Rough-ii2 Inspection Re ired? ?Ready Ncw Q Wil1 Notify, Inspec- r 1?"` 1<? ~U *C-- ?Yes ?No _ tor When ReadY ?-Licensed Electrical Contractor I herebv reRuest inspection of above 4XOwner electrical work installed at: Street Address, Box or Route No. ?a&,^ a,4 City fl,", ection o. Township Name or No. Range No. County Occupant (PRINT) ? Ph ne No. ???? Power Suppiier Address - ? - Electrical Contractor (Company Name) ?a E_ t- CQbtractor's License No: Mailing Address (Cont?ctor o, 0 - ner Making InstaiI.atioln ) Authoriz d ignature C ntra)?g /Making Installation) Phone Number ?y 4?q"?j [ _-zo MINN A STATE BOARD OF ELECTRICITY 7HFS INSPECTION REQUEST WILL NOT , Griggs-Medway Bldg. - Room N-181 BE ACCEPTED 6Y THE STATE 80ARD 7827 University Ave., 3t. Paui, MN 55104 UNLES3 PROPER INSPECTION fEE IS. . Phone (612) 297-2111 ENCLOSED. REQUEST FQR ELECTRICAL IIVSPECTION 2,75`„?8 111, See instructions for completing this form on back of yeflow copy X" 88e!or44I0,iirk Covered by This Request ES-00001-03 3 34`7 3 New Add Rep. Type of Building Appliances Wired -Equipment Wired Nome Range Temporary Service Dupfex Water Heater Lighting Fixtures Apt. Bui Iding Dryer Electric Heatin Commercial Bldg. Furnace Silo Unloader Industrial Bldg. Air Conditioner Bulk Milk Tank Farm Other Specify Other(SUecifyl er eci Other Other Compute lnspection Fee Below # - Fee Service Entrance.Size #i Fee Peeders/Subfeeders # Fee - Circuits - 0 to 100 Am s 0 to 30 Am s j2!4,00 0 to 30 Am s ` 101 to 200 Amps 31 to 100 Amps ? 31 to 100 A s Above 200 Amps Above 100_Amps Above 100_Am s Transformers Remote Control Circ. Partial%Other Fee Signs Speciai Inspect+on $ -OEs vzb Remarks e4 OT FEE « dr- ?/ Rough-in Date ? 1, the Electrical nspector, hereby tif th t th b Final s ? ? e?.y ? ? cer y a e a ove i ection has heen e'• - - - '-/ - ade. This request void 18 m onths from L--- - - CITY OF EAGAM Remarks q"04 R6 aao,tio,, Seetion 29 Lot a,k Owner Dcxpoll ? ?` streec 4232 BLACKHAWK ROAD Parcel 10-02900"030-0 state ?GAN MN SSI22 :5"SA Improvement Date Amount Annuat Years Payment Receipt Date STREE7 SURF. - ' a STREET RESTOR, ' GRADING SAN SEW TRUNK 1970 722.62 28.90 25 SEWER LATERAL L t ,L-(481°..4l: Lk5:43=- _P,°..' .1.. WATERMAIN 22 6.40 151.76 1.5 WATER LATERAL i WATER AREA ,( 1977 9$4.20 65:61 Is . . ? d' ,,?.rr '? Q,e? .tI , ? ,;:;f d•? . STORM SEW TRK 1 ?, .?, ?, L ? ? ., - ' SYORMSEWLAT 198 19 , ? b.1 _ 17 ' CURB & GUTTER SIDEWALK STREET LIGHT WATER CONN. ' BUILDING PER. ' SAC PARK CITY OF EAGAN Remarks `?-? haf'? - ??69& AdO,iclon.-, Section 29 Lot eik Parcel 10 02900 030 05 t J-k.;`.,4 !.. S4 E street 423$ B1aCkhaWk Rd. State 1''-?agari,MN 55122 Own r?&=, C-' ? ?vn ??l o -A fmprovement Date Amount Rnnual Years Payment Receipt Date STREET SURF. STREET RESTOR. GRADING SAN SEW 7RUNK 1970 459-• 3.34 2 65.$8 C007712 Z-ZS-SZ SEWER LATERAL WATERMAIN WATER LATERAI f WATER AREA ?p• Y-i 1977 . $1.06 1 S70RM SEW TRK STORM SEW LAT CURB & GUTTER SlDEWALK STREET LIGHT WATER CONN. BUILDING PER. SAC PARK CITY OF EAGAN Remarks ' 7,? aaaition. Section 29 Lot Bik Parcel 10 02900 060 05 State ?,MN 55122 ownerz'/???°??w_ 3treet 4232 B1aCkhawk Rd. Eag26t7. 1?5q4+0 'o-eL_J Improvement Date Amount Annual Years Payment Receipt Date ' STREETSURF. STREET RESTOR. GRADING SAN SEW TRUNK 1970 5•22 25 SEWER LATERAL WATERMAIN WATER LATERAL WATER AREA 1 977 2 .? 1$.? ? STORM SEW TRK ? 1$5 711 . 0 47.40 IS STORM SEW LAT CURB & GUTTER SlDEWALK STREET LIGHT WATER CONN. BUILDING PER. SAC PARK CITY OF EAGAN 3796 Pllot Knob Rood Eagpn, MN 55122 N? 73G8 PHONE: A54-89 BUILDING PERMIT ReceiPt -?e7`,-7e_j To be uud ior STClI:?AGE BLDG. Est. Value $16185t3 Dote JuTie 24 19 £32 Site Address 4232 B18C1ChSWk ROd$ E t M-3 O rec ? ccupuncy f33Q ?5 Lot Block Sec/Sub. ?eetiari 29 Aiter ? Zoning A Parcel .# 10 02900 030 05 Repoir p Fire Zone NA V Eniorge Q ri Type of Const. ae w Name _ D8x'41d HO1dE11 Move Q # $tories 1 ; Address 4232 BlaC}ChaWk ROdd Demolish ? Lengthl5!) b Ci F?7c f8ri 55122 phone 454-7196 Grode Q Depth-5$-Sq. Ft. p Name ME11tLrt1 's ApProvals -- Fees uu Address St. ClOtld ~ Cit MN Phone u°C yuW Name P?? Addreu IXZ t "' Citv I hereby acknowledge that I have reod this opplication ond stote that the informotion is correct and ogree to comply with all oppficable State of Minnesota Stotutes ond City of Eogon Ordinonces. Signoture of Pertnittee /1 Building Permii is issued to: ME''nard '$ all work shall be done in accordence with o{I,(svolicobfi Assessment Permit 122.50. Water & Sew. Surchorge 8•50 Police Plan check 61.25 Fire SAC Eng. Water Conn. Plonner Woter Meter Counc+l Rood Unit Bldg. Off, APC Total $192 • 25 on ihe express condition tFtar and City of Engan Ordinnrites. Building Officicl ???< t ?? t$hi,c:?1c? Q.^^c??.S CITY OF EAGAN BUILDING PE.RMIT APPLICATION c To Be Used For ?14Valuation Site Address : P 32 ?X,AA( flAvlf , Lot C) 3D Block Oc? Sec. fSub. -5-- A(-e YV Erect ? Parcel # : ((? C)? 1OC3 d ?o C% s Alter Repair Owner : til .? Enlarge Nbve Address: Demlish City/Zip Code: Grade -7 .rN.. Inciude 2 sets ot plan5, r 1 site plan w/el.evations & 1 set of energy calculations. Date c -- j?/_ k? OFFICE USE ONLY -- - - Occctatpancy - -:? Zoning r Fire Zone Type of Const. ? # Stories Front ft - Depth ft. Phone # : VS1- '7/ APPROVALS FEES ? Contractor: ,?f ? "/flpS Assessments Permit 7 ;a Adc?ress: ?'% Water/Sewer Surcharge ?-?, _ ' Police Plan Check , ? ---° City/Zip Cocie: Fire SAC Phone #: Eng- Water Conn. Planner Water Meter Arch.//?g.: Council Road Unit Bldg. Off. Addres5: APC City/7ip Code: + Phone # : ? ..._. ., ? _. TOTAL SKAAR & McCULLOUGH One Financial Plaza, Suite 1900 120 South Sixth 5treet Minneapolis, MN 55402 CITY OF EAGAN Administrative Offices ATTN - City Clerk 3830 Pilot Knab Road Eagan, MN 55122 tt f:ts ltl?t?e?tl?+tt?ltt?tf?t??t?#t??Se????tl?itl?ttt?l?it??ttKtttll CITY OF EAGAN Remarks ? :551 Acidifipn_ 'SeCtiOii 29 Lot_ Owner d ?NvN Street i4.'? 3-Y.. V ,If't ,.k f sII,,,k PA ?- Parcel 10-02940-070-05 EAGAN MI+I 55122 Vi-V9 P. Improvement Date Amount Annual Years Payment Fieceipt Date STREET SURF. STREET RESTOR. GRADING SAN SEW TRUNK t 1970 64.59 2.j8 25 SEWER LATERAL WA7ERMAIN WATER LATERAL WATER AREA 1977 297.31 19.82 iS I I STORM SEW TRK ? 15 STORM SEW LAT ' CURB & GUTTER SIDEWALK STREET LIGHT WA7ER CONN. BUILDING PER, Ppl $a #3766 1312 10-75 SAC PARK CITY OF EAGAtV Remarks n-a-P- -Zt---? - 47/Ao 14 ? addition ? Section 29 Lot aik Parcel 10 02900 070 05 Owner i ? ?•'' ° ? ` ? ? ? Street State --- improvement Date Amount Annual Years Payment Receipt Date STREET SURF, STREET RESTOR. GRAQING ? , j ?B S. SAN SEW TRUNK 1970 234';-09 9---24 2 79.92 C007712 2-25-83 SEWER LATERAL WATERMAIN WATER LATERAL WATERARER 1977 . ? I?H.T C OT7?.2 2-25-82 S70RM SEW TRK STORM SEW LAT CURB & GUTTER SIDEWALK STREET IIGHT WATER CONIV. 13U(LDWG PER. Q @ 0-7 SAC PARK CfTY QF EAGAN • 3795 Pilot Knob Rood Eogan, MN 55122 PHONEs 454_8100 BUILDING PERMIT ReceiPt To be used for ..•''ji.?:: },r -. ,, ''l? a ` " Est. Volue Dote utt€? - ?'? 19 ,. $ite Address . Erect Occupancy ? Lot Block Sec/Sub. Alter Q ? Zoning Parcel Repoir ? Fire Zone Eniqrge Q Type of Const. W Nome Move Q ? # Stories ; Address Demolish ? Length b Ci Phone <° 71n f. ' Grode p DePth ?' 4Sq. Ft. Ncme , Approvals Fees o uU Address C`Ct.I ' Assessment Permit Cit Phone Water & Sew. Surchorge F °C Police Plan check Nome F W Fire SAC yuZ Addreas Eng. Water Conn. <'u Ci phone Plonner Water Meter Council Road Unit I hereby acknowledge [hot I have read this upplication and stote that Btdg Off. the informotion is correct and ogree to compiy with oll applicuble . ? Y State of Minnesota Statutes and City of Eogon Ordinonces. ApC _ Totol Signoture of Permittee ,.,j 3?';;. :. A Building Permit is issued to: on the express condition thnt oll work sholi be done in occordance with all appiicable State of MWwsota Statutes ond City of Eagan Ordinonces. Building Official Parmit No. Permit Holder Misc. Permit IVo. Holder W ? Disp. Sewer Electric tnspection Date lnsp. Other Footings .?/3$;? Foundation Framing Q -/- ?? ? Rough Plbg. i Rough HVAC Inwlation Final Plbg. Fina1 HVAC Flnal . Water Describe Location: V11e11 Sewar pr. Disp. Vsi to 5 ? ?- ? ? ? ?14 o.r, 10 4/ 1 : ???? ???LUATION SOIL BORINGS PERC. TEST AAl `4D D? ?? ??T?IGN EAGAN ? R??JIEV4/ED gY M ? ??. Lemc.e- DATE .s...,? ??..q ' 03 BUILDINru' WSPEC i 10NS DEPT. ? A,r,., / J'W't ? V ?? r? SITE: .._.._-. ?_??? ? ?3. ? 1j0 ot ?t? v ? B'Y: JERI2Y SA?JBE?. Vi n?1PCA# 925 4317 O?'tice (651) 463-7434 1-?ome (651) 463-2597 FOR, fr' Y?? ..._... -- - - Boring ;Log ? ? ? . . .. ? . h .. , f? ?,x . ... ?, Date: 'Pro'ect Location: --- Client: / j . ....:?., _ Bade by: Address: ? ?• ?? - ity Borin m thod• A2 Slale ",. 7jP ,. • Uc.? ? _ ? • Pit Probe Other °??''`? Co(ot' classlflCatlon s stem: Munsell her ?l Boring Number ? • ? ? • Boring Number' • Surtace EIevatlon . ? • Surface Elevation c " Soil type at system deplh: Soil type at system depth: ? Oepth ? TeXture ?Colof. Depth Feet ? • ; .. . . , .. _? __:_ . :.. • Feet ? TeXture Colof -- ?? • . 1 -- ?? kf.?.C; X-r T?' ???,?..t . .l •? ? . " . 2 --- j4 2 -- ? , .. F. lAlZ `C 3- f0 4 --- %??f?=d°7 ?C". • ! ' -- ' 7(,8 . ¢ 6?7 5 ? 7 --- - ' . Skructure: 6locky Plat Pr{smatic :? , . Y. . None`. Slope:6'"'? % .;•.: End of boring at feet,?. Standing water tab.le: yes no Present at feet of d th • ,', . hours after boring: . - . ? . ? Mottled soil: ? • . ? ' Observed-at feet,of depth. . ' Not present in boring hale Observations and comments; , 6 -- I ? 7 --- • Sti'UCfUfe:. Bloclcy. Platy Prismatlc Nona Slope? ?? °lo . End of"boring at 5`-- feet. ? Standing water table: , yes ` no Present at ' • feet of d hours after.boring, Mottled soil: ? Observed feet of depkh. ;N'ot present In boring hole ' Ohservations and comments: Bor??g L,og Date: 'Pro'ect Location; Client: P. Address• Boring de by: late :.. , .: : ZJp.•,r; : . Uc. : Sorin method: Au er it' ` Proba Cofor classfficatian s Ste1T1: Munsell ther Boring Number ? __ ? ? ' ? ? ?• ?` Soring Number' • Surface Elevation Surface Elevatlon ? Soil type at system dep.th: ? Soil type at system depth; oePtn Textura Feet , ? . .,. . . ? . `Colof. pepth . TeXtufe .. . •,,..._ _ .. Feet COIof .liv1 ?/"7 z? ,- 2 p ,? f f 2 -_ le 3- ? 4 __- ? .? . ? . . . . . ? ___ . ? 7 --- StruCtufB: .. Blocky Platy Prfsmatlc : :.None.'.?•:.: Slope; % ' End of boring at ? feet. Standing water tab.le: yes no ? ' Presenf at ? feet of dPJ[fT ' .. . , Observations and Qo mments: . , 5 4--- Z-?? V , hours after boring: . .. Mottied soil: ' • ' Observed-at _ZZ- feet of de th: ? . Not present ln boring hole p'- 6 --- 7 •- SlfUGtUfe:. Blocky. Platy Prismaklc None , Slope; /2??,Y' % . End of boring at _ S'T feet, ' Standing water table: , yes ?'o Present at • feet of de hows after.boring. Mottled soil: = . Observed at . feet Qf de th. ' Not present In boring hole? Observations and comments; • PERCOLATZOlv TEST DATA SHEET Test hole location 1./? s? ?c S(!!?' Ilole number / Date test hole `vas prepar d ,])epth of hole bottom, Af inches Diameter of hole, inches. Soil data from test hole: - Depth, inches Soil texture .-. . .. _ . .. ._.. ,, ,•, .....-.. -- Method of scratching sidewall Depth of pea-sized gravel in bottom of hole, ?-- inches. Date and hour of initial water filling _2- 1,3 Depth of znitial water filling, -z??-- inches above hole bottom. lYrethod used to maintain 1?,,,inc s ofwater depth in hole.for at least 4 hours: /?? : ,6.l7 Perc tion test reading ma e b (date) starting a.1??ylaximum tivater depth above hole bottom durin? test, ? inrhPc Time Time Yutei-val, IYleasurement, inches Drop in water, level, inches Percolation rate, minute per inch remarks ?J . ? D >-r 41 cL.,-' `? - - percolation rate - minute per inch. PE12COY,ATZON TEST I?ATA SHEE7' Test hole location _,-)c 5,A oYe number ? Date test hole i?vas prepared gi?i-77?lepth of t?ole bottom,:2/ inches Diameter of hole, incSoil data from test hole: ' Depth, inches Soil texture ? ' ? ?' ?czC ?? c t r Z : . :........ . . .. .....---....1 c;- ? t ,.., ...,.-.. ?v? ?? ? ------------ Method of scratching sidewall Depth of pea-sized gravel in botkom of hole, ? inches. Date and hour of initial water filling °?-/y--- 3 G3>0 Depth of initial water filling, tZ? mches ab o v e h o l e b o t t o m. Method used to ma'n aiu 12 inches ofwaterdepth iu hole,for at least 4 honrs: ?c,??? ,f.Percolation test ?eading made by; 2-2-7? 3 (date) starting above hole bottom duririLy test. ? "- ? -???Maximum water depth ir?nhno I -- T •.?.,u?,a. i Time ime 7nterval, Measurement, inehes Drop in wafer, Ievel, 'rnches Percolation rate, minute per inch remarks f4 ? / G, - ? f ? ?v U , ? v . ? ? ? Percolation rate - C ? Jilute per inch. PERCOY,ATYON TEST DATA SHEET Test hole location Hole number -3 Date test hole -was pre ared _"Z-,J-o'3 -D ,epth of hole bottom,,.-?C> inches Diameter of hole, inches. Soil data from test hole: ' Depth, inches Soii texture ,`., ......,. -..__ - Method of scratching sidewall SjoU t? 1)epth of pea-sized gravel in bottom of h le, ? inches. Date and hour of initial tivater filling _??--t Depth of initial water filling, _ } / z, lnches above hole bottom. Method used to maintain 12 inches ofwater depth iu hole for at teast 4 hours: /?' _ _ //) 1 percolation test r?ading made by 7``,0"-O___- (date) starting a <'o a.m p.m: Nlaximum Zater depth above hole bottom durinQ test. ?- inIb PQ Time ? ov Time Ynterval, IVleasurement, inches Drop in water, level, inches Percolation rate, minute per inch remarks , ? i / Percolation rate - ? ?? _miuute per inch. `% a/z iwnivrnT ta7. ??WA c;FTR'ATM'FNT SYSTEM WORKSHEET A. ?,ow F EsLimated * ?S^0 gpd mcasured x 1.5= gpd SEP fTC TANI< VOLUME B. l S?"'?_? ?•'?a gallons i SOTLS (Sikc evalu?tion data) C. Depth ta restricting ltlycr ! (cet f.). Maximum clc:pth o( system C-•3 ft l;. ('crcolatii>n _ ? 1`4?'?- MPI i:. SSF sq ft/gpd ri ' ' TRENCH 13 07TOtvf, AREA i For trenches with'6 inches oi rock Uelow the e: p p A x F=?5Z' xA0 =27 Vsq ft of bottom area 10 For trenches with 12 inches of rock below the pipe: A x fi x 0.8 = x x 0.8 = sq ft of botlom area 1. For trenches witli 18 inches of rock below the pipe: AxFx0.66=. x x0.66= sqftofbotlomarea K. For trenches tvilh 24 inches of rock below the pipe: . A x F x U.b = x x 0;6•= ' sq ft of battom area ; 13LU BOTTOMAREA L f'or sctpage beds with 6 or 12 inces of rock below lhe pipe; ].S x A x F:: 1.5 x_.^.. x---- sq f lo( bo t tc) m nrca ROCK VOLUME TN CU fiT M. Rock depth below distribution pipe plus 9.5 foot times bpftom area: M=Rock depth + 6 inches x Area (H,I,J,L,K) (-57 +0.5ft))?? =2s3,cuft ROCK VOLUME YN `CU YDS N. Volume in cu ft divided by 27 M•? 27 = cu yds7?+27 =? cu yds TZOCK WLTGHT 0. Cubic yards times 1,9 = lon'?' q-, N x 1 4 = tona`'-u x 1 4tons . , • bTSTRTT3UTTON . (Chcck one based on slopc) Ikd (IGSti thJ n (,"I„ slppx) '1'rcnchts LfDrop boxcs (any slopO ! Distribution box (]evel to slightly sloping) TRF-NCH T,ENGTH P. Select trench width=,a fk 0. Uivide bollonnarea by trench widlh; (H, 1, J, or K) + P= lineal (e,?:1 ?- -- Z? <«L.t , <<el . , LA'WN AREA ? R. SeScct trench ,,pacing, ceiltcr to center =l ? fcet S. Multiply tre:ncli spacinz b,Y lincal fcet R x Q= sq ft o( 4awn area x4Q- sq ft LAYOUT (Usc; othcr sidc) 1. Sclecl ai) appropriate scale; one s(luare =tcc?. ?. Show pertinent property boundaries; right-o(-way, easements. 3. Show location of house, garage, driveway, and ail other imorovemenls,,ex.isting or proposed'• ? +PiAwk,fj'? 1) 4? !?I•l?l?l?I?l?l?l?/?i?% '? :.ti ti.t?ti.?.??ti?`?ti???\?\•\? ?,ti...ti,ti,?.?•ti?.?ti.?•.,.?•,( J?J•l?l.l /•/?: ?: • ??`•ti•ti• ti??•'?•??'?? r•?•r• i•.?.•.? {?tiftif?` ??.ti.,.,•. ,.,..,. ,.?,..?. ......... r•?•i•r• i•i•r•i• ?.ti•ti•1?ti• 1•?•?.?.? i•i?r r?? ??i?????i?:? ti•ti.??? t.C.ti.?•?•?.?.?.•..•, ?.i ?.i.?.i•i•r.r?i•i•:?i• `.ti.?. ti?ti ti•??`??.ti??.•..? r r?)? ???•i?i•?• C?} ti t } ti?y?ti??•?•?•?••. r ??) { 1•r ? ?•i.i...:, L.ti C.C{? `•?...4.?.ti.•..... t I?l?I ?•I•l?l?I?I?/?r•/? ??`.r1?ti?\.`?1??•1?\.?r\?•.?•? 1.J.r.J.l.!•Jy.J././•/•/? 1 '??ti?ti?ti?l?ti+ti•ti???1•1'1?? ? r?r??•r??•i???r?i•?•i??• ?ti?ti•ti??•ti?ti•ti?ti•?•ti••,_,. I ICII cUYCf . i -i- I kc;.c 13c1oW Lh: N:: I ..! . TRENCH CROSS-SECTIUN FTNISHED GRADE ORIGINAL GR.ADE NLk)CMUM TRENCH DEPTH ? INCHES INCHES OF ORIGINAL GR.A DE BACKFILL OVER ROCK FlI,L S OIL T O A MQ1IMUlvj OF 6 INCHES OVER ROCK I NONWOVEN GEOTEXTILE FABRIC I 2 INCHES OF ROCK OVER PIPE 1 2" OF ROCK OVER PIPE 4 INCH PIl'E 4" DISTRTBUTION PIPE ? INCHES OF 3/4" TO 2 1/2" 6- 24 INCHES 4F WASHED SEWER ROCKS WASHEI? ROCK BELOW BELOW DISTRIBUTION PII'E DISTRIBUTION PIPE ? =-? INCHES TRENCH WIDTH DAKOTA CDUNTY MIiVlMUM SEPTIC TANKj REQI.JiRE1VfENTS IN GALLOIVS f? No. Minimum Minimum Liquid Minimum Liquid Capacity with Bedrooms Liquid Capacity with Gacbage Disposal AYVD Capacify Garbage Disposal Basement Sewage Lift 2 1125? 1125 ? * 1500 (750) - {1125*) (1500 *) 3 or 4 1500* 1500 2000 * (1000) (1500 (2000 *) 5 or 6 2250* 2250 ? 3000 * ? (1500) - r225a*j pooo *I * 7, 8 or 9 3000* 3000 * 4000 (2000) ' (3000 *) (4000 *) * Multiple C?ompartments or Multiple Tanks Minnesofa Ru/es 7080 requirements in () for reference and comparison Multipie Compartment Tanks are required to have a code maintenance hole (man-hole) for each compartment. ? Designers and installers should inform home owners of the need to have all compartments pumped. As-built drawings should also reference this. Homeowners need to be able to locate all maintenance holes Tor the pumpers. Designers are required to state the correct Dakota County tank sizing for repfacement and upgrades. It is highly recommended that property transfer compliance inspections indicate whether the septic tank capacity meets the above standard. The buyer would then be informed of the need for a-dditional septic tank capacity requirements before adding a garbage disposal, basement sewage ?ift, etc. Questions regarding these items may be directed to your local Municipal Sewage System inspector, , o:\deptlemgmUwalm\nrsepcap ? .'- DROP BOX D I STR 1 BUT 1 ON SYSTEM Z? ? ,/Z- !i"" a lJ' Z. [ / ?t ? ?? \ 4 V ? ? ?.?. ? ffV / ? ? . ? N 'Ytaf i?t?? yt ,ERRY SAUBER, M.P.C.A. LIC. #925, 031? SAUgER PLUMBING 8 HEATING W. r 100 jHM $TREET FARMINGTON, MN 55024 tNORM P HM # ?25973, j Ye SCU DONF 7- --a`?.? ? ? _ l? . /?- ?? _.-- t? ? 4?,???? ? 7? 'k A city oF eagan PAT GEAGAN Mayor PEGGY CARLSON CYNDEE FIELDS MIKE MAGUIRE MEG TILLEY Council Members THOMAS HEDGES Cicv Adminis[racor Municipal Cencer: 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55122-1897 Phone: 651.675.5000 Fas: 651.675.5012 TDD: 651.454.8535 Maintenance Faciliry: 3501 Coachman Point Eagan, MN 55122 Phone: 651.675.5300 Fax: 651.675.5360 TDD: 651.454.8535 www.ciryofeagan.com THE LONE OAK TREE The symbol of strength and growch in our community May 20, 2003 MR DAROLD HOLDEN 4232 BLACKHAWK RD EAGAN MN 55122 RE: FAILED SEPTIC SYSTEM Dear. Mr. Holden: This letter is in follow up to our conversation on May 12, 2003 regarding septic effluent discharging above grade from your property. Dakota County Ordinance No. 113, Individual Sewage Treatment Systems, defines failing systems, in part, as any sewage system that discharges sewage to a seepage pit, cesspool, drywell, leaching pit, surface water, ground surface, or causes sewage back-up in to a building. The ordinance also defines an imminent threat to public health or safety as a situation with the potential to immediately and adversely impact or threaten public health or safety. Section 213.6 requires an imminent health threat to be repaired or replaced within 30 days after notification from the municipality. The Citv is repuesting that vou correct this sewa2e problem on-site bv June 23, 2003. We appreciate your efforts in resolving this situation and I will be available at 651-675- 5676 or via e-mail (mlence@cityafeagan.com) to answer any questions you have regarding the rules of the ordinance or possible contacts that may assist you in completing this project in a timely fashion. Sincerely, Mike Lence Senior Building Inspector ML/j s cc: Dale Schoeppner, Chief Building Official DAKOTA COUNTY SURVEY & LAND INFORMATION DEPARTMENT 14955 GALAXIE AVENUE GARY H. STEVENSON, R.L.S. COUNTY SURVEYOR LAND tNFORMA7ION DtRECTQR (612) 891-7087 FAX (612) 891-7031 APPLE VALLEY, MINNESOTA 55124-8579 December 3, 1997 City of Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55122 ATTN: Marilynn Wucherpfennig, Planning Department RE: Holden Property in NE'/, Sec. 29, T. 27 R. 23 Dear Ms. Wucherpfennig: The Dakota County Plat Commission met on December 1, 1997, to consider a proposal by Mr. Holden. Mr. Holden is considering purchasing the tax forfeit parcel identified as 10-02900-030-05. The parcel is adjacent to CSAH 30 and is, therefore, subject to the Dakota County Contiguous Plat Ordinance if developed. The parcel is currently in Tax ForFeit status and scheduled to be sold at public auction. Present right of way appears to meet the County's right of way guidelines for a 4-lane divided highway. Because of the short distance between Blackhawk Road and the west on ramp of I-35E, the parcel does not meet the County's Access Spacing guideline for a right-in/out access. Mr. Holden has no current plans for this parcel, but is investigating possibilities if he purchases the tax forfeit parcet. The Plat Commission would recommend an access to this parcel be from Blackhawk Road through Mr. Holden's property. The Plat Commission feels that another access to CSAH 30 at this location is not desirable and recommends that the County Highway Department request the parcel be removed from the sale list of tax forfeited properties for at least one year in order that the County has time to consider if the parcel should remain in public ownership for highway purposes. No work shall commence in the County right of way until a permit is obtained from the County Highway Department and no permit will be issued until the plat has been filed. The Plat Commission does not review or approve actual engineering design of proposed accesses and other improvements made in the right of way. The permit process reviews the design and may reauire construction of hiphway improvements not discussed during plat reviews, including, but not limited, to turn lanes, drainage features, etc. Sincerely, ? h Gary H. Stevenson Secretary, Plat Commission cc: Tom Swanson, Permits Technician Tom Colbert, Public Works Director Thomas Hedges, City Administrator Darold Holden Printed on recycled paper, 20% post-consumer ? AN EQUAL OPPORTUIVITY EMPLOYER ca /o oa9aa o7a o.s MASTER CARD LOCATION OWNER STRUCTURE AND LAND USED AS 'aXLi O PermiT No. Issued issued To Contractor Owner BUILDING PLUMBING 3?j?I • Z?? ? ? ? CESSPOOL - SEPTIC TANK WELL ELECTRICAL HEATING GAS INSTALLING SANITARY SEWER OTHER OTHER Items Approved (Initiai) Date Remarks Distance From Well rOOTING SEPTIC FOUNDATIOfV CESSPOOL FRAMING TILE FIELD FT. FINAL ELECTRICAL HEATING DEPTH OF WELL GAS INSTALLATION SEPTIC TANK CESSPOOL DRAINFIELD PLUMBING WELL SANITARY SEWER Violations Noted on Back COMMENTS: ?,Ig* J ? ? ? ? `? /o 0a9'oo 0,7o os MASTER CARD • LOCATION fJ OWNER . STRUCTURE AND LAND USED AS F Permit No. Issued Issued To Contractor Owner BUILDING PLUM8ING 13 VI,s4740 xtp f. ? CESSPOOL - SEPTIC TANK ? WELL ELECTRICAL • HEATING GAS INSTALLING SANITARY SEWER OTHER 07HER ? • Approved Items (Initiai) Date Remarks Distance From Well FOOTING SEPTIC FdUNDATION CESSPOOL FRAMING TILE FIELD FT. FINAL ELECTRICAL DEPTH HEATING OF WELL GAS INSTALLATION SEPTIC TANK CESSPOOL DRAINFIELD PLUMBING WELL SANITARY SEWER 9 COMMENTS: Violations Noted on Back /a oa9oo 07o o,g MASTER CARD ?LOCATION OWNER STRUCTURE AND LAND USED AS ..?A V A 7t, /_7 - /i Permit No. Issued Issued To Contractor Owner BUILDING PLUMBING .?--- CESSPOOL - SEPTIC TANK WELL ELECTRICAL HEATING GAS INSTALLING SANITARY SEWER OTHER OTHER Approved Items (Initial) Date Remarks Distance From Well FOOTING SEPTIC FdUNDATION ?-- CESSPOOL FRAMING ? ?-? - TILE FfELD FT. FINAL ELECTRICAL DEPTH HEATING OF WELL GAS INSTALLATION SEPTIC TANK CESSPOOL DRAINFIELD PLUMBING WELL SANITARY SEWER Violations Noted on Back COMMENTS: ? ,- ti. ? ?. ? :.r?.. . . ?? - 3830 PILOT KNOB ROAD, P.O. BOX 21199 BEA BLOMQUIST EA6AN, MINNESOTA 55121 Mayor PHC)NE (612) 454-8100 THOMAS EGAN JAMFS A. SMITH VIC El! ISON THEODORE WACHTER Cuuncil Memuers THOMAS HEDGES City Adminisirator EUG[NE VAN OVFRBEKE Ct1Y Llark June 19, 1986 Darrel Holden 4232 Blackhawk Rd Eagan MN 55122 RE: 10 02900 030 05 10 02900 060 OS 10 02900 070 OS Dear Sir: You were in City Hall r_equesting that the City remove certain special assessments from your proper.r_ies, because you were successful in appealing the amount of your assessments. The City has appeaied that decision and, based on the opinion of City's legal counsel, the City's special assessment staEf will not process any changes to the assessments on yo?ir properties. Any chanres wi11 be processed a[ter resolution of the case by the Appellate Court. If you have additiona.l questions, please contact me at the City. Sincerely, Cerald Wobschall .`-apecial Assessments GW/dk THE LONE OAK ?REE ... THE SYMBC3L OT 5TRENGTH ANT) GROWTN !N OUR (70MEv{UNI1Y BEA BLOMQWST MAV4R THOMASEGAN JAMES A. SMITH JERRY TMOMAS THEODORE WACHTER CaUNCIL MEMBERS J'une 24, 1982 Mr. Darold Holden 4232 Blackhawk Road, E$gan, MN 55122 CIT1t C?F ? 4s`? ??5;4PIL,4T:KN0B ? Qa ePN 3119' ? „? ? ?EAGAN? M?N ? x. ' PHaNE 4'S4 ? vj Iir?? .9, , . ?. AGAN ? _. ROAO " N"E50TA 'a±? : Re: Aqricultural Building on Parcel #10 02900 030 05 Dear Darold: THOMASHEDGES CITV ADMINtSTRATOR EUGENE VAW OVERBEfCE CITY CLERK When a huil8ing houses animais, it must be set back 50' from the praperty line. Piease make sure of this. Even thouqh you own all vf the parceis (10 02900 030 05, 10 02900 060 DS and 10 02900 Or 05) yoa must respect each property line. The 50' setback is a requirement of Ordinanae 52.06, Subdivision 5 A. Sincerely, Dale Peterson Building Official DSP/bar TtiE LONE OAK TREE ... THE SYMBOL OF STRENGTH AMD GROWTM IN OUR COMMUNI7Y. ?a ? HAUGE, EIDE & KELLER, P. A. ATTORNEYS AT LAW WATER ViEW OFFICE TOWER, SUITE 303 iZOO YANKEE DOODLE ROAD EAGAN, MINNESOTA $5123 PAUL Fi. NAU6E KEVIfV W. EIDE DAVID G. KELLER I.ORI M. BELIIN _ DEBRA E. SGNMIDT OCtOb@r 13, 1986 , C??Yo,- AREA ? CODE 612 TELEPNONE 456-9000 +54-4224 Mr. Thamas Hedges E?1'/V ? 07? City Administrator ? l 3830 Pilot Rnob Road Eagan, MN 55121 RE: Holden vs. Eagan Assessment Appeal Dear Mr. Hedges: Pursuant to the decision in this appeals case published in the October 3, 1986 issue of Finance & Commerce, we were able to make contact with Judge Nierengarten's law clerk in regard to the actual meaning of the decision in that case. As indicated to you before, we have successfully appealed the Court's award of $5,559.10 reducing the City's original assessment of approximatelq $27,043.37. Judge Nierengarten's clerk has confirmed our interpretation of the decision to say that the City's levied assessment is reinstated and the trial court overruled on the basis that the assessmenta do not exceed the benefit to the property. A copy of the decision has been served upon Holden's attorney to insure that any appeal time wi21 begin to run. We would request that the City Clerk advise us if there is any difficulty with the County in having the aasessment reinatated ar the stay lifted, as the case may be. Sincerely, HAUGE, EIDE 5 RELLER, P.A. David G. Keller DGR:ras cc: Eugene VanOverbeke -- - - ; --- - - _ - - - _T- -- ----- -r - i? , , , 1 . ' ? OA ?/?d32 - - - - i - - ? - - - - T ( - I . - - - , ? i I I H I I ? - - - - ? - 14 ? I 5 I ? t ? ? L???.i?•-???1L?s . . ? . .. . .._ . ` -- _.. - . ? ? ? I ° ? ? ?/? I - ? - - _ I ? ?? 19 ? W I 170 0 " I ? , 21 __ 1 ?jj122 L?fl1LE? ?Y'--Ll/=?tciQ? ?ilYllL- -? ? ? ? -- ? t i I I I ?'17 Z If - I - - -- I-- ? , - 0 I - ' - ? - - - - - - - _ .? _ 11 1 1I - ? 35 S I 2i II I ? ? t' ; -II Zj ? :s 9 L 30 L-31 0 3 Z ? 34 j --.? - I !i]5 ? --- ? -- - 7d. j - P -36 - I 4 - - ---- , - - - .. - - - -- - . - ---- - - - -- - - - -- - -- - - _ I -- - ' - - - ' . . . ? - ? - • - - - - - ? 10 .:H -_ • . _.'_'...__.. . 11--r-i't 1 I _1'-t'...._7_-_?_t _ 3 ? SAC 10/9/84 F. PROJECT 317, BLACKHAWK ROAD STREETS & UTILITIES 1. Jay Tscherne (10-02900-040-05 2. James Ashworth (10-02900-010-10) 3. Robert Keuger (10-02900-010-08) 4. Darold Holden (10-02900-030-05) (10-02900-060-05) (10-02900-070-05) BACKGROUND INFORMATION While each of the above property owners have submitted individuals appeals/ objections, they are all neighbors affected by the same street and utility project. Therefore, it would be beneficial to discuss all four property owners' situations collectively to avoid any repetition. Project 317 provided for the installation of sanitary sewer, water, storm sewer and street improvements on Blackhawk Road from Diffley Road to the northside of I-35E/Blackhawk Road overpass. In order for the State to construct the 48-foot-wide bridge over I-35E, the City had to commit to a concurrent construction of Blackhawk Road from I-35E to Cliff Road and also to Diffley Road. Due to the fact that Blackhawk Road is classified as a municipal State-aid street, certain design standards had to be complied with. Prior to permanently improving a street to its ultimate design section, all underground utilities have to be installed. Subsequently, Project 317 was initiated and constructed during 1983. These four property owners along Blackhawk Road are existing residents who did not petition for improvements and expressed their objections at the time of the public hearing and have followed through with written objections at the final assessment hearing which was held on September 18, 1984. Enclosed on pagesL7 through71)_ are copies of the written ob'ections submitted by these four property owners. Enclosed on page _7 y is a topographic map referencing these four property owners and the parcels under their ownership. Enclosed on page?14_ is a breakdown of the assessments associated with each property showing the frontage and areas used to determine the final assessments based on the individual rates. The City Attorney and Public Works Director have had several meetings with these property owners from the inception of the project at the original public hearing to most recently on September 24 to review the concerns with the property owners listed as fallows: 1. The project was not at the request of the property owners but rather initiated by the City over their objections. 2. The amount of the assessment exceeds the benefit to each of the parcels affected. 3. The amount of the assessments is excessive as to what each property owner can afford on a monthly/yearly basis. During the meetings with property owners, the staff has reviewed how the costs of the assessments were determined, the method used to calculate the l.< F. PROJECT 317, BLACKHAWK ROAD STREETS & UTILITIES (continued) unit rates and the amount of City participation for the various improvements. The property owners are requesting further review by the Special Assessment Committee to see if any special consideration to their unique situation through the deferment, postponement or reduction of the assessments relating to this improvement. The staff has hired Mr. Dan Dwyer as an appraiser to evaluate the increase in valuation to the property as a result of this project in relationship to the amount of the assesments. At the time of this packet preparation, this appraisal report has not been completed. Therefore, it is anticipated that this information will be made available to the Special Assessment Committee at their meeting on October'9, 1984. STAFF RECOMMENDATION While the staff understands the situation and the concerns of the adjacent property owners pertaining to the assessments resuiting from this project, the assessment revenue generated from this project had to be guaranteed against the sale of the bonds used to finance the construction of this project. If the appraisal report substantiates an increase in value to the property equal to or greater than the amount of the assessments, it is staff's recommenda- tion that the assessments be reaffirmed, adopted and certified to the County as presented at the final assessment hearing on September 18, 1984. COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION/COMMENTS 66 317 U?J P E,tia a S .?,+e?"s?x..EAi?+? ^nn ?\ ,:? `Pd V k .' ,..I y M 4 t July 19, 1984 City Council RE: Jay & Lesley Tscherne City of Eagan 4230 Blackhawk Road Eagan, mn. 55122 Eagan, Mn. 55122 Assessments NOTICE OF OFFICIAL OBJECTION re: pending assessments on 4230 Blackhawk Rd. ` Dear Sirs: Please be advised that on July 19, 1984, an official objection is being filed with your city regarding the pending assessments at 4230 Blackhawk Rd. This notice does preceed a letter of explanation and possible acceptable alternatives. Thank you for your attention, Lesley & Jay Tscherne 4230 Blackhawk Road ?7 ?-- - Ja.mes D. & Carol J. Ashworth 4235 Blackhawk Rd. Eagan, Mn. 4g2-2467 T0: C it,y of Eagan G/0 Muri1C 1pa1 Cle?'k 3795 Pilot Knob Ad. Eagan 9 Mn. July 25, 1984 t% q 4A Y?`f;`? ?0.?? h o, !C?B`? I Re: Notice of Objection t'o Propossed Assessments Dear Sir, This letter is to inform the City Council that L4e, James D. and raral J. Ashworth object to assessments pending at 4235 Blackhawk Rd. on the yet to be completed project No. 317 Uti?ity and Street Improve- ments. We object on the following arrounds: 1) The assessments are unfairlv disproportionate to housing market values and will not provide any real home equity. 2) Construction was overdesigned beyound tha normal neiohborhood construction practices. 3) Based on engineers estimates the essessment-s areate a unfai.r and serious finAncial burden to an existing property owner. 4) Because this project is apparently an intrical part of the State Highway program in this area, tne other benefitting parties should participate in the cost whe ther directly or indirectly. 'de feel confident that you :,rill take these matters into consideration c .nd provide us ?rith a more equitable solution to this forthcomming problem. We look fork*ard to hearing from and if you have any questions please ca.ll. Sincerly James D. & Carol J. Ashworti ?? September 17, 1984 J ? -t' ?J E. J. Van Overbeke City Clerk C i ty of E ag an 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55122 SUBJECT: ASSESSMENT APPEAL #3/7 I wish to appeal the assessment to my property at 4290 Blackhawk Rd, in Eagan. I also wish to be notified of any future meetings involving this project, Sincerely, Robert D. Kruger cc: Beatta Blomquist Mayor of Eagan 6 f 317 , August 17, 1964 Paul riauge, Atty. 3906 Sibley riemorial Highway I.'?.flEflPl, IviN 53122 De&r rir. Eau6e : This is a letter of formal objection to the assessmerits against my property (112-32 BlacKhawk kd) from the Blackhawr, Road Project. I fe;31 there is no benefit to me for sewer and utilities, because, I am to Yar from the connection and cannot afford Lhe expensive cost. This would put a financisl burden on me which I caZnoi: ai ford. Sincer y, Darold Nolden 4232 blacxhawx Rd. Eagan, N`u1 5.?122 7o 19°%1 ? x _i ; , r ?- ?? ??' ? \ I ` ,r ? ' ; '? . / ,'?`\ \? _ _-Q*?• ? ' i-- '? _ ??? _ • ` \\ ? / / 1 ` ?TL/ / ' . ' `` ?? / ; ' ? ? ? Tj9L???? Bm o 9 ? 7 T9163 02'_ i ? ._ -- ? . . -. - ._ -- - --• Q1-- ? \? --I /',, . 111 1.,,. , ? ? ? ? ?•? ? ? T ?sa ??, r8e S ,a \O J \ .?' ?,:-.?•e?' `? r 1 1.? 11 I ' ??'?' y / ? i ? i?? 1 bc- _ Ta4i3' ? ???? ?? ?. ? x"•. ? i I? ? ? ?? `? a3 i I ?. r \ ? I ? i1U - ? i ? ?•? ? ? (,? ? 1 P. :? ??i ? ?; ? ? j?j? X/, 3 i? . \ 1\ ,``n ' ? ? ? - ` ?' Y? ..? ??•"Rs j t' t? . ' ? •.1, `•,,?„? ?\?? ? ? ?? j, ,? ? ? , ?% ', ? ', . ` ` ±? ,,. ;? ? c •' T 9 3 7 ? ? ? , ' ? . ZL d ?A28L'.:qS ? ? ` a ? ? p ? X i ? ; 1 ?1 xT9r41 i '?j ,} , ?t ?i '?n„ ? ? ?.? ? ??j _ ?' (?'1 ? X ? I •, . ? .. ' • r ••4 G ... .' , . . .?=? ` ' ' . ?' ; \ . _ \ `?L." . 1 ' '_' _ - _ ? _ _' I "S. . '. ? . ;.... . .. . U ? ; I }? ....?.?, ' y „ ti..?'. ' ? , ? ? ??\ ?. ? ? ?' • 4? ? S?? 1 1 ,. 11 `\? ? 'l. ?7...,.,, PROJECT N0. 317 FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL BLACKNAWK ROAD I,ET,IU. DESCRIPfION PARCEl. tA. SOCfION 29 N.E. 1/ OZO-05 Ie1TEAAf. BEWTT TAUNC SAPIITAW WATERMf+IN FAONf SE1iEA LATER1L FAONP @$10.84 S.F. FUUfA(E @a31.82 F.F. EC)0'1'A(E and $17.87 M.F. TAUN( ARE4 WATEIU4AIN ARFA ACRES @$1070.00 PER ACRE SEAVICFS S10RM S&M SNFm S61Eft TAUN( LA'rERa[. @$0.0431 FAONf @$10.51 S.F. AAFA $4.0539(8) EtIOTA(E ND $13•14 M.F. 9QUAAE E'ODT a0.0647(5) 82500 5337.75(5) SfAFET FAONP @$33•69 S.F. 1UTAI. pSSFSSaBt.E FoOTAGE AND $53•50 M.F. CDsf 5337.15 014-09 FLwre 5mclitf 3rd Add. 323.65 (1) 5783.63 (e) 473•65(9) 6221.83 118996(6) 6413•88(8) 398.65 21327.78 (8) 39747-12 Formerly Parce1013-09 910-10 136 4327.00 136 1474.24 1325.21 136 1429.18 16500(4) 711.15(1) 136 4581.84 13848.62 9ncllff 2nd Additim ? 81 Ints aM Wtlat ^A" _ 67 lot Fquiv. 435.35 (3) 4719-19 604.99(9) 6357.62(8) 181432 7819•72 1622.64(9) 54666.74 . 73563•71 Formarly Part of Parcel ($31.89 Fer Lot) ($42.95 Ier [ot) ($52.841er [nt) (E369.37 Et:r ipt) ($197.05 Eer Lot) 014,29 and 015-28 9mcliff 1st lddition int 1 and Lot 2, 8locic 7 180.93 5756.51 180,93 1961.28 SELTIDN 29 S.W. 1/4 2650.42 180.93 1901.33 23713 1022.03 180.93 6095.53 19387•10 ot3?1 i 645 39507.50(9) 34507.50 '1C71'ALS 17 3•32 56102.16 2522.32 32555.75 12.27 1312 .90 1558 .38 , 841.96 32207.7 56287.21 4429.61 178188-85 7.01 Acre , µ7fFS 11) 150' WRNEi I.Of CREDTT WAS APPLIID. (2) 75' CORNER IJJT CRFDIT WAS API1.Im. ' (3) aSSFSSFD AT 50 PEfCINf OF FAOIJf E1X71'A(R. (4 (ARGE IAT CRIDTT NAS APPLIm MD WAS aSSFSSm AT 16,500 SQ. Fl'. FER ACRE. l51 hSSFSSm AT TtIE WMEflCIAL IEDI,ISTftIAL AA1E. (6) UNDEYE].OPm PAACE7. IN IJHI01 A 20 PEACINf DEDUCfION IN ARFA WAS APPLIID FOR EUfURE RI(HT CE WAY. (7) ADDTTIOWiL ASSES3hMf DUE WHEN AND ff AFIDNm OR MYFI.OPFD. (8) ASSessm ar D+e Ha.rIFarui.r RaTE. (9) E7fCLUDES W1'MiAI, cAS FASf1°?xf. 020-06 136 4327-00 136 1414.24 1577.48 136 1429.18 16500(4) 711.15(1) 136 4581.84 14100.89 011-07 282 8972.17 282 503934 (e) 9.29(6) 9940.30 282 3704.33(8) 404590(4) 21807.40(8) 282 15081.00 (e) 64550.54 010-08 272 8654.01 136 • 1474.24 2902.68 136 1429.18 16500(4) 711.15(7) 136 4581.84 32363•41 (B) 136 2430.32 (e) 136 1786.49(8) 17272 1117.50(5) 136 6.00 030-08 196.39 6248.39 196.39 2?287. F7 0.58 620.60(7) 2650.42 196.39 zo3.79 16500(4) 711.15 196.39 6616.38 21039.60 .s HAUGE, EIDE & KELLER, P. A. ATTORNEYS AT LAW WATER VIEW OFFICE TOWER. SUITE 303 1200 YANKEE DOODLE ROAD EAGAN. MINNESOTA 55123 PAUL H. HAUGE KEVIN W. EIDE DAVID G. KELLER LOR1 M. BELLIN DEBRA E. SGHMIDT Mr. Thomas Hedges City Admiaistrator 3830 Pilot Rnob Road Eagan, MN 55121 RE: Holden vs. Eagan Asseasment Appeal Dear Mr. Hedges: October 13, 1986 C' ?? yo,-, AREA COOE 6 12 TELEVHONE 456-9000 454-4224 ? ?? ??0---o r • ? 0°? 1 +? Pursuant to the decision in this appeals case published in the October 3, 1986 issue of Finance & Commerce, we were able to make contact with Judge Nierengarten's law clerk in regard to the actual meaning of the decision in that case. As indicated to you before, we have successfully appealed the Court's award of $5,559.10 reducing the City's original assessment of approximately $27,043.37. Judge Nierengarten's clerk has confirmed our interpretation of the decision to say that the City's levied asaessment is reinstated and the trial court overruled on the basis that the assessmenta do not exceed the benefit to the property. A copy of the decision has been served upon Holden's attorney to insure that any appeal time will begin to run. We would request that the City Clerk advise us if there is any difficulty with the County in having the assessment reinstated or the stay lifted, as the case may be. Sincerely, HAUGE, EIDE & KELLER, P.A. - David G. Keller DGR:ras cc: Eugene VanOverbeke 9 4 5- - 8- - _] B-_ -` 10-- - - %O p - - --- - _ - - - _ - ? , _ ? ;? I a y - I ? iD , ? _ _ y?.3? ? - ;? ? - - - - - - - - -- r -? I i ? - - ? i -- ' ? 111 / ? ? - - - - - - - - ? 9 u 114 ? n I ?5 5 I? i Ii i ? I I ' - I 7 , ?--? _. 7, ??&y?-r-l? s - ? W I I I I 8 i 19 ' ?110 h p' 0 ? 23 124 3 ? 25 S ':8 19 g Y i i I T , :j35 ? i ? ? ._ 1136 l ? .._ . _.. . ._ I,_ . . _ _ .. - ._ . . .. '? __ _. f . I ? ? L • . ?- .. ' _ - .. . . _ - . _ . . __ _ _ • . 177 ? _ . . _ _ . __ ._ - - . _._. .. .... I _ _ _ . . - _ .... . _ ' ... ae ' -- l I78 ? - , _. .__ e r .,o. 1 1 U.. J a A, , .. ,. . .. . --?•----•---.-r_?-,-r-,--•? , ?T?-,- i --?--r? i ., _- ? ,? -r......r--r--rT-?--? _ city oF eagan 3830 PILOT KNOB ROAD, P.O. BOX 21199 EAGAN, MINNESOTA 55121 PHONE: (612) 454-8100 September 22, 1986 MR DAROLD HOLDEN 4232 BLACKHAWK RD EAGAN MN 55122 Dear Mr. Holden: BEA BLOMQUIST Mayor THOMAS EGAN JAMES A. SMITH VIC ELLISON 1HEODORE WACHTER Council Members THOMAS HEDGES City AdminisTraTor EUGENE UAN OVERBEKE City Clerk Re: Walnut Trails Fence Line Dispute Apparently, there is still a lack of communication between the two of you regarding the proposed fence between your respective property. In an effort to solve this disagreement and others which too often require the City to act as an intermediary, a meeting will be set up to clarify.these issues. The City Planning Department will contact you soon to set up this meeting date. If an agreement cannot be reached at that point, these items will be brought before the City Council for a final resolution. Sincerely, 'r tv?-- IrmJim St Planner I cc: Paul Hauge Parcel File 10 02900 060 05 Walnut Trails File JS/cks THE LONE OAK TREE. ..THE SYMBOL OF STRENGTH AND GROWTH IN OUR COMMUNITY Dear Sir: You were in City fial1 requesting that the City remove certain special assessments from your properties, because you were successful in appea?ing the amount of your assessments. The City has appealed thar decision and, baCed on the opinion of City's lega'l counsel, the City's special assessment staff wil'i not process any chariges to the assessrnents on your properties. Any changes wi11 be processed after resolution of the case by the Appellate. Court. Ir you have additional questions, please contact me at the City. Sincerely, Geralcl Wobschall Special Assessments GW/dk TFlE LONE OAK TREE.. T!-!F SYMBUL OF STP[naGTH AND 6RC?WFH 1N (?'!Q CQMMUNiIY SAC 10/9/84 F. PROJECT 317, BLACKHAWK ROAD STREETS & UTILITIES i. Jay Tscherne (10-02900-040-05 2. James Ashworth (10-02900-010-10 3. Robert Keuger (10-02900-010-08) 4. Darold Holden (10-02900-030-05) (10-02900-060-05) (10-02900-070-05) BACKGROUND INFORMATION While each of the above property owners have submitted individuals appeals/ objections, they are all neighbors affected by the same street and utility project. Therefore, it would be beneficial to discuss all four property owners' situations collectively to avoid any repetition. Project 317 provided for the installation of sanitary sewer, water, storm sewer and street improvements on Blackhawk Road from Diffley Road to the northside of I-35E/Blackhawk Road overpass. In order for the State to construct the 48-foot-wide bridge over I-35E, the City had to commit to a concurrent construction of Blackhawk Road from I-35E to Cliff Road and also to Diffley Road. Due to the fact that Blackhawk Road is classified as a municipal State-aid street, certain design standards had to be complied with. Prior to permanently improving a street to its ultimate design section, all underground utilities have to be installed. Subsequently, Project 317 was initiated and constructed during 1983. These four property owners along Blackhawk Road are existing residents who did not petition for improvements and expressed their objections at the time of the public hearing and have followed through with written objections at the final assessment hearing which was held on September 1$, 1984. Enclosed on pages67_through% 1)_ are copies of the written ob'ections submitted by these four property owners. Enclosed on page is a topographic map referencing these four property owners and the parcels under their ownership. Enclosed on page14, is a breakdown of the assessments associated with each property showing the frontage and areas used to determine the final assessments based on the individual rates. The City Attorney and Public Works Director have had several meetings with these property owners from the inception of the project at the original public hearing to most recently on September 24 to review the concerns with the property owners listed as foilows: 1. The project was not at the request of the property owners but rather initiated by the City over their objectians. 2. The amount of the assessment exceeds the benefit to each of the parcels affected. 3. The amount of the assessments is excessive as to what each property owner can afford on a monthlyjyearly basis. During the meetings with property owners, the staff has reviewed how the costs of the assessments were determined, the method used to calculate the /1,< F. PROJECT 317, BLACKHAWK ROAD STREETS & UTILITIES (continued) unit rates and the amount of City participation for the various improvements. The property owners are requesting further review by the Special Assessment Committee to see if any special consideration to their unique situation through the deferment, postponement or reduction of the assessments relating to this improvement. The staff has hired Mr. Dan Dwyer as an appraiser to evaluate the increase in valuation to the property as a result of this project in relationship to the amount of the assesments. At the time of this packet preparation, this appraisal report has not been completed. Therefore, it is anticipated that this information will be made available to the Special Assessment CommiCtee at their meeting on October'9, 1984. STAFF RECOMMENDATION While the staff understands the situation and the concerns of the adjacent property owners pertaining to the assessments resulting from this project, the assessment revenue generated from this project had to be guaranteed against the sale of the bonds used to finance the construction of this project. If the appraisal report substantiates an increase in value to the property equal to or greater than the amount of the assessments, it is staff's recommenda- tion that the assessments be reaffirmed, adopted and certified to the County as presented at the final assessment hearing on September 18, 1984. COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION/COMMENTS 6? July 19, 1984 City Council City of Eagan Eagan, mn. 55122 317 v?,Jgc.1`raNS RE: Jay & Lesley Tscherne 4230 Blackhawk Road Eagan, Mn. 55122 Assessments NOTICE OF OFFICIAL OBJECTION re: pending assessments on 4230 Blackhawk Rd. ` Dear Sirs: Please be advised that on July 19, 1984, an official objection is being filed with your city regarding the pending assessments at 4230 Blackhawk Rd. This notice does preceed a letter of explanation and possible acceptable alternatives. Thank you for your attention, ?' .?? Lesley & Jay Tscherne 4230 Blackhawk Road 67 James D. & Carol J. Ashworth 4235 Blackhawk Rd. Eagan, Mn. 452-2467 T0: C it,y of Eagan C/0 Municipal Clerk 3795 Pilot Knob Rd. Easran, Mn. 3uly 25, 1984 ???`? ow" Ae: Notice of C}bjection to Propossed Assessments Dear Si?^, This letter is to inf orm the City Council t5hat we, James D. and Caral J. nshworth object to assessments pending at 4235 Blackhawk 8d. on the yet to be completed project No. 327 UtiZity and Str°et Improve- ments. GJe object on the followin; arounds: - 1) The assessments are unfairlv disproportionate to housing market values and wlll not provide any real home equity. 2) Construction was overdesigned beyound the normal neighborhood construetion practices. 3) Based on engineers estimates the essessments create a unfair and serious f inancial burden to an existing property owner. 4) Because this project is apparently an intrical part of the State Highway program in this area, the other benef itting parties should participate in the cost whe ther directly or indirectly. ' We feel confident that you will take these matters into consideration and provide us with a more eauitable solution to this forthcomming problem. We look forward to hearing from and if you have any questions please call. Sincerly James D. & Carol J. Ashwortl 6 1/ September 17, 1984 a1- ??1 ?J E. J. Van Overbeke City Clerk City of Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55122 SUBJECT: ASSESSMENT APPEAL # 3Y? I wish to appeal the assessment to my property at 4290 Blackhawk Rd, in Eagan. I also wish to be notified of any future meetings involving this project. Sincerely, Robert D. Kru9er cc: Beatta Blomquist Mayor of Eagan 6f 317 , August 17, 1984 Paul riauge, Atty. 3906 Sibley riemorial Highway EaEan, MN 55122 De &r Mr. tiauge : ??. a-?/- E (7"1 got This is a letter of formal objection to the assessmerits against my property (42-32 Blackhawk hci ) from the B1acKhawr. Road Yroject. I f'e-1 there is no benefit to me for sewer ar:d utilities, because, I am to f'ar from the connection and cannot afford Lhe expensive cost. This would put a financiel burr3en on me which I cannai; afford. Sincer y, Darold Holden 4232 blackhawk Rd. Eagan, Mi1 5?122 7o ? T90 `- ? r , ?? ` ` ? ? ?' 1? I `e? / " `??. _ ? ?? ? ? ? ? -• ? ? .. ? 1yy%? ?--i ? X T T Z.' T9163 9 77 ? ? ?\_ ' ? ' ._ ' ' ? " "• ^^'?- I ? ' /l, \ _ - ?'yw. • ? - ? f ` ' ?-. ? 1 906 XT qi? _? /; ??__?-' ' ?? ?•? / ? / ?' :? ??? , ? ?? I___J ?? ?? ';- I '?; ?_/' o - ' ? ` ` ' ? ? '? i ? ? ? --?-' ? ??• i x ? 1 `//' 1 ;• \\ ` `\ ` ' / / ? r ___ , '' '? . ? T9123 ? p ?r ?. ? :1 1 ? . `??` 1 ? ?? ? • I ? _ _ _ ? - ? 1 _ 1 _ "- I .?`? ? '• 'r?" ?? , `? ??. ? - .? ?? ?` ? O • i?? ? -?/ . 77'49j 1 , ? ? i? ? ? ? ` ?? l i "f X .? ,i --- - - Q;-? _,: ,.?, r - I ? 1 • I T q53 ?O?L T 9y1=N T 1'157 _ 1 ? b ? ? d .. 0??3 ?;??? , 1 r ?. ? ? ? •? L I A I ? ? -?L_ x l ?f? -?- ? I ? -9'Vp_ 95 ?? • ? ?,,- ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? -, ; '. ? .. ? i -? --? ? i i i ? T89 13 ? i i r Z ? ? / • ? t ? ? "? i ? i i I ?? i i ? ; ? ,? r .. v, , i ? ?;? i ?? ? ? • ? ?_, ? s l ?!•' ? • ": ? ' ' ? ?. _?W ?(7 . ? ?' ?' \ \ . I ? - ??? I? ri -r , IJt F.. ??},?`; ? „I? .???,'' A ? ? 1, ??l ? ,? -' ?i 6?" ? ;1 C ,?: M11 .1 ? . ? \ / \ '' ? / ' r; ?'.i'c'i1 ? i•. ?`? ?ti V ?? , (? ' ?? ? ? ? ? d t929L ,, q3 ` ? ? ?i ? ? T'p ? X ? r ? ? 1 `? ? xT9T??i '•t 1 ? 'wi?3 ? ? 1 ? - ? ? ? t3 ` ' ? . ? ? :?? ?. .?? . ? ' .Y ' t - ?` . . - - 1 ?` • ? ? , . . . ? . . ' . . . , ,., .. . i 7 ? ...,.. I PROJECT NO. 317 FINAL ASSESSMENT ROL BLACKHAWK ROAD CATF?iAL BENEFTT TRUPIC TAUNC ARFA SWTARSf WATERKAIN WATER1AIN l.FGA[. DE9CRIPfION FAONf SEYlER LATE7tAI. FflONf @$10.84 S.F. AREA ACRES @$1070.00 PER ACRE SERVICFS PAHCQ. N]. FOOfA(E: @E31.82 E.E. EUOTA(£ and $17.87 M.F. SE7C!'ION 29 N.E. 1/ 020-05 030-05 210 6681.41 210 2276.40 1577.48 _040-05 240 7635.89 240 2601.60 2.4 6 2568.00 7 1577.48 060-05 O7U-05 010-06 110 3499.78 110 1192.40 1325.21 020-06 136 4327.00 136 1474.24 1577.48 011-07 282 8972.17 282 5034.34 (8) 9.29 (6) 9940.30 010-09 Z12 8654.01 136 • 1474.24 2902.68 136 2430.32 (8) 030-08 196.39 6248.39 196.39 2128.r7 0.58 620.60(7) 2650.42 Ot4-09 FLture 9mcliff 3rd Add. 323.65 (i) 5783.63 (8) Formerly EAroel 013-09 910-10 136 4327.00 136 1474.24 1325.21 9imlifP 2nd Addttton 81 tocs and atlot ^a° ? = 67 Int Fquiv. 435.35 (3) 4719.19 Formerly Part of Paroel (a31.$9 Per Lot) 014-29 and 015-28 9=11ff tst Addition Got t and !At 2. Block 7 180.93 5756.51 180.93 1961.28 SFXTION 29 S.W. 1/4 013-51 2650.42 TOTAIS 17 3•32 56102.16 2522.32 32555.75 12.27 1312 •90 1558 .38 Acre NUfM 11) 150' ODRNNE3ii I.OT CREDIT WAS APPLIFD. (2) 75' ODRNER WT CAIDIT WAS APPLIID. (3) ASSESS'D AT 50 PERCEM' OF FRONf F'OOTA(F. (4 IARGE LOT CftmTT WAS APPLIID MD WAS ASSESSm AT 16,500 SQ. FT. PER ACRE. (5) ASS6SFD AT TtE OOM'ERCIAL INl)STRIAL RAT'E. (6) UWIIAPm PARCII. IN WHI(31 A 20 PEHCINf DEDULTION IN AREA WAS APPLIID FOR FUlURE RIQiT CF WAY. (7) ADDTTIONAL ASSM3"Nr DUE WFEN AAm IF RFLONFD OR DhlrQ.OPED. (8) ASSESSFD AT THE MILTIFAhII1.Y RATE. (9) IX(Id1DfS Na1UAAl, cI1S FASEME]Jf. BEA BLOMpUIST MAVOR .? THQMAS EGAN JAMES A SMITH ? c? ITY `?C 4 AGAN ? . JERRV THOMAS THEODORE WACHTER j ? ` ?.??' r 79SPILQ?,kN08 RIYAD ' COUNCIL MEMBEHS n ?E AGAy? I?NNESOTA ` ' ; W22? T ?.. ?? •?.? . 1,,?.,,v+.." P ONE 4S4'8100 1 ? . June 24, 1982 Mr. Darold Holden 4232 Blackhawk Road, Eagan, MN 55122 Re: Aqricultural Building on Parcel #10 02900 430 05 Dear Darold: THOMAS HEDC,ES CITY ADMINISTRATOH EUGENE 4AN OVERBEKE CITY CLEHK When a bui2di.ng houses animals, it must be set 2aack 50' from the property line. Please make sure af this. Even though you own a31 af the parcels (lfl 02900 030 05, Ia 02900 060 OS and IO 42900 OVO 05) you must respect each property line. The 50' setback is a requirement of Ordinance 52.06, Subdivision 5 A. Sincerely, Dale Feterson Suilding Official DSP/bar THE LONE OAK TREE ... THE SYMBOL OF STRENGTH AND GROWTH IiV OUR COMMUNITY. ic ? 7 7 C) BEA BLOMpU157 MAYOR THOMASEGAN MARK PARRANTO JAMES A. SMITH THEODORE WACHTER COUNCtL MEMBERS MAY 11, 1981 DAROLD HOLDEN CEDARVALE AUTO 4232 BLACKHAWK RD EAGAN MN 55122 0 !!S THOMASHEOGES CITV AOMINISTRATOR EUGEPIE vAN OYERBEKE CITV CLEHK 'r Re: Zoning Classification for Amaco Station Located at the Intersection of Wildwood Lane and Nicols Road Dear Mr. Holden: At your request, I have researched the zoning classification of the Amaco Station at the -intersection of Wildwood Lane (County Road 30) and Nicols Road (Ol? --dar Avenue) and the underlying zoning is neighborhood business which provides a general category for service stations. Therefore, the property is zoned properly for a service station which is the intended future use as you have described. Sincerely, ?? ? ""-? ? Thom as L. Hedges City Administrator TLH/hnd THE LONE OAK TREE ... THE SYMBOL OF STRENGTH AND GROWTH IN OUR COMMUNITY. BEA BLOMQUIST MAYOR THOMASEGAN MARK PARRANTO JAMES A. SMITH THEODORE WACHTER COUNGL MEMBERS MAY 11, 1981 d 0 ?d0 a 3 ?7 a CiTY OF EA.GAN r 3798 Pl1,OT ILNOB , ROAII EAGAN. ?-MINPfESOTA 36122 ? ? PHQNE 454-0100 z . .:Y. ?>f. . . Kt DAROLD HOLDEN 4232 BLACKHAWK RD EAGAN MN 55122 .0- THOMASHEDGES CITY AOMINISiRATOR EUGENE VAN OVERBEKE CITV CLERK Re: Proposed Land Use for Property Located at 4232 Blackhawk Road Dear Mr. Holden: Your property, described as 4232 Blackhawk Road, is shown on the long range City land use guide plan as mixed residential (6 to 12 units per acre ). Presently, the property is zoned agricultural. Please make reference to the enclosed land use guide plan that has been submitted by the City of Eagan to the Metropolitan Council for review. If you have any questions regarding the proposed land use, feel free to contact Mr. Dale Runkle, City Planner, or myself at any time. Sincerely, ?1L.L't?A`` ?- Thomas L. Hedges ? City Administrator TLH/hnd Encl. THE LONE OAK TREE ... THE SYMBOL OF STRENGTH AND GROWTH IN OUR COMMUNITY SAC 10/9/84 F. PROJECT 317, BLACKHAWK ROAD STREETS & UTILITIES 1. Jay Tscherne (10-02900-040-05 2. James Ashworth (10-02900-010-10) 3. Robert Keuger (10-02900-010-08) 4. Darold Holden (10-02900-030-05) (10-02900-060-05) (10-02900-070-05) BACKGROUND INFORMATION While each of the above property owners have submitted individuals appeals/ objections, they are all neighbors affected by the same street and utility project. Therefore, it would be beneficial to discuss all four property owners' situations collectively to avoid any repetition. Project 317 provided for the installation of sanitary sewer, water, storm sewer and street improvements on Blackhawk Road from Diffley Road to the northside of I-35E/Blackhawk Road overpass. In order for the State to construct the 48-foot-wide bridge over I-35E, the City had to commit to a concurrent construction of Blackhawk Road from I-35E to Cliff Road and also to Diffley Road. Due to the fact that Blackhawk Road is classified as a municipal State-aid street, certain design standards had to be complied with. Prior to permanently improving a street to its ultimate design section, all underground utilities have to be installed. Subsequently, Project 317 was initiated and constructed during 1983. These four property owners along Blackhawk Road are existing residents who did not petition for improvements and expressed their objections at the time of the public hearing and have followed through with written objections at the final assessment hearing which was held on September 18, 1984. Enclosed on pages67 through7[) are copies of the written ob'ections submitted by these four property owners. Enclosed on page is a topographic map referencing these four property owners and the parcels under their ownership. Enclosed on page'14- is a breakdown of the assessments associated with each property showing the frontage and areas used to determine the final assessments based on the individual rates. The City Attorney and Public Works Director have had several meetings with these property owners from the inception of the project at the original public hearing to most recently on September 24 to review the concerns with the property owners listed as follows: 1. The project was not at the request of the property owners but rather initiated by the City over their objections. 2. The amount of the assessment exceeds the benefit to each of the parcels affected. 3. The amount of the assessments is excessive as to what each property owner can afford on a monthly/yearly basis. During the meetings with property owners, the staff has reviewed how the costs of the assessments were determined, the method used to calculate the l.< F. PROJECT 317, BLACKHAWK ROAD STREETS & UTILITIES (continued) unit rates and the amount of City participation for the various improvements. The property owners are requesting further review by the Special Assessment Committee to see if any special consideration to their unique situation through the deferment, postponement or reduction of the assessments relating to this improvement. The staff has hired Mr. Dan Dwyer as an appraiser to evaluate the increase in valuation to the property as a result of this project in relationship to the amount of the assesments. At the time of this packet preparation, this appraisal report has not been completed. Therefore, iC is anticipated that this information will be made available to the Special Assessment Committee at their meeting on October'9, 1984. STAFF RECOMMENDATION While the staff understands the situation and the concerns of the adjacent property owners pertaining to the assessments resulting from this project, the assessment revenue generated from this project had to be guaranteed against the sale of the bonds used to finance the construction of this project. If the appraisal report substantiates an increase in value to the property equal to or greater than the amount of the assessments, it is staff's recommenda- tion that the assessments be reaffirmed, adopted and certified to the County as presented at the final assessment hearing on September 18, 1984. COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION/COMMENTS 66 July 19, 1984 City Council City of Eagan Eagan, mn. 55122 317 v tj Pc"410.vs RE: Jay & Lesley Tscherne 4230 Blackhawk Road Eagan, Mn. 55122 Assessments NOTICE OF OFFICIAL OBJECTION re: pending assessments on 4230 Blackhawk Rd. ` Dear Sirs: Please be advised that on July 19, 1984, an official objection is being filed with your city regarding the pending assessments at 4230 Blackhawk Rd. This notice does preceed a letter of explanation and possible acceptable alternatives. Thank you for your attention, ? 07 VL' Lesley & Jay Tscherne 4230 Blackhawk Road 61 Ja.mes D. & Carol J. Ashworth 4235 Blackhawk Rd. Eagan, Mn. 452-2467 T0: Cit,y of Eaizan C/0 Mun3cipal Clerk 3795 Pilot Kn.ab Rd. Ea sran 9 Mn. Jul.y 25, 1984 'J R I e: Natice of Objection t'o Propossed Assessments Dear Sir, This letter is to inform the City Council that we, James D. anri Carol J. Ashworth objeet to assessments pending at 4235 Blackhawk 8d. on the yet to be completed project No. 317 Utility and Str°et Improve- ments. We object on the followin; grounds: - 1) The assessments are unfairly dispropoxtzonate to housing market vaZues and will not provide any real home equity. 2) Construction was overdesigned beyound the normal neibhborhood construction praetices. 3) Hased an engineers estimates the essessments create a unfair and serious financial burden to an existing property oT,,mer. 4) Because this pro ject is apparently an intrical part of the State Highway program in this area, the other benefitting parties should participate in the cost whe ther directly or indirectly. We feel confident that you will take these matters into consideratian 3nd provide us nrith a more equitable solution to this forthcomming problem. We look forward to hearing from and if you have any questions please call. Sincerly James D. & Carol J. Ashwort? I 'K September 17, 1984 C-k ?J E. J. Van Overbeke City Clerk City of Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55122 SUBJECT: ASSESSMENT APPEAL 4 317 I wish to appeal the assessment to my property at 4290 Blackhawk Rd, in Eagan. I also wish to be notified of any future meetings involving this project. Sincereljr, ? ` ?l1? Robert D. Kruger cc: Beatta Slomquist Mayor of Eagan df 317 , August 17, 1964 Pa,al riauge, Atty. ?3906 Sibley Memorial Highway Eat?an, Klv 53122 Dear Mr. Hauge : This is a letter of formal objection to the assessmerlts against my property (42-32 Blackhawk Bd) fror: the Blackhawk Road Yroject. I i'e3l there is no benefit to me for sewer ar.d utilities, because, I am to f'er from the connection and cannot afford LhE expensive cost. This would put a financial burden on me which I cannoL afforci. Sincer y, Darold Holden 4232 blackhawk Rd. Eagan, Mi1 5.?122 70 / T9oa? ._ 9oQ`! / i i ? \ i i ,// , •\ / j -- ? 79'?63 `?- ` ? L. _ 1 - .. __ p2'_ X XT9ov1 T4GL?X N O 897i l / ? ?( V ` • • ,, , ? ? , ??T.\ , , T iT? ? . :J ,? \ ?\ o x ,.• i „ F- r ? ? ? 1 `? i ? 1? ?\ 1` ? ? ?` • ? i- ' ??. ? `'; T91S3 ? ? ? ...:.i . ' _ , a ` _ ;-.?•:' , , .?. . ,? ? , ? , --- ,_ `_? I ?1 1 T9125 J r.r ??. ? \ . I ? - - - \ _1_ / ??1- ? • •rf? ?1` ?\ ',` ';: .\ ?,\ ?` `\ / ? ,O ?. ? ?? -T7W93 1 , ? ? , µ ? ?' li ? ?.. ?` ?, ,i ?\ ? ? - > q ? `1 1` O • . ?? T f95? ??? i I I 440 1 ? I 1 ? ? ? '? ? ? ? ? ? i ? ? 1. ? 5 ?• ? Y,. ' I 1 i ` _ ; ` \ , ? " .` ? ? ? '?_, " - /. ?? ? {:,? 11 ?.? a. ;.y '• ? ??. I Q ' ? ? ? ? i ' 1 + ?'.: ? ? ? ?1f i' ?. . ? , ? i .?? , ? • ? `? ? l/ 9?p.? ? ? \ ? ?' y? . . ? . ? , ??,? ?. •. t?.; ? f' ? . 1 ? \ ,? ? q 1 Tr i l. i. .? .i ?' • ? ? ??4\ ` ?? f?? f~ ?. 1?'?? ?? ? . ?'`_.? ,' ??? . I ? ? ; ? q! ?,?< `1 ? ?.. ?' ? `??. ?; ? C •? T937? ? / 1 ``i ? ? t?28?`,, y3, ? ? ??`?i? ?' ? ?p ? X i ? 1 1 `? ?xT9W.f +? ? Z, ..? l ?? ' ? ?? ? ? ? ? ? r 911 ` , _ - x ` - ?-'_ ? , - -- ? ,` •i? ^ . . ? .eo. ,?.. ,, . ???:???'..?.....W. ?`.. . . ?..,n\_ - `* . ?. . ?'?`? _ Tv3e? ? ,S ? `_ ? ,. ' PROJECT NO. 317 FINAL ASSES SMENT ROLL BLACKHAWK ROAD LATERAL BENEFTT TRUNt TflUW AREA SANQTARY WATEIiMIN WATF7H1AIN l.fT,A[. CFSCRIPfION FAONf SE11ER LATFRA[. FFCk(f @$10.84 S.F. AREA ACRFS @$1070.00 PER ACRE SERVICES PARCII. NJ. FCX7fAGE @a31.82 F.F. FtiOTA(£ and $17.87 M.F. SECI'ION 29 N.E. t/ OZO-05 030--05 210 6681.41 210 2Z16.40 1577.48 040-05 240 7635.89 240 2601.60 2.4 6 25G8.00 7 1 .48 060-05 ' 0'TO-OS 0t0-06 110 3499.78 110 1192•40 1325.21 020-06 t36 4327.00 136 1474.24 1577.48 01t-07 282 8972.17 282 5039.34 (8) 9.29 (6) 9940.30 010-08 272 8654.01 136 • 1474.24 2902.68 136 2430.32 (8) 030-08 196.39 6248.39 196.39 212877 0.58 620.60(7) 2650.42 Ot4-09 FLture Suncliff 3rd Add. 323.65 (1) 5783.63 (8) Formerly Paroel 013-09 Q10-t0 t36 4327.00 136 1474.24 1325.21 1-kimliff 2nd Addition 81 tnts and atiot ^n^ ? = 67 Lot Fquiv. 435.35 (3) 4719.19 FormPrly Part of Paroel (a31•89 Eer Lot) 014-29 and 015-28 9uroliff 1st Addition , wt 1 and Lot 2, Blodc 7 180.93 5756.51 180.93 196t.28 2650.42 SOCfION 29 S.W. 1A ot3-5t 1C71'ALS 17 3•32 56102.16 2522.32 32555.75 12.27 13128.90 1558.3 Acre NOrI'ES 11) 150' ODRNF]t LOf CRIDIT WAS APPLIED. (2) 75' aDRNU (OT CRIDI'f WAS APPLIED. (3) ASSESSED AT 50 PEACINf OF FRONf FUOTAGF. (4 IJ?RCE LAT CRIDTT WAS APPL.Im MD MIAS ASSESSm AT 16,500 SQ. ET. PER ACAE. (5) ASSFSSFD AT TNE CUhMflCIAL INUSTRIAL W1TE. (6) UWQAPm PARCFI. IN W11ICN A ZO PERCINf DEDIICI'ION IN ARFA WAS APPLIm FOA FUtl1RE RIGiT CF WAY. (7) ADDTTIONAI. ASSES.4'fNf DUE WEE7J AND IF 8F1ANID OR DEYFIAPID. (8) ASSESShD AT THE MILTIFAFIILY RATE. (9) IXO.UDes NANwu. GAS wom. /U- o ;Z960-D 30-05- CITY OF EAGAN ASSESSMENT AGREEMENT HOLDEN PROPERTY THIS AGREEMENT dated this day of February, 1985, between CITY OF EAGAN ("City") and DAROLD L. HOLDEN and MAUIS I. HOLDEN, husband and wife ("Owner) of 4232 Blackhawk Road, Eagan, Minnesota; WHEREAS, the City proposes to assess the following described premises in Dakota County, Minnesota, owned solely by Owner: Part of the NW 1/4 of the NE 1/4 commencing at the NW corner, thence E 244.7' to center line of Blackhawk Road, thence S 5 degrees E on center line 209' to point of beginning; thence E 2421, thence S 5 degrees E 57.3', thence E 807.37' to 1/4 1/4, thence S 1961, thence W 4631, thence right 2 degrees 30" 185.41, thence right 10 degrees 214', thence left lU degrees 30" to center line of Blackhawk Road, thence NE on center line to beginning, sub;;ect to 100' road easement, and except Minnesota Department of Transportation Right-of-Way Plat No. 19-39, all in Section 29, Township 27, Range 23, Dakota County, Minnesota. for the following improvements pursuant to City Projeet 317: sanitary sewer, water, storm sewer and streets; and, WHEREAS, on February 5, 1985, the Eagan City Council approved the levy of $25,319.37 in assessments for said improvements against said property, sub;;ect to the right of Owner and City to agree within 30 days of said date to the levy of $11,000.00 of said assessments and the postponement of the remainder until the occurrence of certain conditions; and, WHEREAS, Owner and City desire to enter into NOW THEREFORE, upon consideration of the parties hereto agree as follows; 1. The City shall immediately assess the al sum of a11,000.00 for the above described schedule attached hereto as Exhibit A and made a such an agreement; mutual covenants herein, the )ove described property in the improvements pursuant to the part hereof. 1 . ? 2. Upon the happening of any of the following conditions the remaining assessments shall be levied or a connection charge in lieu thereof made in the manfter specified in paragraph 3: A. Sale of any portion of the property, except that if after such sale the property continues to be used as it is currently used, the remaining assessments shall not be levied at such time of sale. Upan any sale the City shall review the intended use, and if the intended use does not change tne current use, the remaining assessments shall not be levied at that time. B. The property is split or platted, C. The property is rezoned. D. The property is developed. E. A building permit is issued for a residence on the property. 3. Upon the happening of any of the conditions specified in paragraph 2, the remaining assessments as described in Exhibit A shall be levied at the standard City assessment rates in effect at that time. 4. Qwner hereby waives the right to appeal the assessments of $11,000.00 to be levied, and if Owner does appeal such assessments, this agreement shall be null and void and the assessment of $25,319.37 shall be immediately certified to Dakota County. 5. The Owner agrees for himself, his heirs, executors, administrators, successors, and assigns, that if the actual use of said property is changed in the future to a use or zoning category which is assessable at a higher rate than the rate for the present use, the City may reassess or levy a supplemental assessment at such time equal to the difference between the assessment for the new land use and the assessment for the present land use at the assessment rates, according to.City policy, in effect at such future time. 2 . ?. ;., . 6. This agreement shall run with the land and binds the heirs, executors, successors, administrators and assigns of Owner. 7. The Owner, for himself, his heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns hereby waives notice of any and all hearings necessary and waives ob;;ection to any technical defects in any proceedings related to any such future assessments or connection charges and further waives the right to ob;;ect to or appeal from any such future assessments or connection charges made pursuant to this agreenent. 8. The undersigned hereby agree that this agreement may be recorded with the Dakota County Recorder and that the Owner shall execute any and all documents necessary to iMplement the recording of this agreement, including the delivery of the Owner's Duplicate Certificate of Title to the affected lands if necessary. 9. The undersigned includes all of the persons, firms or corporation that hold an interest in the land described above, including the fee title owners, contract for deed vendees or vendors or holders of any other interest under contraet for deed, option or otherwise. The undersigned have read and understand the above agreement and hereby bind themselves to it in all respects. OWNER Darold L. Holden Mavis I. Holden CITY OF EAGAN By: Its Mayor Attest: Zts Clerk This Document Drafted By• APPROVED: Public Works Airector Hauge, Smith & Eide, P.A. 3908 Sibley Memorial Highway Eagan, MP{ 55122 Thomas A. Colbert (612) 454-4224 EXEMPT FROM STATE DEED TAX 3 ? t1 STATE OF MINNESOTA) ) ss. COUNTY OF DAKOTA ) On this day of , 1985, before me a Notary Public within and for said County, personally appeared BEATTA BLOMQUIST and EUGENE VANOVERBEKE to me personally known, wha being each by me duly sworn, each did say that they are respectively the Mayor and Clerk of the City of Eagan, the municipality named in the foregoing instrument, ard that the seal affixed to said instrument was signed and sealed on behalf of said municipality by autnority of its City Council and said Mayor and Clerk acknowledged said instrument to be tne free act and deed of said municipality. Notiary Pablic STATE OF MINNESOTA) ) ss. COUNTY OF DAKOTA ) On this day of February, 1985, before me a Notary Public within and for said County, personally appeared DAROLD L. HOLDEN and MAVIS I. HOLDEN, husband and wife, to me known to be the persons described in and who executed the foregoing instrument and acknowledged that they executed the same as their free act and deed. Notary Public 4 EXHIBIT "A" Assessments to be levied immediately: Sanitary Sewer Lateral Lateral Benefit from Water Trunk Storm Sewer Lateral $ .6,681.4i $ 2,275.40 $ 2,042.19 $ 11,000.00 Remaining assessments to be levied in the future at standard City rates in exisLence at future tine of levy: Services Storm Sewer Lateral (7.46% of standard rate) Storm sewer trunk Street cAPt, ONIscHuk. AVIn: 1,_,,;. gpl - ? #,A- 0 T. 5 t• 0 \ef , e 4 y T D' COURT HOUSE HASTINGS, MINNESOTA 55033 t? ?.?-.. i ! Alyce Bolke, Clerk ??? n Tawnship :"9` Pilot Knob Road St. P,-,ul,Minn. 55111 Dear T,,!,-s . Bolke, October 16, 1970 non checking through the Eagan Township parcels, prior to posting <:sses:_:ents to tax statements, we have come across the following and wc5ul.d ike divisions on these or a statement from you as to where the a:>ses? 2nt should be posted. l. 3258-C8 is a new parcel divided from #3258-C1. We have a Sai. Sewer 1967 and a Sewer Lateral 1969. . 'At,6 2ZD/o - 0- -7 2. =-r3400-D is a new parcel divided from #3400-A. We had a card for Sa.n. "Pwer Trunk 1970 in the amount of $578.62. Is this the exact -.al car(,' naw -`-)r 4,1-3400-D? It seems to be in the right name for #3400-D. G0 3. b;312 has notw been divided into b3812-A and b3812-B. we have a Saz;-c"c-,ver Trunk 1967, a colewer & Water Lateral 1968 and a Street Su fa, ? nq 1970. &A'c A-, you are aware of any other divisions that we will need, we would -:ppreciate getting these as soon as possible. V?y truly y urs, ?// L CARL D. ONISCHtJK,-'-/ Dakota County AudS?tor -i , ? -:L- J BEA BLOMQUIST MAVOR THOMASEGAN JAMES A. SMITH JERRY TH4MAS 7HEODORE WACHTER GOUNGL MEMBERS June 24, 1982 Mr. Darold Holden 4232 Blackhawk Rpad, Eagan, MN 55122 ? C1TY ?OF =E?GAN t? ' 3795 PILOT KNOB?ROAD Oc'BOX 21199 , EaGa(tEMiNNiESOTa a.'. PR?OME 4S4 $IDO ? ? ' ?`??- ?'? ?. ,"• o, . .. ?.? ?? Re: Aqricultwral Building on Parcel #10 02900 030 OS Dear Darold: THOMASHEDGES CITY AdMINISiRAiOR EUGENE VAN bVERBEKE C17V CLERK When a building houses animals, it nenst be set back 50' fram the pxogerty 1ine. Please make sure of this. Even though you awn all of the parcels (10 02900 030 45, 10 0290Q 060 45 and 10 02900 0170 05) you must respect each progerty line. The 50' setback is a requirement af Ordinance 52.06, Subdivision S A. Sincerely, Dale Peterson 8uilding Official DSP/bar THE LOF1E QAK TREE ... THE SYMBOL OF STRENGTH AND GROWTH IN OUR COMMUNiTY. 0 52 / 'f/ 0 -0 30 p40 C DAKOTA COUNTY REAL ESTATE TAXATION ' CITY OF EAGAN ;,,, ,• PUBLIC? IMPROVEMENT ASSESSMENTS - INITIAL TOTALS ?fuiipality ?Cf?iv District # /0 Date , IhiPROVEb1ENT NAhlE TOTAL AM UNT COMNENTS 5r ???? ?d - o? ?oo -030 -os 1?t- ia ?76 ?' 1? 7 ?. /0?.?-i?? y.,... f Seul Y-.7- 42- y9 ?f 90 70744 ?- ??? ? ? ?2?r?/l? - p?? ?y Q dr? ? ?" ? /o -- 0,?9oD ? 0 3 b - ep ?J'er l ces q0_ ? A) Z V 1??9 71- -207yr 940 e -it2frr.? ? ??? le- adc? T1 o.??/ ?,A ?,?74. 7z ?,q. C ??/ aQ m /o ?'or` " r -? 1-? d?r- 3 %-7 /o, s-- ?? . ? HAUGE, FIDE & KELLER, P. A. ATTORNEYS AT LAW WATER VIEW OFFICE TOWER, SUITE 303 1200 YANKEE DOODLE ROAD EAGAN, MINNESOTA 55123 PAUL M. HAUGE KEVIN W. EIDE DAVID G. KELLER LORI M. BELLIN DEBRA E. SCHMIDT OCtObEr 13, 1986 Mr. Thomas Hedges O? f 970 • v??? V? City Administrator 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55121 RE: Aolden vs. Eagan Assessment Appeal Dear Mr. Hedges: AREA CODE 612 TELEPMONE 456-9000 454-4224 Pursuant to the decision in this appeals case published in the October 3, 1986 issue of Finance & Commerce, we were able to make contact with Judge Nierengarten's law clerk in regard to the actual meaning of the decision in that case. As indicated to you before, we have succesefully appealed the Court's award of $5,559.10 reducing the City's ariginal assessment of approsimately $27,043.37. Judge Nierengarten's clerk has confirmed our interpretation of the decision to say that the City's levied asaesament is reinstated and the trial court overruled on the basis that the assessments do not exceed the benefit ta the property. A copy of the deciaion has been served upon Holden's attorney to insure that any appeal time will begin to run. We would request that the City Clerk advise us if there is any difficulty with the County in having the assessment reinatated or the stay lifted, as the case may be. Sincerely, HAUGE, EIDE & RELLER, P.A. David G. Keller DGR:ras cc: Eugene VanOverbeke N 4 - S ;ai - ? ? - - - -- ` ? - - ? r-. --- -?_? - -- _ _ ` - _ t , - ? - - i ? , ' ? - - -- - ji . I o . J ? ( bl ' I I I i J - I r - I ' I I qiii 1????????ue.?? ? ? ,3 + - _ ? - - ? _ - I -- I ? - _-_ - I I I - ? }I? i' I ' _ - I + _j ' ? - - - ' ; -?' - - - - - - - ? I I i , i I L - I ? 71 ? ^ - - - - - .... _. . _ _ _ . _ -- - t s - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - ? . ------ ti-- I 7r .Y ? . . __ _ •- . ._ . _ _ _ " _ -- _ I '? i , - 1 . _ . I ._ -_.. ' -.. . ._ __ _ '_ _. . _.. . .. . . ... _. ._ ._ .. . . . _ . _. ..._ . __ - . _'._ ,._ .__ . . ._ . '. .__ _. ._. .:?_. ._':_ _. -- _ -_ -:_ _'. __ .:_?Oe ? ? w•o?? n u.?.l? - - -- -- -- -- i : ? ? s 6 5 i i , e ? 9 e 0 B ? t p P ? ] 4 / !6 S i ? 7 ? g 9 10 0 n i it 13 ? II ? IS ? i i6 11 ? 19 ? I 10 e :i ;1' o?:;°' c : n, . 3830 PILOT KNOE3 ROAD, P.O. BOX 21199 BEA BLOM9UIST EA6AN, MINNESOTA 55121 MOyO` PHONE(bl2) 454-8100 TNOMnS tGAN JAMGS A. .iM!iH VIC ELLI50N THEODORF WACH?ER Councli Miairibars THOMA5 Hk=DGES Ci1y l?,c]r ninistrater EUG[NE VAN OVER[3EKE Gly G,)rk 3une 19, 1986 Darrel Holden 4232 Blackhawk Rd ? Eagan N!N 55122 ?RE: 10 02900 030 05 10 02900 060 05 10 02900 070 OS Dear Sir: You were in City Hal1 requestistg that the City remove ce.rtazn special assessments from your properties, because you were successful in aopeali.ng the amount of your assessments. The City has appealed that decision and, based on the opinion of City's ?egal counsel., tne C7ty's special assessment staf[ wi11 not process ariy channes to the assessments on your properties. Any changes wi-?? be processed after r.esalution of the case by the Appella*e Court. If you have additionai questions, pl,ase contact me at the City. Sincerely, ?h? . ??•G?? ? ???,?-??,a.?e'..-?''?''?,' Gerald Wobschall SPecial Assessments j GW/dk ? i f TNE ! CJNE 4AK TRGG . TIPTSYiV?POL OF S??ENGTH A^.?'? GROW?N !N G'UR COf+/IMlJNfYY ' oF aagan THOMAS EGAN Moyor PATRICIA AWADA SHAWN HUNTER SaNDRA A. MASIN THEODORE WACHTER Council Members December 28, 1994 Mr. Mark C. McCullough Attorney-at-Law Skaar and McCullough One Financial Plaza, Suite 1900 ` "0 South Sixth Street . ineapolis, MN 55402-1893 Re: Your Clients: Darold and Mavis Holden 4232 Blackhawk Road Eagan, MN Taa Parcels: 10-02900-070-05 10-02900-030-05 Dear Mr. McCullough: THOMAS HEDGES City Administrator E. J. VAN OVERBEKE City Clerk In response to your letter of December 13, 1994, I apologize for not answering the specific question to your satisfaction in my letter of October 28, 1994. The Holden parcel was assessed at the $25,319.37 rate and not at the $11,000 rate with a defenal o€ the difference. When Mr. Holden chose not to accept the City's settlement offer and to exercise his appeal rights, the settlement offer was taken off the table. In the appeal process the City deals with the outcome as determined through the judicial system and expects appellants to do likewise. We do not incur the expense of an appeal only to provide the property owner to after the fact choose what would be his/her most beneficial course of action. When Mr. Holden did not prevail through the appeal process he no longer had the settlement option available to him. W. Holden was assessed at the rate allowed through the appeal process because he chose not to accept the City's settlement offer. His rate was not different than other parcels because he exercised his appeal rights. MUNICIPA! CENTER 3830 PILOT KNOB ROAD EAGAN, MINNESOiA 55122-1897 PHONE: (612) 681-4600 FAX;(612)681-4612 TDD: (612) 454-8535 THE LONE OAK TREE THE SYMBOL OF STRENGTH AND GROWTH IN OUR COMMUNITY Equal OpportuniTy/Affirmative Action Employer MAINTENANCE FACtLITY 3501 COACHMAN POINT EAGAN, MINNESOTA 55122 PHONE: (612) 681-4300 FAX: (612) 681-4360 TDD: (612) 454-8535 MARK C. MCCULLOUGH DECEMBER 28, 1994 PAGE TWO Please contact me if you have any additional questions. Sincerely, E.J. anOverbeke Finance Director/City Clerk cc: Director of Public Works Colbert EN/j eh ce r'-e fl?. ? ? J 7-1,, , - r,e , ?ce Il`e c.- /6 a ri( ' ?y ?r ?e rf lh -o yrZ ? t as.r r.fJ /'+r 70-?? r o ? Y? ?to??Pit t? 002 l?'( ? ??.r ? ? a v .? ? A- 0 jal.2, , / c ? /p .-/,- :%? el` / .??'?.r c ?/•? ?'•?? ; /? eto, / 0 SKAAR & MGGTJLLOUGIi ATTOF.NEYS AT I.AW ONE FINANGIAI. PLAZA, SUITE 1900 120 SOUTH SIXTH ST$EET MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55402-1893 MABB C. MaQULLOUGH EEX L. BUXTON HA$VEY E. SK1lA$ OF GOUNSEL December 13, 1994 E. J. VanOverbeke CITY OF EAGAN 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55122 TELEPHONE (612) 333-1511 FAX (612) 333-1523 Re: Our clients: Darold and Mavis Holden Property address: 4232 Blackhawk Road Eagan, MN Tax Parcels: 10 02900 070 05 10 02900 030 05 Dear Mr./Ms. VanOverbeke: Thank you for your letter of October 28, 1994. Mr. Holden's concern is that in 1985 he was presented with an agreement which provided that if he did not appeal the $25,319.37 assessment on Parcel 030-05, the initial assessment would be reduced to $11,000.00, which would be amortized over a period of years, with the difference of $14,319.37 completely deferred until the conditions set forth in paragraph 2(A) of the agreement occurred. It is Mr. Holden's understanding that because he appealed the assessment and did not accept the agreement, the entire $25,319.37 was assessed against his properiy and amorLized over a period of years. Apparently the nonappealing landowners were assessed at the lower initial figure of $11,000.00, with the balance deferred, and were additionally given the area credit and single family rate credits that Mr. Holden did receive. The only question is whether the Holden parcel was assessed at the $25,319.37 rate or the $11,000.00 rate, which apparently he would have received if he had not exercised his appeal rights. The Dakota County Auditor's Department has sent me some history of the tax payments for this parcel; however, it does not answer the question regarding the initial tax assessment against the property and whether the nonappealing landowners were given the deferral program. s Q ,, t ?. ?9 ? ?re CITY OF EAGAN December 13, 1994 Page 2 I would appreciate it if you would address this specific question to determine whether or not Mr. Holden was assessed at a different rate than other parcels because he exercised his appeal rights in 1985. Thank you for your assistance, and please call me if you have any questions. Very truly k C. Mc,eu%lough MCM:jh Enclosure cc: Darold and Mavis Holden P.S. I just received the enciosed fax, showing a$26,042.27 original assessment on parcel 10 02900 030 05. MCM 12i12i94 09:48 DAKOfA C0-AUDITOR'S OFFICE 006 D A' K O T A G 0 W NT Y RE, A L? E S 7 A TE, ? Y N G! U 2 ft Y x I NPNfiia3 SGftEEN 7- 5 P E C YA 1... H S 8' E$ S M E N T. :3 s 'w'*•CUFIRGIVT YCWR irer PWFtCEL TDa 10 0290m o3o 05 pC•`t T UE elb oia 160 ? ' • BALANG? ? Ahi1V"i}RIIVC CUR°iliV'i' CUR--ZNSTl..M"I" A17J--OFtIS TDTAL : 10537. 29 10537.29 ' 1785.15 1E93.. 15 3078.30 8604P.. R7 ' • ? 3AN 3W TRK ' Qt. 00 • 29. 02' •?. 32 31.34 722. 62 124 FI RST--YFt i 1969 25 YEARS F I R5T- I NT v .10330 OES° x tJ71 .08000 aEW L. 317 P-672. 63 42 327. 40 772.82 ' 668164.1 .19300 REM~INT: . 105vio W/L.'CRFi3},7 • ?1?„ ?".+6 ?.'."51. 7b ' 1 ? ?,;. ,"".?9 C'63. 30 C'E76. 40 g9?.''. FIftST-YFt: x985 15 YERK3 FIR3T--INT: .19300 KEe--YN"t'e .10*00 a..?"LHT317 'r81b: 93 4 106. 4'1's 994 F I FiST-7(fi : 1185 15 YEAFtS FI FtS'T-YlVT C. 19300 REO-I NT :. 10*00 PRE58 ENTER'FL3R M[3RE FtECURUS TRANSFER Tfl 5Cf2EEIV h1UMBERa PM=k--MAXht MENt,I i=FD-XiVGitlTfiY ME141.1 F`F6--NEX"f IA PF7-FI;RST SA PF9--PAGE FCJFZWARD 48O ta . . . iVWMI- r=PC ..IhEE i2l. Cpl.'77 n A ti a T A c U U N T Y R E W L E 8 7 AT FE N r? -u aR Y X t NPNO23 SCPEEEN 7 '5 P E C I A L. A 35 E 5 3 M E N T 8; era Gt,1FiFtEM'f' YEAFt ?r4r wAFi?EL zD e 10 0a'300 030 00 , AC`ri vE 00' mrn 00 BA4.fi1V(;E ' ANN-PRING.-, : CUR-411V7 GUR°INS7`E..MT AD,!"'DRt6 SERV 676. 12 . 1 12. 67 8,.?.. 8uz' 195. 5m 1577. 4Ci x 296 FIFlST-Y R m 1906 14 YEAR£3 F x RST-x IV'F .-.: ?=1 BJ5mO f#EG- I EVT :. 105100 ?'a"CpRM Lp1' 70«'7'S , . x 1.7'7, 67 20.44 164-t 92 1297 FIRST-YR: 198E+ 14 YEAftS FIRSI"-IW'1'e.3.VJ500 ?ECa'-?N7t .10500 Si'OF3M TA.K . . 2358.294 -37,3.02, 2Q0w 8t7 L7C3I. 7al 5RWG• 36 ie96 FIFiRT--YRi 19a6 14 YEAFiR FIRgT-I14Tm.. i05mm qeG--INT: .10500 S'CREE'T 30320k0 305.3:5 .37t-.43 876.78 .7074. 90 la9t3 FIFiS7-YRi 19E36 14; YEWFtS, PYF2S7--XRI7a .10500 i??D-INT= .10500 LA:3T PAUE - FiEDULAR H38E35MENT:3 TRpN5FER T17 SCREE{V IVUMHER: _..........?.... ...«.»?.,.r..«....?..............»?_ ?.....,w...,,,.???.......,.?...,._Y,.y.._.?W_......:___.?...a_...__......_...____?.?.,_r,..,..........._...,,._.. PF4-^MAIN MENU PPM-YNGlUxFiY MENU PF.6^NExT I13 PF'7-'FX-hZS7 SA PFt''j-WPAQir' P''QFiWWnD 4131 ? . H . ' ? IVEJM .rr-=PG l. X NE t'-1 .r.Gli,. 77 , DCSD EAGAN TEL:612-454-1354 Jan 31'42 8:47 No.005 P.03 . . . . . - , ?..? f AUQITOR#S OFFICE. DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESQTA DELINQUENT TAX INVOICE PARCEL ID& 10 02900 030 os DAROLD L & !lAVIS I H01.DEN 4232 BLAd(HAW1C RD SAINT PAUL Mii 55122-2204 INVOICE DATE: 06/31/I994 LEOAL SrCTION 29 7WN 27 RANGE 23 pT oF Nw 1!4 OF NE 1/4 COM NW COR E 244.1 FT TO CEN RD S 5D E ON CEN 209 FT YO PT OF BEq E 242 FT S 50 E'37.3 FT E 807.37 Fr TO 1/4 1/4 LlNg 3 196 FT W 463 FT R2D 30M 165•4 FT R lOD 214 FT L 14D 30N TO CEN RD NE QN CEN TO BE8 SUEJ TO 100 FT Rn ESNT 29 2723 YEAR HMSTD TAXlASSES PENALTY COST IbtEREST TOtAL DtlE 1990 H 2,382?5 8° 1D.00 ?76S.b4 3,595.4$ 1941 M . 4.940.90 494.09 1.449•33 6.884•32 1992 H 4,628.28 462.83 84$.52 5,939.63 1993 H 4,271.36 427.14 313.23 5,011.73 TOTAL 16.223.12 1,622.32 10.00 _3,l 3 r, AMOUN't DIIE IS EFFECTIYE IF PAID T11RU AtIA 31, 1994 NAKE CH!'q( PAYADLE Td DAKOTA COIfMTY TREASUREit,# AND REtuRN ro DAKOTA CQUNTY AUDYtORIS OFFICE, ALONB MITN THI5 INYOICE. IF YDU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS REOAROINA TNIS STATfMENT. PLEASf CALL csiz) 438-4375 OR 1-800-247-1054 08i31i94 13:20 DAKOTA CO-AUDITOR'S OFFICE ? 002 . SCREENS 26s29&30 REAL ESTATE XrvWUIRY - NAME/AD ? . ARI?'SS/LEDAL XINRNO03 pARCEL ID r10 0a9oo 030 05 PI.,AT MAMlEs SlkCT S QtV aqJ TWIV E7 RAWG? a3 . LE6ALa F'T OF NW i! A i7F IVE 1/ 4 CdM " NW COR E 244.1 FT TO GEN RD 5; 5p E ON CEN 2 09 FT T!] PT SPECIRL i?..99ESSME1VT8 UF PEO E?4R FT 8 Op E 57.3 . ? E $o7.37 F-r ro 1i4 1i4 Y?ELINIiUENY LA9T AND/QR pf'tEit YEARtS) LIlV E3 196 FT W E 463 FT R2U • 34M 185.4 F1' R 1OD 214 FT L. 14LI 30M '#'Q CEN RD NE phl GCN FIRST DIVT9ION: TO BEQ Si„IB.I TO L?'!q F'1" RD LAST DIVISIONa ESMT• FEE CURREt+lT OWhER: • Cg 2723 DHF24R.D L& MAV Y 3 I Hbi..DEN •. 4239 131,..ACKHAWK RD . ,-- .. . . . SAIN'1" PpUL MN 35122--ea49 TIiANSFER TO 8GREEM NUMBER: PF'8-WSCRQLL FQRWpliD . . DA"t'Ea 08f 31 /94 . -DAKOTA GAUN'rY AUDITORS X IIVRNFJF3T 1'13AN81=ER T!]A ? AELI1rOMN17' TAX INQUIRY CALC IJATax 08 31 1994 . ' . ABBR LEGAL : SgCT I ON 23 7WN 27 RANGE 23 F'fiFtCEL IDt iCj 02s00 034 05 p7 OF 1VW 1/4.OF NE 1/4 CDM OW1VEr! R DAiiOLD L6 MAV Ii3 I HOLDEN , EVW CQR E 244.7 FT TO CEN RD NDbFYESSe 4e3a SL.pCKHAWK RD 8`5D . E Opl CEN 209 FT TQ PT ' .130 HE#3 Ea42 F7 8 5D E57.3 SAINT RAUL MN 55122-2209 Ff E 807.31 FT TO 1 J4 1/4 . L4NE S 196 FT W 463 F"F R2D 29 2723 YEAR #^!!N TAX tA .F'i?`iE?'a AEtUf•3l..TY GObT I NTEFtEF'aT • 7'C1T'nL. DUE 1990 H 2382. 5a 238.26 10.00 1964. 64 3,.','35. 4a 1991 I-1 4940.90 494.09 1.449.33 6884. 32 1992 H .4629. ie 462.83 :848. 5? . 5939. 63 1993 M 4271„ 3fa 427.14 ;313. .'3 5011.73 TqTAL : iC,aa3. la 16ae. ;3e 10.00 ' AMUNT DI.lE 18 EFFEGTIVE THRU AUCi 31: 1994 --- --- ---- -PF2 iZE3URN?W Fq M?.IVU_.._._...._PFS UEL MEIVUPF6? 2 1431. 16 -----__-------- kiWt1 Pr$ FWA ? ,?,. ? . . . ? . . . :...?:-? ...- _. . ?.? . ._. _ . .. . .. sro:t% usj+p:6 5P po_ ow:rES aEL VKv VR:rES kktE t.IM? s?wiiii?o$ "i JD?a?e[Tr:Nn ? 40 02M 030 83 cCf iICME 1943 t00Ps • • . StAJE p11I8 ATD: 484.i6 E1?fiA?t [Ifil Y M p . . . . ?. . . i 45. [!Tr • . ? .. ?1 Of Nfe Its Os ? 114 [011 t1fT MMacTr 6RS tCA'= ? S7MDR1 3i8.Ss 33 f? 4232 6L1?CRi?1??r[ ? i i FT T ' . 0t OEG I FT S So f?Sr.3 . w : f0 KA' , flp .06 fT Es07.3r F1 TO i/i 1/t TI t[AP ??1fY NMRESSt S " ? EMJ?M ?? . 144 30?1 '!O tHl Itb iiE pt tEM? ? ftEl?ilf rutCA SQ A6 tv {R: 1 ?Gid . 110 ?0 i0? 611 td OE6 Kw OIA . . . OrilE1! ?p?lE: if? ??ME . . • . . . . ................ ._........ ...... .......___.._ ......................_................._.._.._.._.._.._..____..._................. 8AL OW? s M?1..?13jl.a ........ .. <?Z71.36 _• ...........•----.._..__-? 657R [R ..... ....... .................... ................ ................... _._...... ?? ........._...... . .., .. .. ? . ° • :.. T iR s IffT TAx : 'I f.?•'? i4t ASS£Si1NtSs • • SpFtl1115. ss ? 124 ? 264 i 99i ?SO.SO ? ` • -- A9Me iX L ? 71.36 .2 srPe ??.u - . 1797 ? ?. . - . , . , . ?, . ... . ? 9 n?qnt? n30 OS . 4.271.3?i DAROLD ?. & ?IAVIS I NaL?3EN 'i 993 G .? __--- - 08/31/94 13:22 DAKOTA CO-AUDITOR'S OFFICE 005 ,.. , 0 ? r ! M t)i ? 0? iD•? J 0 0 M) W ? 0 IVOI 1 ? ` ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? 1- eo ? #--1 ? H S Q r vrn z ? ? ? rn ? 0 . ? p l ?? ? .? ; „ 8 g ? . ? . fd , . ? . . . H ? ? ? . 0? ?P'I ?u • I9 Ja ? ., t . . to K ? P 0.; ?? ?. ? w .6 .. .. s, ?0 :6 i. .. P. .. I• h ? ? a rn N t 1-1~ In fip? ? .? M FA a P S$ g8$ !?? ~ . .? n? . _....... .--?- ------...._. ..--------._...... ? -----_._.....-- . ....__.-------- _....... _.... _ ..---...._.......- ? . . ? ? . .. . . .. . .. -. . . . _ . . .. ? - ? . . . _ . . _ . .. . . ? . ... ' . .. ? y . • . . -. - . • .. • .. " ..: ? .. .. ..i ? .:?. : ?.a . . w ' . . . - .. . -..?•-'?' _ _ '. ?- . - .. ? .'? •. _r wi•.? . . . ... ' .. . . . .v .?.. .?• .?.v .`-. ?....? • ' .. . .. . . ? . .:,.... , -h....??...?.?.a..i .1 ._...eL"... n_..... •' ? ' _ . . . . . .« .a ' . .. R , .. .r.. ...?...?. .? -_• .. .. ... .. >.. .. ..-,? ? I ilY PAY:MD ? ? C7;0000 m -? V ? . ? o . u7 ? ._._..._.... _........._.._.? O ca ? ¢. 0 U • 2.99?.?D ¢ ? o . T iWTW ? LSt A 0 =US-M m ? N M e-f V .._... U) ? f") 00 m W fl2M 030 OS S10:196 WSMDsG SP lNDx iIMStO PU:'+`ES DEL PWEV Yrt:YES RAiE 0.83971D0 tOAtTI6: S AG DELAY PAY:tm :tri' FIiiE 1490 COOP: LQ/W: ACCT #q: iP StW:W TI PJ4i0.1Fr7:0i000 ? EJIK`,la[ [iTY STATE PA2D ASD 1.032,w 1. T ; 0 T4i lpKi: 343aQ ClfY . ta2,?5 j 4232-?[K#IAMC RO ? PT QF IW 9/4 t!F ? '1!4 1?k 9!T ;LAP: .029 SC?IOOL . 633.?3 C T ; OF BfG E '?G fT S SD E 57.3. FO TCAp 0 PlOPftiTlr ApWS$: fi EW.3i fT FO 1/4 f/i TI t[M : G i1Sf? . .b0 t i M 1 liD W?d [EN RD 11E Cw [Ew QEM ? . .00 NStA a?? ?: f? wYE T0 9EG sa?ei ro too ft 00 arA . . 8rr4.G?6 ? pv ts: oa ? . 42'S2 Bt.ACKtaMi#t RD 8At OIiE a 2.3?2.iB : fJ1 I 0 : 119.13 DSTR Clt: F . ?'.'. -._.._..-. ." ".. --------------- ................_.._....._.._.._..........._.._..... ........... ._..._.._.......... ........... , ? ./ ? .........?.?L"?f3 ........ .e?. .. ... .._.- ..... ... ........ .... _............. . ........... ... ..._....._.._.._ r5: . [?11. JtS5E - . TOT Zo . OcIr : 86i.06 i ? 40.46 qEt1I?. S 992 327_04 3299 t_084:Q2 Sil TA7/YL: 3_91at_t? ? TAX PD/AEF m tlft arf ViD DFIY t ? : ? ! r ? f t t 4 . } ' . ? - • i s ' 90 J 11 ? 14 02440- 030 {}5 2.3$2.5$ DAROLa L & N#AVIS I HOLDEN 1994 J 12 ' : _? ,, _ _? .. •,, . ?? N m ? 'AY :MO 149.52 ? 1,123.64 l461 ? .1m 7, 2 D 9 ta Sl29b0 b3tR OS SlD:196 Y5ND:G SP' iND: MRSTD P1?t:1[FS OEL P?REtif 1fR:1'fS RATE 1.fl4688? tGt?1G: S AG DFLAY PJIY:N?3 3 ECY fit7iE 1992 C?OP: . ? TP S31MT:tiG TI ?OJE[T: ST1?Tf P11ID A1D: 7,741 .56 f+?cAnf titr . -DO DARotb L i l1iWIS I liCl98N itAS+GE 23 Sftiip?k zMi 27 ? sl.G Nwct: iO! iralct:. . , 11,800 45,406 • Ctit??l1Y :• t27-Y _ 287.03 206.44 4232 BS.AAWA4ic NO PT OF Ni 114 Of 1iE 114 COlI 6RS tCAP: 1,124 SCFI00L a lm 425.86 PA?. !M t22- SAiii? S •ON Cflll Tfl Pi OF BE6 E 2ei? f[ S 5O E 57?3 l16itA : fD-?CAf+ : 4 fi ? .0 0 PXWRTY 11DORESS: . 114 FT E 80;.37 ft? Q 714 '[1 iC/1P : O YSiiaS _ 8? 551 ? ? +ra+.zer?i : . ? . ttD 30M in te?t av ?E ou tEa .Var .oa : w?c+? .oo t%MER #tAlE: fEE itAIE ip GEfi 9um! To tC0 FT RO OTA . 1,17+6.70 AG P1f tRe . .flQ L t ..........._. _ ............... .......................... ...._.......... . ........... .............................. ? 4232 BI.ACrstOAK pD .. .........:._............ ............ ........................................ .. ...... . . .. . . ......... ?................:........ ...... .. " : EA ?',t1;Q: ................... ............. . .......... . Op ..... ..............._..._.................... OSfR CR: .............. ............ .OQ GzK..??i Iri SS122-220 9 ?' TAx-Pt?30• - '? iC7 CR ?.? CIJ1L ASS'E5?5: : •• - NE7 f1U[ .: SPEtillt 1.17?6.70 424 ? . , • 5 • _ . 1 1 - iit4r St s 5A toTAL: 1.666.55. 3.451.58 i: ? 1296 2' ?k4.7? 6 ?. Tx L ISlt: 4.626.M . C? . . . . ? . ; 14 02900 030 05 4,628.28 DAROLD L&MAV IS IHOLDEN 1992 D 10 . . . . . . . ... : - ? - - ? . .. ..... ? . . . .. . ... .. . . ... ..... .?>-... ,...?-- ?:.: ? _ . _ . ? -- - . :.. _., . . . . ,., . - - . . . ... . . - . . ? . . . . . .. . .. . . . . . , . . 4 city oF eagan THOMAS EGAN Mayor October 28 1994 PATRICIA AWADA , SHAWN HUNTER SANDRA A. MASIN THEODORE WACHTER MR MARK C MCCULLOUGH Council Members ATTORNEY-AT LAW THOMAS HEDGES SKAAR AND MCCULLOUGH City Administrator ONE FINANCIAL PLAZA SUITE 1900 E. J. VAN OVERBEKE , City Clerk 120 SOUTH SIXTH STREET MINNEAPOLIS MN 55402-1893 Re: Your CIients: Darold and Mavis Hoiden 4232 Blackhawk Road Eagan, MN Dear Mr. McCullough: In response to your letter dated October 18, 1994, gleaser: fmd . enciosed a copy of the proposed assessment agreement covering parcel #1,04)2900-03M offered to the Holdens by the City of Eagan. Four propeny owners originally objected to the proposed assessment of Project #317, which provided for the improvements to Blackhawk Road and related utilities. One of the property owners decided to accept the assessments as levied; the other two property owners signed the agreements and thereby took advantage of the deferral section of those agreements. Please see the enclosed City Council minutes of March 5, 1985. I believe the assessments levied against parcel #10-02900-070-05 were not objected to by the Holdens. Specifically, regarding the Holden parcels, in prepazation of the final assessment roll parcel # 10-02900-030-OS was granted a 20% credit to the area, assuming future deveiopment, thereby allowing for future right-of-way. This parcel, as well as parcel # 10-02900-070-05, was assessed for storm sewer trunk at a single family rate. An additional connection charge may be required if the property is rezoned or develops at a higher classification. Both of these assessment policies can be looked at as deferrals, however, they were applied consistently to all property in the final assessment roll. I believe the Holden's property was treated no differently than the property of non-appealing landowners. To my knowledge, there were no other deferral options presented ta any nan-appealing landowners. If you have specific information to the contrary, I would be happy to review it and to respond. MUNICIPAI CENTER 3830 PIIOT KNOB ROAD EAGAN, MINNESOTA 55122-1897 PHONE: (612) 681-4600 FAX: (612) 681-4612 TDD: 1612) 454-8535 THE LONE OAK TREE THE SYMBOL OF STRENGTH AND GROWiH IN OUR COMMUNITY Equai Opportunity/Affirmative Action Empioyer MAiNTENANCE FACIUiY 3501 COACHMAN POINT EAGAN, MiNN6SOiA 55122 PHONE: (612) 681-4300 FAX; (612) 681-4360 TDD; (612) 454-8535 HOLDEN ASSESSMENT OCTOBER 28, 1994 PAGE TWO The Holdens and not the City chose to use the court appeal process rather than to accept the terms of the proposed assessment agreement. I believe they were treated in a manner that was fair and consistent with the other benefitting property owners. Please contact me if you have any additional questions. Sincerely, ? E.J. VanOverbeke Finance Director/City Clerk cc: D'uector of Public Works Colbert Enclosures EJV/jeh . •?.?.. ;t 900 ?t? CITY OF EAGAN ASSESSMENT AGREEMENT HOLDEN PROPERTY THIS AGREEMENT dated this day of February, 1985t between CITY OF -? EAGAN ("City") and DAROLD L. HOLDEN and MAVIS I. HOLDEN, husband and wife ("Owner) of 4232 Blackhawk Road, Eagan, Minnesota; WHEREAS, the City proposes to assess the following described premises in Dakota County, Minnesota, owned solely by Owner: Part of the NW 1/4 of the NE 1/4 commencing at the NW corner, thence E 244.7' to center line of BZackhawk Road, thenee S 5 degrees E on eenter line 209' to point of beginning: thence E 2421, thence S 5 degrees E 57.31, thence E 807.37' to 1/4 I/4, thence S 1961, thence W 4631, thence right 2 degrees 30" 185,41, thence right 10 degrees 2141, thence left 14 degrees 30" to center line of Blackhawk Road, thence NE on center line to beginning, sub;;ect to 100' road easement, and except Minnesota Department of Transportation Right-of-Way Plat No. 19-39, all in Section 29, Township 27, Range 23, Dakota County, Minnesota. for the following improvements pursuant to City Project 317: sanitary sewer, water, storm sewer and streets; and, WHEREAS, on February 5, 1985, the Eagan City Council approved the levy of $25,319.37 in assessments for said improvements against said property, sub;;ect to the right of Owner and City to agree withfn 30 days of said date to the levy of $11,000.00 of said assessments and the postponement of the remainder until the occurrence of certain conditions; and, WHEREAS, Owner and City desire to enter into such an agreement; NOW THEREFORE, upon consideratfon of the mutual covenants herein, the partfes hereto agree as follows: 1. The City shall immediately assess the above described property in the sum of $11,000.00 for the above described improvements pursuant to the schedule attached hereto as Exhibit A and made a part hereof. 1 , .?. 2. Upon the happening of any of the following conditions the remaining assessments shall be levied or a connection charge in lieu thereof made in the man6er specified in paragraph 3: A. Sale of any portion of the property, except that if after such sale the property continues to be used as it is currently used, the remaining assessments shall not be levied at such time of sale. Upan any sale the City shall review the intended use, and if the intended use does not change the current use, the remaining assessments shall not be levied at that tine. B. The property is split or platted. C. The property is rezoned. D. The property is developed. E. A building permit is issued for a residence on the property. 3. Upon the happening of any of the conditions specified in paragraph 2, the remaining assessments as described in Exhibit A shall be levied at the standard City assessment rates in effect at that time. 4. Owner hereby waives the right to appeal the assessments of $11,000.00 to be levied, and if Owner does appeal such assessments, this agreement shall be null and void and the assessment of $25,319.37 shall be immediately certified to Dakota County. 5. The Owner agrees for himself, his heirs, executors, administrators, successors, and assigns, that if the actual use of said property is changed in the future to a use or zoning category which is assessable at a higher rate than the rate for the present use, the City may reassess ar levy a supplemental assessment at such time equal to the difference between the assessment for the new land use and the assessment for the present land nse at the assessment rates, accordfng to.City policy, in effeet at such future time. 2 . • ?. 6. This agreement shall run with the land and binds the heirs, executors, successors, administrators and assigns of Qwner. 7. The Owner, for himself, his heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns hereby waives notice of any and aII hearings necessary and waives ob;;ection to any technical defects in any proceedings related to any such future assessments or eonnection charges and further waives the right to ob;,ect to or appeal from any such future assessments or connection charges made pursuant to this agreement. 8. The undersigned hereby agree that this agreement may be recorded with the Dakota County Recorder and that the Owner shall execute any and all documents necessary to iMplement the reeording of this agreement, ineluding the delivery of the Owner's Duplicate Certificate of Title to the affected lands if necessary. 9. The undersigned includes all of the persons, firms or corporation that hold an interest in the land described above, including the fee title owners, contract for deed vendees or vendors or holders of any other interest under contract for deed, option or otherwise. The undersigned have read and understand the above agreement and hereby bind themselves to it in all respects. OWNER Darold L. Holden By: CITY OF EAGAN Mavis I. Holden Zts Mayor Attest: Its Clerk This Document Drafted By; APPROVED: Public Works Director Hauge, Smith & Eide. P.A. 3908 Sibley Memorial Highway Eagan, MN 55122 Thamas A. Colbert (612) 454-4224 EXEMPT FROM STATE DEED TAX 3 . •••?t .s•?.' ' • STATE OF MINNESOTA) ) ss. COUNTY OF DAKOTA ) On this day of 1985, before cne a Notary Public within and for said County, personally appeared BEATTA BLOMQUIST and EUGENE VANOVERBEKE to me personally known, whQ being each by me duly sworn, eaeh did say that they are respeetively the Mayor and Clerk of the City of Eagan, the municipality named in the foregoing instrument, ard that the seal affixed to said instrument was signed and sealed on behalf of said municipality by authority of its City Council and said Mayor and Clerk acknowledged said instrument to be the free act and deed of said municipality. NaLary Public STATE OF MINNESOTA) ) ss. COUNTY OF DAKOTA ) On this day of February, 1985, before me a Notary Public within and for said County, personally appeared DAROLD L. HOLDEN and MAVIS I. HOLDEN, husband and wife, to me known to be the persons described in and wha executed the foregoing instrument and acknowledged that they executed the same as their fr ee act and deed. Notary Public 4 , ' • i .* ..Jr _ ? . EXHIBIT "A" Assessments to be levied immediately: > Sanitary Sewer Lateral Lateral Benefit from Water Trunk Storm SeWer Lateral $ .6,681.4i a 2,276.40 $ 2,042.19 $ 11,000.00 Remaining assessments to be levied in the future at standard City rates in existence at future time of levy: Services Storm Sewer Lateral (7.46$ of standard rate) Storn sewer trunk Street Council Minutes March 5, 1985 PEACEFUL HEIGHTS ADDITION - PLANS AND SPECS - CONTRACT #85-2 The next set of plans brought before the Council concerned Peacefui Heights Addition streets and utility improvements under Contract #85-2 and it was recommended they be approved. Mr. Colbert explained the revisions to the plans and Smith moved, Thomas seconded the motion to approve the detailed plans and specs and to authorize the Clerk to advertise for the bids to be published in the legal newspaper with bid opening to be held on Friday, March 29, 1985 at 10:30 a.m, at the Eagan Municipal Center. All members voted yes. ,. BLACRHAWK ROAD - SPECIAL ASSESSMENT DEFERMENTS - PROJECT #317 On February 5, 1985 the continued final assessment hearing for four property owners along Blackhawk Road was held with final assessments being adopted with revisions. The City Attorney's office prepared agreements cover- ing three of the properties including Holden, Kruger and Tscherne. Al1 of the property owners were present and Tschernes and Krugers indicated they were willing to sign the Agreement, but Mr. & Mrs. Holden were present and objected to the amount of the assessment against their property. Tom Colbert explained the provisions of the agreement and it was noted that as long as the uses do not change, then the assessment provisions will remain without revision. Darold Holden requested to have an extension of 60 days in order for him to contact his attorney regarding the assessments and Councilman Thomas suggested the Cauncil allow addikional tim,e i.n order to perfect his appeal. Councilman Smith stated that the Holdens were given an opportunity on February 5 to sub- mit any appraisal information that they had and they did not do so, although Mr. Holden, on March 5 submitted a letter from Mark ParranCo regarding the valuation of the Holden property. City Attorney Paul Hauge indicated that the 30 day appeal time was juris- dictional under the Minnesota Statutes, but that the Council could waive any objection to an extension of time. It was noted, however, that the appeal time wouid soon expire and that it would be safest for the Holdens to perfect their appeal if they wish to do so. Councilman Egan stated the attempt was to assess an average of $11,000.00 per unit, and thus the amount for the amount of the assessment against the Holden property. Egan moved, Wachter seconded the motion to approve the Kruger and Tscherne agreements, subject to execution by the property owners. All members voted yes. Smith then moved, Egan seconded the motion to extend the period of time for acceptance of an agreement from Mr. & Mrs. Holden, noting however, the statutory appeal time is 30 days from the adoption of the assessments on Feb- ruary 5, 1985, but that the City Council will not object to the affection of the appeal for an additional 30 days beyond March 5, 1985. All members voted yes. BUILDING INSPECTION DEPARTMENT TRUCR , Tom Hedges indicated that quotes have now been received for 1/2 ton pick- up tor the Building Inspection Department and noted the low quote was from Southview Chevrolet in the sum of $8,917.00. Smith moved, Thomas seconded the motion to approve the low quote and authorize the City to acquire the truck from Southview Chevrolet. All members voted yes. 12 Council Minutes May 17, 1983 D9KQTA CQDN'L'Y PLdT #1 - CoNnAGT f-83-6 The plans and specifieations were submitted for Contract #83-6 covering the Dakata Caunty Plat #1, streets and utilities and the installation of sidewalk alang the west side of Rahn Raad from Cliff Road to Rahn Park under Projects #370 and P367. There was discussion concerning the acquisition of an easement from A1exa Burow for the sidewalk and Mr. Hauge stated that the easement has not been acquired at the present time. Smith moved, Wachter seconded the motion to approve the plaris and speeifications for Contract #83-6 to authorize advertisement of bids, to be opened at 10:30 a.m. on Thursday, June 16, 1983 at the City Hall; further, ta authorize the city attorney's office to commence condemnation action to acquire the necessary right-of-way if negotiations for the acquisition of the easement are not suecessful. A11 voted yea. CQNMCT #$3-8 - BILAG_KR!W-K ROA} - STftE.jTS & C?TILITIES The plans and specifications for Blaekhawk Road streets and utilities for Contract #83-8 consisting of Project #317, and trunk storm sewer L'or I-35E as it crosses Blaekhawk Road undzr Project #354, together with street surfacing of Blackhawk Road, under Project #355 were submitted. There was discussion concerning the aequisition af easements and it was noted by Paul Hauge, that of seven easements to be acquired for the road right-of-way, three have now been acquired and four are still being negotiated. However, the quiek-take condemnation proceedings have been eommenced. Smith moved, Thomas seconded the motion to approve the detailed plans arid specifications for Contraet #83-8 and authorize the Clerk to advertise for bids to be opened at the City Ha11 on Fri.day, June 17, 19$3 at 10:30 a.m. All voted yes. COI+IITRACTOR LICENSIATG ORDIFiAATCE AMENDMMT The Council diseussed the praposed amendments to Section 6.42 concerning eontraetor licensing regarding performance bond and insurance for homeowners who are construeting their own improvements. The draft of proposed ehanges was sub mitted by the City Attorney. Egan moved, Wachter seconded the motion to continue consideration of the issue but that the staff be directed not to enforce the band insuranee provisians until the Cauncil acts upon the recom- mendations. All voted yes. CHECKI.IS? Upon motion by Wachter, seconded Thamas, it was resolvzd that the follow- ing checklistsbe approved, dated: Apri1 29 and May 17, 1983. A11 voted yes. 18 Council Minutes June 7, 1983 ANCON VS. CITY OF EAGAAi City Attorney Paul Hauge reported that an Order has now from Judge Raymond Pavlak of the Dakota County Distriet Court, Co mplaint of Amcon Corporation and 0. J. Sporting Goods Co. eluding the request for the underlying zoning revision to RB-PD. DRgXEI. HEIGHTS ADDITION - ASSESSMEdTS 0 ?'C -146 ?? been received dismissing the in total, in- Paul Hauge reported that a Summoris and Complaint has now been served on the City by the developers of Drexel Heights Addition requesting certain relief regarding assessments for street improvements in Drexel Heights Addi- tion. It was noted that the City has not negotiated a settIement concerning assessments and there was discussion concerning the need to proceed with such a settlement. BLACKHAWK ROAD - EASEMMS Tom Colbert and Paul Hauge reviewed with the Couneil the progress to date concerning approximately 10 easements in the process of acquisition on Black- hawk Road, between Cliff Road and County Road #30. It was noted that 4 of the easements have been aequired and negotiations are being continued on the remaining parcels. Condemnation has been commeneed and the staff was re- quested to continue negotiations, noting the circumstances involving the possible effect on the adjoining parcel of property, ineluding the potential for installing retaining walls, some blacktop driveways, etc. PAFdK LBND - DUTLOT H- PILOT RNOB HEIGFiTS 4TH 9DDITION A letter from the City Attorney dated June 6, 1983 was reviewed con- cerning a meeting held with the proposed developer of Outlot B, Pilot Knob Heights 4th Addition, concerning the settlement of the property acquisition by the City for park purposes. A demand has been made by the property owner and appraisals have been acquired both by the City and the property owner. Be- cause of the big disparity in the appraisaZs, the Council determined that futher cansideration will be given to the acquisitian of-the property, noting that the Council has taken the position that the property is owned by the City. No speeifie action was taken and negotiations will continue. IIHITOG RENLgI. SERYICE - I.R. FINANCIYdG An applieation has been submitted by Unitog Company, a business clothing manufacturer from Kansas City, Missouri, requesting financing for purposes of building a new facility in Eagandale Center Industrial Park. The projeet wi11 consist of a 27,000 square foot one-story building and a request had been made for a hearing far industrial revenue financing in the sum of $I,$15.000.00. Smith moved, Egan seconded the motion to reeeive the application and set a public hearing on tLhe application ior Ju1y 5, 1983 at 7:00 p.m. at the City Hall. A11 voted yes. 16 Council Minutes February 5, 1985 ?., ,.. .-,.,....71 ROSE HILG ADDITION - PROJECT #463 - PIEtAL ASSESSAfEN2S Mayor Blomquist convened thP public hearing relating to the final assessment roll for Projecf #493 and Thomas Colbert introduced the assessment roll and noted that a 5 year spread of assessments at llg interest was proposed. There were no comments from the public and no objections. WaGhter- moved, Egan seconded the motion tQ close the public hearing and to approve the final assessment roll as proposed with a 5 year spread of assessments at 11$ interest. All members voted in favor. WILLFAMS & LaRUE AQDITIDN - FROJECT #422 Mayor 8lomquist convened the continued hearing regarding Project #422, Williams & LaRue Addition which had been continued from the [3ovember 20, 1984 meeting. Thamas Colbert recommended that the hearing be continued indefinitely and renoticed when the Rosemount School District has determined whether the northwest corner of Wescott Road and Lexington Avenue is a viable site for a proposed elementary school. 8e mentioned ttiat he should lcnow mare about the status of this within a week or two. Egan moved, Wachter seconded the motion to continue the public hearing until Eebruary 19, 1985 at 7:08 p.m. and to request staff to contact the school district to determine the status. All members voted in favor. r WEST SERVICE RQAD - YACATION OF PUBLIC RIGBT-4E-WAY Mayor Blomquist canvened the public hearing cancerniny the proposed vacation of public right-of-way of ttie east one-half of West Service Raad, sauth of Center Court. It was noted that the west half has already been vacated. No one appeared in opposition to the vacation. Thomas moved, Smith seconded the motion to clase the public hearing and approve the vacation of public right-af-way over the east one-half of West Service Road, south of Center Court, and to authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute all related documents. Al1 voted yes. PROJECT #317 - GONTIAIIfED FINAL ASSESSMENT REAFtINGS Mayor Blomquist convened the continued final assessment hearings relating to Blackhawk Road and Project #317. It was noted by Thamas Colbert that at the original assessment hearing on September 18, 1984, four property owners had submitted written objections, and that the Council hau continued consideration of the assessments relating to the those properties nntil a later date. He stated that the continued public hearings had bEen noticed by publication and mailing. He stated that the City has had appraisals done relating to all four properties by appraiser, Daniel Dwyer, that the proposed assessments are for assessment at current City rates, subject to a maximum based upon the appraised benefit to the property resulting fram the improvements. With regard to the James and Carol Ashworth property, Mr. CaZbert stated that the amount of the original assessment propose@ on September 18 waa $18,848.62 and that Daniel Dwyer had determined the benefit to be $11,900.95. James D. Ashworth appeared and stated that the assessments would be a severe 6 Council Minutes February 5, 1985 hardship upon him to pay each month and that as to the remaining matters in issue, he would rely on the objection previously filed with the City. Member Egan asked Daniel Dwyer a number of questions concerning his method of appraisal.. Mr. Dwyer indicated that he assumed that the highest and best use for the Ashworth groperty was its present nse with a sinyle fa.mily dwelling, and that while he attributes to the benefits of the improvements to the Iand only, that he did look at the building on the property and determinea that there was no benefit to the building. Councilman Smith stated that $11,000.00 for all assessments was not out of line with the size of the lot and the improvements made and Councilman Wachter mentioned that his assessments were $13,890.00. Mr. Dwyer stated that assessments for these types of itnprovements run in the $18,800.08 to $15,000.09 range in other communities in the area. Councilman Egan stated that the Special Assessment Committee didn't recommer?d a specific assessment, but did recommend that it be set hy the City Council according to the amount of benefit determined by the City's appFaiser, or the property owner's appraiser, whichever the Council determined to be bettPr. Egan move@, Wachter seconc3ed the motion to approve the proposed assessment of $11,900.09 based upon the proposed findings prepared by City stafE with the findings to state also that the assessments will be certified and spread over 15 years at 10 I/2$ interest. All members voted yes. Robert D. Kruger appeared and stated that he had previously submitted a letter to the City with regard to his assessments and also mentioned that he feeZs he has a claim against the City for damages relating to changes to his driveway resulting ftom the improvements. He stated that he could believe the value of his property has gone up even $22,000.08 as the City's appraiser had stated. He stated that he has a well and septic systems on both halves of his property. Councilman Wachter stated that there is a problem with the drivecaay, which is nQw much steeper, but that this is a separate issue from the assessments. Councilman Egan statPd that the Assessmen.t Committee had recommended ta the City Council that it Iaok at any anpraisals presented to it and determine the assessment on that basis. Daniel Dwyer stated that the pfoperty would be worth much more than he determined if it were to tie in with other propertp, but he assumed that its highest and best use was to have two single famiZy dwellings on it, one on the north half and one on the south half. Smith maved, Egan seconded the motian to approve the proposed assessment in the amount oF $22,600.90 in accotdance with the proposed Findings prepared by City staff,' with assessments to be certified and spread aver 15 years at 10 1/2$ interest. All members vated in favor. Thomas Colbert reviewed the propased assessments for the Tscherne property, and stated that the original proposed assessment was $27,124.08, and that pucsuant ta the appraisal of Daniel Dwyer, the assessment would be $17,508.08. Leslie Tscherne appeared and reviewed a letter to the City by the Tscherne's attorney, Daniel 8eeson, which stated that the Tscherne property is unique in that it is-long and natr_ow, has a swamp, would be very difficult to develop, and has a home in the middle of it, that the Gity's appraiser, Daniel Dwyer, has admitted that the highest and best use is for single family dwelling, that Mr. Dwyer's appraisal lacked comgarable sales to substantiate it, that the compar•ables aIl dealt with raw land for development, that there were no before and after values on any of the comparable lots, that a State Supreme Court case had stated that Mr. Dwyer's appraisal technique was not acceptable. Mrs. Tscherne also stated that they had hired an appraiser who stated that the benefit ta .the property was $3,099.80.to $8,800,90, and that _ any appraisal must include the land and buildings. Jay Tscherne stated that 7 Cauncil Minutes February 5, 1985 . . 3 . ?u. the City obtained an easemenL fram the Tschernes based uoon land values of $28,068.80 ger acre and that the assesstnents would require them to pay $390.90 per month for 15 years. Assis'tant City Attorney Smith indicated that Mr. Seeson`s interpretation of the Minnesota Supreme Court case was subject to disagreement, and that it did not necessarily apply to this situation or Mr. Dwyer's appraisal. Mr. Dwyer stated that he did loak at the building in ma[cing his appraisal, and that standard appraisal techniques were usea. Smith moved, Thomas seconcled the motion to approve the assessment in the amount of $17,500.09 to be sgread over 15 years at 10 1/2$ interest with the understanding that if the owners and the City enter into an agreement within 30 days of E'ebruary 5, 1985 providing for: 1. The assessment of $11,000.00 naw. 2. The assessment of the remainder to be postponed until the earliest of the following; a. Devel.opment of the property. b. Rezoning of the property. c. Sale of the progerty. d. Change of use of the praperty from the carrent use with one single famiy residentc to any other use. e. Or, platting of the propert,y or splitting of the lot, except that if the ].ot is sold to a party who does nat change the use from the current use wiLh one single family residence, upon review and determination by the City Council to that effect, the assessment shall continue to be postponed untiZ orce of the above conditions is met, then the assessments shall be approved according to such aqreement with the agreement to run with the land. AlI members voted in favor. Thomas Colbert described the assessments with regard to the Darold and Mavis Holden property and stated that the City's appraisec, Daniel Dwyer had appraised the benefit as a result af the improvements to be above the initial proposed assessments of $27,643.37. DaroZd Holden appeared and stated that the State o€ Minnesota had paid him $29,999.89 per acre for his property in eandemnation proceedinys with sewer and water in the area, and that his pole barn on the north portion of his property would have to be removed far the property to develop as R-3, as it appears in the Comprehensive Guide Plan. He stated that he accepted less than what the.prQperty wa.s worth, and that there is no benefit from the sewer and water through much of his property. Councilmember Egan asked about possible ponding credit and Tam Colbert stated that this would be allowec3 only if the pond an the back of the Holden property is necessary for the City's storm sewer system, anr3 if an easement is granted for ponding purposes. Mayor Blomquist inoved, Egan secandeci the motion to Ievy the full praposed assessments on the two back ].ots, Parcel 60-95 and 79-85, in the amount of $711.15 and $1,012.85, and to levy the Eull amount af the proposed assessments of $25,319.37 against the remaining Parcel 30-03, a1Z to be spread over 15 years at 10 1/2$ percent interest, an the condition that if the City and Mr. Holden enter inta an agreement within 39 days of February 5, 8 Council Minutes Eebruary 5, 1985 • . ??.? 1485, $11,000.00 only caill be levied an Parcel 30-93 at this time, and the remai.nder will be levied only upon the sale or development of the property, rezoning, lot split, plattinq, or the issuance of a buiZding permit for a residence on that property, or if there is a chanqe in the existing use of that property, except that if the lot is sold ta a party who does not change the use from the current use, upon review and detetmination by the City Council to that sffect, the assessment shall continue to be pastponed until one of the abave conditions is met, then the assessments shall be appraved according to such agreement with the agreement to run with the land. All members voted yes. MULTI-FAMILY H4USING REVENUE BQNDS ROYAL OAKS CIRCLE APAR'FMEAIT PROJECT Mayor Blomquist convened the public hearing relating to the application for multi-famiZy housing revenue bonds in the amount of $13,365,589.09 for the Royal Oaks Circle Apartment groject, Thomas Hedges reviewed the proposal in detail and there was considerable discussian concerning the number of remaininq units that the City can allocate to low-income housing for the rest of the decade unaer its goals. It was noted that the City's goal is not binding and that many of the units approved for low-income housing wil2 probably not be built. Mayor Blomquist stated her concern that the City should nat let the market dictate to the City Council the number of low-income units which are approve@ by the City and that a balance of property uses is necessary. She stated her preFerence that the City stay within its plan and not "simply approve multi-family housing revenue bands on a first-come first- served basis. Councilman Egan stated that while balance is important, the City cannot dictate balance but only give an opportunity for balance and that if the property has the prop_er zoning, the City shouldn't discourage development by denying such revenue bonds praposals. An Eagan resident near the proposed apartments stated his desire ta see the area stay single €amily and also stated that the proposed apartments were not aesthetically pleasing. Smith moved, Thomas seconded the motion to close the public hearing and approve the multi-family housing revenne_bonds in the amount of $13,365,000.90 for the Royal Oaks Circle Apartment project as presented by City staff. All members voted in favor except Wachter who voted in opposition to the motion. The Mayar stated that she voted in favor of the bonds because while she believes that it*is important to stay within the City's goal of low incorae units that this project is still in keeging with the gaal. - MULTI-PAMILY 60U5ING REVENUE BONDS - LEMAY GAKE 1ST ADDITION Mayor Blomqnist convened the public hear.ing concerning the application for multi-family housing revenue bonds for Lemay Lake lst Addition in the.amonnt of $13,000,000.90. Thomas Hedges introduced the application and stated that amount actually recommen@ed for approval is $12,560,000.00, which is 88$ of the appraised value, pursuant to City policp. There were no comments from the audience. Counci2man Smith stated that he thauqht the plan was a good one and he moved to close the hearing and approve the multi-family housing revenue bonds in the amount of $12,568,900,00 for Lemay Lake lst'Addition project as presented by City stafE. Egan seconded the motion. All members voted yes, except Wachter who voted in oppositian. Mayor Blomquist stated that she voted in €avor based npon her feelfnq that it is important for the City to keep 9 T Ul t W N_ 0 8? ? z ?rotxt ? ??? 7 H O HC-) H aM eo c? ti roc-)n P 8 c c ? ? • ? 7u ? H ba o ? g? ? k • ? ? y ? U ?zJ b : O ? U ? ? ? n ? ag oo n aosp I o o?o ?o ooaa oo?ooW ocn gb?bffl? g r 0 SS? b p ? ? cn z ? ' Q a m ? vv ? o ?M p, F'• p, O? M O F+• O W ? Z ? ; W ? W ?n o 00 , ? i ? - ? n ? o? ? ooo .o - ? i ? g r ? W rn N ? ? ? N N rnrnrno 0 o ? ? w EA i/f N r\ 0. fR Htt[xcc??f l?O ? j Np? EAO y y? rLO ? N o O? y r C I N ? ? [? C+7 ? i W (U ?D t W ? N t r r O O O Vl . ? ? ? IX ? 00 ? N m ?i rn C, N N _. p i0 O? W r ? InW v W ? W ? ?ll N ? N W ?O D p W r ? N ?1 W r m w r ?p ? w s O ? ? ? rn a o ? w g ? y, 25 V ? N V1 O -?7 N ? ? u? O N ?l V? ?i -7 j r N p? Oo t N W- C r N OD a '3 H j 9 ? r z z ? ? 9 O ? 3 O 7y m • 9 y .w.. 0 O J r r $ r 10 rn o?, i?, N --N N rn rn R°i rn o 0 o z a°za CT7 T N ? ? O v ? N ? ?a ? 10 lJi ? N ?O W N N ?? ? ?p l?.nJl N? W Vl w ? ?mwm? rn?i 3?n?? ?. co ?Tpow???? N O p+ O N O ? ? .'?. .?.. ? ? ..F. ..'?. ? H V? N N ? (A(p O O ? O ? s ? ? OD N N ? O. 10 N ? N N O ? ? ? O n Z ? N W v ? $rn ?' ? ? m"' -5° w rn rnv ? ? ? ? 3 i ? 9 ? w W ? v? ? ?rn ? r w ? "p?Q?rv?w ? "7 W O? ?1 1.0 -.1 W O W N -• G' 10 N 5?7 N N O rlli OD-1 OD-+OW-•1 r 1.0 rn ?n ?n m -j tn ?* , ca Agenda Information Memo March 5, 1985 City Council Meeting Page Twenty-Seven APPROVE AGREEMENT/SPECIAL ASSMT. DEFERMENTS/BLACKHAWK RD. C. Project 317, Approve Agreement for Special Assessment Defer- ments (Blackhawk Road) -- On February 5, 1985, the continued final assessment hearing for four property owners alonq Blackhawk Road was held with the final as5essments being adopted as revised. One of the conditions of the final adoption of assessmerlts provided for the deferment of a specific portion subject to the execution of an agreement by the affected property owners. The City At- torney's office has prepared those agreements to incorporate the conditions of the Council and concerns of the property owners. Enclosed on pages through is a copy of the typical agreement used as a basis for all affected property owners. The City Attorney will be available to discuss any specific dif- ferences as it may apply to each individual property owner. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the agreement providing for the deferment of certain special assessments associa- ted with Project 317 (Blackhawk Road - Streets and Utilities) and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute all related documents. /t -L L;, s/Thomas L. Hedges City Administrator , ???;??--?? _ ,.? l I!l? ?? /? cY SKAAR $¢ MCGULLOUGH ATTOENEYS AT LAW ONE FINANGIAL PLAZA, SUITE 1900 120 SOUTH SIXTH STBEET MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55402-1893 MAEH C. McCULLOU(3A $EX L. BUXTON HA$VEY E. SKAAR OF GOUNSEL October 18, 1994 CITY OF EAGAN Administrative Offices ATTN - City Clerk 3830 Pilot Knob Roacl Eagan, MN 55122 TELEPHONE (612) 333-1:511 FAX (612) 333-1823 Re: Our clients: Darold and Mavis Holden Property address: 4232 Blackhawk Road Eagan, MN Tax Parcels: 10 02900 070 05 10 02900 030 05 Dear Sir/Madam: I represent Darold and Mavis Holden. The Holdens appealed a 1982 special assessment on their property, (which was successful at trial but reversed on appeal). They believe the City has refused ta extend to them the deferral options granted to nonappealing land owners. Would you please send me a copy of all of the City Council's resolutions related to the special assessment project, specifically those apgroving any deferral program for the payment of the assessments. Flease eall :ne :.f you have an1 questions. S, ullough MCM:jh cc: Darold and Mavis Holden PLUMBING (RESIDENTIAL) Permit Application City Of Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Road, Eagan Mn 55122 Telephone # 651-675-5675 FAX # 651-675-5694 Please complete for: Single Family Dwellings Townhomes and Condos when permits are required for each unit Date?/?/ ) -3 Site Address 7 Z 3z- ! ???? &?A? k_0 e9"?_ _ Unit # Property Owner a.-? ?? ? lleiclr Telephone # 14»' Contractor 1104S f2j`1- (l- Address /Oo - 3 t4v 5-7t, City ?i.•?...-??a? State 211Ae-. Zip !E-! Z4 Telephone # (k;-%) ??7'7f`Jy The Applicant is Owner ?Contractor Other Septic System New efurbished Submit 2 sets of plans and MPC license $ 100.00 Includes County fee. Additiona consultant fees may apply. Alterations To Existing Dwelling Unit, Including $ 50.00 Adding fixtures to lower levels or room additions, excluding water softener and water heater ? Abandonment of septic system _ Water turnaround (+ 5/8" meter if needed -$121.00) Other: _ RPZ _ new installation ? repair T, rebuild $ 30.00 _ Lawn irrigation system Water softener Water heater - - $ 15.00 _ replacement _ additional .50 $ State Surcharge Total ? $ I hereby apply for a Residential Plumbing Permit and acknowledge that the i mation_is_com?lete and ccurate; that the work wilt be in conformance with the ordinances and codes of the City of Eagan and wi ?1-'ie um mg &o es; at I understand this is not a permit, but only an application for a permit, and work is not to start without a permit; that the work ?vill be in accordance with the approved plan in the case of work which requires a review and approval of plans. ?fr ?- Applican 's Printed Name plicant's ature N '-"ITE EVALUATIO1 `F SOIL BORINGS .. PERCli T.3'.J SJA.. AND D3J SIGN EAGAN R EVI EWE D 6Y n.? ? ?ce, Lt ? e- e- DATE °? ' ' ° 3 BUILDING iNSPECTIONS DEPT., FOR: `` , l / C,/ G% / 4 ? /? SITE: jv"10 0 5 LGG3 ? BY: JERRY sAUBER MpCx# 925 4317 O ffice (651) 463-7434 ?-tome {651} 463-2597 , . . . .1 . _ . ..._. _?_ . .. ' u?OI1 BOC1pg LOg . • Date. 'Pro'ect Locafion; Tw ? Client: , Bo ' ade by: Address: . ? . Cihl State , 7Jp . '. • Ua tt • ?,?, Borin method; A Pit' Probe :Other 'Color classification s stem: Munsell he? 4l Boring Number • Borfng Number' ':7 Surface Elevatlon . Surface Elevation e Soil type at system depth: Soil type at system depth: . ,, . : Depth Texture -Colof. Depth . Feet , . .. .. . _, _- __•_.. '. Feet Texfure Color -- -- ?`. -- ? 1v?A-f ? . • 2 -- .>4 2 -- .- , .? -- ?e 3_ ' . ' ?_? ` • ? a -- f? ¢_ : c5? ? S57?d ?s 6-- . . . ,. 6- 7 --- ~ ' • ' • 7 --- ? , .. .. ' • SkruCture: .. Blocky Platy Prfsmatfc :• ..,NStt'ucfure: . Blook Plat Y • y Prismatlc None Slope:6-f5, /o ? Slape/, % End of boring at •?'? feek. ; End of'boring at ,5` feet. ' Standing water tab.le: yes no ` Standing water table: es no Present at : feet of d th ' " y •Present at ' : feet of d hours after boring:hoqrs after.boring. Mottled soiL• Mokkled soil: Observed at ?? feet of depth: ' Not present ln boring hole ;- Observed at_-_ ft of depkh. ;N'ot present In boring hole Observations and comments: - ` Ohservations and comments: . oring um er • Surface ElevatIon . Soil type at system dep,th: Depth ,'j`eXtUf? ?COIOf . Feet • - . • • _' w _ -- ---. ?..._. -- - ---, gorfng Number' ? Surface Elevation Soil type at system depth: Oepkh Feet TeXtUfe ColOf v ? • 4?A.1 x?- _ .. ? ^ ??? -- • . ? ,?' 4 J? ? 2 '_ • _. ? . - ?cs?L./ ?` • , 3 " U ? (i Kz ? • ? ? ? ?.. 3 -- ? . - -7- ? -- ' , 7 --- , . 7 .. . . Structure: : Blocky Piaty_ . Prismatlc ::.None , Structure; . Blocky. Platy Prismatlc Nona . Slope: LIL% . : End of bor - ing at • ? feet ' ' . Slope; .. . End oGoring at = feet. Standing water tab.le: yes no Present at ? feet of de ? ? • ?---?? Standing water tabis: , yeid n'o Present at t f . . . hours after bor+ng: .• • e e oep hoqrs after.boring. Mott{ed soi{: Observed at f t f d Mottied soil: ee o epth: . Not present in boring hole -? -,...._.,..,._ • : .; .. . . . , Ob ??? Observed at ?feet p d? th, ;N*ot present in boring hole??. servations and comments:. .. '''' ' Observations and comments: • PERCOLATTON TEST DATA SUEET Test hole location f.•.='?s $ole number / Date test hole was prepar d%/`-?`-6 bepth of hole bottom, /I inches Diameter of hole, ? inches ? Soil data from test hole: ' Depth, inches Soil texture . _.. . __..... ? f ?-- Method of scratching sidewall ? Depth of pea-sized gravel in bottom of hole, ? inches. Date and hour of initial rvater filling Depth of initial water filling, inches a'bove hole bottom. Method used to maintain 1?. ,mc s of waterdepth i?x hole.for at least 4 hours: /?? .:??fA Perc tion test reading ma e (date) start above hole bottom duriniz test, _ a.n< ..rYlaximum water depth inrhPC_ Time Time Interval, Measurement, inches Drop in water, leve}, iuches Percolation rate, minute per inch remarks fJ ? . ? r 4 [? ? 7 C..5 ? /- f r v ? / i / / Percolation rate - miuute per inch. PERCOLATYON TEST DATA SHEET Test hole location Hole number o!2 Date test hole was prepared Depth of hole bottom,?2( inches Diameter of hole, & inches. Soil data from test hole: - Depth, inches Soi1 texture _ Ao-- ? Method of scratching sidewall C- Depth of pea-sized gravel in bottom of hole, ? inches. Date and hour of 'rnitial water f?lling Depth of initial water filling, inches above hole bottom. Me t ho d use d t ma'n ain 12 inches of?vaterde?th in hoie,for at least 4 hours• c Percolation test eading made by; (date) starting _a:rfi:Qj7m.)Maximum water depth above hole bottom durinf! test, inrhac Time Time Ynterval, lYreasurement, inches Drop in wafer, level, inches Percalation rate, minute per inch remarks ? 761 ? , ? ? 7? Z_Z . ? 91- &// Percolation rate - • ruute per inch. PERCOLA7'YdN TEST DATA SHEET Test hole location Hole number -3 Date test hole was pre ared Depth of hole bottom,,?Q inches Diameter of hole, , inches. Soil data from test hole: - Depth, inches .r` . . ..... . . ... .....---,_ Soil texture ?? ? S 'l7cg?"? NLethod of scratching sidewall Depth of pea-sized gravel in bottom of h le, ? inches. Date and hour of initial tivater flling _?`-? ---3- 3` c? Depth of iuitial water filling, _ ? i? inches above hole bottom. Method used to maiutain 12 inches ofwater depth iu hole forat least 4 hanrs: percolation test r?ading made byr (date) starting a above hole bottom durina test, P-m: Maximum watei• depth ?- 111?}1Pc Time ? Time Ynterval, Measurement, inches Drop in water, level, inches Percoiation rate, minute per inch remarks ?ov - 731 r / ? ?v / Percolation rate - ? miuute per inch, 'C t cs /? iHnlvrnT 1AT. .qFWA (;F.TRRATM*FNT SYSTFM WORKSHEET A. FT.Ow gpd Estimated _:0 mcasured __, x 1.5= gpd SEPTTC TANI< VOLUME B. ?•'I?Ae? gallonsi. SOT[,S (Sitc eval46on da.ta) C. Depth to reslricting liiycr =__?' 1, fect O. Maximunt clq?th of s,ystem C-3 I`t (ect.. , t'.. Pcrcolatibn ratc? _,<?? MPI ' I:. SSF ? sq It/gpd ? ' ' TRENCH BOTTONI, AREA ? i hes with'S inches of rock below the e: F tr p p ar enc A x F=?' x4/7 =Mq ft of bottom area I For h-enches with 12 iRChes of rock below the pipe: A x F x 0.8 = x x 0.$ = sq ft of botlom area ?. For trenches witli •18 inches of rock below the pipe: - AxFxO.bb=, x x0.66= sqftofbattomarea K. For trenches tivith 24 inches of rock below the pipe: AxFx0.6=__x x0:6•= ' sqftofbottomarea : 13ED 130TTOM AnEA L ('c?r see;page bi?d5 with 6 or 12 inches of rock betow the p;pe; 1.5 xA x 1' :: 1.5 x_._.. x____. scI fl o( bolcom arc:a ROCK VOLUME TN CU FT M. Rock depth below distributton pipe plus 9.5 foot times bottom area: M=Rock depth + 6 inches x Area (H,1,j,L,K) (-57 + 0.5ft)x??i =2?cuft ROCK VOLUME TN'CU YDS N. Volume in cu ft divided by 27 M•? 27 = cu yds7„S.? + 27 =? cu yds TtOCK WLTGHT 0. Cubic yard.s timcs 1,4 = ton, N x 1 9 = tonsv x 1 4 = 40' tons . .. '1 • UTSTRTI3UTTON . (C:he ck one based on slope) lkd tlcss 1113n .6'/, sla}e) 'I'renche:s ?Drop boxcs (a ny slope) , _, Distribulion box (levcl to slightly sloping) TRENCH LENGTH P. Se)ect trench width =, ft Li. Uivide botlorn area by trench widlll: (H,1, J, or K) + P= line3l (ct;t j? LAWN A7ZEA ? (?. Se1ecttrench :;pacing, ceitlcr tocenter yl o feet S. Multipty trencli spacin?by lineal teet R x Q= sq ft o( lawn area ,?? / x4Qsqft L.AYOUT (Use ofhcr side) 1. Sclecl aii appropria(e scale; one square =?-feet. 2. Show pertinenr property bo.undaries; riglit-of-way, easements. 3. Show location of house, garage, driveway, and all other imorovcments, _cxisting or proposed'• ?4? •-,-, ?. t•I•I?I•!•I?l ??I?I•i.i.:•t -?- :?`.ti•ti•ti?????1 ?????????•?I l•l?I?r'!•!•! % !?l•/.; .,-• t '> 11tC?1 ?.Uvc! - ti•ti,.•ti,•,.?,?.ti...ti•.•...??. :?ti•ti.?.?... •?...`...•..?.i ,- r.r.r,r•? .•r.:•:. i f. f.r.f ..: .,.; . t.?.ti.?, .,..?..,. r•?•r• i•i.i.,. {. . , ???•• •• ; ?n;:h I'i?k ti ?.ti . . i.r.?.r r??•: ??• ti.ti.ti.?. ?.•.?•..? ? f'r•/'?• ?'?'?'?' l i ' ' +I•I•/•/• l•l l?r l• t? \???ti.t??.?•??t????••.?• ` i ? f?f J.l•I•/.t?I?l•I•/•:•I• ?.ti.\. ti.ti 1•t??•\.\??.•,.? ` ? i ? ? } 1??•1.\•?•'. I r,f,l,?rr.?.r?r•t•„ f.?.?? ??ti ?ti?ti.?.ti.?•?•ti.?.??• •• 6•24 incii .? . . kc:e Uclo?u Lhc P:: ? ?.?.?•?.1.?.?.f..?.??i•i•?' ??ti?ti•??ti•ti?ti?ti•??ti????•?••? I?l•l•??r?1?J??•1????•?'?• I ti?ti.ti.ti?ti.??1?1•?.\•\?\••.??? TR.ENCH CROSS-SECTION FINiSHED GR.ADE ORIGINAL GRADE NIA)CMUM TRENCH DEPTH ?? INCBES e- ?._..-.` INCBES oF oRIGINAL GRADE BACKFILL OVER ROCK FILL S OIL TO A MQ,4Il?l OF 6 INCBES OVER ROCK I NONWOVEN GEOTEXTILE FABRIC ( 2 INCBES OF ROCK OVER PIFE I 2" OF ROCK OVER PIPE 4 INCH PIPE 4" DYSTRIBUTION PII'E ? INCBES 4F 3l4" TO 2 1/2" 6- 24 INCBES OF WASHED SEWER ROCKS WASHEI? RQCK BELOW BELOW DISTRIBUTION PIPE DISTRIBUTION PIl'E ? ? ?? INCBES TRENCx wmTH DAK@TA COUNTY MINIMUM SEPTIC TANKi REQIJIREMENTS IN GALLONS No. Minimum Minimum Liquid Bedrooms Liquid Capacity with Capacity Garbage Disposal 2 1125? 1125 " - (750) - '(9125*) ? 3 or 4 1500* ' 1500 * (1ooo) (15oo *) 5 or 6 2250* 2250 ? (1500) - (2250*) 7, 8 or 9 3000* 3000 * (2000) ? (3000 Minimum Liquid Capacity with Garbage Disposal AND Basement Sewage L.ifit 1500 * (1500 *) 2000 * (2000 *) 3000 ? (3000 400+D * (4000 *) Multiple Qompartments or Multiple Tanks lVlinnesota Rules 7080 requirements in () for reference and comparison Multiple Compartment Tanks are required to have a code maintenance hole (man-hole) for each compartment. ? Designers and installers should infiorm home owners of the need to have all compartments pumped. As-built drawings shouid also reference this. Homeowners need to be able to locate afl maintenance holes for the pumpers. Desigr?ers are required to state the correct Dakota County tank sizing for replacement and upgrades. 4t is highly recommended that property transfer compliance inspections indicate whether the septic tank capacity meets the above standard. The buyer would then be ia??oa ?d of the need for additional septic tank capacity requirements before adding a g g disposaf, basement sewage Iift, etc. Questions regarding these items may be directed to your local Municipal Sewage System Inspector. , o:ldepi\emgmt\walmlmrsepcap ; . i • . , . I '. I L. - W ?- ' ? , ?- tI? z 0 ? m ? ? V) x 0 nL 0 .? ? o ,. .;_..._ ?,; ? ? R ? t \ ` ??^ o ? ? ? ? 6 ?? o z G) .???z =r ?nj ?A I? ? ? INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE TREATME?T SYSTEM AS-BUILT RECORD ? ,q Coarse Sand [.? G'? Medium Sand Loamy Sand 0.83 FINESAND 1.67 DESIGNER INSTALLER: ?f1{ Permit No.?^ `?6 Prope ID No. (PIN) (available @ Dak Co Tax Info 651-438-4576) Within ity Twp of Section Date Inspected? House Type?i II III Owner v 1 Installed for? Bedroom r?gaUday arb Disp? Y Project Address Bsmt Lift Pum Now? Y?l(r Future? Y f?Jacuzzi? YQIV DITION NEW EPLACE ? REPAIR ? AD ` ? N 'Soil moisture below plastic limit (dry enough) for construction? Y/ N Soii ompacted? Y/ N Fill Soil? Y/ sca?e Soil Survey Map Unit 8 Symbol: Circle Soil Texture: (Faster than 0.1 m.p.i.) a?{? y? t?y Silt Loam, Silt? Sandy Clay Loam 2. Silty Clay Loam S? f Clay Loam Silty Clay, Clay 4.2 (Slower than 120 m.p. . ? Comments: ?Q3?3 SETBACKS: Prap.Lines 10' i Bldgs 10' to Tank ?llat & 20' to Drnfld`Z.a'? Well DepthsYs?_Source: Orig. Well Record / Measured Weli(s) setback 50' or 100' 1 / not i talled Distance to Lake? Creek_? Wetlan?, Buried Water Pressure Lines 10 t ank & rnfld? System located by GPS? Y Photos? Y/ideo? N SEPTIC / HOLDING TANKV KNew ? Exis ' g Liquid Capacity jlq?n r Z 1 compart ment o 2? Tank Waterti Manufacturer ??ei ?r ? Baffle Type: lasti Fibergl Sanitary- Con , /'? No. of Inspec ipes?4" " iam. Tank Level No./Diam. Manhole Access ?Y`` Inlet / Outlet Cen No. & Height of Manhole Risers - v" New Tanks 4 ft or less below Final Grade Tank Connections Sealed, how N Tank/Riser Covers Sealed, how Line drawn from Tanks to 100' or < Pumper access???? Y Outlet Effluent Filter? Y Q Type _ MOUND AT DE: ,Pda % Scarification Method: Percent SI Dike W idth up down side Clean Ro ? Y/ N Depth Below Pipe inches Clean S d? I N Depth Upslope " Downslope " Inches t Mottling Pipe Size/Spacing Perf SizelSpacing Finaf Cover Depth " Rock Bed Size Supplier: Sand Base Size Supplier: Upslope needing drainage/diversion? Y/N Provided? Y/N Grading done: Rough/Final Seeding / sod to be done by: T- 12.1 `? L „?..IGS ? ?8Q / 7z Z ? 9Q? 2tt- 3 RESERVE AREA?&Y N Fenced Off? Y Owner informed to preserve the Reserve Area Y / N Own copy of Septic System Owner Guide? Y/ N TRENCHE BED OR GRAVELLESS DRAINF;tplastfic:) Drop boxes level? N Type's?t concrete Trench Depth 2-1 `i Width G` Number of Trenches' -?_Trench Bottom Leve Y N Trench Lengths '' 1' Spacing 2" Rock over Pip-64.450 N Ge67extile Rock Cover? Y N Dmfld Rock Cleano N Depth Below Pipe?6_ or Size & Manufac. of Gravelless Pipe Actual / Expected Depth of Backfill ? Absorption Area: Sq F>201-_Lineal F ISY Munsell Soil Color at Trench Bottom 3 Trench Bottom to mottling / bedrock? i ches PUMP I F. iquid Tank Capacity Tank Ma facturer new / existing No. & i t of Risers Sealed? Y/ N Pump an . & Model No. Horsepower GPM Feet of Head Cycles Per Day Gallons Per Cycle Size of Discharge Line 1.5" / 2" Type of Electrical Hookup post & box by tank Alarm Location garage / basement Afarm: Tank Alert / Level A{arm / Other Cycle Counter & Water Meter (Commercial) I hereby certify, as the installer, that this individual sewage I treatment system was installed in accordance with the Designated Registered Professional Onsite approved design, and as applicable, this unicipality's ?/ X Sewage Treatment Syste rdinance PCA Lic. No.."Comp. Name ??- ? Installer's Signature Ph 4s/K63-,?7Y3Y Address?&0???V5y- A2?kp-?.5-?ZY "This As-Built Drawing & easurements are legible, & accurately locate all system components for later relocation(?P/ N Inspector's Signature a Approved: 19; /No Conditions: White copV: Countv ? Yellow: Owner Pink: lnstaller o:lforms\walm\ists\as-built-form.doc GWP-30 ? . 1 of Ea?an June 4, 2007 Mike Maguire MAYOR Mr. Darold Holden 4232 Blackhawk Road Paul Bakken Eagan, MN 55122 Peggy Carlson Cyndee Fields RE: City Project 719, Blackhawk & Diffley Intersection Improvements Meg Tilley COUNClL MEMBERS Dear Mr. Holden: Thomas Hedges Per your request in our telephone conversations of May 31, a copy of the May CITY ADMINISTRATOR 8, 2007, letter regarding potential future access to your property generally located at the southeast corner of Blackhawk Road and Diffley Road (CSAH 30) is enclosed. I also wanted to take this opportunity to reiterate and clarify that specific comments and determinations of future access along Blackhawk Road can only occur in response to a development application submitted to the City of MUNICIPAL CENTER Eagan. The attached letter incorporates several assumptions, some of which 3830 Pilot Knob Road may not be applicable depending on a specific development proposal. Eagan, MN 55122-1810 Furthermore, the conclusions reached in the attached letter may be 651.675.5000 phone misinterpreted or misunderstood to prohibit access from one or several of your 651.675.5012 fax parcel(s). At the present time, I am not aware of any access restrictions 651.454.8535 TDD recorded against your property. To avoid future misunderstandings, misinterpretations and/or confusion related to speculative developments opportunities, further discussions related to possible access points should only MAINTENANCE FACILITY be in response to a development application submitted to the City. 3501 Coachman Point I look forward continuing to work towards a mutually beneficial easement Eagan, MN 55122 agreement. Feel free to contact me if you have any questions or need 651.675.5300 phone additional information. 651.675.5360 fax 651.454.8535 TDD Sincerely, www.cityofeagan.com Tim Plath Transportation Engineer THE LONE OAK TREE Enclosure The symbol of strength and growth in our community. c: Denita Wesley, Dalcota County Russ Matthys, City of Eagan City of Eapn May 8, 2007 Mike Maguire MAYOR Mr. and Mrs. Darold Holden Paul Bakken 4230 Blackhawk Road Eagan MN 55122-2209 Peggy Carlson Cyndee Fields Re: Future Access to Blackhawk Road Meg l'iiiey CaUNCIL MEMBERS Dear W. and Mrs. Holden: Per your request, this letter is written to provide a summary of our previous conversations related Thomas Hedges to future access to Blackhawk Road from the parcels (PIN's 10-02900-010-05, 10-02900-030-05, CITY ADMINISTRATOR 10-02900-040-05, 10-02900-060-05, and 10-02900-070-05) which you currently own at the southeast corner of Diffley Road (CSAH 30) and Blackhawk Road. In these conversations, we have discussed the potential future development of your parcels based on the assumption that the development would be in accordance with the current Land Use Plan designation for these parcels of Mediuxn Density Residential (MD) and zoning designation of Residential Townhouse (R-3). We also spoke about the need to provide a general site plan that MUNICIPAL CENTER incorporated all of the parcels in the future plan for development. It is important to note that 3830 Pilot Knob Road phased development of your parcels is possible due to your ability to include terms into the sale Eagan, MN 55122-1810 documents which would provide access between all parcels. 651.675.5000 phone Additionally, we have spoken about the potential location of future access to Blackhawk Road. 651.675.5012 fax Currently, all of your parcels are served via single access located approximately 300 feet south of 651.454.8535 TDD Diffley Road. I stated that future access should be no further north than the existing driveway location. You have indicated that in a previous conversation with City staff you were told that future access to your parcels should align with Southpointe Terrace on the west side of MAINTENANCE FACIUTY Blaclchawk Road. 3501 Coachman Point After our conversations, I discussed the location of future access to these parcels with other Eagan, MN 55122 members of the City's Planning and Engineer Departments. The consensus amongst these staff 651.675.5300 phone lnembers is that the actual location of future access to Blackhawk Road will be determined in 651.675.5360 fax accordance with the City's subdivision ordinances at the time a formal development proposal is 8535 TDD 454 651 submitted. Without a formal development proposal, which would contain a general site plan, it . . would not be appropriate to identify an exact location for future access beyond the indication that it should be no further north than the current access location. www.cityofeagan.com Sincerel , Tim Plath Transportation Engineer THE LONE OAK TREE c: Ms. Denita Wesley, Dakota County Transportation Department The symbol of parcel File strength and growth in our community. G:Project and Conh-act Infol0719/Holden 050807 City of Ea?an May 8, 2007 Mike Maguire MAYOR Mr. and Mrs. Darold Holden Paul Bakken 4230 Blackhawk Road Eagan MN 55122-2209 Peggy Carlson Cyndee Fields Re: Future Access to Blackhawk Road Meg Tilley COUNCIL MEMBERS Dear Mr. and Mrs. Holden: Per your request, this letter is written to provide a summary of our previous conversations related Thomas Hedges to future access to Blackhawk Road from the parcels (PIN's 10-02900-010-05, 10-02900-030-051 CITY ADMINISTRATOR 10-02900-040-05, 10-02900-060-05, and 10-02900-070-05) which you currently own at the southeast corner of Diffley Road (CSAH 30) and Blackhawk Road. In these conversations, we have discussed the potential future development of your parcels based on the assumption that the development would be in accordance with the current Land Use Plan designation for these parcels of Medium Density Residential (MD) and zoning designation of Residential Townhouse (R-3). We also spoke about the need to provide a general site plan that MUNICIPAL CENTER incorporated all of the parcels in the future plan for development. It is important to note that 3830 Pilot Knob Road phased development of your parcels is possible due to your ability to include terms into the sale Eagan, MN 55122-1810 documents which would provide access between all parcels. 651.675.5000 phone Additionally, we have spoken about the potential location of future access to Blackhawk Road. 651.675.5012 fax Currently, all of your parcels are served via single access located approximately 300 feet south of 651.454.8535 TDD Diffley Road. I stated that future access should be no further north than the existing driveway location. You have indicated that in a previous conversation with City staff you were told that future access to your parcels should align with Southpointe Terrace on the west side of MAINTENANCE FACILITY B1aCIC113WIC ROSd. 3501 Coachman Point After our conversations, I discussed the location of future access to these parcels with other Eagan, MN 55122 members of the City's Planning and Engineer Departments. The consensus amongst these staff 651.675.5300 phone lnembers is that the actual location of future access to Blackhawk Road will be determined in 651.675.5360 fax accordance with the City's subdivision ordinances at the time a formal development proposal is 651.454.8535 TDD submitted. Without a formal development proposal, which would contain a general site plan, it would not be appropriate to identify an exact location for future access beyond the indication that it should be no further north than the current access location. www.cityofeagan.com Sincerely, Tim Plath Transportation Engineer THE LONE QAK TREE c: Ms. Denita Wesley, Dakota County Transportation Department The symbol of parcel File strength and growth in our community. G:Project and Contract Info/0719/Holden 050807 City of Ea?an Mike Maguire MaroR Paul Bakken Peggy Carison Cyndee Fields Meg Tilley COUNCIL MEMBERS Thomas Hedges CITY ADMINISTRATOR MUNICIPAL CENTER 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55122-1810 651.675,5000 phone 651.675.5012fax 651.454.8535 TDD MAINTENANCE FACILITY 3501 Coachman Point Eagan, MN 55122 651.675.5300 phone 651.675.5360 fax 651.454.8535 TDD www.cityofeagan.com THE LONE OAK TREE The symbol of strength and growth in our community. June 6, 2007 Mr. Darold Holden 4232 Blackhawk Road Eagan MN 55122 Re: Requests for Information Dear Mr. Holden, The City of Eagan Engineering Deparhnent has received several requests from you to research city records since Thursday, May 31, 2007. Following is a summary of the requests and the results of our research: 1. Right of Entrv Agreement related to City Proiect 317 - Blackhawk Road/35E. Unable to locate agreement in City files. 2. Citv Council Minutes Aertainin2 to the previouslv mentioned Riaht-of-Entrv A2reement or Proiect 317. City Council minutes from 1983 and 1984 were reviewed. Minutes related to Project 317 are enclosed for your reference. 3. Final Assessment Public HearinZ Minutes of February 5, 1985 where Proiect 317 was discussed. Enclosed. 4. Record of $5 000 check issued to Mr. Holden in 1983. In accordance with Minnesota Statutes, accounts payable and ciry-praject related inforniation is retained for 10 years. Thus, records of such a payment were not located. As you are aware, the requested records are from 1983. Significant resources and staff time have been used to research the requested City records as they are not readily available. In order to better accommodate any future requests for City records, please submit specific requests in writing to the City Clerlc, City of Eagan, 3830 Pilot Knob Road, Eagan, MN 55122. We continue to look forward to a mutually beneficial easement agreement. Sincerely, Tim Plath. P.E., PTOE Transportation Engineer Enclosures Denita Wesley, Dakota County ? 00111 0 _2 0 Councii Minutes January 18, 1983 CONSSNT gGEHDA The following consent agenda items were recommended for approval: 1. MSA Street Construction Program. The Engineerang Division prepared a projeeted 5-year expenditure of MSAS funds with annual allotments of $425,000.00 per year for the 5-year period. The City wculd not be rela to an antieipated time table for construetion and the Couneil will retain some flexibility in revising the list. It was recommended that the Council aoprove the proposed 5-year MSA street construction program. 2. Project 0317 - Blackhawk Road Feasibility Report. In November of 1982, MnDOT awarded a Contract for construction of the interchange of I-35E with Cliff Road and also construction of the Blacichawk Road hridge aver I-35E. The Feasibility report for Project #317 consisting of streets and utilities, south of County Road #30 on Blackhawk Road, has now been completed. It was understood that the Engineering Department will attempt to move the right-of- way of Blackhawk Road as far west as possible under Project #317 to minimize the impact on the existing homes. It was recom mended that the report be accepted and that a publie hearing be seheduled for Mareh 1, 19$3 at 7:00 p.m. at the City Hall. 3. Project #354 - Trunk Storm Sewer - Blaekhawk Raad. It was recom- m ended that the Feasibility Report that has now been prepared for Project #354 eonsisting of trunk storm sewer improvements on I-35E and Blackhawk Road be accepted and approved by the Couneil and that a public hearing be scheduled for March l, 1983 at 7:00 p.m, at City Hall. 4. Project #355 - South Blackhawk Road, Surfacing. With the improve- ments to Blackhawk Road on Projects #317 and #354 and the anticipated designa- tion of Blackhawk Road as a detour for County Road #30 during construction of County Road #30 interchange with I-35E during 1984, a Feasibility Report has naw been prepared and it was recommended that the Report be aecepted covering Pro ject #355 and that a hearing on the report be scheduled at the Eagan City Hall on March l, 1983 to begin at 7:00 p.m. 5. Project #367 - South Rahn Raad - Sidewalk. It was recommended that a sidewalk be constructed along the north side of Cliff Road between Blackhawk Road and Rahn Road as a part of the I-35E/C1ifF Road interchange. A Feasi- bility Report has now been prepared by the Consulting Engineer and it was recom mended that his report be aceepted and approved and that the public hearing on the report be scheduled befare the City Council at City Hall on February 15, 1983 commeneing at 7:00 p.m. 6. Project #370 _ Streets and Utilities - Dakota County Plat #1. The Preliminary Report covering Project #370 regarding feasibility report for Dakota County P1at #1, streets and utilities has now been completed and it was recommended that the report be aceepted and approved and the public hearing be seheduled for Fehruary 15, 19$3 at the Eagan City Hall to begin at 7:00 p.m. Upon motion by Wachter, seconded Egan, it was resolved that the foregoing Consent Agenda items be approved and ordered implemented by the City staff. 911 voted in favor. 2 ?.t?.(043 Council Minutes March 1, 1983 PROJFGT #342 - CEDAR GROVE STREETS Mike Forester appeared with a Petition signed by approximately 100 persons requesting the Council resurface the streets in Cedar Grove Addition under Project #342 and that the Gouneil not take bids on the installatian of concrete curb and gutter. He stated 17 persons declined to sign and 14 stated they preferred curb and gutter in his survey. No action was taken. POBLIC HEARINGS PROJECTS 1355, #317, and #354 The Mayor convened the public hearings regarding Projects #355, Blackhawk Road Surfacing south of I-35E, Project #3I7, Blackhawk Road Streets and Utilities north of proposed I-35E, and Project #354, Blackhawk Road Trunk Storm Sewer at I-35E. Mr. Colbert and Mr. Rosene explained the pro jects in detail. It was noted that the MnDOT Park and Ride facility along the west side of the south end of Blackhawk Road would not be assessed for the street imgrovements, in that MnDOT has decided that it will not aceept assessments for the improvements. The improvements would then be required to be paid from the City's major street fund. A number of affected property owners were present, some of whom objected to portions of the project. Tom Klein asked if grading and gravel base had been assessed and asked questions about the assessments. He was told that the grading and gravel base had been assessed on the southerly portion of Blackhawk Road and the proposal now is to complete the improvements ineluding curb, gutter and surfacing. The construetion is being built to 9-ton capacity because of anticipated heavy traffic. There were also coneerns about need for traffie signals at Cliff and Blaekhawk Road and also at County Road #30 and Blaekhawk Road, but no signals are being planned at Cliff and Blackhawk Road at the present time. There is a sidewalk plan on the west of Blackhawk to connect with the sidewalk across the I-35E Bridge. Dave Sellergren, attorney for Cliff Road Properties appeared and submitted a written statement and also detailed some objections that Cliff Road Propertieshad to the proposed assessments. He stated that on-site pands cauld possibly handle the run-off and that the purpose for the storm sewer construetion is solely for I-35E. He stated Pitt Lake is proposed to be raised about 4 feet and it may infringe on some of the proposed development area. He furthPr stated there is no assessment proposed for City park land within the highline easement and requested that that area also be assessed. It was noted, however, that this is an area assessment at standard assessment rates for storm sewer purposes. He also questioned the sizing of the pipe and suggested that additional comments from Cliff Road Properties be allowed during the development process. He stated that there is no immediate plan for development of the Cliff Road site and that much of the proposal is not needed for that property at the present time. He stated under Praject #317 there was cancern about the site of the propased easement for sanitary sewer and asked 3 OC044 Council Minutes Mareh 1, 1983 that the layout be reviewed with the staff. He indicated that it is not expected that the revenue from the development would justify the amount of assessments and therePore suggested several methods of relieving the assess- ment burden on the developer. There were numerous questions fr.om couneil- members and Couneilman Wachter objected to MnDOT not paying for its share of the cost alang the south portion of Blaekhawk Road, adjacent to the Park and Ride site. Egan then moved, Smith seconded the motion to elose the hearing regarding Pro ject #355, to approve the pro ject, t.o order in the pro jeet and authorize the preparation of plans and specifications. All voted in favor except Wachter who abstained. Smith then moved, Thomas seconded the motian to elose the hearing concerning Project #317, to order in the pro,jeet and autho- rize the City Engineer to prepare the plans and specifications for the projeet. All voted yes. Egan then moved, Wachter seeonded the motion to elose the hearing concerning Project #354, to order in the pro,ject and autho- rize the preparatian af plans and specifieations for Project #354. All voted in favor. LSXINGTON AVENIIE - PROJECT #330 STREETS & STORM SEfiER IlMPR0YENIENTS The next publie hearing canvened by Mayor Blomquist covered Project #330 consisting of streets and storm sewer improvements on Lexington Avenue from Cliff Road to Diffley Road. It was noted that a Petition had been reeeived from the developer of the Lexington South PUD for improvement of Lexington Avenue and the City had entered into agreements with the developer and Dakota County for the ultimate upgrading of the road. The developer has dedicated the right-of-way and performed all necessary rough-grading prior to any eon- struction by the County. It is understood that the County now has funds set aside for finaneing the improvements during 1983. There were no appearanees by the developer but a letter from Rod Hardy of Sienna Corporation.requesting special consideration concerning the length of the assessment spread and the amount of the assessments,. in light of the fact that the developers dedicated all necessary right-of-way and performed substantial quantities of rough- grading, at no cost to the City or County, was revieWed. Mr. Rosene presented the report and it was noted the project will be a County Road praject. The City's portion would cover the utility improvements and 45% of the cost of upgrading the street. There were eoncerns by the Gouncil that the Contraet not be awarded until the issue with the developer is resolved. There were no objections to the project. Smith moved, Wachter seeonded the motion to close the hearing, and to order in the project and authorize the plans and specifi- cations with the understanding that the Contract will not be awar.ded until an understanding has been reached coneerning assessments against the adjoining property. All voted in favor. 4 Council Minutes April 19, 1983 BLACRHAWd RQAD EASENENTS 4-1 ` ? e ? ?? ?. City Public Works Director Colbe-rt explained to the Council the problems that are being encounLered with the acqusition of necessary easements ior the improvement of Blackhawk Road between I-35E and Diffley Road. He noted thaL the grade of proposed Blackhawk Road will affect the driveways and lots of several single family residential property owners and that in light of the amount oi the assessments being proposed to be levied against several of the properties, he expects that it will be necessay to com men¢e condemnation of the acquisition of tne necessary right-of-way. Councilmembers recommended that the staff and Public Works Committee members Wachter and Thomas meet with property owners on Blackhawk Road on Tuesday, April 26, 1983 at 6:30 p.m. at the police building to discuss various alternatives for the alignment of Blackhawk Road. Upon motion by Egan, seconded Smith, iti was resolved that the City Council be on record recommending further negotiations with the property owners for the acquisition of the righ'u-of-way and in the event that it becomes necessary to do so, that the staff be directed and authorized to commence necessary condemnation for the aequisition of the right-of-way for Blackhawk Road and further, that the stafi be authorized to acquire an appraiser for the road right-of-way acquisition. A11 members voted yes. CfiECKI.IST Upon motion by Thomas, seconded Egan, it was resolved that the following Checklistsbe approved, dated: March 31 and Apri1 19, 1983 Al1 vated yea. ADJf3URNME.'BTT Upon moLion made and seconded, the meeting ad journed at 11:40 p.m. All voted in favor. PHH ? Q"y1 D), 74al City 1 rk . ' 12 bDE.Obf-?;C 1Z8FI.•d.S . LG-ai ?OM tr7d.. ..? ? ' . . . . .. . . .. . •53T1Tn v]5N1tl1%3 311q( '713 09'93) 133j 0 .. . . 1 NMOHS $3DNY1510 O ,I9 09 ? ,? ? ' ?311! SYN '-? lw`?^"11'+99<w°aW "' i u?+?ys?hy al11tl?; A83N3H L ?^?? ?"? W W'1T9d?C """ 4N114 PRIND A1N(f0J i0 37Ii10 M/d'1W&? 1"A IKi o u ? 2998LS 'Ox •700 _ MW ' ? ?- ' e ? iy?aoy ? -- ? ?,?+ +nw+ss ? +?wi N?m .rt ++?G Mft RRrB SlQ6NAS ltlN0I1N3hN03 I Al8 I1-I 510i 16z 0356/ 13N1/ 13 33j,98-I-ZI ZO'0 !b'I BZ 3354/1 MNb/IMN SfiWIIIM 'W StlWOHl HSa , NOIlIQOV 4aIH1 NbVd odVl17N1 9 6Z 8 BZ SN011335 NI 0M ?0 1H916 i 6Z 03S b/!MN4/SMN ? 333?99-I-ZI? LO'0 ?£b'0I5Z 035b/t3N4/13N - AING '3 03a3ltl 9S6 r BZ ?3SblIMNhfIMN ? 33? 98-1-ZI 9I'0 68'8 6Z 33Sb/i3Nb/13N A1d0 '3 12338O8 390 6Z 9 BZ SNOII03S A7M j0 1H918 33.j 19'0 4/I3NY/iMN N30-10H '7 0706VO f5b 33-? :I'bZ i7/1 3N NOSNHOP 'W Sh19Co0 4Sb 33-? b9-9Z-S ZO'0 bL'D b/I3N6/iMN N30l0H '1 0l06d0 oSb 33j 98-I-ZI b6'0 2S'Z b1I3Nh/iMN 'OJ lI0 03CRtl BSb 33J E0'0 b/[3Nb/IMN d3A3W31N 3317tl VSti 333 9S'0 b/I3Nb/SRN 110A '-l AH10t00 Sh 33? I 4Z'0 $!?3NbltM$ NHd?+ 213W13 3Ob 33d 10'0 b/I3Nb/IMS NHyd 83k13 OOb 33J d6'I b/S3Nb/IMS H3IN830N 3Ntl20 BOb i b/IMNb/I3S 33J 9 8 - I - Z I dl'0 Z6'EZ b/I3Nb/1MS 531183d021d Otl021 d-?Ilo 04 ii?? M0S3tl1d%3 lN3135Y3 lSS3l YO 3tl00 53 r??13 ,xansra OR3tl 1nWtliL a+iaure tlJ1 ?e xi ?? v?,in,un S.M8qq1 NOI17?O1 83NM0 1308tld 6Z N011335 NI AtlM j0 1N91a ?o pwc ica w ?eo a++?e ?ws a.aPa d3Nd03 b!I 1V NOri N081 1SVO '0O b'lONtlO ? ! I I 8?6Z ? ww?Ww.wiq?-- ww rwwW!n-Ww / ' Nwm?4??lMAN-- Pw95MVa'M? - +°wm P-7P4stl ? . Ns.?,.iraw?.awu.?+w?Aw.Wwd+..,wraraNa- Wwi / + ao w a ?m am a-Pro k ? ? ww r8-? 0 ' a? ? .a•a?vr??o? w wAme nl / •n ?.a w aa? ?w w r+r+?c o. t tAw Nwm+e ?,Srw F+e w mam ? ' . uR'S ? i ?F blpJt ?.Va52 ?!?4i5 9R91 -MV9 Z6i MAS ? P - ?- M?v!'mM?'+?Wa0.PWk?Pa+95>Rp-i ? NNd+S;-iP."dktl 9 A No1WI1Wa,vstaWPGuR? wukP?w..I??RTRRRWMWI w??l P?°.^w+W awKb M tl p.4-G ?V w ? tt y-Cr-t ? -?-1P--o N6tl I ? e ? _ y n UW ?VC+?IF4??RI I I L ? t $ n m u N a ?? o "`ti1o0i4"A 6£-61 ltlld { /i MN' f i MN Lf£S9 ?--wm .Mwa . V V I , 7?41 p?RI w!P?I W+PO ?Y?R7 j 7qC j ? m mt-10-04461 pwtw.atmt m ? zp" ?91 ? s961 .1% ,m..n "-??M ? 1- z RP-W??L93P?Pl?- - WV^ 3EH1YRPMFMpV wPAW?4?4?WW?u+1NYW"bM1 lYPV6MRkP?YqM?nuv{M v 'm? wrosTwro p eL ¢ a? v+onU ac a+xrxitw xrnt :o rAUr.m ? I D ?o ??u?a ,a, s wia? ?o t?wrm au - v ^ ^ ^ '+ .... 83NH00 6/I 1Y 'NQV bA1 O n:+ m ?,:" ??' I p? NOtli 1StlJ 'OJ tl19AV0 Z i I . -' - 3r+n moe NO IB-IF68 ? ? ?'? •S m - oo ` ?2 0 . .. . _ ? osi Sb 13987d 09a? .Sr •? m 54 137tlYd1 Sb S1 .._...._. ._... .._...._._.. ..... ... . .. . i 1.-",SOZ ? ,CC ? . Y5'9581-" "? fiY C1 692 - ?'m B2'J35 3N11 H1l41M , . . . ---- . w 6Y ?Y 611 ?59'SZI )8 OF 6Z'03$ -tlm 3N ? atos3NNiw 'AirrnoO dioHVa 'M El'a "N LZ'1 '8Z N0I133S 30 H31aVf10 1S3MH12i0N 3Hl NI oNV ''M £Z'2} 'N iZ'1 '6Z NOll33S A0 31q'H HlaON 3HL NI , b46(062•3921861 'ON 133PObd 31d1S 62-61 'oN sd-ld zVM Ja 1HO18 NOIldlKdSNd8l J0 1N3Wl6dd3a dlOS3NNIW t I5'916 8 25,Y5,0 P SIB-60C2A 21 0V632 ??t6'B98 60[26-OICS9 kSi U/?69L ?EZ'929 OiGE9•f18 'fF [1?61I ?[2'186 YIB-tl9 "ci,ss'sez'oo-sss cie-zie ecco'cu'at•eu eie•iie ;'il'l£ ?ZNY Qb 6f ILZM .OL'iC 7 6i'tC{I N„[1 1(IOC ti8-OIB 9Z Bd ZfZ ZF'ifF OIB-bB ?C2 90:69t :511Z1 68-98 ?Sb 7llY 91 St j 122Y0 ,SS'!bY J IS'856 Y?LO,fh9ZV 98•18 f1 ti 661 19'LC !8•98 I GZ?LI'[FS ?SB•991 98-59 ? '8S,0I,!%'09'89L IE-IA I i VI Bf btl fil'86 IB-If6B .6% C1?6P ZB'!9! iC6A-6d3i ?FY iSbY ?13'OL£2 623N-OC69 ' ?CY 'i51 Ot6A-£2B ?.r C1?69Z ?OS'1SF 628?YSB xCZ OF'?OZL '?59'6E1 o2B-128 'ca ioai ir:e aze-9ze a3Nyp3 y/ 1 ir Non ?ZCC> fF'I51 sze-sza I qpyI 1SV7 '07 YIDSIYO ,"co,ao'zi 'oo ssi sze-Vze ?M IC12 9L'!SC IZ8•f2B "'?So?•s? 'vrttz txe•tze =L co;cz ;oo•an zze•iza Sc to esz oo•sc iza-oze 8 l ?9t f0?B2 9C'C[L OZB-61B ? ?nI DY?6Y ?09'905 61B-B18 - ?SI YF?tSC 06'e61 BIB-116 ,:C'G54 7tl1' QS 6i,9i ZC7 ,9Y'6157 :I,OS.69E f6'15B N 1E621LP tlP-91B ?y?qZl I --l\ 51 f0 SC ??SS'f0E 918-SIA J \ ?"6I JtlY DI K)t 21'J £L'SI a NdOd3 = 0 b/13N-b!131 S < t,/13N-tr/I3N! 3NIl A1tl3dOtld N07 o??*Ar.@ ,p u / b v 18 ? 351 133BYd I t ? E n,? 6 _? v 5 a o 19 ? ? _•_ ?? M II . VI-.01 /L Y? 6Z ' Gti'v ?Ilc+ . tl3142I00 6/ t lY 'NOYY 6Z ? NO!]I 1StlO 'OJ tl10NY0 iti-si md ^x oV iseare !0 30MY7YB `,bd Ib-61 tY'Yd SNIOCOY ' N 60SZB 01 OISLB ZI,OYp69 p e i SL'S 6L / S I o? M/H ar+n rii u3AA-isr3 0? "bY 0b SIB, st x#} ,OC ID1'tl/d ) 3•1 m ? n 1 r 0/? a o 918 ? o £ • 60BZBC 'OM '?Op ?--?q ? •N,SStl I ' f $ k13kOd 'd007 Ol ' 'f ? •35r3 ' .os -f? -L l13NN0O b/I lY - 06 13321tld N081 157D '07 YlONYO ? b/13N-b/!MS f = ? Vl/ it?iN -t,/ 13 S oa, - ?0/ gpY 11B ? . m 604 T3?NYd or eo? 3nn ?? OOb l3?dV / ua3doad rm eo> ? 0° . 30t 1332?Jd 61e - •o?' 056 130tltld aS ° OSb l3JHYd 40 ? St I o 059 l3?tlq ? 119 ? ( 13Nt1 as+ dOtld NO lOW tSB ?p6 456 l30tlVd ; 6L NDI1J35 3NI1 HLtlON OS/ =?-- i ase '?e ip\ , F.. ? '? ?jj ZZB m ? d ^v° >?i ?rg C', b/!3N-tr/IMN DI 1k1 10 i I -?- ? --- - -<<e•?a••a•n•ee•?m J? ? i 3s113 1i.vin •aooa ; ]IU10313 '09 YlONYO OL ? ?•?D T `, I (80Yyt'd_'3'1? s4 rori?6 __f m kV aBSY 13387d ' OY-61 lYld SNIOfp' - .? 1 M i£69 01 OCW ?b5'688959 • A 69'096012Z • X °l z6 ' °?-- • ?-p? - rr•wW n +.. ? w w ? o tirwswas na.w,s.a . l aMoi Ninos •?ooa 3NVld 31Y15 'NNIW w.Su 'tl03 '03S lY 'NOW wdrevc??+ro?arauunww?rsKwwt NOtlI 1SY3 'OJ p10:1Y0 . Y I'0 ?'°.Pm ro+u+uu ae q?ql?w - . . • a??viw?w+aw? nv?wWnvawew-1 Kwwwa . . Uknmxu uvre a3Nil03 6/ t 17 'NOY! NOeI 1SYo '07 YlO)ltlO ?y . - A 9 6Z n a ? ? OY oZ ? ? r? esa Sb ,,3?dVd '?F "' „FY,SS,68 _/ iO ,ZS'1LZ 0 aoa m m3 ur ae m o 9169666'0 4 aaV 1M *4V- k NN . . ?wW+e+e?e.ww?w?a.w,a.a....wv'm "1lUlWOdlW4?0?N?0 .roa va ?s+a+?o ?.ws ro.anv a ar?w o*ttu? ra Nossqm cii,iO cw NULYIKMD HL-wev , . F a . .: ? SPECIAL ASSESSMENT SEARCH SUMMARY - PROPERTP_ID._ 10=02900-020.-OS AS OF: 11/25/1997 # ASSESSMENT DESCRIPT. YEAR TM RATE TOTAL ANN.PRIN. PAYOFF CD 1 04 SAN SEW TRK 0000 01 0.0000 900.00 900.00 0.00 TF 100343 WATER AREA 1976 15 8.0000 2920.00 194.66 0.00 TF 100929 SSTRK317 1984 15 10.5000 5337.75 0.00 0.00 TF 102103 ST 372 1991 15 11.0000 67279.80 4485.32 40367.88 TF ------ SUM4ARY OF LEVIED 76437.55 5035.83 (4 67.88 \ ****** 1997 P&I CERTIFIED 10022.64 ------ SUMMARY OF DEFERRED 0.00 ------ SUMMARY OF CLOSED 0.00 ------ PENDING ESTIMATE 0.00 Press ENTER; or F1, F4, F5, F7, F8 Lz?y 6 a(a?? z a 7? ?4 X?? ?_']'L ?-' ??2 ? ? 2 a? rd ? ? (0/ Qq - '71 9 L ?--/ ? ?, ? .Q jCP ?Q r.o ? Y GO/V G?? 14 ?7 O'11 // /?/ ? ?,?G1, fjjry ro?v?.?s ? ? 5 J -b-r r.t. ( oy ?v c/ ? fcxfC yro +' ? " ` ? Lt?hL/l_ Cit 7Y ?. o??? T hi f??? O cJ ?l..e-r? l..<?p r4c ?,o- ?? ? ? ? r Cy / /'? kt(.C./'i,h S ?n ? ? .l GC t v r b?>? LK-'d aJJ.tfJWlln f 7J /'?%?/?/??Q ?a ?d aN Qf1?t11A,11?n ? th" rO.ip Gfl?? T /??? !'??lL/ ?? ? it y V!.?P' •