The URL can be used to link to this page

863 Lakewood Hills Rd - Septic Design " , , � � l�'��J . SITE EVA�LT.,TATIC�I� Sf.��., 13C)12ING� �'E�C. T�ST Al�Ti7r I�E�IGN �o�.: ' . �� ,. �3- ,��-��`��.� � �� .� �. �- SITE: �� . - - ..�-L��,,,, 7" � -1=��S � �� BY: J�R�Y� SAUBER � m�rcA# 9�s #3i� Office (651} 463-7434 Home (65I.� 463-�55� , ' � , I�NIVERSITY pSTP Prelimina Evatuation Form . OF IVIINNESOTA � -.�1� t.Gontact Information v05.t3.t4 Property OwneNClienC�n�► Ctienf Phone N�snber: 657 269 52 91 � AAailing Address �3 Wkewo�Hitt Road Eagan AAn. Project fD: �- � Site Address �e I.egal DescripHon Par�eliD: tatitude�--� Langitude� � Evatuatiai for system type ❑t�ew Consavction �+Re�nent pa� 8 30 2044�� 2. Ftow Informatfion tlient-Provided I�formation Type(s}of use(al!tfiat app(y) �� ❑Cam�.cia� ❑Qtner(Spevtv) No.of bedrooms'{if�iicable) 2 sized for 3 Unflnished space (ti�) � No.of residents in home ❑Aduiis ❑Children ❑Teenagers Existing flow meawrements ❑ves�f ves.�rma��s1 ❑r� O carb�a�oisvosa� ❑wa�r sotte�°° ❑U«i f� � Water-usfng devices(check a!!that ��W� ❑��ro* Other{speciJy) �-�� YI ❑La�ge BatlKUb/]acv� �Nigh EificiencY Fmnacx* � . ❑wun�y/wrge Tub ai ma Flwr Q Ha Tub� � "Clear water sa�rce Water use ca�cems(check a(t tlwt p Fau�/r�t�a p atum�e t�ads o�uu�rvluer ❑t�ns 7e�m w�;oo r� ❑u�of am-�i s� ��y1 �s�-rw�e�+� ❑ra u�s«�, ❑F�u�t Enterta'udng tS Outof-Tam GUe95 My additional arrent or Euture uses on this parcet(specify} no Any non-xwwage dixharges to system (�ecify) no SewaBe ejector or grtnder pump in home? ❑res �wo 1 acknowFedge the above is careptete and accurate (Gltent(s)signoture m�d dnte) Designer-determined Ftow Information A.Estimatc�l Desfign Flow(galtons per day) 450 � Anticipated waste strength values: 0�� ❑tayh stren9n� BOD:� mglL CBOD:�mgll (n51:�mg/L 0£tG:�mglt 3. Pre(iminary Site Information B(1).Water wpp{y well(s)within 1Q0 ft of absorptlon area []ves �t�o Wet!(sj were(ocated �+p;�pry�„��, ❑��h wep y�p� ❑�ai C�w,�, FMl Unique Welt M#: �� Depth of wett(s) >50 ft Wetl casin8 dePthlS)� , ft Source� Imperviau layer �No ❑ves �f Yes,Define&Source: Required Sethattc: >5p ft B(2).Site with3n 2�R of no�community transient supply weti ❑ves �rro 5o��te�� B(3).Site within a drinking water wpply management area ❑Y� �t�o �� 8{4).Lowtion of all eacisting and p�oposed buitdi�gs and improvements on tot(see Site Evoluatiai m�) B(5).Buried water wpply pipes within 50 ft of proposetl system 0 vcs �� C.totation of all easements on lot(see 53te Evvluation mcg�) ��e D.Elevation of wdinary high water levei(OWHI}-MN DHR(if adjacent to parcel) � E.Floodplafn designation and flood efevallon 5��e � F.Determine property ttnes(see Site Exatuotion m�) ❑Swvey 0�t Map ❑py�; Site laated in a shoreland district/area ❑Yg �� G.Distance of setbacks ❑�r�s �aiwt_ ❑water Suppiy� ❑Otlier BuMdirgs ❑Ea�ents ❑we,R(s) � 3. IJl�IIVERSTTY � , oF Mrrrrr�so�a OSTP Pretiminary Evaivation Form �� H.Soil Survey Information(frorn web soil survey) ��v Map U�its af Parcet 895C List la�forms see attached Stope Range see attad�ed -� Parent materials-check all that�!y La�fwm Position{check nli that q�[y) a,� o�, ❑� ❑�� ❑� ❑� ❑� a� ❑� o� o�, ❑� o�: ❑�� a� a�� o� aT�� Minimum bedrock depth:❑inches Minimum bedraic deptfi:❑inches Maximum bedrak depth:�;�� Maximum bedrock depth:❑iruhes Septic Tank Absorption Fietd-Trencfi(6M!)see attached AAap Unit Ratir�gs Septic Tank Absorption Fietd-At-grade(MW) Septic Tartk Absorptiar F3etd-Mound(MN) 4. Preliminary Soit ProNle Informatlo�(f�om web soil wrvey-trp Enter information here or atWCh map and description. AAap Un9t see attached pther Depth Texture{s) Stnxture{s) Cortsistence Rest�id9ans Cdw Hwizon i Horizon 2 Horizon 3 Horizon 4 Horizon 5 Map Unit p�h� Depth Texture(s) Stnxture(s} Ca�sistence Restrfctlons Cdar H�iZOn 1 Haizat 2 Nwiz�3 Horizon 4 Harizai 5 Map Urt[ Otlier Depth Texture(s) Structure(s) Consistence Restr�tionS Color Hortzon 1 Horizon 2 Horizai 3 Horizon 4 Horizon 5 Map Unit Other Depth Texture(s) Structure(s) Consistence Restrictia�s Cdor Haizon 1 Haiza�2 Horiza�3 Horiz�4 Horimn 5 5. Local Government Unft I�formaHon Name of�GU LGU Castact LGU-spedfic setbacks LGU-specific desfgn requirements LGU-specific insWtlation requirements i hereby certify that 1 have canpleted this wwic in accordante witli at1 appti�b(e ordinances,rules and iaws. (Designc�r) (Signature) (License t� (Date) Web Soil �urvey rage t or 4 ��4��'�� Gt k�� ;�. � � I�^� Cankact Us i Suhstribe� '; Archived SaiiSurveys ` SoiiSurvey Status ': Glossary ,' Preferences ' Link ; togont ' 6{eRp A";A=�. Area of Interest Sai! Soil Data Dawnload Shopping (AOI) iHap Explorer Soils Data Cart(Free) �m�e�v�� naai�s��gc�l C� p � �Search 5oi!N4a � � `��:..� � �� s�i$ . �,.-..;n � �sap�n�t�.e�ena � Dakota County,Minnesota(MN037) � _ _ _ Map Map Unit Name Acres Percent Uoit in of AOI Symboi AOI 895C Kingsiey-Mahtomedi-Spencer 4S 65.0% complex,8 to 25 percent stopes 896E Kingsiey-Mahtomedi complex, 1.3 19,3% 15 to 25 perceni siopes 1824 Quam silt loam,ponded 0.4 S.6�u W Water _ _0.7 10.1;6 Totals for Area of Interest 7A 100.0% A' . ��; � ..>. ,,..,, ,,.�<,.:.. ...��.., ��.. "N: �Warning;Soil Map may nat 6e vatid at this scale. '�� You have zoomed in beyond the scale at which the soil map for this area is intended to be used.Mapping oP soiis is done at a paKicular scate.The soit surveys that comprise yoor AOI were mapped at 1:15,80Q.The design of map � �nits and the level of detail shown in the resuiting soit map are dependent on that ; map scale. Eniargement of maps beyond tfie scale of mapping can cause mtsunderstanding of the detail of mapping arxi accuracy of sofi line placement.'Fhe maps do not Show the small areas of contrasting so�is that could have been shown at a more ` detailed scale. FOIA � Accessibility Statement i P�vacy Poiicy � Non-Discriminatian Statement i InformaGon Quality i USA.gov � White House http:/Iwebsoilsurvey.nres.usda..govlapp/WebSoilSurvey.aspx 8!3 U2014 Map Unit Description:Kingskey-Mahtomedi-Spen�r complex,8 to 15 percent siopes--Dakota Cou�rty,Minnesota Qakota Counfiy, Minnesota 895C--Kingsley-Mahtomedi-Spencer comptex,8 to 15 percent siopes Map Unit Setting Nafional map unit syrnbo% fbOb Elevation: 670 to 1,950 feet Mean annual precipitation: 23 to 35 inches Mean annual air femperature: 43 to 50 degrees� Frost-free period: 155 to 200 days Farmland classification: Farmland of statewide importance Map Unit Composition Kingsley and similar soils: 45 percent Mahtomedi and similar soi/s: 23 percent Spencer and similar so�ls 22 percent Minor components: 10 percent Estimates are based on observations,descrip#ions, and transects of the mapunit Descnption of Kingsley Setting Lantiform: Moraines Landform pvsi#ion(twro-dimensional): Backslope Down-slope shape: Linear Across-slope shape: l.inear Parent maferiaf: Til1 Typical profile A-0 to 8 inches: sandy loam E-8 fa 92 inehes: loamy sand Bt,Bw- 92 to 38 inches: sandy loam C-38 ta 60 inches: sandy loam Properties and qualities Slope: 8 to 15 percent Depth to restrictive€eafur�: More than 80 inches Naturai drainage class: Well drained Capacity af the most limiting layer fo transmit water{Ksaf): Moderately low to moderately high (0.14 to 0,57 inlhr) Depth to wafer tab/e: More than 80 inches Frequency of flooding: None ' Frequency of ponding: None Calcium carbonate, maximum ir�pro�le: 5 percent Avaitabte watersforage in profile: Moderate(about 8.4 inches) Interpretive groups Land capabi�ity c/ass�cation(i�rigated): None specified Land capability class�cation(nonirrigated): 3e Hydrotogic Soil Group: C U�.5,�D1� Naturel Resources Web Soi!Snrvey 8i3112414 Conservation Serv+ce National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 1 of 3 Map Unit Description:Kingsley-Mahtomedi-Spencer comple�c,8 to 15 percent sbpes—Dakota County,AAinnesota Description of Mahtomedi Setting Landform: Moraines Landform position(two-dimensionai): Backslope Down-siope shape: Linear Across-slope shape: Linear Parent materiaJ: Outwash Typical profile A-Q fo 5 inches: loamy sand Bw-5 to 35 inches: coarse sand C-35 to 60 inches: sand Properties and qualities S/ope: 8 to 15 percent t7epfh fo restrictive feature: Mo�e than 80 inches Natural drainage ctass: Excessivety drained Capacity of the most limifing laysr#o transmit water(Ksat): Nigh to very high(5.95 to 19.98 in/hr) aepth to water tabie: More than 80 inches Frequency of flooding: None Frequer+cy of ponding: None Cakium carbonate, maximum in profile: 15 percent Available waterstorage in profile: Low{about 4.1 inches) Interpretive groups Land capability class�cation(irrigated): None specified Land capability ciass�cafion(nonirrigated): 6s Hydrologic Soi/Grcjup: A Desc�iption of Spencer Setting Landform: Moraines Landform position(iwadimensional): Footsiope Down-s(ope shape: Concave Across-stope shape: Linear Parent materiaL Loess over tiH Typicai pra#ife A-D to 7 inches: siit loam E- 7 to ?3 inches: silt ioam Bt- 93 fo 35 inches: silt ioam Bw-35 ta 45 inches: silt loam 2C-45 to 60 inches: sandy loam Properties and qualities Slope: 8 ta 12 percent � Deprh to restricfive featurts: More than 80 inches IUatural dra+nage class: Moderatety weil drained Capacity of fhe mo.st/imifing layer to transmit water(Ksat): Moderatety low to high{0.14 to 1.98 inlhr) I)epth to water tabJe: About 30 inches usDn Naturat Resources Web Soi!Survey 813112 0 7 4 � Conservatian Se+vice National Cooperative Soi!Sunrey Page 2 of 3 , . Map Unit Description:Kingsley-Mahtomedi-Spencer complex,8 to 15 percent slopes--Dakota Counry,Minnesota Frequency of flooding: None I, Frequency of ponding: None Availabie waterstorage in profi/e: High(about 9.9 inches) lnterpretive groups Land capability ctass�cafion{irrigafed): None specified Land capability c/ass�cation(nonirrigated): 3e Hydro/ogic Soil Group: C Minor Components Kennebec Percent of map unif: 10 percent Data Source Information Soi{Survey Area �akota County, Minnesota Survey Area Data: Version 9, Dec 27,2013 u� Naturaf Resources Web Soil Survey 8l31@U14 Conservation Serv7ce Idational Goaperative Soit Suroey Page 3 of 3 Web S�il Survey Yage 1 ot 1 �� ` , " � � , . ,�� } �E' � ! �" ... n � _ -� � . c,so�a ' ' _ _ , ,. ,, . - ,di�1l�i�i�i�~`�'�r.n,..� .� . , � . �! � �,., �� x i 1 as�..•-w�..< <:..,,r.' J i�..s . F Coniact Us Subscrit�e ��rchived 5oii Surveys So'sl Survey Status Giossary Preferences i link Logout Help a f; �: Area of Interest Soil Soil Data Downioad Shopping (AOI) Mdp Explorer Soils Ddta Cart(Free) View Soil Information By Use: Au Uses Printabie version) Add to Shopping Cart` � Intro to SuitabiSi�'ses and Soil Properties and Ecoi�gi:al Site Soil Soils �imitations for Use Qualities Assessment Reports Y � Search Map—�eptiC Tank/ibsaPp?ion Fie9ti�—3'rench ((�1�) C� .� �� 4� � s��e n°� � C?) Suitabilities and Limitations RaiE:z�s �� ,.. _ �',�-' 7 1'' "�c . � � �,�� ' OPen All Close Ail {� , �'""�U �=, • �' "� �,��, a, 7�n,. C�� s ��",� Butiding Site Development •: ' �,n},'` . ��3.✓ � � � � k�, Construction Materials ��F� � � � � �� Disaster Recovery Planning �,t�t�� '� '` Land Classifications >>""�-� � �``,� ;,, � � Land Management f�°'�� f�'' ,. . , Military Operations f ,,.,_ , :��ti� �� ' � Recreational Development a '�°� � ' '� , �� «� �' ��':� � ,� 7��' Sanitary Facilities u��_`' � _ , _� �k�"�'� __ � Aquifer Assessment(MN) ,� ;�Warning:Soil Ratings Map may not be valid at this scale. J You have zoomed in beyond the scaie at which the soil map for this area is Daily Cover for Landfill intended to be used. Mapping of soils is done at a particular scale.The soll surveys that comprise your AOI were mapped at 1:15,800.The design of map units and the level of detail shown in the resulting soi�map are dependent on Sanitary Landfill(Area) that map scale. Eniargement of maps beyond the scale of mapping can cause misunderstanding of the detail of mapping and accuracy of soil line piacement.The maps do not Sanitary Landfill(Trench) show the small areas of contrasting soils that couid have been shown at a more detailed scale. Septage Application-Incorporation or Injection(MN) � Septage Application-SurFace(MN) '�ab[es—Septic 7ank A3�sorption Fie4ds—Trench {[�a6�}—Sumsnar��y 3�iap t7nit Septfc Tank Absorption Fieids Summary by Map Unit—Dakota County,Minnesota(MN037) Q Map Map unit name Rating Component Rating Acres Percent Septic Tank Absorption Fields—At-Grade(MN) unit name reasons in of AOI symbol (percent) (nume�ic AOI Septic Tank Absorption Fields—Mound(MN) values) 895C Kingsiey-Mahtomedi- Moderetely Kingsley Restricted 4.5 65.0% �e�atic��tk i��asorption ��ei�s—3:�nch (;�Y�; Spencer complex,8 to limited (45%) percolation 15 percent siopes {0.30) Ylew Descriptlon� Vtew Rating S�ope(0.09) Vtew Optipns @� 896E Kingsley-Mahtomedi Moderately Kingsley Slope(0.73) 1.3 19.3�0 Map (� complex,15 to 25 limited (60°!0) Restricted Table i� Percent slopes percolation {�Component Breakdown and (0.30) Rating Reasons Mahtomedi Slope(0.73) 0 i� Numeric Values �30�0 Excessive percolation Description of f� (0.11} Rating 1824 Quam silt loam,ponded Extremely Quam, Ponding 0.4 5.6% Rating Options ;�' limited ponded (1.00) 1� Detailed Descripdon (90%} Soil Advanced Optfons �O Saturdtion ci.00) http:l/websoilsurvey.nres.usda.gov/app/WebSoilSurvey.aspx 8131/2014 Web Soil Survey rage�o�� Vierv D�trip��t� Ytear Ratin9 RestriGted percotaGOn (0.30) Sewage Lagoons W water Not rated Water 0.7 10.1% (100%) Soit-Based Resfdential WaStewater Dtsposal Ratings �� 7otals for Area of interest 7A idOA% �� Vegetative Productivity �'abte—5ept9c Tank Absar�ae�4n�ieids—�'cea�cts{MiY)—�scmmary by�ating C�� vai�,a Waste Management �' Summary by Rating Value �� _ _ Water Management Rating Acres in AoI Percent of AOi Moderetely iimited_ 5.9 84.3% 6ttremely limited 0.4 _ 5.696' Nutl or Not Rated 0_7 10.1% Totais tor Area of Interesk 7.0 100.0% � Dessription-Septic Tank Aixsorptic�n F"selds—Tre�sch(P9�1) TrenCh septic tank absorpdon fieids are areas in which effluent from a sepCic tank is distributed into the soil tMrough perforated pipe.In th[s system the drain fleld is piaced in a trench and covered wlth soil mater�aL The ratings are based on the soil properties that affect absorption of the effluent,construCtion and maintenance of the system,and public health.Saturated hydraulic conduckivity(Ksat)is evaluated from a depth of 30 to 107 centimeters.Depth to saturation and depth to bedrock are evaluated from the su►face to a depth of 203 centimeters.The frequency of ponding and flooding aiso Is evaluated.Excessive s�ope may cause Iateral seepage and surfacing of the effluent in downslope areas. The ratings are both verbal and numericai.Rating ctass terms indfcate the extent to which the soiis are Iimtted by ait of the soii features that affect this use."Not limited" indicates that the soi{has features that are very favorabte for the specified use.Good , pertormance and very low maintenance can 6e expected."Siightiy limited"indicates that tfie soil has features that are favorable for the specified use. "Moderately limited" indicates that the soii has features that are maderatety favorable for the specifled use. The limitaaons can be overcome or minimized by speciai planning,design,ar instaliation.Good performance and moderate maintenance can be expected."Very limited"inditates that the soil has one or more features that are unfaaorable for the specified use.The limitations generaily cannot be overcome withput special design or expensive instaifation procedures."E3ctremely limited"indicates that the soii has one or more features that are very ur�favorabie for the specified use.The limitadons generaily cannot be overcome. Numerical raYings indicate the severity of individuai{imitatfons.The ratings are shown as decimai fractions ranging from 0.01 to 1.00.They indlcate gradadons between the point at which a so+i feature has the greatest negative impact on the use(1.00)and the point at which the soil feature is not a tim9tation(�.00). The components iisted for eacM map unit ln the accompanying Summary by P9ap Unit tabie in Web Soii Survey or the Aggregation Report in Soi!Data Viewer are determined by the ag9regation method chosen.An aggregated rating ciass is shawn for each map u�it.The components listed for each map unit are onty those that have the same�ating class as the one shown for the map unit.The pereent compositlon af each component in a particular map unit is given to help the user better understand the e�ctent ta which the rating appties to the map unit. Other componenCs wlth difFerent ratings may occur 1n each map unik The ratings for all components,regardless the aggregated rating of the map unit,can he viewed by generating the equivalent repart from the Soil Reports tab tn Web Soii 5urvey or from the Soil flata Mart site.Onsite irnest(gation may be needed to validate these inte retations and to confirm the identi of the saii on a iven site. � Ratin�tSp$'sons—Septie 7'aa�k BAfss�rg�tau�n Fields—3rench{iwtril) Aggregation Me#hod:Dom3nant Condltlon Componen#Percent Cutoff:No»e Specified Tie-break Rule:Hi her FOIA � Accessibility SYatement I Privacy Policy � Non-Discrimfnation Statement � Infbrmation Quality I USA.gov E White House http://websoilsurvey.nres.usda.gav/appiWebSoilSurvey.aspx 8l31i2414 Web Soil Survey Yage 1 ot 1 .0 '�.� ° � � �, � - ��f �i"'�`7- .. ;� .�.� 3� ,< • �, ;� o ,,.ir4. .."r"","�t!s*�'�r'H`w'!`-r.t#�'*+i�+ �� i � 1C � • j , . �oniact Us SubscriF;e �rchived 5oi1 Surveys Soi!Survey Status Glossary Preferences Lirtk LogouY Help b A �. Area of Interest Soil Soii Data Download Shopping (AOI) Map Expiorer Soils Data Cart(Free} View Soil Information By Use: All Uses artMabie version� Add to 5hopQiag Cart� (� Intro to Suitabflities and Sool Properties Ecologicai Site Soil Soils Limitations for Use and Qualities Assessment Reports � 0 Search Ma�—Aepth to�+tater'fatsle ^ �,"� `�`` �� '_!�_! ��'J � Scale� pp a�n �;,+ rre��aeriies and C,ivalities Ratings � �'r a � �.�;k F�, ; '��-,r�- �., a � Open All Close All (� � � � � � �ti.� �.r� k�-�� a. � :a'��er e"` '� F�7 � °�,� ,,:k ��'v t�}iJ � 4 '^,, 07�33 '��`" Soil Chemicai Properties � - �� ,��,r Soil Erosion Factors �� s ',�' r '< ��" '� d � s � Soil Physical Properties � � � � * �-:� � ��7��' �� `�' "r �� Soil Qualities and Features � �� `� Water Features �e�th ta 1�8atzr'�abie View Descriptlon! Vtew Rating �.� � ��. P �' � �� i ._ �� , . a �,� `r'�z +� ,�a . .�„ `'• ,� -r x.v . Vlew Options � ,�+,, ,� y� y �E , �, � ,� � _..;�� } �' �� {�Y�z Y '$.._�_ y A;� MapI� �.s_-�,,.�.-.�,�� .. o- , =°-_ � _ __ _ � rable f� � ,Warning:Soii Ratings Map may not be valid at this scale. � Desaiption of r You have zoomed in beyond the scale at which the soil map for this area is rtating intended to be used. Mapping of soils is done at a particular scale.The soil surveys that comprise your NOI were mapped at 1:15,80D.The design of map rtating options i- units and the ievel of detail shown in the resuiting soil map are dependent on I�� Detaiied Desoiption that map Scale. ndvanced options Enlargement of maps beyond the scale of mapping can cause misunderstanding (�� of the detail of mapping and accuracy of soil fine piacement.The maps do not show the small areas of contrasting so�is that could have been shown at a more nggreganon Method Dominant Component detailed scale. Camponent Percent � Cutoff Tabies—Depth Yo Water Tabie—Summary�y h#ap Unit Tie-break Rule ,� �pWer . Summary by Map Unit—Dakota County,Minnesota(MN037) (� ,Higher - Map unit Map unit oame Rating Acres in Percent mterpret Nuus as SYm�� (centimeters) AOI of AOI Zero Y� No 895C Kingsley-Mahtomedi-Spencer complex,8 >200 4.5 65.0% to 15 percent s�opes Beginning Month �anuary 896E Kingsley-Mahtomedi complex,15 to 25 >200 1.3 19.3% percent slopes Ending Month December 1824 Quam silt loam,ponded 0 0.4 5.69'0 View Desaiption( View Ratfng W Water >200 0.7 10.1% ToWis for Area of Interest 7.0 100.0% Flooding Freque�cy Ciass � [7escription —�epth fio 1Alater Tabie Ponding Frequency Class "Water table"refers to a saturated zone in the soil.It occurs during specified months. Estimates of the upper limit are based mainly on observations of the water table at selected sites and on evidence of a saturated zone, namely grayish colors (redoximorphic features)in the sofl.A saturated zone that lasts for less than a month is not considered a water table. This attribute is actuaily recorded as three separate values in the database.A low value and a high value indicate the range of this attribute for the soii component.A "representative"vaiue indicates the expected value of this attribute for the component. For this soil ro e onl the re resentative value is used. � http://websoilsurvey.nres.usda.gov/app/WebSoilSurvey.aspx 8/31/2014 V4�eb Soil Survey ra�e�c�l� � : Rating O�tiQns—Depth ta 1lNater Teble Oni#s of Measure:centimeters Aggregation Method:Dominant Component Cumponer►t Percent Cutoff:None Specified Tie-break Rale:Lower Interpret Nulis as Zera:No Beginning Month:)anuary Endin Month:December FOIA � Accessibility SLatement � Privacy Poiicy � Non-Discrimination Statement � information Quality � USA.gov � White House http:i/websoilsurvey.nres.usda.gov/app/WebSoilSurvey.aspx $/31/2014 UNiVER�ITY OF �VIINI�tESOTA QSTP Fietd Eva(uation Form -�.��`�.�' L Gontact fnformation Project ID: v 05.13.14 Property O+mer/C(ient Kevin Gohl Ctient Phone Number: 651 264 52 91 Address 863 lakewood hilt road eagam m�. Date 8 30 2014 Weather Conditions ctear 2. Utitity and Structure Information Utility Locations Identified ��+W�'��fl# 651 454�02 ❑1u�+vrivate utir�ties �— � Property Lines ❑��APP�by a'�m �—�Ciient's Approva((initial) �o��a n�t�n�a 0 Avpro�amace ❑Propgb lines SurveYed Locate and Verify(see Site Evnluation map) ❑Ex�stln9 Bu�idi�s �tmqove�n►s ❑Easements ❑Setbadcs 3. 5ite Information Pertent Slope 2 Stope Direction south Landscape Position backstope Stope Shape Linear Vegetation type(s} wooded Evidence of cut,fitt,compacted or disturbed areas �Y� �� Discuss the ftooding or run-pn potential of site Identify b�chmarks and elevations(Site Evatuatian Mep} Proposed soil treatment area adequately protected �v� ❑tdo 4. General Soits Information Original soits �Yg Owo Type of observation �� ❑sw�sorirg 0 ssaai� Number of soit observations � 2 Soi[observatio�s were conducted in the propased system tocaYion �res ❑rw A soit observation was made within the most timiting area of tne proposed system C7 Yes ❑tao Soit boring log forms completed and attached 0 Y� ❑No Percotation tests performed,fornts compteted and attached [�Yes �No 5. Phase I.Reporting Information 6epth to standing water na inches Mticipated tonstruction isst�s Flood etevation feet Depth to bedrock na inches Depth to periodicaUy saturated soit 49 inches Maximum depth of system 13 inches Ekevation at system boLtom feet Differences betweeh soii survey and fietd evat�tion Percotation rate 13.3 miNinch none Loading rate 0.78 gpd/ftZ Contourtoading rate iZ gpd/ft Site evatuation issues!comments sma(t tree and brush removat required i hereby certify that i have comp(eted this work in acmcdance with a(t appticable ordinances,rutes and laws. (Designer) (5ignature) (License#) {Date) ? n ' � � + 'j � O r�D � j � � � O 1 � 3- i ! 'fl � ,�.r uG O'- �p � � � � � � � a ' � i ° � � fQ °,.,.' � � � 7 � -� m a � � `" o ' i � i � � � o � � n � ►--� v+ �, � x � � � � 0 3 m Z Cr1 ,r�• --�------��---� N Q. � �, � m � ( j o j o � k � -� � a o m � � � � � � � � 1 � j � � � � � � � d a � � o, �- a t/� H � � � 1 � � � I � j � � = � �- = � Qy � • < c. o. a 3 � r�a � n N �H ''4 o � � --_--�-_ —I —�-- � � � g o � � j � � � ; � � -� � v o- 3 � < v ♦ 3 w w ? w ! w � o �D . m ' ae i � 1 � , � � � � a �' � � Q � � : 1 _� i � o Q , ;. , --�— � � cn � � ---�-� � rt � ( i I N � � , ! � � o o � o ' o � 3 v ��,, � � � � � -G -f -G �t � v �/� � � .'8 �J r'� .Z7 rr fy V+ � ! O n ` i � � � � w � O � ❑ � O� � � � � N � ❑ a O O � ' � � s es O o Q, --.___._J__—__—'_. .-. i _ � . c p � � ; � �_ I i � rt � m "� � � f� ' V ; � ; O � � � a � (D i i � � � rt � � � � /1� I � tD ,� � cD � v! ; 1 � i ; i fl � n � � ❑ w� w °_' � � o� i � i o � � �° � � � Q� rr� N � f f � N C 'a { ; � 7 f�'D e�. � � � •� I � 1 ; > �� {n � .. 3 �� I � ••�• Cj -_'-�-___ � � --i__�__--� � � a� � � � ' - �--3--l I � � � � o � � ^ � X ❑ � r. O a � � � ;,, �' `� 5 � � ;� ! � � � ; i a* I r i � N � �, 3 � � i , p. � N ! �� H � . i � V ro � � � ; � I � � �`� � �' �° t � w ' v, � � I m i„ � - � n � � � .� � � � p`� �� -r � v� D 'V Q G i � f � "-�' N� � a < V1 � _ �". _� _�.._ �..�_..��_ � m C N � . t�1 N T � .lA � � `h (1 vJ � te� } UQ I !t� � � V+ _" -O � N �sa � ,m � „c � c -o ..� ° �n � � � � E � 1 � � a+ � m �c p �- ❑ 1 ( 3' i � i �• l � r�p °* '� � : � m rn � � - --�----�— , rn � . , : < '° � ; � ' � � � s. " � I � � � � � � � � � � � ! � � � � � I � � �` i � � N . � � fD i � � 0 � W � C � � i � pp � .1� - --�-------_--�- ---r-_- �D Q �,,� �'i � � � � � . . O r" 3 1 � , + y0 p f" ( ry � � n ' �'Z' � �:. �. � � � � � � � r r 1 � � ' o�,,Qi i � a; � o ( � I fli � — � � � � � � v- � I ( ! rD � ( � � N n � � � I � � � i I � � � � � , p � C ari o O � � ' { � � d' O � tD� � � � 'O a' � W C' 'p 3 , � {` � y � cn fl.� v, , �, t � o� '� � �- ;� `�i or � ' � � � i � � 3 �v; X I � � ° I °� i � Z `-�° �„ � m � � i t j Q;. 3 C�r� � i , �; r�-�r n � � n� (.� � i � � o � _ -� � � a o 3 m �j i_ � r+ y } � O _ � —� / C �— � ; � � ( , � I p�i � ' � —i r O p �, � � I E r p. tG � o � � � i r � I ,�X.,. n � 1 � ( � i � � `� � n � � a �a. j � + � ,�.,. � i � ! � I � p � a+; -r,[ n � r�D �."h G � � � � m � �� ( � � a ; � �D o 3 �' � � � �.. ' � ` � �D f � n '�' � --� ;—a ��--#-----�---�----�----- o o �" � � { � � i � o a ___�_�__ � � -n o � O � � � � i �n ° I ' �w., i w , �w,, �w„ cm r°, � a � n�i � � un � � E � T, � cl@ ; �E 3@ �E � T. � �. r�r -i -,--�—;-� �-��l i I o � '-� O � ; ; 1 � � � � i � , .� ' ... � _. � �, � � � ,�' � ; ' ` ' � � { � � � � � � � �. � � w + � � ; � j � � � ? � ; � x � `� m Q , n .a. � .A { aa w � rt � � I � I � p � A j Ja 1 W � N O �k � � � f ^ � � � � �� i ' � f � ' � �I I � � � � Q E ( , � o g ❑ � , --t-_-�-- -,—> +—�-� -, = � � � � � ��j j I �D rn �. C� ^ � ! f � € i � ' � v � � f O � � ro � a. � ; � � rr � GTt ' r�i fp �^ � - . , ? '* -< i i i m � `� [�] 3 � �.. � ; ? ( i � � � � 1 { 0 '� ^ � � ❑ wo� 0 ; � i fl � C o� I I � o m a�i �° � � � � i I I , , � ! 1 � °' � � n � � r i ; : { � � � � ( I Y � � �, � � i �_ { ___� _: � o o � o o � ' �_�+_Ti � ��-,- � �- � _ � � � � j i ' o- � n i Q n � V1 � : o i I ; � � � � K , " � � o tc ' ' � f � � j { ?;. ! i Q g � °'- , i , , a in g � � I i I y � � � � � � (U I, ! � N � � � a � �__; ; , __�___ _ � -� � s ( � �i � � - � p � I ` I � � � ( 1 N j { ` � � 3 �- 1 N N � r, ; ! j ; � o l ; �' � � ° o � � � � o ; i V � � � � . V a- ro cn n �, i � � N � O ---�--; ; ;---- � -t- �' ' � � � � ' � -�-�^ � �, � � q i �I ? � � d � {{ i1 � i m � m � � � � o � � II I ! ! 1 � � N ❑ i � , � ff � '�Q 1 . .� W i Sb � N � � � ¢�j � Sn ` , � ( � 7 ; 7 7 � � f�B � � ! ��._ _'T`"" ; i � � . � � �� '-- � � � }�r � � p<j � I 1 � � i , � `,Y^ � � � i � m � �' o ��a�x i i i � � � � ni fl+ i c� o, Q- c � `�"�c, , ' N A .�r e.+. i ..+. e.+, N� n � ��n« € ( � i � � � �i1 N � N f6 C p ��; s � x -- � k-=----Z—�----- � '---'--' --�—_. N tn W °�' �� S -j--�- i I � � ( i � � O � �- n � i j . � i � j ; = ,,, 3 ` : ; � . � p r � � ' 1 1 ` � ' � y ; � �a �F � i i � . Cl m � � 1 � ? p ; � � � � O i -p -s 4 � i � N. + � � � ; r � � I � 3 =� . . �" � I � ? � � � �fi � � � �. � � � p� f�e+D C E � f � � j � � � I � � � � k ! I. � + � � � � i � �� . � l + i I � � '�� { � � OSTP Percolation Data Sheet ��IVERSITY OF MINNESOTA ;��-�> 1. Contact Information Project 1D: v Q5.13.14 Property t?wnertClient: Kevin Gohl Address: 863 Lakewood HiU Road Ea an Mn. nera erco at�on n ormat�on Diameter 6 in Date prepared andlar soaked:� _� Method af scratching sidewatt: Is pre-soak required*? [�*Not required in sandy saiis 5oak'�start time: r� Soak'`end hrs of soak � time: Method to maintain 12 in of water during soak erco at�on est ata Test hole: #1 Location: date reading taken: [� Elevation: Starting time: [� Depth�": 12 �inches Soil texture descri tion: Depth {in�—Soil 7exture—� '"' 12 inches�or mounds Ft ut-grades, ! 12 f sandy loam _ � depti�of absorption area for trenches& u � _. _ --------- � -�— � � s i-- �-- -----�--- -----� !_ __ ' --------- ---� I � `Start Readin� End Readin� f Perc rate I %Difference� pass Reading C Start Time � End Time � , (in) ; (in) ! (mpi) ' Last 3 Rates � � ' ; _ ; NA NA ,_ � _ � _. _ 2 � � � �- � NA ; NA -- ----�--_____—---�_------� -.. T�._ -- ------ -- ---- 3 � { �------ - _� _. _ { --; --- -, -- __ _ ��__ � ,--- - --- --�--- -__-�-_ _._-� _�_- , _ -;__ - --___ _ __ � � --, ; f : _ -----T--- - -- � --- _ ___� ___�_. �- - - -- - x --__I : ___---�-_.__ ___, - �-_--_- �-- -- 1 �-- -t � , —F-- _ _ — --�— -----�- � ---s--- ' -_-----�_ j } 1 Chosen Percotation Rate for Test Hole#1 13.3�mpi Additionat percotation test data may be inctuded on attached pa�es Design Percotation Rate(maximum af alt tests)= 13.30 rrtpi I hereby certify that I have compieted this work in accordance with afi applicable ordinances>rulss and laws. Dest ner Si nature License# Date �� OSTP Design Summary Worksheet URTIVERSITY [NinnesotaPollution OF�INNBSOTA �;,i�� Control Agency Property OwneNCNen#: Kevin Gohl psoject fD:�v 05.13.14 Site Address: 863 Lakewood Hitl Rd.Eagan Mn. Date: 8 30 2014 1. DESIGN FL4W AND TANKS A. Desig»Flow: 450 Gatlons Per Day(GPD) Note: The estimated desiqn ftaw is considered a peak ftow rcrte inctuding a safety Jactor.For torrg term performar►ce,the average B. Septic Tanks: daity ftow is recommended to be<60%of t6is vatue. Minimum Code Required Septic Tank Capacity: 100(1 Gattons,in �7anks or Compartrtients Recommended Septic Tank Capacity: '15� Gaitons,in �2�Tanks or CompaRments Effluent Screen:t__! Alarm:� C. Noldfng Tanks Only: Minimum Gode Required Capacity:�]Gallons,in ��Tanks Designer Recommended Capacity:�—��Gattons,in �Tanks Type of High Level Aiarm:r— ~� D. Pump Tonk i Capacity(Code Minimum): 10Q0 Gallons Pump Tank 2 Capacity{Gode Minimum): ��Gattarn Pump Tank 1 Capacity(Designer Rec): 10� Galtons Pump Tank 2 Capacity(t)esi$ner Rec}: ��Galtans pump 1 33.�GPM Totat Head 25.0 ft Pump 2�GPM Tota[Head ��ft Supply Fipe Dia. 2.Q0 in Dose Volume: 112.0 gat 5uppty Pipe Dia.C�in Dose Volume:�gat 2. SYS7EM TYPE O rrend, OO Rea O r�aH,d O nc-crade � O c�tv��sswi OO vressu�e oisma,cron-t.eve► O�reswre rnstr�natia,-u�k�l O aiv C3 Nub�n9 Tan�c ��r C� "��0°��9uired 8enchmark Etevatian: 100.—�ft Benchmark L�ation: grade @ LookouE elev. System Type Type o#Distribution Metiia: �Type I ❑Type II ❑Type I II ❑Type IV �TYPe V ❑��R0d` ❑Rey�d rreatm�t r�: rak 3. SITE fVALUATiON: A. Depth to L�miting Layer: 49 in 4.1 ft B. Measured La�d S[ope%: 1:�% C, Elevation of Limiting Layer:�— �� D. Soil Texture:� Sandy Loam—� E, Loc.of Restricfve Etevation:�— —� F. Soit Nyd,Loading Rate:�78 GPD/ftZ G. Minimum Required Separation; �6 in 3.0 ft H. Perc Rate: 13.3 MP! I, Code Maacimum Depth o#System: 13 in Comments: 12 bed depth 4. DES►GN SUMMARY Trench Design Summary Dispersal Area�ft� Sidewatt Depth�in Trench Width�ft Total Lineal Feet�ft Number of Trencfies�� Code Maximum Trench Depth�in Cantour Loading Rate�ft Designer's Max Trench DepthC�in Bed Design Summary Absorption Area 580 ft2 Depth of sidewatt S.Q in tode Maximum Bed Depth t3.4 in Bed Width 10 ft Sed Length 58.d ft Designefs Mau Bed Depth 12.0 in �;°� ��-�� OSTP Design Summary Worksheet �N�uERS�TY - Minnesota Poi[antian OF Ii$INNESOTA .��w Cm�trol/lgency Mound t?esign Summary Absorption Bed Area�ftZ �d Ler�gth��ft Bed Width��ft Absorption Width�ft Ctean Sand Lift�—_�ft Berm WidLh (0-t%)��ft Upslope Berm WidthUft Downstope Berm Width��ft Eodstope Berm Width��ft Tokat System Length�ft Total System Width��ft Gontour loadir�Rate��aUft At-Grade Design Summary Absorption Bed Width��ft AbsorPtion Bed Length[�ft System Neight�ft Contour Laading Rate�gaUft Upslope Berm Width��ft Downstope Berm Width��ft Endslope Berm Width��ft System Length��ft System WidthUft Levet Ft Equat Pressure Disttibution Summary No.of Perforated l.aterats�� Perforation Spacing�ft Perforation Diameter 3 Z in Laterat Diameter 1-5� in Min.Deliver�ed dotume 74 gat Maximum Detivered Votume t13 gal Non-Leve!and Unequat Preswre Dis#ribution Summary Elevation Pipe Yolume Pipe length Perforation Size (ft) Pipe Size(in} {gatlft) (ft) {in) Spacing(ft) Spacing(in) Laterai 1 Minimum Detivered Yotume Lateral 2 �� laterat 3 Laterat 4 Maximum Detivered Yotume Ldteral 5 ��a! Laterat 6 5, Additior�al Infa for Type tV/Pretrea#ment Design A. Calcu(ate the organic tvadirtg 1. Orgnnic Londing to PretreQtme�t Unit =Design F�ow X Estimated BOD in mgiL in the efftuent X 8.35=1,00O,OOU ��gpd X ��mg1l X 8.35=1,�O,OOD= ��tbs BODtday 2. Type of Pretreatment Unit Being Instatled: 3. Catcutate Soil Treatment System Orgartic Loading: BOD toncentrotion after pretreatment:Bottom Areo =tbs/day/ftZ �_�mg/L X 8.35=1,�0>0� _ �ft2= �ibsJday/ft2 CommentslSpecial Des9gn Considerations: t hereby certify that i have completed this work in accordance with al!appiicabte ordinances,rutes and taws. (Designerl t5ignature) {License#} (Date) : �� .:;�� OSTP Bed Design U�IV��si�� -, ��_. Minnesota Peilution WOI"�ICS�'1@et OF�IV�INNESOTA �� Control Agency t. SYSTEM StZtNG; Project ID: v 05.13.14 A. Desigp ftow(Design Sum.1A): 450 GPD B. Code Maximum Depth": 13 inches Designers Nla�cimum Depth: 12 inches C. Soil Loading Rate: OJ8 GpD/ftz D. Required Bottom Area: Design Ftow{LA)=Loading Rate(1.C)=lnitiat Required Bottom Area 45Q GPD= 0.78 GPDlftZ= 5n ft2 E. Setect Distribution Method: ❑Pressure �Grav�ty pressure F. Setect Dispersal Type: ❑ROCk ❑Registered rock G. tf distributian media is instatted in contact with sandy or toamy sand or with a percotation rate of 0.1 to 5 mpi indicate distribution or treatment method: Pressure distribution 2. BED CONFIGURATION: {for sites with tess than 6%siope) A. Select size Muttiplier: 1.0 1.Q=pressurized or 1.5=gravity B. Req'd Bottom Area=Bottom Area(1.D)X Size Multiplier= 577.0 �2 X 1.0 ft = 577 ft2 C. Designed Battom Area: 5Tl ft Optionat upsizing of bed erea D. Select Bed Width: 10 ft E. Calcutate Bed Length:Designed Bottom Area =Bed Width =Sed�ength 5TI ftZ-:- 10.0 ft= 57.7 ft 3. MATERIAL CALCUI.ATtON:ROCK A. If drainfietd rock is being used,select sidewatl absorption 8.0 inches = 0.67 ft B. Media Votume: (Media Depth +��pth to cover pipe)X Designed Bottom Area=ft3 { 0.7 ft+ �ft} X 571.0 ft2 = 385 ft3 C. Catcutate Volume in cubic yards:Media volume in cubic feet =27=cubit yards 385 ft3 : 27 = 14 yd3 4. MATERIAL CALCULAI'ION: REGISTERED PRODUCTS-CHAMBERS AMQ EZFLOW A. Registered Product: B. Component Length: ��ft C. Com�nent Width: �—�ft D. Camponent deptM(louver or depth of sidewatt loadin�) C�in D. Number of Components per Row=Bed Length divided by Component Length{Round up) � ft=. �� ft= �components E. Actual Bed Length=Number of Components X Component Length: ��components X ��ft = ��ft F. Number af Rows=Bed Width divided by Camponent Width r�� ft ' � ft - �� rows Adjust width sa tfiis is an whote number. G.Tota[Number of Components=Number of Components per Row X Number of Rows �� X �� _ �components � � OSTP Pressure Distribution - Minnesota P°Ilu#ian �e'S1 n Warksheet �TNIVERSITY n � Caritroi Agency � OF MINNESOTA ° ��..� Project ID: v 05.13.14 1. Media Bed Width: �� ft 2. Minimum Nurober of Latera[s in system/zone= Rounded up number of j(Media Bed Width -4) = 3] + 1. ( 10 •4 ) + 1 = ��^Jtaterats �oes not appty to at-grades 3. Designer Selected N�mber of Loterais: ��laterats Cannor be tess than tine 2 (accept in at-¢rodes) --��---�� ; �, ti` Y ,�:; 4. Setect Perforation Spacin�: 3.0 ft �� "' = °�< - �� •/."�erloranw�s spac..d 3'apas . 1 2'at ravt 12' " 5. Select Perforation Dinmeter 5ize: 7/32 in - 6 ��, ,� ppr(a��ian druJ.'ti to'J Mrtwa�ipi spatlny.2'm 3' 6. Length af l.aterats =Media Bed Length -2 Feet, 58 - 2ft = 56 ft Perforation can nor be ctoser then 1 foot from ed�e. � Determine the Number of Perforation Spaces. Divide the Len�th of L�tern(s by the PerforQtion Spacing and round down to tfie nearest whote number. Number of Perforation Spoces ��ft = �ft = 18 Spaces Plumber of Perforations per Laterat is equal to 1.0 plus the Number of Perfaration Spaces. Check tabte 8, below to verify the number of perforations per tatera!�uarantees less than a 10°6 discharge variation. The vatue is double with a center manifold, Perforations Per Laterat = 9 8 Spaces + 1 = 19 Perfs. Per Laterat t��oti�n��f i'�rfar�n�F�r L�ral to�ant��'�t'�i�arg�Ya� 3�Enc F �ra�s 71�2 lnth P�Ft�fi�s E�i�(13aas�eter�l�c�s) P�F��i� P'ipe ' �Ir�ct�� t��e�� t�e�t� � t� �� ` �� t� �� ' � �r; � �� ` �� t �� a �� s �� ' a� �� 's �� ; �� r��,��;� ��s�� Pi�e d;ame�er�t�s) F'��f�� E'i� ` tt�s� P�rf��+t�(��E} � ��# 1�a Z 3 �€eet) i t� 9#� 2 3 � 1Z ' 1$ �� ' � ' 87 2 :' Z� 33 a44 : 7�4 f#4. 2��i 92 17 2�€ 4€! ��! 2�t 2a 3Q 4i 69 935 � i� : '�6 22 3F ' 7� ` � 2fl � ' �6 b�4 �?� ; g• Totat Number of Perforations equats the Number of Perforations per Laterat muttiptied by the N�mber of Perforored LQterats. 99 Perf. Per Lat. X [_JNumber of Perf. Lat. = 57 Totat Number of Perf. 10. Select Type of Mar�ifatd Connection (End or Center); ❑End ❑center 11. Select Laterat QiQmeter(See 7abte): 1.'5Q in = �� n; OSTP Pressure Distribut�on � � ��5��n Des� n Worksheet U��vERS�� Y�z � : � Cor�#rol Agency � OF �INNESOTA `'�..� 92. Catculate the Squcrre Feet per Perforation. Recommended value is 4-1�ftZ per perforation. Does not upp(y to At•Grades a. 8ed Area = Bed Width (ft)X Sed Length (ft) 10 ft X 58 ft - 58Q ft2 b. Square Foot per Perforotion = Bed Area divided by the Totat Number of Perforations. 58Q #t2 . 57 perforations = 10.2 ft2/perforations '{3. Select Minimum Averege Hecrd: 1.0 ft 14. Select PerforQtion Discharge {GPM)based on Tabte: 0.5b GPM per Perforation 15. Determine required Ftow Rate by muttiplying the Tatat IVumber of Perfs. 6y the Perforation Diseharge. 57 Perfs X 0.56 GPM per Perforation = 33 GPM 1 b. Vo(ume of Liquid Per Foot of Distribution�ping (TQble l!): 0.11U Gattons/ft q7, Votume of L3istri6ution Piping = T�1�It _ [Num6er of Perforated Laterats X tength of Laterats X (Votume of �`af��'�-�4�� Liquid Per Foot of Distribution Piping] �� Pi[pe ' Liquid �� X 56 ft X 0.110 gailft = 18.5 Gattans E�iam�ter Per�oot {inch�s) (Gallons) 9 8. Minimum Delivered Volume=Volume of Distribution Piping X 4 � �•Q'�� 1.25 0.878 18.5 gats X 4 = 73.9 Gallons �t.5 0.1�t? 2 Q.17o man' pipe� 3 0.3$0 � 4 0.661 � - - --- � ,-c�eanouu -- - --_ _ i firom � _ P P� f�P ' % i Manffold pipe� lean outs � ,' � � � �ti �r � � ----- altemate location - � of i hom m �Ateemace bcation �P�Pe tram Pump Pi from Comments/Speciat Design Considerations � g� :�n� 4STF Basic Pump Selection Design �� _ - N�in�esata i�otiutia�e �OCk$1 IeQ� �NIVERSTTY �` � � zantrof Agency OF�INNESOTA " -��"`=�� 1. PUMP CAPACII'Y Project ID: Pumping to Gravity or Pressure Distribution: O Gramy OO Pressure Selection required 1. If pumping to gravity enter the galton per minute of the pump: �_�GPM (10-45 gpm) 2. If pumping to a pressurized distribution system: 33.0 GPM 3. Enter pump descrfiption• Demand Dasing Soit Treatment • � i veatmeoc ry�n .. 2. HEAD REQUIREMENTS &°�,ta�� A. Etevation Difference 15 ft ��` between pump and point of discharge: " � ,detaW� flevaaon:: m a�tt��e B. Distribution Head Loss: ��ft � . � .�'�'�" e�... C. Additionat Head Loss: ��ft(aueto�eciat equipmenz,ecc.> ----------°----------------- ----°-------• Table t.Frtction Loss in Plastic Pipe per 1t�t#fit" Distribution Head Loss pi e Diameter(inches) Gravity Distribution = Oft Flow Rate {GPM) 1 1.25 1.5 2 Pressure D�stribution based an Min�mum Average Head 10 4.1 3.1 1.3 0.3 Vatue an Pressure t?istributian Worksheet: �2 12.8 ` 4.3 1.8: 0.4 ' Minimum Avera e Hsad Distributivm Head Loss 14 17.0 5.7 2.4 0.6 1ft 5ft 16 2i.$ 7.3' 3.0 : 0.7 ; 2ft 6ft t g 9.i 3.8 0.9 5ft 4 t}ft 2Q t t.1 4.6 1.9 25 16.8 6.9 1.7 p. 1.Supply Pipe Diameter. 2.0 in 30 23.5 9.7 2.4 35 12.9 3Z 2.Supply Pipe Length: 140 fC 2}p 1b.5' 4.1 �. Friction Loss in Ptastic Pipe per 100ft from Table I: 45 20.5 5,0 50 6,1"` Fridion Loss= 2.83 ft per t00ft of pipe 55 7'3 60 S.b p, Determine Equimtent Pipe Length from pump d9scharge to soit dispersat area discharge 65 10.Q paint. Estimate by adding 25%to supply pi�tength for fitting toss. Supply Pipe tength �� ,g . (D.2) X 7.25=Equiwlent Pipe Lengrh 7g 13,0 14Q ft X 9.25 = 175.Q ft $� �6.� 95 20.1 G. Calcutate Suppty Friciion toss by muttiplying Friction Loss Per JOQft (L9ne f)by the Equ�vatent Pipe Length (Line F)and divide by 100. Suppty Friction Loss= 2.83 ft per 100ft X 175.0 ft = 100 = 5.Q €t H. Tota(Head requirement is the sum of the f(evntion Difference (Line A),the Distribution Head Loss(Line B},Additional Head loss(Line C),and the Suppty Friction Loss{Une G) 15.0 ft + 5.4 ft + ��ft + 5.0 ft =, 25.0 ft 3. PUMP SELECTION A pump must be selected ta deliver at teast 33,Q GPM{Line t or Line 2)with at teast 2�3.� feet ofi total head. Comments: � �� ` �STP Pump Tank � UrrivExsi�r � nninnesoxa�otmcion Design Worksheet OF MINNESOTA �5"`-� Corrtrol Agenq DETERMINf TANK CAPACtTY AND DIMENSIONS Project tD: v 05.13:14 1. A. Design Ftow(Design Sum,fA1: 4`� GPD B. Min.required pump tank capacity: 1� Gal C.Recommer�ded pump tank capacity: 1W0 Gal D. Pump tank dexriptioo: Demand to Pressure MEASURED TANK GAPAtITY{e�risting tanks}: 2. A. Rectang(e area=Length(L)X Wid#h{W) Width �ft X �� ft = �ftZ 8. Circle area=3.14r2(3.14 X radius X radius) 3.14 X �2 �t — ��fiz �----= length �, CaFwtate Galtons Per inch. Multipty the area from 1.A or LS, by 7.5 to determi�e the gaiton5 per foof the tank hdds a�divide by 12 to wlcutate the gattons per inch. �� ftZ X 7.5 gaUft� :12 in/ft = ��Gatlons per inch Radiu D. Catcutate Totat Tank Volem►e Depth frovn bottom of intet pipe to tank battom: �» Total Tonk Vo(ume=Qepth from bottom af in(et pipe (Line 4.A)X GalionsJlnch {Line 2} � in X 21.0 Gallons Per Mch= �Galions MANUFACTURER'S SPECIFIED TANK CAPACI7'Y(when available): 3. A. Tank Manufactarer. brn.Wibert Note:Design colcotatiorg are based an this specijic tank.Substituting a B. Tank Model• 10fM1p different lank modet witl change the pump f(oat or ttmer settiregs.Contact C. Capacity from manufacturer: 1008 Gatlons designer Ff changes are neces9ary. D. GaUons per inch from manufacturer: 21.0 Gattons per inch E. Liquid depth of tank from manufacturer: d8A fnches DETERMINE DOSING VOLUME 4• Gatcutate Votume to Cover Pump(The inlet of the pump must be at lea5t 4-inch�from the bottom of the pump tank 8 2 inches of water covering the pe�mp is recommended) {Pamp and btak height+2 inches)X Gallo�Per lnch (2C or 3E) (�� in + 2 inches) X 2t.0 Galtons Per loch = 105 Gaklons 5. Minimum Delivered Votume = 4 X Votume of Distribution Pipiog: -Ltne 17 of the Pressure Distribution or Line 11 of Non-{eye� 74 Gailons(minimum�se} 6. Catculate A�ximum Pumpaut Yolume (25%of Uesign Flow) Design Ftow: 450 GPD X 0.25 = 113 Galtoru(ma�cimum�} 7. Setect o pumpout votume thnt meets both Minimum and Maximum: 112 Gaila�s 8. Gatculate Doses P+er Day=Design Flow:Deiivered Vo(ume ��m��(��}j�j� 450 gpd: 112 g3l = �4�Dases �� 4. Catcutate Drainback: A. DiameEer oj Supp(y Pipe= �inches pIPC �:IC=U1t� Diameter' Per Foot B. Length of SuPP�Y�f�= 140 feet �it1C�S} �Gd��8i1S} G. Yolume of tiquid Per Linea!Foot of Pipe = 4.17Q Gdltonslft � Q.��5 D. Drain6ack=Length of Sup�sly Ptpe X Vnlume of liquJd Per Linea!Foot of P►pe �_� Q.07� 14Q ft X 0.170 gdUft = 23.$ GaUons 1,5 0.110 10. Total Dosing Votume=De(ivered'Yotume ptus Drain6ack 2 �.�?Q �u ga!+ Zs.s ga!_ �3e Gattons 3 0.3� t t.Minimum Alarm Volume=Depih of atarm(Z or 3 inches)X gatlons�r ioch of tank 4 O.�,� ��in X 21.0 gal/in = 42.0 Gatlons �. : `�� ' 4STP Pump Tank �� Minnesota Follution Desi Worksheet UIdIVERSITY conuo�ayeocy � OF MIN1�tE30TA �-```� TIMER or DFAhAND FLOAT SETTINGS Select Timer or Demand Dosi�: O rxner 0 o�ana oose A. Timer Settirrgs 12.Rec}uired F(ow Rnte: A. from Design(Line t2 of Pressure Disuibution or Line 10 of Non•Level*); !� GPM 'Note: T1�is mlue must B.Or catcutated:GPM=Change in Depth(in)x Galtons Per inch/Time Intervat in Minutes be adjusted�ter � in X � gatlin s �� min=� GPM insta[tatiar based on 13. Ftaw Rate from Line 12.A or f2.B abwe. � GpM Wmp cntibratfon. 14. Catatate TIAAER ON setting: Totot ilosing Vofume/GPM C� Qdl= �� $�Rt= ��Mittutes ON � 15.Calculate TIFAER OFF setting; Minutes Per Day(1940)IDoses Aer Day-Minutes On 1440 min .- ��doses/ddy - ��min = �MinutesOFF ib.Pump Off Ftoat-Measuring from bottom of tank; Distance to set Pump Off Ftoat=Go(lons to Cover Pump /Golions Per lnch: t__1 �at� � Satlin= ��inches i7. Alarm Float-Meawring from boitom of tank: Dtstance to set Atarm£foat=Tunk Depth(4A)X 90%of Tnnk Depth �� in X 0.90= �in B. DEMAND DOSf FIOAT 5E7T1NGS 18. Calcutate Fioot Sepnraiion Distonce using Dosing Volume. 7otat Dasfnq Volume/Gallons Per Inch 136 �dl : 21.4 gaUin= 6.5 Inthes 19. Meawring from bottan of tank: A. Distnnce to set Pamp Of f Ftoat=Pump+btak height+2 inches �� 1�+ � ln = ��Inches B. Distonce to set Pump On Ftoot=Qfistance to Set Pump•Off Flout +Ftont Separatfon Disfanre �� in+ 6.5 i11 = 11 Inches C. Drstance ta set Atarm F(oat=Distonce to set Pump-On Ftoat +,q(nrm peFth(2-3 inches) �� in+ 2.0 i1l= 13 lnches FIOAT SETTINGS DF�WND DOSiNG TIMED DOStNG Inches for pose: 6.5 in s--- Atarm Depth 13.5 in Atarm Depth in Pump On f 1.5 in 42�� Pump Off 5.0 �R 9 3b�� Pump Off �n 105 f�1 A I , � ��s��'� ,�{� Giort ��,n � z� �;� �°,,�-e�'' _ � / / � �< < �`�� -- � � � ` • � t' '" � � �'�� Z� � , � ' ' `�'' �^ � 2 �„ 3� ,� 3 � .� I2�� T�� -�IZ r��.s��. � � �- � � ' '� �t�SSv.rr �e � IO�KS�'8�— w�i`_`�f��.- �.�L. � '` ' t, �S �3�a+,� �,,�,�c/* - l/a ,�,��,�Ls w/j Z R.� �ytl j� / ��0'�GrSs W1�b� F ?'"�� `+ L . � 4 0 � �Y � � �` 44 �i �� . �`�� 't"+r� �^ � ��; �,� � +��I/ 0, .l,eje� � � V V `✓ �I,f�� . � �� `� �• � ' � � � .r �(' / .` '*` \ tif� ' I �,, i.l+ fi � �`� . � � ��" � � O � �� . �� /t i �� . � ��J' �' �� .�, �P � �'f yf ,� � a � � w � m �� " � -� v � � j, �.: �� `' � m� z ',� v' � - . �1 '�r �^ �� a , �"'� � � h �. �, � �� . F � � � � P �. � r � ;, � �� - o � �� { �\ � � \ � � '� � � �� _ � � a `� � Q � �� , a'... ` � � � - � z � o � ''� � � }� � � . � -� � c� �1 F r;��' o� �D �� 1 , � p '�� a_. _� �; � � � � � s ��' i � M � i � A' � � � �