Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
07/16/1991 - City Council Regular
■ 1 SAGENDA REGULAR MEETING M' EAGAN CITY COUNCIL EAGAN, MINNESOTA MUNICIPAL CENTER BUILDING JULY 16, 1991 6:30 P.M. I. 6:30 - ROLL CALL & PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE (BLUE) II. 6:35 - ADOPT AGENDA & APPROVAL OF MINUTES (BLUE) III. 6:45 - DEPARTMENT HEAD BUSINESS (BLUE) i9• IA. POLICE DEPARTMENT 1. Ordinance Amendment/Section 2.38, Issuance of Citations IV. 6:55 - CONSENT AGENDA (PINK) ', ?, A. PERSONNEL ITEMS kiB. PRELIMINARY COMMENTS on County 1992-1996 Capital Improvements Program C PROJECT 603, Resolution Restricting On-Street Parking (Wilderness Run Road) 1 ' D.. CONTRACT 91-07, Change Order #1 (1991 Sealcoating Program) R' ,,G) E. CONTRACT 89-03, Change Order #3 (Maintenance Facility Expansion) sr- F. PROJECT 615, Receive Feasibility Report/Order Public Hearing (Meadowview Road - , Streets & Utilities) 2� G. APPLICATION, Gambling License for Minnesota Valley Humane Society to Conduct Pull-Tab Q Operation at Durnings Restaurant, 4625 Nicols Road P,y-i H. FINAL PLAT, Sky View la I. FINAL PLAT, Willbrook Addition '3:5i J. FINAL PLAT, Oaks of Bridgewater 2nd Addition , • 7/ V. 7:00 - PUBLIC HEARINGS (SALMON) �'� A. PROJECT 601, Lexington Avenue/Lone Oak Road - Intersection Reconstruction & r Signalization 1› B. PROJECT 584 (Rahn Road) , Reconsideration of Final Assessment - Mount Calvary Lutheran Q' Church VI. OLD BUSINESS (ORCHID) "_ S `'� I'` (0 IT SPECIAL USE PERMIT, Steininger Construction, to Allow Continued Concrete Recycling in �,` a LI (Limited Industrial) Zoned District, Located West of Highway 149, South of Yankee Doodle Road in the NW 1/4 of Sec 13 90 B. DIRECTION Regarding Recreational Facility Committee Recommendation to Proceed with Ice Arena/Swimming Pool Project C. RENEWALS, 1991 Trailer Permits Qd41/' County Cost Participation and Traffic Signal Agreements, #26-16 and #91- �� D. PROJECT 601, 07, Respectively, Lexington & Lone Oak Road Intersection Reconstruction & Signalization ig.3 E. CONTRACT 91-04, Consideration of Contract Award (Oaks of Bridgewater 2nd Addition) r' F. CONTRACT 91-05, Consideration of Contract Award (Willbrook Addition) J {VII. NEW BUSINESS (TAN) • f' a 7A. INTERPRETATION of Similar Uses in a Light Industrial (LI) District 4�� B. SPECIAL PERMIT, Opus Corporation, to Allow a Business Identification Sign at Lot 6-13, reiq Block 5, Eagandale Center Industrial Park #3, Located Along the Southside of Lone Oak Road, West of Neil Armstrong Boulevard , l C. UPDATE on Metropolitan Council Review of Eagan Transportation Plan and Public � Utilities Plan Elements ,(O`lk D. AMENDMENT to the Eagan City Code, Chapter 6, Section 31, Regulation of Dance Halls ` t(MD VARIANCE, National Minerals Corporation, of 1.6% to the 35% Maximum Building Coverage Requirement, Located at 855 Apollo Road in the NE 1/4 of Sec 11 rI ( F. VARIANCE, David Perron, of Approximately 4' to the Required 30' Front Yard Setback, Located on Lot 16, Block 9, Cedar Grove #7 in the SE 1/4 of Sec 20 4 G. WAIVER OF PLAT, DCR Company, in Order to Split a Single Tax Parcel (#051-06) Located Along Beau D'Rue Drive in the NE 1/4 of Sec 19 L Ov T\'"£A t' H. PRELIMINARY PLAT, S Todd Rapp Addition/Middlemist Properties, Consisting of Four Single-Family Lots Within the Manor Lake Addition Located Along the West Side of Manor Lake in the NE 1/4 of Sec 36 �6 I. PRELIMINARY PLAT, Golden Meadow Addition/Todd, Mereness & Percy, Consisting of Three 1 Lots on Approximately 1.86 Acres of PD/R1 (Planned Development/Single Family) Zoned Land Located on the West Side of Dodd Road, North of Golden Meadow Road, in the NW 1/4 of Sec 25 VIII. ADDITIONAL ITEMS (GOLD) A. • IX. ADMINISTRATIVE AGENDA (GREEN) X. VISITORS TO BE HEARD (for those persons not on agenda) XI. ADJOURNMENT le. MEMO TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCILMEMBERS • FROM: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES DATE: JULY 12, 1991 SUBJECT: AGENDA INFORMATION FOR JULY 16, 1991 CITY COUNCIL MEETING ADOPT AGENDA/APPROVE MINUTES After approval is given to the July 16, 1991 City Council agenda and the regular minutes for the July 2, 1991 meeting, the following items are in order for consideration. DEPARTMENT HEAD BUSYNESS A. POLICE DEPARTMENT Item 1. Ordinance Amendment/Section 238, Issuance of Citations--Enclosed on page is an amended copy of City Code, Section 2.38 with respect to the issuance of citations. The purpose of this amendment is to add Community Service Officers to the list of individuals authorized to issue citations on behalf of the City. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny an amendment to the City Code, Section 2.38 with respect to the issuance of citations, to extend that authority to Community Service Officers. • ORDINANCE NO. 2ND SERIES • AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EAGAN, MINNESOTA, AMENDING EAGAN CODE CHAPTER TWO ENTITLED "ADMINISTRATION AND GENERAL GOVERNMENT" BY ADDING SECTION 2 . 38 , SUBD. 2 (I) , PROVIDING FOR THE CITY COUNCIL DESIGNATION OF EMPLOYEES AND OFFICERS AUTHORIZED TO ISSUE CITATIONS TO INCLUDE COMMUNITY SERVICE OFFICERS, AND BY ADOPTING, BY REFERENCE, EAGAN CITY CODE CHAPTER 1 AND SECTION 2 .99. The City Council of the City of Eagan does ordain: Section 1. Eagan City Code is hereby amended by adding to Chapter 2 , Subd. 2 , to read as follows: I. Community Service Officers. Section 2 . Eagan City Code Chapter 1 entitled "General Provisions and Definitions Applicable to the Entire City Code Including 'Penalty for Violation' " and Section 2 . 99, entitled "Violation a Misdemeanor" are hereby adopted in their entirety by reference as though repeated verbatim. Section 3 . Effective Date. This ordinance shall take effect upon its • adoption and publication according to law. ATTEST: CITY OF EAGAN City Council By: E. J. VanOverbeke By: Thomas A. Egan Its: Clerk Its: Mayor Date Ordinance Adopted: Date Ordinance Published in the Legal Newspaper: Agenda Information Memo • July 16, 1991 City Council Meeting !CONSENT AGENDA There are ten (10) items on the agenda referred to as Consent Items requiring one (1) motion by the City Council. If the City Council wishes to discuss any of the items in further detail, those items should be. removed from the Consent Agenda and placed under Additional Items unless the discussion required is brief. PERSONNEL ITEMS A. PERSONNEL ITEMS Item 1. Resignation/Assistant Utility Billing Clerk --Enda Asleson,Assistant Billing Clerk, has given the City notice of her resignation effective July 19, 1991. After review of this position with City Administrator Hedges and Finance Director VanOverbeke, it has been determined that this position is necessary to the successful operation of the Finance Department. • ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To accept the resignation of Enda Asleson, Assistant Billing Clerk, and authorize staff to proceed with hiring procedures to fill the position. Item 2. Part-Time Police Dispatcher-- Over 85 applications were received for this position. After screening of the applications, the more than 45 applicants who possessed the minimum requirements for the position were invited to the Eagan Municipal Center for testing. The top fourteen candidates were then invited for an interview. The interviews were conducted on Wednesday, July 10, 1991. The interview panel consisted of Administrative Lieutenant Swanson, Lead Dispatcher Bartel,and Assistant to the City Administrator Duffy. Reference and background checks are currently being performed on the number one applicant as unanimously selected by the interview panel. It is expected that these will be completed in time for the name of the successful candidate to be presented to the City Council with the administrative packet on Monday. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the hiring of the candidate to be named with the administrative packet for the position of Police Dispatcher, contingent upon successful completion of the City's physical examination requirements. • 3 Agenda Information Memo July 16, 1991 City Council Meeting • DAKOTA COUNTY CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM B. Preliminary Comments on County 1992 - 1996 Capital Improvements Program--Dakota County has requested preliminary comments as it begins preparation of its five year capital improvements program covering the years 1992 - 1996. These preliminary comments are intended to provide direction for County staff as they begin development of the CIP document which will also be returned to the communities for comment upon completion. The City Administrator requested that the Community Development Director,Public Works Director and Parks and Recreation Director review the existing County CIP and provide comments in this regard. The current CIP is enclosed on pages ,� through /(, for your review. Comments by the Public Works Director are enclosed on page /7 . The Parks and Recreation Director and Community Development Director indicated no specific comments to be added at this time. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve staff comments with respect to preliminary preparation of a 1992 - 1996 Dakota County Capital Improvements Program. • • II . I • R r ~ V � O O hV'k N 4,0.O. tt)P. 1 to rg to Owtoto it Hwy rtlNO dry } QO! MNtOO� ehC m O1� 03 M 0 r Owc'. rtto 1 ~ QlONO hM !Qf et co tp 4 r 'ij {f? `VAf ✓► i9 leo N N M p � d w d ,N w •; 1 a `� I in ' ' W �: NttDCi~ $ a^0 w a a r !"= 44 ' w Co 9 9, a w CO I 49 IM CC Lo :E <...: CL CO M OOOto1 g a o to o to m f S• 7O � O 1* a) on0H ;�. �; � co to o to• to ..1 I ww � LU K M I 0 < t- Z. w H /�v� „A.-o. , -cc t N ' OOSi h 7..0 tv 00000 1v.... ' L O to OOIOD r ) Q ph OO r { U , C 1._ ._ N KN� N � � h y r � � pp N t4 y 0 I I • Z i O OOi OM000 Ow N g � a to r � Mccoto Ig r c !-_ 1� en t0 r 44 (2 I 9 ict > 5 - 0 , >- ci IIC 4 3 't 2 0 icaamc ± mamcn I- 410 IftaimPrrvtwor.,,,, ,-- -...r...--w.Y•.y,.-,-•d...ti„-n r•nv alnv>•...- ...,...i•ww..-..i......w............ . ....-.._........._-._.._—______... 600 NO I ideLLS I N I WQti-A1Nf 10O 8.1.0> is 80:ST T 6/80/10 le § R § § § § § § rS § § § 1 § le • . " fRR 1 Hinli S i k 12 M P. 8.1Ug I O i!1 i . k & & Mk § M § § §§ § § 8.4 a a gi it irciiR a H • • q24 F V '►_ r . N N . . N r 6, J 7 44 g • ' W Q O p Z Z Z Z Z Z G t7 �tl C � © � � � � d NNtAW WNt/1 Al •• OW W WWWt1J bk O'M . .• 44 4Wvw O g5. 111151- C2 ! mx5g era O i . Vcc E n < x $ > J L• a � � • il t3F ; UYiiUEl < 4 < .« < 4 V 11) t/rixg n - U! Re, .17, � . 0r' ~ xxxx V 0at � O " II 0 000 „ � i cr 0 EM lEVEMIIIIEEE 1 r00 NOIltkLLSINIWQtt-AiNflOD t110t1tia (Q 60:Si I6430/22 @ § § § § § E @ § § Q h g Olgggg d gg 6 g 8 ur4 .03 01 • U r4 .. 2 i es w to • 000 00 O O 0 ui ooS o � § $ R § § § $. • ii pp tp f� K2 6 rig OW ii4 d • W ON is Q W § 1188 $ g9g § g § o0Q $ Q0 § s00 0. UE . 40 0 p 4, na :: 43 434449 r weri � esv, vi 0 N 49 N H 0 1 oggg � § § § § o gooe° 0000000, o g 0 o0000000e000 , g $$ c� o0 000a, Qo wnoo a p § tb 5 E § E § § § o 1 u� o eo .: l: ao �n n co tl eo p 1— 41 019 � � 0 I9 i0A01Ni 00N /NA0 W e919 m • I9 M • • •. a. —J • '.: 19 1 W 00 w 8 � � 00 • , 0 oc . - zzz - og gg - :; r C V CC GN A ~ N � CIC� 0 NDNQNMN CO ii ap 2220Ili. 4ILLZZO 0 0 0 N , i Egggr8 $ (- 4.444o .1cc » qiiwgq8q § $ $ • :, U u) COM '•I 1' � _ . N 8a PP` " as x 3 1 1 N U _ 2 J U• N V V t Q p J V c,"1 tot" 0 ¢ �" ° H 1 2N et i 1 1 w • cL 1 ZtA . 1 OW ^ V 0 = 8 = _ 40 = N 4,4 N w mZ O H o M- F. f. C V O t N Er co ..J i u. v ..,i 1 ehooN V ` - Nib t4 to, W � a g 5 h O I. •r4 •03 . . t `r C 0 LM g q=q =4N =gqvg2gq4NoNlm F v 11 O Q c� M f t/) CY) t!) tC to = Z ? e`) [A Ul Q N Ct Q N N 2 Q UVUt.� OUVUUU DO o 1 000000000 = - • 1 iiEREEl ill E Eci aaagazgaggz . .. ...-........ ... �., .r....r.r..,•••..:.�.n +..w+...rr•.n.o.ws'tiwa�w+rn+.\t.atvF.;..�.. rr,..\.,n.^yK`Y'w.e'f►eer+.r.,Kd.'M�w`•t'Y;l'�!E:� S00 NOI1tki1SINIWQti—AINf10O 010AdG 0T:ST T6B0/1,0 { .. ........ ....... ...,.........��.....,..............•.�:.�:...:uUfi„.aia...:aw........c..\U��.ai..u:A....cY::.U.....a...�._..w....w�.u......�.s...� �'"� `,,`hr ,,_ i & g § Vg § N T ag rt. • I• Ln ,• E5 i s Ln cc gm ... 44 4, R• 5. Ler g § ? ggz §. N iti R U � TCO � K � ��Npp 61• ' g § go g 2 .J i 1 r K K P M 44 w 44 .r 1 Ztn 11 , . O p Z 2 00 i e64ww < a i L � 2 ? w § § , Qi 0 25 pNQ [C ggJv W W 87 fi 4 a N » 1 i s i g E . PR sg q :• 2m5Mii gc g . . i 0 1 iggg g 124R4V il I 1 I - ggg5i p li 11 • t? . i . Vear2gIg ...1 cc miiir2 14c x 0 . 40 , . ue og § 0 i i g . T r 1 1 g ffEEEE�^ T F� r f+ T T r 900 ND 11tuLLS[N I WQti—AINnoci U.1.0 JQ 2 0 T:S T T6/80/2.0 .;J . Q ,0 }y N II IlEi J �� M N d . Q g a • ii � � � � � 1. 1 § ma 1 qi . ggg & g 0Agkg § km r .. 4 ti le ti f a . ; e§ ! HE g illig i ... . 4 i gh i .d , 2 tia 4.) f t Z _ j x g M / 5551 s j iiifi . , § . i . � X^ 8.. 8r 8.. y � 8 �8 � r r d Y 5381 ;11 d. ga 4 1 W hill MI 2 . gaga IwaAA Ag8C i g .)i .iit PPE tgP i $ . . A i ii R § i 5 14 . , .vim i! ,� lw pp1�� 1 1 1 iiw�i Y I h R N M 1 "; 1 ... V C)C) QUC) UUW b= zAtz 40 E � ;A /iii a iiEi hats fEtg 1 1 L00 NO 11ti2LLS I NI WQti-AIMCO 0.10> i i Y T T:ST T6/80/20 ,g, litil ,,, • li _ j - A .a t _ PI 4• 1 4.H 0 HI $ 4 o � Z " h a aom �I . gig RAH F.. §.§ / § 5E1 i gi{ i NHH ' h N N � .. I K i a s 5 5 1 Z 8 888 g ga& R a 2EgI F iii Nsa * • H w M ii I I I. • .i • iI . i, 61 (46 4 8g8 g FF .gw JD 0 ::: hi '§ • 1 1 • 1 i lin 'J} ell i J i . 1 icic24: Pil 152 . Ii U X , i IA4 tan Biz . i N khk • . INin ii = 131 I ME ' ill lig 800 NDI1tia1SINIWQti-A1.Nf100 tiiO iti I iT GT T6/80/20 i • 1 4' °� Q $ § i ° ° o0. § °s. go $§ s § § & 2N NN n Vl � N N N � 49Ni9 N a l 49 M a 49 Y! 49 2 44 a, S 0 • 1 y '.� I- La g I R $ a Q f Li rN4h 'tU2 4phCOco2NN rNMafPd) aNNt`4N 2 IL • - O 6� { ,. v 0 t C C C E C t' C ago E = CM Gds a °' o88mQ' o E•. ,,<.: lig:a O N O O 0 0 '3 ap op Y Si, S<Aoo . o c , :: ' /i A <8 1-,,E .8. a tii: 8 li Ag 1! ]i 'g li i; 2 $i i5 11 ig 15 t 10 12 12 A d V = ..1 ‘ i,.cci: IE 15 k 0. 15 c, 3 a. a! _.1 a. _§ &'S.' El5214 ,A! 1 i .14,•i!.'.• 2 t a t I I) 1 i ito itaall O. o E .. ... MCI; . ° Rirerac a aaa as 'a1 oo � � arc 800 � ; aaavib cc cc et' g' w= = was- ,!�` 14 rr_ � w oa �'11 li �5, 3'' 's 8 8 11 n cc U h- v,+ ,�a, 8 2 a too a cr F- Ct• 0 Sekttt & SSVA & S)) NNN 44 N01 NN01 csi Q7 • i 620 ND 11t ie LS I N I Wati-Mi fl00 tilOkkii \I\4 Z S S I 16/130/20 S S hg 12 2 0 8 8 c 6A co a Ito . 4. 1 12 1 1 1 2 6 Q r� oo • 00000 2, 0000 q ZS oo oo, 00, 0000, 00 0 § o$ 000 § St :E0) oo K.; u� ou� o +n o goQnoo �r2 Ou? N 1A h1t) N O 516. 00 tSj 1� r r� r N QI r m- N M O 0 N m- �l9 r O 1 Z 44 4.4 , is 44 `, 4 N M 69 44 49 49 49 - H M i4 40 c 14 vi p ' O I Iwo o § § g § g § § $ $ oE $ § § § § g § sQQ § § §§ g $ $ og' E • o 00g g 0 U) 00000 OOO U) OU) U) 00 p NOON00t6! �J Och QN � {nQ Q ONtt1h �ANNhOO C IdO1� hOQh g E.cc a. 44 �,. K W 4 49 4PHK4'! K4? 49 44 N f9HNN49N H 44), 44 49 13 r tu tci ^ NCO * WI4000ia NNN cgelsr A506AN $1 N 4VR» 5pO4ANNN . z I a 1 • E E E r E E EE " E c m e m c d m m m m m? 0 '- o1 3 - 20 - 00a0 fltIjjj. W Cic0CI "( CICii4( r C300 i i i is3O a : i I t i t 11 i i '1 L I . % % % .i i' -MCC 1 aa. a80 b � � aa .1 6o fld� — a Hotel 4 .. . . . , .. .... ... 0 0 0 liT2 % ; 12112.- L aog tEe ° - - 44f 1- crcrzt- x le 41/ 8 g2 Iall ligig ! r " ": cl ! 1 " 1 1. llfiihIHn11352 llhihIu i . co- a' E I ge* III i . 0, 01 01 01 CD CD 01 01 MIMI g CD 0 e . . • . : . 1 0 T 0 NOIltial.SINIW itI-M.4100 tlicodK 1 £T:ST T6iB0/L0 • § § 88888888888 888888 ° ° ' Opp ONat00 �! 00 000 � fON0 �0000y 0. • VU tOD lV Noi '- u, n Oa <C V ... ,- WWOONN Q �f 0 � i� c� CO r r r at • H3 a ~ r • • • . . pi R k p i Itli co i ;1 ii ;;-. § • • 1 N is N ilt:2 888 8iii § aRi" 45; "5 " a"$ � 8 $ $ � § 8 888 8 .' ei. ...ii:., O 8 88 !§ :. rW O Oh 1 Ei ate; ��• O 000000000 .. H ti g a s3 n ��rQQ n $ �p h 1� j 'a c �p g �j � r � r � N �f �0� � 1Ar � � RV � � � NCD 1 tt R- 01 a.1 scAt g * 1 RiEll 0 a v - a ell- PR� � g � i IR 8 g* '� a in " c OE oo 1 Cam � `� � 1 Ig.c talt ID- acc flxiArgwri 8 ' Ig . 2 c, 0 c, • g g lill e 8 ii Er ii 0 8 s 1! li 1 # Iiiiillkst $ OANhi - - itea .6 t4 t 5 ' � MO a hU : 111611 4U 1) _ 1 i�j Qr� E W I p1 Qs • IQs40fCOiQOitg sQse at r,s s4ssItsOit * s t1► p� OS � CDssmect 0 . • TTO NOI1tiLilSINIWQti-AiNrco eaccida 13 £T:ST T6480/ O 1 _ , 1E co s § s § § 2 § § § § § § P ii) § tit � 0� A il M a � p N �7 p �j Y O p o D 410 v.V 4 y 6 gj H al : i! j 11 � 888 B8 } t[1 OI pp t� 1A P N In 0 1� r N t0 N Al �'J 01 N _� of M N w N w -i(y. � . I 74 tg :i § E if § g 10i Ei g E § § § F. § § M § Fp li ii g BPS ^ IRbR � Ngl2 rtmc11.4. mto h �- � Of � atMNNN .* er r r r • d � N N ■ • •p p h y Pp p Qp t a 2 1 i i i EP f I P icl to U ae W t m a LI d c 1§ 5 If 1114110 i xPtif vwenigggEn K a - s oelLia. f g _Ne . smgclinits N 9 Fof t= O leS 6 C ° 8 m fA i y j m i .E10 EmE °- d ; W2 0 CL 2t 03 nc 3 a u+iiiiiiillillifv t.> o 01111Ill i zt of Ch SR C7UvJ xac11U000to ,- 1 CV CV CV 14 CM CM CV Cm Al CM CV clA C4 cm cm Wag2121S & Ri4t .TIRSESEgESEE gp vi CA w CO OP Cr/ 11111 • 1 .. ZT0 NO IltiLiiSINIWQti-A1NflOO tilOAUG i bT:ST T6i80/L0 1 • AO § § Vi ? k o ° oa § i ' ( �j !1� rr N NC) O h O f7 VI o ` 1L! tp �f W 8 O N a M W r {0 ig o E ow § 1 . i R t r000 (v "? 00000 224"t Qoov ouI000 al tto N ..7 M )QA r a, 1 i § § §• CO ((�� N , •' § {n c 'S� N N N eI g g i N to mo6a0 t a00�patoatica : i g 0 . 1 m 0 isclt 8 ? f. . i a . . 3 0. p a a 0U P - 2 att 9 k 1E ; All 9 4 ifii thin to v► 21z4t .t L.5 1 1 . : [qui H ; . 0 , 1 !ill xx zg . I1 . i p ! 41) • i 0000wv SMMC . . j £T0 WIltkilSINIWQti-1,14100 tilOAUG J ST:ST T6B0/2,0 p8 • U w 2 a 1 4 I N i iCi . (41. 4°. al I § g co I • 13 E S. te13 N '`' R a g § 2 o° °o °o e a o0 00 0 o q !*' CI IA N h {D in N T 2 O) co ,T N it .' 0 ,.. IL Ste". to ' d T Q Q Z .- r w w .- i U. LL LL L. 65›.L. 4. W w r 6 W . EIIII i § 1 o o < a a CZ cr ¢ o m a°'3 CD Cr) • f*t.‘'...t vr-*n..+•"..steiNummno.ei ie,..lePvM∎ns r'l0>e.c-.4!m,-0...0.tts”.+*+gT+^^•i......•......... .. ..... V TO ND I 1tiL11S I N I WQd-A1Nf1QD til0>$tiQ (.0 ST:ST T6i80/22 MEMO TO: THOMAS L HEDGES, CITY ADMINISTRATOR FROM: THOMAS A COLBERT, DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS DATE: MAY 20, 1991 SUBJECT: REVIEW OF COUNTY 5-YEAR CIP (1992-1996) On May 16, you forwarded to me a copy of the 5-Year County CIP (91- 95) wherein they requested the City to provide any comments regarding future modifications and/or changes for future CIP considerations. The following is a list of comments pertaining to the highway improvements: • 1994 Recommend a signal at the intersection of Wescott Road and Pilot Knob Road. • 1995 Recommend signal at Johnny Cake Ridge Road and Diffley Road. • 1996 Recommend signal at Rahn Road and Diffley Road. • 1996 Recommend urbanization and channelization project for Cliff Road from Slaters Road to Kennely Road in Burnsville. • Recommend delaying proposing upgrade of Lone Oak Road from TH 55 to Inver Grove Heights from 1995 to unspecified future date. • Recommend delaying Cliff Road upgrade from ChesMar Drive to Lexington Avenue from 1995 to unspecified future date. These recommendations are based on a best guess for future development proposals and related traffic needs as well as taking into consideration required City financial participation requirements beyond typical special assessment revenues. The proposed present 5-Year CIP (91-95) , although aggressive, is realistic and still anticipated as necessary to meet our growing community' s demands. If any additional review or comments are necessary, please let me - know. , 7 • 4 W‘s- 5 PI- Director of Public Works TAC/jj Agenda Information Memo July 16, 1991, City Council Meeting • APPROVE RESOLUTION RESTRICTING ON-STREET PARKING (WILDERNESS RUN ROAD) C. Project 603, Approve Resolution Restricting On-Street Parking (Wilderness Run Road)--On July 2, the Council approved the above-referenced project which provides for the upgrading of Wilderness Run Road from Lexington Avenue to Dodd Road and also approved the detailed plans and specifications providing for this Municipal State Aid Street to be constructed 36' wide. This width will allow for parking along the north side only. Subsequently, MnDot Municipal State Aid requires the City to pass a formal Resolution restrict' on-street parking along the south side of Wilderness Run Road. Enclosed on page (1 is a copy of the Resolution required by Municipal State Aid. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve a Resolution restricting on- street parking for the south side of Wilderness Run Road for Project 603 constructed under Contract 91-08 and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute all related documents. I CITY OF EAGAN • NO PARKING RESOLUTION Street City Project No. From To Wilderness Run Road 603 Lexington Avenue Dodd Boulevard (M.S.A. 195-116-01) (Dakota County Road 43) THIS RESOLUTION, passed the 16th day of July 1991, by the City of Eagan in Dakota County, Minnesota. The Municipal corporation shall hereinafter be called the "City". WHEREAS, these improvements do not provide adequate width for parking on both sides of Wilderness Run Road; approval of the proposed construction as a State Aid Street Project must therefore be conditioned upon certain parking restrictions, and WHEREAS, the extent of these restrictions that would be a necessary prerequisite to the approval of this construction as a State Aid project in the "City" has been determined. NOW,THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED that the "City" shall ban the parking of motor vehicles on the south side of Wilderness Run Road from Lexington Avenue to Dodd Boulevard, at all times. Motion made by: CITY OF EAGAN Seconded by: CITY COUNCIL Those in favor: Those Against: By: Dated: Attest: I, E.J. VanOverbeke, Clerk of the City of Eagan, Dakota County, Minnesota, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution as duly passed and adopted by the City Council of the City of Eagan, Dakota County, Minnesota, in a regular meeting thereof assembled this day of , 1991. • E.J. VanOverbeke, City Clerk • 1 � Agenda Information Memo July 16, 1991, City Council Meeting • APPROVE CHANGE ORDER #1 (1991 SEALCOATING PROGRAM) D. Contract 91-07,Approve Change Order #1 (1991 Sealcoating Program)--On July 2, the City Council received the bids and awarded the contract for the 1991 Sealcoating Program. This program incorporates the sealcoating of both City streets as well as parking lots and trailways. The total combined budget for this program in 1991 is $163,000 with $125,000 being the responsibility of the Public Works Street Maintenance Division and $38,000 budgeted under the Parks Maintenance Division. With the low bid coming in approximately $26,500 less than budget, there is an opportunity for the City to expand its sealcoating program by $20,249.77 for the City street portion and increasing the parking lot and trailway program by $3,829 for a total change order request of $24,078.77. Due to past years' budget constraints, the sealcoating program has been delayed. Subsequently, the favorable bids this year will allow us to help catch up on some of this delayed program. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve Change Order #1 to Contract 91-07 in the amount of $24,078.77 and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute all related documents. 11, APPROVE CHANGE ORDER #3 (MAINTENANCE FACILITY EXPANSION) E. Contract 89-03,Approve Change Order#3 (Maintenance Facility Expansion)--With the completion of the Maintenance Facility expansion/remodeling, a variety of work requests have been reviewed by the contractor and the City's consulting architect. It has been determined that it is appropriate to authorize a change order to the contract to cover the listing of changes that occurred throughout the contract as identified in the letter of June 12 from our architect enclosed on pages oZ I and 2�.. As can be seen, the net result of this Change Order plus the two Change Orders previously approved by Council action still results in the final cost of this contract being less than the amount approved by Council action when the contract was originally ordered. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve Change Order #3 to Contract 89-03 (Maintenance Facility Expansion) and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute all related documents. S THRESHER SOUARE DAVID I BENNETT . 700 THIRD STREET SOUTH -7-7 MARK G SWENSON MINNEAPOLIS MN 55415 2 DENNIS J.SUTLIFF PHONE i6i21370-0700 DAVID L GRAHAM FAX 1621370 1378 Iiiiiii PETER DONALD W RINGAROSE 411 B • R • W • A R C H 1 T E C T S • I N C. June 12, 1991 Tom Colbert Arnie Erhart City of Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Road . Eagan, MN 55122 RE: Eagan Maintenance 83-9004 City #559, Contract #89-03 Gentlemen, The following is a list of proposed adds and deducts to the contract along with back-up from Contractor: 0 1. Electrical Allowance remaining ($3,750.00) 2. Electrical credit from switchover work ($230.00) 3. Installation of separate circuit/computer lines $1,635.00 4. Various electrical changes (see back-up attached) and undercounter light ($3,836.00 + $155.00) $3,991.00 5. Changes to HVAC equipment per code official : Revisions to ductwork for return air and combustible air at storage area (C.D. #8) $431.00 . 6. Credit for minor excavation work not performed ($322.00) (I do not yet have back-up for this.) 7. Install vinyl base that was requested during construction period for storage/corridor $264.00 (See back-up attached) 8. Various gypsum board changes both add and deduct: net total $27.00 9. Structural steel changes and field conditions (see back-up attached) $2,623.00 Ill Net total of this Change Order Request $4,669.00 AN AFFILIATE OF THE BENNETT RINGROSE V OISFELD.jA�RMS.GARDNER INC GROUP ARCHITECTURE URBAN DESIGN.PLANNING.TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING MINNEAPOLIS•DENVER•PHOENIX•TUCSON•ST PETERSBURG•SAN DIEGO . Tom Colbert Arnie Erhart 411 City of Eagan June 12, 1991 Page 2 This is our last known Construction Change Order. Currently the project construction costs are as follows, not including the Salt Storage Building: Total approved by Council : $577,000.00 Original Contract Sum: $565,262.00 (Refer to attached notes that itemize deducts from original bid) Contract Sum through Change Order No. 2: $564,383.00 Total Cost if all of the current requested changes are acceptable: $569,052.00 Total Cost plus fence work ($569,052.00 + $3341.00) $572,393.00 0 Let me know if and when a meeting is scheduled with the Building Committee to answer questions. Sincerely, BRW ARCHITECTS, //7. C____ %/12/ 7 ' Jeff{ L. Oertel , AIA, CCS • Seri�i Associate JLO/cr 83-9004 9.2 • 41 J-D-- Agenda Information Memo • July 16, 1991, City Council Meeting RECEIVE FEASIBILITY REPORT/ORDER PUBLIC HEARING (MEADOWVIEW ROAD - STREETS & UTILITIES). F. Project 615, Receive Feasibility Report/Order Public Hearing (Meadowview Road - Streets & Utilities)--On May 23, 1991, the Council authorized the preparation of the feasibility report to review the proposed installation of streets and utilities for Meadowview Road from TH 13 towards the Minnesota River. This feasibility report has now been completed by Short-Elliott-Hendrickson, Inc., (SEH), and is being presented to the Council for their consideration of scheduling a public hearing to formally present and discuss these proposed improvements. Staff intends to hold a neighborhood meeting prior to the public hearing to distribute the information associated with this project and answer any questions that may arise. A summary of that neighborhood meeting will be included as a part of the formal public hearing process. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To receive the feasibility report for Project 615 (Meadowview Road - Streets & Utilities) and schedule a public hearing to be held on August 20, 1991. a3 Agenda Information Memo July 16, 1991 City Council Meeting GAMBLING LICENSE/MINNESOTA VALLEY HUMANE SOCIETY/ DURNINGS RESTAURANT G. Application, Gambling License for Minnesota Valley Humane Society to Conduct Pull Tab Operations at Durnings Restaurant, 4625 Nicols Road--An application has been received of the Minnesota Valley Humane Society for a license to conduct pull tab gambling at the above-referenced location. A copy of the application and a memo from Lieutenant Meszaros regarding this item are enclosed without page number for your review. Police Department and staff reviews,of this application indicate no reason to deny it at this time. Also enclosed on pages 6 through �iL are a letter from Dean Weigel which he requested be included in the packet and a copy of a resolution concerning this item. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve an application by the Minnesota Valley Humane Society for a gambling license to conduct pull tabs at Durnings Restaurant as presented. 0 -2 `-( • July 11 , 1991 Mr . Thomas Hedges City Manager City of Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan , Minnesota 55122 Dear Tom: This Tuesday , July 16th, our organization is coming before you and the Eagan City Council to propose operating a charitable gambling pull-tabs operation at Durnings Restaurant in Eagan . Jim Durning , the owner , has been a long-term supporter of the Minnesota Valley Humane Society. As you are well aware, the Minnesota Valley Humane Society struggled for a number of years in establishing a home and a base of operations for an animal shelter that would serve the communities in Dakota County . In searching for land and a building , we explored most of the eleven cities in Dakota County, including Eagan , to find a facility . At one time we had hopes of obtaining about five acres of land in Eagan that was to be donated by an animal welfare organization and building a facility. The building we finally purchased in Burnsville was the best choice available and is meant to serve the citizens and animals of Eagan as well as those in Burnsville and the rest of the county . My understanding is that Eagan is the second largest city in Dakota County (47,409) , but could become the largest city in the near future. Translating that demographic into the potential number of domestic animals just in Eagan , there are, at least, 10,886 pets ( 18,450 households x 597. owning at least one animal ) . • We plan on serving up to 100 animals per day and providing direct services for somewhere between 4,000 to 6,000 animals our first year. Eagan should provide a substantial portion of those animals based on its population and projected number of animals per household . We are expecting that the stray animals currently being brought to the Ramsey County Humane after the five to seven day stray- holding period will be brought to our shelter. We are also anticipating that the largest service areas will be Eagan , Minnesota Valley Humane Society • 1313 E. Highway S3, Bumsville, MN 55337 • (612) 894-5000 • LS • Burnsville, Apple Valley and Lakeville. Additional services and programs that directly benefit the city of Eagan include: -Seniors Outreach Program- The MVHS visits senior centers and nursing homes with pets -Education- Our education program provides animal welfare information to Eagan schools, civic groups, etc . -Lost & Found- We receive 10-20 calls per week regarding lost or found animals. -Investigations- Eagan ' s animal control agent is one of our certified state investigators. -Information Referral- Much of our work relates to referring people to various animal-related resources throughout the community , locally and statewide. Eagan has long been one of our strongest supporters and we could not have accomplished the purchase and renovation of our facility without your help. Our continuing financial strength will depend upon support through private means such as contributions and earned income. Charitable gambling is one means for us to generate on-going funds for our operations. Adoptions and surrenders will probably only generate about 50% of our income so we are very dependent upon other areas that can provide additional operating revenue. We are hopeful that you and the Council will support our premise permit for pull-tabs at Durnings Restaurant. We were extremely pleased that they considered our organization for this operation . The revenues generated from the pull-tab sales will be used to directly benefit animals and the public from Eagan . As I mentioned earlier, other than Burnsville, no city will benefit from the humane society services more, given the size and population of Eagan . S Thank you for your consideration and I look forward to seeing you and the Council on Tuesday evening . Sincerely , - Dean Weigel Executive Director Encl . 411 RESOLUTION CITY OF EAGAN GAMBLING PERMIT FOR MINNESOTA VALLEY HUMANE SOCIETY ON DURNINGS PREMISES WHEREAS, The Minnesota Valley Humane Society has applied for a gambling premise permit to conduct a pull tab operation at Durnings, 4625 Nicols Road, and WHEREAS, The Eagan Police Department has reviewed the application and has not identified any reason to deny. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of Eagan, Dakota County, Minnesota, hereby appoves the Minnesota Valley Humane Society application to conduct a pull tab operation at Durnings, 4625 Nicols Road. Motion made by: CITY OF EAGAN CITY COUNCIL Seconded by: BY: 410 Those in Favor: Those Against: ATTEST: Dated: CERTIFICATION I, E.J. VanOverbeke, Clerk of the City of Eagan, Dakota County, Minnesota, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution as duly passed and adopted by the City Council of the City of Eagan, Dakota County, Minnesota, in a regular meeting thereof assembled this 16th day of July 1991. B.J. VanOverbeke, City Clerk S c) Agenda Information Memo • July 16, 1991 City Council Meeting FINAL PLAT/SKY VIEW H. Final Plat, Sky View Addition--Final plat documents relative to the above referenced plat are currently being processed by the applicant and Community Development Department. If all items are completed and executed in time for next Tuesday's meeting, the application will be in order for approval. If not, a recommendation will be made to continue this item at the beginning of the meetin& A copy of the final plat as it appears for filing at Dakota County is enclosed on page 0 for your review. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the final plat for Sky View Addition as presented. • S EMIL. NtLiZil Z.'. •1 1.. M t Citj ul N e.■ > S CC _ cr 4 f . I ri sli I 1 ' i;2 • 1 !! : ! li i, i • I 1 ,1 Li •,1 f li 1 . a..: !.1 • I. 1 i :P t 1.! li i -. to 21 1 IsS 117-▪7• :it: in s 21. 1 1 .11 Id II Iii 1 ' ii I 'il .1 ;.2 • I 2121 21. 2. ii! 2 i '::: III I: III I 1..1 'Oil • • t < 0 IMMMP . :t MIMS $ S --• i 7. , 7 w • • 7 ---1 -i: t •t • I I.; ...., .!: — F t F-it , 1 i t It ? = , . ..___ _ " 2. " 7 ■■•- . ■•.-0....,..44.-..,- -or-•••—•-----... • X SO••••••• 8 • g-. 'i---- F4-1-4---- az a a • 2 • • ' • 1.11..a.mi•1 1'2. t ........ 'I 1.•' :-••..... ••t••••I, IA43.41 :I .1.10.1.0•• .-ig so. •■•••••■••••• op.....gt • •Iii ,,..1.-.....,••• •----...................... , . 1 t LLI .,I 7..:.I '..---7.L- r-...- /F."'-;I t••': -- .",•• t CI 1. ■ 1 1 I • --•--- .. I . •I 1 -•• ; / 1 1■ I ' ,••• l' '-1...`t.:4 4.1 II II I • 1 . I -11: i•-••••• ''' -7. 3: 7; ■ ( 11,1 / ..•t a . •.. , ii• 1 ,,. I I I ' / / - .r.• 1 1.: : , . . a... — :t .." .... . it .. > I a, ..''' : 1 i •1...!..I................ ..... `• --- .. II') I I 'f I 1 PI I ..........t. *.. - $ I .. I I I I 4 t'I .—.— _ 1 .---i--4;;:„....ti - ' ,- ••• , t • - ', I „ I •.""' • -.1 , L _ ' . "9.a.‘-% i I 0 $1 .i , • i.,... k...1 ...f4r- 1.1 s„...' , •b ... . • S' ■ --- ,„_:.7,-,. . C'Ov 2 ----Pr.:1, to • I ..1 1 >"' -...: it 2,, , •._ ,...„,s/ 1 J„tt.2.,.'•..1 , '' N i 1 k 1 Y . Ci) 1 ■ 4.'•ote. ' ' ■. i ' 1 1 'ft •-■ s.... 1 i .%.' 1 . 1 . •••• ' ..J 1 I f, . • ..!• 1 • ' 0 .•-■ '. ..Z... - i t. ... ■.1... ,L., I , ..) I t - ..... --.14;',.., 00_ ,•••,4% i - .. , ... •au. °Q s..:•• ---. •:1,. \" , I - . - . . ; ■ '..." s.,,e. 1 eis.c.,;........, 7.4,..,. . ----11 • .. , ---..--- — • - - ---'-.''''-'-- 3o Agenda Information Memo • July 16, 1991 City Council Meeting FINAL PLAT/WILLBROOK ADDITION I. Final Plat, Willbrook Addition--Final plat documents relative to the above referenced plat are currently being processed by the applicant and Community Development Department. If all items are completed and executed in time for next Tuesday's meeting, the application will be in order for approval. If not, a recommendation will be made to continue this item at the beginning of the meeting. A copy of the final plat as it appears for filing at Dakota County is enclosed on page 3 --for your review. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the final plat for Willbrook Addition as presented. • • • 3 l • IV L.) Z Z 0 0 w Vl 11.1 cri c>c. N D 0 cr tr: . . . a N .7. 2 0 I- I s 2 -J Z Lai • -1 2 1, tal< x .. . . 1-2 I 1 !1 11 i i i I 2. i i CI ..,•• O. 2 i i 2 1 1 4 2; I ' 2 i 4 CF.) 1 . 11) , . , i E ;,- 8 I Ji 2 := rs:2 1 21,1 1 2 0 1 1 . t C■1 1 • . !• •"' 1 I J 2 I .,•• .:2 - , ' . I i 1 il I 1 11 -----,z---3 I L_LJ i , ›• i C.) F -1 ! I 1 . - z 1 •1 1 "1 \ I If I , . 7. -,..: . ..-.: I 1 = i ; 0 1 i I i.,i H • , .2.IM lditit:V:. 1 0 __-----1 ... MIK. 6.4 0 I •44, /1 ''.1"' i- --I 1 , •-• i I z •I - . . : I : --.... .‘• N',...."..1.1TIV 13!_-_: '..10....N.ig.LF:A.',... J L . , - II ..). 1- 1 F• ; '•,; 1:1 N I 1 :7. - - -- -- - -- - -sr 2.-"-Z"-`- - I in 0 s.:. / 1 i..T ‘ c T.ri. , , , , )9^ 1 0 fi; 1 \\ I I ... I t 0 1 I \ \ .•.\ \ .1 I , I , 1 .,:...q. f r--.„,...- -oil..--1 • . X CC) I: I on \\ i.1 \ 0 21 i i ./ ;,- '.. .„...e2 '1 I ‹.'.;• .; L' !ii • _ w __I k: ,- I \..„.. J I__ I I_ 'st-,...: . .r---1-...-1.-- •a.as i • \ -1. --•-. .7.--. - - i 4,' • "-r " i. __J : ,..., ; 1..... ! •4 2 , .--"-- ....:7..... 5' ' f; • 12_,J.••, 1 — i 1:......-:-;........m ---■1/ :1i. 1Efr10) . NOOtielliM,•"..... •• '1" •, 14 : • -- ..1. ___- -- ''.'" " .14.! L -/i I J "4 .,. ,-...\ , - 7——--——— . .t, - ,./1 --__...t._1.1 .' ‘t 1 • f- -\.1 — i ' I l'‘ t.‘tl. .'ii‘■/4,0 I 13 ..t., „!..-. ' .• 1 1 I I I. ,• ! ,:-... , , 1 Ill _•, 0 !; ..,;-1 r-r,r I . 1 i a z tI!I 4',., \--.4 ill...;•Trx, i* I.I-. .--— 0 -lig 4;i1,- kt• \,__n___ --. • 1 ,...., et eli- I _1 r---7..z.---.7.47 I .Z.4, 1,II., in ,...,.. C. N ri . 1 ...., I .ii I It •• “ Tel?' / ..C,. '.. 8 , i 11 It:.ii I .;.. 1 1, 1 .... '4, t: i r•.1 '...s., I 1-: - ;el 10,1 1 7,1 1 2 11, I: e., -..... I 1,.4 0 I C* (-• 2) :1:: I 'el 'el , . 1 •• 4 4 .. -:1 ? • ... .- I :.: •I AC•I I I I L._2.1-•_•_ 1 ,A-6.,_ __-— j si i ... f ILI X 1. I 1 .- I f•N ,•• 1 r----e.a.--7 t.t,‘ 4.1. \----a• • .11 s• ell I ' •I 1 1.1 I I %.i .I, 1 re ... , .I I>)? V 1 2 !.I 1 II tri ftg P- V S I y y 4 1 --, • zi 1 • "-1-::. tO i .. . r ,,\ • , 1 1 1 1 1_ ,•• L J L- (7:-. ''' _ ..,t-,-.1 1 ,:i •—t• •— I ifi --- — i Ntot (3nN3Att NO.L .1.1 1)! ONIX31) I. !,r' I ' I 14 'PI 4•11 £5 II. x JO •11D11/.• 85 oyty A I:Inv:: TICNYC - '.■ " c 22 "ON OV02:1 AiNnop'. : ... .". -- •1/it III (3 I'.N 11 At; !..1C.1.1.t...!:•11 X-.3-1) • C.t, .C..I.1 1 0 ,Z: •!..1)•::-:: ! ..........•.,-..."-2..an.' .....__,._ 1 r----- 5 a- Agenda Information Memo • July 16, 1991 City Council Meeting FINAL PLAT/OAKS OF BRIDGEWATER 2ND ADDITION J. Final Plat,Oaks of Bridgewater 2nd Addition--Final plat documents relative to the above referenced plat are currently being processed by the applicant and Community Development Department. If all items are completed and executed in time for next Tuesday's meeting, the application will be in order for approval. If not, a recommendation will be made to continue this item at the beginning of the meeting: copy of the final plat as it appears for filing at Dakota County is enclosed on page L3-for your review. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the final plat for Oaks of Bridegwater 2nd Addition as presented. • 33 Z ({, W s '1w l�..� d . �•`� `h �` cc o N i��y�,ii, . a3 w ._. — .r' 1 -� . 1 2 W tit ! F- n is a' L S. J--'1-] 4 ii ' t .! / �_�--.__ .,\ • / , \ ,!may" {`rj5. '. ,4 . 41 / !{1\ f. Ul •�• 'G it, / _1164 ' ? `d_�/ ��;. J� j �.. TI - :7 e k- tip, / hi!• a -.., -I r p�. J g EI;9t .- ' i' > ;`=44 v. i Y ! a- LI "k�l�_ JIl I Li /,:11 Ii-i '+• z `` N•e44.17'' / 1—'7----,_,,,N'\\,-,;<be V -'. --I o ;1/4 ".c V )cc = CO I"• • CY, 4 r"•.-N, N *1 • •.,rte , ,,',. ..• P -'t I s 3 0 ;y,- ��WYY = Q it 2--- • i.• /'' hds a /- : /1j 1 i I IL �t �' ti •�: fj r .d'�•Y 1 11 9[ I ` . • • Lii W Q //i�l e o Z 1 • • • tJJ• Q !6 f! I� O. ' . s�C�- r kit -f. I t f�• u.. i a:V s' 2r i e, • • Oict .. ''' —``.-�.� _.t.••: i /-` - C * tip c� ''9 F., . -�" ;.•z. �` 1 • { iii! Z if :.(— li :/'4\ • y .�,.w-• • \� - ,/ s • _ _r 0 f� - a,_, • .r^� -j WA fig• • �:p r..sr is _ I. • i o, 17 1 i= • . �% a .a - OVOa-" a.ir ••_ .». ah. : • `.... y1_—,._ ', •ttOa _ ttle• •y..ows•w f• ..— --.:..._ a A.•[�� J�ty //t e 1:I —.-- — ---- `ou 7 1 r--- i.: :rIi.,C:r r.; II: ...:•.r. :w. _:r�::I:.�: ∎-1:. I tI`'"t 1 _ c)')'.,,a. Yaa rl":iri H:.OS ;I:. I r -I• I ••;:t: III IYaaI I .].S I YY Mt I,Y_. • • ..AOM l,.•Mel M T1aa.r-•P el.•i w—: p SHd.3AW !stS33NIDN3 I SU3NNYb 1 ie 9 ■ y a Ul 4.3/ NOi1LM NOISIA7Y DUI `tUUH•� sawt'( 1 : i 12 i Ul 1J/(•1fY • AYYMIMIL YA Dui 3 5( AOPUS PROPERTIES, INC. RECEIVED 1 5 1991 ♦ r Anthony J.Navarro,Jr. 16121 9364690 501 Opus Center Mailing Address 9900 Bien Road Fast PO Rex 59110 Minnetonka, Minnesota 55343 Minneapolis, Minnesota 55440 16121 936-4600 July 11, 1991 Mayor Tom Egan City of Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, Minnesota 55122 Re: City Project #601 Dear Mayor Egan: I understand the City Council will be acting on the above project at its July 16th meeting. ALSCOR Investors Joint Venture, a partner between Opus Corporation and American Linen Supply Company, owns the property at the southwest corner of Lone Oak Road and Lexington Avenue. A couple of years ago, ALSCOR platted this property into Eagandale Center Industrial Park #9. During that platting and assessment process, the lots bordering County Road 26 & 43, Lone Oak Road and Lexington Avenue, were required to dedicate land for this project and were assessed for full road improvements at the commer- cial/industrial rates per City Project #104 and as shown on Exhibit D to the subdivision's Development Contract. ALSCOR questions why there is a new assessment being suggested • against the bordering lot for road improvements. Have we not already been assessed for such? The feasibility report calls the new assessment an "overlay" charge. The roads are not being overlaid but widened to accommodate turning lanes and signalization. ALSCOR feels that such assessments are inappropriate, are not in accordance with the City's Assessment Policy, and should be removed from the feasibility report, especially for those lots along Lone Oak Road which was recently upgraded during the I-35E installation. Marc Anderson or I will be available to answer any questions regarding our request. Very truly yours, ALSCOR INVESTORS JOINT VENTURE By: OPUS PROPERTIES, INC., Managg Agent A thony J. N ar o, Jr. enior Vice( resi ent AJN/Itr0026 cc: Tom Hedges Tot Colbert Opus Affiliates in Minneapolis•Chicago•Phoenix•Milwaukee•Tampa•Pensacola Agenda Information Memo • July 16, 1991, City Council Meeting PUBLIC HEARINGS: LEXINGTON AVE/LONE OAK RD (INTERSECTION RECONSTRUCTION & SIGNALIZATION) A. Project 601, Lexington Avenue/Lone Oak Road - Intersection Reconstruction & Signalization)--On July 2, a public hearing was held to discuss the proposed improvements referenced under this project. However, at that hearing, Opus Corporation requested additional ti we to review the details associated with this project; enclosed on pages 3(0 through ,3� are letters from the Opus Corporation & Northwestern Mutual Life. Subsequently, the Council continued this public hearing until July 16 and directed staff to hold a neighborhood meeting with all affected property owners to review the proposed improvements prior to the continued hearing on July 16. Enclosed on pages 39 through 1/6 is a summary of the meeting held on Thursday evening, July 11. Also enclosed on pages 47 through is a copy of the feasibility report for the Council's reference and review during the public hearing for this project. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To close the public hearing and approve • Project 601, Lexington Avenue/Lone Oak Road (Intersection Reconstruction & Signalization). • 3s/ ♦ OPUS CORPORATION R 'r.c���p 'U( 2 1991 � DESIGNERS•CONTRACTORS•DEVELOPERS 800 Opus Center Mailing Address • 9900 Bren Road East P.O Box 150 Minnetonka, Minnesota 55343 Minneapolis,Minnesota 55440 1612)936-4444 fax(6121 936-4529 July 11, 1991 The Honorable Mayor Tom Eagan City Council Members City of Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan. MN 55121 RE: Improvement Project 601 Gentlemen: apologize for any confusion we caused regarding the continuance of the public hearing process for this project at your July 2 Council meeting. Opus is in favor of the reconstruction and signalization of the intersection of Lone Oak Road and Lexington Avenue. However, we do have some concerns, which are as follows : Firstly, Opus owns and manages the 166,000 square foot complex known as Lone • Oak Business Center at 1030 and 1060 Lone Oak Road. There are two entrances to the complex, one on Lone Oak Road and one on Neil Armstrong Boulevard, but only one, on Lone Oak Road, that accesses the truck court for the buildings . Therefore, we -request that Lone Oak Road be made accessible to local traffic during its reconstruction. Also, trucks entering from Neil Armstrong Boulevard will not be able to maneuver through the auto lot and will damage the lighter bituminous in the auto area. Secondly, Opus owns and leases the building on the southeast corner of Lone Oak Road and Lexington Avenue, currently leased to the Church of St. Thomas Beckett. The only access to this facility is on Lone Oak Road so accessibility during construction is again necessary. Thirdly, we have concerns as it relates to the storm sewer system. Opus developed the Eagandale Center Industrial Park #3 Subdivision to current standards at that time including an adequate storm sewer system. In the late seventies and early eighties, after some years of extensive rain, the City engineers decided to change the storm water requirements so that the current piping is no longer adequate without the use of detention ponds. Every recent project constructed (five buildings and approximately 400,000 square feet) in the southeastern quadrant of Lone Oak Road and Lexington Avenue has been saddled with the requirement of on site storm water storage. • Attiiiateo Companies Opus u S Corporation.Opus Arcn tests aro Engineers tic..Opus Norm Corporation,Opus Soutn Corporation,Opus Soutnwes;Corporation. Nprmanoa e Properties inc.. Opus Properties Inc. Chicago•Milwaukee•Minneapolis Tampa•Pensacola•Phoenix•San Diego•Seame (1" ./tea , /' Mayor Tom Eagan • July 11 , 1991 Page —2— It appears from the feasibility report that the County is planning to dump the storm water from its widened road directly into our undersized storm sewer system. Also the design of Lone Oak Road lowers its high point which shifts more storm water toward the east and into the undersized system. Although the quantities are not great, three acres of additional drainage and 1/2 an acre foot of storage, our position is that if the County doesn' t cover this cost, we will have to make up the difference in a future project by providing additional ponding somewhere else. We would ask that this project be required to meet the current storm water detention standards like any other development in the City. Bob Worthington and I will be present at your meeting of July 16 to answer any questions regarding our concerns or positions taken on issues identified within this letter. Sincerely, OPUS CORPORATION r1€- Marc S. Anderson • Director Real Estate Development MSA/kf cc: Tom Hedges, City Manager Tom Colbert, Public Works Director • 37 Suite 1490 '"(�r , 8400 Normandale Lake Boulevard RECEIVED Bloomington,Minnesota 55437 t t `� JUL 1 2 fV"4 Northwestern Telephone:612-921-2100 ! mutual Life • REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT OFFICE July 11, 1991 The Honorable Mayor Tom Eagan Members of the City Council City of Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Road - Eagan, Minnesota 55122 RE: Project 601 Upgrading of the intersection of Lexington & Lone Oak Road Dear Mayor Eagan: I am writing to indicate our support for the planned upgrading of the intersection of Lexington Avenue and Lone Oak road, known as Project 601. We do however have some concerns as follows: 1. Overlay charge of $4,870 against Lot 2, Block 1 of Eagandale Center Industrial Park No. 10 - We were assessed $45,033.52 in 1988 with the first installment due in 1989 for the installation of the present intersection. The new overlay charge seems excessive, given the original assessment in 1988. 2. Sanitary Sewer & Water service for Parcel 010-50 and Lot 13 in Eagandale Center Industrial Park No. 2 - I understand the $8,000 figure is an estimate, and hopefully, all of the funds will not be needed. 3. Future water holding pond - I note that in connection with the upgrading of Lone Oak Road a new water holding pond will be required along with the realignment of Neil Armstrong Boulevard. I am anticipating the extra land required will be purchased at the appropriate time. Ai'•dest regards, Da a E. Huber Regional Manager DEH/te cc: Bob Worthington Tom Hedges Tom Colbert Mark Hanson THE NORTHWESTERN MUTUAL LIICbURANCE COMPANY•Milwaukee 14 : 0 9 P O N E S T R O O & ASSOCIATES P - 0 2 Otte G.'peewee.PE. KMh A.WW1,Pi. Mutt R.Rea%PE. Rene C Plume.ALA RObRt W.Rofcnt RE. Nehud W.Potter PE Rebell C User.A,LA, Aro M Rug.Ar,CP Bones t roa E +C.M EM P.E. Donald C."unmet PE, Therm E.Angus P . xmy 0 Reuter+ PE • Rosene L seala PE. Jetty BONIdOr.P.E. How A.$,tb PE. Ce Onler,Pi NehoM E.Rm+er,Pi Mule A.itas bn.IE. Denbl 1 Etlgtybn,PE, Robert R.ore um Pt, MOM Anderlik & Gum P.Cook. K.Ptld,Pt. MMr A.AMA RE. Guy W.MMen.RE Ander Tholm 6.Noyes PE, Mlavel T lawmen,PE, PM"J.Ceeweb Pi. !tire"L Women.PA bbert G Sthunkht PA. Wert R PM*.P.E. Ismael McRret.PL. WV"t Vim Pk Associates amn M menu,CAA. ORM 0 Letabn,PA, Mani O.will I.E. Owen A IMUan sronwl W.Peterson,AL Tfwmet R M etnort A.I.A. Leo M.PA+elsay Menses C.Lyrxn,P!. Gory P,"Aenmv,P.A. marten M Often Engineers & Architects M+et R.WIN,P.E. mkt I Amen PE. Ipenneth P Women PE. L Pl Gravel it PG. MEMO TO: MAYOR & CITY COUNCIL THOMAS IEDGES, CITY ADMINISTRATOR FROM Mark Hanson (BRA) DATE: July 12, 1991 SUBJECT: Project 601, Lexington Avenue & Lone Oak Road Intersection Reconstruction/Stgnalizatlon • A neighborhood meeting was held for the above project from 6:30 P.M. to 9:00 P.M. on Thursday, July 11, 1991. Five residential property owners and one commercial property owner (Northeast Corner Lexington/Lone Oak)were in attendance. Listed below are the concerns and issues raised by the property owners followed by the comments from staff. Staff included Pete Sorenson (Dakota County Traffic Engineer), John Windgard (Eagan Engineer) and myself. • ISSUES & CONC RNM BY PROF .TY ORNF,S • Intersection functions fine as 4-way stop why make improvements? No accidents occurring now. - Center medians are not required for similar intersections, why this one? Access to our properties will be limited to right in and right out. - Traffic signal will cause traffic to speed through intersection,why not Ieave as 4-way stop? More air pollution with traffic signal. - Design speed of 40.50 mph is too fast resulting in more accidents. - Widening of street will result in significant tree removal, doesn't Eagan protect trees? Trees are our buffer zone. - Semi trailers leaving commercial property in northeast corner of intersection must back onto Lexington Avenue to leave property, center median will not allow this to happen. Page 1. • 49.cor 3 2335 West Highway 36 • St, Paul, Minnesota 55113 • 612.6364600 JIJL -12 - 9 1 FR I 14 : 10 BONESTROO 8. ASSOCIATES R - 03 • - Traffic to Post Office backs onto Lexington Avenue blocking driveway to commercial property in northeast corner and causing a safety hazard in Lexington Avenue. - Bituminous Trail (8' wide) and boulevard (8' wide) encroach too far into our property? Bituminous trail on Lone Oak Road north side west of Lexington Avenue is directly next to curb. Why not eliminate boulevard to save trees and reduce easement acquisition? - Due to the recent overlay of Lexington Avenue,how can you assess us for overlay when it's not needed? This project benefits all of Eagan and Dakota County not just the people who abut this project. Why are we assessed at a commercial rate? - The property owners took exception to Dakota County Surveyors placing stakes on private property without permission. The survey stakes were placed to identify new right-of-way. - Why is so much additional right-of-way being acquired beyond bituminous trail? TAFF RESPONSE TO PROPERD OWNERS - This intersection is unique in that it has significant turning movements from Lexington • Avenue to Lone Oak Road from north to west and right turn movements from Lone Oak Road to Lexington Avenue from east to south (See Exhibit A & B. Also refer to Exhibit C for complete ADT's for entire area). Relative to accidents(See Exhibit D), 18 accidents have occurred over the past 3 years at this intersection which is more than what is expected at a 4-way stop. - Due to the traffic counts and unique turning movements,the center medians are required. The center median in Lone Oak Road seems to be accepted by the residents. However, the center medians in Lexington Avenue are of greater concern. The Lexington Avenue median south of Lone Oak is definitely required due to the amount of turning movements. Therefore, the center median north of Lone Oak Road in Lexington Avenue is also required to align with the center median south of Lone Oak Road. Pete Sorenson indicated that the concrete medians In Lexington Avenue as proposed are the minimum and can't be shortened. - The traffic signal will allow traffic to move safely through the intersection. Once roadway widths become 5 lanes and larger four-way stops do not function safely. It's presently felt that the higher accident rate at this intersection with the existing 4-way stop is due to the existing roadway width. Traffic does not move safely through a wider intersection with a four-way stop. - The existing speed limit in Lone Oak Road and Lexington Avenue south of Lone Oak Road is 50 mph. Lexington Avenue north of Lone Oak is 35 mph. We don't expect these • speed limits to change from existing. Page 2. 49.cor L(0 2 - 91_ ,PR I 14 : 1 0 B O N E S T R O O IL ASSOC I AYES P _ 04 • - Access to the Post Office and the commercial property in the northeast corner of the intersection will not change other than the center median will prevent left turns from the commercial property onto Lexington Avenue. It was suggested maybe a shared access be developed between the two properties. This will have to be reviewed further with the property owners, City, and County. - The 8' bituminous trail and 8'boulevard does definitely impact the trees and right-of-way acquistion especially for the residential properties located in the northwest quadrant of the intersection. It was stated that the boulevard width is required to protect pedestrians from the traffic flow, provide snow storage and allow adequate area for signage. Consideration maybe given to reducing boulevard width in this area. - The assessment for overlay, concrete curb, and street reconsturction is consistent with present City policy. However, due to the recent overlay of Lexington Avenue by Dakota County and the new construction of Lone Oak Road between Lexington Avenue and I-35E, the overlay assessment may have to be reviewed. The commercial rate is assessed based on the highest and best use of the property not its present use. This has been City policy based on recommendations from the City attorney's office and the City's appraisers. - The additional right-of-way taking will be reviewd by Jerry Kingray at Dakota County to 4, determine if reductions can be made. - The project schedule is such that if the acquisition of easements can be accomplished in August, construction could begin this fall. If not, construction will begin next spring. • • Page 3. 49.cor /),/, 5:3-6"-(-7---- 6o / 7///9/ /-'1.[)(//✓ )r-) . (/N. 0/ K 0/Y-4/VE- -4,a)4fi,________.;_e--s . 74-k/ut, /l't...� �' 7 ,%<.:r c0/.-- `e4 (.67.5 /,,, ,,,,-) 16, 400 at......tp.A.2„ ez,..^.).„)„,„ .I_c,, .s- ,s.0 14,21/,_,,,,y.rx% 4_As--- _,47/ -7, 1 1Q ^"_ K ISJV.,r: ,-9,,s-., ,4 -y ..:._---, :.r,,.`, iis^-y_ / -/ > C, X4,7, L/%--6-' -..7 f77 ..,Z3 ,4 .. %2 y 5�,�-- /f_ _c /),z,:Z B/L,t'. (i, _t_. / / /I / / /( / 4----..e 1 2L>-- A.e_e- -n. 61, 6z) =A., 4,Q ;. 17.6-V- y/ ,rj. 72-) t �J .4 ..1-.P/ Z„,,,c, c)tc ,• 4.r y. 0_,...,' anti._. 339-403e9 ( r n Li (;J 1 r ..- C _.-:_,--7,- r T • 2-(r--). Form 2944 A Rev. EXHIBIT A O 1-- O � Z •LL1 z E-- O Q ....,04 e, cc F- 0 c^ c QW C3...„, I... 5 Qv) aN 0 I-I O C7 F- *k 0 W v a. u C 2W o 4, .2o¢ O J u c+ ^ n U-1 Uj ra = W pW I c1 0 •= c Z ERs 0 `... C7 - } O NO a' o = Z 02 N R ns Cs • In vc W LO ^ c. < z ■ aZ o � - wa ~ = z v [til CR 43-LIX/1n 1.41 ' 111 1- }- too 4 L .00 I V- 4 M 8 50 0 m o © $ 0- " 3 O IN a M Zoo D ( -{ F'- N ..... ‘\ t c..)cio < I I V.- oo 0 I k 't . 1 t , • s I oz 1 o p z . .t a F a �- , b o C I 4_, o • Q r-r o a R , al i CU 0 $4 IZ E-4 Ol N ' 4 o a ..,z ^ ,, r do ci ),.. .-(f). -,, e-4 • 7-*' tiV'• 0d 4-, � cvlr, 1 •C G U -J �t ac ct o_ N L.(3 Form 2944 A Rev. EXHIBIT B Z • �' 4 ix E- p a W = >N CI, I.- ca s.o o o � o s ti W F-}- ? 2 d c-o< r W� r u ` ^ LO.JW o '_S W O a .3 aPs W LU n) E u c.) - N N Q z O i = N ~ � o z t a ~ z ce zI- V 513S IIIMM C4 43- Le re;., - 4n he. 01© qL 27o a 4111 4"t cv M r 60 linaillEll g m Luz o -1 1-4- N N CM N � I ►- mp�� ..= i 1 1 0 i c., i 4 ' Ha i I o °0. `430 d 1 ° .a C. c b O �" q) c. 4 4. d C LI .° v q,: cg III I) N v O ° �- I INIIc art BUJ O Z v. 4 N 4C . 444 EXHIBIT C ‘ 1-- 0 0 o o "P O .0...... Z L,(,(-7 c.,00Cb al 0 E rt3 1 44 CO CO Wtri CC1A3 It : 414 y goo 00 � Ca To o cc ir‘)* b.c too OJ 3XAN � � � N (° ~ m 1... V, '2 ip > m fc3 caov o � ' I 0 0 o N Z c . 11330 rn OCC = W 3d01 `* CD C13 W CA M DNOILLSWIN 00 1t3N 0 hC LS ar '' 00l'c1 O 009' 2 009'Ll et au 03 NOIJNIX31 2 0005 p o° N a) Nh . • CD 000 I 1.1L EXHIBIT D Dakota County Highway Department LI Collision n i o Diagram pp M NORTH 0I 3 i , ° !, ', J 3 ACCIDENT TOTALS • * CO 1987 3 CSAH 26 0 0 o -II 1988 6 Lone Oak Rd 8 V9_89 9 R.P.: 1.780 1 / JUNE '90...3 11-22-89(17) DATE PREPARED: 10-11-90 k0. 1-25-89(16) ,PCL-C-D L-C-D 12-21-89(23) 12-01-88(08) Ht.) S-S-I L-C-D 08-24-S7(15) 02-07-90(16) 02-22-89(08) L-C-D L-C-D L-C-D 04-14-88(12) 03-Q3-89(08) <-0K L-C-D 03-21-89(07) Q� 0 L-C-D L-S--I 07-07-87(17) >0 > 06-09-89(11) 2 3 L-C-D L-C-D > V ° rn�. co 0 i r. V I J 04-01-88(17) o L-C-D Q o ACCIDENTS IN UUEST1ON C ° U # 71310219 M O+4 1 J I .X a � U _1 OC O Standard Symbols > MOTOR VEHICLE MOVING AHEAD • FATAL PEDESTRIAN ¢ POLE c BICYCLE — MOTOR VEHICLE BACKING UP ACCIDENT C MOTORCYCLE 0 FIXED OBJECT "V ANIMAL —> MO1OR VEHICLE STOPPED ® PERSONAL =�-- REAR END INJURY UGHT: WEATHER: SURFACE: OUT OF CONTROL 0 PROPERTY L = DAYLIGHT C = CLEAR D = DRY RIGHT ANGLE DAMAGE D = DARK R = RAIN W = WET S = DARK S = SNDW I = ICE W/STREET LIGHTS F = FOG INTERSECTION CSAH 26 & CR 43 qco I N EAGAN FROM 01 -01 -87 TO 06-30-90 SOURCE MNDOT PRINTOUT S A f. r 1 tctt Report for LEXINGTON AVENUE (C.R.43) AND LONE OAK ROAD (C. S. A. H. 26) Intersection Reconstruction/Signalization • Project No. 601 Eagan, Minnesota May, 1991 File No. 49516 • Otto G.Bonestroo.P.E. Keith A.Gordon.P.E. Mark R.Roth.P.E. Rene C.Plumart.A.I.A. Bones t roo Robert W Rosene.PE. Richard W Foster.P.E. Robert C.Russek,A.I.A. Agnes M Ring,A.I.C.P Joseph C.Anderlik.PE. Donald C.Burgardt.P.E. Thomas E.Angus,P.E. Jerry D.Pertzsch.P.E. atiRosene Marvin L.Sorvala.PE. Jerry A.Bourdon,P.E Howard A.Sanford.P.E. Cecilio Olivier,P.E. Richard E.Turner.P.E. Mark A.Hanson.P.E. Daniel J.Edgerton,P.E. Robert R.Dreblow P.E. rl.I Glenn R.Cook,PE. Ted K.Field,P.E. Mark A.Seip.P.E. Gary W Morien,PE. • ii Anderlik & Thomas E.Noyes,P.E. Michael T Rautmann,P.E. Philip J.Caswell.PE. Karen L.Werner',F.E. Associates Robert G Schunicht.P.E. Robert R.Pfefferle.P.E. Ismael Martinez.P.E. Keith R Yapp.P.E. Susan M.Ebertin.C.P.A. David O.Loskota.PE. Mark D.Wallis,P.E. Charles A.Erickson Thomas W.Peterson.P.E. Thomas R.Anderson,A.I.A. Leo M.Pawelsky Michael C.Lynch.P.E. Gary F Rylander.P.E. Harlan M.Olson Engineers & Architects James R.Maland.P.E. Mies B.Jensen,P.E. Kenneth P Anderson.PE. L.Phillip Gravel III P.E. May 23, 1991 Honorable Mayor and city Council City of Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55122 Re: Lexington Avenue (C.R. 43) & Lone Oak Road (C.S.A.H. 26) Intersection Reconstruction/Signalization Project No. 601 - Our File No. 49516 Dear Mayor and Council: Transmitted herewith is our report for Lexington Avenue (C.R. 43) and Lone Oak Road (C.S.A.H. 26), Intersection Reconstruction/Signalization, Project No. 601. The proposed improvements associated utility construction and cost estimates are discussed and presented in this report. A preliminary assessment roll is also included. • We will be pleased to meet with the Council and other interested parties at a mutually convenient time to discuss this report. Yours very truly, BON ST O , ROSENE, ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES, INC. Mark A. Hanson MAH:Ii I hereby certify that this report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Registered Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minn ota. Reviewed by:` '1/,c e./Lor..c1— 166ist CO t."--- Dept. of Public Works Mark A. Hanson Date: # -/t9 -' Date: May 23, 1991 Reg. No. 14260 I , Reviewed by: t, i L. A Fi i1-ce Director • Date: Cv -/O-9/ + 2335 West Highway 36 • St. Paul, Minne ota • 612-636-4600 • LEXINGTON AVENUE (C.R. 43) & LONE OAK ROAD (C.S.A.H. 26 INTERSECTION RECONSTRUCTION/SIGNALIZATION EAGAN, MINNESOTA PROJECT NO. 601 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page No. LE'FI ER OF TRANSMITTAL 1. TABLE OF CONTENTS 2. SCOPE 3• FEASIBILITY AND RECOMMENDATION 3. DISCUSSION 3. STREET 3• FIGURE 1 - LOCATION PLAN 4. FIGURE 2 - INTERSECTION LAYOUT 5. STORM SEWER 6. SANITARY SEWER/WATER 7. COST ESTIMATE 8. RIGHT-OF-WAY/EASEMENT/PERMITS 8. AREA TO BE INCLUDED 9. ASSESSMENTS 10. REVENUE 11. PROJECT SCHEDULE 13. APPENDIX A - PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL APPENDIX B - ASSESSMENT RATE CALCULATION FIGURE 3-7 - UTILITY LAYOUT FIGURE 8 - STREET ASSESSMENT 2. • 49516.RPT q/\ • SCOPE: This project provides for the reconstruction of the intersection at Lexington Avenue (C.R. 43) and Lone Oak Road (C.S.A.H. 26) which includes the installation of a traffic signal (Figure No. 1). The existing utilities will be reconstructed and upgraded as required. The intersection improvements are proposed at this time due to the existing traffic volumes and turning movements resulting at this intersection. The existing traffic volume meets warrants for a traffic signal. Listed below are the 1988 average daily traffic volumes (ADT) as determined by Dakota County and the projected traffic volumes for the year 2010. 1988 ADT 2010 ADT Lone Oak Road (C.S.A.H. 26) West of Lexington Avenue 12,700 26,670 East of Lexington Avenue 6,900 14,490 • Lexington Avenue (C.R. 43) South of Lone Oak Road 7,500 15,750 North of Lone Oak Road 2,800 5,880 FEASIBILITY AND RECOMMENDATION The project is feasible from an engineering standpoint and is in accordance with the Master Utility and Street Plans for the City of Eagan and Dakota County. The project as outlined herein will be administered by Dakota County. The City of Eagan will be required to enter into a cost sharing agreement with Dakota County similar to past agreements. DISCUSSION Street: The proposed street improvements include widening and reconstructing Lexington Avenue and Lone Oak Road approximately 700' in each direction from their intersection. Lexington Avenue north and south of Lone Oak Road presently exists as a 4 lane roadway with • concrete curb to the south and bituminous curb to the north. Lone Oak Road west of Lexing- 49516.RPT 3. SD ,-----' 1.. Ali e+rasrArr MV ra«1 C e iiiiiniti i 0"1111.1iillb 11Will"00‘ 1 Viiiiiiiiii. �/27 Ie Z• 30 n 32 u x S >e 2 o 132-02 11 10 I e 7 • e n- 3 �al,© / lm 611.11IIII_,.L,.051105 :.\ / 4 it*$,* 4.1 I I Kir milui■ PIP 041,4 It . f*Ez�. �ooaa Eltretii ♦ iLi „: ite• ` TIMM % 020-75 m .:nadn©0 m el :dm f�t��r�`� C©D 065-00 — � W�i1i�i��0©©0 Dto�uc mna+ 17,E '' En mar i Inc El=s 191-04 rROJ ECT _ .::''!'.72 , LOCATIO M lingMl I $ � * 3 • S: LONE OAK RD �� oe ; LI x CQ joff, g e 7 e •to it 12+3 rioco 010-03 © e , L: @ 1{ 1'Or si 32 x sa ,-01 !I 1 010-26 17 APOLLO 40 1 11111111( 041 . 17 ��iiTT LU to 2 , 10 1 s7f Q 03,4, m 1°421 010-05 0 25 25 24 23 22 072-04 010, -0 r 6 V TSIi'Abb 4 2 • 1 2 3 3 5 D♦1-Oe 10 5 J 010-57 1 3 : 1 a AL ,. .� o ,000 2oc = 010_90 0+0-76 m s 1 Akt4 Scale in feet 4 LOCATION PLAN j )j Bonestrt� Rosene il Anderlik d EAGAN, MINNESOTA FIGURE 1 Associates (C.S.A.H. 26 LEXINGTON AVE.(C.R. 43) & LONE OAK RO AD ( 26) Engineers 5 Architects 2335 West Highway 96 49\49516\49516L0C MAY 1991 COMM. 49516 St. Paul, Minnesota'55113 I 1 lli L1 r- r 1-, V I Q 0 I1 r 14' 1214'1114' 14 , Z X i W C.S.A.H. 26 t3' BIT RAIL ', ;BIT .-RAIL 14' 410■1111111ms, 14' 14' ■ ®.11.1 12' 6: ) e 14' 14' mil . 12' INININ■NIN■ I■• 14' 12' str' 14' 14' wiN i = 1L. s ' 1f:'t*: �' NE OAK ROA � i 1 1 7 I s?. 14',14' < 14'112'12' 14' 0 50 100 Scale in INTERSECTION LAYOUT ti Bonestroo • }IGURE � Rosene EAGAN, MINNESOTA 2 Associates LEXINGTON AVE.(C.R. 43) & L - AK ROAD (C.S.A.H. 26) Engineers a Architects 2335 West Highway 36 49\49516\49516F01 MAY 1991 COMM. 49516 in Paut. Minnesota 55113 • • ton Avenue exists as a 5 lane roadway with concrete curb and was upgraded as part of the construction of I-35E with Lone Oak Road. Lone Oak Road east of Lexington Avenue exists as a two lane rural section roadway. A four way stop sign presently exists at the intersection. The specific improvements for Lexington Avenue and Lone Oak Road west of Lexington Avenue include removal of existing concrete and bituminous curbs and constructing new concrete curbs to accommodate the design street width. The existing street section will be maintained and the area between the new concrete curb and existing street section will be patch. The center medians will be constructed on the existing street surface. Once the new concrete curbs, center medians, and bituminous patching is complete, the entire street surface will be overlayed with a 1-1/2" thick 2341 Bituminous Wear Course (Modified). The street improvements proposed for Lone Oak Road east of Lexington Avenue include complett reconstruction that includes grading and storm sewer. The design street width each direction from the intersection provide for four driving lanes and left turn lanes separated by a center median. An additional right turn is provided on Lone Oak Road west of Lexington Avenue and on Lexington Avenue south of Lone Oak Road. The design street widths are shown on the Figure No. 2. As previously mentioned, a new traffic signal is also included. Storm Sewer. Storm sewer exists in Lexington Avenue and Lone Oak Road west of Lexington Avenue. Storm sewer improvements proposed in those sections include extensions to the existing system as shown on the attached drawing. Storm sewer does not exist in Lone Oak Road east of Lexington Avenue. Therefore, it's proposed to extend a new storm sewer system westerly in Lone Oak Road from the existing 36" storm sewer in Neil Armstrong Boulevard as 49516.RPT 6. • shown on Figure No. 3. The existing 36" storm sewer in Neil Armstrong Boulevard is limited in capacity. Therefore, in accordance with the Comprehensive Storm Sewer Plan, it's recommended a future ponding area (Pond EP-9) be developed on the north side of Lone Oak Road between Neil Armstrong Boulevard and Lone Oak Circle. It's recommended the ponding area be developed when Lot 12 of Eagandale Center Industrial Park No. 2 develops or Lone Oak Road (C.S.A.H. 26) is upgraded west of Neil Armstrong Boulevard. The 27" storm sewer proposed herein will connect to the existing 36" storm sewer at Neil Armstrong Boulevard. In the future, the existing 27"storm sewer will be reconstructed and discharge directly into the new ponding area (Pond EP-9) once its developed. Sanitary Sewer and Water: Sanitary sewer and water main of sufficient size and capacity exist in both Lone Oak Road and Lexington Avenue. As a result, no improvements or upgrades are 410 recommended to these systems. However, adjustment of manhole structures, gate valves and relocation of existing hydrants is required. In addition, due to the grade changes proposed in Lone Oak Road east of Lexington Avenue approximately 350' of 16" water main must be reconstructed and lowered approximately 3'. It's also proposed to extend a 6"water main and 8"sanitary sewer service to serve future development in Parcel 010-50 and Lot 13 of Eagandale Center Industrial Park No. 2. • 49516.RPT 7. J � • COST ESTIMATE The estimated cost for this project is summarized below which includes overhead costs. Overhead costs are estimated at 30% and include legal, engineering, administration, and construction interest. Street $525,000 Traffic Signal 136,000 Bituminous Trail/Sidewalk 47,000 Storm Sewer 125,000 Sanitary Sewer & Water Main Adjustment 36,000 Sanitary Sewer/Water Service 8.000 TOTAL $877,000 RIGHT-OF-WAY AND EASEMENT The project will require additional street right-of-way (R.O.W.). Listed below is th410 approximate area and additional right-of-way required for each section of road. The easement acquisition/negotiation process is administered by Dakota County. Additional R.O.W. Lexington Avenue north of Lone Oak Road: West Side - Existing 1/2 R.O.W. = 33', Proposed = 60'; 15,600 sq.ft. East Side - Existing 1/2 R.O.W. = 50', Proposed = 60'; 5,200 sq.ft. Lexington Avenue south of Lone Oak Road: West Side - Existing 1/2 R.O.W. = 60', Proposed = 75'; 10,500 sq.ft. East Side - Existing 1/2 R.O.W. = 50', Proposed = 75'; • 17,000 sq.ft. Lone Oak Road east of Lexington Avenue North Side: Parcel 010-50 - Existing 1/2 R.O.W. = 33', Proposed = 75' 11,300 sq.ft. South Side - Existing 1/2 R.O.W. = 50', Proposed = 75' 30.500 sq.ft., TOTAL 90,100 sq.ft. The estimated cost for right-of-way acquistions are unknown at this time. • 49516.RPT 8., • AREA TO BE INCLUDED Listed below are the parcels proposed to be assessed which also abut the project: Section 2 (SW 114) Parcel 010-50 Eagandale Industrial Park No. 2 Parcel 151-00 Parcel 152-00 Bell Lexington Addition Lot 1, 2, 3, Block 1 Eagandale Center Industrial Park No. 2 Lot 13 Section 3 (SE 1/4) Parcel 010-77 • Parcel 020-77 Parcel 030-77 Parcel 040-77 Parcel 050-77 Eagandale Center Industrial Park No. 10 Lot 2, Block 1 Section 10 (NE 1/4) Eagandale Center Industrial Park No. 9 Lot 1, 2, Block 1 Lot 1, 2, Block 2 • Section 11 (NW 1/41 Parcel 010-25 Parcel 010-26 Eagandale Center Industrial Park No. 3 • Lot 1-10, Block 5 49516.RPT 9. c(2 • ASSESSMENTS Assessments are proposed to be levied against the benefited properties in accordance with assessment policies established in the City of Eagan. A preliminary assessment roll is incuded in Appendix A located at the back of this report. Assessments are separated into sanitary sewer/water service and streets. Sanitary sewer/water service is proposed to be assessed entirely to the benefited property they serve. Street is separated into three rate categories which are listed below: Overlay Rate (52' wide street) $10.40/F.F. Concrete Curb Rate $13.65/F.F. Street Surfacing w/Grading & Storm Sewer Commercial/Industrial Rate $104.95/F.F. • The determination of the overlay and concrete curb rate is presented in Appendix B. It's expected each of these rates will be revised based on final bid unit prices. The street surfacing rate with grading and storm sewer is included in the 1991 Fee Schedule for Eagan. Properties proposed to be assessed the overlay rate include those properties on Lexington Avenue and Lone Oak Road west of Lexington Avenue. In addition, the properties on Lexington Avenue north of Lone Oak Road are also proposed to be assessed the concrete curb rate because concrete curb does not exist north of Lone Oak Road. Properties on Lone Oak Road east of Lexington Avenue are proposed to be assessed the full rate for street surfacing with grading and storm sewer because total street reconstruction is proposed in this area. All properties are proposed to be assessed at their highest and best use which is considered com- 49516.RPT 10. s7 • mercial/industrial. Therefore, all property is proposed to be assessed as commercial/industrial property which reflects a 52' wide equivalent street as shown on Figure No. 4. REVENUE SOURCES As previously indicated, the City of Eagan and Dakota County will enter into a cost sharing agreement for this project. A summary of City/County cost allocations is presented in the following table: City of Eagan Dakota County (Percentage) (Percentage) Street (Grading, surfacing, utility reconstruction and restoration 45 55 Traffic Signal 0 100 Storm Sewer: Catch Basins & Catch Basin Leads 45 55 • All other 100 0 Sanitary Sewer/Water Main Adjustment 45 55 Sanitary Sewer and Water Service 100 0 ROW & Construction Easements 45 55 The costs for trails are shared between Dakota County and Eagan as follows: Reconstruction of existing trails/sidewalks will be the responsibility of Dakota County. The trail on the north side of Lone Oak Road east of Lexington Avenue will be 100% Dakota County. Trails on Lexington Avenue and south side of Lone Oak Road will be 100% Eagan. • 49516.RPT 11. • City of Eagan Dakota County Total Street $236,250 $288,750 $ 525,000 Traffic Signal --- 136,000 136,000 Bituminous Trail/Sidewalk 9,000 38,000 47,000 Storm Sewer Catch Basin & Leads 30,770 37,610 68,380 All Others 55,420 1,200 56,620 Sanitary Sewer/Water Main Adjustment 16,200 19,800 36,000 Sanitary Sewer/Water Service 8,000 --- 8,000 Right-of-way 90.000 11 0.000 200.000 TOTALS $445,640 $631,360 $1,077,000 Revenues from the proposed street and utility service assessments are listed below: Street $232,176 Sanitary Sewer & Water Service 8.000. TOTAL $240,176 Based on these assessments, a total of $205,464 ($445,640 -$240,176) will be required from the major street fund and trail dedication fund to cover the remaining City of Eagan share - for this project. • 49516.RPT 12. • JROJECT SCHEDULE Present Feasibility Report June 4, 1991 Public Hearing July 2, 1991 Approve Plans and Specifications July, 1991 Open Bids/Award Contract August, 1991 Complete Construction Fall, 1991 Assessment Hearing Summer, 1992 First Payment Due with Real Estate Taxes May, 1993 • 49516.RPT 13. L00 APPENDIX A PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL • LEXINGTON AVENUE & LONE OAK ROAD INTERSECTION RECONSTRUCTION/SIGNALIZATION • PROJECT NO. 601 I. SANITARY SEWER/WATER SERVICE Total Parcel Description Assessment, SECTION 2 (SW 1/4) Parcel 010-50 $4,000 EAGANDALE CENTER INDUSTRIAL PARK NO, 2 Lot 13 4.000 TOTAL $8,000 H. STREET Total Assessable Total Parcel Description Front Footage Footage Rate/F.F., Assesq SECTION 2 (SW 1/4) Parcel 010-50 269.72 269.72 $104.95 $28,307 EAGANDALE CENTER INDUSTRIAL PARK NO. 2 Parcel 151-00 260 260 24.05(1) 6,253 Parcel 152-00 601 90 24.05. 2,164 BELL LEXINGTON ADDITION Lot 1, Block 1 208 (Lone Oak) 208 104.95 $21,830 Lot 1 265 (Lexington) 190(2) 24.05 4,570 Lot 2 140.95 140.95 104.95 11,015 Lot 3 131.33 131.33 104.95 13,783 EAGANDALE CENTER INDUSTRIAL PARK NO. 2 Lot 13 190 110 104.95 $11.545 TOTAL $99,467 (1) Assessment Rate = Bituminous Overlay Rate + Concrete Curb Rate. (2) 75' Corner Lot Credit. (3) Assessment Rate = Bituminous Overlay Rate only. • 49516.RPT 14. � 1 Total Assessable Total • Parcel Description Front Footage Footage Rate/F.F. meat SECTION 3 (SE 1/4) Parcel 010-77 134 134 $ 24.05 $ 3,223 Parcel 020-77 208.71 208.71 24.05 5,019 Parcel 030-77 112 112 24.05 2,694 Parcel 040-77 4 114 114 24.05 2,742 P arcel 050-77 158.71 (Lexington) 158.71 24.05 3,817 Parcel 050-77 175.71 (Lone Oak) 100.71(2) 10.40(3) 1,047 EAGANDALE CENTER INDUSTRIAL PARK NO. 10 Lot 2, Block 1 468.24 $ 10.40 4.870 TOTAL $23,412 SECTION 10 (NE 1/4) EAGANDALE CENTER INDUSTRIAL PARK NO. 9 Lot 1, Black 1 165 165 $ 10.40 $ 1,716 Lot 2, Block 1 95 95 10.40 988 Lot 1, Block 2 492.24 (Lone Oak) 417.24(2) 10.40 4,339 Lot 1, Block 2 300.02 (Lexington) 300.02 10.40 3,120 410 Lot 2, Block 2 288.00 288.00 10.40 2.995 TOTAL $13,158 SECTION 11 (NW 1/4) Parcel 010-25 261.40 261.40 $ 10.40 $ 2,719 Parcel 010-26 435.6 30 10.40 312 EAGANDALE CENTER INDUSTRIAL PARK NO. 3 Lot 1, Block 5 100 100 $ 10.40 $ 1,040 Lot 2, Block 5 100 100 10.40 1,040 Lot 3, Block 5 250 (Lexington) 175(2) 10.40 1,820 Lot 3, Block 5 100 (Lone Oak) 100 104.95 10,495 Lot 4, Block 5 210 210 104.95 22,040 Lot 5, Block 5 100 100 . 104.95 10,495 Lot 6, Block 5 100 100 104.95 10,495 Lot 7, Block 5 100 100 104.95 10,495 Lot 8, Block 5 100 100 104.95 10,495 Lot 9, Block 5 100 100 104.95 10,495 Lot 10, Block 5 100 40 104.95 4,198 TOTAL $96,139 • 49516.RPT 15. SUMMARY PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL LEXINGTON AVENUE & LONE OAK ROAD INTERSECTION RECONSTRUCTION/SIGNALIZATION PROJECT NO. 601 Parcel Sanitary Sewer Total Description & Water Service Street SECTION 2 (SW 1/4) Parcel 010-50 $4,000 $ 28,307 $ 32,307 EAGANDALE CENTER INDUSTRIAL PARK NO. 2 Parcel 151-00 $ 6,253 6,253 Parcel 152-00 2,164 2,164 BELL LEXINGTON ADDITION Lot 1, Block 1 $ 26,400 $ 26,400 Lot 2 11,015 11,015 Lot 3 13,783 13,783. EAGANDALE CENTER INDUSTRIAL PARK NO. 2 Lot 13 $4,000 $ 11,545 $ 15,545 SECTION 3 (SE 1/4) Parcel 010-77 $ 3,223 $ 3,223 Parcel 020-77 5,019 5,019 Parcel 030-77 2,694 2,694 Parcel 040-77 2,742 2,742 Parcel 050-77 4,864 4,864 EAGANDALE CENTER INDUSTRIAL PARK NO. 10 Lot 2, Block 1 $ 4,870 $ 4,870 SECTION 10 (NE 1/4) EAGANDALE CENTER INDUSTRIAL PARK NO. 9 Lot 1, Block 1 $ 1,716 $ 1,716 Lot 2, Block 1 988 988 Lot 1, Block 2 7,459 7,459 Lot 2, Block 2 2,995 2,995 • 49516.RPT 16. � 3 • Parcel Sanitary Sewer Total Description & Water Service Street Assessment SECTION 11 (NW 1/4) Parcel 010-25 $ 2,719 $ 2,719 Parcel 010-26 312 312 EAGANDALE CENTER INDUSTRIAL PARK NO. 3 Lot 1, Block 5 $ 1,040 $ 1,040 Lot 2, Block 5 1,040 1,040 Lot 3, Block 5 12,315 12,315 Lot 4, Block 5 22,040 22,040 Lot 5, Block 5 10,495 10,495 Lot 6, Block 5 10,495 10,495 Lot 7, Block 5 10,495 10,495 Lot 8, Block 5 10,495 10,495 Lot 9, Block 5 10,495 10,495 Lot 10, Block 5 4,198 4.198 TOTAL $8,000 $232,176 $240,176 • • 49516.RPT 17. (.0 APPENDIX B ASSESSMENT RATE CALCULATION BITUMINOUS OVERLAY RATE (52' Wide Street) Rate/F.F. 0.20 Gal. Bituminous material for tack coat @ $1.50/gal. $ 0.31 0.30 Ton Bituminous wear course @ $14.00/ton 4.20 0.02 Ton Bituminous material for mixture @ $155.00/ton 3.10 $ 7.61 +5% Contingencies 0.38 $ 7.99 +30% Legal, Engrng., Admin. & Bond Interest 2.41 TOTAL $10.40 CONCRETE CURB RATE • Rate/F.F. 1 C.Y. Common excavation @ $2.00/C.Y. $ 2.00 1 L.F. Concrete curb & gutter @ $5.00/L.F. 5.00 2 S.Y. Sodding @ $1.50/S.Y. 3.00 $10.00 +5% Contingencies 0.50 $10.50 . +30% Legal, Engrng., Admin. & Bond Interest . 3.15 TOTAL $13.65 • 49516.RPT 18. MATCHLINE 9+75 0 1 � 1 C I v v r `' _ .°3 • i I 0 1 v r I ix r I I II I .----� Id 1 � Z 1 • CO `'F c • • v V —J • ++ i jo I • I Nt- o ' "' N C 0 •OD .. U a, N I 0 I`1 Clubview Dr / t"5":„( SS1 W ►, N , III { I I NJ I C UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS ti Ronestroo • • Rosen. EAGAN, MINNESOTA FIGURE 3 Anderiik a Associates LEXINGTON AVE.(C.R. 43) & LONE OAK ROAD(C.S.A.H. 43) Engfn..rs & Architects 2335 Waist Highway 90 49\49516\49516FA5 MAY 1991 ( ,c COMM. 49516 St. Paul. Minnesota 55113 1 � 1 s f t 1 at • . • I s. r ,., 1 0 p C O ' • r---- cI-- '0 • • ., • ox =0 I-, - 0 Li • 1 0 � 0 • I o T I I s � • • -- Z 1 I I :_ • J I - ,-1 r O O 1 1 * Z --,0 -0 • _ _ • 0 LLI \ • r • r- I L I _� c rr v r- 1 Lam, I I O I * _ I 1 I I 0 c +' c.... 0 '''''‘..........~..7�/ ; L 0 • •• • •// y rD ix (1) y •(f== . • . 41\ Lone Oak Rood i I MATCHLINE 9+75 UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS n Bonestroo a Rosen. 0 Anderlik EAGAN, MINNESOTA FIGURE 4 Associates LEXINGTON AVE.(C.R. 43) & LONE OAK ROAD(C.S.A.H. 43) Engineers Arshi 3 Ma 49\49516\49516FA6 MAY 1991 COMM.,i 49516 St. Pad, Afinn•sota 55113 MATCHLINE 100+75 1 of g CD __ , 1 D C i .- � 3 I I rI I r Ce C7 1 _Y 0 0 ®® ® c 0 III— 1 J 1 `/ CD_ �' N I �®__ CD 4ci 40 v) 0 0 J 3 _, 0, 43 (Lexington Ave)* s — _s----=)— s— o i, 00 L� • 3 ( CID • I • ...11 I • i I _ MATCHLINE 92+75 UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS 4 i I Bonestroo w Rosen Alk il Anderiik EAGAN, MINNESOTA FIGURE 6 Associates LEXINGTON AVE.(C.R. 43) & LONE OAK ROAD(C.S.A.H. 43) Engineers Architects 49\49516\49516A MAY 1991 to COMM. 49516 West H igh a 35 St. Pad, Minnesota U Co •1 1 1 I •I o • t i .�W + 8 D V I C O N N '__...._-Z----. sf 5 1 l , w..." N `� 5 - '0 y , 1 C(!) —1 / - 0 E 2 7 I PAl9 5UO4SWJV 118N El_) Ce ti 43 I O O cA c II J 01 v 6 N 1 0 ,. U w tli-17.. CD 0 — r WNW N I -Th M a(I) 1 Ciit ---'4) . A 1 t i J 1�1 T MATCHLINE 100+75 UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS n Bonestroo • e Rosene yi Anderilk & EAGAN, MINNESOTA FIGURE 7 Associates LEXINGTON AVE.(C.R. 43) & LONE OAK ROAD(C.S.A.H. 43) Engineers a Architects 2335 Most Highway 38 49\49516\49516FA4 MAY 1991 1 COMM. 49516 St. Paul, Minnesota 55113 EAGANDALE CENTER INDUSTRIAL PARK No. 9 fr .Y 0 0 v I I 2 0 1 m I( 050-77 040-77 030_777 020-77 010-77 I I 288' 300.02' ° ': 1 115 ' 114' L-4--1-2' 101.5S' 134':..:_ 288 J` ., J` . - _ A :� s = , r '1265' `160' 19d�. 261�4�� 100' 100' 250' 1$1-00 151-�00 152-00 �I 010-25 1 2 3 i ° �' 75' C.L.C. 75' C.L.C. ° EAGAN DALE CENTER INDUSTRIAL PARK No. 3 LEGEND IIIVENE =ASSESSABLE FOOTAGE Z_�„_ 75' C.L.C. =CORNER LOT CREDIT o goo zoo Seale in feet C.R. 43(LEXINGTON AVENUE) EAGANDALE CENTER INDUSTRIAL PARK No. 10 75' C.L.C. BELL „. O 2 J osq •4 LE) ING ON 2 468 20' I :I 1 200' • s DITI ON - _. 90 95 -_ -------w. 0 _ : Agenda Information Memo • July 16, 1991, City Council Meeting RECONSIDER FINAL ASSMT - MT CALVARY CHURCH B. Project 584, Reconsider Final Assessment - Mt. Calvary Church (Rahn Road Reconstruction)--On June 18, the final assessment hearing was held for Project 584 which provided for the reconstruction of Rahn Road. During that hearing, representatives of Mt. Calvary Lutheran Church requested Council consideration of a portion of their frontage being assessed at the Single-Family rate as it pertains to the parsonaje in lieu of the Public Facility rate associated with the church itself. Enclosed on page ? is a site plan showing the relationship of the parsonage, church, parking lots and driveway approaches to Rahn Road indicating that approximately 210' of frontage could be reasonably assigned to the parsonage usage. Enclosed on pages /3 through 7 5 is a review provided by the City Attorney's Office pertaining to assessing a single legally described fully zoned parcel at two different rates. This parcel was originally proposed to be assessed in the following manner: 589.43 ff @ $75.16/ff = $44,301.56 If it is determined that the northern portion of this parcel attributed to the parsonage should be assessed at the Single-Family rate, the assessment calculation is identified as follows: 210 ff @ $30.79/if = $ 6,465.90 379.43 ff @ $75.16/ff = 28,517.96 Total $34,983.86 It would be appropriate for the City Council to consider this policy question so that the proper final assessment amount can be certified to Dakota County. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To close the public hearing for Project 584 (Rahn Road Reconstruction) as it pertains to Parcel 10-02000-010-28 (Mount Calvary Lutheran Church) and approve the original/modified assessment roll and authorize its certification to Dakota County. • ■ 1 EASEMENT DESCRIPTION SKETCH FORT CITY OF EAGAN i ` el NS9•19'oe'E •2900 -- W no N \ Z• �I 7 Z�1 C 10 \ . , - N \ el ett A a s-F \ o \ , ■ \ ' . . ` C \ \ ... ief:: — — 1 L 1 \ /11 t (2.:1 PARKING 4t.+rn r ; v Xi iri * C 2 0 CHvRCH :I x t C b 1_ • i L.; r-- 4 01,1 z.,..., r (1:. - ----- �• / \ AT d,[ # �,d,p ;;F'` SCALE IN FEET I - �� ' '� /00 so 0.1..11111111111M1/00.1111.1111111111111.111:0 •r I n I �n L 1 w N I�ww.� II awed Rw�-ve•�iwr•.. . C.1+.d Kr ro--•� ( w r. n -� �r w��•r+�.� a■yr. w.• Mme•rta M w.0 \H.A M .rt-•Ar P. I r r • 93 JUL 12 '91 10:57 325 P02 SEVERSON,WILCOX& SHELDON, P.A. • . A PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATION ATTORNEYS AT LAW LARRY S SEVERRON• JAMES F.SHELI)ON KENNETH IL HALL J. PATRICK WILC:OX• 600 MmWAY NATIONAL BANK BUILDING "•FOOT.D.JOHNsTON MICHAEL C DOUORERTY 7300 WEST 147TH STREET WREN M.SOLFFST MICHAEL E. MOLENDA•• APPLE VALLEY,MINNESOTA 66124 CHRISTINE M. SCOTILLO (612) 432.3136 ANNETTE M. MARGARIT DANIFI.M. SHEIUDAN TELEFAX NUMBER 432.3760 SHARON IL HILLS •AL.go 1JC.ENSED IN IOWA ••AL80 UCEN91[D ua WW C)NSIN t>FtxXAYSEL ••.ALSO LT( NSED IN N21312A a • "OWN E.VUKk UCH July 12, 1991 City of Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Road P.O. Box 21199 Eagan, Minnesota 55122-1897 Attn: Thomas A. Colbert, Director of Public Works Re: Project 584 Rahn Road Final Assessment Roll Parcel 10-02000-010-28 Our file #206-7908 Dear Tom: In response to your letter of June 26, 1991 regarding the g g proposed assessment against Mount Calvary Lutheran Church, we provide the following comments. First, with regard to the issue treating all similarly situated properties similarly, this rule of law is applicable on an individual project by project basis. In other words, parcels of property being assessed under a public project as being public facilities, do not have to be assessed at the same rate or using the same formula on any future projects, but rather, all public facility property affected by the same public project must be treated similarly. Additionally, while it has been the City policy to assess properties based upon the zoning classification upon any appeal from an assessment, it is our position and the one taken by all appraisers, that the affected property needs to be viewed in its highest and best use for purposes of identifying whether or not the project has increased the value of the property. Therefore, use is an integral part of the assessment policy. Should the Council chose to amend the assessment roll for the Mount Calvary Church with respect to the Rahn Road improvement, our review would find justification in that there appears to be presently two uses taking place on one tax parcel. This is certainly a legitimate • /71 q' . _._..._... - ..._ .. _ . JUL 12 '91 10:57 325 P03 i Page Two July 12, 1991 Thomas A. Colbert, Director of Public Works basis for the Council to utilize different rates as it applies to the front footage of the parcel in question. The one caveat to such an assessment would require a determination that there are no other public facility properties affected by the Rahn Road improvement which contain both a single family residence and a facility for public services. If you have any questions regarding any matter contained herein, please give me a call. Sincerely, SEVERSON, COX & SHELDON, P.A. ohael G. Dou. P GD/pjk cc: Tom H=dg= , C, y Administrator Jim Sh- don, ity Attorney Gene VanOverbeke, City Finance Director 5...;/ Agenda Information Memo • July 16, 1991 City Council Meeting PM BUSINESS SPECIAL USE PERMIT/STEININGER CONSTRUCTION CONCRETE RECYCLING A. Special Use Permit, Steininger Construction,to Allow Continued Concrete Recycling in a LI (Limited Industrial) Zoned District, Located West of Highway 149, south of Yankee Doodle Road in the NW 1/4 of Section 13--An application has been received of Steininger Construction for a special use permit to allow continued operation of their concrete recycling activities at the corner of Highway 149 and Yankee Doodle Road. For additional information with respect to this application, please refer to the Community Development Department staff report which is enclosed on pages 77 througrif for your review. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny a special use permit for Steininger Construction to allow continuation of their concrete recycling operation in an LI (Limited Industrial) district as presented. • • SUBJECT: SPECIAL USE PERMIT (RENEWAL) APPLICANT: STEININGER CONSTRUCTION • LOCATION: NW 3/4 OF SECTION 13 EXISTING ZONING: PD-LI (PLANNED DEVELOPMENT-LIGHT INDUSTRIAL) DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: JULY 16, 1991 DATE OF REPORT: JULY 1, 1991 COMPILED BY: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT APPLICATION SUMMARY: An application has been submitted requesting a Special Use Permit renewal to allow for the continued use of 3.5 acres of undeveloped industrial land for a concrete recycling, processing, and stockpiling facility located west of Highway 149, south of Yankee Doodle Road in the NW V of Section 13. COMMENTS: The applicant initially received City Council approval for this use on July 18, 1989, subject to annual review, as well as other conditions which have been met. The applicant's permit was renewed by the Council on July 10, 1990. Staff is not aware of any complaints regarding this operation in the past two years. 410 The operation involves importing rubble concrete. When the concrete has accumulated to 20,000 cubic yards, a crushing plant is brought to the site to reduce the rubble to reusable class 5 aggregate. The operation utilizes approximately one acre of the 3.5-acre site owned by Gopher Smelting. If renewed, this Special Use Permit shall be subject to the following conditions: 1. Dust control procedures shall be utilized. 2. Hours of operation shall be limited to 7:00 AM to 7:00 PM, Monday through Saturday. 3. The operation shall be subject to an annual review. If renewal is denied, the applicant will be provided with a six-month notice for termination. , ! . ,___,....___AgTor'...._. ::„... - 1 s;tTi i \ s 0 . ; NE 0 CLO•ivi[[T! NW w E /. .e7e-ArriC74 . _.. . . ip +.-,` ,-. "J'i •t., • - t..r,.. * , lr -Au .uiw IIE i i• c� .- t• \I._ • © ` f _ • ...•... . 1►. f to-- .,- — `tt.� 1 .11,i - '°Mg 0011.61 1 1,17 At 4,„.,- .5...r.: pilli 2,1i , ...... ..... .,,,,,,,o.,IP...IL w ay - M E. •-2-:-_ . -_4._ _ J_•ti: LPL. `�'� • . Zor CS 14%4 I tall CA= yam ,•• • al ressvir,411•111&71iiiir [n • -� a, MC:1.11 • r ,. • _ I ,. � 2,. ,....„-....74.r.r.. ,., 4 ii I •te.••1 11111 .'"91- •.RSCOr• - � . i k / ' ..0.:;4...._.• . D.41 ■• I ` .--.1 111 to.y K�\-1,--- 7 It r 61Att)e. rJ 9 jam. ,�..rir- ..- . - ! ` Iali" C iii -6 _:__ .1-Fir a —,. _ j�, - 1 P .•_ 1 iI.J 11 .. • -�� - -_-- -- - - - r- - ----- --- - • M O a E r o ��+w �a'• v.rw.4..4AMAIIv�wwwww+v-u.a.-1"..a.,-mimm• Mg.....:::::::::::::::::::::: •::::::::.....................°: E:O^ •• illt re j i g V a . i= O N e' n 0 till. .-- i I li0 a I i 1 g 0 J . } e !, i i : . 1 ' , A ,0 .. .... : , W iiii, ts• A y €—,...., •, O V Z 3 1 x ISIS. B • M• _, — ___. - - tunic • .O. • —__-.• -- f Agenda Information Memo • July 16, 1991 City Council Meeting RECREATIONAL FACILITY COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION ICE ARENA/SWIMMING POOL PROJECT B. Direction Regarding Recreational Facility Committee Recommendation to Proceed with Ice Arena/Swimming Pool Project—The City Administrator is preparing a memorandum outlining information pertinent to the Council's July 2 request that the Recreational Facility Committee's recommendation with respect to the ice arena/swimming pool project be placed on the July 16 agenda. This memorandum will be distributed on Monday with Additional Information. The memo will outline a number of policy issues remain to be addressed to permit this item to move forward in a timely manner. Depending upon the Council's direction with respect to these public policy issues, a number of different actions may be appropriate at Tuesday's meeting. In particular, the Council may wish to set a referendum date and give direction to staff to address certain of the public policy issues along a time line to meet that referendum date or address the public policy issues with direction to staff to develop these issues further before setting a referendum date or to direct staff to develop additional information relative to the public policy issues and report back to the Council prior to Council's discussion of those issues. While the Council may choose any of these potential actions, it is essential that staff be given sufficient specific direction to develop the information the Council desires in as timely a manner as possible because of the time frames inherent in this matter. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To provide appropriate direction regarding the Recreational Facility Committee's recommendation to proceed with the ice arena/swimming pool project with respect to the identified public policy issues,development of additional information and/or setting a referendum date. • • Agenda Information Memo July 16, 1991 City Council Meeting 1991 TRAILER PERMITS C. Renewals, 1991 Trailer Permits--Enclosed on page 'mss a memorandum from the Finance Department relative to the 1991 - 1992 trailer permit renewals. The Council will recall that each of these permits was reviewed in detail in 1990. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the trailer permit renewals for 1991 1992 as presented. 0 July 10, 1991 TO: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES FROM: ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT WITT RE: 1991-92 TRAILER PERMIT RENEWALS Applications for trailer permit renewels have been received by City staff, with the except of Steven Isaacson. The status of the trailers remains ;h the same as last year. B & F Distributing dba Tripp Oil Continues to utilize their 3085 Sibley Memorial Highway trailer as an office with no change anticipated. Alwin & Lyle Schultz Maintain the trailer for 1315 Carriage Hills Drive family member use on an intermittent basis. Earl Marotzke 535 Gun Club Road Continues to maintain a trailer at this address. 410 Marvin & Verene Fritz Continues to reside in the 4580 East Greenleaf Drive trailer with no indication that a house is to be con- structed on the site. City records for June 3, 1980, show that Mr. Fritz was given a one-year mobile home permit with the proviso that the single family home would be built and the mobile home removed. The trailer permit has been renewed in subsequent years. Steven Isaacson This property, which is owned 3660 Dodd Road by Mr. Isaacson, was formerly leased by American Homes which had a trailer utilized as a sales office. American Homes no longer leases the property. Mr. Isaacson has two trailers on his property. It looks as if someone lives in one of the trailers:and the use for the other couldn't be determined on a "drive by" inspection. The applicants have been notified that their renewals will be considered at the July 16, 1991 meeting. gad- Agenda Information Memo July 16, 1991, City Council Meeting APPROVE COUNTY COST PARTICIPATION AGMT #26-16 & TRAFFIC SIGNAL AGMT #91-07 (LEXINGTON AVE & LONE OAK RD) D. Project 601, Approve County Cost Participation Agreement #26-16 & Traffic Signal Agreement #91-07 (Lexington Avenue & Lone Oak Road - Intersection Reconstruction & Signalization)--With the continuation of the public hearing for Project 601 on the July 2 Council meeting, consideration of approving the Cost Participation & Traffic Signal Agreements with Dakota County necessary to cooperate with this improvement had to also be continued to the July 16 meeting. Therefore, if Project 601 is approved under the Public Hearing portion of this agenda, it would be appropriate for the Council to approve both agreements. They have been reviewed by the Public Works Department and City Attorney's Office and found to be in order for favorable Council action. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve County Cost Participation Agreement #26-16 and Traffic Signal Agreement #91-07 (Lexington Avenue & Lone Oak Road-Intersection Reconstruction&Signalization)and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute all related documents. CONSIDER CONTRACT AWARD (OAKS OF BRIDGEWATER 2ND ADDN) E. Contract 91-04, Consider Contract Award (Oaks of Bridgewater 2nd Addition - • Streets & Utilities)--At 11:30 a.m. on Friday, May 31, formal bids were received for the installation of streets and utilities under Contract 91-04 for the Oaks of Bridgewater 2nd Addition. Enclosed on page �z is a tabulation of those bids received. The contract was Co not awarded at the July 2 Council meeting due to the fact that the final P lat for this subdivision was not ready for formal Council approval. Subsequently, it was continued to allow the developer to continue with his final plat processing. The bid specifications require the low bidder to guarantee his prices for a period of 45 days from the date of the bid opening. This time period expires on July 15. However, the contractor has agreed to extend his prices through July 16 to allow the contract to be awarded if the final plat has been approved. Therefore, if the final plat is not approved earlier on the agenda, it would be appropriate for the Council to reject the bids and cancel the contract. If, however, the final plat is approved earlier on the agenda, it would be appropriate for the Council to receive the bids and award the contract. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve/cancel Contract 91-04 (Oaks of Bridgewater 2nd Addition) to Burschville Construction Company in the amount of $323,573.74 and, if approved, authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute all related documents. • g3 OAKS OF BRIDGEWATER 2ND ADDITION 7ROJECT #610 CONTRACT #91-04 SAGAN. MN. BID TIME: 11:30 a.m. BID DATE: FRIDAY, KAY 31, 1991 CONTRACTORS TOTAL BASE BID 1. Burschville, Const. $ 323,573.74 2 . Ryan Cont. 340,966.53 3 . Nodland 344,715.30 4 . Rice Lake Cont. 353,409.00 5. Excel Utilities 355,280.05 6. F.F. Jedlicki, Inc. 374 ,812.50 7. Northdale Const. 403,484.15 8. Widmer Inc. 415,238.85 1 • 9. Landwehr Heavy Moving 444 ,713.75 10. Brown and Cris 453,659.80 11. Arcon Const. 512,691.92 LOW BID $ 323,573.74 Feasibility Report Estimate $ 395,000.00 Engineer's Estimate • 396,340.00 • % Over (+) Under (-) F.A. - 18% % Over (+) Under (-) E.E. - 11% g (-1 Agenda Information Memo July 16, 1991, City Council Meeting • CONSIDER CONTRACT AWARD (WILLBROOK ADDN). F. Contract 91-05,Consider Contract Award Willbrook Addition-Streets&Utilities)-- At 11:00 a.m. on Friday, June 28, formal bids were received for the installation of streets and utilities to service the Willbrook Addition under Contract 91-05. Enclosed on page y‘ is a tabulation of those bids received. However, the contract was not able to be considered for contract award at the July 2 Council meeting due to the fact that the final plat for this subdivision was not ready for formal Council approval. Subsequently, this contract award consideration was continued to a later date. If the final plat approval for the Willbrook Addition is in order for Council approval earlier on the agenda, it would be appropriate to consider contract award at this time. If the final plat is not in order for consideration on this agenda, this contract award should again be continued to a later date. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To receive the bids and approve/continue contract award for Contract 91-05 (Willbrook Addition - Streets & Utilities) and, if approved, authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute all related documents. • J WILLBROOR ADDITION • PROJECT NO. 613 • CONTRACT NO. 91-05 FOR THE CITY OF EAGAN, MINNESOTA BID TIME:11:00 A.M. C.S.D.T BID DATE:FRIDAY, JUNE 28, 1991 CONTRACTORS TOTAL BASE BID 1. RYAN CONTRACTING, INC. $ 93,219.40 2 . MACHTEMES CONSTRUCTION 94,160.30 3 . EXCEL UTILITIES 99,190.50 4 . RO SO 130,825.00 • LOW BID $ 93,219.40 Feasibility Report Estimate $100,000.00 Engineer's Report Estimate $100,000.00 % Over (+) Under (-) F.R. -6.8% % Over (+) Under (-) E.E. -6.8% • • Agenda Information Memo • July 16, 1991 City Council Meeting airSONSIngii CITY CODE INTERPRETATION/LIMITED INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT A. Interpretation of Similar Uses in a Light Industrial (LI) District--A request has been received of Opus Corporation with respect to the Armstrong Business Center I building for an interpretation of City Code to determine whether a medical clinic and an occupational therapy clinic are permitted uses under the code or are substantially similar to permitted uses such that they could be located in that facility. For additional information with respect to this request, please re er to the Community Development Department staff report which is enclosed on pages $J through Gp for your review. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To interpret the City Code with respect to permitted uses within a limited industrial district to determine whether a medical clinic and occupational therapy clinic are permitted or substantially similar. • • � 7 MEMORANDUM • TO: DALE C RUNKLE, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR FROM: MIKE RIDLEY, PROJECT PLANNER DATE: JULY 10, 1991 RE: ARMSTRONG BUSINESS CENTER I OPUS CORPORATION Opus Corporation has negotiated leases with a medical clinic (Health One) and an occupational therapy clinic (Spectrum Physical Therapy) for space totaling 9,000 sq. ft. in the Armstrong Business Center I building. Robert Worthington of Opus needs assurances from the City that such uses are permitted in the Light Industrial zoning district in order to finalize the lease documents. Although offices and numerous service uses are permitted in the Light Industrial zoning district, medical clinics for human care are not specifically defined in the City Code. In order to ensure these new businesses will locate in the City,we must have this clarified by the City Council eliminating any misunderstanding so this project can move forward. If you have any questions, please advise. Project Planner MJR/js 110 • (f) The front side of the building or structure shall be determined by the applicant. The front yard shall consist of the area between the designated front side and the lot lines on said side bounded by parallel lines extending from the approximate corners of the designated side to the lot line (s) . (g) A permit for a building or structure in excess of the normal maximum height limitations shall not be allowed if the building or structure is located less than 300 feet from a single family residential district as measured from the nearer` point of such building or structure to the nearest point of the residential district. (h) Special review and considera- tion will be given to proposed buildings or structures that take advantage of significant topographical changes in ele- vations that would minimize the impact of the structures top floor elevation in relation to single family residential dwellings in the area. Source: No. 52 Amendment Effective Date: 4-27-82 Subd. 16 . I-1 Limited Industrial District. A. Permitted Uses. Within any "I-1" Dis- trict, no structure or land shall be used except for one or more of the following uses or uses deemed similar by the Council : 1. Conducting a process, fabrication, storage or manufacturing light materials or wholesaling operation or providing a service including any of the fol- lowing or similar uses meeting the performance standards applicable to the "I-1" District: 2. Automobile painting, upholstering, tire recapping, and major repair when conducted completely in an enclosed building. 3. Ice, cold storage plants, bottling works. 4. Offices. 5. Machine and welding shops. 6. Paper products. 7 . Tennis club, skating , theater , bowling alley or similar indoor commercial recreation. 8 . Radio and television. • 9 . Restaurants - Class I only. 10 . Research laboratories. 11. Trade school. 12. Warehousing and wholesaling and related sales or showrooms. (1-1-83) 13. Storage yards for building materials provided they are suitably screened. • 14. Armories or convention hall. 15. Animal hospital or clinic (with no outside kennels) . Source: Ordinance No. 52 Effective Date: 4-25-75 16. Amusement devices not to exceed three machines at one licensed location and which shall not be located within 200 feet of another licensed location. For this purpose the outside wall of each licensed location shall be used in the measurement of the distance between locations. Source: No. 52 Amendment Effective Date: 8-8-80 B. Performance Standards. Applicants for building permits in the "I-1" District shall submit such evidences as may be required by the Building Inspector to assure compliance with the performance standards and the intent and purpose of the Limited Industrial District ("I- 1") . Should the Building Inspector have any doubt as to the ability of any proposed use to meet the required standard the matter shall be referred to the Planning Commissi which shall make a recommendation to the Council to grant or deny the application. C. Conditional Uses. Within the "I-1" District, no structure or land shall be used for the follow- ing uses or uses deemed similar by the Council except by Conditional Use Permit: 1. Open sales lots. 2. Truck and freight terminals. 3. Contractor's yards. 4. Explosives, including all activities involving the storage, utilization or manufacture of materials or products such as TNT or dynamite which could decompose by detonation. 5. Open storage (primary and secondary use) . 6. Sales yards for buildings materials. 7. Sales and service for trucks or passenger cars. 8. Rental lots. 9. Dog kennels with outside pens ad subject to Section 6.38 of the City Code. 10. Car or truck wash. 11. Truck stops. ck76 (1-1-83) 3] ' • § 11 . 20 12 . Motor fuel sales. Source : Ordinance No. 52 Effective Date : 4-25-75 13. Amusement devices exceeding three machines at one licensed location or to be located within 500 feet of any other licensed location. Source : No. 52 Amendment Effective Date: 8-8-80 14 . On-sale wine and 3 . 2 beer . Source: Ordinance No. 7 , 2nd Series Effective Date : 4-27-84 D. Additional Lot Requirements. 1. Not more than thirty-five (35 ) percent of the lot area shall be occupied by building (s) . Source : Ordinance No. 52 Effective Date: 4-25-75 2. Whenever an "I-1" District abuts an Agricultural, Residential or Public Facilities District, a fence or compact evergreen hedge not less than six (6) feet in height, except adjacent to a street where it shall be not less than three (3) or more than four (4) feet, shall be erected and maintained in the front portion of the lot, along the side and rear property line that abuts said Agricultural, Residential or Public Facilities District whenever buildings or parking is located within 200 feet of said District. Source : Ordinance No. 7 , 2nd Series Effective Date: 4-27-84 3. Whenever an I-1" District is across the street from an "R", "A", or a "P" District, the front or side yard adjacent to the street shall be landscaped and have a minimum depth of one hundred (100) feet. 410 4. Loading docks , truck parking, or open storage shall not be permitted on the side of an "I-1" District abutting an Agricultural, Residential or Public Facilities District. °Uc e 1-- ..\\, • ,, -11 .._ e - MI 7'7 • - -..■-...- •f 4 1111VI ihri IA ...-122.62..., .. _.....A IL l. ,.., - Or 011r tit "ilk ( Inv 4,,, . . , ww Nei. • .e.4.1:4:"1-4,•„, .. • - •, - L „..,,_ . :-. ,,,,-........ ... .. _. _ _..•...t __SI - • ._ . •I 1 f:libe . .1. . _i - -.i i t-.'4"..e •:-...... • 04. R - "%. . ) _t f 13 104 _lb 11 - . ;t. •!), •ita ■-I je 2 3; l f lilliCtorikaqt, 0 . Az 1 :ow - 74. . SI , IA r \ . ri 42 1.. , OV2,,, f \ N l' ., !''''' . • .. N ./ , i , .:1 Ka Of P __r _ ...,.., .. c ,, ..... 44 ',fly° • , ill _—_ ,: t• 'neo i ................_ztaix 1 , '> ■-\:._--..: ' c....■•■•••. '• .. . • IL -----1 . .,..---‘,-----i - iw-`),Cx ...(.;=-.. . , b, tit I, • ' ' ''' e),,-/ • -- 7-ID-- @ il f . ■ 2 1 cl t r_71i. ,.. ' . _ ti • 5512 1 or,1 au... . 1 , /Xe ,.IMMO at \ . . NI . f•DIIIC 2 PI SW 4.now met* Cti S•IIKORRIOC L III I i _. ........-... .. - . • 0 Ci 2......... . /0 C>eAll 0 14 AOPUS CORPORATION ♦` DESIGNERS•CONTRACTORS•DEVELOPERS 5 BOO Opus Center Mailing Address • 9900 Bren Road East P.O. Box 150 Minnetonka, Minnesota 55343 Minneapolis, Minnesota 55440 (612)936-4444 Fax(612)936-4529 July 3, 1991 Mr. Dale Runkle Community Development Director City of Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55122-1897 Dear Mr. Runkle: Opus Corporation has successfully negotiated leases with Health One's United Occupational Health, a medical clinic, and Spectrum Physical Therapy, an occupational therapy clinic, for space totaling 9,000 square feet in Armstrong Business Center I. These companies were specifically looking for an industrial environment to develop an occupational health clinic and rehabilitation area for those injured on the job. However, before signing and executing lease documents for these valued new businesses in Eagan, we need assurances that their uses are permitted in the underlying L1 Light Industrial zoning district which covers the • Armstrong Business Center I building. Our interpretation is that these work related clinics are permitted uses in the L1 zone. Does your interpretation agree with ours? If you are unsure, then we would appreciate having the matter referred to the City Council for their interpretation and endorsement. You will recall we followed a similar process with Knox Lumber and Lyman Lumber before they became excellent business additions to our Eagandale Park. Since we will be appearing before the City Council at its July 16 meeting on public improvement project #601 , as a convenience we would appreciate having this item considered by the Council at that same meeting. Call me if you have questions or need for any additional information. Best regards, ACC Robert A. Worthingin, AICP Executive Director — Governmental Affairs RAW/km Affiliated Companies: Opus U.S.Corporation,Opus Architects and Engineers,Inc.,Opus North Corporation,Opus South Corporation,Opus Southwest Corporation, Normandale Properties Inc.,Opus Properties Inc. Chicago•Milwaukee•Minneapolis•Tampa•Pensacola•Phoenix•San Diego•Seattle 93 Agenda Information Memo July 16, 1991 City Council Meeting • SPECIAL PERMIT/OPUS CORPORATION/BUSINESS IDENTIFICATION SIGN B. Special Permit, Opus Corporation, to Allow a Business Identification Sign at Lot 6-13, Block 5, Eagandale Center Industrial Park #3 Located Along the South Side of Lone Oak Road, West of Neil Armstrong Boulevard--An application has been received of Opus Corporation requesting a special permit to allow a 3' X 6'business identification monument sign at the western portion of the Lone Oak Business Center. For additional information with respect to this application, please refer the Community Development Department staff report which is enclosed on pages ors through q 7 for your review. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny a special permit for Opus Corporation to allow a business identification sign at the Lone Oak Business Center as presented. • • c(q SUBJECT: SPECIAL PERMIT APPLICANT: OPUS CORPORATION LOCATION: LOTS 6-13, BLOCK 5, EAGANDALE CENTER INDUSTRIAL PARK #3 EXISTING ZONING: LI (LIGHT INDUSTRIAL) DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: JULY 16, 1991 DATE OF REPORT: JULY 8, 1991 COMPILED BY: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT APPLICATION SUMMARY: An application has been submitted requesting a Special Permit to allow the placement of a 3' x 6' business identification monument sign for the Minnesota State Lottery in the second, or westerly phase of the Lone Oak Business Center. The building is located at the SW intersection of Lone Oak Road and Neil Armstrong Boulevard. Last year the City approved a similar Special Permit request allowing Massey Ferguson to have their own identification sign at the Armstrong Business Center directly to • the east. Massey Ferguson and the State Lottery will occupy approximately one-fourth of each building. The applicant feels that an interior lighted sign would improve customer visibility, especially those travelling eastbound on Lone Oak Road. The sign will be located west of the existing access onto Lone Oak Road. This will be the only sign exception for the Phase II portion of the complex and it will be reserved for the use of the Minnesota State Lottery only during their lease term in the building. If approved, this Special Permit shall be subject to: 1. The monument sign shall only be allowed while the Minnesota State Lottery is a tenant in the Phase II Lone Oak Business Center. 2. All signage shall be subject to the one-time sign fee of$2.50 per square feet. 3. All other applicable Codes. • C(/( ma. flit* lit vi, 95, c c 0 -73 P. 7;6 4 g ni a• ut r. an ). It ,7 14 461•d to .... ... . < Z... ••C C\s iC•ili/P i e•g&D6 ZZC p 0.-1>Z...•• la •..• • " ar '' V 6.z.. •IjitiZ7. ' Z 0 et >-1-i g . ... 7.- a AaLv m ,mmmit .. .. 2 2 - 1,,,,- " •.: 7 " - i./5 . cri • r Y',04'f, -c,0 -< 0 • • - "Cl Z < " 4:_e ,,,k44,'..kra -. •,...-.ti. 11111"4r C ... ... c• 0 so 0 Z •12 9 • it .. "7. V 0=, • Z -I Xit P•I A. • • • 1•4.• a . I 1- c I . (et., • > r 70 fl) g" .4 a. a. . ... 7•• D. n ta a ...... . .--.-7-- '7....; .--■ -. ire: .... . ... • .. ...— _. '. . • .....-.. -----•.---- .-..., - :.-,,,,,--, . '.',,,--..F.4-1V,;,---:•1.-- „-.:,At.`"-•;-...ti,,t'iv4;:iFi'...-..4,i .--c.; - 1- 1 . . . 't .....- ..1-e3'..:f....., 4 klf..s-'','•'...-'4'...f...;44re-''.1.?...S.V‘tW 44 ,),•••!•';-/-..t.it - 41i.....;L.,'..ik,rt-':.r.7.,;;;',?t,l,..."3..-Ji.i....4,4.3,74%.,c'--. ^. • . `1-,,t, 4It..'-.,, ''1, , R ..i.-- 1,1 •szt6.4-_-::4:1'7.- -,.-...4-..*-1,-$!.*,'...•..--,,,..,..::::;..-;:.74,512: ---1•..-z-5r-.5.1,4*..:", •-^.•:,-i:refir-'-•r::-i:•$-Y*-,..1.::••1.;--'.:.,"•--,:lrii4:-.%.tN.-..--7:ser?-'.:•••71....•.--P-..-*-4... "-. . _*-:;#6:t....--;;:-. ,....W,„. .„:::/,:;•,..-7.,..-...;;;;..:-.1.,.3!"..sronc41.:.:;---1-;;.!-.'4,../4t..-.=:.:.!:...k..,..::44'.......:::..f-1""?•.ix,-----'-..1a4!i'...-A;.-=:...C".e.=1e4:.•-_-,;/, _(.1 - .17•!,?,-.1.-:%A.- •-.7 ??..:;tt.1 ..,...t‘ .%.,4z...:::...:.::•.r.,-_!,-.:.-..z....-.,-...4..,•,..T:',.,-•-.'in-.:..„-•:!:"..":,::,-;-2-2'...i...-"i'••■•',t•;:-.2•-•.---••••l':-1.4...Z.-.....::1-•-....f-:-i-:".--el.-;!-.1-;',..,,i..16'-'t.;;Y:'7"..e.%:•,,471,!--et,..1••,...,. -...$/!...,::.•.-:1,0y. IN,e4:._ ;14-g..‘4:,,.1:',7,;.--•:-.."..1't....-1•-•.i.".....-1.7.-.--; -...-:'"'---•.- --...-";:i:-,--....;.?•,.'''.--,1"t:•,.•'.--4;..■;"!t‹,j-....,,i':.'..--._-•-...!•:-t,••:• -,..,:.•;---..fe..t-.',...;:,:;--'----t....;N:-'F'...`tg.''..: '."6"'TeetC"Tlit• &' G_''''. 'IC..1::sr.--;,...f.;a:L.:Z.-Z. "1:•:-..- ...";,'•- -..-- •.-..--...... _,-_.2'.•,.`'-,-.7-:.•,-.:1•Zr'-fa-C.t--.••-'.c..r.' ":••-4.....7 t.r1.T.---">-.......--.C...;•-•-;,;....-,:3::-..-1'...-Z-:,..T...r.e.C....'-',"‘.1: ..-='!"-,f44,-:.4...44-- ,itt.4. •-::„.""., - . .:-.........:t+.:7"•-•-•- - .....r...'.•- " ----' '--.:-;-•"-z-n.-'.--1--.,-:- e•-'4,:fr-:-..."..,"!........,---..-'....4.,:■.,',,•-•I fl",;.:14.'..t.."!..1,::1 itii.A•414r..x.P.-4,447,i-i.t,I.A1r.I.; "If-t. •:.....:---,;.::,....7. 1:.:".f,.2.1r,!-4..:-.4.'.1•1;t1-' 7••••,..r....1-...r",sar .4'-Vir-'-"'''i:::;:-.V...;,..;:i."441.I.: '..*.t, "‘.'tt.-■-...1.,e"(:.''''''.....7,.-';;...i. .--,;!:.••' ..?..-7".L . t',.-It - 7.""-''If,: ;i,.:-....-:- "..',"... '1'2. - V.:!"-.=,. ■-••Vi'. .. eli.17,44, ....Lt., ..,....: .....,•-:/ : ,... .,_--;- .",,Ife..."-`• 4.1.-.Si" '11541. A'ISP4.-1L'. : :..7::::::!::::..Z:riLl'..l.:-.:::.:. ' •144......7"1,-...7.-' .,-;;;;-:.-','",,r.,,L.:-.4w,‘:rato-'r --:' ..t.e...w...--'..' ..r.41119-1. .iiilfroti. /a:Al/Ai-6. _saw' ':1i . ... 1 . . i I I I I 1 I I I i ;,,,:.;.'..,-•,,-.4,,,...-.;:,:,.. ...:•:.:. - -- I • 1 I f I ' I . I I. ..,. ■•■ A;i1 IL, • -SOR - iiiainri W".■• • ■•••41111100...41.0.. .. . ......01 "gr""iilibow ',. - ."'". • —.------...,,._...,._, __ .rlii .... NIT 1,..i-4-.:•.;:::"Art:'j. :.-,7i.. ,. $4.-:A:-.--41 =Pc,:ire• ..44, N\ ,:.:. , , ....„,,...7c4...,:„. ,,,•......,. . , .....4, ..., , r,...„,-..-...„.,, .:_,.. . ......, , F -^ : :I — ::i -"tt• .,..r.-;;;::7,..,-,-0 i?..-_',:;ii,i 4i'Lt ,-,. ... :- -. . - ---:,-;%4;-.. . ..%- -- , • • .):3, r _ _ •"•7 C..,..! Ci) a c -.•-:.i!.:4 — ' ... • "... rn so c") . . __ — fz-'!.•.- „,• - 7 ■■4= / . , ,i 1111111= =NM _ i ...... *,-I lk- i I ) i - ) .- ' 4144.4...:JS'ir -°' ;!-'11rri 'Z • .._./ ,s._....” .4,1 .---- .-.:,..„..,..,..t.Z.:A,e . . l. ''": :..--.; "V, .a., r• .'\14 t .- '.- •■••,1--2:i.-'4,:--..::-■4..:''.t‘:.;,;.::'':."-?-,:-.',...:,....5.11.;41t,,:',V.1!;t:t"- -- "‘"---.1•Nee......- •'''-'t-41.! . • .7 .f. .4 -1 f ... - -',;.■:1...,.:".., :. c..) a 1....1.,■11`, :::":',Iir ' 7,.....;.....,:z-.-..."., :!...:-::::...;,:f...,,-1.,.-:-.■:rt.'," ri,-""'-'''' - ALIZ.-".A.0■6:4.74.1%lirtil - .r.•--.:...:.-■:--"--%•--1.1'..et:-.. ,,, .... '2"•:.,•t' ■ • j 1 i .. f.'.,.i;.,,.. i. ti):,;1* - . , . -J47...7 . ..1 II -..:t . . . ..,, .... . -..:=7„.1.,...< , L. 1--. .S.i4.-.. 'Ng • ...• \ .,....,,k1:,0 ....' ,Z.•:-..0 • F1' -',..t C C Cn .14. ..-.0-1•C-' ;:t•-•;:oZ.'-t F--cl co •rfp,•iYAI:t Vf.t."- Li rn m 2 A, = cp 0 ..414. .7.=:-.,--. ......e._,$.4. 3'..-y--• XII 4;-4 cn 0—1 . r C/3 • M --I I..,...-to y.. ,-, k.r. •• • pIL /..., Ira MI • 00 . - 41, ..-..,.1 t -i COMO Z a . 0 ill - $- •-•" :' _m.t Iv 4i:kl- I • -) 1.1. ..4" aer- 411i, :. ..• _me im •... .:1., , 6..._. . . - - nrA• 11111m11.• ••=11 ..Eritag..3railli ifir'5 •<, •7,...4. AZ: Nialkiwilikaliia Anillitabodiglag MI • .„-- -.1V,i7x-4 ',.c,r,":". 44 1 ...1. ...j,:i.g..,i':. t',..-..t.j.. . rV f..i' E 1-',.■.1...• " 7:7(147::' 4' '...i.N1. P. ..• 1 1 1 I I I I 1 I .-..' . - . --•' "1„ Y., ■ *.-- or,_ .. -•*- -4.1.*. 414.filifiL Ailifithrlai. &MMA- dis-ia. '••::::.- .1.4.4.1.4.!,..r..3........ ..wlmw....... Opt, 9c141;riec44,04 Pit,Y1 ' 9 (g : . fL = .r • •;.1► .j h 1 � s • § ' 4"4 V 1 -11 0 ∎s -\-1 (► b ° o1 �, 4 r N 211 O 1 Z�" 41-0" o 0 .17' j ",i 11— v — O 9T _Adn 6 T- S N • Tz 1 0113 } , „..,jr. , . 1 : 37-1.4.i.- . . : Z .64'#1. • I .% .4 liS7., _ . i r. t ki• C ' �`' .� Vf U) . A lei . . . : rl'1,1',;. :;;':.41.° f • r I l' 6 s T {' Z- `r z ;t7 -7<- i uil .. ATE _� zoo , k` 71 ;s-, - _ 3 sod ,r ' �, r • 01 -C i_ I T s q Agenda Information Memo July 16, 1991 City Council Meeting • COMPREHENSIVE GUIDE PLAN/ TRANSPORTATION PLAN AND PUBLIC UTILITIES PLAN ELEMENTS C. Update on Metropolitan Review of Eagan Transportation Plan and Public Utilities Plan Elements--Enclosed on pages 17 through /0/ is a memorandum from the Community Development Department outlining progress on the Metropolitan Council review of the City's amendments to the transportation plan and public utilities plan elements of its comprehensive guide. As indicated in the memo, the Metropolitan Council staff has identified certain issues with respect to each of the elements which cannot be adequately addressed until the Metropolitan Council completes revisions of its 2010 forecasts for these policy areas. Met Council staff did indicate support for the general goals of these elements and suggested that the City withdraw them for the time being until the Met Council forecasts are completed. In the interim, it is suggested that Council consider formalizing these elements as interim policy even though final adoption cannot occur until Met Council a proval. The staff memorandum includes a resolution, enclosed on pages /OZthrough r 03, which would accomplish that action. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny a memorandum updating the transportation plan and public utilities plan elements of the comprehensive guide plan as interim standards until the Metropolitan Council review can be completed. • • • a v M E M O R A N D U M TO: Tom Hedges, City Administrator FROM: Kristy Marnin, Senior Planner - DATE: July 9, 1991 SUBJECT: City Council Agenda Item - July 16, 1991 Meeting Update on Metropolitan Council Review of Eagan Transportation Plan and Public Utilities Plan Elements As you may recall, the City Council recently approved amendments to the Transportation Plan and Public Utilities Plan Elements of the Comprehensive Guide Plan. Following is an update on the Metropolitan Council 's review of these amendments. In accordance with the Metropolitan Land Planning Act, staff submitted these comprehensive plan amendments to the Metropolitan Council for its review and approval. City staff then met with Metropolitan Council staff to discuss these amendments. At that meeting, Metropolitan Council staff indicated that they would be unable to recommend approval of the amendments for the following reasons: Transportation Plan Element: year 2010 employment forecasts and functional classifications for four roadway segments Public Utilities Plan Element: year 2010 employment and wastewater flow forecasts The major issue of contention is the forecasts. As usual, the Metropolitan Council 's forecasts are far below the City's forecasts. City staff has consistently informed the Metropolitan Council that we disagree with their year 2010 forecasts, but generally to no avail. In 1989, we were successful in gaining a revision to the Metropolitan Council's year 2010 forecasts which raised households to 30,000 and employment to 45,000. Although the - Metropolitan Council's year 2010 household forecast is now consistent with the City's forecast, the year 2010 employment forecast still remains far below our forecast of 71,800. Likewise, the Metropolitan Council's year 2010 wastewater flow forecast remains below the City's forecast. In discussing the Transportation Plan and Public Utilities Plan amendments, Metropolitan Council staff stated that they would not revise their forecasts at this time because they are currently preparing new forecasts which will not be completed until mid-1992. As such, unless the City lowered its year 2010 forecasts to match the Metropolitan Council forecasts, the amendments would be denied due to inconsistency with metropolitan systems plans. cA.G\ • Tom Hedges • July 9, 1991 Page 2 The City's forecasts are based on adopted land use and zoning designations, past land use trends, and current and projected development activity. The Metropolitan Council's forecasts, on the other hand, are based on total figures for the entire seven county metro area which are then allocated among all metropolitan communities based on socio-economic trends. The sum of these allocations is not allowed to exceed the regional total. Since the City's forecasts are based on tangible local information as opposed to regional statistical assumptions, City staff and its consultants feel that our forecasts remain the most accurate. To randomly lower our forecasts merely to match Metropolitan Council forecasts could adversely affect existing and future development in the City. Since we expressed our hesitance to revise the City's forecasts at this time, Metropolitan Council staff suggested that the City withdraw the amendments and resubmit them after the new forecasts are completed. Also, Metropolitan Council staff indicated that they were supportive of the City's transportation goals and policies as contained in the Transportation Plan Element, and suggested that the City resubmit these alone for review and approval by the Metropolitan Council. Rather than having the amendments denied or subjectively revising the City's forecasts, staff opted to follow Metropolitan Council staff's suggestion of withdrawing the amendments from review for the time being, and 411 resubmitting the Transportation Plan Element goals and policies alone for review and approval. At this time, both the Transportation Plan and Public Utilities Plan Elements have been withdrawn from Metropolitan Council review, and the Metropolitan Council has approved the Transportation Plan Element goals and policies. Because the City attempted to meet the requirements of conformance of local comprehensive plans with systems plans by submitting amended Transportation Plan and Public Utilities Plan Elements, and because the preparation of new forecasts by the Metropolitan Council is the main circumstance which necessitated the City's request to defer further review of the amended plan elements and the timing of this circumstance is not under the City's control, staff requested assurance from the Metropolitan Council that review of any other comprehensive plan amendments submitted by the City in the interim will not be unnecessarily delayed or penalized because of pending review of these amended plan elements. The Metropolitan Council has responded to this request in writing, stating that it is not its intent to unnecessarily delay or penalize future plan amendments from Eagan. The Metropolitan Council will use the existing plan and information provided with amendment submissions to review future plan amendments from the City. . � v1'° Tom Hedges • July 9, 1991 Page 3 In summary, City staff has withdrawn the amended Transportation Plan and Public Utilities Plan Elements from Metropolitan Council review at this time. These plan elements were withdrawn at the suggestion of Metropolitan Council staff as an interim measure while they complete their new forecasts. The goals and policies as contained in the Transportation Plan Element, however, have been approved by the Metropolitan Council. To formalize City action on the amended plan elements at this time, the City Council is requested to approve the attached resolution which acknowledges that, although Metropolitan Council review is pending, the City has updated the Transportation Plan and Public Utilities Plan Elements of the Comprehensive Guide Plan, and that the City has adopted these updated plan elements for use as guides for transportation and public utilities planning in the interim. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please advise. Attachment cc: Dale Runkle SJim Sturm Mike Dougherty • • RESOLUTION NO. 91- A RESOLUTION AMENDING THE EAGAN COMPREHENSIVE GUIDE PLAN i WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Eagan is the official governing body of the City of Eagan; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Eagan adopted the Comprehensive Guide Plan on April 19, 1983, pursuant to the requirements of Minnesota Statutes, Section 473.864 ; and WHEREAS, the Advisory Planning Commission of the City of Eagan did recommend approval of amendments to the Comprehensive Guide Plan which update the Transportation Plan Element and Public Utilities Plan Element on February 26, 1991 and April 23, 1991, respectively; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Eagan reviewed these amendments to the Comprehensive Guide Plan and concurred with the recommendations of the Advisory Planning Commission and found that I the proposed Comprehensive Guide Plan amendments are in the best interests of the City; and WHEREAS, the City Council approved the Transportation Plan Element amendment on March 5, 1991 and the Public Utilities Plan Element amendment on May 7, 1991 for submission to the Metropolitan Council; and WHEREAS, these amendments were submitted to the Metropolitan Council for its review; and WHEREAS, the City has subsequently withdrawn these amendments from review by the Metropolitan Council until such time as the Metropolitan Council completes new Year 2010 household, population and employment forecasts and the City has the opportunity to review these new forecasts and analyze their impact on the consistency of • the amended Transportation Plan and Public Utilities Plan Elements with metropolitan systems plans utilizing these new forecasts; and WHEREAS, in the interim the City will use the amended Transportation Plan and Public Utilities Plan Elements as the guides for transportation and public utility planning in Eagan; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EAGAN IN REGULAR MEETING ASSEMBLED, that the City Council hereby adopts amendments to the Comprehensive Guide Plan updating the Transportation Plan Element and the Public Utilities Plan Element for use in transportation and public utilities planning in Eagan, contingent upon pending Metropolitan Council review and comment. THIS RESOLUTION passed this day of , 1991 by the City Council of the City of Eagan, Minnesota. BY: Thomas A. Egan, Mayor ATTEST: E.J. VanOverbeke, City Clerk (o) Agenda Information Memo July 16, 1991 City Council Meeting • CITY CODE AMENDMENT/REGULATION OF DANCE HALLS. D. Amendment to the Eagan City Code,Chapter 6,Section 31,Regulation of Dance Halls-- The Police Department in coordination with)he City Atto ey's office has prepared the City Code amendment enclosed on pages /62.c through /bias a means of regulating public dances as a consequence of experience within the City 40 concerns raised regarding the conduct of such activities. Also enclosed on page (4 7 is a copy of a letter from John VanderAarde, Grand Slam Sports, relative to that business' experience with dances at their location at the Cedarvale Shopping Center. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny an amendment to the Eagan City Code, Chapter 6, Section 31 regulating dance halls as presented. 10 D CITY CODE CHAPTER 6, SEC. 31 REGULATING DANCE HALLS The City Council of the City of Eagan ordains that the Eagan City Code of 1990 shall be amended by adding the following: Subd. 1. Definitions. A. Dance Hall. A public dancing place, as the term is used hereinafter, shall be taken to mean any room, place, or space open to public patronage in which dancing, wherein the public may participate, is carried on and for which admission may be had by the public by payment, directly or indirectly, of an admission fee or price for dancing. B. Public Dance. As the term is used in those Sections, it shall be taken to mean any dance wherein the public may participate by payment, directly or indirectly, of admission fee or price for dancing, or a fee for a membership in a club, and shall include any manner of holding a dance which may be participated in by the public through the payment of money, directly or indirectly. Subd. 2 . Permits. It shall be unlawful for any person to give, hold, or conduct a public dance unless the owner or proprietor of the public dancing place, or the person giving the same or in charge thereof, shall first have procured a permit to hold, give, or conduct such public *dance from the public authorities hereinafter designated, as hereinafter rovided. Subd. 3 . Issuance of a Permit. Such permit shall be obtained from the City Clerk after submitting an application to the City Clerk for presentation to the City Council on the next Council meeting agenda. Such permits may be issued by the City Council for one or more public dances or for a period of time not exceeding one year. A permit shall be issued at a fee and under such conditions as the City Council may from time to time determine. Subd. 4 . Permit to be posted. Any person desiring a permit to hold, give, or conduct a public dance shall make application therefor by filing with the City Clerk, a verified application, in writing, setting forth the name and address of the person, persons, committee or organization who are to give, hold, and conduct the same, the time, duration, and place where such dance is to be held, in the area of the premises where the dance is to be given. The application shall be submitted to the City Clerk who shall then refer the application to the Chief of Police of the municipality for investigation and report before the granting of the permit. The Chief of Police shall return the application, along with the investigation and report of the proposed licensee, to the City Council to be placed on the next Council meeting agenda. The City Council shall thereupon act upon the application and either grant or reject the same. In the case the same is granted, the City Council shall direct the proper officers to issue the same. The permit shall specify the names and officers of the persons to whom issued, the amount paid therefor, and the S (C) time, duration, and place where the public dance is to be held, as well as any other conditions of approval required by the City Council. The perm shall be posted in a public place in the dance hall described therei during the time the public dance mentioned therein is being given, and the persons named in the permit shall be responsible under the law for the manner in which the public dance is being held and conducted. Subd. 5. Applications. All applications for such permits shall be made upon blanks furnished by the City and they shall be accompanied, upon request by references which shall affirmatively show by the application and references that the applicant is a person of good moral character and reputation in the community in which the applicant lives and the applicant has not within five years prior to the making of the application, been convicted of a felony, gross misdemeanor, or of any of the provisions of this ordinance or a law similar thereto, and no such application shall be granted to any person of bad character or who has been so convicted as aforesaid, nor to any person who is deemed likely to permit illegal behavior to occur in or around the public dance. No permit shall be issued under the terms of this ordinance unless the City Council is satisfied that the place where the public dance is to be given or held is properly ventilated and equipped with necessary toilets, washrooms, lighting facilities, and that such place is not likely to become a public nuisance or detrimental to public morals. Subd. 6. Obscene or Indecent Behavior. No person shall in any public dance hall act or speak in rude, boisterous, obscene, or indecent manner, nor shall any person to whom a permit has been issued suffer permit any person to so act or speak therein. Subd. 7. Lights. Every public dancing place shall be brightly illuminated while in public use, and dancing therein while the lights are extinguished, dimmed, or turned low, so as to give imperfect illumination is hereby prohibited. Sub. 8. Not to Admit Certain Persons. No person to whom a permit has been issued shall permit to be or remain in any public dancing place any intoxicated person, any prostitute, any person of known immorality, nor any unmarried person under the age of 17 years, unless such person is accompanied by a parent or guardian, nor any unmarried person more than 17, and under the age of 18 years unless such person is accompanied by a parent or guardian or presents the written consent of the parent or guardian to the officer in charge of such dance. Sub. 9. Officer May Attend Public Dances. The Chief of Police may, as a condition for approval of a permit, require an officer of the law be present at a public dance to be given or held thereunder during the time the public dance is being held. Such officer of the law shall be designated by the Chief of Police of the City. In all cases the fees and expenses of such officer of the law shall be paid in advance by the person to whom the permit has been issued. All premises licensed under this Chapter shall at all times be open to inspection by any police officer to determine whether or not this Chapter and all other laws are bein observed. All persons, as a condition to being issued such license, cons � _2_ �O� to such inspection by such officers and without a warrant for searches or Allseizures. It is unlawful for any licensee, or agent or employee of a licensee, to hinder or prevent a police officer from making such inspection. Subd. 10. Hours. No public dance shall be held or conducted between the hours of 1: 00 o'clock A.M. and 6:00 o'clock A.M. of any day; provided, that no public dance shall be held or conducted on Sunday between the hours of 1: 00 o'clock A.M. and 12: 00 o'clock noon thereof. In all other cases the City Council issuing the permit herein provided for may, if they so desire, fix the hours within which public dances may be held, not inconsistent herewith, and shall also have authority by ordinance or resolution, to regulate or prohibit the same on Sunday, within the limits of the City. Subd. 11. Smoking or Consumption of Alcoholic Beverage. Establishments having on sale liquor licenses are specifically excluded from the provisions of this section of the City Code except that the City Council may, as a condition for the issuance of an on sale liquor license, require an establishment to meet all or a portion of the provisions of this section as a condition for the issuance of the on sale liquor license. In all cases, the City Council may, as a condition to the issuance of a dance hall permit, prohibit or limit smoking or the consumption of alcoholic beverages on the premises for which a permit has been granted during the hours for which the permit is granted and two (2) hours before and after the time set forth on the permit for the dance. No ingestion of non- 4Iprescription controlled substances shall be permitted on the premises for Pdhich a dance hall permit has been granted. Subd. 12 . Numbers of Persons Admitted. Each permit shall set forth the maximum number of persons to be admitted to a public dance. Subd. 13 . Waiver of Permit. The City Council may determine that certain public dances, or public dances at certain facilities may be conducted without a permit and shall authorize the City Staff to execute a waiver or permit for such dances. Subd. 14. Disposition of Fees. All fees for permits hereunder shall be paid into the general fund of the City. Subd. 15. Revocation of Permit. The City Council may at any time revoke the permit and may revoke any such permit held by any person convicted of violating any of the provisions of this ordinance. Subd. 16. Violation a Misdemeanor. Every person violates a section, subdivision, paragraph, or provision of this Chapter when he performs an act thereby prohibited or declared unlawful, or fails to act when such failure is thereby prohibited or declared unlawful, or performs an act prohibited or declared unlawful or fails to act when such failure is prohibited or declared unlawful by a Code adopted by reference by this Chapter, and upon conviction thereof, shall be punished as for a misdemeanor except as otherwise stated in specific provisions hereof. -3- Every licensee under this Section shall be responsible for the conduct of his/her place of business and the acts of his/her employees. Subd. 17 . Effective Date. This ordinance shall take effect upon its adoption and publication according to law. ATTEST: CITY OF EAGAN CITY COUNCIL BY: Its Clerk Its Mayor Date Ordinance Adopted: Date Ordinance Published in the legal newspaper: -4- \ 03 . rOL10E DEPT. MAY 1 0 1991 A T EC 411 SLAM V.S.A. GRAND SLAM SPORTS &ENTERTAINMENT CENTER May 6, 1991 Eagan Police Police Chief Patrick Geagan 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55122 Chief of Police Geagan, This letter is in regards to the teen dances at Grand Slam Sports Center in Eagan. 4111 We had one incident that forced us to implement a membership policy that required signatures . Also, a dress code was enforced and members were asked to sign an agreement, with the understanding that if they showed bad behavior, they would be asked to leave the dance. Even after taking these measures, we continued to draw some undesirable patrons, and felt that for the good of our busi- ness we would discontinue the dances . Sincerely, o John A. Vander Aarde President 110 Cedarvale Mall- 3984 Sibley Memorial Hwy., Eagan, MN 55122 (612) 452-6569 V)4ck Agenda Information Memo July 16, 1991 City Council Meeting VARIANCE/NATURAL MINERALS CORPORATION/LOT COVERAGE REQUIREMENT E. Variance, Natural Minerals Corporation, of 1.6 % to the 35% Maximum Building Coverage Requirement,Located at 855 Apollo Road in the Northeast Quarter of Section 11- -An application has been received of Natural Minerals Corporation requesting a variance from a maximum 35% building coverage requirement. For additional information with respect to this application, please refer to the Community Development staff report which is enclosed on pages ((( through (/3 for your review. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny a variance for Natural Minerals Corporation of 1.6% to the 35%maximum building coverage requirement for their property located at 855 Apollo Road as presented. • • 0 SUBJECT: VARIANCE APPLICANT: NATIONAL MINERALS CORPORATION LOCATION: 855 APOLLO ROAD NE 1/4 OF SECTION 11 • ri E r z o � 0 PARTMENT o z 31 b € a H N ° r a so • R to Di .. La OH • v 4) a ro K • K X r NMC (National 71 z o a P4a M K _ building coverage. -s-ro 0 rt 4 x ti g Z r 4 w 0 CI . o m - om Fargo, North rn r1•<0 ••0 < ui I > r the metropolitan C K H Ii N t x►< i W * !d approval for a 4, LS m NCO Pi a Q have constructed N G 0 10 r z ; -0 g . They are now rt ct d At - 0 4 lerical employees. ra t- so a w c A Z Z. fia p z .a the existing office, I--M a . A mansard roof c Z ditio r. I n. They are in n ti C sll w D final construction D~ N r sr ° 7 1 q A HI O F-• 1 10 rt fi `< N • h+ 0"1" Z ti 0 rn m R1 ' 71 (D SG rt u re K o No v p 0 ••0 '° r tr H (0 T. M C a O K 0 T rj i 0 s ; °u rt v z m i a 5 tD o a v „ T . a N 30 N Existing and proposed = 68,513 sq. ft. Available area 186,911 sq. ft. = 36.6% 410 CONDITIONS: If approved, this Variance shall be subject to the following conditions: 1. No further Variances shall be approved for exceeding lot coverage maximums. 2. A landscaping plan shall be submitted, and approved, prior to the issuance of the building permit. 3. No employee, or work-related parking on the street shall be allowed. 4. The silos shall be painted the same color as the building. 5. All other applicable City requirements shall be met. /V I KFNNF7N .\.�9L `\� \ / N * .i ST � tf No s� �\� '\ :Yl�' E� R t 1 E f N k �� 4 y ti. C _ :f AF,£XINu TON�o< „� go Kr`Tv a.wrc '\• SE \ 9s r .,3-r— - sT fI E 'e Law o►R no*o s_ 1 ONE O u _ -\ •I-��- T. i, i';! Ott 5Ta (Co (i0 • 26 1 _ f• i' 1 UNM�MEM=F--._ . NB /.E».- o, __. . . , I: I_ ; _- �GBR 11 Ig QI ��� a ;;I! i� Si MINI S I III 1 - _ -1, '.,* \ Fr L1 1 I I �' �iII1..l+L.r 1991 STREET MAP 1991 ZONING MAP ill 1, C ? • • r wpom. 1 s" s EXISTING ■E L Z ..Exams EILLEING 1 5, \ r 5 • 1 ! 1 1, . .:' ± • •aaw M..e 1 viu II/LO....j 14 nr .-4.). ... fe";". "-. 4....■• . [_'_ R 11•1111111A 0 • • • •m_ - . Ol � Proposed • Building Addition ■ • • [ (...3 . Agenda Information Memo July 16, 1991 City Council Meeting • VARIANCE/DAVID PERRON/FRONT YARD SETBACK F. Variance, David Perron, of Approximately 4' to the Required 30' Frontyard Setback, Located on Lot 16, Block 9, Cedar Grove #7 in the Southeast Quarter of Section 20—An application has been received of David Perron for a variance of 4' from the 30' frontyard setback. Additional information with respect to this application is included n the Cpmmunity Development Department staff report which is enclosed on pages through I ("7 for your review. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the variance for David Perron of 4' from the 30' frontyard setback as presented. S • I I ci SUBJECT: VARIANCE APPLICANT: DAVID PERRON LOCATION: LOT 16, BLOCK 9, CEDAR GROVE 7 EXISTING ZONING: R-1 (SINGLE FAMILY) DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: JULY 16, 1991 DATE OF REPORT: JT'T V 10, 1991 COMPILED BY: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT APPLICATION SUMMARY: An application has been submitted by Mr. David Perron of 1783 Carnelian Lane for an approximate 4' Variance. BACKGROUND: Mr. Perron had been researching the possibility of purchasing a house with more character or even building a new home; however this was not financially feasible. The applicant enjoys his neighborhood and was mostly interested in changing the character of his home. With a consultant's help, they decided to give the house a "face lift". Due to illthe position of the home on the lot, 31' from property line, he is limited to what he can do to change its appearance. The applicant, and his consultant, chose a porch with a gabled roof line. They felt this would be the least encroaching change they could make into the setback area. COMMENTS: The applicant, in an effort to create more character for his home, has decided to put a porch on the front of his home. As drawn, the 4' x 21'6" porch will extend 4' into the setback area. The Variance is required because the gabled roof line and footings extend within the setback area. If approved, this Variance shall be subject to all applicable Code requirements. i S D `� ^^. I I - 1 3;r• .. .A ,.J '' 41.4 N .•3,�• I`7 . . NE �i ��• 1 Lam; T b "e�w..„1111 8LACKr P �t •` �\ C h it�aN �. 11 l ► PAR; ASJ �- a�A °.» ,M1 T 1. r `-, :t-44.— ' 1]�] ' ���jjj'111..`���T�T�T`'jjj���jjj S� . SAAYCLL �j '` -- '( I\k�G1'TO� •T< •l1 p,{ tI •_ zn*u� L PK" [[ j i )) -I(;.1 U� i-• T r • \ l I'E TA r ..01PE?�'$►'S';'�_i., I f t jlii.,I i S01111111 A CARNELIAN '. P/RI ,sf, l 1 ,1 •�- Ini;'.,.. McT { A -= 1 JADE LA �. ,-_ =4�'DUN'L - II!i1;ii ll I it. .1� L 3° tt. t,$ 1 'h • : �S tl - SM LN .IIP111 1j]1 I,.Ii " t �-. E1 CI- MEADOWS. I. ' I 1 �xL -4 ra'ta-zi." 0 , louTuit'1,74, -777{� J © wry if' ': I�! � t`, 7 , _R E 1991 STREET MAP j 1991 ZONING MAP �c L 14' ri Z/ 1 TO 1d •rePvg 119,1-.0 111 Nvi *4L.1 S NCI tv *U 1-1 ,4cJ AMNI1 bJJ A ■1 , R t 3 i, II li t_,_-1._ 1 gi QF A t ',(14 K lik1 ____ 1 /,,.",_.:17.__ _r__„I___,--_ --1 i t ' -1/4 • ,i, in • 1 \ l ',' iiiiilli---, , ! t � ' i _ i ! .. ! - _-3-It A I.\S I -F _I 11 4 milmi I 1 4 r L 1 _ 4/ • -P� _ II t ,‘ _- ID 1--i --\izTN-- 1- —4) 0 0 .+ 1 (.(a --77 0.-41-- Ler /4, i5tc“ ? Gib Ak oov4 7 78 et,Er 135. ;G. /0 5.< Lig .70' Y.( )1. , Forc f-• 311 _Y — _ _ – A. /7' 37.4! 17. • • • < Agenda Information Memo July 16, 1991 City Council Meeting IP WAIVER OF PLAT/DCR COMPANY/SPLITTING A SINGLE TAX PARCEL G. Waiver of Plat, DCR Company, in Order to Split a Single Tax Parcel (#051-06), Located Along BeauDeRue Drive in the Northeast Quarter of Section 19—At its regular meeting of June 25, 1991, the Advisory Planning Commission considered an application for a waiver of plat for the above-referenced parcel consisting of the Cedarvale Hillside Apartments and Cedarvale Highlands Shopping Center. For additional information with respect to the proposed waiver, please lefpr to the unity Development Department staff report which is enclosed on pages 1 1 through -.Z for your review. The effect of the split would be to permit separate ownership of a apartment complex and the retail shop ing center located beneath it. The APC minutes are enclosed on pages/ through ��7 for your review. The APC is recommending approval of this application. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny a waiver of plat for Huemoeller & Bates to split tax parcel #051-06 located along BeauDeRue Drive as presented. SPECIAL NOTE: Enclosed on page 1d is a copy of a letter received from Huemoeller & Bates requesting that the Waiver of Plat application for the DCR Company be continued 0 indefinitely. ill 1 ( • SUBJECT: WAIVER OF PLAT 110 APPLICANT: HUEMOELLER & BATES LOCATION: PROPOSED LOT 1, BLOCK 1, STRYKER ADDITION (PARCEL 051-06, NE 1/4 SECTION 19) EXISTING ZONING: CSC (COMMUNITY SHOPPING CENTER) DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: JUNE 25, 1991 DATE OF REPORT: JUNE 19, 1991 COMPILED BY: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT APPLICATION SUMMARY: An application has been submitted requesting a Waiver of Plat to split a tax parcel for individual ownership. There will be no development as a result of this process. The location is the Cedarvale Hillside Apartment complex and retail center along Beau D'Rue Drive and Rahn Road. The Waiver of Plat will sever a portion of the air rights from the proposed Lot 1, Block 1, Stryker Addition; specifically it will split the residential area from the commercial area. The separation does not cover the entire parcel on the same level since the owners of the retail area want to have air rights higher than their ceiling level along Beau D'Rue Drive so that trees, pylon signs, light standards, and any other encumbrance would be fully on their own property. If approved, this Waiver of Plat shall be: 1. recorded with the County within 60 days of Council action, with documentation provided to the City. • S FINANCIAL OBLIGATION - WAIVER OF PLAT 19-W-3-5-91 Based upon the study of the financial obligations collected in the past and the uses of the • P Y property, the following charges are proposed. The charges are computed using the City's . existing fee schedule and existing connections to the City's utility system based on the submitted plans. The areas and frontages used in the computations include all areas and frontages on existing parcel 10-01900-020-10. The submittals for the Waiver describe a plat covering the above named parcel. Improvement Project Use Rate Quantity Amount Trunk storm sewer C/I $.017/SF 131,894 SF $ 2,242 Water availability charge C/I $2,420/AC 2.18 AC 5,276 Water trunk C/I $1,536/AC 2.18 AC 3,348 Sanitary sewer lateral $16.90/FF 268 FF 4,529 Water lateral 139A $4,056/LS 1 IS 4,056 Storm sewer lateral 139A $11,575/LS 1 LS 11,575 • Total $31,306 0 0 1 d-L) • iW � ' II /// CC Lt NI_ _ • (! ..� ''40.00 • «, ( �* w y N36'34' N ` p +1 ��, (IH , 1 by T 1151 \0 . 6 1 s . ) 4 s 83.J • — t , : , • '( • \ , h r IN ( -J 'O 1 ' h i ' i N �. \ . $ - 1 1 , Jil , / \ 1 ` S 36 34'5G 's W ■ 40.00 _ '.='� 1 W I 1 i It‘ \ '‘ eh L ..., • w u �AIF/ 1 rt q* / i i = I i- t ov9 \- • .J, / .. Al • ri •Ile I 0--i ii ii I: •1. 11 :2 z1. . !.-.. , . . 0 11 , iiii .1. ‘,..,:.:;, .. ! s fel P i i Eti li . !-0=,::.-.1::.,.vdp,i1 , ;, 0 .11 0 ii •cii I, !I 11, 1,1;;i=s017:7.,72.,,-.1,;!: 6 11 ii. ili".?iF„::::!..1 :, 1il 1E Cc 1. is,:ili :1,1•....-, ,.;; F., 1.1 • I:!1 i II IL iill'IIIiiilliq:01: - . ..: 1-1•1.......i:„ __, . i.,. . . 1 k il :40iiiti:Iiiiiiiiiiiip.i:t il 81,401:14: :,..10...:, I, iiii • . . ... • . .1. 111 10.1 .. . , Ha. 11: I I -sa is - . a lt . . a ••• • • ••. E.°. a. id lit li g • • • • • , , • • . n. • g • t • . .. .. : • .. 8 II) I a g n, II :1 rt at :di i ../!!-!. .:t• !".t e.. ...‘ .-1 ... 1 11 I 11Z. •.- .." ' J ; U / •..;''. < / ..%'.• .• h. e M a a . • .• ,.•:; /. / /..7 . / t K1 7'to` V\ 0 ir t,P I / \ z—.011-4,---....g ‘1' / ; • ;..... \ I re) .„., .. ••::: \ .-...•::................... . \ ..i.-::.i:i;;LN, .:...s:i:i„:if::„.:... 310 ....;..:i::..:::.:...:i::;i:ii:::.. i::.-...i:t.':,'!,:. \ v,::::::i .. t: Ar ::F: %):::1;i::1i:::i::. Cr '. ..",ii::ii:i".:iii: '. :Ii : :: .. • .: Fii:ii.iLiii:. . \ • \.• '"- s: : :.#,.... .: : . .L.....:45c.::?.Ffiigli!iiii. \ CC .. ..'\1:: ilil::\1:, ,::.:I....iSINZ.:„. 7•ii,if...-:.:::-::.,i:".-'\-.7:1'f'7.'1............................:7??!ii:lillii:. \ i . . :::.....•:::•,::• ..... .... spi ,,b_• . • • ,.. : 146: : . > %.9 / .............17,:.\Y' .!..•.,.::,f: ::: •:11,,::::ii:::!ii:::1::::::::: \ P- „ ,:i ..:. :::::::.:: .....N.,...N::::::::::. • `•;i: IIN-1..:‘:f : '.' •.::. •.. •••:*,•::..-0,,,f::::• •..:•::::•::..••::. / \ ' :';::: :!:.....7::...-".:!:: :::• N::),':\:•,-.N-':?::::::: .::::.:;••'.:;:i:::\ \, s?::::::: .4(:. :..::. .W::::: ::. \ ..• i:, :iii:::,,,.;:ii::. :::. A::.A.:. ..• ?!:.:. :::::!:.. g \ .• N...:..fr.:.::. r:•::::\••• • -. ...” tw .:::•‘ \ ...„::: ....:,.::::::::•.::• .::::::i:.=.. ::• .• :::• •::• \\\\\ -:. . .... , t- D \., it, . . '..:::.iiiiigii:::::'.:::•-• ' • .. .:....:: .::. .• :. -;:i.•:ii:::. , , ..::!Fiiii!,1::.::i:Eii:.'. •:.:::• • -- so... N. \ \,, .i:! !::.::;:,.:;iii. • isii,:..: ,7 " , • .':.i;:iiiIiiii:::::::. %,, \ N`...41.':......'..!!;:.. lq,°'‘•' ' :: :1:11figiIR:ill:. \ ''•:... \ 1; 41:F.Vi;.:!:.,-•• Vk. - . i :,. ‘ 4.:::X. , . ::::• ::■!::::: ‘ Ot ,Qt.p. ■• .............. :: V:::• .1i.. ;:t•:,:i.: ........I: ‘ / \ ih. .'.-:..::::11;7:—::-5 i li:`••.:f I:1•:• •*:'!t::..;.-'ll.ii:il Nis. .:i•:;::::ilifilliNi:•.4i.-'i::1111h•' N '7 ......... . ''••••.... . •:: •:::::•:, • ••_, ..::.'. .::::,::::::::•,,..:' \ \ ki, •‘‘ . . . .Ait: \ s_ ..:!:N::f..'.',ifilliiiligf::::1,,:!!::iiV::;-"..........:: ./ ?-. \ N, 'N 4 ta.,.....................................fl:.;V ■ Ne. \ 0 ,.... .......... : :.:::::.. ei ':F:. .e. . N. \too \jf ;::..: .:. .::i.r $ /- %. , -....1::::• ::•)::::'•.:••-.:' . \.,:■':....::-D, ..:- :-..•.....•• • ii g 64, \• •:................ efil'Il.."" •774:.:::$: 4,00 ... ... N. V ,::.i:::.4 ly 4:. \ • V. ,.? V y \-.... . t..7„,- •• :.: ,.........:•:.:. p 2; 1 i: I: 1 le Z : . 0 . s • 1.1 I Pi! 1. 11!i Illil 1 iilliii0:!11.1 I r ,ii,-11.1::::::::4c.,11, 0 ii.,!!!!iii,, • * ct ii i ii 1 E cc I ill Isi il I riiIrs .1.1 1 t I i i 1 il 10:404,-ii:100.,:;.1 i` . :. WW1. 1; kiii:iii_ 111101. .. -.. I, ; 1:::;t1: - - . -,v1;:i. _ . • t . Ili v.j_ iltil--Y, is I'llili4;iiiiiiiiiii!oil • . _ ei ••■ • • f 1111 1 i I I'1 .' I V) il ili:11! ..,lis:::.::.11,.g1 ls ii11111:i1:::EifiE! fill a :• 1 i 1 ..1 Wii . il_ . i ... e • •• .4 • • e 6. et ... ..• • • • s • • , . • . . • z a 2 : gig $ ! •• ... •• •• -, • I . W .4,-,.,=....• •= r..= f :::::, 7.1 g 2 ml t / 1 .,.‹ 1 ' , •■• I 4 T '''' .- • . ,.... ,- / v i... ).... ,. /0•,//\ T.,• Apt / / \ z–.......Hkr—... ‘: .... r - .:,. ... ... /4 ;"' .. *::::::::::• /+v • ..• • .:..k: •\ \ * (1° • Cr • \ / 0. - *. 1 .N. ::::..ii•.:1 •:!::. \‘ . .).> 1 ,:::::::;?:: ..•::::::::::. \ • - ,,.•::..• : •:iii::::Iii:::.• \ J •, , ., ,,, - 4,,,, i I, , \.:::. ::i:::::::::::::::: N Ow \ eS , ,.' ., , t •—•,:i •;;;;:::::.L.:•::::: \ # •%s :A/ ..(1 .. % !II (r/( 1- i( -. \ A-', i •i ...: --..t.i:::::: : :: \ , , 7 ■( \\ \‘i i ■: :1).....: .0- !fiiiiiNi::111: \ / , . \'‘,.1" \;!',;::-\ lr.•..:.:4.i:: :-..f..A',..!iiiiiiiii:tilisifi: \ ,, . e::.<4.4-,;N:: : \ ,.. .T,N ), • • '.........::•- :Ii:'?.X':'::::::...::..'ff...:::..` Wed \ At ,\v /, *iii;',1. '. ::::::::A "::lli:::i:. ::Hi::.:F:. \ .\ \..:7 •.T,•t::::::•■::ii...'il:.:ik: 411-* .• :i211 ,•.::.• F -:. : •i: .::::: Ipiii:::::::::.•'f;:ii.;',..„ -:::I::li.-I,.:!::! \ . .74':..•::: i‘.::::if:. \ *tit._ v 4.1.„ v , .... ...: ....::.. . , ......... . • . • :• .:. k 3 0 -\,, . N, ::!::i;I:1::::•..:'....•:. - ::•ii:es::. '. :,.:: . \ W '. , - \ .• .:•::i:::::::: :: Cii::5k.- • '. 11il:. \ ......... a '4. \ .... It \ . :IS;; ; • :: •:ii;•- ". ::• •• . s:S . 1.•?:. •:'. .i •• il:•::::::::::. \ s.. t.... \ v.Ay:..N:::i::... is,-N.-:..0.....v.A::iigigIRE::: \ /., 4 . 5?. :: .1/21.::.•., F 1 : :.•::t:ii•Pft.:::::::. k / \• !!.,,:::::1,70 , : :•• N. : : '.:. .Nt ::: ‘ ::::: :::::: 1 .. •:::::\:•••• •:•::::::::::"::::..,::. . ::. .,• •:: •:::,:::„.,.:N,, :::::::::::::::::::::•• \ 1, .N:::!.::;::. .._ .. ..: •:..,-s •::::: '::::::::: '•)\ 1 CO • --1.•::: :• •:::::• •:. -IliiAr• . •s•ci:::: ::::::: .• \‘6, .s,„ :I•ii•r,•::. • ::ii:::::::. ': '::::i'll. ." ::::::" .•:" . ...a ,. •: ).::: \ :% ... , N, ,, tr.i:::::::::rii'::::::: •:•.:::..:' .i::::c \.i 0 ,•::**1::::::::::::::: *:• :::. :.Y..:'::: ■ I ni 'it' ‘ to ' ,z::!6,..i:::: :•4::::: .:.:::::/•• .1." v \ • '-:::::?5::;:. •::x:iii. •:.'`•• •' /,e \ .\-:::::::::::::: 7.'....::II': ... 31 V or , \-.,-;::::,,,:iv,„...:::::: ,....011,..- us ei 1.%.1.0•.: '3.• ••••Wt. \ \ ' Cr ° c., \ . , •`,.... „..." 4. \•:.\v.. • \ :::::::::'• ::::•:•:.. .., 1■c)1. i° i! • 1:� II z 1. I.•0 !l, , �,ii i. 11.1-1. -. � f • 111ii1;t;i.iii311f0i::.1fi1 I rel - 0 c Q 1; 1-iii1:1!!!If !i iii!ii Ili '1:! :, 151E '' ■ :Ei ii: 15 1 it cc II III 14,41FiFintir:11:, It W 1 IIiI lii:ii !- -iiiiliiiii;`::1 .1• II ilii.iiii.i !•i•i!i_llii•isi i i1,o ' 1!' iniiilliieii=.E.!=.Wild=t 1 $ i1Ei; • • ! -kat ii . S S i at : g : « . w r, • ,� i i g •i t s s I 1 O E /'o� �% J \ z `j'• / f //, \ 1 / r � \ N / s \ / - 4 - : �\ \ \ A t ' } • A ` 4 , \✓ r `` \ \\ N d \\' \ (-/,(' 7 ,- _ ,o ‘ ,:\ , \ \ I". C. •,\� , c'' f•, \ 4 \,.,,, . \ tie I 4, ••• - ` , \,, per. • ` ` \ 1. De N. \te ' -\'\•- •St_ ..-'0 .... hi �.; . I 7' t de �_ .• ` \ , � / . \ # V 11` \ S; ' Z 1. . , 0 0 ! pi' 1. ., ,1 -. I reli ilillii."111.1 O 0 : iel !I "..i.,• •• 0 'a 15 cc !: 141.1140:YiY!.!ii!:;ii! t II 15 E Cr -I L• i—it- . . . . ., • 1- silisiT0:v.i:::-:.:I11-.; i .1, ..0„ . .r. : i: t 1.1J 1 II hii! ! pjf.lr:;z1 I 41 Y Ill.•!!::::1-1 I 111 1::::i. N: 1!:1 ; lidii:- :11111111-::;03:::. II a 4,1 l's :10 p k 11 leippop !!„"ii . O. ea. 111:11 0- ft ts=, j i! iiiiiiiiii:11: ;i:itiliiiii al •-• .• • i • Id: 1: --II I 4.181 i • i Phi . !l_i "' a : : -.sit ii • • • e . 2 . • —. • . . ... c I! si I • • •• • • • • • : e g • •... g : : .4' W i - - - - .• : ; : F. s) a 4 a • •I a - • . :I 7, ; a i _,...,L!=• = nr. E. 17..., •..:--•.-1. • , • ..,. / :.'7.— .• .. I . .-. 0 .,, / .•. p. 0 ./ .... ' j/ / 2 %• / /- \ 1 C •.,' API. IV , \ 2--"""°1-4—",■4 1 / / ; /X - \ I us -..., / "s, .i‹.\\I /7/ot‘ ' * , • "..,\ \ .., 0 \ \ / g os _ _id, ‘ \ ... \\ ,\ , )• , . N. •\,./ .t ),,,,, 3„, \ • I • .• - 4:e,.:• 'kt. • \. e \t\ \ \ \\\ ......i \ # \! 11 • . \ , 'It ..:'. y 1: \ ' •I A i1/4- \ / AX .o.b' \ \ J , \ s, . \\,$) \\JY''' P e• \'' ,.T. \ / \\ " S\ V . • Oe \ \\\ /"*.:.. .;‘ •,, s.,\ \ ,..„,,, \--- ..' \ W ';.-, \ '• \,i / ` .\ \ 4 \\\ . \ 1... \ X --V_‘• ■ ■,go \ \ •. \ et "'it,.. \...\ \t,,‘,, .,„,,, ,.. 's - , 1 , , \s, % ''.i... \ \ .‘. 1.\ ',.!, ki N • \ \ oe ,.„-.). 1,..... , NN,,,, ‘•• ,.... . -,,• - , , —\ / \ -,...„, -..., ,-; „..N. ,...e•---,•.„ 1-.., %.4 s. ,X ;. \lik:o• ‘,. \ 3 ,k\ 7. .„, 4,,,,, ..., , ..... \ N. , t ,..),.,,. .....- • , :, \ — . , ...,-. .i. \ ,,-2„ „ s- \\... .,-.0 v .. ...- N, \ , t..,, , -‘,„,.. ... .... £ % , ,, \ , . ..-• „..,. \ , \ ..-- \ \ 4\3‘.......-__ .„, \\:- . \ ...•'' .„. ,.ii.:. \ r- . \ ..,c,.... ..", \ •\\#1\ , . . . . I v.=as .oracsr.+..e^aErr•TVICIt ,.:47, -.-.s'S+¢ReY1/4"4" "'l? • 410 Page 7/EAGAN ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES JUNE 25, 1991 Commission Member Graves arrived at the meeting. SMZILA Y=GANN, DVM Chairman Voracek opened the next public hearing of theeing a regarding a Conditional Use Permit to allow a veterinary clinic Community Shopping Center zoning district. City Planner Jim Sturm presented a brief background of this application. Sheila Megan, the applicant, stated she was there to answer any questions. Commission Member Staeheli asked if any animals would be permitted answered outside of the any boarding of any o animals. Commission Member Miller requested that a condition be added that prohibits outside storage or display of animals. Staeheli moved, Trygg seconded, motion to approve a Conditional Use Permit to allow a veterinary clinic in a Community Shopping Center zoning district, subject to the following conditions: 1. No boarding of animals other than those requiring medical treatment. 2. All other applicable City Codes and requirements. 3. No outside storage or display of any animal. All present voted in favor. s=EMOELLER & DATES Chairman Voraoekofop��tdto split next a taxpublic parcel of the regarding a Waiver ownership. City ls, but this the stated that the parcels, but tb Stryker Addition will be coming before the Advisory Planning Commission soon regarding final platting. • BOd SSZ bZ:iT i6. TO "1l! • ! Page 8 EAGAN ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES JUNE 25, 1991 Bryce Huemoeller, representing the applicant, stated that the reason they are asking for this air right split is to simplify the legal arrangements between the shopping center and the apartment. Commission Member Merkley asked if by granting this waiver of plat they would be approving the final plat for Stryker Addition. Mr. Huemoeller stated that they know this will not act as an approval for the final plat. Commission Member Markley requested a condition be added that states the final platting of Stryker Addition must be completed before the waiver of plat goes into effect. Merkley moved, Trygg seconded, notion to approve a Waiver of Plat to split a tax parcel for individual ownership, subject to the following conditions: 1. The waiver of plat shall be recorded within 60 days of Council action, with documentation provided to the City. • 2. Complete final platting of Stryker Addition. All present voted in favor. KIDDLEMIBT PROPERTIES Chairman Voracek opened the next public hearing of the evening regarding a Preliminary Plat consisting of four Single Family lots on 4 .22 acres of previously-zoned R-1 land. City Planner Jim Sturm stated that this application would take five lots and replat it into four lots. There are no problems that he is aware of. Robert Middlemist, the applicant, stated that he hoped the City will keep its fees to a minimum. He further stated that he had a problem with standard conditions Cl, C2 and Dl. Assistant City Engineer Mike Foertsch answered Mr. Middlemist's concerns regarding the standard conditions. Commission Member Markley requested that a condition be added which stated that existing easements be vacated within Lots 7, 8 & 9, Block 1, Manor Lake Addition and Lots 1 6 2, Block 5, Manor Lake 2nd Addition. • 60d TSZ PE:TT T6, TO TII JUL 11 '91 15:36 -LEMMLLEP & BATES AAAAAAAAAAAA P.2 HUEMOELLER & BATES ATTORNEYS AT LAW • 76670 FRANKLIN TRAIL • on pna•OX 67 PRIOR LAKE.MINNESOTA S5372 VMES 0.RATES Telephone(6123 447.2171 'array 0.MUEMOELLER Te'Kepler(6121 44T-5626 July 11, 1991 • Mr. Jim Sturm, City Planner City of Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55122-1897 Re: D.C.R. Company - Waiver of Plat Application No. 19-W-3-5-91 Dear Mr. Sturm: I am writing to request that the hearing on this matter, presently scheduled to be heard by the Eagan City Counsel on July 16, 1991, be indefinitely continued for the following reasons: 1. To permit the D.C.R. Company to further evaluate the proposed connection and availability charges as set forth on page • 2 of the June 19, 1991 report of the Community Development Department; and 2. To allow this application to be processed concurrently with the plat of Stryker Addition. Please confirm by telephone that the matter has been continued and call if you have questions or need further information. Sincerely ours, 4 f Bryce,b . Huemoeller HDH:ab cc: D.C.R. Company Ronald A. Zamansky, Esq. • Agenda Information Memo • July 16, 1991 City Council Meeting PRELIMINARY PLAT/S TODD RAPP ADDITION/MIDDLEMIST PROPERTIES H. Preliminary Plat, S Todd Rapp Addition/Middlemist Properties,Consisting of 4 Single- Family Lots Within the Manor Lake Addition Located Along the West Side of Manor Lake in the Northeast Quarter of Section 36--At its regular meeting of June 25, 1991, the Advisory Planning Commission considered the above-referenced preliminary plat application. For additional information in this regard, please ref r to the Co unity Development Department staff report which is enclosed on ?pies (3d through l for your review. Also enclosed on pages 1 .2 through 13'r is a copy of the Planning Commission minutes in this regard. The APC is recommending approval. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny a preliminary plat for the S Todd Rapp Addition/Middlemist Properties located within the Manor Lake Addition as presented. • S SUBJECT: PRELIMINARY PLAT (S. TODD RAPP ADDITION) APPLICANT: MIDDLEMIST PROPERTIES LOCATION: LOTS 7-9, BLOCK 1, MANOR LAKE ADD. LOTS 1 & 2, BLOCK 5, MANOR LAKE 2ND ADD. EXISTING ZONING: R-1 (SINGLE FAMILY) DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: JUNE 25, 1991 DATE OF REPORT: JUNE 13, 1991 COMPILED BY: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT APPLICATION SUMMARY: An application has been submitted requesting a Preliminary Plat consisting of four Single Family lots on 4.22 acres of previously-zoned R-1 land. The proposal calls for five existing lots to be replatted into four lots. COMMENTS: All four lots proposed will back up to Manor Lake. The applicant is proposing the replat to create bigger lots that will accommodate large homes. All lots are over 100' in width at the setback line and the lot area ranges between .67 acres and 1.4 acres. Both R-1 lot area and lot width minimum requirements are exceeded with this proposal. The replat consists of three lots platted with Manor Lake Addition which was approved in May of 1988 and two lots platted with Manor Lake 2nd Addition which was approved in February of 1990. WATER QUALITY: Staff does not deem a water quality dedication necessary because the five lots involved were previously platted and the replat calls for a less dense development on the property in question. • • GRADING/DRAINAGE/EROSION CONTROL: Grading for S. Todd Rapp Addition will • not be necessary since this property was graded originally through the platting of Manor Lake Addition. Therefore, additional erosion control will not be necessary beyond what is required during the home construction process. In addition, any deviation from the already established drainage patterns would be extremely minimal and would simply result in drainage swales being relocated to the proposed property lines. This relocation should be identified on a final detailed grading plan prior to final plat approval. UTILITIES: Additional sanitary sewer and watermain will not be necessary since these utilities were provided through the platting of Manor Lake and Manor Lake 2nd Additions. The existing sanitary sewer and water service provided for Lot 9, Block 5, Manor Lake Addition and should be abandoned to include shutting off the water at the corporation. The remaining services would be able to service the 4 lots of the S. Todd Rapp Addition. A minor storm sewer modification will be necessary to realign the system with the proposed plat. The existing storm sewer, manhole and flared end section will need to be relocated from the common property lines of Lot 9, Block 1, Manor Lake Addition and Lot 1, Block 5, Manor Lake 2nd Addition to the proposed common property lines of Lot 2 and 3, Block 1, S. Todd Rapp Addition. STREETS/ACCESS/CIRCULATION: Streets, access and circulation for S. Todd Rapp Addition will remain unchanged from what was installed through the platting of Manor Lake and Manor Lake 2nd Additions. It is anticipated that there will not be any significant changes through the elimination of the one lot. • EASEMENTS/RIGHT-OF-WAY/PERMITS: All required easements including an easement of sufficient width based on depth of storm sewer will be dedicated as a part of the plat. In addition, all existing easements within Lots 7, 8 & 9, Block 1, Manor Lake Addition and Lots 1 & 2, Block 5, Manor Lake 2nd Addition will need to be vacated with the proposed S. Todd Rapp Addition. The development will be responsible for insuring that all regulatory agency permits are obtained prior to final plat approval. FINANCIAL OBLIGATION Based upon the study of the financial obligations collected in the past and the uses proposed for the property, the following charges are proposed. The charges are computed using the City's existing fee schedule and connections proposed to be made to the City's utility system based on the submitted plans. Improvement Project Use Rate Quantity Amount • None SO S. TODD RAPP ADDITION CONDITIONS: 1. These standard conditions of plat approval as adopted by Council action on July 110 10, 1990 shall be complied with: B1, B2, B4, Cl, C2, D1, El, and H1 2. A final detailed grading plan is required for staff review prior to Final Plat approval. 3. The development is required to relocate the existing storm sewer common to Lot 9, Block 1, Manor Lake Addition, and Lot 1, Block 5, Manor Lake 2nd Addition, to the common lot line of proposed Lots 2 and 3, Block 1, S.Todd Rapp Addition. • STANDARD CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL A. Financial Obligations 1. This development shall accept its additional financial obligations as defined in the staff 's report in accordance with the final plat dimensions and the rates in effect at the time of final plat approval . B. Easements and Rights-of-Way 1. This development shall dedicate 10 ' drainage and utility easements centered over all common lot lines and adjacent to private property or public right-of-way. 2 . This development shall dedicate, provide, or financially guarantee the acquisition costs of additional drainage, ponding, and utility easements as required by the alignment, depth, and storage capacity of all required public utilities and streets located beyond the boundaries of this plat or outside of dedicated public right-of-way as necessary to service this development or accommodate it. 3 . This development shall dedicate all public right-of-way and temporary slope easements for ultimate development of adjacent roadways as required by the appropriate jurisdictional agency. 4 . This development shall dedicate adequate drainage and ponding easements to incorporate the required high water elevation necessitated by City storm water storage volume requirements. C. Plans and Specifications 1 . All public streets and utilities necessary to provide service to this development shall be designed by a registered professional engineer in accordance with City codes, engineering standards, guidelines and policies. 2. A detailed grading, drainage, erosion, and sediment control plan must be prepared in accordance with current City standards prior to final plat approval. 3 . This development shall insure that all temporary dead end public streets shall have a cul-de-sac constructed in accordance with City engineering standards. w 3 STANDARD CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL PAGE TWO 4 . A detailed landscape plan shall be submitted on the proposed grading plan. The financial guarantee shall be included in the Development Contract and not be released until one year after the date of installation. 5. All internal public and private streets shall be constructed within the required right-of-way in accordance with City Code and engineering standards. D. Public Improvements 1 . If any public improvements are to be installed under a City contract, the appropriate project must be approved at a formal public hearing by Council action prior to final plat approval . E. Permits 1 . This development shall be responsible for the acquisition of all regulatory agency permits in the time frame required by the affected agency., F. Parks and Trails Dedication 1 . This development shall fulfill its parks dedication requirements as recommended by the Advisory Parks and 410 Recreation Commission and approved by Council action. G. Water Ouality Dedication 1 . This development shall be responsible for providing a cash dedication in addition to/in lieu of ponding requirements in accordance with the criteria identified in the City's Water Quality Management Plan. H. Other 1. All standard platting and zoning conditions shall be adhered to unless specifically granted a variance by Council action. Advisory planning Commission City Council Approved: August 25, 1987 September 15, 1987 Revised: July 10, 1990 plataprv.con LTS *2 5(1 • RD. (CLIFF . Nunui No se Ar1ANORF r � W , rl - � ; W ; t z I! _i it x4 L 1 i d_ 3 . 1� is • c af, 1 fz 1. ♦ E iQ t:i W g_1 f BE • E �Is js 1:ri I CO i i Q 211 gSW W I I is r i . .r•:} .. I : Li g t- >t t I 14 f::: 0. m 5:::: • V Iw 0 i Az F- I y ▪ r~ o _ 0 at IL ot o r-�` • N,tl1�i"'. ♦ r il {.1 `—ity.�1 r r.t ..t tt.tt.t.1 • ..xr 1'''. 1 io /^ \\ S _; V i Jam'/ ,'i �1.141u:- r : .u• 1 i i ti i t [U \ i i / ; t I ails 1 t W M `, `trr '- Lam: / t f �� ' ..4. .tri 1a 0 1 i li • W r /T`- �u.r` -' 7�-- • / c) 1 1 . .,' I I 1 7 // • Z I , ;1,+' Cv'. O i 1 r / I .r`i I m I i! / 1 0j 1 I .... • 4 / i 1 0' { 1 •�4 ••a I r, 1 % I ,fir W •A / I / rte. I •/ •A • 0Lo - • Page 8/EAGAN ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES JUNE 25, 1991 Bryce Huemoeller, representing the applicant, stated that the reason they are asking for this air right split is to simplify the legal arrangements between the shopping center and the apartment. Commission Member Merkley asked if by granting this waiver of plat they would be approving the final plat for Stryker Addition. Mr. Huemoeller stated that they know this will not act as an approval for the final plat. Commission Member Merkley requested a condition be added that states the final platting of Stryker Addition must be completed before the waiver of plat goes into effect. Merkley moved, Trygg seconded, motion to approve a Waiver of Plat to split a tax parcel for individual ownership, subject to the following conditions: 1. The waiver of plat shall be recorded within 60 days of Council action, with documentation provided to the City. IIM 2. Complete final platting of Stryker Addition. All present voted in favor. KIDDLEEIST PROPERTIES Chairman Voracek opened the next public hearing of the evening regarding a Preliminary Plat consisting of four Single Family lots on 4.22 acres of previously-zoned R-1 land. City Planner Jim Sturm stated that this application would take five lots and replat it into four lots. There are no problems that he is aware of. Robert Middlemist, the applicant, stated that he hoped the City will keep its fees to a minimum. He further stated that he had a problem with standard conditions Cl, C2 and D1. Assistant City Engineer Mike Foertech answered Mr. Middlemist's concerns regarding the standard conditions. commission Member Merkley requested that a condition be added which stated that existing easements be vacated within Lots 7, 8 & 9, Block 1, Manor Lake Addition and Lots 1 & 2, Block 5, Manor Lake 2nd Addition. 60d TSZ bZ i T i6. i0 •Ylf 3 . • Page 9/EAGAN ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES JUNE 25, 1991 Trygg moved, Stasheli seconded, the motion to approve a Preliminary Plat consisting of four Single Family lots on 4.22 acres of previously-zoned R-1 land, subject to the following conditions: 1. ouncil standard action onconditions July 10,o1990 plat shallapproval complied with: B1, 82, B4, Cl, C2, Dl, E1 and Ml 2. A final detailed grading plan is required for staff review prior to Final Plat approval. 3. The development is required to relocate the existing storm sewer common to Lot 9, Block 1, Manor Lake Addition, and Lot 1, Block 5, Manor Lake 2nd Addition, to the common lot line of proposed Lots 2 and 3, Block 1, S. Todd Rapp Addition. illio` Vacating existing easements of Lots 7, 8 & 9, Block 1, Manor Lake Addition and Lots 1 & 2, Block 5, Manor Lake 2nd Addition. ' All present voted in favor. GOLDEN MEADOW Chairman Voracek opened the last public hearing of the evening regarding the Preliminary Plat of three lots on approximately 1.9 acres. City Planner Jim Sturm stated that this application will extend the lot lines which will add square footage to the development but no actual development will take place. With this application the easements will not have to be vacated. There were no concerns by city staff, Pat e hborsostating thaththeyphave nno�problems with approvingf the n this ig request. Miller moved, Graves seconded, the motion to approve a Preliminary Plat of three lots on approximately 1.9 acres, subject to the following conditions: 1. ' Council action on July of plat approval 0, shll becompli adopted ed o with: III Did TSZ 5c? SZ:TT T6. TO -rll b Agenda Information Memo • July 16, 1991 City Council Meeting PRELIMINARY PLAT/GOLDEN MEADOW ADDITION I. Preliminary Plat, Golden Meadow Addition/Todd, Mereness & Percy, Consisting of 3 Lots on Approximately 1.86 Acres of PD/R1 (Planned Development/Single-Family) Zoned Land Located on the West Side of Dodd Road, North of Golden Meadow Road in the Northwest Quarter of Section 25--At its regular meeting of June 25, 1991, the Advisory Planning Commission considered the above-referenced application for a preliminary plat. For additional information with respect to this application, please r e to the Co nity Development Department staff report w( X i 's enclosed on Rages ( °through for your review. Also enclosed on pages through /1-fc is a copy of the Planning Commission minutes in this regard. The APC is recommending approval of this application. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny a preliminary plat application for Golden Meadow Addition consisting of 3 lots located on the west side of Dodd Road, north of Golden Meadow Road as presented. • • SUBJECT: PRELIMINARY PLAT GOLDEN MEADOW ADDITION • APPLICANT: TODD, MERENESS, & PERCY LOCATION: OUTLOT A, OVERVIEW ESTATES REPLAT (P.I.D. #10-56210-010-00) EXISTING ZONING: PD, R-1 (PLANNED DEVELOPMENT, SINGLE FAMILY) DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: JUNE 25, 1991 DATE OF REPORT: JUNE 14, 1991 COMPILED BY: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT APPLICATION SUMMARY: An application has been submitted requesting a Preliminary Plat of three lots on approximately 1.9 acres. The specific request is to plat Outlot A with Lots 8, 9, and 10, Overview Estates Replat, extending the rear lot lines of these lots to the northernmost lot line of Outlot A. BACKGROUND: Outlot A, Overview Estates Replat, was to be platted with whatever development occurred to the north of it. When Dodd Farm Addition was platted, it was not incorporated. Outlot A went tax forfeiture and was purchased by the three property owners to the south (Lots 8, 9, and 10). At the May 23, 1991 City Council meeting, the applicants of this plat requested that the Council waive the development fees associated with this plat. The Council waived all fees except the preliminary and final application fees and the $1,500 Preliminary Plat escrow fee. EXISTING CONDITIONS: The site is located west of Dodd Road, north of Golden Meadow Road, approximately 150'east of Stirrup Street, and south of Dodd Farm Addition. Lots 8, 9, and 10 have existing single family dwelling units. All of the lots are served by City utilities. The Comprehensive Guide Plan designates this area as D-1 (0-3 units/acre, Single Family). When Outlot A is combined with the existing lots, the new lot sizes will be as follows: Lot 1: 25,992 sq. ft. Lot 2: 25,979 sq. ft. Lot 3: 29,164 sq. ft. / Lie' GRADING/DRAINAGE/EROSION CONTROL: No site grading will be performed in • conjunction with platting of this property. The drainage of the site will continue to be from the backyards of the lots which are high to the front yard. UTILITIES: Sanitary sewer and water main service is available to all four lots and each lot is connected to the City's sanitary sewer and water system. STREETS/ACCESS/CIRCULATION: Each lot has access to a dedicated public street. This development will not increase the traffic to the public streets in this area. EASEMENTS/RIGHT-OF-WAY/PERMITS: No additional right-of-way requirements and permits are anticipated with this development. This development shall dedicate 10' drainage and utility easements centered over all common lot lines and adjacent to private property or public right-of-way. WATER QUALITY: Staff has determined that there are no water quality fees charged with the replatting of this property. • FINANCIAL OBLIGATION - GOLDEN MEADOW ADDITION Based upon the study of the financial obligations collected in the past and the uses proposed for the property, the following charges are proposed. The charges are computed using the City's existing fee schedule and connections proposed to be made to the City's-utility system based on the submitted plans. Improvement Project Use Rate Quantity Amount Various $19,400 The property owners desire to split Outlot A of Overview Estates Replat and combine with their existing parcels. Outlot A was a tax forfeit parcel which had S19,400 in special assessments outstanding at time of forfeiture. The City Staff has notified the applicants by letter that this amount is an obligation that must be satisfied. Satisfaction can be remedied by each of applicants signing a Waiver of Assessment allowintg the City to certify 1/3 of the above amount to each of the newly created parcels. • q CONDITIONS FOR GOLDEN MEADOW ADDITION 1. These standard conditions of plat approval as adopted by Council action on July 10, 1990 shall be complied with: Al, B1, and H1 2. This plat shall be recorded with Dakota County. 3. These lots shall not be further divided. • 1 o-- STANDARD CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL A. Financial Obligations • 1 . This development shall accept its additional financial obligations as defined in the staff 's report in accordance with the final plat dimensions and the rates in effect at the time of final plat approval. B. Xasements and Rights-of-Way 1. This development shall dedicate 10' drainage and utility easements centered over all common lot lines and adjacent to private property or public right-of-way. 2 . This development shall dedicate, provide, or financially guarantee the acquisition costs of additional drainage, ponding, and utility easements as required by the alignment, depth, and storage capacity of all required public utilities and streets located beyond the boundaries of this plat or outside of dedicated public right-of-way as necessary to service this development or accommodate it. 3 . This development shall dedicate all public right-of-way and temporary slope easements for ultimate development of adjacent roadways as required by the appropriate jurisdictional agency. 4 . This development shall dedicate adequate drainage and ponding easements to incorporate the required high water elevation necessitated by City storm water storage volume requirements. C. Plans and Specifications 1 . All public streets and utilities necessary to provide service to this development shall be designed by a registered professional engineer in accordance with City codes, engineering standards, guidelines and policies. 2. A detailed grading, drainage, erosion, and sediment control plan must be prepared in accordance with current City standards prior to final plat approval. 3 . This development shall insure that all temporary dead end public streets shall have a cul-de-sac constructed in accordance with City engineering standards. np425 STANDARD CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL PAGE TWO 4 . A detailed landscape plan shall be submitted on the • proposed grading plan. The financial guarantee shall be included in the Development Contract and not be released until one year after the date of installation. 5. All internal public and private streets shall be constructed within the required right-of-way in accordance with City Code and engineering standards. D. Public Improvements 1 . If any public improvements are to be installed under a City contract, the appropriate project must be approved at a formal public hearing by Council action prior to final plat approval . E. Permits 1 . This development shall be responsible for the acquisition of all regulatory agency permits in the time frame required by the affected agency.. F. Parks and Trails Dedication 1 . This development shall fulfill its parks dedication requirements as recommended by the Advisory Parks and 40 Recreation Commission and approved by Council action. G. Water Ouality Dedication 1. This development shall be responsible for providing a cash dedication in addition to/in lieu of ponding requirements in accordance with the criteria identified in the City's Water Quality Management Plan. H. Other 1. All standard platting and zoning conditions shall be adhered to unless specifically granted a variance by Council action. Advisory Planning Commission City Council Approved: August 25, 1987 September 15, 1987 Revised: July 10, 1990 plataprv.con LTS #2 1 44 S I I '� \'S ; CA3A, D .' C./ 4. C:RCLE � ' 0 I d_rift 3-----__ -- ..„...i yy .917:11 E". o<eCel .• gyvJ v.oCK LK ORE .N L• .: NE ..a1�c`�ryY�S ' 1991 Street Map e k a "4. 4 TA:v i AKES-OE L 10g a: • TORV PARK P I R.a . ... . . t�2 hW,r. L ` 4A .; . GR -41,:irij ,r-♦ P I ( \ i s v LA., d Ad • 311 ...L........—_ -1 R° rl l't, xx (ii' ' ., "%`"1 1s 1 Pi:► �� .,� N I.- '• C' ; II ' I t^ii r.i; tr .Y1/TEE I.Elvv�rI' ;•: • ,'�� •��nh 10 if 1991 Zoning Map � .� I.II ., .�iur' I PK • It�r'. ii-Ji! •'ifs =Mu i M. scHwNa LM( - -, � .'i/j' OAK \� �►. + �� 1;� . {. t! �/j Y• t: V. POND ,K;r♦...11`0`�'`' 3V-J 1 '�' '�:'`-f ^ `di1•' al• id'st�`f� 1�i, ,"fl ii, , ., - ... 1 ,•Eu II D-1 °p - of i114 - •,... II I PF ® Du��f, nc 1991 Comp.. Guide Plan Map , • 1 p p p-,00 1 ) °P 4 ATI I pi IF rA I IN I I 1 I I I•PM id7 • Aloki 1'D.I -- G� ffr� ,.....,..).) II iik • I (4(1: --- --,?. .1 IL. 'km Pita Atithk Prepared By: DELMAR H. SCHWANZ (AND SURVEYORS.INC. . R.gNMr.O Under Laws of Tres State of Minnesota 14750 SOUTH ROBERT TRAIL ROSEMOUNT,MINNESOTA 55068 812/423-1769 SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE , ril ..- / ` I t c S H. r /�v '/ I Scale: 1 inch = 100 f 40 Drainage & Utility EaseWts -'r L _ ___/j r.:...�.... : K'l 72988: IaR..•:. � Q .. � :�::� Qutlot A to be . . . . ..... incorporated. ao;:':•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:: 4. a. .:.:.:...:.:.:.:.•...•.I..I.......•.•.•..:.::::::::::•.•'•. 1: ':•. #:• Present and proposed . ............. :.. : a ' 'zoning R-1, PD :6J::. :.:...�,::':•:•:•:•:•• ��:•:} ...�.. .....—.....3............9!1. n< :1:4::::•.•t•.•.•.:..:1:::...::.:.: -.: . New lot sizes �•••• •.•k -. - - F- r- — —` -1 , -i I — Lot 1 25,992 Sq. ft. �- I� IN 1 Lot 2 25,979 Sq. ft. hl I 1 / Lot 3 29,164 Sg. ft. I _ x / i' L' .. 1..e- I I I I ' NOTES: e. �-\ I a I I I I I! 1. There is a single ily (� t / ' 1 1O0 �I 100 _ _1 1- 94.76 J residence on each the �_ — — platted lots. 'I_ 2. All lots are served by G&LDE N MEADOW T lR,OA — city utilities. 3. No site grading will be Ir\ �, 50 done in conjunction wit' I I I I platting this property. I 1 I . Preliminary plat: GOLDEN MEADOW ADDITION Owners/ Developers: Patricia & Willard Percy Lot 8, Block 2, OVERVIEW ESTATES REPLAT 745 Golden Meadow Road Eagan, MN 55123 Lynn & Steve Mereness Lot 9, Block 2, OVERVIEW ESTATES REPLAT 735 Golden Meadow Road Eagan, MN 55123 Patricia & John Todd Lot 10, Block 2, OVERVIEW ESTATES REPLAT 731 Golden Meadow Road Eagan, MN 55123 Dakota County HRA Outlot A, OVERVIEW ESTATi I hereby certify that this survey,plan,or report was Rosemount, MN. REPL. prepared by me or under my direct supervision and • that I am a duly Registered Land Surveyor under /^) 7/1 .;t,i_.r.d.•1 / the laws of the State of Minnesota. K.�' / _ • Delmar H. Schwartz , Dated 05-30-91 1 Minnesota Registration No. 8625 r _. ,., [........... Oil A. ii Prepared By: DELMAIR H. SCHWANZ III lAND SURVEYORS.INC. Re9letend Under LM of The Mete of MInn.eote 14750 SOUTH ROBERT TRAIL ROSEMOUNT,MINNESOTA 55068 612/423-1769 SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE r) v 1 _ / ` I 1 1.." I I I I ‘\\\\\\ rt I ' / _JI '1 Scale: 1 inch = 100 1. * _ _ I !� Drainagl+ & Utilttty EaEetr nts ' Jj_... _ _' 40 cr) ii:. i: •: : . r .............. .... . , € t : �:: :"'"'"":: ::.:: :• :: Present and proposed :::: S ;.� zoning R-1, PD•ir ,:.* :,Yi' 11th* '• .:::::. .., New lot sizes .fit ;; is Lot 1 25,992 Sq. ft. :l:; Lot 2 25,979 Sq. ft. ,•:::::•::::: Lot 3 29,164 Sg. ft illp ,- ' /11�. �, V Fs / NOTES: ,� u ; :; ;' # t::. ::: :: 1. There is a single famil• '::::::::::::1.00::.:::::g.. . :':':'L�'A. :' :::.. #.......:.:.:440:s:::... ..• t,: . residence on each of tt platted lots. �t a 1�� ,I 2. All lots are served by GGL-BEN MEADOW i city utilities. CI 1, CI 1- 1 —� 50 3. No site grading will bE I I Imo\ 1'- done in conjunction wit platting this property. 1 / Preliminary plat: GOLDEN MEADOW ADDITION FINANCIAL OBLIGATION RELATED TO TAX FORFEIT AMOUNTS III 41 - . Page 9/EAGAN ADVISORY PLANNING COMMION MINUTES JUNE 25, 1991 j 1 Trygg moved, Stasheli seconded, the motion to approve a Preliminary Plat consisting of four S4ngle Family lots on 4.22 acres of previously-zoned R-1 Iand, subject to the following conditions: 1. These standard conditions ofiplat approval as adopted by Council action on July 104\ 490 shall be complied with: B1, 82, B4 , Cl, C2, Dl, E1 alpd Ni 2. A final detailed grading play is required for staff review prior to Final Plat approval.' 3. The development is required to relocate the existing storm sewer common to Lot 9, Block,l, Manor Lake Addition, and Lot 1, Block 5, Manor Lake 2nd A ldition, to the common lot line of proposed Lots -and 3; k 1, S. Todd Rapp Addition. 4 . Vacating existing easements f Lots 7, 8 & 9, Block 1, Manor Lake Addition and ,Locs 1 & 2 Block 5, Manor Lake 2nd rT Addition. • All present voted in favor. R_. SpLDEN MEADow Chairman Voracek opened the last public hearing of the evening regarding the Preliminary Plat of tE ee lots on approximately 1.9 acres. F City Planner Jim Sturm stated that this application will extend the lot lines which will add square footage to the development but no actual development will take place. With this application the easements will not have to lye-vacate -L There were no concerns by city staff. sj r. I Pat Todd, one of teypn ,pioblems with petition pproving this neighbors stating that e they have no request. ;. Miller Plat, Graves eeslotsdon,approximately ximately 1.9pacres, subject to Preliminary Plat of _ the following conditions: 1. - These standard conditions ofEplat approval as adopted by Council action on July 10, 1990, shall be complied with: ;,~ sun, . 0td TSZ 1 SE TT T6. TO Ttf 4 Page 10/EAGAN ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES JUNE 25, 1991 Al, B1 and E1 2. This plat shall be recorded with Dakota County. 3. These lots shall not be further divided. All present voted in favor. ADJOURNMENT Miller moved, Markley seconded, the motion to adjourn the June 25, 1991 Advisory Planning Commission meeting at 9:20 p.m. All voted in favor. Secretary - Eagan Advisory Planning Commission • TTd TSZ 92 TT T6, TO lar 1 A. d July 9, 1991 TO: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES FROM: ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT WITT RE: GAMBLING LICENSE APPLICATION for Minnesota Valley Humane Society to conduct pull-tab operation at Durnings 4625 Nicols Rd. The Minnesota Valley Humane Society has applied for a Class B, Pull-tab license. The Society hopes to have a pull-tab operation at Durnings Restaurant, 4625 Nicols Rd, Eagan. Gerry Meszaros is reviewing the application and will provide you with a report as soon as his investigation is completed - sometime this week. • 1-02t1 Fon BOARD USE OtiLY Ammo `FF - y (1 IFCIC ---- • DATE Lnrrrrru[ Gambling _--- Premise Permit Application - Part 1 — OrgcirtizatiOri Irt, ohrictti it . I g �I tlnrnn nl g - � Or nntzation Minnesota Valley Humane Society nil,,,,,t Arfrtrrtris of Organlrertlnn -Sttnnt nr P 0 Any(no not into nrtdrnee of gambling mnnnanr) ------------------ -------1313 East Highway 13 State Zip Code t,nnnt Burnsville __ Minnesota y Rir�inQas(,hn„nnunih�r ll.im�nt rhinl nrr.r•t�tivn oHlrnr (cllrlr)nt fin gnmbllny nlnnno-nr) 55337 1 )ta - (612) 894-5000 Ru irt�ss phony!nun,h;:.r Jacki Virginja Zsci1okke President ^'''i'n" -- -- (612 ) 626-6023 of rhinf ft olOr-Ar -Serene or P O. Am( --— '---------- 119 Chap rrel Drive r-;ii - —ate---- ---- na; county Minnesota 55124 Dakota e df pp. > ort i ( in,s of Premise Permit '. - — ..._:___L•__.. ( ] r,lasq A— Fee Bingo, Rafflaq, raririlowlinglq, liph^arriq, (tuft-tabs $200 I rlaeq A -- Ralflen, ParfrilawhAAlq, Tipbnarris, f ull t bs —_. _-- ---___ S 1$125 The class of prr-mise permit �^e C— I lrigo only X100 must be reflected by class of I I ''l ` l'cn D - Raffleq only the organization license. $75 Bingo Occasions If class A or C, fill in days and btglnning and ending hours of bingo occasions: No more than seven bingo occasions may be Conducted by an organization per week. ft'Y new onto Q/Emit nQ fionrq Cloy Arg1nntrta/Ending flours Dny lc¢tnntng /Ending fining — — to _- - to ---- -- - to to ——-- --'--------- 7‘17.777.77.7:71 + . 2 y� X w > �^ + r w wro if 13t n , z > > l a j Status of Premise permit - cheek one: .1 tinw promise—Pill In bog organization premise permit number 03292 I 1 Renewal of existing premise permrl--rill in f•QfjDISjQ premise permit number 1 1 f'rnvlotrnfy expired pf omits permit—Fill In sotZL@L@ premise pArmfl number _ I • Minnesota Laut ice Gambling Premise Permit Application - Part 2 Gainbt, •• :wue wit"? Name of establishment where gambling will be conducted Street Address(do not use a post office box number) Durnings Spirits & Prime Fare 4625 Nicols Road Eagan, Minnesota 55122 Is the premises Iodated within dty Omits? E]yes D no City and County where gambling premises is located OR Township and County where gambling premises Is located if outside of city limit, Eagan, Dakota County Name and Address of legal Owner of Premises City State Zip Code Dorola, Inc. 4625 Nicols Road 'Eagan Minnesota 55122 Does the organization own the building where the gambling will be conducted? DYES ®NO NOTE:Organizations may not pay thbmselVes rent if they own the building or have a holding company. A letter must be sub- mitted showing rent payments as Arc)from garttbling funds it the organization's holding company owns the premises. The letter must be signed by the chief executive officer.) It NO, attach thtl following: ' e cbpy of the lease with terms for one year. • a copy of a sketch of the floor plan with dimensions, showing what portion is being leased. A lease and sketch are not required for Class b appilcantions. Bent: For gambling with bingo $ Total square footage leased For gambling Without bingo $ $1,000/mo. Total square footage leased 24 Address of storage space of gambflng equipment Address City State Zip code 1313 East Hi•hway 13 Burnsville Minnesota 55337 411 < ;11:4; 9 �1gY. , 1. (Baca!some', • gsn;'ng;ram des mum sae a separate ec I ig account) Bank Name Bank Account Number American Bank of Burnsville 003 454 2 Bank Address City State Zip Code 301 Burnsville Parkway Burnsville Minnesota 55337 Name, addess, and Otis of persons authorize„to sign d'hecks and make deposits and withdrawals. —}dame Address Title Jacqueline Zsclhokke 119 Chaparrel Drive Apple Valley, MN President Trudi Johnson-Richards 3295 Victoria Street Shoreview, MN Secretary is Charles Peck, D.V.M. , 13740 Nicollet Avenue Burnsville, MN Board of Directors Beverly Shannon 13313 Lakeview Drive Burnsville, MN Board of Directors Mitittesdta Lawfef Gambling Premise Permit Application - Part 3 ACIt1 L . ► 7rT.7177 n e Gambling Site AathOriz*tion I hearby consent that local law enforcement officer*,the board or agents of the board,or the commissioner of revenue or public safety,or agents of the comrrildblon*M, may enter the prombsa to enforce the law. Bank Records Ltfotflmatltin The board Is authdrtzed tb inspect the bank tecordl bf the gambling Aocbunt whenever necessary to fulfill requirements of current gambling rulei and law. I declare that: I have read this application And all information submitted to the board; All Information is thus, accurate end complete; All other required infotmatfon has besrt fully disclosed; I am the chief et(eeutfve officer of the organisation; i assume full resporibfblttty fof the fair and lawful gambling and rules of the board and agree, if licensed, to abide by thirsts laws and rules, Including amendments to them; A meMbetshlp Mot of the organization*ill be available Within seven days after It Is requested by the board; Any changes in application Infdtm*tlon will be subntrtt`d to the board and local government within 10 days of the change; and A termination plan Will be submitted to the board within 15 days of the termination of all premise permits. Failure tO provide required information or providing false information may result In the denial or revocation of the license. Signature of chief executive offioer a Date r< LOC �') lie Y €' �' ` y(y $t2 Sty 11-, y, 1 �t :MD).,Sr !'�csi` > >s� •� - t..ris a.•+1r iM� �f�4 f� W )l 1l :�7i1}I f1 5 a t • .....�.. . •r.... .wA. �:.:: r�...',•.A�a✓`Ct.��.... �r. .'� � e�j,�s ..... 1. The city'must sign if the garnbfing pterhfefs 14 tbt ated tkithin city(emits. 2. The county"AND Itt*nehip••MUM sigh If the gemblhig pterrilseN Is located within a to*nship. 3. The local government (city 6t boUfity)must bast I fellblutieh Speeificalty approving or denying the application. 4. A copy of the resolution epprodlrlg the applittetbh must be attached to the application. 5. Applications Which are denied by the boar gtiemtng body should not be submitted to the Gambling Control Division. Township: By signature below,the township acknowledges that the organization is applying for a premises permit within township limits. City*or County Township** City or County Name Township Name Eagan Signstu,l)of person reeetvfng applcation Signature of person receiving application Tide Date Reoefw J ! 'd l I Tide i Dare Received C l CY.,ivir !a-A. i s r 1-'_'i _/.�•, f .< Y 11 Person deJvering application bTocaIgoverrngtody fete Dean Weigel 6/27/91 Is township: ❑Organized 0 Unorganized ❑Unincorporated Refer to the Instructlbne for the required ittechments Mall to: Department of Gaming • Gambling Control Division Rosewood Plaza South, 3rd Floor 1711 W. County Road B Posevilln, MN 55113 -7,7 police department LSPATRICK of oEAGA, " c i t y of ca an KENNETH D.ASZMANN Operations Caotam 1 ' 3830 Pilot Knob Road THOM Eagan, Minnesota 55122 ASoEGAN Phone: (612)454-3900 FAX: (612)454-0718 McCREA DAVID K. SON PAMELA cCRE TIM PAWLENTY THEODORE WACHTER Counci;Members THOS HE City MA Adm in ist,aEDGtor S TO: POLICE CHIEF PAT GEAGAN EUGENE VAN OVERBEKE City Cle,k FROM: LT. JERRY MESZAROB RE: PERMIT TO BELL PULL-TABS AT DURNINGS DATE: JULY 11, 1991 The Minnesota Valley Humane Society, 1313 East Highway 13, Burnsville, MN, has applied for a gambling permit to sell pull tabs at Durning's Spirits and Prime Fare, 4625 Nicols Road, Eagan. I have reviewed the state application forms with Dean Weigel, the gambling manager for the Minnesota Valley Humane Society, and with Dean Truer, bar manager of Durning's. I find the ap- plications to be accurate and complete. Mr. Truer showed me the area in the bar where the pull tabs will be sold. This area will not be remodeled until there is approval of the permit. I did a records check on Durning's Bar for the past year and did not find any gambling violations. Based on information available to me through my investigation, I find no reason to deny a permit to Minnesota Valley Humane Spciet Y THE LONE OAK TREE. . .THE SYMBOL OF STRENGTH AND GROWTH IN OUR COMMUNITY Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer • FIRST NAME ;LAST NAME ;ADDRESS ;CITY :S>:ZIP ;DONATION TYPE + + + -+--+ + hark. P. :Slotviy :1827 Trailway Drive ;Eagan :M>:55122 :membership 1 Laura V. :Poduch ;4152 South Meadowlark Way ;Eagan :MN:55122 ;Membership Phyllis__ ,-ig�ar; ;4374 Garden Trail :Eagan :M>:55123 ;membership Holly and Kevin :Hill ;1277 Birch Point Apt 5 ;Eagan :M>;55123 ;Membership Debra L. & Tony :wand :4737 West Wind Trail ;Eagan :MN:55123 ;Membership Mary Lou ;Martin :F.O.Box 364 ;Eagan :M>:55121 :Membership Jim B. or Carol ;Brown ;4863 Windsor Court ;Eagan :M>;55122 ;membership Judy M. :Jahn2 :1614 Clemson Drive ;Eagan ;M>;55122 ;Membership Mary Jean ;Fuller :3551 Blue Jay Way 1200 ' 55 23 ' Jay Y :Eagan ,Mh,..l�.� ,Membership Debra L. ;Miila ;1045 Kettle Creek Road ;Eagan ;M>;55123 ;membership Shirley ;Baker ;2268 Clark Street :Eagan :MN:55122 :Membership Rebecca M. ;Smith ;4280 Sequoia Drive ;Eagan :MN:55122 ;membership Joan J. :Jeska ;3080 Sheilds Drive 4107 ;Eagan ;M>155121 ;Membership John E. ;Sigfrid '1729 Hickory Hill ;Eagan 'MN'55 122 :Membership R Kimberly A. :Bankert :4256 Daniel Drive ;Eagan ;MN:55123 ;Membership . Eileen and Mike ;Sre_smarr ;3820 Alder Lane :Eagan :MN:55122 :Membership Marcia ,Carlson ,753 Hackamere Dr. . ,Eagan , 55123 M,,..� � ,membership Robert L.or Lisa :BaE5 ;4342 Foxridge Ct. ;Eagan ;M>;55122 ;Membership Robin L. ;Fa nac :3555 Dodd Road ;Eagan :MN:55123 ;Membership Carrie ;Mailiet ;3842 Ballan ram Road #7 ;5 12 t ,Eagan ,MN,:,5.�2 ,Membership Paul Wen;. & 'Mary Newell '3497 Coachman Rd. :M '55 2 . } ,Eagan ,..N, 12� :membership Michael T. & Jane E.:Helbrant :3859 Palisade Point :Eagan :MN;55122 ;membership Ti m and kelieen ;Gut.mann ;1304 Koistad Lane :Eagan ;MN;55123 ;membership ann> Michael and Cnriste.:;Jolowsky ;4402 Livingston Drive ;Eagan ;Mi;55123 ;membership gen> i 0 Michael and LhiriSti);JO:C�wc.ki ,44i2 Livingston Drive 'Eagan 'M%,55123 :membership gent W . Brian & Kimberly:Herzfeld ;3202 Jurdy Court South ;Eagan ;M>;55121 ;membership gen> Ann L. :Phillips ;3050 Pine Ridge Drive ;Eagan :MN:55121 ;Membership Ben> Patricia ;Coo. ;1201 Spoonbill Circle ;Eagan ;MN;55. 2 Swe> ;Membership s«_> Sandra ;Gotz ;1554 Clemson Drive :Eagan :M>;55122 :Membership Swe>. Terry & Luann :Nygaard :1775 Turquoise Tr. :Eagan :MN:55122 ;Membership T,M> Kay ikollin ;1323 Crestridge Lane :Eagan ;M>'55123 ;Membership/E Pamela ;mast ;4662 Parkridge Court ;Eagan ;M>;55123 ;Membership/Env> Rob ;Brown :3470 Coachman Road ;Eagan ;M>;55121 ;Membership/Env> Tracie D.and J. 1130 Eric:Hathawa}y i ,�, 4 Deercl ff Lane ,Eagan ;M>:55123 ,Membe.ship/Env> J. Marlynn :Greenwood :3660 Denmark Avenue ;Eagan :MN:55123 :Membership/Env> Gail A. :Kieper :2066 Carnelian Lane ;Eagan :M>;55122 ;Membership/Env> Margaret Sarazin an>:Murphy ;1266 Wilderness Curve :Eagan :M>;55123 ;Membership/Env> Dr. Jeffrey A. & Pa>;Rud ;910 Lakewood Hills Road ;Eagan :MN:55123 ;Membership, an Linda :Duasmen :1543 B Clemson Drive :Eagan :MN:55122 :membership, An> Timothy :Dula:- :1782 Turquoise Trail :Eagan :M>:55122 ;Membership, An> Kathleen ;Loher :4235 Beaver Des Road ;Eagan :M>:55122 :Membership, Bo> Kathy :McLean ;1276 Ironwood Lane *3 ;Eagan :M>:55123 ;membership, bo> Kathleen ;Gilbertson :1251 Berry Ridge Road :Eagan :MN:55123 ;membership, bo> William and Ili :Rorke ;4785 Galaxie Avenue :Eagan :M>:55122 ;membership, bo> Kathleen M. :Sprark :3636 Heather Dr. ;Eagan :MN;55122 :membership, Do> Mark S. ;Garber :1662 Hickory Lane :Eagan :MN:55122 ;membership, ge> Kathy :Nester :1055 Wedgewood Lane S. :Eagan :MN:55123 ;membership, ge> Pamela J. :Kadidlo :4339 Diamond Drive ;Eagan :M>:55122 :Mesbership,Yuc> rt. MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE `; EAGAN,GIT�'•.OQi,JNGIL :;Eagaiti`Mhi t o : j ily i i99i A regular meeting of the Eagan City'Council was held c Tuesday,July 2,1991,at the Eagan Municipal Center. Present were Mayor Egan and Coiiiit*embers.N4liter, Gustafson, McCrea, and Pawlenty. Also present were City Administrator Hedges, Community:Pevoloptiment Director Dale Runkle, Director of Public Works Tom Colbert, and City Attorney Mike Dougherty. EADINDitil City Administrator Hedges recommended:tl tiiie item< ie:added to Department Head Business. He said that Police Officer Mike Schrader had a state** he wa**41 to make personally to the City Council regarding the action the City took in his and Officer Bill White's behalf while they served in Operation Desert Storm. Wachter moved, Gustafson seconded;:a: iioiion to.'uppxove the agenda for the July 2, 1991 regular City Council meeting as amended. Aye: 5 Nay: 0 i .r McCrea moved,Wachter seconde 4tnotion to approve the minutes of the May 15, 1991 Special City Council meeting as presented. Aye: 5 •... • Councilmember Pawlenty recommendediabe followi..ehaages to the minutes of the June 18, 1991 regular City Council meeting: • • Page 6, last paragraph, second sedtence;r:replace "assessment-backed expectations" with "investment- backed expectations." Page 6, last paragraph, second sentence, replace "higher and better"with"more intense." Page 6, last paragraph, third sentence,..add.the..following..phrase: "so the City Council would not be forced to grant a higher use based on the assieit . Gustafson moved,Wachter seconded a motion:t,:npprove.the minutes of the June 18,1991 regular City Council meeting as amended. Aye: 5 Nay 0 •.ARTMENT D B ::...ESS STATEMENT/MIKE SCHRADER After introduction by Chief of Police Pat Geagan,Police Officer Mike Schrader thanked the City Council for the support he and Officer Bill White received while they weri:*iationed overseas during Operation Desert Storm. Officer Schrader said that many other reservists were oiiiiicerned about coming home to a job and received little assistance from their employer.s...4*§*113.e::*:Iiistw.ife were extremely grateful and added that it was a pleasure to work for the City of Eagafii;::In tii*:May it a a and the City Council expressed the City's thanks to Officer Schrader. 441 Page 2/EAGAN CITY COUNCIL MINUTES July 2, 1991 FINANCE DEPAlt*ENTTANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT ••••••• Mayor Egan introduced this item:* the 1990 Comprehensive Annual Financial Report. City Administrator Hedges said that the comprA*iye annual financial report was prepared by the Department of Finance each year and then audited by the fii2:0:0ap.40:*Touche. After reviewing the composition of the report,Director of Finance VanOverbeke introduced Jeff Radunz and Megan Tully from Deloitte Touche. Mr.Radunz then reviewed the report with his firm's observations and recommendations. The Director of Finance was recognized for having received an excellence in financial reporting award for the seventh year in a :::.............. McCrea moved, Gustafson seconded,*a motion to adopt the 1990 Comprehensive Annual Financial Report. Aye: 5 Nay: 0 ...•.•. CONSEAGENU •:•:•:.: •.•... •••::•:. ::•:•::•:•. ••::.. ••:•::::::::::• A. Personnel Items Item 1. Seasonal Recreational Worker/Information Item--It was recommended that the hiring of Benita Sollar as a Seasonal Recreation Worker be ratified. Item 2. Resignation/Head Building:Maintenance Worker--It was recommended that the resignation of Terry Gilsrud, Head Building Maintenance.700. 0;:be.accepted and hiring procedures authorized to fill the ••• vacancy. • ..• B. Curbside Recycling Containers AppOye SpecificatiOki/Authorize Advertisement for Bids It was recommended that the specific:atiii0$8:aPProved and the advertisement for bids authorized for curbside recycling containers. ri:::::::::••••••• C. University of Minnesota/Relocation of Geese from City Parks It was recommended that a request by the University of Minnesota Department of Fisheries and Wildlife to relocate geese from O'Leary, Kettle and.:ce4arP944::PAr4*-the City of Eagan be approved. D. License Renewals/Service Stations ....• .•..•.• It was recommended that the service station permits be approved for renewal as presented. .•... E. License Renewals/Amusement Devices .•.•.•.• It was recommended that the amusement device renewals be approved as presented. F. License Renewals/Gambling.Burnsville Optimist ....• It was recommended that the gambling license renewal for the Burnsville Optimist Club as presented. G. Licenses. Plumbers -.•:-:•:•:•:•:•:.:.•••.-.-:•:•:•:•:•:••••••••:.:.:-:•:--. It was recommended that the plumbers licenses be appri.041 as presented. Page 3/EAGAN CITY COUNCIL MINU 'lrS::.:.;:.:: :::::.:.:::::.::::::::`•:::.:. July 2, 1991 H. Change of Meeting Date/Septetimber 19. 1991. Citv'Council Meeting It was recommended that a change iiit.:*.c.eting date b Approved for the second meeting of September from September 19, 1991, to September 16, • I. Resolution. Designation Cedar Ridge Christian Church as a Polling Place in Precinct 14 It was recommended that a resolution designating Cedar Ridge Christian Church as the polling place in Precinct 14 be approved. J. Contract 91-05. Receive Bids/Award Contract (Willbiok Addition) It was recommended that the bids for Contract 91-05,(:4Vtllbrook Addition - Streets & Utilities) be received and consideration of contract award contini :until firif.plat approval or August 6, 1991,whichever occurs first. • K. Contract 91-07. Receive Bids/Award Contract (1991 Sealcoating) It was recommended that the bids for Contract 91-07 (1991 Sealcoating) be received and the contract awarded to the lowest responsible bidder. L. Project 609.. Receive Feasibility'.Rpport:/Or4rr Public Hearing (Cliff Road Upgrade) It was recommended that the feasibility report for Project.609 (Cliff Road Upgrade) be approved and a public hearing scheduled to be held on August M. Project 616.617.&618.Authorize Ire sitiiiity Reports(Cedar Grove 3rd.4th.5th,and 6th Additions - Capital Improvement Program Reconstru ion' It was recommended that the preparation of feasibility reports for Projects 616, 617, and 618 (Cedar Grove 3rd, 4th, 5th, and 6th Additions - CIP Reconstruction) be authorized. N. Approve 1992 Budget/Cost Pattipofion:€ai thc::$l0J 4og Watershed Management Organization It was recommended that the 1992 Budget and::related cost:participation by the City of Eagan for the Blackdog Lake WMO be approved. O. Final Plat. Whispering Woods Sixth Addition It was recommended that the final plat for Whispering Woods Sixth Addition be approved. Wachter moved, Gustafson seconded,a motion to approve the Consent Agenda as presented. Aye: 5 Nay: 0 PROJECT 543R0j ; S O*0 HEARING SKYLINE ROAD/SIBLEY:HHIS:tiRiit:',..*:STREETS & UTILITIES Mayor Egan introduced this project as 543R,final assess 'hearing,Skyline Road/Sibley Hills Drive- streets and utilities. After brief opening remarks from City Administrator Hedges and Director of Public Works Colbert, Mayor Egan opened the hearing to public comment. 4 Page 4/EAGAN CITY COUNCIL July 2, 1991 Mr.Gary Fuchs,on behalf of Fredei ick and Maxine Delosh:,:confirmed that written objection had been received from his client. Mary Lou O'Hearn,2888 Sibley Hills'T3 vc;sa 4.t.h�: ley Hills Drive upgrade was only necessary to develop Prettyman Heights. She said assessment§•ii�i:# tty�iaii•Heights were low but those against her property were in excess of$22,000. She said the assessments were unfair and asked if it was necessary to go to court to mitigate these costs. Director of Public Works Colbert said that some of the assessments in Prettyman Heights had been prepaid as a condition of final plat thereby giving the appearance of lowering those assessments. Mayor Egan asked City Attorney MIke:Dcu ttywl ether there was any informal process available to homeowners who disagreed with the amoune4iiiiiiiS4Siiiiiiii.x0t.y Attorney Dougherty said that in order to preserve the homeowners'rights they would have to pursue the foiiital process. He said while they pursued this formal process, however, they could continue to work.with the City.in an attempt to find a resolution. Elaine Greer of 1428 Skyline Drive::said::h0.p 4ntty'and a number of others were being assessed because they had access to Highway 13. She'askked why Other:properties that also had access to Highway 13, were not being assessed. Director of Public Works Colbert said a number of other properties were originally included in the project but,after the first public hearing,several objections were submitted and staff was directed to research the City's position in regard to these objections. He said it was determined that because these properties could take direct access from Lone Oak Road and had no intention of utilizing the improvement,the City would not be able to sustain their assessments. Therefore,in June of 1989 a new public hearing was held and the assessment roll modified. Ms. Greei::than::asked why the property owners on Skyline Road from Pilot Knob Road to where the improvement begaii'wer ::niit::assessed. Mr. Colbert said those homeowners had previously paid for street improvements in front..oJ' theiiiI:bon es:and, therefore, were not assessed with this project. Mr.Randy Buffie of 1652 Rustic Hills HilisPrOeiaidili6 assessment area should be expanded. In addition, when the assessments were levied against the;001:ierties,the negative impacts were not taken into consideration. Mr. Buffie said developers such as Mr. Prettyman are the biggest benefactors for these improvements because they can pass the costs of the improvements along to the purchasers of their homes. Consequently,those who profit by the improvements should bear a larger percentage of the costs. He said his objections revolved around the following issues: 1) the assessable area should be larger, 2) a larger portion of the assessments should be paid from the general fund,and 3)the developer.should..pay..a•larger.share. He asked that the project be tabled for further review. Mr.Marvin Post of 2858 Sibley Hills Drive obiected to his:alssessment and objected to the method used to assess his property. The road alignment should have::been different but Mr. Post said Mr. Prettyman had refused to allow the road to go through one of the lots:: Prettyaa:Heights because he claimed it had been sold. He wished to note that the lot was still vacant. •• Mr.Bill Davidek of 1436 Skyline Road said it was his understanding that the developer would help pay the individual homeowners'portions of Skyline Road. (Neither members of the City Council nor staff indicated an awareness of such an agreement). Mr. Davidek said he did not,.disagree there was some advantage to the road improvements, however, he did not believe his home valiie::increased $18,000. City Attorney Mike Dougherty said that during the process,staff had met with an appraiser to estimate and substantiate the financial aspects of the improvements. He said in genera'it:i*8 deter i :that the project and its assessments were snctainable. Mr.Davidek asked about a senior's:f it t: rid t3iei>:i why it was not possible to pay half of his assessment immediately with the City carrying the remainder at a lower interest rate. Mr. Dougherty said the homeowner could pay the assessments within thirty days withoit::tncurring any interest costs but said the deferment policy, including the senior citizen's deferment is directistrby the Minnesota Legislature. In answer to a question from Councilmember Pawlenty, Mr. Dougherty said the City Council is generally restricted to r Page 5/EAGAN CITY COUNCIL MINUTES July 2, 1991 whatever the legislature allows as to deferiziepts; however, thereiicoiuld be some Council discretion in carrying • charges. Gary Fuchs pointed out that if ontwanted to fashion a unique payment plan,it could become part of the negotiations g ns between the homeowner a4:the City hCouncit iiiiTse settlement of any lawsuit. Councilmember Wachter suggested that: tprojial.i�if'*assessment roll be postponed to allow additional discussion and explanation. Mayor Egan said the''issue could be continued, however, would only delay the inevitable. Director of Public Works Colbert said staff could explain the assessments but could not provide hope that the assessments would be reduced. In addition,he believed the homeowners understood the methodology, however, disagreed with the amount of the assessments. Mr. Buffie said a mediator should be appointed to negotiate the assessments. City Attorney.Dougherty:.sai4..that..,once the appeal was in process, settlement negotiations could occur. Councilmember McCrea:pointed.our t t iif the assessments were reduced,the money would have to be found elsewhere. Councilmember Gustafson asked City Attot iey Doughei?ty whether the City had an appraisal that indicated that each property increased by a certain.numb er of.dola s. Mr.Dougherty said that generally projects are looked at as a whole, not as individual ogerries. Frances Wood of 1426 Skyline Road said the neighbors were happy with Skyline Drive as it was and have received no benefit with its completion to Highway 13. Ms.Wood said the developer should have picked up the tab and thought the neighborhood generous to pay the improvements in front of their properties. Mayor Egan noted that this is a unii ue:project;however,pointed out that the City has already absorbed approximately 25% of the project costs becauise::ol:parkland. While the City has attempted to deal with the project and the resultant assessments in as fair a'ma�iger;as:: ssible, there was general agreement that the process must move forward. Councilmember McCrea asked.that•.-staff and legal counsel study the issue of interest deferment or a senior citizen deferment plan for.rt a payment of assessments. • McCrea moved,Pawlenty seconded,a ifletion.to close the public hearing, approve the final assessment roll for Project 543R (Skyline Road/Sibley Drive - Streets & Utilities) and authorized its certification to Dakota County. Aye: 5 Nay: 0 PROJECT 524/FINAL ASSESSMENT HEARING JOHNNY CARE RIDGE ROAD After brief introductions by Mayor Egan a$a city Ailniiniatator Hedges,Director of Public Works Tom Colbert provided background on Project 524. He said at:the May7..final assessment hearing,several issues were raised by the developer regarding the method and the amount of their assessments and,consequently,the hearing was continued for further study. Mr. Colbert said that zesear '' Y ch,:anc�luding a preliminary appraisal and review by the City Attorney's office,indicated,however,that 100%of the costs of the project were eligible for financing through special assessments and the assessment roll had been revised accordingly. Mayor Egan then opened the hearing to public comment. Mr.Tom Wilmus,of E.H.Wilmus Properties, Inc.,said his company objected to the amount of the assessment,with their major objection in regard to the size of the roadway. He said it was over and above that which was nee4e4 to serve the property and said a 32'road should have been installed and assessed as such. He asked:::W:.the appraiser had addressed the issue. Councilmember Gustafson asked City Attorney.Dotecty.if.the.:appraiser had made an evaluation of the property and assessments based on a 32 of:: oadway:ar;:a: g.Y. roadway. City Attorney Dougherty was unaware of the specifics of the appraisal,however;'stated'tlxat'the appraiser had indicated the overall property had benefitted by the amount of the assessment. I J Page 6/EAGAN CITY COUNCIL MINUTES........•.•.•:.•.•.•.•.•.•:.•::•::::•. July 2, 1991 • Mr.Richard Marhula,also of E.H;W iilmus Properties,Ini• said that the original feasibility report called for a 44' road yet at some point the road.width was increased;.to.56' and then to 108'. He asked if another feasibility report had been prepared and if so,why they hadn't..00.0 notified of such changes.,While stating that•such discussion went beyond the scope of this•*Bt.ssgieat, ing,Mayor Egan asked Director of Public Works Colbert for a brief response. Mr.Colbert said t itt:it:was:explained to the property owner that the scope of the project was expanded in response to their requests. He said Wilmus Properties even dedicated the additional right of way necessary for a wider street section because of intersections they wanted accommodated requiring medians and turn lanes. Mr.Colbert said Wilmus properties was involved in detailed design plans,the increased scope of the project and the additional right of way acquisition. Mr.Wilmus then said they understood a traffic and engineering study had been done by Short.Elliott?-I:endra ksoa:indicating traffic of 8,000 cars per day. He said they were told they had a choice of two turn:antis or a:cent'er median or the project would be scrapped. Mayor Egan said it was obvious this would be an area.of.contention and then dosed the hearing to public comment. There being no further discussion,W,aeliter movet3;:Nib.'seconded,a motion to close the public hearing and approve the final assessment roll for Project 524(Johnny Cake Ridge Road) and authorized its certification to Dakota County. Aye: 5 Nay. 0 EAGANDALE CENTER INDUSTRIAL PARK 3RD AND.4TH ADDITIONS/OVERLAY After introduction by Mayor Egan,City'Aitinit i'trator Hedges said that at the June 18,1991 regular City Council meeting, representatives of Opus Corpor:ation°iiii&i;ated they had not received copies of the feasibility report. At that time, they asked that the public hearing be coatim ed in order to analyze all appropriate data The City Council subsequently continued the public•hearin_to:the•July 2, 1991 City Council meeting. Mr. Mark Anderson, a real estate`dveloper for Opus Corporation, said the information had been reviewed and they agreed the improvements were necessary; however, he questioned the timing of the project and asked for a one year delay. In addition, once the project is approved, he asked that the assessments be spread over a 15 year period. In answer to a question from Councilmember McCrea,City Attorney Dougherty said it would be up to the City Council's discretion as to whether to spread the assessments over a 15 year period. Mr. Anderson then discussed the.•driveway;akernate.,.portion of the project. He said Opus would appreciate some flexibility in the design Mayor Egan then asked Director of Public *Oils Colbert whether a one year deferment would be appropriate. Mr.Colbert said this is not a crisis situation but Stift had proposed the improvements in order to maintain the City's infrastructure and extend the life expectancy of:thi_ese streets. He said this is the worst of the industrial parks but a year's delay would not create any significant:problems. Mr. Colbert noted that if the project were approved and the improvements installed,the first assessment payment would not be due until 1993. The City Council then disciisced the driveway access issue. Director of Public Works Colbert said upgrading the driveways was recommended as a part of this project due in part to aesthetics and because unfinished driveways do allow a certain amount of dirt and sand te*ish into the Cites streets and storm sewers. Additionally,because of the large number of driveways,costs wouldiie favorable. Mr.Colbert said the driveways do not affect the roadway but staff was straitly.:ze (01?ffie4 :{ eir upgrade as an alternate. After discussing whether the project could be approved bitt,its contract dates delayed,McCrea moved, Wachter seconded, a motion to close the public hearing and appto ie Project 608 (Eagandale Center Industrial Park 3rd and 4th Additions- Overlay) with a February or Marcli:bid request. Aye: 5 Nay: 0 Page 7/EAGAN CITY COUNCIL MINUTES July 2, 1991 McCrea moved, Wachter secondWa'''motion to apprt ve the driveway alternate to Project 608 (Eagandale Center Industrial Park 3rd and 46 Additions-Overlay)iwith the driveway alternate to be approved at a standard acceptable to the City. Mr.Dennis McCabe,owner of North Slat T ikgg is omp any in the Eagandale Center Industrial Park, wished to contest the closure of two driveways locetei:tiiif:ltis Property. Additionally,he did not wish to spend $7,000 to upgrade driveways that he used approximately two or three times a year. Director of Public Works Colbert said there was no intent to remove the driveways on Mr.McCabe's property,however,staff was unaware the driveways were still in use. Mr. McCabe then addressed the changes in the road alignment at the corner of Apollo Road and Mike Collins Drive. He said the changes recommended for that intersection would make• it even more difficult and unsafe then it present7y::ia::_1 tt;::I c abe said he would prefer the intersection configuration left as it is but with stop signs'or'slow'sign s`instatl :;: Mr. Colbert suggested that stop signs be installed at the intersection of Apollo Road and Mike:Collins DriY nn a temporary basis to see if it alleviated some of the safety concerns for that intersection. Aye: 5 Nay 0 • LEXINGTON/LONE OAK ROAD INTERSECTION RECONSTRUCTION AND SIGNALIZATION After brief introductions by Mayor:.Egan and City Administrator Hedges,Mark Hanson of Bonestroo, Rosene, Anderlik and Associates described:Pioject:601. Mr. Hanson said the improvement was proposed by Dakota County with the costs to be shared by 6i:0 ::4d:.County. The proposed assessments will be levied against all abutting property and because there are,three'different levels of improvements, there will be three different rates of assessment. The total cost of:*the project•.is:.approximately $1,077,000 with approximately $631,000 being the County's share and $445,000 t}e..Cat'1/� :share:'The proposed assessments are estimated at $240,000. Bob Worthington of Opus Corporation said they have not had sufficient time to prepare for the public hearing. He said information was only recently received,not allowing an opportunity to review all aspects of the project. Director of Public Works Colbert said a number of pieces of correspondence had gone to Opus regarding the project in addition to his having met with them personally. It was suggested that perhaps the public hearing should be continued and that:repFes•atatiyes•of.Opus Corporation should meet with staff in an effort to iron out some of the issues before:itie::iaext:pubhe.b armg'date.• There were a number of residents in the audience to ade4ess Project 601 and they were afforded the opportunity to share any concerns at this time, howevei';:no one elected to do so. Wachter moved, McCrea seconded a motion to contintie`to the July 16, 1991 regular City Council meeting the public hearing for Project 601 (Lexington/Lone Oak Road - Intersection Reconstruction and Signalization). A neighborhood meeting with representatives of Dakota.:County and Mark Hanson from Bonestroo, Rosene,Anderlik and Associates will be held at 6:30 p.m. on Tliuirslay,July 11 at City Hall. Aye: 5 Nay: 0 Page 8/EAGAN CITY COUNCIL MINUTES July 2, 1991 •...............•••.•... WILDERNESS RUN ROAD/RECONSTRUCTION .:•:•:: Mayor Egan introduced this item 41'.roject 603,Wilcirt#Oss Run Road - Reconstruction. •..... .•:•:•:•:::: Pawlenty moved, McCrea secondecl,.*: ::40:-:** the public hearing and approve Project 603 (Wilderness Run Road - Reconstruction). Aye:•••5istaY::::ir VACATION/WHISPERING WOODS 6TH ADDITION Mayor Egan introduced this item as a.y..4c.atic41.pf.the drainage and utility easements for Whispering Woods 6th Addition. ':•:•:•:: ••••::::: McCrea moved, Pawlenty seconded, a motiOn'to close the public hearing and approve the vacation of various street, drainage and utility easements as descijbed in the:peOtion subject to the approval and recording of the proposed Whispering Woods 6th Addition final plat Aye. 5 Nay 0 CIGARETTE LICENSE EXTENSION McCrea moved, Egan seconded, a motion to approve an extension of existing cigarette licenses from June 30, 1991 to December 31, 1991. Ayei::::5.::N4y: 0 . . •.•.. In order to avoid inequitable treatment;MiCk• O')OOlvecl,.Gustafson seconded,a motion to approve the new cigarette license applications for MGM Liquor Warehouse,Kenny's Liquor,and Great Northern Spirits with the proviso that before the license period expires,the City c,:o*...4:•May decide to discontinue vending machine sales in the City and move all other tobacco sale.S;to..*:1;040:ifie.Counter. Aye: 5 Nay 0 TASK FORCE ON TOBACCO ACCESSIBILITY TO MINORS Mayor Egan introduced this item as appointments to a Blue Ribbon Task Force on Tobacco Accessibility to Minors. Because Derrick Robillard,one of two youth representatives was in attendance,he was introduced to the Council and audience. :•:•:•:-:•••••:.•: :•:::.: Pawlenty moved,Wachter seconded;:ii:inOtiOiiiii:ipprekie:ihe appointments to the Eagan Blue Ribbon Task Force on Tobacco Accessibility to Minors (see Exhibit A).::Aye: 5 Nay 0 :•:•:•:. •::::::: .•.•.•.• - YMCA PROPERTY REQUEST At the YMCA's request, Pawlenty moved, McCrea seconded, a motion to continue indefinitely the matter of the Eagan area YMCA request for property donation. Aye: 5 Nay 0 NPY::BPRNPA VARIANCE/BOULEVARD TREES/OAKO:OF BRIDGEWATER Mayor Egan introduced this item aSiiAti#4:i.-.S. 001soration,to place boulevard trees within ten feet of city streets within the Oaks of Bridge4iiiiii:AdilliiiiItkateerilong the south side of Wescott Road in the NE quarter of Section 23. :•:•:•:•:. :::•:•:•: Page 9/EAGAN CITY COUNCIL MINUTES July 2, 1991 Gustafson moved,Pawlenty secon4d,, a motion to appro a variance of up to three feet from the 10' setback for Sienna Corporation to place trees the boulevard ln city streets within the Oaks of Bridgewater Addition and subject to the following conditions: L All applicable City Codes. • ••••:.:•:.:.:•••::••••••::•:::•••••• 2. Within 30 days of installation,the applieiikVAII provide the City an as-built of the exact location of the trees. Aye: 5 Nay: 0 PRELIMINARY PLAT/OA CLIF'i.....6tH ADDITION CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT/AUTO SERVICE STATION •.•.... Mayor Egan introduced this item as.:a,:pre.... the Oak Cliff 6th Addition/Federal Land Company, consisting of six lots on approi6Mafily.1.9 140::(liii•gliborhood business) zoned acres within the Winkler-Jackson Planned Development and a conditional use permit to allow an automotive service station in an NB district located along the southwest intersection of Cliff Road and Slater Road in the NW quarter of Section 31. Pawlenty moved,McCrea seconded,.a motion to continue the applications indefinitely with direction that submittals be returned to the Advisory Plar*g:Ccnmission for review if they are determined by staff to be substantially different than those previously..0iiiie0.4*.OeCommission. Aye: 5 Nay 0 • ••• •:•:•: CONDITO.NAL:vsglotmrr VETERINARY CON'irq.DUCKWOOD SQUARE • • Mayor Egan introduced this item:as a conditional use permit for Sheila Megan, DVM, to allow a veterinary clinic in a CSC (Community Shopping Center) zoned district located on Lot 1, Block 1, Duckwood Square Addition, south of Duckwood Drive, east of Pilot Knob Road in the NW quarter of Section 15. City Administrator Hedges said that this item had been considered by the Advisory Planning Commission at their June 25 regular meeting and they had reconiTer140a179Y.0......... Gustafson moved,McCrea s nda ionóprove the conditional use permit for Sheila Megan to allow a veterinary clinic in a CSC zoned district ii(Duchvoc4:.:.Square Shopping Center as presented and subject to the following conditions: .•.•.•.• •-.-.-.• ...•.•.• •.-.•.- •...•.• 1. No boarding of animals other than those requiring Medical treatment. 2. All other applicable City Codes and requirements. 3. No animal shall be allowed or exercised Aye: 5 Nay 0 :•••:::::: a Page 10/EAGAN CITY COUNCIL MINUTES July 2, 1991 APPROVE PLANS/AUTHORIZE ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS EAGANDALE CENTER IN3) JSTRIAL PARB::3RD AND 4TH ADDITIONS McCrea moved,Pawlenty seconded a t cA3ktruue indefinitely Contract 91-06(Eagandale Center Industrial Park 3rd and 4th Additions - Overlay). Aye: 5 Nay: 0 COUNTY COST PARTICIPATION AGREEMENT AND TRAFFIC SIGNAL AGREEMENT Mayor Egan introduced this item as'-Proj &ect.: 1;'County Cost Participation Agreement #26-16 and Traffic Signal Agreement #91-07 (Lexington and::: ;one Oak;:.Road - Intersection Reconstruction and Signalization). McCrea moved, Pawlenty second d, ty e�i;::A:fi�otion: ::coatitiite to the July 16, 1991 regular City Council meeting County Cost Participation Agreemnt::#26-16 aril:T afl'ic Signal Agreement #91-07. Aye: 5 Nay:0 APPROVE PLANS/AUTHORIZE ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS WILDERNESS RUN ROAD RECONSTRUCTION Mayor Egan introduced this item as.Contract 91-08, approve plans/authorize advertisement for bids (Wilderness Run Road Reconstruction). • Gustafson moved,Wachter seconded,a motion to appi ive the plans for Contract 91-08(Wilderness Run Road Reconstruction) and authorize the advertisement for a bid biclsoliening to be held at 11:00 a.m.on August 2, 1991. Aye: 5 Nay 0 • REVIEW 3MPACT OF ISD #196 STUDENT PARKING FEE PROPOSAL After introduction by Mayor Egan, Director of Public Works Colbert said the City had been notified by School District #196 that a student parking lot fee would be implemented at the Eagan High School. With this policy,there are concerns that students.will.not..pay.:the.fee.and park on local streets. School District #196 is asking that"No Parking"signs be ills' tiai:t e;area:;iodlcai(441. o parking between the hours of 7:00 a.m.- 3:00 p.m., September through May. Mr. Colbeit said.stab is looknig for direction from the City Council as installation of these signs would approach$5300. He asked whetliisf the Council would prefer that staff forego the signs this year and budget for next year or install:: m and:itequest that #196 pay for their installation. School District#196 has already indicated that they haie:fever subsidized the installation of these types of signs. It was the general consensus of the City Council that a problem not be assumed until it occurs and directed staff to request that ISD#196 notify students that if they are going to drive to school,they should park in the school parking lot and not on City streets. No action will be taken to install signs unless 35% of the relative neighborhood area petitions for such measures. If a petition is received and it becomes necessary to install no parking signs on City streets,ISD #196 will be asked to tci.:.4.prow the necessary funds to reimburse the City for costs associated with the installation of the signs. A letter:wi l be.sent to Independent School District #196 with this information. No other Page 11/EAGAN CITY COUNCIL MINUTES July 2, 1991 HRA ACT14N/SENIOR CITIZ, N:HOUSING City Administrator Hedges said that BRA ati*E40.440e0ifictor Mark Ulfers had requested that the City Council consider an architectural change to the senior:¢it nsliousing project. They are proposing that a stucco surface be installed as opposed to brick with stucco or aluminum accents. Discussion centered on whether or not the stucco surface would be of the quality and durability of brick. Victor Zeuthen of Arvid Elness Architects said that when they originally presented their plans for this project,they had recommended either stucco or brick. He said stucco would meet all requirements and.architecturally,would be more residential looking as well as giving more formality to its commercial area: ictti4:::..Hd:::costs are very comparable; however, some types of brick would be much more expensive. •• • :: o sa• After additional discussion, Gustafson moved;:Egan seconded, a motion to approve an architectural change for stucco as the exterior for the new senior::hoising project: Aye: 3 Nay 2 (McCrea and Wachter) HRA ACTION/i99•IBLOCK•• RANT APPLICATION A number of concerns were expressed regarding the shift of approximately $10,000 from the senior housing project to assist in financing redevelopment strategies for the greater Cedarvale area. Director of Community Development Runkle said he believed these funds would give the City the most flexibility and would provide a potential revenue source to study:*be.cedarvale area. He said any funds not used for the Cedarvale study could be shifted back at the end of tlie:y!eattc4:0e senior housing project. Gustafson moved, Egan seconded, a motion to'approve the designation of up to $10,000 in the application designation for Community Development Block.Grant Funds from senior housing to redevelopment strategies for the greater Cedarvale area Aye: :: ::(McCrea and Pawlenty) VACATE DRA)N:Adi AND UTILITY EASEMENTS SUNRISE HILLS 2ND ADDITION Mayor Egan introduced this item as a request to vacate drainage and utility easements, receive the petition and order public hearing (Lot 4, Block 1, Sunrise Hills 2nd Addition). Wachter moved,McCrea seconded: ifl titii4in:to:icceive:the:petition to vacate a portion of drainage and utility easements for Lot 4,Block 1,Sunrise Hills 2nd Edition and schedule a public hearing to be held August 6, 1991. Aye: 5 Nay 0 VACATE DRAINAGE Ali :UTILITttASEMENTS EAGANDALE CENTER INDUSTRIAL PARK 8TH ADDITION Mayor Egan introduced this item as a request to vacate drainage and utility easements, receive the petition and order a public hearing(Lots 1 and 2, Block 1,Eagandale Center Industrial Park 8th Addition). McCrea moved,Wachter seconded,a motion to receive thee.petition to vacate a portion of drainage and utility easements for Lots 1 and 2,Block 1,Eagandale Center Industrial Park 8th Addition,and schedule a public hearing to be held August 6, 1991. Aye: Page 12/EAGAN CITY COUNCIL MINUTES July 2 1991 VACATE DRAM!.. GE.ANfi tUTILTI'Y.EASEMENTS OVERVIEW ESTATE REPU T .�. a and utility easements, receive the Mayor Egan introduced this item as�a::guest to w t�R pit), 8,9 and::W;;:Ove a:.:: petition, and order a public hearing(Lots of drainage and McCrea moved,Wachter seconded,a motion to receive the petition to vacate a portion ng to be held August utility easements for Lots 8,9 and 10,Overview Estate Replat and schedule a public 6, 1991. Aye: 5 Nay. 0 ............................ ............................ ............................. BLOCK P ARTY/A TYI,I TISTRATIVE POLICY rove.the administrative policy for allowing street Wachter moved,Gustafson seconded,a motioit;to aPP 18mieiitation by City staff. Aye: 5 Nay: 0 closures for block parties and authorized its adminiafratt'e unp• .•.. t CHANGING CONDITIONS/SKY VIEW ADDITION aief►t.Runkle said that on May 7 the City Council approved the Sky Director of Community Develo p ��� of. let approval placed on the preliminary plat. He said View Addition and the typical standard condiU is of.p. pp p approved by the preliminary ary pll were found during the final plat review process, two of the add'sticnal conditions app Y by the engineering staff not to be needed. Thesi'de of�.DDdd Rflad,�and Condition Condition #5 in�tstentirety that development shall construct a ditch along the eaBt. .. reads: "The development is required to intercept:t te:site ii atiii..the east ditch oa Dodd d Road and d convey it easterly to newly designated pond LP 23.1 at:tie: ►thwest corner of Trunk Highway Runkle said all other conditions have or wil3:fie:adhered to. Wachter moved,Gustafson seconded, a motion changing conditions of plat approval placed on the Sky View Addition preliminary plat as outlined above. Aye: 5 Nay. 0 REPAIR WORK/NOR' `HY#EW PARK: :ELTER BUILDING Wachter moved,Egan seconded,a motion to iyvai d the rt pair work for Northview park shelter building in the amount of$8,883 to Beacon Builders. Aye: 5;:: ay. 0 REQUEST/CEDAR-DIFFLEY SITE City Administrator Hedges said that Mike Gould representing G & P Enterprises, was requesting Enterprises, was requesting est ny assistance from the Dakota County HRA regarding low and i .oderate income housing Mayor said development site. While the Council agreed that low and moderate:income housing is needed, Egan e housing. Councilmember Pawlenty said this property was rezoned on the representation that it would be ifpscal of innovative, high-quality mefl1 r Pawlenty that the City Council had struggled with this :: ::it'as The is swayed his vote in favor of the project. He said if ifiet:c�itziviit e :achieved,then staff should be instructed not to pursue this alternative any further. No formal action was taken. : Page 13/EAGAN CITY COUNCIL MINUTES July 2, 1991 MUNICWAL ELECTION - C:#04GES Consideration for changing the municipal election to even:years and the Mayoral term to four years will be discussed at an upcoming workshop sessiOn.:::: ..............•.•.•.•.•...•.•.• Wachter moved,Egan seconded, a motion to approve the check list dated July 2, 1991, in the amount $640,847.20. Aye: 5 Nay: 0 .•.•.•.•. The City Council adjourned the regular meeting.'at approninately 11:10 p.m. .•.•.... •:•:-.•:•:• KF CITY 4:iA6AN E.J. VanOverbeke City Clerk :-:•:•:- ••••••• ..•.•. :•:-:•:• ••••••• .....•.• EXHIBIT A JUNE 26, 1991 TO: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES::' FROM: ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT WITT RE: BLUE RIBBON TASK FORCE TO ADDRESS ACCESSIBILITY OF TOBACCO PRODUCTS TO MINORS At its June 4 meeting, the City Council directed the establishment of a blue ribbon task force to study the accessibility of tobacco to minors. The membership was to have representationfrom.s:even areas of community interest. Staff contacted potential representatives'''of seven groups and recommends the following people be appointed to the task force: Chamber of Commerce Grocers Association George Markgraf, Rainbow Foods, Eagan Community at Large '?::: ,ary Jane Swenson, 3630 Knoll Ridge Dr. Vending machine Coalition :•.•. Tom 'Bri'ant, Minneapolis Association for non-smokers Sheryl.''Casey, 4706 Beacon Hill Rd. Youth Derek Robilland, 1411 Walfrid St. Amy Smiler, 1284 Berry Ridge Rd. Law Enforcement Jerry Meszaros, Eagan Police Dept. City (Facilitator) The Council is concerned with health and ,.,safety of City residents which includes youth using tobacco product*. Lalvt enforcement is concerned with sales of tobacco products to minors.:::::::: Issues to be reviewed by the task force could include: * Should the City regulate the sale of tobacco? If so, to what degree? * What controls should the city exert? * Identify and create awareness ofl ealth issues? * Identify and create awareness''' of dollar costs (economic considerations) ? * Are vending machines''a'>pi`oia3'�1a ''':'.'..=' * Is shoplifting a problem? * Where do minors obtain cigaretteS..iand other tobacco products? Page 2 A suggested timeline for the task force..is....as follows: July Initial meeting '::e's •akslsti''e4enda August Meeting Sept. Meeting •• October Draft recommendations for .;COtincil Nov/Dec Council consider 0bde:.:.ax0ridament Once the task force is approved, I will contact the members, set a meeting date and we will be up and running. • •