Loading...
05/07/1991 - City Council Regular AGENDA • REGULAR MEETING . EAGAN CITY COUNCIL EAGAN, MINNESOTA MUNICIPAL CENTER BUILDING MAY 7, 1991 6:30 P.M. 1 I. 6:30 - ROLL CALL & PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE (BLUE) II. 6:35 - ADOPT AGENDA & APPROVAL OF MINUTES (BLUE) III. 6:45 - DEPARTMENT HEAD BUSINESS (BLUE) IV. 6:55 - CONSENT AGENDA (PINK) r . - A. PERSONNEL ITEMS .3 B. LICENSES, Plumbers cC. LICENSE, Tree Maintenance Contrator, Henning & Rhode Associates , ( D. EXTENSION, Provision of Facility for American Legion Post . E. DECLARATION of Surplus Property and Request to Donate Outdated Self Contained ( Breathing Apparatus (SCAB) to Kettle River and Kerrick Fire Departments F. AMENDMENT to Fee Schedule, Police Department for Public Fingerprinting . 17) G. ACCREDITATION, Eagan Police Department Formal Withdrawal from Program 1.b H. WAIVER OF PLAT, Mark Calvin, Duplex Lot Split to Allow Individual Ownership of Lot 5, Block 1, Oakwood Heights 2nd Addition $ 1(, I. APPROVE Final Draft, 1991 Comprehensive Sewer Policy Plan J,O J. PROJECT 613, Receive Feasibility Report/Order Public Hearing (Willbrook Addition) A.;0 K. PROJECT 584, Receive Final Assessment Roll/Order Public Hearing (Rahn Road) r' y1L. PROJECT 578, Receive Final Assessment Roll/Order Public Hearing (Sibley Terminal Industrial Park - Storm Sewer) z,lM. CONTRACT 90-14, Approve Final Payment/Authorize City Maintenance (Stafford Place - f� Storm Sewer) 2,11..N. CONTRACT 89-22, Approve Final Payment/Authorize City Maintenance (Hills of Stonebridge 2nd Addition - Utilities) p7/x'0. PROJECT 466, Approve Settlement Agreement (Hope Assessment Appeal) l,NP. CONTRACT 90-17, Approve Change Order #1 (Wells #3 and #4 - Pump Repair) Q. PROJECT 601, Authorize Feasibility Report (Lone Oak Road & Lexington Avenue - PSignalization & Intersection Improvements) ,Z R. CONTRACT 90-13, Approve Change Order #1 (Efferess Addition - Storm Sewer) .2. S. FINAL PLAT, Finaserve Addition V. 7:00 - PUBLIC HEARINGS (SALMON) (;,SW:", A. PROJECT 610, Oaks of Bridgewater 2nd Addition - Streets & Utilities . PROJECT 589R, Elrene Road and Trails End Road - Utilities & Street Reconstruction . PROJECT 546, Cedarvale Boulevard - Overlay P1tspD. PROJECT 524, Final Assessment Roll, Johnny Cake Ridge Road - Streets & Sidewalks P VI. OLD BUSINESS (ORCHID) P `OA. BLACKHAWK PARK Improvements B. RECONSIDERATION, Waiver of Development Fees, Trinity Lone Oak Church Expansion/ AP Remodeling P. 'Z C. AMENDMENT, City of Eagan, to City Code Chapter 11, Land Use Regulations (Zoning) , to I Allow Pawn Shops as a Permitted Use in Retail/Commerical Zoning Districts CONSIDERATION of Seneca Plant Development Agreement - Proposed Revision to Schedule Regarding Incinerator Odor Control Improvements Re 1/4 E. ORDINANCE Amendment, City of Eagan, Amending Eagan City Code Chapter 6, Entitled "Other Business Regulations and Licensing," by Amending Section 6.34 Regarding Tabacco Products; and by Adopting by Reference Eagan City Code Chapter 1 and Section 6.99 `•� F. ORDINANCE Amendment, City of Eagan, Amending Eagan City Code Chapter 4, Entitled e' "Construction Licensing, Permits and Regulations, " Including Signs, Excavations, and Mobile Home Parks" by Amending Section 4.20 Regarding Placement, Erection and maintenance of Signs, and Adopting by Reference Eagan City Code Chapter 1 and Sec 4.99 (Request to Continue to the THURSDAY. May 23. 1991, Regular City Council Meeting) VIII. NEW BUSINESS (TAN) ft 1'47 A. BUILDING PERMIT for Tower and Equipment Building, Cellular One at Deerwood Drive and I-35E f (.ssB. RESOLUTION Acknowledging Trunk Highway 149 Corridor Study �S I C. VARIANCE, Crate Prospects, Ltd. , to Exceed the Maximum of 5% Retail for an Allowed Use P' in a Limited Industrial Zoning District, Located in the Bell Lexington Addition in the SW 1/4 of the SW 1/4 of Sec 2 Co SD. VARIANCE, Barbara Robinson, of Approximately 4' to the 10' Side Yard Setback, Located on Lot 4, Block 2, Fairway Hills Addition "0E. SPECIAL USE PERMIT, Dakota Electric Association, to Allow the Construction of an ,Q 1 Electric Substation and the Accompanying Transmission Line on Part of Lot 1, Block 1, �f West Publishing 1st Addition 9F COMPREHENSIVE GUIDE PLAN AMENDMENT to the Public Utilities Element Which Updates the F71 . Public Utilities Element to 1990/1991 and Revises the Public Utilities Element for Conformance with Metropolitan System Plans lG?}G. PRELIMINARY PLAT, Sky View Addition/Lahner-Dunn, Consisting of Three Lots on . P. Approximately 16.4 AG (Agricultural) Acres Located Along the East Side of Dodd Road and South of Farm Road in the SW 1/4 of Sec 36 H. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT, Trans X, to Allow a Truck and Freight Terminal in an LI (Light Industrial) District on Lot 6, Eagandale Center Industrial Park #2 Located Along Lone Oak Circle in the SW 1/4 of Sec 2 n y�.I I. VARIANCE, United Mortgage Corporation, of 15' to the Required 50' Setback Off of 1 Wescott road, Lot 25, Block 1 and Lot 1, Block 4, Hills of Stonebridge VIIII. ADDITIONAL ITEMS (GOLD) ?, ;),-2,1 A. CONTRACT 91-04, Approve Plans/Authorize Advertisement for Bids (Oaks of Bridgewater 2nd Addition) c.2 1 B. REQUEST for Waiver of Warranty Maintenance Bond Requirement (Cray Addition, Project 87-X and 89-E) .y.1 C. REVIEW Dakota Electric Association Fee Request for Utility Permit Issuance (Woodlands p / North and Elrene Road) IX. ADMINISTRATIVE AGENDA (GREEN) X. VISITORS TO BE HEARD (for those persons not on agenda) XI. ADJOURNMENT MEMO TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCILMEMBERS FROM: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES DATE: MAY 1, 1991 SUBJECT: AGENDA INFORMATION FOR THE MAY 7, 1991 CITY COUNCIL MEETING ADOPT ACrEMAAPPROVE MINUIES After approval is given to the May 7, 1991 City Council agenda, Special City Council minutes for the March 12, 1991, April 2, 1991, April 9, 1991 and April 23, 1991 meetings and regular minutes for the April 16, 1991 meeting, the following items are in order for consideration. DEPARTMENT HEAD BUSINESS There are no Department Head Business items at this time. Agenda Information Memo May 7, 1991 City Council Meeting There are nineteen (19) items on the agenda referred to as Consent Items requiring one (1) motion by the City Council. If the City Council wishes to discuss any of the items in further detail, those items should be removed from the Consent Agenda and placed under Additional Items unless the discussion required is brief. PERSONNEL ITEMS A. PERSONNEL ITEMS: Item 1. Seasonal Utility Maintenance Workers--After interviews,it is the recommendation of Superintendent of Utilities Connolly and Utility Supervisors Heuer and Schwanz that George Scott, Derrick Sharpe and Darren Wilke be hired as seasonal utility maintenance workers. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the hiring of George Scott, Derrick Sharpe and Darren Wilke as seasonal utility maintenance workers. Item 2. Seasonal Street Maintenance Worker -- After interviews, it is the recommendation of Superintendent of Streets/Equipment Erhart and Street Supervisor Struve that Jamie Witt be hired as a seasonal street maintenance worker. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the hiring of Jamie Witt as a seasonal street maintenance worker. Item 3. Resignation/Municipal Center Receptionist -- The City has received a letter of resignation from Kimberly Rau, the full-time receptionist at the Eagan Municipal Center. Given the current budget concerns, staff is presently evaluating the structuring of the position and various alternatives for replacement and/or reorganization. A recommendation will be made to Council with Monday's Administrative Agenda packet or with the May 21 Council meeting packet. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To accept the resignation of Kimberly Rau, the full-time receptionist at the Eagan Municipal Center. c).2 Agenda Information Memo May 7, 1991 City Council Meeting PERSONNEL ITEMS CONTINUED: Item 4. Resignation/Police Officer,Promotion/Police Officer&Hiring/Community Service Officer-- Curtis Sisco, a police officer with the City of Eagan, has notified the City that he intends to resign from the department as of July 3, 1991. Beginning May 19 through that date, Officer Sisco will use accumulated leave time. Due to the lengthy process of training a new officer and the fact that the department is currently operating under full strength, Chief of Police Geagan is recommending that John Serier II be immediately promoted from Community Service Officer to Police Officer. City Administrator Hedges concurs with this recommendation. It would then be necessary to hire a new Community Service Officer. The next person on the hiring list for this position is Jeff Stender. It would be appropriate for the Council to approve his hiring at this time, contingent upon successful completion of the City's psychological, medical and drug testing procedures. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To acknowledge Officer Curt Sisco's intent to resign as of July 3, 1991; to approve the promotion of John Serier II from Community Service Officer to Police Officer; and to approve the hiring of Jeff Stender as a Community Service Officer, contingent upon successful completion of the City's psychological, medical and drug testing procedures. Item 5. Informational -- Due to the length of time between Council meetings, it was necessary for City Administrator Hedges to approve the hiring of the following seasonal positions: Erick Tubbs as a seasonal parks maintenance worker and Jeremy Klotz as a seasonal street maintenance worker. No action is required on the part of the Council for this item. PLUMBERS LICENSES B. Licenses, Plumbers--The City Code requires that plumbing contractor operating within the City of Eagan be licensed on an annual basis. Enclosed on page ✓ is a list of firms whose applications are in order for consideration by the Council at this time. Please note that Leon Duda Plumbing Service is also in order for consideration for a water softener license at this time. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the plumbers licenses and water softener license as presented. Agenda Information Memo May 7, 1991 City Council Meeting TREE MAINTENANCE CONTRACTOR LICENSE C. License, Tree Maintenance Contractor, Henning and Rhode Associates--City Code requires that tree maintenance contractors be licensed on an annual basis. Staff is in receipt of an application by Dave McConnel on behalf of Henning and Rhode Associates. All documentation has been received and the application is in order for consideration by the Council at this time. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the tree maintenance contractor license for Henning and Rhode Associates as presented. EXTENSION/AMERICAN LEGION MEETING FACILITY D. Extension, Provision of Facility for American Legion Post--In the fall of 1990, the Eagan American Legion Post requested the temporary use of City facilities for their monthly meetings. In recognition of this temporary request and to provide the Council an opportunity to review the arrangement on a regular basis, the Council approved an arrangement to permit the post to meet in City facilities for six months. Those meetings have occurred on the second Thursday of the month in the Municipal Center Conference Rooms or lunch room. The City is in receipt of correspondence from the American Legion Post requesting an extension of this arrangement. Staff has had no problems with the current arrangement and consideration of a six month extension would be in order. Staff has also received indications from the American Legion that they are pursuing alternative facilities which they hope to have in place sometime in the future. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve an extension of the arrangement by which the American Legion Post utilizes City facilities for monthly meetings for an additional six months. DECLARATION OF SURPLUS FIRE APPARATUS E. Declaration of Surplus Property and Request to Donate Outdated Self Contained Breathing Apparatus (SCAB) to Kettle River and Kerrick Fire Departments--Enclosed on pages }o you will find a memorandum from Fire Chief Southorn relative to the above referenced self-contained breathing apparatus. Fire Chief Southorn is recommending that the City donate this equipment to two small fire departments in northern Minnesota. Were the City to dispose of the units separately, it is anticipated that a maximum of $600 in additional revenue would be made. This action would cover 13 units. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the declaration of surplus property and to donate the surplus self-contained breathing apparatus to the Kettle River and Kerrick Fire Departments. MAY 7, 1991 PLUMBERS LICENSES 1 . A-AARON' S, A Division of Waste, Inc. 2 . Leon Duda Plumbing Service * 3 . Neu Plumbing 4 . William F. Ridler Plbg & Htg. * also a Water Softener license 4Y- ea . IN,t 146 R: `er--�a _-- - � . -r o Eagan Fire Department TO: Tom Hedges, City Administrator FROM: Ken Southorn, Fire Chief DATE: April 22 , 1991 RE: Surplus SCBA Units In an earlier communication, the fire department requested authorization to sell or otherwise dispose of some outdated Self Contained Breathing Apparatus (SCAB) . Since that communication we have had an interest expressed by two smaller fire departments from northern Minnesota. We would like authorization to donate these units to the Kettle River and Kerrick Fire Departments. Eagan would realize a maximum of only about $600. 00 for all the units. The two departments will have to expend about $300. 00 per unit to bring the SCBA' s up to specifications. Since these departments are small and have a very limited budget, we felt they would need most of their funds for the upgrades. One department currently has only three SCBA' s for the entire department. With your approval , we will initiate the transfer to the Kettle River and Kerrick Fire Departments. KRS/kmk 3795 Pilot Knob Road • Eagan, Minnesota 55122 • (612)454-5274 Agenda Information Memo May 7, 1991 City Council Meeting FEE SCHEDULE AMENDMENT/FINGERPRINTING F. Amendment to Fee Schedule,Police Department for Public Fingerprinting--Enclosed on pages ' and 9 is a copy of a memorandum and fee survey recently conducted by the Police Department. As a consequence of the survey, the department is requesting approval of a ten dollar fee for fingerprinting services for employment, passports, etc. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve an amendment to the City fee schedule establishing a ten dollar fee for public fingerprinting. • 7 11 _ r ,q police department Ilw •N' ti �� -'+�� PATRICK J.GEAGAN .a y+s Chief of Polrce ` 11„t,( city of Cogan KENNETH D ASZMANN Opernvons Captain 3830 Pilot Knob Road THOMAS EGAN Eagan, Minnesota 55122 Mayo, Phone: (612)454-3900 DAVID KGUSTAFSON FAX: (612)454-0718 PAMELA McCREA TIM PAWLENTY THEODORE WACHTER Council Members THOMAS HEDGES City Administrator EUGENE VAN OVERBEKE City Clerk April 17 , 1991 TO: TOM HEDGES, CITY ADMINISTRATOR FROM: PAT GEAGAN, CHIEF OF POLICE SUBJECT: FEE CHARGE FOR PUBLIC FINGERPRINTING The Police Department recently conducted a fee charge analysis of various services currently provided to the public. I have attached a copy of the survey for your review. The fees currently charged by the Police Department are comparable to other agencies in all, except for public fingerprinting. The Police Department currently fingerprints approximately five to seven people per week for free. The reasons for fingerprinting are for employment, passports, etc. Fingerprinting is normally done by appointment, but walk-in requests are accommodated during the hours of 8 : 00 to 4 : 30, Monday-Friday. I am requesting that the Police Department be authorized to charge a fee of $10. 00 for fingerprinting. Would you place this request on the consent agenda for City Council approval . Please call , if you have any questions. Patrick Ge ga Chief of soli e PJG: lb Attachment g THE LONE OAK TREE. . .THE SYMBOL OF STRENGTH AND GROWTH IN OUR COMMUNITY Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer rro coo WtTJ 1 r L10 ti Mu1 t9 t+1 Hz ox z w 6 � ' in 10 ‹m 46 x 4n an . y g C3 o N °° o SZO 1 0 0 fa o ° 0 o • Ey HC4 O+ F1 • 0 5GOt4 U 9d N 0 0 r 1-4 03 003 CH N I o ati1 b IEn 4c M d N • Nl*n m 2 X4 N 46 n N 4.+ UT in H w w A 0 w t7 UT o o 0 0 ;" 0 0 � 0 0 0 N nR170H yy� 0 r3/3MM 04 4A 4A v y U1A an 0 . I K [CT79SjK HV1 't1Cw Mo o-i L4 -3 N N q • v N H 1-30-3P10 0o PI 1-1 o 0 O N O _ 0-3 LA • y2 yo NH\ 0 ZL6 % Ll O t"w O N H F Z LA MOB ,C1 Cr tip N ,0 PI CA g M 03 C c 0 HRI� r t O N N ., i vs N H vs H 1 , t.n 719 IA 0 46 O N Cyzq oz 0 46 n Ut Cr 2 Gta 0 C. 0 o � 2 t3 0 1tg t"0 C9O � F 0 CA A H i i 0 vow. _______ 777 n tq ,Pw y,pw y �' Oa44La �JM0, OMor+1 0Utr31 M R rm O tMil� tC3*1 11 -1' zx ".,3' ON ' M �j mj o o t1 in P3 0 46 Cl UT M 6)N 11 H C O PI 0 0 M • O UT O 'C 111 ro PI O 'V • N0'V yzyro �-ltro=1 MOgM ''•3 M Z Z 70 46`Z 0 in U�.M"d O'.b t" O [A N .-3'A N .. .0 O � ,.3z ..30!G rr3 0 70 9 .. _0=I _ O O Agenda Information Memo May 7, 1991 City Council Meeting WITHDRAWAL FROM POLICE ACCREDITATION PROGRAM G. Accreditation, Eagan Police Department Formal Withdrawal from Program--Enclosed on pages /7 and 7g, you will find a memorandum from Police Chief Geagan relative to the fiscal constraints which diminish the department's ability to pursue formal police accreditation. While the accreditation process has been supported by the City and has significant merit, it does involve additional expense and staff time which are unavailable under the current budget constraints. As a consequence of these circumstances, Chief Geagan is recommending that the City formally withdraw from the police accreditation process. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve a formal withdrawal from the police accreditation process for the Eagan Police Department. 1 __ ;E police department _ ,, °1 PATRICK J.GEAGAN C�ie�of Golice �1N111 city f as an KEN ONphleioiPol/cMANN X11 y 9 3830 Pilot Knob Road THOMAS EGAN Eagan, Minnesota 55122 Mayor Phone: (612)454-3900 DAVIDK.GUSTAFSON FAX: (612)454-0718 PAMELA McCREA TIM PAWLENTY THEODORE WACHTER Council Members April 9 , 1991 THOMAS HEDGES City Adm,nistrator EUGENE VAN OVERBEKE TO: TOM HEDGES, CITY ADMINISTRATOR `"y"r` FROM: PAT GEAGAN, CHIEF OF POLICE SUBJECT: ACCREDITATION As we recently discussed, I am requesting the City of Eagan and the Eagan Police Department formally withdraw from the process of Police Accreditation. Although I feel this program has a great deal of merit, I think there are a number of reasons in today' s economic climate that severely hinder our ability to complete the process. In 1989 when our Accreditation Process first began, the Police Department had not felt the impact of some of the staff shortages in several of the divisions. These staffing shortages are continuing to worsen while the City continues to suffer financial constraints and unfortunately Accreditation is labor intensive. Another area of concern is that the Commission on Law Enforcement Accreditation has initiated a victim/witness assistance requirement. Part of the requirement is that the department identify employees of high rank or professional non-sworn status who would devote at least part-time to a victim/witness assistance function. This requirement essentially mandates that our department would need to hire an individual to fill this function. This chapter, which was approved in July, 1990, as well as several others, would inflict further financial hardship on the Police Department and reduce our ability to provide basic Law Enforcement Services. My intent is to - continue updating our departments Policy and Procedure Manual using the Accreditation Standards as a guide. It is my hope this process would be completed within the next 12 months. As I indicated before, the Accreditation Process, to date, has been valuable in forcing the department to look at issues we may or may not have been aware of and address them in a timely manner. With that thought, I feel this process has met with some success. THE LONE OAK TREE. . .THE SYMBOL OF STRENGTH AND GROWTH IN OUR COMMUNITY Equal Opportunity/A1ffjrmative Action Employer ACCREDITATION Page 2 You may also be interested in knowing the cities of St. Paul, Richfield and Plymouth have had to drop out of the program for similar reasons. Patrick 2 ea. .n Chief of -.li - PJG: lb Agenda Information Memo May 7, 1991 City Council Meeting WAIVER OF PLAT/DUPLEX LOT SPLIT H. Waiver of Plat, Mark Calvin, Duplex Lot Split to Allow Individual Ownership of Lot 5, Block 1, Oakwood Heights 2nd Addition--An application has been received of Mark Calvin requesting a duplex lot split for the above referenced property located at 4431 and 4433 Lynx Court. For additional information in this regard, please refer to the Community Development Department staff report which is enclosed on pages /7L through g for your review. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the waiver of plat/duplex lot split for Mark Calvin on Lot 5, Block 1, Oakwood Heights 2nd Addition as presented. SUBJECT: WAIVER OF PLAT - DUPLEX LOT SPLIT APPLICANT: MARK CALVIN LOCATION: LOT 5, BLOCK 1, OAKWOOD HEIGHTS 2ND ADD. EXISTING ZONING: R-2 (DUPLEX) DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: MAY 7, 1991 DATE OF REPORT: APRIL 30, 1991 COMPILED BY: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT APPLICATION SUMMARY: An application has been submitted by Mark Calvin requesting a Waiver of Plat for a duplex lot split to allow individual ownership. The existing duplex is located at 4431/4433 Lynx Court (P.I.D. #10-53801-050-01) and meets all building setback requirements. Both units are served by separate utility services. If approved, this Waiver of Plat shall be subject to all Code requirements and the following condition: 1. The Waiver of Plat shall be recorded at the County within 30 days and documentation brought back to the City. i• FARM FNAr� '� ::i? �®` � iC'z � � � 872 ` . arm 4 —' ' r- Nb �i -► 0- ! ' 17_ " r •�d,�- . r. �, •L� a �• �� �f#�b1. ;.y ai:®?a;i�p`� Co ft( RD 1,7; • HILLS FPM", \\ •.3. Str •t Map Zoning Map leLClIllate JUT: 0 •• / Mark Calvin Construction Co. it'll ilii,\,` Sheet 1 of 2 (06-06-90) DELMAR H. SCHWANZ LAND ellinItTORIL..C. 111011~111I Who.Low et TM Owe of•6wwrh 14TH SOUTH RORER,TRAR, ROSEMOUNT,MINNESOTA DIII SUM-1755 SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE c t,8 Itlir RE y� fiI b 0 (e3 Drainage and _"gr arc Utility Easement /,/ N q 4 6,'x'9/SQ.cr. /, / ---_- _,,,,4 Lc, L V� �o 4 10 / PARCEL B 'i f.•� c '0 \\1\ �� •?SQ.GT. E. .3� P ;or eti _-�_ GJ / z , h . PARCEL A N PI' a ti — v 4 l a ^el / -,s // // cp1.°I �. e•,,,, / 6�,/\ -- ♦' / ,,IS s :• / // -1.5 /\ .1,1" ,f° ` ` \ s ti ti Scale: 1 inch 30 feet s \ 0 Y1 s S 2p'/ \' / 4 s\ o O Denotes iron monument `� by, A� O �\ / \ O Denotes setback iron �‘ k 0 3 . / , . /o A1 o c e D 10/3 Denotes existing elevation 1\00 3 R( �– r Denotes proposed elevation 1O\� �` P VI-6 CJJ-i° ° °0 % / /bd oq. I hereby certify that this is a true and correct representation of Lot 5, Block 1, ohrwoo1) ITEIGITTS 2ND ADDITION, according to the recorded plat thereof, Dakota County, Minnesota. Also showing the location of a proposed house as staked thereon. Dated: March 28, 1986. ()A/ Building location verified 06-06-90. /, No No property corners set for the purpose of the attached descriptions. \\ 0oaN E S v ,., *.- ". I ' DELMAR H. 1 I 1 SCHWANZ } / / .�:• —8625— jct. L / ..I uIGVl 161%,14;,... •.t& ?N tIREOTA REOt1TRAT/ON NO.M!{ h, ,mdrrrtnnmtrtn`a Agenda Information Memo May 7, 1991 City Council Meeting APPROVE FINAL DRAFT, 1991 COMPREHENSIVE SEWER POLICY PLAN I. Approve Final Draft, 1991 Comprehensive Sewer Policy Plan--Presently, the City is updating portions of its Comprehensive Land Use Guide Plan to conform to the latest requirements of the Metropolitan Council. One of the elements of that Comprehensive Land Use Guide Plan deal with public utilities. The major utility that the Metropolitan Council is interested in reviewing with the revisions of the Comprehensive Land Use Plan pertains to water quality and sanitary sewer. With the recent adoption of the Comprehensive Water Quality Management Plan, many of the Metropolitan Council's requirements have been addressed. However, the most recent 1988 update of the Comprehensive Sewer Policy Plan needed to be further revised to comply with the most recent standards and requirements. Subsequently, the Council authorized a revision to this Comprehensive Sewer Policy Plan earlier this year. These revisions are based on the newest population projections based on the 1990 census and future growth projections. This draft update has now been completed and is being presented to the City Council for their formal approval which will allow staff to distribute this draft to other metropolitan agencies to solicit their input and comments before the final plan is prepared at the end of the summer. Enclosed on page /7 is a summary of the 20 year projections for residential and employment populations and their related projected sewer flows. Also enclosed on pages /p and /9 is an executive summary with recommendations contained in this report. While the remainder of their report contains detailed information and calculations, it is available for the Council's review under separate cover. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the final draft of the 1991 Comprehensive Sewer Policy Plan and authorize its distribution to regional agencies for formal review and comment. -in IR TIER I - SEWER ELEMENT OF COMPREHENSIVE PLAN III This report provides detailed information on a number of different aspects of Eagan' s sanitary sewer system. A brief synopsis of the results is pre- IIIsented below: CITY OF EAGAN METROPOLITAN COUNCIL PROJECTIONS * Estimated Estimated Average Sewered Estimated Estimated No. Sewage Flow Illi Year Population No. of Homes of Employees (MGD) 1990 42,000 16,500 20,000 5.35-6.01 2000 52,000 21,400 27,000 6.94-7.91 1 2010 61,000 26,200 36,000 8.50-9.69 III * Taken from the Metropolitan Council's 1988 Systems Information Statement. 111: CITY PROJECTIONS * Estimated N Estimated Average Sewered Sewage Flow Year Population (MGD) N 1990 46,389 5.85 2000 60,292 9.71 IIII 2010 73,674 13.60 * Based on the City's 1991 Land Use Guide Plan. See Sections 'Land Usage and Population" and 'Design Criteria" in the Tier II portion III of this report. kitFigure 7 at the back of this report is a map showing the interceptor service areas and intercommunity boundaries. iiiInformation on the City's strategy on infiltration and inflow (I/I) can be III found on Page 25. n• `,r L. t 1 r�l N - 6 - } , s t. zt, 4 5.4 R r 1 7'0 r , - N / -7 _ ___,-- --,27.4-...7.. .:45. -tz,v;•••,--... -,_____-__., __-„.;,,_ _____ __ . _ __., :., _ _.„. ,.....f___ , _ _,__ ___, _ IIII SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS The Comprehensive Sewer Policy Plan presented herein is intended to serve as an inventory of Eagan's existing sanitary sewer trunk facilities and as a guide to completing the remaining sections of the trunk system. The document IIIalso serves to meet the sewer planning requirements for both the Metropolitan Waste Control Commission and the Metropolitan Council. The City was divided into five major districts with each district then being divided into subdistricts. The areas and residential units of each sub- '!" district are presented in Appendix A. Unit rates of wastewater generation were assigned to each land use category with the resulting flows for each sub- district presented in Appendix B. EllThe trunk sewer system is presented on Figure 7 at the back of this report . The information on Figure 7 includes major districts and subdistricts , existing and proposed trunk sewers with pipe sizes and direction IIIof flow indicated and lift stations and force mains. Reference points are provided along each line and point by point design flows and capacities are IIIpresented in Appendix C. Design data for the lift stations are presented in Appendix D. Adjustments in the routing and size of the trunk facilities can be III: expected as determined by the conditions at the time of final design. UHowever, the general concepts should be adhered to for assurance of an economical and adequate ultimate system. .._.. .c.,..Ili it') ... r-44)<7'. 1; �.) ' -co- Pi.�f % I - 48 - rJ �• 1 v.,`. Ili 49514R �1 i ,�? P,-l. . , e Ni ts'' 2 I The estimated cost of completion of the trunk system is $964,950. A Capital Improvement Program for completion of the trunk sanitary sever system in Eagan in presented in Table 11. The following recommendations are presented for the Council' s • consideration: 1. That the Council adopt this report as the Comprehensive Sever Policy Plan for the City of Eagan and that it be submitted to the Metropolitan Council, the Metropolitan Waste Control Commission, and neighboring communities for review and comments. 2. That the current policy of assessing for trunk sanitary sewer service on an area basis be retained and that City staff determine future rates based on the information in this document. 3 . That the existing ordinances and inspection policies for on-site dis- posal systems be revised and expanded and that a monitoring program be established. I4. That existing provisions be maintained for controlling Infiltration/ Inflow into the sanitary sewer system during new sewer construction. 5. That the Capital Improvement Program as outlined herein be adopted. 14.4)A.. .5N0 cit„ A p P I • L: - 49 - III I 495148 I /7 Agenda Information Memo May 7, 1991 City Council Meeting PROJ. 613, RECEIVE FEASIBILITY REPORT/ ORDER HEARING-WILLBROOK ADD. J. Project 613,Receive Feasibility Report/Order Public Hearing (Willbrook Addition)-- On April 16, 1991, the City Council received a Petition from the Developer of the proposed Willbrook Addition and authorized the preparation of a feasibility report for the installation of streets and utilities within this residential development east of Lexington Avenue between Falcon Way and Wescott Road. This feasibility report has now been completed and is being presented to the Council for their consideration of scheduling a public hearing to formally present and discuss these proposed improvements. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To receive the feasibility report for Project 613 (Willbrook Addition-Streets and Utilities) and schedule a public hearing to be held on June 4, 1991. PROJ. 584, RECEIVE FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL RAHN ROAD K. Project 584, Receive Assessment Roll/Order Public Hearing (Rahn Road Reconstruction)--The reconstruction of Rahn Road under the above-referenced project has been completed to the extent where all costs associated with this project can be calculated. Subsequently, the final assessment roll has been prepared and is being presented to the City Council for their consideration of scheduling a public hearing to formally present the final costs associated with this project to the affected property owners. It is staff's intention to schedule neighborhood meeting(s) with the affected property owners prior to the final assessment public hearing to review any concerns or questions they may have pertaining to their final assessments. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To receive the final assessment roll for Project 584 (Rahn Road Reconstruction) and schedule a final assessment public hearing to be held on June 18, 1991. JO Agenda Information Memo May 7, 1991 City Council Meeting PROJ. 578. RECEIVE FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL SIBLEY TERM. IND. PK L. Project 578, Receive Final Assessment Roll/Order Public Hearing (Sibley Terminal Industrial Park-Storm Sewer)--The installation of the storm sewer improvements within the Sibley Terminal Industrial Park has been completed, all costs tabulated and the final assessment roll prepared. This roll is being presented to the Council for their consideration of scheduling a public hearing where the final costs associated with this improvement can be formally presented to the affected property owners. It is the staff's intention to schedule an informational meeting with the affected property owners prior to the public hearing to review the final costs and answer any questions or concerns that may arise. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To receive the final assessment roll for Project 578 (Sibley Terminal Industrial Park-Storm Sewer) and schedule a public hearing to be held on June 4, 1991. CONTRACT 90-14. APPROVE FINAL PAYMENT HILLS OF STONEBRIDGE 2ND ADD. M. Contract 90-14, Approve Final Payment/ Authorize City Maintenance (Stafford Place-Storm Sewer)--The City has received a request for final payment from the Contractor along with a certification from the City's Consulting Engineer that all work has been completed in accordance with the plans and specifications for the installation of the storm sewer improvements to the Stafford Place development. All final inspections have performed by representatives of the Public Works Department and found to be in order for favorable Council action. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the 3rd and final pay request for Contract 90-14 (Stafford Place-Storm Sewer) in the amount of $4,251.19 and authorize acceptance for perpetual maintenance subject to contractual warranty requirements. c2/ Agenda Information Memo May 7, 1991 City Council Meeting CONTRACT 89-22, APPROVE FINAL PAYMENT HILLS OF STONEBRIDGE 2ND ADDITION N. Contract 89-22, Approve Final Payment/Authorize City Maintenance (Hills of Stonebridge 2nd Addition-Utilities)--The City has received a request for final payment from the Contractor along with a certification from the City's Consulting Engineer that all work has been completed in accordance with the plans and specifications for the installation of watermain, storm sewer improvements and services for the Hills of Stonebridge Plat 2 Addition. All final inspections have performed by representatives of the Public Works Department and found to be in order for favorable Council action. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the 2nd and final pay request for Contract 89-22 (Hills of Stonebridge 2nd Addition-Utilities) in the amount of $11,846.60 and authorize acceptance for perpetual maintenance subject to contractual warranty requirements. PROJ 466, APPROVE SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT (HOPE ASSESSMENT APPEAL) O. Project 466, Approve Settlement Agreement (Hope Assessment Appeal--As a result of the assessment appeal certified with District Court, representatives of the City and the property owner reviewed the facts and have agreed to a settlement agreement pertaining to the assessments associated with the upgrading of Pilot Knob Road under the above- referenced project. This settlement agreement was prepared by the City Attorney's Office, reviewed by the Director of Public Works and agreed to by the property owner. Subsequently, it is being presented to the City Council for their consideration of favorable action. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the stipulation for settlement agreement for assessments associated with Project 466 as it pertains to parcel #10-16400-082-00 (Hope) and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute all related documents. cZc7.? Agenda Information Memo May 7, 1991 City Council Meeting CONT. 90-17. APPROVE CHANGE ORDER #1 (WELLS #3 & #4-PUMP REPAIR P. Contract 90-17, Approve Change Order #1 (Wells #3 and #4 - Pump Repair)--As a part of the Public Works Utility Maintenance Divisions preventative maintenance inspection program of our water supply system, Wells #3 and #4 were removed for inspection and repair as appropriate under Contract 90-17. As a part of the inspection of the well shaft and coupling mechanisms, it was found that significant erosion and corrosion has occurred in the materials made of carbon steel. Upon evaluating the cost of replacement with similar type material as specified in the original contract with alternate stainless steel materials, it was determined that the additional cost in relationship to the increased life expectancy and additional safety factor against potential failure is found to be beneficial to the City. Subsequently, a cost estimate was requested from the contractor and is being presented to the City Council for their consideration. If approved, the City will replace all existing carbon steel shafting and couplings with stainless steel material increasing the life expectancy by three years for an additional cost of$3,281.41. The Public Works Director and Superintendent of Utilities along with consulting engineers strongly recommend favorable Council action on this Change Order. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve Change Order #1 to Contract 90-17 (Wells #3 and #4, Pump Repair) and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute all related documents. PROJ. 601, AUTHORIZE FEASIBILITY REPORT LONE OAK RD. & LEXINGTON AVE. Q. Project 601, Authorize Feasibility Report (Lone Oak Road and Lexington Avenue- Signalization and Intersection Improvements)--As a part of the City's review of the County's 5 Year Capital Improvement Program (CIP), the County honored the City's request to delay the proposed upgrading of Lone Oak Road (County Road #26) from 1991 to 1994. However, the County has indicated that the signalization and intersection improvements of Lone Oak Road with Lexington Avenue should be performed as soon as possible,preferably in 1991. Subsequently, the County is proposing to still continue with that portion of Lone Oak Road improvement at its intersection with Lexington Avenue. Subsequently, it would be appropriate for the Council to authorize the preparation of a feasibility report to allow staff and opportunity to evaluate the potential cost to the City and the affected property owners who may be assessed under this project so that we may proceed with the appropriate public hearings in a timely manner. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To authorize the feasibility report for Project 601 (Lone Oak Road and Lexington Avenue-Signalization and Intersection Improvements). .23 Agenda Information Memo May 7, 1991 City Council Meeting CONT. 90-13, APPROVE CHANGE ORDER #1 EFFRESS ADD.-STORM SEWER R. Contract 90-13, Approve Change Order #1 (Effress Addition-Storm Sewer)--This contract provided for the installation of additional storm sewer facilities to service the Effress Addition. During construction, the design elevation of the proposed storm sewer conflicted with the existing watermain facilities which were at a different elevation than shown on the as-built record plans used to design the storm sewer to begin with. Due to the fact that this conflict was not discovered until construction was well under way, it was not possible to change the design elevation of the storm sewer to avoid the conflict. Subsequently, the contractor had to incur additional costs associated with reconstructing and lowering the watermain facilities at an additional amount of $3,076.30. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve Change Order #1 to Contract 90-13 (Effress Addition-Storm Sewer) and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute all related documents. • a�' Agenda Information Memo May 7, 1991 City Council Meeting FINAL PLAT/FINASERVE ADDITION S. Final Plat, Finaserve Addition--Documents relative to the above-referenced final plat are currently being processed by the applicant and the Community Development Department. If all items are completed and executed in time for next Tuesday's meeting, the applications will be in order for approval. If not, a recommendation will be made to continue this item at the beginning of the meeting. A copy of the final plat as it appears for filing at Dakota County is enclosed on page for your review. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the final plat for Finaserve Addition as presented. o�v • I is ! ii2i. �i i ! 1 !1 1.1 1 j`'` - tt : s I Li S:' S S Li i r - si . 1 I I i = i �� S I: i i• -. 1 :1. 11 11 - 1 1 ' - ! i 1: i _ 7i i r! 11s i 13 'i 3 1 i.' 1 ! II I 3 .� 3: it e_s =Fci - : , s I 13: i . :: :. i;; 1,1:1 3 i5 • •: ?! i :: 3 _si : i 1_ : i 3• 1 �: - i :iii = 1 _:: : i I.l i 14 i;: • • ;; • :i - F s t 1 Z 3 ! Er f ;iii :1••= 2 3 I - 1 : f 1 ii :1.1. it i I : I II li s ' • Z {t E• i i , - i i 1 i li i I = 3 - s I is s . 0 O - el li It -s s 6. k- i c„ :' ,_ Q !:= / r-s- - -r s..7 �.ti: F- CO - � ' _ ;.! ' W CC _ ,;: Liig - a:' ,),',. -5,4.3t..1.1".• -,ti • .1/4....14t1; ...r LL 1 t ..1. , 't,• r, _ � 1 i '"..t. 0 c: 1 C 14 33 ‘._ !• > >. r Sid •s f '/ ! I ' 7, i �,. / 1, :s, . ,;i I I - �� ii fi i .. --t�3t -� t ••5:1.13 tl is :i r' I a ■ t 1• Zr• • • ' : o ! i _ cX Agenda Information Memo May 7, 1991 City Council Meeting PUBLIC HEARINGS PROJ. 610, OAKS OF BRIDGEWATER 2ND ADD. STS & UTILS A. Project 610, Oaks of Bridgewater 2nd Addition (Streets & Utilities)--On April 2nd, the Council received the feasibility report for the above-referenced project and scheduled a public hearing to be held on May 7th. Enclosed on pages v,ar through is a copy of the feasibility report associated with these proposed improvements. All notic s have been published in the legal newspaper and sent to all affected property owners informing them of this public hearing. Any assessments associated with this project are limited to the developer and owner of this development. These improvements have been reviewed in detail with the developer and his representatives prior to the public hearing. Although they have waived their rights to the public hearing, staff felt it best to formally present this to meet the requirements of our bonding procedures as necessary to finance this project through special assessments. Therefore, there will be a limited presentation regarding this proposed improvement. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To close the public hearing and approve Project 610, Oaks of Bridgewater 2nd Addition (Streets and Utilities). 07 7 EA • ) •t `•� Wkt.' i Report for The Oaks of Bridgewater 2nd Addition Utility and Street Improvements Project No. 610 Eagan, Minnesota April, 1991 File No. 49515 4 Otto G.Bonestroo.P.E. Keith A.Gordon.P.E. Kenneth P.Anderson,P.E. Miles B.Jensen,PE. ii . Bones t roo Robert W Rosene.P.E. Richard W Foster,P.E. Mark R.Rolls,P.E. L.Phillip Gravel III,RE. Joseph C.Anderlik,P.E. Donald C.Burgardt,P.E. Robert C.Russek,A.I.A. Rene C.Plumart,A.I.A. Rosene Marvin L.Sorvala,P.E. Jerry A.Bourdon,P.E. Thomas E.Angus,P.E. Agnes M.Ring,A.I.C.P. Richard E.Turner,PE. Mark A.Hanson,P.E. Howard A.Sanford,P.E. Jerry D.Pertzsch,P.E. KAM Anderlik & Glenn R.Cook,P.E. Ted K.Field,P.E. Daniel J.Edgerton,PE. Cecilio Olivier,PE. Thomas E.Noyes.P.E. Michael T.Rautmann,P.E. Mark A.Seip,PE. Robert R.Dreblow,P.E. Robert G.Schunicht.P.E. Robert R.Pfefferle,P.E. Philip J.Caswell,P.E. Gary W.Morien,P.E. Associates Susan M.Eberlin,C.P.A. David O.Loskota.P.E. Ismael Martinez,PE. Charles A.Erickson 'J Thomas W.Peterson,P.E. Mark D.Wallis.P.E. Leo M.Pawelsky Michael C.Lynch,P.E. Thomas R.Anderson,A.I.A. Harlan M.Olson Engineers & Architects James R.Maland,P.E. Gary F.Rylander,P.E. April 12, 1991 Honorable Mayor and Council City of Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55122 Re: The Oaks of Bridgewater 2nd Addition Street and Utility Improvements Project No. 610 Our File No. 49515 Dear Mayor and Council: Attached is our report for The Oaks of Bridgewater 2nd Addition Street and Utility Improvements. The report presents and discusses the proposed street and utility improvements and includes a cost estimate and preliminary assessment roll. We will be pleased to meet with the Council and other interested parties at a mutually convenient time to discuss this report. Sincerely, BONES ROO, RO ENE, ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES, INC. ; , �, 1 Ott l t„-----, Mark . Hanson MAH:li I hereby certify that this report was prepared by me • or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Registered Professional Engineer under he laws of the State of Minnesota. of / Mark A. Hanson Date: April 12, 1991 Reg. No., 14260 Approved by: _r�i �l Department ovblic Works Date: 4- (6, " C t 49515.RPT oZ 2335 West Highway 36 • St. Paul, Minnesota 55113 • 612-6364600 THE OAKS OF BRIDGEWATER 2ND ADDITION STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS EAGAN, MINNESOTA PROJECT NO. 610 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page No. TABLE OF CONTENTS 2. SCOPE 3. FIGURE NO. I - LOCATION PLAN 4. FEASIBILITY AND RECOMMENDATION 5. DISCUSSION 5. A. SANITARY SEWER 5. B. WATER MAIN 6. C. SERVICES 6. D. STOR;\.. SEWER 6. E. STREET 7. EASEMENTS AND PERMITS 7. COST ESTIMATE 8. AREA TO BE INCLUDED 8. ASSESSMENTS 9. REVENUE. SOURCES 10. PROJECT SCHEDULE 11. APPENDIX A - PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE • 12. APPENDIX B - PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL 16. FIGURE NO. 2 - SANITARY SEWER LAYOUT FIGURE NO. 3 - WATER MAIN LAYOUT FIGURE NO. 4 - STORM SEWER LAYOUT FIGURE NO. 5 - STREET LAYOUT FIGURE NO. 6 - PROPOSED ASSESSMENT AREA 2. - 49515.RPT REPORT FOR THE OAKS OF BRIDGEWATER 2ND ADDITION STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS EAGAN, MINNESOTA PROJECT NO. 610 sCOP _ The ;ka is of Bridgewater 2nd Addition consists of 34 single family residential lots located r (sotnl east of the intersection of Wescott Road and Elrene Road). This t; -,Le Oohs of Bridgewater and will continue work constructed ci i:3 ;};i n:ojec i consists of the construction of sanitary sewer, water f' : . streets. Tlese municipal facilities will be provided by extending cons?r acted a _ e; previous improvement projects in the _ -,,r 111 :1 cra ing is completed to the design grade elevations tco <1r .. c. approved grading plan. . 3. ■ l mm0. Yankee Doodle Road 1........1 —--—--1 Fr--1-nr, 1.111 -L-1,1 f 1 , I t 1:::i'----------1 =mow modisr..1 I, op "s,..--i ' I la' N. lk, 1 1 en; f isaoshi.-.....NIS ) 1 MI 711-ZPI cS:I 1 /1 1 Ell i 41 i II a 11111 i/Pli .. -n C ' ;('\...„,--1 - 0 me . , 41 -- 1 , 1 i , v I, -7`— l C..) ,i_,-- ;-3.----'- ■-,,... _,IL 414. '4./1111111"...i •■ Nll LO Illk ' ..1',/- • 4111 ;17% Mk \ thiff,wit... /221' Ef4,.;:::■:.2 \,, i'vfr ' , ,)-'vott--:1 ,„,_,,.7...."---"t, --' ___, . j ,...,_,...,-. ..„,--.3,1-2,_, ..........i.: 4-r-- \\\ Nt-zt ---::''' \_.'--4"f--- --1',,,-. ---- -- ,--N, -,,- „.. ..- , .- ...1....:::_,-2..-. ,-_-_,..)-- -; \ 1 -: ,-,‘(,, '-_, --_-3r , ,—_-_.4., ,....,_,-,_-: N A I i '"--- ■ "--,r7-',...,....._LLL'—' i1 ,t-,1-7, •-• -r-r , ".--6,4 [_, ..... r...."°?:,--..--7',.-;.--.--7.----=•,---,----i''''''''''''' ""7-7r-'' c., ,,. 4 ');=7* ..• . , . _-_..__.-_,-•,...-. .. e-4- I, 0,:j '..-----ef• - / 4-," „4,\---n_"7-.-- e•-.-•-'•, q • y.)-,------'-'''■ '''''',`-`.- :''',, '/".""'":7 ,"."'-'*',` / -,,..- -.c---• ' j7.:1' --- e:•,‘".-4-....5._--2,.......,..7" - ),--/.._ ...,....,..., l'A.,_*-'..., „J.,.)- , ,,,,,,,IF - r\N\ 1 ,?",--",-('-,..:7;-... .,----, "7" ' ASO __,..„1 •ry,,...,,,„:"}„,, --,,_ 4 1 r,,, 7 ,47-7'_ ). ,.._,r`,7'1 ,, _ ,.....,„....., -----..:-.4,-/-);- ,_*,-,/-Y--:-___- , ,, _----------" I-„,.....,--_,,,,,,_, ir------`, -- _ --,....7,- .,.,. i,- -.--,e,- ,-,t--.1. — - _ -, / 1.; ',?-/$2.., .‘,./,<' ,,,t-..,-..„,- . . 1-4;),"thcrg '2,-.•-4r--7-4,\ ., L2C:it • . .4-.,,,`, ., .,,,,,,,ERWt:::,. -- -e-- --,...,,--rilt, am , 44 .7-1,-,•;4 I •-. \\''_ . '''''''""`"(c'ji -.__3,,L.-— -11 ::,---K-' i 1 44 t ,_ *„.......,_ MU —\\. 1 ■ , 1_, - ,t ..1.. ' ,..,..,..:•=1...-.1.,...1.,01,,-.10 a ---. ..- --- -- - , \ - re■ ' v r•,. ".....,, (Co. P d. No. ,.,7 C), NI L__ Project Location 0 2r-,,-- LOCAT,U;', Rosene Arderllk .& ? EA- \k V,*■*." -',,,----* /. -1 .. L 1:7; - ...J,--1 3 7 - F,C ... E. 1,L,. I 11 Associates \I , , ,.. - , ,-r-.- r, A "*".r-N t"-•y E noirsr.br• 6 Ar ch■I ec t. THE c.L.v.,. C.': L.--t, ...),... ... ,L-■ .-.N. 2no p-,,,..,LiLil/ 2335 West Highway 36 ?R , ':-.3 9 1 (:"._;r,i.,. 4-51`,- St. PAU, Minnesota 5.5113 FEASIBILITY AND RECOMMENDATIONS The project is feasible from an engineering standpoint and is in accordance with the objectives established in the City's Comprehensive Utility Plans. The project can best be carried out as one contract. DISCUSSION A. Sanitary Sewer - The sanitary sewer will consist of 8 inch diameter lateral sewer which will to an existing manhole constructed as part of the Bridle Ridge 1st Addition (Project 90- .neral layout of the sewer is illustrated on Figure No. 2 of this report. A sanitary i . is proposed that will provide future service to the west of the development. Gravity t to the homes as they are planned on the development grading plan is feasible. Caution. -xercised in construction of the proposed standard homes on the end of Hidden . .;v Trail to make sure that house elevations do not differ from those shown on the grading p .. A short section of sewer is also proposed along the south line of proposed Lot 13, Block Loprovide sewer service to proposed Lot 12, Block 3 (Chuck Hall's existing home). The SLR±-;=L:ny ,gin' er from the existing manhole to MH-3 and from MH-19 to MH-20 will warrant additional construction to minimize tree removal. Access to sanitary sewer manholes for maintenance will be provided by an 8' wide bituminous trail off of Elrene Road (see Figure No. 5). The proposed access trail will be constructed in Outlot A of Bridle Ridge 1st Addition and will be located in the back yards of 1f e stir homes. 5. 33 B. Water Main - The water main will consist of 6" diameter lateral in Hidden Meadow Trail, Quail Ridge Road,Hunters Overlook, and Bridgewater Drive. Water main will connect to stubs provided as part of The Oaks of Bridgewater 1st Addition. In addition, valves and hydrants will be provided as necessary. It is proposed to loop the water main in Hidden Meadow Trail with the existing water main in Wescott Road. This addition is located in the intermediate pressure zone and will experience static and residual pressures of 71 and 57 pounds respectively. C. Services - Sanitary sewer and water services are proposed to be constructed 15 feet beyond the property line. Sewer service lines are proposed to be 4" diameter and water service lines 1' diameter. eter. Sanitary sewer service risers will be required for lots 1, 2, and 10 of Block 1 and Lot 2 of Bock 3. in accordance with City standards, each riser will include a cleanout and be televised as part of the construction inspection. I . Storer Sewer - Storm sewer is proposed to be constructed to convey runoff from streets and adjacent areas. The proposed construction will include catch basins, manholes, and storm sewer. The majority of the storm water runoff from the development will be conveyed to a new storm water pond. This pond, Pond JP-21.1, will be constructed and graded by the developer. Storm water is being routed around Bald Lake into the new pond to minimize the nutrient loading to Bald Lake. Pond JP-21.1 serves as a water quality pond and helps to minimize the nutrient loading on Bald Lake. It is recommended that the pond be constructed as a two-cell pond for water quality purposes. The new pond has a direct drainage area of 19.9 acres and an indirect drainage area of 8.7 acres. Pond requirements for Pond JP-21.1 as presented in the Eagan Staff Report are listed below: 6. 3/1 Pond NWL HWL Storage, Wet Volume Outflow JP-21.1 841.00 843.8 4.6 ac.ft. 2.6 ac.ft. 7 cfs In addition, a skimmer or outlet control manhole between Ponds JP-21.1 and JP-21 is also proposed. The outlet will be sized to limit the discharge from Pond JP-21.1 to Pond JP-21 to a maximum of 7 cfs. The low area (landlocked) on Lots 1-3 of Block 3 will be serviced by an independent catch basin and 15" storm sewer discharging into Bald Lake (see Figure No. 4). The storm sewer will be sized to prevent water from rising above the proposed low window elevation (868.0) for a 100 year storm event. Overland drainage from Pond JP-19 will flow west into Bald Lake before affecting the proposed home on Lot 1, Block 3 (based on the preliminary grading plan). Overland drainage routes for other low landlocked areas must be provided as noted on the grading plan and should be indicated on the final plat. E. Street - The street construction will consist of a 28' wide (face to face) standard residential street within the platted roadway. In addition, it is proposed to widen Quail Ridge Road where it intersects with Wescott Road to match Woodland Trail to the north (see Figure No. 5). Center island construction is presently proposed for Hidden Meadow Trail and on Quail Ridge Road at Wescott Road. Streets will include surmountable concrete curb and gutter. Bituminous trail is proposed through Outlot A of Bridle Ridge 1st Addition to provide access to sanitary sewer manholes (see Figure No. 5). EASEMENTS AND PERMITS All required easements and right-of-way will be acquired as part of the plat. Additional easement that is not shown on the preliminary plat will be required between Lots 5 and 6 of Block 1 in order to provide a water main loop to Hidden Meadow Trail. A temporary 7. construction easement will be required on Lots 5 & 6, Block 4 of The Oaks of Bridgewater 1st Addition for sanitary sewer construction. Permits will be required from the MPCA, Minnesota Department of Health, and DNR. COST ESTIMATE A detailed cost estimate for this project is presented in Appendix A. The cost estimates do not include the normal 5% contingency since this report is being prepared along with the design of the project and more accurate quantity estimates are possible. The total estimated cost is $515,250. The total estimated cost includes legal, administrative, engineering, and interest costs of 30%. The estimated construction costs per lot are higher than normal due to deep sanitary sewer and large storm sewer. A summary of the estimated costs is shown below: PROJECT 610 ESTIMATED COST A. Sanitary Sewer $118,350 B. Water Main 59,500 C. Services 37,600 D. Storm Sewer 150,800 E. Streets 149.000 TOTAL ESTIMATED PROJECT COST $515,250 AREA TO BE INCLUDED The properties proposed to be assessed (as shown on the preliminary plat) are listed below and shown on Figure No. 6. 8� ASSESSMENT AREA THE OAKS OF BRIDGEWATER 2ND ADDITION . Block 1; Lots 1-15 Block 2; Lots 1-4 Block 3; Lots 1-15 The existing parcels included in Oaks of Bridgewater 2nd Addition are: Parcel 10-02300-013-02 Parcel 10-02300-014-02 Parcel 10-02400-013-28 Bridle Ridge 2nd Addition, Outlot F (10-14997-063-00) In addition, the following properties will also be in the construction area but are not proposed to be assessed: Lots 5 & 6, Block 4 - Oaks of Bridgewater 1st Addition Lots 1-6, Block 14 - Bridle Ridge 1st Addition Lots 1-8, Block 15 - Bridle Ridge 1st Addition Outlot C - Oaks of Bridgewater 2nd Addition Outlot E - Bridle Ridge 2nd Addition Outlot A - Bridle Ridge 1st Addition ASSESSMENTS Assessments are proposed to be levied against the benefited property. A preliminary assessment roll is included at the back of this report in Appendix B. All lateral assessment costs will be revised based on final costs. A. Sanitary Sewer: It is proposed to assess the total cost of sanitary sewer equally to each lot in The Oaks of Bridgewater 2nd Addition. Trunk area sanitary sewer was previously assessed under Projects 494 and 498. 9. B. Water Main: It is proposed to assess the total cost of water main equally to each lot in The Oaks of Bridgewater 2nd Addition. Trunk area water main was previously assessed under Projects 494 and 498. C. Services: It is proposed to assess the total cost of sanitary sewer and water service equally to each lot in The Oaks of Bridgewater 2nd Addition. D. Storm Sewer: It is proposed to assess the cost of lateral storm sewer equally to all lots within The Oaks of Bridgewater 2nd Addition. Trunk area storm sewer was previously assessed under projects 494 and 498. E. Street: It is proposed to assess the total cost of street equally to each lot in The Oaks of Bridgewater 2nd Addition. REVENUE SOURCES: Revenue sources to cover the cost of this project are as follows: Project Cost Revenue Balance A. SANITARY SEWER Lateral $118,350 Lateral Assessment $118,350 TOTAL $118,350 $118,350 - 0 - B. WATER MAIN Lateral $ 59,500 Lateral Assessment $ 59,500 TOTAL $ 59,500 $ 59,500 - 0 - C. SERVICES Lateral $ 37,600 Lateral Assessment $ 37,600 TOTAL $ 37,600 $ 37,600 - 0 - 10. 3� D. STORM SEWER Lateral $150,800 Lateral Assessment $150,800 TOTAL $150,800 $150,800 - 0 - E. STREET Lateral $149,000 Lateral Assessment $149,000 TOTAL $149,000 $149,000 - 0 - Ai prL po,ed project costs will be assessed to the developer. No money will be required from the City's utility or street funds. PROJECT SCHEDULE Pres rii a_i illlity Report April 2, 1991 Public Hering May 7, 1991 Approve,. Plans and Specifications May 7, 1991 Open Bids/Award Contract June 4, 1991 Complete Construction August 1, 1991 Assessment Hearing Spring, 1992 First Payment Due with Real Estate Taxes May, 1993 11. APPENDIX A PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE THE OAKS OF BRIDGEWATER 2ND ADDITION STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT NO. 610 A. SANITA.PY SEWER 8" PVC SDR35 sanitary sewer, 0'-14' dp. @ $12.50/11 $ 18,625 760 Lin.ft, 8" PVC SDR35 sanitary sewer, 14'-20' dp. @ $15.00/1.f. 11,400 600 Lin.ft. 8" PVC SDR26 sanitary sewer, 20'-26' dp. @ $28.00/Lf. 16,800 150 Lin.ft. 8" DIP sanitary sewer, 26'-30' dp. @ $40.00/l.f. 6,000 2.0 Each Std. 4' dia. MH w/cstg. (q- $950.00/ca. 19,000 1.5,E Lin ft, MH depth greater than 8' dp. @ $65.00/each 10,075 Each Connect 8'' PVC to existing MH @ $200.00/each 200 32.7 Unit. Outside drop $175.00,11 5,730 34 Each 8"x4" v ye in pl. @ $50.00/ea. 1,700 51.E Cu yds. Rock stabilization below pipe @ $10.00/cu.yd. 500 3.000 Lin.ft. Mechanical trench compaction @ $0.30/lin.ft. 900 4 Each Marker sign w/post @ $30.00/ea. 120 Subtotal $ 91,050 +30% Legal, Engrng., Admin. & Bond Interest 27.300 TOTAL SANITARY SEWER $118,350 12. '4)1 B. WATER MAIN 2,650 Limit. 6" DIP water main @ $12.00/11 $ 31,800 5 Each Hydrant @ $1,200.00/ea. 6,000 6 Each 6" Resilient wedge gate valve & box @ $450.00/ea. 2,700 1 Each 12"x 6" wet tap w/box @ $1,000.00/ea. 1,000 2,400 Lbs. Fittings @ $1.00/lb. 2,400 2 F... :1-) Connect 6" DIP to existing 6" DIP @ $500.00/ea. 1,000 10 c o suio iization below pipe @ $10.00%cu.yd. 100 ;650 1_1;1,:i, .1c°c1 a -ic-1l trench compaction @ $0.301.f. 800 Subtotal $ 45,800 +30% Legal, Engrng., Admin. & Bond Interest 13.700 1 O TAL x LR MAIN $ 59,500 C: SLTip. 6. 1,70: Li } {t. 4' PVC sL? �itary sewer serv. @' $7.00/i.f. $ 11,900 Li-._ . 4" C rise. @ $20.O0/l.f. 340 4 T-1:•:‘1-, Televise riser; $400.00/ea. 1,600 4 1 a.'11 Sewer cleanout @ $200.00/ea. 800 700 Lir._.t_ 1" '1wr "K" copper water service (a: 10,200 34 1" Corporation stop @ $35.00/ea. 1,190 34 Each 1" Curb stop @ $70.00/ea. 2,380 1,700 Lin ft. Mechanical trench compaction @ $0.30/1.f. 510 Subtotal $ 28,920 +30% Legal, Engrng., Admin. & Bond Interest 8.680 TOTAL SERVICES $ 37,600 13. D. STORM SEWER 280 Lin.ft. 12" RCP Cl. 5, 0'-10' dp. @ $18.00/1.f. . $ 5,040 1,220 Lin.ft. 15" RCP Cl. 5, 0'-10' dp. @ $20A0/Lf. 24,400 165 Lin.ft. 21" RCP Cl. 3, 0'-10' dp. @ $30.00/1.f. 4,950 150 Lin.ft. 24" RCP Cl. 4, 0'-10' dp. @ $32.00/11. 4,800 680 Lin.ft. 27" RCP Cl. 4, 0'-16' dp. @ $34.00/1.f. 23,120 390 Lin.f. . 30" RCP Cl. 5, 14'-20' dp. @ $45.00/11. 17,550 Std. 4' dia. MH or CBMLI w/cstg. @ $1,000.00/ea. 15,000 43 s_. .._.. AEI'-I depth greater than 8' dp. ia' $65.00.1.f. 2,795 Sid. CB w/cstg. $750.00/ea. 7,500 Outlet control .1-ucture @ $1,500.00/ea. 1,500 1 15" RCP flared ez-d ?: $500.Oo/ea 500 RCP flared enc $1,200,00/ea. 1,200 R p rap (a $?0 00 cu.vd. 2,100 ss B Pipe Bedding Q; S5.00/1.f. 785 Mechanical trench compaction () 50.30.1.f. 785 1 S t fence @ $2.001.f. 600 1.5 Ac- ,,'s Seeding w/mulch and fertilizer @ $800.00/ac. 1,200 III P S _``` Clearing & Grubbing @ $500.00/L.S. 500 6 L.dc2n Marker sign w/post $30.00/ea. 180 Subtotal $115,970 +30% Legal, Engrng., Admin. & Bond Interest 34,830 TOTAL STORM SEWER $150,800 E. STREET IMPROVEMENTS 700 Cu.yds. Subgrade correction @ $3.00/cu.yd. 2,100 500 Cu.yds. Select Granular borrow @ $6.00/cu.yd. 3,000 11,700 Sq.yds. Subgrade preparation @ $0.50/sq.yd. 5,850 4,100 Tons Cl. 5, Aggregate base, 100% crushed @ $7.00/ton 28,700 1,080 Ton 2331 Bit. base course @ $10.00/ton 10,800 5.4:9 Ten 2341 Bit. wear course @ $12.00/ton 6.480 or Bit. Mat'l. for mixture @ $180.00/ton 16,200 625 Crs. Bit. Mat'l. for tack coat @ $1.00/gal. 625 1201 S,Ty,`is. Concrete valley gutter @ $22.00/sq.yd. 2,640 6 i Lin.f t. Surmountable conc. C.& G. @ $4.25/1.f. 26,140 Reinforcing for conc. C. & G. @ $0.50/L£ 425 Si. 2" Bit. walk w/6" aggregate @ $1.00 sq.ft. 6,040 Structure adjustments @ $125.00/ea. 3,250 Storm sewer inlet projection C' $50.00;ea. 850 1.. s Seed w/3" topsoil, mulch & fertilizer @ $1,000.00/ac. 1,500 Subtotal • $114,600 +30% Legal, Engrng., Admin. & Bond Interest 34.400 TOTAL STREET IMPROVEMENTS $149,000 15. APPENDIX B PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL THE OAKS OF BRIDGEWATER 2ND ADDITION STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT NO. 610 Lateral Total Parcel Sanitary Water Storm Assessment Description Sewer Main Services Sewer Street Per Lot OAKS OF BRIDGEWATER 2ND ADDITION (34 Lots) Lots 1-15, Block 1 $3,481 $1,750 $1,106 $4,435 $4,382 $15,154 Lots 1-4, Block 2 3,481 1,750 1,106 4,435 4,382 15,154 Lots 1-15, Block 3 3 481 1,750 1,106 4,435 4,382 15,154 TOTAL $118,350 $59,500 $37,600 $150,800 $149,000 EXISTING PARCELS TOTAL ASSESSMENT Parcel 10-02300-013-02 (31/34 x $515,250) $469,780 Parcel 10-02300-014-02 (3/34 x $515,250) 45,470 TOTAL $515,250 16. L. U ' I N J.) 1 J'r I .d.., \ ...,A. 1 I I I I . N J ESCO7T ROA Pr � I 1 2 3 4 5 `:J' 6 PROPOSED 1 EADO TR. 1 , 1 SAN. SEWER ADD N ; PV 6 MH -s 2 fti QG MH-16 MH-17 H-18 3 8 - 10 9 7 `� MH-14 8 ©4 O 9 1 LT 10 i �� 0 r 5 W m5 ------- _ 2 'p A 12 { � �4 —13 13 ( Q 11 3 Q 14 6 it ifim MH-20 PAC o°' MH-1 1 (3 • 12 116 7 CZ 4MH—� 9 ` I Q N 8 c 8 7• G�c, 6® MH-9 N 8 5 MH-1 1 10 g \_ J Iw9 H-8 © 10 -�._�. 010-01 3 1a 2 10 5\iG Cp B/Q/AZ �� '0 11 MH- MHI43 2/Q/I �► 'D OUTLOT /1 4 9 8" DIP I ,E 200 400 13 I M 3 a 14 4 1 2el 3 Scale in feet 1ZMH-6 MH-12 PROPOSED �i LEA . . -wer SAN. SEWER I 4`0 , 4 OGr` I 1P6 6 S Oi. I MH-1 \ t; 7c‘‘. (es v Ex. M N: / 7 7 6 a. so SANITARY SEWER n Bonestroo se, Rosene 46, si In EAGAN, MINNESOTA FIGURE NO. 2 Anderiik b Associates THE OAKS OF BRIDGEWATER 2nd ADDITION Engineers a Architects 2335 West Highway 36 \49\49515\49515R02 APRIL 1991 COMM. 49515 St. Paul, Minnesota 55113 ( U I i i \1 I I JJ ' ' I JJ \ JL , / hl ' i —J �x. 12" Water Main `I w w--sd- €° w w w + ---- , WESCOTT ROAD —N--- x. 1 1TVaTet-ITam w w D4-w 3 4 5.1? I ., c2), .1 1 [,./1 ,1 6 PROPOSED MEADOW WATER MAIN HID 0EN j6 6" 1 2 J � _ 3 8 1 "5'` 10 9 3 'Ltj 9 1 ...p 8 4 O cc :00 d e 10 04 0 ce 12O 5W � 5 'per Q � [L 11 k il 2 14 6 12 00 115 ,p b CO i► 8 8 3 6O 1 \w—D 9 ��ill , to 15C15) I 010-01 GF1� 10 1-----4-----":"-----6r. WM,w� _ . 4 2 1 4 OUTLOT 0 0 200 400 e PROPOSED 13 3 Scale in feet WATE' MAIN 14 15 ® 1 2 3 12 .......■. I_j 11 LL RUN PT 4 r( OG OJ. � 6 WATER MAIN ki Bonestroo Rosene le EAGAN, MINNESOTA FIGURE NO. 3 11 Assoct t s THE OAKS OF BRIDGEWATER 2nd ADDITION Engineers & Architects 2335 West Highway 36 \49\49515\49515R03 APRIL 1991 COMM. 49515 St. Paw, Minnesota 55113 } 2Y a---18. 36"30„ 3071 -441E3=7—ROAD k 3a' --130' 4 Ail. .o 1 7 - :lot 11111 ~2 NPONLDgJ7P 19 ,� -, HWL=882 j 7 3 8 V :`: � I tt .1 f I •■ 4 9 'AO 12 5 "C_,,,,,s41,41 .. _. DRAINAGE �1 12 BOUNDARIES fv" O litio, NIL :6 1116 'St Ale 7.41r -0 -- (1)8 7 8 5 ck 15 6 �Q 9 il BA)s3 9 �J� I 1 ' i 010-01 I (� viz�o orm awe f` �Cs�pt?D DRAINAGE KE BOUNDARIES 100 ' D 14 AL e � 4 POND JP-20 e '"� iic NWL-855.6 14 ® 3 HWL= 15 Ut .13 ■ 0 200 400 5 Scale in feet NWL=841.0 I%) STORAGE VOL.=4.6 Ac.Ft. (.) Off, CANT. 1 6 /WET VOLUME=2.6 Ac.Ft. l0� STRU. Le C/• OUTLOT D I.. F 16�`V � /�` 17 I 1 12" g St �4 10 11 5 AtVir, 1 ■r 1 g, .--- 11 19 ■ STORM SEWER n Bonestroo 0 Aosene il Anderlik 6 EAGAN, MINNESOTA FIGURE NO. 4 Associates THE OAKS OF BRIDGEWATER 2nd ADDITION Ergn..r. & Architects 2335 West Highway 36 49\49515\49515R04 APRIL 1991 COMM. 49515 Sf. Paul, Minnesota 55113 ; ; JO / ' 1 J.) \ l / 1j jI 1 1 1 ■ 1 -% iii! - ix. 8618 CONC. C do G 52' F-F aVES+✓+�TF- 4D , i- Is5 1 I' ,1 2 3 4 1 1 i 1 6 5 ROPO.ED S -EET� DO TR' 1 1 .� 11 \>HIDP TAPER 0 I. •' _ 7 0, M I6 1 2 W 2 O ; I I I 8 I k3 10 9 l� 3 9 Z 1 O �4 � � 4 � . it O 12 5LJ � 5 10 ROPOSED 28' F-Fl STREETS W URMOUNTABLEI CONC. '�C 11 L 3 URB & GUTTE-. 6 W O 6 13 14 115■ 7�CD e7 11 10 4� • I 8 8 8 5 I ;i 18 9 19 P*p ' © a ' r► 10 0 t 0 2 `. �0/Q r 0 20 c`EX• '` :' D' i 2 & oUnt., s 111111 11 I s� 1�G ?: 12 O 1 3 16 14 15 1 r ,`V/:., BIT. N if M TRA . • A. O 6 6 14 1 1 s�° Cil4OT 3 2 ��//'' F 4 0 200 400 Q. 7 6 6 �' •'�'� � o PROPOSED 8'x750' BITUMINOUS TRAIL Scale in feet ,` FOR SANITARY SEWER MH ACCESS. STREETS 0 Bonestroo Rosene • In AnderHk & EAGAN, MINNESOTA FIGURE NO. 5 Associates THE OAKS OF BRIDGEWATER 2nd ADDITION Engineers & Architects 2335 West Highway 36 \49\49515\49515R05 APRIL 1991 COMM. 49515 St. Paul, Minnesota 55113 Ws 1 r O 9 f 10 N I 35 / 34 133 \ 32 / I I L2 � 4. i 1 (i) i .10 ivy �tJ $ ' � 2 10 Li_j �, O 10 1� 5W m5 .2.A 6 S� 1 1 14 . ` 15� , � ---�--� 1, 2 • a o 8 8 4 1 3 8 N 6� 010-01 cr • ‘x# ilio �o 9 F1�D C) to 4 ' OUTLOT 4 B 0 200 400 . 1 AC)/ 3# 1 2 3 Scale in feet 15 P AMP L . 5 4 O�� 6 6 0)- � 6 PROPOSED ASSESSMENT AREA Bonestroo Rosene EAGAN, MINNESOTA FIGURE NO. 6 As 6 Associates THE OAKS OF BRIDGEWATER 2nd ADDITION Engineers & Architects 2335 West Highway 38 \49\49515\49515R06 APRIL 1991 COMM. 49515 St. Paul, Minnesota 55113 a Agenda Information Memo May 7, 1991 City Council Meeting PROJ. 589R. ELRENE RD B. Project 589R, Elrene Road (Streets and Storm Sewers)--On April 2nd, the Council received a revised feasibility report for the above-referenced project and scheduled a new public hearing to be held on May 7th. Enclosed on pages ■57 through 96--is a copy of that revised feasibility report. On July 17, 1990, the City Council closed the public hearing and formally approved Project 589 which provided for the reconstruction of portions of Trails End Road (formerly Kost Road) and Elrene Road along with the installation of additional storm sewer facilities and revisions to existing utilities as necessary to service the adjacent property and related developments. In November of 1990, formal bids were received for this project but, due to the fact that the bids received exceeded the estimate contained in the feasibility report by more than 10%, the bids were rejected and the contract canceled with consideration being given for readvertisement during the spring of 1991. Subsequent to that action, the final plat for the Woodlands North and Wescott Square Additions were approved which required some of the utilities that were to be installed under original Project 589. Subsequently, these developments elected to install a portion of these improvements privately as necessary to service their development rather than being delayed into the spring of 1991 for final plat approval. As a result, the scope of the original project has changed. Subsequently, it was appropriate to revise the original feasibility report to reflect these changes in the original scope and to allow the City an opportunity to revise the quantities and estimated unit prices before resoliciting new bids. The easements necessary for this project have been committed to through the final plat contract agreements for the Woodlands North, Wescott Square and West Publishing Additions. However, since that time, West Publishing has expressed concerns and reservations regarding their projected financial participation and easement dedication requirements. Enclosed on pages 94 and � is a letter received from the attorney representing West Publishing regarding their objEctions to this improvement. Mr. Mark Hanson of the City's consulting engineering firm and the Director of Public Works will present information pertaining to the details of this project as well as respond to the concerns of the affected property owners and any questions that my rise from this public hearing. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To close the public hearing and approve/deny Project 589R, Elrene Road (Streets and Utilities) and, if approved, authorize the preparation of detailed plans and specifications. • • f < < ' . ) .`i Report for Elrene Road M.S.A.P 195-123-02 and Trails End Road Utility and Street Improvements Project No. 589R Eagan, Minnesota April, 1991 File No. 49504 ELRENE ROAD AND TRAILS END ROAD UTILITY AND STREET IMPROVEMENTS EAGAN, MINNESOTA PROJECT NO. 589 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page No. LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL 1. SCOPE 2. FEASIBILITY AND RECOMMENDATION 2. FIGURE 1 - LOCATION PLAN 3. DISCUSSION 4. STREET 4. STORM SEWER 5. SANITARY SEWER 6. WATER MAIN 7. SERVICES 7. RIGHT-OF-WAY/EASEMENT/PERMITS 7. COST ESTIMATE 9. AREA TO BE INCLUDED 10. ASSESSMENTS 11. STREET 11. STORM SEWER 12. SANITARY SEWER 14. WATER MAIN 14. REVENUE 15. PROJECT SCHEDULE 16. APPENDIX A - PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATES APPENDIX B - PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL FIGURE 2, 2A. 2B, 2C - STREET & STREET ASSESSMENT LENGTHS FIGURE 3 & 3A- STORM SEWER &TRUNK STORM SEWER ASSESSMENTS FIGURE 4 - SANITARY SEWER • FIGURE 5 - WATER MAIN 49504.RP2 �� //J, Otto G.Bonestroo.PE, Keith A.Gordon,P.E. Kenneth P Anderson,PE. Miles B.Jensen,PE. Bonestroo ro® Robert W Rosene,PE Richard W Foster,P.E. . Mark R Roifs,PE. L.Phillip Gravel III,PE. / V 4 Joseph C.Anderlik.PE. Donald C.Burgardt,P.E. Robert C.Russek,A.I.A. Rene C.Plumart,A.I.A. R�q Marvin L.Sorvala,P.E. Jerry A.Bourdon,PE. Thomas E.Angus,RE. Agnes M.Ring,A.I,C.P VSene Richard E.Turner,P.E. Mark A.Hanson,PE. Howard A.Sanford,P.E. Jerry D.Pertzsch,P.E. S ' Andertife Glenn R Cook.PE Ted K.Field,P,E. Daniel J.Edgerton.P.E. Cecilio Olivier,P.E. Thomas E Noyes.PE. Michael 7 Rautmann,PE. Mark A.Seip,P,E, Robert R.Dreblow PE. 11 Robert G.Schunichc PE. Robert R.Pfeffene,RE, Philip J.Caswell,P.E. Gary W Morien,P.E. Associates Susan M Eberlin,C.P.A. David O.Loskota,PE, Ismael Martinez.P.E. Charles A.Erickson Thomas W Peterson,PE. Mark D.Wallis,P.E. Leo M.Pawelsky Michael C.Lynch,P.E. Thomas R.Anderson,A,LA. Harlan M.Olson Engineers & Architects James R.Maland,P,E. Gary F.Rylander,P,E. April 16, 1991 Honorable Mayor and City Council City of Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55122 Re: Elrene Road and Trails End Road Street and Utility Improvements Project No. 589R Our File No. 49504 Dear Mayor and Council: Attached is our report for Elrene Road and Trails End Road Street and Utility Improvements, Project No. 5898. The report prese;:t.s and discusses the proposed utility and street construction/improvements for Elrene Road from Wescott Road to Yankee Doodle Road and for Trails End Road west of Elrene Road. Also included in the report are cost estimates and a preliminary assessment roll. We will be pleased to meet with the Council and other interested parties at a mutually convenient time to discuss this report. Yours very truly, BONES 00, DOSE? , ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES, INC. 4 r otiv_fg:,_,,.„,_,_____-- Mark A. Hanson MAH:lk I hereby certify that this report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Register,d Professional Engineer under the laws of Stape o innesota. Mark A. Hanson ,/n/ ( 0 14- 4 i at- : April 16, 1991 Reg. No. 14260 Approved b i RPT49504 2335 West Highway 36 • St. Paul, Minnesota 55113 • 612-636-4600 ELRENE ROAD AND TRAILS END ROAD UTILITY AND STREET IMPROVEMENTS EAGAN, MINNESOTA PROJECT' NO. 589R SCOPE: This project provides for the upgrading of Elrene Road (from Wescott Road to Yankee Doodle Road) and Trails End Road. The location of the project is shown in Figure No. 1. The upgrading of Elrene Road consists of widening the existing 24' wide rural roadway to a 36' wide urban roadway. The new 36' section will connect to the existing 44' wide roadway to the south between Wescott Road and Windtree Drive. A bituminous trail is proposed to be constructed on the east side of Elrene Road in accordance with the City's Master Trail Plan. The upgrading of Trails End Road consists of regrading the existing rural gravel roadway and constructing a 32' wide bituminous urban roadway. Upgrading both roads will also include utility construction. The proposed upgrading of each roadway is due to the development of Wescott Square and The Woodlands North development. FEASIBILITY AND RECOMMENDATION: The project is feasible from an engineering standpoint and is in accordance with street reconstruction policies in the City of Eagan. The project as outlined herein can best be carried out as one contract. Elrene Road is designated as a Municipal State Aid Street in the City of Eagan. Therefore, the plans must be prepared in accordance with Municipal State Aid Standards and be submitted to the State Aid Office for their review and approval. The recommended 36'wide street width for Elrene Road requires parking restrictions on both sides. The existing average daily traffic 2 49504.RP2 e ■ Cc 0 (r) Begin Reconstruction ; , i I ...• .... i ( > ; 1 + .■■■■ l''"' 1 i L'I ■ 1 1 I 1 :01 1,. , YANKEE DOOPLERDAD 1 I 3 1 , 3 .. : :` .;,.., i .,--':- 3 1 1 i. ' ' '' ''', • . ,x. 0 ROAD I I . . 1 i 1 I End Cqnstruction ---- Begin Construction , . I ....... ; L.:.'..4., ••■•■•• ' \ 1 0 \ I ! QI '4 ',', cr■ ‘, , g 0• 1 ; ?,- — yaSte0.- —I--L.- ' 11*——•,=- r--- I I- - ' ' ,' '' • ' 1 OSs\ ' End Reconstruction f..f>1 • \ E , • ' - , . , : .. : i ' „ 3gin Overlay ii , ' , ' • '. K ,:. : ,,,L ' \ - . • - ...,, ,2.. III L CV- 1 . . .. to -": ‘'• , ' 1 " : ' ": '' ' ::-- '44.: ,= '„ 'A- l.-, 0—. . , , , ., I , 'c-. ',-. ''... 0/ 4 . . , '• '-:,..'....: .,,:.,..., l- 1 1,1 .. . 1 tWOO { , , -1 N i ..._ WESCO7T ROAD End Over-lby • ILL ; •, ; 4,,k, , .. 0 1000 2000 Si 1..,,,, .,--.›,r; i'=„:,..,‘.: :-...-v• -,-.1 ',•; I .. ....--:---moinguim-----i i ..IDG: 1, 1 ... nil . •,. / I/ l' eivi. V • • • • Scale in feet J Engineers &Architects Elrene and Trails End Road 4i °° Rosana 11:111 Location Plan Anderlik & Vill Associates City Project No. 589R St. Pau& Minnesota _I Eagan, Minnesota Date: MAY 1990 ,..<5' Comm. 49504 [ Fig. No. 1 .. i count (1989 ADT) for this section of Elrene Road is 1570. The projected ADT for the year 2010 is 3570. DISCUSSION: Street - The proposed street construction under this project can be separated into three sections. Trails End Road - 32' wide residential roadway. (See Figure 2 & 2a) Elrene Road (north Portion) - 36' wide roadway upgrade. (See Figure 2 & 2A) Elrene Road (south portion) - 44' wide mill and overlay. (See Figure 2C) The first section, Trails End Road, consists of upgrading the existing gravel road to a 32' wide residential roadway. As part of the proposed construction, street entrances for the proposed developments north and south of Trails End Road (Wescott Square and The Woodlands North Addition) will be provided. The intersection of Trails End Road and Ivy Lane will also be completed. Lots abutting Trails End Road in the Woodlands North will have direct driveway access. However, it's anticipated the driveway locations can be determined before construction. Therefore, it's proposed to install B618 concrete curb and gutter on Trails End Road. The second street section, Elrene Road consists of upgrading Elrene Road between the north edge of the Windtree Additions and Yankee Doodle Road. The existing roadway in this section is a 22' wide bituminous surface. It is proposed to upgrade the roadway to a 36' wide surface to connect to the existing urban road section at Windtree Drive. The present roadway was constructed in 1974. At that time, the gravel base for the roadway was constructed to a width of 40'. This project will utilize the existing 40'wide gravel base where possible. However, part of the proposed project will require regrading the roadway to meet 49504.RP2 4 9-4 sight distance requirements near Trails End Road. The proposed Elrene Road design section is: 1" 2361 Bituminous Wear (to be placed in 1992) 1-1/2' 2341 Bituminous Binder 2-1/2" 2331 Bituminous Base 6" Class 5 Aggregate Base (existing) 9" Class 3 Aggregate Base (existing) It is proposed to construct B624 (non-surmountable) concrete curb and gutter along Elrene Road. Also included is an 8' wide bituminous trail located along the east side of Elrene Road constructed within the existing right-of-way in accordance with the City's Master Trail Plan. The final street section, Elrene Road overlay, consists of milling and overlaying the existing 44' wide roadway between Wescott Road and 200' north of Windtree Drive (see Figure 2C). The existing surface in this section does not meet State Aid design standards for the projected traffic counts of the roadway. The proposed 1-1/2" overlay will add enough granular equivalency to the existing section to meet State Aid standards. It is also proposed to construct valley gutters and repair broken concrete curb and gutter and street settlements as required. Storm Sewer - Storm sewer is proposed to be constructed to convey runoff from streets and adjacent areas. The construction will include catch basins, manholes, and storm sewer outlets for the adjacent ponding areas. The proposed storm sewer will provide an outlet from Pond JP-33.1 to Pond JP-14 (see Figure 3). The proposed storm sewer consists of lateral and trunk. The lateral storm sewer will collect surface drainage from Trails End Road, Elrene Road, and the abutting drainage 49504.RP2 5g7 NNW areas and discharge into Pond JP-33.1,the existing storm sewer to Pond JP-14 or the existing 33" storm sewer located west of Ivy Lane near Trails End Road. The lateral storm sewer drainage area is shown on Figure No. 3. Trunk storm sewer as part of this project consists of a 12" diameter outlet pipe from Pond JP-33.1 connecting to the storm sewer pipe to Pond JP-14. The inlet pipe to Pond JP- 14 was constructed as part of the West Publishing 3rd Addition, Project No. 585( Design considerations for Pond JP-33.1 assume only the direct runoff from Wescott Square. The Woodlands North, Elrene Road, Trails End Road, and an undeveloped portion of West Publishing. In the future when West Publishing develops further, additional ponding (Pond JP-33.2) will have to be provided. The wet volume requirements for Pond JP-33.1 assumes only the developed portions of Wescott Square and The Woodlands North. It is proposed that Pond JP33.1 be developed and graded as part of this project. Pond JP33.1 is located within the 150' wide protected green area designated by West Publishing on their property. Listed below are the requirements for Pond JP-33.1 and the future requirements for Pond JP33.2. Pond Storage Wet Volume Direct Drainage Designation NWL HWL (Ac. Ft.) (Ac. Ft.) (area acres) Pond JP-33.1 872 878 2.3 0.73 25.9 Pond JP-33.2 874 880 15.0 7.6 53.7 Sanitary Sewer - Presently sanitary sewer exists in both Trails End Road and Elrene Road. As part of this project, it is proposed to provide sanitary sewer stubs for the proposed developments along Trails End Road and the proposed Woodlands North cul-de-sacs on 49504.RP2 6 61 Elrene Road. It is also proposed to extend sanitary sewer in Trails End Road westerly from Ivy Lane as shown in Figure No. 3. Water Main - As part of this project, it is proposed to construct water main in Trails End Road. The proposed water main will connect to existing water main at Elrene Road and Ivy Lane. Water main stubs and hydrants will also be provided for the proposed developments along Trails End Road and the proposed cul-de-sacs on Elrene Road shown on Figure No. 5. It is also proposed to construct a 16" trunk water main stub to the west from Elrene Road, consistent with the City's Comprehensive Water Distribution Plan. The location of the 16" stub is also shown on Figure No. 5. Services: Service extensions are proposed to Lot 2 Block 1 Wescott Garden Lots (Trails End Road) in accordance with the approved Woodlands North Development. RIGHT-OF-WAY/EASEMENTS/PERMITS: Sufficient right-of-way exists to construct both Elrene and Trails End Road and the bituminous trail along the east side of Elrene Road. Also, temporary slope easements will be needed along both roadways. A permanent street easement is required for Trails End Road as it curves south, west of Ivy Lane. This easement will be necessary to provide a 20 MPH street curve at that location. A permanent utility easement will be required for storm sewer discharging into and out of Pond JP-33.1. In addition, a ponding easement is required for Pond JP-33.1. A storm sewer easement is also required to connect the proposed storm sewer to the existing storm sewer at the west end of Trails End Road. Listed below are the parcels requiring permanent easements: 49504.RP2 769 • • Parcel Description Easement Type Estimated Area WESCOTT GARDEN LOTS Lot 2, Block 1 Street 2,800 ft2 WESCOTT HILLS THIRD ADDITION Lot 14, 15 Block 1 Storm Sewer 600 ft2 NW 3/4, SECTION 13 West Publishing 4th Addition Outlot B Storm Sewer & Pond 48,750 ft2 A permit is required from the Minnesota Department of Health for all water main construction. A permit is also required from Dakota County for the connection of Elrene Road at Yankee Doodle Road. 49504.RP2 84, I COST ESTIMATE: Detailed cost estimates are presented at the back of this report in Appendix A. A summary of these costs are as follows: I. STREET IMPROVEMENTS a) Trails End Road $151,340 b) Elrene Road (North Section) 434,560 c) Elrene Road Overlay (South Section) 78,090 d) Elrene Road Bituminous Trail 33,380 II. STORM SEWER a) Trunk 109,990 b) Lateral 216,660 III. SANITARY SEWER a) Trails End Road 93,730 b) Elrene Road (Lateral) 25,350 IV. WATER MAIN a) Trails End Road 66,460 b) Elrene Road (Lateral) 36,050 c) Elrene Road (Trunk) 9,700 V. SERVICE a) Trails End Road 11.230 Total $1,266,540 The total estimated project cost as outlined herein including contingencies and all related overhead is $1,266,540. Overhead costs are estimated at 30% and include legal, engineering, administration and bond interest. 49504.RP2 9 AREA TO BE INCLUDED: Listed below are the parcels proposed to be assessed: NW Va SECTION 13 West Publishing 4th Addition Lot 1 Block 2 Outlot B Outlot C NE 1/4 SECTION 14 Parcel 013-01 WESCOTT GARDEN LOTS Lot 2 Block 1 Part of Lot 1 Block 4 (Parcel 012-04) WESCOTT SQUARE Outlot G Lots 1-18 Block 2 WESCOTT HILLS REVISED 2ND ADDITION Lot 1,2 Block 2 WESCOTT HILLS REVISED 3RD ADDITION Lots 15, 16, 17 Block 1 THE WOODLANDS NORTH Outlot A, B, C, D Lots 1-5 Block 1 Lots 1-8 Block 2 Lots 1-16 Block 3 Lots 1-10 Block 4 SOUTH HILLS FIRST ADDITION Lots 1,9 Block 2 Listed below is property abutting the overlay portion of Elrene Road that is not proposed to be assessed (construction area): 49504.RP2 10 43a, Platted Property Windtree Addition Lots 1, 4, 5, & 14; Block 1 Windtree 3rd Addition Lot 1; Block 1 Lots 1, 8, 9, & 10; Block 3 Windtree 5th Addition Lots 10 & 11; Block 1 Windtree 7th Addition Lots 1-4; Block 1 South Hills First Addition Lots 10 & 11; Block 2 Listed below is property abutting Trails End Road that is not proposed to be assessed but adjacent to the construction: NE V4 SECTION 14 Parcel 011-02 WESCOTT HILLS REVISED 3RD ADDITION Lot 14, Block 1 ASSESSMENTS: Assessments are proposed to be levied against the benefited properties in accordance with assessment policies established in the City of Eagan. A preliminary assessment roll is included in Appendix B (attached). Assessments will be spread over a 10 year period at an interest rate determined at the time of the bond sale. The proposed assessments are separated into street (Elrene and Trails End Road), storm sewer (lateral and trunk), sanitary sewer (Elrene and Trails End Road), water main (Elrene and Trails End Road), and services. It is not proposed to assess the cost for the bituminous trail along the east side of Elrene Road. It's cost will be financed by the City's Park Trail Dedication Fund. Street Assessments - Street is proposed to be assessed on a front foot basis to the adjacent properties. Street assessments for this project fall into three sections: Trails End Road, the north portion of Elrene Road (upgrade), and the south portion of Elrene Road (overlay). It is proposed to assess each street section on a front foot basis to the adjacent properties 49504.RP2 11 in accordance with Eagan's Assessment Policy. The assessment rate for the Elrene Road Overlay is determined by dividing the estimated cost of an equivalent 32' wide residential street by the total front footage. Two lots in South Hills First Addition which take direct access to Elrene Road are proposed to be assessed one-half of this rate in accordance with the City's Policy for assessing bituminous overlay construction. The residential rate for Trails End Road was determined by dividing the total project cost for Trails End Road by the total assessable front footage. The full rate for Elrene Road was determined by dividing the total project cost for Elrene Road by the total front footage excluding Trails End Road right-of-way. The residential equivalent rate for Elrene Road is assumed to be the same residential rate for Trails End Road. The residential lots in The Woodlands North Development which abut Elrene Road and do not have direct driveway access to Elrene Road are not proposed to be assessed in accordance with Eagan's Assessment Policy. Front Estimated Footage Cost Rate Trails End Road 2,369.32 $151,340 $63.87/F.F. Residential Elrene Road (Upgrade) 6,116.16 $434,560 $71.05/F.F. Full Elrene Road (Overlay) 4,340 $ 78,090 $ 6.54/F.F. *Residential Equivalent * Rate equals = 32'/44' ($78,090) = $56,790; Rate/F.F. ($56,790 + 4,340/F.F.) 0.5 = $6.54 Storm Sewer Assessments -Storm sewer proposed herein is lateral and trunk. Lateral storm sewer is to be assessed on a square foot basis to the properties which drain to, or benefit from, the storm sewer construction as part of this project. The lateral assessment rate per 49504.RP2 12 ,//, square foot is determined by taking the total lateral storm sewer cost divided by the total drainage area including street right-of-way. The rate per square foot is separated into commercial, multiple, and residential rates based on the percentage difference for the 1991 Trunk Area Storm Sewer Rates which are listed below. The estimated lateral storm sewer cost (to be assessed by drainage area) is $216,660. 1991 TRUNK STORM SEWER RATES Commercial/Industrial 0.102/ft2 Multiple 0.085/ft2 Residential 0.068/ft Listed below are the drainage areas used for determining each lateral rate including street right-of-way. It is assumed for purposes of this report that the runoff rate for street right-of-way is equal to commercial property. Area (sq.ft.) Rate per sq.ft. Street R.O.W. 301,500 $0.148 Commercial 542,400 0.148 Multiple (0.8333 Comm.) 205,180 0.123 Residential (0.6666 Comm.) 672,970 0.099 Final lateral storm sewer assessment rates will be determined by using the actual storm sewer costs. The final lateral costs along with the areas and percentages above can be used to determine the final rate. 49504.RP2 13 �S�- ' It is proposed to assess trunk storm sewer to the benefited properties east of Elrene Road which have not been assessed. The area to be assessed trunk storm sewer is shown on Figure 3A and is proposed to be assessed at the commercial rate. Sanitary Sewer Assessments - Sanitary sewer proposed herein is lateral and is to be assessed totally to the benefited properties. All sanitary sewer in Tails End Road between Elrene Road and West of Ivy Lane is to be assessed to the assessable property along Trails End Road on a front foot basis. The sanitary sewer services in Elrene Road are proposed to be assessed to the benefited property they serve. Preliminary assessments are presented in Appendix B. Final assessments will be based on final construction costs. Water Main Assessments - Water main proposed herein is lateral and is to be assessed to the benefiting properties. Water main in Trails End Road will be assessed to abutting properties on a front foot basis. Water Services in Elrene Road are proposed to be assessed to the benefitting property they serve. Final assessments will be based on final construction costs. Service Assessments - Services proposed herein are to serve the future Woodlands North Development included in Lot 2 Flock 1 Wescott Garden Lots. Therefore, their cost is propose to be assessed entirely to this lot. • 49504.RP2 14 a REVENUE: Revenue sources to cover the cost of this project are listed below: PROJECT REVENUE BALANCE STREET COST (ASSESSMENT) (Deficit) Trails End Road $151,340 $151,340 $ - 0 - Elrene Road (North Section) 434,560 323,875 (110,685) Elrene Road Overlay (South Section) 78,090 2,641 (75,449) Elrene Road Bituminous Trail 33,380 (33,380) $697,370 $477,856 ($219,514) STORM SEWER Lateral $216,660 172,136 (44,524) Trunk 109,990 . 152,695 +42,705 $326,650 $324,831 ($1,819) SANITARY SEWER Trails End Road $93,730 93,730 - 0 - Elrene Road 25.350 25,530 - 0 - $119,080 $119,080 0 WATER MAIN Trails End Road $66,460 66,460 - 0 - Elrene Road 36,050 36,050 - 0 - Elrene Road Trunk 9.700 - (9700) $112,210 $102,510 ($9,700) SERVICE Service $11,230 $11,230 - 0 - TOTAL ($231,033) The estimated project deficit is $231,033 which will be the responsibility of the respective major improvement funds. 49504.RP2 15 47 PROJECT SCHEDULE Present Feasibility Report April 2, 1991 • Public Hearing May 7, 1991 Approve Plans and Specifications May 21, 1991 Open Bids/Award Contract June 18, 1991 Substantial Completion of Construction September, 1991 Complete Construction June, 1992 Assessment Hearing August, 1992 First Payment Due with Real Estate Taxes May, 1993 49504.RP2 16 6,g' APPENDIX A PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE ELRENE ROAD AND TRAILS END ROAD • PROJECT NO. 589R I. STREET IMPROVEMENTS Unit Total A. TRAILS END ROAD Unit Price Quantity Cost Clearing & grubbing L.S. $4,000.00 1 $ 4,000 Common excavation C.Y. 3.00 8,800 26,400 Subbase preparation S.Y. 1.00 3,050 3,050 Subgrade preparation S.Y, 1.00 6,470 6,470 100% crushed CL 5 aggregate Ton 7.00 2,800 19,600 Concrete curb & gutter L.F. 5.00 2,900 14,500 Concrete valley gutter S.Y. 22.00 250 5,500 Bituminous base course Ton 11.00 660 7,260 Bituminous wear course Ton 13.00 330 4,290 Bituminous mat. for mixture Ton 155.00 . 56 8,680 Bituminous mat. for tack Gal. 1.00 380 380 Adjust manhole Ea. 150.00 7 1,050 Adjust gate valve & box Ea. 100.00 7 700 Storm sewer inlet protection Ea. 50.00 12 600 Topsoil borrow C.Y. 8.00 500 4,000 Silt fence L.F. 2.00 50 100 Sod S.Y. 2.00 800 1,600 Seed w/mulch & fertilizer Ac. 900.00 3 2,700 Total $110,880 +5% Contingencies 5.540 $116,420 +30% Legal, Engr., Admin. & Bond Interest 34,920 TOTAL TRAILS END ROAD $151,340 49504.rpt A-1 / B. ELRENE ROAD WITH CURB (North Sections Unit Total Unit Edge Quantity Cost Traffic control L.S. $8,800.00 1 $8,800 Remove bituminous surface S.Y. 1.00 10,000 10,000 Clearing & grubbing L.S. 8,000.00 1 8,000 Common excavation C.Y. 2.50 16,500 41,250 Subgrade excavation C.Y. 2.50 1,000 2,500 100% crushed Cl. 5 aggr. Ton 7.00 5,500 38,500 B624 conc. curb & gutter L.F. 6.00 6,800 40,800 Concrete valley gutter S.Y. 22.00 130 1,320 Bituminous base course Ton 12.00 2,050 24,600 Bituminous binder course Ton 13.00 1,230 15,990 Bituminous wear course Ton 20.00 820 16,400 Bituminous mat. for mixture Ton 155.00 230 35,650 Bituminous mat. for tack coat Gal. 1.00 . 1,400 1,400 Adjust manhole & catch basin Ea. 150.00 23 3,450 Adjust gate valve & box Ea. 100.00 10 1,000 Pavement striping L.S. 5,000.00 1 5,000 Street Lights L.S. 1,200.00 1 1,200 Storm sewer inlet protection Ea. 50.00 24 1,200 Topsoil borrow C.Y. 8.00 4,500 36,000 Silt fence L.F. 1.00 1,500 1,500 Sod S.Y. 2.00 8,900 17,800 Seeding w/mulch & fertilizer Ac. 1,000.00 4 4,000 Relocate civil defense L.S. 2,000.00 1 2.000 Total $318,360 +5% Contingencies 15.920 $334,280 +30% Legal, Engr., Admin. & Bond Interest 100.280 TOTAL ELRENE ROAD WITH CURB (North Section) $434,560 49504.rpt A-2 70 C. ELRENE ROAD OVER LAY (South section) Unit Total Unit Er. .ce Quantity Cat Remove existing bituminous S.Y. $1.50 240 $360 Remove existing conc. curb L.F. 3.00 870 2,610 Concrete valley gutter S.Y. 22.00 190 4,180 100% Crushed Cl. 5 aggr._base Ton 7.00 100 700 6" Thick bituminous patch S.Y. 20.00 240 4,800 Mill Ex. bituminous S.Y. 1.50 6,900 10,350 Adjust manhole Ea. 150.00 12 1,800 Adjust gate valve Ea. 100.00 4 400 B618 Concrete curb L.F. 5.00 510 2,550 Bituminous wear course Ton 20.00 850 17,000 Bituminous mat. for mixture Ton 175.00 50 8,750 Bituminous mat. for tack Gal. 1.00 350 350 Pavement striping L.S. 2,000.00 1 2,000 Remove & replace bit. walk S.F. 2.00 640 1,280 Sod S.Y. 2.00 40 80 Total $57,210 +5% Contingencies 2.860 $60,070 +30% Legal, Engr., Admin. & Bond Interest 18,020 TOTAL ELRENE ROAD OVERLAY $78,090 7/ 49504.rpt A-3 D. ELRENE ROAD BITUMINOUS TRAIL Unit Total Unit Prigs. Quantity Cost 100% Crushed Cl. 5 aggregate base Ton $7.00 1,270 $ 8,890 2" Bituminous walk S.F. 0.60 25,950 $15.570 Total $24,460 5% Contingencies 1,220 $25,680 +30% Legal, Engr., Admin. & Bond Interest 7,700 TOTAL ELRENE ROAD TRAIL $33,380 49504.rpt A-4 II. STORM SEWER Unit Total Unit Erkg Quantity Cost A. TRUNK Clear and grub for ponds L.S. $2,000.00 1 $2,000 Common excavation (Pond Grading) C.Y. ' 2.50 ' 10,000 25,000 Topsoil borrow C.Y. 8.00 200 1,600 12" RCP storm sewer L.F. 22.00 970 21,340 15" RCP storm sewer L.F. 23.00 160 3,680 Improved pipe foundation L.F. 2.00 1,500 3,000 12" & 15" RCP apron Ea. 700.00 5 3,500 Silt fence L.F. 1.00 100 100 Seed Ac. 1,000.00 3.5 3,500 Rip rap C.Y. 50.00 5 250 Standard manhole Ea. 1,500.00 8 12,000 Manhole depth greater than 8' L.F. 60.00 40 2,400 Mechanical trench compaction L.F. 1.00 1,910 1,910 Marker sign w/post Ea. 60.00 5 300 Total $80,580 +5% Contingencies 4.030 $84,610 +30% Legal, Engr., Admin. & Bond Interest 25.380 TOTAL TRUNK STORM SEWER $109,990 49504.rpt A-5 lATER , Unit Total Unit rice Quantity Cost Salvage & install RCP storm sewer L.F. $15.00 30 $450 Bulkhead RCP storm sewer Ea. 100.00 15 1,500 Remove existing storm sewer L.F. 9.00 550 4,950 12" RCP storm sewer L.F. 22.00 200 4,400 15" RCP storm sewer L.F. 23.00 1,100 25,300 18" RCP storm sewer L.F. 26.00 560 14,560 21" RCP storm sewer L.F. 30.00 40 1,200 24" RCP storm sewer L.F. 32.00 320 10,240 27" RCP storm sewer L.F. 38.00 400 15,200 30" RCP storm sewer L.F. 44.00 300 13,200 33" RCP storm sewer L.F. 65.00 300 19,500 30" RCP flared end Ea. 620.00 1 620 33" RCP flared end Ea. 865.00 1 865 Rip rap C.Y. 50.00 50 2,500 Connect to existing structure Ea. 500.00 • 5 2,500 Improve pipe foundation L.F. 2.00 2,000 4,000 Standard catch basin Ea. 750.00 18 13,500 Standard catch basin manhole Ea. 900.00 15 13,500 Standard manhole Ea. 1,000.00 6 6,000 Manhole dp greater than 8'dp (4' dia.) L.F. 60.00 30 1,800 Mechanical trench compaction L.F. 1.00 2,500 2,500 Marker sign w/post Ea. 50.00 8 400 Total $158,685 +5% Contingencies 7,935 $166,620 +30% Legal, Engr., Admin. & Bond Interest 49,990 TOTAL LATERAL $216,610 '7. 1 49504.rpt A-6 / / M. SANITARY SEWER Unit Total Unit Price Quantity Cost A. TRAILS END ROAD 8" D.I.P. sanitary sewer L.F. $50.00 650 $32,500 8" P.V.C. sanitary sewer L.F. 20.00 220 4,400 Outside drop 8" L.F. 150.00 86 12,900 Connect to existing manhole Ea. 500.00 5 2,500 Standard 4' dia. manhole Ea. 1,500.00 7 10,500 MH greater than 8'dp (4'dia.) L.F. 70.00 70 4,900 Improved pipe foundation L.F. 2.00 50 100 Mechanical trench compaction L.F. 1.00 870 870 Total $68,670 +5% Contingencies 3,430 $72,100 +30% Legal, Engr., Admin. & Bond Interest 21,630 TOTAL TRAILS END ROAD $93,730 Unit Total Unit Price Quantity Cost B. ELRENE ROAD 8" P.V.C. sanitary sewer L.F. $17.00 250 $5,270 8" D.I.P. sanitary sewer L.F. 25.00 70 1,750 Outside drop 8" L.F. 150.00 25 3,700 Standard 4' dia. manhole L.F. 1,500.00 5 7,500 Improved pipe foundation L.F. 2.00 50 100 Mechanical trench compaction L.F. 1.00 250 250 Total $18,570 +5% Contingencies 930 $19,500 +30% Legal, Engr., Admin. & Bond Interest 5,850 TOTAL ELRENE ROAD $25,350 49504.rpt A-7 7" IV. WATER MAIN Unit Total Unit Price Quantity Cost A. TRAILS END ROAD 4" D.I.P. Cl. 52 L.F. $14.00 50 $700 6" D.I.P. Cl. 52 L.F. 16.00 420 6,720 8" D.I.P. Cl. 52 L.F. 18.00 1,410 25,380 8" Gate valve & box Ea. 600.00 3 1,800 6" Gate valve & box Ea. 500.00 5 2,500 4" Gate valve & box Ea. 400.00 1 400 Hydrant Ea. 1,200.00 4 4,800 Fittings Lb. 1.00 4,000 4,000 Connect to Ex. WM Ea. 100.00 5 500 Mechanical trech compatction L.F. 1.00 1,880 1.880 Total $48,680 +5% Contingencies 2.440 . $51,120 30% Legal, Engr., Admin. & Bond Interest 15.340 TOTAL TRAILS END ROAD WATER MAIN $66,460 49504.rpt A-8 7 B. ELRENE ROAD (Lateral) Unit Total Unit Price Quantity Cost Wet tap 16" D.I.P. Ea. $2,000.00 5 $10,000 6" D.I.P. Cl. 52 L.F. 16.00 75 1,200 8" D.I.P. Cl. 52 L.F. 18.00 100 1,800 10" D.I.P. Cl. 52 L.F. 20.00 200 4,000 6" Gate valve & box Ea. 500.00 1 500 Water main insulation S.F. 2.50 2,200 5,500 Relocate hydrant Ea. 800.00 . 1 800 Hydrant riser L.F. 500.00 3 1,500 Fittings Lb. 1.00 740 740 Mechanical trench compaction L.F. 1.00 370 370 Total $26,410 +5% Contingencies 1.320 $27,730 +30% Legal, Engr., Admin. & Bond Interest 8.320 TOTAL ELRENE ROAD LATERAL WATER MAIN $36,050 C. ELRENE ROAD (Trunk) Unit Total Unit Price Quantity Cost 16" x 16" connection w/B.V. & box Ea. $5,000.00 1 $5,000 16" D.I.P. L.F. 50.00 30 1,500 Fittings Lb. 1.00 600 600 Total $7,000 +5% Contingencies 360 $7,460 +30% Legal, Engr., Admin. & Bond Interest 2.240 TOTAL ELRENE ROAD TRUNK WATER MAIN $9,700 49504.rpt A-9 77 V. SERVICE Unit Total Unit Price Quantity Cost A. TRAILS END ROAD Wye branch (8" x 4") Ea. 300.00 4 $1,200 Televise sewer service riser E.a. . 400.00 . 3 1,200 Riser pipe (4") L.F. 20.00 60 1,200 Sewer service (4") L.F. 10.00 190 1,900 Sewer cleanout Ea. 200.00 3 600 Corporation stop (1") Ea. 40.00 4 160 Curb stop (1") Ea. 80.00 4 320 Cooper water service (1") L.F. 8.00 180 1,440 Mechanical trench compaction L.F. 1.00 210 210 Total $8,230 +5% Contingencies 410 $8,640 +30% Legal, Engr., Admin. & Bond Interest 2.590 TOTAL SERVICES $11,230 49504.rpt A-10 7S SUMMARY PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE I. STREET IMPROVEMENTS A) Trails End Road $151,340 B) Elrene Road (North Section) 434,560 C) Elrene Road Overlay (South Section) 78,090 D) Elrene Road Bituminous Trail 33,380 II. STORM SEWER A) Trunk 109,990 B) Lateral 216,660 III. SANITARY SEWER A) Trails End Road 93,730 B) Elrene Road 25,350 IV. WATER MAIN A) Trails End Road 66,460 • B) Elrene Road (Lateral) 36,050 C) Elrene Road (Trunk) 9,700 V. SERVICE A) Trails End Road 11,230 Total $1,266,540 49504.rpt A-11 77 APPENDIX B PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL ELRENE ROAD AND TRAILS END ROAD Project No. 589R I. STREET IMPROVEMENTS A. TRAILS END ROAD Parcel Description Front Foot Rate/F.F. Total NE '/a Section 14 • Wescott Hills Revised 2nd Addn. Lot 1 Block 2 93.94 63.87 6,000 Lot 2 Block 2 95.62 63.87 6,108 Westcott Hills Revised 3rd Addn. Lot 15 Block 1 30 63.87 1,916 Lot 16 Block 1 47 63.87 3,002 Lot 17 Block 1 90 63.87 5,749 Wescott Square Outlot G 536.44 63.87 34,265 Lots 1-8 Block 2 314.08 63.87 20,062 Wescott Garden Lots Lot 2 Block 1 628.40 63.87 40,139 The Woodlands North Outlot C 121.99 63.87 7,792 Outlot D 147.91 • '63.87 9,448 Lot 1-16 Block 3 111.03 63.87 7,092 Lot 1-10 Block 4 152.91 63.87 9,767 TOTAL 2369.52 151,340 49504.rpt B-1 S22) B. ELRENE ROAD WITH CURB (North Section) Parcel Description Front Foot Rate/F.F. Tsai NW 1/4 Section 13 West Publishing 4th Addn. Lot 1 Block 2 321.99 63.87* 20,566 Outlot B 2476.94 71.05** 175,989 Outlot C 325.01 71.05 23,092 NE 1/4 Section 14 Parcel 013-01 280 71.05 19,894 Wescott Square Outlot G 273.09 71.05 19,403 The Woodlands North Lots 1-16 Block 3 391.79 0.00 0.00 Outlot A 127.18 71.05 9,036 Outlot B 100.05 71.05 7,109 Outlot D 506.84 71.05 36,012 Lot 1-5 Block 1 517.24 0.00 0.00 Lot 1-7 Block 2 596.03 0.00 0.00 Lot 8 Block 2 200.00 63.87 12.774 TOTAL 6,116.16 323,875 *Assessment Rate = Residential Rate for Trails End Road **Assessment Rate = $434,560 + 6,116.16 = 71.05 C. ELRENE ROAD OVERLAY (South Section) Parcel Description Front Foot Rate/F.F. Total South Hills First Addition Lot 1 Block 2 193.85 6.54* 1,268 Lot 9 Block 2 210.00 6.54 1.373 TOTAL $2,641 * Estimated Cost = $78,090, (32 + 44) x 78,090 = 56,790, Total Length 2,170 L.F.; 4340 F.F. Assessment Rate = ($56,790 + 4,340 F.F.) 0.5 =•$6.54/F.F. 49504.rpt B-2 �� II STORM SEWER A. Trunk Parcel Area Credit Assessable Rate/ Description (Sq. ft.l (Sq. ft.) Area (Sq. ft.) Sq. ft. lats1 NW '/4 Section 13 West Publishing 4th Addition Outlot B 1,180,130 - 1,180,130 $.102 $ 120,373 Outlot C 316,880 - 316,880 .102 32,322 TOTAL $152,695 B. Lateral Parcel Assessable Rate/ Description Area (Sq. ft.) Sq. ft. Total NW 1/4 Section 13 West Publishing 4th Addition Lot 1 Block 2 143,600 - Res. $0.099 $ 14,216 Outlot B 472,400 - Comm. 0.148 69,915 Outlot C 70,000 - Comm. 0.148 10,360 NE 1/4 Section 14 Parcel 013-01 6,870 - Res. 0.099 680 Wescott Square Outlot G 111,880 - Mult. 0.123 13,761 Lots 1-18 Block 2 15,000 Mult. 0.123 1,845 Wescott Garden Lots Lot 2 Block 1 150,000 - Res. 0.099 14,850 Parcel 012-04 (part of Lot 1, Blk. 4) 35,000 - Res. 0.099 3,465 49504.rpt B-3 02\ Parcel Assessable Rate/ Description Area (Sq.ft.) Sq.ft. Total The Woodlands North Outlot A 25,500 - Mult. 0.123 3,137 Outlot B 6,000 - Mult. 0.123 738 Outlot C 15,750 - Res. 0.099 1,559 Outlot D 51,500 - Res. 46,800 - Mult. 0.099, 0.123 10,855 Lots 1-5 Block 1 37,500 - Res. 0.099 3,713 Lots 1-8 Block 2 54,000 - Res. 0.099 5,346 Lots 1-16 Block 3 102,500 - Res. 0.099 10,147 Lots 1-10 Block 4 76,250 - Res. 0.099 7.549 TOTAL $172,136 49504.rpt B-4 g3. III SANITARY SEWER A. Trails End Road Parcel Description Front Foot Rate/F.F. Total Westcott Square Outlot G 536.44 46.57 24,981 Lots 1-18 Block 2 314.08 46.57 14,626 Westcott Garden Lots Lot 2 Block 1 628.40 46.57 29,263 The Woodlands North Outlot C 121.99 46.57 5,681 Outlot D 147.91 46.57 6,888 Lots 1-16 Block 3 111.03 46.57 5,170 Lots 1-10 Block 4 152.91 46.57 7,121 TOTAL 2,012.76 93,730 B. Elrene Road Parcel Description Number of Service Cost/Service Total West Publishing 4th Addition Outlot B 3 $4,255 $12,765 The Woodlands North Lot 1-5 Block 1 1 4,255 4,255 Lot 1-8 Block 2 1 4,255 4,255 Outlot B 1 4.255 4.255 TOTAL 6 $25,530 / O 49504.rpt B-5 IV WATER MAIN A. Trails End Road (Lateral) Parcel Description Front Foot Rate/F.F. Total Westcott Square Outlot G 536.44 33.02 17,713 Lots 1-18 Block 2 314.08 33.02 10,371 Westcott Garden Lots Lot 2 Block 1 628.40 33.02 20,749 The Woodlands North Outlot C 121.99 33.02 4,028 Outlot D 147.91 33.02 4,884 Lots 1-16 Block 3 111.03 33.02 3,666 Lots 1-10 Block 4 152.91 33.02 5,049 TOTAL 2,012.76 66,460 B. Elrene Road (Lateral) Parcel Description Number of Service Cost/Service Total West Publishing 4th Addition Outlot B 2 $7,210 $14,420 Outlot C 1 7,210 7,210 The Woodlands North Lot 1-5 Block 1 1 7,210 7,210 Lot 1-8 Block 2 1 7,210 7,210 TOTAL 5 $36,050 49504.rpt B-6 (5 V SERVICES A. Trails End Road Parcel Description Total Westcott Garden Lots Lot 2 Block 1 $11,230 49504.rpt B-7 8, iN 00 'O N Q' M N N 00 ,g i A M F N M F:4 `O' .-r M v'i :-i ch.'8 �-i ''i N N -f O 11 ri I � vt N N N I O v W N N M 0 44 pd N asw � � w � 1 f:1:1 � M E O G (per M 0 I n.^ � it,. M a � U /) Pa ',,:2, n o � 'i � i 5; nm i. Vii. o (/� R ��y ,-4 M M 'T th ,-4 OO M N. f f aa, a A R i 4. .... ..1"r4 c-sr w $ N. 41 -zi co A A ti A Ran ° I p 'Q W !- 1 4 oN m VI tN Eti g Cs cc�• odo a N � NN A N v '6 -r M h S Q. I� Qz I �-•i '-I O N • t N M • JN va _0 N ti .c-�i ^.� U t 1 N N 8i G4 V U _O _p _p C Q N �C �e •r, 0 O IA O pa W Q 0 A h op �O 02 0 4.' - • .-i o o 8. N 8 o ''' '-4 N n ti 1515 -6 .6 ~ ' ' ' 00 '•, Q+ E- .� 00 a 3a 03 33 333 888833333 33 a. g7 29 Y 22 GOPHER EAGAN Inuw •� ,, •. '6_, i 30 23 OUTLOT I OUTLOT H OUTLOT G o 31 24 YANKEE DOODLE ROAD WESCOTT HILL 44' F-F 8624 012-26 4TH ADD. ��N CONC. C&G 5 6 7 8 2pizy Off, 013-01 OUTLOT C OUTLOT D .mule (►��{l:®Q OG OUTLOT G CONC. C&G ., gli it � pl �A 4' F-F 8624 012-26 1 O VIM © I I rye``' . TAILS I END RD CONC. c&G 111, it- 1 011-02 0, 32' F-F B618 �r Q� O CONC. C&G �' I N-401. 41111111* 36' F-F 6624 2 v CON-. B6• 014 02 0� 4t‘ P OUTLOT E ttiV - Ex. 6" GAS �` EXCEPTION - Ex. 12" GAS k` o 5 \G 1 O 2 QJ� \\ OUTLOT B W 4 ' o � 5. O Fs0O \-O09- \ *IC a X m o +oo �9 S 8 73 Sods to h.t O 041-03 !c, A\ 7 3 �.S' 5 8' BITUMINOUS GR .T •AK' TRAIL 042-03 4 3 2 2 \\ OUTLOT A ••„,c5, 5 4 * '� '� OU 0 7 I OA \ app APO Q� 6 p ® � a Rs. 1 © �<v 5 8 7 ® 17 16 �.O I 3 OUTLOT A Air cF I WIN. REE ADD i 1 I 7 6 5 _,f�lllL 7 1 2 STREET RECONSTRUCTION E. 44' c&c 4 f R 9onestroo AA Rosene • Anderiik &EAGAN, MINNESOTA FIGURE NO. 2 Associates lul ELRENE ROAD\TRAILS END ROAD Engin.er. 6 Archit.cts 2335 West Highway 96 49\49504\49504HBR.DWG APRIL 1991 COMM. 49504 St. Paul, Minnesota 55113 d . :4., . ROW 30' 4- 30' ROW 14' — 16' y 16 _.— ._ a DESIGN GRADE 1/4" per ft. 2 80% N 2.80% 1 4" er ft B618 CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER TRAILS END ROAD ROW 40' _ 40' j 1' 8' 13' 18' , 18' 22' DESIGN GRADE T _ 7 ROW 1/4" per ft. 2.21% 2.21% 1 4" per ft VbR�A�UE 2" BIT .WALK w/6" AGG. BASE 6+56 to 31 +00 8624 CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER ROW ��' 40' t 40' 1'1— 13' 18' 26' 14' DESIGN GRADE R i W 4" 1 per ft . 2.27-1-7 1.48% 1/4" er ft. 2" BIT. WALK w/6" AGG. BASE B624 CONCRETE 5+00 to 6+56 CURB & GUTTER ROW 40' 40' _ _ 1' 8' 5' 26' 18' 22' —yam DESIGN GRADE ROW 1/4" per ft. 2.21% 1 4" per ft VARY 1.48% 2" BIT. WALK 0+70 to 1 +80 w/6" AGG. BASE B624 CONCRETE ELRENE ROAD CURB & GUTTER TYPICAL STREET SECTIONS pi Bonestroo Rosene si vi Anderiik & EAGAN, MINNESOTA FIGURE NO. 2A Associates ELRENE ROAD\TRAILS END ROAD Engineers & Architects 2335 West Highway 38 49\49504\49504HR1.DWG APRIL 1991 COMM. 49504 St. Paul, Minnesota 55113 gr9; • mow 29 Y 22 GOPHER EAUAN stud " ._ 0 1 30 . Z 23 OUTLOT I OUTLOT H OUTLOT G 50 31 0 24 YANKEE DOODLE ROAD WESCOTT HILL$, 2 , 44' F-F 86G 24 012-26 4TH ADD. �v N cONC. C& 5 6 7 8 z�5e 00� 013-01 OUTLOT C OUTLOT D 15 16 19 18 '��®, N - ' • _.D� ••�Q OG OUTLOT G I CONC-C&G 1 WE'S�0 �� �4� � 012-26 09110,1 ' 'aQ ltlIS �A 4' F F 8624 2 I I / pi CONC. C&G ii ' d 1R1111 Ilia p 011-02 0 32' F-F 8618 �r�;111 Q CONC. C&G !/ R ' ,,,∎ 36' F-F B624 W 2rv�% z CONC. C&G ,,, 014-02 �, W • OUTLOT E � ' P00 N• ''--Ex. 6" GAS b'(1` EXCEPTION -- Ex. 12" GAS G N i \ 2 QJ \ OUTLOT B _Ai 1 0 •oo '� sea.In tat sCo ® 0`5\' \4 LEGEND 0`' ass„ ■ a ■ IS ■ IIw FULL RATE o'�'0 0\y.. © `` RESIDENTIAL RATE �� �o •■�■•�� NO ASSESSMENT 041-03 <0 `� 3 �S 8' BITUMINOUS ,T eAK� TRAIL 042-03 3 2 2 / / ® I • OUTLOT A 5 s 7 '� �4 GP `� ;: AGO S O Q�p ® f.d° • R�" 1 2 g 5 8 7 17 16 r.0 I 3 2 1 OUTLOT A ,3 cF I WIN REE ADD Iplillillir 7 6 5 �.�>�'IZIL 7 1 2 fo fR' Bonestroo STREET ASSESSMENT LENGTHS Ex. 44' B624 CONC. C&G Roaene e Anderlik b EAGAN, MINNESOTA FIGURE NO. 2B Associates ELRENE ROAD\TRAILS END ROAD Erpkl..rs a Archit.cts 2335 W.at Highway 36 49\49504\49504HBR.DWG APRIL 1991 COMM. 49504 St Paul, Minnesota 55113 i 9°'' 'r 4 OPK GR" -� \ 1 ® OUTLOT A 3 \` 2 1 WINi REE ADD it *, 1 2 3 4 5 7 `mss ` () #44•P Iva is _ve/r 01 e Z �oT�oz s *IV 8 111171 ® 29, 9 lik6 10 10 r Ap4,,.,‘4,,.,11, - 'rte 73 itr dor 11 m 12 13 14 , Q -�_- h O � 14 15 16 17 18 19 y i' .3)6 ® ® 1 13 .OU LLS , _ , ' # 10/ h ® 13_____-_�� 20 'y it 13 � 2 Q 12 11 ° 1; 5(H ,�� s 11 10 21 " y 6 lig A O 0 10 0 6 i 3---;65-\________z-vi.ii„I 10 s •� \ 4110 6 8 ' 4J`r gi 0 ;: n bria------* p1 J 5 n 10 5 . ' - 8 6 ® I 4 5 6 Q 9 �( ® 7 11 6 1 1 ASSESSMENT 5 n i 0 ov zs . 7. y z (IIEINIA6 L EGEND 3 -� 10 1 3 �— _` m a ® n RESIDENTIAL iii al N^r O— (FRONT FOOT) N M 2 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1 ( s - - - 0 300 600 , 11r 1 \ , \ II ----- Scale in feet STREET OVERLAY pi Bonestroo Rosene • Anderlik b EAGAN, MINNESOTA FIGURE 2C 11 Associates ELRENE ROAD\TRAILS END ROAD Engineers Q Architects 2335 West Highway 96 49\49504\49504-02 APRIL 1991 COMM. 49504 St. Paul, Minnesota 55113 9/ mow 29 Y 22 GOPHER LAVA1v .-......- 0 1 30 i 23 OUTLOT I OUTLOT H OUTLOT G a 31 v 24 YANKEE POODLE ROAD WESGOTT HILLS k2 1 012-26 5 4TH 6 ADD. 7 6 Z�t� 0 013-01 OUTLOT C OUTLOT D 15 � ,a t!� .4E451 ILLS __D�1�`� �G OUTLOT G FUTURE. ,t ►r r. - © w�D'��o • NWL 874 POND JP-33,2 012-26 12 i — (tiL�.Al�� AILS END RD ir•`--\ HWL=880 � :•""" STORAGE VOL=15.0 Ac.Ft.Ma WET VOLUME=7.6 Ac.Ft. C 1 DRAINAGE AREA=53.7 Ac. 011-02 -"0 `J Qf Ql I 4 r r Z 2 ` V „© I POND JP-33.1 Lu g"� r NWL=872 ' 'trr+►� I HWL=878 014-02 -� STORAGE VOL=2.3 Ac.Ft. Q t P WET VOLUME=0.73 Ac.Ft. 1 DRAINAGE AREA=25.9 tc. OUTLOT E QU ,�-Ex. 6" GAS \� 2 EXCEPT Ex. 12" GAS C'7 Dc L \I\ ATERAL AS E SM ENT \ 0� 1 ° 1 QJ�� o AREA = 40. . Ac. �,� 1 2" 5� O W F3�o ® p �O� \ �c.7. OUTLOT B N �c .s\\- \.\ .\ 2�, Q '1O 0 \y, © • 400 i 041-03 <'0 `� soar.ti 3 ""3' " POND JP-1¢ 5 \ X6 NWL=875 POND 831 .7 IAK' HWL=879 NWL=831 GR 042-03 HWL=850 4 3 2 1 ' ►' �, -7-- --- - I Ex. .18" s. 1 4 1 • 1 •" �c O'' `�it -- R OP © P�o ,,Q <2 3 I OUTLOT A Adak 0 WINb REE ADD RI 6 6 2 ., 5 7 1 STORM SEWER R' eonestroo Rosene il Anderllk d EAGAN, MINNESOTA FIGURE NO. 3 Associates ELRENE ROAD\TRAILS END ROAD Engineers d Architects 2335 West Highway 96 49\49504\49504R0B.DWG APRIL 1991 COMM. 49504 St. Paul, Minnesota 55113 9,,Z;. 29 W 22 GOPHER EAGAN I-"-'- ,8,,,.- . •.. 0 1 Y OUTLOT I OUTLOT H OUTLOT G o ...J 30 23 • 31 0 24 YANKEE DOODLE ROAD WESCOTT ADD.LLSO 1 N '' 012-26/ , ' 5 6 7 8 Z�,� 013-01 ' �L1T�O,T'C OUTLOT D / : /' % % '' 15 16 19 18 Z��'�"®, VA �' !' / ,--'' �' �' i I ' ESQ Q-T HILLS ►��: � G OUTLOT G I.ED A�$ O �D1049s1 1 012-26 ;' ;' ,;/1 1213 O 1516 17 2 1 BRUME TRAILS END RD %C',%`-;` �; : : 1 (---3.•• ;� - C � ;%� N j „ „. I, , , , 1 0 / 4 ' ' 7 1 i i i t O ' '� '' i i i i i i 1 lti � ' , , ' / ' ' , / i i / i / i ' 014-02 ���,. 1 CC AO c�. �, �7 �; . OUTLOT E 1, 11) -- ----�----�---J s.,--,--Ex. 6" GAS QV eff, 2 EXCEPTION t, 12" GAS P' i' b�� 1 1 \# \\I G Z IFS ��� OS' J -j, ��°,� o �5 m ��, OUTLOT B N 1— 9- �0�0 6 o ,00 041-03 Scab In ac 3 <0 AP 7 1)a 5 �*. 36 •T CAK 042-03 4 R F< 3 2 N765', - -T- --- --- --- --- I %\ -- -� - 1 Ex. 18" 1 4 OP GO� �(t �'E' Rs 1 0 P ��P Q 3 I 2 1 OUTLOT A WINb REE ADD 1111111r6 6 5 STORM SEWER pi 7 1 2 � 3" R' Bonestroo Aosene In AnderHk & EAGAN, MINNESOTA FIGURE NO. 3A Associates ELRENE ROAD\TRAILS END ROAD Engineers & Architects 2335 West Highway 36 49\49504\49504R0B.DWG APRIL 1991 COMM. 49504 St. Paul, Minnesota 55113 ,j i • mom 29 l i 22 GOPHEK tit/A' it••• ••.,-••... 0 1 Y OUTLOT I OUTLOT H OUTLOT G 50 30 i 23 J 31 24 YANKEE DOODLE ROAD WEStOTT HILL 2 1 012-26 4TH ADD. ' 1e �Nn 5 6 7 8 ZMr 0-AI 013-01 OUTLOT C OUTLOT D 15 • 'ESIJIMIniktv NpG OUT LOT G r - 6 ��0 ; 0122,•7 I ri Novo UTURE SAN. SEWER 1 `v�� ��'�e�� TIL AND RD f��V - ��„� ——--5�� • 011-02 0 I$ / �Q`1I • Ex. 12” RCP-1 i / 4 ` —Ex. 12" RCP Z SAN. SEWER , SAN. SEWER (/) � 7%)41.014-02 �� P OUTLOT E FAO P $ Ex. 6" GAS k'(1` EXCEPTION , Ex. 12" GAS G ° 8" �\��� N 1 R 2 Q�� OUTLOT 8 A z 0 40°6 Sods In test 041-03 !c) 7 err \ 3 �S . It, 5 •T 4 •K' \ -Ex. 9" VCP SAN. SEWER 042-03 3 2 , 8„ OUTLOT A �.� 5 s 7 �� 2 O I 4 OP C,� ^ 4 Q �� Rs 8 1 �(7 6) Q 12 8 5 8 7 11 117 16 �•0 3 2 it- 5cri OUTLOT A °-<!-L--1 WIN REE ADD ' NW s 7 1 2 1 I 7 5 SANITARY SEWER diel Bonestroo Rosene EAGAN, MINNESOTA FIGURE NO. 4 Anderiik &Associates ELRENE ROAD\TRAILS END ROAD Engineers 6 Architects 2335 West Highway 36 49\49504\49504HBR.DWG APRIL 1991 COMM. 49504 St. Paul, Minnesota 55113 t- -.- / '2 .t I29 Y 22 GOPHER EAGAN ""-" ••••••_ 0 1 30 .._i 23 OUTLOT I OUTLOT H OUTLOT G o • 31 w u 24 YANKEE DOODLE ROAD WES'OTT HILL. , �r x. 20" W.M. o12-2s 4TH ADD. 1 i air f, 5 6 7 8 �5 O_ 013-01 OUTLOT C OUTLOT D w w 15 D�`a N •.I I il ILLS , j`` O OG OUTLOT G 012-26 On 1213 14`�/� 1 Ev d`at 6�R_ END RD V z.6" r i • » 1 1 011-02 O fir _ Q: ctt 44-- W 2 IV� J cz 0 : 014-02 VA,. OC I.— „ OUTLOT E iiiii , P --Ex. 6” GAS '(�(j/4t, 1 • ......., e 1 EXCEPTION - Ex. 12" GAS - 1 0 2 Ex. 16" DIP W.M. 1 1 QJ��\ OUTLOT B Cr 'S I" Z o 400 *Me In fast 041-03 3 �0��� �oOQ� 6 qa O 3 �S' • 5 GR •7 OAK. 042-03 4 3 2 10" --- - 2 O I- , Q OUTLOT A •=.� 5 s I 4 ) p -- � R�' 6 1 a k, G) g , 8 5 8 11 17 16 )-A/ I 3 ArS OUTLOT A cF I WINS REE ADD 11111W6 6 1 i 7 5 / 2 1 2 I WATER MAIN 6onestroo Rosen. EAGAN, MINNESOTA FIGURE NO. 5 Anderlik b Associates ELRENE ROAD\TRAILS END ROAD Engineers d Architects 2335 West Highway 36 49\49504\49504HBR.DWG APRIL 1991 COMM. 49504 St. Paul, Minnesota 55113 /" is • O P P E R M A N H E I N S & PA Q U I N VANCE K.OPPERMAN BRADLEY W.ANDERSON ROBERT J.SCHMIT MARTIN D.MUNIC ATTORNEYS AT LAW JAMES E.SCHATZ MARGARET H.CHUTICH 2200 WASHINGTON SQUARE SAMUEL D. HEINS PATRICIA A.BLOODGOOD JEROME F.PAOUIN ANNE L.SCHLUETER 100 WASHINGTON AVENUE SOUTH RICHARD A.LOCKRIDGE ANDREA J.KAUFMAN AUDREY L.ESTEBO JOSEPH M.MUSILEK MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55401 CHARLES N.NAUEN ERIC L.OLSON H.THEODORE GRINDAL BARBARA J.GRAHN TELEPHONE 16121 339-8900 THOMAS B.HEFFELFINGER KEVIN M.CHANDLER FACSIMILE 16121 339-0981 LINDA L.HOLSTEIN JOHN A.TAFT W.JOSEPH BRUCKNER CHRISTOPHER K.SANDBERG HARRY E.GALLAHER 1300 I STREET,N.W. WILLIAM A.GENGLER EAST TOWER,SUITE 480 OF COUNSEL JONATHAN W.CUNEO• WASHINGTON, C.C. 20005 JAMES J.SCHWEITZER• TELEPHONE (202) 962-3650 April 30, 1991 •ADY TEED IN PC.ONLY f FACSIMILE 12021 962-3861 EV 1.x'7 V C \�I HAND DELIVERED a ` ;I AR 3 01991 +; Mr. Thomas Hedges City Administrator 1 J City of Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, Minnesota 55122 Re: Elrene Road Improvements Dear Mr. Hedges: As we discussed, our client, West Publishing Company, has serious doubts as to whether the scheduled improvements on Elrene Road(e.g.,widening, storm sewers,ponding of storm water and the trailway path) are necessary at this time. West's concerns are four-fold. First, as you know, West has no concrete development plans for Outlot B (the parcel adjacent to Elrene Road). Outlot B is part of Phase Three of West's development plans (tentatively scheduled for development sometime after the year 2000). Until West is better able to determine its development plans on Outlot B, West does not want to define or be restricted by easements for storm sewers or storm water ponding. Second, the Final Plat for West Publishing Company, Fourth Addition only provides - for West's access onto Elrene Road from the private driveway serving the two residential lots which are currently being platted as West Publishing Company, Fifth Addition. In addition, the City has indicated that West may gain access from Outlot C if West's development plans call for such access. As you know, West has decided to construct the computer facility which was to be located on Outlot C (at the intersection of Elrene and Yankee Doodle Roads) to Lot 2, Block 1 in the interior of the property. This change reduced West's potential use of Elrene Road and any need for improvements at the present time. Thus, given the limited access onto Elrene Road, it is West's position that the benefits which West would receive from the improvements on Elrene Road would be minimal at best and do not justify the costs associated therewith. Third, the improvements on Trunk Highway 149 ('TH-149") at Becker Road which were required by the Indirect Source Permit ("ISP") have far exceeded what was originally Mr. Thomas Hedges April 30, 1991 Page -2- anticipated both in terms of scope and cost. While the improvements on TH=149 are required to support West's development,neither the Final Environmental Impact Statement nor the ISP identified Elrene Road as a roadway which had to be improved in order to accommodate West's development. Accordingly, it is West's position that such improvements are, at the present time, unwarranted and unnecessary. Fourth, Yankee Doodle Road is scheduled to be upgraded by Dakota County in 1994. As you know, West has held off connecting its internal road with Yankee Doodle Road until the County improvements are made thereby eliminating the need to tear out a portion of the roadway twice (both West's internal drive and Yankee Doodle Road). The City's current plans to upgrade Elrene Road would also require portions of both roadways to be installed and torn out twice. Therefore, assuming the improvements to Elrene Road are warranted (an assumption which West questions), the improvements should be made in concert with the upgrade of Yankee Doodle Road so as to avoid duplication of effort and cost. For the reasons set forth above, West opposes the City's plans to upgrade Elrene Road at the present time. In addition, it is my understanding that Robert Engstrom expressed similar concerns about the improvements to Elrene Road when the City first considered making the improvements. If you would like to discuss this matter prior to the City Council meeting on May 7, 1991, please call. If I do not hear from you, I will assume that the City Council has postponed the matter indefinitely pending further study. Sincerely yours, OPPER DINS_& PAQUIN (1(.Z o Harry E. allaher HEG/C7 c. J. Nasseff S. Bryant V. Opperman Agenda Information Memo May 7, 1991 City Council Meeting PROJ. 546, FINAL ASSESSMENT HEARING CEDARVALE BLVD. RESURFACING C. Project 546,Final Assessment Hearing(Cedarvale Boulevard Resurfacing)--On April 2nd, the final assessment roll for the above-referenced project was presented to the Council with a formal public hearing being scheduled for May 7th. Enclosed on page is a summary tabulation of that final assessment roll as compared to the estimates contained in the feasibility report presented at the public hearing held on March 7, 1989. All notices have been published in the legal newspaper and sent to all affected property owners informing them of the final assessment hearing on May 7th. In addition, an informational meeting was scheduled for 2:00 p.m. on August 30th to provide an opportunity for staff to meet with the affected property owners to review the project and its related assessments and discuss any concerns they may have. Unfortunately, no one appeared at this informational meeting. Subsequently, staff will try to address any concerns that may arise at the formal public hearing within the timeframes provided. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To close the public hearing and approve the final assessment roll for Project 546 (Cedarvale Boulevard Resurfacing) and authorizes certification to Dakota County. FINAL ASSESSMENT HEARING /PROJECT NUMBER: 546 ASSESSMENT HEARING DATE: May 7, 1991 SUBDIVISION/AREA: CEDARVALE BOULEVARD PUBLIC HEARING DATE: MARCH 7. 1989 IMPROVEMENTS INSTALLED AND/OR ASSESSED: P.B. - Feasibility Report FINAL P.R. FINAL F.R. SANITARY SEVER RATES RATES STORM SEVER RATES RATES. [' Trunk ❑ Trunk [' Laterals ❑ Laterals [' Service ❑ Lat. Benefit/ Trunk ❑ Lat. Benefit/ Trunk • WATER STREETS © CURB AND ❑Trunk $ 15.31/ff $ 5.38/ff GUTTER ❑Laterals LI OVERLAY 18.31/ff 15.06/ff [' Service ❑ Res. Equiv. ❑Lat . Benefit/ ❑ Multi Equiv. Trunk ❑ C/I Equiv. . ❑WAC ❑ Trail • SERVICES STREET LIGHTS ❑ Water & San. Sewer ❑ Installation ❑ Energy Charge CONTRACT # OF INTEREST AMOUNT CITY NO. PARCELS TERMS RATE ASSESSED FINANCED $ 71 ,512.73 $353,619.97 88-17 14 10 Yrs . 8 % 57.585.22 F.R. 289,415.00 F.R. COMMENTS: Agenda Information Memo May 7, 1991 City Council Meeting PROJ. 524, FINAL ASSESSMENT HEARING JOHNNY CAKE RIDGE ROAD D. Project 524,Final Assessment Hearing Johnny Cake Ridge Road (Continued to June 4, 1991)--On April 16th, a public hearing was held to present and discuss the final assessments associated with the above-referenced project. At that time, representatives of the affected property owner (Willmus Properties) presented objections to the method and amounts of the final assessments proposed against their property. As a result of those objections, the Council continued the public hearing until May 7th. Since that time, staff has met with the property owner and further discussed their concerns. As a result of this meeting and additional information being submitted, staff needs additional time to research various issues to be able to properly respond before the final assessment roll is formally adopted. Therefore, it is recommended that this final assessment public hearing be continued until June 4, 1991. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To continue the final assessment public hearing to June 4, 1991 for Project 524 (Johnny Cake Ridge Road). // Agenda Information Memo May 7, 1991 City Council Meeting ausiress BLACKHAWK PARK IMPROVEMENTS A. Blackhawk Park Improvements--The planning process for land acquisition and development of Blackhawk Park as a community park land dates back to the early 1970s. Acquisition of the park land occurred during the 1970s and 1980s and in October, 1987, a grant application was submitted for state and federal funding that would provide a variety of community opportunities ranging from a large picnic pavilion to open skating, speed skating, multiple trails, sledding area, handicap fishing pier and many other uses. Through a public review process that began in December of 1990, the original concept for Blackhawk Park has been revised to incorporate many of the requests by the neighborhoods. Additional neighborhood meetings were held as recent as March and April with members of the City Council to discuss proposed changes to the design the Advisory Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission considered at the April 4 meeting. For a copy of those revisions requested by the neighborhoods,which has been evaluated and taken into consideration during the revised design for Blackhawk Par refer to pages through b). Also enclosed for City Council review on pages I(j'+ through ' is a memo entitled "Blackhawk Park: Refined Plan" as prepared by the Director of Parks and Recreation. This memo includes a history, cost projections, addresses the street intersection and includes various attachments for consideration. Each member of the City Council was issued a notebook entitled "Blackhawk Park Design Manual" that should include copies of surveys analysis, a synthesis of information,public input and other pertinent information for City Council review on this agenda item. It should be noted that the Advisory Parks and Recreation Commission is recommending approval of the Blackhawk Park improvements according to their action take at the April 4, 19,91 Commission meeting. For a copy of those minutes, refer to pages take( at < < . ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny improvements for Blackhawk Park as recommended by the Advisory Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission with or without modification. c01 RECEIVED tit■R 5 1991 SUGGESTED REVISIONS • * Assurances an later Duality 4or. t'lackhawk Lake * Down size Murphy Access parking lot to 60 cars (Include assurances of not expanding it latter) * Eq:sa1 sized and visible entrance signs for all accesses * Design Murphy access to best funnel traffic into Park * C.c: F a:i,l i o n * r=. .e M_.rohv access road 2C feet farther from neighborhood and provide adequate buffer space and barriers * r.11 entrance construction start concurrently • !l`,.-e cr_.r e activity tc the North side . * North side 25 to .75 car tuck in lot i Lee .'e the 44sI k-in access on Murphy parl::wry generally tut-a1 �i ;-==urer,ce_ on future development of Murphy triangle north Lf M�tr �•h. access * Safety re.•iew with neighborhood on Murphy access * Fre_erve trees in observation area near the pond on the east side of part: $ limitations an the location, amount of and hours for Iichtinc t Soft surfaced pathways TirAr -1-41.417 / • CillA‘Akih I I gPir. e,Li) REQUESTED REVISIONS CITIZENS FOR A BETTER BLAC HAWK PARK 111-.Z intersection at park access road and Murphy Parkway - * Entrance construction begin concurrently if multiple accesses are planned • Assurances that Murphy Parkway or Riverton will not be the sole entrance to the park. • Safety review with neighborhood regarding access, i.e. street lights , speed limit, signs, etc . Nk Move Murphy access road southwest 20 feet and provide fence or buffer 1- Assurances on future development of Murphy triangle north of proposed road on Murphy access . This should be come part of the Park and kept in its native state . *iurphy access lot limited to 60 .cars with no future expansion * Alternate configuration for pavilion ( s ) to accommodate multiple srall groups throughout the park . The pavilions should be designed for family and friends small gatherings not for the large gatherings . * Limit Park hours . (i.e . close at 9 ; 00 ) * Close Murphy Park access road during winter months'' • Allow all types of sled on the hill, don' t make it a tubing hill * Access to the playground with strollers • MEMORANDUM TO: THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL TOM HEDGES, CITY ADMINISTRATOR FROM: KEN VRAA, DIRECTOR OF PARKS AND RECREATION DATE: MAY 1, 1991 RE: BLACKHAWK PARK: REFINED PLAN At the City Council Meeting on May 7, the staff will present the Blackhawk Park plan which has been recommended for approval by the Advisory Parks, Recreation and Natural Resource Commission. This May 7 Meeting ends a long history of review of the design for Blackhawk Park which dates back to the early 1970s. It is not the purpose of this memo to detail all of the events, meetings and design work that has preceded the refined plan but a brief summary. Staff has previously provided the Council with the Blackhawk Park Design Manual on March 19. Additions to that Design Manual were provided to you in April which included the Minutes of the Special Meeting of the Commission on March 14, staff's response to issues raised at that meeting, cost projections, miscellaneous letters and records of telephone calls regarding Blackhawk Park, petitions from residents on the north side of Blackhawk Park, a proposal for development of the park presented by the Blackhawk Park Association and the Minutes of the April 4 Commission Meeting. BACKGROUND In the early 70s, the Eagan Park Development Guide identified the need for several community parks within the city to meet future needs of the community. At that time, it was envisioned that community parks would have a service area of three to six neighborhoods with an average site size of 50 acres. Design standards indicated that desired on site facilities for these community parks would include play apparatus, ballfields, tennis courts, hard surface play areas, open field areas for games, picnic areas,water service, parking area, sledding slopes and shelters that included toilets. Presumably, this is what was intended for Blackhawk Park when the first land acquisition of approximately forty acres was made with funding assistance from a HUD grant In the 80s, there were numerous other acquisitions to Blackhawk Park encompassing the 80 plus acres that now comprise the land holdings for this community facility. Also in the mid-80s, it was determined that a south access to Blackhawk Park would be an essential component to this park. Various scenarios for development of the park evolved over the years. � `"1( Blackhawk Park: Refined Plan May 1, 1991 Page 2 Up until the recent design effort, the most refined plan was the grant application submitted in October, 1987. This grant application depicted a south access into the park with a long access road through the park with two parking lots accommodating upwards of 350 cars. A large picnic pavilion with horseshoe opportunities were provided in the area east of the woodline. Open skating, speed skating and a skating trail were envisioned; multiple trails around the east end of Blackhawk Lake, a boardwalk, a bridge, open play areas, a warming house, sledding area, prairie area, handicap fishing pier, nature observation blind, observation plaza, canoe launch, general picnic grounds and multiple, satellite picnic areas for the park. When staff began the public review process in December of 1990, staff approached the community with the concept that the City was willing to keep the design of the park open and develop the most effective park plan for Blackhawk Park. The current park plan incorporates many of the requests by the neighborhoods; specifically, the multiple trails system around the east end of the lake is now reduced to one. Rather than bituminous, much of this trail is now soft surface. Rather than a singular access to the park, there are now two access points and two different locations for the parking lots. One has been moved to the south, virtually eliminating a long road into the park. The size of the parking lots and the size of the pavilion have been reduced and were reduced again by the Advisory Parks, Recreation and Natural Resource Commission at its April meeting. The boardwalk has been eliminated on the east end of the lake, the nature blind in the northwest quadrant has been eliminated with other refinements being made to reduce the size of the impact on Blackhawk Park. Many of these changes have been as a result of the community input and staffs detailed review which was assisted by the consultant services of Bonestroo, Rosene, Anderlik and Associates, Pat Jostad, Environmentalist, and the efforts of consultant traffic engineers, Short, Elliott & Hendrickson. In addition, staff has done an internal audit of other communities' pavilion needs/usage to help ascertain the size and future need for covered picnic spaces in the Eagan parks systems. Staff has done an extensive review of the impact on the parks resource and lake water quality. The plan has also received a letter of endorsement from the Minnesota River Valley Audubon Club which congratulates the city for its leading environmental role and in the changes to the previous Blackhawk Park plan which meets the original concerns of the Audubon Club. COST PROJECTIONS Cost projections for the entire park development are attached. These projects will be further refined in the contract document phase. It is also likely that the timing of the development would be spread out over a period of years. Not all expenditures would be encumbered in one fiscal year. For example, the master plan developed for Trapp Farm Park has yet to be completed. Trails at Trapp leading to and from the park were added last year, additional trails leading to the north and west are to be constructed in the future and satellite picnic shelters are yet to be constructed. Blackhawk Park: Refined Plan Page 3 May 1, 1991 Consequently, it should be noted that development of this park is likely to take place over a period of years and not be completed in one or two construction season. STREET INTERSECTION Residents along Murphy Parkway have requested the City develop a 'T' intersection with the road into Blackhawk Park. A separate report is being prepared at this time by the Engineering Department and Landscape Architect which will be provided to you dealing with the cost and engineering of such an alternative However, the traffic study performed by Short, Elliott & Hendrickson indicates that thee is no need for such an intersection based on traffic needs. FOR COUNCIL ACTION To approve or disapprove the refined plan for Blackhawk Park, provide direction to staff concerning additional refinements that may be necessary and to authorize development of the construction documents for first phase construction. If members of the Council have any additional questions regarding the Blackhawk Park Plan, I would be pleased to provide you with a response. KV/nh 0 1, I I L---- , ■I______I I I I I I it I I2 II • • 11•■••SIM II . I mar -1-) .0. till I roll IP! IIII ilill it:is 114711 Ir., Barn 1112:21‘ifola 3 VI 1 0 ....ar! r--. ,..4-...;,..4,_,R 3..k.,, . .„.....-- ... , s.„ : . .• - .1.-„...• ..,....•,,,...-:. ,,, -,... - it,,,,...„....„.., v..., . -zw--7 ,--.7- 7, —,+Ir - -- , 44 --- _-_-:,,' s .3.-.1 - # -s, :1,...., . - , ...-.1- .,-,,,-.___;;;; is ,...... , ..... ..... - = - -...s;_7_- -. - ,_. -i• - 4-'a - - - ar: -r'-.A°2104(Vis.„1...',, .......-7„-_, ,,.. - i-4.- ;E..7#'' :- •,:.1. -4 ^:2■1 l't■ 0 , .4..-_,Ii- sift _- ....c.1 ...#4.- ■,) QV, . 11 --....1:-','' , ,. -, - ■ ."4" -=-_----- 7...7.' . ' -,',. ED . .r., e.,.-.. t... ..10- . ,-- +7 ,ff, .,- - _7' _?!...2A,j;i.. ■ ....".„.„.. . -._•_:- - *, t. `-;''-, ,7,'' 7-2,'" 1 :- -- -_-_4';',‘ 0 ' - l''' 4 - •i =_`,,-- Z-_ --,4k 00 i K.> , - '!' ... ,-.) .-. , . - _-- ;•- _ - . • ___..,-...k-.0, . -. air - '; 2=8.. '',; . l'.4--"‹....."‘ :**);As. ■CI ji -r-_ ,‘'n " " ------ik. - — I a ' -'-' --1-' -4 - - - ;', ,.- - ,, ...-•,,,t• ' A . , _ •'... ,,,, .,- ;,, -t ......, ., o , - - -----4.-4 Nri.. ,# ,;', ,.... --,,,,---- - ° - cs,- 7, 2 7 - \ \ ---, ,--.. •, : ,. ..., . ,, ...„,._ ...' „ . ,, 7 . o• fil - - , -Z - \IF „I, , ....., \ //, t. , , /„, • ....._,_,- ,),„ ..., a , -_ ,, ,ti, 44 - i g \ \ 0 ,\ „ 0- / n7 a IPA 7:-..----'---- '41 / , -•-- . - Z ,:,..--- -4- '. , , ,T1) , / 1 ------ t ' ' . ' ' ' ,..: ' -5 ,.76' / 1 1 .....„,, ,; ,, - , ,_- .- , , ',i , Z / / (A'' ' -12 L ‘,. . ,,; ,-- -- ‘.0 ‘, , _ / 4.-- ... / / 7 • i ' !1- - , , / : .0 , / --„, , , - ', i 4, g - ,. , -c.N. \ \ \ \ .---'s------------L \ \ .N.-- I.6 a C •i ; , •i.\,......,, ■ I, fia. \ \ \ • ‘-',..7-''• ' 1 , ',i \ ----- I .0 1 001 f , •I, , I ‘ :". It ' - • ; ■. ....,...N.... • .,_,,,,, NNN., ' . :''S: ''\„„ ,,,,, 's ■I'' ■' ,.... 1 iL ...., .. '''''',,_. CD ,, -... -:. • V ,' 0 - Z c biackhawk community park j I, r......L. .'\ Icky of eagon refined plan ..............____. :-... L 4ible KS & recreation I 01 (----- :-. .- —,. i 7. *apart men t j eagan, minnesota —, ..._}..../ `... - 1 1 L_� ----I-_J I I I I 1 1 1 11 / OEM=NOM 2 1: --3 Li-rj * t :1-11 :-J 1 80 ilikailliiiiitiatigrilli - '-' En& 'S I i I _ .. ; I'}.• •,'`, , M'i 0.3,1V i ADVISORY PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL RESOURCES COMMISSION MINUTES OF APRIL 4, 1991 MEETING PAGE 10 2. Parking lot be 65 spaces at Palisade and 105 at Murphy Parkway 3. Trails are accepted as in the plan. 4. Bridge is recommended across narrow end of the lake. • 5. Shelter building on top of the hill 6. Reforestation according to specifications and mindful to foot and vehicular traffic with privacy of the neighbors a high priority. 7. Present Murphy Parkway entrance accepted. Engineering and staff to work together to see if a tee access would be acceptable. John Griggs amended that park closing time of 11:00 should be reviewed and changed if problems exist. The motion passed with George Kubik, Ted Billy, Shawn Hunter and Jack Johnson voting in favor and Deborah Johnson, Michael Vogel and John Griggs voted against. John Gri::cs noted that the only reason he voted against the park was the 225 parking places. He believed it should have been at the average of 210 which was voted on by the Commission. He does support the rest of the plan. Michael Vogel would have liked to see the parking spaces at 175. Ted Billy retorted that he almost voted no becz.:se the number should have been 250. HIGHLINE TRAIL GRADING Steve Sullivan reported that staff has met with Paul Thomas,the engineer for the developer. Pipe scenario will nr: wori, because the park pond is not large enough. Another alternate will divert water across Wilderness . . Run Road to another pond which accommodate the water. That is the preferred plan. Once the Engineering has res7 onde' and Tri-land has given its response, it will be brought back to the Commission for review before any wori: commences. After disct.ssion. it was decided to hold 'Signage at City Ha11" over till the next Commission Meeting, ARBOR DAY Commission was informed ty John VonDeLinde that invitations were forthcoming for the Arbor Day event on April 27. George Kubik then moved and Shawn Hunter seconded that the Commission adopt the Arbor Day Resolution as presented. The motion passed with all members voting in favor. HAPPENINGS Dorothy Peterson reported that both new student interns,Benita Soller and Jules Erickson,were involved with the April Fools Day event,the Beach Party and both Egg Decorating Contests. Jon Oyanagi has been putting league schedules together utilizing a recently purchased software package. This years teams number over 200 in 22 leagues. George Kubik noted the development of Camp Creative, the Nature Camp and almost 3,000 softball pla:.ers Dorothy further explained the Nature Camp will take place the second week of August to offer availability to k;ds ir. Eagan to take part in a wide variety of nature challenges. The 2.3 day activity at Thomas Lake o`iers a number of novel ideas such as an excursion of bug collecting followed b} eating a Turtle Sundae. ADVISORY PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL RESOURCES COMMISSION MINUTES OF APRIL 4, 1991 MEETING PAGE 4 Ted Billy stated if a senior center is included in the building,it should be designed for both those who live in and out of the building. George Kubik added that it should also be handicap accessible. Dale Runkle indicated that congregate dining is proposed but a senior center has not been brought up. After some discussion John Griggs seconded the motion with all members voting in favor. Ted Billy asked what the parks dedication should be regarding physical landscaping and trails. Ken Vraa indicated it would be based on the units included. IS congregate dining could be added, maybe parks dedication could be waived. Ken recommended that the cash dedication requirement be left open-ended. A motion was made to: 1. Preserve the oak stand by revising the grading plan. 2. Landscape plan be revised to provide additional buffer from the park. 3. Developer be responsible for 6'wide sidewalk on the north side from Park Center Drive to Cliff Road. 4. An 8' trail along Cliff Road with City staff reviewing trail link from the senior center to Rahn Park 5. The project be subject to cash parks dedication with encouragement to developer to develop activities area. It was moved, seconded by Jack Johnson and passed unanimously. BL4CKH4«K PARK Director Vraa outlined the information given in addition to the packet and indicated there were re,'resertatives who wished to speak. He reminded the Commission of the following items from the March 20 me:. crand,:rn addressing Blackhawk Park issues brought up at the March 14 meeting. 1. Road access easements are permanent easements from Mentor. 2. The east and west parking lots could only be connected with extensive grading of a 25% incline. 3. and 4. No comments 5. There is no sign program as yet. Signs at primary entrances are appropriate with additional directional signs to the primary entrances. 6. and i. No comments 8. Phased development is typical. It is unusual to complete a park in a two year cycle. Phasing is done according to a comprehensive master plan so work fits with preceding work. 9. We have addressed and offered cost comparison on bridge versus boardwalk. Staff continues to believe there should be a connection across the lake. With cost differential considered, Staff recommends the floating boardwalk. 10. Regarding the skating rink, staff does not have a preference. 11. No comments. 12. Additional information from the Historical Society regarding history and archeological resources has been handled by John VonDeLinde whose most recent correspondence from Wayne Sames of the Minnesota Department of Trade and Economic Development, with a copy to Dennis Gimmestad of the Minnesota Historical Society. Mr. VonDeLinde read from the letter as follows: " The Historical Society did not recommend any further study or surveys of the area. This last point is significant since the Historical Society will normally recommend an archeological and historical survey of an area if it has any reason to believe that important sites might exist,even if there is no existing concrete evidence or file information. \.0 ADVISORY PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL RESOURCES COMMISSION MINUTES OF APRIL 4, 1991 MEETING PAGE 5 `As far as this office is concerned, the proposed project was reviewed in the same manner as all other proposed Outdoor Recreation Grant projects and there is no reason to question the recommendations of the Historical Society in that regard. On the question of whether Historical Society reviews automatically expire after some specific period of time I can tell you that I have never heard of such a provision.' Regarding maintenance,mowing and trail grooming,Mr.Vraa referred to the packet for reading of further information. Winter maintenance of the south access road would not be ideal in the opinion of Arnie Erhart, Eagan's Street Superintendent, but the downward slope does facilitate the maintenance operation. Jerry Rhodes, 1858 Murphy Parkway, Citizens for a Better Blackhawk Park. Mr. Rhodes'objective was to advise the Commission that his group is still alive and active. On a separate sheet provided to the Commission the Citizens' Group started with four requirements and then added twelve requested revisions (also in the packet). After a meeting with Mr. Vraa last Tuesday,they came to a painful compromise. He thanked Mr. Vraa for the time he spent. 1. The tee intersection might be workable. He said that Mr. Vraa had indicated at their meeting it was a good suggestion but added that staff had not gotten sufficient information from Engineering yet. A flatter area of roadway is needed at that intersection and will be looked at. 2., 3. The 1991 map shows both accesses to the park. 4. As a safer review, there are 27 boys and girls on Murphy Parkway. George Kubik added that the Commission shares his concern for the children's safety. 5. Mr. Rhodes would like to move the access SW 20 feet. Rather than get into a long discussion, he added that he would discuss this point later. 6. Mr. Rhodes brought up the Leo Murphy triangle of land bordered by the access, the park and residents' lots. He said Mr. Vraa indicated that the Parks Department is looking at that for future park dedication. 7., 8. Mr. Rhodes stated that the parking lot size and pavilion size would encourage larger groups in the park and pose an encroachment on their properties. 9. Re g a dir:g the park hours,Mr. Rhodes believes that Hennepin County Parks close at 10 p.m. and feels that 9:X p.m. seems plenty late enough. Eleven o'clock is too late 10. The Murphy access should be closed during the winter months. Buses have difficulty picking up the children. Most of the winter activities are going to be some on the west side of the park, therefore, it is Ecir;g to be difficult to get to those activities from the east parking lot. The park will be used only for a natural hangout. 11. Allow all types of sleds for activities on the hill or have different hills for different activities. 12. No comment. He requests that the Commission continue to listen to the Citizens Concerned for a Better Blackhawk Park. Give them the same thought and consideration as if their homes and investments are tied to that park. Mike Murphy,3882 Palisade Way. Mr. Murphy represents the Blackhawk Park Association of 14 households with a petition with 173 citizens signatures. 'Their major objection is that none of the citizenry is aware of the magnitude of the park project. They have retained the Larkin Hoffman Law Firm and introduced Mr.Bill Griffith,a specialist in land use-en,ironmental law, and Mr. Jeff McDonald, a landscape architect. Mr C:Z....r. informed the Commission that his firm has developed a reputation of balancing land use issue_ instead of lawsuts. His petitioners support most of the City's plan for Blackhawk Park. Mr. Griffith reiterated history of the Park's development and stated that his people support a reasonable development of the park and protection of the residents. ADVISORY PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL RESOURCES COMMISSION MINUTES OF APRIL 4, 1991 MEETING PAGE 6 Many homes have been there for 30 years which is why they are not suggesting a strong configuration of park planning. If park acquisition had come after the neighborhood, more buffering would have been allowed. Maintaining the natural environment is the residents' desire and they do not see that in the present plan. The Palisade access is merely a dead end road that the city acquired. It is ten to twenty feet from the residents' bedroom windows. Compatibility has to be considered. Given the weight of earlier planning, residents were surprised to see a sixty car parking lot outside their homes. Active recreation areas are also fifty feet from their back yards. The tubing hill and warming shelter are three hundred feet from the back yards. Regarding the pavilion areas and parking lots,residents fail to see the need and want downsizing of those areas. Sixty spaces is enough below and twenty spaces adequate up above. The traffic report indicated minimum impact on the intersection and roadways but residents will notice this. A better way to reduce the traffic is to downsize. Mr. Griffith quoted his company's president saying 'Don't bring me problems without solutions'. He then introduced Mr. Jeff McDonald, Landscape Architect Mr. McDonald presented his plan based on the use analysis made by the City.. •He proposed to relocate and resin the pavilion and play areas and thereby help the environment. The pavilion was downsized and buildings separated. • The pond will handle all runoff and reduce the rate of stagnation. Satellite picnic and games closer to the parking lot and away from the residents' homes. Plant material already on site will reduce maintenance and evergreens planted nex to houses will maintain privacy. Shrub layer between boundary layer and aspens and birch work their wa into the park. Pavilion sits along the hill by larger parking lot...the parking lot is shaded to keep cars cooler. Pathways move around play area separating space and making good access to the pavilion. Mr. McDonald stated that the pavilion size, according to the 91 Park Survey, is two times the average size of typical community pavilion sizes in Lakeville and Apple Valley, According to the Park Systems Plan,the description of a community park gives lee�a�. There are a lot of positives about this program but the residents need to be protected. The park must be dowrsized. Gunner Isberc. 1528 Blackhawk Ridge Court. Mr.Isberg walked the northern perimeter and talked to people who support the Blackhawk Park Plan. He presented the Commission with a petition with 39 signatures. He urges the Com.mission to approve and implement the plan. The trail system with the east path is good and a boardwalk is • very important. Gravel will give the park a natural Iook. The trail system will also stop erosion. It would preserve the area on a permanent basis. Rick Day, 1621 Murphy Parkway. Regarding the road into Blackhawk Park, he believes construction would close off some pond drainage and the rusty equipment west of Murphy Parkway may also cause pollution. He does not want to save the park at the expense of the ponds. John Rueeieri. 1455 Blackhawk Lake Drive. Landscape Architect,park planner,also represents Minneapolis Park Board. f;nalist in St. Anthony Falls Interpretive Center. Surveyed the area and his concern is that he has to drive too far to get his children to a play area. We need lake access from north around and over the lake but it should be accessible by foot. It would be easier for a child to play and slide with good access from the north. Paul Hanson, 3900 Riverton Avenue. Mr. Hanson stated that we have discussed the residents around the park but have not discussed the residents in the park. Dakota County has worked hard to preserve wildlife and the City of Eagan, is being too selfish. Mr. Hanson questioned the credibility of Pat Jostad and two specialists who were supposed to be from the University of Minnesota but he could not locate them. Regarding the land swap with Leo Murphy, Mr. Hanson questioned bow much money was lost. Ken Vraa interjected that discussion of a land swap was not germane to the park development issue and George Kuhl stated that Eagan has been a spearhead with water quality and wildlife preservation. We have to be careful of what tie percei'e nature to be for it has different definitions to different people. Ken Ische. 3SS1 Palisade Way. If the Park Commission would put themselves in the position of living on Murphy Parkway or in Palisade or Riverton areas, we would come up with a proposal satisfactory to all concerned. ADVISORY PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL RESOURCES COMMISSION MINUTES OF APRIL 4, 1991 MEETING PAGE 7 Brad Allen, 1619 Blackhawk Lake Drive. He understands bow the Riverton people feel. His concern is to have boardwalk and trailway system. Young children have started a nature club in his area and they need an entrance to the park and trail access. He objects to the park closing at 9:00 p.m. because it is still light at that time in the summer. Mike McGinn, 1451 Blackhawk Lake Drive, is in favor of a trail around the lake. It is important that the lake be secure because it appears erosion is already occurring. Wildlife should be protected perhaps with an area for humans and an area for wildlife. Regarding policing the area,we need trails to gain access from the north side. Gary Blasberg, 1610 Murphy Parkway. Mr. Blasberg was concerned that the 1991 city map already shows new access from both Murphy Parkway and Blackhawk Lake Drive. George Kubik assured him that the map indicates park boundaries. Marty Welch, 1597 Murphy Parkway, Regarding keeping the park open, he feels it would be a teenage hangout and that the park should close at dusk. Monica Anderson, 1606 Murphy Parkway,questioned if the police reports had been checked. George Kubik replied that that was one of the topics for discussion. After a brief break, the meeting reconvened at 9:14 p.m. Deborah Johnson's opening remarks were that 1) 11:00 is too late to keep the park open. It does take time to get people cleared out after the closing time. 2) Pavilion servicing 250 people that close to a residential area is too large. Her concern is that many people will be disruptive to wildlife. Shaw-n Hunter said he was in favor of a large pavilion because of a need. John Griggs'concern is that the pavilion for 250 people is too concentrated and perhaps two pavilions of 125 each would be better. Deborah Johnson wants one pavilion accommodte 125 people. George Kubik added,regarding the hours, that we have an eleven o'clock closing in all our parks. That has not proven to be a problem in the parks in the past. John Griggs encouraged comments from the other Commission members. Jack Johnson asked John Vor.DeLinde how the size compared with Trapp Farm and Thomas Lake. John VonDeLinde replied that these pavilions generally accommodate between 125 and 150 people. Ms. Johnson questioned whether we had the numbers of reservations for larger groups. Mr.VonDeLinde replied,yes, 1990 showed 22 reservations turned down due to them being reserved concurrently. Thirteen were turned down due to size limitations. John Griggs further questioned what groups constituted those requests and VonDeLinde replied churches, local organizations and corporations. John Griggs questioned further if design fleribility is feasible to build two pavilions that could also serve 125 people each. Ted Billy tbccght that was the original intent. John VonDeLinde discussed the multiple use facility. A number of communities are moving in that direction. Richfield provides for up to 300 people with a movable partition as does Hennepin county parks. John Griggs asked if two separate roof tops had been considered to which Ted Billy replied that that was the original plan. Ted also stated, regarding time, that the eleven o'clock closing could be adhered to and if that creates a problem, it could be addressed later. If the pavilion accommodates 250 people, then we could limit the size that could use it George Kubik stated that one statistic is that we doubled requests for reservations in the last three years. If 35 parties were turned away, that is one out of 5 we turn away. At the present rate of growth, we would be turning away a lot more. \'onDeLinde discussed use patterns of other communities by paraphrasing his Community Fa i or.S`,e;ter Survey-1991 as found in the Commission's Blackhawk Park Book. All concurred that they should have built larger facilities because community use has increased. J ADVISORY PARKS,RECREATION AND NATURAL RESOURCES COMMISSION MINUTES OF APRIL 4, 1991 MEh 1 LN G PAGE 8 John further added that,as with athletic fields years ago,playing catch up is a difficult thing to do. With the fast expansion of the community,John wondered where we would go as the demand will be there. Ted Billy questioned, given the two designs, whether the bridge would be cheaper to maintain. John VonDeLinde replied that,yes,maintenance would be easier on a fixed bridge. The life expectancy would be twelve to fifteen years. Citing the bridge at O'Leary, there would be very low maintenance. John Griggs wondered what the design parameters were regarding water levels for the hundred year rains and ice skating. Steve Sullivan stated that the bridge design is according to Exhibit C,made of Corten, and would be located well above the hundred year frequency. Price includes the bridge and footings. Not included is the crane that would place the bridge. John Griggs asked what the height would be with ice underneath to which Steve replied about ten feet. Mr. Griggs stated he was in favor of the fixed bridge because it allows skating and cross country skiing. Michael Vogel, regarding the pavilion, questioned the average size of a reservation. If the pavilion would accommodate multiple groups,he definitely is in favor of it. John Griggs recommends downsizing. Michael Vogel proposed a pavilion serving three groups of fifty each. John VonDeLinde reiterated that the communities he talked to stated they had built too small. Ted Billy proposed a multi-purpose facility that could handle five groups of fifty or one group of 250. Shawn Hunter said the VonDeLinde study speaks for itself. We need a large pavilion. If we delay the pa‘i;ion,we'll be the same as we were for athletic fields. John Griggs thought the study made the assumption that we will not be building another pavilion in another park. Shawn Hunter thought a split pavilion is needed. George Kubik fel: that was all a pan of the design process. Blackhawk is not intended to take all of the pavilion capacity for the city's growth. There are, however, a limited number of parks for large group use. George polled the CCm-r.ission with results as follows: Deborah Johnson - 150 split facility; Ted Billy 250 multi-purpose; George Kubik 2_50 multi-purpose; John Griggs 200 split multi-purpose; Michael Vogel 180 split with possible sun shelters through the park for groups of 30 or so for playground users and picnickers; Shawn Hunter 250 multiple use. The averaCe figure arrived at was 210. Chairman Kubik then asked for pros and cons on the park plan itself but first requested information regarding the access from Murphy Parkway. Steve Sullivan replied that the park access is being studied to make stop sign and tee access. There is a need for a landing pad at the intersection to facilitate winter starting and s..opr ing without a slope. John Griggs wondered where the proposed shelter should be located in terms of skating on the lake. He said the Ciry might be limiting winter recreation in the park. We have elevation and hills to use for cross country skiing. sliding, walking. skating and lake skating. He reported that Lake of the Isles plowed a 2 acre area which was Used by people of all ages. We should locate the shelter for future generations. Michael Vogel shared John Griggs concern regarding the shelter building. He has not heard anything acainst the trails and would like their development first. He also would like the picnic area at the top of the hill east of the parking lot. It is critical that there be reforestation to insure privacy to the residents. John Griggs said he,too, favored adequate reforestation as planned; the parking lot off Riverton Avenue be adequate but not oversized. ADVISORY PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL RESOURCES COMMISSION MIN"UTE.S OF APRIL 4, 1991 MEETING PAGE 9 Ted Billy is for reforestation as part of staff's plan. He favored the bridge over the boardwalk but does not favor skating and relocation of the shelter building. There are too many negatives involved including the climate and the fact that encouraging skating on a lake is inviting problems in terms of safety. Deborah Johnson agrees that encouraging skating on the lake is unsafe. George Kubik summarized that eontroled traffic patterns, reforestation, trail system and bridge are acceptable. Location of park shelter and whether or not to encourage ice skating are questions to be addressed. John Griggs restated the positive and negative points from pages 38, 39 and 40 of the packet concluding with a request for clarification of ice testing location from Rich Brasch. Rich replied that be took the depth measurement on the east third of the western basin. The depth was six to seven inches. Schwartz Lake was r and Fish Lake was 18-20'. The reason for the thinner ice on Schwartz and Blackhawk might be that they handle a lot of storm water for their size. • Shawn Hunter's concerns were safety,the length of the skating season and existing,local skating provisions. John Griggs asked whether the visibility would be better at the bottom or the top of the hill. Steve Sullivan replied that as a dual function building,we should leave the building where it is because the view of the lake is better and parking access is better. Michael Vogel is in favor of putting the shelter at the bottom of the hill. It should be accessible to cross co:r,tr■ skiers for a cup of hot cider and should also be accessible to the skaters on the lake which he also favors. John Griggs is in favor of on-lake skating. In response to a question Rich Brasch replied that the issue is whether or not you can get vehicular traffic on the ice. It would be tough to get a 112 or 3/4 ton pickup on the lake to groom the skating area. George Kubik asked if this safety would be marginal. John VonDeLinde replied thai bringing equipment is critical for the safety of maintenance staff. We do not have conditions conducive to snov, removal with a Zamboni'shaver. John Griggs said he favored the shelter building at the bottom. Ted Billy verbalized that we require citizens to fence their swimming pools in their yards for safety purposes. We should. therefore, offer no skating because we cannot have an attendant on duty 16 hours a day. To put a shelter at the bottom would encourage skating. Build the shelter on the top of the hill. Deborah Johnson concurred with Ted Billy. J }- \'onDeLinde said an alternative would be to site a trailer on the lake. John Griggs stated that we not ignore the skating opportunity. George Kubik said that if there was no safety issue, a trailer could be added in the future. John Griggs asked about the parking lot size. Steve Sullivan replied the Palisade lot would have 65 stalls and the Murphy lot would have 115 spaces. Downsizing the pavilion to 210 would result in a need for 99 stalls. Regarding tree loss at the access point off Murphy Parkway, John Griggs asked how we plan to replace the trees. Steve Sullivan assured him that reforestation relates to screening and buffering and performance oriented trees rather than a 'tree for tree'. John Griggs asked further what the neighbors could expect. Steve replied that Mentor Development approved a landscape plan. The City will not be replacing with twelve inch trees, rather, standard stock will be used. More trees will be put in than were taken out George Kubik moved and Shawn Hunter seconded that the Commission recommend to the City Council the plan dated t41.11491 with the following provisions: 1. Pavilion to hold a capacity of 225 using a multiple/split design. l Agenda Information Memo May 7, 1991 City Council Meeting RECONSIDERATION/TRINITY LONE OAK CHURCH WAIVER OF DEVELOPMENT FEES B. Reconsideration, Waiver of Development Fees, Trinity Lone Oak Church Expansion/ Remodelling--Mr. Martin Schuetze, representing Trinity Lone Oak Church, is requesting a motion for reconsideration by the City Council to reconsider a request by the church to Y tY q Y waive normal development fees if the church continues to plat the property as requested by the City. It is the opinion of the church that a building permit could be issued for their expansion without the necessity of platting thus eliminating fees that are traditionally associated with the development of property. The City Attorney's office has reviewed this matter and, absent a written memo,will respond to the issue of platting at the meeting. The original request to waive fees and a sanitary sewer requirement by Trinity Lone Oak Church was considered at the December 18, 1990 City Council meeting. That information is referenced as pages 94 through 111 and is available for distribution to the City Council if so desired. For a copy of a letter sent to Mr. Schuetze by the Community Development Director, refer to page Minutes of the December 18 City Council meeting are also enclosed on page(s)l 4 • 3. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: 1) A motion to reconsider a request by Trinity Lone Oak Church to waive fees associated with the official platting of the church property and 2) if a motion to reconsider is approved, than a motion to approve or deny the request to waive certain development fees by Trinity Lone Oak Church is appropriate. ( CD N.. . r:,;A. E wit cite OF ec7Cpcin _. • 3830 PILOT KNOB ROAD THOMAS EGAN EAGAN, MINNESOTA 55122-1897 Mayor PHONE: (612)454-8100 DAVID K GUSTAFSON FAX (61A413 4 3 b, 1991 PAMELA McGREA TIM PAWLEN'Y THEODORE WACHTER Councn Members THOMAS HEDGES MR MARTIN SCHUETZE city Adm:nas[ra:or TRINITY LONE OAK CHURCH EUGENE VAN OVERBEKE Crry Clerk 2950 HWY 55 EAGAN MN 55121 RE: FINAL PLAT - TRINITY LONE OAK CHURCH Dear Martin: In the past few months, we have had several meetings regarding the need to plat Trinity Lone Oak Church. You have made your points very clear, with your own legal opinion as to why you should not be required to plat the property. Instead of arguing process and procedure, the City still feels it necessary to have the property platted and I believe that Trinity Lone Oak Church would continue to plat the property if a number of the platting fees were waived. Fees to be waived would include any fees other than direct out of pocket City costs, i.e. parks and trail dedications,water quality fees, and all trunk area assessments, except connection charges. It is the City's understanding that if these fees are waived, you will continue to prepare the final plat documents and record with the County. In our discussions, there has been a concern if platting would continue, it could delay the building permit process. It would be my intent to review this matter with the City Council and if they are in agreement with waiving the above-mentioned platting costs, you would then proceed with final platting of the property. Because of the urgency for building, staff will suggest that the building permit be issued with the understanding the church would commit to complete the plat within the next 90-120 days. If you are in agreement, we will proceed to review this letter with the City Council. If you have any questions, please advise. Sincerely, ...... cS2.„.._ Dale C. Runkle Community Development Director DCR}s THE LONE OAK TREE...THE SYMBOL OF STRENGTH AND GROWTH IN OUR COMMUNITY Equal Opportunity/A1ffirmative Action Employer °°.\ .�1. r Page 5/EAGAN CITY COUNCIL MINUTES December 18, 1990 T. Final Plat, Hoeft Addition R 90.97 It was recommended that the final plat for the Hoeft Addition be approved. • U. Final Plat, Unisys 2nd Addition R 90.98 It was recommended that the final plat for the Unysis 2nd Addition be approved. V. Agreement for Final Plat,Tranby 1st Addition It was recommended that the agreement for Final Plat of the Tranby 1st Addition be continued to the January 3, 1990, regular City Council meeting. W. Agreement. Joint Powers for Striping, Sweeping and Sealcoating It was recommended that the 1991 Joint Powers Agreement for contractual striping, sweeping and sealcoatin£ services be approved. Gustafson moved, Pawlenty seconded a motion to approve the Consent Agenda as presented with the exception of Item V, Agreement for Final Plat, Tranby 1st Addition which was continued. Aye: 5 Nay: 0 SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING Pawlenty moved, Wachter seconded a motion to set January 8, 1991 as a special City Council meeting date for the purposes of interviewing prospective candidates for the City's committees and commissions. It was recommended that the meeting begin at 5:30 p.m. Aye: 5 Nay. 0 PUBLIC HEARINGS VACATION/WINDTREE 3RD ADDITION Mayor Egan introduced this item as a vacation of a portion of drainage and utility easement (Lot 6, Block 1, Windtree 3rd Addition). City Administrator Hedges said that on September 4, 1990, the City Council had considered and denied a side yard setback variance for this parcel. He said that during the application process, it was discovered that the existing house was inadvertently located within the common lot line drainage and utility easement on the east side of the parcel. He said that the property owner had subsequently submitted a petition requesting the vacation of a portion of the side lot line drainage and utility easement. No objection has been received to this application. Mayor Egan then asked if anyone was present to address the issue. None was. McCrea moved, Gustafson seconded a motion to close the public bearing and approve the vacation of a portion of the side lot line drainage and utility easement as described as Lot 6,Block 1,Windtree 3rd Addition. Aye: 5 Na y. 0 OLD BUSINESS REQUEST TO WAIVE FEES/SANITARY SEWER REQUIREMENT TRINITY LONE OAR CHURCH After introduction by Mayor Egan, the City.Administrator said this item had been before the City Council at the last regular meeting on December 4. He said at that time, the City Council had questioned the Page 6/EAGAN CITY COUNCIL MINUTES December 18, 1990 precedence and previous actions with respect to similar uses. Those questions were researched and were part of the packet information included for Council's review. Mr.Hedges said that the Trinity Lone Oak Church had asked for a building permit for remodeling, but with the application the City had asked that the property be platted. Mr. Martin Schuetze, representing Trinity Lone Oak Church, said there were two things they wished to address with the Council: 1) the waiver of fees and 2) the sanitary sewer line extension. He said the church had reviewed a letter from the Director of Public Works regarding a possible solution to the sanitary sewer issue. Mr. Schuetze said the church had no problem with the suggested solution. Mr. Schuetze said he had met with the adjoining property owner, Mr. John Kolb, and Mr. Kolb was in no hurry to hook up to the sanitary sewer system. He said this was especially true since he has a number of barns and garages on his property and any future extension through his property could be disruptive. Director of Public Works Colbert said the property south of Trinity Lone Oak Church could be served from two different directions. He said there was no immediate need to hook up to this utility and the issue could be deferred to a later date. He said the City would ask, however, that the church provide an easement for the installation of a future utility line to this property. Mr.Colbert said that the proposed agreement used for Trinity Lone Oak Church would be similar to an agreement developed with the Advent Church and would indicate that if the sewer had to be installed at a later date through the Trinity Lone Oak property, the easement would have been dedicated as a condition of the plat. He said that the cost of the sanitary sewer could then be spread as an assessment against the property to minimize the immediate financial impact to the church. Mayor Egan noted that the City had frequently waived the parkland dedication fee. He said the agreement outlined by Director of Public Works Colbert seemed to be a reasonable solution considering there was a precedence for it and the fact that Trinity Lone Oak Church was one of the oldest existing facilities in the City. Councilmember Wachter said that he agreed it was an appropriate handling of this item as it was similar to what had been done for other churches. Wachter moved, McCrea seconded a motion: 1) to approve a request from Trinity Lone Oak Church to waive the park dedication fee and the wafer quality fee and 2) to approve a waiver of Condition 6 of the preliminary plat relative to extension of the sanitary sewer service provided such service is guaranteed through the dedication of a utility easement. Councilmember Pawlenty acknowledged that the sanitary sewer issue appeared to be resolved and the park dedication fee waived but questionP..l whether the other fees requested were also waived. Councilmember Gustafson said he understood that the park fee was waived, the sanitary sewer line deferred with a stipulation that an agreement would be drafted and payment of the extension would be made at the appropriate time and that all other fees would be paid. Martin Schuetze disagreed saying that in addition to those items addressed, the church was still contesting the trail dedication fee,the water quality fee and the final plat escrow. Councilmember Pawlenty said that the church had attempted to make the case that since they were not a subdivider, they should be exempt from all development fees. He asked Director of Community Development Runkle if, for instance, the Trail Dedication ordinance applied only to subdivisions. Mr. Runkle said that the Trail Dedication policy had only come on line in the last six months and had been applied to subdivisions on a per lot basis. The Councilmember then asked City Attorney Sheldon the definition of a "subdivider." Mr. Sheldon said it was a generic term for a person who plats property. \ -\ .• Page 7/EAGAN CITY COUNCIL MINUTES December 18, 1990 Mr. Schuetze said that the fees being charged the Trinity Lone Oak Church are just over 516,000. He said they were not contesting all of the fees but were opposed to paying the trail dedication fee,the water quality fee and the final plat escrow. Mr. Schuetze said to put the fees in perspective, the fees would be $16,000 even if the church was building a S50,000 addition. He said that a subdivider could pass the costs along to the buyer and a corporation could pass these costs on to the consumer through higher prices or receive a deduction in the fees through depreciation. He said that the church is exempt from most taxes and he contended the fees that they were contesting are user fees or fees that are like a 'tax.' In addition, Mr. Schuetze said the church had no need for a trail system on their property. He said the church was requesting a waiver of these fees because: 1) there was strong public policy and support of the waiver,2)Trinity Lone Oak Church is not a subdivider and 3) the substantial amount of money being spent on the remodelling in order to retain its historic flavor. Councilmember Wachter suggested the possibility of waiving the water quality fee because it was instituted after the initial application by Trinity Lone Oak Church. Councilmember McCrea said that she would support that action but was concerned that any other non-profit organization be treated accordingly as she wanted all public policy to be applied equitably. Councilmember Wachter said his reasoning for the waiver was only one of the timing of the application. In response to Mr. Schuetze's questioning the justification for such fees, Mayor Fagan said there were a number of charges that the City had to be able to justify and said he believed the City was very well reasoned in that process. As regards the trail dedication fee, Mayor Egan said it was the City's determination that the church and the school campus would have use for trails on the property. He said the City had to be reasonable but it also had to be consistent. For Council's consideration, Councilmember Pawlenty said he had been contacted by a member of Trinity Lone Oak Church who said they spoke on behalf of eight other members. The person who contacted Councilmember Pawlenty wished to remain anonymous but it was their opinion that the church should not be asking for a waiver of the fees but should pay its fair share. City Administrator Hedges said the point had been made in the past that fees such as those being discussed were actually a 'tax" for service. He said it was, however, an expansion of an existing system and no matter what the service, it placed an additional burden on that system. Additionally,City Administrator Hedges said that if Trinity Lone Oak has cash flow problems, they may wish to consider spreading the fees as an assessment over a period of time. Councilmember Gustafson then asked the City Attorney if the assessment of these fees could be interpreted as the levying of taxes against a church? City Attorney said that the charges are absolutely legitimate based on Minnesota State Statutes which refer to the subdivision regulations that the City has established in connection with State law. He said these fees are not'taxes'but in fact charges that supplement the system and provide for those items. He said the City would have no difficulty in justifying these fees. Councilmember Gustafson then said that it had been suggested that the City consider waiving the water quality fee because adoption of the fee may have come after Trinity Lone Oak Church's application. The Councilmember said that if this was done, all other applicants should receive the same consideration. He then asked staff how many others could be waived for the same reason? Director of Community Development Runkle said that the City looks at these fees at the time of final plat when they are typically calculated and charged. He said if staff knows that an ordinance is coming in or to be changed, they inform the applicant of the potential change. The Councilmember said then anything in effect before final plat would normally be charged with the application. Mr.Runkle said there was one exception having to do with preliminary plat procedures that does not allow new conditions to be imposed after the preliminary plat was approved. He said if a fee were instituted after a preliminary plat was approved, it could not be added as a condition. Councilmember Gustafson then asked the applicant if they were subdividing their property or had applied only for a building permit. Martin Schuetze said that they had applied for a building permit and were informed at that time that they would have to have the 2� Page 8/EAGAN CTTY COUNCIL MINUTES December 18, 1990 property platted. He said because they platted the property they became subdividers and subject to the respective fees. In answer to a question from Mayor Egan, Councilmember Wachter said his motion had included a waiver of the water quality fees. Director of Public Works Colbert, asking for clarification, said if the motion passed, it was his understanding that it would require a special agreement for the future sanitary sewer installation, the dedication of an easement over the property, and a trail dedication fee but would waive the park dedication and water quality fees. Councilmember Wachter said that it was an accurate clarification of his motion. Mr. Colbert then said the agreement would become an exhibit to the development agreement and become a recordable document. Councilmember McCrea said that if waiver of the water quality fee was to be part of the motion, she would withdraw her second. She said she was doing so because she was concerned about the equitable implementation of the fees. Because he spoke in favor of the motion, Mayor Egan said he would second it. Wachter moved, Egan seconded a motion: 1) to a pp rove a request est from Trinity Lone Oak Church to waive the park dedication fee and the water quality fee and 2) to approve a waiver of Condition 6 of the preliminary plat relative to extension of the sanitary sewer service provided such service is guaranteed through the dedication of a utility easement. Mr. Eldon Morrison, the architect for Trinity Lone Oak Church said that he questioned the necessity of a final plat. Director of Community Development Runkle said that it has been a policy of the City with expansions and rem odellings to use that opportunity to update the legal description as well as bring the property up to current development standards. Councilmember Pawlenty said he agreed with much that had been said, however,he too was concerned about the consistency of applying the water quality fee. He said the water quality fee was instituted to protect water quality by attempting to deal with the runoff from buildings or parking lots in the City. He said that rationale would apply to church buildings and parking lots as well as any other type. Councilmember Pawlenty said that he respected the viewpoint that this was one of Eagan's oldest landmarks, however, on balance, he would oppose the motion as it was currently structured. Mayor Egan then called the vote. Aye: 2 Nay: 3 (Gustafson, McCrea, Pawlenty) Gustafson moved, McCrea seconded a motion: 1) to approve a request from Trinity Lone Oak Church to waive the park dedication fee, 2) to approve a waiver of Condition 6 of the preliminary plat relative to extension of the sanitary sewer service provided such service is guaranteed through the dedication of a utility easement and 3) that all other fees shail be paid. Councilmember McCrea said that she would consider rebating a portion of the water quality fee to Trinity Lone Oak Church if the Council studied the issue regarding the equitable handling of the fee. Aye: 5, Nay: 0 COMPREHENSIVE GUIDE PLAN AMENDMENT/REZONING MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL LAND STUDY,AREA D Mayor Egan introduced this item as a comprehensive guide plan amendment, City of Eagan, Area D, multi-family residential land study, to change the land use designation of approximately nine acres from D-]II mixed residential (6 - 12 units per acre) to D-I single family residential (0 3 units per acre) and the rezoning \TD--k Agenda Information Memo May 7, 1991 City Council Meeting AMENDMENT/CHAPTER 11 PAWN SHOPS C. Amendment, City of Eagan, to City Code Chapter 11, Land Use Regulations (Zoning), to Allow Pawn Shops as a Permitted Use in Retail/Commercial Zoning Districts--At the April 23 Advisory Planning Commission meeting, an amendment to the zoning code regarding location of pawn shops was approved. At the March meeting, the legal notice called for pawn shops to be a permitted use in CSC districts only. According to the City Planner, the Commission felt that a CSC district is too restrictive and Community Development Department staff was directed to prepare a legal notice that would include all retail districts with the understanding that the Commission could be more restrictive than what the legal notice called for. After approximately 45 minutes of debate at the April 23 meeting, a motion to allow pawn shops as a conditional use in GB districts failed on a 3 to 2 vote. A second motion to allow pawn shops as a permitted use in a CSC district and as a conditional use in the GB districts passed 4 to 1. Planned development districts were excluded in both motions. Mr. Brad Rixmann was in attendance at both Advisory Planning Commission meetings and the property he owns along the west side of Cedarview Drive would be acceptable in the general conditional use permit for a GB district, according to the City Planner. Enclosed on pages\through 0...((is a copy of minutes of the April 23 APC meeting and • ordinance as revised by the City Attorney's office. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny an amendment to the zoning code regarding pawn shops as a permitted use in certain commercial zoning classifications, as recommended by the Advisory Planning Commission, to allow them as a permitted use in CSC districts and as a conditional use in the GB districts. 2 L MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE EAGAN ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION EAGAN, MINNESOTA APRIL 23, 1991 A regular meeting of the Eagan Advisory Planning Commission was held on Tuesday, April 23 , 1991, at 7: 00 p.m. at the Eagan Municipal Center. Present were members Miller, Graves, Merkley, Trygg, and Hoeft. Also present were City Planner Jim Sturm, Assistant City Engineer Mike Foertsch, Community Development Director Dale Runkle and City Attorney Mike Dougherty. MINUTES March 28 , 1991 . Merkley moved, Miller seconded, the motion to approve the March 28 , 1991 Advisory Planning Commission minutes as presented. All voted in favor. AGENDA Chairman Graves recognized that item "D" is continued until the next planning commission meeting. Merkley moved, Miller seconded, the motion to approve the agenda as amended. All voted in favor. Chairman Graves explained the Advisory Planning Commission procedure to the public. AMENDMENT TO CHAPTER 11, LAND USE REGULATIONS - CITY OF EAGAN Chairman Graves opened the first public hearing of the evening regarding an amendment to the Eagan City Code, Chapter 11, Land Use Regulations (Zoning) to allow pawn shops as a permitted use in retail/commercial zoning districts. City Planner Jim Sturm presented a brief summary of the Pawn Shop Ordinance. He explained that the legal notice for the first public hearing only called for Community Shopping Center districts. The commission members directed staff to prepare a legal notice containing other retail districts such as General Business and Neighborhood Business. He also noted that Superior Paint and Collision sent a letter to the City stating their opposition to pawn shops. Brad Rixmann who owns property at 3935 Cedarview Drive informed the commission members that he would like to start a pawn shop in the Cedarvale mall area. He has talked to the surrounding businesses and Page 2/EAGAN ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES APRIL 23 , 1991 • they have no problem with this and in fact support him. He would like to see pawn shops allowed in General Business districts. Chairman Graves felt that the biggest concern was the outdoor storage. Commission Member Merkley stated that he thought pawn shop locations should be either Community Shopping Districts or General Business. He is strongly against outside storage and would like to see a condition added for no storage if pawn shops are allowed in General Business. Commission Member Miller remarked that pawn shops are similar to other retail businesses and should be treated like one. Commission Member Hoeft concurred with Commission Member Merkley. Chairman Graves stated that neighborhood business is not appropriate. A discussion occurred regarding the other alternatives. Trygg moved, Hoeft seconded, motion to amend the Eagan City Code, Chapter 11 , Land Use Regulations (Zoning) to allow pawn shops as a conditional use in General Business districts. Chairman Graves and Commission Member Miller felt that the motion should also allow pawn shops as a permitted use in Community Shopping Center districts. Trygg and Hoeft voted in favor; Graves, Miller and Merkley voted against the motion. The motion failed 3-2 . Miller moved, Merkley seconded, motion to amend the Eagan City Code, Chapter 11 , Land Use Regulations (Zoning) to allow pawn shops as a conditional use in General Business districts and as a permitted use in Community Shopping Center districts. All favored, except Trygg who opposed. COMPREHENSIVE GUIDE PLAN AMENDMENT REVISING THE PUBLIC UTILITIES ELEMENT - CITY OF EAGAN Chairman Graves opened the next public hearing of the evening regarding a Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment to the public utilities element which updates the public utilities element to as Agenda Information Memo May 7, 1991 City Council Meeting CONSIDERATION/SENECA PLANT DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT REVISION TO SCHEDULE D. Consideration of Seneca Plant Development Agreement -Proposed Revision to Schedule Regarding Incinerator Odor Control Improvements—Since the April 16 City Council meeting City staff and the City Attorney's office have met with representatives of the MWCC staff to further discuss their notification to the City that odor control equipment will be delayed beyond the October 1991 date as agreed to in a development agreement executed by the MWCC and the City. Mayor Egan, City Administrator Hedges, Community Development Director Runkle, Senior Planner Kristy Marnin, Jim Sheldon and Mike Dougherty from the City Attorney's office met with the City's Metropolitan Council representative Margaret Schreiner and MWCC Commissioner Bruce Baumann on Friday, April 19 and discussed issues that were raised by the neighborhood at the April 16 City Council meeting, and concluded that a meeting with the MWCC chair, Mr. Charlie Weaver,would be appropriate to further discuss these issues. A meeting was scheduled for Monday, April 29 at which time the same aforementioned elected and appointed officials met with Charlie Weaver, Chairperson of the MWCC discuss concerns about the delay proposed for the installation of odor control equipment for the Seneca expansion project. Mayor Egan gave an excellent summary and stated the issues that are before the community regarding the delay on behalf of the City Council. After a lengthy discussion with Mr. Weaver and a thorough understanding of the facts regarding a commitment that was made in the development agreement to fulfill installation of the odor control equipment this fall, Mr. Weaver committed to further review with the MWCC staff to explore various options and respond to Mayor Egan no later than Wednesday, May 1. To date the City has not received a written response to include in the Council packet. The City did receive notice on Thursday, May 2 that a letter would be forthcoming from legal counsel for the MWCC and delivered to the City no later than Tuesday, May 7 for City Council consideration. For additional information on this itegi, refer to a memo from the City Attorney's office enclosed on pages\�,(o through I ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To address the intentions of the MWCC and respond with the appropriate action which could range from an acceptance to their proposed delay to declaring the development agreement in default and proceeding with the necessary legal action. 1 M E M O R A N D U M TO: Mr. Thomas Hedges, City Administrator FROM: Mr. Michael G. Dougherty, City Attorney DATE: May 2 , 1991 RE: Seneca Waste Water Treatment Plant - Default Notice Our File No. 206-9257 Today I spoke with Jeanne Matross, General Counsel for the MWCC, concerning the acceleration of delivery dates for equipment and the scheduling of a representatives' meeting between the City and the Commission. Additionally, I have attached a copy of a letter addressed to me from Jeanne Matross dated April 29, 1991. Ms. Matross has indicated that the MWCC has received the information requested from Von Roll, the manufacturer's rep for the afterburners, scrubbers, etc. , that the information is now being analyzed by the Waste Control Commission and HDR as to its feasibility and implementation. Ms. Matross indicated that she would forward a letter to the City Council prior to the meeting of May 7 , 1991 to update the City with respect to their findings. Additionally, as the MWCC and HDR are able to focus on the accelerated schedule, Ms. Matross has indicated that she will designate a date certain upon which discussions can begin between the MWCC and the City with respect to the extension of the Development Agreement and any conditions to be attached. Again, it is my understanding that this date will be forwarded to the City prior to its meeting on May 7 , 1991. If you have any questions or concerns regarding these matters, please be in contact with me. MGD/djk Enclosure �-CP Z Metropolitan Waste Control Commission Mears Park Centre, 230 East Fifth Street, St. Paul, Minnesota 55101 612 222-8423 April 29 , 1991 Mr. Michael Dougherty Severson, Wilcox & Sheldon, P.A. 600 Midway National Bank Building 7300 West 147th Street Apple Valley, MN 55124 Re: Eagan/MWCC Development Agreement dated March 2 , 1989 Dear Mr. Dougherty: In response to your letter dated April 9 , 1991 the Commission will certainly work with the City of Eagan to reach a mutually acceptable amendment to the March 2 , 1989 Development Agreement related to the date for installation of incinerator odor control equipment. On April 10 , 1991 Commission staff met with Von Roll, the manufacturer ' s representative for the after burners, scrubbers, after coolers and induced draft fan to discuss the earliest date by which Von Roll could manufacturer and deliver the equipment. As you know, the representative stated that he needed two to three weeks from the date of the meeting to make that determination. As was pointed out in the HDR Design Report transmitted to the City in March 1990 and as we stated in our March 5, 1991 letter to the City, the Commission has proposed an amendment to the Development Agreement because design and construction of the incinerator and sludge processing project as two separate projects has presented unacceptable and previously unforeseen construction coordination problems which impact the entire plant expansion project. In addition, the amendment to the Development Agreement is being proposed by the Commission to allow it to incorporate recent improvements into the design of the incineration and sludge processing equipment. The Commission believes that incorporation of the recently improved design will be to the long-term benefit of the City of Eagan as well as the other communities served by the Seneca Plant expansion. Finally, I note your letter states that the Commission is in breach of the Development Agreement in not meeting the October 1 , 1991 date for installation of incinerator odor control equipment. Obviously a variation from that date, if any occurs, will not occur until October 1 and the Commission, of course, reserves any Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer ,-,' "-,1) "art. Mr. Michael Dougherty April 29 , 1991 Page 2 rights it may have under the agreement including, but not limited to, the force majeure provisions. Sincerely, ' \ ' Jeanne K. Matross r . lsC !� Associate General Counsel JKM: am CC: Gordon 0. Voss Thomas Hedges Charles Weaver Thomas Egan Bruce Baumann Margaret Schreiner Craig Morris \::;6 Agenda Information Memo May 7, 1991 City Council Meeting ORDINANCE/TOBACCO PRODUCTS E. Ordinance Amendment, City of Eagan, Amending Eagan City Code Chapter 6, Entitled "Other Business Regulations and Licensing," by Amending Section 6.34 Regarding Tobacco Products; and by Adopting by Reference Eagan City Code Chapter 1 and Section 6.99--At the request of the City Council an ordinance was prepared that makes the sale of tobacco products unlawful if they are sold or dispensed through the use of a vending machine or offered for sale by the means of self service merchandizing. Also at the request of the City Council all current cigarette license holders were notified of the May 7 meeting and many are planning to be in attendance. Enclosed on pages \3Dthrough I32.-for City Council review is a copy of the ordinance as prepared by the City Clerk and City Attorney's office. Also enclosed on page($3 is a list of cigarette license holders. Members of the City Council have been contacted requesting a continuance of this agenda item. Unfortunately, notices have been sent out to all cigarette license holders and the item was published as a formal agenda item in the local newspaper. Since there are many interests and a variety of license holders, the City Council may want to deliberate briefly on the item and consider a continuance to allow time on a future agenda for formal testimony as requested. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the ordinance that amends Section 6.34 regarding tobacco or consider a continuance to a future City Council meeting as requested by the Grocers Association. \0-9 ORDINANCE NO. 2ND SERIES AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EAGAN, MINNESOTA, AMENDING EAGAN CITY CODE CHAPTER 6 ENTITLED "OTHER BUSINESS REGULATIONS AND LICENSING" BY AMENDING SECTION 6. 34 REGARDING TOBACCO; AND BY ADOPTING BY REFERENCE EAGAN CITY CODE CHAPTER 1 AND SECTION 6.99. The City Council of the City of Eagan does ordain: Section 1. Eagan City Code Chapter 6 is hereby amended by changing Sec. 6. 34 to read as follows: Subd. 1. For purpose of this ordinance, the following words and phrases shall have the meanings respectively ascribed to them in this section: A. "Tobacco Products" means cigarettes; cigars; cheroots; stoggies; perique; granulated, plug-cut, crimp-cut, ready rubbed and other smoking tobacco; snuff; snuff flowers; cavendish; plug and twist tobacco, fine-cut and other chewing tobaccos; shorts; refuse scraps, clippings, cuttings and sweepings of tobacco and other kinds and forms of tobacco, prepared in such a manner as to be suitable for chewing or smoking in a pipe or other tobacco related devices; and cigarette papers and wrappers. For purposes of this section, a tobacco product includes both individually packaged items such as a pack of cigarettes or a can of chewing tobacco, and cartons containing two or more individually wrapped tobacco products. B. "Self-Service Merchandising" means open display of tobacco products that the public has access to without the intervention of an employee. C. "Vending Machine" means any mechanical, electric or electronic device, appliance or any other medium or object designated or used for vending purposes which, upon insertion of money, tokens or any other form of payment, dispenses tobacco products. Subd. 2 . License Required. Any person who, directly or indirectly, keeps for retail sale, sells at retail, or otherwise disposes of any tobacco, must first obtain a license from the City. The City Council is the grantor. tr7) Subd. 3. Conditions of License. A. Separate licenses shall be issued for the sale of tobacco at each fixed place of business, and no license shall be issued for a movable place of business. B. The following acts or conduct on premises licensed under this ordinance are unlawful and shall be punished as provided by Section 6. 99 hereof and shall be grounds for revocation or suspension of any license as provided by Subdivision 4 of this Section hereof: 1. To sell, offer for sale, give away or deliver any t obacco roduct to any person under the age of P Y P g eighteen (18) years. 2 . To sell or dispense any tobacco products through the use of a vending machine. 3 . To offer for sale any tobacco product by the means of a self-service merchandising. 4 . To keep for sale, sell or dispose of any tobacco in any form containing opium, morphine, jusim weed, belladonna, strychnos, cocaine, marijuana, or any other deleterious or poisonous drug except nicotine. Subd. 4 . Suspension or Revocation. A. A licensee's authority to sell cigarettes at a specific location will be suspended for thirty (30) days if licensee is found to have acted as prohibited in Subdivision 3 (B) (1) -(4) in this Section hereof. B. A six (6) month suspension shall be imposed for a second violation at the same location occurring within a twelve (12) month period. C. In the case of suspension, there shall be no license refund. D. License revocation may be instituted following a criminal conviction under this Section of any officer, director, manager, or other agent or employee of any licensee. Section 2 . Eagan City Code Chapter 1 entitled "General Provisions and Definitions Applicable to the Entire City Code Including 'Penalty for Violation' " and Section 6. 99, entitled "Violation a Misdemeanor" are 15 'V • hereby adopted in their entirety by reference as though repeated verbatim. Section 3 . Effective Date. This ordinance shall take effect upon its adoption and publication according to law. ATTEST: CITY OF EAGAN City Council By: E. J. VanOverbeke By: Thomas A. Egan Its: Clerk Its: Mayor Date Ordinance Adopted: Date Ordinance Published in the Legal Newspaper: CITY OF EAGAN January 1, 1991 - June 30, 1991 1991 CIGARETTE LICENSE RENEWALS # OF OVER LIC. # LOCATION VENDOR MACH. COUNTEF 2319 AMERICAN FRUIT & PRODUCE MN VIKINGS FOOD SERVICE 1 2348 BROOKS SUPERETTE #43 GATEWAY FOODS OF MPLS 1 2333 BROWN TANK NORTH COUNTRY VENDING 1 2313 CEDAR CLIFF AMOCO ROBERT SCHLANGEN 1 2314 CEDARVALE LANES DVM, INC. 2 2346 CEDARVALE TIRE & AUTO A & K SINCLAIR 1 A 3s7: CHEERS WINE & SPIRITS DANIEL HERBST 1 2349 COMPRI HOTEL THEISEN VENDING 1 2347 CUB FOODS SUPER VALU STORES, INC. 1 2345 DIAMOND T RANCH JERRY THOMAS 1 2 :37 DUCKWOOD 66 PHILLIPS 66 CO. 1 2341 DURNINGS DOROLA INC. DBA 1 2342 EAGAN E-Z STOP CROWN COCO INC. 1 2323 EAGAN AMOCO SO. FRANCE LTD. INC. 1 2338-40FINASERVE #590, 576, 594 FINASERVE, INC. 3 2310, 11HOLIDAY STATION STORE #234 , #247 HOLIDAY STATION STORES 2 2318 LANXANG ORIENTAL GROCERY THANOM KEOHAUONG 1 2312 LIQUOR SHOPPE LIQUOR SHOPPE 1 2334 LOST SPUR COUNTRY CLUB HAROLD F. AWE CO. , INC. 2 2330 MISTER DONUT MISTER DONUT 1 2316, 17PDQ #214 , 287 PDQ 2 2324 RAINBOW FOODS APPLEBAUM FOOD MARKETS 1 2343 , 44SNYDER DRUG STORE #32 ,#61 SNYDER DRUG STORE 2 2336 STARKS SALOON GARY STARK 2 2320, 1, 2SUPERAMERICA #4049 , 4182 ,4335 SUPERAMERICA 3 2331 TARGET T-360 TARGET 1 2335 TEXACO SUPER STORE YOCUM OIL COMPANY 1 2327 , 8, 9TOM THUMB #166, 259 , 273 TOM THUMB 3 2332 TOTAL PETROLEUM TOTAL PETROLEUM 1 2315 VALLEY LOUNGE DVM, INC. 2 2326 WALGREENS WALGREENS 1 2325 YANKEE SQUARE AMOCO W. J. RABUSE 1 3 3 Agenda Information Memo May 7, 1991 City Council Meeting SIGN ORDINANCE F. Ordinance Amendment, City of Eagan,Amending Eagan City Code Chapter 4, Entitled "Construction Licensing, Permits and Regulations, Including Signs, Excavations, and Mobile Home Parks" by Amending Section 4.20 Regarding Placement, Erection and Maintenance of Signs,and Adopting by Reference Eagan City Code Chapter 1 and Sec 4.99- The City was contacted prior to publication of the agenda by Naegele Advertising requesting a continuance of the ordinance amendment to City Code Chapter 4, amending Section 4.20 regarding sign regulations. The request for a continuance is to the Thursday, May 23, 1991 regular Council meeting. For City Council information, a copy of con spondence from Dakota Inc., and Naegele Outdoor Advertising are enclosed on pages 3' and t3 t. Also a copy of the propos d rdinance as revised and prepared by the City Attorney's office is enclosed on pages through ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny a continuance of the ordinance amendment to Section 4.20 regarding placement, erection and maintenance of signs to the Thursday, May 23, 1991 City Council agenda. l3 (( - DAkOTA Assrs;mg the comma;^rte and people challenged by drsabdrnes .� ��' u' to irve a,d work together L Board ot Directors April 29, 1991 Barbara KdbourneiChairman Kathteen Jeftersonaecretary Leslie Bdulk Arnold Patty Johnson Kenneth Bterk y Thomas Cowley Naegele Outdoor Advertising Inc. Harm,Halvorson Paul Hauge 1700 West 78th Street Thomas Hunt - Minneapolis, Minnesota 55423-3899 Stan Krinsky George Moudry Stepney.Rogness Susan Sisole Janice Smith Sonsteng Dear Patty, Wriharn Wray I am writing to give Naegele Outdoor Advertising my support Community Resource Committee as the City of Eagan discusses billboards on city roads. Duane Harves Howard Knutson Dakota , Inc. is a private, nonprofit organization serving William Newberg people with developmental disabilities in Dakota and Hennepin GaienPate Counties. Last year, Dakota, Inc. and 78 sponsoring businesses Paimei Peterson Jane VanRoerel rd.o and service clubs held a two-day family festival in August. Gwen Wearer Ray wheeler The Dakota Funfest was a fund raiser for Dakota's services, but Albert Woodward more importantly, a celebration of what people with disabilities are doing in the workforce. Eagan's Park and Recreation Department was a great help to us in planning the GecraeA M_Jo'y. tJ,SV;_fl.A fest1va1. Da,ora.lnc rsaprF:ate Naegele's public service outdoor advertising was one of the non pro','corpora'c- most effective means we had of letting the community know about the Funfest. We definitely plan more billboards for the second annual festival this September. We hope to buy space on billboards on Highway 13 in Eagan. I applaud the Eagan City Council for their efforts to keep the city an attractive place to live and do business, but hope they will decide to allow at least some outdoor advertising. Sincerely, DAKOTA, INC. tt( Mary Hass'ng Director of Development 13C Naegele . Outdoor Advertrsirg,Inc. TWIN CITIES Michael W. Cronin D I R I C T O R OF C O R P O R S I F DEN E L O P M E N T May 1, 1991 Mr. Dale Runkle City of Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55122 Dear Dale, Thanks for taking time to meet with Tom Klees and I yesterday. This will confirm our request the City Council postpone or continue its hearing and consideration of the changes to the sign ordinance at their May 7, 1991 meeting. Our general manager and real estate manager, both Eagan residents, would like to provide testimony. Unfortunately both will be out of town on Company business that day. Thank you for your willingness to assist in arranging this. We will have an updated map of our understanding of the potential billboard locations to you for your review and concurrence soon. I have also enclosed a letter we received from Mary Hassing of Dakota, Inc. We appreciate her comments and would like to work with you and the Council to define a compatible and stable place for us to continue to be part of Eagan. Sincerel , Michael Cronin 1700 West 78th Street • Minneapolis. MN 55423-3899 • 612-869-1900 Fax: 612 869-7082 (_ W MEMO TO: TOM HEDGES, CITY ADMINISTRATOR FROM: DALE RUNKLE, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR • DATE: MAY 2, 1991 SUBJECT: REVISED SIGN ORDINANCE Please find attached to this memo the revisions in the sign ordinance which were requested. It is my understanding that the sign ordinance will be continued to the May 21 meeting for consideration; however, if we can get copies to the City Council with their May 7 packet, it will give them additional time to review the ordinance in detail. If you have any questions or changes or would like further explanation, please contact me. Community Development Director DR/mg ORDINANCE NO. 2ND SERIES AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EAGAN, MINNESOTA, AMENDING EAGAN CITY CODE CHAPTER 4 ENTITLED "CONSTRUCTION LICENSES, PERMITS AND REGULATION, INCLUDING SIGNS, EXCAVATIONS AND MOBILE HOME PARKS" BY AMENDING SECTION 4 . 20 REGARDING PLACEMENT, ERECTION AND MAINTENANCE OF SIGNS; AND BY ADOPTING BY REFERENCE EAGAN CITY CODE CHAPTER 1 AND SECTION 4 . 99 . WHEREAS, the City of Eagan is concerned about preserving its aesthetic appeal and about the health, safety and welfare of its residents; and WHEREAS , in recent years the City has been concerned about the design of freeway landscaping standards; and WHEREAS, in recent years the City has authorized the implementation of the design of landscaping for City streets ; and WHEREAS , the City has undertaken the review of its ordinance which regulates signs to provide for the preservation of the welfare of the City and to protect the safety of its residents. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Eagan does ordain: Section 1 . Eagan City Code Chapter 4 is hereby amended by changing Section 4 . 20 , subds. 1 through 10, to read as follows: Subd. 1 . Purpose, Construction and Definitions. A. Purpose. The purpose of this Section shall be to regulate the placement, erection and maintenance of signs in the City so as to promote the health, safety and general welfare of the residents of the City. B. Construction. All terms and words used in this Section shall be given their common sense meaning considered in context, except as hereinafter specifically defined. C. Definitions. 1. "Ground Level" - Point of reference for measurement purposes being the top of the curb of the treet adjacent to the location of a sign. � 5 2 2 . "Ground Signs" - A sign erected on free-standing shafts, posts or walls which are solidly affixed to the ground and completely independent of any building or other structure. Any ground sign which projects more than seven feet above ground level is considered a pylon sign. 3 . "Pylon Sign" - A sign erected on free-standing shafts, posts or walls which are solidly affixed to the ground, and which projects more than seven feet above ground level, and which has a maximum height of twenty (20) feet. 4 . "Sign" - Any surface, facing or object upon which there is printed, painted or artistic matter, design or lighting. 5 . "Sign Area" - The gross area, exclusive of supportive frame, which contains copy or identifying features such as a Logo, character or identifying figure. The gross area shall be calculated as an enclosed area bounded by no more than twelve (12) straight lines. 6 . "Sign Height" - The distance from ground level to the highest point on the sign. Subd. 2 . General Sign Standards. A. Obstruction of Vision. No signs shall be erected or maintained in such place and manner as obstructs driver vision, or is noxious , annoying or hazardous because of method of lighting, illumination, reflection or location. B. Location to Property Line. No ortion of an sign . .post or canopy shall be located closer than ten feet from any property, right-of-way or dividing line. C. Location to Street, Highway or Railroad Right-of-Way. No sign shall be located closer than ten feet from any street, highway or railroad right-of-way. D. Moving Parts or Lights. No signs are allowed which contain moving sections or intermittent or flashing lights, except for intermittent display of time and temperature. E. Source of Lighting. No signs are permitted for which the source of light is directly visible to passing pedestrians or vehicle traffic. F. Painted Signs on Buildings. No signs are allowed which are painted directly upon the wall of a building. 1 ))°\ G. Construction and Erection of Signs. All signs shall be constructed and erected in quality manner of sound and sufficient materials so as to ensure the safety of the public and in accordance with all reasonable standards employed by professional sign makers. H. No sign, except as provided in Subd. 4 . (A) or Subd. 5. (b) , shall project higher than one (1) story or fifteen (15) feet above the curb level, whichever is lower. Subd. 3 . Permitted Uses. A. Political Campaign Signs. Political campaign signs are authorized in all districts. Subsection (A) shall not be construed as authorizing any such signs on public property or on private property where otherwise prohibited. B. Location of Signs. Signs are permitted on property zoned Business, Industrial, Agricultural, Public Facilities, R & D or PD (encompassing these zones) . Except as otherwise provided in ,Subd. 4 . (c) or Subd. 5. (b) , signs shall not exceed fifty (50) square feet in area. C. Location of Signs in Residential Areas. Signs in Residentially zoned areas or areas of PD designation for residential use only are permitted under the following cases: 1 . On any lot containing less than twenty thousand (20, 000) square feet in area, one (1) ground sign per lot which sign shall not exceed sixteen (16) square feet in area. 2 . On any lot containing twenty thousand (20, 000) square feet, or more, in area, one (1) ground sign per lot which sign shall not exceed thirty-two (32) square feet in area. 3 . Ground signs identifying major apartment complexes or residential subdivisions which sign shall not exceed fifty (50) square feet in area. Subd. 4 . Building Mounted Signs, Standards. A. Number Permitted. No more than one sign for each street frontage of a lot containing a one- or two-story building shall be permitted on a building for each entity located within such building. Any building in excess of two stories shall be permitted no more than one sign for each street frontage of the lot upon which the building is located. tLk B. Design Similarity. All signs mounted on a building shall be similar in design .t.o each other. C. Sign Area. The total area of all signs/�mounted upon a side of a building shall not cover in excess -of 20% of the gross area ofik the side ,of the building upon which the sign is located. D. Sign Projection. No sign mounted upon a building is allowed to project more than eighteen inches from the vertical surface of the building. E. Roof Signs. No sign mounted upon a building is allowed to project above the highest outside wall or parapet wall. Subd. 5. Ground and Pylon Signs, Standards. A. Ground Signs. Up to one ground sign shall be allowed for each street frontage of a lot. Such signs shall be limited to seven feet total height, with a four foot maximum height of sign area. B. Pylon Signs. Up to one pylon sign shall be allowed per lot. When used, a pylon sign shall be i.: lieu of a ground sign. No pylon sign may be located closer than 100 feet from any other pylon sign, measured on the same side of the street. No pylon signs shall project more than 20 feet above the ground level of the lot. No pylon sign shall exceed 125 square feet in area per side. No pylon sign shall exceed two sides. C. Freeway Locations. An on-premise pylon sign for identification purposes is allowed for a property located directly adjacent to a freeway within the City. Any property owner that acquires a permit to erect a pylon sign for visibility from the freeway shall be allowe only one ground sign to be located on the side of the propert' opposite of the freeway. All signs must comply in all other respects with the pr- visions of this Section. A freeway shall ' e defined as a pr ;cipal arterial as defined in the Comprehensive Plan. Subd. 6. Nameplates. No more than one (1) nameplate for each dwelling unit shall .be permitted. The nameplate shall not exceed one (1) square foot in area and shall solely indicate the name and address of the occupant or a permitted occupation. Subd. 7 . Parking Areas, Standards. Signs designating parking area entrances or exits are limited to one sign for each exit or entrance, and to a maximum size of two (2) square feet each. One sign per parking area designating the conditions of use or identity of such parking area and conditions of use or identity of such parking area and limited to a maximum size of nine (9) square feet, shall be permitted. No parking area sign shall project more than five (5) feet above ground level. Subd. 8 . Political Campaign Signs, Standards. No license or permit shall be required for the placing of temporary political campaign signs not more than thirty-two (32) square feet in area where the placing of such signs is authorized byAthis ordinance. h Campaiqn signs ma be •osted from Au•ust in a state •eneral • ninet 90 da s •rior to an other election a^, nd shall be removed withinhten (10) days ,following the election. Subd. 9 . Non-Conforming Signs. A. The Protective Inspections Department shall order the removal of any sign erected or maintained in violation of the law as it existed prior to the date of adoption of this Section. Removal shall be in accordance with Subdivision 11. B. Any non-conforming temporary or portable sign existing at the time of adoption of this Section shall be made to comply with the requirements set forth herein or shall be removed within sixty (60) days after the adoption of this Section. C. Other signs existing at the time of the enactment of this Section and not conforming to its provisions, but which did conform to previous laws shall be regarded as non-conforming signs which may be continued if properly repaired and maintained as provided in this Section and if in conformance with other provisions of the City Code. If said signs are not continued with conformance of above, they shall be removed in accordance with Subdivision 11 . Subd. 10 . Sign Permits and Fees. A. Sign Permits. No signs shall be erected or maintained anywhere in the City without first obtaining a sign permit. B. Application, Permit and Fees. A formal application together with accompanying documents prescribed by the City shall be submitted to the City Clerk-Treasurer to obtain a sign permit. Permit fees are as adopted by resolution of the Council and shall accompany the permit application. t4/:1"— C. Review of Applications. The Community Development Department shall review all sign permit applications except that applications for approval of permits for any sign requiring a variance shall be submitted to the Council for final approval. D. Return of the Fees. In the event an application for a variance shall be denied, the City Clerk-Treasurer sha~17' return ne applicant's permit fee, less administrative, cost ,porne by the City for notice, publication and review of the . japplication. Subd. 11. Removal . All signs which have not been removed within the designated time period may, upon giving notice to the applicant, be removed by the City, and any expense incurred by *the City may be charged to the sign owner or applicant and may assessed against the property on whic1 the sign is located. Ec.;:tion 2 . Eagan City Code Chapter 1 entitled "General Provisions and Definitions Applicable to the Entire City Code Including 'Penalty for Violation'" and Section 4 . 99 , entitled "Violation a Misdemeanor" are hereby adopted in their entirety by reference as though repeated verbatim. Section 3 . Effective Date. This ordinance shall take effect upon its adoption and publication according to law. ATTEST: CITY OF EAGAN City Council By: E. J. ;erbeke By: Thomas A. Egan Its : C Its: Mayor Date Ord_: .71ce Adopted: Date Ordinance Published in the Legal Newspaper: Agenda Information Memo May 7, 1991 City Council Meeting • ::NEW BUSINESS BUILDING PERMIT/CELLULpiR ONE A. Building Permit for Tower and Equipment Building, Cellular One at Deerwood Drive and I-35E--The City is in receipt of an application for a building permit for a permanent Cellular One tower facility located in the southwest quadrant of the intersection of Deerwood Drive and I-35E. The purpose of this facility would be to replace the temporary facility located in the northeast quadrant of the same intersection and approved by the City Council in November of last year. This item is being brought before the Council because the property in question is currently unplatted and such requests require Council approval. For additional information in this regard, please refer to the Community Develop ent Department staff report and associated attachments which are enclosed on pages IS Vfor your review. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the building permit for a tower and equipment building for Cellular One at Deerwood Drive and I-35E as presented. (t' MEMORANDUM TO: DALE C. RUNIKLE, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR FROM: JIM STURM, CITY PLANNER.r, DATE: APRIL 30, 1991 ii '� RE: CELLULAR ONE BUILDING PERMIT PARCEL 010-50, SW 1/4 OF SECTION 21 The City has received a request to allow a cellular phone tower with a maximum height of 100' and an associated building at the SW intersection of Deerwood Drive and I-35E. This Agricultural parcel consisting of approximately 4.9 acres was referenced as the permanent site for Cellular One when the City approved a Special Use Permit for a temporary site on the NE intersection of Deerwood Drive and I-35E. The Special Use Permit was approved on November 8, 1990 with the following conditions: 1. This Special Permit shall become void upon approval of the permanent cell site facility. 2. The tower shall not be in excess of 100' in height. City staff does not have the ability to issue a building permit on unpiatted property without Council approval. Public utility service facilities are a permitted use in Agricultural districts and the Council would have the ability to deem this cellular phone facility a similar use. The pole is at least 100' from the north and west property lines, thus meeting setback requirements. The Comprehensive Plan designates this parcel D-II (Mixed Residential, 0-6 units per acre). The City is currently processing a Waiver of Plat application for this site that will allow a split in the tax parcel that currently includes land on both sides of I-35E. This item will be scheduled for the May 28 APC meeting. This site would be considered a "second stage" facility. The applicant states that given the worst case scenario, other second stage sites could be located along Pilot Knob Road and I-35E and near I-35E and I-494 with a maximum pole height of 100' also. In the future, digital micro cells that could be attached to existing 40-50' tall buildings, light poles, and power poles, etc. are anticipated. Attached is the letter and exhibits submitted by Warren Dunlap of Cellular One and the November 8, 1990 City Council minutes. If approved, the building permit shall be subject to: 1. All building permit Code requirements. A landscape plan shall be submitted with the building permit application. 2. The building shall have a brick exterior. I 4LC.-- NE Nw T° ilt ZE ? / Nw• UNE Amu_-- ait-, 1541 !Al-1111 -41 .-. \-. liP' or Oft 1 RE deli :mit 4„, , ,... „ : i. ,_.,_ ,.: ri -..'"1 C let __ „,,,,, . .; ,,,,,.,;41.'11.,-.--,3,-..0.7 --tc.r:,: ,, Cl?W . ._ y1,MW Y F \ ) . �•IL ,„..,,.„, �`'Ittir 1 Y` t Lv� i}' ar - rptere7...Xc TER ...motet-ay 104 ortiati �^h� i �,DX I NE 1L_71E l _ r. J*Y....---(„1 .-fi Ags'- )...:: 0% ....."4...-.... 101.e c----,-t""-_....,.a-1-1,—.==-4ra------ii 0-----A Vt._ 401W . ' 1.111/1--.11.._ ____-__ _f_T„..___4417. _ • j--2_— ..u....i_ ,ell„wiii,„,„:0110 a a•cr, PI 2 - R - L y_t J � li I �!♦ -K.EtCo. - /ATM r:!1 E /. LN I — ia» €� C 1�j f L Q tir L �9 M[IK R + �d !'�� v f� DIr7l[t *MD MIT. .a T. 1 I viof ___ ` , 'ypyF ;7 114.1. c 2 1 E , c.C• r Nw & c 1) NE - T - F �S - L 6 C � M.,ik —• - �1--� ? , �� ig 4r- L . , z • a ..a: • ii; ° a .. i - • 1 f ,- :,•: :. i' i I I" ; 11.: i •.• ,: I 0 w .. i • _ - g • 0 ■•• ;i .. . )...CC M 1 • ; ::. =-...■44. )1)• I - lil"4 I : . *:; >C..I Z CI'''2 4 r. • •• g D J o i , PI: 1 ?: ; ; :: • 1 t) C7 . .. ! ` 1% ' I \ \ ii:i il ; il l'• r- -•.. .. si•• \ ::• .• :I r \ ...at .. . . ..:- \ li: . n ii \ \ \ 3 \ \ \ / \ / , \ , \ / / 1 / \ , / \ 0 \ ? ' --------,- \ \ - \ • , ,;;',/' , r/( xi ' X‘.' s% \ . t / '`-o!'": /' /,/ ■,..\ .. I.. ... ..... . .... \ N N r i I. . / ' ' ,t . r.1\ \1 .\•:\ I \\* I r, F [1 •-■: \\N I '. rff 1 ( L"-"..........,""'W • I • \ ' \ , T g 401 iil ' ,___----\s_____--%■ -----7L.3 . 4.-;r., \ 1 . ,4■.....c3,, ,..____________---,..•;:t i . 1 I i r' , : 0 \\ 'N. \,.• \'-, , :, \•-•IN. ,' .1' ■■."1", \ t--4.,--- i) s ` ' \ *,'N.' / ,/' /7j: 's N ' ,,_, , ■ „ \ ,,, \s„, , , /4 ...._....00,,, -............ ......010w"-41111111180 ..... irlifiiff AerASNIONIIM■' a 4:C:41./....,0•44- V. ',A...A•i: I I ...,!\ ; I II .- i 1 0.:pita -,--7.4.— 1.2.• !-, 4; .4:,_ t V i. • i t i , aF . 111 , •,,—,ii.7.,;, = '2 2 - 1 I:1•'i ' -. itir:vi:VPic,, --: —Al:i 0 ° : : : '-,- • ;_5-, ,.-,.,s,i■ ; g ; - ....0t.• 1 .s,•!q-Kiti •e .2 gi ,,, : a •• - ''— --1.1 r I U;:. I; .- •• •I .1:i \L .\ SPECIAL USE PERMIT/TEMPORARY CELLULAR TELEPHONE ANTENNA WARREN DUNLAP/CELLULAR ONE MOBILE TELEPHONE COMPANY After introduction by Mayor Egan, the City Administrator said that this application did not require action by the Advisory Planning Commission, and had come directly to the City Council. Director of Community Development Runkle said that the application before the Council was for a special use permit. He said that Cellular One was trying to get service in Eagan and had considered various alternatives but could not get a lease in place. Mr. Runkle said that Cellular One had identified a location for a permanent cell site at Parcel *10-02100-010-50; however, that property owner was not interested in a temporary arrangement. Mr. Runkle said that Cellular One was looking for approval of a temporary site at Parcel #10-02100-011-07 on the east side of 1-35E. He said that the temporary site would allow the applicant to provide better service immediately for their Cellular One customers and give them the opportunity to negotiate a more permanent site. Mr.Peter Beck,representing Cellular One Mobile Telephone Company,said that he had been working with Warren Dunlap in locating these facilities around the metro area. He said a temporary site had been found on the Tedd Aran property and they were discussing a more permanent site on the Francis Franz property. Mr. Be d said that Cellular One had experienced service problems in the Eagan area and that it would be at least six lotths before a permanent site would be in service. Mr.Beck said that a temporary site would have a 100 ftlbt antenna but when a permanent site is located, it would involve more antennas at lower heights. Mr.Warren Dunlap,also representing Cellular One Mobile Telephone Company,distributed a handout showing the temporary and permanent site locations. Mr.Dunlap said that Cellular One has thirty cell sites and anticipates six more by the end of the year including this one. He said they anticipate ten to twelve more in 1991. Mr. Dunlap said they have no site presently in Eagan and it is needed because all cells must be strategically placed to cover certain areas. After briefly explaining cellular technology,Mr.Dunlap said that they are currettily experiencing over 200 complaints a month and that the Eagan area gives them the most problems with carnage. He said they are working toward a more permanent site,however,a temporary location is needed to met demands. He said they have a one year lease at the temporary location and hope to have a more permanent site within four to five months, depending upon the weather. Councilmember Wachter asked Mr.Dunlap if it wouldn't be more advantageous for them to work on a permatent rather than a temporary site. Mr. Dunlap said they need to have the temporary site working immediately which would enable them to work on a more permanent site during that time. City Administrator Hedges said as a matter of public policy, a question had arisen whether antennas should be concentrated on public buildings or allowed to be constructed elsewhere throughout the City. Mr. Hedges said the City Council would probably wish to develop a public policy regarding antennas in the City. Mayor Egan asked the applicant if there was any reason they could not attach an antenna to one of the water towers within the City. Mr. Dunlap said they had tested the towers in the City and they do not provide the signal needed as does the temporary location. Mr. Beck then distributed pictures of what the permanent tower would look like. He also added that there are only two providers of cellular phones in the metropolitan area and they are U.S.West and Cellular One. He said this would be Cellular One's first tower in Eagan. Mr. Beck said that the next generation of towers would be lower and spread out more. At that time, they could possibly be placed on buildings. Councilmember Pawlenty said that rather than discussing a permanent site,the issue should 1*refocused on a temporary use. The Councilmember said he did not object to the temporary antenna as long as the time frame was defined. He agreed that public policy would have to be addressed regarding antennas throughout the City. Councilmember Gustafson said be was prepared to act on this application and was more inclined to approve a one year temporary antenna to encourage Cellular One to think beyond 100 foot towers. He said because of new technology, towers of that height may not be needed in the future. He said that the year time frame for the temporary antenna would give staff and the City Council the opportunity to determine a policy regarding antennas in the future. 4-(g tiustalson moved, McCrea seconded a motion to approve the request by Warren Dunlap of Cellular Mobile Telephone Company for a temporary antenna at the northeast corner of the overpass of I-35E by Deerwood Drive for a period not to exceed one year, subject to the following conditions: 1. This Special Permit shall become void upon approval of the permanent cell site facility. 2. The tower shall not be in excess if 100' in height. Mr.John Klein said that Mr. Francis Franz had asked him to speak on his behalf. He said Mr. Franz was willing to negotiate a permanent site with Cellular One; however, be said Cellular One was using this as a vehicle to get a permanent antenna on a temporary site. Mr. Klein said that before the City Council approved a temporary site, they should look at a more permanent site for the antennas. He said that attention should be given to the permanent site and if Cellular One did not negotiate in good faith, then a temporary site could be addressed. Coundlmember McCrea said that the application before the Council was for a temporary site. She said she would not be in favor of approving an extension of an additional year at the expiration of the year approved wltb this special use permit. Mr.Klein said that if the intent is to eventually approve a permanent site, he asked wiry they would not apply for the permanent site at this time instead of asking for a temporary location. He said that the City Council should not approve the temporary antenna predicated on getting a permanent site. Coandlmember Pawlenty said be did not agree that his vote would be predicated on a permanent site. He said his vote was for the temporary antenna only and when a permanent antenna was applied for,he would deal with it then. He said be was taking the application at face value. Coandlmember Gustafson said allowing the temporary location for a period of one year would give the City an opportunity to make policy decisions on free-standing towers. He also added that by the time a permanent location is necessary, the antenna may be affixed to a public building site. Mayor Egan added that the one year time frame would provide an opportunity to see state-of-the-art alternatives. Aye: S Nay: 0 • • C\ • • • : Cellular . •s•111! ■ . ■ s...■ ■ Ones ■s..i ■ • ■.s.e■■ The Mobile Telephone Company 2515 24th Avenue,Minneapolis, MN 55406(612)721-1660 March 8, 1991 City of Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, Minnesota 55121 Attn: Mr. Dale Runkle Re: Future cellular design for Eagan • Dear Dale: As per the city's request Cellular One has assembled two maps which show prospective cell sites for the city of Eagan. Map one shows the location of the second stage development cells. As you can see, the Deerwood location is designed to maximize the coverage for Eagan, while allowing Cellular One to remain at this location for an extended time period. However, given the worse case scenario, a second site may be located near Pilot Knob Road and I-494. The height of any additional site would not exceed 100 feet. If possible we would prefer to locate a cell on an existing building. Our current three year engineering plan does not foresee the need for any second cell site in the City of Eagan. As the system and technology developes we move into digital and micro cells for coverage. Map two shows possible locations for these micro cells. Primarily, micro cells would be located at major intersections or topographic lows within a city to provide coverage. These poles would range in height from 40 to 50 feet, with very small antennas and cabinets for the housing of radio equipment. Or they may also be located on existing buildings or structures (storm sirens) . As a system matures, the site locations become more critical. Using todays techonolgy and current information available to us, the total number of micro cells and second stage cells estimated to provide the necessary coverage for the Eagan area would be five. Please distribute this letter along with the enclosed outline sheet and maps to the mayor and council members. The enclosed outline would be used to give a brief presentation (15 minutes or less) to the city counci'. on March 19, 1991. However, Cellular One would be more than happy to meet with members of the staff or council prior to the March 19th meeting if additional explanation is required. We appreciate this opportunity to present this material to the mayor and council members so they have a better understanding of the future of cellular as it pertains to the City of Eagan. Very truly, Cellular One Warren Dunlap ■, IN ,, f^ r r•• MP ONE r4-.:' f'Ai 'i� ii �tOfii . Alis -74,v,.",!. e site • • MINI r // ¶INTN V • • ♦• I1; Oki .../ ITAIN ''YANK EE 1 P/ I 1141 LE'RD •-• .- ' kt....•" ,' 4 A T t' '''''' ii ' 13 AIM*, .. ■ l� _1 EI 35E .,ilaw-4-3 t -'' ' .... ..-:. ITI Est. i:.. r�V�I �� ���� t� _ FPILOT KN i : RD A,kla lrin , Perm. ..g statre _ tle&, c mile il■ .1 , NAPA I r. -- x V/ IF We-9:9;41 A alLirlim. I.Fmn troduruo ---41 / lw.1,itlifif' 1. ..W 120TH ST 1 C 4.11 -;-a M.V l,miniolle a r i l I gr/„r .- Li . ter . ,7.= . .e site ,.:. * . , . :, A . possible micro cett locations / „Ai • =. 1 If F INGi N Y ..• ./ AV: .• / &An ., 0 . ''. OF WV' tYAlt EE ! RD 1Bri . =�fSTHiiY f3 ■r l 1,• F135 -� la ma Apf�� ��e -Wallak �-PI 'T KNOB' ' , . r,i�?1 Perrn.,t at stare . e 1IIILTf _ .-- 44,‘14-M4in 1 Zig • . , 11111 :A A a��'/ FCEDAR AVE iY '��', tE',FF RD w..:G. WO ib 0 -Esollser,, te -r j 4 `� �..�_ . •i a AI NI W 120TH ST,' \ S.-VI, .CC t t Cr) i 1 I t 0 ro CO • .c W CO 0 O N d � c CD • t0 c > •� � Q 4- r •... >+ O if. 3 z 41 w CI r • ••••• _ c 'Tr 0 .— - o � o M C.) o CD a Y V♦ ) ♦ •_. °' o d N 0 � U = r 0 1 L c •- v QS o � N d r 0 O O O O 0 0 0 O O r G G) CO N r C 3 Agenda Information Memo May 7, 1991 City Council Meeting TRUNK HIGHWAY 149 CORRIDOR STUDY B. Resolution Acknowledging Highway 149 Corridor Study--The City is in receipt of a draft copy of the Trunk Highway 149 corridor study covering the area of that roadway from Trunk Highway 55 to Trunk Highway 3. This study was initiated by the City, Dakota County and MNDot to identify a long range concept for this section of roadway, particularly in light of the expansion of West Publishing Company. Implementation of the recommendations of the study are the responsibility of MNDot. As such, the City Council should consider acknowledgement of the study and its findings. For additional information in this regard, please refer to the Commu Development Department memorandum which is enclosed on pages IS(o through f 5 including the referenced resolution. Also enclosed without page number are copies of the draft study itself. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny a resolution acknowledging the Trunk Highway 149 corridor study. WHY DO WE NEED CELL SITES? * Coverage * Capacity WHY ARE WE IN EAGAN? * Coverage WHY AT THIS PARTICULAR SITE? *Low Impact * Zoning Allows *Provide Max Coverage To Eagan * Central Location To Traffic and City * Maintain Grid For Proper Operations 1985 * Cover large area 1st Stage * Few sells *Limited capacity now causes interference * Need to split into smaller cells 1989 - 2nd Stage * 150' below, moving from towers to poles *Above tree tops 1993 - DIGITAL *Provide 3 times capacity MICRO CELLS * Telephone pole heights 40'-50'can be below trees *Parking/mall light poles -located at intersections * Tied to "controller sites" on shelters (cabinets) * Reason To Locate A Micro Cell: 1996 - - Busy traffic area -Low Topography -Tunnels -Malls 2'' 2000 -/ Wrap-Up 1) Unknown growth of city also unknown growth of cellular customers. 2) Also, mention subs/channels. 3) No cell pole will exceed 100'. 4) Locate on existing buildings where and when possible. 5 Li MEMORANDUM TO: Tom Hedges, City Administrator FROM: Dale Runkle, Community Development Director DATE: April 30, 1991 SUBJECT: May 7, 1991 City Council Agenda Item - Highway 149 Corridor Study The City has received a copy of the draft "T.H. 149 Corridor Study From T.H. 55 .to T.H. 3". This study was initiated in the Fall of 1990 by the City, Dakota County and the Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnDOT) in order to establish a long-range concept design for the T.H. 149 corridor. In addition, the need for immediate interim improvements along T.H. 149 were considered in response to overall area traffic growth and specific growth anticipated by the expansion of West Publishing Company. The scope of this study was limited to that part of T.H. 149 between T.H. 55 on the north and T.H. 3 on the south. The Corridor Study identifies alternative design sections (considering rural versus urban designs and protected left turn lanes versus a continuous turn lane) and key access locations. The Corridor Study also identifies the implementation process, with recommendations of actions requested of each of the three primary review agencies. As such, the City Council is requested to adopt the attached resolution acknowledging the draft "T.H. 194 Corridor Study From T.H. 55 to T.H. 3" and supporting the study results. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please advise. Commune Development Director DCR/kcm { Y 1 RESOLUTION ACKNOWLEDGING THE TRUNK HIGHWAY 149 CORRIDOR STUDY FROM TRUNK HIGHWAY 55 TO TRUNK HIGHWAY 3 WHEREAS, the City of Eagan ("City") , Dakota County ("County") and the Minnesota Department of Transpertation ("MnDOT") initiated the Trunk Highway 149 Corridor Study ("Study") in the Fall of 1990 in an effort to establish a long range concept design for the Trunk Highway 149 Corridor; and WHEREAS, the Study also considered the need for immediate interim improvements along the corridor in response to overall area traffic growth and specific growth anticipated by the expansion of West Publishing Company; and WHEREAS, the scope of the Study was limited to the segment of Trunk Highway 149 between Trunk Highway 55 on the north and Trunk Highway 3 on the south; and WHEREAS, the Study identified alternative design sections, key access locations, and a process by which to implement the Study. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the City of Eagan acknowledges the Trunk Highway 149 Corridor Study and will support the results of the Study through the following: 1. Verifying that future development plats adhere to the desired access orientations on Trunk Highway 149 as identified in the Study and that additional access is orientated towards local streets rather than Trunk Highway 149. 2 . Informing existing, potential and future local property owners in the corridor of the future ultimate design of Trunk Highway 149 and the identified access locations. 3 . Encouraging redevelopment configurations at the northern corridor limits which emphasize the desired frontage road alignments. S '1 THIS RESOLUTION passed this day of , 1991. CITY OF EAGAN By: Thomas A. Egan, Mayor Its: Mayor ATTEST: By: E.J. VanOverbeke Its: Clerk s8 Agenda Information Memo May 7, 1991 City Council Meeting VARIANCE/RETAIL USE/CRATE PROSPECTS LIMITED. C. Variance, Crate Prospects, Ltd., to Exceed the Maximum of 5% Retail for an Allowed Use in a Limited Industrial Zoning District, Located in the Bell Lexington Addition in the SW 1/4 of the SW 1/4 of Section 2--An application has been received of Crate Prospects, Ltd., at the above referenced location for a variance to exceed the 5% maximum retail use in a limited industrial zoning district. For additional information in this regard, please refer to the Commynity Development Department staff report which is enclosed on pages / () through I (./ f for your review. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny a variance for Crate Prospects Ltd., to exceed the maximum of 5% retail for an allowed use in a limited industrial zoning district as presented. • 1 S� SUBJECT: VARIANCE APPLICANT: CRATE PROSPECTS LOCATION: BELL LEXINGTON ADDITION • SW 1/4 OF SECTION 2 EXISTING ZONING: LI (LIGHT INDUSTRIAL) DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: MAY 7, 1991 DATE OF REPORT: APRIL 30, 1991 COMPILED BY: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT APPLICATION SUMMARY: An application has been submitted requesting a Variance to the allowed retail sales in a Light Industrial zoning district. BACKGROUND: Crate Prospects is a family-owned and operated furniture manufacturing business that began in 1976. The company currently has one store located at 7622 Lyndale Avenue South. All of the company's manufacturing takes place in Eagan. The manufacturing facility was moved to Lexington Avenue and Lone Oak Road early in 1987. The company began strictly designing, manufacturing, and selling furniture. As the company grew, it started meeting customer demands for incidental items. The company now provides a full array of home furnishings with the majority manufactured by the applicant. EXISTING CONDITIONS: The Crate Prospects operation is housed in the old Bell Telephone building. North of the site is the post office, east is vacant Industrial land, south is a Montessori School, and west is Agricultural land. Directly across the street on the southwest corner of the intersection is vacant property zoned for General Business use. COMMENTS: Crate Prospects would like to make the Eagan location the company's corporate headquarters, while still maintaining the site as its only manufacturing location. This Variance request is to allow Crate Prospects to increase its gross retail sales in Eagan to approximately 25%. The City's policy has been to limit these sales to 5%. All products manufactured by the applicant are sold at wholesale. The applicant is proposing a 10,000 sq. ft. expansion to the current 14,000 sq. ft. facility to provide more showroom area, as well as creating office space and an increase in the manufacturing area. Due to the size of the company, the proposed expansion will be done in two phases. The timing of Phase II is directly related to the cost and timing of Phase I. (QO If approved, this Variance shall be subject to the following conditions: 1. No other Variances shall be granted. 2. All rooftop mechanical equipment shall be screened. 3. All trash and recycling containers shall be stored indoors. 4. All other applicable Ordinances are adhered to. 1. " � � ^ � / ,` -~__. -- ._._____=_..3 .... -—-—---- \ 1 I I IkAl ;,.,,__.._....1_........_.___.3 t.' ____I 0 0 va,7_,_ - / ' c!,, 4'A- -`'..... ) f A \\\(' .04 COL;\NlifiriME ■'As 'I S T. , \ Iii sw E A • ,..... YS '' i N _, sw P.IRK ..1.,. [BAbl'' ' 'I 02'f ' ' '''- H . ...„(,_. ., , i., 51,7?ye k r rid P'f-, _\IFE 1.6 rif Ali . _ ,c0 . . „,-1._ , , 3. Irrii .........„ ii4 _ '-,4 c' , i..;\ ‘ ,...___4 - -,-„„ _______„.• , 3„, - R. ji, m•. , E PAAR 0 ■ o Oil /- - 7- 551 21 ,,.1")RIN flP .6.•-•.., j 4-PORIEST R I DOE 1,, . , q ; 1: . TY `'- /a■--) 5- IROMPOOD IN 1 0 6 41°.r / C t ^/ ( (s e I I 1:: "...' •`ew/144Toh1 AvC • 1 D, <3 (—•• ••7 L..,____/ ....._,.., 1 A 0 i T— - I 3 •k '.- I• • 0 z � ) ;o� , 0 (N 11 � e.. i aL .W�ro O o.. J i i i 1 , ( -T \\ I I I I it—RN!.,i (_-_-. 1 J_L J_.1 TTL V..4 ...IR).-tee d 1�-l��l •o■r.. Neu ". a - 1 r �t - t.w,.r TV TA,. - .4'c S tafl,L. - ie.bt',r. Le 5 SITE PLAN I 1111i5-6-42.L—tE?-441 NNE b- 1 !! toate - i- - -Mle i ' f °ii�i y 1� �_ ���I i<� _�,!!Mil 1 cif i SOUTH ELEVATION r - 112 - —--•—— :"1 Alommemc••• S ttit•t!Etlt t1i� liti,li!l��::1=[i::l EAST ELEVATION • (0(4 Agenda Information Memo May 7, 1991 City Council Meeting SIDE YARD SETBACK VARIANCE/FAIRWAY HILLS ADDITION D. Variance, Barbara Robinson,of Approximately 4' to the 10' Side Yard Setback, Located on Lot 4, Block 2, Fairway Hills Addition--The City is in receipt of an application from Barbara Robinson for a variance of 4' to the required 10' side yard setback for property located at 1307 St. Andrew Boulevard in the Fairway Hills Addition. For additional information in this regard, please r fer to the Community Development Department staff report which is enclosed on pages (Co(r through gal for your review. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny a variance for Barbara Robinson of approximately 4' to the 10' side yard setback on Lot 4, Block 2 of Fairway Hills Addition as presented. SUBJECT: VARIANCE APPLICANT: BARBARA J ROBINSON LOCATION: 1307 ST ANDREW BLVD P.I.D. #10-25600-040-02 EXISTING ZONING: R-1 (SINGLE FAMILY) DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: MAY 7, 1991 DATE OF REPORT: APRIL 30, 1991 COMPILED BY: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT APPLICATION SUMMARY: An application has been submitted by Barbara Robinson requesting a Variance of 4' to the required 10' minimum building setback. COMMENTS: Ms. Robinson has requested a Variance to facilitate building a three-season porch on the northeast corner of the house. When her house was designed originally, it was designed with a door and an electrical outlet to accommodate the porch. The lot is narrow and the house was placed incorrectly on the lot when built. It was to be placed at a minimum setback of 10' on the west side, but instead was placed at 14.88'. If this placement would have been done correctly, a Variance would not be required. Only a small portion of the northeast corner of the porch will encroach into the setback area, being approximately 6.78' from the property line. The proposed porch does not encroach into the drainage and utility easement along the side property line. All other building setbacks meet City Code requirements. If approved, this Variance shall be subject to the following conditions: 1. A building permit shall be required. 2. All other Code requirements shall be met. (C) Barbara J. Robinson Variance la ".., • a: S �c r ■ I ,.. �� �/ �., ^s Stre et Map � R4 /ao u, I S ! t/I.• s rI WALDEN i PARK NE C{�J cot£ .�A y fry GaLsE 3 II\ EORGE ' .a .tON , 4 -- I•_wAv I IR. 1lra • M, 9,.m ;l J.6 1 d Li f tiri 1 i Pk t ,1 isj� ; _ Zoning Map A }t.. I-�.. � 4I� , � . . Y - . i = ;, .'J\ I j a AtJ6 .,, 1 - N.. t %,7,J,,i , , . , ( 7 I - D-I - r 1 7PF PF I 7- , ,....IL jc---- ,..1 0 PF ` 1 Comp Guide Plan Map . ,1-)k D-I ri 1.-- PF N. t -_---' V-0-1,. w46tiE� yo.4Es f)fi O!3 E #2ss0,o/ ENGINEERING COIISULT1110 and LAND s PLAIIfiEAS and tAHA iURVEYOf1S COMPANY, INC. ,1000 EAST 146111 STREET, BUAHSVILLE, ULUHESOTA 5_237 P11 4'2-3000 Cr-z`zJz cczZe of tgz“3---v e (J s 48• o7•'E 1/ooz,'; 90,00 3,ra�Ca7 -OJOI r o2icn: LOT4, B'_O 2, FAIRWAY H/LLS,/`+�s7. o Cio,v I MKOTA COUN7Y, MINNESOTA /———1 eoio,o) r ��,� 5/ �5, �, • _°� DENOTES EXISTING ELEVATION / I / / 1 v �•(/03/.0 'DENOTES PROPOSED ELEVATION '\ �— INDICATES DIRECTION OF SURFACE DRAINAGE I i �v ‘-' /031,33 =FINISHED GARAGE FLOOR ELEVATION // / / /1)33.62- `_ =BASEMENT FLOOR ELEVATION / C F-` ' /6"54 66 =TOP OF BLOCK ELEVATION / O / / . 4f) (4/ / ) ' titi / / / / ttti (\ J I o ,i' v / I . 0 1_ SC41.6 . /" = 30' / ..JI / • 30' FRONT BUILD/N6 �.3s; I 5ET/3ACK L/NE // 4.'"411:,�oZ3 J /, '" I,\ // `(°23. ( )/ - 0 6°Z3 S ti� ors asc s; ' 1, /°, / a° <4.\ 6 5 z°3`D s:,„ /6 '°.F. 00 \ /`y Qo/03 3 - ,O SS S. `-5/ 3 G9s / \ \ - --)az Q'" O Q. . /\` '8/ oRA/Ng6E ANC) _ `s'> / 26. Rr ° UT/Ll7Y EASENIEA/ S \,2>, ' 8/ I J r ( �.R G-",e cs L i'U C -9N,n�� 3.3" > .7°29,6, � 8p U C�'ei VXiRv °Z9 081 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct representation of a tract of land as shown' and described hereon.. As prepared by me on this Z77" day of A/I4gcH , l9_. 1 c.,U 4'17'7:dg-4--1 Hinn. /tea. No.1608 30,0o j t 1 , l \ // I / ,/ l /1/ 1 i, �I/ / / i / 1wse ! I I I 1 / -_ only? u0» y I 1 I ! / 1 Ii lU5 I I it f ' • I G-,r/3 la,s. al'--or act, i l.,/ / i GRrAGP I t I i ,1 ' I '`\ Lof Cave I It ' 1 uf� /� �rg4AG,. PASFM,y� / \.._ ,,,,,,__1..):,arPcaJ Li v<I - N . (.:pc::\ • Agenda Information Memo May 7, 1991 City Council Meeting SPECIAL USE PERMIT/DAKOTA ELECTRIC ASSOCIATION SUBSTATION AND TRANSMISSION LINE E. Special Use Permit, Dakota Electric Association, to Allow the Construction of an Electric Substation and the Accompanying Transmission Line on Part of Lot 1, Block 1, West Publishing 1st Addition--The City is in receipt of a special permit application from Dakota Electric to permit construction of an electric substation and its transmission line on the above referenced property. This substation is necessary to provide for the electrical needs of the expanded West Publishing facility. The substation will be connected to the existing Dakota Electric Facilities by transmission line along the north side of Wescott Road from Deerwood School to the proposed location. For additional information in this regard, please refer to the Community Development Department staff report which is enclosed on pages 1( through 03 for your review. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny a special use permit for Dakota Electric Association for the construction of an electric substation and the accompanying transmission line on part of Lot 1, Block 1, West Publishing 1st Addition as presented. no SUBJECT: SPECIAL PERMIT APPLICANT: DAKOTA ELECTRIC & COOPERATIVE POWER LOCATION: LOT 1, BLOCK 1, WEST PUBLISHING 1ST ADDITION SE 1/4 OF SECTION 13 EXISTING ZONING: LI (LIGHT INDUSTRIAL) DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: MAY 7, 1991 DATE OF REPORT: APRIL 30, 1991 COMPILED BY: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT APPLICATION SUMMARY: An application has been submitted requesting a Special Permit to allow the construction of an electric substation and accompanying transmission line. COMMENTS: Operation of West Publishing computers requires additional power to the site currently not available. The substation is a joint venture between Dakota Electric and Cooperative Power to ensure continuous amounts of required power. Transmission lines will run along the north side of Wescott Road from Deerwood School. These lines will be attached to new power poles placed in existing easements. Also, the substation will be located entirely on West Publishing property and will be screened on all sides. If approved, this Special Permit will be subject to the following conditions: 1. Substation will be fully screened on all sides. 2. All other applicable ordinances are adhered to. fEDeR STPEF* 1 \ \ _. BECKER RO a rr 1:3 gyp ADO • \ ' CT • 941• R n rr�yr� `, ;.i'J .I•V_�'L • 4 O - aisr I SE • as G `, � rerN - .• ANDERING MAL F _Ct44 1 sC :ll cT I ° WESCOTT .y= •• !�, LTTT f+t ,t- �b' ratt77,p t riPrir l� V' =J N[Yl 7t.' �� � .�__ . iRIIN:F �. [ •..r.. 1 r a 'matt 0000U NOW L1LM H L.............„...... 1 �6 Vide•••••• 4M AIM U71Zff1AC. • _ `\ wn• w tom. �1 \ \ f��• y • j a : f 1 ....r _ 11D•S1T•1 ‘• II. ,...49.. ,, 1 • Nournot w+r�.� t'• �4:•ApG t� ..1114 w: �• i1M, rfi7i L07 It '' 40�AC. . • trtrtol� �. ► • rtre 1 E ` t. 1111.1111119•110 I ` •1 .6- r \ 7,.. . •`% 1111:111•iJ F•---HiL! •` .. 1111:111•�do w n do vow _ .\ .L' ^ n •• I'... \ • . I D ,�t il 4` • cif O • wain _T ..-MIS:Q�AC1 .� III /6...• \ trarnibl E E J.___.�_� \ 11:3.15711K \ , , -"N (-- --\\ 1 v . , , , f 77 I\ - !Ille: ..----4*---• . ' t'-0... l ' Al _..:-.1*-----' . III III ii; q; t ' i 1. i II, lE • II� I l i '�`�I I � 1 ,i ! 1 I� i ; !111!l I1I II Ill I 111111'I it ` 11ilg11111/i,111ILINI III. I11 i,., l 1 • i tiii r,lil ., ; 11 � _ . 1 i i II II I 1 II I'' I, II 1 1 1- - I ■• I i 1 111111,�1,11iI I'WEST .o • i • 1• t• I ,� I nt.pp.G rtEM0 P°6Se: CArrt o N 7 7---- , 1 i , , "/ . .: \ \ \ ' 1 1.'�-1 --/-\\ % -'x„ 90:' .\ N� \ `\ 1 , t. �' ( ' 1 . C ..,,.,„ ———1 I 1 ik/ / I hir v ‘ / OW\'1 ,, \ \ / / wt�,; �1 1 V ` , 9J. 1L!` I. y 1 / / .... �' / \ / / \ / �,� u 7 5\ 5 ,.' t ,1 I i 1 .., • �` Y �\ x,11+ el/ /'. . , ,,,\ ,:, ./ 1 1 \ ; t/( / . .. i1 I I 1 , , ,,, �I 1111 I�'111� 911,D / �q / ` .' ��I ' I I•. ///�• I'f�I��i 11,I \ / 1 '� / l I E 7 1„; 1 v I , I \ i 1 JI /i/.4---^ /� _e'�_ '� —j ` — `'0 J /I I ;�1./ { i I I / i — _7-- / /i _st . 1 N S ,1 \' 1'11,i � \ /•1,' � /,�,/ %� ° , -�, �� _ , / - e—..,„„ .,, � � / 111 i � -� .4, s, p • ..,4_._____• , \' 1',, i 1 1 , \ i, , 9 tz,f figigr,41.....■.i7sf. ' Ili 1 1, \\,.„ --._../ . �, �� ,III 11 --_=-�-_-. /..-------.. 114\ 0, 1\, `�1 ,o\\\\\ _/, \ 1 ` Q.= °'�' _ _---- _-J _) l /1 Web5C' Orr 1°1°644 b k. 13 1- Agenda Information Memo May 7, 1991 City Council Meeting • COMPREHENSIVE GUIDE PLAN AMENDMENT/PUBLIC UTILITIES ELEMENT F. Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment to the Public Utilities Element Which Updates the Public Utilities Element to 1990/1991 and Revises the Public Utilities Element for Conformance with Metropolitan System Plans--At its meeting of April 23, the Advisory Planning Commission considered a Comprehensive Guide Plan amendment revising the public utilities element of the City's Comprehensive Guide Plan. For additional information in this regard, please refeto the Co; ?unity Development Department staff report which is enclosed on pages/ 7.1 through/ , . including a copy of the public utilities plan element. As is noted in Senior Planner Marnin's memo enclosed on page / upon City Council approval, the amendment will be forwarded to the Metropolitan Coufcil and the sanitary sewer section of the element will be reviewed by the MWCC. These reviews should be completed by late summer or early fall at which time the amendment will be returned to the Council for final adoption. Also enclosed on pages N through for your review is a copy of the Advisory Planning Commission minutes in this regard. The APC is recommending approval of this item. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny a Comprehensive Guide Plan amendment revising the public utilities element of the City's Comprehensive Guide Plan. t L'( SUBJECT: AMENDMENT TO THE EAGAN COMPREHENSIVE GUIDE PLAN AMENDING THE PUBLIC UTILITIES PLAN ELEMENT APPLICANT: CITY OF EAGAN LOCATION: CITYWIDE • DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: APRIL 23, 1991 DATE OF REPORT: APRIL 17, 1991 COMPILED BY: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BACKGROUND: The Metropolitan Council revised (amended) its Wastewater Treatment and Handling Policy Plan in 1988. The 1976 Metropolitan Land Planning Act requires local governments, after receiving an amendment to a metropolitan system plan, to review its comprehensive plan to determine if an amendment is necessary to ensure continued conformity with metropolitan system plans. The City of Eagan received the revised Wastewater Treatment and Handling Policy PIan in April 1989. In reviewing this revised metropolitan system plan, City staff determined that an amendment to the Public Utilities Plan Element of the Eagan Comprehensive Guide Plan would be necessary in order for the City's utilities plan to be in conformance with this revised metropolitan system plan. The City informed the Metropolitan Council in December 1989 of its intent to prepare an amendment. This amendment of the Public Utilities Plan Element updates the existing' Element to 1990'1991 and revises the Element for conformance with the revised metropolitan Wastewater Treatment and Handling Policy Plan. The amended Element will replace the existing Public Utilities Plan Element in its entirety. PUBLIC UTILITIES PLAN ELEMENT UPDATE: The Public Utilities Plan Element of the Eagan Comprehensive Guide Plan establishes the goals and policies for guiding and reviewing the public utility systems in the City. These public utility systems include water distribution and supply, sanitary sewers, water quality, and stormwater management. The Public Utilities Plan Element consists of the Element chapter (i.e., the amended Element document) contained within the Comprehensive Guide Plan and four reference reports. ' The "existing" Public Utilities Plan Element was developed c. 1979-80 for inclusion in the 19Sn Eagan Comprehensive Guide Plan, adopted in 1983. The 1988 Comprehensive Guide Plan Update did not revise this Public Utilities Plan Element. 1 The Plan Element is divided into four sections: A) Municipal Water Supply and Distribution, B) Wastewater Handling and Treatment, C) Water Quality Management, and D) Stormwater Management. A summary and background of each of the four detailed reports prepared for these respective public utility services is provided in the Plan Element. In addition, the Plan Element lists out the City's public utilities goals and policies. Basically, data as contained in the existing Element related to City water supply and distribution, sanitary sewers, and stormwater management was merely updated for this amendment to reflect the most recent engineering reports prepared for these services. These reports include the 1988 Water Supply and Distribution Plan, the 1991 Comprehensive Sewer Policy Plan and the 1990 Stormwater Management Plan, all prepared for the City by Bonestroo, Rosene, Anderlik, and Associates. Each of these plans have been approved by the City Council. The Water Quality Management section, however, is totally new as the City did not have a water quality management plan when the existing Element was prepared. The information contained in the water quality section of the amended Element reflects the information contained in the adopted 1990 Water Quality Management Plan, prepared by the Eagan Water Quality Task Force. The goals and policies contained in the Public Utilities Plan Element are the basis for utility planning and management in Eagan. The existing Element did not specifically list goals and policies for utility planning and management. However, the four reference reports, approved by the City Council, do contain such goals and policies. The amended Element sets forth these goals and policies as taken from the reference reports. As such, the goals and policies as now listed in the amended Element are not new per se. Rather, they reflect the direction of utility planning in Eagan as noted in the four reference reports and attempt to meet the requirement of conformance with metropolitan systems plans. A copy of the amended Public Utilities Plan Element is attached to this staff report. (The existing--to be replaced--Public Utilities Plan Element is located in Chapter V of the Eagan Comprehensive Guide Plan). ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: To recommend approval or denial of an amendment to the Eagan Comprehensive Guide Plan which amends the Public Utilities Plan Element as presented. 2 5/PUBLIC UTILITIES PLAN ELEMENT EAGAN COMPREHENSIVE GUIDE PLAN 1990/91 ADOPTED: 5/PUBLIC UTILITIES PLAN ELEMENT The provision of adequate public utility services is essential to maintain the health, welfare and safety of Eagan's A. WATER SUPPLY AND citizens, to promote orderly DISTRIBUTION development, and to protect environmental quality. The Public Utilities Plan of the Eagan The City of Eagan has provided Comprehensive Guide Plan is intended municipal water service to various areas to establish goals and policies for within its boundaries since 1961. Prior guiding and reviewing the public utility to that time, the Valley View Plateau and systems in the City. Cedar Grove Additions were served by private systems. Also, the Timberline The Public Utilities Plan consists of four and Kingswood Additions were served sections: A) Municipal Water Supply by private systems for a short period of and Distribution, B) Wastewater time. In 1965, the Water Supply and Handling and Treatment, C) Water Distribution Report for Eagan outlined a Quality Management, and D) Stormwater method of connecting the various Management. A summary and systems and forming a municipal water background of Eagan's plans for each system with a centralized source of of these public utility services, including supply. Each of the private water goals and policies, is contained in this systems was integrated into the Plan. Details, including maps, are municipal system. The Water Supply contained in each of the reports and Distribution Report has been re- referenced herein. evaluated and revised periodically since 1965 to reflect changes in land use GOAL: trends, most recently in 1988. The 1988 Water Supply and Distribution Plan, ■ To ensure the adequate and prepared by Bonestroo, Rosene, dependable provision of public Anderlik, and Associates, Inc., utilized utilities in an efficient, economical, the Eagan Comprehensive Land Use and environmentally sound manner. Guide Plan as the basis for the development of the water supply and distribution system. 1 5/PUBLIC UTILITIES PLAN ELEMENT GOAL: Roads, and the South Well Field located near the water treatment plant (to be • To develop and provide a water completed in 1991) at Cliff and Pilot system capable of supplying and Knob Roads. distributing potable water of high quality to all points of demand within 2. TREATMENT Eagan at acceptable residual pressures. Water quality is generally good. With the construction of a 12.0 MGD iron- POLICY: manganese removal treatment plant at the North Well Field site in 1984, and . Evaluate supply, storage and the completion of a 14.0 MGD iron- distribution system plans periodically manganese removal treatment plant at as changes in the Comprehensive the South Well Field site in 1991, Land Use Guide Plan and problems with excess iron and development occurs. manganese in the distribution system should be eliminated. After filtration of 1. SUPPLY iron and manganese, the water is ultimately fluoridated, chlorinated, and Water supply is currently provided by pumped into the distribution and 18 wells, with 16 wells pumping from the storage system. Jordan Aquifer and two wells from the Hinkley-Mt. Simon Aquifer. Total 3. STORAGE pumping capacity is approximately 20,800 gallons per minute (gpm), or Water storage is currently provided by a 29.95 million gallons per day (MGD). 0.6 million gallon (MG) treatment plant The 1988 Water Supply and Distribution clearwell, a 0.5 MG elevated tank, a 5.0 Plan sets forth a program of continued MG ground reservoir, two 4.0 MG expansion of the deep well system to ground reservoirs, and a 2.0 MG ground serve the ultimate growth needs of reservoir for a total of 16.1 MG of Eagan with approximately 36 wells for a storage. The 1988 Water Supply and total production capacity of 51 MGD Distribution Plan provides for the (35,400 gpm). These wells will be construction of additional storage divided between two major well fields— facilities with a total ultimate capacity of the North Well Field, located in the north 29.1 MG. end of Eagan near the water treatment plant on Coachman and Yankee Doodle 2 11c 5/PUBLIC UTILITIES PLAN ELEMENT 4. DISTRIBUTION The distribution system consists of lines B. WASTEWATER HANDLING that vary in size from 6 inches to 30 AND TREATMENT inches in diameter, and is designed to provide adequate water supply at proper pressures..for all portions of the The sanitary sewer system of Eagan City during periods of normal peak includes trunk and laterals, sanitary demands. Figure 8 of the 1988 Water sewer lines, lift stations and force mains, Supply and Distribution Plan illustrates house service lines and all other the City's water distribution system. correlated items associated with the collection and transportation of The topography of Eagan requires that wastewater from its point of generation the City be divided into three primary to the interceptor sanitary sewers of the pressure level zones separated by Metropolitan Waste Control Commission. pressure reducing valves and booster All of the sanitary sewer system of the stations. The Low Level Pressure Zone City drains toward the Seneca serves the area generally adjacent to Wastewater Treatment Plant, located T.M. 13 and is maintained at a high near the Minnesota River flood plain in water elevation of 950. The Intermediate western Eagan. Complete details of this Level Pressure Zone, serving the trunk sanitary sewer system are majority of the City, operates at a high contained in the 1991 Comprehensive water elevation of 1,059. The High Level Sewer Policy Plan of the City of Eagan, Pressure Zone operates at a high water prepared by Bonestroo, Rosene, elevation of 1,150 and serves the Anderlik, and Associates, Inc. southern part of the City. A very small fourth pressure zone exists in the Valley Municipal sanitary sewer service was View Plateau Addition which provides first provided within the City of Eagan in intermediate pressures between the 1966 through a network of trunk and Intermediate and Low Level Pressure lateral sewers in the northern and Zones. In each of the pressure zones, western portions of the City. The initial the static pressure in the water sanitary sewer system was installed in distribution system is generally accordance with the "Report on Sanitary maintained between 40 pounds per Sewerage Facilities for Eagan Township square inch (psi) and 85 psi. - 1965". This original report has been re-evaluated and revised periodically since 1965 to reflect changes in land 3 5/PUBLIC UTILITIES PLAN ELEMENT • use trends, most recently in 1991. Table 5.B.1.a shows the projected GOAL: number of households, sewered population, and employees to be served • To continue to provide adequate by the sanitary sewer system in the sanitary sewer capacity to meet the years 1990, 2000 and 2010. These needs and demands of existing and projections are based on the land use future uses in an efficient and and density information contained in the economical manner. Land Use Plan Element of the Eagan Comprehensive Land Use Guide Plan. 1. SYSTEM NEEDS AND DESIGN The total area served by Eagan's sanitary sewer system is approximately Planning for a wastewater treatment and 24,500 acres, and is not expected to handling system must begin with an change between now and the year understanding of the characteristics of 2010. the area to be served. Land uses, population, households and employment Table 5.B.1.b shows the projected serve to identify sewer system needs, average sewage flow for the sanitary and hence to aid in the system design. sewer system for the years 1990, 2000 Land use information as contained in and 2010. The Comprehensive Sewer the Land Use Plan Element of the Policy Plan provides information on the Eagan Comprehensive Guide Plan was methodology and assumptions used in used in the development of the 1991 calculating these flows. Comprehensive Sewer Policy Plan. In order to estimate the volume of POLICY: wastewater flow anticipated, unit rates of wastewater generation were assigned to • Design sewer trunk expansions in each land use category with resulting relation to the land use densities of flows for each sub-district presented in the Comprehensive Land Use Guide Appendix B of the Comprehensive Plan. Sewer Policy Plan. An additional issue related to system Appendix A of the Comprehensive needs and design is that of extraneous Sewer Policy Plan itemizes anticipated water entering the sanitary sewer system land use, including gross acreages and through infiltration and inflow (I/I). number of dwelling units for each major Infiltration is the contribution of flow that district and subdistrict. is primarily attributable to high 4 1 5/PUBLIC UTILITIES PLAN ELEMENT • TABLE 5.B.1.a: HOUSEHOLD, POPULATION AND EMPLOYMENT PROJECTIONS ESTIMATED SEWERED YEAR HOUSEHOLDS POPULATION EMPLOYEES 1990 17,410 46,389 29,480 2000 23,710 60,292 62,200 2010 30,010 73,674 71,800 TABLE 5.B.1.b: PROJECTED SEWAGE FLOW FOR SANITARY SEWER SYSTEM ESTIMATED AVERAGE YEAR SEWAGE FLOW (MGD) 1990 6.83 2000 9.85 2010 12.90 5 5/PUBLIC UTILITIES PLAN ELEMENT groundwater levels, and inflow is attributable to increased surface water • Forbid extraneous flows. amounts. • Systematically monitor, inspect, and Eagan's topography consists of well- televise sewer lines and make drained soils, and the majority of the necessary repairs. sanitary sewer in the City is above the water table. In addition, 90 percent of 2. SYSTEM DESCRIPTION Eagan's sewer system was installed in the last 25 years with design The trunk sanitary sewer system layout considerations and materials addressing for the City of Eagan is presented on the need to minimize I/I. Also, the City Figure 7 in the 1991 Comprehensive has an active continuous sewer Sewer Policy Plan. This map shows maintenance program where the entire major district and subdistrict boundaries, system is televised every 3 to 4 years to existing and proposed trunk sanitary identify existing and potential I/I sewers and lift stations and force mains. problems. For these reasons, I/1 is not In addition, sizes of all trunk sewers are as serious of a problem as it is in some shown with reference points along each other communities. pipe. Design flow data for each segment are presented in Appendix C The design flows used for development of the 1991 Comprehensive Sewer of the Comprehensive Sanitary Sewer Policy Plan. Policy Plan incorporate an allowance for an average of 15 gallons per capita per There are five major sanitary sewer day of I/I. Also, current design districts in the City: the Burnsville specifications limit infiltration to 100 Outlet, Cedar Grove, West, Central and gallons per day per inch of diameter per North Districts. Each district defines the mile of pipe. limits of service for a separate trunk system. These districts are further POLICIES: subdivided into smaller subdistricts that were used to develop design flows and To prevent and reduce infiltration and to determine cumulative design flow in inflow (Ill): the various sewer segments. • Continue to strictly monitor The Metropolitan wastewater construction of all new sanitary conveyance and treatment facilities that sewer. serve Eagan include: 6 ID 5/PUBLIC UTILITIES PLAN ELEMENT POLICIES: • Joint Interceptor, a 72-inch gravity sewer line conveying flows from the . Continue extension of the sanitary Cedar Grove and West Districts, sewer system in accordance with the Burnsville, Bloomington, and Savage. layout as contained in the 1991 This line has a capacity in excess of Comprehensive Sewer Policy Plan. 40 MGD. Prohibit the installation of private • Eagan Interceptor, a 42- to 54-inch sewer systems. line which conveys flow from the West and Central trunk lines of the Eagan system as well as the North 3. ON-SITE DISPOSAL SYSTEMS Interceptor. Presently, approximately 2.7 percent of • North Interceptor, a major trunk line Eagan's single-family residences, servicing the northern portion of dispersed throughout the City, utilize Eagan and a portion of Inver Grove individual on-site disposal systems. It is Heights. expected that the number of on-site systems in Eagan will be reduced as • Seneca Wastewater Treatment Plant, municipal sewer service is extended a 24 MGD treatment plant located in through the City; however, a few on-site the Cedar Industrial area of western disposal systems will likely remain even Eagan serving Eagan, Burnsville, after the year 2010. The City of Eagan Bloomington, and Savage. encourages connection to the municipal Expansion of this plant to a capacity sewer system, but allows on-site of 34 MGD is currently under systems provided that they are installed construction, with completion and maintained in accordance with City scheduled for 1993. regulations. There are no private sewer systems The 1991 Comprehensive Sewer Policy located within Eagan, nor does the City Plan defines a program for the permit the installation of private systems, regulation and management of on-site with the exception of on-site septic wastewater disposal systems. systems were municipal sewer is not available. POLICIES: • Regulate and manage on-site 7 / Fci 5/PUBUC UTIUTIES PLAN ELEMENT wastewater disposal systems in Quality Management Plan and accordance with the program Stormwater Management Plan in 1990, d e f i n e d in t h e 1 9 9 1 both with goals and policies directed Comprehensive Sewer Policy toward dealing with nonpoint source Plan. pollution and water quality issues. For details of the City's goals and policies • Encourage connection to the regarding water quality, refer to Parts metropolitan sanitary sewer system 5.0 and 5.D of this Plan Element. where such service is available. 4. NONPOINT SOURCE POLLUTION C. WATER ' QUALITY All of Eagan's sanitary sewer system MANAGEMENT drains to the Seneca Wastewater Treatment Plant in western Eagan. Treated wastewater is then discharged Eagan has over 350 water bodies within from the Seneca Plant into the nearby its corporate limits, ranging from large Minnesota River. Although lakes (Jensen Lake, 42.5 acres) to small improvements currently under heavily vegetated wetlands. The City's construction at the Seneca Plant are natural setting and proximity to designed to improve the quality of Minneapolis and St. Paul have made it treated wastewater discharged to the one of the fastest growing cities in the Minnesota River, nonpoint sources must state. As the population of Eagan has also be considered in any attempt to increased, the potential for the improve water quality. Point sources degradation of the ponds and lakes in (eg., wastewater treatment plants) with Eagan due to development impacts has identifiable points of entry into increased. waterbodies, and nonpoint sources (eg., urban/agricultural runoff) without In recognition of the value of these identifiable drainage channels or natural resources, the City authorized patterns, both contribute pollutants to the preparation of a comprehensive waterbodies. Water Quality Management Plan and the creation of a special task force to review The City recognizes the impact of the issues and oversee the process nonpoint source pollution on not only associated with the preparation of this the Minnesota River, but all waterbodies plan. In conjunction with the in Eagan. Eagan adopted a Water preparation of the 1990 Water Quality 8 5/PUBLIC UTILITIES PLAN ELEMENT Management Plan, the City authorized 2) For waterbody classification, the task the revision and update of its force designated each waterbody Stormwater Management Plan. By according to its intended use as a combining the analyses of these two recreational waterbody or treatment plans during the same time frame, the basin. The classification included City was assured that both management four classes of recreational plans would be compatible and able to waterbodies and two classes of handle the quantity and quality of treatment basins. surface water runoff in the most efficient and effective manner possible. 3) Management criteria were established for each class of In recognition of the completion and waterbody, with minimum standards implementation of this comprehensive a waterbody must meet to be Water Quality Management Plan, the considered usable for recreation or City of Eagan was awarded the treatment. Regional Policy Implementation Award by the Metropolitan Council in February 4) Policies and recommendations were 1991. developed by the Task Force using the information gathered analyzed A six-step process was used to develop and categorized in the first three this plan, including 1) resource steps of the plan process. inventory, 2) water body classification, 3) management criteria, 4) policies and 5) A capital improvements program was recommendations, 5) capital developed to address the most improvements, and 6) public pressing water quality priorities of involvement. the City. 1) The resource inventory identified 6) To elicit pubic input and educate Eagan's 350 wetlands and the water those affected by the plan, the Task quality of Eagan lakes. This Force presented the water quality information was entered into a management strategies to the City computerized database and summary Council and various City statistics were generated that commissions and committees. characterized the water quality for many of Eagan's lakes and ponds GOALS: over time. • To minimize the need for future lake 9 5/PUBLIC UTILITIES PLAN ELEMENT restoration programs. neighboring municipalities which drain into the City. This plan includes a • To promote the reduction of layout of the storm sewer trunk system phosphorus loading to water bodies. and ponding areas with major and minor drainage districts defined. Pond POLICIES: high water levels and the amount of storage required in each pond have Policies to fulfill these goals are set forth been established. The size and in Chapter 4 of the 1990 Water Quality capacity of the proposed and existing Management Plan, and are considered trunk storm sewers are also shown in incorporated in this Plan Element by this this plan. reference. During the preparation of the 1990 Stormwater Management Plan, special attention was given to the water quality D. S T O R M W A T E R of the system. Ponds that were MANAGEMENT identified and classified by the City of Eagan Water Quality Task Force were considered to determine potential The stormwater drainage plan for the ponding facilities that can be used to . City of Eagan was first developed in improve the water quality of the system. 1965. In 1972, a more detailed study These ponding facilities are listed in was prepared utilizing two foot contour Appendix H of this plan. topographic maps. The entire City was divided into major and minor drainage The topography of the City of Eagan areas and the necessary trunk storm allows the hydrological division of the sewer facilities were outlined for each. natural watershed to be similar to the The 1972 report has been re-evaluated City's official boundaries. Due to and revised periodically to reflect topographic features and for practical development and land use changes, purposes the major watershed was most recently in 1990. divided into 10 subdistricts, to facilitate its hydrological analysis. The 1990 Stormwater Management Plan, The City's drainage is generally from prepared by Bonestroo, Rosene, Anderlik, and Associates, Inc., presents east to west. Four major lakes—Thomas a comprehensive stormwater drainage Lake, Blackhawk Lake, Fish Lake, and plan for the City and parts of LeMay Lake--regulate approximately 50 • 10 5/PUBLIC UTILITIES PLAN ELEMENT percent of the City's stormwaters. the Gun Club Watershed Management These lakes drain by gravity to the Organization, and the intent of the Minnesota River. Holland Lake is Eagan Water Quality Management Plan another major lake located in the south (see Part 5.0 of this Element). part of the City . tt has a total drainage area of 2,885 acres and is considered to GOALS: be a landlocked lake that will not contribute any stormwater to the City's • To maintain or improve water quality storm system during peak storm in all protected waters and conditions. This drainage area is designated ponds. located in the Dakota County Lebanon Hills Park where no development is • To reduce to the greatest practical anticipated to occur in the future. extent the public capital expenditures for stormwater management An ultimate storm drainage system for the entire City is presented in the 1990 • To minimize flooding, erosion and Stormwater Management Plan. The sedimentation. ultimate system includes eight main trunk outlets to the Minnesota River. • To promote groundwater recharge. The ponding areas are designed for a 100-year storm, while the pipes are • To preserve fish and wildlife habitats. designed for a 5-year or 10-year storm. Overland drainage routes and ponding • To preserve and improve water areas are designed for protection from recreational facilities. a 100-year storm of 3.0 inches of rain in one hour or 6.0 inches in 24 hours. • To maintain or improve natural water courses. The Metropolitan Surface Water Management Act, passed by the POLICIES: Legislature in 1982, required the formation of watershed districts and Policies to fulfill these goals are set forth preparation of watershed management in Appendix F of the 1990 Stormwater plans. The City of Eagan is almost Management Plan, and are considered entirely within the Gun Club Lake incorporated in this Plan Element by this Watershed. The 1990 Stormwater reference. Management Plan satisfies the requirements of this law, the goals of 11 (Pi M E M O R A N D U M TO: Tom Hedges, City Administrator FROM: Kristy Marnin, Senior Planner DATE: April 29, 1991 SUBJECT: May 7, 1991 City Council Agenda Item - Additional Info Amendment to the Public Utilities Plan Element of the Comprehensive Guide Plan The City Council is being requested to consider an amendment to the Public Utilities Plan Element of the Comprehensive Guide Plan. In addition to the information as provided in the Advisory Planning Commission staff report regarding this matter, it should be noted that City Council approval of this item is subject to Metropolitan Council review and comment. Given that the proposed amendment is a major plan amendment, the Metropolitan Council will likely conduct a full 90-day review and may possibly require some modifications to this amendment. In addition, the Metropolitan Waste Control Commission (MWCC) will be concurrently reviewing the sanitary sewer section of the Plan Element, and also the Comprehensive Sewer Policy Plan. As such, the City Council should be advised that once the Metropolitan Council and MWCC reviews have been completed, this amendment will be returned to the City Council for its final adoption. Provided no significant changes to the amendment are required by the Metropolitan Council or MWCC, the amendment could be back for final adoption by the City Council by late Summer or early Fall. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please advise. cc: Dale Runkle Jim Sturm /f7 Page 2/EAGAN ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES APRIL 23 , 1991 they ,ave no problem with this and in fact support him. He would like to see •awn shops allowed in General Business districts. Chairman Graves felt that the biggest concern was the outd••r storage. Commission Member Merkley stated that he thought paw shop locations shoul• be either Community Shopping Districts or General Business. He is -trongly against outside storage and .uld like to see a condition a• •ed for no storage if pawn shops - e allowed in General Business. Commission Member ' ller remarked that paw- shops are similar to other retail businesses - d should be treat--- like one. Commission Member Hoeft concurred w' - Commission Member Merkley. Chairman Graves stated tha - nei• - •orhood business is not appropriate. A discussion occur -• egarding the other alternatives. Trygg moved, Hoeft seconder , mo ion to amend the Eagan City Code, Chapter 11 , Land Use Regulations (Zo 'ng) to allow pawn shops as a conditional use in General :usiness di- ricts. Chairman Graves an. Commission Member Filer felt that the motion should also allow paw- shops as a permitted e in Community Shopping Center districts . Trygg and H ft voted in favor; Graves, Mille and Merkley voted against the mo ion. The motion failed 3-2 . Miller owed, Merkley seconded, motion to amend th- Eagan City Code, Ch ter 11, Land Use Regulations (Zoning) to allow awn shops as a c ditional use in General Business districts and as permitted use i Community Shopping Center districts. All favored, except Trygg who opposed. COMPREHENSIVE GUIDE PLAN AMENDMENT REVISING THE PUBLIC UTILITIES ELEMENT - CITY OF EAGAN Chairman Graves opened the next public hearing of the evening regarding a Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment to the public utilities element which updates the public utilities element to / c10 Page 3/EAGAN ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES APRIL 23 , 1991 1990/91 and which revises the public utilities element for conformance with metropolitan system plans. Kristy Marnin presented an overview of the staff report and a brief background summary. She informed the commission members that when the Metropolitan Council revises one of its metropolitan system plans, the City must also. If the City does not do this the Metropolitan Council can deny future development proposals. She stated that this amendment is important because it gives the City policies and goals for guiding and reviewing the public utility systems in the City. Merkley moved, Trygg seconded, the motion to approve an amendment to the Eagan Comprehensive Guide Plan which amends the Public Utilities Plan Element. All voted in favor. SKY VIEW ADDITION - LAHNER-DUNN airman Graves opened the next public hearing of the evening' regar g a Preliminary Plat consisting of three lots on approxim ely 16. 4 Agricultural acres located along the east44ide of Dodd Road a'h* south of Farm Road in the SW 1/4 of Section, 6. City Planner;aim Sturm presented a brief overvie of the application. He noted that 300 feet is the required lot width and that Lot 3 only has a `Width of 250 feet. Lot 3,,,►is 5. 4 acres and because of this staff felt-4hat the lot widt 'would not be a problem, and a variance should be giv The applicant, Ed Dunn, 3304 W- tr03rd Street, Rosemount, stated that City Planner Jim Sturm had su .- ed the application well and that he was available to answer a ques 'ons. Larry Springer of 675 Fare -oad was concer about the marsh area in the NE corner of Lo 1. He wanted to know at the plans were for this area. Nancy Gustafson, , :22 Dodd Road, commented that she w very happy with this pro..sal. Ed Dunn add -ssed the issue of the marsh area in the NE corne He stated tha it will remain the way it is. Agenda Information Memo May 7, 1991 City Council Meeting PRELIMINARY PLAT/SKYVIEW ADDITION G. Preliminary Plat, Skyview Addition/Lahner-Dunn, Consisting of Three Lots on Approximately 16.4 AG (Agricultural)Acres Located Along the East Side of Dodd Road and South of Farm Road in the SW 1/4 of Section 36--At its regular meeting of April 23, the Advisory Planning Commission held a public hearing to consider a preliminary plat for the Skyview Addition as described above. For additional information relative to this application, please refer to the Community Development Department staff report which is enclosed n pages � througl..)2-for your review. Also enclosed on pageQ. througl o 7 is a copy of the Advisory Planning Commission minutes in this regard. The APC is recommending approval of this application. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the preliminary plat for Skyview Addition for Lahner-Dunn, consisting of three lots on approximately 16.4 (Agricultural) acres located in the SW 1/4 of Section 36 as presented. I �� SUBJECT: PRELIMINARY PLAT SKY VIEW ACRES APPLICANT: IAHNER-DUNN LOCATION: SW 114 OF SECTION 36 EXISTING ZONING: A (AGRICULTURAL) DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: APRIL 23, 1991 DATE OF REPORT: APRIL 15, 1991 COMPILED BY: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT APPLICATION SUMMARY: An application has been submitted by Lahner-Dunn requesting a Preliminary Plat of 16.39 acres for three approximately five acre lots zoned Agricultural. LOCATION & LAND USES: The proposed lots are located in the SW 1/4 of Section 36. The future development is east of Dodd Road and Lebannon Hills Regional Park, south of Farm Road, west of Highway 3, and north of the Rosemount V.F.W. and additional Agriculturally-zoned land. The surrounding land uses are park to the west, single family and commercial to the north, and agriculture and commercial (V.F.W.) to the south. EXISTING CONDITIONS: The site is currently unplatted vacant land. It is a hilly, grassy field with a pond in the northeast corner of the site which is located on Lot 1. DEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL & SITE PLAN: The gross area for the site is 16.39 acres. Lots 1 and 2 are 5.1 acres each; Lot 3 is 5.4 acres. The area is not served by City utilities so each lot will have a well and septic system. There will not be any site grading except for the individual building sites, as needed. Both Lots 1 and 2 meet all zoning requirements; Lot 3 is approximately 250' wide. The minimum lot width in an Agriculture zoning district is 300'. A Variance to the lot width for Lot 3 shall be approved with the platting. All other requirements have been met. Lot 1 could take its access from Farm Road or Dodd Road. Lots 2 and 3 will take access from Dodd Road. No direct access shall be permitted from Highway 3. • GRADING/DRAINAGE/EROSION CONTROL: The existing topography of this site ranges from a low elevation on the northeast corner of this site of approximately 923 to a high elevation of approximately 975 in the northwest portion of proposed Lot 3. The low area in the northeast corner of the site is a 1.5 acre wetland that contains cattails around the edges and open water in the middle. The drainage from this site is to Dodd Road to the west or to the wetland to the northeast. Approximately 5.1 acres of the site drains to the small ditch along the east side of Dodd Road. The 5.1 acres will produce a flow of 11 cfs during a 5 year rainfall event. The City would recommend that the ditch along the east side of Dodd Road be regraded and improved to better handle the runoff and prevent the continued erosion that now occurs to the shoulder of the road and this ditch. It is also proposed that this runoff be collected into a storm sewer system and conveyed easterly underground across Lot 1 to the wetland or pond in the northeast corner of Lot 1. The construction of this storm water to the pond will divert direct drainage away from Pond LP-22, which is a Class I (Direct Contact) Waterbody located within Dakota County Park. The three driveways for these lots will require culverts to prevent impeding the flow in the east ditch along Dodd Road. A detailed grading, drainage and erosion control plan shall be prepared in accordance with current City standards. The drainage from the east half of the site goes to the wetland in the northeast corner of Lot 1 which will be designated as Pond LP-23.1. This pond is not currently identified in the City's Storm Water Management Plan. The pond is identified on the Corps of Engineers National Wetland Inventory. The pond currently receives the flow out of Pond LP-23,which is a nutrient trap on the east side of STH 3. Also, 3.7 acres of residential property along the north side of Farm Road drains to Pond LP-23.1. The outlet for Pond LP-23.1 is through a ditch that drains westerly along the south side of Farm Road. The flow in this ditch drains through a 24" CMP culvert under Dodd Road to the west and into the Dakota County Park property and into Pond LP-22. Water Quality: The western boundary of the proposed 16.39 acre Sky View Addition runs along Old Dodd Road which forms part of the eastern boundary of Lebanon Hills County Park. The Park contains a number of Class I water bodies which are intended to support direct contact recreation. One of those water bodies (LP-22) lies within 500 feet of the northwest corner of the proposed subdivision and currently receives runoff from 5.1 acres of the area to be developed. A wetland (Pond LP-23.1) in the northeast corner of Lot 1 receives runoff from the remaining 11.4 acres of this site. \°\A The objective of water quality treatment requirements is to protect the quality of Pond LP- 22. Field review and modeling indicate that all runoff from the proposed development must be directed to the wetland on Lot 1 for treatment before release to Pond LP-22 (refer to discussion on drainage in previous section). The discharge point into the wetland should be as far away as possible from the wetland's outlet in its northwest corner. In no case should the discharge point be closer to the outlet than the wetland's southwest corner. In addition, the wet pond volume of the wetland should be increased by 1 acre-foot. Finally, the emergent vegetation around the wetland's outlet should remain undisturbed. UTILITIES: No water main or sanitary sewer service is available to the proposed development. The development is proposing onsite well and septic systems to serve each platted parcel. The development will be responsible for obtaining all City,County and State approvals/permits associated with well and septic system installation. STREETS/ACCESS1CIRCULATION: No driveway access is proposed from the easterly adjacent State Trunk Highway #3. Local street access is readily available from Farm Road and Dodd Road on the north and west, respectively. Farm Road and Dodd Road are currently 24' wide bituminous surface rural section roadways. These streets will need to be upgraded to current City standards when the condition of the road deteriorates or when future subdividing occurs. EASEMENT/RIGHT-OF-WAY/PERMITS: No additional right-of-way dedication is anticipated for Dodd and Farm Roads. Additional drainage easements may be required along Dodd Road if the upgraded ditch will be constructed outside of the right of way of Dodd Road. The final plat shall dedicate a ponding easement over Pond LP-23.1 up to the 100 year HWL of the pond. The design of the HWL of the pond should be based on fully developed conditions of the tributary drainage basins. Also, the water quality requirements for the area should be incorporated into the design of the water levels of the pond. The final plat shall also dedicate a 20' wide easement over the proposed storm sewer line that will drain the east ditch of Dodd Road to Pond LP-23.1. Furthermore, the final plat shall provide a drainage and unlit) easement over the existing ditch system that drains Pond LP-23.1 to the west to Dodd Road. The development is responsible for obtaining all regulatory agency permits within the appropriate time frame as required by the affected agency. FINANCIAL OBLIGATION - Skyview Preliminary Plat Based upon the study of the financial obligations collected in the past and the uses proposed for the property, the following charges are proposed. The charges are computed using the City's existing fee schedule and connections proposed to be made to the City's utility system based on the submitted plans. Improvement Use Rate Quantity Amount Sanitary Sewer Trunk S.F. $1,465/A 16.39A $24,011 Water Trunk S.F. $1,536/A 16.39A $25,175 Storm Sewer Trunk S.F. $.068/S.F. 713,948S.F. $48,548 Total $97,734 Areas will be reduced for ponding easements granted. This will cause a corresponding decrease in the financial obligation. _ \ V SKY VIEW ACRES CONDITIONS: 1. These standard conditions of plat approval as adopted by Council action on July 10, 1990 shall be complied with: B1, B2, B4, Cl, C2, D1, El, Fl, 01, H1 2. A Variance to the minimum lot width for Lot 3 shall be approved. 3. No direct access shall be permitted from Highway 3. 4. The development shall construct a ditch along the east side of Dodd Road. Driveway culverts will also be necessary where the driveways cross the ditch. 5. The development is required to intercept the site runoff in the east ditch of Dodd Road and convey it easterly to newly designated Pond LP-23.1 at the southwest corner of Trunk Highway 3 and Farm Road. 6. The developer will be required to increase the wet pond volume of Pond LP-23.1. by 1 acre foot. 7. The well and septic systems shall conform to City, County and State standards. STANDARD CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL A. Financial Obliciations 1. This development shall accept its additional financial obligations as defined in the staff's report in accordance with the final plat dimensions and the rates in effect at the time of final plat approval. B. Easements and Rights-of-Way 1. This development shall dedicate 10' drainage and utility easements centered over all common lot lines and adjacent to private property or public right-of-way. 2 . This development shall dedicate, provide, or financially guarantee the acquisition costs of additional drainage, ponding, and utility easements as required by the alignment, depth, and storage capacity of all required public utilities and streets located beyond the boundaries of this plat or outside of dedicated public right-of-way as necessary to service this development or accommodate it. 3 . This development shall dedicate all public right-of-way and temporary slope easements for ultimate development of adjacent roadways as required by the appropriate jurisdictional agency. 4 . This development shall dedicate adequate drainage and ponding easements to incorporate the required high water elevation necessitated by City storm water storage volume requirements. C. Plans and Specifications 1 . All public streets and utilities necessary to provide service to this development shall be designed by a registered professional engineer in accordance with City codes, engineering standards, guidelines and policies. 2 . A detailed grading, drainage, erosion, and sediment control plan must be prepared in accordance with current City standards prior to final plat approval. 3 . This development shall insure that all temporary dead end public streets shall have a cul-de-sac constructed in accordance with City engineering standards. STANDARD CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL PAGE TWO 4 . A detailed landscape plan shall be submitted on the proposed grading plan. The financial guarantee shall be included in the Development Contract and not be released until one year after the date of installation. 5. All internal public and private streets shall be constructed within the required right-of-way in accordance with City Code and engineering standards. D. Public Smnrovements 1. If any public improvements are to be installed under a City contract, the appropriate project must be approved at a formal public hearing by Council action prior to final plat approval . E. Permits 1 . This development shall be responsible for the acquisition of all regulatory agency permits in the time frame required by the affected agency.. F. Parks and Trails Dedication 1 . This development shall fulfill its parks dedication requirements as recommended by the Advisory Parks and Recreation Commission and approved by Council action. G. Water Quality Dedication 1 . This development shall be responsible for providing a cash dedication in addition to/in lieu of ponding requirements in accordance with the criteria identified in the City 's Water Quality Management Plan. H. Other 1 . All standard platting and zoning conditions shall be adhered to unless specifically granted a variance by Council action. Advisory Planning Commission City Council Approved: August 25, 1987 September 15, 1987 Revised: July 10, 1990 plataprv. con • LTS *2 vc,\5;\ ''qr.4_MILLS PAM �'� ALLAN 7, 1 /. 1 y NW 0 NE , . ...//4.1-' Street Map ^ :,. .....-,:yii, L• -15 n r 4. > t� SE t. J11111.11111A <V' ,, (l C' -- { \, 1 R i 'f'. r'4:.C Q if".1' A `;, I - - , Zoning Map :} ';�!aims __-:-:.- t, , A -. . --'A'7' sil • ,�r J _! • ,4 i . Comp Guide Plan Map D-1 ilf i ';..1::1 eff:P.. O t :..7 s-,:.:,:,„.„"......_,/ -e.. \...d.. N,,,,! \.\•.. -.. .. \ .s. ; i;.... 1 ...., ... . . .... --„ ,..;:, , , 1 • , . , t.;"/. ',„ \.1 ' - ,. • '•`• '...... :... o ,! ..... II -• I `. -... • P..- ---_,.._. 1117? 4/M1N \ \4 )Z.Ar.' ''.. ■_../ • '...\ :'''. '1):26ii-, -Airl5".:‘ irrsj-s..-----Vi W L:1*(1'.,,;) 1 ::tili ..a.....4. .- r. . 3 2T.....r...1- ' ''\ \111r\. ■ —.,,,, _../.• \-3 .. ,,) _.)...'3- \-. ..%, \ \ vli-r \ \ I,- - I ' ... -...,,,, ... „.. '1 ;AI.6: ,■._., • - , 1.11 , , 1 , , .. -, N " . 1 6...._......1.-.---L•w• — . , ■ \I ........"---r-j-.--.."• e..7.... ''' \ \ \\:' . — '. ‘‘i \ ., ) ., .6% • i. ,-.1.■.. •71.E.---7---ta....r.fz. ...---061.:•Li.4 ,,,..- ,77;•/,7 . ) i..-;• (111 L--' \ \.'-1--, .i'i'y 1•• ; is \.. efs: --I ,s, . .„ , \._,..j..-7.....: 1-. •• d. --.' ••■ rt. c------___. s. / 1 • . ,• t:,.., c., .•; 1 ..... ' ft ‘ .... . , ( b ...,---- / .-----3-- ._-__!.............J .-a-c.. ..Y---..1.....w.-..............4.___. i ( i• ''' ( •_3 i _ . • , ---„....--________.: J ---__ - ...—__ .....- ...4....., s . -. . .' s ' ". .--- ......--...'. ..... ===ROlt . t - atir---. , ,.. __L___ •. ! ,._, .z_i, ...,22.., -,k t,%,,,e,,,...%,,i . -„,„,,..... \ .1; \ \`: ').,.__\.,\_,..;...--z----.-...;:.-1 .%•••;:,.i' .;,...4— --:- -4--, .• -----=—_----'---,:-:+, ..`,., •,1:::. p : ••... \. :. -.„.. --.2=----:'• —_____ ' '''_,_ ' ..t•s•17rS. -.:•••: 77 47els'7 • ' 7 j.'s ••147-7-.-- N %.1 , Ns . ‘ ,i i i • .1....-ii7T-.....-, • SN -----.77-.Z.--4.'• 7.--..''.-1.7f.:1••' i 4 ./ '...'s. --''') • • '4 .••• i • \\„, •-.1...,.... ..?...".745h. •-\". %.,.',T--i.i:,-,•74.,,' /,' /1 tiEN:t■:;1".\* ..4 ' -f:2'...\. 1.-I'D 1:!. 41 /-I/ ; 11- / ( . N.. ._• , ,(.....y N'„, „ ,L4 :4; .... , .. t\ / \ ..1,• . /,' • ',r. I iill 1 1.1,, •1 . . •.1.,,,t,„,_ - 7# / • ' ' li ,1 ,,I. ' 4 / / i - ---.. •,\• \_ • *, // ., ) ,,7 ;/ ,,,, --- ....------ -,\ SCALE1eNcbt = 00 FEET i /42,/,/- /,) 11 ie--,..----- ',71,...:=Z...........' —......,....;"---.2..7........‘...,,,..,..,,,...... .....'4••••-■•••••5••• '''. ', I' ' I rt --- .,,, L.,';;,.7, -, ; / ,k0 •, \ —:.--..------...:-=:-.,..- L,s -_.-......L--_.. , ; , /1.0 11 t!! , } 7::_,.......„..f>............... .._,..._."'. ....-,..//:_i'iy. ,/■',2! / ,., .. .\......:-2.1".....-:-..--..... ...... .,,,,z...,,,,:...,,.,......:-\,..,.__ - : ! it' HII 1 ftil \ . •7• '-.- 415/ / iii`iii;.1,'.,-;--<-----":"."--4--:_,..---- .. ---4.:------',' /..".....- - ,•------ .6----"---",::..„-...-:---:::"-------; -.1, ,\,\,, ii\ ";\11 if .,.:,.,•-,..c.... I /, ----- Z-:'(,....,..... .-....„. .,--.*:- . .,1 i , • ...„...„/ ..,.. , ...... r.14%-_..--- ) 1\■ 1 '- -,.. ,/,•,,,,.../././ /// ,. ... ■ __.--- -- -,:..•--- .„...........-n.,i \. 'Y. t f\, .....---' ....., .....,...,..:7.- •.../...............!..!-----. ,, •P' ‘'' /(//./Xx rs., '''''.•••••. 17.1)' \ .• i f•;,•. -.I,! I .,./ //r i ,,,,/,/,;• ....... .., ,...• es -• • -••:•'';'';'......V..'...'• Z' g • -..:2-27 -,:•-,!...:„.•-:-. , ,,,,, •,., , \ 0 -, -. -X-• ,=-- --s. 1 4.. _et!0_,....:- c- -__. ...,-...---:--._---:--..__-_--- -. ..3- --, II • ,-.,-,- ,- 7- - - ....::::,,_. ,_ • •e. ■- / I 111k,,?: ' ' _.• , ( ,, ,, • , :i 1.',. ,‘,-,..---... /I f.•'. ,j,/-,I' I - ', '., 11 i -..., _ c ....: ..... / le, ( .,, . , .74e)... ....... ,, ......... * .„ . .... • ,,, 1 , 8 , m. r, • , v \.- I, .„.........--,,. . :.... \\ , a ... • ,... ..-....:„...-1- ...) \ . :;-:7.46-•_..,...- .. -- - • , ,i- -• ., • ------....„... N / .- 1.• 1 - • :::........ .........-•••••-• ' .1 ./ f 1 ..- V17.W. 1... i ..... .... ■••• L. ..,,,S.... ••■(1.91. I ' tr...4"..'e '4" \,•• — — ..-- -- Ii....-. -..... i.....,,- / _ . • i :_ 10114.-111` - Z--- :-....„.....," 17' ,.' " '' • *WU i'...• i u. '' ''' s*, i• , _ -...ai•I P. E.1. °'', r . '... V . ... / •0, 1 , . -, 1 i.e.") .... ••, /- . • ..,.,,, ,.., . / - / Aw• . ' -14)-7 '4 F.W. i..' 1 1 7--e 71 e' #4.! --.--.:_; r MN= '1% ' `r ...,, 1 t ,....,. , 0 ...D.,...1.5.,.. C.1 r .. 423.70 13 WNN, F•aily Illot••I I . . •• 1.50••• tit wet,••••••••••1 tag city utilttios. t...-0, tem will have indawfdlla well and loin.o ',este., Pr•s•nt 6 PrOl...d 3.1An hit. opactinq Bill he done. tact, lot 1.511 mor.r• I ts 2.oron9• kw'cults,. buildin.; hitt. a,•••••••*.d. . • Deter ipt.eon, • • ' •- • toot part at tn. SOuth••., Wetter of Si,. South..., Nate., or Section IS, mos. of Oroo.,.,,,,n; .1.,,,I. in, 1991 Townsnfr 27, 5•1,4c 23. Dakota ,70ip,y, Hint...Ws lying •wet•fl.) of tat. . • - ...steely right of why line of State 7'Unit Highway NO. 3.• easterly of the cantor line of Doll m ow mad and north of uhf following deacrits•O lint; Commencing at the soutiwast corner el GOvteNIN•nt Let I, 14,t3PO S. ..t......h,r . •- • • • . II,. Pang. 19; tnene• Snot' HI ri.ge.e, 3,assures 2) Poronsio West 1•••■••••d ... - ••• . NAtinql along the ,outi. :fn. of Paid Ge•vernwesit tat 1 • dis aaaaa of 31e.2€ fort to the .•••••eli -91, of way line of State Trunk 1119,..•3• , No. 3: thence. cont....my Sou. • P6 o•st..., 34...wt., 23 aer.nris west ' •.lons sae,. south .....1 Of Zu.ernment tat I. • distance of 110C.0r feet, thence torte. 1: degrees P.oinuter 53 second. List • distance of 530.30 tees- Shear, sort:. PP 4-green 35 situates 23 **ponds Sala • distance of . 40€ Oh feet St 0`". ...ff.,11 •felff ti way line of said State Trunk Highway - No. 3 arid the roInt of 1..q trilling of the line to to descrfes..1; tHant-• Sou, St degree, 3, 11,111111.CS 23 maraud'. Weft a distinct of 3793.70 feet, 0' A ...., of lens, to Ow renter line of Dodd Pond and said line the, terninateng. DELMAR H. SCHWANZ cur, ht.., 1.-• '‘. a - . sok.Vowl,0•1 Mt • A OOPSit.11. house location IM,M•111 WWII.I OM 11,.0•••••■••■••• Sca I* !Ct a'(. , .1 an'. • tanglIgulw ROIPI•7 MAN NOUNKTJNY iNV•iit1101•WY 11111423•IPM Le• • ' , •••••• $umvuoors croupricAn • .. . FINANCIAL OBLIGATION __ . . • II • .-_ •1,..1.....\ -_ , • • • :-. ... . 1 ' I \ '. • . • s 's • -- .--\t 7 ... -., /..,,I. •-• 4 "•••■., ... • ‘ . , / 1 1 t ..... / ••.,■■ A' I I VI 4.3 \el-A- -. ‘....• i: 0 •nec)1 /4 1..(Y 1. kr„ _ • A I ..-.... . • 7 -.:- • c17-. • -• yl, /VI -,--=1..-- •••11.!--- -- --!----.4",::.----,... •..1; \ \ 1 - (s ‹,-,...\ (------..,-) , %.-.---,-;-,—,.—,4:, :::-.7.-.7_:.. „.-To-nty-7--,*'-- -- Lk, .",1 \ , i.: .. I •; \‘‘ \ C ,i,s,„..:,:in,, ..,-k 1 ..,e,r.-i,j; ..-=-r-7-'7:-7-:.r'--:'' • ' ,, \\ - -r- ,..,7-_-. .. \-...7,-•::: ‘ P',...2 "...r."'."7 .. •.:.:.:.:.:.:.:..... .. - il 1 • ''' . -2..,-- ' k:__--"`..------t-s .:•,-.7:7....,71-•.:-:,,--c .. ; ii ,...... ..1.:. ..„........,,..,:..:.,...:,,...:;,:"........,„: .,.:.)..:.;,,..:::.:):.:‘::.1:":1::::::::1;::.:;?.............:..::::::::i::...;:....:::::::::.7........::... i; ....,. ..,.....- . ..:-,\:-,-- ..., ---n-'.--..T. .7•-'-.1:7:-.t 4 p ,..: ?:::- 77..):: .:: ' :•..i.. ... ..it....:0;0+74., :•::. .?::: :::. 2- tiPt . N. -, -,.-:;77t-\-. ?l•-k4• •:-.■1i1 // ,,r4i.,:.::::::::::::::::::,:::::::::: :•::i::.. ..:i:•::. ii:::::•:.:::.::::1 :7,7::::kV:.::::::.*:::::::: 11 , :: , r) \i I-"it!' ' .17... ............L.•...1'.3:1 •••• •••••••4•*-'•:•:t:i•••'N1.-.••. ::•:N•.•....... . 1 • ii, ,..... ''')) .r....Y.•:::::::K::.::,:r.??0. ::::::: .•:•::•: ::::::.::".17:::::.f:::1:::?::.•'.::::::.. ,, II I • 1( 4;44411k r --•-•',- S:21. ( ii .K...:;::::;;;;.5.7t:;A:c•N ;::::::::•. ,; ‘,.. :K:•:::>:::::::::\::.: •ti i I I •i\ 1 ' ,Y •2. .:.*:•••••.....•••••••:::::::: .7 ::::::....:.•*.:.:.::: ::.:.::::::::::.:... ! ! , , ' .1-s --- , 7 ,1 •A ..f.:• ;?:!.. :::::::*77 ::i.•..• N;.0`,14:;;;;;;:::::::::: :::::'N..7: pt 1 i ) . ....: . . . " ls IA : • 1 • Fi ET) / I I 1,14 .1•::.':. :•::>.:'.'4:•-r.-....*::.:.:.,...•'.. : *t.4"1"*.,••••",re."*"•k;•'•S::::•::::::•••.•• . ' It 'to'. ;' . r -- ‘,/(...,,"/ .4 .:..:•..::::••.i...:••pil....LN;_:...,;:-..,."--e7.-"\-,,..' 7..- -M-- :-.:.::..* , . l'/--* 3' i''l ::::'..::: ::.: ::-,°,...:.•:..... ,: ••■••'r.t.:-?• ••-7-:.,:•!-L.,:*7.•;....:::::• I i —II ,__ ------.[:-..:: ,- ,. ..; .,'. ;;; ..:: : ::•,...._ -..., •• .• ‘,.. N.,,: t.:L. -•- ' ,••• _._ _ _ .__At....F--.....= - -._........-A.._--_ _---. --_-..-_ -•_,......--. --:::-,,-, cll7 1 , . ', _ . • • • -4 ---- --:•. — C,.•6 ■ e''' \ / , ' '. . .7--.1.... ..'.•,::'''' r:%*". .er'. :'" •• ' N–•••:::: , I.. N . •-•:'... '''' :/"'... .• ":•.'• • •.••■■•".., •" •• ...fl':•7•ZS,7' %‘ 1\I I'D i7 i "y' •••• ' i..-.ti...--',e"--: . /L,Lt..,.:•;.'.••••;./. .: :.'.:...,.•••••••••.:: '.7)..".........„"' •:.”........."4.....t..',.. .'.:..**'XI ,\ I I, ; ci, -'• • / 47'i • „../... ' K''-- 1 •• -.e'''' :, . • ,•:#••••;;;;;;;;;;;;4::.:.i.G. *••••/.•--"`'''..v...""•••••••••••■• \',••:•.• ••di v ''/ ' '-'-'•'''.1 - / ' '','44.' • • ••'!"•:•:.:•'•..•••••••:•• ,.'• •• •••• '-••,.... '..$;.. . .•:..•• : s • - , :‘ i/•• • ' ' /' iv(1,/, / i ri a ':,.4'/4/7. . :.;:": :.:_,..,:.:: :::::::::..t.:::.::::..-...::.1 :::.:..7:"!:.;:!1.1:.:.i:.:::.::i::.:..:::.::.... •-..:,r: 7 l:.d...„)) ( I' ‘ .:re-* i) ••/./.'...1•;/. . , 77:-.'••..: ::::::'.: ••••:':::t:•i:::::...*::V.:k:..*.:*.:. :.:.k...::::.:. .1,.1 . 1,1 ? 1-•••-------.••::„...----X::_e•""%d t".......-.%:,:-.-1—_.:‘ \ 1) ...s ' ' '. ••• ••..,._,-........,,,,,.:-....,.."••••••• .:•:• :::::: •is:::•. ::t.;:•.•:•:.:.:.•,,,,,•:•:: ::...:..:::.::::„.;.:.:.:.. . I - -- . .4-'1;...:7,1--.-0,.:::-.7.-:-----..,..,),, ' ' :::/?;.:•,A. ......-.,!:;:•: .•,:::::::. ...::::::.:1;::::::7::::;::::::::......s;:. ::.::.:::!...:-..7t: ::. ; ,1 ■ - ..-,0';;I:',,, - -,..--/-------: / - / .../.t. • :.:-.... ••••••-',..:•::::.:,...•:•: ,....t.::::::: :::i.:::::::. ,.:....i.r.....s,,v:g..:...::,:..•.::.,::::• .,,i ... - :•: .....,.:.,----/;,,- ,x• • . / / :. • .. 4...,.. ...-::,•"::•!:::.\..:: :1:::.‘::.,. :.:.:...„:44. •:.......... 7::...,,A,L.:2_i!:f... . ,, . ... :,..... 0 ii 1:7 .. , ./. %.„.. .... , ;,: ..0 : .:'.•,• il:: 5........ii:D: :: ...?.•.....:::::::::::::::::.:.•..•......:••••.,:::.::•./.7.:,::SS.,: ...11/11.:::: .:■..: ii , '9.- . ,' .' '1. ... ' .:":::: :::•::.:: ::::::"is;:17:.:.1.::'.::.. ..:.:....:::.•.:::•::.•.::..:.:.: •:•:•:,:,:,:i.:..:.•.F..::.:.:.:.:.:.....],\,..,;::'•::::...•::• ' . -1./ 1."4---- • • f-1:0f •••• . .:.::::',..il.''..*::'-:::..:•810 :::::.• .;/.•:.. ::::::: :::: ::::•.:1:ii:ii. ,.:•..r,. f::: :::::'•:::::;.::...:.:;•::::.:..N::■:::. , \ i •..1 -/-ID ,B-- , ::•'.7::::••.:::: :::,IL .", k;'-----.. 4P . :..... ...:::....:.::.::.:4•:::::..; ..:- :.....:...,:::::,,:;.,:i.::::....:.".:.:::::::::...t....,::: .•.:•:,:,:::::.......:,...,,,,,,,.:.. .::.:•::...:::::;:.::.;._: , , ... ' / W ,v •. •• •:........:•:• _....,..-.....-: ::....4-:-.,:-!.....:-..•...A... ::::•••••::: if. :::,..*::::::it::::: .:::::. ..:::,....:::!:::::::: ::...•: , , ill . . ....,.. --1" - :, ::::. ::::::::::: c........,.....,:•-•-•-•„,.....-::::.....:::::•:•:.:::*::. ::.:::•:::::: :,....1:....: ,::.::::::.............::......„..:::::.:.:....::., , /.42 ..■ ': ' ':::.:.:....:.i.-:::, ,=::..... “7it•..:•::.•: : .'4.•* 1:••:•*:.. : -•i I, 1..■ ' .•"•} '77 :. . .*:,.4•.. :;7‘. ••::,...........—••••••'%**:':".:•:•:•:•:•:••.': )'. :•:':•!': :- it/..:.:.:`.r.r1"1.41. t's' •:........... ...:.:. • , ' . .•':' ..01/114C•: ••,':':',-••••• •••••:•••••••••••••••.--:•44:.•••••••• :.■•:•.••:•:.:• •• ,..:.:.:-:.:.:.:.:.:..-..:4-: ....74....:..1.4.•ig L.1 , , . • • -- ...----IA• .4.. ' ::" AFAR. • •.•.• ..w..• ••• --A..- — „, - if'''' '.... •8. 1.2:::F ....... ..... ....1:.:.:.:..•IVO ■a . .:•. •t • • • • 4 • 1 . 1 le •d . 4 t ......• ,. i. . '.14'' 01 ar Pi 'll ....■ 0•...0. k: I \ ,....! / . k I 4- 61., % n ' fr. I /(-_,,.1..-.;T:.:r". ": . . ' -'4n V F W. • .i 1 / . . ,:.'r,- ,- 4..t.-... \ . -/ i "--...A.:: -..•. 1 ''..i. • aim . 1.- .. t .. ... 1 .. 4 •.. I ---.- • I . - •:::•:•:::•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:• SANITARY SEWER TRUNK _ ... .-. ......• WATER TRUNK STORM SEWER TRUNK • _ Page 3/EAGAN ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES APRIL 23 , 1991 1990/91 and ich revises the public utilities elem is for conformance wi • metropolitan system plans. Kristy Marnin pr- -ented an overview of the staff report and a brief background summar• She informed the commission members that when the Metropolitan Counc revises one/f its metropolitan system plans, the City must also. If t = City --oes not do this the Metropolitan Council can deny futur- -evelopment proposals. She stated that this amendment is impo an- •ecause it gives the City policies and goals for guiding a.: reviewi - the public utility systems in the City. Merkley moved, Trygg ,'conded, the motion to approan amendment to the Eagan Comprehens re Guide Plan which amends the Public. Utilities Plan Eleme . All voted ' favor. SKY VIEW ADDITION - LAHNER-DUNN Chairman Graves opened the next public hearing of the evening regarding a Preliminary Plat consisting of three lots on approximately 16 . 4 Agricultural acres located along the east side of Dodd Road and south of Farm Road in the SW 1/4 of Section 36. City Planner Jim Sturm presented a brief overview of the application. He noted that 300 feet is the required lot width and that Lot 3 only has a width of 250 feet. Lot 3 is 5. 4 acres and because of this staff felt that the lot width would not be a problem, and a variance should be given. The applicant, Ed Dunn, 3304 West 103rd Street, Rosemount, stated that City Planner Jim Sturm had summarized the application well and that he was available to answer any questions. Larry Springer of 675 Farm Road was concerned about the marsh area in the NE corner of Lot 1. He wanted to know what the plans were for this area. Nancy Gustafson, 4822 Dodd Road, commented that she was very happy with this proposal. Ed Dunn addressed the issue of the marsh area in the NE corner. He stated that it will remain the way it is. (740 3 Page 4/EAGAN ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES APRIL 23 , 1991 Commission Member Merkley asked that standard condition Al be added to condition #1. He saw no other problems. Commission Member Miller wanted condition #6 amended to state that the emergent vegetation around the wetland's outlet should remain undisturbed. Miller moved, Merkley seconded, the motion to approve the Preliminary Plat of 16. 39 acres for three approximately five acre lots zoned agricultural subject to the following conditions: 1. These standard conditions of plat approval as adopted by Council action on July 10, 1990 shall be complied with: Al , Bl , B2 , B4 , Cl, C2, D1, El, Fl, G1, H1 2 . A Variance to the minimum lot width for Lot 3 shall be approved. 3 . No direct access shall be permitted from Highway 3 . 4 . The development shall construct a ditch along the east side of Dodd Road. Driveway culverts will also be necessary where the driveways cross the ditch. 5 . The development is required to intercept the site runoff in the east ditch of Dodd Road and convey it easterly to newly designated Pond LP-23 . 1 at the southwest corner of Trunk Highway 3 and Farm Road. 6 . The developer will be required to increase the west pond volume of Pond LP-23 . 1 by 1 acre foot and the vegetation around the wetland's outlet will not be disturbed other than the raising of the water level. 7 . The well and septic systems shall conform to City, County and State standards. All voted in favor. CONDITIONAL DBE PERMIT - TRANS X Chairman Graves opened t e c meeting-�f he evening regarding a conditional use permit to all.©�a a truck—and„freight terminal in a Light Industrial district on Lot 6, Eagandale C-ent.er__..__ Industrial Park #2 located along Lone Oak Circle in the SW 1/4 of Section 2 . Agenda Information Memo May 7, 1991 City Council Meeting CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT/TRANS X/TRUCK AND FREIGHT TERMINAL H. Conditional Use Permit, Trans X, to Allow a Truck and Freight Terminal in an LI (Light Industrial) District on Lot 6, Eagandale Center Industrial Park #2 Located Along Lone Oak Circle in the SW 1/4 of Section 2--At its meeting of April 23, the Advisory Planning Commission held a public hearing to consider a conditional use permit for Trans X to permit a truck and freight terminal at the above referenced location. For additional information with respect to this application, please refer to the Community Development Department staff report which is enclosed on pages, -O (through. for your review. Also enclosed for your review on pages, / hrough is a copy of the APC minutes in this regard. The APC is recommending approval of thi application with the following qualifications: 1. Condition 4 was amended to read that an opaque fence or compact hedge is required to be provided along the west property line and that fences taller than six feet will require a special permit from the City Council. 2. Condition 11 was added stating that the developer shall protect the sanitary force main along the south property line. 3. Condition 12 was added requiring that the driveway shall have a concrete apron. For additional information in this regard, please refer to City Planner Sturm's memorandum enclosed on page ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny a conditional use permit for Trans X to allow a truck and freight terminal in an LI (Light Industrial) district in the above referenced location. 4=2,0 SUBJECT: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT APPLICANT: TRANS X LOCATION: LOT 6, EAGANDALE CENTER INDUSTRIAL PARK #2 EXISTING ZONING: I-1 (LIGHT INDUSTRIAL) DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: APRIL 23, 1991 DATE OF REPORT: APRIL 11, 1991 COMPILED BY: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT APPLICATION SUMMARY: An application has been submitted requesting a Conditional Use Permit to allow a truck and freight terminal in a Light Industrial zoning district. BACKGROUND: Trans X began operation in Winnipeg in 1957 and has been operating in the United States since August 1990 when they purchased M.W. Ediger Trucking. The applicant is currently leasing terminals in Chicago and Dallas. The Eagan facility will be the U.S. headquarters and will be run independently of the Canadian operation. Of the 140 people employed by Trans X in the United States, one hundred will be based in Eagan. The Eagan site will have approximately 75 trucks and 100 trailers, however 25 trucks and 50 trailers will actually be on site on average at one time. COMMENTS: The site is surrounded by E-Z Air Park on the north, Villaume Lumber on the east, warehouse leasing on the south, and City park land on the west. The City Code states that when any Industrial district abuts a residential, agricultural, or public facility (Parks) district, a fence or compact evergreen hedge not less than 6' in height shall be erected and maintained. The applicant will provide an opaque fence not less than 6' tall along the west property line. Should the applicant wish to construct a fence over 6' tall, the City Council will have to approve a Special Permit. The site in question has a total size of approximately 6.1 acres. The applicant is proposing a total building coverage of approximately 6%. The City Code allows a maximum of 35%. The site plan calls for a 3,250 sq. ft. office attached to a 6,500 sq. ft. terminal and a separate shop building of 6,600 sq. ft. Light Industrial building setback and parking requirements are met. The proposal also includes a motor fuel pump island. This activity and location will have to be approved by the Fire Marshal. The building will be constructed with decorative concrete block that will include brick trim and accents throughout all buildings on site. D_ C)(0 GRADING/DRAINAGE/EROSION CONTROL: A grading, drainage and erosion control plan was not submitted as part of this application. The development will be required to submit detailed plans for staff review with the grading permit or building permit submittal. City staff will review the grading, drainage and erosion control plan to ensure compliance with City requirements for minimum and maximum slopes,protection of adjacent properties, construction of temporary and permanent vegetation to control erosion and construction of silt fence to control erosion. According to the City's Comprehensive Storm Water Management Plan,this site is proposed to drain to the south to an existing 18" storm sewer in Lone Oak Circle. The capacity of the 18" storm sewer is approximately 15 cubic feet per second. With full development of the 7.91 acres of this site, the surface water runoff during a 5 year storm would be 24 cfs. The three existing developments on Lone Oak Circle currently drain to the 18" storm sewer and the runoff from these three developments is 54 cfs. So, if this applicant is allowed to develop this site and convey its surface water runoff to Lone Oak Circle, the total flow during a 5 year storm will be 78 cfs. The excess flow of 63 cfs would drain overland on Lone Oak Circle to Lone Oak Road and pond in the low point of Lone Oak Road. Two options for this development have been analyzed to provide for storm water drainage of the site. The first option for this site is to convey all site generated storm water runoff to a new pond prior to discharge into the existing City storm sewer system on Lone Oak Circle. The runoff from this site will require a pond with storage volume of 2.0 acre feet and a surface area at the normal water level of 0.5 acres to meet 100 year design standards. The flow out of the pond would be limited to a 1.0 cfs flow rate to the existing 18" storm sewer. The second option for this development is to petition the City to upgrade the storm sewer on Lone Oak Circle and provide ponding off-site. The City would prepare a feasibility report and then hold a public hearing to discuss the new storm sewer layout for the area and the proposed assessments for the tributary drainage area. If the second option is the preferred alternative for the development, then the public hearing would have to be held and the storm sewer improvement project approved by the City Council before a building permit could be issued. WATER QUALITY: The proposed site was analyzed for water quality requirements in accordance with the City's Comprehensive Water Quality Management Plan. The site is located within Watershed District E and the downstream pond is EP-1 which is classified as a nutrient trap. C3'0 If the surface water runoff from the 7.91 acres of this site was conveyed to a new pond, then the pond should be constructed to the following parameters: Wet Pond Volume = 2.95 acre feet Minimum surface area of pond = 0.5 acres at NWL • If these parameters are met, the water quality treatment requirements for this site will be met. UTILITIES: Sanitary sewer service of sufficient depth and capacity is readily available to the site in Lone Oak Circle. The sanitary sewer in Lone Oak Circle is a 9" VCP (clay) line that was constructed in 1969. A 6" sewer service line has been stubbed to the site off the 9" line in Lone Oak Circle. The developer shall protect the existing 18" sanitary sewer force main that runs along the south property line of this site. Water main service of sufficient pressure and capacity is readily available along the south property line of the site. An 8" (cast iron) CIP water main was constructed along the south property line in 1969 and the 8" line can be connected to provide water supply and fire protection to the site. The water main layout shall provide hydrants in locations that meet the City requirement of 250' radius for fire protection for an industrial site. STREETS/ACCESS/CIRCULATION: Street access to this site is readily available from Lone Oak Circle which is a 44' wide bituminous street with concrete curb and gutter. The driveway connection to this site at Lone Oak Circle will be required to be constructed with a concrete apron. City code requires that parking lots shall be surfaced with bituminous or concrete and the edge of the parking lots shall be constructed with a concrete curb and gutter. EASEMENTS/RIGHT-OF-WAY/PERMITS: The development will be required to provide the appropriate ponding easement for the new pond to incorporate the required high water level and storage volumes required. The City is requesting that a ten foot permanent easement over the existing 18" sanitary sewer force main be dedicated along the north side of the line. The location of the line should be field verified prior to the preparation of the easement. All regulatory agency permits shall be acquired within the appropriate timeframe as required by the affected agency. ; (5q FINANCIAL OBLIGATION - 2-CU-3-4-91 Trans X Based upon the study of the financial obligations collected in the past and the uses proposed for the property, the following charges are proposed. The charges are computed using the City's existing fee schedule and connections proposed to be made to the City's utility system based on the submitted plans. Improvement Project Use Rate Quantity Amount None* *If utility connections are made in Lone Oak Circle. tf:P- If approved, this Conditional Use Permit shall be subject to the following conditions: 1. Motor fuel operation shall be approved by the City Fire Marshal. 2. A landscape plan shall be reviewed and approved by staff prior to building permit issuance. 3. All trash and recycling containers shall be stored indoors. 4. Fences taller than 6' will require a Special Permit from the City Council. 5. All signage shall be subject to the one-time sign fee of $2.50/sq.ft. 6. All other applicable City Codes shall be adhered to. 7. A detailed grading, drainage, erosion and sediment control plan must be prepared in accordance with current City standards and approved by staff prior to issuance of a grading permit or building permit. 8. The storm sewer layout for this site shall be designed in accordance with the City's Stormwater Management Plan. 9. Current City Code requires that parking lots shall be surfaced with bituminous or concrete and the edge of the parking lot shall be constructed with a concrete curb and gutter. 10. The parking lot shall be constructed with concrete curb and gutter to contain all vehicles and to convey surface water runoff to the proposed storm sewer. b .,,..tee . '--0:3.,ji�•CyiC��1,....: • 1 n :illt„.'NE • lb 0.(i) .9 Rnrnicr r teal " ' < \ o T.F S 4! NO 7 JJ .ORC OAK RD _. - - (Go Rd Ile i61-1'--.. -- •" y ci jciur a, i p NE --- -. '"IffiF _ 8 l e U Qo - '. ( s;; t`,l -- gyp / I. r;241 4 . - .1} N I. ..r.r . •lCt7.. :,_ * _ _...3.. ...;,...„.. . i . ligielp 61 //4411/4 - -Tr �,i v-.4. '! .:- .* a . IGb `-z �e \-. fiEnr 'a - _� a i_ a fa° lss \.....7„.. . - -- � .�— _ - .-.\\\Iii' .... i•lictslt) (Al c 1 „ , .., ill . R., 1 D-+ • . • _______. Q. t .. _ _ _._. it. Cc Z . i I 045-4:0 .41,c Id, Ot/ ET i i •4 (1 Air lip ,o ,o x x n i Q Of1••00 A '- O 1 • . i ■ i go,A ,o w L ,L w. . - ' 4 Opp \ tEET w n rr" 1R s w # , C z S limi CPT .; E °.6 W / I Sr - —Or T i I x ' • • w w W V ! ,z `UMe I `� �.G'oo n 14 . • e.t-CC `\ V D ;514ez4g c '' O 1 v AgE 4 O _ a • W �., ... o J i 4\<(" . ..`E)i' peATAVAI/ i .o CITY TF •.•,• k EAGAN ett-oQ� FN9 STATION I i IOt hl Of I W7 IZ C) 1J • i Lc".JE 1,066 K- 7 0441, 02 ( ' •IRRi . • I. If ie E I -- .41.4.4. /H.. -- 0 ■ 4 I L ,v, ..I �_.... ,...., was reuse -----I H._...1 , . , 1..— •••\yrt i I — pi) )01g-3 L E P7J . Z 1.•441' .wr �....• p..•,r. I K >" ! , 1 .•II , . ____ ,_._ __,._. ___ = gir IIHH ...... = ........._---. --,_ r t- .. = K \ . ••••O...• C4 >< . . V rn CO i ;1 0 ;51 I 1 ■ . ' .411 Ale ;,i Vanney -- r r r TRtt�'�S .�..�,. ...OPT — 1 Associates """" """„�.� r. = �...� '- 1 • •rr� '_ii4�_ rm.•■•■•41.41 •••••■•••■ f a t L 1 • H i 4, -- Z >g _ I H,i) x a I 1 til V -r -T� LL - ___ � ! , _ • o I to _I n to I U 7 n_ G=0 C . - .. N in 4i N ..n O cu 8 O y r,- y I . . M :i} • of I il , SEVERSON,WILCOX& SHELDON, P.A. A PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATION ATTORNEYS AT LAW LARRY S.SEVERSON* KENNETH R.HALL JAMES F.SHELDON 600 MIDWAY NATIONAL BANK BUILDING "'SCOTT D.JOHNSTON J. PATRICK WILCOX' WREN M.SOLFEST MICHAEL G. DOUGHERTY 7300 WEST 147TH STREET CHRISTINE M. SCOTILLO MICHAEL E. MOLENDA" APPLE VALLEY, MINNESOTA 55124 ANNETTE M. MARGARIT (612) 432-3136 DANIEL M. SHERIDAN SHARON K HILLS TELEFAX NUMBER 432-3780 ALSO LICENSED IN IOWA OF COUNSEL LICENSED IN WISCONSIN JOHN OF E COUNSEL ."ALSO LICENSED IN NEBRASKA April 22, 1991 Mr. Thomas Hedges City Administrator City of Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Road P.O. Box 21199 Eagan, MN 55121 RE: Trans X Conditional Use Permit Our File No. 206-9443 Dear Mr. Hedges: Our offices has been asked to research the issue of whether, as a condition to the issuance of a conditional use permit, the City could impose upon the applicant a requirement to upgrade existing drainage facilities associated with the property and surrounding areas. Generally speaking, the conditional use permit is a product of the zoning ordinance and not connected to the subdivision ordinance. Whereas, zoning ordinances are not to be conditioned upon the happening or the doing of something. In a subdivision ordinance, items such as dedication and utility requirements are traditionally imposed upon an applicant seeking a plat or waiver of plat. Nonetheless, the conditional use permit as set forth under Section 11.40, subd. 4 , of the Zoning Ordinances provides as follows: The Planning Commission shall recommend a conditional use permit and the Council shall issue such conditional use permit only if it finds that such use at the proposed location: (1) will not be detrimental to or endanger the public health, safety or general welfare of the neighborhood or the city; (2) will be served adequately by essential public facilities and services, including streets, police and fire protection, drainage structures, refuse disposal, water and sewer systems and schools. . • Mr. Thomas Hedges April 22 , 1991 Page Two The applicant shall have the burden of proof that the use is suitable and that the above standards have been met. Also, the Planning Commission and the Council may attach whatever reasonable conditions they deem necessary to mitigate anticipated adverse impacts associated with these uses. Arguably, Section 11.40, subd. 4, broadens the context of zoning to include the type of conditions normally associated with subdivision approvals. However, we do not interpret the ordinance to allow for the carte blanche imposition of any condition upon the applicant. Section 11.40, subd. 4 , focuses on the use "e.g. outside storage" which is the subject of the conditional use permit and questions arise if that particular use meets the criteria of the ordinance and whether the use at the proposed location will be served adequately by essential public facilities. In imposing conditions upon a conditional use permit, the Council and Planning Commission may attach reasonable conditions, those being necessary to mitigate anticipated adverse impacts associated with the use. Reasonable conditions should be supported in the record. It is therefore our opinion, that upon reviewing an application for a conditional use permit, it is important to keep in mind that the use has been determined to be suitable under some circumstances. The reviewal of the application is to determine if the use is suitable at the proposed location. If the use at the proposed location does not meet the standards set forth in Section 11.40, subd. 4, a permit should be denied. If the use at the proposed location is suitable but will result in foreseeable adverse impacts, the Planning Commission and City Council may impose reasonable conditions to mitigate those impacts. However, in the event a problem exists irrespective of the use (e.g. undersized drainage facilities) , it is questionable whether the adverse impacts result from the requested conditional use. Care should be taken to document by findings how the use at the proposed location adversely impacts the City's system, that would warrant attaching conditions to the issuance of a permit. Sincerely, SEVERSON, WILCOX & SHELDON, P.A. /�'f - l ichael G. Dough"- ty MGD/djk G( 2 Page 4/EAGAN ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES APRIL 23 , 1991 Commission Member Merkley asked that standard condition A1?5e adde• to condition #1. He saw no other problems. Co . ission Member Miller wanted condition #6 amended to/ state that th- emergent vegetation around the wetland's outlet/should remain un. sturbed. ii Miller mo ed, Merkley seconded, the motion to app ove the Preliminary Pla . of 16. 39 acres for three approximately five acre lots zoned agricu tural subject to the following conditions: d 1. These stand, d conditions of plat approval as adopted by Council actio on July 10, 1990 shall/be complied with: Al , B1 , B2 , B4 , C2 , D1, El, Fl,fG1, H1 s 2 . A Variance to the mi 'mum lot yidth for Lot 3 shall be approved. - 3 . No direct access shall be � � :ermitted from Highway 3 . f 4 . The development shall cpiistru a ditch along the east side of Dodd Road. Driveway/culverts ill also be necessary where the driveways cross tie ditch. 5 . The development is' required to inter = •t the site runoff in the east ditch of` Dodd Road and convey 't easterly to newly designated Pond'LP-23 . 1 at the southwest orner of Trunk Highway 3 and/Farm Road. 6. The developer will be required to increase the est pond volume off. Pond LP-23 . 1 by 1 acre foot and the ve• etation around Zhe wetland's outlet will not be disturbed • her than the rising of the water level. 7 . T well and septic systems shall conform to City, County le State standards. A voted in favor. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - TRANS X Chairman Graves opened the next public meeting of the evening regarding a conditional use permit to allow a truck and freight terminal in a Light Industrial district on Lot 6, Eagandale Center Industrial Park #2 located along Lone Oak Circle in the SW 1/4 of Section 2 . ID - 1 Page 5/EAGAN ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES APRIL 23 , 1991 City Planner Jim Sturm presented an overview of the application. He stated that this application was very straight forward and that staff felt that the proposed use is compatible with the surrounding area. Bob Vanney, a representative of the applicant, stated that he was there to answer any questions. Jim Luzum, representing Villaume Lumber, was concerned about traffic control in the area. He was specifically concerned about the traffic turning onto Lone Oak Road from Lone Oak Circle. City Planner Jim Sturm replied that Lone Oak Road is part of a 5-year C. I .P. which includes upgrading this to a 4-lane road. Assistant City Engineer Mike Foertsch stated that he would contact Dakota County to find out when Lone Oak Road will be signalized. Larry Faber, a representative of Trans X, stated that during a 16-plus hour day approximately 80 trucks will be coming or going. Chairman Graves stated that this was low impact for an industrial area. Commission Member Merkley requested that condition #11 be added stating that the developer must protect the 18 ' existing sanitary sewer line. He also requested that condition #12 be added to require that the driveway be constructed with a concrete apron. Condition #4 should be amended to require the developer to construct an opaque fence or compact evergreen hedge along the west property line. Trygg moved, Merkley se:onded, motion to approve a conditional use permit to allow a truck and freight terminal in a Light Industrial zoning district subject to the following conditions: 1. Motor fuel operation shall be approved by the City Fire Marshal . 2 . A landscape plan shall be reviewed and approved by staff prior to building permit issuance. 3 . All trash and recycling containers shall be stored indoors. c;:1- ( g Page 6/EAGAN ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES APRIL 23 , 1991 4 . An opaque fence or a compact evergreen hedge not less than 6' tall will be provided along the west property line. Fences taller than 6' will require a Special Permit from the City Council. 5. All signage shall be subject to the one-time sign fee of $2 . 50/per sq. ft. 6. All other applicable City Codes shall be adhered to. 7 . A detailed grading, drainage, erosion and sediment control plan must be prepared in accordance with current City standards and approved by staff prior to issuance of a grading permit or building permit. 8 . The storm sewer layout for this site shall be designed in accordance with the City's Storm Water Management Plan. 9 . Current City Code requires that parking lots shall be surfaced with bituminous or concrete and the edge of the parking lot shall be constructed with a concrete curb and gutter. 10. The parking lot shall be constructed with concrete curb and gutter to contain all vehicles and to convey surface water runoff to the proposed storm sewer. 11 . The developer shall protect the existing 18 ' sanitary sewer force main that runs along the south property line of this site. The developer will be responsible for any damage done. 12 . The driveway connection to this site at Lone Oak Circle will be required to be constructed with a concrete apron. All voted in favor. PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AMENDMENT - BRADBURY GROUP, INC. Chairman Graves ed the next public of the evening regarding a Planned DevelopmentAmencme to allow signage modifications to the overall sign or the Rahncliff Crossings Planned Development loco ed-long the sout f Cliff Road in the NW 1/4 of Section 32 .. MEMORANDUM TO: DALE RUNKLE, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR . FROM: JIM STURM, CITY PLANNER DATE: APRIL 29, 1991 RE: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TRANS X At the April 23 Advisory Planning Commission meeting, a Conditional Use Permit to allow a truck and freight terminal along the north side of Lone Oak Circle was approved unanimously. The controller from Villaume (the adjacent property) was at the meeting and had some questions regarding the amount of truck traffic the proposed user would have. It appears that there would be less than 100 trips, including all employees, in a 16-18 hour work day. It was also noted that Lone Oak Road would be upgraded into a four lane section in the next couple of years. As you are aware, the major issue regarding the development of this property is how the storm water runoff would be handled. This was noted at the Commission, however they dealt with this item as a land use question only, the details of infrastructure could be worked out at a later date. There were changes to the conditions: Condition #4 was amended to an opaque fence or compact hedge to be provided along the west property line. Fences taller than 6' will require a Special Permit from the City Council. Condition #11 was added stating, 'The developer shall protect the sanitary force main along the south property line". Condition #12-The driveway shall have a concrete apron. If you would like additional information on this item, please advise. /fit.._ Ci Planner JS/js CC: Tom Hedges, City Administrator Mike Ridley, Project Planner C)" ° Agenda Information Memo May 7, 1991 City Council Meeting VARIANCE/UNITED MORTGAGE CORPORATION/WESCOTT ROAD SETBACK I. Variance, United Mortgage Corporation, of 15' to the Required 50' Setback Off of Wescott Road, Lot 25, Block 1 and Lot 1,Block 4, Hills of Stonebridge--An application has been received by the City of United Mortgage for a variance of 15' to the 50' setback from Wescott Road for two lots at the intersection of Wescott and Chatham Roads. The variance is requested because of the shape and size of the buildable area available to the lots due to the Wescott Road setback. For additional information in this regard, please refer to the Community Development Department staff report which is enclosed on pageshrough for your review. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny a variance for United Mortgage Corporation of 15' to the required 50' setback from Wescott Road as presented. SUBJECT: VARIANCE APPLICANT: UNITED MORTGAGE CORPORATION LOCATION: LOT 25, BLOCK 1, HILLS OF STONEBRIDGE ADDITION EXISTING ZONING: PD, R-1 (PLANNED DEVELOPMENT - SINGLE FAMILY) DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: MAY 7, 1991 DATE OF REPORT: APRIL 30, 1991 COMPILED BY: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT APPLICATION SUMMARY: An application has been submitted requesting Variances of 15' for both Lot 25, Block 1, and Lot 1, Block 4, Hills of Stonebridge. COMMENTS: Both lots are corner lots fronting on Chatham and Wescott Roads. Chatham Road has a 30' setback from the public right-of-way and Wescott Road has a 50' setback from the public right-of-way. The applicant believes the 50' setback is excessive and could be reduced without any detrimental affects to the homes on both lots. Lot 1, Block 4,would have only 36' to build on and Lot 25, Block 1 would have 49' at the front and only 30' at the rear of the lot to construct a home. With these restrictive dimensions, houses of appropriate design or of the neighborhood standards could not be built. If approved, these Variances shall be subject to the following conditions: 1. Driveway access shall be from Chatham Road. 2. All other Code requirements shall be met. UMC Variance . g W • 11..1.4 SE e W. LA GI. ; , .•..4 a 1 Rt�N ��NDERING ICAI• . g7 - .rte.-' •`PJ Street Map +•fi+ �°gyp° tIR o. MLL ' - E NTR1'Pi{ a -:,... . , frit-.,,.. /, ci 0 f t• 71T RL v -• •G� •M . • �, r2 �frptrRCLC 0/ AlikK \ 3f F Z,F,Y' CIF\ / 1[ 1 -. i i , •' ,, IN p t I)?:- *LSI 'UB I ISNIN ,'''' �9 V � ' .)• it Ann I�,i °L _J.' W11rnui -.Mk —_� . Zoning Map = *gib, s• i�.,..� / 1E-.,7,4 4 .u? CI ti ''a\e RR .,, I ger,i_ 0 ---„:„..,.„.4,, .. ,,,,/ p„. 414,"' .' 1 i‘'''• 01_ I JI ‘1,.. 1 1 - - .L .II R0. i - / its, D-I D-11 Comp Guide Plan Map ' ap, P • N D-II ---..._ .(...j ' I f . I 1. ,1D-1 : _ -..),_. I ' 1J P ,_ Jl1 r:'-'-' ■� 1 � Il � I . UMC Variances ' jG .:C 41O7:4 ie . rr ...cz i-r!On,( I ____1‘.... ..___11 a*/RE' .A ;f:'7-1 0c '— No/ f/ //me a/' the N '4 am 0be N.E.7/ -SKfnorl 24 • 374. 63 rn ti h .148 5 WESCOTT 21857 f;: ,. w:: :y :.: :: •;••••:• • :: — f : •:•:.s — r —i. �:::::::::::. .•.•....•...••. •.. :: :�#'::•:•:••::••�::.:.:::.;.:::.;.:.• �.r-- X20 -� 1 h ;. . ' J \ rl i ; 30 303 cv 22� #:'. � . _.:.:.:.: r ,\ \� IX (o O ^ $ r--l36 — 1 w I :tom' \ `& \ ew 1 I .16! on a X11 rn' N O 2 ti�+ D �\_°,. .\\Q. a,9„ \\�\a` �— �' • M 3dod'F_ _.\ t A3. \v-24 %\\..1. � \-- ,� ;p, r l l7 , y \ 0►, \\,' •e3, °15 06 18 3 o,g _ o \ - ) n= • ...... s \ ��' � . i?Z q, I r- _` — sggy„ \ '�Z \-V ��p `\p:34°.� WI P oa h , \�, 1 4 ; \z moo\ \7 '''I 1.,;.) , •��� `.�\\\ 1 �'�• O 55 •� o\\\o, \\ ,i. i �. 5 v ,%9 ,\ \\� 3 ,> < • �� s 4. > s% i p,,,•\ \' 5 \ \ i' '^ \ '*,�� 5' .� �� / �� r •ti~ .S\\:r. \\ '-4 \\\tr. CAP' ∎G. M C ti •d\ \ �` O�\\ D �' ,� ,c,�. ^Spy . i • \ \ \ 5--- V \ b /�� \\\wo 6 d, � .l \ if 4 •/i �pO� -71,_\ p� \\VS,i�0p \\ a a�2 `\ v. \�\ 2/.64 \I 30 .XI �_ 7 �\\� i' '^\\41 �• \ 1/ . \.b \ \ .may/��+f3 ,\'f,./0 ,f\\3. \\\ 40 mss.?.. s s�\� ,� # a•i s di 8 \\\ + l Jt,11 :\ ` s� 8 \�i4 47x76 //'•prat v+ .�i \\\ ,, aP . ,- \ \ 4.37.56to- \�,' 4;;-67 c9.0 ** it 4( 2422 Enterprise Drive * PIONEER LAND SURVEYORS•CtVIL t etwereERS Mendota Heights,MN 55120 it eng neering.• LAND PLANNERS•LANBSC APE ARCH,TECTS 1 (612) 681.1914 Certificate of Survey for: THE RO T T L UND COMPANY 'a<> NORTH WESCoT T ROAD N 89' 5912s' E 140.6/ n . o i -r • i BUILDABLE AREA 1�� H I \114 i 1 . r E '0 • Oo D *4 — J col . 1 . 30 ;1 ' r 1i ?'>. INb)C. r ES ADDIL.—BuILtoeLE AREA • goo.o Denotes existrn4, f/Fvolion ROPUSEO NOusE Elf vATioNS ""'oo.o.)Denotes propod Elevation �— ---- -- -_____Denotes Drorina e {Mb ti Easement lowest Floor E/evalron = - - denotes Draino e Flow /arrows Top of"Block Elevcxfiori o Deno/es mar rn enf Cr'arole Slab Clevafion : 8earvnhs shown art) assumed LOT Zs, BLOCK t , WILLS OF STONEgRIOE DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA SUBJECT T) EASEMENTS Or RECORD I hereby certify that this survey, plan or report wes prepared by me or under my direct supervision end that I ern riuty flrgktered Lend Surveyor under the lows of the Stete of Minnesota. Dated this day of A.D. 19 . I Scale : j►�� : 40 ad _. - --- - -- - �C nnnrnt n rc .cttrttt c rtTr, ti() tetl'tt t NI ** *4 2422 Enterprise Drive * PIONEER LAND SURVEYORS•CIVIL ENGINEERS Mendota Ileights,MN 55120 * engineering.. LAND PLANNERS•LAND'SC APE ARCHItrCT% -- (612) 681.1914 Certificate of Survey for:, THE RO T T L UND COMPANY WESCoTT RaAP NOQTI-I 14/ B9' 59 '15"E I 135.00 0 a 0 0.— oe - - - - 'o — — — — — — — Rio M tu 3 I h t� _e rf' 80 Z o ° _ z I -- - — I- BUILDABLE AREA I in M Q to rn 41 t4 6 S 5L 136.35 3a•. N es. 3e,r o0 E ::': ::::::INDICATES IDb'L $UIL,tABLE 4054 t•: r 900.0 Denotes existinit Elevation PROPOSED NoUSE ELEVATIONS ($00.0 Denotes prop d Ehvot%on Denotes brnrno Will a � ilrf Easement lowest floor Elevation = - Y Denotes Drain° e Flow Arrows Top ot'8lock Elevatiorn o Denotes monument Gorak Slob Geve on : _ 8 earls shown art assumed LOT 1 , BLOCK 4 , PILLS OF STOWESRIOQE DAKOT4 COUNTY, M1NNE$OTA SUBJECT TO EASEMENTS or Rrcor her ehy Certify that this survey elan or report was Dreoru d by me or under my direct et n rvisir and that I am duty aegis',red Land Surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota Dated this day of A.D. 19 . n Scale : 1 i)efl . �At'l/aft ;g(01 tir lAf"Ir I fl �irK rrll 1_c rte(: tlr1. IflRo1 Agenda Information Memo May 7, 1991 City Council Meeting ADDITIONAL ITEMS COIN. 91-04, APPROVE PLANS/AUTHORIZE AD OAKS OF BRIDGEWATER 2ND A. Contract 91-04, Approve Plans/Authorize Advertisement for Bids (Oaks of Bridgewater 2nd Addition)--With the petition submitted by the developer requesting the preparation of a feasibility report, it was also requested that the City proceed with the simultaneous preparation of detailed plans and specifications to facilitate the timeframe associated with the public improvement. If Project 610 is approved as a result of the public hearing earlier on the agenda, it would be appropriate for the Council to approve the detailed plans and authorize staff to solicit formal bids for this improvement under Contract 91-04. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve/continue the plans for Contract 91-04 (Oaks of Bridgewater 2nd Addition-Streets and Utilities) and, if approved, authorize the advertisement for bid opening to be held at 11:30 a.m., Friday, May 31, 1991. REOUEST FOR WAIVER OF WARRANTY MAINTENANCE BOND REQUIREMENT B. Request for Waiver of Warranty Mainten ce Bond Requirement (Cray Addition, Project 87-X and 89-E)-- Enclosed on page�3is a copy of the letter from Cray Addition requesting the City to waive the Code requirements of a one year warranty maintenance bond. Enclosed on page .2. is a copy of City Code 13.30, Subdivision 15, Section C, par. 2 (f) which requires the"developer to submit a one year warranty maintenance bond to be effect one full year from the date of final written acceptance by the City of the privately installed public utilities. With the development's final compliance with all requirements associated with the private installation of these public facilities, the City Council formally accepted these improvements for perpetual City maintenance on January 3, 1991. In lieu of the warranty bond being submitted as a condition of this final acceptance, the City has held the remaining reduced financial security originally submitted with the final plat for this development. The developer is now requesting the release of all remaining financial securities. The staff has requested the submission of a warranty bond as a condition of releasing the remaining financial security. Subsequently, the developer is requesting a waiver to the warranty maintenance bond requirement. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve/deny the request for waiver to City Code 13.30, Subdivision 15, Section C, par. 2 (f) as it pertains to the Cray 1st and 2nd Addition (Project 87-X and 89-E). (72 R�0r^jar• 7`�>> Cray Research Park,655 Lone Oak Drive, Eagan MN 55121 • (612)452-6650 April 25, 1991 • Mr. Thomas Colbert City Engineer City of Eagan . . 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55123 Re: Warranty Bond for Public Utility Work Dear Tom, In the Development Contract that Cray Research has with the City of Eagan, the requirement for a warranty bond for public utility work is not stated nor implied. The work in question was completed in 1987 and was regularly inspected by the City Public Works Department during the construction stage. Even though written acceptance of the work by the City did not occur for more than three years after completion of the work, Cray Research will abide by Paragraph 13 in the Development Contract. • Please request approval by the City Council for a variance on the warranty bond. Thank you. S cereiy, l ' Eric C. Lindahl Director, Corporate Real Estate ECL/slb (f) Upon completion, inspection and final acceptance of the affected streets and/or utili- ties to be reverted to the City for future maintenance, the developer shall submit a 1-year warranty maintenance bond to cover defects in materials and workmanship to be in effect one full year from the date of final written acceptance by the City. The developer shall also submit a hold harmless, lien waiver, or other agreement as required by the City. If the City was not properly noticed or given the opportunity to perform the proper inspections to insure compliance with the approved plans and specifications, the City, at its option, may elect to require the submission of up to a five- year warranty maintenance bond or cash escrow for any por- tion of the system where inspection was not able to be performed. Failure to comply with these requirements on behalf of the developer will allow the City the right to deny access or connection to these streets and/or utilities. (g) The developer/applicant shall provide the City with a financial guarantee in an acceptable form and an amount equal to 60% of the estimated cost of the improvements to be performed privately by the developer/applicant. D. Street Lighting. Street lights shall be installed as provided by the City Code. (CODIFIER'S NOTE: The policy, standards and procedures for installing and billing street lighting are provided for in Chapter 3 of the City Code.) E. Trees. "Street" trees shall be planted as provided in Subdivision 11 of this Section. F. Driveway Approaches. Concrete or bitumi- nous driveway surfaces over each boulevard on lots adjacent to streets improved to City standards shall be provided in accordance with the provisions of the issuance of building permits. G. Payment for Public Improvements. Before a final plat is approved by the Council, the applicant shall submit an agreement and performance bond, irrevocable letter of credit or cash escrow agreement in such reasonable amount as determined by the Council to assure the following: 1. Guaranteed completion of the required improvements undertaken by the applicant as approved by the City within a specified time after commence- ment of any construction in the subdivision, or such portion thereof less than the entire subdivision to be developed at any one time as approved by the Council; provided, that the Council for good cause, may extend the period of time in which the improvements must be installed. • (1-1-83) 404 Agenda Information Memo May 7, 1991 City Council Meeting REVIEW DAKOTA ELECTRIC ASSOCIATION FEE REQUEST C. Review Dakota Electric Association Fee Request for Utility Permit Issuance (Woodlands North and Elrene Road)--With the recent development approvals of the Wescott Square and Woodlands North Additions west of Elrene Road on either side of Trails End Road (formerly Kost Road), various public improvements are being installed which include upgrading the affected public streets. (See map enclosed on page0,32.). Presently, Dakota Electric Association has an overhead electrical distribution system along the west side of Elrene Road along Yankee Doodle Road to the south as well as on the south side of Kost Road, all of which are adjacent to the previously referenced subdivisions With the upgrading of these roadways and the development of these subdivisions, staff has requested Dakota Electric to replace these existing overhead electrical lines with an underground system comparable to and compatible with the system being installed within the two adjacent developments. However, DEA has expressed reluctance to do so due to the additional cost. In applying for the permit from the City enclosed on page�33, they are requiring the City of Eagan to reimburse them $9,689.00 to bury this facility. Without the City committing to this fee, Dakota Electric has told the developers that they cannot obtain a permit from the City to provide the electrical service necessary for these developments. Subsequently, the staff has worked with the developers whereby they have temporarily agreed to guarantee the costs through an agreement which would allow the City to assess these costs against property owned by Robert Engstrom. However, the developer has requested the City to pursue this issue with DEA to get this cost removed so that the permits can be issued. Enclosed on page (2,3 is a copy of City Code Section 11.10, Subdivision 8, under Land Use Regulations whi h addresses public utility service. Also enclosed on page 23 is a portion of the code under subdivision regulations Section 13.30, Subdivision 14 which pertain to underground utilities. This issue is being presented to the City Council due to the fact that the City staff has never received a demand for payment from the City of Eagan for the issuance of a permit requiring the installation of underground utilities. It would be helpful if the Council could review the situation and provide direction to the City staff regarding the following issues: 1. Should this system be placed underground or remain overhead? 2. Should the costs associated with the conversion of the existing system to underground be considered part of the public improvements being installed under Project 589R (Elrene Road and Trails End Road Upgrade) and assessed to all properties benefitting from this roadway improvement? V � 3 Agenda Information Memo May 7, 1991 City Council Meeting 3. Should Dakota Electric be required to bury the existing overhead facility at no cost to the City in consideration of using public right-of-way for their distribution system? 4. Should the developer of the Woodlands North Addition be required to finance this additional fee required by DEA? ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To review Dakota Electric Association's request for reimbursement for utility permit issuance (Woodlands North and Elrene Road) and provide direction to City staff as appropriate. • • go ,O , /r e•, y�• C wa �I• u:G .•,,' u' `Y'-iii-_ fiq �NI• -11 r + `— - 4 1 53��I I` u ie ..i.„,._ • ',3 LI 1 A I• 6 I:'1 •o m > o • a Nib- Ia ° p 0 z to! •, I.° I. > 16, \ ,, ;,- •, _ aaao TRAL 5 E 0 3508 • • • J n. " - , . 4. .w N ROAD •^ - -I • a m ----0 Cn iI I I I I I ^$ l • ::ul� le I.� I: ,• a N 1 c Ii • — . - _ r _ - i a _ _ • — , — 1 1 12,--•,i--P-:.' t;' I•rN 11 ��O •: MIKE COLLINS I RIVE ° I VVVVV � � � / a --- \ 1 � it .—: rt: I I.- , q.,,ton 0 * --:-;1C .1 ■\ , C 11 —J ' -- ` H Z. < —I— — 1---�I--1 ` oLP .� S I \ ‘•/__.....- x • Y \o a T- - o- d o L• ei a. _-V/\ - \ '1 ' I I� r / / / / / : CO C 1 • O • [CREME •+ ROI,O '•' • to • CD N 4 V tel O 0 O 0 i 1 1� z � Ijm DAKOTA ELECTRIC ASSOCIATION f x F 4° t z FARMINGTON, MINNESOTA i r €� • REA PROJECT MINNESOTA 65 DAKOTA 3 a........ II 1 I APPLICATION FOR PERMIT FOR INSTALLATION OF UTILITIES peerrnh No. NAME OF APPLICANT r Accnr4p*4nn phone 4E2-71:4 • F'arrincton Minnesota 55024 • CRT SIAM s» NAME OF PARTY OR ORGANIZATION PERFORMING WORK same ADDRESS : Phone VT, ftaTE y► *1. Nature of Work place uncerground electric cable al.ona Rost Road as requested by City (see note below) . Work to be cooridinated with Woodlands North Acid]Type of Surface to be Disturbed (check type) X Concrete Bituminous Gravel Dirt 2 Location as shown on the attached print R-256 • 3.A construction sketch or plan shall show the location of the proposed utility.A copy of the sketch or plan shall be provided with permit application. 4. Method of Installation or Construction Backhoe 5. Work to start on or atter 1991 and shall be completed by approx. 1991 DATE DATE E. Will detouring of traffic be necessary? No . If necessary to detour traffic describe suggested route: • • DETOURS: The appropriate jusrisdictional highway department shall be notified in writing at least 72 hours in advance of any detour being established, changed or discontinued. At least two 7" flashing amber lights shall be mounted on end barricades, plus one advance warninc sich.This is the minimum number only!if more flasher units are needed to protect traffic. they shall be furnished by applicant. _ 7. Surface must be restored within 48 hours of completion of backfill. Except forthe negligent acts of the City, its agents and its employees,the Utility or Permittee shall assume all liability for, and save the City, its agents and its employees, harmless from any and all claims for damages, actions or causes of action arising out of the work to be done herein and the continuing uses by the Permit-tee, includin_ but not limited to the placing, constructing,reconstructing,maintaining and using of said utility under this application and permit for construction. The undersigned herewith accepts the terms and conditions of the regulations by athe City of Eagan as herein Contained and agree to fully comply therewith to the satisfaction of the City Council of Eagan. For Ed S.H ebenaler Title: Supervisor of Mapping Services Signe.C: - 'c% Date: 3'-13-91 • AUTHORIZATION OF PERMIT In consideration of agreement to comply in all respects with the regulations of the City of Eagan covering such operations, and pursuant to authorization duly given by said Eagan City Council;permission is here- by cranted for the work to be done as described in the above application, said work to be done in accordance with special provisions as hereby stated: APPROVED BY: DEPT. OF PUBLIC WORKS BY: DATE: AU.LEGAL REDUIREMENTS SHOWN ON REVERSE SIDE AND ON"SPECIAL PROVISIONS"TO BE COMPLIED WtTH!THE DATE WREN WORK IS COMPLETED MUST BE REPORTED TO THE EAGAN CITY ENGINEER. Ncte : This permit is submitted per your request for underground electric service according to Chapter 13 of City code. Dakota Electric feels that the most reliable economical service would be achieved by rebuilding the existing overhead system. Should the City require underground as described in the permit, there will be a cost differential charge of $9,689.00 to be paid by the City of Eagan. -3 3 D. The Council may waive the required side yard setback requirement in all districts, if two legal lots of record are held in one ownership and are combined by the Dakota County Assessor as one tax parcel. Subd. 7. Traffic Visibility. On all corner lots in all districts, no structure or planting in excess of thirty (30) inches above the abutting curb line shall be permitted within a triangular area defined as follows: Beginning at the intersection of the projected curb lines of two intersecting streets, thence thirty (30) feet along one curb diagonally to a point thirty (30) feet from the point of beginning of the other curb line, thence to the point of beginning. Subd. 8. Public Utility Service. It is unlawful to install, construct, erect, alter, revise, reconstruct or move any pipeline, underground telephone line, underground electric transmission line and overhead electric transmis- sion line including structures related thereto, without first obtaining the approval from the Council. In issuing said approval, the Council shall find that: A. The proposed location of the essential service shall not unreasonably interfere with future land use of the City. B. The depth of any buried essential ser- vices shall be at a depth that will not cause future problems with roads, streets, utilities or buildings. C. The width of any linear easements or rights-of-way shall not be such that it will unreasonably interfere with future land use. Subd. 9. Structures in Public Rights-of-Way. No buildings, structures or uses may be located in or on any public lands or rights-of-way without approval by the Council. Subd. 10. Land Reclamation and Mining. Land reclamation and mining shall be permitted in all districts by conditional use permit and otherwise licensed or regu- lated by other City Code provisions. A. The conditional use permit shall include as a condition thereof, an approved finish grade plan which will not adversely affect the adjacent land. B. An approved program for regulating the type of fill permitted, for control of rodents, fire, vehi- cular ingress and egress, hours of operation, unstable slopes, material dispersed from wind or hauling of material to or from the site and general maintenance of the site. (1-1-83) 276 C;Z :5L/' S 13.30 Subd. 12. Solar Access. The City requests that the developer consider all potential solar energy conservation measures when planning a subdivision. A City Handbook, outlining the design criteria for solar access, is available at City Hall. Subd. 13. Environmental Protection. The City will enforce environmental protection and erosion control in the development of subdivisions within the City. This includes off development sites as well as wetlands areas. A Handbook on Environmental Protection is available at City Hall. Subd. 14 . Underground Utilities. A. All utilities including transmission service lines shall be required to be placed underground unless economic, technological or land characteristic factors make underground placement unfeasible as determined by the Council. B. Routing of utilities shall avoid unstable soils, bluffline or high ridges and the alteration of the natural environment for above ground or underground utilities shall be minimized to the maximum extent possible . Subd. 15. Required Improvements. The following required improvements shall be installed in accordance with the engineering policy, standards and specifications adopted by the City: A. Monuments. Monuments shall be placed at all block and lot corners, angle points, points of curves in streets and at intermediate points as shall be required by the City. The monuments shall be of such material, size and length as may be approved by the City. It shall be the applicant's responsibility to see that the monuments are maintained in good order during construction and development. B . Utility Improvements. 1. Sanitary Sewer System. (a) Where available, municipal sewer facilities shall be provided in the development of the subdivision. (b ) Where municipal sewer facilities are not available, individual sewage systems shall be provided in accordance with the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency Standards and as approved by the City. 2. Water Systems. (a) Where available, municipal water facilities shall be provided in the development of the subdivision. 402 (1-1-83) MINUTES OF.:A SPECIAL MEETING OF THE :EACAN_CITY::I*OINCi L AprII 23, 1991 A special meeting of the Eagan City Council was held on Tuesday, April 23, 1991 at 6:30 p.m. at John Metcalf Junior High School. Present were Mayor Egan and City Councilmembers Gustafson, Pawlenty and Wachter. City Councilmember McCrea was absent for the Board of Equalization meeting, however,was present at the Fire Administration building for the Blackhawk Park Development discussion. Also present was City Administrator Hedges. Tha::purpose of the meeting was to convene the annual Board of Equalization on behalf of Dakc3ta County;::i BOARD'-OF EQUALIZATION MEETING Mayor Egan called the annual rriceting::ofitttel8oiirti:4:Equalization to order and informed those present of the City Council's responsibility during a Board of Equalization meeting which is to convene the meeting on behalf of Dakota County and further that the City Council,following the formal presentation by the Dakota County Assessor's office will leave the school and reconvene a special City Council meeting to review plans for the proposed Blackhawk Park project. Mr. Bill Peterson, representing the Dakota:::CouVAssessor's office, provided instructional comments relative to how residents in attendance:can;xeview their tax statements, specifically market value adjustments, and further handle:gei<ierah.questions pertaining to property tax valuations. Mr. Peterson informed the City Council that the.total:net tax:Capacity for 1990 was$59,845,000 and the new total for 1991 is$62,688,095. Mr. Peterson n'fu ter:reportad.the percentage increase to be 4.63 percent. Mayor Egan and City Councilmembers Gustafson,/Rawlenty and Wachter signed the Dakota County property tax assessment record for all Eagan properties. Preserit were approximately fifteen (15)property appraisers from Dakota County who met with various property owners on a one-to-one basis located around the gymnasium in John Metcalf school. It should be noted that the annual Board of Equalization meeting was formally adjourned at approximately p.m. BLACKHAWK:.PARK DEVELOPMENT Mayor Egan reconvened the special:City Council:meeting at the Fire Administration building for the purpose of reviewing the Blackhawk Park:Plans with:Stiff from the Parks&Recreation Department. Those staff persons in attendance in addition::to the entire City Council and City Administrator were John VonDeLinde,Superintendent of Parks,Steve Su[ivan.Park Planner, Dorothy Peterson, Superintendent of Recreation, and Ken Vraa, Director of Parks:& iecreat* Pirnctor of Parks & Recreation Vraa provided comments and exhibits pertaining to the.hiistory of why'glackhawk Park was acquired and proposed as a community park and further modifications the plans have received as a result of review by the Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Advisory Commission and input by various neighborhood groups. City Councilmembers provided information and recommendations based on their study of the issue and input having attended neighborhood meetings hosted::b ::residents on the east side of the park, residing on Murphy Parkway, and the west side of BIaokflawV Parkin.the Riverton Drive area After a lengthy discussion on the proposed improvements Staff was given;specific direction to prepare a presentation that includes information on the original grant and planning process and the changes that were made by the Parks& Recreation staff as a result of:public input to be presented at the May 7 City Council meeting. It was also suggested that staff prepare; a fact .sheet..as.: : handout for that meeting. Following approximately 11/2 hours of presentation':and::discussion;::Mayor Egan commended the City staff for their work on the proposed Blackhawk Park While i lsiiCing....setisftivity for the neighborhood and integrity of a community park. Page 2/EAGAN SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL: April 23, 1991 .......... • There were no additional business:items and the meeting was adjourned at approximately 9:15 p.m. TLH ..•.•.• ..•.•.• •.• .• Date ' ......• City Clerk •••••••- •••••• ..• . ......•••.••.•.•.• • :: •.• • • •••:•::: • •::: .•.• .• •••••••• • •••••••••••••••••••••• • • • • . •••••• •.•• . . .•.•.•... .•.•.•. ••• ........... MINUTES OF A SPECIAL MEETING OF THE :::: AGAN CITY COUNCIL Eagan, Minnesota A special meeting of the Eagari;City Council was held on Tuesday, April 9, 1991 at 5:30 p.m. in the City Council Chambers of the Mi;iiiicipal Center building. Present were Mayor Egan and City Councilmembers Gustafson, McCrea, Pawlenty and Wachter. City Councilmember Gustafson arrived at approximately 6:00 p.m. Also present were Director of Public Works Colbert, Director of Finance VanOverbeke, Administrative Assistant Witt and City Administrator Hedges. MnDOT VIDEOTAPE/ROAD OMITS,AND RECONSTRUCTION OVERLAYS Director of Public Works Colt s* inforrni.i0i the City Council that a video was prepared by the Minnesota Department of Transportaticin;:narrated: .y Mike Fairbome of WCCO,Channel 4,that describes basic factors involved in local street constro.C4iort•and.the.adverse effect that weather and excessive loads have on the expected life of a street.:>i e:fuith t to that the benefits associated with preventative structural overlays are similar to the City's proposal for Project.608 that will overlay streets that are located in Eagandale Center Industrial Park 3. The video, approximately 16 minutes in length, was presented to the City Council. RIGHT OF ENTRY/WENZEL PROPERTY Director of Public Works Colbert requested:o S deration by the City Council to proceed with the right-of-entry for the Larry Wenzel property.to::aflow tTie:installation of storm sewer for the Effress Addition. After a brief explanation and in a':,motion by CiW: Councilmember Wachter, seconded by City Councilmember McCrea,with all members: ioting.in.favor, authorization was given for right-of-entry to the Larry Wenzel property to install storm sewer.under Project:567R for the Effress Addition. FIVE YEAR C.I.P. STREET RECONSTRUCTION PROGRAM Director of Public Works Colbert presented the five (5)year C.I.P. street reconstruction program, stating that project identified in 1991 are segments of Wilderness Run Road, Eagandale Center Industrial Park 3rd and 4th Additions and Meadowview Road. He further reviewed the ranking and proposed street reconstruction for calendar 1992-1995, stati4.filat planrilfx9:and programming aspects associated with these proposed improvements are essential to:..a::successful street reconstruction program. City Councilmembers agreed with the recommendations:to plan and program the five (5) year C.I.P. with a specific study beginning in the summer of 1991 for improvements proposed for 1992. City Councilmembers further emphasized the important ei of ongoing information to neighborhoods as a result of informational public hearings. The Directof:of Publip:Works stated that any cost of advanced studies and the financing of the proposed capital:iiiipr64tiiei:its:a4identified in the five (5) year C.I.P. He also addressed the concept of holding a public hearing for the improvement and a special assessment hearing at the same meeting. City Councilmembers agreed with that format and provided direction to the Director of Public Works to proceed with the five year C.I.P street reconstruction program, planning and programming as presented. BID AWARD/REFUNDINe BONDS'*FOR G O. IMPROVEMENTS AND G O :PARK & RECRE*TION City Administrator Hedges stati #;that bids were officaIly opened at 10:30 a.m. on Tuesday,April 9 to consider refunding of general obligatf0 3:impr v!ementbonds referenced as Series 1991A and general obligation park & recreation bonds now itiefei'et ced:as:i'efi ruaisig bonds Series 1991 B. He stated that the reason for considering the refunding issue was to lower the interest rate on the outstanding principal of Page 2/EAGAN SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MINUTES g April 9, 1991 both bond issues, netting a savings over.the.remaining ffaC..each outstanding bond. Dave MacGillivray, the City's fiscal consultant representin. S cin s ed:Put lie::Financial Advisors, and Director of Finance VanOverbeke were present to discuss'and'presetit thebIds:•Mr. MacGillivray reported that his evaluation of the bids indicate an interest savings bt both refunding bond issues and recommended the City Council consider resolutions awarding the successful bids for both Series 1991A and Series 1991B bonds as stated. Mr. MacGillivray reviewed each of the refunding bond issues, commenting on the number of bidders,the City's rating, net interest cost and rate and other information in response to questions by the City Council. After further review by the City Council and in a motion by City Councilmember Wachter, • seconded by City Councilmember Pawlenty, with all members voting in favor, the general obligation improvement refunding bonds Seriesa991A in the actual amount of$3,290,000, with a net interest rate of 6.0878 percent was awarded to DaikBoswortt :Inc., the successful and low bidder. In a motion by City Councilmember Pawieoty, seconded by City Councilmember Wachter, with all members voting in favor, general obligation:. ;•rk..B.:Fecreation refunding bonds Series 1991 B were authorized in an actual amount of$2,440,000.a::a:nef.:it terest rate of 6.1692 percent to Dain Bosworth, Inc., the successful and low bidder. PROJECT 546/FINAL ASSESSMENT HEARING FOR CEDARVALE BOULEVARD • Director of Public Works Colbert reviewed the proposed final assessment hearing for the overlay, restriping and limited curb and gutter drainage improvements for Cedarvale Boulevard from Nicols Road to Silver Bell Road referenced as Project 546::and::schedured for the May 7, 1991 City Council meeting. He stated that in preparing the final assessment•-roli concerns have been expressed by representatives of the Cedarvale Shopping Center andSincleir gas station regarding the amount and method of allocating the special assessments associated with:i is:project.. Director of Public Works Colbert also expressed a sensitivity on behalf of his staff for working with:represenhtatives of the Cedarvale business district and attempting to identify the issues and alternatives avaifable:tn:assist in their economic development and, as a result, wanted an opportunity to review special assessment concerns and alternatives with the City Council to determine how best to propose and present the final assessments associated with Project 546. - He stated that assessments are not being levied against existing businesses on the north side of Cedarview Drive frontage road, however, the Sinclair gas station and other properties on the south side of Cedarvale Boulevard, including Cedarvale Shopping Center, will be assessed. After reviewing the project, the method of assessment and determining that::$7:1,512.73 is the revenue source proposed for the levying of special assessments with:;a:total prgtect cost of$425,132.70, the assessment method as proposed by the Director of Public *Om is acceptable. The City Council further advised that an informational meeting be held prior to the.May 7 public hearing to discuss the proposed assessments with those parcels receiving a notice of special assessment from the City. There were also legal questions raised about the closing of private streets::adjace t:ti the:Center by the City Council which resulted in a discussion of various options to redevelop tte.eritireCedaniafe area Mayor Egan acknowledged that no formal action is required on the proposed special assessments for Project 546, however, did emphasize the importance of holding a special informational meeting with those properties that will be assessed prior to the May 7 meeting. PROJECT 589RJELr4ENE ROAD IMPROVEMENTS Director of Public Works Colberibresented Project:589R,the reconstruction of Elrene and Trails End Road, requesting further consideration by the City Council on design, financing and assessment alternatives. He stated that various conditions of the final plat:approval of West Publishing Company 4th Addition requires dedication of utility drainage.:and:pondiitg easements. The Director of Public Works further indicated that easements entaileGl:tte: #icaticu :ofa:siz foot trailway easement along the east side of Elrene Road to allow,a trailway to be constructed approximately 18 feet from the street curb section Page 3/EAGAN SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MINUTES April 9, 1991 to accommodate a potential urban laryiscape.:,planning..program by the City in the future. He further commented that the vision of an 18 foot:Wlt :tx?ula 401.for:.the trail is considered as Option A and a constructed trail and existing right-of-way:tptovidiitig fora•13 foot wide boulevard is considered Option B. City Councilmembers discussed the ttlit alignment and agreed to minimize the amount of easement . • acquisition from West Publishing and,ttefore,gave direction to the Director of Public Works that design of the trailway is appropriate as a 13 foot width instead of 18 feet as shown. There were two assessment options reviewed and after discussion by the City Council, it was agreed that the total project cost of $484,860 should be assessed according to Option A that includes the residential property and the west side of West Publishing Company as the benefited property. There were three(3)options for considering storm sewer improvements ranging from acquisition of ponding easements and development of two ponds, including JP-33.1 and 33.2, 00uisitiori.::old development of Pond JP-33.1 only and a final consideration to provide no ponding Girt.West Publishing. Following a presentation by the Director of Public Works and deliberation by the:City Council; there was concurrence that the City acquire pond easement and develop Pond JP-33.1 pnly;::referenced.as:Aption B in the consulting engineering report prepared by BRA. After further review and comments of the proposed Elrene Road improvement project,Mayor Egan directed Director of Public Works Colbert to prepare a presentation for the public hearing scheduled for May 7, based on the options discussed and presented to the City Council. • CIGARETTE VENDINGMACIHINE LICENSING • City Administrator Hedges stated.that:the City::.Clerk's office was directed by the City Council to review and provide information relativeto the licensing:and additional regulatory controls for cigarette vending machines. Liz Witt, Administrative:?assistant,. appeared and reviewed information that was compiled by her office containing information.kirri:Minriesota communities with ordinances to restrict cigarette machines and also regulatory options open.toi:cOrnmunities who wish to control children's • access to tabacco. She also represented data that was compiled by ANSR (Association of Non-Smokers Minnesota) that ranges from total ban, partial ban to a partial ban with locking devises for the regulation of cigarette vending machines. Also present were Cheryl Casey and Mary Jane Swenson, concerned citizens, who expressed their support for regulatory language that would ban the placement of cigarette vending machines. City Councilmember Pawienty stated that he was supportive of a ban on cigarette machines and would support regulation::fore i g:the::sale f:tabacco behind or over the counter in all establishments throughout the City. CO::Couric4member McCrea stated she was concerned about the impact on small business if a ban is:approved tor:cigarette vending machines. City Councilmember Gustafson stated that the problem is the..use of cigarettes, not the sale through vending machines. After further discussion on the item, Mayor.::Egan moved, City Councilmember Pawlenty seconded, with all members voting in favor, that an ordinance::to consider:.a:ban on vending machine sales of tobacco related items be directed to the May 7 Citji.Coiinciiirieetirigfor further consideration. Mayor Egan asked Administrative Assistant Witt to inform those business establishments that have vending machines so they are aware of the May 7 City Council meeting. CELLULAR TOWER.:REGULATIONS City Administrator Hedges stated:tftet'City staff was:directed by the City Council to review the City code with Cellular One to determine wl attegulatory langt e, if any, is desirable for the City to avoid transmission poles occurring in agricultural districts at random throughout the community. Director of Community Development Runkle appeared and stated that;having reviewed the state of technology with Cellular One, specifications for future tower Installations will:ndicate a significant height reduction and further, that few installations will be n oaas5ei: :iii::tile:.Col Uliunity to meet the need for mobile phone transmission. Mr. Warren Dunlap, of Cellular One, appeared and further discussed technology as it Page 4/EAGAN SPECIAL CfTY COUNCIL MINUTES f' April 9, 1991 • relates to the siting and construction gI.poles..to accpmmodate the transmission of telephone signals for mobile car phones. After presentations:a*ii ussioit:ly staff and representatives of Cellular One City Councilmembers determined that there'is'no need to further discuss a City code language change for the regulation of cellular towers in agriaikural zoning districts. EVEN YEAR MUNICIPAL ELECTIONS City Administrator Hedges stated that with the assistance of Administrative Assistant Witt and Assistant to the City Administrator Hohenstein, information was compiled regarding the cost, benefit and merits of even year elections for consideration by..the City Council. City Councilmember McCrea stated that even year elections will provide ictst savings:to the City and further stated that the term for Mayor should be extended to four years frorii the preset:two years to provide a greater consistency in policy and direction for the City Council. Councilmembers:also discussed a division of the community into wards and precincts as an opportunity to provide:greeter:.pc:il icalrepresentation. After a discussion of the ward concept, it was determined and agreed::b::all;:City:Cauncilrtiembers that further consideration of wards and precincts is not beneficial to the City of Eagan given the number of issues that exist in a 34 square mile community, stating that the community is better represented by all its City Councilmembers being elected at large. Administrative Assistant Witt stated that the 1991 municipal election cannot be eliminated, an off-year election; however, there are options for consideration that would include a variety of staggered terms to begin a change over for the even year elections. City Councilmembers suggested that a public hearing be scheduled prior to the 19911tidtiicgpal election to allow public input regarding the options for even year elections. ...OTHER BUSINESS There being no further business, the meeting:was::adjourned at approximately 9:45 p.m. TLH Date City Clerk MINUTES OF A SPECIAL.MEETING OF THE EAGAN:CIT1.f.::GOUNCIL ..�:•:•:�:�gan �lilifiiinesiita April 2, 1991 A special meeting of the Eagan City Council was held in Conference Rooms A and B of the Eagan Municipal Center Building on Tuesday, April 2, 1991 at 4:00 p.m. Present were Mayor Egan, Councilmembers Gustafson, McCrea, 1'dvvlenty and Wachter. Also present were Director of Community Development Runkle, Recycling Coordinator Hagerman,Assistant to the City Administrator Hohenstein and City Administrator Hedges. The purpose:of the meeting is to receive the presentation and information by Dakota County officials on the propose l::resourc a recovery facility. Dakota County Commissioner Chapdelaine provided some introductory comments to the City Council, staff and citizens who were in attendance to rev'ie■v the proposed resource recover facility that will use incineration to process refuse. Barry Schade, project manager for the resource recovery facility project, made a lengthy presentation about the data,environmental impact statement and numerous special studies that were conducted by Dakota County that led to a choice of proceeding with a method of incinera- tion instead of composting refuse. His presentation included a distribution of material that is support documentation for the multi-million dollar study that was:completed by Resource Integration Systems and Franklin Associates, consultants for Dakota County:::::Jeff:'Connell, Director of Physical Development, also presented information relative to the propic sed::Dakota County Resource Recovery Facility pertaining to recycling and composting programs. City.touncilmerjbers asked a variety of questions pertinent to the proposed incinerator that were responded:t4:by.::Countystaff. Mayor Egan recognized other County'ofeiats:induding the Dakota County Administrator Lyle Wray, Lou Breimhurst, Director of Physical Development,as well as other Dakota County staff members and thanked Commissioner Chapdelaine, Mr. Schade and Mr. Connell for the excellent presentations and information distributed to the City Council regarding the County's proposal to build the resource recovery facility. Mayor Egan informed the Dakota County officials and audience that a resolution entitled"Proposed Dakota County Resource Recovery Facility will be formally considered by the City Council as an action item on the regular City Council agenda later that:evening,:::: .`? :OTHE( .BUSINESS There was no further business and:the meeting was adjourned at approximately 6:00 p.m. Mayor Egan again informed representative:of:tiV:County and:the citizens in attendance that this item would be considered as an official agenda item at alregular Gitj Cit<tincil meeting scheduled to begin at 6:30 p.m. TLH Date City Clerk MINUTESilt F A SPECIAL MEETING OF THE EAGAN.CITY.COUNCIL • March 12, 1991 A special meeting of the Eagan City Council was held on Tuesday, March 12, 1991 at 5:30 p.m. in the lunchroom of the Municipal Center building. Present were Mayor Egan, City Councilmembers Gustafson, McCrea, Pawlenty and Wachter. Also present were Director of Community Development Runkle, Director of Public Works/Engineering Colbert, Director of Parks & Recreation Vraa, Police Chief Geagan, Fire Chief Southom, Director:of Finance.yanOverbeke and City Administrator Hedges. DRAFT 1991/1990 CAPITAL,IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM City Administrator Hedges reviewed.:ftmding:source:options for those projects that are identified in the draft five-year capital improvements:program(1:991 X1:996). He briefly reviewed the proposed capital improvements program budget stating that each project is supported by a special study, such as the needs analysis that was recently completed for the Municipal Center Law Enforcement Building, Master Planning for fire stations and parkland development studies and many other improvements relating to the community's infrastructure. The City Administrator presented,for discussion purposes, the draft five (5) year CIP expenditures and funding sources by category,_.ipcluding: Category I) expenditures that are financed from funding sources including community.investme tt funds,GO bond referendum,general fund, equipment revolving, park site fund and grants:.ind;iategory II) projects that are financed from special assessments, major street construction;.: ser::fees.anti::franchise fees. He reported a grand total of the five (5) year CIP at $45,424,042, Whiófi represents expenditures proposed in the Category I at $21,874,993, while Category II is the difference:or:$23 549,049. Director of Finance VanOverbeke explained fundifi•restrictions by revenue source which include community investment fund, GO bond referendum, general fund, equipment revolving fund, park site acquisition and development fund,grants,special assessments,major street fund,user fees and franchise fees. City Administrator Hedges reviewed public policy issues that were related to the proposed CIP that require direction by the City Council. As an example, projects that were identified in Category I, for the most part, would either be financed through the community investment fund or a GO bond referendum. The total of these projects is$16,018,500:an assuming:availability in the community investment fund of approximately$4.8 million, a signiificant::GO:bond: eferendum would be necessary to fund all the projects. He further reviewed public policy deciOris which:.ffGlude the prioritization of certain capital needs,which capital programs should be financed by.the community investment fund and which should be financed by a bond referendum and a schedule:which ranges from beginning construction of the highest priority in 1991/1992 to a delay of the capital pt s;ic 993 tt rough 1995 or beyond this five (5) year CIP. Mayor Egan expressed his appreciation for a detailed explanation and information as prepared by the City Administrator as a result of the February 28, 1991 work session when City Council first reviewed the formal draft 1991-1995 capital improvements program. City Councilmember Gustafson stated a need for creating a balanced park systen.i:.which includes an ice arena and outdoor swimming pool in addition to the traditional parkland:,mproverne45:Viat include athletic fields, neighborhood parks and other open space. He expressed a need to re-pno iiize the overall parkland development in order to balance parkland facilities for the conmriiunity. City Couri .'iember McCrea suggested that an ice arena and outdoor swimming pool could be self-supporting for operational expenses and further suggested a creative review of all funding sources it. ii:consider financing:1 ie proposed ice arena/outdoor swimming pool. City Councilmember Pawlenty expressed::a:OdnOrri; ut the increase in property taxes and how the public might react if certain capital Sri Jets::sire::ai:itiidrizeil:that could generate more general fund tax burden due to operational expenses. Mayor Egan suggested that the City consider a lease back proposal I Page 2/EAGAN SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING March 12, 1991 • for Fire Station #6 as suggested by.._Opus..C•arporation..as.an alternative method of financing. City Councilmember Gustafson suggested: t:t :City:contact our school districts to review their schedule for bond referendums and explore the potential'fo'r'comb'ined City/school referendum as it relates to the City's capital projects that are identiFieafbr funding as a result of the GO bond referendum issue. Mayor Egan expanded on City Councilmembe:Gustafson's comments,stating that there is a similarity between City and school programming for Parks& Recreation which is reason for contacting the school districts to explore joint facilities. City Councilmember Gustafson further indicated a desire to explore a bond referendum as a method of financing the third community athletic complex. City Councilmember Pawlenty asked about the time table in financing the CIP. The City Administrator responded by indicating a desire to adopt 1991-1995 capital improvements program.by June of this calendar year. The City Administrator further indicated that each year the tjapital improvements program would be modified as part of the general operating budget for the next::year. Cv:Councilmember Wachter stated he is in support of formalizing a five (5) year capital improvements:program, however, with the legislative uncertainty of increased property taxes and decreasing.local:gOvernmerlt:aids, he has concerns about constructing an ice arena without voter approval. City:Coiuncitrrititber:Oisstafson also stated his support for the capital improvements budget as presented as a working document. Other City Councilmembers agreed that the capital improvements program, as presented, is an excellent working document and once staff has an opportunity to further modify the funding scenarios, it will be used as a guideline and be proposed for adoption during the summer of 1991. City Councilmembers further discussed the.pr bability of financing certain capital projects from the community investment fund as opposed.:to: sing.general obligation bonds which requires a bond referendum. There were a number of:advantages and.:disadvantages discussed. City Councilmember Wachter asked Chief:of:Police.Geagan to explain law enforcement needs which is a vital part of the proposed capital improvements::b dget. Chief Geagan stated that the existing building was designed and occupied with a ten (10)':y :expectation and the department is now experiencing its thirteen year in the building. He further indicated that most operational areas are extremely tight causing inefficiencies in day-to-day operations. City Councilmember McCrea asked if the expansion does not occur during 1991-1993,what are the implications for police services. Chief Geagan responded that each year the Police Department continues to expand its personnel and operations to correspond to an increasing residential population and expanding employment base. He stated that eventually the Police Department will suffer.as:S result:of:inefficiencies, lacking an adequate work space. City Councilmember Pawlenty suggested:tfie City staff.Consider lease space for certain administrative operations,allowing the Police Departnia to expand in the existing building. City Councilmembers asked that staff consider leasing space as ad.option, however, expressed a desire to consolidate its services at one location and further that leasing:IS not always a cheaper alternative. Mayor Egan suggested that the Citji Giiutiaii proiiide:sorrie specific direction to the City Administrator for finalizing a draft five (5) year CIP. City Councilmember Pawlenty suggested the fire station improvements be considered in 1992, more than likely as a bond referendum. He further suggested that any further consideration for financing the ice arena be held up until a final committee report is received and that park improvements be financed as..jpd0a1ed in the existing CIP document. Mayor Egan suggested that the law enforcement expansion::taie:.; isidered with the fire station referendum as a multiple question. He further suggested: iat•the City':talk to all three (3) school districts about an ice arena/pool consolidated bond referendum 'City Councilme>nt ers also suggested that the YMCA proposal may provide part of the solution for the:park facility needs acid i could help reduce the cost of a proposed ice arena/outdoor swimming pool. MayQrEgan suggested tt the capital improvements funding column include space for private contributions, fiCl> irig:schools:foundations and other revenue sources. City Councilmember McCrea stressed to the Citj:Cbuncilraiid-'staffthat our community and the school districts continue to consolidate needs to lessen duplication of facilities. fi .. Page 3/EAGAN SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING March 12, 1991 Mayor Egan summarized the propoeed:capital:improvernents budget stating that the draft 1991-1995 CIP is a working document and directedtke.: ;staf#to:iinue its research and refinement at a future City Council workshop. PERSONNEL COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION/GIN KNIGHT City Councilmember Gustafson stated that the Personnel Committee has reviewed a request by Gin Knight that the City of Eagan reimburse a surrender fee in the amount of$3,151.26 that IDS required as a result of her moving deferred compensation funds to the approved ICMA fund. He further stated that the Personnel Committee has reviewed all the.facts and feels there has been a great deal of misunderstanding on everyone's part Orar the past fifteen (15) years and due to Gin Knight's long-time employment status and dedication to ttie comrn unity as a 24%year employee, has recommended that the City allocate $3,151.26 to her ICMA'deferred compensation account. In a motion by Mayor Egan, seconded by City Councilmember McCrea,tt?e::City::Administrator was directed to place this item on the March 19, 1991 City Council agenda OTHER BUSINESS There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned at approximately 9:15 p.m. TLH• • • • Date • City Clerk • MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE • i:i***GAN, CITY COUNCIL •.•.. . Eagan, Minnesota A regular meeting of the EagaiisCitiltOtinet4iiiii.IiiIel on Tuesday, April 16, 1991, at the Eagan Municipal Center. Present were Mayor Ek,,an and Councilmembers Wachter,Gustafson,McCrea,and Pawlenty. Also present were City Administrator Hedges, Community Development Director Dale Run Ide, Director of Public Works Tom Colbert, and City Attorney James Sheldon. WNW* It was recommended that Item14:Final Plat, Fmaserve Addition, be continued to the May 7, 1991 regular City Council meeting. Pawlenty møved,Mc Oen seconded a motion to approve the agenda for the April 16, 1991 regular City Council meeting agenda as amended. Aye: 5 Nay. 0 NIS ::::::.:::.:.:.•.••:•:•:-:•:•:•:•:•:::•:•:•:•:•:-:•::-:.: The following changes were recommended to the April 2, 1991 regular City Council minutes: Pages 8 and 9, Stop Sign Petition, Diamond Drive at Sapphire Lane. All references to Safari Lane referred to in this item should be changed to Sapphire Lane. ........•.•.• Wachter moved, Pawlenty seconded a motion to apprOtie the minutes of the April 2, 1991 regular City Council minutes as amended. Aye: 5 Nay ixo1Spmy#*#4A11Ispwig:cgmcnwsER4 Senator Halberg was present to update th :Ci.tiji .2...01#01 on legislative issues. Senator Ha lberg spoke briefly about redistricting, the budget deficit, and returOing:tientling decisions to cities, counties and schools. City Administrator Hedges asked Senator Halberg about a Senate proposal which would mandate the ward system by 1994. Senator Halberg said,in his personal view,that elected officials should represent the community at large and did not see this bill going very far. DEPARTMENT HEMTBUMES4 PARKS DEPARTMENT/COMPK.EHOSIVE..FOK:MkNTENANCE MANAGEMENT PLAN •.•••••• ••.... • .•.•.• No official action was taken; however, at the request of the Advisory Parks, Recreation & Natural Resources Commission,the City Council received the Comprehensive Park Maintenance Management Plan for review. This item will be included on a tii6iTA:c4::06441:ogooda. BALLFIELD/RAHN PARK Mr.David Wyss,2108 Shale Lane,addressed the City Council regarding balls being hit into his backyard from ballfield #2 at Rahn Park. Because Mr.Wyss.fee1.5 this is a dangerous situation, he asked that ballfield #2 be scheduled only with those leagues nokekalitle*Iii.tting balls over the fence. Mr.Wyss said he would get a restraining order against such occurr*eal he had to After further discussion, Mr.Wyss said he had received a letter from Director of Parks& Recreation Vraa regarding the league assignments 4::t:he upcoming seasOii.:and added that he did not see much change between this schedule and last year's wheit:4;31:1:tac}:tr.Onlge:*.i$.:Otis situation. City Administrator Hedges said he believed most of the difficulty involved*f*:Pii:tii-y staff would address that problem. AP Page 2/EAGAN CITY COUNCIL MINUTES April 16, 1991 Item L,Final Plat,Fmaserve Additiiii was:c tiEiane;d1d'the May 7, 1991 regular City Council.meeting. A. Personnel Items Item 1. Seasonal Forestry Aides—It was recommended that the following persons be hired as seasonal forestry aides: Stanley Schneider, Steve Sheldon, and Teresa Treichel. Item 2. Seasonal Weed Inspector:Aide—It was recommended that Leroy Berg be hired as the City's Seasonal Weed Inspector Aide. Item 3. Seasonal Parks Maintenance Worlieiis--It was recommended that the following persons be hired as seasonal park workers: Seasonal Parks Maintenance Workers: Brian Banaszewski Dave Smith Brent Tait Duane Barton Mike Finnegan Joe Wilcox Brent Eichten Tyrone Johnson Velta Martin Larry Lien • Philip Larson Samuel Walker Trent Makowsky Stanley Sederstrom Seasonal Ballfield Attendants: Jason Forde Shane Johnson •• Melinda Kaltenhauser Cheri Deike Robert Parrot (1/2 Time Positic ti):::::•:.: Seasonal Park Attendants: Kim Rinehart Kim Martin Robert Parrot (1/2 Time Position::::;::•••• Evening Maintenance/Operations: Jeffrey Grubb Joshua Watschke Joseph Larkin Page 3/EAGAN CITY COUNCIL MINUTES ......... April 16, 1991 B. Final Plat Extension/Town Centrç 109.-Eip..)0.Addition It was recommended that a one. iótoMy19 1991,for the recording of the final plat for Town Centre 100 - Eighth Addition be approved C. Extension to Preliminary Mai. Gopher Eagan Industrial Park 3rd Addition It was recommended that a preliminary plat extension to.March 20, 1992,for Gopher Eagan Industrial Park 3rd Addition be approved with the following additional conditions: 8. A proposed ingress/egress e(;*nent w4l* required over the proposed driveway along the south end of Lot 2. •::•:.: :•:•:•:• :•:•:•:• •••••••• 9. The development shall upgrad;:.Knt•off:Cfpurt:y4tik.concrete curb and gutter from a point 50' south of the south property line of Lot 2 to State Hgbway 149 10. The development is required to provide for fulfillment of water quality requirements as identified in the City's Comprehensive Water Quality Management Plan (either cash or ponding area). D. Proclamation. Eagan Arbor Day.April 27. 1991.aid Eagan Arbor Month. May 1991 It was recommended that a resolution:.K.C4aiMiiii:Eagan Arbor Day and Eagan Arbor Month be approved as presented. ........ ::::::••••••• E License. Plumbers Licenses It was recommended that the following plumberiiiiie44 be approved: 1)Bjorlin Plumbing,2) Bruce Plumbing, 3) Janecky Plumbing, and 4) Regency Plumbing. F. License.Tree Service Maintenance It was recommended that the Tree Service Maintenance License for Ark Tree Service be approved with the condition that there be no application of:',"*..ii4t6cal pesticides or any other chemical substances under this license. G. Adjustment. 1991 General Fund Budget.... .•.•.•.•. ...•.•. It was recommended that the 10:94:PpPrO:,00.14.:!::!P4Pt adjustments be approved as presented. H. Project 613.Receive Petition/Authorize Feasibility Report&Detailed Plans (Willbrook Addition - Streets & Utilities) • It was recommended that the petition be received,and the feasibility report and detailed plans authorized for Project 613 (Willbrook Addition - • " ...•.•.•.•.• L Project 614. Receive Petitiolitkithorize Feasibility Report & Detailed Plans (Yankee Doodle Road/Ganal - Storm Sewer) .•.•... It was recommended that the p04tion:• ,::r.prgile#d::§14:::the feasibility report and detailed plans and specifications be authorized for Project 64:01.•aikeibii: i::REiid/Gang,1 - Storm Sewer). • r Page 4/EAGAN CITY COUNCIL MINUTES April 16, 1991 J. Contract 90-17.Approve Change Order#1 (Wells #3 & #4 - Repair) It was recommended that Change:Order'4 :�tii:t Eract'90-17(Wells#3& #4-Repair)be approved and the Mayor and City Clerk authorized:>:p execute all related documents. K. Approve Settlement Agreement,Project 466.Assessment Appeal (Hardees Restaurant) It was recommended that a Settlement Agreement and Resolution be approved authorizing the City Attorney's office to prepare the Stipulation for Settlement and the Mayor and City Clerk authorized to execute that document. L. Final Plat. Finaserve Additloii> It was recommended that the final.plat:for.F*.s.erve Addition be continued to the May 7,1991,regular City Council meeting. M. Final Plat/Manor Lake 3rd Addition It was recommended that the final plat for Manor Lake 3rd Addition be approved. N. Final Plat/Vallev Acres It was recommended that the final.:pla::.0t: 'alley:Acres be approved. O. Contract 91-01. Approve P1an0ieithorize Advertisement for Bids (T.H. 149 & Becker Road Improvements) It was recommended that the plans for Contract 91-0i 149 and Becker Road Improvements) be approved and the advertisement for bids authorized subject to MnDOT's final approval. P. Contract 89-05,Approve Change Order#3 (Skyline Road/Sibley Hills Drive-Streets &Utilities) It was recommended that Change Order:#3.to Contra 1:89-05(Skyline Road/Sibley Hills Drive-Streets & Utilities) be approved and the Mayor and::6 y.Clerk;:autfiori d td to execute all related documents. Q. Contract 89-05,Final Payment/Acceptance (Skyline Road/Sibley Hills Drive-Streets & Utilities) It was recommended that the 7tf i.:04:final payment_:im:the amount of$28,61526 for Contract 89-05 (Skyline Road/Sibley Hills Drive-Streets:$c: tilites):tti:Browa:&Cris,Inc.,be approved and formal acceptance of perpetual City maintenance authorized subject to all related warranty conditions. Gustafson moved,Wachter seconded a motion to approve the Consent Agenda as amended. City Administrator Hedges then asked:tti:rlarily:What fees were to be waived with the shooting range• being developed by the City of Apple Valley;::Because the:Cif of Eagan is participating in the development of the shooting range, a question has arisen as:to out-of-pocket costs.and how they relate to storm sewer and water quality costs. He said if the water quality'aiid storm sewer cosfs'are waived,the City Council may wish to enter into an agreement which would allow for Ofecollection of thosearges if the property is sold to a private owner at a later date. Aye: 5 Nay. 0 Page 5/EAGAN CITY COUNCIL MINUTES April 16, 1991 flAWOHEARIX4S. FINAL ASSESSMEtd:HGARfI■fG/PROJECT 524 Mayor Egan introduced this iten i{ss Project 524, Final Assessment Hearing for Johnny Cake Ridge Road, Street Improvements. Director Of Works Colbert explained the background and scope of the project. He said one significant difference from the final assessment roll as compared to the preliminary roll is the subsequent approval of Council policy whereby the trailway assessment was deleted from the original project and is not being proposed to be assessed with this final assessment roll. Mr. Colbert said all rates compare favorably to the original feasibility.report amounts. Mr. William Bush, representing:t}ie Willmtib:family, said their primary area of concern is the street. Mr.Bush said that in the 1970's,the Willmus familywas.asked to dedicate a 100 foot right-of-way. He said they had done this with the understanding that..the.adjoining,property.,would only be assessed for a 32 foot roadway. Mr.Bush said the other concern had to do:witb:widen gthe.approach to the Diffley/Johnny Cake Ridge Road intersection. He said because this widening was''a'community benefit, not a neighborhood benefit, that assessment should also be scaled back to 32 feet. Mr. Bush pointed out that the widening of the intersection was not part of the original proposal and has been done for County and City purposes. Mr. Bush presented a formal objection to the assessments. Discussion then ensued regarding the points raise41;10Mr.Bush. Director of Public Works Colbert said in a lower assessment pertained to an earlier phase that correspondence referred to earlier by Mr.Busiz:i:ega;.d�rg� � pe p of Johnny Cake Ridge Road. Mr. Colbert::weut:nn to.say:he was not aware of any agreement whereby the Willmus property would be assessed for 32:feet of right-o€=way rather than 44 feet. Council further discussed whether or not this item should be continued: aliow staff to work with the Willmus' or whether the project should be approved noting their objection. Mr.Btis i;;aid to y;would prefer to avoid the legal process and first explore means to resolve the issue through the local McCrea moved, Gustafson seconded a motion to postpone to the May 7, 1991 regular City Council meeting the public hearing and final assessment roll for Project 524 (Johnny Cake Ridge Road - Street Improvements). Aye: 5 Nay: 0 SPECIAL PERM IT/8': NCE St30OUNDING SHOOTING RANGE Gustafson moved,Wachter secoeded a motion:to approve a special permit for an 8'fence surrounding the shooting range at Valley Acres. SENECA DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT/SCHEDULE REVISION Mayor Egan introduced this item as Consideration of Seneca Plant Development Agreement-Proposed Revision to Schedule Regarding Incinerator Odor.Control Improvements. Before entertaining a motion to continue this item to the May 7, 1991 regular.City:Critic.meeting, neighbors who wished to address the issue were given that opportunity. Ms. Betty Bassett, of 2101 Wutheriiig Heights Road,voiced her concerns regarding any changes in the schedule for the installation of odor controlling equipment at the:Seneca Plant. She asked that neighbors be included in any discussion of conditions::: :;p. t:Pnsions o€.:that;_:time schedule. Ms. Bassett expressed the neighbors frustrations with the process anci:iSkiaiiiikiiiitittitincil protect the residents from this obnoxious development. r Page 6/EAGAN CITY COUNCIL MINUTES April 16, 1991 • Ms.Bea Blomquist,of 4514 Oak Chase Road,spoke on behalf of the Chamber of Commerce and local be accelerated as many neighbors She asked that odor contr�lig::�t�lsriiestt::i�,.:... ' y eighbors and businesses in the community were affected b i:flie'Sene¢a:Plaift:''' Mary Ramnarine,of 3785 Nicols: oad,asked that the City Council hold the MWCC to their promises. Ms.Mike Hazel,of 2129 Silver Bell Road,said because the MWCC could not meet its goals,they should be advised that any future expansion would not be available in our community. Gustafson moved,Wachter second a motion to approve a continuation of consideration of the Seneca Plant Development Agreement schedule:ievision regarding incinerator odor control improvements to the May 7, 1991 regular City Council meeting. Aye:: 5 Nay:_:.0 CONDITIONAL.USE;.PERMIT/SPECIAL USE PERMIT OI'�1�: R.L.JOHNS STME T:COMPANY Mayor Egan introduced this item as a Conditional Use Permit for R.L.Johnson Investment Company, Inc. to Allow Outdoor Storage in a LI (Light Industrial)District and a Special Permit for a Fence in Excess of Six Feet Tall on Lot 1, Block 1, R.L.Johnson 2nd Addition Located Along Yankee Doodle Road and Yankee Doodle Drive in the Southeast Quarter of Section 8 and the Northeast Quarter of Section 17. Director of Community Development Runkle said that a letter had bee-n:received from the applicant indicating a willingness to consider relocation of the outdoor storage.to;: i;:altiernate site on the property. Mr. Runkle said the appropriate action then would be to continue:it::ti theJiuly. ;,:1991 regular City Council meeting thereby allowing the revised plans to go through the P1xr►iiing. Commissiain, back to the City Council and then relocation implemented before the first meeting in July;:: e::said.if it'isn't implemented by that time,the conditional use permit would be canceled. Wachter moved, Pawlenty seconded a motion to continue to the July 2, 1991 regular City Council meeting a conditional use permit to allow outside storage of motor vehicles on Lot 1,Block 1,R.L.Johnson 2nd Addition and a special use permit for a fence in excess of six feet tall as presented. Aye: 5 Nay: 0 FRONT YARD SETBACK VARIANCE/1612 BLACSHAWB LAKE DRIVE• Mayor Egan introduced this item aa�a Variancefor Bob:Michalek of 19'to the Required 30'Front Yard Building Setback for 1612 Blackhawk I.aice: >nve;'Iytit 7;Bair , Blackhawk Glen 3rd Addition. Director of Community Development Runkle identified the location, provided a brief explanation as to the request and pointed out that one objection had been received. Mr. Tim Jacobson, who said he was the architect and owner's brother, said they had contacted the neighbors so was surprised by the objection... e:we ii:gn:*.:explain the owner's attempts to find a location for this addition because of the difficult topography';:tHe stated that:the variance is necessary due to the recent knee surgery of both owners which has made the:li cement of their'l Me unusable. He said in an effort to centralize all household activities on the main level, the owner's office, laundry room, recreation room and storage area would be incorporated in the existing garde and the proposed.aitiition would be used as the garage. He said the owners had considered moving, however,:;it:was;not;:considered economically feasible because the home was purchased in 1989 and it would be severa]: i's:i tt>t'e`t*: gtd recoup any closing costs. • Page 7/EAGAN CITY COUNCIL MINUTES .•.•.•.•. April 16, 1991 ......... The Council then discussed ivhetk.K.or. :*:41.404::elisted for the granting of the variance. It was generally agreed that this is a personal 14;14;:i0t:::it were granted, it would run with the land. Additional concerns were expressed regai:Clini limiting Off-street parking for this home as well as how sizable ..•.•. a 19 foot variance would be. McCrea moved, Gustafson seconded a motion to deny a variance for Bob Michalek of 19 feet to the required 30 foot front yard building setback for property located at 1612 Blackhawk Lake Drive. Aye: 5 Nay: 0 PRELIMINARYPLAT/PARK CENTER 2ND ADDITION SENOR HOILI8ING COMPLEX •:•::::: - Mayor Egan introduced this iteme*.S:a Prelimiaiy Plat for the Park Center 2nd Addition/City of Eagan, Consisting of Approximately 6.8 Acres iif.PrevicaY:Zoned R-4 (Multi-Family) Acres for a Senior Citizen Housing Complex Located Along the Nottll:Skle:pf.A2arkcentx:Prive in the Southeast Quarter of Section 30. Director of Community Development Roniele:dien:AitiOliea:die:teckground and the scope of the project. He added that one issue requiring additional clarification related to park dedication fees. Mr. Runkle said that a program had been developed allowing congregate dining for seniors in the community, as well as making the dining area available for other senior activities and events. Mr.Victor Zeuthen,of Arvid&Elness Architects,Inc:,:Oesented a drawing of the planned concept for the senior housing project After explaining the design:A4*inaterials of the structure,Mr.Zeuthen said the project was coming in 15 percent under buclget::;:jik:440 these affordable units, one-third would be two bedroom and two-thirds would be one beiftOtti::•:•:..... Discussion then ensued regarding theinintiOtp.f.:44ndicapped units available,congregate dining and the availability of DARTS. Mark infers, of the Dakota County said he had met with a number of Eagan senior citizens and 130 households had contacted the HRA'knit:been placed on the project's interested list. After further discussion regarding waiver of the park dedication fees, Gustafson moved, Wachter seconded a motion to approve the preliminary plat for Park Center 2nd Addition for the City of Eagan Senior Housing Complex with the waiver of park dedication fees in exchange for scheduled use by other seniors of the facility and subject to the following conditions::::: ......:.:•:•:•:•:i: 1. These standard conditioni:4iilif iiit«prOaris'idopted by Council action on July 10, 1990 shall be complied with: Bl, e4t4, C5, G1, Hi. •. • ..• ........ :.....•.• 2. Snow fencing shall be plated arounitt:tfie existing trees prior to any grading. :.:.:.:::.:.:.::::::::::::::::•:•:•:•:.::•::•:•.•..... ::.:•:.:.: 3. The 21 outdoor parking••iiiiii•diall iilloi4:ctis shown on the site plan. Director of Community Development Runkle pointed out that one-to-one underground parking is being provided for the facility; however, outside parking is under normal requirements. Mr. Runkle said based on other existing facilities presently being operated by.:*•:!113A,.a large number of outside parking spaces was not deemed necessary. :•:•:.:•:•: .....•.•.. Aye: 5 Nay: 0 •:-:•:• Gustafson moved, Wachter seconded a motion to nuth6iize payment in the amount of$957,100 from the specially dedicated senior housing fun0i0.1Aie.:J;.1Mikt::(li0i:Oity's portion of the Senior Housing Project. Page 8/EAGAN CITY COUNCIL MINUTES :•:•:•:•: April 16, 1991 City Administrator Hedges statedthat1•11e.:4m944.94•Rally intended for payment to the HRA was$1 million; however, the $957,100 payment i*iiiii*.44:4tif:4**00:for interest the City would have accrued had the $1 million been released to the HRAiilielffe'6.1 iheisloject. Aye: 5 Nay 0 CITY CODE AMENDMENTS/PYLON SIGN REGULATION Mayor Egan introduced this item as an Ordinance Amendment, City of Eagan,Amending Eagan City Code Chapter 4, Entitled *Construction Lkcnsing Permits and Regulations, Including Signs, Excavations and Mobile Parks: by Amending Section 413:;;Regardi*"Placement, Erection and Maintenance of Signs: and Adopting by Reference Eagan City Code:qapter 1:a41 Section 4.99. City Administrator Hedges said that this item was considered by the Advisory Planning Commission at their March 28,1991 regular meeting and they had recommended approval. Mr. Hedges saide:Actipplya4,prompted by a request made by the City Council in the fall of 1990. ..:.••.:.::.::.::::::::::::::::•:•:•:•:::::•:::::::::: Director of Community Development Runlde said that the proposed ordinance deals with more than just billboards and attempts to address the entire sign issue. Various questions arose regarding real estate signs, political signs and the new spacing between pylon signs. Director of Community Development Runkle sai.cl:t.40:1=04ause for sale signs could not be regulated by content, the new ordinance would regulate them:. 5i.:4*;:stii.(iiiii and size. When it was asked whether or not political signs should be removed within a*1:aftei:iii election,City Attorney Sheldon pointed out that political signs are allowed by the State to remain tiii.:days after an elsction. In regard to the spacing between pylon signs, Director of Community Development Runkid:00:10t0:9tit.tliat while the spacing is 100 feet rather than 300 feet, the height and size of the pylon signs has been rethiCiii:::COOcilinember Pawlenty then listed a number of areas within the new ordinance that may need to be changed or.C.faiifie41. Staff will use such direction in refining the final draft of the sign ordinance. Mr. Wendell Widstrom, a resident in the audience, suggested that the sign ordinance also give some thought to the maintenance of signs. He said a number of signs are leaning and are not being maintained. • Councilmember Pawlenty said that:4e:W0ed sopl. :pp4imunities regulate the date political signs may be placed in advance of an election. He.014.:perliati *:b6iiiiCil would want to proceed with this ordinance and then bring an amendment dealing w4litical s4tiii at a later date. Director of Community Development Runkle noted additionally that banners had.pot been addressed in this ordinance but would be taken up in the future. Mayor Egan questioned a provistetuminOcertain portion of the application fee if the application is denied. He said he could not recall arii.:40:000.§04:.*.1:10**Ich a policy was included and recommended its removal. Pawlenty moved, Gustafson seconded a motion to continue the proposed amendment to Eagan's City Code, Section 4.20 regarding placement, erection and maintenance of signs to the May 7, 1991 regular City Council meeting with direction to staff to considerthepain.ts that were raised and to bring back a revised draft. Aye: 5 Nay 0 0.*#1414f.k.At1lt:M7PRDA .•.•.•.• ........ PROJECT 89r1R/MANOR LAKE 2D ADDITION ::::::::: .•.•... .•.•.•. • Gustafson moved,Wachter seconiled a motion ici acknoWledge completion of public improvements for Project 89-R (Manor Lake 2nd Addition: $0.0iiiiikUitifig)::iiiid to authorize perpetual City maintenance subject to appropriate warranty provisions. Aye: 5 Nay 0 V Page 9/EAGAN CITY COUNCIL MINUTES April 16, 1991 VISITORS TO BE HEARD Mr. Bob Middlemist, the develOpei:Of Maiioi Bike 3rd Addition, asked that the Council consider changing the fmal plat approval received:eslier in the meeting to include thirteen lots rather than the eleven that were approved. Mr. Middlemist saitI:iecause of slow sales in bonging the last two years,he had sold only . five lots each year. Because it was necessary to cut costs,he said he did not install the required,temporary cul- de-sacs in the Manor Lake 2nd. Mr. Middlemist said that in order to eliminate the necessity of installing temporary cul-de-sacs in the Manor Lake 3rd Addition,staff had required that two lots be removed from that plat. He said he would like these lots reinstated. Mr.Middlemist pointed out that the overall the number of lots in the development would not exceed:7.2 and it would be preferable to plat them now rather than in a later phase. Director of Public Works Colbertt::said platting 11 lots instead of 13 in the Manor Lake 3rd Addition would eliminate the need for a temporary.,.cul-de-sac.aud,reduce.costs. Mr. Colbert said City policy has been that if a dead end street is to be platted,•i:.tseiii*Oia0.:..440,COust be constructed to allow for maintenance as well as accommodation for emergency vehicles. Mr. Colbert said there was reluctance on the part of the developer in the 2nd addition to install the temporary cul-de-sacs and it was determined that the elimination of these two lots in the 3rd would also eliminate the need to install the temporary cul-de-sacs. The City Council then discussed the appropriateness of considering a change to the final plat for Manor Lake 3rd Addition. Because the final plat has already..been a iroved by Council action, any change to that action would require an amendment. It was recommitiff ::that.Mr. Middlemist continue to work with staff in an attempt to resolve the issue and if an amendment is.appropriate, it will be returned to the City Council for action. • BOULEVARD:TRI E PLANTING • Mr.Rick Packer,of the Sienna Corporation,presented a latter to the City Council regarding the planting of boulevard trees. Mr.Packer's letter is attached as Exhibit A. It was recommended that staff meet to discuss the merits of Mr. Packer's suggestion and then present their recommendations at a future meeting of the City Council. EASEMENT ACQUISITION/PRtwCT 6Q4..($>✓!t✓HER ROAD IMPROVEMENTS) City Attorney Sheldon said that::a$ a part:•:t the Becker Road improvements, the City has been negotiating easement acquisitions. Yorkton.Industrial Partnership has offered to sell an easement to the City for$32,000. If that amount is within what* appraiser says the property is worth,Mr. Sheldon asked that the City Council authorize a settlement of the:easement gotiations Gustafson moved,McCrea seconded a motion to approve the acquisition of an easement for Project 600 (Becker Road Improvements)from Yorkton Industrial Partnership in the amount of$32,000,if appraised at that value. Aye: 5 Nay: 0 ESCRow.POLICY • City Administrator Hedges asked fqc?clrificatioif'of:Cily Council action regarding outstanding escrow balances. He said a year ago,the City Council had been apprisei9:of the total outstanding escrow owed the City for various developments. One consideration had been to deny:.zny new development if the developer had an outstanding escrow balance from a previous: troject. Because aj4i.mber of new developments in the City could be impacted,City Administrator Hedges sat".d. t f:.bas.been ici icsant to strictly enforce this policy. Mr.Hedges said three particular developments and he asked that the Council provide clarification of this public policy issue. Page 10/EAGAN CITY COUNCIL MINUTES April 16, 1991 Councilmember Pawlenty said that if an escrow amount is legitimately in dispute,the City will have to remain flexible. He said he would like:::si€irtie::: : :;::of:cation, however, what the problems are City Administrator Hedges said staff would developers with a history of problems to the City Council for their consideration. Cowic?lmember McCrea again recommended that an independent hearing process be initiated to resolve these issues; TRINITY LONE OAK CHURCH/DEVELOPMENT FEES After discussion, Pawlenty moved, Wachter seconded a motion to reconsider Council action on December 18, 1990 regarding the waiver:of fees associated with the Trinity Lone Oak Church remodeling/ expansion. Aye: 5 Nay 0 CHECKLIST Wachter moved,Egan seconded:a:motion•to:VrOVe::t ie:checklist dated March 31,1991 in the amount of$1,800,224.81 and the checklist dated the ariibunt of$854,27054. Aye: 5 Nay. 0 EXECUTIVE SESSION/ADJOURNMENT The City Council adjourned the regular meeting to an executive session to consider attorney/client privileged information at 10:05 p.m. Those in attendance::were Mayor Egan, Councilmembers Gustafson, McCrea, Pawlenty and Wachter, City Administrator::14edges City Attorney Sheldon and attorneys Mike Dougherty and Ken Hall from that office..•:•The:executivve:'session was adjourned at approximately 11:15 p.m. KF bF EAGAN E. J. VanOverbeke City Clerk ,- / . _ - EXHIBIT A ::. S6tie 608.4940 Viking Drive•Minneapolis.Minnesota 55435•612-835-2808 CORPORATION ...... . .. ... . - M April 10, 1991 Jim Sturm ...•.•.• . ..•.•.•. „ .. City Planner •::::::. ..•.• ........ •••• City of Eagan • •::::::: . ' 3830 Pilot Knob Rd. -: . Eagan, MN 55122 :::::•••:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•::::::::-:•:•:::•:.:.:•:.:::::::. Re: Boulevard Trees Oaks of Bridgewater 1st & 2nd Additions Dear Jim, • ....,::.•:•:•: As you know, through my workwie Builders Association of Minnesota, the Minnesota.S#0. the American Society of Landscape Architecturefidthe *innesota Shade Tree Advisory Committee, I have always had this "thing" about the fact that many cities in the metrd-ii*071p.)lot require developers to install boulevard trees in iiiiii4.404divisions; some cities don't even require a front yard tree. -Terongly believe that urban .-- trees, particularly boulevard trees, are a very important part in the creation of the neighborhoods we develop. Unfortunately, many municipalities don't share this concern; they are more than happy to impose burdensome tree preservation ordinances but not willing to take any initiative of their own toward addressing the problem of urban trees4t14 #e **10ative quality of our cities. .:: :::::** .•:: :::::::i:*.' Until now I have not really had any cause to request the City of Eagan to allow me to plant bolAlevard trees in our subdivisions ; another controversial rtisade . s not usually foremost in my efforts to get throug40000.*nt process. However, in the instance of the Oaks ot .trid4ei.iitet,. I feel it necessary to formally request to place shade trees in the boulevard. Sienna, as well as the builder (Charles Cudd Co. ) , feel that the planting of street trees in this subdivision would greatly enhance its appearance and the overalleeimage of the subdivision. These trees would be plaiitkAtttont of each lot in addition to the 100 - 120 mature spe06e and iidi!Fay pine that are going to be planted in the 2nd Addition. In iiii 1st Addition we will be planting mostly shade :trees due to :Vie trees that we were able to preserve during constif4Otion..„--„e Planners • Developers • Contractors I am aware of the City4.1 :zec:.::..ent: allowing trees to be planted 10 feet from the back .o.f the curb. Unfortunately, I don't think that that is close enatigh to achieve the desired result. Additionally, in the Oaks of Bridgewater, this is where the electric, telephone, and cable T.V. is located (the R.O.W. is 50 feet creating a 10 foot boulevard) . If we are not allowed to plant closer to the curb, we will have to be back approximately 20 feet from the curb to stay clear of gas/electric/telephone utilities. As a landscape architect, you know that being this far back totally neglects the:::philosophy and purpose of boulevard trees; they become just a "front yard" tree. I am familiar with all the reasons cities have for not wanting boulevard trees. They range from 'ridiculous (who rakes the leaves) , to exaggerated (loss of snow storage) to real (who maintains the tree) . In response to the issue of maintenance, I see no reason why homeowners can't be made to maintain these trees. Homeowners are made to maintain the boulevard, they can just as easily maintain the trees..::::;::::: At any rate, Sienna would like too request permission to plant boulevard trees 6-8' behind' the ::curb in the Oaks of Bridgewater 1st and 2nd Additions. We::.:would` be happy to plant trees that are fairly compact such as ash or linden to minimize the potential for trimming. Please contact me as soon as convenient to tell me the best way to proceed with this request. As I've said before, your help in assisting us to make this subdivision a better neighborhood has been greatly appreciated. I will look forward to hearing from you. Ve truler y yours, • Rick ack Project Manager , . , . 4r" .olb :•:.:.:-: \ :::::•:::: ......•• 46,4, - fir 1- -fi "■• A ..........-...-..-•••--...-.----..--.. r .........................:.:.:.:.:.::::::::,...x.::::.:... rtti It j ...--- ..1,,A IPA' 11 .. 1 All .t •,4 Aoger 1""... .:....:-: k ' . ::::-........ :-.::-,t,1,-1,,,11,1111L... _410111111ra , ••••••••• :**...lidke.-:"11111 --='46--4c4t ' ..:::::..:'..NA :.:.::: J ,6 .......• :::::::::::::..m.:::::::::::::.::::: A ,. .••::.:::::::. ,1 .....:::::::::::::::::::::: • ........•• ... ........•• :.:.: • eie• . I k•-i.e . 1. .:•::: BLY4 . A. , • ri,\IT7 - . . ........••. ... •••• .... .................,, . , _ AfrFeer::::::•::• . -- _ .. ..... •••:::::....e.:.....:: .. - • . • ..•.•.•.•.. ••:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•. .••:....:•:•:::.: ::::•:•:•::••••••••:•:•:•:• :::::::::::::::.:.:.:.:., :::.:.:.:.. .::::.::::::.:.• 1 ( i .::.:•:.: :.::::::: :.:.....2:::..............:•:::.:.:.:?:::::::••••••••••••••••• • • „::::::::::::•:•:•:.:..:.::::::::::::::•:.::::::::::: ......„........:.......x.:•:•:.:.::::::::::::::::::::: 14 )K - X ................ lo a ... ....:::::::::::::::::::::::::•:.... 1=-'. 10 .:::::::::.:.::••••"•......:::::::::::.:.. .:::::::::::•.- •••.:::::::::.. •:::::::.:: Ockr13 . -• ::::::::.:.:.:.:.•..........:.:.:.:.::::::::::::::::•:•:.:: ::::.::.....::•.•••::.:::::::::.:.:....:....:•:•:•••:•: