The URL can be used to link to this page

05/16/1995 - City Council Public Works Committee• • • AGENDA PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE TUESDAY MAY 16, 1995 4:30 P.M. POLICE FACILITY CONFERENCE ROOM (Second Floor) 4:30 I. ROLL CALL AND ADOPTION OF AGENDA 4:35 II. ANALYSIS OF EXPENSES/PROJECT 661R (Yankee DoodleRd & Sibley Terminal Ind. Park) III. OTHER BUSINESS 6:00 IV. ADJOURNMENT MEMO — city of eagan TO: PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE FROM: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES DATE: MAY 10, 1995 SUBJECT: PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE MEETING The Public Works Committee meeting is scheduled for Tuesday, May 16, 1995, at 4;30 p.m., in the Police Facility Conference Room (second floor). Attached is a copy of a report that includes an analysis of related expenses as requested by the City Council. It was not clear at the meeting on May 2 what specific information Mike Gresser was requesting, however, the report has made an effort to address the questions and data • being requested by the Public Works Committee that was included in a memo from the City Administrator to the Director of Public Works. A copy of that memo is attached for your review. • A copy of this report will be presented to Mr. Gresser at the meeting on Tuesday with a detailed verbal review by the consulting engineer, if necessary. This should mitigate any misunderstanding or misinterpretation in advance of the meeting. It will also help the Public Works Committee focus on those issues that are of specific concern to Mr. Gresser. If you need any additional information, please feel free to contact the City Administrator at any time. City Administ or cc: Tom Colbert, Director of Public Works Attachments TLH/jeh • MEMO city of eagan TO: DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS COLBERT DIRECTOR OF FINANCE VANOVERBEKE FROM: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES DATE: MAY 4, 1995 SUBJECT: PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE REQUEST TO AUDIT ENGINEERING COSTS FOR PROJECT 661R At the regular City Council meeting held on Tuesday, May 2, the City Council directed the Public Works Committee to review (audit) all engineering costs, overhead (Non Construction), associated with Project 661 R. City Councilmember Hunter left a voice mail message and asked that certain information be included in this detailed audit review: 1) Each individual engineering expense should be listed; 2) A "brief" paragraph should describe what work was performed for each of the engineering expenses; and 3) Copies of the work product should be made available for the Public Works Committee review. Councilmember Hunter felt it was justified that the burden be placed on the engineering firm for providing this information. I feel it is only appropriate that Engineering and Finance work in concert to prepare and provide the other related information. It is my understanding that we will have a Public Works Committee meeting at approximately 4:30 p.m. on Tuesday, May 16. City Administrator cc: Public Works Committee Members City Councilmember Hunter City Councilmember Wachter • TLHIvmd SCHEDULE I N g0 < O U. 114 O a.. a 3 •c c E 1= N N 0 OA ¢ • 1CO • f P O O CV Z Z Oz < 0 7�Q(QZ F- d1 < 0 Q O 3 0 1— u U 0 2A-).3';;;; O p p O A N O O N !7 P! O OO O T r r N Is o O 0 O 7'0 10 0 w • o • A A 0 0 N N c 0 0 n • O C • C CO w _e E v f C E • 0 Construction r) • O O N Ql O 0 0 0 0 A N 0 10.0 0 O c i c • • s • L • • W5.• ,.•• v . 04, E a N c c ° E c O •• v c m u.. • < ° 19 qn I y c c• ;ie.. O c'v 7 • • 1 09 0 d-." 0 <U0SILA 0 O • O O o 114 O nII • 11 or O o II O u og II • •• •N • r • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 1 N 1. O N or or • • • • • fl . • 11 00 • • A 11 N 17 • N it —^ • 11 • • • II• o H o II o , 0.• 11 O O • • •• • or II • bet • O 0. •0 •• • • • r) 0 M 1 : I • O • O O • O O 1 oo• • • A 0e. •1 • O O a0 I • o oPI• 0 0 1 • • • • • H • O O II O O H • a 0 0 n • •H N • ii • • •N • 0 o n • P t! N • II • o et II• • n • N co 11 • 0 • N • • • • 1— N • 0 1-• N < • ZZ ♦ Uw• w 00 F IL • J: 0 Z J ¢ w • • a 2 • i W • CO OL • o 04 O h A n I 8h f 4 n 0 N N N • F N U ylr CC 0 aU Q UW O g O C f 1-2 0 O2 W m N N W SCHEDULE I 0 0 U < U.1 U u. !I4 O O ao m gd UN FFap, W U 0 6 C 7 Uv O` (.1 c J N N c 0 m c W c 0' W c 73 E w E v 2 0 cr Construction 0 D 0 0 n f n O 9 0 V. 0 '0 4)) 0 0 0 l') 10CO 0 01 .0 N' .� 0 0 m co m 0 r) 0 0 co N 0) 10 09 a a0 M a N oO '0 O O" O O .► a f Y ✓ O N N N O 7 f f N N n IN O 0. co N. � co 0 O ' O aQ O 14 N 0 1 0 O N .0 0 ' v f co CO O 0 N • 0 0 0 )-0 P N (0 co N - - CW o o o O 0 n'q o c I, cl n ON n 0 n '0 o m in h 0 h O N a0CO v f o 0 o o 0 0 0 0- 1- M N m Ps. N �, uV) N q¢ N E v F U y cW a a w a cr Ili w m J a w U :0 R-.1=-- 0 0C C U.. 0• 0 O a° cN z 0 CO lL u O A sw w F cy g U ZWI b :e C y U a U m cv m k J 0 a cc coU¢vro Ew J. 4, a rrraaraaa raraararaaaa3 ******rraraf I***********. 4 3 a8 Q .+ 0 v V a Other costs do not include easement costs. • • • 4% Administration Fee Reimburse General Fund for costs associated with special assessment projects. .04 x 21,371.76 = $854.87 On this project, the City's Engineering Department incurred time valued at $5,787 administering this project. 'These are for costs directly related to improvement projects such as project accounting, record generation, and monitoring of levied assessments, engineering staff time related to improvement, and other costs such as the City administration, police patrol/response, etc. • • • PROJECT 661 CITY STAFF TIME THRU 02/15/95 AMOUNT AMOUNT (ACTUAL) (X 2) A PRELIM REPORT PREP B PRELIM SURVEYING C DESIGN SURVEYING D DESIGN E PLAN & SPEC PREP/REVIEW F CONTRACT MANAGEMENT G CONSTRUCTION STAKING H INSPECTION J EASEMENT/RIGHT OF WAY K FINAL ASSESSMENTS L MISCELLANEOUS N DEVELOPMENT CONT PREP S UTILITY INSPECTION TOTAL CITY STAFF TIME 2,418.75 240.00 235.00 4,837.50 0.00 0.00 480.00 0.00 470.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2,893.75 5,787.50 • Engineering These are all costs incurred by technical professional services such as Engineering, Soils & Material Testing, Surveying, Contract Management, Construction Inspection, etc. • • • • Maier, Stewart & Associates (MSA) Braun Intertec $33,456.23 1.97113 $35,427.36 Allocated to Project 685 (Terminal Dr.) (19.8200.00) Total Engineering Costs $15,607.36 1,6 4 3 • 2 3 + 7820 • 33-L._ 1, .7 3 1 • 4 4 + 1,:676.93+ 702 • 96+, 1,0 0 5 - 7 4 + 1,457. 1 2+_7,t.7,- 2, 2,0 4 9 • 4.3 + : .1, 6 74 5.1>+ 9 4 4 • 0 6 + 4 9 • 7 3 ± 1,01 2 • 37+ 6 2 • 3 3 ± 3,430 • 33+ 5,300 • 53+ 9 3 1. 2 0+ 4 5 3. 3 2+ 357.84 +L' 3 2c 1 3. 9 5 0 la k 3 3 9 • 2 5 ;- N'` 1, 6 1 5. 0 0+ 3 4,7 8 5. 0 8 0 3 4,7 8 5 • Maier Stewart - not billed '' 3 L., . Y Maier Stewart - billed not paid les IV $35,427.36 Amounts to Project 685 (Terminal Drive) (19,820.00) Amount included in Project 661R $15,607.36 05-15-95 01:34PM FROM CITY OF EAGAN TO MAINTENANCE P002/002 • Allocation Basis The allocation basis was front feet. In Project 661 there was a total of 8,514 f.f., of that 6,551 f.fis related to Terminal Drive and 1,963 f.£ to Yankee Doodle Road. When the roll was being prepared, MSA submitted an analysis of their bill, that assigned $24,144 of the engineering costs to Project 661. In addition, Braun Intertec had submitted a bill for pavement testing in the amount of $1,615. Project 661R approved a reduced scale, of the original project (661), however, the same properties were being assessed for the project. Because of the change in project scope, certain costs were removed from Project 661 and are being carried forward to a future project (685). The engineering costs were allocated in the following manner Allocated to Allocated to Project 685 Project 661R YQrtlox $illinp RAtia .COSI R ri MSA, Inc. $24,144 Braun Intertec • 1,615 Total 125,75.2 6,551ff/8,514f.ft .§.1.21M 1,963ffI8.514f.f §1,222 BRAUN' • INTERTEC REICE CLIENT: Stan Lexvolo City of Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55122 • Yankee Doodle Road Overlay Bituminous Testing CITY 8 661-R Eagan, MN FOR SERVICES RENDERED FROM CONSULTING SERVICES NON -SALARY EXPENSES AM0uNT OF TIiiIS INVOICE AMOUNT PREVIOUSLY INVOICED INVOICE PLEASE REMIT TO Braun Intertec Corporation SDS 12-0946 • P.O. Box 86 Minneapolis, Minnesota 55486-0946 (612)946-6000 • Fax(612)946-6001 Page 1: 1 INV. DATE : 12/20/94 INV©ICE 1 : 054806 PROJECT 8 : BODX-94-302 CLIENT 1IR : E01205 CLIENT REF: 1661-R 11/05/94 THROUGH 12/02/94 16.68 . 00 PLEASE PAY THIS AMOUNT 16.68 TOTAL INVOICE REFLECTS A 102 DISCOUNT OFF FEE SCHEDULE 16.88 339.25 Please pay from this invoice and include remittance copy with payment. Terms: Due on receipt, 1'/2% per month after 30 days, 18% annual percentage rate. Engineering, environmental and pavement consulting services. BRAUN' • INTERTEC CLIENT: Stan Le zv o l d City of Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55122 CONSULTING SERVICES DETAIL • • Senior Engineering Assistant HOUR S .25 .25 INVOICE PLEASE REMIT TO Braun Intertec Corporation SDS 12-0946 • P.O. Box 86 Minneapolis, Minnesota 55486-0946 (612) 946-6000 • Fax (612) 946-6001 Page 1: INV. DATE : IN#OICE # : PROJECT # CLIENT 1 : CLIENT REF: RATE 67.50 2 12/20/94 054806 800X-94-302 E01205 #661-R ## TOTAL PROJECT BODX-94-302 Please pay from this invoice and include remittance copy with payment. Terms: Due on receipt, 1 1/2% per month after 30 days, 18% annual percentage rate. Engineering, environmental and pavement consulting services. AMOUNT 16.88 16.88 16.88 s:assassssss INVOICE BRAUN" � INTERTEC CLIENT: Stan Lexvolc City of Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagans MN 55121 • Yankee Doodle Road Overlay Bituminous testing CITY k 661-K Eagan, MN PLEASE REMIT TO Braun Intertec Corporation SDS 12-0946 • P.O. Box 86 Minneapolis, Minnesota 55486-0946 (612)946-6000 • Fax(612)946-6001 RECEtVED N c V 2 9 1997 Page 4: 1 INV. DATE : 11/23/94 INVOICE # : 053605 PROJECT # : 6ODX-94-30L CLIEN : E01205 CLIEN Ir� L FUR SERVICES RENDERED FROM 10/08/94 THROUGH 11/04/94 CONSULTING SERVICES NON -SALARY EXPENSES PLEASE PAY THIS AMOUNT AMOUNT UF THIS INVOICE AMOUNT PREVIOUSLY INVOICED Tt TAL INVOICE REFLECTS A l0X DISCOUNT OFF FEE SCHEDULE 4_ 339.25 1 .00 ObIS Please pay from this invoice and include remittance copy with payment. Terms: Due on receipt, 11h% per month after 30 days, 18% annual percentage rate. Engineering, environmental and pavement consulting services. 20.'25 319.u0 .339.25 INVOICE BRAUN' • INTERTEC CLIENT: Stan Lexvolc City of Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55120 CONSULTING SERVICtS DETAIL Data ano Word Processing NUN -SALARY EXPENSES DETAIL PLEASE REMIT TO Braun Intertec Corporation SDS 12-0946 • P.O. Box 86 Minneapolis, Minnesota 55486-0946 (612)946-6000 • Fax(612)946-6001 RECEIVED N O V 2 9 1994 Page #: 2 INV. DATE : 11/23/94 INVOICE 4 : 053605 PROJECT a : BODX-94-301 CLIENT * : E01205 CLIENT REF: #661-R HOURS RATE AMOUNT .50 40.50 20.25 direct Expenses MPL ; TE STIN , DEPARTMENT Rice Specific Gravity (ASTM D 2041) 0 Extraction 'ASTI', 0 C172) Extracted aggregate 9raaati (MSIM C 136) Marshall bencity Testing Triple specimen (ASTM D 1559) .50 2u.15 QTY RATE AMOUNT 1.00 37.0000 37.00 2.00 69.2500 138.50 2.00 46.7500 93.50 1.00 test 50.0000 50.00 ** TOTAL PROJECT BLDX-94-302 Please pay from this invoice and include remittance copy with payment. Terms: Due on receipt, 11/2% per month after 30 days, 18% annual percentage rate. Engineering, environmental and pavement consulting services. 319.00 339.25 _=========== BRAUN' • INTERTEC CLIENT: Stan Lexvcd11 City of Faq.-n 3833 Pi lot Knoh Road Eacan, MN 5517 1 • • Terminal r/Yankee Doodle Ra NW of 11 i hwav 1 3 Gtot chrtic-- t ry tuition C`,^alta, M ••-•y t,' `,'t.- T '' "r,,.,r /3../ _3 T%-i'u i C' PLEASE REMIT TO Braun Intertec Corporation SDS 12-0946 • P.O. Box 86 Minneapolis, Minnesota 55486-0946 (612)946-6000 • Fax(612)946-6001 INV. PATE : 1ZIIb/93 INV/1ICE : t)1(3075 PRt1Jt.:CT : 5CUX-93-.A. CI_Irdr V : E0i2ty5 CLIENT REF: Please pay from this Invoice and include remittance copy with payment. Terms: Due on receipt, 1Y2% per month after 30 days, 18% annual percentage rate. Engineering, environmental and pavement consufing services. May 9, 1995 CONSULTING ENGINEERS File: 112-000-00 1326 Energy Park Drive St. Paul, MN 55108 612-644-4389 1-800-888-2923 Fax: 612-644-9446 CIVIL ENGINEERING ENVIRONMENTAL ONICIPAL NNING SOLID WASTE STRUCTURAL SURVEYING TRAFFIC TRANSPORTATION ELECTRICAL/MECHANICAL ENGINEERING: HVAC POWER DISTRIBUTION SCADA SYSTEM CONTROLS FFICES IN: INNEAPOLIS PRIOR LAKE ST. PAUL WASECA Mr. Thomas Colbert Public Works Director City of Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55122 RE: PROJECT 661-661R SIBLEY TERMINAL INDUSTRIAL PARK, YANKEE DOODLE ROAD ENGINEERING INFORMATION SUMMARY Dear Tom: MSA has compiled a packet of information demonstrating the work which we have produced on this project during the past one and a half to two years. As discussed during our meeting on Monday, May 8, the following is a list of items which will be provided to the City Council Public Works Committee. Except as noted, MSA has provided copies of all items. Also as requested, we have completed summaries of the five different feasibility reports completed and summarized the 10-12 different assessment scenarios completed for the project. A list of the items provided is as follows: 1. Five Separate Project Feasibility Reports (summary enclosed, copies to be provided by City of Eagan staff). u. t 2. Assessment Rolls (summary of 10-12 different assessment scenarios provided along with copies of assessment rolls not included in individual feasibility reports). 3. Storm Sewer Design. 4. Preliminary Pavement Design. 5. Final Pavement Design. 6. Slide Show and Slide Script for Presentation (slides to be available at City Council meeting) . 7. Driveway Analysis Including Field Notes and Condition Summary 8. Project Construction Notice 9. Field Inspector's Diary. 10. Final Project Plans and Specifications (to be available at City Council meeting). 11. Preliminary Survey Notes (copy to be available at City Council meeting). 12. Invoices for MSA Billings (City to provide copies of all invoices). 112/000-0905.may • • • Mr. Thomas Colbert May 9, 1995 Page Two To the best of my recollection, this is a complete list of all major work elements completed as part of this project. In addition to these major work products, the project involved many meetings and considerable staff office and field time to complete these items. We believe our engineering fees are justified based upon the changed scope of the project and the work effort necessary to complete the items requested by the City of Eagan staff. If you have any further questions or need any of these items clarified, please let me know prior to the meeting on May 16th. Sincerely, MSA, CONSULT NGINEERS Ste en D. Gatlin, P.E. General Manager SDG:tw Attachment 112/000-0905.may I ONSGLTING MINERS 1326 Energy Park Drive St. Paul, MN 55108 o12-644-4389 1-800-888-2923 =ax: 612-644-9446 .SLVIL ENGINEERING ENVIRONMENTAL 'AUNICIPAL NG WASTE :TRUCTURAL SURVEYING TRAFFIC TRANSPORTATION ELECTRICAL/MECHANICAL ENGINEERING: .VAC ?OWER DISTRIBUTION :CADA SYSTEM CONTROLS OFFICES IN: •EAPOLIS PRIOR LAKE ST PAUL NASECA March 22, 1995 File: 112-005-58 Mr. Michael Foertsch, P.E. Assistant City Engineer City of Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55122 RECEIVED ,'IAR 2 3 1995 RE: BILLINGS FOR MSA ENGINEERING SERVICES Dear Mike: Yesterday we mailed to you billings for miscellaneous projects currently being worked on by MSA, Consulting Engineers. These bills are generally for the time period of late January to late February 1995. The exception to this is the group of billings for City projects 661 and 661-R, Sibley Terminal Industrial Park improvements and the Mill and Overlay project to Yankee Doodle Road. On March 9th, I sent you a letter of explanation regarding the bill and its status. In addition, during our recent meeting I provided you with an approximate breakdown of projects costs allocated to various subtasks within that project. The group of billings which we have sent for project 661 and 661-R includes work completed but not billed to Eagan generally during the time frame late January 1994 to September of 1994. When we met last week, I provided a corrected breakdown of cost information for the various project subtasks. Attached is a final cost breakdown with a total based on the billings we sent yesterday. Please note that these totals all match within a few cents of the numbers provided to you. Following is a summary of each of the project sub -components and the work completed for each task with general comments about the billing. 1. Project 661 (MSA project 112-005-20). This billing is for field surveying and design for the original Sibley Terminal project. The work included storm sewer design, preliminary pavement design, a detailed review of design elements including pavement condition, driveway condition analysis, development potential, etc. Work on this subtask was completed late January through mid-April of 1994, and was not billed due to the fact that the project status was unclear at that time. Project 661-R (MSA project 112-005-12). This task included revising the original feasibility report and completing numerous assessment scenarios for various financing alternatives. Also, this work included revised preliminary design based on the reduced scope of the project. Work under this task number was originally coded to the 661 project and was not billed to Eagan pending final decision on the project. Mr. Michael Foertsch, P.E. March 22, 1995 Page Two • 3. Project 661-R (MSA project 112-005-25). This task includes final design, specifications, preparation of final plans, and bidding for the project as finally ordered. This element contains field work by our crews, including inspectors, to determine the final pavement design and appropriate grading and cross section for the street. 4. Project 661-R (MSA project 112-005-40). This task represents field inspection and construction observation provided by our crew but not billed to Eagan generally during the period late July through mid-October. 5. Project 661-R (MSA project 112-005-58). This task includes preparation of the assessment roll, modifications to the roll, and attending any necessary neighborhood meetings and public hearings for final consideration of the assessment roll for project 661-R. You will note that we budgeted $1,500 for this work. The group of bills sent includes a billing in the amount of approximately $858. We anticipate the remaining $642 should be adequate to complete necessary tasks. This information provides a summary of billings for project 661/661-R. This final breakdown of costs hopefully will assist you and the Finance Department in properly • allocating costs to a future Terminal Area project and the present Yankee Doodle Road Mill and Overlay project. In addition to these billings, also sent were current billings for other projects for which services have been completed. We anticipate that billings for Wilderness Run and Dodd Road will be completed within the next 30 days based on final Council acceptance of these projects. Other projects will continue during 1995. If you have any questions regarding any of these billings, please contact me. Hopefully, this summary will allow you to understand the bills. If not, please call. Sincerely, MSA, CONSUL 0.0G ENGINEERS // 7 . Gatlin, P.E. General Manager SDG:tw Enclosures 112/005-2210.mar • • • Yankee Doodle Road Project Engineering Fee Summary PROJECT 661 $ 7,820.33 (MSA 112-005-10) 1,648.23 Preliminary Investigation, Feasibility Report, Preliminary 633.96 Surveys, Base Mapping 1,731.44 69 00 $11,902.96 PROJECT 661 $1,676.93 (MSA 112-005-20) * 5,300 53 Field Survey, Storm Sewer Design, Preliminary Design, $6,977.46 Detail Review (driveways, development, etc.) PROJECT 661-R $1,005. 74 (MSA 112-005-12) 1,457.12 Revised Report, Assessment Analysis, Revised Preliminary 2,049.48 Design *3,430.83 $7,943.17 PROJECT 661-R $1,674.51 (MSA 112-005-25) 62.33 Final Design, Specifications, Final Plans, Bidding * 931 70 $2,668.04 PROJECT 661-R $ 944.06 (MSA 112-005-40) 49.73 Construction Services 1,012.37 * 458 37 $2,464.48 PROJECT 661-R * 857.84 (MSA 112-005-58) * * 647 16 Assessment Roll, Hearing, Meetings $1,500.00 TOTAL $33,456.11 * Billed on March 21, 1995 **Not billed as of March 21, 1995 005-0902.mar • • • FEASIBILITY REPORT SUMMARY PROJECT 661-661R SIBLEY TERMINAL INDUSTRIAL PARK, YANKEE DOODLE ROAD, TERMINAL DRIVE IMPROVEMENTS The following is a brief summary of each of the five feasibility reports generated for this project. The reports were generated over a period of 18 months and include three major changes to the scope of the project. Individual reports are summarized as follows: JANUARY 1994 FEASIBILITY REPORT 1. Scope: Project goal was to upgrade the pavement condition of Yankee Doodle Road and Terminal Drive to a 10 -ton structural capacity by milling/overlay or reconstruction. Storm sewer capacity in low areas was to be increased by adding catch basins. Driveway conditions were to be improved and, where necessary, utility repairs made. 2. Project Elements: Project elements included the following: a. Reconstruct low point area of Yankee Doodle Road, milling and overlay remaining section of Yankee Doodle Road. b. Milling and overlay Terminal Drive. c. Replace all deteriorated curb. d. Add storm sewer including catch basins and leads at low points on both Terminal Drive and Yankee Doodle Road. e. Replace non-standard driveways to comply with commercial requirements. f. Project Cost: $484,000. g. Project Assessment: Front foot basis for both street and storm sewer modifications. h. Assessment Rate: $38.00/front foot - street, $17.00/front foot - storm sewer. MARCH 1994 FEASIBILITY REPORT 1. Scope: Project was similar in nature to the January 1994 report, except that storm sewer was eliminated from the low point on Terminal Road and additional drainage improvements were added to the intersection of Terminal Drive and TH 13. 2. Project Elements: a. Milling and overlay and reconstruction of low point on Yankee Doodle Road. b. Milling and overlay on Terminal Drive. c. Catch basin leads and new catch basins at low point on Yankee Doodle Road. d. For driveways, replace only bad driveways that had deteriorated and did not conform to City Standards. e. Storm sewer improvements including catch basins, curb and culvert replacement at TH 13/Terminal Drive intersection. f. Project Cost: $437,000. 112/000-0905.may • • • g. Project Assessment: Front foot basis including street improvements and storm sewer improvements, unit cost per driveway proposed to be assessed, assessed to all abutting frontage. h. Assessment Rate: $33.45/front foot. MAY 1994 FEASIBILITY REPORT 1. Scope: For this project, all work on Terminal Road was eliminated and the project included only work on Yankee Doodle Road. 2. Project Elements: a. Work on Yankee Doodle Road included reconstruction of the low point and milling and overlaying the remaining portion. b. Storm sewer was to be constructed in the sag point, including catch basins and leads. c. Specific driveway repairs and replacements were outlined based on condition and non-compliance with City code. d. Project Cost: Estimate of $196,000. e. Project Assessment: Front foot basis Yankee Doodle frontage only. f. Proposed Rate: $68.44/foot. JUNE 15, 1994 FEASIBILITY REPORT 1. Scope: This report considered the same improvement on Yankee Doodle Road as the one outlined in the May report. The significant difference was that the method of assessment was a change from a front foot basis to a combination front foot and area. For this report, many different assessment scenarios were examined prior to completing the report. 2. Project Elements: a. Same reconstruction scenario on Yankee Doodle Road as May report, including milling and overlaying and reconstructing low point. b. Spot repair of driveways as necessary based on condition. c. New curb and gutter, storm sewer, and catch basins in low point. d. Project Cost: $196,600. e. Project Assessment: Based on combination of front foot/area (50% front foot, 50% area). Front foot allocated to Yankee Doodle Road, area to entire benefitting area. f. Proposed Assessment Rate: $34.72 per front foot on Yankee Doodle Road. $429 per acre to property on Terminal Drive. JUNE 30, 1994 FEASIBILITY REPORT 1. Scope: This report was done as an addendum to the June 15, 1994, report and included a scenario for repair work on Yankee Doodle Road as suggested by the property owners. The project included only patching, milling, and overlaying of failed sections in Yankee Doodle Road and no additional improvements other than pavement repair. 112/000-0905.may • 2. Project Elements: a. Pavement improvements on Yankee Doodle Road including patching, milling, and overlaying. b. No curb replacement, no storm sewer, no utility repair, or no driveway repair. c. Project Cost: $67,600 d. Project Assessment: $17.44 per foot (based on 50% cost allocated to Yankee Doodle frontage abutting improvement), $215 per acre (50% of project cost allocated on area basis to entire Sibley Terminal area except Yankee Doodle frontage). e. Project included economic analysis of life cycle costing of both the reconstruction and milling/overlaying alternate examined in the June 15th report, and the patch and repair alternate examined in the June 30th report. • • 112/000-09O5.may • ASSESSMENT ANALYSIS SUMMARY PROJECT 661-661R SIBLEY TERMINAL, YANKEE DOODLE ROAD AREA INTRODUCTION For the project involving work in the Sibley Terminal industrial area, MSA developed 10-12 different assessment scenarios over the 18 -month period of time that the feasibility reports were analyzed. For the first three reports completed in January, March, and May of 1994, all assessments were proposed to be levied against benefitting property on a front foot basis. When the original project was contemplated to include work on Yankee Doodle Road and Terminal Road, all properties were proposed to be assessed uniformly. When the scope of the project was reduced to work on Yankee Doodle Road only, the May report included assessments only against benefitting property on Yankee Doodle Road. Later discussion by the City Council considered alternate assessment methods of allocating the costs both on a benefitting front foot basis and a benefitting area basis, with the rationale being that all properties in the area benefitted by improvements to Yankee Doodle Road and therefore should pay a portion of the cost. The following is a brief summary of the assessment methodology used for this project. Also attached as part of the informational material is a May 27, 1994, memo summarizing the assessment methodology used. The May 27th memo analyzes four different assessment scenarios. These included the following, with a brief description of each: 1. Original Project as Outlined in January and March Feasibility Reports. All project costs under this scenario would have been assessed uniformly on a front foot basis to all property on Yankee Doodle Road and on Terminal Drive. 2. Revised Project as Outlined in May Feasibility Report. This project included improving Yankee Doodle Road only and spreading all assessable costs equally on a front foot basis against adjacent frontage on Yankee Doodle Road only. 3. This project included work on Yankee Doodle Road as described in the May feasibility report, but a different assessment methodology. Fifty percent of the cost would be spread equally on a front footage basis against adjacent frontage on Yankee Doodle, and the remaining 50% spread equally on a front foot basis to all property that could use Yankee Doodle Road and TH 13. 4. Under this scenario, the work on Yankee Doodle Road was proposed to include reconstruction as described in the May report, but all costs were proposed to be spread 100% equally on a front footage basis against all properties that could use Yankee Doodle Road, including Terminal Drive, Yankee Drive, and Yankee Doodle Road. 112/000-0905.may This list resulted in four different combinations of front footage assessment scenarios as shown 10 and summarized in the May 27th memo. • Following this action, the City Council discussed in late May and early June alternate assessments rather than a front foot basis for non -abutting benefit. The City Council considered an area basis to a part of the project cost. Assessment scenarios labeled #5 and #6 included area calculations made to allocate a portion of the project cost. Copies of rough drafts of those assessment rolls are also enclosed. These used project costs contained in the May and June 15th feasibility reports. Finally, a combination area and front foot assessment roll was created for the June 30th feasibility report that allocated the costs for the proposed mill and overlay project on an equal basis, 50% area against non -abutting property, and 50% front foot against the abutting properties. 112/000-0905.may CIVIL ENGINEERING: ENVIRONMENTAL MUNICIPAL ':=NNiNG RJCT RAL •REYNG -;,:NS-ORTA-;ON 1326 Energy Park Drive St. Paul, MN 55108 612-644-4389 Fax 612-644-9446 ®00 Sheard Parkway Minneapolis, MN 55441 612-546-0432 fax 612-544-6398 MEMORANDUM TO: Eagan Public Works Staff and City Council rt;‘' FROM: Steve Gatlin, P.E. SUBJECT: Sibley Terminal Industrial Park Area FILE: 112-005-10 DATE: May 27, 1994 INTRODUCTION Our firm has been asked to review the proposed street improvements and potential assessments for work within the Sibley Terminal Industrial Park area. The City Council recently held a public hearing to consider this project, and at that time cancelled the improvement. Since that date, Eagan City staff has contacted our firm and asked us to evaluate the original project, the revised project, and several different assessment scenarios. The results of our assessment investigation are summarized on the attached table. Also, a map of the proposed project area is included for your review. DISCUSSION For our analysis, we have considered both the original project and the amended project. These were analyzed in detail and feasibility reports prepared by our firm and presented to the City in March and May respectively. The original project included street improvements to Terminal Drive from TH 13 to Yankee Doodle Road and Yankee Doodle Road from Terminal Drive to TH 13. Work included milling and overlaying on Terminal Drive and a combination of milling and overlaying, pavement reconstruction, and storm sewer installation on Yankee Doodle Road. The revised project included no work on Terminal Drive and involved the work on Yankee Doodle Road as described in the original report. Again, this project included reconstruction and overlaying sections of Yankee Doodle Road from Terminal Drive to TH 13 and the installation of storm sewer in the low area near Yankee Drive. 1121005-2511.may • • • Table 2. Summary of Assessment Rates Assessment Method Assessment Rate 1. Original Project $33.45 2. Revised Project $69.44 3. a. 50% Abutting $34.72 b. 50% Uniform (All Remaining) $6.00 4. Uniform (All Properties) $10.22 SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS As pointed out in the earlier feasibility reports, both the original project and the amended project are feasible from an engineering standpoint. The City of Eagan working with its financial advisors and City attorney need to make a determination regarding the economic feasibility of each of the possible assessment methods for the two projects. Based on our experience, we would note that assessment model #1 is reasonable in that it provides a uniform assessment for a similar type of improvement against all abutting affected property owners. Assessment method #2 provides an assessment against abutting properties who immediately have frontage on Yankee Doodle Road. This assessment method does not attempt to allocate any costs on an "area" basis to other properties who use Yankee Doodle Road on a regular basis. Typical assessments for commercial roadway reconstruction in other areas of the metropolitan Twin Cities indicate assessment rates in the range of $50 to $75. The proposed amount in method #2 of slightly under $70 is reasonable for this type of improvement, although it is on the high end of the range. Assessment method #3 allocates costs both on an abutting and area basis. This method appears equitable in that costs are paid both by properties who have direct frontage and an immediate benefit, and also by properties who take advantage of the improved Yankee Doodle Road access even though they may not have abutting frontage. Assessment scenario #4 apportions the costs equally among all abutting property owners. Property owners not fronting Yankee Doodle Road may be able to successfully argue that they do not have a benefit as high as property owners directly abutting the improvement. Also, they could argue that the uniform assessment rate does not provide uniform level of improvement for all affected property owners. Therefore, it is our opinion that this assessment scenario is not the most equitable of the four and is probably the least desirable. SDG:tw 1121005-2511.may • • • The following table summarizes the original project cost, assessments, and City cost sharing. Table 1. Project Cost Summary Assessable Prnjt Total Cost Amount City Cost Original $379,000 $306,500 $72,500 (Yankee Doodle/Terminal) Amended (Yankee Doodle) 196,600 134,600 62,000 We have also been asked to analyze four assessment scenarios. These are detailed as follows with a brief description of each assessment method. 1. Origjnal Project. This assessment would include a uniform assessment against all properties benefitting from the original project, including all properties on Yankee Doodle Road and Terminal Drive abutting the improvement. 2. Revised Pmjert• This scenario involves improvements to Yankee Doodle Road only with assessments levied equally on a front foot basis against only abutting property. Assessments would be charged against only those properties having frontage on Yankee Doodle Road from Terminal Drive to TH 13. 3. This scenario includes improvements only to Yankee Doodle Road. Under this assessment model, the assessable costs would be spread 50% equally on a front foot basis against all properties having abutting frontage and the remaining 50% would be equally levied on a front foot basis to all properties that could potentially use the Yankee Doodle Road/TH 13 entrance. These properties would include all properties on Yankee Doodle Road from TH 13 to the west deadend, on Yankee Drive from Yankee Doodle Road to TH 13, and on Terminal Drive from Yankee Doodle Road to TH 13. 4. This scenario includes improvements to Yankee Doodle Drive only and the assessable costs would be spread on a 100% basis uniformly on a front foot basis against all properties that could use the Yankee Doodle Road/TH 13 entrance. This would include all assessable frontage on Yankee Doodle Road, Yankee Drive, and Terminal Drive within the project area. The following is a summary of assessment rates against affected properties for the various scenarios. 112/005-2511.may Revised May 27, 1994 ' ASSESSMENT METHOD #1 March 1994 Feasibility Report Project 661 NOTE: Assessment calculations for Method #1 uses footage in Columns 3 and 4. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Legal Property Frontage- Frontage Frontage Street Driveway Total Assess. Descr. ID No. Terminal - Yankee - Yankee Assess. Assess. Drive Doodle Drive @ @ Road and 33.45/ 2,042.00 East of Yankee FF EA Terminal Doodle Drive Road West of Terminal Drive Block 1, Lot 1 10-68050-010-01 256.07 0 0 8,565.54 2,042.00 10,607.54 Block 1, Lot 2 10-68050-020-01 200.00 0 0 6,690.00 6,690.00 Block 1, Lot 3 10-68050-031-01 271.97 0 0 9,097.40 9,097.40 10-68050-032-01 Block 1, Lot 4 10-68050-041-01 255.00 0 0 8,529.75 8,529.75 10-68050-042-01 Block 1, Lot 5 10-68050-050-01 286.63 0 0 12,263.77 12,263.77 10-68050-062-01 80.00 Block 1, Lot 6 10-68050-061-01 447.07 0 0 14,954.49 4,084.00 19,038.49 Block 1, Lot 7 10-68050-070-01 343.44 0 0 11,488.07 4,084.00 15,572.07 Block 1, Lot 8 10-68050-080-01 315.33 0 0 10,547.78 2,042.00 12,589.78 Block 1, Lot 9 10-68050-090-01 304.68 0 0 10,191.55 10,191.55 Block 1, Lot 10 10-68050-100-01 270.00 0 0 9,031.50 9,031.50 Block 1, Lot 11 Parcel A 0 0 284.65 0 0 0 Parcel B 281.48 0 271.91 9,415.50 2,042.00 11,457.50 Block 2, Lot 1 10-68050-011-02 250.00 0 0 24,440.91 24,440.91 10-68050-010-02 480.67 Block 2, Lott 10-68050-020-02 348.57 0 0 11,659.66 11,659.66 Block 2, Lot 3 10-68050-030-02 260.88 0 0 8,726.44 4,084.00 12,810.44 10-68050-031-02 ' 10-68050-032-02 10-68050-033-02 Block 2, Lot 4 10-68050-040-02 280.00 0 0 9,366.00 112/005-2513.may Revised May 27, 1994 iASSESSMENT METHOD #1 March 1994 Feasibility Report Project 661 NOTE: Assessment calculations for Method #1 uses footage in Columns 3 and 4. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Block 2, Lot 5 10-68050-050-02 265.00 0 0 8,864.25 8,864.25 Block 2, Lot 6 10-68050-060-02 225.51 0 0 7,543.30 7,543.30 Block 2, Lot 7 10-68050-070-02 316.71 0 0 10,593.74 2,042.00 12,635.94 Block 2, Lot 8 10-68050-081-02 10-68050-082-02 390.20 0 0 13,052.19 13,052.19 Block 2, Lot 9 363.20 296.02 22,050.90 22,050.90 Best Brands; Lot 1, Block 1 0 363.64 12,163.75 4,084.00 16,247.75 Government Lot 6 SE 1/4 Section 8 011-76 0 161.00 0 5,385.45 5,385.45 Government 1 Lot 6 SE 1/4 Section 8 020-76 0 297.63 0 9,955.72 9,955.72 R.L.Johnson 2nd Addition 10-39901-010-01 0 640.13 1,925.58 21,412.35 21,412.35 Comsery No. One (Partial) 10-18200-011-01 0 180.00 569.37 6,021.00 6,021.00 Mardelann Oudot B 10-47285-020-00 0 0 434.10 0 0 Comsery No. One (Partial) 10-18200-012-01 0 0 905.70 0 0 Comsery No. One (Partial) 10-18200-013-01 0 0 279.00 0 0 Valley Acres 10-81180-010-01 0 0 66.00 0 0 TOTAL FRONTAGE 6,492.44 1,938.42 4,736.31 ASSESSMENT RECOVERY 282,011.21 24,504.00 306,515.21 • 112/005-2513.may Revised May 27, 1994 1 ASSESSMENT METHOD #2 May 1994 Feasibility Report Project 661R NOTE: Assessment calculations for Method #2 uses footage in Column 4. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 + Legal Property Frontage- Frontage Frontage Street Driveway Total Assess. Descr. ID No. Terminal - Yankee - Yankee Assess. Assess. Drive Doodle Road Drive and 69.44/ 2,042.00 East of Yankee FF EA Terminal Doodle Drive Road West of Terminal Drive Block 1, Lot 1 10-68050-010-01 256.07 0 0 0 0 0 Block 1, Lot 2 10-68050-020-01 200.00 0 0 0 0 0 Block 1, Lot 3 10-68050-031-01 271.97 0 0 0 0 0 10-68050-032-01 - ' Block 1, Lot 4 10-68050-041-01 255.00 0 0 0 0 0 10-68050-042-01 Block 1, Lot 5 10-68050-050-01 286.63 0 0 0 0 0 10-68050-062-01 80.00 Block 1, Lot 6 10-68050-061-01 447.07 0 0 0 0 0 Block 1, Lot 7 10-68050-070-01 343.44 0 0 0 0 0 Block 1, Lot 8 10-68050-080-01 315.33 0 0 0 0 0 Block 1, Lot 9 10-68050-090-01 304.68 0 0 0 0 0 Block 1, Lot 10 10-68050-100-01 270.00 0 0 0 0 0 Block 1, Lot 11 Parcel A 0 0 284.65 0 0 0 Parcel B 281.48 0 271.91 0 0 0 Block 2, Lot 1 10-68050-011-02 250.00 0 0 0 0 0 10-68050-010-02 480.67 Block 2, Lot 2 10-68050-020-02 348.57 0 0 0 0 0 Block 2, Lot 3 10-68050-030-02 260.88 0 0 0 0 0 10-68050-031-02 ' 10-68050-032-02 10-68050-033-02 Block 2, Lot 4 10-68050-040-02 280.00 0 0 0 0 0 112/005-2514.may Revised May 27, 1994 ASSESSMENT METHOD #2 May 1994 Feasibility Report Project 661R NOTE: Assessment calculations for Method #2 uses footage in Column 4. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Block 2, Lot 5 10-68050-050-02 265.00 0 0 0 0 0 Block 2, Lot 6 10-68050-060-02 225.51 0 0 0 0 0 Block 2, Lot 7 10-68050-070-02 316.71 0 0 0 0 0 Block 2, Lot 8 10-68050-081-02 10-68050-082-02 390.20 0 0 0 0 0 Block 2, Lot 9 363.20 296.02 20,556.04 20,556.04 Best Brands; Lot 1, Block 1 0 363.64 25,250.43 4,084.00 29,334.43 Government Lot 6 SE 1/4 Section 8 011-76 0 161.00 0 11,179.52 11,179.52 Government Lot 6 SE 1/4 Section 8 020-76 0 297.63 0 20,666.83 20,666.83 R.L.Johnson 2nd Addition 10-39901-010-01 0 640.13 1,925.58 44,449.35 44,449.35 Comsery No. One (Partial) 10-18200-011-01 0 180.00 569.37 12,498.83 12,498.83 Mardelann Outlot B 10-47285-020-00 0 0 434.10 0 0 Comsery No. One (Partial) 10-18200-012-01 0 0 905.70 0 0 Comsery No. One (Partial) 10-18200-013-01 0 0 279.00 0 0 Valley Acres 10-81180-010-01 0 0 66.00 0 0 TOTAL FRONTAGE 6,492.44 1,938.42 4,736.31 ASSESSMENT RECOVERY 134,600.00 4,084.00 138,684.00 • 1121005-2514.may Revised May 27, 1994 IP ASSESSMENT METHOD #3 Project 661R NOTE: Assessment calculations for Method #3 uses footages in Column 4 to calculate Column 6 and footages in Columns 3 and 5 to calculate Column 8. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Legal Descr. Property ID No. Frontage - Terminal Drive Frontage - Yankee Doodle Road East of Terminal Drive Frontage - Yankee Drive and Yankee Doodle Road West of Terminal Drive Street Assess. 0 34.72/ FF Driveway Assess. @ 2,042.00 EA Street Assess. Area Benefit @ 6.00/ FF Total Assess. Block 1, Lot 1 10-68050-010-01 256.07 0 0 0 0 1,536.42 1,536.42 Block 1, Lot 2 10-68050-020-01 200.00 0 0 0 0 1,200.00 1,200.00 Block 1, Lot 3 10-68050-031-01 10-68050-032-01 271.97 0 0 0 0 1,631.46 1,631.46 Block 1, Lot 4 • 10-68050-041-01 10-68050-042-01 255.00 0 0 0 0 1,530.00 1,530.00 Block 1, Lot 5 10-68050-050-01 10-68050-062-01 286.63 80.00 0 0 0 0 1,719.78 480.00 1,719.78 480.00 Block 1, Lot 6 10-68050-061-01 447.07 0 0 0 0 2,682.48 2,682.48 Block 1, Lot 7 10-68050-070-01 343.44 0 0 0 0 2,060.64 2,060.64 Block 1, Lot 8 10-68050-080-01 315.33 0 0 0 0 1,891.98 1,891.98 Block 1, Lot 9 10-68050-090-01 304.68 0 0 0 0 1,828.08 1,828.08 Block 1, Lot 10 10-68050-100-01 270.00 0 0 0 0 1,620.00 1,620.00 Block 1, Lot 11 Parcel A Parcel B 0 281.48 0 0 284.65 271.91 0 0 0 0 1,707.90 3,320.34 1,707.90 3,320.34 Block 2, Lot 1 10-68050-011-02 10-68050-010-02 250.00 480.67 0 0 0 0 1,500.00 2,884.02 1,500.00 2,884.02 Block 2, Lot 2 10-68050-020-02 348.57 0 0 0 0 2,091.42 2,091.42 Block 2, Lot 3 10-68050-030-02 10-68050-031-02 10-68050-032-02 10-68050-033-02 260.88 0 0 0 0 1,565.28 1,565.28 itk 2, Lot 4 10-68050-040-02 280.00 0 0 0 0 1 680.00 1 68 0.00 Block 2, Lot 5 10-68050-050-02 265.00 0 0 0 0 1,590.00 1,590.00 1121005-2515.may Revised May 27, 1994 IP ASSESSMENT METHOD #3 Project 661R NOTE: Assessment calculations for Method #3 uses footages in Column 4 to calculate Column 6 and footages in Columns 3 and 5 to calculate Column 8. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Block 2, Lot 6 10-68050-060-02 225.51 0 0 0 0 1,353.06 1,353.06 Block 2, Lot 7 10-68050-070-02 316.71 0 0 0 0 1,900.26 1,900.26 Block 2, Lot 8 10-68050-081-02 10-68050-082-02 390.20 0 0 0 0 2,341.20 2,341.20 Block 2, Lot 9 363.20 296.02 0 10,277.81 0 2,179.00 12,457.01 Best Brands; Lot 1, Block 1 0 363.64 0 12,625.58 _ 4,084.00 0 16,709.58! Government Lot 6 SE 1/4 Section 8 011-76 0 161.00 0 5,589.92 0 0 5,589.92 Government Lot 6 SE 1/4 Section 8 020-76 0 297.63 0 10,333.71 0 0 10,333.71 •.Johnson 1 Addition nd Addition 10-39901-010-01 0 640.13 1925.58 22,225.31 0 11,553.48 33,778.79 Comsery No. One (Partial) 10-18200-011-01 0 180.00 569.37 6,249.60 0 3,416.22 9,665.82 Mardelann Outlot B 10-47285-020-00 0 0 434.10 0 0 2,604.60 2,604.60 Comsery No. One (Partial) 10-18200-012-01 0 0 905.70 0 0 5,434.20 5,434.20 Comsery No. One (Partial) 10-18200-013-01 0 0 279.00 0 0 1,674.00 1,674.00 Valley Acres 10-81180-010-01 0 0 66.00 0 0 396.00 396.00 TOTAL FRONTAGE 6492.44 1938.42 4736.31 ASSESSMENT RECOVERY 67,301.93 4084.00 67,372.02 138,757.95 • 112/005-25 1 5.may Revised May 27, 1994 ASSESSMENT METHOD #4 Project 661R NOTE: Assessment calculations for Method #4 uses footage in Columns 3, 4, and 5 to calculate Column 6. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Legal Property Frontage- Frontage Frontage Street Driveway Total Assess. Descr. ID No. Terminal - Yankee - Yankee Assess. Assess. Drive Doodle Drive C Road and 10.22/ 2,042.00 East of Yankee FF EA Terminal Doodle Drive Road West of Terminal Drive Block 1, Lot 1 10-68050-010-01 256.07 0 0 2,617.04 0 2,617.04 Block 1, Lot 2 10-68050-020-01 200.00 0 0 2,044.00 0 2,044.00 Block 1, Lot 3 10-68050-031-01 271.97 0 0 2,779.53 0 2,779.53 10-68050-032-01 ',Block 1, Lot 4 10-68050-041-01 255.00 0 0 2,606.10 0 2,606.10 10-68050-042-01 Block 1, Lot 5 10-68050-050-01 286.63 0 0 2,929.36 0 2,929.36 10-68050-062-01 80.00 817.60 817.60 Block 1, Lot 6 10-68050-061-01 447.07 0 0 4,569.05 0 4,569.05 Block 1, Lot 7 10-68050-070-01 343.44 0 0 3,509.96 0 3,509.96 Block 1, Lot 8 10-68050-080-01 315.33 0 0 3,222.67 0 3,222.67 Block 1, Lot 9 10-68050-090-01 304.68 0 0 3,113.83 0 3,113.83 Block 1, Lot 10 10-68050-100-01 270.00 0 0 2,759.40 0 2,759.40 Block 1, Lot 11 Parcel A 0 0 284.65 2,909.12 0 2,909.12 Parcel B 281.48 0 271.91 5,655.65 0 5,655.65 Block 2, Lot 1 10-68050-011-02 250.00 0 0 2,555.00 0 2,555.00 10-68050-010-02 480.67 4,912.45 4,912.45 Block 2, Lott 10-68050-020-02 348.57 0 0 3,562.38 0 3,562.38 Block 2, Lot 3 10-68050-030-02 260.88 0 0 2,666.19 0 2,666.19 10-68050-031-02 10-68050-032-02 10-68050-033-02 Block 2, Lot 4 10-68050-040-02 280.00 0 0 2,861.60 0 2,861.60 112/005-2516.may Revised May 27, 1994 P ASSESSMENT METHOD #4 Project 661R NOTE: Assessment calculations for Method #4 uses footage in Columns 3, 4, and 5 to calculate Column 6. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Block 2, Lot 5 10-68050-050-02 265.00 0 0 2,708.30 0 2,708.30 Block 2, Lot 6 10-68050-060-02 225.51 0 0 2,304.71 0 2,304.71 Block 2, Lot 7 10-68050-070-02 316.71 0 0 3,236.77 0 3,236.77 Block 2, Lot 8 10-68050-081-02 10-68050-082-02 390.20 0 0 3,988.05 0 3,988.05 Block 2, Lot 9 363.20 296.02 6,737.23 6,737.23 Best Brands; Lot 1, Block 1 0 363.64 3,716.40 4,084.00 7,800.40 Government Lot 6 SE 1/4 Section 8 011-76 0 161.00 0 1,645.42 1,645.42 Government ' Lot 6 SE 1/4 Section 8 020-76 0 297.63 0 3,041.78 3,041.78 R.L.Johnson 2nd Addition 10-39901-010-01 0 640.13 1,925.58 26,221.56 26,221.56 Consery No. One (Partial) 10-18200-011-01 0 180.00 569.37 7,658.56 7,658.56 Mardelann Outlot B 10-47285-020-00 0 0 434.10 4,436.50 4,436.50 Consery No. One (Partial) 10-18200-012-01 0 0 905.70 9,256.25 9,256.25 Consery No. One (Partial) 10-18200-013-01 0 0 279.00 2,851.38 2,851.38 Valley Acres 10-81180-010-01 0 0 66.00 674.52 674.52 TOTAL FRONTAGE 6,492.44 1,938.42 4,736.31 ASSESSMENT RECOVERY 134,568.36 4,084.00 138,652.36 • 112/005-25 16.roay 'OISI'LTING ENGINEERS ENGiNEE.RING: _ .;!RON IENTAL 1326 Energy Park Drive St. Paul, MN 55108 612-644-4389 Fax: 612-644-9446 Okelard Parkway polis, MN 55441 612-546-0432 Fax: 612-544-6398 le /12_cfc MEMORANDUM TO: Tom Colbert, City of Eagan FROM: Bruce Irish, MSA RE: Terminal Drive: Assessment Method #5 - Project 661R DATE: June 2, 1994 Attached is a preliminary assessment roll for assessment method #5. Costs for Terminal Drive work is directly assessed to abutting property. Fifty percent of Yankee Doodle Road work is assessed to abutting property. The other fifty percent of Yankee Doodle Road costs are distributed to all other property within the assessment area (i.e., Yankee Doodle Drive, Yankee Doodle Road west of Terminal Drive, and Terminal Drive). BI:tw Attachment 005-0302.jun • Revised June 2, 1994 ASSESSMENT METHOD //5 Project 661R NOTE: Assessment calculations for Method 114 uses footage in Column 3 to calculate Column 6, Column 4 to calculate Column 7, and Column 5 to calculate Column 8. 0 O ti ON 01 M O; oO t- h 7,805.54 7,318.50 N 8 N * N N oo N D\ :t -i ON NO N ? ON M 'p~� O .-+ 8,744.32 I 8 0' N t� Q\ p >+ O 0 0aQ� N W A 8 e� O N O0 0 0 4,084.00 4,084.00 8 e} o. N Oa .. 00 • w .� ® 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 t-- M N 1-§ g@ A Q• \ + Q PJ 0 N o 0 v O o- 0 if; o �O 0 00 o 0 1V M 44 `h s' .o 0 1- 4.-IPb r, 0 ›.M g.)y r .- O L F- N N N 9. O t^ to :S. o t- h M •O� N N co N 00 N ... O+ ON 8,7442 1 8 t` r to 1 ••� c - `a n .� + O c, t. 0 N t.. taa 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N l) ) ++ C1 CA N , "0 O > 0 O O O O O O 0 0 0 M , q F Ou N N N N d 343.4 M `-1 ~ M 304(68 27000 N ¢,z x_ 4:: A 10-68050-010-01 1 10-68050-020-01 10-68050-031-01 10-68050-032-01 10-68050-041-01 10-68050-042-01 10-68050-050-01 10-68050-062-01 10-68050-061-01 rt - o 00 Vi) 11M 10-68050-080-01 000 10-68050-100-01 A Block 1, Lot 1 Block 1, Lot 2 .4r v 0 0 f Block 1, Lot 4 Block 1, Lot 5 Block 1, Lot 6 Block 1, Lot 7 Block 1, Lot 8 1 Block 1, Lot 9 Block 1, Lot 10 1 12/005-0301.jun y ,:r ASSESSMENT METHOD #5 Project 661R NOTE: Assessment calculations for Method //4 uses footage in Column 3 to calculate Column 6, Column 4 to calculate Column 7, and Column 5 to calculate Column 8. O — 1,707.90 11,751.94 7,175.00 13,795.23 * M 8 O r.. N •-1 Vim') .- .-. S \O O 00 1pr; \D r tV 4 vs h.t. .i in .-i .-. OO - —7 ..-. l ....•O� O O N 00 vs ---+ O1 h v. O8 N O O 8 OG �' 0 O 0 2,042.00 0 O O O 00 1,707.90 1,631.46 O 0 O O O 0 O O O 0 O N 0/t18 iz 01rc'SZ11 t ►.\ re00 •, Go Dv O p., a 0 ° a h M 0 4- �0 O Or NI •% 0 - ` O NI N9 O v 0 0 O — �- l N O t000 tel N VD N g 00 vi .D 0 4. O 00 8 N t- N N M C 8 O N 4 t� pO O 00 O S t� .1-4 .D hg O O\ ON —i 10,423.84 O 0 v') 284.65 271.91 0 O O O O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 St N et en O M 0 281.48 250.00 480.67 348.57 260.88 280.00 S N try N N t� ;E:O\ M pN M 0 0 M 0 0 t'` t Parcel A Parcel B 10-68050-011-02 10-68050-010-02 N 4 OO O O 00 O 10-68050-030-02 10-68050-031-02 10-68050-032-02 10-68050-033-02 N 4 0 O 00 O N 4 O O O O 00 N 4 Q 0 O XO000 10-68050-070-02 10-6800-081-02 10-68050-082-02 SE 1/4 Section 8 011-76 Block 1, Lot 11 Block 2, Lot 1 IBlock 2, Lot 2 Block 2, Lot 3 Block 2, Lot 4 [Block 2, Lot 5 Block 2, Lot 6 Block 2, Lot 7 Block 2, Lot 8 IBlock 2, Lot 9 1 Best Brands; . Lot 1, Block 1 Government Lot 6 2/005-0301 .jun ASSESSMENT METHOD #5 Project 661R NOTE: Assessment calculations for Method #4 uses footage in Column 3 to calculate Column 6, Column 4 to calculate Column 7, and Column 5 to calculate Column 8. O .-r N M O r- (M 00000 Oi �D N N et V'1 O N r . �8 M h vi 1,j 8 M CN O O 0 O 0 0 0 eO 00 N 00 O 11,553.48 3,416.22 N 5,434.20 8 r- ---- 396.00 1 00 00 N I M M N O M V'1 N 0 Cn N 0 0 O 0 M 0\ .r O M O 0 0 0 0 0 0 —I M M V 00 tr) O 1,925.58 569.37 O en �O 0 8 r•-• O ' M r- '.t .1- 297.63 en OC -I- 8 00 O O O O 1,938.42 M O O O O O O O 6,492.44 N SE 1/4 Section 8 020-76 O d_ O O 0' 0. M d 10-18200-011-01 10-47285-020-00 10-18200-012-01 10-18200-013-01 10-81180-010-01 ITOTAL FRONTAGE ASSESSMENT RECOVERY Government Lot 6 R.L.Johnson 2nd Addition Comsery No. One (Partial) Mardelann Outlot B Comsery No. One (Partial) Comsery No. One (Partial) Valley Acres 112/005-0301.jun QIqt9L Revised M -1994 • ASSESSMENTETHOD 4 <v Project 1R (0 3 5 paire4-ii Areal '{ NOTE: Assessment calculations for Method #11 uses footages in • olumn 1 to calculate Column ! and in Columns $ - * to calculate Colunm a. 7 1 2 03 04 65 �Of ®'7 08 Legal Descr. Property ID No. F onta - ermi . • I Dri - Frontage - Yankee Doodle Road East of Terminal - �•,•1 e - i D > e. d / P . e Street Assess. a 34.72/ FF Driveway Assess. @ 2,042.00 EA /,Total <1.:•. 4 1 Area Benefit a Assess. Drive R.,:4- ' est of ,-I' .1 's D 17 t 673/70 / cc6 �; 1 Goo .7, . 23o Block 1, Lot 1 10-68050-010-01 • . $ 0 - 0 0 0 _��D 2 -1,536_42 Block 1, Lot 2 10-68050-020-01 212.00 0 -' Z x-95 p 0 Iq 5 • vb l 95 Block 1, Lot 3 10-68050-031-01 '7 0 AtrAirphe 0 0 4-434-.-46 '. 4-,631. 10-68050-032-01 2 ,i 9 5 /W '17• vi 14712' / ock 1, Lot 4 10-68050-041-01 /755.00 0 j 3 0 0-1.,.530,A0 3 @Q' 10-68050 042-01 �--� 3.001 2011.v" 2.0194' Block 1, Lot 5 10-68050-050-01 286.63 0 .a"+h$ 0 2.508 p p C1 7i9 7 1 $j7 10-68050-062-01 8. 0.00 4. LiZo „: tor 4' Block 1, Lot 6 10-68050-061-01 447.07 0 --x-Vslir • 1,'7Q6 0 0 X82 IFS 471• Block 1, Lot 7 10-68050-070-01 ,343.44 0 -274:4° 1.3,133 p p z4464 25;1464_ Block 1, Lot 8 10-68050-080-01 31, 3 0 2 4 2.4‘1 0 ' 770 ; 7 a? 1 •$5 . r 0 Block 1, Lot 9 10-68050-090-01 3 0 z -w 2.50$ 0 0 /� 1,1$ �.,5�8-�5 1 b� 28.8 -1;828.08 Block 1, Lot 10 10-68050-100-01 27 .00 0 4 2,105 0 0 ii `� Block 1, Lot 11 Parcel A `..--70�'0 0 1.137 0 0 S. �' Parcel B 28,Y.48 0 0 49=x3 0 0 646, . / 66,e:2:- 6,eZ`Block „ „�7,� .91 Block2, Lot 1 10-68050-011-02 2 i. i i 0 1+*1c- a 1.123 p p y. ,., 7 5 74 10-68050-010-02 481 .7 4--a-p.•3 1.27/ ' g55;3 Block 2, Lot 2 10-68050-020-02 8. 0 4.2.3 71 0 0 1.152 �� 7'-_ , 1 Block 2, Lot 3 10-68050-030-02 2 .88 0 /*AZ /'AZ4 1.952 0 0 1,565: , , 56-5771-8- 10-66800552-0 3/37% 1313.'7 10-68050-033-02 93 ,k2, / `��2 /'/ 2� Lot 4 10-68050-040-02 4 a ! + 0 $ 2,173 0 0 1-,-684.-0017680790 Biock 2, Lot 5 10-68050-050-02 2.•• .00 0 42,_...,24#40 2,2.-58 0 0 }590709 -11-590-4319-1 .63 /57.x_ 112/005-2515.may ,,kA4LQ 1141 1 c Revised 4 IIII ASSESSMENT METHOD #1 Co Project 661R ,�,� G,�P.If 6 3 S tom' �""" 4 NOTE: Assessment calculations for Method #1 uses footages in Column / to calculate Column. and fctos in Column4 % a el.to calculate Column*. 7 1 2 to 3 ri41 6 x a 49-8 Block 2, Lot 6 10-68050-060-02 9.51 0 2.ifis 0 03553:06... /t1 135106 �. $ Block 2, Lot 7 10-68050-070-02 • 71 0 It I, Rh 0 0 / 1,900. 6 11.Xr' tt 1 , Block 2, Lot 8 10-68050-081-02 10-68050-082-02 ' 1.20 of 0 2 •�3 0 d--$ 0 Pct 0 Q73+1720 i(0411.1 -1q -2?44-.?0 16141.((4 Block 2, Lot 9 36 .20 296.02 b 10,277.81 0 039 .:1,A. __.7 00•`o it z(� 3Gs Best Brands; Lot 1, Block 1 0 363.64 1, 3�-6 b 11832, 12,625.58 4,084.00 / 2.3Z141 16749-A:, 789 38 17 749A Government Lot 6 SE 1/4 Section 8 011-76 0 161.00 -9' $&, 99 5,589.92 0 -1:r5,589.92 35,22- 915(0 .15 Government Lot 6 SE 1/4 Section 8 020-76 0 297.63 • D .817 10,333.71 0 9 511'3. T'`t l0 g •.Johnson Addition 10-39901-010-01 0 640.1322,225.31 3418 ( /0.78s 0 -13538 7258.30 33,778.79 Z)-1, g3. C2 Comsery No. One fftlitier 10-18200-011-01 0 180.00 ',69-37 f 6,249.60 If. 87( 0 -374+67-22 .A 14 252: .a Mardelann Outlot B_rifrre9. 10-47285-020-00 0 0 7. Z22. 0 Illteerl 0 x7604:60 Le 86 p •/ 1 i;604'T17' 4-•. 434. t9 Comsery No. One (Partial) 10-18200-012-01 0 0 _9%T% 7. 3 $ ( 0 0 5,431.20 2) i(9 67. Li 47 %la'7 .`ii Comsery No. One (Partial) 10-18200-013-01 0 0 -379.:90 2.C95 0 0 -1767400 1 S(3.74 17674:00 19 i 3.7 ValleyAcres 10-81180-010-01 0 0 ' 3' 1M 3./251 0 0 957 -396 �6 , .5 396.00 TOTAL FRONTAGE ,.._0* . •... 1938.42 zaN ASSESSMENT RECOVERY I 67,301.93 4084.00 6-773-72702 438,757.95- • 112/005-2515.may 6-7377.37 7` >'3 • • • June 28, 1994 PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT MODEL SIBLEY TERMINAL INDUSTRIAL PARK - YANKEE DOODLE ROAD PATCH/OVERLAY ALTERNATIVE CITY OF EAGAN PROJECT NO. 661-R COST ESTIMATE: PATCH/OVERLAY YANKEE DOODLE ROAD Milling 6,000 SY 1.25 7,500 Crack seal 2,000 LF 0.80 1,600 Bituminous patch 800 SY 17.75 14,200 2341 bituminous wear course 1,000 TON 24.00 24,000 Subtotal $47,300 Contingencies (10%) 4,730 Estimated Construction Cost $52,030 Engineering and Administration (30%) 15,609 TOTAL COST - OVERLAY SEGMENT $67,600 BASIS OF STREET ASSESSMENT - Assessment Bituminous Street Repair (patch/overlay) $67,600 Concrete Curb Repairs (none) - 0 - Storm Sewer Repairs (none) - 0 - Driveway Assessment (none) (as requested) Sanitary Sewer/Watermain Repairs (none) - 0 - $67,600 (100%) TOTAL PROJECT COST $67,600 Basis: 50% Front Foot, 50% Area Assessment Street Assessment: $33,800 = 1,938.45 FF 112/005-2001aun $31,800 = 157.09 Acres City -0- (0%) $17.44/FF $215.16/Acre F.b. (7) !g Is- -June 28, 1:994 --- III PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL Sibley Terminal Industrial Park - Yankee Doodle Road Patch/Overlay City of Eagan Project 661R NOTE: Assessment calculations use footages in Column 3 to calculate Column 5 and percent area in Column 4 to calculate Column 7. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Legal Descr. Property ID No. Frontage - Yankee Doodle Road East of Terminal Drive Tributary Area Street Assess. 1@ 4-7T447"-- FF /1,1/Z1/ Driveway Assess. @ 2,145.00 EA Area Benefit $315.461 Total Assess. Acre '( ; 671103 Block 1, Lot 1 10-68050-010-01 0 3.93 0 0 7o9.( ,. 7c9.14. $4575* Block 1, Lot 2 10-68050-020-01 0 5.12 0 0 'PAW _ 9.23.2y1, 2 Block 1, Lot 3 10-68050-031-01 0 1.00 0 0 190' 4, 6. 180.3)38 -29 10-68050-032-01 2.07 373.4 _73.373.AL 445738 Block 1, Lot 4 10-68050-041-01 0 4.10 0 0 '�� 739.3/ 58246 11110 10-68050-042-01 1.19 2/y. . 114,sg 266764 Block 1, Lot 5 10-68050-050-01 0 4.42 0 0 717°/ 7 97oj 95$1, 10-68050-062-01 0.74 133.441,_ 1 133.pi159.2- Block 1, Lot 6 10-68050-061-01 0 4.77 0 0 Bto € 4- _ - SC0.t31,026.31 Block 1, Lot 7 10-68050-070-01 0 6.58 0 i 0 ig..s , A -1186611744545 Block 1, Lot 8 10-68050-080-01 0 4.69 0 946 0 7e Yl $ 44:211,009.1Q Block 1, Lot 9 10-68050-090-01 0 4.42 0 0 -747..1 `- X 0 954.01 7971 Block 1, Lot 10 10-68050-100-01 0 3.71 0 0 GG8 91 -r r;g8.9 1798.29 Block 1, Lot 11 Parcel A 0 2.00 00��ty I3 .o.6f 43042 Parcel B 0 1.75 0 0 315 -CL . - 315.51. 376.53 Block 2, Lot 1 10-68050-011-02 0 1.98 0 0 3.5`!.43 =:1r 4 357.53 -1-_,..0 426792, 10-68050-010-02 2.24 4x3.91 ,(, 40 3.12,48.14 Block 2, Lot 2 10-68050-020-02 0 4.19 0 0 75 .5y 984.53 y9466 ( .52 2, Lot 3 10-68050-030-02 0 0.78 0 0 iYA.fBlock •J - L_. 1 t4 14 6.6 ±6x;.64. 10-68050-031-02 0.78 - 1'fo.6Y 168.61 10-68050-032-02 1.07 Pala" " -111.91 239723 10-68050-033-02 0.81 I Wag. ; 146,01. 174728 ck 2, Lot 4 10-68050-040-02 0 3.83 0 0 4510-43t . `A� C96.9 8.244 Block 2, Lot 5 10-68050-050-02 0 3.98 0 0 7/Z L7 _ . - 717. (.7 8x734 112/005-2003.jun Pe 6 . 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Legal Descr. Property ID No. Frontage - Yankee Doodle Road East of Terminal Tributary Area Street Assess. @ Driveway Assess. a 2,145.00 EA Area Benefit 0 Total Assess. 17.44/ FF 6f - Acre Drive / y.St{ / Sp', 3 Block 2, Lot 6 10-68050-060-02 0 4.31 00 927_s 1771 8 92'1;34 777.t$ Block 2, Lot 7 10-68050-070-02 0 2.97 0 o 63 639 3 $35.35 3. 681.43_ . e Block 2, Lot 8 10-68050-081-02 0 3.23 0 0 : - r: - 81.43 Wig. 10-68050-082-02 1.07 192.44: s . ' 23@:22 19.2.9 4 Si ��33 Block 2, Lot 9 296.02 0 5,16 59- 0 0 3;5* Y3oy.i35 Best Brands; 363.64 0 k344.S8.. 0 0 6,341.88 Lot 1, Block 1 £a 87.33 SA 87.33 51. G 41.18 Government Lot SE 1/4 Section 8 161.00 8.62 x.- 4• 0 -4,662-32 ,8 6 011-76 A 3 *� .9 - •- 38 95.3 o Government Lot SE 1/4 Section 8 297.63 0 0 0 - 5,190.67 IIII 020-76 4.3.17-5/ y y 3�7 •S y fly R.L.Johnson 10-39901-010-01 640.13 9.51 - ,'�-ter 0 3 41y6.17 13,246.01i 2nd Addition ct 307.4/ 1- t I,OZZ.33 Comsery No. 10-18200-011-01 180.00 19.14 34-34,42- 0 7,257.58 One 2 617.20 4.045. S1 Mardelann 10-47285-020-00 0 12.73 0 0 '44,48.3, 738.99, .8 5 .' Outlot B L Comsery No. 10-18200-012-01 0 13.01 0 0 qq 3, 23 2,799.23 One (Partial) 3- a.3,ic•94 BS Comsery No. 10-18200-013-01 0 4.75 0 0 1,02L. g .2_ 1,022.01 One (Partial) `--,- S. -G,521 11.1g Valley Acres 10-81180-010-01 0 6.80 0 0 1-$3= >•,426•.09 I -2X.18 TOTAL FRONTAGE OR 1938.42 15 ACREAGE �`.e_ VA ASSESSMENT RECOVERY 3.37806.-23- 0 53.0 _, 67,607.3`9 • 112/005-2003 jun E _ 17=;..R4 f..-uu moi- Co. f = 4 a+ • A Alt* _ Rc c-ovev A 3'�• 3 F a • EAGAN HWY. 13 DRAINAGE STUDY Yankee Doodle Road and Terminal Drive Findings (1) Flooding problems exist at low point of Yankee Doodle Drive and Yankee Drive intersection, and also at Terminal Drive sag point, to the northeast. (2) Both locations have 2 catchbasins. Peak discharges require at least 4 at each location to provide proper inlet capacity so curb is not overtopped. (3) Trunk storm sewer line serving Sibley Terminal Industrial Park and also residential area east of Highway 13 is undersized. IllRecommendations • (1) Provide additional inlet capacity at the low flooding points by installing additional catchbasins. (2) Prior to installing additional catchbasins, insure ponds both upstream and downstream of the location have allowable freeboard. Because system is already at capacity, more water into the pipes at the low flooding points would increase pond water levels. (3) Investigate replacement of the undersized trunk line, from the 24" pipe beneath Highway 13 to the 48" pipe just upstream of the Terminal Drive sag point. Account for any additional development within the Sibley Terminal Industrial Park. (4) As an alternative to replacement of the undersized trunk line, a detention pond within Sibley Terminal Industrial Park would relieve some of the pipe surcharging problems. However, the pipe beneath Highway 13 would still need replacing. • • MSI METING MIME SUBJECT ,-./• /.,q/ (9�-/.� Sia PROJECT Ecy4h /,-d r - ay k CLIENT 5-(4-1,1/4-1/)/ PROJECT NUMBER DATE -3 -6 - 9 t BY D A" CHECKED PAGE OF 2 ria4c p$/ k-pf'p rbpesecQ 1 oca Filo add, a( Cg's 1 o, � i 24• c' 05� a pap lb 4,,m , hes IJ Ay i rQE. CCr/iil�l r f�Pf (A// //0w) ?6" G-/7% 27_5 c Cs Z (' 3,26 % zdre 26" / y6 So, 6 4/8' D-?‘ % iC,2 5Y ,6 % 373,1 zV" 0 % 30. 0 MIMING BNGIN®MS kir/ / / 8 SUBJECT PROJECT CUENT PROJECT NUMBER BY CHECKED DATE PAGE OF (valL,res A/ 1 n'd o) -4ece s a /5-7 a,if 3-g Zv s, -z a- 3- e 5 /88 o D, z 3 7 / 3 /77 0.2 7 /g y.I./ o,?s 36 /z- yz-5 Q,7s ;? / z/ , S" , -7s 7 /8 /7.O ,',75" 5, 9 SO • ase ca j.7 Tib Z 0 .r,ocfe T� = Z 0 7 = 3G lSgs- S 2, S g -?d 7 /1 7rnl 4nGi ��7 / irS - !if S4 )4r," G� / -y- d (.50 ,� �Pv -� T )., (3� / 0.025 7 -2- z z , Gvrj Bo 0-,975 6 ' 41 0.0 z8 7 c 0.007 Bo , o 6-e g 1 c,0/00 CiR /CPS 3 ,7es/x/a -- • f.,71 - en C, y erre j.76/Lis'4 q/ �v� • • • ******************80-80 LIST OF INPUT DATA FOR TR -20 HYDROLOGY****************** JOB TR -20 FULLPRINT SUMMARY NOPLOTS TITLE 112 CITY OF EAGAN - HIGHWAY 13 DRAINAGE STUDY TITLE 001 5 -YEAR TO 100 -YEAR RAINFALL EVENTS - FILE: HWY13.20 6 RUNOFF 1 01 1 0.025 72. 0.33 1 1 1 1 1 BAS 1 6 RUNOFF 1 02 2 0.008 80. 0.25 1 1 1 1 1 BAS 2 6 RUNOFF 1 03 3 0.028 69. 0.33 1 1 1 1 1 BAS 3 6 RUNOFF 1 04 4 0.028 69. 0.33 1 1 1 1 1 BAS 4 6 RUNOFF 1 05 5 0.007 80. 0.25 1 1 1 1 1 BAS 5 6 RUNOFF 1 06 6 0.066 88. 0.50 1 1 1 1 1 BAS 6 6 RUNOFF 1 07 7 0.010 88. 0.25 1 1 1 1 1 BAS Er7 6 RUNOFF 1 08 1 0.027 88. 0.33 1 1 1 1 1 BAS .&1 ENDATA 7 INCREM 6 0.083 5 -MIN 7 COMPUT 7 01 08 0.0 3.6 1.0 2 2 01 01 5 YEAR ENDCMP 1 7 INCREM 6 0.083 5 -MIN 7 COMPUT 7 01 08 0.0 4.2 1.0 2 2 01 02 10 YEAR ENDCMP 1 7 INCREM 6 0.083 5 -MIN 7 COMPUT 7 01 08 0.0 5.4 1.0 2 2 01 03 50 YEAR ENDCMP 1 7 INCREM 6 0.083 5 -MIN 7 COMPUT 7 01 08 0.0 6.0 1.0 2 2 01 04 100 YR ENDCMP 1 ENDJOB 2 0*******************************END OF 80-80 LIST******************************** 1 • -yy TR20 XEQ 04-06-94 14:37 CITY OF EAGAN - HIGHWAY 13 DRAINAGE STUDY JOB 1 SUMMARY REV PC 09/83(.2) 5 -YEAR TO 100 -YEAR RAINFALL EVENTS - FILE: HWY13.20 PAGE 27 SUMMARY TABLE 1 - SELECTED RESULTS OF STANDARD AND EXECUTIVE CONTROL INSTRUCTIONS IN THE ORDER PERFORMED (A STAR(*) AFTER THE PEAK DISCHARGE TIME AND RATE (CFS) VALUES INDICATES A FLAT TOP HYDROGRAPH A QUESTION MARK(?) INDICATES A HYDROGRAPH WITH PEAK AS LAST POINT.) SECTION/ STANDARD RAIN ANTEC MAIN PRECIPITATION PEAK DISCHARGE STRUCTURE CONTROL DRAINAGE TABLE MOIST TIME RUNOFF ID OPERATION AREA # COND INCREM BEGIN AMOUNT DURATION AMOUNT ELEVATION TIME RATE RATE (SO MI) (HR) (HR) (IN) (HR) (IN) (FT) (HR) (CFS) (CSM) ALTERNATE 1 STORM 1 + STRUCTURE 1 RUNOFF .03 2 2 .08 .0 3.60 24.00 1.18 STRUCTURE 2 RUNOFF .01 2 2 .08 .0 3.60 24.00 1.71 STRUCTURE 3 RUNOFF .03 2 2 .08 .0 3.60 24.00 1.01 STRUCTURE 4 RUNOFF .03 2 2 .08 .0 3.60 24.00 1.01 STRUCTURE 5 RUNOFF .01 2 2 .08 .0 3.60 24.00 1.71 12.12 18.90 755.9 12.06 10.25 1280.7 12.12 17.57 627.5 12.12 17.57 627.5 12.06 8.97 1280.7 STRUCTURE 6 RUNOFF .07 2 2 .08 .0 3.60 24.00 2.36 12.19 82.87 1255.5 STRUCTURE 7 RUNOFF .01 2 2 .08 .0 3.60 24.00 2.36 --- 12.05 17.38 1738.0 STRUCTURE 8 RUNOFF .03 2 2 .08 .0 3.60 24.00 2.36 12.09 41.62 1541.5 ALTERNATE 1 STORM 2 + STRUCIURE 1 RUNOFF .03 2 2 .08 .0 4.20 24.00 1.60 12.11 25.99 1039.7 STRUCTURE 2 RUNOFF .01 2 2 .08 .0 4.20 24.00 2.21 --- 12.05 13.19 1648.7 STRUCTURE 3 RUNOFF .03 2 2 .08 .0 4.20 24.00 1.40 --- 12.12 24.98 892.0 STRUCTURE 4 RUNOFF .03 2 2 .08 .0 4.20 24.00 1.40 --- 12.12 24.98 892.0 STRUCTURE 5 RUNOFF .01 2 2 .08 .0 4.20 24.00 2.21 --- 12.05 11.54 1648.7 STRUCTURE 6 RUNOFF .07 2 2 .08 .0 4.20 24.00 2.91 --- 12.19 101.80 1542.4 STRUCTURE 7 RUNOFF .01 2 2 .08 .0 4.20 24.00 2.91 --- 12.05 21.29 2129.3 STRUCTURE 8 RUNOFF .03 2 2 .08 .0 4.20 24.00 2.91 --- 12.09 51.03 1890.1 • + ALTERNATE 1 STORM 3 STRUCTURE 1 RUNOFF .03 2 2 .08 .0 5.40 24.00 2.51 12.10 41.33 1653.2 STRUCTURE 2 RUNOFF .01 2 2 .08 .0 5.40 24.00 3.24 --- 12.05 19.28 2409.'' STRUCTURE 3 RUNOFF .03 2 2 .08 .0 5.40 24.00 2.25 --- 12.11 41.28 1474.2 STRUCTURE 4 RUNOFF .03 2 2 .08 .0 5.40 24.00 2.25 12.11 41.28 1474.2 3L% -7 --STRUCTURE 5 RUNOFF .01 2 2 .08 .0 5.40 24.00 3.24 12.05 15.87 2409. STRUCTURE 6 RUNOFF .07 2 2 .08 .0 5.40 24.00 4.05 --- 12.18 139.78 2117.6 STRUCTURE 7 RUNOFF .01 2 2 .08 .0 5.40 24.00 4.05 --- 12.04 29.13 2912.9 STRUCTURE 8 RUNOFF .03 2 2 .08 .0 5.40 24.00 4.04 --- 12.09 69.90 2588.7 ALTERNATE 1 STORM 4 + STRUCTURE 1 RUNOFF .03 2 2 .08 .0 6.00 24.00 2.99 --- 12.10 49.39 1975.6 STRUCTURE 2 RUNOFF .01 2 2 .08 .0 6.00 24.00 3.78 --- 12.05 22.37 2796.7 STRUCTURE 3 RUNOFF .03 2 2 .08 .0 6.00 24.00 2.71 --- 12.11 49.96 1784.2 STRUCTURE 4 RUNOFF .03 2 2 .08 .0 6.00 24.00 2.71 --- 12.11 49.96 1784.2 STRUCTURE 5 RUNOFF .01 2 2 .08 .0 6.00 24.00 3.78 --- 12.05 19.58 2796.7 1 /0-1' • • TR20 XEQ 04-06-94 14:37 CITY OF EAGAN - HIGHWAY 13 DRAINAGE STUDY JOB 1 SUMMARY REV PC 09/83(.2) 5 -YEAR TO 100 -YEAR RAINFALL EVENTS - FILE: HWY13.20 PAGE 28 SUMMARY TABLE 1 - SELECTED RESULTS OF STANDARD AND EXECUTIVE CONTROL INSTRUCTIONS IN THE ORDER PERFORMED (A STAR(*) AFTER THE PEAK DISCHARGE TIME AND RATE (CFS) VALUES INDICATES A FLAT TOP HYDROGRAPH A QUESTION MARK(?) INDICATES A HYDROGRAPH WITH PEAK AS LAST POINT.) SECTION/ STANDARD RAIN ANTEC MAIN PRECIPITATION PEAK DISCHARGE STRUCTURE CONTROL DRAINAGE TABLE MOIST TIME RUNOFF ID OPERATION AREA # COND INCREM BEGIN AMOUNT DURATION AMOUNT ELEVATION TIME RATE RATE (SQ MI) (HR) (HR) (IN) (HR) (IN) (FT) (HR) (CFS) (CSM) ALTERNATE 1 STORM 4 +STRULIURE 6 RUNOFF .07 2 2 .08 .0 6.00 24.00 4.62 12.18 158.74 2405.1 0 -yr- r- STRUCTURE 7 RUNOFF .01 2 2 .08 .0 6.00 24.00 4.62 12.04 33.04 3303.7 STRUCTURE 8 RUNOFF .03 2 2 .08 .0 6.00 24.00 4.62 12.09 79.31 2937.3 '4.4) 1 • • • • • TR20 XEQ 04-06-94 14:37 CITY OF EAGAN - HIGHWAY 13 DRAINAGE STUDY JOB 1 SUMMARY REV PC 09/83(.2) 5 -YEAR TO 100 -YEAR RAINFALL EVENTS - FILE: HWY13.20 PAGE 29 SUMMARY TABLE 3 - DISCHARGE (CFS) AT XSECTIONS AND STRUCTURES FOR ALL STORMS AND ALTERNATES XSECTION/ DRAINAGE STRUCTURE AREA STORM NUMBERS ID (SQ MI) 1 2 3 4 0 STRUCTURE 8 .03 ALIERNAIE 1 0 STRUCTURE 7 .01 ALIERNAIE 1 0 STRUCTURE 6 .07 ALTERNATE 1 0 STRUCTURE 5 .01 ALTERNATE 1 0 STRUCTURE 4 .03 ALTERNATE 1 0 STRUCTURE 3 .03 ALIERNAIE 1 0 STRUCTURE 2 .01 ALTERNATE 1 0 STRUCTURE 1 .03 41.62 51.03 69.90 79.31 17.38 21.29 29.13 33.04 82.87 101.80 139.78 158.74 8.97 11.54 16.87 19.58 17.57 24.98 41.28 49.96 17.57 24.98 41.28 49.96 10.25 13.19 19.28 22.37 ALTERNATE 1 18.90 25.99 41.33 49.39 1END OF 1 JOBS IN THIS RUN • 1St INSULTING EM I SUBJECT PROJECT CUENT PROJECT NUMBER DATE BY CHECKED PAGE OF Y"tet Qocd/e //k T /o c(s VI')lee( i 5-cc,<9t, a t //rd 9)''/e: %c% LIQ etc,' 1 t f/7/(Sst/• tend:h 2 � :oQ Fro., /,2& 1 ,s �x4./ old/ 7*/s coy/d 6l rr Bch ,47-2 p -ed /eni ar a - ca use c/d, .5-6-,e a.•� ,� av&- /oa'.;:y , ice ,nay / ck //o„1/ 1�firau� Z " tec/4 ,h Ice? /o..,.1°: a s 4 6 bets: s play J7o) ��a.,c% dei,rece, t�Q �, <y / dow 4-eQ,2-, P'PeS c{r €r S• ed Ay nd feaa,'6/L Mew I- �it9 4in vireitni MSS WhSULTOG MGR SUBJECT PROJECT CLIENT PROJECT NUMBER DATE BY CHECKED PAGE OF £q 9-4 y t.r 'z] i/ui ("as /1( a""d hide( Adehad 1 ill / c P C 710 Fein, Esc 0 /2" ____I lb, ,1 5-c/{- j'6.i /ic,C� /44 i i0f C- `�1 Zg ch • Z� a& 4/2(1`x/ /<Cf'' tfildlr f/t'/ iepe 2 7 cTs cz ac �, % y affu i +a Q /D Z iIT `i `{yq/ 0.36'l 86 • CONSCGTI G KKGIVERS SUBJECT PROJECT CLIENT PROJECT NUMBER DATE BY CHECKED PAGE OF fpas / - L/ a// //kd/L, /enedfc, /Ay /3 ( z4i" fc) /6yfr fed, 9 2 3 8" 26 /3 zs zs Wiz 4 --ay ��d �, Bl c ✓ / -117, �i`�G'�G� _c1//.i4'ckfry - Cc S c�', 7L 7 50k'1edS7 e ceS { o v c e c lose 71z2 Full • eal'e 4as C q,,) ae-,' 5e/ ?rl=ia'r9/�Ta cy6 CtS Ca�a�, y 06I,%ws 0.7 /.k€/y eKceeJ''ed /F /cc)( /i7170,- s c//l'( 6/ • • • CONSULTING ENGINES SUBJECT PROJECT CLIENT PROJECT NUMBER DATE BY CHECKED PAGE OF � S 5,'./y deve/cis, iP el v, / 3 and ( f e /ore �,u� � �/mirx�� rive l eco , i1,9 :'�'�� R' 60{' /Dc ?i7y ri / tysirea„-t , q/Dy- / nkfee k'a'/e 0 /L) grid /iilvtee Adie , rd', 0 ,/e rk_ Gi /mac /la /.0 G -Fs -/7ers al ir2(7,1 P e7' /1((de Y.';,> E ,irec tis 7 RC1-) »)76/, 7' 5/ r� r.067",/��.. �� y� - (ew/a/ MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Engineering Services Division Technical Memorandum No. 92 -38 -ES -09 December 31, 1992 TO: Distribution 57, 618 & 650 FROM: John E. S Director, Engin Assistant Chief ; gineer g Services Division SUBJECT: Bituminous Pave , nt Design Chart Beginning immediately, Attachment 1 to this Technical Memorandum, "Bituminous Pavement Design Chart (Aggregate Base)", is to be used instead of Figure 7-5.03A of the Road Design Manual; bituminous mixes are to be designed according to Attachment 2, "Design Criterion for Mainline Bituminous Pavements"; and Attachment 3, "Special Requirements for Type 41/42 Mixes" is to be included in the Special Provisions of appropriate projects. The provisions of this Technical Memorandum will remain in effect until the Geotechnical and Pavement Manual, which contains Attachments 1 and 2, is issued and Attachment 3 is added to the Mn/DOT Standard Specifications for Construction. Revisions to the old chart include the general reduction of required Granular Equivalents for pavement designed to carry less than 100,000 EASL's over a 20 -year life constructed on subgrades having Stabilorneter "R" Values of 5, 10, 15 and 20. A second change is the elimination of individual 7, 9 and 10 ton roadway designs. The Pavement Engineering Section believes that the design of structure thickness using granular equivalents should be based upon the number of ESAL's the pavement is expected to carry. The type of loads a pavement is expected to carry should be reflected in the calculation of these design ESAL's. The provisions of this Technical Memorandum were developed by a committee of personnel from the Office of Materials Research and Engineering and the District Materials Engineers and presented to the aggregate producers group and MAPA. Attachments 6C -S3-8£-36 'waw •ycal « wewl, ..;y • o 0 NE111111 MIN v Granular Equivalents (GE) Inches O VN+ O U1 O c71 O I I I mm 1 Imum a 1 1111110111111111111111111111111111111 il (LI 11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111,111M 1111111111.111111111111101111 NE 7-1 MINIMOIMII iJ1IHE if i I 1111111 3.: CI) Min -0 1111 "i 1 111rAMMIN -.4 EDC g m 4/iIVil/ ._ / ninmAVnr 0� m = vl�rurEo.�ra>.1r� ■ mc witiorm m 3 K m ; !l w��sttttra �` E om T ►'41.17111.1141111111111 � p C.711111 -1 Z.- III • co WIIIIIIIMMUFAIVAINIIMIC;=1 z nimp /a� raur/uI. nou n vlt�J/ .lD�"/�%"/V./�%/I�UV.� 1 m ..Iv...�.�La.___-__V-��V....•uEU[ AW 1 > 8 , , Alt®►Am!<ionm.mr►3sys.aMMINI fib - T. vAIIuMMINIMMINWAINI,sPsvAIIIwIIIIIIIUMv.WmMI=W AIRMIIIIIMMIMMEI r- - 1 A r A iibIIiIPASIi1ILiiIII1I m 1111FAIMPAII/MINF D3 0 -4 vAnrin,WVAMPARIP m 11aVIM•IE• VAIIII ,IlVJ 1 1 CO /t./IMMIII MUM1 •.I��M/I�//II•�® , D r_____ av�ttisirWW.i svWwva INOWAIIIMINIMMIMMINI , _ , ra��sa=ao►�vavi i w ••1 7 EOM flhjII3I1IfI&AIIIIIIhlluItI 1 1 1 1 1 1 11 III I 1111 1111 1111 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 um 111 • 1111 11111111111111 11.01111111111111111111111 NEEMINIMI - vOia O CD (asse aTe6ai66y) Ireq u6isaa wawa/Ed snouiwnlle 9.e -s eye tI Wan 0 rW CONSULTING ENGINEERS I Maier Stewart & Associates Inc. SUBJECT PROJECT CLIENT PROJ. NO DATE BY CHKD PAGE OF •assigG"--- /41 — L- k • 1 3: 443 j3,u pc Adtp-A-Irr4:Er\ k; -t& eeer-62, ;•..; bra_44---4 JLtk • 1)Z,c(4ie-47 0 sb-oe (FL -Lee -Pk 9‘t1' fa-v-e-rv‘a-0%-t- Q26-€ A -0-7A) g,_ Qo ,ar.be (bet,0€1_ .p-remn 4,42e,urrY%40Z ipzet,y‘. „pirn a-tru 4y2Q _ g_x_s_a0A--ege.e-- fc- A01 -c) •0 4 2,S - 30 tifee41:° T7 C?Lm • oviaA41\ • • • MSS CONSCLTING ENGINEERS SUBJECT PROJECT CLIENT PROJECT NUMBER BY CHECKED 0-6 (-11(11 k.t-19 u -0e1. -A -`i *13()0 10 Li`06 AA‘ Ll.t NG7 (7f60 sy mity-b[Avf� / T,9'") (T ado Ff�� #4(6tre • 1St COVSGLTIVG ENGINEERS A ‘{c4A,tkee TaerrIfLee SUBJECT PROJECT CLIENT PROJECT NUMBER DATE BY CHECKED PAGE OF ca 44 s 11St t1 SULING EWERS TO: CIVIL ENGINEERING: ENVIRONMENTAL MUNICIPAL PLANNING tRIEY/NG STRUCTURAL 7R4F C 'Rar,_CRL TION 1326 Energy Park Drive St. Paul, MN 55108 612-644-4389 Fax 612.644-9446 0800 Shelard Parkway Minneapolis, MN 55441 612-546-0432 Fax 612-544-6398 FROM: Steve Gatlin Bruce Irish SUBJECT: Terminal Road - MSA Project # 112-005-10 DATE: February 22, 1994 At the February 7, 1994, Public Informational meeting, there was a request to associate costs with each of the objectives of the project. The six objectives and associated costs are as follows: Objective 1. Reconstruct Sag Point on Yankee Doodle Road and portions of Yankee Doodle - Terminal intersection Estimated rose $ 131,000 2. Provide structural capacity for anticipated ESAL over next 20 years $ 173,000 3. Provide required drainage on Yankee Doodle Road sag point 4. Provide inlet capacity at Terminal Road sag point and new culvert and catch basin at north T.H. 13 connection. 5. Replace driveway aprons 6. Utility repairs Total Project Cost $ 32,000 $ 84,000 $ 49,000 $ 1,400 $ 484,000 1 Includes contingency, engineering, and administration costs. There was a consensus that repairs to the sag point on Yankee Doodle Road are necessary. The pavement has deteriorated to the point that an overlay would have a short service life. Objectives 1 and 3 are the core of the project and are definitely recommended. ooszam.sb • • • The reconstruction of the Terminal Drive and Yankee Doodle Road intersection was proposed for the replacement of bituminous adjacent to valley gutter and replacement of some of the "home made" curb that was placed on top of the existing bituminous for traffic control purposes. This aspect could possible be scaled back to full depth patching alone. It is certainly possible to defer the overlay to provide structural strength for anticipated loadings over the next 20 -years. The consequences of deferring this work would be that the need for structural work to limit stress from truck loadings would need to be addressed again when the condition of the road has deteriorated from its present condition. The storm sewer at Terminal Road sag point was to provide inlet capacity in accordance with Eagan's Engineering Guidelines. This has the effects of both limiting liability due to standing water during storms and of prolonging pavement life. Significant local distress to street pavement is associated with driveway entrances. The provision to construct driveway aprons would protect street edges and enhance the overall appearance of the area. cc: Greg Stonehouse +IliVallaMaier Stewart & ASUaeEsNGcS Fi/P /1z—oos-k TELEPHONE CONVERSATION DATE II /2/93 TIME io = o -o PROJ.NO. PERSON CALLING/CALLED P 6 t PHONE NO. 93 I - 0 1 i0 AGENCY REPRESENTED `2o - EMPLOYEE PLACING/TAKING CALL frlw7 ` Q? CONVERSATION �ni✓� d& -&a .04 •_AiiI _ 4. - I� Qr plr- (Lefio i 1 • FOLLOW UP ACTION REQUIRED 00 Donohue Engineers & Architects CLIENT PROJECTY� kE-E-- 0/ ' - PROJECT NO. BY DATE PAGE NO. 5 - 1 $ : s - - - 7 f ..{.,.«. -r---T—-� ..».. � i i 1 _ 3 ...... ; ..�-...mat.+..».... s t# s jI 1 W�-:'�.. ::,. _ 1 t �/ �. jl 1 1 �;�- • _ F'� LL �� _ "tZ� € ; t E.� .f. \,.,, i l" 4 1 j- j- t. t i i i� --4 'it 1 !-;. _ -. !Ji ` i k f ' { C -;71111:.$-;-`,/ '----- 1 Tb d (- i _ _ .� _ _ - _ _.... i 3 s _ ` _ +__ _i•_, g_.._.._.... -i_,.-. -.-�._-_-'_ ___t _ ,_ _ -t."' --r j j i 1 1 1 1 1 I: 6 n s., i 4- f t- 1 j 1 e...,.---.-...."._-:, 77; i i -i... --,;'/../ 1 ! 1 ; i 1 i ! t I ! } ..r • I }j • �yy'Cy, .i • a , , •-d,••---;- i i s f i t! "'r 1 4, _ 1 [ i 1 - 6111:56:1--1:—: - �h � Yr -y__ --i - - I ; 1.i!!.%.,',__'1-ii.ra6 - =x.06- -r•--i---__.}_. ._-t-..3-_-...._-•i - .-�- 5'O _ =-�r-i F.,-Y'._.'_7"_.''Fij'"+---•--"•-_Lt.. -..—;_ _ _ _._Y..._ } "7' i-- , —� I t i ' a: -r I 1 t t I":lie : ' r—f_-, ` j r� f ? t 1 t .� _ LZ "i' n _c, i��". f� o �r*i ! }� r L� i e; S f _;- 4 . - `` 1 3 , , ' 7 t i i t 1 --t 7 i , t i 1 I - ,..--?_ -- .!-L____4_1„.....4.1 - }_..___r. !_ r a t 4 i e- , _._ f. . , . „ —gym ,' --__f,_.:.__._. _ —i = —r -- _.1 ---,----t--f.---r--- —i a —' , i i �, r —i r- +-� -f— j 3 ! I 1 1 ! 1 4-- i 1 i- Le�! I 1'! 7,' I 1... 1 1 ! i I I 1 1 i j— , y ti: L i" i ib . 1 j 1 i �, . ..a ,Ta i a --i 1- I t t 3 t i -I. _ r 1 1 - I I 1 ' I i T 1 1�I '; 1 j f 1 i I i 111111111111.111.111111111111 4 it ! 1 f� ! �.h . 1 i �^ j ij I i- i IN."_"_3.L._ S 7 - - < i Y•-_'. _...5"-•_ •—:s-----:( i�.i1 ' 7""' _,L._ - j!i 1 r%1 i r 9 1 I i t i ! i t t f ix;7"-_":_1-7 1 - tib '^ I I i 1 i ' �� I ;1 i ; ; i. '� — 1 ; ( # 1 f ? I i ea _ .. f I i j�� _ 31' �jgti' i x 4•.:-..-.,:`.. t 7 TT CICa i l i ' • ' ',•Tt7 i ; • j ' .••-''- -j f ._.L / .rt 1 t I f { #' .?res i 1 'i --: , z r r � i -- 'i i {i 1 f ; - t I "f. -i-� 3 - T�•-'/' f 5 t ..,�..,..W,.......v..---,,..e..,.. _t --. _...__..�...... e i + Y r"t i 1. %. ( /%. 7-7. a_ ii� -i:_ .._.p .. � . •^ _ - ' � _ . - � Donohue Engineers & Architects ( • - I : ' 4 , ' ; 1 • 1 CLIENT '--1e21Ct PROJECT NO. BY PROJECTYAtiX cc. DLT". DATE PAGE NO. . • " 4.'4 e' i 'V , .-,...., F 1 i 1 I t 1 • I • ; , • 1 t . • , • , , , , • , , • . • , , 1,--tf,, c • , , . • • • . I f , __.• ...... • _t_ 4_ ., _ . •:t • • 4 -/- , 4- I ; t..--,1. ....-. ......--...... .............--..... t --......4. ....i---- 4. 4 4 -i 1 , : • ,; 1 • : ; - t , 4 1"t_ 1-- --!--- - - i ; --1- .4_, -. = , 4 '. - ' —' t_ • ; L 1 •- it 1, L : , , . , „ • I , 1 , 1 1 4-- I. . • • • I ' : 4 i -4.-- I.. .., ' 3 . 3-• 7;37-........,__---t-.-- i 1 1 I 1 ' -..:4:-. - : ...... •:•-74., 1 t .... 1 " F I t ; I 1 ;''' I -....- .--t . r 1 't i I 1 t ,..._ : H.- i L I • . , 1 ! -1---t----t----t-- ---1---1--- t----- • .1- i. 1----,-----r— , , I , r---1 T-1 • "--i I 1--- ) • , , I---1 -±, —1---4- , 1 li! i i t i I ' 11 1 j, L I .t24 4L_H!!11! , 1i motiot -4- 1 t - -1- ; . • t I k t t LLL I it I'll Li I I 1 I 4444- 1 I_ 1 r 4' i I-- -- 111! it: I i tff -I. ! • --T- 1 1 r ; I 1 ,Ittill * I I- j I. 1 I I • . • t III! --.- I ; I -• I:1 ;I';;;1 11 ;.;; ttt4 4- 4 •,.! I I -I- • • • I t • • I • ; ! • I L • t I 4: ' ; 1. ; i = ; I; t!ii I t I , • . I ; : i..,......., , , ... .....______ ."2., ....i, .... 2 . _.. _7. i... .............i........i..........,_ .....____ L..„ 4- ----.4- I__ 4.__-:...- -,----t- t _ 7 ,...._ • • f - <F> ryo, -•-,,---•- .^, _ . • , • . -{-. • • ......::::;. • I . LE:le-I.-4C • ! t-1 1 L @ -2.1576, : . , • • ! — ..!: a ,j1-7pi • . . 4 —1--. — . . . . . . . . • 2 -t„ -:AI Q . . : .: .....,....................i.,. .......* r. -- — —tt -i,,'' !..;,1• . - „ 1 _ - i 4 .. ! I ii 1 • 1 ' I i ' • . , i - , ;1••--Tr-:.:1' t;j I ----; h 1 1- , -4---1 I -4.- . • • ; i 1 I • : •,, , __-•;, _ .....4.,..•:,. .- ...._...._.44111•,-_ _;_4!:•• _ • _ •. :, . ;. .:: ,,,..•,.- •:.,..:. -r. 4 - •i,,.,. .,.• 4.•i•• .:!1•1 :. 4•— .. -1• i,.-. ____:,,l.- • ----4itl11t—. t;i•: --;!.,,.•,,- 1 tti•.; •!.:-•. it-,_.', - —--_it,,!••.-1t',.,• i•,•_,:•_ _ Lt,,,•-. . Ii•I,i,• I I , -4 - i , t • ,- - i ___±-4--- ____i ___-___ __ __ , .4_ —.- t -._ }},,_ „• 1 1,.•'' _1.It-,; .__-_stt.- - I•.1 -' 3 • • i A-. • 1.. Donohue Engineers & Architects CLIENT E:A5Anto PROJECT AN0Ke-c-Doczt_WRID. PROJECT NO. BY DATE PAGE NO. 3 , • . ; • ; • • . • -• „ -9 14 • . . 44_4.443 44- - .i.;i : ; ; i . i : • 1.- , 1 I---, r! I. i , , ! : - -- : 1 _____ _ ! : 1 ' ' '. ' ''. • 4 ? 4 4 4 I ! ..99-..-;44 49-- : -4.44-• , 1 .9* -4-4"- -4'4 t--- t-- - i'' • - - : ; i 1 4 1 I ' . 1 i 1 i I t ' 1 i j ! ' ; . ; • 1 - . -I- I , - -i-- --1 ---r--f-4- ••-• r-- 4 •-•-•1•-• L''''. .---4- '-^;*--.-- ' --I- I i I I_ I i I ; . lilli 'II li _*1 : i ' i T • . [. __,_ 1 • , 4_ i _i_ It -r. f i 1 , , , I 4 L - 4 t T -I ri-- 1- - 2:4)10 1 1 ! I I , -4 t t ,---f- 4 1 i 1 I T I 1 i • 1--- ! + -f---,- -1,_ 4-.-4- .-1.- .4 . -i- t 1 I I ! I 1 1 9 rr--1 ' i\iv4.1,- to•1---! 4 i 1 I t I 1 ,,,..• , , .f.. , i 4 , , .. ,IIII L ! ..4. ! ! __.i• 1 , 1 ! I r , :: - i I i____1_ ri , . ,, -t -rt I --I, , 1 , i 1 1 : i ,_2 40____t____I. 4_. 1 f I .1 k. - i : ! 1 • t i ; T ,. : 1 i r - --y i + 1 --!-- 1 ! r m , , -, .- 1 ! r 1 i --1---- i I 4 .4 i 4- t l'IllIlii I , - 1 : 1 : 1 I I-- , t. • : i , . , I i , , ! t -- L -- 4 4 ' I- ', , !MI_ ! , 1 i r i , •,_ 4iiii 1 i 4 4 Jr ---4- --...,. , ±-HI----"L-71 ! ' . 4 ; I ''''ji ; 44 • 1 i .........1........t. ., 1 .....i_. -; L.- __-;._ 4,...4.----1..- ...,- t__ ;;;__ i -1,------ -1- ;--- 7----i• t ---t-- i-- __ . :._ ...1- . f.4.44. 4.....4..4.144____.k. . 1111 1f+111,1 - -•.•-•-• -4 ; -;----1-----i- •:. . ; I ; I 1 i ---]----1--- I 1 I I - T---. , 1 • --I 4 " - Jk. iI- -i- ii. 4---141 --,• - 4 1 1-- 4 -- 1I 4- : I I 1 t t 1 t . --I.-4-4. 4..........4.... I i 1 . I .. . • , } ;---14.-...-1 , . -1- # • 1 1 I , i I I 1---1 i- -÷- ' _,_ : ; / , ( • , : . '. . 1., • -.t. 4.1._... 7 .4r ___ i 1 . 1 1 I • i .-1.-- -4-- I 1 -.1. 1 , Hillili . 1 4 ' L...,...-..."_1 1 I ' I- -1---4 !;141111.1I•, 1, ' - I 17,_1 : : _,...! 1_, ____I____!, _4 , i i i , . , . , , i 1 i- -,- - , ---1 --1 -- • 4. ) 4 i- 4 ' i. ' 4 '4 1 I ,-- ,I, „,,,, ! it 111 : _, -_-. . ' 1 , . ! 44 ' . , . 1 . - • . . _ ,•,,1,,.,. ,- ---.i;!, ---•,!!1 ----t,1:.•. ---T/,-_-__÷t,11 -_-.-H--i;,,.- ,• ._..,,:•,,,____+.„,... ,_ . „,.„ .„•.._____ , I : ! ! , i it-- - 1•, ! -- -.A ! 1 . 1,• I ' I ' - , ! --i • I L • • 1 • : . . i i 4 • i .44 I r i 1 ---1 ,. 4 1 : 1 • ---4 • t I i .7 . i i t I i 4 • . . -4 --.;,--L. ....-; ; - k . 1 , k. I. ; . • . -4444. r / , . . . . . . . . . . - • : , , i -r ---- -,---..- ,-..-_-_,.- .. . . . f ' 4- • , I 44f oC) • ! ! i ---1 ,i;. •!t, - 4i. - 11t,;. , ....- k 444;II -V.... -t!! - - 4! .i•,: -• -- ! I1, - • • : 1!: , , ,„ 1i --- 4 i , , 1i ! ! , 1r • ! r -I 1 1 *1 -4,- _ 1.-• . ... , . _ - - . ....• _ - . - • Donohue Engineers & Architects CLIENTc��+-.) PROJECT YA--"4-.278csLE` fl. PROJECT NO. BY ov DATE PAGE NO. 5+00. • 1 i i I i i i —'t—_? --_A—.4 t ____ - •-_«•_, ._—_. St i 1 1— -- 1 ---4-----tI d----4_ — i -r31--4;_} I. , II It • i ! f -i_ i f 1 f : 1 1 i i t 3 1 I I 11 • v r , , , i i i 1 i !. . ss , i • .. , a.,"iii i� Y 1 , ,, 1 , -,- 1 i 1 ; i # I 1 1 a 1 f S -:SI -J. .L --t.. -4--. 1 I I 1 1 i , 1 i ; !- - _... I 1 .- y� - T } ..._.... `'"_. 1• __...---'-- _,I.' i ° r -I ^-�-- f_' '---1--- ; j ! --� - - -; -- -' - =---�'---1,_ ! j __ .i _.�....--� i -- � � -__.,-._ __i ---._—f_ —'T }.._.-r - I 1 � ---r -- 1 i---•�•—"- I � � 1 _.--�.__. _ 1 ! ; ! 1 i � i i � rt T y 1111 t S 41 .._ _T... . }.. Id i I i t 1 1 I' 1 i 1 i I - [ I + 1 } i i ' 1— i , . i _ t , i f I I 4.-1- 4-. -' i -t I— q i 1 1 I i t i ;---i,-- '' i I I 1 _ � ! 1 ! t ,- ` •._ I 1 1 i i _.� -. ------"1-. i 1- I i __ 1 4 1 1 j —• -4- i --+ —; 1 +— — s p---�- -- `---4 1 ;. -+-- 1 } ; ,.L..-.4 ,, a a s ' �_ r--!-----r--1---r-—. j— , i ! I 1_._ , • 1 - 1 • 1 I 1 i 1 � 4, 4- 4- 1 ;v 1 r 1 _ 1 i r ! j }---- i t ! i - 4 ! ! ' i 1 r i , 1 - t.._. 4 1 1 4 r - { F -� r i i � } --1 F j t , 1 . p 1- i + t-._ 1 t i •__ i ----,----4--- 1 1 ; { 1 -4---t---!-- i -_. -1 5+00. • 1 i i I i i i —'t—_? --_A—.4 t ____ - •-_«•_, ._—_. St i 1 1— -- 1 ---4-----tI d----4_ — i -r31--4;_} I. , II It • i ! f -i_ i f 1 f Donohue Engineers & Architects CLIENT PROJECT NO. BY PROJECT Y°6"kCC- -atz.t1 DATE PAGE NO. _5 C3 . 1 i • -„. I , ' I : '..t, I t ?:-. -r- I , I 4 . ,---_, 1 • . . ' . : . . . „ . , - ;, tOr. i ....'' „,.. i 1 -1- ' • . -:--- • ! - 7------T---T----r---1"---7 . .. " ' 1 . .., - 1 , -i. . , i i i , . ' ---1,-- ; -tr"."-T-1 _- ,. • ---- 1 411 t i t ' ' . : -i.----'---11- '''• ! 4- i 4: ,4 i- , f--- -r-7-T-r-T- 1 - --T--- 1 t• t 1 , 1_ .4_ 4--) -1- ' 1 : . t_ . 1 I -4--- i t ...— 1 1- ---1- ! ; 1 1 • : ' , I t . 1, i ; , I ; 1 •-t---4- '''t . ''. f ' t ! 1 1 I 1 1 , 1 • , ::::--1-----1- - - -I- ----1-- - I- -",---- 1 4 . • . 1 1 I i - • ; : I 4 • _4_ t _..4._ i ; ; . _ ,- . ...............„,„..00011,1 I , .-. .......---. 1.----1---+ - ses"." ,___4 4 / '' i L ! 4 !----- ' 1 I 1- : I L_ • , • i'• • 1 4 r , I .._i_ 1 , - , 1 I .......4"......_ 1 1.. 1 -a ...4. I t 1 I I i - t t- ----t . ' I ! 14, t L - 1 1 r 'I- 1 , I --1 -"r "--1— 1 1 t. --I--- - I --- 1 1, „..........). ; ,. 1, 1 : ! 1 i . ' , : --- -- .t .,....._. .;. ....... - - ; ; --- ___. — . . 1 t . — -- • ,----i-- , , , L _ • i I . , 1 - . ! , ..... -4-- LEVALklits14t .- 4— : ---1-/ ! ; 1-- . , . —r---,---1.- . ---:- , • 1 i 1 [ I , ;;;;;_, i• i, ...i___ ———___._. 1 , . , I , 1 1 — . L . L t t 1 , I 1 : • I 1 4 i. r 1: , i , •'!"'"--"--4- I I __Li i - P t t 4 1 , 1 ;__ 1 • -•,•,i, r ----,.---r— I 1 1 --t- I : ----1----4- -i I I -I— 1 1 i -f11 -I- ---t- • -I--- ',.- t , : -:- --*- i t 7 1- --; -- --4- ' I 4 • . • 1 1- -1-j _i. 1- i r 1 , , —4--t—ri--- i i I 1 ,,I 14 i • 1 • 1 ' ; - i 4--.....; ; -4- I- ---+ ----'-i tti 14- , , . • 4- 1 I 12" I —1-• I ! li , ' -7 --i--- 1 i , , .--......!.........i... . , . , ! i i I , ,----"-, -- , : '1— i , ii !!I I L 1 1 , --T .1_,......_.A, 41 ' I I 4 f.--. ................--,....- I ---.4--. , , --I.— - –4--, 1 .—t-- i 1 1 i 1 r 4-- I A-- ---- , I i • ---1*-,- I '4 1i li s • . +- 111 1 i -4 I II i i —I-- i i! r- - 4 4 •••••1 1••••• 41- 1•• '.IIII 1 ; 1 111 a 111111 1 111 111 1--- 1 1 i I , -1- I 1 1 I -I 7 , 1----, 1 , , -t--, i - - - - --1 LL ' i 1 -1 - 4/ 1 1 I -1---- 1 i ....___ i . 1 1 I , 1 1---.4•– 1 1 . j,,, ! i - ! , ..,____1 • • , . : 4-- ''' 1 4 , . ._....,_. , i -t---"-„;, . , 1 • , , 1 i il : • 1 i it :1: I i _,... a. t .1 •-• --',. 1• • 4_ .I.L. ir.,_, 4 I --'•-•-- ‘,I _____. 1 -i ,, . , ..— • I _l.., __[...., , 1 : t -r—• 1 t _ ..i.. ::::: i • 1 I - 4 1 -I 1 1 1 • . j - s 1 I s f"- I i --- . 1, _,,,___ -- ! 'r 1_ 1. __.4............4.............i...,....– ! A r „ '-` 1 ! 1 1 i• 1 1 _L—r—r--7-1 _11_, t –• 1,;.1ii .-1-. . _. . ... ,,--- n't. i -1-1E ,;,.:, 1 . ' • , ___,_ .1—.,_ ---.4. : L ' • -!.. 1 i :III' ii.,,t. • .-i-- Jr- 4 t , • ' t , . t . ' ' t i • 4 i i , ' . ' --1 1 , 1 . t t , 1 . , I ,. ..., .. 1-• 4--- .- -. . • : ! . . t . ...,- . i • ...,.... ..,..,, 4 .O -....-...-..t..-..---4--.......,...-... . '. - • -L.- t.. ,.... ; i I ' • ? It t I . 4-...t-,......... tr, . ...z — t . . 1 • : / , • .....;^ 44„ . - . , . : : 1 J • • ,, . • r ' ; 'ts t- -----.. • - La ; t'^'-' • • ; • • , • a. • IITT 3 ; . • • t 1 / • cxt--5-6 -/-/ ; i-/4--- - - _ I , . , , , ' - -• . I r _-------------: 1 . 2-e..,!--1.., ..c 1 / __,„___t_._ -I— . ! i i .::, i •-:.. '-' •••FT4'`••*•-' ' I , " I :. . : , 1 t 1 - 7+ 0+ 0 ' " ..,_ ------- -----'------‘ -- • : 1 c : ' ; i - / . t' ...t 1i;,' ..,1•. ____.,,;., ' I.• ;, .i,I •; . _T!.,I __ ,„. • i.: I'11•. !;;; ' '. .'.. i1 - 1 't 4It!I!1 - .-----4 —'i• ----....1tiI•47.- -- i1'•,: ----tt:- ----1-....-ri---- t- ,.-;.'I.•..•-i,'- °1,4t,i.1. , i11. 1 1.•• ,1 1 _ 1 -r1, -r --11,.- t1-Ki1 tI' 1If'!.er-,!,o .!tt1!' • r 1 ; 1 ,• - ; 1 . ' -4 , •:;'. 1 ii4iii iii • . 4 .._ _____-_—____...- : ----- ---11-4 ti)!!.: • ; i • : • • 4 • - - • . ' ' • t . , • ; 1 i • CLIENT_ PROJECT NO. BY . ~� Engineers & Architects PROJECT10410 ---.- �». DATE . ' / ^ ' ' , ,,. . v L! . .. ' ' ' ''' . LL�||._-__i_ [_. tt _ i_ -__�_� -. |•i- (, /` 'L| / / | _ '-4 / � |' ' ^! ' ' _l � | � | _� |]_}_�_� � | 1 | | | � | � � � | | | � ! i | 7—` �i | ! | | | ! |i'� ! i | / ' ` | i i ! ! ( ! | || / / | > / / / � � | | / ! � ! ! ' ' | -| i! ` '-'��-i� . . . •. . . . . . . . . . -' . . . .` . ' . � F--�- /--- -- ' 1 —� | � ' ' L_ | i / ��~�-��_| . | ! __ | ' | � | \ | 1 i | | | | ! | | ��.��~-�-^ �, ' / '/ ! \ � | | |] | � i | | i ! | 1-1' | L! _� � i | | � -7-1- -T1 1 1 � | | �| |-�! /� fL 5 . . /.. . � /. . ; . .. _~ _^___�__L_� -4 -L , —4 -- c�| | / � i / T' -' / /. . .i `|-' -f|r|' -i / | / / ` �|i . / ) -T' i / rT -.-� T| r.... i ,�i | / |� I [_ ! | ! •r__ | �J •-1•••, t-- � j t � _ / . / . / , ' / '� / / / / / /� ' . / / ~ '�. ,.........1.---i -.1.- �--�� . i !' ! , | �' i . ! | ! . ! . | / | ^ �! i | . | i__41 . . . | 1, . . . . ,/ . 1 . . . ' . . i | ^_� L_� i 3 | ` ! ! 1 | ) i | | |/ / | / ; ! ! / | / � L | /� | � |r�__|1 | | • . // . � / / , . ' . . . . !-+ 'f � :i / | i 1 ^-( | ! /, ( -f' 1 ' 1 ' . || / ! / '' --i ! '---; '-+ ' 3 • � � e3 ` /.. ti ,| .L- . , . ! i | / L_+ / l_f_ I � '| | PAGE NO. ' --- -T � | | -+--f-' ----� �-� 4 t r -,- ! Le^/.c. : —+ I _/ - � _ ~�- -�----[+^/ -- { �'' . ' ' . . . �_' _ � ` / ' . . �. �. . '. . . / . . . | ` |Ti . ' i • ! i • >/ | ' ; . / • . • . . �|'. . - '.. / . t+— ~---- ' —--( { ' | i ' ��i i . ' / : ! • f -�i-. ! > ; . |vl' 2.174, /. .� � . 3 � . '. / . |ii . / / `' ' . . �'. ' � ' . ,3 'T 3._ • | ! •} i / 3 • -^ 4-- ' . / , .i. Y�U�,L�___�7� i ^ � . ' .i.' . . . | �', | | i | i 1 ! / 3 -�/ ' ' ^ � � .\ !] i || ' | � | | | ! ��-��-�� ' i ! ' ' •| | / / | i , . ) -ti ' '�- / / / 3 / | • . / ��i. .-�� ' / 1 . . . . .. ^ . � •. . . . . .. . . . . . 34.^- ' ' ' 3. } . i -4__--f__ . | / -- . r.rrr�-�' . � �r / �.�—` ' , . ' ` 3 ` Donohue Engineers & Architects ( " 1 I T : iil 1 .......-„...—....4... i , • . -,---,...---, i , I , i I i ' , 1 1 ; , ' ' ! I ' I ' 4 I 3 f , I , f - ,..-- --;,- ------t --r-- i f 1 : -177 ; • • '; 1 • , ( , . .1___ L..__,___. ....._ . , ._.... ; , . .. ! • • 1 • ; , I 1 - 4- . 1: , , i . • .,11 -' -- 1 I 1 i, 11 • , , • . , , : a • T I I I' i ' i - 4 1 -I • ''' ". 4- :: .. 4 4-7+— : 4: ; ''' t 4 1- 1 -i--- - . 1 • 1 4 --1- 1---"-t . ; ! . : i 1 ! - . • . . I „_ • 1 . a • ....---- --- 4--- I -1--- 1 i --1- ; I "1- -1— i . '4.- --.- rt -:---.” T i ; • , : t , :11,', : IT 1 1 i ' 1 ; ' '' , 1 • ,.. • 1 i - • , , tan. ..-...... 1 1 . 1 1 1 , , 1 11 -1---H -....-1 — —4 —r I ! I 1 I - ) ii"i:ii 1 . ,,--.—.___{-_ _..4.. ' 1 f , .....i i, .1„__ : 3..;______, 2p __T_______ 1 1 3 , • 1.11! , , • 1 I 1 ! • • - : ' L - ; 11, i! ; , • 11111!1 1... ;___ • r t 4 • --I- ; I i i 1 III i I 1 1 1 1 p,...........- ......i. i I 1 i I i CLIENT E4b3 PROJECT YADctIoLclz.v. PROJECT NO. BY DATE PAGE NO. 7ct3 i • 1 i I- 1 f - I. -J- ! I 1 oe 11 1 4 t 4 I , i I i 1 1 i , ' I 1 L • i ': I 1 1 ! ' j • i , I 14 1 170 LH! -i- , 1 i 1 1 5. 1 1 , 3.._ 1 I ! , 1 = , , 1 . 1 i 1 ) ; ., 1 , r _i. _i ._.1 {-1 i . .. 4 , _.• i 4 " I , I - -1- i 1 • I +.--- : ! I 1* i .-....1... 1 1 .1 I 4 -..'f 1 I 1 ; 1 4 1— , : • 4 1 I $ • r ..........„.„,........t, ! - „,,,;,..........t............_.—.1_ .!,....... 1. 1 . 1 I i 1 1 • '1 1 ....,...........4.—.,....................—,.... I` —1-- ' ; 4. 1 : t I 4! 1 1 '. 1 T • -1 ' ' -7 t 1,11 1 ; 1- 1.- i 3, t I i I / 1 ; ! 1 ' . • i I 1 : 1 i 1 1 ; . 1 . ; : ..f. ..J.. 41 1 1 i_ , J,. - , i • • I i 4- r -T----1- ---t-----,_ -i i 4, ; i , , 1 i ; 1 - • ......_-__-_-_-4"-__.. ,_....1........._,... _., 1 __.t.. ,...... ;_....._ ! _...i. 1.... . ' . L .. ; 1 i . I j 4 ' 1 ; . i I i• , ; I ' —*. N...........4.___;,.....,..,......._......_ - , - 1 • ! ' , ! ! • 4 • --r- t -r- •-•1 I 1 1 Ir1tti TT ..,.._ - , i..... .,__..1 1, t l• i ---!-- k ' 1 i a: . . • I • 4 4 1 Fi S'er7o 1. -a-- --Y. M1tZ • 29 -- 4- a • ^ •-.- --V 1 1 • • ; 1 • 1 ! i ' 1..Q.E...w,a5.. 1-7 --t----- : - . , . . . 1 , -.. • i ' - • 3 • , 7 1 i I .---• • . . , - _ .-- •••• _ ; ,2,•__ ___ --.,.-- -• leaanmd,,a...., 1 I ' , I I --1!: 1,., : 11 ;1, 1I•_ '—;. :. .--1a —‘--. :fI '-- i. 1 i!1iI.----iir• -- , i1 1, 1i1i , 4 1 ; 1 - i !-- 1— H•. i.', I;! . . , - I ; - , i ! .........._ , , • , 1 4,1 Donohue En ineers & Architects CLIENT PROJECT PROJECT NO. BY DATE PAGE NO. • ' }_ __, -, . i....................,..............., , .-V. : ...* ' . ...........4... .....,..•.......-....,---., ..,..........4....-.. • , , . ; , . • t ' ; ; , ; ! - . , t I ; , • • , -,- . .. . . . . , -.4-- _ - , _ ......,......- . ; 4.. ;,.... 7 --.. ---.... .;•-•.- -,. ----: 4-..--------4- ,-- ...,-..-.._, .....„4--.-• -,........7. , t 1 . , • , I ' 1 t I 1 f • . : , , . , , • „ , '. : , ......,_ • ......... .............___;_ - . . • • 71.' i , , .... - I 4 ' r . ;, 1 ,TrT I , . -I- • - I ii -r ----t : - ----* ; __________„___,____,_____:__:___ 1 . _i_ '-'' I 1 1- I I 4 . t t ' ' I 1 i------ 4- - -, 1 .1 I ; -.1-! ,.--1, I ! . ,,.....– 1 ; li 1 T- I 1 i ___t_ 4 i ---1-----i _.__ ___ i 4 .;', L i• , . t . , , , , ! -I- I 4-- 1. " 1 ! : , ..___1.' 1 1 -I- f 1 I 1 1 1-- f. -+ I 1 , 11111111111.11111111 10E1 Win RE ! ; I 1 - ,., ! 1 I , I._ i -4 .I I ! - 1 i ' ..,._ i 1 --,-- • ,, r -I , -1- --1- , , -,-- ' , • , i. i , -1-• 1 • t 4--- - .I. 1 1 i r ______,_, , i , 1 [ 1 1 i -10ffraP$4,- ;,1-- 4 • 0' ', L _ -..-1-..---.-..• I ,,,..... L .t. -11 i _._.1 L i -r--r— I -1 I 1 tali ,.. t -i , , I ,- _I . I '', I ; 4- 1 --,',-- 1 i I 1 r 7 ±-7-71 [ 1 i 1 I , 1 1 1 -1 -r , ; i l'o+,$o 1- I 1 ___,... 1 I t i- i :.; LI__ ,„...,,.. 1 Ili I- mil • I , I 1 ! i 1 _i I I EMMEN E ME 11111 11011 11 1 - --14L . 1 t i I i I, I I , • i il 1M i 1 , I ! 1 i 1 1 i , I- _ ' I r _4_4_........„..., I - i .t. i i --imi 1 - ' .'"-- -I- 'T ! I ; ---i.--r-' .f i 1 ; I I -4 1- ' - - i- -- 4Ii - i ,. i-- I- ; . I ' ; ' . ! 1 i ; i J., ' I 1- i ---t- -I- .1---Isa 1 • 1 • r-- i i ' -, I , • r---. r - f I 1 , 1 I . I 4--- --t- 1 4- 1 1 ____...,............, 1 ---V- ...t. . i J , -- ..,,,_ -t I ---4-------.---f--e--4---'.---;- 4- i t- 4- -...--- ! ! • 1 ' 1- - .-/ --/: i - 1. i"----1-± ' • I 1 --4-- ----t-i---.----.- -..--..-.. I I- ..t._ --i,---.--; -r- __.. . , 4._ ;•. 1 I I ""-- ', ' 1 , 1 + 4- -i• I 4 -t — __ i ' . 1 ' ,-----t. ,--. ....,...,• _ I- '. i 4 1 I 1 4 , L ..1,. • 1-. ' • 71- " __,_ r4t41-t ., ... - ' s • ..-.., , , - 7 --.7....--, -Tro.........•••••*......1 1. It ...,.„„_, . •-',.- - : _4. . ,m1.- . .1, ,... . 4----•- . , ! ,.. : -- . -., • ' }_ __, -, . i....................,..............., , .-V. : ...* ' . ...........4... .....,..•.......-....,---., ..,..........4....-.. • , , . ; , . • t ' ; ; , ; ! - . , t I ; , • • , -,- . .. . . . . , -.4-- _ - , _ ......,......- . ; 4.. ;,.... 7 --.. ---.... .;•-•.- -,. ----: 4-..--------4- ,-- ...,-..-.._, .....„4--.-• -,........7. , t 1 . , • , I ' 1 t I 1 f • . : , , . , , • „ , '. : , ......,_ • ......... .............___;_ - . . • • Donohue Engineers & Architects CLIENT PROJECT PROJECT NO. BY DATE.. PAGE NO. • ; 7 E ; T- --1 . --. : -j---4- -:—"T- - : , i - ' -; . 7,— - TT•T T: 1 T— 7 --F- 1---1--7---i , 1 I I ,' I f. 1-.:01 I I, LI% 1,..) -!.:- ; ; ` i ;— 3- •., -Sr r ; , 1 i 1 I T '. ' \AJ i t7r H ; -.' --V- -r 7 7.--r— I 1 I ' i ± i i H ---f---11.-- ' L....... ,.. 1 -, f ,,-. ; , 1 i i -; 1 L:_t-1!4•i a V i 11 .TTT 4. ; ' , 1 , , -1. ! 1 _,._ ., ; .1 - - ,0g)N1 , . • t.,:m;74, % , i -I 1,- --4-- , j. I.< . 1 _ -.I. 5 I 4 —1,—..„--1.----i-. - i .---I- 7 II . 1---- ; { ; ' II: • - ' ; 'It.' 1111 '.;- 41; .4 4 . !'; i , 4': i .; I ' . , . , , 1 Y I (4J 4 ,n, i • : 'il 1 1 ' ; 1 -(0,-/-1:); „,. : 1 i -'.-- * '-' 1- I ---",•1 : ,Ca i --._i.5104-; 1 -.', :70. I- r i-- ' i I ! - 4...i.• I II -----. --, ._.1.._f___. /l , , , ------ , I i ___,_ ____i. I. ,-1- f- ----I-- 1 .2:2-3-- • • , I j : , t... i- t--- . ----- • , , 1 ., i 1 , .....4_ .4........._ _ 1 1 II Ir'''' , ; ' 11 3 I 611 i 1 I 1 zez:, , ,---6- .,_ , , 1 '-T 1 , i r I i i . l... --r-- ! - • i H . ' ! 1 ! ,. •./..._Y -Lo. ____L__ ....._A. -7 111 • I ,_ . -I- I T 1 1 , - • , l -,,- -I- i t 1 .1 1) I 1 1 __L Zt--I _ +............ -4--- x 4. f- ..... 1-444 i . ' a• , 1 . ! ,_____. i/o -t-f 7-i . cto -1 --i 1.. I .;,.... • _.... _1 (4> .1. - —1— : r —I— 1---r—r- ..- , • - 1 1 ... . . .., aji 11 gra Mil ; 1 1 i ; i 1 . ; • i. -41,- I 1 2, 11- 1111 I .i- . 1 , 1 1 i Ai -.1. --1 __l_ ..4... -.1-- 1 ' 1 ;iii 1 1 -r •11 t' • ET -I i i ............/.....t.....4...........,. -4,----i...._ ; 1 1 j 1E 1 ' I ;.----- 1 1 FY ' i' ----- .....Z..4.. - 1 ! : , ,• . I . J_____ tIL -45. I T•T 1 --•Ef - J - 7 .t- ; ___ ; 1_ 1_ i____t___I_ZIL.,_r_>___<1„.2:2, T1,!;Fili1,1, 1 1 , . . . 1 ; 1 .- 4- ___,....____ _ 4 ,; 4... - i ___18 , • , 1 r .1- I 1 .._;..-----4.--3----- 1 , r r • I I ; • ,I;ii ' it- 1-f :2,,,.0 ; 1 : ; • 4-- -;.-- , , - - ,, -1- , ; ; 1 . I i i ; : i 7 .1 i • ; 1 .i(42 I : Ki . ; ) ---k .....,.._,..4 `." ''," "" •• • . . • . • 1212.1-2 , n ; : i ; n . ; 4' • • . 7 -I 1 ' : ! , , ---r- ' + 1 -- • .._-_"..........,............... • : : n i . • • : ;• 3 7-1 I i i -4 ' • ; " -7----- f ' • • ... --. • ; . 1 ; ''•• 1 ' ' • • 2 • E--, --‘• -;---- ., ,,•,„, " ' T -4------; - , L .-......_ 1 __I...4_ 1 1 f-_ ..-____,_ . : - ...._. : -J.- I- - .._ .•, ,_.. ---r.- . - ' . ...... T , : : • . , ; 4. ..____. 44.4•4 -4 -4* -..•‹) 71:;540i )C) Z'C' 7 • (4? ) :I 7-- L.3 .08 •4414-• • - " •N -m44;4. _ 1....___.. _72-- -=,.._ .............— . 91M 2. - — CD ÷ i2-tZ . . . ... - ...t. ...,___ . . ; 1.__Lay.1ct; 4,;__..............________' ..._..... ' ..1._. i .• . , 4 , i -I ; 4 : i ; • I 1- . • ; ; ............ . r .........4.- --7 • 9-0-6<i) E ; , 9- ( • 94-410 I . I f* I -' ; - E' 1 i ! ;. •••-• •'- ! • ; I i1 l l ;•i: 4 1i;l -i;i. 4;I•1_' 1•i• i2i'. .-Er1 -1 i Ti11 _, 11 4 _1Alf_i i 1EI---:-7•1- -41I;' 1 I':.:•i1: -Ii.ti: II; -mn;•i!, - 1 i1 -I 1 )C•B1 1 -4 -ji— --4-t----1-7-t--1 -E 4 4 1;I:•I.. . . ,1 . , • , —1--, — ---. iII -----'1 1 ''' L i 2,C, 4- 2,0 t r I 4 • ; • I • I I : ! : L3 (Y2:.• 4'y 1 t : _ • ) 4 • II ; I ; • 1; 4- - ! Donohue CLIENT PROJECTYAAkeE altd)LE -RD . PROJECT.NO. 112-066 BY DATE PAGE NO. I 8 1 • r 1 , ; i 1 --I-----1---;- I ; I -I -4 ' / 4 -, "r------' I 1 i l' -r- 1 • , • 1 • , 4 r- 4 • , 11- ...._.L. I-- ; I- - 1 i ----f ...k...______ ---4' - 7- i -t----1-- ' ' - 4 .1_._ fl -1 I i 1 1- , , .1_ _ !.. , 1 ' ; 1 i -1-71-11-7- - -- ; -----r- T-1- I ; , I - : --1-1--- - . _ JIM= • MOM 1111 I 1 i Li 1 -1-- 1 -1 1 i. __,.... ; —*-... -- • I ; I ' t ---- ; -1' •-• I ; : I I --;- 4 4- ' 1 - I i 1 i 1 i I i .. --, i ; i ; I , --4- 4. --f— ' ! r . , — gb 411 -- .1 1 "*Allestoc4,01 11a. a 1 NM I I I 1 -- --; 1 11111 .1- • 1 . ---,-- --------- 1 I , I • 1 r ; , 7-114111411,141 f I -"4119 likkil 111410114 „... - i I 411-11 . %,, 1 _ 11111EN M111111.11 . .. • i 4 --,--...........1._÷..., 1- 1-- 1 . i 1 1 I I - i 1 IF 1 1 ; 1 tA I 1..L. .. 5511111111111 MM 110111111 IIIII MINI I RI 4----• , I L- ___1_ ! I I_ , I _I , i , . 1 ---1-- I , 1 r 1 . 1 t 'F--,---t----4--i- ,.... • -4- 1 i _4, ; -1"-- 1 , , , i 4 • i 1 , , 1 i 1 , , g i , , . , , 't ' 1 ' 1 I • ii• ; •1 . ii iii ili --f- ; il r , . i__ . , , , .. , , •: -f- , -1 , , , , ,,,j,, - ; I i 1 I : L T . , ,---,--• , : I I ' , : : 1 , i • • ,:' --- : i . • ' 1,11!, 1 • ;-„1,,,!,: • " -!: . r 1 -------r • 1 i - t1 -i- •;- i- • • 411- i;•, . , 4-4.1ii I ,..---_• -;,•_• ,- ..,,,;.•;;•- -'.-• 1 . , . , , F- i• ---; - -4,t, • • • 1 1 + 1 •• -; - ; - 1 , ; ----; --i ; - . . 4--- '''''.'7 - • L . . ... _ -4 -- : . , , - • I • ; • _......._r.,....t......__ ........ ...._. _,...._ ...,.....„...„.... ............;_, . . • . 1 ; - 4 • • i- , -s ; ; —1, ....„.._, i I- „,......... ...._*.......1..-r..., .....1......_ ___ ,.... _..... _.......4___;...•__i_...._•:_____•. • _..... •_.;_____ • • ; • ; I • ; . _._ __. .....-..—.. ...-........ ,... - „ ....-ti. / ti 1 k Lft • • ' • -,.......- • . • 1 ! i • i.__4. ___f___i__ . 1 . i 7 i • 7 .! i t , . . , . : ; i ,..,, ,i ! li .,, i i ! . . A1 , .1_.___ s!, , ; 7------1-• I • 1 ; ; ! : ; : 1.1 - , • : .____,...... 1....____,,.. ; : 4. : • : , ; , t • 1 . i -, • • :, i 1 : ; i . ; . ; i .m.d0,10140! /12 s , -4- : -4-- • - TT; . I i 1 i ! • '. , . ; , . 4 ; I , 1 • " 1 . . , .;,. (..-'"ti I I; ,-•,.., „,_ 1 j I 1 1 1 1 ! I __I_ L__ 4 ; I I I 1 1 r i• !, .,; -1 1-1; •••• 4 --I-- ! ! : 1 r1 4 ,,, -1--1. I 111 1- I i ! i 1 I i - I 1, • 1 ! I 1 ' ' 1 -1-1-7-1-7----7-7--7--1.--7----±-: ---'----t-1--r A.._......., '____i • ; I ; -- ; , I , •- ; ; I ; 1 1 , 4- : . .1;1•,• 1 _ 1 ; --- --4 ; ! • , .._.ii,i'-,,,, --,-- , -4. 1. .4-- -4- • -i- ; ---;•-• •r • I , , ; --r-, --7.. ___.:._._4...._-;-..„....._i__...1....... ; _ I i 1 1 I 7-4 1,i1l,.t ----j•1i I. :i-1 1 lHl irl 7” -L - 1 :T- 1 . 4- • -- ---- -11-- -H-iL1-1--41 !411il__1_,:_ : I t SLIDE PRESENTATION SIBLEY TERMINAL INDUSTRIAL PARK 1 - This is a view of Yankee Doodle Road, looking towards Sibley Highway - note the serious alligator cracking and deterioration of the street section. This deterioration continues throughout the sag point in this segment of roadway. This deterioration will be repaired through reconstruction of a section of Yankee Doodle Road. Storm drainage improvements will also be implemented along this vertical curve to remove drainage from the roadway and route it beneath the surface. t u. ; w-ef4he-eraeleingrpotholing=arid-attempts repairs tthat the-eity-has comnleta in an effort to extendthe life -of -the Foadwar 3 - This view shows Yankee Doodle Road toward the west. The condition here is not as bad as that in the sag point; however, you may still note the cracking within the roadway. ( • 4 - This slide shows the intersection of Yankee Doodle Road and Terminal Drive. The cracking pavement distress noted here will be repaired by reconstructing this intersection. • -5 --Again--atxhe-same.-intersection,F,.:wouldanticipate4he'installationpof catch basins'at- this i„te,,, P n.-sur£ace..:drainageasheeting,across-the..intersection. 6�-- ,, is -a- typical�dr vev y�entrance -in .the development. -A11--driveway entrances • that do -reGQnc .ted, 7 - This view shows Terminal Drive looking north from about the top of the hill. This section of roadway will require milling to alleviate the potential problems the cracking could cause if it were simply overlaid. A 8 - Here is aiikAlter driveway entrance, also note the sunken concrete curb and gutter on this side of the driveway. 9 - This slide presents the a typical area of alligator cracking in the area between Yankee Doodle Road and the sag point in the long vertical curve( is -is the l catch,basins»at the.sag= pointf -3t-would-appear slide that -the addition: of. catch basins- on- the cent -legs -=of *the-vertieal.ourve.woul basins_currentlydrain andeliminate-the ponding -and sedimentation thaLoccurs-hereve • ,1i_ This slide was taken looking south across the sag point on Terminal Drive. In the center of the slide, you see a large area of bituminous patch. This area shows a rather large amount of settlement and pavement deflection and will require some pecolastrustiear rapt;+- • • 12 - Here is another driveway entrance that will require reconstruction to meet the City Standard design. A13- Here is another driveway entrance that will require reconstruction to meet the City Standard design. X( 14 - This slide show Terminal Drive looking north at the bend in the roadway. In this slide you can see the sunken sections of curb and gutter and its effect on the storm drainage. The storm sewer in this area will not be altered as it is currently adequate; however, the repairs to the curb and gutter will improve the drainage from the roadway. en -tether• -north -than. e.previous-slide- to-again<.:show-the-s en, ub )16 - This slide shows the initial stages of alligator cracking that would be repaired through milling and overlaying the pavement on Terminal Drive )4,17 - This is Terminal Drive from Sibley Highway. Again, this section is in fair condition and overlaying the pavement will provide structural stability to prolong the life of the street. 18 - Here is another driveway entrance that will require modification or reconstruction. Also note the alligator cracks forming in the street. 1 nor- 1riveway entrance' x 20 - The concrete curb and gutter ends approximately 150 feet from the intersection. Curb and gutter would be extended to the intersection during the project. 21 - This slide shows a localized area of pavement distress at the intersection of Terminal Drive and Sibley Highway )1-22 - Again at the intersection of Terminal Drive and Sibley Highway, this slide shows both the pavement issues and the need for ditch grading and a new culvert to improve the flow of drainage along Sibley Highway. Catch basins will also be installed in this area to remove surface drainage from the intersection. • • • DRIVEWAY REPAIRS EXHIBIT 9 - DRIVEWAY REPAIR SUMMARY Location (Address or parcel location) Existing Condition Proposed Improvement 1. Eagan Trucking - North Side Terminal Drive, just west of TH 13. 3131 Highway 13. Driveways into parcel being used with no standard curb opening or aprons. Install standard driveway entrances. 2. 3420 Terminal (Production Parts) Two existing non-standard driveways, one with bituminous ramp in gutterline, both with drop curb, no aprons on radii, ruts in radii. Install two standard driveway entrances to match existing widths. 3. 3259 Terminal Driveway lacks radii and apron, large boulders used for edge control, ruts evident. Replace with standard driveway entrance to match existing. 4. Three driveways on lot line between 3259 Terminal and vacant parcel to south with access to Aagard parcel. Two driveway openings created by breaking off back of curb, no curb openings or apron. Being driven over with no entrance (southerly driveway). Install three standard driveway openings. 5. Vacant parcel across street from 3291 Terminal (east side) Existing driveway into parcel has no curb opening, driving over curb. Install standard driveway opening to match existing driveway. 6. 3291 Terminal (south driveway) Driveway with drop in curb bituminous paving, deteriorated at radii. Install concrete curb and apron to match existing. 7. 3337 Terminal Driveway lacks curb on north side for edge control. Install curb on north side of driveway. 8. 1745 Yankee Doodle (Best Brands) Existing two driveways just east and west of Yankee Drive. Curb shows some cracking and settlement. Gutter for easterly driveway deteriorated. Install standard driveway entrances in reconstruction area for two driveways. FEAS-112.005 -16- • y 3 VACANT ,s SAFETY KLEEN 3227 4 1 3195 2 EAGAN TRANSPORTATI & TRUCKING 1 ®,,w0 x 112.5 x 414 to VACANT BACNMANS 3245 5 6 2 DIESEL SERVICE 3207 HWY 13 3220 HOLMAN ERECTION 2 3240 PRODUCTION PARTS 4 3256 7 VACANT VACAN T PROPOSED MILL AND OVERLAY )( ACCEPTABLE ENTRANCE • REQUIRE NEW DRIVEWAY ENTRANCE DRIVEWAYS REQUIRE REPLACEMENT OR MODIFICATION 1St cam MOBS ea005ex SIBLEY TERLINAL INDUSTRIAL PARK cflY OF EAGAN PROJ. NO. 661 ST ET 11/PRO DONT 3 city OF QagC111 • • ti 4 9 7 VACANT x 3291 AAGieD VACANT 4 6 7 VACANT 3303 VACANT ti 10 ti x 3220 MCKAYS 8 ti X 3332-34 Ec35( 11 x 3337 PROPOSED MILL AND OVERLAY METE DMZ eagTERM 1767 HORIZON 9 EQUIPMENT SB Y TERLINAL INDUSTRIAL. IAL PARK am OF EAGAN PROJ. NO. 661 STREET IuPROVEMBITB X ACCEPTABLE ENTRANCE REQUIRE NEW DRIVEWAY ENTRANCE DRIVEWAYS REQUIRE REPLACEMENT OR MODIFICATION EMIT city of eegan • • VACANT O Z YANKEE DRIVE U YANKEE DOODLE ROAD 1771 11 1769 1767 9 TERMINAL DRIVE 10 BEST BRANDS 1765 1750 1 VALLEY LOUNGE STATE TRUNK HIGHWAY NO. 13 PROPOSED STREET RECONSTRUCTION r \% %'s PROPOSED MILL AND OVERLAY eagTERM SIBLEY TERMNAL INDUSTRIAL PARK CITY OF EAGAN PROS NO. 661 STREET 1MPRo t X ACCEPTABLE ENTRANCE • REQUIRE NEW DRIVEWAY ENTRANCE DRIVEWAYS REQUIRE REPLACEMENT OR MODIFICATION EXEUNT city of aagan Bca1- $��..�J ti 5 - STATE TRUNK HIGHWAY N0. 13 PROPOSED STREET RECONSTRUCTION MME PROPOSED MILL AND OVERLAY ACM DOME .agTERM • NE(,./ b/)ueti-�rSwce A DRIVEWAYS REQUIRE REPLACEMENT OR MODIFICATION SIBL Y TERMINAL INDUSTRIAL PAW aTY OF EAGAN PROL. NO. WI STENO EXHIBIT- city XHIBR city of actgan • � 4; T 4 t, 114(.4, 4- G,-c.c��dr+ 314 V4c_4,i Q+IAiw ea 3337 3337 ,, V4ctr.4- )§1ecar;Vtw c1,t4v,►•K 1e;N LAIR,' -4•- acc'J cow_ r+te 33z Si} f`%`v‘i, I j ;t "Pe %) 4 ° Cori . PROPOSED IAILL AND OVERLAY COMM ams 3 - 7 i a K. °''z coKe} tZas E a II'P h 4* Y711 SAY TERIANAL INDUSTRIAL PARK CITY OF EAGAN PROS. No. emi MEET IMPROVEMENTS • b".ti‘ ij RF --Q141 kJ Ew .pR Ivrw4- 1 cure DRIVEWAYS REQUIRE REPLACEMENT OR MODIFICATION DONT ©O -IT 3 ())ity oP =gm • 3tgs' 1 4 o yew 4. 3ZZ1 Ste( A 3.151 s. 2.c.r`.� 4t O . i. o t �„�cII3 r C'Mf ��,1uAjv( 9. iV C 3 7- - \-44 \r's `^0` SvcLk' -64 >4, "+i'`, "° d -•r M Now. 324 0 Q r e•k en tn- t4is uo f "y dle44`i o'••moi• :'i4C. i PROPOSED MILL AND OVERLAY 0 k, 3256 .. Orta ~ • N� E DRIVEWAYS REQUIRE REPLACEMENT OR MODIFICATION In� SIBLEY TERMINAL II1DUETRIAL PAW CITY OF EAGAN PAW. NO: 881 STREET IMPROVEMENTS :Tan )3city of c�Dc�c��n • 1 TERMINAL ROAD coHt". C(,•6 -G 1: • • 04! L CON C• d .:.,+r•• y)•• (-4• . B„.4 -o.k Z- 174 cr 41111111 STA,'_ �I;JNK HIGHWAY NO. 13 PROPOSED STREET F 7. . STRUCTION PROPOSED MILL AND 'ERLAY . . . T c a . L —r COISEINCIRIEDS aTY OF EAGAN PRoo. No. 661 SWEET I4PROV DXIIIBIT 2 city of eagan eag005ex • PROPOSED. MILL AND OVERLAY MEW MOM eag005ex o) IDIHMIT 3 city of eagan T® PROPOSED MILL AND OVERLAY COMM eag005ex FOU; TIAL PAF CITY OF EAGAN PROD. NO. 661 STREET IMPROVBAENTS EXHIBIT city of gaga • • • ] 12-A9s�"' Yankee Doodle Road Construction Notice September 29, 1994 To: Businesses Located on Yankee Doodle Road, Terminal Drive and Yankee Drive Subj: Yankee Doodle Road Overlay Project This notice has been prepared to inform affected business owners of the pending construction that is scheduled to begin on Monday, October 3, 1994 on Yankee Doodle Road from Highway 13 to Terminal Drive. Weather permitting, the Contractor will be begin milling and removing portions of the existing bituminous roadway surface on Monday. Minor adjustments to the existing utilities and placement of a bituminous leveling course will follow, with paving of the new bituminous driving surface to be completed by Friday, October 7, 1994. While every attempt will be made to maintain traffic on Yankee Doodle Road during construction, it is suggested that Yankee Drive and Terminal Drive be utilized as much as possible to access your business location and/or Highway 13. This will help to minimize any inconvenience and short term traffic delays, and also enable the Contractor to complete this work in a timely manner. Your patience and cooperation in this matter are greatly appreciated. If you have any questions or concerns during construction, please contact the project inspector, Steve Bulle at one of the numbers listed below. Steve will be the most effective person to get questions answered quickly; however, if he cannot be reached, the Project Engineer and City of Eagan construction inspector are also listed for your convenience. Construction Area _4. On-site Inspector Steve Bulle 637-6102 (pager) 280-0786 (mobile) Project Engineer Greg Stonehouse 644-4389 City of Eagan Stan Lexvold 681-4643 Alternate Routes i ° J z, 0 WAT TREA /i, NE q, • G CONSULING aier ewar & Associa es CLIENT CONTRACTOR (PRIM TEMP. RANGE_____ PLAN SHEET STREET SN-WM-ST-FM SIZE -MATERIAL SOIL TYPE SPEC. GRAN. /SUB PROJEC WIND CLOUD COVER DAILY REPORT PAGE OF — / SMTWGTFS DATE SUPERINTENEN PRECIPITATION ROAD CONSTRUCTION PIPE PROGRESS END STA BEGIN STA LENGTH FOREMAN WORKERS START TIME END TIME COMMENTS: COMMENTS: W _ 111111111111110111111111 1111111111.111111.111111111111111111 N1111111111111111111111ININO..Miliall 111111111111111111111111 MIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIMMITIM1111 0111111111111111111111111 Mil VALVES. FITTINGS. HYDRANTS. MANHOLES AND CATCH BASINS Size TO - 2� TOTAL HOURS INSPECTION TIME _7_2_212_ INSPECTOR JOB NUMBER /7-Z - MILEAGE • aler CONSUOING ewar & Assoc's. es CLIENT PROJECT CONTRACTOR (PRIME SP 7— TEMP. TEMP. RANGE WIND CLOUD COVER DAILY REPORT PAGE --� -- OF SMTGITFS DATE o SUPERIN ' T PRECIPITATION ROAD CONSTRUCTION PIPE PROGRESS PLAN SHEET STREET SN-WM-ST-FM SIZE -MATERIAL SOIL TYPE SPEC. GRAN. END STA BEGIN STA LENGTH FOREMAN WORKERS START TIME END TIME COMMENTS: Adif COMMENTS: -11111111111.11111111111110111111111111 ININIIIIINIIIIIININ M11111111111111101111 - VALVES, FITTINGS, HYDRANTS, MANHOLES AND CATCH BASINS n th Size at L od TOTAL HOURS INSPECTION TIME %— TO �� /� INSPECTOR JOB NUMBER ' �z"O b MILEAGE ._ v_n..... - IngneCtor Alb 41 Ar CLIENT CONTRACTOR (PRIME TEMP. RANGE SCri -Q YND'2 tiler ewar CONSULTING a GI Associa es •c. PROJECT PIPE PROGRESS PLAN SHEET STREET SN-WM-ST-F SIZE -MATERIAL SOIL TYPE SPEC. GRAN. END STA BEGIN STA LENGTH FOREMAN WORKERS START TIME END TIME AFIWIFIrra CLOUD COVER DAILY REPORT PAGE OF DATE • Ar SMOTWTFS SUPERIN DENT � -_ PRECIPITATION ROAD CONSTRUCTION JGR •ww �� SIZE -TYPE IFNGTHCOM111111 �� cNn STA IMMIFIESM 111111111111111111111111 COMMENTS: "PP 400 4111, 111111111111111111111 11111111111111111111 MES 11111111111111111111111111 111111111111•1111111•1111 111111.0111 11110111111.11011 COMMENTS: VALVES, FITTINGS, HYDRANTS, MANHOLES AND CATCH BASINS Size D •th Type MINI Ame fir - Ager/ ..i7 2G 4 i). i4 -C 0 t/- J .00 70�- INSPECTION TIME ��____— TOTAL HOURS-�INSPECTOR JOB NUMBER /�-� a S = �� MILEAGE • i � 1NG Du:5 FAV J Maier Stewart & Associates Inc. DAILY REPORT PAGE / OF / CUENT�j CONTRACTOR (PRIM TEMP. RANGE,75 PROJECTfrKec.;g40- DAASr T W T F S SUPERIN ' ENT "475-,< WD'/ '5 -JOCLOUD COVER PRECIPITATION 7/ - PIPE PROGRESS SERVICES ROAD CONSTRUCTION STA IL - S1ZE—TYPE LENGTH MATERIAL CREW 1 CREW 2 PLAN SHEET / END STA BEGIN STA STREET,::EV./ ,4110 _,._ , SN— WM—ST—FLENGTH /,C iC in7 DEPTH x WIDTH SIZE—MATERIAL CALL QUANTITY SOIL TYPE USED QUANTITY SPEC. GRAN. YIELD= USED CAL.0 END STA fi COMMENTS: BEGIN STA VALVES, MANHOLES Station FITTINGS, AND CATCH Type HYDRANTS, BASINS D • th Size LENGTH FOREMAN WORKERS START TIME 7,•00 END TIME /= 3b xzci —p • /�cvZ �CISY iTd.Y� Clc_S %E7 ,4452vu c cX• S! rE . �^ 9 SJ� to QE Z / y1J �i DS c ski 0ll> •cErrOZ 4 75,902..S y INSPECTION TIME "7-00 TO '4%30 JOB NUMBER //2-0'05. ',1° MILEAGE fib INSPECTOR whit., - Office Yellow — Inspector TOTAL HOURS 61 lav dite• CONSVL1 NG ENGINEERS Maier Stewart & Associates Inc. DAILY REPORT PAGE / OF CLIENT 4-49-'4 PROJECT hJ«l DATE ll / CONTRACTOR (PRIME SUB) / o - a S SUPERINTENDENT o he SMTWTFS TEMP. RANGE WIND CLOUD COVER PRECIPITATION PIPE PROGRESS SERVICES ROAD CONSTRUCTION CREW 1 CREW 2 STA LA SIZE -TYPE LENGTH MATERIAL PLAN SHEET END STA STREET BEGIN STA SN-WM-ST-FM LENGTH SIZE -MATERIAL DEPTH x WIDTH SOIL TYPE CALC QUANTITY SPEC. GRAN. USED QUANTITY END STA YIELD= USEDXALC BEGIN STA COMMENTS: LENGTH FOREMAN VALVES, FITTINGS, HYDRANTS, MANHOLES AND CATCH BASINS WORKERS START TIME Station Type Depth Size END TIME COMMENTS: A lyyz� )-Z>9 INSPECTION TIME TO TOTAL HOURS JOB NUMBER MILEAGE INSPECTOR White — Office Yellow — Inspector siv CONSUL11NG aier ewar Assam. es DAILY REPORT PAGE OF____Z— CLIENT PROJEC �� DATES � MTWTFS CLIENT 79 SUPERIN DENTAE A-�< " ..- CONTRACTOR (PRIME/SUB) PRECIPITATION TEMP. RANGE ‘Zb 7�- WIND CLOUD COVER ROAD CONSTRUCTION PIPE PROGRESS PLAN SHEET STREET SN-WM-ST-F SIZE -MATERIAL SOIL TYPE SPEC. GRAN. END STA BEGIN STA LENGTH FOREMAN WORKERS START TIME END TIME 111111111111111111111 OMNI .-, IIIGAINI11111111 111111111111 1111111111111111111111111 111111111111 11111111111111 1111111111111 11111111111111 1111111111111 111111111111111111111 111111111111111111111111 111111111111111111111111011111111 i S COMMENTS: VALVES. FITTINGS, HYDRANTS. MANHOLES AND CATCH BASINS Station i �5: -.30 TOTAL HOURS INSPECTION TIME O c� TO n INSPECTOR JOB NUMBER //Z-°� '2° MILEAGE �-- _ Office Yellow — Inspector Type i D •th Size 444,0 CUENT CONTRACTOR (PRIME/SUB) TEMP. RANGE. 7° 7�9 aier ewar PLAN SHEET STREET SN -FNM -ST -FM SIZE -MATERIAL SOIL TYPE SPEC. GRAN. END STA BEGIN STA LENGTH FOREMAN WORKERS START TIME END TIME coNsuLrn+c & Associa es PROJECT WIND/14) /-S CLOUD COVER DAILY REPORT PAGE / Or DATE 9 9 SM TFS SUPERINTENDENT PRECIPITATION PIPE PROGRESS COMMENTS: • ROAD CONSTRUCTION -011111111.11111111110 111111111111111111011111111111111111111111 1111111MININII 111.111111111111110111 111111111111111111111111111 111111101111110111111111 1111111111111.111111111111111111111111111111111111111 111111111111111111111111 111111111111111.1111111111111111111111111111111111111 1111111111111111111 111111.1111 011111 DEPTH x WIDTH 1011111101.11111111111111.111 COMMENTS: VALVES, FITTINGS. HYDRANTS. MANHOLES AND CATCH BASINS 0 •th 7 INSPECTION TIME 70 TO 7-.7 . �a MILEAGE 22 JOB NUMBER //Z -c)435 or TOTAL HOURS .�� INSPECTORS ��. Size va, coNsuom aier ewar Associa es CIJENT � — PROJECT CONTRACTOR (PRIME /SUB) TEMP. RANGE ba WIND PLAN SHEET STREET SN—WM—ST—FM SIZE—MATERIAL SOIL TYPE SPEC. GRAN. END STA BEGIN STA LENGTH FOREMAN WORKERS START TIME END TIME ;v k" DAILY REPORT PAGE -- -= OF DATE 6` z? -5' S M T WOT F S SUPERINTENDENT CLOUD COVER PRECIPITATION _ ROAD CONSTRUCTION PIPE PROGRESS COMMENTS: 01111011011111111111111111111 __-- INSPECTION TIME c rte— TO l/' e,114-1 11 2— Ito MILEAGE 2-1)JOB NUMBER White — Office Yellow — Inspector COMMENTS: VALVES. FITTINGS, HYDRANTS, MANHOLES AND CATCH BASINS TOTAL HOURS Z INSPECTOR Size • • coNsuoING ss Maier Steuart & Associates Inc. 4-06 DAILY REPORT PAGE OF CUENT a h PROJECT oc) V6 DATE '6"/6-1111 S M T 11/(F S CONTRACTOR (PRIME/SUB) JY) n I\)2rn2r 2 SUPERINTENDENT TEMP. RANGE AO -$O WIND /0 CLOUD COVER d IGy -div PRECIPITATION — PIPE PROGRESS SERVICES ROAD CONSTRUCTION CREW 1 CREW 2 STA L/ SIZE -TYPE LENGTH MATERIAL PLAN SHEET END STA STREET BEGIN STA SN-WM-ST-FM LENGTH SIZE -MATERIAL DEPTH x WIDTH SOIL TYPE CALC QUANTITY SPEC. GRAN. USED QUANTITY END STA YIELD= USED/ALC BEGIN STA COMMENTS: LENGTH FOREMAN VALVES, FITTINGS, HYDRANTS, MANHOLES AND CATCH BASINS WORKERS START TIME Station Type Depth Size END TIME COMMENTS:', 2o / -r%E v/ --> y e vi,g y � SD n' E ��. a Lr E;' _s i» c Le'cv-A dh 7°'S N j .{ !1 61,- a, t �� J• - KlSd -}C� �0 1-"i/`Ii-Ah€jt Oki G/ S �L(�t�ylT L1 !<CCh �� /`;'� (/ ('Y/ 1/ (e//) -r- INSPECTION INSPECTION TIME ? I9/I TO TOTAL HOURS ( /0s - White JOB NUMBER //Z -'S - 9e)MILEAGE 5 7 INSPECTOR C lyd - (2 - Office Yellow - Inspector MSI CONSULTING ENGINEERS DAILY REPORT PAGE '� OF— CLIENT,r�' c:;.. -ii-n.) PROJECT, j�yJ'4- 6'5I -"c3,-5) DATE 6 �si- "� S M TOW CONTRACTOR lvyc.c/A-f - SUPERIN D �' T � B ) TEMP. RANGE WIND CLOUD COVER PRECIPITATION ROAD CONSTRUCTION PIPE PROGRESS CREW 1 1 SERVICES CREW 2 PLAN SHEET STREET SN—WM—ST—FM SIZE—MATERIAL SOIL TYPE SPEC. GRAN. END STA BEGIN STA LENGTH FOREMAN WORKERS START TIME END TIME STA Lf it SIZE -TYPE LENGTH MATERIAL END STA BEGIN STA LENGTH DEPTH x WIDTH CALC QUANTITY USED QUANTITY YIELD= USZD/ALc COMMENTS: VALVES. FlTTINGS, HYDRAN- MANHOLES AND CATCH BA: Station Type Death L5%T ��yiG — Lt`�i45c� of j��Jlz r INSPECTION TIME 8.0o TO moo? oa TOTAL HOURS JOB NUMBER //2-C )-5 1/O MILEAGE o2.5- INSPEC White — Offlce Yellow — Inspector • • • CON )LnNc ENGINSPRS Maier Stewart & Associates Inc. DAILY REPORT PAGE 1 OF CUENT F5 r. PROJECTC- L.) DATE 6- 9- SMT CONTRACTOR (PRIME/SUB) Me /CPQ» 8F SUPERINTENDENT(P TEMP. RANGE co - WSJ WIND -1 U CLOUD COVER 1)./1 y GA -y PRECIPITATION FS PIPE PROGRESS SERVICES ROAD CONSTRUCTION CREW 1 CREW 2 STA L/R SIZE -TYPE LENGTH MATERIAL PLAN SHEET END STA STREET BEGIN STA SN-WM-ST-FM LENGTH SIZE -MATERIAL DEPTH x WIDTH SOIL TYPE CALC QUANTITY SPEC. GRAN. USED QUANTITY END STA YIELD= USED/ BEGIN STA COMMENTS: LENGTH FOREMAN VALVES, FITTINGS, HYDRANTS, MANHOLES AND CATCH BASINS WORKERS START TIME_ Station Type Depth Size END TIME INSPECTION TIME 7 ' DP PA TO Ji .'444M TOTAL HOURS 2/ JOB NUMBER //2-- .- c‘"Li D MILEAGE -76 INSPECTOR 6 /�) White - Office Yellow - Inspector • /��/ ♦ CONSULfWG ENGINEERS ■�� Maier Stewart & Associates Inc. qos DAILY REPORT PAGE OF CUENT L= 2 5 h PROJECT 2))) J DATESM(TFS CONTRACTOR (PRIME/SUB) !"!l c 4.) P iri SUPERINTENDENT (4- G4 -y `J TEMP. RANGE So --.7 d YVIND JO CLOUD COVER C/ . PRECIPITATION PIPE PROGRESS SERVICES ROAD CONSTRUCTION CREW 1 CREW 2 STA LA SIZE—TYPE LENGTH MATERIAL PLAN SHEET END STA STREET BEGIN STA SN-WM-ST-FM LENGTH SIZE -MATERIAL DEPTH x WIDTH SOIL TYPE CALC QUANTITY SPEC. GRAN. USED QUANTITY END STA YIELD= USED/ BEGIN STA COMMENTS: LENGTH FOREMAN VALVES, FITTINGS, HYDRANTS, MANHOLES AND CATCH BASINS WORKERS START TIME Station Type Depth Size END TIME COMMENTS: 7? Q t% c -F-:co T N ` INSPECTION TIME 7.00 /Qhi TO Z: 3apy) TOTAL HOURS 7 JOB NUMBER I/2 -4°s ``yO MILEAGE `i � INSPECTOR rCCP_ White — Office Yellow — Inspector CON ditetvia Maier Stewart & AssociatespInc. DAILY REPORT q-G� PAGE / OF CLIENT PI a in PROJECT 1, a)-)-• DATE /..7 9 S WTFS CONTRACTOR (PRIME/SUB) %Ji? yr h a SUPERINTENDENT t TEMP. RANGE 5"o 7 0 WIND o c. CLOUD COVER C 1D y PRECIPITATION a s PIPE PROGRESS SERVICES ROAD CONSTRUCTION CREW 1 CREW 2 STA L/R SIZE—TYPE LENGTH MATERIAL PLAN SHEET END STA STREET BEGIN STA SN—WM—ST—FM LENGTH SIZE—MATERIAL DEPTH x WIDTH SOIL TYPE CALC QUANTITY SPEC. GRAN. USED QUANTITY END STA YIELD= usED/ ALc BEGIN STA COMMENTS: LENGTH FOREMAN VALVES, FITTINGS, HYDRANTS, MANHOLES AND CATCH BASINS WORKERS START TIME Station Type Depth Size END TIME i E INSPECTION TIME o o An, TO /A 'o o i9sv TOTAL HOURS a r JOB NUMBER l / 2 —oo sy� YO MILEAGE —°3 INSPECTOR (14 (e (.1vs 4 -- White — Office Yellow — Inspector • • " ilditiet1 CONSULTING Ewonaits Maier Stewart & Associates Inc. c1 4'-& DAILY REPORT PAGE 1 OF CLJENT ah PROJECT \)a4) R<) DATE - ; --9Y. TWTFS$/1AS CONTRACTOR (PRIME/SUB) /Y? & 11.IV lin A. A2 C L SUPERINTENDENT h y TEMP. RANGE ca -TTI WIND / d CLOUD COVER ) PRECIPITATION PIPE PROGRESS SERVICES ROAD CONSTRUCTION CREW 1 CREW 2 STA L/R SIZE -TYPE LENGTH MATERIAL PLAN SHEET END STA STREET BEGIN STA SN-WM-ST-FM LENGTH SIZE -MATERIAL DEPTH x WIDTH SOIL TYPE CALC QUANTITY SPEC. GRAN. USED QUANTITY END STA YIELD= USED/mac BEGIN STA COMMENTS: LENGTH FOREMAN VALVES. FITTINGS. HYDRANTS. MANHOLES AND CATCH BASINS WORKERS START TIME Station Type Depth Size END TIME COMMENTS: \ ��► E h1-- -Fero d G'e- fl4tis s 5 -pc 5 L' 5. 2J<?O -up ice..) ,-i oNS !/1 cD/) L 14 1»G-31- 6 INSPECTION TIME/ TO 2 • 30P`» TOTAL HOURS ZICg JOB NUMBER /1Z -.00S " 51G MILEAGE Z 6 INSPECTOR C i;�ie White — Office Yellow — Inspector • • • Maier Stewart & Associates P.O. Box #334 Center City, Minnesota 550 Invoice numbe October 15, 1993 Page number 1 Project 112-005-10 TERMINAL ROAD OVERLAY & RECONSTRUCTION EAGAN PROJECT #661 City of Eagan Attn: Mr. Mike Foertsch 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, Minnesota 55122 For Engineering Services Rendered August 29 through September 25, 1993 Professional Services Hours Rate Multiplier Amount Registered Professional Engr. Bruce A. Irish Report Preparation 9-18-93 9-25-93 Graduate Engineer Gregory J. Stonehouse Correspondence 9-25-93 Project Coordination 9-18-93 Registered Land Surveyor Frank S. Kriz Project Meeting 9-18-93 Leonard Pilarski Research 9-25-93 Record Drawings 9-18-93 2.50 26.51 2.55 3.50 26.51 2.55 7.50 15.85 1.50 15.85 .50 25.90 4.00 23.65 1.50 23.65 169.00 236.60 2.55 303.14 2.55 60.63 2.55 33.02 2.55 241.23 2.55 90.46 Invoice number 10788 October 15, 1993 Page number 2 Project 112-005-10 TERMINAL ROAD OVERLAY & RECONSTRUCTION Professional Services Hours Rate Multiplier Amount Senior Draftsperson Merlin R. Jewell Job Development 9-18-93 Drafting 9-25-93 Services total Reimbursable Expense 1.00 22.989 6.00 22.989 28.00 2.55 2.55 58.62 351.73 1,544.43 Cost Amount PERSONAL TRUCK 9-25-93 46 miles @ .30 13.80 13.80 411 AUTOCAD 9-25-93 6 hours @ 15.00 90.00 90.00 Reimbursable total 103.80 Invoice total 1,648.23 Project Billing Summary Prior Current Total Professional Services .00 1,544.43 1,544.43 Reimbursable Expense .00 103.80 103.80 Total .00 1,648.23 1,648.23 • • Project 112-005-10 Invoice number 11063 November 15, 1993 Page number 3 TERMINAL ROAD OVERLAY & RECONSTRUCTION Professional Services Hours Surveying & Staking 10-02-93 10-16-93 10-30-93 Instrument Operator/Tech II Clifford L. Jones Surveying & Staking 10-23-93 Rod Person/Tech III Steven J. Gilmore Surveying & Staking 10-02-93 Word Processor Teddi J. Peterson Clerical 10-02-93 Rate Multiplier Amount 1.00 14.12 5.50 14.12 10.00 14.12 10.00 11.39 1.00 8.66 .50 16.63 Services total 158.50 Reimbursable Expense REPRODUCTION 10-30-93 Dakota PERSONAL VEHICLE 10-02-93 PERSONAL TRUCK 10-09-93 10-09-93 10-23-93 10-23-93 10-30-93 COMPANY TRUCK 10-16-93 10-23-93 10-30-93 • County Surveyor/Plat 30 miles @ 30 miles @ 50 miles @ 18 miles @ 60 miles @ 18 miles @ 30 miles @ 58 miles @ 40 miles @ .25 .30 . 30 .30 . 30 .30 .30 .30 .30 2.55 2.55 2.55 36.01 198.03 360.06 2.55 290.45 2.55 22.08 2.55 Cost 5.00 7.50 9.00 15.00 5.40 18.00 5.40 9.00 17.40 12.00 21.20 6,831.63 Amount 5.00 7.50 9.00 15.00 5.40 18.00 5.40 9.00 17.40 12.00 • • Project 112-005-10 Invoice number 11063 November 15, 1993 Page number 4 TERMINAL ROAD OVERLAY & RECONSTRUCTION Reimbursable Expense AUTOCAD 10-02-93 10-16-93 10-23-93 10-23-93 10-30-93 10-30-93 Cost Amount 5 hours @ 15.00 75.00 5 hours @ 15.00 75.00 22 hours @ 15.00 330.00 5 hours @ 15.00 75.00 8 hours @ 15.00 120.00 14 hours @ 15.00 210.00 Reimbursable total Project Billing Summary Professional Services Reimbursable Expense Total 75.00 75.00 330.00 75.00 120.00 210.00 988.70 Invoice total 7,820.33 Prior Current Total 1,544.43 6,831.63 8,376.06 103.80 988.70 1,092.50 1,648.23 7,820.33 9,468.56 1 • Project Maier Stewart & Associates P.O. Box #334 Center City, Minnesota 55012 Invoice number 11063 November 15, 1993 Page number 1 112-005-10 TERMINAL ROAD OVERLAY & RECONSTRUCTION EAGAN PROJECT #661 City of Eagan Attn: Mr. Mike Foertsch 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, Minnesota 55122 For Engineering Services Rendered, September 26 thru October 30, 1993 Professional Services Hours Rate Multiplier Amount Registered Professional Engr. Bruce A. Irish Report Preparation 10-02-93 10-09-93 10-23-93 10-30-93 Graduate Engineer 3.50 26.51 2.00 26.51 .50 26.51 1.50 26.51 2.55 2.55 2.55 2.55 236.60 135.20 33.80 101.40 Gregory J. Stonehouse Report Preparation 10-02-93 1.00 15.85 2.55 40.42 10-09-93 5.50 15.85 2.55 222.30 10-16-93 4.50 15.85 2.55 181.88 10-23-93 9.00 15.85 2.55 363.76 10-30-93 1.50 15.85 2.55 60.63 Registered Land Surveyor Leonard Pilarski Project Supervision 10-23-93 Research 10-02-93 g/ 1.00 23.65 2.55 60.31 1.00 23.65 2.55 60.31 4)//i 3 -()$r?, -7 78-c), - • Project 112-005-10 Invoice number 11063 November 15, 1993 Page number 2 TERMINAL ROAD OVERLAY & RECONSTRUCTION Professional Services Senior Draftsperson Merlin R. Jewell Drafting 10-02-93 10-16-93 10-23-93 10-30-93 Anthony G. Beasley Report Preparation 10-09-93 Joyce A. Weinhandl 410 Drafting 10-23-93 Surveying & Staking 10-16-93 10-30-93 10-30-93 Senior Technician Clyde F. Chase Report Preparation 10-30-93 Construction Inspection 10-23-93 John E. Johnson Surveying & Staking 10-30-93 Survey Crew Chief Scott J. Niemann Surveying & Staking 10-23-93 James L. Fitch • Hours Rate Multiplier Amount 5.00 22.989 5.50 22.989 22.50 22.989 8.00 22.989 5.00 14.70 2.55 2.55 2.55 2.55 293.11 322.42 1,319.00 468.98 2.55 187.43 5.00 12.08 2.55 4.00 12.08 4.00 12.08 21.00 12.08 2.00 20.50 2.00 20.50 5.50 8.66 10.00 17.19 2.55 2.55 2.55 154.02 123.22 123.22 646.88 2.55 104.55 2.55 104.55 2.55 121.46 2.55 438.35 • 1 Maier Stewart & Associate P.O. Box #334 Center City, Minnesota 55012 Invoice number 11372 December 10, 1993 Page number 1 Project 112-005-10 TERMINAL ROAD OVERLAY & RECONSTRUCTION EAGAN PROJECT #661 City of Eagan Attn: Mr. Mike Foertsch 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, Minnesota 55122 For Engineering Services Rendered October 31 through November 27, 1993 Professional Services Hours Rate Multiplier Amount Registered Professional Engr. Bruce A. Irish Report Preparation 11-06-93 11-13-93 11-20-93 Graduate Engineer Gregory J. Stonehouse Report Preparation 11-06-93 11-13-93 11-20-93 Registered Land Surveyor Leonard Pilarski Project Meeting 11-06-93 1.00 26.51 4.00 26.51 5.50 26.51 9.25 15.85 6.50 15.85 4.00 15.85 1.00 23.65 2.55 2.55 2.55 2.55 2.55 2.55 67.60 270.40 371.81 373.87 262.72 161.67 2.55 60.31 Senior Draftsperson Joyce A. Weinhandl Drafting 11-06-93 ?/1.00 12.08 2.55 11-13-93 1.50 12.08 2.55 11-20-93 .50 12.08 2.55 (c),) 30.80 46.21 15.40 • Invoice number 11372 December 10, 1993 Page number 2 Project 112-005-10 TERMINAL ROAD OVERLAY & RECONSTRUCTION Professional Services 11-27-93 Word Processor Teddi J. Peterson Clerical 11-20-93 Services total 411 Project Billing Summary Professional Services Reimbursable Expense Total • Hours Rate Multiplier Amount 3.00 12.08 2.55 92.41 .25 16.63 2.55 37.50 Prior 8,376.06 1,092.50 9,468.56 Labor adjustment 10.60 1,763.80 32.36 - Invoice total 1,731.44 Current 1,731.44 .00 1,731.44 Total 10,107.50 1,092.50 11,200.00 1 /(0 4 • Maier Stewart & Associate P.O. Box #334 Center City, Minnesota 550 Invoice number 11373 December 10, 1993 Page number 1 Project 112-005-20 TERMINAL ROAD DESIGN EAGAN PROJECT # /J_/ City of Eagan Attn: Mr. Mike Foertsch 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, Minnesota 55122 For Engineering Services Rendered October 31 through November 27, 1993 Professional Services Hours Rate Multiplier Amount Senior Draftsperson Merlin R. Jewell Drafting 11-06-93 11-20-93 11-27-93 Services total Reimbursable Expense 17.50 22.989 5.00 22.989 1.50 22.989 2.55 2.55 2.55 1,025.89 293.11 87.93 24.00 1,406.93 Cost Amount AUTOCAD 11-06-93 13 hours @ 15.00 195.00 195.00 11-20-93 5 hours @ 15.00 75.00 75.00 5Y/8 Reimbursable total 270.00 Invoice total 1,676.93 Project Billing Summary Prior Current Total Professional Services .00 1,406.93 1,406.93 Reimbursable Expense .00 270.00 270.00 Total .00 1,676.93 1,676.93 Maier Center Stewart & Associates P.O. Box #334 City, Minnesota 55012 Project 112-005-10 TERMINAL ROAD OVERLAY EAGAN PROJECT ' # 6 61 City of Eagan Attn: Mr. Mike Foertsch 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, Minnesota 55122 Invoice number 11653 January 10, 1994 Page number 1 & RECONSTRUCTION For Engineering Services Rendered November 28 through Januar , 1994 Professional Services Registered Professional Bruce A. Irish Report Preparation 12-11-93 12-18-93 Graduate Engineer Gregory J. Stonehouse Report Preparation 12-11-93 12-18-93 12-25-93 Senior Draftsperson Joyce A. Weinhandl Drafting 12-18-93 Services • Hours Rate Engr. ;z /,9 1.00 26.51 2.00 26.51 2.00 15.85 5.50 15.85 .50 15.85 3.50 12.08 total 14.50 y(,i 3 -b 7 Multiplier Amount 2.55 2.55 2.55 2.55 2.55 2.55 67.60 135.20 80.84 222.30 20.21 107.81 633.96 • Project Invoice number 11653 January 10, 1994 Page number 2 112-005-10 TERMINAL ROAD OVERLAY & RECONSTRUCTION Reimbursable Expense PERSONAL TRUCK 12-18-93 AUTOCAD 12-18-93 4 hours Cost Amount 30 miles @ .30 9.00 Project Billing Summary Professional Services Reimbursable Expense Total • • @ 15.00 60.00 Reimbursable total Prior 10,107.50 1,092.50 11,200.00 Invoice total 9.00 60.00 69.00 702.96 Current Total 633.96 10,741.46 69.00 1,161.50 702.96 11,902.96 • Maier Stewart & Associates P.O. Box #334 Center City, Minnesota 55012 `` r Invoice number 12627 May 10, 1994 Page number 1 Project 112-005-12 TERMINAL ROAD REVISED REPORT City of Eagan Attn: Mr. Mike Foertsch 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, Minnesota 55122 For Engineering Services Rendered March 27 through April 30, 1994 Professional Services Hours Rate Multiplier Amount Principal Engineer Steven D. Gatlin 110 Report Preparation 4-23-94 4-30-94 Word Processor Teddi J. Wheeler Clerical 4-30-94 Registered Professional Engr. George M. Stuempfig Project Supervision 4-23-94 Services total Reimbursable Expense PERSONAL VEHICLE 4-23-94 3.50 77.88 5.00 77.88 272.58 389.40 .25 44.06 11.02 6.00 20.80 2.55 318.24 14.75 991.24 Cost Amount 58 miles @ .25 14.50 14.50 Reimbursable total 14.50 /odS,i`a • Invoice number 12627 May 10, 1994 Page number 2 Project 112-005-12 TERMINAL ROAD REVISED REPORT Project Billing Summary Professional Services Reimbursable Expense Total • • Invoice total Prior Current .00 991.24 .00 14.50 .00 1,005.74 1,005.74 Total 991.24 14.50 1,005.74 6? q(4- • • RECt, Maier Stewart & Associates P.O. Box #334 Center City, Minnesota 55012 .;vii( 1 4 1994 Invoice number 12905 June 8, 1994 Page number 1 Project 112-005-12 TERMINAL ROAD REVISED REPORT City of Eagan Attn: Mr. Mike Foertsch 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, Minnesota 55122 For Engineering Services Rendered May 1 through May 28,\ 1994 Professional Services Hours Rate Multiplier Amount Principal Engineer Steven D. Gatlin Report Preparation 5-07-94 5-14-94 5-21-94 5-28-94 Word Processor Teddi J. Wheeler Clerical 5-14-94 5-28-94 Patricia M. Dowd Clerical 5-28-94 Services total Project Billing Summary Professional Services Reimbursable Expense Total 3.00 77.88 3.00 77.88 3.00 77.88 5.50 77.88 1.75 44.06 5.50 44.06 .25 13.20 233.64 233.64 233.64 428.34 77.11 242.33 2.55 8.42 22.00 1,457.12 Invoice total 1,457.12 Prior Current Total 991.24 1,457.12 2,448.36 14.50 .00 14.50 1,005.74 1,457.12 2,462.86 • RECEIVED SEP 12 1994 Maier Stewart & Associates P.O. Box #334 Center City, Minnesota 55012 —i lO(e.I R Project 112-005-12 TERMINAL ROAD REVISED REPORT Invoice number 13909 September 7, 1994 Page number 1 City of Eagan Attn: Mr. Mike Foertsch 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, Minnesota 55122 For Engineering Services Rendered July 31 through August 27, 1994 Professional Services Hours Rate Multiplier Amount Principal Engineer Steven D. Gatlin S Report Preparation 6-04-94 6-11-94 6-18-94 6-25-94 7-02-94 7-09-94 Word Processor Teddi J. Wheeler Clerical 6-25-94 7-02-94 Registered Professional Engr. Gregory J. Stonehouse Report Preparation 6-11-94 • 1.50 77.88 2.00 77.88 6.50 77.88 4.00 77.88 5.00 77.88 3.00 77.88 3.50 44.06 3.00 44.06 1.00 19.50 2.55 Services total 29.50 Invoice total 116.82 155.76 506.22 311.52 389.40 233.64 154.21 132.18 49.73 2,049.48 2,049.48 (6)(.er4( • Invoice number 13909 September 7, 1994 Page number 2 Project 112-005-12 TERMINAL ROAD REVISED REPORT Project Billing Summary Prior Current Total Professional Services 2,448.36 2,049.48 4,497.84 Reimbursable Expense 14.50 .00 14.50 Total 2,462.86 2,049.48 4,512.34 • • • • • RECEIVED SEP 12 1994 Maier Stewart & Associates P.O. Box #334 Center City, Minnesota 55012 Project 112-005-25 SIBLEY TERMINAL & ' Co c.a I City of Eagan Attn: Mr. Mike Foertsch 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, Minnesota 55122 Invoice number 13910 September 7, 1994 Page number 1 YANKEE DOODLE ROAD-$EPAXR For Engineering Services Rendered July 31 through August --994 Professional Services Hours Rate Multiplier Amount Principal Engineer Steven D. Gatlin Project Design 8-06-94 Registered Professional Engr. Bruce A. Irish Project Design 8-06-94 Specifications 8-06-94 Gregory J. Stonehouse Specifications 8-06-94 Senior Draftsperson Merlin R. Jewell Drafting 8-06-94 Joseph A. Milashius Drafting 8-13-94 / 3.00 77.88 233.64 10.00 58.93 2.00 58.93 2.00 19.50 589.30 117.86 2.55 99.45 6.00 25.14 2.55 1.00 14.30 2.55 384.64 36.47 • Project 112-005-25 Invoice number 13910 September 7, 1994 Page number 2 SIBLEY TERMINAL & YANKEE DOODLE ROAD REPAIR Professional Services Clerical Debbie S. Butterfield Clerical 8-20-94 8-27-94 Services total Reimbursable Expense Hours Rate Multiplier Amount POSTAGE & DELIVERY 8-27-94 UPS • AUTOCAD 8-06-94 8 hours • 2.00 13.48 .50 13.48 2.55 68.75 2.55 17.19 26.50 1,547.30 @ 15.00 Cost Amount 7.21 120.00 Reimbursable total 7.21 120.00 127.21 Invoice total 1,674.51 Project Billing Summary Prior Current Total Professional Services .00 1,547.30 1,547.30 Reimbursable Expense .00 127.21 127.21 Total .00 1,674.51 1,674.51 r RECEIVED 0 CT 19 1991i Maier Stewart & Associates P.O. Box #334 Center City, Minnesota 55012 Invoice number 14220 October 13, 1994 Page number 1 Project 112-005-40 YANKEE DOODLE ROAD OVERLAY PROJECT INSPECTION CITY PROJECT #661R EAGAN CONTRACT #94-02 City of Eagan Attn: Mr. Mike Foertsch 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, Minnesota 55122 For Engineering Services Rendered August 28 through October 1, 1994 Professional Services Hours Rate Multiplier Amount Principal Engineer 411 Steven D. Gatlin Construction Administration 9-03-94 Senior Technician Stephen W. Bulle Construction Inspection 9-24-94 10-01-94 Services total Reimbursable Expense PERSONAL TRUCK 9-24-94 10-01-94 • 1.50 77.88 116.82 10.00 19.98 2.55 5.00 19.98 2.55 509.49 254.75 16.50 881.06 Cost Amount 150 miles @ .30 45.00 45.00 60 miles @ .30 18.00 18.00 Reimbursable total 63.00 • Invoice number 14220 October 13, 1994 Page number 2 Project 112-005-40 YANKEE DOODLE ROAD OVERLAY PROJECT INSPECTION Invoice total 944.06 Project Billing Summary Prior Current Total Professional Services .00 881.06 881.06 Reimbursable Expense .00 63.00 63.00 Total .00 944.06 944.06 .'t (01 .e, 14 • • • • Maier Stewart & Associates P.O. Box #334 Center City, Minnesota 55012 Invoice number 14903 December 6, 1994 Page number 1 Project 112-005-40 YANKEE DOODLE ROAD OVERLAY PROJECT INSPECTION CITY PROJECT #661R EAGAN CONTRACT #94-02 r City of Eagan Attn: Mr. Mike Foertsch 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, Minnesota 55122 For Engineering Services Rendered October 30 through November 26, 1994 Professional Services Registered Professional Engr. Gregory J. Stonehouse Pay Estimates 11-19-94 Services total Project Billing Summary Professional Services Reimbursable Expense Total Hours Rate Multiplier Amount 1.00 19.50 1.00 2.55 49.73 49.73 Invoice total 49.73 Prior Current Total 1,846.03 49.73 1,895.76 110.40 .00 110.40 1,956.43 49.73 2,006.16 • • RE r E V `(moi tUf Maier Stewart & Associates P.O. Box #334 Center City, Minnesota 55012 0 Invoice number 14572 November 4, 1994 Page number 1 Project 112-005-40 YANKEE DOODLE ROAD OVERLAY PROJECT INSPECTION CITY PROJECT #661R EAGAN CONTRACT #94-02 City of Eagan Attn: Mr. Mike Foertsch 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, Minnesota 55122 For Engineering Services Rendered October 2 through October '29, 1994 Professional Services Hours Rate Multiplier Amount Registered Professional Engr. Gregory J. Stonehouse Construction Administration 10-22-94 Senior Technician Stephen W. Bulle Construction Inspection 10-08-94 10-22-94 Services total Reimbursable Expense PERSONAL TRUCK 10-08-94 10-22-94 2.50 19.50 2.55 124.31 14.50 19.98 2.55 2.00 19.98 2.55 738.76 101.90 19.00 964.97 Cost Amount 112 miles @ .30 33.60 33.60 46 miles @ .30 13.80 13.80 • Reimbursable total 47.40 • Invoice number 14572 November 4, 1994 Page number 2 Project 112-005-40 YANKEE DOODLE ROAD OVERLAY PROJECT INSPECTION Project Billing Summary Professional Services Reimbursable Expense Total • • Invoice total 1,012.37 Prior Current Total 881.06 964.97 1,846.03 63.00 47.40 110.40 944.06 1,012.37 1,956.43 • • • RECEY 7 Maier Stewart & Associates P.O. Box #334 Center City, Minnesota 55012 Invoice number 14571 November 4, 1994 Page number 1 Project 112-005-25 SIBLEY TERMINAL & YANKEE DOODLE ROAD REPAIR CITY PROJECT #661R EAGAN CONTRACT #94-02 City of Eagan Attn: Mr. Mike Foertsch 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, Minnesota 55122 For Engineering Services Rendered October 2 through Oct••= , -- Professional Services Hours Rate Multiplier Registered Professional Engr. Gregory J. Stonehouse Construction Administration 10-08-94 Services total Reimbursable Expense PERSONAL TRUCK 10-08-94 1.00 19.50 Amount 2.55 49.73 1.00 49.73 Cost Amount 42 miles @ .30 12.60 12.60 72 Reimbursable total 12.60 Invoice total 62.33 Project Billing Summary Professional Services Reimbursable Expense Total Prior Current Total 1,547.30 49.73 1,597.03 127.21 12.60 139.81 1,674.51 62.33 1,736.84 • Maier Stewart & Associates P.O. Box #334 Center City, Minnesota 55012 Invoice number 15992 March 16, 1995 Page number 1 Project 112-005-12 YANKEE DOODLE ROAD MILL & OVERLAY REVISED REPORT/PRELIMINARY DESIGN CITY PROJECT #661R City of Eagan F . -� Attn: Mr. Mike Foertsch f!?� L 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, Minnesota 55122 IL - (1/i For Engineering Services Rendered May 1 throu II APR - 4 jy 94 Professional Services Hours Rate Multiplier Amount Registered Professional Engr. Bruce A. Irish Project Design 5-14-94 5-21-94 5-28-94 6-04-94 6-11-94 6-18-94 Senior Draftsperson Merlin R. Jewell Drafting 5-14-94 6-11-94 Leland C. Sorenson Drafting 5-14-94 5-21-94 5-28-94 6-04-94 1.00 58.93 1.00 58.93 10.00 58.93 7.00 58.93 2.00 58.93 3.00 58.93 4.50 64.10 2.00 64.10 3.25 20.89 3.00 20.89 2.00 20.89 1.75 20.89 2.55 2.55 2.55 2.55 58.93 58.93 589.30 412.51 117.86 176.79 288.45 128.20 173.13 159.81 106.54 93.22 • • • Project 112-005-12 Invoice number 15992 March 16, 1995 Page number 2 YANKEE DOODLE ROAD MILL & OVERLAY Professional Services Senior Technician Clyde F. Chase Preliminary Design 6-11-94 6-18-94 Stephen W. Bulle Preliminary Design 6-18-94 Word Processor Margaret Spurgin Clerical 5-07-94 Services total Reimbursable Expense PERSONAL TRUCK 6-11-94 6-18-94 153 80 Project Billing Summary Professional Services Reimbursable Expense Total Hours Rate Multiplier Amount miles miles 12.00 20.54 2.55 4.00 20.54 2.55 2.00 19.97 2.55 1.50 15.00 2.55 60.00 Cost .30 45.90 .30 24.00 Reimbursable total Invoice total 628.52 209.51 101.85 57.38 3,360.93 Amount 45.90 24.00 69.90 3,430.83 Prior Current Total .00 3,360.93 3,360.93 .00 69.90 69.90 .00 3,430.83 3,430.83 • Maier Stewart & Associates P.O. Box #334 Center City, Minnesota 55012 Invoice number 15993 March 16, 1995 Page number 1 Project 112-005-20 SIBLEY TERMINAL INDUSTRIAL PARK DESIGN SERVICES CITY PROJECT #661 City of Eagan Attn: Mr. Mike Foertsch 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, Minnesota 55122 For Engineering Services Rendered January 2 through April 30, 1994 Professional Services Hours Rate Multiplier Amount Principal Engineer • Steven D. Gatlin Project Supervision 2-05-94 2-12-94 2-26-94 3-05-94 3-12-94 3-19-94 Project Meeting 1-08-94 2-12-94 2-26-94 3-05-94 3-12-94 Registered Professional Engr. David E. Nyberg Project Design 4-16-94 Bruce A. Irish Project Design 2-12-94 2-19-94 2-26-94 • , L� 1.00 77.88 1.00 77.88 2.50 77.88 1.00 77.88 8.00 77.88 1.00 77.88 2.00 77.88 2.50 77.88 .50 77.88 1.00 77.88 1.00 77.88 5.00 47.88 4.00 58.93 3.00 58.93 3.50 58.93 77.88 77.88 194.70 77.88 623.04 77.88 155.76 194.70 38.94 77.88 77.88 239.40 235.72 176.79 206.26 • Invoice number 15993 March 16, 1995 Page number 2 Project 112-005-20 SIBLEY TERMINAL INDUSTRIAL PARK Professional Services Hours Rate Multiplier Amount 3-12-94 4-02-94 4-09-94 Word Processor Teddi J. Wheeler Clerical 2-19-94 2-26-94 3-05-94 3-19-94 4-09-94 4-30-94 Clerical Tara B. Tranter Clerical 3-12-94 Registered Professional Engr. George M. Stuempfig Project Design 4-30-94 13.00 58.93 5.50 58.93 2.00 58.93 1.00 44.06 .25 44.06 6.50 44.06 2.00 44.06 .75 44.06 1.00 44.06 766.09 324.12 117.86 44.06 11.02 286.39 88.12 33.05 44.06 .50 18.74 9.37 1.00 20.80 2.55 53.04 Gregory J. Stonehouse Project Design 1-08-94 .50 19.50 2.55 24.86 1-15-94 6.00 19.50 2.55 298.35 1-22-94 5.00 19.50 2.55 248.63 2-26-94 1.00 19.50 2.55 49.73 3-12-94 3.50 19.50 2.55 174.04 4-09-94 .50 19.50 2.55 24.86 Senior Draftsperson Timothy Calhoun Drafting 1-15-94 3-12-94 Services total • 1.00 6.00 94.00 9.54 2.55 9.54 2.55 24.33 145.96 5,300.53 Project 112 -005-20 SIBLEY TERMINAL Invoice number 15993 March 16, 1995 Page number 3 INDUSTRIAL PARK Professional Services Project Billing Summary Professional Services Reimbursable Expense Total • Hours Rate Multiplier Amount Invoice total 5,300.53 Prior Current Total 1,406.93 5,300.53 6,707.46 270.00 .00 270.00 1,676.93 5,300.53 6,977.46 • I LI it r�( ' ISI j Maier Stewart & Associates P.O. Box #334 Center City, Minnesota 55012 AP Invoice number 15994 March 16, 1995 Page number 1 Project 112-005-25 YANKEE DOODLE ROAD MILL & OVERLAY FINAL DESIGN CITY PROJECT #661R EAGAN CONTRACT #94-02 City of Eagan Attn: Mr. Mike Foertsch 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, Minnesota 55122 For Engineering Services Rendered July 3 through August 27, 1994 Professional Services Hours Rate Multiplier Amount Registered Professional Engr. Bruce A. Irish Redesign 7-09-94 7-30-94 8-13-94 Senior Technician Stephen W. Bulle Redesign 7-30-94 Services total 2.00 58.93 1.00 58.93 2.00 58.93 12.50 19.97 17.50 2.55 Invoice total 117.86 58.93 117.86 636.55 931.20 931.20 Project Billing Summary Prior Current Total Professional Services 1,597.03 931.20 2,528.23 Reimbursable Expense 139.81 .00 139.81 Total 1,736.84 931.20 2,668.04 • Maier Stewart & Associates P.O. Box #334 Center City, Minnesota 5502 Invoice number 15995 March 16, 1995 Page number 1 Project 112-005-40 YANKEE DOODLE ROAD MILL & OVERLAY FIELD SERVICES CITY PROJECT #661R City of Eagan Attn: Mr. Mike Foertsch 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, Minnesota 55122 For Engineering Services Rendered July 31 through October 1, 1994 Professional Services Hours Rate Multiplier Amount Senior Technician Stephen W. Bulle 410 Construction Inspection 8-13-94 9-10-94 9-17-94 • Services total 5.00 1.50 2.50 19.97 19.97 19.97 2.55 2.55 2.55 254.62 76.39 127.31 9.00 458.32 Invoice total 458.32 Project Billing Summary Prior Current Total Professional Services .00 458.32 458.32 Total .00 458.32 458.32 • Maier Stewart & Associates P.O. Box #334 Center City, Minnesota 55012 Invoice number 15996 March 16, 1995 Page number 1 Project 112-005-58 YANKEE DOODLE ROAD ASSESSMENTS CITY PROJECT #661R City of Eagan Attn: Mr. Mike Foertsch 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, Minnesota 55122 (( / For Engineering Services Rendered January 29 through February 25, 1995 Professional Services Hours Rate Multiplier Amount Principal Engineer Steven D. Gatlin 110 Assessments 2-18-95 2-25-95 Registered Professional Engr. Gregory J. Stonehouse Assessments 2-11-95 2-18-95 Clerical Debbie S. Butterfield Assessments 2-18-95 Services total • 3.00 81.00 1.50 81.00 2.00 23.17 2.55 5.00 23.17 2.55 2.25 13.90 13.75 2.55 Invoice total 243.00 121.50 118.17 295.42 79.75 857.84 857.84 Invoice number 15996 March 16, 1995 Page number 2 Project 112-005-58 YANKEE DOODLE ROAD ASSESSMENTS Project Billing Summary Prior Current Total Professional Services .00 857.84 857.84 Total .00 857.84 857.84 • EAGAN MAINT. FAC. • TEL:612-681-4360 May 09 95 11:17 No.012 P.02 Maier Stewart & Associates P.C. Box #334 Center City, Minnesota 55012 Invoice number 16048 April 18, 1995 Page number 1 Project 112-005-58 YANKEE DOODLE ROAD ASSESSMENTS CITY PROJECT #661R City of Eagan Attn: Mr. Mike FOertsch 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, Minnesota 55122 For Engineering Services Rendered February 26 through April 1, 1995 Professional Services Hours Rate Multiplier Amount Principal Engineer Steven D. Gatlin Assessments 3-04-95 .50 81.00 40.50 3-11-95 3.00 81.00 243.00 3-25-95 .50 81.00 40.50 word Processor Teddi J. Wheeler Clerical 3-11-95 3-25-95 Registered Professional Engr. Gregory J. Stonehouse Assessments 3-04-95 Word Processor Patricia M. Dowd Clerical 3-25-95 • R=96% .50 46.04 .75 46.04 3.50 23.17 .25 13.39 23.02 34.53 2.55 206.79 2.55 8.54 612 681 4360 05-09-95 11:20AM P002 #45 EAGAN MAINT. FAC. TEL:612-681-4360 May 09 95 11:18 No.012 P.03 Invoice number 16048 April 18, 1995 Page Project 112-005-58 YANKEE DOODLE ROAD ASSESSMENTSer 2 Professional Services Clerical Hours Rate Multiplier Amount Debbie S. Butterfield Assessments 3-04-95 .25 13.90 2.55 8.86 Services total 9.25 605.74 Project Billing Summary Professional Services Total R=97% Invoice total 605.74 Prior Current Total 857.84 605.74 1,463.58 857.84 605.74 1,463.58 612 681 4360 05-09-95 11:20AM P003 #45 Interest Construction Interest is calculated on the rate of the Bond sale used to finance the particular project. • • D.S. FUND: 470 • CONST FUND: 372 PROJECT: 661R PROGRAM: 887 CONTRACT: 94-02 CITY OF EAGAN Sibley Terminal Industrial Park INTEREST CALCULATION 03/06/95 DATE PAYMENT INT RATE TIME TOTAL APRIL, 95 MARCH, 95 FEB, 95 JAN, 95' DEC, 94 NOV, 94 OCT, 94 SEPT, 94. AUG, 94 JULY, 94 JUNE, 94 MAY, 94 APRIL, 94 MARCH, 94 FEB, 94 JAN, 94 DEC, 93 NOV, 93 OCT, 93 SEPT, 93 AUG, 93 • 0.054 1/12 0.054 2/12 0.054 3/12 0.054 4/12 1,645.56 0.054 5/12 69.00 0.054 6/12 4,668.05 0.054 7/12 0.054 8/12 1,525.12 0.054 9/12 127.50 0.054 10/12 68.00 0.054 11/12 1,069.29 0.054 12/12 22.12 0.054 13/12 0.054 14/12 0.054 15/12 0.054 16/12 15,572.39 0.059 17/12 0.059 18/12 0.059 19/12 0.059 20/12 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 37.03 1.86 147.04 0.00 61.77 5.74 3.37 57.74 1.29 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,301.59 0.00 0.00 0.00 24, 767.03 1,617.43 • • • .5% Bonding Bonding costs 1/2 of 1% of construction costs. .005 x 21,371.76 = $106.86 Estimate of costs associated with the City issuing general obligation improvement bonds. Costs are bond rating agency fees, fiscal consultant's fees, and legal fees. • • 1.25% Legal Costs Legal Costs 1.25% of Construction costs. $21,371.76 x .0125 = $267.15 Estimate of Legal costs associated with special assessment projects. Work involves writing and publishing legal notices for improvement hearings, assessment hearings, reviews of feasibility and assessment reports and defending assessment appeals. Legal costs charged to Project through assessment roll preparation. Invoices attached equal $582.00 • SEVERSON, WILCOX & SHELDON, P.A. Attorneys at Law 600 Midway National Bank Building 7300 West 147th Street Apple Valley, Minnesota 55124 'Telephone (612) 432-3136 Fed I.U. 41-1547156 City of Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Road Box 21199 Eagan, MN 55121 Statement ;t 36688 RE: 206-11926 E -Sibley Terminal Ind. Park (P661) Services 15l JULY 29 1994 Account No. 206-11926 PAGE 2 JULY 06 94 JFS Consult with Tom C.; Legal Research 429; .80 68.00 T/C Tom C. re: Combined Contract JFS .80 85.00 68.00 111 iTOTAL HOURS .80 TOTAL FEES � f 68.00 ' CURRENT MONTH SERVICES /) $68.00 SEVERSON, WILCOX & SHELDON, P.A. Bilis payable within 30 days. • Please Detach & Return with your Remittance $ For proper credit, write your account number on your check. 0011 206-11926 City of Eagan 7/29/94 $68.00 SEVERSON, WILCOX & SHELDON, P.A. Attorneys at Law 600 Midway National Bank Building 7300 West 147th Street Apple Valley, Minnesota 55124 Telephone (612) 432-3136 Fed I.D. 41-1547156 City of Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Road Box 21199 Eagan, MN 55121 Statement tI 33780 RE: 206-11926 E -Sibley Terminal Ind. Park (P661) Services NOVEIIPER 30 1993 Account No. 206-11926 PAGE 2 NOV 02 93 JFS Conference with Tom C. and Mike F. re: .50 42.50 Proj. Schedule NOV 15 93 JFS Review for City Council Meeting _30 25.50 Ilt19 93 KAG Preparation of Resolution Authorizing16 93 JFS Prepare for and Attend Council fleeting .20 17.00 19 93 KAG Preparation of Resolution Authorizing .50 20.00 Report and Appraisal Process JFS 1.00 85.00 KAG .50 40.00 TOTAL HOURS TOTAL FEES CURRENT MONTH SERVICES SEVERSON, WILCOX & SHELDON, P.A. 85.00 20.00 1.50 105.00 $105.00 206-11926 Bills payable within 30 days. City o f Eagan • Please Detach & Return with your Remittance $ 11/30/93 33700 $105.00 • SEVERSON, WILCOX & SHELDON, P.A. City of Fagan 3930 Pilot Knob Foael Box 21199 Eagan, MN 55121 Statement tl Attorneys at Law 600 Midway National Bank Building 7300 West 147th Street Apple Valley, Minnesota 55124 Telephone (612) 432-3136 Fed 1.D. 41-1547156 PE: 206-11926 E -Sibley Terminal Tn..1_ F7.44 (F7,661', SPr,Jices DEC 20 93 ..1F.T, P-'iW 11.90 Jfl r, 1It.1tP en C .7.0 93 ifiriti Corr 9sprr•Irr:Inne, e • of •-•• 77! - 21 93 JFS iTonilt Wi th Hit t1r7-7,, t DEC 23 93 JFS Conc-oAlt with Tr...W, r,77.. Pepor t I t ram TOTAL FEES CLIREIIT H111411 F' P' r ce- //(,- SEVERSON, WILCOX & SHELDON, P.A. Bills payable within 30 days. • Please Detach & Return with your Remittance $ 1 / 0 .5. • S 00 (1 t r 1 ! SEVERSON, WILCOX & SHELDON, P.A. Attorneys at Law 600 Midway National Bank. Building 7300 West 147th Street Apple Valley, Minnesota 55124 Telephone (612) 432-3136 Fed I.D. 41-1547156 City of Eagan 3930 Pilot Knob Road Box 21199 Eagan, MN 55121 Statement t1 35501 RE: 206-11926 E -Sibley Terminal Ind. Park (P661) Services t 11:, APR 05 94 KAG Preparation of Resolution Au thnri . i ng Public Hearing APR 05 94 KAG Correspondence to DCT Enclosing Hn t i c,7? of Hearing 26 94 KAG Preparation of Resolution Denying Project KAG TOTAL FEES CURRENT MONTH SER+JICES SEVERSON, WILCOX & SHELDON, P.A. 1.'30 10, • i0 T01,11._ HOI'PS ij(r -c'g,-7 r' l l a t 7n,`7, , ,`7, _ 1 ,.) - c: 00 52.00 d Bills payable within 30 days. C i t rn f • Please Detach & Return with your Remittance $ For proper credit, write your account number on your check. nn1t • SEVERSON, WILCOX & SHELDON, P.A. Attorneys at Law 600 Midway National Bank Building 7300 West 147th Street Apple Valley, Minnesota 55124 Telephone (612) 432-3136 Fed I.D. 41-1547156 City of Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Road Box 21199 Eagan, MN 55121 Statement Si 35857 RE: 206-11926 E -Sibley Terminal Ind. Park (P661) Services MAY 31 1994 Account No. 206-11926 PAGE 2 MAY 06 94 MGD Conference with Tom Colbert - Allocation .80 68.00 of Costs (Assessments) MGD .80 85.00 TOTAL HOURS • TOTAL FEES CURRENT MONTH SERVICES SEVERSON, WILCOX & SHELDON, P.A. Bilis payable within 30 days. • Please Detach & Return with your Remittance $ For proper credit, write your account number on your check. 0011 68.00 .80 ile 68.00 *68.00 206-11926 City of Eagan 5/31/94 3587 *68.00 • SEVERSON, WILCOX & SHELDON, P.A. Attorneys at Law 600 Midway National Bank Building 7300 West 147th Street Apple Valley, Minnesota 55124 Telephone (612) 432-3136 Fed I.D. 41-1547156 City of Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Road Box 21199 Eagan, MN 55121 Statement # 36260 RE: 206-11926 E -Sibley Terminal Ind_ Park (P661) Services JUNE 70 1q94 Account Ho. 206-1197G PAGE 2 JUNE 02 94 JFS Prepare for and Attend Public Works 1.30 110.70 Comm. Meeting on this Issue JUNE 21 94 MGD Complete Notice of Public Hering .20 17.00 III JFS 1.90 95.00 110.50 MGD .20 85 00 1 7.00 TOTAL HOURS 1.50 TOTAL FEES / 7,i/ CURRENT MONTH SERVICES teW ?;7 SEVERSON, WILCOX & SHELDON, P.A. Bills payable within 30 days. • Please Detach & Return with your Remittance $ For proper credit, write your account number on your check. 0011 127.9n $127.50 t_ 206-11926 City of Fagan E3091 367G0 $127.50 • • • County Records Fee During 1994, Dakota County started charging the City $2 per levy for administration of special assessments. The City includes in the assessment roll an amount equal to $2/per parcel/per year. For this project, it was computed at: Term 10 years Parcels 43 Fee $2 $2 x 10 x 43 = $860 • • Other Costs This is for other miscellaneous related costs . Gerald Wobschall, CPA (Retained Financial Consultant) $345.00 33.67 2 $378.67 'Review of Feasibility studies 2Costs to assure that City is notifying the correct property owners with the assessment notices. CLIENT NAME. ', ( GERALD R WOBSCHALL CPA Client Billing Worksheet CITY OF EAGAN ,3TOT-SANITARY TRUNK, (SUBTOT-MAJOR STREET [SUBTOT-PROJ 590 [SUBTOT-PROJ 601A [SUBTOT-PROJ 607 [SUBTOT-PROJ 609 [SUBTOT-PROJ 617 [SUBTOT-PROJ 627 [SUBTOT-PROJ 631 •BTOT_PROJ 638 [SUBTOT-PROJ 643 [SUBTOT-PROJ 646 [SUBTOT-PROJ 647 [SUBTOT-PROJ 648 [SUBTOT-PROJ 650 [SUBTOT-PROJ 656 [SUBTOT-PROJ 659 [SUBTOT-PROJ 660 [SUBTOT-PROJ 661R [SUBTOT-PROJ 662 • HOURS AMOUNT n L- ♦ 4'-I-oir,.1 .fwcrTel/.5.25 J+4 ,1 7 153-(>67 ej a LI L/ O ., 9 :37 L/ O L/0 - c.). LILQIg -- 85/ L/9 LLo/O - g6-7 c)&100 - . 9577), Lib <74LIo ? _ . a-LQ.4 'th, , L) ttrt /11 �, Civ tla) „S a i i � �� &am. 3,457.50) 41.75 1,252.50] 15.75 472.50] 33.50 1,005.00] 15.00 450.00] 12.50 375.00] 6.00 180.00] 7.00 210.00] 7.50 225.00] 6.00 180.00] 6.50 195.00] 20.50 615.00] 41.25 1,237.50] 63.50 1,905.00) 26.25 787.50] 5.50 165.00] 24.00 720.00] 21.75 652.50) 5.50 .165.00] 26.75 802.50] / f1 Page 1 TOTAL 11S. 5-(3 F,54.r0 Dee 01/03/94 Time 1:39 pm GERALD R WOBSCHALL CPA Client Billing Worksheet Page 2 EAGAN :CITY OF EAGAN (continued) [SUBTOT-PROJ 633 [SUBTOT-PROJ 635 [SUBTOT-PROJ 639 [SUBTOT-PROJ 640 [SUBTOT-PROJ 641 [SUBTOT-PROJ 645 0 (p 1 g- OgSU [ SUBTOT-PROJ 646 ►1 62 12 _p S 6S [SUBTOT-PROJ 647 q(oI 086(P [SUBTOT-PROJ 648 U (p I R- b g 5"/ [SUBTOT-PROJ 651 BTOT-PROJ 654 BTOT-PROJ 655 -° S%q [SUBTOT-PROJ 658 4(4 I iS -041 [SUBTOT-PROJ 659 L-1 101 g g6 [SUBTOT-PROJ 661 L4 WS [SUBTOT-PROJ 662 Cj (p Ig- Og$g [SUBTOT-PROJ 665 L1 (p1$ -bR 1 I [ SU13TOT-PROD 666 t1 tp I .. �� , (} [SUBTOT-STREET LIGHT 4:10- O``/ 3 • a 1 26.50 795.00] 21.75 652.50] 27.25 817.50] 9.00 270.00] 26.75 802.50] 5.50 165.00] 5.00 150.00] 5.50 165.00] 5.00 150.00] 12.25 367.50] 12.50 375.00] 5.75 172.50] 12.50 375.00] 17.00 510.00] 6.00 .180.00] 5.50 165.00] 8.00 240.00] 7.50 225.00] 77.00 2,310.00] £119,(: (),), 3(> • Date C_n Time DFI IVERY SERVICE 04/08/94 Job # Auth CITY OF EAGAN 3830 PILOT KNOB ROAD EAGAN, ?iN 55172 Caller B/L # D0840137 EAANNA KIVI 16.0 0 •O INVOICE )Thct 5-I-7-�,}�I Invoice No. Account No. Billing Thru: Page: Branch: Remit Payment To: 04309401006 1006 04/30/94 l of 1 TO INSURE PROPER POSTING TO YOUR ACCOUNT PLEASE DETACH AND RETURN WITH YOUR PAYMENT Origin Destination/POD SUMMARY OF CURRENT ORDERS DAKOTA COUNTY 60V'T CENTER 1590 HWY 55 HAST IN6S, NN 55033 PCS 1 DEL 10:57 60 • wk - nvoice No. Account No. Billing Thru: Page: Branch: 04309401006 1006 04 30 94 l of 1 CITY OF EAGAN 3830 PILOT KNO6 ROAD EA6AN, NN 55122 Base Charge 23.10 DELIVERY 3 Hour Weekday 45% 44,1g*roglici • .t On Time Delivery P.O. Box 201235 Bloomington, MN 55420 (612) 884-4060 Fax: (612) 884-7132 Surcharges Total SUBTOTAL 23.10 23.10 WT - Weight Charge WA - Wait Time XZ - X-tra Stop/Zone X8 - X-tra Stop/Bldg 92_1 Time TERMS: 11=1111.11111 AC - Advanced Fee Charge NT - Notary MI - Wage XA - Xtra Attidavit/Service Current OVER 30 DC - Discount MS - Misc. Charge 0.0 Current Charges NMI OVER 60 0.00 OVER 90 Total Due Finance Charge per terms 23.10 • 4 - Svbt 1 G a's ‘ockoAktrention: Deanna Telephone: 681-4620 Company: DAKOTA COUNTY GOVERNMENT CENTER 1590 Highway 55 Hastings, Minnesota 55033 City of Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Rd. Eagan MN 55122 • • Computer time (HH:MM:ss) Batch @ $388/hour, $6.47/Min, $.11/recd Date: 04/08/94 Pages printed 77 .printed @ $.25 per page C) Reel/Cartridge tapes supplied 0 $25.00/Each D) Labels supplied 0 $.25 per page or .0208 per label E) Custom programming hours @ 42.00/Hour F) Other costs Set up costs (fixed) $ 19.25 $ 25.00 Total Costs 41(91 g—cAs ,� �G3Ss GG special tnstruotions: 44 95 Completed by: Date: / /_ (Data Processing or Asssors office date to Auditors not applicable if Auditor report) Completed (Au• 'rs Dater/OS/� Customer piokupl -,, Date;7 / /`�c` (Customer or representative and date sent or pI ec•I—up) • Estimated Costs To Complete The City charges 2% of the contract cost up to a maximum of $2,000. The charge for this project is (21,317.76 x .02) = $427.44. The City has been charging this fee for at least 10 years. The purpose of this fee is to finance additional contractor and consultant costs beyond the estimate used to prepare the assessment roll follow-up warranty and compliance inspections, contractor's claims/disputes and other similar undefined costs that were not known when he assessment roll was prepared. •