Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
03/02/1992 - City Council Regular
/` (. 'y AGENDA GULAR MEETING GAN CITY COUNCIL GAN, MINNESOTA MUNICIPAL CENTER BUILDING MONDAY, MARCH 2, 1992 6:30 P.M. I. 6:30 - ROLL CALL & PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE (BLUE) II. 6:35 - ADOPT AGENDA & APPROVAL OF MINUTES (SLUE) III. 6:45 - DEPARTMENT HEAD BUSINESS (BLUE) IV. 6:55 - CONSENT AGENDA (PINK) f' Z A. PERSONNEL ITEMS Z B. PROCLAMATION, Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Awareness Month, March 1992 C• RECOMMENDATION, Airport Relations Commission for MASAC Representative �: D. APPOINT Election Judges for April 7, 1992, Presidential Primary 1 � E. APPLICATION, Tree-Stump Company/Robert Hutcheson, for Tree Maintenance Contractor License r, 13 F. RESOLUTION, Redemption of Improvement Bonds '''G. PROJECT 627, Receive Feasibility Report/Order Public Hearing (Oak Cliff 6th Addition - Utilities) 0 �H . VACATE Utility Easement, Receive Petition/Order Public Hearing (Lot 6, block 1, Lakeside Estates) p , I. AUTHORIZATION, Lottery Selection, Part 150 Sound Insulation Program ,..1,2, J. PROJECT 630, Receive Feasibility Report/Order Public Hearing (Woodlands North 2nd Addition - Streets & Utilities) _Z(o K. AUTHORIZATION, Lembke Settlement IPV. 7:00 - PUBLIC HEARINGS (SALMON) There are no public hearings. VI. OLD BUSINESS (ORCHID) 2.1' ( A. REZONING, Weston Hills Addition/Lyman Development, of Approximately 64 Acres from 67, an R-1 (Single Family) District and a Preliminary Plat Consisting of 132 Lots Located East of Highway 3, South of Cliff Road in the East 1/2 of Section 36 f , h113. CONSIDERATION of Five-Year (1992-1996) Capital Improvement Budget +tki C. CONSIDERATION of Outdoor Swimming Pool/Arena Project 1 VII. NEW BUSINESS (TAN) \ aq AGREEMENT, Cost Sharing of Aerial Photography and Stereo Digitizing, City of Eagan and Dakota County B. SPECIAL USE PERMIT, Cub Foods, to Allow a Temporary Greenhouse on Lot 1, Block 1, Cliff Lake Centre, Located in the Southeast 1/4 of Sec 29 132.C. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT, Norwest Bank, to Allow a Pylon Sign and a VARIANCE to the 300' Spacing Requirement on Lot 4, block 1, Cedarvale 2nd Addition Located Along the East Side of Sibley Memorial Highway in the NE 1/4 of Sec 19 D. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT, Midwest Bottling, Inc. , to Allow a Building Over 40' Tall in a LI (Ligh Industrial) district Located Along the East Side of Eagandale Boulevard in the NE 1/4 of Sec 3 )5 . CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT, Magnum Towing, to Allow Outdoor Storage on Lot 3, Block ill) 1, Halley's 1st Addition, Located Along the West Side of Biscayne Avenue in the SE 1/4 of Sec 36 f2/15 F. PRELIMINARY PLAT, Midwest Restaurant Associates/Town Centre 70 - 12th Addition, Consisting of One Lot and One Outlot on Approximately 3.5 CSC (Community Shopping Center) Acres and a Conditional Use Permit to Allow On-Sale Liquor, 3.2 Beer o Wine, in a CSC District Located West of Town Centre Dr in the NW 1/4 of Sec 15 n ill G. COMPREHENSIVE GUIDE PLAN AMENDMENT, Independent School District 196/Elementary School #17, from D-1 (Single-Family) to PF (Public Facilities) a REZONING of approximately 15 acres from AG (Agricultural) to PF (Public Facilities), and a PRELIMINARY PLAT Consisting of One Lot for an Elementary School Located Along the South Side of Wescott Road and East of Denmark Avenue in the NE 1/4 of Sec 22 (REQUEST TO CONTINUE TO THE MARCH 17, 1992, REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING) VIII. ADDITIONAL ITEMS (GOLD) IX. ADMINISTRATIVE AGENDA (GREEN) X. VISITORS TO BE HEARD (for those persons not on agenda) XI. ADJOURNMENT • • MEMO TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCILMEMBERS • FROM: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES DATE: FEBRUARY 27, 1992 SUBJECT: AGENDA INFORMATION FOR THE MARCH 2, 1992 CITY COUNCIL MEETING i.M)OlvT AGENDAVAffROVE After approval is given to the March 2, 1992 City Council agenda, the February 18, 1992 regular City Council minutes, the February 25, 1992, January 14, 1992, December 17, 1991 and November 26, 1991 Special City Council meeting minutes, the following items are in order for consideration. DEPAIVMEM'HEAD BUSINESS, There are no department head business items at this time. • • Agenda Information Memo 411 March 2, 1992 City Council Meeting iggiggrAARMW • There are eleven (11) items on the agenda referred to as Consent Items requiring one (1) motion by the City Council. If the City Council wishes to discuss any of the items in further detail, those items should be removed from the Consent Agenda and placed under Additional Items unless the discussion required is brief. PERSONNEL ITEMS A. PERSONNEL ITEMS: Item 1. Sergeants/Police Department--The Police Department has just completed a very thorough.promotion procedure for two positions of sergeant which were approved for the 1992 budget. 16 officers and investigators participated in the program. The results of this hiring procedure recommend that Trent Johnson and Jim McDonald be promoted to the position of sergeant in the Police Department. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the promotion of Trent Johnson and Jim McDonald. • Item 2. Utility Maintenance Worker--Over 100 applications were received for this vacant position. After reviewing applications, 35 applicants were invited to the Maintenance Facility for testing. After reviewing test results, 7 applicants were interviewed on Friday, February 28, 1992. If a recommendation is able to be presented to the Council at its meeting Monday night, pending a reference check, the name will be furnished that evening. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the hiring of the person to be named at the meeting Monday night as utility maintenance worker subject to successful completion of the physical examination. CHRONIC FATIGUE SYNDROME AWARENESS PROCLAMATION B. Proclamation,Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Awareness Month,March, 1992—Enclosed on � pages �j through `r is correspondence from the Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Association of Minnesota and Mrs. Ronald Winge, an Eagan resident whose family is affected by this illness. The correspondence requests that the City recognize CFS awareness month as outlined in the proclamation enclosed on pages S and (c, . ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the resolution proclaiming March, 1992 as Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Awareness Month in the City of Eagan as • presented. Febaruary 8, 1992 ‘ , I \L./ I I 'n?2 T� The Honorable Tom Egan i`' U Mayor of Eagan L 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55122 Dear Mayor Egan , I am a resident of Eagan and am writing with a special request concerning a serious medical problem. Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (CFS ) , an illness officially defined by the Center for Disease Control in 1988 , has drastically affected my son ' s life . For the last five years his disease has affected our family life , and pleasurable activities he used to enjoy. The weakness , severe fatigue , and other flu-like symptoms disabled my son so much that he finally had to give up his job. Misinformation about CFS is widespread and we feel fortunate to have joined the CFS Association of Minnesota . This all-volunteer, non-profit organization has been a source of support as it works to help others understand the devastating impact of CFS. I am asking you to join governmental officials across the state in officially proclaiming March as the first CHRONIC FATIGUE SYNDROME AWARENESS MONTH in Eagan. Please see the enclosed literature and sample proclamation . Your support of this request will mean a lot to me , my son, our family, and all patients with CFS. I would welcome the opportunity to meet with you to accept the proclamation on behelf of the CFS Association of Minnesota. I will call your office next week to answer any questions you may have , and to arrange additional details . Thank you for your time in considering this important request . I look forward to meeting you. Sincerely, --4//2; 4). u--14,z4:41-7/(1,,,j7-7(_, Mrs . Ronald Winge (Eileen ) 1581-B Clemson Drive Eagan , MN 55122 452-9811 3 P. 0. Box 385036 Minneapolis, MN 55438 612-943-2769 . CFS CFS A syndrome characterized by persistent, incapacitating fatigue Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Association of Minnesota February 5, 1992 RE: REQUEST FOR PROCLAMATION TO DESIGNATE MARCH AS CHRONIC FATIGUE SYNDROME AWARENESS MONTH Honorary Member of the Board The Honorable Rudy Perpich Dear Mayor, Board of Directors Judy Basso, I am writing to urge your favorable consideration of the enclosed letter from one of President your constituents, which requests that you issue an official proclamation which Brian Lutterman, designates March, 1992 as Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Awareness Month in your Vice President community. CFS is a life-altering illness which has been recognized and studied by Sheryl Kolsum, the U.S. Centers for Disease Control. It differs from the typical feelings of fatigue by Treasurer Julie Klotzbach, degree and duration and includes an array of other debilitating symptoms. Please see Secretary the enclosed literature for more information about CFS. John Seagard Bill LaVictoire Volunteers for the CFS Association of Minnesota are working in conjunction with the Penny Crandall National Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Association, which is sponsoring a nationwide kal Advisors effort to encourage government officials to proclaim for the first time an entire month lin r C.w a, for CFS awareness. We work closely with this organization because of our mutual M.D. goal to promote medically accurate information about CFS. Philip K.Peterson, M.D. We have enclosed a sample CFS proclamation, similar to the one used in past years by Christian G.Schrock, Governor Carlson, for your consideration. Additionally,we request that you present M.D. the proclamation to representatives of our organization,possibly at a city council Nurse Advocate meeting,around the end of February or early in March. Jeri Stroud, • R.N. We would also be honored to have your participation in our awareness celebration � so which will be held from 1-4 p.m., Sunday,March 15,at Abbott Northwestern Karalee Beierschmitt Hospital in Minneapolis. Linda Beiersch itt, AA Thank you for your assistance in the recognition of CFS as a serious health concern in Terrie Cummings, Minnesota. RN.,B.S.N. Richard Kofsky, Ph.D.,L.C.P. Beth van den Berg, B.S.,O.T.R Sincerely, CHRONIC FATIGUE SYNDROME ASSOCIATION OF MINNESOTA fudy Basso President MEMBER C /MINED Enclosures OF MINNESOTA CITY OF EAGAN • PROCLAMATION CHRONIC FATIGUE SYNDROME AWARENESS MONTH MARCH, 1992 WHEREAS, Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (CFS) is a serious illness marked by debilitating fatigue and weakness, accompanied--by flu-like symptoms and cognitive impairment, and; WHEREAS, victims often experience symptoms of sufficient severity to interfere with their participation in the activities of daily life for many months or years, and the loss to society of productive people in their prime earning years is great, and; WHEREAS, because some physicians are unfamiliar with CFS, routine diagnostic tests fail to suggest a specific disease, and insurance and disability compensators may delay or deny CFS-related claims, the burdens for CFS sufferers are even greater, and; WHEREAS,there is an alarming lack of understanding and concern about how CFS impacts individuals, diminishing their ability to enjoy life, disrupting education and employment, and creating tremendous medical expenses, and; WHEREAS, the Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Association of Minnesota • continues to provide reliable information to the afflicted and their families, the health care providers and the public to stimulate interest in finding effective treatments and a cure for CFS. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City of Eagan proclaims the month of March 1992 as Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Awareness Month and urges all residents to become aware of this disorder and support efforts to find a cure. CITY OF EAGAN CITY COUNCIL By: Its Mayor Attest: Its Clerk Motion made by: Seconded by: Those in favor: Those against: • Dated: CERTIFICATION • I, E.J. VanOverbeke, Clerk of the City of Eagan, Dakota County,tY, Minnesota, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted by the City Council of the City of Eagan, Dakota County, Minnesota, in a regular meeting thereof assembled this day of , 1992. E.J. VanOverbeke, City Clerk City of Eagan i • Agenda Information Memo March 2, 1992 City Council Meeting MASAC REPRESENTATIVES C. Recomm ndation,Airport Relations Commission for MASAC Representatives--Enclosed on page '< is a memorandum from staff outlining the Airport Relations Committee's recommendation that Dustin Mirick be appointed as the City's MASAC representative and that Lois Monson and Jon Hohenstein be appointed as the City's alternate representatives. Further information with respect to MASAC and past practice in this regard is outlined in the memorandum. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the Airport Relations Commission recommendation to appoint Dustin Mirick as the City's MASAC representative for a three year term and Lois Monson and Jon Hohenstein as MASAC alternate members for one year terms. • • • MEMORANDUM TO: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES FROM: ASSISTANT TO THE CITY ADMINISTRATOR HOHENSTEIN DATE: FEBRUARY 13, 1992 SUBJECT: ARC RECOMMENDATION - MASAC REPRESENTATIVES In action taken at its meeting of February 11, 1992, the Airport Relations Committee recommended that the City Council reappoint Dustin Mirick as the City's MASAC Representative for a three year term and that Lois Monson and Jon Hohenstein be appointed for one year alternate terms. The City of Eagan is entitled to one regular seat on the Metropolitan Aircraft Sound Abatement Council and an unspecified number of alternate seats. MASAC is an advisory body to the Metropolitan Airports Commission for noise issues. It is made up of representatives from cities adjacent to the airport and and equal number of industry representatives. The organization meets monthly. While it is not essential, it has been the City's practice to appoint ARC members to MASAC to be certain that the City is represented in a manner consistent with the policies it has developed. Mr. Mirick has served in this capacity for several Ask years and brings a level of continuity and expertise to the position. Ms. Monson joined the Committee in 1991 and brings a background from the airport advisory body in her former community. Last year, it was decided to have a staff person serve as one of the alternates to be certain that all MASAC information was received at the City offices and to ensure meeting coverage in the event that the volunteer representatives were not available. This recommendation is in order for consideration by the City Council. If you have any questions in this regard, please let me know. :10&47L. As tan to the City Administrator Agenda Information Memo • March 2, 1992 City Council Meeting PRESIDENTIAL PRIMARY ELECTION JUDGES D. Appoint Election Judges for April 7, 1992,Presidential Primary—Enclosed on page 10 is the list of election judges for the April 7 presidential primary. It is necessary for the City Council to approve these judges to oversee the conduct of the voting prior to each election. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve appointment of the election judges for the April 7, 1992 presidential primary as presented. • • 1110 LIST OF JUDGES FOR APPROVAL . PRESIDENTIAL PRIMARY/REFERENDUM APRIL 7 , 1992 DEMOCRAT REPUBLICAN SHARON SCHOELLER ANN OURADNIK EVELYN COTA ROSE VIMR PATRICIA KAEDER TERRI BERKNESS LEO AMUNDSON MILDRED HARTELBEN JUDY KAZDA AURELIA POPPLER BARBARA SHIELDS MARILYN LEGLER IRENE WACHTLER JUDY HAWLEY MARY KELLNER IRENE KREIDBERG RUTH TWOMEY JUNE KETCHAM ORLEAN GARNESS SANDRA NELSON FRAN BOHN THERESA NELSON JANICE MERCK MARK OLSON SHARON ORTH NANCY HAMMEL WALTER LAWRENCE JOHN BELLOWS HAROLD PETERSON JIM DECH JUDY SAIMA SHARON ASTLEFORD OLIVER MCCULLOCH MARIE LANE JANET SCHUETZE ETHEL GROFF BARB SCHREINER LYLE SEVERSON PAULINE LEGENDRE CLARENCE HANSON ANNE SULLIVAN JOAN BOHLIG ROSEMARY TEAFORD MARILYN PORTER DOROTHY PETERSON ELEANOR BRUCE BEATRICE COOPER JEAN KIMBER NORMA WADE CAROL VIHOVDE MARILYN HOLM SONYA LARSON HELEN JARVI PHYLLIS LIGMAN CHARLOTTE O'DONNELL IONA RAY VICKIE JABBRA MICHELLE SKINDELIEN LOIS AGRIMSON PATTI BENJAMIN SANDI ANDERSON SHIRLEE KLANG JUNE NELSON MARY HANSEN PAT RASK NANCY JARVI MARIE DESLAURIER EMILY MEDIN EDITH DRAKE CATHY BROST JUDY MUNDAHL BARB NUTTALL JAN GIEFER MARGE JACOBS LILA BERGH ZELLA MIRICK RAMONA BROMAN BARB LINERT MARTI ANN GUETZLAFF ADELINE BUEHLER JUDY PETERSON GLORIA CZYCALLA BERNADINE GOESS AURELIA PETERSON FRANK HAMERNIK LYNN PRAZAK JIM DRISCOLL WILLIAM SKAR ROBERT GORDON DON HANSEN ELAINE JONES PAUL YOUNGER S STELL LUNDQUIST MARY JANE LAROCK CAROLYN THURSTON MARK HAMMEL ` 0 1 Agenda Information Memo • March 2, 1992 City Council Meeting TREE MAINTENANCE LICENSE E. Application,Tree Stump Company/Robert Hutcheson,for Tree Maintenance Contractor License--City Code requires that tree maintenance contractors be licensed on at least an annual basis. Enclosed on page 12is an application from Robert C. Hutcheson on behalf of the Tree Stump Company for a license in this regard. The application has been reviewed by City staff and is in order for consideration by the City Council at this time. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the application for Tree Stump Company,Robert Hutcheson, for a tree maintenance contractor license as presented. • i City of Eagan • ree: aza.w rcj 3830 Pilot Knob Road APPLICATION FOR LICENSE • License year (q q Eagan, MN 55122-1897 TREE MAINTENANCE CONTRACTOR For individual,partnership or corporation who cut, trim, prune, remove spray or beat trees. • I, Robert C. Hutcheson hereby make application for a TREE MAINTENANCE CONTRACTOR license for the year 1992 from the City of Eagan. owNER: Robert Hutcheson ADDRESS: 13677 Dan Patch Drive PHONE # 447-1817 (street) Savage 55378 • (city) (state) (zip) BUSINESS NAME: The Tree-Stump Co. ADDRESS: 13677 Dan Patch Drive PHONE # 447-6187 tea (•=' t) a, Savage MN 55378 (city) (state) (zip) EMPLOYEES PERFORMING TREE MAINTENANCE: Name: Thomas E. Dorn (first) (middle) (last) Name: D'Aun Reeves (first) (middle) (last) • Name: (first) (middle) (last) Name: (first) (middle) (last) (ATTACH ADDITIONAL NAMES) VEHICLES USED FOR TREE MAINTENANCE: 1986 Chev El Camino RBP 718 1981 Ford Pickup NUZ793 (name) (year) (make) • (model) (license number) 1975 Ford Trunk YU35870 1976 Ford Truck YU25801 (name) (year) (make) (model) (license number) 1978 Ford Truck YS82323 • 1982 Ford Pickup 188 DNC (name) (year) (make) (model) (license number) (ATTACH ADDITIONAL VEHICLE INFORMATION) EQUIPMENT USED FOR TREE MAINTENANCE: (e.g., stump grinder, brush dipper,chalnsaws,sprayer,etc.) Stump Grinders - grind stumps Brush Chippers - chip brush (name) (function) Chainsaws - cut- branches • (name) (function) (ATTACH ADDITIONAL EQUIPMENT INFORMATION) Agenda Information Memo • March 2, 1992 City Council Meeting RESOLUTION/IMPROVEMENT BONDS F. Resolution, Redemption of Improvement Bonds--To proceed with the implementation of the Community Investment Fund it is necessary to satisfy the obligation on seven (7) outstanding bond issues in the Consolidated Debt Service Bond Fund. The most straight forward method in wh'ch to accomplish that satisfaction is to call the bonds. The resolution enclosed as page i has been prepared by Bond Counsel, Steve Rosholt of Faegre and Benson and is required to proceed with this early redemption. The seven (7) issues would otherwise be paid-in-full at various times, the latest being October 1, 1997. The total principal being called is $1,070,000 ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the resolution calling certain outstanding improvement bonds for redemption. 11111 • 3 1 FEB 27 '92 12:41 FREGRE & BLNSON P.2 RESOLUTION CALLING CERTAIN OUTSTANDING IMPROVEMENT BONDS FOR REDEMPTION • Eagan, as fo BE llows:IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of 1. It is hereby determined that it is in the best interests of the city to call for prior redemption as set forth below the outstanding bonds of the following issues which are then subject to prior redemption: Issue Daperiptiop sue Dat Improvement Bonds of 1966 October 1, 1966 October , 1992 Improvement Bonds of 1967 June 1, 1967 October 1, 1992 I provsment Bonds of 1967, Series R December 1, 1967 October i, 1992. General Obligation Improvement Bonds of 1973 October 1, 1973 October 1, 1992 General Obligation Refunding Bonds of 1976 June 1, 1976 July 1, 1992 General obligation Improvement Bonds of 1977 November 1, 1977 May 1, 1992 General Obligation Improvement sonde of 1978 June 1, 1978 September 1, 3.992 It is further determined that sufficient funds are on deposit in the debt service funds or sinking funds for such bonds to effect the redemptions. 2. All the outstanding Improvement Bonds of 1966, Improvement Bonds of 1967, Improvement Bonds of 1967, Series B and General Obligation Improvement Bonds of 1973 which mature an or after October 1, 1993 are hereby called for prior redemption on October 1, 1992. All the outstanding General Obligation Refunding Bonds of 1976 which mature on or after January 1, 1993 are hereby called for prior redemption on July 1, 1992. All the outstanding General Obligation Improvement bonds of 1977 which mature on or after November 1, 1992 are hereby called for redemption on May 1, 1992. All the General Obligation Improvement Bonds of 1978 which mature on September 1, 1993 are hereby called for redemption on September 1, 1992. To effect such redemptions, the City Clerk shall cause notice thereof to be mailed to the paying agents for the bonds and to be published in the Northwestern Financial Review not less than 30 days prior to the redemption date for each issue as set forth in paragraph 1 above. The City Clerk is also authorized to take all such other action to effect such redemption as he may deem necessary and appropriate. 3. The City Council shall by subsequent resolution determine the disposition of remaining fund balances and future collections of special assessments with respect to the improvements financed by the bonds. MFF007A7.WPs I H • Agenda Information Memo March 2, 1992,City Council Meeting - RECEIVE FEASIBILITY REPORT/ORDER PUBLIC HEARING. (OAK CLIFF 6TH ADDN) G. Project 627, Receive Feasibility Report/Order Public Hearing (Oak Cliff 6th Addition - - Utilities)--In response to a petition submitted by the developer of the above-referenced subdivision, the Council authorized the preparation of a feasibility report for the installation of utilities to service this development. This feasibility report has been completed and is • being presented to the City Council for their consideration of scheduling a public hearing to formally present and discuss the proposed improvements. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To receive the feasibility report for Project 627 (Oak Cliff 6th Addition - Utilities) and schedule a public hearing to be held on April 9, 1992. VACATION/LOT 6. BLOCK 1, LAKESIDE ESTATES H. Vacate Utility Easement, Receive Petition/Order Public Hearing (Lot 6, Block 1, Lakeside Estates)--When the Lakeside Estates development was originally platted, there were no City utilities available. Subsequently, the City Council required that only every other lot could be built on due to its requirement to have an onsite septic system. Subsequently, every other lot was split in half thereby requiring each buildable site to consist of 1=2 lots. New drainage and utility easements were created down the center of every other lot to ensure there were adequate side lot easements. With the installation of utilities in 1979, this 11/2 lot requirement was no longer necessary. Subsequently, several houses were built on the previously split lots. Unfortunately, the newly dedicated side lot utility easement down the center of every other lot never was vacated in relationship to Lot 6, Block 1. Enclosed on page / is a letter sub tted by the applicant, on page /7 a location map of the subdivision, and on page ( a copy of the easement in question. Mr. Rosenberg has now petitioned the City to formally vacate this easement that lies beneath the middle of his house to clear up the title problems to facilitate the sale of his property. Mr. Rosenberg will be requesting the City to waive the application fee and refund it. All other application materials have been submitted and found to be in order for the Council to consider this petition and schedule a formal public hearing. The Council may also wish to consider the applicant's request regarding the waiver of the application fee. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED.ON THIS ITEM: To receive a petition and schedule a public hearing to consider the vacation of a utility easement over Lot 6, Block 1, Lakeside • Estates, and approve/deny the applicant's request to waive and refund the $300 application fee. ,,, • February 26, 1992 Mr. Richard L. Rosenberg 633 Atlantic Hills Drive Eagan, Minnesota 55123 Attn: Eagan City Council and Engineering Department In 1979, I bought the easterly half of lot six in Lakeside Estates from Leonard and Phyllis Chickett . At that time, I owned all of lot five, block one, and the westerly half of lot six block one, Lakeside Estates. I went to the Eagan City Council to see if I could get the lots divided into 100 foot lots instead of 150 foot lots. They okayed the 100 foot lots, so I then owned all of lots five and six. The council said they would send the information to Dakota County and have it added to the books. However, the easement between the east and west half of lot six was. never removed. I hope the city council will waive the $300.00 that is charged to remove the easement, correct the books, and resolve this as soon as possible, as I am refinancing my house. • I was not able to attend the meeting tonight because I belong to the Eagan Fire Department , and we have a meeting every Monday night. Thank you. 7 Sincerely, w ■!'7--_ Richard L. Rosenberg RLR/tcr • • • I (f) ., .4 , ' . ..,...,..:.1../Tcri l•' .. "1,../r.,7,1 z.,1 /.6.11-1 -. \ - ,--- ; ; • a. • c„ __.—4 ••••••. ..\ 1 . ../.1',. .0 ri - — —<..... i • i'.. . '. ';" .4 1 - .•&-t''. \ Ul c<\ , 7. `-,. .!;' • '` •I•. . IN) 4.„- py: . • !.....•• • . :, .,.......-' • • • _ • 1 -•,,,,, - .....+•.: •T r•s. ; • )•• • V. 9 • ' t. •• •• . . 1 * 9.• , .•''.' • - , . ■••'' .i. lir ..., •• ••••••".). A T'..! ,. • ..... . ...-- r•j . •: SUMMLR 1).. l' ■ " . r. ' ..,....7_ 1.-. . : .! ": :. . ,., .... _ ., .. — '----------., i. • 0 ". •0.9.. .,. .. Ai ''..5. ..! 0 e N .• : II • ..:• ,,, T.-•;. •:" .!. "4 ,,,,, .4 4 1. .,11.‘411.' 4'•• '....... .... es c .. • C - . • 6 rik . . . .,,,....... ,... . . , ..: ..-b, ; _ ....... .is. . , : .. . . .. e . • -.; . i. [ s . . i ;- ( • • .. .,' a. ..i. .-)t-•..,,tc •:....,±,-,T, ,--717—.„4., s• / s ..- - , ' .•1 ...ea lr- . .-. . - , . A . 411-1 - 4,....t..1P. ......■ : ., j1"1.4 L ' 0, • *. i ""al '. Ilse 11 I '--lirlirrikii a• • - ..1•PO l? , 'f 4'*.e• ' ---a;.-----F-------- "1. ' 10 .•t%V3I' •• . il; "\. r 4110 ___ 1.+.7o, s 2,- :'9"t 4,,'—' ,,,.., ••Ek•.• ,..1 p 4 i •/' . •0 , .. -11, i , $ 1 . M..:CI 7'3. . t 2 ; 1 i t, 4' . •■ .- 1 .- '; swi• ' it - '1-7;,•-■:.;.' • , • - .._ : .. 1 t . - 7 ti • a II COL." • -. Ilt,.4•1 1• .E...• .., ....:, .. ..."`5..F..-.....f.••1•••'•..t.a.i/..'.4.-..-i."--.-*.:',%'.,:,t.5-• •„....3....;'.;t.Z;di/./•/..../i.m.p.•. ...•.'•........f. t•!...*fti,t0,s.e.''t$.r•'os L:..w r,1-i f4 l„It•.,*1. . A l A•A\l• 1 I 1-_.-t,.I•I._■-•-•%.1..--%4-s•-•:..1 4fi'i,I:l*1 l •: ..:`C • . . ; . 0 II ,0 , ,,' ... - c.....-• 1. .,. L, .. .. .. - 4..% . .....;"■. . • W I 01' I' .2? . . • .... ....,... Z 1...99.■•• I 1 i : c . •.L. .............„„ •1,:. 7......... , i 1 ; air•Irt 1,,I. • ., 1 • . , g --.1 ../. 4.., '1%, . .. 006 • i ` I ... ll'n• . en. 1, ) 1 •e '''.- • 1 - A• . . ; ,... • ,. . 3.(... •.-. , . _,1' , -....... . •..••••' •• .,, --/ il„.....,....--- •• 1::. . / : :.V 0 • 1 0 e a Z i dt1 , I .1 •,. ::4 . ' ';;%■' Ab• ,.„ a), • t . T . ., > .... , t . . I e LP • .'”. . , ..•.!• ' :-...-__ 90 r''''''" '-'11.: Rk. av,..) tr$)0,137 • L 0 ,.....„...-- . .. •-•: 404 11PP) •• • • :. i.W. . .. I Will wi./04; • • ;. ; / •.,-.-- -, .,.:. F-- --":7'4*-4:1-,,-; f)tk' kro /1oeitr6 . . 0 • t SUPERIOR , 1- : .. . i. . ; ' a.; ' .: • •t . i . £c 1 • . :11,.., • i 11 ! / . .. '''.. COI;R-1 .a'--; 1,'t ,: 7 :t•d.S•• I I . R --==.:..:-.:1-- • ,,, 7-- 7 C .. ■ „ rg • a .. I - ......1k . k :: s I .,,. owl al 4.7_..7.1;Irgr-.a.u.c-diutt---4 ..:_,•,-.,. D.:4c ti,) ,-,5 Li '21 b • ... P`) M. '---. %,...-.!! 1A.0 NC.) aq fA 2-0 •■•• ...I ---Ir Tr-, -- • ,- pi., , , `.• to_ j ! ...er:% , ... . •----t- z--. rally's_ .1 NI S C-• . ,- ------- ---- -- tit ;1 1.t i t I. •...t,fario = ----- !. . — ----- oaf , , __ __ ,___ _ ..„ ,,:,, 04.1141■11111 t -...,■ c.1 , -1_%_■..) .•••••••i 6-V. .. ?.7)- ...) c.,.) -.._ • 0• 0 so.\?'- • ?C:.) D, . , , ..„,;.,, ... ..: - \2 . . . ..____ _:____-:....._ _______ _ ________,--- • • • • s • File No. 47896 Exhibit A PLAT DRAWING (THIS IS NOT A SURVEY) Lot 6 , Block 1, Lakeside! Estates, according to the recorded plat thereof , Dakota County, Minnesota OD . r____ 1. p • �' l , - S - UTI YI EAS s� I T Doc. y9g 71 ' iC UTi }� E'ti= rkEnsjY v. o Aub 30, 0977 l - -- y9P428 -��, :1s( I• S y 2,, 197j ./ „ 30” A , `+ EL.t JQ LOT 7 Z.114." tizi \l; I .. i ' , I '1 21, r _. 3d ........j ___.. ...___ _____L41:2 Li • 100 `' Allallt;C �� Hill Dr WE . scAe _ •s 0 Agenda Information Memo March 2, 1992 City Council Meeting SOUND INSULATION LOTTERY AUTHORIZATION I. Authorization, Lottery Selection, Part 150 Sound Insulation Program--At its regular meeting of January 7, 1992, the City Council adopted a sound insulation program for eligible residents of the City of Eagan through the Metropolitan Airports Commission's Part 150 Land Use Compatibility program. A description of the program as it is being implemented is enclosed on page ��. In late January,y� MAC staff informed the City that projects in cities around the airport would be funded in two cycles. The first cycle would require that individual residences be identified and submitted to the MAC no later than March 16, 1992 for construction to begin in early to mid-summer. The second round would require that eligible names be submitted by mid-July for construction beginning in early fall. In an effort to implement the program as early as possible and take advantage of the summer constructs n season, staff prepared correspondence and the application found on pages.2 through 3 and distributed them to eligible residents within the Cou ry ome Heights area. A depiction of the probable eligible area is included on page . To provide sufficient response time for eligible neighbors, a response date of March 9, 1992 was chosen. Unfortunately, this falls between Council meetings and the eligible names must be submitted to the MAC prior to the next City Council meeting. That being the case, staff is requesting authorization from the City Council to submit a list of eligible homes based upon the • description provided, giving first preference to those applicants who have lived in their homes since 1978 or earlier. The prioritized list will be provided to the City Council as an informative item at its next meeting. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To authorize staff to make the lottery selection from among the eligible applications received on or before March 9, 1992 and forward the prioritized list to the Metropolitan Airports Commission for consideration in the MAC Part 150 Sound Insulation Program. • CITY OF EAGAN SOUND INSULATION PROGRAM PROGRAM: The City of Eagan Sound Insulation Program is conducted in cooperation with the Metropolitan Airports Commission as a part of the Federal Aviation Administration's Part 150 Noise Compatibility Program. A description of the the program is attached. The City of Eagan will receive an annual allocation from the MAC to fund the program. The City will identify the homes to be insulated with the allocation. The MAC will coordinate the actual improvements and construction with the identified homeowners. The program will continue as long as FAA funds for this purpose are available to the MAC, until amended by the Eagan City Council or until all eligible homes have been insulated. The typical program cycle will run from September to September in accordance with the FAA fiscal year and program requirements. LOTTERY: The City's annual Sound Insulation Program funds will be allocated on the basis of a lottery. Selected homes will be chosen from those homes within the Ldn 65 contour as defined by the FAA and plotted by the MAC. Ldn 65 boundaries may be amended slightly to include the remainder of the homes in a block bisected by the contour. Homeowners in the eligible area interested in participating in the program will be asked to complete an application to be considered in the lottery. First priority will be given to homeowners who have owned and lived in their homes since 1978 or earlier. This date was chosen to correspond with airline deregulation since individuals living in the area prior to that time bought their homes in a significantly less noisy environment. Those who bought and occupied their homes after 1978 are eligible for the program, but only after the priority homes in any given funding cycle are insulated. Homeowners wishing to take advantage of the priority will be required to submit documentation of the date of their ownership. A new lottery will be held annually for each funding cycle of. the Sound Insulation Program. APPROVAL: The City of Eagan Sound Insulation Program was approved and authorized by the Eagan City Council at its regular meeting of January 7, 1992. aC) February 19, 1992 Dear Resident: In recent months you should have recieved information concerning the Metropolitan Airport Commission's Part 150 Land Use Program. That program will make sound insulation available for free to households within a noise contour defined by the Federal Aviation Administration. Your home is eligible for this program beginning in 1992 . Unfortunately, there is not enough money to cover the costs of insulating all of the eligible homes at once. As a result, the City of Eagan has decided that its annual funding allocation will be distributed on the basis of a lottery, with first priority given to residents who have lived in their homes continuously since 1978 or before. 1978 was chosen .because that was the year that airline deregulation took effect. Since then, operations at the airport have nearly tripled. All households in the eligible area can apply and if funds are available after the pre-1978 owner's homes have been treated, post-1978 owners may be funded as well. Enclosed you will find an application form which will permit you to be considered for the first year's lottery. To qualify for the pre-1978 priority, your application must be accompanied by appropriate documentation of the date of your ownership and residence of the property. At a minimum, such documentation shall include a photocopy of at least one of the following: 1) Contract for Deed, 2) Closing Statement, 3) Abstract of Title, 4) Abstractor's Ownership and Encumbrance Certificate, 5) Owner's Duplicate Certificate of Title or 6) Affidavits as required by the City if no other documentation is available. Such documentation is not necessary if you bought your home since 1978. This application will only be used to establish your priority in this year's lottery. The first list of homes will be drawn on March 13, 1992 . If your home is selected, you will receive a more detailed program application from the MAC later this spring. It is anticipated that actual construction would occur in late spring or early fall . If your home is not selected, you will continue to be eligible for the program and you may enter the lottery again in 0 future years. C:)-- Each year, the City will use its allocation to insulate as many 4 homes as possible. A new lottery will be held for each subsequent year when the City's annual allocations become available. If you have any questions concerning the lottery or the program, please contact Jon Hohenstein at 681-4600. Thank you and good luck. Sincerely, Tom Egan Mayor Enclosure 410 CITY OF EAGAN 1992 SOUND INSULATION PROGRAM LOTTERY APPLICATION Please complete and return this application no later than March 9, 1992 to be considered for the sound insulation program in 1992. NAME: ADDRESS: CITY: STATE: ZIP: NOTE: The City of Eagan will accept applications from all interested homeowners. The City will give first priority to individuals who have lived in their homes continuously since 1978 or earlier. If you wish to take advantage of this priority, you must indicate and document the date on which you purchased and occupied your home. DATE HOME PURCHASED AND OCCUPIED: DOCUMENTATION: Please attach a copy of at least one of the following to document the date indicated above: 1) Contract for Deed, 2) Closing Statement, 3) Abstract of Title, 4) Abstractor's Ownership and Encumbrance Certificate, 5) Owner's Duplicate Certificate of Title or 6) Affidavits as required by the City if no other documentation is available. CERTIFICATION: I (we) certify that I (we) own the property identified above and that the information contained in this application is true and complete to the best of my (our) knowledge. SIGNED: DATE: Owner SIGNED: DATE: Other Owner Applications must be received no later than March 9, 1992 . Return to: Sound Insulation Program City of Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55122 D.3 Ca a aney /or.w //e/S 's' . , T,'/ X'. L'ht z_..i pi, • .1. ro ---ra6i,i /, c( , 0 1: 141 4 0-5—,7-1 4 '47v6,„ —0,/:=--'5 le Y k ° , UPC, a . `?.`° 2�° ELIGIBLE 071 4, m C o� �I,2 K °O 3 - q i" ��_p ::°- AREA . ' m A C 7 ,�t; s .r ;? (DO V..1j1 CM , N• . tl'i°6 4r 4. - ■ cl. E to 1 o o ri Lr\ 9 5 '. K .. Cr' o 0 • • c b e ` c >v E`C n >,.4 N ' iX a a ?, \ ` N +; �' 'T�Es/C F w 0 0" o 9 I. 1� Q 4-)47 a ...- In 1 L (L • c• c\ ,i m \ 0 i ):.■ \'. rel%/..1\ . CI • , \ ''''S• • I'I lip i IJ ,I.: 4 r. 76J n [C V , �� 9 o ah \,,,. , \ V CN ' ''''' 4Illaa- ::>„).49, 0,k-t C9 '• N ;-.\)‘°-. v. z \Y-1 I 0,-t V /it\\ 2 A °\c't . ' K • `� „ a 3 3. 0 N / , `e v y :5-4:k121C;2 _ S�Lw�, d Cam: : F% I cr k' "� •—X , • ,* i 3 / t4 : O • 1 - .\., , / ,,, / — 139/ ' `' /� /3s v �'•' /141 i • CP ("( " Agenda Information Memo March 2, 1992, City Council Meeting RECEIVE FEASIBILITY REPT/ORDER PUBLIC HEARING (WOODLANDS NORTH 2ND ADDN) J. Project 630, Receive Feasibility Report/Order Public Hearing (Woodlands North 2nd Addition - Streets & Utilities)--In response to a petition submitted by the developer, the Council authorized the preparation of a feasibility report for the installation of streets and utilities within the above-referenced development. This report has now been completed and is being presented to the Council for their consideration of scheduling a public hearing to formally present and discuss these proposed improvements. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To receive the feasibility report for Project No. 630 (Woodlands North 2nd Addition- Streets & Utilities) and schedule a public hearing to be held on April 9, 1992. • 4S Agenda Information Memo March 2, 1992 City Council Meeting AUTHORIZATION OF LEMBKE SETTLEMENT K. Authorization of Lembke Settlement--On February 21, the City was represented by Annette Margarit of the City Attorney's office at a pre-trial hearing in the Lembke matter before Judge Thuet. A preliminary settlement was achieved subject to City Council approval. For details of the settlement please refer to a memo enclosed on pages .2 7 through.22. Acceptance of this stipulation will cancel a trial date that is set for March 5, 1992. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the preliminary settlement per the four conditions outlined in the attached memorandum from the City Attorney's office, as directed by Judge Thuet. • • FEB 26 '92 15:18 400 P03 MEMORANDUM TO: Tom Hedges, City Administrator FROM: City Attorney's Office/Annette M. Margarit DATE: February 21, 1992 RE: City of Eagan v. Lembke On February 21, 1992 I represented the City at the pre-trial hearing in the Lembke matter before Judge Thuet. At that time, with the Courts encouragement, a preliminary settlement was achieved, subject to City Council approval. The details of the settlement are as follows: 1. Mr. Lembke pled guilty to one of the four counts of operating a freight terminal without a conditional use 90 days jail and a sentence of 9 d uet imposed a Y 7 permit. Judge Th p that sentence for period of one $700.00 fine and stayed p year on the condition that Mr. Lembke comply with the remainder of the Stipulation. 2. All operation of the freight terminal would cease on or before March 27, 1992. 3. All debris would either be removed or placed inside the pole barn or house on the site by May 1, 1992. 4. As of this date, we are still negotiating the issues as to the City's portion of the $5,000.00 bond the City is currently holding as a condition to the 1986 Judgment. It was expressly stated on the record that this Stipulation was subject to the City Council's approval and that it would be presented to the Council on the March 2, 1992 meeting. If the Council does not approve this settlement, trial will be held on March 5, 1992. I believe this Settlement achieves the City's goals. Even if the City goes to trial on March 5, 1992 and is successful, the City has no control over when the Judge would issue his Order. It is certain that the Judge would not rule from the bench because of the magnitude of the constitutional issues involved, but would draft an Order with his findings and conclusions in the event Mr. Lembke would appeal the Judge granting the permanent injunction. The Judge would have 90 days from the date of trial to issue an order. Assuming the Judge would c:P --1 FEB 26 '92 15:19 400 PO4 • grant a permanent injunction,nent injunction there is also no guarantee as to when the Judge would make that injunction effective. On the record, Judge Thuet also stated that the City of Eagan may take whatever enforcement procedures are appropriate. The major enforcement procedure in place is that it Mr. Lembke does not cease operations by March 27, 1992 he is in violation of his probation resulting from his guilty plea and therefore would have to begin serving his 90-day sentence plus pay the $700.00 penalty. Z will be preparing a Stipulation in this matter that wit. be signed by Mr. Lembke's attorney and presented to the City Council for approval. For your information, it is Mr. Lembke's intention, according to his attorney, and upon his attorney's advice, to sell this parcel and move his operations to a much smaller parcel, 15 acre to 1 acre in size. The strategy here is to reduce Mr. Lembke's overhead expenses incurred through the $6, 000.00 per year property taxes. AMM/wkt cc: Jim Sheldon Agenda Information Memo 41 March 2, 1992 City Council Meeting wiysy mtc REZONING/PRELIMINARY PLAT WESTON HILLS ADDITION A. Rezoning,Weston Hills Addition/Lyman Development,of Approximately 64 Acres from an R-1 (Single Family) District and a Preliminary Plat Consisting of 132 Lots Located East of Highway 3, South of Cliff Road in the East 1/2 of Section 36—At its regular meeting of January 28, 1992, the Advisory Planning Commission considered the above referenced • applications for Weston Hills Addition. The item was previously before the City Council on February 4, 1992 at which time it was continued to permit staff and the developer to address 1) the second access to the development, 2) parkland area, and 3) traffic. With respect to access and traffic, please refer to the supplementary Community Development D 5partment staff report dated February 27, 1992 hich is enclosed on pages 3C)through C) for your review. Also enclosed on page 1992 is a memorandum from the Parks and Recreation Department with respect to the parks issue. The memorandum covers two parks department staff reports which are enclosed on pages CV 3 t_hrough St, and 5/ through (9 ( . The Advisory Parks, Recreation and l3atgral Resources Commission minutes with respect to this item are enclosed on page( Bised on their study and deliberations, the • commission is recommending that the City identify and purchase 4 - 6 acres south of the Weston Hills plat for develop nt as a neighborhood park to serve park service district 36E. Enclosed on pages Co through n �� are memos and letters from Police Chief Geagan, Fire Marshal Weglei er, City Attorney Sheldon's office, Glen VanWormer of Short, Ellitt and Hendrickson and Community Development Director Runkle concerning safety and traffic issues in this development. s By way of back nd from the February 4, 1992 City Council packet, enclosed on pages /l3 through GP you will find the original Community Develo ment Department staff . report with respect to this issue. Also enclosed on pages through l C,t are the Advisory Planning Commission minutes with respect to these ite . Please note that the Advisory Planning Commission added five conditions not contained in the staff report indicated as conditions 11 - 15 and that condition 8 has been augmented with respect to erosion control. The APC is recommending approval of the rezoning and denial of the preliminary plat on split votes. Also enclosed on page is a copy of the Inver Grove Heights city council minutes relative to this item. Finall , enclosed on pages/g /t A3 through g Q(are copies of correspondence from Eagan and Inver Grove Heights residents c ncerning this matter. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny 1) a rezoning for Weston Hills Addition/Lyman Development, of approximately 64 acres from A (agricultural) to an R-1 (single family) district and 2) a preliminary plat consisting of 132 0 lots located east of Highway 3, south of Cliff Road as presented. �ci MEMORANDUM • TO: TOM HEDGES, CITY ADMINISTRATOR FROM: DALE RUNKLE, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR DATE: FEBRUARY 27, 1992 RE: WESTON HMI S PRELIMINARY PLAT • At the February 4, 1992 City Council meeting, the City Council continued the Weston Hills Preliminary Plat for 30 days so staff could re-evaluate traffic, look at the possibility of a second access and the request to move up the installation of a semaphore at Cliff Road and Trunk Highway 3. Staff has had the opportunity to look at this development again as it relates to other developments within the City. Enclosed is a memorandum indicating other developments that have one access, the length of street, and number of units within each of the developments. The one most similar to Weston Hills is the development off Slater Road which has been in existence for approximately ten years. Systematic development has occurred through the Winkler-Jackson P.D. and the Huila property which eventually will have a second access to Burnsville on the south. This access is anticipated in one of the next phases of development. Also, enclosed are the other areas where there is a substantially long street with many existing houses Staff has reviewed this report with the fire and police departments for their comments on public safety. (Attached are copies of their responses and concerns regarding long single streets with only one access point). In review of the letters, it appears that the emergency safety aspect is not a concern to these existing properties, nor would they be a concern for the Weston Hills development if designed properly. Staff has requested the City Attorney's opinion regarding an emergency access to Weston Hills from Farm Road. Presently, there are two railroad crossings—one at Farm Road and one for a private drive providing access to the Paul Baer property. Attached is a copy of the City Attorney's opinion regarding the City's ability to use this for an emergency access if the main street into Weston Hills becomes block. Please find enclosed a letter from Glen VanWoermer, Eagan's Traffic Consultant, regarding the timing of the semaphore, as well as a projected dollar amount for this construction. There seems to be some concern regarding the funding of state and federal money if the project is moved up. Staff has also submitted a letter to the City of Inver Grove Heights for their help with this semaphore construction. At this time, we have not received a response from Inver Grove Heights and hopefully one will be received prior to the March 2 meeting. If you have any further questions or would like additional information, please advise. Community Development Director • DCR/js D M E M O R A N D U M 1 TO: Pat Geagan, Police Chief Dale Wegleitner, Fire Marshall PROM: Dale Runkle, Community Development Director DATE: February 10, 1992 SUBJECT: Safety Issues Relative to Subdivision Access At a recent City Council meeting, a question was raised regarding what potential safety issues, if any, may be peculiar to residential subdivisions having only one access point from the neighborhood to a main roadway. This question was raised relative to the proposed Weston Hills development, a 132 lot single-family subdivision to be served (initially) by a single access to Cliff Road. In order to respond to this safety question, I would appreciate your comments regarding any particular safety problems (eg. increased response time, difficulty in reaching a site in the event of an obstruction at the single access, etc. ) that have arisen at existing residential subdivisions with only one access road. To assist you in responding to this request, Planning staff has listed some of the existing residential subdivisions with only one access. Basic physical descriptions of these subdivisions are summarized on the attached list. I would appreciate receiving some . preliminary comments from you prior to Tuesday, February 18, 1992 . If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact me. unity Deve opment Director DCR/KCM Attachment 1 SAMPLE OP RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISIONS WITH SINGLE ACCESS POINTS ■ BLACKHAWK POND Roads Serving Neighborhood: Murphy Parkway, Hawk Place Access to Main Road: Murphy Parkway at Deerwood Drive Maximum Distance to Access Point: 3,350 feet Number of Lots Served by Access Point: 46 single-family lots ■ COUNTRY HOLLOW 2ND ADDITION Roads Serving Neighborhood: Countryside Drive, Countryview Drive, Country Court Access to Main Road: Countryside Drive at Diffley Road Maximum Distance to Access Point: 2, 150 feet Number of Lots Served by Access Point: 44 single-family lots ■ COUNTRY HOLLOW/COVENTRY PASS 2ND ADDITION Roads Serving Neighborhood: Countryside Drive, Autumn Oaks Court, Prairie Ridge Road, • Prairie Circle East, Prairie Circle West, Lantern Lane, Lantern Court, Witham Lane, Wildflower Way Access to Main Road: Countryside Drive at Diffley Road Maximum Distance to Access Point: 2,850 feet Number of Lots Served by Access Point: 122 single-family lots ■ LAKESIDE ESTATES Roads Serving Neighborhood: Atlantic Hill Drive, Superior Court, Erie Court, Huron Court, Michigan Court Access to Main Road: Atlantic Hill Drive at Dodd Road Maximum Distance to Access Point: 2, 300 feet Number of Lots Served by Access Point: 45 single-family lots - PAGE 1 - S . THE TRAILS OF THOMAS LAKE/THOMAS LAKE HEIGHTS 2ND ADDITION Roads Serving Neighborhood: Clemson Drive, Clemson Circle, Baylor Court Access to Main Road: Clemson Drive at Thomas Lake Road Maximum Distance to Access Point: 3,050 feet Number of Lots Served by Access Point: 232 townhouse units ■ WILDERNESS PARK 2ND & 3RD ADDITIONS Roads Serving Neighborhood: Capricorn Court, Aquarius Lane, Orion Lane, Lyra Court, Aries Court, Leo Court, Andromeda Way, Kaufmanis Way Access to Main Road: Capricorn Court at Wilderness Run Road Maximum Distance to Access Point: 2, 300 feet Number of Lots Served by Access Point: 83 single-family lots ■ SOUTHWEST EAGAN-CLIFF ROAD/CEDAR AVENUE Roads Serving Neighborhood: Slater Road, Storland Road, Rusten Road, Wildwood Street, Wyndmere Lane, Oak Cliff Drive, Mahogany Way, Burr Oak Street, James Street, James Court, White Oak Court, Slater Court, Woods Court, Storland Court, Whispering Trail, Whispering Court, Travelers Trail, Four Seasons Drive, Four Seasons Court Access to Main Road: Slater Road at Cliff Road Maximum Distance to Access Point: 5,200 feet Number of Lots Served by Access Point: 234 single-family lots - PAGE 2 - 33 F I ar ALA,* 'r u• INN i :* it • ESTRIDGE of • • -J • LA Lliag ) �;, i ,� FE .. A' MI JNTEREY I — ,;LO LA -J BLACKHAWK POND 31 0)) ENGLE- ,r �O . ACKH K - P ••••••••--_. ,• Y HI S R1 • c,\ I� ��. 1 r�, a.K �,w IRE DEPT: ,, Z --...1 ' \ • le a U -/ O.rte`giro , qi , CC Atk h • _t. • t 1 Y Pi✓E RT µ. . BL 4CKr1AWK 1ISEJ • - RTON *)I , . 4 i it, CIR • 1. • ...) I Ti D CIR tit.- KtNG ',,�.__. . .__ S ! V A•• DA AVERT 0 r :IR.a thONTICEI • AvE 414� •• 7. L tARTELL AVE 1 •... . 1 I i DEERW• • , ill 1 Airs TACONITE __ z a CARNEL n DI !/--PARK - / M.CT DEEI- • • .• • 8 1 MEADOWL• SW PATH S•`r I- a. S R I • a SKY •" K LN c i - I. LARK RD I 0 V 4 Y K• . .�. •" WL RK PT I I 1 Co Rd No 30 ) HEINE CT. " 777 1 1DILtY AD t 4 0 .4 t ^' 1 i FRONTAGE Rit • 3 -4 I V c . I II l .,,Z.,'..N •(( I —WANDERING WA • � " -r COUNTRY HOLLOW 2ND ADDITION jig i `f ILL PAve \D--4) o.n. :Y�-' � � w l��I � ' •. � � CIRC E CI' � � f)/ 'ILL NW =: DLERIDGE - v� �,r , L'? y,q BR r� r' - TH � (� K ,�� ANT ER GCE /RIDGE P \ - Is NANOVER . •Q O~ IRCL _ RE • � � �'.0 -' A.' : ./ °i.- 1 Ari , 146 r;\ . mpo C44?6G - 4(c._-_1 A. (A' \ • _ r A .4 \_____ t / AH. BFtADi RC --- Tr CI- G F B.CI . I k' ,,z- v /�� 2> �J• �� T . 6' L� < w•pRWF� `` z L'� ITHAM -AIR' 7 ct ►� _ ,r� L• • CIRCI 1 0 '�� o ILD 1 O WEST . • SO S WAY I!- Y n < a L> -gl cc 1.ANTE .►\LS.' I - uxF Jk t- i' I o C UR I N Z ON STON F • G r qVT cc 1. O. UMN • iiii CI 1 c u @ @ /19) . No 3Q ) :v 1 x11-1 1-i) -- ORK N PL 0 ? ' -� L N P L `� AA53.2...., � ' Q Ce � ,•cn l LA 1 ITT N CK ORE -' �, DR HACKMORE D '�' NE <44.... uti4j S CALV cr ix ..c e1 E4� t N . o ���p�J� ;11/1 7ATA. Imbor4 �KES/DE �i' . zo--1P-. • ...-- .3 ell,: , ....... JJ 040(1,5 _ J cs\ /.\ kr,RENT„,,,, Li ANDERING WAL K COUNTRY HOLLOW/ COVENTRY PASS 2ND ADDITION -1N1c . p •it. `C Q 3 •' LL W : _ RIDGE _ Iti• W . TN C 8R1 . t -'TuCK '��w ANTER R I DGE P I - A. RS• R • ;,• �• HANOVER .. ..airLiy. ft T. •k i -it; 4 I, ' ,s, lir. • . C? 0 V • 0— •a,` • -..s.....) Ai- . •H. BR Li*RD ,_. •' A .7- -- .,„.. ,-b ip,pci- Ls to CI 9L ,• R 'j ,•2 Cc !R 1 CIRCRI=I < DR• 8 0 •� . Ii _- WEST �c W 15s- ' ti w s--: � .� ■ NTRY (V • U N TE I �o e i •• .=` OXF , UR / _ = ; `o a K'IN ST.N --mil to �J CT o Tu.... o W \� o • 1 u> \I • No • p L.f t, tIlia, r •• - . I (''• @@4) f _L. • ' ? -. t I = •• ,,;- .1 IRI HACK p zo, NE a_ , ' ID A. .. C' .,(0,,,,,,„ I • 3 C.,,, • . .4 �CIRCL =r • , TE RY x JTP - 'L i E 6 ' LAKESIDE ESTATES • W D -..-.5)e V> d �+ No 30) IC__ �l(UV•' .0 @ via o .. ).. r P 12: N t ),��' 144 ,~ N PL `7 1 ��,ASSO� • 2 J•r • - ■ IRII•R MACK ORE • w ' " NE ...0.- �T Y ti IS 8 �., TfrAp c; n firES/DE'..%.,,,: c.e ,. +i a.. , „I.- ger .- -1-.. .. -, . A*0 Ro----- ...a - I . ss--\ '-' ‘w @ .iti, •~ -$: C .4 g z- � - .1,::20 S l r'---7 ....,,4,If:4 : ,*,15. 4401- jo wim, • N. Y LAKE R °GE l .., kit ...$)^. "A„E illill.-oP E,F l' F r___ .... ,. �r OAK POND ' ..c •• .17 \ I MI•• 1 NW o I NE4,• • 31 ir 'r LL w 7€ THE TRAILS OF THOMAS LAKE/ *1' . THOMAS LAKE HEIGHTS 2ND ADDITION • / :° CT '' C SW PATH H• •. o l S a T K' N Uv o LARK RD WL RK PT �' Q O If i 1 0 rwoou Co Rd No 30 ) HEINE CT. ,i. . i �- _ • ' [DTLtY—R. • . 4I 0 Y� yr:7:A+% i� MIMIC i' 5 i • Q �d : _.; T .=R' I ' f 4-Sum• ' .:IEMSON E 5-FIR ' �� �_ ! ` 8At 9 . , S1 P \ NE '' LEO•AE , c @ -- :e P- r ry 8qr� e,,P~ ;n V __,..L le ,. .. t :vERGREf . s } 10INk. ESTUNG PARK - CIR. - (6) /AE TA . i •� . • c', j / . ' Qt' 0 ,r 'r. L.i/ 4. ��d �� P�� THOr1IAS a �;• 1 tK P LAKE r.., C �� ,i 1 F10M AS �n . k4ALLAR. ‘47 SW i ', ARD 2 • ;, k.�"—' :' itiftli HILL iCK RAIL = + 1-y �►� , <•Da- t i � HICKORY �S, �' in �` CENTEr A P w Y ..3,6_.....0 1 e L 1 e� 7 WALNU g( o /T£ I f( ki a 9'�,f o ��; f� w ARK 0 ,3 ? . 0 HI FORD.tit ,cepy S RQ [-v •. 1� ` MNORTNV/(W „n1 PARK �/� WILDERNESS DERNESS PARK 2ND c & 3RD ADDITIONS L-4 ;a Q►-i- l , .,,... I �'* A. W 3 z� ? L OIFraY R 1 Z w o ..,i‘... 7_-; - P A R RK K a ,I � " ► ''� D. a LJ z • -L •f' -KE c, o` �I j • NG" 14 P K E _• EX• . PT .► r ` • jZ p 4, RA1L(; aro s z OQAT H ILL• 'e' o FMK E Q u - N - W4LNUT 1.7) / ■ ipP_,IVAIrP41-6). _,, .I.Lre* -it, iii, iv, 'c\ • 4( C7.10 : 4.1 1.-t EAF v �C-� \P SW WATEF �CIR k.: • a�� 4.. DF I DU RRY: F —)6",----7-*--TTA------ o 0 Akar*:. ci:b 6P. P \ „p II. '4i -. x O zt : to Z �` 1_, _i :......_---.t/-,S---k. 1 CLIFF RD. .)6,-,\ 1 i(17:::: ; tk Ilk • 31 ■ 1 I Rear IN ) • SOUTHWEST EAGAN CLIFF ROAD/SLATER ROAD ) ts . s • . . ‘i . —`-- )) 1 1( , a i r z o CENTER cr cc_ _ �r 101,_41.;T Co R._ 3 % i '�i 4 -RA ipii:,4, hi RAMN WAY - rf- Q " in . • ,� Q WYN':� . i NANCY 'j 4;I 4, c� LN. _. ` - u IR 1"--1 TTLE -•*4 r * thi 2 ' . • _ . ■ . . ' .: " . 1 Y \—._ik..'• a V19lTRNll� fa, 1 g K c s 3 x In .-.2 • tegla v JAM 0, O /444 LA. 4c41/ 1 ' ; - -. I A), KINGS 1 I 1%); ,,- I.. A r O� IN piN hT' +` - Ju ` � r ` •�_ iITJ SE t. SW fir A iiiii...--04 / ".6Lis....i. .'4:: i I I I I? i • LI-, 0 MEMORANDUM TO: TOM HEDGES, CITY ADMINISTRATOR HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL FROM: KEN VRAA, DIRECTOR OF PARKS & RECREATION DATE: FEBRUARY 25, 1992 RE: WESTON HILLS - SERVICE SECTION #36E ADVISORY PARKS, RECREATION & NATURAL RESOURCE COMMISSION RECOMMENDATIONS BACKGROUND Attached and identified as Pages through is a memo prepared for the Advisory Parks,Recreation and Natural Resource Commission for their December 1991,Commission meeting. The memo addresses the necessity of reviewing Park Service Section #36 E for park needs as a result of a proposed preliminary plat application that was then coming to the City entitled Weston Hills. Pursuant to the direction given at that December meeting, staff began a review process for the Park Service District. At the January, 1992, Commission meeting, the Commission reviewed staffs report. (Attached on Pages through ). This report reviewed three potential areas for a park within Park Service District #36E. One search area was located within the Weston Hills plat, another was in Inver Grove Heights and a third search site was located south of the Weston Hills plat. After review of the site, the Advisory Parks, Recreation and Natural Resource Commission recommended that the City secure a park within this park service district, and that the park be located south of the Weston Hills plat. Attached for your review are the minutes from the January Commission meeting, including this recommendation. SUMMARY The Advisory Parks, Recreation and Natural Resource Commission reviewed the need for a park within Park Service Section #36E, and has concluded that a park is necessary. The proposed neighborhood park should be in the four to six acre range and shall be located south of the Weston Hills plat. It is unlikely that this park would come via the dedication process, because no single parcel is large enough to provide such dedication. Therefore, the City should actively pursue the purchase of land, and if necessary, pursue condemnation in the event that a purchase can not be negotiated. FOR COUNCIL ACTION To provide direction to City staff to identify a neighborhood park within Park Service Department 36 E;and to pursue acquisitions via negotiations with property owners to secure a park of 4 to 6 acres in size. • KV/bls t4 ■ MEMORANDUM TO: ADVISORY PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL • RESOURCE COMMISSION FROM: STEPHEN SULLIVAN, LANDSCAPE ARCtIII ECT/PARKS PLANNER DATE: NOVEMBER 26, 1991 RE: PARK SERVICE AREA 36E PARKS NEEDS STUDY pa'Air curl d An application has been received by the City of Eagan for the platting of 136 single family units on 63.64 acres. The Weston Hills preliminary plat is located south of Cliff Road and east of State Highway #3. .- • jY— iz_ • -- - e_ The parcel is within Park Service Area - - , . 36E. The development activity with the p E--- .. o rte'• platting request for the Weston Hills . Subdivision facilitates the need for a parks -' :;. . ■ � le study of Park Service Area 36E. The =:d. w t stud} process is intended to be separated - ..• . -''1? g �� . ° W into tuo pans: The first study phase is the - :;'� ��: _ i W Commission's determination whether a 4* . . park is needed within Park Service Area Or 444 :.., d o 36E. This evaluation will take place at the / .1. O/ 4,O_ sW s4� pv0�.� > December 5 Advisory Parks, Recreation ,� a I T ;_ and Natural Resources Commission , oameeting. /, ��,i ��` ' 0. Figure #1 Area Location Map //Agt/ o a�'�0� . 1 ,_ Eltraggili Staff will provide the Commission with the following information for their evaluation. 1. Eagan Parks Standards 2. Park Service Area Demographics 3. Comparison to other Park Service Areas . 4. Typical Service Area needs S. Site Location 6. Typical Facility Programs 7. Cooperative Community Park Scenario • Park Service Area 36E • November 26, 1991 Page 2 If the Commission recommends the need for parkland acquisition within Park Service Area 36E, staff will then proceed with the second phase of the parkland study. This phase will identify a specific site or sites for parkland acquisition. The Commission would evaluate potential parkland acquisitions at the January 9 Advisory Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission meeting. Staff would provide the Commission with the following information for their evaluation: . 1. Site Specific Parkland Acquisition Alternatives 2. Service Area Efficiencies • 3. Development Efficiencies 4. Site Attributes 5. Facility Program Potential 6. Acquisition Process & Timeframe Cont7rehensiye Parks System Plan In 19S: the City of Eagan adopted a Comprehensive Park System Plan. This working document provides the framework for development, acquisition, funding and parkland standards for Eagan's Park System. Since its inception, this document has been the basis • for all planning efforts within Eagan's park system. This report will rely on the proven strength of the Comprehensive Parks Systems Plan. The Comprehensive Parks /. System Plan identifies six (6) - ` • planning districts. The _ . - districts are based on a / _ geographic population j - ' .� � -c� 'Amok. � � t25 context which overlay _ _411firMit- provide several neighborhood park .: ,== � service areas. This districts - '.the basis for -R equitable distribution of iN .,• parkland and facilities P` ;Fr / within the City of Eagan. j M --S The study area is located lip . _ ,�within Planning District #5. - g 3.211r11-1 - y r7 21 STUDY ARE\7.47 tw V , III - Figure 2 Park Planning Districts Park Service Area 36E November 26, 1991 Page 3 The Comprehensive Parks Systems Plan further distills the City of Eagan into 38 Neighborhood Park Service Areas. The intent of this "designation" is to meet recreation needs within a neighborhood park which is accessible and within reasonable proximity to all residents in Eagan. This study is located within Neighborhood Park Service Area #36E which is not currently served by any park .The Comprehensive Parks Systems Plan does not specifically recommend a parkland acquisition with Park Service Area *36E but mentions the potential of a joint development park between the cities of Eagan and Inver Grove Heights. < 11.:y.ref-: • •faro, • e •' ri in 7.z. :7 ,..' c,:: , ..-:,--,: ,„ 0- IN 'QV -...-_rt... �. • � . ! •' -' 0v..-. er. ":. .,,..1/14.W:7. 1 Ar I Ie..f) '‘''a.t,/ 16 t r*X'� • ' •• i' _ P..'s , 771 . _ r ... • a ,..c.„ , ,- ,ii TO ... -. Ifr.::;77.5„.,_,,r,.7:7.joi-, /-- M, r �, r _ a op) 11% . ` ' i Arzyig . , I _ ' •Et•.1.1..aws -- AV - ' - oka-J 41.20r- '. ..'" - A_ grin" — r. -, ,-wa.- Tirlityritixf ir ...,,e _ lle j,17:-4 .. 1: iiillil ' _ :i‘r..liiiii i ti g- +.t • . r "1r.w w.l w`i"u.. Figure *3 Neighborhood Park Service Areas The Park System Plan as a result of "specialization" has developed classifications and corresponding standards. These parkland classifications are as follows: 1. Mini-Park 2. Community Park 7. Special Use Park 2. Neighborhood Park S. Linear Park 8. School Park 3. Community Athletic Field 6. Historic Park 9. Regional Park • / Park Service Area *36E November 26, 1991 Page 4 The scope of this report will focus on the classifications and standards in regards to the need for either a mini-park or neighborhood park. A "mini-park" is defined as a park for local recreation which is not large enough to be a complete Neighborhood Park. The mini-park may either serve a smaller service area or provide only a limited number of facilities. The site must be usable for its intended purpose and is not intended to be a "catch all" classification. The typical mini-park provides very limited and basic facilities such as play equipment or an open field games area. Several mini-parks within a Park Service Area could collectively be considered as a Neighborhood Park if each of the Mini-Parks contained one or more of the necessary components of a complete Neighborhood Park. Ideally, a city• would have no mini-parks. They are only provided when there is a park need in an area which cannot be fulfilled in any other way. • A "neighborhood park" is defined as a park designed primarily for local, recreational activities on a park service area basis. Neighborhood parks are the basic unit and will be the most common type of park in the system. Facilities provided in the basic neighborhood park are a 250' x 250' open field game area, paved hard courts games area and trails, play equipment facilities for preschool and elementary age children and a passive or natural area. Optional facilities which may be found here are improved ballfields, soccer fields, tennis • courts, hockey and skating rinks and parking. The optimal service area is usually within 1/2 mile radius and should not extend beyond major access barriers. A neighborhood park must be a minimum of 4 acres but is typically 8 to 12 acres. CO'.4?O. USE SERVICE SITE SITE SITE E'EN; AREA ATTRIBUTES LOCATION Serves a concentrated Services a Size Some portion High density population specific age small varies of the site mast neighborhood (Cr Jura- group,or provides crib service but be suitable for s where dim or or limited facilities on a area, viable the epee&use typical private prrvau) local basis. Typically usually less area is which required yards do not mini parks provide only than 1/4 typically the site. mast.May be one or two basic mile 1 to 4 by Manion: facilities such as play radius, acres. such as equip:nem,open kid population apartment pores area,or a short served is sompleass, trail. at Mast townhouse Soo developments moideau. oe tammerdie centers. !�c;e.•,'�c*. Area for Jag) Optional Ten Physiography Autenble to ho:.Park recreational activities service sere suited for intended • such as a 250's 230' mu is • mini- femme servile area. open field Ames area, tonally mum:is development. More active paved hard mutts within a typically Some natural parb need (Cut,furu• pores area,nails,play 112 mile 20 to 12 amenities are better am d)mor) equipment for preschool radius. acres desirable but to collector and elementary age Service bit may not required. atreeu. children and a passive should not be as Must have at or natural area. ascend brie as least S0'of On ioya;facilities may beyond 20 frontage on a • include improved major acres. "Mc lifter' b 1 elds,soccer Gelds, • barriers so tennis courts.bocke' access riots.skating riots and 3,000 to parking facilities. 3.000 population tared. APT'!4 Part Sam arils r�S Park Service Area #36E November 26, 1991 Page 5 • • Inventory'Analysis The Park Service Area is comprised of interim type land uses. The 64 acre Weston Hills parcel is located within the northern 1/3 of the Park Service Area and is characterized by a farmstead and pasture. The southern half of the Park Service Area is comprised of other farmsteads. 5-10 acre single family lots, a 40 acre tree farm and an 8 acre light industrial plat called Halley's 1st Addition. The Comprehensive Land Use Plan designates D-1 residential (0-3 units per acre) for the entire geographic Park Service Area. The developmental timeframe is uncertain but with the extension of roads and trunk utilities via the Weston Hills Subdivision will facilitate the developmental potential of the adjacent parcels. The current population of Park Service Area #36E is estimated at approximately 30-50 development residents. The buildout population 100% velo of the Park. Service Area based on a comparative e sam lin of buildout to D-1 residential is 1287 residents. The following is p sampling populations for other Park Service Areas: Park Service Area Park Buildout Population # 2 Lexington Park 324 # 3 Country Home Park 249 #20 Blackhawk Park 1537 • #24 Captain Dodd Park 1221 #31E Kettle Park 495 #34 Ohmann Park 792 #36W Manor Lake Addition 1251 #36E Study Area 1287 Figure #5 Park Service Area Buildout Comparisons This demographic information indicates that Park Service Areas of similar buildout population typically support parks of varying classifications. Park Service Area 36E is approximately 1 mile in length in a north/south orientation and varies from 1/8 mile to 112 mile in width along the east to west axis. The geometric configuration does not accommodate the service standards of a V. mile radius for a mini- park. The 1/2 mile radius standard for a neighborhood park serves a majority of the Park Service Area when located centrally. • Park Service Area #36E November 26, 1991 Page 6 Based on this central orientation providing the greatest service coverage and the Commission's recommendation of park need, staff would concentrate the acquisition study within this defined area. A joint community park scenario may reorient the study area easterly covering the potential service population within Inver Grove Heights. . II I A�iiirK • r lV ..,..1 .40. i ,..,.. 1 am IN . Ait , • I 1/4 MILE RADIUS , , -won; ;411 L I . '4/ r. P.S.A. *36E I . se A_1 Figure #6 Service Area Coverage The review of similar Park Service Areas in comparison to 36E concludes parks with a range • in facility programs, site attributes and acreage. Typically, all parks meet facility program and standards of a mini-park as outlined within Figure #4. Other similar Park Service Areas such as 31E, which is served by Kettle Park, provide a host of facilities, site attributes and acreage characteristic of neighborhood park standards. These differences do not show inconsistencies of the Comprehensive Parks Systems Plan as much as individual parks exceeding basic standards through opportunistic and effective planning. The typical park characteristic for Park Service Area 36E may have a facility program including a playground, hardcourt, open play area, trails, picnic area, passive area and parking lot. The acreage range of similar Park Service Areas range from 3 . 7 acres. The acreage and facility program for a park within Park Service Area #36E would change with the joint community park scenario. Increased user population would typically increase facility types • and level of design. Acreage requirement may also increase dependent upon the revised facilin program and projected level of use. • Park Service Area #36E November 26, 1991 Page 7 The City's Comprehensive Guide Plan, completed in the early 1980's concluded that "...this • area can best be planned with the adjacent area in Inver Grove Heights...A joint agreement between the cities should be developed at that time with a jointly planned parks facility." The Inver Grove Heights Park Department has been contacted and is currently evaluating the potential of a shared park. This scenario, although foreign to Eagan, has been undertaken successfully by several communities within the Twin Cities Metropolitan area. Eagan staff will be working with Inver Grove Heights in determining the viability of a joint park. The timeframe for this evaluation is intended to dovetail with the site selection phase . of the study if deemed necessary by the Commission. • ash The Commission may also want to consider or review the alternative of accepting a cash dedication (136 x 700 - 95,200) and to utilize those proceeds to enhance the parks opportunities in Park Service Section 36-W. This area is within the 1/2 mile radius, but is separated by a major transportation barrier. Suit rr. The platting application of Weston Hills Subdivision facilitates the need for a study of Park Service Area #36E. The study process is separated into 2 parts with the first being the determination of whether a park is needed within Park Service Area 36E and the second phase being the selection of an appropriate park site. The Comprehensive Parks System fib Plan suggests the possibility of a joint park with Inver Grove Heights. This scenario is currently being reviewed by both Cities. The buildout population of Park Service Area #36E exceeds minimum standards of a mini- park classification. Typically, existing Park Service Areas of similar demographics to Park Service Area 36E are served by parks ranging in classification from mini-parks to neighborhood parks. The Advisory Parks, Recreation and Natural Resource Commission will need to evaluate and make recommendations whether a park is needed within Park Service Area 36E. For Commission Action. The Advisory Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission may consider the following recommendations: • 1. A park is needed within Park Service Area #36E. Staff should begin identifying potential park sites. 2. No park is needed within Park Service Area 36E. Park needs can be adequately met with an enhanced park in #36W. 3. The City should rely on Inver Grove Heights to provide any needed park amenities. • SS`nh �$ TO: PARKS, RECREATION, AND NATURAL RESOURCES COMMISSION FROM: RICH BRASCH WATER RESOURCES COORDINATOR DATE: DECEMBER 2 , 1991 RE: WATER QUALITY DEDICATION REQUIREMENTS FOR WESTON HILLS DEVELOPMENT. Ir.troducticn The Weston Hills development is a 64 acre, 132 unit residential development located south and east of the intersection of Cliff Road and Highway 3 in the NE 1/4 of Section 36 in southeast Eagan (Figure 1) . Storm water drainage from approximately 60 acres of the developed site will discharge to Pond LP-27, a 3.2 acre pond classified for wildlife habitat in the City's water quality management plan. LP-27 will discharge to LP-26, currently classified to support indirect contact recreation. Other downstream waters potentially affected by the proposed development include Manor Lake (LP-28) , Hay Lake (LP-31) , and Schwanz Lake (LP- 32 ) which are classified as indirect contact, indirect contact, and direct contact recreation lakes, respectively. Water Quality Analysis Because of the high value of many of the water bodies immediately downstream from the development, staff recommends that the City require on-site ponding to meet the mitigation requirements of the Eagan water quality management plan. After reviewing and discussing the preliminary site plan with the developers, an analysis was conducted to determine the size and location of the treatment ponds. Based on this preliminary analysis, two ponds will be needed to meet the requisite treatment standards. One pond of about . 6 acres in surface area and 2 acre-feet in wet volume will be created by deepening a small semi-permanently flooded wetland in the northwest corner of the site along 'Highway 3 to treat runoff from about 20 acres. Another two-cell pond with a surface area of approximately .8 acres and a wet volume of 3-3.5 acre-feet will be necessary to adequately treat the runoff from the • remainder of the site before it is discharged to Pond LP-27. Issues for Commission Consideration Assuming the Commission concurs with the rationale to require ponding instead of a cash dedication for this development, there is • another issue that could arise. The initial location for the two- cell pond would have placed it in an area between LP-27 and Highway 3 which contains a pocket of high value mixed hardwood and softwood trees in a larger softwood tree stand dominated by aspens. At a meeting on Wednesday, November 27, City staff requested that the developer evaluate other locations for the pond that would preserve the mixed hardwood/softwood stand and still meet the water quality treatment requirements. The results of that evaluation will be available in time for discussion during Thursday's Commission's . meeting. Depending on the outcome of that evaluation, staff may need direction from the Commission on how best to weigh the relative values of water quality protection, tree preservation, and the developer's desire to maintain site integrity and minimize the loss of potential home sites. . Rich Brasch Water Resources Coordinator • cc. Steve Sullivan John Wingard • • 111 sP- :....v..7.--ri.. Ir., • 0. •-.74 ---- ....1/4r c*-=*.iv." -/ 1 amom•S4'•. .b.',: . - 7- L. v 4IIMP T 1 .: s* 4t.th sc -• .*:- t'■ 1.,.' ..•%'^' - ...241 ''---- i J 1 •r..e.. — --•-• . ..a,N:..-• 4... *A.. ...-_, • ' -C. JP-2 ../.:%•4P-z5 , ,- , :,..-• 0-- 1 ci..v I l ,.(1 : , .-....,., , Figure ] 4t2' •-., • . .r• JP-25.1 ii - 1 3 JP-22 -- CL.V 7.4 :c -1. „•••■:::. CL• :AU,. ,I-- --e...-. . ,,,.-- alkl1/4!'-Z 44152 1 - 7. CL._V ii 17_ , r.,.-..!-- .........._..zmi: •- -VOW . •:•tt... ......t.-.:7"--47_ \ 11..S-ilS"--.. _ ;ZZ..."'Z',-,,,,/a7:—.V.Wrt‘ • krp.s,-.41.• ti.....s--- — -, 1.-• 1 ■ I ---- ...-..11,00• I I ‘-•3‘ •i•••:.: •:= C L V N•-- •.:tie • L•V ' • -.7: _ '- *- , GP-69 4 • .7 • ' • .'..-- JP-5I :1,..1.•. t\I- ), C I. VII zzi......a..• - t • 7.WEE=1-....ora„... i.1., .c• . . ' . ._ usersors vi so at . ,.•(.,$..- . . ,x. . .2_• -I..._,'•'''7.....LS=--=--= Eta... .. r - . _-L.■-•• / • • i •rs71.:1a.- •LC 4%1 ...,"-.,-....i.-9 .1g7-68 JP-5 c iv CL. V .— ' ' - ,toio,r I • ., ,.. 26.-e,s../ .----4, . - -••••••■_ ,•••"---- ...-- -....— -..'k -•- • Le LI 1N.' 1:11:--. - -..)911117.--- --- a: =-r-arraa====SCIMmem--4%ftil. ‘ "'1/4-t -• '' , - -‘ ° .;.s. ot...............„, sum.eliamen - _.-Joist •,FARM iwkwasl-. ---- — _' • =:SIM tr.4 0 - --■ Lp-6 Li Yier., .74._ _ b 4.1 i ..., 1 ,......aloe= ------- —44--- - c L6v., -Jci.. _ . CL.V - ' •. 4._. • SCIt MI% / 7 •-lilik . 2*--"-i----n5 . j ft''' - c.ariaL, - .....--;-. Da • S. V t e..,...- alga i ; 4..0 -" --• r % \t--;:.,„ ' - :--„. '...„ 404 - di- l'a 2°' .-egeZtre ' 1410$*. - • ` a -1 •. -to-.z.- -- - -4 4'- ... ...'•••■••• b..-----'--ak. - ::,:N-241. '-- . " ••• . . t .... •ft. . \ . ..._ ! -1:0r132.•■ ' t=iY I.1.1.44%:._ l''ISilit .- ""AilPitt4V ' • • 4.t"---."'"::- ZW:14:...• -- - ....-- L -1/. 0-3•7 Ow-- • . .. 4hidert. .,41100V ...Or■ a. - Tr.-- `...-% -., ..- ,.. _ . -C:. II - 1 •'' -i ....:--- . 'It-- 4 yit;xii.,...... , • '-'-',\I to .5 .roicTla•-;=:.:- ' ----,'. • LP-67 ... .... ,.. - 71..? --•— ,:•j■- P-17 - C . VII •50 ----4.4,27-_2( ____..,--;-- • cLIE ..1--je- ......44,i,-.-- *--:;_ ..- .; --`..- •:_t-J2e.. "1 -1/4\--4,.2:Li1V. L. 11 iczy.L.:...____:- __.::. •- ..-_-,....- .7.- . __.„,Aitaill ... 4 ... . _.•'..._,. .,... L V / ' -- , .._ 's-lh. :. II \,.-- ;at ' .. ....OK 1■414' L P-36 _.....-ir- / - -- - - 1.r•6 E - N'' ' C L 1 ' '-- •Ir - -__ .i . 12.)50---,I-- • '• -- • ''. C L I Io _ i... , - ■ • i - • . - e \--41-'re* I-0, .....e■ . 1 — ' - .1/4' . : .I „Ir_- - -, . _ . L=-2: -. ^ -..:. ..-• - , " '.\ e L .21 : LP-24 % CL tv Jir Ci.. i " 1?.. Le L i-V CL.11 1. e; •. 4 ! y (-)( #.11".Ift' A: , ,2' • . . . ■ V i .- 2 4 ii... _ iv..... . _ 0 i ...,. :... ,, ‘.. ......•.:.::: _ ,..•19 _ ............ 1..0.1 .._... .... C L. i ta...--11151.5 ▪..--1 illiiNai -. -0•15 .. :_ II .10.0.se L D•22 • I i... ...... I :•*SC- -gr---11836-...--_-5 Area Of DevelopThel , ca..Ti tri "'....; :,... Iv •• -.... )..6"1 LP-l• 7.:.0% • Za D w. ... I: i .... 0.17 I■ '' g ...-.-- 7inegirincts:■ It ._. . .....or•-•■■•—•--eit.—-- - -- 1.••••■■■.../ Vt."-it .401110..- , .-L--------- ......■... , 4 • / 114 / / / P • . ...._ , -P•I 1 . :., VII •Lel•'-:.. R0/11DADUN , ■•.•■.1 i I. CD> •Cmi. ,•.' vie \/4,4o" . ‘.1 7t• jj, , ///i ( 6.11•1 sj . • • 3EMENT „000illikk ‘ j PLAN 9 am' to:c sax- N I. C set li.to I Ohm ATERBODIES ti Serostrso. *nem Amor*& Arascurto . 011.■•• I ■ 01111111nt Aii . APRIL 1990 MEMORANDUM TO: ADVISORY PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL RESOURCES COMMISSION FROM:,`I KEN VRAA, DIRECTOR OF PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL RESOURCES STEPHEN SULLIVAN, PARK PLANNER/LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT • DATE: JANUARY 3, 1992 RE: PARK SERVICE AREA 36 E - PARKS AREA STUDY • BACKGROUND The Advisory Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission at the December 5th meeting made recommendations regarding the need for a park within Park Service Area 36E. The Commission requested staff to evaluate potential park site acquisition areas which could service the park service area. The Park Service Area is located south of Cliff Road, east of State Highway 3, north of the City of Rosemount and west of the City of Inver Grove Heights. (See Figure #1) This area is currently comprised of interim type land uses. 4) The Comprehensive Land Use Plan designates the entire area for single family residential at 0-3 units per acre. The developmental time frame for Park Service Area 36E is • unpredictable. The platting of the Weston Hills Addition facilitates the development potential of the remaining undeveloped parcels via the extension of roadways and utilities. $COPE OF MEMORANDUM • The scope of this memorandum reviews large park study areas. The study evaluates two sites within Park Service Area 36E and one located within Inver Grove Heights. (See Figure #2) The primary criteria of review for each study area are: 1. Standard site analysis items i.e, topography, drainage, vegetation, etc. 2. Development efficiencies and constraints. 3. Service area efficiencies and constraints. 4. Acquisition considerations. • 5. Economic considerations. • PARK SERVICE AREA 36E • PAGE TWO - ANALYSIS - COMPREHENSIVE PARKS SYSTEMS PLAN The Comprehensive Parks System Plan does not specifically indicate a parkland acquisition within Park Service Area #36E,but instead mentions the possibility of a joint park between the Cities of Inver Grove Heights and Eagan. Based on the joint park concept staff has re-defined P.S.A. #36E to include an area within Inver Grove Heights which lies south of Cliff Road, north of Rosemount and West of County Road #73. The newly defined Park Service Area is approximately 1-1/4 miles in length by 1 mile in width. A centrally located park (i.e., Park Study Area #1 & #3) would place the park within 3/4 of a mile of all residents. The build out population for both communities within this Park Service Area is approximately 1,700. Eagan's Comprehensive Parks System Plan defines mini-parks as serving a minimum of 500 residents within a 1/4 mile radius. The mini-park parcel size is typically 1-4 acres. A mini park facility program is typically an open play area and playground. Resource based facilities and site requirements are typically not utilized within mini-parks. Eagan's Comprehensive Parks System Plan defines a neighborhood park serving 2,000 - 5,000 residents within a 1/2 mile radius. The facility program is enhanced by including hardcourts, parking lots, trails and miscellaneous resource based facilities. The parcel size 411 is typically 10 - 20 acres. Based on this criteria, it appears that the 1,700 build-out population and the re-defined service area size has a closer reflected need to a neighborhood park than a mini-park. A second approach is to service only the residents of Eagan within Park Service Area #36E. A centrally located park within the Park Service Area (i.e., Study Area #2 & #3) would serve a majority of the population within a half mile radius. This is consistent with Eagan's typical neighborhood park classification standard. The build out population for Park Service Area 36E is approximately 1,287. The service population meets the 500 minimum for the mini-park yet falls short of the 2,000 - 5,000 service population for a neighborhood park. Service areas of similar population demographics include the recently platted Manor Lake Addition "Park Area" and Captain Dodd Park. Both park areas contain approximately 5 -7 acres for active type facilities such as hard courts, open play area or overlay fields,playground and parking lot. Captain Dodd Park also includes another 7 acres for a resource based trail which circles a pond. Manor Lake Addition park area is less resource oriented with a spur trail to a canoe launch on a small lake. These parks typically support a bias toward basic active neighborhood facilities at a limited development scale (i.e., open play area or field overlay in lieu of separate full scale play fields, half hardcourts, smaller playgrounds. As well, the resource based facilities have a secondary bias to the active based facilities. This secondary bias, as in the case of Captain Dodd Park, does not preclude opportunistic design or acquisition. Staff's evaluation • using these two parks as typical examples indicate a hybrid park classification which serves 63 • PARK SERVICE AREA 36E PAGE THREE • populations larger than the 500 mini-park criteria and less than the 2,000 neighborhood park standard. These hybrid parks typically have service areas typical of neighborhood parks. Based on this observation, staff concurs with the Commission's recommendation for a park within P.S.A. 36E. Also, in maintaining consistency with the hybrid classification concept, it appears the park parcel size would need to be 4 - 7 developmentally efficient acres. • ANALYSIS #1 INFER GROVE HEIGHTS • p. SIS • SITE Study Area #1 is located within Inver Grove Heights. The site lies 1/4 mile south of Cliff Road, west of Albavar Path, east of the Eagan/Inver Grove Heights border and south of several large, single family parcels. The study area is central to Park Service Area 36E and the Inver Grove Heights neighborhood south of Cliff Road and west of County Road 73. (See Figure #3) The study area is comprised of approximately 25 acres which can effectively support a smaller park parcel. Two meadow areas of 10 acres each,with slopes averaging 2 - 7%, lie to the north and west. A seven acre wooded pond area with shoreline slopes of 15 - 30% lies to the southeast. The woods adjacent to the pond are primarily matured red oaks, hophornbeam and aspens. An evergreen and red oak stand lie south of the western dik meadow. The meadow areas are cultivated in cash crops. A majority of the drainage flows to the pond. The pond is not currently tied into the Inver Grove Heights storm sewer system. The pond and woodland resources are of high visual and ecologic quality providing the potential for passive recreation opportunity. The meadows flat to moderate slopes and lack of significant vegetation provide opportunity for active use facilities such as open play area, playground, hardcourt and parking lot. Development costs would be low to moderate due to efficient grading, compatible vehicular access, structural soils and no utilities. The study areas geometric configuration allows - flexible park layout maximizing design potential, as well as development efficiencies. Acquisition would be possible via a purchase of the parcel from a single or possibly two landowners. Staff estimates that the 25 acre study area could be reduced in size to 10 . 14 acres resulting in an estimated acquisition cost range of $120,000 to $182,000. A joint governmental agreement between Inver Grove Heights and Eagan would be necessary to define acquisition, development, maintenance and operational responsibilities and costs. Subsequent to staffs evaluation of study area #1, a meeting was held with staff members from Inver Grove Heights to discuss the joint park concept. Inver Grove Heights and staff indicated an openness to the concept, but needed to evaluate their yet to be adopted Comprehensive Parks System Plan. At a second meeting, Inver Grove staff explained that their philosophy for parkland classification utilizes 40 acre minimum park preserves to serve a"3 • PARK SERVICE AREA 36E • PAGE FOUR rural populations. These preserves are strategically placed throughout their city optimizing population bases and service areas. Unfortunately, the 400 - 500 Inver Grove Heights residents within the study area were to be served via a park north of Cliff Road. :This conclusion therefore stymies the viability of a joint park concept and Study Area #1. ANALYSIS - STUDY SITE #2 EAGAN Study Site #2 is located within Eagan. The site lies within the southwest corner of the proposed Weston Hills Addition adjacent to Pond 12-27 and the Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul and Pacific Railroad. (See Figure #4) This study area is small comprising only 18 acres. The parcel is characterized by a rectangular configuration oriented northeast to southwest approximately 1,300' in length by 600' wide. This geometric configuration is based on a strong topographic characteristic of a pond to the southwest with a plateau depression to the northeast. The plateau area is predominantly flat to moderate with slopes ranging from 4 - 8%. The pond edge is encircled with slopes ranging from 4 to 20% and covered with overstory trees. Mature oak trees ring the northeast side of the pond. The northwest edge of the pond contains a mixed tree mass predominantly aspen, oaks, sugar maple and willow. The plateau area is comprised of herbaceous plant material and may be suspect to poor soils. In order to be conclusive, additional geo-technical evaluation is necessary. A majority of the watershed within the study are drains to Pond LP-27. Approximately 13 acres outside the study area drains through the plateau prior to outletting into Pond JP-27. The pond is not currently tied into Eagan's storm sewer system. The Comprehensive Water Quality Plan designates the pond for wildlife habitat. The pond and adjacent woodland resource are currently of high visual quality and could provide passive recreation opportunities. The plateau with its flat to moderate slopes and lack of significant vegetation provides opportunity for active use facilities. Development costs would be low to moderate based on efficient grading, compatible vehicular access and no need for utilities. The uncertain development item is whether soil amendments would be necessary to provide a structural base for the parking area. The small developmental area of the plateau provides Minimal design flexibility. The railroad, oak trees and pond provide essentially a non-expandable development edge. Any expansion in acreage to accommodate additional active facility development could only occur to the south and east. The areas south and east of the plateau area are characterized by a 10-20' vertical slope with gradients ranging from 10 - 20 %. Facility placement outside of the flatter plateau area onto these slopes increase design flexibility, but also increase grading costs and acquisition area. • PARK SERVICE AREA 36E • • PAGE FIVE Acquisition could be done via parks dedication of 6.3 acres within the Weston Hills Development or possibly through purchase. It appears that the developer prefers a cash dedication of approximately $94,000 in lieu of a land dedication. The cash dedication could then be used for either acquisition and/or development costs. The developer tentatively considered a land dedication subject to the City providing cash credit toward the pond and • adjacent steep slopes. This credit could account for approximately 2.1 acres leaving a balance of 4.2 acres within the plateau area. Staff's preliminary evaluation indicates the remaining 4.2 acres within the plateau area cannot support the typical, active facility . program without significant grading and the removal of oak trees. The small developmental area provides extreme influence on facility layout and flexibility. The land equivalent to the $94,000 park dedication would essentially purchase acreage characterized by a pond, trees and terrain of minimal value to active facility needs. The option of accepting a smaller portion of the pond and a larger developmentally efficient area within the plateau is a more equitable and effective parkland acquisition. This option provides a viable park which can accommodate a balanced facility program. The developer felt this approach.to parkland siting does not accommodate the layout and economics of the Weston Hills development. ANALYSIS STUDY SITE #3, Study Site #3 is located within Eagan. The site lies south of Farm Road,west of the Inver • Grove Heights Eagan border and north of a 40 acre tree farm. (See Figure #5) The study area is approximately 22 acres which can effectively support a smaller park parcel. The area is characterized by a square geometric configuration with the southern 1/2 being a flat meadow and the northern half being a combination of meadow and low wooded area. The southern meadow is currently utilized for cash crops and has slopes ranging from 2 - 10%. The northern area topography has slopes ranging from 2 -6%. The study area is void of significant vegetation, although wetland tree varieties are located within its northeast corner. A majority of the drainage flows to a small wetland located within this wooded area. This four acre wooded wetland area offers minimal visual or habitat qualities in regards to parkland development. The remaining flat meadow areas, which are void of significant vegetation, provide opportunity for active use facilities such as open play area, playground, hardcourt and parking lot. Development costs in this study area would be low to moderate due to efficient grading, compatible vehicular access,structural soils and utilities. The geometric configuration and available acreage allows for flexible park layout maximizing design as well as development efficiencies. Resource based facilities are not provided for within this study area. Enhancement of the small low area or reforestation may be a viable developmental consideration to provide some passive use opportunities. PARK SERVICE AREA 36E • PAGE SIX Acquisition would be possible via purchase from one or two land owners. The smaller size of the parcels does not support a parkland dedication alternative. Staff estimates that the 22 acre study area could be reduced in size to a 4 -_7 acre park. The estimated acquisition cost may range from $48,000 to $91,000. In consideration of the limited parkland opportunities within Park Service Area 36E, the use of condemnation may be a viable acquisition methodology if the seller contests the City's pursuit for an agreeable purchase. SUMMARY The most complimentary park site, capable of serving both Eagan and Inver Grove Heights is within Study Area #1. The Inver Grove Heights Parks Systems Plan reflects a park to the north, thus eliminating this study area alternative. Therefore, a small park within Eagan to serve the potential 1,300 residents seems appropriate. Study Area #2 within the proposed Weston Hills plat indicates that a 6.3 acre dedication could be made, but that there would be a significant loss of vegetation and higher development cost in order to meet typical parkland design and layout standards. Study Area #3 provides property that is developmentally cost efficient and provides design flexibility. The resource based opportunities are not available, but could be provided via the design process. • FOR COMMISSION ACTION The Commission may consider the following recommendations: o A park is needed to serve residents within P.S.A. 36E. o To recommend parkland designation within the preferred study area. o To provide staff with the preferred acquisition methodology and approach. • KV/SS/bls • • `D' 1 . - ,•a F-• J 0,1115A7 oral Its _ 1 '� `, ` 1 , _ :• is` it S� � N MAY• ■ ?RE EAE �rN 4 .)1 Rwl o . .. . w,t''. ,,,„.. ' ' ____ .. ,....1 ---.y. 1.A.,E . .LCICL CLITF RO . OAK PONS �'( ._ ••�E /All N1:1 S PARK RD LIT .--7474 / I 0 1 1 • NW o • NEA 41,a A. -•411A8- •/ 1 • • ir SI:7(ill#. ' 4, N A U VC�C� SW ' RDA6 .' r i i . IC/4A ' A.11; "Ka I � � 1201M $TR ET W. 1 i 1 1 1 ■ ; i 1p ' `501 SOO • }�,, 6r r . Drsvi+p Titer rSte hen FIGURE #1 Stephen °In too. Dete PARK SERVICE AREA #36E 1/5/92 t AREA LOCATION MAP L • l - -- .1-. .-.---.--411i�-1 liklirJR■111 .., ,,,i‘. Nr PLANT c Op 4 • � �R t Lp` 1 _ —' �- - 1\_ ..14, .91"a N MaY._ FREE , EAE 'Bp -- �\•% �' %lid %� Eft , CLIFF RD •� ' • t OAK POND S . ..1E HILLS S PAPA ,U)•, ''F 1 /I") LLAN / . I °PIDDL E NW . NE. .-TUDY REA #2 o a Set P STUDY AREA #1 4/41 / -` . ' `I i gl'A--- • • -4866- 0 •• x . r � N i°° f � HALL • i tfi W > TUDY AREA #3 N ' FARM GUN E SE � � SW •/ ROAD = ! EAGAN INVER GROVE HEIGHTS j ImOTM QTR ET w ROSEM UNT • !p ' 1 650• 500I • Øeim 8y r aro 1litM Phefl FIGURE #2 ittllivan r-: Dote PARK SERVICE AREA #36E /5/92 AREA LOCATION MAP . • 111` 1 .• , .7 i s. 0 ' / i , / . . . -...„...... .... ...-.CL./.." i . ./ „....so s•-.. .1 a , , */ / ..; i 1 4.•,,, ) / k •......... .12 .• I _z . / . !. / .--) .—......) . .. r -.../ • ....lit. • - 41100. . i . i ....... •*. . • '...., t. it ito .. • .?. ... . . / epee / ; ! L.. . . .1 • ,,, • ( .,. ; - •*I - 1 ip • ... • ''..'4' , ..... , 1"'am ••'" /. •" ••• . ,, 11111AZ,... • IP' ' •i . : ' • I... 1.1 ...‘ I ,••. 12 . V ;I" / , • . . . . . ‘‘ ‘ :..... ••••a •.1 1, 1611 , ! ; I \ .. ..... . 1 . \ I i ..,/ . . \-- . •l6.4... ..... . •-•:--1\. \ 0,• .•••• \ 1 . . . . '. 7 .r.'. I .' , • ... 1.1 I , 11---N ‘4.:. , . . ogi/e/fif . I o/V10•0 g \ • pl. at" 1 . . I ■ •MI 40 o i ', ., • /.0c fil;11 \ ' N..../ . 1 ! -. (.....\%,.. • • . 1.84.,I i.... .... \ 111., • ge.e,k ern 2 t . • -, ...!• ft • • 4. , • •. , -.. .T• I \ • ID . ow P.14 ‘\ . . F.• dal I . w•, . . . 6. ' • : 1.. ' ' ‘••••• \ 4 ' 11111 • .• V\.......: . f . I • . ••' • 1 • 1 • 4'• . : 1‘ : •• 1 • . , . e• ....., . . 8 • ‘ •.... 0. ••■ f i 1 A• . . . . . . , I • 1 '*' V/ •• VW • I A.. vl, , . , , • • , / .. •aur , . ow.awn am all;Ms MED alINID 7 .... . ; I • ..-----1 •• 111010 eh.....'" \•„„ ' . . 41111■_ 1 :., • • I I 1...• . ' 10. • 011 - (Ikt 1• : . . . , . '''STUDY AREA if' t\• 1...,‘•.. ...a . . ,•I 4a.'.1 •• ‘ •.,,4. 1 ...•..4..*.•'7...4 6...* ■I •■41CM 110. .." ....■"•••.)i k•. •••.%s M.O \,.•.k..1l.i.i' ..1..! •.i i..'..i1..1.P. t ., 1L)\.• ..... .\.. ‘-.14t... • 1/4 ... i . / • : ' .1.----"7/• . 71''' : c.::).*. ( •• • ...,\i .. rs4• • •-• 'e ..../ \ • --7 ...:- • .•:-:-;... .,..;—,.. .,,. ) , , .1... ......./..rl r . .--- ' e f• 1 , . .. . . al I •,•'' : I ••••••,, / . / 1 4. . . .. •••• ... • . . . 1...• ••■•• :. • ' • I"‘ • r'. ; I . .a.. . .. .... . , ... . • .,..(. •livt: t ■••,!.....444 —Nii - .4-1■-■11/77771""r".- ,..4.-....:. • •";, •.• Mil ' ..V - . .' .. ..:S‘U.C M;.•.*,,:11 ---*. ; 1;•i' • " 1■N...... ..-.•1i";i j■LT.'. ... ' •• IO. • ..—...-- . . Min ...i.--- • NORTH 0 200 400 . . ,...., ) . . .. - 111/ ix SlEprhe I ov U r,-- • .1,„ v. . gri/92 a oF --• -- - ri,1 . - Dring TittiGuR #3 E ... JOINT PARK STUDY AREA #1 ',CO ' * Inain WO. COMMUNITY PARK Err -• ; . '�' ! �� � --- • • - , • '• :. • '4'-.7,-1' ;:.,....: ' ., . . ., if, ... . ••• '-- • ',! lit,' ,I,. ■ r ft,vill, i:,, 1:,t,, 0.!:'- ■ jam.. // J , - `.. ``_ - , .0, .,/,; .., 0 . . a 4 • ,.. .:s. :. . : 7 - " .' ' :,'. i/,',./' . ,,. e. . ;,, , . \ , . .. .•,.---- • . .•.. .. ... . , , 4- • ; , /7 iii ,..‘ , ., ..i\. .. .. ,•,,./.•..... , , 00 f ' - If• ,','*'' . . . . ' .7 : ii- -. .‘, , - .4. • .� .: ', r :1i. -Sw',�..•. .. I ..a •w ..r�, '•,-+—. . ,-1117.7,- -.`.• .77,•.*iftill2L-1..-..11.-7.71•41110•10■"...grill•••04s- ' i.: !: ***:.• ' //• 7 , 1.-7. %,' 1^ ,-• 21.75 ,:'.- a w,' ..S..,4 • ■_ f ' t J • •1 J..J 1 1 ' �.. I J / I ,. t, { t J 1 i ' ;- :l . •,-• • ''� ' •.--.J Z O�! TM ? OK•, . 1 • J -- . •• .•,s ..I•• MI • . it. • .•- .\• .v: . • 1 NORTH 0 200 400 . , � to gi 'f-' ,r'''ing TitFIGURE #4 • P Sulliva G Dote• c O PARK STUDY AREA #2 . . n Ito 1/5/92 PARK SERVICE AREA #36E V. t' 1 ♦ 1• •., � 1 1 INk♦ 1 r l • • 1 ' 1 . rt., ,• - __..... . .. /:7 I 1; -'. \� �!. �' (# �� \ �a.I t J 1\ ,� ':2.1.7s -,'.,.- •: r 1• • • , . ` J7• . . '�s��� ;I • 1` {, \ • f ...I.J.. .0.)... ...•■•■■•, 1 • ..•• 1.1 �I ''-� •• .... / ` 1 17 ,,♦e• - _' - .• . _-i' 1 .�, is • •'---'.f I I /4.'...\ t., (•` • STUDY AREA #3 • . . .' •. _I > , ••w1.4 f" •1 • I • • • •• i ! � y..,• \ } - I . ' t i Mat••r::P e�. I L• , (t +4 ■ 1 j�p,7 I,'• e I (' . • '�-�. NORTH 0 400 - •�0 1� to Q. 7t oviNg TOW iitstephen Al, it FIGURE #5 Sullivan C'+'� tO\Date a PARK S'T'UDY AREA #3 �.� to. ]/5/92 I PARK SERVICE AREA #36E ' Subiect to approval MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF i THE ADVISORY PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL RESOURCES COMMISSION EAGAN, MINNESOTA JANUARY 9, 1992 A regular meeting of the Advisory Parks,Recreation and Natural Resources Commission was called to order at 7:00 p.m. on Thursday, January 9, 1992 with the following Commission Members present: Deborah Johnson, Jack Johnson, Dick Carroll,George Kubik, and Ted Billy. Commission Members Shawn Hunter and Lee Markell were not present. Staff present included Ken Vraa,Director of Parks and Recreation; Stephen Sullivan,Landscape Architect/Parks Planner;Dorothy Peterson,Superintendent of Recreation;John VonDeLinde, Parks Superintendent and Cherry! Mesko, Secretary. AGENDA Ted Billy moved, Jack Johnson seconded with all members voting in favor to accept the agenda as presented. MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING OF DECEMBER 5, 1991 • Page 3, Paragraph 1, Item #2 should read, "....continue. The date of October 31-, 1995 will be designated as the last date of the phase out." Page 4, Paragraph 4, Sentence 2 should read, "....making a decision on this issue." Ted Billy moved, Jack Johnson seconded with all members voting in favor to accept the minutes 40 as amended. CONSENT AGENDA/DEVELOPMENT PROPOSALS There were no consent agenda hems and no development proposals for the Commission to review. PARK SERVICE AREA 36E Director Vraa re-introduced this item to the Commission noting that the recommendation made on December 5th by the Commission was that a park was needed in this park service area but instructed staff to evaluate potential park site acquisition areas within this PSA. As review, Mr.Vraa identified the area which is located south of Cliff Road, east of Highway 3, north of the City of Rosemount and west of the City of Inver Grove Heights. He continued that the Comprehensive Land Use Plan designates the entire area for single family residential at 0-3 units per acre with an unpredictable development time frame. The primary criteria used to review each study area included, 1) Standard site analysis items such as topography, drainage, vegetation, etc.; 2) Development efficiencies and constraints; 3) Service area efficiencies and constraints; 4) Acquisition considerations and 5) Economic considerations. In looking at a joint park concept with Inver Grove Heights (Study Site #1) it was noted that Inver Grove Heights has yet to adopt their Comprehensive Parks System Plan but they felt that this site would not fit the criteria they were establishing for this area of Inver Grove Heights. After further study it was determined that Study Sites 2 and 3 were the most feasible option for the Commission to consider. • ADVISORY PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL RESOURCES COMMISSION MINUTES OF JANUARY 9, 1992 MEETING • PAGE 2 Steve noted that Study Site 2 lies within the southwest corner of the proposed Weston Hills Addition and comprises 18 acres. In describing the site, Steve noted that the pond edge is encircled with slopes ranging from 4-20% and covered with overstory trees with mature oak trees ringing the northeast side of the pond. The northwest edge of the pond contains a mixed tree mass of aspen, oaks, sugar maple and willow. Steve continued that the plateau area of the site provided for minimal design flexibility. Acquisition could be done via parks dedication of 6.3 acres within the Weston Hills Development or through purchase. Steve noted that the developer prefers a cash dedication=of approximately $94,000 In lieu of a land dedication. The developer tentatively considered a land dedication subject to the City providing cash credit towards the pond and adjacent steep slopes Study Site 3 lies south of Farm Road, west of the Inver Grove Heights/Eagan border and north of a 40 acre tree farm. Mr. Sullivan explained that the study area (approximately 22 acres) can effectively • support a 4-7 acre park site with low to moderate development costs and good design flexibility. He added that there was no pond nor many trees that could be incorporated as a resource for this park. It was noted that acquisition would be possible via purchase from one or two land owners. It was noted that the estimated acquisition costs could range from $48,000 to $91,000. In consideration of the limited parkland opportunities within PSA 36E,the use of condemnation may be a viable acquisition methodology if the seller contests the City's pursuit for an agreeable purchase. In conclusion it was noted that Study Area 2 indicated that a 6.3 acre dedication could be made, but that there would be a significant loss of vegetation and higher development cost in order to meet typical parkland design and layout standards. Study Area 3 provides property that is developmentally cost efficient and provided design flexibility. The resource based opportunities are not available in Study Area 3, but • could be provided via the design process. George Kubik expressed his concern for a park being located in such close proximity to train tracks as shown in Study Area 2. Dick Carroll commented that with an athletic facility within the park use would be generated from the west side across Hwy 3 and the train tracks. He too expressed a safety concern noting that access would need to be internal from Hwy 3. Mr. Kubik also commented on the type of soils in this study area. Mr. Carroll responded that it was primarily sand and gravel and could pose some development problems. Both Mr. Kubik and Mr. Carroll expressed their preference for Study Area 3 because it provides more potential for development and has adequate space for development. Mr. Carroll added that the mix of commercial and residential southwest of the study area needs to be considered when providing accessibility to a park within PSA 36E. After further discussion, Jack Johnson moved that a park is needed to serve residents within PSA 36E and recommended that Study Area 3 be designated as the park site for PSA 36E. Deborah Johnson seconded the motion with all members voting in favor. COUNTY ROAD 30 - EAST OF DODD ROAD: TRAILS Director Vraa introduced this item to the Commission noting that as Dakota County is preparing preliminary plans for the upgrading of Diffiey Road from Blueberry to Highway 3 they are looking at options regarding the steep side slopes and road grades through this section of road. The City's plans have previously identified a bike trail along this section of roadway, however the County has inquired if, rather than having off-road bike trails the City would consider providing that option only for the segment of road east of Dodd to Highway 3. IP Co3 police department PATRICK J.GEAGAN Chief of Police KENNETH D.ASZMANN _city of ecic�cin operations Captain 3830 PILOT KNOB ROAD THOMAS EGAN PAGAN, MINNESOTA 55122-1897 Mayor PHONE:(612)681-4700 FAX:(612)681-4738 - PATRICIA AWADA PAMELA McCREA TIM PAWLENTY THEODORE WACHTER Council Members THOMAS HEDGES City Admininstrotor EUGENE VAN OVERBEKE City Clerk February 12, 1992 To: DALE RUNKLE, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR From: PAT GEAGAN, CHIEF OF POLICE Re: SAFETY ISSUES RELATIVE TO SUBDIVISION ACCESS As I indicated in a recent telephone discussion with Jim Sturm, the Police Department has not had any significant safety incidents arise from long cul-de-sacs. Our main concern with access is more with the ability to get into those areas during severe weather. In talking to department staff we can only remember this happening on a very infrequent basis. If I can provide further information, please feel free to contact me any time. • Pat Geagan Chief of Police PG: ly THE LONE OAK TREE . . .THE SYMB _•, "ENGTH AND GROWTH IN OUR COMMUNITY Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer fire department KEN SOUTHORN Cher DAVE D11OIA Battalion Chef city of aagan CRAIG JENSEN _ • Battalion Chief 3795 PILOT KNOB ROAD THOMAS EGAN EAGAN.MINNESOTA 55122-1318 Mayor PHONE:(612)681-4770 FAX:(612)681-4777 PATRICIA AWADA PAMELA McCREA TIM PAWLENTY THEODORE WACHTER Council Members . THOMAS HEDGES City Adminlnstrator EUGENE VAN OVERBEKE CIty Clerk DATE: February 13, 1992 TO: Dale Runkle, Community Development Director FROM: Dale Wegleitner, Fire Marshal • SUBJECT: Safety Issues to Subdivision Access After reading over your memorandum that was sent to me and after looking at some of the areas listed in your memorandum, the Fire Department cannot recall where we had difficulty with access or reaching any of the long cul-de-sacs. If you need any additional information, please do not hesitate to contact me. DW/kmk • ( 5 THE LONE OAK TREE . . .THE SYMBOL OF STRENGTH AND GROWTH IN OUR COMMUNITY Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer FEB 27 '92 15:32 414 P02 1EMORANDUM TO: Dale Runkle, Community Development Director FROM: Office of the City Attorney DATE: February 27, 1992 RE: Weston Hills Preliminary Plat Our File No. 206-10062 This Memo addresses the concern you raised with respect to the ability of emergency vehicles to access the Weston Hills site through • a private easement which lies along the south edge of the property. It is our understanding that this private easement is to remain a private easement and that at present the City has no interest in obtaining the easement for a public purpose, but rather seeks an explanation on its ability to utilize the private easement in the event of a fire or police emergency. It is also our understanding, that with respect to at least the landowners who use the private easement and live in the City of Eagan (and presumably the landowners in Inver Grove Heights) that the City of Eagan would be the provider of public protection and emergency response. Assuming the above to be true, there would be little doubt that those landowners who use the private easement would presently expect that the City would use the easement for emergency purposes to provide them any needed service. It is arguable, that since the easement itself traverses a portion 'of Weston Hills, that it was anticipated and wau-ld, continue to be the case that the owner of Weston Hills property would be entitled to the benefit of the use by emergency vehicles of the private easement. The Minnesota Supreme Court has recognized the application of what has become known as the Doctrine of Public Necessity. This Doctrine can be summed up as follows: A person is privileged to enter land in the possession of another if it is,or if the actor reasonably believes it to be, necessary for the purpose of averting an imminent public disaster (Wegner v. Mil • . - - y : 1 _ c - _ a�_ = o_ •- , filed December 13, 1991) . This Doctrine emanates from property owner lawsuits where in most cases a city employee (e.g. police officer) "trespasses" on someone's property in order to apprehend a suspect or where city health officials abate a public health problem by entering onto the owner's property. The courts have traditionally found that the city cannot be found liable for damages where the danger affects the entire community or so many people that the public interest is involved, that interest serves as a complete justification to the city official who acts to avert the peril to all. The number of • (,§(4 FEB 27 '92 15:33 414 P03 • persons who must be endangered in order to create a public necessity has not been determined by the courts. In the Wegner court decision, involving -the damaging of a home by the police in the course of apprehending a barricaded felony suspect, the Supreme Court found that in situations where an innocent third party's property is taken, damaged or destroyed by the police in the course of apprehending a suspect, the municipality must compensate the innocent party for the resulting damage under a theory of a th p Y 5 taking. We do not believe that the use of the driveway easement to access the Weston Hills plat in order to abate an emergency situation, would be categorized as a taking of an innocent third party's land. The innocent party (presumably the holders of the driveway easement) are not in the same position as the landowner whose property was damaged in the peaner case. These easement holders, have an expectation of the City's use of the driveway easement and the issue of a taking is suspect in dealing with the mere use of the driveway easement to abate an emergency situation. After saying that however, it is necessary to be careful as to the extent of the City's intended use of the driveway easement. If the City is making a determination now that it intends to use this driveway easement for certain situations, it may cross the threshold of inversely condemning the private driveway easement. If however, the City Police and Fire Departments were to plan for emergency situations which involve use of the driveway easement for access, we do not believe that such contingency planning would amount to a present taking. MGD/wkt • • ENGINEERS•ARCHITECTS•PLANNERS 3535 VADNAIS CENTER DRIVE,ST PAUL,MINNESOTA 55170 672 490-2000 February 17, 1992 RE: EAGAN, MINNESOTA WESTON HILLS PRELIMINARY PLAT SEH FILE NO. 89040 Mr. Dale Runkle Director of Community Development City of Ragan 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55121 Dear Dale: After discussions by both the Planning Commission and the City Council, there still seems to be a few questions relative to traffic issues and the Weston Hills proposed plat. Some have been addressed previously either as part of our report or verbally at a meeting. The following paragraphs try to list each of the issues and provide a short summary of information to help 40 City Council reach a final decision. Our studies indicate that the proposed development will generate approximately 1300 vehicles per day. This is based on national studies of trip generation from single family unit developments. The studies take into account all of the trips made by an average household as well as deliveries, public service vehicles and visitors in a normal subdivision. The same studies indicate the volumes of traffic which might be anticipated in both the normal morning and evening rush hours. We have no reason to believe that there is anything that would make this subdivision deviate from the ^veragc. With the completion of construction for the entire development, all 1300 vehicles access at the northeastern corner of the development which means the maximum exposure of any house will be approximately 1300 vehicles. There will be a diminishing number of vehicles in front of the remaining houses the further they get away from the northeast corner. The 1300 figure is not abnormal for a residential street. Upon full development of the entire 131 units in the development, there will be an approximate 90 additional morning rush hour trips out of the development. Of these, we anticipate that approximately 45 will turn right and go north on Highway 3. IIIMr. Dale Runkle February 17, 1991 Page 2 Approximately 5 will go east on Cliff Road. This leaves about 40 vehicles which will either turn left onto Highway 3 or proceed west on Cliff Road. At less than ._1 vehicle every minute, we do not anticipate that this will add significantly to the current problems of the intersection. The traffic volume returning home in the evening rush hour will be slightly higher. Only those eastbound on Cliff Road crossing Highway 3 will face direct access problems. A second concern though, ::re .::he left tur ; frv:tt ::outilbouIid Highway 3. Currently traffic is turning without benefit of a left turn lane. However, at approximately 1 additional vehicle every minute, the intersection should be able to handle the traffic satisfactorily. The spacing of the intersection of Highway 3 and the railroad tracks along Cliff Road does create concern. However, the same situation occurs at literally hundreds of intersections along trunk highways in Minnesota. The ultimate solution is to signalize the Highway 3 intersection and coordinate with signals at the railroad crossing. This has been done successfully at numerous intersections. In the interim, the existing volumes of railroad traffic and Cliff Road traffic should not create a problem. We are familiar with intersections with carry higher volumes of crossing traffic which are operating satisfactorily. Accident data information has been obtained from two sources. The City of Eagan's Police Department indicated that there were 39 accidents at the intersection in the past 6 years. Minnesota Department of Transportation and Department of Public Safety records indicate that there were 28 accidents in the past 4 years. We have diagrams showing the accidents from 1988 through September of 1991 . The total accidents for each of those 4 years are 9, 3, 8 and 13. ..Ty p0 , :, vehicle accidents. Mn/DOT has indicated that they are presently planning on programming installation of a traffic signal at the intersection in the fiscal year 1995. We feel that means completion of the signal in the summer of 1995. The installation of the traffic signal will include construction of left turns on Highway 3. Mn/DOT is very careful about allowing signal installation on trunk highways. They do not believe that the signal will "bottle up" traffic on Highway 3, although delays will obviously increase since Highway 3 traffic is currently not stopped: Our previous report did not address emergency vehicle access to the plat. Generally' this is a concern of the public safety elements of a city. Our experience in cities shows that some departments want no subdivisions that cannot be served from two access points or reached by approximately 500 feet of fire hose. cocr • Mr. Dale Runkle February 17, 1991 Page 3 Other fire departments have indicated that they can maneuver around a primary problem to get to a secondary problem. We do not propose to speak for the departments in Eagan. There are two opportunities to provide secondary access or to eliminate some of the concerns. An emergency vehicle access could be temporarily constructed using the existing access from the house on the property, to Highway 3. It would require some type of surfacing and maintenance and some type of barrier system to prevent vshicles from accessing it. It is also possible to provide a divided roadway from Cliff Road to the first intersection. This would provide two separate roadways for access from Cliff Road. Concern has been expressed about additional traffic onto the farm road south of the development. The City's policy is to build all roads within the development which would provide a stub extension of Weston Hills Drive to the south property line of the proposed development. We have seen in the past where a street has been built and then a temporary bituminous curb placed at the intersection and the pavement itself filled in with dirt and grass seed. This effectively prevents traffic from using the 0 road. A major concern seems to be the timing of the traffic signal installation by Mn/DOT. We have discussed the potential for early installation by Mn/DOT and find that it is not possible. They have indicated that the City could, through cooperative agreement, install the signal earlier. These types of cooperative agreements do require that the City provide the designs and administer the contracts for the improvements. If Mn/DOT were to install the signal g under their design and con.^.,tr ction, the City, i`:oUli.; merely pay. O-6 :ii heir cost share to the State. We estimate the cost of a permanent traffic signal at approximately $110,000. The City's share under the Mn/DOT and County policies would be approximately $27, 500. If Mn/DOT does all the design and contract administration, the City would pay approximately $2,200 additional (8%) . If the City were to become the lead agency, the City's share of the signal, $27, 500, would not change. However, the City would pay for the entire cost of the design of the signal (estimated at $6, 000) , inspection of the signal (estimated at $3,000) and the design cost and inspection costs associated with the left turn lanes. We have not done any preliminary designs of the left turn lanes but anticipate a design cost of approximately $20,000 and 0 inspection costs at about $10,000. Thus the City would be o . Mr. Dale Runkle February 17, 1991 Page 4 looking at almost $40,000 in fees to get the signal and left turn lanes constructed in 1993. We also have not estimated any City costs in conjunction with installation or railroad crossing protection. Normally these are primarily the responsibility of the road agency (Dakota Co. ) . The additional volumes generated by the development will be phased in as the development occurs. The City can better judge the Market a.:d the development rate for the homes, but we would anticipate that it would take between 2 and 5 years for build-out of this development. I believe that this provides some additional information by which the City can make a final decision on the proposed plat. If you have any questions or need any additional information, please feel free to call me. Sincerely, Glen Van Wormer, P.E. Manager, Transportation Department GVW/mes c: Tom Colbert • • —cit y �of en an MUNICIPAL CENTER MAINTENANCE FACILITY THOMAS EGAN 3830 PILOT KNOB ROAD 3501 COACHMAN POINT Mayor EAGAN, MINNESOTA 55122-1897 EAGAN,MINNESOTA 55122 PHONE:(612)681-4600 PHONE:(612)681-4300 PATRICIA AWADA FAX:(612)681-4612 FAX:(612)681-4360 PAMELA McCREA TIM PAWLENTY THEODORE WACHTER Council Members THOMAS February 14, 1992 City HEDGES. AdmIninstrotor EUGENE VAN OVERBEKE City Clerk MR TOM LINK CITY OF INVER GROVE HEIGHTS 8150 BARBARA AVE INVER GROVE HEIGHTS MN 55075 RE: SIGNALIZATION AT CLIFF ROAD & HIGHWAY 3 Dear Tom: At the February 4, 1992 City Council meeting, the City Council reviewed the Preliminary Plat of Weston Hills. At the public hearing portion of the discussion, issues were raised regarding the signalization of the above-mentioned intersection. Mr. Warren Krech of Inver Grove Heights was present and expressed concern regarding safety at this intersection. It was his feeling that the City of Inver Grove Heights could help the City of Eagan to move up the priority for signalization at this intersection by requesting assistance from the City of Inver Grove Heights in petitioning the state to move up the schedule of the construction of this signal. Any assistance you can give us in this matter will be appreciated. Thank-you. Sincerely, Dale C. Runkle Community Development Department DCR/js THE LONE OAK TREE . . . THE SYMBOL OF STRE AND GROWTH IN OUR COMMUNITY J Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer • SUBJECT: PRELIMINARY PLAT & REZONING WESTON HILLS ADDITION • APPLICANT: LYMAN LUMBER COMPANY STEVE RYAN. LOCATION: P.I.D. #10-03600-010-02 & P.I.D. #10-03600-021-08 EAST 1/2 OF SECTION 36 EXISTING ZONING: A (AGRICULTURAL) DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: JANUARY 28, 1992 DATE OF REPORT: JANUARY 21, 1992 COMPILED BY: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT APPLICATION SUMMARY: An application has been received by the Community Development Department requesting a Rezoning of 58.49 acres from Agricultural to R-1 (Single Family) and a Preliminary Plat of 131 lots and six outlots. The Comprehensive Guide Plan designates this area as D-I Single Family (0-3 units/acre). The proposed 2.06 density of this plat is in conformance with the guide plan and therefore no amendment is necessary. This proposed plat is located south of County Road 32 (Cliff Road) and east of Trunk Highway 3. BACKGROUND: In 1988, the Meritor Development Corporation submitted applications for Rezoning and a Preliminary Plat of 18.8 acres for a development named Boulder Crest West Addition. At the same time, Meritor submitted plans to the City of Inver Grove Heights for a plat called Boulder Crest East Addition consisting of 49 Single Family lots on 24 gross acres. The overall development would consist of 86 lots. The Inver Grove Heights Planning Commission and City Council denied the Boulder Crest East project due to the • need for a Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment and Rezoning to allow a deviation from the five-acre minimum lot size in that area, as well as the policy issue of extending the Metropolitan Urban Service Area (MUSA) line. In July 1988, the Meritor Corporation withdrew their application due to Inver Grove Height's decision to not allow urban-type development. Originally, the Weston Hills plat was submitted for the December 19, 1991 Planning Commission meeting. After staff review and review with Lyman Lumber, it was determined that further analysis with the City of Inver Grove Heights was needed . Eagan staff asked Inver Grove Heights staff to review the proposed plat. A staff-level meeting was held on December 17, 1991 to ask Inver Grove Heights if the proposed plat should accommodate the potential for development within Inver Grove Heights (i.e., roadway connections, utility services extensions,joint park development,etc.). The Inver Grove Heights staff asked their r1-3 • City Council for direction and at their December 23, 1991 City Council meeting, it was the • consensus of their Council to provide assistance in planning for future urban development, specifically for the provision of utilities and streets. No interest in a joint park was expressed. With Inver Grove Heights' comments, Eagan's staff review comments, and neighbors in both Eagan and Inver Grove Heights, Lyman Lumber has resubmitted new plans addressing all concerns. EXISTING CONDITIONS: The site is located south abutting County Road 32(Cliff Road), west of the Inver Grove Heights city limits, and east of Trunk Highway 3 and the Soo Line railroad tracks. Zoning of the surrounding properties is R-1 Single Family (12,000 sq. ft. • minimum lot size) to the north across Cliff Road; E-1 Residential (2.5 acre minimum lot size); and Agricultural (5.0 acre minimum lot size) in Inver Grove Heights to the east; Agricultural (5.0 acre minimum lot size) to the south; and R-1 (Manor Lake Additions) to the west. Two homesteads currently exist on the site (one gaining access from Cliff Road, the other from T.H. 3), and will not remain with the development. Currently, there exists an access easement extending from T.H.3 east into Inver Grove Heights serving five homes and acting as the southernmost boundary for the project. The site is largely open grassland on a rolling terrain with a large stand of approximately 40 oak trees around the north edge of Pond LP-27. A detailed grading plan was submitted for Lots 39-42, Block 1, showing existing trees, their sizes, proposed and existing grading contours, house pads, and wetland limits to illustrate the developer's intention to ensure the retention of this natural amenity. COMMENTS: Weston Hills Addition proposes 131 lots and 6 outlots on 58.49 acres; the largest lot is 40,590 square feet, the smallest 12,000 square feet, and the median lot size is 26,295 square feet. All lots have been designed to meet or exceed requirements for size and width at setback. It is the intention of the developer to phase the project in two or three phases from north to south. The proposal includes three cul-de-sacs: Weston Hills Court, Weston Hills Place, and Weston Hills Circle. The northernmost cul-de-sac exceeds the 500' maximum length and will require a Variance of 240' serving 18 lots. Access to the project is from a median divided entryway onto Cliff Road. Lot 1, Block 1, shall take access from Weston Hills Court. The developer believes that secondary permanent access to this project should occur in a southerly direction, with potential to connect with Gun Club Road accessing onto T.H. 3. Stub streets have been provided on Stratford Lane to the east and Weston Hills Drive to the south to accommodate future development access. At this time,the Inver Grove Heights neighbors do not wish to relinquish use of their private road and the unimproved portion of the 33' wide roadway easement. The developer has taken the 33' wide easement and created six outlots attached to the backyards of the adjoining lots. The outlots can then be added to the lots in Weston Hills or to the area • south of Weston Hills if Lyman Lumber purchases the property. "?(-)- TRAFFIC: The City's traffic consultants have had an opportunity to review the Preliminary • Plat plans and a future conceptual plan to the south with the County engineer and MnDot representatives. Based on their review, SEH suggests that any secondary access to T.H. 3 come from the conceptual area south of the proposed plat and it is their recommendation the plat be approved without access from Bristol Boulevard onto Highway 3. SEH's comments also indicated two concerns with the platting of Lot 1, Block 1 and Lot 1, Block 2. First, the divided roadway along Cliff Road may have operational problems. They suggest that if a median boulevard is desirable, the developer reduce the size and the southbound roadway and platted area be moved east, giving Lot 1, Block 1 a straight • north/south property line rather than a curved property line. Secondly, they feel that a portion of Lot 1, Block 2, should be eliminated. It is the portion directly across from Weston Hills Court. If removed, it would allow the City a future option for a combined roadway development with Inver Grove Heights and eliminate a triangular shaped area which is unbuildable. Both issues can be accommodated with the Final Plat. SEH's traffic analysis is included with this report. Staff concerns with the Cliff Road and Highway 3 intersection prompted an accident report for the years 1986-1991 from the police department showing the number of accidents as 39,with two being fatal. The two fatalities represent one-third of all fatal accidents in Eagan during this time frame. MnDot has acknowledged that accidents are on the rise and are a concern as volumes in that area are expected to rise. MnDot does not anticipate a signaled intersection there for at least three to five years. • PARKS AND RECREATION: The Advisory Parks, Recreation, and Natural Resources Commission at their regular meeting of January 9, 1992 recommended this project be subject to a cash park land dedication and a cash trailway dedication. • • GRADING/DRAINAGE/EROSION CONTROL A grading, drainage and erosion control plan was submitted for this development. - The site will drain primarily to the northwest into the proposed water quality and storage pond,which will be designated as Pond LP-27.1. According to the preliminary grading plan, approximately 53 acres will drain to Pond LP-27.1. This area includes 5.3 acres of Inver Grove Heights that is currently undeveloped. The 53 acre drainage area will require a pond with a storage volume of 8.3 acre feet and a flow out of 4 cfs. A storm sewer outlet for Pond LP-27.1 is proposed to be provided to drain into the Cliff Road and S.T.H. No. 3 ditch system. Fifteen lots on the southwest corner of the proposed plat will have their backyards drain into City Pond LP-27. Also, three acres along the north edge of the site will drain into the Cliff Road ditch system. There is a proposed cut of 10-12 feet on the north and westerly parts of the site and a 8-10 foot fill on the south end of the site. The developer proposes to save and protect the existing trees around Pond LP-27. The rest of the site will be disturbed by the grading for this development. There is a need for additional catch basins and storm sewer to be added at the south end of Weston Hills Court. Also, at the intersection of Cliff Road with Weston Hills Drive, catch basins shall be added to collect the runoff from Weston Hills Drive. City I site must be in compliance with The p ty re uirements for minimum and maximum slopes.requirements final grading, drainage and erosion control plan shall include protection of adjacent properties, construction of temporary and permanent vegetation to control erosion and construction of silt fence to control erosion. WATER QUALITY: This 64 acre single family residential development is located in the upper reach of drainage basin L. A 1.0 acre wetland is located in the northwest portion of the site along the railroad tracks. This wetland is not identified on the City's Water Quality Management Plan. The wetland is proposed to be improved to provide storm water retention and water quality treatment and the pond will be designated as Pond LP-27.1. The preliminary grading plan shows that approximately 48 acres of this site will be directed to Pond LP-27.1. A 3.5 acre pond is located in the southwest corner of the site. This pond is identified on the City's Water Quality Management Plan as Pond LP-27 and is classified as a wildlife habitat pond. The preliminary grading plan proposes to direct only backyard areas to Pond LP-27. • (0' Drainage basin L contains a high concentration of recreational class lakes immediately adjacent to, and downstream of, the proposed development. These lakes include LP-26, LP- 28 (Manor Lake), LP-31 (Hay Lake), and LP-32 (Schwanz Lake). Maximum protection of these lakes as well as some protection of the habitat around LP-27 will be accomplished by routing most of the runoff to the north away from LP-27. One probable impact of adjusting this drainage divide, however, will be to decrease the volume of runoff that enters LP-27 after development. Based on a rough estimate, runoff to LP-27 is expected to decrease by about 33% on an average annual basis. Normal pond elevations in LP-27 may therefore decrease until runoff from prospective future developments in the undeveloped areas to the south are routed to the pond. On-site ponding to treat runoff from the proposed development is both desirable and feasible. The treatment pond (LP-27.1) will be constructed according to National Urban Runoff Program (NURP) standards and will have a minimum wet volume of 5.2 acre-feet, a minimum surface area at the normal water level of 1.05 acres, and a minimum mean depth of 5.1 feet. The inlets shall be separated from the outlet to the maximum extent practicable. Consistent with design standards, a minimum 10 foot wide bench with a 10:1 slope must be constructed around the edge of the pond just below the normal water level to meet safety requirements. Finally, a skimmer should be constructed on the pond outlet. UTILITIES: With the completion of Manor Lake 4th Addition, sanitary sewer service of sufficient size and depth will be readily available to the southern two-thirds of this site. The 'sanitary sewer in the Manor Lake 4th Addition will be constructed in Todd Avenue up to • the west right-of-way line of S.T.H. 3. The preliminary utility plan proposes to construct an 8" sanitary sewer line across Highway 3 at Todd Avenue to serve the development. The northerly 34 lots are proposed to be served by a sanitary sewer line in Cliff Road that needs to be extended from East Greenleaf Road to the east side of the railroad tracks. The Developer intends to petition the City to have the sanitary sewer extension along Cliff Road constructed as a public improvement project. Watermain of sufficient pressure and capacity is readily available to this site in two locations. A 12" DIP line will tie into a 12" stub at the east end of Todd Avenue and an 8" line will tie into an 8" stub located at the northeast end of Manor Lake Addition with both lines crossing Highway 3 to provide water supply and fire protection to the site. A study was conducted of the trunk water supply and distribution lines in this area of the City and it was determined that a 12" trunk watermain should loop through the site from Todd Avenue and then to the south property line. The watermain layout shall provide hydrants in locations that meet the City requirements for fire protection. • • ATION; Street access to the site is readily available Cliff Road on the north end of the development. The stree to Cliff Road along the east boundary line of the plat which is frcnir t layout plan proposes to con City of Eagan. The street layout plan proposes to provide is also the east boundary of Heights 1300 feet south of Cliff Road that could serve a stub street into Inver Grove Grove Heights. The street layout plan also provides a as an east-west corridor into Inver be extended to Gun Club Road as the area to the stub street plat the south that could south of this plat develops. EASEMENT RI HT- the appropriate p HT- easement ntPE ponds. The development will be required to provide level and storage volumes. LP'27•1 to incorporate the required high water The City will require a 30 foot drainage and utility easements centered on the common lot line of Lots 32 and 33, Block 1; Lots centered and 23 of common 4 for the purpose y and Lots 2 ain and storm Block 4 for r lines wf repair and maintenance of the sanitary 4; and widened to accommodate these larger easements. ry sewer The City recommends that these lots be The Dakota County Plat Commission recommended that more depth from CSAH 32 because of the severe sloes 1-5, rov d 1 for enlarged slope construction when Cliff Road is upgraded. P provide for future slope All regulatory agency, permits shall be acquired within required by the affected agency. the a ro riate timeframe as g cy. A Dakota County Highway Department permit will be required to allow discharge of storm water runoff in the Cliff Road ditch system. FINANCIAL OBLIGATION - Weston Hills Addition upon can the 0 e study of the financial obligations collected in the past and the for the property, the following City's existing fee schedule r onnectio are proposed. The charges are computed using the utility system Improvement Use Rate Quantity Storm Sewer Trunk Amount S.F. $.069/sf 2,284,722 sfoi 1.15.10.6 0rlhis area will be credited for the area of any ndin po g easements granted to the City. There are outstanding assessments totaling $48,287 on these properties. At this date, there is no record of a pending assessment against these properties. I /' .7144-22-1992 14 24 FROM SEH INC. TO 6814612 P02 �� MEMORANDUM 4, RS 4400711G75 II RS 3535 VONAS CINTE4 DAS St FIK4 SSW 6124X4=0 TO:• JIM STURM, CITY PLANNER, CITY OF RAGAN FROM: GLEN VAN WORMER-SOB BYERS, SEH DATE: JANUARY 16, 1992 SUBJECTS EAGAN, MINNESOTA WESTON HILLS PRELIMINARY PLAT TRAFFIC REVIEW SEH FILE NO. 89040 We have had an opportunity to review the preliminary Weston Hills located in the southeast corner of Trunk ighwayo3 and Cliff Road (County Road 32). We recently met with the County traffic engineer regarding the plat and access to it and have also discussed it with representatives of Mn/DOT. Based on our review and conversations, we have several comments for consideration by the City and by the developer. Our review included a consideration of future preliminary plans for extending the Weston Hills development south to roughly Gun Club Road. SURROUNDING ROADWAY SYSTEM T.H. 3, the westerly boundary of the plat, is a major north-south route in Dakota County now and will continue to be so in the future. Currently, there is limited access to the highway due to the parallel railroad tracks on the east side and the orientation of development along the highway. This plat helps to Tetain the limitation of access by orienting all development to internal roads. Cliff Road Currently Carries relatively low volumes, especially east of Highway 3. However, it will continue to grow in stature es a major east-west route in Dakota County providing connections to 135W on the west and potentially to Highway 52 on the east. 940k7 eu'OTT JRrC70ON INC A tA, f CMIPPera WLSCC7M W 4 .744-22-19S2 14:z FROM SE}i INC. TO 6814612 P.03 411 Jim Sturm January 16, 1992 Page #2 As such, the traffic volumes in the future will continue to grow east of Highway 3. The existing intersection of Highway 3 and Cliff Road has had increasing volumes with continuing development of the area. Mn/DOT has indicated that accidents are increasing and are becoming somewhat of a concern. We anticipate that the volumes will justify traffic signals and that they should be in place within the next three to five years. WESTON HILLS PLAT The plat shows access to Cliff Road at the northeast corner or as far away from Highway 3 as possible within the platted area. This is the most desirable location, maximizing the distance between the potential signalized intersection and the railroad crossing and the plat access. This distance is approximately 500 feet from the railroad right-of-way and approximately 600 feet from the Highway 3 intersection. Dakota County has indicated concerns over this distance and would like to see it increased. but recognizes the limitations within the platted area. The concept plat for the completion of Weston Hills indicates access to Gun Club Road and ultimately onto Highway 3 at Gun Club Road. Future traffic in the far southerly portions of the future development area will probably utilise Gun Club Road to gain access to Highway 3. However,' it is likely that all the traffic from the proposed 132 lots in Weston Hills and a significant portion of those in the northerly portion of the area Just south of the proposed development will gain access to Highway 3 via Cliff Road and Weston Hills Drive. • lb IN JF41-22-1992 1426 FROM SE7-i C. TO 6814612 P.04 Jim Sturm ianuary 16, 1992 Page #3 The lots shown in the preliminary plat for Weston Hills will generate approximately 1300 trips on an average day. With single access to the north to Cliff Road, all 1300 trips will be concentrated past the northerly few lots. With the additional future development to the south as shown on the Concept plans, there may 400 to 600 vehicles added all along Weston Hills Drive. This places the volume just south of Cliff Road at just less than 2000 or relatively heavy for a residential street. ACCESS AND INTERNps, CIRCULATION Dakota County is requesting consideration of additional access onto Highway 3 from Bristol Boulevard, just south of Todd Avenue as platted in the Manor Lake addition (West of TH-3). The County indicated that if the Cliff Road and Weston Hills Drive intersection becomes congested because of its relatively close spacing to Highway 3, that this connection from Bristol Boulevard to Highway 3 could serve as an alternate. We do not favor the concept of additional access to Highway 3 between Cliff Road and Gun Club Road. if the need for additional access becomes apparent in the future, we would suggest that it may be better to consider a secondary access from the conceptual development area south of the proposed plat. Better overall spacing Could be achieved if the access were located near the property currently owned by Finch. With some minor modifications of the street system layouts in the development south of the proposed platted area, more traffic may be oriented to Gun Club Road, both reducing the volume on Weston Hills Drive and at the Cliff Road intersection. • JAN-22-1992 14:26 FROM SE3-I INC. TO 6814612 P.05 Jim Sturm January 16, 1992 Page #4 Our recommendation, therefore, is that the plat be approved without access from Bristol Boulevard onto Highway 3. This would help protect the integrity of the higher speed, higher volume Highway 3 in the future. We have also reviewed the internal street layouts within the Weston Hills plat. Weston Hills Drive is a. major north-south street and could carry volumes as indicated earlier of up to 1900 vehicles per day. The alignment at intersections appear satisfactory within the preliminary plat area. We do have some Concerns over the concept development design south of the preliminary plat area, especially the S-curve and the modified cul-de-sac on the Weary property. Again, some modifications are possible to remove that concern when it is finally submitted for plat review. There is a potential extension of Stratford Lane to the east into Inver Grove Heights. Although Inver Grove Heights ham limited interests in expansion to the east, this roadway will provide opportunities for movement of local traffic in the future without forcing it onto County roads and trunk highways. We have some concerns with the details of platting on Weston Hills Drive between Weston Hills Court and Cliff Road. The divided roadway at Cliff Road may have operational problems and we would suggest that if a median boulevard area is desirable that it be smeller in mime and that the southbound roadway and the platted area be moved further east. Lot 1 of block 1 would therefore have a straight north-south easterly border rather than a curved easterly border. • JAN-22-1992 1427 FROM SF}i INC. TO 6814612 P.06 Jim Sturm J nuuary 16, 1992 Pag #5 We would also suggest that Lot 1 of block 2 directly across from be terminated ='om Weston Hills Court eliminating a triangular area which is basically unbuildabl•. This would give the City options in the future for s combined roadway with development from Inver Grove Heights. If the County restricts access from Weston Hills Drive onto Cliff Road in the future, a secondary connection into Inver Grove Heights at Weston Rills Court would also be possible. This should have little if any impact on the platted lots as shown. SUMMARY We feel that the preliminary plat as shown le basically acceptable from a traffic standpoint. Minor modifications to two lots and an understanding of the relationship of the plat to 411 future plats to the south and east should eliminate any operational problems and give the City some future fleaibility. We recommend that the plat be approved without access to Highway 3. The issue should be reevaluated as the area south of Weston Hills develops. GVW/cmb o: Shannon Tyree - City of Eagan Steve Ryan - Lyman Development Co. • TOTAL P.06 REAL ESTATE DEPARTMENT Soo Line Building Box 530 Minneapolis MN 55440 �Q� Tel (612)347-8258 K L DIVE.® •J r►�� 2 2 122 Fax(612)347-8170 Soo Line Railroad Company p y Or).). January 17 , 1992 Shannon Tyree , Project Planner City of Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55122-1897 Dear Ms . Tyree : After a review of the Lyman Development Company' s plans for a portion of Section 36 easterly of Highway 3 and the railroad which were furnished with your letter of January 8tly and telephone discussions with Mr . Ryan of Lyman Development, we have decided that the major crossings at Gun Club Road and Cliff Road, the latter which is adjacent to the proposed development, should be sufficient access to this area. Consequently we are not willing to permit an additional crossing 410 of our right of way at this point . The plans are returned herewith. Sincerely, J 1 (!:-.24...-/ R. Jl Tait Manager Real Estate • 612/337-7681 RJT/by Enclosure • cc : Mr . Steve Ryan Lyman Development Co. 300 Morse Ave . Excelsior , MN 55331 • 410 • i CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL FOR WESTON HILLS ADDITION • 1. These standard conditions of plat approval as adopted by Council action on July 10, 1990 shall be complied with: - Al, Bi, B2, B3, B4, Cl, C2, C3, C5, D1, El, Fl, Gi, H1 2. Boulevard trees shall be allowed seven feet from the back of the curb. 3. Snow fencing shall be installed around the oak trees located near the pond to ensure tree preservation during grading and construction. The snow fence will be inspected prior to the grading permit being issued. 4. Lot 10, Block 2 and Lot 1, Block 5 shall have driveway access from Weston Hills Drive 5. Lot 1, Block 6 and Lot 48, Block 1 shall have driveway access from Stratford Lane. 6. Lot 1, Block 1 shall have driveway access from Weston Hills Court (cul-de-sac). 7. Berming shall be located along Trunk Highway 3. 8. Pond LP-27.1 shall be designed to accommodate a surface area at the NWL of 1.05 acres, a wet storage volume of 5.2 acre feet and a pond storage volume of 8.3 acre feet and a flow out of 4 cfs. 9. The watermain layout for this site shall include a connection to the 12"watermain at Todd Avenue and S.T.H. #3 and a connection to the 8" watermain 350 feet south of Cliff Road at S.T.H. #3. 10. The watermain layout that loops through the south portion of the site shall include a 12" trunk watermain from the Todd Avenue connection to the south property • line at the Weston Hills Drive stub street. • STANDARD CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL A. Financial Obligations 1. This development shall accept its additional financial obligations as defined in the staff's report in accordance with the final plat dimensions and the rates in effect at the time of final plat approval. B. Easements and Rights-of-Way 1. This development shall dedicate 10' drainage and utility easements centered over all common lot lines and adjacent to private property or public right-of-way. 2 . This development shall dedicate, provide, or financially guarantee the acquisition costs of additional drainage, ponding, and utility easements as required by the alignment, depth, and storage capacity of all required public utilities and streets located beyond the boundaries of this plat or outside of dedicated public right-of-way as necessary to service this development or accommodate it. 3 . This development shall dedicate all public right-of-way and temporary slope easements for ultimate development of adjacent roadways as required by the appropriate 410 jurisdictional agency. 4 . This development shall dedicate adequate drainage and ponding easements to incorporate the required high water elevation necessitated by City storm water storage volume requirements. C. Plans and Specifications 1 . All public streets and utilities necessary to provide service to this development shall be designed by a registered professional engineer in accordance with City codes, engineering standards, guidelines and policies. 2 . A detailed grading, drainage, erosion, and sediment control plan must be prepared in accordance with current City standards prior to final plat approval. 3 . This development shall insure that all temporary dead end public streets shall have a cul-de-sac constructed in accordance with City engineering standards. (c? STANDARD CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL PAGE TWO 4 . A detailed landscape plan shall be submitted on the proposed grading plan. The financial guarantee shall be included in the Development Contract and not be released until one year after the date of installation. 5. All internal public and private streets shall be constructed within the required right-of-way in accordance with City Code and engineering standards. D. public Improvements • 1 . If any public improvements are to be installed under a City contract, the appropriate project must be approved at a formal public hearing by Council action prior to final plat approval. E. Permits 1 . This development shall be responsible for the acquisition of all regulatory agency permits in the time frame required by the affected agency.. F. Parks and Trails Dedication 1 . This development shall fulfill its parks dedication requirements as recommended by the Advisory Parks and Recreation Commission and approved by Council action. G. water Oualitv Dedication 1 . This development shall be responsible for providing a cash dedication in addition to/in lieu of ponding requirements in accordance with the criteria identified in the City's Water Quality Management Plan. E. Other 1 . All standard platting and zoning conditions shall be adhered to unless specifically granted a variance by Council action. Advisory Planning Commission City Council Approved: August 25, 1987 September 15, 1987 Revised: July 10, 1990 plataprv. con LTS #2 • g I T' " � *14119 - 1.7—r...' "_,ii- '4:0-. STREET MAP -�►.� r Ro w t a.R oavo (�. .. / MIL atRrc A / , I 1 b 1 ....:.) -- _;,..., At' II Id IL I . • 4. is j h O ::,� 5 _; ,, •.< R-2 Illt-,:-•-'' .„," I ZONING MAP ` ;. : —=- . \ A `t. i:" ri x 4•l KW . <n / $ r. 2KE OKh'Wr,SP r`•- MI K 23 w • 0.• CPO — o,, –^^ • • COMP GUIDE PLAN MAP • -�~ -- • ..,. 0 • Ilk a _ • • . (i..) C ?1 .: - • —J • r:P. F I no o ,,1 ......... 111-1,1 ril -.if 1 1---- CLIFF ROAD s. ____, CLIFF ROAD E"I•; I. , i i , - • - - :7 / i ; . 1.• 111 5 1 • 1•c z •- 0 rift 2 r 4 .c I I I ..r / I / 1 -/ I• t 7 ; —I / / / 4 ' RI I. 11011111A% laiNE MIME , ■ '• 7; IC , i ' el• • . 1 ii A ---T-- 7-7----, I - 1 •• .• i r' i El z .4 : .i i ‘----., 'II.4 1.- fra !Z. E; , , .,.. , ; I ..I * P ._4 L. ' Z .• i iteit 0 ...i. ... "V . 1 1: g t-z-,,, , ; : C..) / / / I 12 ..t, -.•-.. . 1 is -.)7,31 i ■ / ./ 2 '-'.:•-) " V g ..4-. .. auto I cm---Z., ' 7 • / / - 'it alril MS 1 ').".—_-:----I -----... -7-r'., / / , •,:',...1 • , ; i IT: s' 4I « ,i VI ••\ / / , . •:'"X.I i / /1'4; / / •' ; 1 II I MS aa m , 7 rt ,. , / ;,...b..... „ 1 , r " -7 i., -,...., 7 / ,. 1 1. t. - Intl • , •, ..... , , / // • 0 , --., ., , • I. I LI. ; 1. / 4' ...■ • i"ti . . / i ... • /. / „ef. ' , . : , 1 1,„, t __j.__i, (6. i: -! t - r / P I I:' .47S6 &Hill !! / • c 1 ' '. g ' a. a HT! .--.....; i 7, - 46.-- \ a / .. / / . 1 ir. r. wr wit ----J / 11. , ' I I. hfil 4. - i.... 1 e - i 1_4i r ii• s ,rr 1 --..._%„,;--4, / - - L , s I 7 . ia. 1 . it . , 0k4 ..__ ".,..., • .:.:.: . ..,, /....-7-- . / .. lir' • 11"— ow"' :. s. .; f.' :::,t; e:t 1,7 ;1:10.1 E.::: ix 11100,44.. •---- ;..: e• I C.i!' ill ! , a i 11111/ mommommim •-1 - ," El / • .tt IG. i F-'• If :It fr .- 4* `.. -.411114thii !. , 4111,,,,, itt , . : I - L. / //.....,. --- > J. , : \.... . . ..., 1g .. ,- • Li 1 f., . . . rri v \I: ' 4. 1 '144 I s 1 Cr) 5, /" / / At •.1., I 4440 ' mit, , , . ,.. . / , , „/......, „ „- -. .. ; ' iv .... 1 . r / A...A. ..e.- ...r411131,” C:1110,14111 I 14 I co / /t ; I ... ;. / ,... ...—. . / --....I •I t.' ' I . . • • ,..,, .. c . . . I // . • ii if -1\t. 'r'•. A. e . • la i/ ..." a. Its I if 4, , •• C \ / • . 1-• 4 • e —si- -4 ' E,...# iM.,_Is ii.,:;,t;:iiii .! / ..___ . __.._. .iir .. -3L.Tm.—ArAculs- 3.4 ..3,,,,,,,,,.4 . .am:-. •mtirr.• e - • i I ;Mill; • . lig l . ......* . .- '•- •-• t1 pill CAI -' if ;I ill i-i-i PI .106 In g ... 11 11! . z 0 1...bis • i i 3 R a i • ... Ili_ "[ 1- / i'. " ri I ,, , ,_ !:1 ;,....;:_ , ,,,.•,....: 3, .., . . • : :" es P 1 . . 0 :z a 0 • . I l'.a:!!t is. ..c s.:71: - agARAggc I vast; 1 tat I Bilk 1.g.z; . .••..•.. g : i ) • tr r i ta",- ,. • _I • !n . ,•••••••• -1 ..r4 1 A •• . t 1 ' : •? -,---, irttls s 'C\. • 1 A'' O - .r ROAD i; • M ,I,ft' -fit'.tr-_. 6;7---,i6A0 1e 1 �/ (P/ , . Y M T.. Z 1 S;7 1 1 /// I l I p P �} a� p P. 1 ,-ate / // / ftM Lt -I _-j__� �( i !!: - / 07111/811 si i C�Xi i -� ` i / .45 T ied 1 ; / r.� // a I' N - 'i�r'=; ,you- -1i z ∎. / j 7 -S :. 11 ,-l..,._i) ay t.!. :.: " ,, • I I / ' • .1 II y ati c • P • 1 / / /•/ Mi 1 i / A/ / 417,1 i. :&Artii&-. miminiA111. , / Y Vitir: w m ; . / /.// Ali .. ... r II . (.1) I . / • \\ : . 1. Br .: .5„-=■„..... $o :. • - II • Z 4c \ - _ //4' r 1 F e / / //o/ ,Age/M*iktik10, 1 J7i 1 , Yt�, ! •..e . sht ��l� Li D T I f•,NM'• i-I F ••iii I i ;ri E � TO4s g _ _ • •T LI 0 e `c) .. . pc, , i x z i . .4--0 m i ' - - -- za: A, i - - •____.. 4',4,-,,,,,,,....1 L.' - r . • • -'.:-1,--.7'..:;'‘' I.c z e Q', ---- .:o4D' ° . I i • -••. .. -:.7----a; lel- ---'",Ciffl.'• ......""' —...--, -r. mi i 'i % . ,. ..,.\---. ';',./-7-',--0, ••••-• • ''S,`------"‘.-1.4;;.i.. .:••-• -.7.-:7_••- . i 1 ,, „, -- - sr .. s., ,.,,4..44; ..• 7.N.NIIII3M11-1 , --'"..i.,.% 0 I- ' 1—-------. . - l_ftli ; . ....; ..:,:.",--, &.5„.:1,,.i. tt.4....i. ... ip•;4.-- ....- - 7-- / E 0• 1.1 I 2-' - - . -: -. :::;•''/,47iy a ■••• • s -,. •' ,....._ ..:I i:fit/.01.1;::•.• r fig)1.:*' el?11 0,041444,,,..... •Wif,g!,:::.:: . .,, . V:-)Z.) s' ,r , - ••'. !•!;11/. 7 1.fr' 4 .ep id . . 7. - . ..s „.. • . ...dr . ..........•;/;;li .:711r '‘ 1 .1 /0: 'ca. ,,.:,..,...... . .. .. ..... ,. I , /7:. Artftel.-,p, ' ..,,,NAL---.--„-- • .: * x. . :_,-. -- ...,:',/,,,-...,:;.:,:.,../...-iiwiy•••• 4-0,4h",stur . At), --'4 t.._L,,,, . ,,- .--_, -..-:-,,...,..,.....:„,..;,...,:;•.;.--...../...• alt..,•,....i.,.,::tLA.fiffittif 114€1"1:1.4.-) 1:si, -4 m --, - 2: 0 . .,.(:•._:,, .:,; . , . ,• •:;"• -\\ Aztjett- lifil Eli! -1M : I ' ,, , . . , ,. , ,..:„.,„,....• .......,, ..,:., - .\,_---„,-Aii.,,:-if ,,--e - / !, 4 2, 2 __,.. e..' - .•:.;...- ,:-...:F.4/ ,• c.,nr ., -, bar---,,z7 '. / •- ---47,/,..• ;;;;;...,'7- ‘,. .. .AiravPli, ,i0411ir--,12w. rie -- -o, , p:;11-4.1_1_L H.1.1E111 , . ,..,”: .",/,"s' 4 •' : / , :.....-;4.../., 7 i *a ,......_...1 „, r .;._,. ..i...:i 1 , i i zo - -._, ! , ./4. , . 1 ' ... /, , ', 1 li i I it 1 I j C> M i• , . ...'..;"•': ... i'ei'....:,1-i ... , '`i%'ilzlikaliOly, - - , , v 0 tn,„,. I ' 0,.. ■ a „gal :. i IPIIIII z a - : :if ;00 . ,. \ „/ ,,..— / - .4 4 .,O#' 4. , 0 • - •• irA16)•\'# ' ''1' I: /lip -I 1. , " . ' --::,-," . t(E , :., .:1:r• " iglx., •1:. --.--...... ..:, • V.4144-7WIS:' . 6: i',..... 00api I . •,.,, II: ''1:' - .,v. ...,•,-;( .(-',..,'-',', - r-"-'=•,,Ntizw-`'- e--- ....164(jp; •..a__._ .‘.. iiiiii ....--;.i.,:y2,-„,,,,:::f;:ji-/,4-- No; _.--etitse-=1,.„. _ . , ,i 1. , , i / orie ellriso, . , -4=-. . , ;hill; i ,..,-,:,;.,.;. „...,.....it 4141 b •••-• • - AM& ellit.. %....r. ji';'''' :/.'C:f 4CY.7 e. l';:.: • r „ „•,,,y 6,,;,,,,,,/,,,, 71,." 1/4-1-stirriArd. rff- - , t, V,/,,A c.c .2,. #itit: , — - • m E *3 - .--,,,-,,,,:%,,'/.' .',-..--,.?7, :1'. • (411;4c. ,..4141211ALVT- JII:. :..' ' till/. ./ ITIct) > CO 5 •' 4111' .,:....iiiii, /:;:':tisi7. :: .4pS''VN,o.F._t,v; .4"...:.......•‘411p:tels4110,1,,- 0:16,-/Ii.vw-Iti 07;11-4 killanv.ta.17 ii.::..'1, ' 4 ;;;'%:41Fr--,7,7 ::::•-•,--P... -'-•,?,,:.:,-,t'.„.. 'TO. -.r.......-.4....r... . 44V 'ili„.i1p9sIsivAr-1114,i..' I roar t eil ' ,, r- '14.....;////:•,?!...:' .. '. ".. ..),i .' ./ •-- "k7.. ''\, 11,1NceillY1 1...D 2•.`:f/I,,./.',.,,.',1/,',,.f e:,,"1,:.,`C:.A,.4:.,.,,.,•r:;',-„,S,,,,:'11.'i..,,.;.-,;:•-,.'•,";7,.:_...:•,,:T;',,•/.:,:,,y..::.,:i,:,'-.,:z.,,'1Z,:.1..•../2....„•e‘,;,'.•....,„.i.., /l•.,.•.,',.../ ' it // 4,:6e,r...•,...,,*...:-,.,.,,.,,.1,•:,..,.-.”,..,„,:.,-„.;, 1:4,_„.A t,0°t,,._'I-,.,e.%.A..-.-•„0t•.i„1c1.‘.t„*1-.:.::......-.5."-.,-•/.19..q 1-1.5 4,,- ,1_,-,4-1,2.,..t.1W.._,%:124-r..,•..,,....,,,,.--.,.,.'g.-n.v„'i._f"t.4t gr 4,-/-)4,4...it..•_,.- ,•,,/4,„i I/ivtl4.I:rt. .„:lt„.ii*,iof..,.,..•.r;'',,i,r/"„ii..,:.-c:..-..::7 .,;, - ,/,'....” ." ( ;r: 1 p':::::::*".',•;•.. •-, ik. ire., Ntor;------ - 42......-_,_.,;,mm..._ Np;. ! !/4:-;,/,, • 7'2'.•:AY's:...-_. ,-----::::.7.• :-77,:i.-•;-_-.2:------- •:-..':::'.-:-.=• ,-;,,::',.. ..r- ; I :,,:1,:.,..-:.- -' • .::::-.:: ::":., -,tt'Si's,..v.' r ..._. ;., 's 2s,-Ic( . -j le'_ --.4-7..-r-r-f;" ' 71====:;-,.;:-41 I4 ::I•":',.',.•-•""r ,.:1: ...-.2..:....::::::...:.-- ......, . ) .... ..... -....., :, i - F........„..,...,..,,-.4.....,,,,,.. i : Ai I i ,, , ,..„---- .,, I '-.. '..:••k- :•-..., 1::‘ : I C r /--------4"44-: • ' •• •x, -” 'I: : *••N '• .../.--",----------. g , r ...- .-4 is, 1 ; i P ;r • .•"... ; ';'---",,--,:::::--- ly.: : . ....„.„ .• I 1 -•'. : I r. = •s i i ... o • .4 . . : i g :!::• i I t •1 i • - i — — • i • • . q. . . ■Now■ • • • 1-7;ritIr IDiii Ili .r7il lir • A '-. 2 1 l' . 55u; 5:1 5: 1' : 3 .: I. : . .A5.13 iii bil. tfv.! ,,, ri .4 . , , ..:,-, 2 : . • § • k 1 .! ": . . A\ !.'1: --- .-t_ ! ., -.2,1. ., -.1 i . , .L. 0 • %,':k .: Zi i_.: ;0 i. * 4 • ;,,,1 g .,,. 1-4t -,Ty! .;!! li .; i : 1., ,; z fi - 0 ri: ,lit kt t..• _ _ ti s';\ li 7'It \'\ 1 ;11:;' 2 IV 411 .2.;i1: i3.71 !: t3 A 3 1 c::7 a .4 Zi, tit ISEV: ti - - .4' .1 § -4-1 'i'=;; 5 0.`=• 11,2! 2.: C ir. iz ! I', s 1" ; !I :: • § kirkerl .‘, ,i' s: ';'. - :A i VI' :::,ii :"..•—' ii . '14--4'/4■ : ) I ..',; 48 is..,,■,,:r;,\* :I ±iizi ; ..1*:.‘, al -1","--,1■'r il i:1 it i I i ; / • ; i ' ''.\\... naPm-its. -110- t 1.1.1 C.: 4 (1) 3 at <0 C . z 0 0 Occ Z_. cc QZ (.5 0 e•■ 1_, M Z r- U.I /45:7,.t:•2i+.:‘, : 4 0(I) (..) ; a W 2 0 w LII \I' . M / 1 i • \ t./ef:=1;1" uzZ 4.? !g, W g ( :: 0. ' • I a. ).• ' 0 \ .,1,0-■ ), ..... Ci: rl i ..., (..) • LLI As - i S I 17. I 1 I 1. .: ' t • Ill ;•i f •:C ii I , i 1 1 • ; • r r r t 2 • . . .. 1 I % 44 Are . I El • I -ii 1 • -, !ii.i, \Ill • ...... • •,. 8 - I:i I : : I 21 I ' . is. • 641 •\;11 III I III? li . i HI . . i ti 1" if 1,1;1 ..ti t i til .1 i tri owelp -li 1 . 1 ;•;1 3'.'" IA q<11 1 ..." 'PI , , -,. g . • a,!... I 11- W. . h 0 1. 1 ;;,i, . . ., it..., r: i ;',! tit!!':i; , iirliIi'll 0:I ! '' 1 i'l' .... !;4!!: 17,; ..41134::: I-, 0. -• I: 1 . \-.* -Ts 11: i 2 I. —1 •',.....„ u.' .,i :": - _-——-I '.71' "'I c.J' '1 4 ';.t:-.1 "ii ZI• I: . . i UJ 1 - 1.0 s. .w 2 ' .1.1.-"•“"%f...:§1-!..21 j It 1 ,,,. -,.• 12; , s lee I— f• 0 ...4 • A 3:11 C ti il Vi r ... .; M C: • 11.-41.-••■- ‘ III W C.. 4110 • W Z X i • 0 °V • CC Z Cka. kamea0 CLIFF ROAD / / / \ T. 1 ! •1 N • " ! 0 / / t. . ' t Z / / / / .....,..‘ -...f......L. • Ppg I / IL' / '------1- 4.•i PIO i / /4.--- ----I ; IR \\I____ oci r-i / / tf'. \ -.. \ \ 1 •___..i -,-.:.! , \- ., t . / 1 .; .)..• \ : ‘.. \ •.-- •• • / • .... . ..,- . ,.. / ,<(\\ )c. .- , . , / / 4 \ \-- . rc" rim \• / / •-• 7 \• .>-. • .: -----t 11 ci) /4 1- IN• >'`.\ . 5 I if _ , . ''',.. .... AN . . \---- :t---1"--- v ' rn 0 .- .. . / , r 0 ..4ir.,. iny „., ii‘ ... :.,.,,,, ..,/.. ..., z / , Y 4- 4 —••••• ■ . • '...' ' ' f'1.* Z '. 't 7 k —1 / , - ....... . ..... ,_,, . " I 1 A X 1 . . I 34 = A. -. / \ I -i. . i . .,... , . -,÷-- _ ■ / "4 14. -.. ‘. ‘ , --I.,. _-•--\ ----1 I , Ask VJ Mr / , / / . ,,r, . . J...._ ,7----1 = .... • I 4. . _ . . . • 1 ..1. ,.... . .R.4. , 1 4,4' 1 / . ..----• .---h-`; \ \ //---,-....,, ..1 ■•• I ! 1 - '- • ' 4'4,./ , • - ----, , / ,....• ri • ,, • I --i 1 i • nil i ,, r- N, ' , 6 / te \ f \ ' .."--Wase.........L.,_----- ...../ • , _,-- I I [i ___ .• • ---1 _,_„. _t__ \ i 1 i I I Eli \ - _ ev 1 t 1 t , .1111•0■11•111 7 A/ 7/// I i *6.•'.. I \ I y\s. 1........• '—. . . \I 1 f , I • • \ }--. E.--1 I \ . —1-----r —ill—T I // /'' • , 1 , : -- ! _ ,L- / I — 1 I I ! 1 2 i ei i ti GUN CLUB — . •■■•.j. ....L...1.,...i... ...! / I r Z :3 I "0 0 t0.n*G3 i 3..., ( 3Ze" i 9 T ' \ \ •:tom \ ' _ Y \ \ t\ \ ` \ • E �i i \ 1 • \ • ` \ \/ \\••E. • t lT 'J .: . ` ,, \,„.... ,e.. e• . ,, \,04,\\.4, , 3 i \ \ • \ \ y). o \ \ ".\ E : •‘ .\.16S,... %.2. ,i,low \ ‘ ....\, Ap, \<4., \ , \ \ \ ‘S., V4V <0\): \ .\e P/4 \ i ; ill' ..1'• '% \ \ ....(3%, V S\1110,:4. - Si r \ __ \ x. ,, • ..• &s * \ \‘ ‘ \ 21 1• ' Ng& do, • ,. , , , , 4., ..„ ,.... ,... IVY "�' ,,`. \ 1:.r. • \ ��lio F� �' .. rt ■.. I S ,• • e ' �Fr �r< t, ;. ' ,� e ,V, \i , , j ' • � ti y _ ---1----p � 04: ..' / /Ms*• L '`' e i 111111111141111111141 , I I • \ O • 4.1. • ;\ I I / I tz, \ I Oc) I = G 'I •_ j �'oit i 1 / �I / . F ,^�I i / /z . rr I , , / II I /fey /.1 4 ' I I / ll /44'`• / / I ,\Si' / C °a : '� w J I .• i r• T i I I • I •� m p T g y 1 p O = z C1 ' Ic � R T m't fIl H Z c N O 5 r $ O m g to t = p p n 0 i n g :1 b t p i C ! i 1 }} . 4 imp I 1._._::::.,....:,...:.:_: il ____J on i S S —1 1— �Y h—- wOAO /' CIF am it � /"4 ri :Ili : i CI '-7 ::::::::4;:.:.:..:.:.4::: ...;•:•,......... :•............ 40 'ii?I il _ 1 •• ••••• i'lk:::: •:!Set:.:::::: ::••Nr...• o :.. I I ■Cn 1 C --■.... / /i ..::•::......:t:;:..t..:...Z.'5.: .........•lin I 11 1 i 1 C---,..es i I i-.4 / .0 ' ::S!:∎t.'!,'.•: '•.(.•.. 4`- •__Ji __VI ( Z -_ // :••• ' ' :`t : V a 1 I a.---.----1 •- C ".:Aris .. ' // :::::Ii...;:;■;1;S:..ii::::;::;.::::t I "$. : '/',' Z3.--� • .;•' •o:. •.�rr:v..f::. s =' t t t iI • • 4 rl.:Y. t I a• Mom -44 -+ / p ........,•••••••, � •. :•:::::ti a..: �� --�-- �/ ' � • ••.. • :.:: .N..▪ .::.::•.........:::::.::•1• : ' :Y :: 111111 ���•�=� i} � - .•'::•: ti. MIIMIIIIII sr- tt 1-,1 i°! ill '4 .•.• '.•...•::.k...' •••.%14:...� .....? •. :k. 7t',':• i tiiij i:i it - --� {r``, `r ,t: :: .. 4v. ! 7:+ai. IS[ _i '•a:::'• •:4:: '34''' :• "'' i• aict L. if ?iy..11 c ; its / / 46titY:::::::•::** .1�i 1, J / S� • 0 a as_azs/ twitti liii �:/ j :v`.:'' : ''' +•.• 1 s / {: .;...!► ., ;41...:::•*:•r. ...,:•t; - i't r / / .�•• :# ::.}•1'' Sx: ..:: •' ...; ' ..: , M.: ':EZE Z X. ./ ,, o`',0 :::::.. :::;;;;:ii:ii:....::.:,:'........4. ..:::::'::::::::::::*:•:;.:.*%%: :?.:0•:::::::;:.• :•.'::i:i:: ,..:,•',.,.,—..:. :::::Mg .'Z •/ •::i.:. 'fir::•:: =Ilk . . o 1/,v 82 e II ."'' il ' ". -1•■ • 1!••.2,•1,: ;.: :•:\'`''' 7',..,-*- 29.1 i .. ..: -',. ; Iii4:J..24...,1):::N.-,- -.:111-.5.-1Ek. -,800.0 !'7:130- 2 '7.'•; : j1 •. .jp 27,\ . .1 tip 2e'A W.818.0 -II L-1817.0 1 1 1. :-- •. :. - . 1.... . - -,ow it -. . -. .. i 896Q 800.0 I.21. , ..,..E. • mu'-822-e\1 i •-..: ,' , '. • '-i, -. ---1 1902., '818.01 ,.1-.'i T.,:7.lip,;. J., ' •■JP-69 L . II ' :,/7\ \ 1 i • \ 1 I.t• t 31 % • -- 942.0 27" '''- '1 -.I -- '' ' \ 1- --- 952.0 •%,„ i'jp-tg 1 ; EP-27U Jr•,--.p.t.?,71 ,., +6.'7 j 1 T I i Mn.. 7‘ 43_2d ji. 908.0:- 1 i"• ..., , 1 oktnircR s• rt:i_5. -;- 4- tr‘:::1W 4,0 N/til 1 i 1:2.T 79/2.0; ..0 c"or'-‘1" I 1 I i 1 I 832 0 .. ,, -959.5i • •!. : •..1, .ri: '',*:',.01:1 :: , 1 • 1 ____ .1 0 • , , ,.JP-.28 .. . 1.i;•qb.ribll Tin:Fill" -4.,::7T 111 jP.:68 jp-52 . i•?• 1 , ;,:, 'I r" . 956.8 8 24.i 862.0 .'"',NP179615. C"04'01 is/W.:4s-1.1.0P■ s..-1 8260 87712 I l'Il■-•:r.':----1 .. '11 .,,,:. ..,,,i.:{:1.1-32.t n_......_l,',._ ! ;-1:--;! •-•- ....____ ' , • - 71' ...-- .: gr..- 958.8 1 _qil_ -1 --;-.774. „.- r' ; - ... : ..0,„„e" '\... :9.6.49,;,14 -7-1- -,• " ' t • --\\-1- ----- -- 17-. JP-50 • , \ --.,;:,:. ,N-7-7-! -, ' ` f.. .j.1/ A"" 1" H.)._-,...: -..„...,/,.:.. --,,-.10,0.. 964.o :: .,:,,.;, ,.. '0,-;;-,, -1"'"fr ■•,; "LP°'2--11m± 1-----] h' ,.1-- .. ....„j 968.C... -. • '1 • • • ' !:I "1.47-911-±- ! lAy ) . .. ,• .1 .:1;•-• LP-61.1 .-", 11441:3747*. tilir74,61•00 rill"ir,11, .. '1 / 69‘.1!-Zit 900.0 i • .;,L.All Li,. - 171-17-,t•-\')- 1'1:- 5,6 806.0_4. ••,... r"k P-48-'I ''1 ' ' 4-' . 7.0 ,..,..!ILT"5 --i-- -- . 1 . .„ iv ,I I 444%■ . 891.3 Lp-61 "Is. _I 1-----894 0/8844•,\, ;" „j'APK7;NCI L.,i,-tor-1,.-.P 9 ie.o 1 ■sN, - ! -1.1D-69' ^' - . p.,o ,,.:'rl.r _.,. .- b". (.7 7-11-7--r,..'-.„1-.;--. i.,•• \ ":-887.8• ,. -: ' '. L . ,_ ..,.,.., . • - .4. -, & .,, .- - 6.95.0 , tr., LP-46 - H.;), •,_,..., • . ,..„Thii•Lp-E,4,../x4g, • . ....• - 879.8 ''-s -111 ','TA,.190.7P.- -Is'',. $. \pm . i• . . J., ,... 1, ye, 04.0 j_44.,.1,i?'24.■, - p.A1-'; - •::%'• 1 '') .1.--, 15%,1",:gi 4.:,:i<J,f,•-;...,1.$1:l'int" / \90/:7;4! , % • LP-67 [ . 'i.J 879.6 -I. / r--7-:'i :..,-).. L8PN-...tV 1:Zi:It We. 1 JO/9.pT.I.t._ Lptir! i.83p 17.0 0 ,LP-35 „,r, 41374.9o:0e) , ,• ;,", -'1- L 4V' LP-3: 870 5'--- --t,D - ---- -‘ --- '-'\)4^161;, 9114 +, ■ 1.662o :ego° ' '''' '8. „, '1.9-33.1A.-7ys,':,.,dlit, -ppko---• - ,_s -'14s-'..\F;A? 1 L..{- I/3.o 864.5. • • • .... - eg-7.5•: ,......r••••.,...7•Da,- : , le ow 0411" 4'1 atL .ii.,4;=.‹., 'EEL t _son_ L.% • -__ • - ----., LP-45 --‘-1-1- '- - 4107 - \ Ye773:3 1_\\_ , - -74 . ib. --31- I_ -36 t" ; \ L_ ,i'_, 69/5.,sj_., . I '8.5 0:', -' \ ■ iz. ilkulir- i,,&==gr r. , - r- .r • ' ot- WI 8464%"'• / Le- 5._ P' 61 1, . V` . 3,32.J ,y„; LP-21 I's, LP-24 \ te lovr " 902.5 *. 883.2 900- 886.0 l - - LP-27 . 922.0 9z5.4 ...• 1. 71r.; .., .." . 1 -II -1,-- , _,..„ ,., , .. .., • • ( 0 ,:i..."--- LP-19 , / t....._ , 9002 4,:,,r: . .. ).1 / • *-4., .41. a--'- ......._ is)ITe 903.0 L-111-t ourr-T•.,----■ :07 .1 - ' • ' 4 - --4`I''" 1 Isr4) i ear's . )8.6 LP-Z2 _1 IP. 904.0 fir-. i gi..-533 --?-1r.••-'••F. JL4-,•R._P. -.--.1;--7 ,--- \...-_,-._7.\_•_- :27,7 30.0 t a9 1,7.,..---. • /.. i ■ ------ / / ,-,.. .4.- • FIGURE No. 17 • STORM SEWER LAYOUT • MAP • • . • - CITY OF • • . tAGA N • . , • IIM WEBTON WILLS ADDITION LYJUJI DEOZLOPXE2IT Chairman Graves opened the next public hearing of the evening regarding a Rezoning of approximately 64 AG (Agricultural) acres to an R-1 (Single Family) district and a Preliminary Plat consisting of 132 lots located east of Highway 3, south of Cliff Road in the east 1/2 of Section 36. City Planner Sturm stated that this application is in conformance with the Comprehensive Guide Plan. He further stated that at a recent neighborhood meeting several concerns were raised including: utilities, stub to Inver Grove Heights, and traffic problems. Mr. Sturm requested that condition #11 be added to require the applicant to obtain from the City a variance allowing a cul-de-sac in excess of 500 feet. He also requested that condition #12 be added which states that all wells and septic tanks on site shall met City specifications. Mike Care, a representative of Lyman Lumber, summarized the application. Mr. Gars stated that they agree to all the conditions plus request that condition #13 be added that requires them to accommodate the intersection at Weston Hills Drive and Weston Hills Court per the MI report. A A!AlI&••■•■••■ _ - _. sm. JAN 29 '92 15:05 195 P06 411 Page 5/EAGAN ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES JANUARY 28, 1992 Michael Frattalone, 4784 South Robert Trail, stated that his main concern was that the existing pond will dry up because of the new proposed pond. This will effect wildlife and the value of his home. He is very opposed to this application. Debbie Fitch, 4790 South Robert Trail, mentioned that one of her concerns was the Cliff Road - Highway 3 intersection. The traffic is already bad there and more residences in the area will not help the situation. This intersection has 1/3 of all traffic fatalities in the City. Bill Loomis, a resident of Eagan, stated that the density for this particular area is too high. He would like the density to match the Inver Grove Heights side of the road. Gene Fitch, 4790 South Robert Trail, mentioned that he is concerned about the possibility of losing the existing pond. Earl Moroski, a resident of Eagan, stated that he opposes this application. Wayne Mullin, 4786 South Robert Trail, felt that the proposed development does not conform to what Inver Grove Heights is doing. He further felt that the Cliff Road - Highway 3 intersection is bad. Deb Asselamus, an Inver Grove Heights resident, stated that her main concern was having a high density development located next to a low density area (2/5 acre lots) . She felt that high density areas should stop west of Highway 3 and east of Highway 3 should be rural. A representative of SEH (the City's consulting engineers) stated that the proposed development will generate 1,300 trips per day and that this number is not unusual. He predicts that in 3 - 5 years MnDot will construct a stop light at that intersection. Mr. Gare mentioned that the existing pond will not dry up. They can drain the water to the newly-created pond and than run it to the existing pond. The water will be cleaner then also. Commission Member Voracek stated that the intersection needs immediate traffic signals erected now, not 3 - 5 years from now. He disagrees with the SEH report. Mr. Gare stated that the 2.2 density that they are requesting is within the limits and that they can not economically justify lowering the density. JAN 29 '92 15:05 195 P07 Page 6 EAGAN ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION/ 0 MINUTES JANUARY 28, 1992 Commission Member Voracek requested that condition #14 be added to make the proposed 6 outlots part of the parcel to the north or to the south. Commission Member Merkley recommended that City staff review the • possibility of making the area in the southeast portion of the development a park. Commission Member Voracek requested that condition #5 be amended to read, ". . . Block 1 shall have driver access to the north." Commission Member Merkley requested that condition #15 be added to require the developer to dedicate a 30 foot drainage and utility easements centered on the common lot line of Lots 32 and 33, Block 1; Lots 8 and 9, Block 4; and Lots 22 and 23, Block 4 and that these. lots be widened to accommodate these larger easements. He further requested that condition #8 be amended require a skimmer instead of a shut-off value. Commission Member Griggs requested that condition #8 be amended to read, ". . . shall be designed and constructed such that . . . and a flow out of 4 cfs. , with effective erosion control measures throughout construction." Griggs felt that there were many gray areas with this application and that he could not support it. Commission Member Hoeft complemented Lyman Lumber on their proposal, however, he was concerned about a high density area next to a low density area, traffic problems, and a lack of coordination with Inver Grove Heights. He can not support this. Paul Bare stated that he is the landowner of this property and he is selling because of assessments. He tried to keep this piece of land natural as long as possible, however, he is forced to sell. He felt that Lyman Lumber did an excellent job with the proposal. Merkley moved, Voracek seconded, the motion to approve a Rezoning of 64 AG (Agricultural) acres to an R-1 (Single Family) district. Merkley, Voracek, Graves, Miller voted for; Hoeft, Gorman, Griggs voted against. Approved 4-3. Merkley moved, Miller seconded, the motion to approve a Preliminary Plat consisting of 132 lots located east of Highway 3, south of Cliff Road in the east 1/2 of Section 36, subject to the following conditions: • JAN 29 '92 15:06 196 P0@ Page 7/EAGAN ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES • JANUARY 28, 1992 1. These standard conditions of plat approval as adopted by Council action on July 10, 1990 shall be complied with: Al, B1, B2, B3, B4, Cl, C2, C3, C5, D1, El, F1, Cl, H1 2. Boulevard trees shall be allowed seven feet from the back of the curb. 3. Snow fencing shall be installed around the oak trees located near the pond to ensure tree preservation during grading and construction. The snow fence will be inspected prior to the grading permit being issued. 4. Lot 10, Block 2 and Lot 1, Block 5 shall have driveway access from Weston Hills Drive. 5. Lot 1, Block 6 and Lot 48, Block 1 shall have driver access to the north. 6. Lot 1, Block 1 shall have driveway access from Weston Hills Court (cul-de-sac) . 7. Berming shall be located along Trunk Highway 3. 8. Pond LP-27.1 shall be designed and constructed such that to accommodate a surface area at the NWL of 1.05 acres, a wet storage volume of. 5.2 acre feet and a pond storage volume of 8.3 acre feet and a flow out of 4 ofs. , with effective erosion control measures throughout construction. A skimmer shall be used instead of a shut-off valve. 9. The watermain layout for this site shall include a connection to the 12" watermain at Todd Avenue and S.T.H. #3 and a connection to the 8" watermain 350 feet south of Cliff Road at S.T.H. #3. 10. The watermain layout that loops through the south portion of the site shall include a 12" trunk watermain from the Todd Avenue connection to the south property line at the Western Hills Drive stub street. 11. The applicant shall obtain from the City a variance to allow a cul-de-sac in excess of 500 feet. 3 ' 29 '92 15:07 195 P09 III Page 8/EAGAN ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION MINUJTES JANUARY 28, 1992 12. All veils and septic tanks on the site shall be capped to City specifications. 13. Accommodate intersection at Weston Sills Drive and Weston Hills Court per SER report. 14. The proposed 6 outlots shall be made a part of the parcels. to either the north or south. 15. The applicant shall dedicate a 30 foot drainage and utility easements centered on the common lot line of Lots 32 and 33, Block 1; Lots 8 and 9, Block 4; and Lots 22 and 23, Block 4, and to widen these lots to accommodate these larger easements. Markley, Miller, Graves voted for; Hoeft, Gorman, Griggs, Voracek voted against. Denied 4-3. Commission Member Voracek stated that be voted for the Rezoning, but against the Preliminary Plat because he felt that a development would be developed on this site in the future, however, this is not the right development at this time. He shared the same concerns as the neighbors regarding traffic issues. He felt that more information . was needed and specific issues needed to be worked out with MnDot regarding the traffic signal. \dj:D\ • JFt1 06 '92 10:031 INNER GROVE POLICE P.2/2 • CITY =CIL 07 XNVER GWVX NEIGNTS • D1CZ21f1 23, 1991 • PAGE 10 MINIMON11/1/1". Council discussed the proposal fora reliminary plat entitled DIRECTION 18 RLSTON triton gills located adjacent to the /aver grove !eights/Wan BILL PLAT IN SAGAS border, south of 110th Street (Cliff load) and east of T.H. 3. It vas the consensus of the Council to direct staff to provide assistance in planning for future urban development, specifically for the provision of utilities and streets is the western portion of the City contained in the Eagan sever district. • • • January 21 , 1992 To: Eagan City Council , Advisory Planning Commission, and Parks and Recreation Department Subject: Weston Hills Addition/Lyman Development located east of Highway 3 and south of Cliff Road in the east half of Section 36 Dear Members, As Eagan residents living near the proposed Lyman Development we would like to point out our basic concerns. We believe the following points contain important information that you must take into account as you review this development. Please consider the following information before making your recommendation decision. 1. Impact to the existing pond on the southwest corner of the de ve l opment. - The existing pond maintains its water level solely from Spring mlt down and runoff from a large portion of the Behr property. The preliminary plan for the development shows that the developer will direct all surface runoff water to a proposed pond on the north side of th development . As a result, the south pond will dry up. This will cau_.e: * a disruption of present wildlife which includes Canada Geese, nllard ducks , woodducks, egrets, pileated woodpeckers, bobwhites, • p:;-.: cants, deer, raccoons, muskrats, fox, opossums, ermine and many others: * the death of the oak trees adjacent to the pond because their shailoa root systems will not be able to withstand the stress brought on by the lack of water. This is evidenced by dead oak trees on the east side of the pond which died as the water level receded; * the devaluation of our property values because of the damage to the wetland/pond areas, the wildlife and the scenery which is critical to the quality of life in our rural area and affects our property v,lues. 2. Substantial increase of traffic for the Cliff Road/Highway 3 intersection and a hazardous outlet on to Cliff Road. - The current volume of traffic at the Cliff Road/Highway 3 intersection already creates a dangerous situation, especially at rush hour. The development on the west side of Highway 3 has already complicated the traffic at this intersection, but the proposed development will contribute much more traffic congestion , as the vast majority of the residents will exit the development and head west, directly into the already congested intersection. - The installation of traffic lights may help the problem but the lights would also disrupt the flow of traffic on Highway 3, complicate the railroad crossing, and create a stacking problem as residents exit the development. - The railroad crossing creates a hazard for this intersection with the current levels o.f traffic. The hazard will be significantly • greater with the increase of traffic from the proposed development . Especially since the outlet onto Cliff Road is the primary and perhaps o3 • only outlet that will be used. This may also have adverse effects on emergency vehicles. - The Cliff Road outlet itself will be peculiar and perhaps unsafe because of the very great difference in elevation between Cliff Road and the land the proposed development would occupy. 3. Proposed road designs for future connections and development including traffic flow into and out of the proposed development. - the Weston Hills Drive stub street connection for "future" connection to Gun Club Road jeopardizes the southern property owners and threatens them with increased assessments, property taxes, possible property condemnation and destruction of nearly 2500 evergreen trees . - stubs leading into Inver Grove Heights may not be usable because the zoning there does not provide for dense, urban type development. Plans to use these stubs may be unrealistic. 4. Increased traffic on Farm Road will require additional road maintenance. Currently road maintenance is provided by the adjacent property owners. Who will maintain this road when the traffic on it increases as the number of residents in the area increase? The developer has not taken into account the surrounding zoning of Inver Grove Heights. There are no "transitional" lots, only sr::11 lots adjacent to 2.5 acre lots. Inver Grove Heights has been illin� to change their zoning to accom-nodate previous high density d-velopments and is not proposing. to do so at this time. 6. Unsupervised children playing near the railroad tracks possess • ,;iential safety hazard usually found in industrial and inner city 7. Increases in assessments and taxes may cause some of us to be uhahl _ to stay on our property. Why should we have to pay this price? W. didn't choose to live in an urban development. S. We don't consent to having our privacy infringed upon by the pe op l,_ why; will walk around our properties, ponds, and wetlands boiieving it to be part of a nature preserve, park, or open recreational area. 9. We are uncomfortable with the increase in crime and vandalism that comes with high density developments. If you would like further information regarding our concerns please call me. I am the spokesperson for our group of concerned residents. - Sincere 1/771:tht ,A4SC47-14- Michael J. rattalone 6S7-1535 days • 452-7740 nights • S To: The City of Eagan Planning Commission From: Residents of Inver Grove Heights living near the proposed Weston Hills development January 21 , 1992 We are opposed to any development in southwestern Inver Grove Heights that would result in a density greater than the currently zoned and planned 2 1/2 acres per lot. If the developers of Weston Hills are - cou id ring a continuation of their development into Inver Grove Heights in order to improve the economic feasibility of their development, they will need to reconsider their plan. Inver Grove Heights has ii ,tcric.11� and is currently opposed to any such development in this • part of the City. The residents are adamantly opposed to such development and support the Mayor and council in their efforts to maintain orderly development in this section of the City. Those of us whc live in the surrounding areas have no intention of allowing a development allowing densities greater than 2 1/2 acres per lot and/or sewer and water assessments to be placed in this area. The developers may wish to save themselves some time and effort by checking into the success of previous developers in this area that attempted to develop at densities greater than 2 1/2 acres per lot. Sincerely, Inver Grove Heights residents living near the proposed Weston Hills development • cc: Lyman Lumber Company `• • o J - - i February 6, 1992 Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55122 Ladies and Gentlemen: The corner of Cliff Road and T.H. 3 and the railroad tracks is already a serious safety problem. Even a stop light would not solve the problem. I am writing to express my objection to the "Weston Hills" housing pro- ject since egress from the plat would be so near that corner it would • exacerbate the existing problem. I believe land use planning and zoning between the Cities of Eagan and Inver Grove Heights should not exist in a vacuum as in the past. For example, the UPS Distribution Center site is adjacent to Inver Grove Heights residential areas and the use of residential roads and noise from the facility creates serious problems for Inver Grove Heights residents . Thank ynu for your consideration. Very truly yours, Robert Pollock •• City Councilmember City of Inver Grove Heights • • C)('° Agenda Information Memo March 2, 1992 City Council Meeting - CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT BUDGET B. Consideration of Five-Year (1992-1996) Capital Improvement Budget--The draft capital improvements program budget was presented during numerous meetings in 1991 in which the City Council reviewed issues ranging from establishing a manageable level of capital expenditures to a designation category of revenue appropriate for financing projects identified in the five (5)year CIP. The document was referenced on several occasions with proposals for the 1992 general fund and public enterprise fund budgets during calendar 1992. • At a special City Council meeting held on Tuesday, February 25, 1992, the document received a final review and, at the direction of the City Council, was placed on the March 2 regular City Council agenda for consideration. The primary ry ob J a ct iv objective of the CIP is to integrate special goals,policies and recommendations contained in the City's plan and its capability to pay for and maintain capital improvements. For purpose of this report, the capital improvement could be defined as a major non- recurring expenditure or an expenditure for physical facilities of government. Typical expenditures are the cost of land acquisition or interest in land, construction of buildings or other structures, construction of roads, utilities, parks,vehicles and equipment. The CIP is directly linked to goals from policies, land use and community facilities, sections of the comprehensive plan redevelopment and the maintenance of the community. The CIP is a "guideline"to capital expenditures, realizing that all capital projects must receive individual review and authorization by the City Council prior to any expenditure. The five (5) year CIP can be amended each calendar year by readdressing the priorities and adding a new year to update the five (5) year period of time. Enclosed on pages `�(�O through ii is a copy of the capital improvements P program as presented at the February 25 special City Council meeting. A more detailed version of the proposed CIP is enclosed without page number for each City Councilmember. Also a budget document, similar to the general fund and public enterprise fund annual budget document, will be printed and distributed at a later date. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny with or without modification a five (5) year (1992-1996) capital improvement budget as presented. D mw FART I Public Facilities Attached and referenced as page is a detailed cost analysis of the Part I Public Facilities portion of the CIP. There are four (4) revenue sources including: *Community Investment Fund 'Single Family Bond Fund 'GO Bond Referendum 'Public Enterprise Capital Fund The total interest available in the Community Investment Fund is approximately $5,000,000. That interest is calculated based on amounts available in calendar 1990 and 1991 in addition to interest to be accrued 1992 through 1996. The Single Family Bond Fund is a source of revenue resulting from a City Council action to defease the $20, 000, 000 single family bonds resulting in the availability of $850,000 to be used for a capital project. The GO Bond Referendum revenue source is available to the City for any and all capital projects as determined by the City Council. The last revenue source under Part I Public Facilities is Public Enterprise Funds which traditionally were used as a major revenue source for expansion to the public works maintenance facility additions. The following is a specific review of each category: Community Investment Fund . As stated, there is approximately $5, 000,000 available in the Community Investment Fund. Those revenues (as shown in the five (5) year CIP) are dedicated for capital projects proposed in 1992 and 1993 . The total cost breakdown is as follows: Public safety/ municipal center expansion is 80 percent or $4,000,000. A breakdown is $1,500, 000 for Fire and $2,500,000 for a law enforcement/municipal center expansion. The allocation for Fire includes land acquisition for Fire Station #6 in the amount of $100,000 in 1992 and the actual construction and equipment acquisition for Fire Station #6 in the amount of $1,400,000 in 1993. The amount for law enforcement/municipal center expansion provides for some combination of remodeling the existing building and new construction of an addition. To date, there has not been a decision as to how the municipal center building would be remodeled and the size of an addition. There was discussion that the $2 ,500,000 might be high and could that number be reduced to reallocate a portion of the Community Investment Fund. It is the City Administrator's recommendation that this amount not be reduced. If a future determination is made to add an addition for law enforcement and remodel the existing building, the cost for construction of law enforcement facilities appears to be averaging around $115 per square. foot. If the City were to construct a 25, 000 square foot addition at $100 per square foot, the total cost to9 would be $2, 500, 000, as an example. Until an architect is selected, there is uncertainty 'regarding the best use of the existing building and size of an addition to meet present and future needs for the municipal center and law enforcement needs. In addition, there is $1,000,000 shown as capital project costs in 1992 which include a $500,000 or 10 percent of the Community Investment Fund for the ice arena/outdoor swimming pool project and an additional $500, 000 or 10 percent for municipal center site preparation. The latter, the municipal center site preparation, will be necessary for the municipal center/law enforcement and outdoor swimming pool/ice arena project to provide adequate parking, roadway improvements, storm sewer and other public improvements necessary for finalizing development of the 40 acre site. In summary, use of the Community Investment Fund is heavily weighted toward essential services. Approximately 90 percent of the proceeds are earmarked for law enforcement/municipal center expansion and Fire Station building projects. The remaining 10 percent is for the outdoor swimming pool/ice arena project. Single Family Mortgage Bond Program As the City Council recalls, the City has accessed approximately $2 , 000, 000 from the 1980 Single Family Mortgage Bond Program. In • 1987, the City Council restructured the bonds and committed those proceeds, approximately $1, 100,000, toward senior housing. As a result, the City in a collaborative effort with the Dakota County HRA is constructing a $3, 000, 000 senior housing project with City proceeds in the amount of $1. 1 million from the Single Family Bond Fund. More recently, the City had an opportunity to defease the Single Family Bond Fund and as a result, has an additional $850, 000 unallocated revenue source available for capital projects. It has been the City Council 's discussion to date to use these funds for a project benefitting youth. As a result, the $850,000 is proposed as a partial revenue source for the ice arena/outdoor swimming pool project. General Obligation Bond Referendum The next funding category is General Obligation Bond Referendum, estimated at $4, 000, 000. This amount will be finalized by March 2 when the project cost for the swimming pool/ice arena is established by the City Council. This amount could increase or decrease according to the final estimates presented by the architect. Public Enterprise Fund The City Council, in previous years, has dedicated a portion of its general fund and public enterprise fund operating budgets for additions to the public works maintenance facility. Due to recent budgetary constraints on the general fund, the last addition/ PC\ improvement to the public works maintenance facility allocation was reduced for the general fund with a heavier emphasis on payment from the public enterprise operating budget. Certainly, there is an argument that both the general fund and public enterprise fund should appropriate dollars toward any improvements to the public works maintenance facility and that equipment storage and administrative office needs benefit street and park activities funded by the general fund and water, sewer and storm sewer needs that are currently financed by the public enterprise operating budget. The same argument could be made with expansion or improvements to the municipal center building in that various departments, especially utility billing, provide a direct service • and purpose to the public enterprise activities. To date, there has been no transfer or allocation of revenues from the public enterprise fund for maintenance and expansion of the municipal center building. In summary, any addition and remodeling to the municipal center which includes a benefit to public enterprise fund activities will be funded by the Community Investment Fund and improvements to the public works maintenance facility could be a direct obligation to the Public Enterprise Fund. Please note that at the request and direction of City Councilmember Wachter, Part I Public Facilities includes the expansion of the public works maintenance facility in 1993 financed from the Public Enterprise Fund. In summary, the Public Facilities budget under Part I is quite aggressive for 1992 and 1993 , assuming several public facility AIL capital projects in those two (2) years. The coordination of lip architects and administration of capital projects takes time and with scarce resources to assume four (4) separate building projects in approximately eighteen (18) months, may be unrealistic but certainly not impossible. It might be necessary to further prioritize and consider some expansion in 1994 . Another consideration would be to hire one (1) architect to combine all improvements into one (1) project, with the exception of the ice arena/outdoor swimming pool. This may or may not be workable given the difference in expertise each architectural firm has, especially in the area of public safety for fire station and law enforcement construction. • \ ` :) 1992-1996 PART I Public Facilities Community Single G.O. Public Investment Family Bond Enterprise Protect Title Fund $ond Fund $eferendum Fund 1992 Land Acq./Fire Station #6 $ 100,000 Ice Arena Facility & Outdoor Swimming Pool 500,000 $850,000 $4,000,000 Municipal Center Site Preparation 500.000 Total 1992 $1,100,000 $850,000 $4,000,000 1993 Law Enf./ Municipal Center Expansion $2,500,000 Fire Station #6 & Equipment 1,400,000 Alkic Works Maintenance Facility Expansion S700.000 Total 1993 $3,900,000 $700,000 1994 None 3.995 None 1996 None TOTAL PUBLIC FACILITIES $5,000,000 $850,000 $4,000,000 $700,000 ,Summary Total Law Enforcement $3,000,000 $ 3,000,000 Ice Arena & Outdoor Pool 500,000 $850,000 $4,000,000 5,350,000 Fire 1,500,000 1,500,000 Public Works Maintenance S700.000 S 700.000 $5,000,000 $850,000 $4,000.000 $700.000 $10,550.00r • 1 ' FART II Equipment 411 This section, Part II Equipment, of the five (5) year Capital Improvements Program, includes both new equipment and replacement of equipment for all general fund operations. Due to levy restrictions, the reliance on general fund revenues is minimal. The main source of funding is the sale of equipment certificates. Please note that equipment listed 1992 has been revised as approved by the City Council. Again, the five (5) year CIP is a guideline and the equipment is subject to change on an annual basis and in any event, would be approved each year as a part of the general fund operating budget process. 1992 - 1996 PART II EQUIPMENT equipment General Equipment Fund Certificate 1992 Data Processing Finance $ 93,570 49,850 Community Development 14,000 Police 95,200 Fire 245, 000 Public Works/Engineering 39,500 Streets 21,500 Parks and Recreation 105. 000 TOTAL 1992 $663,120 1993 Data Processing 58,700 Community Development $45, 000 30, 000 Police 201, 000 Fire Public Works/Engineering 241, 000 Central Services 10, 000 Parks and Recreation 133. 000 TOTAL 1993 $673,700 •94 Administration 13 , 000 Data Processing 23,700 Community Development 30, 000 15, 000 Police 233, 000 Fire 121,000 Public Works/Engineering 178, 000 Central Services 25, 000 Parks and Recreation 194. 000 • TOTAL 1994 $802,700 1995 Data Processing 19,200 Community Development 30,000 Police 188,500 Fire 550,000 Public Works/Engineering 173,000 Central Services 7,000 Parks and Recreation 71. 000 TOTAL 1995 $1,038,700 1996 Total Vehicle and Related Equipment 700. 000 TOTAL 1996 700, 000 &AL EQUIPMENT $75,000 $3,878,220 PART III Public Enterprise & Parks (Parksite) All capital projects defined as Part III Public Enterprise & Parksite will be funded through the sale of revenue bonds, special assessment bonds, parksite fund and potential developer dedication. The only exception is the five (5) year match for sealcoating of streets of which the City funds 50 percent of that cost from the general fund. Approval of Part III of the five (5) year CIP will allow departments to plan timelines for capital projects according to the project breakdown as defined in Part III. Adoption of Part III is not in any way approval of a project. Adoption of the CIP provides direction that it is the City Council's intent to consider projects as proposed for any of the five (5) calendar years. Each project will require a review and approval by the City Council no different from projects that have been approved without a formal Capital Improvements Program. The CIP provides a planning tool for both the City Council and management team. • • 000VO0 00 0 0 - ‘0 00 !1 O • g OOOODO O0 O O - OD 50 � N 00oh .-a0 O1 CD O O — dl OO �oN N e41 O N O u1 NOD 0 CO O 0 n Ps OD O re VI N OD V0 OD N N IA Oh e+1 Oh N N. .-1 O u1 0h rd •1 M N .-1 k0 0 0 N N N N H r1.4 r/ o 'v 00 0 0 O 0 CO eh e,,1 0 . in u1 u1 OS 0. N O A .••I 0 11,1 a.) 0 0 CD . 4 0 0 ^ C.•114 Ott x00 .• 1 y y " O N N N y 1.. hi N C . 0 0 0 0 0 0 �p eO co .700 0 %0 0 . 0 u0'1 cr. 1_, y a7 1r Cs. s7 ‘0 0 0 u1 0 '.O 0 N r4 O1 O -+ OO U1 u1 ev N 1 ~ 0 y — a, .) � . N.1-4 N e1 O n r•■I •0 N 5 w a7 CO ra a P4 H '� 4 ri a = o OW m E-4 Cn 4j w . s w 00 0 0 0 y C N �o 0 0 0 co O ON C.) Id C rl C0 u1 N 0 0 N 0 O+ 0 ,~] a .a a OD 4 CO CO - 0 = 00 J F. X v y• 0 m eN�1 - u1 S c Z D]•i CIS 0 Ca . • r1 0- t0 OD v d y q rl N e.1 to. V• 1J ea 0 e .•d >• •0 CO OD N r4 I O e+9 CD u1 Ire ero aD ....i N a. a •4, 1E a8 B H �p p 4) 1+ m ,��i a 6 G d iA a, .••1 C iJ t1 p O.- O 0 D0 it I 0 0 C 0. H Q . 0 0) •••1 xi) U O u .•1 ro ad O sat-. dU 4/ u 00w "> 1+ 0$ 4 01 O 00 ON y d o 0 1.) d 0: L O co 14 E1 to O IQ .et to u I.4 V oll la O a1 r♦ 1•1 V m D y U rt u d 1+ .'01 C 43 O en Co .-a �+ eu m ..1 O) aC O 1,+ 1.1 O u O .!t $ 'r1 4+ NI .SL iJ ?,r•l G d G O d 1J ..4 11 G a L 7,ri C CV C en la4 14 E 0% 0.1 C.) U y C�PJ t% _ 4! to y w E 1 �"�1 Ia 4! .4 OQ 1.1 H 3 to Ea ay a.1 .•1 ey .a L .. atoUtntny 0oenoo 00 0 — el 00m00 00 0 0 • •-e 00000 in0 0 — in 00 .000 in0 0 0 • )410f•400 nin 0 9- co nOO• in0 NO • 0 b Os000el0 ...1 r. in n ON nt10 � in NO �+ .•� O .o O .-t .� 0' Q` .� ijp - N n 0. .a . 4 E 0C tin tin N f-0 4 4 4 N en en .a N .a ..i 4 .a VI vt V) '0 0 0• fs 0 O 0 0 4.) . Cl L ..a in V3 • in iT O. .a O. at 0 N W n 0 0 N V> . ✓ V •a N O4 a V> 0 Cl • ca o 0 G d 00 00 O O O O W w In 0 0 in in m • 1.+ .—t 0 in .o 4 4 A O 0 .a en V> D 4.4.> u' co co- •0 a, O .a O O 0 .-a 0-4 0 0 0 O o. c' en O O in 0 ■o n O O in el 0000 n co m .oOO N O O` in CV Cr,in 0 - n o r:u;in ci +n4+ .p en .DN0' .-a n neln4 .a cN 04 Z• V Cl> V>.o 0 CO ••+ .-r •vt V) 1 0 O' O N O O N 0 O. 0 .-e COO �- ON 0 tin — in t0 N 0 ...i • N n 0' n n .-t 0 ✓ y • n n •a - 4) 0 ■0 4 ✓ 0 0 t'l 4 •l in N N . N N V) .•a N N V> V> _ 4 N 0 • O O . :11 O O in aD CO 0• .•t .a .a en V> CA- I N Cl) . IA 44 M ♦J 14 PN ' IN $4 r .3 o .a di ?. ii. 0 t!f o .a O. t♦1 >, 6 O .. cn W 6 a) t.a •.r en e0 .a 18 44 9-4 ••• >, O ty C ab to 4.) '0, a 0. C OD O u •0 . .a E O' 0 0 4r 0 u u x .a G & .0a o a�i .0 ni C C a sa m ,.4 0 d .a .0 M C O. 4.t o 0. O O 1.r O. V CO 0 4.1 . OD th 0 Cr. V 0 i.+ E V U as 4-1 OD y 7 C I. o 1:10 •4 O O. > 1+ O +e 1+ 1.t 0 e0 u to 0 > 1+ V ++ 1+ $.4 4+ 0 E-i N as to 44 .a 0� .t3 4+ 0 a) .a V E cr) to cn 4J E-4 V w3 4+ o co .a o E-t cu • ) 1+ to A co U .94 44 N 1a e0 Q in C7 .a 4.) 4J m .-e v 1+ 5.4 O aC M ..a V 10 01 C 1r 14 0 .!L $ V V V C 1+ • •n L en d iv 4J C Q at .ti 4+ .a 0 Oa er 05 d C .!L � >>.-t C 01 I-t d o .a A u 4J in O .Lf E $4 0 4� O 1a v 44 u N E .23 O. 1+ 0 u 44 00 1+ ... 4J a• E a 3 3 E+ 0 .+I 0.1.1 CA V cn C6 can 3 3 E O. can V cn cci) ci 3 k Le O Orn 00 0000 0 0 0 en b O 0 O N MaC � 0 O O O 0 4 ^ NN X0 0 O N oh- in el 4 - O N 1.4+ ii). 14 0 +, ,"•I N 4 in 04 il G�G 0 0 0 A 0 0 0 0 V1 �1 0 0 N b 0 tN o, .-d 4 Or 0 V> V? N O 0 0 0 0 0 In Gk 0 O • 0 0 h en en• 0 0 4 C O 0 N N a g J eh N N 'O a 14 Ls. N 4 0 to . i .,.4 O 0 0 0 N eh 4. 0 4 Z .0 N `° co 4 e"' 4 o CI .-a Q. y .0 0 p4 000 0 Lin p. 0 CT 0' O� 0 0 ON O . 0 O V en en O z z in 4 H 0 In N N C.1 rn N trr en 41> I V> . e% 4C 414. 0 0 0 • '0 0 0 0 C9 W O, O+ 4 0 4 rn t!1 0> V> Ot • � teW 41r, ai $ a oN E ON � 0 y �y W .-i J 1 .4-1-I I-I u 0. CO o F .O-1 0 W G 4-) U -Vi-.4 C ..a • • 0 U 0 L+ '�C O 0 x 0. 0 0 1+ H �+ O G0 V) 0) 0 P. 14 t0 wd 1.4 1t C dO 1 i 01 O M 0 0 c0 I~ 0 C � 05v .� � Hy $4 0 � H iii e .-4 lo O ac 3 1104 H A 0 I %C oOil 0 atl u 4) .4 J 0 VI 1 3 E-1 a VJ U t/) Vn V� Z 3 E+ p< \\"'"-k. Agenda Information Memo • March 2, 1992 City Council Meeting • OUTDOOR SWIMMING POOL/ARENA PROJECT C. Consideration of Outdoor Swimming Pool/Arena Project—The Design Review Committee, appointed by the City Council, has been meeting each Monday since January with representatives of the architectural firm of Ankenny Kell Richter & Associates for the • purpose of refining concept design for the outdoor swimming pool and arena project. In addition to the design of both facilities, the architects have completed a site analysis that allows for expansion of the complex in future years if a second sheet of ice is to be added and additional facilities or outdoor uses adjacent to the swimming pool complex. In addition, parking, traffic flows, overall development of the site as it relates to City Hall and the law enforcement complex, were also reviewed and studied. Another part of the Design Committee's review is the overall project cost which includes actual construction and related fees such as architectural and engineering. The Director of Parks & Recreation has also studied numerous assumptions and research from other communities on operating costs for both the swimming pool and arena facility. At a special City Council meeting held on Tuesday,February 25,detailed presentations were made by the architects and Director of Parks & Recreation regarding design and site analysis, project cost and fees and the operational cost projections. There was also discussion regarding a suitable date for a referendum to ask the community whether general obligation bonds should be issued to finance debt for a portion of the project construction • cost. There were also examples of ballot questions presented and a brief discussion about informational pieces that will be developed and sent out to the community. The following items are to be presented, further discussed and considered for City Council action: 1) Project Design--The architects will present the project design, which includes a proposal for site development. City Council direction is required for concept design as recommended by the Design Review Committee and architects. 2) Preliminary Project Cost & Fees--The Director of Parks & Recreation and representatives of AKR will also present a preliminary cost and fees for Council discussion. Direction is necessary regarding a project budget which includes both the cost of facilities and necessary fees. 3) Operational Cost--The Director of Parks & Recreation will review the operational cost to provide assurances that the operating cost, as projected, should not require any appropriation of revenues from the general fund. There is no specific action required other than a concurrence of the operating cost, based on certain assumptions, as presented. Agenda Information Memo March 2, 1992 City Council Meeting 4) Referendum Date--The dates of April 7, Presidential Primary, and May 19, School Board elections, were given consideration. It was suggested by the City Council at the February 25 special meeting that May 19 be selected for several reasons: a) Additional time will provide for a more informed voter, b) The community is organizing a corporate fundraising campaign during the months of March and April, which meets the May 19 date, and c) Additional time will provide the Design Review Committee, City staff and architects an additional opportunity to further refine project cost. Action is required to set a date for the referendum and May 19, in summary, provides the community additional time to seek corporate contributions, Design Review Committee and staff the ability to further refine the project cost and finally, provide a more cost effective project and better informed public. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To consider the recommendations and findings of the Design Review Committee to proceed with the project design and site development plan as presented by AKR, establish a preliminary project cost for the outdoor swimming pool/arena project, and set a bond referendum date for May 19, 1992 in • conjunction with the School Board elections. SPECIAL NOTE: A final project cost will be determined in early April when the ballot question is presented to the City Council for final ratification. c\ Agenda Information Memo • March 2, 1992 City Council Meeting AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY AND DIGITIZING GIS/JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT A. Agreement, Cost Sharing of Aerial photography anStereo Digitizing, City of Eagan and Dakota County--Enclosed on pages 2! through is a staff memorandum regarding a cost sharing agreement between the City and Dakota County for aerial photography and stereo digitizing associated with the County's geographic information systems property data base. This work is necessary to finish compiling benchmark information for the seven sections of the City not previously digitized. The City and County previously entered into an agreement sharing the costs of this work for the rest of the community. The memorandum covers the proposed agreement between the parties. Staff has reviewed the document and has submitted it to legal counsel for review. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny a cost sharing agreement for aerial photography and stereo digitizing between the City of Eagan and Dakota County as presented. I • DATE: February 27, 1992 TO: Tom Hedges, City Administrator • Kristi Morast, MIS Coordinator aliC) FROM: SUBJECT: Cost Sharing Agreement Tom: Attached is the agreement for cost sharing of aerial photography and stereo digitizing between the City of Eagan and Dakota County, for the remaining seven sections of the city that have not been previously flown. This agreement needs to be approved by our council. The cost for our share of this service is $7,867.50 . This is approximately $2,250.00 per section. The cost was estimated at $3,500.00 per section which was equal to the cost of the aerial photography for the past two years. However, because the remaining areas of the city to be flown are less dense, our cost is less. i 02/25/92 15:58 DAKOTA CakITY-.ESTERN SERV. CPR. 002 1 AGREEMENT =TEENS THE COUNTY OF DAKOTA AND THE CITY POR COST SHARING OF AERIAL pg 411 OF BAH OTOGRAPHY AND STEREO DIGITIZING This Agreement is made and entered into between the Dakota County Survey and Land Information Department, 14955 Galaxie Avenue west, Apple Valley, Minnesota 55124, by and through the Dakota County Hoard of Commissioners, hereinafter "County"; and the City of Ragan, 3830 Pilot Knob /toad, Ragan, Minnesota 55122, hereinafter •City°. WHEREAS, the County desires services for cost sharing of aerial photography and stereo digitizing; and WHEREAS, the County is contracting for aerial photography and stereo digitizing for part of the Eagan area; and WaERHA6, the parties desire to share the costs of said services and the benefits therefrom; and WHEREAS, the respective governing bodies of each party have authorized this Agreement. Now, 'FORE, in consideration of the mutual promises and agreements contained herein the parties agree as follows: 1. GENERAL PROVISIONS. 1.1. Purpose. The general purpose of this Agreement is to establish the terms of cost and benefit sharing in obtaining aerial photography and stereo digitizing for the area located within the Corporate limits of the City of Eagan legally described as: Sections 1-4 and Sections 8-9 and partial Sections 5 and 7, Township 2& North, Range 23 West. 1.2. Recitals. The recitals set forth in the whereas Clauses above are incorporated by reference as if fully set forth herein. 1.3. Cooperation. The parties shall cooperate and use their reasonable efforts to ensure the expeditious implementation of the various provisions of this Agreement. The parties agree to, in good faith, undertake resolution of any disputes in an equitable and timely manner. Page .1 \ P-2-- -2-- 02/25/92 16:05 DAKOTA COUNTY-iESTERN SLR). CTR. 002 1.4. Tern. This Agreement shall be in effect from the date of exeoution by all parties, or from the commencement of services hereunder, whichever is first, and shall continue in effect until terminated in accordance with the provisions herein. 2. DEFINITIONS. Unless the language or context clearly indica€es that a different meaning is intended, the following words, terms and phrases, when capitalized, shall have the following meaning. Data Hese - A geographical data base in digital form which incorporates plannimetric and . contour features of the area stated in paragraph 1.1. • Aorizontal Ground Control - A point on the ground that is identiff d on the photograph and is used to fix the position of the photograph in latitude and longitude (X and Y) . • vertical Ground Control - A point on the ground that is identified on the photograph and is used to fix the elevation of the photograph in altitude (2) . 3. • PURCHASE OF SERVICES. 3. 1. County Agreement. The stereo digitizing and aerial photography to be obtained shall be governed by the term of a separate contract between the County and to which the City is a third party beneficiary. • 3.2. Non-exclusive. Nothing in this Agreement or in the contract between the County and contractor referenced above shall be interpreted to prohibit any partys from purchasing services, products or data directly from the contractor at their own expense. 4 . •COS'1" SHARING. 4.1. Costa. The parties' share of the costs for the services and products produced as a result of the contract referenced in paragraph 3.1 shall be as follows; 50% County* 50% City • I 4.2. Fisoal Agent. The County shall be the fiscal agent for purposes of this Agreement. The contractor providing stereo digitizing pursuant to the terms of the agreement referenced in paragraph 3 shall submit invoices to the County who shall make payment to the contractor. The County shall then submit bills to the City for their share of the cost. The City shall reimburse the County for their share within 35 days by submitting payment in the proper amount to: Page 2 1 2. 3 M2/25/92 15:59 DAKOTA COJ'TY-iAESTERN SERV. CTR. 003 • Dakota County Treasurer Dakota County Administration Center 1590 West Highway 55 Hastings, Minnesota 55033 • 5. ADDITIONAL OBLIGATIONS OF THE PARTIES. • 5.3., Contract Manager. The County shall be the contract manager purposes of the Agreement. All contacts and correspondence with the contractor shall be submitted and received through the County. Information received by the County from the contractor shall be disbursed promptly to each party. . 5.2. Ground Control. In preparation for contractor's services, the County shall be responsible for targeting and horizontal ground control. The City shall be responsible for vertical ground control. • 5.3. Ownership. Ownership of the Data Base shall be jointly held by the parties. Dakota County shall exercise all rights of ownership, title and control to the Data Base under federal copyright law or other law relating to confidential and/or trade secret information. The parties agree that the development Data Base required the skilled efforts of l in the design and compilation and that the end professionals in the original work of the County, its employees and agents.result Parties of the this Agreement May copy and use data so long as such use is consistent with the terms of this Agreement and for internal purposes only. 5.4. Modification/Additions. Any additions or modifications of the Data Base completed by a party shall be made available to the other parties. Additions or modifications to the Data Base shall be compatible to the pre-existing Data Base, including but not limited to, the program, documentation, map project reference numbers and symbol dictionary. To insure standardization and compatibility with the pre-existing Data Base, any additions or modifications into the Data Base shall be approved by the County .Surveyor, before incorporation. 5.5. Distribution of Data. Data or products obtained under the terms of this Agreement may be licensed or sold to persons or entities not party to this Agreement, at prices to be set• by mutual agreement of the parties. Proceeds shall be disbursed pro-rata based on the amount of contribution pursuant to this Agreement. The Data Base, in whole or in part, shall not be released except through a written license agreement as approved by the County. 5.6. Copyright. Distribution of data obtained through this Agreement shall contain a copyright as follows: • r Copyright, • 1992 by Dakota County. All rights reserved. No part of this document may be reproduced, copied or transmitted Page3 0.-4• i 02/25/92 16:06 DAKOTA COLNTY4ESTE 1 SERV. CTR. 003 • in any form or by any means - graphic, electronic, or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or by information storage and retrieval system - Without written permission from Dakota County. Copyright is not claimed in discrete facts, but in . the compilation, arrangement, organisation, presentation and form of . the data, records and information. 5.7. Disclaimer. Distribution of naps created from data obtained through this Agreement shall contain a disclaimer as follows: This drawing is neither a legally recorded nap nor a survey and is not intended to be used as one. This drawing is a compilation of records, information and data from various city, county and state offices and other sources. This document should be . used for reference only. Np representation is made that features presented, accurately reflect true location. Dakota County or any other entity from whom data was obtained assume no liability for any errors or omissions herein. If discrepancies are found, please contact the Dakota County Survey and Land Information Office. 5.8. Base Mae. The County shall create the Data Base and provide one copy in digital form to each party at no additional cost. 5.9. Trade Secrets. No party shall disclose to any other person, organization or entity (excepting other municipal governmental units who are party to a GIS cost share agreement with Dakota County) any data supplied by Dakota Electric Association (DEA). which DEA has designated as proprietary or trade secret, except where required pursuant to the Minnesota Data Practices Act or other state or • federal law regarding the disclose of data. • 6. INDEMNIFICATION. 6.1. Liability. Each party to this Agreement shall be liable for its own acts and the results thereof to the extent authorized by law and shall not be responsible for the acts of the other party, its officers, employees or agents. Liability of the County or other Minnesota political subdivisions shall be governed by the provisions of the Municipal Tort Claims Act, Minn. Stat. Ch. 466 and other applicable laws. . 7. SUCCESSORS. Each party binds itself and its successors, legal representatives, and assigns to the other party to this Agreement and to the partners, successors, legal representatives, and assigns of such other party, in respect to all covenants of this Agreement. Page 4 ---------. ._ --- ... -- --- kG"). 2) 02/27/92 11:14 •DAKOTA COUNTY-IIESTERN SERV. CTR. 002 • ft 8. DEFAULT. • • Force Naieure. No party shall be held • responsible for de l or failure to perform when such delay or failure is due to any of the following unless the act or occurrence could have been foreseen and reasonable action could have been taken to prevent the delay or failure: fire, flood, epidemic, strikes, wars, acts of God, unusually severe weather, acts of public authorities, or delays or defaults caused by public carriers; provided the defaulting notice as soon as possible to the other party of the inability to perform. 9. TERMINATION. • 9.1. With Cause. This Agreement may be terminated with cause upon thirty (30) days written notice. 9.2. Non--Appropriation. Notwithstanding any provision of this Agreement to 'the contrary, this Agreement may be terminated by any municipal party in the event sufficient funds from the County, State, Federal or other sources are not appropriated, obtained and continued at least the level relied on for the performance of this Agreement; and the non-appropriation of funds did not result from any act of bad faith. 9.3. Written Notice of Termination. Notice of Termination shall be mmadethby e certified mail or personal delivery to the Authorized Agent party. Notice is deemed effective upon delivery of the Notice of Termination to the party's Authorized Representative. Notice shall include a certified copy of the resolution of the governing board indicating its intent to terminate the Agreement. 9.4. Effect of Termination. Termination of this Agreement shall not discharge any liability, responsibility or right of any party which arises from the performance of or failure to adequately perform the terms of this Agreement prior to the effective date of termination. Nor shall termination discharge any obligation which by its nature would survive after the date of termination, including by way of illustration only and not limitation, Standard Assurances attached hereto and provisions set forth in Article 5 of this Agreement. . A terminating party shall pay its share of the costs incurred for the project through the date of termination. If payment is not made in accordance with the terms of this A reement return all data and information in their ' a party shall payment has not been made and shall destroy all copies thereof.which 10. CONTRACT RIGHTS/REMEDIES. 10.1. Rights Cumulative. All 'remedies available to it party under the terms of this .Agreement or by law are cumulative and may be exercised concurrently or separately, and the exercise of any one I! Page 5 • i . � �v 0225/92 16:05 DAKOTA CO NTY-iESTERN SERV. CTR. 001 • remedy shall not be deemed an election of such remedy to the exclusion of other remedies. 10.2. Waiver. The waiver of any default by a party, or the failure to give nonce of any default, shall not constitute a waiver of any subsequent default or be deemed to be a failure to give such notice with respect to any subsequent default. 11. REPRESENTATIVE. • • 11.1. Authorized Representative. The following named persons are designated the Authorized Representatives of parties for purposes of this Agreement. These persons have authority to bind the'party they ' represent and to consent to modifications and subcontracts, except that, as to the County, the Authorized Representative shall have only the authority specifically or generally granted by the County Board. Notification required to be provided pursuant to this Agreement shall be provided to the following named persons and addresses unless otherwise stated in this Agreement, or in a modification of this Agreement. To County: Lou Breimhurst Physical Development Director 14955 Galaxie Avenue • Apple Valley, MN 55124 (612) 891-7000 City: City of Eagan Municipal Building 3838 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55122 11.2. Liaison. To assist the parties in the day-to-day performance of this Agreement and to develop service, ensure compliance and provide ongoing consultation, a liaison shall be designated by Contractor and the County. The parties shall keep each other continually informed, in writing, of any change in the designated - liaison. At the time of execution of this Agreement the following persons are the designated liaisons: City Liaison: Krisit Merest Phone number: (612) 454-8100 , County Liaison: Gary Stevenson • Phone number: (612) 891-7088 !? 12. MODIFICATIONS. Any alterations, variations, modifications, or waivers of tie provisions of this Agreement shall only be valid when they have been reduced to writing, signed by authorized representatives. • • ' Page 6 • 1 02/25/92 16:01 DPKOrk t;L1Lk17Y-WES7ERN SERV. CIR. 005 13. 8%BILTTY. The deemed �ceverabla. provisions of this Agreement Shall be invalid, or unenforceable, ea chi rendering hallt not rendered Effect void, • validity and enforceability of the remainder of this Agreement unless the part or parts which are void, invalid or otherwise unenforceable shall substantially impair the value of the entire { Agreement with respect to any party. 14. MERGER. • A4.1. Final Agrree�nent. This .Agreement is the final' the • agreement ' of the parties and the complete and rexclusive statement of the terms agreed upon, and shall supersede all • negotiations, understandings or • agreements. prior representations warranties, or stipulations, either oral or written, not herein contained. 14.2. Exhibits. Exhibit 1 is attached and incorporated herein by reference. • Exhibit 1 Standard Assurances IN WITNESS VNSRtoF, the parties have executed this Agreement on the dates indicated below: Approved as to form: COUNTY OF DAKOTA Assistant County Attorney/Date By • Donald R. Chapdelaine,Chairman Approved as to execution: Board of Commissioners Date of signature Assistant County At orney/Date Attest Auditor • Approved by Dakota County Board Date of Signature Resolution No. CITY OF EAGAN BY • Title • Date o signature By • Title —"'--- Date of signs ure • • C/R-92-128 Page 7 of 7 • i 2\ :g Agenda Information Memo March 2, 1992 City Council Meeting • CUB FOODS/TEMPORARY GREENHOUSE PERMIT B. Special Use Permit, Cub Foods, to Allow a Temporary Greenhouse on Lot 1, Block 1, Cliff Lake Centre, Located in the SE Quarter of Section 29—An application has been received of Cub Foods requesting a special use permit to allow temporary outdoor nursery sales at their location in Cliff Lake Centre. For additional information with respect to this application, please refer to the Community Development Department staff report which is enclosed on pages I Y)through 1 3 for your review. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny a special use permit. for Cub Foods to allow a temporary greenhouse on Lot 1, Block 1, Cliff Lake Centre as presented. • SUBJECT: SPECIAL USE PERMIT • APPLICANT: CUB FOODS LOCATION: LOT 1, BLOCK 1, CLIFF LAKE CENTRE SW 1/4 OF SECTION 29 EXISTING ZONING: PLANNED DEVELOPMENT/COMMUNITY SHOPPING CENTER (PD/CSC) DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: MARCH 2, 1992 DATE OF REPORT: FEBRUARY 26, 1992 COMPILED BY: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT APPLICATION SUMMARY: An application has been submitted by Cub Foods requesting a Special Use Permit to allow temporary outdoor nursery sales at the above-mentioned location. BACKGROUND: Cub Foods has applied for a similar Special Use Permit three times prior to this application. Two special use permits were approved at the City Council meetings in 1989 and 1991, however at the February 20, 1990 City Council meeting, the application was 410 denied. PROPOSAL: Bailey Nurseries Inc. will be constructing the hoop-framed 20' x 80' greenhouse which is secured to the ground with stakes from within rounded steel pipes that comprise the inner structure. The stakes are not visible and the greenhouse is securely anchored to the ground. The material being used is flame retardant unsupported poly. The proposed site is along the north side of the building where the employee parking is located. Cub Foods will be relocating employee parking to the west and northwest portion of their present parking lot. The greenhouse and sales area will comprise approximately 20 parking spaces for a period of eight weeks. Cub would like to commence in the third week of April (the week of April 13, 1992) and cease greenhouse sales eight weeks later (June 7, 1992). Cub Foods holds a current permit from the Department of Agriculture for a nursery license. If approved, this Special Use Permit shall be subject to the following conditions: 1. The permit is temporary and shall expire after June 7, 1992. 2. A building permit shall be obtained through the City of Eagan Protective Inspections Division. 3. The building shall be open ended and shall be placed within a fenced sales area to allow exiting at both ends of the greenhouse. 4. The permit shall be subject to all applicable Code requirements. 3 i ! 9 — \ ___d. I I — ell if•. 1. I `'� . 7 ..,:"...._..7:----....."-.."'/"":..C.•7/-,r -. „op, / ....', -- -- - ..,.. __ -sty I -Z7/1: \ x ;;;;:,, ...„,.. ,i;:".. 11' 'rt., ( ' ,....- --:--;..,;:".?..--: ,,,I111.....' ....Al. 1, . I'.. ,, .r. / ' = , • —...-- ---,:-1 imow, ) , / . . - ). 1 1. -7'. ---// ' .. , , ( • \.;0 V. -.." /- - - _ ") ! / —` _ . - _ _ -�-._ I 1 1 = .• / = —\ -� `� • -. ' / d LI,--_ _% z-=_=/-_---_ _ : = ; r --� - - -t , :\ y , ,. _may / I P -1.-1. ‘ IT INN I CUB I .i N 1 F OO . 1 1 \ t• • \ 1.4 • I ,_I _ • ��, . I ra _______A \ \ \ \ ` C \ - - / \ \.... ......... � �� col tk — d - sue- \��� ,,o - � , \\ ,\� �. ` ��<p ,_,..� , +. 4,111. (II °IL �Y .v ,_‘,.., 'N, 4112L .g DAD_= _ _� / 11 � • � 3 � Agenda Information Memo March 2, 1992 City Council Meeting NORWEST BANK/PYLON SIGN CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AND VARIANCE C. Conditional Use Permit, Norwest Bank, to Allow a Pylon Sign and a Variance to the 300' Spacing Requirement on Lot 4, Block 1, Cedarvale 2nd Addition Located Along the East Side of Sibley Memorial Highway in the NE 1/4 of Section 19—At its regular meeting of February 25, 1992, the Advisory Planning Commission met and considered an application for the above referenced conditional use permit and variance to permit construction of a pylon sign at the Cedarvale area Norwest Bank location. For additional information with respect to this application, please refer to the Community Development Department staff report which is enclosed on pages („ jthrough (3cfor your review. Also enclosed on pages /3(0 through 3/is a copy of the Advisory Planning Commission minutes in this regard. The APC is recommending approval of these applications. Please note the conditions which were added by the commission that do not appear in the staff report. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny 1) a conditional use permit for Norwest Bank to allow a pylon sign and 2) a variance to the 300' spacing requirement on Lot 4, Block 1, Cedarvale 2nd Addition. • I3 2- SUBJECT: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT/VARIANCE APPLICANT: NORWEST BANK LOCATION: 3880 SIBLEY MEMORIAL HIGHWAY (LOT 4, BLOCK 1, CEDARVALE 2ND ADDITION) EXISTING ZONING: COMMUNITY SHOPPING CENTER (CSC) DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: FEBRUARY 25, 1992 DATE OF REPORT: FEBRUARY 12, 1992 COMPILED BY: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT APPLICATION SUMMARY: Separate applications have been submitted requesting a Conditional Use Permit to allow a 27' tall 125 sq. ft. identification pylon sign and a Variance from the Sign Code spacing standard of 300'. This site is located south of Cedarvale Boulevard at Rahn Road. As proposed, the sign meets Sign Code standards for height and size. BACKGROUND: On February 5, 1991, the City Council approved a Variance from the Sign Code allotment of one building mounted sign for each major street frontage by allowing Norwest Bank to replace the First Minnesota bank signs with Norwest Bank and logo signs on all four sides of the building. COMMENTS: The applicant believes that due to a steady decline in the business environment of the Cedarvale Mall area, any effort to increase the visibility of the existing businesses is necessary. Due to the proximity of pylon signs on either side, the proposed bank pylon cannot meet the 300' spacing requirement. The space between the proposed sign and the existing pylon signs for Firstar Bank and Perkins Restaurant is approximately 160' and 70' respectively. If approved, this Conditional Use Permit shall be subject to the following conditions: 1. The Conditional Use Permit and City Council resolution shall be recorded with the Dakota County Recorder within 60 days of approval. 2. The sign shall meet the required 10' setback from property lines. 3. The sign shall be subject to the one-time sign fee of $2.50/sq. ft. 4. All other City Code requirements shall be applicable. � 3 FINANCIAL OBLIGATION - 19-CU-7-1-92, Norwest Bank Aik IIP Based upon the study of the financial obligations collected in the past and the uses proposed for the property, the following charges are proposed. The charges are computed using the City's existing fee schedule and connections proposed to be made to the City's utility system based on the submitted plans. Improvement Use Rate Quantity Amount None 410 3 - I� - j 4.14K E ODLE 1 .`. Oit 0 1 aR /''/,' �j ^ :� f� 1 J `0 3 f S•. 1 • ;,'�\ ( � = a s - -18 - /- ---- \ \ tnl`04 1 w....� - 0/ c • 0.11.11 1.`. .�.rw �' ,: `' .111. 1♦ •��� . •: 'k ci , ♦n_1•.111;_/•.,,.0:11%,4 I1�.='Tai w••• + i ,-jt!i Y .r.._..., r, '.• L i UE*.rfU70 OR ....I •e a . .j• ,0.... •�.O M . 1 :1 t a�-°r- fit_ • •1•. Reel Ca i , e1 � r S eeww.a.1.w 111 2 b 7' }} ` 1777 co RU NO 30`_ `.I.I1 . VICINITY MAP - - - - CEDARVALE BLVD ' ic\I X64 >1 a 0 I 1 , • NORWES? 1 1 •, /-t*- I r Cu.i1 \\ 11 I ��, - ( FIRSTAR " '1 \ 1 of 1 \ 1 C 1\ I. /K t^\ , 1t t 1 ( 1 \ •• \ l �11 / \ I Q \ \ I I ,\ CEDARVALE \ Z J 1 \ ' 1 1- ` '`~ •! LANES 1I ''• ��.... .sue---�. -- J t 1 • 1 _ I1 I ., ' 1 -J /� f f ---4,.....;•-- -�� - -Yr 7 -__r_-, k,-1.-• --�-�.-ritki ' 13 ) MINUTES ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION PAGE 1 OF 2 FEBRUARY 25, 1992 WRIEST BANE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT Chairman Graves opened the first public hearing of the evening regarding a Conditional Use Permit to allow a pylon sign and a 0 Variance to the 300' spacing requirement on Lot 4, Block 1, Cedarvale 2nd Addition located along the east side of Sibley Memorial Highway in the NE 1/4 of Section 19. • City Planner Sturm stated that the applicant is seeking the pylon sign for increased visibility. The application meets City Code height and signage area requirements. Mr. Sturm requested that a condition by added which states that a variance to the 300' spacing requirement by allowed. Margaret Harrington, a representative of the applicant, stated that when travelling east or west you can not see their building because of the trees in the area. She felt that a pylon sign would increase their visibility. Member Hunter stated that he spoke With the manager of Firstar Bank who was very concerned about the proposed sign. The manager felt that this proposed sign would block Firstar's sign. Member Merkley stated that increased visibility would help the business' in this area. Member Hoeft mentioned that the Cedarvale area needs to be rejuvenated and, therefore, he was in support of the proposed sign. The applicant stated that they could move the proposed sign so it will not block Firstar's sign. They are willing to work with their neighbore. Chairman Graves suggested that a condition be added which stated that the proposed pylon sign be moved further east or west to evenly balance the distance between the Perkins sign and Firstar Bank sign. The applicant would work with City Staff to determine the exact location. Merkley moved, Hoeft seconded, the motion to approve a • Conditional Use Permit to allow a pylon sign and a Variance to the 300' spacing requirement on Lot 4, Block 1, Cedarvale 2nd Addition located along the east side of Sibley Memorial Highway in the NE 1/4 of Section 19, subject to the following conditions: 1. The Conditional Use Permit and city Council resolution shall be recorded with the Dakota County Recorder within 60 days of approval. 2. The sign shall meet the required 10' setback from property lines. 3. The sign shall be subject to the one-time sign fee of $2.50/sq. ft. 4. All other City Code requirements shall be applicable. • 3 g PAGE 2 OF 2 5. The pylon sign shall be located in a position which is evenly spaced between the Perkins and Firstar Bank signs. 6. A Variance to the 300' spacing requirement shall be allowed. 411 All present voted in favor, except Bunter who opposed. Approved 5-1. 3 . 1 � Agenda Information Memo Ill March 2, 1992 City Council Meeting MIDWEST BOTTLING COMPANY CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT D. Conditional Use Permit, Midwest Bottling, Inc., to Allow a Building Over 40' Tall in a LI (Light Industrial) District Located Along the East Side of Eagandale Boulevard in the NE 1/4 of Section 3--At its regular meeting of February 25, 1992, the Advisory Planning • Commission met and considered the above referenced conditional use permit for Coca Cola Bottling Midwest. For additional information with respect to this application, please refer to the Community Development Department staff report which is enclosed on pages through l61)for your review. Also enclosed on page Meis a memorandum from the Federal Aviation Administration indicating that the prop sed facility is not an obstruction to federal aviation regulations. Also enclosed on page (/7is a letter of support for the permit from Lexington Standard Corporation. A y of the minutes of the APC meeting with respect to this item is enclosed on page ' j for your re 'e}vi The APC is recommending approval of this application. Finally, enclosed on pageq is a supplemental memorandum from the Community Development Department indic tang that a video tape demonstration is available with respect to this application. • ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or pp o deny a conditional use permit for a Coca Cola Bottling Midwest, Inc., to allow a building over 40' tall in an LI (light industrial) district located along the east side of Eagandale Boulevard as presented. • • 3 SUBJECT: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT APPLICANT: COCA-COLA BOTTLING MIDWEST, INC. • LOCATION: 2750 EAGANDALE BOULEVARD EXISTING ZONING: LI (LIGHT INDUSTRIAL) DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: FEBRUARY 25, 1992 DATE OF REPORT: FEBRUARY 13, 1992 COMPILED BY: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT APPLICATION SUMMARY: An application has been submitted by Coca-Cola Bottling Midwest, Inc. requesting a Conditional Use Permit to allow a building addition in excess of the 40' height limitation. BACKGROUND: Coca-Cola Bottling has been a corporate citizen in Eagan since the mid- 60's. Since then, they have expanded their operations and are now the midwest's largest bottling company, producing 39 million cases in 1991. The Eagan production facility operates 24 hours a day in the summer and employs 650 full-time employees, increasing to • 800 during the summer months. There are 25 automatic guided vehicles at this plant that have been in operation since 1987. EXISTING CONDITIONS: The site is located east of Eagandale Boulevard, south of West Service Road and Highway 55, west of I-35E and north of Eagan Industrial Road. This site, and the surrounding property, are zoned LI (Limited Industrial). The Comprehensive Guide Use Plan designates this area as IND (Industrial), as well as the surrounding area. Because of its proximity to the Minneapolis-St. Paul International Airport, Coca-Cola gave notice to the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) of their proposed construction plans. The FAA, after reviewing the proposed building addition, found that it will not be an obstruction, nor will it be a hazard to air navigation (see attached documentation). PROPOSAL: It is the intent of the applicant to remodel and construct an approximate 50,000 sq. ft. building addition (23,478—new construction). The existing building's total footprint square footing is 516,957. A Conditional Use Permit is required in a Limited Industrial district for building over the 40' maximum height requirement. Coca-Cola is requesting a total height of 95'. The height is required to facilitate the use of an automatic storage and retrieval system and to provide adequate storage of the product. The automatic storage and retrieval system is a process which allows a computer to store the product and retrieve the product in the most efficient and timely way. The building 13 addition will be made up of racks storing pallets of soda. It includes 13 tiers of 24 rows and 66 bays. This system is currently in operation at their Ohio plant. The building • remodel/addition will not include offices. It will be strictly for warehousing. Construction for this type of system is done from the inside out; the racks will be constructed and then a shell will be constructed around it. FINANCIAL OBLIGATION - 3-CU-6-1-92, Coca Cola Bottling Midwest Based upon the study of the financial obligations collected in the past and the uses proposed for the property, the following charges are proposed. The charges are computed using the City's existing fee schedule and connections proposed to be made to the City's utility system based on the submitted plans. Improvement Use Rate Quantity Amount • None • CONDITIONS FOR COCA-COLA BOTTLING MIDWEST, INC. 1. This Conditional Use Permit must be recorded at the Dakota County Recorder's Office within 60 days of Council action. • O ■ Coca Cola Bottling Inc.C.U.P. • G too • .\\ H 91 t ! . . -�\ I E/d STREET MAP :, - , ,�uE -' NW i //NE NW ' '.ENTER :URVE \ % / '4-4 '-� ��vs9R 's ,^,•3 /I y ,.,�:may :L ,XJ k 2 � FK y 'b„ „, i ST � AN ^i• . W I II• s, y./ / - 4 l> ' SN EbG.rD” -!/ T L£%/NCTCN1' t ,.., v rJ ; L; �SE-^ 5t — SW Y "PK ,. j ��) IT cr0 t / I v 7I 0 rIMENDOTA HTS. \ 8 � cn v • _- ... t9...___ \ ,,.,,,.___. ..,_,..,,':i ....1Mr,' ZONING MAP - -- �*lir _-' L_ilJ-1. .y 1 _. fogrIllit". - 4".'4 \v III 1 moo, • G �/ L 1 1 1) �I_ ti�� 7.7-_: t_ t- wE r+.7 ! S i I SOME OM Ir—E T- 1, l ,rT'•.!rilr TTii Ti 1 , _ . _. - - - - ..o.„. COMP GUIDE PLAN MAP +� 4.7 4 lir.4", IND IF _ ; P • i ( m \4`•\ I .• © IND VESOTA tEPAR1tfltll • 01 O111A11011 RIGIIf or WAY PI r■I 1 . \ 4.• 0 19-33 ': ... 0 –.—,__________ ---- ------- ---- — — 'Y' • ' ... , !� fir ''' N " • i ,' ... .-- —1.--;/).. --'1..;::.:::::!!•.::.:!:.!::::...::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: :-:•.:11%.'.::"N::•••■‘2‘,.\''. . . E V . G t n IF A • a�— ' ' ►i •1 E :cfi;ii :: iiiii::.':i•... i ♦" : .•• , ‘ i iS: 14hhl��t' 1ER �+ en c4 ;P%-\,„%, I 1 ' R- / 1.6 l ' � 4 o, ,,,, ii.)t.. \if!, to ...-.. o/c\ •tr. , 4 47 \\? '•1,_ -\,,N / •) , ek- \IN t , 7 . ,, f\' "c!-Illf‘" 1 ' k . ._ �. 'nllK nl 0 : ' 4, I'l • 1 4-3-- . 9ZA o C 0,„ . / °jpz r • • . t t • t • 41t# N 4-40 c e o .\*SNI , \ N . \ ,`: '',,, . \ %.. /<1 lob . t:i iSt o, 4 • �0 / //7.\\.... ed, . /2)>,• i *11/)‘7' \.41 / '4414ir‘ i .: I.=) I *. 'I'.* • �_t I ti 1 . • \ ,1443. �j !r ii � \. �� • 1 .,: ! L qq • �� • :D Ili dill II I 'III ) II i I +\ I,. tAti•_� 1111I� 1 1f 1 I� IIOIHI I if . 1 f .i I RII I I I \,m wsr w.: C� �� n . II: of I ■ Z O -1_ r ------------- V?'Q1 Ck.yt / `\ r t{{ �• r q1• o > e '> ! i I - I :I it ;1 vi, ea ii> — m .13 w; 1 . -f s 6 • 1` Q•:gee Ii I >> ' .......T.-0 1 --7 — i i ` '. i \ O , / \., \ 71/ - - • 1 \ 1 .\\, , 1 I� I ..../ i !I i i , \ „ ,,, . ,,,, • ill ! 0 If ig-1111'"..1.1” :i::::_-:4Fji: . : I � IL y \.__ ,,,...,.. ..-,....H.:::.:.:„...:„.:...„ . d _... llt ._ -IIt ........... ....... .. .......... .. ..... ..._............... .......... .. .. . .........._... . ........ ........... ,................. • .::::::::::.:::.::•:: ., Q i — . II \ w I l / • -J• i ; II 0 4• I n f-T� w �j 1 I / • *. '• r' I I I 1 i � i i ; �- il • It • ! L I v ! dr i i In,,,tf 1V11I S,It1111 Irvav3 ■ mmonow■■■■■••■ .._ ____ --- Fi iiri -- -- --- rt — — --— —----Hi Ill7— 1111, ,I _I, _I ,,tR 4, i i :"" 0 1,1 1 ,I L. tui ,1 , NE 1 J.. „I_J 1111 HEN-11 ,-1 - r - I 'IL I-3 il sci 1 _ ' r -. I 1.,_I ,ii ,_ MU ,_. . 1 .1_1 ,1.?" 1 H-.] - ' Id di E n I ' , ,L I ,-1-.7 _. -1 ,I I _1! ii H A. , _ _ ,I, -I h - ,- ,-E--,-1 di - :_l ±J I— 17 I , 1 1 t ;- In_ i .' ri 1 1 „I 1 ,.! 1 I I• ill —.. 1 , 1, , L _ . , __L_j_ J._,.. .1_, 'L ' . _ , ,_1_,J 1 as ' ii u ' „L 4. r_17. . r.1,HI 1, ., a 1 _ : : 1 i i 1 hi!: ” 0 _ I 1, 1 L 1 1 1 . Ji 1 ' F 1 . 1 , li i ' I_J_ . is ei is isi is .; ;,, 'ii■ .. .J -• .a .o ai - ii 11 fi gi gi li ii !I ii u 11 ,1 '.. • .Z (6• 1V 0 $0 v101109 01 110011 --ii- " --.(e— ' .i2 - l ./111 .6/ " ./9 .6/ .ie 't-t: tt1 '4' • r:! ,, , 1 ... ILI l-j .I . -- -.-....., „ . „ ■ , d j . J tu . ,, I !,,, -)yl. 1 ',...-::s‘ I :,It ,1 L .-,, pliN -,x, ____. , ., _______ ___, _ ...limp - , • ,.,. . .- al ttv . L-a Wo. ri RECEIVED :t '! 2 s 1g92 1 I. I_ ith FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION . .. C `I itf./' Great Lakes Region, AGL-530 �- In Reply Refer To 2300 East Devon Avenue : AERONAUTICAL STUDY NO. Des Plaines, IL 60018 ; 91-AGL-2404-0E ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF NOTICE OF PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION OR ALTERATION PROPONENT: CONSTRUCTION LOCATION: Eagan MN Coca Cola Bottling Midwest Inc 2750 Eagandate Blvd. LATITUDE : 44-51-25. LONGITUDE: 093-09-08. St. Paul MN 55121 AGL AMSL WEIGHT: 95. ft 996. ft CONSTRUCTION PROPOSED: Steel Frame Building FREQUENCY: EFFECTIVE RADIATED POWER (ERP): The Federal Aviation Administration acknowledges receipt of notice dated 12/11/91, concerning the proposed construction or alteration described above: A study has been conducted under the provisions of Part 77 of the Federal Aviation Regulations to determine whether the proposed construction would be an obstruction to air navigation, whether ft should be marked and lighted to enhance safety in sir navigation, and whether supplemental notice of start and completion of construction is required to permit timely charting and notification to airmen. The findings of that study are as follows: The proposed construction is not identified as an obstruction under any standard of FAR, Part77,- Subpart C and would not be a hazard to air navigation. This determination expires on 07/15/93 unless: 40 (a) extended, revised or terminated by the issuing office; (b) the construction is subject to the licensing authority of the Federal Communications Commission and an application for a construction permit is made to the FCC on or before the above expiration date. In such case, the determination expires on the date prescribed by the FCC for completion of construction, or on the date the FCC denies the application. NOTE: Any request for extension of the effective period of this determination must be postmarked or delivered to the issuing office at least 15 days prior to the expiration date. If the structure is subject to the licensing authority of the FCC, a copy of this acknowledgement will be sent to that Agency. »» NOTICE IS REQUIRED ANYTIME THE PROJECT IS ABANDONED OR THE PROPOSAL IS MODIFIED «c< Remarks: Latitude end longitude based on site shown on your submitted map. Advise this office if you do not concur. Original Signed by Paulette L. Vernon Signed: Douglas F. Powers Issued In: Des Plaines, Illinois Manager, System Management Branch On: • l �� 1 RECEIVED F L 3 1 8 1392 • February 14, 1992 City of Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55122 Office of City Clerk Attention: E.J. Van Overbeke Gentlemen: Due to scheduling conflicts, Lexington will not have a representative at the public hearing to be held on February 25 regarding Midwest Coca-Cola Bottling Company's request for conditional use permit to allow a building over 40 feet in height in a light industrial district. We have met with the Coca-Cola people and we strongly support their proposal . We would like to encourage the city to allow this conditional use. We would appreciate it if you would make our feelings known at the hearing. \/\ Yours truly, • Richard D. Hanson President RDH/jkp • ! , fi ii Lexinton (Trrrp,S tandard (urporatioll 1243 ERQan Inriutrial 11au!,Minnncnt;i 55171 1612)4525650 fax 612-452 1207 MINUTES ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION FEBRUARY 25, 1992 COCA-COLA BOTTLING MIDWEST, INC. CONDITIONAL OBE PMMRtKIT Chairman Graves opened the next public hearing of the evening regarding a Conditional Use Permit to allow a building over 40' tall in a LI (Light Industrial) district located along the east side of Eagandale Boulevard in the NE 1/4 of Section 3. City Planner Sturm stated that City Staff felt that the proposed building will not create a negative visual impact. City Staff had no concerns with this application. Mr. Sturm mentioned that Lexington Standard Corporation, a neighbor of Coca-Cola, wrote a letter to the City stating their support to this proposal. Mr. Sturm noted that City Staff is impressed with and very supportive of this application. Norm Strofuss, a representative of the applicant, stated that the expansion was needed because of increased production. Hunter moved, Hoeft seconded, the motion to approve a Conditional Use Permit to allow a building over 40' tall in a LI (Light Industrial) district located along the east side of Eagandale Boulevard in the NE 1/4 of Section 3, subject to the following conditions: 1. This Conditional Use Permit must be recorded at the Dakota County Recorder's Office within 60 days of Council action. All present voted in favor. [(6 MEMORANDUM • TO: TOM HEDGES, CITY ADMINISTRATOR DALE RUNKLE, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR FROM: JIM STURM, CITY PLANNER DATE: FEBRUARY 27, 1992 RE: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT MIDWEST BOTTLING INC. At the February 25 Advisory Planning Commission meeting, the Conditional Use Permit to allow a building over 40' tall in a Light Industrial district was unanimously approved. The location is the Coca-Cola Midwest Bottling Plant along Eagandale Boulevard. There was no public comment on this item. Coca-Cola has been in Eagan since the mid-1960's and the facility is one of the largest in the world, last year producing 39 million cases. Approximately 23,000 sq. ft. of additional building will be added to the 500,000 sq. ft. facility. The addition is an automatic storage and retrieval system that would be 95' tall. Given a scale of the existing building, the 95' should not look out of place. The FAA has already given approval for the height. • If you would like to see a video tape of the storage and retrieval system, please let me know. Please contact me if you would like additional information on this item. City Planner JS/js • I4c\ Agenda Information Memo • March 2, 1992 City Council Meeting MAGNUM TOWING/OUTDOOR STORAGE/CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT E. Magnum Towing, To Allow Outdoor Storage on Lot 3, Block 1, Halley's 1st Addition, Located Along the West Side of Biscayne Avenue in the Southeast Quarter of Section 36--At its regular meeting of February 25, 1992, the Advisory Planning Commission met and considered an application for a conditional use permit from Kevin Mellon on behalf of Magnum Towing for a conditional use permit to allow outdoor storage at the above- referenced location. For additional information with respect to this application,please refer to the Co nmunity Development Department staff report which is enclosed on pages/S/ through / S G, for your review. The staff report includes a schematic indicating the relationship between the proposed Weston Hills Addition and the subject parcel. Enclosed on page/ s a copy of the Advisory Planning Commission minutes wit respect to this item. The APC is recommending approval. Finally, enclosed on pages a copy of a supplemental memorandum from the Community Development Department with respect to this application. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny a conditional use permit for Magnum Towing to allow outdoor storage on Lot 3, Block 1, Halley's 1st • Addition as presented. • ( co SUBJECT: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT APPLICANT: KEVIN MELLON (DBA MAGNUM TOWING) LOCATION: 4861 BISCAYNE AVENUE (LOT 3, BLOCK 1, HALLEY'S FIRST ADDITION) EXISTING ZONING: LIMITED INDUSTRIAL (LI) DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: FEBRUARY 25,11992 DATE OF REPORT: FEBRUARY 12, 1992 COMPILED BY: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT APPLICATION SUMMARY: An application has been submitted requesting a Conditional Use Permit renewal for outside storage of vehicles in the Limited Industrial zoning district. The site is located on the west side of Biscayne Avenue, north of Gun Club Road, and east of Highway 3. The site is zoned LI, however the Comprehensive Guide Plan designates this area D-I (Single Family Residential, 0-3 units per acre). COMMENTS: The applicant was initially granted a Conditional Use Permit for outside storage of vehicles on December 17, 1985. A condition of this approval limited the permit to two years at which time is would be reviewed for extension. The applicant was granted another two-year extension on March 15, 1988. City staff sent the applicant a Conditional Use Permit application and letter on May 18, 1990 explaining this Conditional Use Permit had expired on March 15, 1990. Mr. Mellon did not go before the Advisory Planning Commission until January 22, 1991. The City Council at its February 5, 1991 meeting approved a one-year extension. The site is surfaced with a Class 5 aggregate base. The drainage from the site consists of overland drainage swales typical of rural areas. City services are not available to this area and access is provided by an unimproved gravel street. If approved, this Conditional Use Permit shall be subject to the following conditions: 1. The permit shall expire two years from the date of Council approval. 2. Only storage of impounded and/or towed vehicles shall be allowed. 3. No "For Sale" signs shall be displayed and no sales or repair operations shall be conducted at this site. 4. This Conditional Use Permit and City Council resolution shall be recorded with the Dakota County Recorder within 60 days of approval. 5. All other City Codes shall be applicable. • S� � FINANCIAL OBLIGATION • 36-CU•1-1-92, Magnum Towing Based upon the study of the financial obligations collected in the past and the uses proposed for the property, the following charges are proposed. The charges are computed using the City's existing fee schedule and connections proposed to be made to the City's utility system based on the submitted plans. Improvement Use Rate Quantity Amount None IQ • • S� • ::/1.1 at_ 1 . t',1‘..4s,'1 * ,,:1 i •f / ; rti:,...1,....,....._..2.,., 4. r44.c.,74::z.:1 111,RilS/D, . If • r--- _ , ,.. ,..,.., -..., ..,...... 4' s: '..--7' . >. ,C. ,4, • i ...-.10.0, 7-1?,, ,.•••:•/' ft-4:z.4-..--,LAia- I **---•:,),,, It ' -'\ •%' !, w1Y-1'-' — 1 i .. . '• '.::NI _ scvm''IT*/r'l• ' , , ...;xr_s•, Pa*. „, ‘,..wtt,z.... 41 : ,!I ...A.1'. 1 1.0Ag•O*10 , . I, *4" .... \ •; .' ....., f■■.),..1% s I l'" :,) •1 .) i ./... ,• I - e..* \ ■. c-i- .r‘-,..)//,': . \: 7/4 ) ,fe,....:1 I .—..—... , ,A,,.; / i. .."Ly dor . 4.• 1. ... .... • . / .. . ,....,..., _ 7 /7 ii"C. SOO ' 1,. /.. •1`: r.Ir• -" ...7. ..... ,= i _. .., .. .1..;. " .. .. ...: g.: .-Ki.':■••,:-rn kl',....4 ••••.--vstos,- -44.. ,-• . i 1 1 I • 1 ; •■ --e. , !ncliKs 4ip 1:'-:* . , ,\ .--- :.:..,c:;,--• rap.— 1"iric 7,. ' ...N.... . s. _ , ovr.,,,.4 ,,,14-,,, , ii• 4...:. ,,, . . *.... • ,.F4,,t .2— 1 L - , C :. • Ntailk . .1. •Q . . , • "''' ,,\.i'-';',4:,..1-t•-;. '; \ i : ...-...-....; , . ..;...,.■;?...'"4 . .1 L.; . i. • •• , • •••4.4..,,,4'.0 •••,',.• .._..... 94 — •'.6. t" ! . '';•:1147 :(•• : ...'l •••"i•!V• .7 :...•.t• I T • :"•••“....44: k: '! • ‘‘. '• A ., • - •:!-•'-,,..;:-J•ist!'•' .i:.-.•.:..... • , A :.• cl: • v v i17:.•,-f " . . \.' Y Tik . ...‘4 ■• • r. ..:. , . ..- _;••...i■itr•';', rt.t'701.1‘,..010 ..'•-- •. * -.1 1 14.119( ....:31%. pic.... . . . .,.'vs .4,z...L.1*. .ill! r -.: i i• -' t I.' rt.', 4 ,.: LI (•••11 t c .a...:.•'i.re::.,i1:1•,.: ! •• aou : :•;••• ..-N.: — rn.c :s.h. 1,41.0:•)', -..04.1r.•. v.fi....r1:1'.6.• A PK 1 A f. rA i eit r.i+4.. ' -.1:.4.-.'fi 0 • l .'.!..,.1,:,i!,•'.-” 7. . i. w• • .../1.4.V.40., r..s.:‘,•:•4 •' i-• A.- a 13* • / 4.44* , 3 . • i. . i I 0 /C3 • L.rs,...44:-/.. 4.,.. - • izo , " '' / i u .• ' f e • a ' / 7/ ../,„( /. , . c.., -. sf . 4fr . 1 .. 4•II 21 i 1511:r1.444 41'1471'4: " ce.efold,e._ .4. I =3.sti.••• t c / *S 1.73r / / , / ' .... k\. 1:16, • w ,T, cip•-•744--rs44 k " Ni: 0 i / ,.:::::::::::::::::....x....x.:::::::::::::::. co ; 021-79 2 ::::::::::.::::::::.:.:.:1:.:.x.:.:.:.:..... .... ) .x.:.:.:....:•:.:::::::...::::::::::::::::Y%-cz 2 kk 1 ii::::::::::::::::*:•,:•:•::::•:•:Nio 1".1 • /1 5E 3 ' . i i , 1::::•••••••••:•:•:•:•:•:.:•:.:•:.•••••:*:•.' ¶ h •••••:•:•:•:.:.:•:•:••••:•:•:.:.::::::•:•:•:•:•: w LP-46'P-1 4 4 0 • .. 1 ›. C ,1 V,itri) cr c.) • _ _ MAC.H114Er..*( cn , .... ).- F IAJG• I -6 IA I I— .. r% \ X % . AriAT0 BoDr I • I 0 22-7 9 '• Ft,IC 1,-1pr vAcAl..IT , .. g ; MI it III 1.1 — p GU ti eLu - -'*- --; 4 CDC ■••••••111■101, -10 SIN Si. •IV • / ,,f° E :..,.., . , _ i • 1 7 p 0 isi 0 . I • • • . • gg i nifyil A /91 C o#.11:.1 rioNt . . • CLIFF ROAD PROPOSED WESTON HILLS ADDN / / :: .• ' : :. , - el / :.'•••01::://•:::77:1M4::•!::::::::::. .:::::::ii 4,- / .......:::::.,:::::.: .,.,::::::::::::: ..„....„.......• / • -..J.:;:::1:::-{ ..7:ii::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: :: ::::•:1;L:1 • / ,/ .s.:...::::1::::::::::.i:•'.•;.:::':•::::::,:::::::::::::::::::: ::::'' ,,::;:::::::::- —7:771 / y . j / , .: .. :.: _ _ '\ \ A 1 +; ••• �: k t /'Ii / :/ " 1 i * ..i . 1. .'� E •/ ' "'" ''.z'e'l ...!•• •::.::.:........::... .. .::::.. . :•:,,....,..,.,....... .::.:.:1 -,..-1 0 ,1 , 3 SINGLE FAMILY fi� 1 CONCEPT ,�' . ,:r,. , ;' ; V -4". ' 4- ' '' - i I II an- r; • /5 . --i - ' ; 1 �, 9/ \0 `ii _ �.,, .'• r II � r T : S , '� ' \ I }.. . 41.1411.1011.4440 MIMI., 'NI • //,i / _ SITE Z .� �• //_,/,/ a �-- - 1 (� ---•-1 4110 7( ' / tj .._J JI��1_.J J_�..1._...__\_ - ZJN aISLnYNE nUENU.!E ?rn 1 ►fnGE rr_n DRIVE wnv D.A. G IT . uln1H ` ;;:K PEtICE ---12 F1 . uI1r)E GnTE 1�— 28 �► • • t;' z IJ 2 r (f) Jim• • rsj a I !fLI IE S (;r I t iE POr,K SURrnCE i 3 L) - m ORPINnGE • 2 r T . Cnn I,t LINK FENCE — — Or`v r'E MINUTES ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION FEBRUARY 25, 1992 ZEVIN MELLON (DBA MAGNUM TOWING) CONDITIONAL USN PERK= Chairman Graves opened the next public hearing of the evening regarding a Conditional Use Permit to allow outdoor storage on Lot 3, Block 1, Halley's 1st Addition located along the west side of Biscayne Avenue in the SE 1/4 of Section 36. City Planner Sturm stated that City Staff's only concern with this application is that potentially there will be single-family homes in the near future in this area. That is the reason behind the 2-year limit on this application. Kevin Mellon, the applicant, stated that he understood why the 2-year limit was imposed. Member Hunter stated that he felt this site was not a public ' safety hazard and he approved of the application. Gorman moved, Hunter seconded, the motion to approve a Conditional Use Permit to allow outdoor storage on Lot 3, Block 1, Halley's 1st Addition located along the west side of Biscayne Avenue in the SE 1/4 of Section 36, subject to the following conditions: 1. The permit shall expire two years from the date of Council approval. 2. Only storage of impounded and/or towed vehicles shall be allowed. 3. No "For Sale" signs shall be displayed and no sales or repair operations shall be conducted at this site. 4. This Conditional Use Permit and City Council resolution shall be recorded with the Dakota County Recorder within 60 days of approval. 5. All other City Codes shall be applicable. All present voted in favor. MEMORANDUM • TO: TOM HEDGES, CITY ADMINISTRATOR DALE RUNKLE, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR FROM: JIM STURM, CITY PLANNER DATE: FEBRUARY 27, 1992 RE: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT MAGNUM TOWING At the February 25 Advisory Planning Commission meeting, the Conditional Use Permit for Magnum Towing to allow outdoor storage in a Light Industrial district was unanimously approved. The location is Lot 3, Block 1, of the Halley's 1st Addition. The applicant has had a Conditional Use Permit for this purpose on and off since 1985. The Council approved a one-year extension in February 1991 after the applicant failed to renew the permit the year before. There have not been any additional concerns raised in the past year and the condition calls for the permit to expire two years from the date of Council approval. It was noted that the entire area south of Cliff Road and east of Highway 3 in Eagan is designated D-I (Single Family, 0-3 units/acre). • If you would like additional information, please advise. City Planner JS/js • / 5s2 Agenda Information Memo March 2, 1992 City Council Meeting • PRELIMINARY PLAT/MIDWEST RESTAURANT ASSOCIATES/ TOWN CENTRE 70 - 12TH ADDITION F. Preliminary Plat, Midwest Restaurant Associates, Town Centre 70 - 12th Addition, Consisting of One Lot and One Outlot on Approximately 3.5 CSC (Community Shopping Center) Acres and a Conditional Use Permit to Allow On-Sale Liquor, 3.2 Beer or Wine, in a CSC District Located West of Town Centre Drive in the Northwest Quarter of Section 15--At its regular meeting of February 25, 1992, the Advisory Planning Commission considered an application for a preliminary plat at the above-referenced location to permit construction of an Applebee's Restaurant. For additional information with respect to this application, please referr‘to the Community Development Department staff report which is enclosed on pages/ CJthrough f73for your review. Following the Advisory Planning Commission meeting, staff met with the developer relative to Condition 10 as it appears in the staff report and APC minutes. Based upon that discussion, it is recommended that Condition 10 of the preliminary plat a proval be modified as reflected in the staff memorandum which is enclosed on page/ Enclosed on pagerichroughtleis a copy of the Advisory Planning Commission minutes with respect to this application. The APC is recommending approval of this application. Please note that the APC has added a twelfth condition to those indicated in the staff report. Please note as well that while the application includes a conditional use permit for on-sale liquor, 3.2 beer or wine, the liquor license has not yet been processed for consideration by the Council. Staff is in receipt of the license application and will process it for Council approval at such time as the construction is complete and the on-site inspection can be completed as part of the Police investigation. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny: 1) a preliminary plat for Midwest Restaurant Associates/Town Centre 70 - 12th Addition consisting of one lot and one outlot on approximately 3.5 CSC (Community Shopping Center) acres and 2) a conditional use permit to allow on-sale liquor, 3.2 beer or wine in a CSC district west of Town Centre Drive as presented. • ,S°77 SUBJECT: PRELIMINARY PLAT & CONDITIONAL USE • PERMIT (TOWN CENTRE 70 12TH ADDITION) APPLICANT: MIDWEST RESTAURANT ASSOCIATES LOCATION: OUTLOT A, TOWN CENTRE 70 9TH ADDITION EXISTING ZONING: CSC (COMMUNITY SHOPPING CENTER) DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: FEBRUARY 25, 1992 DATE OF REPORT: FEBRUARY 18, 1992 COMPILED BY: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT APPLICATION SUMMARY: An application has been submitted requesting a Preliminary Plat for one lot of 1.26 acres for a Class I restaurant and one Outlot of 2.25 acres for future development. Also requested is approval of a Conditional Use Permit to allow on-sale liquor, 3.2 beer or wine, in a CSC zoning district. EXISTING CONDITIONS: Currently the 1.26 acre site is vacant. It is located within the • Eagan Town Centre development directly south of Pizza Hut, west of Town Centre Drive, north of Mermaid Car Wash, and east of I-35E. The surrounding properties are zoned CSC (Community Shopping Center) and the Comprehensive Land Use Guide Plan designates this area as CSC (Community Shopping Center). SITE PLAN: The site plan shows a 5,016 sq. ft. Applebee's restaurant. The total number of seats, including bar seating, is 181. There are approximately 18 seats at the bar, and 10 high top tables with four seats per table. The remaining 123 seats are restaurant seating. • Total parking for the restaurant is 77 spaces. Sixty-one customer parking spaces have been provided (two handicap stalls included) and 16 employee parking spaces. These parking spaces shall be signed and striped. Code requires 60 parking spaces for the 181 seats available. The site is serviced by two access points along Town Centre Drive and the parking lot wraps around the building. The building itself is a brick, one-story building,with signage on the east and south sides. The plans show a 13'x 35' (approx.) concrete patio area on the south side of the building which will be used at a future time as an enclosed group dining area. At that time, it will be necessary to apply for a building permit. For now it will be used as restaurant patio seating. • A Conditional Use Permit for the pylon sign is unnecessary due to the Town Centre Pylon Sign Agreement. The pylon will not exceed 125 sq. ft. or 27' in height. All setback and lot coverage requirements meet, or exceed Code requirements. The Landscape Plan provides a mixture of plant material that will blend in nicely with other Town Centre projects. PARKS & RECREATION: The proposal shall be subject to a cash parkland dedication and a cash trailway dedication. • • (e) \ GRADING/DRAINAGE/EROSION CONTROL: This site was previously graded in 1985 • as a part of the initial development of Town Center 70, therefore, a limited amount of grading will be required to prepare this site for the building and parking lot improvements. Staff recommends that a 3' high berm be constructed along the west property line adjacent to I-35E right-of-way. The berm will provide a buffer and screen to the proposed parking lot of this site. Drainage from this site will be conveyed to the existing storm sewer system in Town Center Drive which drains northerly to Pond DP-4 which is a pond on the City's Comprehensive Storm Water Management Plan. The preliminary grading plan shows construction of storm sewer and catch basins to drain the proposed parking lot that will connect to the existing storm sewer in Town Centre Drive. The proposed storm sewer system on the north edge of the site will require the removal and replacement of Town Centre Drive to connect to the existing 36" line in the street. The proposed driveway on the south edge of the site is shown to be constructed where two existing catch basins are located. The existing castings of the catch basins shall be replaced with a drive-over type grate that will match the concrete apron of the driveway. This development shall extend the storm sewer along Town Center Drive to the south to provide a stub to serve Outlot A. This storm sewer stub will drain the 2.3 acres of Outlot A. In addition, this development shall add a catch basin on Town Centre Drive to the south side of the southerly driveway to handle the 500 feet of street runoff that drains from the south. The development will be responsible for installing and maintaining erosion control measures • in accordance with the City's Erosion/Sediment Control Standards. WATER QUALITY: This commercial development is located in Drainage Basin D and will discharge stormwater to Pond DP-4, an existing nutrient basin to the north. Runoff from the site will eventually reach LeMay lake, one of the six Class I lakes whose water quality is intended to be good enough to support direct contact recreation activities. LeMay Lake does not currently meet the water quality standards set for it in the Water Quality Management Plan. The site is too small to accommodate an on-site treatment basin so a cash dedication in lieu of ponding will be required by the city. Based on the actual amount of impervious area shown on the site plan (61%) and the size of the proposed developed area (1.3 acres), the cash dedication requirement is $10,710. That portion of the site platted as an outlot will be subject to an additional dedication when it is replatted for future development. UTILITIES: Sanitary sewer of sufficient size, capacity and depth has been stubbed to the property from Town Center Drive. The preliminary utility plan shows connecting to an existing 6" PVC sanitary sewer stub by constructing a manhole at the right-of-way line over the stub. Then the 6" sanitary sewer service is shown to be extended to the proposed building. Clean-outs will be required over this 6" line in 100' intervals. • 2'"- Water main of sufficient size, pressure and capacity is readily available to serve this development from an existing 8" water main in Town Center Drive. The preliminary utility • plan shows connecting to an existing 6" stub and extending that line to the proposed building. The existing hydrants along Town Center Drive will provide adequate fire protection to this site. STREETS/ACCESS/CIRCULATION: The preliminary site plan is proposing two driveway openings out to Town Center Drive. The northerly opening shall match the centerline of the existing driveway opening that goes to the shopping center to the east. Concrete aprons shall be constructed at each driveway opening as shown on the site plan. Also, the parking lot shall be constructed with concrete curb and gutter around the edge of the entire parking lot and it shall be surfaced with bituminous or concrete as per City Codes. RIGHT-OF-WAY/EASEMENTS/PERMITS: This development shall be responsible for ensuring that all regulatory agency permits are acquired prior to final plat approval. FINANCIAL OBLIGATION - Town Centre 70th 12th Addition Based upon the study of the financial obligations collected in the past and the uses proposed for the property, the following charges are proposed. The charges are computed using the City's existing fee schedule and connections proposed to be made to the City's utility system based on the submitted plans. Improvement Use Rate Quantity Amount None IQ There are levied assessments totaling $33,281.30 on the parcel, a portion of which will be planed. • (613 CONDITIONS FOR TOWN CENTRE 70 12TH ADDITION • 1. These standard conditions of plat approval as adopted by Council action on July 10, 1990 shall be complied with: Al, B1, B2, Cl, C2, C4, D1, El, Fl, 01, & H1 2. The site shall provide an irrigation system. 3. The Conditional Use Permit shall be recorded with the plat at Dakota County. • • 4. The attached trash/recycling enclosure shall be large enough to contain the trash dumpster and recycling containers. 5. A 3' continuous berm shall be constructed along the property line abutting I-35E. 6. A building permit shall be applied, and approved, for the group dining area. 7. No further building additions may occur unless equivalent amount of parking stalls are provided. 8. All signage shall conform to the Town Centre sign agreement and is subject to the one-time fee of $2.50/sq. ft. IS/ 9. This development shall extend the storm sewer along Town Centre Drive to the south to provide a stub to serve the 2.3 acres of Outlot A. 10. This development shall construct a catch basin on Town Centre Drive on the south side of the southerly driveway to handle the 500 feet of street runoff that drains from the south. 11. The northerly driveway opening to Town Centre Drive shall match the centerline of the existing driveway opening to the east. • STANDARD CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL A. Financial Obligations 1 . This development shall accept its additional financial obligations as defined in the staff 's report in accordance with the final plat dimensions and the rates in effect at the time of final plat approval. B. Easements and Rights-of-Way 1 . This development shall dedicate 10' drainage and utility easements centered over all common lot lines and adjacent to private property or public right-of-way. 2 . This development shall dedicate, provide, or financially guarantee the acquisition costs of additional drainage, ponding, and utility easements as required by the alignment, depth, and storage capacity of all required public utilities and streets located beyond the boundaries of this plat or outside of dedicated public right-of-way as necessary to service this development or accommodate it. 3 . This development shall dedicate all public right-of-way and temporary slope easements for ultimate development of adjacent roadways as required by the appropriate jurisdictional agency. • 4 . This development shall dedicate adequate drainage and ponding easements to incorporate the required high water elevation necessitated by City storm water storage volume requirements. C. Plans and Specifications 1 . All public streets and utilities necessary to provide service to this development shall be designed by a registered professional engineer in accordance with City codes, engineering standards, guidelines and policies. 2 . A detailed grading, drainage, erosion, and sediment control plan must be prepared in accordance with current City standards prior to final plat approval. 3 . This development shall insure that all temporary dead end public streets shall have a cul-de-sac constructed in accordance with City engineering standards. J STANDARD CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL PAGE TWO 4 . A detailed landscape plan shall be submitted on the proposed grading plan. The financial guarantee shall be included in the Development Contract and not be released until one year after the date of installation. 5 . All internal public and private streets shall be constructed within the required right-of-way in accordance with City Code and engineering standards. D. Public Improvements 1 . If any public improvements are to be installed under a City contract, the appropriate project must be approved at a formal public hearing by Council action prior to final plat approval . E. Permits 1 . This development shall be responsible for the acquisition of all regulatory agency permits in the time frame required by the affected agency. F. Parks and Trails Dedication 1 . This development shall fulfill its parks dedication 410 requirements as recommended by the Advisory Parks and Recreation Commission and approved by Council action. G. Water Ouality Dedication 1 . This development shall be responsible for providing a cash dedication in addition to/in lieu of ponding requirements in accordance with the criteria identified in the City 's Water Quality Management Plan. H. Other 1 . All standard platting and zoning conditions shall be adhered to unless specifically granted a variance by Council action. Advisory Planning Commission City Council Approved: August 25, 1987 September 15, 1987 Revised: July 10, 1990 plataprv. con LT5 *2 IIM � �Y Town Centre 70 12th Addition T-- — — — _ — —. — -- _ —-....-*�••. _ _ ——_ ——r — ra.�r- �� .. ;:* I ,__ t� ..: ■.. ° Tee•, «.T.c „w•••• r exec. t, •''JI •.,c• .. ..4.-.1._ ,q-- . ,igi, . i ag. i f) a .. • ' ..•• a.'- i�.01 s IC e ••••—�O.DRIVE_r•y—s TOWN -- CENR P•C r, �- •K .-.. / ti=•„' '•.•• •''r'..' • - '�~ �LW 0 r tEN• , i vim, t , \� ON • i . '- .A o 5� O t3 00 1 ( 0 � ... . CJ W .'Z .c) ' 0 (D • ,t, . -�i II a at4 N .�� �,: "'TOWN ----- • ENTRE 70 .a , - . I ` I a t C.) hi _____,Invn. ,,,,,,* i - ELEVEN ADD. • \ I ° O ie. — ,s. 4o i 0 •: , ! 'LoCK I I , i ` I T: O > " `Z • •• ,, �.. _�r'!__. i OUTIOT , // • • •° FRANKS ti `� '"�... I 41; ♦ NURSERY DUCKWOOD ' , I ' * �♦ = AND CRAFTS �'� .•.«•. ':G tOVXSSF 4 t SQUARE • }.... r 4>f' I i ; ADD I ' ii°o e ' ltocK i Roo, 1 I . .M .,,.. I '$!• , 4,4 y 1 rrr' mss,'! • --r.• R AND B •'',; 00\\ *°° '^o" —„,_, wows.*ADDITION ^� •.• W v H i Lr II! • E if et 4411; a s id s ` i=". CI- .. i 2. 22 >. S $� f3: i a . . iH i i r. C e E i; 4i y i� :� i.if i Y . diiq w . . Xj `So"1 L SE.€ i D : s 1 1117 • 1 ` i S"J ; a. tt5; ';YE-;1.E i `o11 r ' D ! - 0C11� .. i aie 1 l: :ea:. I !:all 1 ill! € i 1 5 1 1 { ;! 1G c`-ill i r; ' 1 : Y'!i`ox� z ' �1 . .. F. ..ZZ2 Pi: € : � a o — 'O g_„ s sue Z } e . O _ o 1 t X 0 ° tt f I 7 155 roc If 7 e _ Q t 1 r 'H r „.. _. ..._� : _.LL 0 i w I ;Et i - gif, :4... 1.;.::: // i .7: , s..„,,, ,. . S ri y � / .. \'^ \Et 1 CC 1 Z '' \\\..... • O s • 41 b1S •—. b..?14,, • 1 (.0i • • 0 • . • • e, \ \ / z / �ti ' , ,...4,4,?// N efilip- � , yw Sit* �> S NSF•. /o .44.4,. /* ,---- - 44i,„ToPP-..w ,,,,,:; 4. , 47 ., , ,,„.,.„. . • , /.. , . ti. �- �� � / /,:f . • ♦♦ ' ' b fiis,' -// ' '' .' ' 9 \ e ill m / Id/ S° 'o 1 N -i- -/ 410./ 4* /► ` \� ii • • It ti =rm - . ,, 4114414),Nr. ,,, 410` -in R G \ 4. . . 7/ z \ /X - -c5 . 4ce r g4.o 8 cm-c i 7 O Z Z \ n • N r X ii i li -\1 y. 111i ii i !ti IN N. 3I 11. c cri ■-r. Fri ,.. .:1 I L 1 , Im 0 �3 s .. jlss s [e € ,> I :1. 1 jz ilEE Ii= • 0 - . -c E u• -.,E '-. ._...... . .. . w RUST ARCHITECTS ............... N:. ' EAGAN TOWN CENTER ra..« w..wr r.a fwT mtur arEwr.-o.,E aL "' ee's u+,o rim e, EAGAN, MN f • • r_ 1 - c p _a m D ' £ . .c Z• ~ I �• ' i i=;:-.k 3..... . piz.,.,1t,l,t;. ;1.1i e 1,,,, Ise ? z;� " -s+ a • 9 �i .Y uK°. "MNO N� rr• X 4 T P 5 1 I a824a22u;333saaagi3 s ,i_._ (7-' . _ A - 0 A-1:6 - ..,..\`',.;,._'.1 - 0 f� ;1 _ _ I\ // ..._,.7.1 .•.-i,C. ..,6. , 4- Vis'. kl . -• I /� II I I / .J\w \ _ � / }.J� f 4 ° �� y I / \ �/ 1 Qr I r • ----_-_,-"-----...„, , 64 , 1. I : t xii , T. r I ~'' j= k? ; . fie`, G� r ; ki. • h t >k7 '- \ \ I \ �0 ,(77.••:.,::.,c -,/< ° 0 \ \�' :5 ids' O O rri C-r c= `; I m —;-0 } ;z -,: �s ., 1 A3 1 LT, ^ � � I i1 S P € � .: Ii P £ � 1:; E1___ R to=� i 1 tS 3 = i 'Ill IV i Z 1 "F E - e E • Et: -i ee p :: t i St i - I °a t v 7 a S i Z ii 4I �. k s m_ ..II.,- s • d o i r L 7 A RUST ARCHITECTS • .:i" -. ` _�_� 1 + MO[r�ia ueiur.rr fM 4�a� Mf,{ TM/T0:`, WNNES°TA •, iYfr •rf _�� _ ., l� rneoyr.e or' r.re 1eTf{f011, E {{1,0 � .rE h.r ,{1�1.f{-1{1i e E C.re •we l 1/ D', • t� ' ' 11f' i1 't£ ii= 1 • 7 i H i i _ I !; i • E\ <i� \ 'ems •ii i I :•-•:-... \ 1 1.9 11 kr.., . Ili!Ili i if I i • It: �_ = f i £'i; , ii i it �, • m \ Npl\ \ FO t iz ` ... \\ : � gB rip . o . ,..y \ \ , 4/ : . it' 4 * .., • \ v T 4 ... .-----1 7..: m ...::‘,.. .:y \ , _ .,, -..,.:. 'i ,.... ..... 7.4..,.„1:_ .z..,. . ,.. , it 4 • - 4,, --...„., i , :-....-t- ic-- ' ..,. .-- ' 1 ?- . I..., . r >z 1.11. \ •,,4s. ' , -,. i''' g g `e i 0 ■ /> s - e �� � . r4.` e.. C _ •E f; ' Z• \ 3 aoo Jo \ � \ o m --.....„\s> -,..„ 74.....,,, ..: , „III ... m \\ \�x`.. \ —),...Z,* .<4. Ica �.\ \• \ z. $ .i ; , , // its \ `, � i l jJI D " 1 1 eri 1 0 �- 1;1 li II „, ,--.:Es I i I i e. _ R R t 2 if •- -R#ifs ° ' � t � ` I' K1x tg l c z � I 0 11 � — . . ... . _. • • r ry,4•yr . .. .....2L.4.4, 11,. ......W.4&,r,411..Irt ■ 0 1,.. ■ . • .. : • li tl Z. -- '.2 • • • i '• Ei. ' • .._ s. , i pf . Iii .•• _ . ; . g , 0 ' :,,, 1 ,L.,..„:,01;1 , . • ' ., , ,!_IL:up- .. ,.., . 7: ...., Ill '4'.ni, _. •ik-s' :i,. 0 1•• 0. ' I". ' 11 j'1.1 '1 ''' .*:1* 1.. C II ' ' 1 ' X 1■.i i , 127 ma.,..: : e:4 111111,,,t41.!t.T2E, , • . . • • , H111,1 1 - .nAlio —1. m , 6._ x, BEEEB jail'111,11! m! tamil.111M v-,• ; .' , , , i , 1,. 1 _ ,, , . ,, m I-' '1'1 1111 ',!r1. r,l'r 3 1 p. . i > 11-- , .,1 ■,11, , ,i- i. i' m —...,, . -4 >' Itio.i1 ,1 di 1 TIri1p1 a j f.. 1,111,' _ 111 I :-..4' , ="---• , -■.. ,:..- , . Z.• ----11 '111•:,1.111111i1,;!i!I . 3■ ilt.- :.,, ". ,„ .°:. ' L- s■,, HI- ' , --12 1■1•1!I'l ,,,,I: 0._, 1 * .11 • r„... i •,1'111.1 sr.], , -- . il dlohillioll.1-, - - . I [ 1111111•11•1■ ..II I Hill'i 1.1=1E1,IF 1 . 1' • 11111 • .. --- -,rim tri . • il) f . - • .• 0 r, , • •••_ . • ,,.• ....... .. , 11111111 -'• • • . 1•111 ;• 1 ,3g ...... 3. 1 , EIN i. • ••,• :_,,, ,, 1., :21.1t qz / I ' - 1 IY111,111.:.1'.Iivii 1 11 3i,;. , .: I ' ■,. IIME Rc, ' •. .1 i =:i`7-'.'71 17 r .1l1:-, -- • m 1111 ,• • • c. .4 I: ''11101•0.11111;15a.11z114 k'. . I 1 6 ilk ,4 ,I. 'H'' II. I•I I! 1I '' , ;)?. : . . -., l'i I II:IIIII.I I •,.a.-.4.: '—'''' • V ;Jr; 1, i Lli ?is, •-- : -,.... .-- it • t., .._..... a .1 lig 5' 113PP..- , , P." ,C t -.-,• • . •: , ;:- /p--- m, i ...., 1,1 1 ----- 7-'---• I r°•• " / .. Q.1 ,..------ , .. _ IIIII'I .1 * th. ;. 1 1'• ' I,........ i 4 -.MIIIIMIN, . ,--•-- ",,— "'" I 11 - '1111 111, 4 il 'l litir//1- • ' • 1 , ..., t 1 1-.1 11 :'' ' ',• '•ei ' I: -' \ 4Y' . -, r - , , fu E :. -2-4:4. . 1 • . • ' III 1,.H.1 1 or.,,.• . 1 I 0 . r 1 • .;,.il.:Ij...i j!''111;7''i:',11'.!!'111., „ 1 ., ?T • le • • 0 a 1 HI•''r li i•'' ;.l'•I 1 i'''•:iiii'' ir: 4i A • • • . , • • A . . • I 1‘,.'•1 I . . . . 11 • 0 41 I I l'.'1 11/!.•I! IIL•f›.2 I:1 ll A , 1 ,I . • •Ii 41•1•illi'• j: l!',':1,” ,II ll'i • I •.. ' '1' ".'..•• • • • Ei 7. 1 7'. '' 'I 111;:i•ii 041 I!I i•I•I'''•11!:1 1111'0 1 ' ''• V•••j• 1 l' ' •V I I • 11:!111 l'i I'. f2 1 • ' • a 11,1.11.1111!ti.11:11021 I l'Il l I r . , d I,Alt. - P . • • • ,.... ,i,..,. PletilL.1-1:1 I .:friar i : ;!fltfIlf Si l ' I II! 11! = = it:Ig! ' :=1!IIIi! rg Fit II ;i:IE!, :. i ' II-!1.tri - 1 : 1111 •11.;--a•1 iili: Er li 1:-.1 F3tt ' 3 ' • I lii>E7+F, 21 ,./t.-4 il 1 / ii„:1. :. . I: .ii- I:I; • , t - .. 1 i ill 1 . l' :Ill ti,ir . •-: ! --r . ; 2 • . . .1 I 6 : t I x 1 Ii I , E I Irl ti r II : IV • ' . • E # I • 11 = .e e's EAGAN ATGOAWNN, MCENTER • .:wDo:r•■:•i_s•:S:•t■..•.o"..w 3".-.*_e.".3. ...•."...■,..",.,-...17.O..M......"...."..,=......M1..a."......,—., , ORIgMUt)e 0Sr.0..-T r10.u13 A z RCIIITEIMCIONTIMSMOS T•O [r7!ri il i-4-17--•ri---x—rit--"tr-, • ,,,,g,-n4'11 "114-i 1 --7.°":4,47 . -•'.\ -\\////' si E l R ' a i'1-11) ,-c..s. '/.04):0`�`�'0r b-h _-` � P�- \� �� r+ i-_ 4; I. DP_I5' °-+, 1. r le. --;,/ ,,1.70 .7 F . `moot i '` II �, �i -1 , ii• 8.! cc 6-::::;-3? ,2, ow,. .• . , 12 : Apes --17 i i 0 f �.folk; n L{ A �gis 76.0, �1 \` • .I , -/i ENO L.S.-30 a t�A i97,►�3O • \ \• - u , . --- ' `Ifni f i 1 1 t. r 1-151 1� S c fi i6• 88 SY `` th % 1,J r - r - 88 .0,/ 86.0 DP-6 _� IP_5 a e.s 857.3! -• 873.0'• ���� 875.9 .... i —- B-- _ e . . i I . �313.� \. , � , P-26 48' DP-4 . . ++ • gg 7gp L.S.-T `�� C-h I .;,,87 t + :�, 878.5• X14» 3 , t r, ∎C";n� .. — . ...■....___ ■ 0 Q J A,pb� .l 1 , f RE i ,,�M., y,�, f ; 901- .a C N ; ,''!''017 , T,?WN ' F QP 2 90 ICY) Ret . -7\ ii‘ (C— ) ;:1„,... ,/, I ';')"410 :a `105 T. 4.(77. unrorgeitk ! ..- t� � ,) r► R. �•Ar':� � l);` ,tit` i FIGURE No. 17 STORM SEWER LAYOUT MAP CITY OF -. le- EAGA • MEMO TO: JIM STURM, CITY PLANNER FROM: JOHN P WINGARD, DEVELOPMENT/DESIGN ENGINEER DATE: FEBRUARY 27, 1992 SUBJECT: TOWN CENTRE 70 - 12TH ADDITION City staff met with the developers of the Town Centre 70 - 12th Addition development on February 27, 1992, to discuss Condition #10 of the preliminary plat approval. Following is Condition #10 as shown in the staff report: This development shall construct a catch basin on Town Centre Drive on the south side of the southerly driveway to handle the 500 feet of street runoff that drains from the south. The developer feels that the Condition of adding the catch basin on Town Centre Drive to handle the flow from a future development of Outlot A is not necessary at this time. The developer feels that the two existing catch basins on Town Centre Drive that lie in the southerly driveway to the Applebee' s site will handle the flow with Outlot A in its undeveloped state. The two existing catch basins will be reconstructed with a flat grate to allow the cars to drive over them and this will reduce the capacity of the existing catch basins somewhat. A drainage study of this area shows that the Town �, Centre Drive right-of-way will produce about 2 . 6 cfs that will drain to these two existing catch basins. Also, the undeveloped Outlot A will produce about 1.9 cfs during a 5-year rainfall event. The total of these two flows of 4 . 5 cfs should not exceed the capacity of the two existing catch basins with the flat grate. Please modify Condition #10 of preliminary plat approval to read as follows: The future development of Outlot A of Town Centre 70 - 12th Addition shall construct a catch basin on Town Centre Drive on the north lot line extended to handle the 450 feet of street runoff that will drain from the south. Development/Design Engineer JPW/jj cc: Tom Colbert, Director of Public Works Mike Foertsch, Assistant City Engineer c-14- MINUTES ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION PAGE 1 OF 2 FEBRUARY 25, 1992 TOWN CENTRE 70 12TH ADDITION =DEIST RESTAURANT ASSOCIATES Chairman Graves opened the next public hearing of the evening regarding a Preliminary Plat consisting of one lot and one outlot on approximately 3.5 CSC (Community Shopping Center) acres and a Conditional Use Permit to allow on-sale liquor, 3.2 beer or wine, in a CSC district located west of Town Centre Drive in the NW 1/4 of Section 15. City Planner Sturm stated that the only concern City Staff had regarding this application was the fact that more trees are needed in the back of the lot. Mr. Sturm noted that the applicant has been very responsive and cooperative to staff concerns. Charles Bartholdi, representative of the owner of the site, reviewed the background of the application and felt that this proposal was a natural continuation of Town Centre. Bill Rust, architect for the applicant, stated that the building would have a brick exterior with rust, green and beige awnings. It would have a flat roof. Member Hoeft requested that a condition be added that requires metal screening of the ventilation equipment on the roof of the building. Member Griggs suggested that oak trees be added to the landscaping plan. Merkley moved, Hoeft seconded, the motion to approve a 410 Preliminary Plat consisting of one lot and one outlot on approximately 3.5 CSC (Community Shopping Center) acres located west of Town Centre Drive in the NW 1/4 of Section 15, subject to the following conditions: 1. These standard conditions of plat approval as adopted by Council action on July 10, 1990 shall be complied with: Al, B1, B2, Cl, C2, C4, Dl, El, Fl, G1 & H1 2. The site shall provide an irrigation system. 3. The Conditional Use Permit shall be recorded with the plat at Dakota County. 4. The attached trash/recycling enclosure shall be large enough to contain the trash dumpster and recycling containers. 5. A 31 continuous berm shall be constructed along the property line abutting I-35E. 6. A building permit shall be applied, and approved, for the group dining area. 7. No further building additions may occur unless equivalent amount of parking stalls are provided. 8. All signage shall conform to the Town centre sign agreement and is subject to the one-time fee of $2.50/sq. ft. 9. This development shall extend the storm sewer along Town Centre Drive to the south to pre a stub to serve the 2.3 acres of Outlot A. ��\ PAGE 2 OF 2 10. This development shall construct a catch basin on Town Centre Drive on the south side of the southerly driveway to handle the 500 feet of street runoff that drains from the south. 11. The northerly driveway opening to Town Centre Drive shall match the centerline of the existing driveway opening to the east. 12. A metal screening of the ventilation equipment on the roof of the building shall be required. All present voted in favor. Markley moved, Hoeft seconded, the motion to approve a Conditional Use Permit to allow on-sale liquor, 3.2 beer or wine, in a CSC district located west of Town Centre Drive in the NW 1/4 of Section 15. All present voted in favor. Member Hoeft left the meeting at this point. • 1 `G/ . Agenda Information Memo March 2, 1992 City Council Meeting COMPREHENSIVE GUIDE PLAN AMENDMENT/REZONING/PRELIMINARY PLAT/ INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT 196/ELEMENTARY SCHOOL #17 G. Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment, Independent School District 1%/Elementary School#17,from D-1 (Single Family) to PF (Public Facilities) a Rezoning of Approximately 15 Acres from AG (Agricultural) to PF (Public Facilities), and a Preliminary Plat Consisting of One Lot for an Elementary School Located Along the South Side of Wescott Road, East of Denmark Avenue in the Northeast Quarter of Section 22--The applicant has requested that this item be continued to the March 17, 1992 City Council meeting. By way of information, however, it should be noted that the Advisory Planning Commission considered these applications at its regular meeting of February 25, 1992. A copy of the Commuryity Development Department staff report with respect tot is item is enclosed on pages through for your review. Also enclosed on pages al through a6is a copy of the APC minutes with respect to these applications. The APC has recommended denial on all three applications. Finally, enclosed on page Slis a supplemental memorandum from the Community Development Department with respect to the public hearing. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny a continuance of these items to the March 17, 1992 regular City Council meeting as requested by the applicant. • I el /1 SUBJECT: REZONING, COMPREHENSIVE GUIDE PLAN AMENDMENT, PRELIMINARY PLAT, ELEMENTARY SCHOOL #17 APPLICANT: INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT #196 CALVIN ZWIEFEL LOCATION: NE 1/4 SECTION 22 EXISTING ZONING: AG (AGRICULTURAL) DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: FEBRUARY 25, 1992 DATE OF REPORT: FEBRUARY 18, 1992 COMPILED BY: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT APPLICATION SUMMARY: Separate applications have been submitted by Independent School District 196 requesting the following: a Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment from D-I (Single Family) to PF (Public Facilities), a Rezoning of 15 acres from AG (Agricultural) to PF (Public Facilities), and a Preliminary Plat consisting of one lot and one Outlot for an elementary school located along the south side of Wescott Road and east of Denmark Avenue in the NE 1/4 of Section 22. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This 15-acre site is located south of Wescott Road, east of Windcrest Addition, and west of the Westbury Addition and park. The Windcrest Addition is zoned PD (Planned Development) with R-1 (Single Family) and R-2 (Duplex) abutting this site. Westbury Addition is also zoned PD and with Single Family use. To the north (across Wescott Road) and south of the site, the area is zoned Agricultural. The site is • guided D-1 (0-3 units/acre) by the City's Comprehensive Land Use Guide Plan. SITE PLAN: The 15-acre school site will abut Wescott Road and will take access from a newly-created north/south street. The two-story school building is 78,965 sq. ft. and is located on the eastern half of the site. This proposal is very similar to Pinewood Elementary School at Dodd Road and Diffley Road. The main entrance to the all brick building is from the south where the two parking lots are located. The visitor parking and drop-off area has 17 parking spaces and staff parking and the bus loading and unloading lane has 81 parking spaces available. A future drive/access point has been indicated on the plan to where this will occur when the north/south street off Wescott Road is developed further south. The plans show two fields-two softball fields and a hard/soft play surface which wraps west around the building to the north side along Wescott Road. A fence will be placed between the playing field and Wescott Road. The proposed plan meets, or exceeds all setback requirements and parking requirements. COMMENTS: The elementary school has a capacity of 775 children, ages Kindergarten through fifth grade, with approximately 30 classrooms and 40 professional teachers. The school will be open for the 1993 school year. A neighborhood meeting has been scheduled for Thursday evening, February 20, at Oak Ridge Elementary School. 4110 gri GRADING/DRAINAGE/EROSION CONTROL: The grading that will be required for the • proposed elementary school will require cuts of 30' along the east property line and fills of up to 18' in the southwest corner of the site. The construction of the proposed street along the east property line of the site will require grading outside of the plat. At the southerly terminus of the street the grading plan shows a-24' cut. A majority of the site will be disturbed to grade this site. However, the trees along the west property line and in the northwest corner of the site are proposed to be saved. The developer shall provide the City with a tree protection plan and specification defining their efforts to preserve trees during the construction process. The drainage plan for this development proposes to direct the runoff from this site directly to Pond JP-11. The storm sewer that will serve this site will need to be extended by this development along the south side of Wescott Road to the portion of Pond JP-11 that is on the south side of Wescott Road. Pond JP-11 is a designated ponding area in the City's Comprehensive Storm Drainage Plan. The final drainage plan shall include a catch basin at the southeast corner of the parking lot to collect the runoff from the parking lot. The 5 year flow rate in the parking lot at this point is approximately 4 cfs and this is a maximum runoff allowed along the curb. The catch basin shall be located on the upstream side of the future driveway opening that will be constructed when the street is extended to the south. The development will be responsible for installing and maintaining erosion control measures in accordance with the City's Erosion/Sediment Control Manual Standards. Special care shall be taken to minimize erosion from this site into Pond JP-11. WATER QUALITY: The elementary school development will be located in the lower reach of drainage basin J. Stormwater runoff from the site will be discharged first to Pond JP- 11.1, a nutrient trap just south of Wescott Road. After flowing through two other intervening ponds, the water will be discharged to Fish Lake. Fish Lake is designated a • Class I direct contact recreation lake but does not currently meet the water quality standards necessary to support all desired uses. The City will accept a cash dedication in lieu of on-site ponding to meet water quality treatment needs. Using the methodology outlined in the water quality management plan, the cash dedication for this development is: 0.41 acres x $23,805/ac. for schools = $ 9,760 1.32 ac. ft. x 1,613 cu. yds. x $2/cu. yd. = $ 4,750 TOTAL $ 14,510 UTILITIES: The preliminary utility plan proposes to construct an 8" sanitary sewer line from the intersection of Windcrest Avenue and Denmark Avenue to the northeast to serve the proposed school. The sanitary sewer construction will require street removal and replacement of Windcrest Avenue and Denmark Avenue and also the sewer line will cross through lots along the east side of Denmark Avenue along the north side of the Williams Brothers pipeline. The existing 8" sanitary sewer in Windcrest Avenue and Denmark Avenue have sufficient capacity and depth to serve the proposed school. The preliminary • utility plan does not propose to construct any sanitary sewer in the proposed street along the east property line. When the property to the east develops, then sanitary sewer will need to be constructed in the east boulevard of the street to serve that property. Watermain of sufficient size and capacity is readily available to serve this site from the existing 12" trunk watermain in Wescott Road. The preliminary utility plan proposes to connect to the 12" watermain in Wescott Road in two locations and then loop a proposed 8" watermain through this site and around the building to provide adequate fire protection and water supply to the school. The final utility plan shall include water services to the property to the east of the proposed street to serve the future lots along the east side of the street. STREETS/ACCESS/CIRCULATION: The preliminary site plan shows a street to be constructed in the northeast corner of the site that would connect to Wescott Road. The street would extend to the south for approximately 400' and the street would be a publicly maintained street built to City standards. At the southern terminus of the proposed street is where the school's driveway would connect. Due to the rolling terrain in this area some fairly steep slopes are necessary to serve the school. The proposed street will have a section of 8% street grade and the proposed driveway to the school off of the street will have a section of 6% slope. The intersection of the proposed street with Wescott Road is shown to be located at a section of Wescott Road that has a 5.68% slope. The proposed street shall be constructed to a 36 foot wide face to face width with concrete curb and gutter. Also, concrete valley gutters shall be added at the intersection of Wescott Road and where the driveway will connect to the proposed street. EASEMENTS/RIGHT-OF-WAY/PERMITS: A 60 foot wide right-of-way is proposed for the street along the east edge of the site as shown on the preliminary plat. Since Lot 1, Block 2 of this addition will not have sanitary sewer service provided to it, the lot shall be platted as an outlot. This development shall be responsible for ensuring that all regulatory agency permits are acquired in a timely manner. The construction of the sanitary sewer line in the easement of the Williams Brothers Pipeline will require a permit to be obtained from Williams Brothers. Also, an easement will be needed for the sanitary sewer line as it crosses through the lots along the east side of Denmark Avenue. The grading work that will be performed outside of the plat along the east property line will require a slope easement from the adjacent property owner. Also, the grading that will be performed in the Williams Brother Pipeline will require a permit from that agency. • 1g ( PARKS & RECREATION: The proposal is not subject to parks dedication.However Public SFacilities are obligated to pay toward trails dedication; the amount for this project is$12,810. Staff has concerns regarding tree preservation on this project. There are many mature oak trees. Staff has determined with minimal changes to the grading plan, utilizing minimal height retaining walls or realigning facility locations, many of these trees could be saved. Staff is recommending that the applicant submit a tree protection plan and tree specific preservation revisions to the City prior to Final Plat. FINANCIAL OBLIGATION - Wescott School Addition Based upon the study of the financial obligations collected in the past and the uses proposed for the property, the following charges are proposed. The charges are computed using the 110, City's existing fee schedule and connections proposed to be made to the City's utility system based on the submitted plans. Improvement Use Rate Quantity Amount Water Availability P.F. $2,470/acre 14 ac. $ 34,580 Charge Lateral Benefit P.F. 9.95/ff 691.07 ff 6,876 Water Trunk Storm P.F. .104/sf 609,840 sf 63,423 Sewer Trunk Storm S.F. .069/sf 21,780 sf 1.503 Sewer Total )106382 There are levied assessments totaling $136,988.92 attached to the parcels, a portion of which will be platted. CONDITIONS FOR ELEMENTARY SCHOOL #17 • 1. Thees standard conditions of plat approval as adopted by Council action on July 10, 1990 shall be complied with: Al, Bi, B2, B3, Cl, C2, C3, C4, C5, D1, El, Fl, 01, & H1 2. The applicant shall submit a tree protection plan and tree specific preservation revisions to the City prior to Final Plat. 3. The storm sewer that will serve the site shall be extended to Pond JP-11 by this development. 4. A catch basin shall be added to the southeast corner of the parking lot on the upstream side of the future driveway. 5. This development shall be responsible for providing a cash dedication of $14,510 to meet water quality treatment needs. 6. The final utility plan shall include water services to the property to the east of the proposed street to serve the future lots along the east side of the street. 7. The proposed street along the east property line of the site shall be a public street built to City standards. 8. Proposed McCarthy Drive is to be constructed to 36 foot wide, face of curb to face of curb. 9. Since the proposed 60 foot wide right-of-way is insufficient to accommodate the proposed sidewalk along McCarthy Drive,the development is required to construct the proposed sidewalk on school property. • ?.5 STANDARD CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL 40 A. Financial Obligations 1 . This development shall accept its additional financial obligations as defined in the staff's report in accordance with the final plat dimensions and the rates in effect at the time of final plat approval . B. Easements and Rights-of-Way 1. This development shall dedicate 10' drainage and utility easements centered over all common lot lines and adjacent to private property or public right-of-way. 2 . This development shall dedicate, provide, or financially guarantee the acquisition costs of additional drainage, ponding, and utility easements as required by the alignment, depth, and storage capacity of all required public utilities and streets located beyond the boundaries of this plat or outside of dedicated public right-of-way as necessary to service this development or accommodate it. 3 . This development shall dedicate all public right-of-way and temporary slope easements for ultimate development of adjacent roadways as required by the appropriate jurisdictional agency. 4 . This development shall dedicate adequate drainage and pending easements to incorporate the required high water elevation necessitated by City storm water storage volume requirements. c. Plans and Specifications 1 . All public streets and utilities necessary to provide service to this development shall be designed by a registered professional engineer in accordance with City codes, engineering standards, guidelines and policies. 2 . A detailed grading, drainage, erosion, and sediment control plan must be prepared in accordance with current City standards prior to final plat approval. 3 . This development shall insure that all temporary dead end public streets shall have a cul-de-sac constructed in accordance with City engineering standards. 411 STANDARD CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL PAGE TWO 4 . A detailed landscape plan shall be submitted on the 411 proposed grading plan. The financial guarantee shall be included in the Development Contract and not be released until one year after the- date of installation. 5 . All internal public and private streets shall be constructed within the required right-of-way in accordance with City Code and engineering standards. D. Public Improvements 1 . If any public improvements are to be installed under a City contract, the appropriate project must be approved at a formal public hearing by Council action prior to final plat approval . E . Permits 1 . This development shall be responsible for the acquisition of all regulatory agency permits in the time frame required by the affected agency. F. Parks and Trails Dedication 1 . This development shall fulfill its parks dedication requirements as recommended by the Advisory Parks and Recreation Commission and approved by Council action. G . Rater Oualitv Dedication 1 . This development shall be responsible for providing a cash dedication in addition to/in lieu of ponding requirements in accordance with the criteria identified in the City 's Water Quality Management Plan. E. Other 1 . All standard platting and zoning conditions shall be adhered to unless specifically granted a variance by Council action. Advisory Planning Commission City Council Approved: August 25, 1987 September 15, 1987 Revised: July 10, 1990 plataprv.con LTS *2 • V,BiLititui ---"")._,. tv t:4E1_sx...\ , . d I! V.,' - ? , rii, \ ;1 ,c,■014-. ' .&-, i .A, ... u ,, — .4, 1 •r‘_. i ,. SE nt° 41, . ---oltunK i.. '• . _.... • E u NMARK ,;.,)_ 4 - • - 4' WO -.!-Ifria0Pt --,.) - -- - =•.....- ---: : LOCATION a u •, I i etrorEft L A r 51Fil , -.ff II smut-LA, t 44.4pc ZiA,,I. I * ....k....e... 5 1-1.1jDR ;.41.11 •ems--Dk. ( , _ . _ , 4 .,,, ,. .•.z , le0- rE.s,:ctid. ,-.---- r) ... ,, ,,),„,_L ,j ® 1_ ,- . • il.,}4 ' • P/CAI :41;1' 47.' lit. - 11! awry. i —.— .. r...g... - - .1.. - 4-19rirr",-,^1•-■•71 tr...- - M ,11 \ ` c1 .1.1 '-)) -------1 NI • . .. . A .i.t.,1"1!:.-...1.: , I--R'-I k '- i 1. -1'A --4 t ,ivi l!lol 1..( f • at %. • ."1144%.. it, N.t..1 15 \s : 1 ;It!MIL VoZt lo . t . ZONING ,i - . [try *.•■••81.14...■-4 •."--.Y. -..., 41r; ..•Ailial-li 1 'i HALL I" "'''3I • 01) I., P- ' .A, ", , p --- •- ::"''•'it , I ...2 ortsioir * ■ . „.VI z..- :.: :.!!• '' :It, - it(::::,,,if ' ' • ---7.„7,77- 1- ' 11 lifi. -•,,;ki : ,• ,i.:4,;; i , ni.) : • , VI ..._. ;.....1 "..... .7.. I il (1., 11 (', l' fir! :--...7:1i"•ii I ,._ ..•cu. r . ....... . r•) •\ 1,2...,5N [ lt.".... I , P - 1 • .L.• ,,./timp.:0, , 5 - •1.__ _ __ . \■ 1 1 IJ-It v.4"J., lk* I DO\ \_, I L II 4,--)\---r ,....\. \/ ./ -:-..-._ 4//,,•/. --1 ?,4-LnA t-"" ---.. N '— PF ---7 **-2) I- ',won 171,. 1 0 5(n 1 1 ET ® PF GUIDE PLAN f D-II D-I . -...--_ atk t ' . - . 1. 4 I • - -- - - -- --- ' <I` tr . i PF D-I II 7 Q ...., . C - 1--- • . ...., [\.117■■••■ 1 . '- P..../4. ••• lPF. —r7ir...--;vt :., ,__, / 1 -- --;--, - - ( go . >-r- : mow .. o I s aw Wog � I �, a Z we 3 O ¢ a n 'ii - W=0 • Q$a ii:: N r T k , `, Q 0 ° /C W Q 4 . /—.-- Q�• ',i-,.2 / i ! . ! i 4 �- i' 1r4r3 '1"r — / • / _-- w. , \ . .111 0 0 0 _ 0 I _ `' =-_ f s y y1, CC W\' a U . u r t• 143 a3 _t i / f \\� Q • t ,ry 11 Z J1 i 2 V °r yi -�f L.. }- °' / iii -�'' ! is 1 'e. ^ •r 'lr - i 2 �_j:-.r.'"$-. =- _ Tip- �.= _ / - I ' I_ ' ..:::5: _ W ..-"-- 1 -_-3 - , \.' . '---"--------- ' .‘x\ -----'" ----- ------- I_ \'' ti 1-1.- • • G / /-L. •-' 7 . - / y 3 s ✓/ r, '1 , s-' "��C v..; r; ��,Ya'- Imo— + �. �/ , •'�\\\.\\,3, 1.` �. •__� Cs �A' / ' �� /1 1--- N' + - j: .i A 1_—.--- ...,:,_.'.....---*---- 3 � •'-? / r, r , r-7 s ▪ \°s j 1��, % \ , s I s W •■y 1 ;.. 1 ,. �s �I .,. I\ �� s [ _sf. —___tv-1—tip` .I,_ /—/— 1 — • �,1. �� c !: '`,+.��*�.° + �._ ,x y_ --1 w _ _-• — . _ \ ! : ...- ‘ 1 :l - 2 .-- ... - 5 . . . :. - . r. UJ I- , ... • t I E. 1 :•%. . i :• -- ' • :1 \ 5 •1 C't■ c't'eek ,r< '--......1 -- -t --....--- • --= ,-- - 11 _-—:-—-—_e__,_, _.__,_,,_. __ 72.......: • .. . •_. nn „ .., , _ , \ _ Z. tv:.•• \V, . ' v. . - ___---------' ,•-.ff, r..'":.• , ,Ts. \ „ 1 . ,.. . . _...- r-- 11 I 1.. . \ _420.- , . ,---- -r —T . — — r - , 7 • 11 , 71, , t. t ..... ----- - t 1 , , ..,. .. ...__„___ li I , ..... .......„ , ______ :„ -. .,_ _. i , ,, i . :.,.., . e ___.- - ,,; ‘ 5-- --. ---,---- _.--,----____. - - - - , 0 , a , = -. . I fa :, ........,- •-t .........4.--- --: ,..--1--- . 1.---- ti, \ _ 1 7• ..: -s. --..-7----- :.:1 II u • . % -:-.....----•--- 71 -:....t.---,-..-- c 1 "F., \ II -.2 ' ' 7, ....--,`".......y.. 7 ,. .. -... t• , = ,, , • ,-, , ---------- \ . ) r . _ . _ ____----- .. .... s.\ , , . _ _ . _ .. .• , ...,,, A , , ■ ■ . - ------■■-• rfthulp eo - s % • , .• , '..1 4, • \ . , ... 3 _ • . --"5`i-----„ \ , , ., /----7- --"*1 \Click:lekilj ., Z. , ,.......... , , \_ - \ 3 , \ s , \ A __.-- c \ \ % \ ,........... \ \ , \ fr IP. \‘ . \ • .fc z 0 i ? .r. III. illl r•%.,1 ig - e . : 1------ - •-I •; 11 ..: i I— = '-'7 r. E Igg,-iit: r, i ' ' * - 1 '. • .-:. • 1 5 11.1 1 .`i. , , III I -..' t/ : •" . • 1. Z .-. < -J ' CL --.....‘.................. 8 - - - Z' :i •_;" 1 5 • . I. ,..r.' t -J 1 0 ---:'.... • 1 ' .. . . i i-- / ..., ....,..._ /' •. h. • 1 :, f e i • ... "-- s > 1 I 0 a i 2 CC • LLJ i:1, 1 . ,,.....■.%-.........4MMIA:11111:*: Artrjer 0 • ., .1 , ....m.........._....7-.1.0togsrif • . .„, .,_,__-.....‘ . z........,,. ......... ./ . ...„ ,......_iNsLArkli. it.,_. . . ,,,...... ...—_,......r...■,..."...1111,16. . , .. je ,----........... , , z 1"'"-". 1111P --.., lir , 11 :,,,:i • — -rp- ii ri, •(////7/j• cc P:7 ‘> Ad// - ir//, 0 0 a; ...../ CD --- '1 ---'---- . //'..- Fo a, " •1 - ( -•- 72 I '•7 _ 1... „ t I '.--71 -.■ i . . 1 ■ t• i , ; i cg Cc t-- 1 -, vilAsityjr.,14 l 14.., vi !- A.---- :-- ' . 'c•-•\ ,...11'410, ,, _ .- -----I-' --------___-_ 7 it,'-`t _..„_. . .....= , . •-\\, . - ............._j Wili 111....0•""1"11 -_,„..-- .: 7.- --- ( . i . . ...___ ____. ; ,,,, i; • ... . •-.. .. I- ir z I 1 ; ,.. ,•- t il , i II i 11 / 211 1" ' ' • ' ' f I II 10 i 1 Ft 11 : . ".& .1_ 7"--\,-\\\, ■••:- -: : -:\\\\'‘... 4..__„....._,__. ....,--- ' ' t ft! fi 2 - ".37? . ' ' i 12 ' 11 110 - I il il i ii ji . „j A., ill • -\ 11 2; '51! 8 r .h fp . .,.., . • .. lit le :-/ li .1 if t; 11 ;11 il 11 il lilt tU. -:- *.• ,.,: „..__ _ - -alatktitralfe \ / .., - _ ,, 7 7: 4"Prolir %A / ' 1 „.•• / - I r — . - . - • . -. , ; - I I ...‘„. - :i . .../ - i • _ .....# , \ /1.\:,_.. ..-,...-:.:::. - ,‘ - i •:,•.•-....•' . , / -_.,.. •,----- •1 r, ‘i....4 r,r, t ,_ -•' ti ■., i . i...1.•::::• - fi. t ,;, '' ii -•!....' ; - ----17,”-1-----.---F-'- ,„ v i , 1 , ii t .,1 s 4 ---:-'::,--t:' 1 i-0 &' ' li - a - : - A ' I • ,t1 / . , =".7.-- I .: '-: ..-- i E -::...-,...-.3-:-.F.7 • : . ; , \ It! .0 4- . ' .4.1,-, -;."`' ,11111: gi • : II: i. • . .-,-.- iiiket \A i It II;' - -.- 1 ',.'\ ' 1.1s --.•- (// . \ , , -.= • ... >4'h• ::', ::::.... a.:;1::i < 5 C%:'„A31 .,,vili i kt —--— < I _ € 0, W ? F .gi d - . W ELa it Q J a J .-I I i ' 1 - H' 8 II z . • . /l j�j!;.W • �' / �' ZZii. r,. r 1tl8 = - i �• . I W m i 4 '�_ J J ..,f�� Q I W W 1 J i .! t. i . a 1 s ec a•,- -- 1 ....4 i IX S o • W Cl o 7 - i. ,, ,‘ / t f_ _ _- --...... - . , ....... ,'•: . 1 .,.,.,.jj. ( ...'.'''''..■,, .' ----1? -' 1111MINO "* 7 ____ / : -" t , ei• 1e I. j j -, . '\ r i _ \ _ J -1/4, . / ..., ' 7 **,..; Maw al / / / N. — ___ , ....p10 ro JS es m ;i \\\\\ .. v __ - /.n - iiI i ;a ir 5. iI Q 1 •I f a ���� ., S g . a ••...- i - - %Immo.. 0 • • —*� r 1 1 Itf� 'N.''' ...-- 8 ... �� . i , . ,, 8 attpai, ''...:P4‘,. _6,40:VIP. r 1•••••4•Ve.- \ 4Pt-44P4lairr. ti' 1%.-AMINO. •IP . .. 1 i 1. / 40.... .114 .e. 4- lip„*cot, ;,...,..1...., ,___._,..4.-,,,, -op • • i ;0: ......- ./14,rogeo,...00,5 „.w., gr. I _1- 17...rit , II -, .., i0 i 4 ;fig-7#49c -as .;;"1-'',' 44174:::----Mli/ 41 A II . \ -mg ii, ‘40---thAblv , / , 41 .------. -ANI„,.._ b ).dollelhi" ,I II ;11-\ I ‘4 VI, ' - 1 iiii;k.1° 1 dilVa - -- mg 3 7 1 '\ 5J' tt _ ow L r.. L f s I �, \ i ,A 1 _ I i II • liel iI �'- "S � n�. „ /,� , mow : , �.► ..., 1 .■ I .,___Vc'--- 4411 Ca16111110- .0°41- it � , ,i 1 I kAhLuipwl; /(,- ,• I' iir - -, ' e ,t ~ f 1 /Ic; . • , i 111 ,\ - -.-.........-___. ../ ' i, ., -„ , ,..i, ...t. -\\,, \ ...,,,,,,,,-: .„ ,,, .,, (ii; , . .--.1 .,...,,,•.\\.\\, \ ,.... ,,.• ' 1 ,r,-, 4; , , . / ,� _ 1 i. • • - a+•..,,► CC; ii: a 1 V....00,1 • • W II • ot 4 § o ` c •• tol • . • \ 'Z cc t / \ ._+ J ; a . ` J ' g. . / '•' Q Q CO fs - � cc ti .iz• L'•r. 1 ---.•.•.•.•..•.. • ... :..u.. I S 1 :'i. �S. �� W•41110 . -.. .. a•. i:..:. :, . '::J::"•:::; :r! :••:•:•:•.•∎ .;::•.k j `• o I.7 7. ,..a TIC� '.,�. `} s :i %. .. ♦. .. y� :' ;,..''• :•:f:• 1 1 Q: .. •j :• : 1::•k:• : '' ''' s {:W : • :.....4:::::'•1.:''''''' ::%•••••::::7•••••••••':•••••••••::::: ;.5;.! i: I.• • :1� h .•CC F J a. •�'1. , : coo• ��:�`� � �� .x i _y cy� �-•�•��' � y� W Q sic .•—�;:--L _t—'— — — \° LU \ , \ s . - ID W j I � '�i Y C .:t• .71 ILI F to Ili • J; i� i;! i � 1 �;�i � ; _1111 1 ' ' ` ,.... i-�; l , . .4111 041:.iii LI �r'1111 iiit:;i111,11t,.3h1i, Lij • ( T2 - - ,7, - — — -:',.'.-. DP-71 ,. - !Iimulil. ((; i Nor'!. 1 1:" .' k 04 B9iC6) .'1 ' i''' 'TO -PAr88" 0 ! iji4 7,71 , ,..-7 Nefi ce:,.' / . I i ; . .,..;; 17-1,58' • 3.?:(s'w : i - . J/ , 1 • TR.2 it , 880.0 . • t ' '11itmii.•'• -• - .•25to I ‘3,0 .06,41111.11i it , • .) 44114-- .1)04 1! . 2. / -;1:.1: ' .1 .1.7.:.: .o'i'.fti,' re:31.,y :-..4.Lr jj-cl, i it.) ;..ii il i\I Ai".)L1‘ - 1. 179. I '' :' / fl j •I(>;''1017-8676.8..1 .;d1P7-161 li71..i)Pfrfil): 1114.1.4" 1 ,/ „. , i :.1 .. ;1'1 -grigetd, 5;'•;; lb.. ' 'i / 4 i irl. i i''..1 %)i›..1"5 ;;■./P-147, ■ , 'J' L.:0 , 1 -" ,„1.04)001. . '.. I 844g ij 2.02 ' ''; '14 " ---- i i 1 l'.i1 • ./14.846 i'4. .5 16 • '` ■ (' if 4 IA — , !ii! 111-1 ' L. .- 1- J I Ir.: J-c ''• 6,1 12e 8 Iti44-.0 ' 'I JP-II ■‘, 1,-9 I I p \,.. .76.5 ' tie. ' ,' . 815.7 Ipi, 830.0 f ir. L .1 , 834.0 ii ,1 , ' 1 1 I i lig . , 1 ,i . i • 1 . ■ . : 'il . ' I , • I' -I;•:-.1 ( 1 , 4:, ' , 41 - iiii I : ' • I!• iVt-1 ■ ' ; . '.'''' ' ' JP- 10 ■/, . '1441 " ,1 i .... i ) 1 i i • .- , , •••'',to , .. -41-iiin ■ -'-; - it, ; ,. 410 /64, ‘, _..r, J-t li.J I/• „ .'", , • u;b ■ tiii 1.-T -"-.: IP ';'‘ 1( 1 f(0:• . : 818.9 !. ■ , - ' •8300 JP-49 (---il AS,';:ii 1 • ; ! • ::. : I. p, 1 1. 818.1 1 s... 11: ,,, I I, ,. •I I ' • 1 p30.0 0 4iyi __,'.....1... ;..... #" is ..1--,110....r,i- — ..i-,I.lr73,1,,,.jep6_93k 9J876P24-;335, •Iiip..: 7' , 8.30.0 , L I j /6.7.2, 4. roiti 00ra \ it i ;* vi • V A 1 - /o ')P ' JP.-111112, :-.1 •'T'TI .' -- : irtte.Q .' '''' .#RICK fr': - 1p ' el 8,50.11 1 AGAN : ', i,: I■,,y1IN Imo" I PARK . _ tA 845.0 si II \ mii '2:•i II A.L.L v , •!( -i • FIGURE No. 17 STORM SEWER LAYOUT MAP 0 CITY OF • EAGA ._._.___ - MINUTES ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION PAGE 1 of 3 FEBRUARY 25, 1992 INDBPBNDHNT SCHOOL DISTRICT 196 Chairman Graves opened the next public hearing of the evening regarding a Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment from D--1 (Single Family) to PF (Public Facilities) , a Rezoning of approximately 15 acres from AG (Agricultural) to PF (Public Facilities) , and a Preliminary Plat consisting of one lot for an elementary school located along the south side of Wescott Road and east of Denmark Avenue in the NE 1/4 of Section 22. City Planner Sturm stated that this application meets all public facilities zoning requirements. He stated that the school district has revised their original site plan to significantly increase the number of trees that will be saved. A neighborhood meeting was held and residents discussed their concern regarding the loss of trees, buffers, and child safety. Rick Linear, a representative of I.S.D. 1196, stated that he was there to answer any (petitions. Rick Eller was concerned about the tree loss. He was also concerned with children walking to and from school through the open area. Dan Fashion felt there was not enough buffer between the school and the single-family homes to the west. He suggested moving the school 100 feet to the east. Rob Colhotz raised his concern that the school would raise the noise pollution in the area. He also questioned what McCarthy Drive would eventually be connected to. City Planner Sturm answered that McCarthy Drive would connect with Denmark Avenue. Mr. Linear stated that moving the school to the south was not feasible because of the Williams Pipeline. Moving the school to the east would also cause a problem because there is a severe slope in that area and it is heavily wooded and would cause the loss of more trees. Mr. Linear felt that there was adequate buffer to the east. Member Markley stated that he did not like to see this beautiful piece of land leveled when there was a flat piece of land with few trees located near Lexington Avenue and Wescott Road that could be used for the school site. timber Griggs also commented that this particular piece of land is very beautiful and encouraged the school distriot to find another piece of land to build the school on. Mr. Linear stated that the school district choose this particular site very carefully. He stated that the potential school site had to meet certain criteria Some of the criteria are: 1) the school had to be located where the children were and the need was greatest; 2) must be a sloped site because the school proposed is a two-story; and 3) should not be located by an intersection. (4 414 mmw PAGE 2 of 3 S Cal Zweifel, a representative of I.S.D. #196, mentioned that the school district needs this fourth elementary school by the fall of 1993. He questioned why the City was just now informing the school district that they did not approve of this site. He further stated that they preferred not to locate on a flat piece of land because it would not be economically advantageous as a sloping piece of land would be. chairman Graves commented that he opposed this site when another suitable piece of land was available. Member Griggs felt that this development would have a major impact on the environment in this area and could not support this application. Member Gorman also stated that he can not approve this application. Griggs moved, Merkley seconded, the motion to deny a Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment from D-1 (Single Family) to PF (Public Facilities) consisting of one lot for an elementary school located along the south side of Wescott Road and east of Denmark Avenue in the NE 1/4 of Section 22. 110 All present voted in favor, except Hunter who opposed. Approved 4-1. Griggs moved, Markley seconded, the motion to deny a Rezoning of approximately 15 acres from AG (Agricultural) to PF (Public Facilities) consisting of one lot for an elementary school located along the south side of Wescott Road and east of Denmark Avenue in • the NE 1/4 of Section 22. All present voted in favor, except Hunter who opposed. Approved 4-1. Griggs moved, Merkley seconded, the motion to deny a Preliminary Plat consisting of one lot for an elementary school located along the south side of Wescott Road and east of Denmark Avenue in the NE 1/4 of Section 22, subject to the following conditions: 1. These standard conditions of plat approval as adopted by Council action on July 10, 1990 shall be complied with: Al, B1, B2, B3, Cl, C2, C3, C4, C5, D1, El, Fl, G1 & Hl S PAGE 3 of 3 • 2. The applicant shall submit a tree protection plan and tree specific preservation revisions to the city prior to Final Plat. 3. The storm sewer that will serve the site shall be extended to Pond JP-11 by this development. 4. A catch basin shall be added to the southeast corner of the parking lot on the upstream side of the future driveway. 5. This development shall be responsible for providing a cash dedication of $14,510 to meet water quality treatment needs. 6. The final utility plan shall include water services to the property to the east of the proposed street to serve the future lots along the east side of the street. 7. The proposed street along the east property line of the site shall be a public street built to City standards. 8. Proposed McCarthy Drive is to be constructed to 36 foot • wide, face of curb to face of curb. 9. Since the proposed 60 foot wide right-of-way is insufficient to accommodate the proposed sidewalk along McCarthy Drive, the development is required to construct the proposed sidewalk on school property. All present voted in favor. The reasons for denial are as follows: 1. Concern for the safety of children walking to and from school through the open areas. 2. The loss of trees. 3. Not compatible to the physical characteristics of the area. 4. Aesthetics. Iq • MEMORANDUM • TO: TOM HEDGES, CITY ADMINISTRATOR DALE RUNKLE, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR FROM: JIM STURM, CITY PLANNER DATE: FEBRUARY 27, 1992 RE: ELEMENTARY SCHOOL #17 At the February 25 Advisory Planning Commission meeting, the Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment from D-1 to Single Family and the Rezoning of 15 acres from Agricultural to Public Facilities for Ind. Sch. Dist. 196, Elementary School #17, were denied 4/1. The Preliminary Plat was denied unanimously. The location is along the south side of Wescott Road, just east of Denmark Avenue. There were six to ten residents in attendance, some from the Westbury Addition to the east. They were not included in the 350' notice area and as a result, they were not notified at a neighborhood meeting held on February 20. The major concern expressed by the residents and the Commission is the amount of tree loss and grading necessary for the proposed use. The two-story, 80,000 sq. ft. building would be very • similar to the Pinewood Elementary School by the Autumn Ridge Addition. Calvin Zweifel stated that the school district needs this elementary school by the fall of 1993. The district has begun condemnation proceedings on this property, although they are still trying to negotiate a transaction. If you would like additional information on this item, please contact me. 1 City Planner JS/js 1 MINUTES OF:A''SPECIAL MEETING OF THE EAGAN CITY COUNCIL'' • • any Minneso1l :::::> Noaer t;26 1:991 A special City Council meeting was held on Tuesday,November 26, 1991,in the lunchroom of the Eagan Municipal Building at 5:00 p.m.for the purpose of reviewing the proposed 1992 general fund and public enterprise fund budgets. Present.:Were..Mayor Egan and City Councilmembers Gustafson, McCrea, Pawlenty and Wachter. Also preyalitt:were;O3reot 3 :;o;:Finance VanOverbeke, Director of Public Works Colbert, Director of Parks and Recreation Vraa;::Director::if Community Development Runkle, Fire Chief Southorn, Police Captain Aszmann, Assistarit`to the:tity Administrator Hohenstein and City Administrator Hedges. GENERAL FUND AND PUBUC ENTERPR1:SE:fUNR:OPERATING BUDGETS/PROPOSED 1992 City Administrator Hedges reviewed a timeline for adoption of the 1992 operating budget stating that a truth in taxation public hearing is set for December 3 with a contingency date if the budget is continued to December 17 of which both dates are scheduled for regular City Council meetings. He reviewed information the staff has compiled for the truth in taxation hearing that will be available as a handout and further responded to question :City Councilmember Pawlenty raised about data that appeared in a publication prepared by the Minnesota Association. Director of Finance.VanOverbeke presented an analysis of the data that was printed litan article.entitled,"Understanding Your Property Taxes 1991,"written by the Minnesota Taxpayers Association acid:stated that there are many discrepancies in how funds are reported stating that the per capita expenditures::are;:skewed and cable tv franchise, HRA and recycling proceeds, as an example, are listed irr: ne:communiti as general government and excluded in a comparable community. City Administrator Hedges reviewed a memo,attachments and the detailed budgets for both the general fund and public enterprise fund stating that any changes in this document are revised per direction of the City Council from the October 22 meeting. After a brief discussion on the handouts prepared for the truth-in-taxation/1992 general fund and public enterprise fund budgets hearing, the City Administrator was directed to prepare the::fi.. :budget:xiocpranent:as presented. 1992-1996 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS BUDGET City Administrator Hedges presented:the f14:::(5) year capital improvements program proposed for 1992 through 1996 stating that the budget is Rr rented in three (3) parts. Following a presentation of Part I, Public Facilities,the City Administrator was:directed to reallocate$500,000 in capital expense under community investment for parkland in 1994 to 1992 for the ice arena facility and outdoor swimming pool project. There was also consensus by the City Council to designate$850,000 the City has received for restructuring the 1980 single family mortgage bonds for the ice arena and outdoor swimming pool capital project. City Councilmembers also requested that:;he municipal site preparation be separated from the ice arena facility and outdoor swimming pool project 8ga community investment fund expenditure in the amount of $500,000 due to the fact that allocation will actually prepare the entire local government complex site for the eventual expansion of law enf ei*1i/.#101;ipal center building,the ice arena/outdoor swimming pool project and any future capit8itiie'fdinig.projectattiat might occur. Mayor Egan summarized the revisions to the capital improvements program by stating:tbat these revisions call for $1,350,000 to finance the ice arena/outdoor swimming pool project with thi ::remaining balance to be financed through the sale of general obligation bonds and corporate donations ''He further directed the City Administrator to prepare changes to the CIP as directed by the City Council and prepare a revised budget at the next City Council work session. Page 2/EAGAN SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL:MINUTEE''"'' j November 26, 1991 .• DEVELOPMENT FEE STUDY Director of Community Development Runkle presented a study that was undertaken by his department at the direction of the City Council to compare development related fees in various cities in the metro area. He stated that sixteen (16) cities were evaluated on the basis of two separate scenarios-one residential and one commercial. Director of Community Development Runkle presented the study which outlined individual and cumulative costs for siir.00 dl: ct :#1.0 s :graphs and computations for water quality as prepared by the City's Water Resources{ t lhator:`:City�'Cou cilmembers expressed concern that the City of Eagan maintain a competitiveness with other developing:communities and gave direction to the City Administrator and Director of Finance to provide some additional..analysis of development fees presented by Community Development. PROPOSED ICE •:..••%OUTD:OR SWIMMING POOL City Administrator Hedges stated that at a special City Council meeting during July, 1991, scope and funding for the ice arena/outdoor swimming pool project was given consideration. A determination was made by the City Council that there would not be any further consideration of a bond referendum until after the school levy referendums were held on November 5, 1991. He stated that all three (3) districts had successful bond levies and:presented a number of issues for City Council consideration if the City is to proceed with the ice arena/outdt or.swim ming pool project. The issues that were presented included selection of architect/engineer, confirmation of:site location, financing alternatives, fundraising, involvement of the Recreation Facilities Advisory Committee,::community information, adoption of a CIP, timetable, tour of facilities and ultimately, a referenduri?:question. City Councilmembers discussed the various issues confirming the municipal center:iite,:as:a location for a future ice arena/outdoor swimming pool and further that staff should give consideratioon to an RFP process during December for the purpose of proceeding ahead with the ice arena/outdoor swimming pool project. City Councilmember Gustafson stated that additional consideration should be given to an additional allocation of community investment dollars for the project. City Councilmembers also expressed a desire to continue review of the CIP to provide direction to the community on the scheduling of public improvements over the next five (5) years. EXECUTIVE SESSION: The City Council adjourned into exeOtive sesSIri for the purpose of discussing collective bargaining proposals for the LELS,representing police:officers,and:the Teamsters,representing dispatchers. ADJOURNMENT The meeting was adjourned at 8:45 p.m. TLH Date City Clerk • MINUTES Of !REGULAR MEE*ING OF THE EAGAN,CITY COUNci. A regular meeting of the Eagan City Council*vas held on Tuesday,February 18, 1992, at the Eagan Municipal Center. Present were Mayor Egan and Councilmembers Wachter,Awada,McCrea,and Pawlenty. Also present were City Administrator Hedges, Community Development Director Dale Runkle, Director of Public Works Tom Colbert,and City Attorney James Sheldon. City Administrator Hedges noted for the audience that al brief Executive Session of the City Council would be held at the end of the regular meeting. Pawlenty moved,Wachter seconded,:$iiiotion to approv'the agenda for the February 18,1992,regular City Council meeting as amended. Aye: 5 Nay: 0 ........................... Awada moved, Pawlenty seconded,.$motion to approve the minutes for the February 4, 1992,regular City Council meeting as presented. Aye: ro .1 1ESS ELECTRONIC INTERIOR PROPOSAL•W"CONSULTING&DESIGN Pawlenty moved, McCrea seconded :a:mOtion to approve the proposal by Electronic Interiors to act as electronic media consultants and designers for the upgrade of audio and visual systems in the City Council chambers in the amount of$5,760 plus reimburseable expenses not to exceed$50. Aye: 5 Nay: 0 OWNERSHIP OF NORTH CENTRAL CABLE COMPANY At the request of staff,the City Council:ai thoriti ed`a:nominal review of municipal ownership options regarding North Central Cable Communications.Corporatioit•ai d.the investigation of any benefits to the City of such ownership. PROPERTY AT 4550 THOMAS:LAKE ROAD After brief introductions by Mayor Egan and City Administrator Hedges, Director of Community Development Runkle said a request had been received from the owner of 4550 Thomas Lake Road for the continued use of his property as a single family,residential hobby farm and,specifically,to allow the keeping of a horse or horses for recreational use. The property is zoned R-1,and the City Code allows the keeping of horses only on agriculturally zoned property of five acres or more*::Mr.Runkle said that because the request is not a variance to any performance standards nor is it listad::#n the City Code as a permitted use or a conditional use in an R-1 zoning district,.he.:acgperti::OWne.>:James Barker, has requested an interim use agreement to be in effect until subdivision ottl a:land:oe urS:::::::::::: City Attorney Sheldon said that State legislative law praiildes for interim uses of property. He said it is handled the same as a rezoning with review by the Advisory:Planning Commission before going to the City • Council. Provisions allow for such interim use until a specified date or event. 1 :•:•::•::•:•::•:• :::::::::: •:• :::::::::::: •:•:• • Page 2/EAGAN CITY COUNCIL MINUTES February 18, 1992 .•.•.•... •:•:•:•:. •:•:::•. The applicant, Mr. Barker, said he Would prefer that the City Council approve an agreement permitting this use and that it be recorded Wiiii...41*•:c.OPP•Ptp.::.*:iaid that if he decides to sell the property, he would like to list it as a "hobby farm" whicii:***PaAnitted by the agreement until the property is • subdivided. After additional discussion, McCrea moved, Wachter seconded, a motion to direct the Advisory Planning Commission to hold a public hearing regarding property at 4550 Thomas Lake Road under the interim use permit process. Aye: 5 Nay: •...•.•.. ..•.•.•.. A. Reschedule First Regular City Cnuncil:Miking.in.MarCh to Monday. March 2. 1992 It was recommended that the first regular City Council meeting in march be rescheduled to March 2, 1992. • B. Personnel Items . . Item 1. Police Dispatcher collective..:Bargaining Agreement—It was recommended that the bargaining agreement with the dispatcher unit for the 190:0.a:0000 per the City Council's offer of February 4, 1992, with the adidtion of the use of compensatory time for funeral purposes. Item 2. Temporary Park Planning Technician-74waS:ra0Oinmended that the hiring of William Bradley as a temporary park planning technician be C. Plumbers Licenses It was recommended that the plumbers licenses be approved as presented in Exhibit A. D. Classification of Tax Forfeit Property.as Non-Conservation :::::.:::.:.: • :•:•::•:: • It was recommended that parcel 10149924C-Offieippitived as non-conservation land. E. Application to Office of Waste Mana2emenfitor'VVattiEducation Information Project Grant ....• •.•.• It was recommended that the City's application to the Office of Waste Management for the Waste Education Information Project Grant be approved as presented. F. Proclamation.Volunteers of America Week. March 1 -8. 1992 It was recommended that a proclamation designating hiarCh 1 -8, 1992, as Volunteers of American Week be approved. G. Proclamation. Support Your CIMPiii.ai.00:.4.40,-.0Feeek.March 8 - 14. 1992 . „ . It was recommended that a proclamation designating MarCh 8 -14,1992,as Support Your Chamber •.••.•.• of Commerce Week be approved. Page 3/EAGAN CITY COUNCIL February 18, 1992 H. Project 607. Receive Report/Order, ' blic Hearinr, .•flifflev Road - Reconstruction) It was recommended that the feasibility':**i' 1#0::Project 607 (E.DiMey Road - Reconstruction) be received and the public hearing scheduled for Mafiii:I!1 :1:99i I. Contract 91-11. Receive Bids/Award Contract(Well #16 - Pump and Well House) It was recommended that the bids fur.Contract 91-11 (Well#16 - Pump&Well House) be received, the contract awarded to the lowest responsible:biddei :and tl e:Mi r and City Clerk authorized to execute all related documents. J. Project 596R. Receive Final Assessment Raji/Order Public Hearing (Woodlands North Addition) It was recommended that the final:assessment rol be.:*;eived for Project 596R (Woodlands North Addition - Streets & Utilities) and a public healing scheduled to be held March 17, 1992. K. Contract 92-03.Approve Plans/Authorize Advertisement for Bids (South Well Field Conversion) It was recommended that the plans and specifications for Contract 92-03 (South Well Field Conversion) be approved and the advertisement for a bid opening authorized to be held at 11:30 a.m. on Friday, March 13, 1992. L. Project 628. Receive Feasibility Repgrt/Ordet::Pirblic Hearing (Autumn Ridge 2nd Addition - Streets, Utilities & Ponds) It was recommended that the feasibility:report for Project 628 (Autumn Ridge 2nd Addition -Streets, Utilities & Ponds) be received and a public: ring scheduled to be held March 17, 1992. Special Note: At the end of the meeting,this action was rescinded and the public hearing rescheduled for April 21, 1992. M. Vacate Utility & Ponding Eaaements,:.fieceive:•Petition/Order Public Hearing (Lot 1. Block 1, Dakota County Plat I • It was recommended that the petition to vac!**e drainage;:utility and ponding easements for Lot 1, Block 1, Dakota County Plat I be received and a pubile;ihearing:scheduled for March 17, 1992. McCrea moved,Wachter seconded, a motion to approve the Consent Agenda as presented. Aye: 5 Nay: 0 Mayor Egan introduced this item as a tobacco ordih ce amendment and consideration of the appointment of a Youth Issue Task Force. City Administrator Hedges said this item is a result of City Council direction regarding issues related to the sal*of tol*ii.:4d#oba ro products and the appointment of a task force to study various youth related issues:: itii3steatrve ttSSfs€ant Liz Witt provided a brief explanation of the item and was available to answer questions. There was general support for the tobacco ordinance amendment; however, a number of questions arose regarding the task force and its charge. While the Council agreed that the issues proposed to be addressed are very worthwhile,there were concerns about the practical aspects of what can actually be done. • • Page 4/EAGAN CITY COUNCIL February 18, 1992 Councilmember McCrea recommended before:going ahead, that.It.:be determined what was to be studied,for what purpose, and for how long. She suggested a continuance.during which time staff would research appropriate topics,what could be done and whit Is Rot.already being addressed by another entity. Chief of Police Geagan said that in September he would'iiii:* p :'a County-level committee meeting dealing with youth and said perhaps staff would have a better idea of a direction for the task force at that time. Pawlenty moved,Wachter seconded, a motion to approve an ordinance amending Eagan City Code Chapter 6 regarding tobacco and the sale of tobacco products as presented. Aye: 5 Nay: 0 Pawlenty moved,Wachter seconded,a motionito:contini a consideration of a Youth Issue Task Force for six months with direction to staff to report as ta:ttie need after review and analysis of the City's role in youth issues. Aye: 5 Nay: 0 CONDITIONAJ. USE:PWRI 'I1 DISPOSAL Mayor Egan introduced this item as a conditional use permit for Nitti Disposal,Inc.,to allow outdoor storage in an LI (Light Industrial District) on Lot 8,Block 1,Sibley Terminal Industrial Park located west of Highway 13, north of Yankee Doodle Road in the SE 1/4 of Section 8. McCrea moved,Awada seconded, a motion to continue to the March 17, 1992, regular City Council meeting,consideration of a conditional use:per*It for Nitti Disposal to allow outdoor storage in a LI (Light Industrial) district. Aye: 5 Nay: 0 • • VARIANCE/NORDQUIST SIGt!i:.COMPANY Mayor Egan introduced this item as:a::variance'for Nordquist Sign Company of 23'to the 27' pylon sign maximum height, located north of Cli#X:ttoa and West of Nicols Road. Mayor Egan said at issue was the question of precedent in allowing a pylon sign on property that does not abut the freeway. Director of Community Development Runkle said the ordinance allows the height of a pylon sign to exceed the maximum when the property abuts a limited access highway. Mr. Runkle reiterated that this is the first time consideration has:.been:.givea.:to.:a:height.variance that does not meet that criteria. Fred Reynolds of McDonald's Corporation.reminded.the Council that the owner purchased this particular piece of property because no curb cuts were?to be permitted on property closer to the intersection of Nicols and Cliff Roads. With the turnback of Nicols::Road fro i tlhe County to the City,a curb cut has since been permitted. Kay Butler, the owner, said her rest*urant htis:very low visibility from Highway 77 and because fast-food is often an impulse purchase,the pylon sign vi irtld increase business. • Hearing no case for a hardship and because of concerns regarding precedent,McCrea moved,Wachter seconded, a motion to deny a variance of 23' to the 27'pylon sign requirement for Nordquist Sign Company for the McDonald's property at 4565 Erin Lane as presented. Aye; 5 Nay: 0 • AMEND CONDITION OF PLAT/AVIUMN:MIDGE 2ND ADDITION Mayor Egan introduced this item a5:a requesifrotl iAtituufn Ridge 2nd Addition/James Development Company,to change a condition of plat approval to add 20 additional lots,located east of Dodd Road,south of Dimey Road in the NE 1/4 of Section 25. City Administrator Hedges said this item had been continued from the February 4,1992,meeting to address the question of a second access to this development. Director of Community Development Runkle said • • Page 5/EAGAN CITY COUNCIL February 18, 1992 a number of alternatives had been explored;Ii jiWever,the issue.40:yet to be resolved because the surrounding properties are not far enough in the planning.ifii s..to make.sucii:X:determination. He noted that even without a secondary access, the development will not genes a iauighi:rips per day to exceed existing street design standards. Dale Hanson of 636 Hackmore Drive and Homer Laird of 628 Hackmore Drive,spoke of their safety concerns especially as they relate to the heavy traffic near the elementary school. Director of Public Works Colbert said that studies indicate that the..area:::is:.$So:adegFately signed for traffic control. Mr. Laird suggested a four-way stop be installed at the; t ance:td:the:sch oola nd Hawthorne Woods or at Crimson Leaf Trail and Hackmore. After further discussion,Wachter moved,Ega i;seconded;:A:motion to approve the request by James Development Company for Autumn Ridge 2nd.Addition:to change::a condition of plat approval to additional lots located east of Dodd Road,south of Diff it,K::Kiatt in t g$E:L/4 of Section 25. Aye: 4 Nay: 1 (Pawlenty) M $?r ! ss COMPREHENSIVE GUIDE PLAN AMENDMENT/REZONING PRELIMINARY PLAT/WEXFORD ADDITION Mayor Egan introduced this item:::;:.*::comprehensive guide plan amendment for Wexford Addition/Dan Dolan Development, changing the D-III and D-II (Mixed Residential) to D-I (Single Family),a rezoning of approximately 36 ages from'a planning development district to an R-1 (Single Family) District and a preliminary plat consisting of 65 lots:Located along the south side of Diffley Road,west of Thomas Lake Road in the north half of Section 28 :::City�:Adiiiinistrator Hedges said that a public hearing had been held before the Advisory Planning::Cipnrii ission and they had recommended approval. Director of Community Development Runkle then provided the location and a brief overview of the project. After a brief statement by Mr. Dolan, Mayor Egan then questioned the project's use of a cul de sac far in excess of City standards. Director of Community Development Runkle said the issue had been reviewed; however,an access to the west was determined not to be compatible with the single family use and an access to the north would serve no viable purpose.:due.to:tts.:proxiimity:.to:;he Thomas Lake Road access onto County Road 30. Jim Johnston of Dolan Developmeiittheriasked:ti+ir:Cowucil to address a condition of plat approval which stated that the developer was to be responsible:for bringing.;sanitary sewer service to the property. He • noted that in 1979 the owners of Eagan 40 had agreed to a relocation of Thomas Lake Road which resulted in 2 1/2 acres of right of way for Thomas Lake Road tieing donated to the City as well as,the acceptance and payment of assessments for both sides of the realignedroadway.:: .Johnston also noted that the developers had previously paid substantial lateral and trunk sewer assessments to the City and for these reasons plus the downzoning were asking that the City bring the sewer service to the property line. Mayor Egan said he did not wish to add excessive costs to the project;however,was reluctant for the City to absorb $8700 without sufficient justification. Councilmember Pawlenty said a point of distinction in doing so was largely because of the type of land use as well as the:change to the type of development the City was trying to encourage. In answer to a question.from Mayor'Egan, City Attorney Sheldon said the City Council had the authority to bring services: 4.4.4ro0.4 i;and then determine who would pay for those services. As to setting a precedent, the be noted that the Council's action was taken for specific reasons and policy such as the downzoning the;property,the donation of substantial right of way with the realignment of Thomas Lake Road and the substantial assessments already paid to the City, some at the higher zoning rate. • ........... Page 6/EAGAN CITY COUNCIL MINUTES:: :' '•'•'•'''•''''''''' February 18, 1992 Dick Marhula of EHW Properties':•sahi he represented.;te property directly west of the Wexford Addition. He said their property presently ha g: p:R$..(Rpad*:./iusiness)zoning which is a,high commercial use next an R-1 zoning. Mr. Marhula did not:Iii0B ve;:;. e::zonings were compatible without some type of transitional zoning or a significant buffer between them. He was very concerned that the Council's reaction would be less than favorable when commercial plans are brought in for their property. Councilmember McCrea said EHW Properties would be entitled to the zoning of the property if they meet all other ordinance requirements. Mr. Dolan assured the Council that the issue had been discussed and they would bring in extensive landscaping as well as berming After further discussion,Wachter moved,McCrea seconded,a motion to approve the comprehensive guide plan amendment for the Wexford Addition/Dan.Dolan Development,changing the land use from D-III and D-II to D•I. Aye: 5 Nay 0 Wachter moved,McCrea seconded,::ii:•emtioii to itpptoVe the rezoning of approximately 36 acres from an R-4 planned development district to an R-1 (single family) district. Aye: 5 Nay 0 Wachter moved, McCrea seconded, a motion to approve the preliminary plat consisting of 65 lots located along the southside of DiMey Road,west of Thomas Lake Road in the N 1/2 of Section 28 as presented and subject to all of the following conditions.except Condition 8: 1. These standard conditions.of:plat;apiproval.as adopted by Council action on July 19, 1990, shall be complied with • Al, B1, B2, B3, B4, Cl,C2, C3,CS, Dl, E ;,::F ;::fsl; H1 • 2. Boulevard trees shall be aiieW dsseven feet from the back of the curb. 3. Landscaped islands shall be irrigated and maintained by the established homeowners' association. Plans shall be reviewed with the final plat submission. 4. Lots 19 and 20 shall have,a.shared driveway.access from Thomas Lake Road. 5. An outlet for Pond BP-53;wli cii fs located ti thercenter of the site,shall be provided. 6. The final grading plan shall provide a minimum:.of 3.8 acres feet of pond storage volume in Pond BP-53. 7. The final grading plan shall provide a water quality treatment pond with a wet storage volume of 3.2 acre-feet,a surface area at the normal water level of 0.72 acres and a mean depth of 4.4 feet. 8. . • . . .. _. . . . . .. _ 9. The applicant shall obtain:friitfAi:Otf!:i rar'1a a to allow a cul de sac in excess of'500 feet. 10. A copy of the shared driveway easement for Lot i and 20 shall be submitted to the City and a turnaround shall be provided for this shared:dciveway. 11. The homeowners association shall be responsible for maintaining the landscaping of the islands in the cul de sacs. • Page 7/EAGAN CITY COUNCIL February 18, 1992 12. Snow fencing shall be instal ed a round.the oa:'frees located near the pond to ensure tree preservation during grading and t i clitin ' 13. Future homeowners shall be made aware of the Williams Bros. Pipline easement. Aye: 5 Nay: 0 REZONING/PRELIMINARY PLAT/HAWTHORSE WOODS ADDITION Mayor Egan introduced this item as a rezonof Hawtbe Woods Addition/Lyman Development, of approximately 51 acres from AG (Agricultural)::ti:$4::.(Sfngle•Family) district and a preliminary plat consisting of 97 lots located east of Dodd Roa ;:south o[::Dlfiey Road in the NE 1/4 of Section 25. City Administrator Hedges said that a public hearing had been held before the Advisory Planning Commission and the APC was recommending approval. Director of Community Development Runkle described the application and its location. Mike Gair of McCombs,Frank&Roos,then presented an overview of the project. Mr.Gair then went on to express the developer's concerns regardittgCondition 13 of the preliminary plat which would not permit construction of Phase II without a secondary'access:o:service the area Mr.Gair said he and Steve Ryan had videotaped the entrance to the elementary school,at Hackmore:Drive and reported on the number of vehicles they encountered at peak times during the morning. He sald:the.:amount of traffic did not appear to justify holding up further development of the project until.a.second:acess to the project was provided. Mr. Brian King, 616 Hackmore Dri re;;rett hated earlier concerns about further development in this area with only one access point. He noted.that traffic reviews done by the developer did not include all the homes that are planned and not yet built in this area. Council concurred that no further development would be allowed without the second access. - Dale Hanson,636 Hackmore Drive,expressed,safety concerns and then noted for the Council that no park is included with the Hawthorne Woods Woolf*:.rieiiki.taif.W.***0 children from the development will cross Hackmore to reach the playground at the se toot'ftias addIn to a unsafe conditions. It was noted that the development is subject to all cash parks dedication Rea • Discussion then turned to the alignment and:: tension;:of.Hawthorne Woods Drive north to Diflley Road. Because this alignment has not been worked'out with aif jacent property owners, Director of Public Works Colbert suggested that Project 628 (Autumn Ridge 2nd Addition - Streets, Utilities, and Ponds) be postponed until this alignment can be clarified. He recommended that the March 17 public hearing for the project be postposted to April 21. While Mr.Gair said the road and utility alignment would not be significant to the developer,Mr.Colbert said it would affect adjacent property owners and the accompanying assessment roll. After further discussion, Mayor Fgao..moved,;.Pawlenq.seconded, a motion to reconsider Consent Agenda Item L, Project 628, Receive Feasiliil : r.4#* er Public Hearing(Autumn Ridge 2nd Addition- Streets, Utilities & Ponds). Aye: 5 Nay: b Pawlenty moved,McCrea seconded,a motion to receive th :feasibility report for Project 628 (Autumn • Ridge 2nd Addition - Streets,Utilities, & Ponds) and schedule a public hearing to be held on April 21, 1992. Aye: 5 Nay: 0 Page 8/EAGAN CITY COUNCIL February 18, 1992 Pawlenty moved, McCrea seconded,'a l ofion,to..approve the rezoning for the Hawthorne Woods Addition/Lyman Development of approximately 3tacresfom AG(Agricultural)to R-1(Single-Family)district. Aye: 5 Nay: 0 Pawlenty moved, Wachter seconded, a motion to approve a preliminary plat consisting of 97 lots located east of Dodd Road, south of Diffley Road in the NE 1/4 of Section 25 subject to the following conditions with particular attention to Condit j4::j3..i. :notes:.tbat construction of Phase II shall not occur until a secondary access is available'to service tie:aiii 1. These standard conditions of plat approval as:: opted by Council action on July 10, 1990, shall be complied with Al, Bl, B2, B3, B4, Cl, C2, C3, C5, Dl,El, Fi, Gl, Hi 2. A tree protection plan shall be provided and approved prior to issuance of grading permits. 3. Boulevard trees will be allowed 7'from the back of the curb. 4. The Hawthorne Woods storm:sewer system shall be designed to handle the runoff from the 10.2 acres of the Autumn Ridge developttment::to:the south. 5. This development shall dedicate;::provide''o'r financially guarantee the acquisition costs of street right of way as requid:tii provide a secondary street access beyond the boundaries of • this plat. 6. The final grading and drainage plan shall include catch basins in the backyard areas when the surface water runoff duringa 5 year rainfall event exceeds 4 cfs. 7. The developer will design:at d:cofstruc :a::01 acre pond at the NWL with 0.15 feet of wet storage volume along the with effective erosion control measures throughout construction. 8. The utility plan shall include an 8"wgtrmain looping through the site from Hackmore Drive to the Autumn Ridge connection in the'southeast:corner of the site. 9. This development shall be responsible for connecting to the existing 8"sanitary sewer and 8" watermain in Hackmore Drive,extending services to Lots 1,2,and 3,and repairing Hackmore Drive to its original condition. 10. This development shall be responsible for stubtt[tig sanitary sewer and water service to the abutting properties to the..tast•p(44;H44wth roe:Woods development. 11. This development shall dedicate 60"of right of way along the streets in this plat where the proposed 6'concrete sidewalk shall be construd. 12. This applicant shall obtain from the city a variance to allow a cul de sac in excess of 500 feet. • Page 9/EAGAN CITY COUNCIL February 18, 1992 13. Final plats, beginning with: se II (consisting of 42 lots) shall not occur until secondary access is available to •Director of Public Works Colbert noted the right.ot'way change from 65'to 60'. Aye: 5 Nay: 0 PRELIMINARY USE PERMIT TOWN C :144)1 f11 ADDITION Mayor Egan introduced this item as a preliminary plat'Inc Town Centre 100 10th Addition/Rovick Realty, consisting of one lot on approximately 1.6.L B::(Ldmited:nsiness) Acres within the Eagan Heights Commercial Park Planned Development and:a:Cond1ttopal.Use:permit to allow a drive-through facility for a bank located along the south side of Yankee.:Uiiodie.Road :iv!est:tif Yankee Place in the NE 1/4 of Section 15. City Administrator Hedges said a public hearing had been held before the Advisory Planning Commission and they had recommended approval. Director of Community Development Runkle then reviewed the application. Greg Mason of Rovick Realty said that Dakota County had now required an additional 15' of right of way along Yankee Doodle Road to accommodate the county standard 75'half right of way on a limited access county road. Because of the additional riglit: way, Mr. Mason asked that the City grant a variance to the number of required parking stalls from 72 to:69:.:Diiector..of Community Development Runkle said that the loss of three parking stalls would not present a problem and it would allow the building to line up with others on adjacent sites. • After further discussion,Awada moved,:McCt seconded,a motion to approve a preliminary plat for Town Centre 100 10th Addition/Rovick Reai4s:4onsisting of one lot on approximately 1.6 LB (Limited Business)acres within the Eagan Heights Commercial Park Planned Development and subject to the following conditions: 1. These standard conditions of plat approval as adopted by Council action on July 10, 1990, shall be complied with: Al, Bi, B3, C2, C4,El, 2. Trash and recycling containers shall::be located::.Inside, or attached to the building in an enclosure constructed of similar materials as ttie:main building. 3. The building shall be constructed of brick on all four sides. 4. Rooftop mechanical equipment shall not be visible from the street. 5. The southern parking area shall be signed "Ein4ilgyee Parking." 6. Drive-through egress sha4:be. ."Eadt•Cbul •.•.at Yankee Place. 7. Berming shall be provided on.all•sareet sides. 8. All landscaped and bermed areas shall be irrigsittd. 9. All signage shall be subject to the one-time sign fee of$2.50/sq.ft. Page 10/EAGAN CITY COUNCIL February 18, 1992 10. Catch basins shall be constructed in the lot to intercept the surface water runoff from PAR$:• .. this site prior to overland di cha#ge:p.4to•.t#w:s reet. 11. The alignment of the southwest driveway opening from this site shall match the alignment of the existing driveway on the south side of Town Centre Drive. 12. The southeast driveway opening from this site to Town Centre Drive shall be deleted. 13. A variance to City design star ari as omitted permitting 69 rather than 72 parking stalls. 14. A variance to City setbacks along.*an ee Road allowing alignment with adjacent• buildings will be Aye: 5 Nay: 0 Egan moved,Wachter seconded,a motion to approve a conditional use permit to allow a drive-through facility for a bank located along the southside of Yankee Doodle Road,west of Yankee Place in the NE 1/4 of Section 15 as presented. Aye: 5 Nay: 0 .. • LANDSCAPING AND COUNTY ROAD.RIGHT OF WAY Pawlenty moved,Wachter seconded a motiot ta.sapprove a resolution regarding landscaping in County Road rights of way as presented. Aye: 5 RECONSIDERATION/FEBRUARY 4,1992,CitTY COUNCIL MINUTES City Administrator Hedges said that the City Council had briefly reconvened after Executive Session at the February 4,1992,regular City Council meeting and.that action was not reflected in the minutes approved at the beginning of the meeting. It was his fommendation::tt::the City Council reconsider their approval and then add appropriate language to be incii'tited. minutes. McCrea moved, Pawlenty seconded,a motion ato::reconsider approval of the February 4,1992,regular City Council minutes. Aye: 5 Nay: 0 McCrea moved,Wachter seconded,a motion to correct the minutes of the February 4, 1992, regular City Council meeting as follows: EXECUT7VE SESSION The City Council adjourned the regular meeting to an execui :session to consider attorney/client privileged information at 11:35 p.m. Those in attendance•w aria:# x.Figa ,:Eouncilmembers Awada,McCrea,Pawlenty and Wachter, City Administrator Hedges, and City.Aflame.:$he'14 't : The executive session was adjourned at approximately 12:00 a.m. Page 11/EAGAN CITY COUNCIL MINUTkS February 18, 1992 "••••••••••*::::: ::::::: •:•:•:•:. RABIN R901)ASSESSMENT4pPEAL ..::•:•:•:::: Mayor Egan reconvened the meeting to C6i.i.***re.c#ItiiiiiiSidation by the City Attorney to not proceed with any further appeal of the Rahn Road assessments iefiliatiiiii•Project 584. McCrea moved Awada seconde4 a motion not to proceed further with the Rahn Road assessment appeal. Aye: 5 Nay: 0 ........•.•.•.•.•...... . ••••.• ::::::::: :::::•:.: The meeting was adjourned at 12:15 a.m. :::::•:** ••••••••..... ..• • •..• .• Aye: 5 Nay: 0 .•.•.•.•.•....... :::::•:•:•:•:•••• • CHECKLIST Wachter moved, Egan seconded, a motion to approve the checklist dated January 31, 1992, in the amount of $4,711,946.45 and the checklist dated February 17, 1992, in the amount of$183,612.83 and the checklist dated February 18, 1992, in the amount of$377,146.65. Aye: 5 Nay: 0 EXECUTIVE SESSION/ADJouRNMENT ............:.•.•..•.•.•.. • • The City Council adjourned the regular meeting..to:::4::executive session to consider privleged client/attorney information at 950 p.m. Those*:::gtOrdrraiii:iiiire Mayor Egan, Councilmembers Awada, McCrea, Pawlenty and Wachter, and City Admhusfrator Hedges. The executive session was adjourned at approximately 10:15 p.m. :•:•:•:::.:••••• KF CITY OF EAGAN E .3......................••.••.•.••.•.•.•.•... ... .:..:...... .. „;• • City Clerk • .-:•:•:- :::::::: •:•:•:.: ••••.• .•.•.•.• ,:.:.::::::.:.::::::•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:••••:.:.:.:.:.:.'.: EXHIBIT A PLUMBERS FOR APPROVAL FEBRUARY 18, 1992 1. ADVANCED PLUMBING & HEATING 2. DC MECHANICAL 3 . McGUIRE & SONS PLUMBING & HEATING 4 . METROPOLITAN MECHANICAL CONTRACTOR INC. 5. MICKELSON PLUMBING INC. 6. JIM MURR PLUMBING INC. 7 . BRUCE NELSON PLUMBING & HEATING 8 . NEWMECH COMPANIES, INC. 9. NORTHLAND MECHANICAL CONTRACTORS 10. NOVA-FROST, INC. 11. RTP PLUMBING 12 . RICHIES PLUMBING & SEWER SERVICE, INC. 13 . DON WELD PLUMBING MINUTES Ot:kiS.POWitlitiP OF THE WAN CITY COUNC Oigan, Ninnesot *44;7. 14, 440: A special City Council meeting was held on Tuesday, January 14, 1992, in Conference Rooms A and B of the Eagan Municipal Building, beginning at 5:00 p.m. for the purpose of meeting and interviewing Eagan residents seeking an appointment to an advisory commi*p..411/...cOmAxite. Present were Mayor Egan and City Councilmembers Awada, McCraZP*4044.i!iCOachter. Also present was City Administrator Hedges. COMMISSION INTERVIENS •:•••••••:-:•:••• :::•• Twenty (20) Eagan residOntt were'itiien individual interviews lasting approximately ten (10) minutes with the City Council to answer questions and state reasons why they are seeking an appointment to an advisory commission of the City Council. Following each interview, Mayor Egan thanked the applicant for his or her interest in serving as a volunteer and, further, that actual appointments would be made at the regular City Council meeting to be held on Tuesday, January 21, 1992. The last interview was held at approximately 9:30 p.m. .• . •-• _ OTHER BUSINESS . • . t• There being no further bUsin4Si ' the meeting was adjourned at 9:45 p.m. • TLH Date ' City Clerk ••• :: : :••• •.• .• .•::. ••• ::.•:•:• ..•.•.• Pr MINUTES.PF A SPECIAL MEETING OF THE :AGAR CITY COUNCIL :':•:''''Eagan, Minnesota A special meeting of the Eagan1.6iY.......: Council was held on Tuesday, February 25, 1992 at 5:00 p.m. In the lunchroom of the Eagan Municipal Center building. Present were Mayor Egan and City Councilmembers Awada,McCrea and Wachter. City Councilmember Pawlenty arrived at approximately 6:10 p.m. and participated in the remainder of the special City Council meeting. Others present were Director of Public Works Colbert, Chief of Police Geagan, Director of Community Development Runkle, Director of Parks & Recreation Vraa, Director of Finance VanOverbeke and City Administrator Hedges. COMMENTS ON CITY COUNCIL/STAFF RETREAT .:.,.:. City Councilmembers reflected'iiil the Ciiii:Council/Department Head Retreat that was held on February 21 and 22 for the purpose of arielping:4000:tnIrn.04:witural diversity and a prioritization of service delivery for the next one to three yeait...:.::dititqdriollthenibers shared high marks for Larry Bakken, a facilitator for a portion of the retreat, and agreed that the instrument used for prioritizing service delivery provided by Deborah Bennett-Leet of Mapping Strategies will be a good management tool. City Administrator Hedges stated that the department heads have reflected on the retreat and their observations and conclusions are the same as the City Council and further stated that additional work sessions will be required to further analyze and use the data from the retreati::::: PROPOSED CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM (1992-1996) • ...•.•.•.•• • City Administrator Hedges reviewed.ffie draft capital improvements program budget stating that revisions had been made to all three (3) pertkInr#10(iing.Public Facilities (Part I), Equipment (Part II) and Public Enterprise & Parks (Part III) as directed bjithi:coirkouncil. He further indicated that the capital improvements program budget is a working document andii:i.tuideline for capital expenditures and that each part is reviewed annually and all expenditures require subsequent City Council review and authorization. Following a presentation of all three (3) parts of the draft CIP document, the City Administrator recommended a formal adoption of the CIP budget at the March 2 City Council meeting to provide direction to the community on how the City Council intends to finance public facility improvements, such as the outdoor pool/ice arena project,.Iaw.enforcement and fire station improvements, public works garage expansion and plans for other public facility.000o* City Councilmember Wachter expressed his appreciation for placing the public Works maintenance*facility expansion as a part of the capital improvements budget for 1993,further stating that tfitiiinprovement is essential for the storage of equipment that is currently kept outside the public.:works maintenance facility building due to a shortage of inside storage. City Councilmember McCrea expressed a concern that alternatives be given consideration to the law enforcement/municipal center expanOii****:00064*;aling the project down,leasing commercial, retail or office space for several years & it ettñg building for City offices at another location within the community. She further stated that before the City considers a building program, alternatives should be carefully analyzed and presented to the City Council for consideration. City Councilmembers expressed a concern that the need for municipal center office space and expansion may not be as critical in the near future due to the freeze on staffing.asalesyft..of a slow down in development and the recession. City Administrator Hedges stated that a stOdY.;Wiii*iierlOrmed of available space and alternatives to an expansion program for the existing municiP0anter building expressing some concern that decentralization can impact team work and interdepartnirintal interaction that:0 often required for efficient service delivery on a day to day basis. .•.•••• .:.:.:. • ••• Page 2/EAGAN SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MINUTES February 25, 1992 City Councilmember McCrea suggasted.:that...the;:appropriation as suggested In Part I, Public Facilities, be increased for the outdoor 04ktirfrtiniiiitial/J0*arana facility project which lowers the amount ...... necessary for the GO bond referendum prOPosed for that project. She further stated that the community, historically, has been given a choice to v*.on a municipal center and fire station improvements suggesting that the amount of resources allocated kitflii•se improvements under the community kwestment fund should be lowered and matched with the proposed GO bond referendum amount City Councilmember McCrea further stated that this change in financial allocation of public facilities would provide a more realistic GO bond referendum amount for the ice arena facility and outdoor swimming pool project. City Councilmember Wachter expressed his desire to leave the public facilities' portion of the capital improvements program as it is proposed stating that the major etnPhasis and.use of community investment funds should be for essential services, such as law enforcenjent/muniCiPal center expansion and fire station improvements. Mayor Egan and City Councilmember Av4da both agreed that the community Investment fund as presented should not be changed which includes aiioo,000 alkication for the ice arena facility and outdoor swimming pool as originally proposed. Mayor Egarts*ss.eci:theAlswssion on the proposed capital improvements program stating that the document will bePreieritertior:OffiCkliaction at the March 2 regular City Council meeting with the understanding that law enforcement/municipal center expansion proposed for 1993 in the amount of$2,500,000 as an appropriation to the community investment fund will include a qualifier that staff will research other alternatives that include a reduction in the scope of the project or an option to lease commercial, retail or office space to house certain departments. OUTDOOR SWIMMING POOLMEARENA PROJECT City Administrator Hedges stated that including representatives of the architectural firm of Ankenny Kell Richter&Associates have a two(2) hour presentation that will update the work of the Design Review Committee on refining concept desionokir;thesce.arena and outdoor swimming pool project data on the operational cost which is based on various assumptions, discussion on a date for the referendum and a preliminary review of a draft ballot question for Alia4pecial outdoor swimming pool/ice arena referendum. Fred Richter, architect representing Ankenny Kell Richter&Associates, presented a concept design for both the outdoor swimming pool and ice arena discussing many design elements that his firm and the Design Review Committee have considered for the project during the past several weeks. In addition, Mr. Richter reviewed a site plan that allows for expansion of the complex in future years if a second sheet of ice is to be added, additional facilities should be constructed and further consideration for expansion of the municipal center/law enforcement s4:;::Mr:::Richter also commented on the geometric orientation of the facilities, parking, traffic flows development relates to the site and public. He stated that his firm has been:eensitive tO;the appearance of the facility,trying to balance a policy of the City Council that requires the tm..,of brick and glass for all private and public buildings in the community, while remaining extremely sensitive to the cost He further stated that a brick facade is not a high cost item as perceived. However;::heltirtl**400etad:41 mixture of brick and other products as a more cost effective approach to complyingiiiithilieCititittliCii on the appearance of public buildings. City Councilmembers asked a variety of questions ranging from the impact of parking and roadway alignments to future expansion of the law enforcement/municipal center building, details on the bathhouse for the outdoor swimming pool, whether a solar application would reduce capital and operating costs and other related questions. Mayor Egan expressed his appreciation to the Design Review Committee members who were in attendance and the architects for..000entyiiPians that meet the type of capital project the City Council envisioned in early January when:ltie:aiihiteCtt we selected and the Design Review Committee ..•.•.•.• .•:::::•:•. appointed. •••••••• ...•.•. •:-.•:. Director of Parks & Recreation:.:Waa provided a detei* budget that addressed both anticipated revenues and expenses for both the swimming ice arena facilities. He stated that the Page 3/EAGAN SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MINUTES February 25, 1992 arena will provide many opportunities in:ad itiap.to.tiched ied.time for events requiring ice, such as Indoor soccer, corporate picnics, small court tennis:and iany ot}ie:recreational activities. Director of Parks & Recreation Vraa stated that both expenses'aihd'reVenues•art projected at approximately$340,000 for the first full year of operation. According tohits:research and financial information from other communities who operate outdoor swimming pools and arena facilities, the revenue numbers are conservative. Mr. Alan Menning, a member of the Design Review Committee, stated that it was his opinion that the projected revenues for the ice arena are low in comparison to other facilities located In like size communities as Eagan. City Councilmember Pawlenty commended the Director of Parks&Recreation for his research and budget projections stating that the number should not be over-inflated,especially revenues for the first year of operation, further expressing his appreciation fora conservative budget. Director of Parks&Recreation Visa further reviewed the total project costs stating that the estimates to date are$2.9 million for the ice arena to ility, $2i:2miilion for the outdoor swimming pool and bathhouse facility and an additional expense for engineering:ari:architectural fees that will be further refined prior to the March 2 City Council meeting. City Counolinembets?expressed a further desire to reduce the total cost of the project, especially any amount budgeted for equipment and other related expenses. City Administrator Hedges reviewed data prepared by Springsted, Inc. that provided various scenarios for a bond referendum amount and the impact a referendum would have on a residential home given certain residential market values based on either a 15 ora 20 year amortization schedule. He stated that, as an example, on a $4.5 million bond referendum;:.this monthly cost for a home with a market value of$120,000 would be $2 or annualized at $24.::. Councgmembers expressed a desire to use a twenty (20) year spread, stating that many new.reside rts:will.move into the community during the next decade who will use the facility and they should share in:any debt atofigation. Director of Finance VanOverbeke presented:a::draft:.:ballot question that he prepared based on direction given by the City Council for discussion purposes:;:: He also reviewed revisions to the ballot question that were made by both the City Attorney, Jim Sheldon, and the City's Bond Counsel, Steve Roshoit of Faegre & Benson. After a review and discussion regarding the draft ballot question,the Director of Finance was given direction to coordinate a final draft of the ballot question for a future City Council meeting. Mayor Egan expressed concern es:ta:whether.Clay:staff,architects and the community will be ready for a referendum if scheduled on April 7:as::a part:of.:tte�Presidential Primary. He suggested that it might be more prudent on the part of the City. o:delay the r.eferendum until the School Board election on May 19 allowing further refinement of the project:cost. City,Councilmember Pawlenty expressed his agreement, stating that the additional time would also provide::for better information and awareness throughout the community and in addition to Mayor?Egar's::: t::provide further project refinement which will hopefully reduce the total cost of the project: Mr. Don Slusarski, representing a group of residents in support of the proposed outdoor swimming pool/arena project,appeared and complimented the City Council and its Design Review Committee and staff for all the work and coordination to date on the propoaed project. He stated that a group of residents are organized, extremely excited about the project a '.feel that•May 19 is a better date for the referendum. He stated that this group is seeking business;:? orporate piedgee:and commitments to finance equipment and for other project expenses which help mace:the project more:cast effective and appealing to the community. He further stated that the number of residents supporting aptpject that will provide facilities for our youth has already exceeded 300 and is growl :in the community.:::Mr. Slusarski again thanked the City Council for their commitment to this project. Page 4/EAGAN SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MINUTES February 25, 1992 ....:...: BUILDING PERMIT/BILL JONES Director of Community Developme of fttiiiide sieitett'that Mr. Bill Jones is requesting special consideration by the City Council to process a building permit on an unplatted lot adjacent to the Wuthering Heights Subdivision. He stated that Mr. ees is scheduled this week to erect a manufactured home on an unplatted parcel and would not be able to'meet all the platting requirements without incurring a substantial delay that would be expensive and cause an inconvenience to the future owner. Director of Community Development Runkle stated that Mr. Jones is agreeable to platting the property, has made the proper application and paid all fees associated with platting in advance to the building permit. City Councilmembers expressed a concern aticut precedence and the issuance of a building permit prior to any notification to the adjoining property owners in advance of a formal platting process. After further discussion of the matter and in a motion by City COsiiacfinerp der Awada, seconded by Councilmember McCrea, with all members voting in favor, the building permit wae::approved to Mr. 8W Jones subject to the Community Development Department contacting adjoining.prpperty aw,ners and receiving a favorable concurrence of this action prior to any platting and further::that pri idurally:the platting must occur on the property. HILLS OF STONEBRIDGE Director of Public Works Colbert provided a brief introduction to the City Council on an issue regarding a condition to the Hills of Stonebridge plat that requires the removal of trees in a wetland area by the developer. He stated that an informational meeting::w's held on Monday, February 23, 1992 and adjoining property owners were concerned about di e:impact on the area if trees are removed, who was responsible for the tree removal and other:cpriorns•related to fulfilling this condition of development. City Councilmembers generally agreed that thS trees should tse removed by the developer prior to any final sign- off and acceptance of the Hills of Stonebridge:bevelopment Project which is tentatively scheduled for the March 17, 1992 City Council meeting. OTHER BUSINESS: There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 9:20 p.m. TLH Date City Clerk • • 1992-1996 PART I Public Facilities Community Single G.O. Public Investment Family Bond Enterprise Project Title Fund Bond Fund Referendum Fund 1992 Land Acq./Fire Station #6 $ 100,000 Ice Arena Facility & Outdoor Swimming Pool 500,000 $850,000 $4,000,000 Municipal Center Site Preparation 500,000 Total 1992 $1,100,000 $850,000 $4,000,000 1993 Law Enf./ Municipal Center Expansion $2,500,000 Fire Station #6 & Equipment 1,400,000 Public Works Maintenance Facility Expansion $700,000 Total 1993 $3,900,000 $700,000 1994 None 1995 None 1996 None TOTAL PUBLIC FACILITIES $5,000,000 $850,000 $4,000,000 $700,000 Summary Total Law Enforcement $3,000,000 $ 3,000,000 Ice Arena & Outdoor Pool 500,000 $850,000 $4,000,000 5,350,000 Fire 1, 500,000 1,500,000 Public Works Maintenance $700.000 $ 700,000 $5,000,000 $850,000 $4,000,000 $700,000 $10,550,00 1992 - 1996 PART II EQUIPMENT General Equipment Equipment Fund Certificate 1992 Data Processing $ 93,570 Finance 49,850 Community Development 14, 000 Police 95, 200 Fire 245, 000 Public Works/Engineering 39,500 Streets 21, 500 Parks and Recreation 105, 000 TOTAL 1992 $663,120 1993 Data Processing 58,700 Community Development $45, 000 30, 000 Police 201, 000 Fire Public Works/Engineering 241, 000 Central Services 10, 000 Parks and Recreation 133 , 000 TOTAL 1993 $673,700 1994 Administration 13 , 000 Data Processing 23 ,700 Community Development 30, 000 15, 000 Police 233 , 000 Fire 121, 000 Public Works/Engineering 178, 000 Central Services 25, 000 Parks and Recreation 194 , 000 TOTAL 1994 $802,700 1995 Data Processing 19, 200 Community Development 30, 000 Police 188, 500 Fire 550, 000 Public Works/Engineering 173, 000 Central Services 7, 000 Parks and Recreation 71, 000 TOTAL 1995 $1,038,700 1996 Total Vehicle and Related Equipment - 700, 000 TOTAL 1996 700, 000 TOTAL EQUIPMENT $75,000 $3,878,220 PART III PUBLIC UTILITIES, STREETS & PARKLAND (1992 - 1996) I P 1 P 1 < I > 1 O O 2 1 1 1 I 1 • C O I W 1 OJ▪ U I W I > 1 W W I O O I 1 F 1 _ 1 N Z 1 1 Y LL 1 K < 1 d 1 W\ 0 0 0 0 0 O N I O O o o O O W d " Iri o 4 W U V } w d CO U CO 1 N N V> K W ~ N 1 ~ ~ 0 W N N co 1 1 W CO \ I I.IJ < 1 < U . Z o o K W w K S N)0 COO 1 0 0 0 O In N N ti I O 0 0 0 < Z 10 .1 N CO OS In n. Ill U m O M W 69 ~ W 0. e- N M 1 CO N W 64 1 i N = O Z I— m U Z Ho I I I N j •O D 0 O 1 CO I I I 1 W < W I U Z 1 0_ LL I O 2 W W u I 1 I A A I CC 2 1.11 Ln o m i I W LL N W Z 1 u I 1 A 1 Co 0 9- 0 0 In 0 0 0 0 0 1 V < W V! O N 0 1A N 0 07 0 CO 5- h 1 1 O N O )O CO N n. N In P 60 00 0 U N Os 69 K N w 44 69 44 M 1 N N N 69 W N W LIJ O C ^ W j 01 W Z • 01 C C 0 O C M 1- U I- C C C y N f IU N 4 W a 0 H W Ip 10 N O O C S E O oa 0 U U O dl N N ce U c) ~ V Y E O N N• \ O C o N C N Q \ V N N . I- U) VI V P T N W C d '0 N u ,�IO C 3 • ^ .) -J N N N - 2 3 N F- N > \ N W Ce Z 0 W 3 I F- < W W I < Q f, I .J-. 1 I 6- W U N S 0 LL O I 1 K N I I N < & I !4P�T+ 1 H W 1 1 4 g a 8 0 I- n_ o W °o a - U W •-• > O O▪ O W • 0 N Z 7 IC LL OC 4 d • W 0 0 0 0 0 N 7 O O O O N W S O O O O •O W - - - i O In O M u A w e- r 0 > w O OC N D W N N O W N Q I- K 4 0 H N S 7 O OC ce O x co O N fn a o Os 0' u o O. W on CI_ M .. O N In 0 W o • - z O U O] Z • N Z OC O LIJ • 7 N Z O 8 > o • W m I- O W S • N Co • Z 0 O to O O O 0 4 O O 0 0 W U S •-• V1 M OO CO a N N N N 7 O ex W U 0 0 0 0 _ _ N 4 O co M a0 N N 0 LL N N H 0 O O O O 0 0 OD I- 0 O O 0 es- 4 W O V\ •O •O V1 0 N 0. I O N N CV N . N a0 O O U N N 2 W •O a a a O W W a MC C 2 N U K O U W vii 3 CI Ea S I- U▪ I N 41 W a a >W — O O .- 's '5 d U O. CO 1 W W eV C d O 4t p U 110 N _ co L •- C 41 01 4E 3 C L '3' ' = [l E J 1D J • P Y O I- X S aw t a a In m O — 0 I- a 0 a o 4 a j J U U 0 O I H K IN. I pN. N H w O 1 P rn ■ 1 I 1 I I 1 1 I I 2 1 1 • w ° O 4 1 1 • U > O 1 w W I 1 O 0 1 I 1 1 I 1 W 1 I 1 •-. O 1 1 N 2 1 1 M 1 1 Y w I I OC 1 t Q 1 1 a 1 1 1 1 \ lU 0 O. 0 0 P 1 0 0 I I 0 0 I W 0 O '0 O n oG M I 0 0 1` LL = .� f� O O U O 4O 1 I ' 1 N 1 w > N 3 w w N oc 1 1 1 1 N 1 1 1 1 1 I W N 1 I 1 1 1 \ 2 1 1 W Q 1 1 H 1 1 12 0 Q 1 1 H 1 1 N 1 1 I 1 1 1 X 1 O 1 1 2 I 1 W I I K 1 1 W 1 1 1 1 1 •O 1 N O O1 O P U I u1 Ui N N I 1 Q O O r r 1 ,_ uo .O 1 U O a a v 1 n M 1 W m 1 IA VI 1 _ d 1 CO N 1 N 1 1 1 1 1 1 N I O LL O 1 2 2 1 r 0 1 U m 1 2 1 1 2 1 W 1 1 1 1 • ▪ L. N Z O 1 1 W 2 1 > O 1 S m 1 H K 1 1 W 1 1 S 1 t I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 O O 1 1 I 1 • an 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 I 1 1 H 1 1 2 I 1 W U U 1 1 Z 1 1 O. I 1 _ 1 0 I I o O I 1 to w tY 1 1 U 1 1 ry 1 1 IN n 1 1 1 J N N 1 1 Q O 1 1 K Z M M I 1 111 W 1_ 1 1 W N R 1 1 N . . I 1 1 O I (V O } fN� r 1 O O lr1 1 'U 1- 1 ..pp. 1N�. 1 O O O 0 MI MI w w 1 I op I d N 1 M N W 1 N 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 . I 0) C d u 1 1 . W 1 2 T C Y O C 1- _ 3 4, C O 7 1 fiL V�1 U �+ C7O pa T. 3 CGNII 1 0 N 4• \ 1. J OTl 1 \C N N N N N L NCC L 1 7 (IV L En L IQ- IY M C 7 3 h• 1 ex • U J CO N N 7i 7t N H 1 Y N I 1 c°3 w s 1 I W W S 1 I U •-•N S 1 M 1 1 1 4 m I pM. I W P 1 G 1 T '- 1 •- 1 1 i II I i ti 1 1 11 I 1 II 11 — — 1 1 11 • 0 o i i ii ii ii v i i II Ill 1 1 II > p 1 II pW 1 1 II 0 I I 11 I 1 11 1 II 1 11 1 II p I 11 N z 1 11 W 1 II u K 1 11 I. O. 1 II N 1 II W 0 O II N 7 CS 0 O O O O I; ^ II 11 LL V• V• O I 1� 11 U 3 N 0 1 •O 11 O[ N N I O I 11 7 N 1 w II 1 1 W N 6- I I 1 1 I- t I 1 K I 1 I U 1 1 N 1 I 1 1 1 II 1 1 1 II 0 I 1 11 II 2 I 1 II K 1 1 II W I 1 11 W I I 11 K I I 11 1 1 11 I I 11 ~ 1 1 P I I N I 1 .t II N co I I 11 a 0 I II U 6 I 1 W W co 1 1 II I• I 1 N 11 co i 1 tin ii I I 11 I 1 11 1 I 11 N I 1 11 a_ •LL-• a I 1 II r O 1 1 II LI a 1 1 II it 1 II U. 1 II II • 0 IA Z 0 1 11 1 11 F K CO 1 11 S 1 11 1 I 1 I 1 I 0 0 1 1 1 • Z 1 1 1 a O I I 1 a 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 I 1 11 W O O O 1 1 O II F- 1.- O O O I I O II a s o 0 o I I O II W U I I II Z in M at 1 1 •O II d - W N N 1 1 �0 II 7 1- N N I 1 W 11 1 1 11 W 1 II U 1 1 II 0 0 0 0 1 I 0 II 0 0 0 0 I I 0 II 0 0 0 o 1 I II < 0 I II 00 2 .t 1A 0 0• a I •0 II 2 111- Al w w 3 I I II w 1 1 N 11 17 1 1 II ■ 1 11 I 1 11 1 1 II 0 0 0 0 0 O 1 I N II 0 0 0 0 0 0 I 1 •O II 0 I- O O O O 0 1 1 II J U 1 1 1 11 6 W N f� IA IA N M r 1 I •O II - 0 0 N 69 N Al N M I I ONO II I- K N W 1 1 11 CL 1 1 II 1 11 1 1 1 •a 1 i ii a I I II 0 I 0 1 I II L 1 1 II Gyy 0) I) 1 1 II 01 M C 1 I II 2 C O) 10 C 1 1 11 1 II 1- O X . . T 1 1 II U N N 1 1 II W R •d N a a V > 1 1 II = O L U 1 1 1 > W W 1 I M 11 CO N 1 1 p O C d 0 1 1 P 11 N 1 N 1 •- 11 C N I m I 11 10 V V K 2 1 C I 11 C 1`0- E 1 v i II L Q 1 -• 1 a 11 0 F W U N I N m i ii > 2 f7 11 O Z 1 I I W 2 1 0 1 11 J 1 11 H 7 I 11 a O 1 7 I 11 U W 1 CO 1 11 1 I II M 1 M 1 II K Q O 1 P 1 II Y U 1 O• 1 11 1 11 II 1 1 1 . J I 1a- 1 O I 1 I 1 I • z ce U I OJ U 1 > O I W W O O I I I I ILI I- I I N I 1 Y W I 1 a I 1 1 I N LA-... 0 N M O O 10 CI O O 1 W K O �0 O pp0� GC U N 8.1 O N N N O �f .1 1 • W > N IdA1 Y1 K I N K I N I 1 1 I I W N I I u. I Z I I W 4 I I N I 1 I I W I I K I 1 W 1 I K I I . I S EOO Ill I 0 0 0 N 110. O O O ul 4 z t�. VI I 0,1 0 U O O M J 1 M N • m 6 I N IA O. I N N W I I I I I 1 1 I I I N I 1 (9 Opz I 1 O I ■ • m a - I I LL I I • u. I I O Z N 1 I N ZOZ S j O I I S2 H Cr I I Ili I I 1 I I • N 1 O O I • Z 1 o O 1 m 1 1 I I 1 W I 1 H I 1 Z < I I W U I I _ I I CI. 0- I I . I I I • pC I IL U I I U I 1 I I 1 I en• a CO CO I I I Z II.. M W I I w 1 I 0 I I 0 M 00 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 I 0 0 .-O 00 1,- 0 0 O O O I �- O I t(l O O Its I Q U• O I U O - P 0 I VI 1/I CO . P O O Cl r0 0 44 44 w tri I 4 4 K N I d N I 1 N IA N I N 1 I I I I I I I U C I O W I O = CO 0 , C I C C I C J O I (../ I- C C 1 U R VI N I- C I N co N 3 T I O K x E O •- 10 41 H I K U U N 0 C In — 1 a N C N ). 3 1 I O J a 0 A 0 N• Y . J 1_ J T C+ 1 \ N N N 1- N 1-al N I C C C w ¢ C C •.... ti C CO I 0 U J Cl N Cl 3 3 CO I- 0 • ).- I N > 1 4) I I N 4 I O U = 1 `. I U U I J 1 Q F- .+ 1 I- 1 U N x I = I — 1 Cr apt. 1 gyp}. W O I I I I I I J 1 1 Q 1 I 1.- 1 I ° I I I 1 1 1 I 1 • 1 H I 1 1 I I I Lel _ I I 1 > CI 1 1 W w 1 1 O O I I 1 1 I I 1- I I m Z I I 7 I I IC LL I 1 CC 1 1 1 I I I N .- 1 I I 0 0 I In• 0 N M 0 0 {On 0 I 0 0 I w CL 0 .0 0 0 I'- CO I 03 0.0 .0 I W > M N ~ IA a 0 1 N N 1 N K I 1 7 W VI I 1 In 1 1 I O 1 w m 1 1 \ r 1 w .0 I 1- CC I Q O I N 1 co 1 ■ 1 1 r I 1 m ■ 1 p 1 1 2 1 1 L.K 1 1 w I 1 1 W I 1 IY I I 0 IN N I 0 0 O = CO I I 0 0 0 V) P O o I 0 O 0 In VI II�� pp,, a i ^n f� 1� 1 I I` P O U O O M ...1. I 3 NI N W m N 1 N VI n I to IA w I I z 4 ■ I m I I I I 1 • u. I 1 N Z O en > O 1 w m 1 1- K 1 IV I 1 1 1 1 • In I 1 O C2 1 I I 1 m I I 1 1 I 1 W 1 1 I- H 1 1 2 Q 1 1 w U 1 I t ^• I I CL I_ I I 1 w LLI 1 I U 1 I 1 2 2 1 I O I C0 2 CO CO I Z LL M N I W I 17 1 1 o I I 0 r-.- 0 I� O I Vi 0 0 0 I in U▪ 1- 0 I y 1 a w NO o .4. P ? .�- 1M I .- CO . 0. O• I O O U M O N N N I .t .f N I Y1 W 44 I a N I I 0 N N I N I I I I I 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 . I) I C I C I •O 01 I o i4, I - IUII 1 U F. Ilht nfl ' I I I I 10 O I = = O I 4C I I 10 • N>- K N T I oU IL 3 I I W W S I J I I- U Q I f 1 U N x 1 7 1 I 1 Cr pJ. 1 .pt� 1 W P I Q I T •- I '- I H II II II II II I II 1 < H 1 o I II I I 11 1 I II 1 II 1 • 04 0 1 II I II II O 4 II 1 U 11 1 > O II 1 W W 11 1 0 0 11 1 11 1 II 1 II 1 ✓ 1 II 1 ^.• 0 1 II I N Z 1 II Y LL 1 II 1 aY 1 11 1 < I H 1 a 1 II 1 11 I N 1 II ..- I I N• 0 0 0 0 1 11 0 I W K 0 0 0 1 III CO 1 • U /- 1„1 .t 11 O 1 OC .- N 1 II 1� 1 W > N N I II 1 N O 1 M II N 7 W 1 N 1 H I I W N 1 \ Z 1 W < 1 1- 1 0 4 0 ■ I- 1 N ■ 1 1 O 1 2 1 I K 1 W 1 ce 1 E 1 1.11 N 1 I M < 0'Z i i t` U O 1 I `O W co a N N N 1 I 1 1 1 N 1 I 2 a I Z 1 O 1 U In I 2 1 4 I 2 1 LL 1 • 0- I ttl N 2 p tn I 1 1 III 2 8 > O 1 • W CO 1 � I- 1 W 1 Z I I I N 1 •O O 1 1J 0 1 m I I W 0 0 0 0 1 I- 0 0 O I 0 I Z 0 U O 0 I W 1 I� 1 1 a_ 1 N N N N I 3 N N N 1 1 W W U I 1 O 0 0 0 1 .- 1 C O I N 0 �0.p epVp 1 0 1 LL1 2 0- N N N N 1 O 1 W 1 N I CO 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 O 1 I .- 1 o 0 0 O O 0 I I -s 1 O O O O O O I < W▪ N CO O N M N CO 1 �O 1 0 0 � N N .- N M 1 1 CO I N N N I I . 2 I 1 1 a a 7 ] Q W W CI W CC 3 I+ 0 O W N 3 N > C.I- W W a N a a HI > O U 7 U J J M O U U W Q C CO 0 a N > W W '{ W v ` p at p N N • 1- •- — C to OI y Q 3 C W N O O E • CC a E U L < 4 • F W U aJ Ii w N O N al O 2. K W 2 I O S I 0 O. 1 0 I W .+ 1 1 C▪ 0 I 7 I U W 1 IL I 04 4 p 4 1 W P O 1 1 r 1 1 ■ I 1 I i Q I • F 1 o I 1 1 1 1 o • w CL• U 1 w 1 > O ■ W W I • O I I 1 1 IL I I I N 2 I LL I 1 Y 1 G I d 1 pp .0}p 1 a• a W w M -O O O N N I O 0 p[ t4) M N N o I N N i 41 > M N I 1 N Oe N N I o 1 1 W N I til U 2 1 < 0 I I N I 1 1 I I I 1 M 1 2 I W I 1 el' 1 I IY I I u.W I OC 1 I 1 1 I• O.} P P I O 0 0 N N 'O N P 0 0 0 1 U O VI N N N co in 1 W IC N N N N N N I 1 V) 1 I I I I I I O 1 U In I a 1 I LL I I 0. • 0 I W O N I 1 N 2 O w m 1 rW oe 1 S 1 . 1 I 0 a I I 2 I •0 O I fL I I I 1 I I W 2 4 I W U p LL I W W I U I I N N I I I N I I IV a j N b I I I U I I I I ON I O O O 1 1- o In o 0 W N t O M In I 0 ^ 4 I N , 00 In I I- C M N N P N Al A 1 N I a N N I ( I I Z.- 1 I UI C U O 0•-• 1- s C L ° o 7 " U ` .0 C L w rn y ~ y VI 3 • O K S Z O • 04 - d 330 g a 0 .Y105 41 L. VI 0 °I C Et VI L. 7 N ♦+ 0 N J I- N L 7 I+ \ N N L N L CO C N J I) L OI L C 7 L 3 O CO CO O • . ,- U J N N VI 1- N 3 3 N H 1- > I 1 1 W 3 1 1 1 Ge Ml I Vpl. I w P I P > I II H It 11 II II II II < 11 11 ° 11 11 11 11 11 11 Z I 11 II OC 0 1 11 I1 • lal •-• 1 1 11 U I 11 11 W H II > O I 11 11 W II 11 c, o 1 11 II 1 11 11 ILI I- I H II H II I1 1 It II N Z 1 H 11 Y LL I 11 II << ix I 11 I1 CL___N I II II I 0 11 1 11 N U I 0 II a0 11 u3 ad 3, s 1 0 11 N 11 U 0 11 HO 11 W > I N I CO 11 N K O N I 1 N 11 I 11 W N 1 1 11 1 11 1 11 w < 1 1 11 1 1 < I 1 II N I 1 11 1 1 11 I X II 7 11 Cl 11 Z 11 Lu 1 W 11 II O I ce it 11 1 11 N 1 CM 11 N N 1 P II < o I 11 U O I 0 II LLJ 1 N 11 N II- 1 1 N 11 I 11 1 1 11 1 1 II 1 1 11 N 1 V 0 I I II 2 2 o In 1 I 11 a I I 11 Z I I 11 LL I I II I I II at I• 0 W i 0 Z N 1 1 I I II II 11 X Ill 1 1 11 1 11 1 II 1 11 I 11 1 II 0 o I II • 0 I II N 1 II 1 II 1 II 1 II 1 11 W 0 0 1 I O 1 a << 0 00 I I 00 I W I W N N 1 1 IN IN 1 I I La U 1 1 1 I 1 I 1 II O O 0 0 I '0 II O O O O 1 N 11 al 0 N M K •O 1 Y1 II W 1 11 U 1 11 1 II I p 1 II 0 0 0 0 0 P I I ..- 0 0 0 0 0 f- 11 U 1.- < II < W N N P 111 ■ O O 11 O O O N N I N I N O .f 11 d N N N II M II N I1 11 a II a 11 a 11 II W 11 1 L L 11 M C 3 H UCH II O 10 N 3 N 10 II W a m a a o i 1 11 1 11 I II J 1 a 1 O I I- 1 1 ■ I I•• D_' O W 1 1 O U J 1 W W 1 O O 1 1 1 W 1 I 1- 1 1 1 I Y j I 1 0L 1 1 d 1 1 1 1 8O .- O n• 0 O tel I O I W K N M 1 0 0 1 LL ce U N J 1 I M O WK W 1 1(n N N J N 1 N W 1 1 1 1 I 0 1 1 L.LL N 1 i \z 1 1 ■W a 1 1 1- 2 1 1 a U 1 1 N 1 1 1 1 C1 1 1 ■ W 1 1 K 1 1 W 1 1 1 w 1 1 CY 1 1 VI In 1 O O 1 N P P 1 O o N N 1 1 a o 1 .0 •0 1 m W W 1 W N N 1 2 1 1 N 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 O W p I at - a 1 Li i m 1 1 LL 1 1 1 • LI- 0 Vi 2 p I p W Z 1 ZO W m 1 1- re 1 i 1 1 1 1 • N 1 1 O O 1 1 ZZ 1 1 c O ; I 1 on 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 Z• a 1 I W U 1 1 _ •-• 1 I 0. LL 1 1 0 • K I I 1 W W 1 1 u 1 1 n r i M M I t 1 I a O 1 111 a P P 1 W I W 1 c, 1 1 1 O M In (00p 1 0 O 0 1 O .1 N 'O I 0 0 0 1 J U• I- p 1 a W 0 P Q N • K. �•�} I N In I I N- I O• 0 U N- LO I 44 O O I N N V 1 1 d 1 N N I 1 V/ N 1 . 1 1 1 1 1 II 1 1 U C 1 C O 3 C O• C " F M 1 U 0. -C C - • ~ YW 01 I o ~ I W CO 1 N 3 T O• CI x 0C O 1 M L X411 • U U 1/1 1 O 0/ Cr, O.a U N M I _.# Ill m �i 01 01 1 C C in .• - -J 1 C D r° \ N N N 1 1- N L N L T N 1 J[ 01 03 d I L L 4... C W i _C OI < I w N •C C = Q 0 77 C. U J N N N 1 7 7 N H IO • . N ,- \ N 1 .W. 1 0 0 w s 1 r -1 9 W W = 1 1 1- K 1 6 1 1 U N' 0 z 1 7 1 1 1 0L 43 1• O 1 W O I P 1 1 If 1 I II I -J 4 I II I O I II I Il I 1 N 1 1 11 1 • 11 K O I 11 W 1 11 a F- O 6 1 n W U I II > O I II 0 0 I II 1 M 1 II I W I- I II I V/ 2 I I I 7 1 1 1 Y LL 1 1 1 OC I I I a i I I 1 I I m 1 1 I I •.O I CO• O 1 1 .t I W a I I^ I 1 LL 2 1 I p I 0 I I 00 I W > I I 0 1 7 W 1 I N 1 N I I 1 I I I 1 I 1 C1 1 I I LLN 1 I 1 H 1 I I w• <1 1 1 • OC I I I C, I I ,I I N ■ I I I I 1 i 1 I 1 7 I I I O I I 1 2 1 I 1 W 1 1 I a' 1 I 1 W 1 I ■ I 1 W 1 I I 2 I I I 1 I I 1 1 I 1 1 L 1 1 I N N I I < 0 I I I 2 I I I U O I I I W CO 1 1 1 a I I N I I N I I I I 1 I 1 1 1 1 N 1 1 1 0 LL O 1 1 Z 1- a 1 I I 41 m 1 1 1 1 1 I 2 1 1 1 • Vl 2 O cn 1 1 Q > O I 1 m I 1• 1 I 1 I 1 1 I I I 1 1 I 1 I 1 • N I I O O I I • 2 I I 0 O 1 1 CO 1 1 I I 1 I I I 1 0 I 2 6 1 O 1 W r I 1 E 1 en 1 a LL 1 1!1 I a .- e N O 04 1 1 W W 1 1 U 1 1 O 0 0 I 0 1 0 0 0 I 0 1 O 0 O I I ▪ O OC 2 � •0 1 •O I W n 1 0 2 N A N I 0 1 N I 1 1 1 1 I 0 0 0 1 I 11��11 I O 0 0 1 1 r 1 F- O O O I I .f I G W m In .} '0 I I 1` I 0 0 g N � . 1R � N 1 1 M 1 I I I a a I I M I 1 I N 1 I I 1 1 a7a I I W ' 1 1 W 1 1 � 3 _� ; 2 N CO u 1 1 .- 0 i u• T I I w a I m a a w > 7 d w 1.11 tu 7 v u • 0- T y 1 I.- •O w F L 1 O O C 0 01 1 P 1 N I CO I 7 0 E 1 'O i W 6 i R CJ n Cl. w CO I— i m z I CN7 • ).- 0 2 1 0 a I O I 0 0 I 7 1 U 1 CO I I I I Q d I p<. I I 1.0 O P I I > I I I II ■ 11 I 11 I II I < II 1 11 0 O II 1 I- 11 1 11 1 11 1 11 1 • IY 0 0 0 11 1 viII N 11 1 11 1 11 1 ■ 1 ^ O 11 1 . Z 11 ■ 2 LL II 1 2 11 1 < 11 I 1 11 1 II 1 \ W 0 .0 0 60 II 1 0 O 0 1 U) 0 N I 0 0 4 0 0 0 1 W 1' N 00 0 0 0 0 0 1 9. 2 O \ 0 00 0 O 0 1 U •O N •O ^ O Vl (l 1 ~ O N O 1 W > N W 1 n w N N N co 1 ■ 1 . O ■ LL N i km 1 \ 2 1 W < 1 N K 1 H 1 co 1 I 1 1 1 O 1 Z 1 W 1 K 1 W 1 1 W 1 K 1 1 I- O d o O O O 1 N 03 in M O 0 0 0 1 N N tp I y O P U O 00 v 0. 1 W CO N 1 6 N M 1 N N w a 49 w 1 1 0 0 0 1 O O O 1 O O O I N 1 1, I 0 O O O 1 . Z 2 O P O• 1 VO V, N VI I m I Z N N N N 1 2 1 • 1} I O W 0 0 § � o 0 0 1 > m 0 0 1 I- 2 I- N W N N 1 1 •0 0 0 0 m W 1 1 I- 1 2 < 1 1 X • I 1 1 Ii 1 I ^ 1 1 1 I W W 1 I U 1 I 0 1 1 <C1 ^ 1 12 2 In z LL" i 0 LLI 1 1 1 1 00 0 00 0 I 00 00 00 0 0 1 0 0 I- 0 • O V I 0 0 0 0 0 1 J U H I I < W 4) 0 0 I 0 • 0 1 •0 O 0 d 1 O O H P 0. N — I CO X00 1Cn N •O 1 91 N I 6 N N 0 1 O. 1- N N N N N I N Al 1 I 1 Ww S 2 T C U C i 0 0 .0 C C " 0 5 'a 1 W 1 0) •.- 1-) L N l- 1 _ 0 0 0 4) Z • 0 U U N O w CO 1 O. w w w ). - I D 0 w CO O) 7 4) 0 0 1 N N \ J L J >. 1 N. N N N F- N N 1 CC� 6 Y C w 1 7 U i rn Iw+ Iw+ C ` 3 0 i • Ai U J H N N OF 0 IS N ti OF i )• \ N I W 1 0 F f 1 •.• 1 W 3 1 I- 1 1.3 S 1 ■ r O 1 .+ I N x 1 5 1 W 1 W 1 ' W I f 1 U. 7 1 D 1 --- 11 I I II I I II I Q I II 1 I I 1 O 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 • w ° a ti 1 I to • 1 1 W 1 I!1 1 O I I O I 0 n 1 I 1 I N I w i 1 -+ O 1 N z 1 7 1 Y LL 1 2 1 4 1 CI. 1 1 \ w i 1 ,o 1 Ill Ce 1 0 1 LL i i 1 1 U F 1 W I 1 1 > I I N OC 1 1 1 W 1 1 1 N 1 ■ N 1 1 1 1 1 O• N I I 1 1 \ 2 W 1 1 4 0 1 1 N I I 1 1 1 1 , E 1 1 O 1 1 O 1 1 2 ■ 1 ill 1 1 cc 1 ■ 1 1 ■ 1 IP 1 1 o 1 1 1 1 1 1 I- I I v I N I I In 1 N N 1 1 4 O 1 00 1 U O I I •-• I tu a ° I In 1 N I N 1 1 1 1 0 i N 1 O 1 a LL O 1 1 O 1 a --• a I 1 P I m I I I o N 1 N 1 1 LL 1 1 • Y. O N 2 O >• O• m 1 I I 1 I I I I 0 1• I I 1 I I- 1` I i i N 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I I_ 6 1 1 N 1 ■ 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I W O O 1 1 co I O O I O I a 2 4 co O 1 O 1 S • .t -t 1 I 4 1 O LL P P I 1 P I N N I 1 N I O ac 1 1 W U 1 1 1 1 1 O 1 I r I 4 O I 1 1 K I N 1 W 0 1 N 1 LL 1 1 U 1 1 1 1 1 O O I O 1 U H O Co I t 1 OP O 0 1 I ^ I_ CO N a r... 1 M 1 N 1 1 a 1 1 1 1 W 1 1 W L L 1 1 •.. W ✓ W 1 1 Ii C ][ U 1 1 O C W 3 N . I I IIP n. . M • _a L > 1 I 0 U 0- U 0- l) 7 7 0 I W I VI. N 11 II N U I IX I 0 C 0 N I I p 1 LL I 41 0 0 1+ cyE 3 C 1 r 1 C W 7 O n E p1 C E. G V 1 • W U W N m 1 ° 1 1 I- > S V O W S O 2 1 .• 1 1 U a 1 O 1 1 "' 1 J 1 1 U W I 1 W 1 I Cie 0 1 7 1 1 7 1 1 N 0 1 7 1 1