Loading...
12/01/1992 - City Council Regular AGENDA REGULAR MEETING EAGAN CITY COUNCIL EAGAN, MINNESOTA MUNICIPAL CENTER BUILDING DECEMBER 1, 1992 6:30 P.M. I. 6:30 - ROLL CALL & PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE (BLUE) II. 6:35 - ADOPT AGENDA & APPROVAL OF MINUTES (BLUE) III. 6:45 - DEPARTMENT HEAD BUSINESS (BLUE) A. FIRE DEPARTMENT f . I 1. Official Recognition of Dale Nelson as Fire Chief IV. 6:55 - CONSENT AGENDA (PINK) Pa. A. PERSONNEL ITEMS p. ,. B. LICENSES, Plumbers /pp y C. LICENSE, Off-Sale Beer, SuperAmerica, 2250 Cliff Road D. CONTRACT 92-03, Approve Change Order tl (Well Pump Modifications) P.4, E. CONTRACT 92-03, Approve Final Payment (Well Pump Modifications) 1pP�. '7 F. DECLARE Surplus Property/Authorize Disposition, City Council Chambers' Dias Wing Units G. CONTRACT 92-J, Acknowledge Completion/Authorize Acceptance (Applebee's - Utilities) V. 7:00 - PUBLIC HEARINGS (SALMON) �� /O A. 1993 Property Tax Levy, General Fund Budget and Public Enterprise Fund Budget 3 g B. PROJECT 640, St. Thomas Becket - Streets & Utilities VI. OLD BUSINESS (ORCHID) LON A. PROJECT 88-55, Review of Escrow Account Balance, Kingswood 2nd Addition P 65B. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT, Tom Thumb, to Allow outdoor Storage in a Commercial Zoning District on Lot 1, Block 1, Bicentennial 1st Addition Located Along the South Side of Yankee Doodle Road in the NE 1/4 of Section 16 P.9 6 C. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT, Tom Thumb, to Allow Outdoor Storage in a Commercial Zoning District on Lots 4 and 5, Block 1, Blackhawk Plaza Addition, Located Along the North Side of Diffley Road in the SE 1/4 of Section 20 VII. NEW BUSINESS (TAN) p.$7 A. DIRECTION, Daniel Drive/Diffley Road Parcel A jCei. 1993 Fee Schedule 1;11C. AMENDMENT, Ordinance, Section 10.43, Fire, Burglary, and Safety Alarm Regulations and Requirements �'13 SD. LICENSE, On-Sale Liquor, Holiday Inn (Doubletree Hotel) , 2700 Pilot Knob Road 13,E. SPECIAL PERMIT, Faith Church of Glory, to Allow Church Services to be Held in an Office Warehouse at 3584 Kennebec Drive and Zoned LI (Light Industrial) , Located in the NW1/4 of Sec 17 ,p. / /O F. COMPREHENSIVE GUIDE PLAN AMENDMENT, City of Eagan, Changing the Land Use Designation �/ from D-III (Mixed Residential, 6-12 Units/Acre) to IND (Industrial) for Approximately 62 Acres of Land and a REZONING from R-3 (Townhouse Residential) to LI (Light Industrial) of Approximately 57 Acres of the Above 62 Acres Located on the West Side of Lexington Avenue South of the Bulk Mail Facility Generally in the N1/2 of the SE1/4 of Sec 10 FIVirG. AMENDMENT, Ordinance, to Chapters 11 and 13 of the City Code Regarding Boulevard and Trail Regulations VIII. ADDITIONAL ITEMS (GOLD) I%. LEGISLATIVE/INTERGOVERNMENTAL AFFAIRS UPDATE (GREY) X. ADMINISTRATIVE AGENDA (GREEN) XI. VISITORS TO BE HEARD (for those persons not on agenda) XII. ADJOURNMENT The City of Eagan is committed to the policy that all persons have equal access to its programs, services, activities, facilities and employment without regard to race, color, creed, religion, national origin, sex, disability, age, marital status or status with regard to public assistance. Auxiliary aids for persons with disabilities will be provided upon advance notice of at least 96 hours. If a notice of less than 96 hours is received, the City of Eagan will attempt to provide such aid. V MEMO TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCILMEMBERS FROM: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES DATE: NOVEMBER 25, 1992 SUBJECT: AGENDA INFORMATION FOR THE DECEMBER 1, 1992 CITY COUNCIL MEETING ADM`AGENDA/APPROVE MINUTES After approval is given to the December 1, 1992 City Council agenda, the regular meeting minutes for the November 17, 1992 City Council meeting and the minutes of the special City Council meeting of November 5, 1992 and the special City Council meeting of November 21, 1992, the following items are in order for consideration. DEPARIMENT READ BUSINESS A. FIRE DEPARTMENT Item 1. Official Recognition of Dale Nelson as Fire Chief--Dale Nelson has been elected as Fire Chief and will assume office on December 1, 1992. It will be appropriate at Tuesday's meeting to recognize Mr. Nelson's appointment and have him be sworn in at that time. Following recognition of Mr. Nelson's appointment, City Administrator Hedges will coordinate the swearing in. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To officially recognize the election of Dale Nelson as Fire Chief of the Eagan Volunteer Fire Department. Agenda Information Memo December 1, 1992 City Council Meeting CONSENT AGE There are seven (7) items on the agenda referred to as consent items requiring one (1) motion by the City Council. If the City Council wishes to discuss any of the items in further detail, those items should be removed from the Consent Agenda and placed under Additional Items unless the discussion required is brief. PERSONNEL ITEMS A. PERSONNEL ITEMS Item 1. Winter Recreation Leaders--Recreation Supervisor Oyanagi is recommending the hiring of the following for the temporary, seasonal position of Winter Recreation Leader: Returning Staff New Staff Ross Anderson Ken Fry Steve Cramer Amy Hampton Ian Dozier Melinda Kaltenhauser Mike Geere Jerry Koch Andy Halverson Andy Lachenmayer Cory Lynch Eric Mathiason Matt Marxer Kristie Thompson Jason Myrlie Michelle Tibbs Benita Soller Ray Sperl Brent Tait Ross Vrieze ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the hiring of Ross Anderson, Steve Cramer, Ian Dozier, Ken Fry, Mike Geere, Andy Halverson, Amy Hampton, Melinda Kaltenhauser, Jerry Koch, Andy Lachenmayer, Cory Lynch, Matt Marxer, Eric Mathiason, Jason Myrlie, Benita Soller, Ray Sperl, Brent Tait, Kristie Thompson, Michelle Tibbs and Ross Vrieze as Winter Recreation Leaders. PLUMBERS INCENSES B. Licenses, Plumbers--The City Code requires that all plumbing contractors operating within the City of Eagan be licensed on at least an annual basis. Enclosed on page3 is a list of those contractors whose applications are in order for approval at this time. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the plumbers licenses as presented. LIST OF PLUMBERS TO BE APPROVED DECEMBER 1, 1992 1. COPPIN PLUMBING 2 . P & D MECHANICAL CONT. 3. RIDGEDALE PLUMBING 4 . ST. PAUL PLUMBING 5. SAUBER PLUMBING & HEATING 6. T.G.H. PLUMBING CO. 7. TIM'S QUALITY PLUMBING, INC. 3 Agenda Information Memo December 1, 1992 City Council Meeting OFF-SALE BEER LICENSE/SUPERAMERICA/CLIFF ROAD C. License, Off-Sale Beer, SuperAmerica, 2250 Cliff Road--An application has been received of Leonard Feilmeier on behalf of the above-referenced SuperAmerica store for an off-sale, non-intoxicating malt liquor license. The Police Department is in the process of conducting an investigation regarding this application; however, it has yet to be completed. Staff recommends that this item be continued to the December 15, 1992 regular City Council meeting. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To continue the off-sale beer license for SuperAmerica located at 2250 Cliff Road to the December 15, 1992 meeting. Agenda Information Memo December 1, 1992, City Council Meeting APPROVE CHANGE ORDER #1 (WELL PUMP MODIFICATIONS). D. Contract 92-03,Approve Change Order#1 (Well Pump Modifications)--This Change Order consists of four parts described as follows: Part A (Well Pump No. 7: The installation of a ground wire for existing power cable and a credit for the installation of an alternative check valve. (Add $150.00) Part B (Well Pump No. 10:) This provides for additional stainless steel bolts and the need to shorten the column pipe which was beyond the scope of the original contract for Well #10. (Add $212.00). Part C (Timberline Well Pump): During this contract, it was determined necessary and essential that the Timberline Well Pump be removed and modified similar to the other wells originally contained under this contract. The inclusion of this previous oversight would bring all the wells up to present conformance standards. This involved removal, inspection and reinstallation of the pump along with modifying various appurtenances to allow a direct connection to the north water treatment plant facility (Add $4,187.25). Part D (Well Pump No. 15): During the performance of this contract, it was determined necessary to reattach shaft sleeves in the field to expedite the reinstallation of this well pump during the summer season which resulted in an additional cost beyond the scope of the original contract (Add $444.00). All costs associated with this Change Order will be financed by the City's Utility Renewal & Replacement Fund. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: Approve Change Order #1 in the amount of $4,991.25 and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute all related documents. Agenda Information Memo December 1, 1992, City Council Meeting APPROVE FINAL PAYMENT (WELL PUMP MODIFICATIONS) E. Contract 92-03, Approve Final Payment (Well Pump Modifications)--We have received a request for final payment from the contractor for the above-referenced work along with a certification from our consulting engineer that all work was performed in conformance with the contract's plans and specifications. All work has been reviewed by representatives of the Public Works Department and found to be in order for favorable Council action. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the third and final payment for Contract 92-03 (Well Pump Modifications & Repairs) in the amount of $11,828.08 to Bergeson-Caswell, Inc., and accept the improvements for perpetual maintenance subject to warranty provisions. 6 Agenda Information Memo December 1, 1992 City Council Meeting SURPLUS PROPERTY/COUNCIL DAIS WINGS. F. Declare Surplus Property/Authorize Disposition, City Council Chambers' Dais Wing Units--Enclosed on page is a memorandum from Cable Coordinator Reardon requesting authorization to dispose of the City Council Chambers' dais wings which were replaced as a part of the audio/video renovation of the Council Chambers. As noted in the memorandum,the dais wings are extremely unique pieces of furniture with limited apparent uses. Despite this, the Dakota Civic Theatre has expressed an interest in obtaining the wings for use in their facility. Since it appears that the wings have limited financial value to any other user, the Council may wish to dispose of this property to this non-profit organization. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To declare the City Council Chambers' old dais wing units as surplus property and authorize their disposition to Dakota Civic Theatre as a donation to that organization. 7 MEMO TO: ASSISTANT TO THE CITY ADMINISTRATOR HOHENSTEIN FROM: MIRE REARDON, CABLE COORDINATOR DATE: NOVEMBER 24, 1992 SUBJECT: COUNCIL AUTHORIZATION FOR THE DECLARATION AND DISPOSITION OF SURPLUS PROPERTY Background As part of the Council Chambers renovation, the dais wings were replaced. A memorandum was distributed to all departments asking if there was interest in the old wings. There was none. The City has been notified that the Dakota Civic Theatre is interested in obtaining the wings. As the organization currently is operating on a very limited budget, it would only be able to pursue the receipt of the wings if they were donated or sold at a minimal cost. Discussion I have discussed with City Clerk VanOverbeke the City's options regarding the wings. It is our concurrence that the property is of limited value or use to the general public due to its irregular shape and function. It would also appear that it would cost the City more to try to sell them through the open bid procedure, i.e. advertising expense, staff time, etc. , than what the City could expect to receive in return. Recommendations Based on the Dakota Civic Theatre request, and staff's assumptions for the disposition of the property, the following staff recommendations are requested for Council consideration: • The Eagan City Council declare the dais wings as surplus property; and, • Staff be directed to contact Dakota Civic Theatre for the purpose of disposing of the dais wings. Closure I will await direction as determined by the City Council. In the interim, if you or they have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me. /410 Cable Coordinator MR/vmd Agenda Information Memo December 1, 1992, City Council Meeting ACKNOWLEDGE PROJECT COMPLETION/AUTHORIZE ACCEPTANCE (APPLEBEES - UTILITIES) G. Contract 92-J,Acknowledge Project Completion/Authorize Acceptance (Applebees - Utilities)--The installation of utilities and work within public right-of-way for the above- referenced development was performed privately by the developer under the terms and conditions of the development contract agreement. All work has been completed in conformance with the plans and specifications and final inspections have been performed by representatives of the Public Works Department and found to be in order for favorable Council consideration. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To acknowledge the completion of Contract 92-J (Applebees - Utilities) and accept the improvements for perpetual City maintenance subject to appropriate warranty provisions. Agenda Information Memo December 1, 1992 City Council Meeting PUBLIC RAMOS 1993 PROPERTY TAX LEVY/GENERAL FUND BUDGET/ PUBLIC ENTERPRISE FUND BUDGET A. 1993 Property Tax Levy,General Fund Budget and Public Enterprise Fund Budget--The City of Eagan has historically held public hearings to allow public input into the budget process for both the general fund and the public enterprise fund. Beginning in 1991, the Minnesota State Legislature mandated the "Truth in Taxation" process which requires that notices be sent to property owners. The notices contain certain information about market value and make a current year versus proposed year comparison of property taxes by taxing jurisdiction. In addition to the mailed notices, published notice is also required. The published notice no longer makes any mention of the size or change in the levy or budget, but simply states the time and place of the public hearing. Notices are being published in the Dakota County Tribune, ThisWeek and Sun Current newspapers. The legal requirement is publication in a newspaper of general circulation within the taxing authority. The City Council must adopt the property tax levy and the general fund budget at the conclusion of the public hearing or continue both to the continuation date of December 9, 1992. Prior to the adjournment of the public hearing, an announcement must be made as to date, time and place for the continuation hearing. The City's tax capacity rate is increasing by 8.9% from 18.411 to 20.050 given the numbers used for the truth in taxation notices. The actual change on any specific parcel depends on its current market value as well as any change in market value from 1992 to 1993. Enclosed on pages /42 through 3 0 is a copy of the material which staff has prepared to hand out at the public hearing and to use as a basis for a brief general presentation to the public. Also, enclosed on pages , 9/ and 32 is a copy of the Summary of Revenues and Expenditures for the general fund. On pagej3 is a copy of the resolution certifying the 1993 property tax levy. Also proposed for final approval is the 1993 public enterprise fund budget which consists of water, sanitary sewer, streetlighting and storm drainage divisions. A copy of the summary pages for revenues and expenses for the 1993 public enterprise fund is enclosed on pages through 3?for your review. The public enterprise fund budget is not subject to the truth in taxation process and can be handled independently of the tax levy and general fund budget. /D Agenda Information Memo December 1, 1992 City Council Meeting ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: 1)To approve the resolution authorizing the 1993 ad valorem tax levy or to continue consideration to December 9, 1992; 2) To approve the 1993 general fund budget or continue consideration to December 9, 1992; and 3) To approve or continue the 1993 public enterprise fund budget. /1 CITY OF EAGAN 1993 GENERAL FUND BUDGET AND 1993 PROPERTY TAX LEVY Public Hearing December 1, 1992 Eagan Municipal Center 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55122 BUDGET BEARING CITY OF EAGAN PROPOSED 1993 GENERAL FUND BUDGET INTRODUCTION Each year as a part of its budget preparation process, Minnesota cities, including the City of Eagan, hold public hearings to receive comments on the types and levels of service proposed to be ' provided in the coming year and the anticipated costs for those services. Over recent months, the City Council and City staff have applied their best efforts to the task of continuing to meet the public service requirements of our growing community at the lowest possible cost. Because Eagan is growing, certain services and programs must be expanded to serve our new citizens and businesses. At the same time, this growth provides new tax base which shares in the burden. The public hearing portion of the process is very important because it provides feedback on the types of City services Eagan's citizens expect and what our residents and businesses are willing to support. We expect and welcome public comment as a constructive part of the budget process. Public input, together with the City . Council 's experience and City staff's expertise help form the spending and cost management priorities for the City. TRUTH IN TAXATION As a part of the budget process, the City of Eagan annually publishes an official notice of its budget hearing and invites public participation. Recent state legislation also requires the distribution of Truth in Taxation notices to all property tax payers. In addition to the date, time and location of the budget hearings, Truth in Taxation notices indicate the anticipated property tax changes in the City, County, School District and other taxing jurisdictions. Truth in Taxation legislation is intended to enhance the public's ability to participate in the budget process by distributing basic information directly to the citizen. The information presented on the parcel specific notices shows a comparison of property taxes paid in 1992 with those proposed to be paid in 1993, if the levy and budget are approved as presented. Unfortunately, the notices cannot cover or explain the numerous factors such as state aids, fiscal disparities, classification rate changes and valuation changes which impact the amount of property taxes paid on any particular parcel of property in the City. These factors are all out of the control of the City and impact taxes more dramatically than the City's proposed levy. Many Eagan properties have been reassessed in 1992 as part of the County's ongoing effort to meet state requirements that all properties be valued at at least 95% of their fair market value. Depending upon the size of the change, the City portion of your tax bill may be more or less than it has been in the past. -2- /3 CITY OF EAGAN 1993 GENERAL FUND BUDGET In preparing the 1993 Budget, the City Council and City staff are committed to trying to maintain a constant level of the services we believe the public desires. Despite increases in population and service demand, the proposed 1993 budget includes new positions only in the Police Department. The City must now also pay sales tax on purchases as a result of state legislation. Other increases relate to the same inflationary pressures Eagan residents and businesses face. Increases in the cost of motor fuels and insurance are among these. At the same time, the City reviewed all revenue producing programs to make certain that Eagan residents continue to receive high quality services at the lowest unit cost. More details related to specific budget allocations appear in the attached charts and diagrams. The proposed 1993 General Fund Budget for the City of Eagan is $12,453,600, an increase of 7.8% over the 1992 budget of $11,557,190. Most of the 7.8% increase is personal services consisting of workers compensation, health insurance and two (2) additional police officers. ATTACHMENTS The attachments are provided to help identify and explain factors which determine the City's property tax levy and to identify the services provided by the City of Eagan and their corresponding costs. -3- / WHY IS THE CITY PORTION OF MY PROPERTY TAX BILL CHANGING? You recently received your Truth in Taxation Notice from the Dakota County Treasurer's Office. Because the State-designed notices do not explain the reasons behind increases or decreases in your property taxes, this information is presented to answer some of the most frequently asked questions concerning 1993 property tax bills. 1. How much will the City of Eagan budget change in 1993? The City's proposed General Fund Budget would increase by 7.8%from$11,557,190 to $12,453,600. This compares to a 4.6%growth in population over the past year, meaning that per capita spending has increased slightly since 1992. About 75% of the budget is supported by local property taxes. The rest is supported by license, permit and user fees, service charges, fines and forfeits and other program revenues. 2. How will the City property tax levy change for 1993? Eagan's proposed general fund levy would increase 10.9% from $8,482,760 to $9,408,700 reflecting an increasing reliance on the property tax. The balance of the levy is increasing 14.2% from $1,918,609 to $2,190,192. However, because there has been an increase in the amount of state funds received by the City,the portion of the levy composed of local property tax contributions has increased by a smaller amount. The portion of projected revenues from property taxes will increase from $8,222,551 to $9,087,979. The City tax capacity rate is increasing by 8.9%. 3. If the levy increase is so small,why did my individual taxes change more than that? Some people's taxes did increase significantly; some did not. There are three other factors which have caused your taxes to change. These factors are outside the City of Eagan's authority or control: a. State Fiscal Disparities System -- State law requires that a portion of new commercial/industrial tax revenue from cities in the metropolitan area be shared with other cities with few business properties. Therefore, a part of the property taxes paid by Eagan business and industry is taken from the City of Eagan and propor- tionately divided among other cities. Because of the way the fiscal disparities formula is computed, the amount contributed by Eagan to other cities varies from year to year. The remaining value in Eagan, including residential value, must support proportionately more of the City's budget as the value is shared. b. Change in property.tax rates on commercial and residential property -- In 1991, the State Legislature lowered property tax rates on commercial property in order to attract to and/or keep businesses in the state. It also decreased the tax rates on residential property valued over$115,000. Again,because the tax rates paid -4- by commercial and higher value residential property owners will decrease, the City will experience a decrease in revenues. Again, the remaining property value, including median-priced residential value, must support proportionately more of the City's budget next year. c. Change in assessed value — State law now requires the County Assessor to assure that all property is assessed for tax purposes at 100% of its market value. Obviously,if the assessed value of your home has increased, the amount of taxes will also increase. The combination of the above factors may result in an individual property's taxes increasing, decreasing or staying the same. The difficulty is that no single factor affects all properties in the same way. 4. Why can't the City cut its budget to keep it constant like residents or businesses? Like residents and businesses, cities are faced with cost of living increases. In addition, the state and federal governments also mandate additional services, such as the new presidential primary, without providing funds to pay for them. This makes it difficult to maintain the services the public expects at a constant dollar amount. Maintaining a constant level of service is further complicated by the fact that Eagan grew by almost 2,400 people in 1992, an increase of 4.6%. While these additional homeowners pay taxes to help support their services,their presence means that the budget cannot remain constant without decreasing service levels for everyone. The City actively uses a number of methods to cut and manage costs. Eagan works jointly with surrounding cities, Dakota County and other agencies to reduce duplications in equipment and services. The City also carefully reviews service and staffing levels each year to insure that appropriate, and not excessive, levels of service are provided. The 1993 budget attempts only to maintain a basic level of service. The only proposed staff additions are in the Police Department because of the priority the City Council and residents place upon public safety. CONCLUSION In summary, in spite of the slight proposed increase, the City levy is only keeping pace with population growth and inflation. Also,Eagan's municipal tax rates remain among the lowest in Dakota County and among the lowest in the metropolitan area. The majority of the changes on Truth in Taxation Notices are a result of factors beyond the City of Eagan's control. Property tax rates are set by the State Legislature, as are assessment valuation requirements and the fiscal disparities program. The City of Eagan has and will continue to manage spending to control the part of the tax system it can. Together with our residents, we will share with our legislators the concerns these state policies raise for our City. -5- /6 ESTIMATED 1993 PROPERTY TAXES PERCENT OF TOTAL TAX SCHOOL DISTRICT #196 SCHOOL DISTRICT 54.7% 03.4%R COUNTY 23.8% CITY 18.1% /7 -6- 1992 LEVY $10, 401 , 369 LOCAL TAXPAYERS �II $8,222,551 ;u A C DISPAF I S RITL IES • $858,345 34 II� H ACA $1,320,473 1993 LEVY $11 , 598 , 892 LOCAL TAXPAYERS (I $9,087,979 i „i III FI S A C L DI S PA RITI ES $951,048 H ACA $1,559,865 -7- 1992 TAX BASE $57 , 501 , 814 AVAILABLE TO RAISE LOCAL TAXES $44,663,062 1111 77 .7% TAX INCREMENT 830 033 1.4% FISCAL DISPARITIES $12,008,719 Ili 20.9% 1993 TAX BASE $57 , 333 , 895 AVAILABLE TO RAISE LOCAL TAXES $45,327,124 , 79 .1% ` II TAX INCREMENT $851,111 3 1.5% FISCAL DISPARITIES k $11,155,658 19.4% /r -8- CITY TAX CAPACITY RATE CALCULATIONS 1992 $ 8,222,551 = .18411 $44,663,062 1993 $ 9,087,979 = .20050 $45,327,124 C -9- USE OF 1992 LEVY $ 10 , 401 , 369 GENERAL • e,.s. OPER '^fll sr co °sra DEBT SERVICE 14.8% USE OF 1993 LEVY $11 , 598 . 892 oPEA :s.,oe,,eo ...:,...,./.4w7... ---:::::::: lit / ST MAJOR DEBT SERVICE EQUIP REVOLVING e2/ 0.7% ALLOCATION OF CITY SHARE OF ESTIMATED 1993 PROPERTY TAX EQUIP DEBT REVOLVING 11.0% 0.5% MAJ STREET CONSTRUCT GEN GOVT 3.4% 23.6% PUBLIC L C SAFETY ETY P UB I L C 34.7% WOR 13.9% OTHER PARKS 0.3% 12.6% -11- Estimated Cost of City Services Pay 1993 Property Tax Supported City Service Percent Amount Category of Levy of Levy General Government Mayor & Council Administration Data Processing Finance/City Clerk 23.6% $ 70 Legal Community Development Cable TV Public Safety Police 34.7% $103 Fire Public Works Public Works/Engineering Streets & Highways 13.9% $ 41 Central Services Maint. Parks & Recreation Parks & Recreation 12.6% $ 37 Forestry Other Contingency .3% $ 1 Debt Service 11.0% $ 33 Equipment Revolving .5% $ 2 Major Street Construction 3.4% $ 10 Totals 100.0% $297 Based on a house with a 1/1/92 market value of $110,000 -12- 093 1993 SUMMARY OF REVENUE GENERAL FUND $12,453,600 GEN PROPERTY TAX 85.2% nnuUluIII1111:i,.ii,aii•i.i.i.!I i' _.:;IIIIIIIIIIIP' 5. j/ OTHER %j 1.7% FINES 1.2% RECREATION SERVICES LICENSES 4.4% 0.7% PERMITS 5.5% TRANFERS - INTERGOVT REVENUE 0.9% 12.1% PROGRAM S REVENUES 8.4% a -13- 93REVSUM GENERAL FUND 23-Nov-92 COMPARATIVE SUMMARY OF REVENUES Original Adjusted Actual Actual Budget Budget Estimate Description 1990 1991 1992 7-31-92 1993 General Property Taxes S 6,358,069 S 6,520,602 S 7,403,980 S 7,403,980 $ 8,121,500 Licenses 77,255 88,081 84,550 84,550 94,800 Permits 837,512 864,435 599,000 599,000 680,900 Intergovernmental Revenue 1,363,938 1,019,728 1,290,840 1,290,840 1,512,200 Charges for Services 627,745 784,241 '622,820 622,820 547,200 Recreation Charges 179,328 222,985 213,070 213,070 232,000 Fines & Forfeits 223,424 177,202 216,000 216,000 150,000 Other Revenue 216,687 328,273 248,120 250,320 208,300 Program Revenues 733,979 839,132 772,050 772,050 794,900 Transfers 66,939 122,310 76,660 104,560 111,800 TOTAL GENERAL FUND $10,684,876 $10,966,989 $11,527,090 $11,557,190 $12,453,600 IS -14- 1993 SUMMARY OF EXPENDITURES GENERAL FUND OTHER 0.3% 14.8% GENERAL GOVT ■ x7,8% " PUBLIC WK PUBLIC SAFETY 16.4% 40.7% a6 93BUDEXP . GENERAL FUND 23-Nov-92 COMPARATIVE SUMMARY OF EXPENDITURES Actual Actual Budget Dept Request Amin Recam 1990 1991 1992 1993 1993 GENERAL GOVERNMENT 01 Mayor & Council S 63,157 .$ 73,465 $ 84,260 $ 77,800 S 80,800 02 Administration 408,435 423,988 473,450 506,600 512,400 03 Data Processing 263,707 235,131 358,650 438,000 332,500 05 Finance/City Clerk 623,430 , 695,456 763,490 766,700 758,200 06 Legal 365,137 • 306,526 370,000 370,000 370,000 07 Community Development 1,103,559 1,231,025 1,262,330 1,538,100 1,339,100 10 Cable TV 46,571 52,943 61,980 65,400 65,400 . 2,873,996 3,018,534 3,374,160 3,762,600 3,458,400 PUBLIC SAFETY 11 Police 2,973,831 3,414,904 3,835,240 4,414,000 4,330,700 12 Fire 630,193 646,176 667,000 709,200 744,100 3,604,024 4,061,080 4,502,240 5,123,200 5,074,800 PUBLIC WORKS 21 Public Works Engineering 655,335 682,433 729,400 797,100 775,500 22 Streets & Highways 775,000 835,855 819,120 1,201,600 882,900 24 Central Services Maintenance 285,599 320,317 345,340 437,900 381,500 1,715,934 1,838,605 1,893,860 2,436,600 2,039,900 PARKS & RECREATION 31 Parks & Recreation 1,336,154 1,451,788 1,626,090 1,931,500 1,716,500 32 Forestry 96,950 95,936 110,840 138,400 124,000 1,433,104 1,547,724 1,736,930 2,069,900 1,840,500 OTHER 41 Contingency - - 50,000 0 • 40,000 - - 50,000 0 40,000 TOTAL GENERAL FUND EXPENDITURES S 9,627,058 $10,465,943 $11,557,190 $13,392,300 $12,453,600 _=__=___==_ __==__=ma___ mum____: :su=ss=====s u=z=s=__ -16- a7 I In es e U N a fa fa 4f, fa N eq NI ■ C - - ., te 4.1 6 A v vp O = - `t NN �D O R. w w 3. w A gilt I G, et ca IEH � on cts 00 v■I 00 CD A 1 " in c N Eg I Q S VD I i get es a e 1 o Ea fa fa 0 a A c� zw 1 as a ‘.1 00 t7 D1 S N 0 In n 04 l e I rj w 0 "O is 8 E & &N . try CD Lu0 wall r^ w 8 ._17_ �° I �° 1 * 1 a 00 ad Q 1 00 ! Os r1 v 1 h .0 1 ; 1 t+1 y 1as % 4 , V) a w :. iA iR iA iA iA JO 1.0 VD E 1 � W 4, au S e� aY in R n 6 in - ;T O '" A Z x O - U COD�o Oo I fA C i pp pp .4 � � gg pep� 000p0pp00p0p eneN.iNN bvOierer �o�ot∎!PN ONOnaN __. iA iR fA fR 6A fA fA K i~A i4� in in in in in iNA tn..' iR f%in in E; ....1 C4 o ,-4Ne) wi Ne7 v.* c4 � aa re r41 - - - - - - - - E t, t t - a - a - - aa - - - - 1 E 1 . , 1 Iri -18- ,„,2y WHAT WOULD YOUR CITY PROPERTY TAX BE IF YOU LIVED IN ANOTHER CITY? Property Value % Higher (Less) Dakota County Cities $80,000 $100,000 $120.000 than Eagan Eagan $176 $257 $337 -- Apple Valley 217 316 415 23% Burnsville 176 255 335 0 Hastings 255 371 487 45% Inver Grove Heights 211 306 402 19% Lakeville 184 267 351 4% Mendota Heights 184 268 352 4% Rosemount 275 400 525 56% South St. Paul 233 338 444 32% West St. Paul 188 274 360 7% Other Cities Bloomington 201 293 384 14% Brooklyn Park 201 293 384 14% Eden Prairie 227 331 434 29% Maple Grove 227 331 434 29% Minnetonka 181 263 345 3% Plymouth 153 222 292 (13%) Woodbury 191 278 365 8% Coon Rapids 144 210 276 (18%) Includes City taxes only and is based on 1993 estimates used for truth in taxation notices. '50 -19- - 93REVSUM GENERAL FUND 23-Nov-92 COMPARATIVE SUMMARY OF REVENUES Original Adjusted Actual Actual Budget Budget Estimate Description 1990 1991 1992 7-31-92 1993 General Property Taxes $ 6,358,069 S 6,520,602 S 7,403,980 S 7,403,980 $ 8,121,500 Licenses 77,255 88,081 84,550 84,550 94,800 Permits 837,512 864,435 599,000 599,000 680,900 Intergovernmental Revenue 1,363,938 1,019,728 1,290,840 1,290,840 1,512,200 Charges for Services 627,745 784,241 622,820 622,820 547,200 Recreation Charges 179,328 222,985 213,070 213,070 232,000 Fines & Forfeits 223,424 177,202 216,000 216,000 150,000 Other Revenue 216,687 328,273 248,120 250,320 208,300 Program Revenues 733,979 839,132 772,050 772,050 794,900 Transfers 66,939 122,310 76,660 104,560 111,800 TOTAL GENERAL FUND $10,684,876 $10,966,989 $11,527,090 $11,557,190 $12,453,600 1 3/ 93BUDEXP _ GENERAL FUND 23-Nov-92 COMPARATIVE SUMMARY OF EXPENDITURES Actual Actual Budget Dept Request Admin Recom 1990 1991 1992 1993 1993 GENERAL GOVERNMENT 01 Mayor & Council $ 63,157 .8 73,465 $ 84,260 $ 77,800 $ 80,800 02 Administration 408,435 423,988 473,450 506,600 512,400 03 Data Processing 263,707 235,131 358,650 438,000 332,500 05 Finance/City Clerk 623,430 695,456 763,490 766,700 758,200 06 Legal 365,137 306,526 370,000 370,000 370,000 07 Community Development 1,103,559 1,231,025 1,262,330 1,538,100 1,339,100 10 Cable TV 46,571 52,943 61,980 65,400 65,400 2,873,996 3,018,534 3,374,160 3,762,600 3,458,400 PUBLIC SAFETY 11 Police 2,973,831 3,414,904 3,835,240 4,414,000 4,330,700 12 Fire 630,193 646,176 667,000 709,200 744,100 3,604,024 4,061,080 4,502,240 5,123,200 5,074,800 PUBLIC WORKS 21 Public Works Engineering 655,335 682,433 729,400 797,100 775,500 22 Streets & Highways 775,000 835,855 819,120 1,201,600 882,900 24 Central Services Maintenance 285,599 320,317 345,340 437,900 381,500 1,715,934 1,838,605 1,893,860 2,436,600 2,039,900 PARKS & RECREATION 31 Parks & Recreation 1,336,154 1,451,788 1,626,090 1,931,500 1,716,500 32 Forestry 96,950 95,936 110,840 138,400 124,000 1,433,104 1,547,724 1,736,930 2,069,900 1,840,500 OTHER 41 Contingency - - 50,000 0 ' 40,000 - - 50,000 0 40,000 TOTAL GENERAL FUND EXPENDITURES $ 9,627,058 810,465,943 $11,557,190 $13,392,300 $12,453,600 sasssassaass sssasaasassa assasaassaaa ssaasszasass ssarssasasm 3.2 RESOLUTION CITY OF EAGAN LEVY OF 1993 REAL ESTATE TAXES WHEREAS, a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Eagan, Dakota County, Minnesota, was held on December 1, 1992 at 6:30 p.m. at the Eagan Municipal Center, all members being present except , and WHEREAS, upon motion by Councilmember , and seconded by Councilmember NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Eagan, Dakota County,Minnesota, hereby is on record approving and certifying the levy of 1993 Real Estate Taxes for Eagan,Minnesota,which taxes are payable in 1993 as follows: General Levy: General Fund $9,408,700 Major Street Fund 499,245 Equipment Revolving Fund 76.947. TOTAL GENERAL LEVY $9,984,892 Special Levies: Debt Service $1,614,000 TOTAL SPECIAL LEVIES $1.614.000 GRAND TOTAL LEVY $11,598,892 Dated: December 1. 1992 CITY COUNCIL CITY OF EAGAN BY: Al LEST: CERTIFICATION I, E.J. VanOverbeke, Clerk of the City of Eagan, Dakota County, Minnesota, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted by the City council of the City of Eagan, Dakota County, Minnesota, in a regular meeting thereof assembled this 1st day of December,.1992. E.J. VanOverbeke, City Clerk City of Eagan 33 N P W H g Z t<7 W Ch 2 g .. M N N l■ 0C 2 Qpppp..... O F s- N W •• W W S pp. at H O N J P F O W CA 0 0 3 ppi, G O. W C ea' P O r P M N 0 0 0 p0 0 0 0 0 0 0 W W M .O N 0 Z &141 N 0 CO O pN p P N E 0 3 1 Al M 0 v F. s O CO M y N CO �O CO in a0 CO N c.„, ,O 1� r y 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 N W y� PO PP a 0 - 0 0 0 f� 0 ill co 0 N O` N M A O 6" o in r P H O IF Z 2 = W N s Y y J P P N o Op A 6 a .~.. y r < .p .IpA O 0 N p. W O W O. a 3 P r A a0 6 r M N y = i.— W O'� < '0 N - CO �O CO OAO M p W N IA ft IF i.l CO J CO &` 6 N. a N pOp CO CO e- O O A A 0. •O �t P .O N FO 0 V IF < P M P N Y1 O O M A •O r N O CO W CO �y� CO W i LU CO M se I- ii IF 2 W ~ /Y I- CO Z > W 0 IF 0 `-�'�, = r e[ tr H d N I I 0 _ A. 0 CA W .W.. ►- 0 y V N J _ N W < 2 ,- CC pC 2 J W y Y J or= N O. V a LL W H m = W F. N A. 0 0 0 2 Z W W W W W W W W N I- Nit y2j W < <F. < < J J < s < 3 3 O 3 3 3 3 W W N N N W • Al in S Ni) CO P O — N M V 0 i ►� A P < it M M M M M M M in in in M M 3 4.71 P N N O O 0 O pm 0 z < W 0 pp�� pp�� 8 1^ N A N 2 P M N C • 0 0 F• O O I- N 0 Y1 N N H W O N J pp 0 p up 0 �Ky W .O N 0 3 M .6 N p& N N s- I $ 0Op H W O O s & s r N pappp a 0N. IA N 0 — 1p`� 00 0. . 0 00 —O A 2 M P N ti A .t v M Y 00 N -. 10 M .O M N W O O 1!1 O O O O O O O O O. CO r O� N O O N e-N O v .S O S O r .t P I- 0 W 2 W 3 2 = U. AC CA pY� M V! — Q v a e- �O a �O N 1n W O W Q 7 •O O M PP 1� M in IL. •-■ {2y cvA. 0 0 00 N .t — .0 I, t 1Wp9 2 W . S _ 7 u OC I, 61 m J M S J P O O O P O O O O N M A. p p _ N O r 0 p, H ti 0.▪ C. P M N 0 1,N 1 2 )- 0 I- H. < U 2 2 ►- < 2 2 yj J _ U 2p fi 2 W �C N 2 g GI wr .~.. U N OOC CCD N W �j W W W 0. GC 2 = N 2 2 {Y — ~ 22.. < A. W W .Or 0 > 2 2 AO !- N 2 1- J 2 C O H d 2 O. g C 8 a1 111 J J a «O 2 - 0 � N 3 W N W W OL CA O O J 2 < W N m N N N 0 N d N 2 I.• O r N U1 .O .1.0 N 0 OC 0 2 • .Mt .t E V ^ ti A O M P < • M M M M M M M M M M 3.5.- N pp N P W Y O pQ N _ = M O p .�`ppr 0.IA N~ _p. N N e'er II N 4. y p P Al O N N N I- 8 N W H CO 0 N W X H a pipn. yyo� N N co _, 0. N N d N so O N WK W 0 0 N CC N s Mp. CO N II 1- N P r o 11 CO °N N W "' N II g r o— O to WW o O►- N s t In y 11 0 0 43 N N * N c 0 ° & R'i 0 o ° eS �N°o 2 ° O v; ii on pp 1. CO N p, `* no 2 A i N 'Cr Al N '4 N N 1— O O O O O O pO O O O N &` QC' 0 0 0 8 C 0 0 0 0 1 sr 7 0 CO. V- N CO IA � Al W 0 _ f` A N CO N t2 x n. A 8 U' Y Y 0 a O 0 0 1 0 O .t 0 O N U. § I. N Z � `' " 0 IA N a 4, V Y 619 ' � t IN N INri N N oN 1_ fp .. Of N V m co N , 0 M ° O O 0 0 .. O ° N srb N M O II i N3 N N N .. N N .o N . N .O N N Y Ch J H d Z 2 Y Y Cr CN W I- O K ~ ~ K Y d W V W H F ^ N < V 2 d CO) C 3. 3 z tx.1 CO ex I— g .~. 7 c CC W W W W K Of W H yVj �W„ ' W W 2 2 W W 2 N .2. .2.. W H 3 O O I- N7 O N D. W 1.. I r o CN on V i CAD CO N OD . CO W N t / M M M M M NI M M MMMin M M 36 PUBLIC UTILITIES - COMPARATIVE SUMMARY OF EXPENDITURES ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET BUDGET 1990 1991 1992 1993 OPERATIONS WATER Personal Services $ 271,728 $ 319,946 $ 339,700 $ 404,400 Parts & Supplies 106,201 180,503 193,110 274,100 Services & Other Charges 610,994 705,794 858,500 1,116,900 SANITARY SEWER Personal Services 132,645 246,904 292,610 347,600 Parts & Supplies 23,899 31,235 28,830 38,900 Services & Other Charges 179,643 196,885 222,040 243,100 MWCC Service Charge 2,010,551 2,092,806 2,313,780 2,341,000 STREET LIGHTING Services & Other Charges 84,135 129,309 208,110 274,100 STORM DRAINAGE Personal Services 58,757, 55,893 77,160 96,000 Parts & Supplies 1,574 37,374 72,510 42,500 Services & Other Charges 77,069 182,372 192,230 224,100 TOTAL OPERATION EXPEND BEFORE DEPRECIATION $3,557,196 $4,179,021 $4,798,580 $5,402,700 NON-OPERATIONS Capital Outlay & $ $ • $ $ Inter-Fund Transfers Water (Incl. Meters) * * 143,250 1,082,650 Sanitary Sewer * * 53,300 548,200 Storm Drainage * * 2,800 45,200 Bond Payment Principal 150,000 250,000 250,000 350,000 Interest 558,470 1,130,118 1,053,990 1,027,800 TOTAL OPERATING & NON-OPERATING EXPEND. BEFORE DEPRECIATION $4,265,666 $5,559,139 $6,301,920 $8,456,550 DEPRECIATION EXPENSE 1,181,751 1,244,627 1,227,000 1,400,000 TOTAL INC. DEPRECIATION $5,447,417 $6,803,766 $7,528,920 $9,856,550 *Expenditures Recorded in Fixed Assets at Year End Agenda Information Memo December 1, 1992, City Council Meeting ST THOMAS BECKETT B. Project 640,St.Thomas Beckett (Streets&Utilities)--On November 5, the feasibility report for the above-referenced improvement was presented to the City Council and a public hearing was scheduled for December 1. Enclosed on pages 347 through ,Sg is a copy of that report for the Council's reference and review during the public hearing presentation to be provided by representatives of the consulting engineering firm of Short, Elliott, Hendrickson, Inc., who prepared the feasibility report and City staff. All notices have been published in the legal newspaper and sent to all potentially affected property owners informing them of this public hearing. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To close the public hearing and approve/deny Project 640 (St. Thomas Beckett - Streets & Utilities) and, if approved, authorize the preparation of detailed plans and specifications. 3g Report for City of Eagan Minnesota St. Thomas Beckett Addition City Project No. 640 SEH File No. 93144 November 13, 1992 r C1-11 1 Ilt 3 ? • i I hereby certify that this report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision, and that I am a duly Registered Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. ' / • 411111.4.- / ' Al. ti II Date: November 1 , 1992 Re_. N. • 94dy Reviewed by: T ./..:. / / I I t,c(iq 7-- Pu•lic or Depart ent Date Reviewed by: — A 1.v Reviewed ij `I - , 5 LW Fii ce Department Date 0 November 13, 1992 RE: Eagan,Minnesota St. Thomas Beckett Development City Project No.640 SEH File No. 93144 Honorable Mayor and City Council City of Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan,Minnesota 55121 Attn: Thomas Colbert, Director of Public Works Attached is our report for the St.Thomas Beckett Addition.The report presents the utility improvements and access requirements onto Trunk Highway 3. Cost estimates are included in the report. We will be pleased to meet with you at your convenience to discuss this report. Sincerely, Leonard C. Newquist,P.E. LCN:Ilc Enclosure II I Table of Contents Certification Page Letter of Transmittal Table of Contents Page Scope 1 Feasibility and Recommendations 1 Figure 1 2 Utilities 3 Storm Sewer 3 Watermain 3 Sanitary Sewer 3 Trunk Highway 3 Access 4 Easements 4 Permits 4 Cost Estimate 5 Assessments 5 Revenue Source 5 Project Schedule 6 Appendix A- Preliminary Cost Estimates Appendix B- Preliminary Assessment Roll Figure 2-Storm Sewer and Watermain Figure 3-Sanitary Sewer Figure 4-Trunk Highway 3 Access City of Eagan St. Thomas Beckett Addition Lt. Page i Scope St. Thomas Beckett Addition is located in the Northeast 1/4, Southeast 1/4, Section 25, Township 27, Range 23, one-quarter mile north of Cliff Road as shown on Figure No. 1. Trunk Highway 3 crosses the easterly portion of the property, in a north-south direction. Railroad right-of-way is located east of and adjacent to the Highway right-of-way. The property west of the highway is identified as Lot 1,Block 1,and the narrow sliver of land east of the railroad tracks is identified as an outlot.The development proposed at this time is on Lot 1, Block 1, and consists of a church building, site grading, and parking lot construction. Development of the outlot is not proposed at this time. Lot 1, Block 1 is bounded on the west by Lakeside Estates and Hay Lake,on the north by Autumn Ridge, on the east by Trunk Highway 3,and on the south by undeveloped land. This project consists of the construction of a storm water pond outlet, sanitary sewer extension, watermain extension and access to Trunk Highway 3. Feasibility and Recommendations The project is feasible from an engineering standpoint and is in accordance with the objectives established in the City's Comprehensive Utility Plan. The project can best be carried out as one contract. City of Eagan St.Thomas Beckett Addition 3 Page 1 R _......, I• T wOOO --..,. N GREA1 gt\ „„ .., 1 ..1L;) JIJ .OR. L H LN.• u c 3 3600_ iCxE�? W •Y war t` '�l , 4 ''�iy/.' , ' w ` FALCON wP �� IM. ^S', C c+ _ ... J .NINC1. 1 t �.%:../[-���� - I. ��.. �, :ovE ` SW .�ic"1YIlIR:••' �''. t o 3 Q' S 90UTN LLS •, ' • T'E_ C, 1y 1. Y CFT- : - LA CI E; ` ����I�!pj�' 6 TREK �� 9 • _ �`�FJ ,' IL E. r,L ,, ;. O A -, -al k E.F., 'it• . Et 1.! ' A.-4 a '''.11 sr( - ` I-I S T. 'MC4 4 11!1'41 IL L44 4 244: . ' -..';'''..;' CNC i' f a NE``i F�/ Kal � <q-‘:. , I -.,- . ..'*li 7 i 11-I Li 1411* -111.1111 k. ...V.144 . , tr . % � �� _.511* 44. '11: .,./ " . ,,,,�, a • y. �= �/ n .I I 55 ` jj}$� 'a--.. ♦c CI • ; hi ` O Co. R0. No_• - aFfLEr �I ' 'i1 ` ® ® • lit\ ) et __.,.. 4i,=-,,,,,. pi ., , ), '1 f I� �_ L 1 -• - I Nem!Y lam_ Imo . • ar:►>rl Rio.ill!, `". 43 ---■ ' .01 IFF44,17410 kiti je. •I,* .2......_ FT fillr'i \I lq' ',,,,r--;' ''*.r ,,....MV P—......:::. ' cool {.,..PP SW 3' wA . SE.. 7� y ,,,l,....._,...„.....:.::.,-��I,cAll 'jf=` ! L1 44-7- t. 1 ,,,,itk " 1&R ,�� u_ ' �. , THE, IO. , , -116'..nt ce. — - ,� �1��. N iliadri ,-, P� 4 .1, 1 1 ic`4 t :ry l ' 'ib -+,{.E ;3 '\ F»:y£� i i �L11o0. ' l• ;- x .ia s i II ' r• PARK 7 , a � 1 PROJECT LO CAT i O N ...5-72- :-. � r v ` - ;t -ii '' e r iam ' 4r _•• - . \�1 , .4., BUTW/N y 111i w ;•• zt y , .. •j SE GUN e«� rt � "';Y >� r . SE r ---"f-� _ i t� 12 •vt .. ROAD ,' ;_ __ PROD. NO. 640 LOCATION MAP Arsai FILE NO ST. THOMAS BECKET CHURCH 93144 EAGAN, MINNESOTA NE ENCINEERS 1 ARCHITECTS I PLANNERS 14 I/ Utilities Storm Sewer The proposed storm sewer is shown on Figure 2.This facility consists of an outlet for Pond LP-47,the pond that storm water from this development will discharge into. Pond LP-47 is a two-cell facility with the northerly cell located on the St.Thomas Beckett property(Lot 1, Block 1) and the southerly cell located on the undeveloped property south of and adjacent to Lot 1, Block 1.The receiving facility for Pond LP-47 is Pond LP-31,Hay Lake. Hay Lake is identified in the Eagan Water Quality Management Plan as one of the City's 17 Class II lakes. A two cell pond is needed to achieve and maintain the desired water quality of Hay Lake.The Development Plan for the St.Thomas Beckett property proposes a two cell pond on their property. Construction of the outlet over Lot 1,Block 1 from the northerly cell of Pond LP-47 will meet the City's water quality standards provided that the southerly cell,located on presently undeveloped property is left in its natural state. Pond LP-47 receives 36 acres of direct runoff and 218 acres of ponded runoff for a total tributary area of 254 acres. The storage volume of Pond LP-47 is 13.5 acre feet with a normal water elevation of 908.0 feet and a high water level elevation of 910.6 feet and a controlled outflow of 1.2 cfs. Watermain The proposed watermain is shown on Figure 2, and will be installed adjacent to the proposed roadways. An 8-inch watermain is proposed to provide water service to the proposed development and provide a trunk watermain facility in accordance with the City's Comprehensive Water Distribution System Plan. An 8-inch extension is proposed to provide future water service to the property east of Trunk Highway 3. The location of the southerly extension is proposed to cause the least interruption to future development south of the St. Thomas Beckett development. One other alignment proposed ment was considered for the ro osed watermain location.The alignment considered was adjacent to Trunk Highway 3 between the southerly church entrance and the south property line of Lot 1, Block 1. This alignment was discarded because of the need to fill a portion of Pond LP-47 for this facility. Also,area between Trunk Highway 3 and Pond LP-47 is relatively narrow and watermain maintenance will be difficult. Sanitary Sewer The proposed sanitary sewer extension is shown on Figure 3. An 8-inch gravity sewer is proposed to be constructed between Trunk Highway 3 and the railroad tracks.This sewer will connect to the existing Cliff Road trunk sewer and will require jacking under Trunk Highway 3 to serve the St. Thomas Beckett property. A portion of the ditch,as shown on Figure 3,requires filling in order to construct and maintain cover over the gravity sewer. Also, the storm sewer shown on Figure 3 must be installed in order to maintain the existing storm drainage to Pond LP-47. The costs of the fill and storm sewer facilities is included in the sanitary sewer cost estimates. The City's Comprehensive Plan proposes serving the St. Thomas Beckett development from the Cliff Road trunk sewer. This City of Eagan Page 3 St.Thomas Beckett Addition �� sanitary sewer extension as proposed will provide future service to the property east of the railroad tracks lying northerly of Ponds LP-30 and LP-67. Two other alignment extensions from the Cliff Road trunk sewer were reviewed in this study phase. The first was along a future roadway alignment over the southerly undeveloped property. This alignment resulted in depth cuts of approximately 50 feet and will require easement acquisition for its installation and maintenance. The second alignment was along the westerly Trunk Highway 3 right-of-way.This alignment resulted in the need to fill a portion of Pond LP-47 in order to construct and maintain cover over the gravity sewer. Both of these alignment extensions were discarded from further consideration because of the difficulties listed Eight-inch lateral extensions at 0.40 percent grade from the Cliff Road trunk sewer will not provide gravity service to the St. Thomas Beckett Church at the building elevation proposed. An alternative method of providing sewer service is the installation of a private system that discharges into the Atlantic Hill Drive sanitary sewer. This system would be owned, operated, and installed by the church. The sewer system will consist of a pump facility and forcemain. This alternative will not provide for future service to the property east of the railroad tracks. The existing sewer in Atlantic Hill Drive is limited to the capacity of the section of 8-inch sewer pipe placed at a 0.10 percent grade. This sewer will provide service to the properties adjacent to Atlantic Hill Drive and also the St. Thomas Beckett property.The Atlantic Hills Drive sewer does not have sufficient capacity to serve the area east of the railroad tracks. Trunk Highway 3 Access The proposed widening of Trunk Highway 3 for turning lanes servicing the two St. Thomas Beckett entrances is shown on Figure 4. The layout conforms to the Mn/DOT preliminary review done in September 1992. Mn/DOT review requires a 660-foot separation between the two entrances.The section proposed for the roadway widening is shown on Figure 4 and is based on an assumed soil R value of 22, a 1993 Average Daily Traffic(ADT) of 10,640, and a projected 2013 ADT of 19,217. A final roadway section will be done based on actual soil values. Easements Easements will be required for the watermain installation on St.Thomas Beckett property, Lot 1, Block 1, and for the storm sewer outlet.The following is a tabulation and estimate of the easement areas required. Parcel Identification Easement Width Area Sq. Ft. NE 1/4, SE 1/4 Sec. 25 010-75 (Watermain) 10' 21,000 010-75 (Storm Sewer) 20' 4,600 City of Eagan St.Thomas Beckett Addition f Page 4 Permits The following regulatory agency permits will be needed: 1. Minnesota Department of Health -Watermain extension. 2. Minnesota Pollution Control Agency and Metropolitan Waste Control Commission -Sanitary sewer extension. 3. Soo Line Railroad -Work on Railroad right-of-way (sanitary sewer) 4. Minnesota Department of Transportation -Trunk highway widening -Sanitary sewer extension Cost Estimate Detailed cost estimates are located in Appendix A located in the back of this report and are summarized below: Storm sewer $16,500 Watermain 80,500 Sanitary sewer 158,000 T.H. 3 access 213,100 Total $468,100 The estimated project cost includes contingencies and indirect costs. Indirect costs are estimated at 30 percent and include legal,engineering,administrative,and bond interest. These estimates do not reflect any easement acquisition costs. Assessments Assessments will be based on final construction costs plus related indirect expenses, estimated to be 30 percent of the construction cost and all costs associated with easement and right-of-way acquisition. The assessments will be spread over a fifteen (15) year period with the interest rate determined by the results of the bond sale. All of the costs for this improvement, except the storm sewer costs, are proposed to be assessed to the St. Thomas Beckett Church property,Parcel 010-75, NE 1/4, SE 1/4, Sec. 25.The storm sewer cost will be paid from the City's Trunk Storm Sewer Fund. Revenue Source All of the costs for this improvement are proposed to be assessed in accordance with current City policy. City of Eagan St.Thomas Beckett Addition Page 5 Project Schedule Present Report November 5, 1992 Public Hearing December 1, 1992 Approve Plans and Specifications Winter 1993 Award Contract/Construction Spring 1993 Complete Construction Summer 1993 - Assessment Hearing Fall 1993 First Payment Due with Real Estate Taxes May 1994 t City of Eagan g St.Thomas Beckett Addition Page 6 Appendix A Preliminary Cost Estimates St. Thomas Beckett City Project 640 Project No. 640 Storm Sewer Description Unit Est. Qty. Unit Price Amount Mobilization L.S. 1 450.00 $450.00 Skimmer Control Structure Each 1 1,750.00 1,750.00 12" RC Pipe Apron Each 1 350.00 350.00 12" RC Pipe Sewer Des. 3006,Cl. V L.F. 304 19.50 5,920.00 Random Riprap,Cl. II C.Y. 3 100.00 300.00 Silt Fence,Preassembled L.F. 100 2.00 200.00 Common Borrow C.Y. 290 4.50 1,305.00 - Clearing and Grubbing L.S. 1 750.00 $750.00 Turf Restoration L.S. 1 500.00 500.00 Subtotal $11,533.00 Plus 10% Contingencies 1.153.00 Estimated Construction Cost 12,686.00 Plus 30% Legal, Administrative, Engineering & Bond Interest 3.814.00 Total Estimated Cost $16,500.00 • City of Eagan Appendix A St.Thomas Beckett Addition SO Page A-1 Project No. 640 Watermain Description Unit Est. Qty. Unit Price Amount Mobilization L.S. 1 2,680.00 2,680.00 Salvage Existing Hydrant Each 1 300.00 300.00 Install Salvaged Hydrant Each 1 300.00 300.00 6" Gate Valve and Box Each 4 380.00 1,520.00 8" Gave Valve and Box Each 6 450.00 2,700.00 Hydrant Each 4 1,000.00 4,000.00 2" Corporation Each 1 90.00 90.00 2" Curb Stop and Box Each 1 150.00 150.00 Connect to Existing Watermain Each 2 400.00 800.00 6" DIP Watermain,Cl. 52 L.F. 82 15.00 1,230.00 8" DIP Watermain,Cl. 52 L.F. 2,110 18.00 37,980.00 2" Copper Service L.F. 10 20.00 200.00 Fittings Lb. 975 2.40 2,340.00 Turf Restoration L.S. 1 2,000.00 2,000.00 Subtotal $56,290.00 Plus 10% Contingencies 5.629.00 Estimated Construction Cost $61,919.00 Plus 30% Legal, Administrative, Engineering & Bond Interest 18.581.00 Total Estimated Cost $80,500.00 City of Eagan Appendix A St.Thomas Beckett Addition / Page A-2,...c Project No. 640 Sanitary Sewer Description Unit Est. Qty. Unit Price Amount Mobilization L.S. 1 4,975.00 4,975.00 Clearing and Grubbing L.S. 1 1,000.00 1,000.00 Common Borrow C.Y. 7,000 4.50 31,500.00 Topsoil Borrow C.Y. 250 6.50 1,625.00 Granular Bedding Ton 75 15.00 1,125.00 Construct Manhole Over Each 1 1,750.00 1,750.00 Existing Pipe Standard Sanitary Manhole Each 6 1,200.00 7,200.00 8' w/casting Excess Depth Sanitary Manhole L.F. 19 95.00 1,805.00 8" PVC SDR 26 L.F. 400 22.00 8,800.00 Jack Service Pipe L.F. 60 100.00 6,000.00 8" PVC SDR 35 L.F. 1,400 20.00 28,000.00 18" RC Pipe Apron Each 2 450.00 900.00 18" RC Pipe Sewer, Cl. III L.F. 20 20.00 400.00 24" RC Pipe Apron Each 2 600.00 1,200.00 24" RC Pipe Sewer,Cl. III L.F. 32 26.00 832.00 24" RC Pipe Sewer-Jacked L.F. 64 150.00 9,600.00 Abandon Existing Culvert Each 1 800.00 800.00 Random Riprap,Cl. III C.Y. 6 50.00 300.00 Traffic Control L.S. 1 800.00 800.00 Silt Fence,Preassembled L.F. 200 2.00 400.00 Bale Check Each 30 5.00 150.00 Turf Restoration L.S. 1 1,300.00 1,300.00 Subtotal $110,464.00 Plus 10% Contingencies 11.046.00 Estimated Construction Cost $121,510.00 Plus 30% Legal, Administrative, Engineering & Bond Interest 36.490.00 Total Estimated Cost $158,000.00 City of Eagan Appendix A St.Thomas Beckett Addition Page A-3 Project No. 640 Trunk Highway 3 Access Description Unit Est. Qty. Unit Price Amount Mobilization L.S. 1 7,000.00 7,000.00 Common Excavation C.Y. 4,500 4.00 18,000.00 , Common Borrow C.Y. 1,500 6.00 9,000.00 Select Topsoil Borrow C.Y. 1,100 7.00 7,700.00 Aggregate Base,Cl. 6 C.Y. 1,060 10.00 10,600.00 Aggregate Base,Cl. 4 C.Y. 2,300 11.00 25,300.00 Type 61 Wear Course Ton 480 30.00 14,400.00 Type 31 Binder Ton 450 25.00 11,250.00 Type 31 Base Ton 630 24.00 15,120.00 Tack Coat Gal. 930 2.00 1,860.00 Saw Bituminous Pavement L.F. 40 3.00 120.00 Mill Bituminous Pavement S.Y. 5,390 1.00 5,390.00 Traffic Control L.S. 1 5,000.00 5,000.00 Pavement Markings L.S. 1 5,550.00 5,500.00 Bale Check Each 68 5.00 340.00 Silt Fence L.F. 800 2.00 1,600.00 Turf Restoration L.S. 1 8,200.00 8,200.00 Street Lights Each 2 1,300.00 2,600.00 Subtotal $148,980.00 Plus 10% Contingencies 14.898.00. Estimated Construction Cost $163,878.00 Plus 30% Legal, Administrative, Engineering & Bond Interest 49.222.00 Total Estimated Cost $213,100.00 City of Eagan Appendix A St.Thomas Beckett Addition S3 Page A-4 Appendix B Preliminary Assessment Roll St. Thomas Beckett City Project 640 Preliminary Assessment Roll Property I.D. No. Watermain Sanitary Sewer T.H. 3 Total 010-75 $80,500 $158,000 $213,100 $451,600 City of Eagan Appendix AB St.Thomas Beckett Addition tJ Page B-1 -- f tk F ¢_ _`° EXIST-.- C-A._(i YP -' \�_ {; .�_ v r fv r �` 'fie r • }}• 1 . 4 !1,' N t S S GATE VALVE ,. }''' t ,I; ' } I ilk •. ,f 1,--t.....1 lik . 8 r; :, .ii .mss 3, : 4�►?! \, f 0 100 0 ! i j)j/• • a • SCALE IN FEET 11 FIELD .` f/ 5 i' y$. h!il . f f 1 = II .... - i I li i :II!. i :,.,�■a,.,�+_�:'*. E ■y ► I 8• W.M. .. .. .f. SS . t • . ...._.. . ., r.,,..., „__..... _...._ yiv,„ til- f` j/,�� j1 „.______) ‘ \----------- f , , \, -- ,.. \ , . . ::::::::: umg .:.:::::::: ! ::::::.:::::::::...... .::::::::::::::" ::::„. / . . .. •. : ...,: `ANT & VALVE (TYP)--0- ,►•:' * i i0 �``� t .5.. y�` °` i^�, \`., ` _f' .�! LEGEND ._.-- t r } �� POND HWL ELEV. -r l' i% i '-- - ; • WL SETBACK r I '1 i --—",.. t I . ) ..n I'. II.- ii-- ilmoji__,......____ __ t 1 / . �-----.-JIB; r l i ;f` ' "1/�,,,.po' irr, ; ,J i C _; `� -.. :. — _ t PROJ. NO. 640 PROPOSED STORM SEWER & WATERMAIN ,sai ST. THOMAS BECKET CHURCH 93144 EAGAN, MINNESOTA FIG. NO. ENGINEERS I ARCHITECTS•PLANNERS 2 ■I■. •. , ••••., 'l 4"&I,i I A atii ix .f 1 ;....... _7 I V" '.,,.. ------- 1! i q i ......... - - _._. / 7---- :///Th . '' I! 1 I -...,•r : .:z ,--- , t :III — ,;;; il 4" • U I i ...._ , / • ,, :. ,.4., , . .,...... ,•.....:;,....... x 2, i :,:.,. itt:::„..1 „... . -. . ,...,......--_,,...r......_ • ,, \ t ----- .„ . . --, j 12 * .. ; ••:•. -• • X ...:.: 914- . '..\\.„....„... . ;i,; i INSTALL 18 CULVE il '"''' 1: z. _ I • „--",.. --,,, .: WE •• •,- 0 100 200 , . ANS-1XL 24" CUEVEAT —..),„. ,- 11 ..4 1!''' i! r..] . SCALE IN FEET ABANDON EXIST: Cs,...,VERT : :•:•:1 •::::: - 1111' :?'At/ : "--• / 1 : ) PLACE PILL IN ,X1.ST,. DITC . . ., ...., i N.-, i 4 • 909.8 1 : i • : .4,/ \ . • 71 (7,-:- / „-----. . : i i • ......__ - • , '------ I f •• 1 -, ,(----' , .. ... . I / i . ::::' 1 i C 4 „,,,,..,/,. • ... . i ::71 ::, 1 : - 1 ; • ;- - . „ • • ----.. i ....::-.„ •,,,, , ,-, ; 906A • i = . . . . • :: 1 ; T.H. 3 - .-i• .,1 - • :1 '; '; : . . , •....,,:-•;------* i , . i ,. \N. '-,.._ •••• \ k ' ...__, ........, ,, . ,- . ,..V Ai ' . 1 RAILROAt\TRACKS ••••••■•■•..6.1"WiROY.1.0. / i \ ir i:V 4 1 \ \ . .-- -...___ ,1 I i x - \ . , , - . , . 1 _ ,...---- •.-....--i• , .- , ..._ _ '‘.„..w. 1,61.3-76 i • iii ( Dill /2..i i 1 i . ,• ! II • , ...--, -------\ 1 1 UL. • ATED FM.1,17 -- -- ';\ ' /.. ..t.?\ • i I/ , I \ I „--li rTN .: \ \ , - ,.. ,,,.. ; t —t., , .! , I .,-- . ! ,........, )\si 014-7 , . •\ ` i ' • ---1 /I / • . , „., -- 1 , • 1 $,/ ' ' 8” SAN. MH (TYP) i I -— rs... \ .••; I I ,,, N......j s ../r-N) I 4 4 i , ),= i .. „ y , / 1 ./ i i I 1 ill i • ; / i ' s' it 1 - .,. C)..„..... 1 "/ I i i , '‘ PR i. NO. 64 ...., , „......... , . , ... 16 el f I-- --i WI i CONNECT TO EXIS-(SN.1 A SEWE''' /I / , ______,IDROPOSED • . .EXL5r.--12, SA•1•L'- % : 1 - 1 , .......,.:.- .. .. . ... .. .S ANITARY , ,.., „...0....„ ..____- - .. . - ,,. --.111`'"t's . --.' - -' -' 'SEINER .„....-A„. i„..„ _ . .-&:.:7"---"-----•-:'--"'"' '''","'• '''''"'`` , FILE NO. AddirSal ST. THOMAS BECKET CHURCH 93144 . IMF EAGAN, MINNESOTA FIG. NO. ENGINEERS 11 ARCHITECTS I PLANNERS • 3 r9 z N Z cc � � �- ,. I; w w Wow w a. •f _o 0 . --i > ¢ I p 3 Qo _ I- Zoe O U N v O j Z C./) u n °D } j I W p r J yl CD C) b J `o - co III ` J } _ ■ Z m Cn UJ cc a W H w W Z w m m w Q m c m• ° Wm'c , 80- I I � ww ¢ Z Z¢ N N U U J r •- z • O 0� I Q NehCOI- NV) N ' 3.. � W m � }Z w. >°Q a � W¢ CO C F z J r �� co O N 0 Q Z - O z a -J Cr MI X H ;r ¢ N O O O coO / ■1( y ,..:.:::.:::.:::::::::::::. i!:',:.:..i.: :::. ,:.; w w CC U - ¢ W w 0 \ ¢ V) • cc Q O N Q I- r) N< J p W = d Z = H 1.- m O 40+ I Cu _ N f- �- cn a c w ' W o ~ • Z -t4 c CO ■ PROD. NO.TRUNK HIGHWAY 3 ACCESS 640 ��i► ST. HOMAS BECKET CHURCH 93144 AGAN, MINNESOTA FIG. NO. ENGINEERS I ARCHITECTS•PLANNERS 4 Agenda Information Memo December 1, 1992, City Council Meeting mvesmEss KINGSWOOD 2ND ADDITION A. Kingswood 2nd Addition,Review of Escrow Account Balance (Project 88-SS)--In an effort to close out the contract for the above-referenced subdivision, City staff has requested the developer to reimburse the City in accordance with the executed escrow and development contract agreements for expenses incurred by the City associated with the development of the Kingswood 2nd Addition. The developer, James Home, through his attorney, Rollie Crawford, has appeared before the City Council objecting to the amount of expenses incurred by the City contending that they were excessive and requesting the City Council to significantly reduce the amount of their obligation. The City Council then directed several City staff representatives to meet with Mr. Crawford to review and discuss the issues and, if an understanding cannot be reached, to then present it to the Public Works Committee for consideration with a recommendation to be returned to the City Council at a later date. On March 16, City staff met with Mr. Crawford and, after reviewing all the various issues associated with this development, it was agreed that the issue could not be resolved and should be directed to the Public Works Committee. On Tuesday, March 31, the Public Works Committee met and reviewed the staffs report (7 pages, 6 exhibits) and Mr. Crawford's position. Enclosed on page A) is a copy of the minutes from that Public Works Committee meeting. This Committee's recommendation was then forwarded to Mr. Crawford for a response which is included on pages 64 and . With Mr. Crawford's response not being different from the position presented at the March 31 Public Works Committee meeting, it was again reviewed by the Public Works Committee on November 23. A copy of those minutes is enclosed on pages 63 and g . The Public Works Committee concluded that with no change in the developers position, the Public Works Committee recommendation of March 31 should remain as previously stated and the issue forwarded to the City Council for final determination on December 1. Copies of the developer's original letter of February 19, 1991, and the multi-page summary report by staff dated March 25, 1992, which were reviewed in detail by the Public Works Committee, is available for any member of the City Council's review if desired. If requested, a copy of this detailed background information will be provided under separate cover. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To review the escrow account balance of the Kingswood 2nd Addition (Project 88-SS) and determine an appropriate amount to be collected within a specific time frame under the terms and conditions of the development contract and escrow agreements. ; , , • PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE MEETING 4:00 P.M. MARCH 31, 1992 At 4:00 p.m. , Tuesday, March 31, 1992, the Public Works Committee met in Conference Rooms A & B of the Municipal Center to review the request of the developer of the Kingswood 2nd Addition to reduce the charges associated with the escrow account for Project 88-SS, Kingswood 2nd Addition. Those in attendance were Rollie Crawford, Attorney for the developer, James Horne; Tom Colbert, Director of Public Works; Tom Hedges, City Administrator; Mike Dougherty, Assistant City Attorney; Mayor Tom Egan & Councilmember Ted • Wachter, Chair. The Committee reviewed a memo prepared by Tom Colbert dated March .25 which provided a summary of a previous meeting between City staff and the developer's representative discussing the outstanding escrow balance for the Kingswood 2nd Addition, Project 88-SS. The meeting began with Mr. Crawford reiterating the developer's concerns and position as originally stated in his letter of February 19, 1991, and specifically responding to Mr. Colbert's memo of March 25 identifying 11 (eleven) activities unique to this development justifying the costs incurred. Mr. Crawford requested the Public Works Committee to take into consideration their feelings that many of these costs were incurred either as a benefit to the City or at the specific request and requirement of the City, thereby justifying a reduction in the escrow account through some joint participation by the City. Of the outstanding escrow balance of approximately $42,500 ($746 per lot) , Mr. Crawford felt that the City should reduce the outstanding escrow balance by approximately $14,000 ($246 per lot) to reflect the City's share for their involvement in this project. At the conclusion of Mr. Crawford's presentation, he excused himself from the meeting to allow the Public Works Committee to consider the developer's request and arrive at a recommendation. After further discussion of the history of the project by various members present, the Public Works Committee recommended that the escrow account be reduced by $3,575 ($63 per lot) to reflect 50% of the City's staff time ($7, 157) charged to this escrow account. City staff was then directed to review this recommendation with Mr. Crawford in hopes of reaching an agreement that can be jointly presented to the City Council at the next appropriate meeting. The meeting adjourned at approximately 5:30 p.m. Respectful subm'tt D' ector of Public Wor s TAC/j j 60 . ATTORNEYS AT LAW ARTHUR GILLEN ROGER C.LEVANDER, GILLEN & MILLER, P.A. T IL KUNTZ DANIEL J.BEESON ROLLIN H.CRAWFORD 833 SOUTH CONCORD STREET SUITE 402 P.O.BOX 298 KELLY J.NEILAN KRUELL SOUTH ST PAUL.MINNESOTA 55075 KENNETH J.ROHLF 812-451-1831 FAX 812-450-7384 ELIZABETH J.WOLF HAROLD LEYANDER 1910-1992 November 4, 1992 . • Mr. James Sheldon City Attorney • . 600 Midway National Bank Building - 7300 W. 147th Street Apple Valley, Minnesota 55124 RE: Kings Wood 2nd Addition — Horne Development Corporation Negative Escrow Question Dear Mr. Sheldon: I have reviewed the fairly extensive information that the City has provided in connection with the escrow charges for Kings Wood 2nd Addition escrow charges. I have also reviewed with Mr. Horne the considerable information provided by the City Staff in connection with their justification of the charges on this project. It is fair to say that the number of questions that arose as a result of this project are accurately listed in the staff information. The continuing disagreement would appear to be over the responsibility for those questions and who should bear the costs connected with their resolution. As we have stated in our meetings and other conversations, the realignment of the access to Pilot Knob Road was initiated by the City for purposes of requiring the Kings Wood entrance to be aligned with a proposed future entrace to the City property across the street. This realignment of the access resulted in numerous meetings and time and caused significant additional engineering, including the access to Jim Horne's own driveway and the curvature of the road around the Allen Notvik property. It further caused a considerable amount of engineering effort in connection with the street profile of Coronation Road. There were substantial additional costs to Horne Development Corporation for his private engineering and legal work in connection with these changes to accomodate the City. All of this occurred inspite of the fact that Kings Wood had a previously platted legal access to Pilot Knob Road which Horne Development Corporation had full right and authority to use as part of a previously approved plat, and in fact, had intended to use. L / • V / James Sheldon November 4, 1992 Page Two It is our firm position that this redesign of the streets at that the City staff initiative resulted in the major portion of the atypical engineering costs in connection with the design of this plat. While it would be tempting to enter into a "dueling banjos" scenario on this matter and deal with each of the occurances on an item by item basis, I believe that we had concluded some time ago that simply is not the way to reach resolution. Our preferred approach is to step back from the detail in order to diffuse some of the feelings that have arisen over this matter • and to try to resolve it by looking at the "typical" costs of a subdivision and perhaps making some adjustments from that number. It was this latter approach that I thought had resulted in an earlier tentative resolution of the matter whereby the subdivision would be expected to pay $450 per lot for all of the services that were provided. That figure is considerably higher than the "typical" cost (perhaps double) for a subdivision in recognition of some of the unique features that this subdivision enjoys. It is also lower than the actual costs because it is our firm belief that a substantial amount of those costs were caused by the City's actions for its own purposes unrelated to the needs of the developer of the subdivision. To use this type of approach is pot an attempt to evade the reality of the actual costs, it is merely a recognition that if we expend the resources to deal with the details and challenge each of those assumptions, the costs of resolution of the matter will exceed the amounts in dispute. Therefore, based upon our review and analysis we renew our request that the matter be settled. In the interest of demonstrating a willingness to get this matter behind us we will offer to settle the matter at $500 per lot for a total amount of $28,500.00 as opposed to the $42,500.00 which has been charged. I would be most happy to meet with you and discuss this matter at your convenience. Ver ly yours, Rollin H. Crawford RHC:ln cc: James Horne ‘1:2- MINUTES OF THE PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE November 23, 1992 A Public Works Committee meeting was held at 7:30 a.m.on Monday,November 23, 1992 at Bakers Square Restaurant to discuss: 1) Kings Wood Settlement, 2) Cedar Grove Appraisals and 3) Parranto Assessment Objection. Those In attendance were Public Works Committee Members Mayor Egan and Committee Chair City Councilmember Wachter. Also in attendance were Director of Public Works Colbert, Director of Finance VanOverbeke, City Attorney Sheldon and City Administrator Hedges. KINGS WOOD SETTLEMENT Director of Public Works Colbert reviewed the status of the Kings Wood escrow, stating that the amount of the escrow balance has been In dispute by Home Development Corporation for the Kings Wood Development for over a year. He reminded the Public Works Committee that at a Committee meeting on March 31, 1992,the Committee agreed to a 50 percent reduction of the City's staff time,which is a reduction of $3,575, amounting to approximately $63 per lot. The per lot cost, according to the Public Works Committee recommendation, would be $683, a reduction from the original per lot cost of $746. This recommendation was a direct response to a proposal submitted by Rollie Crawford, on behalf of Home Development Corporation, during March, 1992 to reduce the amount of the escrow to$500 per lot. The Public Works Committee recommendation at $683 per lot was presented to Mr. Crawford in early April. After several months of negotiations, Mr.Crawford has submitted another letter dated November 4, 1992 and is again suggesting the settlement at$500 per lot. After a lengthy discussion, it was the findings of the Public Works Committee to again support the March 31, 1992 recommendation which reduces the per lot cost for the Kings Wood escrow balance by$63 per lot, $746 to$683. It was reiterated that the out- of-pocket costs charged in the escrow balance were for services requested by Home Development Corporation and any adjustment would be a direct subsidy to the general fund. It was suggested that the Public Works Committee recommendation be considered by the City Council at the December 1, 1992 meeting. CEDAR GROVE APPRAISALS The Director of Public Works stated that appraisals for the Cedar Grove street and utility reconstruction, Project #617R, will be ready on approximately December 3. The City Attorney stated that the preliminary analysis is$1,500 to $3,000 per lot. The Director of Public Works expressed concern that the City Council be given an opportunity to review appraisals by the December 8 public hearing date. After further consideration, it was agreed that the Public Works Committee would meet at 7:30 a.m. on Monday, December 7 to review the appraisals and present a recommendation to the City Council for the December 8 special Cedar Grove hearing to be held at Mary, Mother of the Church. PARRANTO ASSESSMENTS City Attorney Sheldon reviewed an appraisal that Dick Heinen has reviewed for the Parranto assessment levied under Project 622. The Director of Public Works has met with Mr. Mark Parranto to discuss his objection to special assessments for the Cedar Industrial Park Improvements. It appears that Mr. Parranto's main objection is the direct cost for the driveway approach aprons, stating that Mr. Parranto has requested a credit for the recent parking lot improvement on his property. Mr. Colbert stated that the only objection with the 25 to 30 parcels levied in assessment in the Cedar Industrial Park and the 40 to 50 parcels in Eagandale Industrial Park was Mr. Parranto's. After further consideration, staff and the Public Works Committee both agreed that a 50 percent reduction of the driveway apron assessment, estimated at $3,800, be authorized, which offsets the previous parking lot improvements paid by Mark Parranto. 63 Page 2/PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE MINUTES November 23, 1992 OTHER BUSINESS The Director of Public Works and City Administrator explained an issue the City has experienced regarding detailed engineering plans and specifications for the Lexington Pointe 8th Addition Project. It was explained that Brad Swenson has been retained by Bob Engstrom to perform the engineering design for City - utilities and street improvements. It was pointed out that many of the plans are incomplete,which is causing a delay for final plat approval for Lexington Pointe 8th Addition. The Public Works Committee agreed that no utilities should proceed nor should the final plat in any way be approved prior to an acceptable set of plans for the street infrastructure. ADJOURNMENT The meeting was adjourned at approximately 9:00 a.m. Dated: November 23, 1992 TLH 64/ Agenda Information Memo December 1, 1992 City Council Meeting CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT/OUTDOOR STORAGE TOM THUMB/YANKEE SQUARE B. Conditional Use Permit, Tom Thumb, to Allow Outdoor Storage in a Commercial Zoning District on Lot 1,BIock 1,Bicentennial 1st Addition Located Along the South Side of Yankee Doodle Road in the Northeast Quarter of Section 16--At its meeting of July 28, 1992, the Advisory Planning Commission considered an application for a conditional use permit for the Tom Thumb Store at Yankee Square Shopping Center. For additional information relative to the application, please refer to the Community Development Department staff re ort which is enclosed on pages Elg.through, for your review. Also enclosed on pages through/care the Advisory Planning Commission minutes relative to this item. The C is recommending denial for the reasons indicated in the minutes. This item was continued at the City Council meeting of August 4, 1992 to permit the • Council and Advisory Planning Commission to meet in joint session to discuss the outdoor storage requirement. That meeting was held on Tuesday evening, November 24. At that time,the ordinance interpretation was clarified between the two bodies and action was given to staff to return these items to the Council for consideration. While minor modifications of the body of the outdoor storage ordinance were suggested, the principal code elements relative to these items remain unchanged. In addition to the information provided in the staff report and the Advisory Planning Commission minutes, City Code Section 11.40, Subdivision 4(c) states as follows: a) Outdoor storage items shall be placed within an enclosure. b) All such enclosures shall be attached to the principal building except in a limited industrial district. c) The enclosure shall be made of material suitable to the building and the items to be stored (Council and Commission interpreted this to mean the same building materials as the principal structure). d) The enclosure shall not interfere with any pedestrian or vehicular movement(The Council and Commission interpreted this to mean that no storage could occur on sidewalks). ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny a conditional use permit for outdoor storage for the Tom Thumb Store located on Lot 1, Block 1, Bicentennial 1st Addition at the Yankee Square Shopping Center as presented. 66 SUBJECT: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT APPLICANT: TOM THUMB STORES LOCATION: LOT 1, BLOCK 1, BICENTENNIAL 1ST (1446 YANKEE DOODLE ROAD) EXISTING ZONING: NB (NEIGHBORHOOD BUSINESS) DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: JULY 28, 1992 DATE OF REPORT: JULY 16, 1992 COMPILED BY: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT APPLICATION SUMMARY: An application has been submitted requesting a Conditional Use Permit to allow outside storage on the sidewalk in front of the Yankee Square Tom Thumb store located on Lot 1, Block 1, Bicentennial 1st Addition. BACKGROUND: On November 19, 1991, the City Council adopted Section 11.10, Subd. 29c of the City Code to regulate outside storage in commercial and industrial zoning districts. In an effort to give businesses time to comply with the new ordinance, the City Council allowed a six-month grace period before requiring all outside storage to comply. COMMENTS: The applicant is proposing outside storage in front of the brick Tom Thumb store that will include seasonal merchandise (i.e. salt pellets, firewood, windshield solvent) in a "corral style" enclosure made of treated lumber, as well .as an ice cooler and an approximately 3'x 3'x 6' propane cylinder cabinet. Outside storage minimum standards set forth in City Code Section 11.10,Subd. 29c include: 1. Outside storage items shall be placed within an enclosure. 2. All such enclosures shall be attached to the principal building except in the light industrial district. 3. The enclosure shall be made of material suitable to the building and the items to be stored. 4. The enclosure shall not encroach into any established front building setback or other required setbacks. S. The enclosure shall not interfere with any pedestrian or vehicular movement. 6. The items to be stored shall not exceed the height of the enclosure. 7. The display area shall not take up required parking spaces or landscaped areas. 8. The display area shall be surfaced with concrete or an approved equivalent to control dust and erosion. The surface shall be properly maintained to prevent deterioration. 9. The square footage of outdoor display areas shall be included in the calculation • of required off-street parking for the principal use of the property. The applicant has not provided an enclosure for the propane cabinet or ice cooler. The seasonal merchandise enclosure is open on top and in front. The suitability of treated lumber to a brick building shall be determined by the Advisory Planning Commission and the City Council. Also, the proposed storage location is on the pedestrian sidewalk in front of the store and encroaches into the established front building setback which is measured from the building foundation. FINANCIAL OBLIGATION - 16-CU-9.6.91, Lot 1, Block 1, Bicentennial Addition Based upon the study of the financial obligations collected in the past and the uses proposed for the property, the following charges are proposed. The charges are computed using the City's existing fee schedule and connections proposed to be made to the City's utility system based on the submitted plans. Improvement Use Rate Quantity Amount None • • • • 6 If approved, this Conditional Use Permit shall be subject to the following conditions: 1. The Conditional Use Permit shall be recorded at Dakota County within 60 days of approval with documentation provided to the City. 2. Outside storage items shall be placed within an enclosure. 3. All such enclosures shall be attached to the principal building except in the light industrial district. 4. The enclosure shall be made of material suitable to the building and the items to be stored. 5. The enclosure shall not encroach into any established front building setback or other required setbacks. 6. The enclosure shall not interfere with any pedestrian or vehicular movement. 7. The items to be stored shall not exceed the height of the enclosure. 8. The display area shall not take up required parking spaces or landscaped areas. : 9. The display area shall be surfaced with concrete or an approved equivalent to control dust and erosion. The surface shall be properly maintained to prevent deterioration. 10. The square footage of outdoor display areas shall be included in the calculation of required off-street parking for the principal use of the property. 11. All applicable City Codes shall be adhered to. • • • • dg s. _ ilti:=i1:1:li i � ; 1.i hill • ji j=l :.l ii 1 _1fily; f _ IJiH1iI1I!!1 111111 ;' s • t i's ji ; 111:i•1imliiIti i.: i ; .iiiiiiiii in a I. • W I ro�vw,w..M .0... w ai.es—t ,_„_�� i.� r_ soil* .. I Ie. ..11.31 1........ ;. o ±. I s I i •rte % '1 . Ill . t 1 : :, ! _ I 1,_ kiime;:iii W R s. _. • _ti of. �.i_--� _, I �' 11 ' �s�; — T. --: _ _I. I - =5 ,,_ « .i 1 ,. .1111_ I I_ 1 . 2. 1T , ,, 4 *:4.1 W _ !.771 I .M WI i/ I • ill ..=111 - -1,11: : ,;. J k ij • OP % £))LL$ 1•111103.0 "III it I 1r — 69 a • • Z • 0 • • v m C SUBMITTED BY APPLICANT r2O o -41 • 4 I al Pr 2 n GI "1"IfiVICIleisli _Adl-r--- 1 it L; 1' v i -, a itsvelp, 1, 3( t.. jails k Leer quality. -it's your merchandiser. _ _ it's our 25-year reputation_ flodel40 Slant 1;k kei/R l� This attention-getting. • . outdoor ice merchandiser I - offers compact size.yet large it-capacity inventory to assure :impact sales with increased .,-profits-Full two-inch thick. + 114 "t_ ..,-profits polyurethane d �t ier .+:insulation in all walls.tops. SPECIFICATIONS: Mind bottoms easily protects your inventory. MODEL 40 i0 Capse*y SS Sags 140 210 Approx.Cu.Ft. 40 N Doodles !J•s!'f• 27N27- Outside Height NW NW Outside Width SOW !T Outside Depth • SSW NW 17: COO Wadi WaiQltet !06 40i ***Model 60, Slant Aula0sfmstWK MS 410 i:A Compact profitability,direct prnpasaer,Anlps +y6NrryI$V %HP/1i$v consumer awareness and• 1 e E 1 :..". wsUipseont 12 12 T,a�; appeal is evidenced in this +^�° space-saving Model 60 ice w�+wr,�w�rrlwrr�M,,,.y�,�iyrr, merchandiser from Leer.The Omar mot Mr�ew�«agr�e�rrlrrAa�llfwww+�MrrirNwilMrr large.embossed.stainless "pwowi�wwNwMw y�wowrrgrwrMrpe„r„rr• steel doors feature welded edges and easy access. c i1 � Leer Manufacturing Company, Inc. P-O.Box 206 -J.1 ��1�f%7�� i.t i (608)562 3161 206 North Leer Street WATS(800)356 5764 National New Lisbon.WI53950-0206 (800)352 5711 Wisconsin • D BY APPLICANT ■ - - ...... • .• P.1 JU1 24 '92 10:47;41 :. • : • •Strong,Durable Construction • . ., Cub*Turbo's cabinets have proven themselves stronger and more durable than : any others presently on the market. • i , Throe shelf 27 cylinder model • •Dimensions: 40"x 40"x 71" -Constructed of 12-gauge steel -Welded Construction : 1 • •Weighs approx.475 pounds dame mesh shelves • •Holds 27.20#cylinders •Two mesh doors with padlock hup li . Also available with the same high quality construction are: ..; . ; •INvo shelf 18 cylinder model • .. i . ; , • One shelf 9 cylinder model . • 12 cylinder forklift cylinder storage unit. . 1 • . ; • . •High Quality Paint i • 1 • The cabinets are primed and painted with the highest guilty Epoxy paints. ! : -Standard cabinets painted white • , • •Special orders for company colors • : ; • . I .. . : •Signals t. We affix three 140 National Pin Protection sIgns popane signs and one no: i smoking sign. There 4 a solid,flat plate*ppm 12"x 96"above the top door to ; which your adverdsement can be edded(print or deal for cylinder exchange). , • • 11.• • I 1 . ,„,,,„.•••■•• •w• • ■••••11111■•■•••■ ■ . •• •••' • • ....• - P ?...:--•;:-f-:`:•••••: . \ I . . I.!.r' :t s. 1 • ' , •**, .V.1..-d-?'• .-: i-C.:-7:r 14-.:::,v4. b/ t'- -;•64:94r4 -- -• .• ' :.s, 4ii if • 4.--i-.',..i•-•., -1117. •- • __•7-•••.••••• -.1K-1., „.-. . . ,..• ,i -- .•1••• 1 4 C*1-111i;'' ...5a:,.xy: ' ._. .. -■ r. ....,,..-.....3 I A.:ill:IL:140JF- "--i1.-: ,f ,-----.,t:'•4.1 .t:7-...%?:••::••,. . . ; ,L ... .. L. ...:-,.. ay,•., ., --f• ‘4'. - ---- ti, ,. ••••‘. , ic. '' -4.•''''' --:‘-'" ' • 7 ;* ., i , .':,-V.;17;fir).e : ...,: ::-.40,-..-tk ;) • • i.ii..„,-:.,.. ..- ---- .4.i-... .. • ,. • 1,4 . 1 .4.*:,,i.; tt :-.it- -L..Z1 : • V'''.1-4 1/ ,"r!,-. .1 -,-...,•••t,N,.....p.V. • •, • • 1 i i l':1;.1..P,-;•-.----..=-0.--,;":"Att, !. tt • f• . i i.,,:4`..ir op 4 1-.1.-..i.-.y.:.:.:.:,1 . '`• . -‘...,,e):./. i.:;1.11.7i:7;.iiitt..:-,;:'!.-7.."---..-7:(:•--.:4. ....I i 1 1 . .----- . ,. ::.y..,. if r.‘ ...,3-,,,,-...... „i 41,•,i.1,t.k.ic,,,-...0,--1...Tr, 414 . • , . .i ,,,,,.„ . ....,,c...„ ...-.• .:-......: ./1 . _.44.00°.... '.%'•1,,,, •'• 1._:X 'II--,‘,.--..:ii.7--; •-•., ' ;..4 . ,.; k,::..: -_-___ . --.t. --- • 1 ...•4„:,',41,"4.441141..:or,I 1, ,•I'A,•r-...-`.....--..,;, --ci; illlik - •••. , 1 , , • :,.r..0.,T, alt..t.:r---.---.----!..-....- 1 .1:171rril....■.**N.;21,C4.i.: 17:‘ kit . ifY. . ..- .:(.,-21.,-.--- 7.1'•14;:v..-3.-t-.. 1:-,':-;.r..Vaill v *it . • t.....A.F.••:...A.:.,A,,,I..4-..,.,.. .... . , 1 .:?1,• •,...- --- --_--. 4.; • ••-• -1.:-.4 • yr,-4.- -‘• . _ 1 , • 12 cylinder forklift cabinet. • .. t. ... .4i .• ..... ... -;;:-.0.-__-.... .11 I . (73 k 430 cspar-lty)• :: • , . • \\ • • .• • , i II cylinder cabinet • . ! 1 : i • • 1 Oat 20•33•43e tanks) . : I. • 1 • • ' .• : i • . • 1 . . -- . I -....e.,-- .-•7-„-r., ..-; ......;• iAil ?:"e4'7 =•.;-:•.--;---:---e--so J re,gii,-,,--..;T:t.f, _-1,.-. 7r-..,.,•-•-••:1 •••---i . - - :.,:,;„ .0 •-"•.--:-1,' .. .. ",•1, -•?. ---. -. , . _...-ir -1-1•; 1‘,',,- ! i. _ .,,,...?.?- .,-1....!• _ ..._-.,,*.,... ..-.,.,.,,,_.,•••• .... - P-4, - ' , 27 Cylinder cablrat ••• ....• I•.' -4',11 t;-'•k•-_- ---t••• -1--:--=ta: -.-. 1 .1 4 , ,', • (for 200 was) • ••••!•:■t, +T. .• .-. : . .-.-* !.-..* --.-- ti. ,7,2 - • ; 14? „Ak.,,i,. , .";,,,..4>_Bi F.--;•.F.f,-^. t.i.4,4 -..t.r.t.-:%.,;•••,,f0,:soi,..,-, • . r.- -,-•.4,..,,,,- , ..t. ,,,,).1...- .:•,..-- , 4.v. • -NO' , • , :■III,:,,:if••• • 2.r.......";.V.:ill-1M , ,:i.- :4.4.. • -.4, . - ( ,•-..,-;,:-.;„-, - ■ • .$•37'r-- -' - it e.'.1 vii.t.f,- 'V. !. Iti...' .7r..IL:','- Er----.`t,-1-. ..-:71'4: Ai* kit' - ' •••-'...i..41- •'4•' .1!•. ' ■•:•0. . ' ' '4,4,t:0 i'`--4-, i rL I IL. -::'• .1.1 e-..-0.-t., i.I,. le.i.:;A ... • 4i.. i ,P..7sk.i.<4 l' ":(12 ''47•,*t----'-*--..-..' ',-'-, -:-‘1‘-.t)-ly' .. 1 '-..4--.` :V41; ? ' 4:*' '' ..--1)11 Ya'34'2?:';‘: . le '.;i,t - k: • . .,--i ....-... '..:Att. 4.0.1 k:..... .• I s . . .....'•:...f.q t .--, •t.-- ':-. ''. ',7. ! --, f t, ;ft.?, - .'r litir.!,:*:-.: . -3 -- v. -,,A;%ft'f,- . . '' ".<4..,. ' ' ' lilt.Z• .'._ ,.. ..opj.,,, tkle'..-.•,4---,„64.1ie■4.:,, ,,t.. ,.,.. r. ...1'.....ti;.4,Wii ...'..!..:4:1.J.: , -i ',Or;"',21• 01,1X ,, `7.; .,,,Vt, 4;! • ___•ii".i;,.-:i,,z,./-*.<,. ". .j!. c ! •Ir•t•I''_,:in 4.4.*.i ■I 'Ifr:4 I 1 I ,,.'s ■ //.. iiti f: ',/,'• Il 41,,,tief.i; it's7' --• ../%1,.);.::-41-41? ..,..;, 8 . ;'..-•''WI el: f .th it-.t• . i , ..-,41.i.i... .,,,wil'•il, "...v., %. K-.....`10 7,!;-'.k.,',.-.."..--......;".'... c.-...,' , ,----!n 4-.•c-4 . --s•;.'fitk:.f.:-•'.: ., :fi.tr4.4: , •. •\i.;s.•s„, pi.- .1 it •••C., -.4. -11; '--1'e ,:t_ • -'g „,..:•,4 . 1 ....::,,,,,,t,x,.• ;NI; .-:,:..;.0„-,...,,f 1., • „..,• jr,.• ';,....•, -ts !I • . -..A I ...! !„...j., . ,.•-. •••' jr -„k•,-..!.? ;•rx- tir.-4 I .:;!.1 I. i .42. .T...1;..i:li I/ 1 Eti•:. .; , •,I • . .,„ • . ... \ `- --jje,„,-,,,1•••?6,,k....,. .' •'•i'.* S',.. ..•:.; ' '1 '•'htler.-. •...4..4..1:WY:4 ' .I''' . 11A l'il : 1.-1.••.7'.' i l' i jr „,..; .i'oectig rr;_:s. -..._s.Zik:..•4§01... ;.i -;i311,; ,,_11::--:..kr!: j •-.'.-..R.A;'.-..1:'04i1j.... ..1s.•:■i.,: . . .,...W1:.:::t•,•.7,.... ...-A„i.iV:.:...V sI I 27 c.y.r l.ipn"d iet r eating °e1t 1 c'l irds.t cabl 1 f 0 neet i.• •,' 014dir 1 c o•lon•• • (for 20-33 43e ds) • • w 1 . . . . .. . • s • • Ex146/7/43 .. 1 . . .. •. . . • • SUBMITTED BY APPLICANT . . 70)-- - . • • • 4i • Q II 4 z V • kks • Z ' V 0 O O t. t t ..0 C 3 SUBMITTED BY APPLICANT JUL 29 '92 12:17 SEVERSON.WILCOX & ShENDON C 026 P06 Page 6/EAGAN ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES JULY 28, 1992 TOM WOMB CONDITIONNAL USE PERMIT Chairman Voracek opened the next public hearing of the evening regarding a Conditional Use Permit to allow outdoor storage in a commercial zoning district on Lot 1, Block 1, Bicentennial 1st Addition located along the south side of Yankee Doodle Road in the NE 1/4 of Section 16. City Planner Sturm reviewed the background of this application and the Outdoor Storage ordinance. Tim Wandzel, a representative of Tom Thumb, stated that this application meets all requirements of the City Code. He further stated he was there to answer any questions. Member Merkley stated that the City Council prepared a list of minimum standards that must be met before a conditional use permit for outdoor storage would be approved. He felt that these minimum standards had not been met with this application. He stated that the proposed "corral style" enclosure was not actually an enclosure as there was no top or front on the enclosure. Also, the "corral style" enclosure is not proposed to be made with material suitable to the existing building. Member Merkley further stated that this application will encroach on the setbacks and interfere with pedestrian movement. For these reasons, this application should be denied. Member Miller stated that the applicant knows the current City Code and should propose an application which meets this Code. He felt that the applicant had not done this. Member Hoeft commented that he measured the sidewalk outside of Tom Thumb and found it to be 10 feet wide. The proposed ice container will take up 3 feet of this area, another 2 feet will be lost to pillars which are in front of Tom Thumb, and another 2 feet will be lost to parked cars which overhang onto the sidewalk. This leaves 3 feet for pedestrian movement which Member Hoeft felt was inadequate and unsafe. He also agreed with Member Merkley's comments. Mr. Wandzel replied that the product would not be stored behind the pillar and mentioned that the post office and City Hall only had 5 foot wide sidewalks. Mr. Wandzel stated that he went to all the meetings regarding this outdoor storage ordinance and felt that the City Council defined "enclosure" as to surround an area. He felt that the material proposed for the enclosure is suitable as it would match the trim of the existing building. He concluded that Tom Thumb was also concerned about pedestrian safety. r? �•• �� �.J•G.< mc.vmmurr 9 W i LWX 24 bhtNDUN C 032 P02 Page 7/EAGAN ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES JULY 28, 1992 Member Griggs felt that the applicant was meeting all standards of the City Code. Member Miller stated that he agreed with Member Hoeft's comments. Merkley moved, Hoeft seconded, the motion to deny a Conditional Use Permit to allow outdoor storage in a commercial zoning district on Lot 1, Block 1, Bicentennial 1st Addition located along the south side of Yankee Doodle Road in the NE 1/4 of Section 16, for the following reasons: 1. The minimum standards of the City Code have not been met, specifically: a. Outside storage items shall be placed within an enclosure. b. The enclosure shall be made of material suitable to the building and the items to be stored. c. The enclosure shall not interfere with any pedestrian or vehicular movement. 2. Safety hazard. 3. Aesthetics. All present voted in favor, except Griggs who opposed. Motion approved 6-1. 75 Agenda Information Memo December 1, 1992 City Council Meeting CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT/OUTDOOR STORAGE TOM THUMB/BLACKHAWK PLAZA C. Conditional Use Permit, Tom Thumb, to Allow Outdoor Storage in a Commercial Zoning District on Lots 4 and 5, Block 1, Blackhawk Plaza Addition Located Along the North Side of Diffley Road in the Southeast Quarter of Section 20.-At its meeting of July 28, 1992, the Advisory Planning Commission considered an application from Tom Thumb Stores for a conditional use permit to allow outdoor storage at its Blackhawk Plaza location. For additional information with respect to this item, please refer to the Community Development Department staff report which is enclosed on pages 7,2 through for your review. Also enclosed on pages gcthrough 76 are the Advisory Planning Commission minutes relative to this item. The APC is recommending denial of the application. This item was continued at the City Council meeting of August 4, 1992 to permit the Council and Advisory Planning Commission to meet in joint session to discuss the outdoor storage requirement. That meeting was held on Tuesday evening, November 24. At that time,the ordinance interpretation was clarified between the two bodies and action was given to staff to return these items to the Council for consideration. While minor modifications of the body of the outdoor storage ordinance were suggested, the principal code elements relative to these items remain unchanged. In addition to the information provided in the staff report and the Advisory Planning Commission minutes, City Code Section 11.40, Subdivision 4(c) states as follows: a) Outdoor storage items shall be placed within an enclosure. b) All such enclosures shall be attached to the principal building except in a limited industrial district. c) The enclosure shall be made of material suitable to the building and the items to be stored (Council and Commission interpreted this to mean the same building materials as the principal structure). d) The enclosure shall not interfere with any pedestrian or vehicular movement(The Council and Commission interpreted this to mean that no storage could occur on sidewalks). ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny an application for a conditional use permit to allow outdoor storage in a commercial zoning district on Lots 4 and 5, Block 1, Blackhawk Plaza Addition as presented. SUBJECT: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT APPLICANT: TOM THUMB STORES LOCATION: LOTS 4 & 5, BLOCK 1, BLACKHAWK PLAZA (1815 DIFFLEY ROAD) EXISTING ZONING: NB (NEIGHBORHOOD BUSINESS) DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: JULY 28, 1992 DATE OF REPORT: JULY 16, 1992 COMPILED BY: COMMUNTIY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT APPLICATION SUMMARY: An application has been submitted requesting a Conditional Use Permit to allow outside storage on the sidewalk in front of the Blackhawk Plaza Tom Thumb store located on Lots 4 and 5, Block 1, Blackhawk Plaza. BACKGROUND: On November 19, 1991, the City Council adopted Section 11.10, Subd. 29c of the City Code to regulate outside storage in commercial and industrial zoning districts. In an effort to give businesses time to comply with the new ordinance, the City Council allowed a six-month grace period before requiring all outside storage to comply. COMMENTS: The applicant is proposing outside storage in front of the brick Tom Thumb store that will include seasonal merchandise (i.e. salt pellets, firewood, windshield solvent) in a "corral style" enclosure made of treated lumber, as well as an ice cooler and an approximately 3'x 3'x 6' propane cylinder cabinet. Outside storage minimum standards set forth in City Code Section 11.10,Subd.29c include: 1. Outside storage items shall be placed within an enclosure. 2. All such enclosures shall be attached to the principal building except in the light industrial district. 3. The enclosure shall be made of material suitable to the building and the items to be stored. 4. The enclosure shall not encroach into any established front building setback or . other required setbacks. 5. The enclosure shall not interfere with any pedestrian or vehicular movement. 6. The items to be stored shall not exceed the height of the enclosure. (77 • 7. The display area shall not take up required parking spaces or landscaped areas. & The display area shall be surfaced with concrete or an approved equivalent to control dust and erosion. The surface shall be properly maintained to prevent deterioration. 9. The square footage of outdoor display areas shall be included in the calculation of required off-street parking for the principal use of the property. The applicant has not provided an enclosure for the propane cabinet or ice cooler. The seasonal merchandise enclosure is open on top and in front. The suitability of treated lumber to a brick building shall be determined by the Advisory Planning Commission and the City Council. Also, the proposed storage location is on the pedestrian sidewalk in front of the store and encroaches into the established front building setback which is measured from the building foundation. FINANCIAL OBLIGATION - 20-CU-16.6.92, Lots 4 & 5, Block 1, Blackhawk Plaza Based upon the study of the financial obligations collected in the past and the uses proposed for the property, the following charges are proposed. The charges are computed using the City's existing fee schedule and connections proposed to be made to the City's.utility system based on the submitted plans. Improvement Use Rate Quantity Amount None • If approved, this Conditional Use Permit shall be subject to the following conditions: 1. The Conditional Use Permit shall be recorded at Dakota County within 60 days of approval with documentation provided to the City. 2. Outside storage items shall be placed within an enclosure. 3. All such enclosures shall be attached to the principal building except in the light industrial district. 4. The enclosure shall be made of material suitable to the building and the items to be stored. 5. The enclosure shall not encroach into any established front building setback or other required setbacks. 6. The enclosure shall not interfere with any pedestrian or vehicular movement. 7. The items to be stored shall not exceed the height of the enclosure. 8. The display area shall not take up required parking spaces or landscaped areas. 9. The display area shall be surfaced with concrete or an approved equivalent to control dust and erosion. The surface shall be properly maintained to prevent deterioration. 10. The square footage of outdoor display areas shall be included in the calculation of required off-street parking for the principal use of the property. 11. All applicable City Codes shall be adhered to. • • • 2 N •- •i s in \, ,� • I N be il. e: , 1 \ "'":4:e....7%. . 4i. - v ...., a G , s 1 `i �1 f, - ss 1 .,� V'1 - -tom--------- F 1 I1 I 6•.•.r• s .:�. ,•. , . « • • . 1 . qtr i.,T . •: ' %• L 1 . .. 1t .. t • •• •211,- , . 4 1 .. J 1 at#a gw . • I I ( 1 I 1 ■■■■ .: *t . 1 � •a_ ig •g1 .7g s ....... I • I . I \II. le 156 VI it 71i Y �! a' r i • w w=� a i Y j '1 ' 1I I I , �:� U t If 1p I to : ' " ; 4 CO I 1 • 1 I .:..I .J IN 1 I• s1 w'• is .•.•••:i• 1 c.:),N ss „�— —°, •• r t It In. • i # i i w i fi •we* • i,.. NJ 1 a . . 1 �= t. __; '"'"'"111.1.11.1111.11111111111r+ • a ' c© / 1 I Ii I.:'‘'.5 . •• j 11: / 1 I i; • '1 .---t-'. • , r Y! 1 • 1y• 1 «11/1.4."*"—••••.. •C?14; I a , a &C �C i . i t 1'., j 4 ii I 1 i' .$ • .. ! •v"• . Ili 2 t • is go -,.. 4 'IL. ........ I 1 • F CD • u I � • I Lk V ' SUBMITTED BY APPLICANT c e . M. ICItIsili. 1 (- e„..- d ..- 10 t - 4 t t• ig.,1 G;t 1 ''. tillesk G _ ,--- „............ _...._ , . c__________,,,„4 Leer quality. . -it's your merchandiser . . it's our 25-year reputation. odel 40, Slant _ 1;iA,_',./R 1 -This attention-getting- 1 -*t=outdoor ice merchandiser coffers compact size yet large capacity inventory to assure .impact sales with increased ��E� ..profits.Full two-inch thick. a,;- -. fronded polyurethane i ,insulation in all walls.tops. SPECIFICATIONS: 1�r i end bottoms easily protects e 1 ti -your inventory. MODEL 40 10 - — Graft SO Sags 140 110 Approx.Cu.Ft. 40 S III Door Sin 27's17* 1rrdT Outside NslgM SOW .1W Outside Width SOW 7T Outside Depth' SSW 35W »4 Cold WMI Weight./ 106 dM 1Vlodel 60, Slant AaloDefrost Wtt 31$ 41$ s Compact profitability.direct CMnp000eMmps %HP'I1!<V %HPI11�V r i . - -- consumer awareness and appeal is evidenced in this 11 12 �. pow au"; ,: space-saving Model 60 ice 'ewrwriir--.- L .�wr.r�.ar.�wre.wr..IrxMTrr.rn► T merchandiser from Leer Thew�wN�wr�r*w�w�►ow�rwrwwrhrr r' r..sr.rurnr.w.iw.M�.wep�.�r.+s�wrrwrawrw�.wr. large.embossed.stainless steel doors feature welded edges and easy access- .� Leer Manufacturing Company,Inc. il �� 1�� 'i r P,0-Box 206 (608)562-3161 J. I'% r']. �( 206 North Leer Street W AT S(800)356 5764 National New Lisbon.WI 53950-0206 (800)362 5711 Wisconsin •ii?.. - twrli BY APPLICANT • .. - -- ...—.7111 24 '92 10:47W1 .- .• P.1 . . •Strang,Durabk Construction • • , Cub.*Turbo's cabinets have pmven themselves aroma and more durable than any others presently on the market. Three shelf 27 cylinder model- - 'Dimensions: 4CI"st 40"x 71": ; • -Constructed of 12-gauge steel •Welded Construction . - •Weighs approx.475 pounds •Time mesh shelves • : ! • •Holds 27•20#cylinders •Two mesh doors with padlock hasp II . Also available with the same high quality contraction are: • Two shelf II cylinder model • • • . : - One.sheit 9 cylinder model ,. . 12 cylinder forklift cylinder storage unit. . 1 ' • . ; •Iligh Quality Paint ■ . . i . . Tilts cabthets are printed and pahued with the highest quality Epoxy paints. ! .. ; . -Standard cabineu painted white • • - • . . . ... - -Special*aka for company colors • : 1 1 . . : a ; . I .. •Sitnaif '. a , i .. • • • We affix three 140 National Fire?rowan signs,StruproPans signs.and one no: 1 - smoking sir. There is a solid,flat plats apple%12"x 36"above the top door which your adverdsentent can be added(paint or decal for cylinder nachangc). , . - . • . • ,. . „,,!....-..,......, ..• , . . ...._ 0 ,r. • .../ift■ir-,1 .. _!,,,.. 4:-,_ ;........ i. ..--s': •.:t-,;•114.,..irtkilf 4,711,;11,..- -••iiii . .--• ' 47 7- 1: Nr •-•■...WI"f , , , . _-ss.:,..,T.:. • 1 I i . _ .., :. - ....ziiire .::•.f.i.'.+... .--- 1....44;.:„ .714,2, . .7 '-'1- .: ":::::, I • .tIft"I •I c•-••-...-.• *-.V4I f-•" . "w'r•iiV * '. .. i'' ''..:....r,. .....A.: %; E: ...„....., i • .-t-• ifti .,‘ . ,:i%•..1: •i..,■,,:‘N • .'‘' -''-.-''• : 3:ii.6•Ji:r. *.f .47:1C.•'•4* ... ••••--t - --•"...t..A.4 i !.' 1 • -ft... .. -.N' •••,?•;r4 tr: . _.‘„:1'2:i,-... ' 49 —',--,.k -ilk .'i:-;•:',..•,.•,;- ,L...>•••,,, 0 'I-.-, ---; .- ,!..,:r. ,,i...s.,. ...,..../".../......‘......pni"t t t • . 1 I strP+147: f". k'''.1,-(7-•t.....;:i'-- . +c!'' / 4 i, ,,p„,;.- .•._---J.'.-.!',...,..r 'F t ' . . :if7./„.:-. :-., .. / , -•7...(.44 -.. :--r....:;;;.f•-•U. t.. !Alf- i'. 11.,...-i--.---.1.....,-.;-.-- •1 ,••• ... ! . , ...,A Ili f-1 gem f r.'...0-....Z. , . •■••■■■...■ 4 1.4.1.1.,,ilf...,,27.4„,1.....n.t, .,. .•.. , . !I .,1t, .. - ..os •-'-,? ;• :--.._,,t .4 ...,,,./..•";-;-- "*....,_ ill, F..::i'li ....,,''". -11._-..--:;:-.-:-...:-'..%.t ,,„,, ••••■ •,,,. •-• . ■•'.7.- ;',.5.• i'-' . . t ,_ -.- ,...._.' I . - . - - • 1 1:I*;•:k• '‘4 ')I'''-; '-..-•...i. / i,..,,Ps=" 'rtiLl.,_.1,,, ,-,.%**P"'r. I1 .•4,,.:'.it, ,`,;.41P4...,2,;,, 4 .:*.". 1 • n 1 •.••• J.....ri .4-1414`fai-f.•.•1,-..Oki:-Ax-ir..“ • •' ,t •t•-'1.4-f!..4'-;:-. 4,i.•+:—_,2,p, • • ,.. _ • t • • t•-......4.,v,s:t7;4'.. ,,,,,•,-;.,-.(...1, '..-:., .44;cf......;.',P''-..•..„. - -•--.. 71,-; ' . 12 cylinder Watt cabinet• • I .,...:7 :•• ..?.*•-• "Pr; 1 ' . oi&43e apathy)• :: • , .. . 1 • a cylinder cabinet • ' ; • I. (tee 20•33•431 tanks) . i . • .' • 1 : • i . I , • • . • •. . : -- . ' . .Ailt ,'.....-'.7 • -..-:- ..,.-e-%,ti ja:S.H.L.,1 .„f T.....-, ,?6,-;;.-,... O' ...li,1"7 14-1, -\ki....3'?4,7‘..7!."7.-\-Pj.n.-a-Tei:r'"X"- ! 4 •-, -'4,..§7.'• .-f.., . - .:,.,,,,-. ..,-- :.-0_,...-....,t••• ,•,17,,' \l'., -t, 27 cylinder cabinet . • 'di.. I. .. .f---..,l' ,_ .--'..•":-'4._.. -:-:-VI -04. ,. .7-• -'-' ' . _ (tor 201 Links) - . ' yo-1 -, ,.-.,11). .-.-. - ., . . - .51,,; ,1 ?lt, •-,.- 4C--:$13),t• 4.1i . ••' in'--..-f,q . • ! , :r:,..44•,: - •v.‘,, • . ,;,„416-m , ,:j,-. .: ., '... '1.2 - - :.•-.‘...-_-.. • -4 .3,1 • , ; • ''' '.'t.i,14- .. .•v '. .,14-cd.4,. ti,•. .• .). '...i.... ... -24- - :::!;.:.-- '. 'r III-- • -.....' •A . i#:-:-; 1 ._,T '•`i... .:1,„■::: rfi..,:zis- , ./-,: IA, •-•;.• ; .....-1.t,..u,..-.-.t.r;-..,, , I •,:.:4.rEf.a..7 , ? ••.4.7,-1-•?--. A .. ' ..;.,Zeiliv.,;° i •"*.V41.r-ir•,-.: •..•a':''.. ' .1 Si' 44.I. .. ',"(f '1.-,r,t".!..-.4...- -.1 :..-4A!{ .• •:...% t.mr3/4 s. ,i ,-. -, ..,.; eiii .i. .,e.i,Ir•r-1,:.:vi.„: --'.. - ,,. 4. 41,1, .•,- . • , , v. .trt, :::- -P.),P,Ti.k.i.s.;,v...."-1.-.^.rf.-.:`,:., ...,t I , i . . . ril.,,._... 44:.....- % .f.1,*.el, .4,0 ■.. .;:..41. .";. 1., •s .4‘.!!1•• "- .r•- •;i:'‘..i f.10,L-4 . ' -.‘,1!..„ 1, 1 .-•..-:11::-.._„e::.iiis.v. -.:::...d,:y,..;•, ) . -. •ifi., 'si... • , ,.„ .1.1-„r 1: . ir:', , S ).7.14:::{1::::( 1.Its:41% ,r.-..;-11' : r; 1,-.1.14 j'A,t. .1-'•'....::''1.. !I il r,!%•v•Jel, V,4 i.a'11,•._,• _: .., ..4.a. _,,- IL-. ,'s•4•+•• ..--411---Li•Ar .I • ,.,.. z•A t •.''sa• •:• :• .! ti, ;:strit".-.. ..•14;,14.•,,•tie g ...t'':,:it.':.V1-W4te? . faa,,,,:i_c..2.) . • 4 ti • . . . . . , ...c.....„. ..:„ , .. ....• .• : .: .......:...i:. ti ;,.: 27.. goinder......„:14,,cab.. inat. ,,, .• ,..,12?„,z.... . .. .. . :.i• Ai ....,.::•.:.•.,... 1, !„..,•tt.141: . , .4:::::::-, .s.v.40„... . got 201 mks) IS cylinder abbot• .,..1„__1 sb.,_• ' • -::...e.-:',4701•4-,),,t4•'- -.:!"...- -%T.J. :' . • fee 20•33•ON 1.44 I'.7"4.6r C UF44 .1 :',a . ''':1 :/11.1\.:-'I?,t:;.1-•-41-k t'''? I. • (tor 20•33•43e onus) 1 • • . licaslisiumainemommaminas.. inemennseamaimummannimmounge •, . . ... ,i• • EX4ii/714; .• t : • . . • • • • SUBMITTED BY APPLICANT q-3 . , • i VI ' •1 11 tbc lQ' I V. V IV 1 i In W k� V—4l • I 0 0 • • alt Z SUBMITTED BY APPLICANT O JUL 29 '92 12:16 SEVERSON,WILCOX & ShENDON C Om pee • Page 8/EAGAN ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES JULY 28, 1992 TOM TUNA : CONDITIONAL USE P=RMIT Chairman Voracek opened the next public hearing of the evening regarding a Conditional Use Permit to allow outdoor storage in a commercial zoning district on Lots 4 and 5, Block 1, Blackhawk Plaza Addition located along the north side of Diffley Road in the SE 1/4 of Section 20. City Planner Sturm mentioned that this application is basically the same as the previous, except a different location. Tim Wandzel, a representative of Tom Thumb, mentioned that at this Tom Thumb store there is U shaped protectors against the sidewalk to prevent cars from parking over the curb. Again he felt that they had meet all standards of the City Code. Member Hunter stated that this application should be approved as there is not safety hazard. Member Hoeft stated that Tom Thumb already has propane stored outside the building. He observed pedestrians walking single file around the propane. He felt that adding more outdoor storage will only narrow the sidewalk even more and that this was not safe for customers. Mr. Wandzel .mentioned that there is S feet from the edge of the sidewalk to the propane enclosure. Member Graves felt that the applicant had met all of the standards. Griggs moved, Graves seconded, the motion to approve a Conditional Use Permit to allow outdoor storage in a commercial zoning district on Lots 4 and 5, Block 1, Blackhawk Plaza Addition located along the north side of Diffley Road in the SE 1/4 of Section 20, subject to the following conditions: 1. The Conditional Use Permit shall be recorded at Dakota County within 60 days of approval with documentation provided to the City. 2. Outside storage items shall be placed within an enclosure. 3. All such enclosures shall be attached to the principle building except in the light industrial district. 4. The enclosure shall be made of material suitable to the building and the items to be stored. 5. The enclosure shall not encroach into any established front building setback or other required setbacks. JULmw 29 '92 12:19 SEVERSON+WILCOX & ShENDON C 028 P09 Page 9/EAGAN ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES JULY 28, 1992 6. The enclosure shall not interfere with any pedestrian or vehicular movement. 7. The items to be stored shall not exceed the height of the enclosure. 8. The display area shall not take up required parking spaces or landscaped areas. 9. The display area shall be surfaced with concrete or an approved equivalent to control dust and erosion. The surface shall be properly maintained to prevent deterioration. 10. The square footage of outdoor display areas shall be included in the calculation of required off-street parking for the principle use of the property. 11. All applicable City Codes shall be adhered to. Member Hoeft stated that he was still not convinced that treated wood is a suitable material. He mentioned that if the City does not strictly enforce the City Code they are opening a floodgate of other similar applications. He stated he could not support this motion. Member Merkley stated that he could not support this motion for the reasons Member Hoeft mentioned. Member Miller also stated that he could not approve this application. Griggs, Graves and Hunter voted for; Voracek, Miller, Hoeft and Merkley voted against. Motion denied 4-3. A discussion occurred as to what constitutes "suitable material." gb Agenda Information Memo December 7, 1992 City Council Meeting BUSINESS NEW DANIEL DRIVE/DIFFLEY ROAD HUD PROPERTY A. Direction, Daniel Drive/Diffley Road Parcel--As a part of its purchase of the HUD property at Lexington and Diffley, the City was required to acquire a small parcel of property located at the southeast quadrant of Diffley Road and Daniel Drive. This property is dominated by low storm water ponding area and significant mature trees. The property is bounded by Diffley Road on the north, Daniel Drive on the south and west and the back yards of a portion of the Lexington Pointe subdivision on the east. As a part of the County's Diffley Road upgrade, the City's engineering and water quality divisions developed a pond design for the site. The residual property remained for other development if appropriate. As a consequence, the Community Development, Parks and Recreation and Public Works Departments collaborated in a review of the site and its potential development alternatives. Enclosed on pages $k through 92 is a memorandum from the Community Development Department discussing options relative to site grading and platting. Also enclosed on pages 9 3 through Allis a memorandum from the Parks and Recreation Department covering alternate developfnent programs which may or may not include a parks component. Staff is requesting direction with respect to the various options proposed. Essentially the issues before the City Council are: 1. Whether to develop the site with residential or park uses or a combination of the two. 2. Whether to grade the subdividable lots and/or park property with the pond grading contract or separately. 3. Whether the City should plat the property before sale or sell the property in unplatted condition to a private sector developer. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To provide staff direction with respect to the three public policy issues outlined above. 2' 7 M E M O R A N D U M TO: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES FROM: ACTING COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR HOHENSTEIN DATE: NOVEMBER 25, 1992 SUBJECT: PLATTING AND GRADING OPTIONS DANIEL DRIVE/DIFFLEY ROAD SITE Background This memorandum is a companion to that of Parks and Recreation Director Vraa and Parks Planner Sullivan regarding alternative development scenarios for the Daniel Drive/Diffley Road HUD site. As noted in that memo, staff had originally anticipated selling this property to recoup all or part of the initial purchase price for this parcel. As the County's Diffley Road project evolved, the site became ripe for sale or development. This raised several public policy issues which require Council direction. 1. Residential, Park or Combination Development - The Parks staff memorandum addresses the alternatives in this regard. 2. Extent of Site Grading - Whether the property is developed for residential or park use or some combination, grading will be necessary for the storm water pond which occupies the bulk of the site. The question which arises is whether to expand that grading project to include residential pad grading and/or parks facility grading at the same time. It is clearly more cost effective to combine the minor lot and/or park grading with the larger pond grading project. The question that this action begs is whether the City should plat the property prior to its sale. If the property is sold without platting, it will be difficult to phase and coordinate the larger, more cost-effective project with a private owner. 3. Platting Before or After Sale - The highest return and lowest costs would accrue from the City platting the project itself and coordinating the overall site grading. The City could then sell the platted lots to a single developer, broker or builder or market the lots individually. The public policy issue is whether this would place the City in an inappropriate position with respect to the private development community. While the City is not in the private development business, it could be considered to be in competition with the remainder of its development community. An alternative interpretation is that the City is only considering this action because of the unique aspects of the HUD transaction and it is in the constituent's best interest that returns to the public investment be maximized. Analysis With respect to the grading issue, the site's development costs can be best controlled by expanding the pond project to include the general site grading including building pads as shown in Exhibit A. This will also insure that an overland drainage swale and the drainage easement areas are in place and conform to the City's needs. Such grading would also permit the establishment of more desirable walkout lots. In addition, since the preliminary grading plan reflects mostly cuts, coordination with the larger Diffley Road project would afford a market or use for the excess material. In the alternative, individual lot grading may save a slightly larger number of trees as shown in Exhibit B. This is not assured, however, since individual homes may still clear the bulk of the trees to permit construction and drainage improvements. it would be necessary under this scenario to make such improvements as the overland drainage swale a condition of a future owner's development rather than installing it immediately. The larger related issue is whether the City should initiate platting on its own, as the County did on the Hadler Park Planned Development, or sell the parcel to a builder or developer for this purpose. While such a sale would remove any perception that the City is developing in competition with the private sector, it may be a formality since there appears to be only one logical and efficient development plan for the area. This is because utility stubs for the first five lots were provided into the property at 85 foot intervals during the construction of Daniel Drive. The final three lots can be served by an oversized service intended for the previous townhome zoning for the property. Since the pond shape and volume are known, the only developable area remaining abuts Daniel Drive. There is also an issue of extra liability if the City acts as a developer in the event that lots need to be warrantied. Since it appears that all grading on the site would be cuts, however, this liability would be relatively low. As noted in the Parks memorandum, the property cost about $140, 000 as a part of the HUD purchase. The potential recoverable value of the unplatted property would likely range between $60, 000 and $80, 000 due to the large proportion of the site being retained for ponding, while the value of the platted property would be approximately $225,000. Again, as noted in the Parks memorandum, development of a vest pocket park on two of the residential lots would reduce the recoverable value by about $107,000 to approximately $118, 000. These estimates must be weighed in the context of the policy issues outlined above. 0? Summary and Conclusion It appears that a substantial financial value exists were the City to grade and plat the site and sell the lots in the private market. The site is extremely small and the circumstances under which the City would consider its development are very unique. The City Council could find that these circumstances and the financial interests of the City and its Park Site Fund justify this approach. In the alternative, the City Council may wish to not be perceived as a property developer and attempt to sell the unplatted property with conditions and performance guarantees to ensure that City requirements are met. A ing Community Development Director 90 • EXHIBIT A 1 11 11 ■ . • I, -I : -• . • I 1 , • ■t.. ' 1 . , - N...., • - ----,---7.—"-------i ' c<:, ',,:` "---,----_____■----------2------.: - ----1 . , / *.. . . s / ,,,//. ' /f '' 0...1,.,„.1,,, t ,...-..- ri 1 s .7.4001 i. 1 • ' . . 1 /..' /-0I .1 . 1, . -t I 1111r-: . I i ..y I ..„.1 1.I 4 4 ;`-- . 1 _ . • -,, 9,2 i . g 1 -V,,,' .-y4 ,/,', -; - .,,./.. . e 21 .r. •A - , IS .. 1 I 1 ( ' „i" 'el t s: . (/ iiii i \:\ )11.40 ; .1 / I .c-?:: *),:z. .. \ , '14.611&.1 , i ; ..-• °, ,, ..„, ' w•;.•,( - ..,7:74- --F."-•••:„-----..;:x . •..-.. . . ..e I -. i i'/.-///,' - ,- ---__----::::".•_.,---...-----, N,. :6!\ ,%....„...,.) I0 / -.4-**■:---- 4,.---Z.,--:.--s--;i-' 4'. -N> .-- E, / All ; i - .. .... . • ..,, • - 2 i - :......c),' , // r') / /7 \,xlik,, . i:::: iki i 14 1 --P--z•----- ---- 7,,5 ....c( 1 ■ I 1 1 --, ----- / / ,/ _ _......._, . A-A. -------__0.-_- - ---J, ------- .r, ..,; \! • . ------1-----.., ----. -'-... / .il . ,I4. ! -------_______ ----, ----..."---__ ------ / /C- \I 1 rIUj , I / A /. • - . . i : 1 ' rn Ilti ‘ N \ e• .s.1% 1 ' t! 1 1.--j N i' , ••■., , CD cr i `\,,j : IP/' W • I I %I, Hit 4 4!.'■ , i * II \ A - ? ! . .4., • - -I , ,, ® • I i .r.-4:_:i.:k. \ 1 '-‘ i.- ? !I ) -4 -4 ..!. III 111 I • I ---,--z--____ lid] - • '11 = , , , . i / ' .- i ----------/om__„ . ., 1 i , ,-• „-, , - ), ' , it ' I --, 4, R\ ,_, :' ./- / 4C --.1 ) . , "?' / 1 I 1. 1 I 1 I .' / ■ .. ... ...."-- '...-_ -• 4,3 ) 04 , ., I • I , - 9 / _ ; •:.. t' Orr - e n DANIEL DRIVE Asso es. f,. 6 OAS*S M c a h ye I reon & ciat Inc. PARK DEPARTMENT PROPERTY cquctto. co.. • CITY OF EAGAN ...CS I. Awn. 1 Engineert•grebi eeeee•PI eeeee s•Sorveyere tell tan••••••••...me•Iles.,46..1111 MIMS•01.3314140 •• Wa-•D^0,I OM RXRTRTT R j 'I- I I II 111 : Ill 11 1 I i !'11 1..- , ■ I . , .. -- p...._1___ --.1 -----------Th 1 , ! - --- 1 • ‘'''',,,,,,. ' ., - N i , ... i -■-• / ' - , \ ,..1:-= 7: - / A ''' * ' — I ,. . . ...,., n - i 4.'''' 1 - --------;1, 4, - 1 -:, -,, .....;! ---,. ,..,, 71-1. 1\\\';\itir 7:' 11 '',:''ct 1.,r--,1 '1:1- i i ' 1 .: ...i 1 ,H,,,,__ - , 1 m m ..---,._-) ,,-.- „, 1.1:. I I-- m , ',.,* .. l(Dc' ) \1,--kmo i Si1 . ,1Z' '''` : ': „.1,• w,IA' ...,„\)L 1;1- 1-H,Ik`,■PU.,ii 1-: cp ; ;, , l• ,e' , oi. ',.,r: ,,,,,. ...., . . ... , , , ..0 . t. ..(,,,..,....v. : : , - :111 , .17= .. • Jac, ,. .' ..`3), ' "; - ' . / - ' • er,..,• • — 0 ---, t.... z .. ,, . li ' ' i. / •r . ,, ': '• )ici. ,, , % '‘-., ----...--=---=7..---t: ' •-, -..„,.. -...,...•-..... \,,_, . '11::::.......".1..3 -.......---::.__,.. ....=IT--„:„.'..-i....,,Z.,,,:::1/4\;::,,,,k 4,,,,r, • 1\L(11' ■ I' '.. 7 _ / bt, -..,.-:74,::::,-,---::::„.\\:\k P 2.'0.7;44' ■ - • ''k 121V.,11 ':-- ii , I I 1 1/:' I NJ \:k. \wc- ..11 ;-.)iii, 1 : 1 / I / .il, ‘, A;1.1_, •1 il---/_ ,______, / z / „po k 1:,. I \I 1 11 ,1 1 m A \ ''' kr ' ' ' ' / -1, .., - ?-' , /- , ,,, 1 , 1 - ' ' 0--- --------,---- ------_--'-----_, '-',/ /-c- '',','\1'\'\i , , ',. -,t, _,ri 1 N' Y: ' ,:,11.-‘4`i 11; /11'Il')).1"1. .-:11';11,illlii111:11-1-l'it:': 1 7..( : --------1-3-R-7).:--T-----:-H,..i\---- N' ‘,..\\,/ :I"' ''' I 11.1 1.11 I I- .11 ' . P ••••/' // / / 1 AA 11:-\*N m > ; l'..1.a . i .,-. r . - ' t----/, N) / , 1 I . - , t •,.. / L.+ m ' i . cf I., HA . 7 . N) . \ VI f';' ; . ‘■C. .- 1 - , , , • N 4, , . , ..„. ..s , ,,I.._ -1 -.:''i,;••■1._ r —" . ,II. i- ' : • .1 . s ' , I - --, ,i/ I -,. 7_ -0 - , 7_ . i - --Z---____ .—_____ // I 1 I I z .i.2.. /= ' ' ' i !' ■ /, I '---1------. 7 I . ) i • , ''',■ / / // . ..v , -, i t. t .,,t, • _ t : - ,/ , . / it' / i•I i ., c...-..-- *„ t. •iC ../ /, iti■i %W.!: r..--- k 1 . 1.1 1 ■ ■• ,:,: '''.: .:Ei /' ilil 1.-Ict,fLt, -:, „ -- E ,, p• Orr DAN I EL DR I VE yo PARK DEPARTMENT PROPERTY iates,Inc. _--- - - : MA Schelen Meeron I -- '''''''' l'!:74” - Assc CITY OF EAGAN ----'"'--.• '''-^'"' '.....'.,-., -.,,- — , . MEMORANDUM TO: TOM HEDGES, CITY ADMINISTRATOR FROM: KEN VRAA, DIRECTOR OF PARKS AND RECREATION STEPHEN SULLIVAN, LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT/PARKS PLANNER DATE: NOVEMBER 24, 1992 RE: PARKS NEEDS STUDY DANIEL DRIVE/DIFFLEY ROAD PARCEL Issue The City Council is asked to review and determine whether the referenced parcel should be used for single family development,parks development or a combination of the two land uses, and how the property should be disposed. Background The subject parcel is located south of Diffley Road and east of Daniel Drive (See Figure #1). The parcel was acquired from H.U.D. as a required residual property with the Lexington/Diffley athletic site purchase. Originally, the parcel was approximately 7.2 acres costing the City approximately $19,100.00 per acre including all assessments. Additional assessments have amounted to approximately $110,000.00. Total acreage has now been reduced to approximately 5.6 acres as a result of giving road right-of-way for both Daniel Drive and County Road 30. Also, a large portion of the site is within a storm water ponding easement which was in place at the time of the acquisition. At the time of acquisition, the parcel was zoned R-4 and was subsequently down zoned to R-1 with the intent the property would be sold. The development of property west of Daniel Drive has directed additional storm water to the subject parcel. Staff has been working with O.S.M. consulting engineers preparing a pond design to accommodate the additional storm water volume (See Figure #2). The pond design parameters were to 1) provide the storm water volume, 2) improve water quality, 3) preserve a majority of the significant trees and 4) allow for the resale of up to eight single family lots to recapture a portion of the initial acquisition costs. The construction of the pond will occur with the upgrade of County Road #30 in 1993. The Advisory Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission, at their October 1992 meeting, reviewed the pond design and had the opportunity to discuss the concerns of several attending residents. The residents inquired whether a portion of the property could be purchased by the abutting homeowners. In addition, they expressed their preference for utilizing the parcel for parks purposes instead of residential lots. Residents stated that the current parks are too far away or not safely accessible. The Commission requested that staff meet with the residents and that this item be returned at their November meeting. Parks Needs Study Daniel Drive/Diffley Road Parcel November 24, 1992 Page 2 On Monday, November 2, staff met with three residents representing two adjacent properties. The residents had contacted approximately 12 neighbors informing them of the meeting. The following are concerns expressed at that meeting: 1. The residents preferred that the parcel be used for the preservation of the trees with a small area along Daniel Drive being used for a developed park. The park should include playground equipment and a hard court. Preferably, no residential lots should be placed within the property.One resident in attendance suggested a revision to this no residential development preference. This scenario simply omitted several residential lots for the park and provided for residential development of the remaining property abutting Daniel Drive. 2. A loop pedestrian wayside trail be placed at the oak knoll connecting to the proposed bituminous trail along County Road 30. 3. The residents also asked that the City consider selling a portion of the property to the abutting homeowners should there be interest. 4. Thatpedestrian circulation be evaluated and modified to promote safe and effective linkage to the City parks and schools. This includes a re-evaluation of the Daniel Drive trail which was proposed but eliminated at the request of residents two years ago. The group also discussed other park amenities which were not seen as being necessary elements in this proposed park area. Concern was expressed for safe pedestrian traffic along Daniel Drive. High traffic volumes on Daniel Drive to Diffley raise concerns as to roadway width, striping and signage. The Advisory Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission revisited the item at the November 1992 meeting. Reviewing the neighborhood's concerns, the Commission recommended that a portion of the property along Daniel Drive be utilized for a vest pocket park and that staff provide concept alternatives of the mini-park for Commission review at a future meeting. Staff has since prepared several concepts as part of this memorandum for the City Council. This preliminary planning effort indicates that a small park is feasible but does not address the Council's ultimate action determining whether a park is needed or the residential property is sold for single family lots. Alternative A/Sale of Lots Alternative A is for the sale of eight single family residential lots along Daniel Drive. The site is currently zoned for this land use. The Council may recall the downzoning from multi- -family which occurred after City acquisition. 9 y Parks Needs Study Daniel Drive/Diffley Road Parcel November 24, 1992 Page 3 Five of the eight lots are improved with sewer and water services implemented with the upgrade of Daniel Drive. The three northern lots are yet to be served. The platting of eight lots would place approximately 2.2 acres of the 5.6 acre site into a residential land use. The remaining area would be used for ponding and woodland/open space preservation. This 3.4 acre parcel would remain in public ownership. Staff believes that the five southerly lots of the eight would sell for no less than $30,000 each. The three remaining lots would sell for less,.given their location and proximity to the intersection of Diffley and Daniel Drive. Sale of the lots would recapture the investment of the Park Site Fund which was used to originally acquire this property. Alternative B/Sale of Lots and Develop Mini-Park Before evaluating Alternative B, the following information may help the City Council in evaluating the parkland need using the standards from the Comprehensive Parks System Plan. The subject parcel is located within the north central portion of Park Service Area 26 (See Figure #3). The Park Service Area limits include all the residential property west of Dodd Road, south of County Road 30, north of County Road 32 and east of County Road 43. The PSA limits were expanded with the rezoning from C.S.C. to single family as a result of the Lexington Pointe Additions. Staff estimates that the build out population would be approximately 4,700. The Park Systems Plan's standard for service by a neighborhood park is 2,000 to 5,000 residents. The Park Service Area is served by Walnut Hill Park and Trapp Farm Park. The entire park service population, including the subject parcel and neighborhood, is within 3/4 miles of these two parks. A major playground was recently installed at Trapp Farm Park. This playground is approximately 1/2 mile from the subject parcel. Pedestrian access would be along Daniel Drive to the Trenton Trail park access. Access to Walnut Hill would be along a future north/south trail corridor which intersects with the Highline Trail Corridor adjacent to Lexington Pointe 8th Addition (See Figure #4). The neighborhood and Commission's discussions regarding the vest pocket park concept includes a facility program with a playground, hard court play area and trails. The facilities' associated costs are: $20,000 for a playground, $3,500 for a hard court, $3,000 for trails, $3,000 for grading, $3,000 turf establishment, $1,000 site furnishings and $3,500 for landscaping. The development and facility total cost is approximately $37,000. Assuming a reduction of 2 lots at $35,000 each the development, facility and lost revenue cost would total approximately $107,000. 9s • Parks Needs Study Daniel Drive/Diffley Road Parcel November 24, 1992 Page 4 • The alternative of parkland development can be based on two scenarios. The first is the total utilization of the 5.6 acre parcel for parks and preservation purposes. This scenario would preserve additional trees along Daniel Drive,provide a greater visual aesthetic to the neighborhood,increase the visual curb appeal from Daniel Drive and allow for an expanded facility program with the proposed park. The fiscal consequence would be the loss of the initial investment, and offsetting revenues from lot sales and the additional development costs. The second scenario is one which blends single family lots and parkland development. Staff has prepared two concepts which meet the Commission's facility program,consumes two lots and utilizes the pond area as a parkland amenity. The Commission recommendation included a basic park facility program which includes a playground and hardcourt. Staff has added to this program statement with the following: • The park layout utilize visually and functionally the pond and surrounding wooded parcel as a viable parkland resource. • The park layout include trails to integrate facilities and increase accessibility to the site. • Additional facilities be provided if opportunities exist and associated development/operation costs are low. • The park layout preserves significant vegetation. • Reforestation is used to replace trees lost by parkland development for aesthetic enhancement and as buffers to undesirable conditions. • The park layout safely locates facilities in respect to adjacent roadways, steep slopes and pond. • Provide adequate buffer between parkland facilities and adjacent residential land uses. • Provide an effective park layout which is compatible with future residential development Parkland Concept A is located within the southeast corner of the parcel (See Figure #5). The park layout provides approximately 170' of frontage along Daniel Drive. The park's depth extends into the adjacent pond and woodland area. The facility program includes a playground, hardcourt, bituminous trial, soft surface trail, benches, picnic node and small open play area. 916 Parks Needs Study Daniel Drive/Diffley Road Parcel November 24, 1992 Page 5 The park layout proposes a hard court and playground off a central trail. These facilities are 40-50'from Daniel Drive,25'from existing residential to the east and 20'from potential residential to the west. These areas are proposed to be planted with an evergreen buffer to provide additional separation from the adjacent residential and roadway. A 20' x 50' open play area is proposed north of the hardcourt. A shrub hedge is shown north of the open play area to provide separation from the pond slopes The shrubs would not visually separate this space to the pond/woodland area to the north. A soft surface trail extends approximately 230' through the eastern woodland to a small picnic node. This trail would have little to no impact to the site as a result of its development. Benches are proposed adjacent to the playground and at a location which provides a long view over the pond to the oak knoll. The park layout allows for potential development of six residential lots to the northwest along Daniel Drive. Parkland Concept B is located within the northwest corner of the parcel (See Figure #6). The park layout provides approximately 230'of frontage along Daniel Drive.The park depth extends 500' easterly to the oak knoll. The facility program includes a playground, hardcourt, bituminous trail, soft surface trail, benches and picnic node. The park layout orients itself to a future pedestrian path which has linkage to the Highline Corridor extending to Walnut Hill and Trapp Farm Park. The park layout proposes a hardcourt and playground off a central trail. These facilities are 35'40' from Daniel Drive and 50'420' from Diffley Road. A 6' berm is proposed at the Daniel Drive/Diffley Road intersection providing additional separation. The playground is 20' from the potential residential to the south. These areas are proposed planted with an evergreen buffer. A soft surface path extends from the bituminous path through the existing wood to the Diffley Road Trail. An informal sitting/picnic area is proposed adjacent to the trail within the oak knoll area. The trail and picnic area could be developed with no impact to the oak woods. The park layout allows for the potential development of six residential lots to the southeast along Daniel Drive. Summary The acquisition of the subject parcel was based on H.U.D.'s terms of the purchase for the Lexington Diffley athletic park site. At the time of acquisition, this parcel was considered of no significant parkland purpose. It was supposed that this parcel would eventually be sold and these dollars returned to the Park Site Fund. Parks Needs Study Daniel Drive/Diffley Road Parcel November 24, 1992 Page 6 The question before the City Council is whether these past parameters have changed providing benefit to the City's current and future parkland needs. The City's acquisition of the parcel has provided benefit to the storm sewer infrastructure by allowing the development of a storm sewer pond. This proposed storm water pond improvement has provided residual benefit by preserving trees/open space,providing water quality benefit and maintaining a visual quality within the neighborhood. Since acquisition, the City's intent for land use has changed with the down zoning of the parcel from multi-family to single family. Since acquisition, the dynamics of change are evident for the Diffley/Daniel parcels the question is: Is there a need for a park? Should Park Site Fund dollars be prioritized for acquisition as well as development? According to the Comprehensive Parks Systems Plan, Park Service Area #26 meets a majority of the City's parkland service standards. The Advisory Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission, in their review of the Lexington Point 8th residential subdivision, concluded that no additional parkland was necessary to meet the increased residential development within Park Service Area #26. This is not representative of the Commission's current recommendation to include a small park with the remaining residual area being utilized for single family lots. The development of a vest pocket park would service the immediate neighborhood and provide additional benefit by its integration with the preservation space associated with the storm sewer pond area. For City Council Action The City Council may consider the following recommendations: • The parcel be platted for eight single family lots.The revenues generated from those lot sales be returned to the Parks Site Fund or • The entire parcel be utilized for parkland/preservation purposes or • A portion of the parcel be used for a small vest pocket park. The remaining property adjacent to Daniel Drive be platted for single family lots. The revenues generated from these lot sales be returned to the Park Site Fund. KV/SS/nh N1/park1124.mem • • rwwuw...• .COUNTY • � STA TE ,. . t w ip t t �, 4- ,,, s'''..:::''44::1:',111111:11:11:11!Mitio" '"':::::"""o'lli:ili'll:::':::'.::#,::::...- rs*:.i,4- • • i y r sue _ w a. •;; y 14 M r l� b .43, `3 � i v 6444•k t itib.r *.'1''\* ..:-.-:;iiiiiii::::.iiiiiiiiii::M.:.!.::iiiiiiiii.i::;■iiiiiii:iiiiliii::iiiiiiii:.Z; ,. . -- � d d.• ..f....;d, .+ ++� ��' I � .,0,T H r/ ,�,•j - 3 �. ' 7.1 y� :11.84:E, :;11)As;LI!:• C V 1 - 04 41.6.- . \ 1 k!' N g r____!!!' ir 44i. - gleN 4. !.. .• . • .4% / 4iiik it i i,„, _ V. . ■ AN; / ,.,../, 1111e4r illkil?-1thl "IlliiiillrillPillb • II ear ' � • IM1 • I . A 'MM..'" I i [ • ' •O• . *NTH.. . Ies�ry�� Drawn ey: �'�,,rs Drawing Title ml.. 4CCA ate M Dat�: n1.074 41 aC19CW1 99 t • DIFFLEY ROAD 4. -- - -- -- -- T +w` c�e- , Y t.■ xlL b 2m < 1t�AU.... + . 1! \ 'MI 6ZieZ ;17 i I: .-.....-'illf..ph_ —ate—.040-Pr,... '_ ._ _ l '��• rW— �•_ �'�r— �t �r'.. rte `y.�: `i/ � � 1. ; \\.. T * \\\ I,`, f ,,. ` 11 \ "�R r - _ �� /. • ,, Ilin �1E• 1E ,.CMS 2NDi AD I.T I ♦ ��r.���� �`, , 14 s .,.:,,,, h.. .., /07/444‘..4-tt,aitr, ._4• •' J:i.f,`'` 4.;�>, '.:� /f , % );fir • / -.----.,444k 'Nr:-..Wilre, - - . I I - .7 /1(.3 / ...,*NW- , i I r . O�Hf / .. _ / - QA.En uz�Mv J ` . \ •v Ar (t)Ywi.\ ; \ 1 ii.)k ^\ w. `Ak64 / % .M Dr By: . to T Drawing Title ro , ,-�i "4 7.777- �y of ao �� El WOK No. ii/23111..- 41151144=1" /pv *z • i . • . _ . p . . ..........., ........ ...,.. ,.... . .. . . . • .. .. • . ..... . 21- .; • _ . . . . i .... . . . . .1... ....... . ... . . ....“... . .1 1 ‘.. ••■••., ‘ 1 • .• •• •. •• • *** . *••• •"*. * . keitTOMP4 omm.....aw .0P.... .; • • ... .. NM.. • / . .. 6642.114.• Or. • %NW *1/4 • •: . ... ? .1• a 3 - irSo 1 . - .. -_, "•11k..p xi 4. .-..-.- ...„. ...n.r, ,-..--reemelormi-.-.3.„-Tipl,....„"veystamort...,_ •rr,..-1115?.•--Trreprirer..4.....trm•4....gr 1•+.41;.•;ofirAtirre. .•:.••ovr ; r .... • ... *gm3ecr . . . z .V:7 I Ow MO ON, rbPael.. — •■.;:r 2 • _ ._. . . ._. ' FC eti-pikkAciep %Lac - • i I It, P.-6.A..YI/ •• . . ••.r • .*.•*--. 4 •.: Pectoemolit..zoNat.te•-‘ • i .81 •..r 7...., ., . - 111/2 9 • • • . • 4.4 -;.....4, .• - • 'I • - - I i - . iheAkT 4 ...:1,:lic•... 444.i. - ••'71 • . -- flire14. lowm.........—.----- / • • .**". 7: —- • 1 I ' --. - -••. . . II ... . '."' = b ■• • e• _ Irt ..4464t•idi . ...... - - -•• - 1 • • ip • • 4-- --f""I'111.1p re... . i• ..• •,r .••• r•-- .1 . • - - - ...a...W. Z. -: • - . .. . -• • ail% • - • — : vr . .. - .... • I . . . . • .. .... ". 7...-.i;) 3v . • • ri t .. . . . r - - .., . _ . . .., •1 .... . . .1..4 . .. • .. .. Ott • • -- ' ' • Pr 1 ...• peremet-.4 wow., qv-r:att.40":1112:• 17.%tt•...A,rx.g..•,..;2,.•';-.,,....- W........• 1g•. .:4:WV:*--••■"*..wr"'ng-tv.10,.?•..-:"-••"',' ".:::`.. VAL .. , . r.' • • • . _do? - r ) - • - .... \_._...r. • • 1.41 I t . ,• ... ... -. . - -- \ - 4.......,. .• - . • •.. ""*Ii I i • • . • .0.4 rj1 )<Ist,r-i,ulal. s%#7.°- Drawing Title Ft%./ib,.4t at. LIMITA "Wr."--' clty4wpanv . • ............ IV4/12- , roam so. lits /0 , • -- ------ - , • •I J • ..._ -1- .-... Aria . _ _____ ---- j- ?A _ ., Et p- - 9;-._- . _ .. __ • ,7 __. ----,.- 61 7= . -z E—! , ,• .'. " 'I - -' • • . ``--, ---1• —"'111 7:I._._ 1 '.... 1,...: .; , I _ ..„. . _:. ,.., . • •-6;7- 111 iii IMEN ii ..: , . . . ..„,„,,,,z....... •:* - - --, _, ,i-, -- ..-- .: 4, _,..--L-7. i-i,- L-J--. , - ----- ' .-- ' ' '.' ° . ilabilli 1. ■ F.i; 174W 1-iI i 90 10' .•77%--.4f--, . 7/•-rs,i 1 V.: .,'•1 A '• • ....r " 'i . I ri -,- -..'L 74,7:•,.. .:1;) mil .ri .t ii*I ''' • ' ,— - 64,,i;3111'6 t , • 4 V' •,;,,, '' -..„, ,c,-.,:iltn *-1 =MI i ,.._ 4,,,, ..!-. 1 _ .., \., .; o.. .... •- -=*-, v • ° 7.7""a•-•,, --"1"..;;!--...t ,` '-'t - ' t. ....4 --e - '11-r- sill . ,,,N_h4._...„\alt, ..4.,....zo, i -..,,,',, 11 . • --- ‘, - - - • '"..'"c - 1. " . $ r• 1 - -ilgt \ - -, ,v- • - -81 114, f tt • .• IL - A •., -- -.- • r ,__. i - .., -"----:-I-,.., % -- ,,..•I Azgitp PA ‘ .tr 11 —•:,iT -t- - ._ .. iti — - _ .., - .--- ,A,a 1....c- "• ‘- 1. ' v• • - - I .,' • ' 1 — o',"--','(:1-. .-`: .. :.,LLi ,-,::e;\.4%. •s ..- , . 1411 V .„, , t• 2j4. Ig.1 I.-.- -4.--r-TF 'il'c i',0,\-4:s. .-...+: R. f :-. kttt ( . ..-„, . , ..i.li 1 .jew P --.'■:' n ' • - , " ' 4411 . i t IN‘g, _ ,-*---', ",4- .'-'C‘.c , N'' . -":1k• .' ‘1.. 1 i ,, ‘ \ 1111,, i'„..I i■:.k "S‘ ..l•Vi_ J ..1:-. ;1;- -.-F__.- .**•'.=,\" . lf, .. ' . . ':..k. L . -.st.q1ijv.' le .,..... ....,7:*:-...-77,V,,,, 1.,L., . , *. ' ,."). 1• . i • ' -"' -''.4 , .‘ ''., t'esow'77":" *. : - 40-' e,.... 1.1 r.);[4 te.'i I. -,• . -1 1-._3- ;A, ),f- .T,,, ; • .11,141 w • N.--..i'x' ,:'-f-'01.2•4-1 ,:--, - fri 46•1i7:: "'; ',.');."4, '/. '* -. '..." :\ • ." : 7'- ', P 404'.ii .`\ 1-. ' ' '- j 1 if 00"-- ;`,.;:)t,.'i- 4, . .', .t \ - .--, .. r'-NI. , • . I, ?",tit` 'km --: . , .. ISO - oie 11;:m- Imil.11:11:::. 1-6: .f ...*: v z7. 'di.i--: 1- g • \ -.,-.caw — 1-,t --.N. ,Aig.u.'w4■41. wan -in osho . v II Mfg .111 v._. 11..ve. i i MC I 0 MII IR allimil 41' I. c; ,.., k •;',.'.• • . - 011111-' ‘,1111 (1 / , ,Ai )1rA.,.ii„.0., I : .,..,. • _ • 4.. .er ;1: - lignffr4a ,,...Pil 1 i I l'. . _,,,;1--..tok.,.1 \ . ,t44% 4m• • -li. -.-1 k.. 1 -, ' priNrit-.- -. - ,r•t•V,I.,,Li. ....1 •1• II ,,,iii 1 e t,....., •- I -4 ir.i.la •••• . ' 1 ii --1 •v • • k il • ‘,;.;:if..k ' • 0 I • • 0 g ...- %lit - 1 . i 3 ' ..,,•:_-„r 414. ; ;r11- - • i , -• N4 1 7 • • 1 ••1 1 . s • 1 6 10 /6' O 0 •01, z I ‘..,i : .t. , / 1, A • 0 •1011P•••• E '.. t.I.T. . ,- .9 6 , i -. 'r.ic.:4--• f vf.; • i , e : I'L'.N1 ; •11 i,,-.;"y"sz .5,0.-'-- .1 L • i _10 rt.." • k ■F\ : '1!. / --p-- ..:..1 _ :f • „,.. I ,‘ •, , 1 lir tr.: _ '.-oi-,t A ir., 1 . . 1 S i .7 4r.-: . Mill ' / ,F; ; . cz...-- 'i , 7 1 •- , 'A%tb i • -,- i:".`174._ # ..i : --•-%; 40• •• ..adma _..... 0. . ■- -,-— ---'-r--- '_.;.' tt:AiK7/.r-_-: !I..=• _ — ____ ...,...------_---- -;---- "----iniz...... 0•Ak...,,,,,, _ __ , ox, ... Alk,",; ....e. ,:•,,.,.,.4 7.* I — _ — , . I/ i • I Drawn By: . ta 2pt...3..s.........„,.. 4. Drawing Title * "---- Date: Citlp CI aCkgan CO5)i FIGURE NO. I I IliCta. ‘115110011=6111 *4- , • 1")/ ..........____.‘ `��. i • ``� a `.. `\_ . fvt-IP - CIS `� = 2*4G) ft.• ifiNi A 4.1011../1114 ' ,...,..p _ Avorp., ,\\ ip.... 4114 4mir- #.0 4, ) .1 %%my*,♦` J . i i1;;rql , ccNc -r -AIL• isco=t a io, :, 1:46--[8 0 it /..,/,:y2 Drown p ?y Drawing Title Dote: LCICV a3 ' 11/1-W92- w J 1 noun so. #S • • o11TL� . eY M' eirwNUMOt73 - -f+L � \``,\VI;IIf illl 411111 IIIIL'11111tldHll/1 - �� Tr aft �11111t� !II!ttfirimlm'1�\� t _ . c______..._\- ,.,: f . ...,„„ err„,.It V.4' r , `` ,.............• , . - AIL — _a 1f-,,g� — Jp4. >�� �. .- Drown 8y: �,&J' �' Drawing Title ' qin sitz-Dote: CRY wagon FL4/ �.. No. It/'�-�a�t2 i Agenda Information Memo December 7, 1992 City Council Meeting 1993 FEE SCHEDULE B. 1993 Fee Schedule--Enclosed on pages /Q( through ,8 is a copy of the proposed 1993 Comprehensive Fee Schedule for the City of Eagan. Director of Finance VanOverbeke has coordinated input from all departments. Individual departments have identified suggested changes resulting from cost adjustments or policy decisions. It has been the policy of the City to adopt a comprehensive fee schedule each year in December for implementation on January 1. The enclosed pages show 1993 proposed additions and changes handwritten onto the approved 1992 Fee Schedule for comparative purposes. The proposed fees are intended to cover City costs and not to generate revenue over and above what is required to provide the service. They continue the City policy of implementing available and practical user fees, limited licensing and minimum regulation through the licensing function. The Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission has not completed its deliberations on Park Dedication and Trail Dedication fees. Those rates which also affect water quality dedications will be presented to the City Council at its December 15, 1992 meeting. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the 1993 Comprehensive Fee Schedule as presented or to approve with modifications. /05 CITY OF EAGAN PROPOSED 1993 FEE SCHEDULE To Be Effective January 1, 1993 City Council Consideration December 1, 1992 /"6 LIQUOR FEES 1992 • �qq3 FEE TYPE PEE BEER, LIQUOR AND WINE fro/ou 1 Beer Application and Investigation $350.00°) Off-Sale License 75.00 On-Sale License 350.00 Temporary License 25.00 Liquor Application and Investigation 300.00(2) o Off-Sale License 200.00 On-Sale License 4,000.00 Sunday License 200.00 ErS On-Sale Club License �arq Less than 200 300.00 201-500 500.00 501-1,000 650.00 1,001-2,000 800.00 2,001-4,000 1,000.00 4,001-6,000 2,000.00 Over 6,000 3,000.00 Temporary (Up to Three Days) 150.00 Wine Application and Investigation 350.00(1) On-Sale License 400.00 Sunday License 100.00 Consumption and Display 25.00 Daily Sports or Convention 50.00 Duplicate License 5.00 ("When Wine and Beer are applied for by the same applicant, the total maximum investigation fee is $400.00. (2)Also requires an escrow deposit of $1,000.00 for five persons requiring investigation and $200 for each additional if the investigation is conducted within Minnesota, or $2,000.00 for five persons requiring investigation and $400.00 for each additional if the investigation is conducted outside of Minnesota. 2 /0 7 1992 %CM FEE TYPE FEE Rubbish Hauler fforktIL Commercial, Residential or Recycling Only 1st Truck $50.00 Each Additional 25.00 Commercial/Residential Combination 1st Truck 75.00 Each Additional 25.00 Service Station 100.00 Solicitors (Non-Profit) 25.00 Solicitors (For Profit) 50.00 Investigation License Fee 25.00 up to 3 solicitors 5.00 each additional over 3 Trailer Permit 50.00 Dog License Male or Female 10.00 Neutered or Spayed 5.00 Late Fee 2.00 Duplicate Dog Tag (Also covers dogs 2.00 licensed in another city) Kennel Permit Initial 100.00 Renewal 50.00 Photocopies .50/page Fee Schedule 2.00 Animal Pick Up 15.00 . Animal Impound 4.00/day over amount billed the City by animal pound Pet Shop License 100.00 Returned Check Fee 15.00 � ,� False Alarm 3 Qkk f •o ar.'`% Commercial 75.00 Per False Alarm `0 After 4- (City Code) Residential i5.00 44,44. Per False Alarm After * (City Code) 3 Radio Communications Lease Previously Negotiated Rate New + 5% Fax Legal Size Documents 1.00 for 1 or 2 pages .50 each additional page lhV o:c:,61 ct .wts_ 3 15% (To MAIL: 110) Nsw Qtesewc t C i �� e Coras 20.00 / tvr IQ� NLw $syo.. Q►ew.l:l.a a:�a{o�t ffl kv.a ) • 1992 Q 3 FEE TYPE YEE teoi01)11 Alarm Panel 8.00/month Parade Permit Fee 25.00 Shows License 25.00 (circus, carnival, etc. ) 50.00 Investigation Massage Therapy Establishment 300.00 (includes 1 massage License therapist license) 300.00 Investigation (includes 1 massage therapist) Massage Therapist License 50.00 200.00 Investigation Police/Fire Reports: Accident 4.00 Incident 4.00 first 2 pages .25/ea. add'l page Arrest (weekly) 20.00/week Photos: 10.00/first print .50/print after first Tapes: Audio 25.00 each Video 35.00 each Fingerprinting 10.00 oo {b,:ct.-►^QQesatis Ch•..rCs / C ewe..ct Lei%eve 6.0O 03..4- L+,,.. Enc4 %L,..J.i Gambling Investigation 250.00 ANeacita) t.W Cigarette License 40.00 Mechanical Amusement 1-3 Machines 25.00/Machine 4-15 Machines 200.00 Total 15+ Machines 400.00 Total Contractors Licenses Plumbing MN Master License No. & $2,000 Bond & Certificate of Insurance Sewer and Water MN Master License No. & $2,000 Bond & Certificate of Insurance 25.oo N e..v X0 ? 4 Q) t e a 2 S.OD - o c04ty C A. �.o Ys.►4 vlst`1 #0 act.°w. A.%e1«A*t +L. c,.10b•tvt. 1��3 1992 PEE TYPE PEE Well Driller MN Master License No. & $2,000 Bond & Certificate of Insurance -6'*9.97Ae S4.4. 3<<o w Mailing Labels LOGIS Cost + $10.00 Notary Seal 1.00 Each for first 5 .50 each for all additional Voter Certification 1.00 Duplicate Certificate of Occupancy 5.00 Golf Driving Range License 50.00 Data Processing Reports LOGIS Charge + 10$ Dance Hall Permit 300.00 300.00 Investigation Public Dance - Single Event 50.00 Pawn Shop License 8,000.00 350.00 Investigation per owner Stable License 50.00 Hard Copy Map Sales 14°1/2 Section - property only $8.00 1/2 Section - property and planimetric $45.00 1/2 Section - property, planimetric and contours $136.00 1/8 Section - property, planimetric and contours $34.00 1/2 Section - aerial photo $5.00 1/4 Section - property only $5.00 The above fee schedule for updated property, planimetric, and contour maps is being presented for inclusion in the City's 1993 Fee Schedule. The total fee collected for the upgraded maps is returned to the County. All money which is collected by either the County, the City or Dakota Electric is collected in total and submitted to the County. The money collected for maps sold relative to Sections 10-36 is distributed evenly between the County, Dakota Electric and the City. The total money collected for map sales relative to Sections 1-9 by the County and the City is split eve I between the two entities. 1W SUBDIVISION AND PLATTING IVO 1992 FEE TYPE PEE Q1 eVoil9SAAL Final Plat $100.00 Require Escrow +$3/lot Deposits Per Development Escrow Policy Preliminary Plat 300.00 Rezoning 250.00 Planned Dev. 250.00 PD-Annual Review 25.00 Conditional Use Permit Initial 150.00 Renewal-CUP 25.00 Variance 75.00 Waiver of Plat Duplex Lot Splits 50.00 Others (Except Single 150.00 Requires escrow per Family Zoned Property) development escrow policy. Single Family Zoned Property 300.00 (No Escrow) Special Permit 50.00 Interim Use Permit 75.00 Drive& i a1r•tta.€.i Qvc : ft. 160.00 Grading/Excavation Permits If Preliminarily Platted 250.00 Not Preliminarily Platted 0-5 Acres $150.00 Each Acre Over 5 Acres $50.00/Acre ($550 Maximum) Renewal 150.00 Utility Permits as Utility Companies o�e�.• 10.00 Permit For Construction 20.00 f0.00 in City Rights of-Way (does not include residential boulevard 14o1st.►t:ui tree plant-iwo} awl. :vv;y,{:•w to- Assessment Search 10.00 Os3ciS!wt.►� F� O•. rt��.. wi.e•k 6:tti Sc.00 Rant 1Jea,.3 acation Proceedings 300.00 Industrial Revenue Bond and Multifamily Housing Bond Processing Fee 500.00 Market Analysis Study 50.00 6 'Mt Thtfrtw.aw+ Qrot.s1i...! Fta. / /I SOO.DO New 1992 1 q 4 3 FEE TYPE FEE trotosc.a- Zoning Map 5.00 Zoning Regulations (City Code- Chapter 11) 10.00 Liquor Regulations (City Code - Chapter 5) 10.00 Subdivision Regulations (City Code- Chapter 13) 10.00 Traffic Regulations (City Code- Chapter 8) 3.00 Parking Regulations (City Code- Chapter 9) 3.00 G\tekvA Sign Regulations 2.50 City Code Each Chapter (All Chapters Except 5,8,9,11,13) 5.00 Code Book 60.00 Code Book with Binder 75.00 City Code Updates 10.00 Street Name Change Application 100.00 Comp. Plan Amendment 300.00 Comprehensive Guide Plan Map 3.00 Water Quality Management Plan 50.00 Water Quality Classification Map 5.00 Comprehensive Storm Water Mgmt. Plan 50.00 (three ring binder) 35.00 (spiral bound) Trunk Storm Sewer Drainage Map 2.50 Comp. Water Supply/Distribution Plan 50.00 Trunk Water System Map 2.50 Comp Sanitary Sewer Policy/Plan 50.00 Trunk Sanitary System Map 2.50 Plans and Specifications 50.00 7 INSPECTION PEES I V13 PEE TYPE lPEE Pe o Q o ud- Building Permit Based on Value - See Attached Building Permit Fee Schedule Building Permits for Selected Work at Existing Residences: Basement Remodel/Finish 35.00 Deck 25.00 . Fireplace/Fireplace Stove 25.00 Demolition Permit 15.00 Disposal Permit 10.00 Electrical Permit See Attached Electrical Inspection Fee Schedule Heating, Ventilating and Air See Attached Mechanical Conditioning Permit Fee Schedule Moving Permit 15.00 Plus Cost of Repairs and Escrow Plumbing and Gas Fitting See Attached Plumbing Permit Fee Schedule Process Piping See Attached Mechanical Permit Fee Schedule Sign Permit 2.50 per square foot Wind Energy, Radio and Based on Value - See Television Tower Permit Attached Building Permit Fee Sa..a *t t. Plan Check (Valuation 65% of Building Permit Fee over $10, 000) Foundation Permit Based on Value - See Attached Building Permit Fee Schedule Replacement Building Permit Field Card 5.00 Lot Transfer Fee (Bldg. Permit) 50.00 Processing Fee on Cancelled Permits One half of Plan Review Fee Duplicate Certificate of Occupancy 5.00 Reinspection Fee 30.00 A aive.ss CtiA.,•t< I q�4t,, 1,..:11:Na 8 410. Qers,,,A ISS11td.) 5o•o0 New 1992 l q a3 PEE TYPE PEE (rogwa Reprocess Fee (End of the Month Permits) 20.00 L\v ^1 ,tS Underground Storage Tank im L � Installation/Removal See Attached Mechanical Permit Fee Schedule State of Minnesota Contractor License Verification 5.00 . 9 / \C OS PERMITS `~�� CITY OF EAGAN °�� PROPOSED 1992 PERMIT FEES tick PERMIT FEES - Fees based on UBC Fee Schedule 65% Plan Review Charge on all permits over $10,000. Permits are issued to specific lots - any lot change after issuance of permit $50.00 transfer fee. Utility Charges - collected with permit fee (Applies to Single Family Dwelling Permits - Verify All Others) Sewer Availability Charge (SAC) - $800.00 #450 Water Availability Charge (WAC) - $675.00 # i„.45 Water Meter (5/8") - $ 95.00 f CDs Road Unit Charge - $380.00 # 3110 Treatment Plant Charge - $300.00 # J24 $1.00 - $500.00 -- $15.00 $501.00 - $2, 000.00 -- $15.00 for the first $500.00 plus $2.00 for each additional $100.00 or fraction thereof, to and including $2,000.00. $2,001.00 - $25,000.00 -- $45.00 for the first $2,000.00 plus $9.00 for each additional $1,000.00 or fraction thereof, to and including $25,000.00. $25,001.00 - $50,000.00 -- $252.00 for the first $25,000.00 plus • 6.50 for each additional $1,000.00 or fraction thereof, to and including $50,000.00. $50,001.00 - $100,000.00 -- $414.50 for the first $50,000.00 plus $4.50 for each additional $1,000.00 or fraction thereof to and including $100,000.00. $100,001.00-$500,000.00 -- $639.50 for the first $100,000.00 plus $3.50 for each additional $1,000.00 or fraction thereof. $500, 001.00 - $1,000,000 -- $2,039.50 for the first $500,000.00 plus $3.00 for each additional $1,000.00 or fraction thereof, to and including $1,000,000.00. $1,000,001.00 and Up -- $3,539.50 for the first $1,000,000.00 plus $2.00 for each additional $1,000.00 or fraction thereof. All permit fees are rounded to the nearest dollar amount. 10 //,-C 7EEB FOR APARTMENT BUILDINGS (ONE COMMON \0 ' 1 ENTRANCE i ONE LAUNDRY FACILITY) Q r c 6 Sewer Availability Charge (SAC)-80% of $800 x number of units 4%60 Water Availability Charge (WAC)-80% of $675 x number of units #'L4S Road Unit -80% of $380 x number of units 4 390 Treatment Plant Charge -80% of $300 x number of units 4 394 Accessory buildings in apartment complexes will not pay MWCC SAC (Per MWCC policy) . City SAC, WAC, Road Unit and Water Treatment will be charged at 80% of full value. STATE BURCEARGE ON ALL PERMITS Value Based Permits Valuation of Structure Surcharge Addition or Alteration Computation $1,000,000 or Less .0005 x Valuation $1,000,001 to $2,000,000 $ 500 + .0004 x (Value - $1,000,000) $2,000,001 to $3,000,000 $ 900 + .0003 x (Value - $2,000,000) $3,000,001 to $4,000,000 $1,200 + .0002 x (Value - $3,000,000) $4, 000,001 to $5,000,000 $1,400 + .0001 x (Value - $4,000,000) $5,000,001 and Up $1,500 + .00005 x (Value - $5,000,000) gixed Fee Permits ¢.-59- per-41,0949-1--or €maetion #hereof,--of perm. fee--(not-aentraat Q,i o 1,k olt �t�•••:� F{� ..�•av�y o w.tu c a ;04 it 1,000 or Less 4 . co I ,Oot ay.' Ove•r F u e X . ODDS 11 //6 PLUMBING PERMIT FEES - 1992 vqa3 s`d q iC `O * RESIDENTIAL (1 $ 2 FAMILY DWELLINGS. TOWNHOMES. CONDOMINIUMS) Minimum Fee $15.00 104)Add-on, modification or alteration 15.00 Plumbing fixture 3.00 each 6%611\ Water softener 5.00 Water heater 3.00 Fuel/gas piping system 3.00 per outlet Fixture rough-in 1.50 each Lawn sprinkler system 3.00 each Private sewage disposal system 15.00 * COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL/APARTMENT BUILDINGS 1% of contract price with a minimum fee of $25 * Verify with Inspections Department which classification of multiple residential dwellings your building fits in and what type of permit is required. MECHANICAL PERMIT FEES - 1992 * RESIDENTIAL (1 i 2 FAMILY DWELLINGS. TOWNHOMES. CONDOMINIUMS) Minimum fee $15.00 Add-on, modification, or alteration 15.00 HVAC - 1 - 100,000 BTU/H's 24.00 additional 50,000 BTU/H's (or fraction thereof) 6.00 Fuel/gas piping system 3.00 per outlet * COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL/APARTMENT BUILDING Minimum fee $25.00 HVAC 1% of contract price Process piping systems $25.00 * Verify with Inspection Department which classification of multiple residential dwellings your building fits in and what type of permit is required. 12 lid CITY OF EAGAN a ELECTRICAL INSPECTION FEES �O NOTE: MINIMIIM CHARGE FOR EACH INSPECTION - $15.00 "� ALL PERMITS REQUIRE 8.50 STATE SURCHARGE 1. Payment of fees - All electrical inspection fees are due and payable to the City of Eagan at or before commencement of the installation and shall be forwarded to the City of Eagan. 2. The fees for signs shall be computed in accordance with State_ schedule with a minimum fee of $15.00 per sign. 3. Swimming pool ground fees shall be computed separately at $40.00 per pool. 4. Minimum fee for each separate inspection of an installation, replacement, alteration or repair limited to one inspection only - $15.00. 5. Services, change of services, temporary services, additions, alterations or repairs on either primary or secondary services shall be computed separately. 1 to 100 ampere capacity $15.00 101 to and including 200 ampere capacity or fraction thereof $18.00 For each addition of 100 amperes or fraction thereof $ 5.00 6. Circuit, installations or additions, alterations or repairs of each circuit or subfeeder shall be computed separately including circuits fed from subfeeders and including the equipment service. Circuits of 250 volts or less. 0 to and including 30 ampere capacity $ 4.00 31 to and including 100 ampere capacity $ 7.00 For each additional 100 ampere capacity or fraction thereof $ 6.00 For circuits over 250 volts, double the fee for 250 volts or less. 7. In addition to the above fees: a. A charge of $2.00 will be made for each street lighting standard. b. A charge of $2.00 will be made for each traffic signal head. Circuits originating within the standard will not be used when computing the fee. 8. In addition to the above fees, all transformers and generators for lights, heat and power shall be computed separately at $2.00 per unit plus $.10 per KVA up to and including 100 KVA, 101 KVA and over at $.05 per KVA. The maximum fee for any transformer or generator in this category is $20.00. 13 //8" Iqq 3 Qropokd 1\..)o Chdom.es 9. In addition to the above fees, all transformers or signs and outline lighting shall be computed at $3.00 for the first 500 VA or fraction thereof per unit, plus $.25 for each additional 100 VA or • fraction thereof. 10. In addition to the above fees (unless included in the maximum fee filed by the initial installer) , remote controls, signal circuits, fire warning and security circuits of less than 50 volts shall be computed at $15.00 per first ten openings or devices of each system plus $1.00 for each additional opening. 11. For the review of plans and specifications of proposed installations, there shall be a minimum fee of 8100.00 up to and including $30,000 of electrical estimate, plus 1/10 of 1% on any amount in excess of $30,000 to be paid by persons or firms requesting the review. 12. When reinspection is necessary to determine whether unsafe conditions have been corrected and such conditions are not the subject of an appeal pending before the Board or any court, a reinspection fee of not to exceed the original unit fee, or $15.00, whichever is less, may be assessed in writing by the inspector. 13. For inspections not covered herein, or for requested special inspections or services, the fee shall be $25.00 per man hour, including travel time, plus $.20 per mile traveled, plus the reasonable cost of equipment of material consumed. This section is also applicable to inspection of empty conduits and such other jobs as determined by the inspector. 14. For inspections of transient project including, but not limited to, carnivals and circuses, the inspection fees shall be computed as follows: a. Power supply units - According to Item 4 (b) (2) of fee schedule - a like fee will be required on power supply units at each engagement during the season, except that a fee of $25.00 per hour will be charged for additional time spent by the inspector if the power supply is not ready for inspection at the time and date specified on the request for inspection as required by law. b. Rides, devices or concessions - Shall be inspected at their first appearance of the season and the inspection fee shall be $15.00 per unit. 15. Fees double - When any person, co-partnership or corporation begin work of any kind such as hereinbefore set forth, or for which a permit from the electrical inspector is required by ordinance, without having secured the necessary permit therefore from the inspector of buildings either previous to or during the day of the commencement of any such work, or on the next succeeding day where such work is commenced on a Saturday or on a Sunday or a holiday, he shall when subsequently securing such permit, be required to pay double the fees herein- before provided for such permit, and ' shall be subject to all penal provisions of this ordinance. 14 /I/ ‘ttQ3 f roeose d fs C Vav►rre. • 16. Additional Fees and/or Fee Shortage - Additional fees and/or fee shortages must be received by the City within 14 days of written notice. If additional fees and/or fee shortages are not received within 14 days of notice, permits for electrical installations will not be accepted by the City until such time as the additional fees and/or shortages are received. Additional fees and/or fee shortages that are not received within 14 days of notice are subject to a 10% per day penalty. 16 /cO UTILITY 7888 I q q 3 1992 fjOQb4 .L TEE TYPE PEE Trunk Utility/Connection/Availability Charge Trunk Sanitary Sewer Oversize Unplatted $1,495/Ac. 41590 Platted Residential 720/Lot 740 Trunk Water Main Oversize Unpiatted and Platted Comm. & Ind. 1,565/Ac. # 1(. 1.5 Platted Residential 750/Lot 775 Water Supply & Storage (WAC) Gs m.—&—sus,,- /e«. - :•1 2,470/Ac. 7,5 50 Trunk Storm Sewer Oversize Single Family .069/S.F. .011 Multi-Family .087/S.F. ,pgq Comm. & Ind. .104/S.F. .10117 Lateral Benefit Utility/Connection/Availability Charge Lateral Benefit from Trunk Sanitary Sewer 34.50/Centerline Foot ;CV) Lateral Benefit from Trunk Water Main Single Family 30.60/Centerline Foot 31.1.0 Multi-Family and Comm. & Ind. 50.50/Centerline Foot 5 2. 10 Lateral Benefit from Trunk Storm Sewer 12" Storm Sewer *39.10/Centerline Foot 40.30 15" Storm Sewer *40.60/Centerline Foot 41.E5 18" Storm Sewer *43.40/Centerline Foot 44.?0 21" Storm Sewer *46.60/Centerline Foot 4S—ca 24" Storm Sewer *53.50/Centerline Foot 55.10 *Rate is based on a pipe at 15 foot depth, cost for additional depth will be reviewed on a case by case basis. / 16 / Ll 1 1q3 fYo ?olred- 'Street Assessments • 1992 FEE Residential Multiple Conn./Ind. 32' wide 44' Ride 52' wide Rate/7.7. state/P.!. state/P.!. Street Surfacing $28.15 $51.20 $67.65 • Street Surfacing 34.05 34.2o 65.15 (,5.6o 89.65 qo.s S w/Grading Street Surfacing 39.90 40.'35 65.95 (AL A0 85.10 85.6.5 w/Storm Sewer Street Surfacing 45.80 St... 30 79.90 80.10 107.10 10 .25 w/Grading & Storm Sewer Trails Concrete (5' wide) $15.30/F.F. Includes $3.00/F.F. for Sod and Grading Bituminous Trail (8' wide) 12.05/F.F. Includes $3.00/F.F. for Sod and Grading Water Quality Dedication A. Based on Per Acre Land Values Single Family $16,330 k *-k4' Er, Duplex 18,630 ql f�` Townhome 21,735 Qai�' 400e$ Apartments, Schools & Churches 23,805 � Industrial 65,340 VI Commercial 130,680 ` • N • S` and eft‘ B. Excavation Rate of 62.00/cubic yard 17 la �- 1gct 3 UTILITY RATES AND FEES 11 Qr oposcd 1992 PEE TYPE PEE Sanitary Sewer 0,0'41° .0 p to Single Family, Townhouse MN $15.60/Qtr. for 10,000 and Similar Residential Ly5 Gal. $1.35/1000 Gal. for All Usage Over 10,000 Gal. Based on Winter Quarter Meter. Reading 11.•1.0 Apartment, Institutional MN $15.60/Qtr. for 10,000 Commercial & Industrial %A5 Gal. $1.35/1000 Gal. for all Usage over 10,000 Gal Sewer only (Sewer with no Flat Rate - $29.10/Qtr. # 31 . 10 water connection/meter to measure flow) Water Works 140.10 All users MN $15.50/Qtr for 10,000 Gal. & $.90/1000 Gal. for .q1 All Usage Over 10,000 Gal Storm Water Drainage $4.56/REF/Qtr. 5.00 (R3 Zoning 20% Credit) Water Account Deposit $15.00/Residential Account Sewer Account Deposit $15.00/Residential Account Dtreet Lights/Signal Lights peighborhood Single Family/Twin Homes (R-1, R-2) $2.95 Per Qtr Per Lot 3. %S Townhouses (R-3) $2.35 Per Qtr Per Unit a.SO Multiple Residential it $31.35/Qtr./Billing Acct. 33 'j o C/I non-continuous $3.65/Qtr./Ac. C/I continuous .136/L.F./Qtr. 3'90 18.90/Ac./Qtr. . 145 Individual Lights 70. 15 100 WHPS $19.55/Light/Qtr. 14 . 15 150 WHPS 29.55/Light/Qtr. 30.45 250 WHPS 40.00/Light/Qtr. 42.35 Community and Signal Lights Rl/R2 $1.70/Unit/Qtr. R3 $1.35/Unit/Qtr. R4 $1.20/Unit/Qtr. Non-Residential $5.10/Unit/Qtr. 18 /023 igg3 Q.oQoxl 1992 FEE TYPE PEE Road Unit Charge Residential Except Apartments $380/unit (1.0 RUC) 3 qp Apartments (80%) 304/unit (0.8 RUC) 31 Non-Residential 1,140/acre (3.0 RUC) x40 1110 Sewer Availability Charge (SAC) Single Family (R1 and R2) $800 j # 851) Other 41- 850/ SAC LI..;k Treatment Plant Charge 300 2 7y Water Supply & Storage (WAC) Single Family 675/Lot LAS Apartments 540/Unit SSS Non-Residential 2,470/Ac. 2,55o Shut-off Charge 25.00 30.00 Delivery of Shut-off Notice 10.00 Late Fee 10% of Balance Sewer Permit Le_tatt irk Ex`'+'~isl $15.00 stoc Water Permit ON e.A.A. awd 9.4-tat E ∎`}` "`'6l 15.00 5O.00 Temporary Construction Meter Permit 10.00 ($200 Escrow Dep. ) (6 month maximum) (City retains $30 as administrative fee) Scheduled After Hours A. Call Out - Labor Rate 2.5 Hr. Work Minimum + 10% Administrative ($50 maximum Administration) B. Extended Day Labor + 10% Admin. ($50 maximum Admin. ) Water Meter Removal 30.00 Water Meter Replacement /O. g..esedik;w44 30.00 Sewer Tap 100.00 Water Tap 100.00 1(9, ICI 43 • 1992 ef 0 f0104-1 FEE TYPE FEE Water Meters 5/8" x 3/4" meter* 95.00 105 3/4 water meter* 135.00 150 1" water meter 155.00 11.5 11/2" water meter 345.00 3/5 2" water meter 470.00 . 515 2" compound** 1,385.00 1,520 3" compound** 1,720.00 1.EAo 4" compound** 2,650.00 g,gto 6" compound** 4,555.00 9,990 2" turbo meter** 730.00 81O 3" turbo meter** 990.00 ',toO 4" turbo meter** 1,620.00 1,ggo 6" turbo meter** 3,010.00 3,310 #2 copperhorn w/swivel 16.00 Remote wire (over 35' ) 0.06/Ft Replacement (Provided the first time with meter) : Outside Remote Read Out Meter 16.00 Outside Remote "Touch Pad" Meter 12.00 Meter Strainers: 2" 185.00 200 3" 235.00 055 4" 350.00 310 6" 450.00 910 Meter Testing (Charged only if meter tests correct) : 5/8" through 1" 50.00 1 1/4" through 2" 80.00 All other sizes Contract Cost (Mpls)+ 10% Meter Box Cover 39.002. too Io..1a. Lid to Meter Box Cover 17.00 aOok:1411 t •O0ii% Deposit to turn on water before 44.4. C:Act all work is satisfactorily completed 200.00 Q�;VAe S , 4.,,. (City retains $30 as administrative fee) * Includes Copperhorn ** Includes Strainer Qr:vak c. tkz I var.i ... IMa: r ,"&rats / F1.;st.;A 30.00 Nev1 gala: r 71 :1A..e . PNWkevia% i ? I°t93 PARKS AND RECREATION o OWL 1992 PEE TYPE FEE AV Parkland Dedication � �.o u. ' ,s Single Family $700.00 k ��W 4A Duplex 621.00 VD V. Townhouse/Quad 553.00 Qo, '' Apartments/Multiple 559.00 Nrb � .z014 Commercial and Industrial .055/S.F. 0e. .d• Ldp Trailway Dedication $100/unit 854/Acre Park Fees Picnic Kit 3.00/7.00 Trapp Farm and Thomas Lake Pavilions(1) 85.00 Per Day 60.00 1/2 Day Enclosed Shelter Buildings(1) 85.00 Per Day 60.00 1/2 Day Open Shelters 25.00 Extra Picnic Tables (maximum of six) 20.00 Athletic Facilities/Shelters(1) Fields 50.00 Per Field Per Day Lights (If Required)-Tournaments 25.00 Per Field Per Hr Building Cleaning 50.00 Per Day Restrooms/Bases/Field Chalking 25.00 per reservation Maintenance Fee - Travel Baseball 60.00 Youth/Team 150.00 Adult/Team (6-9 games) 300.00 Adult/Team (10+games) Tries S«,ca.► / N401.4..1 GO AO1 Tr'wd Tea. Concession Permit (maximum of 3) 200. 0 Community Rooms Events 50.00 Profit and Fund Raising 100.00 Chuckwagon Grill 25.00 Canopy 50.00/Day (1) Requires Damage Report 150.00 21 /3.16 MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT AND PERSONNEL a q 3 1992 ` tofOaot FEE TYPE FEE Maintenance Person $20.00/hr. (Regular) 30.00/hr. (Overtime) Foreman 24.00/hr. Pick-up truck 22.00/hr. 1 Ton dump truck 23.00/hr. Single axle dump truck 30.00/hr. Tandem axle dump truck 35.00/hr. Tractor 15.00/hr. Backhoe/loader 35.00/hr. Front end loader 56.00/hr. Road grader 56.00/hr. Street sweeper 41.00/hr. Roller 20.00/hr. Paver 20.00/hr. Air Compressor 15.00/hr. 50 KW Generator 35.00/hr. Sewer Jetter 66.00/hr. Sewer Rodder 33.00/hr. Sewer Vacuum - Trailer 33.00/hr. Sewer Vacuum - Truck 70.00/hr. • Groundsmaster Mower 22.00/hr. Pump 6" 25.00/hr. Pump 8" 28.00/hr. Skid Loader 35.00/hr. Chipper 15.00/hr. CITY STAFF RATES Department Directors $80.00/hr. Assistant City Engineer 60.00/hr. City Planner 60.00/hr. , •jv Design/Development Engineer 55.00/hr. rria:a%.wa•►ee. L( . ..' Park.Planner 50.00/hr. # ,, r• 464-14.6y. Supervisor 50.00/hr. �. Senior Planner 50.00/hr. Senior Technician 45.00/hr. ).►Ac.. Q�k�1� COO•,:r►.�. Project Planner 40.00/hr. `s Technician 40.00/hr. 50.00 Aide 30.00/hr. Intern 20.00/hr. Survey Crew (I.,..,1.r4 s 04.V44.6..4 2 person .►..a Ev;tv,..4) 70.00/hr. 3 person 90.00/hr. Billing rates to the railroad for fires caused by them: Manpower $ 9.00/hr. Pumper 200.00/hr. Tanker Chief's Vehicle 150.00/hr. Rescue, Grass Rigs Command Vehicle, Aerial 500.00/hr. (Minimum 1 hour charge) 22 / a7 EXHIBIT "B" (Developer's Escrow Agreement) P relimina ry Plat Application on Escrow (1) Waiver of Platting Escrow (Initial Deposit) $150 per acre $1,500 Minimum $4,800 Maximum Final Plat Application Escrow (1) (Initial Deposit) $4,000 Contract Management Escrow (1) (Initial Deposit) Estimated Construction Costs (2) Escrow $ 0 - $150,000 8% ($1,000 Minimum) 4% $150, 001 - $500,000 6% ($12,000 Minimum) 3% $500, 001 + 5% ($30,000 Minimum) 2.5% ")These are escrow deposits with minimums/maximums, they are not intended to be actual charges. (2)Costs will be verified by City staff and adjusted as necessary to be comparable to City Projects, thereby insuring armslength transaction costs. 23 C)• g Agenda Information Memo December 1, 1992 City Council Meeting CITY CODE AMENDMENT/ALARM REGULATIONS C. Amendment, Ordinance, Section 10.43, Fire, Burglary, and Safety Alarm Regulations and Requirements--Enclosed on pages /3through /3 is a memorandum from the Finance/City Clerk's office covering the proposed amendments to City Code Section 10.43 regarding alarms. As noted, the intent of the proposed amendment is to bring the City Code into compliance with the current false alarm policy which was recently modified by the City Council. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny an ordinance amending City Code Section 10.43 regarding fire,burglary, and safety alarm regulations and requirements. 1� 9 November 24, 1992 TO:. CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES FROM: ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT WITT RE: FALSE ALARM ORDINANCE AMENDMENT A few months ago the City Council approved changes in the false alarm policy by: 1. Reducing the number of "free" false alarms to three. The user will now be fined starting with the fourth and all subsequent alarms 2. Charging a single rate of $75 for residential, commercial, industrial and institutional false alarms . The amendment changes ordinance language to agree with Council action. / 30 SEC. 10.43. FIRE, BURGLARY AND SAFETY ALARM REGULATIONS AND REQUIREMENTS. Subd. 1. Purpose. This Section regulates the use of fire, burglary and safety alarms for the purpose of preventing the public safety services from misuse of public safety alarms through frequency of false alarms. Subd. 2. Definitions. For the purpose of this Section: A. "Alarm User" means the person using an alarm system to protect his premises, regardless of whether he owns or leases the system. B. "Alarm System" means and includes any alarm installation designed to be used for the prevention or detection of burglary, robbery, or fire on the premises which contain an alarm installation. Automobile alarm devices shall not be considered an alarm system. 250 (4-30-84) 13 / § 10 .43 C. "False Alarm" means the occurrence of an alarm in an alarm system for any reason other than an ,un-authorized intrusion or attempted robbery, or call to an existing fire. D. "Financial Institution" means a commercial bank, savings and loan association, credit union or establishment leasing safe deposit boxes. E. "Audible Alarm" means a device designed for the detection of smoke or fire or of an unauthorized entry on the premises, which alarm activates or generates an audible sound on or near the premises. F. "Calendar Year" means the period January 1 through December 31 of each year. rm.___IResideat-L11.-Alaza-41-sixe—means—orAwip-i4N1 -lrottsins-traits,--re iderrtrai-names-and-condom-i ritrms. indttgtriai,--baslness;-State- ,--special--purpose-units e€-Tavel.rrment;-apartment-comp egmm: Subd. 3. Regulations and Requirements. h:---Alarar--User-Reg-ist et4eft--- c-l-1ew-irtg-t ie frrst-false-aiaYm--pri thrn--any-eat.entla-r- `,--the--aiam--ase-r shall--f-rrr-ovt-arrci-refitmr-to--t-he--Po��t�-Bepn�t�r�t-tie "old,.ni---user-Registrations--form-as-provided-iv-it ri-rt--3-0--vials: R:---�afse-�-tarm--3-tateme'rrt--of--C'orreet��rrr. Fattowtng-,tha--sixlh-false-aldL nr-w-ittrim--the-calendar-- rear-, the- almns-usmr-shall--ti-11-uirl -and-reK-rrrr-to-tire--Police Degartment-wlttlm five--days- -"?a-]se--*ldL nr--Statement--o{ Carrecttorts".---Thts-form- shall uuiildi T-a-detailed-statement 6f-tome"Cor t tve-antivrrs-tire--alarm-aser--h-as--taten--to prevent-addtttonat-faise-alarms;- and -tcrTnrrt-ifyalar-m-- se-r-of tmpntlfng-farfeftures-st trill- ddJ itiuna1--fai-se- a-aL i rs -occur. A-6. Audible Alarms. All audible alarms shall meet the following requirements: 1. Every person maintaining an alarm system with an audible alarm signal shall post a notice containing the name and telephone number of a person to be notified to render repairs or service to such alarm system during any hour of the day or night upon activation of such alarm system. Such notice shall be posted at the main entrance to such premises or near the alarm in such a position as to be legible frcm the ground level adjacent to the building. 250-1 (4-30-84) /3a2- § 10 .43 2. Alarm systems with audible alarm signals, except for fire alarms, shall have an automatic shut-off which will silence the audible alarm signal within a period not to exceed 20 minutes. B.B. In-House Annunciation Panel. Financial institutions having an alarm system with multiple sensors shall have an in-house annunciation panel providing specific annuncia-tion of the sensors at a private monitoring location on the premises. When, in the judgment of the Police Department, no such private monitoring location is possible upon the premises, the requirements of this Subparagraph -LLB may be waived. C. -in.p1}an€.e--w.1-t-h---t414 Su4par.ag aph-D-€s-gege4.red-a€-a44-a4a-r-m-4;yst ins-te444 1-i-n tlna��4 -lr-tnst44 t o*s-at-t-e-r--the--a-f-f-ee-dive-da-t-e--a€-4A14-s- Sect4 ,--iNut-w4t i-rn--e-yea-r--f-rLcmil-a€f e-c-t i��e-date-e-f-444-s- Sec-tian.-fos-cssently-egefat4ag-a la a�ryat-ems. cL. No person shall install an alarm system or use, monitor, and possess an operative alarm system which utilizes taped or prerecorded messages which deliver a telephone alarm message to the Police or Fire Departments. , No automatic dialing services or systems are permitted in any form, including automatic dialing of the emergency number 911. DF. Unlawful Act. It is unlawful for any person to fail or refuse to comply with the regulations set forth in this Subdivision. Subd. 4. Schedule of Payment Rates. A. Resident4a1 users of alarm systems shall three (3) be permitted 4;1x-46-) false alarms per calendar year and pay $-5-.-0-0- r--f-apse-alaTal--t nea-f a fine as established by resolution for each false alarm thereafter. B:--Aloe-r�-si_dept4-a-L4-sess -sys-teAlls walk-tie-- a-r-m.i tied-a i-ic--(6-)--fa-Ise.-a la ns--pew-oa-Le-n.i.ar-. aar- af&-pay-$g5:9-g-peE-€a4se-a A4411-4-11-r-tea-IMta;-. E:--TheEe-4s-#er-eby--e-6tab-14shed--a-a naty-49.4)- c y-geaee-pef4ed -i.nstalled-alagat-.sy-s#.e4ns.4--a.l..l €alse--a-larm-s- eeee-E3411--de-r341411--t413-e_-pe-r4.041--sha41-not- eeftsi-deed-peft--rf--tl -si-*-allewab4e-440 a-Lax-ms-per--year give-4111K-e-14at4en-ate-m-u-6t-e-ve.r3-fwd-by--a--dated r-eeei pt-€ef--tom-alaE-m-Sys-tre-Wr-9 -a--da-tad-invoice--f-Eam--tom €fs allee-a€-the-a4aff� t-ems BB- A false alarm is excused if prior written notification stating the exact time is given to the Police Department, and the alarm is activated for the purposes of, testing or upgrading the alarm system. 250-2 (4-30-84) 33 S 10 .43 --Pr 11--@a ►�a�ak�-_px��LdQSL_ffl�_ h i s 5a-bd. i-en-sha44- -te- 4e-30- 44,-te-r ma€1t act-a--s t-ein n#-€e--the--a-1-arm+-tn3e-r:-- -we€--ache w1b -d-a-y-4-awe-da-14-rrq-ue•et-aril-a- -a€-18$-o-f--tire am et -t-4t a--x+-11€--ire--adde-d. A4-1-4e 14 }b-tire-r-g-es--ettd pema-14les-sha 11-h e-ee r t 4€4 ed-tty-t#te-£-lt--£-1-e-r4--tor-the-43-elatt-y' A-e44Corr---whe---h-n-1-1--p a -e-rte-ea---a-esea aAmetrt--rai-l--e-aca--p er prow141-eg-4•e - - -de-1-1-ngttenb-amocmta---aga-i-n t- the-pteperty-e€-the-del4aelaetrt-tti-etrilt-�tsorr _ C. All billings provided for in this Subdivi- sion are delinquent 30 days after mailing a statement to the alarm users . Delinquent payments are subject to a 10% penalty of the amount due. All delinquent charges and penalties shall be certified by the City Clerk to the County Auditor who shall prepare an assessment roll each year providing for assessment of the delinquent amounts against the property of the delin- quent alarm user. D.R. Confidentiality. All information submitted in compliance with this Section shall be held in confidence and shall be deemed a confidential record exempt from discovery to the extent permitted by law. Subject to requirement of confidentiality, the Chief of Police may develop and maintain statistics for the purpose of ongoing alarm systems evaluation. Source: Ordinance No. 16 , 2nd Series Effective Date: 4-27-84 (Sections 10.44 through 10.49, inclusive, reserved for future expansion. ) 250-3 (4-30-84) /3 `4 Agenda Information Memo December 7, 1992 City Council Meeting ON-SALE LIQUOR LICENSE/HOLIDAY INN D. License, On-Sale Liquor, Holiday Inn (Doubletree Hotel), 2700 Pilot Knob Road--An application has been received of the new owners of the Holiday Inn, formerly the Doubletree Hotel, located at 2700 Pilot Knob Road. The Police Department is in the process of completing its investigation relative to this application. A copy of the application together with the Police Department's report in this regard will be distributed with Additional Information next week. At that time, it will be known whether or not the department has identified any reason for denial of this application. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny an on-sale liquor license for the Holiday Inn, formerly the Doubletree Hotel, located at 2700 Pilot Knob Road as presented. 13S Agenda Information Memo December 1, 1992 City Council Meeting SPECIAL PERMIT/FAITH CHURCH OF GLORY/SIBLEY INDUSTRIAL PARK E. Special Permit,Faith Church of Glory,to Allow Church Services to be Held in an Office Warehouse at 3584 Kennebec Drive and Zoned LI (Light Industrial), Located in the Northwest Quarter of Section 17--Enclosed on pages /V through/3?is the Community Development Department staff report relative to the above-referenced special use permit. As noted in the staff memorandum, the location being considered for this permit was previously occupied by the Harvest Fellowship Church which moved from the space in July of this year. Faith Church of Glory has requested a similar permit for this space for a period of two years. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny a special use permit for Faith Church of Glory to allow church services to be held in an office warehouse at 3584 Kennebec Drive as presented. /3' SUBJECT: SPECIAL USE PERMIT APPLICANT: FAITH CHURCH OF GLORY LOCATION: NW QUARTER SECTION 17 CEDAR INDUSTRIAL PARK RLS PART OF TRACT F EXISTING ZONING: LIGHT INDUSTRIAL (L-I) DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: DECEMBER 1, 1992 DATE OF REPORT: NOVEMBER 24, 1992 COMPILED BY: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT APPLICATION SUMMARY: An application has been submitted requesting a two-year Special Use Permit to allow Faith Church of Glory to meet in a Light Industrial building located at 3584 Kennebec Drive. BACKGROUND: Harvest Fellowship (originally Eagan Christian Center) was initially granted a two-year Special Use Permit to hold church services at this location in 1986. Subsequent two-year renewals were granted by the City Council in 1988, 1990, and most recently, July 1992. Harvest Fellowship has since moved. Faith Church of Glory has held services since January 1987: three years at Metcalf Jr. High School and the past two years in an office/warehouse space in Mendota Heights. COMMENTS: According to the applicant, due to steady growth of the congregation, a larger space became necessary and while planning for expansion of their current location, the church became aware of Harvest Fellowship vacating its Eagan location. After inspecting the facility, it was determined that this site would meet their needs and be far more cost effective than expanding the Mendota Heights facility. The Faith Church of Glory pastor says services and activities will be limited to evenings and weekends. If approved, this Special Use Permit shall be subject to: 1. This temporary permit shall expire two years from the date of City Council approval. 2. Church functions shall be limited to evenings and weekends. 3. All applicable City Code requirements. /3? —v' -1 v/ ,; Q 4 . I I '/ w ; SW P° E SW /t SE / ;i---"' \J w J Pp'. 1\` C 1 1/ / 113 `r... - o: (17 Isis (R�c �iw •� ; \CrouTinny I; q0 �� of /,, ,\ wTl,41dJ SE �� "SW I \� E �)w . ---A O I FO �4 •/ ,,cam_ J //// iutfl LL 'I 1 Kt �, is �� N V.V.' -�1 7- cN u g .. / ��. = s a NE I / �//�a it sr 'A LAI) T' a AN•• / •nom,� —rte yL4 Ikatil � $YiIELL lVt ` FAITH CHURCH OF GLORY KENI3i.-3E:- DRIVE SAAWAJEE (JSAJCES CENTER. . O G 0 Ce 2 W Q c („ e" 0 W ^ LAFOt3OP45..V . McvILnN rcoed V HI....HU)A.' 13 CEpgRVALE MALL- l3g a Jr f N — li I \lino, 0 r . 'A N ----7 P J QL ± D , . Z V Z 1 Z E Q 'a 0 i ( D N L----A J w *MM' L • ! _ O S t . I r-- •t /3? Agenda Information Memo December 7, 1992 City Council Meeting COMPREHENSIVE GUIDE PLAN AMENDMENT/REZONING LEXINGTON AVENUE RTC PROPERTY F. Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment, City of Eagan, Changing the Land Use Designation from D-III (Mixed Residential, 6-12 Units/Acre) to IND (Industrial) for Approximately 62 Acres of Land and a Rezoning from R-3 (Townhouse Residential) to LI (Light Industrial) of Approximately 57 Acres of the Above 62 Acres Located on the West Side of Lexington Avenue South of the Bulk Mail Facility Generally in the N 1/2 of the SE 1/4 of Sec. 10--At its meeting of November 24, 1992, the Advisory Planning Commission considered the above referenced comprehensive guide plan amendment and rezoning initiated by the City. These applications were brought forward as a consequence of the property's unusual circumstance as a free-standing medium density housing land use surrounded on all sides by commercial/industrial uses. As the Resolution Trust Corporation is in the process of disposing of various properties including this one, it appeared appropriate to consider the land use compatibility of the area prior to receipt of any development plans. For additional information with respect to this item, please refer to the Community Development Department staff report which is enclosed on pages /4C/ through/S/for your. review. Also enclosed on pages /sthrough /J3are the Advisory Planning Commission minutes of October 22 and November 24 regarding this item. Because of an error in the legal notice for the first public hearing, the item was reheard at the November 24 meeting. The APC is recommending approval of both actions. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny 1) a comprehensive guide plan amendment for the City of Eagan changing the land use designation from D-III (mixed residential 6-12 units per acre) to Ind (Industrial) for approximately 62 acres of land and 2) a rezoning from R-3 (townhouse residential) to LI (light industrial) of approximately 57 acres of the above 62 acres located on the west side of Lexington Avenue south of the Bulk Mail Facility as presented. / 90 SUBJECT: COMPREHENSIVE GUIDE PLAN AMENDMENT & REZONING APPLICANT: CITY OF EAGAN LOCATION: N 1/2 OF THE SE 1/4 OF SECTION 10 EXISTING ZONING: R-3 TOWNHOUSE RESIDENTIAL & A AGRICULTURAL DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: OCTOBER 27, 1992 DATE OF REPORT: OCTOBER 20, 1992 COMPILED BY: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT APPLICATION SUMMARY: The City of Eagan is proposing a Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment changing the land use designation from D-III (Mixed Residential, 6 to 12 units per acre) to IND (Industrial) for approximately 62 acres of land and a Rezoning from R-3 (Townhouse Residential)to I-1 (Light Industrial)of approximately 57 acres of the previously stated 62 acres, located on the west side of Lexington Avenue south of the Bulk Mail Facility. BACKGROUND: The subject property consists of 57 acres in the Lexington Addition and five one-acre unplatted parcels adjacent to Lexington Addition. Lexington Addition is currently vacant, and designated D-III in the Comprehensive Guide Plan and zoned R-3. Four of the adjacent five one-acre parcels each contain a single-family house; the remaining parcel is vacant. Like Lexington Addition, these parcels are all designated D-III in the Comprehensive Guide Plan, but are zoned A (Agricultural). Lexington Addition was platted in 1969 for multi-family residential development. However, no development has occurred on this property. In 1988, a developer proposed a commercial/industrial development for the site. This application for a Comprehensive Guide Plan amendment and rezoning received City Council approval contingent upon certain requirements, including the execution of a Planned Development Agreement. A Planned Development Agreement was never executed for this proposal and, therefore, the plan amendment and rezoning were never finalized. In 1989, the 120+ acres to the south and west of Lexington Addition received a Comprehensive Guide Plan amendment and rezoning to CPD (Commercial Planned Development) and PD (Planned Development), respectively. This land, known as the O'Neil Property and Lance Property, had been previously designated for townhouse/multi- family residential uses. With the amendment and rezoning action on the O'Neil/Lance properties,Lexington Addition,and the adjacent five one-acre unplatted parcels became the only remaining residentially-designated property in the area. f / Due to the overall industrial/commercial character of the area, residential development under the current zoning and land use designation may be inappropriate from a land use perspective. For this reason, and because of numerous recent inquiries regarding development of Lexington Addition, the City Council directed staff to review the appropriateness of the existing Comprehensive Guide Plan land use designation and zoning of the property. Although, to staffs knowledge, there have been no recent inquiries regarding development of the adjacent five one-acre parcels, they, too, are designated for D-III use. As such, for the same land use considerations noted for Lexington Addition, ' these parcels have been included in the plan amendment proposal. However, because of the existing houses on these parcels,no rezoning from the current A designation is proposed at this time. DATA COLLECTION:In order to review the appropriateness of the existing Comprehensive Guide Plan land use designation and zoning of the subject property, information was gathered on the physical features and land uses (existing and proposed) of the site and surrounding properties. This information is tabulated on the data sheets attached to this report. Following is a description of each of the factors reviewed relative to the subject site, and the quality of each factor that influences decisions regarding appropriate land uses. Size: One goal of land use planning is to fit the scale of development with the physical characteristics of the site. One physical characteristic is size. The size of a parcel will affect the scale, type and intensity of development. For example, high intensity developments generally have larger building footprints and appurtenant facilities, such as parking lots. Hence, the higher the intensity of development, the larger the size of the site necessary in most cases. Zoning: The existing zoning designation indicates the type of development that is currently allowed. The existing zoning designation serves as an indicator of potential development type/density and compatibility with surrounding development. Comprehensive Guide Plan Land Use Designation: The existing Comprehensive Guide Plan land use designation indicates the type of use that is deemed suitable for future development or redevelopment of a site. These designations are not static; rather, they are expected to be refined over time as development occurs. To determine the land use that is most appropriate for a site, the current Comprehensive Guide Plan land use designation is necessary as an indicator of potential development type/density and compatibility with surrounding development. existing Land Use: Information on existing land use is necessary as a background for decisions on potential rezonings or Comprehensive Guide Plan land use changes. Surrounding Land Use. Zoning and Comp Guide Plan Land Use: Another basic goal of land use planning is to provide compatibility between adjacent land uses. This is important in order to protect less-intense land uses (eg. residential) from impacts associated with 2 more-intense land uses (eg. industrial), such as increased traffic, noise, loss of vegetation, potential visual disruptions, increased pavement areas, etc. Land use compatibility can be achieved by joining uses with similar characteristics, and separating uses with different characteristics. Separation of incompatible land uses can be provided through a variety of buffering techniques,including landscape buffers,architectural buffers, site orientation and transitional uses. In addition, natural barriers, such as ponds, hills and valleys, can provide suitable buffers between land uses. The levels of compatibility range from "compatible", which are uses with similar functions and characteristics, to "generally compatible", which are uses with similar functions but slightly different characteristics, to "generally incompatible", which are uses with different functions and generally different characteristics, to "incompatible", which are uses with different functions and different characteristics. The level at which land uses are compatible with each other does not solely dictate the appropriate locations for these uses. Rather, these levels serve to identify compatible arrangements of land uses, and the degree of buffering required when, because of other factors, incompatible arrangements are unavoidable. Topography and Vegetation: As noted previously, one goal of land use planning is to fit the scale of development with the physical characteristics of the site. Topography is a major physical characteristic which influences development. The size of the building footprint determines the development limitation with regard to slopes. Basically, any scale of structure is suitable to flat areas. As the topography becomes more steep, the feasible building footprint becomes smaller, and thus the feasible development scale becomes smaller. In general, the greater the intensity of development, the flatter the site necessary. This is a broad generalization, however, since the range of structure types possible under each use designation can alter the topographic suitability for specific development proposals. Also, innovative site planning can alleviate topographical constraints. In areas with steep slopes, sensitive site planning is necessary to mitigate potential environmental impacts associated with excessive grading. Another physical site characteristic is vegetation. As noted in the Comprehensive Guide Plan, a balanced vegetation cover is beneficial for clean water, erosion prevention, wildlife preservation,climatic modifiers,and scenic views. These benefits underscore the importance of maintaining sufficient vegetative cover as development occurs, through site designs which maintain as much existing vegetation as possible and/or re-forestation requirements where trees are removed during development. The scale and intensity of development affects the amount of existing vegetation which will 3 / 1713 • be removed. Generally, the greater the intensity of development, the greater the amount of vegetation which may need to be removed. Access: One of the most significant issues associated with development today is traffic. The Comprehensive Guide Plan contains a thoroughfare plan designed to accommodate not only trips generated from development within the City, but also trips generated from outside the City. This thoroughfare plan assigns functional classifications,based on development levels noted in the Comprehensive Guide Plan, to each roadway which define the characteristics and purpose of the roadway. Eagan's thoroughfare plan contains six functional classifications: local street,neighborhood collector, community collector, minor arterial, intermediate arterial and principal arterial. Local streets are intended to provide direct land access• and connect blocks within neighborhoods. Neighborhood collectors are intended to provide direct land access, and collect and distribute neighborhood trips to higher service roadways. Community collectors are intended to carry traffic along the periphery of a single neighborhood and carry this traffic for distances which may extend across the entire community. Minor arterials are intended to interconnect adjacent subregions and activity centers within subregions. Intermediate arterials are intended to serve major traffic and connect places within the region. Principal arterials are intended to serve major trips within and outside the region. Based on these descriptions, in general, the greater the development intensity, the greater the access requirements, and the greater the access requirements, the greater the roadway functional classification necessary to serve the development. Decisions regarding appropriate land uses must consider the adjacent roadway's functional classification and its ability to provide adequate access for proposed land uses. Special Conditions: Special conditions are characteristics that may be unique to the site or community, or may be secondary impacts related to other factors considered in land use planning. These characteristics are factors which can impact development in addition to the factors noted previously, and thus affect the determination of appropriate land uses. Roadways with functional classifications of minor arterials or above generally have traffic volumes with the potential for creating noise impacts. Eagan's proximity to the Minneapolis-St. Paul International Airport subjects many areas of the City to aircraft noise. The Metropolitan Council has established four aircraft noise exposure zones which represent areas of potential noise impacts. The levels of noise exposure in these four zones are classified as follows: Zone I, severe; Zone II, serious; Zone III, significant; and Zone IV, moderate. Portions of Eagan are in Zones III and IV. Guidelines for land use compatibility have been established by the Metropolitan Council for each of these zones. 4 / 99 The ponds and marshes in Eagan provide many benefits,including storm and surface water storage, wildlife habitat and aesthetics. With new regulations regarding water quality management and wetlands conservation recently enacted, land use planning needs to be particularly sensitive to environmental resources. ANALYSIS: An analysis was conducted considering each of the above factors as they relate to subject site. Each factor was weighed to determine whether the current zoning and/or Comprehensive Guide Plan land use designation is appropriate. When reviewing all of these factors, none present any major constraints to development, regardless of type, with the exception of land use compatibility. The existing residential designation/zoning would be considered incompatible with the surrounding use designations because residential uses have different functions and different characteristics than industrial and most commercial uses. Should the subject site develop under its existing residential designation, extensive buffering would be necessary to provide an acceptable transition between the site and surrounding land uses. Regardless of buffering, the subject site, if developed under the existing designation, would become somewhat of an"island" of residential uses wholly surrounded by industrial and commercial development. For the most part, industrial and commercial planned development uses, as designated for the surrounding land, are only compatible with other industrial and commercial uses. As such, a change in the Comprehensive Guide Plan land use designation and zoning for the subject site to industrial would create a compatible land use relationship with the surrounding property. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: To recommend approval or denial of a Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment changing the land use designation from D-III (Mixed Residential, 6 to 12 units per acre) to IND (Industrial) for approximately 62 acres of land and a Rezoning from R-3 (Townhouse Residential) to I-1 (Light Industrial)of approximately 57 acres of the previously stated 62 acres, located on the west side of Lexington Avenue south of the Bulk Mail Facility. 5 / //5 _ _ __. g 1_ i A L , ..to . ) , ,,,,,,- ' STREET MAP 1;X l-q =') g4,... s. t. LA o oik i il ,., , @ ro GEMINI 1 —Ito- IS .. RD -ji . U" E PARX sil ypE131.-22.11 ..' /II , 0 , . SW 31::NomArrr:vrTp:. 11/0.', E I / 4.FOREST RIDGE TB'. 1 Lpy I/1/cl IRONWOOD IN '. .0- DWOOD PT T ■ YAW ^ DOODLE kW ■ ----- — I 1 ( CO 121-77771 :---- T- r a --., 1.2Eff_ .4 A ; 01.EARy p.,,,, li. 1.1.1F, I F'l lit!,1110 jeut ZONING MAP . ,ip,, . / ,, At, .....-v4.—_,... , ,.4, / ,...-..;,.. -,a,f-..L =•....... 141%-itfP// 411Vt*1 .111111110 .--., - - ...,e; i.._ 1-6,-.---:-. 41 --_-,Apo-. . anN/f ,.-,.-_::' .- --..-1,. .'.: _-.::: tutNikt : ir /'i lrfr!- rw■rei '' Wk,'.7..,..' 0:ekteithk 1717■2 . ",- ''; I l• o/KJ •,, ', • /i • • ' rallY . , ‘,', 4.,"; _, i":4,-7--1,r- A-0 :-. .4'•*i -or_.;;-.*:.:',;--,i',..;- '",- _ -9 ,i,,pm.1•..z .7 •,4 r?..'.',1-, :',.2tt. '-'f; ''''. . .0•4 :^, .., s•', I ....t: ... 71'. V.- ' - - ,r- ,--.-c1/44, • - A ,„ l't :.:,: "": ' _., -. --- • . --- -R 7- • ,_ -;-;-_-_ -.77--•:::::;7--- -7-- i, .4). •„i-ii•- i:: t •_,-- . // , . , .74-1-....„,,,,:-.7 .t: -:,,,,- ; -.• 1 4-1•ii.V 4;;,!‘ ,--•:--:( --'2.:*:. ---., - _:- ,/ f.--,,..,... •- -• - • i DiT. ., .. . IN, r"-• ;;;;•;::!: ,- •ii.. .;-:-.",,,-_-1:,4.,..‘,„, COMP GUIDE PLAN MAP , .. .' F/ / 1"/ . 6 ,,,?/, ma -,.. _......._ ..< n ... . ......,...,:, sizi --•-•••••••----46.. . ,...- ---•' D—IV Tri crik r--- I C.�. A. �.� i/t�t// _� r l( -1 v J J U L I II LONE iii 114 mi Isin��;K v. ,. - ..i! 'al 7 iiii\vi _ __ _ , � : l Ea1a _� vitt. ii iii inn alom 11111iv r _____7 ••• ,,-,A,..„.,% -.i) �+ raj i�. :, -, w U.S. POSTAL•!. :��;!�!� �1i) 4) SERVICE - - 417 440 . ..601*.eithix. 41/4.?" impiontitgimM 0 4 II ti /.1) FektilakarkW: Ol DDITION di% t It AA&111 ii:- 4 Dv ei ADO a DOODLE ROAD IiCO. RD. ' 28 � ,-- I O'NEI 'S Q PONq TO RMI j O'LEA� P. RK A' DITI11_ �� ��,,,. w- CARRIAGE /� • �'i�1 HILLS �'��'� GOLF I PLOT KNOB j � COUR S E A 1 -N. il LEXINGTON ADDITION/RTC PROPERTY N LAND USE STUDY 14717 LEXINGTON ADDITION/RTC PROPERTY LAND USE STUDY GENERAL LOCATION: On the west side of Lexington Avenue, south of the Bulk Mail facility, in the SE 1/4 of Section 10 SIZE: 62 acres Lexington Addition is approximately 57 acres in size. The five adjacent Ag-zoned parcels are each approximately one acre in size, for a total of five acres. The large size of Lexington Addition should pose no constraints to development, regardless of land use type. Likewise, the one acre size of each of the unplatted parcels is sufficient to allow the flexibility to develop each of these lots individually or in combination with other adjacent parcels. ZONING: R-3 Townhouse Residential (51 acres) and A Agricultural (5 acres) COMPREHENSIVE PLAN LAND USE DESIGNATION: D-III Mixed Residential (6 to 12 units per acre) EXISTING LAND USE: vacant and single-family residential The 57 acres in Lexington Addition are vacant, as is one of the five adjacent Ag-zoned parcels. The remaining four adjacent Ag-zoned parcels each have one single-family dwelling unit. SURROUNDING LAND USE, ZONING, AND COMP PLAN LAND USE DESIGNATION: North - bulk mail facility and vacant; zoned I-1; designated IND - PAGE 1 - / 4/U LEXINGTON ADDITION/RTC PROPERTY LAND USE STUDY South - vacant and 1 single-family dwelling unit; zoned PD; designated CPD East - warehouse industrial, vacant, and 1 single-family dwelling unit; zoned I-1; designated IND West - vacant and I-35E; zoned PD; designated CPD The subject site is entirely surrounded by land with existing or proposed industrial and commercial uses. As such, an industrial or commercial designation for the subject site would be most compatible with surrounding properties. TOPOGRAPHY: The terrain consists of rolling hills throughout the site, with the western side somewhat less rolling than the east. Several low-lying areas with ponds are located on the site, the largest two being in the south and southeast of the property. Regardless of land use type, grading to varying degrees will be necessary in order to develop this site. Careful site planning, including locating larger building pads on the west, less- rolling, side of the site and smaller building pads on the east side may help minimize excessive grading. VEGETATION: The south and southeast area of the site is significantly wooded, with stands of mixed hardwood. The western portion of the site is predominantly open grassland. - PAGE 2 - /171 LEXINGTON ADDITION/RTC PROPERTY LAND USE STUDY • Dense aquatic vegetation is located in and around the ponds. As with the topography of the site, development of the site with any type of land use will likely require removal of some of the existing vegetation. However, with careful site planning, groupings of the most desirable vegetation can be saved. Also, landscaping requirements of any proposed development may mitigate the loss of existing vegetation. ACCESS: Existing access to the site would be from Lexington Avenue, a minor arterial. Future access may be available from an extension of Hampton Drive/Yankee Place, a community collector, as proposed in the City's Thoroughfare Plan. With the original Lexington Addition plat, right-of-way was dedicated for Airlawn Lane and Danbury Avenue to serve the site. These roads have not been constructed. The subject site has adequate access to serve all types of development. Direct land access to Lexington Avenue would be restricted. However, direct access can be provided by the proposed extension of Hampton Drive/Yankee Place and additional future roads internal to the site. SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS: WETLANDS: Two of the ponds located on the site are listed in the Department of Natural Resource wetland inventory. These ponds are not classified as DNR-protected wetlands. However, the Wetlands Conservation Act would apply to these ponds. - PAGE 3 - So LEXINGTON ADDITION/RTC PROPERTY LAND USE STUDY NOISE: The property may receive noticeable traffic noise from both Lexington Avenue and I- 35E. Although not within an established aircraft noise zone contour for the Minneapolis-St. Paul International Airport, the property is immediately south of the contour line. As such, the property Y ma Y be impacted by aircraft noise. - PAGE 4 - /S/ Page 17/EAGAN ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES OCTOBER 27, 1992 COMPREHENSIVE GUIDE PLAN AMENDMENT, REZONING CITY OF EAGAN Chairman Voracek opened the last public hearing of the evening regarding a Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment changing the land use designation from D-III (Mixed Residential, 6-12 units/acre) to IND (Industrial) for approximately 62 acres of land and a Rezoning from R-3 (Townhouse Residential) to I-1 (Light Industrial) of approximately 57 acres of the above 62 acres located on the west side of Lexington Avenue south of the Bulk Mail Facility generally in the N 1/2 of the SE 1/4 of Section 10. City Planner Sturm stated that this piece of land was platted in 1969, however, no development ever occurred. City staff received some inquiries on this property regarding whether single-family or multi-family housing would be constructed on this site. Subsequently, the City Council ordered that a study be done on this piece of property. Letters were sent to all property owners within 350 feet of this site and no major concerns were received by City staff. Graves moved, Griggs seconded, the motion to approve a Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment changing the land use designation from D-III (Mixed Residential, 6-12 units/acre) to IND (Industrial) for approximately 62 acres of land located on the west side of Lexington Avenue south of the Bulk Mail Facility generally in the N ' 1/2 of the SE 1/4 of Section 10. All present voted in favor. Graves moved, Griggs seconded, the motion to approve a Rezoning from R-3 (Townhouse Residential) to I-1 (Light Industrial) of approximately 57 acres of the above 62 acres located on the west side of Lexington Avenue south of the Bulk Mail Facility generally in the N 1/2 of the SE 1/4 of Section 10. ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES ra/EMBER 24, 1992 CoMPBEREWBXYE GUIDE PLflI AMINDMINT, RAMMING CITY OF EAGAN Chairman Voracek opened the first public hearing of the evening regarding a Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment changing the land use designation from D-III (Mixed Residential, 6-12 units/acre) to IND (Industrial) for approximately 62 acres of land and a Rezoning from R-3 (Townhouse Residential) to I-i (Light Industrial) of approximately 57 acres of the above 62 acres located on the west side of Lexington Avenue south of the Bulk Mail Facility generally in the N 1/2 of the SE 1/4 of Section 10. City Planner Sturm stated that this application was reviewed and approved last month by the Advisory Planning Commission. However, because of an error in the legal notice, this matter must be reheard. Gorman moved, Hunter seconded, the notion to approve a Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment changing the land use designation from D-III (Mixed Residential, 6-12 units/acre) to IND (Industrial) for approximately 62 acres of land located on the west side of Lexington Avenue south of the Bulk Mail Facility generally in the N 1/2 of the SE 1/4 of Section 10. All present voted in favor. Gorman moved, Hunter seconded, the motion to approve a Rezoning from R-3 (Townhouses Residential) to I-1 (Light Industrial) of approximately 57 acres of the above 62 acres located on the west side of Lexington Avenue south of the Bulk Mail Facility generally in the N 1/2 of the SE 1/4 of Section 10. All present voted in favor. /S3 Agenda Information Memo December 1, 1992 City Council Meeting CITY CODE AMENDMENT/BOULEVARD & TRAIL REGULATIONS G. Amendment, Ordinance, to Chapters 11 and 13 of the City Code Regarding Boulevard and Trail Regulations--At its meeting of November 24, 1992, the Advisory Planning Commission held a public hearing to consider amendments to City Code Chapters 11 and 13 regarding boulevard and trail regulations. Enclosed on pages/.S.Sthrough/6 7 is a memorandum from the Parks & Recreation Department covering the results of work by a special committee to examine construction and other impacts on boulevard and trail areas within the City of Eagan. As outlined in the memorandum, several proposed ordinance changes were identified to better control these activities and ensure the protection of the City's boulevard and trail improvements. Also enclosed on page /6 is a copy of the Advisory Planning Commission minutes relative to this item. The APC is responsible for holding public hearings to review amendments of Chapters 11 and 13 of the City Code. The APC is recommending approval of these changes. Please note, however, that further amendments are also being recommended on City Code Sections 1, 7 and 9. The APC does not take action on these other code sections. They are in order for review by the City Council. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny ordinance amendments to City Code Chapters 1, 7, 9, 11 and 13 regarding boulevard and trail regulations as presented. /-5Y MEMO TO: TOM HEDGES, CITY ADMINISTRATOR KEN VRAA, DIRECTOR OF PARKS AND RECREATION FROM: JOHN K. VONDELINDE, SUPERINTENDENT OF PARKS DATE: OCTOBER 15, 1992 SUBJECT: PROPOSED REGULATIONS-RECOMMENDATIONS OF BOULEVARD/TRAILS IMPACT COMMITTEE As you know, a special committee was formed several months ago to examine the impacts of construction and other activities on the City's boulevard/trail areas, and to propose strategies and regulations for effectively dealing with these problems. The work of that committee has essentially concluded,and a number of recommendations have been reviewed and approved by the management team and Department heads. In summary, the committee is recommending a series of changes to the City ordinance, the introduction of a new annual permit for utility maintenance vehicles operating within the boulevard areas, and certain modifications and additions to the City's Permit To Work Within Right-of-Way Areas. The following is a brief synopsis of these changes and additions: 1) Proposed Ordinance Changes The following ordinance changes are being proposed: • A definition of boulevard/street right-of-way • New provisions regulating the operation of public maintenance vehicles, construction vehicles, and City vehicles within boulevard areas • Establishment of performance standards for vehicle operation on boulevards • New requirements for clean-up of motor vehicles leaving construction sites; and clean up of any material deposited within street right-of-way • New provision for charging out street and trail clean-up costs associated with construction activities • • Stronger requirements for erosion control measures adjacent to street right-of- way and trails within new developments 1 • 2) Public Utility Maintenance Vehicle Permit This would be a new permit issued to the public utility companies on an annual basis. The permit would basically allow the utilities to operate maintenance vehicles within public right-of-way areas, in accordance with the City's written regulations. This permit would not apply to construction activities within right-of-way areas which are currently covered under the existing right-of-way permit process. Some of the maintenance vehicle permit regulations would include: • Limitations of axle weight to 3,000 pounds • Use of warning flashers at all times • Speed limitations • Provisions for undisturbed pedestrian circulation • Erection of barricades and warning cones • Requirements for restoration of sod and trailway surfaces resulting from right-of- way use 3) Right-of-Way Construction Permit The right-of-way permit is an already existing document which is primarily used in those cases where utility companies are either installing or re-constructing public utilities. In its old form, the permit regulations primarily addressed safety, operational, and restoration requirements within the paved street portion of the right- of-way. Following committee review, the following additions are being suggested for the right-of-way permit: • New language adding right-of-way and boulevard areas to the permit, in general • Specific driving limitations within boulevard areas (similar to the annual maintenance permit) • Requirements for restoration of sod and trail surfaces damaged during construction • New provisions for barricading trails during construction 2 /56 This concludes most of the recommended changes and additions to the City's regulatory instruments affecting right-of-way/boulevard areas. Pursuant to our discussions, it would be appropriate to consider the forwarding of these documents to the City Council for their review and comment. JKV/sb Attachments 30wp.hedges.289 3 ORDINANCE NO. 2ND SERIES AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EAGAN, MINNESOTA, AMENDING EAGAN CITY CODE CHAPTER ELEVEN ENTITLED "LAND USE REGULATIONS" BY AMENDING SECTION 11.10, SUBD.8 REGARDING INSTALLATION OF PUBLIC UTILITY SERVICES; AND BY ADOPTING BY REFERENCE EAGAN CITY CODE CHAPTER 1 AND SECTION 11.99. The City Council of the City of Eagan does ordain: Section 1. Eagan City Code Chapter Eleven is hereby amended by changing 11.10, Subd. 8 to read as follows: Subd. 8. Public Utility Service. It is unlawful to install, construct, erect, alter, revise, reconstruct or move any pipeline, underground telephone line, underground electric transmission line, and overhead electric transmission line including structures related thereto or any other public utility device or related structure, without first obtaining the approval a written permit from the Ceuncil City. In issuing said permit, the Ceuneil City shall find that: A. The proposed location of the essential service shall not unreasonably interfere with future land use of the City. B. The depth of any buried essential services shall be at a depth that will not cause future problems with roads, streets, utilities or buildings. C. The width of any linear easements or rights-of-way shall not be such that it will unreasonably interfere with future land use. All persons obtaining a written permit pursuant to this Subdivision shall be sub-iect to those standards and regulations set forth in and as a condition of the permit issued pursuant to this Subdivision. Section 2. Eagan City Code Chapter 1 entitled "General Provisions and Definitions Applicable to the Entire City Code Including 'Penalty for Violation'" Section 11.99, entitled "Violation a Misdemeanor, " are hereby adopted in their entirety by reference as though repeated verbatim. /LC8r Section 3 . Effective Date. This ordinance shall take effect upon its adoption and publication according to law. ATTEST: CITY OF EAGAN City Council By: E. J. VanOverbeke By: Thomas A. Egan Its: Clerk Its: Mayor Date Ordinance Adopted: Date Ordinance Published in the Legal Newspaper: Date of Advisory Planning Commission Hearing: • /5 ? ORDINANCE NO. 2ND SERIES AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EAGAN, MINNESOTA, AMENDING EAGAN CITY CODE CHAPTER THIRTEEN ENTITLED "SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS" BY AMENDING SECTION 13.30, SUBD. 2 (C) (3) (e) REGARDING SPECIAL MEASURES TO PREVENT EROSION AND SILITATION ONTO STREET RIGHT-OF-WAYS; AND BY AMENDING SECTION 13.30 SUBD. 13 REGARDING ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION; AND BY ADOPTING BY REFERENCE EAGAN CITY CODE CHAPTER 1 AND SECTION 13.99. The City Council of the City of Eagan does ordain: Section 1. Eagan City Code Chapter Thirteen is amended by changing Section 13 .30, Subd. 2 (C) (3) (e) , to read as follows: (e) Identification of any physical characteristics of the site constituting a susceptibility to erosion and siltation to any adjacent street right-of-wav:, identification of the special measures. if any. to be used to prevent anv erosion to and siltation onto an adjacent street right-of-way: and identification of the -blocation of erosion/sediment control structures, and indication of tYPe such as_ 4hay bales, silt fence, sedimentation basin, ctc. ) . Section 2 . Eagan City Code Chapter Thirteen is amended by changing Section 13 .30, Subd. 13 , to read as follows: Subd. 13. Environmental Protection. The City will enforce environmental protection and erosion control in the development of subdivisions within the City. This includes off development sites as well as wetlands areas. A Handbook on Environmental Protection iz available at City Hall. Section 3. Eagan City Code Chapter 1 entitled "General Provisions and Definitions Applicable to the Entire City Code Including 'Penalty for Violation" and Section 13.99, entitled "Violation a Misdemeanor" are hereby adopted in their entirety by reference as though repeated verbatim. /6o Section 4. Effective Date. This ordinance shall take effect upon its adoption and publication according to law. ATTEST: CITY OF EAGAN City Council By: E. J. VanOverbeke By: Thomas A. Egan Its: Clerk Its: Mayor Date Ordinance Adopted: Date Ordinance Published in the Legal Newspaper: Date of Advisory Planning Commission Hearing: /6/ ORDINANCE NO. 2ND SERIES AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EAGAN, MINNESOTA, AMENDING EAGAN CITY CODE CHAPTER ONE ENTITLED "GENERAL PROVISIONS AND DEFINITIONS" BY AMENDING SECTION 1. 02, SUBD. 7 REGARDING DEFINITION OF STREET AND BY ADDING SECTION 1.02 , SUBD. 7 REGARDING DEFINITION OF BOULEVARD AND BY ADOPTING BY REFERENCE EAGAN CITY CODE CHAPTER 1. The City Council of the City of Eagan does ordain: Section 1. Eagan City Code, Chapter One is hereby amended by changing Section 1.02, Subd. 7, to read as follows: Subd. 7. "Street" and "street right-of-way" means the entire area dedicated to public use, or contained in an easement or other conveyance or grant to the City, and shall include, but not be limited to, roadways, boulevards, sidewalks, trails, alleys and other public property between lateral property lines in which a roadway lies. Section 2. Eagan City Code Chapter One is hereby amended by adding Section 1. 02, Subd. 7. 1, to read as follows: Subd. 7 . 1. "Boulevard" means the area of a street right-of-way that lies between the property line nearest to any street to which such property abuts and the edgeof pavement or back of curb of such street. Section 3. Eagan City Code Chapter 1 entitled "General Provisions and Definitions Applicable to the Entire City Code Including 'Penalty for Violation' "; is hereby adopted in its entirety by reference as though repeated verbatim. Section 4. Effective Date. This ordinance shall take effect upon its adoption and publication according to law. ATTEST: CITY OF EAGAN City Council By: E. J. VanOverbeke By: Thomas A. Egan Its: Clerk Its: Mayor Date Ordinance Adopted: Date Ordinance Published in the Legal Newspaper: /6a. 4 ORDINANCE NO. 2ND SERIES AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EAGAN, MINNESOTA, AMENDING EAGAN CITY CODE CHAPTER SEVEN ENTITLED "STREETS AND SIDEWALKS" BY AMENDING SECTION 7. 05, SUBD. 3 REGARDING PROHIBITION OF TRACKING DIRT, CLAY OR SOIL ONTO STREETS; BY AMENDING SECTION 7.11 REGARDING MOTORIZED VEHICLES PROHIBITED ON SIDEWALKS; BY ADDING SECTION 7.12 REGARDING THE REGULATION OF VEHICLES REQUIRING ACCESS TO CITY RIGHT-OF-WAY BOULEVARDS; AND BY ADOPTING BY REFERENCE EAGAN CITY CODE CHAPTER 1 AND SECTION 7.99. The City Council of the City of Eagan does ordain: Section 1. Eagan City Code Chapter Seven is hereby amended by changing 7.11, to read as follows: SEC. 7. 11. Motorized Vehicles Prohibited On Boulevards And Sidewalks. Except as provided in this Chapter or Chapter 11. it is unlawful for any person to drive,. operate or park a motor vehicle on any boulevard, public sidewalk or other public property designated for use as a pedestrian walkway or bicycle trail, except when crossing the same for ingress and egress via a driveway to private property lying on the other side thereof. Section 2 . Eagan City Code Chapter Seven is hereby amended by adding 7. 12, to read as follows: SEC. 7. 12 . Certain Motorized Vehicles Permitted On Boulevards - Reaulation. A. Public Utility Maintenance Vehicles. Notwithstanding the provisions of the City Code under which motor vehicles are prohibited on boulevards and sidewalks, any person who is an employee or agent of a public utility company or cooperative and within the course and scope of such employment or agency, needs direct access to an area within a boulevard for the exclusive purpose of maintaining any public utilities, excluding any activity that requires a public improvement to be removed, replaced or modified, may drive, operate or park a motor vehicle on such boulevard within the course and scope of such activity upon the City's issuance of an annual permit to the public utility company or cooperative that employs such person. B. Construction Vehicles. Notwithstanding the provisions of Section 7. 11 herein, any person requiring temporary access upon any boulevard, or across any boulevard /63 to such person's abutting private property. for construction or other similar purposes may drive, operate or park, or permit another to drive, operate or park any construction vehicle, construction equipment or any other motor vehicle, upon or across any boulevard or public sidewalk within the course and scope of such construction or other similar activity upon the issuance of a written permit by the City. C. City Vehicles. Notwithstanding the provisions of Section 7. 11 herein, any city employee acting within the course and scope of his/her employment or a contractor acting within the course and scope of a contract with the City may drive, operate or park a motor vehicle on any_ boulevard without a permit issued by the City. subject to any regulations under any administrative policy adopted by the City. D. Performance Standards. All persons permitted to drive, operate, and park a motor vehicle as in accordance with Paragraphs A and B of this Section shall be subject to those standards and regulations set forth in any permit issued pursuant to this Section. Section 3 . Eagan City Code Chapter Seven shall be amended by changing Section 7. 05, Subd. 3, to read as follows: Subd. 3 . Dumping in Streets. It is a misdemeanor for any person to throw, deposit. track or place in onto any street any dirt, soil or clay, waste or abandoned products, including, but not limited to: any nails; soil; glass or glassware; cans; discarded cloth or clothing; metal scraps; garbage; leaves; grass or tree limbs; paper or paper products; shreds or refuse; oil, grease or other petroleum products, or to empty any water containing salt or other injurious chemical thereon. It is a violation of this Section to haul any such material, inadequately enclosed or covered or to fail to remove any dirt, soil or clay from a ;rotor vehicle thereby permitting the same to fall upon streets. It is also a violation of this Section to place or store any building materials or waste resulting from building construction or demolition on any street without first having obtained a written permit from the Council. Section 4. Eagan City Code Chapter Seven shall be amended by adding Section 7.05, Subd. 5. 1, to read as follows: Subd. 5. 1. Tracking Dirt. Clay or Soil onto Streets., A Any person who has a motor vehicle upon any construction site or area shall remove any dirt, clay, soil or other similar substance from such motor vehicle before �6 driving upon anv street right-of-way in order that such dirt. clay or soil shall not be deposited upon the street. It shall be the responsibility of the construction project's development contract obligee and permit holder to immediately cleanup anv siltation, dirt, clay or soil deposited upon any street right-of-way as a result of motor vehicle traffic from such construction site or area or improper or insufficient erosion control measures on such construction site or area. B. All direct or indirect costs incurred by the City for the removal of anv siltation, dirt, clay or soil deposited upon any street not so removed as required in Paragraph A of this Subdivision, shall be charged to the development contract obligee or permit holder. Section 5. Eagan City Code Chapter 1 entitled "General Provisions and Definitions Applicable to the Entire City Code Including 'Penalty for Violation'"; and Section 7.99, entitled "Violation a Misdemeanor" are hereby adopted in their entirety by reference as though repeated verbatim. Section 6. Effective Date. This ordinance shall take effect upon its adoption and publication according to law. ATTEST: CITY OF EAGAN City Council By: E. J. VanOverbeke By: Thomas A. Egan Its: Clerk Its: Mayor Date Ordinance Adopted: Date Ordinance Published in the Legal Newspaper: /65 ORDINANCE NO. 2ND SERIES AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EAGAN, MINNESOTA, AMENDING EAGAN CITY CODE CHAPTER NINE ENTITLED "PARKING REGULATIONS" BY AMENDING SECTION 9.02 REGARDING EXCEPTION TO GENERAL PARKING PROHIBITIONS; AND BY ADOPTING BY REFERENCE EAGAN CITY CODE CHAPTER 1 AND SECTION 9.99. The City Council of the City of Eagan does ordain: Section 1. Eagan City Code Chapter Nine is hereby amended by changing Section 9.02, to read as follows: Sec. 9.02. General Parking Prohibitions. Except as, provided in Chapters 7 and 11, wit is unlawful for any person to stop, stand or park a vehicle except when necessary to avoid conflict with other traffic or in compliance with the specific directions of a police officer or traffic control device in any of the following places: (1) on a sidewalk or trailway; (2) in front of a public or private driveway or trailway; (3) within an intersection; (4) within ten feet of a fire hydrant or mail box; (5) on a crosswalk; (6) within twenty feet of a crosswalk at any intersection; (7) in a sign-posted fire lane; (8) within thirty feet upon the approach to any flashing beacon, stop sign or traffic control signal located at the side of a roadway; (9) within fifty feet of the nearest rail of a railroad crossing; (10) within twenty feet of the driveway entrance to any , fire station and on the side of a street opposite the entrance to any fire station within seventy-five feet of said entrance when properly sign-posted; (11) alongside or opposite any street excavation or obstruction when such stopping, standing or parking would obstruct traffic; (12) on the roadway side of any vehicle stopped or parked at the edge or curb of a street; (14) at any place where official signs prohibit or restrict stopping, parking or both; (15) in any alley, except for loading or unloading and then only so long as reasonably necessary for such loading and unloading to or from adjacent premises; or (16) on any boulevard which as been curbed. Section 2. Eagan City Code Chapter 1 entitled "General Provisions and Definitions Applicable to the Entire City Code Including 'Penalty for Violation' Section 9.99 entitled "Violation a Misdemeanor, " are hereby adopted in their entirety by reference as though repeated verbatim. /644 r Section 3. Effective Date. This ordinance shall take effect upon its adoption and publication according to law. ATTEST: CITY OF EAGAN City Council By: E. J. VanOverbeke By: Thomas A. Egan Its: Clerk Its: Mayor Date Ordinance Adopted: Date Ordinance Published in the Legal Newspaper: /67 Page 11/EAGAN ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES NOVEMBER 24, 1992 • ORDINANCE ANINDNENT8 CITY OF EAGAN Chairman Voracek opened the last public hearing of the evening regarding Ordinance amendments to Chapters 11 and 13 of the City Code - regarding boulevard and trail regulations. City Planner Sturm stated that the main emphasis of the changes were made in Chapter 7, however, the Advisory Planning Commission is requested to act on only Chapters 11 and 13. He further stated that John VonDeLinde, Superintendent of Parks, was available to answer any questions. Miller moved, Hoeft seconded, the motion to approve Ordinance amendments to Chapters 11 and 13 of the City Code regarding boulevard and trail regulations. All present voted in favor. ADJOURNMENT Miller moved, Hoeft seconded, the motion to adjourn the November 24, 1992 Advisory Planning Commission meeting at 8:45 p.m. All voted in favor. Secretary - Eagan Advisory Planning Commission /6ef • 1 • "" MINUTES 0x:ill:OWL:At:mum 1 .c OF THE EAAAN, crrY couNcVi.: ..Eagan,Minnesota November 17, A regular meeting of the Eagan City Counsil.w held on Tuesday,November 17, 1992 at the Eagan Municipal Center. Present were Mayor Egan and Cöundilinembers Wachter,Awada,McCrea, and Pawlenty. Also present were City Administrator Tom Hedges,Acting Community Development Director Jon Hohenstein, Director of Public Works Tom Colbert,and City Attorney James Sheldon. City Administrator Hedges suggested the folkg additOdt to the regular agenda: _ ADD: Extension Weston Wills Final Plat Cp0.0.ig Pawlenty moved,Wachter seconded,iiiiiiiiikiiiio aiiir*Aie agenda for the November 17,1992,regular City Council meeting as amended. Aye: 5 Nay: 0 Mayor Egan made the following correction to the minutes of the November 5,1992,regular City Council meeting Page 4,Paragraph 3, Sentence 1, the refereiiiii6le*mber"should have been"June." •• McCrea moved,Wachter seconded,a motion to.ap*ii*:fli:ii:ininutes of the November 5, 1992,regular City Council meeting as amended. Aye: 5 Nay 0 • 4*5101111191% Larry Wenzel, Chair of the Eagan Economic Development Commission was recognized for his contribution to that commission as a charter member and its only Chair from 1983 to 1992. „...... ...„ „ PrtA1 ICW:F?.-..°4• ••• :•••••:- POLICE DEPARTMENWHUNTI*G LICENSE .....•.• Mayor Egan introduced this item as a request for a hnncig permit for C Kevin Reeve, 4251 Nybro Lane,Eagan. After brief discussion,McCrea moved,Awada seconded,a motion to approve a special hunting permit for the bow hunting of deer on property located at I-35E and Dailey Road. Aye: 4 Nay: 0 Abstain: 1 (Wachter) PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENtAMCA TRAILWAY Mayor Egan introduced this item asj idraIo cash trailway dedication fees. In addition, it was recommended that a related issue;YMCA bii penciit fees, be discussed at this time. City Administrator Hedges provided background on the issue. Harry Gallaher, representing the YMCA, explained that'Jay Shannon's letter (of the YMCA) spelled out their position on both issues. A copy of both letters are included as Exhibit A. City Administrator Hedges advised the Council that if consideration is given to defer any fees, staff recommends no further reductions in • Page 2/EAGAN CITY COUNCIL MINUTES . November 17, 1992 •:•:::. the fee amounts. In addition,he asked that tii *plicant be ma4:iiiiare that a delay in payment of the fees to 1993 would result in fees paid at the 1993 rate:::w0004:40a the applicant was aware and willing to pay the higher fees if necessary. Discussion then continued regarding reducing or eliminating the fees and the precedent that might set. It was noted that the City has not waived development fees for other"public use"facilities such as churches and - schools and Councilmember Wachter added.414.4.:.,p.140be 44.90 to deviate from City policy when others would ask for the same consideration. He woadeitd wlQ tn would pay for the traihvays. •Councilmember McCrea suggested that if the fees are lowered,perliap'Siiiie*11"would provide a payback in the form of use of the facilities. Jay Shannon said the YMCA was very receptive to thiiiPromise and would be happy to work with the City in fostering joint programs and City use of the facilities Mayor Egan asked Mr.Shannon if the YMCA would have any objection to deferring the matter rp10.ifter tryirii*i reach a compromise. Mr.Shannon said they would not. :••••:.:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•• :::•:•:•:•:•:•••••• • Councilmember Pawlenty suggested direction to staff that the City reach a reasonable understanding with the YMCA that the City receive at least an equal value in access to the facility or use over a period of time. Wachter moved,Pawlenty seconded,a motion to continue to the December 1,1992,regular City Council meeting, consideration of the cash trailway:sledication fees for the YMCA 1st Addition, Lot 1, Block 1. Aye: 5 Nay 0 ••.:.:.::•:•:•:•:•:•:.:•:•.... • Awada moved,Wachter seconded,a motif to defer payment of the MWCC Sewer Availability charge, Eagan Sewer Availability Charge, Eagan Water:treatmeut:fre.;i:.gagan Road unit fee, and the Eagan Trail Dedication fee to the time of building permit iss4iie.e***iiiiiiiderstanding that if the building permit is not issued until 1993, the 1993 fee rate will apply Ae S Nay 0 CAPON'ART PARK The City Council asked a number of questions regarding the status of the agreement with Anthony Caponi regarding the tunnel permitting access to the Caponi property and the art park. Councilmember Pawlenty asked issue of expending public money for a private use (either all or part of the subject tunnel) had:I-peen addressed. City Attorney Sheldon said the City has had licening agreements where such action has beeMiermittect.*it complete control was always retained by the City. Mr.Sheldon advised that he had understood.4at once iiii.iisignatures were received and Mr. Caponi agreed to make the payment,that the issue would be reiairchea. said he believes there is a way to do it but they have not looked into the mechanics. Councilmember PawleniPaid he would prefer not to go through the negotiations and raise Mr. Caponi's expectations only to find it is not feasible. Further discussion revealed that Mr. Caponi will not fence half the tunnel for security of the property until the land is placed in a not-for-profit corporation,controlled•Aw:a board of directors and used strictly as an art park for public viewing. Councilmember Pawlenty questioned ether Mr.Caponi's placing the property in the hands of a 501-3C would qualify as a public use. Councihneiiiiir Awada wished it noted that Mr.Caponi is paying for half a public tunnel with privatkAiWiposi Ornsp*.r• ••r Wachter suggested the City proceed with caution regarding the fencing of the tunnel public funds. CONSENT AGENW: City Administrator Hedges acknowledged the addition of Consent Item G, Extension, Final Plat for Weston Hills; and Item H,Licenses, Service Station& Cigarette,SuperAmerica Station,5250 Cliff Road. • • Page 3/EAGAN CITY COUNCIL '''''''•••• November 17, 1992 A. Personnel Items Item 1. Acting Community Develop 'tiii:4 was recommended that Jon Hohenstein be temporarily appointed Acting Community Development Director. B. Licenses. Service Station & Cigarette.Sinclair Station.3946 Nicols Road - It was recommended that the servictk Staci s is .:*da :cigarette license for over-the-counter sales for the Sinclair Station located at 3946 Nicols oad l : ppi shed;>::: C. Licenses.Liquor Renewals 1993 It was recommended that the appl :dot'L # q ipr License renewals be approved as listed (Exhibit B). • D. Approval of Banking Services Proposal It was recommended that the bank services proposal be approved with First Bank Eagan. E. pinal Plat.Whispering Woods Si.;;e0k;4ddition It was recommended that the final plat fqt.Whisperiiwg: foods Seventh Addition be approved. • F. project 641.Receive Petition/Authorizi:Fea01a ti/':1epoit.Plans&Specifications(Wenzel Addition -Streets& Utilities) It was recommended that the petition be received and the preparation of the feasibility report,plans and specifications for Project 641,Wenzel Addition (Streets& Utilities) be approved. G. Extension. Final Plat for Weston Hills It was recommended that an extenSi OA:to:ianlia y 2 lie approved for the Weston Hills final plat. H. licenses. Service Station& Cigarette.Super.{.merica Station,5250 Cliff Road It was recommended that the service station lime anti t#j 'cigarette license for over-the-counter sales for the SuperAmerica Station located at 5250 Cliff Road be apprtivii. Pawlenty moved, Wachter seconded, a motion to approve the Consent Agenda as amended. Aye: 5 Nay. 0 FINAL ASSESSMENT 141$ 1INT WEED NOTICES Mayor Egan introduced this item as the final asses sment•:learing for Delinquent Weed notices. There was no one in the audience who wished to address this item. McCrea moved,Awada seconded,a motion to close the public hearing and approve the final assessment roll for delinquent weed notices and authorized its certification to the County for collection. Aye: 5 Nay. 0 Page 4/EAGAN CITY COUNCIL MINUTt$:•••• November 17, 1992 .:•:•:.:. VACATION/LOTS 9& 10, BOCK 1,CHAT:00'0N PONDS ADDITION Mayor Egan introduced this item as and utility easements for Lots 9 and 10, Block 1,Chatterton Ponds Addition. No objections had been received nor was there any one in the audience who wished to address this item. Pawlenty moved,Wachter seconded,it.mption to close the public hearing and approve the vacation of the common lot line drainage and utility eaif,Mif:***0:4;•:* *:•.pots 9 and 10, Block 1, Chatterton Ponds Addition. Aye: 5 Nay 0 -'•••• -:•:-:•:. •• VACATION/OUTLOTS A,TOWN CENTRE 70":!.0TH& 12TH ADDITIONS Mayor Egan introduced this item ag.:WOiiii'orrkak#01:and utility easements for Outlots A, Town Centre 70- 10th& 12th Additions. There ái no one in the:tiidience to address this item. Wachter moved, McCrea seconded, a motion to vacate drainage and utility easements for Outlots A, Town Centre 70- 10th & 12th Additions. Aye: 5 Nay 0 VACATION/W 20' OF PATRICK ROAD Mayor Egan introduced this item as viaiiiiii:00blig•rpad right-of-way,east 20'of Patrick Road(NW 1/4 of Section 26). There was no one in the aud* nce to address this item. McCrea moved,Awada seconded,a motip to hearing and approve the vacation of the ....... • east 20' of Patrick Road NW 1/4 of Section.W.At.0::5'..Nay 0 FINAL ASSESSMENT HEARING LAKESIDE ESTATES & CEDAR GROVE 7TH ADDITION-STREETLIGHTS Mayor Egan introduced this item as Project 634,Final Assessment Hearing(Lakeside Estates&Cedar Grove 7th Addition- Streetlights). DirectQr4PulAi ::W1:0§:caelrt explained the project and its final costs. He said two formal objections to the assesii4iiiiilii.d:**.06444 • •••••• Gerald Langland, 1777 Taconite Trail, object4o the niod of handling senior citizen deferments. He stated that if he deferred the assessment, at some::iipint it would have to be paid, in addition to all the accrued interest He said if he couldn't pay the assessment miw,*couldn't pay it five years from now ::::•:•:: Joan Perkins of 4048 Halite Lane asked that the project be explained as she had just purchased the property. Pending assessments were explained to Ms.Perkins and it was suggested she contact her real estate agent regarding the possibility of escrowed funds. McCrea moved, Wachter seconded, a motion to clo*:tim public hearing and approve the final . . assessment roll for Project 634(Lakeside Estates&Cedar GroveltflAddition-Streetlights),noting the formal objections, and authorize its certification td:00.00:;01#4:;A:.0::15 Nay 0 PROJECT 600/FINAL ASSESSMENT HEARING TH 149& OPPERMAN 011.tyE Mayor Egan introduced this item as Project 600, Final Assessment Hearing (TR. 149 & Opperman Drive). Director of Public Works Colbert explained the project and those expected to be assessed for its cost. Mr. Colbert said one formal objection had been received. No one was in the audience to address the item. • ::•:•:•:•:•:-:•:•:::•:••••••:•:•••••••••••••••••••:•:•:::•: Page 5/EAGAN CITY COUNCIL MINUTES November 17, 1992 Awada moved,Pawlenty seconded,a motki V..close*Aiic hearing and approve the final assessment roll for Project 600(TM. 149 and Opperman Diiiikii:.#4**4ijiiiilmprovements)and authorize its certification to Dakota County. Aye: 5 Nay: 0 ••••:•:•:•:•:••••:•%" PROJECT 601R/LONE OAK ROAD RECONSTRUCTION I-35E TO TH 149/55 Mayor Egan introduced this item AL.Poj tQRI Lwc Oak Road Reconstruction (I-35E to T.H. • 149/55). Director of Public Works Colbert providgiia briefi:Qtoty of the project and introduced the representatives from the Dakota County Highway Depiiiiiiient,Pete Sorenson and Dave Everds. Mark Hanson from Bonestroo, Rosene,Anderlik and Associates was..":01so in agOdance to explain the utility portion of the project. Pete Sorenson gave an overview of*Project 601R. He said the County intends to begin in May with construction to continue most of the year. He is confident the intersection of Lone Oak and Lexington Roads will remain open through out the entire construction. Mr. Sorenson said the road should be finished in November with final completion in the spring of 1994. Mark Hanson explained the utility portion of the project and their related costs. He said the City expects its share to be approximately$2,147,000 for streets,watermain and sewer services with$1,260,000 to comegOm Assessments and$887,000 to come from City funds. ....... ••• • ........... ••• ••• The City Council then discussed the cbanliqii:4:%***9ad crossing and questioned why the crossing was designed at grade. Mr. Everds said that because the iiiiient.railroad crossing has minimum height and width clearances, it would have to be rebuilt, aiOng..snbsta00:::e*Osts to the project A number of safety concerns were expressed; however, it was pointed:0:.*:*::iiiecirossing would have a crossing arm, bells and lights,which seem to be effective. The public hearing was then opened to the public. Gerald Hartke,an attorney,was present representing the homeowers of 821,825, 835 and 855 Lone Oak Road. These residential properties are a non-conforming use in a commercial zone and Mr.Hartke objected to the assessment which he said was almost two and one-half times the residential rate. Mr. Hartke noted that these are modest properties of little commercial value individually. He asserted that the value of 4.*:**4:#0.iggfilxi*ustain the amount of the assessments and suggested the City purchase the properties as a commercial property. -•••• •:::•:•: Don Orin,Dart Transit,had several concerns including tlioe:#hift of the road to the south. He said such an alignment would result in the loss of property and Would bring traffic closer to the building and two single family homes on the Dart property In discussion of the railroa$nrossing, Mr. Orion suggested the railroad bridge be retained because the existing bridge serves any legal triaaritrailer now. Mr.Orin's major concern, however,was the loss of one of two driveways serving Dart Transit. He said he had serious safety concerns with only one driveway access which would mix truck and automobile traffic. He maintained that there should be individual access to what is basically two parcels. The City Council reminded Mr.Orin that when Dart Transit developed, the single family homes on the property were allowe4::0 remain with the understanding that they would be removed with the upgrade of Lone Oak Road. In additii*Director of Public Works Colbert said that having two driveways so dose to the Lone 90/34#ngt.oa intersection would present a safety hazard. :•:•:. Max Steininger,3070 Lexington Soigestion that project feasibility be discussed at this meeting with financial feasibility discussed later at the fi0i:assessment hearing. He said it should be determined how the upgrade will be paid for before initiating theWject. In addition,Mr.Steininger suggested the City look at its policy for paying the costs of upgrading feeder'greets because improvement of these road are a City problem not an individual homeowner problem. He questioned any increased value to his property with this project and went on to recommend that the City put a mechanism in place to determine the value before and after improvements. In response to Mr. Steininger, Councilmember Pawlenty said the City has • Page 6/EAGAN CITY COUNCIL MINUTES:'' ''::? ; November 17, 1992 considered a spot appraisal on street projecta:�before but a pry*p iraisal of all properties would not be cost effective. • Harlan Bluhm,2995 Lexington Avenue,objected to the median and its restriction of access in and out of their property. Mr.Bluhm also indicated that a center turn lane would be sufficient. Jim Luzum of Villaume Industries asked several questions regarding access during construction and the realignment of Lone Oak Circle. Pete Sorenson explained that becau ;; ii iiiaj ttSt•Ale~aid highway,it must be designed to State standards and that includes a median. Mr.Sorenon 'aid•tl;at'niv3ded highways have proven to be the safest highways and provide for the smoothest traffic flow. Mary Rahn,3050 Lexington Avenue,expres s concdt&about the right-of-way line impacting his garage. Mark Hanson explained that the p ;was reaucod:*a lessen the impact on his property and that action will be more visible when final staking'occurs. James Roberts appeared representing Crate Prospects. He stated that based on growth,the road is not necessary and cited land that has not developed,buildings that have not sold and corporations that are laying off employees. He questioned whether the City can afford the project. Mr.Roberts further stated the need for access to his property if his business is to succeed. He asked whether the County would either minimize the length of the median or provide access cuts in:she mcdian. He also discussed the need to lower the cost of the project or cancel the proposal in its entirety. A number of Councilmembers expressed tlicir conceros.tatAle median would harm business for owners in that area and asked County representatives vi by the met iati couldn't be painted on the blacktop. Pete Sorenson said that it could be done and is done;v#ien th traffic volume is such that it is safe. Unfortunately, he added that it is difficult to forewarn of iges''in road alignment when inclement weather can obscure a "painted"median. Mark Anderson of Opus and representing Northwestern Mutual Life,spoke for the owners of 24 parcels when he pointed out that current market conditions would not allow them to recoup the costs of these assessments. He noted it was questionable that cpinmer. al/ii�c}3strial properties received additional value from improved roads because increased traffic do snot mccea e t Stt%al business. He suggested alternate means of financing: State-aid money,assessment of neighboripg.propeities.utilizing the road,tax increment financing, or money collected from road unit charges. Mr.Anderson went on tb say that the present road suits the needs of the properties he represents and the proposed me•$tap would:.b'ock the main entrances to some of their tenants. He, too, suggested that a road layout similar::Xq:Pilot•140 Road be installed with a center lane for turns. Mr.Anderson asked several questions regarding water quality charges and Mayor Egan suggested that such policy questions be addressed with staff prior to the final assessment hearing. Tom Barrett of the Minnesota State Lottery indicated y have been working with one of their subcontractors to locate next to the Lottery office's present location::.He said the median affects the convenience of that location and could interfere with any: ;.t1feS:ha a tt ;l .Mansion. At that time,the Mayor returned discussion to the City Council. Councilmember McCrea noted serious concerns about the project and the financial hardship to net ioring businesses. She said it was her recommendation to upgrade the intersection and traffic signals but:to delay the remainder of the project one to two years. Councilmember Wachter said the upgrade was needed, including the street improvements, intersection and signal lights but he remained opposed to the median. When Councilmember Pawlenty also expressed his concerns, Director of Public Works Colbert said improvements for this area had been reviewed •:.: :• Page 7/EAGAN CITY COUNCIL MINUTO•• ::::::::: November 17, 1992 • by the Council on two occasions and if 601.1t were not approved,duff would need further direction as to what improvements should be addressed. Councilmeigi4;41$40494iil some type of improvement was needed but had questions about Dart.Transit's driveway acceiiiiii; iii&fian and why the road was being shifted to the south. Mr.Everds said that traffic on Lone Oak Road has increased substantially in the past two years. He said the volumes of traffic being discussed call.for:.**tallation Oa median;however,he suggested returning to the County Board regarding changes in thie*****.itio:LiiiiiPak Road on Lexington. Mr.Everds said the County may be willing to shorten the northern median as long:* it is understood that this is an interim solution and may require change in the future. As two driay accesses for Dart Transit,Director of Public Works Colbert advised that Dart would still hay.c.:pyo drivevrayA but they would enter onto a frontage road which in turn would access Lone Oak Road. Mr. G4if6ikpoini4it that Dart could also ntilim their access onto Highway 55. Dave Everds then expla140::40:I:ini:.0.440 was shifted to the south because using the old alignment would mean the acquisition or 2000 additiolia:fe:ii of right of way to meet standards. Because the Council continued to have a number of concerns,Councilmember McCrea moved,Wachter seconded,a motion to continue consideration of Lexington/Lone Oak intersection improvements to the January 19, 1993, regular City Council meeting with the remainder of the Project continued for two years. •••... ...........•.... Director of Public Works Colbert suggested that the Council wished to institute only the intersection improvements, that they consider cancelling Piiiiti:*:*:*00wancl bring the original Project 601 back for consideration at the January 19 meeting. After.::.tidditiiiiiA:::iliieitssion, he asked that the Council consider approving just the intersection portion of the project with approval.k.f the plans and specifications delayed until all problems are addressed. Councilmember McCrea then withai ew her original motion and moved, with Wachter seconding, a motion to bring the intersection portion of the project back in 60 days with changes in the north median and a possible curb cut for Mary Rahn. Aye: 2 Nay: 3(Egan, Pawlenty&Awada) Motion failed. Mayor Egan suggested a motion approving,in concept,Project 601R Lone Oak/Lexington intersection improvements as originally presented in Proo5:::(11%:but;:pq:....vmving plans and specifications until design modifications are taken into consideration iitakiiliikeili :044#00edian. There was no second. McCrea moved,Wachter seconded,a motion t..4:: ontinuethe January 19,1993,regular City Council meeting the intersection portion of Project 601R. Ay0::::$ Nay: Because she did not feel well, Councilmember McCrea iaiihe meeting at approximately 10:25 p.m. MEMINESS. PROJECT 622/FINAL ASSESSMENT HEARING CEDAR INDUSTRIAL PARK Mayor Egan introduced this item as Project 622, Final Assment Hearing (Cedar Industrial Park - Street Renovation-Continued from Novem1104:::rtitIlikTkklic Works Colbert reviewed Mr.Parranto's complaint that JPK Park Incorporated had meeting notices and explained the City's notification process. He said the address on file with the City is.*:correct one for JPK and their notices had not been returned by the Post Office as undeliverable. Because of the length of the meeting,Mr.Parranto was no longer present;however,Acting Community Development Director Hohenstein reported that Mr. Parranto had read Director of Public Works Colbert's memo regarding additional issues of concern and was satisfied. P a g e 8/EAGAN CITY COUNCIL)1 :.... • November 17, 1992 ••••••• Pawlenty moved, Wachter secondekpotion to dos :tiae public hearing and approve the final assessment roll for Project 622 (Cedar Industri4:P4::.:**igenovation) and authorize its certification to Dakota County. Aye: 4 Nay: 0 REZONING/PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AMENDMENT PRELIMINARY PLAT/WEST PUBLISHING 6TH ADDITION Mayor Egan introduced this item iii:..******.*:;V:OC?ublishing 6th Addition/West Publishing Company,of approximately 2.2 LI(Light Incinitiiii)•ite*to a M.(1'lanned Development)District,a planned development amendment, incorporating the area iniikihe We.ii:::Publishing Planned Development, and a preliminary plat consisting of one lot on approximately:4:7 acres,1peatted on the north side of Wescott Road in the SE 1/4 of Section 13. •••••••:•::•• • ••. •••••••••:••••••••••::::::::::".. After brief discussion,Steve Bryant,'re•piesenting Wiitiiiblishing„said that only the excavating is being done at this time and West has no plans for additional construction. He added, however, that when any construction does begin, it will be the same warehouse-type construction as exists at West Publishing now. Wachter moved, Awada seconded, a motion to approve a rezoning for West Publishing 6th Addition/West Publishing Company of appr(pcimately 2.2.LI (Light Industrial) acres to a PD (Planned Development) District. Aye: 4 Nay 0 •• Awada moved, Wachter seconded, a potion tGapprove a planned development amendment, incorporating the area into the West Publishing pinned dey0.90*.iit district Aye: 4 Nay 0 Awada moved, Wachter seconded,r: ni$00O.approve a preliminary plat consisting of one lot on approximately 4.7 acres located on the nortkided Wescott Road in the SE 1/4 of Section 13 and subject to the following conditions: 1. These standard conditions of plat approval as adopted by Council action on July 10, 1990,shall be complied with: Al, Bi,B3, Cl, C2, C4, D1, El,F • 2. The final plat shall include a 10 foot drainae:Ond utiliekOsement along the Wescott Road right-of- way. •••.: :•:•:•:- . .:•:•:•: ::•:•:•:. 3. The final plat shall include a 50 foot half right-of-wayiot,Wescott Road. 4. This development shall remove the existing driveways along Wescott Road along the south property line of this plat. 5. The development will be responsible for abandoning**sting wells and septic systems on this site in accordance with City and County requirements. Aye: 4 Nay 0 NEW BUSINESS MAC NOISE BUDGET RECOMMENDATION Mayor Egan introduced this item as a recommendation, Airport Relations Committee, MAC Noise Budget. City Administrator Hedges said that the Airport Relations Committee recommended the Eagan City • • Page 9/EAGAN CITY COUNCIL • November 17, 1992 "' •• ' Council adopt a position which supports nego(1adtit}qf new c QBi iirO▪ iensive voluntary noise agreements with all passenger airlines serving MSP. Pawlenty moved,Awada seconded, a motion to approve a recommendation by the Airport Relations Committee to endorse to the Metropolitan Airports Commission the position that new comprehensive voluntary noise reduction agreements be negotiated with all passenger airlines serving Minneapolis/St.Paul. Aye: 4 Nay: 0 ANNEXATION OF LAND/EAG4 ::&flNV :GROVE HEIGHTS Mayor Egan introduced this item as resolutiiii for the;:j ncurrent detachment and annexation of incorporated land, cities of Eagan and Inver,Grovc•l e' s.in.a r:ittta located west of Highway 3. Pawlenty moved, Wachter seconded,a motion to approve the concurrent detachment and annexation of incorporated land as proposed between the cities of Eagan and Inver Grove Heights for land located between the border of the two cities and curves of Highway 3 just immediately north and south of Diffley Road. Aye: 4 Nay: 0 SIDEYARD POOl:S:ETBACK/CHATTERTON PONDS Mayor Egan introduced this item as a foF i :.$tudt, of 5' to the required 5' sideyard pool setback on Lot 10, Block 1, Chatterton Ponds, locgt:ed in thie:SW j/•4 of Section 22. Acting Community Development Director d iateid said that staff had recommended that the variance be conditioned upon an agreement by Mr. $ti?dt:ltdF'iio action will be brought against the City in the future regarding the location of the pool. Mr. Studs,who was present, agreed. Awada moved, Wachter seconded, a motion to approve a variance for Gene Studt of 5 feet to the required 5 foot sideyard pool setback on Lot 10,Block 1, Chatterton Ponds as presented,contingent upon the vacation of drainage and utility easements on Lot 10, Block 1, and Lot 9, Block 1, of Chatterton Ponds and contingent upon an agreement by Mr. Studs t at i4:f>tute::action•Will be brought against the City due to the location of the pool and subject to the follovvrag: iitlinns :::::::::::::::::::: • L All affected easements shall be vacated to pity requireit ents. 2. The variance shall be subject to all applicable City CoibtB. Aye: 4 Nay: 0 VARIANCE/BUILDING SIGNAGE/EDINA REALTY Mayor Egan introduced this item as a variance for Edia ealty to allow building signage on a non- street side. Acting Community Development•Dir c or•:Hohenst'•ein explained the application. He said the variance was the result not so much of har 3 b it;iiif p# t C2 Greg Mason, corporate counsel for Edina Realty, expiped during the development process, they believed they would be permitted signage on all four sides of the ibllding. Mr.Mason indicated,however,that they would be willing to forego signage on the north and south buiding elevations if they are permitted signage on the east and west building elevations. Page 10/EAGAN CITY COUNCIL MINU`rES • November 17, 1992 Wachter moved,Awada seconded,a ni p;fn approve a variance based on practical necessity for Edina Realty to allow building signage on a non-street'siik.ifr& liii a Realty Metropolitan Federal Bank Building located at 1250 Yankee Doodle Road and subject to.tl'ie'. oliowing condition: 1. The signage shall be subject to all applicable Sign Code requirements and a one-time sign fee of 52.50/sq.ft. Councilmember Pawlenty asked if#this sigaa 'wa :'3it:8i tion to or in lieu of a pylon sign. Mr. Hohenstein noted it was in addition to. Aye: 4 Nay: 0 VARIANCE/Sk%EVII ,'i'ING HOMES Mayor Egan introduced this item as a variance for Everlasting Homes,of 10'to the required 50'setback on Johnny Cake Ridge Road, located on Lot 17, Block 1, Mallard Park 2nd Addition. Acting Community Development Director Hohenstein explained the variance application and reported that the applicant believed when he purchased the property that the setbacks were the same from both streets. The hardship for the applicant would be to now redesign the • Mayor Egan asked the applicant if he had spokeo:to the::other property owners in the neighborhood and he indicated he had not It was noted that othn=.variances.'have;been granted for other properties in the neighborhood for the same reason. Councilmembex:Awada;als pointed out that with the variance a larger home would be permitted. • Awada moved, Egan seconded, a motion to approve a variance for Everlasting Homes of 10' to the required 50' setback for property on Johnny Cake Ridge Road located on Lot 17, Block 1, Mallard Park 2nd Addition, and subject to the following conditions: 1. No other setback variances shall be granted. 2. All applicable City Codes. • Aye: 4 Nay: 0 SPECIAL USE PERMIT/MARV ANDERSON H:OliilES/TEMPORARY SIGN Mayor Egan introduced this item as a special use permit for,Mary Anderson Homes,Inc., located at the north end of Meghah Lane in the NE 1/4 of Section 30. Acting Community Development Director Hohenstein explained the application. Kim Bardwell was present representing Mary Anderson Homes and indicated they had agreed to all conditions. Pawlenty moved,Awada seconded,a matiQA to.agpipve, .special use permit for Mary Anderson Homes, Inc.,for a temporary free-standing ground*00:I.!!ver 1'imt:1 ei ht lhe north end of Meghans Addition just south of Diftley Road and subject to the following coriilfilioiiisi • 1. All applicable Sign Code requirements and a one-ti :sign fee of 52.50/sq.ft. 2. The sign shall be located at least 10'from all property lines. 3. The sign is temporary and shall be removed one year from date of approval. • Page 11/EAGAN CITY COUNCIL MINUS November 17, 1992 Ms. Bardwell asked that the application;be::fpr:tw.o. is:;tnd Council suggested that)f the sign is still needed after one year that they apply for a . Aye: 4 Nay: 0 PRELIMINARY PLAT/CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TOWN C :?lQ=a l #:i DITION Mayor Egan introduced this item as a prelimini:plat for t'i iyn Centre 70-13th Addition/McDonald's Corporation,consisting of one approximately.84 acre lot,and an outlot,and a conditional use permit,to allow a Class II restaurant in a Community Shopping Cente.: Strict loc*aalong the west side of Town Centre Drive in the NW 1/4 of Section 15. City AdminiArA .:fledgcia saict at the item had been before the Advisory Planning Commission at their October 27 mei ting'and th*p:tii :recommended approval. Acting Director of Community Development Hohenstein reviewed the application and cited the APC's concerns regarding traffic circulation, the drive through, parking, and access. Fred Reynolds, Project Manager for McDonald's, described the new concept of face-to-face ordering wherein the customer will order at Point 1,pay:*.Point 2 and pick up the order at Point 3. He indicated this system was being instituted to improve cusfomei(:service:.and reduce errors. In answer to questions, Mr. Reynolds reported that 54-58%of McDonald's business'is drii n-through. In addition,he said 73 drive-through customers can be served per hour using a single wydow but 11 -:.13p can be served using a two or three point pick up. He assured the Council that drive-through tra€f, c ti*;(hove quickly in and out of McDonald's thus reducing traffic congestion. • Discussion then ensued regarding traffic circulation and the layout of the parking lot and property. It was suggested that Federal Land seek a waiver of plat to allow a squaring of the property helping to alleviate congestion concerns at the entrance and exit portion of the property. Martin Colon of Federal Land said they preferred not to do that pointing to the shape of the parcel and landscaping plans which he said would add visual interest to the property. The architect representing 1 D.9.pald's reviewed revised site plans which widened the entrance and exit areas. Questions were also a.* i i r gar4:0; oving the handicapped stalls; however, discussion revealed them to be in the most'appropriate.locatiaa:'1VIir. Reynolds said that McDonald's designs many such restaurants each year and traffic circulation, parking.siieeds and safety are all given the utmost attention. Wachter moved,Pawlenty seconded,a motion to approve aiipScrminary plat for McDonald's Corporation consisting of one approximately.84 acre lot and an outlot,subject to the following conditions: 1. These standard conditions of plat approval as adopted by Council action on July 10, 1990,shall be complied with: Al.Bl,B2, Cl, C2, C4, C5,D1,El, Fl,Gi, and H1 • 2. The site shall be irrigated. 3. All rooftop mechanical equipment shall be screened If.*view at each property line. 4. The trash/recycling containers shall be located within the building or in an enclosure large enough to accommodate recycling bins made of the identical building material. 5. All signage shall be subject to sign code requirements and a one-time fee of S2.50 per square foot. Page 12/EAGAN CITY COUNCIL MINUTES November 17, 1992 6. The landscape plan shall be subniii.*:9n..the apr.4.04rading plan. • 7. Continuous berming is required along 8. Additional overstory trees and shrub planting materials shall be provided along the north and south property lines and shall be approved by the City Planner. The landscaping will continue north 5 feet onto Outlot A. 9. Brick building materials shall be required oii:a sides of building and shall remain unpainted and left in a natural state. 10.A minimum drive aisle width of.2,4".4.011::fifii4intAiriiiii:: ••••••.•••...•.•.•.• ••••••.••.....•••••••• 11.The developer shall add a storm sewer stub to the future development to the north of Outlot A of Town Centre 70- 13th Addition. 12.The development shall design the parking lot to drain to the concrete curb and gutter and then to the proposed storm sewer to avoid bituminous wales in the parking lot. .•.....•.. 13. This development will be respoiii*::fiiii.:app,structing a concrete apron and valley gutter at the driveway openings to Town Centre Drive. • Aye: 3 Nay: 1 (Awada) • Wachter moved,Pawlenty seconded;:.**iiiiii4O approve a conditional use permit to allow a Class II restaurant in a Community Shopping Centek:•aisirict located along the west side of Town Centre Drive in the NW1/4 of Section 15. Aye: 4 Nay 0 ORDINANCE AMENDMENT/CHAPTERS 11 & 13 Mayor Egan introduced this item as:p:44#4400:r3g:.01:10ance, Chapter 11,Zoning, Sections 10.16, Shade Trees and Landscaping; 10.17, Ldli1iiii::•1264iiii44100.18, Irrigation System; 10.19, General Screening and Buffers; 10.20, Buffers; 10.21, Unlawful pltting of.Tres and Shrubs; 10.22 Protection of Large Trees; 1023, Street Trees; 1024, Prohibited Tree Species, 10.25 :.kiohibited Use of Trees; and Chapter 13, Subdivision Regulations (Platting), Section 13.30, Dat*::md pes0. Standards It was noted that staff had recommended this item be continued indefinitely. *-• •• •• Pawlenty moved,Wachter seconded,a motion to continue consideration of this ordinance amendment indefinitely. Aye: 4 Nay 0 its,01011VIIIIIMPIMMAREMMI REsow.pomm hilp;*45AD City Administrator Hedges introduii4i:iiii6Iiiii6iiiigarting reopening of the Ayd Mill Road during the period the Mendota Bridge will be closed. He said the City of:Mendota Heights had requested that the City adopt such a resolution and the resolution was presented to the( Council for their consideration. Egan moved, Pawlenty seconded, a motion to approve a resolution concerning the closing of the Mendota Bridge and the reopening of the Ayd Mill Road. Aye: 3 Nay 0 Abstain: 1 (Wachter) • Page 13/EAGA• CITY COUNCIL MINUTES November 17, 1992 NORTHEAST EGAN'TIF DISTRICT Mayor Egan introduced this item as direction regarding use of tax increment financing proceeds from the Northeast Eagan TIP District. City Administrator Hedges indicated the City is approaching the time deadline by which proceeds from the Northe r:T,Ei?•n ns b :spent. He said improvements must be made to Highway 149 and staff is recommending that iiiiii:iiithigliniOceeds be used for that improvement. Councilmember Awada asked what else the proceeds could a used for and City Administrator Hedges remarked that expenditures must have a public pug3.0.4.within*}ie district and were originally intended for transportation improvements. Mayor Egan said tbaL :! ity:0.04ii maintain the integrity of that principle. • Awada moved,Pawlenty seconded,a motion to authorize a staff response regarding the use of the tax increment financing proceeds from the Northeast Eagan TIF District with the understanding that specific details of the transportation improvement and the TIF amendment will be forwarded to the Council in the near future. Aye: 4 Nay: 0 ALLOCATION ADJU IEN J/STORM WATER UTILITY FUND • Mayor Egan introduced this item as an aUocatioa:aii 'neat for the storm water utility fund. After brief discussion,Wachter moved,"0:40.00404 'motion to approve the storm water utility fund allocation adjustments as recommended..:..Aye: .4 *NO('0 MgliORS:T.013131ROW SIGN REQUEST/DICK HERZOG Mr.Dick Herzog approached the CQpn ii toward the close of the meeting saying on October 20 he had applied for a variance to the sign ordinance:tega'rd signage:fit the Rahncliff Center. He was then told by staff that he would not need a.variance and told'liis`'iustomef'Hiatt'if'would not be necessary. Mi. Herzog was displeased that he now would need to go before the A49.isory P lagning Commission and the City Council with the liklihood that he would not receive permission for:his signage.:i ptil January, City Administrator Hedges said that because the applica g:bras rhaneng the location of the building signage, a change would be required in the PD agreement. Because of the confusion, however, City Administrator Hedges said it may be in order to review the application at the November 24 special City Council meeting, Acting Director of Community Development Director Hohenstein said that if Mr.Herzog would be willing to move the sign height into conformity with the other signage on the building, the matter could be handled administratively. Mr.Herzog said he had asked staff 4i0ia must install signage at a specific height and they had not been able to provide that information. Counciliiiititilber Pawlenty advised that he had been on the Advisory Planning Commission at the tip: :R hncW cameArough and he remembered that the signage was to be uniform. Wachter moved,Awada seconded,a motion to defer co*Oration of the Rahncliff signage issue to the November 24,1992,special City Council meeting with the underling that if it does not require City Council action,it will be handled by staff administratively. Aye: 4 Nay: 0 Page 14/EAGAN CITY COUNCIL MIlsitittS • November 17, 1992 Sit Atm-• .tivErtAbg Awada moved,Egan seconded,a motion directing staff to prepare a study/mapping of all D-II property in the City of Eagan. Aye: 4 Nay: 0 Wachter moved,Awada seconded,a motion to approve&Checklist dated November 17,1992,in the amount of S678,151.87. Aye: 4 Nay 0 The City Council adjourned the regular meeting to an executive session to consider collective bargaining issues at 12:15 a.m. Those in attendance were Mayor Egan, Councihnembers Awada, Pawlenty and Wachter, City Administrator Hedges,and City Attorney Sheldon. The executive session was adjourned at approximately 12:45 p.m. CITY OF KF EAGAN City Clerk • • • lyou need these minutes in an alternative form such as large print,braille,audio tape,dc.,please contact the ay of Eagan, 3830 Film Knob Roa4 Eagan,MN 55122 (612)681-4604 (TDD phone: (612)454-8535). • .... • • AMMMOIIM EXHIBIT A • 1993 RENEWALS ON-SALE LIOUOR Al Baker Starks I, Inc: 3434 Washington Dr. dba Starks Saloon Eagan, MN 55122 Gary Starks,Pres. 3125 Dodd Rd, 55121 Cedarvale Bowl, Inc. LaN, Inc. Cedarvale Lanes/Fitz's Bar & Grill Michael Henke, Mgr. dba Valley Lounge 3883 Beau D'Rue Dr. James Tousignant, Pres. 3883 au 55ue 3385 Sibley Memorial Hwy. Sagan, MN 55122 Eagan Airport Hotel Associates CLUB ON-SALE • dba Holiday Inn Deryk Funkhouser, Mgr. Spur, Inc. 2700 Pilot Knob Rd. dba Lost Spur Country Eagan, MN 55121 try Club Harry Beyer, Mgr. Cliff Corporation 2750, Sibley Memorial Hwy. dba J. Doolittles Sagan, 55121 • Lynn Reimer, owner 2140 Cliff Rd. Approved '92 - Open '93 Eagan, MN 55122 • • Dougherty's Midwest Restaurant Associates Robert Dougherty, owner dba Applebee's Neighborhood 1312 Town Center Dr. eeBar & Grill Eagan, MN 55123 Lisa Herboldt, Manager 1335 Town Casper's Cherokee Sirloin Room, Eagan, Inc. Eagan, MM Centre Drive dba Casper's Cherokee Sirloin Room, Eagan 55122 Richard Casper, Treas. Chili's of Minnesota, Inca 4625 Nicols Rd. dba Chili's Southwest Bar/ Grill Eagan, MN 55122 3625 Pilot Knob Road Cuz, Inc. Eagan, MN 55122 dba LaFonda de los lobos Otis. Trujillo, Pres. 3665 Sibley Memorial Hwy. Eagan,. MN 55122 Hussein Ansari Mediterranean Cruise 3945 Sibley Memorial Hwy. • Eagan, MN 55122 West Jersey Associates, Inc. dba Richards Joyce Slattery, President 4185 So. Robert Tr. Eagan, MN 55123 1993 2211=1119 • OPT-SALE LIOMOR Applebaum Companies, Inc. dba Big Top Wines & Spirits Mike Buckman, Mgr. 3900 Beau D'Rue Dr. Eagan, MN 55122 • Scott Liquor Company dba Cheers Wine & Spirits • Scott Kruger, Mgr. 1970 Rahn Cliff Court #300 Eagan, MN 55122 Perrier & Associates, Inc. dba Great Northern Spirits David Perrier, Owner 1960 Cliff Lake Rd. #101 Eagan, MN 55122 Kenny's Enterprises, Inc. dba Kenny's Liquor John Mattson, Mgr. 1444 Yankee Doodle Rd. Eagan, MN 55122 Liquor Shoppe, Inc. of Eagan dba Liquor Shoppe of Eagan Greg Ward, Owner 4250 Lexington Ave. So. Eagan, MN 55122 Spirits of Eagan, Inc. dba MGM Warehouse John Teslaw, Partner 4182 Pilot Knob Rd. Eagan, MN 55122 Sidco, Inc. dba Big Top Wines & Spirits • Tim Martin, Mgr. 1282 Town Center Dr. Eagan, MN 55123 1993 RENEWALS 'Also has wine license ON-SALE BEER **Also has strong beer license D ni's'be.** Pisa Hut of America,Inc . Pizza Hut of America,Inc dba Davanm''s Pizza/Hot Hoagies dba Pizza Hut#401023 1980 Cliff Lake Road - dba Pizza Hut#401025 Eagan,MN 55122 1325 Town Centre Dr. 2130 Cliff Road 688-6111 5 Mn 55123 Eagan,MN 55122 • dba Aanas Inc Diamond T Ranch Inc' 1960 Cliff Lake R#116 dba Diamond T Ranch • Eagan,MN 55122 4889 Pilot Knob Road 454.85434 55122 454-1464 Apples Plus,Inc." Dragon Palace Restaurant dba Apples Restaurant Lee Po Len,Owner 1260 Town Centre Dr. 1466 Yankee Doodle Rd. Eagan,MN 55123 Eagan,MN 55122 683-9145 4544493 John Oaken** Clung Wong,Inc.° dba Broadway Pizza dba Hong Wong Restaurant 3902 Beau D'Rue Dr. 2139 Cliff Road Eagan,MN 55122 Eagan,MN 55122 452-5044 452-0086 Q Burger FH,Inc* Nancy Rieser, owner dba Hunan Garden 1428 Yankee Doodle Rd 1304 Town Centre Dr. Eagan,MN 55122 Eagan,MN 55123 452-1473 • James A.Basta** West End Hunting Club • dba Italian Pie Shoppe/Wmery Mark Steinhoff 1438 Yankee Doodle Rd. 535 Gun Club Road Eagan,MN 55122 Rosemount,MN 55068 452-4525 423-2429 Ftatelli Tre,Inc." Parkview Golf Club Carbone's Pizzeria Don Larsen,Owner • 1665 Yankee Doodle Rd. 1310 Cliff Road Eagan,MN 55122 Eagan,Mn 55123 452-6000 452-5098 Carriage Hills Country Club Piccolo's William Smith,Owner James Ezzell,Jr.,Owner 3535 Wescott Hills Dr. 4162 Pilot Knob Rd. Eagan,MN 55123 Eagan,MN 55122 452-nil 4.54-1212 1993 RENEWALS OFF-SALE BEER Gateway Foods, Inc. Birch Bru, Inc. dba Brooks Superette #43 dba Superamerica #4049 3390 Coachman Rd. Diffiey Rd. & Hwy. 13 Eagan, MN 55121 Eagan, MN 55122 688-2001 Superamerica #4182 Super Valu Stores, Inc. 1406 Yankee Doodle Rd. dba CUB Eagan, MN 55122 1940 Cliff Lake Rd. 452-9853 Eagan, MN 55122 454-4606 Superamerica #4335 1379 Town Centre Dr. Crown Coco, Inc. Eagan, MN 55123 dba Eagan E-Z Stop • 688-2870 4195 Nicols Rd. Eagan, MN 55122 Tom Thumb Food Market 452-9309 dba Tom Thumb #259 2125 Cliff Rd. Holiday Stationstore, Inc. Eagan, MN 55122 dba Holiday Stationstore #232 454-4868 4595 Nicola Rd. Eagan, MN 55122 Tom Thumb #273 4130 Blackhawk Rd. Holiday Stationstore #247 Eagan, MN 55122 3615 Pilot Knob Rd. 688-8614 Eagan, MN 55122 683-9936 Tom Thumb #166 1446 Yankee Doodle Rd. PDQ Food Stores of MN, Inc. Eagan, MN 55122 dba PDQ #287 452-4874 1969 Silver Bell Rd. Eagan, MN 55122 PDQ #214 • 4198 Pilot Knob Rd. Eagan, MN 55122 452-5846 • Gateway Foods, Inc. - dba Rainbow Foods #15 1276 Town Centre Dr. Eagan, MN 55123 452-9506 1993 RENEWALS SINE LICENSES Chungs, Inc. Diamond T Ranch, Inc. dba Anna Chungs Restaurant 1960 Cliff Lake Rd. Suite 116 4889 Diamond T Ranch Rd. Eagan, MN 55122 48$9 Pilot knob Rd. 454-8543 Began, MN 55122 • 454-1464 Apples Plus, Inc. Chun Won dba Apples g g• Inc. Pat Boland, Mgr. dba Hong Wong Restaurant 1260 Town Centre Dr. 2139 Cliff Rd. Eagan, MN 55123 52-00 6 55122 4 683-9195 452-0086 John Odeen !'HF, Inc. dba Broadway Pizza dba Hunan Garden 3902 Beau D'Rue Dr. 1304 Town Centre Dr. Eagan, Began, MN 55122 55123 452-5444 452-0905 Fratelli Tre, Inc. dba Carbone's Pizzeria 1665 Yankee Doodle Rd. Eagan, MN 55122 452-6000 James A. Basta dba Italian Pie Shoppe & Winery 1438 Yankee Doodle Rd. Eagan, MN 55122 452-4525 Davanni's Inc. Davanni's Pizza& Hot Hoagies 1980 Cliff Lake Rd. Eagan, MN 55122 688-6111 Q Burger Nancy Rieser, Owner 1428 Yankee Doodle Rd. Eagan, MN 55122 452-1473 • , . • EXHIBIT B November 10, 1992• .;,-..--.„-- ,. Mr. Dale Runkle .: Director of Community Development .lir _ City of Sagan 3830 Pilot Knob Road • riCA of Greater Sagan, Minnesota 55122-1897 44Wr 1 Paul RS: Southwest YMCA • . Opperman Drive and Delaware Trail • Sagan, Minnesota General Office . 194 Erb St Fast Dear Mr. Runkle: & N55101-1999 The YMCA has applied for a permit to construct the footing and 612.292.4100 foundations for our new Southwest YMCA facility located at > FAX Opperman Drive and Delaware Trail in Sagan. It is the intent of E the YMCA to start and complete this work yet this fall. The G3aitmaaKVO documents for the full building permit will be submitted in 1993. bhaLTema It is our understanding that Sagan has revised its policy over the 0 past several years to require payment of the Metropolitan Waste • Water Commission Sewer Availability charge, Sagan Sewer Availability charge, Sagan Water Treatment fee, Kagan Road Unit fee, and Kagan Trail Dedication fee at the time a Footing and Foundation Permit is issued ,rather than at the time the full BUILDING building permit is issued. The cost of these fees on this project l vl c�t'77T�S is considerable. They approach the value of the footing and foundation work itself. It would be a considerable benefit to the YMCA to pay for these fees at the time the full building permit is issued and not at the time the footing and foundation permit is issued. We, therefore, request that the payment of the Metropolitan Waste Water Commission Sewer Availability charge, Sagan Sewer Availability charge, Kagan Water Treatment fee, Sagan Road Unit fee, and Sagan Trail Dedication fee be deferred until the time the full building permit is issued. . If it is necessary for this request to be presented to the City Council, we request that it be presented at the November 17 Council meeting. We will be appearing before the Council that evening for the matters on this site. • Thank you for your consideration in this matter. 1 � R. Shannon Vice President/Facility Management Ile YMCA is s C ,iain-values bred orpaisstioe dist builds self- - =teem,mutual tespat and a saoeber community for all thrott*b ,Miry IONSmals that mine families,develop youth.eebmna halt,ad prosote i c adumi and global aedeRtaodiaj. r 0 November 10, 1992 44s k , Mr. Kenneth Vraa j Director of Parks • YMCA of Greater - City of Eagan .406a6nt Paul - = 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, Minnesota 55122 RE: YMCA Cash Trailway Dedication • General Office 194 6th St.Fast Dear Mr. Vraa: St.Paul,MN 55101.1999 This letter follows up on our meeting of October 27, 1992. As you 612-292-4100 recall, the purpose of the meeting was to discuss the calculation FAX 612-292-4148 of the cash trailway dedication fee for Lot 1, Block 1, YMCA 1st GtxdonE Addition. As stated at Our meeting, the YMCA was under the CbainnaN('VD impression that the trailway dedication fee would be calculated only on the acreage not subject to easements granted in favor of ken Tnver the public. That is, the area which is encumbered with pending President/CEO and conservation easements would not be included in the calculation. However, the fee stated in the development contract does not reflect this adjustment. The basis for the YMCA's understanding is two-fold. First, at the BUILDING Advisory Parks Commission meeting on June 4, 1992, when asked what FUTURES the parks and trailway fees were, I responded that the staff FUTURES C/ report identified them as approximately $48,000 and $17,500 respectively. However, it was also mentioned and, in our opinion acknowledged by City staff, that the above figures did not reflect a reduction for the 12.7 acre pending and conservation easements. Second, it is our understanding that the area in question could have been permanently dedicated as open space and/or platted as an outlet, which would have effectively removed the area from the fee calculation. In addition, the YMCA would have still been able to utilize the pending and conservation areas as open space to satisfy the plat density requirements of 35 percent. Finally, while the second option was not pursued, primarily because the YMCA was never informed of the necessity to do so and because the YMCA thought the trailway fees would be calculated only on the area exclusive of the pending and conservation easements, I would like to point out that a building which is planned for the remaining 8.35 acres does of require the use of the easement areas to satisfy the plat density requirements. In fact, the 45,000 square foot building which is proposed for the • 8.35 acre site will result in a plat density of only 12.4 percent - far below the 35 percent allowed. The YMCA is a Christian-values based organization that builds self- INT esteem,mutual respect and a stronger community for all through quality programs that enrich families,develop youth,enhance health,and promote immature and global uoderstandiag. • Based on the foregoing, the YMCA requests that the City of Eagan make an exception to its current policy concerning the calculation of the cash trailway dedication fees and calculate the fees only on the 8.35 acres which are not encumbered by the pending and conservation easements. This reduction will result in a savings of about $10,800 to the YMCA, and will benefit both the YMCA and the City by allowing us to use this money for construction of the new facility. If possible, we would like to bring this matter before the City Council on November 17, 1992. If you have any questions, please call. Si erely, J R. Shannon Vice President/Facility Management JRS/sjj c: Thomas Hedges Harry E. Gallaher George Spevacek • MINUTES OBlii::.04.0AtiMEE:F0 OF THE Figii0ectreCdokeig:::: 'T:iigan, Minnesota •••••••• NOgeniber 21, 190;:i::* A special City Council meeting was schtidille0.4011:45 am. Saturday, November 21, 1992 at the Eagan Municipal Center building for the purpose of conducting a field trip to tour the Centennial Ice Arena in Circle Pines. Those in attendance were Mayor Egan and Councimembers Awada and Wachter. Absent were City Councilmembers McCrea and Pawlenty. Also present were City Councilmember Elect Shawn Hunter, Assistant to the City Administrator/Acting Community Development Director Hohenstein, Director of Parks&Recreation Vraa and City Adminial*M0g01:;:gOtisteMed citizens in attendance included Alan Menning and John Freeman, who had expresset frnereet In attending the field trip. CENTENNIAJ,ICE ARENA Director of Parks & Recreation Vraalgt*Ii.fied.v......004 Peake, Manager of the Centennial Ice Arena facility, to the City Council and proceidiiii4iih and a tour of the facility. He stated that originally it was hoped a facility could be build for $1.2 million. Through fundraisers, School District participation, volunteerism and a contribution from the Hockey Association, the total project cost at completion was$2.1 million. Mr. Peake stated that the bond issue amount is$812,000. Other financing of the arena facility included a donation in the amount of$300,000 from the Blaine hockey group, $200,000 from Anoka County,$350,000 from the School District capital expenditures fund,$100,000 in donations and approximately $25,000 in interest eaming0::;:;:.:11e:prther stated that architectural fees in the amount of approximately $100,000 were also donatect6iKtoo;:opm::clesigning the new school facilities. Mr. Peake continued to reference the importance of volunteerieifiiii4:06titributed to the project through fundraising and construction. He also stated that there wers*:sti number Of.ffarA in the building and that lack of planning and foresight was the reason with the concessio*dpc***Iiiiiid office area as examples of errors. Mr. Peake stated an experienced architect woyict:NiViii.;be4effielpful. He went on to say that the donations of labor helped to construct the building, bu tlt the building is up, help is hard to obtain even though there is still much to do. Following a one hour tour of the facility, which included a brief meeting with the Superintendent of Schools, Dr. John McCiullen, the Eagan delegation returned to the Eagan Municipal Center building. City staff was directed to continue preliminary work pn.Opprcripct.c.og,financing plan and development of a time line for future consideration by the City Ciiiiiiia.::::.*:::.6000010:jeturning from Circle Pines to the City of Eagan included financing options, locatioii'afffieleejalifiiiidi suggestion that a set of the Centennial Ice Arena plans be secured for additional review ansOOnsidergetn. OTHER OtASINESO::::::: • There being no further business, the meeting was adjouined at approximately 2:15 p.m. TLH Date City Clerk MINUTES OF*0.00.4410.i.10.0 OF THE EAGAN'ertY igan, Minnesota iimber 5, 199Ci:.:. A special meeting of the Eagan City Cotjjn Thursday, November 5, 1992 at 5:00 p.m. at the Eagan Municipal Center. Mayor Egan and all Councilmembers were present. Also present were City Administrator Hedges, members of the staff and representatives of the Eagan Hockey Association. 1993-1997 CAPITAL. 4pROVEMENTB PROGRAM City Administrator Hedges presen4iiiiii'l:****br 14:iipapital improvements program as it has been developed by staff and refined by Council. H&thón introdited Brad Schmidt of the Eagan Hockey Association relative to the ice arena item in the CIP. Schmidt.thanked the City Council for its openness to discuss alternative approaches to Ice arena fungirt:Apd went over a proposal developed by the Hockey Association in that regard. He stated that tiiii::000tal:110:40rivo alternatives;one would be to fund an ice arena together with ball and soccer fléldäñd thitifiaVivould be to fund an ice arena only. He indicated that the Hockey Association wished to combine several funding sources including$1.3 million from the City's community investment fund,a$200,000 contribution from the Eagan Hockey Association over 20 years, $50,000 in sweat equity from the Hockey Association and $100,000 from an ice arena hourly surcharge for ten years. He stated that would leave a gap of$650,000 to$1,400,000 to fund the respective proposals. He stated that the Hockey Associatiiiiiiiibulatpfpposs.to meet debt service on these bonds through the contribution noted above, and increased fee:.qn adirlet!radiational teams and two impact fees, one on account transfers for City utilities and another on new building:p0iits. Together,these fees would generate sufficient funds to pay the debt service on the eii:Opo,00:*littiale. Councilmember Wachter IndicateritAiiiii alternatIve funding mechanism for the debt service or financing gap could be the use of pull tab proceeds dedicated to a recreational facility. Councilmember Pawlenty asked if all of the interest from the community investment fund was currently being used. Finance Director VanOverbeke indicated that the dollar amounts listed in the CIP consisted of 90% of the proceeds of the community investment fund with 10% being returned to principal each year. Pawlenty also agreed with Wachter that the City should define th9:#poun4pIpcmised.by pull tabs within the City and investigate how much revenue pull tabs could generaf:ktpif:**:1400;WObOncfimember McCrea stated that the City should be careful about how much of the pull tab revenue could be used since many positive community ' activities are also supported by pull tabs, including:* Com*Oity Action Council, the B. Robert Lewis House, the Crime Prevention Fund and other worth .iiiiiiuses. Councilmember Awada stated that she supports the usitrf the$1.3 million City allocation for an ice arena project. She stated that she disagrees with the fee increases proposed by the Hockey Association because they have no direct relationship to the use for which they are intended and therefore could be considered to be additional taxes. She asked for further information relative to research which had been prepared by the Community Development Department relativeWthe park dedication fee and its use. City Administrator Hedges indicated that he had not had an opport0:416/to review the Community Development memorandum in that regard and that additional analysis would:bit performed on its findings. . ••••••••••••• •••• •.....•••.....•••......•••... Mayor Egan commented on variodiiiii0:***VticiOncluding the impact fees and the potential for pull tab revenue and asked that the staff coordinate additioNd research. Mr. Schmidt asked that the Council consider the possibly that interest rates would increase in the near future and stated the Hockey Association's hope that the City would move quickly to take advantage of the low interest rates. Council then discussed the specific allocations within the proposal. A question was raised as to whether the fees proposed would raise the revenues projected. Community Development Page 2/EAGAN SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL November 5, 1992 • Director Runkle responded that the City iii4iiinues to see a reititiVely high level of growth and that any projections based on 1992 numbers would-probably be high a.tp:ripared to building levels over 20 years. There was particular discussion concerninif*a:Additional110:.recreation facility fee for each building permit Councilmember Awada stated that she was not comfortable in raising taxes or fees for such a facility given the two defeated referendums proposed by the City in the past. She suggested that the$1.3 million City allocation would be a significant base upon which to develop additional financing. She stated that the Hockey Association should pursue private stgpr..Ayppon....a larg,portion of the remainder and suggested that pull tab revenue could be used to fuO4i*::iiiiig......:$4:.**44 that any surcharge on use should be earmarked toward future facilities, such as a sioeinitooer•i4 Ice Or a community center. Mayor Egan asked that staff review the budcp4;:and discw the possible use of revenue bonds with the City's fiscal consultant to determine whether.p10.1pn be.lgitAilly utilized. He also strongly urged that the Hockey Association explore additional*iiii*ii giVikcji:::::$0imidt stated that the Hockey Association had been extremely unsuccessful in getting':eiiiiiiirate coritfThu ions in the past and that only one Eagan firm had volunteered in that regard. He reiterated the Hockey Association's request for an impact fee on the building permit. Councilmember Pawlenty agreed with Councilmember Awada's comments, but shared the Hockey Association's concern that corporate dollars.:might not be as easy to raise until the project was certain to be developed. Councilmember McCrea that the use of community investment fund would be supported by all Councilmembers and that the concept of revenue bonds should be investigated. She stated that the Hockey Association should pursue pull and asked staff to develop a report on the annual pull tab proceeds in the City. She OggesteclAt:4000f.baps the City could require a percentage of pull tab revenues be dedicated to this purpo*.•:***iiiii::leitiis essential for the Council to understand the feasibility and legality of all of the Items proposed and asked that it be placed on a future agenda for • further consideration. ••••••••••- Councilmember Pawlenty stated that Eagan could not be a major city without an ice arena. He stated that the City already subsidizes other sports activities and operations and that an ice arena is an obvious next step. He also supported the use of pull tabs and private sector support for such a facility. Mayor Egan thanked the HockeyMiWki0.6.f.ikilPl:,:pmantation and indicated that staff would be doing additional analysis of the proposal and its finanOigiliirhents. He then asked staff to ensure that the new City Councilmembers were invited to all future ijiSetings, 4irkshops and tours so that they could be familiar with these issues as they transitioned into 4*new ro*. • Mayor Egan stated that it would be necessary for staff iiiirovide additional information on the cost of a basic,aesthetically acceptable ice arena,that a basic site plan and operating budget be prepared,that the financing options be returned to the City Council and that it be placed on a formal agenda at some point In the future for public input relative to this concept. It was also suggested that a tour of the Circle Pines/ Centennial Ice Arena be scheduled for November 21 at noon for.g.Councilmembers,new Councilmembers, staff and interested parties. There being no other business,tWiptiOtiVVI9rte0:#6:30 p.m. JDH • ::::•:•::: • Date City Clerk