The URL can be used to link to this page

12/08/1992 - City Council Special (2) SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING TUESDAY DECEMBER 8, 1992 5:00 P.K. MARY, MOTHER OF THE CHURCH 3333 CLIFF ROAD, BURNSVILLE I. ROLL CALL & AGENDA ADOPTION II. DRAFT 1993 - 1997 C.I.P. BUDGET III. PUBLIC HEARING FOR CEDAR GROVE NO. 3 4, 5, 6, AND 9, STREET & UTILITY RECONSTRUCTION FOR PROJECT NO. 617R IV. OTHER BUSINESS V. ADJOURNMENT MEMO TO: HONORABLE MAYOR & CITY COUNCILMEMBERS FROM: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES DATE: DECEMBER 4, 1992 SUBJECT: SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING/DECEMBER 8, 1992 A special City Council meeting is scheduled for 5:00 p.m., Tuesday, December 8, at Mary, Mother of Church. Food will be catered from the Cherokee Sirloin Room (formerly Durnings). Please contact Karen for your choice of a salad, grilled chicken sandwich or hamburger. Beginning at 7:00 p.m. the public hearing for the Cedar Grove street and utility reconstruction will commence. As a reminder to the Public Works Committee, a meeting is scheduled for Monday, December 7, at 7:30 a.m. at Bakers Square restaurant to discuss appraisals and the assessment procedure for the street and utility reconstruction for Project 617R. In the attached informative memo, there is an invitation to the City Council to attend an informal celebration for a new MVTA bus route that begins this Monday morning at Yankee Doodle and Pilot Knob Road Park & Ride site. Any Councilmembers who wish to attend can be present at approximately 7:00 for a brief acknowledgement. Also, the Personnel Committee is scheduled to meet at Mary, Mother of the Church, at approximately 3:00 p.m. for the purpose of reviewing the personnel policy and any other related personnel items that may be appropriate for City Council consideration at the December 15 meeting. Non-collective bargaining, compensation and health insurance for 1993 will be addressed by the Committee. City Administrator TLH/kf ti I PROJECT 617R CEDAR GROVE STREET REHABILITATION On December 8, a Special City Council meeting will be held to hold the public hearing associated with the above-referenced proposed improvement. Approximately 720 properties will be affected by this improvement. On November 16, an informational neighborhood meeting was held to review the proposed improvements with interested property owners and to answer any questions or concerns they may have. Enclosed on pages .3 through is a copy of a summary of that neighborhood meeting, and on pages through is a response received from the residents on the Serpentine Drive cul-de-sac expressing a desire to keep the existing configuration of that cul-de-sac. Also enclosed on pages a.5 through 3 is a copy of the feasibility report discussing the proposed improvements to the Cedar Grove 3rd, 4th, 5th, 6th and 9th Additions. During the ublic hearing, the Director of Public Works will provide historical and introductory comments pertaining to this project. Mark Hanson, the consulting engineer retained for this project, will provide a generalized description of the project through the use of slides and overheads followed by a discussion pertaining to the special assessment financing on the project. It is anticipated that the introductory comments and presentation will last approximately 30-35 minutes. In addition to considering the improvement as a whole, the City Council should take specific action regarding the following items: 1. Consideration of streetlight installation. 2. Elimination vs. restor ,tion of the Nicols frontage road. 3. Modify various street widths as shown on Figures A, B and C enclosed on pages ' through g‘, . Maintaining existing street widths would result in a savings of approximately $14,500 (0.4%). This would not have any significant effect to the estimated special assessments. 4. Specifically identify the amount of special assessments if different from that contained in the feasibility report. Additional information regarding the pre-improvement appraisals will be forwarded to the City Council under separate cover with the Administrative Packet. The facilities at Mary, Mother of the Church are available until 10:00 p.m. Therefore, the public hearing should be concluded no later than 9:30 to allow adequate time to straighten up the facility and vacate it by 10:00 p.m. when the security system is set. Due to the difficulty in locating and scheduling adequately sized facilities for this size of public hearing, it would be beneficial if the public hearing process could be completed with action taken at this meeting. / • All notices have been published in the legal newspaper and sent to all affected property owners informing them of this special public hearing. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To close the public hearing and approve/deny Project 617R (Cedar Grove 3, 4, 5, 6 & 9 Additions - Street Rehabilitation) as presented or modified and, if approved, authorize the preparation of detailed plans and specifications. MEMO TO: THOMAS A. COLBERT, DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS FROM: MICHAEL P. FOERTSCH, ASSISTANT CITY ENGINEER DATE: DECEMBER 3, 1992 SUBJECT: PROJECT #617R, NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING CEDAR GROVE #3,4,5,6, AND 9 STREET AND UTILITY RECONSTRUCTION An informational neighborhood meeting was held in the Mary Center of the Mary, Mother of the Church in Burnsville on November 16, 1992 beginning at 6:30 p.m. The purpose of the meeting was to provide the residents of the above-referenced Cedar Grove Additions with information regarding the upcoming improvements planned for their subdivisions. The following members of City staff were in attendance at the meeting: Tom Colbert, Mike Foertsch, Stan Lexvold, John Wingard, Ed Kirscht and Arnie Erhart. The following representatives from Bonestroo, Rosene, Anderlik & Associates (BRAA) were also present: Mark Hanson, Craig Larson and John Gorder. Attached are the sign up sheets listing the residents who were in attendance at the meeting. Also included is a site map showing the location of the attendees within the Cedar Grove Additions. Tom Colbert opened the meeting by welcoming the residents and introducing members of City staff as well as the representatives from Bonestroo, Rosene, Anderlik & Assoc. After the introductions, Tom provided the residents with a summary of items which staff and the consultants intended to cover as a part of the meeting. Tom explained the purpose of the meeting was to provide information to the residents and create an informal setting in which residents could ask their individual questions concerning the proposed improvements. Tom explained the history of Eagan's growth, the approximate age of the streets and utilities within the Cedar Grove Addition's as well as the methodology used to determine and develop the City's current 5 Year Capital Improvement Program. The Cedar Grove Addition reconstructions are one of the first major residential street tr eet reconstruction programs which the City has proposed. Tom provided a history of the planned reconstructions for the Cedar Grove Additions. In the early 1980's Cedar Groves #1 and #2 were upgraded in a similar manner proposed for Cedar Grove #3,#4,#5,#6 and #9. The Cedar Grove #3 and #5 area was proposed in 1984 and was subsequently turned down by the City Council at that time. The City utilizes an extensive and detailed street rating analysis in determining the order and to what extent streets are proposed to be upgraded or reconstructed within the City. Approximately 2-1/2 years ago the City implemented a Pavement Management Program which analyzes every square yard of existing street surface within the City. All the streets within the City were rated on a scale of 1 - 100. This rating on a scale of 1-100 is called a PCI rating or a Pavement Condition Index rating. This rating system was utilized in developing the City's current Capital Improvement Program. 1 3 At this point in the presentation, Tom briefly explained the Capital Improvement Program as a whole and the financing methodologies which the City has available for the reconstruction of streets and utilities within existing neighborhoods. Mark Hanson from BRAA prepared an "Executive Summary" for the street and utility reconstruction for the Cedar Grove Additions as well as a presentation of the details presented in the "Executive Summary". The "Executive Summary" which was provided to the residents in attendance at the meeting and is attached as a part of this summary. Mark explained in detail the extent of the improvements as well as providing a slide presentation showing the following items: • Existing condition of the streets within the Cedar Grove Additions • Pavement life cycle graph • Existing catch basin condition within the reconstruction project • Slide showing actual extent of reconstruction of a typical catch basin and a lead • Existing service road along Nicols Road • Proposed reconstruction of the service road along Nicols Road • Typical driveway reconstruction • Typical concrete curb and gutter installation and bituminous street surfacing • Typical street patching where a portion of the existing roadway surfacing was in good enough condition to utilize • Typical extent of concrete curb and gutter repair • A number of slides showing reconstructed streets in Cedar Groves #1 and #2 a well as South Oaks Addition and Clearview Addition The existing street section within the Cedar Grove Additions is basically a 36' wide bituminous surface with a rolled bituminous curb. The proposed newly reconstructed street widths within the Cedar Grove Additions would comply with the City's current City Code requirements for street widths. The only two streets within the Cedar Grove Additions which are proposed to remain 36' wide would be Carnelian Lane and Turquoise Trail. Carnelian Lane and Turquoise Trail are both designated as neighborhood collector streets in the Transportation Plan Element of the City's Comprehensive Guide Plan. The remaining streets are proposed to be reduced to either 28 or 32 foot wide as identified in Subdivision 4, Section 13.3 of the City Code. In Cedar Grove Additions #6 and #9 the street widths would remain the same because they have existing concrete curb and gutter. The extent of the street reconstruction within Cedar Grove #6 and #9 would be limited to between the existing concrete curbs as well as replacing the sections of concrete curb and gutter which no longer function. The extent of the storm sewer improvements proposed is that which is required to provide a minimum level of service to the reconstructed areas. Also included with the street and utility reconstruction would be the installation of residential streetlights in accordance with current City policy. The installation of the streetlights would be performed by the respective electric utility (Dakota Electric or Northern States Power) and owned and maintained by the utility. 2 1/7 4 Mark concluded his presentation by explaining the financing mechanisms currently available to the City for improvements such as identified for the Cedar Grove Additions. Pages 3 and 4 of the "Executive Summary" identify the assessments which are proposed to be levied against the benefitted properties in accordance with the City's current Special Assessment Policy for street reconstruction. Applying current City Special Assessment Policy to the proposed reconstruction, results in the City, through its various enterprise and Park funds being responsible for approximately 31% of the total project costs. The current Special Assessment Policy identifies that approximately 69% of the improvement would be financed through the levying of special assessments. Page 4 of the "Executive Summary" identifies the proposed project schedule. At the conclusion of Mark's presentation, Tom Colbert explained various options which exist to the residents. Tom explained the extent of the reconstruction as proposed is in accordance with current City Code, policies, and standards and that the City Council has the option to make minor changes or modifications to current City policy as they see fit. The staff's responsibility in cases such as this is to identify all possible options to the City Council so the City Council can make an informed decision in the best interests of the City as a whole. At the end of the presentations by the City, the neighborhood meeting was opened to questions from the residents. The residents questions basically centered around the following categories: STREET WIDTHS/PAVEMENT STRENGTH/FRONTAGE ROAD ELIMINATION In general, the residents in attendance seemed to be concerned with the proposed reduction in the existing street widths. Even though staff explained to the residents that the proposed street widths were in accordance with current City Code, it seemed as though there were basically opposed to any reduction in the existing street widths. The residents that requested that street widths not be reduced, wanted to know the extra cost for a wider street. City staff responded by agreeing to do a cost estimate of constructing the new streets at 36' wide. This was especially true for those residents who live along Carnelian Lane and Turquoise Trail. The residents along these two streets have the q 9 perception that traffic has significantly increased over the past as well as the concern with the speed at which the motorists are travelling on the existing roadway. Some residents requested that speed bumps be added to the streets to slow the traffic. • Staff presented two options for the residents consideration with respect to the existing frontage road along Nicols Road between Shale Lane and Living Word Lutheran Church. The general consensus of the residents at the meeting was to leave the existing frontage road in place and to upgrade it with concrete curb and gutter and storm sewer. The residents were concerned with elimination of the frontage road and extending the • driveways out to Nicols Road as was done along Nicols Road north of Diffley. The residents felt that Nicols Road is a dangerous road to back out onto. With the proposed 3 �/ I elimination of the frontage road and the extension of the driveways, the bituminous trailway would need to be extended northerly from Shale Lane. Without the elimination of the frontage road the trailway corridor can use the frontage road versus constructing a trailway adjacent and parallel to the frontage road and Nicols Road. DRIVEWAYS/BOULEVARD RESTORATION With respect to driveway restoration, the residents were questioning the extent of their driveway which would be reconstructed as a part of the street improvement. The only portion of the driveway which would be reconstructed would be that portion which is necessary to provide the required drainage or grade to match the new street grade. The driveways will be replaced with a like kind of material as they currently exist. The residents asked if they could have their total driveway reconstructed as a part of the project if they desired. Staff responded by saying that the property owners would have the option of working out a deal with the City's contractor, but the City would not get involved with reconstruction of driveways outside of the public right-of-way. The City would provide the property owner with the name, address and phone number of the contractor and it would be the responsibility of the property owner to work out some type of an arrangement with the contractor. With respect to boulevard restoration, the restoration is limited to that which is required to install curb and gutter adjacent to the roadway. Typically this boulevard restoration would be limited to two or three feet behind the curb. In the areas of Cedar Grove #6 and #9 where curb and gutter reconstruction is very limited, the boulevard restoration would be very limited also. STORM SEWER Questions by the residents relating to storm sewer were fairly limited in scope. The basic -- information the residents wanted was how much storm sewer was to be installed and why the existing storm sewer was being replaced to the extent that it was being replaced. In response to these concerns, staff explained there were some intersections within the Ceder Groves which currently did not have adequate drainage. This inadequate drainage is evidenced by the fact that the roadway condition in these intersections has severely deteriorated. The storm sewer improvements recommended are designed to improve intersection drainage and provide greater inlet capacity into the existing storm sewer system. The storm sewer extensions proposed as a part of this project are financed 100% by the City's Enterprise Funds. STREETLIGHTS A clear majority of the residents present at the neighborhood meeting were in favor of the installation of streetlights as a part of the street reconstruction. The total cost of the streetlight improvements were identified as being 100%assessed on a per lot basis. The 4 • cost of the streetlight installation was a part of the overall improvement assessment and the energy cost for the streetlights is included on the resident's quarterly utility bill. Currently streetlight energy costs are billed at approximately $2.85/quarter for residential areas. SIDEWALKS/TRAILWAYS/PARK IMPROVEMENTS Questions relating to sidewalk or trailway installation were basically initiated due to the fact that current City standards for most of the streets in the Cedar Grove area would be a reduction in street width than what currently exists. The residents generally expressed concern with the reduction due to the fact that the City does not have a policy which • provides for sidewalks or trailways within residential areas. The residents felt that the existing street width of 36' wide would provide an additional level of comfort" for pedestrian as well as bicycle traffic along the existing roadways. The homeowners adjacent to the Woodhaven Park area expressed concern with any type of a street width reduction due to the fact that park users typically park on both sides of the roadway adjacent to the park. They asked if there were any provisions for additional parking within or adjacent to the park property. In a related matter, residents adjacent to Peridot Path Park expressed concern with the existing condition of the park as well as additional parking provisions. City staff present at the neighborhood meeting have relayed the concerns to the Parks Department. CONSTRUCTION PHASING/SCHEDULE The preliminary schedule for the improvements is for construction to begin in the Spring of 1993 as soon as the contractor can begin his work and to be completed in the Fall of 1993. Given this construction schedule and the scope of the improvement, the residents were concerned about the project being completed in one construction season. The primary concern in existing residential areas from the residents perspective is access to their driveways and the access for emergency vehicles. Typically with construction in existing residential areas, the plans and specifications for the improvement require the contractor to maintain emergency vehicle access at all times during the construction. The residents will be temporarily inconvenienced depending on the extent and type of improvement which is in progress directly adjacent to their property. There will be periods of time when the residents will not be able to use their existing driveways due to the installation of concrete curb and gutter, driveway restoration, or when utility construction is progressing adjacent to their properties. When concrete curb and gutter is placed, the residents will be allowed to park on the opposite side of the street until the concrete has cured. 5 ASSESSMENTS/FINANCING The major concern which is typical of improvements which affect individual property owners is the financing mechanism which the City is proposing. In this case, the current Special Assessment Policy identifies methodologies in which a proposed assessment amount is calculated on a per lot basis for each individual property owner. In using these methodologies as outlined in the current Special Assessment Policy, the bottom line cost to the residents amounted to approximately 69% of the total improvement costs. Two different assessment rates were developed. A rate was developed for Cedar Grove #3, #4 and #5 which includes the cost of installation of concrete curb and gutter. Cedar Groves #6 and #9 have existing curb and gutter and the improvement cost was less. One resident stated they had called the Dakota County Assessor's office and asked them if a street reconstruction improvement in their area would raise the taxable valuation of their property. According to the resident, the County Assessor's office responded by saying that the taxable assessed valuation is based on whether or not the property has improved street access. According to the County Assessor's office, the upgrade of an existing improved street does not increase the taxable assessed valuation of the property. This information from the County Assessor's Office created some concern with the residents. The perception of not having an increase in taxable assessed valuation of their property would indicate that a street improvement would not be a benefit to their property. The City staff explained the appraisal process which the City had initiated to determine the special benefit amount which the properties would receive as a result of the proposed improvements. The City has hired certified real estate appraisers which will be reviewing 30 to 40 properties within the Cedar Grove area. The 32 plus homes which are being reviewed by the appraisers on behalf of the City represent about 5% of the total properties involved in the reconstruction project. The residents were informed that this value determination is planned to be available for the December 8, 1992 public hearing before the City Council. Staff again informed the residents that the proposed assessment amount determination was based on current City Special Assessment Policy and the support documentation as determined by a certified real estate appraiser was not available at the time of the neighborhood meeting. The nei borhood meeting adjourned at approximately 9:15 p.m. �� Mich el P. Foertsch Attachments MPF/jf 6 G 'J CEDAR GROVE NO. 3, 4, 5, 6 AND 9 NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING • PROJECT NO. 6178 NOVEMBER 16, 1992 NAME ADDRESS 1. \ i O 1/45A//t/A- Q�� £! PP i? 2. co.t3 cr-E(vi ''& ?.0 AS cuf 3 I wt q sviAu ,3 9IV // e a/se �►r c�� 4. $feve (I`1u reits �/��p;et tr/ ,e 5. IjA^ /`1 Ifni- II 3 6 7 ON/ /91" 6. S-/1,'00'2_/ -(sv0- 3q34 / Tct, 7. as ( ' (D6Lo q r 8. r• , ao � Cor- Lam, 9. c i / /, , S -. 4w• AL- 10. • a.3 a (3 f 0 f Oleos inck 8yY7 Geer G Pi)) 12. ti. ( 3 7 ' rt3-erg / Rd /gag di 13. Ld�z VAALQ. 14. 4 ' ,44 - . sgg_g ed_et■set ,,0 -V� a!I 15. 16. Batteful_rs444 2/40 if 7 /3 on se./,, re/t. 17. Davl CI ectl 3953 c,41,711‘0r 18. V 1-76c) Gc'c c 19. tek A b * `g4 Tw AS- 20. .36V Cpppc 9 CEDAR GROVE NO. 3, 4, 5, 6AND9 NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING PROJECT NO. 617R NOVEMBER 16, 1992 NAME ADDRESS 1. 541.% ) D 1.---)u( Vfk)&li 393afi i)2& OtE1" 2. A _ . �. i, ...L. _�.►, ( Or 3. Able: � a .! ' . -....., - v`✓a nl 7 a e, t, ' Arc,/ i 4. (_ �., V"� i yo 53 /ea 5. /..4a---,d 0/'( ,,f�) 3 907 /1-t/44 77- 4..'1 6. -- , 39 7 .decV/ ' 7. ic,e, y ea ,2),/c / ' I I 0 8. 7-17"iv /47(Wc - 35.9i QeckL kb 9. 6ki 5c -fair f o c_ h .24YQ ,Tate Lii 1o. av c{ ,1%r1oGk 11. A4<0 ,11-2-- a i 33 S i-I',4 LG ,,j 12. /,- ._ ' 4...Liz 13. -1 .d ■ i ----- cl_ a fi J 7/3 'M�c ua3c Tf. 14. a -2 igt.1 cQOS/ I4L 15. C,Let/t,-- :V (/ • .__ . .2.d/7.3 ,Vet_"_ _. 16. /r _) n/---7/ te _ • I, .1 39s9 / 17. .-. . 18 1 !77/ A S4� ,- 18. p o?fl7Y g lee- Q ..._,,.�- 19. :vi _ 1 (393 Li 6cil., ,Q / 20. , �/ .11v' t_.7 / / ret-eZ 1 CEVAR GROVE NO. 3, 4, 5, 6 AND 9 tIEIGIIBORHOOD MEETING PROJECT NO. 617R NOVEMBER 16, 1992 NAME ADDRESS 1. g%sc 2. iiiibfActi. 17c 1` L_'C CAP 042/op.ce 3. Tc4'f s-.C(!` , Ct pis S%al e- LA/ 4. ..1,04. .°. u! a S /-13 Z?) /6 okw..et..b itAR . 5. - n t� - u 3R £iot.A it C 6. 4--9 Ge �h 1 7. ANN if 8. /� � as • 4.,,frst4140 9. 077 ‘ CC,Mire -r 10. ,� 11. � ,. ! ioio �Q. 12. ilikijus 10 g ivt 'Ont br. 13. • i''' - 43$7 6)4' 6' PT. 14. 1, TG� .0 9/44 15. ••..41-CO (C.:270r\-tAt441-- t>"Cs& s h 16. gehArt ,F.iffed•ieddy 208 X de Zoe e 17. nh ,je.4944 4;,rte.-=- ,A 0 WoOetteeert4- 18. /itiY11323 fi1 YX 19. ' Z14 d 1Z..rk_L_t a->sQ rrti4' 1 20. 1115(c.lotiect. 1'1 (AL t, 17 o I k Ltot /( • , 5. CEDAR GROVE NO. 3, 4, 5, 6 AND 9 NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING PROJECT NO. 617R NOVEMBER 16, 1992 NAME ADDRESS 1. ` c 1 JKern t, 7 ( Seiovr_w= WI 2. J411115 $$- 1't-- /$S G.L D T 4 4"- 3. GtQ,'1 Pc 1,6 Ad) n L [ /0j7 7eQcist / !? , 4. .t -1-- /t-,t/ i,= u R y a/ca. cf_i) u A_a, -1-z- 1-4-,vE 5. at A eZ 00 (1vu (h. (--411C- , 6. ■ / .4..1/ C_i/A-D ti 37 3 ) - 7. ..�,kt c€1 c= � /60 ThiC aca -7�4?C- . 8. 0,(1,(i-e 1- Inier 383 `/ Cg lc; kte Or, 9. .)i 7C c�r�.t-- �D o �-..-� 10. v 1)) C ! 76, g- EVc--/c//r t/ 0 11- d e(._36,uz. (Abel/ 3c10-1 C4!)rn,,r or. 12. F(tAN- F= M. cve(ei /?7 8 7J2& of s /2/1ic._ 13. al.,;6 Lu e_ X_r.; v R o&C)5I C.cppe c L-N . 14. 11/1&�2'( 14v k'r<<�col4A) ZooG ChEN _J ll-41 L.N 15. `-o -41 M-- v o sc■t, aG o d{ sf 2 LQ L . 16. B rt?A c; nil l r5 3`I7$ IM'ca 1 r. G74t �k L 17. ei `-Wib kinAiiiit I—Cn, 18. '-(7t.f...e. -Ivj 91 / o f" err/U.7 ,-,e 19. !I int CIALect / 02066 S Lze ' e i ; 20. ► k ( vi C F 4-33—i) LePterz._ .Pd,=1- 7- /2- , CEDAR GROVE NO. 3, 4, 5, 6 AND 9 NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING . PROJECT NO. 617R NOVEMBER 16, 1992 NAME ADDRESS . 1. To iv. Wiy4,of.N. G I+y o FF Fal90.r■ 2. L1ca:i* A a 4-/ 0M-23 Q L'c/-.7'r Li 3. TX(c*4A. - -I- 1717 $ ryeu,JZt.e. 04_- 4. /)OV'ALD �l l/0'lt) P `/° 2S Dow ofti.P 4/77--, ,,94,,y, 7 6. _ fr ■ 41' ..r----- .� diCC- 7. all_ Z.o111 St,w\e_ Lam..,,e r 8. Ern, 5T/7C�ylL5 /,..... 7 (1 A-c G !ia /1 iQ 9. , L r .. -R✓ ..,5_./.4/0 Li 11-D s PJ 10. 3...-4.4"./1 4.,.. /7 6 Z S Q./' h 7`41 e OK v 11. , ,-47/.‘4,e4 C.._ -1 72:c e,,,, /?re? ra-reibpf:r-e_ 721 12. /✓e,/ Cie., (<<t,,„. /7(- 7 G• ii'O / h1. 13. -J.rrfo n) X50...k, 1%,' / .-?? 6 Io..TScF I A.✓t 14./(,)/Azt ,t :7_9,-/C:- - tA. . ,0 53(9--it 0-15 ad*-'/E-• 15. SLIZELL:if_.A_4' .. (135(0 of'j X br 16. Cs9e- \ %Ir 3 W 7 1- 4'6 17. Thc .fil./1lZt c.. 1:04077 i?' .t_.. 18. •1.'.! 7V I M--• ZO't S 19. ti „.-!.(2,(1 g/e7S) te' ! a42..ft-eJ 20. 00/ilt. 4L< ,al.G+t-SL-- PO/V ___, ��I P CEDAR GROVE NO. 3, 4, 5, 6 AND 9 tIEIGHBORIIOOD MEETING PROJECT NO. 617R NOVEMBER 16, 1992 NAME ADDRESS 1. 22 `fGnn , 0 c, ' Ca c 2. � 4 4 /•w��,� SSG /J f a O t.k c i PT- 3. lee"'"'‹ 145-7 `- £ Mb di ,H 4. .c446‘.� 5. g9.57 lar■Cj or ,4 rill 6. . ��.. - -.rr.' — Sri 0 a T Qu i s E Po,,A-- 7. 1Mt^ �!N! 8. F LID lc � TQ 9. a -d/ / .3171/ LD /EAT rc 10. at" / l q sa CG r n,/ih Lan 't 11. APT,, I 53 12. i 21( J i 4- -- TA/ 4, 044 VA , 13. A,- ♦ �� 1• _�,, Y1.1 gtv,.4tt 14. ' av1VZA- /1'1 15. __. f/,.lGE G 16. a- ' - 'iD(vs oe..i vPOLi- J)2 17. 'RAJA k- ?e. \iirscc 39a8- etry 1 +'Q.c,_ 5 18. � „ I • .o � ._ ,ot O 9 L 19. 4 , R. CGu�. I.-�� I t a-Yr 744,1,4,4.4:r -2,,.rtA:12 20. CEDAR GROVE NO. 3, 4, 5, 6 AND 9 NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING PROJECT NO. 617R NOVEMBER 16, 1992 NAME ADDRESS 1.1. &Ad. /7'j 2. 4,e 3. 4CKek fe 4. ' i - /4;K:5C41 ff 5. 6. ,1 A.4 7. • ,t 8. A L. c4-1 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. /44-• g 111PTIVIlitt v IMO' °air b 144 . 11111 IN in I. e,gh. r , O rtit : 4'* 4/4s4J11i u 4111 't 4,41t hi.gal *Air ♦ , ,m4"orq• • RESIDENTS WHO ATTENDED NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING CEDAR GROVE No. 3 son�rsfree EAGAN, miNNtsoTA FIGURE A Andorlibb Arsoelate• CITY PROJECT NO. 8178 lni..rr& Ar.Mltib BM Woe tflOrrey I,. PIMA tttonevetr felts L MLR ROW tavoto Q ,.,,, _..__. 4. I 1 I I 9 MI Ili rig c • 44. '1'$,, IV„ , 14444re Or $ti i' \ </j • V440444Pr itt 4ki 1* * • 44bi& & 4'4. —0 1 alp 4 rw,,,,, t-wly, ■MPINIMNI■ iir .41rdirAT 7 1 -- 111 tit 4;" . _ L I I • Clia*** I -1 i • , cor sirio5M4 OR wire 4 q""■--Z-40.....- ,V161 -, Milk - Opt# N. C\r/z — •mi 11:41,lc s 4pirA 6S e,.... if3vest> . 1111hillibi 117.1 ..---- , 101010 II ,,_. • RESIDENTS wHo ATTENDED NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING CEDAR GROVE No. 4 wee FAGV1. MINNESOTA FIGURE 8 Ammo/atom CITY vrtOJ[cT No. e17n /7 1.91 WON OMPANty Se at POK Whim.% UM r t ,tiA,4, ► 0 ■ 111• r $ 4.4.. 4 lii■ ■ **All i '-. IR MI lima _ d■ r� w A �► � r ■ �riiii1i II i a 4- •'. r IIIN *.' 0 t a r r r mod; el s • - • .0 -- ATM III nr r . i .l. 11111 P ■ 1i r 1 ,3 I., K EN_ App 1 1 IL t.,„,4, 4e► Q • PROPERTY OWNERS ATTENDING . 'NI :-- at, e , NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING CEDAR GROVE No. 5 oon•slree ' '' Ramie AnderIlla EAGAN, MINNESQTA j FIGURE C Assoelates CITY PROJECT No. 817R / ensm..r.&AreAN.•I. $U1 Ire.! Nlrhwy •I KIN 411\ l e\I VMltAR DEC. B, 1992 COW. 40510 It. Pad, Mlnn.. la IIIII . ..ta :, - ------- 1// 1 D DR. . ■ wrrri■ ■ weir■ i ! - , HIV= Wiro- .,..,•.A.-,:,, 0 o- .. sur *stir ♦TO� I. 1. : al -ussv*.smile ` r No , Iimilltilii.o. • st 4I,P. Op. -...14 ,, ,A _J ITIMIIIII Itil4 irl 1110. #4 'Tirilik . ) iiiiiiiigpm RIM , •:,■� 6'�'+ ! ♦r4 $t��a 4 Noe lokile p , to NW 111144L VA at Wilk air, 4,0 earl WelYA* ‘011, win masoNiva- Ism. Ao IF— I, I . vilso, *-4 r MUM II 1111110‘1111 01101101146 14,V,44 r-- P%31011k11 1•141". SIEZeiretnr4' di •Lum E 1 . .., . ir,04171'•A■ _-i ' VIIIIIIIIIIIIIpViiii Eilllifairri 1 :iniik in II ont9 au' NEigt..s#,Iritleillrilk,„, 4' AA _,..)r>_1,41Potos imp t , ' al ti , Faire4VeltriMil. on ilk 1,2 or :dell �`• P Om 1 El III 1Fn '71 • PROPERTY OWNERS ATTENDING NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING CEDAR GROVE No. 0 & 8 son:etroo .. Rosen, EAGAN, MINNESOTA FIGURE 0 Andortilek Aseoolates CITY PROJECT No. 15 17R tnrh+ssnt ArehltsNu K\4V\4g51 V tM C. e. 1002 eOMM. 40610 N. Pt 11 - I �t � hwMON NM 'A3'��WR iTi5�9�Z �� Rhe 33 aBFr 4 city of Qagan Executive Summary Cedar Grove No. 3, 4, 5, 6 and 9 Street and Utility Reconstruction City Project No. 617R November 1992 4 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY CEDAR GROVE NO 3, 4, 5, 6, AND 9 STREET & UTILITY RECONSTRUCTION EAGAN, MINNESOTA - City Project 617R November, 1992 INTRODUCTION: The City of Eagan recently developed and adopted a Capital Improvement Program (CIP) to upgrade its older deteriorated residential streets that have exceeded their original design life. The residential street in Cedar Grove No. 3, 4, 5, 6, and 9 (Project No. 617R) presented on Figure No. 1 are some of the streets that have been identified for consideration in 1993. This preliminary report discusses the proposed improvements, their estimated costs and methods of financing which include special assessments to benefitted property. DISCUSSION: The proposed street improvements are separated into two parts: PART I: Residential Streets in Cedar Grove No. 3, 4, and 5 PART II: Residential Streets in Cedar Grove No. 6 and 9 PART I: Street reconstruction proposed in Cedar Grove No. 3, 4, and 5 include complete removal of all bituminous curb and street surface. New gravel base will be constructed as required in conjunction with a new 3" thick bituminous pavement and concrete curb and gutter. Required driveway and boulevard restoration is also included. The majority of the streets will be constructed approximately 3'- 5' narrower than the existing street widths to conform with present City Standards and other residential subdivisions. Figure No. 10 identifies the street widths and proposed section. Figure No. 11A identifies proposed improvements to the existing cul-de-sacs in Beryl Road and Mica Trail / 49519/exe.sum 1 PART II: The residential streets in Cedar Grove No. 6 and 9 already have concrete curb and gutter. Therefore, only a limited amount of curb will have to be repaired. It is proposed to remove the existing bituminous surface where required and construct a new 3" thick bituminous pavement between the existing concrete curbs. In areas where the existing bituminous surface is adequate, a new 11/2'- 2" thick bituminous pavement will be constructed over the existing bituminous surface. Figure No. 11 identifies the street widths and proposed section. Figure No. 11A identifies proposed improvements to the existing cul- de-sac in Gold Trail and Serpentine Drive. STREET LIGHTS: Street lights are included for the homeowners consideration. Figures No. 12, 13, and 14 identify the proposed street light locations. Figure No. 15 identifies the type of street lights proposed to be constructed at the intersections along Blackhawk Road, Rahn Road, and Nicols Road and along all interior roads in each subdivision. UTILITIES: Storm sewer improvements are proposed in certain areas. All existing storm sewer catch basins and leads are proposed to be reconstructed. In addition, certain repairs are proposed to the existing sanitary sewer and water main system. The utility repairs are primarily confined to the services. COST ESTIMATE: I. Street A. Cedar Grove No. 3, 4, and 5 $2,360,170 B. Cedar Grove No. 6 and 9 541,710 II. Street Lights 296,830 III. Storm Sewer 405,760 IV. Utility Repair 186.200 TOTAL PROJECT COST $3,790,670 49519/exe.sum 2 ASSESSMENTS: Assessments are proposed to be levied against the benefitted property in accordance with the City of Eagan's Current Assessment Policy for Street Reconstruction which is summarized below: Property Type Residential/Duplex All Other Assessed Assessed Bituminous Street Reconstruction 75% 25% 100% 0% New Concrete Curb 100% 0% 100% 0% Repair Existing Concrete Curb 0% 100% 0% 100% Street Lights 100% 0% 100% 0% Storm Sewer Laterals 0% 100% 0% 100% Sanitary Sewer/Water Repair 0% 100% 0% 100% A summary of the cost/lot is listed below: Estimated Cost/Lot Cedar Grove Cedar Grove No. 3, 4, 5 No 6 & 9 Bituminous Street Reconstruct $1,832 $1,826 New Concrete Curb & Gutter 1,739 Previously Pd. Street Lights 396 396 $3,967 $2,222 The homeowner will have the option at the time of the assessment hearing to pay the assessment in full following the assessment hearing or include the assessment as part of their property tax statement. If the assessment is included on the property tax statement, the assessment will be spread over 15 years at an interest rate determined by the bonds sold to finance the improvements. If an 8% interest rate is assumed, the following payment schedule will result: 49519/exe.sum 3 Assessment = $3,967 Principal Interest Cost Per Cost Per Per Year Per Year Year Month 1st Year $264 $317 $581 $48 15th Year 264 21 285 24 Assessment = $2222 1st Year 148 $178 $326 $27 15th Year 148 12 160 13 REVENUE: Listed below is the estimated project cost and revenue expected from assessments: City Park Project Cost Assessment Revenue Assessment Balance $3,790,670 $2,598,452 $75,317 $1,116,901 It's estimate° approximately $1,192,218 will be financed by the City of Eagan through various enterprise and park funds. This amount represents 31.4% of the total project cost. PROJECT SCHEDULE Present Feasibility Report November 5, 1992 Public Hearing December 8, 1992 Approve Plans & Specifications Winter 1993 Award Contract Spring 1993 Substantial Completion Fall 1993 Assessment Hearing Fall 1994 First Payment Due w/Property Tax Statement Spring 1995 49519/exe.sum 4 • Cedar Grove ,Cedar Grove No. 6 No. 9 SILVER BELL ROAD.,,___. �= l•- •-.,/- 1`./4. �•_�. _.•_'� G•11111/.. •• Y^ r , J i s ybV' �/:`"// ••:hianuua .P1��0, U rs- Cedar Grove "� Y' "" �ad 9.-t•;.... i 4 -.•tsz:.....:;:::•"0::::::::"7,.,•,,...,..._.—.(+-.__. • ♦ 1 as::-.•..••..• ;.,.,2!.--.1 _ '__ .� Cedar Grove . , •.4;14 ' - `—; : ,_,.,17>,--,; i / • J-\ _ t f' ----DIFFLEY ROAD. �,• - - = f -.. -Cq.-_Rd.-�No. 30/.� Z r I � , i . ••• ' ,f .W , 151;,,. .. ; ', • „�i1/a11II ':.1.m 3 a { # '1 4' ;.;.'1:4,1......,i,t.:4' )::...;.1, -1..:,.;.'v.. .‘,,1 .. , �� ,// V ,�_� ' 7‘....---"---{ � -,� 1 \ 'v,. CLIFF ROAD Co. Rd. No. 32 Cedar Grove No. 4 a N >kaaa. bet LOCATION PLAN PROJECT No. 617R Bonestroo Rosena Anderlikb EAGAN, MINNESOTA r1 FIGURE 1 Associates CEDAR GROVE No. 3 4,5,6, & 9 `� Enpin.araa Archit.cti 2335 Woof Highway 96 49\49519\49519R03 OCTOBER 1992 COMM. 49519 St. Paul, Minnesota 5511 • 30'-36' 15'-18' 15'-18' r - C Ex. BIT. CURB ---------------- 1 1/2"-2 1/2" Bituminous with no definable aggregate base. Existing subgrade SP-SM (sand or gravelly sand, poorly graded to silty sand, or silty gravelly sand) EXISTING SECTION 28'-36' 14'-18' 14'-18' - / B618 CONC. DESIGN GRADE : :R:WN 4 i Note: 1" Type 41 Bituminous Wear Course Remove existing bituminous —2" Type 31 Bituminous Bose Course curb & bituminous surface. 3" Class 5 Aggregate Base PROPOSED SECTION STREET WIDTHS All streets are 32' unless otherwise noted. 36'-Carnelian Lane, Turquoise Tr. (Cedar Grove No.5) 28'-Diamond Point, Jade Pt (Cedar Grove No. 3) 28'-Copper Pt, Oynx Pt„ Nicols Service Rd (Cedar Grove No. 4) 28'-Pumice Ct, Cinnabar Ct (Cedar Grove No. 5) CEDAR GROVE No. 3,4, & 5 Bonestroo Rosene • Anderlik3 EAGAN, MINNESOTA FIGURE 10 Associates TYPICAL SECTIONS PROJECT No. 617R C,26 Engineers& Architects 2395 West Highway 36 K:\49\49519\R10 OCTOBER 1992 COMM. 49519 St. Paul. Minnesota 55113 32'-36' 16'-18' 16'-18' Ex. Surmountable Conc. Curb — 1 1/2"—2 1/2" Bituminous Existing Aggregate Base (Variable Thickness) EXISTING SECTION 32'-36' • 16'-18' 16'-18' Ex. Surmountabl Conc. Curb DESIGN GRADE ---------------- /6" CROWN --- T 1" Type 41 Bituminous Wear Course Note: 2" Type 31 Bituminous Base Course Remove existing bituminous 1" Class 5 Aggregate Base (Leveler) surface. Repair existing concrete curb & gutter as required. PROPOSED SECTION STREET WIDTHS All streets are 32' unless otherwise noted. 36'—Turquoise Trail (Cedar Grove No. 6) CEDAR GROVE No. 6 & 9 Bonestroo Rosene ION NEI EAGAN, MINNESOTA FIGURE 11 Anderiik3 Associates TYPICAL SECTIONS PROJECT No. 617R 7 Engineers/ Architects / 2335 West Highway 34 K:\49\49519\R10 OCTOBER 1992 COMM. 49519 St. Paul, Minnesota 5511 ■ i Proposed Concrete Curb _.; 25'R _ '~yr Existing t SO `-' ; _ Bituminous i ; • . ./ IP z Curb h � i '�,�` Proposed 25'4 i ; 125'R �„, Concrete Curb �o_ 25'R/ s Existing Bituminous f Curb Beryl Road Mica Trail Cul—De—Sac Cul—De—Sac (North of Turquoise Trail) (West of Pumice Lane) CEDAR GROVE No. 5 Existing E,1 Concrete Curb _ r 'i Gold Trail 25'R is,� \`� Cul—De—Sac i ' ; (West of Cinnabar Drive) Proposed 25'R`y` ,%i Concrete Curb _, I I f:_� Proposed g' `3 1 Concrete Curb is, Serpentine Drive ' Cul—De—Sac \ Existing (West of Lodestone Lane) Concrete Curb Existing Concrete Curb i i i '-25'R i r' 4- 1 Serpentine Drive .(7.,. p ..-------- � \ O 3 Cul—De—Sac 25'R t (West of Blackhawk Rood) �\ '---` 1 } Proposed t } Concrete Curb- CEDAR GROVE No. 6 CEDAR GROVE No. 5 & 6 Bonestroo Rosene • In Anderiik b EAGAN, MINNESOTA 7 FIGURE 1 1A Associates STREET CUL—DE—SAC IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT No. 617R I \49\49519\49519F09 OCTOBER 1992 COMM. 49519 1 t —1_1 1__. _ lair,a.ii-li.. e-milt,► –i i V. .1 � rY:= ; --i . CEDAR GROVE No. 5 a: --_,^,�y*" I �..._*.- ' { •t^' i i is - = s -puma:LA �• -" —~,+—�;i aY'is t-* is*.16-•— t. " J , - r , /T • r--- , ` — i : *:* -'' ;` CEDAR GROVE No. 3 `�- 1 _� '" r--- sore w as II, --i 1........_... — .�r L r +r_ ! • . eI - -e — CEDAR GROVE No 3 & 5 ju Bonestroo Rosena vii EAGAN, MINNESOTA FIGURE 12 Anderifk3 Associates STREET LIGHTING PROJECT No. 617R 19 s,Enginarsl Archltacts 2395 Woat Highway 36 \49\49519\49519F12 OCTOBER 1992 COMM. 49 St. Paul. Minnstaota 551 11' II I I I i I NICOLS ROAD $ t I I i ilf I i I f•- •it I • 1 1 UV1NG WORD —1 -- 1 ---.1 1 1 \\ 11 ..4 . \ 1 LUTHERAN CHURCH 1 \I 1, I I ! , [ _ DIAMOND DR 1 , I t t , ; $ I A I ; , , • 1 I ', I. 111111111111111 , i I *I $ , i $ i___ i $ , !.... __• I i r---,7 $ 04 i I ‘ ' PT 4 / f.,...... ./ ,/ vitiL 1 i ,1 % ' I -„f"t'ss'l i / # k:\ /// /4 I\ \ • ii ) 411111111p 4 I ; 1 -'qlrillp . ii .N.'' 1 N\ I \ . 1 1 ; I/ I 1 ) 1111111101' NI' i \ 1,, y i - .* —F* IA*sitillip41 LI\ 1 t N. 1 .L____I 0 4 • \ lop \ i ii 1 1 ) liE 4 r-------i---1 ,1 \ \ _. , I ; : ::1 1 / 4 /\ —7 : i *-------,/ . - g"—Za■-- 1 i i : • t i 0 130 303 L lizmaaal * I 1 L-31‘. # sows pi ha / ■N I . \ % I k I . . . .." !----- ‘•---...,•-- AI+ erl v * * OF <ik #7‘ r lik / i r‘0\1 —1 p 1 O i i/ f I \ I C 0, C, . - I .--.4 illIE - • . ____■ RAHN ROAD CEDAR GROVE No. 4 AA Bones troo sz-ua, flosene 11A— Anderlik & EAGAN, MINNESOTA FIGURE 13 Associates STREET LIGHTING PROJECT No. 617R &(,) RO8 OCTOBER 1992 COMM. 49519 _ ) Li &6_koix ) i./ I Nptia-ro RUE DR.' I 4 ;Air [ I i III I I -1 "-- • 1 1 ilit 1E 1 1 ' ' i :' , A 1 i ..tt ! I I .4ei Z # ' 0 ..rj1 E5 r7- - q --Aa'!A - - . ..t \ • • # \\N)... -.gr., LJ • 1 i i • . 1 1-----r—' • , ,.___, , \ ! : \ ,, \------- L i Li \ • -,__H , ,-, r, \___4. , ,.,,D_____,--- , 7-1 ' 1 • , ' I '7----1 __i , •R' 1-1; i t-- .CINI4Bir DR-. OS I - --;f P ti : Hs t—li----1 i /* ii * I t ,..,.._ —6.00, / ..... j:-...Thj_/ • .45 t 410:4400, L.,..., LpDE TONE c. LANE i 92 0 250 500 ScoSs in fast tit.4-V4q0NFE/Pri 1____T----/ .0 Ligt 1011*3 ir41M--4! _.._,i-) I hi: '\ i •; . —1-----sj A 1 4 1 i 1 : - ; I" , 4 11 i t r . 1 . , : ' --___I ' ■ . I *I : if,LACK _. -Ai, • ‘ ! , 43-1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 i 7-1 Fl 1----i -I I i if- - 1 * STREET LIGHT LOCATIONS CEDAR GROVE No. 6 & 9 iii Bonestroo Roaene ICU Anderlik & EAGAN, MINNESOTA FIGURE 14 vii Associates STREET LIGHTING PROJECT No. 617R 3( \49\49519\49519F14 OCTOBER 1992 COMM. 49519 11 il COMMERCIAL ROAD RESIDENTIAL ROAD INTERSECTION LIGHT STREET LIGHT BLACKHAWK ROAD RAHN ROAD NICLOLS ROAD CEDAR GROVE No 3, 4, 5, 6 AND 9 kJ Boneetroo Rosene • vil EAGAN, MINNESOTA FIGURE 15 Anderiik b Associates STREET LIGHT IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT No. 617R 49\49519\R12.DWG OCTOBER 1992 COMM. 49519 C �% \ Cul-De-Sac Modifications and Street Light Placement Project 617R November 27, 1992 To the Attention of: Thomas Egan -Mayor- Pat Awada _ Pamela McCrea �� + n Tim Pawlenty Ted Wachter ITC 1 1992 H #-Council Members- t i Thomas Colbert -Director of Public Works- After reviewing the Executive Summary for Street and Utility Project 617R, and discussing it among ourselves, we (representing the five households residing in the Cul-De- Sac in Figure 1) desire to have the 617R project leave our Cul-De-Sac - bad log proposed redesign would inconvenience us, particularly when guests are visiting. Further, we are in agreement that the existing layout of © Serpentine Drive the cul-de-sac is a feature that made Cul-t)e-S°c t 2sR (West of 8bdtherir Rood) \`� - •-^ our properties attractive when we initially purchased them, and to Proposed Concrete CIA change the layout now would CEDAR GROVE No. $ ultimately be detrimental to the market value of our properties. Figure 1: Proposed redesign of Cul-De-Sac 33 Page 1 of 2 Secondly, we ask that prior to placement - of the street lights, a representative of the city discuss with us informally the optimum placement of the street lights in the cul-de-sac. The currently proposed layout (Figure 2) has a street light placed in the middle of conjoined driveways. .7 Figure 2: Proposed placement of street lights Det i, i I r. L r l t 1760 Serpentine Drive (Cedar Grove 6. Block 6. Lot 11 Named (Printed) 55411 — �>vy Signature Phone e f j, I) i u r-i t-1 1762 Serpentine Drive (Cedar Grove 6. Block 6. Lot 2) Name (Printed) per( ✓, , t �Z, __ _ is z -- s-c,c)6 (]Signature Phone y L '`-- 1764 Serpentine Drive (Cedar Grove 6. Block 6. Lot 3) Name (Printed) c.1 r/ ( 4.--5 c, ,L r S-(7/- 7 7 / Signature Phone '4" 1/1 '1766 Serpentine Drive (Cedar Grove 6. Block 6. Lot 4) Name (Printed) 2 7 Signature Phone M L0.h A4 I I — 1768 Serpentine Drive (Cedar Grove 6. Block 6. Lot 51 Name (Printed) Signature Phone 3 '4 Pa_ge2of2 43�rw�4_ Z � ,1-41".„0.1.1.).:R:r Rr''E 4 i,Y; :,�•, c �a�' :fig ,,�, 4 'd city OF Qac�cn Report for Cedar Grove No. 3,4,5,6, and 9 Street and Utility Reconstruction Project No. 617R Eagan, Minnesota October, 1992 File No. 49519 ti8onestroo Rosen. VIAnderlik & Associates cnQlt,..r. a An:M.4t. 33' at.paid. Ylnn..ota Aliad Otto G.Bontmoo,PE. Hovva l A.Sanford,EL Michael P Rau,PE. Miles B.Jensen.PE. Bonestroo Robert W Rosen.PE.* Keith A Gordon.PE. Agnes M.Ring A IC P L.Philp Gravel Rh PE Joseph C.Anderkk.RE. Robert R.Fielferk,PE Thomas W Peterson.PE Karen L.Wrerneri.PE. Marvin L.Sorvala.PE. Richard W.Foster.PE. Michael C.Lynch.PE. Gay D.Krixufu.PE. zij. Rosene Richard E.Turner.PE. David O.Losinta P.E James R.Maland.PE. F Todd FORM.P.E. Glenn R.Cook.PE. Robert C.Russek A.I.A. Jerry D.Per¢sdt P.E Keith R.Yapp PE. Anderlik & Thomas E.Noyes.PE. Jerry A Bourdon.PE. Kenneth P Anderson.PE. Shawn D Gustafson,PE. Robert G.Schuncht.PE. Mark A Hanson,PE. Mark R.Rolls,PE. Ceciko Okvrer.P.E Associates Susan M.EbMin,CPA Michael T.Rauona n,PE. Mark A.Seip PE Charles A Erickson 'Senor Cosutare Ted K.Field,PE. Gary W Mn,aie P.E. Leo M.Pawelsky Thomas R.Anderson.AAA. Edgerton. Engineers & Architects Donald C.&rgatdt PPE. Dayl K Kirsc heroan,PE . James f Engelhardt Thomas E.Angus P.E. Pulp.1.Caswell P.E. Ismael Martinez PE. Mark D.Walks,PE. October 5, 1992 Honorable Mayor & Council City of Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55122 Re: Cedar Grove No. 3, 4, 5, 6, & 9 Street and Utility Reconstruction Project No. 617R Our File No. 49519 D ear Mayor and Council: Attached is our report for the Cedar Grove No. 3, 4, 5, 6, & 9 Street and Utility Reconstruction, Project No. 617R. This report discusses the proposed street and utility reconstruction and presents costs estimates for these improvements. Also included is the estimated assessment rate per lot. We will be pleased to meet with the City Council and other interested parties to discuss this report at a mutually convenient time. Yours very truly, BO ESTROO,.ROSENE, ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES, INC. , Cit,2.4-776i.it4/1\-- Mark A. Hanson I hereby certify that this report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Registered Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of MinAesota. wd b}• � ./. =Mark A. Hanson EaPublic Works Dept. Date: October 5, 1992 Reg. No. 14260 Date: wT. (. '9 z (� Reviewed by: � V vatic__ Fi 4 ce Department Date: 10 -.29-4A 49519.Rpt ...Z6 2335 West Highway 36 • St. Paul, Minnesota 55113 • 612-636-4600 CITY OF EAGAN CEDAR GROVE NO. 3, 4, 5, 6, AND 9 STREET AND UTILITY RECONSTRUCTION PROJECT NO. 617R TABLE OF CONTENTS Item Page Number INTRODUCTION 1 SCOPE 2 FEASIBILITY AND RECOMMENDATIONS 2 STREET EVALUATION 4 DISCUSSION 10 Street Improvements 10 Street Lights 19 Storm Sewer 24 Sanitary Sewer and Water Service Reconstruct 29 COST ESTIMATE 30 AREA TO BE INCLUDED: 31 ASSESSMENT 34 REVENUE 35 PROJECT SCHEDULE 36 APPENDIX A - PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE APPENDIX B - PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL APPENDIX C - STREET LIGHT ASSESSMENTS 49519r.rpt 37 STREET AND UTILITY RECONSTRUCTION INTRODUCTION: The City of Eagan similar to other communities is responsible for providing utilities and streets to serve existing and new developments. The City officials and its Public Works Department are also responsible for maintaining and upgrading these facilities as they approach the end of their useful design life. Typically, utilities have a design life of 40 to 80 years dependent upon how they've been maintained and constructed while streets have a design life of 20 to 25 years. The design life for streets is considerably less due to the nature of the materials that are used to build them, the weather they're exposed to and the amount of traffic they experience. The condition of each facili ty is a concern from a public safety standpoint.oint. Local streets and utilities serving Cedar Grove No. 3, 4, 5, 6, and 9 were constructed privately, approximately 25 to 30 years ago, in a manner which doesn't meet current local street standards. Therefore, the streets in this area have exceeded their useful design life and are in a deteriorated condition requiring reconstruction. It's also important that all homeowners and City officials know and are confident that these facilities are being maintained and replaced at the most opportune time and at a reasonable cost for the longest period of time. In an attempt to better inform homeowners of the condition of their streets, the City of Eagan recently had structural and surface evaluations done on the streets in Cedar Grove No. 3, 4, 5, 6, and 9. The results of the surface evaluations are presented in this report to help homeowners better understand the condition of their streets. These evaluations are based on technical and objective observations made by representatives trained in this work. 49519r.rpt • SCOPE: This project provides for reconstructing 8.5 miles of existing streets in Cedar Grove No. 3, 4, 5, 6, and 9 as shown on Figure No. 1. A breakdown of length of street per subdivision is listed below: Cedar Grove No. 3 1.7 miles Cedar Grove No. 4 2.0 miles Cedar Grove No. 5 2.5 miles Cedar Grove No. 6 & 9 2.3 miles Also included is the construction of new storm sewer and upgrading portions of the existing storm sewer system. Improvements are also proposed to the existing sanitary sewer and water main systems. Street lights have been included for the homeowner's consideration. It should be noted a similar street project was proposed for Cedar Grove No. 3, 4, and 5 (Project No. 413) in 1984. However, following the formal public hearing, the City elected not to proceed with the project. FEASIBILITY AND RECOMMENDATIONS: This project is feasible from an engineering standpoint and is in accordance with the Master Street Plans for the City of Eagan. The project can best be carried out as one contract. 49519r.rpt S Cedar Cedar Grove edar Grove No. 6 • No. , _._.. _7. SILVER BELL R s 1 ..'r^(�''/ `�''1. �•_ 's' '177.1114" teltll.FT i ,',r,; i=`.. ` .�/ f • �� ••••1114.mu.,��1�� £ , :. Cedar Grove .. _ 'sss y r.�b assss1a �• �i.n , No. 5 ;- ...::::.6.....: ....:::„.„.,,.,„.„,,,..,,,:.„....:,,,.:::,,„„,...,„::, :, ____ ... ,„. ,/ , ,,,,,,..........„ ..„,„,...,...::::,,,�::; �,' 1��i,••i,.�?,,Jb1 11. t¢ Cedar Grove • li NNo.3 , y r DIFFLEY ROAD �Co. Rd No. 30 �zJ{- (/• 4 W :9..'/I 2!:11.11 = r L1.1 11 1� .■le J CLIFF ROAD Co. Rd. No. 32 Cedar Grove No. 4 Ni 0 1000 0000 lode Mt t il LOCATION PLAN PROJECT No 61 7R Bonestroo VI Rosene Anderlikb EAGAN, MINNESOTA FIGURE 1 Associates CEDAR GROVE No. 3,4,5,6, & 9 Enptll..rsa Archtt.cts 2835 W.at Highway 38 49\49519\49519803 OCTOBER 1992 COMM. 49519 St. Paul, Minnesota bbtt3 STREET EVALUATION: The streets in Cedar Grove No. 3, 4, 5, 6 and 9 are proposed to be reconstructed as part of this project. The justification for street reconstruction is based on the following: - Street Age - Structural Strength - Surface Condition In accordance with engineering standards, the anticipated life of a pavement is 20 to 25 years. As previously mentioned, the life of a street is based on the materials used to build it, the weather it's subjected to and the amount of traffic it experiences. The streets in Cedar Grove No. 3, 4, 5, 6, and 9 are 25 years old or older. Therefore, each street has exceeded it's design life based on its age. The desired structural strength of a local street is 7 to 9 ton design. The heavier design thickness is recommended due to the size of services vehicles (garbage trucks, school buses, etc.) presently serving residential neighborhoods. In the case of the streets in the Cedar Grove Additions, the recommended overlay thickness for all streets ranged between 11/2' to 21/2" based on the test results. This structural testing was accomplished by use of the Road Rater which is an electro-hydraulical device which imposes a load to the roadway and measures its deflection. Based on the measured deflection, a recommended equivalent overlay thickness is determined to prevent the deflection based on the required load. The final and most important consideration for evaluating an existing street is its surface condition. The Pavement Condition Index (PCI) ranks the surface condition of each street. Table 1 presents the categories which define PCI Rankings. 49519r.rpt 4 TABLE 1 PCI MAINTENANCE REQUIRED 55-100 Routine (Crack SeaJ/Seal Coat) 35-55 Patch/Repair and/or Overlay 0-35 Reconstruct In general, PCI Rankings below 35 require removal of the existing bituminous pavement before constructing a new bituminous surface. In some cases, based on soil borings, the existing aggregate base may also have to be reconstructed. PCI Rankings between 35 and 55 require patching before constructing a bituminous overlay. PCI Rankings over 55 typically don't require bituminous overlays and generally routine maintenance such as crack sealing and seal coat is adequate. As noted on Figures No. 2, 3, 4, and 5, nearly all of the PCI Rankings are below 40 while only a few are over 40. Therefore, based on the PCI Rankings, street reconstruction is required. In summary, based on the age, structural strength, and surface evaluation of the streets in Cedar Grove No. 3, 4, 5, 6, and 9 street reconstruction is required. 4C2- 49519r.rpt 5 I-2r- e' 3...___L..... ;\ ! / ‘ N., > . .. • , i , , ,z3,- , ,-----‹ 1 1 r---r- , .y-'1_,,_; d „ ' i • i cc ..--, , 1 1 ,-,---- .41.) i , 1 L___ N.,,..; YOlgr.OFIE. (..el ",.. a t5 .---1,, \ -cij , -I %I. El -- -\---\ --A- T --. cv --,4 , i ,t , / I 1 c , II --7 44.7 \ i . f 1 I Er '.-1 i . ., . , i 1 / j 0 tri. '' . : 2 61‘ ‘ I / / I-W444, s _____.\ \ , e , / I— 1 i rt i 1 > \/ 1 i 1 I 1 ,` ! , --_, i --, \ / i : ,,-- i -, i -.---,:f 1 1 I 1 CARNELIAN LA /' X:I ..,-.„ !z 1 / / / , i • •.. 1 / / / • Rzzil : / i / f4.4 I g 1 , / / f 4414" IS' / t tz , / , / 4 r / / ki—LA i , i i I / ' ! I 1 et / 1 i a/ / , , f / . / 1 1 ArN.i d —_ 1 1 421 fel t ri# . , 111 : 1 f 1 _Ads N 0 200 400 IiiaMiiii 711 i Seals In toot 1 t*" i (>.:_fQ) I CEDAR GROVE No. 3 ili Bonestroo Rosene , , a m Anderlik& EAGAN, MINNESOTA FIGURE 2 Associates PAVEMENT CONDITION INDEX PROJECT No. 617R Enginoorsa Archltoets 2335 Wo K:\49\49519\RO3 OCTOBER 1992 COMM. 49519 /4 e Highway 30 St. Paul, Minnesota 55113 f 1 1 1 I I I I 1 J r---- 1 N1COLS ROAD 1 .1. Sr SER4CE RO4D 0/7 I 1 11 1 1111 I L , LIVING WORD 0 1 • LUTHERAN CHURCH I I , r 11111111114,/, . . ,.......__________, ril ,..........„ „../ , t. , , , f . ‘ t i , A , , .1 f ‘ ; --.. P"-----11---".---"*"--. $ . / . , ii •.., \ t ,..,,,.... ! ,.... ,, ..... i Pr 4 5 .1 t 's • , \ I 0. 1 t-----i i 1 1 .41* . 444 , /,/....„.............. -- _1 \ , 1 44111%•:,; , °--,,,iff 4'-•,,,, .... I •,... ',.< 141 -*. I ...... ,,,, il ?----......„.../ . - i 1 t / ts. i t "4•,, 1 0................i........_ .41111110p. 11114 C"-4.„,),''),..,..„... ; ' t I 1 ;If 4 I ! 1 \\... 7-1 4 ; ; ...........i...._.i 4. — I 4 1 f \ .7 , ., \ , ................... 0...... 7._ ...i_ t....._.' ..... ... ,,,, --,,----,--,*-----------:... smb 'kijoR . \ ----z--...._ , 1 / \ 1 1 I / i '''''ic./ ,----. • '''\.? . . . :it,. • 0 130 300 : 1 I / >< / \\,...,/ iaMEMEa ! Saile in bet / \ I i 2 1 i I ! $ A I ; 1 $ 0$3\' : ; i L..._1 l / ! , • I ! 2 I 1 t 1„ I ...1 1 I —FL 1 1 i ! . ...",...„1 i ! , ! 1 , 3 1 1 1 i I t 1 I !_ i_ i 1 ! i ,----- 0= PCI KAHN ROAD . CEDAR GROVE No. 4 n Bonestroo , Rosana m Anderlik & EAGAN,1 MINNESOTA FIGURE 3 Associates PAVEMENT CONDITION INDEX PROJECT No. 617R R08 OCTOBER 1992 COMM. 49519 . . II/00,, "14 1 ...," ‘11414ireA, 44:yri 1 le 4,111111011144 1111111111 -----' \ . ItsWP1410, 111,.. 111P 4 1,Z; 1 4* Ili .Loit -*- ciiim.v. / , , \ IN" 414 Ninir 40 ' ' / 44110$ gal nit ---y 1 fs; -I;0 L----1 i------i ( ' i ' 1160 Aili UMW I l .....13)..._i L___1 \ , ________,. / : 1 1 6.1 ... >---1 1 i_ . ------1-7.;. wo:, \ ).\ I 1 mcoortim I \ \ \ 7-n Y 84 tirSI°Ne it / \ /\ \ — \ ,...,-- ..... '' /is.,.‘,. -•...4<litrl Z i fa. D —Th i 1 \ \ ,....,' ' ''--44: 'i\ * i LIJ1 (3 L 1 CP . PUMICE PT SP ,-- —I. ' '41 IX, Wil ....., L- i :.,..ozn ,..._A-... .,.._1 L.... I L .,;.. ._ . y 0 -*V • •, i : , ,.L.., . CARIVAIAN , i i 1 I i I i ,___ i J---1 L LA ,-- JADE LA ----____ JADE L4) L4 ,-,-- qAtftv4 ADD }= C' N >---, q../ 4mmodir Sole la fait N < !? -7-- Efel CEDAR GROVE No. 5 iii Bonestroo Rosene , • Andrlika EAGAN. MINNESOTA FIGURE 4 m Asso eciates PAVEMENT CONDITION INDEX PROJECT No. 61 7R Enginoersd Architoots 2935 Most Highway 96 49\49519\R04 OCTOBER 1992 COMM. 49519 St. Paul. Minnesota 55119 . 1 _it. t 3 t k \ -------- ) t ./ Nflti4t7-0 RUE DR. 71 ROAO ......i i Pr I I ,--- 1 1 1 ! , Iillil li , , i i • - • , - _ . I MO* • 1*40 0\ Q 4&1P # Vt a GB z -..„ i lir. ‘DR\ 74470 *, • 1 -c 'talrrAlk .. 4 ksy I I : 0 ,:..) , Aii • , ....v„,. . .... . —11 1 ' i-ti • 1 AL A let i __,' i I 1 1E- . 1---f\x„,,■ 1111:„.„..e . ° iir..-+ 4 t----t— A- , M-...i i___11 ,7\ ' ' '1-7 _ / 0.): 4. / 414„, , ...../ - 1 --1,....1 1 \_,„„ .- . \ ' v : 1.-*--7 1 Nillif \ " ---- ' i \ 1 \ 1,___ f irk, )----1---ir A\,-_,-„\\ , ...s? , , ... , ,,---,- i . r- 1 1 . wk.._ .., 2.- 1 1 \ \ .----' 1 c' i " ------- 1 Ii.\..„---c---\ i PPSIAL PR -- I ---- me 0 I • ' ' cittow\li---"L 1 / \ I --,, ,, ,.,1 ■ CD ' / i r4 ___--1,__ i_ 7 mi 1 At.e.4 . 14 < C----- cI-- ---....4_ /......Ty; \----,; --f-----1,t,_ , I 1.......„..__ili ........_7_, -----y--..,,,..s \ . .;›,..../ 0 250 300 — Sods 10EiiiiiirEii i,. I? ---1 :volla• In feet if; : "0 WA/. • 77".- • . • i I —H L_ Pr icS r r-----1- i , fiv• 4-1--- il IN I 1 4 t---, 16 ___A4- : ' 1. I I ii. , 1ji , .....„ L...L._,. I I i % ..,1 I --1 `-------1 1 in CEDAR GROVE No. 6 • ; . , es= PC1 CEDAR GROVE No 6 & 9 n Bones troo Rosene ...... , • Anderlik & EAGAN, MINNESOTA FIGURE 5 in Associates PAVEMENT CONDITION INDEX PROJECT No. 617R 4 R09 OCTOBER 1992 COMM. 49519 DISCUSSION: Cedar Grove No. 3, 4,and 5 Street Improvements - Streets proposed to be improved in Cedar Grove No. 3, 4, and 5 are identified on Figures No. 6, 7, 7A, and 8. The existing street section in Cedar Grove 3, 4, and 5 is presented on Figure No. 10. The existing street section incorporates a 30'-36' wide street with bituminous curb. The existing bituminous thickness varies between PA" and 21/2". Soil borings could not delineate between the aggregate base and subgrade soils. It's assumed a minimal aggregate base thickness was initially constructed because of the good subgrade soils. Street construction proposed herein for Cedar Grove No. 3, 4, and 5 includes removal of the existing bituminous surface and curb. A new B618 concrete curb and gutter is proposed to be constructed in conjunction with a new 3" thick bituminous pavement over a new 3" thick aggregate base as presented on Figure No. 10. The proposed street width is 32' between face of curbs in accordance with City of Eagan street standards with the exception of certain streets identified on Figure No. 10. Carnelian Lane and Turquoise Trail are designated neighborhood collectors in the Eagan Street Plan. Therefore, it's proposed their width be constructed to 36' between face of curbs. In addition, cul-de-sac streets and Nicols Service Road in Cedar Grove No. 4 are proposed to be constructed 28' wide between face of curbs. An Alternative is presented in lieu of reconstructing the existing Nicols Service Road. The alternative provides for removing the existing service road and extending each residential driveway to Nicols Road as presented on Figure No. 7A. Also included is constructing an 8' wide bituminous trail. The City is agreeable to construct either alternative depending on what the homeowners prefer. 49519r.rpt 10 j�7 Due to the new concrete curb and gutter construction, driveway and boulevard restoration is required. Driveway restoration will include reconstructing the bottom portion of the existing driveway to match the new concrete curb to the existing driveway. The driveway • will be reconstructed of the same material (bituminous or concrete). Sanitary sewer manhole and gate valve box adjustment is also required. The large existing cul-de-sacs adjacent to Bluestone Lane, Beryl Road, and Mica Trail are proposed to be reconstructed in accordance with Figure No. 6 and 8. Cedar Grove No. 6 and 9 Street Improvements: Streets proposed to be improved in Cedar Grove No. 6 and 9 are identified on Figure No. 9. The existing street section in Cedar Grove No 6 and 9 is presented on Figure No. 11. The existing street section incorporates a 32'-36' wide street with surmountable concrete curb and gutter. Street construction proposed herein for Cedar Grove No. 6 and 9 includes removal of the entire bituminous surface between the concrete curbs. A new 3" thick bituminous pavement is proposed to be constructed on the existing aggregate base as presented on Figure No. 11. A 1" thick aggregate base leveler including excavation is estimated to be constructed on all the streets. However, after removal of the existing bituminous surface it's expected more or less gravel base may be required in certain areas dependent on the condition of the existing subgrade and aggregate base. It's also estimated 3,500 lineal feet of concrete curb and gutter will be reconstructed due to its condition and catch basin reconstruction. Driveway repair will be required where concrete curbs are repaired at each driveway. Sanitary sewer manhole and gate valve box adjustment is also required. The large existing cul-de-sacs adjacent to Serpentine Drive and Gold Trail are proposed to be reconstructed in accordance with Figure No. 9. 49519r.rpt 11 47-gi . . o . \ \ , : , Proposed i 1 Concrete Curb Curb ***''64NNaNN Bluestone Lane Cul—De—Sac T Street ,.Jr- pLA, i 1 — RUE DR iv r-- • Improvement 'i .; ' L'i- z ____ B.7L- - ,.— \ifor_\ 1 i 10 --„, \ ; 1C / i 1111:\Ill/ op 35!35!37 1 37 1 38 39 401 41 42 43 . •2 "'s ' 34\ fivesn*ElAj. ' ! 16 OUTLOT A 13 *L--0-6-1 5.6--T 0bk20 33 , --- 14 15 7 ` . 21, 32 6 7 8 9 10 11 2\ 14 ------,-,- is 122r ct: 6 4 5 6 ;--,',-,t-----:,-.,. -., /231 * 1% i' 1 5 6 \ \ 13 13 '-,..::„.::,,,,,, „-----T----- ---,4, /24/2 ,/ ; 4 25\24\23!22 IT 14; 3 27, / / 3 26 \ 2\i>/.\_15.4131 12 , -,. ,48/Ay i'----,:,,27 ..-----r---,_ \ 2; "--,„ •- : 2 , A,, ,,./, X\4\5!6 -", -z ' , ;1,„ , ,■:,,,,.. ..., •'.' ` A ‘:----- tg 2 : 7 =, : i f 4/ '?--,, , ---, - . .1 28 ,-,X 3\ k f ;71,4:--,..4._ 10 t, 1 5/6 1 \ re--4_21,...,,, ---;.--------4\ \,‘4 t.), •,, 6-141-*„..t ,,,,"Z , .1 ! 8/2-\;‘,:y 1 rektiVAN LA ›'-jI./ -1'Y21/1 '. 1 9/7°1 7-7"-----;1 '' 7 / ° 1 I 1 • 126 0,,-- i '-\.‘,.:,---;„ i 7' k f'''''-":.,9<i ' • ",■,,,f /20A a 1 19A 8/ ' f 8; • /, g :Lc , 9 / ,,, --„,:: .7:15/ ' 11/ ,/ , '----4.„,. / —1 8/ cz,:, - / 1 0.• i '-',,,, , , 114/ , 1 1 •.< • / ---- 17/16 1 i 15 i I 111 t i ',..._ ' ',...,,,........„ . i 2 11,1jir: ASSESSMENT AREA '-'14 , f 123 r1 / fr''IN•,. '' fli!ii /.23f ' 31 4 1 L /1 4/1 5/ (., ,,22 :, 4,45/6 i. .- 13 .„ -. 6/ /16/ / '-'--../41/20 . / 7 . Q. i 7 L'I 9 110 i g i f ' /1 91 , •"-:, /18/_,/ 1 • i JADE LA 10/ ,20/2.6/ .. '-..,4.:Zi 161 s ■ ____ , ,151141130F/ • 11/12-13 4/ . 14-,/ /221..,-zr ' 1 , ---1---1- — '1 15 1617 ., 4 2111 I r '' ' .- •l - . - I 4 5 I 6 ! 7 1 ; .. • i I I * 1 18'17/ 8 16 15, 14 I N, . 200 400 iW.T!g■iii 13 !---.. ; sada in fast I DRIVEWAY LOCATION CEDAR GROVE No. 3 kJ Bonestroo Rosene Anderiike. EAGAN, MINNESOTA FIGURE 6 Associates STREET IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT No. 617R 4La Engineers& Architects 2335 West Highway 30 K:\49\49519\49519F06 OCTOBER 1992 COMM. 49519 , / St. Paul, Minnesota 551t3 I = 1 w MCOLS ROAD _ , I /� 1 i ii n UR 7 € 7 8 9 10 11 1 it 1 1 2 — _ 17 1 3 4 5 1 6 LIVING WORD \ 1 1 ! I © LUTHERAN CHURCH t '_. 1 34 33 32 31 30D 26 25 PARCEL 241-06 j S i i : t t A t `t € t .``� i 14 16 17 : 19 20 21 22 23 14 15 19 ! L.. l € ! 1 ' �`.` ' ��\�`�,�� It € 13 28 27 26 24 13 16 / 18 e:/ �'``— _� a I,? `'\\ N r` I 12 14 ;��-�. 12 / 17 �r ..-- : t 1 \')- \ i 29 25 f s t : `' , ''' 1 1 13 4.1i 18 16 ! Q,t ) 1 1 I 1t f f�.' RYM' / �1 / \ 1 32 f 33 =�:11 0 15 t % 31 l / #�ci. � 1k\�\//,,'�� i�i ls, 10 35 34 / . 20 . 14 �G<i' 1 I 's 9 10 l 36 8 t V 13 1 . P i i ' ; 7 7 1 2 / 12 Q 3 8 Si g e" 4 `� \ 1 1 ti V 1 f 6 23 1 �i s� t : :I 8 1 38 ° f``,.,., 5 k� (. 0 , l �7 $ , 4 2524 / f 910 ., ' '` 1 6 ' 7 39 3 1 1 40 \26.li 1 6 2 .� , /�,.8 .`„. s 5 1 41 28 / 7 ! t 4 = 4 42 t_.--L-- 6 /N., r I 3 43 , 4 L__............ y" 2 1 2 44 1 k` 2 L3 \ 1 1 40 L ,1 1 45 41 ' '------7—: 39 ' \ STREET IMPROVEMEN _ ....._... ._._T _ v - —1 T_7 / S4NQ NE DR { . A \t .. ,.M-- 1$ i , 10 1 2 3 4 ' 5 / Z�..._ *,..i _ 26 25 24 23 % / sod.ti hot boo o Aso.,.'', € j,O ` 1 € x '21 1 0 1 7 € ;._ .. . `V ASSESSMENT AREA t' � Q _. 1 i 2 3lq ,� i 6 t ��j �'S is € 31 ' „'( 18 , 1 ' / ! 5 . s. _.� ��6 �17 PARCEL 010-75 €__30 8 7 , \\,://16/, ® // , 15 1/2 Lot 1 i —_.r' i —11'''t40 ''12 t 13 i / f Equiv. i E 2 } 27 Q 10 11 1 } t 14 f 15 S I i I i 1 I _T.....L._._._i. € 1 i 1 RAHN ROAD CEDAR GROVE No. 4 ■ DRIVEWAY LOCATION Bones troo Rosene ■ Ill Anderlik b EAGAN, MINNESOTA FIGURE 7 Associates STREET IMPROVEMENTS RO8 OCTOBER 1992 COMM. 49519 k`_ * ■ 1 1 I I I I I / 1 I EXISTING 11 Ct.j LJ EXLSTlNG 11'. .j TRAIL i' TRAIL I J� LI • I L MOKID 's � NMG 1 LN6+G MORD I UJ CHuRCH I LUTH CHURCH ' I ' L --__= RESURFACE '__ L ___ DRIVEWAY I 241 TO CHURCH I 241-06 I PARKING 1 PARKING I 1 3 o5 c= c_ o5 c= c= I I U EXTEND ALL I ► I I L -1 I DRIVEWAYS I.: "'I I e 1 111 25 TO NICHOLS RD i s j 11 25 _J 16' WIDE 1sT L-J I I r l BITUMINOUS r-1 ?10 26 ko - ?10 25 ii R -L ' r I L� C*._ r1- I IIII r1 _.14 11 I 1 11 28' WIDE I 9 9 1 jk 1 0 9 SERVICE ROAD _.L_j 27 + -I_; 27 r-1 I I_rl 6 1 ► (L-1.L. 25 26 -I iJ t �LJ 11 1 1 1 •. ' .Jrr, 29 I I J+'Tl 29 1_J_J 1 J..J r as -r_1 1 7/r-1 I I 1 I I L_----r 30 ; _L J 30 to _.. -4__I _ -.4.--J 1 8' WIDE 8ITUUINOUS ► V 1 TRAIL I I 34-21-J 5 31 r, l �5 31 i r z'r_1 ,I-1 1 1 I `-1-41 31 I �L-4- 37 ,.—t_ L T --tJ L In I r 1 r 1:• ,,�I I U ..� 1 1 K-J i. Ti_r__,--- I I=1 12 12 x Li ► L.0._J I /N , -� I 7i r-TLJ 1 I 1 L_J 1 I .� L_J 1 DMAIOND D�� _ , aW1AA0A►O 04-- -.EXISTING r"---"I rJ-+ EXISTING ' r--'' -1-- TRAIL L_sJ L .... TRAIL L__r-J L , I 17 16 - 17 16 . I s N SERVICE ROAD NO SERVICE ROAD DRIVEWAYS EXTENDED TO NICHOLS ROAD 0 100 200 Seek in feet CEDAR GROVE No. 4 — NICHOLS SERVICE ROAD ki Bonestroo In Roeene Anderlik b EAGAN, MINNESOTA FIGURE 7A Associates STREET IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT No. 617R '1/4-5ji R11 OCTOBER 1992 COMM. 49519 ',_----„\\ 25'R,f , 3 L I ►c '�. , " Proposed �� Concrete Curb 25'R Existing ASSESSMENT AREA Bituminous Curb ? 1 I Beryl Road . Cul—De—Sac . v£ti s �5\'4 3 , .\ 4 i 3 1 2 I 1 w cl 'Aj t 12 9\8\7\6\5 i 3 IP 4400"� ?K 16 ° ,' i10 { .: 1 i Ar �'o� '-`22 I 18 17 ."P1 3L24\25 O ��e •.4 ; 21 19 20:21 22 2 W 19 • \ �._ 9 icy\ ` 5 4` .', �(l.i • 3 2 1 3\2 1 176 _ 4 �r X19 / .; .'r' \,......,—, ' / '' ^',—'43t t 5' `18; f; \4 1 22 7 \,~.,,CT. �' 6 \ 6 X17 r' 'r 6\5 16 117 21 16 8 9 10 ' F- < a 8 ,..,\ 16 y �, 20 ..a , o tt 7 , g\J�{\y ,15 ;;A,,. {;$',`7 VI • 115 y 18 19 1 ;15 14 13 12 ' 11 �`'�• r � 14 .13 f ~ 12t \ r 1 +: 116 1 6 7 i 14> ,*., 9 11 y� . 1 ''''.\,10. - ;13,12 :11 0 9 8 7 ' 5 /4 3 i 2 1 2 . I 2 ` 1503 AbT 1 7 6 4�..%�24\% 16�15 i Existing 1 i 3 199 ,) i. 2 \23 r'i 7` --; TA ---------1.-/t E rn L_. 8 © 21 i�C� .2 . ,,..•- \. I ..rW_.._.-1._......, \� BUpNE 3 9 20 � � 13 . 2 t .t 180-..... -W 1 \Lot u U , �k 10 19 ti 12 3 19 -...� Equiv. i -,x •...� 5 11 •18 �_ 9 2�= 1? 4 20 _, - >. •_ --- v, ... Proposed 6 1 12 17 8 3 10 5 . 21 _._ __ Concrete Curb _ 0 7 1 13 16 ' jr- , xt 9 6 �..► 22* /`2„'\ � - L4 1 s s 1 a 15 6 `5 •• 8 e , 23 ... /,- Existing — -'� '� ��Bituminous — _ •60. bi Curb � 1 13 1 1 CARNELIAN 4 3 2 1 f t 1. 96 t e #-- 25'i i 125'R CARNELIAN . 1------ -- 596-A0fiJADE .. i f (199i) f . rr I 1 1 E LA- .i;,: A'- Mica Trail A Street �` -�` Cul-De—Sac __�__ "'c'�-.� Improvement c n3\: _- 1 F 1 't t`ti„ 0 200 400 i Same in fast ■ DRIVEWAY LOCATION CEDAR GROVE No 5 jil Bonestroo •�_ Rosene EAGAN, MINNESOTA FIGURE 8 Anderiikd Associates STREET IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT No. 61 7R -' Engineers& Architects 2935 west Highway 36 49\49519\49519F08 OCTOBER 1992 COMM. 49519 St. Paul, Minnesota 55113 1419 ADT . . : r Existing Curb Asse 3SM ent Area7 1 Concrete u (1991) _.. ._ . rri an an il&stit ) BEAU D RUE DR. „ C) Gold Trail 251R Ird•, \ \ 462-01 ''' Cul-De-Sac "P % \ i 1 / 161 MARELL'S ti — 4 • .•‘n,) i 25.R ...._)/...: Concrete Curb I •, 2 ;St (-4-4."• r.,,---':':',11 1 1 / . 3 1 : 4 p Z ! i 1 ... -V'' , C) .1 Proposed , 2 C) 1 0 BALLANTRAE Fii ' Concrete Curb 4t■jr‘ %..k.,,..,, t". ../31 I ist ADD. I 3 0 0 Serper,tine Dri..;;.N, 4." • Cu. ae Sac Existing , \ \ \ Concrete Curb i )\ \- Ny,/, Nsz-y-\---\--\-- ),_ i Existing 16 Concrete Curb , I ! ,, i / ,.. s. • ---,/,x .'7:\ - II---= s-,/ 1 Kx1 i, \%. , ._I -.. ris.. ......„., 8 .,2 .4%...-- - 25'R 13, ,/--..,/ .. ,)- „,,),,_,,„ ri) Serpentine Drive l ( IP . ,,,, ...7 ) - ” 127 if_7 3 . NI / --'!,-. 11 6 i r4 s % .' e .,...___±. ...---., Grove 110.1 . . _ ./.10 9 -., ..--18: ' 3 k 'Y4 - • - .- 11 .,-, " --,*' Concrete Curb '---......--- . ; Street - 7 --1--- ) - 6 1 ,1 i : \ ImprpierOent : , _ 1..,..13 2$ 7 --- _it—, 5 i:-.L.: •''' ';`47.41‘..'.'''';'*''', 5 i ' ,•,-., v. • CRYSt4L DR , IC 71-1 _.---1,,,% r "sal \ %-.......—...., ,....---i \ ati°"ImPERIDOT 8. 7 6 5 / 4 s , 2 '. 9 _...,___1 40 PARK ss, 1— L.......-1-,--- . 1,...., ,r,1:1-1'' ----y --V2 i‘ ,--- (2 Lot Equiv.) , '' 1 2-... ' -riz--",„, ,", 3 --1.., _ L.._ _ ... ..per / , -7 'GI 16. -(----- '----- ..<_,:iN; ,26 25 24 t..---,,,„_„•\‘ k 2 r __.... P/2 < ; 2;--r-;-,r 5 > 1 k-,-...., ir 1 0 t ^-<, ,5,?"--r-\ .\ ' / )..± i .4-3--9-` i , I"I -----(-----„," i---....,...., <mi /10„7„,. „\...05,.. 4\ J.. z.,28 22 /\ 1--aLl* :-- ?i--, 41NE'LA ,l 4_414.,i- / -•,. 4:44).----*21\20 : 15 , -§- I '--•• 8 i-,, 11 ".. \ \ ,/ :„.). co t, • 42 N•oj.,..„-rkscep?..7 Af 1-0,.....„r , • ‘43/41 \•,7IN 2_,), 9 -.--' ''..7-. ----1 , . 3 ' 6 '•44"/ \ DiC9N /3 I.---i' : 47-IT- , ,,; 6644-.A.,, ‘nr. .), E-s-\_,.,,-----, ---- i --- -- ----1-- .---1, s 3'._.4"v, /ries_,'S.9,..---\.' -...-'34\,, 6_, r — 4 •.. 4 ---,-, — 'i-- r38 i. , '', f ,--,...,C, 32 t ----, 55-'2, \'r < 4 ..:8 N3 5 . . . _ - i_ 13 ,501 49 37 t• —i.. 1 , ....6._•4c, i - 1Pi,48 ' 1* ' 53 4 55/56$7 5859 86 A Orltg i . 1 "' .j_i____L__ 0 250 500 ilk BLACKHAWK ROAD cannm ---- — 77 r . ! r Seale in feet . 1 i • • i , 1680 ADT Cedar Grove No. 6 (1991) i f 1 1%. CEDAR GROVE No. 6 & 9 DRIVEWAY LOCATION Bonestroo Rosene . • m Anderiik di EAGAN, MINNESOTA FIGURE 9 Associates STREET IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT No. 617R \49\49519\49519P09 OCTOBER 1992 COMM. 49519 5-13 i 30'-36' 15'-18' 15'-18' C Ex. BIT. CURB ---------------- — 1 1/2"-2 1/2" Bituminous with no definable aggregate base. Existing subg,rade SP-SM (sand or gravelly sand, poorly graded to silty sand, or silty gravelly sand) EXISTING SECTION L 28'-36' 14'-18' 14'-18' B618 CONC. v- GRADE C & G ----- 6" CROWN f1 Note: Li 1" Type 41 Bituminous Wear Course Remove existing bituminous 2" Type 31 Bituminous Base Course curb Sc bituminous surface. 3" Class 5 Aggregate Base PROPOSED SECTION STREET WIDTHS All streets are 32' unless otherwise noted. 36'-Carnelian Lane, Turquoise Tr. (Cedar Grove No.5) 28'-Diamond Point, Jade Pt (Cedar Grove No. 3) 28'-Copper Pt, Oynx Pt„ Nicols Service Rd (Cedar Grove No. 4) 28'-Pumice Ct, Cinnabar Ct (Cedar Grove No. 5) CEDAR GROVE No 3,4, & 5 Al Bonestroo Rosene ..._ • Anderlik& EAGAN, MINNESOTA FIGURE 10 Associates TYPICAL SECTIONS PROJECT No. 617R Enp)neers6 Architects I • 2335 West Highway 36 j K:\49\49519\R10 OCTOBER 1992 COMM. 49519 St. Paul, Minnesota 551' 32'-36' 16'-18' 16'-18' Ex. Surmountable C Conc. Curb — 1 1/2"-2 1/2" Bituminous Existing Aggregate Base (Variable Thickness) EXISTING SECTION 32'-36' - 16'-18' 16'-18' - Ex. Surmountable Conc. Curb DESIGN GRADE ------------------ 6" CROWN / j i T -1" Type 41 Bituminous Wear Course Note: —2" Type 31 Bituminous Base Course Remove existing bituminous 1" Class 5 Aggregate Base (Leveler) surface. Repair existing concrete curb & gutter as required. PROPOSED SECTION STREET WIDTHS All streets are 32' unless otherwise noted. 36'-Turquoise Trail (Cedar Grove No. 6) CEDAR GROVE No. 6 & 9 IA Bonestroo Rosene iri Anderlik& EAGAN, MINNESOTA FIGURE 11 Associates TYPICAL SECTIONS PROJECT No. 617R ` �°�� Engineers& Architects � 2335 west Highway 30 K:\49\49519\R10 OCTOBER 1992 COMM. 49519 St. Paul, Minnesota 55113 Street Lights - Street lights are also proposed to be installed as part of the street project. Figure No. 12, 13, and 14 shows the location of each proposed street light. Figure No. 14A shows the typical steel light at the intersections along Blackhawk Road, Rahn Road, and Nicols Road. Also shown is the typical street light along the interior residential roads in Cedar Grove . No. 3, 4, 5, 6, and 9. It should be noted Cedar Grove No. 3 and 4 is served by Northern States Power (NSP) while Cedar Grove No. 5, 6, & 9 is served by Dakota Electric. 49519r.rpt 19 F !r ;�'' _ LA ii M, ; `; - CEDAR GROVE No. 5 1 - 1 rill k 11 .:, \yam. ,... iti --...,->•.,‘, ./ ,-*/ ,e , • 1 it _ ... -.._.. .may _ jbm, IL* gi * a*yr v * *Ivo * is ir i ii* , a - if . -Ai- ' * , U ' ► CEDAR GROVE No. 3,7i: 4, ' • 0 300 !OD sewtira at ‘ ii 11 ilk fa .. MOMS RD. CEDAR GROVE No. 3 & 5 n Bonestroo • Rosene EAGAN, MINNESOTA FIGURE 12 : t1 Ass STREET LIGHTING PROJECT No. 617R Engtnes/re& Architects ,„.5'7 2935 West Highway 90 \49\49519\49519F12 OCTOBER 1992 COMM. 49519 81. Paul, Minnesota 55113 III■SN■•I0II■IIIMln. 1 I _. 1 1 1 1 I t f : -- 1 1 i MOMS ROAD I I f r t 1 *. ISE ilir t k I i LUTHERAN CHURCH L LIVING WORD 'OND DR i r-----------1 r) '--r--- 1/ \ \ i !-----1 I I- N ..-i ', ,„ \ t \ / I \,..... 41E 1 <i i \\ \-4 •„'t i . 4 or ,'''''''' . / i r * , ! IN* .. iiipr ,/ i t / i t •,\/ / y .k L ....dialikillopp 4411pr iiir i / 1. --- 1 t : `k, i I t 3 i i,.. , , • ' ! . 3 , li _ -----* ---1 * / i ''''■/ ./''`It, 1 1 t 1 , 0 -- i I ; , \ N ..„ --...........i L___4_,._____1 "---i -4--- ---7--V, 1 -L,,, i i 1 li--2.-- -- ----),-- -.1t,'''-,4,4•,--4=si .—.—.....1 —... ,ii5._..._s,i 0.-NE DR / E./ ( IMIM .X..41...1......... ■ i ! ;! ;it / ''\ 0 150 300 • 3 ^ tk4 1 -—4 , Soals In test .... .3' i . '•‘ i i - i 1 , sN, / -71-.....L</ 7 \< 4 . I i 1 I I \0\ / 1 1 I / i r-----..... -,\ ,A \?" / \s / ' V\ I i rikla' /IA 1-----.1 i --7,---- i - 1 .,----- * i i 1 ii4; 1 ; t i i . / / ! --....,1 i __ ITIT1111 , i 1 I Olf e I ? ? I * ! ! ? 1 I 1 1 1 : : : 1 1 , ; i L 5 : i , 1 ______„ , RAHN ROAD CEDAR GROVE No. 4 iii Bonestroo • fiosene 1111■111••• 11 Anderlik & EAGAN, MINNESOTA FIGURE 13 Associates STREET LIGHTING PROJECT No. 61 7R R08 OCTOBER 1992 COMM. 49519 • _—l t } Af 1N" T.>111 `....-- l -/ J Iil-D RUE QR. —I , • : 1 jIj i /; � } t__W} � • i i I 3 i+ I f f r AT - ; I d :� [ I f I � (?O. __ FAQ •i ---i L.---___Gx .,,,\ ,NQI LAIETRysr 1 : t t \ .• • 1 r -1 40. * 1 : i ,:cii: it 1 I . / it .t _ 1 l 4 r= ),. I 6 44.. 403 , ii.,.... 1 i-i_r---1 ' . -„, „ ,---1- ,, l 1' I' ' \ ........,,,,__, , , 1_,,1 �.,' . '' 3 t � S .j fi \� t, , : ,,,, f t✓-- 1 L—'C7 ! : : A.,.R r----T-W.F.....-,_ _ t Th fi 1-----r i CIN DD /�"`-`" ' CIS ,.. .r%f ' = F 1 .__...1 -----} ---1_4 f i } �t fi } 77*/ /------c ), x/CN,7 ti i E -----,,,k---„ii 1 /*-- , ,i," ..''''''Z'''''71 I I !"--,--,‘/ .74\,,.)91r>40 Na- '. ,i"--1L ---REr.„,,,,,, /1-----.../ 1-1 ..---1 . i______Y.„,,...)1116/\ .. \ "fx4:44: : i o sea. in feat soo T1I0ONfTE fife''''"" -o .. -� '1 ----T-\ ..t 1 - ( I i tat. °t -� H4WII J *.... _ CK i } fi I j { STREET LIGHT LOCATIONS } CEDAR GROVE No. 6 & 9 Bonestroo Rosene in EAGAN, MINNESOTA FIGURE 14 Anderlik b Associates STREET LIGHTING PROJECT No. 617R (4 \49\49519\49519F14 OCTOBER 1992 COMM. 49519 I 1 COMMERCIAL ROAD RESIDENTIAL ROAD INTERSECTION LIGHT STREET LIGHT BLACKHAWK ROAD RAHN ROAD NICLOLS ROAD CEDAR GROVE No. 3, 4, 5, 6 AND 9 Bonestroo Rosene Imo Andertik EAGAN, MINNESOTA FIGURE 14A LI Associates STREET LIGHT IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT No. 617R 4 6 49\49519\R12.DWG OCTOBER 1992 COMM. 49519 Storm Sewer- The existing storm sewer systems serving Cedar Grove No. 3, 4, 5, 6, and 9 were reviewed to determine their present capacity. In addition, the performance of the existing storm sewer system in each area was reviewed to determine if any major flooding has occurred since its construction. For the most part, the existing storm sewer systems have performed fairly well. However, as part of the recent Rahn Road Street Improvements,trunk storm sewer upgrades were made in Rahn Road anticipating future upgrades would be made when the streets in Cedar Grove No. 3 and 5 were reconstructed. Three proposed trunk storm sewer upgrades are presented on Figures No. 15 and 17. Each of these upgrades are considered trunk storm sewer improvements. In addition to the trunk storm sewer upgrades, it's also proposed to reconstruct all the existing catch basin structures and catch basin leads in each of the Cedar Grove Additions. Also presented on Figure No. 16, 17, and 18 are new storm sewer extensions proposed from the existing storm sewer systems in Cedar Grove No. 4, 5, 6 and 9. The storm sewer extensions are recommended to improve intersection drainage and provide greater inlet capacity into the storm sewer system. In addition, the upstream drainage area beyond the recommended storm sewer extension is approximately 5 acres which is an engineering standard for determining how far a storm sewer should extend into a drainage area. 49519r.rpt 24 // 1 I Hi: c- c," I / \ . ii 1 ., i / L \\._,( 1 i , i I 1 F-1 —7 `y----44•-• / i--s-... i , : i \,..1,../3/„AJAZACM ) / 1 :•INN. `""-- c ' T I 1—7-- ,,N(1.--.7.„1: 1/4--. ', \cil \ ‘ t k•-,,,,,_ : t...<9; / i ■ L 1 9,-."---'t . 31 I I ---'-'• ..-1 ' --Ji ; ui 1 ...i_-----'_•-_--- rm 1/2----? 's--„ i / ' 1.--, I 1 , $ i 1 i . / I/ i • ,, , I , ././... ._ ,..,...„j. c , —.,.........,_„„ / v i -_,...4,44 ., / i / ),,-- :,...-,.....3,4,„, , „ i i / \ / k'',,, i / )?.'-'')',• / '.. :" ..,,,,..4 f 1 1 1 I I ' ■,,,,,...z.„4., , / i / .,,,,,,,.. , .,,1 i I 14 f • • 1 / iii 1 i iss,,,.," / i i / / ' ---',-•.••••itr'',4 --•---.4 i • ----.i i f I f / .•........,. , 1 ,I / i , do i I 1 ' i 1 I 1 • I i ' I 7.-3(-1.......... 1 I i f 1 / ' UlilYr IA / ; i I 1 1 i 1 1 I / / / i AZ' I / i Iv Ex. 24" / i 1 1 t UPGRADE TO 36" , 1 4. / ' 1 • / / f 1 i / I NjI >,-,,,,, 0 200 400 iiainSQiel Soule In tad r--- • iiiCEDAR GROVE No. 3 Bonestroo 1 a Rosen. EAGAN, MINNESOTA FIGURE 15 VI Associates STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT No. 617R Engineers& Architects .2-- 2335 West Highway 36 tAinnesota 55119 K:\49\49519\RO5 OCTOBER 1992 COMM. 49519 St. Paul, i 1 Ex. 24" — Ex. 27". 43-- 'Ex. 42" t . 1 I , t .-- i MOCKS ROAD L _ I ' I 1 i 1 1 I , I I ia 1, I LIVING WORD ' i I I ERAN CHURCH I : ‘ ; .--....1 ).' I LUTH ,c.c04 DIOR i II 1 ...... , --i L -- 1,, 1,, Ex. 21 °Tr "4 ti. 3(t Ex. 3Z.@ 1 1 I / I 1 I 1 I ' 1 7 ° 111111111111. Ill < / 1 i I-- i I / ■ \ . i I I . ! i \ .„I ....,, .........._j *4 1-,, . r's 1 __,......... ti 1 N., \ ...,, / 1 le,,••'....2' • _Ir. illipt ....- 1.... , ,.0. .., . .,, NA I ! v r ...,- . r iks j 1( I , r gliel.. i :,.. ,..• ,-3 / .i 4 ..," i ./. , i 1/ i il ___If t J i ! i ,,/....„... , i• I PI • 1"-------/ I'\-,,,,,, 4 1... i • I , i I ‘ I 1 , I ' i ..................) — \ / 1' : ! '. ••.i - ., .,. ............._.-- • ' : ! \ \ Y / ._... , \ i 1 i i .1\ \ • . Ft' SANDSTONE" DR i -----)".-:\/ \ ....'"'-,„, '''''''''-- --a■- `6,.....*...............0. IC> i i li / \ , i / \ — 4 f , , i • £4, 3 -4 i / ..--- \,/ 0 150 300 li4">-- ..- I .- MEMNiMgii■i I J1 / Sods In fest -• -, 1 / , i ..\\ • i ■x I 1 ? '. T 1 -r 4. .. , , I --1 - >C, / , i ! t I , , 1 1 i N ■ '... <7.,,,................„ sli ! \' f (Ne4 1 i I -----('''. I „,....", r's-,--,,,,:t1 i / z ‘ i 1 NI E7 1 5"! I t / 1 1111 li i c„casZk .. 3 ! 1 , 3 i i 1 I i r_______1 ! i 1 -/------- RAHN ROAD CEDAR GROVE No. 4 ja Bonestroo fioeene ' Anderlik 6 EAGAN, MINNESOTA FIGURE 16 Associates STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT No, 617R z..5 DAC nr,rnr..rin •""•-• "PSI,II■1 •".1" a \ i I I _ ii I 1 1 E 0041 NEW 18"''0 ,4 UPGRADE TOl 30" To a 4 r ....„,,,, ._uj 4110111k 446Z11 i z i \ :- -•pr t . li , a \ I it". . ..4.:*dr4&vt4411lHIII!iki4111141111111111l411W11 - i w , , ,r \C)*' E TACONITE 7R1 I t \ V-1- B[u oNiE J \ 5 Ex. 72 ;o c. : * *al .....i DT- W 1 I _ i I i Z�^ t___-j i =PUMICE PT c FL� _ v J j ---.- , 1 CARNELIAN'IA L i I `Ex. 18" Ex. 27" ; 1 f i _ I CARN ...__. N 1 , i---- I �q�] , 1 1 1 JADE LA tx. 18" i r r JADE LAi L UPGRADE TO 314:. .,2PEP3Au r ° , N `:4y aoo goo In fent ti v „1 CEDAR GROVE No. 5 n Bonestroo Rosene •�— Anderiik& EAGAN, MINNESOTA FIGURE 17 Associates STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT No. 617R /cis' / Engineers& Architects 2995 Watt Highway 36 ! 49\49519\R06 OCTOBER 1992 COMM. 49519 i St. Paul, Minneaata 5511 ' s/ VD RUE DR , . -- _ F ; * —_J 1 liaiM00,.. : 140#°4 --- 'J a o 38 i k # \1 4 1 ' WIPP* . .. ',� �\ + i L_, . ., \ ,. V 'tliPAtir 1 c) —i € 1 '��10 ' -- I 1 f 1 s 02 , \ ,,,. / \,,--- .4.4/,...',.. . • ; /jr cif`" ,,,(� \-----------,/, t-----( t S _ 1`----ce`` € — i _ -- . i ' Z ;{ ` r t Jz � it CR5T4L DR s , - }- cire � ' J # f - �/N Y 1 t .k l• ‘` cA--_—_;44E11.1 ' \e, : ix. . . 5-o• ----! sti-j-,:- ), — 1 L",A,A.., k \ . . 1.4_7.-c> ci i , -._. f f �1 4. N E Z�— o s�o eoo ,./.....,,,,,, } _ rya--' , iiaeliii Sods In Mt _TACONITE/ ..._...ri : P4 i .. f \'T' E )t I n) i ?. V V S r.//t 'a�.1 4 _ L. F 1 i it - : f L._j_• CEDAR GROVE No. I CEDAR GROVE No. 6 & 9 iii Bonestroo Rosene In EAGAN, MINNESOTA FIGURE 18 Anderiik d Associates STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT No. 617R 45_, R09 OCTOBER 1992 COMM. 49519 t ' Sanitary Sewer and Water Service Reconstruct - Utility reconstruction includes minor improvements to the existing sanitary sewer and water system. These improvements include the removal of all 24" diameter sanitary sewer castings and replacing with new 27" diameter casting. The existing 27" diameter covers with pick holes will also be replaced with new :27" diameter covers with concealed pick holes . All existing gate valve boxes will be removed and replaced with new. In addition, many of the existing water shutoff valves serving each home are not properly working or can't be found. Therefore, it's proposed to repair all existing water shutoff valves which aren't working and locate those which can't be found and repair them if necessary. 49519r.rpt 29 6,C' COST ESTIMATE: A preliminary cost estimate is presented in Appendix A located at the back of this report which is summarized below: I. STREET A. Cedar Grove No. 3, 4, and 5 a) Street Improvement $1,366,300 b) Sand Stone Drive South of Shale Lane 20,750 c) Concrete Curb Improvements 973,120 B. Cedar Grove No. 6 & 9 a) Bituminous Street Improvements $ 399,250 b) Gold Trail (Dolomite Drive to Bue'D Rue Drive) 71,540 c) Repair Existing Concrete Curb 70,920 II. STREET LIGHTS 296,830 III. STORM SEWER 405,760 IV. SANITARY SEWER AND WATER REPAIR 186,200 TOTAL $3,790,670 The total estimated project cost is $3,790,670 which includes contingencies and indirect costs with the exception of street lights. Contingency costs are estimated at 10% while indirect costs are estimated at 35% which include legal, engineering, administration, and bond interest with the exception of street lights. Street light improvements are installed and owned by Northern States Power and Dakota Electric. Indirect costs for street lights are estimated at 20%. 49519r.rpt 30 �p°7 AREA TO BE INCLUDED: The area to be included for assessment purposes is presented on Figures No. 6, 7, 8, and 9 and are listed below: Parcel Description Number of Lots CEDAR GROVE NO. 3 Block 1, Lots 2-7 6 Block 2, Lots 1-24 24 Block 3, Lots 1-7 7 Block 4, Lots 1-10, 13-23 21 Block 5, Lots 1-20 20 Block 6, Lots 1-21 21 Block 7, Lots 1-16, 18-29 28 Block 8, Lots 4-10, 18-45 35 Total 162 CEDAR CREST Block 1, Lots 1-7 7 CEDAR GROVE NO. 4 Block 1, Lots 1-15, 27-31 20 Block 2, Lots 2-10 9 Block 2, Lot 1 1/2 Lot Equivalent Block 3, Lots 1-6, 15-26 18 Block 4, Lots 1-19, 39-41 22 Block 5, Lots 1-28 28 Block 6, Lots 1-11, 25-34 21 Block 6, Parcel 241-06 (Living Word Church) 10 Lot Equivalents Block 7, Lots 1-17 17 Block 8, Lots 1-45 45 Total 1901/2 Lot Equivalenis (continued on next page) 49519r.rpt 31 �j SE 1/4, SECTION 30 Parcel 010-75 Rahn Elementary School Parcel 012-76 Rahn Park CEDAR GROVE 5 Block 1, Lots 1-22 22 Block 2, Lots 1-19 19 Block 3, Lots 1-9 9 Block 4, Lots 1-8 8 Block 5, Lots 1-25 25 Block 6, Lots 1-22 22 Block 7, Lots 1-25 25 Block 8, Lots 1-5 5 Block 9, Lots 1-2 2 Block 10, Lots 1-23 23 Block 11, Lots 1-14 14 Block 12, Lots 1-9 9 Block 13, Lots 1-14 14 Total 197 Peridot Park (Outlot along Cinnabar Drive) 1 Lot Equivalent Woodhaven Park (Parcel 160-13) 4 Lot Equivalent CEDAR GROVE NO. 6 Block 1, Lot 1 1 Block 2, Lot 1-8 8 Block 3, Lots 1-18 18 Block 4, Lots 1-11 11 Block 5, Lots -9 9 Block 6, Lots 1-53 54 Block 7, Lots 1-12 12 Block 8, Lots 1-18 18 Block 9, Lots 1-11 11 Total 142 Woodhaven Park (Parcel 060-00, 021-00) Peridot Park (Outlot F) 2 Lot Equivalent (continued on next page) 49519r.rpt 32 /! CE,DAR GROVE NO. 9 Block 1, Lots 1-13 13 Block 2, Lots 1-15 15 Total 28 BALLANTRAE 1ST ADDITION Block 1, Lot 1-4 Block 2, Lot 3 Outlot A COUNTRYSIDE CONDOMINIUM NO. 48 MARELL'S 1ST ADDITION Block 1, Lot 1-3 49519r.rpt 33 74 ASSESSMENT: Assessments are proposed to be levied against the benefitted property in accordance with the City of Eagan's Assessment Policy for Street Reconstruction which is summarized below. A preliminary assessment roll is included in Appendix B located at the back of this report. All costs will be revised based on final project costs. Property type Residential/Duplex All Other Assessed CV Assessed Bituminous Street Reconstruction 75% 25% 100% 0% New Concrete Curb 100% 0% 100% 0% Repair Existing Concrete Curb 0% 100% 0% 100% Street Lights 100% 0% 100% 0% Storm Sewer 0% 100% 0% 100% Sanitary Sewer/Water Repair 0% 100% 0% 100% A summary of the cost/lot is listed below: Estimated Cost/Lot Cedar Grove Cedar Grove No. 3, 4, 5 No6 & 9 Bituminous Street Reconstruct $1,832 $1,826 New Concrete Curb 1,739 Previously Paid Street Lights 396 396 $3,967 $2,222 The homeowner will have the option at the time of the assessment hearing to pay the assessment in full following the assessment hearing or include the assessment as part of their property tax statement. If the assessment is included on the property tax statement, the assessment will be spread over a period of time and at an interest rate determined by the City Council. If the assessment is spread over a 15 year period at an 8% interest rate, the following payment schedule will result: 49519r.rpt 34 7/ I Assessment = $3,967 Principal Interest Cost Per Cost Per Per Year Per Year Year Month 1st Year $264 $317 $581 $48 15th Year 264 21 285 24 Assessment = $2,222 1st Year 148 $178 $326 $27 15th Year 148 12 160 13 REVENUE: A summary of revenue sources is listed below Project A) Cedar Grove No. 3, 4, & 5 Cost Revenue Balance 1. Bituminous Street Reconstruction $1,366,300 $1,024,725 $-341,575 2. Sandstone Drive South of Shale Lane 20,750 18,900 -1,850 3. New Concrete Curb 973,120 973,120 -0- B) Cedar Grove No. 6 & 9 1. Bituminous Street Reconstruction $399,250 $299,440 $-99,810 2. Gold Trail (Dolomite Drive to Bue 'D Rue Drive) 71,540 60,754 -10,786 3. Repair Existing Concrete Curb 70,920 - 0 - -70,920 C) Street Lights $296,830 $296,830 $ - 0 - D) Storm Sewer $405,760 $ - 0 - $-405,760 E) Sanitary Sewer/Water Repair $186,200 $ - 0 - $-186,200 TOTAL $3,790,670 $2,673,769 $1,116,901 49519r.rpt 35 77�� The anticipated project deficit is $1,116,901 which will be the responsibility of the major street fund and respective utility funds. In addition to the above City costs, Peridot, Woodhaven, and Rahn Park are proposed to be assessed for their front footage abutting the street improvement which is estimated and summarized below: Estimated Park Assessment Peridot Park $ 8,420 Woodhaven Park 57,447 Rahn Park 9,450 TOTAL $75,317 PROJECT SCHEDULE Present Feasibility Report November 5, 1992 Public Hearing December 1, 1992 Approve Plans & Specifications Winter 1993 Award Contract Spring 1993 Substantial Completion Fall 1993 Assessment Hearing Fall 1994 First Payment Due w/Property Tax Statement Spring 1995 49519r.rpt 36 /� APPENDIX A PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE CEDAR GROVE NO. 3, 4, 5, 6, & 9 STREET AND UTILITY RECONSTRUCTION PROJECT NO. 617R I. STREET A. CEDAR GROVE NO. 3, 4, & 5 a) Bituminow Street Reconstruction 134,000 S.Y. Remove bituminous pavement @ $1.50/sq.yd. $201,000 1,500 C.Y. Subgrade excavation @ $4.00/cu.yd. 6,000 2,000 C.Y. Select backfill @ $5.00/cu.yd. 10,000 23,070 TN Class 5 aggregate base @ $8.00/ton 184,560 13,100 TN Bituminous base course @ $13.00/ton 170,300 6,550 TN Bituminous wear course @ $14.00/ton 91,700 1,150 TN Bituminous material for mixture @ $130.00/ton 149,500 44 EA. Remove/reconstruct existing CB w/cstg @ $1,300/ea. 57,200 700 LF. 15" RCP storm sewer @ $24.00/1f 16,800 220 EA. Adjust MH/GV structure @ $150.00/ea. 33,000 Total $920,060 +10% Contingency 92,010 $1,012,070 +35% Indirect costs 354,230 TOTAL BITUMINOUS STREET IMPROVEMENTS $1,366,300 b) SANDSTONE DRIVE SOUTH OF SHALE LANE 2,100 S.Y. Remove bituminous pavement @ $1.50/sq.yd. $ 3,150 100 L.F. Remove concrete curb & gutter @ $2.50/If 250 120 TN Class 5 aggregate base w/excavation @ $8.00/ton 960 250 TN Bituminous base course @ $13.00/ton 3,250 125 TN Bituminous wear course @ $14.00/ton 1,750 22 TN Bituminous material for mixture @ $130/ton 2,860 100 GL Bituminous material for tack coat @ $1.50/gl. 150 100 L.F. Concrete curb & gutter @ $8.00/1f 800 3 EA. Adjust MH/GV structure @ $200/ea. 600 100 S.Y. Sod with topsoil @ $2.00/sq.yd. 600 $13,970 + 10% Contingency 1,400 $15,370 + 35% Indirect Costs 5,380 TOTAL SANDSTONE DRIVE SOUTH OF SHALE LANE $20,750 49.519rpt.app A - 1 c) New Concrete Curb Improvements 65,700 L.F. B618 concrete curb & gutter @ $5.00/1in.ft. $328,500 567 EA. Driveway restoration @ $400.00/ea• 222,800 2,000 C.Y. Topsoil borrow @ $8.00/cu.yd• 16,000 44,000 S.Y. Sod w/3" topsoil borrow @ $2.00/sq.yd. 88,000 Total $655,300 +10% Contingency 65.530 $720,830 +35% Indirect Costs 252,290 TOTAL CONCRL IE CURB IMPROVEMENTS $973,120 B. CEDAR GROVE NO. 6 & 9 a) Bituminous Street Reconstruction 38,000 S.Y. Remove bituminous pavement @ $1.50/sq.yd. $ 57,000 2,300 TN Class 5 aggregate base w/excavation @ $8.00/ton 18,400 4,600 TN Bituminous base course @ $13.00/ton 59,800 2,300 TN Bituminous wear course @ $14.00/ton 32,200 410 TN Bituminous material for mixture @ $130.00/ton 53,300 1,900 GL Bituminous material for tack coat @ $1.50/gal. 2,850 17 EA Remove/reconstruct existing CB w/cstg @ $1,300/ea. 22,100 300 L.F. 15" RCP storm sewer @ $24.00/lin.ft. 7,200 80 EA Adjust MH/GV structure @ $200.00/ea. 16,000 268,850 +10% Contingency 26,890 $295,740 +35% Indirect costs 103,510 TOTAL STREET IMPROVEMENTS $399,250 b) Gold Trail (Dolomite Drive to Beau 'D Rue Drive) 6,000 S.Y. Remove bituminous pavement @ $1.50/sq.yd. $ 9,000 400 TN Class 5 aggregate base @ $8.00/ton 3,200 800 TN Bituminous wear course @ $13.00/ton 10,400 400 TN Bituminous wear course @ $14.00/ton 5,600 70 TN Bituminous material for mixture @ $130/ton 9,100 300 GL Bituminous material for tack coat @ $1.50/gal. 450 5 EA. Remove/reconstruct existing CB w/cstg @ $1,300/ea. 6,500 80 L.F. 15" RCP storm sewer @ $24.00/Lin.ft. 1,920 10 EA. Adjust MH/GV structure @ $200/ea. 2,000 Total 48,170 + 10% Contingencies 4,820 52,990 + 35% Indirect Costs 18,550 TOTAL GOLD TRAIL (Dolomite Drive to Beau 'D Rue Drive) $71,540 49519rpt.app A - 2 �� c) Repair Existing Concrete Curb 3,500 L.F. Remove concrete curb & gutter @ $2.50/lin.ft. $ 8,750 3,500 L.F. Concrete curb & gutter @ $8.00/lin.ft. 28,000 20 EA Driveway repair @ $400/ea. 8,000 1,500 S.Y. Sod w/topsoil @ $2.00/sq.yd. 3,000 Total $47,750 + 10% Contingencies 4,780 $52,530 + 35% Indirect Costs 18,390 TOTAL REPAIR CONCRETE. CURB $70,920 II. STREET LIGHTING Lump Sum Cedar Grove No. 3 @ $88,090/L.S. $ 88,090 Lump Sum Cedar Grove No. 4 @ $87,665/L.S. 87,665 Lump Sum Cedar Grove No. 5 @ $34,600/L.S. 34,600 Lump Sum Cedar Grove No. 6 & 9 @ $37,000/L.S. 37,000 $247,355 +20% Indirect Costs 49,475 TOTAL STREET LIGHTING $296,830 III. STORM SEWER A. CEDAR GROVE NO. 3 1,170 L.F. Remove existing storm sewer @ $8.00/lin.ft. $ 9,360 1,170 L.F. 36" RCP storm sewer @ $47.00/lin.ft. 54,990 3 EA. Std. MH w/cstg @ $1,200/ea. 3,600 Total $ 67,950 +10% Contingencies 6,800 $74,750 +35% Indirect Costs 26,160 A. TOTAL STORM SEWER (C.G. No. 3) $100,910 49519rpt.app A - 3 . , B. CEDAR GROVE NO. 4 710 L.F. 18" RCP storm sewer @ $28.00/lin.ft. 19,880 350 L.F. 15" RCP storm sewer @ $24.00/lin.ft. 8,400 15 EA. Std. CB w/cstg. @ $1,200.00/ea. 18,000 $ 46,280 +10% Contingencies 4,630 $ 50,910 +35% Indirect Costs 17,820 B. TOTAL STORM SEWER (C.G. No. 4) $ 68,730 C. CEDAR GROVE NO. 5 600 L.F. Remove existing storm sewer @ $8.00/lin.ft. $ 4,800 300 L.F. 30" RCP storm sewer @ $40.00/lin.ft. 12,000 300 L.F. 27" RCP storm sewer @ $34.00/lin.ft. 10,200 1,200 L.F. 18" RCP storm sewer @ $28.00/lin.ft. 33,600 220 L.F. 15" RCP storm sewer @ $24.00/lin.ft. 5,280 10 EA. Std. CB w/cstg. @ $1,200.00/ea. 12,000 $77,880 +10% Contingencies 7,790 $85,670 +35% Indirect Costs 29,990 C. TOTAL STORM SEWER (C.G. No. 5) $115,660 D. CEDAR GROVE NO. 6, 9 1,880 L.F. 15" RCP storm sewer @ $24.00/lin.ft. 45,120 30 EA. Std. MH/CB w/cstg. @ $900.00/ea. 36,000 $ 81,120 +10% Contingencies 8,110 $89,230 +35% Indirect Costs 31,230 D. TOTAL STORM SEWER (C.G. No. 6, 9). $120,460 IV. SANITARY SEWER & WATER REPAIRS A. CEDAR GROVE NO. 3 37 EA. Furnish & install 27" dia. cstg. @$300.00/ea. $ 11,100 39 EA. Furnish & install curb stop & box @ $400.00/ea. 15,600 400 L.F. 1" Copper water service @ $14.00/lin.ft. 5,600 21 EA. Locate curb stop & box @$200.00/ea. 4,200 $ 36,500 +10% Contingencies 3,650 $ 40,150 +35% Indirect Costs 14,060 A. TOTAL CEDAR GROVE NO. 3 $ 54,210 49519rpt.app A - 4 77 • B. CEDAR GROVE NO. 4 49 EA. Furnish & install 27' dia. cstg. @ $300.00/ea. $ 14,700 55 EA. Furnish & install curb stop & box @ $400.00/ea. 22,000 550 L.F. 1" Copper water service @$14.00/lin.ft. 7,700 17 EA. Locate curb stop & box @ $200.00/ea. 3,400 $ 47,800 +10% Contingencies 4,780 $ 52,580 +35% Indirect Costs 18,400 B. TOTAL CEDAR GROVE NO. 4 $ 70,980 C. CEDAR GRQVE NO. 5 70 EA. Furnish & install 27" dia. cstg. @ $300.00/ea. $ 21,000 7 EA. Furnish & install curb stop & box @ $400.00/ea. 2,800 70 L.F. 1" Copper water service @ $14.00/lin.ft. 980 5 EA. Locate curb stop & box @ $200.00/ea. 1,000 $ 25,780 +10% Contingencies 2,580 $ 28,360 +35% Indirect Costs 9,930 C. TOTAL CEDAR GROVE NO. 5 $ 38,290 D. CEDAR GROVE NO. 6 & 9 51 EA. Furnish & install 27" dia. cstg. @ $300.00/ea. $ 15,300 $ 15,300 +10% Contingencies 1,530 $ 16,830 +35% Indirect Costs 5,890 D. TOTAL CEDAR GROVE NO. 6 & 9 $ 22,720 49519rpt.app A - 5 APPENDIX B PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL • ' CEDAR GROVE 3,4,5,6,&9 STREET AND IJrILII'Y RECONSTRUCTION-PROJECT NO.617R A) CEDAR GROVE NO.3,4,&5 a. Bituminous Street Improvement Parcel Description No.Lot Bituminous Concrete Street Light Total Lot Total Equivalents Street Curb Equivalent Assessment CEDAR GROVE NO.3 Cost Per Lot/Equivalent Block 1,Lots 2-7 6 $1,832(1) $1,739(2j $396(3) $3,967 23,802 Block 2, Lots 1-24 24 1,832 1,739 394 3,967 95,208 Block 3, Lou 1-7 7 1,832 1,739 394 3,967 27,769 Block 4, Lots 1-10, 13-23 21 _ 1,832 1,739 394 3,967 83,307 Block 5, Lots 1-20 20 1,832 1,739 394 3,967 79,340 Block 6, Lots 1-21 21 1,832 1,739 394 3,967 83,307 Block 7, Lots 1-16, 18-29 28 4832 1,739 394 3,967 111,076 Block 8, Lots 4-10, 18-45 _ 35 _ 1,832 1,739 _ 394 3,967 138%845 CEDAR CREST Block 1,Lots 1-7 1 7 I 1,832 1 1,739 1 394 I 3,967 1 27,769 CEDAR GROVE NO. 4 -Block 1, Lots 1-15, 27-31 20 1,832 1,739 394 3,967 79,340 Block 2, Lots 2-10 9 I,; 2 1,739 739 394 3,967 35 7, 03 Block 2, Lot 1 1/2 1 ' 2 1,739 394 3,967 0 Block 3, Lots 1-6, 15-26 18 1,832 1,739 394 3,967 71,406 Block 4, Lots 1-19, 39-41 22 1,832 1,739 394 3,967 87,274 Block 5, Lots 1-28 28 1,832 1,739 394 3,967 111,076 Block 6, Lots 1-11, 25-34 21 1,832 1,739 394 3,967 83,307 Block 6, Parcel 241-06 10 1,832 1,739 394 3,967 39,670 Block 7, Lots 1-17 17 1,832 1,739 394 3,967 67,439 Block 8, Lots 1-45 45 _ 1,832 4739 394 3,967 178,515 CEDAR GROVE NO.5 Block 1, Lots 1-22 22 $1,832 $1,739 $394 $3,967 87,274 Block 2, Lots 1-19 19 1,832 1,739 394 3,967 75,373 Block 3, Lots 1-9 9 1,832 1,739 394 3,967 35,703 I Block 4, Lots 1-8 8 1,832 1,739 394 3,967 31,736 Block 5, Lots 1-25 25 1,832 1,739 394 3,967 99,175 Block 6,Lots 1-22 22 1,832 1,739 394 3,967 87,274 Block Z Lots 1-25 25 1,832 1,739 394 3,967 99,175 Block 8, Lots 1-5 5 1,832 1,739 394 3,967 19,835 Block 10, Lots 1-23 23 1,832 1,739 394 3,967 91,241 Block 11, Lots 1-14 14 1,832 , 1,739 394 3,967 55,538 Block 12, Lots 1-9 9 1,832 1,739 394 3,967 35,703 Block 13, Lots 1-14 14 1,832 1,739 394 3,967 55,538 Peridot Park (Outlot) I 1,832 1,739 394 3,967 3,967 Woodhaven Park 4 1,832 1,739 394 3,967 15,868 U - 1 • 'I I (1) Rate equal 75% of bituminous street($1,024,725 = 0.75 x$1366,300) divided by number lot equivalents(559.5) (2) Rate equal 100% of concrete curb($973,120) divided by number lot equivalents(5595) (3) See Appendix C nsreapdel B- 1 7 ‘ c • b) Sandstone Drive South of Shale Lane SE Y. Section 30 Cost/Parcel Total Assessment Parcel 010-75 (Rahn School) $ 9,450 01) $9,450 Parcel 012-76 (Rahn Park) 9,450 $9,450 Total $18,900 (') Total cost assessed equally to Rahn School and Rahn Park does not include concrete curb 49519apdsB B - 2 S7° 4 • B) CEDAR GROVE NO 6 & 9 a. Bituminous Street Improvement No. Lot Bituminous Street Total Lot Total Parcel Description Equivalents Street Lights Equivalent Assessment Cedar Grove No. 5 Block 9, Lots 1-2 2 $1,826 (1) $396 (2) 2,222 4,444 Cedar Grove No. 6 1,826 Block 1, Lot 1 1 1,826 396 2,222 2,222 Block 2, Lots 1-8 8 1,826 396 2,222 17,776 Block 3, Lots 1-18 18 1,826 396 2,222 39,996 Block 4, Lots 1-11 11 1,826 396 2,222 24,442 Block 5, Lots 1-9 9 1,826 396 2,222 19,998 Block 6, Lots 1-53 54 1,826 396 2,222 119,988 Block 7, Lots 1-12 12 1,826 396 2,222 26,664 Block 8, Lots 1-18 18 1,826 396 2,222 39,996 Block 9, Lots 1-11 11 1,826 396 2,222 24,442 Peridot Park 2 1,826 396 2,222 4,444 (Outlot F) Cedar Grove No. 9 Block 1, Lots 1-13 13 1,826 396 2,222 28,886 Block 2, Lots 1-5 5 1,826 396 2,222 11,110 Total 164 299,440(1) 64,240 (1) Rate equals 75% of bituminous street ($299,440 = 0.75 x $399,250) divided by number lot equivalents (164) (2) See Appendix C 49519 a B - 3 p l ti b. Gold Trail (Dolomite Drive to Beau 'D Rue Drive) Bituminous Street Street Parcel Description Front Foot Cost/F.F. Cost/Parcel, Light (4) Assessment Lot Woodhaven Park (Parcel 060-00, 021-00) N/A N/A 35,770 (1) 5,935 $41,615 Ballantrae 1st Addition Block 1, Lot 1 85 $20.24 (2) 1,720 286 2,006 Block 1, Lot 2 (Duplex) N/A N/A 1,826 (3) 396 2,222 Block 1, Lot 3 (Duplex) N/A N/A 1,826 396 2,222 Block 1, Lot 4 (Duplex) N/A N/A 1,826 396 2,222 Block 2, Lot 3 313 20.24 6,335 1,052 7,387 Outlot A 32 20.24 648 107 755 Condominium No. 48 263.13 20.24 5,325 884 6,209 Mare11's 1st Addition Block 1, Lot 1 (Duplex) N/A N/A 1,826 396 2,222 Block 1, Lot 2 (Duplex) N/A N/A 1,826 396 2,222 Block 1, Lot 3 (Duplex) N/A N/A 1,826 396 2,222 Total 60,754 (1) Cost/Parcel for Woodhaven Park equals 'h street cost for Gold Trail Part b ($71,540 _ 2 = $35,770). (2) Front Foot Rate equals street cost for Gold Trail Part b ($71,540) divided by front foot for Part b (1,767.26 x 2 = 3,534.52 F.F.) = $20.24/F.F. (3) Cost/Parcel, Lot for duplex lots equals lot equivalent rate for bituminous street for Cedar Grove No. 6, 9. (4) See Appendix C. 49519,2pdaB B - 4 S// • r 3 APPENDIX C STREET LIGHT ASSESSMENTS 1. Street Light Cost = $296,830 Street Percentage Street Light Length of Total Cost Cedar Grove No. 3, 4, 5, 6, & 9 43,113 L.F. 96% $284,960 Gold Trail Part b 1,767 4 11,870 TOTAL 44,880 100 $296,830 A. Street Light Rate - Gold Trail Part b a) Gold Trail Street Light Rate per front foot equal Street Light cost ($11,870) divided by front feet (2 x 1767 L.F.) equal $3.36/F.F. b) Woodhaven Park Street Light Rate equal Gold Trail Street Light Cost divided in half equals $5,935. c) Front Feet Rate/F.F. Total Street Light Assessment Ballantrae 1st Addition Block 1, Lot 1 85 $3.36 $ 286 Block 2, Lot 3 313 3.36 1,052 Outlot A 32 3.36 107 Condominium No. 48 263.13 3.36 884 Woodhaven Park N/A N/A 5,935 TOTAL $8,264 d) Street Light Assessment to the 6 duplex lots equal the equivalent rate for Cedar Grove No. 3, 4, 5, 6, & 9. B. Street Light Rate - Cedar Grove No. 3, 4, 5, 6, & 9 Rate equal Street Light cost ($296,830 - $8,264 = $288,566) divided by number of lot equivalents (559.5 + 164 + 6 Duplex lots = 729.5) equals $396/lot equivalent. 49519.apxc C -1 05; ■ I ` i • 34 /28 34 /28 , Narrow 6' Narrow 6' 34'/32' — Narrow 2' �{ 1 d ;a} !I:17) r BLUESTON Cr "Jr ; / o 2 ; .�`\-- 34'/32'---� �" `�, J/147' Narrow 2' � it J, { t 4'F��v - 4A icZi 'o' 1de `3E' 34'/32' o 2' CARNE1JAN L4 Narrow 2 +t /4/2- a� 3 ``9pF /'�`I No,.4o 32, �� w 2, JaoF LA Ar'------ I 1 N0 700 = . In ,..R m LEGEND • 34/32 = Existing/Proposed Widths CEDAR GROVE No. 3 Bone at oo NEI s Anderlik6 EAGAN, MINNESOTA FIGURE A, - Associates STREET WIDTHS g Engin..r.8 Architacta 2335 West Highway 38 K:\49\49519\R13 NOVEMBER 1992 COMM. 49519 St. Paul. Minnesota 5511: N.. 1 I IL _ i NICOLS ROAD -, . i- SERVICE ROAD r--- - .._ • ■ i 1 i , i 1 i 1 LIVING WORD • \\ \ 1 ‘\ 34'/32' LUTHERAN CHURCH \ ! '•i'' \ \ Narrow 2' DIAMOND DR .1' 1 \ 1 I ■ i ! ( / I ! 1 , 1 / i -.... / ; ......_ ; 4; , 1 / 34'/28' // --..........., ., , , \ r.- Narrow 6' / / . , s, ,„ 1/ 7 /-----, --;. \„ri r COPPER Pr\i, NT,/ .. / / ,,,, , -' -------7 e ■/(Ni f / A , i / , , , •k : / / / / i I s: // V Fs 1/‘\e 4/ / / f + 1 / /in & /414 ri , / I .- - . . \\,\‘• 1 ' rn 1 I ! . /cr,4749 1*.) 'l • , -, s, ■ ....,•*''1 i,i i i''.,*s\s'',„i,..'t!::1 I i I i 1 .P O.4-Z It0....... .,_.......—....._-.-.-..-.------7 / / / , , • _ __ i ! , i z: "--- — —V- i SANDSTONE DR----\ / '1 ■ 34'/32' , ;: ,----, ■4 Narrow ' . , f \ ' ' . L.. -...t...,.. —-- / t kiVIP.• 1 l .. _C•1 ----------N\0 c,...... ". ........___x_am.,..-- i CV _ ----- , In Z " .\04..‘,)1‘.D. 0 130 300 \ , ■ 2 k. liamiirEsi , cep\ ,...,, sc. In fast `,............_--- rt, 0 I ei z (NO\' __ 341-128' .. Narrow 6' c'veC c le ., LEGEND 1 _,_ __ RAHN ROAD 34'/32' = Existing/Proposed Width CEDAR GROVE No. 4 iiii Bonestroo nom flosene in Anderlik & EAGAN, MINNESOTA FIGURE B Associates STREET WIDTHS --..5-- 49/49519/R18 NOVEMBER 1992 COMM. 49519 . , 41 32728' Narrow 4' z. ..--------1 rT\ i 1 1-57: „777,__________--- K-----------------N ar 4' ,- )"/ .5r2:-3"-- RO Na<rofs'`)&-•--\\--‘")' iCINI4kBAR CT. (--N -1'0-----4 , 15Cd b: c'• z 1•.) 1 z / -■0„.,(e ; 1 !t tv o 1. 1 / 4,.--s) I 1 i _ :t:) MICA 7R / 1 ____ V''I‘) . 32732' i i : -------- .. TACONITE ; 1 ■.<,/- I 1. / ;c:' \ \ \ .s BLLies704.,;,' N \ ' \I ■,,..:.s._2 i / \cA ZNJ 144 U -74 Tr% (■I Cc tr) 1-•i rr) Lcb4 Ni \ PUMICE PT r.r)44; •••■.... ! FLAT , ti .C.NI tl . I iN4 1 o ---, rn i Pr)1 iii CARNELIAN LA 32'/36' . CARNELLA Widen 4' TA-------' - -......_ JADE LA i L__ _ ,AtiM ADD - , --51.--, Ni .. . c?-1, uir,, 2,ailo mx, i 23. _ Scala la tam cx, -i, LEGEND 34/32 = Existing/Proposed Widths CEDAR GROVE No. 5 ki Bonestroo Rosen. , NON TN Anderlik& EAGAN, MINNESOTA FIGURE C Associates STREE WIDTHS 5:6 Engineers& Architects 2335 West Highway 36 49\49519\R13 NOVEMBER 1992 COMM. 49519 St. Paul, Minnesota 5511.