11/16/1992 - City Council Special MEMO TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCILMEMBERS
FROM: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES
DATE: NOVEMBER 16, 1992
SUBJECT: ADDITIONAL INFORMATION FOR NOVEMBER 17, 1992 CITY
COUNCIL MEETING
DEPARTMENT HEAD BUSINESS
B. Parks & Recreation Department
• Item 1. YMCA Cash Trailway Dedication--The City has received a letter from the YMCA
of Greater St. Paul requesting a deferment of fees until the full building permit is issued and
not at the time of the footing and foundation permit. The City Administrator has requested
input from the Chief Building Official. For a copy of the letter from the YMCA and Chief
Building Official Reid's response, refer to pages 20A through 20B.
The City Administrator is suggesting that the item be given consideration under Department
Head Business; however, if the length of time for the discussion intrudes on either Consent
or Public Hearings, this item be deferred to the first item of Old Business. Mr. Harry
Gallaher, representing the YMCA, has been told that the discussion may either be deferred
in part or its entirety to Old Business for the reason stated.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the request of the
YMCA to postpone building permit fees at the time of the footing and foundation permit
until such time as the full building permit is issued for the YMCA project at Opperman
Drive and Delaware Trail.
PUBLIC HEARINGS
E. Project 634, Cedar Grove 7th & Lakeside Estates Additions--Enclosed on page 43A is
a written objection recently received regarding the above-referenced final assessment
hearing.
OLD BUSINESS
A. Project 622,Cedar Industrial Park-Structural Overlay--Enclosed on pages 94A through
94C is a memo from the Director of Public Works pertaining to the objection submitted.
LEGISLATIVE/INTERGOVERNMENTAL AFFAIRS UPDATE
As an item to be included on the agenda under Legislative/Intergovernmental Affairs is a
letter, enclosed on pages 174A through 174B, from the City Administrator of Mendota
Heights regarding action that City Council has approved requesting that the State take steps
needed to open the Ayd Mill Road to all traffic during the time the Mendota Bridge is
under construction.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To consider a resolution similar to
action taken by the City of Mendota Heights regarding the opening of the Ayd Mill Road.
ADDITIONAL INFORMATIVE
INVER GROVE HEIGHTS/CITY COUNCILMEMBER BILL KLEIN
Councilmember Bill Klein of the city of Inver Grove Heights contacted the City
Administrator and expressed interest in holding a joint meeting with the two city councils
some time in the late winter or early spring of 1993. The City Administrators for both
communities will coordinated this meeting.
•
UNITED WAY CORRESPONDENCE
Enclosed on page /9g, is a copy of correspondence from the United Way of St. Paul
regarding the City of Eagan's contribution for the 1992/1993 United Way Campaign.
MONTHLY ACTIVITY/SCHOOL RESOURCE OFFICER
For Council's information, a copy of the monthly activity for September, 1992,for the School
Resource Officer is enclosed on pages /�9'through Chief of Police Geagan has
asked that this monthly log be kept of all activities and copies will be provided to the City
Council as they are received.
MVTA UPDATE
Enclosed on pages ova?through 2/4 is a copy of the Minnesota Valley Transit Authority
Update.
CORRESPONDENCE/SONRISE BOOKS AND FLORAL
Enclosed on pageD/7 is a copy of a letter that Sonrise Books and Floral sent to Miller and
Schroeder Investments objecting to Shinders as a possible tenant at the Crossings Shopping
Center which is located by Bakers Square Restaurant. •
MLC CORRESPONDENCE
Messerli and Kramer is moving from Bloomington to 1800 5th Street Towers in
Minneapolis. Enclosed on pages g2/f through a/ / is a copy of information Bob Renner
compiled regarding the suburban election results. Also enclosed on pages « through
2/ is correspondence that was sent to the League of Minnesota Cities regarding the
MLC's opinion as it pertains to the new LGA formula.
/S/ Thomas L. Hedges
City Administrator
City of
A,A • A A Mendota Heights
November 2, 1992
The Honorable Mayor Thomas Egan
City of Eagan
3830 Pilot Knob Road
Eagan, MN 55122
Dear Mayor Egan:
. As you know, the Mendota Bridge was recently closed for
repairs and is not expected to reopen until late 1994. This bridge
closing will cause a major inconvenience for many travelers from
northern Dakota County that travel to the northwest. The City of
Mendota Heights feels that opening the Ayd Mill Road or Short Line
connection between I-35E and I-94 in St. Paul would provide another
opportunity for these travelers and would greatly reduce the
pressure on other corridors.
The Mendota Heights City Council adopted the attached
Resolution at their October 20th meeting requesting that the State
take the steps needed to open Ayd Mill Road to all traffic during
the time the Mendota Bridge is shut down. We ask your support in
this request and suggest that your City consider a similar
resolution as well. Thank you.
Sincerely,
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
4140"--1‘10-k &Le-
Tom Lawell
City Administrator
MTL:kkb
Enclosure
cc: City Administrator Thomas Hedges
/741/9
1101 Victoria Curve •Mendota Heights, MN • 55118 452.1850
City of Mendota Heights
Dakota County, Minnesota
RESOLUTION NO. 92-71
RESOLUTION CONCERNING THE CLOSING OF THE MENDOTA BRIDGE
AND THE REOPENING OF THE AYDS MILL ROAD
WHEREAS, a significant number of Mendota Heights residents use the Mendota Bridge to
commute to and from their jobs in St. Paul,Minneapolis and elsewhere; and
WHEREAS, a significant number of Mendota Heights residents use the Mendota Bridge to
travel to St. Paul, Minneapolis and elsewhere for non-work related reasons; and
WHEREAS, there are approximately 24,000 vehicle trips per day on the Mendota Bridge; •
and
WHEREAS, the Mendota Bridge will be closed for two years for repair starting on or about
October 28, 1992; and
WHEREAS, the bridge closing will force these thousands of drivers to find alternate routes,
further congesting rush-hour traffic; and
WHEREAS, the Ayds Mill Road connection from I-35E to I-94 in St. Paul, Minnesota, has
proven to be a convenient and useful alternate route with a minimum of disruption to St. Paul
residents; and
WHEREAS, the Ayds Mill Road connection was closed shortly after the completion of the
Lafayette Freeway repair.
NOW THEREFORE IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Mendota Heights requests that the City of St. Paul and the Minnesota Department of Transportation
reopen the Ayds Mill Road connection from I-35E to I-94 for automobile and mass transit vehicles.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that our neighboring cities of West St. Paul, Inver Grove
Heights, Eagan, Lilydale and Mendota be invited to join in said petition.
•
Adopted by the Mendota Heights City Council this 20th day of October, 1992.
CITY COUNCIL
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
By llit.�.4 4
Charles E. Mertensotto, Mayor
A 0- T:
thleen M. Swanson, City Clerk
/ 7 B
IINovember 10, 1992
Mr. Dale Runkle
Director of Community Development
City of Eagan
3830 Pilot Knob Road
YMCA of Greater Eagan, Minnesota 55122-1897
Saint Paul
RE: Southwest YMCA
Opperman Drive and Delaware Trail
Eagan, Minnesota
General Office
194 6th St.East Dear Mr. Runkle:
St.Paul,MN 55101-1999
The YMCA has applied for a permit to construct the footing and
612-292-4100 foundations for our new Southwest YMCA facility located at
FAX 612-292-4148 Opperman Drive and Delaware Trail in Eagan. It is the intent of
the YMCA to start and complete this work yet this fall. The
on E.Lindquist documents for the full building permit will be submitted in 1993.
Chairman/CVO
John L Traver It is our understanding that Eagan has revised its policy over the
President/CEO past several years to require payment of the Metropolitan Waste
Water Commission Sewer Availability charge, Eagan Sewer
Availability charge, Eagan Water Treatment fee, Eagan Road Unit
fee, and Eagan Trail Dedication fee at the time a Footing and
BUBUILDING�1� Foundation Permit is issued rather than at the time the full
LDI T G building permit is issued. The cost of these fees on this project
FUTURES is considerable. They approach the value of the footing and
C/ 1tLi foundation work itself.
It would be a considerable benefit to the YMCA to pay for these
fees at the time the full building permit is issued and not at the
time the footing and foundation permit is issued. We, therefore,
request that the payment of the Metropolitan Waste Water
Commission Sewer Availability charge, Eagan Sewer Availability
charge, Eagan Water Treatment fee, Eagan Road Unit fee, and Eagan
Trail Dedication fee be deferred until the time the full building
permit is issued.
If it is necessary for this request to be presented to the City
Council, we request that it be presented at the November 17
Council meeting. We will be appearing before the Council that
• evening for the matters on this site.
Thank you for your consideration in this matter.
,S c=
411!PR. Shannon
Vice President/Facility Management
The YMCA is a Christian-values based organization that builds self-
2 O esteem,mutual respect and a stronger community for all through
QJ quality programs that enrich families,develop youth,enhance
health,and promote intercultural and global understanding.
MEMORANDUM
TO: TOM HEDGES, CITY ADMINISTRATOR
FROM: DOUG REID, CHIEF BUILDING OFFICIAL
DATE: NOVEMBER 5, 1992
RE: FOUNDATION PERMITS
It has been the policy of Protective Inspections that if there is a need for a foundation
permit, the department collects all City fees at the time the foundation permit is issued. •
This has reduced the request for foundation permits when in most instances, the entire
building permit could be issued. At one time the City issued foundation permits only at a
cost of $15.00 to $100.00 and did not collect any of the City fees. This was a huge cost
savings for the builder; however it created extra workload for City staff by having to type
and issue two permits for each building, transfer pertinent inspection information, and
double filing.
A review of past exceptions to this policy indicates that the last foundation permits issued
where all City fees were postponed for 90 days was in July 1991 on duplexes in The
Woodlands North Addition. This was agreed to by City staff because of the time needed
to change from a private to public contract for improvements. All other foundation permits
have been charged full City fees at the time of issuance. If the foundation permits extend
into the next year, then it becomes necessary to collect the next year's fees.
If you desire additional information, please advise.
Chief Bu'ding Official
DR/js
aoB
REceur-
NOV 16 t99
% %5( Linda M. Brokish
„Q%`%5(
1818 E. Bluestone Dr.
Eagan, Mn. 55122
6‘‘ ,Q November 04, 1992
City Clerk
City of Eagan
3830 Pilot Knob Road
Eagan, Minnesota 55122
I am hereby giving written objection to the proposed special
assessmant in regards to project #634 regarding streetlight
improvements.
First of all, I object to the statement in the letter that you
sent to me stating that this project was an improvement. I
reside within the area proposed to have the special assessment
of $50,945.00 for lights, and feel it is not an improvement in
any way. I did not wish to have these lights placed, and further-
more part of the reason that I moved to the area that I did was
because there were not any sidewalks to contend with or lights
to glare in my house at night.
The light is not on my property, I do not appreciate having the
light glaring into my bedroom at night from across the street, and
do not feel my safety or that of my children has ever been of a
concern to warrant the placement of the streetlights.
Although I am not 65 years old,fny imcome as a single parent
supporting two young children does not go far enough as it is,
much less allow for assessments I do not desire. I'm sure that
other residents in the area will find this to be a hardship on
their budgets as well.
0 I urge you not to amend this asssessment amount due, and perhaps
find another way to resolve this unwarranted streetlight project.
Sin rely,
"At G Ad&44a,...
Li da M. Brokish
/-13
MEMO TO: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
C/O THOMAS L. HEDGES, CITY ADMINISTRATOR
FROM: THOMAS A. COLBERT, DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS
DATE: NOVEMBER 16, 1992
SUBJECT: PROJECT 622, CEDAR INDUSTRIAL PARK (STREET RENOVATION)
FINAL ASSESSMENT OBJECTION (LOT 1, BLOCK 2,
CEDAR INDUSTRIAL PARK)
On November 5th, the public hearing was held to consider the adoption of the final
assessment roll for the above-referenced project. At that time, the attached written
objection was submitted by a representative of the J.P.K.Park Co. In presenting this written
objection, Mr. Parranto spoke to the several aspects of the objection as it pertains to lack
of notification of the public hearing processes, lack of communication regarding the actual
construction work to be performed, and the perceived lack of benefit from the
improvements
being assessed. Subsequently, the City Council continued the public hearing
until November 17th and directed staff to respond to these issues. I have met with Mr.
Parranto on Friday, November 13th to review and discuss in further detail his concerns and
objections. The following is a summary response for the Council's information.
NOTIFICATION PROCESS
The staff has researched the mailing list certified by the City Clerk that is used for the
public hearings notifications. In both mailings, the most current address was used for
notices being sent. While City staff did receive a few notices returned by the post office as
undeliverable, they did not include this particular parcel. The applicant has indicated that
the address listed should have been deliverable to his attention. In reviewing the audio tape
for the public hearing held on June 16th, the property owner indicated he received a notice
of the public hearing but not the informational meeting held on June 4th. The staff or
property owner cannot explain why some notices were not delivered and others were.
LACK OF CONSTRUCTION COMMUNICATION
After the objection to the proposed driveway aprons were raised at the public hearing, Mr.
• Parranto believed that the City staff would contact him and review his driveway entrance
in the field prior to construction. That has been the staff's normal operating procedure for
the previous project in the Eagandale Center Industrial Park as well as the proposed Cedar
Industrial Park improvement. Unfortunately,the order of driveway reconstruction scheduled
by the contractor was the complete opposite of our schedule of contacting the property
owners. Subsequently, while Mr. Parranto was one of the last property owners to have his
driveway situation reviewed by City staff, the contractor started at that location without our
knowledge. Subsequently, we did not have the opportunity to review the situation with Mr.
Parranto prior to construction commencing. The City staff regrets and apologizes for the
mistiming of this communication/construction schedule.
714/ fi
PAGE TWO
NOVEMBER 16, 1992
At the time of the original public hearing, it was stated that any driveway approach that did
not meet the current City standards would be reconstructed. It was confirmed that the
driveway approaches in question did not meet current City standards. However, the
property owner contends that, while they did not meet City standards, they were more than
adequate as a result of recent private parking lot improvements.
BENEFIT FROM IMPROVEMENTS
While the property owner recognizes the benefits associated with maintaining industrial
streets and upgrading them to a 10 ton per axle design capacity, the primary objection
pertains to the driveway aprons. A summary of the total assessments against this property
410
is identified as follows:
Driveway Driveway Streetlights Total Public Hearing
Improvement Apron Estimate
$ 5,748.17 $ 3,846.89 $ 1,242.85 $10, 837.91 $14,396.56
The property owner, being a certified appraiser, contends that there is no financial benefit
associated with the driveway apron improvements and is requesting that they be removed
and deleted from the final assessment roll. If the City does not concur with that request,
he has indicated his intentions to pursue the question of benefit as it pertains to the entire
assessment. In reviewing the objection/appeal process with the City attorney's office, It is
estimated that approximately $2,000 could be spent in formal appraisals and legal fees in
defending an official appeal action.
SUMMARY
The property owner is continuing to pursue his objection based on lack of value increase
to the property. The objection will be withdrawn if the assessment associated with the
driveway aprons is removed. The following are two options available for consideration by
the City Council:
1. Amend the final assessment roll for Project #622 (Cedar Industrial Park-Street •
Overlay) by reducing the assessment to Lot 1, Block 2, Cedar Industrial Park from
$10,837.91 to $6,991.02 and authorize the certification to Dakota County.
96(
PAGE THREE
NOVEMBER 16, 1992
2. Adopt the final assessment roll for Project #622 (Cedar Industrial Park-Street
Overlay) as presented, authorize its certification to Dakota County and the initiation
of the appraisal process in anticipation of a formal appeal as it pertains to Lot 1,
Block 2, Cedar Industrial Park.
i
Respectfully submitted
cc: Michael P. Foertsch, Assistant City Engineer
Gene VanOverbeke, Director of Finance
TAC/jf
•
/./e---
United Way of the Saint Paul Area
Yom, 166 Fourth Street East,Suite 100, St. Paul, MN 55101-1448 ----1' 612/291-8321 FAX 612/291-8353
I.
NOV 2 i992 , 1
p ,✓
October 30, 1992
Tom Hedges
3830 Pilot Knob Road
Eagan, MN 55122
Dear Mr. Hedges:
I know I speak for the thousands of local people who will be
helped by United Way services when I thank The City of Eagan's
employees for their pledges of $1585.25. These gifts will be
used responsibly to provide:
* food and shelter to families unable to provide for
themselves
* in-home services to the elderly so they can remain
independent in their own homes
* early childhood development programs
* job training to help people find employment and become
financially independent
* counseling programs that help families resolve their crises.
Your gifts ensure continued support for 224 programs serving
people in Dakota, Ramsey and Washington counties. The City of
Eagan's commitment to our community's campaign reflects the
dynamic community spirit unique to the East Metro area.
I commend Kim Eggers for her outstanding efforts in coordinating
your employee campaign. Her leadership and commitment were
important in contributing to the success of the campaign.
I encourage you and Kim to join me and other community volunteers
for a grand campaign celebration on Thursday, November 5.
Thank you again for your generous contribution and support.
Sincerely,
"lit. biTtk/C‘A
J m Conklin
1992 Loaned Executive
City of St. Paul
cc: Kim Eggers
eettnet / 7g /4
EAGAN HIGH SCHOOL •
DAKOTA HILLS
MIDDLE SCHOOL
SCHOOL RESOURCE OFFICER
MONTHLY ACTIVITY
SEPTEMBER 1992
•
l � �
SUMMARY
THIS MONTHLY REPORT SUMMARIZES THE FIRST MONTH OF ACTIVITY AT EAGAN
HIGH SCHOOL/DAKOTA HILLS MIDDLE SCHOOL. THE FIRST MONTH OF SCHOOL
CAN PROVE TO BE A CHALLENGE TO ALL INVOLVED IN THE EDUCATION
PROCESS, AND AS I FOUND, THIS APPLIES TO THE SCHOOL RESOURCE
OFFICER AS WELL.
I ENTERED THE TWO SCHOOLS PRIOR TO THE STUDENTS FIRST DAY OF
SCHOOL, AND THIS PROVED BENEFICIAL. THESE TWO WEEKS ALLOWED ME TO
SET UP AN OFFICE WITHIN THE HIGH SCHOOL, AND MORE IMPORTANTLY,
ALLOWED ME MEET THE FACULTY AND STAFF OF BOTH SCHOOLS. AS THE
SCHOOL YEAR MOVES INTO THE SECOND MONTH , I AM CONTINUALLY
IMPRESSED WITH THE COOPERATION THAT IS SHARED BETWEEN THE FACULTY
AND THE SCHOOL RESOURCE OFFICER. WITHOUT THIS RELATIONSHIP, THIS
• PROGRAM COULD NOT REACH THE SUCCESS THAT IT HAS REACHED THIS EARLY.
AS THIS RELATIONSHIP CONTINUES TO BUILD, I CAN ANTICIPATE THAT MANY
OF OUR SHARED CONCERNS AND GOALS WILL BE MET.
A SHARED CONCERN IN BOTH SCHOOLS IS THE ISSUE OF WORKING WITH THE
STUDENTS, GIVING THEM THE TOOLS AND RESOURCES NECESSARY TO RESOLVE
CONFLICTS WITHOUT VIOLENCE. IN THE FIRST MONTH I HAVE BECOME
INVOLVED WITH MANY CONFLICTS IN BOTH SCHOOLS, THAT HAVE ESCALATED
TO VIOLENCE . IN ALL OF THESE INSTANCES, A PEACEFUL SOLUTION TO THE
PROBLEM COULD HAVE BEEN WORKED OUT IF THE INVOLVED STUDENTS WOULD
HAVE STEERED AWAY FROM THE CONFLICT EARLY ENOUGH. IN THESE
INCIDENTS, I AM FINDING THAT POLICING THE SCHOOL CAMPUS IS VERY
SIMILAR TO THE POLICING THAT WE HAVE BECOME ACCUSTOMED TO, THAT IS
WORKING WITH FIVE PERCENT OF THE PEOPLE NINETY PERCENT OF THE TIME.
THE FACULTY AT BOTH SCHOOLS, AS WELL AS MYSELF ARE INTERESTED IN
TAKING A MORE PROACTIVE APPROACH TO THIS ISSUE, AND WE WILL BE
MEETING ON A REGULAR BASIS TO ADDRESS THIS.
AS MENTIONED EARLIER IN THIS REPORT, I HAVE SPENT A GREAT DEAL OF
TIME IN THE CLASSROOMS AT DAKOTA HILLS MIDDLE SCHOOL. I FEEL THAT
I HAVE BEEN RECEIVED VERY WELL BY THE STUDENTS, AS WELL AS THE
TEACHERS. DURING THE YEAR I PLAN TO SPENT TIME IN THE
HOMEROOM/ACTIVITY PERIOD ON AN INFORMAL BASIS, TALKING WITH THE
STUDENTS AND THE TEACHERS. I ANTICIPATE A GREAT DEAL MORE OF
CLASSROOM TIME AT THE HIGH SCHOOL, ONCE I MEET WITH THE FACULTY AT
A MEETING LATER THIS WEEK. I HAVE BEEN APPROACHED BY MANY EHS
TEACHERS ALREADY, HOWEVER MY MATERIAL WILL FIT INTO THEIR
CURRICULUM LATER DURING THE TRIMESTER.
I AM IMPRESSED AT THE RELATIONSHIPS I HAVE DEVELOPED THIS EARLY
WITH MANY OF THE STUDENTS. I WAS SURPRISED THE NUMBER OF AT RISK
STUDENTS THAT SOUGHT ME OUT DURING THE FIRST MONTH, COMING TO MY
OFFICE WITH INTELLIGENCE, AS WELL AS PROBLEMS THEY ARE HAVING ON
CAMPUS. THESE RELATIONSHIPS CONTINUE TO BUILD, AND THEY WILL PROVE
BENEFICIAL TO THE SCHOOL RESOURCE OFFICER POSITION ON THIS CAMPUS.
oo
IN CLOSING, THIS FIRST MONTH WAS A SUCCESS. I LOOK FORWARD TO
BUILDING THE SCHOOL RESOURCE OFFICER POSITION ON THE EHS/DHMS
CAMPUS, AND LOOKING BACK THROUGH MY NOTES AND SUMMARY, I FEEL THAT
THE SRO IS A MUCH NEEDED ADDITION TO THE FACULTY/STAFF AT BOTH
SCHOOLS. AS THE SCHOOL YEAR PROGRESSES, I INTEND TO SHARE SOME OF
MY GOALS THAT I BELIEVE ARE NECESSARY AND BE REACHED ON BOTH
CAMPUSES, HOWEVER IF THESE GOALS ARE SET THIS EARLY, IT MAY BE
PREMATURE. AS I GET MORE CONFIDENT AND FAMILIAR WITH THE NEW
POSITION AND MY SURROUNDINGS, THE PRIORITY OF THESE GOALS MAY
CHANGE AND OTHERS MAY BE MADE.
i
4
•
PRESENTATIONS
WEDNESDAY SEPTEMBER 2, 1992
DAKOTA HILLS MIDDLE SCHOOL FACULTY
I PRESENTED THE GOALS AND STRATEGIES OF THE SCHOOL RESOURCE OFFICER
TO THE FACULTY AND STAFF. 130 PEOPLE
EAGAN HIGH SCHOOL COORDINATOR MEETING
I PRESENTED THE SAME INFORMATION 15 PEOPLE
THURSDAY SEPTEMBER 3, 1992
EAGAN HIGH SCHOOL NINTH GRADE ORIENTATION
SAME INFORMATION AS ABOVE TO NINTH GRADE STUDENTS AND THEIR PARENTS
800 PEOPLE
WEDNESDAY SEPTEMBER 15, 1992
DAKOTA HILLS MIDDLE SCHOOL
DECISION MAKING/PROBLEM SOLVING 7TH GRADE 30 STUDENTS
THURSDAY SEPTEMBER 16, 1992
DAKOTA HILLS MIDDLE SCHOOL
DECISION MAKING/PROBLEM SOLVING 7TH GRADE 30 STUDENTS
THURSDAY SEPTEMBER 17, 1992
EAGAN HIGH SCHOOL
SELF DEFENSE ISSUES/USING COMMON SENSE 30 STUDENTS
THURSDAY SEPTEMBER 17, 1992
DAKOTA HILLS MIDDLE SCHOOL
DECISION MAKING/PROBLEM SOLVING 7TH GRADE 30 STUDENTS
THURSDAY SEPTEMBER 17, 1992
EAGAN POLICE DEPARTMENT EXPLORER POST
RECRUITMENT DRIVE 30 PEOPLE
WEDNESDAY SEPTEMBER 30, 1992
DAKOTA HILLS MIDDLE SCHOOL
SHOPLIFTING 8TH GRADE
TWO PRESENTATIONS 60 STUDENTS
THURSDAY OCTOBER 1, 1992
DAKOTA HILLS MIDDLE SCHOOL
SHOPLIFTING 8TH GRADE 30 STUDENTS
FRIDAY OCTOBER 2, 1992
DAKOTA HILLS MIDDLE SCHOOL
SHOPLIFTING 8TH GRADE 30 STUDENTS
ao �--
MONDAY OCTOBER 5, 1992
DAKOTA HILLS MIDDLE SCHOOL
SHOPLIFTING 8TH GRADE 30 STUDENTS
MONDAY OCTOBER 5, 1992
EAGAN HIGH SCHOOL
SITE COUNCIL MEETING/SRO GOALS AND ACTIVITY 10 PEOPLE
WEDNESDAY OCTOBER 7, 1992 41
DAKOTA HILLS MIDDLE SCHOOL
CRITICAL ISSUES 7TH GRADE 30 STUDENTS
14 TOTAL PRESENTATIONS
1285 TOTAL AUDIENCE
c>20
CASES WORKED
WEDNESDAY AUGUST 26, 1992
CRIMINAL SEXUAL ASSAULT AT EAGAN HIGH SCHOOL. VICTIM AND SUSPECT
INTERVIEWED. NO CHARGES.
TUESDAY SEPTEMBER 8, 1992
RECOVERED $150 STOLEN PROPERTY FROM A EAGAN HIGH SCHOOL
STUDENT(RADAR DETECTOR) AND RETURNED TO OWNER. NO CHARGES.
THURSDAY SEPTEMBER 10, 1992
RECOVERED A POLICE BADGE FROM A EAGAN HIGH SCHOOL STUDENT, AND
RETURNED IT TO THE MAPLE GROVE MI . POLICE DEPARTMENT. NO CHARGES.
MONDAY SEPTEMBER 14, 1992
HARASSING PHONE CALLS. EHS STUDENT AND HER FATHER REPORTED OTHER
STUDENTS ARE MAKING HARASSING AND THREATENING PHONE CALLS TO THEIR
HOME. FOLLOW UP WITH SUSPECT STUDENTS. CASE OPEN.
MONDAY SEPTEMBER 14, 1992
FOLLOW UP ON ASSAULT DHMS BUS SEPTEMBER 11, 1992 .
8TH GRADE STUDENT REFERRED TO JUVENILE COURT, FIFTH DEGREE ASSAULT.
MONDAY SEPTEMBER 14, 1992
FOLLOW UP ON DAMAGE TO PROPERTY THAT OCCURRED ON SEPTEMBER 11,
1992 . SUSPECTS WERE IDENTIFIED. NO CHARGES
FRIDAY SEPTEMBER 18, 1992
ASSAULT EHS. ONE JUVENILE MALE REFERRED TO COURT FOR 3RD DEGREE
ASSAULT CHARGES, ANOTHER FOR FIFTH DEGREE ASSAULT, AND A THIRD FOR
DISORDERLY CONDUCT/GIVING FALSE NAME AND DATE OF BIRTH TO POLICE.
THURSDAY SEPTEMBER 24, 1992
CRIMINAL SEXUAL CONDUCT DHMS . REFERRED TO BURNSVILLE POLICE
DEPARTMENT.
THURSDAY SEPTEMBER 24, 1992
ALCOHOL VIOLATION/POSSIBLE CHILD NEGLECT DHMS. TWO SEVENTH GRADE
STUDENTS WARNED FOR POSSESSION OF ALCOHOL. DAKOTA COUNTY CHILD
PROTECTION ADVISED OF POSSIBLE NEGLECT ON ONE OF THE STUDENTS .
0 FRIDAY OCTOBER 2, 1992
SCHOOL BUS STOP ARM VIOLATION EHS. STUDENT VERBALLY WARNED FOR
DISOBEYING CROSSING GUARD FLAG AT EHS.
MONDAY OCTOBER 5, 1992
EHS STUDENT CITED FOR POSSESSION OF ALCOHOL. FACULTY FOUND BOTTLE
OF BACARDI IN HIS LOCKER.
TUESDAY OCTOBER 6, 1992
RECOVERED STOLEN AM/FM CASSETTE FROM EHS STUDENT. IT WAS FOUND IN
HIS LOCKER, AND HE CANNOT EXPLAIN WHERE HE GOT IT. CASE OPEN.
0
TRAINING
WEDNESDAY AUGUST 26, 1992
SEXUAL HARASSMENT IN THE SCHOOLS. I ATTENDED A SEMINAR WITH SCHOOL
DISTRICT ADMINISTRATORS. THE MATERIAL WAS PRESENTED BY A SCHOOL
DISTRICT ATTORNEY, AND COVERED REPORTING, PREVENTING, AND
RECOGNITION OF SEXUAL HARASSMENT/ASSAULTS
IN THE SCHOOL.
FRIDAY SEPTEMBER 11, 1992
ASIAN GANG INVESTIGATORS INFORMATION EXCHANGE. I ATTENDED THIS
EIGHT HOUR SEMINAR WITH 100 OTHER LAW ENFORCEMENT PERSONAL. TRENDS
IN ASIAN CRIME WERE DISCUSSED, AS WELL AS ASIAN GANG INTELLIGENCE
AND ASIAN CULTURAL AWARENESS.
THURSDAY SEPTEMBER 17, 1992 •
ANNUAL CRIMINAL LAW UPDATE. THIS IS A ANNUAL FOUR HOUR REVIEW OF
THE CURRENT LAW CHANGES, AND RECENT SUPREME CASE LAW, AS IT APPLIES
TO LAW ENFORCEMENT. PRESENTED BY THE DAKOTA COUNTY ATTORNEY' S
OFFICE.
THURSDAY OCTOBER 1, 1992
INTOXILYZER OPERATOR REFRESHER. A FOUR HOUR STATE MANDATED
REFRESHER FOR INTOXILYZER OPERATORS. THE INTOXILYZER IS THE
INSTRUMENT USED BY POLICE OFFICERS TO MEASURE ALCOHOL CONTENT IN
SUSPECTED DRUNK DRIVERS .
TUESDAY OCTOBER 6, 1992
STREET GANG RECOGNITION. A TWO HOUR PRESENTATION BY MINNEAPOLIS
POLICE DEPARTMENT ON STREET GANG RECOGNITION.
20 HOURS TOTAL TRAINING
dos
ASSISTS
STAFF 34
ALL CONFERENCES, CONVERSATIONS, AND MEETINGS WITH FACULTY AND STAFF
WHERE INFORMATION IS SHARED AND REFERRALS ARE MADE.
STUDENTS 38
SAME AS ABOVE, ONLY WITH EAGAN HIGH SCHOOL/DAKOTA HILLS MIDDLE
SCHOOL STUDENTS . DOES NOT INCLUDE PRESENTATIONS.
PARENTS 17
ALL CONVERSATIONS, MEETINGS, AND REFERRALS, IN PERSON AND ON THE
TELEPHONE WITH PARENTS OF EHS/DHMS STUDENTS.
POLICE/OTHER AGENCIES 18
INCLUDES ALL INFORMATION THAT IS SHARED WITH EAGAN POLICE
DEPARTMENT, AS WELL AS REQUESTS FOR INFORMATION FROM OTHER POLICE
DEPARTMENTS, AND OTHER HUMAN SERVICE AGENCIES.
THESE STATISTICS REFLECT THE INFORMATION THAT I KEEP. AS THE
SCHOOL YEAR CONTINUES I WILL BE MONITORING MY METHODS OF KEEPING
THESE STATISTICS, AND MAKING MODIFICATIONS TO ENSURE THE ACCURACY
AS NEEDED.
O6
OCTOBER 30, 1992
TO: MVTA
FROM: Beverley Miller
SUBJECT: Directors Report Current Activities
1. Minnesota Valley Transit Authority received the Transit System of the Year award at
the annual Minnesota Public Transit Conference held on October 28, 1992. This award
is given to the organization which has demonstrated achievement in efficiency and
effectiveness; including reports on ridership, cost, safety, maintenance proficiency,
agency policy and administration and the organization's achievement of it's goals and
objective. MVTA staff have planned an appreciation day at South Garage with the MTC
drivers and staff.
2. MnDOT let an emergency contract and within 4 days re-stripped the Yankee Doodle
Park/Ride lot adding approximately 67 spaces to the lot. With the recent changes in
service on route 77E, this lot has become increasingly near capacity. With the closing
of the Mendota Bridge, we believe ridership from this lot will continue to grow.
3. The RTB has taken a "wait and see" attitude toward a proposed regional increase in
bus fares. Several examples including cost containment measures to be implemented by
the MTC, new federal funding for 1-394 transit service, and additional funding from the
legislature were cited as reasons for the delay. A decision is now expected in March,
1 993.
4. MnDOT has developed five transportation funding scenarios for consideration by the
public and policy makers. These scenarios indicate the level of state investment that is
needed to attain each option. This information will receive considerable attention in the
upcoming legislative session.
5. MVTA has awarded the contract for Cedarvale Park/Ride lot improvements to Pine
Bend Paving, Inc. They submitted a bid for $25,927, or the lowest responsive bid. The
site has already been staked, we are optimistic the work can be completed before
Thanksgiving.
6. I plan to attend a seminar at the Earle Brown Continuing Education Center on
November 9 and 10 entitled Effective Contract Administration.
•
2ô7 7
tl`‘NN rq Minnesota
t Department of Transportation
Transportation Building
�o, I 395 John Ireland Boulevard
4,,. Ta Saint Paul, Minnesota 55155
October 28 , 1992
Dear Transportation Stakeholder:
• Thank you for your support of Minnesota's multi-modal
transportation system. Attached you will find a copy of a
letter recently sent to Minnesota legislative leaders by
Transportation Commissioner Jim Denn. The commissioner's
letter outlines the educational effort Mn/DOT has undertaken
to inform policy makers and the public about transportation
options facing Minnesota. Specifically, the letter
describes five transportation scenarios developed by Mn/DOT
that describe different potential transportation futures for
our state.
I urge you to review these scenarios and become familiar
with their assumptions, guiding premises and transportation
outcomes. Mn/DOT firmly believes that a fully informed
citizenry will lead to sound decisions on the future of
transportation in Minnesota.
erely,
� l
Bob McFarlin
Director, Public Affairs
C>2 02
An Equal Opportumtu Emploucr
ewEs°4 Minnesota
'ib Department of Transportation
Transportation Building
4iSr 395 John Ireland Boulevard
4>op Tam Saint Paul, Minnesota 55155
October 1, 1992
Dear •
As we approach the 1993 legislative session, Minnesota is
facing a number of significant decisions, including how to
deal with severe budgetary problems and also how to resolve •
some very important policy issues. One issue certainly
headed for much debate is the adequacy of Minnesota's
transportation system, both as it exists today and what it
should be in the future.
As one of the primary transportation caretakers in the
state, Mn/DOT has an obligation to provide accurate and up-
to-date information on the transportation system. Over the
past few months, Mn/DOT has worked hard to identify, and
subsequently quantify, the condition of Minnesota's existing
system. The process we have followed has involved
significant input from transportation providers across the
state, including local governments and state wide transit
agencies.
As a means of helping the public better understand this
information, Mn/DOT has developed five "transportation
scenarios. " These scenarios are specific points on a broad
spectrum of transportation infrastructure options and
related funding needs. The extremes of the spectrum may
appear radical to some. At one end is the scenario of no
state transportation funding increase through the end of the
decade. The scenario at the other extreme is based on the
level of funding needed to develop the top highway system in
the region.
The specific scenarios are briefly outlined in the attached
material, along with a general description of the current
transportation funding situation in Minnesota. I urge you
to review these scenarios and acquaint yourself with the
issues, assumptions, options and raw financial information
on which they are based.
An Equal Opportunitu Employer
Transportation Scenario Letter
9/25/92 pg. 2
Mn/DOT has the responsibility to build and maintain a safe
and efficient state wide transportation system. Mn/DOT is
not in the business of setting transportation policy. Our
educational effort recognizes that it is up to the citizens
of Minnesota and their elected officials to collectively
decide, based on the facts presented, what level of
transportation service and investment Minnesota should have.
Over the coming months, Mn/DOT will be talking with
citizens, elected officials, media and other interested
parties to inform them of our findings. Decisions regarding
the future of Minnesota's transportation system will then be
based on input from an informed public which has had an
opportunity to review the best available information.
Governor Carlson most assuredly recognizes the importance of
a sound transportation system to the state's economy and
overall quality of life. He has encouraged Mn/DOT to begin
this state wide educational effort so that as many people as
possible are informed of our transportation situation. Our
goal is to provide the factual information needed to
encourage informed debate and develop sound transportation
policies.
To facilitate this effort, I would like to offer the
opportunity to have Mn/DOT staff meet with you or your
designated staff to discuss this information. We will be
contacting your office in the near future to follow up on
this offer.
Should you have any questions or concerns in the meantime,
please feel free to contact my office. Thank you for your
interest in this very important matter.
Si erely,
a Denn
Co 'e ioner
c -/O
Ir\NNESOt
Do
PF:o"--< Minnesota Department of Transportation
� Transportation Building, St. Paul, MN 55155
OF TFi''
MINNESOTA TRANSPORTATION SCENARIOS
Information Provided by the MN Department of Transportation
Fall/Winter 1992-93
CURRENT FUNDING (FY 1992)
In fiscal year 1992 , approximately $1. 3 billion in state and
federal transportation dollars were available to Minnesota
for state and local road systems and 'greater-Minnesota
transit programs. Of that total, Mn/DOT directly received
$831 million, counties received $290 million, local
municipalities received $94 million, and the remainder went
to other uses or state agencies.
In fulfilling its responsibilities, Mn/DOT spent its FY 92
budget in five general categories: the annual state
construction program ($410 million) , construction
engineering ($67 million) , design engineering ($58 million) ,
maintenance and customer support ($195 million) , and
aeronautics, Greater-Minnesota transit and other
transportation areas ($102 million) .
The current level of investment supports approximately
17, 000 private sector jobs that are dependent on highway
construction. On an average annual basis, Mn/DOT is able to
provide for the resurfacing and reconditioning of 460 miles
of state highway, the reconstruction of 140 miles of state
highway, and the repair or replacement of 90 deficient state
bridges.
These specific highway construction activities allow Mn/DOT
to maintain a 105 year rebuilding cycle for the state
highway system, far below the "best case" cycle of 50 years.
This means the state's highway infrastructure is
deteriorating at a rate faster than the state is able to
repair and rebuild.
Furthermore, at current funding levels, transit services are
provided county-wide in 36 greater-Minnesota counties, with
limited service provided in 23 others. State-supported
transit services remain unavailable in 21 greater-Minnesota
counties . A long term transportation goal for Minnesota is
to provide appropriate transit services in all 87 counties.
•=2//
An Equal Oppariumir Enrplover
Transportation Scenarios
pg. 2
FUNDING SCENARIOS
Deteriorating Infrastructure (FY 94-25 & FY 94-2000) : This °
scenario describes the impacts on the state's transportation
system of no state transportation funding increase in the
next biennium and through the end of the decade. In
general, the state's transportation system would deteriorate
at a rate significantly faster than the state would be able
to repair and rebuild.
For the FY 94-95 bi'e
nnium alone:
$65 million per year in
state highway construction projects would be deferred;
Mn/DOT would shift emphasis from construction activities to
maintenance activities in order to maintain the integrity
and safety of the system; the rebuilding cycle for state
highways would increase from the current 105 years to more
than 110 years; the state's goal of providing transit
services in all 87 Minnesota counties would remain unmet;
transit service in the metro are would decline; the
potential would exist for increased road weight restrictions
and other system constraints; and local governments would
receive no increase in transportation funding unless
provided by local taxes.
If this' scenario is applied through the end of the decade,
the impacts are seriously compounded. The state would begin
to lose federal highway aid in fiscal year 1996 due to
insufficient state matching funds; there would be no annual
state highway construction program beginning in FY 2000;
there would be a serious decline in state wide transit
programs; and throughout the state there would be a
significant reduction in private sector jobs dependent on
highway construction.
•
• Investment Preservation-Plus Transit (FY 94-2000) : This
scenario describes the financial needs -and system impacts
through the end of the decade of preserving the current $400
million annual investment in state highway construction and
providing for identified state wide transit needs. Meeting
these goals through FY 2000 would require an additional
average annual investment of $93 million for state highways
and $45 million for state transit programs (other than LRT) .
It is important to stress that this scenario maintains a
level of construction program spending, not construction
activity, and the buying power of that spending will decline
in later years. .
Transportation Scenarios
pg. 3
This level of investment would impact the transportation
system in several ways. The state would be assured of
utilizing all available federal highway aid through FY 2000;
limited transit service would be provided to all greater-
Minnesota counties; metro transit service improvements (as
identified by the Regional Transit Board) would be
implemented; the rate of increase in the number of deficient
bridges in the state would be slowed; and identified safety
improvements for the highway system would be implemented at
today's current rate.
Under this scenario, however, the rebuilding cycle for state
highways would remain at 105 years, meaning that the state
transportation infrastructure would continue to deteriorate
at a rate faster than the state could respond.
Investment Preservation-Plus Transit (FY 94-95) : This
scenario describes the financial needs and system impacts in
the next biennium alone of preserving the current $400
million annual investment in state highway construction and
providing for identified state wide transit needs. Meeting
these goals through FY 95 would require an additional annual
investment of $65 million for state highways .and $27 million
for state transit programs.
The impacts of this level of investment are similar to the
impacts described in the previous scenario, but apply only
in the short term. Construction program deferrals would be
avoided; the state would be assured of utilizing all
available federal highway aid through FY 95; and the •
implementation of previously referred to transit
improvements would begin. However, as in the previous
scenario, the state transportation infrastructure would
continue to deteriorate at a rate faster than the state •
could respond.
Economic Development (FY 94-2000) : This scenario describes
the financial needs through the end of the decade of meeting
three important transportation initiatives: 1) providing
improved highway connections between the state's regional
economic centers; 2) meeting the increased transportation
funding needs of local governments in order to maintain the
current rate of reconstruction for the state aid highway
system; 3) maintaining needed state wide transit
improvements over the long-term.
gi3
Transportation Scenarios
pg. 4
Meeting these goals through FY 2000 would require an
additional annual investment of $264 million for state
highways, $134 million for Minnesota counties, $67 million
for local governments, and $45 million for state transit
programs.
. In meeting the stated goals of this scenario, this level of
investment would establish a $500 million annual state
highway construction program; create an additional 4 , 200 to
5, 000 private sector jobs; improve the state highway
rebuilding cycle to 85 years; reduce the number of deficient
bridges on the system; and improve the delivery of safety
and maintenance activities.
Competitive Advantage (FY 94-2000) : This final scenario
describes the financial needs through the end of the decade
of developing the top transportation system in the region,
enhancing our quality of life and improving transportation's
support for state wide economic growth. This scenario
maintains the goals for counties and local municipalities
described in the "Economic Development" scenario.
Meeting these goals through FY 2000 would require an
additional annual investment of $666 million for state
• highways, $134 million for Minnesota counties, $67 million
for local governments, and $47 million for state transit
programs.
This level of investment would provide for an $825 million
annual state highway construction program; create an
additional 18, 000 to 20, 000 private s€ ,'tor jobs; improve the
state highway rebuilding cycle to the best-case-scenario"
of 50 years; significantly reduce the number of deficient
bridges on the highway system; and greatly improve the
delivery of safety and maintenance activities.
CONCLUSION
The scenarios outlined above are specific points on a broad
spectrum of transportation options available to Minnesota.
In order to make the best possible decisions on
transportation policy for today and the future, we believe
the citizens of Minnesota must first have a clear
understanding of where we are today, the choices available
and the implications attendant with each. That is precisely
the purpose of this educational effort.
Cal
/
r O c
c a, c v)
_ N v a c E
r' y - • •v c
sG � t) 2 ! d 0 >, a"i ti3v >,
G. Of O
' ao, \ cqjo
� ya)i 0.'yE 41 = s = 0 v � = u cV
s 0 it
ez
0 " � ... > . O 'a E � " c o
S. 04 a>,_c h 0 -6 '0 V Q W + + 3 E— y an
•0 v, .. ti
In = 0y °iU
N V
O a, ar = O `" d 0 >, In = y
�+ > .0 u ti C >. o QJ .- >
_� ma: G.►- �,, � .- a O O = 1.4^o>i .p3 o 0,
11 0 11 � o ' O it Q � a, ga, •
E 'E > p4.. cc >, 2 `�.ti
am W
g z Q .vE >'= = � 0 O d a ra�. ,°-p of >,
.r C T. .i ...p y y Y 1 E+ E p y In CC U ap� -• ti ._
_ c v ti v 0) p 0
LLJ Z ti '�. ate, C ai 0 �. •O a, ar _ :: a L
QZ °s °u'� c c N'c d a O O� o = ., •,; � � 04 th ea
O = dd W + `+ � oy � �° � ° — vi
W
LL-
IX Z a a,
WO = a 0 " °
.
_
Q °g y o O
d • C h >, c c y
a)I a
Ili 1._
L.,17 p
NM O c +-.0 y E" H ti d M M 6 E aJ Es 0 p O�i to y >,.5 G
_ v E Es a = R
Qd _� �•° .14 V) = O. d U. + + in o ct e p ... E ° -
rti V .in •C4)t0 W E s V CV
cx Q .
�/ E ate, O..v -O c,>-.c v Op i O op:° C, —
t � v, O DO y G,y'C dm it
G � ' O y u =d y Cp •0
a, c• ar = "a y v °AON ' i O °c + = Mir
0 p ee
� �� ti us
raJ
� , � 1: ;� R v >' > 2 u
E= z •0
R>,
.f)
V i +
6
V 0 _ --u•0 0 S w ol v a: � R a v
d a ' = > c � c `cs av�• d � 0 g
ti d °' VJ V •C •c > r' V t'
•E •c L s 3 s
•p u i. ca G•= R C C QCQ C
a, vJ to — V 0 a, 0 C C C G
_ •t r c L y L_ p ' ' e C Q)
= `V. GC 0.1 0 ,E a Y. Y. 2C. 'C
• .4o ti V a, -- c >,v c y C c as
c v, o=
0 2 ` c a C o c
Q
c0 a o s a �Z a ai
tx in
a° c •ao.0 , a o� a� i E c d
CO
In n. E> � o
t v t4 p p v al p 3- E S IE C O co O a) a)
F- o � EaX1E� cca > 0.• > e•cc � 0 0 c ` E > i
C
TS 4! V J u
fa a) ra 15,• ° = r L .0 1�. L y •i>.. _u Cd >tv c y _c v_, _ c E >.
v v, N L. y v 7 'fl O N r
c v � ' 7 u v ° c ti c v° tyi c v '° .>, c
R. y X _ Lu Cu y C v c }>. E �i 'C r Ori 0uJ C r v u v, ct
r y c R = to E .� C C v y y C v C =
*,7 'tC �; to z� .O y = �i 4+ > in i ° u c y r C .� C ft
y > r LO CC y C > 'r L cc C a. i p. C .Z 3 E ` i
: . ti a 4A 2 .E o°oE c v = � ._E -0 (X E2 3 .E v c E v 6 'c
O " L
O y
C° t " L y C r 0_
• . . >12
= 'C u h O . E u y y+ C ..-ts o- -Q _ E r C 7 V u .. y r t
h 3 Q c ? :° _ C C �,E y • V y LL v
X u C y
C m ee C C v • y WS ti .0 C E .E to p • C ;E .7 › a,u v CO: p c .. y p .. y y >, E >L z ' L a,
D u, c v) A o. 2 .z� c E o y a .L. .� y L E. en L G ' ° E r
.0 .0 rc = > u: > —y 'C
'� c 0 7 ar, v c :' c ,� .L�. E o cis > E c y c 6.1 r 7 >, A.,� R F 7 y t'G y O S. p > C E v a: C y>..
Q1 O .•
y
C -E E t ..• y .0 7 .= V ,2 y C i -7.., '� E ° :L = .0 ..' �}; •r ..+
L 7 to u = C y E eo C pp E >' u C "- E y u t. y a -a E
'J eyz C 'y- m c .a y "O : "O L t .0 C G .> — tc C .0 _C .. t� .0 C
s .eet .a to u° — a,
, u g E `mac E c ° °c - " -6-0..9. L t r L •a — r > CE p c L
ffl (r) ,.7. to Z 3 .. to > tyA i X o u (f) E ° ^ o1. cl. Cad
y . a
Ec Cl) E ;� ... � ti
'r' i L a. E y a) r°n C u ,� 'B
G 7 ti ay. C - eLC C v y U. O =
>, �... _■ 7 ^ y G ›th 'C •C y L > y Cl)C .. •� vyi O >`.y
C y D_D a _C a = C y v` 0 y C i r O C C E., .L y. 0. et 'C C y cr. r ..
L R _ 2 r G CE • r0° .E c c z c p 'v', .rL.. 'y 'p ai v .L. E a E t.i eh co c
...
ez CC ti C S •r C r 'O > '_ E 'C1 to . > C GC C -,' C C a\, a 3 y y.
e>z u) u E .? c .. c°o s 3 a.-. E cyu E ¢ °u a 0 E E E :.. c. u
4 to
c _c 6.
L -0 y.0 LE.,O C OLi eyz 7 y yN v°, •� C'e^ C r v �' .�' C o,
•,C u G O i v .0 A, •; 'X eC"6.E C `.v 3., C >' CC r > v)
C.., v, a.tor. p ' ffl O c C L > L y y C'O y h ti O v v, u O ..
er a E c 'v a E >. 7 u
"t c.y = •v >,c�, E g c• M..., c y .E y r:.. _ •v c r a_.o
'° .c - , c tN E .E � $ = c � y a � �� r. Nar 'E .� `c3Lc
CU C co} yCDrpO en ti N O C L > G O L •L r Ori 7 > O'v L 'G u C cu y •
y
.LL. C.c.a Z 11.E eh y 7 p O X A �d y C L p y re) V C G+ r C Or 7 " E CU
d3 >,.a Z .E ,.. to y s Z 'p 31 ch 7 WS u vn N•_ -. r C E ._ C, c -c v
O C
O
N = Q
,t O
= o 3
> o c u•.. .i c .i ;Q s v d m c
c
C C ° E O7 C
>.
I- N vt° °v = i 3 3 O ... o • 2 N
w 2 co C > g '6) °'H ` ? _ N. o ° ° _ v a � RC � �n ir
N N = N
- tj --/6
S 0—'4*
by)bn se
BOOKS & FLORAL
, ,/ /7 1964 Rahncliff Court #600
Eagan, MN 55122
(612) 688-2488
•
November 6, 1992
Miller & Schroeder Investments Inc. `
Northwestern Financial Center
P.0, Box 789
Minneapolis, MN 55440
Dear Miller, Schroeder Investments, Inc. :
This letter is to inform you that SonRise strongly objects
to the possibility of Schinders as a tenant at The Crossings.
As Eagan area residents and business women of this community
we find this type business disrespectful to us and a detre-
ment to our neighborhood due to the pornographic materials
typically sold in Schinders stores. '
It would be in the 'best interest of The Crossings and Eagan
that you withdraw your lease proposal . We appreciate your
consideration and propose that you redirect your efforts
toward more wholesome business pursuits.
Sincerely,
// ' 4 r.
/n2, 0
i . ' e . ' •
Jan Kneer
Pat Neppl •
Juli Bailey
DiAnn Mayer
cc: Ken Norwich _
Kelly Doran
- Tom Egan
Pat Geagen
MUNICIPAL 1500 Northland Plaza
LEGISLATIVE 3800 West 80th Street
Bloomington,Minnesota 55431
COMMISSION Telephone (612)893-6650
Facsimile (612)893-6755
MEMO
TO: MLC BOARD OF DIRECTORS
FROM: BOB RENNER, JR.
RE: 1992 SUBURBAN ELECTION RESULTS
• DATE: NOVEMBER 5, 1992
The following information has been derived from the results of the 1992 elections.
Voters from the seven county metropolitan area elected 79 legislators that represent the
suburbs (areas outside of Minneapolis and St. Paul). This is an increase of 14 legislators
compared to the total from 1991 due to redistricting.
Of the 79 suburban legislators elected, 29 will be first term members (38%).
The suburbs will be represented by 27 Senators and 52 House members. Thirty-nine
percent of the legislature will be suburban members. If you include Minneapolis and St.
Paul, the seven county metro area is represented by 107 of the 201 legislature or 53% of
the total.
Of the 27 Senators, 16 will caucus with the DFL and 11 with the IR's. The 52 House
members are represented by 27 IR's and 25 DFLer's. The total is slightly DFL with 41
suburban DFLer's and 38 IR's.
The 29 first term suburban legislators will be represented by 12 IR's and 17 DFLer's.
The 14 new suburban districts that were created due to reapportionment will be
represented by 5 DFL members and 9 IR's.
There will be more women legislators representing the suburbs as a result of the 1992
elections. Of the 79 legislators, 30 will be women, a net gain of 11 from the previous
election.
The MLC legislative delegation will also change. The charts on the next page will
illustrate the composite results of the 1992 election.
1 �
Member Cities: Bloomington,Burnsville,Eagan,Eden Prairie,Edina,Lakeville,
Maplewood,Minnetonka,Plymouth,Roseville,Shoreview,White Bear Lake,Woodbury
MLC LEGISLATIVE DELEGATION
1990 1992 Difference
Senate Members 15 16 +1
House Members 21 26 +5
DFL Members 9 14 +5
IR Members 27 28 +1
First Term Members 11 19 +8
Women Members 13 13 -0- I
•
SUBURBAN LEGISLATIVE DELEGATION*,
1990 1992 Difference
Senate Members 22 27 +5
House Members 43 52 +9
DFL Members 28 41 +13
IR Members 37 38 +1
First Term Members 16 29 +13
Women Members 19 30 +11
* Includes the entire seven county metropolitan area except Minneapolis and St. Paul.
If any trends could be surmised based upon these results, it would probably be fair to say
that the suburban delegation has increased its strength (14 additional legislators), has
become more DFL (13 new DFL members compared to 1 IR) and has become more female
(11 new female legislators). The MLC delegation has increased its numbers by 6 •
members and has become more DFL. The number of women that represent the MLC
remains at 13.
e:D i
•
MESSERLI & - KRAMER
WILLIAM F. MESSERLI
ROSS E.KRAMER WILLIAM D.TURKULA
ATTORNEYS AT LAW FRANK S.FARRELL,JR.
TOM TOGAS
DAVID R.KRACUM 1500 NORTHLAND PLAZA BUILDING ANN M.SETNES
MARK S.LARSON JOHN F. APITZ
TIMOTHY J.BAUER 3800 WEST 80TH STREET ANNE L.JOHNSON
ROBERT G.RENNER,JR. LEANNE G.LITFIN
SANDRA .NEREN MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55431-4409 PETER D.MAGNUSON
RANDOLPH W.MORRIS FLORENCE HUMPHREY BATCHELOR
CHRISTOPHER B.HUNT (612) 893-6650 MICHAEL L.WEAVER
JAMES C.WICKA FACSIMILE (612) 893-6755
PAUL A.SORTLAND•
JOSEPH B.NIERENBERG
WILLIAM C.HICKS•• WRITER'S DIRECT DIAL NUMBER
DAVID D. HICKS •••>r •ALSO ADMITTED IN NORTH DAKOTA
WILLIAM M.HABICHT ALSO ADMITT[D IN aOUTN DAKOTA
PAUL W.ANDERSON 893-6672 ALSO ADMITTCO IN WISCONSIN
•ALSO ADMITTED IN MONTANA
November 3, 1992
•
Mr. Don Diddams
League of Minnesota Cities
3490 Lexington Avenue North
St. Paul, MN 55126
Dear Don:
In my opinion, the meeting of city finance lobbyists held on November 2nd was constructive and
beneficial for all groups that attended. I would like to re-emphasize the position of the MLC as
it pertains to a new LGA Formula. The MLC will not support a new formula that does not
include a provision which would guarantee a minimum aid amount to each and every city in
Minnesota regardless of property wealth.
The MLC believes this policy is fair and equitable since the dollars being allocated for the new
LGA formula will have been derived from the Local Government Trust Fund. MLC cities
contribute more than $75.1 million of sales tax dollars to the LGTF each year.
The discretionary 1/20 of sales tax amounts to $18.8 million from MLC cities. Although we
understand the purpose for redistribution of some tax dollars, our organization also believes
that a system that redistributes every dollar from some cities to others is bad state policy. All
of our citizens, rich and poor, pay a portion of their income in sales tax. Therefore, a portion of
these dollars should be returned to those who pay it.
Although the MLC does not advocate a specific dollar minimum, for illustrative purposes, I
used $25 per capita to calculate the minimum distribution amount. The total "cost" to the new
formula would be a small percentage of the total dollars allocated to LGA. The numbers on the
following page are "ballpark figures."
ca0
Mr. Diddams
November 3, 1992
Page Two
•*Cost to guarantee each MLC cities (12 cities) $25 per capita $11.5 million
••Cost to guarantee all cities (including MLC cities) that receive $0 $13.2 million
of LGA under the current LGA formula (64 cities)
••Cost of increasing LGA to the 99 cities that currently receive $5.6 million
some aid but less than $25.
The total "cost" of$18.8 million is less than 6% of the total of the $321 million allocated to
LGA. (Even though these cities with less than $25 per capita comprise approximately 27% of
the population of Minnesota cities.)
Please feel free to pass this information on to other members of the committee. I will see you
on November 10th.
in
S cer 1 ey,
MESSERLI & KRAMER
Robert G. Renner, Jr.
RGR/esf
cc: MLC Operating Committee
•
c2.C /
MEMO TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCILMEMBERS
FROM: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES
DATE: NOVEMBER 9, 1992
SUBJECT: ADDITIONAL INFORMATION FOR SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL
MEETING/TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 10
Please note that the day of the week is incorrect on the Special City Council meeting agenda
and should read Tuesday. If you would like a different meal, please contact Karen by noon
and arrangements will be made for your preference of sandwich from Al Baker's Restaurant.
Regarding the budget review portion of the Special City Council meeting,it is recommended
that in the one hour of time, the City Council focus on the 1993 general fund and public
enterprise fund budgets. It is more important that direction be given to the City
Administrator and all departments on these two (2) budgets than the capital improvements
budget at this time. Any further revisions to the general fund or public enterprise fund
budgets need to be completed prior to December 1 for the budget presentation. Truth in
taxation only applies to the general fund; however, it would be appropriate to adopt the
entire operating budget including both general fund and public enterprise.
Rather than continue to address various portions of the capital improvements budget at
different workshops, it is suggested that the entire capital improvements budget, including
all three (3) parts, be addressed at a workshop session when the City Administrator has
more time to present all the information for City Council review. It is suggested that a work
session be scheduled for December 8 for that purpose. There may or may not be reason
to hold the special work session on November 17 prior to the regular City Council meeting.
If the City Council is satisfied having completed final review of the entire CIP at the
December 8 meeting, then action could be scheduled for the December 15 meeting for its
adoption. There are two (2) exceptions to this recommended process. Those are: 1) tour
of the law enforcement/municipal center building scheduled at 4:00 p.m. tomorrow and 2)
continued research and the field trip/work session scheduled for Saturday, November 21 to
review the recreational facility capital project.
PUBLIC ENTERPRISE FUND BUDGET
Please refer to the attached memo as a supplement to the public enterprise fund budget
memo that was distributed last Friday.
/S/ Thomas L. Hedges
City Administrator
cc: Councilmember-elect Hunter
Councilmember-elect Masin
TLH/vmd
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR & CITY COUNCILMEMBERS
FROM: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES
DATE: NOVEMBER 9, 1992
SUBJECT: ADDITIONAL INFORMATION/PUBLIC ENTERPRISE FUND BUDGET FOR
1993
The distribution on Friday did not include a copy of the detailed
worksheets for the public enterprise fund accounts, including
water, sanitary sewer, streetlighting and storm sewer. These
detailed worksheets have been completed and are enclosed for
Council review.
The information that was distributed on Friday provided limited
information on the water and sanitary sewer, mainly an overview for
those two (2) departments. The following is a more detailed
explanation of the entire public enterprise fund budget, including
additional narrative on water and sanitary sewer in addition to new
narrative on streetlighting and storm sewer budgets for 1993 .
WATER AND SANITARY SEWER DIVISIONS
After further consideration this weekend and review of the
operating budgets for both the water and sanitary sewer divisions,
it is recommended that the full-time utility maintenance employee
position for the sanitary sewer system be considered for January
1993 , the same as the recommendation for the maintenance employee
in the water department. The original recommendation of the City
Administrator was to fund the water division maintenance employee
in 1993 and the sanitary sewer employee in 1994. The following are
reasons for those changes.
First of all, the last employees hired within the public enterprise
fund budget were in the year 1990. Since then, the distribution
system has expanded from 258.55 miles to 267.82 miles - an increase
of 9.27 miles. (These mileage figures do not include any expansion
for the current year of 1992 or the upcoming calendar year 1993 . )
Likewise, the collection system has increased from 220. 35 miles to
228. 52 miles - an increase of 8. 17 miles. (Similar to the
distribution system, these numbers do not include any expansion of
the collection system for 1992 or 1993. ) In 1990, the division was
not involved in the storm system maintenance, except in responding
to problems during significant rainfalls. With the creation of the
storm water enterprise budget, there has been more emphasis placed
on the 155. 64 miles of storm water system, in addition to 320
ponding areas than any other time in the City of Eagan's history.
(These miles do not take into consideration the expansion for 1992
or 1993 of the storm sewer system. ) There are other factors, such
as the water production of the utility department's expansion of
three additional wells and the Cliff Road Water Treatment Facility.
These increases have required the necessity to shift employees from
IL T
C
preventative maintenance programs into production maintenance and
storm system work. Along with the increased population, the time
involved in locations for the Gopher State One Call System has also
expanded. Please review the following tables which illustrate how
both the water and sewer division personnel allocation of hours has
changed since 1990.
TABLE I
WATER DIVISION PERSONNEL HOURS
1990 1991 1992 % Change
(thru 10/17) 1990-1992
Meter Repair 5385 4130 3514
and Customer hours hours hours -35%
Service
Distribution 4943 4404 4367
System hours hours hours -22%
Production, 1644 1929 4274
Wells & hours hours hours +62%
Sampling
TABLE 2
SEWER DIVISION PERSONNEL HOURS
1990 1991 1992 % Change
(thru 10/17) 1990-1992
Gopher One 1060 1274 1529
Call and hours hours hours +30%
Inspections
Sanitary 5838 4480 4075
Collection hours hours hours -30%
System
Storm 2496 2313 2462
Collection hours hours hours 0%
System
OTHER
(Snow Plowing 3619 3783 4125
Park & Street hours hours hours +13%
Assistance)
%
With the decreased time spent in meter programs, distribution and
• sanitary collection, the possibility of system failure increases.
Some of this impact on continuing service will result in lost
revenue due to faulty meters, an increase in equipment malfunction
and sewer backups. This relates to a lower level and quality of
uninterrupted service to the residents and businesses in Eagan.
The most important benefit of considering additional personnel will
be the expansion of the business hours of the utility department.
As discussed in the information sent out Friday, new personnel will
be scheduled to work from 1:30 or 2:00 p.m. until 10:00 p.m. ,
Monday through Friday. This will allow the utility department to
improve customer r service calls and meter ro change programs. The
P g
utility department will also be able to increase the commercial
meter program, allowing the City to remove and test meters during
downtime in commercial plants and business operations. This is
important considering that 45% of water revenue is generated from
commercial users. With the two (2) additional employees, the City
is more able to adhere to the confined space entry law and be able
to clean and repair sewers in industrial and shopping areas which
are too crowded for safe daytime operations.
The number of connections to the water and sewer system has grown
to over 16, 000. The utility division has done an outstanding job
of providing a high level of quality service and that commitment
can only continue with the expansion of the work force and business
hours. The information and trends that are indicated in Tables 1
and 2 are a result of analyzing the City's time allocation sheets
that are used for payroll purposes.
Regarding the water division, there are several other accounts that
require some additional discussion and information to the City
Council. The $160,500 increase in system repair/labor is due
mainly to an acceleration in the meter change-over program.
Instead of budgeting the replacement of domestic meters for ten
(10) years, it is suggested that program be condensed to a six (6)
year program and that 2, 000 meters, at $75 each, be replaced during
1993 at a cost of $150, 000. This is the major portion of the
system repair/labor expenses. The support for reducing the
replacement program from ten (10) years to six (6) years is to
allow the entire system over a shorter period of time to be
operational on the same type of meters. Also, the $16, 000 budgeted
for professional services is a program the Director of Public Works
and City Administrator are proposing that would privatize the meter
reading of 16, 000 accounts at 80 cents and allow an additional
$1, 300 in full-time maintenance personnel to be utilized in
preventative programs. This action does not mitigate the need for
the full-time maintenance person as presented earlier in this memo.
There is also an increase of approximately $5, 000 under engineering
services that allows the City to perform a water rate study,
systems analysis, energy study and the related under contractual
services.
3
As stated in the brief memo dated Friday, November 6, a significant
increase to the water division budget is the new State Health
Department mandate for testing services. The City Council
addressed this issue several months ago raising objection with our
legislative delegation that a $5.21 surcharge by the Health
Department for water sampling is inappropriate. However, the
charge which totals $87,400 after multiplying the 16, 000 accounts,
must be reflected in the 1993 budget and payment made unless the
State law is relaxed or changed to be more cost responsible.
While insurance, like the general fund, is increasing dramatically,
the electricity for the wells/booster stations, is projected as
savings for 1992 . The insurance again relates to workers
compensation and health costs. The electricity used for pumping
water in the production system is being decreased due to a more
accurate estimate of the amount of gallons produced and sold.
A significant increase in the operating budget is under renewal and
replacement renovations to the Cliff Road Reservoir/repaint and
modification at $95, 000, clean exterior Safari & Yankee Reservoir
at $30, 000 and improvements to the Cedar Grove Wells #1 and #2,
Service Pump #2 at the Coachman High and renovation of Well #8 that
total $34, 500 collectively. These proposed budget amounts, in
addition to the routine operational repairs, total $234,500,
estimated for 1993 . Unlike the general fund budget, renewal and
replacement as well as capital outlay are budgeted as an operating
expenditure causing the public enterprise fund budget to fluctuate
each year.
The interest on water revenue bonds is decreasing over calendar
years 1991 and 1992 and is estimated at $1, 027,800 as a direct cost
to the water department budget.
The capital outlay totals $970, 650 of which $450, 000 of that cost
has been pre-approved by the City Council as 50% of the cold
storage building expense. City Council action has already been
taken to approve this expenditure for 1993. The other major
expense is development of Well #17 in the south field at an
estimated cost of $300, 000. Other expenses range from draw down
probes to certain wells, software management system information,
SCADA upgrade of wells, the purchase of land for the Deerwood
Reservoir and other items of equipment, incl ding certain vehicular
replacement. Please refer to pages '/ through 8' as
attachments for the proposed capital ou lay. The only other
expense is the bond payment principal in the amount of $350, 000 and
merchandise for resale which includes meters with copper horns and
commercial meters.
SANITARY SEWER DIVISION
The request for additional personnel in the sanitary sewer division
was discussed earlier in this memo and the specific reasons for
including a new employee in 1993 is best illustrated in table two.
Other budgetary considerations include an increase of $9, 500 for
utility system parts which is due to a larger and older system
which requires more repair on an ongoing basis. It is proposed
that the professional services will be increased for televising the
existing system at approximately $.20 per linear foot for 35, 000
feet of televising in 1993.
As stated in the memo dated November 6, on page 22B, the major
operating expense to the sanitary sewer division is the MCC
disposal charges totalling $2,341, 000 estimated 1993 . This is an
increase of approximately $27,000 from 1992.
The total capital proposed for 1993 is $548,200 of which $450,000
is the 50% match of the cold storage building discussed under the
water division budget. The remaining $98,200 is for several
capital items ranging from small equipment to a trench box required
by OSHA, to equipment replacement including a skidster loader one
ton truck, four door sedan and 3/4 ton pick-up. For addi tonal
information on the capital outlay request, refer to page
To summarize the water and sanitary sewer divisions, the total
proposed budget for the water division is $4,262, 600, while
sanitary sewer totals $3 , 518,800. There is a continued emphasis to
enhance public service as a public utility and that reason and
justification for additional personnel is related directly to that
philosophy. A request for certain capital items can be explained
in further detail once reviewed by the City Council.
STREETLIGHTING
The streetlighting budget reflects the cost for the power for
neighborhood streetlighting, commuinity intersection lights and
certain traffic lights. Also included in the expenditure for 1993
is the sales tax on power and a 6% rate increase projected by
Northern States Power.
For the most part, the streetlighting budget reflects a cost for
the purchase of power, which is offset by a similar amount billed
on the quarterly water sewer/storm sewer bills.
STORM WATER UTILITY
The storm water utility budget includes operational, renewal and
replacement and capital improvement and refinement. This operating
budget lacks history in that the storm water utility budget was
separated from the general fund and the public enterprise fund
water and sewer divisions as a separate division in 1991. A
significant decrease in 1992 is in herbicide and iron treatments
for general lake and pond treatment for water quality. There is a
$24,700 budget reduction proposed. Also proposed is a reduction in
professional services from $37,580 to $15, 100 for televising the
storm sewer system and water quality educational programming and
media presentation.
r
One area of increase is for testing services which are specifically
lab costs for various monitoring sites, runoff sampling and other
analysis increasing that account by approximately $17,850. The
utility system repair has been increased by $16, 300 for lift
stations, pond outlet control structures, delta removal and the
related.
There is a request for a water resource technician, whose duties
would be to work on past projects, enforcement of the 1991 State °
Wetlands Conservation Act and other related services. Specific
duties would include calibration operation of specialized equipment
for runoff sampling, field checks of wetland delineations,
coordination and implementation of community education projects,
informational technical assistance to the public, preparation of
diagnostic feasibility reports for lake water shed improvement
projects and initiation and coordination of volunteer partnership
projects through local neighborhoods, civic groups, scouting
organizations, fertilizer sales and the like.
Regarding the capital outlay proposed for 1993, please refer to
page AD which includes both small and large equipment. The
skidster loader which has been divided by water, sewer and storm
sewer divisions is the largest single piece of equipment proposed
in the storm water utility budget.
SUMMARY
The City Administrator will provide a summary of expenditures and
additional data relative to revenues for each of the public
enterprise fund accounts at the meeting on Tuesday.
City Administra or; -
cc: Councilmember-elect Hunter
Councilmember-elect Masin
TLH/vmd
CITY OF EAGAN
1993
DETAIL OF CAPITAL OUTLAY FORM
WATER - /61
Number
Account of Unit Total Cost Net
Number Item Units Cost Cost Split Cost
4520-1 Cold Storage Bldg. 24,000 SF $37.50/SF $900,000 $450,000* $450,000
(#62)
4570-1 GA 52 Schonsted 2 $ 800 $ 1,600 $ 1,600
locators
4570-2 SCADA Upgrade of wells 5 $ 3,500 $ 17,500 $ 17,500
#1, #2, #3, #4, #6
4570-3 Hansen Software
Management System 1 $ 10,000 $ 10,000 $ 10,000
4570-4 Draw Down Probes to
wells #4, #8, #6, #1,
#12 5 $ 3,000 $ 15,000 $ 15,000
4570-5 Develop well #17 in
south field 1 $300,000 $300,000 $300,000
4570-6 Add start capacitors
to well field 17 $ 1,000 $ 17,000 $ 17,000
4570-7 Upgrade filter bay
"B" at Coachman
Treatment Plant 1 $ 30,000 $ 30,000 $ 30,000
4570-8 Purchase land for
Deerwood reservoir 1 $ 30,000 $ 30,000 $30,000
4570-9 Poloroid camera 1 $ 100 $ 100 $ 100
4570-10 Vibration Tester 1 $ 2,000 $ 2,000 $ 2,000
4570-11 Hach 2000 Sampler 1 $ 2,300 $ 2,300 $ 2,300
4570-12 Color Printer 1 $ 900 $ 900 $ 900
2
7
m .
CITY OF EAGAN
1993
DETAIL OF CAPITAL OUTLAY FORM
WATER - #61
(CONTINUED)
Number
Account of Unit Total Cost Net
Number Item Units Cost Cost Split Cost
4580-1 5/8 Pickup 1 $ 17,500 $ 17,500 $ 17,500
4580-2 Four Door Sedan
Replacement for Unit
, 200 (Split 1/2
61 and 62) 1 $ 13,500 $13,500 - $6,750 $ 6,750
4580-3 Skidsteer Loader and
trailer (Split 1/3
61, 62 and 64) 1 $ 30,000 $30,000 $20,000* $ 10,000
(#62 & #64)
4580-4 3/4 Ton Pickup with
Utility Body (Replace-
ment for unit #207) 1 $ 20,000 $ 20,000 -0- $ 20,000
4580-5 1 Ton Truck with plow,
box and sander (Replace-
ment for unit #206) 1 $ 30,000 $ 30,000 -0- $ 30,000
4531 Special Assessments on
City Property $ 10,000
TOTAL $970,650
CITY OF EAGAN
1993
DETAIL OF CAPITAL OUTLAY FORM
SEWER - #62
Number
Account of Unit Total Cost Net
Number Item Units Cost Cost Split Cost
4520-1 Cold Storage Bldg. 24,000 $ 37.50 $900,000 450,000 $450,000
sq. ft. sq. ft. (#61)
4570-1 SCADA Upgrade for
Sanitary System 2 $ 4,000 $ 8,000 -0- $ 8,000
4570-2 Hansen Software
Upgrade 1 $ 6,500 $ 6,500 -0- $ 6,500
4570-3 One Tripod for
Confined Space Entry 1 $ 4,000 $ 4,000 -0- $ 4,000
4570-4 Trench Box 1 $ 12,000 $ 12,000 -0- $ 12,000
4570-5 Camera Equipment 35mm 1 $ 150 $ 150 -0- $ 150
4570-6 GA-52 Schonsted Locator 1 $ 800 $ 800 -0- $ 800
4580-1 Four Door Sedan
(Split 1/2 61 and 62) 1 $ 13,500 $ 13,500 $6.,750 $ 6,750
4580-2 Skidsteer Loader and
trailer (Split 1/3 1 $ 30,000 $ 30,000 20,000 $ 10,000
61,62 and 64) (#61,64)
4580-3 1-Ton Truck with utility
body, and hoist 1 $ 30,000 $ 30,000 -0- $ 30,000
4580-4 3/4 Ton Pickup 1 $ 20,000 $ 20,000 -0- $ 20,000
TOTAL $548,200
6b:sewerbud.93
k
CITY OF EAGAN
k
1993
DETAIL OF CAPITAL OUTLAY AND EQUIPMENT
DEPARTMENT 64
Number
Account of Unit Total Net
Number Item Units Cost Cost Trades Cost
4570-1 Refrigerator 1 $200 $ 200 - $ 200
4570-2 Runoff Sampler Parts 3 $100 $ 300 - $ 300
4570-3 Deep Cell Marine
Batteries 5 $ 50 $ 250 - $ 250
4570-4 Van Doren Sampler 1 $250 $ 250 - $ 250
4570-5 Digital Planimeter 1 $300 $ 300 - $ 300
4570-6 Automatic Rain Gauges
and Data Loggers 10 $2,000 $20,000 - $20,000
.570-7 Runoff Samplers 1 $2,800 $ 2,800 - $ 2,800
4570-8 Flow Meters 2 $3,300 $ 6,600 - $ 6,600
Sub-Total - Capital Outlay $30,700 - $30,700
4580-1 Boat, motor, and
trailer 1 $ 4,500 $ 4,500 - $ 4,500
4580-2 Skidsteer loader and
trailer (split 1/3
between 61, 62 & 64) 1 $10,000 $10,000 - $10,000
Sub-Total - Equipment $14,500 $14,500 - $14,500
TOTAL CAPITALY OUTLAY
AND EQUIPMENT $47,040 - $45,200
-'1:dpt64bud.93 Rev. 9/28/92
/c:7
•
•
Z
S O 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
O. Q c O ti P OD - - to N
r' > U N P• P M J
F W W e- e- M 1!1 O
N .t
U
I— O O 0 O 0 0 O O O
M I- CO 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0
Os N
O.
W W 0 0 1s- P CO -t Y1
p 0 N P M 4'
W 00 M IA 0
ce N 1
P O P ▪ P M O N O
> H O
O 0 M IA '0 1 N 0 IA 0
_ > N N M -O
c;,.
P N LA
0
a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
CV 0 M N J 0 M 0
13, ce
P a P•• P -
Q P M• CV M M
a+
N M
C
7
0
U Q O p
P v N 0 P IIn P
)" p.
P F �!' IA e-
e. N M P M
•Q O M M N �t P
M 0 c%.1
M
2 's a+
7 a+ v
W Of
.O M PS .3. I- 'O O 1 0 IA
41 pa�� p. J 0 M PS �T IA N 4O
L• �X pMp., P V P P �T �C CO N I-
f-
II) w O Q P N
a+ 0
C
W C
3
0
Y
W
d
L in
m L a+ y
co .— U co
CA
FWa W U 00 C N 9 OC 4- CO 0 > J
O1 CC • y I.. a+ m CO el a
D H c E , y QyEC� U J y •; 10 C CO CA IT L-
Q W 0 d l0 L L 0 otl II) W .Y
z 2 'p> cc 2 •'per 'p7 N N W
W
0. N cn
G! E O W C! W a W W C
.L 7 ++ L 7 7 a+ U U L
O) L L 10 L L 0 .—
d
CO U- U >0 _. U U F w w 1U
N Q 0 N Q Q 0 0 Or
U
W
o I—
LL _ * N N N
P 4O v .t .t v 1 1 # .t .T .t
•
•
.. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ..
Z
Z a a a a o O 0 0 O o 0 0 0
M O Z O O 0 0 O 0 0 O 0 0
O` Q £ N ..t -.T 0 O CO O X X O O Ml
-- Y U M e- N •0 P N O 1- L.', '0
.-. ce X
C X
H 0 0 O O 0 O O O O O 0 0 0
M I- N O O O O O O O O O O
PO O. w N ..T .. O O co P X Ul O. in
a 0 M .-- N `O P X N •0 O
C X
X
■
N N .O in .t r` r` ti O O O O in
U 0 P P M N O In NI P in
v
H O M O N M tl ..t Si.
O I M .- a- in e- IA .- M In
Z )- N
P 0•
0
o. o o O o 0 0 0 o O o 0 0 o O
N 0 o in o O O o 0 o O %o O
C •O J O N 0 O 0 M .O IA V1
Os
a
.- Q. CV M .t r` e- a- •O O,
Q v
4,
C
0
O
U
s N- N M N Q Q N N 1 M ` P v p
>+ p, = N M N- O N r\ .O N .t M N M .t
.0 P a N M N r` .- e- v
y M .—
Tr 0)
C 7
7 a+
a+ 0
u.. •� 01
d a J N A M N O .O N O M O
1� O A co
0 ID CO p0p� Q - N N in O in .O to M O P
•L X M P 12 - M N ,0 O M
CL W P L) M N
L.Ur w Q
a+ 0
C
W C
3
0
V
Y
W Cl) 0_ W N 01
01 ca
18 a
CW7 .-C ..-
C7 a. d ; d
..-W • N C W (0 .�
a! 0) •LL a+ E
C U) W U C � N 'p a-. W
pp Cl) U co
• . C CA L Cl) C L N U)
a pC .. 0)
o
j U •- 0. C . •a t0 O_ W V W
co 0) co o Z •3 CIL Cl) Cl) •4. ' •� 08 Y
J 0) 071 W CS 0) 7 C _U O 1+ -• a
C W 0 C t_ d ,C U- W H W CO CO
_.. _ U •C S U U
W U "O 0
•0. V 11 E E L €0
O X co C
-, C 0 CO Z J CGOO N Cl) U J
2
W
0 1-
N Q O N M .t O M In so CO O .t O
a 3 N N N (Si M M M M M M .t •• J In
LL N N N N N N N N N N N N N N
.O J .t .t .t .t .t .t .t s s s s .t .f P
•
Z
0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0
fel P Q in
0 pop 0 0 uii "O 0
• I- W M U)• N- r' 1 CO
••• K 5- N
U
r 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
M I- CO 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0' W = IA .O O 1 0 VA SO 1 II-
▪ 0 Id M 2 N- sO 5 1 CO
Ill � N
N N M O .0 in N Al P 0 O 0 1
IA 0 O, )O 1 0 0 N 0 in 1 A- 0 N M O CO . M _
O
M M M M in 1 .M O
Z > i CO NI rn
P Os
0
cL CD 0
N 0 0 O 0 -0 0 O 0 0 in 0 0
P a O 'O O• O O M O O
oi CL N N• M N 0 1 1 N
Q O P
Y I-
C
7
0
U
U _J �O 0 h 0 1 O M O O iO o
p. .1. IAn co i M �O P a�0 uNi
.- i Q O CO 1 a- M ,O
N .— .-
0) .
12 L
7 4+
7 •+ 0)
LL Q)
co in co• co ppO.. Q (Si 0 - pO Al O 1 P � O 1
so M
'L M P F=- a- M "O M N N-
O_ W P Q M 0
L.UU w
++ 0
C
W C
3
0
Y
U U •Y
L ..- N
CO _ W
a u) O Q N
W U CC U
co OL 'L N W S U p •u
'W .- C a0+ N U 0) N L
s+ U
U ,a L7 z C N x CU •U Lb O C N
7 CO CO a I- '> 0) ..- .c rn >,
U) U c oil O . L u C a+ 0 L
L ..-a € 4/ ad w CO ....> CO 0 U
21. U .— N L N 0.1 Ol U u. U >
C
CA Q ft, v)
>. a cW.l L 'c: rn L
• y 0 Of M ce otS � U ce H 0) -- N 0) C O)
U (0 ♦• W C V �U) l0 en
co V) co') = a W < d Y H 1
Ui
W
0 H
0 N 1 in 0
0 = IA in In 'O 4, _ _ _ .- N
LL N N N N # M M M tel M M M
P �O 1 1 1 1 i# 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
.. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ..
Z
s o O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O o O O
M CI Z O O O O O O O O O O O
P 6 F N P M O A. N it O O O O
Y U r .- WI r- in f- in• .- Al N
I- W in P M
U
Al
►- O O O O O O O O O O O O O O
IN P M O ti N O O O Q` in O
� W j
G Q in .- !s in .- Al Al
W in P M
a' Al
A.1 Al P a O O $ O er i-
O O P P O P N t )0 P N V
F V1 O N .O t V .- Al
O
M .- N- M O V1 M
Z >- i in 00 N
P P
O
a. O O O O O O O O O O O O O O
N O a 00 a O a N a O a a a
PP a N mot' .t O ..t 4. O O O O O
Q M .- CO A P• .- - M
M in N
i.. M
C
7
O
U
4 p. 6 N .O in 00 M O s N- a0Q)N. .? CO NO O
T H V1 N P M N- OO N- M
P Q N M N .t in Al M
0!
L
• .' ++
7 V 0)
W 0)
O) 2 7 J O OO O .p P a vii in 01,..0 0
N N CO O < .t in J .T t O .O
• p. .
P ^
O. & U M
0) •F
Q N
4- 0
C
W C
3
0
V
Y y
co g-
(1.) °' 2
L N
CO U N
C J
0 C > c N 4.
_ L 0 4-, ,.
L
•_ J
CO 0) Cl) 0 4, OO 0 a
$ L
J+
O O) •N d LL U of m U -.1
QQm
U Ol 1L •7 O U - C — ..-
> 4-. L J
C
> U w U O) > a a� = U)) a) Wa W`
vi a U U d d U C T (C ce 0.
O) W •>L. 0) I- co .- •`
co 7 O)
C 4, 0) C L O CL U U t7 W O)
LO W N O W - Z — C •- — C N
O. a L J W(,) .... CO W WL J O F+O
O) -+ W CO 01 C CO 0) C CO W 0 7 i•
F- W 1 H U 0 J C7 .-. W Z z 00 in
O.'
W
O H
Al Q .t In .O N P Al O O in .O rn in
O 3 M M M M M M .t in .O N- ti W
LL M M M M M M M M M M in M co co
rn ;O t .t .t .t .t J t t t t .t .t .t t P
•
.. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ..
Z
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C. 0 0
M 0 0 E O O O O O O O O O O O O
Q < •O to In ti •I 4' O 03 O 0- M N
r' >- C.) N M N N ti . O N.
I- W M N (
P
GC N O J
U
H O O O O O O O O O O O O O O
M I- Co O O O O O O O O O O O O
PP CU? .O In IA N •O 4! 0 CO O N M N
e- a a s N M N N N r O N
IL M 1.- N _ P
a' Al 0 N
P M N O 0 P P i 0 CI CO CO P
> ►- O J CO .-- M ti 1 J I
M .`O O Al N O M 4' 0
r P P .0
`O
0
a a a 0 a a a o 0 o O a a a 0
0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 P o 0 In o N 0 N CV C •O O In O .O O O •O
^ M N M a• oa in In
Y
O N
C a-
7
0
U
U J O O 3 O N N. M N O O O O
in
Cs in P0
la P Q N Al
m P P OMo
U
L
7 a7+ N
W 0)
U 'o 17 J O..t N P O in �O In N CO(n IA cn co�t O N- N- O O O O
O
N N CO
• a.
• 0 < -. .- ..t M O M 4 C.
L X M P
F- .O (.., — N
a W O. L) In co 03
L O < to
G1 w
a• 0
C
IL C
3
0
Y L
W a
_ U >
L co t W QC! I� C)
co J 2
C U a+ In
>uu L a W J U a N L U C
o
C. N i u
Y E • C N X W
C a+
U 4+ OE O W
C O I- L
C .
n • y < (/)
f 7 CO W U a a.' y
Q Y .. C \
O a• w co C
o U L 4. U CO
Ul op 0 co •.- co N U C — U >
co•U N L 0 C U N N N <
•C ate+ C -+ L 0 ot! N U 0) U 1.•0
C
tp
.0
•a+ CD U O -'O 7 7 C L C C 7 7 U W
LI
4-
U O S f U J f- O J ..
a a a 3
OC
W
O 1- p
CV <
O I- N M J M •N a 3 P P _ _ Al N s s In
IL M M M J v J 1 1 s J J J .t .T
,O 1 . S J J . 4 4 J J . 3 J P
•
'r
Z
& Q Y O O f.... c. O v N .O
U
.t .t P
Al
P a W O O ti O 0 co a LA an
O .t Al
D 11J ti �0 v IA N A n
J .t P
(Si
CV Al O O O P M
M P O P a co A
F M f O O
O CO CO- A z > , C IA
P P
N
O
N O a O 0 0 a �lO1 O v1
Q a cc
v1 .t O v1 (Si
c� 4-Al a _v1 V\ N
a+
P
C r
0
0
U
U O .0 O Al O O Al
Q 0 in 00 vii vii
.n - a s Ai s 3
M n
-0 L
7 a+
7 a+
LL 0)0
N 0 CO O D '0
p N
p p N
O Q 0 O .t
• W CO CO a P U
Q
W W .-
a+ 0
C
W C
3
0
Y
W 0 0
1
W L -.
L L a+
Co U I_
TL y
G1 G/ 0 ~ L
-, U G1
• a. - -, C
10 a+ 0 -J
O
W W I-
on 4.. p 0)O
0 ..-U F C C C CO 0 W
0) d L a N . �0. O C ••
C C CO U N W 7 Q U I- U O
•to C . C y W W — 2 a+ a+
a te U W W t)! 4, a+ "0 L -. a+0
CO W I- 7 a 4, O I.- O O
E CO Cl) a x a a.
OC
W
O H
Al .4C I i N P « O MO 2 Si- M CO _
LL _ Si V * in N IA v1 #
P .0 •t .t # .t .t .t .t # v 4t
.. .. .. .. .. .. ... .. .. II
2 II
M O 0 O O O O O O II
�Q±`` < O 00 00 CEO II
�' L3 0 N N in▪ II O
H W In •O in II
M .- �t N II
L/ . II
-4 II
11
11
II
H
I- 0 0 0 0 0 0 11
P I- H 0 0 0 LA 11
0 0 0 II
W II
C 3 In .N 0 W - •O in II
Cr M -4 N 11
1 II
11
II
.-. ... ... ... .-. .■ .-. .-. .-. II
II
II
II
II
II
II
(Si II
o U N P O 0 0 0 en rn N- II
M M N O CO CMO P 11
O ~ M ((QO
11
2 T .O O in CO CO N- II rn
c;..
Os v N en I I
O N▪ I I
H
II
a0 0 0 0 0 0 0 II
0 0 0 in II
a o o O in II
g- d 0 0 0 CO 11
Q M II
N r M CO 11
. II
3 N I I
0 II
I) II
U J .O .0 0 0 0 �f I
Q Q WI IA N II
U 11
▪ I I
N < 0 0 ti 11
U) in
L II
N II
7 4O+ Ul II
LL . 0 II
0 O O O O P II
V/ Q O < CO CO
11
L X M 1- N II
4 W O - U II
L P < N. N- M II
Y 0
• II
C N 11
W C II
3 II
0 II
II
Y II
U7 II
y II
L II
CO
4-i II
U II
2 0 II
_ II
O
U II
II L
10 0. W
4,
CO ar c CI) 0 II
O W 0 II
,4, U) N = d L CO 11
L U 2 .F I- I v N i-i II
11
Q N 0 4O- I.. .>. 11
~ ii
0 C 0 N 4+ 0 II
0 O ` II
L
II
. _U U w co C o H
II U y 1' .0 i,
11
co o
g L _
a a I- I- II co Y 8 II
°C a II
0 H
II
II`O CO 0 # 0 0 # < 1G * # I- II W
P .O -? �t # .t # N s # I- iI
II
•
X 0 O O ° O O O O 0
&` Q in O P. ,O 00 '0 N
>- U P O P N In PS
~... 04 N fn M
L)
pn )- N °O °O °O 0 °O °O °O °O 0
0^ 0.0. = in 0 P. .O at)a N
a- 0 0 P 0 P N an a`
L N M 1 M
N P 0 P tv 0 in a a M N
N 0
F
• • . . . . .O
Z • W1 CO N 00 N N•
P N CO
P
0
0.N O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
.0 A CO 40'3 Ill .O P P -O
r' 0 0 P M Q _ N P
a+
N N
C
0
0
U
Q Q O '3 CO 1 N In .t 0
o. U as O f` v r O• �O
Q 'O N N N 1
CO N
d
2 L
3
7 a+ CD
LL. .r O
0/
N 0 0 PP
1,- 0
N 0 O ? O . N N
.
X MP V P h 'O P. CV
Q.
0) 4- Q
a. 0
C
W C
3
0
Y
0)
0)
L CO
00 L V -.
CO .4- 4, N
aa C U in
'to _— O1 - >. m d L J
4-. > L as
0) 2 . y L W a+ 00 N 0.
O W E 10 ,... yEC C O n al
J 0) ~ 0) 0) E G7 01 C call C) W
Z 3 > ce 3 F - 3 N N Oa. --.03 in ce call J call cc - 0. < 3 E
tu N N p a in U)
•L •V •L .....
.. 0 D V U U
0 L L 0 L L L O ••_ ..-
N < 0 N 0 < < 0 0
IX
W
0
N W 0 O 0 0 # 0 N
0 N r M M J n #■ CV- _ _
# CV v S v v v J '.t
2
2 Q O O O O O o O a o a a a O
M D 2.. O O O O O O O O O O O O
P Q 00 O .O �t tel M •O IA O N O P
a- > c a- — I- M f• e- 1- O 00
1- W N M
... OC
U
I- O O O O O O O O a O O O O O
M .- N O O O O O O O O O O O O
P W 00 O •O .t M M .O M1 O N O P
PIL
D )Q r r r M !� ..- a 00
d' N M
MI N - F- O P o - M M O N P a s -
N ....t O 43 -t -t •O _
> F- O
•O
O M N �t N N
2 >- 1 N M
P P
O
a o o O o O a a a a a a a o 0
N O O O M V1 O O in 0 O O O O M
g a M F- �f 0p M N N O O N in 00
G .- N M M N O CO
a+
C
7
0
U
U J N 4'
~ M N 1 P N O O M N .O N-
MI e- N 0 N N IA 0. N O O N 0.
NI A e- U N a- M •Q
N Q M
U
L
C 7 ++
7 a+ 0!
LL 0) Lel
U 2 2 J M O•O f� P U) M 00 P_ O O I O M
U N O < N M M N O O
CO
. P L W M a M U
N
U v- r
Q
• 0
C
C
W C
3
0
Y N
co
U -. N C 07 N y fa
L a; L L .- ID
CO L
U O g_ C a a y — .a
C 7 U U a U RI
O_ N
..-H Q o L > N as U 4- y d
a+ I U W U •U ....
4, .O 7 - 07 U •a
U U N
U co w• Q7 OC N S L 7
D U -. U y C 'Q .-� C V) C aE Ca
a 7 U C a+ l0 L 'a 6J U)
co U Cl M C - co U X U •/q ,L U L
C_ _.. OI Ca Cr 7 C O O. C C N N O.
a+ -07 C L U LL U 2 c~ UU E a-. 4, CO
O.. „z 0 •U a.
0 0 7 E ,0 7 •P •a+ ~
O z V C' E Z J CA J H CO N
Cr
W
O 2
N W O N .t O M .'O O O M IA 4- O #
W N N N CV N N N N N N N N in N N N
P ,O S v S J 1 S J �t Nt -t -.t -t �t it
2
S C O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
& Q _ O It •O •Q ../. O 0 0 CD
> U N .- .t P N
1- W
•.• d'
U
I- 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 O 0 0 0
'0 0 N P a W 0 V %0 .t 0 N-
0 W -
5— 0 O N .- .t P .- N
W 5- 5-
ar
N N P 0 0 O 0 M 0 111 in .- 1!1 I!1
P 0 P '0 in In 0 CO M P M
M M M O O M P
H O
O i M .t VD f. N-
2 Y
P
P
0
N In 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 IOn 0 0 0 'O 0
PP O V1 M O M O N .t a.
.- a O — s .o
Q
C
0
0
U
U J M�pp 0 0 0 0 !� O O tel 0 .t
Q In P CO
O N M .- N p. F P
d
U .D .! '0 r- 0
N
a)
TL
7 s+
7 ++ d
,,,_ •.- Of 12 W J O O I 0 0
0 M I a O O J
N y
MI
0 < 0 P N M N M in
..- 13. p. H !�L X NI 0, •O M In ..-O. W P
L
w w .-
+, 0
C
W C
3
0
Y
�
CV
L 0)
L -8 C
at w
T cc
a Q a) an 12
Q C U G) >
= a7 O L L U)
+, Cr C d 2 d C U N 12
0 = 0 .-U In _ a) N •af a) a+ CC of
0 I a U •W 0 a) O U a •-
oil N N .-> C > L a) L a) a+
a) 1.- •- co - d U C an
U .-
L •C O) > > \ a1 .-
a) C L 1 U
CC N a) •C V) a) O) 0 In O a) a7 a)
W C i, In co M L 7 L L
N w 4- Y U a) a) —. a) 7
11 W < O. Z 0. W 11 I- U 0 ..
ar
W
0 =
N W 0 N .t In P 0 .t In VO CO 0 0
0 Cl) r _
tL M M M M M M M M M M CO M
S J .t J v .t .t J .t .t .t .t a •O
•
.. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ..
2
o 0 0 o O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
M a O f O O O O
O O O a O O O O
Q Q O O O .f M O M V r M P.
.-
>- L) M N N P M• N V1• CO
H w a- a- O 1
.. CL
U
!- O O O O O O O O O O O a O O
M 1- CO 0 O O 0 0 0 0 O O O O O
Os W w O O O 4 V1 O M in .- M 1.-
O
o 0 in N N P M N in CO
w a- 4- O -
12 a-
N N f� tel O O O CO .t N O M O N Cr N
P a P
1 O N - M O
F O M M in N
O e M O 0• a- a l!1• M
'
2 >- Os
O
a o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
N a O O O O O O O O O in M O
P C O O O ..f' to V1 in V1 M O
P a
a- 0. N N M P• N• ..... O• J
Q e- e- O .t
4/
C
7
0
U p. p pp�
Q a- Q M N 'O N O P .O Os f� O in O
> P M CO N M f� .t in O
4- U a- M .- V1• N
Q 4— — P .t
CO
0
L
'0
C 7
7 ++ W
W O 0
) HI
C) "O J t� O O O N CO .t O O .fit N O O
N W m7 pO.. Q V1- in N N O M
L X M Os H Os •• •O V1
a w P LI P M
C! w .-
4/ 0
C
w C
2
0
-0
-L
co L C
C) L L B C C
L W L W W
CO W 2 J 4/ E s
J co C Q/Cd)
O L J Q CO C L L
L Cr . CO C) W W
..-W
..-
W .a L �E1 WL qC� CO CO i N W wC CO
W N Cr C) a+ ,a E O W Cl 0 1-- E CO
co 4/ 4/ co >. O__ U OX. n Y N "'4000 4-,
w C 4/ 1 co 7 CO w CO 0. 4/ C
j C L CO i w o2) 0 C O U E N CW)
4-, •
E. 0 4.. >. 01) aa, Y °° a
O" •7 OC co V) >- U C) ea 7 \ H 4/
.-U W W co U T C) a) S C Cl) co
L C, 4/ C 4/ C L O o8 N U U
1 U) O E L 4/ W 0 0 7 7 U 7 7
w I CO V) U 7 E U J H 0 J 0. a
O C
w
O
0 co w ^ CO CN0 CC0 a0 P P — 4- •M- -4- 4- s s
W M M M M M M M .t S J .t .t .t .t
M MI v .t v v .t .t S v .t .r v v v v
0. MO
2
S O O O O O O O O �l0�11 O O
Q N 0O O O I� N P 1A 111 - *
•
> U M �1 O 'O 03
~ Li/ M N 1 M �O in
U
N N
H O O O O O O O O O O
M F- U) O O O O O O III y1 O
P W N to in O ..- O ..t "0 N
O• j
• O M OW 1 0 in M J
CC M Cfl J M
N N
P C P in 0 O N in to a M ,O P a
F O �t N CO J P
M ...T O IA 2 > O N P
P
O .-• N
a. a a N 0 O O 0 000 N O O O O 0
P C N O F- 03 M 0 M
P a
Q M M M LLC1• VI co fel
M N
a+
C N N
7
0
U
U G O O O O P O O O O O
00 43
d a- U N P
Q P 00
N a N
4 L N N
7 a+
7 a+ 0)
m
• 1• 2 13 O O O .t P
in O O O O O
N It) CO O < U
. a O
L M V o a
P Q
N w
a+ O N N
C
W C
2
0
10
Y (0
W > 0)
0) L L
L 0) L
m N U
N L
O_ 01 C~,)
_ L > T W
4+ N a• Q CO -+
CO CO 0) 0 J 0
Y M 0) I- N 1'
a C W o0 3 0 a.
N U 0) -J a+ C -' 0 U
U Q C 2 W co
a+ r L
g > C W A. •7 W o
cm rdj QE N U N 7 Q U H- U CT
cn d' W •W y C W W 2 a+
0) tr 4W+ V L - 4..,4.., U
U) 01
L 0) 3 I- 7 Y O I- c_
W
3 I- J X m 0 f a.
C
CCl
O 3 y1
cm w � '0 N C- O
0 N in * CO #
LL v 4' � J it in K1 N * 'O
cm ..t S 1 d * d -t -t * -t P
z i
M Z 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 n
a 6 co u
Y U co• II
H W 11
LA 11
C.1 11
M II
II
ii
II
NI
p� F- I- 0 0 0 0 O O II
O• a w
W H
0 Oo co U
w II
CY 1n 11
. 1
M 11
11
11
1
II
II
II
II
II
II
(Si II
..1. 0 0 0 O II P 0 1/1
0 (Si
N O 11
> ~ M •O U) II
Z >- M 1 II
P O M II
O N 11
11
11
II
N O 0 0 0 O O O 11
II
& a an
CO ▪ II
▪ O. O 11
a II
J
P 11
C (Si II
O 11
U _ _ II
U Q 0 0 0 O O i1trt1 1 II
1
T O• P h u
.O .- v n. N. to• ii
N a (Si (Si f` II CV (NJ
411
- 11
V L (Si 11
7 ++ 0 H
H
LL of H
0 12 '8 0 0 0 0 0 U) 11
0 4) al 0 ? N (Si 0 II at.a X P .- U 1 1 0 II
L Os a (Si (Si .O II
Y 0 N II
C
II
w C II
0
3 II
Jc 11
H
COd
H
11
L 11
[L U 11
U 11
4) 4) U I I
15 C L II
C C W
41 z 11
0 w 0 w O u
U. L .... II
4) b+ N 4) U)•-• It
> I
7 a 4) I
co W L pC V C 11
3▪ 41 O -J C I- O 1- u) II
0 L _ ti
U U 4- 00 1- II
11) Y _) (I) t+ 11
co C 0 11
•O •O 4+ l0 H I-Z 11
L L 0 L 11
d 0. I- 1- O II
z Ii
cc a II
O 3 -J II
(Si w M •O 4. O 4. a II
I M (Si v s v I-- I
P •O 11
X 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N& Q `Q in P O
I- W ONO P N a
IX
U
__ H
I- 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
131, 0.W O ILI `O V1 C> 0 co
0- 0 0 ONO Cr. N U
OL■ M U 0 v � 0 0 0 0 P O0 SO P v> - O u1 O P CU
Z 1 Ni Ni N Ni N I- Ni
Q N
P
0
N 0 0 0 N O 0 0 0 0 0 0
O. OC P .O 1.1
f� 0
O. a
`" < a-N P N to N
C
C
7
0
U c15
03 IN
U in N '0 N Ni U)
CO Q M VI
a)
10 f-
C
7 a
7 4., )
LL rn 0
(1) g 2 J U M 111_ P_ 0 a �/N1 O O
U) C7 CO Qs 0 < N N P. N N
•L �XX pM. P V M e- M -t co
O. P U)
.■ 0
Q
C O
C
W C
3
O
Y
a7
a) >.
L L U)
co L W 4. CO
CO L .� CO
N 7 a7 w U N
•4 C U /- > co a) ,L J
N
0 - w E W CO c U) CO a en _ — op y — U) v
N a) ►- 7 a) g E C a] y m
Z 3 > C 3 I- •' 7 N N a) .a
N M a) . i+ CO L H
�8 a) C a, C a H
W W
ce N J U)
al y 'spy -p a 0. y C
2
cm 1 L 4, L a+ ' 4W+ 4)i a+
a CO U a`, CO a`) co co 0 w "a
0 N co > co > co a o 0
f
ac
O O
N I- 0 CV O O O * O Ni
0 N Ni Ni .t V1 *
tL
Ni ..t .mot .St .t •t .t ■t 4c .Nt .Nt
•
.. .■ .. .. .. .. .. .. ... .. .. .. .. ..
2
x O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
M O Y 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Q Y N 3 N r 3 1,- c V M M O
.-
>- 4-) CO — in IA IA N
I- W
••■ C[
C-)
I- 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
M H N 0 0 0 0 0 O O O 0 0 0 0 0
0, W j (Si �t (Si .- v 1- I!1 M M 0
O 0 COS .- IA IA in (Si
W
oc
3 0 co a O 0 c. 0 0 0 0 0 O (Si i M
I .- M (Si Is-
CD 0 F. M
N--
Z Y
U P
0
O_ O O O O O O O O
CV 0 0 O 0 O oO N 1 0 OV O p �t U a N N N N 0•- O_ 0 M 3 0 P
Q M
N
C
7
0
C..) pp
1 0 0 0 IA 0 Q Q O (Si 0 0 P
Q±` O IA N N N N N
./2 .- Q (Si 0) (Si
y
0)
L
•Q
C .j a
3 i+ 01)
LL 0 12 '3 N J 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4f1 0 0 0
CO IO CO p0 Q (Si f�
I-
C_ W P P U
P a
IL v- .-
C▪ 0
C
W C
3
0
'0
Y
l0 y
0) �. N y y 4,
CO co L V V
U
a) CL a m W
C •3 L a. a co
.W 0) > w L ' 0) a. 0) L
N O) 0) y l0 07
0) y 0) .4- 07 = a) 0) W U a f
O co 0) U V(0 C a+ OIC cc a
p� �g+ K. E 3 rn
ZN 0 a U aL) �i _ �i y y ot) L a
vii E tUn n.
a) 0) K all Q •3 .-3 a) ay+ 0 J 0 N
C7 C •C LL _�.. C W W W c l0 I- ea .3
Q 0) M. 00 CO U U a.
Z W - J •
cre 0) •- 4' 0 L -, W C O O p - 7 5 LO a E y E • 0 E L 4-1+
O Ck 0 LL Z I.) Z N LL E J H U N N
S
Or
O 0
(Si H U) 0 (Si 3 (Si 3 IA sO 0 J in N-
C V) (Si (Si N (Si M M M M M 3 Si' V1 VI
U. (Si (Si (Si (Si (Si (Si (Si (Si (Si (Si (Si (Si (Si (Si
P 3 3 .T 3 3 Si' 3 Si' 3 3 Si 3 3 Si'
E a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O
a om i 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
O O J N J
Y C.1 CV CV in O N J N e-
I- W C J N M N
•C.. C[
U
t- O O O 0 O O O O O O O O
N1 1- 4) O O O O O O O O O O
o a W CO U1 gr. O O J N J
0 W
0 0 i- J ..-- N M N N r
Cr
I N O O v J O O P 0 0 in _ CO P
> )- O CO
M P
Z Y M O .M-
P P
O
0.N 0 O .O CO a O O )O C. a O O O
0. a o in 0 co °o
a � ti ti o F r`
M N
C
7
0
U
U -j 1- M N -O O O 1- in O J re)
Q Q N P M N P ^ N N
T p.P O M O N CO m M
Q N 1 N N CO M
CO
C)
.
7 L
7 a+
LL �C
'p -p a J M M •O M m N O 1- O
CO C 7 J CO in .,O M
.U1 CO O < )/') 2O .O .Of .J- a CO
a W U - U re). N J e- f�
C) w .- 6
A+ O
C
w C
3
O
73
Y
co
C)
L y C)
m C)
Q c
d = W CO C)) - o u 2
U L C C 2 > C)
' y O7a
C) C L C m
N L 0 W N S D W 0. Y. y CZ
a SC l— d L U co a c 0)
c
N cd N h (a N U > > p 4..
> C L V) U U U U U) j •
N a C.) ..-> > •> ..-> N 0 C) Q a C)
CO >. > C) CO C) C) 0) C) 0 CO -+ C
Q ^ co CC N N N V) C C) .0 CO co co
2 - i+ W a
0 (i) w w '4- v- Y N N N C) 7
Q I- 0 0 0 0 V) N L C N
CC Y L L L L
o 0 a a a a � 0 4-a La
I
a
O 0
G y 0 * O_ N_ M_ in M O 1� a O
LL N 'k M M M M M M M M NI in M M
J # J J J J J J J J J J P
Z
Z a o o O o o O O O O O O O O 0
M 0 f O O O O O O O O O O Co O
Q C M r‘.. .O N .o N M O ►�
Y 0 If', .-• N N .- IN P
I- w M N M
.. GC
U
I- O O O O O O O O O O O O O O
N1 H CO O O O O O O O O O O O O
Qs O. w O a- M h .o N .O N tel O 1.-
P W
a W M N N N — CNJ P
M
oe
N N .0 O O O O M O O O O .0 O O o
P O P to 1.01 ...3.CO 0
f- .
O Y M O� r MI
o
P P
O
CL O o O o o O o 0 0 0 o O o O
PO O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
P d O O O o N tf1 N V1 N M O CO
Q M • N IA N-
M
Y
C
7
0
U
O O .QQ A O M a O Q Q N O t O N ON
P -
• U IA M r M N
Q .T N
N 1.-
p a,
C
7 a7. a,
W 'p 'pO, a
W G 7 O Q 00 a a N It', N M O M O O O ....1. `0
00 M
a X pM. & U
P Q
a, w
• 0
C
C
W C
3
0
Y
a, L
0)
L.
C 2 C N
a,
T U co
N L J C
co
co
..t-p In •> U
83 cn a, cc a.,pp` 16 QEC� O Cl)p� QEC1 C xa7 E •C N
a CO Q! a .0 O_ W .O N E
J C . •7 co W L a 1.. Q Q 7 L.
w otJ rn a. E E +T• U
2
4-' •7 co T.CO ad so 4,a+ a, _a o. S r-. ..J
W •U a- N L C 0 Cl) Cl) 4,"g O O a
C7 •.- in T a a, f C a, . o a,
2 ate. -. y +'' C d 0 ea Cl) L ` x
a 0 .0 L — U c U a+ aa,, U :: .D .0
ce
o .• 4. CO 0 0 7 7 0 7 a.1
a w I N 7 I U J I-- O -J 3 a 0 I-
I
. o
O 0
CV y ^ CO U P a- N M 5- a- O O O N
W M M Cl-', M M J N.S. J .1 .t .Mt .fit S f
P 1 s s s s s s s s s s s s s s
M 0 f 0 0 0
& 5 O
N N
I•- W O N O a- U
.-. CC N M J
U 0
N 0 0 O O 0 0 2*. O ti CD N Os 0.. tal e- O IO CO N 0 -* N
C N
Cal N 0
.t N 0
• P P P M N 0
h- O .- N
o y M M p IA IA
P
P 'O
O
0.CV
. O M a O O 0 0 0
P a 0 0 O 0
C N O OO
'- G CO P N N Cal J r
C
0
O
u
OK a -t o o 0 0
P U P M
U)
G N
II)
2 Is
7 a+ N
IL 0
N -2
-J
0 0 P`0
0 0 0
CO y CO 0 a cra
. 1,-..
a W P ,_ U
P a
IL so- .
♦•
0
C
W C
3
0
•0
Y Vj
W 01
0) C..
L t
co U
L
O N
H L y
V
C 0< 'W O J U a`� J
ai F +, ce
0 0 0. W O
U)
C U < C C l0 �_ _ G
a .'
U CO 0) L
CI
C 0) L d a N a+
• J a N N C..) Q W V y 0 C
0 0 CO W a Z U a U a.. m °I 0 U u N 0 L _. a+ d 0 CO 0
- O a � L .0 H O L a+ 0
0
0 J N 0 E Cl. Cl. I-
X
ce
O 0
0 u) 1 n • 0 co # M `. •#
�{ #
P 1 1 1 4I .4t .4t # ..t J #
•
•- «- -. II 11
II
II
II II 0 O O Cl o II
a II II
IA
II
r' r U 1• 11 0 11
1- W O 11 1!1 I1
J 11 NS I1
U I1 . II
It O
II
II II
... •-• •• II .+ II
II II
Mp. F N 0 O II O II
P d W O II CO 11
W = CO II CO 11
a- 0 0 1\ 11 Op II
W O II N II
OC 1 II d II
11 . II
II O 11
11 II
I1 II
... •-• II - II
II
I1
11 II
II 11
I1 II
11 II
II II
II II
II I P a 0 0 h
II p
N II -.t II
.1 II O II
o I M 0 II 0 II H
z P
O II p 1P u O ...t
II II
II II
II
II
0 0 O II O 1N O N- II P ii
P Cl • II
II
a
II II
a s i o
Y M II M II
C II I1
7 II 11
It It
U
II
II
U J
II
II
a a N- ,..7.- ° i N- ii
> U 1 v II .O 11
_ _ U
II in I
11
Q �t -t .- II M II
N
0 M II 0 II
II
L II 'O II
7 W II II
U- 0) II
H
H
o 2 "3 J 0 0 0 I1 0 11
Is- II
o a m o Q 1 11 •0 II
Ll W M P U
L. 0 a N. II - II
II II
CI C• 0 . II
II
In II
W C II II
3 II
II
C II 11
.D II H
y II II
l0 11 II
II II
L 11 II
II 11
CO II H
II II
2 11 II
II
LL II II H
11 11
Y
II
II
H
al 03 0 2 11 II
O 11 II
ii
C W H II 11
N 11
° II c > II a U o W 0 II H
4' I_ II II
W U L I- CO H N I1
G w W = II S E l i
H 11 H 11
., N C 0
11 II
ce or I- II II
O I- I- 8 11 8 II
E <II < II
cr
II 11
0 0 O # Q II J II
N
4 II
0 y
# I-- ii H II
IT N. # 0 11 0 II It
II
■
•
.-. .. .-. .. .. — .. II
II
z 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 II
Pil
°a °o o° 00 1°n .0O ° ° II
>- V N J CO NI .0 J J II
I- W
N. 10 N 1� 1� II
r N N II
U II
II
II
I- 0 O O O O O O II
g,` ~ CO 0 0 O �O, O O O II
O_ W ,O II
w
•- 0 0 N J CO In .O J J 1i
N-
W 1,-- M N N. ti 11
N N II
II
II
II
H
... .-. .-. .-. ... ... .-. II
II
II
II
II
H
11
II
II
NI CV 0 N 0 0 CI, N. II 0 P J
O 1- 01 O J M t!1 II
• 11
M M t Z �" P .- N lO iII
II
II
II
II
ii
0
N 0 0 l J". 0 O 0 _0 0 11
it
Q 0. O
N. O O M II
acnr a . . . '"• u
O. N N II
Q M M N CO CO 11
N N II
4' II
7
H
0 II
U II
Q p. < M 0 0 0 00 0 O II
XI P V J M M 11 pn
N in P P• II
a `r � II
v' II
FL II
L II
7 4T W II
W . p0 H
H
W 7 J 0 0 O V1 V1 II
CO IV CO 0 Q P e- ^ II
C pp. II
L X M P r II
a. W P U N 00 00 II
P Q CO
y .F II
4+ 0 II
C II
W C I I
3 II
0 II
-D II
Y II
W C II
C
13 re
II L
II W a' 4' N U 11 O t t O) L
Q Q Of
d II
"'• = J J CO
L 11
•W _ II
II
W z U co C O 11
0 = C L 0) °i0 O 11
O II
O Y. CO CO 4-'' < U N II
<1 N J _U II
M II
_ > II
_ 0 II
II
0 U > 4-. >.
• ♦-. N N II
..Z L U U 0 O •.• II
CI .... . . = II
I- Or N 1... L co U /0 I- II
= W 4, 4, 4' II
0 N V- U U
..J LL �U-. -U. ..-Y 7 ~ Z II
0. w w 0 0. 8
I" I 11
W Q II
La
O I I
N f-
J I I
0 N M
N. H1 P S 411 0 II
P d v v v v # I- II
MEMO TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCILMEMBERS
FROM: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES
DATE: NOVEMBER 2, 1992
SUBJECT: ADDITIONAL INFORMATION FOR NOVEMBER 5,1992 CITY COUNCIL
MEETING
There are no additional support documents to be included with the November 5 regular City
Council agenda packet.
/S/ Thomas L. Hedges
City Administrator