08/18/1992 - City Council Regular ::../,'/
AGENDA
GULAR MEETING .'' ' -
WAGAN CITY COUNCIL �
/
EAGAN, MINNESOTA :v`°`--- --
MUNICIPAL CENTER BUILDING
AUGUST 18, 1992 e
6:30 P.M. 3
0",N.
b C C)
I. 6:30 - ROLL CALL & PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE (BLUE)
(\i)
II. 6:35 - ADOPT AGENDA & APPROVAL OF MINUTES (BLUE)
III. 6:45 6:45 - DEPARTMENT HEAD BUSINESS (BLUE)
A. FINANCE DEPARTMENT
es l 1. Receive Bids/Award Sale of General Obligation Improvement Bonds, General Obligation
Equipment Certificates of Indebtedness, and General Obligation Refunding Improvement
Bonds
i7. 2 2. Consideration of Revised False Alarm Program
B. POLICE DEPARTMENT .
el, S 1. Hunting Permits
IV. 6:55 - CONSENT AGENDA (PINK)
p. f0 A. PERSONNEL ITEMS
(A B. LICENSES, Tree Contractor, B & J Tree Care, Savage MN
_J
111PC. ELECTION Judges for September 15 Primary
/n. LICENSE, Shows/Solicitor for Mitch Knoll/Haunted Hayride
:20 E. REQUEST from Dakota County for Compost Site Lease Extension
,.22.-;.F. RECEIVE Assessment Roll/Order Public Hearing, Delinquent Bills
` G. CONSIDERATION of Wetland Replacement Proposal for Alscor Investors Joint Venture #2
il9
in Eagandale Industrial Park #4 E
r n 33 H. RECEIVE Bids/Award Contract for Construction of Pumper Truck, Fire Departmen r'
I. FINAL PLAT, Lakeview Trail Addition " . : 2
P710 J. PROJECT 639, Receive Feasibility Report/Order Public Hearing (Aldrin Drive - Streets'
„ `� & Utilities yy -
.3 '� PROJECT 632, Agreement with Soo Line Railroad (Weston Hills Utility Crossing) - �%
8 L. VACATE Utility & Drainage Easement, Receive Petition/Order Public Hearing (Deerw0000 H
n 3 School Addition) ,'
.e, „ M. VACATE Utility & Drainage Easement, Receive Petition/Order Public Hearing (Outlot A
�Q Coventry Pass Addition)
P/ J) N. PROJECT 640, Receive Petition/Authorize Feasibility Report (St. Thomas Becket Addition
- Utilities)
p, 0. VACATE Utility & Drainage Easement, Receive Petition/Order Public Hearing (Lot 8,
Block 2, Woodlands North Addition)
QQ 6 P. EXTENSION of Final Plat, The Woodlands North Second Addition
C1 "11� .3 Q. CONTRACT 92-02, Approve Final Payment/Acceptance (Blackhawk Cove - Sanitary Lift
Station)
V. 7:00 - PUBLIC HEARINGS (SALMON)
40111k A. PROJECT 636, Poppler Addition - Streets & Storm Sewer
1
1
I
VI. OLD BUSINESS (ORCHID)
•
VARIANCE, Richard Skinn, of 20' to the Rear Yard Setback Requiremenand a VARIANCP of 50' to the Required 100' Setback from Property Zoned Agricultural; a VARIANCE of
7' to the Required 20' Side Yard Setback; and a VARIANCE to the Curb and Gutter and
Paving Requirements for Lot 1, Block 2, Halley' s 1st Addition, Located in the SE 1/4
rcA. S ection 3CONTRACT 92-09, Receive Bids/Award Contract (Great Oaks and Woodlands North 2nd
Addition - Streets & Utilities)
tC. CONTRACT 92-10, Receive Bids/Award Contract (Weston Hills - Trunk Utilities)
1I. NEW BUSINESS (TAN)
J, VII.
RECERTIFICATION for Entitlement, v
t, Community Development Block Grant Funds 1
ti'r, --IOC) RECOMMENDATION, Dakota County HRA, Federal Reserve Bank, Property Acquisition
�/ q C. COMPREHENSIVE IDAN AM , . h Becket . hoI Church, From D-I GU(SE inglePL -Family ENDMENT Residential)St T and omas D-II (Mixed Addition Residential)/StT , a mas REZONING Becket
�,
from AG (Agricultural) to PF (Public Facility) and a PRELIMINARY PLAT Consisting of i
Approximately 33.1 Acres for a Church Located Along the West Side of Highway 3, South
of Diffley Road in the SE 1/4 of Sec 25
(��D. PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AMENDMENT, Jerald W. Peterson, Changing the Use from a Medical
V center/Office Building to a Motel on Lot 2, Block 2, Rahn Cliff 3rd Addition Located
Along Rahn Cliff Court in the NW 1/4 of Sec 32
SE. PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AMENDMENT, Brinker International, Changing the Use from Retail to
Qt a Class I (Sit Down) Restaurant and CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS to Allow On-Sale Liquor,
3.2 Beer or Wine, and a Pylon Sign on Lot 2, block 1, Duckwood Crossings, Locate.
Along the West Side of Pilot Knob Road in the SE 1/4 of Sec 16
F'�1�r F. BUILDING PERMIT Prior to Platting Property, Toby T. Stevens, Government Lot 7, Section
e" 18, Township 27, Range 23
4( G. ORDINANCE AMENDMENT, City of Eagan, to Chapters 2, 11, and 13 of the City Code
7,t 1 Regarding Code Enforcement Officers .
VIII. ADDITIONAL ITEMS (GOLD)
/ j A. CONSIDER Claim for Expenses Regarding Vacation of Drainage and Uitlity Easement (Lot
6, Block 1, Lakeside Estates
IX. LEGISLATIVE/INTERGOVERNMENTAL AFFAIRS UPDATE (GREY)
X. ADMINISTRATIVE AGENDA (GREEN)
XI. VISITORS TO BE HEARD (for those persons not on agenda)
XII. ADJOURNMENT
The City of Eagan is committed to the policy that all persons have equal access to its
programs, services, activities, facilities and employment without regard to race, color,
creed, religion, national origin, sex, disability, age, marital status or status with regard
to public assistance. Auxiliary aids for persons with disabilities will be provided upon
advance notice of at least 96 hours. If a notice of less than 96 hours is received, the City
of Eagan will attempt to provide such aid.
ri
> a.�
/..( r
MEMO TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCILMEMBERS
FROM: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES
DATE: AUGUST 13, 1992
SUBJECT: AGENDA INFORMATION FOR THE AUGUST 18, 1992 CITY COUNCIL
MEETING
After approval is given to the August 18, 1992 City Council agenda, the regular meeting
minutes of the August 4, 1992 meeting and the special meeting minutes of July 21, 1992, the
following items are in order for consideration.
IMPARTMENT HEAD BUSINESS
A. FINANCE DEPARTMENT
Item 1. Receive Bids/Award Sale of General Obligation Improvement Bonds, General
Obligation Equipment Certificates of Indebtedness, and General Obligation Refunding
Improvement Bonds--At the July 21, 1992 City Council meeting, a resolution was approved
setting a sale date of August 18, 1992, at 12:00 noon, for the purpose of selling bonds to
finance current improvement projects to be specifically assessed, to refund two existing
special assessment bond issues and to finance the equipment certificate portion of the 1992
equipment revolving fund capital equipment purchases. Specifically, the issues are as
follows: 1) General Obligation Improvement Bonds, Series 1992B in the amount of
$3,540,000. This issue will finance fifteen improvements which are currently in various
stages of completion. The projects are expected to be assessed in 1992 and 1993. 2) General
Obligation Equipment Certificates of Indebtedness,Series 1992C in the amount of$400,000.
3) General Obligation Improvement Refunding Bonds, Series 1992A in the amount of
$5,440,000. This issue will provide for a current refunding of the $4,650,000 improvement
bonds of July 1, 1986, and for an advance crossover refunding of the $13,400,000
improvement bonds of October 1, 1988.
The official statement schedules the official award at the beginning of the City Council
meeting on Tuesday, August 18, 1992. The fiscal consultant from Springsted and the
Director of Finance will be present at that time to present and recommend the favorable
awards.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: 1) To approve the favorable bid for
General Obligation Improvement Bonds, Series 1992B, in the amount of$3,540,000. 2) To
approve the favorable bid for General Obligation Equipment Certificates of Indebtedness,
Series 1992C in the amount of $400,000. 3) To approve the favorable bid for General
Obligation Improvement Refunding Bonds, Series 1992A, in the amount of $5,440,000.
I
Agenda Information Memo
August 18, 1992 City Council Meeting
Item 2. Consideration of Revised False Alarm Program—Enclosed on pages 3 through
ris a copy of a memo from Administrative Assistant Witt concerning the City's current
false alarm program. The false alarm program has been reviewed by representatives of the
Police Department and City Clerk's office. The memo summarizes their review and also
presents a number of alternatives for Council consideration.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To consider revising the City of Eagan's
current false alarm program. If revision is desired, to approve one of the alternatives
presented by the representatives of the Police Department and City Clerk's office.
•
August 11, 1992
TO: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES
FROM: ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT WITT
RE: FALSE ALARM PROGRAM
Eagan's current false alarm program was instituted in 1984
and needs to be updated. The brochure is obsolete and the
need for various forms has been questioned. Representatives
from the Police Department and City Clerk's office reviewed
the brochure & forms, City ordinance, procedures, number of
false alarms and other communities false alarm programs. We
recommend that the Council review the false alarm program
and take action to leave as is or make revisions .
The current program allows for six free false alarms in a
calendar year . The seventh alarm and subsequent alarms
thereafter are assessed a fine. The residential fine is
$50 and commercial fine is $75.
The number of recorded false alarms has increased signifi-
cantly in recent years The increase appears to be in the
number of calls fewer than six. Fine revenue is down some-
what but most revenue comes at year's end so its too early
to tell .
No. of calls
Year No. of calls . .greater than' 6 Fine Revenue
1989 945
1990 1218 68 $5050
1991 1382 62 . $4650
1992 1005 y.t .d. 14 y.t.d. $1050 y.t.d.
Only two users with false alarm calls greater than six have
been identified as residential.
A review of other communities ' alarm programs provides the
following information:
City No. of free alarms Fine
Apple Valley 4 $50 - residential &
commercial
Burnsville no program
Coon Rapids 3 graduated increases
Lakeville 3 $25 - If 4 and 5
$50 - more than 5
Minnetonka 3 $50 - ,residential &
commercial
Plymouth .1 $50 - residential &
commercial
The committee suggests several alternatives for Council
consideration:
1 . Retain program as is.
2. Retain six free false alarms and raise the fine to
$75 - residential and $100 - commercial
3. Reduce to three free false alarms and leave the
fine as is: $50 - residential and $75 - commercial
4 . Reduce to three free false alarms and have a single
fine of $75 which would apply to residential or
commercial .
•
1-L■11111=1■111■111111=1M1■1
Agenda Information Memo
August 18, 1992 City Council Meeting
B. POLICE DEPARTMENT
Item 1. Hunting Permits--The issuance of hunting permits in the City of Eagan was
discussed by City Councilmembers in the regular meeting of August 4, 1992. Since that
meeting, the City has received three applications for special hunting permits. These
applications are respectively from 1) Norm Svien of 1989 Shale Lane for property located
on the north side of Yankee Doodle between Highway 149 and Mike Collins Drive for
property owned by Gopher Smelting and Refining Company. The request is for bow
hunting of white tail deer. 2) Marvin A. Bohnett of 180 62nd Way N.E. in Fridley for three
different property locations, those being 3370 Lexington Avenue, 975 Yankee Doodle Road
and 3240 Lexington Ave. The application is for hunting deer with a bow and arrow. 3) Jon
Yanta, Tim Yanta and Jim Yanta of Minneapolis;Bill Kieffer and Lou Kieffer of Eagan;
Scott Fredricksen of Rosemount; Mike Regnier of Eden Prairie and Tim Mumane of
Richfield for property owned by Joseph Kennelly in the Nicols Station area in Section 18.
The application is to hunt deer, ducks, geese and pheasants with bow and arrow and
shotgun.
Enclosed for the Council's information on pages 6 through. 9 are copies of the three
applications. The Council will note that the landowners' permission is attached to the first
application. The landowner's signatures are written under item four of the second
application. The City has not yet received landowner's permission for the third application.
Supposedly, that will be furnished by the applicants prior to the meeting. If the permission
is not received prior to the Council meeting, this application should be continued.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny special hunting
permits for: 1) Norm Svien for hunting white tail deer with bow and arrow; 2) Marvin A.
Bohnett for hunting deer with bow and arrow; and 3)Jon Yanta,Tim Yanta,Jim Yanta, Bill
Kieffer, Lou Kieffer, Scott Fredricksen, Mike Regnier and Tim Mumane for hunting ducks,
geese and pheasants with bow and arrow and shotgun.
•
SPECIAL HUNTING PERMIT REQUEST
FOR THE PURPOSE OF WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT ,
[At 'u,
1. Names M b y /,V /1 ,. 1 6 i/ 6 '2 s 7 x - 03 7
- - --__-------- —- ® Code:
Street Address: �P • , -A Ai 55 3
1,, :s : . ..II LI II : u . e 11 s : 114 . % . . 01 •
of eve acres or more nix and a000d'av icultaral.' Hunted wildlife shall
be deer Applications considered for parcels and �pd�to this policy will be the peeropdve of the Eagan
City goose,duck,pheasant and partridge only. coincide Cam, The ma:dmum dates of the season for each wildlife bunted shall
�'.at its diseeettoa,reduce the established
season for
the Minnesota t of Natural Resources (DNR). The Eagan bunting se in for
Department the Eagan City Coundl may deny any application for special
perm the DNR season. even if the applicant bas complied with all of the i
permit does not serve the purposes of wildlife management,
ifitai igt-intg slitrist_A aC z
---- _ this pit
on): ,
s Name (written permission from the property owner must aocamriRp=„""" ! ` ti,on
4. Property ►ti, rh �N r� .3y' • �4,.�,4-Q,c� C� . �
cu 5E - -
ti�■ r—r``' — —
1 i4cre5
S. Property Location Description' — A (r?.ti, �^'►4 • - 2- f '�`U
7s rC C t fwd(c Pd Ci4•G-4' ` irig 5s/? /
I i / E 4U 40.,/
to be Hunted: 7. Specific Hunting Dates: P S
5. Type of Geer: 0
beet- b y �76� 4/ 0 L tiz- t-1 i' fi�
IDENTIFICATION OF ALL HUNTERS IN HUNTING PARTY -- —
9 Address: 0 6a�Nr/Amy /U E 10.Vehicle
Al AP V 11`1 A, goktic-Tr' (�, Name (Beginning with the Applicant): Cj r /8 54.5-f3 � License #f
ZGo
1
Date: 13• �r'a
11. Police Approval/Permit No: Approval Date: Date+
(C7 .
AUG 10 '92 14 46 SHELARD GROUP P.2/2
•
SPECIAL HUNTING 1'ERM1T REQUEST
FOR THE MJRPOSE OF WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT
•iw1.1e S o we Ar`ti'er T A . .A^Ir4.
& Strut Addy a a. 00/60114/74 Coda
2i2.1 Er.*;a4;\ Are - S Mt 1S W OS Ma Sri/ /4
•
IMPORTANT INFORMATION FOR TlE APPLICANT
SNoY6wl. shall
kA deer .g duck beaeaatt sad partridge�'. Davits''la this policy war pwo�n of the Lagos
City Cooseit. The yardarms dates of the 211111011 for each Midllk boated shall colotide with the busting dates oitabltibod by
the Minsasots Department of Natural Rssourus CONE). The Saps City Quad!may,at its discretio4 reduce the sum for
ad rapeseed pamlt within the DNR Rasa. Ms Laps City Carnal wiry duty sal application for special handing if the
parish does not eetre the purposes etwadi&morsagenemt,os If the applicant boa oeatplisd with al of tie rsquirlmmta.
_..1' _ 3•. . • ., / . -.- '1' fl. .41. 54':I _ / '� 1 . '1• 1 �•J•� _. 1- •f.. 1. 1' '.i' :■ 1
Mdeat:catloa uu.t be carried at all tlmethr verification by the Lapa Pollee Department,
4. Property Owse�a Name(wrings pertatlasioa from the propel owner swat nsom tibia on):
PaaD' Persil application):
tt 51,P IN AM/t * 11 wt:> 4'awTt; (4)4- r 742. 74) ac trovi
hrepertyLocation Dea4ptions /JIGeis S-rot?/a'N, Tit 'Sjc'nM /S %ourolSi+P 27
1L —2 3
f. 'type at Game to hs Ranted: b f i i DM c k s 7. Speeltic RaattoP Danz 14.P 4018E4 1 a't 1!'1g
Gtz,c ..r4 PkAsok rrS /600 i AsAaelo lg.& 31st I/12,
f1�i•T 6ttX .
IDENTIFICATION OF ALL HUNTERS IN HUNTING PARTY
$. Nave (Rego risg with the Applicant): !. Address: IL Vehiek
/Adr/t- Ztt7 %"rj Ara. S jioeese
ram Wee, ...►s — St'Vl1. ¢8l •GR.L
6 i ll 2116 EAtre. d ZAN& Sy — 141. t
*VA* 1
c wt SP,
rGc,t�st� 3&45- Jet:t1► S4' w, slltZ Sq.& -lA6
s R,k•s.J y ' Mir s
Asti. JZ.C.`pKg- tl000 id.7b ti. of. 9$g •'EL b
7t� Au.tiO4.4E. f'tye mr.‘sw... ;n" Si T
U. folks AD New 12. Approval Data 1S. >ihplrstioa Data
'6 Nizeta JO A.110 Wd9t:10 264
l/0 i
•
SPECIAL HUNTING PERMIT REQUEST
FOR THE PURPOSE OF WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT
L Alamo: J(�
rrr_ ai"#
2. Street Address: 3. City/State/Zip Code:
/ ,/ J /e Z 1, , .,. Am,■, 5-s/2 2—
IMPORTANT INFORMATION FOR THE APPLICANT
Applications will be considered for parcels of property Olive ages or isoreppix and nosed°apie ran.' Heated wildlife shall
be deer(biome),goose,duck,pheasant and partridge only. Exceptions to this policy will be the prerogative of the Eagan
City Commit The maximum dates of the season for each wildlife busted shall coincide with the bunting data established by
doe Minnesota Department of Natural Resources(DNR). The Laps City Council may at its discredoa,reduce the season for
each requested permit within the DNR season. The Zaps City Council may deny any application for special bunting if the
permit does not serve the purposes of wildlife management,eves if the applicant has complied with all of the requirements.
apv hunter listed in this application may hunt only when accompanied by the applicant A eonv of this permit and appropriate
identification must be carried at all times for verification by the Ern Police Department.
4. Property Owner's Name (written permission from the property owner must accompany this permit applkadoa):
6IA e fie 11.-7,.-L,
P
S. Property Location Description: /7' /
/r °r/ s i�C o �o-^ re I r /-w r tr.- wy. /Ce r 04-
0. Type of Game to be Hunted: 7. Specific Hunting Dates:
•
-- _ TT
IDENTIFICATION OF ALL HUNTERS IN HUNTING PARTY
fi. Name (Beginning with the Applicant): 9. Address: 10.Vehkk
/79f 5L/� unease#f
P 137
9,
•
•
•
11. Police Approval/Permit No 12. Approval Date: 13. Expiration Data
•
(612) 454-3310
Ctf!!=='
GOPHER SfflELTIflG & REFIflIflG CO.
Manufacturers
LEAD PRODUCTS
3385 So. Hwy. 149
Eagan, Minnesota 55121-2395
August 4, 1992
TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN:
Mr. Norman Svien has the permission of Gopher Smelting & Refining to
bow hunt on their land for the 1992 bow-hunting season.
S •,s
n Ta• •e
•
JT:mp
•
r
Agenda Information Memo
August 18, 1992 City Council Meeting
PIONST:44MW
There are seventeen (17) items on the agenda referred to as Consent Items requiring one
(1) motion by the City Council. If the City Council wishes to discuss any of the items in
further detail, those items should be removed from the Consent Agenda and placed under
Additional Items unless the discussion required is brief.
PERSONNEL ITEMS
A. PERSONNEL ITEMS:
Item 1. Seasonal Park Maintenance Workers--A number of seasonal park maintenance
workers, balifield attendants and forestry aids have submitted resignations to the City in
order to return to school this fall.. It will be necessary to replace some of these workers.
The Parks and Recreation Department is currently interviewing applicants and will continue
to do so during the next few weeks. It is the recommendation of Superintendent of Parks
VonDeLinde that Melinda Kaltenhauser be hired as a seasonal park attendant and Layne
Anderson be hired as a seasonal forestry aid. Additional names will be forwarded to the
Council at subsequent City Council meetings.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the hiring of Melinda
Kaltenhauser as a seasonal park attendant and Layne Anderson as a seasonal forestry aid.
TREE CONTRACTOR LICENSES
B. Licenses, Tree Contractor, B & J Tree Care, Savage, MN--City ordinance requires
licensing of tree maintenance contractors for individual,partnership or corporations who cut,
trim, prune, remove, spray or treat trees. The City has received an application from B &
J Tree Care from Savage, MN. That license application, enclosed on pages )I through
-�Z, is in order for consideration at the August 18 City Council meeting.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve a tree contractor license for
B & J Tree Care of Savage, MN.
CO
City of Eagan Fee: $25.00 ✓
3830 Pilot Knob Road APPLICATION FOR LICENSE License year '92
Eagan, MN 55122-1897 TREE MAINTENANCE CONTRACTOR
For individual,partnership or corporation
who cut, trim, prune, remove spray or
heat trees.
I, 1.3 t S Ti-e G'4 Q-C hereby make application for a TREE MAINTENANCE
CONTRACTOR license for the the year 9'2 from the City of Eagan.
1-
OWNER uJck JOtfJJC ) ADDRESS 'j/07S t..' / 3 `/ 57 • PHONE #110 -. 3 r
(street)
A/4-G-Z tf itl.) 'SS37 V
(city) (state) (zip)
BUSINESS
NAME: 1 c)+" T ADDRESS: Ssfmz 4'3 ifri°`''Z PRONE #
(street)
(city) (state) (zip)
EMPLOYEES PERFORMING TREE MAINTENANCE:
Name: it.)0(0L--
(first) (middle) (last)
Name:
(first) (middle) (last)
Name:
(first) (middle) (last)
Name:
(first) (middle) (last)
(ATTACH ADDITIONAL NAMES)
VEHICLES USED FOR TREE MAINTENANCE:
t3 -t- ,j 7rut- �-- 7_� &t o LA1 700 /4<y
`�' (name) (year) (make) (model) (license number)
r rt.- C,-_ 8,5H FO AM i` -' S P. 0 i -G P L
(name) (year) (make) (model) (license number)
(name) (year) (make) (model) (license number)
(ATTACH ADDITIONAL VEHICLE INFORMATION)
EQUIPMENT USED FOR TREE MAINTENANCE:
(e.g.,stump grinder,brush dipper,chainsaws,sprayer,etc.)
4,36,{- % Al-/O i t- c_41-rPO,&Ao ISIt..4.A*r-F 4- c_C 's
(name) (function)
--S c.p(-Al- L04 D, .t- t4*•)c.1 IL-0' b"'"-L 3
(name) (function)
(ATTACH ADDITIONAL EQUIPMENT INFORMATION)
1 (
REFERENCES OF
PREVIOUS CLIENTS:
e)1 L 1. 0.0 y i W it
d z t) c X/fG/wL ? Y. 2-3 2-3
(name) (address) (phone #)
(name) (address) (phone #)
REQUIRED DOCUMENTATION:
1. /` Liability insurance in the following amounts:
* $100,000 for bodily injuries to one person
from one accident.
* $300,000 for injury of two or more persons
* $200,000 for damage or destruction of property
Insurance may not be canceled by insurer unless
there is 10 days written notice to the city.
If insurance is canceled, licensee must replace
with another policy which conforms to ordinance
requirements. The license is suspended until
insurance is replaced.
2. X Surety bond in the amount of$2500 naming City as
bondholder.
3. X Worker's compensation insurance certificate -when
such insurance is required by state statute.
4. by Agronomy Division of Minnesota
Department of Agriculture as a Commercial Pesticide
Applicator must be provided by the applicant or
employee administering chemical substances.
SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT:
1114
pct►-�z.0 S 5
(signet 1 (title) (date)
OFFICE USE:
Date Paid: 4 L, u_5 7 3 . /' /2._ Amount received: CO
Receipt #: C v v 19 City Council Approval:
(date)
•
D'-
Agenda Information Memo
August 18, 1992 City Council Meeting
ELECTION JUDGES/SEPTEMBER 15 PRIMARY ELECTION
C. Election Judges for September 15 Primary—Enclosed on page /1 is a list of election
judges who will serve at the September 15 primary election in the City of Eagan.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the list of election judges
for the September 15 primary election as presented.
� 3
UST OF JUDGES FOR APPROVAL
STATE PRIMARY ELECTION
SEPTEMBER 15,1992
DEMOCRAT REPUBLICAN
SHARON SCHOELLER MARIE OVERBY ANN OURADNIK RICHARD IFFERT
EVELYN COTA VIRGINIA ZEITZ BARB EDGERTON AURELIA PETERSON
VICKIE PLC)TT ELAINE JONES ROSE VIMR LYNN PRAZAK
SHARON BRUCE SARA TIDRICK TERRI BERKNESS CAROL RICHTER
PAT KAEDER JULIANN KELLER MILDRED HARTLEBEN MARY JANE LAROCK
HELEN KENNEDY ' JACK LATTEN AURELIA POPPLER ROSEMARY TEAFORD
WILLIAM GUELCHER STELLA LUNDQUIST ELEANOR KEEGAN KARON FACTOR
BARBARA SHIELDS HELEN OLSON BOB VOGEL ROBERT MILLER
LEO AMUNDSON ROBERTA SMITH TRACY JONES •JEANNE KOEHLER
MARY KELI.NER NANCY SEVERSON MARILYN LEGLER PHYLUS MANTHEY
IRENE WACHTLER VMAN DATE JUDY HAWLEY JEAN HARMON
RUTH TWOMEY ARHTUR PAULSON KAREN FLOOD
DONN KIRCHGATTER GLORIA PAULSON IRENE KREIDBERG
ORLEAN GARNESS KAY GRABNER JUNE KETCHAM
GARY DODGE CLARENCE HANSON CAROLVENIA RICHARDSON
SHARON ORTH FLORENCE HANSON KAY KOLEHMAINEN
ROBERT ZIMMERMAN EVELYN OTTERNESS MARK OLSON
ELIZABETH BASSETT ANN THOMAS NEAL BLACK
JIM KENNEDY MICHELLE DICK GROVER BELULE
JEREMY YARWOOD JIM DECH
ARLENE LEIBEL BONNIE TRANBY
JUDY SAIMA SHARON ASTLEFORD
MARIE LANE ETHOL GROFF
OLIVER MCCULLOCH SHIRLEY KLANG
STEPHEN OLSON SANDRA NELSON
KAY DODGE LYLE SEVERSON
JANET SCH UETZE JOAN BOHLIG
LINDA BUCHANAN SUE OLSON
TERRY MESTNIK MARILYN PORTER
ANNE SULLIVAN JEAN KIMBER
ELEANOR GRIMMER ELEANOR BRUCE
CAROLEE JONES PAULINE LEGENDRE
SHEILA SHAY NITA SWAN
ANGIE FLYNN KIM EDSON
BARBARA SCHREINER KAY URTZ
LORRAINE RIEGER LAURA BASBALLE
CAROL SUE CRUZ LUCY THOMPSON
JACK SWAN MARTI ANN GUETZLAFF
SUSAN KRETZMANN JANICE BELIEAU
LUCIA JOHNSON JOANN GEORGE
•
YVONNE KRISNIK KAREN UECKER
ALYCE BOLKE GLORIA CZYCALLA
DICK BEATTY NONA DAVIS
MAUREEN F'REBELICH TOM PEDERSON
JAN GIEFER MARGE JACOBS
BERNADINE GOESS JENNY BAKER
FRANK HAM ERNIK WILLIAM SKAR
JAMES KLASEUS DON HANSEN
JIM DRISCOLL PAUL YOUNGNER
DOROTHY PETERSON SHARON LINDHOLM
BEATRICE COOPER CAROL VIHOVDE
PAMELA HOCHHALTER SONYA LARSON
HELEN JAR\ NORMA WADE
MARILYN HOLM PHYLUS UGMAN
KAREN DARE CHERYL OSCARSON
JUDY MUNDAHL JANICE PARKER
•
CHARLOTTE O'DONNELL DIANN ENGLE
VICKIE JABBRA MARY HANSEN
CAROLYN THURSTON EVELYN USS
JUNE NELSON NANCY JAFM
MARIE DESLAURIER EMILY MEDIN
EDITH DRAKE CATHY BROST
KAREN RAINFORD BARB NUTTALL
JOAN COFFEY BARB LINERT
JUDY PETERSON ADEUNE BUEHLER
MARY TESKEE NANCY HAMMEL
LOIS AGRIMSON MICHELLE SKINDELIEN
IONA RAY ALICE KREITZ
FLORENCE MULLEN HELEN GERTEN
BEVERLY ZAINE PATTI BENJAMIN
CYNTHIA VOELKE
iii GLADYS BYRNES
Agenda Information Memo
August 18, 1992 City Council Meeting
SHOW LICENSE/HAUNTED HAYRIDE
D. License, Shows/Solicitor for Mitch Knoll - Haunted Hayride--An application for shows
license and an application for business solicitation license has been received from Mitchell
Knoll for Haunted Hayride which will take place October 1 through November 3, 1992. The
Police Department has reviewed this application and finds no reason to deny the
applications. Enclosed on pages /( through /9 is a copy of the application for shows
license, the application for business solicitation license,and a copy of the Police Department
report.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve a shows and solicitor license
for Mitchell Knoll for Haunted Hayride from October 1 through November 3, 1992.
•
$50:00 Investigation Fee ' CITY OF EAGAN Dated 4 oV 92
525.00 License Fee APPLICATION FOR SHOWS LICENSE
[Shows: public show, movie, caravan,
circus, carnival, exhibition, theater]
I, Mitchell Kholl , hereby make application fora Haunted Hayride
name type of show
license from the City of Eagan,which will take place on nr•t 1 f n Nncr A during the hours of
• dates
7pm to 12 pm at 900 Apollo Eagan,Mn. • The pie of the event
hours location
•
is Haunted Hayride (Outdoor family fun Halloween Theme) •
I represent Autumn, Inc. dba Haunted Hayrides TM
name of organization •
1460 Diffley Road Eagaii mn. 55122 687-0000
• address phone
•
Names and addresses of corporation officers: •
Mitchell W. Knoll 1460 Diffley rd 683-0896
name address
phone
Thomas M. Newhouse 1536 40th st. Mpls Mn. 722-5337
name address phone
name address
phone
name address phone
Person in charge of event: Knoll Mitchell William
last name first name middle name
1460 Diffley Rd. Eagan 687-0000 683-0896
address phone
8/30/57 477-72-2056
birthdate social security number
MAKE CHECK PAYABLE TO: CITY OF EAGAN. Licenses are issued for a specific period and will be issued
to qualified individuals or firms only. Failure to provide true and correct information shall constitute a violation
of the ordinance in question and in addition to penalties, the license of any applicant may be revoked.
•************************************************************ e m*******************************
FOR CITY USE ONLYz
•
7) . /jetz
Police Approval PP Date City Council Approval Date
491
l(4P
FEES: ,__S50 Investigation Fee (Non-Refundable)
x$25 License for up to three solicitors THE APPLICATION FORM MUST BE
S 5 For each additional solicitor PROPERLY COMPLETED OR IT WILL
NOT BE PROCESSED. —
LICENSE GOOD FOR UP TO ONE YEAR _
CITY OF EAGAN
_ . BUSINESS SOLICITATION LICENSE
(FOR PROFIT)
APPLICANTS NAME: Mitchell W. Knoll
(first) (middle) (last)
LOCAL ADDRESS: 1460 Diffley Road
(street)
r=gan,D4n 55122 16Q$
(aty&state) (HP)
HOME PHONE: 683-0896 BUSINESS PHONE: 687-0000 BIRHTDATE: 8/30/97
SOCIAL SECURITY NO.: 477-72-2056 DRIVER'S LIC.NO. K-540-603-887-675 G , Mn
(state)
APPLICANTS CURRENT AND PREVIOUS ADDRESSES FOR THREE YEARS PRECEDING THE DATE OF
APPLICATION:
STREET CITY/STATE/ZIP FROM ZQ
14Fn n; ffPy Roan Eagan,Mn. 55122 1957 PRESENT
APPLICANTS CURRENT AND PREVIOUS OCCUPATIONS FOR THREE YEARS PRECEDING THE DATE OF
APPLICATION:
OCCUPATION FROM TQ
Target - Store PIANNTNC; Mp1c ,Mn 19 85 • PRESENT
•
NAMES AND ADDRESSES OF APPLICANT'S EMPLOYERS,IF ANY,FOR THE THREE YEARS PRECEDING THE DATE
OF APPLICATION:
(1) _• _
FIRM NAME STREET FROM
SUPERVISOR CITY STATE ZIP PHONE TO
(2)
FIRM NAME STREET FROM
•
SUPERVISOR CITY .STATE ZIP PHONE TO
FOUR CHARACTER REFERENCES (IF APPLICANT HAS NOT RESIDED IN THE CITY FOR TWO YEARS
IMMEDIATELY PRECEDING DATE OF APPLICATION):
NAME STREET. CITY & STATE A/C TELEPHONE NO,
•
CITY OF EAGAN •••••••••s•e•e•O •ees••.•••
BUSINESS SOLICITATION LICENSE THE APPLICATION FORM MUST BE
(FOR PROFIT) PROPERLY COMPLETED OR IT WILL
NOT BE PROCESSED.
BUSINESS NAME: Autumn, Inc. dba Haunted HayridgSINESS PHONE: 687-0000
LOCATION OF SALES: 900 Apollo Drive, Eagandale industrial Park ,Eagan Mn.
(ADDRESS) (DOOR-TO-DOOR) •
NAME& DESCRIPTION OF PRODUCT: Haunted Hayrides ( family Fun)
•
VEHICLE USED FOR THIS BUSINESS: (IF MORE THAN ONE LIST SEPARATELY)
•
•
MAKE MODEL YEAR STATE LICENSE NUMBER ,
LENGTH OF TIME REQUIRED IN CITY: 30 Days
DATES OF ACTIVITY IN CITY FROM: Oct 1 , 1 9 9 2 TO: Nov. 2 1992
OTHER COMMUNITIES WHERE SAME PERMIT WAS ISSUED: Eagan
•
Have you ever been convicted of a felony,gross misdemeanor,or misdemeanor, Including violation of a municipal
ordinance but excluding traffic violations?
No X Yes If Yes,explain on the reverse side, the date and place of conviction and the nature of the offense.
•
ATTACH A COMPLETE LIST OF ALL SOLICITORS, INCLUDING EACH PERSON'S FULL NAME (FIRST,MIDDLE,L.AST)
ADDRESS (STREET,CITY,STATE,ZIP,PHONE NUMBER,AND DATE OF BIRTH)
ORDINANCE ALLOWS A FIVE-DAY (BUSINESS DAY) WAITING PERIOD BETWEEN THE APPLICATION
AND APPROVAL OF REGISTRATION DURING WHICH TIME THE POLICE SHALL MAKE AN
INVESTIGATION OF THE APPLICANT. THE REGISTRATION MAY BE EFFECTIVE WHEN THE
FOREGOING INVESTIGATION IS COMPLETED OR WITHIN FIVE BUSINESS DAYS OF APPLICATION,
WHICHEVER IS EARLIER. •
I SWEAR AND ATTEST TO THE FACT THAT THE PRECEDING INFORMATION IS TRUE
AND CORRECT,TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE. I ALSO GIVE MY PERMISSION TO
INVESTIGATE ANY OR ALL OF THE PERSONS LISTED,AS DEEMED NECESSARY BY THE
CITY.
-Y)-1 _,LI4 w , ilflAYV aac L
SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT. DATE
IctieJ 7- z-
POLICE PRO DATE OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK APPROVAL DATE
CITY OF EAGAN 3830 PILOT KNOB ROAD EAGAN 55122.1897 681-4600
�4
police department
� PATRICK J.GEAGAN
]p, Chief of Police
1'3
, KENNETH D.ASZMANN
city of eagan Operations Coptaln
3830 PILOT KNOB ROAD THOMAS EGAN
EAGAIJ,MINNESOTA 55122-1897 Mayor
PHONE:(612)681-4700
FAX:(612)681-4738 PATRICIA AWADA
PAMELA McCREA
TIM PAWLENTY
THEODORE WACHTER
Council Members
THOMAS HEDGES
City Admininstrator
EUGENE VAN OVERBEKE
City Clerk
August 7, 1992
TO: Jerry Meszaros, Operations Lt.
FROM: John Stevenson, Investigator
SUBJECT: PERMIT - HAUNTED HAYRIDE
I completed all routine file/computer checks and all were okay.
• On 8/6/92 I spoke to Mitch Knoll. He told me that the operation
will be exactly the same as last year. Ranger Security will again
provide security.
The first show will probably be on Friday, October 2nd, and will
run weekends until the 18th, then every night until the 2nd of
November.
Parking will be at Sportsman's. There is room for 300 cars (almost
double what they need. )
illseems •kay to issue a permit.
0
lrn Stevenson
• :kg
(l_r)
, itift , 7,
i
y
THE LONE OAK TREE . . .THE SYMBOL OF STRENGTH AND GROWTH IN OUR COMMUNITY
Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer -
__A?
Agenda Information Memo
August 18, 1992 City Council Meeting
COMPOST SITE LEASE EXTENSION
E. Request from Dakota County for Compost Site Lease Extension--Enclosed on pag@/
is correspondence from Lou Breimhurst of the Dakota County Physical Development
Department requesting an extension of the current County lease for the compost site south
of the municipal center through February 15, 1993. By previous action, the City Council
authorized the development of the replacement compost site west of Gopher Smelting and
Refining Company on Yankee Doodle Road. Unfortunately, business arrangements and
improvements of that site have not been finalized and it is anticipated that they cannot be
completed in time for the busy yardwaste season this fall. While staff is conducting
feasibility studies relative to improvements of the site for potential future expansion of the
Police Department and Administrative offices, it is not anticipated that any construction
work would begin prior to the date requested. The site will remain open on the reduced
schedule that is currently available, that being Fridays from 3:00-6:00 p.m., Saturdays from
9:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. and Sundays from 1:00-6:00 p.m.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve an extension of the joint
powers agreement/lease for Dakota County for operation of its yardwaste composting site
in Eagan through February 15, 1993.
08/12/92 15:41 DAKOTA COUNTY-WESTERN SERU. CTR. 001
DAKOTA COUNTY LOUIS J.BREIMMURST,P.E.
f mR1:ClUN
(612)891-7003
DIVISION OF PHYSICAL DEVELOPMENT I-ax(b12)B91-7031
p'S A Cot, 14955 GALAXIE AVENUE APPLE VALLEY,MINNESOTA 55124-8579
c r
DCMIiTMENT$OF•
.
• MICIIWAV;,
• PARKS
rL
• f'LANNiNt3 6 enOOg••MBMT.
• mESOUROE REOOVEAY
fj1.1•N ;cpS\ •BURVEY Ir ►
Post-It brand fax transmittal memo 7671 'Norm*.
19d P"s - MCluoiI
August 7, 1992
Dept. Phone�1?!- 7i T
• Sax N Far#
Thomas L Hedges, Administrator - -
City of Eagan
Municipal Building
3830 Pilot Knob Road
Eagan, MN 55122
Dear Mr. Hedges:
As we discussed, the yard waste compost site proposed by Richard
Pecar and Gopher Smelting and Refining Co. in Eagan has not
developed as quickly as anticipated. The principals are in
agreement on the conditions of the lease, however, completing
arrangements for site improvements is requiring more time than
expected.
All possibilities to develop the site are being pursued by both
parties. However, the new site will not be operational when the -
existing site is scheduled to be vacated on August 31.
Dakota County is requesting that the lease for the existing site
be extended until February 15, 1993 . This date would allow allow
residents to have continued access to a compost site for their
yard waste and Christmas trees following the 1992 Holiday Season,
and provide more time to resolve the site improvements issue and
complete the necessary arrangements at the Gopher site.
Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely,
Louis J. Breimhurst, P.E.
PHYSICAL DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR
cc: Dakota County Board of Commissioners
Brandt Richardson, Dakota County Administrator
Richard Pecar, R.D. Pecar & Co. , Inc.
John Tapper, Gopher Smelting and Refining Co.
•
kei
Ww e2?/ AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER
Agenda Information Memo
August 18, 1992 City Council Meeting
ORDER PUBLIC HEARING/DELINQUENT UTILITY BILLS
F. Receive Assessment Roll/Order Public Heari Delinquent Bills--A list of delinquent
bill accounts is enclosed on pages3througk ff for your review. City policy for these
accounts is to assess them against the subject property for payment with property taxes. The
assessments will be spread for one year only at 81% interest.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To receive the assessment roll and order
the public hearing for assessment of delinquent utility bills for September 1, 1992.
CLOSED ACCOUNTS
101670132001 104022042 . , 21.91
101670132001 104022043 30.40
101670325001 104071041 23.02
108460008005 105008095 50.44
108427527002 108313031 9.27
108427515002 108325091 14.47
108427513002 108327071 10.20
108460205003 111045026 15.76
104727505001 116207051 6.47
101500305001 119009092 13.96
101500802002 119159072 8.06
101500806001 119168063 26.95
101500905001 119179031 13.15
101500907001 119181091 13.15
101500912001 119186041 10.20
101500913001 119187031 9.27
106585020002 120033071 5.88
108195012002 120100051 191.84
108195012002 120100052 44.93
108195011004 120163091 6.47
108195006206 120176041 9.27
106275004103 120278012 35.31
101715033002 121004001 62.69
101715008102 121027036 221.73
105380104102 121349043 111.52
106580009002 122016043 6.13
105615007002 122113061 5.88
105615005002 122117021 9.42
102085007001 122707082 34.76
103980003002 123064032 48.11
103980202008 123121045 34.12
103980202008 123121046 51.31
105210111002 124235051 23.94
104507012003 124279022 110.04
104507306001 124381073 24.82
107595119002 125091051 42.29
101660204001 126083034 31.64
101660205202 126106064 74.56
101740020200 126163064 29.59
101740102001 126194093 6.00
101740006201 126227004 11.71
101740211002 126289053 90.10
101740211204 126298043 123.87
101740306201 126327252 143.48
106398304005 128108004 59.68
106398303008 128122023 98.02
102275012002 129031002 22.60
101230007001 131018031 6.63
C;13
101230003002 131021081 10.31
101230002003 131029001 18.52
101230006003 131032052 5.75
101230009004 131044011 6.03
101230001005 131053091 6.03
101670508002 236111061 8.00
101670508002 236111062 7.80
101670607002 238081081 88.76
103295103006 239182043 144.84
107710004007 240091025 66.11
107710003005 240104073 53.87
107300001018 242046046 12.24
107650002010 243010045 21.16
103300007007 247092061 61.61
106590523002 248323051 66.05
101499214001 250048053 14.16
101499227001 250061075 209.82
102390004003 253065072 43.50
104490102003 361062011 61.15
101630028001 361177033 25.35
101807540001 361438083 30.73
106399509001 362306051 7.16
105880004001 362318011 7.16
101550008001 367020091 6.20
101550008002 367056061 6.63
•
103299008004 368068001 6.63
103299017004 368077091 6.20
108447708002 369125091 6.03
108447719002 369136061 5.88
101499722002 371190052 53.75
101499612009 376081061 5.88
107587505002 380061021 5.88
107587505002 380061022 26.92
107587806001 380120011 22.71
3,183.84
OPEN ACCOUNTS
SEWER AND WATER
108460008005 105008090 44.34
108435403001 109002070 187.19
108435404101 109003060 85.21
108435406005 109058000 153.87
108435401004 109065010 184.71
108435410005 109072020 50.28
108435410005 109072100 95.33
108460201004 110110040 56.16
108460204005 110115090 189.89
,24
101710003103 113027000 30.13
101710402102 113085170 217.36
108435507005 114057010 91.69
108435507005 114057190 382.25
101775009002 116027030 59.41
104805003204 117153150 284.04
107297507201 117176000 59.19
105380104102 121349040 80.42
105380105002 121351090 95.91
103980201008 123120050 66.06
104507109002 124319040 489.47
107595010003 125058060 275.47
101660109001 126024050 67.12
101660203001 126082040 65.63
101660212102 126092020 46.82
101660201102 126114060 167.18
101740014800 126120080 104.53
101740015400 126132040 146.29
101740016100 126142020 42.30
101740018000 126173040 59.62
101740016500 126178090 61.11
101740202103 126271050 194.71
106920010000 126441000 245.58
106398102010 128005040 45.09
106398103009 128018090 86.89
106398301008 128124000 315.01
106398304012 128138040 255.65
106398402003 128207000 254.30
101375004004 128404010 57.21
102275007001 129048010 43.35
101230014004 131049060 103.32
101670011002 231006050 44.07
101670016007 231097050 75.25
101670220006 232135070 78.22
108470007001 233085130 45.06
108470004001 233085390 43.67
108470004001 233085470 65.45
108470003001 233085540 39.71
•
108470002001 233085620 57.04
100190001111 234023160 316.77
101330003001 234084040 191.25
101330003001 234084120 91.09
104730003001 234086020 51.49
104730003001 234086100 26.51
101170007001 235020080 66.34
101671208101 237132090 42.68
101671102001 237138030 244.28
101671102001 237139020 224.47
101671101001 237140090 461.69
101671101001 237141080 205.36
101670627005 239043030 173.94
107710005020 240022060 46.64
107710003018 240030060 71.89
107710005013 240073040 40.70
107710003003 240108030 39.71
107710001008 240124030 39.71
107710003009 240134010 39.71
107300203009 242016000 63.47
107300001016 242050070 378.46
107300004006 242074090 39.71
107300104009 242118070 97.63
107300302007 242138030 36.51
107650104004 243047010 123.37
107650202009 243093040 39.71
107650304001 243141060 111.49
108446010003 243326030 54.67
108446011003 243329000 63.58
101499204001 250040030 247.01
101499234001 250068000 165.94
101499323001 250075010 101.44
101630027001 361176040 66.62
101630028001 361177030 69.09
104810005000 362181050 143.97
104465142001 364316090 39.71
104465138001 364320030 25.38
104775011002 365057090 251.50
104507604002 378069080 272.34
101122508002 381156060 69.52
10,823.91
STREET LIGHTS
108427524002 108316000 14.47
108427516002 108324000 14.47
108427509002 108331010 14.47
108427505002 108335070 14.47
107120003001 116225600 8.26
101500921001 119195030 14.47
106585013001 120019050 14.47
106585014001 120020020 14.47
106585006002 120046020 14.47
108195003003 120062010 6.63
108195009003 120068050 6.63
108195016001 120073080 6.63
108195015001 120074070 6.63
108195013001 120076050 6.63
108195012001 120077040 6.63
108195009005 120128030 14.47
108195009005 120129020 14.47
108195008005 120130090 14.47
108195008005 120131080 14.47
108195003005 120140070 14.47
108195003005 120141060 14.47
108195012003 120144030 6.63
108195025002 120166060 6.63
108195005006 120177030 6.63
108195005006 120178020 6.63
107585203003 120218040 14.47
107585202003 120219030 14.47
107585201003 120220000 14.47
107585201001 120221090 14.47
101230003003 131028010 6.63
106399506001 362309020 15.30
106399504001 362311080 15.30
105880005001 362319000 15.30
105880007001 362321060 15.30
105880008001 362322050 15.30
105880009001 362323040 15.30
105880010001 362324030 15.30
105880012001 362326010 15.30
105880016001 362330050 15.30
105880017001 362331040 15.30
105880002002 362334010 15.30
105880002003 362338070 15.30
105880003003 362339060 15.30
105540006001 363065610 16.21
101550005005 367006070 6.63
101550004001 367024050 6.63
101550007004 367046090 6.63
101550009002 367057050 6.63
108447609001 369062040 10.36
108447702001 369116000 10.36
108447613002 369193060 10.36
101827526003 375062010 6.63
620.99
STORM DRAINAGE
100240002060 155010000 32.51
100250001103 155011090 18.48
100340002076 155048060 32.51
100260001053 155065040 32.51
100260001051 155067020 12.41 •
100360001128 155077000 12.41
100360001051 155082030 32.51
100360001281 155090030 25.16
D.1
103985001001 155093000 32.51
105360001002 155115040 32.51
100390002004 155127000 . _ 32.51
100360001082 155139060 17.19
102090001004 155141020 268.68
100360002006 155149040 70.81
100250001052 155159010 14.23
100360006027 155163050 32.51
100260002053 155181030 12.41
100170001053 255003070 15.02
100190001151 255005050 27.21
100200006275 255006040 18.52
100210001228 255011070 14.47
100220001185 255020060 27.21
100220001286 255022040 27.21
106870101000 255023030 14.47
100020003078 355009090 31.93
100020002078 355010060 31.93
100100006030 355014020 31.93
100020005025 355031010 31.93
100380008002 355049010 31.93
100380003002 355050070 17.86
104870001200 355066090 18.48
1,051.96
Agenda Information Memo
August 18, 1992 City Council Meeting
WETLAND REPLACEMENT PROPOSAL/ALSCOR INVESTORS JOINT VENTURE #2
G. Consideration of Wetland Replacement Proposal for Alscor Investors Joint Venture#2
in Eagandale Industrial Park #4--Enclosed on pages cat through 32 is a copy of a
memo from the City's Water Resources Coordinator concerning a wetland replacement
proposal as submitted by Alscor Investors Joint Venture #2. Alscor Investors is proposing
filling in of.23 acres of wetland and replacing that wetland with new wetland on other areas
of their property. Usually, this type of proposal is considered in the platting process.
However, platting is not necessary for this construction activity. Therefore, it is being
considered separately. Staff is recommending approval of the wetland replacement
proposal.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the wetland replacement
proposal for Alscor Investors Joint Venture #2 in Industrial Park #4 as presented.
02C/
•
MEMO TO: TOM HEDGES, CITY ADMINISTRATOR
FROM: RICH BRASCH, WATER RESOURCES COORDINATOR
DATE: AUGUST 7, 1992
SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF WETLAND REPLACEMENT PROPOSAL
FOR ALSCOR INVESTORS JOINT VENTURE #2 IN
EAGANDALE INDUSTRIAL PARK #4
•
Introduction
OPUS Development Corporation is proposing to commence construction activities on an
8.42 acre industrial parcel owned by Alscor Investors and located in Eagandale Center
Industrial Park #4 in the SE 1/4 of Section 11. The site contains .23 acres of wetland that
will be impacted by the development.
.As you know, the City of Eagan is the local government unit responsible for administering
the provisions of the state Wetlands Conservation Act of 1991. As such the City Council
must decide whether to approve any wetland replacement plans associated with draining or
filling of wetlands as required under the WCA. In most cases, wetlands impacts associated
with developments are handled through the platting process. Any wetland replacement
recommendations are incorporated into the development contract language and approved
by the Council when the Council approves the development contract as a whole. Since the
Alscor development is not being platted, approval of the wetland replacement proposal is
being handled as a separate issue for Council consideration.
•
Wetland Issues and Replacement Proposal
OPUS Corporation proposes to fill approximately .23 acres of wetland within an 8.42 acre
industrial site in Eagandale Industrial Park #4. The wetland is small, isolated from other
water courses and lakes, of relatively low value, and is located just to the east of the site
center where construction of a building and parking lot is proposed. For these reasons, staff
is recommending that the City consider allowing filling and replacement as an alternative
for mitigation as required under the Wetland Conservation Act.
Attachment 1 identifies the location of the existing wetland as well as the location for the
proposed replacement wetlands. Of the 10,150 square feet of wetland that would be filled,
6,725 square feet will be replaced by the creation of a small wetland in the northwest corner
of the site near the intersection of Aldrin Drive and the railroad tracks. The remaining
3,425 square feet would be replaced by expanding an existing type 6 wetland that lies on
land immediately north of Aldrin Drive which is also owned by Alscor Investors. The
wetland replacement must be supervised by a qualified wetland contractor.
30
TOM HEDGES
PAGE 2.
AUGUST 7, 1992
Requested Council Action
Staff is requesting that the Council approve the wetland mitigation plan outlined above.
Rich Brasch
Water Resources Coordinator
RB/nab
Attachment
cc: Ken Vraa, Director of Parks and Recreation
Mark Anderson, OPUS Development Corp.
5b:hedges.219
`3 1
A
I
I I I 1
i2■ I
u(\
I o
I :':r I a
I -:
^y
1 ALORIN DR. —
l' ,
I .....jriT) : k..........ir _. ,
/
1 . , I / v D "r
1.i.-..5 n r----7'—--- , :-__._. \ .T
ri i
VIII
a L ' i
O , -
I..i +I-I I \ ` I I - -YQSI _ ' \ > f�Y1J —) / I •-
z 1 I I I ,■ '1 I I N ( r
o_
c. i Ij 1 1 I I e�:e I
_ I I �a "'■>yaa. II' ll�l� a
1.7.M IS, II _ _ t cDl
x;>" (I It k / I
Z f _ \ / I
n I I � \ \ `"�aa �(
.T II( /a•
2
I I pan t., / Leo
8014/ I
I i•1 r�u ` 1
II I
Tm ' IIli1 I II I I Ii\1 4, i I .
m o -/ i 111111111 I
r -i 11 I I I \
Z a ' � I I li�11111_ ,'' \\ \\ 1
I1 II 111 ' i ' _
I 411 ,/ ( ` - .
- - I o y I
Agenda Information Memo
August 18, 1992 City Council Meeting
RECEIVE BIDS/AWARD CONTRACT/PUMPER TRUCK
H. Receive Bids/Aw d Contract for Construction of Pumper Truck, Fire Department--
Enclosed on pagec.35is a copy of a memo from Fire Chief Southorn regarding bids for a
new pumper truck. The bids were opened on Friday, July 31, 1992 by Deputy Clerk Witt
and Fire Chief Southorn. Only two bidders, Custom Fire Apparatus and General Safety
Equipment, responded to the request for bids. As explained by Fire Chief Southorn, the
Fire Department is currently reviewing these bids. Additional information will be available
prior to or at the August 18, 1992 meeting.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the recommendation of the
Fire Department for the bid for the construction of a new pumper truck.
�3 3
MEMORANDUM
TO: Tom Hedges, City Administrator
FROM: Ken Southorn, Fire Chief 74275-
SUBJECT: Pumper Truck Bids
DATE: 8/11/92
On Friday, July 31, 1992 bids for a new pumper truck were
received and opened by Deputy Clerk Liz Witt and Fire Chief Ken
Southorn. Only two bidders, Custom Fire Apparatus and General
Safety Equipment, responded to the request for bids.
The Fire Department truck selection committee has reviewed
the specifications as bid from each vendor and is conducting "on
site" inspections of similar equipment currently in use by other
Fire Departments in the area. Product quality is of the utmost
concern. Because these trucks are expected to have an active
service life in excess of 20 years, the truck committee is
concentrating their efforts on critically reviewing the quality
and functionality of these vehicles. In addition, each of the
manufacturing facilities is being inspected to review production
practices.
At the time of this memo, the truck committee has not
completed it's evaluation of the two vendors and their products.
We expect to have this analysis complete and to provide a
recommendation to the council at the regular meeting of August
18, 1992 .
Action Required: Accept or reject bids for the construction of
a new pumper truck as recommended by the truck committee.
Agenda Information Memo
August 18, 1992 City Council Meeting
FINAL PLAT/LAKEVIEW TRAIL ADDITION
I. Final Plat, Lakeview Trail Addition--Staff has received an application for final plat
approval of Lakeview Trail Addition. All conditions placed on the preliminary plat approval
of May 20, 1992, have been totally complied with. All final plat application materials have
been submitted, reviewed by staff and found to be in order for favorable Council action.
A copy of the plat as it appears for filing at Dakota County is enclosed on page.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the final plat for Lakeview
Trail Addition and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute all related documents.
•
V'/`C '� e.. % LZ.-.t`t� L- t2 Li
!p`o
. c� •„`•' .k �t`°°° ` .tip`1 'a, I 1 1 •
/• v
i- . Q . , ,.. i . ,. _,,,
I:q - -1" . a / i.14 C f , i t c) � .4 M W `, r � E a i�5q
, .rr.r. ...,-..,,.:7 1
I
•
II I
N i
11..""Y.
4 i'
A - ilil f
:c-
-• ,! 4N,
.� . jt. e Jill ig
. Ne..♦,,tt . .`• 1 ". trs't2 w t of
+� �l'aty'�•r,', '.�. yp Xs:1 r,ffra.s..saran.f�
til :iii:
-:i), aI ..L.w,fwir'i -fJ F44,1,":715,1 j
•-`; •^ . aJ .t_, g
s �,-; is ,1 a 1 1.. 1,1.,171 Ills . .iii I .
} ell 1
..,,,s, I i 1 i
ftllt to E
/
3 G
Agenda Information Memo
August 18, 1992, City Council Meeting
RECEIVE FEASIBILITY REPORT/ORDER PUBLIC HEARING
J. Project 639,Receive Feasibility Report/Order Public Hearing(Aldrin Drive- Streets
& Utilities)--On July 7, the City Council received a petition from the Opus Corporation
requesting the installation of streets and utilities within Aldrin Drive from Mike Collins
Drive westerly to the railroad tracks and authorize the preparation of a feasibility report.
This feasibility report has been prepared and a preliminary copy is being provided to the
Council without page number for their consideration of scheduling a public hearing to
formally present and discuss these proposed improvements.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To receive the feasibility report for
Project 639 (Aldrin Drive - Streets & Utilities) and schedule a public hearing to be held on
September 17, 1992.
APPROVE AGREEMENT WITH SOO LINE RAILROAD
(WESTON HILLS - UTILITY CROSSINGS),
K. Project 632, Approve Agreement With Soo Line Railroad (Weston Hills - Utility
Crossings)--In order to provide trunk utility service to the Weston Hills development under
Project 632, it is necessary to obtain a permit from the Soo Line Railroad for crossing their
right-of-way. There are a total of five crossings at four separate locations. The railroad has
provided two options to the City.
Option No. 1 provides for a "Pipeline Crossing Permit" for a one-time fee of $5,400.
However, this permit is subject to termination upon 30 days written notice which would
require the City to remove all utilities installed under this permit.
Option No. 2 is a permanent easement for each crossing dedicated to the City of Eagan for
a one-time fee of $10,500.
In discussing this issue with various officials with the railroad, they do not know of a
situation where a pipeline crossing permit was terminated and a municipality required to
remove their facilities. However,there is a potential that,for whatever economic incentives,
the railroad could terminate the permit and consider issuing a new one at a much higher
rate. Again, their history does not indicate this ever occurring.
Therefore, these two options are being presented to the City Council for their consideration
of determining the proper cost/risk ratio.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve either 1) Pipeline Crossing •
Permit #28758 with Soo Line Railroad in the amount of $5,400; or, 2) approve easement
acquisition in the amount of$10,500 and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute all
related documents.
31
Agenda Information Memo
August 18, 1992, City Council Meeting
VACATE UTILITY & DRAINAGE ESMT
(DEERWOOD SCHOOL ADDITION)
L. Vacate Utility & Drainage Easement, Receive Petition/Order Public Hearing
(Deerwood School Addition) -- With the building of the Middle School adjacent to
Deerwood Elementary, it would encroach on the existing westerly lot line of the Deerwood
School Addition. When this was first platted, there was a 5' drainage and utility easement
dedicated along this future common lot line which should be vacated. The City has received
a petition to vacate this easement from the School District and is presenting it to the
Council for their consideration of scheduling a public hearing to formally present and
discuss any concerns.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To receive the petition to vacate a
drainage and utility easement within the Deerwood School Addition and schedule a public
hearing to be held on September 17, 1992.
VACATE UTILITY & DRAINAGE ESMT
(COVENTRY PASS ADDITION)
M. Vacate Utility&Drainage Easement,Receive Petition/Order Public Hearing(Outlot
A, Coventry Pass Addition)--Staff has received a petition from the developer of the
proposed Coventry Pass 4th Addition requesting the vacation of drainage and utility
easements dedicated with the platting of the.1st Addition. All required easements will be
replaced with those dedicated as a part of the 4th Addition.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To receive the petition to vacate
drainage and utility easements within Outlot A, Coventry Pass Addition, and schedule a
public hearing to be held September 17, 1992.
RECEIVE PETITION/AUTHORIZE FEASIBILITY REPORT
(ST THOMAS BECKET ADDITION)
N. Project 640, Receive Petition/Authorize Feasibility Report (St. Thomas Becket -
Utilities)--Staff has received a petition from the church requesting the City to prepare a
feasibility report for the installation of utilities necessary to service this proposed facility.
The petition agrees to reimburse the City for all costs incurred if for some reason the
project is not approved by Council action.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To receive the petition and authorize
the preparation of a feasibility report for Project 640 (St. Thomas Becket Addition -
Utilities).
39
Agenda Information Memo
August 18, 1992, City Council Meeting
VACATION/LOT 8. BLOCK 2,WOODLANDS N ADDITIION
O. Vacate Utility & Drainage Easement, Receive Petition/Order Public Hearing (Lot
8,Block 2,Woodlands N.Addition)--We have received a petition from the developer of the
Great Oaks Addition (Robert Engstrom) requesting the City to vacate the common lot line
drainage and utility easement previously dedicated over Lot 8, Block 2, Woodlands North
Addition, which is being replatted into the Great Oaks Addition. With all application
submittals being reviewed and found to be in order, it would be appropriate for the Council
to set a public hearing to formally discuss this request.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To receive the petition to vacate a
drainage and utility easement over Lot 8, Block 2, Woodlands North Addition, and schedule
a public hearing to be held on September 17, 1992.
Agenda Information Memo
August 18, 1992, City Council Meeting
FINAL PLAT EXTENSION/THE WOODLANDS NORTH SECOND ADDITION
P. Final Plat Extension, The Woodlands North Second Addition—The final plat for The
Woodlands North Second Addition was approved at the April 21, 1992,regular City Council
meeting. Because the plat was not recorded with Dakota County within the requisite 60
days, it fis necessary for the Council to approve an extension of the final plat. Enclosed on
page `t ( is a copy of a letter from Bob Engstrom requesting that an extension to August
25, 1992, be approved to allow for recording with Dakota County. There have been no
changes to the plat and all final plat requirements have beep met. A copy of the plat as it
appears for filing at Dakota County is enclosed on page Z
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve a final plat extension to
August 25, 1992, for The Woodlands North Second Addition and authorize the Mayor and
City Clerk to execute all related documents.
•
kC)
.RUG 14 '92 09:45 ROE RT ENGSTROM CO'S• • P.2
•
--'� ROBERT ENGSTItiDM CMPANIES
• •
• •
• • • •
August 14,1992 •
•
•
Mayor and Counal•Memlrs • -
City of Eagan •
3830 Pilot Knob Road
Eagan,MN 55121 •
•
Dear Mr.Mayor and Council Members: • •
•
We hereby request an extension for recording the approved plat of The
Woodlands North Second Addition to August 25,1992. •
•
. Kind regards,
•
•
•
•
•
. Robert E..Engstrom • •
REE/al • •
1 .
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
... LAND SPECIALISTS ...
• • 4801 West 81st Street • Suite 101 • Minneapolis, Minnesota 55437 • (612) 893-1001
R■95% 14/ 612 893 1841 08-14-92 09:42AM P002 #05
•
I •
41
41
6
CV
V I h
11 3/ il
i 1
I I 1 x •Ibi 16
41
I
41
.• I XII 11 A
1 I
_ ___] x a ......,
v.9 i --0..foro— II a Ibal 11
1°11V
V S . i I P i.g 1 bi1
m '-- i X
I
I F I
06---..4 -.--
I fi g P
I . • ••
11 • 1-8
2 9 b 11X
a
ZI 3 11.13.00 N
CD / r 1 .14 3
11e44 N .,. •
I
r—
o 1 "--, •cr•
-IT •
I • •
• •
• •
• • i ,^-Itt, . :•.''s
/ /1 ...•it ,.„...
.. .. • ,
,
-.. I I
rz
I
- 111 i/I '
I /I
, / -
'1 lir.4
/ /-•., \
/ 5' •.
/ / , %
/ / •. % •/ •
2 i
/ / i . ‘
I-N
Pt3 / / .'• '■
l-.1 I
CI •:.I I 0
I I '1 . / ..I• ‘4 4
.'•' • c•
\
44 Z I I / i
II fi k , / '..; i :=-. ‘ '1 ._:,
* •,' \ "1
. ,.. , I x , ,
, , -, , : ,
,,.:,
, s
< 0
C...) •-, L I 1 s) 1 I /,'i;
, I wi, /
• • ..-- St .
, , ... .
St'.:... .:.... .
r.T.1 '''' 4•-.J
S. -..,
00 si.-/ L....__7. , 4
• . 4.151.„....! ,/
s.. ...--' • b•- \% •
Elm. Cl) :::' t 1 J 3.93.C•03 N
(.
• 1,,,
..".... ..-
-4■;.,„./...' /''
- 1 \
g -
7 g ) •• ,..:, __--
-.-
I')
.1 •I . ; " :::
....
.-,
---
b 41
'8,1 611-----Q
- -----
_.1-4‘, !--gi— —
• z
I IX
I.::
v, ...
—
.-, ......,
0 IVA r--*--
.-a 11 -0--- • 1-.
1 ; ---4.----,
's, '..
Z :::
"
• • • c
....._
4,'",, "-
to ;`,
(1
L1.1
cc) ti
1....1
ii:
SI 3.5031L.00 li
.4154,f, — — - , ---- I o •.,
. :(1/ ...."*....'113,<---SAM LI / •
....1 nom v tert A zun I.SV3 . # De A11.0115•
— )--- --- — tk
— ...
A ig "... 11 v,,, 4„,4 .. e.... , , • .......,. ..,.-., -,
, 8 s.
-, ., -: / gip
\ ■
wig II 11 !0‘ \ ‘ ‘ ...... -... . / t z
t 1
t
t % \\
t 1
t, %I t t \
A,
..". k I;
- .. ., . •
f:21 V
v ■•• 1
■.. .., , „.
■ . . ■
,•\ •,:•., OD \ \ ,,',
- ,
",'
0 .4 5
3 ..
0 ti % ot .■ ..-
\ I...... \ \
..../ ' „4 .,•
0 \ ..."4 \\\,..,'
1 I I
I t
• ■ .>•
, \ \ .!:. . • .4t •••:.
It ....., •Cr •
I ■ % 1
\ I ‘..--•
3
r.74 SO . A° I. _--
%.*".... MO -.
M lc '' 1•11 16.3‘.32.
US
E""4 at 3,11,•1.00 N W
.5"
-■ rm • --7,..," I • 1
......:' 1 ...
V.
* •••
i ......i _
‘
...■', ...... ",..
.-
1..i N.
..-
'.. q
: 2
•4
t it!
Nro -I
...0r.
01 II V
tt V
N. .....
.... .-
13
L 1 J
5 - .
.
Agenda Information Memo
August 18, 1992, City Council Meeting
APPROVE FINAL PYMT/ACCEPTANCE
(BLACKHAWK COVE - SANITARY LIFT STATION),
Q. Contract 92-02,Approve Final Payment/Acceptance(Blackhawk Cove-Sanitary Lift
Station)--The City has received a request for final payment and acceptance of the above-
referenced public improvement by the contractor along with a certification by the City's
consulting engineer(OSM)that the construction conformed to the City's plans,specifications
and standards. Final inspections have been performed by representatives of the Public
Works Department and found to be in order for favorable Council action.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the final payment for
Contract 92-02 (Blackhawk Cove - Sanitary Lift Station) in the amount of $51,959.40 and
accept the improvements for perpetual maintenance subject to appropriate warranty
provisions.
•
Agenda Information Memo
August 18, 1992, City Council Meeting
TUBLIC HEARINGS
POPPLER ADDITION
A. Project 636,Poppler Addition (Streets&Storm Sewer)--On July 21,the Council received
the feasibility report for the above-referenced roject and scheduled a public hearing to be
held on August 18. Enclosed on pages T S through('o Q is a copy of that feasibility
report. All notices have been published m the legal newspaper and sent to all affected
property owners informing them of this public hearing. Representatives of the consulting
engineering firm who prepared the report and City staff will be available to address any
questions that may arise from this public hearing process.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To close the public hearing and
approve/deny Project 636, Poppler Addition (Streets & Storm Sewer) and, if approved,
authorize the preparation of detailed plans and specifications.
•
LO-
re s�f
`sr�E,syM�,��BC�` •�r�
hgc y`b`�,,`'CreFar6�E°��s
°srperF s. 2 .xy y M1•yr
city of QaQan
Report for
Poppler Homesteads No. 2
Storm Sewer and
Street Improvements
City Project No. 636
•
Eagan, Minnesota
July 1992
File No. 49527
9onestroo
Rosen.
•
MAnderiik &
Associates
EnpNwt,•Architects
St.rata Minnesota
jiji Otto G.Ramsbo4 PE. Howad A Salford.PE. Gary F.Rylaider,PE. Phip 1 Cave(PE.
Bonestroo R,txn W.Rosere,PE• Keith A Gordon.PE. Ismael Martina.PE. Mark D.Wail PE.
Joseph C.ArhderRt P.E. Robert R.Plelkrle.P.E. Michael P.Rau,P.E. Mies B.Jensen,P.E.
Marvin L Sonata.PE. Richard W.Foster,PE. /lyres M.Ring.AICP. L Phillip Gravel M.PE.
Rosene Richard E.Turner,PE. David Q Loskata.PE. Thomas W.Peterson.PE. Kahen L Wkvrcnc PE.
' Anderlik & Thomas E Noyes PE. Jerry A Bourdon,P1. James R.Matad.PE. Keith R Yaps PE.
■ Robert G.Sctisi t.PE. Mark A Hanson.PE. Jerry D.Plertac h,PE. Sharon D.Gustafson PE.
Associates Susan M.Eberin.CPA Michael 1.Ra tman,PE. Kenneth P.Anderson,PE. Cecile Olivier,PE.
*Senior Cans uart Ted K.Feld PE. Mark R.RA.PE. Charles A Erickson
Engineers & Architects Thomas R.Anderson.AJA Mark A Sets PE. Leo M.Pawelsky
g Donald C.&agar*.PE. Gay W.Morten.PE. Harlan M.Olson
Thomas E.Angka.PE. Daniel 1 Edgerton,PE. Janes F.Engelhardt
July 13, 1992
City of Eagan
3830 Pilot Knob Road
Eagan, MN 55122
Re: Poppler Homesteads No. 2
Storm Sewer and Street Improvements
Project No. 636
Our File No. 49527
Dear Mayor and Council:
Attached is our report for the Poppler Addition Storm Sewer and Street Improvements. The
proposed storm sewer and street improvements are presented and discussed within the report
along with detailed cost estimates and a preliminary assessment roll.
We will be pleased to meet with the Council and other interested parties at' a mutually
convenient time to discuss the report.
Yours very truly,
BO TR.•0 ' OSENE, ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES, INC.
a /II Gc 1 c
Ma A. Hanson
•
MAH:li
I hereby certify that this report was prepared by me
or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly
Registered Professional Engineer under the laws of
the State of Minn sota..
ccilizet. .
Mark A. Hanson
,, -) •
i •' / . e: July 13, 1992 Reg. No. 14260
Reviewed by: ' ' w%C�`��
De+artment of Pu•lic '`orks
Reviewed by: ` V LA/Alt,—
Fina Department
•Date: Z 9 49527.Rpt
2335 West Highway 36 • St.Paul,Minnesota z 636.4
- 612- 600
POPPLER HOMESTEADS NO. 2
STORM SEWER AND STREET IMPROVEMENTS
EAGAN, MINNESOTA
PROJECT NO. 636
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page No.
LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL 1.
TABLE OF CONTENTS 2.
SCOPE 3.
FIGURE NO. 1 - LOCATION PLAN 4.
FEASIBILITY AND RECOMMENDATION 5.
DISCUSSION 5.
A. STORM SEWER 5.
B. STREETS 6.
C. SERVICES 7.
D. STREET LIGHTS 7.
EASEMENTS AND PERMITS 7.
COST ESTIMATE 7.
AREA TO BE INCLUDED 8.
ASSESSMENTS 8.
REVENUE SOURCES 9.
PROJECT SCHEDULE 9.
APPENDIX A - PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATES
APPENDIX B - PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL
FIGURE NO. 2 - STORM SEWER AND STREET LAYOUT
FIGURE NO. 3 - STREET SECTION
FIGURE NO. 4 - EXISTING SANITARY SEWER AND WATER MAIN
LV-1
REPORT FOR
POPPLER HOMESTEADS NO. 2
STORM SEWER AND STREET IMPROVEMENT
EAGAN, MINNESOTA
PROJECT NO. 636
SCOPE
Poppler Homesteads No. 2 is a residential subdivision located south of Lone Oak Road
midway between I-35E and Pilot Knob Road as shown on Figure No. 1. The residential
subdivision presently consists of 6 single family lots and one outlot. Homes exist on Lots 1, 3,
6 and Outlot A.
The work proposed herein provides for the construction of storm sewer and street within
Poppler Lane. The project is proposed at this time due to the anticipated subdivision of Outlot
A into 3 lots located along the west side of Poppler Lane.
49527.rpt LL 3 3
Ll
t�1�t11
17 � I tli1l1l1Ii1i ��ff...mum ■t allifirevf ♦ Nr 1 ifilfr
1---- • [ alt.i... t` fl ��
'1------tom gaz�r��sf■ ��►a � �1�� ,`
Llis1A#. :N :-..jai �\ I
. .4 AN lailille loin u al-- •„,,,,v4 4
s rs.
anurolling IiD
i'R .I1 ..
j I illW
Ai#r##lE/l#iau tie*. • ►,�t� sf /t%��
�"' ate.;`. I Project Location
' w MI.;
W. Poppler Addition II
Imo 44 yea: � ��� ��,, � ����1��>A•;
�I 1� I `, � MITII
N
1
i i;i,„2000
Scale In lont
Poppler Homesteads No. 2
Location Plan / Bonestroo
Rosene
AndsIie'lk Storm Sewer & Street Improvements FIGURE 1 Assocs
Project No. 636 Engineers &Architects
Eagan, Minnesota 111.Paul•MIIwsulw
49527F01.DWG JULY 1992 COMM. 4 27
FEASIBILITY AND RECOMMENDATION
The project is feasible from an engineering standpoint and is in accordance with the
objectives established in Eagan's Comprehensive Utility and Street Plans. The project can best
be carried out as one project.
DISCUSSION
A) Storm Sewer
Storm sewer proposed herein includes the construction of a 15" diameter storm sewer
to collect runoff in the low point of Poppler Lane discharging to Pond DP-15 (Poppler Pond).
The storm sewer location is shown on Figure No. 2.
Pond DP-15 is ultimately intended to discharge directly to Pond DP-2 (Lemay's Lake).
Pond DP-15 presently does not have an acceptable storm sewer outlet typically constructed in
Eagan to Lemay's Lake. However, Pond DP-15 has not experienced flooding in the past and
an outlet to Lemay's Lake would cause a degradation of the existing water quality of Lemay's
Lake. Therefore, it's expected either an old drain tile exists between Pond DP-15 and Lemay's
Lake or the water level is maintained by groundwater flowing through the soil southwesterly
to Lemay's Lake. The best location for a storm sewer outlet from Pond DP-15 to Lemay's
Lake is across the property located west of Outlot A. Because this property is not proposed
to be developed at this time, it's recommended the water levels in Pond DP-15 be monitored.
If the water level begins to rise in Pond DP-15 and impact adjacent property or the adjacent
property to the west develops further, consideration will be given to constructing the storm
sewer outlet at that time.
49527.rpt
SO V
B) Street
Street proposed herein provides for constructing a 24' wide bituminous street with
surmountable concrete curb in the same location as existing Poppler Lane. Present City
Standards would require a 28 foot wide (face of curb to face of curb) street surface for Poppler
Lane. However, because of a previous Council directive, the proposed street width is 24 feet.
Poppler Lane is presently a 20'wide curbless bituminous street constructed in 1970. The
street was constructed following the utility construction. It's suspected the existing subgrade
and gravel base is of good quality based on the condition of the existing street surface.
Therefore,from an economic standpoint,it would be desirable to utilize the existing gravel base
and bituminous surface. However, in some areas the existing profile of the boulevard and
street will not allow the proposed street to be easily constructed at an acceptable engineering
grade. Therefore,this report assumes that the existing bituminous surface is to be removed and
a portion of the existing gravel base is to be saved and reused. The possibility of salvaging
some of the existing bituminous will be evaluated when final design is completed. Salvaging
of the existing bituminous could result in a reduction in construction costs of$2,000 to $3,000.
The proposed street sections are presented on Figure No. 3. The new street will follow
the existing street alignment to minimize tree removal. It's presently felt the new street can be
constructed in the existing right-of-way. If not, additional right-of-way may be required
dependent on the property owners desires to save existing trees. Also included, as part of the
street project,is the adjustment of manholes and gate valves. Boulevard sod and topsoil borrow
is proposed behind all new curb construction. Driveway repair will also be required for the 3
existing bituminous driveways.
49527.rpt 6
C) Services
Presently 4 homes abut and utilize Poppler Lane. Ultimately 9 homes will abut Poppler
Lane after Outlot A is subdivided and the remaining lots are developed. The
existing sanitary sewer and water main was constructed in Poppler Lane in 1970. Utility as-
builts and television inspection logs indicate that only sewer wyes and risers presently exist to
the undeveloped lots. Therefore, as part of the street project,utility services(sewer and water)
to the undeveloped lots will be constructed and extended to 10 feet beyond the property line
and be assessed directly to the lot they serve.
D) Street Lights
Two street lights presently exist to serve Poppler Lane. It's not felt any additional street
lights will be required.
EASEMENTS AND PERMITS
A 60' wide public street right-of-way will be dedicated with the final plat of Poppler
Homestead No. 2 for Poppler Lane. Therefore, no additional street right-of-way will be
required. A pond easement exists over Pond DP-15 from the westerly adjacent property. The
extension of storm sewer to Pond DP-15 from Poppler Lane will require additional utility
easement dedication. All ponding and utility easement requirements will be provided with the
final plat at no cost to the project.
49527.rpt �� 7
COST ESTIMATE
A detailed cost estimate for Project 636 is presented in Appendix A. The total estimated
cost is $71,080 which includes $59,260 for streets and $11,820 for services. This cost
includes 10% for contingencies and 30% for indirect costs which include administrative,
engineering, interest, and legal expenses.
COST SUMMARY POPPLER HOMESTEADS NO. 2
Street Construction $59,260
Services 11.820
TOTAL $71,080
AREA TO BE INCLUDED
Poppler Homestead
Lot 1-6
Outlot A (Poppler Homestead No. 2)
ASSESSMENTS
Assessments are proposed to be levied against the benefited properties. It's proposed
to assess the street and storm sewer costs for this project based on existing and future lot
equivalents. Lots 1-6 are proposed to be assessed one lot equivalent each. Outlot A is
proposed to be assessed 3 lot equivalents based on the preliminary Poppler Homesteads No.
2 plat. The estimated cost per lot equivalent for street/storm sewer and service is listed below:
Cost/Lot Equivalent
A) STREET/STORM SEWER $6,585
B) SERVICE $2,364
All assessments will be revised based on final project costs. A preliminary Assessment
Roll is presented in Appendix B.
49527.rpt S 8
REVENUE SOURCES
All project costs estimated for this project are proposed to be assessed. Therefore, no
costs will be required from the City's Major Street Fund.
PROJECT SCHEDULE
Present Feasibility Report July 21, 1992
Public Hearing August 18, 1992
Approve Plans and Specifications September 1, 1992
Open Bids/Award Contract September 15, 1992
Substantial Completion November 6, 1992
Assessment Hearing August, 1993
. First Payment Due with Real Estate Taxes May, 1994
The above schedule assumes the project is approved at the August 18, 1992 Council
Meeting. If the project is continued, construction may have to be delayed until 1993. The City
may want to consider bidding two completion dates (November 6, 1992 and June 30, 1993) to
determine if there is an advantage to delaying the construction until 1993.
49527.rpt 9
t(
APPENDIX A
POPPLER HOMESTEAD NO. 2
STREET AND STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENTS
PROJECT NO. 636
I) STREET (Remove Existing Bituminous Surface)
Unit
Unit Quantity Price Total
Clear and grub tree Each 1 $ 250.00 $ 250.00
Bituminous Removal S.Y. 1,850 1.80 3,330.00
Common Excavation C.Y. 600 5.00 3,000.00
Class 5 Aggregate Base Ton 500 8.00 4,000.00
Bituminous Base Ton 250 13.00 3,250.00
Bituminous Wear Ton 250 14.00 3,500.00
Bituminous Mtl. for Mixture Ton 30 130.00 3,900.00
• Surmountable Concrete Curb L.F. 1,700 5.00 8,500.00
Bituminous Driveway Repair S.Y. 60 5.00 300.00
Std. C.B. w/cstg. EA. 2 1,000.00 2,000.00
15" RCP Storm sewer L.F. 60 26.00 1,560.00
15" RCP Apron EA. 1 1,050.00 1,050.00
Topsoil borrow C.Y. 300 10.00 3,000.00
Seed w/mulch & fertilizer AC. 1.0 800.00 800.00
Sod w/existing topsoil S.Y. 1,500 2.00 3.000.00
Total $41,440.00
+10% Contingencies 4.140.00
$45,580.00
+30% Indirect Cost 13.680.00
TOTAL $59,260.00
49527.rpt 10
II) SERVICES
1 inch corporation stop Each 5 $ 70.00 $ 350.00
1 inch curb stop and curb box Each 5 100.00 500.00
1 inch type K copper service pipe L.F. 220 12.00 2,640.00
4 inch PVC SDR26 sewer pipe L.F. 220 15.00 3,300.00
Connect to existing sewer service Each 5 250.00 1,250.00
Mechanical trench compaction L.F. 220 1.00 220.00
Total $8,260.00
+ 10% Contingencies 830.00
$9,090.00
+ 30% Indirect Cost 2.730.00
TOTAL $11,820.00
49527.rpt 11
APPENDIX B
PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL
POPPLER HOMESTEAD NO. 2
STREET AND STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENTS
PROJECT NO. 636
Parcel
No. of Lot Stree t Services Total
Description Equivalents Cost/Lot Cost/Lot Cost/Lot
POPPLER HOMESTEADS
Lot 1 1 $ 6,585 $ --- $ 6,585
Lot 2 1 6,585 2,364 8,949
Lot 3 1 6,585 --- 6,585
Lot 4 1 6,585 2,364 8,949
Lot 5 1 6,585 2,364 8,949
Lot 6 1 6,585 --- 6,585
Outlot A 3* 2** 19.750 4,728 24.478,
'TOTAL 9 $59,260 $11,820 $71,080
* Three (3) lot equivalents for street
** Two (2) lot equivalents for service
49527.rpt si 12
/ <
Co. Rd. 26 (Lone Oak Rood)
< 1 411110
1 . 1
%10
0-
• ,"
010-27 : .; 2 Proposed
'
, 24' Street
..
, 4110
'.•':
POND ,; ,p..:1-.1;...1::''
. •......,
1 DP-15 • -, 7 _ • •,.,..
: •t•t•N:••• •-
/3 • • 4::I:..../
..,L r.".••:.::::::...4...!ie
.1 e.•;• .1:t.'..••••1"
15* ,2; :,...t. •
IA
CS) .)■• 4 41110
< 4 0
7 ISO ;
-;,
1
0
5
" 4110
LEMAY LAKE 1
POND
DP-2
0 Number— Lot Equivalents
6 Existing Street Light
•••■%.,
1
ligli
1 1 2 0 i
I I
/
I 1
1
010-31 032-31 ----.\ 033-31
0 100 200
liaMil
Seals In test
Poppler Homesteads No. 2
Storm Sewer & Street Layout iii Bonestroo
Rosene
Storm Sewer & Street Improvements FIGURE 2 0 m Anderlik et Associates
Project No. 636
Eagan, Minnesota Engineer* a Architects
. Milwaukee
et Paul 0
49527F02.DWG JULY 1992 5ri COMM. 49527 .
60'
Variable Variable
. is 12' 12'
Surmountable
Curb
1 1/2" Bit. Wear
1 1/2" Bit. Base
Save Existing Gravel Base
TYPICAL STREET SECTIONS
Remove Existing Bituminous Surface
R R
60'
Variable Variable
r 12' 12'
Surmountable
Curb
6" Gravel Base
2" Thick Bit. Patch
1 1/2" Thick Bit. Wear
— Existing Bituminous (20' Wide)
Existing Gravel Base
STREET SECTION WHERE POSSIBLE
Save Existing Bituminous Surface
Poppler Homesteads No. 2
Street Section Bonestroo
Rosene
Anderlik &
Storm Sewer & Street Improvements FIGURE 3 Associates
Project No. 636 Engineers d Architects
Eagan, Minnesota St.Paul•Milwaukee
49527F03.DWG JULY 1992 COMM. 49527
Co. Rd. 26 (Lone Oak Road)
I
• • . • • . . •■•.ImEm ....ow •e■■•••■•• mom..•
I amm w■•mmis ammw•maw mom•,1■•emme•own Omm.•=Imo•■•••■■•■••••■••emu.•••■■■•■■••■•••■■■•••■•■•
..4.....a‘u 1.r..... ......= AI-
• % <
■ C%-%
CI 1
%.0
`It g ig 1 o
..'
co-
010-27
..
.t A • "\c.-10: .it,;:i2'..
• .,.:,
: .•,•••
i DP
fl .93
AB. .6 LL...410
1 11
• —• ,
•.4:,:•,:.:•!-:
,
... . . .......
•,...4 I. •
1 te- ------ i
1-1-c-T)
Ex. PVC-- , , Ex. 6" CIP
.0, 1
• San. Sewer 41 0 Water Main
LEMAY LAKE
N.%% IbN -r 4 MO Number— Lot Equivalents
6
1 1
POND
DP-2
For Sewer/Water Service
--.14
1 2 0
1
N
010-31 032-31 033-31
1 0 loo 200
liiiESI •
Sane In Ise
Poppler Homesteads No. 2
Sanitary Sewer & Water Main Layout (Exist.) II Bonestroo
• Rosen.
di
Anderlik
Storm Sewer & Street Improvements FIGURE 4 il Associates
Project No. 636
Eagan, Minnesota Engineer. &Architects
Ilt.Paul•Milwaukee
49527F02.DWG JULY 1992 (a9OMM. 49527
Agenda Information Memo
August 18, 1992 City Council Meeting
BUSINESS OLD
..... ...................
VARIANCES/RICHARD SKNN
A. Variance, Richard Skinn, of 20' to the Rea/yard Setback Requirement and a Variance
of 50' to the Required 100' Setback from Property Zoned Agricultural; a Variance of 7' to
the Required 20' Sideyard Setback; and a Variance to the Curb and Gutter and Paving
Requirements for Lot 1, Block 2, Halley's 1st Addition, Located in the Southeast Quarter
of Section 36--An application has been received for the above-referenced variances from
Richard Skinn for his property located in the Halley's 1st Addition. This item was
previously before the City Council on August 4, 1992 and was continued at that time to
permit the Council an opportunity to walk the site and review issues with respect to the
long-term development of the property. For additional information with respect to this item,
please refer to the Co unity Development Department staff repo which is enclosed on
pages ,)--through 7 p for your review. Also enclosed on page &to is a supplemental
memorandum outlining the variance history of the properties located in this subjilivision
other than that owned by Mr. Skinn. Finally, enclosed on pages 61 throughtp is a
copy of the draft minutes of the August 4, 1992 meeting for background purposes.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny: 1) a variance of
20' to the rearyard setback requirement, 2) a variance of 50' to the required 100' setback
from property zoned agricultural, 3) a variance of 7' to the required 20' sideyard setback,
and 4) a variance to the curb and gutter and paving requirements for Richard Skinn for Lot
1,Block 2,Halley's 1st Addition,located in the southeast quarter of Section 36 as presented.
((
SUBJECT: VARIANCE (REVISED)
APPLICANT: RICHARD SIINN
LOCATION: LOT 1, BLOCK 2, HALLEY'S FIRST ADDITION
(SE QUARTER SECTION 36)
EXISTING ZONING: LIGHT INDUSTRIAL (LI)
DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: AUGUST 4, 1992
DATE OF REPORT: JULY 30, 1992 •
COMPILED BY: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
APPLICATION SUMMARY: An application has been submitted requesting a 12' Variance
from the south property line and a Variance of 10'to the required 20'side yard setback, and
a Variance to parking lot standard requirements of curb, gutter, and paving for Lot 1, Block
2, Halley's 1st addition located at the intersection of Biscayne Avenue and Gun Club Road.
BACKGROUND: The 123' x 246' site is zoned Light Industrial, however the City's
Comprehensive Guide Plan calls for D-I Single Family (0-3 units/acre) development in this
area. The south and east property lines abut property zoned Agricultural. Biscayne Avenue
and Gun Club Road are gravel-surfaced City streets.
COMMENTS: The applicant is proposing a 60' x 104' (6,240 sq. ft.) pole-type building to
be used for storing snowplowing equipment and a six-stall off-street parking area. The City
Code requires a minimum building setback of 100' for any industrial property abutting
agricultural, residential, or public facility zoned property. Mr.. Skinn is seeking a 12'
Variance from the south property line, a 10' Variance to the 20' minimum setback from the
north property line, and a Variance or exemption from the required parking lot standards
including concrete curb and gutter and paving. The applicant is proposing a gravel surface
without curb and gutter for the parking and drive aisle areas.
If approved, this Variance shall be subject to the following conditions:
1. The drive aisle and parking areas shall meet all minimum setbacks.
2. A landscape plan shall be submitted for review and approval.
3. No outside storage shall be allowed.
4. All applicable City Code requirements.
•
' 9'�4� •..� r,(1.1.1.1444 r
541.7//
i � ). thllip l�t
a Lflf � �
1 I _` 131 r- t/ I1{. ''T NW : -k!-:),IA
'
�.i i.:. tit .o
C 'I
LOCATION Ct ► t� _ ~' •
4 Al-
t ( '1.r . ,
• I frn1,• . /-
1•
'AL
l I / ,.
f" L•rs (/huH
SW 'Ri,eO
//
/..
•
•
(1—Vir-1-*'•.„ / ./ J
•
- : � , Ri
R2 —
ZONING -,-,:kr . 1
r
I •
..- .x. j i .a -"
.-.ice es =2, r. ROTZKE
i•. 9.F �!: %.' I •0['- _ -
::` v, ! 4i3w _
JJtE
GUIDE PLAN :., •
• •
•
lk.
■. .
•
. .
•
• _.___
,..-...--..--.. —x--..:7;•...wioe- ---- 7----- /
FARM ROAD
02
.4 ,
• ■ .
/ 010-82
v
..i. ,. ..„.v. , .
..t. „/ / •
/ /
/ / i
..- •
. ,
.
/ . / A4
• . /
-
•6:, SP tt7
.t •I."
....7* •
•
C.., r. r: ! •
- r, • .
c) /
Ft , ?•14:5 1 I S:07,4j.'
/
t
.
...
/ • . ,
.. z i
i . .:( • .
021-79 - 2 or• -7
.. 1 t2
C:\ 3
. :.;
. .
) / 10.Z i
:.! .
f ill
4
0
U)
. FO 7. I■X :. .
• E -
i 44
Li
. • .. ....... .•.• .•.. .. .
,:•••••••••••: .....::•:.............:.........:...::••••••••••••::........: .
1! ■ .
. ■••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• .
a" • •• ••••••• •••••.•••••••••••
• • ••.• ••..• • •••• .•.••••..
..112t, '. •••••••••••••••&:•tk:••••••ar•:..■
./. GUN ., Lut--.-- :1 •
„.• ,t •, 7 : on
1- !SII e: •151 •
es'
....■••Ge."44....." ..--------7,.\\ A6
. •
C.<4
Certificate of Survey Luz :
. •
;VIC:1MA
SURVEYING RICK SKIN*
SERVICES INC. .
112 �iw a .. treli`slr 19.11 Seneca Roil • S,.:te E.•
Evan,ANnMeo16 661 V
Phew*:(612)462.9077
No a AAAress: 54 144reni
Ph, q52-3Y0 h.
%i- 14(4 w.
N
— — — —d— So°oZ'n"u 1Z3.00 _b
' 9v-Ora:na3e. 4 ui:t-ty rase..4-41 .,
33
bi.S T T �r 1 .
10 ( I j e• I��4 , S ibil ' 81 9$.,
i I
I \‘‘.N a H, •
+ Ir,
4A : Vd...pri 4 f g. . E-I
�y/ I�i•.'3 Deer •y :•., .,-_ eel — a •
1. to I „�^k.>,X 81X_ jil)
l.:i t . I ��
N Q
2 a '-.c ,k.: t�4 6,4Y<.‹,_ a t n
5 f If I i*•=d;i f.,‘,.,t, ..K.g g i. - ,— .
, 11 :s..x.c.'-:',5 v,.x.§ al -.9: a n I , to /< rte.. k\ 3 I ..... At
11 7-j-- vI '4..0 .;5`ri,`'tX1 ! o .0 I * <
y ,
t •••••,,1%,'
•60.0: /.,":4, CO'Oo
1 (X 100.0) 1 Se+67r1a n
n
\\\ 1 3' 1z Ji c15
s�k " (54"\''' k° f U 0 W •
I
CO 10 /bfi 164.—.... � ;3 hi
-- - ± I f Ti 11A � " IZ
- a6.9r =..-.NO°Ot'ii',,.Ex ,� Z3.00 ` — M
--7.7---01x---------_______107A-
1n M
tr'rt Ex1s}:.,y Gravel Road M _ _�xP�w �`j.
BISCAYNE AVE . �e
1 �►% Scale: 1"=No'
t ;�../ p oe..ies Iro.� Mor.usne.�t Fe�+,c(
��.,/ 01.6 Oe�s4es Exisl'AI Spe4 Elev.'s
("c94.S Denotes Pusees.a Spb{ Elev.'s, I
-PROPERTY DESCRIPTION-
. -SURVEYORS CERTIFICATION-
I hereby certify that this survey, plan or
Lot 1, Block 2, HALLEY'S 1ST ADDITION, 'direct supervisiondand thatrIuamea duly
according to the recorded plat thereof, Registered land Surveyor under the laws of
. Dakota County, Minnesota. the State of Minnesota. �/
\lift.. &10164--6— e644-. Date: -4
Wayne D. Cordes, Minn. Reg. No. 14675
/^ /\ ' ,Reefed : Ju-7 Zt, I . Proposed Pa.k:«g ) 13d .
I ^ J and axi 1,3 E�V's,
MEMORANDUM
TO: DALE RUNKLE, DIRECTOR OF CO TTY DEVELOPMENT
FROM: MIKE RIDLEY, PROJECT P
•
DATE: AUGUST 12, 1992
RE: HALLEY'S 1ST ADDITION
Following is a summary of past City Council action and existing conditions of Halley's 1st
Addition lots located on either side of Biscayne Avenue north of Gun Club Road in the SE
quarter of Section 36.
o Lot 1. Block 1 - 5/1/84. 15' Variance to drive aisle setback and Variance to curb,
gutter and paving requirements. Building setback 65' from south property line.
o Lot 2. Block 1 - Setbacks are met. No curb, gutter, or paving.
o Lot 1 Block 1 - No building, curb, gutter, or paving.
° Lot 4. Block 1 - Setbacks are met; no curb and gutter, some paving.
o Lot 5. Block 1, - No building, curb, gutter, or paving.
• Lot 2. Block 2 - Setbacks are met; no curb, gutter, or paving.
o Lot 3. Block 2- 5/3/88. Setback Variance from AG zoning denied; Variance to curb,
gutter, and paving requirements approved.
o Lot 4. Block 2 - Setbacks are met; no curb, gutter, or paving.
o Lot 5. Block 2 - No buildings, curb, gutter, or paving.
Please advise if you require further information.
Project Planner
MR/js
Attach.
T
•
pallIEWNESS:1
VARIANCES/RICHARD 81CINN/HALLEY'8 1ST ADDITION
Mayor Egan introduced this item as a variance for Richard
Skinn, of 20' to the rear yard setback requirement and a variance
of 50' to the required 100' setback from property zoned
agricultural; a variance of 7' to the required 20' side yard
setback; and a variance to the curb and gutter and paving
requirements for Lot 1, Block 2, Halley's 1st Addition, located in
the SE 1/4 of Section 36. Director of Community Development Runkle
explained the application and its location. Mr. Runkle noted that
the property is "Comp Guided" as single-family, however, is
presently zoned LI (Light Industrial) .
Richard Skinn, the applicant, said his business is expanding
thus necessitating a larger building. He said he has done some
landscaping to screen the building but added that he would not need
the variances if he could avoid putting in a drain field. When
asked whether he had talked to his neighbors about his plans, Mr.
Skinn said his only neighbor is Earl Moratske and Mr. Moratske had
no objections. Mr. Moratzke was present and indicated his
agreement. Mayor Egan told Mr. Skinn that he understood Mr.
Skinn's request for setback variances, but asked why he wished a
variance from the curb, gutter and paving requirements. Mr. Skinn
said the remainder of the area is gravel and said he would be happy
to pave the parking lot and put in curb and gutter when the rest of
his neighbors did.
City Administrator Hedges indicated that staff had discussed
the conflict between the Comprehensive Guide Plan and the zoning of
_ the property and it was their opinion that either the area should
be an industrial park or a "holding" zoning; however, if it was to
be an industrial park, it should have paving, curb and gutter
installed.
Councilmember McCrea asked Mr. Skinn how long he'd owned the
property and he indicated 4 months. She asked if he had purchased
the property with a contingency on being able to build this
building on the property and he said he had not.
•
After further discussion, Mayor Egan said he could find no
hardship to justify these variances. Councilmember Pawlenty said
he would presume that when Mr. Skinn bought the property he
realized what the setbacks were and asked what had changed in the
•
past 120 days. Mr. Skinn said the property was advertised as a
one-acre lot but now realizes it is smaller than he anticipated.
Councilmember Pawlenty summarized the issues but indicated the
real question is what the City wants the property to become.
Councilmember McCrea said that as it stands today, the applicant
could build a pole barn on the property without a variance. She
suggested that rather than. deny the application, a continuance be
LAR
granted so that Council could walk the property.
Pawlenty moved, McCrea seconded, a motion to continue to the
August 18, 1992, regular City Council meeting a variance for
Richard Skinn, of 20' to the rear yard setback requirement and a
variance of 50' to the required 100' setback from property zoned
agricultural; a variance of 7' to the required 20' side yard
setback; and a variance to the curb and gutter and paving
requirements for Lot 1, Block 2, Halley's 1st Addition, located in
the SE 1/4 of Section 36. Aye: 5 Nay: 0
SPECIAL USE PERMIT/STEININGER CONSTRUCTION
Mayor Egan introduced this item as a special use permit for
Steininger Construction, to allow continued concrete recycling in
a Light Industrial (LI) zoning district on a portion of Parcel 10-
01300-012-26, located in the NW 1/4 of Section 13. Director of
Community Development Runkle said that a special use permit had
been granted to the applicant subject to annual review. He said no
negative comments had been received from the surrounding
properties.
Councilmember Wachter asked several questions about the
removal of gravel from the property. The applicant said they were
removing gravel from the Gopher Smelting property and Steve Bryant
of West Publishing said they were removing gravel from their
property as well. Mr. Bryant went on to say that the applicant was
doing a fine job and West Publishing had no objections to the
renewal of their application.
Pawlenty moved, Wachter seconded, a motion to approve a
special use permit for Steininger Construction to allow continued
concrete recycling in a light industrial zoning district on a
portion of parcel 10-01300-012-26 and subject to the following
conditions:
1. Dust control procedures shall be utilized.
2. Hours of operation shall be limited to 7:00 a.m. - 7:00
p.m. , Monday through Saturday.
3. The operation shall be subject to an annual review. If
renewal is denied, the applicant will be provided with a six-month
notice for termination.
Aye: 5 Nay: 0
GRADING/EXCAVATION PERMIT/WEST PUBLISHING
Mayor Egan introduced this item as a Grading/Excavation Permit
for West Publishing, for approximately 12 acres on Lot 1, West
Publishing 2nd Addition, and Lot 1, Block 1, Lembke 1st Addition,
located along the north side of Wescott Road in the SE 1/4 of
Section 13. City Administrator Hedges said the application had
Agenda Information Memo
August 18, 1992, City Council Meeting
CONSIDER AWARD OF CONTRACT (GREAT OAKS ADDN & WOODLANDS N 2ND)
B. Contract 92-09, Consider Award of Contract (Great Oaks Addition & Woodlands
North 2nd Addition)--On August 4,the bids were received for the above-referenced contract
but consideration of contract award was continued until August 18 due to the fact that the
final plat for the Great Oaks Addition was not in order for approval prior to contract award.
Also, although the Woodlands North 2nd Addition was formally approved by Council action
on April 21. However, due to the fact that that final plat was not recorded within the
required 60 days, the Council's approval of that final plat has expired.
Therefore, before this contract can be awarded, these two developments must receive final
plat approval to ensure that public rights-of-way and easements will be provided as
necessary to allow the installation of these public utilities. Also, the developer has
petitioned for a vacation of a drainage and utility easement over Lot 8, Block 2, Woodlands
North Addition which is being incorporated into this plat. The developer has indicated the
County's requirement that this vacation take place in order for the plat to be recorded. The
public hearing for this vacation is scheduled for September 17. There is a question as to
whether the final plat for the Great Oaks Addition should be approved prior to the public
hearing for the vacation of the drainage and utility easements.
• Therefore, the status of these final plats will have to be resolved prior to proceeding with
this contract award. Staff will provide an update at the Council meeting prior to this action
being taken.
Enclosed on page 70 is a tabulation of the bids received on July 31 for this contract.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To continue consideration or award
Contract 92-09 (Great Oaks Addition & Woodlands North 2nd Addition - Streets &
Utilities).
•
U
GREAT OARS ADDITION
PROJECT 633
WOODLANDS NORTH 2ND ADDITION
PROJECT 630
UTILITY AND STREET IMPROVEMENTS
CONTRACT 92-09
EAGAN, MN. 1992
BID DATE: FRIDAY, JULY 31, 1992
BID TIME: 10:30 A.M.
CONTRACTORS PROJ. 633 PROJ. 630 TOTAL BASE BID
1. CECA UTILITIES $ 294,665.75 $ 28,575.07 $ 323,240.82
2. NODLAND CONST. 301,651.50 25,984.65 327,636.15
3. NORTHDALE CONST. 317,949.25 38,025.10 355,974.35
4. BROWN & CRIS 328,077.10 33,174.62 361,252.72
5. BARBAROSSA & SONS 357,549.00 33,621.65 391,170.65
6. G.L. CONT. 430,450.60 40,363.12 470,813.72
LOW BID $ 323,240.82
Feasibility Report Estimate $374,748.00 $ 26,732.00 $ 401,480.00
S Over (+) Under (-) -21.4% +6.9% -19.49%
Engineer's Estimate 357,000.00 36,454.50 393,454.50
% Over (+) Under (-) -17.5% -21.6% -17.85%
kl
Agenda Information Memo
August 18, 1992, City Council Meeting
CONSIDER AWARD OF CO ' CT (WESTON HILLS)
C. Contract 92-10, Consider Award of Contract (Weston Hills - Trunk Utilities)--On
August 4, the bids were received for the installation of trunk utilities to service the Weston
Hills Addition under the above-referenced contract. Enclosed on page -7 2-is a tabulation
of those bids as corrected based on staffs review of the accuracy of the extension and
tabulation of the unit prices for the low bidder.
This contract award was continued until August 18 to allow additional time to obtain the
necessary permits from the County, State and railroad which have now been resolved.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To receive the bids and award Contract
92-10 (Weston Hills - Trunk Utilities) to S.J. Louis Construction Company in the amount
of $269,194 and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute all related documents.
•
WESTON HILLS ADDITION
PROJECT 632
CONTRACT 92-10
TRUNK UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS
EAGAN, MN. 1992
BID DATE: JULY 31, 1992
BID TIME: 10:30 A.M.
CONTRACTORS TOTAL BASE BID
1. B.J. LOUIS CONST. $ 269,194.00 $
2. BARBAROSSA & SONS 282,956.00
3. EJM PIPE SERVICE 317,034.25
LOW BID $ 269,194.00 $
Feasibility Report Estimate $ 234,790.00 $ 2&3 68-.0G
% Over (+) Under (-) F.R. +14.65% +46:14%
Engineer's Estimate $ 282,223.00
% Over (+) Under (-) E.E. - 4.62% -5.22%
11
Agenda Information Memo
August 18, 1992 City Council Meeting
3 I` .SS
CDBG/ENTITLEMENT RECERTIFICATION
A. Recertifica ion for Entitlement,Community Development Block Grant Funds--Enclosed
on pages - through 7 is a memorandum from Community Development Director
Runkle covering a copy of a resolution necessary for recertification for entitlement for the
community development block grant funds. As the Council is aware, the Cities of Eagan,
Apple Valley and Burnsville are entitlement cities under the block grant program. The
purpose of a resolution is to ensure that the communities are in compliance with
requirements of recent legislation regarding police policies, Fair Housing Act, Americans
with Disabilities Act and other applicable laws.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny a resolution which
will permit recertification for entitlement for community development block grant funds for
the City of Eagan through the Dakota County Housing Redevelopment Authority.
•
•
•
•
13
MEMORANDUM
TO: TOM HEDGES, CITY ADMINISTRATOR
FROM: DALE RUNKLE, DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
DATE: AUGUST 12, 1992
RE: RECERTIFICATION FOR ENTITLEMENT
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT FUNDS
The City is working with the Dakota County HRA in fulfilling their requirements for
certification for the Community Development Block Grant Program. There are policies
prohibiting excessive force by law enforcement agencies. The community development
department has dispersed this resolution to the Eagan police department for their review.
It is my understanding that their present policies would fulfill this requirement in prohibiting
excessive force. The Dakota County HRA is anticipating its completion of the recertification
by September 1, therefore this resolution must be adopted on the August 18, 1992 City
Council agenda for ratification.
If you need additional information, please advise.
Director of Community Development
DCR/js
•
AUG— 3- 92 MON 15 : 05 HOUSING & REDEV AUTH P . 04
SUPPLEMENT ft To TEE EXISTING
000plZATTroN ACIRMIZIAT tom MIX aIISOTA COUNTY
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SLOGS GRANT PROGRAM
IRIS AGREEMENT made and entered into by and between the COUNTY OF DAKOTA,
State of Minnesota, hereinafter referred to as "COUNTY" and the city of
Eagan hereinafter referred to as COOPERATING COMMlUNITY,• said parties to
this Agreement each being governmental units of the State of Minn
and is made pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 471.59. esota,
The parties further agree that the COOPERATING COMI=TY has adopted and
is enforcing:
I. A policy prohibiting the use of excessive force by law enforcement
agencies within its jurisdiction against any individuals engaged in
non-violent civil rights demonstrations; and
2. A policy of enforcing applicable State and local laws against
physically barring entrance to or exit from a facility or location
which is the subject of such nonviolent civil rights demonstrations
within jurisdictions. .
The parties further agree to take all actions necessary to assure
compliance with the COUNTY's certification required by Section 104(b) of
Title I of the Mousing and Community Development Act of 1974, as amended,Fair Housing Act, The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, and
other applicable laws. They aloe agree that the COUNTY shall not fund
activities in or in support of a unit of general local government that
does not affirmatively further fair housing within its own jurisdictions
or that impedes the COUNTY's actions to comply with its fair housing
certification.
The parties have caused this Agreement to be duly executed.
APPROvED AS To FORM AND EXECUTION: COUNTY OF DAKOTA, STATE OF
MINNESOTA
Assistant County Attorne By:
Y Y Chairman of its County Board .
Date: Date:,
City/Township of
(Strike One)
Sy:,
•
Its Mayor/Hoard Chair
Date:
•
R-96% X124233422 08-03-92 03:06PM Pi"04 `'25I
Agenda Information Memo
August 18, 1992 City Council Meeting
RECOMMENDATION/DAKOTA COUNTY HRA/
FEDERAL RESERVE BANK/PROPERTY ACQUISITION
B. Recommendation, Dakota County HRA, Federal Reserve Bank, Property Acquisition--
The City of Eagan has been approached by representatives of the Federal Reserve Bank
who have expressed an interest in property located in the northeast part of the community
in the Waters Commerce Park. The Federal Reserve is currently considering three locations
of which the Eagan site is one. While the bank has indicated that its original intention was
to build its facility in Minneapolis to be proximate to the commercial and banking
community there, difficulties in their negotiation for publicly owned property in Minneapolis
has raised the importance of the consideration of alternatives. The Federal Reserve facility
will employ approximately 1,100 employees on an annual payroll of$35,000,000. The facility
operates 24 hours a day with a peak employee presence of 800 people during the day. The
bank is interested in construction of a facility of approximately 500,000 square feet on a
150,000 square foot footprint including a six to seven story tower. It is anticipated the
facility will cost in the neighborhood of $60,000,000 to build.
The Federal Reserve is not requesting financial incentives from the host communities, but
is interested in a competitive but fair market price and a willingness on the part of the host
community to facilitate the development process.
By law, the Federal Reserve must also keep all transactions with banks they regulate at
arm's length. Since the portion of the Waters development in which the Federal Reserve
is interested is owned and managed by banks on behalf of a pension fund, it has become
necessary for Federal Reserve to identify an intermediary to act as a transfer agent between
the current owner and the Federal Reserve. The bank requested that both the City and
County consider playing this role. Because the City itself cannot own property without a
public purpose, it was determined by staff that any consideration of this alternative be
accomplished through the Dakota County HRA acting on behalf of either the County or the
City. At its regular meeting of Tuesday evening, August 11, 1992, the Dakota County HRA
Board authorized its Executive Director, Mark Ulfers, to execute any agreements necessary
to facilitate this transfer. It appears, therefore, that sufficient authority has been provided
in this regard.
As a part of the purchase agreement, the initial transaction will be a series of options on
the property which will be structured such that the County HRA would only purchase the
property contingent upon ultimate purchase by the Federal Reserve. In addition, the
Federal Reserve Bank has offered to cover any costs of administration and consultant review
on the part of the County HRA and the City. The nature of this reimbursement will be
identified within the HRA's agreement with the bank.
While no action of the City is necessary to authorize this action on the part of the HRA,
the City Council may wish to indicate its support for this mechanism to facilitate the
`P
Agenda Information Memo
August 18, 1992 City Council Meeting
purchase of the property since the Federal Reserve does meet the City's economic
development targets of encouraging head of household job formation, attraction of clean
commercial development, attraction of service industries, the location of headquarters and
branches of major companies and the diversification of the City's tax base. As an aside,
while the Federal Reserve is chartered as an entity by an act of Congress, it is a private
enterprise and will pay property taxes in any location chosen.
A copy of the draft resolution in this regard is enclosed on page 19 for your review.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny a resolution
supporting the action by the Dakota County HRA to facilitate an option/purchase by the
Federal Reserve Bank of property located in northeast Eagan as described.
•
CITY OF EAGAN
RESOLUTION
SUPPORTING AN ACTION BY DAKOTA COUNTY HRA TO FACILITATE
THE PURCHASE OF PROPERTY LOCATED IN THE CITY OF EAGAN
BY THE FEDERAL RESERVE BANK
WHEREAS, Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis has
expressed an interest in property located in the City of Eagan for
purposes of construction of their new Twin Cities headquarters, and
WHEREAS, the facility would address various priorities
within the City's economic development master plan including
diversification of tax base, provision of head of household jobs,
and the development of clean service industries, and
WHEREAS, the City and County can cooperatively facilitate
the location of this facility by various means characterized by a
spirit of willingness and cooperation, and
WHEREAS, the Dakota County HRA has provided authorization
for its staff to serve as a transfer agent in the purchase of the
Eagan property by the Federal Reserve Bank,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City of Eagan
endorse the action by the Dakota County HRA to facilitate the
auction/purchase of Eagan property by the Federal Reserve Bank and
FURTHER, BE IT RESOLVED that the City of Eagan welcomes
the interest of the Federal Reserve Bank in the City of Eagan and
will foster a cooperative facilitator environment for review of
appropriate applications in this regard.
CITY OF EAGAN
CITY COUNCIL
By:
Its Mayor
Attest:
Its Clerk
Motion made by:
Seconded by:
Those in favor:
Those against:
CERTIFICATION
I, E. J. VanOverbeke, Clerk of the City of Eagan, Dakota
County, Minnesota, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution
was duly passed and adopted by the City Council of the City of
Eagan, Dakota County, Minnesota, in a regular meeting thereof
assembled this 18th day of August, 1992.
E. J. VanOverbeke, City Clerk
Agenda Information Memo
August 18, 1992 City Council Meeting
COMPREHENSIVE GUIDE PLAN AMENDMENT/REZONING/PRELIMINARY PLAT
ST. THOMAS BECKET ADDITION
C. Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment, St. Thomas Becket Addition, St. Thomas
Becket Church, from D-I (Single-Family Residential) and D-II (Mixed Residential), a
Rezoning from AG (Agricultural) to PF (Public Facility) and a Preliminary Plat Consisting
of Approximately 33.1 Acres for a Church Located Along the West Side of Highway 3,South
of Diffley Road in the Southeast Quarter of Section 25--At its meeting of July 28, the
Advisory Planning Commission considered the above-referenced applications relative to
development of the St. Thomas Becket Church. For additional information with respect to
this item, please ref r to the Community Development Department staff report which 's
enclosed on pages through On for your review. Also enclosed on pages q
through .is a copy of the APC minutes relative to this item. The APC is recommending
approval of this item. Also enclosed on pages 103 through 1 I B is a supplemental
memorandum from the Community Development Department covering a petition from
residents of Lakeside ,Estates and the revised submittals relativ to parking which are
enclosed on pages // through /17. Also enclosed on pages a through Lare letters
from neighborhood residents in this regard. Finally, enclosed on pages /3/ through 133
is a memo from the Community Development Department regarding traffic study and
neighborhood meeting concerning this item and enclosed on pages ,34through /S is a
copy of the traffic study.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny: 1) a
comprehensive guide plan amendment for St. Thomas Becket Addition/St. Thomas Becket
Church, from D-I (Single-Family Residential) and D-II (Mixed Residential), 2) a rezoning
from AG (Agricultural) to PF (Public Facility) and 3) a preliminary plat consisting of
approximately 33.1 acres for a church located along the west side of Highway 3, south of
Diffley Road as presented.
SPECIAL NOTE:
At 2:30 p.m. on Friday, August 14, City staff was contacted by a representative of the
Lakeside Estates neighborhood who said he "had heard" that a Neighborhood Bulletin
distributed by the neighborhood group was to be included in the packet. When the
representative was informed that the bulletin had been submitted by representatives of St.
Thomas Becket Church and was to be distributed, he asked that a correction which was
printed two days after the original bulletin be included. That correction is enclosed on
page(s) f -/33,8
1
•
SUBJECT: COMPREHENSIVE GUIDE PLAN AMENDMENT,
REZONING, & PRELIMINARY PLAT
(ST THOMAS BECKET ADDITION)
APPLICANT: RAFFERTY, RAFFERTY, TOLLEFSON INC
LOCATION: SE QUARTER SECTION 25
(P.I.D. #10-02500-010-05) •
EXISTING ZONING: AG (AGRICULTURAL)
DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: JULY 28, 1992
DATE OF REPORT: JULY 15, 1992
COMPILED BY: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
APPLICATION SUMMARY: Separate applications have been submitted requesting a
Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment from D-I Single Family (0-3 units per acre) to PF
(Public Facilities), a Rezoning of approximately 33 Agricultural acres to a PF (Public
Facilities) district, and a Preliminary Plat consisting of two lots. Lot 1, Block 1, is located
south of Autumn Ridge 2nd Addition and is bounded on the east side of Highway 3. Lot
1, Block 2, is bounded on the west by Highway 3 and the Inver Grove Heights border to the
east.
BACKGROUND: In October 1989,the Archdiocese of St.Paul and Minneapolis announced
the formation of the new church of St. Thomas Becket parish. Farmland on Highway 3,
roughly halfway between Diffley and Cliff Roads was purchased as a permanent site. The
parish community celebrated the first mass in February 1990 at a rented temporary worship
site at Lone Oak Road and Lexington Avenue. Over the past two and one-half years, the
parish has grown to almost 400 families.
EXISTING CONDITIONS: The site is bisected by State Highway 3 and the Soo Line
Railroad and contains areas of severe slopes, cultivated fields,wooded areas, and wetlands.
Northern States Power Company has an easement over the northern 200' of the property.
COMMENTS: The site plan proposes a 23.14 acre Lot 1, Block 1, and a 9.97 acre Lot 1,
Block 2. The church has no current development plans for Lot 1, Block 2. The applicant
is proposing a two-phase total building area of 58,384 square feet, with a total building
footprint of approximately 44,000 sq., ft. and 348 parking spaces based on a 1,200 seat
sanctuary when fully-developed. The first phase is scheduled for a Fall 1992 construction
start. The applicant anticipates a 14-month construction period with occupancy by Christmas
1993. Phase I of the proposal includes an 800 seat sanctuary, a 2,200 sq. ft. sacristy, 4,400
sq. ft. administration area, a 7,000 sq. ft. gathering area, and a 2,700 sq. ft. mechanical area,
for a total floor area of 36,212 sq. ft. Two hundred thirty-eight parking spaces will also be
provided with the first phase. The second phase is anticipated in 1997 and will include 400
additional seats in the sanctuary and 13,700 sq. ft. for a meeting hall area, a 4,300 sq. ft.
social hall, and a 4,100 sq. ft. gathering area, for a total floor area of 22,170 sq. ft. Phase
II will also provide an additional 110 parking stalls.
As proposed, the entire building and all parking areas meet Code requirements. The City
Code requires 343 parking spaces for a 1,200 seat sanctuary and the site plan calls for 348
spaces. The applicant is proposing three access points to the site; Phase I will include a full
access to Highway 3 and a limited access via a cul-de-sac to be constructed at the east end
of Atlantic Hill Drive. Phase II will provide a third access from the existing Tofte Lane cul-
de-sac. Both cul-de-sac access points will be limited in that the church will install gates that
will only be open to allow access on Sundays. The exterior building materials for the church
have yet to be determined.
LANDSCAPING: The conceptual landscape plan is well done. It proposes using a lot of
native plant material that will blend in nicely with the existing conditions. Berming between
the parking lot and Highway 3 will be required with the Final Plat submission. Where
seeding is proposed, a prairie grass seed mix will be used.
PARKS & RECREATION: Parks & Recreation staff will be recommending a cash trails
dedication to the Advisory, Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission at its
. August 6, 1992 meeting.
g 1
GRADING/DRAINAGE/EROSION CONTROLt The proposed development consists of
rolling topography,with dense grass cover and scattered wooded areas. There is a one-acre
wetland (Pond LP-47) in the southeast corner of Lot 1, Block 1, and Hay Lake (Pond LP-
31) along the west edge of the site. The area of Hay Lake on this site is about four acres.
Lot 1 of Block 2 contains a two-acre wetland (Pond LP-30) along its southerly edge.
The preliminary grading plan proposes a substantial amount of grading on Lot 1, Block 1,
and no grading on Lot 1, Block 2. The maximum cut is 16' and the maximum fill is 10'.
Retaining walls are shown in four locations on the site. Detailed plans and specifications
shall be submitted with the final grading plans for the proposed retaining wall construction.
•
The drainage from the new parking lot and roof leaders from the new building shall be
directed to an internal storm sewer system that discharges into Pond LP-47, which is a
designated pond on the City's Stormwater Management Plan. Pond LP-47 currently receives
runoff from adjacent undeveloped areas and Highway 3, and the pond does not have an
outlet. The developer shall petition the City to construct the trunk storm sewer outlet for
Pond LP-47 to Pond LP-31 before the final plat is approved by the City.
The final grading plan shall provide a 30' buffer along Hay Lake to protect the edge of the
lake's vegetation. The buffer should help to limit erosion of sediments into Hay Lake.
Pond LP-47 shall also be protected from erosion of sediments from the site. The
development will be responsible for installing and maintaining erosion control measures in
accordance with the City's Erosion/Sediment Control Manual Standards.
WATER QUALITY: This proposed development is located in drainage basin L. Discharge
from the site will eventually reach Hay Lake, a Class II lake designated to support indirect
contact recreation in the City's Water Quality Management Plan. Because runoff from this
site would degrade water quality in Hay Lake if not treated, on-site ponding will be
recommended to meet all water quality treatment obligations for the proposed development.
This recommendation is subject to approval by the Parks, Recreation, and Natural
Resources Commission.
UTILITIES: Sanitary sewer service is available to serve the church from an 8" line in
Atlantic Hills Drive. However, this line is not deep enough to serve the church's lower
level. Therefore, the church is pursuing an alternative sanitary sewer layout that would
drain to the south through the undeveloped property south of the church site. The sanitary
sewer stub that is available to the south is approximately 1000 feet away at East Greenleaf
Drive. The sanitary sewer stub to the south is deep enough to serve the basement level of
the church.
Water main of sufficient size, pressure and capacity is readily available to serve this
development from the existing 8" water main in Atlantic Hills Drive and from the existing
8" water main in Tofte Lane in the Autumn Ridge 2nd Addition. The water main layout
for the church shall include a connection to both of the 8" stubs and looping the water main
to the south property line for future extension to Cliff Road.
?*>
The final utility plan shall provide an 8" sanitary sewer stub and an 8" water main stub to
the Highway 3 right-of-way line to provide sewer and water service to Lot 1, Block 2, of this
plat.
STREETS/ACCESS/CIRCULATION: Access to the site is proposed in three locations.
The driveway opening onto Highway 3 will require MnDOT's review and approval and the
addition of a right-turn lane and a bypass lane to be constructed on Highway 3.
The site plan also shows a driveway connection to the cul-de-sac on Tofte Lane to the north
and Atlantic Hills Drive to the west. The final site plan shall include the construction of
a permanent cul-de-sac at the east end of Atlantic Hills Drive.
The proposed parking lot and drive aisles shall be constructed in accordance with City
Codes and Standards.
EASEMENTS/RIGHT-OF-WAY/PERMITS: The final plat shall dedicate right-of-way over
the Tofte Lane cul-de-sac and the Atlantic Hills Drive cul-de-sac. The proposed water main
that loops through the site shall be constructed in a public easement.
The development will be responsible for obtaining the permanent and temporary easements
from the property to the south along the proposed sanitary sewer line. The alignment of
the sanitary sewer should be designed to follow future street right-of-way to allow for easier
. access for City maintenance.
The development will be responsible for ensuring that all regulatory agency permits(MPCA,
MnDept. of Health, MWCC, MnDNR, MnDOT, Corps of Engineers, etc.) are obtained
prior to final plat approval.
FINANCIAL OBLIGATION - Saint Thomas Becket
Based upon the study of the financial obligations collected in the past and the uses proposed
for the property, the following charges are proposed. The charges are computed using the
City's existing fee schedule and connections proposed to be made to the City's utility system
based on the submitted plans.
Improvement Use Rate Quantity • Amount
Sanitary Sewer P.F. $1495/Ac 33.11 Ac $ 49,499
Trunk
Water Trunk P.F. $1565/Ac 33.11 Ac 51,817
Storm Sewer P.F. .104/Ac 1,441,364 S.F. 149,902
Trunk
Water Availability P.F. $2470/Ac 33.11 Ac 81.782
Charge
Total $333.000
The areas used include ponding areas. If ponding easements are dedicated to the City, the
area used to compute financial obligations will be reduced, causing a corresponding reduction
in the financial obligation.
•
sv
CONDITIONS FOR ST. THOMAS BECKET ADDITION
1. These standard conditions of plat approval as adopted by Council action on July
10, 1990 shall be complied with:
Al, B1, B2, B3, B4, Cl, C2, C4, C5, D1, El, Fl, G1, and H1
2. All trash and recyclable containers shall be stored inside the building or an
attached enclosure constructed of similar building materials as the principal
structure.
3. Rooftop mechanical equipment shall not be visible.
4. Gates shall be constructed at cul-de-sac access points of Atlantic Hill Drive and
Tofte Lane that will allow access to the church property only on Sundays.
5. All signage shall be subject to the one-time sign fee of$2.50/sq. ft. The sign plan
shall be approved by the City sign inspector.
6. Berming shall be provided between the parking lot and Highway 3 and all
landscaped areas shall be irrigated.
7. Detailed plans and specifications shall be submitted with the final grading plans
for the proposed retaining wall construction.
8. The drainage from the parking areas and building development of Lot 1, Block 1,
shall be directed to an internal storm sewer system that discharges into Pond LP-
47.
9. The final grading plan shall provide a 30 foot buffer around Hay Lake to protect
the edge of the lake's vegetation.
10. The water main layout for this development shall include a connection to the 8"
stub at Atlantic Hill Drive and at Tofte Lane and looping the water main through
the site to the south property line.
11. The final utility plan shall include 8" sanitary sewer and water main stubs to the
Highway 3 west right-of-way line for service to Lot 1, Block 2, of this plat.
12. The final site plan shall include the construction of a permanent cul-de-sac at the
east end of Atlantic Hill Drive.
13. The final plat shall include the dedication of right-of-way over the Tofte Lane cul-
de-sac and the Atlantic Hill Drive cul-de-sac.
14. The development will be responsible for obtaining the permanent and temporary
easements from the property to the south along the proposed sanitary sewer line.
15. City Council approval of the construction of the outlet for Pond LP-47 is required
prior to final plat approval.
ig(
STANDARD CONDITIONS OP PLAT APPROVAL
A. Financial Obligations
1 . This development shall accept its additional financial
obligations as defined in the staff's report in
accordance with the final plat dimensions and -the rates
in effect at the time of final plat approval.
B. Xasements and Rights-of-fray
1. This development shall dedicate 10' drainage and utility
easements centered over all common lot lines and adjacent
to private property or public right-of-way.
2 . This development shall dedicate, provide, or financially
guarantee the acquisition costs of additional drainage,
ponding, and utility easements as required by the
alignment, depth, and storage capacity of all required
public utilities and streets located beyond the
boundaries of this plat or outside of dedicated public
right-of-way as necessary to service this development or
accommodate it.
3 . This development shall dedicate all public right-of-way
and temporary slope easements for ultimate development
of adjacent roadways as required by the appropriate
jurisdictional agency.
4 . This development shall dedicate adequate drainage and
ponding easements to incorporate the required high water
elevation necessitated by City storm water storage volume
requirements.
c. Plans and Specifications
1 . All public streets and utilities necessary to provide
service to this development shall be designed by a
registered professional engineer in accordance with City
codes, engineering standards, guidelines and policies.
2. A detailed grading, drainage, erosion, and sediment
control plan must be prepared in accordance with current
City standards prior to final plat approval.
3 . This development shall insure that all temporary dead end
public streets shall have a cul-de-sac constructed in
accordance with City engineering standards.
STANDARD CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL
PAGE TWO
4 . A detailed landscape plan shall be submitted on the
proposed grading plan. The financial guarantee shall be
included in the Development Contract and not be released
until one year after the date of installation.
5. All internal public and private streets shall be
constructed within the required right-of-way in
accordance with City Code and engineering standards.
D. public Improvements
1 . If any public improvements are to be installed under a
City contract, the appropriate project must be approved
at a formal public hearing by Council action prior to
final plat approval.
E. permits
1 . This development shall be responsible for the acquisition
of all regulatory agency permits in the time frame
required by the affected agency..
F. Parks and Trails Dedication
1 . This development shall fulfill its parks dedication
requirements as recommended by the Advisory Parks and
Recreation Commission and approved by Council action.
G. Water Quality Dedication
1. This development shall be responsible for providing a
cash dedication in addition to/in lieu of ponding
requirements in accordance with the criteria identified
in the City's Water .Quality Management Plan.
N. Other
1 . All standard platting and Boning conditions shall be
adhered to unless specifically granted • variance by
Council action.
Advisory Planning Commission City Council
Approved: August 25, 1987 September 15, 1987
Revised: July 10, 1990
plataprv.con
LTS *2
® @;--D
1
jLA• \
... NE W'
I / I F i n1 it s Z
\,_. ..:
� ' 7PAr- <KES/DE I., r..1010 PCPK
-iT-1 __4,I.IIT.1 LOCATION i ,
M
•
NO r7.1
OAK POMO
HILLS PARK .
LLAN N./1 :
R-I -- I V
E° 'OLE
• V I-2
jf'-' 4. A
MOM
yi A 4400
ZONING _'.� , �. ~�7
'`�tnn►�t -os� 460 9
`.01==r Sand
I. E 1 : - a
Grave l
* A
. A ir A
1
D•II ' { /--
-,
4 •
GUIDE PLAN
Irsvir lip lirap
?arm v o il.
, ,-;)
YAM
V . _.
n %
rrzrof
:►-Ov•`1 il����
. ''� :�W�°1' VlOS3NNIW 'NVDV3 •• !11111; I I I I I I I m
.� '� «�5 t' 13NIJ39 SVWOHI INIVS !,I':,:1 s;iEiiil
I r
o +
1
FE a r , ,
r t' 1= r igi L._—.�.' ' .41W i t '4
°z ' a
ys iw va €.o L_..i._. = E Ea 3
bet h:
__ (111/lr ; Z i!Ict
'•�+�_ !" 1`. N)7 3 =jib 1
Q_: - ... ' k tiff . t
Qom. � — . = _ �& _
rm ► ...16%,•∎•∎ • • .
L.) : layAlth, 1 /16...1114 r1,1 4; .,',1 .'''s3 ! I i
f:C) IV) t. V dor% .NN -,,..jt - ,,,,,,;- 5. I I
■dh.)
inn �''�_'*,• jilt
r� `1 c_,411.3l:
�_
MM
44 /E .( �� . !(1( «.�...mdlGli �', !i
j� •.n.wee. r' =Iliie
1,, u tec.E''� \/� 1C S: 33S kr,,. / / ICE -1
■ •
7
•
•
•
ssZr..11; ?; f +
•., 1-�°Wr►` = r j' V.LOS3NNIW 'NV9V3 ,'''� i t a
! r
.: • ,....—ii:-' :is s= is 13JI�38 SdWOHl INIdS " '' '
���<_l; _?;`:, = NVId 311E
5 + ; a • !!!!
t 1 1 it.i l i • ; I nail a Ei a s E!i! I:; }3t
is ::► t1 _i t ei I tI
.! all * . iiI ( + s
f. •'t:_ti a_1i ill :lit ! 't t it =a ' / .
:ie:: Iht 1St!• Mil
I
42 t ,-� n
1 t t i f• .::_ ! �� a ii�!_�i i i;i t j!_ lit ' Y �'. ®1 I I I Y :x
:. s 7 Ii ?� i �;( 1 i:i R I i!!3I'Ili i t ��
t --
D , 14 ,I /
ox ?
) :.
I
ii
- — _� _
�= ' 'i„.— —•�ySi�wytiin ■
•
_
•
wr. � ' w... __ A— _ '-•t."115_ --�_— .— —, .— , .
IIIII III /I
e
I �E i
• et tell 'i- ii, \_c_pirlic.,-. L__, ..____„.. ,
, .ir ./s sa•i+ .1 a E. • dor.,.:\, 4, \ . , , / , vai .1.•_...__, .._ ..&,,, Jff
\ ;,,,_--,-.4-- . \ 1- •, , ....
.' 01414,hi: ,. a• :. "--- ..•••'"//
I i /./''' A r }}
..t /iv
) i i : f ' I / ...../ . •
. . fr
lL" . ....._
i` I 9 i i 1i iii
fir- .
i
. .._, , r (i's .
4 / . ,
I, r ,ej---"'• 0
fl ilg
;:' ' - vomm00.14 ' i: —•
o.�i \\ I 1
' . (Ay ' -- .'
g ... ,/,71/
9,, o
-. •
Z''''11 :!•.1, 1 j
VIOS3NNIW NVOY3 1;!..!,11:i !I .:I 1 in
•z- te.....,-H •figiri .i
ill .:• '' • i
.7 .....-..I: ; - .•. „. 13)039 SVWOH_L .1.NIVS
..: <:,-,-, th. ni-1;,i..., NVid DNI.LNY1.
w i): g.5.. .,4'...2•.;;;.: -...,
_ . ...- ...
i i!II I ill
P ' i , ' I I iiii i !IA "El' i
, II •••• aatt 99 1 f
1
1 I 1 I I I 'hi
1101 1 1 fu..
Li „ ilf I!! ti; ilil 1 ji, 1 ri,. I .ir 01 i 2-I.:!
l11 ii.;1•:!! fin ;:i! i:i! le III;111111 hliiiilli ilg0,1111,11 ri , • ' / (i ) 1 [1.1111 i 1 iiiiimi :
i ."- , "- --,• ! .,„i„,111„,,.,„,110-nnit Jill' al , ., , u
, a. t. : ,, si: ._,„--1...,..., 1,. „,• ,. , , , 1„.. I I, ,tq ),,,E
31 i i ii I: i :11...- -1,-. • ••„:1::: !: I • \ \ 2 of . . 11 . 1 1 r se.)
, ■ . . .. _ - .::::.- : • • • • - ,
: •• /..
- /
- . .
... ,
..,..
,,
g
-u .
.o
. o...,
i ' .
. r,
\...) \
, .
•
- .. —,
.-.: ...-2-_---.__..
----=:- --,---- - . • . .7.—
• _.. -• • . . . / .,
L3 ,,
_ .
-- -- ---- . do W V Inv.) 5 Ilwnwhilum•Cove-jo,j' •-- • -— — -
- --- .•••••- -, • - -
.. . -
...-- . •
.......... __ — .... s ....4 ., c...... i..— 3,,,
"le ' ' . ' :E ae: j, ' sr - -----vo„... I, ,-, ,•- - _,,: • .... _. .. •..
— - -. 1. 1 „ . 49,.. ... ss„...A._ _ • _ „.--„x„.„.......:_.
. .
L _ '. - • * . oh. ......, ....., ..... .„.:„I, „, sc„ in, i (I
OP lit h,.Z i : ,4%., W‘ /%'%%'' A kly 4;k 4.ft •-•%%., . 74,
t P.',li!Ol , vat r'seir...., vs., i lk.. ,,,I,,o. .,,,, 11,1; „. ••1 ----.Z. A,4■\nER 3E aE" c.1''
.._ - --i'y i' NIZIVIli Ala Irak, AI ,e •••• ,,,e1.072.4 rat •''' or 44, ,,.‘
--------,\, .,..,--------..„.• . • - ‘.... ......, ''tiraW. -"' IIELI"Salrir Q . "it 144 ins.. .<
' ' . ..'• s■ :9 3E.:Ufa P / I 2 si •oxi,\-•
. 2 ; „. ''':\ 1 ' .., • j•••• ,,....7„.. . .......... ....,....., ' t r . -4'4 0.\ -.;, 7
". ' ,\ \ A 41(r• g 7-,---...-itt_x_- --- -4.47, ---N
i 1 °•11 ..1 ' ..„,-' --•-•/ ill ,
A‘
1 ,.,.....,
• )1 lip / - .
• :1..14;-.--ci..-- ■ .1 ;.... , ,) ....." ,
.. 1) ill lif lo. T1 '.........\‘‘.‘Z...ap. 's I %• . /• t7
10.--
i t•
../-•• ■
_.../ "
- • )1.-Ig''•- --.. ...
' i'4 ' I I
e •
/ — -
,....' , / I i -) 1
fr 7 1 I ,
---- ,
) I
e
1111111110111•02,37. 1 4. it • (
CI / / 1 1!P '• • i., '... — ------
• ••
'•1 ' 4 1
' f • . .)
• •. '''
•'
—----:-. - .--. 1,3 /1 s li l' ... ! .,(--
.,,
.
1
9 I •
•
. .
•
„zt2iti
t .LOS3NNIN"NVOV3 ill: !I !1 1 ,
• .$7 V
::,9Y,;1; plii j-
.--
1.3)039 SVIA101-1.1 .LNIVS --
Mild DNIOVEI:
r.q,::.•
...,
....Ore-
_ .... ....-----.
i I! • I II
. - •
{ I, 1111 I .‹ ...
1 i 1
-.■
I 1 I 1 1 1 1 1111 III : .
! Unity
Iv g . r 8 irgli ,
• ..1 ti 111111 Hi I : /111111iii . ; i;
' I :e7 : l' i • Y .I.4
ii ',I iI:i !III WI MI.
.., • 5 i IL! i igi /)/ 1
;..1 1 --- –.
-----
...
' )1
I 1 .
■---____ .....-- –
..--
..--
.„ .-
I
/
,
C) , 4,1 ,
' W '
......'''''
AP,i• ( 1 1
Tj
........
i e
of I
il _.– ---
fr ----
C.)
1
iii
is,--------... . ,
,---
:i. . . .. .. /
■....T.,■,...2.,.................... — ...
____________ ,
..... _. . -.
_
,,
,–.______..L.- zlvi ...! - • . -- ft. — "
— --- -
• ,....-.. —__... - --2-t- .....,, /.. . we • - 77---- ---. .:.- .
— ,
1 ...r
• .
I_
- ----:;--
t■- ,44-....:* Nit, - \-T\-----------LT--------------------- "--,------:4"/
•
-, . ,,,,,1), i, ma, INP',,,,% 4& u.s `■ )...). -.00Nintlic- a . '\ ' - _-_-__A-7--:
\ 4-------.,_
-7-- -----',--7.‘ -----//'
11•■
• 7 „......,''....— \t \
1 \
1 \ ■ I. *"."--77. .II "' 1 .--- 1111 U.. /c(#1: —_--
• k ,_,
..,...,./ !.. _
•-
) .1 1 ,,
• t
r ••, I
t 1 1! ' ■
I\ Pt f#) I
•"
I , ■ • •
4. •;1. Ab, /:).,,,
■
.....i---. ,'
I
# , il I 1 r .
,
. //
•, \
'
. )
( I
e .
1 ..i li (), A( I x_ • I/ 1111111' /
0, V
i 111g • :
I..
/..../._,0....•.-.-..-.....-./,t.,.2_r ij i
-
.
1.\u
_.,•,,,..///,,,
p•
,/
_ ,/ _ ,
, ,
. .,
7.). 6-f • III A:i!:i, I
4-.9‘,J••! T.3 ; Ct.
VIOS3NNIVJ NYDV3
T7 zz,..t.011: I:11i j, , 11.v 1 P;;;1!' I
a- ,1,15',-, ripiin ma IAND38 SVW0H1 1NIVS :,.: l ::;ii;;I i
■-•cal: NY-141001HW NOISOM3 ONY 301/N11410
. 0.•YEW
4
g
I I ED-i
,
h
I .i il! ill fj. Nil ! i
i *I .• . 4. as.
en !•11 -0/
li ih.ha NA kb hiS
!.,;
si i 1 li el' 1
1 . — _ . .
......---- "-- - -- •••.-- -- .._ _----'1
1
"••.—....../ '''
...•••••
.... .....".
Alp_.• / I I .--
'1 /
_... D ,
,
__
.__
_ , ill
..:
o . (
, 1 ! .i.
0
• - .. _ _ -__ .. , / i
- - --.- ---........____
------...,„ ....... imi.
..,
--. ..:. MEMINIMIN;INIMAraniplas4......
•1
:-7 111101111111111111.L__-- - - . .-- - .1--7 ■ - -L'--T. '.' -- - ---- - ----_
.•
, ------- ‹-
1111121r"Mink .,■=1.., - -"r.'".- '
; ...— ■■4.,\ Hkri. ..\,..„14rim,_, , ,Iiii4
. .1, ._,
• /\,..___,..__
1•____-1! --,--:, .....
0 I,ii
I 7
. Is AL,........
, •.. _--,
. _____,.._ , - ii / . . ;,ty va. • r -
fl ._
\ .... _ •.*r.t= irliVil 64 i \ —.”-- / ,-...- -
...—._Thi 1 k. 1//0•••• \ 0.....„--
0:11
Ai-
-
_ ii
., , )
. ..., .. i , / I, i
1 it
,•, , .„ li .
F •
___ .)..,' ____ newli,
{-
ti
,, , - --- :0_ :-/ :
ir 77\ 1.1 ) .._
. , /
• t( /,.. .... ..,. , i •
__.... .
1. , • , , -_, , ,
• . ,- 7
____........4 .
4
q 3
•
1
,L
-7
i
A.,
iIi
III
7 A .
kli . .._._.. >.
aZ
%',,,,,, , D
z0
-- ,-_-
\,. , -k - a
W W
CC -J
O. W
W -1
•
.; = °_ !, VJOS3NNIW 'NVDV3 141; I I I I I I I a
• «-'vytt 13> D38 SVWOH1 . 1NIVS ,'•'�' '�'''"!
•
Z ' ; . ; Ygg
4,1 r r _ • _y 5.
•
• l il 02
7i
�y f
/•AO ,11
' t/awl N 9I I•/1 n M I•/r n SN O.•1 H.•—� t !
i `.♦ [
team I :�: 4 �r, ''11'x,■
:•k: t 1
r
[
I
� ra athvr • ▪ --- ■ !
_1 1= 7b171YluPi�lltS" -
T- 1 r a 1O MT1 TFT ANIT81'-8inc - - -•
r. _ •:••: :• '1e e I•
: T
:�:
t�
[
n ri
T
V
11 i ei
■ i
i .,
\1
..r
'`in �i
I .ii nu• W
*::::::::::::::;::::::::::::.:,•:.:..,: :t::;. :::::x.::::::::.
• • ., :".:1 ::: N.. . 's� Sri:.;•:
!:' '•.L,• .:..' .1 IS:W ffuun W
1111 ) s R N
it U K I UI I,S I./r■ti I,I'ISU •-/ 21i_'IJ WZn
► K W Z N N
11
II •
W
iIi '
g •:-:•:.:.:.:•:.::::::::.:.:.:.:,..::::,,,,,, . .
a
•
4
Z
aCi S.------
FIGURE No. 17
STORM SEWER LAYOUT .
MAP
2.�lb 1 sins •-. . . ..:,+'snit. �) •
AI ga gg pp `I -- -�i Ike r.....,''-`:±u•�_._ .. ''
90 .3 r- I 'dam !►
000.• -∎�1 I+ .•. a
w._�c .' Lam• �� _.
r-r.- art N RCM A KIREAR2
.r zul n gliFOITI 110 Cr-n g JP-6- J'- L '0• '
,i._ -slito i 4:m. .. _ 4.1. 862.0 ' /
h -
��f����..��X88.. .11:4V(',"*.,.♦ r
Ip-•,- -Iii11Ttin1 ��
•112
R
Li l ��:16.2 • l M
AlliiMotrON,4%/IiittsA---05'::::4111, 7;
- i 1 .
0,„-,.,;:v-,..2 II�
A________
� .ESE '— s g; /30" ! $ /'9^2.; CLIFF RD.
3 12P-45
1.a 1 I II I ihn;
I 12. ad Ill"alai
TO
AP I %
. O
0
•
•
LEGEND .
PONDI NN AREA. e
STORM SEWERS WNW •---
STORM SEWERS(reoe•o
41,,,, ...........
STORM
LOT STATION WNW •
STORM LOT STATION t♦aiewsp 0
STORM PONCE MAW ..10 ••♦'♦♦'*
MAJOR DIVISION soNowso wow=
POND NORMAL WATER LEVEL . . . . . . 900.0
MID MOM WATER LEVEL • 900.0
OVERLAND DRAINAGE ROUTE .7.---===.•==.=
9 (c)
CITY OF EAGAN
Water Distribution System
ION � � t 116 lade/06.0 •Cl
v•
h r � �. -_Z •12" �� p Kir It
: •� ,,, Ls.� I
v �,1 , i
`�39.0 -% QY:t
4 j.8 rtift
i 30
to,--,10.Jr, �m�� �`k„i,„4. '
4 . r —
� It--�� ESL
0, l iy�2 et s —• _. tii. -r T B0. N0.42
lT>t�S==��=alb..1cd■ -, 8.7/101.0
--==1 /
•or�r�- �0 00�,or ” G,Tr.�.I 1 it
LE A PT. AO ifir++''-��'71:�11 16 la'
C(,,_t tirmilni4 , LAKESIDE :K '
�4.L. tl♦ I�
7 _Rip 755/9 ciip I'- 59.4 0
4� Vie: A- , - -�= *'T'*♦
• � • .1i VAt er-"YA 1.ArIe�•G/'iii i��i ' J'i .
111 4iSlata-•--4►�i (TTt r �t�'• Wy;1.-•`-`p � I e 41,-.l" ‘1-fir ii.''.- "V 0 go :,-41'21r -"ii 4 ;'-6 ''N_
I�Eg n Wilt` J� 1 ID C IFF RD.
\--/ ' \, NI IBilr
_ik I CC'i• I
o 1.
0
0
c
LEGEND
•
• Existing Trunk Water Main O Point Designations prey ssuretZonee1
--•• Proposed Trunk Water Main --- Pressure Zone Boundary
- Existing Lateral Water Main ■••■■ Existing Pressure Reducing Station
Proposed Lateral Water Mains Proposed Pressure Reducing Station
•— Existing Storage Reservoir ® Pressure Reducing Station Control Elevations
U Proposed Storage Reservoir •••�-• Residual Pressure p.s.I / Static Pressure p.s.i.ctq
Page 10/EAGAN ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
JULY 28, 1992
ST. THOMAS BECKET CHURCH
BT. THOMAS BECKET ADDITION
Chairman Voracek opened the next public hearing of the evening
regarding a Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment from D-1 (Single
Family Residential) to PF (Public Facilities) ,a Rezoning from AG
(Agricultural) to PF (Public Facility) , and a Preliminary Plat
consisting of approximately 33.1 acres for a church located along the
west side of Highway 3 south of Diffley Road in the SW 1/4 of Section
25.
City Planner Sturm stated that this application is proposed to be
developed in two phases. Primary access to this site will be from
Highway 3, with secondary accesses from Atlantic Hills Drive and
Tofte Lane. The Atlantic Hills Drive access would be developed with
Phase I and the Tofte Lane access would be developed with Phase II.
He further stated that the residents of Lakeside Estates have raised
their concerns regarding Atlantic Hills Drive being used as a
secondary access. Mr. Sturm requested that condition #4 be amended to
have the gates open only during worship periods, instead of only on
Sundays.
Tom Cassidy, architect for the applicant, stated that this
development is being proposed in two phases because of budget
restrictions. He reviewed the site plan.
Jeff Childs, 628 Erie Court, stated that he represents 44
households in Lakeside Estates and that all have deep concerns
regarding Atlantic Hills Drive being used as a secondary access. Mr.
Childs gave the Commission members a petition which was signed by 42
of the 44 households. The other 2 households did not sign because one
was moving and the other was on vacation. He further stated that the
residents are very united and have worked closely with the church,
architects and the City to try and find a reasonable solution to
their concerns. Mr. Childs explained the petition for the Commission
members.
Linda Myrhe, 587 Atlantic Hills Drive, stated that there are
currently 23 churches in Eagan and only three of them have accesses
onto local streets. She spoke with various neighbors of these
churches and found that there were many speeders travelling down
these roads who were late to church. She also learned that residents
located near these churches were not happy with the increased
traffic. Ms. Myrhe felt that this application would decrease the
value of her home.
Mr. Childs mentioned that a neighborhood meeting was held on July
27, 1992. He distributed to the Commission members further reasons
why the residents were opposed to using Atlantic Hills Drive as a
secondary access. Mr. Childs stated that the Lakeside Estates
Page 11/EAGAN ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
JULY 28, 1992
homeowners were in the area first and do not feel it is fair that
this is being forced on them.
David Lair, Chairman of St. Thomas Becket Church, stated that the
church is sympathetic and respects the neighbors concerns. However,
they are on time and budget restrictions.
Paul Mesnik, 642 Atlantic Drive, stated that he was concerned
with the safety of the children in the area. He felt that Highway 3
was better suited for extra traffic than Dodd Road.
Brian Larsen, 618 Erie Court, echoed the previous concerns.
Randy Phail, a resident of the area, requested that the
Commission members take a common sense approach to this problem.
A resident at 662 Atlantic Hills Drive stated that when people
realize that the gate is locked they will turn around and race back
down Atlantic Hills Drive.
John Sturmin, 659 Atlantic Hills Drive, commented that the Tofte
Lane access should be developed first because the future homeowners
in that development will know that Tofte Lane is an access to the
church.
Mr. Forsberg, 653 Atlantic Hills Drive, stated that he moved into
the neighborhood two days previously and believed he was moving onto
a dead-end street.
Member Hunter mentioned that a couple months ago the Autumn Ridge
residents were at the APC meeting on a separate application and were
genuinely concerned regarding increased traffic in the area. He
believed that these residents would not approve of more traffic
coming through their area.
Member Merkley asked if City Staff foresaw any traffic problems
with this application. Assistant City Engineer Foertsch stated that
it is not feasible to put all the traffic from the church onto
Highway 3. He mentioned that the City must also be concerned with the
safety of the parishioners.
Member Griggs stated that he was not convinced that the Highway 3
access alone would be feasible. He felt that the Autumn Ridge
residents would have the same concerns as the Lakeside Estates
residents currently have if more traffic was diverted through their
area.
Chairman Voracek agreed that Tofte Lane would disperse the
traffic better than Atlantic Hills Drive, however, he had concerns
with increasing traffic to that neighborhood.
C'n
Page 12/EAGAN ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
JULY 28, 1992
Member Graves stated that the alternative to this application is
having approximately 100 homes built on this site. He felt that the
amount of traffic in one week would be the same with either
alternative. However, the majority of the church's traffic would be
in 1 1/2 days while single-family homes would generate an even rate
of traffic throughout the week.
Member Merkley asked the applicant if they would be opposed to
developing the Tofte Lane access first or develop both accesses at
the same time. Mr. Lair replied that it is cheaper to construct the
Tofte Lane access, however, City Staff directed them to construct the
Atlantic Hills Drive access first. He further stated that because of
budget restrictions they would not be able to construct both accesses
during Phase I.
Assistant City Engineer. Foertsch mentioned that this proposal
makes Atlantic Hills Drive a cul-de-sac street instead of a
thoroughfare street. If a single-family development was built on that
site, the street could possibly become a thoroughfare.
Chairman Voracek mentioned that most of the applicant's
parishioners will come from the north and west of the proposed site.
Member Miller stated that he did not agree with diverting all of
the traffic through Tofte Lane. He stated that he did not agree with
the Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment and if a solution could not be
found to the access issue, the Commission should say "No" to this
application.
Member Merkley commented that there is a need for a church in
Eagan and no development would occur if every application was denied
when a neighbor stated they did not want development near their '
neighborhood.
Rick Bertz, 550 Atlantic Hills Drive, stated that the concerns of
the residents arose when they learned that Atlantic Hills Drive would
be the first access developed.
Chairman Voracek asked for a show of hands of the Lakeside
Estates residents that agreed with Mr. Burtz's statement. The
majority of residents raised their hands. Chairman Voracek then
restated that if both secondary accesses were built during Phase I
the residents would be content and the residents responded "No! "
A discussion occurred regarding the possible access solutions.
Member Graves felt that both secondary accesses were capable of
handling the increased traffic.
Page 13/EAGAN ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
JULY 28, 1992
Mr. Lair replied that because of the church's time restriction,
they would be willing to construct all three accesses during Phase I.
Member Griggs requested that a condition be added which requires
the applicant to construct all accesses during phase I.
Chairman Voracek stated that he was still not convinced there is
not a traffic problem.
A resident of 622 Eric Court mentioned that the church will not
be open only on Sunday, but will be open all week long with various
programs. Therefore, the traffic on Atlantic Hills Drive will
continue all week long.
Member Hunter stated that he would be abstaining from the vote as
he is a member of St. Thomas Becket Church.
Graves moved, Merkley seconded, a motion to approve a
Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment from D-1 (Single Family
Residential) to PF (Public Facilities) .
Graves, Merkley, Hoeft, and Griggs voted for;
Miller and Voracek voted against.
Motion approved 4-2.
Graves moved, Merkley seconded, •a motion to approve a Rezoning
from AG (Agricultural) to PF .(Public Facility) .
Graves, Merkley, Hoeft and Griggs voted for;
Miller and Voracek voted against.
Motion approved 4-2.
Graves moved, Merkley seconded, a motion to approve a Preliminary
Plat consisting of approximately 33.1 acres for a church located
along the west side of Highway 3 south of Diffley Road in the SW 1/4
of Section 25, subject to the following conditions:
1. These standard conditions of plat approval as adopted by
Council action on July 10, 1990 shall be complied with:
Al, Bl, B2, B3, B4, Cl, C2, C4, C5, D1, El, Ti, G1 and H1
2. All trash and recyclable containers shall be stored inside
the building or an attached enclosure constructed of similar
building materials as the principle structure.
3. Rooftop mechanical equipment shall not be visible.
lit
Page 14/EAGAN ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
JULY 28, 1992 -
•
4. Gates shall be constructed at cul-de-sac access points of
Atlantic Hills Drive and Tofte Lane that will allow access
to the church property only during worship periods. •
5. All signage shall be subject to the one-time sign fee of
$2.50/sq. ft. The sign plan shall be approved by the City
sign inspector.
6. Berming shall be provided between the parking lot and
Highway 3 and all landscaped areas shall be irrigated.
7. Detailed plans and specifications shall be submitted with
the final grading plans for the proposed retaining wall
construction.
8. The drainage from the parking areas and building development
of Lot 1, Block 1, shall be directed to an internal storm
sewer system that discharges into Pond LP-47.
9. The final grading plan shall provide a 30 foot buffer around
Hay Lake to protect the edge of the lake's vegetation.
10. The water main layout for this development shall include a
connection to the 8" stub at Atlantic Hills Drive and at
Tofte Lane and looping the water main through the site to
the south property line. •
11. The final utility plan shall include 8" sanitary sewer and
water main stubs to the Highway 3 west right-of-way line for
service to Lot 1, Block 2, of this plat.
12. The final site plan shall include the construction of a
permanent cul-de-sac at the east end of Atlantic Hills
Drive.
13. The final plat shall include the dedication of right-of-way
over the Tofte Lane cul-de-sac and the Atlantic Hills Drive
cul-de-sac.
14. The development will be responsible for obtaining the
permanent and temporary easements from the property to the
south along the proposed sanitary sewer line.
15. City Council approval of the construction of the outlet for
Pond LP-47 is required prior to final plat approval.
16. All three accesses will be constructed during Phase I.
Graves, Merkley, Hoeft and Griggs voted for;
Miller and Voracek voted against.
Motion approved 4-2.
‘
MEMORANDUM
TO: TOM HEDGES, CITY ADMINISTRATOR
FROM: JIM STURM, CITY PLANNER
DATE: AUGUST 13, 1992
RE: ST. THOMAS BECKET ADDITION
At the July 28 Advisory Planning Commission meeting, the Comprehensive Guide Plan
Amendment, Rezoning, and Preliminary Plat for the proposed St. Thomas Becket Catholic
Church along the west side of Highway 3 were approved 4/2. The site is directly south of
the Highline easement and east of the Lakeside Estates addition. One member abstained
from voting as he is a member of the church which is currently meeting in a temporary space
at the SE intersection of Lone Oak Road and Lexington Avenue.
There was a lengthy 2-1/2 hour public hearing with several Lakeside Estates residents in
attendance. There were no residents from the Autumn Ridge additions; however they will
be at next Tuesday's City Council meeting. A major concern of the residents is the potential
for shortcuts from Dodd Road to Highway 3 rather than using Cliff Road or Diffley Road.
Attached is a petition opposing the proposed project which was presented to the
Commission, including 42 of the 44 households in the Lakeside Estates addition. At the
meeting, an additional list with reasons 8 thru 13 regarding their opposition was presented.
That list was generated at a neighborhood meeting on Monday, July 27. Another resident
submitted a list of Eagan churches listing access roads to each church (attached). The
applicants have submitted new plans that change the parking lot configuration, but they do
not affect the overall circulation of the site. Condition #4 was modified to read:
4. Gates shall be constructed at cul-de-sac access points of Atlantic Hills Drive and
Tofte Lane that will allow access to the church property only during worship periods.
Condition #16 was added stating:
16. All three accesses will be constructed during Phase I.
If you would like additional information, please advise. •
•
City Planner
JS/js
PETITION
We,the residents of Lakeside Estates, owning property accessed by Atlantic Hill Drive in Eagan,join
the residents of Autumn Ridge in opposing the preliminary plat that would allow the proposed
St. Thomas Becket Church to use residential neighborhoods as secondary access to its parking
lot. We feel strongly that the site plan as currently proposed will generate a traffic situation that
is dangerous and therefore we respectfully urge the City Council to vote against the rezoning
change. - .
We have taken this position for the following reasons:
1. Safety is a primary concern in the Atlantic Hill neighborhood. There are 44 households along
Atlantic Hill Drive and 94 children under the age of 18.
2. Lakeside Park and playground is only 300 feet from the proposed parking lot access.
3. There are no sidewalks along Atlantic Hill Drive-residents and children must walk in the streets,
even to reach the park. Winter snow accumulation will compound the problem and force any
pedestrian traffic to mix with church traffic in the street.
4. This is a very large church. Seating capacity will be 1200 in phase II, and the parking lot will
hold about 340 cars. We expect one mass Saturday night and three on Sunday morning - based on
St. John Neumann, which is about the same seating capacity. This implies a peak of about 1020
cars on Sunday morning (coming and going) for a total of 2040 trips.
5. The access path from the church parking lot along Atlantic Hill.Drive to Dodd Road is over 1/2
mile long and passes by 44 homes. There are no stop signs to slow traffic; the 1/2 mile stretch will
contribute to higher traffic speeds especially when people are late; there are curves and inclines
which create blind spots. The street under these circumstances simply cannot support on-street
parking, pedestrian traffic and heavy two-way traffic for a very large church. Of the 23 churches in
Eagan, not a single one has an access that even approaches 1/2 mile before a major road is •
reached. Not one passes by 44 homes. (See attached Church Access Summary). This proposal is
a highly unusual and hazardous request.
6. During exit times, there will be a steady stream of traffic 1/2 mile long. Residents who live along
Atlantic Hill will not be able to back out of their driveways or go to church themselves.
7. Because of the relatively sparse population density in Inver Grove Heights, and Koch Refinery's
expansion, most parishioners will be traveling from the north and west - which will make the
residential accesses the preferred route.
8. The Planning Commission was divided (4-2) in its recommendation of the site plan. After weighing
residents concerns about public safety, the Commission pursued the strategy of opening as many
secondary access routes as possible in order to "disperse",traffic into residential areas. It was only
in this context that the site plan was recommended by the Commission. This dispersing
concept is only effective if both secondary accesses are built and only if developers build additional
outlets from the secondary routes onto Dodd and Diffley- and at this point, it appears these outlets
will be slow in coming, thus concentrating traffic on Atlantic Hill Drive and Hackmore Drive
rather than "dispersing" it.
9. The original intention of the parish building committee was to provide two primary accesses to
state Highway 3. We believe this is, by far, the safest alternative. It appears from the
correspondence file that the state (MnDOT)was never approached with this proposal or if it was, it
was not pursued strongly. This alternative deserves serious investigation.
10. As future safety improvements for Highway 3 are studied, we believe that the exit plans for the
church could be designed as part of the whole solution and we urge the city to work with the state
until a safe alternative can be found. Residential access is not the answer.
\04 (Continued on Back of Sheet)
PETITION (Continued)
11.The original site plan recommended the use of gates or chains across the secondary accesses which
would be open only for Sunday services. The Planning Commission then amended the conditions so
that the gates would be open for "normal worship times", yet the minutes from the meeting read
just"worship times". This is very vague and could be interpreted to mean just about any meeting
at the church. Worship times should be specified, and a fixed number of days and hours each day
should be defined for.the whole year. If the agreed upon schedule is ignored in the future, the
residents are also concerned that they have no recourse, since the gates would be on private
property.
12.While it may be tempting to allow the church to solve the city's street termination difficulties by •
building cul-de-sacs at the church's expense, if the overall plan is a hazard to residents and
parishioners,then public safety must not be compromised for economics.
13.There are 23 churches in Eagan. All but one have very short accesses to a major street as shown in
the Church Access Summary. There is no precedent anywhere for the city to allow a large
church to have a driveway through a residential neighborhood in excess of 1/2 mile long. One
small church, Community of Joy, which relies on residential access reported that neighbors have
already registered traffic complaints, even though there is only space for 80 cars in their parking lot.
In contrast the proposed church will see a peak of 1020 cars in one day. Please, let's not repeat
this mistake on an even larger scale.
Signed,
0144 j Name Address #Children
S53 L04 .
ilia_ At- z__
,b 4- 9 ,7lieAIN
. 1. _A �, c 7 3 '42i .
ii , 97 arVe dAtite -
• I
Rev. 8/8/92
L
PETITION (Continued)
11. The original site plan recommended the use of gates or chains across the secondary
would be open only for Sunday services. The Planning Commission then amended the econdditiionns so
that the gates would be open for "normal worship times", yet the minutes from the
just "worship times". This is very vague and could be interpreted to just about any meeting
at the church. Worship times should be specified, and a fixed number of days and hours each day
should be defined for the whole year. If the agreed upon schedule is ignored in the future, the
residents are also concerned that they have no recourse, since the gates would be on private
property.
12.While it may be tempting to allow the church to solve the city's street termination difficulties by
building cul-de-sacs at the church's expense, if the overall plan is a hazard to residents and
parishioners, then public safety must not be compromised for economics.
13. There are 23 churches in Eagan. All but one have very short accesses to a major street as shown in
the Church Access Summary. There is no precedent anywhere for the city to allow a large
church to have a driveway through a residential neighborhood in excess of 1)2 mile long. One
small church, Community of Joy, which relies on residential access reported that neighbors have
already registered traffic complaints, even though there is only space for 80 cars in their parking lot.
In contrast the proposed church will see a peak of 1020 cars in one day. Please, let's not repeat
this mistake on an even larger scale.
Signed,
Name Address #Children
Ii i /
1.14La All ‘Li (41 di
•
•
O r Rev. 8/8/92
PETITION (Continued)
. 11.The original site plan recommended the use of gates or chains across the secondary accesses which
would be open only for Sunday services. The Planning Commission then amended the conditions so
that the gates would be open for "normal worship times", yet the minutes from the meeting read
just"worship times". This is very vague and could be interpreted to mean just about any meeting
at the church. Worship times should be specified, and a fixed number of days and hours each day
should be defined for the whole year. If the agreed upon schedule is ignored in the future, the
residents are also concerned that they have no recourse, since the gates would be on private
property.
12.While it may be tempting to allow the church to solve the city's street termination difficulties by
building cul-de-sacs at the church's expense, if the overall plan is a hazard to residents and
parishioners, then public safety must not be compromised for economics.
13.There are 23 churches in Eagan. All but one have very short accesses to a major street as shown in
the Church Access Summary. There is no precedent anywhere for the city to allow a large
church to have a driveway through a residential neighborhood in excess of 1/2 mile long. One
small church, Community of Joy, which relies on residential access reported that neighbors have
already registered traffic complaints, even though there is only space for 80 cars in their parking lot.
In contrast the proposed church will see a peak of 1020 cars in one day. Please, let's not repeat
this mistake on an even larger scale.
Signed,
Name Address #Children
Lefi.*\ tc2► � - 2*ill._,..t.14:2
511 ,C1-k\ezv—k,c MI\
5M- Att o.c4,4 - 4
(-)
1`■t... . •
\iss , /,, d /.44 'cia-61X-4-4v'di—. CA - . 11.
1 cI 1 , ( ( cl ( fi&kl5(--ik ('4 /. ., ._.
410,211"111AM35Wiliglir'' i■Agb •
A V r .
41111MO/
/ ,
Lpq Rev. 8/8/92
.
PETITION (Continued)
11. The original site plan recommended the use of gates or chains across the secondary accesses which
would be open only for Sunday services. The Planning Commission then amended the conditions so
that the gates would be open for "normal worship times", yet the minutes from the meeting read
just "worship times". This is very vague and could be interpreted to mean just about any meeting
at the church. Worship times should be specified, and a fixed number of days and hours each day
should be defined for the whole year. If the agreed upon schedule is ignored in the future, the
residents are also concerned that they have no recourse, since the gates would be on private
property.
12.While it may be tempting to allow the church to solve the city's street termination difficulties by
building cul-de-sacs at the church's expense, if the overall plan is a hazard to residents and
parishioners,then public safety must not be compromised for economics.
13. There are 23 churches in Eagan. All but one have very short accesses to a major street as shown in
the Church Access Summary. There is no precedent anywhere for the city to allow a large
church to have a driveway through a residential neighborhood in excess of 1/2 mile long. One
small church, Community of Joy, which relies on residential access reported that neighbors have
already registered traffic complaints, even though there is only space for 80 cars in their parking lot.
In contrast the proposed church will see a peak of 1020 cars in one day. Please, let's not repeat
this mistake on an even larger scale.
Signed,
Name Address #Children
. 9166 h CA,Cd7 i 1028 { iE Co weT, 63,964J 4
G/g- ., cr 3 o.� Ln,LA.,. ,
q c
(1Vtid,,r _, 609 z ,,tfzc A4/0 2
-� , I Pori 4-10 << 1 • tilt 9 .� Of . 3
a a_ , _// v- 4.q.. / A ,_ - . __,•-4. . 17 b. _._,A.i,„. A 6-----
i '4
.; 416.4 .+ . l /iirir. �c 7 ' 3
42,,1.4 f- r A' 0.s-a. 6.20 Er,e C`V 4
T To . 4- Ole (,3° Prflethtfic TTY Is bg• c2
11,41Li t a o
(off Erie_ C.,4'' a
7e-vpr_ V- , , , _ (/36i� .« c� , 2
c Si�fl� / ,. _ �� t�_ # dL4 2. 0 •
til,# • -_4M1111=1_ nr„, - I 57 V ■, ' e 0 e..42Z ‘Air--.
•I. '. • 4 .\ .S \ ._ . .& A..\ ... , _ ∎�..
4 i ; / 41
Oir
t C)C1 . Rev. 8/8/92
PETITION (Continued)
11. The original site plan recommended the use of gates or chains across the secondary accesses which
would be open only for Sunday services. The Planning Commission then amended the conditions so
that the gates would be open for "normal worship times", yet the minutes from the meeting read
just"worship times". This is very vague and could be interpreted to mean just about any meeting
at the church. Worship times should be specified, and a fixed number of days and hours each day
should be defined for the whole year. If the agreed upon schedule is ignored in the future, the
residents are also concerned that they have no recourse, since the gates would be on private
property.
12.While it may be tempting to allow the church to solve the city's street termination difficulties by
building cul-de-sacs at the church's expense, if the overall plan is a hazard to residents and
parishioners, then public safety must not be compromised for economics.
13. There are 23 churches in Eagan. All but one have very short accesses to a major street as shown in
the Church Access Summary. There is no precedent anywhere for the city to allow a large
church to have a driveway through a residential neighborhood in excess of 1/2 mile long. One
small church, Community of Joy, which relies on residential access reported that neighbors have
already registered traffic complaints, even though there is only space for 80 cars in their parking lot.
In contrast the proposed church will see a peak of 1020 cars in one day. Please, let's not repeat
this mistake on an even larger scale.
Signed,
Name Address #Children
orman, grivir"
• , " A.,
l' 1111111 •� i�_ ■
-/Ariffell11111' lfrltglMAP7- Dr
sus . _�. oar !�. i/ 11
1°. IFIMIFWAIRMIll
grariMal
•
•
•
1 .^� Rev. 8/8/92
ikr& )t.1171 14-1g
1 . Advent United Methodist
3945 Lexington Ave
Access off.. of Lexington, a county road
2. All Saints Luthern
3810 Lexington Ave.
Access off of Wescott Road,
3. Beautiful Savior Luthern
4150 Pilot Knob Rd
Access off of Pilot Knob, a county road
4. Cedar Grove Baptist
1985 Diffley Rd
Access off of Diffley or Rahn (county road, CSAH)
5. Cedar Ridge Christian Church
2024 Rahn Way
Access off of Rahn Way but in a light commercial area
b. Chapel Hill Baptist
4888 Pilot Knob
Access off of Pilot Knob Road, a county road
7. Christ Luthern
1930 Diffley
Access off • Co Rd 30
8. Church of St. Thomas Becket
1080 Lone Oak
Access off Co Rd 26
A-"9. Community of Joy ***
Northview Terrace
ACCESS OFF OF A LOCAL STREET
10. Eagan Alliance
700 Diffley Road
Access off of Co Rd 30
roll . Eagan Evangelical Church
4100 Lexington Way
Access off of Co Rd 43
4 12 . Easter Luthern
4200 Pilot Knob
Access off of Co Rd 30 or 314.
13 . Faith Church of Glory
2401 Pilot Knob Rd.
Access off of Co Rd 31
•
14 . Harvest Fellowship
3584 Kennebec Dr. -
Access off Shawnee, alocal street but in business area
15. Living Word Luthern
4300 Nicols Rd
Access off of Nicols, a county road
16. Mary, Mother of Church
3333 Cliff Rd
Access off of Cliff, a county road
17. Mount Calvary Luthern
3930 Rahn Rd
Access off of Rahn, a CSAH
18 . Peace Reformed Church
2180 Glory Drive
Access off of Glory Drive, a private road for the
church itself
19. Oak Hills Church
Meets at Northview School
Access off of Co Rd 30
20. Praise Lutheran
670 Diffley Rd
Access off of Dodd, a county road
21 . SS Martha and Mary Episcol
Meeting at Deerwood School
Access off of Deerwood Drive, not through a residential
area
422 . St. John Neumann
4030 Pilot Knob Road
Access off of Co Rd 31
,
23. Trinity Lone Oak Lutheran
Highway 49 and 55
Access off of a trunk highway
\\
Eagan Church Access Summary
Church & Address Primary Parking Lot Entrance Secondary Parking Lot Entrance
Park Access Distance to /Houses Access Distance to #Houses
-ing Connects to: Major Road until Major Connects to: Major Road until Major
(Major Road Road (Major Road Road
1 Advent United Methodist Lexington 40 ft. 0 — — —
3945 Lexington Ave. (Co. 43)
2 All Saints Lutheran Wescott Rd. 50 ft. 0 — — . —
3810 Lexington Ave.
3 Beautiful Savior Lutheran Pilot Knob 150 ft. 0 — — —
4150 Pilot Knob Rd. (Co. 31) _
4 Cedar Grove Baptist Diff ley 50 ft. 0 Rahn Rd. 30 ft. 0
1985 Diffley Rd. (Co. 30)
5 Cedar Ridge Christian Church Rahn Cliff 50 ft. 0
2024 Rahn Way Road (Commercial)
6 Chapel Hill Baptist Pilot Knob 100 ft. 0 —
4888 Pilot Knob Rd. (Co. 31)
7 Christ Lutheran Diffley 30 ft. 0 Beaver Dam 30 ft. 0
1930 Diffley Rd. Rd.
8 Church of St. Thomas Becket Lone Oak Rd 30 ft. 0 — — —
1080 Lone Oak (Co. 26)
Church of St. Thomas Becket 340 Highway 3 60 ft. 0 Dodd Rd. 0.5 Mile 44
(Proposed) Ph II (State) (via Atlantic Hill (w/culdesacs)
Dr.)
Dodd Rd. X0.7 Mile n+46
(Now) (via Hacl®ore (w/culdesacs)
Dr.)
9 Community of Joy 77 Northview 2 blocks 14 — .-
Northview Terrace Terrace `_
10 Eagan Alliance Church Diffley 150 ft. 0 — — —
700 Diffley Rd.
11 Eagan Evangelical Covenant Lexington 1 block 0 Diffley 2 blocks 3
4100 Lexington Way (Co. 43) via Lex. Way
12 Easter Lutheran Diffley 30 ft. 0 Easter Lane 1.5 blocks x6
4200 Pilot Knob Rd.
13 Faith Church of Glory Pilot Knob 50 ft. 0 — — —
2401 Pilot Knob a kta Bus. P1 Co. 31 Commercial
14 Harvest Fellowship Kennebec to x2 blocks 0 — — —
3584 Kennebec Dr. HW 13 (Commercial)
15 Living Word Lutheran x80 Nicols Rd. 75 ft. 0 Diamond Dr. 1.5 blocks 7
4300 Nicols Road
16 Mary, Mother of the Church 639 Cliff Rd. 50 ft. 0 Cliff Rd. 50 ft. 0
3333 Cliff Road(3 accesses) (Co. 32) _ (Co. 32)
17 Mount Calvary Lutheran Rahn Rd. 50 ft. 0 Rahn Rd. 50 ft. 0
3930 Rahn Road
18 Peace Reformed Church Nicols Rd. 500 ft. 0 — — —
2180 Glory Drive(private Dr.)
19 Oak Hills Church Diffley 30 ft. 0 — — —
Northview School (Co. 30)
20 Praise Lutheran Church Dodd Rd. 50 ft. 0 — — —
670 Diffley Road
21 SS Martha&Mary Episcopal Deerwood 2 blocks 0 — — —
Deerwood School _
22 St. John Neumann x440 Pilot Knob 30 ft. 0 Deerwood 1 block 3
4030 Pilot Knob Road (Co. 31) Drive
23 Trinity Lone Oak Lutheran Highway 55 50 ft. 0 — — —
Highway 49&55
Prepared by volunteers from Lakeside Estates; Distances are approximate; "x" = estimates; Rev. 8/12/92
t.ofet riTP-17
oare
ADDITIONAL SUPPORTING REASONS
(Emphasized by residents at the 7-27-92 neighborhood meeting)
We, the residents of Lakeside Estates, are opposed to the plans of St. Thomas Becket Church to use
Atlantic Hill Drive as a secondary parking lot access for following additional reasons beyond
those stated in the original Petition (dated 7-25-92):
8. Of the 23 churches in Eagan, only one has a significant exit through a residential neighborhood.
Neighbors of this church (Community of Joy at Lexington and Diffley) have already registered
complaints of traffic - even though there are only 60 parking spaces in the lot and just a few
houses along the residential street. The site plan implies access by 1/2 of 229 cars per church
service through Atlantic Hill Drive which is 1/2 mile long, which has no sidewalks, accesses 44
houses, contains 4 cul-de-sac intersections, and has a playground adjacent to the street.
9. Because of the large lot size in adjacent Inver Grove Heights, and Koch Refinery's plan to buy
up surrounding land, most parishioners will be traveling from the North and West - which
would make Atlantic Hill the most likely access path - not the intended Highway 3 "primary"
access.
10. A letter went out from St. John Neuman' Catholic church recommending its parishioners
consider St. Thomas Becket's planned facility if they lived in zip codes close to the proposed
church. We believe that this will accelerate the church ramp-up time so that we would have an
immediate traffic problem on Atlantic Hill.
11. There are over 100 children that live along Atlantic Hill Drive and its cul-de-sacs. (About 94 of
those were under age 18.)
12. Because the parking lot would empty so slowly there would be cars exiting at the same time as
people were trying enter Atlantic Hill for the next mass. Residents living on Atlantic Hill would
not be able to back out of their driveways during exit times.
13. Residents are concerned that they will have to foot the bill for solutions the traffic problems
once the church is built: Costs of sidewalks, widening the street, increased wear and
maintenance on the street
CONCLUSION
42 of 44 households in Lakeside Estates have signed the petition opposing the use of Atlantic Hill
Drive as a secondary access. Only two did not sign - one household was on vacation, the
other was in the process of moving. Residents signing the petition included several St. Thomas
Becket parishioners. These people said they would gladly drive around to the Highway 3
access and did NOT want access through the neighborhood. The residents feel that if the
church and city cannot work out sufficient accesses to a main road like Highway 3, without
routing major institutional traffic through residential neighborhoods, then the Comprehensive
Guide Plan Amendment should be refused.
Revised July 27, 1992
� �3
Z66■ I I cr`' ^:,:,A1n-338
;`_•� WW uj6' 1j 1 ;! d1OS3NNIW 'NVDY3 iii I I� I I I I. I N i
`"0_ t 13ND38 SYWOHI 1NIVS s I'!!''!' '°`'I"I
r.c-<iii c), ill: NVId ails
I ,_ M—_
i • =
=i
C:::ZI 11i �i; �'. 1• t4 I . *a i i` • 1 I 111 ! ,
i I I;I ` p{_i`' r a— > - I IA t,i :1 t, 11!I1 1� ' €
LLI II
tiii-� tEft{ij:/�• . � II, �1� '�#: .l I�[ l i t tLl ; a• .,
. Cd0/11111)
�" .. -
, • f!:(
�s`�� /, � � _ - - ( ( / i ( Ill. i %,,• /
� — _ - \
0) , I ' \ 1 , o
��� ' •\•
- k
s L _ _
f-' -,.. 1 AA. &
low-\--- , .„/„.
t M /
4._
j.,,,,..,L_____,; $.611; illpplIliinii- ,---. op,., ,l_niii...7... .:77%- --_,t7: -----=-7- -.2::
' .-- ---— isa-kk ,, et v. he,=.;,:::::::A.:,,,Yr--, —1".."14k---. ....--- ..------------..------I
NIN lb.
___ -..„.‘',,,N: •A A, ' W4%. A*• -.•
•
\ ---- -1.- .\ • .V ;-(- • ' 'IlitilhkiN4 .,__._ II ) .iN
DM LAIL(I/ %.- :4‘....,,,s, \\\ - \ _ ,1/ .-&0#""—,.. r •\ , -.=,-,
' Th' E_-,-.7-7.-7-: , 's ; ,,, \. i • ' •-!.-----. . A- - 114,,_t 1.--*::-.4 A . \NII\11,-,.. --- .
- ,- \ %,,‘ ,s,,:v, ',-1 : ' ' ----7-Nraksi ,- i...., • - Ns/ .4 ' —,
f ■ , s , ,
A / f ---- ' ___„„ ,:...„,,,,■ ,1 e . , .... .-\ . ... 1 '''' *-111;111111.11i."" 4 ' • : ***-1:
N,,,_,*\\'.1 \ ,, . _ _ .'<NirW ,:i=lia . - 4 ./ . • •'' ''-'----
111 , 4 I. 'Z"/
' i i'..' t i . ......
, \ r
‘ , \ .. • • 1 , , . . i • , ..,_
i) ....jti.. ,__(
... •
. _. _....
. i .,•k .
....,, .. ,.. ._ ..,/, , , .
__.
,, . ,/ ,--,,, ,., • , .
, •
• .
...... . •
�i
____, , agif„,p
I III ir ' b� • ,
11/ l'i' 2//-:.-.--",',r_ .,,
,.. . 4 _„/ ,,
. , , ,,„ , ,` rI1 . , 1 •,♦
•
•
•
•
L(L( ,
Z66 I I 0:::, 0 3 t,'7:�3 e1
u��
;4.9u. 1 ` jp i'$ V1OS3NNIW 'NVJV3 v'{(i i 1 ;t � ! I i! I �.,
• w7 ,11411l till #li IIllitill''tsllis! !
« iii, 13NND39 SYWOHI 1NIYS
Mild DNICIVE10
A
Li! it if I'' !I d; �t 4 ! I hi ! i i:
. . , 1 ., 1[0111 Illihi I a si ! 1 !tA I/� _ •4,- i71,- '
II1• t1,lN 11 '0 ' l'I i ,,
1C 1,.._'__&_1.. 1. � � _ .
•
_ , (or-:-- -
. / ( ( ( �
LL '
, ,i O \ ` \ �`« \ :•',
LL ,
- I
\. II;
-„,,-,- - _ _. _ .,\._- _ ) )y 90
i
air _
T _ � L—_-- -c /— � •
L'Iih.
'F_----__--.. - ' *1 Vial,,,..., i- •"" .1 ,h■--144- ,-- --: --- -' -„, i-
_,....,,--___._ .„,4 \ ,e:
(Of 1 1
-...e....—:,- - - A iii-\- ip Ad\ ----Es‘ - :7'--)Sti*Ik ‘
L—AL---7----—7-0.---=titieb ' .4. 1■011°- (_1 ., 1411 -■ 1 iii I/n '
" .--al/---ift '4444,.. 4fli "- to_:.,. •ft47,_.,4sv-- -\\ 11 / /-,.
1...... 1\ ____ . li \ \ _..z. 1.o " 41.,,c4v t 4, ,-.:7; • V' k_ t 10._ --_
i//,- ,__
A , p ,-----(--7---N, ,`N . ,\,\ 1 1 ' _.__• ---- 72-----41,',*. j.-';'4•-•74,1A:\, 14/,/ _-_-__,
. .A\-.4/1 i // \ IL '.•'\■ \\ I r ---- '' .i'VI "-Tar*I\ till&: '
* 1 I.._=L- ( . 1 ioll fie ii*. • -: . - \ .. oil g- . ‘
\, ]-z
, i 1 AV :' ." '
',Iir ' 011 % 1. 1 ' _s '4%.t.:,....,'
\ , .\ . t i Oil Z111114 <4
1 : '\ If ,. ;it gi:--4 - ei ' ' . ...._
,i ) � ��f ( I
III II(� - ///_•-=�/i7 � " l !,y
•
. /1 (
- 'E"ii' P111111 .
VIOS3NNINJ NVOV3
I 1,mi3 1 11111
-t-
Ilillit 1, 11 1 ! 1 1 .. '
13N D38 SV H
INO1 I N IVS ,.
„,„'" ,..„...„,„.„„,,, ,,
1‘ ,...Calt .\77. lall
•
•
ill, 40:_t[iin
: ----i
I
:I. a
3 1 I
. --...
,
r )
I"
r
1
_....... / .
..._..-- ,.••
I /
_)
/
D f
...,-
qi,
0
/ )1 ( _
.,1
-- :----.
,.:..1 .1 - - - /
i „................. z..
lielourammegmenr
•-1
--_____ -....:____...= IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIWI ,.............
_ _ • — iii_ ,-- - - -_:-_-_---__=•_ _,_-,-— -________z-_______________--: -
7____,____. =•.E.,_ _ .-_ :. 1 _ _,. - : , ,-_-.______:,-;-,-----------.-----,9_7
1----
•
, A_ .4
....,_____,..___ _-
1 / .-\ - --Ni-chic------------- -0/9---------I,
-_-,_„-.„, , .
r.. ------ -- - I. ,
..,,,,,,,a01, I ,,, , \ • , 4,0, ,-_.
-.., „,,,,,,,,,,_._
t _ ,4.t \ \ --,7/
, p ._..- _ ,
A I I - \\ ,\ 1111IN40 ;61,41 k.\--....i, // -
-,-;1w '' // a_,_-_,--
.a././1 -4(, ' 1
\I •) -71' IIHH1*------------ - - - - 1111Wk....1! jy:L.
----..----_, I -L.
1 - 4 ___
--. _ a ' I I / ■. - it a I 1 I 1 P. 1 r \'N
...-- Li Abbr.---
i err
..... ...
/ ,- Nit------ , 1 , . -- a.___...."..-
\ By
/
ip ,
.4abw
_ ,
I
. ,
, h
-41(—Lr.,, " - • ,
1/ ' $ I
d I iis .
(
III ri IIIIIMPOOKIPIIIrl ' i i
t I ) ' -'/
w "',-*-n-_,--/, =Nu --1,11
ii 1( //- -- Ar Fy IP1144. 11 ` \‘,/,
.. _ 2 / 0 ,.
nit
16,
- , \\.
s
H {1- 1 IT I 1 \ v•
,Il 111 ! \ . I ' -- i - YMI 1 Ill 1 i
-4-
,
t
filiii 1 4 ii e: LI
,.. ,.„ ...
+ .
. .. , R8
, i ,
1 (Le
Z6v. t i .- ; c� X113 3 3 ei
1-1"q :�2W= ° ffljj ill VIOS3NNIW 'NVDV3 t.'9j• i I
CI 1
«�� t� .L 1138 SdWOHl 1NIdS Mild ,mod
rest,<11i ev- !gill:
Ji '-. , R YhtrL .this aWi= y,r /J��
.p
1- --"dj ' 1 H:111±1,41.1 i NAL r 1_1 i �= F iillIn IN Iri 11i hi Ii aJt1Fii'. i I'iii1Iiik'!` il
1 ii
i al I I j/!I Ii �,'''''e f I--- I=e= 1= r 0 1 i.ii i\!.DIL01., ••/
wish, i 1 7
r ,I.,
-:.1 D «
.....--- 1
,.
.....•
,. , _ _--„ _
__
O IC !
, •
. --�: _ _ i 1
__________........- . . ... .,_ . _
_ ......______
_____ ....:____,„.. mom
7________ ..... ::;:u .._:, . - _ • _ ________ .
Norm■is
r __ _ mow_ _ —
v��L"7 _ -°_ .noon 1
_ _ _ _ _
. _-_=__: ,_._ ,
. v641! u ...-, ,2,1N .;__,_:;.....„......-.-.7.-..-;;;,,-_-_:---_-.__-_:_,_,__.:„,.. . ..4.0.06.-,_ - -.- -- - --
; i. ,,, .„; .4 ...eoieramotempalumiEr.s-=---__-_-_---__________
; ;4 i.., ..,:-.....„ .4 0;7 4 ..7.7 4.-40.1.--7- '‘.,.,,w.,_•4,..,-. ■•••, 4,...._ 1 jt
t:---.. .,e---- ■ fi• :ii*:' i .,-,fr4:.'' A z7111"100A-' . - ---,..,..
li,y! -4....,,,;,...ei, .. ',4,.:17.V.- 41.4.1 --is., 1:tillitil----: if
vv.... ,
i
L - - -z,--40. _..4.--* vi pv t .1: „„re.. ‘.• .,,. .....,.,_
.. 4,\ ..._ 14.27"4..;..i* ,s'Z...t,...,„e„t„& Pi,.C. der,-.0.0...-:r ,ii! s, • . . • . • '\ I. ,- -...
� i \ Ct3f�� !r/r -T -\\a„b. \• --„,,,z,,,,,.
J oft”1 Iii r+ L_/Li. , . •. ... :... .,,r ilit!;4, ..C.,.......„,...4.14, •:,i , ,:
g . .1 ikts: Li__ --a ...,/:::, itrz..., :4,, .____ _
I 1 I Ir."1. •
•4 .�ii..� .�i Li ._.--.... )4 i i ii
III I III
� �� r / �� 1
���� i�/ 1 ae�e i� F
-.rem Viii ; . . r ;(
. ..,....,, ■-4....”7 41
------I .
< <-
628 Erie Court
Eagan, MN 55123
August 10, 1992
•
The Honorable Mayor and City Council of Eagan
City of Eagan
3830 Pilot Knob Road
Eagan, MN 55122
Dear Mayor Egan and members of the Eagan City Council:
I am a resident of the Lakeside Estates development in Eagan and am writing to you concerning the traffic
access for the proposed St. Thomas Becket Church. Under the preliminary site plan, the street accessing our
neighborhood, Atlantic Hill Drive, is proposed to become a secondary traffic access to the church parking lot.
I, along with the majority of the residents in our neighborhood, seriously object to the plan to use our street
or any other residential street for access to the church. The increase in traffic due to the anticipated size of
the St. Thomas Becket Church congregation (seating capacity up to 1200 people per service, in Phase II)
would critically change the nature of our neighborhood and create a hazardous safety problem along our street.
There are 94 children under 18 years old who live in the 44 households in our neighborhood; there are no
sidewalks; the neighborhood park is at the end of the street close to the proposed access to the church
property; and there are 28 driveways which directly connect to Atlantic Hill Drive. Allowing this volume of
traffic to use our street as a "driveway" to the church is not only dangerous for our children and residents,
but an unusual and uncommon use of residential streets within the City of Eagan.
There are 23 churches in Eagan and only one has a primary access to their parking lot through a residential
street. This is the Community of Joy Church which has a small congregation and parking space for about 80
cars. The 14 residents along the street are already reporting traffic complaints, which indicates the use of
residential streets for church access is not a good idea. The proposed plan for the St. Thomas Becket Church
is of much greater magnitude and affects a larger number of residents. Please do not make our neighborhood
prove, once again, that a bad idea will not work.
Please consider the proposed site plan and preliminary plat for the St..Thomas Becket Church carefully. The
traffic issue and the safety of our children is of major concern and should not be approved based on a "easy"
solution by using residential streets. Other alternatives must be found. If this situation cannot be resolved
without using residential streets for access to the church, then I respectfully request that you vote against the
rezoning of the proposed property.
•
Thank you for your careful consideration of this situation.
Sincerely,
Deb Childs
bz.$Fie,e.Caukr
GG,A+.J. MLl 5S i 23 •
(
August 11, 1992
The Honorable Mayor and City Council of Eagan
3830 Pilot Knob Road
Eagan, Minnesota 55122
Reference: Rezoning of land owned by St. Thomas Becket Church on
the East side of Hay Lake
Dear Mayor Egan and City Council Members:
I am writing to ask that you do not approve the rezoning of land owned by St.
Thomas Becket Church from agriculture to commercial. I am forced to ask this of
you since it is my firm belief that the Eagan Planning Commission has not
seriously taken into consideration the unsafe traffic conditions which will exist
if the church is built with exits as they are now planned and recommended by the
Eagan Planning Commission.
Common sense and logic tells me that Atlantic Hill Drive cannot handle the number
..of vehicles which will be exiting from the church parking lot to Dodd Road,
without creating very unsafe conditions. Our neighborhood has close to 100
children, play patterns of the children have been established (which include
walking or riding bicycles/tricycles in the street to get to the park on Atlantic
Hill Drive) , there are no sidewalks, and nothing is in place to control excessive
speed between the church driveway and Dodd Road. Sight lines are also bad and
it is questionable whether or not the street is wide enough for this type of
traffic when parked cars and snow is taken into consideration.
Common sense and logic also tells me that Atlantic Hill Drive will turn out to
be the "path of least resistance" for exiting parishioners. Highway 3 is very
difficult to enter onto and also very unsafe at that section of the highway, and
the Toftee Lane exit is a very indirect route to get to either Dodd Road or
Diffley Road.
Allowing a large number of cars to exit onto a residential type of a street
through a small , established neighborhood is unprecedented in Eagan and is
allowing for a high risk situation where a tragic accident would more likely
occur. Personally, I must do everything I can to make sure my two boys do not
have to live and play in this type of an environment.
I would recommend, as one possible solution, that the church further negotiate
with the Minnesota Highway Department to allow two exits onto Highway 3. If this .'
were approved, an exit would not be required into our neighborhood and I would
gladly desire to have St. Thomas Becket Church as a neighbor.
Page Two
I would appreciate it very much if you would take into consideration my request
as you make you decision regarding this item on August 18. Thank you very much.
Sincerely,
r
Randy L. Thiele
596 Huron Court
Eagan, MN 55123
August 10, 1992
•
To the City Council:
lam writing to express my great concern about the proposed zoning change and
preliminary plat that would allow the proposed St. Thomas Becket Church to use residential
neighborhood streets as secondary accesses to its parking lot.
I am a resident of Lakeside Estates, owning property in which my driveway accesses onto
Atlantic Hill Drive. I am very concerned about the amount of traffic this church will
generate and thus I am concerned about the safety of my four young children and the other
90 neighborhood children. Because I am an active member of St John Neumann, I am aware
of how active a catholic church is to meet the needs of its large membership. The church,
not only has activities during the weekends, but also during the week with religious
education, daily mass, holy days, baptismal and other sacramental classes, to mention a
few. I am aware of the church's proposed use of parking lot gates and I do not feel the gates
will lessen the amount of traffic. I fear the gates will be opened most of the time and when
they are closed, I fear traffic will travel the street to only have to turn around or even
possibly park in the street and walk through the gate.
Atlantic Hill Drive is a narrow residential street, 1/2 mile in length, with 38 private
driveways and four cul-de-sacs which access on to it. There are no sidewalks along.the
street, therefore the residents and children must walk and ride their bikes in the street,
even to go to the park. There are no stop signs to slow traffic and there are times now cars
travel at a speed I am concerned with. There are curves and inclines which create blind
spots and I've heard screaching of tires to avoid a child who ran into the street one too many
times.
i strongly believe that using a residential street as an access to a large public facility
such as St Thomas Becket is a saftey hazard for its residents. I also believe other churchs
must feel the same way because ail but one church in Eagan have their parking lots access
onto four way roads, not onto a narrow residential street.
Please carefully consider my and the other residents concerns reguarding church traffic
and vote no to rezoning the proposed site from residental to public facility if the church
must use residential streets as secondary accesses to its parking lot.
Thank you.
Carey :rbec
659 Atlantic Hill Drive •
LD-
8-11-92
Honorable Mayor Tom Egan and City Council Members
I am a resident of Lakeside Estates . I live at
587 Atlantic Hills Drive. My name is Linda Myhre.
St. Thomas Beckett Church bought a parcel of land
located just east of my home. They plan to build a Church
and to have one of the accesses to the Church via Atlantic
Hills Drive. I want you to know that I along with many
neighbors in Lakeside Estates (40 out of 44 homes) strongly
protest this plan. We respectfully request that you consider
this matter very carefully and that you decide not to allow
the Church to have an access to their facility via ANY city
(residential) street.
1) The curch bought this land without first obtaining
a rezoning. The land is currently zoned for residential--
single family homes . I feel that like any other business,
the Church should have bought the land only after they got
a rezoning permit or contigent upon getting one.
2) There are currently 23 churches in Eagan. Only one
of these has direct access off of a residential street. That .
one is the Community of Joy Church on Northview Terrace. Their
congregation is significantly smaller than St. Thomas Beckett' s
and so is their parking area. There are fewer homes on Northview
Terrace than on Atlantic Hills Drive and there is only one
intersecting street. We have four. We also have a city park
located just 300 feet from the proposed access to the Church.
Also, I spoke to the Pastor' s wife from Community of Joy. She
said that the neighbors have complained of the traffic and the
safety problems it causes . Therefore, they are currently working
with the county to obtain access to the Church from Lexington Ave.
3) The proposed access to the Church is about 6/10 of a
mile east of Dodd Road. Traffic along Atlantic Hills would be
able to achieve a speed higher than the posted 30 mph in that
length of time. Atlantic Hills is a residential street. With
the large amount of traffic that would be travelling to and from
the Church, this would significantly endanger the pedestrians
travelling in the area.
4) The planning commission was divided in their decision to
send the proposal on to you for consideration. One member
said that he felt that the traffic from the Church would
endanger residents and suggested that if the Church couldn' t
get access off of Highway 3, that they should consider moving
locations . I agree! I feel that they should have thought about .
the traffic and the hazards it would create to neighbors before
they bought the land in the first place.
5) The Church said they would have a gate up that they would
only open to our street on "worship days" . Who is going to decide
which days are worship days. Further, who will be able to
enforce this once the Church is erected as the gate will be on
their property. A Church has many other activities besides
worship such as daycares , Bingo, community activities , weddings ,
funerals , etc. Traffic would be a constant problem.
6) I have no objections to using the land for residential homes
as it was zoned for. Even if there were 100 houses down there,
the traffic would not be constant and heavy as it would if there.
was a Church as large as the one that is proposed.
7) As a comparison, please consider the traffic problems caused
on Denmark Drive (which is wider than Atlantic Hills and is not
a curved street) from St. John Neuman Church. Also, again as
a comparison, look at the traffic from the High School. Again,
Braddock is a lot wider than Atlantic Hills but the volume is
a good comparison.
8) In conclusion, I feel that the Church has a problem. They
bought the land without having it rezoned. They didn' t consider
the hazards the traffic would cause to the people living
immediately near it. They need to find an alternative safe
access to their facility or the City Council needs to vote
down their plan to build at that location. Just based on
past practice, only one other Church has access off a residential
street and they are trying to change that at this time. I don' t
think that my family and those of my neighbors should have to
have their safety jeopardized because of the high amount of
traffic that would be routed down a residential street.
Thank you for your consideration on this matter.
Linda Myhre 454-0879
V).3
August 10, 1992 T. A. Gutzmann
616 Crimson Leaf Court
Eagan, MN 55123
Eagan City Council
Eagan City Hall
3830 Pilot Knob Road
Eagan, MN 55122
Dear Councilmembers;
I am a resident of the Autumn Ridge Development located behind
Pinewood Elementary School and I would like to voice my opinion
on several upcoming City Council issues.
1. The rezoning of the property in the SE 1/4 of Section
25 (along the west side of Hwy 3) from residential to
public facility.
2 . The Preliminary Plat proposed by the architectural firm
representing St. Thomas Becket Church for this
property.
I am in favor of the rezoning from residential to public facility
for use as a church.
I am opposed to the Preliminary Plat for the following reason:
The current plan calls for three access points to the church
property; One to Hwy 3, and two through the residential
neighborhoods of Autumn Ridge and Lakeside Estates. With an
estimated 350 cars per worship (at peak) , the traffic through
both residential neighborhoods would not be safe considering the
number of children located in each neighborhood.
One compromise the church agreed to at the Planning Commission
was to put gates at the two residential outlets which would
opened only during church services on Saturday evening and Sunday
morning. I feel this is not acceptable. This will reduce the
amount of traffic during the weekdays, but we will still have
hundreds of cars traveling through our neighborhood during normal
worship hours.
As you are well aware Autumn Ridge currently has ONLY one access
at Hackmore Drive and Dodd Road and we already have busy traffic .
in this neighborhood. I am not sure when the second access at
Diffley will be built, but with the high traffic potential from
the church project, traffic from Hawthorn Woods, Pinewood
Elementary and from Autumn Ridge Phase I and Phase II (A) ,
Hackmore Drive cannot safely handle this traffic flow. Granted,
the traffic from Pinewood and the church project will occur on
different days of the week, but it is still traffic we will have
'2
August 10, 1992
Eagan City Council
to contend with and worry about our children's safety when riding
bikes or walking to the park.
The Autumn Ridge and Lakeside Estates neighborhoods are just that
- neighborhoods. Previous standards established in other Eagan
neighborhoods would not allow this level of traffic, and I see no
reason why Eagan residents in Autumn Ridge and Lakeside Estates
should be the exception.
I strongly urge you to not approve the Preliminary Plat proposed
for the St. Thomas Becket Church Project until it is redesigned
to eliminate traffic flow through the neighborhoods of Autumn
Ridge and Lakeside Estates.
Thank you for your time and efforts. Please give this matter the
consideration and priority it deserves.
Sincerely,
l
Timothy A. Gutzmann
August 7 , 1992
The Honorable Mayor and City Council
c/o Ms . Karen Finnegan
City of Eagan
3830 Pilot Knob Road
Eagan, MN 55122
Re: St . Thomas Becket Catholic Church Addition
The Honorable Mayor and members of the City Council :
As a resident of Autumn Ridge , I oppose the Planning Commission ' s
recommendation to allow residential access between St . Thomas
Becket Catholic Church and the Autumn Ridge development .
The Panning Commission ' s recommendation is in direct conflict with
earlier Commission recommendations (and subsequent approvals by the
City Council ) which amended the plans for further development in
Autumn Ridge Phase II and Hawthorne Woods additions .
In previous decisions , this City Council , has unanimously agreed
that no further development could be constructed in both the Autumn
Ridge and Hawthorne Woods additions until such time as a permanent ,
secondary access is provided. At this time , there remains only one
access to and from the above referenced additions . In my opinion ,
allowing residential access to St : Thomas Becket -Church constitutes
"further development " and, consequently, should not be approved.
I urge all City Council members to vote no on the proposal to allow
residential access through the Autumn Ridge and Hawthorne Woods
additions for St . Thomas Becket Catholic Church.
Sincerely,
04,t,, C. O61-1-IL'
Homer C. Laird
628 Hackmore Drive •
Eagan, MN 55123-3042
( 612 ) 452-6609
l � �
• /1-1,(q /I, 9
6;:hi Cour) cLC Irt&e-4,s,
JaK
I y ti 019,tich?)5
cornmencitLY-7.; G. -Pkt. .Plect.) / ..-19-
_ co rr) eln -iv 7-011 c- 41-t_e et-eld 4-0
PF pei'e skhe _ ca-nsfrr,ect-wy) _
• . -Theo s_ 4 eck.c.t-- _CA eit..t-c1-1 kv 44-1 a cc c5S
41-/et/ /7 I is 7)o'r v
WuiiIe Lut, v< zbi:e chl 11.°
pt,cpct,se a
ace es-s- 4.0 , .S" ene./9‘ ;-ica __
p e 67( 1.1-7 ;'7 e 4 tiz,vy 3 77
c-nekec kid/ OLCCLS s 4-0 041-14■1 -7. .W //s
AO t.ti e ic & Agazaild_.
-77-) et/u ro / a _cA die,c
• .
kvit,e,‹ 6-e towt 4,t 41/
31-a.z-LX1.ed c/I-C S4 /,-)• 4-).--a 65 .,
• tev /I re /In -10 Af-ta. 16_C
/iilIs "Prt,&.f .
• , ethit 40i_ __et.,!<„,-, •
--t-ALc d4 --11:1-Lt cevvvo leze • et 41.-ztrAc
14.1.ova.4 aleci.v.<0( <Aft,c_
)0/0 ,1 *fly erwn 5
I -11,4 retpo _
Co✓L4- Z
* Hs . -
of 7:14.4 app_co /;.ila&& CAlAKC t- /t)
a,cc e.S s h s-rc — _•c°s id-c4-hca sew
cam s ?..Q c,G PktaX- c Lug is_
a."-, .e_.moo_ Pck
. of - -s _ Morena s 3eCkcz x/ •
akzs no -- s tin ye. ox_. s a-c
. Sfz,- o;, f a./-1‘( is Co r?-1
Q K S-4 11.,C,6 __ c e s-s Lk K -
_ suca-, praif C - - -- -- -
red c ck u --K c 4_01E11 end c�- -i —off ?` -• ---
. Oa.)n i 'i L m m rss /L use /14-t 6 c
St 77,awias $cU�c, _—flu h. ' w;it
.LL p"s. ,t_ _ -__ _�!- ..__i ; -�.�a _ /ee n
(Ai/4- ss --yam _
. l 1 c• ) ,cA.ei-kCI __�caM-erw<aX?e?"K) •-------
_ -
_ 9 mom_3 _
5'/2 3 _ _
h,9
•
August 6, 1992 '
Eagan City Council
Eagan City Hall
3830 Pilot Knob Rd.
Eagan, MN 55122
RE: Proposed Re-Zone for St. Thomas Becket Church to be
Presented at August 18 Meeting
As residents of Autumn Ridge, we ask you to please NOT approve
the Eagan Planning Commission recommendation to re-zone the SE
1/4 of Section 25 (along Hwy. 3) from R-I/R-II and AG to PF,
which would allow St. Thomas Becket church to be built with
secondary traffic access through the Autumn Ridge and Atlantic
Hill Drive residential neighborhoods. No traffic studies have
been completed for this proposal, and we are extremely concerned
for the safety of our children and the other children in our
neighborhoods.
The church is planning to accomodate 1200 parishoners, most of
whom live north and west of the church site, so natural traffic
flow would tend to be through the residential neighborhoods to
the north and west of the church, i.e. , Autumn Ridge and Atlantic
Hill Drive.
We understand that the church was rejected by MN DOT for two
planned accesses off Hwy. 3 and will only allow one primary
access. Routing the huge volume of traffic through neighborhoods
full of children is not the answer to the traffic access problem
-- it merely compounds it. Our neighborhood streets were not
planned with the intention of handling large volumes of traffic,
and both neighborhood accesses flow onto Dodd Road, which also
couldn't handle the volume adequately. Clearly, someone needs to
do their homework.
We feel that it is clearly a case of taking the easy way out for
the church and the City Planning Commission to recommend routing
their traffic problems through our neighborhoods. This increased
volume of traffic would create a dangerous safety hazard for our
neighborhoods and not just on Sunday mornings. Large parishes
serve their members seven days a week with Christian education
classes, church group meetings, weddings, funerals, etc. St.
Thomas Becket would be the second and certainly the largest
church in Eagan with significant access through a residential
area. Community of Joy is a significantly smaller parish and
• they are experiencing neighborhood traffic problems.
Proposed Re-Zone for St. Thomas Becket Page 2
Please vote NO on the proposed re-zone of this land if it is
presented with secondary traffic access through the Autumn Ridge
and Atlantic Hill Drive neighborhoods. Clearly there is a better
solution to the traffic situation, even if it takes somemore time
and money to complete a traffic study and find an answer that
serves the needs of both the church and their new neighbors
(taxpayers) in Autumn Ridge and Atlantic Hill Drive.
Sincerely,
Randy and T'erese Bringgold
592 Hackmore Drive
Eagan, MN 55123
��O
MEMORANDUM
TO: TOM HEDGES, CITY ADMINISTRATOR
FROM: DALE RUNKLE, DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
DATE: AUGUST 13, 1992
RE: ST THOMAS BECKET DEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL
Since the July 28, 1992 Advisory Planning Commission meeting, there have been a number
of issues raised regarding the impacts the church would have on the surrounding
development. Staff has suggested to representatives of St.Thomas Becket Church that they
look at the specific concerns regarding traffic circulation for this development. They have
agreed and have suggested to the City that they will cover the cost of a traffic study to
quantify and provide factual information as to the impacts with development of this site. On
August 13, staff met with representatives of St. Thomas Becket to review the preliminary
findings of the traffic study and hope to have this study included with the background and
packet information on Friday. If this information has not been completed, the traffic study
' would be provided with the administrative packet on Monday.
In conjunction with this traffic study, a small neighborhood meeting will be held at the
library on Monday, August 17, 6:00 p.m. to present findings of the traffic study to
representatives of the church and selected representatives from the surrounding
neighborhood. This will then give them the background information on the traffic issues and
what, if any, impacts may arise. Also, attached is a "Neighborhood Bulletin" submitted to
us by representatives of St. Thomas Becket Church who received this bulletin.
Director of Community Development
DCR/js
Attach.
.NEIGHBORHOOD BULLETIN
(printed by interested Lakeside Estates residents - for Autumn Ridge & Lakeside)
(SUMMARY of the 7-28-92 meeting of the Eagan Planning Commission)
• As item F on the agenda the city staff representatives reported on the proposal submitted by the architectural
firm Rafferty,Rafferty& Tollefson for the St. Thomas Becket Church.
• Rafferty, Rafferty & Tollefson then made a presentation of the site plan which included traffic/access plans.
The objective of the presentation was to persuade the commission to amend the Comprehensive Guide Plan,
rezone the property in the SE 1/4 of section 25 (along the west side of Hiway 3) from R-1/R-II (residential)
to PF (public facility) and some of the land from Agricultural AG to PF... and further persuade the
commission to approve the Preliminary Platt as proposed by the architect.
• The commission then opened the meeting to public comment. Residents of Lakeside estates raised concerns
about safety of children and residents along Atlantic Hill Drive, and objected to its use as a secondary access
to the church. (Highway 3 is the primary access.) Concerns included: the proximity of the park/playground
to the church exit, no sidewalks on Atlantic Hill, blocked driveways during Saturday and Sunday masses, w.94
children under 18, length of Atlantic (.5 miles) with no branch-offs to disperse traffic, demographics of the
parish which encourage the residential area access as the primary access (the main population density will be
NW of the church), concern that of 23 churches in Eagan only one other (Community of Joy) has a
significant access through residential areas, and concern over who would be assessed for street/sidewalks etc.
if these modifications were required to solve future safety/traffic problems.
• Finally, the commission closed the meeting to the public and debated - at length. Of the 7 commission
members, most agreed that there was a traffic problem. Also they were concerned not only about the safety
of the residential neighborhoods, but also the parishioners exiting onto Highway 3 into high speed traffic. The
commission was fairly tolerant of allowing more residents to speak with very short statements, even during
the closed part of the meeting - even though they weren't required to do so.
• The church agreed to use gates at the exits into residential neighborhoods (Lakeside Estates and Autumn
Ridge and the future Hawthorn development - east of Autumn Ridge) and only open them during "normal
worship" times. This concession by the church came only after it appeared the commission would shut down
the whole project. The church refused to consider pushing any harder on MN Dept of Transportation-to allow
another "primary access" to Highway 3; also rejected the idea of buying land for frontage road•along 3
towards Cliff as "too expensive" and were very concerned about losing weeks in their building schedule to
allow for further conditions/negotiations or traffic studies-(none have been done yet).
• Finally, Gary Graves on the commission put forth 3 motions:
• To approve the amendment of the Comprehensive Guide Plan for land use. Approved 4-2.
• To approve the rezoning of the land to PF. Approved 4-2.
• To approve the Preliminary Platt (Site Plan) with condition that gates would be open to Autumn
Ridge/Hawthorn and Lakeside Estates only during "normal worship" times. Further condition that there
would be no "phasing" in the secondary access plans, i.e. both Atlantic Hill Drive exit and the Toftee Lane
exit toward Autumn Ridge would be opened in Phase I. Approved 4-2. (1 abstention on all 3 motions)
REACTION
In our position, we stopped short of outright saying NO to the church. We were far from unanimous on this
point in our neighborhood meeting Monday 7/27, and when the commission asked "Well are you for this
church or against it?", we were far from unanimous at the corvnission meeting. Perhaps many of us
hoped that the church would be willing to find safe access plans to the church without cutting
through residential neighborhoods with a good portion of the 400 cars (1200 parishioners) once on
Saturday night, and three times on Sunday. All residents I talked with after the meeting felt that there
was a lack of responsiveness by the church building committee, but were fairly pleased with the
commission's receptiveness. After listening to over an hour of residents' safety concerns, the church did not
VY;
say anything about safety except they felt strongly that the church had done everything the city staff 11x3
suggested regarding the site plan, and it had been very expensive to accommodate proper drainage/street`"
termination etc., and if we were to ask for other options to be explored for traffic, or to request a traffic
study, then they might delay their construction schedule by weeks. One of the residents (who is a faithful
volunteer youth teacher at St. John Neuman) indicated that she was planning on joining St. Thomas Becket,
but said she was very concerned about traffic and would oppose the church if necessary - even then the
church team did not seem to hear!
As I talk to residents more, they are concluding -we think the church just chose a poor site- and chose to take
a chance on rezoning it after they-bought it. In all fairness to the church planning committee, they probably
expected the state to approve 2 primary accesses to Highway 3 - which is what they originally asked for.
But here we are now, and according to the city, it's not safe to route ALL the traffic onto Highway 3.
According to residents it's not safe to route 1200 parishioners per service through neighborhoods.
STRATEGY
We have tried to work this out with the church by suggesting other ways to "disperse" traffic. Maybe it's time
to take a firm stand: No access through any residential neighborhoods - and recommend that the city
council not follow the recommendation of the planning commission and not amend the Guide Plan and not
rezone and not approve the preliminary Platt. Please note that if we take a stand against the plan and the
city votes it down, they can still send it back to the planning commission for "further study" - to come up
with more traffic options. In other words, we may need to say no in order to get them to slow down, step
back, and propose a safe plan.
• Do you think this is too tough of a position?
•Do you think we can win at city council with this position?
• Is the best (or only) way to get the church to take other "primary" accesses seriously (like frontage
roads/accesses to HW 3) to defeat the rezoning solidly at city council?
• If we "lose", will the church choose to route traffic indirectly through several paths through neighborhoods, or
will they just choose one or two -because it's cheaper and delays them less?
•Does anyone have any ideas of how to get the church to listen?-Do we know any leaders in the parish?
". tough questions!!
1.Please be thinking through your opinion and talk to neighbors about it. We need to be clear and unified if we
are going to be effective in approaching the city council -especially if our position is to overturn the
recommendation of the Planning Commission -as opposed to modifying it.
2. We need to be in dialogue with the Autumn Ridge residents. Hopefully we can reach a clear consensus and all
sign one petition -this won't be easy- i.e. it took us quite awhile to move toward consensus in Lakeside,
and I expect the same in Autumn Ridge.
3. A few representatives from Lakeside plan to meet with Autumn Ridge next Tuesday,August 4, at 7PM
at the Pinewood School playground - to minimize need for baby sitters. If you are interested in listening to
Autumn Ridge's concerns, please come. We will have another meeting later to get into the nitty-gritty-this
is just a get-aquainted meeting.
4. Our preliminary plan is to draft a petition that (hopefully) everyone(both neighborhoods) can agree on, sign it,
and turn it into the city one week before the August 18 City Council Meeting.
5.After we reach a consensus, and about a week before the council meeting, we should start calling council
people and letting them know our concerns- especially if you know them personally.
Thanks for your patience in an emotionally trying situation-many of us have lost sleep over this one... It will
have lasting impact on our families.
Ted Wachter 456-0412
City Council Members: Phone Tom Egan(Mayor) 452-3957
Tim Pawlenty 688-6105
Pam McCrea 454-7427 August 1, 1992
Patricia Awada 452-8795 I 53
NEIGHBORHOOD BULLETIN (CORRECTIONS & CLARIFICATIONS)
(printed by interested Lakeside Estates residents-for Autumn Ridge&Lakeside-informal, not for public distribution)
(regarding residents'reactions/opinions to the 7-28-92 meeting of the Eagan Planning Commission)
Purpose: This bulletin responds to inaccuracies in the "Neighborhood Bulletin" as pointed out by a member of
the St. Thomas Becket building committee. The "Neighborhood Bulletin" was circulated for neighborhood
use in Lakeside & Autumn Ridge on 8-2-92. It was an informal, non-public, one-sheet bulletin which
summarized the opinions of Lakeside residents and tried to discern the position and posture of the church
and city as the residents perceived it. It was not intended to be an objective recounting of what was said
at the Commission meeting - the Commission minutes (5 pages), which were obtained later, served this
purpose. After the Commission meeting, emotions ran high in the neighborhood, and unfortunately, the
bulletin reflected this. This paper will look at each section in the previous bulletin, try to correct
misstatements, and clearly distinguish opinions and facts. It should be noted that only changes in the
previous bulletin will be described -this does not restate all the discussion.
SUMMARY
The "Summary" was a very condensed description of the flow of the meeting from the residents perspective.The
fifth paragraph was in error, however. It said, "The church agreed to use gates at the exits into residential
neighborhoods ... and open them only during 'normal worship' times. This concession by the church came
only after it appeared the commission would shut down the whole project." This statement should be
replaced by "The church agreed to use two exits immediately in Phase I, controlled by gates, into both
residential neighborhoods (Lakeside Estates and Autumn Ridge), only after, in the opinion of the
residents, it appeared that the commission would deny rezoning for the project." The church proposal,
advocated opening one access in Phase I without the other access until Phase II. The residents took issue
with this and proposed that the other access be opened first. The commission debated and in the opinion of
the residents, seemed to come to a consensus that the Highway 3 access alone was not sufficient, but that
Highway 3 plus two residential accesses would be sufficient for the traffic. The commission then asked the
church if using both residential accesses in Phase I would be acceptable. "Mr. Lair [of the church committee]
replied that because of the church's time restriction, they would be willing to construct all three accesses
during Phase I." (from minutes) Earlier, (in the meeting) he had stated that "because of budget restrictions
they would not be able to construct both accesses during Phase I". (from minutes) We believe this
progression of the meeting influenced many residents to formulate the stated opinion on zoning.
Also in the fifth paragraph, we stated "The church refused to consider pushing any harder on MN-Dept of
Transportation..." Correction: the church didn't say this at the meeting and it should not have been in the
"Summary" section. It was the opinion of the residents that the church would not be willing to approach
MNDOT again for a second Highway 3 access... based on the posture of the church representative in phone
discussions. This was an uninformed opinion which offended those on the committee. As stated in the
bulletin, the church did initially ask for two accesses to HW 3. Dave Loehr in a 8-10-92 phone call indicated
that St. Thomas Becket has had three meetings with MNDOT, and that two HW 3 accesses were pursued.
He also stated (phone call) that his committee tried to encourage the city to have an access plan that was fair
to residents. He stated that the city directed the church to use only one residential access in Phase I, and thus,
it was not the church's responsibility that it was unfair. Dave also stated on 8-4-92 (after the bulletin was
written)that they directed the architect to re-approach MNDOT regarding more HW 3 accesses.
Also, in paragraph five: "The church... was very concerned about losing weeks in their building schedule" ...the
church stated that this was an unfair statement, and said that losing "weeks" now could actually result in
several months delay because of the approaching winter and possibly because of city proceedings (as we recall
the statement).
REACTION
In this section of the bulletin, a church representative was offended because he thought that the hand vote at the
commission meeting was "anti-church". Our position: As stated repeatedly, the residents are opposed to
the traffic, not the church - if the traffic concern be resolved. The opinion statement, "Perhaps many
/ 3A 3
of us hoped that the church would be willing to find safe access plans to the church without cutting through
residential neighborhoods with a good portion of the 400 cars (1200 parishioners) once on Saturday night,
and three times on Sunday" should be replaced by the more accurate opinion statement, "Residents of the
neighborhood hoped that non-residential accesses could be worked out by the church and city so
that (the approximate) half of 350 cars (or 1200 parishioners) per service exiting from the parking
lot once on Saturday night, and three times on Sunday, would not travel through residential
neighborhoods." The rationale for the "half of 350" was based on observed parking lot traffic and was
presented at the commission meeting.
Also in this section, the church representative was very upset that the residents perceived a "lack of
responsiveness" by the church committee. In his words "time and time again" at the meeting he stressed
how the church had complied with the city's standards and requests. Our position: The residents did
perceive a lack of responsiveness. Dave Loehr, from the church committee spoke in the public part of the
commission meeting, after the residents itemized safety concerns in detail. He gave the history of how the
building committee worked very closely with the city, complying with directives, and held informational
meetings with residents. Unfortunately, the overwhelming majority of his comments did not directly
reference traffic or safety-which is the single most important issue to the residents. He said very briefly in
closing that he did sympathize with the residents' concerns. It is the our opinion that the emphasis on
compliance, budget, and schedule significantly overshadowed the safety concerns. The city's minutes also
reinforce this assessment of the priorities stated by the building committee: "David Lair, Chairman of St.
Thomas Becket Church, stated that the church is sympathetic and respects the neighbors concerns.
However, they are on time and budget restrictions." We believe, unfortunately, that this treatment of
priorities raised the emotional level and further polarized the neighborhood on the traffic issue.
The church representative stressed that the church could not respond to some concerns because they were
brought up in the closed part of the meeting. It is true that a few residents aired concerns in this part of the
meeting, and thus the church could not respond fully. It must be pointed out, however, that the same
concerns had been raised earlier in the public portion of the meeting - so there was opportunity for
response.
Also in the "Reaction" section: "...we think the church just chose a poor site - and chose to take a chance on
rezoning it..." This statement was very critical of the church committee's judgment. Even though a similar
statement was made at the public commission meeting, we would like to retract it from the "bulletin", since
we are trying to work with (not against) the church and city to resolve serious safety issues. Finally, in this
paragraph, traffic numbers should be corrected to read "According to residents it's not safe to route
approximately half of 1200 parishioners per service through neighborhoods."
STRATEGY & CONCLUSION
In this final section, we discussed ways to influence the city and church to find access plans which do not require
traffic through residential neighborhoods. In many residents' opinion, the development is moving ahead too
quickly- before safety is adequately investigated. We are not willing to compromise the safety of our kids.
We are all going to be neighbors for a long time, we hope. We believe we have some very tough
negotiating ahead. In the process, we will try to treat all parties involved with respect.
•
Thanks for your involvement and patience.
August 12, 1992
/355
08/14/92 10:19 FAX 612 490 2150 SEE ST. PAUL 444 EAGAN ih 002/010
=5E11 MEMORANDUM
Amor
INGINIERSAARCOTECFS•PLurrEss 35351MaMAs CENTER 02lF5ZA1(A,Iev4 155710 612 4601000
TO: DALE RUNKLE, DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
TOM COLBERT, DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS
CITY OF EAGAN
TOM CASSIDY, PROJECT MANAGER
RAFFERTY RAFFERTY TOLLEFSON ARCHITECTS, INC.
FROM: BOB BYERS
DATE: AUGUST 14, 1992
SUBJECT: ST. THOMAS BEcKET CHURCH TRAFFIC STUDY
LOCATED IN SE UART
Q ER OF SECTION 25
TH-3 BETWEEN DIFFLEY & CLIFF ROADS
SEH FILE NUMBER 89040-94
BACKGROUND
A new church is being proposed to be built immediately
adjacent to the west side of State Trunk Highway 3
approximately midway between Diffley Road (CSAH-30) and Cliff
Road (CSAH-32) (Exhibit I) . Besides having access to TH-3,
the site is to be connected to the local street system to the
west at Atlantic Hill Drive and to Tofte Lane to the north.
The church is to be built in two phases. Phase I would
comprise approximately 38,000 square feet and would provide
seating for 800 persons. Phase II would expand the size of
the facility to 48,900 square feet and would provide seating
for 1,200 persons.
Concerns have been expressed regarding potential traffic
impacts especially to the local streets in the area. This
study was commissioned to examine:
1. Evaluation of the adequacy of existing street
designs to handle the increases in traffic
2. Examination of any safety deficiencies due to the
increased traffic volumes
3. Comparison of the trip characteristics to an
alternative land use of single family residential
homes
•
scsreLom
HENDRIOCIDN 7 wricotagq
13([
R■97% 612 490 2150 08-14-92 10: 19AM P002 #07
08/14/92 10:20 FAX 612 490 2150 REST. PAUL +++ EAGAN 0003/010
TRIP GENERATION
The traffic volumes were estimated for various time periods
including the trips during an average weekday, an evening
weekday peak hour, an average Sunday and during an average
Sunday peak period.
The trip estimates were based on information provided by the
Institute of Transportation Engineering (ITE) in the 5th
Edition of the Trip Generation Manual and from special reports
presented in the monthly periodical from ITE called the ITE
Journal. These references provide trip rates for many types
of land uses including churches based on many national
studies. Trip rate estimates are provided for a number of
measures such as per 1,000 square feet, per member and per
family.
The following quantities were used in the calculations:
Interim Ultimate
Phase I Phase II
Overall Square Footage 38,040 48,900
Membership (persons) 4,050 6,220
•
Families in Parish 1,350 2,390
Using the ITE information, we would estimate that the site
trips would be:
TRIP SUMMARY
(Vehicles)
Interim Ultimate
Ave. Sunday: 1,000 - 1,400 1,600 - 2,000
Sun Peak Er: 350 - 500 600 - 800
Ave. Weekday: 400 - 700 500 - 1,000
Week PM Peak Er: 10 - 30 15 - 45
P
&-98% 612 490 2150 08-14-92 10: 19AM P003 #07
08/14/92 10:20 FAX 612 490 2150 SEE ST. PAUL 444 EAGAN 0004/010
•
The trip estimates were found to vary somewhat depending upon
which standard of measurement is used, which is why a range of
values is presented above. Additional information was
provided by the project architects regarding the individual
service times and expected participation levels of parish
families for Sunday services. This information was used to
roughly check the above trip estimates and was found. to be
within the stated ranges.
To ensure that our traffic analysis is conservative with some
factor of safety, all traffic analysis was based on the upper
ranges of the estimates.
•
TRIP DISTRIBUTION
Information was provided by the project architect concerning
the general locations of families currently in the parish.
Although the church is leasing space in the vicinity of Lone
oak Road and Lexington Avenue, most of the parish members live
in the southeastern area of Eagan.
Approximately 75 percent of the members live within 2.5 miles
of the proposed location on TH-3. Between 15 and 20 percent
of the members live within a mile of the site and about 5
percent have homes in the immediate area.
The relative closeness of the members locations means that for
some trips will be more convenient to use local residential •
streets rather than county roads or trunk highways to access
the new church. For example, members living in neighborhoods
southwest of Dodd Road would probably use Wilderness Run Road
and Atlantic Hill Drive to reach the site. Members living
immediately northwest of Dodd' Road could use Hackmore Drive to
Tofte Lane.
For the interim Phase I, it appears that approximately 21
percent of the trips would use local streets which lead to
Atlantic Hill Drive or Tofte Lane. The remaining 79 percent
of the trips would use the Trunk Highway 3 entrance.
The project architects projected future parish growth based on -
some of the changing demographics in Began, Inver Grove
Heights and Rosemount. In the future (10 years) Eagan is
expected to continue to be the primary place where parish
families live (74 percent) . Rosemount *is projected to be the
location of 20 percent of the parish families and Inver Grove
Heights will be home to 6 percent of the families.
- 3 -
V5Ce
A■98% 612 490 2150 08-14-92 10: 19AM P004 #07
08/14/92 10:21 FAX 612 490 2150 SE$ ST. PAUL ++4 EAGAN 0005/010
These future demographic and growth projections were used to
estimate the longer term distribution of trips to the site.
While some travel shifts will occur, overall the relative
distribution of trips to the site appears to be similar to
today. Approximately 80 percent of the trips would be
estimated to use TH-3, while 20 percent of the trips would
access the site via Atlantic Hill Drive or Tofte Lane.
TRAFFIC IMPACTS
Estimates of the total added traffic were then made using the
estimates for the vehicle trips and the travel distributions
discussed above. The most critical time period was the peak
hour during Sunday services. The traffic volumes were
tabulated to be:
SUNDAY PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOIDS
(in total vehicles)
Interim Ultimate
Location . Phase I Phase II
* Atlantic Hill Drive 88 112
* Tofte Lane 20 48
* Trunk Highway 3 395 640
500 800
From an overall daily traffic standpoint, the traffic volumes
added to Atlantic Hill Drive and Tofte Lane are relatively
small. The residential street designs can easily accommodate
these volumes. However, this increase will be very
perceptible to residents living on these streets since the
volumes tend to occur over the short period of 15 - 20 minutes
before service times.
There will be a concern regarding the speed of traffic.
Generally, this situation should not become a safety problem
since our studies show that typically, only a very small
percentage of vehicles exceed the speed limit. In addition,
the vehicle and pedestrian conflicts are minimized since the
morning church services occur before most outside residential
activity.
•
- 4 -
‘3 'A
R..98% 612 490 2150 08-14-92 10: 19AM P005 #07
mem
08/14/92 10:21 FAX 812 490 2150 SEE ST. PAUL 444 EAGAN 006/010
Multiple access points to the church are primarily desirable
in order to assist in dispersing the traffic after the
services and. If only one driveway was provided to Trunk
Highway 3, excessive delays would be incurred for church
members trying to leave after the service. The resulting
frustration usually leads drivers to taking chances on
entering the highway by accepting smaller traffic gaps than
normal, thus leading to "close calls" with the mainline TH-3
traffic.
Connections to the local street system does present a problem
in terms of a street's function. During the week, the local
streets tend to provide only residential access. On a Sunday,
the street's primary function becomes a collector of trips
destined to the church. This changing function can present a
difficulty leading to vehicle conflicts (driveway backing) and
the speed issue noted above.
MITIGATION
The mitigation of the potential future traffic impacts on
Atlantic Hill Drive will be difficult. Traffic controls and
other appurtenances are rarely successful in limiting speed
problems. The options which can have some effect relate to
street connections/orientation and policies regarding access.
The connections between the church parking areas to Atlantic
Hill Drive and Tofte Lane could be made less direct to the
church by either connecting the two streets and providing a
"Tee" to the church or by extending Atlantic Hill Drive to
Trunk Highway 3 and again providing a driveway Tee to the
church. The third option would be to eliminate the
connections altogether and allow only a single access to Trunk
Highway 3 for the church. All these options have trade-offs
which make them somewhat undesirable.
The elimination of all connections to the local street system
would put considerable pressure on members exiting the site to
TH-3. We do not currently have hourly traffic volumes for a
Sunday at this location, however the high speeds on TH-3 will
make it difficult for exiting traffic to find adequate gaps to
pull out onto the highway.
An option for providing multiple access points from the church •
to TH-3 has been recently raised with the Minnesota Department
of Transportation (Mn/DOT) . We would expect that any
approvals would be contingent upon providing the proper
spacing between the driveways. Generally, a 500 - 600 foot
interval would be desired. We are still currently. assessing
the feasibility as well as the operational and safety aspects
of this option.
- 5 -
)(r-22%
R-97% 612 490 2150 08-14-92 10: 19AM P006 #07
08/14/92 10:22 FAX 612 490 2150 SEE ST. PAUL 444 EAGAN a 007/010
COMPARISON TO RESIDENTIAL USES
Even if a church was not built, the site will be developed at
some point in the future. In an effort to compare the impacts
of other potential land uses, it was decided to examine the
traffic characteristics if the site was developed for single
family residential uses. City staff examined how a
development could be laid out to quantify the number of
dwelling units which could be built. It appears that the site
could accommodate approximately 27 single family lots.
This information was then used to estimate the trips which
would occur on an average weekday, a Saturday and during a
Sunday. The hourly traffic distribution of the existing
residential development along Atlantic Rill Drive was compared
to the total distribution with a church or with the site being
developed as single family residential. To be conservative,
it was assumed that all the residential traffic would use
Atlantic Hill Drive, even though a connection to Tofte Lane
and a possible future street connection to the south of the
property would most likely occur.
Exhibit II shows the comparison of the hourly traffic
distributions between the single family residential use and
the proposed church. During an average weekday a residential
development would add to the existing traffic pattern by
producing trips all day, every day. On the other hand, the
church would produce much smaller traffic volumes during the
week or on Saturday. It should be noted that operationally
the church has less impact since the trips to the church
rarely occur during the weekday morning or evening peak rush
hours. A church policy has been proposed which would keep the
driveway gates to Atlantic rill Drive and Tofte Lane closed
during the week, thus eliminating any additional daily
traffic.
The impact on Sunday travel patterns is readily apparent. The
concentration of trips from the church exceeds what would be
seen for a residential development, however the church would
still produce fewer total trips for the whole day. The
exhibit underscores the fact that many trips come from the
residential area itself, and that residential development
produces more trips over a longer period during a typical
weekday. ,
•
- 6
R=98% 612 490 2150 08-14-92 10: 19AM P007 #07
08/14/92 10:22 FAX 612 490 2150 SEE ST. PAUL 4-■1 EAGAN 0008/010
PARKING
Although this subject was not originally in our scope of
study, often the parking impacts can be as much of a concern
to local residents as the traffic issues are. After our very
preliminary review, we believe that the parking supply should
be examined further by City staff to verify that enough spaces
will be available.
Bagan's code requires 1 parking space per 3.5 seats or 229
spaces for the phase I development. Many typical city
ordinances we consulted used a lower figure requirement of 1
space per 3.0 seats. The parking generation was estimated
using the ITE parking generation manual which suggests a
parking rate of 0.36 spaces occupied per attendee. Given
maximum usage at 800 seats, 288 spaces would be required.
Often, there are after service activities which occur that
require the supply of parking to serve some overlapping
between services. If overflow should occur, there appears to
be just enough adequate width on the connecting entrances of
Atlantic Hill Drive and Tofte Lane that one sided parking
could be accommodated. We did not verify how many automobiles
could be parked in this manner.
City policy requires parking space sizes of 7.0 feet by 20
feet. Many city ordinances allow smaller space sizes. Space
sizes which approach 8 feet in width tend to be too tight,
forcing many parking vehicles to encroach on adjacent spaces.
Based on our observations of parking operations, we believe
that a 9 foot by 18 foot space size could adequately
accommodate most vehicles. A variance could be examined as
one means to modifying the layout to provide additional
spaces.
7 -
(LW
12■98% 612 490 2150 08-14-92 10: 19AM P008 #07
08/14/92 10:23 FAX 612 490 2150 SEH ST. PAUL 444 EAGAN 0 009/010
•
•
• • v
' . 4 .:‘‘•V
%'f/ ,' t . lit L _ . :1
MI "Ivri, .
1-9•.,
.. .
• .. .
. ..„. ,, • . . , , , ,,
4, , , „. T.,. .. . #.•.
. ._„/ , .e. \a ;11..
.4%."F (
me, ,, : .) 4 Il I 1 /,‘ 1.,. ...tec/.., l..::
,, : Aftoti • ar,41 ,
Lp . .....1,.: •,...........„ vr ;:..-7.,-.4,7,,-11,i, '
* . ' ,A. "lit iiiia-4....af, citi. . . .1 .../ .
01
pz.....iiikilt, y'." TI ( ' •
. Nfirici --;-i •
/ 4011r-
:s t
'"°. / 1././'.' 11111:: ::":L1S _i!
1 7�
:Iles
....., , . _______...... ,
�iii,......,....„ .a. ....S.
4
• ( ;
I • )i ! O rr'r
m 0 •
•
I' � • �,. 1 . .
: &.
r,.. _-- . ,
to ritii ! !..ki. o.) i / / ie. . Eli . : gi .4, .... .r- lin i
1,3'.
i- i I
11 ii. .11 • .
I s
PLAN---i ' SAINT THOMAS B ECK ET 111 `2_a 4-
t=:I1'ti rli� III II 1� 1P .n
I a • ,; EAGAN, MINNESOTA j i1�
. {_ ! �
Exhibit
R98% Ick. 612 490 2150 08-14-92 10: 19AM P009 #07
08/14/92 10:23 FAX 612 490 2150 SEE ST. PAUL 444 EAGAN W010/010
Comparison of Daily Traffic Patterns
Proposed Church and the Site as Single Family Residential
Hourly Traffic Patterns with St.Thomas Becket Cksreb
as•
«
.2 150
G
e+
A
110
M
ErtI .
1 1
im ii r II!. 'Y 1 I'h ri'II. III I I 1 I I ti II l 4: 1 ' II 11 1 1 I I 1, 1 1 X11 i._.._ ° � I.: �: ..i 11.�- I � 1 t.1 11 .
I WON I TUE I WED I THR I FRI I SAT I SUN I
Day of the Week
®Existin&Homes NMI Clairol'
Hourly Traffic Patterns—site as residential
210
i50
u
V
O
A
t 1 I :!ii _ I ,I it 111 ,1
0 ?0 ! n I I l HI,.
IY. 'li fL i t I I i i '' -I
1 1 [f _ ;II :+{ Ii I1 I -, 11. .I T II li: II1 1 11
it �I .I !ii : I ( I I II i ,I.� �II: I ,.I-1 1. - l fi, '1 n 1 :�k .
1 NON i . TUE I WED I THR 1 PRI 1 SAT I SUN I
Day of the Week
®Misting Homes New Single—Family Homes
_8 Exhibit II
}
�
R�96% ` 612 490 2150 08-14-92 10: 19AM P010 #07
Agenda Information Memo
August 18, 1992 City Council Meeting
' s_Jhl 1 I _ L_ ,11 'ME J : u 1 L!1 ul_ a LL:_ I
D. Planned Development Amendment, Jerald W. Peterson, Changing the Use from a
Medical Center/Office Building to a Motel on Lot 2, Block 2, Rahn Cliff 3rd Addition
Located Along Rahn Cliff Court in the NW 1/4 of Sec 32—At its meeting of July 28, 1992,
the Advisory Planning Commission considered the above-referenced planned development
amendment. The purpose of the application is to determine whether a three story motel
is an appropriate alternative to the medical clinic/office building contemplated in the
original PD agreement. If the amendment is approved, it will be necessary for the applicant
to plat the property to permit development under this amendment. For additional
information with respect to this application, please refe the Community Development
Department staff report which is enclosed on pages through/c-6 for your review.
.?Also enclosed on pages (57 through/c are the A og
sory Planning Commission minutes
relative to this item. The APC is recommending approval. Please notc,.the modification of
condition one as noted in the minutes. Also enclosed on pages(S-3 through is are .
copies of correspondence from a representative of First American Bank and area residents
opposing the proposed change.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny a planned develop-
ment amendment for Jerald W. Peterson, changing the use from a medical center/office
building to a motel on Lot 2, Block 2, Rahn Cliff 3rd Addition located along Rahn Cliff
Court in the NW 1/4 of Section 32 as presented.
f (-3
SUBJECT: PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AMENDMENT
(RAHNCLIFF PLANNED DEVELOPMENT)
APPLICANT: JERALD W PETERSON
LOCATION: LOT 2, BLOCK 2, RAHNCLIFF 3RD ADDITION
(NW 114 SECTION 32)
EXISTING ZONING: PD (PLANNED DEVELOPMENT)
DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: JULY 28, 1992
DATE OF REPORT: JULY 23, 1992
COMPILED BY: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
APPLICATION SUMMARY: An application has been submitted requesting a Planned
Development Amendment to change the approved use on Lot 2, Block 2, Rahncliff 3rd
Addition. This site is part of the approximate 17 acre Rahncliff Planned Development that
was approved in September 1988 for a mixture of commercial uses. The existing agreement
allows a 12,000 sq. ft. office or medical clinic to be built on the subject 1.8 acre lot. The
applicant is proposing a three-story 63-unit Super 8 motel.
COMMENTS: The site is located immediately south of Bakers Square abutting I-35E and
does not contain any significant vegetation. An overall landscaping plan was prepared with
the original Planned Development that the applicant has agreed td follow. This will provide
consistency along I-35E and throughout the Planned Development.
As proposed, the building and parking layout meet Code setback requirements. One
additional parking stall is necessary to meet Code requirements of one space for every
lodging room, plus one additional space for every eight rooms. A physical connection to the
Bakers Square parking lot and the lot to the southwest is necessary to allow cross parking
ingress/egress movements that were a condition of the Rahncliff 3rd Addition. The building
itself will be brick and stucco the same color as the Bakers Square building. No building-
mounted signage is shown on the submitted elevations. A condition of the original
agreements stated that all trash areas shall be contained within the buildings except for the •
fast food(Burger King)facility. Another one stated that rooftop mechanical equipment shall
not be visible from the adjacent roads or I-35E.
The applicant is proposing a pylon sign. The original approved sign plan and the 1989
amendment does not show a pylon sign on this lot. Therefore, if approved, an amendment
to the Planned Development Agreement shall be required. A ground sign was approved
along Rahncliff Court. Drawings were not submitted at the time of the application for the
pylon sign.
l
If approved, this Planned Development shall be subject to:
1. The color of the brick and stucco shall be the same as the Bakers Square
restaurant.
2. All signage shall conform to the Planned Development Agreement and Code
requirements.
3. If a pylon sign is approved, an amendment to the Planned Development
Agreement shall be required.
4. The parking lot shall be expanded to allow cross parking ingress/egress
movements. Easements shall be provided to the City prior to the Planned
Development Agreement ratification by the City Council.
5. The Planned Development overall landscaping plan shall be followed. All green
areas shall be irrigated.
6. A trash recycling area shall be contained in the building.
7. Rooftop mechanical equipment shall not be visible from adjacent roads or I-35E.
RAHNCLIFF PLANNED DEVELOPMENT
•
(Proposed Super 8 Motel) '
., .------CLIFF—R_4AD,_ .
y i ' r ' N i I it `� t ��` \cr rce /1 f // ,,...�..� AUTO MALL ,' n; B ' - IN(p" %'"peso/:, a. I \r �i. .. ( I ,�i ///,,// /
• l`__^ _ — - 3 ,.\ -'. —,.y'1''r' \/Z1. I ' //, �/ / '
., " `- ——-— 'r !`/ .•�'�• �• j I ; it • ', ! ■ ' ,'%/ i ,', /' // if
• '""fAHNCLIFF COURT- 1: — a /• J
• . i , r 1 //', l•1 NV
1J - �._ \. n /
y ri , ' \ \. `\- \°ri /.._�- H N , I l l l / %/l / / /'//-1 //�//•
i E_ BANK V \\/ i /, / /' r /' ff—_ /-L /•/�•/ /
1 I • 4 i A,,,,l; P f. . ' // i ird .,,/,' , i /
� - 6 �, I 7 1 1i , I
RIP /R1 11 //1/ 1 i/ f1////,71 ll / /'' //
I
•
1/(I,/, // 'I/ ,///' ///// d/
i el)\ .. - ' i / 0 e % .a.4 '' i ',.
/1 ..., ,/ / f �' ,./Y-/„.;.1.,
ARE' / / \ i / .
/ / / \//, �A✓ //�// '.Iil.v- -� sssas<.s��s1.t. s- - -'jam �%- ,/ .r� /' / 1 , /, / j f
i RNN11/1,.1 - - • ','•cJ ./ i • / / / / / / , ///
_ W _ _ �
/....02.y/f/ //doo:: /I cdf/it de,/:// 94/;....;.„;.." 41, .
-.//, ; t / .1/ 1 f' • 1'�/ /'// '/� %// i,,„',4,4'/ /, / / , •,9,,-\•111 , / l� f ' \ // / / / —•;,,., / t / 7�l"/1' - 1/ •ir, 'f / / / / / //W/ . / _ i�, /
yr. /'/- r ,
1[IL 8 =
' ' "4":///,',..,///::.;/
/♦ i `
/;// /\/ / '/ / /✓ / / ii .v /�1 Iil , =' 4011k /,,./ , ,r
1
1 O. O�
/ '\\ .' 1\
` 1\ /— - N, P /'/'j//, ••../// /// /' '///''/. //11 i n„ . / .•
PROPOSED SUPER 8 MOTEL
•
. 43'
4K,* 440 14;
-two CO- s,„
4
tat
4401,0
• 14 St b
40
'‘'%0 vv
° Nt*
sk'e . 0 0
IP
11111Love 00,..00
I(0
I6=f I
I.�. Ali.) 11
��j !'ilI!'
IMO r. a r- r 1•
. ..;�.E ,ipelt-- mil
c ,
�i: 1.1I .111, iii
• .:. i:. - .
r Z !1,11,11 I „,„„
AN= , „1 � ,�i�;111111f�l
-' l—_�j i l"I lil z
Q , O• , I . >. , :i. ..• /. . 11 W � jl)!iIIIF;
J 1...
�� 11 " I �� W Afil...... 11 ��_, W
\ r.,! ,t !ill . ..11 J
W
'11 `%lir ' 1111•
I,l rCI)
L1.1\ � . id! 0 ; W/ ! Z Ii
MI III MI'7 a li I `�
■ ))dill ' i IPi.iiiii'f i l I
/=_
; u 1 'f' III
. Wane 114 I ir11.1-
111'1 , 111111-
ow
1.•r..i !i!. !!Ii HUM'''.
l
'kali�1 „?ili
;.'!. Il
I.!11111.111MI.iiiillitil .
:m `. -i
,rI
■"■laws_.• 111 1
L--(.9
, I
0 ,�iE iJ I -1lr
1li , l 1!,!1II
1'ii I� I,I,IIIdI il►i!111�! ,i1I,I li'
1 1
0 • 0l:ii l II
iv� N. rlj it I,,
...t 0.1 t Ili:hl•. n,ll.li
ivii �i i f!i!l Iill11 I II'I,ill'
C", ,I,II�1i111,,111,!1,ill,Illll,iiiliv
0 ■ N' 1II1 v,IN
ii iiili s I li;i !i,
i il,,,III,.I„I,Iiit, !�;,;II ,Illlll
i '►!I;I!I�illiiu
I / ,; o ,�■ NoI■ M ,Il,lll
•
1 MI ll bi;,i sl ,cl•.
11,!,,.;,;.,,ll Ii..i;1 III.I • :"111,1111:!lll�li
O i
111 lilil9 PI 0 Li,II,1i I�I;
I
-- ii li Ilif!l Ijl � ill VIII II'I!I
III ill Ili' O 0 IN :� Img 11•11 ! ' i!' l I," O
�' � II�.I ii I��i
_____:. , ,i Illl��lllilll _ 1�1 it II _.
i Illlll III;: ,, II,,iii 1
/ I �Il1i;� II I; i' Q i I•I■ III Q
\\ - /A _ I �l NI
j - i
i
II
i
l
i l
\ �; ' W
,1!1;111'1 I,;;,
III1 ll1ll11l ►!I,I J W �I II, lI I
W
— I ,1 I J
.I
0 i li I■ .■ � II W
I 1l II,I
: 111111 1 Ii 11,1 I,'III I IMM
/ j, _ II'111 1'11� i 1l I
■� li
`\ � � ►I iIiI ■ ! ■ I '
I. l 'CC
7
o 0 I II � 'lI�I ll l,'i l =O l ve _•
jr,l l� IIllItII!Ilil! lI I!II! Ii I F— I;l,i l l I
1 -�i lllI -� -• 0- 1,
I 'l'l
Yi� I I 1 I ii
0 .jl ! VIIl, 1►, 1 , II
J 11,1 . , 11,i1 . . hill
I101iI1111it
i II igil!�l�r
!ii lit !.,1
Eno: ii
0 IENII.l1,
II►,'I 4 iiI
a .
0 �,
1 101,110.,!
Illi i i ii, il,
—j i i;. ,l;ljlllii
,, l .,
1 .I !i'; ?ie 1:
•1 *°C
l
I
,, ____
I ryt- - BIZIllfmrlifej
ra wia
IIIIIII
cc , PAII, Er . 111111101 Fr LT_
cc
d —1
U. r
0
-4 - --) -- - o
z
c4 ) ;
11 I 11%, 1 I AT- Ftl...I li
on. 1110A _ 1
MD:
;... IMP gel 1111Mili 1
mg
iko, .0-111 11
, :)--
1
1
11 ,,
.,
i IriA.
1-
NEIL I 1....1111111 i ,,_.• iiii, _ 1
la irmtwo 141mi
1 i i,, !
1 1 ..
41
I I
i • - i
.....--_
I r, Ili 1
)
1 1
.
I II I 1•11111.161.6 j.. li._
!:.:., vi, I Ti 191 " 1
, . 1
I
.. .1 -
)
11:1 lb
or smi
IT
1
41\110) It
0
)
1■1 Zia"
Id Mk 1
. 4
IMV-I 41111111*r
j
i_AR i i _ itzl i :iir-
1
rm ivir. D gas
. :I! IA
r
3 t
.
•
ri 11 I e -iiii, (01
.J -
L ...„,A is; app,,L_J i
U iir, oak
1 Awning
L___ _
ir or. =HIER
IlliiIII _ ___ I.
0 I ST)
.1
Page 15/EAGAN ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES.
JULY 28, 1992. .
JERALD W. PETERSON
PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AMENDMENT
Chairman Voracek opened the next public hearing of the evening
regarding a Planned Development Amendment changing the use from a
medical center/office building to a motel on Lot 2, Block 2, Rahn
Cliff 3rd Addition located along Rahn Cliff Court in the NW 1/4 of
Section 32.
City Planner Sturm stated that the planned development agreement
currently allows an office or medical clinic to be built on this
site. The applicant is proposing a Super 8 motel be built instead.
The landscaping plan submitted with the original planned development
will be followed. The applicant is proposing a pylon sign which was
not originally in the planned development agreement. All City setback
and parking requirements are satisfied with this. application.
Marie Bakke, a representative of the applicant, stated that
Baker's Square approves of this application. She mentioned that an
Eagan-based lender will be used to finance this project.
Mike Haverkamp, a representative of 1st American Bank, stated
that this application is not compatible with the existing area. He
stated that 1st American Bank is not opposed to hotels/motels,
however, it is not what they expected would be built on this site.
1st American Bank is opposed to this application.
Dale Klausner, a resident of Pin Oak Drive, felt that this
application is not a benefit to the neighboring residents. He
mentioned that he was also speaking for his neighbor, Deneen LaRue,
who felt that a hotel will not enhance or improve the area.
Kelly Norun stated that he was neutral on this application,
however, he requested that the City enforce weed control on adjoining
property in this area.
Member Graves stated that he had no problem approving this
application.
Member Hoeft suggested that before the City Council meeting, that
the applicant have an artist's drawing of the exterior of the
building prepared.
Member Merkley requested that condition 11 be amended to include
all four sides of the building.
Mr. Klausner mentioned that this application will bring more
transient traffic into the area and again stated that a hotel does
not belong in this area.
Page 16/EAGAN ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
JULY 28, 1992
Member Hunter mentioned that there was no concrete reasons for
denial.
Hunter moved, Hoeft seconded, a motion to approve ,a Planned
Development Amendment changing the use from a medical center/office
building to a motel on Lot 2, Block 2, Rahn Cliff 3rd Addition
located along Rahn Cliff Court in the NW 1/4 of Section 32, subject
to the following conditions:
1. The color of the brick and stucco on all four sides of the
building shall be the same as the Bakers Square restaurant.
2. All signage shall conform to the Planned Development
Agreement and Code requirements.
3. If a pylon sign is approved, an amendment to the Planned
Development Agreement shall be required.
4. The parking lot shall be expanded to allow cross parking
ingress/egress movements. Easements shall be provided to the
City prior to the Planned Development Agreement ratification
by the City Council.
5. The Planned Development overall landscaping plan shall be
followed. All green areas shall be irrigated.
6. A trash recycling area shall be contained in the building.
7. Rooftop mechanical equipment shall not be visible from
adjacent roads or I-35E.
All present voted in favor.
•
Ca‘
lirja First American Bank
Metro
Member Bremer Financial Corporation
Eagan Inver Grove Heights Roseville South St.Paul
1995 RahnCliff Court 6800 Cahill Avenue East 1715 W.County Road B2 633 So.Concord Street
Eagan,MN 55122-3371 Inver Grove Heights,MN 55076-2029 Roseville,MN 55113-3087 South St.Paul,MN 55075-2434
(612)452.2265 (612)451-8581 (612)633-4097 (612)451-6822
FAX(612)452-2265 FAX(612)451-8581 FAX(612)636.9203 FAX(612)457-9093
July 30,1992
The Honorable Mayor and City Council
City of Eagan
3830 Pilot Knob Road
Eagan, MN 55122-1897
RE: Advisory Planning Commission Approval on July 28,1992 of the Planned
Development Amendment Changing the Use from a Medical Center/Professional
Office Building to a Motel on Lot 2, Block 2 RahnCliff Third Addition
Located Along RahnCliff Court in the Northwest 1/4 of Section 32
Dear Honorable Mayor and City Council:
On Tuesday, July 28, 1992, I appeared before the Advisory Planning Commission as
a representative of First American Bank Metro located at 1995 RahnCliff Court,
Eagan, Minnesota. The purpose of our appearance was to voice our opposition to
the Planned Development Amendment ("RahnCliff Court Amendment") changing the use
from a medical center/professional office building to a motel on Lot 2, Block 2,
RahnCliff Third Addition located along RahnCliff Court in the Northwest 1/4 of
Section 32.
We are extremely disappointed that the Advisory Planning Commission unanimously
approved the RahnCliff Court Amendment with little debate and discussion -
regarding the opposition issues brought before them at this meeting. For your
information, this particular planning meeting was rather lengthy as the RahnCliff
Court Amendment agenda item was not heard until approximately 10:30 p.m. just
after a 21-hour discussion and controversial debate on the St. Thomas Becket
Addition - Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment. It is our understanding that some
members of the public opposed to the RahnCliff Court Amendment had to leave due
to time delays this discussion caused.
We respectfully request that the City Council further investigate the basis on
which the Advisory Planning Commission approved the RahnCliff Court Planned
Development Amendment for use as a motel and the Council take action at its
scheduled meeting date of August 18, 1992 to deny the request for approval of
this amendment. We are requesting this action for several reasons. First, First
American Bank Metro has been in business for over 80 years and is well
established in St. Paul and surrounding suburbs as a financial institution with a
strong reputation and image for financial stability and active community
involvement through our holding company and its major shareholder, the Otto
Bremer Foundation. Our basis for constructing the type of building at 1995
RahnCliff Court in 1989 was to portray an image of strength, quality, and
stability. We believe this was accomplished very adequately with the current
building at this location. This objective was also very costly as the building
costs exceeded $1 million or approximately $100 per square foot. The financial
Honorable Mayor and City Council
July 30, 1992
Page two
commitment to this type of facility was based on the Planned Development Use
approval of the project in 1988 which provided for retail and professional
buildings. At that time, we worked with the developer to assure that the Planned
Development Use provided for a quality facility to be built on the property
currently in question. We moved ahead with our building once we were assured
that the property in question was approved for medical/professional office
building use. In addition, we have written agreements with the developer
prohibiting them from building any two-story or higher facilities that block our
building view from the Interstate 35E freeway.
Based on the information presented at the Advisory Planning Commission hearing on
July 28, the proposal is to build a budget motel which is three stories high and
of quality far inferior to our bank building or a medical/professional office
building. The proposed budget motel is primarily stucco with some brick and a
shingled-type roof costing significantly less than a medical/professional office
building on a per square foot basis. It is our opinion that this amendment for a
budget motel does not meet the test of equal quality or better than the original
Planned Development Use of this property as a medical center/professional office
building. If this proposed facility is built at this location, it will seriously
impact the value and image of our building and business. This will also be in
direct conflict with our original objective to portray an image of strength,
quality, and stability. In addition, we do not feel the City has thoroughly
assessed if this facility is equal to or better than the original Planned
Development Use for this property. We believe the City has an obligation to the
existing businesses and residents in the community to deny the RahnCliff Court
Amendment as currently proposed.
If a Planned Development Amendment for a motel/hotel is considered for this
property, we believe it must ensure that the quality of the facility is
commensurate to the original Planned Development Use of the property as a
medical/professional office building. We believe the facility must be all brick
and with a flat roof if the building is to be multi-level. In addition, the
business use and image must be commensurate to the original intent of the Planned
Development Use. We seriously question whether a budget motel which primarily
caters to the traveling public and does not provide meeting/banquet rooms or
restaurant facilities to the local community is equal to or better than a medical
center/professional building use.
We want to thank you for your serious consideration of our opposition to the
RahnCliff Court Amendment. We, again, respectively request that you deny
approval of the RahnCliff Court Planned Development Amendment as proposed for a
budget motel or any other amendment to this Planned Development Use unless the
project is deemed equal to or better than the original Planned Development Use as
a medical/professional office building. We are available at any time to provide
you with any further information you may need or additional input you deem
necessary.
Yours truly,
7/ i
Michael D. H erkamp
Executive Vice President
MDH/rd
fr-
f57(
August 6, 1992
Mayor and City Council Members
Eagan City Hall
3830 Pilot Knob Road •
Eagan, MN 55122
Dear Mayor and City Council Members:
1 am writing in regard to the proposed PD(planned development) amendment at
Rahncliff development. The developer is asking you to change the approved use from an
office/medical building to a use that would allow a Super 8 Motel.
I feel a low budget motel would not be appropriate at this location. The Rahncliff
development is a neighborhood shopping center. A motel of this type would not benefit the
neighborhood, and would only serve to a transit clientele.
The Super 8 Motel at this location would change the direction of future development in
this area. I feel the change would be away from a neighborhood shopping center.
The developer has not demonstrated how the motel. at this site, would be better for the
neighborhood, than if the land were to be developed with its present approved use (office or
medical building). The PD amendment would only benefit the developer, at the expense of the
surrounding neighborhood.
Sincerely. •
Dale Klossner
2025 Pin Oak Drive
Eagan, MN 55122
•
• 1 ■C
August 10, 1992
The Honorable Mayor and.City Council,
RE: Advisory Planning Commission Approval on July 28,1992 of the Planned
Development Amendment changing the use from Medical Center/ Professional
Office Building to a Motel on lot 2, Block 2 RahnCliff Third Addition.
Dear Honorable Mayor and City Council,
We attended last months Planning Commission meeting , but due to the lengthy
agenda, time constraints didn't allow us to stay and speak before the
Canmission. We are writing to oppose the Planning Commission's decision to
approve an ameendment in an existing Planned Development allowing Super 8 Motel
to build in place of an office/ medical building.
Under the Planned Development as it exists, we were led to believe this
property would be developed soley as a medical/ office building, thus
providing a buffer between cur neighborhood and the retail strip mall
already existing at Rahn Cliff Crossings. If our City Council amends
a Planned Development, we would hope it would be for the betterment of
the entire area. Since the Super 8 Motel would lie just one lot away
from our residential neighborhood and Kettle Park, we feel the motel, with
its 24 hour activity and transient clientele would not be appropriate
for this particular site. It does not mesh with the Planned Development
already in place. A motel of this nature would completely change the direction
and scope of this neighborhood development.
Our neighborhood has already endured surrounding rezoning to higher density
development in the recent past. We are trying to establish a relationship
between responsible development and our neighborhood. We urge our Eagan
City Council not to approve this planned Development amenndment.
Thank you,
Sincerely,
Denine Leroux
qt!:!::17� •
Joan Copsey
Denine Leroux Dennis and Joan
CoP• -Y
2023 Pin Oak Dr. 2021 Pin Oak Dr.
Eagan, MN 55122 Eagan, MN 55122
454-2900 688-0636
DKL
(CCe
F.-
, AUG I i .
August 12, 1992
!1j
Mayor Thomas Egan
3830 Pilot Knob Road
Eagan MN 55122
Dear Mayor Egan:
I am writing as a concerned resident. This is not a normal
occurrance for me, but when I learned that you were considering
rezoning part of my neighborhood for a Super 8 Motel I simply was
beside myself .
I don' t know if you are considering all the impact that a Motel
in this location could have. The area of Rahncliff where you are
considering building this Motel is a residential areas with lots
of children and an elementary school less than a mile away. In
light of the alarming number of abducted children alone I hope
you will reconsider!
Another factor to consider is that the value of the homes in this
area will considerably decrease. Also who would want to live in
this neighborhood where children would most certainly be at a
higher risk. Would you put your own children in this position? I
sincerely doubt that you would be thrilled to live in this
situation.
I realize that Eagan needs to have more businesses to contribute
to the tax base, but I don' t believe this is the place for such
types of business.
Please consider my letter as a proxy vote against this rezoning
when you consider this issue on August 18th, as I will be out of
state. I simply had to make my concerns heard dispite my planned
vacation.
Sin erely, i
Mrs. Linda Christiansen
Concered Mother and Eagan Resident
2014 Vienna Lane
Eagan MN 55122 ,
cc: Eagan City Coucil Members
'l 77
Agenda Information Memo
August 18, 1992 City Council Meeting
PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AMENDMENT/CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS
CHILI'S RESTAURANT
E. Planned Development Amendment,Brinker International,Changing the Use from Retail
to a Class I (Sit Down) Restaurant and Conditional Use Permits to Allow On-Sale Liquor,
3.2 Beer or Wine, and a Pylon Sign on Lot 2, Block 1, Duckwood Crossings, Located Along
the West Side of Pilot Knob Road in the SE 1/4 of Sec 16—At its meeting of July 28, 1992,
the Advisory Planning Commission considered the above-referenced applications relative
to the development of a Chili's Restaurant south of the Holiday Station on Pilot Knob Road
in the Duckwood Crossings PD. For additional information with respect to this item,please
refer to the Community Development Department staff report which is enclosed on pages
through /77for your review. Also enclosed on pages /72-through /73 are the
Advisory Planning Commission minutes elative to this item. The APC is recommending
approval. Also enclosed on page r is a supplemental memo from the Community
Development Department relative to the remaining issues being discussed with the
applicant.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny 1) a planned
development amendment for Brinker International changing the use from retail to a Class
I (sit down) restaurant, 2) a conditional use permit to allow on-sale liquor, 3) a conditional
use permit to allow 3.2 beer or wine and 4) a conditional use permit for a pylon sign on Lot
2, Block 1, Duckwood Crossings located on the west side of Pilot Knob Road at Crestridge
Lane as presented.
L
SUBJECT: PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AMENDMENT
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
APPLICANT: BRINKER INTERNATIONAL
LOCATION: LOT 2, BLOCK 1, DUCKWOOD CROSSINGS
EXISTING ZONING: PD (PLANNED DEVELOPMENT)•
•
DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: JULY 28, 1992
DATE OF REPORT: JULY 17, 1992
COMPILED BY: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
APPLICATION SUMMARY: Separate applications have been submitted requesting a
Planned Development Amendment to allow a Class I restaurant on Lot 2, Block 1,
Duckwood Crossings, and a Conditional Use Permit for a pylon sign.
LOCATION: Lot 2, Block 1, Duckwood Crossings is located along the west side of Pilot
Knob Road south of the Holiday Station Store. Currently, the surrounding zoning districts
are all commercial-type planned developments.
BACKGROUND: Originally this lot was part of the Pondview Planned Development
approved July 1988 which allowed modified General Business district uses. Among those
uses listed were Class I restaurant facilities or food sales and retail sales of liquor and 3.2
beer or wine as part of any facility. The Pondview Planned Development was amended
when the Duckwood Crossings plat was platted in October 1989. At that time, the.plat was
for the development of a convenience gas station on Lot 1, Block 1, retail strip center on
Lot 2, Block 1, and a Class I restaurant on Lot 1, Block 2.
COMMENTS: The purpose for the Planned Development Amendment is to allow a Class
I restaurant seating 217 on Lot 2, Block 1, instead of the retail strip center. Brinker
International is proposing a 5,693 square foot Chili's restaurant with 142 parking spaces. As
proposed,the restaurant layout meets or exceeds all setback,lot coverage,and parking space
requirements.
In addition to the P.D. Amendment, the applicant has submitted a Conditional Use Permit
application for a pylon sign. The proposed sign will meet both size and height requirements
of 125 sq. ft. and maximum 27' in height. The sign will be internally lighted, displaying
Chili's logo. The proposal shows the sign located in the southeast corner of the site. As .
shown, the pylon meets both setback and distance requirements.
•
/S /
The applicant is requesting a Conditional Use Permit for on-sale liquor. City code requires
a Conditional Use Permit for any retail sale of liquor, 3.2 beer or wine as part of any facility.
The applicant is in the process of obtaining the necessary liquor license from the City.
The brick building will be very similar to the one along County Road 42 in Burnsville. The
proposed brick is Desert Loam in color and green and hot pink awnings, lights, and signage
add accent colors. An overall landscape plan was prepared for all three lots when the
Planned Development was originally approved. Chili's representatives have agreed to use
that plan that demonstrates a nice blend of overstory/understory and coniferous plant
material.
GRADING/DRAINAGE/EROSION CONTROL: The site was graded by the Duckwood
Crossing developer in 1989. The proposed parking lot for the restaurant will closely match
the existing grades. The drainage from this site will be directed to the existing storm sewer
system in Crestridge Drive which outlets to the south to Pond JP-3.
UTILITIES: Sanitary sewer service is readily available to serve the site from an existing 8"
line that runs along the north and east property line. The existing 8" line has sufficient
depth and capacity to serve the proposed development. The sanitary sewer service from the
building shall include a manhole at the property line to allow the City maintenance crews
access to the sewer service.
Watermain service with sufficient size and pressure is available from an existing 6" line in
Crestridge Drive. The development proposes to connect to the existing 6" line in the street
and extend a new 6" line to the building.
STREETS/ACCESS/CIRCULATION: The site plan for the restaurant proposes two
driveway openings onto Crestridge Drive, and no driveways connecting to Pilot Knob Road.
The City plans to finish the construction of the remaining 700 feet of Crestridge Drive from
Pilot Knob Road to the west and then north to the existing street by the Holiday Station
Store.
This development should coordinate with the Holiday Station Store the construction of the
south curb line of the existing concrete parking lot of the Holiday Store. The new curb will
convey drainage from the existing parking lot to the storm sewer system and prevent erosion
along the north property line of the restaurant site. The curb along the south edge of the
Holiday parking lot has not been built yet because the parking lot was planned to extend
to the south with the next development.
The site plan for the restaurant shall include concrete aprons at the driveway openings.
JASEMENTS/RIGHT-OF-WAY/PERMITS: The plat for Duckwood Crossings includes .
sufficient easements and right-of-way for the construction.of streets and utilities to serve this
development.
/Go
l
FINANCIAL OBLIGATION - 16-CU-19-6.92, Lot 2, Block 1, Duckwood Crossings
Based upon the study of the financial obligations collected in the past and the uses proposed
for the property, the following charges are proposed. The charges are computed using the
City's existing fee schedule and connections proposed to be made to the City's utility system
based on the submitted plans.
Improvement Use Rate Quantity Amount
None
(,(0
If approved, the Planned Development Amendment shall be subject to the following
conditions:
1. A Planned Development Agreement Amendment shall be executed.
2. The trash/recycling containers shall be in an enclosure made of the same materials
and also attached to the building.
3. All liquor license provisions shall be adhered to.
4. A one-time sign fee shall be required for all signs and .all Signage Code
requirements shall be adhered to.
5. No rooftop mechanical equipment shall be visible from Pilot Knob Road.
6. The landscape plan shall conform to the overall Planned Development landscape
plan. Berming along all parking areas shall be provided and irrigation shall be
required in all green areas.
7. No outdoor storage other than the trash recycling area shall be allowed.
8. All applicable Code requirements.
If approved, the Conditional Use Permits shall:
1. run with the land and be recorded with Dakota County within 60 days of Council
action with documentation provided to the City.
•
La
• Brinker Int'l PD Amendment & C.U.P. Pylon
,-,FIF ----f--A ----T-- i.
1-.) . e 1 14),....,„'Ii) ,,/ 41,j,i4,_.
)
", //
STREET MAP 'Y ..;11-Ai'jr:ell--i ' (c,.., '/ /
',.4,4“r! # . .s IIF . I i,
: 1 .."--91, ',-
- '
,I .., •“ 43, moo III:4
cf 'i, // • (oc"w04 UM i -../
) 1 o lcIal 1,7• . r ,:‘" 1
,- .erf,It r,/.' I 101.,4m-4 ■4
!, 12
1
L- a
.,,
..5/ i', ,i..7,* , I ..' .15 t=iLjri 4s r,t, /. : .- 1 ' __. F. .-:0,.,.-..,,,
• L.4,,1 e,./ • rtir.I.Ehl_ Fl hi 4 1 ,
fr" .. 77.Al, n ., -, -.--i-L.,,L
ii.. •.*. I WIT'1 ' ilid 6_,4011, 1 ,::+r
.,„, ( ., I MT ra—x- k , ', c!.1,,, ,,
...,,
4 ...,.. - ; ,-'11 e 1 . I '
.., !:
,1 ..,V.%1.:. ,1141.1-1.1t1°"4"
. .
fdl L 1
,(
,`7,..;n1m,•t+) , ''' - 'i---1 ,
e:.',..4.e,;•_ ii14
ZONING MAP ) ... t r !•,.0 t, ! 1 ' 1/ .!,,,. k,v,,, •
:1 :-. 'eirgLiirlitil -:',` r's1S1 I .i ? I
1 i i . ' .1.,-:-44: ■:.72,,.:i tli ::‘,I,F,Ii,-CI(
, in gm t. , A':
., RL.:
I, 1, : s At _ 61;11 fli::\•-::1117-ti.L7.‘.f
, ____LI.,_ i IFill- I :! ''...,...,i _L.,:...4' •
...)
-,s--3:,`.{...■ , ` lib' K
f.1; ;1____....L A •
•:'.14,.5". ,i ., q p :i16,_, .,,.?.1--- "1",--
f------,
..
ID
-''--''----•---N A_'
. D
‘ k/. I ,,.,;;'.
I ./
,7i,;'•,.-
L.-
. --• , Or
COMP GUIDE PLAN MAP I 11 1
•--.77.7.
Pt). .
,.. ' 4 ((i 1,41 \\
1.
- , i k‘i
. .....- D41
.....„
,.....
PF
.._ ./.,1,..‘„,......4 6;r)
.tk
. 1(03
- ..
11 I I 1
II ,
i a I!
e; 1
It
3 . •- 3 1
o ; z r , fl
I I.] 1! I cr 1 .it 1
1 1
o t
, . i.
:2, I -:1- :2 i l• 1 ;I .1i1 1 ' ' i I I II ii,
• .: .1 II in
1
I I!
1 Is ;I ii II : II I i, i 1 i • 1 =
1 0.4 I; 1 -4.. A 4 ,I i r I II r —a •
i J r... 1 1/
I : p
1 I:112 11. s : zi lit! ill 2 Si
s •I*1 I S. II I I
lil I 1 ?Ti
,...(r) ; ; ..t; li 1 771 11 iiii :1 3 .—....
V.) I 1.7)1 II 1 A tji 4.I Id 1.111 S l• I I
1 I 0
! 4; i ph. I 1 1 II. I I Ii.
1 gl;i/ IS I 1 ij (14) %II
ii 2 I li Pill' i
"I I IT 1 1
i1
1 1 71 ii i 1 0 =1.
i -
I, 11 le t 1
li I 1 li
I Mil 11 i I,,, r! .1-a if .--. i 1 1
- 1,1 1 i I
1-.; - 15:
11 til i
1 111
1 l• 1
\.) i 11;11- 1 3 I j.; 11 ;g I V 1 1
1
.1; 14 11 1 l•60 11
I I
i II 1-
1 al 1 I 1
li rill;! 0 ' 14
hi 11
li li
I: li'I.j. l'ii III rat i
I
I- li
l
1i
. 1
lii /3 1
I 11
.
1. !VIII! III 1 '1 II
1 -ii;!! '13 1! .:1
-- I 1 E;
la • ; ai
ll ii: ' 1 II 1
I
1 la
ililli P I 11 ...:.1
III 11 I I I-
•.,..), I: -•• .- li
I 1 I. :t •I,
lei Is
t 1 el
i
I••-..) li ii: 2 I il 3"
-1 2 ii I
g 3 1 'at - g
--- 6:7,,,,
e2
I 1I ik
III 1
' 2i'
ti t.I. t il LH--- !----i 1
....,......... 1 1 I 1 ',.
— I i • 11 :‘: . - k• t t, '''' • 4.1% : g
1 ji ti2 h I ';! tu 1 li . .s'L i
,.. .1 ,
li . ig • I
1 Cr 1
• I ' I
-- ------1-«-::;7,,......•—••••, Ti ' I
,.1 1-.,1 •tli, : .. 2: P-4 •'./A'A ' -•• 4- "
—-- T T:-7 7-- .7.--7-A , 4 , .r 7., A/ 0 / 1 ei 3-72-7--- --------'
. . .tr • r-a . A r..e• r.,...1,,Nelt,:.: A....In...a.: mess,,r __..--•:4.-.1..
..„,
-'—. 1._
I A 1 i A r ..., ,........•
,'I - ,--<.1
• „v p [ I
_
.. . ...., . N .., 0 : . t. N--• I el' 't
•-• 1
I :' i I — ‘-- al t/I ' II 1 - • . : *'
0 * I - 1 0
L.) 0
0 .2 ...,
k
14 gi
/ 1
I I
I . I —.1 X f 7 1 ,..I I",• i ,.:;
--i .
..f J L.: / I
P,ZA
\ I-fr t: •
••00I 12 ./.' • ,ii • ra i
I 2 .:,...-.: ; -. -• - -I- .PI—s71-tbio- .9eteisse —• •i k I .
' • ti - a
it . .
1 .It It /3
tt
. r 'a.- ■ a
::,, • .7 li'
\4,4 1._) I
Ut1
.,, ..,
j!,.•-r'r
. ...,..
i:•:,;:74.1-, .'"'"'"'
....,........ •
F61 '1
...- 11SIED14111 W""Vi
• 7.7.• I 1'03A130321
liF1
„..
Fli!.
n
i
••t
. -
. _
. .
•' .91711C? .. 'i. .
...
I .7,
'
I 1 * 1 1 1 -l'i i„ 1
11 1111111 Lli T7 .
I I 1
I kl
-F, - --9--, -- 7-:• -.-;- ---t----------;--0 '—, --,,
I i
I - ---
1 I
I - 1
I t ) I 1 I / 1.--....1.. .
--
i 1 (I I 1 I
41 %
. , (.1
S. 11 r 11
. , l., t.
° 14
'' • - '
.• , 1 ..' • I .t...
I .7-.....
!I 1 1 •
,
1 ... . T. i ____r 4.
..J.) ..1
)J. i' • j J.
_...._ [ [
I * 1
r 1 7,-:----,--17i-"' 7=.1-V!, .T 0
1 L ____ 1
1 1 1
. 1 ,- , • i It. ii , , i , I I 1 0
I ; ! 7 I 7 1 CC
' . ' 1 .!
I 1
CD
• -I : 1. . ' •7 I -1 ;''' :317 0
., .':-
IL 1 I I-
1
I ,
0
0 , 3 IA
r -.:-!'7.' FT-7=.7;--...-- T :7-77'7. ,..
0.
Li ,...ri' ,r I, , : ,.. _ ; 7 tf; i . :1
CD I ;7 • ' . : . .1[7 3:.3 •
0 1 * '!' - 1 ...- .1 •.. . - .7.-!.1 ' * , (71
CC I . I...-J
' --.' '-'".. ....---'."":---t- 71. ' *
7-, I
g 0
(-• *: Z
I- i : •
LO i k -
5
w
cc 1
,
o . •
-- i it
I .
.
• P' ' '
, .
•
. •i9 •
I i • 0,1 • ' -' ; '
I / • <
o-
w _1 -
i I I 1 L_Ji 1 1 1(.1 ... ' • >- D.b
W i
i I 1
1 II SCQICDM
le). . . ?.:
. ..
717.7
. .
- ..171-21wWP••••••••••NNIVIt. -••••••■••••••••••••••■•••••••••••••••••••••••••■••■• •••••"
C
11 11 # WI it '1 ' 111 1 111:#' 1, 11 1 1 1,1 t1111 i II 1 1 _ 3 U s
ill ' [IjlE 1, 11 � 'iifl1j111itfl, t ' } 1 1 1 llE1 ` ! # y11 }I1! 1 111111 I'11E 1 1g'1 i 11 �if �.1 11 1: i11 1 111'1 111 1 1'1 11 E 11' #1 1.1 1 ! i• 1 . 1t11 t {tt( {� #. !'') ; 11•) 1 1IJ1 1 1 ; t ! 111 1 111 (111{ 1 11 li !''. i1 i, 1 111 1� - ' -1N 1114. 1� 111J .t ' 1 ' >8
({111 i1. 111! WI 11 l'11-1. 1.1111i ''11111 1 111 ."11'1'1 11$ 111111'1 {11111111 III I�1 _ � t =g: .; Ill ; .�•
1111 I1l1 '11 flit /11.111 'Lll ti11111111111)1111 =1111;.1111111111 11 /. J 111 t t A W . ! .� ip _—�
_ • f
• . .f i i f i L1Y zz
# ss r�; a ..- o- [,
#1 :! i#. y a a 11
N • �: �aJ "s> v
/l •1 . i€.. W UJ
..e... _. ---;‘11:1
L)
LP
r.
4!.• mot,. Q.
r` •+ _ter' I: a/
is
1 \ei
r � � '.� a 3I` st — \ x^ Lii ; '
/ — Wit' ..�� ;�� �8i 111.11 1. a
r.. iii:.....1 4�•nR s• i 1 €iiii
��- �- • .' \-��(�,M) !mil. / �•_ - -
1s€{� 1 ((tea I �1� ° ;1
.11
� Iii II • 4_ ' #
r N `,1i! a
.• t
a ., M
I 1r
I a,�,
7 ,f s � o r.
(i, .� i .. Z re,
-f.I \I lib Ill- L.: ma ,
_
iir1. . i 771( ' .or----i11111
1 1 -. El • ,, -
.
\ ...� J/ 2 l e ' 14,_ —
Iiiri , i ul: i 1441 I
/ ■ ..,r ' "•
�€1„ , 1 I r ♦ /a= -� 11,,,,‘. ,, ,Ii_.. ..-. i • - -/ f.a� _1/111, 'A''"--.61.oe at iiimmitii ..., _�
W.
I-2 ' 1 N elk,XV4 I. k A ks,.– _,w, _.
\ ' 41111111%%0E,MMII■ ■M11131191•■ 1 II ‘i
:4 L \.::4,.._:-- -- ” AI — �
' �
111 2.� 1-- \\� \ NW, .., ' a
bC ' rr•
6 \ \ ,t 4,0-, _ ( 1 t.$ ., r,
v1
e^
0 el
eY; I° • n�I'I��1f IInpI�'''m''Iyry1��,� I��{�I�I��q1�u1�I�I�f�I'mmf = v
el I,. A- illiIt1I1W11�11WiNY RI W '
�i
isl i. I .e-i ��6r Ill(:IijI I I!I I II 125- = 'li II 1 I 1 1111 FLI
III Ilillll'i I �.- - 3p� p � 1 �� W
�1i �jr 'j 1' � LU../E_____I 1 u
H
IIli_ ll:Ir ! i
t I I l `I —� mI
pu ImmI®( @0
I li,iiii ip l IIF 151 hill 1111111111
i I'q ' , .
I Il :I[
!IIII llll,Ii': - �i.li
III _�_ I
I
;L; ,
1
111:!:1:!,'!:'1!:. --- ! I
I
s 1
ll I� t - I I I =•i_
L 1II; II! IIII
ell n
' — ...�
,11.;;j:' _I I!IMiuuounmm anlmnm m
h a 1
' l ill .U1
III I- I
1.::,,!';::i!.:4 ;II ,hI111!Iln I.1 I,
ht....
ii
0
I I'I I I — I I
rl.-
I I I-1 Gum - 1 I III�nmmmnmmmummnnlnmm l
11 I III ,,.,, II! I IIII I ' mmoumnmm
I_ I I 7 I .i I III I,II
!I_ _ - IIiI' 111111•
' L® I =>��mumm.uuuwunmuumso.1
II
I IA III 1��_r,III ill I ('III
II! ; 1 Illy___ ■�
J - ........ Iil 1 IIi I 1 1 1_ 1 ��
1 ,IIIIIIIIIIII!II llllil�Illlill I Its N IIII,,,.....EN_
I , �J� I® 1111111111 1,1`. IIIIIIIIIIi ii 1 I -
li6 I E L.P � III !� II'1.�.illNo
I! 111 11!,::,i;!.;.11'..11 II 1 Ilj I 11111 II III i I IiI a�
`r Miller i I' DI�IIiEI I I III(II II��III11I
It ul :>•�����I I � w Iii •:ate co N.
14 11 11 I . 1 1 I'I I I' Ili li'i, Q :�_ ) III �G.� zE
ov,tiI h =VIII IIIi11M',,b„, III,,,,I J 1Y1' Ip�IIIIIIIIIIIHINII ��tim
I III I— UIi.. I 1, mw Ills J - u�011 =�:M� U
III I $ I I Le=�
,11 z a�
sib - - ii I I��I I =_>•�.
IIV,IIII ��, Z III 11111111 V !i11III IIIIII`�I_�IIIMil1111111 Z
i I Ili t e °Z1
I�I 1 Z — III 11 _-- O
,l o:,., STI ¢ !I'I III'! 1. 1. 1 11_ =min. Q
• II IIII I{I'a -=r. W VIII 11 III I II IIII iilll Il < 1 I I E •�� �1.�
_J III I h11111111 W pmi TM= ...,
pd.
W_. it .,, W I 1 Illu� _F�, W
I-- — F. (�iIIII11111f- ..'_Il[IIIII_Il _ .
o O.
0. (IIIV►114!iIIIIIIiIIIIIGIIHI i•I w ! \ :( c!3
- .
'mss ,4,il I(ill -
Q3 = 'i I I II`1 E I-----I
Hy of
• Lil . Illlll llill:� _ rj =_ e_
• j lll:4.,., -�i�.....m1.,
---1. tJ .._.....
,I Ii;hlll
. 0 i
. s'
It
. IL( 1 •
-
N
co
KI Ke� r
H O t
. s8'_ .4 P j.
a
to
s
0
£fi OF , s
Ai&
. rit- -":
i! 1
1.1i , 1 •
.-W M 'I MBINil IIRIIIINIIr
i_ I �;
api
:II,, mac. L—��
wi i• I_ ,/ .nn
� � ...1:, • I I •
II.— m ■�iil � ii • 4 • ;V III • � �
al BEN ��i, w* �■ I •• I
— Mil I•ai *d ��� ,i ,u all. II
II II �! ®IINII iii 1017.,:., — IN ...magspiiimi ill, -;�" , � .�. i 1°,al im.
---- ms"e■.-17.1,2.5.11iiiillialil A kg - - J
!I rii-jr■,:i,pgiiiiiiii-&ii ,, -.7.--LTEN II ' RI. a.
Eil
- 141111T EI 1T--ar7lu-i
- ;,�.,<<_iii l i, J
_ lit -K --
IL.3 a
�� ■R rte_ I-
� L -I ■ E ._�_
s Q-C? ,. 0
III Iii III a. • .
6.■1 Ell
i Id-
U o.
•
. 1 (-40 SI
r. .Py\.,ri i• I''t. Yi d
Tom' / KU~ 11 AM cT
il 11
49 I
` 1 �.� Mira w. K;Mf,11.
l — 1
It ` c��i�1�1ri E s>>&i, S L , g�{ :� 04.E
MRWM#Kurt.1•1e....w
GlOs
IP Wilt M•%•..1.1011 N...L M'S..r
O ' . e1f11►Krr~/1
y^I
f
1 �
II 1
I
orms 1,
f
- .eg ....... Mod 1 • 0
c me ,IyN ELZN ATION �•I+k+w-t..,y•.a+,' ,
V' ML•I ' .way tcriA
Mr
• (h1tuT1 041414.
451GtJ As o(fig .. 12'5 41 1petz tke &toss
G H MS R-esr n /EPGAN, 1114.) .
. up ,Prep 6-7. t4. i a.
. A 012
,
treat grM,Vr•OM+y ,i •.-.-: -_.. iIiA MO le f.4. -..w.-.....�
M..••.••••■••••• •••Wit•RN C.-'_._. i iii; -a .--—s•r
(09
a.
t jtLi r"'^Zjat'0.. ', .' , '4......_. un174o0 ow.14131314>A c t
HLY3H 1
euit,Md1a9 7.O e J :°
ti ;3sa::< 11I
211: ;Pi.rtg �tr.t •
•
Ai _ r
.L -- - - -__ - J- ..
• •Q D
..r7Z ] ./ i
! CD
en.) s.v .
Lii
u3 w
2 �Za !! 1
1h 1k Sap. >< ►-4i`t
ti�•2 `.0 I DS Wie lit 1.Y
Q$�� a� a a S �3Y' T°poi°<
t1+' .1 t a= 3.fii.44ur>
p..v. 2ov :4:1 ,3.°1i 1.6111}
1Lvil? Soo 1wZa: itj4.4 ° ...01 •-
�pl�y
al
J
•
;
Z ,
WC k
41---.... .— % - .j611 .
MD "j 111111111 co I
0.(x.7 sc ■� 0
�' �.- I u_ i
's
_. vq , ) Mill =3
U ,
•
' L ' . \ •
W 7
• W
•
•
. .614
. et
F1.. ¢ aL
p
!!h; a , t 7
?� ;syi:r1ff . . 93'3 3 ;t
X10%J to •s:1^.11.- �C° Sd .o -•o
1:,11•i euliz1 • 04141 02 V•!41:J
a 1 .
n so7 ?fJ :I :5i s i.t i.i.7 ,
•
•
• rc
•
•
1.. .......st--" Ul . ..
r J '• •
\ .. • 6. \ •- i ? i ` erns': J
7 '` t
Y— r -I-, � z r� d 1
Z r1 S
- 0
:E 8
RS -4. 1: y
lib pJ
leo- 16 • - _
Uhir lig Z Q S fiI , ; b J02•; - # •a e I : y _ • Cr
45 r t3a Jr f ••Ac•
Li : ':Ant fag R? '�` v `•,.• r1 r 1 /a �i •
} •se •ib
III r a a a= z
11i Z
s �_ Q il M < �p b7 e 1
• W'
_.1 1v 1'I
M� .1
t � I _; I L' t..is
•< �.i III NI Inn .a L I I J iad _ '.�S=ri��
sQ?' 0 i H
}- i �� I C )
4 , i zi mina.-1-2
.. sy• -.am _.
O= w' i i obi` 1�7:
•
i J i I a• :ill.- n
tr 11J, al MIMI
aim
TN 1 111 i 211121.1
in milli t, I• MI woe I 1« ;
yF � .�
J �
%f 11 N •
- 1• 1 Illi • "
11- 0 I,
�'f F 1 1. 1 III; I _ `
�I . r
�T�
• y2 W ;
K1 •1LN I i s b y C..11 on, W •
�, r Bore 4
1fi �4�t r4 O
•
•
` _
I
•
Page 17/EAGAN ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
JULY 28, 1992
BRINKER INTERNATIONAL
CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS
Chairman Voracek opened the next public hearing of the evening
regarding a Planned Development Amendment changing the use from
retail to a Class I (sit down) restaurant and Conditional Use Permits
to allow on-sale liquor, 3.2 beer or wine, and a pylon sign on Lot 2,
Block 1, Duckwood Crossings located along the west side of Pilot Knob
Road in the SE 1/4 of Section 16.
City Planner Sturm stated that the exterior of the proposed
building will be dark brown/reddish brick with green and pink
awnings. Mr. Sturm requested that City staff be allowed to work with
the applicant on the location of the pylon sign. City staff requests
that the sign be moved to the north so that when the property to the
south is developed the pylon signs will be spaced evenly. He stated
that the applicant agreed with this. All City setback and parking
requirements are satisfied with this application.
• Randy Engel, architect for the applicant, commented that this was
a high quality restaurant and a good use for this piece of land. He
stated he was there to answer any questions.
Miller moved, Hoeft seconded, a motion to approve a Planned
Development Amendment changing the use from retail to a Class I (sit
down) restaurant, subject to the following conditions:
1. A planned Development Agreement Amendment shall be executed.
2. The trash/recycling containers shall be in an enclosure made
of the same materials and also attached to the building.
3. All liquor license provisions shall be adhered to.
4. A one-time sign fee shall be required for all signs and all
Signage Code requirements shall be adhered to.
5. No rooftop mechanical equipment shall be visible from Pilot
Knob Road.
6. The landscape plan shall conform to the overall Planned
Development landscape plan. Berming along all parking areas •
shall be provided and irrigation shall be required in all •
green areas.
7. No outdoor storage other than the trash recycling area shall
be allowed.
8. All applicable Code requirements.
All present voted in favor. 17
Page 18/EAGAN ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
JULY 28, 1992
Miller moved, Hoeft seconded, a motion to approve a Conditional
Use Permit to allow a pylon sign on Lot 2, Block 1, Duckwood
Crossings located along the west side of Pilot Knob Road in the SE
1/4 of Section 16, subject to the following condition:
1. Shall run with the land and be recorded with Dakota County
within 60 days of Council action with documentation provided
to the City.
All present voted in favor.
Miller moved, Hoeft seconded, the motion to approve a Conditional
Use Permit to allow on-sale liquor, 3.2 beer or wine, on Lot 2, Block
1, Duckwood Crossings located along the west side of Pilot Knob Road
in the SE 1/4 of Section 16, subject to the following condition:
1. Shall run with the land and be recorded with Dakota County
within 60 days of Council action with documentation provided
to the City.
All present voted in favor.
1 X13
MEMORANDUM
TO: TOM HEDGES, CITY ADMINISTRATOR
DALE RUNKLE, DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
FROM: JIM STURM, CITY PLANNER
DATE: AUGUST 11, 1992
RE: PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AMENDMENT/CONDITIONAL USE
PERMITS
BRINKER INTERNATIONAL
At the July 28 Advisory Planning Commission meeting, the Planned Development
Amendment changing the use from a retail strip center to a Chili's restaurant on Lot 2 of
the Duckwood Crossings Planned Development was approved unanimously. There was very
little discussion and no changes to the conditions were made. Please note that the applicant
and their representatives have been very cooperative throughout the planning process
responding quickly to our issues and concerns. Only minor changes to the site plan are still
being discussed with the applicant:
1. Moving the pylon sign slightly to the north so there can be more equal space in
between this sign and the future one on the lot to the south. (It would still be at
least 300' from the Holiday pylon sign to the north).
2. Additional landscaping in the parking lot and the bermed areas along the public
streets.
The applicant has agreed to both, and is in the process of preparing revised drawings. Also,
both Conditional Use Permits to allow liquor, 3.2 beer or wine, and a pylon sign were
approved unanimously. If you would like additional information, please contact me.
City Planner
JS/js
Agenda Information Memo
August 18, 1992 City Council Meeting
BUILDING PERMIT PRIOR TO PLAT/TOBY STEVENS
F. Building Permit Prior to Platting Property,Toby T. Stevens, Government Lot 7, Section
18,Township 27,Range 23--An application has been received of Toby Stevens for a building
permit prior to plat for the above-referenced property. The City requires the platting of
property prior to the issuance of building permits. For additional information relative to
this application, please refer to the Co i. ��unity Development Department memorandum
which is enclosed on pages through k and covers correspondence from Mr. Stevens
and his attorney relative to this matter. Staff has been discussing this matter with Mr.
Stevens for approximately six months.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny a building permit
prior to platting of property for Toby T. Stevens for Government Lot 7, Section 18,
Township 27, Range 23 as presented.
\ �
MEMORANDUM
TO: DALE RUNICLE, DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
FROM: SHANNON
TYREE, PROJECT r
DATE: AUGUST 14, 1992
RE: STEVENS ADDITION
On February 10, 1992 Mr. Stevens inquired about developing a single family lot in the
Wuthering Heights neighborhood. City staff explained in detail the requirements necessary
for platting the lot.
In October 1991 Mr. Bill Jones, representing Mr. Robert Rohif, inquired about obtaining
a building permit for a premanufactured home. The home was scheduled for delivery prior
to Mr. Jones becoming aware of the platting requirements. At the February 25, 1992 City
Council meeting a building permit was approved for a premanufactured home prior to
platting of Robert Rohif's 1st Addition with the condition that the platting application and
. all associated fees be paid in advance of the issuance of this building permit.
Mr. Stevens has been aware of City platting requirements and the corresponding time line
for over five months and has yet to submit his Preliminary Plat application to the City. Mr.
Stevens is requesting special consideration by the City Council to issue a building permit
prior to platting his parcel.
Project Planner
•
ST/js
RECEIVED AUG ° 1gg2
Toby T. Stevens
2095 Silver Bell Rd. #2
Eagan, MN 55122
August 4 , 1992
Honorable Mayor Tom Egan
3830 Pilot Knob Road
Eagan, MN 55122
Dear Honorable Mayor Egan:
I am married with two small children. My wife's name is
Nancy and my children' s names are Mychal and Marissa. I
have been a very happy resident of the city of Eagan for
eight years .
Very recently I purchased a parcel of land ( see attached
description) in an R1 area on Wuthering Heights Road with
the intention to build a single family home. I have re-
tained a surveyor for the plat process and a builder for
construction. Both of them are among the best in their
fields and each have over 25 years_experience. I have
made verbal commitment to both of these professionals ,
that the project will take place this fall , with ground
breaking to begin around the middle of September. The
surveyor has already completed the preliminary plat
application to be submitted by the 15th of August and
the builder has set up his schedule to tentatively
begin construction as planned.
I have worked very hard to reach a point where it has be-
come economically possible for to build my family a
home. Interest rates are good now, and that is a major
factor for me to be able to build, as well as for others
who are considering building or buying now. I am very
fearful of what interest rates might be next spring and
the effect higher rates might have on my ability to build.
Please consider my situation, as you did for the owners of
the land in the Rohlf ' s First Addition. This year you
granted them a building permit before the plat was completed
and I would like to be extended the same privilege so that
I may build a home this fall. My lot is improved, ready to
build, with all the hook-ups in place. I have confirmed
this with the engineering dept. and with my surveyor.
Thank you very much for your help in this matter.
Sincere,1y,
Toby T. Stevens
07/30/92 16:87 a 612 423 2255 CHAS NOVAK ARCHT 01
. 14.)!
DELMAR H. SCHWANZ
.M..eM..et as
es„rw ewr,.e w ne tub r*woo
IHe SOUTH SQarti WWI RQee ao.p$.tNNINSOiA sane Memo-1755
eueveroR'S CE117KICAtE
Strblsiasry Platy STRVRN5 A001l100 1
Owner-Developer, Nancy and Toby Ot•VSf.
Ocelot 1 Inch ■ SO fast
Descriptions All that pact of enrereassnt tot 7.
section 10, Township 27. Pangs 21 described se
/
follow., Cderionsing at a point 551.5 feet Rest /
and 272.25 feet North of ths poutlwset porno, / i /
of Government Iot 7, Motion le. Township 17, _ .
them,211 thee Met and perellsl to the South i
i{ae of said Qnr.rnasst Lot 7 • di t 190 //
test. thence North end parail.l to the west line ,...,../2"
of paid Government Lot 7 a distant. of 711.11 East, I
thanes Soothwaaterly a distance of 145.01 feet to -$,.j/ / Y.,/
North a point that I. 551.0 East Oast and 414.13 feet I
North of the SOUthMSt corner thereof. thence /. 1
South end parallel to the eeet fine of ►ell ZA ,� A `)Oo,ernment Ent 7 a disease. of 151.15 fast to 1 1 / 1 l.�
the piece et beginning. DO (}8'O /e' r0/ '
AP' /‘ t.,./ :�I
here, erne■ Ares 45,060 fauere East r 0 *
Lot 1 34,500 square feet t
Street 11.160 enuara leaf I ,'
sailing doning R-1 Single lenity residential / ,� 0/� �
'imposed toning Rene / / 1� 4.> ( ( �yl ( `/
wore.: Ares is serval by City panitarr .//z/V/�/gi0/11 �vS 7 ( I �`�
sewn end water with matrices •.
provided fur this let. i/ / �1 I �.• m I ,
Road is currently an easement rood / ( h-r and Ras a grass/ ■urf■re. //
Ii 30 J
�h r
Pie .red Sr: noisier N. Schema band surveyor. Inc. "I°-- -'dl I ��
14750 Louth Robert Trail ' f ' ' ,` S
Ro.pwoant. mn 5506e (1{ 4� LT /Tb1. 421-1769I I B!.oC�( / 1
-- all),, I i 11 �
�!� �« N MAi•ry Assn.-nor. /1,4?Lc
r7 le /60.A9 } —N /
Post-It's brand fax transmittal memo 7671 I«of pose« s G /
/torn c-- LI ` /Q0.00 _.
Oept. - one d i(3 -/,6 /. (y4j
'
I
t
' `�ril� .x v
en
1 I
r-
• e r. iR.7Z)ti/-.f'zW
env 775 L ht/g. r
•
. e;0 1.I'T.(OT 7
WOWS!W Ala Cr unbar MI'44•14 aupnwb■and
yeas I sin•NA R•.,e,we LW Suneyr.v.da• 4114
Ma WO 10 IM SUM e,IlIn neele
0•ea N.Owranr
Owed 07-20-92 4lawyaaaie llbewaaM ace WI
\1(
1■• ■•. ... .
;
P
. q.....". '''".. - - ••••‘‘.-"., * . **,‘ ,k. -1 N P I. I
,
- • \4 \ ‘44‘ •s‘ it.• " : e
• s •k ;gig,' ‘ft, ..,, -'4,-t.., 0 ,. • --/
14
^. . ••. -• -..-.*..1%i.7.-...::'•.-•• , ' .1, 41 \NI'\ •koAt N. ,
‘•••1,.. . Ofi i •: .; 1 1
• . ' • •/../.7.,•,,....,:"••. '''•• ' 1 , • kt •4/%,.
. /
•... .,/, ..1" /i. • k ', , ...#1,.. \ NI;, .12 -...4''#,•,... f ' .r-
, ( // I/ ' .1
" :It.•;,." . -' , ./ , I 74 4" I A*•■•'' '/ 4T1... -‘4.N. •
--:......,--x•.., . .,.., . e, ( , , ••,k#1.4.?„. z
''. 1...r Z f # ,, • 1 1
# • 1 ii
••• • ,
). \\,;.....••••• / • ' -,,..• ',Ns.. ..., • It.t. .' i ir 0 k "1
/ f- ,,' --.:- •40, -...., -, 7Z 4. 4.1%.,.._/ , 0 ... .'l
' \ '1' 4 I ..,,, ,, ,.0.,q /, %I It...k..,.., .. 4.,p ri., 110.1 4.„,... N % ,
1,4 . 1
.,
\ ' -. -\\;\ ■ i, I -- -n 'ie... .•■•4, ..„ -747„ '111
. / S t• / • ‘*, n'''... *a) " I 4.
d
/ ..,,,,. . I
-- : - --... ' -Nes. k.. .1;,.•-•—, VC". ,f1 •■ 4' lf57
/ 1., .‘1 . ; 77 .../1%-.Nly '4'w' s't.:i4N.
`t$1.....i.4°
_ ,
.- . s'i•.\1 • .
- • '. L: ..... .., .. "At 4%,, / 14''', "6..1`W%-..__ •fr •
t ( 4. i 4!. 7, 'I A-,-_ :. . i ... • .‘16 1/4 ar •• 4;'5:.. t'-"f 1;'' ...
.....-1
% %p %.., ■ , N..-z-a ...-: i
k : • \ g' ''.. ,.. a., ,......
■ - ..-,- ----,-....,
, . ....„ 1 ..„,,..- ..../.. ..• ,, jr 41/4 '' lik\ %1Z-..... - 1%,,,,..t,, Z.'. —..-...... .
. " •
r",".•• ..‘„.'•'',. • .4,*".--.1 /-.1 1„..• •
\ •-•-. t"11. • -- - V-.1 1
.... • • ' , ` ••*
, s . .... / ,.*/ I i i • / i ii / '..,. 1 1 • . . ..i-...P
‘ ,
...s * .......\.. ... .. , _.,_ .. ,.../._ ,441'.1 IA -1. ,___, , .,/r. , .. _:... . ..., „,
• . i • , ..• ., , , l 1.• .
'•'• ,./ / f 1./ 1
. 5
1... ." .'‘ .1 \ \ ,. I !' ...., , / ' i f /
• , I ' I / / I I
)._.0,Z_ / A ■ ‘
' , 4",-,•7 / O' 1 , / I
-1-1.t.'•,•. •, ••• / •. i .- .0 ,s.' / ,.',/ , i / I / • . •■••••-■.-- --'-'"?....7 'Ik "4,4\ N I
I': •:'. ••, .
‘C‘41.' •.! 1 k L.. // / / /1/ I f / . , .
z>_.1...-ss•i L-\.:'.•-2.."-...."':•.=:1:..!.7•--•.".•3•-,._.•',-•-:-,.A 7••-••-.-_7.:•V-.7'..'.'-._‘T.-.a's_4,i._.k..i....
.c-i-.t.•k.1,t‘.1,.o i,-4;.-\..,,.:;•k:.,t-.%„...%-.,:,..t-,1 1 i..N.-s..:‘-.‘0...•0—...4...,,-.s"-I.--.i.._I-,,•'.,\.i-••`'-,./.......-../S..-...,t,'-o..,.‘..-.‹/'.S:/•.-.-,••.••,•...1,.//,,/-•/m••i,•,/.../-.,/,—/..•//.-/.-,'///'///'.•///•/'///''1 i•••./,i',l i.•'e',
i'.'.,/-.,../,-k I.,..‘/i..-S....'....';k./........ i.'k.,„i..'r.//!/s../.\..'1..1'• 1i i.,4 2 N•I 7
!'!::,•
1 4 1;
E
'• A 1 %:,•
i•i*
' Jill
1 g
--- -- -..-•:-....-z-7,..:-,.:-.., ..1.,. . ..-.... -- i #
.-..:•::..-•-• ,-.1:-.11-....,-.A..zi.-ce..:z.i(c. ".....s• ( •' .• . 1 0 F
-- -,''.....7, --71-:-,....-:•-......., •-...•• •....... t
' , *--\'':..,•-' , ..;-' --, , l ..4-'4' •-•*”. I I . / ,. 1 I II 6
i I II lu
, ,
tka, 0 1
,' - ' -- s'—'....." • ''.. --..., l ..''.. ,.."- I ,
-- I l‘f\,,„....„• \ ' 7 N ....A,...--' / • A 1 1 I ) II
i •-•,2,".., ....• ..N-1
• --*7-r-'<-'--- ----_..._> - ,-.'s...--.\
%.
•-•i /
/ I li I 1 II i • 1 If ..,
.; r
41. \\\ .1 . ‘ \ i a 4 a 8 a I 1 1, 1.
,.-..,. .......-..:.•-,-,,--, _,..-.7_,-.- _-.., / 1 1 \ 1 ,
ri- ortr--7.r••- / ' /I`•
....:-.....'•; ,::Z:7:t•..,•-• -'- 1)I ..:\' ‘ 1 \ il f .
el, _ j.....-_•.::'- . -._-.".7..1.-_.:.'''',::/ V I I , • ,.•....cs,
.• / / 1 d.1.S.:75::.4 .„..:;- 11:
■ , . t . / 1 ,1--. '' 11 It „V"V-7.-■":74.7-iii--%0'$-I
t■,2' ..-." :1-- .---,T...:b..,..,.: ,--/ .t% / Ir ., 1
I
.. ._.‘,
• .-•' -". - - \ ..._,_ f Id i .....0
■'•:N' ( .- -• .7),..':..7Z.(.:•7...',.75:-.-3, . --/ 1 lilt 11,1 •/,i _,\(*:%/..,,,,I T
04, ..i .31 ._-,-. ,- . ,,,..-J..,.li I
I 7;,';./- , / t VNtat:4'1'7,— (•::".--s li
.,
\\k , ./"■
%... 11#• o. .1""'-1 -. \ 7*''''•• II
'' 7"" ... O' -
■,, '' C ' NN...)/ i f ."-.--'-■-,_; ..
.. .... / 1..-•%'... . . i (.-)
.,
•):' \ ---.V'-, - ,, . --
.1 V .-... • n •,,..... , ... 4....„.... ,
\ . . . c''0 .4( ' - ',. •, \ , / __,...-,- .•1 / ../...,-;f ••• --"7", I.
ii
\ s.: . -'7 7' L4-: . ‘''''..\...4-..---.••••••••-•----.1-°-- / ••---.• .--•• "..--) •1
1 i,
.
• - '. \ \ La •
‘.'\... '‘k .',■• _• ...."7' •_.-- .......•, ''' ..1...„..,..- P-•:' 1
il I
' ' ,•.,,, Q•••••**.N s.,‘ • „
„ , 0
17.1-'7.•:;, ,t,••••• ' ItiL •.. C (7)\C(N)I • '''' •/--"". '• /I ,.. 0,
tk,..-,‘....,• ...,V., Z‘):, ,. s\ \\ \ 0 1111 •1, e.- 'j(et I rN-11 I —s'' 1,1s' i'
1 . ....?`.:'\ ■: :* ,`. • t I
k lz,-Cz.•,.,1\,..,..1.;:ts.:...;"^„,,, \ N , i /,'`%I
1.. i.-7.. .,• r• •••‘•\•••,S.S Is, ,s,....;•....,\ \ )c'1"\•••:-...4.... .4. .,/ /
1 ' ‘. •\1, \\'■ \ ■ 1 ,:fh... , ..... . . \ '''•d / I
I
t ' v• v% .\:' ,
I N\\s ,.„-......... .s..,r3.,.‘,,;•.\\; ,, __ -,..:--fti
. „,..,- ...„\N ,%\ , • --,........,. _.,.J._4,L _/.... _7...N.---i N- - --=4--.
I 1 I NI .r. \\\\ \\ ,'":".:• *•.\\\ \ '‘. --", % , ..:**--- / r .....,- ../.. V.... •''''-•••• -•
---.*"
1 1 ..,,,.,."...d. "7 ., • , I e N1
N', /k.V'.• •
1 I %, ,. \‘',‘ s ,:■\,\\\,. ‘. . ..,. ‘.1 Ill I , / ..., ( -.. / i
1 1 int\ ` ‘\`‘,...*• \:-' " ‘1:1, •:fe.,-s.- \.. . I I f I 6.1 g""i •
V ,
.1 / 1 /1 izo,\\...,‘,NN...,..4,,,,,......,....q,....... ,z... .... ■0•,,.. -..9i_.....--,,-..% , i 1 \ 1 • Eii
•II'
,, ..., , , ,,, „N.,.........,,, \.$7c.;\ :;:,,,,,,,,..,„-- -- .... „ , 1 , .1 1 , ,„.,....
...• f./ r t i/ i.7..1_k•., ..\•••••0‘\•••,‘ \••• - +NAP / i 4 I . . I % . .......0V
, .._
... ..- V , „ --,:- - • - \'.' __-_-777-7-7-- .-__-_ ,
- „,.1 I ile 1..„1.:.... \‘‘.,..,,,‘...1) ,....:,,,,Net...7._...,-, I 1
' .i I - 1 11 WINE HLa110] V
..
---. ,y ' ii,--k.,..‘...:14-,--, 0,,:‘,..-,.::\,,:t-tiv\I-•-,,
_ , ,
,
/ii ,',./5-1- z ) V . 0,,•'•••e',:',..Z.4%..Z,pr',1,-• N ‘ i .....,1 1 IIIW a •.,
! 1 • ..•—''.4 •
.... ---A, ------ '-'- ' , ■ ■ \-? ■ ;,.0\`‘‘‘"\‘‘" ‘‘ si 1 I •, \ ■ I- -le — • • % 1
1,........— ,....,--- 1 f , N ■ ■ `..• ,,N‘ \'- \%II I 1 1 .1. t.— , ---
.- .....t_ 6.•,-1 1
\ I k \ \ •,,\ N ' \ 1 1 . o % l
i , -. . ) , ‘ s•‘ ‘‘\‘‘‘ .4%%, ‘ ‘ \ ` ■ , t It ./ . % . /
-:: • - -- . / \ % k\ ' • , 1
... . - •---r. , \--,- \ , ,,,:,- , ‘, -A; - % ‘ \ % % ,-- ,
\ , •_..... , „ , ...,. ,,,;„
.. , \ 1 i //,'. 1
- -- -- - - %-. ‘ , k „ , e I A %• k N1,•■•''S • 's • ‘
, _.. . ... ‘ , . \ N.„. \ S. k ...\,,, - otx‘.., .„ • , \ _ 1, ..■ . ...../ / i
% s. ,....,,..,, . . ‘ .., N„... ‘.... ‘ ‘ \
\ ''‘' s...." :'.... •st.,‘ P..•.„.V.:',:.„ ‘.''.%
/ , P
k•-- ..'.-.-'is. ■ -`l .,.\s,‘,",..::,,\'•,,,Ns\‘., ‘,\■,:s,,..,,,,,,Z..^..,.....\\,,zt.:::,..,,"4. t‘...., kill\‘:.,,,,,‘N% 1.: / #, i ifi,
-....‘"./.■. I I 1 • --1 ‘ ‘ ‘ \N \‘'4.\\•‘•••„• A-‘. % k-goo , 1 II I al/1/i/illi .
..:., •---' / 1 ..- t i ,- ‘ .,.. ,t, \ ,,1,,,,,„,•.‘„,-, \\IA.,- 1 \ % .1 kC1 I
, •';,_ \ / . \ % ,\ ‘1 \ i;‘,•\s .„s‘‘,110 - 74,41(:■- e/0-
•• .. -...„ • . -•._ ... 1 %\`•‘ V, • '', •'N.-•••%4At..... t-A_-
. *.P.... j \S'.Z...V... S ' S SIt S:14.....4 ":!,..... , , • ,.
■ / ...., .... ‘..‘\., 1 ‘t .., • ‘\\,, ,...., ,.. .,
11 t \ \ S. \ ‘■!..• "*.ts... li.,:./as ••• '•••• 4,.- 1:1111•11r 1 )7
1 i•
li' ' \\ S s'• \‘‘‘ ' V-..4. i • ' 'S .1.... 1
I ‘ 1 •s•,s. ‘ ‘ ....7.,.. ...V.?. n.'74..7.4.\ ‘ t
e 4. / A \ ‘ ,sk Sts.:: .11•'• %.r..,,,SS.. . .‘.....4• 1 1. 1 1
" '..\''''• \ \ ..•••••.... •St 1 I 1
• \\
‘ ( I 1 i / t \ 0\ ‘
• ,
P. % 4010 e 1 \ ■ %.**Z. . ..I....170 . —
‘ '• . --.„.:: ,. - 4 - -_, ....,-
Zel 1HONtl )IUAON SI:11.13 SSZZ En, Zi9 E L01:91 Z6,02,L0
ESTHER M. LlER1viAN
ATTORNEY AT LAW
EAGAN EAST EXECUTIVE BUILDING
3435 WASHINGTON DRIVE. SUITE 202
EAGAN. MINNESOTA 55122
(612) 452-1431
August 5 , 1992
Mayor Thomas Egan
3830 Pilot Knob Road
Eagan, Minnesota 55122
Dear Mayor Egan,
I have represented Toby and Nancy Stevens in connection with the
purchase of property located in Government Lot 7 , Section 18 ,
Township 27 , Range 23 , Dakota County , Minnesota . This property is
a single parcel of land upon which Mr . and Mrs . Stevens intend to
build a single family home .
Mr . and Mrs . Stevens have asked me to write this letter in support
of their application for a building permit . Mr . and Mrs . Stevens .
have already retained a surveyor and a preliminary plat will be
submitted by August 15 . As time is of the essence due to
fluctuation in interest rates , they are requesting that they be
issued a building permit prior to final plat approval .
The owners of land in Rohlf ' s First Addition, property that is
located near the Stevens ' property, were faced with a similar
situation and were granted a building permit in conjunction with
submitting a plat for final approval . Mr . and Mrs . Stevens are
simply requesting that their application for a building permit be
granted as was their neighbors application and in accordance with
the prior actions of the city council .
Thank you for your consideration in this matter .
Sincerely ,
Esther M. Lerman
EML/sb
Lin
Agenda Information Memo
August 18, 1992 City Council Meeting
ORDINANCE AMENDMENT/COD ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS
G. Ordinance Amendment, City of Eagan, to Chapters 2, 11 and 13 of the City Code
Regarding Code Enforcement Officers--Enclosed on pages/? rough 0:d7 are copies
of the proposed amendments to the above-referenced chapters of the City e. Currently,
Y
the City Code makes numerous references to the zoning administrator as the primary code
enforcement officer for code violations. That role is currently filled by the Community
Development Director, City Planner and Project Planners. To clarify the permission for
these individuals to act on behalf of the City in this regard, it is proposed that the
highlighted changes be made in each of the code chapters as indicated.
At its regular meeting of July 28, 1992, the Advisory Planning Commission co a ed these
amendments. A copy of the APC minutes in this regard is enclosed on page 1,j for your
review. The APC is recommending approval.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the ordinance
amendments of City Code Chapters 2, 11 and 13 regarding code enforcement officers as
presented.
A1. 14 '92 09:02 SEUERSON.WILCOX S. ShENDON C 886 P02
ORDINANCE NO. 2ND SERIES
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EAGAN, MINNESOTA, AMENDING EAGAN CITY
CODE CHAPTER TWO ENTITLED "ADMINISTRATION AND GENERAL GOVERNMENT" BY
AMENDING SECTION 2.38 REGARDING OFFICIALS AUTHORIZED TO ISSUE
CITATIONS; AND BY ADOPTING BY REFERENCE EAGAN CITY CODE CHAPTER 1 AND
SECTION 2.99.
The City Council of the City of Eagan does ordain:
Section 1. Eagan City Code Chapter Two is hereby amended by changing
Section 2.38, subd. 2(C) , to read as follows:
C. City Planner, Community Development Director and
Project Planner.
Section 2. Eagan City Code Chapter 7. entitled "General Provisions and
Definitions Applicable to the Entire City Code Including /Penalty for
Violation" and Section 2.99, entitled "Violation a Misdemeanor" are
hereby adopted in their entirety by reference as though repeated
verbatim.
Section 3. Effective Date. This ordinance shall take effect upon its
adoption and publication according to law.
ATTEST: CITY OF RAGAN
City Council
By: E. J. VanOverbeke By: Thomas A. Egan
Its: Clark Its: Mayor
Date Ordinance Adopted:
Date Ordinance Published in the Legal Newspaper:
•
JLL 14 '92 09:02 SEUERSON.WILCax & ShENDQ' C 986 P03
ORDINANCE NO. 2ND SERIES
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EAGAN, MINNESOTA, AMENDING EAGAN CITY
CODE CHAPTER THIRTEEN ENTITLED "SUBDIVISION REGULATION" BY AMENDING
SECTION 13.40 REGARDING ADMINISTRATION AND ENFORCEMENT; AND BY
ADOPTING BY REFERENCE EAGAN CITY CODE CHAPTER 1 AND SECTION 13.99.
The City Council of the City of Eagan does ordain:
Section 1. Eagan City Code Chapter is hereby amended by changing
13.40, subd. 1(A) , to read as follows:
Subd. 1. Enforcing Officer.
A. The rnnnr.i 1 shall designate r City employee who shall
be primarily responsible for the enforcement of this
Chapter.
Section 2. Eagan City Code Chapter 1 entitled "General Provisions and
Definitions Applicable to the Entire City Code Including 'Penalty for
Violation'" and Section 13.99, entitled "Violation a Misdemeanor" are
hereby adopted in their entirety by reference as though repeated
verbatim.
Section 3. Effective Date. This ordinance shall take effect upon its
adoption and publication according to law.
ATTEST: CITY OF EAGAN
City Council
By: E. J. VanOverbeke By: Thomas A. Egan
Its: Clerk Its: Mayor
Date Ordinance Adopted:
Date Ordinance Published in the Legal Newspaper: .
Date of Advisory Planning Commission Hearing:
•
3
ORDINANCE NO. 2ND SERIES
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EAGAN, MINNESOTA, AMENDING EAGAN CITY
CODE CHAPTER ELEVEN ENTITLED "LANDUSE REGULATIONS" BY AMENDING
SECTION 11.80 REGARDING REDESIGNATING AUTHORITY OF ZONING
ADMINISTRATOR TO COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR OR PROJECT PLANNER IN
THE FLOOD PLAIN REGULATIONS; AND BY ADOPTING BY REFERENCE EAGAN CITY
CODE CHAPTER 1 AND SECTION 11.99.
The City Council of the City of Eagan does ordain:
Section 1. Eagan City Code Chapter Eleven is hereby amended by
changing Section 11. 80, subd. 3 (C) , to read as follows:
C. Map Interpretation. The boundaries of the flood plain
district shall be determined by scaling distances on the
Official Flood Plain Zoning District Map. Wherein
interpretation is needed as to the exact location of the
boundaries of the Flood Plain District, the -Seiriner-
ie ems— Community Development Director or Project
Planner shall make the necessary interpretations based on
. elevations of the regional (100 year) flood profile, if
available. If 100 year flood elevations are not available,
the City shall: 1) require a flood plain evaluation
consistent with Section 11.80, subd. 5 of this Ordinance to
determine a 100 year elevation for this site; or 2) base its
decision on available hydraulics/hydrologic or site
elevation survey data which demonstrates the. likelihood the
site is within or outside the flood plain.
Section 2. Eagan City Code Chapter Eleven is hereby amended by
changing Section 11. 80, subd. 5, to read as follows:
Subd. 5. Flood Plain Evaluation Procedure.
A. Site Evaluation. Upon receipt of an application for a
Conditional Use Permit, variance, manufactured home
park development or subdivision approval. within the
Flood Plain District, the
Community Development Director or Proiect Planner shall
require the applicant to furnish sufficient site
development plans in a hydrologic/hydraulic analysis by
a certified engineer, hydrologist, or other qualified
person, specifying the nature of the development and
whether the proposed use is located in the Floodway or
Flood Fringe and the Regulatory Flood Protection
elevation for the site. Procedures consistent with
Minnesota Rules 1983, Part 6120.5000 (Technical
Standards and Requirements for Flood Plain Evaluations)
and 6120.5700 (Minimum Flood Plain Management Standards
for Local Ordinances) shall be followed during the
technical evaluation and review of the development
proposal.
B. Notification to DNR. The Community
Development Director or Proiect Planner shall submit
one copy of all information required by Section
C13.4 (1) 11.80. subd. 5(A) . of this ordinance to the
Department of Natural Resources' Area Hydrologist for
review and comment at least ten (10) days prior to the
granting of a Conditional Use Permit, Variance or
Zoning Amendment, and at least twenty (20) days prior
to the granting of a subdivision approval by the City.
The Community Development Director
or Proiect Planner shall notify the Department of
Natural Resources' Area Hydrologist within ten (10)
days after a Conditional Use Permit, variance,
subdivision or manufactured home park development
subdivision is approved by the County City.
C. Certification of Lowest Floor Elevations. Lowest floor
elevations shall not be permitted below the flood line.
The applicant shall be required to submit certification
by a registered professional engineer, registered
architect, or registered land survey, that the finish
fill and building elevations were accomplished in
compliance with the provisions of this Ordinance. The
Community Development Director or
Project Planner shall maintain a record of the
elevation of the lowest floor (including basement) for
all alterations or additions, to existing structures in
the Flood Plain District.
Section 3. Eagan City Code Chapter Eleven is hereby amended by
changing Section 11. 80, subd. 7, to read as follows:
Subd. 7. Special Provisions for Flood Plain Violations.
A. Investigations. When an ordinance violation is either
discovered by or brought to the attention of the s
Administrator Community Deve ooment Director or Proiect
Planner, the Beffift Community Development
Director or Project Planner shall investigate the
situation and document the nature and extent of the
violation of the official control. As soon as
reasonably possible, this information shall be
submitted to the Department of Natural Resources along
with the City's plan of action to correct the violation
to the degree possible.
B. Order. The Community Development
Director or -Project Planner shall notify the suspected
party of the requirements of this Ordinance and all
other Official Controls and the nature and extent of
the suspected violation of these controls. If the
structure or use is under construction or development,
the City Zoning Administrator Community Development
Director or Project Planner may order the construction
immediately halted until a proper permit or approval is
granted by the City. If the construction or development
is already completed, the
Community Development Director or Project Planner shall
either: 1) issue an order identifying the corrective
action that must be made within the specified time
period to bring the use or structure into compliance
with the official controls; or 2) notify the
responsible party to apply for an after-the-fact permit
or development approval within the specified period of
time not to exceed thirty (30) days. If the permit is
not granted, the use or structure shall be immediately
brought into compliance.
C. Final Action. If the responsible party does not
appropriately respond to the
Community Development Director or Project Planner
within the specified period of time, each additional
day that lapse shall constitute an additional violation
of this Ordinance and shall be prosecuted accordingly.
The Community Development Director
or Project Planner shall also, upon the lapse of the
specified response period, notify the landowner to
restore the land to the condition which existed prior
to the violation of this ordinance
Section 5. Eagan City Code Chapter 1 entitled "General Provisions and
Definitions Applicable to the Entire City Code Including 'Penalty for
Violation'" and Section 11.99, entitled "Violation a Misdemeanor" are
hereby adopted in their entirety by reference as though repeated
verbatim.
•
(RP
Section 6. Effective Date. This ordinance shall take effect upon its
adoption and publication according to law.
ATTEST: , CITY OF EAGAN
City Council
By: E. J. VanOverbeke By: Thomas A. Egan .
Its: Clerk Its: Mayor
Date Ordinance Adopted:
Date Ordinance Published in the Legal Newspaper:
Date of Advisory Planning Commission Hearing:
Page 19/EAGAN ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
JULY 28, 1992
CITY OF EAGAN
ORDINANCE AMENDMENT
Chairman Voracek opened the last public hearing of the evening
regarding Ordinance Amendments to Chapters 2, 11 and 13 of the City
Code regarding Code enforcement officers.
City Planner Sturm mentioned that this ordinance amendment will
give all City project planners the authority to issue citations.
Merkley moved, Graves seconded, the motion to approve Ordinance
Amend*dents to Chapters 2, 11 and 13 of the City Code regarding Code
enforcement officers.
All present voted in favor.
MINUTES
June 23 . 1992 . Hunter moved, Hoeft seconded, the motion to
approve the June 23, 1992 Advisory Planning Commission minutes as
presented. All present voted in favor, except Miller, Griggs and
Merkley who abstained.
RECYCLING TASK FORCE COMMITTEE
Chairman Voracek stated that City Administrator Hedges requested
that a representative be chosen to represent the Advisory Planning
Commission on the Recycling Task Force Committee.
Don Hoeft was chosen to serve on this committee and Mark Miller
is to be the alternate if Mr. Hoeft is unable to attend.
ADJOURNMENT
Hunter moved, Merkley seconded, the motion to adjourn the July
28, 1992 Advisory Planning Commission meeting at 11:05 p.m. All voted
in favor.
Secretary - Eagan Advisory
Planning Commission
Agenda Information Memo
August 18, 1992, City Council Meeting
II
CONSIDER CLAIM FOR EXPENSES
(VACATION/LAKESIDE ESTATES)
A. Consider Claim For Expenses Regarding Vacation of Drainage& Utility Easement (Lot
6, Block 1, Lakeside Estates)--The City staff has received a request from Mr. Richard L.
Rosenberg, owner of Lot 6, Block 1, Lakeside Estates, requesting reimbursement for
attorney's fees associated with difficulties in refinancing the house upon discovery of a
drainage and utility easement running through the middle of the house as shown on the
drawing includes on page 'C,p that had never been vacated by the City. Enclosed on
pages �Ct t and )_.is a letter from Mr. Rosenberg requesting the reimbursement for
these attorney's fees.
When the Lakeside Estates plat was approved in 1968, there were no City utilities to service
the 100' lots. Subsequently, the Council required every other lot to be split to ensure that
each building site would incorporate 11/2 lots to maximize the separation of the private septic
and well systems.
After the installation of City utilities in 1979, the City Council approved a Waiver of Plat
for Lots 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6 to restore the original lot lines allowing the original platted lots to
be developed individually. The petitioners for that Waiver of Plat were Mr. Rosenberg,
Tom Waite and Wayne Kittlson. One of the conditions of approval of that Waiver of Plat
was "that the City Council vacate the easement which presently exists on Lot 3 and Lot 6
.... ". This action was similar to previous Council action concerning other similarly affected
lots.
Unfortunately, the vacation of the drainage and utility easement through the center of Lot
6 was never processed nor recorded at Dakota County until Mr. Rosenberg petitioned for
its vacation which was approved by Council action on April 9, 1991. Because of this past
confusion, the Council agreed to waive the $300 vacation fee from Mr. Rosenberg.
It should be noted that the vacation of the other lots associated with the Waiver of Plat
requested by Mr. Kittlson, Rosenberg and Waite were properly vacated upon submission of
a petition signed by Mr. Kittlson and Waite and approved by Council action on June 5,
1984.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve/deny the claims for
expenses associated with vacating a drainage and utility easement over Lot 6, Block 1,
Lakeside Estates.
•
l
File No. 97 896 Exhibit A•
PLAT DRAWING
(THIS IS NOT A SURVEY)
Lot 6, Block 1, Lakeside, Estates, according to the recorded plat
thereof, Dakota County, Minnesota
•
100
!D�. o ,_
, � ►
I ,
I I I I II I
1
h' . i
Itu I
� , l I
∎ I
I'n
I ' I
IJ
r
30' 1 14 Zip I Q,•
2314' 22, I I
Ir
L i
' It. ' 'r{
o I I 21.
I I
to teEp
•
loo _.
A+Igritic. Hill Dr1VE • scle I ": I
14
IProperty Address: 633 Atlantic Hills Drive, Eagan, Mn.
"The location of the improvements shown on this drawing are approximate and are based on a visual inspection of
the premises. The lot dimensions are taken from the recorded plat or county records. This drawing is for informational
purposes and should not be used as a survey. It does not constitute a liability of the company and is intended for
mortgage purposes only."
TIM 21R5 rev. 7179 /VJ//,,11
0
• • i/ / G V • - i r
•
•
1/1140 e< Jai es'exc
G 33 //7z4 Aim //ilia t .
. 2 3
C v ,9 , o v track c P#owc 46-2-C3-Y0
6 4 c k _T A/ 1929 T o i l ' '4 n', "AY4'L ki rr[.f'v�✓, i¢�..e �yJF zl=
wF es tf i off 7,31 city Co4/Arc; I A-,•O IN* /' !u'E' cot, eel
, v/b. IJ , TlFE'L'TJ' ..r s 7Z /d of c 'T .A✓S' P /SGT.!`.
77/ c ( ry c,c,t. c 0,'4 er, 7-61,9r Awe S4 'o 7 9 Tic
I.,
: 6."(iuL/��" V �¢C4Tt 7 c- S /i -rs .x• L-or 3 �-(, I� LivF oAd
Lo T b b^ Ply o f E sirs rs o vie- of(0'044.7 O
is
T w4 S tiCu 7-71kEA. oed.r "4t?,' auen To 775(c
, Ple Po' Lu T L i �+t�. .�'8o c,avt/T /-T/ I gS j AC.,lo%' Ga T r/ %2 o
j;.LeT (. r 8a ugir 77J 0771t72 611 e r= of= Gar C .Q Ado Ndd f!y
A rT otI•cy n c C e.N4 Tt re E- o F 7Y is,' YZ e'
.,tor C 7271tt S Ly;4.G 7 ,'17 7/1c c co",uci'! SA:,d
,.77/417- / r w4J' 0•k 7-e. tf# to Li, m'c LcTr iw 771 /o e C e 'T
., Srk a d /= /5-r Lens' 4-4.-I1 77/1-47- 7-#c= city wo‘,t9
I i e (-- 17- w n1 kur 4 Co"4;T y 77/4-7c ,tom E /FYY
uT T' eAKorb CCuwTp, 3'0 w#( .rug/
e
c-1-- f1 y 77 4'4J•Ve26,r (.1.4 J' /e.,v.v t ar L 7-11/14,/
f/
ioT (y v SE, So Z- wt's-T to 7-/E 477v44iey 7''c
►:; c Tv J7 ,4 ' /-/E- SAr v 7W C i r), o/ & L, L' 0;04 4'
w(77,‘ Co v.e.rx„,r G er 4 L? C /'/ c e
II„ riv tA,Gy 1-ote C(O,J77 Fort I i 7 7v c f,Lec k X-,Tv T7' e¢-a,,
Gems- &ti t'It y �, ,1.G- STS;Lelret 0'7 J., ,-77,/ 41/47-4 co G,c,7x
i;/ 1.1772 te7-cot o /='u rz' Coif A 7y. ..2-14-Po L ." eilc c_ .IZ fly
417Dt'kcx.' F?s e4 k vsi- y a/=634.AA, /5 41,-(4
icE 7 c 0044)z cc/o is w;Tf d4kc'rof co IA ?;
(q( ? ' arf11,4_
0 0
. . . _ 0 tc)
:. .
.
- 0 0
.„. l0 0
-:-.
,. 1...: ,. cr) ret •
I (A- v)0
F-0
ci.4
0
•,•-... .:. I...C.,
it: 1.r.. <
0 e
.
E-c
...r.;
2'43
CI U
C
,
.r. EL.
,:: _
- !- •-• v)u3
10
:.:.
el c : o<
Cf)
, 1,5). .....
:11
. r!:
...a '
f 1
oi
. ...
. ,.... C=
' •....; .
• 1 ii-, 0 r...:
• . ' •,..•
..:.... rrj .• '7 1 ::, W f-
at—
-1-. -!-.- --
!..:. ...3
.....1
H ;7: H L C,
ID -.r.: .1 v)
1 0
- __,... ,
- -- :
, , z F.
.'!.. 17. 1:. 'n .• ,
z
......: , • te,...
..3".
<—
_..:
.... Li !
o.,
....,- , L .7.
— ■: ...L.; •-_- Z a.
Co
i--
..... :-.
,.. .„
4.1 0
-
i—,
!..,...: I_ ..:.... — g-: •,--I _.:
a E-
'-'" 11.-:: 1;i fp Z
a, ..,..: :- •r4 ra)0
... - C.)
. Z<
Li -f !, :'..,i 1...; ..,.. ul 4.} f--, <y,
u: ,-
.-- - ttn .3
<Z
- U, I,. no.: i,.... ...,. ,_! C.: • cO<
." ..:"' -
.,17
_ '..._ III
..
,-% :-.. ,... ....: Li- Z 41 ral
M
!... CU E.
-: .-
L- 0
— --
it: ta, c..) f, 111
.... ...i. —
z
si— •::::: ,: •
..i.... — .-. m gC
...
....: i
U1
._,
:„.
\q )—
• I
MINUTES OF A SPECIAL MEETING OF THE
•
::::EAGAN CITY COUNCIL
Eagan, Minnesota
A special meeting of the Eagart.:City Council was held on Tuesday, July 21, 1992 at 5:00 p.m.
Present were Mayor Egan, Tim Pawlerit ti;Pam McCrea, Ted Wachter and Pat Awada. Also present were
City Administrator Hedges,Community:bevelopment Director Runkle and Assistant to the City Administrator
Hohenstein. Parks&Recreation Director Vraa and Parks Planner Sullivan joined the meeting to provide an
update as noted below.
CEDARVALE REDEVELOPMENT
City Administrator Hedges prow ad back and and history concerning Cedarvale and the effects
of the realignment of the intersection dfiPedar A ue and Highway 13 on the retail access and visibility.
Community Development Director Runde reviewed•the James McComb Study and its recommendations.
He stated that the principle elements:;rsicom eid.:it thi: :.study were improved access, including a
rationalization of Silver Bell Road intersectioft'8rro•the tpotetitial:for a right in from Highway 13 to Rahn Road,
maintenance and aesthetic issues and visibility, including an overall signage plan for the area.
The Council discussed options for corrective actions at Cedarvale to enhance Its development. A
question was asked concerning the assessment of Improvements and the collection of costs for extra
services. Hohenstein indicated that a special service district:tQuld be formed to provide additional funding.
in this regard and that any improvements to the rod: 3!0ant Would be assessed to the benefitting property
owners, hopefully by prior agreement. •
•
Mayor Egan supported efforts io.•study:the feasibility of public improvements to enhance access,
' identification of public and private areas which tdquir$:additional maintenance and mowing and efforts to
identify improvements in visibility and an overall sigr'r pfan.;H @:stated that the City would have to focus on
public improvements and facilitation of visibility methods Wi k%could be considered in the context of City
standards, permits or variances. Councilmember McCrea asked If Cedarvale is willing to commit dollars.
• Hohenstein responded that the Cedarvale owners have expressed an intent to participate in investments if
there appears to be a commitment on the part of the City to substantively improve access and visibility.
•
The Council then discussed the City's:economic development master plan, including its economic
development targets and its reference to refit velopm t ::Staff indicated that the reference to depressed
areas in the redevelopment target neectei#:to be CIatii ed through the development of criteria. The Council
suggested that staff develop criteria-'focusing'oi ' physical deterioration, declining property•values,
modifications of infrastructure that affet a previo s!y dynamic area, the presence of tax appeals, and the
presence of multiple owners requiring co Q.dinatLpn:iather.tban single owners who could manage properties
to their own benefit. It was suggested t e:.pubii _:p irpo i :considering assistance in such areas would
be the effect of deterioration on the City's tax base as well as the attraction of tourist dollars and service to
the community.
Councilmember Awada stated that she would support City assistance with the visibility and access
issues, but would oppose active In volvemer .af: :City:M.the property's redevelopment or marketing. She
further encouraged the Cedarvale mercha ijigitnlze ?:cooperate in making improvements on their own.
She stated that with the opening of the Ma.: f America,Ceedarvale could become an attractive retail property
and the City should see if it would redevelop on its own ratfotthan become actively involved in the private.
sector.
•
Page 2/EAGAN SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
July 21, 1992
Counciimember McCrea asked:;# e w :an :st :experience in Edmonton at the periphery of
the West Edmonton Mall. Commuri Clog p metkt:`•:director Runkle stated that some peripheral
development had occurred, but that Cedarvale was a unique circumstance given its location and access
Issues.
The Mayor further encouraged staff to approach MnDOT, together with the Cedarvale property
owners, to discuss the Rahn Road connection. He stated that the City should not take a lead In this effort
but should provide partnership and suppor1 to property owners.
BLACKdiAWK PARK IMPROVEMENTS
Parks& Recreation Director Vraa s:presenteedithe final bid plan to the City Council for its review for
Blackhawk Park. Vraa reviewed recreational and water quality improvements anticipated in the first phase.
He stated that the project would be finar :$470,0001 f om. ie Parkslte Fund and$114,000 from a State
lock-on grant. He stated that two additii tai phEseS i>wotiid lSo be built at a subsequent time. Parks Planner
Sullivan reviewed details of the plan and indicated that the park will be usable in the fall of 1993 for nature
walks, canoe launching and other low intensity uses..Councilmember McCrea asked about operating costs.
Vraa stated that minimum mowing is the only City cost for regular maintenance of this site.
ADJOURNMENT:::
•
The meeting was adjourned by a90artr.0o4.4:0;24 p.m.
•
JDH
•
Date City Clerk
•
•
•
•
•
tb.
MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE
PAGAN,CITY COUNCIL
Eagan,Minnesota
A regular meeting of the Eagast;:pity Council was held on Tuesday, August 4, 1992, at the Eagan
Municipal Center. Present were Mayor tin and Councilmembers Wachter,Awada,.McCrea, and Pawlenty.
Also present were City Administrator Hedges, Community Development Director Dale Runkle, Director of
Public Works Tom Colbert, and City Attorney James Sheldon.
Pawlenty moved,Awada seconded,i motioti:0 approve the agenda for the August 4,1992,regular City
Council meeting as presented. Aye: 5 tfftii,: 0
In regard to the minutes of a regular meeting of the Eagan City Council on July 21, 1992,
Councilmember Pawlenty recommended that a heading be placed before Paragraph 4 on Page 3 to indicate the
item concerns Rahn Road.
In addition, Councilmember McCrea recom44444h6.following correction:
•
Page 9, Paragraph 5, Sentence 2.replace the woitk"option,"with the word, "alternate"
•
Wachter moved,McCrea seconded,a.iiiiiiiitii:04psor the minutes of the regular meeting of July 21,
1992, as amended. Aye: 5 Nay: 0 •
•
USITEKV
Licensing
.......
At this time, the City Council tOiti:06.....iiipot*itSc:iiiiiiisk a number of questions of the Department
Heads. In answer to a licensing question Oom CoitiOiitember McCrea,Chief of Police Geagan said that an
establishment employing a masseuse would pay an establishment fee, an initial investigation fee for each
masseuse, as well as a yearly renewal fceA clues**was then asked about the licensing of store managers
where beer is sold. A concern was expr40ii4.0910*FP.f,10. s.Cub Foods that rotates its managers having
to pay a license fee each time they changiCiiiiiiiiii;::44.0*an noted,however,that there are investigation
costs to the City with each change.
Hunting Permits
Discussion then took place in regard.***tiepnits in the City. Chief of Police Geagan said he had
suggested that hunting permits be limited:;•*.igiiti''iiiiii404 using only bow and arrow. When asked by
Councilmember Awada as to his reasons,.Chief Geagan cilia*iocerns about the safety of using firearms in the
City. Councilmember Wachter noted thatlhe only reason hi'Votes in favor of the special hunting permits is
because of the number of car accidents ii#Olving deer. He als04tinted out that any violations of the ordinance
would result in the termination of this OtfiiEgedg.e.foF.:eygys*:::::::".
Page 2/EAGAN CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
August 4, 1992
Before discussion of the Consent Works Colbert asked that Item K,Contract
92-09,Receive Bids/Award Contract(Grttcf;Oaks&Woodlands North 2nd Addition-Streets&Utilities)and •
Item L, Contract 92-10, Receive Bids/4i#Bids/4i# Contract (Weston Hills - Trunk Utilities) be continued to the
August 18, 1992, regular City Council meeting.
A. Personnel Items
Item 1. Clerical Technician III/F.a;tks and Ration Department--It was recommended that the hiring
of Deanna Jorgenson as a Clerical Tecnician the Parks and Recreation Department be approved
contingent upon successful completion ofte City phy,Sical examination requirement.
Item 2. Americans with Disabi '.•... . .•...• ion
It was recommended that the ADA transition plan be approved as presented.
Item 3. OSHA Bloodborne Pathogens Rule/Exposure Control Plan
It was recommended that the exposur control plan fofibibodborne pathogens be approved as presented.
B. License.Pet Shop.Wal-Mart.::.;;.:;:;:;
It was recommended that the pet shop Igznse for'the sale of fish at the Wal-Mart Store be approved
as presented.
•
C. Approve Transfer of Ownership.;Cable TV North Central
It was recommended that the transfer of ownership for Cable TV North Central be approved as
presented.
D. Receive Plans and S,pecificatio horiz•Ad�ur �estisement for Rids. Eagan City Hall Council
Chambers Alterations
•
It was recommended that the plans and spe (cations be received and advertisement for bids for the
Eagan City Hall Council Chamber alterat tits',authoid with a bid opening to be held at 11:00 a.m.on August
24, 1992.
E. Receive Plans and Specifications/Authorize Advertisement for Bids. Eagan City Hall Council
Chambers Media Equipment and Installation
It was recommended that the plans and specifications be received and advertisement for bids for the
Eagan City Hall Council Chambers media egat ipstallation authorized with a bid opening to be held
at 11:00 a.m. on August 24, 1992. •
F. 1992 Budget Adjustments
It was recommended that the ts.to.: •:199k(reneral Fund and Recycling Fund budgets be
approved. :........
Page 3/EAGAN CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
August 4, 1992
G. Approve Official Sale Rec.o44044Iiii;i4giles
It was recommended that the sale:f4ommendations for the General Obligation Improvement Refunding
Bonds, Series 1992A; the General ObligOgin Improvement Bonds, Series 1992B; and the General Obligation
Equipment Certificates of Indebtedness, Series 1992C be approved as presented.
H. Final Plat. E-Z Stop of Eagan •
• It was recommended that the f4411 plat for E-Z Stop of Eagan be approved and the Mayor and City
Clerk authorized to execute all related c10iments.
•
I. Ratification.James Bombarcktonditit* Use Permit Denial Resolution
It was recommended that the denial resQlkIti regarding the James Bombardo Conditional Use Permit
be ratified.
J. Declare Surplus Property.Authorize Sale of Storage Shed at Recycling Site
It was recommended that the storage shed at the recycling site be declared surplus property and its sale
authorized to Mr. Richard Pecar for$100.
K. Contract 92-09. Receive B4Away4 Contrct (Great Oaks & Woodlands North 2nd Addition -
Streets & Utilities) ,•-•
It was recommended that the bids be received and that.consideration of awarding Contract 92-09(Great
Oaks &Woodlands North 2nd Addition - Streets& iii1hii4Wcontinued to August 18, 1992.
L Contract 92-10. Receive Bids/Award Contract (Weston Hills -Trunk Utilities)
•
It was recommended that the bids be received and that Contract 92-10(Weston Hills-Trunk Utilities)
be continued to August 18, 1992.
..•.•.•.•...
M. Project 621 Receive Final sessmen $ ilIfOthe,Public Hearing(Manor Lake 4th Addition)
It was recommended that the fiiial.assessmeileroll for Project 621 (Manor Lake 4th Addition-Streets
& Utilities)be received and a public he#0,g sche4i40 to be held September 1, 1992.
N. Contract 92-07.Approve
It was recommended that Change Order#1 to Contract 92-07(Sealcoating)be approved and the Mayor
and City Clerk authorized to execute all related documents.
0. Stipulation of Settlement.Fran*F***!,.spent Appeal
•
It was recommended that a resolulibp adopting the stipulation of settlement for the Francis Franz appeal
.......•.•
be approved.
Pawlenty moved, Wachter seco44.*motion-ta-apriiiiiie the Consent Agenda as amended. Aye: 5
Nay: 0
•
•
Page 4/EAGAN CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
August 4, 1992
•
WASTE MANAGEMENT/GRANT AGREEMENT •
Mayor Egan introduced this itemus Waste Management,City of Eagan Grant Agreement.
McCrea moved,Pawlenty seconded,*motion to authorize execution of the resolution authorizing one
or more individuals as the authorized agents'',under the waste education grant agreement with the Minnesota
Office of Waste Management. Aye: 5 tray:', 0
s «:• :•s • •
; t
...nv.n.. :tiv?i•'•:i•:iiv::r,:.N:%:iiiY: .. ..............
Pawlenty moved, McCrea secondedi; ii st oa:to iFpproiii•a special City Council meeting for 5:00 p.m.
on September 1,1992,and a special City Council meeting for 5:30 p.m.on September 10,1992,with the primary
purpose being the 1993 Budget. Aye: 5 Nay: 0 •
FINAL ASSESSMENT REAI NG'(SADDLEHORN ADDITION)
Mayor Egan introduced this item.asi: ro.ject 619;::Final Assessment Hearing, Saddlehorn Addition -
Streetlights. It should be noted that the fnat costs: e:.less than estimated for the project and no one came
forward to address the issue.
McCrea moved, Pawlenty seconded; a motion to close the public hearing and approve the final
assessment roll for Project 619 (Saddlehom Addition - Streetlights) and authorize its certification to Dakota
County for collection. Aye: 5 Nay: 0
•
LAKEVIEW Titigt )IM .'IQNi=:;ST ETS &UTILITIES •
Mayor Egan introduced this iterii: Project..635,Lakeview Trail Addition-Streets&Utilities. Director
of Public Works Colbert said a feasibility.:report had,tien prepared in response to a petition from the developer
of the Lakeview Trail Addition. Mr. Colbert said wh enever a petition for improvements is received,City staff
reviews the comprehensive plan for other;area*I pt**.ii is:fit may be warranted. He said that in reviewing
the comprehensive plan, it was determined'that it Wouli•be'appropriate to extend the trunk water main along
Dodd Road south of Cliff Road to the Lakeview Trail Addition and it was this proposed extension of the water -
main that had prompted concerns by adjacent property owners.
Mark Hanson,of Bonestroo,Rosen;A;pd...ik 4.Associates,described the project and the proposed
improvements and then outlined the assesst io it;aca: estimated corresponding assessments.
The Mayor then opening the Fiiiiiiimaring for pubYe:&omment.
Richard Buchan, 4695 Dodd Rom said he had attent3ed the July 16 neighborhood meeting and then
met with the other residents at the end oi' ;`'' fit;$man said the neighbors found they had common
Page 5/EAGAN CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
August 4, 1992
concerns and then he read a letter prep4•iiiiand signed by the 11 residents on Dodd Road who are proposed
•to be assessed for trunk water main imptgeneAtA..(F4.04.
Bill Kuhlmeyer, 4635 Dodd Roaitiiiilleiiifiiiiiiieighbors to be unduly penalized because the
trunk water main would provide no benegfjo their properties.
Stuart Weierke,4675 Dodd Road,said there was no room for the trunk water main on the east side of
Dodd Road because of the number of other lines—gas and fiber optic—that are already in place. He asked who
would pay the extra costs of repairing the blacktop if that became necessary.
Director of Public Works Colbegiininted out that once detailed plans are prepared and there is a need
to relocate the water line,the costs woug ;iome frOitiii0e water main trunk fund. In addition, any restoration
to Dodd Road would be born by that furik Mr.We001ce then asked whether the road would be torn up again
when sanitary sewer is put in. Mr.Colbeii4aid the Cy has no plans to install sanitary sewer in that area unless
there is a problem with septic system failige.or.:0:51r40:ANW4tc.4:0Y.further development by the property owners,
otherwise the improvement would not b0:**14.:**4:0Clii answer to a question from Councilmember
McCrea,Director of Public Works Colbert inilicatedliere would be no major cost savings if water and sanitary
sewer were installed at the same time.
A question arose as to whether the installation of a water main would result in insurance savings. Mr.
Buchan said he had called his insurance agent and the agent 44;indicated the location of the fire station was
the main point not the placement of a fire hydrant st?..:tIyek:.:*ould be no change in insurance Premiums.
Director of Public Works Colbert said the main.ben**;Oie-Viater main is a safe, dependable,water supply.
He added that connection to City water eRni$:*:;iiiiiiiialgely after installation or at a later date. He said that
if the connection is made now,the costs 6f:bringing water tti.:the property could be included with the assessments
and payment spread over a number of years.:.:)'i*elp*.,if property owners wait, any costs such as jacking
under the road or surface restoration will be in iddiii***:connection charges. Mr.Colbert then explained
the importance of completing the water main loop. Aili.:404:aow, there is only one feed for water service
in the Manor Lake/Lakeview Trails/Weston Hills areas and a iiiter main break could disrupt service to 700+
homes. The City would prefer two feeds to mitigate any interruption of service.
Discussion then turned to the assessments and Councilmember Pawlenty asked if it would be feasible
for the City to do additional analysis as to whether the assessments could be sustained. Director of Public Works
Colbert said that because of the costs iny4nlii4:4e y?nul :ppftfer to pick representative properties for the
appraisals.
It was generally agreed that looping of the water main is necessary and cancelling a half million dollar
project because of$36,000 in assessmen4Ail not seei*appropriate. It was then suggested that the homeowners
pay a portion of their assessments with ili.i•,;Temkin.40'.being::eagied by the City until such time as they sell or
develop their properties. Mayor Egan vi thifan agreement was to be worked out, it would
require unanimity among the property owners.
Councilmember Pawlenty reminded the audience that the City Council was not authorizing. the
assessment roll but only considering approval of the.roject. He said,however,there would be an opportunity
to reach a compromise between now and tllei:441:**Si*nt hearing with direction from the City Council as
to the methodology. Mayor Egan added hat separate the two issues: the feasibility of the •
project and how to finance it
After further discussion, McCrWilnoved,Awada secO0ed, a motion to close the public hearing and
approve Project 635 (Lakeview Trails AO4ion.:::.44,94*:400es) and authorize the preparation of detailed
plans and specifications provided that Oftii:40.54fii*OlgigiA is noted as objecting to the assessments and
. ------- .
0
_,..._
Page 6/EAGAN CITY COUNCIL MINUTES . J
August 4, 1992 ......
.........
•:•:•:•:•.
that Staff continue to work with the pro*O owners exploring all alternatives in order to reach an agreement
for Council's consideration. Aye: 5 Nar..0. . ... .
•!::.....::::•::::::::::::::•::::::::::::.::::::::::::::':'
The property owners then askediligi:iiiiiiilini::liiiiiiiiligreement be set by the Council. After some
discussion, it was determined that an agrgent will be returned to the Council for their consideration at the
October 8, 1992,regular City Council mOi•ig.
litirOMME:
HUNTING PERMIT ISSUANCE
Mayor Egan introduced this iteni.:,4'.....the iss*§.e. of hunting permits in the City of Eagan. He explained
that the topic had been explored earlier*#lie men*to permit discussion with the Chief of Police and that
Jon Parker of the Minnesota Department:of Naturat.gesources was now present to answer questions.
Mr.Parker distributed informati44:(1*444i.ifOgiliiig deer populations and the results of the last
deer survey. In answer to a question, Mi:Iileiiiiiiii6rd'itig no evidence that the City's present hunting
policy presented any problems and said he would not recommend that it be made more restrictive. The Council
generally agreed that the present policy remain in effect;however,some reservations were expressed regarding
the use of firearms in the City and will continue to be handled on a case by case basis.
HUNTING FER.141t$
...:•:•:•:•:•.:.:.:.:.:.:.%
.....:.:::::::::::•:•:•::::.:.'•
Mayor Egan introduced this itetn.aal*Oing.iiiii*applications.
......
:•:•:.
Pawlenty moved,Awada seconded,:*itiOicm.to approve applications for Larry Becker,Shawn Becker,
Richard Maurer,Rebecca Maurer and Fran litiiiiiiiPlii0: pwlkunting of deer at locations referenced on their
applications. Aye: 5 Nay: 0 .••••:•:;:::::::::::::::::•:
- .
PICCOLO'S ON-SALE BEER LICENSE
Mayor Egan introduced this item as a license for on-sale,non-intoxicating beer for Piccolo's/Wallace
J. Boudreau, 4162 Pilot Knob Road.
....: i::::::::.:;:.: ..:.:.::::•:•:•:•:ii
McCrea moved, Awada secondek.*:iikiii.on 0::i.aliiiiiii8 an on-sale, non-intoxicating beer license for
Piccolo's Pizza located at 4162 Pilot Knob gred in:Ifiliiiip Shopping Center. Aye: 4 Nay 1 (Pawlenty)
.•-.••
• •
.... ..
::::• . —:•••:.....SROSS.--.....•
VARIANCES/RldtAidiaiNiii*/iEY'S 1ST ADDITION
•
Mayor Egan introduced this item as a variance for Richard Skinn, of 20' to the rear yard setback
requirement and a variance of 50'to the required 100' setback from property zoned agricultural; a variance of
7'to the required 20' side yard setback;and a variance to the curb and gutter and paving requirements for Lot
1, Block 2, Halley's 1st Addition, located inSJAW4Akif:;Section 36. Director of Community Development •
Runkle explained the application and its kikiii'lCiiiIi4 noted that the property is"Comp Guided" as
single-family, however, is presently zone0:9H.:(Light Indusiiiil).:i.
.•:•::::
Richard Skinn,the applicant,saf.cl: . business is expantling thus necessitating a larger building. He said
he had done some landscaping to screen:40....uilding t54:00.44(at he would not need the variances if he could
avoid putting in a drain field. When as44.:• 00 iiiiiNiii:40 to his neighbors about his plans,Mr.Skinn
Ili
• .
Page 7/EAGAN CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
August 4, 1992
said his only neighbor is Earl Marotzke tiai#'Mr.Marotzke had no objections. Mr.Marotzke was present and
indicated his agreement. Mayor Egan told Mr. Skinn that he understood Mr. Skinn's request for setback
variances, but asked why he wished a var ace: i the:ON4Oiter and paving requirements. Mr. Skinn said
the remainder of the area is gravel and saiel:lam iiui lid:bi :Ii pgy:to pave the parking lot and put in curb and
gutter when the rest of his neighbors
•
City Administrator Hedges indicated that staff had discussed the conflict between the Comprehensive
Guide Plan and the zoning of the property and it was their opinion that either the area should develop as an
industrial park or remain as a"holding"zoning;however,if it was to be an industrial park,it should have paving,
curb and gutter installed.
Councilmember McCrea asked I :Skinn hiong he'd owned the property and he indicated 4 months.
She asked if he had purchased the propel,contingent on being able to construct this building on the property
and he said he had not
After further discussion, Mayor:. :..aapil::.h c, 9:-.mod no hardship to justify these variances.
Councilmember Pawlenty said he would pt'esitriie tai vvtieri It+r:Sinn bought the property he realized what the
setbacks were and asked what had ch ang ed in
the pas t 120 days. Mr.Skinn
said the property was advertised as
a one-acre lot but he now realizes it is smaller than he anticipated.
•
Councilmember Pawlenty summarized the issues but indicated the real question is what the City wants
the property to become. Councilmember McCrea said that:.as It stands today,the applicant could build a pole
barn on the property without a variance. She suggest 4 that raitdier than deny the application,a continuance be
granted so that Council could walk the
•
Pawlenty moved,McCrea seconded,:.a.:motion to•continue to the August 18,1992,regular City Council
meeting a variance for Richard Skinn, of 20'to thi . ::yard;setback requirement and a variance of 50'to the
required 100' setback from property zoned agricultural,:a:.•*reface of 7' to the required 20' side yard setback;
and a variance to the curb and gutter and paving requirement5:far Lot 1,Block 2,Halley's 1st Addition,located
in the SE 1/4 of Section 36. Aye: 5 Nay: 0
•
SPECIAL USE PERMIT/STEININGER CONSTRUCTION
•
Mayor Egan introduced this item as.a special use permit.for Steininger Construction,to allow continued
concrete recycling in a Light Industrial(iI)'ung,i lstrict:: ::a;portion of Parcel 10-01300-012-26,located in the
NW 1/4 of Section 13. Director of Community Devek*iment Runkle said that a special use permit had been
granted to the applicant subject to annuial:'review. Hie said no negative comments had been received from the
surrounding properties.
•
Councilmember Wachter askeciii :..:•cs oeS;ab44:the removal of gravel from the property. The
applicant said they were removing gravel from the Gopher smelting property and Steve Bryant of West
Publishing said they were removing gravel from their property as well. Mr. Bryant went on to say that the
applicant was doing a fine job and West Publishing had no objections to the renewal of their application. •
Pawlenty moved, Wachter seconded:::0:: .;to approve a•special use permit for Steininger
Construction to allow continued concrete r4q ig in ibghL: dustrial zoning district on a portion of parcel 10-
01300-012-26 and subject to the following itibditions:
1. Dust control procedures shy}:be utilized.
2. Hours of operation shall be: : i . :4.:: i1 Q0 p.m.,Monday through Saturday.
Page 8/EAGAN CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
August 4, 1992
3. The operation-shall be subject,.t an,at al..re icw: If renewal is denied, the applicant will be
provided with a six-month notice for ter mat i;:;
Aye: 5 Nay: 0
GRADING/EXCAVATION PERMIT/WEST PUBLISHING
Mayor Egan introduced this item as a Grading/Excavation Permit for West Publishing, for
approximately 12 acres on Lot 1, West Pub .'.: 2nd Addition, and Lot 1, Block 1, Lembke 1st Addition,
located along the north side of Wescott) tiad in the SE 1/4 of Section 13. City Administrator Hedges said the•
application had been reviewed by the " 4, PI441ng Commission at their July 28 meeting and they had
recommended approval subject to two conditions. Iti sorer to a question from Councilmember Pawlenty,Steve
Bryant of West Publishing said an inventcsrl oo trees:gipuld be performed and those trees that can be moved will
be.
McCrea moved, Wachter seconded,la motion to app'r'ove a grading permit for West Publishing for
approximately 12 acres on Lot 1, West Publishing 2nd Addition, and Lot 1, Block 1, Lembke 1st Addition,
located on the north side of Wescott Road aid subject to the following conditions:
1. All current driveways along Wescott Road,except for.the existing fire lane access,shall be removed
and the curb cuts shall be replaced with straight curb.
. . 2. The existing wells and septic.;Syi teias: ll be abandoned in accordance with City and County
requirements. :.••
Aye: 5 Nay: 0
PRELIMINARY PLAT/BUR OAR HILLS 3RD ADDITION
Mayor Egan introduced this item a a preliminary plat for Bur Oak Hills 3rd Addition/Shamrock
Development, consisting of two lots on approximately 2.6 previously zoned R-1 (Single Family) acres located
along Rolling Hills Drive in the NE 1/4 of Section 12. City Administrator Hedges said the application had been •
reviewed by the Advisory Planning Commassi0at their Ju1y.;3,8 meeting and they had recommended approval.
After brief discussion, Pawlenty n t ed,W*ehter seconded, a motion to approve the preliminary plat
for Bur Oak Hills 3rd Addition/Shamrock,Development,consisting of two lots on approximately 2.6 previously
zoned R-1 (Single-Family) acres located::pi Rolling; is Drive and subject to the following conditions:•
1. These standard conditions of:p fii ai:e :aiilojit d by Council action on July 10, 1990,shall be
complied with:
Al, Bi,B3, Cl,C2,C5,DI,El,Fl,IG1,and HI.
2. A snow fence shall be erected tp'xeitc the: togs of trees to be saved.
3. Sanitary sewer and water servk will need to be'pi`�vided to the proposed lots and this will require
the rremoval and replacement of the cif-de= c.
'''''' that is plugged on the north side of the tee
4. The existing 6"X6"water maxi:t •in•R«liin�g.I' : 'e P u88
shall be removed and replaced with a 6":.;:;.:.:::':Er:.::
•
Page 9/EAGAN CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
August 4, 1992
5. The final plat shall provide a' O wide easement along the common lot line in between Lots 1 and
2 to provide for the storm sewer run-off frog p the,.cyl-de-sac to•Highway 55.
Aye: 5 Nay: 0
COMPREHENSIVE Glii PLAN AMENDMENT/PRELIMINARY PLAT
WILSON ADDITION
Mayor Egan introduced this item as a preliminary plat for the Wilson Addition/Mary Ann Wilson,
consisting of four lots on approximately 4.6 previously-zoned,R-1(Single Family) acres located along the west
side of Blackhawk Road in the East 1/2 ob$ection 17. City Administrator Hedges said the application had been
reviewed by the Advisory Planning Comiigsion at tii July 28 meeting and they had recommended approval.
Director of Community Development Ruhicle described the application and its location.
Mary Ann Wilson, the applicant.retad..a..lettcr.of•.obkction to Condition #8 of the preliminary plat
approval. In answer to a question, Director: f:# ibl :Wo?cs': bert said the condition is one that has been
imposed in the past with assessments being 'of txud'isiithobt objection at the time of assessment. Some
members of the Council indicated they were uncomfortable with the condition and indicated they would not
support it.
McCrea moved,Awada seconded,a motion to approve a,comprehensive guide plan amendment for the
Wilson Addition/Mary Ann Wilson of approximately 4.6 D•ffi: oced Residential)Acres to D-I(Single-Family).
Aye: 5 Nay: 0
•
McCrea moved, Awada second& a'motion to *pprove a preliminary plat consisting of four lots on •
previously zoned R-1 (Single Family) property:located.along the west side of Blackhawk Road and subject to
all conditions except Condition #8:
•
1. These standard conditions of plat approval as adoTited by Council action on July 10, 1990,shall be
complied with:
•
Al, B1,B2, B3, Cl, C2,D1,El, Fl, G1, and H1
2. Tree protection during site grading:shall include:•enctlosing trees to be saved with snow fencing or
other suitable material.
3. A 40' half right-of-way shall be dedicated Blackhawk Road.
4. Individual driveway trunarot4.#wll;be'ieppste:.for each of the three newly created lots.
5. All required permanent and temporary construction easements for the sanitary sewer shall be
dedicated on the plat or acquired by deed conveyance prior to final plat approval.
6. The driveway connections at Blackhawk Road will require culverts to convey the drainage along the
ditch system of Blackhawk Road.
7. This development shall extez4 tiitary sewer to'ii I':four lots.
..• _
mh.
Page 10/EAGAN CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
August 4, 1992
Aye: 4 Nay: 1 (Wachter)
Director of Public Works Colbeti:::44..... ii.....a. P:.:ii::...44....::.iiii4c:.. r of hearing/objection"condition should be
required for similar developments in the tiiiiii:Ciiiiriiiiiiitier Awada indicated that it should be included
and the Council would decide whether itt:Aol it was appropriate on a case by case basis.
.:.:.:.:.
:.:.:.:.:
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT/OUTDOOR STORAGE
TOM THUMB/YANKEE SQUARE
Mayor Egan introduced this item as*conditional use permit for Tom Thumb,to allow outdoor storage
in a commercial zoning district on Lot 4...Block 1, Bicentennial 1st Addition, located along the south side of
Yankee Doodle Road in the NE 1/4 of$fdion 16 City Administrator Hedges said the application had been
reviewed by the Advisory Planning Comn4lon at th0:::July ZS meeting and they had recommended denial. Mr.
Hedges said that Item G of New BusiO4S Was al.4:0 request for outside storage by Tom Thumb but at a
different location. He recommended that:diseussipuip.yolyet0h.*pplications but that action be taken separately.
. .................•.•...•.•.••••
Director of Community Developme4RunIde'provided background on the item and indicated that the
Advisory Planning Commission had had difficulty interpreting the ordinance.
1
Tim Wonzel, representing Tom Thunb, said that since he had been involved in drafting the outside
storage ordinance,he believed their applicatioin was in compliance. He then addressed each objection the APC
cited in denying the application. Director of Commuuity:pe*hOpment Runkle said his interpretation of the
ordinance was the same as Mr. Wonzel's. M*y..9c;::.r.i.4.:::iiiitied that obviously some confusion about the
. interpretation of the ordinance still existed:::;:':::::::::::.::::::::....
.::::.:.... .:.:.: .
,...
Councilmember Pawlenty asked mr.:No#741:wiiiiiier he believed 2x4's were a suitable enclosure next
to a brick building. Mr. Wonzel said that a,Iiiiii:04$0::wptild be too difficult to work with and that an
enclosure of either wood or metal could be constructed fii:**etitletically pleasing. Councilmember Pawlenty
said it appeared that stores were using outside storage as additional retail space.
After much discussion on the appropriateness of various materials for the enclosure and what could
conceivably be appropriate for outside storage,it was recommended that perhaps the decision should be one of
health, safety and welfare. Councilmember McCrea suggested that perhaps exceptions to the restrictions on
outside storage could occur when the producc3 lquestion..(i;e4:ptopane or firewood)affected health and safety
or the health and safety aspects of other.:..0.i.t,iiiii:iii4);:iiiditliiii;.:she said it seemed more logical to have self-
contained storage of propane, for instance.,at a fre0.iiiiiding building rather than at a strip mall.
..... .• ...
.... .,.....
....
Mr.Wonzel said it is customary fOi:onvenie*stores to have ice chests outside. He said he had pulled
all outside storage June 1 but other coi.:tye--**ifug• agl*• were not notified until 6-7 weeks later and they were
permitted to keep their outside storage iitaltraiiiiii:Xiiiiiiiiiiiii0Mber Awada said she was willing to extend the
outside storage grace period three months while action was taken to clarify the ordinance. .
Awada moved,McCrea seconded,a motion to continue to the November 5, 1992,regular City Council
meeting consideration of a conditional use permit for outdoor storage for the Tom Thumb Store located on Lot
1,Block 1, Bicentennial 1st Addition, at the.:Y#4:44re.Shopping Center and that no enforcement of the
outdoor storage ordinance take place unti14:00ifiaiiiiii:g*ordinance is completed. Aye; 5 Nay: 0 •
Councilmember Pawlenty suggeglad staff look atkether a designated amount of area should be
that
permitted for outside storage without regard to product and with no additional space permitted.
....:.:.:........................:........:::::::::
Page 11/EAGAN CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
August 4, 1992
CONDITION4:4JSE PERMIT/OUTDOOR STORAGE
. TOM.TJIUMBJ$.L.ACK HAWK PLAZA
Mayor Egan introduced this item' .s'a'iCtiiiiL`ti�ntl fileitimit for Tom Thumb,to allow outdoor storage
in a commercial zoning district on Lots 4.04:5,Block 1,Blackhawk Plaza Addition,located along the north side
of Diffley Road in the SE 1/4 of Section,
Awada moved,McCrea seconded,a motion to continue to the November 5, 1992,regular City Council
meeting consideration of a conditional use permit to allow outdoor storage in a commercial zoning district on
Lots 4 and 5,Block 1,Blackhawk Plaza Addition,and that no enforcement of the outdoor storage ordinance take
place until a clarification of the ordinan4 :3s completed Aye: 5 Nay. 0
APPROVE PLAN AUTHOR.[ E ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS
LA t d :1•44:•ADDITION
Mayor Egan introduced this item as Contract 92-11,Approve Plans/Authorize Advertisement for Bids
(Lakeview Trails - Streets & Utilities).
Egan moved, Wachter seconded, a motion to approve plans for Contract 92-11 (Lakeview Trails
Addition-Streets&Utilities)and authorize the advertisemeitt:4 a bid opening to be held at 10:30 a.m.,August
28, 1992.
,.#$> > FND
CONTRACT 924$0O4:CEDE.6TH ADDITION
MARY,MOTHER OF THE C101 STORM SEWER
Mayor Egan introduced this item as Contract 92-05,Approve Change Order#1(Oak Cliff 6th Addition
- Mary, Mother of the Church Storm Sewer).
Wachter moved,Awada seconded,a motion to approve Change Order#1 to Contract 92-05(Oak Cliff
6th Addition-Mary,Mother of the Churcc:§Lt%i :Sewer),ia:th:amount of$8,957.50 and authorize the Mayor
and City Clerk to execute all related doctiit eiits ye;:::S:::Nay:::0
CONTRACT SOVI,EaridtoN POINT 6TH ADDITION
:'u�TREET,g: UTILITIES
Mayor Egan introduced this iteii#'ii8'Coiiti t t e t: Wq igton Pointe 6th Addition-Streets&Utilities,
Acknowledge Completion/Authorize City Maintenance.
Awada moved, Egan seconded, a motion to acknowledge completion and authorize perpetual
maintenance for Project 89-V,Lexington Pointe 6th Addition-Streets&Utilities,subject to warranty provisions.
Aye: 5 Nay 0
•
PROJECT 9QU/COVENTRY PP S 3RD ADDITION
. STREETS & UTIrtniES
Mayor Egan introduced this item b►s.p.rpjget.90-;A8:C.4.entry Pass 3rd Addition- Streets& Utilities,
Acknowledge Completion/Authorize Cii; ?Caiiltt ::
•
Page 12/EAGAN CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
August 4, 1992
Awada moved, Wachter secon&i3;:a motion to acknowledge completion and authorize perpetual
maintenance for Project 90-AA,Coventry,.ii' ;3Fd•M.dclitioa•-Streets&Utilities,subject to warranty provisions.
Aye: 5 Nay: 0 .....•...••• : •
+s•:t .:tnnn>.••:tt::.::.c.:a:' : +o:::t•::;:::tr.::k::
Sign Task Force Meeting
The first Sign Task Force meeting is scheduled for August 5, 1992,from 4:00 p.m.-6:00 p.m.
:::g§mpostiNgRecyrling Site
City Administrator Hedges said�tba4 bean an agreement had yet to be reached between Dakota
County and the vendor on the Gopher Smelting rtcycling site, Dakota County had asked that the Municipal
Center compost/recycling site be allowecito.r..alaist.ip•operatios through the end of 1992 with relocation to take
place before the season begins in 1991 :T1i.e:00.:040;.:.*.*:.to the County's request.
era Open House
City Administrator Hedges advised a City Council that an open house had been scheduled by the
Metropolitan Waste Control Commission fo the Seneca Treatment Plant on October 8. The MWCC will be
conducting tours and especially of N-Viro fa •'ties.
.4 1&:+4445.VUdiniark Court
Councilmember Wachter said he hatiliOnstpatactia by residents,David Albee and Dennis Nelson,4441
and 4445 Vildmark Court, respectively, with a claim t#iat.sdtatiQn fences had not been installed between their
properties and a home under construction in Ithe Wilderi ess:Ptituls Addition,leading to soil washing onto their
properties. After discussion,it was agreed that this was a dispute between the builder and the property owners
and staff was advised that the City Council Would not authorize any funding for clean up of erosion damage.
Variance
Councilmember Pawlenty said he. : i. contact 4.by a resident regarding a variance that had been
issued but never put into use because the4 tijierty'was; tbeftire the home was built. The question had arisen
as to whether the new owner could use tiir:varranci$:* n though the particulars of the home,its placement on
the lot,etc., are not the same as on the pr.iginal application. City Attorney Sheldon said variances typically run
with the land dependent upon certain cone hitions bei fig present. He said his office would investigate.
::::14 itif i4 t0oird
Councilmember Awada expressed ceolcems about the Mosquito Control Board and its effectiveness and
asked if the City Council had any interest in!looking at the issue. City Administrator Hedges suggested it may
be worthwhile to involve the AMM and the Ciity, ouncil agreed.
uilding Sons B orAtOon Conference .
McCrea moved, Egan seconded, a motion to appit ve Councilmember Wachter's attendance at a
conference entitled,"Building Coalitions:Aor ction,"hosted by*Minnesota Lakes Association in Bloomington,
October 2 and 3, 1992. Aye: 4 Nay: Q:: :: :: a ei)::
•
i
_
Page 13/EAGAN CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
August 4, 1992
. .
Wachter moved,Egan secondedAijitiiitk;041#0*t1i0:..checklist dated August 4,1992,in the amount
of$712,929.51. Aye: 5 Nay: 0
EXECOOE SESSION/ADJOURNMENT •
The City Council adjourned the regular meeting to an executive session to consider pending litigation
at 10:50 p.m. Those in attendance were Mayor Egan,Councilmembers Awada,McCrea,Pawlenty and Wachter,
City Administrator Hedges, Director of Public Works Colbert, and City Attorneys Sheldon and Wilcox. The
executive session was adjourned at apprbi*ately 11:24 p.m.
•••••'
ICF
• OF EAGAN
.....•.•
•*E:
City Clerk
lf you need the minutes in an alternative fonn such as luge*Okbfrdlk,audio tape,eta,please contact the City
of Eagan, .3830 Pilot Knob Roa4 Eagan,MN .ssm:( 1li6g1460t4 (TDD phone: (612)454-8535).
. ••••
•
••"••
•...•.....•
• •
• •
•••:.:•:•::::.
••::::::•:•
•
•
•
EXHIBIT A
July 18, 1992
TO: MAYOR THOMAS EGAN'
City of Eagan
PATRICIA AWADA
PAMELA McCREA
TIM PAWLENTY
THEODORE WACHTER
Council Members
THOMAS HEDGES
City Administrator
FROM: PROPERTY OWNER AFFECTED BY WATER MAIN PROJECT 635
(Signatures attached)
PROPERTY OWNERS, WATER MAIN ASSESSMENT
DODD ROAD PROJECT 635
1.0 The property owners affected by the subject water main project recognize the benefits
to be gained by running the 8" water main as described in the project to complete a loop
through the Manor Lake and Lakeview Trail Addition projects; however, the property
owners assessed for this project can see no benefits to be gained by installing this 8"
water main as described in the engineering report in project 635. For this reason the
property owners affected are requesting that the City of Eagan Council take either of two
courses of action -- as follows:
1) Reject the water wain project in its entirety or;
2) Amend the project to relieve the subject property owners of all financial
support,and transfer the$35,135 assessment to the property owners to the
owners who will benefit from the project, i.e., Manor Lake and Lakeview
Trail Additions. Furthermore, the City of Eagan, must guarantee that the
blacktop surface of Dodd Road must be repaired to its condition as it was
before the damage had occurred from the construction trucks traveling
Dodd Road to both Lakeview and Manor Lakevprojects and what might
result from the installation of the 8" water main along the 2,290 front feet
of Dodd Road.
2.0 The reasons for requesting this course of action from the City Council are as follows:
2.1 In signing this l tter, the property owners state and certify that in no
manner or way did they make an indication that might be construed or
taken as a request for City of Eagan water service.
Project 635:
Page 2
2.2 By signing this letter, the affected property owner declares and certifies
that they have no need, nor can see any reason for connecting to this
subject 8" main in the foreseeable future.
2.3 The financial burden resulting from adding the assessment to the already
high tax structure would be difficult to bear. Using.the figures on page
23, Appendix B, and using 8% simple interest, the average property
owner would have $429 added to his taxes for the first year. The worst
case (parcel 50-25) would have $900 added the first year to his taxes --
all this with no resultant benefits, plus putting up with the construction
traffic, noise, people and equipment involved in working on the two
developments.
2.4 WELL FAILURE - always a possibility; however, even the worse case
failure requiring a re-do -- the cost of the re-do plus the cost of capping
the well would probably be less than that of connecting to the new main.
Furthermore -- no water bills or added taxes to pay.
2.5 BLACKTOP SURVIVAL: Can the 2" surface paid for by subject
landowners survive the added load of the construction vehicles and pre-
mix concrete trucks and the heavy equipment loads placed on it by laying
the 8" main? A map displayed during the July 16th meeting showed Dodd
Road as the construction entrance. Added to this is the high probability
that peak construction could occur during the spring thaw when this type
of road is usually limited to a 4 ton per axle limit.
IN CONCLUSION: We, the property owners who have signed this document, hereby certify
that we have had in our possession a copy of this document at least three (3) days before
signing. We further certify that we have carefully studied it and are in total agreement with all
parts of the document including the request to the City Council of Eagan to either deny the
project or modify it as specified in paragraph one (1).
FINALLY, we as a group thank the Mayor and Council for their attention and cooperation. We
thank the City of Eagan Engineering staff for their cooperation and conducting the informal
meeting of July 16, 1992 at the City Hall where this project was reviewed in detail.
•
t
SIGNATURE LIST OF PROPERTY OWNERS
AFFECTED BY WATER MAIN PROJECT 635
Property I.D. Name and Addross
028-25 Weierke Trenching&Excavating _
660 Cliff Road, Ewan, MN 55123 •
./7.e.t.A.ej A #14V:44.,..
027-25 Ronald D. & Patricia J. Johnson
4625 Dodd Road, Eagan, MN 55123
?".,..-1/ Sidt4A4Aft 7-.Tele.
-etic,:„.. , 7-. t-902.4Q,7
030-25 Weierke Trenching&Excavating Co.
660 Cliff Road, Eagan, MN 55123
144'1 :g " A
....j. -04r.4,P, Isr...t,,t!.--- -4
010-26 William J. &Janet Kuhlmeyer
463 Dodd Road, . Ian, MN 55123 .sl./i'
N$)XøU 'r4 10
2
..
040-25 David T. & Sondra Forsman
4640 Dodd Road, Eagan, MN
jsee attached)
020-26 Ronald L. &Donna M. Rosa
4665 Dodd Road, Eagan, MN 55123
k 0 . mac,
/(2 t-tzet. , ./'el--Cer.../
-.4, ...,
•
Property I.D. Name and Add c
050-25 Dale F. &Dorothy A. Tessmer
4560 Dodd Road, Eagan, MN 55123
ANIL
•
030-26 Stuart& Mary Jane Weierke
4675 Dodd Road, Eagan, MN 55123
..� �✓ '
t(-
012-28 Richard J. & Ethel Buchan
4695 Dodd Road, Eagan, M N 55123
r (J)
sra_
011-28 Robert J. & Diane Hawkins
4711 Dodd Road, Eagan, MN 55123
--z• AS . 7/71 1Z--
• 20 9a
•
Project 6?5: Page
including the request to t?.e City Council of Eagan to it
the pyoject or :;odif— it s s,E.��l if: i eg G==.s,r.ph one )
.777.M-:.L°, k-e as a' g:"oup th=; the !k- a;�
J-or Council for their attention ad ret'
cooper t, o_..
we ti.ank the City of Eager -•`gineer;ng staff for their cooperRt_on a.
conducting the Informal meeting of 16, 1992 at the City 11 where this
project was reviewed in detail.