Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
03/10/2015 - Airport Relations Commission
AGENDA EAGAN AIRPORT RELATIONS COMMISSION EAGAN MUNICIPAL CENTER — COUNCIL CHAMBERS MARCH 10, 2015 7:00 PM I. ROLL CALL AND AGENDA ADOPTION II. APPROVAL OF MINUTES III. VISITORS TO BE HEARD IV. GUEST SPEAKER V. OLD BUSINESS A. Communications Update B. MAC Monthly Reports VI. NEW BUSINESS A. 2014 Actual Noise Contour Report VII. STAFF /COMMISSIONER REPORT A. Thanks to Outgoing Commissioners/Recruitment of New Commissioners B. Summer / Fall ARC Meeting Schedule VIII. ROUNDTABLE IX. ADJOURNMENT X. CLOSED SESSION TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT. THE EAGAN AIRPORT RELATIONS COMMISSION DIANNE MILLER, ASSISTANT CITY ADMINISTRATOR MARCH 2, 2015 AIRPORT RELATIONS COMMISSION MEETING /TUESDAY, MARCH 10, 2015 The Eagan Airport Relations Commission will meet on Tuesday, March 10 at 7 p.m. in the City Council Chambers. To ensure a quorum is present, please contact Executive Assistant Cheryl Stevenson at (651) 675 -5005 or cstevenson @citvofeagan.com if you are unable to attend the meeting. I. ROLL CALL AND ADOPTION OF THE AGENDA The agenda, as presented or modified, is in order for adoption by the Commission. The Commission had hoped to have a speaker at the March meeting on the topic of aviation engineering. While City staff was able to secure a speaker from Delta, due to scheduling conflicts, he is not available for the March meeting. Rather, Mr. Brown, an aviation engineer who serves as the Manager of Advanced Development in the Aircraft Performance and Engineering Division, will speak to the ARC (via Skype) at the September 8, 2015 ARC meeting. II. APPROVAL OF MINUTES The minutes of January 13, 2015 Airport Relations Commission meeting are enclosed on pages through . These minutes, as presented or modified, are in order for adoption by the Commission. III. VISITORS TO BE HEARD The Eagan City Council and its Commissions set aside up to ten minutes at the beginning of public meetings to permit visitors to address items of interest that are not addressed on the regular agenda. Items that will take more than ten minutes or that require specific action can be scheduled for a future meeting agenda. IV. GUEST SPEAKER Newly appointed MAC Commissioner, Ibrahim Mohamed, has been invited to attend the March 10 ARC meeting in hopes that he can introduce himself to the Commission. Mr. Mohamed was appointed to a 4 -year term on the MAC on February 9, 2015 by Governor Dayton to represent District H (Dakota AIRPORT RELATIONS COMMISSION MEETING /TUESDAY, MARCH 10, 2015 Page 2 County). He replaces former MAC Commissioner Tammy Mencel as Eagan's representative. At the time the packet was prepared, Mr. Mohamed had not yet confirmed his attendance on the 10tH V. OLD BUSINESS A. Communications Update — It is the practice of the Airport Relations Commission to discuss their communication initiatives each month, which include articles in the Experience Eagan Newsletter, as well as stories aired on the City's local access cable channels. The Commission is welcome at this time to make additional suggestions for communication initiatives regarding airport issues. Be MAC Monthly Reports — Enclosed on pages through is the January 2015 Technical Advisor's Report. Enclosed on pages through January 2015 Eagan /Mendota Heights Corridor Analysis. Enclosed on pages through is the January 2015 Runway 17 Departure Analysis Report. Enclosed on pages though is the January 2015 Crossing -in- the - Corridor Analysis. The November reports are the most current reports available on the MAC website. To access the reports electronically, go to http: / /www.macnoise.com /tools- reports /monthly- operations - reports. VI. NEW BUSINESS A. 2014 Actual Noise Contour Report— Enclosed on pages through is the 2014 Annual Noise Contour Analysis, comparing the 2014 actual noise contour with the 2007 forecasted noise contour. This annual analysis is developed by the MAC in compliance with the terms of the Consent Decree that was approved October 19, 2007, settling noise litigation at MSP. The noise program that resulted from the legal settlement has now been complete. An amendment to the consent decree was made in 2013 stating a home can qualify for mitigation if the annual actual noise contour report shows a home falls within the 60 -64DNL for three consecutive years and did not previously receive mitigation. The level of mitigation provided would be consistent with the mitigation offered under the original consent decree. Per the 2014 report, there are homes in Minneapolis that are now located in the 60 -64 DNL contours and thus have qualified for the first of three years necessary before mitigation would be provided. There are no homes in Eagan that meet the eligibility criteria for consideration of additional mitigation. VII. STAFF / COMMISSIONER REPORT A. Thanks to Outgoing Commissioners /Recruitment of New Commissioners —Four Commissioners have terms expiring in April 2015, and two of those commissioners have expressed their intent to retire from the Commission. Commissioner Aliets and Beseke have reached their term limit on the Commission and thus will be stepping down. Our thanks to their ten years and nine years of respective service on the Commission! Enclosed on page is an ARC roster showing Commissioner's current terms. The City is currently accepting applications for all advisory commissions. Those interested in learning more about the opportunity can do so at: AIRPORT RELATIONS COMMISSION MEETING /TUESDAY, MARCH 10, 2015 Page 3 htt www,cit ofea an.com index. h about -ea an commissions. The deadline to apply for March 20. appointment to a commission in 2015 is B. Summer /Fall ARC Meeting Schedule —The Commission is scheduled to meet again on Tuesday, May 12 at 7 p.m. The May meeting will be a joint meeting with the Airport Relations Commission from Mendota Heights. Jeff Hamiel, Executive Director of the MAC, will present his annual "State of the Airport" address. The ARC's summer meeting is scheduled for Tuesday, July 14 and is typically a workshop to prepare the work plan for the coming year (2015- 2016). The ARC is tentatively scheduled to meet with the City Council in a joint meeting on Tuesday, September 8 to present the Commission's proposed work plan. The ARC would then reconvene for its regular meeting at 7pm on September 8, at which time, Ray Brown, Aviation Engineer for Delta, will address the Commission. VIII. ROUNDTABLE Per the request of the Commission, this agenda item has been added so that Commissioners have the opportunity to ask questions or make requests for future agenda items. IX. ADJOURNMENT Per the request of the Commission, the Eagan ARC meetings will go no later than 8 :30 p.m. unless agreed upon by the Commission. X. CLOSED SESSION Following adjournment, Police Chief Jim McDonald will briefly provide emergency preparedness training to the ARC. /s /Dianne E. Miller Assistant City Administrator MINUTES OF THE EAGAN AIRPORT RELATIONS COMMISSION MEETING JANUARY 13, 2015 A meeting of the Eagan Airport Relations Commission was held on Tuesday, January 13, 2015 at 7:00 p.m. Those present were Curtis Aljets, Steve Beseke, Charles Thorkildson, Carol Whisnant, Dan Johnson, Scott Johnson, Jeff Spartz and Assistant City Administrator Miller. AGENDA D. Johnson moved, Whisnant seconded a motion to approve the agenda as presented. All members voted in favor. APPROVAL OF MINUTES Whisnant made a motion to approve the minutes of the July 8, 2014 regular meeting of the Eagan Airport Relations Departure Commission as presented, Aljets seconded the motion. All members voted in favor. There were no visitors to be heard. VISITORS TO BE HEARD OLD BUSINESS Communications Update Assistant City Administrator Miller noted that it is the practice of the Airport Relations Commission to discuss their communication initiatives each month, which include articles in the Experience Eagan Newsletter, stories aired on the City's local access cable channels as well as social media avenues. Miller noted the Town Hall meeting regarding airport noise is currently airing on E -TV and is available by webstream on the City's website. MAC Monthly Reports — Technical Advisor's Report / Eagan /Mendota Heights Corridor Analysis / Runway 17 Departure Analysis Report / Crossing -In- The - Corridor Analysis Assistant City Administrator Miller introduced the November 2014 Technical Advisory's Report, the November 2014 Eagan /Mendota Heights Corridor Analysis Report, the November 2014 Runway 17 Departure Analysis Report and the November 2014 Crossing -in- the - Corridor Analysis Report. Miller noted the December 2014 reports were also sent to Commission members. The Commission discussed the results of the November and December 2014 reports. NEW BUSINESS Feedback on Town Hall Meeting Assistant City Administrator Miller noted the Airport Relations Commission hosted a community town hall meeting on November 6, 2014 at the Eagan Community Center with the purpose of discussing airport issues. Approximately 55 -65 people were in attendance to listen and dialogue with the 4- person panel consisting of John Nelson and Dan Nelson of the MAC, Elaine Buckner of the FAA, and Jon Erickson, who is a Chief Pilot with Delta. The meeting was recorded and is available to watch via the City's website and is being aired on Eagan Television. Miller noted the Commission is encouraged to discuss the town hall meeting and provide feedback, lessons learned, takeaways to assist in planning for future public meetings related to airport issues. The Commission discussed the town hall meeting and provided the following feedback: • They liked the questions given to the panel. 0 They liked having all of the representatives present to answer the questions, giving their aspect of the question being asked and providing additional feedback. • They liked the questions that were asked afterward by residents; it promoted additional conversation. • They liked having the meeting at the Eagan Community Center. 2014 Eagan Residential Survey Results Regarding Airport Issues Assistant City Administrator Miller noted every two years the City of Eagan engages an independent research firm to conduct a residential survey. The Morris Leatherman Group was retained to conduct the 2014 residential survey, which surveyed 400 Eagan residents by phone who were randomly selected from every precinct within the City and represented ages from 18 -65 and older. The Commission discussed the survey results. STAFF / COMMISSIONER REPORT Annual MSP Aircraft Fleet Mix Assessment Assistant City Administrator Miller introduced the Annual MSP Aircraft Fleet Mix Assessment for 2014. Miller noted this report is being provided as an informative item for the Commission. The Commission discussed the assessment. March 10, 2015 ARC Meeting The Commission discussed speaker ideas for the March 10 ARC meeting, noting their desire to bring in someone to speak on aviation technology and ideally someone familiar with aviation acoustics. 2015 Noise Oversight Committee (NOC) Work Plan Assistant City Administrator Miller introduced the 2015 NOC Work Plan, which has been formally adopted by the Metropolitan Airports Commission. Miller noted this report is being provided as an informative item for the Commission. There were no roundtable items. ROUNDTABLE ADJOURNMENT Upon motion by Whisnant, seconded by Johnson, the meeting adjourned at 7:45 p.m. All members voted in favor. Date Secretary t e�C'.9ij�i y r s 2 f -yi y €� joill ,.: e9 gy ms`s s� . p t � F L y 2 , Aga e . i N e W �y 2 £ ��� 3[r wWM M-9 fivjo&M d ,a uz x s MAG -: IM IN Table of Contents for January 2015 Complaint Summary Noise Complaint Map FAA Available Time for Runway Usage MSP All Operations Runway Usage MSP Carrier Jet Operations Runway Usage MSP Carrier Jet Fleet Composition MSP All Operations Nighttime Runway Usage MSP Carrier Jet Operations Nighttime Runway Usage MSP Scheduled Nighttime Operators MSP Top 15 Nighttime Operators by Type MSP Top 15 Nighttime Operators Stage Mix Airport Noise and Operations Monitoring System Flight Tracks MSP ANOMS Remote Monitoring Tower Site Locations Map Time Above dB Threshold for Carrier Jet Arrival Related Noise Events Time Above dB Threshold for Carrier Jet Departure Related Noise Events Carrier Jet Arrival Related Noise Events Carrier Jet Departure Related Noise Events MSP Top Ten Aircraft Noise Events per RMT Analysis of Daily and Monthly Aircraft Noise Events DNL A Product of the MAC Noise Program Office 11 I 3 n 5 C 7 E 9 -11 12 13 14 -17 I: 19 20 21 22 23 -35 36 -42 MSP Complaints by City January 2015 City Arrival Departure Other Number of Complaints Number of Complainants % of Total Complaints MINNEAPOLIS 0 80 0 841 34 1475 2430 119 40.1% EAGAN 0 6 1 670 2 708 1387 24 22.9% EDINA 0 11 1 953 157 50 1172 30 19.4% RICHFIELD 19 0 28 114 106 4 271 9 4.5% INVER GROVE HEIGHTS 0 91 0 64 0 74 229 4 3.8% MENDOTA HEIGHTS 1 0 0 124 8 22 155 8 2.6% GOLDEN VALLEY 0 135 0 0 0 4 139 2 2.3% BLOOMINGTON 0 0 0 1 12 85 98 26 1.6% SAINT LOUIS PARK 0 91 0 0 1 0 92 13 1.5% APPLE VALLEY 0 20 0 2 1 4 27 8 0.4% SAINT PAUL 0 0 1 0 0 1 22 23 3 0.4% MOUNDS VIEW 0 0 0 0 0 7 7 l 0.1% DEEPHAVEN 0 0 0 0 0 4 4 1 0.1% MINNETONKA 0 0 0 0 2 2 4 3 0.1% WEST SAINT PAUL 0 0 0 3 0 0 3 1 0% BURNSVILLE 0 0 0 1 1 0 2 3 2 0% MINNEIRISTA 0 0 0 2 0 0 2 1 0% HUGO 0 1 0 0 0 0 l 1 0% ROSEMOUNT 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 0% BROOKLYN CENTER 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 ] 0% PLYMOUTH 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 0% SAINT PAUL PARK 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 0% SHAKOPEE 0 0 0 0 0 1 l 1 0% SPRING LAKE PARK 0 0 0 0 0 1 l 1 0% EDEN PRAIRIE 0 j0 0 0 0 1 l 1 0% Total 455 2805 2794 6054 263 Nature of MSP Complaints Complaint Total Early /Late 93 1425' Engine Run-up 0 801r Excessive Noise 258 5451 Frequency 220 4522 Ground Noise 2 760 Helicopter 5 9 Low Flying 49 3' 35 Structural Disturbance TS 989 Other 47 1,146 Total 18927 Note: Shaded Columns represent MSP complaints filed via the Internet. Sum of %Total of Complaints may not equal 100% due to rounding. *As of May 2005, the MSP Complaints by City report includes multiple complain descriptorsper individual complaint. Therefore, the number of complaint descriptors may be more than the number of reported complaints. Time of Day Time Total 0000 -0559 45 157 0600 -0659 46 3 :19 0700 -1159 152 1811 1200 -1559 35 752 1600 -1959 54 1283 2000 -2159 19 764 2200 - 2259 23 490 2300 -2359 3 107 Total 6054 Complaints by Airport Airport Total MSP 6054 Airlake 3 Anoka 90 Crystal 8 Flying Cloud 302 Lake Elmo 0 St. Paul 4 Misc. 0 Total 6461 Report Generated: 02/11/2015 13:20 - I _ 1 - All Operations Runway Use Report January 2015 RWY Arrival/ Departure Overflight Area Count Operations Percent Last Year Count Last Year Percent 04 Arr So. Richfield /Bloomington 1 0% 0 0 % 12L Arr So. Minneapolis /No. Richfield 2912 18.6% 1630 9.9% 12R Arr So. Minneapolis /No. Richfield 3202 20.4% 1761 10.7% 17 Arr So. Minneapolis 0 0% 0 0% 22 Arr St. Paul /Highland Park 1 0% 1 0% 30L Arr Eagan /Mendota Heights 3425 21.8% 4325 26.2% 30R Arr Eagan /Mendota Heights 3640 23.2% 5002 30.3% 35 Arr Bloomington /Eagan 2505 16% 3768 22.9% Total Arrivals 15686 16487 RWY Arrival/ Departure I Overflight Area Count Operations Percent Last Year Count Last Year Percent 04 Dep St. Paul /Highland Park 3 0% 3 0% 12L Dep Eagan /Mendota Heights 1915 12.2% 1016 6.1% 12R Dep Eagan /Mendota Heights 1038 6.6% 679 4,1% 17 Dep Bloomington /Eagan 4364 27.8% 2027 12.2% 22 Dep So. Richfield /Bloomington 4 0% 4 0% 30L Dep So. Minneapolis /No. Richfield 4873 31.1% 7590 45.8% 30R Dep So. Minneapolis /No. Richfield 3488 22.2% 5242 31.7% 35 Dep So. Minneapolis 0 1 0% 1 0 0% Total Departures 15685 16561 Total Operations 31371 33048 Sum of RUS % may not equal 100% due to rounding. -4- - _. Report Generated: 02/11/2015 13:20 -' Carrier Jet Operations Runway Use Report January 2015 RWY Arrival/ Departure Overflight Area Count Operations Percent Last Year Count Last Year Percent 04 Arr So. Richfield /Bloomington 0 0% 0 0 % 12L Arr So. Minneapolis /No, Richfield 2767 18.9% 1512 9.9% 12R Arr So. Minneapolis /No, Richfield 2895 19.8 % 1601 10.5% 17 Arr So. Minneapolis 0 0% 0 0% 22 Arr St. Paul /Highland Park 1 0% 1 30L Arr Eagan /Mendota Heights 3096 21.2% 3847 E5. % 30R Arr Eagan /Mendota Heights 3545 24.2% 4811 % 35 Arr Bloomington /Eagan 2327 15.9% 1 3436 22.6 % Total Arrivals 14631 15208 RWY Arrival/ Departure Overflight Area Count Operations Percent Last Year Count Last Year Percent 04 Dep St. Paul /Highland Park 0 D% 0 0% 12L Dep Eagan /Mendota Heights 1777 12.2% 911 6% 12R Dep Eagan /Mendota Heights 906 6.2% 635 4.2% 17 Dep Bloomington /Eagan 4116 28.2% 1 1898 12.5% 22 Dep So. Richfield /Bloomington 0 0% 2 0% 30L Dep So. Minneapolis /No. Richfield 4522 30.9% 6962 45.8% 30R Dep So, Minneapolis /No. Richfield 3296 22.5% 4806 31.6% 35 Dep So. Minneapolis 0 0% 0 0% Total Departures 14617 , 152A4. Total Operations 29248 304 ouni ui nuo io niay nui eyuai iuu7o due to rounding. Report Generated: 02/11/2015 13:20 - .5- January 2015 MSP Carrier Jet Fleet Composition Type FAR Part 36 Take - Off Noise Level' Aircraft Description Stage Count Percent DC10 0% 101.8 McDonnell Douglas DC10 3 52 0.2% B72Q 97.6 Boeing 727 Modified Stage 3 3 2 0% B777 96.2 Boeing 777 3 70 0.2% B763 95.7 Boeing 767 -300 3 248 0.8% A330 95.6 Airbus Industries A330 3 185 0.6% A310 92.9 Airbus Industries A310 3 2 0% MD11 92.8 McDonnell Douglas MD11 3 179 0.6% 8762 92.1 Boeing 767 -200 3 42 0.1% A300 91.5 Airbus Industries A300 3 16 0.1% MD80 91.5 McDonnell Douglas MD80 3 980 3.4% 8757 91.4 Boeing 757 -200 3 1842 6.3% B764 91.2 Boeing 767 -400 3 60 0.2% DC9Q 91 McDonnell Douglas DC9 Modified Stage 3 3 2 0% A321 89.8 Airbus Industries A321 3 278 1 % B734 88.9 Boeing 737 -400 3 16 0.1% B738 88.6 Boeing 737 -800 3 2148 7.3% B739 88.4 Boeing 737 -900 3 321 1.1% A320 87.8 Airbus Industries A320 3 2191 7.5% 8733 87.5 Boeing 737 -300 3 178 0.6% A319 87.4 Airbus Industries A319 3 2373 8.1% E190 86.9 Embraer 190 3 104 0.4% 87377 85.9 Boeing 737 -700 3 1495 5.1% CRJ9 84.6 Canadair Regional Jet CRJ -900 3 4242 14.5% E170 84.6 Embraer 170 3 2080 7.1% MD90 84.2 McDonnell Douglas MD90 3 2183 7.5% B717 84.1 Boeing 717 3 214 0.7% E145 83.7 Embraer 145 3 511 1.7% CRJ7 812 Canadair Regional Jet CRJ -700 3 1749 6% CRJ 79.8 Canadair Regional Jet CRJ 3 1 0% CRJ1 79.8 Canadair Regional Jet CRJ -100 3 2 0% CRJ2 78.7 Canadair Regional Jet CRJ -200 3 5468 18.7% E135 77.9 Embraer 135 3 2 0% J328 76.5 Fairchild Dornier 328 3 12 0% Totals 29248 Sum of fleet mix % may not equal 100% due to rounding. NOTE 1: Stage 3 represent aircraft modified to meet all Stage 3 criteria as outlined in Federal Aviation Regulation (FAR) Part 36. This includes hushkit engines, engine retrofits or aircraft operational flight configurations. -The Provided Noise levels from FAR Part 36 are the loudest levels documented for the representative aircraft type during take -off measured in EPNL dBA (Effective Perceived Noise Level). -EPNL is the level of the time integral of the antilogarithm of one -tenth of tone - corrected perceived noise level of an aircraft flyover measured in A- weighted decibels. NOTE 2: Due to flight tracking data enhancements, the air carrier operations counts for Last Year included in this report have been updated to reflect revised aircraft type counts. Please refer to the interactive reports at www.macnoise.com for detailed information regarding aircraft types. -6- - Report Generated: 02/11/2015 13:20 - Count Current Percent Last Year Percent2 Stage 2 0 0% 0% Stage 3 4 0% 0% Stage 3 Manufactured 29244 100% 100% Total Stage 3 29248 NOTE 1: Stage 3 represent aircraft modified to meet all Stage 3 criteria as outlined in Federal Aviation Regulation (FAR) Part 36. This includes hushkit engines, engine retrofits or aircraft operational flight configurations. -The Provided Noise levels from FAR Part 36 are the loudest levels documented for the representative aircraft type during take -off measured in EPNL dBA (Effective Perceived Noise Level). -EPNL is the level of the time integral of the antilogarithm of one -tenth of tone - corrected perceived noise level of an aircraft flyover measured in A- weighted decibels. NOTE 2: Due to flight tracking data enhancements, the air carrier operations counts for Last Year included in this report have been updated to reflect revised aircraft type counts. Please refer to the interactive reports at www.macnoise.com for detailed information regarding aircraft types. -6- - Report Generated: 02/11/2015 13:20 - Nighttime All Operations 10 :30 p.m. to 6:00 a.m. Runway Use Report January 2015 °RWY Arrival/ Departure Overflight Area Count Operations. Percent Last Year Count Last Year, Percent 04 Arr So. Richfield /Bloomington 0 0% 0 0 % 12L Arr So. Minneapolis /No. Richfield 119 10.3% 100 9.9% 12R Arr So. Minneapolis /No. Richfield 266 23.1% 202 20% 17 Arr So. Minneapolis 0 0% 0 0% 22 Arr St. Paul /Highland Park 0 0% 1 0.1 30L Arr Eagan /Mendota Heights 537 46.7% 464 46% 30R Arr Eagan /Mendota Heights 203 17.6% 1 241 23.9% 35 Arr Bloomington /Eagan 26 2.3% 1 0.1% Total Arrivals 1151 1009 RWY Arrival/ Departure Overflight Area Count Operations Percent Last Year Count Last Year Percent 04 Dep St. Paul /Highland Park 0 0% 0 0% 12L Dep Eagan /Mendota Heights 45 12.5% 45 11.4 %e 12R Dep Eagan /Mendota Heights 105 29.2% 100 25.3% 17 Dep Bloomington /Eagan 50 13.9% 28 7.1% 22 Dep So. Richfield /Bloomington 1 0.3% 0 0% 30L Dep So. Minneapolis /No. Richfield 119 33.1% 151 38.2% 30R Dep So. Minneapolis /No. Richfield 40 11.1% 71 18% 35 Dep So. Minneapolis 0 0% 0 0% Total Departures 360 395 Total Operations- 1511 1404 Sum of RUS % may not equal 100% due to rounding. Report Generated: 02/11/2015 13:20 7- Nighttime Carrier Jet Operations 10:30 p.m. to 6:00 a.m. Runway Use Report January 2015 RWY Arrival/ Departure Overflight Area Count Operations Percent Last Year Count Last Year Percent 04 Arr So. Richfield /Bloomington 0 0 %0 0 0% 12L Arr So. Minneapolis /No. Richfield 116 10.6% 95 10.2% 12R Arr So. Minneapolis /No. Richfield 254 23.1% 189 20.2 % 17 Arr So. Minneapolis 0 0% 0 0% 22 Arr St. Paul /Highland Park 0 0% 1 0.1% 30L Arr Eagan /Mendota Heights 509 46.3% 423 45.3% 30R Arr Eagan /Mendota Heights 194 17.7% 226 24.2 %0 35 Arr Bloomington /Eagan 26 2.4% 0 0% Total Arrivals 1099 934 RWY Arrival/ Departure Overflight Area Count Operations Percent Last Year Count Last Year Percent 04 Dep St. Paul /Highland Park 0 0% 0 0% 12L Dep Eagan /Mendota Heights 43 12.6% 44 12.4% 12R Dep Eagan /Mendota Heights 99 29% 88 24.7% 17 Dep Bloomington /Eagan 46 13.5% 23 6.5% 22 Dep So. Richfield /Bloomington 0 0% 0 0% 30L Dep. So. Minneapolis /No. Richfield 114 33.4% 132 37,1% 30R Dep So. Minneapolis /No. Richfield 39 11.4% 69 19.4% 35 Dep So. Minneapolis 0 0% 0 0% Total Departures 341 356 Total Operations 1440 1290 Sum of RUS % may not equal 100% due to rounding. -8- - - Report Generated: 02/11/2015 13:20 k k Im a go a � �� �. a � � I I l l € �'�.€ � -o y fd I n r d d lift, t � 3 i' 8. Sig IN February 2015 Nighttime Scheduled Carrier Jet Operations Time A/D Carrier Flight Number Equipment Stage 3 Days of Operation Routing 22:30 A Southwest 3634 B737 M S PBI ATL MSP 22:30 A Southwest 4127 B737 M MTWThFSu ATL MSP 22:38 A United 669 A320 M MTWThFSu DEN MSP 22:39 A Sun Country 346 B738 M Th MCO MSP 22:45 A Southwest 3122 738 M MTWThFSu MDW MSP 22:45 A Sun Country 404 8737 M MF SAN MSP 22:51 A United 3748 E175 M S DFW IAH MSP 22:56 A Sun Country 426 8737 M MWF LAX MSP 22:58 A American 227 MD80 M MTWThFSSu DFW MSP 23:00 A Spirit 428 A320 M MTWThFSSu TPA MSP 23:01 A United 5593 CRJ M MTWTh LAX MSP 23:05 A Sun Country 610 B738 M MWThFSSu PHX MSP 23:05 A Sun Country 610 B737 M T PHX MSP 23:05 A Sun Country 396 B737 M WF SFO MSP 23:05 A Sun Country 254 B737 M ThSu BOS MSP 23:09 A Sun Country 248 B737 M TThSu JFK MSP 23:09 A Sun Country 346 B738 M MTWFSu MCO MSP 23:14 A United 5593 CRJ M Su LAX MSP 23:15 A American 1689 8738 M MTWFSSu MIA MSP 23:19 A Delta 300 8739 M S ATL MSP 23:19 A United 3501 E170 M Su DFW EWR MSP 23:20 A Delta 300 MD90 M MTThFSu ATL MSP 23:20 A Delta 300 B739 M W ATL MSP 23:24 A Sun Country 348 B737 M S MCO MSP 23:26 A Delta 1660 A319 M MWThFSu SLC MSP 23:27 A Delta 1660 738 M T SLC MSP 23:30 A Sun Country 370 B737 M Th TPA MSP 23:30 A Sun Country 596 B737 M T MZT MSP 23:35 A Sun Country 582 B738 M S CUN MSP 23:39 A Frontier Airlines 116 A319 M MTWThFSSu DEN MSP 23:45 A Sun Country 236 B737 M TWFSu DCA MSP 23:49 A United 5593 CRJ M F LAX MSP 23:50 A Sun Country 386 8738 M TWThFS RSW MSP 23:53 A Sun Country 622 B737 M S PSP MSP 23:55 A US Airways 2039 A321 M WThF RSW CLT MSP 23:55 A Sun Country 596 B738 M S MZT MSP 23:55 A Sun Country 550 B738 M S SJD MSP 23:55 A US Airways 2039 A319 M S RSW CLT MSP 23:55 A Sun Country 550 B737 M ThSu SJD MSP 23:55 A US Airways 2039 A321 M Su CLT MSP 23:56 A US Airways 2027 A321 M MWThFSSu LAS PHX MSP 00:05 A Sun Country 544 8738 M M CUN MSP 00:07 A American 3108 CRJ M MTWThFSSu ORD MSP 00:17 A Sun Country 108 8738 M MWThFS LAS MSP 00:17 A Sun Country 108 8737 M TSu LAS MSP 00:23 A Spirit 596 A319 M MTWThFSSu FLL MSP 00:23 A Spirit 596 A319 M Su FLL MSP 00:40 A Sun Country 544 B738 M SSu CUN MSP 00:58 A US Airways 442 A321 M M PHX MSP 01:15 D Spirit 597 A319 M MTWThFSSu MSP FLL -10- , Report Generated: 02/11/2015 13:20- 7 - February 2015 Nighttime Scheduled Carrier Jet Operations Time A/D Carrier Flight Number Equipment Stage 3- Days of Operation Routing 03:35 A UPS 0554 B757 M F 03:35 A UPS 1460 8757 M S 03:47 A UPS 0556 B757 M T 03:59 A US Airways 889 A320 M Su PHX MSP 03:59 A US Airways 889 A320 M MFSSu PHX MSP 04:19 A UPS 0556 8757 M TWThF 04:25 A Fedex 8364 FA20 MTWTh 04:30 A UPS 0558 B757 M TWThF 05:00 D United 5101 E175 M S MSP IAH DTW 05:00 D United 3739 E175 M MThF MSP IAH MCI 05:09 A UPS 0560 MD11 M TWThF 05:10 D US Airways 1709 A321 M MTWThFS MSP CLT FLL 05:10 A Fedex 1718 MD11 M MTWTh 05:11 A Sun Country 430 B737 M MF LAX MSP 05:18 A UPS 0554 8757 M F 05:20 D US Airways 560 A320 M MFSSu MSP PHX SEA 05:21 A Spirit 612 A320 M MTWThFSSu LAS MSP ORD 05:30 A Sun Country 398 B738 M F SFO MSP 05:30 D American 1287 B738 M MTWThFSSu MSP MIA 05:30 D Delta 1991 B738 M S MSP ATL 05:30 D Sun Country 563 B738 M SSu MSP CUN 05:30 D Delta 1991 B739 M T MSP ATL 05:30 D Delta 1991 MD90 M MWThF MSP ATL 05:30 D Delta 1991 B757 M Su MSP ATL 05:34 A Fedex 1190 B757 M MTWTh 05:36 A Fedex 1407 MD11 M MTWThF 05:43 D American 1249 MD80 M MTWThFSSu MSP ORD 05:45 D Frontier Airlines 117 A319 M MTWThFSSu MSP DEN 05:45 A Delta 1450 B757 M S LAS MSP 05:47 A Delta 1450 B753 M MTThFSu LAS MSP 05:50 A Delta 1450 B739 M W LAS MSP 05:51 A UPS 0496 B757 M S 05:58 A Delta 806 MD90 M S SFO MSP Report Generated: 02/11/2015 13:20 - 11 - — January 2015 Top 15 Actual Nighttime Jet Operators by Type 10:30 p.m. to 6:00 a.m. Total Nighttime Jet Operations by Hour Hour Count 2230 320 2300 399 2400 156 100 65 200 29 300 31 400 47 500 393 TOTAL 1440 Note:. The top 15 nighttime operators represent 96.3% of the total nighttime carrier jet operations. Airline ID Stage Type Count American AAL 3 8738 45 American AAL 3 MD80 48 Atlantic Southeast ASQ 3 CRJ9 2 Atlantic Southeast ASQ 3 E145 6 Atlantic Southeast ASQ 3 CRJ7 16 Delta DAL 3 A330 1 Delta DAL 3 MD80 3 Delta DAL 3 8717 4 Delta DAL 3 B739 7 Delta DAL 3 A320 13 Delta DAL 3 6738 19 Delta DAL 3 B763 20 Delta DAL 3 MD90 58 Delta DAL 3 A319 75 Delta DAL 3 B757 96 Endeavor Air FLG 3 CRJ2 17 Endeavor Air FLG 3 CRJ9 45 Envoy Air ENY 3 CRJ7 21 FedEx FDX 3 A300 2 FedEx FDX 3 DC10 3 FedEx FDX 3 MD11 25 Frontier Airlines FFT 3 A320 6 Frontier Airlines FFT 3 A319 42 Mesa Airlines ASH 3 E170 21 Skywest Airlines SKW 3 CRJ9 2 Skywest Airlines SKW 3 E170 6 Skywest Airlines SKW 3 CRJ7 32 Skywest Airlines SKW 3 CRJ2 45 Southwest SWA 3 B733 5 Southwest SWA 3 8738 27 Southwest SWA 3 B7377 35 Spirit NKS 3 A319 61 Spirit NKS 3 A320 79 Sun Country SCX 3 B7377 107 Sun Country SCX 3 B738 187 United UAL 3 B7377 1 United UAL 3 B739 2 United UAL 3 B738 4 United UAL 3 A319 8 United UAL 3 A320 13 UPS UPS 3 MD11 18 UPS UPS 3 B757 46 US Airways AWE 3 E190 2 US Airways AWE 3 A319 4 US Airways AWE 3 A320 37 US Airways AWE 3 A321 70 TOTAL 1386 12 - Report Generated: 02/11 /201513:20 ym a . w2 ƒ£/ + M, \\ /\ Iof - /J N: §�$(\ C < �#.2 :�( :�,4J � \(�. �{ 2 m)mm » �E� � - /� Ell M1 I l. »( /\ \(� \. \a \��\ bl \ \ \ \( r s 1 14Y `ill TW r. ! \I .4 5 O ON Ii 's'A&j go Rv p � � i }}} wr a ggo T \ €Q Pip €� OIL 8 I � .� ..._..sec .sa..i €..L�n ¥.€6��.. c�i , 4 Time Above dB Threshold for Arrival Related Noise Events January 2015 RMT ID City Address Time >= 65dB Time >= 80dB Time' > = 90dB Time >= 100dB 1 Minneapolis Xerxes Ave. & 41st St. 08:25:21 00:00:08 00:00:00 00:00:00 2 Minneapolis Fremont Ave. & 43rd St. 10:55:04 00:01:47 00:00:02 00:00:00 3 Minneapolis West Elmwood St. & Belmont Ave. 14:39:34 00:15:59 00:00:18 00:00:00 4 Minneapolis Park Ave. & 48th St, 11:19:30 00:02:39 00:00:06 00:00:00 5 Minneapolis 12th Ave. & 58th St. 15:01:19 02:37:43 00:00:37 00:00:00 6 Minneapolis 25th Ave. & 57th St. 12:46:26 01:39:56 00:00:24 00:00:02 7 Richfield Wentworth Ave. & 64th St. 00:09:35 00:00:11 00:00:00 00:00:00 8 Minneapolis Longfellow Ave. & 43rd St. 00:01:58 00:00:00 00:00:00 00:00:00 9 St. Paul Saratoga St. & Hartford Ave. 00:00:15 00:00 :00 00:00:00 00:00:00 10 St. Paul Itasca Ave. & Bowdoin St, 00:00:24 00:00:02 00:00:00 00:00:00 11 St. Paul Finn St. & Scheffer Ave. 00:00:00 00:00:00 00:00:00 00:00:00 12 St. Paul Alton St. & Rockwood Ave. 00:00:32 00:00:00 00:00:00 00:00:00 13 Mendota Heights Southeast end of Mohican Court 00:02:01 00:00:00 00:00:00 00 :00:00 14 Eagan 1st St. & McKee St. 11:45 :29 00:00:23 00:00:00 00:00:00 15 Mendota Heights Cullon St. & Lexington Ave. 00:08:22 00:00 :05 00:00:00 00:00:00 16 Eagan Avalon Ave. & Vilas Ln. 15:33:05 00:22:27 00:00:26 00:00:00 17 Bloomington 84th St. & 4th Ave. 00:00:16 00:00:00 00:00:00 00:00:00 18 Richfield 75th St. & 17th Ave. 00:28:59 00:00:08 00:00:00 00:00:00 19 Bloomington 16th Ave. & 84th St. 00:09:37 00:00:00 00:00:00 00:00:00 20 Richfield 75th St. & 3rd Ave. 00:00:39 00:00:00 00:00:00 00:00:00 21 Inver Grove Heights Barbara Ave. & 67th St. 00:00:53 00:00:00 00:00:00 00:00:00 22 Inver Grove Heights Anne Marie Trail 05:09:16 00:00:02 00:00:00 00:00:00 23 Mendota Heights End of Kenndon Ave. 00:23:20 00:00:07 00:00:00 00:00:00 24 Eagan Chapel Ln. & Wren Ln. 12:30:35 00:00:06 00:00:00 00:00:00 25 Eagan Moonshine Park 1321 Jurdy Rd. 00:26:01 00:00:00 00:00:00 00:00:00 26 Inver Grove Heights 6796 Arkansas Ave. W. 00:12:10 00:00:00 00:00:00 00:00:00 27 Minneapolis Anthony School 5757 Irving Ave. S. 00:02:22 1 00:00:13 00:00:00 00:00:00 28 Richfield 6645 16th Ave. S. 01:00:47 00:00:19 00:00:00 00:00:00 29 Minneapolis Ericsson Elem. School 4315 31st Ave. S. 00:00:14 00:00:00 00:00:00 00:00:00 30 Bloomington 8715 River Ridge Rd. 01:43:27 00:00:12 00:00:00 00:00:00 31 Bloomington 9501 12th Ave. S. 00:00:40 00:00:00 00:00:00 00:00:00 32 Bloomington 10325 Pleasant Ave. S. 00:00 :00 00 :00:00 00:00:00 00:00:00 33 Burnsville North River Hills Park 00:00:43 00:00:00 00:00:00 00:00:00 34 Burnsville Red Oak Park 00:00:54 00:00:00 00:00:00 00:00:00 35 Eagan 2100 Garnet Ln. 03:26:11 00:00:03 00:00:00 00:00:00 36 Apple Valley Briar Oaks & Scout Pond 07:51:48 00 :00:07 00:00:00 00:00:00 37 Eagan 4399 Woodgate Ln. N. 00:00:23 00:00:00 00:00:00 00:00:00 38 Eagan 3957 Turquoise Cir. 00:00:10 00:00:00 00:00:00 00:00:00 39 Eagan 3477 St. Charles PI, 00:00:00 00:00:00 00:00:00 00:00:00 Total Time for Arrival Noise Events 134:18:20 05;02:37 00:01:53 00 :00:02 "Note: These time values and levels are based upon 1- second leq levels. Report Generated: 02/11/2015 13:20 _19- Time Above Threshold dB for Departure Related Noise Events January 2015 RMT ID City Address Time >= 65dB Time >= 80dB Time >= 90dB Time >= 100dB 1 Minneapolis Xerxes Ave. & 41st St. 01:24:26 00:00:00 00 :00:00 00:00:00 2 Minneapolis Fremont Ave. & 43rd St. 01:58:00 00:00:08 00:00:00 00:00:00 3 Minneapolis West Elmwood St. & Belmont Ave. 04:26:53 00 :02:29 00 :00:00 00:00:00 4 Minneapolis Park Ave. & 48th St. 05:19:38 00:01:55 00:00:00 00:00:00 5 Minneapolis 12th Ave. & 58th St. 27:18:33 01:23:47 00:01:38 00:00:00 6 Minneapolis 25th Ave. & 57th St. 27:49:05 01:48:05 00:03:40 00:00:00 7 Richfield Wentworth Ave. & 64th St. 19:24:57 00:31:17 00:00:01 00:00:00 8 Minneapolis Longfellow Ave. & 43rd St. 05:31:28 00:09:30 00:00:05 00:00:00 9 St. Paul Saratoga St. & Hartford Ave. 00:04:16 00:00:00 00:00:00 00:00:00 10 St, Paul Itasca Ave. & Bowdoin St. 00:01:32 00:00:10 00:00:00 00:00:00 11 St, Paul Finn St. & Scheffer Ave. 00:02:28 00:00:00 00:00:00 00:00:00 12 St. Paul Alton St. & Rockwood Ave. 00:04:19 00:00:04 00:00:00 00:00:00 13 Mendota Heights Southeast end of Mohican Court 03:35:02 00:00:35 00 :00:00 00:00:00 14 Eagan 1st St. & McKee St. 05:18:19 00:06:10 00:00:00 00:00:00 15 Mendota Heights Cullon St. & Lexington Ave. 05:01:13 00:02:15 00:00:00 00:00:00 16 Eagan Avalon Ave. & Vilas Ln. 05:06:47 00:12:59 00 :00:03 00:00:00 17 Bloomington 84th St. & 4th Ave. 00:14:01 00:00:06 00:00:00 00:00:00 18 Richfield 75th St. & 17th Ave. 07:56:57 00:01:55 00 :00:00 00:00:00 19 Bloomington 16th Ave. & 84th St. 03:42:13 00:00:11 00:00:00 00:00:00 20 Richfield 75th St. & 3rd Ave. 00:39:51 00:00:17 00:00:00 00:00:00 21 Inver Grove Heights Barbara Ave. & 67th St. 00:30:38 00:00:02 00:00:00 00:00:00 22 Inver Grove Heights Anne Marie Trail 00:41:12 00:00:03 00:00:00 00:00:00 23 Mendota Heights End of Kenndon Ave. 10:36:22 00:13:16 00:00:23 00:00:00 24 Eagan Chapel Ln. & Wren Ln. 03:10:31 00:01:20 00:00:00 00:00 :00 25 Eagan Moonshine Park 1321 Jurdy Rd. 04:21 :38 00:00:04 00:00:00 00:00:00 26 Inver Grove Heights 6796 Arkansas Ave. W. 01:47:34 00:00:28 00:00:00 00:00:00 27 Minneapolis Anthony School 5757 Irving Ave. S. 06:53:05 00:04:45 00:00:00 00:00:00 28 Richfield 6645 16th Ave. S. 11:46:48 00:06 :53 00:00:01 00:00 :00 29 Minneapolis Ericsson Elem. School 4315 31stAve. S. 04:21:37 00:01:57 00:00:00 00:00:00 30 Bloomington 8715 River Ridge Rd. 18:46 :26 00:34:29 00:00:08 00:00:00 31 Bloomington 9501 12th Ave. S. 01:51:09 00:00:28 00:00:00 00:00:00 32 Bloomington 10325 Pleasant Ave. S. 00:30:59 00:00:05 00:00 :00 00:00:00 33 Burnsville North River Hills Park 01:48:57 00:00:36 00:00:00 00:00:00 34 Burnsville Red Oak Park 00:43:53 00:00:02 00:00:00 00:00:00 35 Eagan 2100 Garnet Ln. 02:45:09 00:01:46 00:00:00 00:00:00 36 Apple Valley Briar Oaks & Scout Pond 00:56:08 00:00:14 00:00:00 00 :00:00 37 Eagan 4399 Woodgate Ln. N. 01:37:03 00:00:17 00:00:00 00:00:00 38 Eagan 3957 Turquoise Cir. 02:58:00 00:01:42 00:00:00 00:00:00 39 Eagan 3477 St. Charles PI. 02:33:32 00:01:45 00:00:00 00:00:00 Total Time for Departure Noise Events 203 :40:39 05 :32:05 1 00:05:59 00:00 :00 *Note: These time values and levels are based upon 1- second leq levels. -20- Report Generated: 02/11/2015 13:20 Arrival Related Noise Events January 2015 RMT ID City Address Arrival Events >= 65dB Arrival Events >= 80dB Arrival Events > = 90d13 Arrival Events >_ 100dB 1 Minneapolis Xerxes Ave. & 41st St. 2071 5 0 0 2 Minneapolis Fremont Ave. & 43rd St. 2710 30 1 0 3 Minneapolis West Elmwood St. &'Belmont Ave. 3148 247 5 0 4 Minneapolis Park Ave, & 48th St, 2821 38 2 0 5 Minneapolis 12th Ave. & 58th St. 3284 2329 11 0 6 Minneapolis 25th Ave. & 57th St, 3007 1996 7 2 7 Richfield Wentworth Ave, & 64th St. 41 5 0 0 8 Minneapolis Longfellow Ave. & 43rd St. 9 0 0 0 9 St. Paul Saratoga St. & Hartford Ave. 1 0 0 0 10 St. Paul Itasca Ave. & Bowdoin St. 2 1 0 0 11 St. Paul Finn St. & Scheffer Ave. 0 0 0 0 12 St. Paul Alton St. & Rockwood Ave, 3 0 0 0 13 Mendota Heights Southeast end of Mohican Court 8 0 0 0 14 Eagan 1st St. & McKee St. 2622 10 0 0 15 Mendota Heights Cullon St. & Lexington Ave. 39 2 0 0 16 Eagan Avalon Ave. & Vilas Ln. 3424 361 6 0 17 Bloomington 84th St. & 4th Ave. 1 0 0 0 18 Richfield 75th St. & 17th Ave, 114 3 0 0 19 Bloomington 16th Ave. & 84th St, 24 0 0 0 20 Richfield 75th St. & 3rd Ave. 2 0 0 0 21 Inver Grove Heights Barbara Ave. & 87th St. 4 0 0 0 22 Inver Grove Heights Anne Marie Trail 1282 1 0 0 23 Mendota Heights End of Kenndon Ave. 87 4 0 0 24 Eagan Chapel Ln. & Wren Ln. 2870 4 0 0 25 Eagan Moonshine Park 1321 Jurdy Rd. 89 0 0 0 26 Inver Grove Heights 6796 Arkansas Ave. W. 53 0 0 0 27 Minneapolis Anthony School 5757 Irving Ave. S. 11 1 0 0 28 Richfield 6645 16th Ave. S. 207 11 0 0 29 Minneapolis Ericsson Elem. School 4315 31st Ave. S. 1 0 0 0 30 Bloomington 8715 River Ridge Rd. 453 4 0 D 31 Bloomington 9501 12th Ave. S. 3 0 0 0 32 Bloomington 10325 Pleasant Ave, S. 0 0 0 0 33 Burnsville North River Hills Park 3 0 0 0 34 Burnsville Red Oak Park 4 0 0 0 35 Eagan 2100 Garnet Ln. 857 1 0 0 36 Apple Valley Briar Oaks & Scout Pond 1721 3 0 0 37 Eagan 4399 Woodgate Ln. N. 2 0 0 0 38 Eagan 3957 Turquoise Cir. 1 0 0 0 39 Eagan 3477 St. Charles Pl. 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 Total Arrival Noise Events 30979 1 5056 1 32 1 2 *Note: These counts are based upon Lmax. Report Generated: 02/11/2015 13:20 .21 - - Departure Related Noise Events January 2015 RMT ID City Address Departure Events >= 65dB Departure Events >= 80dB Departure Events >= 90dB Departure Events >= 100dB 1 Minneapolis Xerxes Ave. & 41st St. 314 0 0 0 2 Minneapolis Fremont Ave. & 43rd St. 432 2 0 0 3 Minneapolis West Elmwood St. & Belmont Ave. 867 31 0 0 4 Minneapolis Park Ave. & 48th St. 990 38 0 0 5 Minneapolis 12th Ave. & 58th St. 4444 806 37 0 6 Minneapolis 25th Ave. & 57th St, 4853 1111 57 0 7 Richfield Wentworth Ave. & 64th St. 3367 263 1 0 8 Minneapolis Longfellow Ave. & 43rd St, 1034 64 2 0 9 St. Paul Saratoga St. & Hartford Ave. 15 0 0 0 10 1 St. Paul Itasca Ave. & Bowdoin St. 4 1 0 0 11 St. Paul Finn St. & Scheffer Ave. 8 0 0 0 12 St. Paul Alton St. & Rockwood Ave. 12 1 0 0 13 Mendota Heights Southeast end of Mohican Court 770 9 0 0 14 Eagan 1 st St. & McKee St. 1001 69 0 0 15 Mendota Heights Cullon St. & Lexington Ave. 996 37 0 0 16 Eagan Avalon Ave. & Vilas Ln. 879 129 2 0 17 Bloomington 84th St. & 4th Ave. 52 1 0 0 18 Richfield 75th St. & 17th Ave. 1755 33 0 0 19 Bloomington 16th Ave. & 84th St. 718 7 0 0 20 Richfield 75th St. & 3rd Ave. 126 4 0 0 21 Inver Grove Heights Barbara Ave. & 67th St. 124 1 0 0 22 Inver Grove Heights Anne Marie Trail 163 1 0 0 23 Mendota Heights End of Kenndon Ave. 1912 159 6 0 24 Eagan Chapel Ln. & Wren Ln. 638 16 0 0 25 Eagan Moonshine Park 1321 Jurdy Rd. 572 2 0 0 26 Inver Grove Heights 6796 Arkansas Ave. W. 404 9 0 0 27 Minneapolis Anthony School 5757 Irving Ave. S. 1330 57 0 0 28 Richfield 6645 16th Ave. S. 2218 103 1 0 29 Minneapolis Ericsson Elem, School 4315 31st Ave. S. 836 18 0 0 30 Bloomington 8715 River Ridge Rd. 3023 275 4 0 31 Bloomington 9501 12th Ave. S. 359 7 0 0 32 Bloomington 10325 Pleasant Ave. S. 114 1 0 0 33 Burnsville North River Hills Park 369 7 0 0 34 Burnsville Red Oak Park 158 2 0 0 35 Eagan 2100 Garnet Ln. 575 21 0 0 36 Apple Valley Briar Oaks & Scout Pond 207 3 0 0 37 Eagan 4399 Woodgate Ln. N. 344 6 0 0 38 Eagan 3957 Turquoise Cir. 626 20 0 0 39 Eagan 3477 St. Charles PI. 581 19 0 0 Total Departure Noise Events 37190 3333 110 0 *Note: These counts are based upon Lmax. 22 - Report Generated: 02/11/2015 13:20 Top Ten Loudest Aircraft Noise Events for MSP January 2015 (RMT Site #1) Xerxes Ave. & 41st St., Minneapolis Date /Time Flight Number Aircraft Type Arrival/ Departure Runway Lmax(dB) 01/28/201519:59 BMJ47 BE65 A 12L 81.5 01/28/201515:12 AAL2230 MD80 A 12R 80.8 01/13/201510:05 ASQ5550 CRJ7 A 12L 80.4 01/22/201517:43 FDX715 MD11 A 12R 80.4 01/14/201517:54 FDX715 MD11 A 12R 80.1 01/16/201512:05 DAL1453 B738 A 12R 79.7 01/23/201511:35 DAL584 B777 D 30L 79.3 01/02/201517:41 DAL1381 8757 A 12R 79.2 01/08/2015 9:00 DAL2544 MD80 A 12R 78.9 01/29/2015 7:25 BMJ62 BE65 D 30R 78.7 (RMT Site #2) Fremont Ave. & 43rd St., Minneapolis Date/Time Flight Number Aircraft Type Arrival/ Departure - Runway Lmax(dB) 01/27/201516:34 DAL2586 8757 A 12L 912 01/16/201511:04 AAL1218 MD80 A 12L 87.7 01/28/201519:59 BMJ47 BE65 A 12L 86 01/19/2015 8:52 DAL2544 MD80 A 12L 852 01/16/201517:33 DAL1819 MD80 A 12L 85 01/19/201512:10 DAL2319 MD80 A 12L 85 01/16/2015 17:15 AAL1430 MD80 A 12L 84.6 01/16/201512:35 DAL2319 MD80 A 12L 84.3 01/16/2015 20:27 DAL1663 MD80 A 12L 83.9 01/30/2015 9:26 GLA997 B190 A 12L 83.1 (RMT Site #3) West Elmwood St. & Belmont Ave., Minneapolis Date/Time Flight Number Aircraft Type Arrival/ Departure Runway Lmax(dB) 01/22/2015 21:03 DAL888 B757 A 12R 99.1 01/05/201517:34 DAL756 B757 A 12R 94.2 01/02/201517:42 DAL1381 B757 A 12R 92.7 01/05/2015 20:13 BMJ47 BE65 A 12R 90.3 01/02/201518:30 DAL1528 8757 A 12R 90 01/22/201517:06 DAL2540 B757 A 12R 89 01/13/201519:21 NOAA46 DHC6 A 12R 87.9 01/28/2015 5:21 FDX1407 MD11 A 12R 87.7 01/28/201510:58 AAL1218 MD80 A 12R 86.7 01/27/2015 20:58 AAL1154 MD80 A 12R 86.5 Report Generated: 02/11/2015 13:20 - -- . -- . ' - -- - - .23- Top Ten Loudest Aircraft Noise Events for MSP January 2015 (RMT Site #4) Park Ave. & 48th St., Minneapolis Date /Time Flight Number Aircraft Type Arrival/ Departure Runway Lmax(dB) 01/27/201516:35 DAL2586 B757 A 12L 91.7 01/03/2015 9 :54 DAL 1574 B757 A 12L 91.3 01/19/201512:10 DAL2319 MD80 A 12L 86.8 01/03/201518:39 DAL2296 MD80 D 30L 86 01/28/2015 20:00 BMJ47 BE65 A 12L 85.5 01/04/2015 6:55 DAL2409 MD80 D 30L 85 01/16/201517:59 AAL1116 MD80 A 12L 85 01/31/201511:47 DAL1664 MD80 D 30R 84.9 01/15/201510:19 DAL1496 MD80 D 30R 84.4 01/30/2015 20:15 DAL2105 MD90 A 12R 84 (RMT Site #5) 12th Ave. & 58th St., Minneapolis Date /Time Flight Number Aircraft Type Arrival/ Departure Runway Lmax(dB) 01/28/2015 5:26 FDX1718 MD11 A 12R 95 01/02/201518:30 DAL1528 B757 A 12R 94.3 01/05/201517:35 DAL756 B757 A 12R 94 01/31/201512:28 AAL1218 MD80 D 30L 93.6 01/22/2015 21:04 DAL888 B757 A 12R 93.5 01/02/201517:43 DAL1381 B757 A 12R 93.3 01/05/201519:58 BMJ38 BE80 A 12R 92,7 01/26/201512:10 AAL1218 MD80 D 30L 92.7 01/25/2015 7:45 DAL2587 MD80 D 30L 92.7 01/31/2015 7:27 DAL2587 MD80 D 30L 92.4 (RMT Site #6) 25th Ave. & 57th St., Minneapolis Date /Time Flight Number Aircraft Type Arrival/ Departure Runway Lmax(dB) 01/27/201516:35 DAL2586 B757 A 12L 101.6 01/03/2015 9:54 DAL 1574 B757 A 12L 100.8 01/18/201515:36 DAL1664 MD80 D 30R 98.3 01/18/201511:26 DAL1734 MD80 D 30R 95.8 01/04/201514:17 DAL2096 MD80 D 30R 957 01/26/201515:08 DAL1664 MD80 D 30R 95.5 01/03/201519:59 DAL1274 MD80 D 30R 95.3 01/03/201514:00 DAL2096 MD80 D 30R 95.3 01/06/2015 15:35 DAL848 MD80 D 30R 95 01/01/201515:55 DAL2196 MD80 D 30R 94.8 -24- Report Generated: 02/11/2015 13 :20 Top Ten Loudest Aircraft Noise Events for MSP January 2015 (RMT Site #7) Wentworth Ave. & 64th St., Richfield Date /Time Flight Number Aircraft Type Arrival/ Departure Runway Lmax(dB) 01/03/201515:53 AAL2431 MD80 D 30L 90.1 01/11/201517:57 DAL2551 MD80 D 30L 89.8 01/12/2015 8:43 AAL1301 MD80 D 30L 89,3 01/29/201517:59 AAL2302 MD80 D 30L 88.9 01/31/2015 7:22 AAL2253 MD80 D 30L 88.9 01/04/201514:27 AAL1633 MD80 D 30L 88.8 01/01/201515:36 DAL2462 MD80 D 30L 88.8 01/18/201511:22 DAL1691 MD80 D 30L 88.7 01/29/201512:01 AAL1218 MD80 D 30L 88.6 01/29/2015 7:04 AAL2253 MD80 D 30L 88.5 (RMT Site #8) Longfellow Ave. & 43rd St., Minneapolis Date/Time Flight Number Aircraft Type Arrival/ Departure Runway Lmax(dB) 01/03/201514:01 DAL2096 MD80 D 30R 91.5 01/23/201513:33 DAL848 MD80 D 30R 90.8 01/26/201515:09 DAL1664 MD80 D 30R 88.9 01/26/201514:05 DAL848 MD80 D 30R 88.9 01/01/201513:41 DAL2096 MD80 D 30R 88.6 01/22/201513:36 DAL848 MD80 D 30R 88.3 01/03/2015 20:00 DAL1274 MD80 D 30R 88.1 01/01/201515:53 DAL1082 MD80 D 30R 87.7 01/01/201515:55 DAL2196 MD80 D 30R 87.6 01/23/201510:24 DAL1496 MD80 D 30R 87.5 (RMT Site #9) Saratoga St. & Hartford Ave., St. Paul Date/Time Flight Number Aircraft Type Arrival/ Departure Runway Lmax(dB) 01/27/2015 7:03 BMJ48 BE65 D 04 78 01/07/201518:33 FLG3652 CRJ2 A 22 763 01/28/2015 7:17 BMJ66 BE80 D 12L 763 01/03/2015 7:28 BMJ66 BE80 D 12L 73.9 01/16/2015 6:32 BMJ72 BE65 D 12R 71.7 01/16/2015 6:35 BMJ66 BE80 D 12R 71.6 01/17/20157:28 BMJ70 BE65 D 12R 71 01/31/2015 9:46 DAL1652 8738 D 30L 71 01/25/2015 8:42 DAL2198 8739 D 30R 70.9 01/30/2015 6:42 BMJ62 BE65 D 12L 70.6 Report Generated: 02/11/2015 13 :20 — - _25. Top Ten Loudest Aircraft Noise Events for MSP January 2015 (RMT Site #10) Itasca Ave. & Bowdoin St., St, Paul Date /Time Flight Number Aircraft Type Arrival/ Departure Runway Lmax(dB) 01/27/2015 7:02 BMJ48 BE65 D 04 87.4 01/07/201518:34 FLG3652 CRJ2 A 22 80,6 01/17/2015 7:19 BMJ66 BE80 D 12R 777 01/22/201516:46 N282EA BE58 D 12R 72.4 01/08/201512:32 FLG3680 CRJ9 A 30L 69.4 01/17/2015 7:21 BMJ64 BE65 D 12R 67.7 (RMT Site #11) Finn St. & Scheffer Ave., St. Paul Date /Time Flight Number Aircraft Type Arrival/ Departure Runway Lmax(dB) 01/27/2015 7:02 BMJ48 BE65 D 04 74.5 01/31/2015 9:11 FLG3762 CRJ9 D 30R 73.4 01/17/2015 7:20 BMJ66 BE80 D 12R 73.1 01/31/2015 9:46 DAL1652 B738 D 30L 71.7 01/24/2015 7:24 BMJ48 BE65 D 30L 70.1 01/14/201511:32 FLG3441 CRJ9 D 30R 69.9 01/07/2015 7:49 BMJ48 BE65 D 30R 69.7 01/12/201514:24 AWE814 E190 D 30R 69 (RMT Site #12) Alton St. & Rockwood Ave., St. Paul Date /Time Flight Number Aircraft Type Arrival/ Departure Runway Lmax(dB) 01/17/2015 7:27 BMJ70 BE65 D 12R 80.8 01/08/2015 8:20 ASQ5259 CRJ9 A 12L 78.5 01/02/2015 7:54 BMJ59 BE65 D 12L 75.6 01/28/2015 7:06 BMJ48 BE65 D 12L 75.3 01/02/2015 9 :25 BMJ68 BE65 D 12L 75.1 01/28/2015 7:17 BMJ66 BE80 D 12L 74.9 01/03/2015 7:28 BMJ66 BE80 D 12L 73.8 01/28/201518:16 CPZ5744 El 70 A 12L 73.1 01/16/2015 6:34 BMJ66 BE80 D 12R 71.6 01/02/2015 7:23 BMJ48 BE65 D 12L 71.2 .26- Report Generated: 02/11/2015 13:20 Top Ten Loudest Aircraft Noise Events for MSP January 2015 (RMT Site #13) Southeast end of Mohican Court, Mendota Heiqhts Date /Time flight Number Aircraft Type Arrival/ Departure Runway Lmax(dB) 01/19/201513:33 DAL848 MD80 D 12L 84.4 01/30/201513:34 DAL848 MD80 D 12L 82.8 01/28/201514:12 DAL848 MD80 D 12L 81.2 01/25/201513:29 DAL848 MD80 D 12L 81.1 01/20/201513:33 DAL848 MD80 D 12L 81 01/05/201513:36 DAL848 MD80 D 12L 80.9 01/13/201513:36 DAL848 MD80 D 12L 80.8 01/26/2015 6:02 AAL1249 MD80 D 12R 80.2 01/31/2015 20:09 DAL 1624 MD80 D 12L 80 01/16/201513:39 DAL848 MD80 D 12L 79.9 (RMT Site #14) 1 st St. & McKee St., Eagan Date /Time Flight Number Aircraft Type Arrival/ Departure Runway Lmax(dB) 01/03/20156:25 AAL1249 MD80 D 12R 89.9 01/16/2015 6:29 DAL783 MD80 D 12R 89.6 01/17/2015 6:17 AAL1249 MD80 D 12R 89 01/03/2015 6:29 AAL2253 MD80 D 12R 883 01/17/2015 7:08 AAL2253 MD80 D 12R 88 01/31/201519:02 AAL1116 MD80 D 12L 87.3 01/20/201 5 1 1;04 DAL1496 MD80 D 12R 86.9 01/26/2015 6:30 DAL783 MD80 D 12R 86.4 01/03/2015 8:37 AAL1301 MD80 D 12R 86.4 01/19/2015 23:10 N697BJ DC9Q D 12R 86.1 (RMT Site #15) Cullon St. & Lexington Ave., Mendota Heiqhts Date/Time Flight Number. Aircraft Type - Arrival/ Departure Runway Lmax(dB) , 01/28/201514:11 DAL848 MD80 D 12L 87 01/13/201513:35 DAL848 MD80 D 12L 85.9 01/30/2015 7:08 BMJ66 BE80 D 12L 85.8 01/30/201513:33 DAL848 MD80 D 12L 84.9 01/30/2015 7:13 BMJ24 BE65 D 12L 84.8 01/16/201513:39 DAL848 MD80 D 12L 83.3 01/02/2015 7:32 BMJ25 BE80 D 12L 83 01/22/201518:03 DAL1235 8738 D 12L 82.8 01/02/201516:40 ASA37 B7377 D 12L 82.1 01/22/201510:07 DAL819 A320 A 30R 81.8 Report Generated: 02 /11/2015 13:20 -27- Top Ten Loudest Aircraft Noise Events for MSP January 2015 (RMT Site #16) Avalon Ave. & Vilas Ln., Eagan Date /Time Flight Number Aircraft Type Arrival/ Departure Runway Lmax(dB) 01/22/201512 :26 DAL1212 B757 A 30L 97.1 01/04/201511:28 DAL2314 B757 A 30L 94.8 01/03/2015 20:58 DAL2374 B757 A 30L 94.1 01/01/2015 8:17 DAL1574 8757 A 30L 93.9 01/08/201519:30 BMJ37 BE65 A 30L 91.7 01/06/2015 5:41 DAL1450 B757 A 30L 91.3 01/25/201513:41 DAL 1712 MD80 D 12R 90.4 01/31/201516:32 AAL1430 MD80 D 12R 90 01/04/2015 21:49 DAL2637 B757 A 30L 89.7 01/21/201516:27 DAL2540 B757 A 30L 89.4 (RMT Site #17) 84th St. & 4th Ave., Bloomington Date /Time Flight Number Aircraft Type Arrival/ Departure Runway Lmax(dB) 01/12/2015 6:25 DAL783 MD80 D 30L 82.9 01/23/2015 9:17 DAL515 A320 D 30L 76.2 01/22/2015 9:03 DAL1714 B763 D 30L 75.9 01/22/2015 7:25 DAL501 B738 D 30L 75.3 01/14/2015 6:13 UPS496 B757 D 17 75.2 01/17/2015 9:58 DAL331 A320 D 30L 75.2 01/10/2015 6:15 AAL1249 MD80 D 30L 74.8 01/23/2015 8:38 SCX381 B738 D 30L 74.6 01/26/2015 8:33 CPZ5791 E170 D 30L 74.4 01/12/2015 6:23 SCX527 B738 D 30L 74.4 (RMT Site #18) 75th. St. & 17th Ave., Richfield Date /Time flight Number Aircraft Type Arrival/ Departure Runway Lmax(dB) 01/05/201514:55 DAL1781 B757 D 17 89 01/12/201519:14 BMJ37 BE65 A 04 88.6 01/28/2015 7:09 DAL1632 MD80 D 17 88.6 01/28/201510:22 DAL1496 MD80 D 17 86 01/28/201510:12 DAL2413 MD80 D 17 84.4 01/08/201510:24 DAL2413 MD80 D 17 83.9 01/08/201510:20 DAL1496 MD80 D 17 83.6 01/30/201515:12 DAL1664 MD80 D 17 83.5 01/16/2015 7:48 FDX645 MD11 D 17 83.2 01/28/201518:35 DAL2551 MD80 D 17 82.9 _ 28 - - Report Generated: 02/11 /2015 13:20 Top Ten Loudest Aircraft Noise Events for MSP January 2015 (RMT Site #19) 16th Ave. & 84th St., Bloominqton Date /Time Flight Number Aircraft 'Type Arrival/ Departure Runway Lmax(dB) 01/26/2015 10:14 DAU 103 B757 D 17 84 01/22/201517:04 SCX609 B738 D 17 83.2 01/16/201510:22 DAL2413 MD80 D 17 81.5 01/03/201511:28 DAL1734 MD80 D 17 80.4 01/16/201519:06 AAL1116 MD80 D 17 80.3 01/03/2015 9:25 DAL1329 MD80 D 17 80 01/03/201510:32 DAL2468 MD80 D 17 80 01/19/201516:37 AAL1430 MD80 D 17 79.9 01/22/201518:02 DAL2551 MD80 D 17 1 79.8 01/16/201515:09 DAL1664 MD80 D 17 79.7 (RMT Site #20) 75th St. & 3rd Ave., Richfield Date /Time Flight Number Aircraft Type Arrival/ Departure Runway Lmax(dB) 01/12/2015 6:25 DAL783 MD80 D 30L 87 01/23/2015 8:31 AAL1301 MD80 D 30L 81.4 01/26/201510:30 DAL371 A320 D 30L 80.1 01/14/2015 8:18 DAL1573 A320 D 30L 80 01/05/201511:02 DAL1714 8763 D 30L 79.9 01/10/2015 6:15 AAL1249 MD80 D 30L 79.8 01/22/2015 9:03 DAL 1714 B763 D 30L 79.4 01/26/2015 8:33 CPZ5791 E170 D 30L 79.1 01/23/2015 9:33 DAL2168 B763 D 30L 78.8 01/23/20156:29 DAL783 MD80 D 30L 78.7 (RMT Site #21) Barbara Ave. & 67th St., Inver Grove Heights Date/Time Flight Number Aircraft T ype Arrival/ Departure Runway Lmax(dB) 01/19/201513:33 DAL848 MD80 D 12L 82 01/20/201513:33 DAL848 MD80 D 12L 79.4 01/27/201511:44 DAL584 B777 D 12R 78.2 01/11/201513:34 DAL848 MD80 D 12L 77 01/03/201511:41 DAL584 B777 D 12R 76.4 01/16/201513:40 DAL848 MD80 D 12L 75.4 01/19/2015 9:40 DAL2168 B763 D 12R 74.9 01/30/201513:34 DAL848 MD80 D 12L 74.8 01/30/201518:18 DAL12 B764 D 12R 74.5 01/16/201518:30 DAL12 B764 D 12R 74.5 Report Generated: 02 /11/2015 13:20 - - -29- Top Ten Loudest Aircraft Noise Events for MSP January 2015 (RMT Site #22) Anne Marie Trail, Inver Grove Heiqhts Date /Time Flight Number Aircraft Type Arrival/ Departure Runway Lmax(dB) 01/26/2015 6:31 DAL783 MD80 D 1'2R 81.7 01/04/2015 21:46 DAL2637 B757 A 30L 80.9 01/26/2015 6:03 AAL1249 MD80 D 12R 78.3 01/17/2015 6:18 AAL1249 MD80 D 12R 78.1 01/22/201511:58 DAL2566 MD90 A 30L 78.1 01/03/2015 6:30 AAL2253 MD80 D 12R 77.8 01/25/201513:43 DAL1712 MD80 D 12R 77.8 01/07/2015 6:01 FDX1407 MD11 A 30L 77.5 01/16/2015 6:30 DAL783 MD80 D 12R 77.4 01/27/2015 5:41 FDX1407 MD11 A 30L 77 (RMT Site #23) End of Kenndon Ave., Mendota Heights Date /Time Flight Number Aircraft Type Arrival/ Departure Runway Lmax(dB) 01/05/201513:35 DAL848 MD80 D 12L 92.1 01/20/201513:32 DAL848 MD80 D 12L 92 01/30/201513:33 DAL848 MD80 D 12L 92 01/19/201513:32 DAL848 MD80 D 12L 91.8 01/28/201514:11 DAL848 MD80 D 12L 91 01/16/201513:39 DAL848 MD80 D 12L 90.9 01/11/201513 :33 DAL848 MD80 D 12L 89.9 01/13/201513:35 DAL848 MD80 D 12L 89.9 01/03/2015 6:34 DAL2409 MD80 D 12L 89.3 01/31/201515:54 DAL1864 MD80 D 12L 89.1 (RMT Site #24) Chapel Ln. & Wren Ln., Eagan Date/Time Flight Number Aircraft Type Arrival/ Departure Runway Lmax(dB) 01/17/2015 6:17 AAL1249 MD80 D 12R 843 01/17/2015 7:08 AAL2253 MD80 D 12R 83.8 01/31/201519:02 AAL1116 MD80 D 12L 83.6 01/16/2015 6:30 DAL783 MD80 D 12R 83.3 01/23/2015 4:58 UPS560 MD11 A 30L 82.6 01/17/2015 7:31 DAL501 A320 D 12R 82.4 01/23/2015 5:51 FDX1718 MD11 A 30L 81.9 01/26/2015 6:30 DAL783 MD80 D 12R 81.8 01/20/201511:04 DAL1496 MD80 D 12R 81.6 01/02/201519:28 DAL1274 MD80 D 12L 81.5 .30- A x I Report Generated: 02 /11/201513:20 Top Ten Loudest Aircraft Noise Events for MSP January 2015 (RMT Site #25) Moonshine Park 1321 Jurdy Rd., Eaqan Date /Time Flight Number Aircraft Type Arrival/ Departure .Runway Lmax(dB) 01/31/201517:54 AAL2302 MD80 D 12R 80.1 01/30/201512:30 DAL2134 B763 D 12R 80 01/31/201515:55 AAL2230 MD80 D 12R 78.9 01/31/201516:32 AAL1430 MD80 D 12R 78.6 01/10/201512:14 DAL2096 MD80 D 17 78.6 01/25/201513:42 DAL1712 MD80 D 12R 78.2 01/16/2015 20:12 DAL1615 A320 D 12R 78 01/25/201512:02 AAL1218 MD80 D 12R 77.5 01/02/2015 20:19 DAL1596 A320 D 17 77.3 01/31/201517:29 DAL2161 MD80 D 12R 77.2 (RMT Site #26) 6796 Arkansas Ave. W., Inver Grove Heiqhts Date /Time Flight Number Aircraft Type Arrival/ Departure Runway Lmax(dB) 01/26/2015 6:02 AAL1249 MD80 D 12R 82.3 01/02/201519:28 DAL1274 MD80 D 12L 81.6 01/11/201513:34 DAL848 MD80 D 12L 81.4 01/20/201513:33 DAL848 MD80 D 12L 81 01/03/2015 9:45 DAL1815 MD80 D 12L 80.6 01/03/2015 6:35 DAL2409 MD80 D 12L 80.5 01/02/201518:11 DAL1505 8763 D 12L 80.3 01/19/2015 6:11 AAL1249 MD80 D 12R 80.1 01/25/201513:30 DAL848 MD80 D 12L 80 01/19/201513:33 DAL848 MD80 D 12L 79.9 (RMT Site #27) Anthony School 5757 Irvinq Ave. S., Minneapolis Date/Time Flight Number Aircraft Type Arrival/ Departure Runway Lmax(dB) 01/25/2015 7:46 DAL2587 MD80 D 30L 88.2 01/24/201512:02 AAL1218 MD80 D 30L 87.9 01/01/201513:26 DAL1484 MD80 D 30L 87.1 01/25/2015 6:30 DAL783 MD80 D 30L 87 01/31/201512:29 AAL1218 MD80 D 30L 86.8 01/29/201516:06 AAL2230 MD80 D 30L 86.5 01/24/201510:03 DAL1705 MD80 D 30L 86.3 01/31/2015 7:28 DAL2587 MD80 D 30L 86.1 01/19/201516:59 AAL2302 MD80 A 12R 85.8 01/07/201510:25 DAL2345 MD80 D 30L 85.8 - Report Generated: 02/11/2015 13:20 -_r _ _ - _ - I - - - - .31 - Top Ten Loudest Aircraft Noise Events for MSP January 2015 (RMT Site #28) 6645 16th Ave. S., Richfield Date /Time Flight Number Aircraft Type Arrival/ Departure Runway Lmax(dB) 01/04/2015 8:40 AAL2253 MD80 D 30L 90 01/29/201510:40 DAL2413 MD80 D 30L 88.9 01/03/201518:44 AAL2306 MD80 D 30L 88.4 01/17/201516:43 AAL1430 MD80 D 30L 87.8 01/30/201518:18 DAL2551 MD80 D 17 86 01/25/2015 7:36 AAL301Q MD80 D 30L 85.8 01/15/201519:12 AAL1116 MD80 D 30L 85.7 01/18/201516:51 AAL1430 MD80 D 30L 85.7 01/28/201510:11 DAL2413 MD80 D 17 85.2 01/26/201517:45 DAL2551 MD80 D 30L 84.9 (RMT Site #29) Ericsson Elem. School 4315 31st Ave. S., Minneapolis Date /Time Flight Number Aircraft Type Arrival/ Departure Runway Lmax(dB) 01/14/201513:33 DAL848 MD80 D 30R 86.6 01/29/201514:15 DAL848 MD80 D 30R 85.8 01/04/201518:16 DAL2296 MD80 D 30R 85.6 01/26/201510:26 DAL1496 MD80 D 30R 85.3 01/29/2015 7:21 BMJ48 BE65 D 30R 84.3 01/22/201510:26 DAL1496 MD80 D 30R 84.1 01/06/201510:19 DAL1496 MD80 D 30R 833 01/29/201510:29 DAL1496 MD80 D 30R 83 01/04/201514:18 DAL2096 MD80 D 30R 82.7 01/01/201513:41 DAL2096 MD80 D 30R 82.2 (RMT Site #30) 8715 River Ridge Rd., Bloomington Date /Time Flight Number Aircraft Type Arrival/ Departure Runway Lmax(dB) 01/31/2015 6:50 DAL783 MD80 D 17 90.8 01/02/2015 6:10 AAL1249 MD80 D 17 90.5 01/16/201518:44 DAL2551 MD80 D 17 90.3 01/20/201513:27 AAL1218 MD80 D 17 90 01/16/2015 7:19 AAL2253 MD80 D 17 89,7 01/31/2015 6:17 AAL1249 MD80 D 17 89.6 01/16/201514:15 AAL1633 MD80 D 17 89.6 01/16/201510:22 DAL2413 MD80 D 17 89.5 01/30/201516:02 AAL2230 MD80 D 17 89.2 01/18/201520:33 DAL2161 MD80 D 17 89.2 .32- Report Generated: 02/11/2015 13:20 Top Ten Loudest Aircraft Noise Events for MSP January 2015 (RMT Site #31) 9501 12th Ave. S., Bloominqton Date /Time Flight Number Aircraft Type Arrival/ Departure Runway Lmax(dB) 01/23/201514 :04 AAL1633 MD80 D 17 84.2 01/19/2015 7:24 AAL2253 MD80 D 17 827 01/30/2015 9:17 UAL210 A320 D 17 82.6 01/20/201513:28 AAL1218 MD80 D 17 81.1 01/28/201514:29 AAL1633 MD80 D 17 80.2 01/16/201512:06 AAL1218 MD80 D 17 80.2 01/13/201511:59 AAL1218 MD80 D 17 80.1 01/27/201515:57 AAL2230 MD80 D 17 79.9 01/12/2015 6:26 DAL783 MD80 D 30L 79.6 01/16/201517:57 AAL2302 MD80 D 17 79.5 (RMT Site #32) 10325 Pleasant Ave. S., Bloomington Date/Time Flight Number Aircraft Type Arrival/ Departure Runway Lmax(dB) 01/23/201514:04 AAL1633 MD80 D 17 83.2 01/23/2015 14:52 DAL899 A320 D 17 78.5 01/14/2015 7 :54 DAL1291 MD80 D 30L 77 01/22/2015 8:02 DAL1573 A320 D 17 76.7 01/03/201513:40 DAL2464 MD80 D 30L 76.4 01/19/2015 7:24 AAL2253 MD80 D 17 76.1 01/16/201517:57 AAL2302 MD80 D 17 76 01/26/2015 7:25 DAL1851 A320 D 17 75.6 01/23/201514:48 AWE483 A319 D 17 75 01/27/201515:58 AAL2230 MD80 D 17 74.6 (RMT Site #33) North River Hills Park, Burnsville Date/Time Flight Number Aircraft Type Arrival/ Departure Runway Lmax(dB) 01/02/201512:01 DAL2115 MD80 D 17 83.5 01/14/201513:55 AAL1633 MD80 D 17 83 01/20/2015 20:05 AAL2302 MD80 D 17 82.4 01/23/201512:03 AAL1218 MD80 D 17 82.1 01/22/201518:03 DAL2551 MD80 D 17 81.6 01/01/2015 6:38 AAL2253 MD80 D 17 81.5 01/22/201513:57 AAL1633 MD80 D 17 80.3 01/05/201518:30 DAL2551 MD80 D 17 79.9 01/02/201514:06 AAL1633 MD80 D 17 79.7 01/18/2015 6:11 AAL1249 MD80 D 17 79.3 Report Generated: 02 /11/2015 13:20 _ - - , - _ - 33 - - - Top Ten Loudest Aircraft Noise Events for MSP January 2015 (RMT Site #34) Red Oak Park, Burnsville Date /Time Flight Number Aircraft Type Arrival/ Departure Runway Lmax(dB) 01/22/201518:03 DAL2551 MD80 D 17 803 01/18/2015 6:11 AAL1249 MD80 D 17 80.1 01/08/2015 8:59 AAL1301 MD80 D 17 78.2 01/02/2015 6:11 AAL1249 MD80 D 17 77.5 01/20/201518:36 DAL999 MD90 D 17 77.4 01/02/201512:01 DAL2115 MD80 D 17 77.1 01/14/201516:44 AAL1430 MD80 D 17 77 01/27/201513:55 AAL1633 MD80 D 17 76 01/27/2015 6:35 DAL783 MD80 D 17 76 01/03/2015 9:43 DAL972 B763 D 17 76 (RMT Site #35) 2100 Garnet Ln., Eagan Date /Time Flight Number Aircraft Type Arrival/ Departure Runway Lmax(dB) 01/26/201510:17 DAL2413 MD80 D 17 87 01/31/2015 6:51 DAL783 MD80 D 17 86.1 01/15/2015 6:29 DAL783 MD80 D 17 85.4 01/17/2015 9:44 DAL1705 MD80 D 17 85.3 01/28/2015 8:31 AAL1301 MD80 D 17 84.4 01/05/2015 6:36 DAL783 MD80 D 17 83.9 0.1/15/2015 6:06 AAL1249 MD80 D 17 83.2 01/14/2015 6:17 AAL1249 MD80 D 17 82 01/30/201516:47 AAL1430 MD80 D 17 81.5 01/17/2015 9:38 DAL515 A320 D 17 81.2 (RMT Site #36) Briar Oaks & Scout Pond, Apple Valley Date /Time Flight Number Aircraft Type Arrival/ Departure Runway Lmax(dB) 01/26/201510:17 DAL2413 MD80 D 17 84.6 01/07/201510:20 DAL1544 MD90 A 35 83.7 01/31/2015 6:19 AAL1249 MD80 D 17 81.4 01/04/201517:14 FDX728 MD11 A 35 81.2 0/724/2015 6:12 AAL1249 MD80 D 17 81 01/07/201513:28 AAY8501 MD80 A 35 80.7 01/17/2015 9:44 DAL1705 MD80 D 17 79.9 01/29/201517:37 FDX715 MD11 A 35 79.6 01/23/201518:14 FDX715 MD11 A 35 79.6 01/20/2015 5:53 FDX1718 MD11 A 35 79.1 -34. ..r ;:;:, Report Generated: 02/11/2015 13:20 -- -- - -' Top Ten Loudest Aircraft Noise Events for MSP January 2015 (RMT Site #37) 4399 Woodgate Ln. N., Eagan Date /Time Flight Number Aircraft Type Arrival/ Departure Runway Lmax(dB) 01/15/2015 6:29 DAL783 MD80 D 17 81.9 01/20/201519:40 AAL1116 MD80 D 17 81.4 01/31/2015 6:51 DAL783 MD80 D 17 81.3 01/27/201517:01 AAL1430 MD80 D 17 80,6 01/14/201519:27 AAL1116 MD80 D 17 80.5 01/27/201510:16 DAL2413 MD80 D 17 80.3 01/22/201519:11 AAL1116 MD80 D 17 79.8 01/19/201518:59 AAL1116 MD80 D 17 79.8 01/28/2015 7:11 DAL 1632 MD80 D 17 79.4 01/02/201511:49 DAL1975 MD80 D 17 79.1 (RMT Site #38) 3957 Turquoise Cir., Eagan Date /Time ' Flight Number Aircraft Type Arrival/ Departure Runway Lmax(dB) 01/02/201511:49 DAL1975 MD80 D 17 84.8 01/19/201516:38 AAL1430 MD80 D 17 84.5 01/19/201518:59 AAL1116 MD80 D 17 84.4 01/20/201516:42 AAL1430 MD80 D 17 83.3 01/14/201519:27 AAL1116 MD80 D 17 83.2 01/28/201519:34 AAL1116 MD80 D 17 83 01/03/2015 9:26 DAL1329 MD80 D 17 82,8 01/28/2015 7:10 DAL 1632 MD80 D 17 82.7 01102/201516:46 1 AAL1430 MD80 I D 17 82.7 01/27/201517:01 1 AAL1430 I MD80 I D 17 82.3 (RMT Site #39) 3477 St. Charles PI., Eagan Date /Time Flight Number Aircraft Type Arrival /'' Departure Runway Lmax(dB) 01/19/201510:43 DAL1496 MD80 D 17 86 01/03/201511:45 DAL1975 MD80 D 17 85.7 01/02/201519:36 DAL721 MD80 D 17 84.9 01/03/201510:33 DAL2468 MD80 D 17 84.9 01/30/201516:38 DAL787 MD80 D 17 84,2 01/02/201513:38 DAL2096 MD80 D 17 83.2 01/03/201511:29 DAL1734 MD80 D 17 82.8 01/02/201511:22 DAL1734 MD80 D 17 82.8 01/10/201513:22 AAL1458 MD80 D 17 82.7 01/08/201510:21 DAL1496 MD80 D 17 82.2 January 2015 Remote Monitoring Tower Top Ten Summary The top ten noise events and the event ranges at each RMT for January 2015 were comprised of 81.8% departure operations. The predominant top ten aircraft type was the MD80 with 66.4% of the highest Lmax events. January 2015 Technical Advisor Report Notes Unknown fields are due to unavailability of multilateration flight track data. Report Generated: 02/11/2015 13:20 _ 35 Analysis of Aircraft Noise Events DNL January 2015 Remote Monitoring Towers Date #1 #2 #3 #4 #5 #6 #7 #8 #9 #10 #11 #12 #13 #14 #15 01/01/15 45.5 47.4 52.7 53.4 62.9 64.5 59.9 56.5 28 NA NA NA NA 56.1 40.5 01/02/15 55.2 57.8 63.5 58.1 66.8 64.1 44.3 44.2 NA NA NA 39.5 54.7 58.2 57.2 01/03/15 55.1 56.3 62.6 57.9 67.2 66.1 60 54.7 32.6 NA NA 34.8 52 64.2 52.9 01/04/15 44.1 47.6 55.4 57.3 66.1 64.8 60.9 53.4 NA NA NA NA NA 56.4 NA 01/05/15 47.1 54.9 60.8 55.1 65.9 63.7 52 48 NA NA NA NA 49.6 58.9 51.5 01/06/15 38.2 40.3 46 48.9 64.3 62.3 60.2 53.2 NA NA NA NA NA 56.5 40.3 01/07/15 43.6 46.7 50.3 53.2 64.5 63.5 61.3 51.9 35.6 38.1 29.1 NA NA 56.2 35.5 01/08/15 50.5 54.6 59.7 53.6 65.1 63 56.6 51.4 NA 28 NA 36.3 48.6 56.8 47.8 01/09/15 37.8 43.3 49.3 50.4 63.3 61.5 60.9 51.4 NA NA NA 27.1 NA 54.4 NA 01/10/15 45.5 51.2 55 51.3 62.3 60.8 54.6 47.2 NA NA NA NA 43.4 52.4 47 01711/15 44.2 50 54.9 53.5 64.2 63 59,2 51.4 26.8 NA NA NA 40.6 53.5 41.9 01/12/15 46.6 52.9 58.1 53.8 65.7 64.1 59.4 52.5 27.4 NA 283 NA 43.4 53.2 47 01/13/15 51.5 55.3 61.1 55.5 64,9 62.8 39.7 28.8 NA NA NA 39.4 50.2 57.6 55.7 01/14/15 53.2 55.6 59.4 56.3 63.3 65.3 50.7 54.8 NA NA 30.3 NA 50.7 57.4 52.1 01/15/15 47.4 52.6 53.5 56.6 63.8 66.1 61.7 55.6 NA NA NA NA 32.2 58.7 38.9 01/16/15 57.2 60.3 63.6 59.6 66.7 65.3 52.6 31.2 46.2 NA NA 43.9 52.7 61.6 57.7 01/17/15 53.3 53.9 58.6 55.5 63.6 63.1 57.1 52.7 32.4 38.5 34.6 40.9 32.1 64.4 35.1 01/18/15 46.6 48.2 52.5 54 63.4 64.1 60.8 55.9 26.8 NA NA NA NA 56.3 34.9 01/19/15 57.3 60.8 63.6 60.5 67.1 66.4 35.5 33.4 NA NA NA NA 56.5 62.3 57 01/20/15 56.7 58.9 63.8 58.4 66.8 64.3 44.3 31 NA NA NA NA 54.4 60.2 56.5 01/21/15 49.6 50.6 57.3 54.6 66.2 66.2 62 56.5 NA NA NA NA 38 57.6 41.7 01/22/15 55.4 55.6 62.7 56.6 67.2 66 60.1 54.4 NA 31 NA NA 52.7 59.5 56.3 01/23/15 48.4 49.2 57.5 55.6 64.9 66 60.2 56.6 NA NA NA NA NA 59.6 32.3 01/24115 55 53 61.5 55 67.3 63.7 59.3 51.8 28.5 NA 31.5 NA 42.7 56.2 42.7 01/25/15 52.3 56.3 61.7 58.1 68.1 64.9 60.3 49.2 30.2 NA NA NA 49.2 57 50.1 01 /26/15 53.3 55.7 59.5 56.8 65.8 65.9 61.8 56.2 NA NA NA NA 53.7 61.1 52.5 01/27/15 55.6 60 62.4 60.1 66.9 66.6 55.4 45.5 38.6 45.5 34.9 NA 50.2 57.4 54.5 01/28115 56.3 59.8 65.7 60 69.5 66.2 38.5 47.9 34.6 NA NA 40.4 54.1 58.9 55.5 01/29/15 44.9 46.3 53.1 53.5 65.5 65.9 64 54.4 29.4 NA NA NA 32.8 59.4 38 01/30/15 55.6 57.4 62.1 57.9 66 64.2 49.6 30.8 43.2 NA NA NA 55.1 61.1 58.4 01/31/15 51 A 54.4 60.6 56.5 66.5 63.2 59 48 29.9 NA 34.8 NA 48.9 59.7 504 Mo.DNL 52.7 55.5 '60.4 56.5 65.9 64.7 58.9 515 -34.4 312 263 318 50 59A 52.4 36 Report Generated: 02/11/2015 13:20 Analysis of Aircraft Noise Events DNL January 2015 Remote Monitoring Towers Date #16 #17 #18 #19 #20 #21 #22 #23 #24 #25 #26 #27 #28 1 #29 01/01/15 62.5 31.1 47.9 44.6 41.5 NA 50,8 41.6 56.1 NA 28.9 53.5 54.1 51.5 01/02/15 61.9 NA 55.7 50.7 NA 43.5 50.4 61 56.1 51.1 49.7 NA 52 NA 01/03/15 64.3 36.1 51.1 47.2 41.2 44.7 56.1 61.6 60.7 50.4 57.2 '54.1 58.2 49.6 01/04/15 64.4 NA 30.7 NA 39.9 NA 49.2 NA 56.5 31.3 31.2 56.5 55.2 52 01/05/15 63.8 41.9 51.5 45 45.9 45 51.1 58.7 56.9 41.1 52.5 43.6 50.9 47.2 01/06/15 65.7 NA 27.1 43.4 NA 30.4 50.1 36.6 57.5 29.9 33.4 51.7 53.3 49.4 01/07/15 65.3 NA 35 NA NA 30.3 50.6 40.8 56.2 37.3 33.3 52.5 53.8 52.1 01/08/15 62.6 28.7 50.7 41.3 36 38.9 48 57.1 55.6 44 52.2 51.2 53 49.2 01/09/15 63 40.3 35.1 31 46.9 NA 47.4 28.8 55.3 40.5 30.1 51.6 53.6 49.3 01/10/15 60.5 47.3 52.3 47.6 51.1 30.3 46.8 50.5 50.9 43 41.1 49.4 50.8 43.2 01/11/15 60.9 28.1 41.5 36.2 29.4 39.6 47.2 50.6 53.5 NA 41.6 54.3 51.2 45.6 01/12/15 61.1 52.9 46.3 44.3 56.8 NA 44 52.5 50.6 39.7 30 52.7 56.6 46.7 01/13/15 59.5 NA 50.4 44 NA 33,1 48.2 60.1 54.2 45.7 51.6 313 48.1 NA 01/14/15 62.3 46.7 54.9 53.4 45.7 40.1 50.8 57.9 56.4 46.6 45.6 39.8 48.7 52.2 01/15/15 64.6 NA 52.6 52.2 45.9 NA 55.5 49.8 58.5 38.8 43.1 53.1 56 56.1 01/16/15 64.1 NA 57.9 55.6 NA 42.3 53.4 61.3 58.5 56.2 50.7 40.2 58,3 NA 01/17/15 64.6 38.4 45.2 40.7 44.9 31.4 55.2 55.2 62 44 53.3 48.2 52.1 49.7 01/18/15 61.8 42.8 46.2 49.4 45.2 31.2 52.3 39.5 56.1 NA 33.5 54 54.6 49.5 01/19/15 63.2 NA 55 51.1 NA 51.4 51.3 62.9 58 54.3 57.2 45.4 55.2 NA 01/20/15 62.8 43 54.7 52 47 46.7 49,9 61,7 56.9 52.6 54.5 42.1 54.3 NA 01/21/15 62.6 NA 39.1 NA 33.1 NA 52 50.6 56.6 44.6 41.6 56.6 56.8 51,6 01/22/15 63.5 44 51.9 48.8 47.2 37.2 53.2 58.8 58 49.4 49 53.9 54 53.1 01/23/15 64.8 47.8 55.9 52.5 52.6 29.2 55.4 42.6 60.2 44.9 38.4 53.9 56.6 55 01/24/15 60.6 28.4 50.4 54.5 NA 33.9 52.5 51.6 55.3 41.2 42.1 57 52.1 47.7 01/25/15 60 NA 45.5 37.8 37 39.4 46.6 57.7 53.3 46.6 48.4 58.4 55,2 45.9 01/26/15 63 38.8 48.4 45 47.1 45.6 56.7 60.8 60.1 43.8 56 52.9 56.5 53.4 01/27/15 61.7 34.1 57 54.5 NA 39,1 54 59.1 56.8 45,3 45.5 51.1 57.1 41.6 01/28/15 60.8 NA 56.7 50.6 NA 42.7 47.1 61.7 56.4 54 51.4 34.5 55.4 43.2 01/29/15 63.8 29.2 42.4 32.2 41.1 NA 54.8 38.4 59.4 NA 38.3 55.6 60.9 54.4 01/30/15 62.3 NA 54.5 48.7 NA 41.1 51.6 62.8 577 49.5 50.9 36.6 49 NA 01/31/15 63.5 NA 57 54.7 40.9 40.1 54.1 57.1 57.9 52.8 47.7 55.1 53.4 44.7 Mo.DNL -63 41.8 52:5 1 49.6' 46 41.4 5293 57.8 57.4 4823 5042' 52.8 55 49:9 Report Generated: 02/11/2015 13:20 - - - -- - 37 - Analysis of Aircraft Noise Events DNL January 2015 Remote Monitoring Towers Date #30 #31 #32 #33 #34 #35 #36 #37 #38 #39 01/01/15 59.2 29.5 33.1 52.7 46 51.9 51.6 40.2 NA NA 01/02/15 63.4 46.8 36.2 51.7 48.3 48.1 48.5 46.4 51.4 55.6 01/03/15 56.8 43.1 41.1 42.9 37.1 48.5 51,4 41.5 47.4 50 01/04/15 43.7 NA NA NA NA 45.5 51.1 NA NA NA 01/05/15 62.3 44.6 35.4 42.2 38.5 57.5 49,5 42 48.7 42.9 01/06/15 53.1 NA NA NA NA 49.5 50.4 NA NA NA 01/07/15 43.9 NA NA 29 31.5 43.3 51 NA NA NA 01/08/15 54.6 39.4 NA 42.5 40 44.2 42.8 40.7 45,6 45.4 01/09/15 45.7 NA NA NA NA 44.2 47.3 NA NA NA 01/10/15 59 46.2 27 43.8 36.9 49 45,1 40.2 44.3 48.7 01/11/15 49.9 NA NA 36.2 NA 43.6 48.6 29 42.4 41.8 01/12/15 36.8 48.6 NA 38.4 26.7 46 49.3 41.7 42,7 31.4 01/13/15 56.9 43.3 NA 43.8 33.2 47.6 48.9 40.1 46.2 46 01/14/15 63.9 49.2 45.3 50.5 46.8 55.8 52 45.6 47.9 44 01/15/15 62.5 44.8 32 NA 32.7 59.5 56.6 53.4 50 NA 01/16/15 64.8 52.6 45.5 52.3 49.6 49.2 35.3 46.8 51 50.3 01/17/15 56.7 39.8 31.6 47.2 44.2 53.9 52.8 43.9 37.1 NA 01/18/15 62.6 47.8 43.7 52.7 52.7 52.2 53.7 NA NA NA 01/19/15 61.3 47.5 4131 48 34.3 45.8 NA 49.1 52.8 52 01/20/15 61.6 46.7 37.5 46.7 40.9 50.4 52.7 49.3 53.3 46.7 01/21/15 45.3 NA NA NA NA 47.7 50.7 NA NA NA 01/22/15 60.6 49.1 42.4 49.4 44.3 49.1 38.7 42.8 45.3 48.6 01 /23/15 63.3 51.1 47.1 49 46.2 57.4 51.9 47.2 47.1 NA 01/24/15 65.2 49.4 45.1 50.6 46.9 58 57.1 46.7 39.8 NA 01/25/15 51.6 35.9 NA 34.9 29.8 45.1 49.5 39.3 45.3 40.2 01/26/15 57 42.7 37.3 43.2 41.2 54 54.2 41.9 42.2 NA 01/27/15 65.2 52.4 48 49.6 50.4 54 52 47.4 51.4 46.3 01/28/15 60.5 46 40.8 39.9 34.9 47.3 34.4 46.5 51 46.8 01/29/15 47.4 NA NA 29.8 NA 50.8 54.3 NA NA NA 01/30/15 60.5 463 39.6 47.3 39.4 52.2 53.1 46.5 51.2 52.1 01/31/15 65.8 47.8 26.5 47.5 46.1 60 56.2 53.1 43.6 NA M o.D N L 60.7 46.4 40.3 47.1 44.1 53.1 5197 45.6 473 463 . .. .38- - - - Report Generated: 02/1`1/2015 13 :20 4 4 Q Minneapolis 12L /30R Minneapolis 12R/301. Richfield Report Generated: 02 /11/2015 13:20 - -39.- „.- M RMT 2 li RMT 4 FARMT6 MRIVIT8 M RMT 29 80 .........._-------------- .. ---------- .__......_.......,.__„___._,.,.,.._.,.,......._.,------- , ---- _._....._--- ._ ........... ... .... .............. .....___....,._,...,,..,..,_. µ..,.,.,..,,...,...,__,...__......_........_................_..._.......,,,.,,__... ...._._...__.........,,,.._._,_ 72 ..._.. . ................... ..._, ...... ,___,.,., ............ .....,..__.....,._ ----- _..,.........._ --- __...,...,._._., ....... ,,...._.._.,,,_....,....,.___. _...................._..................._.........__ ..... ........ .._---- ----- ,...._..,,..,,,..............._...... ......_......,,,._..__ ----- ..._ 64 ---.,..,.._------------ _ .................... _...................__...._.__.....,..,,,..__._,,,,...._._,..,,...,...__,...,.. ._......._..................... __,___...:,....,,_..._---- ...,...,. .,..._,.,.,.,..,__._ .... _.......... __,._,._ „,,,,..._._.........._. ........ ,. 56 .......... .. - ......:. .....................__,,._.... ,_,. . ,.,,,._..,....,,............._: .. ... ..... .. ---- .._...._. ...,.. - ._..,...,,. _._.,. ..,......_ ....:. .. ..__..... .............,. 48 .................................. ............................... ............................................................. ................. . ............................ ....................................................................................... ........ ..... .... .................... ......................... ............ 40 Jan 10 Jul 10 Jan 11 Jul 11 Jan 12 Jul 12 Jan 13 Jul 13 Jan 14 Jul 14 Jan 15 Richfield Report Generated: 02 /11/2015 13:20 - -39.- „.- z 4 Q 3 p n� w -40- St_ Raul • - Mendota Heights ■RMT 13 O RMT 15 MRMT23 Bloomington 70 .................. __ ....... ,.._.._-------------- _. --- _......_..--------------- _. ........... . .......... .. ... ..................... _...... ._._..,_....... . ------- .._........_..._..,.._......_._.._._...... ._...._....._..__.._._._....._. _. 50. .,i....... :rv.:~ .,1,. ............. ....__..__.._ ..,..,_.------- ------ ._......./ ................... _... �, a._........,•�. .......... _........_,.,.,d� _..._......q......_..._.._ 40 _..� f .......... ........... ... _. ............... :....._..._........, . ......_...._.............. _.....__. ....... _....... ............_..._....._......_. .............. _.....___.... 30 .._,...._ -------- _.._.........,... ............... ......... . ------ __.._..__...._.__.......__.,...____.._......_.............._..._.._._.....__.__..........._......:.._........__..,....__........_...................._..,........._.............. ....._...._..._.- _.......__.... 20 Jan 10 Jul 10 Jan '11 Jul 11 Jan 12 Jul 12 Jan 13 Jul 13 Jan 14 Jul 14 Jan 15 Report Generated: 02/11/2015 13:2G .av - Q 4 Burnsville y Apple Valley M RMT 36 Inver Grave Heights 70 ... ......... _...._..__ ------- _...._.._ _ ___ ....... ..... _ _.._, ,,.__.._.._.____..._ _. _.......__ _._...___ 62 _._._...._....._ ................_,...._....._._...._....__...__........_...._.,_....,......_._........_.._......_...__..__.....___...,_____.._..._____.._ ___ ...._._,..._,,._..__.._..._... ..... r - :.. _. _ ._._ . — ..... r..: ...... 46 .._.,_.,, ._ w. .,,.,.._......._ ............... .... _.. _..,.._ ......., __ , „_ _._ __. ..._,._ ......._ ..... _. _._...,........... _...... _. ... ...._ M....__._....__ ............._...._.._-_. ......._..._._,,,,......._..... - ._ ._....,_,,.._ ,_._. ...... _........_......___. 30 Jan 10 Jul 10 Jan 11 Jul 11 Jan 12 Jul 12 Jan 13 Jul 13 Jan 14 Jul 14 Jan 15 Report - Generated: 02/11/2015-13:20 - - - •_ - 41 -_ _ Ti fL! 64 56 48 Eagan 12/30 ® RMT 14 WRIVITIO FMRMT2,1 M RMT 25 40 Jan 10 Jul 10 Jan 11 Jul 11 Jan 12 Jul 12 Jan 13 Jul 13 Jan 14 Jul 14 Jan 15 70 62 a 54 Q 46 38 Eagan 17135 ® RMT 35 M RMT 37 FARMT38 O RMT 39 30 Jan 10 Jul 10 Jan 11 Jul 11 Jan 12 Jul 12 Jan 13 Jul 13 Jan 14 Jul 14 Jan 15 rI'li►ic, .42- ::: Report Generated: 02/11/2015 13:20 - - 1 s • NV2, X VM Y f � Y F ✓ .� *3 l' r'c 5f ✓ s Al f !i r x FF s s z y.. j- � v • rI'li►ic, .42- ::: Report Generated: 02/11/2015 13:20 - - Metropolitan Airports Commission Top 15 Runway 12L/12R Departure Destinations for January 2015 Airport City Heading #Ops Total Ops YYZ TORONTO 950 80 3 % FAR FARGO 3120 79 2.9% SEA SEATTLE 2780 78 2.9% MOT MINOT 3040 71 2.6% ORD CHICAGO (O'HARE) 1240 67 2.5% BIS BISMARCK 2910 67 2.5% GFK GRAND FORKS 3160 66 2.5% BOS BOSTON 970 61 2.3% YWG WINNIPEG 3300 58 2.2% DLH DULUTH 190 57 2.1% LAX LOS ANGELES 2380 51 1.9% ATL ATLANTA 1490 48 1.8% GRB GREEN BAY 900 48 1.8 % SFO SAN FRANCISCO 2510 44 1.6% ISN WILLISTON a 43 1.6% Monthly Eagan - Mendota Heights Departure Corridor Analysis. Report Generated: 02/11/2015 13:21 Page 5 Runway 17 Carrier Jet Departure Operations - 1/1/2015-1/31/2015 4096 (99.5 %) Westbound Carrier Jet 20 (0.5 %) Carrier Jet Departure Departure Operations flying the Runway 17 Jet Operations turned west before passing over the Departure Procedure (passing over the 2.5 NM turn Runway 17 2.5 NM turn point. This is 1.1% of 1783 point) and Runway 17 eastbound Carrier Jet westbound departures Departure Operations Metropolitan Airports Commission Runway 17 Departure Analysis Report - 1/1/2015- 1/31/2015. Report Generated: 0211112015 13:21 - 2 - ighttime Carrier Jet Departure Operations - 1/1/2015 - 1/31/2015 46 Nighttime Carrier Jet Departure Operations off of Runway 17 in 1/1/2015 - 1/31/2015 (10:30 p.m. - 6:00 a.m.) m 0 (0 %) Westbound Carrier Jet 12 (26.1%) Westbound Carrier Jet Departures turned west between 2.5 and 3.0 NM Departures turned west after 3.0 NM from start of from start of takeoff and remained over the takeoff and remained over the Minnesota River Minnesota River Valley (trending with Runway 17 Valley (trending with Runway 17 River Departure River Departure Heading) Procedure) ® 1 (2.2 %) Carrier Jet Departures turned 8 (17.4 %) Remaining westbound Carrier west before passing over the Runway 17 2.5 NM Jet Departures flew the Runway 17 Jet Departure turn point Procedure (passing over the 2.5 NM turn point), and with an enroute heading to the destination airport 25 (54.3 %) Other Nighttime Carrier Jet Departure Operations Metropolitan Airports Commission Runway 17 Departure Analysis Repot - 11112015- 113112015. Report Generated: 0211112015 13:21 - 3 - Remote Monitoring Tower (RMT) Site Locations K IM �X 0 Is7 fm. m WAIF! Note: The following pages contain noise data representative of real -time recordings from the Remote Monitoring Towers. Occasional data losses occur as a result of short -term equipment malfunctions and routine maintenance. Metropolitan Airports Commission Runway 17 Departure Analysis Report - 1/1/2015- 1/31/2015. Report Generated: 0211112015 13:21 - 4 - Analysis of Aircraft Noise Levels - DNL dBA 1/1/2015 - 1/31/2015 Date #30 #31 #32 #33 #34 #35 #36 #37 #38 #39 01/01 59.2 29.5 33.1 52.7 46 51.9 51.6 40.2 NA NA 01/02 63.4 46.8 36.2 51.7 48.3 48.1 48.5 46.4 51.4 55.6 01/03 56.8 43.1 41.1 42.9 37.1 48.5 51.4 41.5 47.4 50 01/04 43.7 NA NA NA NA 45.5 51.1 NA NA NA 01/05 62.3 44.6 35.4 42.2 38.5 57.5 49.5 42 48.7 42.9 01/06 53.1 NA NA NA NA 49.5 50.4 NA NA NA 01/07 43.9 NA NA 29 31.5 43.3 51 NA NA NA 01/08 54.6 39.4 NA 42.5 40 44.2 42.8 40.7 45,6 45.4 01/09 45.7 NA NA NA NA 44.2 47.3 NA NA NA 01/10 59 46.2 27 43.8 36.9 49 45.1 40.2 44.3 48.7 01/11 49.9 NA NA 36.2 NA 43,6 48.6 29 42.4 41.8 01/12 36,8 48.6 NA 38.4 26.7 46 49.3 41.7 42.7 31.4 01/13 56.9 43.3 NA 43.8 33.2 47.6 48.9 40.1 46.2 46 01/14 63.9 49.2 45.3 50.5 46.8 55,8 52 45.6 47.9 44 01715 62.5 44,8 32 NA 32,7 59.5 56.6 53.4 50 NA 01/16 64.8 52.6 45.5 52.3 49.6 49.2 35.3 46,8 51 50.3 01/17 56.7 39.8 31.6 47.2 44.2 53.9 52.8 43,9 37.1 NA 01/18 62.6 47.8 43.7 52.7 52.7 52.2 53.7 NA NA NA 01/19 61.3 47.5 41.3 48 34.3 45.8 NA 49.1 52.8 52 01/20 61.6 46.7 37.5 46.7 40,9 50.4 52.7 49.3 53.3 46.7 01/21 45.3 NA NA NA NA 47.7 50.7 NA NA NA 01/22 60.6 49.1 42.4 49.4 44.3 49.1 38.7 42.8 45.3 48.6 01/23 63.3 51.1 47.1 49 46.2 57.4 51.9 47.2 47.1 NA 01/24 65.2 49.4 45.1 50.6 46.9 58 57,1 46.7 39.8 NA 01/25 51.6 35.9 NA 34.9 29.8 45.1 49.5 39.3 45.3 40.2 01/26 57 42.7 37.3 43.2 41.2 54 54,2 41.9 42.2 NA 01/27 65.2 52.4 48 49.6 50.4 54 52 47.4 51.4 46.3 01/28 60.5 46 40.8 39.9 34.9 47.3 34.4 46.5 51 46.8 01/29 47,4 NA NA 29.8 NA 50.8 54.3 NA NA NA 01/30 60,5 46.3 39.6 47.3 39.4 52.2 53.1 46.5 51.2 52.1 01/31 65.8 47.8 26.5 47.5 46.1 60 56.2 53.1 43.6 NA M'o,DNL 60.7 46.4 40.3 4711 44.1 53,1 5117 ` 45.6 47,3 46.3' Metropolitan Airports Commission Runway 17 Departure Analysis Report - 11112015- 113112015. Report Generated: 0211112015 13:21 5 - Aircraft Noise Levels DNL dBA January 2012 to 2015 RMT Aircraft DNL Aircraft DNL Aircraft 'DNL Aircraft DNL ORD 2012 2013 2014 2015 30 57.8 56.7 54.9 607 31 44 40.9 407 46.4 32 38.8 36 35.6 40.3 33 42.7 41.8 38.2 47.1 34 39.9 37.5 34.4 44.1 35 53.1 52.4 47.6 53.1 36 52.8 50.2 49.7 51.7 37 44.8 43.1 37.1 45.6 38 45.9 45.1 40.2 47.3 39 46.4 46.8 44.2 463 Note: Due to adjustments in data processing, historical values may vary slightly from previous reports. Top 15 Runway 17 Departure Destination Report Airport City Heading (deg.) #Ops Percent of Total Ops ORD CHICAGO (O'HARE) 1240 303 7.4% DEN DENVER 2370 192 4.7% MDW CHICAGO (MIDWAY) 1240 186 4.5% ATL ATLANTA 1490 173 4.2% DFW DALLAS /FORT WORTH 1930 171 4.2% PHX PHOENIX 2310 169 4.1% IAH HOUSTON 1850 123 3% EWR NEWARK 1060 111 2.7% CLT CHARLOTTE 1330 105 2.6% MCI KANSAS CITY 1880 104 2.5% LAS LAS VEGAS 2430 100 2.4% STL ST LOUIS 1600 96 2.3% MCO ORLANDO 1510 88 2.1% RSW FORT MYERS 1540 82 2% LAX LOS ANGELES 2380 77 1.9% Metropolitan Airports Commission Runway 17 Departure Analysis Report - 1/1/2015- 1/31/2015. Report Generated: 0211112015 13:21 - 6 - Minneapolis -St. Paul International Airport (MSP) Annual Noise Contour Analysis Comparison of the 2014 Actual Noise Contour and the 2007 Forecast Noise Contour [This page is left blank intentionally] Listof Tables .................................................................................................. ............................... III Listof Figures .................................................................................................. .............................IV ExecutiveSummary ......................................................................................... .............................VI Chapter1: Background ................................................................................... ..............................1 1.1 Corrective Land Use Efforts at MSP to Address Airport Noise..,,.,,,,,,,, ............. 1.11 ....... 1 1.2 2007 Forecast Mitigated Noise Contour ........................................ ............................... 3 1.3 Airport Noise Litigation.................................................................... ..............................4 1 A Noise Mitigation Settlement and Annual Noise Contour Analysis .. ..............................6 1.5 Final MSP 2020 Improvements Environmental Assessment/Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EA/EAW) ................................................ ..............................7 Chapter 2: 2014 Actual Noise Contour ......................................................... .............................10 2.1 2014 Actual Noise Contour Development ...................................... .............................10 2.1 .1 Integrated Noise Model ........................................................ .............................10 2.1.2 2014 Aircraft Operations and Fleet Mix................................ .............................10 2.143 2014 Runway Use ................................................................ .............................15 2.1.4 2014 Flight Tracks,,, ........................................................ , ................................. 16 2.1.5 2014 Atmospheric Conditions .............................................. .............................16 2.22014 Modeled Versus Measured DNL Levels ............................... ......11.....................33 2.32014 Noise Contour Impacts ....................................................... ............................... 34 Chapter 3: Comparison of the 2014 Actual Noise Contour and the 2007 ForecastNoise Contour................................................................. .............................37 3.1 Comparison of 2014 Actual and 2007 Forecast Noise Contour Inputs ......................37 3.1.1 Integrated Noise Model Considerations ............................... a............................ 37 3.1.2 Aircraft Operations and Fleet Mix Comparison .................... .............................37 3.1.3 Runway Use Comparison ..................................................... .............................44 3.1.4 Flight Track Considerations .................................................. .............................45 3.1.5 Atmospheric Conditions Comparison ................................... .............................45 3.2 Comparative Integrated Noise Model Grid Point Analysis., ................ m .... m ............... sm. 45 3.3 Contour Comparison Summary ..................................................... .............................45 Chapter 4: 2014 Actual Noise Contour and the First Amendment to theConsent Decree ........................................................................ ................. ............63 4.1 First Amendment to the Noise Mitigation Consent Decree ............ .............................63 4.2 2014 Actual Contour Noise Mitigation Impact ................................ .............................63 Table 1.1: Summary of 2007 Forecast Mitigated DNL Noise Contour Single - Family and Multi - Family Unit Counts ........................................................................... ............................... 3 Table 2.1: 2014 Total Operations. . I I I I I . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0 0 8 0 0 0 P 4 . 0 . 0 . 0 . M . . a M . . . . . . . . 8 M . M M M . . . M . . . . . . M . . . . . . . . . . . a . . a , 0 * a . . . M . . 11 Table 2.2: 2014 Aircraft Fleet Mix Average Daily Operations .................................. .............................12 Table2.3: 2014 Runway Use... .................... I's ................................. @ ..... m ................... m ........ m .................. 16 Table 2.4: 2014 Measured vs. Modeled INM DNL Values at RMT Locations ........ .............................33 Table 2.5: Summary of 2014 Actual DNL Noise Contour Single - Family and Multi- Family UnitCounts............ .............. ...... 4 ................................................................................. 34 Table 3.1: Comparison of 2007 Forecast Mitigated and 2014 Actual Total Operations ...................... 37 Table 3.2: Comparison of 2007 Forecast Mitigated Fleet Mix and 2014 Actual Fleet Mix .................. 38 Table 3.3: Comparison of 2007 Forecast Mitigated and 2014 Actual Runway Use ............................ 44 Table 4.1: Summary of 2014 Actual DNL Noise Contour Single - Family Unit Counts by Block with First Year Mitigation Eligibility Status .............................................. ............................... 64 Table 4.2: Summary of 2014 Actual DNL Noise Contour Single - Family Unit Counts by Block with Second Consecutive Year Mitigation Eligibility Status .................. ............................... 65 Table 4.3: Summary of 2014 Actual DNL Noise Contour Multi - Family Unit Counts by Block with First Year Mitigation Eligibility Status .............................................. ............................... 65 Table 4.4: Summary of 2014 Actual DNL Noise Contour Multi - Family Unit Counts by Block with Second Consecutive Year Mitigation Eligibility Status .................. ............................... 66 Figure ES -1: 2014 Actual Contours with First Amendment Mitigation .................... 111....................1....... IX Figure ES -2: 2014 Actual Contours with Consecutive Years of Mitigation Eligibility Cityof Minneapolis... I I I I I . I . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 . . 0 0 . . . . . . . . W . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . a . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . x Figure 1.1: 2007 Forecast Mitigated Contours, ............................. a S 0 . 0 .................. q ...... ............... 5 Figure 2.1: 2014 INM Tracks — Runway 30L Departures Overall Use Percentage .............................17 Figure 2.2: 2014 INM Tracks — Runway 30R Departures Overall Use Percentage ............................18 Figure 2.3: 2014 INM Tracks — Runway 4 Departures Overall Use Percentage .... .............................19 Figure 2.4: 2014 INM Tracks — Runway 12L Departures Overall Use Percentage .............................20 Figure 2.5: 2014 INM Tracks — Runway 12R Departures Overall Use Percentage ............................21 Figure 2.6: 2014 INM Tracks — Runway 22 Departures Overall Use Percentage .. .............................22 Figure 2.7: 2014 INM Tracks— Runway 17 Departures Overall Use Percentage .. .............................23 Figure 2.8: 2014 INM Tracks — Runway 35 Departures Overall Use Percentage ............................... 24 Figure 2.9: 2014 INM Tracks — Runway 12R Arrivals Overall Use Percentage .... ............................... 25 Figure 2.10: 2014 INM Tracks — Runway 12L Arrivals Overall Use Percentage .. ............................... 26 Figure 2.11: 2014 INM Tracks — Runway 22 Arrivals Overall Use Percentage .... ............................... 27 Figure 2.12: 2014 INM Tracks — Runway 30R Arrivals Overall Use Percentage ... .......................0.....28 Figure 2.13: 2014 INM Tracks — Runway 30L Arrivals Overall Use Percentage .. ............................... 29 Figure 2.14: 2014 INM Tracks — Runway 35 Arrivals Overall Use Percentage .... ............................... 30 Figure 2.15: 2014 INM Tracks — Runway 4 Arrivals Overall Use Percentage ...... ............................... 31 Figure 2.16: 2014 INM Tracks — Runway 17 Arrivals Overall Use Percentage .... ............................... 32 Figure 2.17: 2014 Actual Contours .......................................................................... ............................... 35 Figure 2.18: 2007, 20082 2009, 20103 2011, 2012, 2013, and 2014 Actual Contours .........................36 Figure 3.1: Decibel Levels from 2014 Actual Grid Point DNLs .............................. ............................... 47 Figure 3.2: Decibel Levels from 2014 Actual Grid Point DNLs Cityof Minneapolis .................................................................................... .............................48 IV Figure 3.3: Decibel Levels from 2014 Actual. Grid Point DNLs Cityof Richfield ....................................................................................... ............................... 49 Figure 3.4: Decibel Levels from 2014 Actual Grid Point DNLs Cities of Bloomington and Eagan.... I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 0 0 W 0 1 1 1 ................... 4 .... 0 0 .... 0 .............. 50 Figure 3.5: Decibel Levels from 2014 Actual Grid Point DNLs Cities of Eagan, Mendota Heights and Inver Grove Heights ................ ............................... 51 Figure 3.6: Decibel Levels from 2007 Forecast Mitigated Grid Point DNLs ............ ............................152 Figure 37: Decibel Levels from 2007 Forecast Mitigated Grid Point DNLs Cityof Minneapolis. .............................................................I .........................................1 53 Figure 3.8: Decibel Levels from 2007 Forecast Mitigated Grid Point DNLs Cityof Richfield ....................................................................................... ............................... 54 Figure 3.9: Decibel Levels from 2007 Forecast Mitigated Grid Point DNLs Cities of Bloomington and Eagan............,.. ............................... so .........................................1 55 Figure 3.10: Decibel Levels from 2007 Forecast Mitigated Grid Point DNLs Cities of Eagan, Mendota Heights and Inver Grove Heights ................. ............................156 Figure 3.11: Difference in dB Level Between 2007 Forecast Mitigated and 2014 Actual Grid Point DNLs for Blocks Included in Noise Mitigation Settlement ............. 57 Figure 3.12: Difference in dB Level Between 2007 Forecast Mitigated and 2014 Actual Grid Point DNLs for Blocks Included in Noise Mitigation Settlement Cityof Minneapolis.. .................................1 4 ............................ 0.0 .......................... 58 Figure 3.13: Difference in dB Level Between 2007 Forecast Mitigated and 2014 Actual Grid Point DNLs for Blocks Included in Noise Mitigation Settlement Cityof Richfield.... ........................... ............................. ................... ,,O.ot .............. 59 Figure 3.14: Difference in dB Level Between 2007 Forecast Mitigated and 2014 Actual Grid Point DNLs for Blocks Included in Noise Mitigation Settlement Cities of Bloomington and Eagan ............................................................. .............................60 Figure 3.15: Difference in dB Level Between 2007 Forecast Mitigated and 2014 Actual Grid Point DNLs for Blocks Included in Noise Mitigation Settlement Cities of Eagan, Mendota Heights and Inver Grove Heights ................ ....seem....................... 61 Figure 3.16: 2014 Actual Contours and 2007 Forecast Mitigated Contours ........... ............................162 Figure 4.1: 2014 Actual Contours with First Amendment Mitigation ....................... ............................167 Figure 4.2: 2014 Actual Contours with Consecutive Years of Mitigation Eligibility Cityof Minneapolis ..................................................... ............................... ............................168 v Background The issue of noise at Minneapolis -St. Paul International Airport (MSP) includes a long history of local efforts to quantify and mitigate noise impacts in a manner responsive to concerns raised by the communities around the airport and consistent with federal policy. In 1992, the Metropolitan Airports Commission (MAC) embarked on a 14 CFR Part 150 Program at MSP, which included a noise mitigation program for single - family and multi - family residences and schools, as well as property acquisition and relocation based on mitigation eligibility defined by the 1996 forecast 65 Day -Night Average Sound Level (DNL) noise contour. When the original Part 150 Program was completed in 2006, noise mitigation had been provided to over 7,800 single - family homes, 1,327 multi - family units, 18 schools and 437 residential properties were acquired around MSP at a cost of approximately $385.6 million. In 1999 the MAC began an update to the Part 150 Program at MSP. The resulting program used 2007 forecast operations to produce a 2007 forecast noise contour (a 2005 forecast noise contour was also developed as part of this process but was ultimately not used due to the length of the planning process and associated changes in forecasting variables). One of the largest discussion items in the Part 150 Update process focused on the mitigation program the MAC would offer in the 2007 64 to 60 DNL noise contour area. Expansion of noise mitigation efforts beyond the federally- recognized level of 65 DNL was outlined as part of the Dual -Track Airport Planning Process (a process begun in 1989 and concluded in 1998 that examined moving MSP versus expanding it in its current location, undertaken at the direction of the Minnesota State Legislature). Through the Part 150 Update, the MAC detailed a specific mitigation package to be offered in the 64 to 60 DNL noise contour area, proposing central air - conditioning to single - family homes that did not have it, with a homeowner co -pay based on the degree of noise impact. Airport Noise Litigation and the Consent Decree The cities located around MSP expressed dissatisfaction with the Part 150 Update 64 to 60 DNL noise mitigation proposal in the context of the Dual -Track Airport Planning Process discussions. In early 2005, the Cities of Minneapolis, Eagan, and Richfield and the Minneapolis Public Housing Authority filed suit in Hennepin County District Court against the MAC on the grounds that the MAC violated environmental quality standards and the Minnesota Environmental Rights Act by failing to provide a 5- decibel noise reduction package (as was provided in the 1996 65 DNL noise contour) to single - family homes in the 64 to 60 DNL contours. In September 2005, plaintiffs seeking class action certification filed a separate action against the MAC alleging breach of contract claims associated with mitigation in the 64 to 60 DNL contours. In 2007, the MAC and the Cities of Minneapolis, Eagan, and Richfield and the Minneapolis Public Housing Authority entered into a Consent Decree that settled the cities and class action litigation. The 2007 Consent Decree provided the 5- decibel noise mitigation package to single - family homes in the 2007 forecast 63+ DNL noise contours and lesser noise mitigation package options to single family -homes located in the 2007 forecast 63 to 60 DNL noise contours, with a noise mitigation reimbursement option for single - family homes located between the forecast 2007 and 2005 60 DNL noise contours. Multi- family structures were offered a uniform package in the 2007 forecast 60+ DNL noise contours. All phases of the 2007 Consent Decree noise mitigation program have been completed at a cost of approximately $95 million. Completion of the 2007 Consent Decree increased the total number of single - family homes that have received noise mitigation around MSP to over 15,000, and multi - family units to 3,303. The total cost of the MAC's noise mitigation programs to date is over $480 million. vi MSP 2020 Improvements EA/EAW In January 2013, the MAC published the Final MSP 2020 Improvements Environmental Assessment/Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EA/EAW), which reviewed the potential and cumulative environmental impacts of MSP terminal and landside developments needed through the year 2020. A new noise mitigation plan was proposed in the EA/EAW leading to an amendment to the 2007 Consent Decree. First Amendment to the 2007 Consent Decree The First Amendment to the 2007 Consent Decree establishes noise mitigation eligibility based on actual noise contours that the MAC prepares for MSP on an annual basis. For a home to be considered eligible for mitigation it must be located in the actual 60+ DNL noise contour, within a higher noise impact mitigation eligibility area when compared to its status relative to the 2007 Consent Decree noise mitigation program, for a total of three consecutive years, with the first of the three years beginning no later than 2020. The noise contour boundary is based on the block intersect methodology. Homes will be mitigated in the year following their eligibility determination. The First Amendment mitigation program eligibility assessment began with the 2013 actual noise contour. In 2014, an additional chapter was added to the 2013 Annual Noise Contour Analysis to assess the mitigation area and eligibility per the amended 2007 Consent Decree. This report marks the second consecutive year of noise mitigation eligibility analysis under the terms of the First Amendment to the 2007 Consent Decree in the context of the 2014 actual noise contour. Noise Mitigation Eligibility Status under the First Amendment to the 2007 Consent Decree Based on the 411,760 total operations at MSP in 2014, the actual 60 DNL contour is approximately 44.2 percent smaller than the 2007 forecast contour and the 65 DNL contour is approximately 51.9 percent smaller than the 2007 forecast contour. The predominant contraction in the contours from the 2007 forecast to the 2014 actual noise contour scenario is driven largely by fleet mix changes, including a 99.9 percent reduction in Modified — "Hushkit" — Stage 3 aircraft operations and a 29.3 percent reduction in total aircraft operations. However, there is a small area in South Minneapolis where the 2014 actual noise contours extend beyond the 2007 forecast noise contours establishing first, and in some cases second consecutive, year impacts in certain residential areas above their noise mitigation eligibility impact levels under the terms of the 2007 Consent Decree. This small expansion of noise impacts can largely be attributed to nighttime runway use variances between what was forecasted for 2007 and what actually occurred in 2014, particularly an increase of the nighttime arrival operations on Runway 12R. This same trend existed in 2013, although to a lesser degree. In this second year of actual noise contour mapping, as established by the terms of the First Amendment to the 2007 Consent Decree, there are a total of 285 single - family homes that meet the first -year eligibility criteria of the three consecutive year higher noise impact mitigation eligibility requirement. Of the 285 single - family homes, 39 were previously eligible for the homeowner reimbursement noise mitigation program (located between the 2007 and 2005 forecast 60 DNL contours) and another 126 homes were outside the program, under the terms of the 2007 Consent Decree. These homes are now within the 2014 actual 60 -62 DNL noise contour. If these homes remain within the actual 60 -62 DNL noise contour for three consecutive years, they will be eligible for one of two mitigation options, as detailed in Section 9.5(b) of the First Amendment to the 2007 Consent Decree. Additionally, there are 120 single- family homes previously in the 60 -62 DNL contour under the terms of the 2007 Consent Decree that meet the first year eligibility criteria of the three consecutive year higher noise impact mitigation eligibility requirement within the 63 DNL contour. If these homes remain within the actual 63+ DNL noise contour for three consecutive years, they will be eligible for mitigation upgrades necessary to achieve the 5- decibel noise reduction package. All single- family and multi - family units that met the first year of the three consecutive year higher noise impact mitigation eligibility requirement by virtue of the 2013 actual noise contour achieve a second year of consecutive increased noise impact with the 2014 actual noise contour. There are a total of 137 single- family homes and 89 multi - family units that meet the second consecutive year of higher noise impact. Of the 137 single- family homes, 119 homes were previously eligible for the homeowner reimbursement noise mitigation program (located between the 2007 and 2005 forecast 60 DNL contours) and another 18 homes were previously outside the program and are now within the 2014 60 -62 DNL noise contour. If these single - family homes remain within the 60 -62 DNL vu actual noise contour for another year, they will be eligible for one of two mitigation options, as detailed in Section 9.5(b) of the First Amendment to the 2007 Consent Decree. Additionally, there are 89 multi - family units which were not included in the 2007 Consent Decree noise mitigation program that are located within the 2014 actual 60 -64 DNL contours establishing their second consecutive year at a higher noise impact mitigation eligibility level. If these multi - family units remain within the actual 60 -64 DNL noise contour for one more year, they will be eligible for the Multi - Family Home Mitigation Package as defined in Section 9.6 of the First Amendment to the Consent Decree. The blocks meeting the first and second consecutive year(s) of the three consecutive year higher noise impact mitigation eligibility requirement for increased noise mitigation from the MAC are shown in Figures ES -1 and ES- 21 vni IEI 2 The issue of noise at Minneapolis -St. Paul International Airport (MSP) includes a long history of local efforts to quantify and mitigate noise impacts in a manner responsive to concerns raised by the communities around the airport and consistent with federal policy. These efforts have resulted in the conceptualization and implementation of many initiatives to reduce noise impacts around MSP. One of the most notable of these initiatives has been the sound insulation program originally implemented under 14 Code of Federal Regulations (C.F.R.) Part 150. Part 150 provides a framework for airport operators to develop a comprehensive noise plan for an airport in the form of a Noise Compatibility Program (NCP). A Part 150 NCP is comprised of two fundamental approaches to addressing noise impacts around an airport: (1) Land Use Measures, and (2) Noise Abatement Measures (operational measures to reduce noise). A key component of Part 150 program planning is the development of a base case Noise Exposure Map (NEM) and a five -year forecast NEM without (unmitigated forecast scenario) and with (forecast mitigated scenario) the recommended operational noise abatement measures. Including operational noise abatement measures is important because how an airport is operated and how aircraft procedures are executed have a direct effect on an airport's noise impact. NEMs are commonly referred to as noise contours. Forecast mitigated noise contours depict the areas that may be eligible for Land Use Measures (compatible land use plans, property acquisition, residential relocation, and sound mitigation) around an airport. Recognizing the need for increased infrastructure and the emerging importance of noise issues as operations at MSP increased, the Metropolitan Airports Commission (MAC) submitted its first MSP Part 150 Study to the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) in October 1987. NEMs were accepted by the FAA in October 1989, and portions of the NCP were approved in April 1990. The NCP included Corrective Land Use Measures which called for the soundproofing of residences, schools and other public buildings. A 1992 update to the NCP and NEM marked the beginning of corrective mitigation measures in the forecast 1996 NEM 65 and greater Day -Night Average Sound Level (DNL) noise contours. From 1992 to 2006, the residential noise mitigation program was a large and visible part of the Part 150 program at MSP. The MAC designed the MSP residential noise mitigation program using FAA structural Noise Level Reduction (NLR) documentation to establish product- specific Sound Transmission Class (STC) ratings and associated NLR goals, creative bidding practices, and cooperative prioritization and funding efforts. Through innovative approaches to enhancing the program as new information and technologies became available, the MSP residential noise mitigation program quickly became a national model. Because testing and evaluation of single - family homes near MSP indicated that the majority of such homes provided an average 30 decibels (dB) of exterior to interior sound attenuation, the MAC developed a "5 dB package for single - family homes within the 65 DNL and greater noise contours. This package provided an average exterior -to- interior noise reduction level of 5 dB, ensuring a noticeable level of reduction designed to meet the FAA's target of a 45 DNL interior noise level in each home.' The 5 dB package offered a menu of mitigation measures that the MAC might install to achieve an average 5 dB noise reduction and meet the 45 DNL interior noise level in an individual home. The menu of mitigation measures included: windows; prime doors; attic insulation; baffling of attic vents, mail slots and chimneys; and the addition of central air - conditioning. The MAC FAA, "Guidelines for the Sound Insulation of Residences Exposed to Aircraft Operations," October 1992, pg. 3 -18. 1 determined which specific mitigation measures were necessary for a particular home after assessing the home's existing condition. As a result of detailed and extensive project management and quality control, the program achieved an excellent record of homeowner satisfaction. Throughout the duration of the program, when homeowners were asked if the improvements were effective at reducing aircraft noise, at least 95 percent responded yes. When asked if the modifications improved interior home comfort, at least 95 percent responded yes. In 2004, the MAC awarded the final bids for the remaining unmitigated homes in the 1996 65 DNL noise contour. In early 2006, the MAC completed the mitigation of an additional 165 single - family homes in the 2007 forecast mitigated 65 DNL noise contour. With the completion of the 165 single - family homes, all eligible and participating homes within the 2007 forecast mitigated 65 DNL contour have been mitigated. This represented a significant accomplishment for an industry- leading airport noise mitigation program. The program resulted in the mitigation of over 7,800 single - family homes in communities around MSP. The financial investment in the MSP Residential Sound Insulation Program was among the largest in the nation for such programs. Throughout the 14 -year project (1992 -2006) several variables had an impact on the project's annual financial profile. Year -to -year variations in housing stock and material costs caused fluctuations in the unit, or per- house, costs. This, combined with variations in annual budgets as a result of challenges such as the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, resulted in a fluctuating rate of annual home completions. Annual average mitigation costs per single - family home ranged from a low of $17,300 in 1994 to a high of $45,000 in 2001. The MAC spent a total of approximately $229.5 million on the single - family home mitigation program during its 14 -year lifespan. In addition to the single- family mitigation program, the MAC also mitigated multi- family units and schools, and engaged in property acquisition and relocation. The multi - family component of the residential noise mitigation program began in 2001, and was significantly smaller in both the number of structures mitigated and the associated costs. With completion of multi - family structures in the 1996 65 DNL noise contour, the MAC mitigated approximately 1,327 multi - family units at a total cost of approximately $11.1 million. There were no additional multi- family structures inside the 2007 forecast mitigated 65 DNL noise contour. All eligible and participating multi- family structures within the 2007 forecast mitigated 65 DNL noise contour have been mitigated. Also, since 1981, the MAC has mitigated 18 schools located around MSP. This total represents all of the schools located within the 1996 65 DNL noise contour. In response to Minnesota State Legislature's directives, the MAC also provided mitigation to certain schools located outside the 1996 65 DNL noise contour. The costs of insulating individual schools varied from $850,000 to $8 million. A total of approximately $52 million was spent on the school sound insulation program. In addition to the residential and school noise mitigation programs, the MAC implemented a residential property acquisition program that facilitated the relocation of sensitive land uses, such as residential buildings, in noise impact areas. The intent of the residential acquisition program was to address impacted properties in the 1996 65 DNL noise contour, with the property owners and the city in which the respective property resided agreeing that acquisition was the desirable means of mitigating the homes. As a result, the MAC acquired approximately 437 residential properties. In total, the MAC expended approximately $93.0 million on the residential property acquisition program. 2 In late 1998, the MAC authorized an update to the Part 150 program at MSP. The update process began in 1999 with the development of noise contours and noise abatement and land use measures. The MAC published a draft Part 150 Update document in October 2000 and submitted the study, including a 2005 forecast NEM and revised NCP, to the FAA for review. In May 2002, after further consideration of the events of September 11, 2001, the MAC withdrew the study to update the forecast and associated noise contours. The forecast update process began in February 2003. This effort focused on updating the base case year from a 2000 scenario to a 2002 base case, and updating the forecast year from 2005 to 2007. The purpose of the forecast update was to ensure that the noise contours considered the impacts of the events of September 11, 2001 and ongoing changes in the MSP aircraft fleet. In addition to updating the forecast, the MAC and the MSP Noise Oversight Committee (NOC) conducted a review of the Integrated Noise Model (INM) input methodology and data to ensure continued consensus with the previous contour (i.e., November 2001) development process. On November 17, 2003, the MAC approved the revised forecast and fleet mix numbers and INM input methodology and data for use in developing the 2002 and 2007 NEMs. In March 2004, the MAC revised the forecast to incorporate certain corrections in general aviation numbers and to reflect Northwest Airlines' announcement that it would resume service of five RJ85 aircraft that had been taken out of service previously. The 2004 Part 150 Update resulted in a comprehensive Noise Compatibility Program (NCP) recommendation. In addition to several land use measures around MSP, the NCP included provisions for a number of operational Noise Abatement (NA) Measures. The aircraft and airport operational noise abatement initiatives in the 2004 Part 150 Update focused on aircraft operation procedures, runway use, departure and arrival flight tracks, voluntary operational agreements with the airlines, and provisions for further evaluation of technology. The MAC has implemented the operational NA Measures outlined in the November 2004 Part 150 Update NCP that are reflected in the 2007 forecast mitigated noise contour included in the 2004 MSP Part 150 Update. Based on the estimate of 582,366 total operations in the 2007 forecast mitigated scenario, approximately 7,234.4 acres are in the 65 DNL noise contour and approximately 15,708.3 acres are in the 60 DNL noise contour. Table 1.1 contains the count of single - family (one to three units per structure) and multi- family (more than three units per structure) dwelling units within the 2007 forecast mitigated noise contours. The counts are based on the block intersect methodology, where all structures on a block that is within or touched by the noise contour are counted. The count of completed units reflects all units that have received mitigation prior to February 2015. Table 1.1 MINNEAPOLIS- ST.PAUL INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT Summary of 2007 Forecast Mitigated DNL Noise Contour Single - Family and Multi- Family Unit Counts *Units (Block Intersect Implementation Method, Completed Reflect All Units Completed Prior to February 2015) City Count Dwelling Units Within DNL (dB) Interval Single - Family Multi - Family 60.64 65 -69 70 -74 75+ 1 Total 60 -64 65 -69 70 -74 75+ Total Minneapolis Completed 7260 3078 504 10842 851 27 466 - 1344 Bloomington Completed 131 109 40 280 256 447 618 1321 Richfield Completed 1053 296 1349 359 14 373 Eagan Completed 561 22 583 - - Mendota Heights Completed 93 4 97 All Cities Completed 9098 1 3509 544 13151 1466 488 1084 - 3038 *Units that declined mitigation or were determined to be ineligible for participation in the current program are not included in the table. MAC analysis, 2015 3 All eligible and participating homes within the 2007 forecast mitigated 60 DNL noise contour have been mitigated. As a result of updated parcel information the MAC obtained from Metro GIS in January 2015, the unit counts in Table 1.1 differ from previous figures published for the 2007 forecast mitigated noise contours in the November 2004 Part 150 Update document. In 2012, the home mitigation phases within the 2007 60 DNL contour were completed. Approximately 1,222 units (310 single - family and 912 multi - family units) did not receive mitigation because either the homeowner declined or they were determined to be ineligible. A depiction of the 2007 forecast mitigated noise contours are provided in Figure 1.1. One of the largest discussion items in the Part 150 Update process that began in 1999 focused on the mitigation program that the MAC would offer in the 64 to 60 DNL noise contour area. The FAA recognizes sensitive land uses, such as residential land uses eligible for noise mitigation under Part 150, only within the 65 and greater DNL noise contours. However, as part of the Dual -Track Airport Planning Process (a process that examined moving MSP versus expanding it in its current location, undertaken at the direction of the Minnesota State Legislature), the MAC made a policy decision to provide some level of noise mitigation out to the 60 DNL noise contour at MSP. During the Dual -Track Airport Planning Process, an MSP Noise Mitigation Committee was developed and tasked with proposing a noise mitigation plan to be considered in conjunction with the expansion of MSP at its present location. Throughout the Part 150 Update process, the intent of the MSP Noise Mitigation Committee's recommendation regarding mitigation outside the 65 DNL contour was a topic of detailed discussion and debate. During the course of the Part 150 Update process the MAC formulated a number of mitigation proposals, culminating in a final MAC position on mitigation outside the 65 DNL contour. In the November 2004 Part 150 Update, the MAC's recommendation for mitigation in the 64 to 60 DNL contours called for providing central air - conditioning to single - family homes that did not have it, with a homeowner co -pay based on the degree of noise impact. The MAC based eligibility for the mitigation proposal on the 2007 forecast mitigated noise contour using the block intersect methodology. The cities located around MSP expressed dissatisfaction with the MAC proposal, asserting that the MSP Noise Mitigation Committee recommended that the 5 dB package was to be expanded to all properties in the 64 to 60 DNL noise contours. The MAC countered that the MSP Noise Mitigation Committee's recommendations did not specify the mitigation package elements to be offered in the 64 to 60 DNL noise contour area and that, because homes in Minnesota have higher than the national average pre- existing noise attenuation characteristics, the full 5 dB package was not necessary outside the 65 DNL contour. In early 2005, the Cities of Minneapolis, Eagan, and Richfield filed suit in Hennepin County District Court claiming, among other things, the MAC violated environmental quality standards and the Minnesota Environmental Rights Act (MERA) by failing to provide a 5 dB package to single - family homes in the 64 to 60 DNL contours. In September 2005, plaintiffs seeking class action certification filed a separate action against the MAC alleging breach of contract claims associated with mitigation in the 64 to 60 DNL contours. In January 2007, Hennepin County District Judge Stephen Aldrich granted the cities partial summary judgment. The court found, among other things, that the MAC, by virtue of implementing the 5 dB package, created an environmental standard that the MAC violated by recommending different mitigation in the 64 to 60 DNL noise contour area. In February 2007, the court held a trial on the cities' MERA and mandamus claims. Before the court entered final judgment post - trial, however, the parties negotiated a global settlement resolving the cities' case and the class action suit. 11 J On October 19, 2007, Judge Stephen Aldrich approved a Consent Decree entered into by the MAC and the Cities of Minneapolis, Eagan, and Richfield and the Minneapolis Public Housing Authority that settled the cities' litigation. The Consent Decree provided that it became effective only if: (1) the FAA advised the MAC in writing by November 15, 2007 that the Decree was an appropriate use of airport revenue and was consistent with the MAC's federal grant obligations; and (2) that the court approved a settlement in the class action case by January 17, 2008. Both of these conditions were satisfied, and in 2008 the MAC began implementing single - family and multi- family mitigation out to the 2007 60 DNL noise contours and mitigation reimbursement funds out to the 2005 60 DNL noise contours, as the Consent Decree required. Under the Decree, mitigation activities would vary based on noise contour. Homes in the most noise - impacted contours were eligible for more extensive mitigation than those in less- impacted areas. The 2007 Consent Decree provided that approximately 457 homes in the 2007 64 to 63 DNL forecast noise contours were eligible to receive the same level of noise mitigation that the MAC provided in the 1996 65 DNL and greater contours. The 200764 to 63 DNL noise contour mitigation program was designed to achieve 5 dB of noise reduction on average, with mitigation measures that might include the following, depending upon the home's existing condition: central air - conditioning; exterior and storm window repair or replacement; prime door and storm door repair or replacement; wall and attic insulation; baffling of roof vents and chimney treatment. The Decree required that the MAC complete construction of mitigation in the 2007 64 and 63 DNL noise contours by December 31, 2009. The MAC has completed that task. In addition, under the Decree, owners of the approximately 5,428 single - family homes in the 2007 62 to 60 DNL noise contours were eligible for one of two mitigation packages: 1) homes that did not have central air - conditioning as of September 1, 2007 would receive it and up to $4,000 (including installation costs) in other noise mitigation products and services they could choose from a menu provided by the MAC; or 2) owners of homes that already had central air - conditioning installed as of September 1., 2007 or who chose not to receive central air- conditioning were eligible for up to $14,000 (including installation costs) in noise mitigation products and services they could choose from a menu provided by the MAC. The mitigation menu included acoustical modifications such as: exterior and storm window repair or replacement; prime door and storm door repair or replacement; wall and attic insulation; and baffling of roof vents and chimney treatment. The Decree required that the MAC complete construction of mitigation in the 2007 62 to 60 DNL contours by December 1, 2012. The MAC has completed that task. According to the provisions in the Consent Decree, single - family homes in the 2007 64 and 63 DNL contours and in the 2007 62 to 60 DNL contours whose earlier owners opted out of the previously- completed MAC noise mitigation program for the 1996 65 and greater DNL contours, but that had new owners on September 1, 2007, were eligible to "opt in" and receive noise mitigation. If the total cost to the MAC of the opt -in mitigation is less than $7 million, any remaining funds were used to reimburse owners of single - family homes between the 2005 mitigated 60 DNL contour and the 2007 forecast mitigated 60 DNL contour for purchase and installation of products included on a menu provided by the MAC. The amount each homeowner received was determined by subtracting dollars spent for the opt -in program from the total $7 million budget, and then by dividing the remainder of funds among the total number of single- family homes within the 2005 60 DNL and 2007 60 DNL contours. The MAC issued reimbursements and completed reimbursement claim payments in September 2014. The total cost of the "opt -in" mitigation and the 2005 mitigated 60 DNL contour reimbursement mitigation program was capped at $7 million. By December 2012, the MAC completed the 5 dB reduction noise mitigation program for all of the single - family homes in the 2007 63 -64 DNL contours. (404 homes participated in the program.) In addition, the MAC completed [. all of the single - family homes in the 2007 60 -62 DNL contours in December 2012. (5,055 homes participated in the program.) A total of 1,773 single - family homes between the 2005 mitigated 60 DNL contour and the 2007 forecast mitigated 60 DNL contour were provided reimbursements for approved noise mitigation enhancements and the program was completed. With regard to the multi - family noise mitigation program, the MAC installed acoustical covers on the air - conditioners or completed the installation of new air - conditioning units in 1,976 living units marking completion of that program in 2010. The total cost to implement mitigation under the original Consent Decree was approximately $95 million, (which is inclusive of the $7 million for opt -in mitigation and single - family mitigation reimbursement). With the final MAC payments in September 2014 for noise mitigation reimbursements, all of the phases of the noise mitigation program required under the original Consent Decree have been completed. In addition to the MAC's mitigation obligations, the Consent Decree releases legal claims that the cities and homeowners have against the MAC in exchange for the actions that the MAC would perform under the Decree. (Consent Decree Section 8.1, p. 38). The releases cease to be effective for a certain location if the average annual aircraft noise level in DNL at that location is at or above DNL 60 and is at least 2 dB in DNL higher than the DNL level for that location in the 2007 mitigated noise contours. The MAC determines future DNL values by using the FAA's Integrated Noise Model and actual MSP operations data to generate a noise contour reflecting noise conditions at MSP for the prior calendar year. (Consent Decree Section 8.1(d), pp. 38 -39.) The MAC must develop a noise contour reflecting noise conditions for the prior calendar year by March 1 of each year. The MAC has prepared this report to satisfy Section 8.1(d) of the Consent Decree. MAC staff and representatives from the Cities of Minneapolis, Eagan, and Richfield met on February 11 and 20, 2008 to discuss and finalize the annual report format. The actual contour that the MAC must develop under Section 8.1(d) of the Consent Decree is relevant to the release provisions in Section 8.1 as well as the determination of mitigation eligibility as defined by an amendment to the Consent Decree, described in Chapter 4 of this report. In January 2013, the MAC published the Final MSP 2020 Improvements Environmental Assessment/Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EA/EAW), which reviewed the potential and cumulative environmental impacts of MSP terminal and landside developments needed through the year 2020. Of the several development alternatives examined, Alternative 2 — Airlines Relocate was determined to be the Preferred Alternative. This alternative outlined improvements needed to 2020, presuming that the non - SkyTeam airlines currently located in Terminal 1- Lindbergh are relocated to Terminal 2- Humphrey. SkyTeam is an alliance of 20 member airlines, including Delta Air Lines. This development was supported in recognition of the fact that MSP's two - terminal system could be utilized more efficiently by relocating all airlines other than the SkyTeam airlines to Terminal 2- Humphrey and developing terminal and land side infrastructure accordingly to accommodate future forecasted demand. This would relieve capacity constraints at Terminal 1- Lindbergh while better balancing the mix of passengers and landside capacity at the two terminals. As is detailed in the EA/EAW, the Federal Aviation Administration's (FAA) Finding of No Significant Impact/Record of Decision (FONSI /ROD) and summarized in the MAC's related Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Order, the Preferred Alternative scenario does not have the potential for significant environmental effects. The forecasted noise contours around MSP are driven by natural traffic growth that is anticipated to occur with or without implementation of the 2020 Improvements. However, given past noise mitigation activities surrounding MSP, the terms of the 2007 Consent Decree in City of Minneapolis, et. al. v. Metropolitan Airports Commission, and local land use compatibility guidelines defined by the Metropolitan Council, many of the public comments on the EA/EAW focused on future noise mitigation efforts. Additionally, the anticipated completion of the Consent Decree noise mitigation program in 2014, and the possible implementation of Performance -Based Navigation (PBN) procedures by the FAA at MSP contemplated at the time of the EA/EAW comment period, raised community interest regarding future of noise mitigation at MSP. In response, MAC staff, in consultation with the MSP Noise Oversight Committee (NOC), began the process of developing a noise mitigation plan to be included in the EA/EAW. The resulting recommended noise mitigation program established that noise mitigation program eligibility be based upon actual noise contours that the MAC would prepare for MSP on an annual basis. To be eligible for noise mitigation, a home would need to be located for three consecutive years in a higher noise mitigation impact area when compared to the home's status under the terms of the 2007 Consent Decree. The Final MSP 2020 Improvements EA/EAW detailed the following mitigation program elements: • Mitigation eligibility would be assessed annually based on the actual noise contours for the previous year. • The annual mitigation assessment would begin with the actual noise contour for the year in which the FAA FONSI /ROD for the EA/EAW was issued. • For a home to be considered eligible for mitigation it must be located in the actual 60+ DNL noise contour, within a higher noise impact mitigation area when compared to its status relative to the original Consent Decree noise mitigation program, for a total of three consecutive years, with the first of the three years beginning no later than 2020. • The noise contour boundary would be based on the block intersect methodology. • Homes would be mitigated in the year following their eligibility determination. On January 7, 2013, the FAA published the Final MSP 2020 Improvements EA/EAW and the Draft Finding of No Significant Impact/Record of Decision (FONSI/ROD), which included the following position regarding the proposed noise mitigation program: "The FAA is reviewing MAC's proposal for noise mitigation of homes for consistency with the 1999 FAA Policy and Procedures concerning the use of airport revenue and other applicable policy guidance. " During the public comment period on the FAA's Draft FONSI/ROD many communities submitted comments urging the FAA to approve the MAC's revised noise mitigation proposal. On March 5, 2013, the FAA approved the FONSI/ROD for the Final MSP 2020 Improvements EA/EAW. Specifically, on page 15 of the approved FONSI/ROD, the FAA stated that noise mitigation would not be a condition of FAA approval of the MSP 2020 Improvements project because "[n]o areas of sensitive land uses would experience a 1.5 dB or greater increase in the 65 DNL noise contour when comparing the No Action Alternative for 2020 and 2025 with the Proposed Action [Preferred Alternative — Airlines Relocate scenario] for the respective years." However, the FAA included a letter dated March 5, 2013, as Attachment D to the FONSI/ROD that addresses the conditions under which airport revenue may be used for off - airport noise mitigation. In that letter, the FAA stated: "As a matter of general principle mitigation measures imposed by a state court as part of a consent decree are eligible for use of airport revenue. Conceptually MAC could use airport revenues if it were to amend the 2007 consent decree to include the proposed mitigation." Based on the FAA guidance, the MAC initiated discussions with the other parties to the Consent Decree (Cities of Minneapolis, Richfield and Eagan and the Minneapolis Public Housing Authority) to begin the amendment process. Additionally, at the March 20, 2013, NOC meeting, the Committee was updated on the progress of this issue and voted unanimously, supporting the following position: WOC supports the noise mitigation program as detailed in the final EA/EAW in principal and supports follow -up negotiations between the parties to the Consent Decree to establish mutually agreeable terms 8 for the modification of the Consent Decree consistent with the March 611 FAA letter in Appendix D of the FONSI ROD, for consideration by the Court." This report was updated to provide maps analyzing changes that occur in noise mitigation eligibility as compared to the 2007 Consent Decree, and associated trends relative to consecutive yearly impacts. This information is detailed in Chapter 4. As discussed previously, Section 8.1(d) of the Consent Decree requires the MAC to prepare, by March 1 of each year, an actual noise contour reflecting the noise conditions around MSP for the prior calendar year. This chapter provides detailed information on the 2014 actual noise contour at MSP. 2.1.1 Integrated Noise Model The FAA- established mechanism for quantifying airport noise impacts is the Integrated Noise Model (INM). The availability of federal or airport- generated funds for the purpose of noise mitigation efforts is contingent upon the development of a Noise Exposure Map (DNL noise contours) in a manner that is consistent with the federal criteria (i.e., INM and DNL). The INM is used to assess the noise impact of aircraft operations. The INM uses input files consisting of information relative to runway use, flight track use, aircraft fleet mix, aircraft performance and thrust settings, topography information, and atmospheric conditions to generate a Noise Exposure Map. The DNL metric adds a 10- decibel penalty to aircraft operations that occur between the hours of 10 p.m. and 7 a.m. to account for relatively low nighttime ambient noise levels and the fact that most people are asleep during this time. The INM model generates contours that depict an annualized average day of aircraft noise impacts. The DNL contours generated are the focal point of any noise mitigation measures and residential parcel eligibility described in the terms of the First Amendment to the Consent Decree. Quantifying aircraft- specific noise characteristics in INM is accomplished through the use of a comprehensive noise database that has been developed under the auspices of Federal Aviation Regulation (FAR) Part 36. As part of the airworthiness certification process, aircraft manufacturers are required to subject aircraft to a battery of noise tests. Through the use of federally adopted and endorsed algorithms, this aircraft - specific noise information is used in the generation of INM DNL contours. Justification for such an approach is rooted in national standardization of noise quantification at airports. The FAA Office of Environment and Energy developed the INM. Since 1978, the INM has been the FAA's standard tool for determining the predicted noise impact in the vicinity of airports. The INM is designed to estimate long -term average effects using average annual input conditions. The current version of INM, 7.0d, was released in May 2013, and was used to develop the 2014 actual noise contour. The 7,Od version update includes software and modeling corrections and a number of database updates. The MAC contracted with an aviation consulting group, HNTB Corporation, to provide INM data processing used in the preparation of the 2014 actual noise contour. 2.1.2 2014 Aircraft Operations and Fleet Mix The past 14 years have presented many challenges to the aviation industry. From a local perspective, operational levels and the aircraft fleet mix at MSP have been subject to effects from the events of September 11, 2001, high fuel prices, a flurry of bankruptcy filings by several legacy airlines including the former Northwest Airlines, and an economic recession. Additionally, overall market forces appear to be favoring consolidation, as indicated by major airline acquisitions and mergers, beginning with Delta Air Lines' acquisition of Northwest Airlines in 2008, followed by United Airlines' acquisition of Continental Airlines in 2012, the merger of American Airlines and US Airways in 2013 and the merger of Southwest Airlines and AirTran in 2014. These developments have had profound effects 10 on airline and airport operations. For example, the actual 2014 operational level at MSP is below the operational level documented at the airport over 22 years ago. The MAC derived MSP operations numbers for this study from the MAC's Noise and Operations Monitoring System ( MACNOMS) data. The MACNOMS total operations number was 0.7 percent lower than the FAA Operations Network ( OPSNET) number. To rectify the numbers, the MAC adjusted the MACNOMS data upward to equal the total 2014 FAA OPSNET number. Table 2.1 provides the total number of 2014 aircraft operations at MSP by operational category. The 2014 total operations number of 411,760 is down from the 2013 number of 4313573 (4.6 percent decrease). Considering the multi- faceted nature of the variables that are presently impacting the operational level at MSP, forecasting long -term operational implications is complex. All signs, however, in the near -term Table 2.1 seem to point to a fundamental change in the MINNEAPOLIS -ST. PAUL INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT nature of airline operations at MSP, especially 2014 Total Operations in the type of aircraft flown by all airlines and in particular by Delta Air Lines. The use of larger aircraft and the elimination of DC -9 operations by Delta Air Lines in January 2014 are examples. The use of newer, larger, and quieter manufactured Stage 3 aircraft is on the rise. Some examples at MSP of these newer aircraft are the Airbus A320/319, CRJ -900 Regional Jets, Boeing 8767- 300/400, Boeing B737- 700/800, and Boeing 777 -200. Operations Category 2014 Operations Scheduled Passenger Air Carrier (a) 375,072 Caro 12,199 Charter 190 GA b 21,862 Military 21437 GA and TOTAL 411,760 (a) Includes both air carrier and regional carrier operations (b) Includes both GA and non- scheduled air taxi operations Source: Actual year -to -date 2014 MACNOMS data adjusted to match FAA OPSNET data (to account for unavailable When comparing the DC9 hushkitted aircraft to MACNOMS operations data). the Airbus A319, 15 A319 operations would be required to generate the same noise impact as one DC9 operation. The Airbus A319 aircraft represents newer technology engine noise emission levels compared to the DC9 aircraft. Table 2.2 provides a breakdown of the 2014 aircraft fleet mix at MSP. The average daily number of Modified ( "hushkitted ") Stage 3 aircraft operations was down in 2014 to 0.1 from 0.2 in 2013. In 2014, the average daily number of total nighttime operations was 95.3, up from the 95.0 average daily nighttime operations in 2013. Overall, the 2014 total average daily operations number of 1,128.1 is down by 4.6 percent from the 1,182.4 average daily operations in 2013. 11 Table 2.2 MINNEAPOLIS -ST, PAUL INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT 2014 Aircraft Fleet Mix Averaqe Daily Operations Group Aircraft Type Day Night Total Manufactured /Re- engined Stage 3 Jet 717200 5.0 1.2 6.2 737300 6.9 1.1 8.0 737400 0.3 0.1 0.4 737500 0.0 0.0 0.0 737700 43.2 9.7 52.8 737800 46.1 13.2 59.2 737900 7.0 1.2 8.2 747200 0.0 - 0.0 74720B 0.0 - 0.0 747400 0.7 0.0 0.8 7478 OA 0.0 0.0 757300 13.5 1.1 14.6 757PW 43.3 7.0 50.3 757RR 1.7 1.6 3.3 767300 7.2 1.6 8.8 767400 1.6 0.7 2.3 767CF6 0.0 0.0 0.0 767JT9 1.3 0.1 1.4 777200 1.0 0.0 1.0 7772LR 0.1 - 0.1 A300 -622R 0.6 0.2 0.8 A310 -304 0.0 0.0 01 A319 -131 74.5 4.7 79.2 A320 -232 92.3 9.0 101.3 A321 -232 5.0 2.5 7.6 A330 -301 0.0 - 0.0 A330 -343 6.8 0.5 7.3 A340 -211 0.5 0.0 0.5 A380 -841 - 0.0 0.0 AN 124 0.0 0.0 0.0 BD100 3.6 0.3 4.0 BD700 0.2 0.0 0.3 BEC400 1.1 0.1 1.2 CL601 1.4 0.1 1.5 CLREGJ 216.3 8.0 224.4 CNA500 0.3 0.0 0.3 CNA501 0.0 - 0.0 CNA525C 0.5 0.0 0,5 CNA550 0.0 0.0 0.1 CNA551 0.0 - 0.0 CNA55B 0.4 0.0 0.5 CNA560E 1.6 0.1 1.7 CNA560U 0.5 0.0 0.5 CNA560XL 3.5 0.2 3.7 CNA650 0.8 0.0 0,8 CNA680 1.8 0.1 1.9 CNA750 4.7 0.5 5.1 CRJ701 41.1 3.5 44.6 CRJ900 111.7 4.0 115.7 D328J 0.3 0.0 0.3 DC1010 1.7 0.3 2.0 EMB135 0.1 0.0 0.1 EMB145 5.9 0.1 6.0 EMB14L 12.5 1.0 13.5 12 Table 2.2 MINNEAPOLIS -ST. PAUL INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT 2014 Aircraft Fleet Mix Average Daily Operations Group Aircraft Type Day Night Total EMB170 104.1 7.8 111.8 Man ufactured/Re-eng i ned Stage 3 Jet (cont'd) EMB175 EMB190 0.0 2.4 - 0.0 0.0 2.4 F10062 0.1 0.0 0.1 FAL10 0.1 0.0 0.1 FAL20A 1.1 0.0 1.1 FAL50 0.7 0.1 0.9 FAL900 1.1 0.1 1.2 G150 0.2 0.0 0.3 G200 1.8 0.3 2.1 GIV 1.4 0.1 1.5 GV 1.5 0.1 1.6 HK4000 0.1 0.0 0.1 HS125 HS1258 0.0 3.0 - 0.2 0.0 3.2 IA1124 0.0 0.0 0.0 [Al 125 0.1 0.0 0.1 LEAR31 0.1 0.0 0.1 LEAR35 0.8 0.1 0.8 LEAR45 1.2 0.1 1.2 LEAR55 0.1 0.0 0.1 LEAR60 0.6 0.0 0.7 MD11GE 1.8 1.3 3.2 MD11 PW 1.3 1.3 2,6 M D80 0.0 0.0 0.0 MD81 0.0 0.0 0.0 M D82 6.3 0.9 7.2 MD83 5.0 0.5 5.5 M D88 25.7 0.7 26.4 M D9025 31.1 1.1 32.2 M D9028 38.1 1.3 39.3 R390 0.2 0.0 0.3 Total 998.7 90.2 11088.8 Modified ( "Hushkitted ") Stage 3 Jet 727EM2 0.0 0.0 0.0 737N17 0.0 0.0 0.0 DC93LW 0.0 0.0 0.0 DC95HW 0.0 - 0.0 DC9Q7 0.0 - 0,0 Total 0.1 0.0 0.1 Microjet CNA510 0.2 0.0 0.2 ECLIPSE500 0.1 0.0 0.1 Total 0.3 0.0 0.3 Stage 2 Less than 75,000 lb. MTOW FAL20 0.6 1.7 2.3 Gil GULF3 0.0 0.1 - 0.0 0.0 0.1 LEAR25 0.0 0.0 0.0 SABR80 0.0 - 0.0 Total 0.7 1.7 2.4 Propeller 1900D 10.5 0.4 10.9 AC50 0.0 0.0 0.0 ATR42 1.2 0.2 1.4 ATR72 BAEJ31 BAEJ41 0.0 0.0 0.0 - - 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 BEC100 0.0 0.0 0.0 BEC200 1.1 0.1 1.2 13 Table 2.2 MINNEAPOLIS -ST, PAUL INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT 2014 Aircraft Fleet Mix Average Daily Operations Group Aircraft Type Day Night Total Propeller (cont'd) BEC300 0.7 0.0 0.7 BEC30B 0.3 0.0 0.3 BEC33 0.0 - 0.0 BEC55 0.1 - 0.1 BEC58 0.1 0.0 0.1 BEC65 6.0 1.1 7.1 BEC76 0.0 - 0.0 BEC80 1.6 0.2 1.9 BEC90 0.4 0.1 0.5 BEC99 3.2 0.5 3.7 BEC9F 0.0 0.0 0.0 BECM35 0.1 0.0 0.1 CNA172 0.1 0.0 0.1 CNA177 0.0 - 0.0 CNA180 0.0 - 0.0 CNA182 0.0 0.0 0.0 CNA185 0.0 - 0.0 CNA206 0.0 - 0.0 CNA208 0.1 0.0 0.2 CNA210 - 0.0 0.0 CNA303 0.0 0.0 0.0 CNA310 0.1 0.0 0.2 CNA340 0.0 0.0 0.0 CNA402 0.1 0.0 0.1 CNA404 0.0 - 0.0 CNA414 0.1 0.0 0.1 CNA421 0.2 0.0 0.2 CNA425 0.1 0.0 0.1 CNA441 0.1 0.0 0.1 DA42 0.0 - 0.0 DHC6 0.0 - 0.0 EMB120 0.0 0.0 0.0 GASEPV 0.0 - 0.0 M20J 0.1 0.0 0.1 M U2 0.0 0.0 0.0 P180 0.1 - 0.1 PA23AZ 0.0 - 0.0 PA24 0.0 - 0.0 PA28AR 0.0 - 0.0 PA28DK 0.0 0.0 0.0 PA31 0.1 0.0 0.1 PA31 T 0.1 0.0 0.1 PA32LA 0.0 - 0.0 PA32SG 0.0 - 0.0 PA34 0.1 0.0 0.1 PA42 0.0 0.0 0.0 PA44 0.0 - 0.0 PA46 0.0 - 0.0 PA60 0.0 0.0 0.0 PC12 0.2 0.0 0.3 RWCM14 0.0 - 0.0 RWCM69 0.0 - 0.0 SAAB20 0.0 - 0.0 SAMER3 0.0 0.0 0.0 SAMER4 4.1 0.3 4.4 SD330 0.0 - 0.0 14 Table 2.2 MINNEAPOLIS -ST. PAUL INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT 2014 Aircraft Fleet Mix Average Daily Operations Group Aircraft Type Day Night Total Propeller (cont'd) SD360 0.0 0.0 0.0 SF340 0.0 0.0 0.0 SR22 0.3 0.0 0.3 STBM7 0.0 0.0 0.0 TED600 0.1 0.0 0.1 Total 31.9 3.3 35.2 Military C-1 30E 1.0 0.0 1.0 F -1 8 HAWK KC -135 T6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 - - - - 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total 1.1 0.0 1.1 Helicopter B206L B429 R22 R44 S70 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 - - - - 0.0 0.0 0,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 S76 SA355F 0.0 0.0 - - 0.0 0.0 Total 0.1 0.0 0.1 Grand Total 11032.8 953 1,128.1 Note: Totals may differ due to rounding. Source: MAC- provided INM Input Data, HNTB 2015 2.1.3 2014 Runway Use FAA control of runway use throughout the year for arrival and departure operations at MSP has a notable effect on the noise impact around the airport. The number of people and dwellings impacted by noise is a direct result of the number of operations on a given runway and the land uses off the end of the runway. Historically, prior to the opening of Runway 17/35, arrival and departure operations occurred on the parallel runways at MSP (12L/30R and 12R/30L) in a manner that resulted in approximately 50 percent of the arrival and departure operations occurring to the northwest over South Minneapolis and 50 percent to the southeast over Mendota Heights and Eagan. As a result of the dense residential land uses to the northwest and the predominantly industrial /commercial land uses to the southeast of MSP, focusing departure operations to the southeast has long been the preferred operational configuration from a noise reduction perspective. Since the introduction of Runway 17/35 at MSP in 2005, another opportunity exists to route aircraft over an unpopulated area - the Minnesota River Valley. With use of the Runway 17 Departure Procedure, westbound departure operations are routed such that they avoid close -in residential areas southwest of Runway 17. Thus, use of Runway 17 for departure operations is the second preferred operational configuration (after Runways 12L and 12R) for noise reduction purposes. 15 Table 2.3 provides the runway use percentages for 2014. From 2013 to 2014 arrival operation percentages decreased on Runways 30R and 35 and increased on Runways 30L, 12L and 12R. There were no changes in the arrival operation percentages on Runways 4,17 and 22. The most notable changes in total arrival runway use from 2013 to 2014 were a one percent increase (from 19.4 percent to 20.4 percent) in Runway 12R arrival operations and a one percent decrease (from 18.2 percent to 17.2 percent) in Runway 35 arrival operations. The most notable change in arrival runway use during the nighttime hours was on Runway 30R, where operations increased from 20.7 percent in 2013 to 21.6 percent in 2014. Departure operations increased on Runways 4, 12R, 12L, 17 and 30L and decreased on Runway 30R from 2013 to 2014. There were no changes in departure operation percentages on Runways 22 and 35. The most notable change in total departure runway use from 2013 to 2014 was a decrease (from 26.0 percent to 23.9 percent) in Runway 30R departure operations. The most notable change in departure runway use during the nighttime hours was on Runway 30L, where operations increased from 23.1 percent in 2013 to 27.8 percent in 2014. 2.1.4 2014 Flight Tracks Table 2.3 MINNEAPOLIS -ST, PAUL INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT 2014 Runwav Use Operation Runway Da Night Total 4 0.0% 0.1% 0.0% 12L 19.5% 14.3% 19.0% 12R 19.7% 26.7% 20.4% identical to those used 17 0.0% 0.0 % 0.0% Arrivals 22 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% INM 30L 19.0% 35.5% 20.6% 30R 35 22.9% 21.6% 18.8% 1.9% 22.8% 17.2% Total 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 4 0.1% 0.3% 0.1% 12L 13.0% 14.4% 13.1% 12R 4.9% 28.3% 6.6% 17 24.0% 15.8% 23.4% Departures 22 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 30L 33.2% 27.8% 32.8% 30R 24.7% 13.4% 23.9% 35 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Total 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 4 0.1% 0.2% 0.1% 12L 16.2% 14.3% 16.0% 12R 12.2% 27.4% 13.5% 17 12.2% 6.7% 11.7% Overall 22 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 30L 26.2% 32.2% 26.7% 30R 23.8% 18.1% 23.3% 35 9.3% 1.1% 8.6% Total 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% Note: Totals may not add up to 100% due to rounding. The INM departure and arrival flight track locations used to develop the 2014 actual noise contour were identical to those used for the 2013 actual noise Source: MAC - provided INM Input Data, HNTB 2015 contour. These flight tracks differ from those used to develop the 2007 forecast mitigated noise contour due to enhanced modeling methods and improved technologies. Sub - tracks were also added to each of the backbone tracks. The INM's standard distribution was used in distributing the flights to the sub - tracks. The same methodology as in previous annual reports was used to assign 2014 radar data to the INM flight tracks. The radar -to -INM flight track correlation process employs a best -fit analysis of the radar flight track data based on linear trends. This approach provides the ability to match each radar flight track directly to the appropriate INM track. Figures 2.1 to 2.16 provide the updated backbone INM departure and arrival flight track and the use information used to develop the 2014 actual noise contour. 2.1.5 2014 Atmospheric Conditions The MAC gathered atmospheric data for the 2014 actual noise contour from the Minnesota State Climatology Office. The 2014 annual average temperature of 43.6 degrees Fahrenheit and 2014 average annual wind speed of 8.3 knots were used in the INM modeling process. The 2014 average annual pressure of 29.99 inches of Mercury and a 2014 annual average relative humidity of 66.65 percent were also used. 16 t 2014 1 N Tracks - Runway p 30L Departure t r INM Track Use Percentage Overall Use Percentage ; Figure 2.1 I t 0%-2% ge 14.7% a X21.1% I1 a o 23.5 /o J� NA/ I t ry I.P ��N `- ..:��,' 't- > •;z L $ P Grp N If file if �` '` _ gig",• I � - -,�.�" `- , .. e �y{ uf-;v +jam.»,._.... ........ i""t'�'""'�'" �rl�°�- 1 .., __ � I if a j� 0 2.5 zy 5 10 ffffl a Milesy 17 p i 2014 INM Tracks - Runway 30R Departures fI ,F Overall Use Percentage I a Figure 2.2..: .: if ie f § k ®R �, "o n } mM, if IfA if iv TI. ;Pf a i lx.r -.S if t I t S 1 Tf If if If If I fif 11 MAI f. {� a i > fie, 1 Yt, 1W if 3 . fiiifi¢ 4 °4 11, if if N iiTI IT If If If _ fl" kL 3 t . �,a: ,. t t a r {{ If if 1. � k 1.� E, If Ik b R -. SI f Iff q& t � 4 , f INM Track Use Percentage fiff 0 % -2% 2%-4% If /" jr 5 ion'' al 7%-8.8% -� Miles II[ s i a t r i } ~h i # 6VI NO 11 v: /j rIll dIt x I i yy,,. '`{ t Vmoi in m ,xFs� i ��in , A g . t 3 'A 3� If % , 1 g a, F Cap RlN I. Intl If It if ZIf Il IV s s } 1 Af r im ' ;5. n}• - ! \� t ffi r I r I. _ If Vl G3 IIIJI _ „—,•I I IV ,a Itellpol al If I oil s C Q� � ..._� � $ :.I`1 ar� � L t4 �� �' t it ,� _ d , •_ ro AlfItlllfftf C N t 14 �r 47, Ic LL vIIII It N (0 Irttl OR OR Ayp ; ip If r 1 —_c a 19 2014 INM Tracks - Runway 12L Departures - Overall Use Percentage \ to Figure 2.4 A� -; ad � IT g( IT S"x 1 (1'y }$ el �i P µ. TIT �� ILLL A I, tx if IT k i y x �F �j Ti�st t3s tj « sR "If It i, r- ^" ` IT !a; — Ile i- t i_ ,i 0 UT 's5 3 , x3 >e kit �> r � AN � x,I b I t I IT l' t: } ,i tt e � L t. .. A> t '^ f INM Track Use Percen 0%-2% —2%-4% 4% —6% 6 %— 7.8% i- CL lip co 01 �1 ti N V (AI',{ t p AM Z F I i r : 1 All i IL \V fd_L � �' '� _ __ • II n ^ i $µ {� 0.9 - L..l i $� l 3 ilk' x _• � c � � .... -_ '�, M�ay V' Ce .vskfify i. v.i� �, x1 /'1•'1'u � a { � �.. S 1 i I� � � `~ -.Y�p t 3 dr�y< 1, I d,r Lo I .1 xY ILYrxril IL 17y..1'___J t v p� ol j cu ,� s,. ,fir : a s,-• „j k s ORI : 21 F:Vem 2014 1NM Tracks - Runway 22 Departures Overall Use Percentage Figure 2.6 NO ®R { INM Track Use Percentage ¢ �� ,,e a.. r� 0%-2% _ 2% -5% 5%-10% 10% - 18.9 %� °fir rr g a: Yj� `7 1 al .F, sou tl It icy 14 1 f "We WN lip � y �t �. ,. ���' �� _ g+z � � -f' � X48 y•' ®i ¢ }j0.a :.i r .'<L'.k• Tis'9. atva z}'mtt ��ig*g .s " #'' 1 , Z I. V Tom` I � ,3 Sy 4 :.. 1 � (� .. 3 B S� £� } � * � � ���� r � � • i `'39 ` res Irrrr ..,. i PIE 22 a' P /cu d a ) C M C 0 n C77 .he a .. LL to f f0 �.. � o OR z i I f :e . i rvsssn4'•£ 4 a P E ". 9 ,.,,LA -.. uxu ff1 p a: r 'ti 1 i m n tf all a. {lip ,E if 3: WW 23 1 I ._ � Q r i• .� n� d ' AA CO a N N 1 a It 10 W A� , , 'sue 33 1 v V it VA It ie- ik '„��• J... ,�e „ .... ,.,,,, ,,.,,.,.,,,�, � � \'>„!�''�*�'r � ,,.f�., ' � erg:: ' 4 y. Later. a j K4 „sue -.sue `"j]"_ ' ` ,� y - •..• ^-<rt— s s���,� •- ..�.'. f Ix ItIt I• v �:( • A ,4ijP f it Lixg * F { 3 Ij /fir '1t 'sue" Fm w /W� M W a } ". It N4 AM x a s fl ¢j II k wv 1 ISO 1 §Y o kits-� i 0 °? I c N �. i o lei WIM fp �Illm O M w UPC = �...: Nk f r t ° ' 1 S! , CL rt c "M Nil 1 N co All co �x� �"^ O • V COQ .Sii Mt 4 } ,.. e 25 j 1... . _ _ _ -:�1 ADA Ol if j e s- ,. � Y f z?# -------- -- ,z'..:2 Ip 7 80 Y N N Id t N j I Ym has zl� . ,r t Ir 2 a i vlj. r. �5S Off 3 t A ( v f � d s z. All o p { Or x t 3Q { , -.. � �., t; -..,.. .,�,,., tip +"�,"- -- -".`_ r 41 ap- VZ' L� Ir 1 � Al CY.1 N to N 1 E a S WM O 3 , 26 I � �; rE !J. " '}� Y ar, � pis 3 r z 1 ob tit I It At I I - -�. 52 It � r� jOut I`- 1,,I ALIJ i SO� NO IWO NN IPI fi 1 x, (U _ ry LL O M N (D QQ In '� i ,` F, %$ flph -<� - ....�,. �( _ y.��, Ma z k t TV tt 0 a© z 27 0 LL U \ \ 'ct O " N O N M r LO N ,,I tit C z P fi - -1 v i y55 r vz ZI 1 4 AM rrrr Y x ff �} Kel sl � U a N e om (n j Y 7 ? c � .Y N o o . 2 > - ON CO O f' Z O (D r (NO N I I I { r� '° 3rAy f m � a •,, •,, ? ``a -, t to f it 4 t Y s F � VP i tt r : ���8 .. �., o -� IN - i'v°.'S�6 N ry WE IN 29 `Y I �; 2014 INM Tracks -Runway 35 Arrivals IV u Overall Use Percentage k I X14 Y� Figure 2.14 It `Sa Ty' 4 It tew eat 'r r � It If It ZA I Its Y n ' s .` fie c #t -� If If f; tit It If F f }S yS - 7 SM j it Ir INM Track Use Percentage - -- 0% - 0.4% 1.4 46.1 MS. 49.1 I [ 0 0.5 1 2 Mlles 30 ^ Y,' n M 4 - F ?I R" x � k .. 3 Y`� 7 C x X .m IN .1 tk t ( s » �� ✓`s. �..� '.(L ��.�� Fyn ..✓.: '� ,�.y...r�,.�. St� 1 � �.,..y.�.- fi , i l� ax r ss°rd IA If r. -J If I- U ' ^ yC"' _ �� N LL kR LO CY) j e ' Y N M VE 0 Li 31 1 1 . c Al ! i If ^ Y,' n M 4 - F ?I R" x � k .. 3 Y`� 7 C x X .m IN .1 tk t ( s » �� ✓`s. �..� '.(L ��.�� Fyn ..✓.: '� ,�.y...r�,.�. St� 1 � �.,..y.�.- fi , i l� ax r ss°rd IA If r. -J If I- U ' ^ yC"' _ �� N LL kR LO CY) j e ' Y N M VE 0 Li 31 ? \ 2014 INM Tracks - Runway 17 Arrivals ........... =.y Overall Use Percentage INM Track Use Percentage " ` Figure 2.16 1.3% i jjj J VIM (L 20% s S ME 26.6% 52% r! .) FIN X, ter' it j it 4 t ' y -1 1 IF sr FF F 11 IF 71 1 j '° IF 11 IF IF E t p rl t ! jj 1 W fi 1 r{ . Vi ;r� ! ( F t{ �' IF �r. {j h � � � �t 1 ell ...= r i� SFrs _V Fill IF IF �„uc.»z ' �. e .r ; Jj,i, .. -..» I IF -- ,.s x al r.<s ,y z j tR IF Fir IF IF If i. -`u' g fi y Yipsi. i % VA IF IF IF IF iL "FIZI, 414 ! . �.J i es IS ,y .« � .,.,.I Fr E �I .� � ' t: 2; IF J It OFF __ 13 IF FF WWI eF s, n iI - .,. Fj kA IF siFiii a� tl-�—` I ?y g"aa t 3 g CT ry Iii II, IF I IF IF IF ,��2 �, f 1 `w� f ° L,�i ?� '.`><� � I= ` ! „�. IF M11 32 As part of the 2014 actual noise contour development process, an analysis was conducted by the MAC to compare the INM- developed 2014 DNL noise contours to actual measured aircraft noise levels at the 39 MAC Noise and Operations Monitoring System ( MACNOMS) Remote Monitoring Towers (RMTs) around MSP. An INM grid point analysis determined the model's predicted 2014 DNL noise levels at each of the RMT locations (determined in the INM by the latitude and longitude coordinates of each RMT). Table 2.4 provides a comparison of the INM grid point analysis at each MACNOMS RMT site, based on the 2014 actual noise contour as produced with the INM, and the actual MACNOMS monitored aircraft DNLs at those locations in 2014. The average absolute difference between the modeled and measured DNLs was 2.2 dB (the 2013 average absolute difference was 2.3 dB). The median difference was 1.5 dB (the 2013 median difference was 1.7 dB). There were 10 MACNOMS RMTs that reported slightly higher DNL levels than the INM model generated. The MAC believes that this is due in part to the inclusive approach MAC staff has taken in tuning MACNOMS noise -to -track matching parameters. This conservative approach, along with the increasing number of quieter jets operating at the airport, results in increased instances of community- driven noise events being attributed to quieter aircraft operating at further distances from the monitoring location. The use of absolute values provides a perspective of total difference between the INM modeled values and the measured DNL values provided by MACNOMS in 2014. The median is considered the most reliable indicator of correlation when considering the data variability across modeled and monitored data. Overall, the small variation between the actual MACNOMS monitored aircraft noise levels and the INM modeled noise levels provides additional external system verification that the INM is providing an accurate assessment of the actual aircraft noise impacts around MSP. Table 2.4 MINNEAPOLIS -ST. PAUL INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT 2014 Measured vs. Modeled INM DNL Values at RMT Locations Notes: All units in dB DNL (a) computed from daily DNLs SOURCE: MAC RMT data and HNTB INM, 2015 33 2014 Annual 2014 Difference (Modeled RMT Measured DNL Modeled minus Measured Site (a ) DNL Sign Absolute 1 55.2 55.9 0.7 0:7 2 57.4 56.8 -0.6 0.6 3 62.3 62.5 0.2 0.2 4 58.7 59.6 0.9 0.9 5 67.4 67.6 0.2 0.2 6 66.9 64.6 -2.3 2.3 7 59.3 57.7 -1.6 1.6 8 55.4 54.8 -0.6 0.6 9 39.4 41.9 2.5 2.5 10 44.4 47.4 3.0 3.0 11 40.1 43.6 3.5 3.5 12 39.6 45.9 6.3 6.3 13 52.8 52.8 0.0 0.0 14 59.4 59.6 0.2 0.2 15 54.7 53.4 -1.3 1.3 16 63.7 62.3 -1.4 1.4 17 42.9 47.3 4.4 4.4 18 53.0 57.6 4.6 4.6 19 48.4 52.2 3.8 3.8 20 43.2 49.5 6.3 6.3 21 45.7 47.9 2.2 2.2 22 54.2 56.0 1.8 1.8 23 59.5 58.0 -1.5 1.5 24 58.1 58.6 0.5 0.5 25 50.0 53.0 3.0 3.0 26 51.0 50.5 -0.5 0.5 27 54.1 54.9 0.8 0.8 28 55.6 59.5 3.9 3.9 29 51.2 51.8 0.6 0.6 30 59.7 58.9 -0.8 0.8 31 45.6 49.1 3.5 3.5 32 40.7 46.9 6.2 6.2 33 44.4 48.4 4.0 4.0 34 40.8 46.9 6.1 6.1 35 51.4 52.8 1.4 1.4 36 52.4 51.4 -1.0 1.0 37 45.2 47.2 2.0 2.0 38 48.6 49.1 0.5 0.5 39 49.2 49.9 0.7 0.7 Average 2.2 Median 1.5 Notes: All units in dB DNL (a) computed from daily DNLs SOURCE: MAC RMT data and HNTB INM, 2015 33 Based on the 411,760 total operations in 2014, approximately 3,478.9 acres are in the 65 DNL noise contour (a decrease of 25.0 acres from the 2013 actual noise contour) and approximately 8,758.4 acres are in the 60 DNL noise contour (an addition of 14.3 acres from the 2013 actual noise contour). Table 2.5 contains the count of single - family (one to three units per structure) and multi - family (more than three units per structure) dwelling units in the 2014 actual noise contours. The MAC based the counts on the block intersect methodology where all structures on a block that are within or touched by the noise contour are counted. Table 2.5 MINNEAPOLIS- ST.PAUL INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT Summary of 2014 Actual DNL Noise Contour Single- Family and Multi - Familv Unit Counts °units tnaraeclinea mitigation or were determined to be ineligible for participation in the current program are not included in the table. Source: HNTB provided INM contours, MAC analysis, 2015 The 2014 count of residential un around MSP is 391, an increase increase is due, in large part, operations on Runway 12R. All reduction mitigation package. is within the actual of 73 percent from to an increase in homes within the 60 DNL noise contour the total of 226 based nighttime operations 2014 actual 65 DNL that have not received noise mitigation on the 2013 actual noise contours. The in 2014, particularly nighttime arrival contour have received the 5 dB noise A depiction of the 2014 actual noise contour is provided in Figure 2.17. The 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013 and 2014 actual noise contours are provided in Figure 2.18. The 2014 actual 65 DNL noise contour is 0.7 percent smaller than the 2013 actual 65 DNL noise contour and the 2014 actual 60 DNL noise contour is 0.2 percent larger than the 2013 actual 60 DNL noise contour. 34 (Block Intersect Implementation Method, Completed Reflect All Units Completed Prior to February 2015) Dwelling Units Within DNL (dB) Interval City Count Single - Family Multi - Family 60 -64 65 -69 70 -74 75+ Total 60 -64 65 -69 70 -74 75+ Total Minneapolis Completed 51668 19029 69697 669 164 - 833 Additional 302 - - - 302 89 - 89 Total 51970 11029 - - 61999 758 164 - 922 Bloomington Completed 8 1 - - 9 457 - - 457 Additional - - - - - Total 8 1 - 9 457 - - 457 Richfield Completed 570 570 66 - 66 Additional - Total 570 - 570 66 - 66 Eagan Completed 166 166 - - Additional - - - Total 166 - - 166 - - - Mendota Heights Completed 2 1 - 3 - - Additional - - - - Total 2 1 - - 3 - All Cities Completed 6,414 11031 - - 7,445 11192 164 - 1,356 Additional 302 - - 302 89 - 89 Total 6,716 11031 - 7,747 1,281 164 - 1,445 °units tnaraeclinea mitigation or were determined to be ineligible for participation in the current program are not included in the table. Source: HNTB provided INM contours, MAC analysis, 2015 The 2014 count of residential un around MSP is 391, an increase increase is due, in large part, operations on Runway 12R. All reduction mitigation package. is within the actual of 73 percent from to an increase in homes within the 60 DNL noise contour the total of 226 based nighttime operations 2014 actual 65 DNL that have not received noise mitigation on the 2013 actual noise contours. The in 2014, particularly nighttime arrival contour have received the 5 dB noise A depiction of the 2014 actual noise contour is provided in Figure 2.17. The 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013 and 2014 actual noise contours are provided in Figure 2.18. The 2014 actual 65 DNL noise contour is 0.7 percent smaller than the 2013 actual 65 DNL noise contour and the 2014 actual 60 DNL noise contour is 0.2 percent larger than the 2013 actual 60 DNL noise contour. 34 ,k t z ...... _. ...... 1 .......... „..... ,,, .._. (A % If LL pp Q i Kati € s .� ..E1WNZI:0:9lld- .. ..d '3 rte= , it �. t i r � , t s c : is a` �i I � s. j '*' :.� ;� c' gar ?. ............ .... .......f1N _..M....!f Am I M r r yl f v ....... 4 � H am , ._..._,.. 35 O M7l I HOVM . .. � n F M 9)rn 2E 3m: O 00 N js 4 r O cc a N L u C5 0 4 FF t� T 0 m v C C A 1%4� rlof!% Im �j 36 PMDAffi� I Ir C U�6 C-3 .E 00 4 �] ................ I MM This chapter provides a detailed comparative analysis of the 2014 actual and 2007 forecast mitigated noise contours, focusing on the significant noise modeling variables and noise impacts at MSP. 3.1.1 Integrated Noise Model Considerations To develop the actual 2014 contour HNTB used Integrated Noise Model (INM) Version 7.0d, which incorporates lateral attenuation capabilities and updates to noise and performance data for commercial aircraft, updates to substitution aircraft data, and corrections to minor software issues. HNTB developed the 2007 forecast mitigated contour using INM Version 6.1. It is important to note that changes to the model over time can change the size and shape of a noise contour. For example, the improvements to lateral attenuation adjustment algorithms and flight path segmentation in INM 7.0 (versus those used in version 6.1) were found by the FAA to increase the size of a DNL contour fora range of case study airports between 3 and 10 percent over what previous versions of INM would have modeled. 3.1.2 Aircraft Operations and Fleet Mix Comparison Table 3.1 provides a comparison of total MSP operations by operational category used in the 2007 forecast mitigated noise contour and the 2014 actual noise contour. As indicated in Table 3.1, the 2014 actual total MSP operations number of 411,760 represents a 29.3 percent reduction from the 2007 forecast mitigated total operations number of 582,366. Scheduled passenger air carrier and cargo operations accounted for the majority of the reduction. However, it is notable that charter operations were 96.7 percent below the 2007 forecast mitigated number. Table 3.2 provides a comparison of the 2007 forecast mitigated noise contour fleet mix and the 2014 actual noise Table 3.1 MINNEAPOLIS -ST, PAUL INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT Comparison of 2007 Forecast Mitigated and 2014 Actual Total Operations Operations Category 2014 Actual 2007 Forecast Scheduled Passenger Air Carrier a 375,072 523,472 Cargo 12,199 21,158 Charter 190 51766 GA b 21,862 28,846 Military 22437 311.24 TOTAL 411,760 582,366 (a) Includes both air carrier and regional carrier operations (b) Includes both GA and non - scheduled air taxi operations Source: Actual 2014 MACNOMS data adjusted to match FAA OPSNET data (to account for unavailable MACNOMS operations data). 37 contour fleet mix2. An assessment of average daily operations per aircraft type with daytime and nighttime operation statistics is provided. Table 3.2 MINNEAPOLIS -ST. PAUL INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT Comparison of 2007 Mitigated Forecast Fleet Mix and 2014 Actual Fleet Mix Average Daily Operations Day Night Total Difference Group Aircraft Type 2007 2014 2007 2014 2007 2014 Forecast Forecast Actual Forecast Actual Forecast Actual and Actual Manufactured 717200 7.3 5.0 1.0 1.2 8.3 6.2 2.1 /Re- engined 737300 48.2 6.9 3.5 1.1 51.7 8.0 43.7 Stage 3 Jet 737400 0.1 0.3 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.4 -0.3 737500 5.7 0.0 0.5 0.0 6.2 0.0 6.2 737700 7.8 43.2 0.5 9.7 8.3 52.8 -44.5 737800 65.5 46.1 12.6 13.2 78.1 59.2 18.9 737900 5.7 7.0 0.5 1.2 6.2 8.2 -2.0 747100 0.0 - 0.0 - 0.0 - 0.0 747200 0.0 0.0 0.0 - 0.0 0.0 0.0 74720B - 0.0 - - - 0.0 0.0 747400 1.9 0.7 0.2 0.0 2.1 0.8 1.3 7478 - 0.0 - 0.0 - 0.0 0.0 757300 34.1 13.5 1.1 1.1 35.1 14.6 20.5 757PW 88.4 43.3 8.6 7.0 97.1 50.3 46.8 757RR - 1.7 - 1.6 - 3.3 -3.3 767200 1.2 - 0.5 - 1.7 - 1.7 767300 - 7.2 - 1.6 - 8.8 -8.8 767400 - 1.6 - 0.7 - 2.3 -2.3 767CF6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 767JT9 - 1.3 - 0.1 - 1.4 -1.4 777200 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 -1.0 7772LR - 0.1 - - - 0.1 -0.1 A300 -622R 4.8 0.6 4.2 0.2 9.1 0.8 8.3 A310 -304 1.4 0.0 1.3 0.0 2.7 0.1 2.6 A318 5.7 - 0.5 - 6.2 - 6.2 A319 -131 149.1 74.5 3.9 4.7 153.0 79.2 73.8 A320 -211 173.4 - 16.5 - 189.9 - 189.9 A320 -232 - 92.3 - 9.0 - 101.3 -101.3 A321 -232 0.0 5.0 0.0 2.5 0.0 7.6 -7.6 A330 -301 6.2 0.0 0.0 - 6.2 0.0 6.2 A330 -343 - 6.8 - 0.5 - 7.3 -7.3 A340 2.1 - 0.0 - 2.1 - 2.1 A340 -211 - 0.5 - 0.0 - 0.5 -0.5 A380 -841 - - - 0.0 - 0.0 0.0 AN124 - 0.0 - 0.0 - 0.0 0.0 ASTR 2.3 - 0.2 - 2.5 - 2.5 BA46 74.3 - 2.2 - 76.5 - 76.5 BD100 - 3.6 - 0.3 - 4.0 -4.0 BD700 - 0.2 - 0.0 - 0.3 -0.3 BEC400 0.0 1.1 0.0 0.1 0.0 1.2 -1.2 CL600 0.0 - 0.0 - 0.0 - 0.0 CL601 264.1 1.4 14.7 0.1 278.8 1.5 277.3 CLREGJ - 216.3 - 8.0 - 224.4 -224.4 z Some INM aircraft types were not available at the time of the preparation of the 2007 forecast noise contour. 38 Table 3.2 MINNEAPOLIS -ST. PAUL INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT Comparison of 2007 Mitigated Forecast Fleet Mix and 2014 Actual Fleet Mix Average Daily Operations Day Night Total Difference Group Aircraft Type 2007 2014 2007 2014 2007 2014 Forecast Forecast Actual Forecast Actual Forecast Actual and Actual Manufactured CNA500 1.4 0.3 0.1 0.0 1,4 0.3 1.1 /Re- engined CNA501 0.0 0.0 0.0 - 0.0 0.0 0.0 Stage 3 Jet CNA525 0.0 - 0.0 - 0.0 - 0.0 (cont'd) CNA525C - 0.5 - 0.0 0.5 -0,5 CNA550 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 -0.1 CNA551 0.0 0.0 0.0 - 0.0 0.0 0.0 CNA55B - 0.4 - 0.0 - 0.5 -0.5 CNA560 0.0 - 0.0 - 0.0 - 0.0 CNA560E 1.6 - 0.1 - 1.7 -1.7 CNA560U 0.5 - 0.0 - 0.5 -0.5 CNA560XL - 3.5 - 0.2 - 3.7 -3.7 CNA650 4.9 0.8 0.6 0.0 5,5 0.8 4.7 CNA680 - 1.8 - 0.1 - 1.9 -1.9 CNA750 4.6 4.7 0.3 0.5 4,9 5.1 -0.2 CRJ701 - 41.1 - 3.5 - 44.6 -44.6 CRJ900 111.7 - 4.0 - 115.7 -115.7 D328J - 0.3 - 0.0 - 0.3 -0,3 DC1010 9.6 1.7 3.8 0.3 13.4 2.0 11.4 DC820 0.0 - 0.0 - 0.0 - 0.0 DC860 0.0 - 0.0 - 0.0 - 0.0 DC870 0.0 - 1.4 - 1.4 - 1.4 EMB110 0.0 - 0.0 - 0.0 - 0.0 EMB135 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0,0 0.1 -0.1 EMB145 45.3 5.9 0.2 0.1 45.5 6.0 39.5 EMB14L 12.5 - 1.0 - 13.5 -13.5 EMB170 0.0 104.1 0.0 7.8 0.0 111.8 -111.8 EMB175 - 0.0 - - 0.0 0.0 EMB190 0.0 2.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.4 -2.4 F10062 0.1 - 0.0 0.1 -0.1 FAL10 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 -0.1 FAL200 0.0 - 0.0 - 0.0 - 0.0 FAL20A 1.0 1.1 0.7 0.0 1.7 1.1 0.6 FAL50 - 0.7 - 0.1 - 0.9 -0.9 FAL900 - 1.1 - 0.1 - 1.2 -1.2 G150 0.2 - 0.0 - 0.3 -0.3 G200 - 1.8 - 0.3 - 2.1 -2.1 GIV 2.6 1.4 0.2 0.1 2.8 1.5 1.3 GULF1 0.0 - 0.0 - 0.0 - 0.0 GV 0.8 1.5 0.1 0.1 0.9 1.6 -0.7 HK4000 0.1 - 0.0 - 0.1 -0.1 HS125 0.0 0.0 0.0 - 0.0 0.0 0.0 HS1258 - 3.0 - 0.2 - 3.2 -3.2 0 Table 3.2 MINNEAPOLIS -ST, PAUL INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT Comparison of 2007 Mitigated Forecast Fleet Mix and 2014 Actual Fleet Mix Average Daily Operations Day Night Total Difference Group Aircraft Type 2007 2014 2007 2014 2007 2014 Forecast Forecast Actual Forecast Actual Forecast Actual and Actual Manufactured IA1124 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 /Re- engined IA1125 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 -0.1 Stage 3 Jet L101 0.6 - 0.2 - 0.8 - 0.8 (cont'd) LEAR31 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 -0.1 LEAR35 26.0 0.8 2.3 0.1 28.4 0.8 27.6 LEAR45 0.0 1.2 0.0 0.1 0.0 1.2 -1.2 LEAR55 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 -0.1 LEAR60 0.0 0.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.7 -0.7 MD11GE 0.3 1.8 0.4 1.3 0.7 3.2 -2.5 MD11 PW - 1.3 - 1.3 - 2.6 -2.6 M D80 - 0.0 - 0.0 - 0.0 0.0 MD81 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.6 0.0 0.6 MD82 - 6.3 - 0.9 - 7.2 -7.2 MD83 17.0 5.0 1.6 0.5 18.6 5.5 13.1 MD88 - 25.7 - 0.7 - 26.4 -26.4 M D9025 0.0 31.1 0.0 1.1 0.0 32.2 -32.2 MD9028 - 38.1 - 1.3 - 39.3 -39.3 MU300 7.2 - 0.6 - 7.8 - 7.8 R390 - 0.2 - 0.0 - 0.3 -0.3 SABR65 0.0 - 0.0 - 0.0 - 0.0 SBR2 0.4 - 0.0 - 0.4 - 0.4 Total 1071.5 998.7 85.0 90.2 1156.7 1,088.8 67.9 Modified 727EM2 8.0 0.0 6.4 0.0 14.4 0.0 14.4 ( "Hushkitted ") 737N17 - 0.0 - 0.0 - 0.0 0.0 Stage 3 Jet 737Q 0.0 - 0.0 - 0.0 - 0.0 BAC111 0.0 - 0.0 - 0.0 - 0.0 DC93LW - 0.0 - 0.0 - 0.0 0.0 DC95HW - 0.0 - - - 0.0 0.0 DC9Q 245.3 - 15.3 - 260.5 - 260.5 DC9Q7 - 0.0 - - - 0.0 0.0 Total 253.3 0.1 21.7 0.0 274.9 0.1 274.8 Microjet CNA510 - 0.2 - 0.0 - 0.2 -0.2 ECLIPSE500 - 0.1 - 0.0 - 0.1 -0.1 Total - 0.3 - 0.0 - 0.3 -0.3 Stage 2 Less FAL20 - 0.6 - 1.7 - 2.3 -2.3 than 75,000 Gil 2.1 0.0 0.2 - 2.3 0.0 2.3 lb. MTOW GULF3 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 -0.1 LEAR24 0.0 - 0.0 - 0.0 - 0.0 LEAR25 2.1 0.0 0.4 0.0 2.5 0.0 2.5 SABR75 0.0 - 0.0 - 0.0 - 0.0 SABR80 - 0.0 - - 0.0 0.0 Total 4.2 0.7 0.6 1.7 4.8 2.4 2.4 .l Table 3.2 MINNEAPOLIS -ST, PAUL INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT Comparison of 2007 Mitigated Forecast Fleet Mix and 2014 Actual Fleet Mix Average Daily Operations Day Night Total Difference Group Aircraft Type 2007 2014 2007 2014 2007 2014 Forecast Forecast Actual Forecast Actual Forecast Actual and Actual Propeller 1900D - 10.5 - 0.4 - 10.9 -10.9 A748 0.0 - 0.0 - 0.0 - 0.0 AC50 - 0.0 - 0.0 - 0.0 0.0 ATR42 - 1.2 - 0.2 - 1.4 -1.4 ATR72 - 0.0 - - - 0.0 0.0 BAEJ31 - 0.0 - - - 0.0 0.0 BAEJ41 - 0.0 - 0.0 - 0.0 0.0 BEC100 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 BEC190 0.0 - 0.0 - 0.0 - 0.0 BEC200 0.0 1.1 0.0 0.1 0.0 1.2 -1.2 BEC23 0.0 - 0.0 - 0.0 - 0.0 BEC300 0.0 0.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.7 -0.7 BEC30B 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.3 -0.3 BEC33 0.0 0.0 0.0 - 0.0 0.0 0.0 BEC55 0.0 0.1 0.0 - 0.0 0.1 -0.1 BEC58 14.3 0.1 4.7 0.0 19.0 0.1 18.9 BEC60 0.0 - 0.0 - 0.0 - 0.0 BEC65 0.0 6.0 0.0 1.1 0.0 7.1 -7.1 BEC76 - 0.0 - - - 0.0 0.0 BEC80 0.0 1.6 0.0 0.2 0.0 1.9 -1.9 BEC90 0.0 0.4 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.5 -0.5 BEC95 0.0 - 0.0 - 0.0 - 0.0 BEC99 0.0 3.2 0.0 0.5 0.0 3.7 -3.7 BEC9F - 0.0 - 0.0 - 0.0 0.0 BECM35 - 0.1 - 0.0 - 0.1 -0.1 BL26 0.0 - 0.0 - 0.0 - 0.0 CNA150 0.0 - 0.0 - 0.0 - 0.0 CNA172 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 -0.1 CNA177 0.0 0.0 0.0 - 0.0 0.0 0.0 CNA180 0.0 0.0 0.0 - 0.0 0.0 0.0 CNA182 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 CNA185 0.0 0.0 0.0 - 0.0 0.0 0.0 CNA205 0.0 - 0.0 - 0.0 - 0.0 CNA206 0.0 0.0 0.0 - 0.0 0.0 0.0 CNA208 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 -0.2 CNA210 0.0 - 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 CNA303 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 CNA310 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 -0.2 CNA320 0.0 - 0.0 - 0.0 - 0.0 CNA337 0.0 - 0.0 - 0.0 - 0.0 CNA340 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 CNA401 0.0 - 0.0 - 0.0 - 0.0 41 Group (cont'd) Table 3.2 MINNEAPOLIS -ST, PAUL INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT Comparison of 2007 Mitigated Forecast Fleet Mix and 2014 Actual Fleet Mix Averaae Daily Operations MEN "u '"' l ` I Difference Aircraft Type 2007 2014 2007 2014 2007 2014 Forecast Forecast Actual Forecast Actual Forecast Actual and Actual CNA402 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 -0.1 CNA404 0.0 0.0 0.0 - 0.0 0.0 0.0 CNA414 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 -0.1 CNA421 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 -0.2 CNA425 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 -0.1 CNA441 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 -0.1 DA42 - 0.0 - - - 0.0 0.0 DHC6 22.5 0.0 4.4 - 26.8 0.0 26.8 DHC8 0.0 - 0.0 - 0.0 - 0.0 DO328 0.0 - 0.0 - 0.0 - 0.0 EMB120 - 0.0 - 0.0 - 0.0 0.0 FK27 0.1 - 0.0 - 0.1 - 0.1 GASEPF 1.3 - 0.3 - 1.6 - 1.6 GASEPV 3.7 0.0 0.5 - 4.3 0.0 4.3 M20J 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 -0,1 MU2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 P180 - 0.1 - - - 0.1 -0.1 PA23AZ 0.0 0.0 0.0 - 0.0 0.0 0.0 PA24 0.0 0.0 0.0 - 0.0 0.0 0.0 PA28 0.0 - 0.0 - 0.0 - 0.0 PA28AR 0.0 - - - 0.0 0.0 PA28DK - 0.0 - 0.0 - 0.0 0.0 PA31 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 -0.1 PA31 T - 0.1 - 0.0 - 0.1 -0.1 PA32LA 0.0 0.0 0.0 - 0.0 0.0 0.0 PA32SG - 0.0 - - - 0.0 0.0 PA34 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 -0.1 PA42 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 PA44 0.0 0.0 0.0 - 0.0 0.0 0.0 PA46 0.0 0.0 0.0 - 0.0 0.0 0.0 PA60 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 PC12 - 0.2 - 0.0 - 0.3 -0.3 RWCM14 - 0.0 - - - 0.0 0.0 RWCM69 0.0 0.0 0.0 - 0.0 0.0 0.0 SAAB20 - 0.0 - - - 0.0 0.0 SAMER2 0.0 - 0.0 - 0.0 - 0.0 SAMER3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 SAMER4 0.0 4.1 0.0 0.3 0.0 4.4 -4.4 SD330 0.0 0.0 0.0 - 0.0 0.0 0.0 SD360 - 0.0 - 0.0 - 0.0 0.0 SF340 93.3 0.0 5.9 0.0 99.2 0.0 99.2 SR22 - 0.3 - 0.0 - 0.3 -0.3 MEN Table 3.2 MINNEAPOLIS -ST. PAUL INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT Comparison of 2007 Mitigated Forecast Fleet Mix and 2014 Actual Fleet Mix Average Daily Operations Day Night Total Difference Group Aircraft Type 2007 2014 2007 2014 2007 2014 Forecast Forecast Actual Forecast Actual Forecast Actual and Actual Propeller STBM7 - 0.0 - 0.0 - 0.0 0.0 (cont'd) TED600 - 0:1 - 0.0 - 0.1 -0.1 Total 135.2 31,9 15.8 3.3 151.0 35.2 115.8 Helicopter Al 09 0.0 - 0.0 - 0.0 - 0.0 B206L 0.0 0.0 0.0 - 0.0 0.0 0.0 B212 0.0 - 0.0 - 0.0 - 0.0 B222 0.0 0.0 0.0 - 0.0 B429 - 0.0 - - - 0.0 0.0 EC130 0.0 0.0 0,0 - 0.0 R22 - 0.0 - - - 0.0 0.0 R44 - 0.0 - - - 0.0 0.0 S70 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 S76 - 0.0 - - - 0.0 0.0 SA355F - 0.0 - - - 0.0 0.0 Total 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 -0.1 Military C-1 30E 7.8 1.0 0.2 0.0 8,0 1.0 7.0 F -1 8 0.0 0.0 0.0 - 0.0 0.0 0.0 HAWK - 0.0 - - 0.0 0.0 KC135 0.0 0.0 0.0 - 0.0 0.0 0.0 T6 - 0.0 - - - 0.0 0.0 C17 0.0 - 0.0 - 0.1 - 0.1 C5 0.1 - 0.0 - 0.1 - 0.1 C9A 0.0 - 0.0 - 0.0 - 0.0 F1'6GE 0.1 - 0.0 - 0.1 - 0.1 T1 0.0 - 0.0 - 0.0 - 0.0 T34 0.0 - 0.0 - 0.0 - 0.0 T37 0.1 - 0:0 - 0.1 - 0.1 T38 0.1 - 0.0 - 0.1 - 0.1 U21 0.0 - 0.0 - 0.0 - 0.0 Total 8.2 1.1 0.2 0.0 8.5 1.1 7.4 Grand Total 1,472.4 1,032.8 123.3 95.3 1,595.9 1,128.1 467.8 Note: Totals may differ due to rounding. Source: MAC - provided INM Input Data, HNTB 2015. Average Daily Operations for 2007 forecast were obtained from the November 2004 Part 150 document. In general, many of the aircraft groups operating at MSP showed a reduction in the number of average daily operations from the 2007 forecast mitigated to the 2014 actual operations statistics. Manufactured or re- engined Stage 3 average daily operations in the 2014 actual statistics were down 5.9 percent from the 2007 forecast mitigated number. The Modified ( "hushkitted ") Stage 3 average daily operations in the 2014 actual statistics were down 99.9 percent from the 2007 forecast mitigated number. 43 In total, the 2014 actual average daily number of operations was 1,128.1, which is a 29.3 percent reduction from the 2007 forecast mitigated number of 1,595.9 operations. Nighttime operations decreased by 28 average daily operations from the 2007 forecast mitigated to the 2014 actual operations statistics. 3.1.3 Runway Use Comparison Table 3.3 provides a comparison of the 2007 forecast mitigated noise contour and the 2014 actual noise contour runway use percentages. Table 3.3 MINNEAPOLIS -ST, PAUL INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT Comparison of 2007 Forecast Mitigated and 2014 Actual Runway Use Day Night Total 2007 2014 2007 2014 2007 2014 Op Type Runway Fcst. Actual Fcst. Actual Fcst. Actual Arrivals 4 0.0% 0.0% 3.8% 0.1% 0.3% 0.0% 12L 21.8 % 19.6% 17.2 % 14.3% 21.4% 19.0% 12R 14.7% 19.7% 12.4% 26.7% 14.5% 20.4% 17 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0 % 0.0% 0.0% 22 0.5% 0.0% 2.4% 0.0% 0.6% 0.0% 30L 21.1% 19.0% 25.1% 35.5% 21.4% 20.6% 30R 25.1% 22,9% 26.4% 21.6% 25.2% 22.8% 35 16.9% 18.8% 12.7% 1.9% 16.5% 17.2% Total 100.0% 100.0 % 100.0% 100.0% 100;0% 100.0% Departures 4 0.2% 0.1% 0.4% 0.3 % 0.2% 0.1% 12L 8.9% 13.0% 14.1% 14.4% 9.3% 13.1% 12R 15.9% 4.9% 18.3% 28.3% 16.1% 6.6% 17 37.2% 24.0% 34.6% 15.8% 37.0% 23.4 % 22 0,1% 0.0% 0.8% 0.0% 0.1% 0.0% 30L 15.0% 33.2% 12.8% 27.8% 14.8% 32.8% 30R 22.7% 24.7% 19.2% 13.4 % 22.4% 23.9% 35 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0,0% Total 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% Overall 4 0.1% 0.1% 2.1% 0.2% 0.3% 0.1% 12L 15.3% 16.2% 15.6% 14.3% 15.4% 16.0% 12R 15.3% 12.2 % 15.3% 27.4% 15.3% 13.5% 17 18.6% 12.2% 17.1% 6.7% 18.5% 11.7% 22 0.3% 0.0% 1.6% 0.0% 0.4% 0.0% 30L 18.0% 26.2% 19.0% 32.2% 18.1% 26.7% 30R 23.9% 23.8% 22.8% 18.1% 23.8% 23.3% 35 8.4% 9.3% 6.4% 1.1% 8.3% 8.6% Total 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.06/0 Note: Runway use for 2007 forecast reflects Part 150 mitigated 2007 runway use. Totals may not add up to 100% due to rounding. Source: MAC- provided INM Input Data, HNTB 2015. Runway use for 2007 obtained from the November 2004 Part 150 document. was A general evaluation of the total runway use percentages in Table 3.3 indicates that use of Runway 17 and Runway 12R for departure operations in 2014 was well below the percentage use numbers forecasted in the 2007 mitigated scenario. The departure percentage on Runway 30L was notably higher than what was forecasted in the 2007 forecast mitigated scenario. The nighttime and overall departure percentages on Runway 17 were significantly lower, and the Runways 30L and 12R nighttime departure percentages were notably higher, than the levels forecasted in the 2007 forecast mitigated scenario. The nighttime arrival percentages on Runways 12R and 30L were notably higher, and significantly lower on Runway 35, than the levels forecasted in the 2007 forecast mitigated scenario. ., 3.1.4 Flight Track Considerations The INM departure flight track locations used to develop the 2014 actual noise contour were identical to those used for the 2013 actual noise contour. These flight tracks differ from those used to develop the 2007 forecast mitigated noise contour due to enhanced modeling methods and improved technologies. Sub - tracks were also added to each of the backbone tracks. The INM's standard distribution was used in distributing the flights to the sub-tracks. The same methodology as in previous annual reports was used to assign 2014 radar data with the INM flight tracks. The radar -to -INM flight track correlation process employs a best -fit analysis of the radar flight track data based on linear trends. This approach provides the ability to match each radar flight track directly to the appropriate INM track. 3.1.5 Atmospheric Conditions Comparison The MAC used an average annual temperature of 47.7 degrees Fahrenheit and an average annual wind speed of 5.3 knots in the 2007 forecast mitigated INM contour modeling process. The MAC also used an average annual pressure of 29.90 inches and an annual average relative humidity of 64 percent. As stated in Section 2.1.5, the 2014 actual noise contour used a 2014 annual average temperature of 43.6 degrees Fahrenheit and a 2014 average annual wind speed of 8.3 knots in the INM modeling process. In addition, a 2014 average annual pressure of 29.99 inches of Mercury and a 2014 annual average relative humidity of 66.65 percent were used. The INM was used to conduct a grid point analysis based on the 2007 forecast mitigated noise contour and 2014 actual noise contour INM input files. The MAC used INM Version 6.2a for the 2007 forecast mitigated noise contour grid point analysis because this was the oldest version of INM available to MAC staff to conduct the analysis in early 2008 when the annual noise contour report process began at MSP. When comparing the DNL values generated for the MACNOMS RMT locations with INM 6.1 in the November 2004 Part 150 Update document to the levels generated for those same locations with INM 6.2a, the differences were insignificant. The INM was used to calculate DNL values for the center points of each city block included in the mitigation programs outlined in the Consent Decree. Figures 3.1 to 3.5 depict the 2014 actual grid point analysis area and the DNL levels calculated for each block by city. Figures 3.6 to 3.10 depict the 2007 forecast mitigated grid point analysis area and the DNL levels calculated for each block by city. Figures 3.11 to 3.15 depict the difference in DNL levels, on a block -by -block basis, between the 2007 forecast mitigated noise contours and the 2014 actual noise contours. The 2014 actual noise contour is smaller than the 2007 forecast mitigated contour by 6,949.9 acres (44.2 percent reduction) in the 60 DNL contour and by 3,755.5 acres (51.9 percent reduction) in the 65 DNL contour. As depicted in Figure 3.16, there is a small area in South Minneapolis where the 2014 actual noise contours extend beyond the 2007 forecast mitigated noise contours. Chapter 4 provides an analysis of mitigation eligibility relative to the 2014 actual contour consistent with the requirements of the First Amendment to the Consent Decree. There is an overall decrease of 4,430 residential units in the 65 DNL contour and 2,567 residential units in the 60 to 64 DNL noise contours around MSP when comparing the 2007 forecast mitigated contour with the 2014 actual contour that was developed under the requirements of the Consent Decree. 45 The small extension of the 2014 actual noise contour beyond the 2007 forecast mitigated noise contour can largely be attributed to nighttime runway use variances between what was forecasted for 2007 and what occurred in 2014, particularly an increase of the nighttime arrival operations on Runway 12R. The predominant contraction in the contours from the 2007 forecast mitigated to the 2014 actual noise contour scenarios is driven largely by fleet mix changes (including a significant reduction in Modified ( "hushkitted ") Stage 3 aircraft operations), and a significant reduction of total annual operations, including a reduction of 28 average daily nighttime operations. The larger arrival lobe on Runway 12R is largely a function of higher nighttime arrival operations on that runway. In summary, in addition to INM modeling enhancements, the primary factors to consider when comparing the 2007 forecast mitigated noise contours to the 2014 actual noise contours are total operation numbers, fleet mix, nighttime operations, and runway use. ,. / 47 ■ _ ) 0 \ � � 7 � } o � \ / \ a \> § U 0 �\ / Ell a � ) 2 ) / \ i '•9S b Ss '- s if Its �'- L9S BS 6'BS 9 �II •�`r :" s .�," _ � .»f�_ -x �.3-'� � S9 6' C S 9 BS 9 l' l j r s e# 5 {q s '•€` tFi �FU U9 9 CS 9 '99 9 L L g'E9 8 L S9$ ; T"- i L'65 L "Z9 6'E L " "tom `: x 9tl'9 E9 59 ��it 2�s y rf,p °, .;,r 'o �I '`� j��``- •�s �'� jy a � .'. �z ; 3oe'� - 'x''' MkCS. F 959 5 £9 �F9 �'e .'zt': i °� 4 et• 'Xr` >'.. r i ids �Sraa TZ,�" K )�I - MGM ' CEO "Ieg � L E 8 8'85 E'L9 L'E9 .:. " "'� 6 8'E9 $✓ t �,�- r` 3� b bg � Z b9 8 • {" Sjf)9 • Z�S 9 4 2 9 E'09 L 9 9Z9 8'09 l9 l'Z9 5'b9 � ��i1599 C ey9lE9 9 b' 9 ©.6 5 ' S �' �¢ n r 9' 0 Z L L 'b9 l9 b'Z9 ES9 �� q;1E "59 'b9 E9 _ e -is l l B�S 585 N • Zy6S. big 4`t9 E,L409 L9 £'9s �3Q9i96 L'E9 L'E9 -,fib Z [0] Z'8S - [� E9 L Z9 Z9 E 9 B S S 9,�9S 6 _5y Z9 b l9 09 Z'09 5 9 ETb9 Z l9 9 [`E9 E6' 9 b Z9 j8A9 �E+09f x 5 Z 09 98 YEN: { 9L ` 5 LS ss b s os s� [EiBS sys] a ss ss Es Es e[1ze] z 9 — "i; rvx9II t9 0 S 5 6 L if E E9 6 Z L'Z (gjL €WN 91fS]Ea186]l P9 E09 Zy6S 65] lS'9 Ell MY S [s'yss]Eses�eos zos Ls9� Ls �ItCs L5 L 6 C`09 i�g•6g =sue �'r §4`e� L'09 S' i 89 86 S BS 8 6 b 6 in n 6 Sa y'Z91 E b9 m 6 BS 9 S L 65 J�Lj9S �- •w ' LS 6S 9 BS 69 L 95 09 L E9 b9 gLog 8S L 65 9 89 �r S 85 - • _ ' 8 b L 8S of � 9'E9 6 09 b 65 l 6S Z 6S�`y �� � S �• 5 85 b -BS 8`L'S N 9 0 bE9 0 85 8 BS,..El 6 g• ?.- S S 'I9 4 C S Bi85 L6S �? '09E 9 L69 g' g - .._.....�.:.t . (� x ,,@F BS isl EZy89 i+LS u1 O 89 8 8S S S^ 81 b ZB �' fD G 8S Z 8S S'89 m aZ S 8' g H fp N X09 S� ti8S ti89 M 6 a 95 t B w 8S Ok 8S 9' 9 if CJ to s, O t9 if- L9 ............. t`+ s ;P4 LJael t U 04 iL b l9 L9 609 -w:w.,f s w 9 L9 l L'85 }} 4��.� t�I � J L 9 ' l9 b 09 �e m Ei... : ... ... rf o (l 91, if I : I It PC 'tf, ru .M I. Zak � x� -I �� ���� &�'�. - cy ( a %• • '... IN ti - >.. 'l.. kit t• r � I Ir s. �# II 9169 s It NO `�""p oil Pl r5 I It, ; lilt, It Ilk 1 11 ...iIIIttit tit jit g� t C #.�2ter- €€' f .........:.: <: .. . ...... .......... C] .. ... ...... S q•+ . VI I� f 00 ro13 Ir LU ....... :. ..r ',b ...... .I ..._ .... ..............:::..... ...... 4 if x if 4 sz- N 1p U,, FES O b S S \�\ C 'L ' _� .... ......_ y L.: O (� ILIFXFA U 'N q T7 Ile 7 m ES 9 V M �/ 4t 6 v r �- W_ o- r— — - — Naa, it OR l WI Ii it IT Ij i � IL ilk 3; r s 1 .._�r �I { l i, 99 9 6s _ 9ii yA it ..4 i I C Via.. � • 3 1 � I � It IN YEW y`" i£ I ui lO 6665 m I Ll X4 4 & T �i- - r 77,� }� r 4 c <t T � �� 51 52 53 r., s . "., .., n 5 Mp113i9N01 x r 7 I. w, fr - in 1 b b N yf N N P Ng19NIWUU7a h ry k� n 6 G N i NlEI '^ e a Fu?1 rl Ii �Y r1 659 ?LE9� ',6' 7 .n F, •- .- ••..�i :� "� � Y ....NA01- •i• � � o In x � I It I N s� UNVINVU is ' . ..:: ;;•RC :: ........... j F u 1• U.0 JJ FINE S a V W -^nNG .,,. s W F {t{ s I � DLL Ail ! $ vI 71 C Y i z NIAI[)M:IN3M � Aana57 ➢d 3NV 31dr' R% g N X r G. in co 09 I; N n N ........ V U M 6 1. <: 9anUS+JnV 31VON41 y.. 5 9 41 _; Y - �p O �! �O %Ii '�^°" Z" "� 9A a9 IVIBUOV 9 s MR a o tV ss INVANp 5Y 4f M r` t+ A � � E Ir, ,I, -'l O I 4t 1' m �� NO5N3W3� ✓� j Qj ff 75...,. •-•-• 71aIVNIa If If q `"" _: • V d dl If if In 't 3NiDNS �iVj �' a.0 �,."�..,:�- tI 54 a MIMI W' WMI For V) ,mss III € r �jWIN� N. ,mot. SfSi 4, O: # x� n 9 ggyy 9 9t9 $ Edx�,. 0ov Z'4s eas WRS WAR G N m W M N, l ;': ss; dq: 1 �O . .....w: z. »" 9 LL ..... ..... __,_,.. ....... ._ xr 4J O ai ,� lJ !�T f' 731: d 011 55 56 z� o� C � O ,L NN 7 XO R 6• � U L 61 Ki a Sg 6)S9 � 6S p o Ss, ss, (V a E c CU to w o ai n .n v au 56 r :I j E C E ! ` - �,��1 ` Few IF nil LL c fA i O d.. I PPv I Fla t1 N + o N M E r i4 7 'A 1 '+4; Yi ` ❑m 1..- ............... ' IF i7 \� N �F © ii N N U c 0 J ° J WO W Lb rx .. y�L Y.�� Ill co Fly �_ ' t , m \i % f 1 Y �. : ". E ... jy. ��, .. € r ORR 'FIX, ill Ma- �� -!�,� \�. -•, N � ti's 1 `��- a � ���Y ''��� x t rr -x"G3 x h r a %•sr� IF s' a S � a p W l� v- 7 vixg Z >3 �: t C €i ti oil �` ", \� g z '�;, -f r FIF ae .. r.; ..... t } may- { ' G k 57 ^'T+vL cu oex ri £ ��'T "�Y"F.��S� • {� fad �3�. ��� r Uo ; m an O Q.. d, to `....{ '. ply ' ?• N G M N V C O IA. p0 R 0 �^ E � ttI r r p Lb BG I` 'U oi v., 4y Il •tom Wei- 1 R ........... sm beE• _ �� � z; Cb_l- Ez _ - y - z NNISM 8`Z !gal: aw ........_ .......:.:.... S�Z Sal rbiLO =z ll Eel z _ b 1 tE sz� giz z z ssi ke.z a �, a iE` b£ sip V ?Z igaV Z azcC�- NN E' Z]E.' E fi V °Z lZ 6Vya8aV 6V 8i 0 bZ N 'Z 6 °LZ b?z 6e99V 88i 1 cDN °p ¢' _ZYESZN - 96 1 - l 9 *Z4 a ` ..91 .: EMH tiL t �B�L -� � � � 0 8:01„�� �g Zy9' S V� Z Sr rt 9Ygl E•l�° , LhltEalx Lal 09, l A 1' :0 Gil = bsZ 9L rL %l 9x 9l, S0 l91 U ' iN I E3Zale z2 t,� l� $ y s. .v w _ �Y col a" l8I �Z"✓ <r Mama" 4A f sJ3 t� - y� R/ `'�^'s z. s i L £ } g"jX X Y'3 f tE -'� 11 Mi yv f _ _. _... ,.,. _,....... .µ µ ........ i .._. - h101 PN01 lad 1 _ .... It 1 N&11 Mn l £6 Z Rte t111 fi \�_1\ MEN l vfi 1 ,c 3 Z t_ —` Y.J29s± Etc- z z En�.. g N01- NIIN 0 �& 8 MLMMEW MM I HM - v. �h. jj HkIH �&6ki1£ v Ilp 1031 '.Cal. Eb �ill- K; ?- OOVOIH:y. "VINZ .. y.F x -rr .. _u.:.:..: ..::..:.... : :............:: ...: N ............ ........ ::::::::::... .�.. ....... ....::::..:::r:;.... ... ..........F x ��% 4 ..H H1,b ._ 9 .. r gN8A816 = £z9 z F= 5'Z E'z- g'Z I j ,OMIN BM 111 N Q) ,! ro p -9'z� G. ;p LL c � rm r- C N U M i� 191L1abH i.� p) it ua. _`^..,�1 0i9LYyyP U �S.'r .0 6 U � � E PIRM ��t' 1NVAa �. ro `-ft 3c .,1✓ IJ�l7 ����'i� ���� "�..€' ' s�e� _Y '� -.� c} s- ,�'�- %r""�a�f� s s '��� � G G.. lW 11 ell 59 Xs w i s bb 4 w r �) K:x x ..: .. ........ 4 IN C N C v W If WWI a JA cu Z 'E ,Qi ,7u' O N i it E o # v co ME it `3 fix.,, �.���,`.'�'�"�' ie•':� �3 �c,sx��e.���'���s.�'�,�w�k ��b ' 3 1 "�:�, `ate > . NJ xt tly INK s .t ......... ...... .... .1 J � \ f IL }+ %r a\ ,C: k % ° ® ] ) $ ( * 7 t = n L & ƒ \ a #= w \\m 4 k ® ƒ j § � ) �y� \ 61 °K ob ►�., C ... ....,.t«� i12iHMV�t:JFJw."'�.Q."'""" � �— ~ ''"._�, _ �`��y'�J�vlw:y &� -- =�....� la go Sir' to ' yam:- ffN � My 11 O it) a � m IMP O l U , 4 j f (, y sro �L r',p C:7_,i :::' 7 JEI1 f Za,� 1 if ; M Al. '. a � s� ► j 1 WOO j i f c \ Ram ........................ e .. .:..:CJNFll L2Jcl ::.....................::.. ._: i I if in if uPAN = l € if if All qd P5 \� O&P g- ......................_ -- ...... .. . it \�, 62 As discussed previously, the First Amendment to the Consent Decree requires the MAC to determine eligibility for noise mitigation on an annual basis using actual noise contours, developed under Section 8.1(d) of the Consent Decree. This chapter provides detailed information about noise mitigation impacts from the 2014 actual noise contour at MSP. On July 31, 2013, the Cities of Minneapolis, Richfield and Eagan, and the Minneapolis Public Housing Authority and the MAC jointly filed the First Amendment to the Consent Decree ( "Amendment ") to Hennepin County Court. The Amendment contains language that binds the MAC to provide noise mitigation services consistent with the noise mitigation terms described in the Final MSP 2020 Improvements. Environmental Assessment/Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EA/EAW). On September 25, 2013, Hennepin County Court Judge Ivy Bernardson approved the First Amendment to the 2007 Consent Decree. The Amendment incorporates text in the eligibility section and the related mitigation program as defined by the Consent Decree. In 2014 the Annual Noise Contour Report format was updated in consultation and agreement with the parties to the Consent Decree (including the Cities of Minneapolis, Richfield and Eagan) to address the mitigation program requirements detailed in the Amendment. In addition to the background information provided in Chapter 1, Section 1.51 the report was updated to provide maps analyzing changes that occur in noise mitigation eligibility as compared to the 2007 Consent Decree, and associated trends relative to consecutive yearly impacts. Under the provisions of the Amendment properties must meet certain criteria to be considered eligible for participation in the MAC noise mitigation program. First, as stated in the Amendment: "The community in which the home is located has adopted local land use controls and building performance standards applicable to the home for which mitigation is sought that prohibit new residential construction, unless the construction materials and practices are consistent with the local land use controls and heightened building performance standards for homes within the 60 DNL Contour within the community in which the home is located." This criterion has been met by all of the communities contiguous to MSP. L Second, as stated in the Amendment: "The home is located, for a period of three consecutive years, with the first of the three years beginning no later than calendar year 2020 (i) in the actual 60 -64 DNL noise contour prepared by the MAC under Section 8.1(d) of this Consent Decree and (ii) within a higher noise impact mitigation area when compared to the Single - Family home's status under the noise mitigation programs for Single- Family homes provided in Sections 5.1 through 5.3 of this Consent Decree or when compared to the Multi- Family home's status under the noise mitigation programs for Multi - Family homes provided in Section 5.4 of this Consent Decree. The noise contour boundary will be based on the block intersect methodology. The MAC will offer noise mitigation under Section IX of this Consent Decree to owners of eligible Single - Family homes and Multi- Family homes in the year following the MAC's determination that a Single- Family or Multi - Family home is eligible for noise mitigation under this Section." Table 4.1 provides the number of single- family living units that achieved the first year of mitigation eligibility and Table 4.2 provides the number of single - family living units that met the second consecutive year eligibility criteria. The colors in the tables relate to the colored blocks in Figures 4.1 and 4.2 Table 4.1 MINNEAPOLIS -ST, PAUL INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT Grand Total 41729 11850 1,031 - 72610 Note: Block Intersect Methodology; Single - Family =1-3 Units. Source: HNTB provided INM contours, MAC analysis, 2015 N Summary of 2014 Actual DNL Noise Contour Single - Family Unit Counts by Block with First Year Mitigation Eligibility Status Fig 4.1 Year of City Mitigation & 4.2 DNL Contours Eligibility Key 60 -62 63 -64 65 -69 70 -74 75+ Total Minneapolis In 2014 Actual Contours previously mitigated 41010 11538 1,029 61577 (N0 mitigation ellgibilit change _ I 2014,Actu� 60�D ' p�reV�o>�s yjo`C�s�'de 2005�� d 2007 60 D� ' ,„ y, 26 �6 M tlgati * Eli able for rr tt� ationafte"3,cottsecte ears �� a a�d• �'tt _. Chi g s; Ift20 4 Aetia160 DNi�re`zxosly betwee2005a�2007 60 DNt i-'f+` tf5 � v'� '..t' 4`Yi`'iti �, #�?r�"�T=r' ?r 4 ?'"f*��➢7-' i R4'S, "�'.k,�'i` r , , a U10 -t a a rrr333nsec e Means :. i l' b .{F SSilZ4 # �# ^dip' 4i �f- f£"`..'ae' t' J' In;. =2014 ctUalt63 D ,Lip ev�o sfy i 2 1 6062' "D L� .. � �a tt � =t�� , .4y.1. Year 1 ( El �g�bie�for7fhe >Yiue:,declbel;gacage_afer3 consecyt(.veY, out of 3 . .ars) Minneapolis Total 41175 11658 11029 61862 Bloomington In 2014 Actual Contours previously mitigated 8 1 9 9 No mitigation efi ibilit change) Richfield In 2014 Actual Contours previously mitigated 409 161 570 No mitigation eligibility change) Eagan In 2014 Actual Contours previously mitigated 135 31 166 No mitigation efi ibilit change) Mendota In 2014 Actual Contours previously mitigated Heights No mitigation eligibility change) 2 1 3 Grand Total 41729 11850 1,031 - 72610 Note: Block Intersect Methodology; Single - Family =1-3 Units. Source: HNTB provided INM contours, MAC analysis, 2015 N Table 4.2 MINNEAPOLIS -ST. PAUL INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT Summary of 2014 Actual DNL Noise Contour Single- I-am0y Unit counts ny t31ock with second consecutive Year Mitigation nugionity status Fig 4.1 Year of City Mitigation & 4.2 DNL Contours Eligibility Key 60 -62 63 -64 65 -69 70 -74 75+ Total Minneapolis In 2014 Actual Contours previously mitigated 41010 19538 19029 61577 (No mitigation eligibility change , . , Ac u i60 D L previous outside 2005 and 200760 DNL = h . �Ir2014 "�tr as - c'. # :: ` 18i Mttigation E6 rble for mill atton efter3:consecUtNe ears = � t __AW - ,s 4° .pr: Chang" "` s `'" 201'4{Aetua 60`DNL ` eG ot's�beiv✓'een''2005 and 2Q07 60 DNL' ` �� „frr ' >, erya y. J3, ,e�1aa,,,F >y tin'.. e =3' `�a` Eli blefor aiiitio at�mrtr aGon�less� revrous`rermbu s menu � � I f ?#Co�nsecuhve�aier 3 consecut/ve� {��� �� �•�_:�� � �����,�+�; t�r�� =°� .ears .�������� Years_ Ir201 {{//���}}ctua 63,[?1Lpre`ytouslm 2007 60 -(i2 DNL_ -, T' a.•t-:, tacflz. €e°3a'M3•r' �3s4aF`'' " f'. ,sue } =g3r #s: Fw. -- t aA•i3*y s 1$s'N'.1`tz?s }� ._ .5:�` i x �. ; (E6grble forahe EylJ�,decibej.package after,3rebnsecll i_ e�, e'a s �} z tF''9- Y.:..: `a�✓}� � a %�� _, �,�, _�f _ _� Year Minneapolis Total 41147 1,538 11029 - 61714 out of 3 Bloomington In 2014 Actual Contours previously mitigated 8 _ 1 _ g No mitigation eligibility change Richfield In 2014 Actual Contours previously mitigated 409 161 - 570 No mitigation eligibility change Eagan In 2014 Actual Contours previously mitigated 135 31 - 166 No mitigation eligibility change) Mendota In 2014 Actual Contours previously mitigated 2 1 3 Heights No mitigation eligibility change) Grand Total 4,701 11730 1,031 - 71462 Note: Block Intersect Methodology Single - Family =1 -3 Units. Source: HNTB provided INM contours, MAC analysis, 2015 Table 4.3 provides the number of multi- family living units that achieved the first year of mitigation eligibility and Table 4.4 provides the number of multi- family living units that met the second consecutive year eligibility criteria. The colors in the tables relate to the colored blocks in Figures 4.1 and 4.2 Table 4.3 MINNEAPOLIS -ST. PAUL INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT Summary of 2014 Actual DNL Noise Contour Multi - Family Unit Counts by Block with First Year Mitigation Eligibility Status Fig 4.1 Yearof City Mitigation &4.2 DNL Contours In 2014 Actual Contours previously Minneapolis mitigated under 2007 Consent Decree In 2014 Actual Contours previously Bloomington mitigated under 2007 Consent Decree In 2014 Actual Contours previously Year :1 out Richfield mitigated under 2007 Consent Decree of 3 /nn mf'finnfinn eifnihififv nhnnnnl In 2014 Actual Contours previously Eagan mitigated under 2007 Consent Decree Mendota In 2014 Actual Contours previously Heights mitigated under 2007 Consent Decree Note: Block Intersect Methodology Multi - Family >3 Units. Source: HNTB provided INM contours, MAC analysis, 2015 60 -64 65 -69 7044 75+ Total 669 164 833 457 - - 457 66 66 Grand Total 1,192 164 0 0 11356 65 Table 4.4 MINNEAPOLIS -ST, PAUL INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT Summary of 2014 Actual DNL Noise Contour Multi - Family Unit Counts by Block with Second Consecutive Year Mitigation Grand Total 11281 164 0 0 11445 Note: Block Intersect Methodology; Multi - Family >3 Units. Source: HNTB provided INM contours, MAC analysis, 2015 In this second year (2014) of actual noise contour Eligibility Status of the Amendment, the only residential properties that meet the mitigation eligibility criteria are located within the Fig 4 Minneapolis. Year of City Mitigation &4.2 2 DNL Contours Eligibility Key 60 -64 65.69 70 -74 75+ Total In 2014 Actual Contours previously mitigated Minneapolis under 2007 Consent Decree . ;1 669 164 833 no mitgation eU ibrht change IBM,, o� j, IB ,�.� �F It�20„ � c a1 =60 64 DNL�preyious y opts de x ,�t},� 13 o s cute 2005.a��0060tD L 89 89 ; C a E eigl 'e fo tigafro fter =3 onsecuf� e�year�s . z Minneapolis Total 758 164 - 922 In 2014 Actual Contours previously mitigated Year tout Bloomington under 2007 Consent Decree :. . -' : 457 - - 457 of 3 no mitigation eligibility change In 2014 Actual Contours previously mitigated Richfield under 2007 Consent Decree 66 - 66 no mitigation e N(y change) In 2014 Actual Contours previously mitigated Eagan under 2007 Consent Decree - no mitigation eligibility change) Mendota In 2014 Actual Contours previously mitigated Heights under 2007 Consent Decree - no mitigation eligibility change) Grand Total 11281 164 0 0 11445 Note: Block Intersect Methodology; Multi - Family >3 Units. Source: HNTB provided INM contours, MAC analysis, 2015 In this second year (2014) of actual noise contour mapping as established by the terms of the Amendment, the only residential properties that meet the mitigation eligibility criteria are located within the City of Minneapolis. There are 120 single - family units that meet the first year of eligibility within the 63 DNL contour for the 5 Decibel Reduction Package described in the Consent Decree, as amended. In addition, there are 39 single - family units that were previously eligible for the homeowner reimbursement noise mitigation program and another 126 single - family units previously outside of the program that meet the first year of eligibility in 2014 for the 60 -62 DNL noise contour noise mitigation package options described in the Consent Decree, as amended. There are 119 single- family units within the 2014 60 -62 DNL noise contour that were previously eligible for the homeowner reimbursement noise mitigation program and another 18 single - family units previously outside of the program that meet the second consecutive year of eligibility in 2014 for the 60 -62 DNL noise contour noise mitigation package options described in the Consent Decree, as amended. There are 89 multi - family living units within the 2014 60 -64 DNL noise contour that were previously outside the program that meet the second consecutive year of eligibility in 2014 for the Multi - Family Home Mitigation Package described in the Consent Decree, as amended. The blocks meeting the first and second consecutive year(s) of noise mitigation eligibility are shown in Figures 4.1 and 4.2 below. .. 67 ONA LU o m NA CD z ❑ \�`C` (,p 1` tOlilii3- O O j O N N 'D J -. Q{ In O (Np O O CO N 0 n .c E"�111�111V d a 7 >, N 0 0 L a 0 0 O ... U o 0 o cn U r S] 1 N N N oz O O _O _O a.0 .: AIRPORT RELATIONS COMMISSION 2014-2015 STAFF CONTACT: Dianne Miller, Assistant City Administrator Name Original Appointment Term Expires Curtis Aljets May 2005 April 2015 Steve Beseke May 2006 Aril 2015 Daniel Johnson May 2009 April 2015 Charles Thorkildson May 2009 Aril 2015 Jeff Spartz May 2014 Aril 2016 Carol Whisnant May 2008 Aril 2016 Scott Johnson May 2012 Aril 2016 Vacant 1 yr alternate Meetings: Second Tuesday of every other the month at 7:00 p.m. (odd months — January, March, May, July, September, and November)