01/06/1981 - City Council Regular AGENDA
EAGAN CITY COUNCIL
REGULAR MEETING
EAGAN, MINNESOTA
CITY HALL
JANUARY 6, 1981
6:30 P.M.
I. 6:30 - ROLL CALL AND PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
II. 6:33 - ADOPT AGENDA AND APPROVAL OF MINUTES
P III. 6:35 - OATH OF OFFICE/GENE VANOVERBEKE, CITY CLERK-TREASURER
IV. 6:40 - DEPARTMENT HEAD BUSINESS
Q•\ A. Fire Department Q \ C. Park Department
B. Police Department 2 D. Public Works Department
V. 6:55 - CONSENT ITEMS [One (1) Motion Approves All Items]
P.3 A. Contract 72-22, Johnny Cake Ridge Addition Utilities - Final
Payment/Acceptance
e.'.,B. Contract 79-17, Safari Estates Utiliiies-Final Payment/Acceptance
3 C. Contract 79-5, Vienna Woods Utilities-Final Payment/Acceptance
At D. Contract 79-7, Thomas Lake Trunk Storm Sewer Outlet-Crop Damage
Payment
E. Petition (Streets& Utilities) Joyce Addition
'1F. Change Order ##5, Contract 232A (Super America et al Utilities)
P.? G. Contract 232A, Final Payment
Q. $ H. Change Order ##1, Contract 80-15, Silver Bell Road Street Improvements
Q.$I. Change Order ##3, Contract 79-15, Vienna Woods Street Improvements
VI. 7:00 - PUBLIC HEARINGS
Q.'JA. Tax Exempt Financing (I.R. Note) for E. L. Murphy Trucking
Company in the Amount of $2,000,000; 3303 Terminal Drive
eq B. Tax Exempt Financing (I.R. Note) for J.P.K. Park Company in the
Amount of $2,800,000; S.E. area of Nicols Road (Cedar Avenue)
and Wildwood Lane (County Road 30)
VII. OLD BUSINESS
p. l1A. Paratransit Proposal - Grant Funding Consideration
VIII. NEW BUSINESS
�,.%I-A. McDonald's Corporation for Conditional Use Permits to (1) Allow
a Class II Restaurant with a Drive-Up Facility in a CSC (Community
Shopping Center) and (2) Pylon Sign; Located in the SWk, Section
30, Lot 1, Block 1, Mari Acres, Located NW of the Intersection
of Nicols Road (Cedar Avenue) and Cliff Road (County Road 32)
Q23 B. Maxi Audits for Public Buildings
.16C. Ches Mar East Fourth Addition Final Plat
Excavation Permit Application- Hillandale Addition
0 !
Eagan City Council Agenda
January 6, 1981
Page Two
IX. ADDITIONAL ITEMS
16A. 1981 Sewer/Water Rate Study Proposal
B JIB. Zoning Map Update/1981
�30 C. Dakota County Housing Assistance Update
P gbD. Amusement Device Licenses '
X. VISITORS TO BE HEARD (For those persons not on the Agenda)
XI. ADJOURNMENT
MEMO TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCILMEMBERS
FROM: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES
DATE: JANUARY 2, 1981
SUBJECT: AGENDA INFORMATION MEMO
After approval of the December 16, 1980, regular City Council
minutes and the agenda for the January 6, 1981 City Council meeting,
the following items are in order for consideration:
W672"VENSIM6 aim
OATH OF OFFICE/GENE VANOVERBEKE, CITY CLERK-TREASURER
It is necessary to handle one (1 ) organizational item at the January
6 , 1981 City Council meeting. The appointment of Mr. Gene VanOver-
beke as City Clerk-Treasurer is required. due to the necessity to
sign checks and other legal documents on behalf of the City of
Eagan. Mr. VanOverbeke has received the necessary bonds and all
other . requirements per personnel ordinance and state law have been
satisfied. The City Administrator will therefore administer the
oath of office as required.
FIRE DEPARTMENT
A. Fire Department -- Mayor Blomquist has asked that certificates
of recognition be presented to three ( 3) Fire Fighters who located
and saved the life of a one-year old, at the Eagan Green Apartments
on December 24, 1980. The Fire Fighters are Mark Adam, Dan Kling-
beil and Maynard Klang. A certificate is also being prepared for
Mr. Steve Olson, a resident in the building, who entered the burning
apartment to rescue two (2) of the children, however was unaware
that another child remained in the apartment until the Fire Fighters
arrived. Fire Chief Childers is also preparing some certificates
and will assist the Mayor in the presentation at the meeting on
Tuesday.
POLICE DEPARTMENT
B. Police Department -- There are no items to be considered for
the Police Department at this time.
PARK DEPARTMENT
C. Park Department -- The Director` of Parks and Recreation is
requesting authorization to proceed with specifications and the
advertisementfor bids to consider the purchase of a 'gang mower, '
weed sprayer, small utility vehicle and a three-quarter ton pickup.
The small utility vehicle would either be similar to a station
wagon or a log truck to be used for both administration and
• 0
Agenda Information Memo
January 2, 1981
Page Two
recreation field activities . These items have all been given consi-
deration for purchase as capital outlay in the 1981 budget .
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS MATTER: To approve or deny authori-
zation for the Director of Parks and Recreation to proceed with
the advertisement for bids for the equipment as stated.
PUBLIC WORKS 'DEPARTMENT
D. Public Works Department -- During 1980, the City has worked
coorperatively with the Metropolitan Transit Commission (MTC) to
provide a priority listing of designated sites to be considered
for future consideration of passenger waiting shelters . At the
January 15, 1980 City Council meeting, four sites were to be con-
sidered for future locations of passenger waiting shelters in the
following priority listing: (1 ) Valley View Apartments on Rahn
Road, ( 2 ) Wildwood Lane (County Road 30) at Rahn Road, (3 ) Easy
Street Apartments on Silver Bell Road, (4) Silver Bell Road- Inter-
section on Blackhawk Road. MTC plans to install forty shelters
in 1981 throughout the metropolitan ,area. They have received re-
quests for shelters from 41 cities. Consequently, the City of
Eagan will receive authorization for the installation of one ( 1 )
shelter only. However, the MTC has submitted site plans for review
and approval by the City for the first three ( 3) priority requests .
The reason the MTC is requesting site approval for several locations
from the City is to insure that, if the number one selection is
for some reason rejected, other potential sites will be readily
available to receive a shelter installation without running the
risk of being deleted from their 1981 program. Consequently, the
MTC has submitted site plans for Valley View Apartments (C-990) ,
Wildwood Lane/Rahn Road (C-976 ) , and Easy Street Apartments (C-
991 ) . The City has received a notice of objection from Mt . Calvery
Lutheran, Church pertaining to the proposed location of the shelter
- for the number one priority listing of Valley View Apartments (C-
990) . Based on subsequent information that the Director of Public
Works has received from the MTC pertaining to load counts and taking
into consideration the location of the apartment site and the
existing sidewalk facility, it is recommended that the MTC be re-
quested to consider locating the proposed waiting shelter on the
west side of Rahn Road for the Valley View Apartment location.
The City has not received an objection from any of the other pro-
perty owners affected by the proposed shleter locations .
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS MATTER: To approve site plan #
C-991 and # C-976 and to not approve site plan # C-990, dated 9
13-80, and to request the MTC to redesign and resubmit a shelter
station for the Valley View Apartments on the west side of Rahn
Road.
• 0
Agenda Information Memo
January 2, 1981
Page Three
•
There are nine (9) items on the agenda referred to as Consent Items
requiring one (1 ) motion by the City Council . If there is any
item which the City Council would like to discuss in further detail ,
that item should be removed from the Consent Agenda and placed
under Other Business unless the 'discussion required is brief.
CONTRACT 79-22
A. . Contract 79-22, Johnny Cake Ridge Addition Utilities for Final
Payment/Acceptance -- The City has received certification from
the Consulting Engineering firm that the above referenced , contract
has been completed according to City plans and specifications .
All inspections and tests have been performed and found acceptable.
The final construction amount was 2 . 71% under the contract amount.
This project has been assessed previously and the final pay request
has been taken into consideration during final assessment cost
tabulation,.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS MATTER: To authorize the ninth
and final payment to Encon Utilities in the amount of $5,000 for
Contract 79-22 (Johnny Cake Ridge Addition Utilities ) and accept
these utilities for perpetual maintenance.
CONTRACT 79-17
B. Contract 79-17, Safari Estates Utilities for Final Payment/
Acceptance -- The City has received verification from the Consulting
Engineering firm that the above referenced contract has been com-
pleted in accordance with the plans and specifications. All tests
and inspections have been performed and are found to be satisfactory
for final acceptance by the City. The final costs associated with
this project are 2.6% under the anticipated construction cost
based on contract award. This project has not yet been final
assessed.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS MATTER: To authorize the eighth
and final payment of $31 ,741 .90 to Austin P. Keller Construction
Company and -accept the utilities for perpetual maintance for Con-
tract 79-17.
CONTRACT 79-5
C. Contract 79-5, Vienna Woods Utilities for Final Payment/
Acceptance - The City has received written concurrence from the
Consulting Engineering firm that the above referenced project has
been completedaccording to plans and specifications approved by
the City. All inspections and tests have been performed and are
found to be satisfactory for final acceptance. The final construc-
tion costs associated with this project were 0.8% over the contract
award amount. This project has been assessed based on these final
construction costs.
Agenda .Information Memo
January 2 1981
Page Four
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS MATTER: To authorize the tenth
and final payment to Encon Utilities, Inc. , in the amount of
$11 ,623.96 and accept Contract 79-5 (Vienna Woods Utilties ) for
perpetual maintenance.
CONTRACT 79-7
D. Contract 79-7, Thomas Lake Trunk Storm Sewer Outlet, for Crop
Damage Payment During the construction ofthetrunk storm sewer
outlet for Thomas Lake to B,lackhawk Lake, the alignment adversely
affected -existing agricultural-used land. The =City has received
a claim from Mr. Leo Murphy for crop damage and loss incurred as
a result of this trunk storm sewer construction during the summer
of 1979 . Copies of this claim are made available for Council infor-
mation on pages S through (0 There are also pictures
available as provided y Mr. MurpiFy 'hat were not reproducible
but will be available at the City Council meeting if there is any
question on this agenda item. It has been standard City- policy
to authorize payment for crop damage as part of the easement nego-
tiation process'.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ' MATTER: To authorize payment to
Leo Murphy in the amount of $927.14 for crap damages during con-
struction of Contract 79-7.
/ 9 � o Cl-oy year
T—
C-
CP '1 1*1 �J �c tq t� 1� C 94 P.
7n,-/7,e-,j
t
cafes / 3�(� ipeie e, 7C6K ,4 la3d�. . � .3,3y 3yye�
Ad 04 7,-
..5 ®may x
r.tl / i /.ss - Z f 7.7o
a/fj S-e ed – •10 lbs.(9 # Fie�ej. �'/P//�f�f fecc�J' yo..d
G/ovC�- "pfo7NG �' .Tr'tfy ij'ofsery " AI. ,,,v
T�f //s e-g!
�. 2 r
,oA a t� t.ew rloK t S �•�i - e/.
Q/Sc : M� /yZ .�/•2.or ,b of�lf• /�a.
y Y�
Jf.►y a 3taF ���• J-� '' �...,
,Fe
Ne L trYlr�iY,/ /-`z •• •• •, /off GAO
'' f-etc,/.� � t 3 .. •- •• .3(e .oe
* toc3 IML % eo
wd �i•o .r
s s
see of
fc s ecd ; k� -la6�f-eq��
�►faxl fora /
z
z 1
Z , m ? ..
LO ¢pUJ Q3rO
0 0 Lu Cc Z
C Nz0 Q 1 0
zzwa :n - � o a
Q cc-iz a a
yux U O a W f N
= V c m C
V CC
W J = w ly �
m- >
LO �2
O }
z w IQ- O
v 0
V
a v a
N � U
W tD I Q
o Z ce z n E J
N LL L O LU Z N mU O
LU
Z O W O A>� c
Q .J Z 0 O U) D ¢ LL Q a V
N LiJ Za Q F- Z Q w n w
w W C1 a S j O u w Q
Ll. Z W y U O
a2 WU O
w UU
CL • N z< O Q w S ^
tL N J Z O 8 to z.
w, W LLQ
• O Z CD { s �y ..act! +o F
Z Q C Z .6:4
7c v) < > o
.. B
Q Q W y Q U ��(3 E -i,
Z 1 W N Q , Z i `;3t cI a=i iv 8^iS ��oMQ.2 p
Nle
= ~U N m o N pQQ ice:
a Q O O O a L3— aaa.p�• oc
W a V i U Z Q N 00 /n N CYY;La;$
p a �J c vl?Z- � °YSCo€o�
3 e acr-z'Z,c4
0001—
�I l/�
_ t
' `
^� M 0,F- p a
W N cv
U aN >
ccg
W QLn� V a m r
Im
'ZC� o v m c
NG a W W < � .., 1 W O =
U Q Z > - Q ,0 V- 3
73 UJ 10;
d Q^0 a S ` w � '. . O L L III
III N w CL -.._ ' 01 r N A
.-� r _. c O = N D
�- w x 7c
cr cc
e 61
W
O W Q
<
� z
Agenda Information Memo
January 2, 1981
Page Five
PETITION FOR JOYCE ADDITION
E. Petition (Streets & Utilities) , Joyce Addition -- The preli-
minary plat for "Joyce Addition" has been approved with the stipu-
lation that final plat approval not be considered until the trunk
storm sewer has been ordered for installation for T.H. 55 and Burr
Oak Pond 'outlet (182R and 319 respectively) . These projects were
approved at the November 18 meeting of the City Council. Sub-
sequently, the developer will be processing the final plat applica-
tion. " In conjunction with this, he has submitted a ;petition re-
questing the City to prepare a feasibility report for the installa-
tion of streets and utilities in this subdivision.. The developer
has guaranteed the cost of the report if the project is not ordered.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS MATTER: To receive the petition
for street and utilities in the Joyce Addition and authorize the
preparation of feasibility report #327 .
CHANGE ORDER #5 FOR CONTRACT 232A
F. Change Order #5, Contract 232A (Super . America Utilities) --
Change Order #5 consists of three ( 3) Barts: PART 1 consists of
the installation of storm sewer in Neil Armstrongggoulevard prior
to the street surfacing contract. Add $10,457. PART 2 consists
of additional water main wet taps and hydrant relocations required
by change in plat development. Add $33783. PART 3 consists of
additional gravel required by MnDOT for trench bac fill in the
area of T.H. 13 and County Road 30 frontage road. Add $2,601 .20.
All costs associated with this change order will be assessed the
benefited poject.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS MATTER: To approve Change Order
#5 , Contract 232A, in the amount of $16 ,841.20 to Encon Utilities.
CONTRACT 232A
G. Contract 232A, Super America, Cameron Addition, Sill Addition,
Neil Armstrong Boulevard and Carlson Lake -Lift Station, for Final
Payment/Acceptance - The City has received varification from the
Consulting Engineering firm that the above referenced contract
has been completed according to City plans and specifications .
All tests and inspections have been performed and are found to
be acceptable for final acceptance. The final' construction costs
exceeded the revised contract amount by 1.72%. The City discovered
that a double payment was processed previously under this contract.
Taking into consideration all final costs due the contractor, the
result is a net overpayment of $11 ,623.96 that was previously recom-
mended by the Consulting Engineering firm to Encon Utilities, Inc.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS MATTER: Authorize the eleventh
and final payment reflecting a reimbursement from Encon Utilities ,
Inc. , in the amount of $11 ,623 .96 and that the City accept the
projects under this contract for perpetual maintenance.
Agenda Information Memo
January 2, 1981
Page Six
CHANGE ORDER #1 CONTRACT 80-15
H. Change Order #1 for Contract 80-15 for Silver Bell Road Street
Improvements -- This change order provides for an extension of
the newly installed sidewalk from the Vogelpohl Apartments to T.H.
13. This project will be installed as a part of the municipal
stateaid' project for Silver Bell Road from Nicols Road to the
Vogelpohl Apartments and all costs will be paid by MSAS funding.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS MATTER: To approve Change Order
#1 to Contract 80-15 to Bituminous 'Roadways in the amount of
$14,871 . 50.
CHANGE ORDER #3 - CONTRACT 79-15
I. Change Order #3 for Contract 79-15 for Vienna Woods Street
Improvements -- This project provides for the adjustment to the
final grade of all City utility castings located within the Safari
Pass roadway which was constructed by MnDOT prior to final paving.
MnDOT` s contract did not provide for these adjustments and MnDOT
informed the City that it would be the City' s responsibility to
perform the work. The City made use of the contractor on MnDOT'.s
contract to adjust these utilities by way of a change order to
an existing City contract under jurisdiction of the same contractor.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS MATTER: To approve Change Order
#3 to Contract 79--15 to Minnesota Valley Surfacing in the amount
of $3,130.95.
I.R. NOTE
= E. L. MURPHY TRUCKING COMPANY
A. Tax Exempt Financing ` (I.R. Note) for E. L. Murphy Trucking
Company in the Amount of, $2,000,000 -- .The City has received an
application for a $2,000,000 industrial revenue note to finance
a' portion of the cost of constructing a two (2) story, 20. 550 square
foot office building and, a remodeling of the existing office
building. According to information supplied by Miller & Schroeder
Municipals , Inc. , it is estimated that approximately 50 new jobs
would be created at an annual estimated payroll of $750,000. All
of the information relative to consideration of the preliminary
resolution is enclosed without page number in a special folder.
E. L. Murphy has also provided a portfolio of their trucking company
that I feel the City Council will find of interest. Specific infor-
mation_ on how the actual industrial revenue note will be placed
will .be more available when the final resolution is considered
at a later date. - This specifically relates to the recent, question
of temporary financing vs . long term financing. Mr. Ernie Clark,
0
Agenda Information Memo
January 2, 1981
Page Seven '
the City' s Fiscal Consultant, has the financial information, and
upon completion of his analysis, the City will have a letter for
consideration by January 6, 1981 , as to the feasibility of giving
considerationto approval of the industrial revenue note.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS MATTER: To approve or deny a pre-
liminary resolution for an industrial revenue note for E. L. Murphy
Trucking Company in the amount of $2,000,000 for the purpose as
stated.
I.R. NOTE - J.P.K. PARK COMPANY
B. Tax Exempt Financing (I.R. Note) for J.P.K. Park Company in
theAmount of $2,800,000 A public hearing is scheduled to, consi-
der an industrial revenue note for J.P.K. Park Company for the
purpose of constructing a 67,000 square foot shopping center.
The shopping center will include a 25 ,000 :square foot supermarket
with the balance of space leased to retail shops. The estimated
-
payroll is $1 ,150,000, based on an estimated 115 new jobs. Infor-
mation relative to this tax exempt financing request is found .in
the attached document prepared by Miller and Schroeder Municipals ,
Inc. , (no page numbers are given) . This tax exempt financing re-
quest is for approval of a preliminary resolution and, therefore,
the details regarding the placement of the mortgage note will be
considered - in - the future when the final resolution is presented
to the City. A request for a $2,500,000 industrial revenue note
was considered by the City Council at the February 19, 1980 City
Council meeting for construction of a 67,000 square foot shopping
center proposed by J.P.K. Park' Company. This tax exempt mortgage
request was not approved as a result of a motion for reasons offered
in the minutes, a copy- of which is enclosed on page /0 for your
reference. All the information for this tax exempts nancing re-
quest is in order for consideration. . ' Again, as stated, a copy
of the document regarding public purpose and other 'support informa-
tion is enclosed for your reference. If there is any , additional
information required by the City Council , please feel free to con
tact this office prior to the meeting on Tuesday.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS MATTER: To approve or deny the
I .R. not in the amount of $2,800,000 for J.P.K. Park Company for
the 'public purpose as stated.
i
i
City Council Minutes
February 19, 1980
Page Three
Wachter moved to approve the bond issue on the basis of the need for
an office building in the area. There was no second and the motion died. Mr. Nick
Hay, attorney from Head and Truhn, Minneapolis, appeared for the applicant and re-
quested a continuance to further review the application and submit additional data.
Egan moved and Wachter seconded the motion to continue the hearing until the regular
meeting of March 18, 1980, at 7:00 p.m. at City Hall in order to acquire further
information. All voted in favor.
SEE BOND FILE
JPK PARK COMPANY IDR BONDS - NICOLS STATION
The next public hearing convened by Mayor Blomquist concerned the appli-
cation of JPK Park Company for industrial revenue bonds in the amount of $2,500,000
for a 67,000 square foot shopping center at the intersection of Wildwood Lane and
Nicols Road. Mr. Mark Parranto indicated a conflict and withdrew from consideration
and reviewed the proposal for the applicants. Finance Committee Chairman Smith
discussed the committee's findings and recommended approval after citing reasons
given by the Finance Committee for approval including the following: Miller &
Schroeder had reviewed the application and stated that it was economically feasible,
that the lease rental proposals appeared to be economically practical , that it would
improve the area in relation to its present condition, and that there would be only
one project instead of several scattered commercial buildings. There was discussion
by Councilmember Smith concerning the Metram Project, called Silver Bell Center,
and the denial by the Council to issue industrial revenue bonds. Mr. Smith noted
that no recommendation had been made by the Finance Committee at that time. Issues
were also discussed concerning compatibility with the overall development plans
and objectives of the City, employment potential, etc. There were concerns about
using industrial revenue bonds for competition with other commercial development
in the area but there were no objections from members of the audience. Smith moved
to authorize the $2.5 million industrial revenue bond issue as requested subject
to normal City and other applicable rules and regulations. Egan seconded the motiDn.
Mayor Blomquist expressed her concerns including the fact that there is a considerable
amount of vacant commercial space in the general area and that the Council had already
denied IDR bonding for Silver Bell Center. Those in favor were Smith and Egan,
those opposed were Blomquist and Wachter and the motion died.
SEE BOND FILE
IMPROVEMENT PROJECT #300 - JAMES REFRIGERATION
The Mayor convened the public hearing regarding Improvement Project
#300 consisting of the Janes Refrigeration neighborhood business site at the north-
east corner of Pilot Knob Road on Wildwood Lane. Mr. Rosene explained the utility
project and a representative of James Refrigeration and Dunn& Curry was present
and favored the project. He indicated that Dunn & Curry may request that the storm #
sewer running easterly may be rerouted in the future but that it would be done at
the developer's expense. There was discussion concerning the need for the easement
and the recording with the County Recorder. There were no objections to the project.
Wachter moved and Smith seconded the motion to close the hearing, to approve the
project, and to authorize the City Engineer to prepare the plans and specifications
subject to the acquisition of the necessary easements with the understanding that
in the event that the developer should request that the storm sewer be moved that
all costs would be covered by the owner upon approval by the City. All voted in
favor.
10
r1 ADDENDUM TO DEVELOPMENT ACRRFMENT
/ /6
This addendum to the agreement dated , 1979,
between B & K Properties Co. , a partnership and the City of Eagan;
WHEREAS, the parties entered into a Development Contract dated
, 1979, covering Vienna Woods, City of Eagan, Dakota
County, Minnesota; and
WHEREAS, the parties desire to amend said Development Contract relating
to assessment against the land within Vienna Woods;
NOW THEREFORE, the parties agree as follows:
1. All lots on the North side of Kings Road in Vienna Woods including
Lots 26 through 32, Block 2, and the land owned by Richard Kreitz will be
assessed on a front foot basis for street improvements for that portion of
the North side of Kings Road including curb and gutter at a residential
equivalent rate and in addition, sanitary sewer, water and storm sewer laterals.
The normal City policy will apply for storm sewer and water trunk assessments
on said lots.
2. All other lots in the subdivision will be assessed on an equal per
lot basis for improvements installed by the City of Eagan except that Lots 9,
10, and 11, Block 2 will not be assessed for street improvements and such street
improvements will be assessed against all lots currently owned by B & K Properties
Company.
3. Lots 9, 10, and 11, and Lots 26 through 32, Block 2, and the land owned
by Richard Kreitz will each be assessed 1/106th of the street improvements for
that portion of the South one-half of Kings Road from the West line of Vienna
Woods to the East line of the Kreitz Property.
WITNESSETH, our hands and seals on the date above written.
CITY OF EAGAN
Attest:_-_��
Its City Clerk. ze
' /.I Mayor.
LINK PROPERTIES w, a y�, B & K PROPERTIES, CU.
Its ' `i—U By:
It
And:
And:
Its
Its
G
Agenda Information Memo
January 2, 1981
Page Eight
PARATRANSIT PROPOSAL
A. Paratransit Proposal for Grant Funding Consideration -- At
a recent joint meeting of several cities in Dakota County and the
City of Savage in Scott County, it was decided that additional
planning concerning the feasibility of a paratransit system for
this region of the metropolitan area would be considered only if
a grant application were approved by the U.S. Urban Mass Trans -
portation Administration for funds to complete a market analysis
and a feasibility study for such a paratransit system. A resolution
has been approved by the City of Burnsville and is under' considera-
tion bytheCities of Apple Valley, Lakeville, Savage and Rosemount
to make a grant application to the Urban Mass Transportation Admini-
stration for planning funds for the continued development of- a
paratransit system to operate in this region of the metropolitan
area. The ' resolution to be considered by the City Council is as
follows :
Whereas, the Cities of Apple Valley, Burnsville, Eagan,
Lakeville, RosemountandSavage recognize the important role trans-
portation plays in _promoting a diversity, development and opportuni-
ties for employment, retail , cultural , .recreation, etc. ; and
Whereas,, paratransit systems are currently being explored
by a joint committee representing these communities as means to
provide energy efficient transportation and help insure the via-
bility of .this suburban area and
Whereas, this joint committee' s research has indicated
that a more in depth study of the. area' s transportation needs is
necessary to assess the feasibility of -a paratransit system serving
northwest Dakota County and Savage; and -
Whereas, the Urban Mass Transportation Administration
(UMTA) has funds available for market analysis, project design
and paratransit planning.
Now, therefore; be it 'resolved that the City of Eagan,
together . with Apple Valley, Burnsville, Lakeville, Rosemount and
Savage, work with the Twin Cities Area Metropolitan Council in
submitting a grant application to the U.S. Urban Mass .Transportation
Administration for funds to complete a market analysis and feasi-
bility study for a paratransit system serving these communities.
A representative of the Metropolitan Council will be present to:
answer any questions regarding further intentions of the market
analysis and 'feasibility study. It has been . the understanding
of the City Council that no funding would bespentby the City .
of Eagan; however, the feasibility of a paratransit system could
•
Agenda Information Memo
January 2, 1981
Page Nine
be analyzed in detail. To date, ,a special study committee made
up of appointed citizens from all the communities has met, and
in a recent meeting attended by' local officials at the City of
Eagan, it was the decision of all cities that the further develop-
ment of a paratransit system be studied in greater detail through
the completion of a market analysis and feasibilitystudy if grant
funding is approved by UMTA.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS MATTER: To approve or deny the
resolution as 'stated as it relates to `the feasibility report for
a para transit system to serve the City of Eagan as well as neigh-
boring communities.
MCDONALDS CORPORATION
A. McDonald' s Corporation for Conditional UsePermitsto (1`) Allow
a Class II Restaurant with a Drive-Up Facility in a CSC and (2)
Pylon Sign - Two (2) applications were received from the McDonald's
Corporation for consideration of a drive up restaurant on Lot 1 ,
Block 1 , Mari Acres. The first application submitted was -a request
for a conditional use permit to allow a class `II restaurant with
a drive up facility in a community shopping center district. The
second application submitted is a request for a conditional use
permit for a pylon sign for the McDonald' s Restaurant. A public
hearing was first scheduled for the Advisory Planning Commission
at the November 25, 1980 meeting; however, the hearing was continued
by the City Planner due to insufficient information provided by
the McDonald' s Corporation. Therefore, the public hearing was
rescheduled and the application was considered at the December
23, 1980 APC meeting. The APC is recommending approval of both
conditional use permits to the City Council. For additional infor-
mation on the matter, please refer to the City Planner' s report,
a copy of which is enclosed on pages !�73 through Zv ., . For
action that was taken by the APC, please:reTer to ' thos`e m nutes ,
a copy of which is enclosed on pages through ZZ for your
reference.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS MATTER: To approve or deny the
recommendation of the APC, to approve the two (2) conditional use
permits as stated.
CITY OF EACAN
SUBJECT: T'+'C COiiDI:IOiir_� USE PER,TI S
APPLICANT: 1.1cDONALD'S CORrOF_^TIO^1
LOCATION: LOT 1, BLOCK 1, MARI ACRES
EXISTING ZONING: CSC (CC?.^.`UJITY SuOPPI:dG CE" - DISTRICT)
DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: DEC:JBER 23, 1950
DATE OF REPORT: DECD SER 16, 1950
REPORTED BY: DALE C. RU iKLE, CITY PLANNER
Aper KATION SU31;1IT7ED
The first appiicati.n submitted is a request for a conditional use nermit to a.11cw
a Class II resta,.irant wi h a drive-up faci_ity in a CSC (Cr,-=unity Shoppi_g Center
District) located on Lot 1, Block 1, Mari Acres, Section 30.
The second application submitted is a request for a conditional use permit for a
pylon sign for P:ScDonald's Restaurant located on Lot 1, Block 1, Mari Acres, Section
30.
C! :1�1.T
the beginning �f 1950, 11cDonald'S Corporation submitted an a- t•
At � _.. �P11Ca melon for 3
McDonald's Resta---ant located cn Lot 1, Block 1, Mari Ares. At that time, the
Advis^ry Planning Corjnission tabled the application until Hill-crest Develor!Tient
Comnan:.r sub-.fitted an overall plan for the Community Shopping Center Distrlct and
began - ruction of the first phase of development :r'nich contains 20,0,C-` squa^e
feet. ,;i thin the past two months, _.Illcrest Development Com.,zany has sub-1t-1 an
overall plan for the Shopping Center District and has designated a 20,600 square
foot office building, to be the first phase of the development. Hillcrest Devel07_ -
ment Corporation has applied for a btuilding permit for the ccnstrurtion of this
office building and the permit will be issued as soon as the final plat has been
recorded with the County. Therefore, all the conditions set forth at the 'prior
Planning Commission meeting have been co-Diied with, so ,.!cDcnald's Corporation can
corainue :-;ith their request for the two conditional use Permit,
SITE PLA^i
Lot 1, Block 1, Mari Acres, contains approximately 53,900 square feet, or 1.2 acres.
^he proposed building contains approximate"v 3,500 square feet for approximately a
6.5`7 lot coverage.
The -efts all setback requirements in Ordinance 52.
the a^,:_cant will recuire a 15-foot variance from the parking setback requirement
on the ::est street. As ycu recall, the office building .-;h,-c:, Hi lcrest Development
Corporation received approval on also had a 15-foot variance granted to that site
13
CIT ^F EA('1'.'d
�n
?dcDO'�rt .D'S COP.F�r.ATI�_:;:
DEC'':'.-'.ER 23, 1980
PAGE T"70
which is directly on the :est side of this same street.
McDonald's Restaurant is proposing a drive-through facility which is located on the
east side of the building. According to 11,cDonald's, approximately 30-350 of their
business is conducted at the drive-through facility. The site plan also has a cir-
culation pattern which allow:- cars to circle through the east side of the building
and continue straight out to the looped street. Therefore, this circulation would
not ,mix in with the cars that will be cordng in to park to go into the facility.
Also on the east side Df the facility there are nine parallel parking sr�aces. I+
is t .e staff's unders a_:ding that these parallel parking spaces will be used for
employee parking.
The site plan contains 64 parkins spaces, which appears to be adeq•..ate for the site.
Ordinance 52 states that the number of parking spaces shall be determined by the
City Council. checking the parking spaces against a sitdown restaurant, the
requirement is one parkinssp-ace for each three seats based on the capacity design.
The parking spaces provided are in excess of this amount.
The parking spaces are a 10 x 20 foot design_ which does meet the Eagan parking
space reeuirement.
The entrances to the proposed restaurant sh,culd have a 15-foot radius ,urve
stead of 10-foot radius curve which is proposed.
SIGN
The sec^nd conditional use permit is a request for a pylon sign which is 1^?ated in
the sou'heast corner of the facility. The proposed sign contains approximately 100
square feet of signage. As proposed, the pylon sign would be 34 feet in heisht.
Ord_^an:,e 16 requires t:-,e maximum heisht of a pylon sign be 27 feet in height.
The '.!c-Donald's sign 1^cation is :more than 300 feet from the overall sign plan
Hillcrest Development- Corporation submitted. Therefore, the sign does meet the
spacing requirements.
NOTE: Presently the City Council has been tabling all pylon signs until such +-17e
that the sign committee, which the Council has jus- appointed, review Ordinance 16
(sign ordinance ). Therefore, you may want to take the conditionnl use permi- for
the pylon si:-n under advisement at this time.
If appr)ved, the conditional use permits should be subject to the following conditions:
1. The proposed building permit should not be is--,led to "1cDonald's until such. tine
that Hillcrest Develo-.ment Corporation: has received their building permit.
2. The parking ;reg: shall have asphalt surfacing and concrete curbing around all
perimeters of t_,e parking. and drive-through area.
3. The 15-foot variance would have to be approved for this proposed site plan.
CITY CF FAGA'1
Mc,DO".Ai.D S CSR CPQ.LL,N
DECF...IE=R 23, 1980
PAGE TWO
4. A $2,000 landscape bond shall be submitted and not released until one year
after the landscaping has been completed.
5. The pylon sign shall contain no more than 125 square feet of signage and shall
be no more than 27 feet in height.
6. The architectural design shall be compatible to the overall center.
DCR/*nc
I t:
Pbd�t3i F
R u.P)N
i
it s
p
• I ix r rr
93.00,
QQQQQ I� �
uA ,
g x+
"1. I
n
t-s
ro vAm as le 4 &aev s N rK
co rn14�
�► co
04
irp
IQ
Ok
r$ oIJ
.. ' � • H
/ _ _ A _.tee _ _�1 _ _ ♦ l
t wP
�• r
Ile, t
P�
i.
I ~ t
:�..r .�..i::?_lr.'�SC....�.7��s;.a".'a:'W;:aA71:7/!�`i•;:►"J�''..'3ri?fc?:"�: '� kti
i'
a� � I � ► li�l _ Na4
I � m
1 ! ' A 6P
i 1► 1 o a j
a
03
- v! 1I1f�71II JK / F
Iom
S� `` •i I
- , i• L-- I
Ft
9,oa
7
IM
1� 'till /. pu ao ! al ►� .
-,v li�A p�
. I, bty NF NF
j. 1 G=•�1 oy p I '
I � I
1
l
I
�'i:��{til•��1 "�'.'.'r ••' YY J� ,I�AII..a..,`�'r�y4.�a Y,• � . .� . .. . .n ,
1 1
lLi^.t.MW•M.�•4tA..�MrCK1/,�1A�:1'lill\:A�trrw�w7c�w��.��vsw,nc���:e7w�raww�...wwrt�...owa..w..�s��.+.r.++�..+.....,...�... '.�.
'k4l�iM°L'Si•. 1�'.:z..�`.7�1iSir:+ .eI'i.Za.d'�i c., " —••.. .M •...:eY• �: .•� .►�� s• .....5'`.�"':«�.'Q'Y^::ii�i�.:^I-..'�iC:F�':�'C.t'-!:.:.:
,,.�T . rv• ?��:rf.31�^£i..1�:.c.tF"f�'.••S•.S1•� i...•=.11i �;ii►s. :.f'►=�L'�+.. .L'..r'.. �-
+•`. 'U � I moi`•
!; I
I
,t
•� aeg I: � � � I � r 1 � I �
'
40. It
i 1 h
lqg
I
M ^
I! r
1; I
� .•..;{� + `•� y, :+. :,�.;1.-r a.;w+•,'�'t,•.���... t�yw.is-�,." s.•, - ..,.. ;a Vic,• t• _. t' a •�. .,
v.,...a:.a.....� ....... f ..W..i..r..lr.s... �. .••��s•. 1•.. .I ., ...�..... ...,...•ar...-s.. ........ w�e.�.... ... ........... -a..' ....•. •.n. •... ..�.... ..__.._._.,.'.
mc) > cn
m m m
o CD z
> p
C � �
moo
. x o
S o j.
_
CD n
G o
� y
G W D r
W o
D D ...
1
U
a
CL
cr —
•c o
d •
C G
r I14'-0"
5'-2•
J
1 O
1
oo �I � '
N
fi c '
! ® O
Q
t � '
i p
/NNW
ml
on
we
� ,
ZA—
LJ
.C: -I, - -M5�—f . . . . . .. .ti
CIE
Ln
• I 1 )_' 1 - 1 j 1.
�:�r'•,:•/ :� I 1{� li'll Ij '.i+ I �^�`h���� 1 L! _ + ` +i i+ I'j�l {� I,1ii
.,V/. �' 1 ,j� � +..If��II` ',+� +•�."�' 7J:"s, .. I� "j�� I{� �11' i�i.l+�.:
���
— - — -
\
RIVE R
TEST
ENTER i
� 111 �` � i SIGNANT .���� �--+) �•'
m P
SLAT
AC
'' � !/, 1 -- -Jam/ �' J•
SUBJECT TO APPROVAL
MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE EAGAN ADVISORY PLANNING CO`L�IISSION
EAGAN, MINNESOTA
DECEMBER 23, 1980
A regular meeting of the Eagan Advisory Planning Commission was held on Tuesday,
December 23, 1980, at 7:00 p.m. at the Eagan City Hall. Those present included
Chairman Joseph Harrison and Planning Commission Members Turnham, Wilkins, Bohne,
Krob and Gits. Absent was member Hall. Also present were City Planner Dale Runkle,
Assistant Planner Steve Mielka, City Engineer Rosene and City Attorney Hauge.
MINUTES
Gits moved, Wilkins seconded the motion, to approve the minutes as distributed.
All voted yes.
McDONALDS CORPORATION CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
Chairman Harrison convened the public hearing regarding the application of
McDonalds Corporation for conditional use permit to allow a Class II restaurant with
drive up facility in a Community Shopping Center district located on Lot 1, Block 1,
Mari Acres and application for conditional use permit for pylon sign at that location.
Mr. Mike Asad appeared for the applicant. There were numerous questions but no
objections to the application. The proposal would include a drive through and would
require a 15-foot variance from parking setback requirement on the west side.
Hillcrest Development had received approval of a 15-foot variance on the west side
of its property along the same street. There were concerns about the amoun t of
parking but it was noted that it was a fast food restaurant and the developer indi-
cated that there is sufficient parking for its purposes. The Planning Commission
members noted that the Council may table the application for sign permit because the
Sign Committee is studying signs along freeways and also noted that the 34 foot height
request would not comply with the Eagan ordinance. Also, Mr. Asad indicated that
the radius curves would be corrected. It was noted that there were platted roads on
two sides so that a hardship is created if the 15-foot variance is not granted. The
plan is to start construction in the spring and open by mid-summer. There were
concerns about compatibility with other buildings in Hillcrest Center and Mr. Asad
said that the exterior would be compatible.
Gits moved, Krob seconded the motion to recommend approval of the conditional
use permit to allow a Class II restaurant with drive up facility subject to the
following conditions:
1. The proposed building permit shall not be issued to McDonald's until such
time that Hillcrest Development Corporation has received their building permit.
2. The parking area shall have asphalt surfacing and concrete curbing around
all perimeters of the parking and drive-through area.
3. The 15-foot variance shall be approved for this proposed site plan.
APC Minutes
December 23, 1980
Page Two
4. A $2,000 landscape bond shall be submitted and not released until one year
after the landscaping has been completed.
5. The architectural design shall be compatible to the overall center.
6. Compliance with all other applicable ordinances.
7. The entrances to the proposed restaurant should have a 15-foot radius curve
instead of 10-foot radius curve as proposed.
All members voted in favor.
Then Gits moved, Krob seconded a motion, to approve the application for pylon
sign subject to:
1. The pylon sign shall contain no more than 125 square feet of signage and
shall be no more than 27 feet in height.
2. Compliance with applicable ordinances.
All voted yes.
MUSICAL EATERIES, INC. -- CISCO'S
City Planner Runkle indicated that the abstract covering property owners in
the vicinity of the proposed Cisco's Restaurant in Cedarvale Center had not been
submitted in time to hear the application at the December meeting and that it would
be carried over and heard at the January Planning Commission meeting.
PEACE REFORMED CHURCH -- REZONING
A public hearing was commenced regarding the application of Peace Reformed Church
to rezone approximately 12.5 acres from R-4 to LB, Limited Business, located in the
east one-half of the northwest corner of Section 30 south of County Road #30 between
old and new Cedar Avenues. A representative of the church was present and indicated
that it is intended that the church would be located on the south portion of the
property and possibly a school or retirement home would be located on the balance of
the property. The representative indicated that it is not expected that the property
would be used for commercial type use such as office building, and the Planning
Commission Members recommended the zoning be Public Facilities rather than Limited
Business. It was estimated that the construction of the church would begin within
two years. Richard Kennealy, the property owner to the north zoned Roadside Business
District property was concerned about the 300-foot spacing between a proposed liquor
license restaurant on his property and the proposed church. The representative
indicated there could be at least 300 feet because it was suggested that the church
be located on the south end of the 12.5 acre parcel. The Planning Commission con-
tinued the matter until later in the meeting to permit the representative to discuss
the issues with other church Board members.
2`�..
•
Agenda Information Memo
January 2 1981
Page Ten
MAXI SUDITS FOR PUBLIC BUILDINGS
B. Maxi Audits for Public Buildings -- The City has participated
in a state and federal funding program for mini audits which were
conducted by Holstad Associates this past year. The mini audits
provided the City with a list of energy deficiencies in each of
its ' public buildings. The next step , in the process is the maxi
auditgrants which are also .partially funded by state and federal
government agencies. The benefits of the maxi audit include iden-
tification of projects that would ` make the buildings more energy
efficient, including an engineering, analysis to determine the pro-
ject ' s' cost effectiveness . Supposedly when the maxi audit process
is completed, the City will be able to implement measures to enhance
conservation of energy throughout all of its public buildings .
The Administrative Intern, Mr. Steve Mielke, has prepared a memoran-
dum which addresses the maxi audit bids , three ( 3 ) were received
for completion of the program. It is the recommendation of the
City Administrator that the ' City proceed with the entire maxi audit
which would be a cost to the City of $660, assuming the low bid
of Holstad 'Associates. A total of $3,309 will be assumed state
and federal agencies if the grant is approved. By participating ,
in a `maxi audit program, good faith is demonstrated by the City
for future grants or programs that might attach some energy criteria.
The memo is enclosed for your information on pages through
25
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS MATTER: To approve or deny partici-
pation in the maxi `audit program as ,presented.
MEMO TO: City Adminstrator Hedges
FROM: Administrative Intern Mielke
DATE : December 26 , 1980
SUBJECT: Maxi Audit Bids
This memo is in reference to the taking of bids by the city concer-
ning the Technical Assistance for buildings owned by units of local
government and Public Care Facilities Cycle II , (Maxi Audit) .
Attached find letters from the three (3) bidders.
As was mentioned in my previous memo, Eagan has a number of alter-
natives in the way of courses of action. These alternatives are:
1. No action - discontinue program
2. Partially discontinue program
3. To fully complete the program
The taking of bids was done so as to get an idea of the cost to the
City should it decide to continue program.
Bidding is now complete and bids have been recieved.
The three (3) bidders are:
1. Holstad Associates (Holstad Assoc. )
2. Environmental Engineers Inc. ( Env. Eng. Inc. )
0
3. Koehnlei_n, Lightowler, Johnson Inc. (K.L.J. Inc. )
The followingis a breakdown of the bids received for fire halls #1
and 2. As you will recall these two (2) buildings were accepted by
both the Federal Government and State Government for funding. This
is a 50o Federal funding and 50% State funding as submitted in the
application.
Firehall' s #1 and 2
NAME OF BUILDER FUNDING SOURCE
Federal State Local Total
Holstad Assoc. 434 . 00 435. 00 ----- 869. 00
Env. Eng. Inc. 434.00 435.00 1. 24 870 . 24
K.L.J. (No Bid) ------
Should the City decide to only partially continue the project, I would
recommend awarding the bid to Holstad Associates due to their being
the low bidder.
The following is a representation of the bids for performing a maxi
audit on all 5 buildings included within the grant application. Again
the bids are in order of lowest to highest cost to the City.
i
Firehalls #1 and 2 , City Hall, Public Works Garage and Police Dept.
NAME OF BIDDER: FUNDING SOURCE
Federal State Local Total
Holstad Assoc. 434 . 00 2 ,875.20 660. 00 3 ,969. 20 I
Env. Eng. Inc. 434. 00 2, 875. 20 690. 80 4 ,000. 00
K.L.J. 434. 00 2 ,875. 20 690. 80 4 ,000 . 00+ (2)
Should the City decide to complete maxi audits on all buildings , I
would recommend Holstad Associates due to the fact of being the low
bidder.
(1) State funding is broke down into two forms :
A. $435. 00 towards 50% funding of the two fire halls.
B. $2 ,440. 20 towards 70% funding of the other 3 buildings.
As I mentioned in my previous memo the prospects of cycle 3 being
implemented is doubtful. However the costs to the City are less than
anticipated to find out what conservation measures can be taken.
If the City was to implement these changes the costs could be made
up in saved energy bills.
If more information is needed or if I can answer any questions , please
feel free to contact me.
S
Agenda Information Memo
January 2, 1981
Page Eleven
CHES MAR EAST FOURTH ADDITION FINAL PLAT
C. Ches Mar East Fourth Addition Final Plat -- The City has re-
ceived a request from the developer of the Ches Mar East Fourth
Addition Final Plat , for the continuance of this item until the
January 20, 1981 meeting.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS MATTER: To approve or deny a con-
tinuance of the Ches Mar East Fourth Addition Final Plat until
the 1-20-81 meeting.
EXCAVATION PERMIT - HILLANDALE ADDITION
D. Excavation Permit Application for Hillandale Addition -- The
City has received an application from the Beure' Company pertaining
to grading and excavating within the Hillandale 1st Addition adja-
cent to County Road 30. All bonds, fees and insurance certificates
have been submitted and found to be in order. However, the grading
and drainage plan has been inspected by the Director of Public
Works and has been found to present some drainage problems for
adjacent property owners . The Director of Public Works has re-
quested that a revised plan be submitted showing provisions for
ahndiing all drainage onsite. The applicant has indicated that
this is possible and will be resubmitting the revised plans prior
to the Tuesday night City Council meeting on January 6 .
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS MATTER: To approve or deny the
grading/excavation permit for Hillandale 1st Addition on the condi-
tion that surface drainage generated will be handled onsite.
W.111113
1981 SEWER/WATER RATE STUDY
A. 1981 Sewer/Water Rate Study Proposal - At the last regular
meeting of the City Council on 12-16-80, the sewer and water rate
study as prepared by the firm of Bonestroo, Rosene & Anderlik was
presented for review purposes . The Director of Public Works ,
Director of Finance and City Administrator have reviewed the docu-
ments and the City Administrator and Director of Public Works will
comment on the proposal at the meeting on Tuesday. If any member
of the City Council has misplaced their rate study, please feel
free to contact this office and another copy will be distributed.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS MATTER: To approve or deny the
proposed rate study as prepared by the firm of Bonestroo, Rosene
and Anderlik.
Agenda Information Memo
January 2, 1981
Page Twelve
ZONING MAP UPDATE
B. Zoning Map Update/1981 -- Each year, the City updates the zoning
map. This year, it seemed appropriate that additional research
be provided by the staff to determine whether any zoning changes
have been overlooked in previous years to assure that this year' s
zoning map is more accurate once the update is completed. The
interns , Mr. Ulrich and Mr. Mielke, have worked on the zoning map
changes at the direction of the City Planner and City Administrator.
Administrative Intern Mielke was asked to prepare a list of all
the changes for Council consideration. There are nine ( 9) distinct
zoning changes that should be considered. There are also nine
(9 ) properties that have been designated as park land which have
never been zoned public facilities . The City staff needs directive
as to whether these City properties should be zoned, and, if so,
the nine _ parcels should be included to the aforementioned zoning
changes to complete the zoning map update. In order to process
all the final zoning, a public hearing must be scheduled with legal
notice outlining all the 'zoning changes under consideration. It
is the recommendation of the City Administrator that a public
hearing be scheduled to consider all the changes as outlined in
the attached memorandum, prepared by Administrative Intern Mielke,
found on pages 2�5 through Z' This public hearing would
be scheduled at t e e ruary 3, T791 'ity Council meeting.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS MATTER: To approve or deny a public
hearing to be set for February 3, 1981 , to consider zoning map
changes .
0
MEMO TO: City Adminstrator Hedges
FROM: Administrative Intern Mielke
DATE: December 22, 1980
SUBJECT: Zoning Map Changes
Per your request this memo is a list of zoning map changes which have
been overlooked in the past. Although they are housecleaning items ,
I would assume the city should follow regular procedure in these
regards. The following is a list of city owned properties which
never recieved proper zoning changes. I would appreciate action
taken at the next council meeting to make these changes.
1. Police Dept. from Ag to Pub. Fac.
2. Fire Hall #2 from LItoPub. Fac.
3. Fire Hall #3 from RI to Pub. Fac.
4. Ground Reservoir 55 from LI to Pub. Fac.
5. Elevated Reservoir 39 from RD to Pub. Fac.
6. Pump Station #6 from R4 to Pub. Fac.
7. Timberline Pump ,Station from Rl to Pub. Fac.
8. Cedar Grove Pump Station from Rl to Pub. Fac.
9 . In Section #4 is a parcel which is zoned industrial
over flood plain. This parcel is owned by Fort Snelling
State Park and should be rezoned back to flood plain.
(No buildings are in the area. )
Another matter of concern is the park aquisition property. Recently
the city has been aquiring outlots as park dedication. These outlots
have not officially been zoned public facilities. Fellow staff members
are not sure of the status of these outlots and the future of these
outlots. Following is a list of city owned property which are not
zoned for park purposes but have been aquired for park dedication. I
would appreciate a directive from you as to the status of these city
owned properties and whether to change the zoning so as to update
the zoning map.
PARK NAME LOCATION STATUS
Ches Mar Park Sec. 26 ,27, between Outlots C and B owned
Canterbury Forest & by city, present zoning
Ches Mar East Add. is Ag.
Coachman Park Sec. 9 W. of Fox Ridge Lots 012-51 and 014-51,
Addition totaling 8 . 41 ac which
is owned by city and is
zoned R4.
Thompson Park Ridgecliff Addition Shall be given to City
as outlot F. Presently
zoned Ag.
Northview Park Sec. 23 S. of North-
view Park. Rd. Purchased with grant
monies and dedication.
Presently zoned Ag
River Hills Trail S. of River Hills Add.
inside NSP easement Dedicated to the city for
trail.
Oak Chase Park Block 1, Lot 1 Given to City as
Block 7 , Lots 4 & 5 park dedication.
Presently zoned R1.
Lakeside Park Sec. 25 part of Lake-
side Addition. Owned by city as an
outlot. Used as
park. Presently
zoned Ag.
South Oaks Sec. 25, lots 12,13 ,
& 14 Given to City as
park dedication
presently zoned Rl.
Patrick Eagan Sec. 22 Purchased by city
for park, presently
zoned Ag.
The third and last concern is to decide a public hearing for these changes.
If this could be discussed at the next Council meeting and then set a
public hearing date, we could at least make the changes in advance,
approve the map and send it out to the press.
a�
• •
Agenda Information Memo
January 2, 1981
Page Thirteen
DAKOTA COUNTY HOUSING ASSISTANCE UPDATE
C. Dakota County Housing Assistance Update -- The Dakota County
HRA is requesting that cities in Dakota County review their housing
assistance plans (HAP) and that city councils take any action that
is necessary for updating the 1981 housing assistance plan for
their respective communities. The City Planner and Administrative
Intern have met with Carol Schultz and other employees of the HRA
to discuss the various alternatives and review the ten year and
three year goals that were set forth in the Eagan Comprehensive
Guide Plan. The City of Eagan has accomplished much of its ten
year goal for moderate housing by successfully completing the Minne-
sota Housing Finance Loan portion of the ten year goal . This was
accomplished by participating in the tax exempt mortgage financing
plan which should be concluded within the next one to two months .
The City has not fulfilled much of the low income housing goal
of 1980. The City has not fulfilled any of the Section 8 new con-
struction; however, eight of the twelve units for the rental assis-
tance program have been fulfilled. The City has participated in
the scattered site housing program which has been successful in
the City of Eagan; however, due to County Board action, it is
apparent that this program will not exist after 1981 . To insure
a favorable review by the Metropolitan Council on future grant
programs and also to provide low income housing as set forth in
the Comprehensive Guide Plan for the next ten (10) years , some
or all of the goals for housing units that were originally consi-
dered for 1980 should be carried over to 1981 . It would also be
reasonable to increase the number of units for new construction
in the scattered site program from seven to ten units for 1981 ,
which again insures the Metropolitan Council that the City of Eagan
is making all attempts and efforts to participate in a subsidized
housing program. Enclosed on pages 12 through -35' is a report
which was written by the Administrative Intern, Mr:Steve Mielke,
regarding the need to update the housing assistance plan for the
City of Eagan for 1981 . There is background provided regarding
the ten year goals the City of Eagan has set forth in the Compre-
hensive Guide Plan and also the three year funding allocation.
A discussion of the 1980 and 1981 housing allocation plans is
offered along with possible actions and recommendations for imple-
mentation of a subsidized housing program for 1981 . Carol Schultz "
of the HRA will be present to answer any questions the City Council
may have regarding action to be considered for the update of the
housing assistance plan. Please make reference to the third page
of the report which outlines two possible actions and a recommenda-
tion. The first action is to carry over twenty-five or thirty
units of new construction this year and then spread the remainder
over the rest of the following years. Reasons for this action
are listed in the report. A second action is to consider increasing
the scattered site new construction from seven to ten units which
should insure a favorable response for subsidized housing by the
0
Fourteen
Metropolitan Council . The recommendation listed in item three
is merely food for thought for how Eagan should consider the three
year housing allocation plan.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS MATTER: To provide a housing assis-
tance plan update for 1981 based on the actions mentioned above
and described in more detail in the attached report.
REVIEW
Eagan has been and presently is a member of the Dakota County
Housing and Redevelopment Authority (HRA) . A duty of the HRA
is to develop a Housing Assistance Plan (HAP) . This plan is
a guide for the County in determining where to distribute rent
subsidy monies. The HAP is also a determining factor in the "213
Review Process. " The 213 Review Process is a ranking of proposed
projects within the Dakota County HRA. The rankings indicate to
the Metropolitian Council which projects Dakota County feels are
most beneficial to the County. The 213 Review and the HAP must
be in accord in order to receive a favorable review. A negative
review would probably cause the funding to be denied. Dakota
County HRA is presently revising its HAP for the coming year
and have requested that we analyze our situation and respond to
their office, it is necessary for Eagan to carefully consider the
options available.
The Metropolitian Council has identified a 10 year "full share"
d)f subsidized housing for all communities within the Metropolitian
Area. This full share" is the number of units that Eagan is
expected to )Deed and fulfill within a ten year period. _ It is to
Eagan' s benefit to show in the Comprehensive Plan that Eagan is
in accord with the Council ' s goal. This 10-year goal is , however
merely that, a goal, and is of no consequence to the City' s "3-
year funding allocation. " The 3-year funding allocation is a
monetary allocation set aside by the Metropolitian Council for use
on approved projects within Eagan.
The following is a representation of the 10-year goal as presented
by the Metropolitian Council. Also shown are Eagan' s plans to
meet the housing needs in the next 10 years as stated in the Eagan
Comprehensive Guide Plan.
10 YEAR GOALS MET COUNCIL 1040-2600 UNITS
Eagan
A. Minnesota Housing Finance Loan 350 Units
B. New Sec. 8 Construction +300 Units
C. Scattered Site `lousing 100 Units
D. Rent Subsidy Plan 590 Units
E. Mobile Home Park 200 Units
1, 540 Units
The 3-year funding allocation for Eagan as set aside by the Met-
ropolitian Council totals $284 , 418 . 00. This money is set aside
for the period of January 1, 1980 - September 30 , 1983 , and is
allocated to approved projects as they are proposed.
3YEAR FUNDING ALLOCATION
Family $178 , 764. 00 Equivalent to 41 Units new const. or
50 Section 8 Exist
Large Family $45 , 785. 00 8 Units new const. or
11 Units Section 8 Exist
Elderly $59 ,869 . 00 13 Units New Const or
19 Units Sec. 8 Exist
Total $284 ,418 .00 Or 62 Units New Const. or
3 80 Units Sec. 8 Exist
Page two
As was already stated, the starting date of this allocation was
January 1 , 1980 and is set aside until September 30 , 1983 .
The 1980 Dakota County HAP has started an agreed goal between
Eagan and the HRA, of 63 units. The following is a represent-
ation of Eagan ' s 1980 goals and the number of units of that
goal that were fulfilled.
1980 Housing Allocation Plan - Goal
Sec. 8 New Const. Sec. 8 Rent. Asst. Rehab Housina Total
Goal 50 12 1 63 units
Fulfilled - 8 - 8 units
1981 Housing Allocation Plan - Goals
Sec. 8 New Const. Sec. 8 Rent. Asst. Rehab Housing Total
Goal 7 10 - 17 units
These goals are considerably less than what is needed to comply with
our Comprehensive Plan or the Metropolitian Council 's goals and
could cause some projects to receive negative reviews.
The HRA staff has informed us that the scattered site housing may
be discontinued after Fiscal Year 1981. This is due to the fact
that the County Board does not want to underwrite the program.
Eagan has, in the past, been very active in this area and has
preferred this type of subsidization over many of the other
programs.
At a recent meeting with HRA staff, we were offered the opportunity
to carry over some or all of our Sec. 8 new construction goals
from 1980. This will allow us to demonstrate that Eagan is com-
mitted to the concept of providing subsidized housing, and
would cause projects to recieve favorable reviews. If we carry
over some or all of the 1980 goal , Eagan shall offer to developers
the opportunity of subsidizing some units to help the project fly.
Another consideration is the fact that there are persons on a
waiting list who desire and qualify for subsidized housing in
Eagan. The following is a representation of the current waiting
list.
Waiting List Presently
Section 8 Existing Scattered Site
2 bedroom 18 6
3 bedroom 18 19
4 bedroom 4 6
40 31 = 71 TOTAL
These applicants all qualify to use new construction if available.
33
Page three
Possible Actions And Recommendations
There are several considerations to discuss before we can respond
to the HRA.
1. Since we didn't meet our goals in 1980 , and our 1981 HAP
does not meet requirements , we should carry some or all
of our 1980 goal units over to 1981 .
It would seem to make sense to carry over at least 25 or 30 units
of new construction this year and then spread out the rest over
the following years. To do this would:
A. Insure our City of receiving a favorable review from the
Metropolitian Council on other grant programs applied for.
(Policy 39)
B. Subsidized units can be used as a marketing tool to help
questionable projects go that normally wouldn't. If we
don't increase our goals , the projects that apply for
subsidized units will not receive a favorable review.
C. There is a waiting list for Sec. 8 housing and to increase
our goal would demonstrate that Eagan is concerned for the
public ' s needs.
D. Although we accept the higher goal, the Council still has
the last word on each new project.
2 . The HRA is willing to grant a new cooperation agreement to
increase our allocation of scattered site new construction
from 7 to 10 units. Eagan should do this for following
reason:
A. This would indicate to Metropolitian Council that we are
responding favorably towards subsidized housing.
3 . What does Eagan want to see in the future with regards to
the 1981 to 1984 housing plan?
A. This shall require a decision as to what steps Eagan should
take in the future towards fullfilling the needs of its
citizenship in the area of subisdized housing.
B. If we agree to an increase in the 1981 HAP, we _should be
able to spread the next HAP in smaller increments.
C. Eagan should keep the 1981 to 1984 HAP consistent with
the HRA and Metropolitian Council 3 year allocation so
as to help insure funding of projects the council approves
of.
3�
ATTACHMENT #1
Subsidized housing is available to eligible applicants in two (2)
basic types :
A. Rental Subsidies
B. Subsidized Home Ownership
The rental Subsidies Program is more commonly known as the "Section
8" Program. The Section 8 Program is designed to help low and
moderate incomes. There are currently three (3) approaches to
Section 8 funding:
A. Leasing existing units
B. New construction
c. Substantially rehabilitated housing
Rents may not exceed certain dollar amounts and the eligible house-
hold is required to pay no more than 25% of its monthly income for
rent.
The Subsidized Home Ownership Programs are more commonly known as
the "Section 235" Program and the "Affordable Homes Program" . The
former program is a Federally-funded program and the latter is a
State-funded program. Both are designed to offer limited home
ownership to households in the moderate to lower-middle income levels.
Of the two (2) types of subsidized housing, the more commonly used
program is the Section 8 Program. This is due to tha lack of funds
in the Home Ownership Programs.
Both types of subsidized housing be offered as scattered site de-
velopments.
The Scattered Site Concept is an attempt to develop a mixture of
income levels within a neighborhood or a community. This dis-
persion of subsidized units throughout a community should insure
better quality units and avoid some undesirable social complications .
NOTE: It should be noted that the Metropolitian Council endorses
the Scattered Site Concept for the above stated reason. The
City of Eagan has enforced this endorsement by making a policy
of accepting only Scattered Site Projects which are of no more
than 20o subsidized units.
3 �
0 0
Agenda Information Memo
January2, 1981
Page Fifteen
AMUSEMENT DEVICE LICENSE
D. Amusement Device License -- Action has been taken to enforce
the Amusement Device License Ordinance #73 , and, therefore, eight
(8) businesses have made application for amusement device license.
The ordinance requires a ten p.m. closing time for operation of
the amusement devices . At least four (4) of the applicants have
requested a variance from the 10 p.m. closing to l a.m. to stay
consistent with their other business practices . There was no spe-
cific consideration given to the 10 p.m. closing when the ordinance
was drafted other than a curfew for younger children. . It may be
that the City Council desires an amendment to the hours for closing.
These applications will be reviewed and given proper inspection
prior to the meeting on Tuesday. Enclosed on page :3 --7 is a list
of the amusement device license applicants.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS MATTER: To approve or deny the
amusement device license applications as presented. Also consi-
deration should be given either to amend the ordinance to extend
the closing time from 10 p.m. to 1 a.m. or consideration for a
variance to those business establishments requesting a variance
of time later than 10 p.m.
36
MEMO TO: Eagan City Council
FROM: City Clerk
SUBJECT: Amusement Device Licenses
DATE: December 23, 1980
The following business establishments have applied for Amusement De-
vice Licenses for the year July 1, 1980- June 30, 1981 in order to
comply with Ordinance #73 Amusement Devices.
BUSINESS # OF MACHINES FEE OTHER
1. Amore Pizza & Deli 2 50. 00
2. Cedarvale Lanes Over 15 400. 00 Variance from 10 pm
3. Eagandale Club3 75.00 closing
4. Stark 's Halfway House Over 15 400.00
it
5. Mr. D 's Pizza 3 75. 00 of
6. La Fondas 2 50.00
7. Pizza Hut 1 25.00 I
8. Rupert 's Up to 15 200.00 ofi
i
The above applications have been referred to the Police Department for
inspection and approval. The four applicants who requested a variance
from the 10 :00 P.M. closing to 1:00 P.M. feel it would be a hardship
to close the machines so early. The other applicants may not be aware
of the ordinance requirement for 10:00 P.M. closing and therefore did
not contact me regarding it.
3�
i
MEMO TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND 'CITY COUNCILMEMBERS
FROM: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES
DATE: JANUARY 2, 1981
!j
SUBJECT: INFORMATIVE MEMO
Enclosed on pages 301 through -4-0 is the most recent copy of
the tax exempt mortgage -financing program for the City of Eagan.
The City has received modified guidelines for the Comprehensive
Guide Plan Amendment process this week. In a quick review of the
new guidelines , it appears that most of the concerns that were
addressed at the last public hearing by various cities have been
satisfied. A more detailed study will be made in preparation for
the second public -hearing which is scheduled on January 22, 1981 .
A copy of the new guidelines is enclosed on pages 4- 1 through
for your review. The City of Apple Valley has haH two changes
to submit to the Metropolitan Council regarding their Comprehensive
Guide , Plan and the turn around time on both items was ten days
The City Administrator has negotiated with Mr. Jim Sewald regarding
his assessment appeal for assessments levied against Overview
Estates, a part of Project #241 . Mr. Sewald has submitted a letter
to the City dismissing his assessment appeal on the Overview Estates
replat with the understanding that building permits will be allowed
on those lots.
DATE: DeCEMer 18, 1980
CITY CP EAGAN
$16,940,000--Amount of Program
Dollar Amount of Funds Remaining
$ 413,445 ***
Low Income $ 279,775
Basic Income $ 133,670
Single Family Funds Remaining
$ 109020 (Closed)
Condo Funds Remaining
$ 230,750 (Closed)
Townhouse Funds Remaining
$ 72.,775 (Closed)
Mobile Heine Funds Remaining
(Inclusive--Not a Separate.Account) $
Conventional 95% Funds Ranaining
(91-95% Conventional loans) $ 413 445
Graduated Conventional Funds Remaining $
91,200 (Closed)
Graduated 95% Conventional Funds Remaining $
91,200
Total Pre-Cocom tment Arount
$
Total Reserved (Yet to be Pre-Committed) $ 5,850,180 ***
16,940,000 ***
3`�
DATE: December 18, 1980
C ITY OF E:N;AN
Statistical Data-- I'munt of Program $16,940,000
Total Nmoult of Pre-Cainuttecl Loans
Percentage of Loans Pre-Committed $ 10,676,375
63 %
Low Inconx, Basic Income
Total Number of Loans 121_ 72
Average Mortgage Amount 52,470—
$ 60,103
Average Sale Price 58,063 64,836
Average Appraisal Value 58,381
65,886
Average Adjusted Gross Income 20,163
24,869
Average Gross Incon>e 21,574 26,432
Type of Loan
Insured Conventional 6
Uninsured Conventional 13
FHA
VA -28 33
Graduated Pledge 15 19
65 3
Average Loan to Value Ratio:
Insured Conventional 900
Uninsured Conventional 900
730 780
Number of New Construction Loans _ 90 -- 47
Number of Lcisting Loans 31 25
`type of Dwelling:
Single Family 57
Townhouse 47
Condaninium 0 - --- —
Mobile Hanes 0� 10
0
Average Previous Residents 0
Number of Renters 150 29%87 48
NL nber of Owners
Sex: 34 24
Male
Female 78 64
Average Family Size 43 8
Average Number of Children 1.8 2.3
Marital Status: — - .6
Married
Single_ 41
,joint ---��_
Divorced 9
FUNDING: 3 5
Lollar Amount of Loans Funded
Nr or Loans __4,153,400
75
40
#
0'
°? 0
� y
13
300 Metro Square Building, 7th Street and Robert Street, Saint Paul, to 55_ rea 612, 291-6359
�z
December 22, 19
TO: Metropolitan Area Citizens and Local Officials
The Metropolitan Council will hold a second public hearing on January 22, 1981,
on modified guidelines the Council will use to review amendments to city,
township and county comprehensive plans prepared under the 1976 -Metropolitan
Land Planning Act. A copy of the public hearing draft, Metropolitan Council
Guidelines for Reviewing Local Comprehensive Plan Amendments, is enclosed.
The guidelines would require local governments to submit all but "housekeeping"
amendments and changes to capital improvement-programs to the Council for review.
The Council would notify the local government within 10 days as to which "leve!"
of review it would conduct:
1. Proposed amendments with a potential impact on a metropolitan system -- sewers,
transportation, parks, airports -- would be reviewed within 90 days of receipt.
The local government could not adopt or implement such an amendment until the
Council completed its review.
2. All other proposed amendments would be subject to a 60-day Council review
and comment period for consistency with other regional plans in the Council's
Metropolitan Development Guide Ceg. housing, health., solid waste} . Proposed
amendments with no potential impact on a regional plan would be reviewed at
the earliest possible Council meeting after receipt. A local government could
adopt and implement such amendments during the review period.
The proposed guidelines contain 12 criteria the Council would use to decide
whether proposed amendments have a potential im-act on a metropolitan system.
The criteria cover amendments that would affect such things as sewer capacity,
standards for on—site sewers, acquisition of land designated for regional parks
or reserves, metropolitan airport functions, or functions of the metropolitan
highway system.
A local government *.could also be required to submit proposed amendments to adjacent
communities and affected school districts for comment.
4
An Agency Created to Coordinate the Planning and Development of the Twin Cities Metropolitan Area Comprising:
Anoka County O Carver County 0 Dakota County o Hennepin County O Ramsey County 0 Scott County 0 Washington Cour a_,
The public hearing will be at 2 p.m. in the Council Chambers, 300 Metro Square
Building, St. Paul. The hearing record will remain open for written comments
until the close of the Business day on Feb. ? Additional copies of the
hearing draft are available from the Council by calling 291-6464.
Sincerely,
Charles Weaver
Chairman
CW/kg
Enclosure
r ,
.C:-• or L'C•.,..
• :•3795 Pilot Knob Road
• Eagan, Minnesota 55122
• APPLICATION FCR ON-SALE
F7XXIi.'1T1:,G L:CUGR LICZNSE
• part II Personal Inforw-.tion
+-•cttcra: 7""is fora must be filled out in duplicate with typewriter or by
printing in ink by Cha sole owner, by each partner, by epch manager, proprietor
o: other avcnt in charge of the prinises, by each person who ;,y combined o-.n. cr-
sh:p or control has an interest in a eorporatian or association is excess of 5%.
• •
Date:_ /19/81 .
• _ Thomas Jerold Raymond
Tr-.;e Nzue: - (latt, :irzt, middle)
1810 Co. Rd. 30, Eagan, MN 55122 454-1464 .
1._ Heside:cu Address: (Num4ar, Street, City, State) 3. Phone No:
4889 Pilot Knob Rd. Eagan, MN 55122 454-1464/4541770
4. Zu.:ncss AQdress: (`umber, Street, City, State) 5. Phone No:
Minneapolis- Hennepin- Minnesota 1/11/39
6. Place of Hrr.91 (City, County, State) 7. Date 31rzh �Mo. Day & V..r:
d. U.S. Cltiaan? Yes yr• No. Naturalized? Yes_ NoL_ If yes, give date :.•:�
place:
T. I`_ you ba ve ever urle4l. or bean 'Mcm n by a name or names other tha,,s L'ce true
rase Zi7mn io 41 a:)OVC, list such nares) and information eoncercing dates a_d.
places —hr;:—t usej.
Dates, Places and Circumstsnccs '
lei. 113-.ttak Status: Single.; Marx iedX Widowed— Divorced Separsted_
11. 1: -carried, true uame. place and date of birth and residence address of
suite: True name: Carol Jean Thomas _
Place and date of birth: C o uet,'1Rinneso• a _
Reotdence Address: 1810 o. Rd JU, Eagan,
12. Ara ycu a registered voter & if so, where? Yes X• No Eagan
Is your spouse a registered voter 4 if so, where? Yes,X I _ Eagan
13. Addre-ir•(a) at 1-h ch you have lived during preceding ten years. (Benin •'+i ti.
• P:•cczt or Uut c4c;:ess sud work back)
X30. And St•_t Cit} and State Dates
18"10 Co Rd 30 Eagan, MN _ 1967
E
14, Address(ed) at which y5•.,r spouse has lived durirg •preceding ten years.
(9eoin with rresent or last ad.zess and w:r% back)
I.,T. a-,da^TP_t C:' aril Stare r,t"s
1810 Co. Rd. 30, Eagan, MN 55122 1967
;.5. Xir.', ae�x eni locicion of ever- bttc:nss or cecu?ctic.:. yo•_ :.-•-e been
--:,c -,r2ced;% t '.] years. (B-,;in with present cc fat=t a-r._ 'r5.^. .'.'t:
t: L:s:ion: Street Add., N-AZU--: o: :u� _�••_
` r^.c,:aat'on City_ 6 R—te o•_____t -•c=�t_c_�
• DiamondT Ranch Eagan, MN Riding Stable
Sears P
M ls, MN 900 E Lake St. Salesman
_ — •+ ._____.__..,.�...
..,f—. -
16. 1.j.,;, n=e rr►d locatiou of-every' business or occupation your spouse I%zs
beet erZeeci to dc.in the preceding tea years. (Begin with present oz la:t cre
fir?c ar.d work Sack) Locaticn: Street Add. , Mitur of !U:4.=$
*,:.iress or erc::7:i•'on City b State ^r nrcj_nt_•_
•RCA_Corp 6750 France Ave. So./Mpls Expiditer^
�QME, Inc _ _ Mendota Hts _rd, Eagan, MN r Office_ _ • r
Blue Line Equip. Meadowbrook Rd, St Louis Pk . Office
17. Names and eedrescea o! y�cr e.:ployers acd ptrtnerr. if any, for tha
Z!:g tc-a y_%:3. (Begin a:_h r::::!•:ot cr USS -•:.a first w _:%- bzr%)
• •..,(,'tri. .-?! i:,rc •.r nrrrw+:n A-*4ra "Pi. bi:v 3:.r
IC. ►:pct: a^3 addrese-9 of your spouses eaployers and partners, if
t':^ ;:iccd:ry ten years. (Beg:n with present or last one first and .:crk 53:.w)
W- e9: Er-lovers o: Dartn^_rs Addresses: City end StPte D_t•s
12. E:ir y^U. YOLr 0;:I�:Fe, or child of either or woe, e,ter fPna ccr:i::'=: of
z=• c.ix_ or vial:fist o: arty ordinance, oth2v tUin tr-ff':c? Yco_ X
:11-Ye-j. y.va <_nfcr wtfoa as to the ti�.e, place and ofierse foc wilk6h :owic=-�'
vete Fad:
• -2- ,
% 20. Ha..e you, ycur 577' tea, or a'pare^t, brother, sister or child of either o: ycu,
ever been ang3Ee3 as an er_nlcyee or in cperating a ealocn, rotel, restaurant, cafe,
tavern cr ctter bu3ine3c of a eicilir nature: Yea No�X
y ic., give Lmfr 'catica as to tha t:.re, place and length cf t.m_.
21. Have you been ::jI -:itary service? Yeses No
if a j, w43 disc.israe(s) ever other than hcrcr atle? Yes :Jo4�
(LFc: re;u^st,, you may be required to exhib t all dischacE_s.)
22. .::Ge3. re-sider.:e add.rest, b,.3=ess adiry s., and tele-'cne :t:_`�ra of ea--h �F'rs•.
tt� :; -ugaze- 1n *Air.ne30ta in tus:..ness of selling, car:•`:fac:;:r:n3 or ('_3':it:::
::.tc.=ca'y^c 1_;•-,)r and r.-ho is nearar of k:.n to you or ycu.^ sp.Ou=3 .wrn 9r:^.13 ccu�
wt:et: ;
r c. ':e wrc'_e of half blood, coc;.uted by the rules of ci nil law, or c as
a Sr:t��'a -+rr-1Zw or wt.o is a sister-:n-law of.you or your souse.
• 'leciaenCe :ddr ee3. F`:cre__ _
E'izlness taldress Ph.—ne
1
�•..- 2. Ful 12�aac ReIatiorah
usieecce Add+'esc Phone
23. Are you a canufacturer or wholesaler of intoxicating liquor or ir.!erc:tel
1 directly or indirectly in the ownership or operation of any such b:teine.;s
Yes :Jo X
24, Are you directly or indirectly interested in other establis.rents
of ra_an to which a license of the same kind has been issued? Yes :':• X_,
25. A---3 ycu the spouse cf a person who would be ineligible for r l:cen32"
Yes No X
25. '1+nat is the atourt or ir.:e: :ent that you will pare s
building, rrec isea, fitturero, ft,ruit'.:re, atock intraday etc. , =d %;'ha t wa:-, t:,s
sn- :e cf SUC! ;ire,? $550,000.00
27. ;v; ;c, h_,: a-y int--rest in any previous infoxicatine liquor• 1 i e_nc: ;,'. v
sa•:knn.:ed cr no-4 renewed? YesNo_�, If Yes, explai. in de tai..
23. Hr-.-e yCl ever individually, or with others, wade application in any ..:. i-
N'.ity for an intoxicating liquor license and had such application denied?
Yee_„_ No X _ If so, wtere and what were conditions of denial?
CCUI'IY CF )
being first duly sworn upon his/her oath, eeccses sr
says a/e%a io tWPF-rsor. who has executed the above Personal Lerrmat=oti f''
aa(% that the stat,-.ents made therein are true of his/her cwn ,m 41 'gs :.n1 ti_l�.d
AA
Susc �
:.btd aryl r•.rorn to bef:-,-#
V
�e this(- day o� Notate Public o`l Cour+Uy
% � e�.�o�cs'inort••es•►arerf'
1 Q [.
' •.. • .,. •.tin..►rr.. . ..
C17, or. Enc;, .. . J•5
• '' •fix ':3795 Pilot Knob Road
Eagan, Minnesota 55122 `
• APPLICATION FOR ON-SALE
T.`_7 OXICATING L:QUGR LICENSE
Part II Personal Inforw-ition
}
D{recticrs: This form must be filled out in dug'licate with typewriter or by
printing in ink by the sole owner, by each partner, by ePch manager, proprietor
o: other agznt in charge of the premises, by each person who by combined owner-
ship or control has an interest in a corporatian pr association in excess of 5%.
• Date:
January 8, 1980
• _ _McCrea Pamela Ann
True have: (last, first, middle)
_ 4330 Sequoia Drive Eagan Minnesota 454-7427
Y. Residence Addzcss: (Number, Street, City, State) 3. Phone No: Yy
4330 Sequoia Drive Eagan Minnesota 454-7427 'f
4. Business Aodress: (Number, Street, .City, State) 5. Phone No: ,Y
Minneapolis, Hennepin, Minnesota 11-29-50
b. place of Birth (City, County, State) 7. Date of Birth (Mo. Day
S. U.S. Citizen? Yes X Nom. Naturalized? Yes Noz If yes, give date ane
place:
S. Y`_ you have ever umed or b--en known by a name or names other tIuan the true. -
paw ei•pen is p1 r_;3ove, list such name(s) and information concerting dates and.
piaaes used. ,
Dates, Places and Circumstanecs
10. 113zitsl. Status: Single _ Marrieds Widowed_ Divorced Separsted_
11. x_.married, true varve, place and date of birth and residence address of
sncues: True name: Mark McCrea -
Place and date of birth: _,Snft_1_k�_,=&i"4A 11-10-53 - ---
Reoidened Address: . h330 Saginia-DrivA Eagan -•
s
y
11). Are you a registered voter b if so, where? - Yes Z No City of Eagan w
13 your spouse a registered voter b if so, Where? Yes_ Vo—City-of Eagan
13. Adrreor.(_9) at t:hich you have lived during preceding ten years. (Degin
P<-scat or jest r4dzess and work back)
N-3. hq-d Street City and State Dates 3
Seqnoia Drive
3220 Clinton Abe. South ERIs., M1 12-1-74-to 5-1-78 �
7
Gage Center MSU Mankato Minnesota 9-1 -68 to 12-1-7h ?
JoYn Minnehaha Court Wayzata•minnesota 11-29-50 to 9-15.68 xa
t �
14. Address(es) at which your spouse has lived during preceding ten years.
(Begin with present or last address and wc•rk back)
No. and Street City and State Dates
h330 Sequoia Drive Eagan Minnesota 5-1-78 to present
3220 Clinton Ave. South Mimeolis, Mne 12-1-7h to 8-15-7
Gage enter and
Searing Center MSU Mankato Minnesota 9-15-69 to 12-1-74
2WPitch Kettle Rd. Suffolk Virginia 1-10- to 9-15-69
:.5. Kftr , nerve end location of every bit--.nas or occupation yoc ^.:-e been e-�.ngcd
Ovrit; _:'.e preced-ln& ten years. (Baoin with present cr Lunt a44-ess a-ti c.k
.r
t.. k; L_s:ion: Street Add., t:e:.urc v �.usilsss s
B'.i-ine-ss or u^.ct1Pata o*T City & State or occnz!�•�tr ' ,�.`
Employment and Training Prog, 150 S. Kellogg Ave. St., Paul Supervise CETA Prog.
CETA (Employment and Trailing) 1009 Nicollet Ave. Kpls. Associate Director . t :
—D�t�t�sr'af'persaame]�
Goodwill Industries df Mike. 3800 Washington Ave. North and Rehabilitation r'
16. Iii,d, ==e znd locatiou of every business or occupation your spouse has tR
beeit en neei in du=iug the preceding ten years. (Begin with present or last cre
first and worn back) Location: Street Add., Nature of Buc{ness s'
viliness or eccuy3tion Citv 6 State ^r c+ncs^nti;+;
_... r:
acational Rahabili tatin Gran_ Mnl Q , Mn [nn _awliand --
Sacw:Jty anard Mankata- Xn_ 'Reenrtty_Guard
17. Names and addressea of your employers and partners. if any, fon tza p-ccc-
6!rg ten ya%r3. (Begin w:_:+ cr iF.3L e•r.n first n .;; Go_k bar..:)
`'�1El� ��1'^J T t1 _a t►::'.j ':P v i^-'i 3::".�i J�o'e T •.. ", t.
State Of Minnesota 150 E. Kellogg Ave. St.Paul 8-15-77 to present F,
HIRED 2.009 Nicollet Ave Mpls. -7-1-76 to 8=15_,77
Goodwill-Industries of Mpls. - 3800 Washington Ave. 9-1-733 to 7-1-76
s�
le. %Acres a^i zddr.esEas` of your spouee•s employers and partner3, ii any, f.r
t'. ;_.^_CEdirs ten yeas. (Begin with present or last one first and c:crk hick)
N_v-c9: cz-+?overs o. partnere Addresses: City and State DDst-�s
State of Mn. 1315 Perm Ave. North 10-1-73 torp esent
Mankato State University Wankato, Mn. 10.1-70 tar to-1-73
L9 P.--ji y^ni. yot-r aprtzse, or child of either or nor, e•yer bpeD ccr•:ir:`.. of^
1r,;1;• c_im_ o: v;.vl.�tion of any ordinance, other tLan tr-ft-.c? YCSS ;�4x
---
;A ye';: Pva. infcrm3ti.oa as to the time, place and offense for :x�a;ch conLic:i� 3
-"s
we.e had; --
20. Have you, your spvea, ora parent, brother, sister or child of either of you,
ever been ang3ged as an erplcyee or in operating a saloon, hotel, restaurant, cafe,
tavern or cUter business of a similar nature? Yes No x
L' Ycz# give in_`armatici as to tha title, place and length of time.
21. Have you been _n military service? Yes No
If Ye;j, was discharge(s) ever other than honorable? Yes NO M s
(Upcn request, you may be required to exhibit all discharges.)
22. Name3. residence address, business adixesss., and telephone numbers of each pers,n
trt:c ;.; engages: in Minnesota in the tus:.ness of selling, manufacturing o: e° 3t:i.butir.-
4nto,:ica*1rG 11q°--or and vho is nearer of kin to you or your spousa than second ecu-i:
wtet_r�r c: ;l;e whole of half blood, computed by the rules of civil law, or vino ie
a brc•tir:r-ill-lzw or vd:o is a sister-in-law of you or your spouse. ;
. Fo-11 Ngme Relationship
• aecidence Addres3 Phone r
X•
E i:,�.ness Address Phcne
?..- 2. Full Name Relationship
Residence Add:,ese Phone
23. Are you a manufacturer or wholesaler of intoxicating liquor or inter^stall
directly or indirectly in-the ownership or operation of any such business:
Yes No• x `
24, Are you directly or indirectly interested in other establishments in t."p "illil;: �
of Fagan to which a license of the same kind has been issued? Yes S1X -
'A'
25. A:,as you the spouse'cf a person who would be ineligible for a licen3:? sib
Yes No x x
26: "rJhat: is the zLcount of it vzctment that; you will have in the bur-:ems; ir.•' ►-a
building, premise3, fixt1_wez9 fia•riit•,;re, Stock in trade, etc., and trhat was t_'
act cf sur-'l •^ons;;-? Source: Corp. Assets
Approximate $75000.00 Bank Financing
7 ,u:i h:` an y in tz:est in any previous intoxicating liquor 1i T,;nc� t,r_'t.
�.:._t;endled cr no•L renewed? Yes _ No 8 If Yes, explain in detail.
23, Five ycu ever individually, or with others, made application in any mtnici-
pality for an intoxicating liquor license and had such application denied? '
Yes No x If so, where and what were conditions of denial?
S.'^.'I,S Op Minnesota )
COi M CF Dakota ) r
Pamela Ann HoCr , being first duly sworn upon his/!ie.r oath, dgxses sr d
says that he/era is the person+ who has executed the above Personal Infrrmet!o►i fc:m'
8nc; that the btatc-4ents made therein are true of rr own knowledge and belie i. r`
Suss abed and rworn to bef; • _
-�- N ter b
me .this / dy of /y
og1OTARY — tNNESOTA
19 z "PE
1�
My Commission Exp --
t.F ` ires May 19.1981
�', `'
fig `,%':%3795 Pilot Knob Road
Eagan, Minnesota 55122
APPLICATION FOR ON-SALE j>'
T.'WOXICATING LIQUOR LICZNSE
Part II • Personal Inforw4tion `
x'
Dtrectiers: This form must be filled out in duplicate with typewriter or by max•
printing in ink by the sole owner, by each partner, by Lech manager, proprietor
or other agat in charge of the premises, by. each person who by combined owner-
-
sh;p or control ha3 an interest in a corporation pr association in excess of 5%.
4Date:
r,n nom'.-sem
• _Mcrran tdarlf _ NMfN
1 True Naze: (last, first, middle)
1=3.3�aliela nriow ra cots �{ � 7 27
1. Residence Address: (Num er, Street, City, State) 3. Phone No: `
1330 See 454-7427 .'
4. Eu,incss Andress: (NumBer, Street, City, State) 5. Phone No: ,
Suffolk Nansemond -County Virginia January 10, 1951 , ~
6. Place of Birth: (City, County, State) 7. Date of Birth (Mo. Day E: Ft.r.
S. U.S. Citizen? Yes x Nom, Naturalized? Yes_ No X If yes, give date a+w;
._ place: r .i
S. if you have ever u'+ed or been ';nom*n by a name or names other tiiart the true.
rase given in #1 .trove, list such name(s) and information concerting dates and. . .
places .-bn.., used. i?
I•_3:+�Q Dates, Places and Circumstances
10, 113:itsl Status: Single _ Married
,iu Widowed_ Divorced Separsted
11. t: married, true name, place and date of birth and residence address of
spouse: True name: Pamela Ann Manson (kcCrea)
Place and date of birth: Minneapolis. Minnesota 29-50
Residence Address: 4330 Sequoia Drive Eargan Mn., 55122
12. Are ycu a registered voter b if so,' where? Yes _X_ No City of Eagan
Is your spouse a registered voter 6 if so, where? Yeses Ito___-Xity of Eagan
13. Addreoe(cs) at 0hich you have lived during preceding ten years. (Deain :*lth
Pr•ccat or lest t44ress asd work back)
o. And Stteet City and State Dates
a Sequoia Drive Eagan Minnesota 5-1-7$ to Dream '
3220 Clinton Ave; South Minneapolis Mn. 12-1-7h to 5_-2-78 _
"Z}age Center . 9-15-69 to 12-1-74
Searing Center Mankato State University Mankato,, Mn. ;
204 Pitch Kettle .Road Suffolk Virginia 1-10-51 to 9-15-69
4
i .
i
14. Address(es) at which your spouse has lived during preceding ten years.
(Begin with present or last address and wc%r.c back)
Vo. and Street City .and State Dates
4330 Sequoia Drive E;ge MIMSota 5-1-78 to pragmt _
,_322o Clinton Ave, South HinnelMolis MBS 12-1-TL to 5-1-78
u;
Gage Center MSU Mankatom HU, .9-15-68 to 12 1-7h
3071 Minnehaha Court Wayzata, man. 11-29-50 to 9-15-68
:.5. :Lir.!, vase _►nd loc.:tion of: every bt:Winss or occupation. yo�_- ;:^.-e been e-�Znged
it? cvr1c .•::e cr2cedin6 tea years. (Be-in with present cr l.act a44t-nss n.-A
Lztarion: Street Add., Nitu-. o- .u;:less
Bu •in�ss or Ocetiaat{on City & State
ve O•
Vocational Rehabilitation Conn. M nneapo s, M?nnesota Coanselim _,_
Security Guard _ Mankato Minnesota Security Guard_ d,
Student Mankato State University Mankato, Minnesota Student
16. Eiud, n=e cnd location of every business or occupation your spouse has
beeit engneed in do=ing the preceding ten years. (Begin with present or lash cre
fir.tt and work back) Location: Street Add., Nature of *_Uc-I ess
Diciness or erc pation City A State ^r nncu-nti n
Employment and Training Programs 150 8, Kellogg Blvd. St. _Paul Svervisor of CSTA
Programa
CETA (Employment and Training) 1009 Nicollet Ave. Mpls. Mn., Associate Director
Qoodw111 1WustrIes of KpIs. Director of Personnel a''
Rehabilitation Counseling 3800 Washington. Ave. North _ Rehabilitation
17. Names and addresses of yrur etployers and pertners, if any, for tha prccc-
4+;.g ten y3h:3. (Begin w---S p_:::�_nt cr Lr.3i: !':..' fi_St r:.v wur' b rk)
r'':!G'�i: A. r r nrrtn•!-;O �lt.!�!c• PQ a �i='i 3:: t��►` p �I'�_�� f
1315 Penn Ave. North Mpls.o .10-1-U to present
Mankato State University Mankato, Minnesota 10-1- to 10-1-73
1C. XAL-es ani cddress,si of your spouse's employers and partaer3, if a.It,
p.ccEdirg ten years. (3egin with present or last one first and t.crk ysck) _
Nns-e9: Ernloyers or pnrtn^_re Addresses: City end State Dat--s
~Stats of Mi naweata 15o E. Kellogg Ave. St.Paul 8-15=77 t&.p
HIEW 1009 Nicollet Ave. Mpls-. 7-1-76 to 8-15-77 is
Goodwill Industries of Mpla. 3800 Washington Ave. North 9-1-73 t0. 7-1-76
1.9. P.c r yt u- yot.r spnztse, or child of either o: you, ever bPna ccr:!i::`ea of
L= ;-Ir c_imc o cialrtion of ar�y ordinance, other tLnn- .iraff X? Yca
+;dyegive:. infcrm3ti.oa as to the time, place and offense for wlit:h c0ayicti3=.3
were had;
r
. -2- - x
.f"
j
20. Have you, your sp--n!7a, or a•parent, brother, sister or child of either of you,
ever been eng3ged as an employee or in operating a saloon, hotel, restaurant, cafe,
tavern or ctIer businesc of a similar nature? Yea No x
IZ Ye:., give information as to tha time, place: and length of time,
21. Have you been in military service? Yes No X
If 'Lei, was discharge(s) ever other than honorable? Yes No �
(Upon request, you may be required to exhibit all discharges.) ,
22. N;:me3. residence address, business adires3, and telephone nu=mbers of each 1pe: S'
Mr2-,o ;.o ugaged in .�innesota in the business of selling, manufacturing or e-43tri.butiri
1.Ztc.acatlr+g 1_- r and who is nearer of kin to you or your spousa than second ecuoi:
wl:et_:rr c- -he rrto?a of half blood, computed by the rules of civil law, or wao 3.s
a br:•ti:-.r- n-12w or who is a sister-in-law of you or your spouse.
1. Fol.l :;?me- Relationship ._
• ?ecidence Address. Phone
Dizi ess Address Phone
fi
?..� 2. Full Name Relationship
P,esieerce Ad3:•ess Phone h ry
23. Are you a manufacturer or wholesaler ,of intoxicating liquor or inter^-ted
directly or indirectly in the ownership or operation of any such businejs'
Yes NO X x
24. Are you directly or indirectly interested in other establish.^ients it t}-�% 'Ells ;:
of Ea-an to which a license of the sabre kind has been issued? Yes No
-
25. Ara you the spouse cf a person who would be ineligible for a licen3a?
Yes No x
26: •elhat is the a zount of invectment that: you will bare in the tM:c:=ems; ir.:1_-:_'5.n7
building, prerdse3, fixtures, fts•il:ture, stock in trade, etc., and Mrha t wa:, t:,ls
39-1- A cf aur-'l rune:-? Approximately Source: Corp. Assets /Bank Financing <;
PP te]Y $75,000.00
2- w:ti= -o-,s hl----A' an into est
�. � , "y in a-l;i previous intoxicating liquor l i^.:nos V!^_t e•:��- : ';;�
r�--.:k;enled er no-t renewed? Yes _ No X If Yes, explai_ri in detail.
23, Have yeri ever individually, or with others, made application in any
pality for. an intoxicating liquor license and had such application denied?
Yes No x If so, wt*e and what were conditions of denial?
Ift
R ^ Ny-
Sa'�.1� L'CMin )
as.
C012ily CF Dakota .e F
Mar Mc ea , being first duly sworn upon his/her oath, eencses sr"i Y
says that helehe is the person who has executed the above Personal Information fczlm r
anrl that the stat---.ants made therein are true of /) r awn }ul ge """' b=lir-i.
Su.sc.ibed and aworn to bef-•,a
� N b1�8 ERT
me .this day o.* • � •, NOIA� SOT
MINNESOTA
297,0, �_a107MEA11fE1f�110I� _
My commission Expires May 19, 1951 ;'