The URL can be used to link to this page

02/17/1981 - City Council Regular AGENDA EAGAN CITY COUNCIL < REGULAR MEETING EAGAN, MINNESOTA CITY HALL FEBRUARY 17, 1981 6:30 P.M. I. 6:30 - ROLL CALL & PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE II. 6:33 - .ADOPT AGENDA AND APPROVAL OF MINUTES �.� III. 6:35 - PROCLAMATION - KELLY WEEK IV. 6:35 - DEPARTMENT HEAD BUSINESS '3 A. Fire Department P.3 C. Park Department P '3 B. Police Department g D. Public Works Department p V. 6:55 - CONSENT ITEMS [One (1) Motion Approves All Items] C10 A. 1981 Rate Schedule - consulting Engineering Services ,13 B. 216B, Mallard Park 1st ; 2nd & 3rd Streets - 'Final Payment/Acceptance N3 C. 79-6, Thomas Lake Trunk Storm Sewer Outlet - Final Payment/Acceptance e�3 D. 80-14, Rahn Addition Utilities - Final Payment/Acceptance ej4 E. Project 324, Receive Report/Order Public Hearing for Safari at Eagan Streets & Utilities ?,14 F. Change Order #4, 79-21 (Lakeside Estates, Saddlehorn Addition & Overview Estates Streets) TA G. Project 329, Receive Feasibility Report/Order Public Hearing (Cedar Cliff 2nd Utilities & Streets) f'K H. Ridgecliffe Additions - Grading Bond Reduction VI. 7:00 - PUBLIC HEARINGS e,l� A. Rezoning of 29 Parcels to Public Facilities Zoning (Zoning Map Update) VII. OLD BUSINESS ,p .\'IA. Barrel Reconditioning, Inc., for a Variance from the Front Set- back Requirements & Asphalt Surfacing for a parking Lot & a Conditional Use Permit to Allow Outside Storage for Lots 17-18-19, Block 2, Eagandale Center Industrial Park No. 4, Section 11 EACAN CITY COUNCIL ACENDA February 17, 1981 Page Two VIII. NEW BUSINESS 1� A. Pilot Knob Associates for Preliminary Plat Approval for Pilot Q Knob Center and Concept Approval, located in the Sk of the NWk of Section 15, located East of Pilot Knob and North of Crestridge B. Arthur R. Shields for Rezoning from A, Agricultural, to R-1, P Residential Single District , and for Preliminary Plat Approval of Tara Court located in the NW4 of the NWk of Section 10, located located East of Pilot Knob Road and South of Lone Oak Road f.Arl C. Brandt Engineering for Rezoning from A, Agricultural, to R-1 , \ Residential Single District , and for Preliminary Plat Approval of Dineen Addition, located in the NE'k of the SW4, lying easterly of the Center Line of Dodd Road and Southerly of Lakeside Estates, Section 25 .""45D. Thomas W. Heiberg for Rezoning from A, Agricultural, to P.D. , QPlanned Development District , and Preliminary Plat Approval of Galaxie Park Addition, located in the E' of the NWk of Section ,32, located South of Cliff Road and West of Galaxie- Avenue 6� E. J.I. Case Co. for a Variance to Exceed the 35% Lot Coverage Requirement in an Industrial Zoning District located in the SWk of NWk of Section 2, located East of Lexington Avenue and South of T.H. 55 F. Developers Construction, Inc. , for Temporary Advertising Sign, � located in the SW Corner of Cliff Rd. & Galaxie Avenue IX. ADDITIONAL ITEMS A. Establish a Public Hearing to consider I.R. Financing for Pilot ' Knob Shopping Center in the amount of $5,500,000 for March 17, 1981 X. VISITORS TO BE HEARD (For those persons not on the agenda) XI. ADJOURNMENT I J 0 0 MEMO TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCILMEMBERS FROM: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES DATE: FEBRUARY 13, 1981 SUBJECT: AGENDA INFORMATION MEMO After approval of the February 3, 1981 City Council minutes and the agenda for the February 17, 1981 City Council meeting, the following items are in order for consideration: PROCLAMATION - KELLY WEEK Ms . Lorraine Michael will be present at the City Council meeting to again request the proclamation for Kelly Week. A copy of the proclamation is enclosed on page 2. for your reference. Normally the Mayor and City Council take action authorizing the Mayor' s proclamation. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS MATTER: To authorize the Mayor' s proclamation of Kelly Week. j Proc(amation hereas, Kelly Services, Inc., was established over a quarter of a century ago, and Kelly Services has U provided much needed temporary help services, and Kelly Services has expanded into specialized areas of temporary help in marketing, light industrial, technical, clerical, and health care cervices, and Kelly Services has provided leading firms in the entire city of and surrounding areas with bigbest quality temporary help and guaranteed service, and Kelly Services has Provided employment for countless citizens not available for full-time jobs: Now, therefore, I - , Mayor of the city of _ __ do bereby proclaim March 9 tbrougb March 15, 1981 as KELLYWEEK, in honor of all dedicated Kelly Services employees in this city. Mayor Agenda Information Memo February 13, 1981 Page Two hEmn FIRE DEPARTMENT A. Fire Department -- There are no items to be considered for the Fire Department at this time. POLICE DEPARTMENT B. Police Department -- There are no items to be considered for the Police Department at this time. PARK DEPARTMENT C. Park Department -- Item #1: LAWCON Application At the last regular meeting of the-_Wdvisory Parks and Recreation Committee , held on February 5, 1981 ) potential LAWCON applications for the City' s . park system were reviewed. Please refer to the attached memorandum written by Director of Parks and Recreation Vraa. As stated in the memorandum, it is the recommendation of the Advisory Parks & Recreation Committee that an application be submitted to the state for funding development of the recently purchases Rahn Park expansion. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS MATTER: To either approve or disap- prove preparation of preliminary grant application for the develop- ment of Rahn Park. IWTIVM419i Matching funds . if the grant application is awarded would be available through a special levy or , the Park Site Fund. A determination should be made at the time the park grant applica- tion is awarded as to the method of funding the City' s portion of this project. 3 • February 11, 1981 i MEMO TO: CITY ADMINISTRA'IOR IiEDClES FROM: KEN VRAA, DIRECTOR OF PARKS $ RECREATION RE: LAWCON GRANT APPLICATION FY 1982 At the Advisory Parks and Recreation Committee meeting of February 5th, staff reviewed with the Advisory Committee potential LAWCON applications for the parks system. At that meeting the Advisory Committee, along with staff, identified several of the park sites which could be potential LAWCON applications for either additional acquisition or park develop- ment. After review and discussion, the Advisory Committee concurred with staff' s recommendation that Rahn Park, to include the additional acreage now being acquired, be the next application for financial assistance of the City of Eagan for a development grant. Further, the Advisory Parks Committee was in agreement and recommended that technical assistance which may be required in preparation of the grant, be provided by either the City's planning consultant or through the consulting firm currently being sought for Ridge Cliffe Park. At this time concept plans for the potential development of Rahn Park have not been prepared or developed. However, the development of the Rahn Park facility has been designated as one which would include develop- ment of athletic fields. Development of such facilities would be extensive and expensive and, therefore, the grant would be written for the total grant maximum allowable or $200,000. Under current LAWCON funding this would mean that the City of Eagan would be responsible for 250 of that cost or $50,000 should the grant application prove successful. The x preliminary application is due, tentatively on May 1, 1981. If the grant is ultimately approved, the City could not expect approval until mid to late 1982. Action to be taken: To either approve or disapprove of the preparation of a preliminary grant application for the development of Rahn Park; and to identify the potential source of matching funds. 1 • 0 Agenda Information Memo February 13 , 1981 Page Three Item #2 : Equipment -- (a ) Bids were received for the purchase of a seven gang reel mower. The low bidder was Minnesota Toro in the amount of $19,069 . This bid amount includes the mower and related equipment . (b) Bids were received for a mid-sized economy station wagon. The low bidder was Bloomington Chrysler-Plymouth for a Chrysler LeBaron in the amount of $6 ,836 . (c) Bids were received for a weed sprayer. The low bidder was ' Menning Manu- facturing in the amount of $2 , 750. An alternate bid for additional items was considered in the amount of $687 . Therefore the total bid is $3,437 . All three bids are within the amounts approved for budgetary expenditures in 1981 . For additional information on the three pieces of equipment, please refer to the attached memorandum, found on pages through . 07 . ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS MATTER: To approve or deny the three ( 3 ) low bidders for the purchase of three ( 3 ) pieces of equip- ment . • • February 12, 1981 MEMO TO: _ TOM HEDGES, CITY ADMINISTRATOR FROM: KEN URAA, DIRECTOR OF PARKS $ RECREATION RE: BID ITEMS At the January 6, 1981 Council meeting, the Council authorized staff to proceed with the advertisement and solicitation of bids for four pieces of equipment for the Parks and Recreation Department. Bids were opened on February Sth for two pieces and February 12th on the third. Bid opening for the 3/4 ton truck/plow is scheduled for February 26th. Funding for all equipment is pro- vided for in the 1981 operating budget or financed through equipment certifi- cates. 7 Gang Mower and Related Appurtenances: Specifications were drafted and mailed to four known bidders, and an advertise- ment was placed in the official paper, as per procedures. The specifications allowed for a demonstrator unit to be bid, provided all warranties were in full force and effect. staffwas aware that such a unit, was available, as City crews were permitted to use a new unit for trial purpose in the summer of 1980. Bids The City has received two bids for the Gang Mower as follows: 1) Minnesota Toro Inc; Plymouth, Mn $19?069.00 2) A.F.T. Sales; Anoka, Mn 27,351. 00 Both bidders have submitted valid bids and have met minimal specification requirements. Recommendation: That the City proceed with the purchase of the Gang Mower, and related equipment at a cost of $19,069.00 from Minnesota Toro. This cost is approximately $3,000 less than anticipated for this equipment, and represents a very attractive bid. Mid-size Station Wagon: Staff reviewed the functional use between the L.U.V. trucks and mid-size Station Wagon for departmental and City needs. During this review, it became apparent that it would be best to proceed with the biddingf amid-size Station Wagon. Minimum bid requirements were drafted and senttofourteen dealers representing the various auto manufacturers. Bids The City has received six price quotations. All bids appeared to meet the minimum requirements. In evaluating each vehicle there is some difference; i.e. E.P.A. mileage, cargo space, number of passenger seating, which effect the over-all value and utility of the vehicle. (D The three lowest bids are as follows: Ford Fairmont $6,870.00 Chrysler Le Baron 6,836.00 Chevrolet Malibu 7,020.49 Analysis: All three vehicles meet the basic needs of the department and would be acceptable. The Chevrolet has a slightly higher E.P.A. mileage rating and a split-rear gate for better loading/unloading. Interior space is slightly better than Ford, but less than the Chrysler Le Baron. i Normal pricing of the Chrysler would be substantially higher than either j Ford or Chevrolet. At this time, however, the Chrysler Corporation is offering a 7% reduction on its sticker price. Ford had submitted a bid of $6,780. 00, however, this price was less a "fleet delete package" which is valued at $90.00, for a real base price of $6,870.00. Recommendation: Although the staff preference is for the Chevrolet, all three vehicles meet the minimum requirements, and because the base price of the Le Baron is $24.00 less than Ford and $184 less than Chevrolet, it appears that the award should go to the Chrysler Le Baron. i Chemical Sprayer: . Staff prepared and mailed seven specifications for a mobile sprayer unit and related equipment. In bidding the equipment, staff drafted specifications which would meet the practical limits and over-all usefulness required for the park system. The unit to be recommended meets current and near future needs. Application of liquid fertilizer, which isnot generally practical for a park system, does have its purpose. This unit can be used for this purpose when the need arises. In addition to the base unit, staff requested pricing on a sprayer hand gun, additional hose and regulator to complete the unit. Bids Three vendors returned bids, with the base bids as follows: Menning Manufacturing $2,750.00 Coffeys Power Equipment 3,095.00 Cushman Motor Co. 3,344.00 All units meet specifications and are of an acceptable quality. Menning Manufacruring returned the lowest base bid, as well as the lowest price for additional equipment, costing approximately $687.00. This total price is the $3,600 budgeted. Other bids total additions exceeded this amount. (Note: Menning Manufacturing has recently moved its plant from St. Paul to Eagan. And, its believed, for this reason has submitted an exceptionally good price.) Recommendation: To accept the base bid and related equipment as supplied by Menning Manufacturing. Agenda Information Memo February 13, 1981 Page Four PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT D. Public Works Department -- Items #1 : Well #2-Gas. Pump Engine Repair -- The City has experience3- engine -failure on the diesel engine pump for Well #2 . It appears that this failure is caused .by a leak in -the cooling system which affected the internal combus- tion compartment . The Public Works Department received a quotation to repair this from Ziegler Repair Service for the Caterpillar engine. It appears that the repair to this engine will run between $3,000 and $4, 300 depending upon the extent of damage after review of the engine when it is dismantled. Due to the need for a standby engine during the heavy summermonths and potential electrical storm failure, staff is proceeding with the repair of the gasoline engine unless directed otherwise by the City Council . This item is informative and does not require any action by the City Council . Item #2: Comprehensive Water & Sanitary Sewer Report Update - TFe o prehensive Water & Sanitary Sewer Reports were last reviewed and updated in 1976 . Due to the rapid growth that has occurred in the City of Eagan combined with new requirements of the MWCC and the recent completion of the Comprehensive Guide Plan of the City, it is timely that a review and update of these comprehensive plans be performed during 1981 . The Public Works Department has solicited quotations from the consulting engineering firms of Bones- troo, Rosene, Anderlik & Associates and Poltz, King, Duvall , Ander- son & Associates and has also reviewed cost quotations with neigh- boring communities pertaining to performing these comprehensive updates . The most favorable quotation and time schedule was received from Bonestroo, Rosene, Anderlik & Associates at an hourly rate schedule with a guaranteed cost not to exceed $22,000 for both 'reports combined. This cost would be funded out of the Utility Enterprise Fund. During the review of these comprehensive plans, a detailed analysis will be performed pertaining to the trunk area assessment rates based on anticipated costs to complete the system compared with the remaining aseessable acreage in the City. In the past, these base trunk assessment rates have been increased by an annual percentage equal to the construction cost index. This will now give the City staff the opportunity to properly review the complete system to determine equitable rates for the future. Therefore, the Public Works Department is recommending to the City Council that action be takenasfollows. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS MATTER: To .authorize the Public Works Director to have the consulting engineering firm of Bonestroo, Rosene,, Anderlik & Associates prepare an update to the Comprehensive Sanitary Sewer &Water Plans for the City of Eagan for an aggregate cost not to exceed $22 ,000. V Agenda Information Memo February 13, 1981 Page Five Item #3: Subdivision Bond Requirements -- The Public Works Depart- ment would like to receive consideration of possibly reviewing and revising several items required to be bonded as a part of the development agreements for subdivision approval within the City. Presently, the City requires the bond be submitted for 20% of the estimated cost of streets and utilities to be installed under City contract . Due to the fact that all items constructed under a City contracture assessed against the benefited properties , they become a direct liability against that property and, consequently, the requirement for bonding to guarantee payment of the first year assessments has "never had to be enforced. It provides a problem for staff in trying to keep track of the bonds and running special assessment searches as to their balance to date whenever bond reductions are . requested. A bond has never been called in order to pay the 20% guarantee for specific assessments . This has created a hardship for a few small developers (15 to 20 acres or less ) in being able to acquire sufficient financial guarantees in orde to obtain the necessary bonds or letters of credit to cover the special assessments that would be a liability of the property anyhow. This has been a direct reason why the Sunset Addition final plat never proceeded, and it is also creating problems for the developers of the Overview Estates replat. In the latter instance, the developer could not come up with the required letter of credit . Subsequently, the City has a hold on all building permits until the financial - guarantee of this 20% requirement can be met. The developer can not sell the lots for subsequent development by builders because of this restriction which precludes him from obtaining the necessary cash to pay the assessments that were recently levied. The Public Works Director and City Administrator feel the 20% requirement is not necessary and would like considera tion given to possibly eliminating this requirement on new subdivi- sions . Developers are also required to post a bond in the amount of 125% of the estimated cost of the following off site improvements : 1 . Boulevard Sod 2 . Boulevard Trees 3. Bituminous Driveway Approaches 4. Street Signs 5. Survey Monumentation 6 . Tot Lot 7. Landscaping 8. Hard Surface Parking Areas with Bituminous Curbing 9 . Grading/Erosion Controls/Restoration 10. Other Miscellaneous 9 Agenda Information Memo February 13, 1981 Page Six Several of these items appear to be unnecessary and require that the developer' s bond remain open ended until the very last lot has been built upon in that particular subdivision. An example in case would be the requirement for boulevard sod. This has been incorporated into the City' s street contract and boulevard topsoil and grass establishment is now performed as a part of the street construction and assessed to the property owners . Therefore, there is no longer a requirement for the developer to bond for this item. Another point is the requirement for bituminous driveway approaches . This bond has to "remain in effect until the last house is built in a subdivision due to the fact that the developer- will not put in the bituminous boulevard driveway on a vacant lot without knowing where the future driveway is to be located depending upon the type of house constuction. Another point is the street identification regulatory sign requirement. The City would like to incorporate this as a requirement of the street construction contract to insure its uniform and timely installation. This cost becomes an obliga- tion of the street construction contract and will be assessed accordingly against the benefited properties . The bituminous parking lot with concrete curb and gutter is a requirement of the specific building permit and is required under the permit ' s issuance. To require a bond as a part of the development creates an excessive burden at the time of final plat approval rather than at the specific time of site plan approval for the particular facility. After review, - action would be in order for the City staff to modify the requirements for bonding at the time of final plat approval for the aforementioned information. There are seven ( 7) items on the agenda referred to as consent items requiring one ( 1 ) motion by the City Council . If there is any item which the City Council would like to discuss in further detail, that item should be removed from the Consent Agenda and placed under Additional Items unless the discussion required is brief. This will allow the Mayor to proceed with the Public Hearing as legally noticed at 7:00 p.m. 1981 ENGINEERING RATE SCHEDULE A. 1981 Rate Schedule for Consulting Engineering Services -- The City has received a request from Bob Rosene of the consulting engineering firm of Bonestroo, Rosene, Anderlik & Associates to implement a new rate schedule for 1981 services rendered. The attached schedule, found on page 12, , indicates the hourly rates requested and also compares them with t e rates presently in effect and shows their respective percentages increases . A survey was Agenda Information Memo February 13, 1981 Page Seven performed of other consulting engineering firms pertaining to their hourly services and the requested rates of Mr. Rosene are in line with other consulting engineering firms. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS MATTER: To approve the 1981 rate schedule for the consulting engineering firm of Bonestroo, Rosene, Anderlik & Associates . e 1981 RATE SCHEDULE CLASSIFICATION HOURLY RATE 1981 1980 % inc. Principal Eh gineer $37.00 34.00 8.8 Registered Engineer $33.00 30.00 10.0% Assistant Engineer (B.S.C.E. and/or E.I.T. ) $27.00 25.00 8.0% Senior Technician $22.00 20.00 10.00 Junior Technician $16.50 15.00 10.0% Clerical $12.50 12.00 4.0% Attendance at Regular Council Meetings $40.00/meeting-40.00 0 Reimbursable Expenses Reproduction, Printing, Duplicating At Invoice Cost Out-of-Pocket expenses such as meals, lodging, stakes, telephone calls, etc. At Actual Cost Mileage $ 0.20/mile 226a • • Agenda Information Memo February 13 , 1981 Page Eight 216 B B. Contract 216 B. Mallard Park 1st, 2nd and 3rd Addition Streets for Final Payment/Acceptance - The City has received certification from the consulting engineering firm that the above referenced contract has been completed in accordance. with the City' s plans and specifications. All inspections and tests have been performed and found acceptable . The final construction amount was 2 .6% over the revised contract amount due to an increase in gravel base required due to unstable soil conditions. This project has been assessed previously and final pay request has been taken into consi- deration during the _final assessment cost tabulation. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS MATTER: To authorize the seventh and final payment to Minnesota Valley Surfacing, Inc. , in the amount of $4,971 . 21 for contract 216 B and accept these streets for perpe- tual maintenance. CONTRACT 79-6 C. Contract 79-6, Thomas Lake Trunk Storm Sewer Outlet for Final Payment/Acceptance -- The City has received certification from the consulting engineering firm that the above referenced contract has been completed in accordance with the City plans and specifica- tions . All inspections, tests and restoration have been performed and found acceptable. The final construction amount of 3.88% over the revised contract amount due to additional rock stablization used for pipe bedding. This project was previously assessed for trunk area assessments. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS MATTER: To authorize the ninth and final payment to Nodlin Associates , Inc. , in the amount of $6 ,449. 91 for Contract 79-6 and accept this utility for perpetual maintenance. CONTRACT 80-14 B. Contract 80-14, Rahn Addition Utilities for Final Payment/Accep- tance -- The City has received certification from the consulting engineering firm that the above referenced contract has been com- pleted in accordance with the City plans and specifications. All inspections and tests have been performed and found acceptable. The City has received assurances from the contractor pertaining to minor miscellaneous clean up items and this work is guaranteed under his maintenance bond. Therefore, it is found to be beneficial to close out this contract and, at the present time, to allow for its final assessment. The final construction amount was 12 . 9% under the contract amount. This project has not yet been assessed and these final costs will be used in consideration of the final assessment cost tabulation. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS MATTER: To approve the fourth and final payment to C. W. Erickson in the amount of $3 ,471 . 11 for Contract 80-14 and accept these utilities for perpetual main- tenance . �' Agenda Information Memo February 13, 1981 Page Nine PROJECT 324 E. Project 324, Receive Report/Order Public Hearing (Safari at Eagan Streets and Utilities) - At the November 18,1980 City Coun- cil meeting, the City Council received a petition from the developer of the Safari at Eagan plat requesting a feasibility report for the installation of streets and utilities within that subdivision. This feasibility report has now been completed and is being pre- sented to the City Council for consideration. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS MATTER: To receive the feasibility report for Project 324 and order the public hearing to be held on March 17, 1981 . CONTRACT 79-21 F. Change Order #4, Contract 79-1 (Lakeside Estates, Overview Estates and Saddlehorn Addition Street Improvements) -- In order to complete these street improvements to the satisfaction of the City and the residents, the following additional work was required of the contractor over and above his contract obligations . Part A: In order to insure the safety of the traveling public, permanent reflectorized barricades were placed at the end of all dead end streets . (Add $686.25) Part B: To provide adequate driveway access and proper drainageo-certain critical homes in the Lake- side Addition and to provide miscellaneous site grading work in conjunction with obtaining the easement for the storm sewer outlet from the Overview Estates plat, additional work was required of the contractor. (Add $13774.75) The to-tal effect of these change orders provides for an addition of $2`,461 to -the contract. Since this project has already been assessed, this cost will have to be incurred by the City' s Trunk Fund. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS MATTER: To approve Change Order #4 to Contract #79-21 in the amount of $2,461 . PROJECT 329 G. Project 329, Receive Feasibility Report/Order Public Hearing (Cedar Cliff 2nd Utillities and Streets) -- At the January 20, 1981 City Council meeting, the City Council received a petition from the developer of the Cedar Cliff 2nd Addition plat requesting a feasibility report for the installation of streets and utilities within that subdivision. This feasibility report has now been completed ,and is being presented to' - the City Council for considera- tion. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS MATTER: To receive the feasibility report for Project 329 and order the public hearing to be held on March 17, 1981 . • Agenda Information Memo February 13, 1981 Page Ten RIDGECLIFFE ADDITIONS FOR GRADING BOND REDUCTION H. Ridgecliffe Addition for Grading Bond Reductions -- The City has received a request from Orrin Thompson Homes for a reduction in the grading bond for Ridgecliffe Addition from $50,000 to $25,000. The grading and excavation is approximately 85% to 90% completed while the restoration of boulevards is approximately 10% to 15% completer Therefore, in calculating the reduction factor for the grading bond, it is apparent that the grading permit is approxi- mately 50% complete,' assuming an equal balance for the bond amount between grading and restoration. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS MATTER: To approve the grading bond reduction for Ridgecliffe Additions from $50,000 to $25 ,000. REZONING OF PARK PROPERTY TO PUBLIC FACILITY ZONING A. Rezoning of 29, Parcels to Public Facility Zoning (Zoning Map Update) -- The City Planner, with some assistance from the Admini- strative Interns, has completed a comprehensive study of the zoning map. During the past several years , there have been in excess of eighty subdivisions within the City. The City has requested land dedications for park or public purposes as a part of the platting requirements in many of these various, plats . The parcels have therefore been dedicated to the City for public purpose. However, the zoning on many of these parcels was never changed to public facility zoning and therefore still reflect the zoning that was in the proposed development. In order to accurately reflect the parcels which have been dedicated to the City, the City must rezone these parcels to P. Public Facilities District, in orde to accurately show these parcels on the official map (zoning map) . The City Planner has found twenty-nine parcels which need to be rezoned to Public Facilities District . These twenty-nine parcels were legally noticed as a public hearing to consider a rezoning for this meeting. The parcels as prepared by the City Planner are listed as follows : 15 a • 1 Agenda Information Memo February 13, 1981 Page Eleven NAME SECTICN APPROX. LEGAL 1 1. Lexington Park 2 NW4 of SWk 2. Coachman Park 9 V4 of SWI 3. Gopher Eagan Park 13 N4 of Sfn;4_ 4. Debora Park 15 SF% of NFh 5. Pilot Knob Heights 2nd 15 Outlot A S' of S10; 6. Pilot Knob Heights 4th 15 Outlots ABCDE SFh of SW4 7. Duckwood Trail 15 Trailway N4 of Sh of NF% 8. Duckwood Estates 15 Trailway SW4 of NE4 9. Drexel Heights- 15 Cutlot ABCD SW; of S104- 10. Patrick Eagan Park 22 Wk of SV_4 11. Patrick Eagan Park 22 SFh of SWk of NFh- 12. Ek12. Northview Park 23 NFh- of 90 13. Lakeside Park 25 NW4 of SFh 14. South Oaks Park 25 SW- of SE4 15. C hes Mar Park 27 Outlot BC Mh of SF% 16. Wedgewood Park 26 Outlot ABE NEk of SO4- 17. 6017. Capricorn Park 26 SWI of NW4 18. Oak Pond 2nd 26 Outlot AB SEk of SE4 19. Oak Chase Park 27 NW4 of SE4 20. Carlson Lake Park '27 SFh of NW4 21. Thomas Lake-Heine 28 Trail NW4 of NFh 22. '.Thomas Lake-Lake Park 28 W4 of SE4 23. Eden 29 Outlot C NW4 of SE4 24. Rahn Park- 30 Outlot D N94 of SE4 25. Thompson Park 32 S4 of NEk 26. Johnny Cake 33 Outlot ABC W4 of NW4 27. Dakota CountyPark 35 E� z Of SEk 28. Hilltop Estates 35 Outlot A SWk of NEk 29. Highline Trail From Nicols to Pilot Knob The City Planner has reviewed all these parcels as they relate to each of the preliminary plats and finds all the parcels to be in order for rezoning consideration. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS MATTER:. To approve or deny the rezoning of all twenty-nine parcels to Public Facility Zoning to assure accuracy on the City' s zoning map. i I6 0 Agenda Information Memo February 13, 1981 Page Twelve BARREL RECONDITIONING A. Barrel Reconditioning, Inc. , for a Variance from the Front Setback Requirement and Asphalt Surfacing for a Parking Lot and a Conditional Use Permit to Allow Outside Storage -- A public hearing was held by the APC at their last regular meeting held on January 27 , 1981 to consider applications for a variance to front setback requirements and asphalt surfacing for the parking lot and a conditional use permit to allow outside storage for lots 17 , 18 , and 19 , Block 2 , Eagandale Center Industrial Park No. 4 for Barrel Reconditioning. This item was first heard by the Advisory Planning Commission at the December 23 , 1980 APC meeting. At that time, additional information was required by the APC and also a request for a conditional use permit for the outside storage was to be considered. This matter was placed on the City Council agenda for the February 3, 1981 meeting; however, the applicant was not present and, therefore, this agenda item was continued until the February 17 , 1981 meeting. The APC is recommending approval of the variances and conditional use permit to the City Council ; and for additional information on this matter, please refer to the City Planner's report , a copy was enclosed on pages 81 through- 91 of the February 3, 1981 City was, packet For a copy of the action taken by the APC, please refer to page ISThere was also an advertising brochure which was provided to each member of the City Council that has pictures and an explanation of the Barrel Reconditioning operation. This brochure was distributed with the last City Council packet. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS MATTER: To approve or deny the recommendation of the APC to approve the variance and conditional use permit for Barrel Reconditioning. 1-7 APC Minutes January 27, 1981 BARREL RECONDITIONING, INC. -- VARIANCE AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT The Vice-Chairman convened the next public hearing regarding the application of Barrel Reconditioning, Inc. , for a variance from the front setback requirements and asphalt surfacing for a parking lot located on Lots 17, 18 and 19, Block 2, Eagandale Center Industrial Park No. 4. Mr. ` Jim .Jordan, president of Barrel Reconditioning, Inc., appeared for the applicant and made a limited presentation of the application request due to the fact that this matter had been before the Commission previously. Member Wilkins discussed an inspection visit performed by herself, City Planner Runkle, City Administrator Hedges, and others, and reported that the operation appeared to be well designed and that the facilities for control of hazardous wastes, for which the Commission expressed great concern, appeared to be adequate and that there would be very limited amounts of hazardous wastes resulting from the Barrel Reconditioning process. It was noted that the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency has classified the business as non-hazardous in its operation. There was discussion about the timing of the asphalt surfacing for the parking lot. Mr. Jordan indicated that,upon further examination of the cost of installing the asphalt surfacing, it now appeared that such surfacing could be installed as soon as the construction season began. Wilkins moved, Bohne seconded the motion, to recommend approval of the application for a 15-foot variance from the front setback line for the parking area and also for asphalt surfacing of the parking area upon the con- dition that said surfacing be completed within a period of one year. All voted in favor. The Commission next considered the application of Barrel Reconditioning, Inc. , for a conditional use permit to allow outside storage for Lots 17, 18, and 19, Block 2, Eagandale Center Industrial Park No. 4. Member Krob requested clarification as to the size of the Black Hili Spruce which were intended to be installed as a portion of the proposed landscaping. Mr. Jordan indicated that the spruce would be 5-6 feet tall and would be purchased at an initial cost of approximately $150 per tree. The trees would therefore be as tall as the fence to be constructed. Hall moved to recommend approval of the conditional use permit to allow outside storage, Wilkins seconded the motion, all voted in favor, subject to the following conditions: 1. The storage does not exceed the 6-foot high fence. 2. Dust control measures shall be used on the storage area. 3. If and when development occurs to the east of the proposed facility, that the owner shall submit a landscape plan to the City and provide landscaping acceptable to the City on the east lot line of the property. U Agenda Information Memo February 13 , 1981 Page Thirteen PRELIMINARY PLAT. -. PILOT. KNOB CENTER A. Pilot Knob Associates for Preliminary Plat Approval for Pilot Knob Center and Concept Approval -- An application was submitted for preliminary plat entitled Pilot Knob Center which consists of approximately 50 acres and contains nine ( 9) lots and one ( 1 ) outlot. The second application was submitted for a detailed site plan approval for the first phase of the community shopping center. This request is similar to the request which came before the City Council during December 1980. The plan has been revised; however,. the request for rezoning the property owned by Pilot Knob Associates to the east of the proposed shopping center is not under considera- tion at this time. The Advisory Planning Commission is recommending approval of the preliminary plat and site plan approval . For addi- tional information on the matter, please refer to the City Planner' s report, a copy of which is enclosed on pages 'L Othrough 'A0 , . For a copy of the larger scale preliminary plat of Pilot KroO enter, please refer to the plat in the side envelope of your packet labeled "PLAT # 1". There has been correspondence on behalf of the Hillcrest Deveropment which owns approximately 6.0 acres north of the proposed Pilot Knob Center. For a copy of this corres- pondence, please refer to pages 3 V through 35' . A copy of the APC action- regarding the Pilot KnobCenteris enc-used on pages 34, through . 37 ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS MATTER: To approve or deny the recommendation of the Advisory Planning Commission to approve the preliminary plat and site plan approval for Pilot Knob Center. CITY OF EAGJAN SUBJECT: PRELLyINARY PLAT AND SITE PLAN APPROVAL PILOT KNOB -CENNTER APPLICANT: PILOT KNOB ASSOCIATES - R014 KRANK LOCATION: S' OF THE Nth, SECTION 15 EXISTING ZONING CSC (CONfi`1UNITY SHOPPING CENTER TIER DISTRICT) DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: JANUARY 27, 1981 DATE OF REPORT: JANUARY 20, 1981 REPORTED BY: DALE C. RUNKL.E, CITY PuIZTER APPLICATION SM1ITTED An application has been submitted for a preliminary plat, Pilot Knob Center, which consists of approximately 50 acres and contains 9 lots and 1 outlot. The second application submitted is for detailed site plan approval for the first phase of a Cormunity Shopping Center. BACK(MUND In November and December, Pilot Knob Associates were before the Advisory Planning Cormssion and the Eagan City Council for approval of a rezoning preliminary plat and detailed site plan. The City Council denied the application because Outlot B was the area being requested for rezoning from residential multiple to corrunity shopping center district. The Council at that time did not want to grant the zoning on that parcel. Other concerns brought forth were there was no public access to lots 1, 2, 3 and 4 of,Block .2 and the Council was also concerned about the alignment of Duck-wood Drive. Since the time it was denied, there has been a joint between the Advisory Planning Commission and the Eagan City Council to discuss the Cor)rehensive Guide Plan and direction of how to use the land-use map. At the January 13th meeting, the City Council had indicated that there will be no changes to the land-use map. However, this particular parcel, which is identified as Outlot B, would stay desig- nated on the Comprehensive Guide Plan as Cor unity Shopping Center District, but as to when the zoning would occur would depend on the timing and the plans are submitted for this area. Pilot Knob Associates has resubmitted an application which is being processed at this tine. M-1�ENNTS - PRELL UMMPY PLAT The preliminary plat consists ofapproximately 54 acres and contains 9 lots and 2 outlots. The applicant is not proposing to develop Lots 1-4 of Block l at this time. Dots 1-3, Block 1 are presently zoned Com-xuty Shopping Center. . Lot 4 is zoned residential multiple. The applicant is proposing to plat the c:orr ercial lots at this tine with the intent in mind that Lot 4 will have to retain the ponding area to provide for the shopping center. Lot 4 is not proposed to be built on until such time the property is zoned for a commercial use. Lots 1-4 of Bloc!: 2 are also not intended to be built on at this time. However, Lot 5 of Block 1 will contain the first phase of the shopping center. Outlot A is proposed for road right-of-way and Z.b . i CITY OF EACAN PILOT KNOB ASSOCLATES JANUARY 27, 1981 PACE TWO Outlot B is the area which is presently zoned Residential Multiple and will not be developed at this time. The plat also shows a 50-foot right-of-way to provide public access to Lots 1-4, Block 2. DETAILED SITE PLAN The applicant is also requesting detailed site plan approval of the first phase of the Corr=ty Shopping Center District. The detailed plan is located on Lot 5, Block 1, Pilot Knob Center. Lot 5, Block 1 contains 14.2 acres. The proposed shopping center contains 104,948 square feet for a lot coverage of 16.90. The park- ing area requirement for this shopping center would be 558 parking spaces. The ap- plicant is providing 636 spaces which is in excess of the parking requirement. All stalls are 10 x 20 dimension. The proposed site plan meets all setback requirements and ordinance recquiranents of 52. The only exception would be the public access which is being dedicated on the westside of the plat which would provide access to Lots 1-4, Block 1. The applicant is dedicating a 50-foot x 100-foot area which will provide public access to the lots 1-4. The City is expecting the shopping center to maintain this access and provide snowplowing and all essential maintenance as- pects of this road. However, if the shopping center does not maintain this road in the future, since it is a dedicated public street, the City will then maintain this street and assess it to all areas. Therefore, suitable access should be obtained for Lots 1-4 at anytime in the future. Basically, the entire concept is the same as was presented before. However, the applicant is not requesting to rezone Outlot B at this time. However, the ponding areas, Duckwood Drive and everything else is the same as was presented. Hopefully, the applicant has taken the concerns of the City into mind in this revised prelimi- nary plat. If the plat is approved, it should be subject to the following conditions: j 1. The parking area shall be surfaced, and concrete curbing shall be provided in areas where parking will not be expanded. 2. The plat shall be subject to Dakota County Plat Comnissicn and Minnesota Department of Transportation's review and camient because the plat abuts County and State rights--of-way. 3. A detailed landscape plan shall be submitted showing size, quantity and specie of vegetation being planted. The plan shall also include areas which will be sodded and seeded. This plan shall be approved by the City_ staff prior to final plat approval. 4. Detailed lighting plan shall be approved by the City staff. 5. An adequate landscape bond shall be retained and not released until one year after the landscaping has been completed. 6. A pedestrian circulation plan shall be approved by City staff prior to final plat approval. 7. All other carmrcial buildings in the center shall carry the same archi- tectural theme as the first phase of the cammercial ccr lex. 2 } CITY OF EAGAN PILOT KNOB ASSOCIATES JA:VU?1RY 27, 1981 PAGE ThT= 8. The City shall approve each phase of development prior to issuance of a building permit. 9. All ordinance requirements shall be net for all lots in the shopping center area with the exception of the setback recndrements on the platted street to service Lots 1-4, Block 1. 10. The applicant shall ins-.all a pedestrian walkway to the center to the north if and when the center develops. This pedestrian walkway shall be approved by the City staff. 11. Iten and if the area to the north develops, the aonlicant will be expected to construct Dem-ark Avenue north of Duckwood Drive and also install any other access which would be required by the City. DCP/jac 22 TO: ADVISORY PT_'NNING COt?4ISSION, C/O DALE C. RUN=, CITY PLANNER FROM: THOMAS A. COLBERT, DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC ICRKS DATE: JANUARY 22, 1981 RE: PR=1INARi Y PLAT - PILOT KNOB C12VrI'EIt All eormients contained in my report dated November 20, 1980, for the November 25th Advisory Planning Cotra~lissicn fleeting still apply to the preliminary plat of Pilot Knob Center. However, when this was considered before the City Council at their December 16th Council Meeting, there was some discussion pertaining to the degree of curvature of the proposed alignment of Duckwood Drive between Pilot Knob Road and Denmark Avenue. The d%ree of curvature proposed in front of the shopping center is approximately 7.5 . This degree of curvature provides for a maximum design speed of 45 mph. The degree of curvature for the alignment of Duckwood Drive as it enters Dennark Avenue is approximately 10.50. This provides for a max miL n design speed of approximately 40 mph. The current City policy pe—taining to collector roads provides for a maxinnrn posted speed limit of 35 mph. The pro- posed degree of curvature of this alignment is well within the anticipated design speeds .of this roadway. The engineering department feels that the degree of cur- vature proposed would be beneficial in minimizing any potential speed problems which is desirable due to the anticipated volumes of pedestrian and vehicular turning movements along this section of Duckwood Drive. I will be happy to dis- cuss the technicalities and details of the engineering departr�ent's anal�isis in review of this proposed alignrent and degree of curvature at the Planning Com- mission Meeting of January 27, 1981. Respectfully submitted, .00� Thcras A. Colbert, P.E. Director of Public 1%brks TAC/jac 2� TO: ADVIOORY PLA.,;'.:NG COL"_AISSION, C/O DALE C. FUNKLE, C1-_Y PLANNER FRO11: THC11AS A. COLBERT, DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC `NORKS DATE: NOV_^'.GER 20, 1980 RE: PRELINII' AR'_' PLAT PILOT KNOB SHOFPING CENTER Public ,7orks Department has the following comments to offer for consideration for approval of the above-referenced preliminary plat: UTILITIES Sanitary sewer of sufficient size and depth to handle this proposed develcprent is readily available at the intersection of Duckwood Drive and Eenmark Avenue. It will have to be extended to the west along Duck•,,icod Drive to service this proposed development. Plater main of sufficient size and capacity is readily available at the inter- section of Krestwood Lane and Duckwood Drive and also at Denmark Avenue and Duckwood Drive. This "missing link" of trunk water main will have to be con- structed along the proposed alignment of Ducknood Drive in con unction •with the developrent of this plat. A sufficient internal water main distribution facility will have to be provided to insure adequate fire protection for this shopping center complex in addition to connections of future develo^meats with- in this proposed plat. GR 21NNG AND DRAINAGE This property is a continuous gentle slope from north to south. Trunk storm sewer facilities to handle this anticipated development are readily available at the intersectio of Duck-.rood Drive and Denmark Avenue. An internal story: water;sedi-entation pond will have to be c:nstructed within the limits of this proposed plat. The developer has indicated this ponding area to be located in the southea3t corner. Internal storm sewer laterals wi`h catch basins will have to be 2cnstructed along Duckwood Drive and within the internal parking lot to intercept surface run-off and direct it into the sedimentation pond from which it .vill enter the trunk storm sewer facilities ultimately draining into. Fish Lake. Fish Lake has recently had its controlled storm sewer outlet con- structed during the Sur^u_:er of 1980. STREETS Access -to this proposed plat will be provided by the connection of the "missing link" of Duckwood Drive between Krestwood Lane and Denmark Avenue. The align- ment proposed has been reviewed with staff, and the degree of curvature is satisfactory for anticipated volumes and speeds of Duckwood Drive. A sidewalk alonb the north side of Duck�rlood Drive will have to be constructed to provide pedestrian access to this proposed shopping center. The sidewalk construction will be a responsibility of this development. Future sidewalk construction ex- tending north from Duclk ood Drive will be provided as additional lots are developed. Because sf the anticipated traffic volumes venerated from this proposed use, a meeting was held with representatives of MhDOT and Dakota County Highway Depart meat pertaining to the impact on Pilot Knob Road, and also taking into considera- tion access to thi-, property during the construction of I-35E. Some temporary - A PREILIMILN:'J Y FLAT - PILOT KNOB SHOP:ING CENTER NOVH�'RER 20, 1980 PAGE TWO widening :rill have to be performed on County Road 31 at the intersection of Duck- wood Drive to provide for the appropriate turning lanes required to handle the anticipated traffic volumes for this proposed shonpir_g center until such t_7^e as I-35E interchange is completed. MnDOT personnel have indicated that durin,- t}a Surer of 1983, the permanent upgrading of Pilot Knob Road at the intersection. c' Duckrrood Drive will be completed. This temporary intersection improvement until the permanent construction by MnDOT will be the responsibility of this develcn- ment. EASE!!!-:NTS ASID RIGHTS-^F'NAY An 80-foot public right-of-way will have to be dedicated along the proposed ali^n- ment of Ducl:rrood Drive be tyreen Crestwood Lane and Denmark Aver_ue as+a part of the plat. A 75-foot half right-of-way will have to dedicated adjacent to Pilot Kncb Road.Sufficient drainage and ponding easements will have to be dedicated to in- corporate the proposed or.-site ponding/sedimentation pond. The limits of these pending easements will have to be defined after engineerinz calculations determine the required storage capacity. They will have to be dedicated prior to final plat. In addition, all typical common lot line drainage and utility easements will have to be dedicated. SITE PLAN The proposed development of the site for the sh-oping center has been reviewed and no problems are anticipated with its proposed layout. A sidewalk is recc=ended to be constructed from Duckwood Drive to the center of the shopping center complex along one of the proposed medians along the major entrance to provide pedestrian access from Du^krvood Drive to the shopping center. This should be constructed as a part of this development. I will be availacle to answer further questions regarding this propojal at the Planning COI:3'.liSsion Meeting of November 25, 1980. Respectfully submitted, '"nomas A. Colbert, P.E. Director of Public Works TAC/jac CITY OF EAGAN REZONIi1G, PREL .11114ARY PLAT, DETAILED SITE PLAN - PILOT KNOB CENTER NOVE?.BER 25, 1980 ENGINEERING RECOTIVENDATIONS 1. An 80-foot right-of-way will have to be dedicated for the proposed alignment of Duckwood Drive. 2. A sidewalk wi'l have to be constructed along the northside of Duckwood Drive as a responsibility of this development. 3. A sidewalk will have to be constructed from Duckwood Drive to the shopping center complex as a part of the responsibility of the development of the shopping center. 4. An on-site ponding/sedimentation pond will have to be constructed to a ponding capacity as determined by the Public `.'Yorks Department. 5. A 75-foot half right-of-way will have to be dedicated adjacent to Pilot Knob Road. 6. Temporary intersection improvements providing for the proper turn lanes will have to be constructed at the intersection of Pilot Knob Road with Duckwood Drive as a responsibility of this development. 26 • .I 1 It Ati L- Kv- tit r' ti �F ; 3 30 z Ll k e:'t t t =- .—�_ wwo�Rrp-ce•a_s i�.........L�..-+... — — ——— — — — — — �- _ -- r f-h► T r -�- { ' g F F' -� C� �_ • 5 1 (f�� >CkC • E e } • a � � � E • O • F o rn � Z n't O -C cl I CO 0 L I I I cF I I � CAS E c I /0 loo I z� O r+ RY � I I ;•m z :.': I is Z C M:m R �. .. _.�.... i 40" rn — - - 1 N. ■ �� w PILOT KNOB ROAD ---- I --- y .. \ \ z -T 0 x r s KRE TWS OOD�LANE = li/ L 0 till- •�� t �= ( Z 4 ( '1'1€ _ _ r N !may m41 a_ L ^ tl rn Z co.. S C DiSTPK• r.�.wr�r.+��Y..�:ii.-."i�►r�"rr�:i�l��L'.� ��r� ��rr�r� ZONE r— Y/ wir.u[swsTs,cT..,sI it Io Ll10, y 1 IM PIT r s DENMARK AVE O -t Ni N _ - CAI Cl it o�,�� O Fb = - _ •_ _ �____� z-1 / J4 — ;rr>>- r LAK .. :}:. n /.y[i�fSt�r•J�frl�'.il,'�/ ~ +'lit;, :'' t.. �' ' ~ �t'• j`� r. Y ,J^��1, (!`�;1. •�;� ,1.ir�.i;� ��;'�i!`•fr`'a �y--� ►-'1 �r � � ti � ,'.?G%71�� . . . . . . . . � �..•�r!/ � '1-, , �.}': 5:�f, .r 1 f 1, / ��-h r -tom.. .,. � •� - .•r. On .rt �'�=�• ;/�.rc7��'� ��. ��h..� 'X'"C'El' � �:• ••\•:• � �h:'.ti'•a � J?`I'i-: ice.;- r `i `: •}._ ( + .}.. ` ` • :. �?,'� f. 1•l..h r•�%r 111 •J�'i !/11 1 �- ,t•1�•t'S�.,�"'t. ,.•' . .'. .'.': . .� '.' :1 • . .•.;.;.;.;. 0 J�ti 1�ff:; 'j•"��,�r` ��J�f��tl'% r ./� ! tits{ /, �` II ,c��•� Ie 4211\* rjr- rl oo 1 �r.�. IIS' r '�r )r� ! �, � .�_ '�1�� 1 ) //•:� �•'• r- r r I. {'- / i1 :j. hit' `f r„� 1 f :�' YANKEE 000 LE ROAD Of SURREY-:. ENT .. .•:•:•'•:•:-. . r' ADD .. /��II tj I i(�I �� !� �,� /�/ '/ i ,. i � C.7t rr`r j� . i �Fi t Lim .CITY -'� 30 HOWARD DAHLGREN ASSOCIATES INCO QQORA'FC CONSULTING PLAN N ERS ON E GPO`/ E LAND T ERRAC E MItJtJEAPCILIS, MINNESOTA 55403 5-2.377-3535 22 January 1981 Members of the Planning Commission City of Eagan 3795 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, Minnesota 55122 .t RE: Proposed Pilot Knob Shopping Center Dear Planning Commission Members: As planning consultants to Hillcrest Development we have been reviewing the development potential of their sixty (60) ± acre site north of and adjacent to the Pilot Knob Shopping Center. The Hillcrest site will be substantially altered when Interstate 35E is built cutting diagonally across property, effectively removing all access from Pilot Knob Road and Yankee Doodle. Access will be gained- only from the yet to be platted and constructed Denmark Avenue. It is quite important that Denmark be constructed prior to the construction of Interstate 35E and most appropriately at the time of the Pilot Knob Shopping Center construction. In 1979 we were working with Super Valu and the JKR Company on the same Pilot Knob Shopping Center site and had several meetings with the City staff to discuss development parameters. On 25 October 1979 we met with John Voss and Dale Runkle. At that meeting it was expressed that the City would be looking for development which would work in a manner that tied vehicular and pedestrian traffic together so that there was a positive relationship between developments. The ideas brought forth were that of mutual pedestrian corridors connectinq maior shopping centers and a vehicular belt around the centers much as one would find at a regional shopping center. The combined commercial lands should operate much as a "downtown" would �;harinq common road ;systems. In particular, the City staff requested a road link on both the east and west ends of the center to jive access to the north thus connecting the two commercial areas into a cohesive devolopmont. This idea was fostered by the City and we expect it to be carriod out. Our original sketch (which is attached as Drawing "A") was r(-viowed with the Eagan City staff on 18 December 1971) and we pointed out that we had incorporated an access to the north on the west, side of the center. 3 ) Members of the Planning commission 22 January 1981 City of Eagan Page Two I 1 The Pilot Knob Shopping Center (attached as Drawing "B") before you for approvals has not provided that needed access to the north. We feel this is an important element that should not be eliminated. The simple j extension of the public street from Duckwood, which dead ends just shy of the Center, to the northern property line would fulfill the planning concerns expressed at previous staff meetings and would provide a reasonable point of-access for Hillcrest development. Thank you for your attention to this important detail. Sincerely, C. John Uban Howard Dahlgren Associates, Inc. CC: Gary Tankenoff Dick Haluptzok 3Z z .�.� N �► U • � T O _ o 1 _ o 53 LJ �f r ✓Ir til i ; t' + •w� t RtTl _ QZ 5E S i ; `• _ � � • �. u.` — � {--' T ! j I ..� ( !mac I +I ! + ( i I ;� ALL ix w t t u� v� w Q !I—!'}SII—� CL r 14 I I ! ! IILLA — -- OkA TT 4cr� 1109 1 i t cc W ao V WL I— Z y Q J CO) V m N ch Q J W J � �. O • I t0 ,� O c U. �"� o O \ °' •. a 3 �, O O _ •. acc 0 ---- — - _ W _ .--- 26'066 OVOU BONS KORSUNSKY KRANK ERICKSON ARCHITECTS, INC. ARCHITECTS • PLANNERS •INTERIOR DESIGN January 23, 1981 i Members of the Planning Commission City of Eagan 3795 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55122 Re: Pilot Knob Shopping Center Comm. No. 80-124 Dear Planning Commission Members: This morning we received in the mail , a letter from Howard Dahlgren Associates, Inc. , on behalf of Hillcrest Development regarding their concerns for access to their property from our shopping center site. As 1 stated publicly during our Planning Commission and City Council appearances, it would be mutually advantageous to us as well as Hillcrest Development, to explore the possibility of joint roadway access from our -site to theirs and vice versa. It is our intent to work with them to develop this access. We would expect also that Hillcrest at the same time, would provide us with a publicly dedicated access through their property as mutually convenient to our site as our public access -would be to theirs. We assure you of our cooperation in working out the details and would appreciate Planning Commission direction to Hillcrest in determining how they intend to provide access to our site. Yours very truly, KORSUNSKY KRANK ERICKSON ARCHITECTS, INC. i Ronald Krank, A. I .A. RK/dkj cc: Gary Tankenoff Lloyd Engelsma 3� Ken Applebaum Howard Dahlgren 570 GALAXY BUILDING 330 SECOND AVENUE SOUTH MINNEAPOLIS,MINNESOTA 55401 (612)339-4200 • PILOT KNOB CENTER PRELIMINARY PLAT AND SITE PLAN Vice-Chairman Hall then convened the public hearing concerning the appli- cation of Pilot Knob Associates for preliminary plat approval of Pilot Knob Center and for site plan approval. The proposed center is located east of Pilot Knob Road and south of Yankee Doodle Road. Mr. Mike Wertenen appeared for the applicant and explained that, due to City Council concern as to the present rezoning of 0utlot B, that the previous application for rezoning had been removed from consideration. There were concerns regarding the curvi- linear alignment of Duckwood Drive located within the plat, the suitability of the 550-foot access easement located on the westerly portion of Lot 5, Block 1, the extension of Denmark Avenue to the north, and whether sufficient changes had been made in the proposal to satisfy Council objections. City Planner Runkle stated that the applicant has discussed the proposed preliminary plat with the staff and has attempted to resolve all prior objections. City Engi- neer Bob Rosene discussed the location of Denmark Avenue, noting that its location has been established for a long period of time on the City's proposed street plan, and the' staff recommended that a 40-foot one-half right-of-way be obtained for Denmark Avenue at this time. Public Works Director Colbert indicated that the curvilinear alignment of Duckwood Drive is satisfactory for the proposed traffic speeds along this minor collector street in that the alignment would help to reduce speeds in this area. Mr. Wertenen stated that the applicants will continue to work with Hillcrest Development, the developer of the property immediately to the north of this development, to work out provisions for joint public access to both sites. After discussion, the following action was taken: 1. Preliminary plat. Krob moved to recommend approval of the revised preliminary plat, Bohne seconded the motion, all voted in favor, subject to the following conditions: A. The parking area shall be surfaced, and concrete curbing shall be provided in areas where parking will not be expanded. B. The plat shall be subject to Dakota County Plat Commission and Minnesota Department of Transportation's review and comment because the plat abuts County and State rights-of-way. C. A detailed landscape plan shall be submitted showing size, quantity and species of vegetation being planted. The plan shall also include areas which will be sodded and seeded. This plan shall be approved by the City staff prior to final plat approval. D. Detailed lighting plan shall be approved by the City staff. E. An adequate landscape bond shall be retained and not released until one year after the landscaping has been completed. , F. A pedestrian circulation plan shall be approved by City staff prior to final plat approval. R G. All other commercial buildings in the center shall carry the same architectural theme as the first phase of the commercial complex. 36 H. The City Council shall approve each phase of development prior to issuance of a building permit. I. All ordinance requirements shall be met for all lots in the shopping center area with the exception of the setback requirements on the platted street to service Lots 1-4, Block 2. i J. The applicant shall install a pedestrian walkway to the center to the north if and when the center develops. This pedestrian walkway shall be approved by the City staff. K. The applicant shall dedicate on the final plat a 40-foot half right-of-way for Denmark Avenue. L. When and if the area to the north develops, the applicant agrees to share the cost of construction of Denmark Avenue north of Duckwood Drive through the assessment of said costs. M. An 80-foot right-of-way shall be dedicated for the proposed alignment of Duckwood Drive. N. A sidewalk shall be constructed along the north side of Duckwood Drive as a responsibility of this development. 0. A sidewalk shall be constructed from Duckwood Drive to the shopping center complex as a part of the responsibility of the development of the shopping center. P. An on-site ponding/sedimentation pond shall be constructed to a ponding cpacity as determined by the Public Works Department. Knob Road.Q. A 75-foot half right-of-way shall be dedicated adjacent to Pilot R. Temporary intersection improvements providing for the proper turn lanes shall be constructed at the intersection of Pilot Knob Road with E Duckwood Drive as a responsibility of' this development. 2. Detailed Site Plan Approval. Krob moved to recommend approval of the � site plan for the proposed Pilot Knob Center, Wilkins seconded the motion, all members voted in favor. 4 t 37 Agenda Information Memo February 13, 1981 PageFourteen PRELIMINARY PLAT - TARA COURT B. Arthur R. Shields for Rezoning from A, Agricultural, to R-1 , Residential Single District, and for Preliminary Plat Approval of Tara Court -- A public hearing was held before the Advisory Planning Commission to consider two applications submitted by Arthur Shields at their last regular meeting held on January 27, 1981 . The first application submitted was to request a rezoning of approximately 4.15 acres from A to R-1 . The second application submitted requested_ preliminary plat approval of a plat entitled Tara Court consisting of approximately 4. 15 acres and containing three single family lots . Action was taken by the APC to recommend approval to the City Council . A larger scale copy of the pre- liminary plat as Mr. Shields is proposing f r consideration and adoption at this time is enclosed on page _ For a copy of the future plat illustrating how the property be developed in future years is shown on a larger scale drawing enclosed in the side envelope of your packet folder and labeled "PLAT # 2". Mr. Shields was encouraged by the City Planner to consider future platting before he chose the location to construct a new home for his son as stated in the. Planner' s report , therefore creating a future plat drawing. A copy of the City Planner' s report is en- closed on pagesthrough +S' for your information. For action that was ta�y the AP p ease refer to the APC minutes found on page _+� . ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS MATTER: To approve or deny the recommendation of the APC to approve- the rezoningand preliminary plat for Tara Court . 3$ Li Li >,� ►V C> RO AD CC-0.RR No \o) — YL-E`/'L—W YL -Z,/� Iz5.ISI 4- Zoc ,o9 SEC.•• \O� TZ7� �'.l 7L4 13t 124� ` 1 C � 0. ri Qs•,. t� Al.F 818 m - \BLOCK �-` _� -w - -av, - o -.. - - 89 ---__ __-- "_--.._ / /-�".� � AHA 14 Ago 8r4 1881 3 •-_�-' / 'tel / I e o l to 1 _EM AY S / now. s74-0 1 SouTN of N Yi-E YL NW VA. V-kWY4 SE-L. NO ou I / PP,EUMINRRY PLAT $; W - OF • TARA couRT CITY OF EAGAN SUBJECT: REZONING AND PREML�IINARY PLAT - TARA COURT APPLICANT: ARTHUR R. SHIELDS LOCATION: Mh OF THE NW; OF SECTION 10 t EXISTING ZONING: A (AGRICULTURAL) DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: JANUARY 27, 1981 DATE OF,REPORT: JANUARY 20, 1981 REPORTED BY: DALE C. 1JNIC.LE, CITY PIANNE.R APPLICATION SUBMITMD The first application submitted is a request to rezone approximately 4.15 acres frau A (Agricultural) to R-1 (Residential Single District) . The second applica- tion submitted is a request for preliminary plat approval which consists of approximately 4.15 acres and contains 3 single family lots. F CONT=S At the present time, there are two existing hares on the property which have ac- cess to Lone Oak Read. Mr. Shields presently lives in the home on the eastside of the property. He is planning to give his son the home that he is presently_ living in and would like to construct a new hcrm on the property. Nor. Shields has worked with the City staff on the best,way to subdivide the property in order to allow another house to be constructed. In working with the City staff, the staff suggested that he do an overall design to see how we could maximize his land in the future. Mr. Shields did consult an engineer to see has he could feasibly subdivide the property and maximize the use of the land. The first exhibit is a sketch plan which shows the maxir.m. use of the land showing that 6 lots could be provided which would have access from a cul-de-sac street. The street would meet the minimum requirements for a public street and all lots would be in excess of the 12,000 foot requirement. However, Mr. Shields did not want to subdivide the land in this fashion at this time. However, he has located his house on which could became Lot 4 of the Addition when platted in the future. The second exhibit is the preliminary plat, Tara Court, which contains 3 lots. Por. Shields would like to plat the property at this time with the three lots and, in the future, replat this parcel into the 6 lots like shown on the first exhibit. The 3 lots which are under consideration, Trots 1 and 2, contain approximately an acre and a half. Lot 3 is approximately .6 of an acre. Mr. Shields is proposing to build on Lot 2, which would have a 50-foot access to Ione Oak Road. At the present tire, this would only consist of a driveway to Mr. Shield's hone. However, as shown on the other exhibit, when the replat would occur a cul-de-sac could be put in to provide access to this lot. Since Mr. Shields only wants to construct one house, he would only like to plat the 3 lots at this tire. All lots exceed the minimum lot size re- quirement for a single family residential district. The City has also, in the pas allowed a 50-foot wide access to a public street or' a stove-pipe lot. However,tr_s wi l- CITY OF EAGAN AR= R. SHIELDS JANUARY 27, 1981 PAGE TWO only be a teuperary situation once the development occurs, the residential street will be constructed. If approved, the plat should be subject to the following conditions: 1. The. plat should be subject to the Dakota County Plat Cotm-tission's review and comrent because the plat abuts a County Road. 2. A park dedicatich'fee shall be required on the newly-created home. 3. All easenents shall be required per City staff's recommendation. 4. All houses shall be connected to sanitary sewer and water. DCR/jac ENGINEERING RDCCPM'iENDATIONS 1. A 55-foot half right-of-way must be dedicated adjacent to County Road 26 (Lone Oak Road) . 2. All outstanding trunk area assessments for sanitary sewer, water and storm sewer must be paid prior to final plat approval. i 3. A drainage easement must be provided to incorporate the 878.0 contour for 1 LeMay Lake. 41 • • TO: ADVISORY pi.;�.' VING COMN'IISSION, C/O DALE C. R3Iv'KI.E, CITY PLANNER FRCt1: THaIAS A. COLBERT, DIRDCTOR OF PUBLIC V40RKS DATE: JANUARY 22, 1981 RE: PRELIMINARY PLAT - T.ARA COURT (ART SHInD.S) Public Works Departr.ent has the following comments to offer pertaining to the proposed preliminary plat referenced above: UTILITIES Sanitary sewer and waterrlain facilities of sufficient size and depth are available adjacent to this plat. GRADING AND DRAINAGE Drainage for this proposed plat can be handled by surface runoff into LeMay Lake irriediately adjacent along the south portion of this property. Letlav Lake cur- rently has its controlled storm water outlet installed. With the future subdivi- sion of Tara Court, internal storm sewer catch basins will have to be installed to intercept street drainage directed to ikrMay Lake. STREETS The 'proposed subdivision of Tara Court into three lots at this time will lend itself to future subdivisions into the proposed six lots based on the configura- tion of the proposed plats submitted. The proposed future cul-de-sac length is well within City standards. EASUMENTS AND RIGHTS-OF-[%Y A 55-foot half right-of-way will be required to be dedicated adjacent to Lone Oak Road. A drainage easement must be dedicated to incorporate the 878.0 eleva- tion along the south portion of this proposed plat fc Le'yay Lake. Additional - eommon lot line drainage and utility easements will not be required at this time due to potential for future replatting to avoid the necessity of vacating these easements should future lot lines change under the proposed future reolat. The existing utility easement for the sanitary sewer line traversing across the south portion of this plat should be dedicated and shown on all future plats. OTHER This prcperty has not yet paid its trunk storm sewer area assessments and should be conditioned to do so prior to final plat approval. In addition, only a porticn of the trunk area water assessments have been levied on this overall parcel. The remainder of the trunk area utility assessments should be paid as a condition of this plat approval. I will be available to discuss in further detail any item pertaining to the above- referenced preliminary, plat at the Planning Commission Meeting on January 27. Respectf, ly submitted, Thomas A. Colbert, P.E. n;rcn+nr of A,ihi i r tvnrks Jit T�1 ` fly ! ♦ t i Litt 1if!llti ; te No .� o Z � � :: 1 : �: 1r11 :F :t i t � �► � 3 9 � a. r s ♦ t f t tiitts�a;: ; ° toe, ! ► �. iT , `j .w 1 r t J' Z _ 11 � i N y a 3 44 ---�� '�.•• .�•.� INN+ '� • •1J•�i' j , 1'qR` ''t •r'ti 4 � ell t�>,1'h IS•1{ f hili iiii ' / / ,Vt}� lN��1. ,• (. . .,j•F�,;. , .aii iiileer � / �/ {.._��fl� tS.••'••'• ;+. � It pp�� ? :��' Jrr::t�`Y,t�• tir yIr'Cr � .. r / `�1:•��' ''• '�y}/ .ti{:'A,•�r� ;rfr.•.•�:•" �+t/jtf• ��yS fr:-r tom• ��' _ t.�� .a. , .'Q�;r '�V;••h' t�.tir -�. '„ �r•��/�F r��'I�•,�f tl.�''�V . �� „� y /.;{;:.:: :�...;.. lr�tia��11�;. j� �a J j t ! a 4/ '`':•, r .ftp iii r \ft 1�r'l1• r if !; � i• i � �•: .ti .tir•. •w 1 • fJ 4 '! r i 1 / /r 1. ? { 1 a 1 1' 1 sirf�:• i � IN ti f. ti + 1� n/j:t.L1t , .�' ;;:; •� / / / — •r;r•Sri:•:!;: j: J-/ �j ;i: ��/ //� •:4 l� „rr�,lt�}�./�j% ,`,'! ,•� ' E//.'i//:' r/ / / �' _ �` .. t --- -:..�.- J tiff'"}r• IV '• { r�`. YANKEE 000 LE ROAD ..._.___ 6i ENT N • := t'FH ADD. % EfGHT$: t PM, / t : t1ii3� t �\\_ I +• d { :i i :tt �l' p fig• 1� f- t, .:. :: „. ,,.. T-7- Yx • TARA COURT REZONING AND PRELIMINARY PLAT The Vice-Chairman convened the next public hearing regarding the applica- tion of Arthur Shields for the rezoning and preliminary plat approval r for Tara Court located in the northwest quarter of the northwest quarter of Sec- tion 10 on Lone Oak Road. Mr. Ralph Wagner of Probe Engineering Company appeared for the applicant and indicated that the property consisted of ap- proximately 4.15 acres for which the present zoning category is Agricultural. The property is presently divided in two parcels and the proposal requires the rezoning to R-1, Residential Single District, and the subdivision of the property into three single family lots. City Planner Runkle indicated that the applicanthas worked with the staff to provide an overall design for further subdivision of this land in the future. Members expressed concern regarding the approval of an additional cul-de-sac and Public Works Director Colbert indicated that a cul-de-sac was necessary to serve this property considering the size of the parcel and the surrounding terrain. After discus- sion, the following action was taken: 1. Rezoning. Wilkins moved to recommend approval of the rezoning of the subject property, Krob seconded the motion, all voted in favor. 2. Preliminary plat approval. Hall moved to recommend the approval of the preliminary plat, Wilkins seconded the motion, all voted in favor, subject to the following conditions: A. The plat shall be subject to the Dakota County Plat Commission's review and comment because the plat abuts the County Road. B. A park dedication fee in the amount in effect the time of final plat approval shall be required on the newly created home. C. All easements required per City staff's recommendations shall be provided. D. All houses shall be connected to sanitary sewer and water. E. The plat shall incorporate the easterly line of the proposed cul-de-sac as the westerly line of Lot 3. F. A 55-foot half right-of-way shall be dedicated adjacent to County Road 26 (Lone Oak Road). G. All outstanding levied or pending trunk area assessments for sanitary sewer, water and storm sewer shall be paid prior to final plat approval. H. A drainage easement shall be provided to incorporate the 878.0 contour for LeMay Lake. 4-6 Agenda Information Memo February 13, 1981 Page Fifteen PRELIMINARY PLAT & REZONING. - DINEEN ADDITION C. Brandt Engineering for Rezoning from A, Agricultural , to R- 1, Residential .Single District, and Preliminary Plat Approval of Dineen Addition -- A public hearing was held to consider two ( 2) applications as submitted by Brandt Engineering The first applica- tion submitted was a request for rezoning 6 .2 acres from A to R- 1. The second application submitted was a request for a preliminary plat approval of ,.the Dineen Addition which consists of 6 .2 acres and contains seven ( 7) single family lots. Action was taken by the APC to recommend approval of both applications to the City Council . Enclosed on pages Ad through S3 is a copy of the City Planner's report. Enclose in the side envelope of your folder is a larger drawing of the proposed Dineen Addition preliminary plat which is labeled "PLAT# 3". Enclosed on page t is a copy of the APC minutes which references their acti--on- on these two applications . ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS MATTER: To approve or deny , the recommendation of the APC to approve the rezoning and preliminary plat of Dineen Addition. 4 -7 CITY OF EAGAN SUBJECT: REZONING AND PFMZ''INARY PIAT - DINEEJ ADDITIOtl APPLICANT: BRANDT ENGINEERING LOCATION: PART CF THE NE% Cr THE S64, SECTIM 25 EXISTING ZONING: A (AGRICULTURAL) DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: JANUAM 27, 1981 DATE OF REPORT: jANUAF& 20, 1981 REPORTED BY: DALE c. RUNxLE, CITY PLANNER APPLICATION SUBMI= The first application submitted is a request for rezoning 6.2 acres frau A(Agricultural) to R-1 (Residential Single District) . The second application submitted is a request for a preliminazy plat approval, Dineen Addition, which consists of 6.2 acres arra con- tains 7 single family lots. COMMENTS TTS The proposed development consists of 6.2 acres of which 2.73 acres are below the high water level. The 7 lots all exceed the 12,000 square foot requirement arra all meet the minm n setback requirements at a public street. The cul-de-sac is approximately 330 feet in length which is under the cul-de-sac length requirement for a public street. All setback requirements and ordinances are net with this proposed addition. Staff has looked at the possibility of looping the cul-de-sac into over-hill Farm Addition. How- ever, owever, the topography does not lend itself for this connection. Therefore, the cul-de- sac street is the most practical way to develop this parcel. If approved, the plat should be subject to the following conditions: 1. Cash dedication per lot shall be required for the 7 lots,. All ordinance require- ments shall be met. 2. All other City ordinances shall be met. DCR/jac a TO: ADVISORY PLANNI% OOlMISSION, C/O DALE C. RLWaE, CITY PIANNER FROM: THCMS A. COLBERT, DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS DATE: JANUARY 22, 1981 RE: PRE UNARY PLAT - Dr= ADDITION Public Niorks Depart hent has the following CmTrents to offer pertaining to consider- ation of the above-referenced proposed preliminary plat: LT niTIESS Trunk sanitary sewer and watermain facilities of sufficient size and depth are readily available within the Dodd Road right-of-ray. Internal laterals will have to be installed with the development of this plat to service the individual lots. It is anticipated that the trunk sanitary sewer will extend across and parallel to the northern property line of this proposed plat on the scuthside of Hay Lake to service the South Oaks Addition and Section 36 south of Cliff Road. GRADING AND DRAINAGE The general slope of this property provides for surface drainage directly into Hay Lake on the northside of this plat. The proposed grade submitted for the street are within the allowable guidelines. However, the proposed grading along the northside of the cul-de-sac does not neet the required 3:1 standards and encroaches within the high water elevation of Hay Iake. Consequently, this cul- de-sac will have to be shortened and the grades adjusted to eliminate any en- croachnmt below the 910.0 elevation of Hay Lake; and either terracing will have to be performed or a 3:1 slope will have to be provided for to this elevation. Due to the existing and proposed grades of this property, the configuration of - the cul-de-sac will have to be revised frau that submitted dated 10-24-80. EASEP'D 'I'S AND RIGHTS-OF-VM Sufficient right-of-way has previously been acquired for the recently inproved f trunk sari .sewer al the Dodd Road. However, with the extension o the tart' orxJ northern portion of this property combined with the existing Hay Lake, a drainage and utility easement will have to be dedicated along the northern portion of this plat incorporating 911.0 elevation. The City staff, through its consulting firm, is presently working on the alignment for the proposed trunk extension of the sanitary sewer. The exact easement required for this trunk extension of the sanitary sewer cannot be accurately determined until nore precise detailed infor- mation is provided pertaining to the legal description and boundary survey for this proposed plat as it conforms with the existing elevation. In any event, a drainage easement will be required to incorporate the 911.0 elevation for Hay Lake. I will be available to discuss in further detail these items at the Planning Cam- mission Meeting on January 27. Respectfully sutadtted, Zl=w A. Colbert, P.E. 4 ( Director of Public Works a mpic/iac CITY CSF' EAGAN DINEEN ADDITION JANUARY 27, 1981 PAGE TWO ENGINEERING REATICNS 1. A drainage easement must be dedicated to incorporate the 911.0 elevation for Hay Lake. 2. A utility easement must be dedicated to incorporate the required extension of the trunk sanitary sewer along the southside of Hay Lake. 3. configuratim of the proposed plat must be revised to insure that there is proper 3:1 slopes and that no encroachment of fill material is required within the 910.0 elevation. TAC/jac 60 u • •� 1.•' �.. j i ;} Ft 7S}•_ } >� F{.l`k�;.i• f�. ��.'e Ta�,,, � 'd � a 'Z 'V� � ..`.r � IL } t i e t c� ff 6 }i:-f f#1 //i 1 ✓ wo • 1.; •�: / 1 , ;• , s�-.-: : ==ice;.:• ��. Ir IA • f a / r its w � a"1 ••;;;'/ i m N — 1 # U) N r • R r t r 3 �. rte _s_ t • r lz� , �' ` sty `i�. 1 • ;Pop rn rrlrrl �— ,: 30 1p z � 2 mo[i• y ti �_ .. i y , ISE cn — rn a r � S r t*� _ Q C. S. A. H. ik 30 ' 1 AUDITOR'S SUBD. N0. 42 t SADDLE HORN •1 ol J �,, { t.•R 1 `;�•�•: ...'9�.^11%�e��••�� l � � 'i 4 fig" �.� �1-. \\ . .�j� .I_��:).tel JL�'• 1 C7 �..-._ �^� - ��.� � f1�1 DNM ADDITION REZONING AND PRELDUNAR7 PLAT The Vice-Chairman then convened the public hearing concerning the appli- cation of Mr. Michael Dineen for the rezoning of approximately 6.2 acres from Agricultural to R-1, Residential Single District, and for preliminary plat approval of Dineen Addition which would contain seven single family lots. Mr. Ray Brandt of Brandt Engineering appeared for the applicant and described the proposal. There were no objections from residents and Public Works Director Colbert discussed the need for a sanitary sewer easement along the south side of Hay Lake and the need for proper 3:1 slopes with no encroachment of fill material within the drainage area of Hay Lake. After discussion, the Planning Commission took the following action: 1. Rezoning. Bohne moved, Wilkins seconded the motion to recommend to the Council approval of .the rezoning of Dineen Addition. All members voted in favor. 2. Bohne moved, Wilkins seconded the motion, all members voted in favor to recommend to the Council approval of the preliminary plat subject to the following conditions: A. Cash dedication per lot shall be required for the seven lots. B. All other City ordinances shall be met. C. All required easements required by Eagan City staff shall be dedicated to the City. D. A drainage easement shall be dedicated to incorporate the 911.0 elevation for Hay Lake. E. A utility easement shall be dedicated to incorporate the re- quired extension of the trunk sanitary sewer along the south side of Hay Lake. F. Configuration of the proposed plat must be revised to insure that there is proper 3:1 slopes and that no encroachment of fill material is required within the 910.0 elevation. Agenda Information Memo February 13 1981 Page Sixteen REZONING & PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR GALAXIE PARK ADDITION D. Thomas W. Heiberg for Rezoning from A, Agricultural, to PD, Planned Development District, and Preliminary Plat Approval of Galaxie Park Addition -- A public hearing was held before the APC at their January 27, 1981 meeting to consider two ( 2) applications submitted by Thomas Heiberg. The first application submitted was a request to rezone approximately 36 acres from A to PD. The second application submitted is a request for a preliminary plat of the first phase of Galaxie Park Addition which will contain approxi- mately 7. 9 acres and contain 44 dwelling units . The Advisory Plan- ning Commission is recommending approval of both applications to the City Council . For additional information on the matter, please the Cit Planner' s report, a copy of which is enclosed refer to y P through , for our reference. Enclosed in the on 3..- pages 6 Y P g g --T side pocket o your fol-der is a larger drawing of the proposed Galaxie Park Addition which is labeled "PLAT # 4". For information regarding the "action taken by the APC, please refer to a copy of their minutes enclosed on pagesI XL through . ACTION TO BE .CONSIDERED ON THIS MATTER: To approve or deny the recommendation of the APC to approve the rezoning and preliminary plat entitled Galaxie Park Addition. J CITY OF EAGAN SUBJECT: REZONING AMID PRMMVMW.Y PLAT - GALAXY PARK ADDITION APPLICANT: THCMA.S HEIBERG LOCATION: F,� CF THE Nta;, SECTION 32 EXISTING ZONING: A (AGRICULTURAL) DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: JANUARY 27, 1981 DATE OF REPORT: JANUARY 22, 1981 REPORTED BY: DALE C. RUNKLE, CITY PIANNER APPLICATION SUEMI= The first application submitted is a request to rezone approximately 36 acres frau A (Agricultural) to PD (Planned Developrient District) . The second appli- cation submitted is a requet for a preliminary plat of the first phase of Galaxy Park Addition which will contain approximately 7.9 acres and contain 44 dwelling units. OUP�TrS The subject parcel is the land which is west of Ridgecliffe Addition and south and east of the new alignment of Galaxie Avenue. The proposed planned develop- ment consists of 35.7 acres and will contain 170 duelling units. . The overall density for the development is 4.76 dwelling units per acre. Acoording to the propgsed Corp Plan, the land use indicated for this area is R-2 (Mixed Residential) with a density of 3-6 units per acre. The.prcposed planned development is within this density range. T've proposed planned development will have three different types of housing units. The breakdown on this development is as follows: Land Use Acres Units Density Single Family 1.4 4 2.8 units per acre Duplex 10.1 46 4.5 units per acre Townhouse 18.6 120 6.4 units per acre Road Right-of-way 5.6 ZCTAL 35.7 170 4.8 units per acre The applicant has done a very good job in the layout and design of the proposed planned development. The primed plan shows the extension of Covington Lane to Galaxie Avenue. It also takes into consideration Narvik Drive which also bisects the northeastern portion of the site. The applicant has pieced together some of the land-locked parcels in Ridgecliffe Addition, which will make the land-locoed 4 CITY OF EAGAN GALAXY PARK ADDITION JANUARY 22, 1981 PAGE TWO parcel developable at this time. The applicant is also proposing to put duplexes abutting the Ridgecliffe Addition, then moving to a higher density as you go west to Galaxie Avenue. All of the proposed land uses for the type of dwelling meets the zoning ordinance requirements for lot coverage and density. The R-3, or todnhouse developr.ent, is proposed to develop as either 6-plexes or 8-plexes. Which ever type of unit would occur, the development would meet the 6.4 dwelling units per acre. The applicant is also proposing to develop this planned develop- ment with the passive solar concept. The buildings are all directed to maximize the angle of the sun for both summer and winter. The applicant has also indicated that the construction would be with 2 x 6 walls for maximum insulation versus the 2 x 4, which is presently the standard in the building code. PRIELIMMSPM PLAT FIRST PHASE The first phase of development will contain 13 lots and 2 outlots. The area which will be developed will contain approximately 7.9 acres and contain 44 dwelling units. The area which is being platted will have access by a looped street which will connect to Galaxie Avenue. The applicant is also proposing to plat a stub street to Ridgecliffe Addition in order that Orrin Thompson can develop the almost land-locked parcel. Another stub street is provided on the southerly portion of the looped street, which in the future, will be a cul-de-sac serving the duplex units. The applicant is also proposing to plat Covington Lane extension from the Ridgecliffe Addition to Galaxie Avenue. The entire 35.7 acres is taken up with the plat with the First Phase. However, only 7.9 acres can develop at this time without a re-plat of either one of the two outlots. The applicant is proposing to construct duplexes on lots 1-4 of Block 1; Wt 5, Block 1 will contain 4 townhouse buildings with 6 dwelling units in each building for a total of 24 units. Lots 1-3, Block 2 and Lot 1, Block 3 will be single family homes. Lots 1-4, Block 4, will also contain duplex buildings. The only lot which at the present time does not meet ordinance requirements is Lot 1, Block 3. Pre- sently, this lot contains 11,100 square feet. In the future there will have to be cooperation between Ridgecliffe Addition and Galaxy Park. There is a small triangle which should be traded by each one of the developers to make the lots oonform to this addition. With this additional triangle, Lot 1, Block 3 would then contain 12,150 feet, which is in excess of the square footage requirement for a single family residential home. The applicant has proposed a phasing plan for this development. The phasing plan will be done in three phases, the first being 1981-1982, the second, possibly 1981-1983 and the third phase being in 1982- 1986. The applicant is then proposing a 5-year planned development for Galaxy Park Planned Developmmt. If approved, the planned development should be subject to the following conditions: 4 1. A planned development agreement shall be drafted and executed with the City of Eagan, rw t -i o j--o-i- .. .{-v� c c) 2. There shall be no more than 170 &ening units allowable for construction within the planned deve]qpment. E.. 3. A detailed grading and drainage and erosion control plan 'shall be approved by City staff. 4. A detailed 1Fu�dscape plan shall be approved by the City staff, and a land- scape bond of $2,000 shall be required and not released until one year after the landscaping has been ompleted. 5 CITY OF EAGAN GALAM PARK ADDITION JAWPM 27, 1981 PAGE THREE 5. A cash dedication shall be dedicated with the platting of each phase. This dedication shall be based at the current park dedication rate. 6. The sidewalk shall continue on the northside of Covington Lane to Galaxy Avenue. 7. A haneowner's association bylaws shall be reviewed by the City staff before final plat approval. DCR/jac ENGLNEERING FtECOMMENDATIONS 1. A 5-toot concrete sidewalk rust be installed as a responsibility of this developer along the northside of Covington Lane. 2. Drainage easement incorporating the 916.0 elevation for Pond AP-15 must be dedicated as a part of final plat, in addition to the common drain- age and utility easements adjacent to property lines. TAC/jac TO: ADVISORY PLANNING CU4ILSSION, C/O DALE C. FAL ME, CITY PINVER FROM: THCMP,S A. COLBERT, DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS DATE: JANUARY 22, 1981 BE: PREIMMIl ,RY PLAT - GALAXY PARK ADDITION Public Works Department has the following cam encs to offer in regards to the proposed preliminary plat: UTILITIES Sanitary sewer, watermain and storm sews facilities of sufficient size and depth to service this proposed addition are anticipated to be installed during 1981 under Project 316. Public hearings for these public utility installations are anticipated to be held during April of 1981. GRADING AMID DRAINAGE The overall drainage for this plat will be picked up by internal storm sewer laterals as necessary, and directed to the onsite ponding area which will have a controlled storm water outlet provided under Project 316 as discussed previously. STREETS AMID TRAIL;)AYS Due to the configuration and topography of this parcel of property, the proposed cul-de-sac is acceptable as proposed to the Public Works Departr�ent. The developer is proposing to continue Covington Way frau Ridgecliffe 1st Addition to Galaxie , Avenue. Although this is a minor collector, the proposed 60-foot right-of-way is acceptable as proposed. There will be a requirement for a 5-foot concrete sidewalk to be installed along the northside of Covington Lane. An 8-foot bituminous trail- way will be constructed along the eastside of Galaxie Avenue under Project 316 by the City. EASFfimVTS AMID RIGHTS-0F-AW Sufficient right-of-way has already been acquired for the relocation of Galaxie Avenue by MnDOT. Sufficient drainage easements must be dedicated to incorporate the 916.0 elevation of Pond AP-15. I will be available 'to answer any questions concerning this plat at the Planning Cmn-&ssicn Meeting of January 27. Respectfully submitted, Thanas A. Colbert, P.E. Director of Public Works TAC/jac �-q w, �_"�+n• �� , mss- ,�,r.. _' y.,-;_�f_ate- 1�.. • •�'�. � +. : a �� , r�`N �. �� i-•-•-•-- ! t ` •% , _ ��' �� _ �.. ` ,� - �- � fir•, '. '•' \J� . z ''i Jam:+ .—�--•� M" e4 Imam wor t t. f .��/-•.� / _WAY �outlt � , � > � 1./ � � +� 30►Nt►rw�j- i/ 11 �� ' �. •� � _ � piaavac xwv epey2mrre '. \\ ,\ ununcs- H, 1. `~ i�,;,.,t wa.•.."r�w.l '\ ' NNR.' 'r ! �1'�•L YOC!,- MOT BOUNTY PARK•�• .f GRIM PRRI( PUD IAcAn.1MIMSOTO lite analysis/vtilitie'r • rue ter.r.».1 RY tnnwsnl(E • ws��I� Ausr rrV 1•..,.I ' L.I.�M wM+r_...,N.f, ! J � � y r -� may... i—•�•�1 /yi--"s"'i""� .- �„-�-"•-' s � �Z � An ��--'�� r,'._�-�••��,� -;- _ -�=y-��--•' tet', , 1 �41oe �� , _ fit^• "oe ` 7�,�J'-- ��:•�//�.� ; � �.:�, . i �. / `.X'�`- =5 ,1/�? ��•i -.--_�.� ! :t�• RIS WAY vo `/ ,.�t11 1�, i�,, `'i + •''� JT fland use ncrur units denalfy � Single Family 1.4 4 2.8 u/ac 111 1 f. J' jr�ir ! -'.:. i t J • -�'" •Double /> 4.5 10.1 48 4.5 u!ac (R-2) ?r�, Med.Multiple �qd.Multiple �' '! (5x,ea) t8.6 120 6.4 u/ac . � t // .�I:`, � ?y � ,• ` \ .\ � -, fir\ Road R.O.W. 5.6 (! \ ,` • � F` Total 35.7 170LO 4.8 u%ac F-Le ^ Med.Multiple ^_ . f 1. It Double T i t �- �" (R-2) i V��NE '" 1981 82 M. IlAultlple � COVIN GI /" 1981 - 83 (R-5i) t Double 11982 86 (R-2) ( ' - DAKOTA COUNTY PARK GnIAXY PRRK PUD •� Encnn.minnflOTn land we plan ' as NN. 14,1081 ny mnDIRKE t phasing 1 t f I �,�•r. � —. _'�, '� '� :r fir_ 0.;4 F%4 ..� ARIS WAY y 11 X I/�) J i V 01 iI,�F CK 4� — �-�i r~ 7f. Mck ,!• 1�1' t1 �.4•ti' )`f `\,�1, : •�.. ' �� ,, h,�;�-- r,• ku COYIHGTb /.•� .,a: ...1c•d 7o.am , + , ��.•l!`11 ��a.�.� f�� ! ,�� i � .�,\ ♦\\ \� - r^ •T � 1 .F, yrs Y!1[.-� 11.00 .a- ' ,.. '�-- '-'-'- .-•-�L•:..�.�.-1..3_.x•.: ,�. ) 1 .. .� '� ...�. r,i(a� h..00 ...,1 (•j it r�., _..•.�.+w.• "*.P N sl..ao 1 DAKOTA COUNTY PARK f C: w s(••1 b.wo j '� '} wt•lrq q soo 1 J �Illrtl Ce•..••1 n.t� •.hr�•ss s. r� • ! GAIAXY PARK PUD "Gnn.minnEsorn preliminary plat .L. BYDOE.JAOL 18. 1 I Pi. :ccs . .... . . . . ... :I Y' . . . .. ... . . .. .t ,'• :� �. T pi k' 2� Q. `� �.P r: J l :. {l11{ r 4 f , NO — .•_Q UTILITY _ .: ;. .. . ..::.--.: / - ' . I J• •- �f 1 lei 1: + I h: �^� I I a h� T ' 11 •'� J► '1� I I r-• i i J !' �,�; �,O ttK*.`,;`.,.^,;� ��I III ; � ! l.►•� � �+� I� /� �' LE i.,� It�, II �+�, I1 . 132_ RIVER f TEST � i �� ► ' Ll ENTER I fit / r PD v / L✓ RRRC. s � fry 1J;ldf:w ,�•� �.r1+ �� `I:,jy�:�-;'J) Jc -), -��'S'•�•f'-•-.;,3r>�'.7+ )��,ij•�.��+�JJ�.�r��'�.r��J•_>t-,ila'-�}.ti��e)�j f l.j.t.�V+'3tt � y4.�►i�f Y+ .��. 4� :J.fl+�• .r�!�)' �3►r'ij JET` L "... I . ,� .i'f i.lam .1 . •�'+.�J.,r: ' NO♦ J=' `lf ', �'• ,: / 1')r'.��„J� Z.l,jL J•tjt•� ��•:�;•!'• )-J'/.J�Y�'� ,j `� ./M[y .�' � Ji;� .+.,iJ-i-.rv'•./ ij� +f7�. „t; :�„5, .. Q r �+j �= :�, -r3J ,: eA�+..I •` f- y J• J wl� j_r�•J'•. an.w�r.�...�� / y_ , !'`� .� 'tra 3 ��/.,/� �eI i♦ �.'�•1J.) /�• �t •�.� -�•�-`��l.'�.f,�w� • GAI.XIE PARK ADDITION REZONING AND PRELDURAR? PIAT The next hearing convened concerned the application of Thomas Heiberg for the rezoning of approximately 36 acres located in the east half of the north- west section . of Section 32 from Agricultural to Planned Development District and also for the preliminary plat approval of the first phase of Galaxie Park Addition containing approximately 7.9 acres and containing 44 proposed dwel- ling units. Stelious Astelinidos appeared for the applicant and discussed the proposal including the connection with several streets platted in the Ridge- cliffe Addition and also the fact that the plat had been designed to fully utilize passive solar capabilities. There was concern that adequate parking spaces be provided as required by Ordinance and City Planner Runkle indicated that 2-112 spaces per unit would be required for the multiple dwellings. Member Krob discussed the need for one or more tot lots within the planned development and City Planner Runkle stated that the construction of tot lots have been imposed as conditions in similar developments located within the City. Member Wilkins indicated her concern that, should the cul-de-sac ex- tending between Blocks 2 and 3 not be constructed prior to the sale of Lots 1 through 3, Block 2, the applicant should inform the buyers of these lots that only temporary access will be allowed off of Galaxie Avenue. After further discussion, the Planning Commission took the following action: 1. Krob moved, Heywood seconded, that the Planning Commission recommend rezoning to Planned Development District subject to the following conditions: A. That the Planned Development be completed within a period of five years. B. A Planned Development Agreement shall be drafted and executed with the City of Eagan. C. That there shall be no more than 170 dwelling units allowable for construction within the Planned Development. D. That the underlying zoning shall remain Agricultural. All members voted in favor. t 2. Preliminary plat. A motion was made by Krob, seconded by Gits, that the Planning Commission recommend to the City Council approval of the prelimi- nary plat of Galaxie Park Addition under the following conditions: A. A detailed grading, drainage and erosion control plan, including the proposed elevation and location for garages on each lot, shall be approved by the City staff prior to final plat approval. B. A detailed landscape plan shall be approved by the City staff prior to final plat approval and a landscape bond adequate to require compli- ance with the plan shall be required with each phase of development and not released until one year after the landscaping has been completed. C. A cash park dedication shall be dedicated with the platting of each phase. This dedication shall be based on the park dedication rate in effect at the time of final plat approval of each phase. D. The homeowner's association bylaws shall be reviewed by the City staff before final plat approval. E. A 5-foot concrete sidewalk shall be installed at the cost of this developer along the north side of Covington Lane. G. A drainage easement incorporating the 916.0 elevation for Pond AP-15 shall be dedicated as a part of final plat, in addition to the common drainage and utility easements adjacent to property lines. H. All other easements required by the City shall be dedicated as required by the City staff. I. Prior to final plat approval of the first phase, the developer shall submit for City approval a plan for the location of tot lots adequate to serve the needs of the development. The tot lots shall be constructed at the developer's cost with the applicable phase of development. J. The developer shall dedicate a 40-foot half right-of-way for Galaxie Avenue south of the right-of-way acquired by the Minnesota Department of Transportation. K. The .developer shall inform any purchasers of Tots located in Block 2 that only temporary access will be allowed off of Galaxie Avenue and plans for permanent access off of the adjacent cul-de-sac shall be provided at the time of building permit request. s 6T CITY OF EAGAN SUBJECT: VARIANCE APPLICANT: J. I. CASE - R. D. BERNSTEIN LOCATION: Sh$4 OF THE N6.;, SDCTICN 2 EXISTING ZONING: I-1 (LIGHT INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT) DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: JANUARY 27, 1981 DATE OF REPORT: JANUARY 20, 1981 REPORTED BY: DALE c. RUN M, CITY PLANNER R APPLICATION SUBMITTED An application has been submitted for a variance to exceed the 3516 lot coverage in a Light Industrial District. CM1'.CrM J. I. Case presently has their many located in Eagan. The present facility contains approximately 69,700. square feet on a lot which is 5.3 acres for a lot coverage of 29%. Glen J. I. Case. originally bought the property, the lot area was 6.8 acres. The State has purchased right-of-way to upgrade State Highway 55 and Lexington Avenue. This right-of-way acquisition reduced the Lot or site to 5.3 acres. J. I. Case is pmposiug to build a 28,450 square foot addition to their present facility. This addition would be strictly warehouse and it is the City's under- standing that this addition would only add an additional four full-time em,loyees to J. I. case's present work force. Therefore, the staff does not see a problem with parking for this facility at this time. The problem which J. I. Case is facing is that this proposed expansion will create a lot coverage of 40.8%,,whish is in excess of the City's lot coverage requirements for an Industrial District. J. I. Case is going through the process to buy back right-of-way. The State will not need to upgrade these two roadways. There is approximately 1.2 acres which J. I. Case could re-aquire from the State. This would bring bade J. I. case's Lot size to 6.5-6.8 acres, and the proposed expansion would then only create a 33% lot coverage which would be within the requirement for lot coverage within an Industrial District. In reviewing this applicaticn, one can juggle the lot coverage requirements around depending if J. I. Case owned the property or if the square footage in question would still remain in-right-of-WW or green area retained by the highway department. A point to be considered is that the land area is still there no matter who owns what property, and the intent of the ordinance to provide openess arra green space within an industrial park is still 67 CITY CP EAGAN J. I. CASE JANUARY 27, 1981 PAGE TWO being met. Therefore, there is sane justification in granting the variance request. If approved, the variance should be subject to the following conditions: 1. Even though the intent of the Industrial District is being met, J. I. Case pursue the re-acquisition of the excess right-of-way to meet the technical aspect of the zoning ordinance. 2. A site plan shall be approved by the City staff showing the parking ratio for the overall develognent of the site. 3. A landscape plan shall be submitted and approved by the Eagan City staff. DCR/jac r 6 l,•( ! -i'iri it M..wtw L `a+-i\•r,F:SW,�y +�s=�N°'�yti'�r. !�.". -, �t -- �5 .^� ii..� 3,. ...7slu �i:� �� _�+,y � .�S' r,� w.• •� �.+��•.'.� ^. ac y� •r -•.K. rf _7 .. _, i i<- •..1 .,!„r ,�, Tt jtt -.�...Y / _7 7 r .•. _ .� t,..fit s.t d-.>R - i ! J \,� J J t:-,••s:tam �. •.ttf' '!.j;t � _�" t.s� `ti•� ��.``� ��i,�t - y+ti y. ,. t; � �.., al'.` ♦ _{=A�;•1L� ��.Y*�.ka a;�.-. s. '�.� �\t ,/,� yr 'i•".w -4 -•. ��'4y '�-- •f.r+�4•rLm t -. y - 1 - 7R.. �..-•a. .y\✓� i -c'. � 1•�� Ss s. ,fit♦ � y�•Y t'4 c 'v ■ - 4.f J . �i _ .s l t �tLQ. .: r y 4 r Li' s_i :{'•4 pT1s Y-•• Y2 \ .4� .` \+,• s �...D►i Y r ..3a� J xt�i��1 �_��a,.•.w�-`��y�_.•l �,,;,_ .. � a Y� 1?,�* Yr..�.,a. . i... S .'� w <. �,�.,`.! i 11 '.. r'1'.2�^ � � ��'••,.._• ;�\ .,` � �., `t' a.f-j....,��..�R � 'x,7.5 +.'��T�'I�t-�-, r s _ a �.�.a •�-.� eL��k .k �.w ?s tS Yt r i `%Ft�f•.�: .LT" �' -�►.:�. 1i.��s••�;' � L �{ t R c �•ti. +. ,•t f K '♦ 1}• < t �'i- L r.r .,a •_; .t. f'.Tr - ♦ r,.t t .1 ab 01, lk .: ,+1 S � :� -i i t `s<tire•.� -"�„S o �•. � 4t � - �� t�.t c .� �� ' �j: � _ i •' - y,�?, -� ..'ice � � - � -^S' � R _ _ - ifs\;� i � _ • - �f 1 � ` � � •�j�;.� -tom { L! , -'_ .f �• •• .. 111 / / f .. '. .. Ill � � �Z�C.•, r R� = a_ _ - I JIF f .6 ifi"�'-�.1 r..s.,w. t•�;+ �„l. :v�TJ - '.•.► a. a a L.rr �' '�f� �'dv. +t��.�j r.+�. . �v.. y•S ori' • • .. Ir x _2:: -______ _ _ t / -- ----'„TENTATIVE U It _ :"��:,w�� ;a �� j. ��R BLUES GENTIAN ROAol = •:'r �\ 7 /I/ �^•�•;•, // ,K�''• 7�1 It /��/� ///�/�/ -�..�-... :''`` 'fiy�"J1�' j � ,,ll ��fl ��,,��_r.` r•' // F•l." :'.,r` !y rr ,f '-Y.� _ � , ,�n� � rRR' Y'`r`,�:�' � ^':�",rte •�:^ � YI, :• /f��/ - • '; -ti., r.� �' `' .;r ?'�k.. ..:,•tip/� _ .4• � � r'{.11 {r f�� . .� rJ•'1/ `�` '{? •'•.1';(:tib'� i ,\•.' .ti'." t !;` , i.; a 7, I WIlle.1i'i X. t:R Y �r� ,\•.:• ;� � ti_.f, of x�r�rS „�,• /' NX v?;rte` .:t - `, •.•~�� :•:: .}• •• ��,'�`��. `% �� Vr 1` �~}r`l;` w`I�'�S •�"R i ••Y','�i �{'�•r' •Jtt�. •r�~:i. �. •,}!•< N}Sti��r'N !�.:� �,� .�' r .r/r • • J }'S}�� •tilr.�•r�r'J�ti�'��4��iN Ji ��r'�' r�r•� . I {�'Y.'.Y'f R h••• .i �y a,4 { I� ••'\~r. �}y�,t• .' ;�•'� S,. .ti ,tiy;} � ?r :• .� �,.r ftir ,574;•/'• /, r _ T'� •, ,yr .• }; f t�'rt. �'r. 't `;c •trr"j;; /,:•' ''.' 'ty�` '�:.rte jt• •: �� 'r�r.rfi:�: r: J. I. CASE VARIANCE The Vice-Chairman next convened the public hearing for a variance from the ordinance requirement that building area not exceed 35% lot coverage within an I-1, Light Industrial District. The variance was requested by J. I. Case Company and R. D. Bernstein appeared for the applicant. Mr. Bernstein indicated that the existing J. I. Case facility contains approximately 69,700 square feet and has lot coverage of approximately 29% on their 5.3 acre parcel. The proposed expansion of the building would result in a 40.8% lot coverage. J.I. Case Company is presently negotiating the repurchase of prop- erty previously dedicated for highway use to the State of Minnesota and the purchase of the intended parcel would reduce the lot coverage to 36.7%. In the future, J.I. Case will also be reacquiring a second parcel which would reduce lot coverage to approximately 33%• City Planner Runkle discussed the two parcels which are to be reacquired and stated that the intent of the ordinance requirement is presently being complied with because these parcels exist as green area, whether owned by the State of Minnesota or by J. I. Case Company, but wherever possible, the technical requirements of the ordinance should be complied with. Upon further discussion, Gits moved, Krob seconded, and all members voted in favor, that it be recommended to the City Council that a variance from the 35% maximum lot coverage requirement be approved allowing an increase to 40.8% under the following conditions: 1. Even though the intent of the Industrial District is being met, J. I. Case should pursue the reacquisition of the excess right-of-way to meet the technical aspect of the zoning ordinance. 2. A site plan shall be approved by the City staff showing the parking ratio for the overall development of the site. 1 3. A landscape plan shall be submitted and approved by the Eagan City staff. 4. Compliance with all other ordinance requirements. 5. The owner shall enter into a recordable agreement with the City of Eagan stating that there shall be no change in the use of the property without prior City Council approval. 76 .Agenda Information Memo February 13 , 1981 Page Eighteen TEMPORARY. ADVERTISING. SIGN. DEVELOPERS CONSTRUCTION. INC F. Developers Construction, Inc. , for a Temporary Advertising Sign -- An application was submitted by Developers Construction Inc . to errect a temporary advertising sign advertising the availa- bility of homesites in Safari Estates . Enclosed on page 72.- is a copy of a memorandum from the City Planner, along with picture of the temporary sign as it exists . ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS MATTER: To approve or deny a temporary advertising sign not to exceed two (2 ) years to Developers Construction, Inc. -7 70: 2fKMA.S L. HEDGES, CI'T'Y ADMINISTRATOR FRCM: DALE C RUNKLE, CITY PLANNER DATE: FEBIUARY 12, 1981 RE: AGENDA ITEM F UNDER NEW BUSINESS - TEMPORARY ADVERTISING SIGN FOR DEVEIOPER'S CONSTRUCTION INC An application has been submitted for a tenQorary advertising sign advertising Safari Estates, which is a new develcVnent located in the SPh of Section 32. The proposed sign is located in the SW guadrant of Cliff Road and Galaxie Road. The proposed sign has approximately 32 square feet and it meets all the setback requirements. The applicant is requesting the temporary advertising sign which is in accordance with Ordinance #16.02, Subdivision 1, Terpbrary Advertising Signs advertising new residential developments are allowed in agriculturally- zoned areas. A temporary advertising sign is allowed for a specific duration not to exceed two years. Therefore, the applicant is requesting that the per- mit be granted for two years in accordance with Ordinance 16. However, the application will be reviewed by staff and a sign permit will be charged for the second year. Enclosed is a picture of the sign which is being proposed for the temporary advertising sign permit. The applicant has, however, already erected this sign on February 6, 1981 and in order to axrply with the ordinance, the applicant must acquire the temporary advertising sign permit. All other conditions related to the temporary advertising sign are net with this proposed si Wi�' ' DCR/7ac z t 7 ,. i Agenda Information Memo February 13 , 1981 Page Nineteen 1)Ila Ott] I.R. FINANCING PILOT KNOB SHOPPING CENTER A. Establish a Public Hearing _to Consider I .R. Financing for Pilot Knob Shopping Center in - the Amount of $5,500,000 for March 17, 1981 -- A letter was received from Miller & Schroeder Municipals Inc. requesting that approval be given by the City Council to establish a public hearing to consider tax exempt I . R. financing for the Pilot Knob Shopping Center in the amount of $5 ,500,000 for the March 17 , 1981 City Council meeting. This item is in order for consideration if the preliminary plat . and concept approval is authorized for Pilot Knob Center under Item A of New Business . The City has received all the necessary documents, such as the public hearing notice and other pertinent information to process the application. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS MATTER: To approve or deny a public hearing to consider tax exempt financing for the Pilot , Knob Center at the 3-17-81 meeting. s/Thomas L. Hedges City ministrator MEMO TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCILMEMBERS FROM: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES DATE: FEBRUARY 13, 1981 SUBJECT: INFORMATIVE MEMO Enclosed on pages .?.T through . 7G is a copy of the most recent tax exempt housing report from Banco. Also enclosed is a copy of a memorandum from the City Administrator to City Councilmember Parranto addressing his question raised at the February 3, 1981 City Council meeting. (Page ? ) There have been a number of questions asked at previous Advisory Planning Commission meetings and certainly of the City staff in resent regarding the types of housing units being constructed in Eagan. Enclosed on pages through " 9 is a graphic illustra- tion prepared by Administra ive Intern ie a for the City Admini- strator that compares the number and type of housing units for 1978, 79 and 80. A copy of this information will be provided to the Advisory Planning Commission at their next meeting. Enclosed on page is a census information update as provided by Administrative Infern Ulrich. Due to economic conditions, the industrial development revenue bond application for Safari Mall is postponed indefinitely. Please refer to a letter from Rothchilds Financial Corporation found on page . Enclosed on pages 2 through �'.. .. is a copy of a memorandum from the City Attorney s office entitted "Model Drug Paraphernalia Act -- Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals Decision". In speaking with the City Attorney, he feels revision to the ordinance would be more in order after a decision is reached by the U. S. Supreme Court. This information is informative and, at the appropriate time, staff will present an ordinance revision for consideration by the City Council . Enclosed on .pages - " owl through 1 . is a copy 'of a memorandum from John Voss, PIann ng Consultan , regarding the "Revisions to Eagan' s Comprehensive Guide Plan". The City Administrator would like to discuss this memorandum in brief with the City Council after formal agenda items are addressed at the regular meeting on Tuesday. If there are any additional items which members of the City Council are concerned with regarding the comprehensive Guide Plan, please write them down or make a mental note so admini- stratively Mr. Voss can be given direction to proceed with final revision of the Comprehensive Guide Plan in preparation for- Tie March 3, 1981 meeting. s/Thomas L. . Hedges city Aaminl sEra£'or 0 0 , LUTE: February 4, 1981 CITY Cr EAGAN $16,940,000--Amount of Program Dollar Amount of Funds Remaining $ 585,275 Low Income $ .162,925 Basic Incane $ 222,350 Single Family Funds Remaining $ 93,050 Condo Fluids Remaining $ 413.050 Townhouse Funds Remaining $_ 79,175 Mobile Hcme Funds Remaining $ (.Inclusive--Not a Separate Account) Conventional 95% Funds Remaining $ 585.275 (91-95% Conventional Loans) Graduated Conventional Funds Remaining $ 16,900 Graduated 95% Conventional Funds Remaining $ 16,900 Total Pre-Cormtiitrnent knount $ 13,503,875 Total Reserved (Yet to be Pre-Conmitted) $ 2,850,850 $ 16,940,000 '4 �4 • ' DATE: Februar1981- , CITY OF E.N,AN Statistical Data-- Amount of Program $16,940,000 Total Amount of Pre-Ccammitted Loans m,Rm Percentage of Loans Pre-Comdtted __ Rn % Low Incomie Basic Incame Total Number of Loans 134 __ 108 Average Mortgage Amount $ 52,148 ; 60,334 Average Sale Price 57,825 65,651 Average Appraisal Value 58,116 _ 66,807 Average Adjusted Gross Ing 20,096 _ 24,939 Average Gross Income 21 ,336 26,532 Type of Loan: Insured Conventional 6 17 Uninsured Conventional 8 6 FHA 34 50 VA 20 30 Graduated Pledge 66 5 Average Loan to Value Ratio: Insured Conventional g0 91 % Uninsured Conventional 72 % — 75 % Number of New Construction Loans 103 76 Number of Existing Loans 31 32 Type of Dwelli.ncl: Single F'aiidly 61 _ 68 Townhouse 23 _ 5 Condominium 50 --- Mobile Hcymes 0 — 0 Average Previous Residents 16 % 25 % Nuiiber of Ranters 98 -- 75 — Number of Owners 36 33 Sex: Male 86 96 Female 48 Average Family Size 13 2.3 Average Number of Children 3 6 Marital Status: Married 54 64 Single 726 Joint 4 12 �Di Divorced IG: 4 6 Lollar Amount of Loans Funded S 5 1_1,650 NaT ber of Loans r 96 MI 0` TO: CITY COUNCILMEMBER PARRANTO FROM: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES DATE: FEBRUARY 11, 1981 SUBJECT: TAX EXEMPT MORTGAGE HOUSING ISSUE I reviewed the tax exempt mortgage housing issue you raised at the last City Council meeting with Mr. Dick Lincoln of Miller and Schroeder. - First of all , the agreement had a set aside restriction to allow no more than 20% of the moneys deposited in the Acquisition Fund to be used for single family townhouse residences during a nine month period. It so happened that May 6 was the closing date for the program; and on February 6, 1981 , or last Friday, this restriction was lifted. Dick and I both agree that Banco over- interpreted the language regarding the set aside restrictions . If you refer to the attachment, page 30, language reads "For the nine-month period following the date moneys are first deposited a in the Acquisition Fund, no more than twenty percent of the moneys r deposited in the Acquisition Fund may be used to acquire Mortgage Loans for single family Townhouse Residences ." The word may seemed to be interpreted as will in the way Banco treated their reserve fund. However, those moneys have been freed up and can be used for any type of single family housing as of last Friday. With a waiting list of some twenty to twenty-five applications, it is doubtful whether the freeing up of the money will accommodate any new applications with such a long waiting list. City Administratot I a 7 NUMBER & TYPES OF HOUSING UNITS The graph below is a representation of the number and types of housing units as of December 31, 1980. 5000 52.28% _ - -- --- - - 4,447 4000 cn H N 3000 w 0 a W as z 27.57% 2000 2,330 1000 1,294 3.02% 1.41% 256. .12% - 10 units Single Mobile Family Duplex Townhousel Condo Apt TYPE OF HOUSING i 300 NUMBER 86% OF 200 UNITS 222 1978 100 6% t7 4v 0% 0% - Single Family Duplex ]Townhouse Condo Apt TYPE OF HOUSING 300 NUMBER 44% OF 200 235 UNITS 39% 1979 206 100 11% 6% 58 0 32 0% Single - Family Duplex Townhouse Condo Apt TYPE OF HOUSING 300 29% 289 24% 25% NUMBER OF 200 246 .256 UNITS 1980 100 162 5% 0 50 Single Family Duplex Townhouse Condo Apt TYPE OF HOUSING MEMO TO: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES FROM: ADMINISTRATIVE INTERN ULRICH DATE: FEBRUARY b, 1981 SUBJECT: CENSUS INFORMATION UPDATE A recent coversation with a Census Bureau representative in Kansas City, Kansas , yielded the following information: 1. As previously reported, the revised preliminary counts for the City show that the City had a population of 20,700 and a housing count of 7,215 units at the time , the census was taken. These figures are not expected to change significantly. 2. Final population and housing counts will be available in e ruary or March ot this year. These counts will include only the total population and housing counts for the entire City. That is, there will be no further breakdown of the counts either by geographic area or by demographic characteristics , e.g. , age, sex, race or income. 3. Final block (small geographic area) data will be available tor the City in du or August of this year. These block statistics will include a complete demographic breakdown by block and by enumeration district (a larger geographic area) and will also include detailed information for the entire City. 4. Final census tract data will be available in April , 1982. This in ormation will include detailed demographicaceta lot City census - tracts and geographic subdivisions. It was not readily apparant why this information will not be available until April , 1982. The Census Bureau Representative gave the explanation that census tract boundaries will not be defined until that time. However, it is my belief that for the purposes of the City the block data received in July/August 1981 will certainly be of sufficient detail to provide any demographic information necessary. cc: Dale Runkle • • MORTGAGE BANKERS ' � AFB n"�� p Since 1885 4940 VIKING DRIVE February 6, 1981 �1 �' EDINA,MN 55435 TELEPHONE(612)835-7511 Z' 1 Mr. Thomas Hedges City of Eagan 3795 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, Minnesota 55122 Re: Industrial Development Revenue Bond Approval Safari Mall Eagan, Minnesota Dear Tom: On behalf of Eagan Associates, we would like to request a indefinite postponement of the public hearing that was scheduled for February 17 on the above referenced project. We have been contacting prospective lenders to get a feel for the terms that are available and have found that financing is not advantageous at this time. From these conversations it is Eagan Associates' decision that it would be in the project's best interest to step back and wait to see if the financial market will improve in the near future. If you have any questions regarding this request, please contact me. Sincerely, ROTHSCHILD FINANCIAL CORPORATION Stan Johan es Assistant ice President SJ/nmp do' EQUAL OPPORTUNITY LENDER 13 01 0502 PAUL H. HAUGE & Assocums. P. A. ATTORNEYS AT LAW 2908 SISLEY MEMORIAL HIGHWAY EAGAN (ST. PAUL), MINNESOTA 55122 PAUL H. HAUGE BRADLEY SMITH Amu Cops E 12 KEVIN W. EIDE TasrH0116 454.4224 DAVID G. KELLER February 4, 1981 Mr. Thomas L. Hedges, City Administrator 3795 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55122 Re: Model Drug Paraphernalia Act -- Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals Decision Dear Mr. Hedges: This letter is for the purpose of informing you and the City Council of the effect of the recent Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals decision on the City's Drug Paraphernalia Ordinance. On December 8, 1980, the Sixth Circuit Appeals Court passed on the constitu- tionality of the Model Drug Paraphernalia Act, which is the basis for the City's present Drug Paraphernalia Ordinance. The Court found the ordinance of the City of Parma, Ohio, to be unconstitutional in part, and constitutional in part. The unconstitutional portions are capable of .being removed from the ordinance without interfering with the basic purpose of it. The Court found that a portion of the definition, referring to items "designed for use" with illegal drugs is vague and over broad. The Court also found language referring to persons who "reasonably should know that other persons intend to use a device with drugs," is vague and over broad&, In addition, the Court found the section controlling the advertisement of drug paraphernalia violates the First Amendment. Finally, the Court found that one of the enforce- ment guidelines referring to "legitimate suppliers" is vague and over broad. The Court suggested the other enforcement guidelines, while not being unconsti- tutional, could possibly result in guilt by association. Based upon the Sixth Circuit decision, the Eagan Ordinance could quite easily be amended to conform with the guidelines in the opinion. Apparently a number of cities in Ohio are planning to do that. However, the City of Parma has filed an appeal with the United States Supreme Court in hopes of having the entire ordinance found constitutional. The City of Eagan's options in response to the decision are basically two. First, the City could refrain from changing the ordinance and wait for a decision by the United States Supreme Court. Second, the City could amend the ordinance to comply with the Sixth Circuit decision. It should be stressed that the Sixth Circuit decision is not binding on courts in the State of • 1 Mr. Hedges February 4, 1981 Page Two Minnesota, but it does have some persuasive weight. There is presently pending an Eighth Circuit decision on the Model Drug Paraphernalia Act, but it is unknown when that will be decided. The question of how to respond is not particularly crucial at this point, because there are no known suppliers of drug paraphernalia within the City, and if a court case arose challenging the ordinance, the City could amend it at that time to conform with the Sixth Circuit decision. Very truly yours Bradley Smith skk PN c adLIL 2800 East Cliff Road Suite 140 Burnsville, Mn. 55337 • (612) 890-2320 DESIGN, NO- John S. Voss, President -- MEMORANDUM -- TO: Tom Hedges, City Administrator FROM: John S. Voss, Planning Consultant DQE- February 12, 1981 SUBJECT: Revisions to Eagan's Comprehensive Guide Plan I Certain revisions as detailed below are being made to the maps and texts of the Eagan Comprehensive Guide Plan from that which was presented at the formal public hearing on April 29, 1980. This is our understand- ing of the revisions that are desired by the City. If any of this is incorrect or incomplete, please advise. It is our objective to prepare these revisions next week so that they may be printed and available for the March 3rd meeting of the City Council wherein the Comprehensive Plan may be formally accepted and forwarded to the Metropolitan Council for review. II MAPS 1 . Planned Urbanization - page IV-7 This map will be revised to show the entire City available for urbanization except the Minnesota River Valley Floodplain. 2. Land Use Guide Plan - page IV-33 This map will be revised as follows to reflect more current zoning: New Designation Area Industrial - NW quadrant of Old Cedar & RR tracks - L & F Add. R-III - SW quadrant of Thomas Lake Rd. & #30 - Morton Prop. Institutional - SE quadrant of Pilot Knob Rd. & Berry Ridge Rd. (church) R & D - Buffer zone adjacent to Country Home Heights Industrial - SE quadrant of Dodd Rd. & Wescott Rd. - Central Fence General Business - SE quadrant of #49 & #55 - Skelly Station & south Commercial PD - Area adjacent & east of Dayton/Hudson property PLANNING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE SITE DESIGN Memo to Tom Hedges 0 • February 12, 1981 From: John S. Voss It Page 2 III TEXT I . Comprehensive Guide Plan Language Certain language, as prepared by the City Attorney, will be included in the "PREFACE" to the Plan and again in the LAND USE SECTION just before the Land Use Map to insure that the Plan is intended as a "guide" and not a zoning map et al . 2. Utilities - Section V Bob Rosene's redraft of the sanitary sewer section (page V-3), in- cluding projected sewage flows, will be added. Also, a new paragraph on "Additional Growth Beyond Comprehensive Plan Estimates" will be added. 3. Transportation - Section VI Four Oaks Road will be deleted through the Univac Property by erasing same from the existing maps. New maps will not be printed at this time, however, this street will be erased on all official copies forwarded to the Metropolitan Council . 4. Ordinances and Implementation - Section X Paragraph H - A new paragraph will be added related to the "relationship between Comprehensive Guide Plan and Zoning" as reviewed on June 10, 1980. Paragraph I - A new paragraph showing the "Implementation Schedule" will be added. JSV