The URL can be used to link to this page

04/21/1981 - City Council Regular Or AGENDA EAGAN CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING EAGAN, MINNESOTA CITY HALL APRIL 21, 1981 6:30 P.M. I. 6:30 - ROLL CALL & PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE II. 6:33 - ADOPT AGENDA AND APPROVAL OF MINUTES III. 6:35 - DEPARTMENT HEAD BUSINESS P• A. Fire Department Q.3 C. Park Department B. Police Department e A- C. Public Works Department IV. 6:55 - CONSENT ITEMS p �t A. Change Order #2, Contract 79-3 (Ches Mar East 1st, Utilities) 5 B. Contract 79-20, Final Payment/Acceptance (Duckwood Drive/Den- mark Ave. ) 5 C. Contract 80-17, Final Payment/Acceptance (Quarry Lane/1st Min- nehaha) D. Public Works Maintenance Equipment, Approve Plans & Specifications/ Order Advertisement for Bids (Road Grader) & E. Receive Petition/Order Public Hearing - Street Vacation (Erik's Boulevard) 01 F. Project 335/Receive Petition/Order Feasibility Report -- Twin Q View Manor 2nd (Streets & Utilities) e. 11G. Resignation - Eugenie Johnson, Receptionist Clerk CJH. Establish Date for Police Auction P' V. 7:00 - PUBLIC HEARINGS e. lb A. Project 334 - Pilot Knob Road Utility Services %S B. I.R. Bond Financing for Safari Mall in the amount of $3,801 ,000 VI. OLD BUSINESS \'IA. Bart Dunn for Rezoning from R-1 (Residential Single District) to R-2 (Residential Double District) located on Lots 1-7, Block 1 and Lots 1-7, Block 2, Overview Estates, Section 25 EAGAN CITY COUNCIL AGENDA APRIL 21, 1981 Page Two VII. NEW BUSINESS 'L 2 any for Preliminary Plat Approval (Tomark A. Tomark Development Comp Q Addition) located in the NW's of the NW's, Section 14 Carl Tollefson for Waiver of Plat inorder in Lot 1, Block 1, Order to Subdivide 6 e' duplex lots for single ownership loc Ches �Mar 5th Addition, Lot 2, Block 3, Ches Mar 1st Addition, Lots 'l &ove 11, Lots lh&s3 ,aBlock 4, Chesno � MarlstAddition , Lot Cedar G 2, Block 1, Cedar_.Grove 11. s� C. William Meade for waiver of plat in order to Subdivide a 5 acre Q parcel located in the SE'k of the NEk of Section 31. S 'ID. Sally Beauehemin for rezoning from R-1 (Residential Single Q District) to A (Agricultural District) (or a Special Use Permit) located on the South 625 feet of West 360 feet of Lot 5, Wilderness Retreat of the SE'k of Section 26 62 E. Coca—Cola Corporation for vCefrom height for anmindus�rial e and for variance from the parkingrequirements qurements Zoning District located on Lots 4-14, Block 7, Eagandale Center Industrial park in Section 3 7 3 F. Maureen Singleton for a temporary 3.2 non—intoxicating malt Q liquor license for May 2, 1981 for a garage sale at 2057 Bluestone G. Preliminary Plat for Joyce Addition a7� H. Call for I. R. Hearing on May 19, 1981, for Gresser, Inc. VIII. ADDITIONAL ITEMS '75 ADon Grant -- Concerned Citizen Q 7S B.. Wendell Widstrom -- Storage of Trucks VO C. Temporary Advertising Sign/Briar Hill ?�I-D. Extension on Truch Terminal/Lembke Addition -- Q$1,E. Special Assessment Committee Meeting of 3-31-81 Q JIF. Industrial Revenue Bond Placement/Terms of Amortizing g5 G. 1981 Fee Schedule Review tljSH. Weed Ordinance e'$Oki. Housing for Senior Citizens Q',gqJ. Contract 81-2, Plans & Specifications (Twin View Manor Streets) Contract 80-21, Receive Bids/Award Contract (Blackhawk Lake Outlet) IX. VISITORS TO BE HEARD (For those persons not on the agenda) X. ADJOURNMENT MEMO TO: HONORABLE MAYOR.AND CITY COLILMEMBERS FROM: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES' DATE: , APRIL 17 1981 SUBJECT: AGENDA INFORMATION MEMO After approval of the April 7, 1981 City Council minutes and minutes of three; (3) special City Council meetings, dated February 26, March 12 and March 19, and :approval of, the April 21, 1981 City r Council agenda, the following items are in order for consideration: FIRE DEPARTMENT A. Fire Department -- There are no 'items �,to' be considered for the Eire Department at this time. POLICE DEPARTMENT B. Police Department -- .Police Chief DesLauriers will `be' attending , the meeting at a ` later hour and would like to discuss with the City Council a request for additional funds for the 1981 operating budget. Chief of Police DesLauriers would like to request a meeting with the City Council to discuss funds for two (2) additional patrol officers. Please refer to the memo enclosed, on page , This item can be addressed during Additional Items at the en of the City Council meeting. 4 r "s S fit agate police DPment �ait .Martin DesLauriers 3830 Pilot Knob Road Chief of Police _ ` Eagan, Minnesota 55122 Jay M. Berthe Assistant Chief o j'Police 15 April 1981 TO : Thomas L. Hedges , City Administrator FROM: Chief of Police SUBJECT: Additional Funds for 1981 Operating Budget I would like' a meeting with the City Council to discuss a request for an additional $24, 850 in my 1981 operating budget. These funds are needed for two additional patrol officers , to promote the present two sergeants to the position of lieutenant, and to test and promote two patrol persons to the position of sergeant . This change is necessary in order to continue our response time , our clearance rate, patrol duties , and overall service to the citizens of Eagan. I am aware that in the past , I have been told not to return repeatedly to the City Council for additionl funds which were originally denied, however, I feel responsibile to try to make the council aware of the problems , both present and future, in our police department . I am 4 aware of the overall budget restraints placed on all city operations', but I think the citizens are concerned for their personal safety , that of their families and their property, and the citizenry expects a certain level of service from their police department . Due to the increased workload and because , in the past several years , each criminal act or violation (arrest) involves an increased number of manhours , the training of our officers has become more and more of a necessity and this consumes an increasing number of hours per officer . Your consideration and future discussion will be appreciated. a tin DesLaurie s MD/vk 2 THE LONE OAK TREE — THE SYMBOL OF STRENGTH & GROWTH IN OUR COMMUNITY AgendaInformation Memo K"N April 17, 1981 Page Two PARS DEPARTMENT C. Park Department .-_ ' Item #1: Director of Parks and Recreation Vraa was cotacted ;by representatives of the Meadowlark Ridge Apart- t.. meat complex on Meadowlark Lane asking if the City would accept a donation of wooden playground equipment located on their property. Mr.Vraa and the Park Foreman made an on-site inspection of the playground equipment and decided it would be of use to the Park & Recreation Department.. The equipment consists of two ( 2) slides, vertical ladder and swing series. In addition, there is a small merry-go-round included as a part` of the playground' equipment. According to the Park Director, the equipment stili has seven to eight years , of • usable life, and, therefore, he accepted . the equip- ment as a donation...l The City crews have I removed the equipment and are storing it at the Park Office`' until it can be relocated h. , to a City park. At the April 2, 1981 meeting' of the Advisory Parks & Recreation Committee, a conceptual site pian for relocating the , play round equipment to the Oak Chase ` Park was presented by the staff. The Advisory Park & Recreation Committee approved the loca- tion and concept plan .and is also recommending to the City Council that an additional $700-$900 be allocated from the , park site development fund to. provide for additional lumber, timbers, stain, sand, etc. , to facilitate the installation of the equipment. F ACTION' TO BE CONSIDERED ON TKE. MATTER: To either approve or dis- approve the allocation of $700-$900 of additional expenditures to facilitate they installation of equipment at Oak Chase Park. Xp �s h re t J Agenda Information Memo April 17, `1981 _ Page Three PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT w` D. Public Works Department -- As stated in the last City Council agenda packet, all PublicWorksitems will now be placed on Addi- tional' Items to allow more time for other Department Head Business or informal issues to be addressed by the City Council between 6.30 and 7.00 p.m. There are eight (8) items on the agenda referred to as Consent Items requiring one (1) motion" by the City Council. If there is * any item which the City Council would like .to discuss in further detail, that -item . should be removed from the Consent Items and placed' under Additional Items unless the discussion required is brief. This will allow the Mayor to proceed with Public Hearings. . as legally noticed at 7:00 p.m. CONTRACT '79-3 A. Change Order #2' for Contract 79-3 (Cher Mar East .lst Utilities) i - Change Order #2 for Contract 79-3 consists of four (4) parts described as follows: Part A: In lieu of monetary compensation for obtaining an easement tor construction of a storm sewer outlet and a7 drainage pond, the adjacent " property owner, required his pond to be dredged (add $31977. 50) . _ Part B: The developer did not complete his s .te grading to required sp�ecitications, extra ;depth .'by. the utility - contractor I was required ; to install sewer and water services to -the property line (add ' x Part C: Due to a change in alignment and size of the water main ` cr� ossl g under . Cliff Road, an increase' At, the' size of the casing/ carrier pipe was required (add $1,500) . Part D: This provided for the installation of 2-8" gate valves T eu 'of the originally designed 6" gate valves at the pressure reducing station (add $700.00) . The total impact of this- change o--rder_ and the contract amounts to a 'total of $14;17,7.50. All costs associated with this change order were incorporated in the contract amount and used for assess- ment purposes in September of 1980. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THE MATTER: To approve Change Order #2 to Contract 73-»3 (Ches Mar East 1st Addition,Utilities) in the amount of $14,177.50. a- .Agenda Information Memo April 17, 1981 Page Four s t CONTRACT 79-20 ` B. Contract 79-20 for Final Payment/Acceptance (Duckwood Drive/ Denmark. Avenue) -- The City has received a request for final payment from the consulting engineering firm along with the certification that the work was completed in conformance with the approved plans and specifications, , and all tests/inspections have been performed x . and verified by the City! s .maintenance division. The final contract amount is approximately 0.5% ($1,000) under- the revised contract amount. All costs, .arpaociated with this contract are the responsi- { bility .of the major street fund as this provided for the' oversizing of the collector street. . To approve the sixth and ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED � ON THE; 1�TTEI�...; final pay request for Contract 79- 0, '(1DucWood/Denmark Avenue Streets) to„ McNamara Vivant, Inc. , in; the amount 0f $1.8,652.41 and accept for perpetual maintenance'. r ` CONTRACT 80-17 C. Contract 80-17 for Final Payment/Acceptance (Quarry( Lane/First Minnehaha Addition Streets) --- The City has received a request for final payment from the City's consulting engineering firm along with the certification that all work was completed in conformance with the approved plans and specifications and all tests/inspections have been performed and verified by the, Citys maintenance division. The finalcontract oast underran the revioed contract amount 'by 7.4% ($71000) , All costs associated with this project will be : assessed at a future date. w, u �4 r„ ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THE MATTER: To approve the. sixth and final pay request for Contract 80-17 (Quarry 'Lane/First Minnnehaha -Addition Streets) toMCPamara Vvan.t .�, Inc. , in the '' amount of $5,464.67 and accept fpr perpetual ma�iAte ante. =: y . Agenda Information Memo " April 17, 1981 Page Five Y", ` ROAD GRADER - D. Public Works Maintenance Equipment, Approve Specifications and Order Advertisement for Bids for Road Grader. Approved in the 19$0 Budget was, the replacement of the existing 1965 Wabco 440H Road Grader due to experiencing exceptional high maintenance and repair costs for the' fi.fteen year old machine and its heavy " use requirement. It was previously discussed by Council that the existing unit would bei - retained as a backupunit rather than trade it in on a new machine purchase Financing for this new equipment acquisition is intended , to be handled through equipment certifi- cafes. After extensive review of the City' 9 , needs and available equipment, detailed specifications have been prepared and are now readyfor advertisement, i. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED.'ON THE MATTER: To approve the specifica- tions for the purchase,. of a new road grader, with a bid opening scheduled for 3:00 p.m. Thursday, May 14, 1981. STREET VACATION. - ERIK'S BOULEVARD" Ot .RICHARD LANE E Receive Petition/Order Public Hearing for. Street Vacation, of Erik's Boulevard and Richard Lane -- The City has, received a re- quest from Mr. Richard Strom to vacate `Richard Lane (Delores Lane to Cliff Road) and Erik' s Boulevard (Cliff Road to 700' south). The preliminary plat for Twin View Manor 2nd Addition was approved by the Planning Commission on July 8, 19809 with City Council approval on July 15-, 1980.. This plat requires the vacation of 1 the above referenced portions of Erik' s Boulevard and Richard Lane. Attached on pages through is a :location map showing both those portions o roadways to be, vagate& and the appoved layout of Twin View Manor 2nd ,Addition. A- 1 . ,affected property owners are in agreement with the petition. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THE , MATTER To receive the petition and order the public hearing for a . street -gacation for Richard " Lane and Erik' s Boulevard to be held on .May 19, 1981 . e :v Az, IL 1 is ; � l ow AV Ao is • 'o ' 1 'e i - to 3 ''Ae. - JY 1 so o' �s. to t- 13 `' e \ 1 ~ 1 O " -{ �e•11r v 1 JO { {11.0 00' +_ 0 17 0 ; e g 1 �1 1 o V o OOLORES LAME 3 120 , 462.0• {�jQ O cc Q _ •o _ ui • Z n 2 - V M W ( I SCALE I 'e 1 v v o DENOTES IRI 10 e ' 4 - � 4 = e I� e' s •0 5 b 400.g t 1 CG 1 t.d I 1 Is2A• �• to:d � co' � 12 — TWIN VIerW �•d. Knlie 8 , 2068 F ol PR OPO SED• 3.4? '0,�4 i T y �c T H 0 MAS 8 s ry8T,2lL hl 1 + AA 4" I , >" � ♦ 1 s ;f ti 2 0 AV x , jr ]< LA 14 1 t 66.02' 2 8 ol le If If ' ' 1 t r > Agenda Information Memo ,:. April 17, 1981 Page Six PROJECT 3351 F. Project 335; Receive Petition/Order Feasibility Report for ' Twin View Manor 2nr Addition (Streets and Utilities) -- On November 101 19803 the City received a written petition from Mr. Richard Strom requesting a..1, feasibility study to be prepared for streets and utilities within the Twin View Manor 2nd Addition. At that time, it appeared feasible to expand the feasibility report for Walden Heightsto incoporate" his proposed subdivision due to the compatibility of streets and utilities. However, the Walden' Heights plat appears to not be proceeding with its development time table required to combine bath subdivisions under -one project. Therefore, Mr. Strom wishes to proceed with his subdivision separately. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THE. MATTER: Toa receive the petition and order a feasibility report for Project 335 (Twin View Manor ` 2nd Addition Streets and Util.i,t es) i IGNATIrON - 'GENIE J©HWOW E. Resignation of Eugenie Johnson;, Receptionist- Clerk -- ,Action is in order to accept the, resignation,. . effective June' 26, '1981, for Eugenie Johnson *as the Police Dopartment reception cleric.. Eugenie Johnson stated ,-in her letter to the`City, "This termination is due to the facts; that I am , pregnant and expecting on July 14, 1981 .11 _ ACTION TO, BE CONSIDERED. ON THE MATTER: To accept the resignation of Eugenie Johnson, receptionist clerk and authorize the advertise- ment for a replacement. POLICE AUCTIQ__N, H. Establish Date for Police Auction. --- Chief of Police DesLauriers A is requesting authorization to hold the annual auction of bicycles and about twenty ,'{'20 -- other miscellaneous items as well as three 43) used ,squad cars. The date for the auction is May 30, 1981, at 10:00 a.m. Chief,'' of. Police. DesLauriers feels the used squad cars will bring more . money at an auction ' and asked for bids" to sell them. A minimum' bid amount will be established for each vehicle. r. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THE '#ATTER: establish the date for the Pollee Auction for May, 80,, 1981 at- 3:0:00' a.m. at the Eagan Police Department. Agenda Information Memo April 17, .1,981 PageSeven PROJECT 334 . 'A. Project 334 (P l©t Knob Road Utility Services) -- At the April 7, 1981 Council. -meeting., the feasibility report for Project 334 . gas officially presented to the City Council with a 'public hearing 1: . . scheduled for April 2All required notices were' published in the legal 'p' er and sent to the property 'owners affected.. Enclosed � : on pages through ��C+ » is a copy of ;thee feasibility roport. The Consu t g Engineer am or Public Works Director , will conduct the public hearing on Tuesday, r ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THE MATTER: To close the: public 'hearing and either approve or deny Project. 334, Pilat Knob Road (Utility' Services) . r t c p y I s' d r `sn ' n��e' 4K�� & A��/ Jow. G� Kernn R.Coad,P.E. w '< Keith A.Gordon. P.E. Otto G. Boncstroo,P.L. I homas E.Neves, P.E. p Rnb,,,l W. Rosene,P.E. Richard W. Foster, P.E. h-rFlh C. Anderlik, P.E. Robert G.Schuniehl, P.E. 2335 W. �,«..�sy�'L��.'��36 Bradford A. Lemberg, P.E. Afanin L. Sonala, P.E. pp 5/ '1 Ri,h.,d E. burner, P.E Donald C. Rurgardb P.F. ,71. /'rw�, M�nwMwla 55113 James C.Olson. P.E. Jerry A.Bourdon,P.E. Afork A.Hanson,P.L. PA....: 612-6364600 Charles A.£ricksnn Leo Af. Pawe/sky Olson If 1956 - 5th — 1981 Datid E. Olson Darid E. Olsen Preliminary Report on � nniversary' County Road 31 Utility Services Project No. 334 d� Eagan, Minnesota March 20, 1981 SCOPE: The Dakota County Highway Department will be improving Pilot Knob Road (County Road No. 31) during the 1981 construction season. As a part of this work, City utilities within the County right-of-way must be relocated or ex- tended as necessary to accommodate the planned grade and alignment changes. Previous feasibility studies prepared for Project Nos. 177 and 200 have exam- ined the various aspects of the improvement project relating to the roadway section, utility revisions and storm sewer. The purpose of this report is to examine the feasibility of extending utility service to those property parcels that are not presently provided with municipal sewer and water service. FEASIBILITY AND RECOMMENDATIONS: The extension of utility service to the properties described in this report is feasible. It is proposed that this work be incorporated into the County's construction by agreement with the City of Eagan. DISCUSSION: Several property parcels have been identified as having potential need for future sewer or �water service: The most opportune time to install these services is during the reconstruction of Pilot Knob Road. Should the opportunity to install these services during the Pilot Knob Page 1 3279a tl Road reconstruction be missed, it may be several years before the road will be allowed to be open cut and the costs to cut and patch the road will result in significantly higher construction costs. Following is a listing of the par- cels considered for sewer and water service: Parcel Estimated Identification Owner Proposed Work Cost* 10-00900-011-02 Martin E. Shields & Wife Add 8" DIP lead $ 4,510.00 1396 Lone Oak Road 10-01000-010-29 Martin E. Shields & Wife Add 6" DIP lead 4,625 00 1396 Lone Oak Road 10-00300-010-51 Brain A. Becker Add water service 1,170.00 2804 Pilot Knob Road Lot 3 of George C: Williams Add sewer & water 2,780-.00 Zehnder acres 2981 Pilot Knob Road service (Section 4) Lot 1 of Aloysius & Alice Mayers Add sewer service 1,61000 Treffle Acres 2971 Pilot Knob Road a (Section 4) Lot 2 of Robert L. & Alice Allen Add sewer service 1,610.00 Treffle Acres 1410 Skyline Road (Section 4) Lawrence T. & Rita J. Oster Add sewer service 1,610.00 Justine Oster 2865 Pilot Knob Road (Section 4) Lot 9 of John & Eunice Odink Add sewer & water 2,780.00 Highview Acs: 2855 Pilot Knob Road service (Section 4) Lot 1 of Allen J. & Baerbel Highview Acs; Drenc_khahn Add sewer & water 2,780,00 (Section 4) 2811 Pilot Knob Road service 10-00400-010-03 Samuel W. & Melba Johnson Add water service 1,170X0 2779 Pilot Knob Road TOTAL $24,645,00 * An overhead factor of 1.3125 was applied to the estimated construction cost to obtain the "Estimated Cost:" No cost for sewer service tap by Public Works Dept, was included, 3279a Page 2, EASEMENTS: All proposed construction will occur within right-of-way or con- struction easements which have been acquired by the Dakota County Highway De- partment. REVENUE SOURCES: It is proposed that all of the work proposed herein shall be assessed agianst the benefited property: Services Project Cost Revenue Balance Lateral $24,645 Lateral Assessment $24,645 - 0 - PROJECT SCHEDULE: Present Feasibility Report April 7, 1981 Public Hearing . April 21, 1981 Approve Plans and Agreement with County April 21, 1981 Construction Schedule Summer 1981 Assessment Hearing Sept. , 1981 First payment Due with Real Estate Taxes April, 1982 I hereby certify that this report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Registered Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. erry Bourdon Date: March 20, 1981 Reg,. No; 13841 Approved by: ,a Thomas A: Colbert, P.E. Director of Public Works Date: -�--�� Page 3, 3279a '3AdLO bib Z 10 I /A'sse� v Z Allclio a04, — �S0g2 4 'ONI NVE)V3 Q m° II 0 _ r��0 0 ° jr p ww JU W LLQ Z — W Z JEr M � Y ~ �.W J In _ O /1 Q _O N Z W J w On' �— I 1c) O I O Q mw J_ O J crZ W " W i '3A11 a Yom � o in Z r p � W `� ' z Y v 6°>j�b 15-010-00£00-GI I _ w c W g J m M tr z n. F- > i I Q °' O 0 / 1d I OO oN = A •= N03 W O '3AV M31 H O Y I 1L, E-q o _ I a z OVOH 5 AVO 3N -1 �P a ir Ile cr o a YQ N a o I O O I p I w O w 0 z z ' O O In O O O p p v O J O D 0 O w p o J m M O U M O = In i I � U I/ F ` Agenda Information Memo April 17, 1981 Page Eight t I.R. NOTE SAFARI MALL SHOPPING CENTER , B. L: R. Bond Financing for Safari Hall' `Shopping; Center in the Amount of $3,801,000 - - A public hearing is scheduled to consider industrial revenue (tax exempt financing) note for Safari Mall ". Shopping Center for the purpose of constructing an 83,000 square foot shopping centers generally referred to as Safari Mall Center. PP $ The sho in center will include a Red� Owl stare, a Snyder Brothers Drug and Coast to Coast, which re,present,22,400' square feet, 15,000 square I feet and 7,800. square feet, respectively. Small tenants would comprise approximately 37,800 square feet. For a copy of the pro forma regarding Safari. Mall, refer to page The A estimated payroll is $3,000,000 based on 200 new jobb addi- tional information relative to the tax exempt financing request, please refer to the attached document prepared by Rothchild Finan- cial Corporation. (No page numbers Y. This tax exempt financing. request is for% approval- of a preliminary resolution; and, therefore, the details regarding the placement of the mortgage note will be considered in -the future when the final resolution is presented to the City. Copies of the financial statements are also included with each of the documents as provided by Rothchild. The Informa- tion provided is consistent with that provided on previous tax exempt financing applications. 'If there is any additional informa- tion required by the City Council, please feel free: to contact f this office prior, to the meeting on Tuesday. This ,office has had some inquiries from residents of Woodgate as to< how` the bonds work and if there is any obligation to the tax, payers and they more than likely will be in attendance for thi's I.R. public hearing. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THE MATTER: To approve or deny . the I.R. financing in the amount of $3,801,000 for the Eagan Associates project for the purpose of const-ructing Safari Mall Center. E. ,, \ � }, �t x • • • 0 PRO FORMA SAFARI MALL - EAGAN, MINNESOTA INCOME Red Owl 22,400' 20 yrs. $3.90 $87,360 Snyder Bros. Drug 15,000' 15 yrs. $4.25 63,750 Coast to Coast 7,800' 10 yrs. , $3.25 25,350 45,200' 176,460 Small Tenants 37,800' 5-10 yrs. $8.00 302,400 TOTAL INCOME $ 478,860 r EXPENSES Management - 32% $ 16,760 Insurance 3,000 Repairs 5,000 Promotion 10,000 Vacancy - 5% Small Tenants 15,120 TOTAL EXPENSES $ 49,880 NET RENTAL $ 428,980 Agenda Information Memo April 17, 1981 Page Nine REZR! ING -- P©RTIQN OF OVERVIEW ESTATES .( A Bart Dunn for Rezoning from R-1` to R�2, located on Lots 1-7, Block 1, and Lots 1-7, Block 2, Overview Estates =- A public hearing r was held before the Advisory Planning Commission on March 24, 1981 to consider an application to rezone fourteen single family lots from the present R-1 under Planned Development to R-2 ,- Residential Duplex, zoning. The item was to be considered at the April 7, 1981 meeting; however, due to apparent misinterpretations by the residents as to. what was proposed by the developer, an informational meeting was encouraged allowing the developer and neighbors to meet and discuss potential design and impact of rezoning the single family lots to a duplex concept. Such a meeting was held at the City Hall on Wednesday, April 15, 1981. The developer and citizens ` were able to spend approximately two (2) hours discussing the pro- posed zoning and the effect it would have on the neighborhood area. There is 'a much better understanding as to what the developer is proposing as a result of this neighborhood meeting, though the neighbors still have some reservation as to whether the quality of the neighborhood would be enhanced by the construction of duplexes or smaller residential dwelling units. For information concerning the rezoning request, refer to the Planning Intern' s report found on pages � through Q For additional informa- tion regarding action taken by the ;° refer to those minutes, found on page . Tq ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON. THE MATTER: To approve or deny the recommendation of the APC to deny Che rezoning as proposed by Bart Dunn for lots in Overview Estates, t r a a CITY OF EAGAN SUBJECT: REZONING APPLICANT: BART DUNN LOCATION: LOTS 1-5, BIDCK 1, LOT 6, BLOCK 2, LOT 7, BLOCK 2, LOT '7, BIDCK 1, LOTS 1-5, BICC 2, LOT 6, BLOCK 1, EXISTING ZONING: OVERVIEW ESTATES, SECTION 25 R-1 (RESIDENTIAL SIN=)UNDER A PLANNED DEVEIDPPETT DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: MARCH 24, 1981 DATE OF REPORT: N%RC3 18, 1981 REPORTED BY: KURTIS G. ULRICH, PLANNING ASSISTANT APPLICATION SUBMITTED An application has been submitted to rezone 14 single family lots from the present R-1 under a planned development to R-2 (Residential Duplex Zoning) . COMMENTS TS The applicant has proposed the R-2 (Residential Double Zoning) in order to acax:modate a higher density of housing. This higher density became de- sirable after assessments levied in the fall of 1980 turned out to be al- most double what had originally been estimated. The proposal to move to a higher density of housing will act to spread out the assessments over a broader base of property owners, allowing for a smaller lot size and a smaller assessment per lot. Presently, the zoning of all adjacent property is PD (Planned Development) allowing for a Residential Single density. The proposal would change. the zoning frau a Residential Single density under a Planned Development to an R-2 Zoning District. If the rezoning is approved, it should be subject to the following condition. 1. The lots in question should be replatted in order,to accan cdate an R-2 (Residential Duplex) density and to allow for owner-occupancy of each dwelling unit. KGU/jac PRELIMINARY PLAT OF - OVERVIEw ESTATES REPLAT L 2 I — _2 y 3 oz io sr 42C0 fr s u u • s2-1 sr , ariasr -Y--_ ;ims• •. 4� ' 7 _ i .t�2:it i �; • a 2 ; 3 s S 6 7 ,N c •, [*70�f• [—JP:sr 2fLDlfr 11•A fr Z+.: j O / C 6a3 92 SW4 :I a N. P r— `�' .E as : ... . s[c» IrJCA'I'�`� •• ,i scc ie SE. 2' '•a�+ a;E 2! 1 , t r 17. el I C S A. H # W _ a AUDITOR'S SUED. �. z cr W - Y ~ SADDLE Ll Lrzf: n- i. HORN {mow CRS PD t CEP TiON ' O - ,:i +-��" f��`� �l^,,•�'�_ .•.lam-` 1 ••.��.. •; 'i t, .��.•.,'`:.i.'1•: a.', �,-_ .�'�;� ;� '� . .r,, - � X11^::� ,��..? ••l.•. ' '� n1. "1�,�{1:-�.^1�'.�•. '3.,,�t �.' ,Zv't _'••r•.+.. � '2'Z-r•1*/';' 17�''.��-',�17-i-i�� , � / �J '�-1z-,�.,y�,;��- :��'"�. �_�---^'`.LI •n�-� ��1�1 r4,�1`'r � Q /' �/ INCLUDED -p D PARK) `- , •�)_�' '_.-;��; OVERVIEW ESTATES REZONING — BARTON DUAN A public hearing regarding the application of Barton Dunn to rezone 14 single family lots from R-1 to R-2, Residential Duplex, in Overview Estates was next convened. Bart Dunn and Mark Dunn were present and reviewed the 2- 112 year old replat of Overview Estates requesting that Lots 1-7, Block 1, and Lots 1-7, Block 2 be rezoned. A number of adjoining property owners were present objecting to the application. Bart Dunn stated that the estimate for the assessment improvements was $6,900 with actual assessments of about $10,550, indicating that the assessments amounted to about 65% of the land value. The owners had suggested smaller lots, reduction in assessments or the revision to R-2 use. The engineering staff indicated utility services are adequate. The objections included the fact that the property had been repre- sented to be developed as R-1 and that there would be additional congestion including additional traffic. There is only one service per lot but the property is being served by a trunk line and two services could be installed. Wilkins moved, Gits seconded a motion to recommend denial because the property had originally been zoned for R-1 purposes, the neighboring property owners had assumed that R-1 uses would be developed on the property, and there are R- 1 homes basically surrounding the property, and the Comprehensive Plan indi- cates R-1 use. All voted yes except Krob who voted no. 2 I Agenda Information Memo April 17, 1981 Page Ten PRELIMINARY PLAT -- TOMARK ADDITION ;. A. Tomark Development Company for ',Preliminary Plat Approval of Tomark Addition - A public hearing was held before the Advisory Planning Commission at the March 18, 1981 meeting ;to consider an application for preliminary plat of TomarkAddition which consists of approximately , 37 .acres and contains approximately 43� dwelling units The applicant is requesting approval of the first phase which consists of approximately 10.6' acres and' contains 144 dwelling units. The Advisory . Planning Commission-, reviewed the drawings and reports by staff and is recommending approval of the preliminary plat to the .City Council. F6r additional information, refer to the City Planner's report, a copy` of which is 11enclosed on pages through For , additional information on the action to en by the A15(3, reter to those minutis 'found on pagesthrou h pr�� Also enclosed but not ,given a page number is -KOO scale minary plat drawing for. your review. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THE . MATTER; To approve or deny the action` of the Advisory Planning Commission recommending approval of the preliminary plat' entitled "T© ark Addition.". t F, CITY OF EAGAN SUBJECT: PRELIMINARY PLAT - T HARK ADDITION APPLICANT: ICM%M DEVELOPMENT CO. LOCATION: N6, OF THE NWh, SECTION 14 EXISTING ZONING: R-4 (RESIDENTIAL MULTIPLE DISTRICT) DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: MARCH 24, 1981 DATE OF REPORT: MARCH 18, 1981 REPORTED BY: DALE C. RU1Z<LE, CITY PLANNER APPLICATION SUBMITTED An application has been submitted for preliminary plat approval, Tomark Addition, which consists of approximately 37 acres and contains approx- imately 432 dwelling units. The applicant is only requesting approval of the first phase which consists of approximately 10.6 acres and con- tains 144 dwelling units. COrR"�"I'S This parcel which is being proposed has some history with the City of Eagan. It was in 1977-78 Mr. Leonard Juster presented a plat for this property which consisted of a combination of single family lots and multiple lots. The proposal requested to develop the first phase which would consist of single family lots that would be located just south of Yankee Doodle Road and abutting the Carriage Hills Golf Course. At that time, Ordinance 52, the Zoning Ordinance, allowed pyrimiding residential uses in an R-4 District. So the developer could, in fact, constrict single family lots in an R-4 District. When the plat was presented at the City Council, the Council denied the application based on the'fact that the Council did not think the location of single family lots located just south of Yankee Doodle Road and abutting the golf course was an appropriate use for that land. The reasons the Council felt this was an inappropriate use is the fact that it abutted Yankee Doodle Road which will carry a high volume of industrial traffic and it abuts the Eagandale Industrial Park directly on the northside of Yankee Doodle Road. Therefore, sane higher density would be a better use for buff- ering the industrial district than providing single family lots in this lo- cation. Mr. Juster challenged the City's recommendation, and this challenge went all the way to the Minnesota State Supreme Court. The Minnesota State Supreme Court upheld the City of Eagan's position that the single family dwellings should not be constructed at this location. 203 CITY OF E:�GATN PRELIMINARY PLAT - TOMARK ADDITION MARCH 24, 1981 PAGE TWO Presently, Tomark Development Co. has an option to purchase this property and construct condominium apartment projects which would ultimately contain 432 dwelling units. This thenis keeping with the City's intent to provide the buffering between the industrial district to the north and residential areas to the south. SITE PLAN AND PLAT REVIEW The overall project would consist of approximately 37 acres and contain 432 dwelling units. The applicant is proposing to phase the development over a couple of years. At the present time, the applicant is only requesting ap- proval on the first and second phase of the proposed project. The first and second phase would contain approximately 10.6 acres and contain 2 buildings, 144 dwelling units. The proposed structure would be a 3-story brick building and would contain 72 dwelling units. Each of the buildings would be broken dawn with 6-three bedroom units, 57 two-bedroom units and 9-one-bedroom units for a total of 72 dwelling units per building. The parking requirement for each building would be 180 parking spaces of which 72 would have to be covered parking, either garage or underground. The appli- cant is proposing underground parking for each of the buildings. The site plan shows approximately 20 parking spaces short of the 2.5 spaces per unit require- ment. Therefore, the site plan should be revised to shag the 180 parking spaces. Phase one and phase two contain 16% and 13.5% lot coverage respectively. Ac- cording to Ordinance 52, the lot size requirement for the proposed building allowing density credits is 4.7 net acres per building. The applicant is meeting this requirement. In the Corprehensive Guide Plan, the City has shown an active part for this neighborhood located Southeast of the Southeast corner of Carriage Hills Golf Course. Therefore, the staff at this time is not proposing any active park for this area. This item has not been reviewed by the Park Committee but will be placed on the April 2, 1981: Park agenda. The proposed development plan is showing two recreation areas for the develop- ment. The recreation areas contain outdoor swimming pool and tennis courts which would provide for the active needs for this development. The applicant is also proposing that som recreational area be provided in the southeast corner of the development. The area is proposed for additional ponding area for the 100-year storm. However, this ponding area would only be underwater for a very short time. Therefore, the applicant is also providing sem recrea- tional facilities for the development within this area. Along with the recrea- tional areas, sane tot lots provisions shall also be included. The overall plan appears to be well designed and all setback requirements and lot coverages are met for the overall concept. However, .only the first two phases are being proposed to be developed at this time. The remainder of the development will be platted as an outlot and will reappear on the Planning Cotmission and Council agendas when each phase develops. The overall circulation for the project is good with a looped street connecting to Yankee Doodle Road and Lexington Avenue. M 2 9' CITY OF EAGAN PRELLMINARY PLAT - TOMARK ADDITION MUCH 24, 1981 PAGE THREE The preliminary plat, Tomark Addition, is presently being platted in two lots and two outlots. Lot 1, Block 1 and Lot 1, Block 2 will be the location for the proposed condominium buildings. Outlot A is proposed for a portion of the looped street. The staff is recommending that Outlot A be dedicated as a public street with the plat instead of Outlot A. If approved, the plat should be subject to the following conditions: 1. Outlot A shall be changed to a public street dedication on the final plat. 2. That the plat be subject to Dakota County Plat C mission's review and comrents because the plat abuts County roadways. 3. A homeowner's association by-laws be reviewed by the City prior to final plat approval. 4. A detailed landscape plan be provided for Lot 1, Block 1 and Lot 1, Block 2, Tomark Addition, and an adequate landscape bond shall be pro- vided and not released until one year after the landscaping has been completed. 5. 180 parking spaces shall be provided for each condominium building and at least 72 of the 180 shall be underground parking. The parking area shall have an asphalt surface and concrete curbing shall be provided around the perimeter of the parking area. Each parking stall shall contain 10'-wide parking spaces. 6. The plat shall be subject to the Park Committee's recommendation for park dedication on this proposed development. 7. All easemr nts shall be obtained by the City which are required for the development. DCR/jac �s CITY OF EAGA_N PRELIMINARY PLAT - TOMARK ADDITION MARCH 24, 1981 PACE FOUR ENGINEERING RECONAvEZVDATIONS 1. Sufficient additional right-of-way must be dedicated to provide for a 55' half right-of-way adjacent to Kington Avenue (County Road 43) and Yankee Doodle Road (County Road 28) . 2. Drainage and ponding easements must be dedicated in the northwest cor- ner of the plat (DP-10) to incorporate the 860.0 elevation. In addi- tion, the drainage and ponding easement must be dedicated in the south- east corner of the plat (DP-9) to incorporate the 864.0 elevation. 3. Outlot "A" must be dedicated as public right-of-way with the platting of Blocks .1 and 2. 4. The internal street must be constructed to the south Line of Block 1 as a part of the first phase development. 5. Necessary permits must be obtained from the County pertaining to any grading within their right-of-way. 6. The revised grading plan must be submitted and approved pertaining to the proposed slopes along the east property line of this plat together with the required landscaping plan. 7. All outstanding area and lateral benefit assessments must be paid prior to the final plat if not covered under an existing City project as a pending assessment. TAC/jac T0: PLANNING CO"USSION, C/0 DALE C. RL'NKLE, CITY PUA.= FROM: THOMAS A. COLBERT, DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS DATE: MARCH 19, 1981 RE: PRELL=ARY PLAT - TOMARK ADDITION (TOMARK DEV.) Public Works Department has the following comments to offer in consideration of the above-referenced preliminary plat: UTILITIES Sanitary sewer of sufficient size and depth to handle this proposed devel- opment is available along the southside of Yankee Doodle Road. Watermain of sufficient size/pressure is available along the southside of Yankee Doodle Road and the west side of Lexington Avenue. These facilities were installed in 1971 under Project 58. GRADING/DRAINAGE Grading plan proposed is in conformance with City standards for street grades and side slopes with the exception along the eastern boundary adjacent to the golf course. Here the slopes are proposed to be 1.5:1. The grades should be revised to provide for minimum 2:1 slope with extensive landscape vege- tation in place of the desired 3:1 slope. All grading is proposed to be con- tained within the plat boundaries with the exception of minor grading within County right-of-way. This will require a County Highway permit. In the northwest corner of this proposed plat, the master corprehensive storm sewer plan provides for a 15.4 acre/foot storage capacity pond (DP-10) with a normal water .level of 848.0 and a proposed high water (100-year) elevation of 860.0. In its existing state, approximately 50% of this property drains to the nortt7,aest with the other half draining to the southeast. The ultimate plan provides for the ponding area in the southeast corner to drain to the northwest and ultimately north of Yankee Doodle and west of Lexington Avenue. These two ponding areas will have to be connected by way of an internal storm sewer sys- tem based on their proposed grading and development plan. This connection will be required with the second phase development of Outlot B, or when development occurs of the land south of this proposed plat. The City is presently studying the needs of the storm sewer outlet from O'Leary Lake, which is located south- west of this proposed development. This O'Leary Lake Outlet (Project 322) will require drainage through this plat to the northwest corner into the proposed ponding area (DP-10) . Although this pond in the northwest corner (DP-10) does not presently have a positive storm sewer outlet, it has sufficient capacity to handle the proposed first phase (Block 1 and Block 2) . S'TREET'S This development provides for an internal looped street providing access to County Read 43 (Lexingtn Avenue) and County Road 28 (Yankee Doodle Road) . These proposed intersections are located an adequate distance from the County Read 28/43 intersection. Th grade of this internal looped street is well within the requirement of the City. Its northerly portion of this in- ternal street to the south line of Block 1 will have to be constructed as a 2-7 PLANNING CCUMISSION TON r RK ADDITION - PUBLIC WORKS DEPARITT E T MARCH 19, 1981 PAGE TQO part of the first phase development. A temporary cul-de-sac will not be re- quired due to the availability of the parking lot driveway providing for the necessary "hammerhead" turnaround for maintenance vehicles. The continuation of this street must be constructed with any subsequent phasing. EASEtiENTS/RDW Additional right-of-way will have to be dedicated along Yankee Doodle Road (County Read 28) and Lexington Avenue (County Road 23) to provide for a min- imum 55' half right-of-way. A 60' public right-of-way for the internal street will have to be dedicated in conjunction with the phase development. Therefore, Outlot A should be dedicated as public right-of-way to provide for the required street construction with the first phase. A ponding easement must be dedicated in the northwest corner of this plat to provide for the necessary 15.4 acre-feet of storage capacity which will in- corporate the 860.0 elevation contour (DP-10) . In addition, the ponding easement will have to be dedicated in ti,e southeast corner of this plat to incorporate the 864.0 elevation contour (DP-9) . All other comnon and required drainage and utility easements should be dedi- cated. ASSESSMENTS This parcel has received its sanitary sewer and water trunk area assessments under Project 58 in 1972. It is still respcnsible for its trunk storm sewer area assessment which will be required either with the final plat or under Project 322, whichever occurs first. Lateral benefit from trunk watermain along Yankee Doodle and Lexington Avenue together with lateral benefit from trunk sanitary sewer along Yankee Doodle Road only will be required as a condition of the final plat, or in conjunction with a future City project if so petitioned for by the developer prior to final plat. I will be available to discuss in further detail any of these items at the Planning Cormission of March 24th, 1981. Respectfully submitted, Thomas A. Colbert, P.E. Director of Public Works TAC/jac s . r i r IS. • •rTLOT ----- I. dp 11 WIVI w z • Z n > r p > LL 8 C w .� i I •1. C z PRLLIMINARY PLAT _ R -1091 lames R Hill, a is TOMAAK IST ADDITION _ - -__ s� M ARK �o. �— R'��NC AND EIS.'MERINC COPP&XTANT 7rrf OMrr uwr [Dr•.r•. r.•rr T[LL rr.-erN __ 'S-"' amHLMWyDTAw"Sa • uoo...x_-Taw .r« pear !-IryANZ ds J00 ELI �t cmc doom Kim . . . .. Ira 111111 RF ' jff,4 I MPH _A_, glop t No 1•. a &M-M Vil ils I EYE MEN li vm_ m RE EWEN I SEEM M RUN HimME l9VI EMEMS EMEMMEME MMMMKUmmm MESH 101 M �I EMS Ems MINE MONESEEM . II F'� 6 P OIL' • � ` � � r" a+: � l ' �¢ f 4 ( . N m m -f_ s 33 �s PRELIMINARY UTILITY PLAN _ Ut'1' R- Hill, he r � TOMARK CONDOMINIUMS - - J`" •`^'es 1" KAN NSG APD ENC&4ERMG CONSULTANT j TOYA/IK OlYROM10fT M _ n. mD nwANam+q+ai SOUTH - aoO..+CTO'N w« : TOO*OWNS LAW* IDINk■L 116416 TR6•s�dv/f �•—A•— Nc pro - -'^�•� ire LA "�."ti ...... . 1. Jl.• •.ti. ''�•. r'•r' '.�•'♦�� .l .. r. f y:= �. . .V f� i� 1 r t t •f, `• l i r CE I YANKEE DOODLE ROAD On +�► 28/ :,: [• li II� �I l 1 f / / i 1 'i (I I� t. C r:J•'.�.`'Y. {''•C�,t ! ��+i/�{ ' 1 I I I i I� l•l i � � WESCOTT GARDEN 4- 1 :` i a 1 �` :►�: r (' + t .r''r~fit j :•:•: :\C_\�. .�fj it �; t j . <;r r t` l r t' I D `r• 1-7 _v i\ -- _ - __ _ - _ 0T ; R AD% i ' t I � - TMA" ADDITION PRELIKINARZ PLAT The public hearing regarding the application of Tomark Development Com- pany regarding preliminary plat approval of Tomark Addition consisting of approximately 37 acres with 432 dwelling units was next convened by Chairman Joe Harrison. The first phase; consisting of approximately 10.6 acres and containing 144 dwelling units is the immediate plan for development. Mr. James Hill and a representative of Tomark were present. It was noted that a Portion of the parcel was proposed to be rezoned for R-1 use in 1 977 and and after the Council had denied the request in changing the use, the case l978 was contested by the property owner resulting in a favorable decision from the Minnesota Supreme Court in early 1980 denying the change in use from R-4 zoning to R-1 use. Mr. Hill indicated the overall density would be 12-112 units per acre, there would be two swimming there would be FHA and VA financing with an average nof $58,000 sale priceperd four tennis courts, r unit. The completion schedule would be on a five the builder for the proposed condominium units. year basis with Landtech, the oak trees be Member Hall requested that preserved if at all possible in the swale area and recom- mended the Council consider a variance if necessary from setbacks for the first condominium buildings in order to preserve the trees. No tot lots were provided but it was recommended that tot lots be included in the final plat. Harrison moved, Hall seconded the motion, all membersvoted in favor to ap- prove the preliminary plat of Tomark Addition subject to the following condi- tions: 1. That the plat be subject to Dakota County Plat Commission's review and comments because the plat abuts County roadways. 2. The homeowner's association by-laws be reviewed by the City prior to final plat approval. 3• A detailed landscape plan shall be provided for Lot 1, Block 1, and Lot 1, Block 2, Tomark Addition, and an adequate landscape bond shall be provided and not released until one year after the landscaping has been com- pleted. 4. 180 parking spaces shall be provided for each condominium building and at least 72 of the 180 shall be underground parking. Thearea shall have an asphalt surface and concrete curbing shallbe providednaround the perimeter of the parking area. Each parking stall shall contain 10' wide parking spaces. 5. The plat shall be subject to the Park Committee's recommendation for park dedication on this proposed development and APC recommended that the Park Committee review and recommend tot lots. 6. All easements shall be obtained by the City which are required for the development. 3S 7. That sufficient additional right-of-way shall be dedicated to provide for a 55' half right-of-way adjacent to Lexington Avenue (County Road 43) and Yankee Doodle Road (County Road 28). 8. That drainage and ponding easements shall be dedicated in the north- west corner of the plat (DP-10) to incorporate the 860.0 elevation. In addi- tion, the drainage and ponding easement must be dedicated in the southeast corner of the plat (DP-9) to incorporate the 864.0 elevation. 9. That Outlot A shall be dedicated as public right-of-way with the platting of Blocks 1 and 2. t 10. That the internal street shall be constructed to the south line of Block 1 as a part of the first phase development. 11. That necessary permits shall be obtained from the County pertaining to any grading within their right-of-way. 12. That the revised grading plan shall be submitted and approved per- taining to the proposed slopes along the east property line of this plat together with the required landscaping plan. 13. That all outstanding area and lateral benefit special assessments shall be paid prior to the final plat if not covered under an existing City project as a pending assessment. 14. That if necessary to preserve existing trees, that variances be granted to move the building on Lot 1, Block 1, to the east. All voted in favor. 36 Agenda Information Memo April 17, ;1981 Page Eleven r WAIVER Or PLAT DUPLEX LOTS IN CHES MAR, $ CEDAR GROVE B Carl Tol.lefson for Waiver of Plat in Order to Subdivide Six Duplex Lots for Single Ownership, Located in Various Lots and Blocks in Ches Mar and Cedar Grove Additions A public hearing was held by the Advisory Planning Commission at their last regular meeting held on March ' 24, . 1081 to consider 'a waiver of plat application to subdivide L s;ix (6) duplex lots for single ownership located in Lot 1, Black .1, Ches 5th Addition- Lot 2, Block 3, Ches Mar ^ 1st Addition;, Lots 1 -& 29' Block 2, Ches Mar 5th Addition; Lot 1 , Black 2, Cedar Grove tl Lots I & 3, Block 4, Ches Mar 1st Addition- and Lot 2, Block 1, ;Cedar Grove .1i. The Advisory Planning Commis- "sion is recommending, approval of the waiver of plat to the City Council. For addltiI information on the matter, please refer to the Planning Inttrn.'s report found on pages 38 through 44 For, additioual inforMation regarding action Eaken by the APC, refer to .thosemites., found on page • = ACTION`, TO BE CONS IDEM ON < THE MATTER: To either approve or deny the recommendation of the Advisory Planning' Commission to approve the waiver of plat for the various- Lots as described. 4 v , 6 jF r , c l c • s CITY OF EAGAN SUBJECT: WAIVER OF PIAT APPLICANT: CARL TOLLEFSON LOCATION: LCT 1, BLOCK 1,CHES MAR 5TH,LOT 2,BIOCK 3, C HES MAR 1ST, LOTS 1&2,BIOCK 2,CSS MAR 5TH,LOT 1,BI OCK 1,CEDAR GROVE 11,LOTS 1&3,BLOCK 4,cHES MAR 1ST,LOT 2,BLOCK 1,C DAR GROVE 11 OF THE NA OF THE NA OF SECTION 27 AND SECTION 20 EXISTING ZONING: R-2 (RESIDENTIAL DUPLEX) DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: Nei 24, 1981 DATE OF REPORT: MARCH 18, 1981 REPORTED BY: KURTIS G. ULRICH, PLANNING ASSISTANT APPLICATION SUBMITTED An application has been submitted for a waiver of plat to allow for the sub- division of 8 duplex lots for separate ownership of each duplex unit with lot. CONTENTS 1. The lots in question currently all contain one duplex upon a single lot. The proposal is to split each lot to allow for separate ownership of each duplex unit with lot. 2. Each of the newly-created lots would meet all ordinance requirements applicable to the R-2 zoning designation. 3. The proposed lot splits would not negatively inpact the character of the neighborhoods and would encourage owner occupancy of the dwelling units. 4. In the past, other similar waivers of plat have been granted in the Ches Mar and Cedar Grove neighborhoods. 5. Separate utility lines are currently provided to each unit. If approved, the waiver should be subject to the following conditions: 1. All property shall retain the existing drainage and utility easements. 2. Each of the newly-created lots must meet all applicable ordinance re- quirements. KGU/jac F. C. JAC SCSON YONLAND SUIRNEV ". ., REOISTERED UNDER LAKs OF STATE OF tlINNESOTA �{ rr• � �.,, ,r, • LJCEHSED r OROINA scs or CITY cw ontavEApaus x s,r secs sAsT aatm sTwsrr35411 -3444 1.0 AL , � t F F i " ..�► �� i ,r i �/ �p' n Spy fi G ' 1 HEREWY CERTIFY THAT THE ASOVE W A TRUE AND CORRECT RAT OF A SURVEY OF Lit 1,Block 1,Ches Her Fifth Addition, Daiwta County,Kinaesota. As sURV[Yto sY WE TNIL 3rd. DAY Or Apri •O• 1979 F. C. JACKSON. MiNNtsCT/1 LaisTRArmu. No. 36W .k. • F. C. JACKSON L-AP40 SURVEYOR REGIGTERCO UNDER LAWS OF STATE OF MINNESOTA . r UCENSED SY ORDINANCE OF CITY OF MINNEAPOLIS • _ ,,c rD rr 9616 EAST 55TH STREET 55417 727-3484 *urbtpor*o Cntiftatt { r N a I HERESY CERTIFY THAT THE ASOVE IS A TRUE AND CORRECT/RAT OF A SURVEY OF Lat 1.Alack 2.Ches alar Fifth Additlion, Dakzta Caunty.Minnesota. As suRvEYEo sY IPE THIS—_8tk•__DAY OF—!• TV A.D. 197$ SioNc F F. C. J CKSON. MINN 7 `REGISTRATION, NO. 3600 fw '4�_ F. C JACKSON LAND SLRVEYOR 1 REGISTERED UNO[R LAWS OF STATE OF MINNESOTA , LICKM6ED Elf ORDINANCE OF CITY OF MtNNEAPOLts - 3616 EAST 35TH STREET 55417 ! I j 727-3484 I� _ OnOtpor's oCcriificait IV C J � , r mar yt � _9'__ - I HERBY CERTIFY THAT THE ABOVE IS A TRUE AND CORRECT PLAT OF A SURVEY OF Lat 3,Bl3ck 4,Cttes MAr,First Additian, Dakata Caunty,Minnesota. n L As SURVEYED By ME THIS 7t"'_DAY of Aug. A. 1978 Revised Feb, 7tu. 1979 SIGN[ F. C J CKSON. MINNE60T, GMTKATION. NO. 3600 41 -frail era • lr F. C. JACKSON _ LANA: 6URVEYOR REGISTERED UNDER LAMS OF /TAT[ OF MINNESOTA _ UCENSED BY ORDINANCE OF CITY OF MINNEAPOLIG 6 = 1- ✓J N, 3616 EAST SSTN STREET55417 727-3484 *urbtpor's ICtrtiflatt t � � ` �. �-rn►7-may'-r�-a�rr7 � t q�V � t L fiZ) jsed 7 0, N 6p;i K 1 HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE ABOVE IB A TRUE AND clbRRECT A.AT OF A SURVEY OF Lot 2,31ack 2,Ctws Mar Fifth Addition, Dakota Caunty,KLnnes3ta, As SURYEYEO BY ME THIS 2nd, DAY OF Aug A.D. 1978 Revised Jan. 19ti. 1979 SIGNED. d- F. C. JACKSON, MINNESOTA RE}tlsTmAT". No. 3600 42. .(I it F. C. JACKSON LAND SURVEYOR R[O1ST[A[D UNDER LAWS OF STATE OF MINNCSOTA LICENSED BY ORDINANCE OF CITY OF MINNZAPOLIS 3616 EAST saTH STREET 55417 ---"'�— 727-.3484 i Sprbrpoc'� 6rctifiult � e o, ��' ��, ox Qj e � � R Ll i 1 N[R[SY C[RTIFY THAT THE ASKIV[ 19 A TRUE AND OORRECT PLAT OF A SURVEY DF Lot 2,Block 3,Ches !Sar First Addition, `�J f Dakota County,Minnesota. Jan. AS SURV[YED MY ME TNII.__23rd. _.DAY OF1978 F. C. 7(ACKSON. MINN[SOTA 201ITRATION. No. 3600 43 ,� \ F. C. Jo!*CKSON LANO SURVEYOR .REGISTERED UNDER LAW* OF STATE OF MINNESOTA / i LICENSED BY ORDINANCE OF CITY OF MINNEAPOLIS 3616 EAST 35TH STREET js417 727-34.34 ,( f-) r v � *untpor's Ctrtif catt -------------- x� 3 HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE ABOVE IS A TRUE AND CO"ECT RAT OF A 9URVEY OF i 1 i Lot 1,Block 4,Ches 'Ur First Additi,3r, Dakota County,Minaesota. As suRVEYED Br ME THIS. 9th. DAV GF April A.D. 1979 F. C. JACKSON. MINNESOTA STRAT$OM. No. 3600 r .. ilv F. C. JACKSON uxa suRvcro�e REGISTERED UNDER UWS OF STAT[ OF MINNESOTA LICSMS9D r ORaNANC= OF CITY OF MINR9APOUB -: 3 2616 EAST 55,rm STREET 55417 �---� 727-34" - �at7rcpsc'�c ICtstifitait _ — - 31� ! '� 0 Z: r 0 p o s c d NN, v 1 NERESY CERTIFY TNA THE ASOYE IS ARUE AND 00 9C FLAT OF A SURVEY OF 1 L*t 1,Black L.Cedar Grove N3. 11, Dakota County,Ninnesata. p As SURVEYED SY M[ TNts 20th. DAY OF_Dec. 1977 Revised Jan. 18th. 1978 SIGNiid F. C. JACKSON. MINNESOTA [GISTRATION. NO. 3600 i ..� a , . .eYiJ1I � • r� ,v ,. I76-b F. C. JACKSON LAND SURVEYOR RZOISTERED UNDER LAW{ OI {TAT[ Or YINNE{OrA UUNfED By ORDINANCE OF CITY of YINN[ArOLI{ ' = 1 �"� h 727-34$ 3516 EAST 5STN STREET 55417 � 4-48 4 ^ � $urbcpor'�c �cth�tcaUc e, at• sz .3? 1 � �� I � trod oSC 1 'Iw' ff l { � '4'�' 22.Jj t 1 HERESY CERTIVY THAT THE A{OV[ IS A TRU[ AND CORRECT PLAT OF A SURVEY OF a Lot 2,Block 1,Cedar Grove No. 11, Dakota County,Minnesota. As suRvEYEo By YE TMIs-4th. DAY a Mov. A.0 1976 2d-27-23 Z F. C. JACKSON. MINN[{OT ISTRATION. No. 3800 r :: a:• ter ' ' LA r i 4 BELL UT �A AAE Q Te.. vi•. . . � ( `.,'/ � Ali! il" /� � � '• � '• '�:�:�' � f t I •t 1 ` ff r!'�: t �_Q`'rr. '.� `' ISI I�I�II ��!!I• ., � ,�, _ 1 �iil' lil it iI� � r v• �-�� .� t �� ,• Mt f; t. w IID' f =*�\ QA "7 ` J IA �..� ,. •fes• . ;-. I iit�i.�tN�E / T�*'�'1�„ •Ih 4'F.� r�L'r"'�'� -.�.�-�::Y. � ... f:' - ylFtif�l r�.��:��;��,:.�. ::•j� /� � �' `�� -t-�.l j �?n} ��'r[�• � T r_,�j �.�.:•��.:.•moi,-r: ;, !: _ IGH S3 :_ �" �"; .ZJ' ' /•• Lam. T _T -- _ / O. I sc R4 Cv , al P ID t •1: •% w . R4 NOPTHERN s`tQYlLS PQW R ��+ ��- :� ' . .. .. . . . . . . � rill Iii' 11:• / LAI V. U Z I • Y: J ,, GAI a11 ,,,, , A. H. # 130 .. . . . . . . P low PD UTILITY /c '"FMc ic \o4 rr 32 `�. �.,��, f: cr f, .: �,Y X !F c F� f.c•' 1- WAIM OF PLAT -- CARL TOLLEFSON The hearing regarding the application of Carl Tollefson requesting waiver of plat to allow subdivision of eight duplex lots for separate ownership of each duplex unit was convened by the Chairman. Mr. Tollefson was present and there were no objections to the application. The lots in question each contain one duplex on a single lot and the request that each lot be split was to allow separate ownership. Staff recommended approval on the basis of the approval of previous applications of this type. Mr. Tollefson indicated that the homeowner's association will be set up for each of the locations and that he had no objections to the City approving the homeowner's association by-laws. Krob moved, Gits seconded a motion to approve the application subject to the following conditions: 1. All property shall retain the existing drainage and utility ease- ments. 2. Each of the newly created lots must meet all applicable ordinance requirements. 3• That the homeowner's association by-laws shall be subject to staff review and approval. All members voted in favor. 41 Agenda Information Memo April 17' 1981 Page TwelVe a WAIVER OF PLAT - 'WILLIAM MEADS C William Meade for Waiver of Plat in Order. to Su ivide a Five Acre Parcel -- A public hearing, was held by the Advi ory Planning Commission at their. March 24, 1982 meeting to consider an applica- ton for waiver of platin order to subdivide a f ivc acre parcel located in Section 31.' The APC is recommending aproval of the waiver of plat'. to the City Council. For additional information, r refer• to the Planning Intent's report fund on pages ) through For additiona'1 > nformation on the action take __Bythe APC, r Rl to those minutes., a copy of which is found on page ACTIONTO BE CONS ID ON' THE MATTER: To e i the r approve or deny the recommendation of the .Advisory Plan;& Commission to approve the waiver of plat as :.presehted. 4 q } ISO S I wP , CITY OF EAGAN SUBJECT': W IVER OF PLAT APPLICANT: WILLIAM MEADE LOCATION: SE; CF THE NE% CF SEC'TICN 31 EXISTING ZONING: R-1 (RESIDENTIAL SIN= DISTRICT) DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: MARCH 24, 1981 DATE OF REPORT: 14AM 18, 1981 REPORTED BY: KURTIS G. =CH, PLANNING ASSISI APPLICATION SUBMITTED An application has been submitted for a waiver of plat in order to subdivide a 5-acre parcel located in the SES of the NE4 of Section 31. Cc"4 TI'S The applicant has proposed to split a 37,450 square foot lot fran a 5.08 acre parcel which previously received preliminary plat approval as the Meade Addi- tion November 16, 1979. In April of 1980, a request was made to extend the final plat with the understanding that all conditions of the final plat would be satisfied prior to March 31, 1981 or the preliminary plat would became in- valid. The applicant has indicated that the Meade Addition as indicated in the Preliminary plat is not feasible to develop. It is the intention of the applicant at this time to divide off of the preliminary plat a saleable lot upon which a single fmnily residence is currently located. It is the recr miendation of the staff that the applicant revise and submit the final plat separating the 37,450 square foot lot in the northeast corner of the Meade Addition and designating this as Lot 1 Qf Meade Addition, and the remainder of the Meade Addition be called an outlot. A revised final plat of Meade Addition should be subject to the following conditions: 1. A 60-foot wide street and utility easement shall be provided along the entire length of the western boundary of the proposed Lot 1, Meade Addition. 2. At time of development, the proposed outlot of Meade Addition shall be replatted. The proposed Lot 1 would take access from Pin Oak Drive. 3. The existing house shall meet all setback and ordinance requirements. 4. All drainage and utility easements shall be approved by the City Planner. 5. No direct access shall be allowed onto Cedar Avenue. 3101 • • CITY OF EAGAN WILLIAM MEADE - 4T'-IVER OF PLAT MARCH 24, 1981 PAGE TWO 6. The plat should be reviewed by the Dakota County Plat Ccgmlissicn and subject to the Dakota County Plat Camtission's ccments. 7. The park dedication for the proposed addition should consist of a cash donation for the parcel according to the current park dedication policy. KGU/jac ENGINEERING RECOMMEN lATICNS 1. Lateral benefit frau sanitary and watermain shall be collected or assessed as a condition of this lot split or subsequent final plat approval. 2. Adequate driveway and utility easements must be dedicated to provide access to the newly-created parcel in the northeast corner of this 5-acre parcel. 3. The existing house and the newly-created lot shall be required to make connection to the existing sanitary sewer and watermain. TAC/jac S� 70: PLANNING COMMISSION, C/0 DALE C. RUNKLE, CITY PIANNER FROM: THOMAS A. COLBERT, DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS DATE: MARCH 19, 1981 RE: WAIVER OF PLAT - WILLIAM MEADE Public Works Department has the following canments to make on the above-referenced proposed waiver of plat: STREETS AND UTILITIES Inproved street, sanitary sewer, watermain and storm sewer facilities of suffi- cient size and depth to handle this proposed lot split are immediately avail- able along Pin Oak Drive adjacent to the north line of this 5-acre parcel. EASaMEN TS This proposed lot split conforms with a previously-approved preliminary plat, "Meade Addition". During the installation of utilities for the Vienna Woods Addition along Pin Oak Drive, utility services for this future addition were stubbed to the north line of this 5-acre parcel., With this lot split, it is recommended that an adequate driveway and utility easement be dedicated to provide access to the smaller parcel frau these stubbed utilities and antici- pated driveway access location. ASSESSMENTS This parcel has been assessed for sanitary, water and storm sewer trunk area charges in the past. However, they have not been assessed for sanitary sewer and/or water laterals although this property is serviced with them. There- fore, it is recommended that lateral benefit from trunk for sanitary and water be assessed against the 383' of frontage along Pin Oak Drive (323' if future 60' road right-of-way is dedicated with this waiver) . This assessment should be due and payable as a condition of this waiver approval or future final plat approval. I will be available to, discuss in further detail any questions or concerns pertaining to this proposed waiver at the Planning Cammi.ssion Meeting of March 24th, 1981. Respectfully submitted, Thomas A. Colbert, P.E. Director of Public Works TAC/jac s3 r�' tri 100, • ` }• 1.. .. r1000 I+.. -s. :_- 114 I �! 1 � 1 kj � O h �R=b 1 t r ell / 1 ti co e ' r I 1 l �IIII f n I •.WI I �� Il�ll�lii �, _. :.,�cS`�•� � � li'i� �• � �� '! �'��r't I III!. ��I illllji� �lil�' I ori : :A2 a. po UJIt -t if 0 RIVERj�- �► TEST ENTER rr SIG NANT p p PA94E 4- \ 1 ,. SLAT , / //i J?�7 ��, .�.� , AC y; I t, I ,�, APPLE �Q VALLEY • MEADE ADDITION -- WAIVER OF PLAT The hearing regarding the application of Mr. and Mrs. William Meade for waiver of plat in order to subdivide their five-acre parcel on Cedar Avenue and Pin Oak Drive was next convened. Mr. and Mrs. Meade were present and explained the background of the preliminary plat that had been approved by the City Council on November 16, 1979. Because of the cost of fill material it was requested by the applicants that they be permitted to split off the parcel where the residence is now located, but the staff recommended that the appli- cant revise the plat and separate the residential parcel with the balance being platted as an Outlot. Gits moved, Hall seconded the motion to recommend approval of the revision to the preliminary plat with the house with a resi- dential lot, Lot 1, the remainder of it as an Outlot and subject to the following conditions: 1. A 60-foot wide street and utility easement shall be provided along the entire length of the western boundary of the proposed Lot 1, Meade Addi- tion. 2. At time of development, the proposed outlot of Meade Addition shall be replatted. The proposed Lot 1 shall take access from Pin Oak Drive. 3. The existing house shall meet all setback and ordinance requirements. 4. All drainage and utility easements shall be approved by the City Planner. 5. No direct access shall be allowed onto Cedar Avenue. 6. The plat shall be reviewed by the Dakota County Plat Commission and subject to the Dakota County Plat Commission's comments. 7. The park dedication for the proposed addition should consist of a cash donation for all lots according to the current park dedication policy for the outlot when the plat is resubdivided. 8. Lateral benefit from sanitary and watermain shall be paid or assessed as a condition of this lot split or subsequent final plat approval. 9. Adequate driveway and utility easements shall be dedicated to provide access to the newly created parcel in the northeast corner of this 5-acre parcel. 10. The existing house and the newly created lot shall be required to make connection to the existing sanitary sewer and watermain. Mr. and Mrs. Meade did not object to the recommendations of the staff or of the Planning Commission. All voted in favor. S-6 Agendas Information Memo April. 17, -1981 Page Thirteen µ : REZONING. - SALLY 'BEIM D. sally BeIauch,emi for Rezoning frczm' R=1 a A `'or Special Use Permit for her Property located in the Wilderness Retreat Area A public hearing wa's held before the Advisory 'Planni g Commission at their last regulax :meeting .held on March 24, 1981, to consider an application to rezone .approximately 5.17 acres from , R-1 to A, decribed as the South, t25 feet of the West 360 feet o Lot 5, W l- derness Retreat in,-the SES of Section 2b.. The Advisory Planning Commission is 'reco,a m riding issuance of :a special use ermit• rather than rezoning for consideration by the City Council. Enclosed' on pages through h is a copy� of "the Planning Intern' s report,, for your refereance. so enclpsed on' page , is a copy of� the. APC minutes. e City -P nr r `has a , ith r eauchemin to discuss certain conditions if a speci& use .,.permit is considered. Those conditions are as follows. u 1. The special permit`shall be appro omd ,for a "'five (5) year period and if no :problems >have arises :t shall be continued on a five (5) year basis.. - ., 2 There shall be no 'more' than theme { } horses and one (1) goat allowedon the prooperty _at, any given time. 3. �If there are any annoyances o.£ amell fr©m the d posit of the animals, the applicant shall remove the refuse from the property. ACTION TO .BE CONSIDERED ON THE. M&TTW Toiapprove or deny the action of the APC ` recommending approval of a- special , use permit subject to' certain conditions. r , . yak,r , > t k` 1 n CITY OF EAGAN SUBJECT, REZONING APPLICANT: SALLY BEAUCH= LOCATION: S625 FEET OF W360 FEEL' OF LOT 5,WIIDERNESS RETREAT OF THE SE4 OF SECTION 26 EXISTING ZONING: R-1 (RESIDENTIAL SINGLE) DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: MARCH 24, 1981 DATE OF REPORT: MARCH 18, 1981 REPORTED BY: KIWIS G. ULRICH, PLANNING ASSISTANT APPLICATION SUBMITTED An application has been submitted to rezone approximately 5.17 acres from R-1 (Residential Single District) to A (Agricultural District) . WIVE'NTTS The applicant has indicated that the Agricultural Zoning designation is desired for the purpose of stabling two horses. Under the present R-1 (Residential Single District) the stabling of horses is allowed only upon the issuance of a special permit by the City. There is presently a single family hone located upon this parcel. The appli- cant proposes to construct an additional structure with the approximate di- mensions of 24 x 48 feet for the purpose of stabling horses. Upon reviewing the application sutmitted, the planning staff reccm. nds that the applicant receive a special permit for the proposed use. A special per- mit would enable the City to control the future use of the land to a great- er extent than if a rezoning to Agticultural was granted. Section 52.07, Subdivision 3 of the Zoning Ordinance states that an' Agricultural District would permit "all types of agricultural pursuits and accessory farm struc- tures" within this presently-zoned R-1 District. A renewable special per- mit situation would allow the City the discretion to cancel this particular permitted land use at the time they felt was appropriate. A special per- mit can be made renewable upon a 1-year, 2-year or some other acceptable time frame basis. A special permit will also allow the City to stipulate the number and type of animal allowed to be kept on the parcel. Conversely, if the rezoning was allowed, the City would not be able to control the ag- ricultural uses in this regard. KGU/jac s .,'' � . / OAO O n z v � _z �3236� 'o 3" G Y 17 L4 > - N _- l �89 -5 �. O ? w O tis � � u .1+ 330 32 _ v m r 10 r w m _ _ a L N 248 77 - m i ' v+ o t+ - 4L e r 3 C IC m 265 31 - - -- 1-- - OD s , z c ;• F /� t -c° PD 26 T Ti ,"! %'1. •• t ( � 1. '. X t "}�� Z '• � ��.Z ,,:..�1?.,.,r +- ��" � 7 �.�•+.•. ♦!� r.t � � -moi ) '- -.,�� •+ -; .�) �..Ste. :/�h '1%�'�; r� .1-i.:�C�-..��,:•��: ::•.;1,:;''� :-=� +-•�. ,.. ;�-, ••' ' f'�r Z t'I`,,'�.t '� ...�,'� � _l.n .-:J1� n ^'-�p'•{/�'1•] �'.: ... 1 f 1.� �. � �1 J _ ' n�'7-� '-i�... •.� � f'', ^�.. -ti 7 �� /•� ,�n�t1�. 1 •,�: �.�1�f"1�� 1•� 1• t♦ A �_.. ` ,,' � � ..::.1 -.-3.7. .;� ••. .I' '4 •. ••1 �1_ "t^^ �e-. l �',)'� / ♦�\t+[�,L,�f'�•'�.•Y^,'%.•;.::1 X17,•,•�;,•�„f \,r`;.,,• ^., ,i••, �.�.j , 1 � •` �-r-��''J�, f.•1►11 i,�y'�.' i � •�.`�`, •�'^•;�'3 ^7 jy�.•'i. :'1^� '`•� i/•t�� Y•� '"w;7��-1 '•.v��.n�,,, '� (`'�11_� r'-''1.{. G t� ! �•..'1l��.3."_'y^�•y f^•;��' �"'..��' . ',.,1 ''1� ) •i.N•+'i'� �' / �4 ).-�. .' '� J,,..i - -- L Jol i •.�;�.,. =� '�').::%�'�' EXCEP T iCIV (NOT INCLUOEO N PARK) �� .� SALLY BEAQCHENIIi REZONIN The hearing regarding the application ofSallyBeauchemin to rezone approximately 5.17 acres from R-1, Residential Single, to A, Agricultural was convened. Ms. Beauchemin was present and indicated that she is the pro- spective buyer of the property and intends to house two horses on the parcel on Cliff Road. There were no objections to the application and the staff recommended that the Planning Commission recommend a special permit rather than a rezoning to Agricultural. Harrison moved, Wilkins seconded a motion to recommend approval of a special permit under Ordinance No. 52 to house a maximum of two horses which special permit would be subject to revocation by the Council if the Council determines that a violation has taken place re- garding the use of the permit and under the conditions of a special permit; further, subject to a five year limitation of the special permit and the agreement upon conditions to be prepared by the staff prior to the hearing by the City Council. All voted in favor. GI 777 N Agenda Information Memo April `17,: 1981 Page Fourteen COCA-COLAI - VARIANCE t ,HEIGRT Lac PING RQQTS E Coca-Cola Corporation for a Variance from the Leight Limitation and for a Variance from the Parking Requirements ,for an Industrial Zoning District -- public hearing was held before the Advisory Planning Commission a . their March 24`, 1981 meeting to consider an application submilt ed by Coca-Cola for a height variance to, allow for a silo ;`being approximately 72 feet in height which E. .4 would e' ceed the mai 40foot height allowed ' by. Section 52,07 subdivision 19. The second variance considered within the hearing was to allow the appl cant -to i<nsfail 93 fewer of parking stalls than , required by Section 52.,06 .aubdiv :si.ox 13 Act on was taken by the APC to- reco nd- approval of both variances to the City Council. " For additiotvai information sin the matter, please refer to the Planning Znter6-'s reports found on ' pages through 1 For action taken by ,the APC, p3ease' refer to ose minutes o nd on page , ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON , ATTRk": ''To approve or deny the recommendation of the Advsory ' Plannig Cammi.ssion to recommend approval of both variances as ap,lied for , oca-,Coa Corporation. 1 1 q y £ 3 CITY OF EAGAN SUBJECT:� VARIANCE APPLICANT: COCA-COIR WITLING MR)IMST, INC. LOCATION: IM 4-14, BLOCK 7, EAGANDALE INDUSTRIAL PARK, SECTION 3. EXISTING ZONING: L-I (LIGHT INDUS R' IAL) DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: MARCH 24, 1981 DATE OF REPORT: N1ARCH 18, 1981 REPORTED BY: KURTIS G. ULRICH APPLICATION SUBMITTED An application has been submitted for a height variance to allow for a silo building approximately 72 feet in height which would exceed the maxi- mum 40-foot height allowed by Section 52.07, Subdivision 19 of the City Zoning Ordinance. CONIIITI'S The applicant is requesting a variance for a silo building (approximately 2,240 square feet) with a height of approximately 72 feet and an adjacent lower roof support area (approximately 7,690 square feet) having a 45-foot approximate roof elevation. The proposed silo building and the accessory structure would represent a unique height variance situation due to the fact that the height of the structure is essential for the manufacturing operation of the many. If granted, the variance,should be subject to the following conditions: 1. The proposed silo building shall not exceed the dimensions of 75 feet in height, 28 feet in width and 80 feet in length. 2. The proposed lower roof support area shall not exceed the approximate square footage of 7,690 square feet. 3. The exterior of the proposed buildings shall not be used for the dis- play of advertising, trademarks, ca :)any logo or the like unless ap- proved by special permit. 4. All other applicable City ordinances shall be co plied with. 63 • 1011 N:•.:. :e, '.tall Minneapc::s.Minnesota 55403 American Institute of Architects National Society of Professional Engineers ..1 Setter, Leach & Lindstrom Inc. Architects and Engineers March 17, 1981 City of Eagan ` 3795 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, Minnesota 55122 Attention: - Dale Runkle City Planner RE: Variance #1 - Variance to Exceed Height Limitation Required in an I-1 District Coca Cola Bottling Midwest, Inc. Eagan Facility , Gentlemen: A variance to the 40'-0" height restriction is requested in order to ac- commodate sugar storage silos necessary to the syrup manufacturing function planned to be housed in the new Coca Cola Bottling Midwest, Inc. building. The size of sugar storage silos is based primarily on the amount of sugar used in their daily operation. It represents the amount of sugar necessary to be stored in order that the manufacturing process is not interrupted during the critical phases. Their heights and diameters also represent the accepted method of storing these large quantities of material . A variance for a silo building with a height of approximately 72' along with the lower roof support area having a 45'-0" approximate roof eleva- tion is requested. Refer to the enclosed 8J"x11" drawings identifying the silo building location at the southwest corner of the new Coca Cola Bottling Midwest, Inc. building addition. Very truly yours, Setter, Leach & Lindstrom, Inca Architects &Engineers Arnold J. Ci wski Project Manager xc: Andrew Spahl kd 1783.1 enclosures a O �• at S a ' x C = i128 FT. 7-7 46 FT. IT r All, It ♦. `.:�� ;Imo/ ► •�`�'.`I ,�.�. 1: � .�` - � )657 . N i i CD cn0 RZI ; - rmc■ ■ ZZ , m 46 V CIL 00 0 0 > xfn r 7D > y y >m / A 2 F _\ m i i x4 io 9 j'i_= m z , Z 66 • Peotl RL4s-P4 uete3 CITY OF EAGAN SUBJECT: VARIANCE APPLICANT: COCA-COLA BOTTLING MIDWEST INC. LOCATION: LOTS 4-14, .BIDCK 7, EAGANDALE INDUSTRIAL PARK SECTION 3 EXISTING ZONING: L-I (LIGHT INDUSTRIAL) DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: NSI 24, 1981 DATE OF REPORT: MUCi i 18, 1981 REPORTED BY: KURTIS G. ULRICH, PIANNING ASSISTANT APPLICATION SUBMITTED An application has been submitted for a variance to allow the applicant to install 93 fewer parking stalls than required by Section 52.06, Subdivision 13 of the City Zoning Ordinance. canTff TS Coca-Cola Bottling Midwest Inc. is in the process of developing parking in order to meet the requirements of their proposed new construction of an additional 226,625 square feet of warehouse and manufacturing and 19,400 square feet of office space. The total number of parking spaces required by the Eagan City Zoning Ordinance would be 308 for warehouse manufacturing section of the new construction and a 129 for the office section of the new construction for a total of 437 required parking spaces. Based on the num- ber of employees expected to be added along with the new construction for a fully-operatirnal plant at peak times, Coca-Cola Bottling Midwest Inc. an- ticipates that approximately 319 parking stalls will be required. The park- ing Program outlined by Coca-Cola Bottling Midwest Inc. shows a total number of 340 parking stalls, 21• car stalls, more than the anticipated need of the ampany. Proposed number of parking stalls is also 93 fewer than is re- quired by the City Ordinance. If future parking needs are greater than anticipated, there is open land on the site to expand the parking to the south of the rail spur if necessary. In the past, other similar parking variances have been granted in the Eagan- dale Industrial Park area. If approved, the variance should be subject to the following conditions: 1. If future conditions indicate a need for additional parking, Coca-Cola Bottling Midwest Inc. shall be required to provide that additional park- ing at the request of the Eagan City Council. 2. All other applicable City ordinance requirements shall be complied with. The area of the building used as office space shall not be increased unless additional parking is provided. /jac 6 ? ` . • 61 7. -8-8741 0 1C** '.tcollet Ma° M - ,apolis,Minresota 55403 Amer,can Institute of Architects National Society of Professional Engineers Setter, Leach & Lindstrom Inc. + Architects and Engineers , 1 i. March 17, 1981 City of Eagan 3795 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, Minnesota 55122 Attention: Dale Runkle City Planner RE: Variance #2 - Variance to the Parking Requirement for an Industrial District Coca Cola Bottling Midwest, Inc. Eagan Facility Gentlemen: A variance to the parking count is being requested in order to accommodate the owner's programed number of parking stalls. We request a variance to provide 21 cars more than the programed amount and 93 fewer than is re- quired by the ordinance. These calculations are as follows: New Construction Warehouse/Manufacturing 226,625 sq ft Office 19,400 sq ft TOTAL 246,025 sq ft Parking Required by ,the Owner's, Program Corporate Facility (Office) 40 Sales Facility (Office) Employees 32 Sales Staff 17 Warehouse 150 maximum Route Drivers 80 maximum TOTAL CARS REQUIRED 319 Parking Required by Zoning Ordinance Warehouse 308 Office 129 TOTAL REQUIRED 6 g 437 i Mr. Dale Kunkle City of Eagan Page -2- March 17, 1981 The new parking outlined above represents spaces over and above the spaces already provided on the existing site. As the parking was planned for the fully-operational plant at peak times, it is not expected to have parking pressure that will exceed the program. If by chance, in the future, that would occur, there is open land on the site to expand the parking to the south of the rail spur. Very truly yours, Setter, Leach- & Lindstrom, Inc. Architects & Engineers 'Arnold J. Citdwski Project Manager xc: Andrew Spahl kd 1783.1 4 I � I � = ; r r . qw LT If - 1 r I N }Q>t t E Ail -- -r-L, S L ca O F co t HE'S KENN � � = MM_808- 2 fA •✓' �� ' / /� .S �, `•• .r:' Sum `.• � .� ti •"s''� � •. • -•'� Y ,�� PARCEL � TEFF! l'"' - � � � „�„ ;,;� % � •:;• , _ �, r.41, rill IN ♦: r;•,.. � ,��. � � :• ;�'';:;ti••:•�• .� ` •� � • �` 1 r./ 1 t Ir•c• • 1/ r WY— ` iiti"? � f`Ea'. i :\'�• :'- ^•'.,. : r./. r IS-�•1.r'•� `,'/,�j�~f' I✓. ` � ��a / A •� /�`;-' i ~ti�_•,r•• •r.� r r��. ... 'r:.•. r � :•� ;•. . r L Pf: � c.- r • • COCA COLA BOTTLING MIDWEST, INC. VARIANCE FOR BUILDING HEIGHT A public hearing regarding the application of Coca Cola Bottling Midwest for height variance to allow for a silo building approximately 72 feet in height exceeding the maximum height of 40 feet allowed under Ordinance No. 52.07. A representative from Setter, Leach and Lindstrom Architects was present as were representatives of Coca Cola Bottling. There were no ob- jections to the application and it was noted that the area is outside of the air traffic safety zone. Hall moved, Wilkins seconded the motion to recommend approval pursuant to the following conditions: 1. The proposed silo building shall not exceed the dimensions of 75 feet in height, 28 feet in width and 80 feet in length. 2. The proposed lower roof support ' area shall not exceed the approximate square footage of 7,690 square feet. 3• The exterior of the proposed buildings shall not be used for the display of advertising, trademarks, company logo or the like unless approved by special permit. 4. All other applicable City ordinances shall be complied with. All members voted in favor. COCA COLA BOTTLING MIDWEST, INC. — VARIANCE FOR PARKING The next hearing convened concerned the application of Coca Cola Bottling Midwest, Inc., for variance to allow the applicant to install 93 fewer parking stalls than required under Ordinance 52.06 for the expansion of the Coca Cola Bottling plant. Three hundred and forty spaces would be provided and addi- tional land could be used for parking in the event that it becomes necessary. There being no objections, Harrison moved, Krob seconded a motion to approve the application subject to the following: 1. If future conditions indicate a need for additional parking, Coca Cola Bottling Midwest, Inc., shall be required to provide such additional parking at the request of the City Council. with.2. All other applicable City ordinance requirements shall be complied 3. The area of the building used as office space shall not be increased unless additional parking is provided. All voted in favor. It was further understood that Coca Cola would take all steps necessary to avoid employees and other persons parking on the public streets near the Coca Cola plant. 7 F 3 a . 5 t n.rt Agenda Information Memo April 173, 1981 Page Fifteen {Y NQN-IIS TOICI«CA .ING LIW,0 I.IG NS �- _.$.. SEN SIS ETON F Maureen Singlreton: . far a Tera 3:2 Non-Intoxicating Malt Liquor Licensefor . 2, 1981 Garage ' Sale at 2057 Bluestone An application for a non-intoxicating malt liquor license was applied for by a Maureen Singleton at 2057 Bluestone Drive. Mrs. Singleton, alongnth `.40.1-to ,_50 other:= amities,, is scheduling a community ' garage sale: ' for , May: 2, -'1981 , and has ma application for a non-intoxicating. <:malt liquor license. ' 'The City dmtnistrator has spoken with. Mrs.` 'Sinlgton -and it app.eArs the 1 q?uuor 1:ieense Ex would be for profit: In, reviving Or, * nce 43, S ction 43.15, Subdivision 11 ' "A temporary , on sale : lit"se may be issued. upon 1 application to - the Coil to .any chs�i<table or non-p of it organi- 0 for a fee `prestrtbed ,,by ,. the' Council on a one ay basis and. not to exceed two c eclu ive days-. ` h+ oun it sh 11 prescribe such Gond tions � Ca th+s=.: piim �t ss i sn advisable nd necessary under the cireumst�►nces.. ' A+ceordi idinance 43 it is clear that the intent of a temporary l° cense is not. for issuance for profitable cause. in ',speaking with Mrs. _,,Singleton, she was not aware that liability i ►surance can run Ih"',for a .one day temporary L license and further ;It, didn t- seem to make a lot f, difference to her and tha< tither.-perti.cipants it% :6 . 'garage sale s to whether the license was: granted ctr "not. In ortir .to Cons such a license it. would be -necess;a o amend` the, -ordinance or provi a for avag - ance to the afarerse�nti ,ed- stcti.nn o rdinance 43. he necessary background �checks ha�xe been made b the,:pal ice Ltepart ant and there are no problems regarding the applicant. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THE H0, Tp either ap rove, or deny the "temporary non--i to cicatfng `malt - .quer ;license to Maurean S n- gleton. PILELIMIA X ..SLAT APFI Imo. :JOYCE AgDI IEIAi �G Pr+el iminary Pmt ;fbr Joyce Addition' �- On July 5, 1980, the preliminary pkat was 'considered' for ,Joyce. Addition by the City Council:. ' ; The Cit staff had recanendd that approval of this pkat not be' proce�s� until the truce °ato i sewer outlet was ap- proved and ordered:`ft r "installationz p i ng the Waco sary drainage that wouldlbe generated by the plat. iso , OT , the City Council continued consideration of the plat,-.'�cikil :the appropriate drainage ,projects were .pres.ent "iw, pub!, s d intima ely approved. az Project , 1828 t'LH.� Storm Sewer` i��.)�'��and Pro j cb 319' (Burr :._Oaf Pond Storm Sewer .• tlet) were aprared ata joint ublic hearing held on NoViamber � 4: ; i98 . Inas ar�tently, the st ff" proceeded with the fact ` that fhe ':preliminar�y plaEt was approve on July 15, coedit tined upon thdse~,`projects being-,a:pproved. However, a research k, 3 A P ;i � 5AWL,, r Agenda. Information`Memo April 17, 1981 Page Sixteen ._ y' ". of the minutes has indicated.: ,thaf, tecxiically, th preliminary plat was continued for consideration. Aeveread Meissner is now presenting a final ,plat for approval, however, prior to any approval " of the final plat,, the,-- preliminary , plat est be. approved as a tech- nicality: ACTION TO BE CONS DEM ON THEHATTER: To approve thepreliminary plat of Joyce Addition- per the conditions and recommendations of the Advisory Planni Commission of Jude 24, 1980 and the City Council of July 15 lt .` FINANCING GUESSER INC H Call for I.R. ea ring on , I cy 19, 19:81 for Gre ser, Inc. An application for I industrial ` �revenue:. financing 'will be submitted on Monday, April 201 1981, to 00nsider the f: nanci g to Iremodel an existing building land exlpand a building .currentZ occupied by Allied Company at `the. west` teraninati4n " oint of; Yanke Doodle Road referred to as approxzately 3' aeras land platted as the Royce Addition. Mike Grees-er isplanning to, move d his entire operation from his existing facility locate _o,� Seneca. Road to this new loca- tion Mr. Gres ser., sensitive ' o the outdoor storage that he feels is unsightly from T. H. 13 and the new location will provide better security and screening for bis business operation. Mr. Grasser's tentative" pian to the building would be to lease the facility with the potential future sale 'a d, more than likely, construct- 'a building compa�fit�le to his existing building on Seneca Road on the property where his open.. storage is presently located-. These plans - are " indefinite and should be regarded as tentative.: Since tlge ; propezty 'is properly platted and there are no "apparent" rezoning' oV. va►riance considerations, it is proper to consider a public hearing, for F industrial revenue fi ancing. The entire bond issue ` i estimated at $4,540.,064. There will be more to come on. this. m$t"ter on Monday as a part of the administrative packet F , ACTION TO 8E CONS' D ON THE MATTER :`,T approve or deny the setting of a : publ:it" bearing for the May 19; 1981 City Council meeting for industrfa ;revenue financing ftr'Gresse-r,; nc. d : i Agenda Information Memo > �Apri1 °7, 1981 Page 5`eventeen bON A. Dan Gra.n. t Concerned,, Cit zen Mr Don �rant as requested time on the City Council agendato-address his parking ticket issue with the City Coupci-I M$yor Blomquist; and the City dminist'rator " spent approximately, an h©ur and a half with Mr. & Mrs Grant after working hours on `Aprtt X15; 1981. A : second meeting { is' scheduled between Mr'. Grant., the' Chief of Police and the' City Administrator on _Monday, April 20 "1981,, to discuss a-, number of concerns and issues that were raised;. by the 'Crant familyrelating to the Police Department and the handling of the park,ivig ticket. copy :'of the questions ,=and statemes in draft note form disc'usse by Mr. and Mrs. "Grant with the Mayor and C ty ,Administrator are a closed with- out page number in the City Cmmcilpacket. This memo was sent to the Chief'" of Police.. There 'is no action recomme nded on this item. J wEAIDf WIDBTt TQR� �► TRiTCkCS B. Wendell W dstrom for St©rkge af. ` mks As s " ated in the informational memo provided to ' 'the City Council for the last City Council. meeting, Mr.. and Mrs,' `WendelZ> -Wi.d trom are equesti.ng an extension of the June 1., 1981 . .date' to allow the. keep ng of <trucks on their, property.' A copy of , that ;I:etter is enol sed on page Alrrnation if any memberof the City Council; would lie additional on this ' matter` regarding_;previous €tiscusions by the City Council.," court -action or any ))_A � related inform tion, please feel free toycontact this, office any` time:.an Monday or uesday. ACTIO r TO BE CONSID ' ED�4N THE` MATTER: To either approve or deny � 1�the roquest for an ext�enrion as pres ntted 4 Wendell Wi strom. r y A 4 G. & W. Trucking Inc. 3160 Trails End Road 7; St. Paul, Minnesota 55123 ` � rw;�� Yom: r ., March 16, 1981 cam/ 2� City of Eagan, 3795 Pilot Anob Road ` Eagan, Minnesota 55122 Dear Mr. Hedges: I am writing in regards to the June 1, 1981 expiration date of our permit to keep the trucks on our land. I have tried continuously all these months to find a suitable location but have been unable to do so. With the economic situation as it is at this time, it is feasibily impossible to do so. With interest rates where they are, and the price of property, there is no chance of meeting any add— itional monthly payments. I still have a substantial monthly truck payment to meet. Due to the constant rise of fuel, the increase of wage benifits, high interest rates and the price of land, it is impossible for us at this time. ;herefore, -I am asking additional time at this location. I shall continue to look for a glace with the hope of the economy leveling off somewhat. Yours truly, / Wendell Widstrom, President G. & W. Trucking, Inc. 76 Alike Agenda Information Memo Y April 17, 1981 Pageagt en . A lVEkTISINGX. WBRIAR `HILL C. Temporary Adver .sing Sign for Rrfr` I3ll __ A application sign Tollefs n, developer for a, temporary'.,. �d �ti�ing gn for; - Carl ofl Briar Hill. Addition., was received• and has. been processed by the City Planner. Fo ''a copy of the Planner's comm nts and con- sideration of conditions if the temporary ; advertising sign is ap- proved, please refer to, Pages ,. through ACTION - TO, RE, CONSI3 � A'T R. .�.eitter :approve or _deny }` -the application! for ti chary a ver,,,t i sing n as •perse ted. 1 r . I K f i TO: THOMAS L. HEDGES, CITY ADMINISTRATOR FROM: DALE C. FUNKLE, CITY PLANNER DATE: APRIL 17, 1981 RE: TEMPORARY ADVER'T'ISING SIGN FOR CARL TOLTE'SON An application has been submitted for a temporary advertising sign to advertise the Briarhill Townhouses located on, Silver Bell Road. The location of the proposed sign is in the SW quadrant of the new T.H.13 and Silver Bell Read. Ordinance #16, Section 16.02 states the location of advertising signs are permitted in properly-zoned business or industrial. Temporary ad- vertising signs can also be allowed in Agriculturally-zoned areas. The location that the Briarhill sign is to be located is in an area zoned L-1 (Light Industrial District). The definition of a temporary adverti- sing sign is an advertising sign which is allowed for a specific dura- tion not to exceed 2 years. The advertising sign would be 10 x 12 feet for a 120 square feet. Tem- porary advertising signs can go up to 125 square feet. Therefore, the sign is within the ordinance requirements. If approved, the sign should be subject to the following oonditions: 1. The sign shall be setback 10' frcen all property lines. 2. The sign shall not exceed a 125 square feet. 3. The temporary advertising sign shall not exceed a 2-year time period, and the advertising sign shall be renewed after the first year. DCR/jac 79 4'4 t + 'i 'r ��i, .�r ,1 11 '' +c f. .i ta,1"ia ,r• ,. s .j { vt 4 .t �.t ,'*, ; �2 t' !t+: i.'1�1. �, .t;jl tatl'i:('.•h.t1` .;�``(t.::l• �} f�,�'t�t ;, . < Il r+i4,1 'Sr{I'r 1,7..,^-,ti +,',?+i�;�yti•t 1*.�i, `+;1;},y:' i�ttyt1':�+t r ,`<,; y ,t,, `iti • t i.: 'j: �, : t Iri�r t7. r t��iL,•,SJ.1�. t R t•.#. i 1 i/ 1L..�.dv(1 1 V.a [ <. 'trt{i• ,'1'2 a i + ,ice t � t. 3 (itt t. 1 ,a +•/ t '�{{ �f v,fy rtj t•,l '{t{t 11�{�r�l.v'rlLr ti�^ytl?a'ai)I ra(!Y�t�t�.�l,•{rl it�tl f1�!'r!(j�ist.•i{2311.t'tl�(1{�t!�S`l•-�! aj tI(fl7t-t11+1`4lY jf�l li s'i;i�S �!;{�i�'ay,.3�V�fi 1��,�r.�:st"a4 jii.t`�'i,;l j4fi it{1,1t[�'!f't 1(t'4L ii,!{Ii�t��.y,;f,{y1 {i+�a"••i��t Z�t�t��{'711�•Si t�1r y13ittftrl � �•'S -�',� (+t i✓'tett) L {S'i�.;t�i taiV4�'d,.afrj L {1it �a Ltjils{�}�;/ 1{ ! a-,4�f'7{r ',t+"a•r.`t:'v'( 1's� { ti 1{!� t j�Y:(i{�( }�.t ii'tif�+�(�tt ;`4t: r :.• J' y v.a }(f Xi<. d < {v 1� 4 !,}Irif1 tf( lil{ ' i,�`t ' / K t '• 2 a t in;a; t,t i L t s r,�' ' [ i3 i, • ;� 1{ i,in �.j y'tjt'dt'L"t i:��r �Itt:.i{:t:{I'fitst s,{11cii{4�,• :. t t;t ,t',. ,F,; L;�./Ir 'L,I�t ;,{-Ls .`i tjti `t. , t it";, r�' i�J`*+i aV <'y�.1,1 t;t 1 d t'L iV �111� t �y� ' }( a :i..a .IY + 1r y a4 i.'1. S,•lt.. i {'V 1 !17[ a 'ty�{ t i.0 i, i 2 t. f t 1 ! .t �{.�'• V ( 4V t1a S t 1 <{{ [_lt:.S�f Y t ,V t 2�, L V ••( •1L 1 l {1(iraf 1!4 /t:� 7 �`?<'i,i� 1 iY t�<til: SL.Y :�' ' Ii, ;iS�4d i i tY'tf1t V J {,i!•f Si 1 < ..i ' '7, t ! t i 'i t •/ 1 a i t r vL tL .y'.��V ; .t:L t '{ V,� � i, �S. i . t •1; t .:. i r t:r /,+. ��•Let.sy�! ,y`a.l � f( •� y', y '� .+ t a: t{t i { ( {'' L ,y •� faai.(y *1'gJLi �t1•:tilfj+'- iL s'lu't. rr t iJ ;<::/yt�UZI!t �41�,`•� 'if��If-1.1��.�eit�{�{;�t;5��~,`l (�-{t i}Ij:u�•{�t{,ft�'L•1.�`t.� +{s�.t1t�1'l'7!`!r.'.��;f!fi`f j, �, �'" ! .",!�'1/<'�,t<Z.'iti ��a {tt.ii 1�+yt Ott N i 9J 1 �. f,.fa. L, t,a•1• , ! {;' sA a{rl 2 ea+ii;r� i4� { ZIP. AIL j,,�:l ti{['t �t ��• .:�/ „� a �. ft'<�r a .t [t �`. .t{1 ,<,1_ •, to <{ j, ,fie ; ,•t ' i � ;�; { .4'{.J ,t 4yri.Yi� '7 -°5 � .i't lti fi t {�• Ji+ jti5- tit ?( i. t!dt+� �.4' y .• t <' f v' •1.'.�r � di 1 ( 1 •� "i t 1. v' S. Y �.. ,•.., ��,�`. to I {�; {T f ';'SSI {. 'tt r . �- _• • . 5'�� : 1� 1j _i7 Iy<<� ,(, •� ti r� t Z ..♦�+ < V.7,i 2� -<f ,, tat ♦.r <{:.� i i ' y';a L, t({* r:1 V tisf } ' ."'{ { t ._1 •, �t a � l:ti 4 7 ., 2 '•{ ! y,<t ,.1f n � a << �, St , ,; r - <, ( a t { *+.', .yl i r. /',� �: 1 t "'[rr S l ,t3/�fv aV{ <�ri 4 ie..' 1: � :•; , [ t_ {i-tt(y ['f'i Ju L t 12 s •-' a t<-a{.I,1 -.t i�',•Jt `:(V`ti -t �•.' '�• 7 �..r� L f 1 < 2 ., < ait"t t , ,f, t ; t t •i1 f �S Ttc �t;�rt� lei,` 3df:V Zi ..{� ,•a ~tvt•<� d i• + ; ,� .t1: 1 '•if �` ,i:i, 't { Li. _. �+..�, +r r7I e a'X..i,.j < 1 as 4: tt r a.+ ♦. [;' t+ 1 �,• :j • ,r2 { i /< t� ,>< � f.11 t, :t I tt,`.. , .{ a( .f { {•< ak'ts / •� S. ti` tra i �r e. ,a �<.+ ..�i �a Lt rte. ~<� t. j('t r . { 11.�•��, �::( .F [ t S�,/V'' I{ r+ *® ! •{ y t{ s• , r = < 7 (.t' 1. ,!. 1 , if � Y. J {- t �7[;,� .�.y( 72 { f. 3 V, t tt.,f (�a ('t�'< a - 1" < r y a i 'i < +(; 4 • �( 7~� t ..,. a t 1- Y,1 i - + v i t < t i'! .... eek ,x ti a �tJ � ! .t t -�f 1 <•t_ K, n a a: 'f i 47 J ,a 4 i- \'_. ! • , _ ' j f �� `Izz* �.r.• t < l 2, .+ f,. , ('c 2 7 a ri i 4 L � i ' ,; - 1 s Y 3`,\\.�-.,��. C f•2f t a t t � { 1 a ,f { a � 1 ti t < [t< { <f < � , �,ri"�� iiV..7X7 �t �. +s �♦ ay• v +f -7 t e 12��1;�..( t .,�:;�;L' , .[ ...-'{. • , � '�`t:. .. t.11; ,.., +i •, . ,v , . .. ��. t.. t . ..i {- ♦ < [-. . . .! - .1 , -t -• ., .1'►"•► •i�;.,s s:r ..,.. .,P f'`h,it :.rs. r'i -�.n's�tC1'.�Jks:.�,a'wk�ly� RsDr�Pti.:►:�.�.'lC�,ht):i:> F �y+�,%'�,'��`f. •��w"�,►�r��.yi�'�r ►~'�'J->'f'�''r�'�''`'rs'1►!'P:i}3�(��}.-}>�t.:li i�y�s1,►1}'14. ��t�}Yi'1'j',�': 17 Yi•!i}t.�Yr i��F.k}s.�f1*PPIrF,lr�`L�P}�'� i.'i.�-'T�i►, a:r��>� P h ! Y 1 . t• 1�.�N,> P.P !_.. Y. r. y> irs. k y }, n w -- ) ►. y e'�i' ►. '_ _ >„�y t, F-ti'if. �'s;ta h►�r�i,Py., � , r. : y 's �f1 4 *y •fi � � r. � s > . �,► � �, Y �11 Y.'ti>i�►.►i k? };�.hR r t�k;}�►rr,J h..� � P1_. Yds :.n ,Y t�, )l s,'T +. Y-�Y� ♦ N .L.► �► ✓i',► Y P � =P f. -.� t'►ti -r- '�y, Pr�� . ► Y}� a:►,:`Y } ), .tP is y'�i' ik > P �., 1 r til .' h3 s +,� r.•. !� � i,rk► r y �?� '� ">�� ► :� � _r, 1 P�i,;r.s1.s- ►}S',�'}}�,'•' aZ a, flY: 1' r� 1 t � P �, � !•)� .. � �y „ 1�,,}, Y�i�P�K., s. r. t s .P,.,.,">_k,.):ac� .i�r.).S:Y.?.►✓,3. , vt'v� a.6P.�7... .♦..i'i:rtrnKt,'K}..}i'thr1._ l.- .L�l-:i:3,h.n'l�s}v ..P,.tl! .r .*r a 'P y ..P r 4 ♦a � _ r , a Pi i� s► V~Il ``vJ 7� V sr O'.7 ►fiP t, !;KKKS,�y� ► � �i, l�I�•� ) 1f'>. ��! i,t. i •� ��'r �i rtlf�l L' '�" "► �� rT v �K��':!V►1��'��If!L�"�'Sh �' . 'it�K 'J.}a. w . w t- R- X. • R- R V i out R-3 �a � A R-4 R-4 .• < L M / IQL 414. P CE I �, L I INDUS I A L;,-PARD A � R_i !- .IDGE VIEW: TANK — - 9L 41"KC�AM` i� PCRES ' AOf7'TJON - 7 R-4 JON ACKR A R- CROFTS R-4 _ i 141L c ILR _ } R s \ R- L_ R-I G 4 ti G4N MET O CENTS R -2 4 A H ORF. LB _ { .CSCR _4K>. .CSC PF R "�' A t i ---T-- ., R-1 376 77 Agendf rmati n Memo .. . a �n o o Aprill7, 1981 r ,' Pag a Nineteen tr .,. ETENSIc OF TRUCK TERMINAL _- LE AXE AI�WTI N D. Extension, on 'Trek Terminal/Leribke "Addition A, letter was received from Warner`. embke of Lembke Trucking Company requesting a one year extension to proceed with the slatting `o their truck terminal located at _ : �6descott Raad. In a letter fro Mr. Lembke, he states, that, because of financial reasons, he would like to have a 'one year extens n on the truck terminal. ACTION TO BE, CONST £ MATTER': To approve or deny the time extension for.'.t .• ruck terminal fo_ "Lembke Add ition. 1 AaS SME ITTEE' E. Special ,Assesst x�t -Cotaa itte tting, oU .March 31, 1981 -- At : . the April 7, 1981 Ci` Council 'tt e.tit , the 'Thomas Wal er reductio request regarding t area assessment°s; fr Project 41 was acte upon. There are sVer�l other items ,that were re commended bya the Special Assessment, .Committee to the ; City Councias referred to in the Special - As$esstner t Cc mitC ±s stinutes , inc uded in the April 7, 1981 '"-City 'Council' 'packot, pa a 141 through 144. A copy of all the backgr€�und infortion prc�rided by City staff was also enclosed as a supplement tca the April ;rT -4,81,�City Co ncil packet. It is recommexided. that action be. taken =she remainin items. ' ACTION , TO BE CONS D k " DH .THE MA r To approve or deny the recommendation, of 'the Special Assessment .Committee per their March . .3;i, 1981 minutes Special Nobe; � If aIW,°. member of the Cit' Council i missing the -� information,` pleas+ i . free to ccaritacft . the City Administrator's office And- a duplicate copy, will be provid i. TRIAL �REVENGE: BQ3 CEMENT F. Industrial Reve d Bond Plat tzt/Terms of Amortizing -- Questions have been raised by applicants,= fiscal co sult'ants and <` the City Council corcE=in the necessit Qf creati g guidelines V to handle self'-amo t or the term df itdustrial revenue bond placements., The Cityini.strator'.heli a3,,"meeting with represents- f ves of Miller & Shia '"der nd `.thy, City=t4 tor�ney to discuss this issue. Enclost�d oh Pale� � i"s ��copy 'off a memos dui that out- lines, the `recotmtendat n � an poai i"ori o£ the City Adi finis rator And City ;Attorney on .,'this items. One, of the: ppli.ca is concerned about the " amortizatf issue is Lcotic 'Laboratory, Inc. Mr. Jerry Reimer has reviled the draft �neno addressing . he, issue and his response is found O ,page , s ACTION TO BE CONS IDERED` dN THE MATTER: To either app�r 'e the recom- tnendatiott, of" the City oin strator =Y�r+s td ng criteria for the term of amprtizing ;debt for industrial re bond placement.' MEMO TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCILMEMBERS FROM: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES DATE: MARCH 25, 1981 SUBJECT: INDUSTRIAL REVENUE BOND PLACEMENT/TERMS OF AMORTIZING A meeting was held on March 25, 1981 with Warren Preeshl and Ernest Clark of Miller & Schreoder Municipals, Inc. , Paul Hauge, City Attorney, and the City Administrator, to discuss the necessity of creating guidelines to handle self-amortizing for the term of industrial revenue bond placements. After discussing the issue, it was generally agreed that the City should judge each issue on its own merits. That is, depending upon the applicant involved, the City would determine requirements as to the terms of amortizing the revenue placement. If guidelines are established for the self-amortizing of the revenue placement, flexibility on the part of the City is lost regarding this issue. Mr. Jerry Leimer, senior attorney for Economics Laboratory, Inc. , has raised the question with the City regarding the City's position on how the self- amortizing should be structured for the permanent financing of the revenue bond placement. Whether a self-amortizing schedule is presented on a straight line twenty-five year amortizing schedule or a twenty-five year amortization with a ten year balloon or any other combination should not be of any real concern to the City. How this debt is retired is an issue with the financial institution which lends its money under the private placement. In the case of Economics Laboratory or Carson Pirie Scott, a self-amortizing schedule is incidental due to the corporate strength provided by both companies and their ability to pay off debt at most any time during either the temporary financing or permanent financing. On the other hand, in the case of a shopping center issue, as an example---Pilot Knob Associates, a self-amortizing schedule, that is practical and feasible, should be recommended by our fiscal consultants. In other words, a twenty-five year amortization with a three to five year balloon may not be possible and therefore should not be considered or allowed by the City, but a ten or fifteen year balloon may be acceptable. In summary, it was felt that a preliminary resolution, once approved by a City Council, should be conditional upon the City reviewing the final amortizing schedule for short term and also permanent financing for the applicant. Once a preliminary resolution is approved by the City, a financial institution will then work with the applicant on a self-amortization schedule which should be reviewed by the City's fiscal consultants and an opinion given as to whether that schedule is practical or not for the issue in question. Therefore, the details of the amortizing schedule is to be considered on an issue by issue basis. City Administrator $3 ECONOM ICS L A B O R A T O R Y, i N c. OSBORN BUILDING. ST. PAUL. MINNESOTA 55102 LAW DEPARTMENT TELEPHONE: (612)293-2233 Ap r i 1 10, 19 81 TWX: (910)563-3739 TELEX: 297427 9 Writer's Direct Dial Number: -. 612-293-2281 Mr. Thomas L. Hedges "�%(i�j: City Administrator c0 APR 13 City of Eagan l,g� 3795 Pilot Knob Road ti Eagan, Minnesota 55122 Dear Tom: E 'L I got your April 6 letter on Wednesday morning, April 8. Upon telephoning your office , I find that the terms of amortization for industrial revenue bonds were apparently not discussed on the 7th, but has been postponed until the 21st. I will endeavor to attend the meeting on the 21st if at all possible. As I understand the attached memo, you are recommending that the City Council and its financial consultants jointly consider each issue on an item-by-item basis , giving apparent weight to the financial integrity of the borrower and the character of the borrower' s project. If that is the case, it appears to modify a previous treatment , gives the City flexibility, and does not bind it to any arrangement which it may believe to be unwise or inappropriate. As such, I would whole-heartedly support your proposal, and believe that others here at Economics Laboratory would similarly support it. I also recognize that the adoption of any structured schedule would probably be extremely complicated and burden- some, and may still be subject to change from time to time due to financial conditions generally. Resolution of this matter will assist us in structuring any long-term arrangements to replace the currently existing indebtedness . I accordingly appreciate your excellent efforts in attempting to resolve this question in an expeditious fashion. Very truly yours , ECONOMICS LABORATORY, INC . G. W. Itorney er GWL/pb nio Agenda Information Memo April 17; 1981 ! Page Twenty _1981 FEE EV,IEW G. 1981 Fee Schedule Review -- As',14 follow "up to : the: `1981 Water & Sewer Utility User Rate Fee, it seemed appropriate to compile all fees within one sphedule book for ,easy referencey, City staff and anticipated annual:' review by City Council. City staff was not able to complete t fee schedule in a fashion for City Council . review and, thereE4r. requesting continuance of t is item until the May 5, 1981 City. it "meeting. ACTION 'TO BE 'CONSIDEMM ON THE, MATTER:, Continuance of the Fee . Schedule review -for 1`981 until, the May 5 19.8'1 City Council meeting. E'�Ri3l� NCE " � i H meed Ordinance, The =City office's . are beginning to receive a number of telephon�+ ,calis: regarding, th.e enforcement: and control of noxious weeds andox height, of grass or brush within the City. A weed .ordinance was 'considered . by the City_ Council last fall; however, the reaction given by; the -.City Council was the ordinance was too broad and; enforcement would riot be possible as written. The ordinance has beenrevised to define a; nuisance s dead weeds grass :or brush , found in 'any platted .or residential lot adjacent or within 100', feet 'of a developed or properly maintainedIot, there- fore eliminating fields or pro rty that is unpla ted adjacent to residential areas. In many (Boor developing area ;, a lot will be developed, a home will "be constructed, a considerable amount of money spent on larids.caping, including -hod; and, due to the fact the adjoining lot is` not maintained, many : of, the noxious weeds, crabgg rassand other ou sance will blow over on to the newly land- scaped lot creating al ,rtuisance to that property owner. This ordi- nance would ,provide a 4'1e,thod of regulating :hgjcious wee s "and ac%mu- k lation of weeds or grass, within controlled areas of our City, those v being the residentially. platted areas. , .'Therefore, the ordinance has` been scaled down considerably and it is hopeful that considera- tion can be .given' by the, 'City Council our Weed nspeetor can begin enforcing the Cgirplaints and .prob�10ms that are in_g received ' at City Hall regarding the control of weds. Enclosed on pages ( through is a copy of 'a revised draft .of the weed ordinance. ACxioN TO BE CON91' 'A0, ON , THE MATT; To approve I or deny the , ordinance as presented dr with proper 'a. went. a , CITY OF EAGAN DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. - WEED CONTRDL AN ORDINANCE REGULATING THE CONTROL OF WEEDS IN THE CITY OF EAGAN, DAKOTA COUN'T'Y, MINNESOTA. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EAGAN DOES IMY,ORDAIN: SECTION .01 -- DEFINITION. The ward "weeds" as used in this ordinance means and includes all noxious weeds as defined by Minnesota Statutes Section 18.171, and all useless and trouble- scarce plants as are commonly known as weeds to the general public. SECTION .02 -- NUISANCE. All weeds or growing grass or accumulation of dead weeds, grass or brush, upon any platted or residential lot adjacent or within 100 feet of a developed or properly maintained lot in the City of Eagan is hereby declared to be a nuisance and danger- ous to the health, safety, and good order of the City, provided that said weeds or growing grass are greater than one foot in height, or have gone to seed, or are about to go to seed. SECTION .03 -- DUTY OF UZIER, LESSEE, OR OCCUPANT. It is the duty of any owner, lessee, or occupant of any property containing weeds in violation of Section .02 to remove or cut such weeds to bring the proper- ty into compliance with said section. SECTION .04 -- WEED INSPECTOR. The City Council of the City of Eagan shall appoint a Weed Inspector to enforce the provisions of this ordinance upon such terms and conditions as the City Council deans proper. SECTION .05 --NOTICE. If the owner, lessee, or occupant of any property in the City of Eagan permits a nuisance to exist in violation of Section .02, the Weed Inspector, or his 86 0 • assistants, shall serve a notice on the owner, lessee, or occupant or upon the agent of the owner of such property, ordering such person to have such weeds or grass cut or otherwise removed within ten days after the service of such notice. Such notice shall also state that in the event of nonccupliance, removal will be done by the City of Eagan at the owner's expense. If no owner, lessee, occupant, or agent of the owner can be found, notice shall be sent by certified mail to the person who is listed on the records of the County Auditor or County Treasurer as the owner. Service will be complete upon mailing. SEC'T'ION .06 -- OVAL BY CITY. If the person -upon whom the notice is served fails, neglects, or refuses to cut or remove such weeds, grass or other vegetation within ten days after receipt of such notice, or if no person can be found in the City of Eagan who either is or claims to be the owner of such lot or land, or who either represents or claims to represent such owner, the weed inspector shall cause such weeds, grass, and other vegetation on such lot or land to be cut or removed or otherwise eradicated. The actual cost of such cutting or removal or other eradication will be established by resolution of the City Council. SECTION .07 -- PERSONAL LIABILITY. The owner, lessee, or occupant of property for which weed control service has been performed as the result of said persons failure or refusal to perform said work himself, shall be personally liable for the cost of such service provided by the City. After receipt of the certified costs of weed control efforts, the City Clerk shall promptly prepare a bill and mail it to the owner, lessee, or occupant, and said costs shall be immediately due and payable at the office of the City Clerk. SECTION .08 ASSESSNENT. If the cost of weed control service by the City is not paid within thirty (30) days after mailing of the bill by the City Clerk, the City Clerk shall, prior to the first day of October of each year, certify to the City Council all such unpaid 97 charges. The City Council shall thereupon examine all such charges as submitted by the Clerk and if satisfactory, shall call a public hearing and levy assessments for such weed control service in accordance with Minnesota Statutes Section 429.061. All such special assessments shall be payable in a single installment with interest thereon at the rate in effect during that calendar year. SECTION .09 -- PENALTY. Any person who shall fail or neglect to cut and remove or otherwise eradicate weeds or grass as directed in this Section, or who shall fail, neglect or refuse to conply with the provisions of any notice provided herein, or who shall violate the provisions of this section in any other way, or who shall resist or obstruct the weed inspector or his employees in the cutting, removal, or eradication of weeds or grass is guilty of a misdemeanor, and, upon conviction thereof shall be subject to a fine of not more than $500, or imprisormyent of not more than 90 days, or both. Each day of any continuing violation constitutes a separate offense. SECTION .10 -- SEVERABILITY. If any section or portion of this ordinance is held invalid by a Court of competent jurisdiction, the invalidity shall extend only to the section or portion affected, and other secticns or portions of the ordinance shall continue in full force and effect. SECTION .11 -- EFFECTIVE DATE. This ordinance shall take effect from and after its passage and publication according to law. , CITY COUNCIL CITY OF FAGAN ATTEST: BY: Gene VanOverbeke, City Clerk Beatta Blom3uist, Mayor Ordinance Adopted: Ordinance Published in the Dakota County Tribune: 10 - x r Agenda InformationMemo April 17, ,1981 Page Twenty:-One ° HfNJS ING MR,SENIOR CtMENS � I. Housing for Senior Citizens -- Mayor Blomqu.ist and the City Administrator met `with,- Pastor Jim Borgschatz discuss the need for developing, a .`planning schedule to consider- ,housing needs for senior citizens within. our community. A method of providing low cost housing for seniorl citizens was discussed as well as luxury apartments or condominiums for, the same age group. It seemed appro- priate that the thought process begin for structuring an investiga- tive committee to ;ditrmine alternatives and plans for approaching r` housing for senior citizens at :thistime. Though . a reality may r.' �= not occur for several dears, at least the concept is being thought about and planned rather than reacted to if an application should be presented to the pity. ` ` Jiro: Bctrgschdtz . is .`plane ng to attend the City Council meet, ,t as a resident of .the communi y , and comment upon his -concept. . "It is ;got necessary to take a` tion at this meeting; however, thea iyor. -wanted`- this ,:.i teen on theagenda to at least consider the - QNl RAC .s J. Contract 81-2, Approval Flans +& Specifications (Twin View Manor, et al, . Streets) -- Pon t 81 -2 ` provides . for the installation of improved streets. in; the< Ioilowin subdivisions: Project 264B, Twin View Manor; -Project 284B;, Windtree Addition; Project 293B, W tidcrest Addition; F r i jest ; 3088, uc od Trails `Addition. All projects have had their phblic hearings held with improvements officially ordered ;in by .the City Council. . ACTION TO BE CUNSIDED -ON THE MATTER: To approve plans and speci- fications for Contraot. ;_$1-2; and authorize adverti,sem nt for bids with a> bid opening to bi held 11 :00 a L. . '`Thursday, 'May14.1 ) 1981. CONTRACT 8t2 K. Contract 80-21, Ooeive Rids/Award 06� tinct CB ackhawk Lake Outlet) -- At 3:00 p.a : ., or} Thursday, April 16, an official bid opening was held for ,the. abbve referentei contract to provide for the installation of the z-trunk storm sravty .outl t for Black- hawk Lake for Project 297. A liscing$,:b� the bids a received is being forwarded for the,,Council l s infort 3c>n.; n; page City staff will check the accuracy of the #i .: d,,�%ake a tormal recom- mendation at the meeting ;on Tuesday.' ACTION TO BE, CONS IDZRED ON, THE MATT�� To receive the bids and either reject or apprea `, the: low succesul bid recei ed and award the contract accordingly, y myna:s, r or ` • OUR FILE NO. 49175 BLACKHAWK LAKE OUTLET ' STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENTS CITY PROJECT NO. 80-21 PROJECT NO. 297 EAGAN, MINNESOTA BID TIME: 3:00 P.M. , C.S.T. BID DATE: Thursday, April 16, 198 CONTRACTORS TOTAL BASE BID 1. Lametti. & Sons 613:000.00 2. Brawn & Cris, Inc. 641,754.30 3. Barbarossa & Sons Inc 725,220.00 4. Richard Knutson, Inc. 738,179.05 5. G. L. Contracting, Inc. 757,290.00 6. Nodland Assoc. 770,712.00 7. Acton Construction 826,232.00 8. B. G. Smith Sales & Const. NO BID 9. Progressive Contractors, Inc. NO BID 10. C. S. McCrossan, Inc. NO BID 11. Shafer Contracting NO BID 12. Winona Plumbing Co, Inc NO BID 13. Fredrickson Excavating NO BID 14. Orfei & Sons NO BID 15. Parrott Const. Co. NO BID 16. Northdale Const. Co. , Inc. NO BID 17. M. G. Astleford NO BID 18. Fisher Construction - NO BID ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE----------------------- $770,000 + -25% or $962,500 FEASIBILITY REPORT----------------------- 1,®74n000* LOW BID---------------------------------- $613,000 + 25% or $766,250 s INCLUDES 25% ! O